The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 04/09/2002 R COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA April 9, 2002 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99-22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMI'I-rED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (941) 774-8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1 April 9, 2002 INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. Father Tim Navin, St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church AGENDA AND MINUTES A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. Parte Disclosure provided by Commission members for summary agenda.) B. March 12, 2002 - Regular Meeting (Ex PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation for Collier County Government Days. Merritt, Public Information Director. To be accepted by Jean B. Proclamation for Organ and Transplant Awareness Week. To be accepted by Ed Morton, CEO of NCH and Jeff McRoberts. C. Proclamation for Water Conservation Month. To be accepted by Michael Ramsey, Chairman for Collier Soil and Water Conservation. D. Proclamation for Adopt-A-Canal Month. To be accepted by Cher Compton. E. Proclamation for Adopt-A-Road Program. To be accepted by Ms. Barbara Lee, Office Assistant II for Transportation Road & Bridge. SERVICE AWARDS Five-Year Attendees: 1) Scott Corbett, Transportation Operations 2) James Von Rinteln, Emergency Management Ten-Year Attendees: 3) Michael Sullivan, Emergency Medical Services 2 April 9, 2002 Fifteen-Year Attendees: 4) Maura Kraus, Natural Resources 5) Judith Scribner, Social Services Twenty-Five Year Attendees: 6) Joyce Ernst, Planning Services 5. PRESENTATIONS Recommendation to recognize: Lowell Raines, CAAD Operator, Facilities Management, as Employee of the Month for January 2002, Barbara Lee, Customer Service Specialist, Transportation Operations, as Employee of the Month for February 2002, and Amy Gesdorf-Patterson, Impact Fee Analyst, Office of Financial Management, as Employee of the Month for March 2002. PUBLIC PETITIONS AND COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS A. Public Comments on General Topics B. Public Petition Request by Mr. Tom Macchia to discuss a change in definition of "Concurrency" when it is applied to roads, water and sewers. C. Public Petition Request by Mr. Mike Carr regarding Congressional Redistricting. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Approve the Collier County Water Irrigation Ordinance restricting the hours of irrigation in Unincorporated Collier County. 3 April 9, 2002 o BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A. Appointment of member to the Contractors Licensing Board. B. Appointment of members to the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency (EZDA). C. Appointment of member to the Collier County Planning Commission. 10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A. Staff Report on plan to improve reliability of County water production. (Tom Wides, Interim Public Utilities Administrator) supply and 11. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS A. To present the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the Board of County Commissioners for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2000. To formally present to the Board of County Commissioners the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2001. 14. FUTURE AGENDAS 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. 4 April 9, 2002 A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Code Enforcement Lien Resolution Approvals. 2) Final acceptance of water utility facilities for Boyne South. 3) Code Enforcement Lien Resolution Approvals. 4) Approve Committee selection of Henderson, Young and Company for contract negotiations for RFP 02-3317 "Consultant Services for Impact Fee Update Studies - Fire". B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1) Approve a Resolution requesting that the MPO recommend to the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged that the Collier County Board of Coupty Commissioners be re-designated Community Transportation Coordinator for Collier County. 2) Recommendation to approve the purchase of one (1) 15 CY Dump Truck, Diesel, in accordance with Bid #02-3336, in the amount of $77,222.00. 3) Approve the Facilities Relocation Agreement with Florida Power and Light Company in the amount of $98,666 to relocate power line structures on Livingston Road between Immokalee Road and the Lee County Line to facilitate the road-widening project, Project No. 65041. 4) Award Work Order No. NTI-FT-02-02 in the amount of $80,000 to Native Technologies Inc., for the Gordon River Cleanout Project #31005. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1) Approve Tourism Agreement with the City of Naples for monitoring of the South Gordon Drive T-Groin, $48,000. 2) Authorize amendment to Camp Dresser and McKee Inc., Golden Gate Wellfield Reliability Improvements Design Contract in the amount of $40,000. D. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Award Bid #02-3351 to purchase arts and crafts supplies for recreation programs in the amount of $40,000. 2) Approve a Budget Amendment for Consultant Services for Park Impact Fee Update Study in the amount of $25,000. 5 April 9, 2002 3) Approve a Budget Amendment to recognize revenue in the amount of $5810 from insurance proceeds to replace a stolen tractor. E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1) Recommendation to rescind award to Astor Chemical Co., for potassium permanganate for inability to fulfill contract and award to Carus Chemical Company on Bid #01-3288 - "Chemicals for Utilities" in the estimated amount of $107,205. 2) Request Board approval to appropriate funds in the amount of $6,500 for a membership in Public Technology, Inc. F. EMERGENCY SERVICES 1) Approve the purchase of one (1) Medium-Duty Advanced Life Support Ambulance from American LaFrance Medic Master Corporation for the amount of One Hundred Thirty-Seven Thousand Thirteen Dollars ($137,013). This vehicle will be purchased under the Florida Sheriff's Association Bid #00-08-0905. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Void Committee Selection of firms for contract negotiations for RFP #01- 3290 "Fixed Term Professional Engineering Services". Ho AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1) 2) Request from Commissioner Coletta for approval to attend Collier County Education Foundation's Golden Apple Teacher Recognition Program as a valid public purpose. Request for approval for Commissioners to attend 4th Annual Country Jam to represent Collier County as a valid public purpose to interact with constituents and employees. J. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) Miscellaneous items to file for record -~vith action as directed. 6 April 9, 2002 OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the County Attorney's Retention of Process Servers for the County in upcoming eminent domain cases for road projects, exempt the County Attorney from the purchasing policy if and to the extent the purchasing policy is applicable and authorize the Chairman to sign any necessary retention documents. 2) 3) Approve the Agreed Order awarding expert fees relative to easement acquisitions of Parcels 169 and 769 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Fred R. Sutherland, Individually and D/B/A Sutherland Paint Horses, et al., Case No. 01-0756-CA (Livingston Road Project No. 60071). Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the settlement in Gallagher v. Collier County, Case No. 00-0565-CA-01, now pending in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida, pursuant to which the County would pay $50,000 and all claims against the County would be dismissed with prejudice, said $50,000 settlement was arrived at during a mediation of the matter. 4) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the settlement in Bettencourt v. Collier County, Case No. 00-0283-CA, now pending in the Twentieth Judicial Court in and for Collier County, Florida, pursuant to which the County would pay $150,000 and all claims against the County would be dismissed with prejudice. Said $150,000 settlement was arrived at during a mediation of the matter. 5) Authorize the making of an Offer of Judgment in the amount of $20,000.00 to Respondents, Joseph Call and Samuel Montello, for Parcels 4.3 and 4.4 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Joseph Call, et al, Case No. 89- 0987-CA. Project No. 73902. 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRI'I-rEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. SHOULD ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN. AJ RZ-2001-AR-1625, Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Mo?.tes Inc., representing Leo J. Fragiacomo and Annelise C. O'Donnell, requesting a rezone from RMF- 7 April 9, 2002 16 to RSF-4 for property located at 227 Cays Drive, further described as Lot 72, Stella Maris, in Port of the Islands, in Section 9, Township 52 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. 18. ADJOURN INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774-8383. 8 April 9, 2002 AGENDA CHANGER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETINC ADD: ITEM #5 (B): Introduction of Carole Senne, New Director for the South Florida Water Management District. (Commissioner Coletta request.) ADD: ITEM 9D: Board Approval of the FY 01/02 Advertising/Marketing Plan in the amount of $552,500 as recommended by the Tourist Development Council. (Commissioner Coletta request.) DELETE: ITEM 16(C)?: Authorize amendment to Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc., Golden Gate Wellfield Reliability Improvements Design Contract in the amount of $40,000. (Staff request.) MOVE: ITEM 16(I)1 TO 9E: Request from Commissioner Coletta for approval to attend Collier County Education Foundation's Golden Apple Teacher Recognition Program as a valid purpose. (Commissioner Henning request.) MOVE: ITEM 16(I)2 TO 9F: Request for approval for Commissioners to attend 4th Annual Country Jam to represent Collier County as a valid public purpose to interact with constituents and employees. (Commissioner Henning request.) WHERE~$. WHEREA& P/HEREA$. WHEREAS, Pt~OCLA/AA T%ON Collier County part/c/pates/n and celebrates the annual event. Counly Government Days which/s hem at the Coastland Center; and, fulfilling the needs of residents/n one of the fastest growing count/es/n the state is the challenge of Collier County Government; and. excellent customer service/s of the highest pr/ority for County staff, this event/s another opportunity to inform the community; and. this event affords the Counly the opportunity to increase community awareness about the services the County provides and to showcase its they display their the department sta to jnformat/on NO~V DAYS of designated DONE AND '- 04AXe. AN AI" 09 Pg ._...-~~ WHEREAS, WHEREAS, the nat/anal aryan transplant walt/n9 I/st has more than doubled in recent years to BO. 000, far exceed/ny the supply; ~and, one of ~he mo~ bene~/c/al g/~s one human be/n9 can be~ow upon another/~ ~he precious ~/~ o~ L/~e - organ and ~/ssae donaHon; o~d, WHEREAS, WHEREAS. this can be accomplished by educating individuals about organ and Hssue donation and transp/antaHon and encouraging family discussion on this vital issue; and, virtually anyone, regardless of age or previous fl/ness ~an be a potenHa/ donor; and, WHEREA& WHEREAS, organs that can be heart, I/ver~ ~ation include the . and sma///ntesHnes; and. and ~urv/vai and WHEREAS. WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREA~. April NOkV THEREFORE, be it' 'Collier County, Tree of Life on Commissioners of 2002 be designated as OR~AN and TISSUE DONOR A~VARENE$$ DAY IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DONE AND ORDERED THf5 9th Day of Apr/I, 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COIkftAI$5fONER5 / / -~'~'END A i'T EM No. APR '- 9 ZUSZ Pg,_ / ?ROCLA~A T-TON WHEREAS, the Collier County Water Symposium and the Collier Soft ti Water Conservation Dislrict encourages all aspects of water conservation among producers and users and to promote and achieve sound water management practices which will protect the environment; and, the Collier County Water Symposium and the Cd#er Soil ti water Conservation Disk¥ct #rive to faster cooperation among d/verse water-use industry, utilities, developers, environmentalists, manufacturers, contractors, and educators, as well as governmental and regulatory agencies; and, WHEREAS, ~he Cd#er Soft ti Water Conservation Oidricf s (CSWCD) mobile Irrigation Lab (AtIL} saved over 3I. 4 b/fl/on ~al/ons o/water durin~ its lifetime, among agricultural, residential, gowrnmental and institutional irrigators, through efficient application of water; and, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, the Co/I/er County Water Symposium and the CSWCD consistently promote water conservation by establishing educational nd~vorks, supporting research for water use efficiency, developing water conservation guidelines, disseminating water conservation information, serving as a resource for the development of storewide one on one/n the field, and advocating water compatible w#h economic ~-owth: and, . the .C.o~ llier" ~ i PZ~ter Symposium .a.n.d have identified an addit]ak~'~niW to ri~t C~erm~" de~ignated April, ~pfca. lly the'~as~ month ?~ Flobida~s.'d~ seas~q needs ore most a~e;'~aa P/or/do ~ ;na~al ~a~e : ~nstPvat~ consumers ~ta~"~cious water'~esbu~k$; and,.:'-. : ~ ~sfd~ial, gove~mental, agr/~)fuPal ahd ih~ti~tional: ~atee USers have many ~ys ~ ~ave wa~er including ultra'law flow fl/umbing, /andscapin~ amd ~e W~e u~e af la~n sprinkJ~s.~o ~elp conserve co~. ~qms for fPdgation; and '~-. when it come~ ~o con$ervi~ eye,one. NOW THEREFORE, be it Florida, that the month ~ be designated as of Collier County, WA TER CONSERVATION llONTH in Collier County and urge every consumer to become more aware of the need to save our precious water supply and to ~ake appropriate measures to conserve and protect this vital natural resource. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 9th Day of April, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COllllISSZONEgS COlliER COUN?~E FLORIDA AVl'EST: ,Till COLk'77'A, CHAIRllAN AGE ~3~. ITEM No. APR 09 200Z Pg. DWIGI-FI' E. BROCK, CLERK pROCLA~A TION WHEREAS, WHEREAS, the qualify of life and the ecological and economic well-being of Collier Counfy'~ citizens is critically dependant on the continued protection of natural resources within the county; and, Collier Counfy'~ access to clean and safe water as well as protection from flooding is enhanced by the South Water 'A4anagement bisfrict'~ maintenance of the more than 180 mi/es of canals within Collier County; and, WHEREAS, Keep Co/I/er Beautiful, Inc. encourages Collier County'~ res/dents to actively take responsibility for their environment; and, WHEREAS, Keep Coil/er Beautiful, Inc. with the support of the Big Cypress Basin Board of the $oo?h Florida Water A4anagement D/strict has ettnblZ ed an Adopt'~ "~'~! p~qm for/nd/v/duals, businesses ...... $h .. ~ . ~ ....... ..~... ond ~ro~ps to :'~olu"~ter t~)~"t~"'b~ grOdding re~u/ar litter NO~ THEREFOR~ ::.be ~t proc~fme~ by,the Board issioners of ~o/l/er'~aunW, F/or/da,. fhaf ~pr// of e~ch ~ed as DONE AND ORDERED THIS 9th Day o~ A~/I,' 2002 .::. ~OARD OF CHAIR~4AN A TTE$ T: DWIGHT E BROCK, CLERK - AGEHB~k ~T-E t4 No \ PROCLA/~A T£ON Collier County started the Adopt-A-Rood program in 1989 and has grown in the interim years from o few early sponsors to more than 80 sponsors covering 207 miles of County roadways; and, WHEREAS, Collier County's Transportation Operations Deportment provides supplies os orange vests, gloves, litter bags, pickup sticks and also erects on identification st'gn at each end of the adopted roadway. The County'~ Rood & Bridge Depor~ment picks up the filled litter bogs following pickups and disposes of t~em at ~e landfill: o~ WHEREAS, volunteers donate collectively 12, 000 hours per year utilizing from hca to six volunteers per sponsor. Combined they pick up total of 50 tons of litter per month, realizing o sow'ngs to county taxpayers of o quorte~ of'~"~lfllion.dollors each year. Volunteers ~HEREAS, cponsors mbke a ~o-7~ ~ommit~ bi. ~fr~t with fulfill their obli~tion.- ~O~y ~ponSor$'.ol~,.~ipotg in sp,ciol WHEREAS, a ~j~ntial program has been added/n the'last ~o years to e~cobra~e res/dents tm 7mprave their beaU'f/cation ~ojec~s andl/~er p~kaps andem ~e_~dopt-~- Rood ~am.,. '.~ ~.~.'. .. NOW THEREFORe' be it proclaimed by the of co///er . ~nt ?or/da, be designated and volunteers ore provide to the community. for the tremendous support they DONE AND ORDERED THIS 9Ih Day of April, 2003. BOARD OF COUNTY CO~AdISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A TTES T: ,T~t4 COLETTA, CHA£RI4AN DWIGHT E BROCK, CLERK AGEND~ ~-TEH No. MAR 2 6 2002 pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. RECOMMENDATION TO RECOGNIZE: LOWELL RAINES, CADD OPERATOR, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, AS EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH FOR JANUARY 2002, BARBARA LEE, CUSTOMER SERVICE SPECIALIST, TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS, AS EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH FOR FEBRUARY 2002, and AMY GESDORF-PATTERSON, IMPACT FEE ANALYST, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, AS EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH FOR MARCH 2002. OBJECTIVE: The "Employee of the Month" Program is designed to recognize exceptional performance, plus uniquely identifiable contributions, which produce significant results for the County. CONSIDERATIONS: This program has been in effect since April 1987, and has recently been revised to reflect an increase in the cash award. On March 26, 2002, the Board approved Resolution 2002-154, which increased the cash award from $50 to $150 effective January 1, 2002. The January, February and March recipients could not be officially recognized until Resolution 2002-154 was executed. The employees being recognized have each, in their own way, contributed greatly to job efficiency and customer service. Lowell Raines With Pride and professionalism, Lowell has produced drawings of the County's property, provided square footage (which Risk Management uses for allocation of insurance premiums) and replacement values that are necessary to provide insurance coverage for County property. This effort on his part saved the County $3,000 in fees that an independent appraiser would have charged. Every request made of him was achieved and done with a smile. He is wonderful to work with. Barbara Lee Barbara has been working with the Road and Bridge Department since 1993. She became the Coordinator of the Collier County Adopt-A-Road Program shortly thereafter and ventured out on her own time to aggressively pursue sponsors for areas of the County that needed the most help. Barbara made presentations to businesses, churches, and various organizations and associations, and the number of sponsors climbed from 40 to almost 90. In 1998, she began a program involving the Board of County Commissioners and the Department of Transportation, recognizing categorical excellence in the performance of the Adopt-A-Road sponsors. Some of the categories include se~ice organization and business participation. She also has begun a Residential Participation Program, involving various roads that are without a sponsor. Last year, with the cooperation of the Church of the Resurrection, Barbara staged a treasure hunt and litter pickup for an East Naples community along Bayshore Drive and Thomasson Drive. She had golf and tennis balls printed with the word "prize" and placed them in various locations along the two roads. Participants could redeem their prize with a bag of picked up litter. The prizes were donated by local merchants and indudeci restaurant vouchers, merchandise, cash and more. / PR 0 § 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recognition of "Employees of the Month" Pa,qe 2 Amy Gesdorf-Patterson Amy Gesdorf-Patterson is a highly energetic and innovative employee who has achieved major accomplishments in her short time with Collier County. Over the past five years, impact fee collections have increased by more than 140 percent. Because of record numbers of building permits for new construction, combined with intricate rules and many other difficult aspects of calculating fees, the day-to-day administration of the County's impact fee program has evolved into a formidable challenge. Amy was a key figure in the development of the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance and associated Administrative Procedures Manual. Her new system for processing incoming permits has reduced calculation errors to nearly zero. It has also provided fast, reliable capability for tracking the hundreds of permit packages that are taken in each week; and has enhanced customer service by significantly reducing the time required to complete the assessment of impact fees for each new permit. Amy has also enhanced the level of coordination between the County and the Cities of Naples and Marco Island with regard to County-wide impact fees that are collected by the Cities and passed through the County pursuant to inter-local agreements. Amy is widety known as an impact fee expert and frequently serves as a critical information source to County staff as well as to members of the building industry community. Amy interacts with development services customers every day and handles scores of information requests and complaints with the utmost skill and compassion. She consistently exceeds customer expectations as evidenced by the unsolicited "thank you" letters she has received. Amy Gesdorf-Patterson is a tremendous asset to Collier County. FISCAL IMPACT: "Employee of the Month" employees receive a $150.00 cash award. Funds for this award are available in the employee's department budget cost center. See attached revised Resolution No. 2002-154, which covers approval of this program and designated cash award for recipients. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact resulting from this program. RECOMMENDATION: That Lowell Raines, Barbara Lee and Amy Gesdorf-Patterson be recognized as "Employee of the Month" for January, February and March 2002 respectively. SUBMITTED BY:Dative AssistantDate: REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: Employee Services Department °ate: Jeff irector Employee Services Department [~ Date: Jo-Anne Leamer, Administrator Administrative Services Division RESOLUTION NO. 2002- ].54 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REVISED EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH PROGRAM PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. BT-S AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-82 AS OF JANUARY 1, 2002 WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. BT-S states that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall adopt a Resolution authorizing the expenditures of County l'unds to award County employees for recognition of outstanding service or achievement in connection with County employment; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board of Count' Commissioners to enhance County employee productivity, promote and engender goodwill toward County §overnment, encourage increased employee responsiveness to the needs and requests of the citizens of t~e County, and provide incentives for the a~ainment of these §oals; and WHEREAS, R~[ution 87-82 was adopted on April 7, 1987, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, establishing the Employee of the Month Award Program; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners cun'emly has an 'Employee of the Momh~ Program ~o reco§nize, by cash award, exceptional performances and unique comribulions to the County; and WHEREAS, il is the desire of [he Board of County Commissioners to revise the current Employee of the Month Program and to supersede Resolution No. 87-82, effective January 1, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that I. The cash award for the County Employee of the Month will be one hundred and fifty dolla~ {S150). 2. The attached Exhibit 'A' is hereby incorporated as part of this Resolution and is hereby approved as the process for nominating and selecting the 'Coun~ Employee of the Month and Year.' 3. Resolution No. 87-82 is hereby superseded, effective January 1, 2002. THIS RESOLUTION adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. AT,ES.T:-- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COL~ :.'1.D/~iggt E~. B,r°ck, ~[erk Attest as · -.;,,.~,p,p. roved'as to form ~nd legal sufficieno/: Michael W. Pettit I,',AR Assistant County Attorney HUMAN RESOURCES APR 0 9 2002 EX~I[BIT "A" COUNTY EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH AND YEAR OBJECTIVE: To recognize by an award, exceptional performances plus un/que contributions which have produced a significant results for Collier County. ELIGIBILITY: NOMLNATION PROCESS: All full time regular non-supervisory employees, having completed the six-month probationary period; and having been rated at least "meets standards" on their most recent performance evaluation. .am employee may be nominated by a fellow employee, immediate supervisor and/or Department Director. All nominations must be fonvarded and approved by the Department Director. If approved, the nomination is submitted to the Employee Services Department. Employee Sen'ices will screen the nominations for qualifications and forward them to a committee comprised of representatives from each County Division. The committee will meet once each month and elect by majority vote, an "Employee of the Month" for the following month. The criteria should include, but not necessarily be limited to: significant accomplishments beyond normal work responsibilities; exemplary customer service; professional ach/evement; application ora uniquely innovative solution to a problem; implementation of a recommendation that resulted in cost savings, higher productivity, etc.; active community service; service beyond the call of duty. After a decision has been reached by the committee, the Employee Sen'ices Department will undertake the notification process and complete it, at least ten (10) days prior to the second Board meeting of the next month at which time the employee xvill be honored publicly in open session and be introduced to the Board of Count3.' Commissioners. All monthly recipients xvill automatically be elig/ble for the "Employee of the Year" Award. The committee as stated above will meet early in December to choose a winner, in time for the award to be given before the final Board meeting of the years. The Employee Services Director, or Iris designee, will attend, but will not vote. After the decision has been made, the Employee Services FUND/NG: AWARDS: Director will direct the notification process so that the announcement will be handled in a timely way. The funding for the awards will be as follows: The Monthly Award - funds obtained from the appropriate departmental budget. The Yearly Award - funds to be obtained from the General Fund. Monthly - $150.00 Yearly - $250.00 plus reserved parking for one year. Copy of certificates will be placed in the employee's file. 0 § 2002 .... COLLIER COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8383 FAX (941) 774-4010 March 26, 2002 Mr. Tom Macchia, President Taxpayers Action Group 5645 Eleuthera Way Naples, FL 34119 Re: Public Petition Request to Discuss a Change in Definition of "Concurrency" When it is Applied to Roads, Water and Sewers Dear Mr. Macchia: Please be advised that you are scheduled to appear before the Collier County Board of Commissioners at the meeting of April 9, 2002 regarding the above referenced subject. Your petition to the Board of County Commissioners will be limited to ten minutes. Please be advised that the Board will take no action on your petition at this meeting. However, your petition may be placed on a future agenda for consideration at the Board's discretion. Therefore, your petition to the Board should be to advise them of your concern and the need for action by the Board at a future meeting. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Board's Chambers on the Third Floor of the W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") of the government complex. Please arrange to be present at this meeting and to respond to inquiries by Board members. If you require any further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas W. Olliff County Manager TWO:jeb cc: David Weigel, County Attorney Jim Mudd, Deputy County Manager APR 9 2002 · Page 1 of 1 bodine_j From: olliff_t Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:31 To: q-om Macchia' Cc: bodine_.j Subject: RE: Agenda Mr. Macchia, We will have your request on the first BCC meeting in April. Thanks for getting back to me. Tom Olliff. ..... Original Message ..... From: Tom Macchia Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 2:22 AM To: olliff_t Cc: Donna Fiala; CoyleFred; coletta_j; 3im Carter; henning_t Subject: Agenda Tom OIliff County Manager We would like to place on the upcoming County Commission meeting agenda the following proposals: We request that the County Commissioners instruct staff to accomplish a change in the definition of "concurrency" when it is applied to roads, water and sewers. Presently the definition allows a three year window. We would like to close that window by redefining the definition to explicitly mean that roads, water and sewer facilities must be in place and fully functional before permits to start construction can be given?" If the Commission is not so inclined we at TAG would like the question placed on a November referendum TAG Taxpayers Action Group Executive Committee President Thomas macchia APR - 9 2002 3/22/2002 COLLIER COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE March 29, 2002 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8383 .FAX (941) 774-4010 Mr. Mike Carr Collier County Republican Executive Committee 2641 Airport Road South Suite A-108 Naples FL 34112 Re: Public Petition Request Regarding Congressional Redistricting Dear Mr. Can': Please be advised that you are scheduled to appear before the Collier County Board of Commissioners at the meeting of April 9, 2002, regarding the above referenced subject. Your petition to the Board of County Commissioners will be limited to ten minutes. Please be advised that the Board will take no action on your petition at this meeting. However, your petition may be placed on a future agenda for consideration at the Board's discretion. Therefore, your petition to the Board should be to advise them of your concern and the need for action by the Board at a future meeting. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Board's Chambers on the Third Floor of the W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") of the government complex. Please arrange to be present at this meeting and to respond to inquiries by Board members. If you require any further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, County Manager TWO:jeb cc: David Weigel, County Attorney APR - 29 ?. t Pg._ - = .... _. MICH~kEL CARR STEPI-L~a\'Y S. CARR Board Ccrtificd in Business & Consumer Bankruptcy Law by the American Board of Certification CARR & CARR ATTORNEYS AT AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH, SUITE A-108 NAPLES, FLORIDA $4119, RECEIVED COUNTY MANAGER OFFICE MAR 2 S 2O02 ACTION FILE TELEPHONE (941)732-8722 FAX (941)732-8726 March 28, 2002 Jim Coletta Chairman Collier County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Jim, Thank you for agreeing to place on the April 9, 2002 agenda congressional redistricting. As you know Chuck Mohlke, the Chairman of the Collier County Democratic Committee and I will be at your meeting on Tuesday, April 9, 2002 to request the Collier County Commission join in a law suit on redistricting. The issue seems clear, there are numerous law suits on this subject and the courts are going to draw the lines. The only way for Collier County to have its voice heard is to have a suit in front of the Court. The Congressional Redistricting plan passed by the legislature would provide Mr. Balart with a seat in Congress and deprive our citizens of a local congressman and our fair share of federal dollars. It would cost our taxpayers millions of dollars over the next ten years. The Collier County Commission would be asked to make up the difference by increasing taxes. Even with the best efforts of our commission it would not be possible to repair the damage caused by lack of a local congressman, since many of our needs will require approval of Congress, for example expansion of 1-75 and federal dollars for education and federal grants, especially for the Immokalee area. I have provided the county manager with a copy of this letter. ike Carr' -~ --~' Chairman Collier County Republican Executive Committee APR - RESOLUTION NO. 02- 8 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING TIlE LOCAL LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION IN ITS EFFORTS TO I'ROTECT COLLIER COUNTY CONCERNS REGARDING CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING AND SUPPORTING, IF NECESSARY, LITIGATION. WHEREAS, on September 11, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners, ("Board"), of Collier County, Florida passed a proclamation supporting the Citizens For Fair Redistricting in their efforts to ensure that during the redistricting process Collier County be aligned with its contiguous west-coast counties and communities of interest and not be included in Congressional Districts extending from Florida's southeast counties of Broward, Miami/Dade or Monroe; and WHEREAS, most of the proposed maps of Congressional Districts join Collier County and Lee County with Broward, Palm Beach, Miami/Dade or Monroe County; and WHEREAS, the League of Women Voters and Common Cause have submitted a proposed map that mirrors the map created by the Citizens For Fair Redistricting, a bi- partisan committee; and WHEREAS, other maps have also been proposed that keep Collier County and Lee County joined together as communities of interest; and WI-[EREAS, this Resolution is proposed and supported by Mike Cart, as Chairman of the Collier County Republican Party Executive Committee, and by Chuck Mohlke, as Chairman of the Collier County Democratic Executive Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: On behalf of the citizens of Collier County and in recognition of the protection of Collier County concerns by members of the local legislative delegation (including, but not limited to, Congressman Porter J. Goss, State Representative Dudley J. Goodlette and State Senator Butt L. Saunders) the Board supports litigation, if necessary, to ensure that we are represented by a local congressman, familiar with Ihe common needs economic interests of both counties. APR - This Resolution adopted this/~--,~., day of February, 2002, after motion, second and majority vote. ;-: ....'~;~. ~,.:;'..... · ","' .'.4 ,;~i[ht t~Broc~, C~RK C,. ' ~ Approved as to. fo~ and legal sufficiency: Ramiro Mafialich Chief Assistant County Attorney H/Ra ~t~Resolution~Redistficting BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUN~ BY:Jame~ APR - ~ 2002 L Memorandum To: From: Date: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Leo Ochs, Jr., Assistant County Manager February 13, 2002 Congressional Redistricting Resolution There appears to be some confusion about the specific level of commitment made by the Board as a result of its endorsement of the resolution brought forward at yesterday's meeting by Mr. Carr and Mr. Mohlke. I have attached a copy for your reference. From the stafT's perspective, it is clear that while the Board fully supports the efforts of this bi-partisan group, including litigation if necessary to accomplish its stated objective, it did not consent to directly participating in a potential lawsuit against the State government in this matter. I trust this interpretation is consistent with the intent of the Board. Cc: County Manager County Attorney Office of the County Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER IRRIGATION ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE HOURS OF IRRIGATION IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, approve the Collier County Water Irrigation Ordimnce. CONSIDERATIONS: The protection of water resources is in the best interest of and for the long-term protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the residents, citizens, and visitors to Collier County. Water conservation is an integral part of protecting current and future water resources. Placing certain restrictions on the use of potable water for irrigation is an effective means of conserving water. The Collier County Water Irrigation Ordinance limits the allowable hours of irrigation to promote conservation, to protect water resources, and to reduce the demand upon all sources of water, including sources of water that are used in the production of potable water. The limitations placed on the use of water pursuant to this Ordinance will not create an undue hardship on the users of water fi.om the affected sources. The Ordinance establishes an irrigation schedule based on odd and even property addresses, and allows irrigation on three days per week between 12:01 AM and 8:00 AM. It also allows for low volume hand watering from 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM on the same days that irrigation/s allowed. The ordinance also requires an irrigation system to have a properly installed and operational rain sensor switch to prevent system operation during precipitation events, and incorporates a phase in period of one year to retrofit existing irrigation systems with the rain sensor switches. The provisions of this Ordinance may fi.om time to time be superceded by Emergency Water Shortage Orders from the South Florida Water Management District. The Ordinance is generally consistent with South Florida Water Management District guidelines and with the recently adopted City of Naples Irrigation Ordinance. The Ordinance will be enforced through Section 1-6 of the County's Code of Laws and Ordinances as authorized by {}125.69, Florida Statutes. Each violator of this Ordinance will be issued a Citation that specifies a fine of seventy-five dollars ($75.00) plus applicable costs as specified in the County's Citation Ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be a reduction in potential revenue from the sale of water due to the limitations on the use of water for in'igation that will be placed into effect through the implementation of this Ordinance. The reduction of the demand for potable water will result in a reduction of electricity and chemicals consumed for the production of potable water, thus lowering operating costs. NO. ~ APR 0 9 2002 PG. ! GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact in approving this Irrigation Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District approve the Collier County Water Irrigation Ordinance. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Paul Mattausch, Water Director Tom Wides, Interim Public Utilities Administrator APR 0 9 20 PG. ~ ,. ORDINANCE NO. 2002- WATER IRRIGATION ORDINANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY; RESTRICTING THE HOURS OF WATER IRRIGATION IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY; PROVIDING TITLE AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FINDINGS, PURPOSE, AND DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING IRRIGATION HOURS AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING EXEMPTIONS AND VARIANCE PROCEDURES; PROVIDING PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION LNTO THE COUNTY'S CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, authorizes Boards of County Commissioners to enact ordinances deemed by the respective Board to be necessary to protect the health, safety. and welfare of the residents, citizens, or visitors of the respective County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County has determined that the protection of water resources is in the best interest of and for the long-terra protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the residents, citizens, and visitors to Collier County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier Count7 has also determined that water conservation is an integral part of protecting current and future water resources, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has deemed that placing certain restrictions on the use of water for irrigation is an effective means of conserving water. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM~IISSION'ERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: TITLE. 1.1 This Ordinance shall be called "Thc Collier County Water Irrigation Ordinance." SECTION TWO: FINDINGS. 2.1 Irrigation places a significant demand on water resources of Collier County, including the potable water supply system. 2.2 That adopting this Ordinance to limit allowable hou~ of irrigation is to promote conservation, to protect water resources, and to reduce demand upon all water sources, including sources of water that can be treated to become potable water. 2.3 That restricting allowable houra of irrigation pursuant to this Ordinance will not create undue hardship on the users of water from the affected water sources. SECTION THREE: PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY. 3.1 The primary purpose of this Ordinance is to provide the regulatory framework to assist in conservation of water resources through consistent and urdform application of restrictions on use of water for irrigation in unincorporated Collier County. 3.2 This Ordinance shall be applicable notwithstanding any other Collier County Ordinance. SECTION FOUR: DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply throughout this Ordinance: APR - 9 2002 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 55 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 "County" means Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Board of County Commissioners and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District and GoodIand Water District. "Code Enforcement Officer" means any authorized agent or employee of the County whose duty it is to enforce the County's codes. "Impervious Surfaces" means surfaces that do not allow penetration of water, including, but not limited to, paved or concrete roads, paved or concrete sidewalks, paved or concrete driveways, paved or concrete parking lots, or highly compacted areas including shell or clay. "Irrigation" means the application of water by means other than natural precipitation. "Irrigation Systems" means equipment and/or devices which deliver water to landscaping being irrigated including, but not limited to, pumping stations and controls, control structures, ditches, public or private wells, piping, valves, fittings, and emitters. "Landscaping" means all residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, and governmental areas which are considered as lawns or ornamentally planted, including, but not limited to, sod, grasses, tuff, ground covers, flowers, shrubs, trees, mulch, hedges, and other similar plant materials. "Low Volume Irrigation Systems" means equipment and devices specifically designed to deliver a volume of water consistent with the water requirement of the plant being irrigated and which delivers the water with a high degree of efficiency directly to the root zone of the plant. "Low Volume Hand Watering" means watering attended by one person with one hose equipped with a self-canceling or automatic shutoff nozzle. "Low Volume Mobile Equipment Washing" means the washing of mobile equipment with a bucket and sponge, a single hose with a self-canceling or automatic shutoff nozzle, low volume pressure cleaning equipment, or any combination of the preceding methods of washing. "Low Volume Pressure Cleaning" means pressure cleaning by means of equipment that is specifically designed to reduce the volume of water used as accepted by industry standards. "Pervious Surface" means every improved or unimproved surface that allows water to readily soak into, or recharge, the water aquifer under such surface. "Water Resources" means any and all water on or beneath the surface of the ground, including, but not limited to, natural or artificial watercourses, lakes, ponds, and artificial water features, and water percolating, standing, or flowing beneath the surface of the ground. SECTION FIVE: IRRIGATION HOURS; OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 5.1 All water irrigation activities within the specified geographic arm(s) and within the boundaries as designated in Section Six, and which are not exempted by Section Seven, shall be restricted to the days and hours as specified in Table 1. APR O 9 2002 Table 1. Collier County Water Irrigation Restrictions :Lafi-.ds~al~;L6-tgati6n':=Established~'~./.' ~.~'.'-:;':::~:~:.'::4' :Z. ~ ":: '. ' !:" ;- ~',. ODD Numbered Addresses 3 days each week; Monday, Wednesday, Saturday; 12:01 AM to 8:00 AM for all types of irrigation; 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM for Low Volume Hand Watering. EVEN Numbered Addresses 3 days each week; Tuesday, Thursday, Sunday, 12:01 AM to 8:00 AM for ail types of irrigation; 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM for Low Volume Hand Watering. . ALL Addresses 5 days each week; Monday through Friday, 12:01 AM to 8:00 AM for all types of irrigation; Low Volume Hand Watering allowed anytime. Existing Systems 10 minutes per zone per week; person must be present in zone and workinff on the system durin~ each such operation. New Systems 30 minutes per zone, one time only; person must be present in zone and working; on the system dufin~ such operation. ALL Addresses ] Application shall be coordinated with the scheduled day/time for Landscaping Irrigation; if applied outside of the allowed hours, and "watering in" is specified by the manufacturer of the applied material, a licensed application technician must be on L the premises. ALL Other Outdoor Water Other outdoor water uses, including car, truck, and boat Uses washing and the washing of exterior home surfaces and roofs, shall be allowed anytime with the use of Low Volume Pressure Cleaning Equipment, Low Volume Mobile Equipment Washing and/or water hose equipped with an automatic self-canceling or automatic shutoff nozzle; in all cases, the water used must drain to a pervious surface or to a water recycling/reuse system. 5.2 All water irrigation activities must and shall be operated in an efficient manner so as to not allow water to be applied to any impervious surface. 5.3 All water irrigation systems shall be equipped with a properly installed rain sensor switch. 5.3.1 A rain sensor switch shall be required on all new installations of irrigation systems. 5.3.2 A rain sensor switch shall be retxofitted on existing systems within one (I) year of the effective date of this Ordinance. 5.3.3 The rain sensor switch shall be maintained in fully operational condition at all times by the owner/operator of the irrigation system. 5.4 All water irrigation activities prohibited or restricted from time-to-time by any Water Shortage Emergency Order declared by the South Florida Water Management District and published in a newspaper of general circulation in Collier County pursuant to Section 373.175, Florida Statutes, shall automatically be incorporated into and be enfomeable by application of this Ordinance. Each such Order shall apply to such geographic areas in Collier County as is specified in the respective Order, or if not specified, as otherwise then provided by law. Each Order shall be subject only to such exceptions as are specified in the respective Order, and if not specified therein, as otherwise then provided by law. SECTION SIX: IRRIGATION RESTRICTION AFFECTED AREAS 6.1 The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply only in the unincorporated geographic areas in Collier County. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 36 37 39 40 41 42 43 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 SECTION SEVEN: EXEMPTIONS; VARIANCES 7.1 The following are exempt from all provisions of this Ordinance: 7.1.1 Landscaping irrigation from which the source of the water is 100% reclaimed water. 7.1.2 Landscaping irrigation from which the source of the water is 100% saltwater. 7.1.3 Irrigation wholly from a Low Volume Irrigation System. 7.1.4 Use of Low Volume Mobile Equipment Washing provided all unused water drains into only a pervious ground surface. 7.1.5 Water use to the extent authorized by a specific Consumptive Use Permit, or similar permit, issued to the respective water user by the South Florida Water Management District. 7.2 Any individual's or entity's irrigation that is affected by this Ordinance may make application to the County Water Department Director to request a variance if strict compliance with the restrictions of this Ordinance will impose a unique, unnecessary and inequitable hardship on such irrigation. Variance relief may be granted only upon a written application applying for the variance, which application contains proof that the irrigation hardship is peculiar to that individual, entity, or that affected property; that the hardship is not self-imposed; that the granting of the variance would be consistent with the general intent and purpose of this Ordinance; that the variance is necessary to eliminate an inequitable irrigation hardship; and that each variance shall vary the irrigation restrictions only to the minimum extent required to resolve the unreasonableness of the irrigation hardship that would exist but for the variance. No variance shall be granted unless the applicant is able to persuade the Director or his designee of the necessity for the variance. If the initial decision is made by the Director's designee, the only appeal shall be to the Director, and the Director's decision upon appeal to grant or deny the requested variance shall be further reviewable only as specified in subsection 7.2.1, below. 7.2.1 The County's Water Director, or individual designated by the Water Director, shall be the only individual(s) authorized to grant or deny these variances. A decision to grant or deny the variance should be made within ten (10) days after actual receipt of a complete application for the variance. Denial of a variance request may be appealed to the Public Utilities Division Administrator not later then ten (10) days of actual receipt by the applicant of the decision on the initial request. The Division Administrator's decision upon appeal shall be final. 7.2.2 An application for variance, and/or the granting of a variance, shall operate prospectively and shall not affect any then pending enforcement action pursuant to this Ordinance, or otherwise. SECTION EIGHT: PENALTIES 8.1 Each violator of this Ordinance shall be issued a citation that specifies a fine of seventy-five dolla~ ($75.00'3, plus any then applicable costs as specified in the citation issued pursuant to procedures of the Collier County's Citation Ordinance. The applicable fine shall be $75.00 notwithstanding that said Ordinance specifies tines that always exceed $75.00. Persons who commit repeat violations may also be punished pursuant to § 162.21, Florida Statutes, as a civil infraction with a maximum civil penalty not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00). Any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance shall also be subject to the County's remedies as authorized by § 125.69, Florida Statutes, Section 1- 6 of the County's Code of Laws and Ordinances, or as otherwise then allowed by law. The applicable penalties shall be determined by the forum selected to enforce the violation. AG~ f~A IT~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 44 45 46 47 48 .49 51 52 53 8.1.1 Each day, or pm thereof commencing at noon of the respective day, that a violation of this Ordinance occurs by the same individual or entity may be deemed by the finder of fact to constitute a separate violation. 8.1.2 All monies collected pm~uant to this Ordinance shall be used by the Code Enforcement Department to fund continued and enhanced enforcement of this Ordinance and/or other County Ordinances then under its jurisdiction. SECTION NINE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY The. fnovisions of this Ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purposes in the interest of punk: health and to protect the water resources of Collier County. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. SECTION TEN: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relenered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION ELEVEN: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ~ day of ,2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk JAMES N. COLETTA, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Thong' ~. ~a~meJ Assistant County Attrmmy APR O 9 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD OBJECTIVE: To appoint 1 member to fulfill the remainder of a vacant term, expiring on June 30, 2003, on the Contractors Licensing Board. CONSIDERATIONS: This 9 member board determines the qualifications of applicants for the various categories of the Contractors' Certificates of Competency. They also hold hearings to determine ir'the holder of a certificate of competency of any contractor, master or journeyman should be disciplined. A minimum 3 members shall be in the category of "Consumer". The consumer representatives may be any resident o£the local jurisdiction that is not, and has never been, a member or practitioner of a profession regulated by the board or a member of any closely related profession. Members are required to file a Form 1 Statement of Financial Interests each year with the Supervisor of Elections. Terms are 3 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. Ms. Carol Pahl resigned from the CLB on December 28, 2001. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 2 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM. Leonard Cutler I Consumer 3 Yes None Aldo Rosa [ Consumer 3 Yes None COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Quasi Judicial- No Recommendation FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the requests for appointment, appoint 1 member, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointment. Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Agenda Date: APRIL 9, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SER VICES DMSION BUILDING REVIEW AND PERMI2~NG 28oo North Horseshoe Driue Naples, FL 341o4 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: August 21, 2001 Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Ed Perico, Director ~.3 Building Review & Permitting Department Contractors' Licensing Board I have reviewed the resumes for the Contractors' Licensing Board and listed the specific categories they are qualified for. They are as follows: Leonard Cutler 5010 Kingston Way Naples, FL 34119 Consumer Aldo Rosa 9815 Clear Lake Circle Naples, FL 34109 Consumer If I can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me at 403-2442. j~ttme Contractors Licensing Board IVork Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate Mr. Kenneth Lloyd 5408 Freeport Lane Naples, FL 34119 District: 3 Category: Consumer Mr. Gary F. Hayes 341 Airport Road North Naples, FL 34104 Distri~: 4 Category: Specialty Contractor/Plumbing Mr. Kenneth H. Dunne 133 Sharwood Drive Naples, FL 34110 District: 2 Category: Engineer 430-6900 594-8685 Mr. Michael D. Baril 832 Rose Court Marco Island, FL 34145 District: 1 Category: General Contractor 09/11/01 06/30/04 Mr. Waiter Mitchell Crawford, I 1280 Venetian Way Naples, FL 34110 D£vtrict: 2 Category: General Contractor Term 2nd Term 3 Years co43-2431 09/26/95 06/30/96 -1Year 05/25/99 06/30/02 3 Years 11/27/01 06/30/04 3 Years 571-5280 594-0269 642-8755 11/27/01 596-0291 597-9604 06/30/04 3 Years 06/13/00 06/30/03 3 Years Mr. Richard E. Joslin, Jr. 455-5000 595 13th Street, N.W. Naples, FL 34120 District: 5 Cat.goo': Licensed Commercial Pool/Spa Contr 06/11/96 06/30/97 1 Year 06/13/00 06/30/03 3 Years l~.'ednesday, November 28, 2001 Page I of 2 Name Contractors Licensing Board Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate Term 2nd Term Ms. Sara Beth White 346 Pirate's Bight Naples, FL 34103 District: 4 Categoo,: Consumer Ms. Carol Pahl f~'~ 2501 Sailors Way Naples, FL 34109 District: 3 Category: Consumer Representative Mr. Les Dickson 202 Monterey Drive Naples, FL 34119 District: 3 Category: Roof'mg Contractor 571-3345 05/25/99 06/30/02 3 Years 649-8828 02/09/99 06/30/00 1 Year 597-3759 06/13/00 06/30/03 3 Years 643-1616 06/11/96 06/30/99 3 Years 05/25/99 06/30/02 3 Years This 9 member board was created by Ord. No. 78-2, 85-42, 90-105, 92-61 to determine the qualifications of applicants for the various categories of the Contractors' Certificates of Competency. They also hold hearings to determine if a certificate of competency of any contractor, master or journeyman should be revoked. A minimum of 2 members shall reside within the corporate city limits of Naples or shall be recommended to the Bec by the Naples City Council. FI Stat, Sec 489.131, sub 10 states that 3 members must be consumer representatives. Membership should be licensed architect, licensed general contractor, licensed engineer, licensed electrical contractor, licensed plumbing contractor, licensed roofing contractor, licensed residential or building contractor and a licensed representative from one of the other specialty trades or professions requiring a Certificate of Competency as provided in the Ordinance. These categories are merely directory and failure to have a member of each of the trades is not grounds for voiding any action of the Board. Terms are 3 years. This is a Quasi Judicial Board. Amended by Ordinance No. 94-34, 95-11, 97-68, 99-45 FL STAT 489 Staff: Ed Peri(o, Building Review & Pertaining Director:.: 403-2400 l, Vednesday, November 28, 2001 Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: March 15, 2002 Elections Office ~ Sue Filson, Executive Manage Board of County Commissioners Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD COMMISSION DISTRICT Leonard Cutler 5010 Kingston Way Naples, FL 34119 Aldo Rosa 9815 Clear Lake Circle Naples, FL 34109 Thank you for your help. MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: March 15, 2002 Ed Perico, Building Review & P~tt'mg Director Sue Filson, Executive Manage~f~/t Board of County Commissiorle~- Contractors Licensing Board As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Leonard Cutler 5010 Kingston Way Naples, FL 34119 Aldo Rosa 9815 Clear Lake Circle Naples, FL 34109 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee within the 41 day time-flame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Pleaa~al~orize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774-8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF Attachments Pg. {£ ~rlene Cut,er ~ p. 1 Mar 12 02 09: 1Sa Is~arld Walk ,:,.*-"-~ ~-,.] "~ ~ 5010 Kingston Way Napl~. ~ ~t1~9~2 Tel; ~1 59~2274 :;,~" Cell: ~1 272~D6 F~1598~92 . .; ... .. , .:. -....~._. ~1: ~n~~ FAX To: Sue Filson, Execute Manager From: Leonard Cutler F~ 941 774-3602 Page.~. 2 ~. Da~: 3/12_/2002 Re: CC: I~ Urgent [] For Review /-] Please Comment [] Please Reply [] PI~ Recycle Sue: My comp/eted application for The Contractors Licensing Board Advisory Cornmi~ee is attached. If you need any aclaitJonal information to consider my application, Please call me. would appreciate your acknowledgement of receipt of my applk'-~fion. A simple FAX will do it Thanks. Hap 12 02 08: 1Sa Mar 08 02 ll:3Sa Rrlene Cutler Sue Filson 941 -774-88S5 p.2 p.1 Board of County Commissioners 3301 East 'I'amiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 {941 ) 774-8097 Fax: (94]) 774-3602 Application for Advisory Committees/Boards . *" -- ' . · . , Board or Committ~ A~p~ied fo~_ ~ Art you s re~I~red voler iu Collier Count: Do you cur~ntly ~M publ~ o~e? Y~ Do Yon I~ ~ or ~ you ~ ~ ~ a CaUter C~n~ ~ or ~~ YM No P~sc ~l ~our ~o~mu~fy aeflv~ (c~ ~7~ ~ C ~ ' 83/8'8120~ 17:47 19415148961 ALDQ RE)SA P~GE 82 03/08/2002 17:47 19415140961 ALDO ROSA PAGE 63 1,::1002 ~stabli~h a ~ l~x~ ~ afterits (lesintcii~ ~.~ lit. I am also Akl~-Re~ 2002 __ 03_______/0__~8/.2002 !7: ~? lS~lS140SGi ALDO ROSA PAGE 84 Alto Commodities ln~. wc~s eslablished as a recogn'rzed business enflJY and consulian) in em(~'gtJng inJemationoJ futures ~eis. My e~ed~8 o~ an international F~ures commis~on M~an( and fl~r ~oker enabled our cijenJ base ~o g~W- Bu~ne~ 19~msent MCO co~oomES INC. g~ YORK, N~ YO~K F~ident and found~ of ~c~ Commodities thC., a du~ registe~d Ame~an Futures comm~on ~erchan~ in gecemb~ 1979- 19~-1~1 ~den~ a~ Founder of ~CO co~oDm~, ~EICH, SW~E~ND 19~1-1991 p~d~t ~nd Found~ of ~CO ~9~- present JOSA cO~ODm~ INC. N~ P~sident Emeritus and founder Rosa Commodities, Inc. floor b~ke~ge the CommodiW ~change Cent~. NeW Yo~ NY Ame~Cmn ~kerage OMPAN~, N~ ~OEK. NEW YOEK 196~enf ALDO ~ EOSA ~ ~ ...... ~cin~ comm~ion house se~ice to ~e~can '-- '- e ~Y ~ ~' ~ · 19~-began ~ading on re~ulafed United Stot~ aommodiW exohange~ FutUre ~ch~ge Member~pCs) Hew Yo~ ~d of l~de Inc. NeW Yo~ Fgtu~s ~ch~nge, I~ Hew Y~ M~anflle ~change. inc. Futures E~hange Cornm'dtee(s) Since 1963, served on various Exchange self-regulatory committees (please see affc~:hrnent for chronologyJ- · 03/08/2002 17:47 !9~15140951 AL_DO ROSA PAGE 05 Aldo A. Rosa 9815 Clear Lake 941-514-8650 Futures Exclmnge Committee(s) New York Cof~, Sugar, & Cocoa Exclmnge., Iae. 1967-1971 1967-197"/ t977-1981 1975-1,979 Boa~ of M~atgets Bv. siaess C~4~ Committ, e 1975-1981 Finale Commilto~ 1981-1985 Aa_mission Committee 1989-1995 A~~ ~mi~e 1~ 1-1995 Bo~ of M~~ 199t-1~7 F~ ~~ New York Futures Exchange, Inc. 1991-1993 board of lvlanagers New York Cotton Exchange, lac. 1983-1987 Board of Manab~-rs 1983-1989 Admissionz Committee 1983-1985 Ba.qiness Conduct Commillae New York M~camile Exchange, Inc. 198%1991 Board of Man~ 1991-1993 Admi~on.s c~_mmirtee References Walux L Banard Vice Presidem North~a Tnl~ B~ K. evia G. Coleman GOODI.KT, COLEMAN& JOHNSON, P.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE IMMOKALEE ENTERPRiSE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (EZDA) OBJECTIVE: To appoint 3 members to the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency. CONSIDERATIONS: This 13 member committee was created on March 28, 1995, by Ordinance 95-22 to induce private investment into distressed areas to create economic opportunities and sustainable economic development for designated areas. To permit Collier County to participate in this program, the Board of County Commissioners nominated the Immokalee Community to be considered by the Florida Department of Commerce for Enterprise Zone designation in Resolution No. 95-248, approved March 28, 1995. As part of the formal application for an Enterprise Zone, the State required that a committee consisting of a broad base of citizens be established. The committee has representation-from the Chamber of Commerce, financial or insurance entities, businesses operating within the nominated area, residents living within the nominated area, nonprofit community-based organizations operating within the nominated area, local private industry council, local code enforcement agency, and local law enforcement agency. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. The terms for Mr. W. Herman Spooner and Sgt. Robert Asbell expired on April 4, 2002 and a resignation was received from Mr. William P. Dillon, leaving 3 vacancies. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 3 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY. DIST ELECTOR Lt. Mark Bak~ Local Law Enforcement Charlie Esquivel Local Business in the Zone Resides in Lehigh Carla Ayaia Local Bus]ness in the Zone 5 Yes COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Lt. Mark Baker, Law Enforcement Officer - 04/04/06 Charlie Esquivel, Local Business - 04/04/06 Carla Ayala, Local Business - 04/04/05 NOTE: Ch. 290.0056 F.S., Section 2, spells out the type of representation required on EZDA boards', including at least one member who has a business operating in the zone and one member who is a resident of the zone. Other than these two requirements, the State does not dictate local residency requirements. It also states that one member must represent the local private industry council which, in our case, in located in Ft. Myers, which means that this particular board member is actually a Lee County resident. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPAC,T.: NONE RECOM .MENDATIO ,N: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the r~'~ommendation for appointment, appoint 3 members, and direct the County Attom. eY to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments. Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners AGENDA ITEM ,t,:.'R ? """ l..',.,32 Pg ....! Memorandum To: FROM: DATE: RE: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of Count~7/mmissioners Helene Caseltin4; CED, Economic Development Manager Housing & Urban Improvement -- March 12, 2002 Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency (EZDA) Appointments The State has enacted a program, the Florida Enterprise Zone Program, to induce private investment into distressed areas to create economic opportunities and sustainable economic development for designated areas. To permit Collier County to participate in this program, the Board of County Commissioners nominated the Immokalee community to be considered by the Florida Department of Commerce for Enterprise Zone designation in Resolution No. 95-248, which was approved March 28, 1995. As part of the formal application for an Enterprise Zone, the State required that a committee consisting of a broad base of citizens be established. This Board has representation from the Chamber of Commerce, financial or insurance entities, businesses operating within the nominated area, residents living within the nominated area, nonprofit community-based organizations operating within the nominated area, local private industry council, local code enforcement agency, and local law enforcement agency. The Committee was created through Ordinance 95-22 as the Immokaiee Enterprise Zone Development Agency (EZDA). In addition, the County Commission appointed members to the EZDA under Resolution 95-249. More recently, Resolution #2001-98 was adopted on 3/27101 creating the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board, whose members also serve on the EZDA. The EZDA is recommending the following people for Board approval: o Lt. Mark Baker, of the Immokalee Sub-station, to serve as the "local law enforcement" representative, taking the place of Sgt. Robert Asbel whose term expires on 4/3/02. This position must be filled with a Collier County law enforcement officer and Lt. Baker meets this requirement. Mr. Charlie Esquivel, Manager of the Krehling Industries plant in Immokalee, taking the place of Mr. Herman Spooner whose term expires on 4/4/02. This position must be filled with a local business in the zone, and Mr. Esquivel meets this requirement. Ms. Carla Ayala, of CNE Contractors and owner of commercial rental property, to replace Bill Dillon, who recently resigned from the EZDA. Ms. Ayala would serve out the remainder of Mr. Dillon's term, until 9/11/05. This position must be filled with a local business in the zone, and Ms. Ayala meets this requirement, t ~.AG~ _~M~__ Memo - Sue Filson March 12, 2002 Page two For your information, Mr. Tony Sanchez has also recently indicated that he is resigning as an "Ex- Officio" member of the EZDA, though I have not yet received an official.resignation letter. He has suggested that Mr. Pete Aguilar, Assistant Manager of the Seminole Indian Casino, as his replacement, but I have not received a completed application from him as yet either. Please prepare an Executive Summary for the Board's consideration of the recommendations and let me know if any further information or assistance is needed to initiate the process. Thank you for your help. Attachments: Applications from the three recommended appointees cc: Raymond Holland, EZDA Chairman Fred Thomas, Immokalee CRA Advisory Board Chairman Joe Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development and Environmental Services Denny Baker, Interim Director, Housing and Urban Improvement Marlene Foord, Principal Planner, Collier County Planning Services Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term Mr. Fred N. Thomas, ]r. 1800 Farm Worker Way Immokalee, FL 34142 District: 5 Category: Non Profit Organization C:~?-3649 04/04/95 04/04/96 1 Year 09/11/01 04/04105 4 Years Ms. Lucy Ortiz 606 Roberts Avenue Immokalee, FL 34142 Distr/~: 5 Category: Non Profit Organization 262-4404 04/04/95 _ 04/04/99 657-5617 03/23/.99 - 04/04/03 Mr. Ira J. Malamut 11990 Wedge Drive Ft. Myers, FL 33913 District: Category: Non-profit Organization 4 Years 4 Years Mr. Jerry Hubbart P.O. Box 267 Fekia, FL 33930 District: Category: Business in Zone 658-3560 03/23/99 04/04/03 4 Years Mr. Raymond T. Holland P.O. Box 5324 lmmokalee, FL 34143 District: 5 Category: Finanical Entity Mr. W. Herma~ Spooner 806 N. 1.5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 District: 5 Category: Business Owner & Resident 03/23/99 04/04/03 4 Years 656-3505 675-3747 657-3171 04/01/97 04/04/01 4 Years 6574568 09/11/01 04104/05 4 Years 657-2569 08105197 04/04/98 03114/98 04104/02 I Year 4 Years Thursday, Septt~ni~er 13, 2001 Page I of 3 Name lmmokalee Enterprise Zone DevelOpment Agency Work Phone ~ppt'd Exp. Date Home Phone DateRe-appt 2n .dExpDate Term 2nd Term Mr. Floyd Crews P.O. Box 610 Immokalee, FL 34143 District: 5 Category: Resident/business 657-2429 11/24/98 04/04/99 2 Years 03/23/99 04/04/03 4 Years Mr. Alan W. Neuman 1653 South Fountainhead Road Ft. Myers, FL 33919 District: 5 Category: Private Industry Council Mr. William P. Dillon .?c3~ ~..~weoo ~ 12/14/99 -~J,, .... C~'-t~ #22.'-7 596-8727 09/11/01 Naples, FL 34109 District: 2 481-8020 08/05/97 04/04/99 03/23/99. _ 04/04/03 Category: Attorney Mr. Casey Wolff 261-0544 4951 Gulf Shore Boulevard, Apt. 1701 Naples, FL 34103 District: 4 Category: Immigxation Law 04104/01 04/04/05 2 Years 4 Years 2 Years 4 Years 09/28/99 04/04/03 3.5 Years Sgt. Robert Asbel, Jr. 657-6168 02/03/98 112 South 1st Street lmmokalee, FL 34142 District: 5 Category: Local Law Enforcement Mr. John Kirchner 3524575 07/28/98 3311 Golden Gate Boulevard, E. 03/23/99 Naples, FL 34120 District: 5 Category: Immokalee Chamber of Commerce 04/04/02 04/04/99 04/04/03 4 Years 8 Months 4 Years Thursday, Sep~tmaber 13, 2001 Page 2 of 3 lmmokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term ~ ltome Phone DateRe-appt 2n~. xpDate 2nd Term Ms. Dora ¥idaur~i 106 S. First Street, Suite 103 lmmokalee, FL 34142 District: Category: Local Code Enforcement 657-2525 09/I 1/01 04/04/03 2 Years Ms. Denise Blanton 657-3306 14700 Immokalee Road Immokalee, FL 34120 District: 5 Category: non-voting ex-oflScJo member Mr. Tony Sanchez, Jr. 658-1313 506 South First Street Immokalee, FL 34142 District: 5 Category: Business/Minority/EX OFFICIO 12/09/97 00/00/00 unlimited 12/14/99 This 13 member committee was created on Apdl 4, 1995, by Ord. No. 95-22 to induce private investment into di~¢-_~-~e__-d areas to create economic opportunities and sustainable economic deveto0ment for designated areas. Initial members were appointed by Resolulion No. 95-249. To permit Collier County to participate in this program, the Board of County Commissioners nominated the Immokalee Community to be considered by the FL Dept. of Commerce for Enterprise Zone designation in Reso. No. 95-248, approved March 28, 1995. As part of the formal app for an EZ, the State required that a committee consisting of a broad base of citizens be established. The committee has representation from the Chamber of Commerce, financial or insurance entities, businesses operating within the nominated area, residents, nonprofit community-based organizations, local private industry council, local code enforcement agency, and local law e~forcement aoencv. Amended bv Ord. No. 97-81 Terms are 4 veam. FL STAT 290.001 - 290.016 Staff.' Greg Mihalic, HUI Director:. 405-2330 Thursday, September 13, 2001 Page 3 of 3 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: March 15, 2002 Elections Office ~ Sue Filson, Executive Manager ' Board of County Commissioners Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointmems The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the cotmrdssion district in which each applicant resides. EZDA Clara Ayala 5720 Copper Leaf Lane Naples, FL 34116 COMMISSION DISTRICT Thank you for your help. MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: March 15, 2002 Helene Caseltine, CED, Economic Development Manager Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency (EZDA) As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-re/Erenced 'advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Clara Ayala 5720 Copper Leaf Lane Naples, FL 34116 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointmem of the advisory committee within the 41 day time-frame, and I will prepare an executive sunmmr~ for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774-8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF Attachments FROM,: Mar. 01 2002 09:14AM PI BC, C ,for Advisory Commitie~/Boa~s 87/Dg/2D81 1~:07 7743~82 BCC for Advisory Committees/Boards PAGE al Mar 06 02 09: 1Sa CME DRY~IRLL 87,.'89/2881 1~:07 7743682 BCC PAGE 81 : I for Advisory Committees/Boards' . ... . .... . -=.. ....~.;. ':=~ ...-.. .-.. ...... '.. . '',' : ..'- :. :.. .'. ' ..:: .: .'; ...... -. . · ' ' '~. ".'~'~'f: ;':. ~', '.. "'l~ :'~ '"C ~:'... "::.'.~.":" . :.:'"'.: ' ~-.':-:'. ".".~ '~: ' . .... ·. '" ~' - ~" ' ' ' '' , ' . * ' ' . 'q .' ' i '. .... ..'. . ' ' .'., ."'.'' - '. . 1 . .~ · '.' ' .;' ': . .' , ': L' .' . .: ' .'~: "'.:' · . '.' . : ' ' · :" ". 2 .'.'2~:~':'".. '' .1 ' . '.' . ~.. ~ .~""'..' ...: .' ..: .... .. .'.,. .'.. . ....' , ..... · .... . . · ~ · ' ' ' '" ~ ; '/'"':"' · '."".'.' · ....... . ' ' - . -'- " · · : ~~~~ - ... ..,;.~.~ . · . . .... ~ -. :. : : - . ;. · . .:. ~ .% .... . ...:, . . · . : - ~,.... . , , . . . · ': '.'~-'-'": - ' ~ '.: .' ~:.] ...' .: . .:-., ..'..' : ...... ... :.: ~'v. -' . '-. "" ' ':':'~"'" ' '"""':" ' "" '"i'" · ~ -- .'. = ~ ?- . , : -'.E. ' ' ', ,,' .'.. · . ,.':.t .... · '.t.. .~......,-. .. .: ..... .~. ., , .~:.. ~ . . .... ..- : . ..... : ' "3 .... -.'.' ........ :' " .' · ~ · , "' ~ .'-'' :,,.~.: ~ . ':~": " ."' " ' · ' · ' ,~ . . : '~. .. ,.. , ..... .' . : · · , -... · : .. ._ . :.~2 . : :.. , .'.... · ., ,. . _. _ _ _. . _ ..~. :i . : .. . -7.'... -' '.~ ,~ ' , . .:~¥......~ "~-.:' .. ' ..: '. · · :. : .,':..'.'.F.~-; · . '. .... .~ [..:' . l~ '.' '' .' '.' '-': '.= ~-" i":" .... ~ '~ . ;'~' '-", '7 ':-.'~,: , . '" ... '. "" '~'~. : - ' · .' '-- ' "=~ '~'."..t.' : ','" : · - - . ~-' =' : . "' -' -' ' ~ ' ., - .... ..,:: :'.. ' . : ' ' ., . ... :_ ..~ ; .... ~... ~........ .., .,. . ,. ,,. .~ , ,.: , . ,-.,~ "4. , ,. . . ..,...~. ,~ ~'. ~. . .: '~: ...~..· ~-.. ..,. . . ... . ., .. . . .., .,,~, ,. ; ' :~.[.:,:,(~._.... ': .... _ '-.. ~ , .4,' ~' t .- . · .. · : · . .....,..,,, :. -,., ....... . . :. : . .. ..' . , . ~. .. .~..,. · .... .. :~. ..'~' ,. ......:- .,.. , ' - ' ·" .' ~ " . ' :'..'. :-: .... 7-~:.:'.-.'5 "','.-:..':' -' ~' ' ', ','~-,-', ~-:~ .:' ~'i. . :... . . . .'m · .:.~[ . '. i ::~:."..~. : .. ~ . . .-'.. ', ..... . ... ...., . . - .... . .. . . . .: - . ....':. .... '.2.....,' .. · ... ~. _ - . . .~~~~~r~~,~.~..:.....~-,.:..?~::.::-.,. :. ::.~-...., ..:......... :-... .~ ~..~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO TIlE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OBJECTIVE: To appoint 1 member to fulfill the remainder of a vacant term, expiring on October 1, 2004, on the Collier County Planning Commission. CONSIDERATIONS: This 9 member committee assists in the formulation and review of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Land Development Code, and amendments to both, and then submits their recommendations to the Board for final decision. Members are required to file a Form 1, Statement of Financial Interest each year with the Supervisor of Elections. Terms are 4 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. Joyceanna J. Rautio resigned from the CCPC on January 4, 2002. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 4 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM. Peter Lehmann Commission District 2 2 Yes Code Enforcement Board .. Frank J. Fry Commission District 2 2 Yes None Aldo A. Rosa Commission DisWict 2 2 Yes None Sally Barker Commission Dislxict 2 2 Yes Smart Growth Advisory Committee COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: No Recommendation FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Co-m-dasion~s consider the request for appointment, appoint 1 member, and direct the County Altorney to prepare a resolution confirm~g the appointment. Prepaid By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of Coumy Agenda Date: APRIL 9, 2002 Memorandum To; From: Date: Re; Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Susan Murray, AICP, Interim Director, Planning Services Department April 1, 2002 CCPC Vacancies As an advisory board which makes decisions on quvsi-judicial land use petitions, the Collier County Planning C o:nmission voted unanimously against making recommendations for speci ii c applicants to fill vacancies on the Planning Commission. Based on my review of ti~.c a:tached resumes and back up material, all of the candidates appear qualified, providec a!i reside within the appropriate commission district boundaries. I have attaci'~cct spreadsheet summarizing pertinent information for each of the applicants. Joseph K. SctmaJtt. Administrator Crmmnmily Deveiovment & ~ Services Division 0 0 ~ O~ ~ m '~ .---" ~ g r~ :,o-o o · - -- .0. "' E ._o .o ~ ~ '~ E: u) >,._ o o n c: 8D:D ~n,'n- mO: c E- ,,n ._o~ 0 -~" O~ ~ 0 '~ ce',_ .-- m §~ §~o_E E 8 '= "'~: n on,' O U~OU- n,'n~ ~ > 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~Z ~Z Collier County Planning Commission Name Ms. Lora Jean Young 1268 N. Collier Boulevard Marco Island, FL 34145 District: 1 Category: Commission District Mr. Russell A. Budd 5981 14th Avenue, N.W. Naples, FL 34119 District: 3 Category: Commission District Mr. David J. Wolfley 4250 1st Avenue, N.W. Naples, FL 34119 District: 3 Category: Commission District Mr. Kenneth L. Abernathy 4200 Belair Lane, Apt. ! 0g Naples, FL 34103 l)/str/~t: 4 Category: Co,_,~,~ission Disxrict Mr. Paul Midney 1807 Roberts Avenue I/nmokalee, FL 34142 /)/str/~: 5 Category: Co,,.mission ~ Mr. Mark P. Strain 3675 Third Avenue, N.W. Naples, FL 34120 /~tr/ct: 5 ~: Commimion ~ Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term 642-5925 09/12/00 10/01/03 3 Years 643-6527 09/21/93 10/01/97 4 Years 504-3012 09/25/01 10/01/05 4 Years 455-2363 05/22/01 10/01/03 455-6116 263-42.95 2 Years + 09/29/99 10/01103 4 Years or~-al}oo 09125101 10101/05 4 Ym 09111/01 10101104 !~ge l of 2 3 Years Collier County Planning Commission Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term Mr. Dwight Richardson 725 101 st Avenue, North Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Cat~ory: Commission District Ms. loyceanna J. Rautio, et~ 10261 Windsor Way r~5'Sv~,' 0~ NapE's, FL 34109 I~'~ Diatrict: 2 C_.ate~ory: Commission District Mr. Lindy Adelstein 239-1Palm Drive Naples, FL 34112 Dhtrict: 1 Cat~ory: Commission District 594-5341 591-1130 597-6481 732-0966 11/14/00 10/01/04 4 Years 09/29/99 10/01/00 1 Year 09/26/00 10/01/04 4 Years 09/25/01 10/01/05 4 Years This 9 member committee was created by authority of Chapter 67-1246, Laws of FL. On 09/03/85 the BCC adopted Res. No. 85-190, expressing intent to consider an ordinance consolidating functions of Coastal Area Planning Commission and Immokalee Area Planning Commission into CCPC. On 09/24/~, Ord. No. 85-51 created the CCPC, a~hich was repealed Core--stye Lan{! Use Plan, Land Development Code, and amendments to both, and then ~ulxnits their recommendations to the Board for final decision. Members are required to file a Form 1 Slalement of Fir~acial Interest each year with the Supervisor of Elections. Terms are 4 FL STAT ~;teff: Susan Mun-ay, Current Planning Manager:. 403-2300 l~ge 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2002 TO: FROM: Elections Office ~ Sue Filson, Executive Manag Board of County Commissioners Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. COl,HER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Peter Lehmann 67 Johnny Cake Drive Naples, FL 34110 COMMISSION DISTRICT Frank J. Fry 6732 Pelican Bay Boulevard Naples, FL 34108 Aldo A. Rosa 9815 Clearlake Circle lqap~ FL 34109 141 West Street Naples, FL 34108 Thank you for ~ur help. MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: March 15, 2002 Susan Murray, Currem Planning M~er Sue Filson, Executive Manag_ ~er ,~/'.~ Board of County Commission~ ~ ' Collier County Planning Commission As you know, we currently have a vacancy on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Peter Lehmarm 67 Johnny Cake Drive Naples, FL 34110 Frank J. Fry 6732 Pelican Bay Boulevard Naples, FL 34108 Aldo A. Rosa 9815 Clearlake Circle Naples, FL 34109 Sally Barker 141 West Street Naples, FL 34108 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee within the 41 day time-frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Piea~ ~mt~ori~e the ~ppli~mnt~ in ~r~ of ~l~erti~e. If you have any questions, please call me at 774-8097. Thank you for your attention lo thi.q matter. SF ~nts L MAR--15--2002 06 : 1~ PM LEHMANN. ASSOCIATES. INC 941 598 904~ P. 02 56'33 nttnnd l=llvd, '1'~|.: 94 [.~g3 100 F~x: ~41,598.9043 To: Ms. Sue Fillon, Adminlltr~tlve Atll~Mnt From: P. Lehmnnn BOARD Of; COUNTY COMMI~IONER8 FX No,: 3301 Tamlaml Trail Eaet, Naple., Florlde 34112 Date: March Fax.: (g4t) '7'74,-3602 I~. Pga: $ (Incl. Re: COLUER COUNTY PLANNINO COMMISION - Dl~ct 2 Vacancy MESSAGE: Ms. Rlaon: Please __,acce_ pt the attached apptic, etlon and _r,,~__.me as f~,~at al~iCation to the above mfemmed ~xr~nlssi~, as de.led in your February 22, 2002 press release. Shou/d further irTformaUon be reqL~red, please advise m~ at your eerlk~ o~x:xtunl["y i:ba,~ectfutly, ~. Peter Lehma'~- ~.. MAR--l.$--2002 06 : 14 PM L£HMANN. ASSOCIATES. INC 941 598 904~ P. 02 Board of County Commissioners .I r--~ 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL ~4112 (941) 7'74-~0~? Fix: (~41) ??4-3602 Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Home Phons: -.~ Catelu~y Ofal~Hcable): ,, .' -' -~--'-~ Ara ~ a ~~ ~ ~ C~r Co~: Y~ ~ ..... ~ you c~ ~M pu~ o~? Yes No No Flame Bs* yum* esmmam~ a~I (elv~ elnlm maiShbarlmad I~ et, e. smd pasimna MAR--1S--200£ 06 : 15 PM LEHMANN. ASSOCIATES- INC 9~i 598 904~ P. 0S LEHMANN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Con~ruvtios Con~lmm~ Commercial / Residential Project Management / Confection Sul~rvtston / Contract Admint~ration Pnoduct Development/.tnzpectton Services / Construction Litigation 5633 Strand Boulevard Naples, Florida 34110 Tel.: (941j $98-$1 O0 Key Personnel Peter Lehmann, President Mr. Lehmarm is licensed in. Engineering (Intern), C~neral Contractin~ and Building Code Administration and Building Inspections. He has extensive knowledge of project management, construction supervision, inspection proe~lures, governing codes and standards, building condition assessments, defect claim analysis, and related principles, l-It is proficient in Comract Administr~on and handles Project M~nAgen~mt, Archit~,dEngineer Oversight, Cora~raction Supervision, Construction Inspections and Constmmion Litigation. P~r has been a supervisor of architecture/engineering, construction, insl~--tiort, and QC activiti~ for commercial, industrial, and residential projects in excess of $300+ million worth of' constru~ion in both domestic and international markets. He is President of L~hmann & Aaaociates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in conduction ralat~d is,~ues of project manageracnt, construction supervi~ioa, project design & development, value engineering analysis, inspection services, cOnstruction litigation, dm~t claim analysis, ~ wim~ss ~e~iiioay, and construction trainirig. As production mana~r for a national tgm~der, he was respo_~6hle for nnmagmnem. of oorpomte ope~o~ in=Xa~c of land dew4~, product dmign & ~ sales & mnrk~ing, axld t:~on at:fi~. Peter was VP ~on / ~ ~r U.S. Home Corp. for commercial and residential t:onsmaction nad quality ~ activities. Wor~g f~ an ~n~g rmmalting ~m. l~ lind project management ~ili~y for a broad range of~ projects inrAMing r~ commercial, and indu.nu~ planning; foreasic en~g and insp~tion semites; con.~ruction litigation; comract Peter is a Registered ~mml Engim~ lmem, in aim State of ~o6~; a C~ ~! Con~ for ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~fi~ B~ldi~ In--or ~h Sou~em B~d~g C~e C~ ~~ a ~ ~o~ ~~ RC~ ln~or; ~d a~m~ ~MA's~~s~~T~ ~PAT). He ~~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ s~ of ~~ ~ ~ FRANK J. FRY 6732 Pelican Bay Blvd., Naples, Florida 34108 Home Telephone: (941) $91-17~8 I~TIRED CABLE TV CONSULTANT Full time resident of Collier County since 1988 Formerty of Elm Grove, Wiscons~u BUSINESS EXPF_~II~.NCE: 1986-1998 McDONALD INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.; Birmingham, Alabama Director of Community ~fairs: Responsible for obtaining all new franchises and re-negotiating existing franchises, also responsible for obtaining transfers and approvals when cable systems were sold. Worked extensively with public officials of Counties, Cities, and Villages in community and subscriber relations, and problem solving of table related issues. Midwest Regional Manager:. Responsible for cable systems in Iowa and Ohio including nine separate offices, 21 franchises and approximately 60,000 subscribers. Duties included hiring and training managers, implementing marketing and sales campaigns and acting as General Manager of the Chillicothe~ Ohio system. 1981-1984 R.V.S. CABLKVISION CORP.; Wauwatesa, Wisconsin Assistant to the General Manager Director of Marketing and Sales Manager Director of Commercial Mtrketing Director ofPm~hasing & Warehouse Manager F~ Comc~m Coordinator ~LM GROVE REALTY, INC. Owner / Operator Specializing in rmMemlai r~! estate hies. WOODLAND REALTY, INC. Vice President / Owner Specializing in residential real mute. GENERAL HOMES, LNC. and LAMI'I.IGHTER HOMES, INC. Owner / Operator Specializing in residential buikiing companies. GEN-HO CONSTRUCTION, INC. Owner / Operator Spcclmlizing in light commercial ~m~. ALUMA-FORM & CONCRETE FRODUC'FS OF WISCONSIN, INC. Owner / Operator Selling construction supplies. FRANK J. FRY (Continued) Page Two ADDITIONAL EXPERFEN CE: Part T~ne instructor:. Waukesha County Technical Institute Trmtee: Village of Elm Grove, Wisconsin Voluateer Fireman: TAm Grove, Wismnlin PROFRS$1ONAL ASSOCIATIONS: Wiaeoaain Builders Aasociafion, 1970 Presideat Milwaukee Buiider~ A~mr. intion, 1968 Pre,klein Milwaukee Builders Association, Asaociate Advisory Board, 1961 President National Aa~ociatioe of Home Builder~ 1968-1971 Bom'd of Directors Former Member of: MBwaukee and Waukesha Wisconsin Boards of gealtors & Naples Area Board of Realtors- Licensed Flor/da ~ Estate Salesperson (inactive for several years). EDUCATION: U~wr~ity of Chicago, Lab ~i G~u~ ~ ~949 ~ARY: Umh~ ~~y~ ~ ~ 1~ r 03/88/2~2 17:47 lg4151409~] ALDO ROSA PAGE 05/0~2002 17:47 1841514898L ALDO ROSA P46E 84 Aldo A. Rosa 98~ 5 CLEA~LAI<F- CI~CL~- N~p~es, FL 34109 ZELEPHONE: (941) 514~650 FACSIMILE: [941) 51~61 klco Commodities Inc. was established as o recognized business entity and consultant in emerging intemotionol futures ma~ets. My expe~ise as an international F~ures Commission M~anf and floor broker enabted our client base to g~W. Bu~ness ~?7~-pmsent NCO co~ODfflES INC. N~W YORK. N~ YO~K F~sidenf ond founder of AIco commodities thC., o du~ registered Ameficon Futures Commission ~erchQnf in December ]979-~991 Presiden~ Qnd Founder of ALCO co~oDm~, ZURICH, 1~8]-1~1 p~s]dent ~nd Founder of ALCO co~ODITIES, [UGANO. OD~t~S INC. N~ YORK, N~ YOgi e~ e fi~ locQted ~n 1973- present ~OSA CO~ Commodities, thc. floor b?K _g · house siden~ Emeritus a~d founder R~sa NY ~flmafi~ sewtctng commission ~ ......... ~ ~, New Yo~, American b~Eerage 1965-present ALOO ~ ROSA & COMPANY, N~ YORK, NEW YORK ~esldent of floor Dro~erQge pfim~ly Se~icing commission house se~tce b~ke~ tim(s) su~meded by ROSA CoM~D~IES in 1973 19~ ~gan fading on ~gula~d g~ited Stm~ mmmodJ~ exchanges. ~e ~ch~ge New Yo~ Bo~d of t~de inc. New Yo~ futu~s Ex.once, Inc. New Yo~ Me~anflle ~change. Inc. Exchange see Since 1963, served on vc~c:)us Exchonge seff-~guh=foq/comm~S (p~e o~chmenf ~ ~IoGY). Morttol Sfc3tue-morded with children Dote of girth-November 2-/,. !943 ALDO ROSA PAGE 05 Aldo A. Rosa 9815 Cleax Lake N~l~lcs, Ft~tida 34109 941-514-$650 Futures Exchange Committee(s) New York Cof[ee, Sug~, & Cocoa E,xehangc, Inc. 196'7-1971 1967-1977 1977-1981 1975-1979 1975-t981 1981-1985 1989-I995 1991-1995 1991-1997 New Yoflr Futures Exchange, lac_ 19[}1-1993 boa~ of Mamgers 1983-1989 Admi~imm C_nmmi~ 1983-1985 Eln.qine~ ~t Cmmni~e New yn,~r ~'~. ~ Inc. Watm-L. Balla~ K.m6n O. ~ GOO_ r~ .~, t2OLF. Mdtl~ JOE1NSON, P~ Sally Barker 141 West Street Naples Florida 34108 941 597-1445 Fax 941 597-1519 EITI,~J: Sarahbarker~_a'.sprmtmail com February24,2002 Mrs. Sue Filson Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Dear Mrs. Filson: I would like to express mv interest in being appointed to the Collier County Planning Commission to fill the remaining term in the District 2 seat recently vacated by JA Rautio. Enclosed please find a brief resume omlining my past and current activities for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. If you or the Commission require any further information, please do not hesitate to call Sine. re'ely yours, ~" Sally Barker 141 West Street Naples, FL 34108 Tel: 941/597-1445 Fax: 941/597-1519 Email:Sarahbarker~sprintmait.com Professional: Civic: Medical Publishing Enterprises Naples Senior editor and writer for publications targeted to physicians, nurses, and other health care professionals: 1982 to 1998 United Press International Chicago News writer and desk editor for UPI's National Broadcast Division headquartered in Chicago: 1976 to 1978 CBS - WBBM Radio Chicago Joined as a news writer/editor when this CBS owned and operated radio station went all-news in 1968:1968 to t973 Metromffitan Planning OrRanization Citizens Advisory, Committee (Chair) Appointed to the CAC in Jtme 1994 for a three yem' term as the repre~mative for DistricI Two; served on the MPO's Traffic Calming Task F~ce in 1996. Reappointed to a second term in 1997. ~ ~hair oflhe CAC in Mamh 1998. Re-el~eted May 2001. ProperW Owners of North Collier County/Second District Association (Chair) Elected to Board ofD/ret~trrs, ! 9¢4; chaired the Ntrrth Naples Master Plan Task Force 1996-1997. Appointed interim chairman of the m'gaffi~fion in Oelober 1997, and el~cled eflairmma for atwo y~ term in Jammry 1998. ~ lammry 2000 and 2002. LeaTninR Connection ofNaples~ lnc. Ekx:ted to the Board of Directors of'thi~ ~ot-gor-profit educational assistax~ o~n in Mamh 1997. Ele~ Sally Barker Resume Page two Personal: Select Committee on CommuniW Character and Design and Community, Character/Smart Growth Advisor~ Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. Elected vice- chair by both committees. Greater Naples Civic Association Elected to Board of Directors 1999. .FoCus Served as co-chair and then chair of the Transportation Task Force f~om 1996 to1998, and chaired the Mass Transit Subcommittee EAR Growth Management Committee Appointed by the Collier County Commission in April 1995 to the Citizens Advisory Committee for the Evaluation and Appraisal of the County's Comprehensive Plan. Pine Ridge Civic Association Board of Directors Secreta_*y of the Board of Dkectors for 1991 and 1992; presidem of the PRCA in 1993. Served onthe Board of Directors through 1996. Education: Universky of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. Graduated 1966 with BS from the College of Journalism and Communications. Bom: Chicago, I1. Maiden name: Sarah L. (Sally) McMurry. Married: Michael Barker; two children: Mellanie and William. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FY01/02 ADVERTISING/MARKETING PLAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $552,500.00, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OBJECTIVE: Approval of the FY01/02 Advertising/Marketing Plan submitted by the Marketing Committee of the Tourism Alliance of Collier County, as recommended by the Tourist Development Council. CONSIDERATIONS: On February 26, 2002, the Tourism Alliance of Collier County submitted the advertising/marketing plan and budget recommendations for FY01/02 to staff in the amount of $602,500.00. On April 5, 2002, Chairman Coletta called a Special Meeting of the Tourist Development Council to consider the FY01/02 Plan. Staff recommended one change to the Plan; deletion of the Opportunity Marketing line item for $100,000. Staff recommended that this $100,000 remain in the operating budget to be utilized for "opportunity marketing" and discretionary funding under control of the Director, CDES Operations. The Tourist Development Council agreed instead to reduce the Opportunity Marketing line item from $100,000 to $50,000, leaving $50,000 in the budget under the Director's control for "opportunity marketing" and contingencies. Staff supports the Tourist Development Council's recommendation for Board approval of FY01/02 Advertising/Marketing Plan in an amount not to exceed $552,500.00. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. Fund 194 (Advertising/Promotion) FY01/02 budget remains at $1,496,400 per Board approval in September 2001. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact regarding this action. RECOMMENDATION: Board approve FY01/02 Advertising/Marketing Plan and authorize staff to draft amendment of 2002 Tourism Agreement with Kelly Swofford Roy, Inc. to include the fy01/02 Advertising/Marketing Plan, not to exceed $552,500.00, as recommended by the To~j~st Development Council. SUBMITTED BY://~//~~/~ Date: ~.'~. ~'l~u"~mX~v"-~llace, Director, CDES Operations APPROVED BY: r, Community Develop,[nent and Cnvironmental Services Division . /~ ¢ ~) cL~ss~cFlorida February 25, 2002 TO: Bleu Wallace ~11;o~ t~' .... ?%, FR: Kathy Prut~ RE: Tourism Alliance budeet recommendations Attached is a copy of~e m~etNg budget summ~ for FY01/02 that the Bored of~e Tourism Alliance of Collier County submim for approval to promote Collier County based upon an a~ual budget o1'$1,496,400. We have identified fne expenses paid i~r October 0i and November 0i as well ~ the emergency adve~ising ~ l~es 1 and 2. ~e next lNe item is a $602,500 marketing budget sm~ cove~g December 2001 ~e m~keti~g budget sum~o~ is comprised of: - Adveaising (FLA USA Visit Florida Co-operative/consmer; Florida Su~er 2002 newspaper cam~ai~ and Meet~gs & Incentive market budgets aaached) Outdoor adveaising (Marco Isled billbo~d and S~?L Inlemalional Ai~on Pl~ma screen) Website (maNtenance, updates, pro~Ng, e~cements) Collateral (new fulfil~ent brochure) Oppoauni~ marketina (media, a~are, re~maals, resist.rations, collateral ad research & analysis, ~d booth) The next INe item is the public relations reta~er paid to KSR. Con~act in place. No action needed. The public relations expenses budget summa~ is attached. ~fis item nee~ BCC approval and a contract with ~e agency, it is comphsed of: - ReproducNg the photo CD, slides ~d press Uts Duplication b-roll video Press clipphig J'~i)Oiis a~d mmdio~'h~g sc~ices Wke se~ice press release distributions Special evenm (~,o key meetNg planner evenm in June 2002 ~d Au~st 2002) ~p -e>:t t~ee action needed. The L~S magaz~e ad con~act needs approval. See a~ched. Fulfil~ent envelopes were handled dkectly by yo~ office. No a~ ~eded. Plebe review and advise if you have ~y questions reg~d~g ~e ~dg~ summ~ and pr~eed to submit the summa' to the Tourist Development Couacil and the Board of Collier Coun~ Commissioners.... Tourism AtJiance of Collier County 5395 Park C~tral C~d Naples, FL 34109 ] (941) 597-8~1 F (941) 597-4595 E k.prutos~dassidlorida.com W ~.classicfl~rida.com A cooperative etiorl funded by the Collier County Tourist Development -fax CL.,,ss~cFlorida Collier County iviarketing Budget Surmnary Oct. 0I & Nov. 02 open purchase order ......................................... $173,360.00 ~O-'O Emergency Advertising ................................................................. $250,000.00'' 'f''~'l/'~'~'", Advertising (Dec. 0t - Sept. 02) ....................................... $6 00 00 Public relations retainer (Dec. 01 - Sept. 02) ................................... $90,000.00 Public relations expenses (Dec. O1 - Sept. 02) ................................. $80,000.00 Administration (Dec. 01 - Sept. 02) ............................................... $120,000.00 ~,,mll .... , ~r~o,- 01 -- Sept_ 02) ....................................................... $75_000_00 bli'~r-,.~ rnagazlne aavcrtlSmg program ............................................ a,~z,uuu.uu $?,500 00 Fulfillment envelopes ............................................................................ Sub-total ....................................................................................... $1,470,360.00 TOTAL BUDGET AVAILABLE = ~ ....... ¢.* - ~ okiuoe~ ......................................................................... O~t~U~t/.t/U U i-IC[.}Illl111 tt~tl Tourism Alliance oi Colber County 5395 Park Central Coud Naples. FL 34109 T (941) 597-8001 F (941) 597-4595 E k.prutos@dassi¢iorida com W www.classict tonda.com A cooperative ¢lorl funded by the gotlier~m'~'~'-~opment Tax 0 o o ~g ~E 0 0 o o o o N ~ ~ <<, o o ~PR - 9 2B~2 : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STAFF REPORT ON PLAN TO IMPROVE RELIABILITY OF COUNTY WATER SUPPLY AND PRODUCTION OBJECTIVE: That the Board of Count>' Commissioners. as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, receive a staff report on plans to improve the reliability of County water supply and production facilities. CONSIDERATION: At a special meeting on March 30, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners declared a state of emergency and implemented mandatory restrictions on using County potable water for non-essential uses. This action was deemed necessary after mechanical failure of system sub-components resulted in a partial reduction in the County's ability to produce potable water. A copy of the Executive Summary from that meeting is attached. In the aftermath of the mechanical failures, staff revisited our on-going program to address reliability issues of the County's water supply and production facilities. Staff developed a reliability improvement plan. The plan is divided into two phases: Improvements Preparatory to Peak Season 2003. and Future Improvements. A copy of the Reliability Improvement Plan is attached. Costs for new initiatives are being developed and will be brought back to the Board for funding considerations as appropriate. FISCAL IMPACT: Some of the improvements to be made in FY2002 are works-in- progress and are specifically budgeted. Other improvements to be made in FY2002 are not specifically budgeted. Funds will be requested in the FY2003 budget for improvements to be made after October 1,2002. The source of funds for work related to renewal. replacement, and reliability is User Fees, Fund 412. The source of funds for capacity-related improvements will be funded from Water Impact Fees, Fund 411. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth impact related to this report. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of Cotmty Commissioners, as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier Count>, Water-Sewer District, accept the staff report. Karl W. Boyer, ties Engineering Principal Project Manager Roy ~. Anderson, P.E., Utilities Engineehng Director Pau~Mmausch, Wate~ire~tor & ' J ~ APPRO~D BY:~~ Date: ~/~ ~m Wides, ~mhm Public Utilities Ad~nis~amr -- ~ AGENDA ~T~;, ~ - S 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY,. DECLARE A STATE OF EMERGENCY AND APPROVE MANDATORY IRRIGATION AND OTHER NON-ESSENTIAL WATER USE RESTRICTIONS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONAL ISSUES AT POTABLE WATER PRODUCTION FACILITIES IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners and as ExOfficio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, declare a state of emergency pursuant to Collier County Ordinances No. 84-37 and No. 74-50 and approve and authorize the implementation of mandatory restrictions on the use of potable water for irrigation and other non-essential uses within unincorporated Collier County. No potable water usage will be allowed for irrigation purposes during this time period. The duration of the restrictions will run through Friday, April 5, 2002. Staff expects that this time period will be critical as the impacts of mechanical repairs will be in place and the high season population will start to diminish. This action is necessary as the result of the mechanical difficulties being experienced at the North Regional Water Treatment Facility and some wells in the county wellfields. CONSIDERATION: The North Regional Water Treaunent Facility was placed in service in 1993 and expanded in 1999. It has current capacity to produce 12.0 mgd of membrane softened potable water and 8.0 mgd of reverse osmosis processed potable water. In addition, the South Regional Water Treaunent Facility has the capacity to lgOduce 12.0 xngd of lime softer, ed potable water. The ~,~]ivle~ axe fed by 27 wells in the Lower Tamiami Acquifer with a capacity to produce 27.0 mgd of raw water. Currently, several wells are operating at less than capacity and Ihe resull~g raw water production is appro~ly P~4.0 mgd. The Lower Haw~orne has 10 wells with a designed raw water capacity of 13.0 mgd. This water source provides brackish raw water m the reverse osmosis production facilities. As a result of poor water quality and other operational difficulties, four of the wells are not in service. Two of the remmning six wells axe operating at less than capacity. On February 26, 20(Z2, ~ Board of County Commissioners approveA an emergency I)esignfBaild Conu'act m replace the four wells; however~ ~ expected completion of these wells is December, 20O2. ~~l st~ps. Toward the cad of 2001, four degp wmrr wells in the Hawthm'ne Ac, xtui~ (bnw, kish water sapply) smrlexl m produce water with elevated salt levels; these wells are no longer in ~?rvice. Using these wells would mean that the xeverse osmosis plant could not process water as efficiently, thus lowezmg supply. These wells will be replac~ by the emergency Dezig;nlBuild contract ~ow, d above. Two additional brackish water wells have been tak~ oat of service for ~ and will be brought back on _ APR - 9 2002 line this weekend, pending satisfactory bacteriological results. The two wells combined will add approximately 1.0 mgd of treated potable water. The wells in the Lower Tarmami Acquifer have operated much better, however, two wells have experienced operating problems. Well #2 has been rehabilitated and a new pump and motor installed; bacteriological testing is ongoing. The well was placed in service on Friday afternoon. Well #3 had a failed casing and was re-drilled for a new casing. A new casing, pump and motor have been installed and after expected successful bacteriological testing, will be ready for service early the week of April 1. It is noted that increased production from these wells is dependent on additional processing capability, as described in the next paragraph. Subsequent to the well issues, this past week a motor burned out on Skid B on the membrane softening (fresh raw water processing) side of the plant. The motor was sent out this week for repair and is expected back for installation on Saturday, March 30. It is expected that this motor will be installed around 1:30 P.M. and be ready for service. It will add approximately 1.3 mgd of capacity to the system. On Thursday of this week, Skid A on the membrane softening (fresh raw water processing) side of the plant, experienced filter clogging in the unit. After conversations with the manufacturer, the operations staff is cleaning and shifting the processing order of the filters in the skid. This will allow the skid to be placed back in service, operating at 70% of capacity or about 1.3 mgd of production. In the meantime, an emergency purchase order has been approved in the mount of $46,000 for the delivery of 108 new filters. The manufacturer has agreed to a ten day delivery. In essence, through 29 days, March water demand has averaged 26.5 mgd, with a maximum day of 28.8 mgd and a minimum of 21.9 mgcl On non-irrigation days, demand has averaged 24.8 mgd and on irrigation days a~ average of 27.9 mgd. As of Saturday morning, March 30, production capacity is 24.6 mgd. This represents a 0.2 mgd shortfall to the average non-irrigation day and a 3.3 mgd shortfall to the average irrigation day. Additions to capacity over the next week will add approximately 2.3 mgd to production, bringing capacity to 26.9 mgd. This catmcity addition will only provide marginal improvement to the short term water supply. In addition, a year round mandatory water restriction ordinance will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval on April 9. Finally, along with the 8.0 mgd South Regional Water Plant expansion undo' eonsmaction, 15 wells are scheduled for completion in early 2003. Staff ia also purauing other mid term options to solidify the potable water supply. FISCAL IMPACT: The preservation of the be, st interests of the health and safety of the community far outweighs the short term rextumion in water revenue. APR -: 20?2 GROWTH MANAGEMENT I~[PACT; There is no growth management impact in approving this action. RECOMMlgNDATION:. That the Board of County Commissioners, and as Ex-Officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District: a)declare and proclaim a state of emergency, approve a resolution authorizing the implementation of mandatory resmctions, as recommended by staff, concerning the use of potable water for irrigation and other non-essential uses. The mandatory resmctions will remain in effect through Friday, April 5, 2002; b)declare that during this emergency it shall be unlawful and an offense against the County for any person to use the fresh water supply by the County for any purpose other than cooking, drinking or bathing. SUBMITTED BY: ..._~,~._.--~ .//(~.,,~ .... Date: _ APR - 2222 Reliability Improvement Plan Collier County Water Supply and Production April 3, 2002 Interim Improvements Preparatory to Peak Water Demand Season 2003 On-~,oine Activities 1. Complete four (4) replacement Lower Hawthorn brackish water supply wells 2. Lower Tamiami Wellfield Reliability Improvements: a. Consider amending County Land Development Code to eliminate regulations requiring 'conditional use' zoning for public water supply wells b. Complete five (5) back-up Lower Tamiami fresh water supply wells 3. Complete South County Regional Water Treatment Plant (WTP) expansion. 4. Investigate and develop remedial action plan for failed Lower Hawthorne wells at North County Regional WTP. 5. Initiate test wells and easement acquisition for new wellfield for future expansion to South Count> Regional WTP from 20 mgd to 32 mgd (12 mgd existing. 8 mgd currently under construction, and 12 mgd future.) 6. Explore use of surficial aquifer withdrawals as emergency water supply 7. Design 36-inch transmission main to interconnect with future Northeast Regional WTP near Orangetree. 8. Acquire property for Surface Water Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) for storing wet-season water from Golden Gate Canal during the for irrigation use during dry season. New Initiatives 1. Revisit preventative maintenance and spare pans inventory practices: a. Purchase spare motors for critical unit process components. b. Provide environment-controlled storage for spare motors. c. Implement spare motor rotation preventative maintenance program. d. Initiate automated maintenance management system. 2. Develop Predicted Life and Replacement Program for key components 3. Replace deteriorated or obsolete instrumentation, control hardware, and graphical interface software at North County Regional WTP: a. Replace programmable logic controller (PLC) #3 and rebuild cabinet for PLC#3 b. Replace ~aphical interface software with associated repro=m-amming services. AGEND,Zi ITfi. M I --30¢ - APR - 8 2002 Reliability Improvement Plan County Water Supply and Production April 3, 2002 Page 2 4. Initiate design of in-plant modifications to enhance operational flexibility at both the North and South County Regional WTPs: a. Provide piping to feed fresh water to Reverse Osmosis (RO) process. b. Provide means to feed membrane softening concentrate to RO process. c. Provide dual feed water bypass piping to allow flushing of brackish water supply wells. 5. Engineer remedy to problematic equipment and implement corrective action: a. Backflow preventer b. Acid feed pumps c. Ventilation of high-service pump variable frequency drive cabinets d. Safety of chlorine solution piping e. Vacuum regulator on ammonia piping 6. Initiate design and permitting to add four (4) additional ASR wells to the existing Potable Water ASR system located on Manatee Road. 7. Explore converting failing Lower Hawthorne wells to ASR wells. 8. Negotiate offer to purchase additional property for future Southeast Regional WTP at Manatee Road. * .: ;- Long-Term Improvements 1. Improve water supply reliability by providing an adequate number of back-up water supply wells equal to at least 20 percent of raw water supply demands in all County public water supply wellfields. 2. Upgrade documented preventative maintenance mad spare parts inventory practice for water supply and production facilities. 3. Develop system to plan, budget, and accrue funds for renewal and replacement of aging equipment mad systems. 4. Implement in-plant mod/ficafions to enhance operational flexibility at both the North and South County Regional WTPs. 5. Expand Manatee Road ASR system. 6. Design and implement Surface Water ASR as a hon.-potable source to displace demands on County potable water system for ~esidc'ntial mad commercial irrigation use. ?. Prepare prelim/nary design and cost estimate to convert part or all of existing brackish water RO systems to seawater RO systems. 8. Purchase ~tchhonal property for future Southe. ast Rcg/onal WTP at M,anatee Road. 9. /kc. quire site for futura Northeast Rcgimml WTP near Orangetree. 10. Construct 36-inch transmission main to interconnect with future Nm'theast Regional WTP. - 211112 l EXECUTIVE SU31MAR Y TO PRESENT THE CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANIC4I- REPORTING TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE FISCAL }'EAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000. OBJECTIVE: To inform and present to the Board of County Commissioners the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2000. CONSIDERATIONS: The Clerk of the Circuit Court serving in the capacity as Ex-Officio Clerk to the Board of Count3' Corrm~issioners is responsible for coordination of the annual independent audit along with the production of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. In this role, the Clerk participates in the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting program. This award program was established by the GFOA in 1945 to encourage government units to prepare and publish an easily readable and understandable Comprehensive Annual Financial Report covering all transacnons of the government during the fiscal year. The GFOA along with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, believe that govenunents have a special responsibility to provide the public with a fair presentation of their financial affairs. The CAFR's prepared by and for Collier County go beyond the requirements of generally accepted accounting principles, to providing the many users of our financial statements with a wide variety of information used in evaluating the financial condition of this Counb'. Collier County has received this prestigious award for fourteen consecutive years, and it is with great pride that we inform and presem to the Board the award for the fifteenth consecutive year for the CAFR that was prepared for the year ended September 30.2000. GROWTH MANAGEMENT L~IPACT: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECO.lrMt~IENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners accepts the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fl~e period ended September 30, 2000. Prepared By: a~/a~~~- Reviewed By:_ D,a4gh! E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Date: EXECUTII 'E SUMMAR }' TO FORMALLY PRESENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY C03£~,IISSIONERS THE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001. OBJECTIVE: To formally present to Board of Count3' ConmUssioners the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended September 30, 2001. CONSIDERATIONS: Due to tirmng issues, the Board accepted the Comprehensive Ammal Financial Report for the period ended September 30. 2001 at the Board meeting of March 26, 2002. As a part of that agenda item, the Clerk's Office along with the audit fn-m of KPMG LLP, scheduled to formally present tile CAFR and to give the Board an overx, iew of the fmancial position of the County at the meeting of April 9. 2002 meeting. The Clerk of the Circuit Court serving in the capacity as Ex-Officio Clerk to the Board of Count3' Commissioners is responsible for the coordination of the annual independent audit along with the production of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. In this role, the Clerk is pleased to present to the Board the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. The CAFR represents a significant investment of eftbrt by the Finance and Accounting Department along with numerous County, employees. We would like to express our appreciation to this Board. the other Constitutional Officers, the County Manager. Division Administrators, and the Department Directors not only for their assistance with the CAFR. but for their assistance throughout the year in matters pertaining to the financial affairs of Collier Count)'. GROWTH MANAGEMENT L~,IPACT: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board has previously approved the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the period ended September 30, 2001. this item is inforrnational only and no action is necessary. '-7 Prepared By: ~ General Accounting Manager Dale: AGENDA ITEM,_. APR - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CODE ENFORCEMENT LIEN RESOLUTION APPROVALS OBJECTIVE: For the Board of Count)' Commissioners to adopt separate Resolutions assessing separate liens against certain parcels identified in the Resolutions in order to recover public funds expended to affect the abatement of public nuisances at such locations, all as provided for in Ordinance No. 99-51. as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, the Collier County Litter, Weed and Exotics Control Ordinance. CONSIDERATIONS: Ordinance No. 99-51. as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, mandates the Board to impose a lien against property when an invoice to recover public funds expended to affect the abatement of a public nuisance is not paid at the expiration of twenty (20) days of the date of the notice. The following property owner's have not remitted the invoiced amounts. Case No. Owner of Record Case Summary Lien Amount a. Violation determined 10/31/01 b. Notice of Violation served undeliverable c. Notice .of Violation Posted 11/27/01 $255.00 2001110005 Baron, Mimon d. Unabated nuisance verified 12/10/01 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 01/08/02 f. Owner invoiced for costs 01/10/02 a. VioLation detca mined 09/27/01 b. Notice of Violation served 10/05/01 c. Notice of Violation Posted n/a $445.00 2001090912 Dominguez. Julio d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/09/01 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 12/10/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 12/18/01 a. Violation determined 10/08/01 b. Notice of Violation served 10/13/01 Samuel R. Guinta. Jr.. Joyce c. Notice of'Violation Posted n/a $255.00 2001100351 M. Pitten. Sandra K. Nelson, d. Unabated nuisance verified 10/29/01 Guinta, Dennis C.. Cheryl L., e. Nuisance abated with public funds 12/19/01 Terrence B., & Christopher A. f. Owner invmced for costs 12/21/01 a. Violation determined 10/25/01 b. Notice of Violation served 10/31/01 c. Notice of Violation Posted n/a $255.00 2001101047 Castano, H. Javier & Sherry d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/15/01 L. e. Nuisance abated with public funds 11/20/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 11/29/01 a. Violation determined 10/25/01 b. Notice of Violation served 10/31/01 c. Notice of Violation Posted n/a $255.00 2001101049 Castano, H. Javier & Sherry d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/15/01 L. e. Nuisance abated with public funds 11/20/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 11/29/01 a. Violation determined 10/25/01 b. Notice of Viol ation served 10/31/01 c. Notice of Violation Posted n/a $955 00 2001101050 Castano, H. Javier & Sherry d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/15/01 L. e. Nuisance abated with public funds 11/20/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 11/29/01 a. Violation determined 10/25/01 b. Notice of Violation served 10/31/01 c. Notice of Violation Posted rga $255.00 2001101051 Castano, H. Javier & Sherry d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/15/01 L. e. Nuisance abated with public funds 11/20/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 11/29/01 a. Violation determined 10/25/01 b. Notice of Violation served 10/31/01 c. Notice of Violation Posted n/a $25 5.00 2001101052 Castano. H. Javier & Sherry d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/15/01 L. e. Nuisance abated with public funds 11/20/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 11/29/01 Joyce, Wallace L., Lawrence a. Violation determined 11/05/01 H., Hubbard~ Joan J.. Larson, b. Notice of Violation served n/a 2001110240 Barbara J., Haroskewicz. c. Notice of Violation Posted 11/07/01 $255.00 Patricia J., Corso, Judith J. d. Unabated nuisance verified 12/17/01 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 12/28/01 & Joyce, Lauren f. Ovrner invoiced for costs 01/09/02 Joyce. Wallace L., Lawrence a. Violation determined 11/05/01 H., Hubbard, Joan J., Larson. b. Notice of Violation served n/a 2001110242 Barbara J., Haroskewicz, c. Notice of Violation Posted 11/07/01 $255.00 Patricia J.. Corso, Judith J. d. Unabated nuisance verified 12/17/01 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 12/28/01 & Joyce, Lauren f. Owner invoiced for costs 01/09/02 a. Violation determined 09/07/01 b. Notice of Violation served n/a c. Notice of Violation Posted 09/07/01 $255.00 2001090159 Palm River Estates, Inc., d. Unabated nuisance verified 09/19/01 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 11/01/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 11/03/01 a. Violation delmmined 10/17/01 b. Notice of Violation served 10/31/01 c. Notice of Violation Posted 11/19/01 $4-45.00 2001100856 JMK Industries d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/29/01 e. Nuisance abated wilh public funds 12/10/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 1 ~'~'5~.¢~r'~ 2001110295 l a. Violation determined 11/07/01 b. Notice of Violation served n/a c. Notice of Violation Posted 11/07/01 Watson, Larry J. d. Unabated nuisance verified 11/19/01 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 11/29/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 12;07/01 Upon the Board's adoption of the Resolutions, copies of such and the Legal Notices of Assessment will be mailed to the respective property owners. If the property owners fail to pay the amounts specified in the respective Resolutions within txventy (20) days hereof, the Clerk to the Board will record the Resolutions in the official records of the County. FISCAL IMPACT.[ A total reimbursement of $3,695.00 may be anticipated by voluntary action or foreclosure. The only expense projected to be incurred by the Count)' is the cost of recording the Liens. which is estimated to be approximately $12.50 per lien, totaling $162.50, which is budgeted and available in the current fiscal year Code Enforcement budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This request will have no impact on the County's Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Count>' Commissioners adopt the attached Resolutions. pREPARED BY: , . DATE: Iliana Martinez. Customer Serx ice Specialist Code Enforcement REVIEWED BY: Code Enforcement DATE: SUBM ,I?TED BY: l~ichelle~Edwards Arnold, D~rector Code En£orccmcnt DATE: 2-,,.2 ~ - o& $255.00 APp/Ri~\rED BY: 5-'., .- ~ J~setI/n K. SchmitI. Pdtmini(tra,o'. /y~(munily Development & Environmental Services DATE: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGtt ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMEN1' COLLIER COUNTY. FLORII)A LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN BARON, MIMON DATE: 2375 TAMIAMI TR N STE 300 NAPLES, FL 34103 REF. INV.# 2079 FOLIO # 55200240000 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6, Leh Country Club, MUIRFIELD. according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, i~age 75, of the Public Records of Collier Count). Florida. You. as the ox~ner(s) of the propert) aboxe-described, as recorded in the record~ maintained bx file office of thc Propcn.x Appraiser, arc hereb.~ adxised that Ibc Code Enforcement Director. did determine a public nmsance existed on lot 6. and consututed a xiolation ot county regulations on December 10, 20(}1. and ordered lhc abatement oi a ccrta;n nmsance existing on thc aboxe propert.', prohibited bx Ordinance Nt~. 99-51. a~ amended and serxed a noucc of xiolation upor, you. Thc nuisance V~EEDS: ACCUMULATION OF V,,EEI)S. GP, ASS. OR OTHER NON-PROIECTED OVERGRO~.YIH IN EXCESS OF EIGHTEEN ~18~ INCHES. You haxe failed lO timely aba',c such nuisance: xxhercupon, it was abated bx thc expenditure of public funds a! adnec! cost of FIFTY-FIVE {$55.00~ DOLLARS and an adminislrative cost of lv,'o-hundred ($200.00} dol}ars lor a lolal of TB'O-HIJNDRED FIFI'Y-EI'Vt5 {$2,'5fi.001 DOLLA RS. Such cost. bx Reso]ulion of lhe Board of Count.', Commissioners of Collier Counl>. Florida, shall become a lien on }our prope~q.> ,A hen recorded after appro', al bx lhe Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAl' IH[ AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MtY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F LIENS.' MSTR L\ ~k 1 2 6 7 8 9 I0 11 12 13 1.-1 15 1© 17 1o 20 21 24 25 27' 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 37 38 39 40 41 42 45 45 46 47 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLLFTION OF THE BOARD OF COL.~TY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESS.MIENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE \V1TH ORDINANCE No. 99-51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS. as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrati`.e cosl incurred by the County. shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the Count,,' as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of Count)Commissioners. togelher with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, vatid and binding obligation upon the property' against which made until paid: and \VHERE:X.S. thc assessment shall become due and pa)'able no later than twent', (201 da`.s of the date of the Legal Not/cc of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of t`.x elve percent (12~ ) per annum. NO\\'. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTT COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that Ions)6 of the property described as follows, ha\ mg been abaled ora public nu;sance after due and proper nonce thereof to the ov, nerl:.) oI said propcrt), lb bercbx assessed the folJov, in.~ costs of such abatemenl, to xxit: NAME: BARON. MIMON LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6. Leh' Country Club. MUIRFIEL1). according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, Page 75~ of the Public Records of Collier Count)'. Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: 2079 FOLIO #: 5520024000{~ The Clerk shall th) regular U.S. mail) mail a cop) of this Resolulion along ,.~ith thc Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owneris) of lhe aboxc-described propert). If x,.ithin txvenl,, (2()~ days of the date ol mailing that cop). the ox~ner fails to deli`.er pa)mere in full to Collier Count,,. Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County. and by recording shall constitute a lien agmnst the abo',e-described real property, and to 1he extcnl alloy, ed by tax~. shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned bx the noted property ov,'ner(s) in Collier Count,,'. This Resolulion passed and duly adopted by the Board of Count.',' Commissioners of Collier Count.',' Florida. this __ da,,' of 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COl J .IF_R COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant County Anorney ' James N. Coletta, Chairman F LIEN' MSTR RESOLt'TION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNIY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN DOMINGUEZ, JUL10 DATE: 74 ASHLEY ST BRIDGEPORT, CT 66101617 REF. INV.# 2065 FOLIO #: 36247840001~ LIEN NLWIBER: LEGAL DESCRIPIION: Lot 8. Block 175. ['nit 5 Part - GOLDEN GATE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5. Page 122 of the Public Records of Collier Count>'. Florida. You. as tile o~nei'~s, o! ~r~c p:open~ above-described, as recorded in the records maintained b~ the ofhce ol the Prop::-:5 :~i',}'~:~,c~. are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did delermine a pubh, nu:>a~,,~ cx}>tcd on ]t,t S. and constituted a violalion of countx regulalions on November 09. 2001, :::'~: , :~:~:,d ~hc aba~cment ora certain nmsance ex~sting on linc abo~c propen3 prols~b~cd bx ()~d:~;:.: . ~ ' ' < 1. a, amended and scrxcd a notice OI violation upon xou. Thc nul~al]cc EXOTICS: ACCUMULAI'ION (}I ['R~}IIIBITEI) SPECIES ON UNIMPROYED LAND LOCATED ~VI'I'ttlN 200' OF 1MPR( }x 1_1 h S['BI)iVII)ED PROPER]'I. You haxe failed ',,, t~:. :: '~ >uch nmsancc: ~hcreupon. 11 was abaled bx expendilure of public iunds al a ¢::~ : . oI TXl-O ~t~DRED FORTY-FIVE ($~5.00} ~LLARS and an admims~rz~u',c ,~'-' ,~ '1 x~,,-hundred (~00.001 dollars for a total of FOUR- HUND~D FORTY-FIVE 1~5.~ I)OLLARS Such cosL bx Resolunon ~,~ thc Board of Count> Commissioners of Collier Countx, FIo~da. shall become a lien on your phT~ :x, v. hcn recorded after approxal bx lhe Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY TIlE AM{)t'NT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINSI ALL OF YOIR PROPERTY !~ COLLIER COUNTY. F LIENS' MSTR LNAL 1 2 4 5 6 7 $ 9 10 II 12 13 14 16 17 19 2.4 25 27 .'7'9 30 31 3; 33 34. 3'7 39 40 41 42 .43 44 45 .40 4'7 49 5O 51 5_.2 56 5'7 58 59 6O RESOLUTION NO.,_0(}_- '~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COL.~TY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47. AS A,MENT)ED WHEREAS. as provided in Ordinance No. 9%51. as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the Count,,'. shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the Countx as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of Count.',' Commissioners, together v. ith a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, va}id and binding obligation upon thc property against ,a hich made unlil paid: and WHEREAS, the assessmenl shall become due and payable no later than t:~entx i2~!~ daxs of tile date of the Legal Notice of .~sse$sment and interest shall accrue on tile unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12q) per annum. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF CO[.~TY COMM1SS1ONT. RS OF COLLIER COL.~TY. FLORIDA. that lot(si 8 of the propcn.x described as /'oHo:: s. haxing been abated of a public nuisance alter duc and proper nonce thereot to thc of said propen.x, is hereby assessed the t'ollox~ ins costs ol such abatement. Io x~ it: NAME: DOMINGUEZ. JULIO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8. Block 175, Unit 5 Part - GOLDEN GATE. according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 122 of the Public Records of Collier County. Florida. COST: $345.00 REFERENCE#: 2065 FOLIO #: 3624784000{} The Clerk shall tbx regular U.S. mai}l mail a cop.v of this Resolution alt,nS with thc Notice of Assessmenl of Lien to the ox~ner(sl ol lhe abo~c-dcscnbcd properts. If ~ithin t:xentx ~20~ daxs of tile date ol mailing lhat cop}', lhe ox~ner fails to deli:er payment m full lo Collier Coumx, thc Resolution and Notice of ,Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Coumx. and bx recording shall constilule a lien againsl the aboxe-descnbed real propert5. and lo the extcn~ allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal propert5 ox~ned b', the noted property ov, ner(s } in Collier Count,,. This Resolution passed and dui5' adopted by the Board of Countx Commissioners of Collier Coumy, Honda, this __ da,,' of .2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COLLNTY COMMISSION'ERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorne5 James N. Coletta, Chairman F LIEN/MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD ()F COL~TY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY. H.ORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN GUINTA JR ET AL, SAMUEL R DATE: % GUINTA INVESTMENTS 4155 SACRAMENTO BLVD MEDINA. OH 44256 REF. INV.# 2070 FOLIO #: 75460400000 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 12. Block 2, S[.~NY TRAIL HEIGItTS SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the office of thc Clerk of Circuit Court of Collier Counly. Florida. in Plat Book 4. Page 43. You, as thc ox~neI(sl o! tile propcrt5 aboxe-descnbed, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Propc~% Appraiser. are hereby adxised that the Code Enforcemen~ Director. did determine a public nmsancc exi,,lcd on lot 12. and consmutcd a violation of coun~x regulations on Oclober 29. 2001. and ordered thc aburement ufa cerium nuisance existing on Ibc aboxe propen.x prohibited bx Ordinuncc No. 9q-51, as amended and served a noHce of xiolalion t]pon you. Thc nuisance is: V~'EEDS: ACCUMULATION OF V~'EEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGRO~,VTtl IN EXCESS OF EIGHTEEN ~18~ INCITES IN ttEIGHI'. You haxe failed lO timely abate such nmsance: xxhereupon, it was abated bx the expenditure of public funds at a direc~ cost of FIFIY-FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an adm~mstrative cost of Tx~o-hundrcd ($200.00) dollars lor a total of IT[O- HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE {$2.55.00} DOLLARS Such cost. by Resolulion of the Board of Count) Commissioners of Collier Counlx. Florida, shall become a lien on 3'our property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE 5Li't' RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COL.~TY. APR 0 9 2002 ~F: LIENS/MS'I'R LNAL $ 9 10 11 12 13 1.4 15 17 19 2O 21 23 __5 29 30 3.?' 33 3.4 35 3(, 3'7 3~ 39 40 41 `1.13 ,4.4 ,15 4-' 49 50 $2 53 5'7 59 60 61 {22 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF CO[.WTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE \VITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47. AS AMENT)ED WH]E, REAS, as proxided in Ordinance No. 99-51. as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County. shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereoi lo the Count) as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of Count> CommL, sionc~s, together ~ith a description of said parcel: and WH]EREAS. such asses~n'~cnt shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until pal& WHEREAS. the assessmc:7 ~.i~al! t, ccome clue and pa~able no later lhan days of the dale of the Le2al No:~.: ,. X>-~>ment andintere~t shall accrue on the unpaid balance be~inmn~ ~ onlhedatethisResolumni>~.' ,,~.~c~'~a~d~crateoflx~elvepercenl(12%~perannum. NO\V. THEREFORF:. t;i !7 RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF CO[2NTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER ('( ,[ N 1 5 . FLORID.X. that lons~ 12 of follow s, hax~ng been abalcd ol a pu):~. ~.,::.:~:L'c alte~ duc and proper not,ce thereof to Ibc owner{ ofsaidpropen>.~shereb} a~sc>>cdd~:. ,.v.~]~co~t>ol~uchabatement. to NAME: SAMUI£L R. Gl'INT.\..IR...1{ ~'~ CF. M. P1TI'EN. SANDRA K. NELSON. GUINTA. DENNISC..CHERYLL.,TERRE\£1 I;..& CHRISTOPItERA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 12. Blotk 2. S['NN5' TRAIL HEIGHTS SUBDI~,'IS1ON. according lo the map or plat thert, ol m~ lilt. and recorded in the office of the Clerk of Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, in lqal Book 4. Page 43. .COST: $255.00 REFERE N ('IL=: 2070 FOLIO #: 75460400000 The Clerk shall {b.x rcgu!.: ['S mail~ ma)l a copy of this Resolution along v, ith Notice of Assessment of Lien to the ov.m:~,,, ~ thc abe\e-described properl). If v, ithin txtent'~ days of lhe date of mailing that oep.,,, thc o?.ncr lail~ to deli\er paymen! m full 1o Collier Count\. IBc Resolution and Notice of Assessment sh::il be recorded in the official records of Collier Count\. and bx recording shall constitute a lien zv_'~:ir.-: thc abe\e-described real properl), and lc, the extent allots, ed b> lay,. shall al>o be a lien up, T. all el]ncr real and/or personal propert> or, ned b', tile noted properly owner(s'~ in Collier Counl5. This Resolution passed and dui) adopted by lhe Board of Count) Commissioners of Collier Count,,', Florida. this __ day of .2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COl_.rNrrY COMMISSIONERS COLLIE[-: COUNTY. FLORIDA BY: BY: Depmy Clerk Approved as lo form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant Count,,' Atto,me', James N. Colena, Chairman F LIEN,' MSTR RESOLUTION AC~.~ ITFM ,,o.. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN H. JAVIER CASTANO & SHERRY L. DATE: 8235 WILSHIRE LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109 REF. INV.# 2056 FOLIO #: 62570960003 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15, 36, 37 and 38. Block 17, NAPLES PARK, Unit 2. according to the plat Ihereof. as recorded in plat book 2. page 107, public records of Collier County, Florida. less and except the North Ten 110} feet of. ~hen measured at right angles to the N{;rth line of the following lots: Lots No. 36.37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. Unit 2. You. as the owner(si of the property above-described, as recorded in the record~ maintained bx the ofiice of thc Property Appraiser. are hcrebx advised tha~ thc Code Enforcemcm Director. did delermine a public nuisance existed on lot 30. and constituted a violation of countx regulations on November 15. 2001. and ordered thc aba~ement ol ;~ certain nmsance existing on thc above propert.~ prohibited bx Ordinance No. 99-51. a- amended and served a notice of violation upon you. ]-he nuisance WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS. GR.'~SS. OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGRO~,VTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You haxe failed to timelx abate such nuisance: whereupon, it was abated bx thc expendilurc oI public funds at a direct co>~ of FIFTY-FIVE ($55.0~ DOLLARS and an administranxe cost of Tv, o-hundred ($200.00~ dollars lot a total of TIVO--HL.~DRED FIFTS'- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost. by Resolulion of the Board of Coum) Commissioners of Collier Coumy. Florida. shall become a lien on )'our propert5 when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A ! IFN AGAINST ALL OF YOL,~R PROPERLY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS' MSTR L~AL ~..~A field I APR 0 9 2002 7 $ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 I$ 19 21 22 23 24 25 2~ 29 3O 31 32 34 35 30 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 4(' 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COL.~TT CO.'Xl.',llSSIONTRS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47. AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct cosls of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the Count)'. shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to lhe Count.,,' as to each parcel shall be calculated and repo~led to the Board of County Commissioners. together with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against ,~t hich made until paid: and WHEREAS. the assessmenl shah become due and payable no later than tx~ent\ days of tile date of tile Lemd Nt,tice of .Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolulion ~s recorded al the rate of txx elx'e percent ~.12Q ~ per annum. NO\V. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BT THE BOARD Ol: COL'NTT COMM1SSIONTRS OF COLL1ER COUNT'f. FLORH).-\. that lotl s) 36 of the property described follo,.vs, haxing been abalcd of a pubhc ntnsanct: alter duc and proper nol~ce the~eoI to lhe o~nert>~ of said propen.x. ~s herebx assessed the i'o]]oxt lng costs of such abatement, to NAME: H. JA'CIER CASTANO & SHERRY L. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14. 15.36.37 and 38. Block 17, .NAPLES PARK. ['nit 2, according to the pla! thereof, as recorded in plal book 2. page 107. public records of Collier Counl.~. Florida, less and except tht Norlh Ten ~10~ feet of. ~hen measured at right angles to the North line ol the follo~ing lots: Lots No. 36.37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. Unit 2. COST: $255.t}0 REFERENCE#: 2056 FOLIO #: 62570960003 Thc Clerk shall (bx regular U.S. mail,~ mail a cop3 of Ibis Resolution along with tile Notice of AssessmentofLientolheox~ner/s)o~lheaboxe-describcdpropert). I1 xxil}nn t\~cntx i2tl~ daxs of the date of mailing tllat cop)', the o~',ncr fails to dehxer pa)ment in full to Collier C'ountx. thc Rcsolulion and NOliCC of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Count\. and by recording shall conslilule a lien against the aboxe-described real property, and to ibc e\lerd allox~ed bx lax\. shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal propert) ox\ned bx IbC nutcd properly' oa ner(s) in Collier Count\. This Resolulion passed and dui,,' adopted by the Board of Count,,' Commissioners of Collier Count)', Florida, this__ da)' of ,2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COl _I .FER COUNTY, FLORIDA BT: BY' Deput)' Clerk James N. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant Counly Attome)' APR F LIEN MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN H. JAVIER CASTANO & SHERRY L. DATE: 8235 W1LSHIRE LAKES BLVD NAPLES. FL 34109 lIEF. INV.# 2057 FOLIO #: 62570970006 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPIION: Lots 14. 15. 36. 37 and 38, Block 17. NAPLES PARK, Unit 2, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in plat book 2, page 107, public records of Collier County. Florida, less and except the North Ten (101 feet of, when measured at righl angles to the N~rth line of the following lots: l~ot~ No. 36.37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK, Unit 2. You. as the owne~ts~ ol th~ propen} above-described, as recorded in the records maintained b> thc office of the Propc~:~ .-Xpp~a~c:. ;,c bcrcbx advised thal the Code Enforcement Direclor. did determine a public nt;~>~,:, ~ :'t-ted on It)t 37, and constituled a violation ol counlx regulalion5 on November 15. 2t)1)1. ~,' ,5 J, ~cd tine ;i}~:ttOFlqelql OI a certain nmsance existing on thc aboxc properU prohibilcd bx Old;:; .... ', .... q i ;~, amended and serxed a not~ce of xiolation upon xou. Ihe nuisance WEEDS: ACCUMULATION (II Xxli[I}$. GRASS, OR OTHER NON-PROTECIED OVERGROB'IH IN EXCESS (}I' You have failed It, m::~ :' :,r..:c such nuisance: whereupon, il was abaled bx lhc ex~nditure of public funds at a 0:'~ c~,>~ of FIFTY-FIVE ($55.00} DOLLARS and an administranve cos~ of Two-hundred tS200.00~ dollars for a ~ola] of TIY~HUNDRED FIVE (~fi.O0) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolutwr: ,'I ~tnc Board of Counly Commissioners of Collier Count5. Florida, shall become a li~ on your p~,,;,~'~r > x~ hen ;ecorded afle~ approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TEMELY PAl' THE A NI(}UNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F .LIENS' MSTR 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2" 28 29 30 31 52 33 34 35 3O 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 5O 51 52 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLLVYION OF THE BOARD OF COL~TY CON~IISSIONERS PROVDING FOR THE_ ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51. as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as' amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the Count). shall be assessed against such properly; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the Count)' as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together ~aith a description of said parcel: and \VHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon propen), against v, hich made unlil paid: and \VHEREAS. the assessment shall become due and payable no later than tx~entx (2(}~ daxs of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the ra~c of tx~elve percent (125) per annum NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COL~TY. FLORIDA. that lot(s) 37 the property described a., foltov, s. haxing been abated ora public nuisance after due and proper nol~ce thereof to lhe o~xne~ls~ of said propert), is herebx assessed the following costs ot such abatement, to ~t it: NAME: lt. JAVIER CASIANO & SHERRY L. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14. 15, 36, 37 and 38, Block 17, NAPLES PARK, [:nit 2, according Io the pla~ thereof, as recorded in plat book 2, page 107. public records of Collier County, Florida, less and except the North Ten (10l feet of. ;~hen measured at right angles to the Norlh line of the follo,,ving lots: Lots No. 36,37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. Uni! 2. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: 2057 FOLIO #: 62570970006 The Clerk shall (b) regular U.S. mail i mail a cop>; of this Resolution along v. ith the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the ox~ner(s) of Ibc aboxe-descnbed property. 11 within Iv. enl'~ (201 daxs of the date of mailing that copy. the o~vner fails to deli\er payment in full to Collier Count,.. the Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Count,,, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the abo,,e-descnbed real propen), and to the extent alloy, ed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property ov. ned by the noted propen) or, net(s) in Collier Count.,,'. This Resolution passed and duly adopted bv the Board of County Commissioners of Collier Count5', Florida, this __ day of 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as lo form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant Count5' Attomex James N. Co]etta, Chairman F LIEN' MSTR RESOLL~TION APR 0 .q 2002 BOARD OF CO[.~TY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENF ORCEME; T DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY. FLORil)A LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN H. JAV1ER CASTANO & SHERRY L. DATE: 8235 WILSHIRE LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109 lIEF. INV.# 2058 FOLIO #: 62570980009 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14. 15. 36. 37 and 38. Block 17. NAPLES PARK. Unit 2. according to the plat thereof, as recorded in plat book 2. page 107, public records of Collier Count)', Florida, less and except the North Ten (10) feet of. ~¥hen measured at right angles to the North line of the follox~ ins lots: Lots No. 36.37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. Unit 2. You. as the o~nerls~ of line property above-described, as recorded in thc records maintained by the office of the ProperU Appraiser. are tnerebx ad~ ~sed final tile Code Enforcement Director. did determine a public nmsancc existed on lot 38. and consl)tutcd a violation of counlx regulations on No~embcr 15. 2001. and ordered the abalement ol a certain nuisance existing on thc above property prohibiled bx Ordinance No 9[)-51. as amended and scrxed a not,cc of xiolation upon you. Thc nuisance V~'EEDS: ACCI_.~,IUL-~IION OF V~'EEDS. GR*.SS. OR OTItER NON-PROTECIED OVERGROV~'TH IN EXCESS OF 18" You haxc failed to timelx abate such nuisance: xxhereupon, il ~3. as abated by Iht? expendilure of public funds at a d~rect cost of FIFTY-FIVE 1555.001 DOLLARS and an ad~ninistra~l~e cost of Two-hundred 15200.00) dollars for a total of TIVO-H[,,NDRED FIFTI'- FIVE ($255.00~ DOI_,LARS. Such cost. b.; Resolution of the Board of Count> Commissioners of Collier Count5. Florida. shall become a lien on )'our properly u'hen recorded after approval bx the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAl' THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF %'OUR PROPERT. Y 1N COLLIER CO[~'TY. F LIENS/MSTR LN 1 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 10 17 15 19 ~0 2~ 30 3] 35 39 40 41 45 46 45 49 50 $1 53 54 55 56 55 59 60 61 62 63 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COtLNTY COMMISS1ONTRS PROVDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENT)ED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixe cost incurred by the Countx, shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cosl thereof to the Count,,' as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of Count\ Commissioner>. logether with a description of said parcel; and \'~q-IEREAS. such assessmo-;t >hal] be a legal. ',alid and binding obligation upon the properly against :vhich made until paid. ::;.2 WHEREAS. the assessmc~:: 5h;dl become due and payable no later than mentx (20, days of the date of lhe Legal Notice ,.' 'x--z--mcnt and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolulion ~s l~.',, o; ded at the rate o~ tx\ elve percent (12q ) per annum. NOW. THEREFORE. b'E t-I RESOLVED BI' THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER CO'.'NI 5'. FLORIDA. that Iot(s~ 3S the propen.x described follov, s. hax lng been abated oi a p~b]~, ! ~2:-,:;~ c altm duc and ploper notice thereof to thc oxx nen,s~ of saidpropert).~shereb,, assessedtli: :, >. ~;',2Ct,-lbOl suchabatemenl, tox:it: NAME: II. JAVIER CASTANO & 5IlI~RI(~ l,. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14. 15.3t,. 3- aod 3S, Block 17. N-XPLES PARK, [nit 2. according lo the plal thereof, as recorded in plat book 2, page 1o7. i)ublit records o! Collier Count). Florida, less and except the North Ten (l(h feet of. '.~hen measured at right anek- to thc North line of the follo'~ing lois: Lots No. 36.37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. Unit 2. COST: $255.00 REFERENtT~-: 2058 FOLIO #: 625-/0980009 The Clerk shall ~b', regal / .%. mail~ mail a cop> of this Resolution along vxith thc Notice of Assessment of Lien to the o,,,.~cl, st t,l tile aboxc-descnbed property. It ¥.ithin t,aenlx 12~!1 days of the date of mailing that cop>. tl-~.' <,v. F. ev fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County. thc Resolution and Notice of Assessment .-h~/,i bc recorded in the official records of Collier Count,,. and by recording shall conslilute a lien a.3:,'.n-i thc aboxe-described real properts, and Io the eXlCnl allov, ed by la,a, shall also be a lien upo~ al/ other real ancb'or personal properLx o~ncd bx thc holed property ov, ner(s) in Collier Count ~ This Resolution passed ann did', adopted by the Board of Count'. Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. this __ day el .2002. ATFEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COLrNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk James N. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to form and legal suffici~ ¢ Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant Count.',' Attornex F LIEN,' MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF COE"~TY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNT'f, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN H. JAVIER CASTANO & SHERRY L. DATE: 8235 W1LSHIRE LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109 REF. INX'.# 2054 FOLIO #: 62570420006 LIEN NL~,IBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15. 36. 37 and 38, Block 17. NAPLES PARK, Unit 2. according Io the plat thereof, as recorded in plal book 2, page 107, public records of Collier County. Florida. less and excep! the North Ten (10t fee! of, when measured at right angles the N~rth line of the follow, lng lots: Lots No. 36.37 ami 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK, Unit You, as the owner(s) o~ the propc;% aboxe-descnbed, as recorded in the records maintained bx the office o! the Prope~q_x Apprab, e:'. arc hcrcbx advised that the Code Enforcement Director. d~d determine a public nuisance existed o~n ]t,l 15 and constiluted a violation of countx regulalJons on Noxember 15, 2001. and ordered I}tc abatement ol a cenmn nmsance existing on thc above properly prohil:iled by Ordinance Nu t)9-51, you. The nmsancc VVEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF VfEEI)S. (;RASS. OR ()TILER NON-PROTECTED OVERGROXVTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You haxc failed to timely abate such nuisance: whereupon, it ,.,,'as abated b,, lbo expenditure o'f public funds at a direct {.'os: of FIFIY-FIVE ~$55.00) DOLLARS and an admm~stralixc cost of l,,~o-hundred 15200.00,} dollars for a total of TWO-HI_~DRED HFTY- FIVE ($255.00 ~ DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of lhe Board of CounLv Commissioners of Collier Counly, Ftonda, shall become a lien on 5,our property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOL~T SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERT.Y IN CQLLIER ~OUNTY. F LIENS' MSTR LN-M~ 0 9 2002 ! 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 lb 19 20 21 -'2 23 24 25 27 2," 29 32 33 3-; 35 3O 37 35 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 .16 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 5'7 58 59 6O 61 62 63 RESOLUTION NO. "00" A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF L1EN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE \VITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51. as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixe cost incurred by the Count>'. shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS. the cost thereof to the Count)' as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of Count>' Commissioners, together v,'ith a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, xalid and binding obligation upon the propen> against which made until paid: and WHEREAS. the assessment shall become due and pa.,able no later than txx'entx (£(~, daxs of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded al the rate of melve percent (12q5) per annum. NO\V. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLiER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that lot(s)l 5 of the properU described as follow>, ha\lng been abated of a public nmsance afler duc and proper nonce llnercof to the o:;nerl:, i of said propert>, ts hereb', assessed the follo,a mg costs of such abatement, to x~ it: NAME: H. JAVIER CASTANO & SHERRY L. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14.15.36.37 and 38. Block 17. NAPLES PARK. t'nit .. accordm= to the plat thereof, as recorded in pla! book 2. page 107, public records of Collier Count}. Florida. less and exeepl the North "fen {ltd feet of. ,,,,hen measured at right angles to the North line of the Iollo',~ing lots: Lots No. 36.37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. Unit 2. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: FOLIO #: 62570420006 The Clerk shall Ibx regular 1.'.S. maill mail a cop> of lhis Resolution along x~ith Notice o] Assessment of Lien to the ov, nerls) of tine abo\e-descFibed propert). If ,.,.ithin Iv. em,, daxs of the date of mailing that cop>', the ox~ner fails to deli\er pa>ment in full to Collier Count\. Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Count\. anti b'. recording shall constitute a lien against line above-described rcm property, and to thc extenl alloaed b) lax~. shall also be a lien upon all other real an&,'or perscmal propen) ox~ned bx the noted property owner(s) in Collier Count)'. This Resolution passed and dui.,' adopted by the Board of County Commissioners o~ Collier Coumy, Florida, this __ da.,' of 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER S COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BY: BY:. Deputy Clerk James N. Colelta. Chmrman Approved as ~o form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant Count.,' Attorne., F LIEN MSTR RESOLtWION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGit ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENq- COLLIER COUNTY. FLORII)A LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN H. JAVIER CASTANO & SHERRY L. DATE: 8235 P, ILSHIRE LAKES BLVD NAPLES. FL 34109 REF. INV.# 2055 FOLIO #: 62570410003 LIEN N'UMBER: LE(;AL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15, 36.37 and 38, Block 17. NAPLES PARK. Unit 2. accordin~ to the plat thereof, as recorded in plat book 2. page 107, public records of Collier Counlx. [Iorida. less and except the North Ten (10) feet of, when measured at right angles to the N~rth line ol the folio;ring lots: Lots No. 3637 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. Unil 2. Y(,~.~. as the ox~neris) o1 the propcn} abo~e-dc~cribcd, a~ recorded m thc record, nna~n:,~q,d b', ~he oflice of the Propen> Appra~se~. are herebx advised thal Ibc Code Enforccmen: rc~::~' '. ,:~-. No~embcr 15, 2001. and ordered [tqe abatement oI a certain nmsancc ex~qin7 on th: ab,.'. ~' : :'? prohibitedbvOrdmance N~.99-51.asanaendedandserxedanoticcofxio]ati°n up~m V~EI IP': .\('CUMULATION OF V~'EEDS, O\ IlR{ ;I-,'~ )\\ I-H IN EXCESS OF '~[~u have failed lo timely abate such exr~c:;,! '~;:~ of public funds al a direct cosl of GRASS. OR OTItER NON-PROTECTEI) nuisance: t~hereupon, il v, af, abaled b\ thc FIFTY-FIVE ($~5.001 DOLLARS and an admm~,lr,t:', c cost of Two-hundred 15200.00) dollars for a lotal of TWO-H[.~DREI) FIFTS'- FIVE ~S255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of Count.', Commissioner3 of Colher Count\. Florid,:. sta:~ll become a lien on ~xour property when recorded after approval by lhe Board. I:AIIA'RI-' TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOLqNT §PECIFIED IN IHI§ NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A IAl(N AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COLrNTY. F LIE'q'-, MSTR LNAL I 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 24 2:5 25 29 3O 31 33 34 35 30 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 6I 62 63 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COl...WTY COM.",IISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No, 99-51, as successor lo Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixc cost incurred by the County. shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together x~ :th a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against '~. hich made until paid: and WHERE:~S. lhe assessment shall become due and payable no later than tx~entx ~2~:~, days of the date of thc Legal Not:cc of Assessment and interest shall accrue on lhe unpaid balance beginning on the da~e this Resolution is recorded al the rate of tx,, elve percent ~' 12c~ ) per annum. NO\V. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that lot~s~ 14 lhe prope~1> described a> follo~t s. ha\lng been abalcd oI a pubhc nmsancc afler due and proper not,ce lhereof t~ the o~t ner~ s, of said propc~q>. ~s herebx assessed the fo]loxt ing costs ol such abatement, lo xt ~: NAME: !t. JAVIER CASTANO & SHERRY I,. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15, 36.37 and 38, Block 17. N~PLES PARK. Unit 2, accord:hz to the pla~ Ihereof, as recorded in plat book 2, page 11}7, public records of Collier £'ount.x. Florida, less and excepl the North Ten (10} feet of, uhcn measured at right angles to th.[' Norlh line of the folhming lot>: Lot~, No. 36.37 and 38 in Block 17 of NAPLES PARK. ['nit 2. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: 2055 FOLIO #: 62570410003 The Clerk shall tbx regular U.S. maili mail a cop.~ of this Resolution along x\ith thc Notice of Assessment of L~en lo the ox~ner~s.~ of the aboxe-dc~cribed propert> If within men~x (21lj daxs of the date of m:,iting lhat copy. lhe o~ner fails 1o deli\er payment in full to Collier Count\. thc Resolution and Nolicc of Assessment shall be recorded in lbo official records of Collier CotllllX. and by recording shall conslitute a lien against the above-described real propen), and 1o the exleni allotted by lax~. shall alsa be a lien upon al} olher real an&'or personal prope~) o~ned bx the ncqcd property o~'ner~s) m Collier Count\. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of Coumx Commissioners of Collier County, Ftonda, this __ da)' of .2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIFR COUNT5 , FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Auome.x James N. Coletta, Chairman A~A ITF~1 LIEN/MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF CO[.NTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH 1TS CODE ENFORCEMEN [ DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN Joyce, Wallace L., Lawrence H., DATE: Hubbard, Joan J.. Larson, Barbara J., Haroskewicz. Patricia J., Corso. Judith J. & Joyce. Lauren $06 QUINNIPIAC AVE NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 REF. INV.# 2077 FOLIO # 74412240002 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 and 6, Block D, South Tamiami Heights. as recorded and platted in Plat book 3, Page 44. Puhlic Records of Collier Count)', Florida. 'You. as the o:~ner(sl of tine propert) abo~e-descnbed, as recorded in the records maintained bx the off icc of tine Property Appr.'fiser, are herebx adxised lhat tine Code Enforcement Dn'ector. did determine a pubhc nuisance existed on lot O. and constituted a x'iolation ol countx regulations on December 17. 2001. and ordered the abatement oi a cerium nmsance existing on thc aboxc propei~) p~ohibHcd bx Ordinance No. 99-51. as amended and serxed a nolice of violation upon VOL~. Thc nuisance VVEEDS: ACCUMULATI(}N OF %VEEDS. GRASS. OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGR(}WTtt IN EXCESS OF 18- 'fou have Iailed lo timely abate expenditure of public funds at a direct cosl such nuisance: whereupon, it was abated b: the of F1FTYoEIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an admimstratixe co~,t of l~vo-hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TXVO..HUNDRED FII:rY- FIVE ($255.00'~ DOLLARS. Such cost, bx Resolution of the Board of Counly Commissioners of Collier Count). Florida. shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE ht~Y RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY' IN CQLLIER (~0UNTY. F LIENS' MSTR LNAL 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 19 20 21 25 24 25 2( 2" 31 32 34 35 3o 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 45 4(, 4'7, 48 ..19 50 51 52 53 54 55 5O 57 58 59 Ol RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COIc .~TY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TI-[E COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE \VITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47. AS AY[ENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixc cost incurred by the County. shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS. the cost thereol lo IbC Count', as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners. together with a descnpnon of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessm:nr shall bca legal, valid and binding obligation upon the properly against which made until pa~J: WHEREAS. the assessmc~:: >i~A} i~ccome due and payable no later than mcr, tx daxs of the date of the Legal No~cc ~,I \..:o. me~t andinteres~ shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution ~> ~ot&'d al the tale of twelve percent 112r~! per annum. NOXV. THEREFORE. [CE !1 RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COI.LIER ('()! Nix,`. FLORIDA. that lott~l 6 thc properu described fo]lt~xx s. having been abated o] a pub;~ ~ ~::-~:~ ~: all¢~ due and proper notice thereof to thc oxxncrl,, of saidprope~l?.isherebx assessedlh::~,i · ::~.:c~,bt~-olsuchabatemcnl. lo~ NAME: Joyce. '¢4allace L., Lax~ rencc Il.. Itnbbard. ,loan J.. Larson. Barbara J.. Haroskev~icz. Patricia J.. £'~r.,o. Judith J. & Joyce. Lauren M. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 and 6. Bh~ck D. South Tamiami Heights. as recorded and platted in Plat book 3. Page 44. Public Records of Collier Count>'. Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERI-:NCI:.=: 21177 FOLIO #: 744122400112 The Clerk shall ~bx re~:i,:: i. :-, mail} mail a cop? o~ this Resolulion along xxith thc Notice of Assessment o] Lien to thc {*.'. :~,: -' ,,: l in~: aboxe-descnbed properU. ]t v.'ilhm l',,,enlX days ol the date of mailing thai cop?. tl~ , ,v. nc~ Jail:- to deli\er paymenl m tull Io Collier Count?. thc Resolution and Notice ofAsscssmenl ~!,al :~,' recto'dod rathe official record~,ofCollic~ Countx. and bv recording shall constitute a lien a~,,m-~ d'~c aboxe-described real propcrt.x, and to th: extent allox~ed bx leu. shall al~o be a lien up~,; [:[} orhc~ real and/or personal propcrt.x ox~ned bx the noted propert.,, owner(s! in Collier Count.~ This Resolution passed a~d duly adopted by the Board of Courtly Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this __ da5 el .2(}(12. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk · James N. Coletta. Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant Count.',' Auome? F LIEN~'MSWR RESOLUTION 2002 BOARD OF COtSNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COk.NTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN Joyce, Wallace L., Lawrence H., DATE: Hubbard, Joan J., Larson, Barbara J., Haroskewicz, Patricia J., Corse, Judith J. & Joyce, Lauren 506 QUINNIPIAC AVE NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 REF. IN'd.# 2078 FOLIO # 74412200000 LIEN NL~MBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 and 6, Block D, South l'amiami Heights. as recorded anti platted in Plat book 3, Page 44. Public Records of Collier Count)', Florida. You. a> the owner<s~ of the propen.\ abe\e-described, as recorded in the iccord- maintained bx thc office of the Property Appraiser. are hereb> adxised thai the Code Enforccmem Directoi, did determine a public nuisance existed on tot 5. and consUluted a x iolauon oI coulql\ regulations oil Decemher 17, 2001. and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on thc above propen.x prohibited bx Ordinance No. 99-51. as amended and set\ ed a notice of x iolation upon you. The nuisance ~-; Vt, EEl)S: ACCUMULATION OF VVEEDS. OVERGRO~,VTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You have failed to timely abate such expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of GRASS. OR OTHER NON-PROTECTEI) nuisance: whereupon. H was abaled bx the FIiZTY-FIVE ($~.00) DOLLARS and ap, administrative cosl of Two-hundred ($200.00} dollars for a total of TWO-HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE t$255.00t DOLLAP~q. Such cost. bx Resolution of the Board of Count> Commissioners of Collier Coun~. Florida, shall become a lien on your propen5 when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TII~YELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F LIENS MSTR AP.~r./i~A ITEI~ APR O ,4 200? 0 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 19 21 25 2(, 2- 30 32 35 34 35 30 37 38 30 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COI, TNTY COMMISSIONTRS PROVDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NLTISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as pro``'ided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixe cost incurred by the Count.~. shall be assessed against such propen5: and WHEREAS. the cost thereof to the Count', as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners. logethe~ with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon tine property against which made until paid: and WHEREAS. the assessment shall become due and payable no later than t``tentx t211~ daxs of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of txvelve percent (12G) per annum. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMM1SSIONTRS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that Iot!~} 5 the propen.x described follow s. haxln£ been abated of a pubhc nmsance after due and proper nonce thereof Io tine of said property, us herebx assessed the follov, ing costs of such abatement, to xt it NAMI~: Joyce, V~'allace L., Laxvrence H.. Hubbard..loan ,I.. Larson. llarbara ,I.. Haroskeu'icz. Patricia J.. Corso, Judith J. & Joyce. Laureu LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 and 6, Block D. South Tamiami Heights. as recorded and platted in Plat hook 3. Page 44, Puhlic Records of Collier County. Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: 2078 FOLIO #: 74412200000 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a cop3 of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owneHs~ of the above-described property. If within m'entx 1'2~31 daxs of the date of mailing that cop3, the o``~ her fails to deliver pa3 ment in full to Collicr Cotmtx. tlqc Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Count,,'. and by recording shall constitule a lien against the above-described real property, and to the extent alloxxed by lax``, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal propeFt) owned bx lite noted property owner(s)in Collier County. This Resolution passed and dui3' adopted bv the Board of Count,,' Commissioner> o~ Collier Count,',', Florida. this __ da,,' of .2002. ATYEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk James N. Coletta. Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency': Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant Count.')' Attornex APR g 9 2002 F: LIEN,' MSTR RESOLLWION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER CO[~TY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN PALM RIVER ESTATES. INC DATE: 321 VIKING V(AY NAPLES. FL 34110 REF. INV.# 2017 FOLIO #: 65274720009 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPIION: Lofts) 851.852.853.855,856 and 857, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3. Page 96, public records of Collier Count)', Florida. You. as the ownerts} t,f ¢,~' propcrU aboxe-described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office ol the Propc~t', .-Xppr',~ser. arc herebx advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public ntnsa~:.c c\~sted on lot 856. and constituted a violation of counl) regulalions on Seplember 19. 2001. ::,~i ~,~,!~_.d thc abatemen! of a certain nuisance ex~stmg on thc above property prohibited bx Oid:n:t~i.~ 5, t,t~ 51. as alnended and served a nolice of xiolation upon xou. The nuisance 1,YEEDS: ACCUMULATI(IN (}1 :\IA-A)5. GRASS. OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGRO~TIt IN EXCESS Ot l, You haxc failed tu t~!;~c '. =~b,~?.' such nuisance: whereupon, il was abaled expenditure of public funds a~ a ,5:. ,'.-! of FIFI'Y-H'VE ($55.00} DOLLARS and an administrmixe cosl of Tt~'o-hundred ~$200.00~ dollars fora loml of TIVO-ItUNDRED FIFT/'- FIVE ($!55.00} DOLLARS. Such cosl. by Resolmion (,1 thc Board of Courtly Commissioners of Collier Count5, Florida. shall become a lien on xour propzH > x~ hen recorded afte~ approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED 1N TI-IlS NOTICE ~IAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALE OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F LIENS,' MSTR LN:M- APR 6 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 _27 2S 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 30 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 45 4(> 4'7 48 49 50 51 52 53 5.4 55 56 5'7, 58 59 60 RESOLUTION NO. _00_- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF CO[WTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEM]ENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred bv the Count3', shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the Count\ as to each parcel shall be calculaled and reported to the Board of Count) Commissioners, together v, ith a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against ~xhich made until paid: and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than menlx (2(/~ days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of tx', elve percenl (12%) per annum. NO\V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORII)A. that lofts} 856 the property described a> follows, having been abated ora public nuisance al~c~ duc and proper notice ItqercoI to the ov.'nert~,~ of said property, is hereb`` assessed the lollowing co~,Is t,i such abatement, to/t it: NAME: PALM RIVER ESTATES, INC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lotts) 851.852.853,855.856 and 857, Palm River Estates. [:nit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3. Page 96. public records of Collier Count.~. Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: 2017 FOLIO #: 65274720009 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail~ mail a cop3 of tt~is Resolution along with thc Notice of Assessment of Lien to the o``~neris) of lhe abex c-described propc~%, lt' x~ilhin l~cntx t'21)~ days of the date el mailing lhat cop). ltqe ox~ner lail~ lc, dchxer payment in lull to Collier Cotmlx. thc Resolution and Notice of Assessmenl shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Counlx. and by recording shall constitute a hen against thc abo``c-dcscrJbed real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal propen) owned by the noted properly owner(s) in Collier Count,,. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this __ da), of .2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COLWTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk James N. Coleua, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant Count.,,' Attorney F: LIEN/MS'TR RESOL/rrlON BOARD OF COUNTY COSIMISS1ONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTNIENT COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN J n K INDUSTRIES INC. 2375 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. NAPLES, FL 34103 DATE: REF. INV.# 2066 FOLIO #: 31055005252 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 22, Block 51, Embassy Woods Golf & Country Club at Breltone Park, Phase One, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 17, Page 4"/, Public Records of Collier County. Florida. Tou. as the o~nerl~,l of the property above-described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser. are herebx adxised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public hmS:race exmted on lot 22. and constituted a xiolation of county regulations on November 29.20{}1. and ordered the abatement of a cenmn nmsance existing on above property prohibiled bx Ordinance No, 99-5 t, as amended and serxed a notice of ;iolation upon you. The nuisance is: EXOTICS: ACCUMULATION OF PROHIBITED SPECIES ON t,'NIMPROVED LAND LOCATED ¥~'ITHIN 200' OF IMPROVED, SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY You have failed to nmely abate such nuisance: whereupon, it x~as abated by thc expenditure of public funds al a d~rect cosl of T%¥O. ItLTNDRED FORTY-FIVE ($245.00~ DOLLARS and an admimstratixe cost of T~vo-hundred {$200.00} dollars fo~ a total of FOUR- ItUNDRED FORT¥-FI%'E (¢~,A5.00) DOLLA1Lq. Such cost. b5 Resolution of the Board of Coumy Commissioners of Collier CounLx. Florida, shall become a lien on your propens' when recorded after approval by lhe Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE ASIOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN (~QLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/Mg'r'R LNAL APR 0 9 ?097 i- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 2O 27 28 29 3i 3" 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 45 46 4'7 4'8 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COI ,rNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AN[ENDED WHEREAS, as proxided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordipance No. 91-47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrati'~e cost incurred by the Count.,,'. shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS. the cost thereol to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of Count,, Commissioners. together ~ailh a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessme~.~ shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid: WHEREAS. the assessmcn: sba!! become due and payable no later than lwentx 12(11 days of the date of the Legal Nom:c c,! .N>>c~,mcnt and interesl shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution ~- recorded at the rate of twelxe percent (12%) per annum NOW. TI-flSREFORE. bE 1'I RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMM1SS1ONTRS OF COLLIER ('()1 '<-1 h'. FLORIDA, that lous) 22 tile property described folio,as, ha\lng been abated oi a pLtb',i. : .:~-:m.:c alter duc and proper notice thereol to tile ov, nel'lS) of said propert.',, i~ hcl-ebx asse~-scd iht !,. ,,'.' i~52 co>t5 oI such abatemenl. Io NAME: J 51 K INDUSTRIES. IN(.'. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 22. Block \1. l-~mbass.x ~,oods Golf & Country Club at Brettone Park, Phase One. according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 17. Page 47. Public Records of Collier Count.,,. Florida. COST: $445.00 REFEREN CI-?: 2066 FOLIO #: 31055005252 Thc Clerk shall {b.~ rcguta¢ ['.S. mai]~ mail a cop>' of this Resolution along '~ith iht Notice of Assessmenl of Lien to thc ~,xx:-~::',-. ,,t tile above-described propert>. If ~ithin days of the date of mailing that cop>. thc ~,x,.ner fails to deli\er payment in full to Collier Count\. thc Resolution and Notice of Asscssmenl sh::',5 {,c ~ccorded in the official records of Collier Count\. and by recording shall constitute a lien ak'mn~ the aboxe-descfibed real prope~y, and to the extent allo~ed bx lax\. shall also be a lien uptm ail other real an&'or personal propcn) o~ned by the holed property oa'ner(s) in Collier Count\. This Resolution passed and dtA.x adopted by the Board of Count>' Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. this__ da,, oi .2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COU.'N~Y, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk BY: 'James N. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficienc.xT e Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant Count> Attomcx F LIEN,' MSTR RESOLUq'ION BOARD OF COLNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNT'I', FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN WATSON, LARRY J. DATE: 2190 41st TER S~,V NAPLES, FL 34116 REF. INV.# 2064 FOLIO #: 35780000007 LIEN NLqVIBER: LEGAl. DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 76. GOLDEN GATE, Unit 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 5, pages 65 lhrough 77. inclusive, public records of Collier County, Florida. You. as the ox\net(si of the propen.x abe\e-described, as recorded in thc record< maintained bv the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereb;' adxised that the Code Enforcement Director. did determine a public nuisance existed on lot 1. and constitmed a xiolation of regulanons on November 19. 2001. and ordered thc abatement of a certain nuisance e×isling on the above properl.\ prohibited bx Ordinance No. 9Y-5 t. as amended and serxed a notice of \'iolatioll upon you. The nuisance is: WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS. OR OTttER NON-PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" Tou ha, e failed to timelx abate such nmsancc: \~hereupon. it was aN,led expenditure of public lunds at a direct cost of FIFTY-FIVE ($55.0¢D DOLLARS and an administrative cost of T~'o--hundred ($200.00i dollars for a total of T~,VO--HUMDRED FIFTS- HVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cosl. bx Resolution of the Board of Count.x Commissioners of Collier Count.x. Florida. shall become a lien on ?'our property \~ hen recorded after approxal b> the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOL~ SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST.ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COL,~TY. F LIENS,' !I~'IS-FR I..NAL 1 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 19 20 21 2-: 24 2: 26 2~ 29 3O 34 36 37 42 45 ,46 47 45 49 50 51 52 $4 56 57 59 61 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COLSX/Y COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS. as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixe cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the Count,,' as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together ,a ith a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon thc property against v,'hich made until paid: and WHEREAS. the assessment shall become due and pa.,.ablc no later than tv. entx (201 days of the date of the Legal Notice (of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that lot{s) 1 the propen> described as follox~ s, having been abated of a public nmsance after due and proper nonce thereof IO the oxxncns~ of said propen), is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatemenl. NAME: V~'ATSON, LARRY J. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lo! 1, Block 76. GOLDEN GAI[. ['nit 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 5~ pages 65 through 77. inclusi',e, public records of Collier Count)', Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: 2064 FOLIO #: 35780000007 The Clerk shall lb.'.' regular U.S. mail) mail a cop.', of this Resolution along x~ith the Notice of Assessment of Lien 1o the ownensl of the aboxc-descril~ed properI). If within m'entv (20~ days of the date of mailing that cop)', the or, net fails to delix er pa) ment in full lo Collier Countx. the Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the oflicia] records of Collier Count), and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above-described real propert), and lo the extenl allox~ed by lax~. shall also be a lien upon all olher real an&or personal propen) ox~ned bx the noted propert) owner(s) in Collier Count,,'. This Resolution passed and dui3' adopted by the Board of Count',' Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2002. ATrEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COL! .IFR COUN~I'Y, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficienc)~~ Thomas C. Palmer. Assistant County Attorney ' James N. Colettm Chairman F: LIEN,' MSTR RESOLUTION APR 0 9 200? pg. SUMMARY FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WATER UTILITY FACILITIES FOR BOYNE SOUTH OBJECTIVE: The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, to accept the conveyance of the water facilities. CONSIDERATIONS: 1) The Developer of Boyne South, has constructed the water facilities within dedicated easements to serve this development. See attached location map. 2) Preliminary acceptance was approved by the Community Development and Environmen%al Services staff on August 25, in accordance with Ordinance 97-17. 1997, 3) Staff has recorded all appropriate legal documentation which had been reviewed by the County Attorney's office for legal sufficiency. 4) The wa5er facilities have been operated and maintained by the Collier County Water-Sewer District during the one 1) year warranty period. 5) A final inspection to examine for any defects in materials and workmanship was conducted by the Coramunity Development and Environmental Services Division staff and found to be satisfactory. 6) The Utilities Performance Security (UPS), in the form of a Cash Bond in the amount of $31,1551.00, will be released to the Project Engineer or the Developer's designated agent upon the Boards approval. 7) Water Facilities have been reviewed by Roy Anderson of Public Utilities. He has approved Executive Summary for Final Acceptance via email dated March 20, 2002. FISCAL I~PACT: The water facilities were constructed without cost to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. The cost of operating and maintaining the water facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues. Executive Summary Boyne South Page Two GROWTH M~NAG~R4ENT IMPACT: This project has been connected to the County Regional Water Treatment Plant. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator recommends that the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, accept the water facilities for Boyne South, and release the UPS to the Project Engineer or the Developer's designated agent. PREPARED BY: Shirley Nix, Engineering Technician !! Enginee~g Review Services Date REVIEWED BY: Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Review Services Manager Date APPROVED BY: Joseph K. S~hmitt, Administrator COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES attachments ha't6 L NAPLES R£SER v~: S~LVER ~ARCO 5HO~ES / FIDDLer'S C~EEK COLLIER STATE AGEhk~A tTE~ APR 0 9 2002 THIRTY ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY ONE AND 00/100 NOT VALID IF OVE~ $~1,551.00 m"- 3. I~,DDDD 3. q~: lr-.L, ~,DD 3, qG ~,,~' ~ -.,.~-~ ?~.~,~,~'r~'~,~'~ ~?~ ~A~ ~FL~CTIS~E %'AT~MARK ONTH~BAC~ THE O~GINALDOCL~MENT HASP~EFLECT~9~WATE~MAP~ O-N-TH~ BA~ Official Receipt- Collier County Board CDPR1103 - Official Receipt of County Commissioners rTrans Number I Date Post Date 21174 ! 6/16/97 9:00:29 AM ~ 6/16/97 Payment Slip Nbr i MS 17649 BOYNE USA SOUTH, INC. BOYNE SOUTH Payor' NATIONS BANK Fee Information Fee Code ! Description ', GL Account Amount: Waived 12BOND i DEPOSITS-COMM DEV (CASH BOND) 67000000022011300000 $31551.00 Total $31551.00 Payments [-~yment Code !Account/Check Number Amount ,,CHECK 1896426 $31551.00 Total Cash ~ $0.00 Total Non-Cash $31551.00 Tot~l Paid $31551.00 C.,ashi~rllocation: GAR:RET'r_s / 1 User: NIX._S Collier Couw[y Board of Courrty Commissioners CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT Print 0 9 2002 9:00:55 AM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CODE ENFORCEMENT LIEN RESOLUTION APPROVALS OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to adopt separate Resolutions assessing separate liens against certain parcels identified in the Resolutions in order to recover public funds expended to affect the abatement of public nuisances at such locations, all as provided for in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, the Collier County Litter, Weed and Exotics Control Ordinance. CONSIDERATIONS: Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, mandates the Board to impose a lien against property when an invoice to recover public funds expended to affect the abatement of a public nuisance is not paid at the expiration of twenty (20) days of the date of the notice. The following property owner's have not remitted the invoiced amounts. Case No. Owner of Record Case Summary Lien Amount a. Violation determined 12/12/01 b. Notice of Violation served 12/17/01 2001120449 Domingucz. John c. Notice of Violation Posted n/a S300.00 d. Unabated nuisance verified 12/28/01 e.Nuisance abated with public funds 01/21/02 f. Owner invoiced for costs 02/04/02 a. Violation determined 10/03/01 b.Notice of Violation served 10/17/01 2001100216 Graham. Monroe & Daisy B. c. Notice of Violation Posted n/a S255.00 d. Unabated nuisance verified 10/25/01 e.Nuisance abated with public funds 01/17/02 f. Owner invoiced for costs 01/30/02 a. Violation determined 08/24/01 b.Nolice of Violation served refused 2001081030 Johnson. Mary c.Notice of Violation Posted 09/17/01 $1.200.00 al. Unabated nuisance verified 10/29/01 e.Nuisance abated with public funds 01/21/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 01/25/02 ~A APR 0 9 2002 a'Vi°lati°n determined 10/06/00 b.Notice of Violation served no green card 2000100379 Palm River Est. Inc. c.Notice of Violation Posted 11/27/00 $245.00 d. Unabated nuisance verified 12/07/00 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 12/11/00 f. Owner invoiced for costs 12/19/00 a. Violati on determined 10/06/00 b. Notice of Violation served no green card 2000100381 Palm River Est. Inc. c. Notice of Violation Posted 11/27/00 $245.00 d. Unabated nuisance verified 12/07/00 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 12/11/00 f. Owner invoiced for costs 12/19/00 a. Violation determined 09/19/01 b. Notice of Violation served n/a 2001090580 Gillis, Albena J. c. Notice of Violation Posted 10/02/01 $255.0(/ d. Unabated nuisance verified 10/15/01 e. Nuisance abated with public funds 10/24/01 f. Owner invoiced for costs 10/26/01 , Upon the Board's adoption of the Resolutions. copies of such and the Legal Notices of Assessment will be mailed to the respective property owners. If the property owners fail to pay the amounts specified in the respective Resolutions within twenty (20) days hereof, the Clerk to the Board will record the Resolutions in the official records of the County. FISCAL IMPACT: A total reimbursement of $.2,500.00 may be anticipated by voluntary action or foreclosure. The only expense projected to be incurred by the Count3 is the cost of recording the Liens, which is estimated to be approximately $12.50 per lien, totaling $75.00, which is budgeted and available in the current fiscal year Code Enforcement budget GROWTH IVI_a~NAGEMENT IMPACT: This request will have no impact on the County's Growth Management Plan. RECOMNIENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached Resolutions. PREPARED BY: Iliana Martinez, Customer Service Specialist~ Code Enforcement ^TE: O '5' APF ~ ~ 200.'. REVIEWED BY' Code Enforcement SUBMITTED BY: DATE: Michelle Edwards Arnold. Director Code Enforcement APPROVED BY' DATE: ~ - ,.2 C- C .x JosePh K. Schmi{t. Aktministrator Community Development & Environmental Services BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER CO[.~TY. FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN DOMINGUEZ, JULIO DATE: 74 ASHLEY ST BRIDGEPORT, CT 66101617 REF. IN\:.# 2089 FOLIO #: 36247840000 LYEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block 175, Unit 5 Part - GOLDEN GATE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 122 of ihe Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s~ of the property above-described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Propert> Appraiser. are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nu~=a~.c cx~sl,.d on lot $, and constituted a violation of count)' regulations on December 28, 2001. and ~,.,'dcrcd thc ~batement of a certain nuisance existing on lhe above property prohibited by Ordinance N,,. t~!~-51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance is: LITTER: PROHIBITED Dt~iP1N(,. ACCU*IUL&TION, STORAGE OR BURIAL OI'- LITTER, WASTE OR ABANDONED PROPERTY. You have failed to umc]'~ ~ma:~. such nuisance: whereupon, it was abated by expenditure of public funds at a direct ,'c,~l ol ONE-Ht~DRED ($100.00~ DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two-hundred ($200.00~ dollars for a total ofWttREE-llt~'I)RED DOLLARS. Such cost. by' Resolution of thc Board of Counly Commissioners of Collier County. Florida. shall become a lien on your prope.q.x xx hen recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY REfiUL'f IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY 1N COLLIER COUNTY. F LIENS/MSTR LNAL E--ND * ITE ' APR 0 9 ?00;' 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1.4 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 23 24 25 26 2- 29 3O 3i 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 44 45 40 ,47 ,48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONTRS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATENIENT OF PUBLIC N~UISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51. as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrati',e cost incurred by the Count.',,, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS. the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against xx hich made until paid: and WHEREAS. the assessment shall become due and payable no later than txxentx t20, daxs of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of meIve percent (12~) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLYER COL.'NTY. FLORIDA, that lot(s) 8 of the propen.x described as follm~ s, having been aba~ed of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the ov, nerls~ of said properly, is herebx assessed the folio\ring costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: DOMINGk~Z. JULIO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8. Block 175. Unit 5 Parl - GOLDEN GATE. according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 122 of the Public Records of Collier County. Florida. COST: $300.00 REFERENCE#: 2089 FOLIO #: 36247840000 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a cop3' of this Resolution along with thc Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s} of the above-described property. If u, ithin IV, entx (20; days of the date of mailing that cop3', the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier Counix. the Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Count',7. and bx recording shall constitute a lien against the aboxe-descnbed real property, and to the extent allowed by law. shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted propell3 owner(s)in Collier Count\. This Resolution passed and dui.,,' adopted by the Board of Count3' Comrmssioners of Collier County, Florida, this __ day of 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION'ERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:~.) O Vv'~- ' ?~~~'"~ Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant Count.,,' Attorney 'James N. Coletta, Chairman F LIEN/MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF COL,~TY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH 1TS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLL1ER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN GRAHAM, MONROE & DAISY BELL DATE: PO BOX 122 COPELAND, FL 33926 REF. INV.# 2101 FOLIO #: 1134600003 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 44: Description of land in the North 1/2 of Copeland Village lying in the NE % of Section 13. Township 52 South, Range 29 East. Collier County, Florida. Commencing at the East % corner of Section 13, Township 52 South, Range 29 East, Collier County. Florida: thence North 68 04'26" ~,Yest 987.57 feet. said corner being the place of ending of s-857 as described in Deed Book 42. Page 142 and also the PLACE OF BEGINNING of a 50 foot wide strip of land for count)' roads as described in Deed Book 42. Page 303.Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South 42 06'~A,'est 37.00 feet; thence North 52 14'West 134.40 feet: thence North 0 51; East 97.00 feet to "intersection point C" described in said Deed Book 42. Page 303. thence along the centerline of "c" street north 88 39' V~'est 364 feet; thence North I 21' East 25.00 feet for a PLACE OF BEGINNING: thence continuing North I 21' East 100.00 feet: thence South 88 39' East 105.00 feet: thence South 1 21' '~Vest 100.00 feet; thence North 88 39' West 105.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING. You. as the ox~nertsl oi thc prope~l} above-described, as recorded in thc record> maintained bx the office of tile Propcn} Apprmser. are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director. did determine a public nmsance existed, and consliluled a violation of county regulations on October 25, 2001. and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on tile above propert) prohibiled by Ordinance No. 99-51. as amended and ser,,ed a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance is: WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF VfEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES. You hax'e failed to timely abate such nuisance: whereupon, it was abated by thc expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFT~LFI~'E ($55.00) DOLLARS and an adrmnistrative cost of 'rwo-hundred ($200.00) dollars for a tolal of TWO- HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of ~he Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILtrRE TO TISYELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED YN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY YIN COLLIER COUNTY. AG~_NDA F: LIENS~ MSTR LN AL 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .40 41 42 43 45 46 47 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 65 66 RESOLLrl'ION NO. 2002- A RESOLLrTION OF THE BOARD OF CO/rNTY COMMISSION'ERS PROVDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, 1N ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AM]ENDED WHEREAS. as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixe cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the Count\ as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners. together with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid: and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than m'entv (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution ~s recorded at the rate of twelve percent (I 2q ) per annum. NOW. THEREFORE. BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COL'~TY COMM1SSIONTRS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that the properU described as follox~s. having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice lhereof to the o~ner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the folloxt ing costs of such abatement, to ~ it: NAME: GRAHAM, MONROE & DAISY B. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 44: Description of land in the North ~.5 of Copeland Village lying in the NE % of' Section 13, To'anship 52 South, Rauge 29 East, Collier CounD, Florida. Commencing at the East % corner of Section 13, Tonnship 52 South. Range 29 East. Collier Count), Florida: thence North 68 04'26" ~'est 987.57 feet. said corner I~ing the place of ending of s-837 as described in Deed Book 42, Page 142 and also the PLACE OF BEGINNING of a 50 foot ~ide s~rip of land for count) roads as described in Deed Book 42, Page 303.Public Records of Collier Count.',', Florida: thence South 42 06'%%'es1 37.00 feet: thence North 52 14'V~'est 134.40 feet: thence North 0 51; East 97.00 feet to "intersection point C" described in said Deed Book 42, Page 303. thence along the eent~rline of "c' street north 88 39' ~l,'est 364 feet: thence North 1 21' East 25.00 feet for a PLACE OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North I 21' F.,asl 100.00 feet; thence South 88 39' East 105.00 feet: thence South 1 21' West 100.00 feet; thence North 88 39' West 105.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE#: 2101 FOLIO #: 1134600003 The Clerk shall lb>' regular U.S. mail) mail a cop) of this Resolution akmg with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the aboxe-described prope~). If ,aithin ~wenty (20) da'~s of the date of mailing that cop3, the ortner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier Count)'. the Resolution and Notice of Assessmem shall be recorded in the officiaI records of Collier Count)'. and b) recording shall constitute a lien agains~ the above-described rea] properb. and Io the extent allox~ed b> lay,. shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal properS> owned by the noted propert> owner(s) in Collier Count>. This Resolution passed and dul; adopted by the Board of Count.-,' Commissioners of Collier CounD. Florida. this __ day of __. 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COLrlN'TY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY:, BY: Deputy Clerk Approveat as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. ll~'lmer. Assistant Count>' Attorney James D. Carter. Ph.D., Chairman F: LIEN/MS'IR RESOLUTION AGENDA ITE~ APR 0 t BOARD OF CO[~TY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF L1EN JOHNSON, MARY DATE: 1764 AQUARIUS CT. FT. MYERS, FL 33916 REF. INV.# 2083 FOLIO #: 74030640000 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 20, Block 1, South Immokalee Heights, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3. Page 29, Public Records of Collier Count)', Florida. You. as the o;~nerfs) of the propert.x above-described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser. are hereby advised that the Code Enforcemen~ Director, did determine a public nuisance existed on lot 20. and constituted a violation of counLx regulations on October 29, 2(}01. and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on thc above properLx prohibited b,x Ordinance No. 99-51, as amended and served a notice of violation upun you. The nuisance is: X, VEEDS: ACCLBIULATION OF ~3,'EEDS. GRASS. OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGRO¥/IH 1N EXCESS OF 18". LITTER: PROH1BIIED D[BIPING, ACCE~IULATION, STORAGE OR BURIAL OF LITTER, WASTE OR ABANDONED PROPERT5'. You haxe failed to timely abate such nuisance'- whereupon, it was abated by thc expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of ONE-IHOUSAND 151.000.00'~ DOLLARS and an administratixe cost of T,,vo-hundred ($200.00~ dollars for a total of ON'E-THOU. SAND TV, O- HUNDRED ($1.,200.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County comrmssioners of Collier County, Honda, shall become a lien on )'our proper~y when recorded after approval by the Board. FAII,URE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMO[~NT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE ]kLAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY' IN COLLIER CO[~NTY. F LIENS,' MSTR LNAL APR 2OD2 p~. ~'~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 lO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1s 10 20 21 23 24 25 26 2-7 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COL~TY COM~IlSSIONERS PROVDING FOR THE ASSESSN{ENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PLq3LIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47. AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administratixe cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners. together with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal. ~.alid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid: and WHEREAS. the assessmen: shall become due and payable no later than t,.xcntx 120~ day's of the date of the Legal Notice of :\s,.essment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balanee beginning on the date this Resolution is recordzd at the rate of tx~elxe percent (12(~ } per annum. NO\V. THEREFORE. BI! t7 RESOLVED BT THE BOARD OF COUNT'Y COMMISSIONTRS OF COLLIER COl.-NTh. ]~LORIDA. that lot!s) 20 of the property described follows, having been abated of a pubh,: m~-a~,:c after due and proper not,ce thereof to the ortner!,; ~ of said property, is hereby assessed the roi ,, ,v ~n~' ,:,~sts of such abatement, to NAME: JOHNSON, MARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 20. Block 1. South lmmokalee Heights. according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 29, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $1,200.00 REFERENCEv: 2083 FOLIO #: 74030640000 The Clerk shall (b5 regular L'.S. maJll mail a cop3 of this Resolution along with thc Notice of Assessment of Lien lo the o:x net/., i of the above-described propert3. If ,.~ilhin l,.~ent~ (20~ days of the date of mailing that cop3. the t,;,.nc: lai}s to deli\er payment in full to Collier Count:. the Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County. and b3 recording shall constitute a hen again-t tt~c aboxe-descnbed real propert3. and to lbe extent allowed by ]ag', shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal properly ox~ned by lhe noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. this ___ da\ of .2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUN~I'Y COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk James N. Colelta, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas. atmer, Assistant' Count~,.' Attornex. F. LIIEN/MSTR RESOL1WION APR 0 § 2002 BOARD OF COLNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN PALM RIVER ESTATES, INC DATE: 321 VIKING WAY NAPLES, FL 34110 lIEF. INV.# 1742 FOLIO #: 65274760001 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot(s) 851,852,853.855.856 and 857, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3. Page 96. public records of Collier County. Florida. You. as the o~ner~s~ of thc property above-described, as recorded in the records mmntmned b; the office of the Propert~ .-X.l-,praL-c~. are hereb,', advised that the Code Enforcement Direclor. did determine a public nm.,,ancc emoted on 1o~ 85'7, and constituted a violation of count> regulations on December 7, 2000. and o:dc:cd thc abatement of a certain nuisance ex~stmg on the aboxe property proh~bHed bx Ordinance N,. ~;L,-51, a~ amended and serxed a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF \XEEI)S. GRASS. OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF You haxe failed to expenditure of public funds at a d~,'c:~' c~ such nuisance: whereupon, it was abated b3 the of FORT't;FI%~E ($45.00) DOLLARS and an administram, e cost of T~a'o-hundred ($20H.00~ dollars for a lmal of TWO-HUNDRED FORTY- FIVE ($245.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, b~ Resoluuon o: the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on )'our propc;% x~ lien recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOL .'NT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. LIENS; MSTR LN.kL 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2-1 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 3.4 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COU.~TY CONL\IISSION~RS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PU'BLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County. shall be assessed agmnst such property: and WHEREAS. the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of Count.,, Commissioners. together with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made unlil paid: and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than t~ent', (20~ days of the date of the Legal Notice ol ,Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of tx~elve percent (1,'>~) per annum. NOV','. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORID.*. that lolls) 857 the property described as follov, s. having been abated of a public nmsance after due and proper nolice thereof to the owner(si of said property, is hereby assessed the follov, ing costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: PALM RIVER ESTATES, INC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot(s) 851.852.853.855.856 and 857. Palm River Estates, Unit 2. per plat in Plat Book 3. Page 96. public records of Collier CourtD. Florida. COST: $245.00 REFERENCE#: 1742 FOLIO #: 65274760001 The Clerk shall thy regular U.S. mailI mail a cop.', of this Resolulion along with the Notice ot Assessment of Lien to the ownerts) of the abo'~e-dcscribed propert). If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that cop.'., the o,a net fails to detix er payment in full to Collier County, thc Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County. and b5 recording shall constitute a lien against the aboxe-described real propert>, and to the extent alloy, ed by lax~. shall also be a lien upon al} other real and/or personal propertyr ov,'ned by the noted property owneris) in Collier Count\. This Resolution passed and dui3' adopted by the Board of Count3, Commissioners of Collier Count.,,,, Florida, this __ day of .2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUN'TY COIV-~,'IISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk ,James N. Coletta. Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency. Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attome3' LIEN; MSTR RESOLL1TION APR 0 BOARD OF CO[~TY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN PALM RIVER ESTATES, 1NC DATE: 321 VIKING WAY NAPLES, FL 34110 REF. INV.# 1744 FOLIO #: 65274720009 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot(s) 851,852,853,855.856 and 857, Palm River Estates, Unit 2, per plat in Plat Book 3, Page 96, public records of Collier County, Florida. You. as the owner(s) of the property above-deschbed, as recorded in the records mainlained by the office of the Propen} Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did delemune a public nuisance existed on lot 856, and constituted a violalion of county regulations on December 7, 2000. and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the aboxe prope~5 prohibited b5 Ordinance No. 99-51. as amended and se~'ed a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance ~s: WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF B'EEDS. GRASS. OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You hnxc Giled to timeh aba~e such nuisance: whereupon, il was abated by the expenditure of public funds al a direcl cost of FORTY-FIVE 1~5.00) DOLLARS and an adminis~rmive cos~ of Tw~h~dr~ (~.001 ~l~m for a tomt of ~V~Hk~D FORTY- Such cosL by Resolmion of the B~d of Cowry C~ssion~s of Collier County. Flon~. s~ll ~come a lien on your pro. ny a'hen r~or~d after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY 1N COLLIER COUNTY. F LIENS/MSTR LN.~L 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 20 27 28 29 3o 31 32 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COL.~TY COMMISSIONERS PROVDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATENFENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99-51. AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS A.MENT)ED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47. as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property: and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together v, ith a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligatton upon the property against which made until paid: and WHEREAS. the assessment shall become due and payable no later than m'ent.x (201 days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance bemnning on the date this Resolution ~s recorded at the rate of twelve percent ( 129~ ) per annum. NO\V. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOL\TD BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COt.~TY. FLORIDA. that lousl 856 the property described as folio\vs, ha\lng been abated o!' a public nmsance after due and proper nonce thereof to the oxxner*s~ of said propert>, is hereby assessed the lolloxx mg costs of such abatement, to x~ it: NAME: PALM RIVER ESTA~i'ES. INC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot(s~ 851.852.853,855,856 and 857, Palm River Estates. Unit 2. per plat in Plat Book 3. Page 96. public records of Collier Count>'. Florida. COST: $245.00 REFERENCE#: 1744 FOLIO #: 65274720009 The Clerk shall (b.x regular U.S. maill mail a cop5' of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the oxvner(s) of the above-described propens. If within txventy days of the date of mailing that cop>. the oxvner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County. thc Resolution and Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier Count.x. and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above-described real property, and to the extent allowed by lax~. shall also be a lien upon all other rea] and/or personal property m~ned bv the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Comrmssioners of Collier County, Florida, this __ day of .2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COLrNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk BY: James N. Coletta, Chmrman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Auome3 F. LIEN,' MSTR RESOLLrrlON AGENDA FTEJ-A APR 0 g 2002 /3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN GILLIS, ALBENA J. DATE: 20201 PLYMOUTH RD APT 1005 DETROIT, MI 48228 REF. INV.# 2006 FOLIO # 36451080009 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16, Block 259, Unit 7 Part - Golden Gate according to plat thereof recorded in plat book 5 page 139 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida You. as the owner(s} of the property above-described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property' Appraiser, are hereby' advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed on Iot16. and constituted a violation of county' regulations on October 15, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on tile above property prohibited by Ordinance No. 99-51. as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance is: WEEDS: ACCLBIULAT1ON OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON-PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES. You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by lhe expenditure of public funds al a direct cost of FIFTY-FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an administratixe cost of Two-hundred ($200.00) dollars for a lotal of 'I~;O-11L~NDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of Courtly Comrmssioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property, when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOIYNI SPECIFIED IN TltlS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. LIENS/MSTR LNAL 1 4 5 g 17 2u 24 2s 26 2-7 29 s2 s4 4o 41 4s 44 4s 4'7 5o s7 s9 RESOLLWHON NO. 2002-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF pLrBLIC NUISANCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDLNANCE No. 99-51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91-47, AS AM]ENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99-51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91-47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed adrmnistrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County comrmssioners, together with a description of said parcel: and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid: and WHIEREAS. the assessmem sh:fll become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of lhe Legal Notice oI Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance bekinning on the date this Resolution ~s recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that lot(s) 16 of the proper1) described as follows, having been abated of a public nulsz~nce after due and proper not~ce thereof to the owner(st of said property, is hereby assessed the f,.q im,.m~ costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: GILLIS, ALBENA J. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16, Block 259. Unit 7 Part - Golden Gate according to plat thereof recorded in plat b'ook 5 page 139 of the Public Records of Collier Count)', Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE~: 2006 FOLIO #: 36451080009 The Clerk shall (by regula~ U.S. mail} mail a cop)' of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien lo the owneris! of the above-described propert). If x¥ithin twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy. the ox~ner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier Count)'. the Re'solution and Notice of Assessment shzdi be recorded in the official records of Collier Count), and bv recording shall constitute a lien agan'.s: the aboxe-described real propert>, and to the exten~ ailowed by laxv, shall also be a lien upon ali other real and/or personal property owned by the noted prope~y owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of Coumy Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of .2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNtrY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C.~Palmer, Assistant County Attorney BY: James N. Coletta, Chairman F: UEN! MSTR RESOLI_~F1ON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE COMMITTEE SELECTION OF HENDERSON, YOUNG & COMPANY FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS FOR RFP 02-3317 "CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDIES - FIRE" OBJECTIVE: Obtain Board's approval of Committee's selection of firms for professional consultant sen'ices in the preparation of a Fire Impact Fee update study and authorization to begin contract negotiations for subsequent Board approval. CONSIDERATIONS: Because of the need for timely information with regard to impact fees, it was determined by staff to be in the best interests of the County to combine multiple impact fee update studies into one Request for Proposals. However, each study will be managed and funded as a sepS. rate, distinct project. The Scope of Services included the following studies: Study 1 - Study 2 - Study 3 - Study 4 - Study 5 - Community and Regional Parks Impact Fee Update, Fire Protection Impact Fee Update Educational Facilities Impact Fee Update Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Update New Law Enforcement Impact Fee The RFP ,,,,'as issued in accordance with Florida State Statute 287.055, Consultant Competitive Negotiation Act, and publicly advertised on October 31, 2001. Notices were sent to 134 finns with 28 vendors requesting full packages. Four responses were received by the due date of November 21, 2001. Three of the four responses included the Fire Impact Fee update. A separate selection committee was used to rank order firms responding to each impact fee update study referenced in the RFP. Due to technical similarities and common data characteristics, the RFP indicated that one firm xvould be selected to prepare both the Law Enforcement and Correctional Facilities impact fee studies. The recommendations of these four selection committees have been brought to the Board in separate Executive Summaries. Due to a shared desire for cost savings and for a common, standard methodology of Fire Impact Fee rate calculation, the following agencies will jointly fund this study: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District East Naples Fire Control and Rescue District Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District Big Corkscrexv Island Fire Control and Rescue District Immokalee Fire Control and Rescue District Collier County Emergency Services Division (Isles of Capri and Ochopee Fire Control Districts) APR 0 9 2002 Fire Impact Fee Update Consultant Selection Page 2 A Selection Committee meeting for the Fire Impact Fee update was held on March 15, 2002. By consensus of the members, after review and discussion, the follov,'ing rank order of firms ,,,,'as determined: 1. Henderson, Young and Company 2. Tischler and Associates, Inc. 3. Fishkind & Associates, Inc. Staffwill negotiale an accelerated completion schedule to provide the results of these impact fees studies as soon as practicable. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: TI'tis will provide funding for the expansion of Collier County's independent and dependent fire districts' facilities inventories to accommodate growth. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. The final negotiated contract agreement for these studies will be brought back to the Board for final approval. A target budget ofS25,000 was identified in the RFP. The project will be funded entirely by Fire Impact Fees. The six (6) agencies participating in the study have committed to negotiating a fair and equitable cost sharing distribution agreement before the execution of the contract. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: (1) Approve the Committee's ranking of fim'~s. (2) Authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with Henderson, Young and Company. APR 0 9 2002 Fire Impact Fee Update Consultant Selection Page 3 ~hilh'p Ti'i~ndall, Impact Fe~Coorc~(nator Reviewed by: ]~~~--'~ /~~ Denny Baker, Business Manager, Office of Financial Management/CD&ES Date: Date: Stephen~ Y. ~am~ell, Purchasing Director Date: Reviewed by: Joseph K. Sclmfiti, Xdminisffator, Community Developmen( and Environm.ental Sen, ices Division y. / f' Date: ThomaS. Olliff, County Manager ( Date: ~5'/.~ 7/~ z- ~,. APR 0 ~ 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE MPO RECOMMEND TO THE FLORIDA COMMISSION FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED THAT THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BE RE-DESIGNATED COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR FOR COLLIER COUNTY, OBJECTIVE: That the Collier County Board of County Commissioners ("BCC") approve a Resolution whereby The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization ("MPO") recommends that the BCC serve as the Community Transportation Coordinator ("CTC") of Collier County. CONSIDERATIONS: Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes requires that the MPO, serving as the designated planning agency for the Transportation Disadvantaged program, recommend every three years, a qualified CTC to the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged ("CTD"). Additionally, The Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged Competitive Procurement Manual, compiled in accordance with Chapter 287, Florida Statutes, allows the MPO to nominate a governmental agency to serve as the CTC. The CTC is responsible for ensuring that coordinated transportation services are provided to the transportation-disadvantaged population in the designated service area (Collier County). Accordingly, the CTC arranges for this provision of transportation services in a manner that is cost-effective, efficient, and reduces fragmentation and duplication of services. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners currently serves as the Community Transportation Coordinator. Staff deems it appropriate and in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare for the BCC to continue in it's designated role as the CTC for Collier County. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This is consistent with Collier Count'y's Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners sign a Resolution requesting that the MPO recommend to the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged that Collier County Board of County Commissioners be re-designated as the Community Transportation Coordinator for Collier. APR - 9 2002 l~ob~t M. Herrin, g~)n, MP~.~Manage~' --" Reviewed by: '?~.~(~/[~.~.~ g~ Date: Jenner A. Belp~d~, Assistant County Attorney Appr°ved bY: N~a~E~~~~ ~~~Nation Services AdministerS[ / / AGENDA IT~,',..1 APR - 9 2002 ! 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 6O 61 62 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION RF~QUESTING TIIAT TIlE COLLIER COUNTY METROI'OLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION RECOMMEND TO Tile I:LORIDA COMMISSION FOR TIlE TRANSi'ORTATION DISADVANTAGED TllAT Tile COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BE RE-DESIGNATED COMMUNrFY TILa. NSPORTATION COORDILJATOR FOR COLLIER COUNTY. WHEREAS, Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes requires that thc Collier County Metropolitan Planning Commission ("MPO"), serving as the designated planning agency for the Transportation Disadvantaged program recommend, every three years, a qualified Community Transportation Coordinator ("CTC") to the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged ("CTD"); and WHEREAS, Tl~e Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged Competitive Procurement Manual, compiled in accordance with Chapter 287, Florida Statutes, allows the MPO to nominate a governmental agency to serve as the CTC; and WHEREAS, The CTC is responsible for ensuring that coordinated transportation services are provided to the transportation-disadvantaged population in the designated service area (Collier County). Accordingly, the CTC arranges for this provision of transportation services in a manner that is cost-effective, efficient, and reduces fragmentation and duplication of services; and WHEREAS, in 1999 Collier County Board of County Commissioners was designated the Community Transportation Coordinator roi' Collier Count>' and currently serves as the Community Transportation Coordinator; and WHEREAS, Collier County Board of County Commissioners deems it appropriate and in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare to continue in it's designated role as the Community Transportation Coordinator for Collier County. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization rccommcnd to the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners be re-designated Community Transportation Coordinator for Collier County. 2. The Collier Count>, Metropolitan Planning Organization notify the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged of the recommendation in accordance with this resolution and Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: By: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Approved as to form and Legal Sufficiency: Jenn"~fer A. Bel~dio Assistant County Attorney Commissioner James Coletta Chairman, Collier County BCC ,.,AGENDA APR - 9 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) 15 CY DUMP TRUCK, DIESEL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH BID # 02-3336, I~q t~v. ~ou~q? OF $77,222.00. OBJECTIVE: To purchase the replacement for an existing dump truck within the Road and Bridge section of the Transportation Operations Department. CONSIDERATIONS: Invitations to bid were sent out on January 18, 2002 and opened by the County Purchasing Department on February 6, 2002. Staff has reviewed the bids and recommends the bid submitted by Wallace International Trucks Inc., as being the lowest bid proposal meeting, or exceeding specifications. Summary of the bid tabulations is as follows: Vendor Name: Wallace International Trucks Inc. Palmetto Truck Center Freightliner of Tampa, LLC Total Price: $77,222.00 $80,800.00 $81,325.00 ,,~FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $77,222.00 are budgeted in Road and Bridge Fund ',~ 101 Capital' GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners award Bid #02-3336, to Wallace International Trucks Inc., for the purchase of one (1) 15 CY Dump Truck, Diesel. SUBMITTEDBY:~' Travis Gossard, Road and Bridge Supervisor REVIEWED B r: John Vliet, Road and Bridge Superintendent Steph~n Y.. Ca'ell, Pqrol~asi~S Director REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:Edw .a~i;;;~~on Operations Director Normar;/E: Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator / DATE: ~ ('~$/~ ~ DATE: DATE: APR O 9 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE FACILITIES RELOCATION AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $98,666 TO RELOCATE POWERLINE STRUCTURES ON LIVINGSTON ROAD BETWEEN I~/IMOKALEE ROAD AND THE LEE COUNTY LINE TO FACILITATE THE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 65041 OBJECTIVE: To gain Board approval of a Facilities Relocation Agreement with Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) for the relocation of powerline structures on Livingston Road which will allow construction of the road widening project to proceed in accordance with the approved design. CONSIDERATION: The Livingston Road, Phase IV, roadway improvement project is scheduled to begin construction in the second quarter of 2002. In order for the construction of the road widening to proceed, powerline structures must be relocated within the existing FPL easement. Approval and execution of the Facilities Relocation Agreement with FPL will allow this pole relocation to begin. A copy of the Facilities Relocation Agreement and the cost estimate are attached. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount ofS98,666 are available in the Transportation Road Impact Fee District 1 Fund. Source of funds are Impact Fees. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: (1) Approve the attached Facilities Relocation Agreement with FPL to relocate powerline structures on Livingston Road between Immokalee Road and the Lee County line at a cost of $98,666. (2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Facilities Relocation Agreement with FPL. SUBMITTED BY: i ~[,~-,-- Date: Dale A. B~athon, P.E., Principal Project Manager / 0~ Direct~ Tran~pofiation Engineering & Const.,~ct~? Management Depa~ment APPROVED BY: ' ~L Date: No~an~ Feder, AICP Transp~ion Administrator 5'- ,APR 0 9 2002 FACILITIES RELOCATION AGREEMENT (Government Entity) THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this __ day of 20 by and between Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, hereinafter called the Applicant, and FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in bade and Palm Beach Counties, Florida, hereinafter called FPL. WlTNESSETH: WHEREAS the Applicant intends to construct Livinqston Road, Phase IV, County Project No. 65041 and will require the relocation of certain incompatible and conflicting portions of FPL's Facilities and equipment, and WHEREAS FPL will incur costs in the Relocation of FPL's existing and proposed Facilities which costs would not have occurred but for the Applicant's construction, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the Applicant and FPL and other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree that FPL shall Rearrange the FPL Facilities and the Applicant shall reimburse FPL for the actual cost of such Relocation as follows: ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Agreement the following terms, whether used in the singular or plural, shall have the meanings set forth below ;;'hen used with initial capitalization: 1.1 Betterment is any increase in service capacity of the Replacement FPL Facilities, not attributable to Contractor's construction, over the service capacity of the FPL Facilities prior to Relocation and any upgrading of a Replacement FPL Facility above FPL's current minimum standard practices, as specified in Article III of this Agreement, that normally would be used on projects financed solely by FPL. Betterment does not include: (a) any increase in service capacity required by federal, state or local law which applies to FPL Facilities as of the date of construction of the Replacement FPL Facilities; (b) any increase in service capacity resulting solely from the replacement of devices or materials which at the time of construction of the Replacement FPL Facility are no longer manufactured, processed, or installed and used by FPL in projects financed entirely by FPL, (c) any upgrading of a Replacement FPL Facility requested by the Applicant, (d) any upgrading of a Replacement FPL Facility required by any agency responsible for regulation of FPL Facilities, (e) any upgrading of the Replacement FPL Facility which is necessitated by the Applicant's construction, if the replacement is the same as that used by FPL on FPL's own projects, or (f) any upgrading that will result in a reduction in the overall project cost. 1.2 Conversion is the replacement of existing overhead facilities with underground facilities. 1.3 Credit Ratio is the credit given to the Applicant in the form of a percentage derived by dividing the sum of the Betterment and the Non-Reimbursable Work Credit by the Total cost of the Relocation: Credit Ratio = Dollar Amount of Betterment + Non-Reimbursable Work Credit Total Cost of Relocation - The Land and Land Right Cost 1.4 Date Cost Estimate Received, for purposes of this Agreement, shall be deemed to be the day that the cost estimate was hand-detivered or transmitted by facsimile, or if mailed, five days from the date of postmark. 1.5 FPL's Facility or Facilities shall be, but shall not be limited to, any structure consisting of manholes, conduits, poles, wires, cables, substations, system protection equipment or other appurtenances, and associated equipment, and used by FPL in connection with the transmission and/or distribution of electric power. 1.6 Relocation and/or Relocate includes the terms "rearrange or rearrangement" and is the work performed by FPL under this Agreement and any activity made necessary by Applicant's construction which conflicts with or affects FPL, its Facilities, or service. Relocations shall include conversion of transmission facilities and shall include, but shall not be limited to, permanent or temporary support, protection, relocation, rearrangement, design, redesign, abandonment or reconstruction of the FPL Facilities and all other work required to provide continuity of service to FPL's customers which is a result of a conflict. 1.7 Replacement FPL Facility is any facility which will be constructed under the terms of this Agreement as a consequence of Relocation of an FPL Facility or portion thereof. 1.8 Salvaqe is the credit to the Applicant for the reusable materials recovered or removed by FPL less the Salvage Adjustment Credit. ~.'*'-~: ,,"~ ~ r~,':, ARTICLE II - IDENTIFICATION OF CONFLICTS, CONVERSIONS [ ., .. lit k-, 2.1 Known Conflicts. The Applicant shall reimburse FPL for costs associated with the Relocationiof the ~P../-. ~ ~a~ described and located on property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and ir'~corpor~t~<~h~rgin(--.UU/- page 1 of 6 Governmental Facilities Relocation Agreement (rev. 2/8/00) ! ~.-~g ~ 2.2 Other Conflicts. The identification of any other conflicting facilities of FPL requiring Relocation shall be undertaken by FPL pursuant to a subsequent written agreement between FPL and the Applicant. 2.3 Distribution Conversion. If an Applicant has requested a conversion of distribution facilities as part of a Relocation of Facilities, the FPL Distribution Facilities Conversion Agreement which is approved by the Florida Public Service Commission shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Indemnity and Insurance provisions of this Agreement shall apply to all Distribution Conversions which are part of a Reloc' tion. In addition, all other terms and conditions of this Agreement which are not expressly modified by th,, Addendum attached hereto shall remain in full force and effect. If there is a direct conflict between this Agreement and the attached Addendum, then the Underground Distribution Conversion Tariff and the Underground Distribution Conversion Agreement shall prevail as to that specific term or condition. m-_ Underground Distribution Facilities Conversion Agreement is attached hereto and incorporated herein. X This Project does not involve a conversion of electric distribution facilities. ARTICLE III - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT FACILITIES 3.1 Desiqn Standards. Engineering design standards and material specified shall meet FPL's Current Design Standards. In addition, the design of Relocations will be in conformity with all laws and regulations. 3.2 Construction Standards. Materials and construction procedures shall meet FPL's Current Construction Standards. In addition, Relocations or Replacement Facilities will be accomplished in conformance with all laws, codes and regulations. ARTICLE IV - REPLACEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY 4.0 Replacement Riqht-of-Way.. The Applicant shall provide FPL with replacement rights-of-way in one of the following manners: ___ (a) The Applicant shall reimburse FPL for costs associated with the identification and acquisition of replacement rights-of-way, including, but not limited to, FPL's attorney fees for costs in prosecuting or in connection with any condemnation actions for the acquisition of necessary rights-of-way. ___ (b) The Applicant shall convey or grant to FPL replacement rights-of-way sufficient to permit FPL to accomplish Relocations of the FPL Facilities and to operate and maintain the Replacement Facilities in accordance with FPL's customary practices. Such conveyances or grants of replacement rights-of-way shall be accomplished at no cost to FPL and in a form and substance satisfactory to FPL 4.1 Location of Replacement Riqht-of-Way. The Location of the aforesaid replacement rights-of-way are generally set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. ARTICLE V - COST ESTIMATES~ CREDITS AND BILLING 5.1 Full Cost. The Applicant shall pay FPL for the full cost of Relocation of the FPL Facilities. The work to be performed by FPL will be in accordance with the construction drawings attached hereto as Exhibit B. 5.2 Cost Estimate. The Applicant shall be responsible for the total cost of the project. The estimated cost to Relocate the FPL Facilities is (a) or (b) below: a. Relocation: $ 98,666.00. This cost estimate is set out in detail in Exhibit C attached hereto; or Relocation Conversion: Relocation: Distribution Conversion: $ 98,666.00 (Exhibit C) + $ 0 (Addendum) = Total Project Cost Estimate: $ 98,666.00 The Applicant understands and agrees that the amount set forth in Exhibit C is an estimate only. The Applicant shall be responsible for the total cost of the project. The cost for the Relocation portion shall not exceed 110% of a valid Relocation cost estimate, except as provided herein. page 2 of 6 Governmental Facilities Relocation Agreement (rev. 2/8/00) 5.3 5.4 Duration of Cost Estimate. A cost estimate is valid only: a. Prior to construction, for 180 days from the date of the estimate is received by Applicant (this includes the estimate attached as Exhibit C and any subsequent estimate) or b. As long as the scope of work (Relocation) upon which the estimate, is based has not been changed; whichever first occurs. Re-estimates, Scope of Work Chanqes. 5.4.1 Pre-construction. If the construction of the Relocation of the FPL Facilities has not commenced within 180 days of the date that the latest cost estimate is received by Applicant or if the scope of work ("Relocation") has been changed on any individual work order, prior to any construction, the estimate is invalid. A new estimate is required. FPL shall provide a re-estimate of the work prior to commencement of the Relocation by FPL. The Applicant shall agree in writing to pay the re-estimated cost and shall be responsible for the full cost of Relocation, not to exceed 110% of the re-estimate. 5.4.2 After Start of Construction. If after the start of construction, the Applicant requests a change in the scope of work (Relocation) of FPL Facilities or if FPL determines that there is a need for a change in the scope of work (Relocation) and such change causes either the credit ratio to change or the reimbursable cost of the project to change by 10% or more, FPL shall provide the Applicant with a new estimate as soon as practicable. The Applicant shall provide FPL with written approval of the re-estimate. The Applicant shall be responsible for any increased cost due to unknown or unforeseen physica~ conditions at the site which differ ..... ' ........... s in addition ma[enaHy rrom those originaiiy encountered. Increased costs cue to differing site ,.,,n,4;,;.-,~ are to the estimated amount and are not subject to the 110% cap on estimated costs. The Applicant shall receive a credit for Betterment and Salvage. The Applicant shall receive a credit for the payment of any non-refundable deposit required for estimates for underground installation included within a Relocation according to the terms of the FPL Distribution Conversion Tariff and FPL's Underground Distribution Conversion Agreement. 5.5.3 The Applicant shall receive a credit for payment made to FPL for a detailed cost estimate, if payment is required by FPL prior to issuing such estimate and if the Facilities Relocation Agreement has been entered into within 180 days of the date that estimate was received by the Applicant and the Relocation performed. 5.5.4 The Applicant shall receive no credit for payment for an estimate, and such payment shall not be refunded: (a) if the Applicant has not executed a Facilities Relocation Agreement within 180 days of the date that estimate was received by the Applicant, (b) if a subsequent estimate is required or (c) if the Applicant terminates the Agreement. 5.5.5 Any estimate provided to the Applicant after the initial, detailed estimate shall be done at additional cost and expense to AppIicant. Applicant's payment for estimates shall be credited or retained by FPL as provided above. Billinq and Payment. FPL shall bill the Applicant for cost incurred not more frequently than once monthly. The Applicant shall have twenty (20) days from the date of an invoice to approve the invoice and any accompanying information supplied by FPL. Failure to provide FPL with written notice to the contrary within the twenty (20) day period shall constitute approval by the Applicant of the invoice against which payment must be remitted in full to FPL within forty-five (45) days of the date of the invoice. If payment by the Applicant is not postmarked within forty-five (45) days of the date of the invoice, then a late payment charge shall be assessed in the amount of one percent (1%) of the amount of the billing per month, or the highest amount then permitted by law. Final Bill. Upon completion of the work, FPL shall at the earliest date practicable furnish to the Applicant a final and complete billing of all costs incurred in connection with performance of Relocation of the FPL Facilities less any prepaid credits for additional cost estimates. Refund and Effect of Termination. 5.8.1 Consistent with the terms of this Agreement, FPL shall refund to the Applicant any amounts which the Applicant has paid to FPL beyond the full cost of Relocation. 5.8.2 in the event that this Agreement is terminated due to the cancellation or indefinite suspension of work in furtherance of the Applicant's construction, the Applicant shall be responsible for the costs of Relocation already incurred, including but not limited to all engineering, design, equipment, and mat.e[ial,s...c~.s~.~.,.,.__._ costs, and f any, the costs of replacement facilities already nstalled, necessary to place FPL's F. ac~ities,j,nt~EM a permanent condition suitable to provide continuous re able electric service to the p~.b c4ir~ "~c~'~(~.~_~ ~-~ page 3 of 6 Governmental Facilities Relocation Agreement (rev. 2~8/00)I APR 0 9 2002 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.5 Credits. 5.5.1 5.5.2 with all applicable laws, regulations and FPL's usual practices as set forth in Article Ill herein. Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify or abrogate FPL's legal duty to mitigate damages. ARTICLE VI - AUDITS 6.1 Audits. All cost records and accounts of FPL directly related to the work performed under this Agreement shall be subject to audit by the Applicant for a period of c,~e year from the completion date of all work performed under this Agreement. Such audits shall be performed by [h.~ Applicant and in accordance with the following considerations: (a) the Applicant shall provide FPL with thirty (30) days wdtten notice requesting an audit, (b) the specific time of audit must be mutually agreed to, (c)information required for audit purposes shall be accounts and records kept by FPL directly related to Relocation and reimbursable costs, (d) the Applicant may request only information reasonably required by it concerning Relocation and such request for information shall be in wdting and shall include the purpose of the audits, (e)FPL shall make available the requested information at its offices dudng normal business hours, Monday through Fdday, (0 the Applicant shall bear any costs associated with any audits, including FPL costs, if any, and (g) information available under this Agreement shall not be used in violation of any law or regulation. ARTICLE Vll - GENERAL CONDITIONS 7.1 Benefit of Aqreement; Assiqnment. The provisions of this Agreement shaii inure to the benefit of and bind the successors and assigns of the Parties to this Agreement but shall not inure to the benefit of any third party or other person. This Agreement shall not be assigned by either Party except upon receipt of the prior written permission of the other Party. Such permission shall not be unreasonably withheld. 7.2 Nonwaiver. The failure of either Party at any time to require performance by the other Party of any provision hereof shall not affect the full right to require such performance at any time thereafter. Waiver by either Party of a breach of the same provision or any other provision shall not constitute a waiver of the provision itself. 7.3 Limitations of Liability. Neither Party shall be liable in contract, in tort (including negligence), or otherzvise to the other Party for any incidental or consequential loss or damage whatsoever including but not limited to loss of profits or revenue on work not performed, for loss of use or underutilization of the Party's facilities, or loss of use of revenues or loss of anticipated profits resulting from either Party's performance, nonperformance, or delay in performance of its obligations under this Agreement. 7.4 Indemnification. Subject to the limitation set forth in Section 768.28, Fla. Stat., the Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless FPL, its parent, subsidiaries or affiliates and their respective officers, directors and employees (collectively "FPL Entities") from and against any liabilities whatsoever, occasioned wholly or in part by the negligence of the Applicant or its employees, for injury to or death of person(s) and property damage arising or resulting in connection with any activity associated with work or service under this Agreement. 7.5 Insurance. If the Applicant utilizes its own personnel in the construction or maintenance work around the subject Facilities, the Applicant will cause FPL, its parent, subsidiaries and affiliates and their respective officers, directors and employees to be named as additional insured on the Applicant's General Liability policy for "bodily injury", "property damage", "personal injury" or "advertising injury" adsing out of the operations of the Named Insured. 7.6 Contractor Indemnification. The Applicant further agrees to include the following indemnification in all contracts between the Applicant and its general contractors who perform or are responsible for construction or maintenance work on or around the subject FPL Facilities: "The Contractor hereby agrees to release, indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the Applicant and FPL, its parent, subsidiaries, affiliates or their respective officers, directors, or employees, from all claims, demands, liabilities and suits whether or not due to or caused by negligence of the Applicant or FPL for bodily injuries or death to person(s) or damage to property resulting in connection with the performance of the described work by Contractor, its subcontractor, agents or employees. This indemnification shall extend up to but shall not exceed the sum of $1,000,000.00 for bodily injury or death of person(s) or property damage combined single limit and $3,000,000 occurrence aggregate. In the event the Contractor is insured for liability with limits in excess of these amounts, Contractor's said obligation shall extend up to but shall not exceed the limits of that insurance. Contractor's costs of defending Applicant and FPL, including attorneys' fees are excluded from and are in addition to the aforesaid limitation of liability for injury, death and property damage." 0 9 2002 page 4 of 6 Governmental Facilities Relocation Agreement (rev. 2/8/00) 7.7 Contractor Insurance and Notice. The Applicant agrees to require its contractors to obtain insurance to cover the above indemnity and further agrees to verify with its contractors that such insurance is in full force and effect. The Applicant shall provide FPL Group Inc.'s Risk Management Department with notice of the name and address of Applicant's contractors as specified in section 7.6 above, prior to the commencement of the Relocation of FPL Facilities by FPL. 7.8 Modification or Termination of Aqreement. This Agreement may be modified, amended, or terminated at any time by written agreement of the Parties authorized and executed with the same formality as this Agreement. FPL's Underground Facilities Distribution Conversion Agreement, if attached hereto, is approved by the Florida Public Service Commission and may not be modified or amended by the Parties. 7.9 Effect of Headinqs. The headings set forth herein are for convenience only and shall not be deemed to modify or affect the rights and obligations of the Parties to this Agreement. 7.10 FPL Consent to Relocations. FPL agrees to the Relocation of the FPL Facilities to the extent necessary to eliminate Conflicts with the Applicant's construction in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Applicant shall make all necessary arrangements and agreements with any person or entity which has facilities attached to the FPL poles for the Relocation of those facilities at no expense to FPL. 7.11 Deleqation of Power and Duties and Notice. The following persons are designated as the authorized representatives of the Parties for the purposes of this Agreement and all notices or other communications to either Party by the other sha!! be made in writing and addressed as fo!lows: To the Applicant: Dale A. Bathon, P.E., Principal Proiect Manaqer (Name and Title) Transportation Enqineerin.q & Construction Manaqement Department 2675 South Horseshoe Dr., Suite 401 Naples. FL 34104 With Copies to: For FPL: 7.12 Force Maieure. Eduardo Garcia Transmission Relocation Coordinator FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY P.O. BOX 14000, (TLE-JB) Juno Beach, Florida 33408 (a) Neither Party shall be liable or responsible for any delay in the performance of, or the ability to perform, any duty or obligation required by this Agreement in the event of a force majeure occurrence. Such occurrence shall include, but shall not be limited to acts of civil or military authority (including courts or administrative agencies), acts of God, war, dot, or insurrection, inability to obtain required permits or licenses, blockades, embargoes, sabotage, epidemics, fires, unusually severe floods or weather, strikes, lockouts or other labor disputes or difficulties. The obligation of either Party to pay money in a timely manner is absolute and shall not be subject to the force majeure provisions. Force majeure as used herein means, without limitation, any cause or event not reasonably within the control of FPL or the Applicant. (b)In the event of any delay resulting from a force majeure circumstance, the time for performance hereunder shall be extended for a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of such delays. (c) In the event of any delay or nonperformance caused by a force majeure circumstance, the Party affected shall promptly notify the other in writing. 7.13 Severability. In the event that any of the provisions or portions or applications thereof of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the Applicant and FPL shall provisionsadjustment in the affected provisions of this Agreement. The validity and enforceability of the rershall not be affected. ,a iningb, iNo.. APR 0 9 2002 page 5 of 6 Governmental Facilities Relocation Agreement (rev. 2/8/00) 7.14 Effective Dat..__.__~e. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by the Parties and shall continue in effect until completion of all Relocation work by FPL unless otherwise provided herein or earlier termination in accordance with this Agreement. 7.15 Complete Aqreement.. This Agreement shall be signed by the authorized representatives of both Parties and constitutes the final wdtten expression of all the terms of the agreement between the Parties and is a complete and exclusive statement of those terms. Any and all prior or contemporaneous course of dealing, representations, promises, warranti~' or statements by the Parties or their agents, employees, or representatives that differ in any way from the terms of this written Agreement shall be given no force or effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Relocation Agreement, to be effective as of the date first above wdtten. APPLICANT: Board of County Commissioners For Collier County, Florida By: James N. Coletta Title: Chairman Date: Attest: fSea!) Tit!e FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY: By: Barbara Jaindl Title: Director Date: page 6 of 6 Governmental Facilities Relocation Agreement (rev. 2~8~00) This Estimate Valid through 0-'~--.~/02 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMP;uNY SUMF2%RY ESTIMATE OF COST FOR: COST ONLY ESTIMATE CONST/LIKE-LIKE EST. Relocate s~'ucture 138M5 & 138M6; Replace with SPC County Livingston Road, Phase IV, County Project No. 65041 REMOVALS : : INSTALL & MAINT. SALV CR RMV COST: ITEM : ITEM COST TOTAL : (A) ENGINEERING : : Labor : : Transportation & Misc Expenses : : Applied Engineering : : sub-Total : 12,878 12,878 : (B) LA~D & LAND RIGHTS (RT OF WAY) Labor Transportation & ~lisc Expenses Purchase and/or Easements Payment to Contractor Sub-Total (C) CONSTRUCTION 4,379 : 1,814 6, 193 : Labor : 43,312 : Transportation & Y~sc Expenses : 17, 935 : Material : 15,059 Payment to Contractor : Sub-Total : 76,306 : (D) OTHER MAINTENANCE : : : : Labor : 2,324 : Transportation & Misc Expenses : 963 : Material : : Payment to Contractor : : Sub-Total : 6,195 : TOTALS : : : 3,287 92,471 Recapitulation of Cost Estimate Total Installation and Transfer Cost Removal Cost Salvage Credit $ SUBTOTAL Less Credit Ratio of 0.00% Net Replacement Cost : 92,471 : 6,195 :( ; : : ( : 98, 666 98, 666 * ~and!ing, Tax & Ins and Pension & Welfare at Approved Rates. #877 REV 3/94B Eh.. ar kl (~ ~' LI~.~' ~ ~ ]],'~ I ~ Submitted by ~C.//~..'~o ~-~//~C//1 AS E ~.~,~A.(,,TEI~_. APR 0 9 2002 %o X Z ~LLI~_.R-O~NGE ~.I\~R #% 230 APLES i ~¢_.,k\; [005]-'-- L'- ""~~,,~ -co, ) LLIER.-OR,'~N GE R~ __ CO-NA. PLES/,SSkv [005}-------'+-~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AWARD WORK ORDER NO. NTI-FT-02-02 IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000 TO NATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR THE GORDON RIVER CLEANOUT PROJECT//31005. OBJECTIVE: To receive Board approval and award of a Work Order for the Gordon River Cleanout Project to Native Technologies Inc. in accordance with the Annual Contract for Countywide Exotic Vegetation Removal, Contract No. 00-3125. CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Stormwater Management Department has been concerned for the last several years about the restriction to the normal flow of stormwater in the 2,800-foot section of the Gordon River south of Golden Gate Parkway between Goodlette-Frank Road and Airport-Pulling Road. Recent reconnaissance by canoe revealed a severely congested flowway cross-section due to bloxvn down mangroves and a severe infestation of Brazilian Pepper trees. The purpose of this project is to restore the normal flow capacity to this section of the Gordon River by removing the tangled web of native and exotic vegetation lying in, on and over the water surface. The project is o~anized into two (2) phases. Phase 1 is divided into two (2) tasks. Task 1 will consist of cutting back tree limbs and trunks from a small barge working within the existing Gordon River channel. Task I will also include collecting and loading all of the cut material onto a second barge. Task 2 of Phase 1 consists of transporting all cut material to a designated offloading area where it will be hauled away for disposal. Completion of Phase 1 will establish a clear path on the water surface and develop the necessary vertical clearance in the canopy allowing passage of the small barges required to complete Phase 2. Phase 2 includes removal of the Brazilian Pepper trees growing landward of the top of bank up to a maximum distance of fifteen (15) feet inland. We have received the cooperation of the Big Cypress Basin ! South Florida Water Management District in the use of their specialized equipment and personnel to complete Task 1 of Phase 1 at no cost to Collier County. To complete the project, Task 2 of Phase 1 and all of Phase 2, we have received three (3) quotes from firms under the "Annual Contract for Countywide Exotic Vegetation Removal." These quotes include a line item for an alternate method for completion of Phase 2. This alternate consists of killing the Brazilian Pepper trees in place with herbicides with no removal allowing the dead trees to decompose over time. AGEN.r?tA No. 2415 ,,. APR B Y 2002 pg. Executive Summary Gordon River Cleanout Proiect Page 2 of 3 Summary of Quotes ~r Native Technologies Ecosystem Technologies Florida Environnlental No' Work ~. ' I. Task 2 of Phase I $28,951.00 $20,631.00 $305,500.00 2. Phase 2 $41,717.00 $58,11 l.O0 $165,050.00 3. Subtotal $70,668.00 $78,742.00 $470,550.00 Phase 2 Alternate - "Kill $8,840.00 $18,000.00 $14,750.00 4. in Place" Professional Mangrove $284.34 $700.00 S 1,500.00 5. Trimmer-Cost per Da,',' Although this Phase 2 alternate method represents a significant cost savings (row 4 versus row 2 of above "Summary of Quotes" table), it is not recommended. The substantial clutter of remaining dead exotic trees would take years to decay and could wash into the River. A Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Mangrove Trimming Pe~Tnit is required for this project. Our Department is in the process of securing this Permit and it should be issued mid-April. Permitting requirements stipulate that a Professional Mangrove Trimmer must supervise all mangrove trimming. We have solicited quotes for this service on a per day basis. (Refer to row 5 of the above table.) Mangrove trimming is necessary during Phase I only. An amount of $9,332 is included in the Work Order to cover unexpected contingencies and the estimated expense of having a Professional Mangrove Trimmer on-site. Phase I is estimated to take 2 to 3 weeks to complete. Phase 2 will begin immediately following Phase 1 with thirty (30) days to substantial completion and ninety (90) days to final completion including a two (2) month mortality evaluation period. This project will be completed in the dry season prior to June 15th while River flows are minimal. This critical channel clearing project was not anticipated in the FY 01/02 Budget. It is now apparent that an emergency exists to have this severely congested waterway improved before the next rainy season in order to minimize the ever increasing flooding condition that exists upstream of the Golden Gate Parkway. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $80,000 are available in the Water Management CIP Fund within the Gordon River Basin Planning Project. Source of Funds are Ad Valorem Taxes. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. AGENDA ITE~ No. /(, ~ k,[_ APR - 9 2002 Pg. ~- Executive Summary Gordon River Cleanout Project Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: (1) Award Work Order No. NTI-FT-02-02 to Native Technologies Inc., in the bid amount of $70,668 plus Professional Mangrove Trimming services on a time and materials basis of $284.34 / day with the total Work Order amount including contingencies not to exceed $80,000.00. (2) Direct the Board Chairman to execute Work Order No. NTI-FT-02-02 with Native Technologies Inc. Gerald N. Kurtz, En=in~er Stormwater Management Department Date: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: Joti~ H. Boldt, P.E., P.S.M., Director Stormwater Management Department / ~ No~Tnan Feder, A,C.I.P., Administrator Transportation Division Date: '3'- >/-o9" Date: Attachments: Work Order Native Technologies quote A ND& iTEM APR 0 9 2002 3 RECEIVED FEB - 5 2002 WORK ORDER # NTI-F'F-02-02 Agreement for County Wide Exotic Vegetation Removal l)ated November 28, 2000 (Contract #00-3125) This Work Order is for exotic vegetation removal work known as: The Gordon River Cleanout Project The work is specified in the proposal dated December 18, 2001.. which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In accordance wi:h the Terms 'and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above. Work Order # NTI-FT-02-02 is assigned to: Native Technoloeies Inc. Scope of Work: See attached proposal. Schedule of Work: Phase I is estimated to take two (2) x~>~-~'x~-&kw, eeks to complete. Phase 2 will begin immediately following Phase 1 with thirty (30) days to substantial completion and ninety (90~ days to final completion including a two (2) month mortality evaluation period. Compensation: In accordance ~itb Section 3 of the annual contract, the Count)' v, ill compensate the Firm in accordance 9. ith the negotiated lump sum and lime and material costs of: Lump Sun]: Task 2 of Phase 1 S28.951.00 Phase 2 $41.717.00 Subtotal 570,668.00 Time and Materials: Professional .Mangroxe Trimmer $285.34 per day Total Work Order Amount Including Contingencies Not to Exceed $80,000.00 Any change within monetary authority of this Work Order made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged according to Section 3 of the annual contract. PREPARED BY: AUTHORIZED BY: AUTHORIZED BY: Gerald N. Kurtz, E.I. Engineer, Stormwater Management Department John;H. Boldt. P.E., P.S.M. Director. Stormwater Manavement Department Norman Feder,'.Kdministrator Transportation DMsion Date Date / Date Approved as to Form and Legal_...~Su fficienc~ ~ Assistant'County A~tt6rney J ACCEPTED BY: Native Technoloeies, Inc Lewis J. Lautin, President Prinl or Type Name and Title Date F:~IS Word Files Stormv,'ater',Gordon River Cleanout\W.rk Order GRE Exotic Remc, val.doc AGENDA LT{EM No. % APR O 9 2002 Native Technolo~e~ Inc:~ DEC 19 ~I I0:q9 COPY 3215 NW 10th Terrace, Suite 209 Fort Lauderdale, Florida ~ 9 Phone 954.523.5236 · 888.301.,, 07 Fax 954.462.7011 www. nativetechnologiesinc.com Quotation Prepared For: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Stormwater Management Dept. For GORDON RIVER CHANNEL CLEANUP Contractors Under Annual Contract No. 00-3125 Annual Contract for Countywide Exotic Vegetation Removal AGE~ND/~ I.TI~M APR 0 § 2002 Deadline for Quote Submission: December 19, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. State Certificate # CB-C038946 Printed on recycied paper .... ..,, , ~, . =, ,.., ,d., .=, ~.,=o, ,u~ - r~uv,:~u~ L.,ecemt3er 12, 2001 CONTRACT PROPOSAL Page 8 of 9 ADDENDUM ir3 FROM: Native Technologies, Inc. II ! ! ! hUE: December 19, 2001 @ 4:00 p.m. Board of County Commissioners C/O Stormwater Management Department Suite 212, 2685 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: "Gordon River Channel Cleanup" Dear Commissioners: I I I I I I I I The undersigned, as vendor, hereby declares that he has examined the specifications and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the work to be done for furnishing all labor and equipment to perform complete maintenance of retention areas as per the attached specifications. The vendor further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that this Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or companies submitting a Proposal; and it is all respects fair and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The vendor proposes and agrees, if this Proposal is accepted, to contract with the County furnish work in full, in complete accordance with the attached specifications, according to the following unit prices: Task 2 of Phase I Phase 2 Professional Mangrove Trimmer Phase 2 Alternate - Kill in Place $... 28,951.00 Total Cost $ 41,717.00 Total Cost $ 284.34 _Cost Per Day $. 8,840.00 Total Cost Any discounts or terms must be shown on the Proposal Form. will be considered and computed in the tabulation of the bids. terms for less than 15 days payment be offered. Prompt Payment Terms: n/a % n/a Days; Net 30 Days Addenda received (if applicable): #112/6/01 #2 12/11/01~3..12/12/01 Proposal continued on next page .... Word Hies St~mw',ttc~Gordo~ River CIea. uou~u~ddcndum # 3_.rtl Such discounts, if any, In no instance should APR 0 9 2002 Gordon River Channel Cleanup - Noveml:~' 26, 2001 Page 9 of 9 PROPOSAL CONTINUED The service to ,be furnished by us is hereby declared conformance wztn the specifications of the County. The undersig ned do agree that should this Proposal be acc~ contract and present the same to the County Purchasing fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of the Contract. The undersigred do furtt~er agree that failure to execute and d contract within fifteen (15) days will result in damages to the County. IN WITNES Fi --OF, WE h,~ve hereunto subscribed our name~ of December 2001 in the County of Broward , in the Nativ~ Technologies, Inc. Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: Sole Proprietorship x ~ or P.A. Limited Partnership General Partnership Phone No. (954) 523-5236 FAX No (954) 462-7011 3215 NW 10 Terrace, Suite 209 Address ,.-- Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 BY: Lewis J. Lautin President ! ! and guaranteed to be in ! ! The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this . , in the State of ~'lorida. Title NOTE: If you choose to quote this project, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your proposal pages. day F:~MS W~I IMI~ Stormwater~-~don Riv~ Cleano~t~.FO_.rd' AGEND,~ ITeM APR 13 9 2002 Gordon River Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements INSURANCE TYPE X 1. Workers' Compensa~on X 3. .X 2. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 1985 I,S.O. form with no limiting endorsements. REQUIRED LIMITS Statutory UmJts of Flodda S~,tutes Chapter 440 and ail Federal Government Statutory Limits anti Requirements Bodily Injury & P..(operlv Damaqe $1.000.000 Single Umit Per Occurrence IndernnlficaMon: The Contractor/Vendor, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of, which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall ho~cl harmless and defend Collier County a.nd its agents and employees from all suits a~d actions, including attorney's fees and aU costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidentaJ to the perfcrmance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by an employee of the named Contractor/Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Con~ractor/Vendor's ol3Ugatlon uncler Bls provision sha~J not be limited in any way by the a~reec~ upon contract prfce as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/Vendor's limit of, or lack of, saff'~'ient insurance protection. The first Ten Dollars ($10.0(3) or money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. $500,000 Each-Gccurrence ~" Automot3ite Liability Owned/Non-owned/Hired Automobile Included _.X 5. Other Insurance as indicated below: a) United States Longshoreman's and Harborworker's Act coverage shall be maintained in the arr~unt of $1.000,000 b) Maritime Coverage (Jones Act) shall be maintained in the amount of c) Watercratt Uabllity coverage shall be carried in the amount of $1,000.000. AGENDA, ITE,M APR O H 2002 pg_ ~'~ Gordon Riv~ Channel C3eanup - ~ovamb~ 26, 2001 Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements (Continued) X Contractor shall insure that ail subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements lhat he is required to meet. The same contractor shall provide the County wilh certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. X X 7. Collier Count'./ must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the v/ Insurance CertiCK:ate for Commercial General Liability. 8. Collier County Board of County Commissi~ers shall be named as the ¢x' Certificate Holder. NOTF-' TI3e 'Cerli/icate He,er" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tam[ami Trail Naples. FL 34112 9. Thirty ($0) Days Cancellation Notice is requlrecl. ,.,,/ × 10. The Certificate must refer to contract titJe. BIDDER'S AND INSURANCE AGENT STATEMENT: We understand the insurance requirements ~nt~ined in these specifica~ons, aJ~d that the evidence of saJd insurance may be required wi'thin five (5) business days of the award of bid. Native Technologies, Inc. ~dder .......... $ig a~e of Bidde Insurance Agency $ig~ture of Bidder's Agent Lewis J. Lautin President AGENDA I~M APR 0 9 2002 TOT~',_ ;. 2t4 PRODUCER ADh Risk Services, Inc of Florida 1001 Brickell Bay Drive Suite 1100 Miami FL 33131 I'r~ONE -(._..~305) 372-9950 INSURED 200~ NATIVE TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 3215 N.W. 10th Terrace Ft. Lauderdale FL 333090000 USA :'.COVERAGES ·. FAX . (305) 372-1455 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A Transportation Insurance Co. COMPANY B Zenith Insurance Co COMPANy C COMPANY D THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE'BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAME~)ABOVE FOR THE ~"LIC"~ PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF AI'~ CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT ¥~ITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, TYPE OF INSUP.~,NC£ GENERAL UABIUTY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY __ CLAIMS MADE ~'~ OCCUR OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OW'NED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LL~BIL.FFY ANY AUTO EXCESS UABII. JTY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM FOLIC%'~II~R PO~IC%'£1rlr~c'/~'E 2054202082 ¢omme~al General LiabJlj~ 0g/12/01 09/12/02 2054202101 BusinessAuto 09/12/01 09/12/02 09112/02 01/01/02 2054202101 Umbrella 09/1 2/01 Z050469406 Workers Compensation 01/01/01 WORKER*S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILJTy 'THE PROPR IETORI PARTNIERS/F_X EC UT/YE OFF IC E~ S AR E: LIMITS GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG PERSONAL & ADv INJURY EACH OCCURRENCE FIRE DAMAGE(Any one tim) MEDE. XP (A~v or~ De.am) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT BODILy INJURy Per ~en~on) BODILY ~IJURY (Per ac~.~d®nt) PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGATE EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE EL EACH ACCIDENT EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMI' EL DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEI .=,uu~e no Der s additional insured on the general liability policy as respects to the Gordon River Channel Cleanup p ERTIFICATE HOLDER .. . , ..:: . Collier County Board of ~ounty Commissioners J301 East Tamiami Trail Naples FL 34112 USA $2,000,000 $2.000,0O0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000- $50,000 $5,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000- $1,000,000 $1,000,000 '* CANCELLAT10~ SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOI~[ DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION CATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANYWILL ENDEAVOR TO MAJL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY REPRESENTATIVES ~;~ ACORD'CORPORATION '1 H~lrl~r Irl~ntlfi~r- ' Aon Risk Service December 7, 2001 Amy Lautin Native Technologies Fax #954-462-7011 (1 page) Re: Gordon River Channel Cleanup Collier County Florida Dear Amy: Confimxing our telephone conversation of this afternoon, if you are awarded this project, you will be using your aixboat and not any other vessel. The airboat, as you know, is now insured (for liability) under Southwest Florida Wetland's general liability policy. Since this boat is only being used to transport your employees, the carrier agreed to add it to Southwest Florida Wetlands general liability policy. The Watercraft Liability policy is needed only if you axe transporting other third parties. Please contract me if you have any other questions concerning this matter. Sincerely, . Soaia Paneque Account Executive I AGENDAITEM pg. t.t I001 ~rlck.l! Bay Driv. · Salt. I 100 · Mi~n;, ~lur,.~. 3 ½ t3 ! TDT~_ P. 01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE TOURISM AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NAPLES FOR MONITORING OF THE SOUTH GORDON DRIVE T-GROIN, $48,000 ~ To obtain approval of a Tourism Agreement to enable reimbursement to the City of Naples for South Gordon Drive T-Groin Monitoring. CONSIDERATIONS: The Tourist Development Council (TDC) approved a Grant Application for South Gordon Drive T-Groin Monitoring. (The now defunct Beach Renourishment Committee recommended approval) FISCAL IMPACT: On June 13, 2000 the BCC approved the FY01 TDC Category "A" projects (agenda item 8.A. 10) which include the grant application covered by this City of Naples Tourism Agreement. Funds in the amount of $80,900.00 have been appropriated and are available to reimburse the City of Naples in project # 10261. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: related to this action. There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Tourism Agreement xvith the City of Naples for South Gordon Drive T-Groin Monitoring and that the Chairman be authorized to execute the Agreement. Ron Hovell, P.E., Coastal Projects Manager / Public Utilities Engineering Department Roy B..Anderson, P.E., Director Public Utilities Engineering Department APPROVED BY: ;~~~ Thomas G. Wides, Interim Administrator Public Utilities Division APR 0 9 2002 / PG. - 2002 TOURISM AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE CITY OF NAPLES REGARDING MONITORING OF THE SOUTH GORDON DRIVE T-GROIN INSTALLATION THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this day of .2002, by and between the City of Naples, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY." RECITALS: \VHEREAS, COUNTY has adopted a Tourist Development Plan (hereinafter referred to as "Plan") funded by proceeds from the Tourist Development Tax; and WHEREAS, Plan provides that certain of the revenues generated by the Tourist Development Tax are reserved for beach renourishment and pass maintenance projects within Collier County; and WHEREAS, GICANTEE has applied to the Tourist Development Tax Council and the Board of County Commissioners to use Tourist Development Tax funds for management of Gordon Pass, specifically for monitoring the South Gordon Drive T-Groin project; and \VHEREAS, COUNTY desires to fund the South Gordon Drive T-Groin monitoring project proposed by the GR~5.NTEE. NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND PREMISES PROVIDED HEREIN, AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, IT IS .X1UTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF WORK: GRANTEE prepared a detailed application and proposal outlining the pass maintenance project to be accomplished, along with a project budget, as pm~t of the grant application process, hereinafter referred to as "PROPOSAL," attached as Exhibit "A." GRANTEE shall provide the project activities outlined in the PROPOSAL within the budgeted amounts provided in the PROPOSAL. GRANTEE shall not be reimbursed for any expenditures not included in the PROPOSAL nor be reimbursed for amounts in excess of those provided in the PROPOSAL unless an amendment to this Agreement is entered into by GRANTEE and COUNTY. 2. PAYMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT: The maximum reimbursement under this Agreement shall be Forty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($45,000). GRANTEE shall be paid in APR O 9 200Z PG. accordance with the fiscal procedures of COUNTY upon submittal of an invoice and upon verification that the services described in the invoice are completed or that goods have been received. GRANTEE shall determine that the goods and services have been properly provided, and shall submit invoices to the County Administrator or his designee. The County Administrator or his designee shalI determine that the invoice payments are authorized and the goods or services covered by' such invoice have been provided or performed in accordance with such authorization. The line item budget attached as Exhibit "A" shall constitute authorization of the expenditure described in the invoices provided that such expenditure is made in accordance with this Agreement. Each invoice submitted by GRANTEE shall be itemized in sufficient detail for audit thereof and shall be supported by copies of corresponding vendor invoices and proof of receipt of goods or performance of the services invoiced. GRANTEE shall certi~' in writing that all subcontractors and vendors have been paid for work and materials from previous payments received prior to receipt of any further payments. COL~TY shall not pay GR_~\NTEE until the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners pre-audits payment invoices in accordance with the law. GtL&NTEE shall be paid for its actual cost not to exceed the maximum amount budgeted pursuant to the attached Exhibit :'A". 3. ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES: Only eligible expenditures described in Section 1 will be paid by COUNTY. Any expenditures paid by COU~'NTY which are later deemed to be ineligible expenditures shall be repaid to COUNTY within 30 days of COUNTY's written request to repay said funds. COU.~TY may request repayment of funds for a period of up to one year after termination of this Agreement or any extension or renewal thereof. 4. INSURANCE: GRANTEE is required to submit a Certificate of Insurance naming Collier County, and its Board of County Commissioners and the Tourist Development Council as additionally insured. The certificate must be valid for the duration of this Agreement, and be issued by a company licensed in the State of Florida, and provide General Liability Insurance for no less than the following amounts: - " 0 BODILY INJURY LIABILITY $_~00,00 each claim per person - " 0 PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY $_~00,00 each claim per person 2 APR 0 9 PERSONAL INJURY LIABILITY - $300,000 each claim per person WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY - Statutory The Certificate of Insurance must be delivered to the County Administrator or his designee within ten days of execution of this Agreement by COUNTY. GRANTEE shall not commence activities that are to be funded pursuant to this Agreement until COUNTY has received the Certificate of Insurance. 5. CHOICE OF VENDORS AND FAIR DEALING: GRANTEE may select vendors or subcontractors to provide services as described in Section I. COUNTY shall not be responsible for paying vendors and shall not be involved in the selection of contractors or vendors. GRANTEE agrees to disclose any relationship between GtLANTEE and the subcontractors or vendor, including, but not limited to, similar or related employees, agents, officers, directors and/or shareholders. COUNTY may, in its discretion, object to the reasonableness of expenditures and require repayment if invoices have been paid under this Agreement for unreasonable expenditures. The reasonableness of the expenditures shall be based on industry standards. 6. INDEMNIFICATION: The GtLANTEE shall hold harmless and defend COb.~TY. and its agents and employees, from any and all suits and actions including attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against COL:~TY by any employee of the named GF%\NTEE, any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed or authorized to perform work by any of them. GRANTEE'S obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon Agreement price as shown in this Agreement or the GtLANTEE'S limit o£ or lack o£ sufficient insurance protection. 7. NOTICES: All notices from COUNTY to GRANTEE shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to GRANTEE at the following address: Jon C. Staiger, Ph.D., Natural Resources Manager City of Naples 735 8th Street South Naples, Florida 34102 APR,u,O 9 PG. All notices from GRANTEE to COLTNTY shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to COUNTY to: County Manager Second Floor, Administration Building 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 GRANTEE and COUNTY may change the above mailing addresses at any time upon giving the other party written notification pursuant to this Section. 8. NO PARTNERSHIP: Nothing herein contained shall be construed as creating a parmership between COL~'TY and GRANTEE, or its vendor or subcontractor, or to constitute GIL~.NTEE. or its vendor or subcontractor, as an agent or employee of COUNTY. 9. TERMINATION: COUNTY or GRANTEE may cancel this Agreement with or without cause by giving 30 days advance written notice of such termination pursuant to Section 8 and specit}'ing the effective date of termination. If COUNTY terminates this Agreement, COU~.~TY will pay GP,_~XNTEE for all expenditures incurred, or contractual obligations incurred with subcontractors and vendors, by GRANTEE up to the effective date of the termination so long as such expenses are eligible. 10. GENERAL ACCOU~'NTING: GtL4.NTEE is required to maintain complete and accurate accounting records and keep tourism funds in a separate checking account. All revenue related to the Agreement should be recorded, and all expenditures must be incurred within the term of this Agreement. 11. AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS: documents, papers, and financial information ,Agreement. GRANTEE agrees that COUNTY, GRANTEE shall maintain records, books. pertaining to work performed under this or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to, and the right to examine and photocopy any pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of GRANTEE involving transactions related to this Agreement. 12. PROHIBITION OF ASSIGNMENT: GRANTEE shall not assign, convey, or transfer in xvhole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the prior xvritten consent of the COUNTY. 4 .o. O 9 2002 mmm TERM: This agreement shall become effective on 01 February 2002 and shall 13. remain effective until 30 June 2002. 14. AMENDMENTS: This Agreement may only be the amended by mutual agreement of the parties and after recommendation by the Tourist Development Council. 15. This Agreement shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTEE and COUNTY have each respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. ATTEST: D\VIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORiDA BY: Jim Coletta. Chairman WITNESSES: GRANTEE CITY OF NAPLES (1) Printed. Typed Name (2) Printed/Typed Name B6nnie R. MacKenzie, Mayo~>~ (Corporate Seal) Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: ,~amir{j-Manalich I/ ' ssistant County Attorney JCS"~Wordata',T-Groin project',2002 retroactive monitoring tourism agreement revised.doc 5 App. roved as to form and legality City Attorney Exhibit "A" APR 0 9 2OO2 Humiston & Moore Engineers Invoice Summary Invoice Date Task Task Cost 11-Jul-01 A $11,622.75 (May) C $420.00 D $202.50 26-Jut-01 B S635.64 (June) C S240.00 D $1,582.85 12-Sep-01 B $12,971.41 (July) D S1,891.39 04-Oct-01 B $1,027.50 (August) D S577.65 29-N ov-01 B S987.19 (September) C S2,123.80 D S1,086.76 29-Nov-01 B S1,110.33 (October) C S240.00 D $232.50 31-Dec-01 B $6,166.80 (November) not yet rec'd. B* S4,038.13 (December) Total S47,157.20 lTask A - six month monitoring Task B one year monitoring Task C structure maintenance Task D meetings, presentations B' remaining balance !of Task B AGf~i I T~ APR 9 ZOOZ PC,. HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING November 17, 2000 Dr. Jori Staiger, Natural Resources Manager City of Naples 7'35 Eighth Street South Naples, FL 34102 Contract Amendment for Project Monitoring South Gordon Drive BeaChfront T-Groin Project HM File No. 9-062 5679 M'~Jx/D C,OuRT. uNiT, N.%= Cl_~. FLORIDA, ~4ll0 FAX: ~41 $~4 2025 PHONE: ~41 5F~4~ 2021 Sent via Facsimile Dear Jon, ,~,s a follow up to our resent discussion, we are providing you with this proposal to amend our contract for professional services to include the first year of monitoring and repofJng requirements associated with your State Department of Environmental Protection permit for the referenced Naples Erosion Control Project above.' The amounts are similar to as those submibed to you in April at the time you filed for TDC funding. A description of the proposed monitorina so,ices is provided below. We have provided an ~ amount. We have ==drooLed cost for each category as well as a total not to exceed structured this agreement in this manner at the direction of the City staff and wili be billing on a time and matedais basis in accordance with our attached fee schedule dated January 1, 2000. Scope of Work for Monitoring A. Six-Month Monitorina (Lump) Sum) 3. 4. 5. Beach and hydrographic survey, (23 offshore profiles, S10,840.00 14 wading depth) .................................................................... S4,230.00 Data reduction and analysis .................................................................... P, apor[ .................................................................................................... Compaction .................... : .................................................. : ..................... Coordination with adjacent property owners and their engineer ............. Subtotal for Task A: ............................................................................................ $7,6T0.00 $1,955.00 S2,242.00 S26,937.00 B. One-Year Monitofina (Lum:) Su'mJ 8. 9. 10. 'Beach and ~ydrographic survey, (23 offshore orofiies, 44 wading depth) ................................... ' ........................ $1 0,840.00 · ' .................... $4,230.00 Data reduction and analysis .................................................................... $7,670.00 Report .................................................................................................... Compaction ....................................................................... : ............... Coordination with adjacent property owners and their engineer ....... APR 0 9 I of 2 ' ' $26,937.00 Subtotal for Task B: ............................... - .................. ' ................ - C. Contingency Fill Placement (T&M) 11. Administration of fill placement, construction observation, wading depth surveys for $5850.00 -post fill and payment review, ................................................................... Subtotal for Tasks A throsgh C: .......................................................................... $59,724.00 Continaency, 10% for meetings with City, presentation to City or beach - · S5,980.00 committee, and DEP (T&M) .................................................................... Totat: ......................................................................................... · .......................... S85~ In our earlier~Correspondence in April we recommended'budgeting additional funding on the order of S27,170 for contingency fill placement on the downdfift shoreline and within the structures, if deemed necessary by permit conditions and monitoring results. We propose to ~rovide services under Tasks A and.B as lump sum and the remaining tasks as time anal materiats in accordance with the attached fee schedule dated Janua,W 1, 2000, included as part of this letter of agreement. Should services be requested which extend beyond the scope of services referenced above, such services will be provided as Additional Services in accordance with the referenced fee schedule and general conditions. The total costs presented above are summarized betow in engineering and surveying costs: Task =_ngineering Services Surveying Services Total A Sl 7,767.00 $9,300.00 $26,937.00 B $17,767.00 S9,300.00 S26,937.00 C $/-. 850.00 S1.000.00 S5.850.00 Subtotals: $74,176.00 S20,800.00 $59,724.00 S5.980.00 10% Contingency ~ Total: Should this agreement be acceptable, please indicate by signing below and returning one copy to our office, receipt of which shall constitute our Notice to Continue. As you know, we are anxious to mobilize our hydrographic surveyor to collect the 6-month monitoring data by the end of this month. Once you have had a chance to review this request, please give me a call. Sincerely yours, HUIVlISTO~E ENGINEERS Brett D. Moore, P.E. Attachments 2 of 2 HUMISTON & MOORE ENG'INEERS · NAPLES, FLORIDA AG£NDA IT£H APR 0 9 2OOZ PO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZE AMENDMENT TO CAMP DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC. GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000. OBJECTIVE: To amend the existing design contract to provide for conditional use rezoning of Golden Gate Wellfield xvell sites. CONSIDERATION: Five Tamiami Aquifer Golden Gate Reliability wells are at the 90% design stage; however, the Land Development Code requires conditional use rezoning on these essential service facilities. Redundant water supply is critical and the rezone effort will be undertaken on a parallel path with the bidding phase of the project. Consultant will also examine the zoning status and water quality issues for existing wells. FISCAL IMPACT. Source of funds is Water User Fees. Funds are available in project 70066. A budget amendment ;vill not be required until the bidding for the construction is complete. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact on growth management related to this project. These are reliability wells and the South Florida Water Management District consumptive use allocation will not be increased. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize amendment of the existing Golden Gate Wellfield Reliability design contract to provide for rezone services to Camp Dresser & McKee in the amount of $40,000. PREPARED BY: ~t;.----- 'o1 /y '..t..--._-~ '~_.Iarn~s L. McGee, P.E., Project Manager REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: Roy B./nderson, Director Engineering Department Thomas G. Wides, Interim Public Utilities Administrator DATE: DATE: WORK ORDER # CDM-FT-01-02 Amendment 1 Agreement for Fixed Term Utilities Engineering Services Dated April 10, 2001 (Contract #00-3119) This Work Order is for professional engineering services for work known as Golden Gate Wellfield Reliability Improvements The additional xvork is specified in the proposal dated March 20, 2002, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Order #CDM-FT-01-02 is assigned to Camp Dresser & McKee. Inc. Scope of Work: Task A - Task B - Task C - Task D - Task E- Task F - Task G - Design and Permitting Bidding Services Construction Administrative Services Operation and Start-up Services Additional Services Well Rezone Issues Water Quality Issues Schedule of Work: Complete work within 60 days from receipt of the Notice to Proceed authorizing start of xvork. Compensation: In accordance with Article Five of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the negotiated lump sum amount indicated in the schedule below (if a task is time and material, so indicate and use the established hourly rate(s) as enumerated in Schedule "A" of the Agreement). SERVICES Original Fee Amended Fee Type Tasks A through D $144,000 Task E $25,000 Task F $0 $30,000 Task G $0 $10,000 Subtotals $169,000 $40,000 Lump Sum T&M T&M T&M TOTAL FEE $ 209,000 Any change within monetary authority of this Work Order department approval will be considered an additional service Schedule "A" of the Agreement. PREPARED BY' ,/~-~;"'""" (,,~ L./McGee, P.E. Project Manager //Paul ~Vlattta~sch',-~at'er Dept. Director Roy/B. Anderson, P.E. PUED Director APPROVED BY' ~---~'~o Tl~omas G. Wides, Interim Utility Administrator ACCEPTED By: Thomas M. Missimer, Vice President made subsequent to final and charged according to Date Date Date APR 0 B 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AWARD BID #02-3351 TO PURCHASE ARTS AND CRAFT SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000. Objective: To award Bid #02-3351 to (2) vendors Triarco and S&S Worldwide for purchase of arts and craft supplies. Considerations: Bid #02-3351 was posted on February 21, 2002 with bid packages sent to twenty (20) vendors. Bids were opened on March 4, 2002 with six (6) bids received, per attached bid tabulation. Based on the variety of products and the discounts offered staff recommends award of bid #02-3351 to (2) vendors Triarco and S&S Worldwide. Triarco is the recommended vendor for the purchase of arts and craft supplies as the low bidder. S&S Worldwide is the recommended vendor for the purchase of arts and craft kits. There are no other vendors that supply arts and craft kits. The supplies purchased in this contract will be used in programs such as summer camp, pre-school, after school, and other recreation programs. Revenue received from programs registration will pay for the supplies purchased. The two recommended vendors offer a variety of art products useful to the needs of the Community Parks. Fiscal Impact: The Parks and Recreation Department expects to expend $40,000 for the 2001/2002 budget year. Funds have been budgeted in the appropriate cost centers. Growth Management: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners award Bid #02-3351 to Triarco and S&S Worldwide in the amount of $40,000 for purchase of arts and craft supplies. APR - 9 2002 Prepared by: Debbie Roberts, Operations Coordinator Department of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by: l fL¥./..,~,, [/~[d.: ,., '" 4 Marla Ramsey,'Di~'ecto{'- / Department of Parks and Ret: reation Date: Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Steve Camell, Director Department of Purchasing ~°~~:r~i;~} ~};;trat°r Date: 2- 21- ~' "~' Date: Agenda _Item APR O 9 Pg. Agenda _Item No ._L~/? \ APR 0 9 2002. _ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PARK IMPACT FEE WPDATE STUDY IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 Objective: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a budget amendment for the Parks Impact Fee Update Study to be performed by James Duncan and Associates, Inc. Consideration: Per the County's Impact Fee Ordinance, the Parks Impact Fee Ordinance is to be reviewed and updated at least every three years. The last Parks Impact Fee update was adopted in 1999. Through the Purchasing Department, requests for proposals were sent out for the update and James Duncan and Associates, Inc., was recommended for award. On March 15, 2002 contract 02-3317 with James Duncan and Associates, Inc., was executed through the Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Policy in the Amount of $23,380. A budget amendment is needed to appropriate funds from Impact Fee reserves for that contract. Growth Management: It is anticipated that the effort will result in amendments to the Parks Impact Fee Ordinance. This will allow the County to ensure it will meet the community's recreational needs in the future. Fiscal Impact: Budget amendments will transfer funds from Park Impact Fee Reserves in the amount of $25,000, into the Park Impact Fee Study Update Project. Use of Impact Fee funds are permitted for impact fee '"'*~.asibility studies. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board approve the budget amendments to transfer funds into the Park Impact Fee Study Update Project. Prepared by: . .:': -. ,' --"/ Date: James Fitzek, Operations Manager Department of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by: t t/~...,)~3t ~ 6~,/,..,~ .d/' Maria Ramsey, D~rec De >artment of Parks And,~Recreation Approved by: n Dunnuck, Administrator 4sion of Public Services Date: Date: APR - 9 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO RECOGNIZE REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $5810 FROM INSURANCE PROCEEDS TO REPLACE A STOLEN TRACTOR. Objective.: To obtain Board approval of a budget amendment to recognize revenue from equipment loss insurance proceeds. Consideration: A maintenance tractor was stolen from the Max Hasse Community Park. The insurance proceeds received from the claim total $5,810. The cost to replace the tractor exceeds the insurance proceeds due to equipment depreciation, however with other capital equipment funding in the cra'rent budget, the department will purchase replacement mowers. Since the theft occurred, a maintenance building has been built with the construction of the Louise Hasse Community Center. This should deter future thefts from this facility. Fiscal Impact: A budget amendment is needed to recognize revenue in Parks/MSTD Fund 111 - Equipment Loss Proceeds/Insurance and transfer funds to - Capital Other Machinery and Equipment:i.n t,he amount, of $5,810. Growth Management: None associated with this action. Recommendation: amendment. That the Board of County Commissioners approve the necessary budget Prepared by: (, .., i Sames F]tzek, Operanons Manager ~i Parks and Recreation Department Reviewed by: M~rla Ramsey~, Directo(/ Parks and Recreation Department Approved by: ~[,r~[ ~,[/~ /~,~ Jo~.~. Dun~uck, Admini"~trator Public Services Division Date: Date: BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST IFor Budge~]Finance Use Only B A#.... ~ .~.. ~.~,. ~ ....... JE# ................................. BAR# .............................. A.P.H. Date ....................... FUND TITLE MSTD General Fund FUND NO. 111 Date prepared: Attach Executive Surrm~ary BCC Agenda date Item No. /~ ~ ~ approved. 9t/q/O~''' EXPENSE BUDGET DETAIL IParks and other property Cost Center Title 156332 ,CostCentermo. II Project Title Project No. Expenditure Expenditure Increase Current Revised Object Code Title (Decrease) yludget Budget 764990 Other 5810 134,686 140,496 machinery and equipment TOTAL 5810 Cost Center Title {Cost Center No. I IProject Title I IProject No. Expenditure Object Code Expenditure Increase Title (Decrease) TOTAL Current BRue~i~:td Budget REVENUE BUDGET DETAIL Parks and other 156332 property Cost Center No. Project Title Project No. Cost Center Title Revenue Revenue Title Increase Current Revised Object Code (Decrease) Budget Budget 364420 Furn Fixt 5810 4}' ~&$'6, 15496 Equip F&F Equip Loss TOTAL 5810 EXPLANATION Why are funds needed? To replace a stolen tractor from Max Hasse Community Park. Where are funds available? Funds are available in Parks/MSTD fund 111- revenue from insurance for the stolen tractor. REVIEW PROCESS Cost Center Director: Division Administrator: Budget Department:ass Agency Manager: Finance Department: Clerk of Board Admin.: Input by: B.A. No.: DATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO RESCIND AWARD TO ASTOR CHEMICAL CO. FOR POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE FOR INABILITY TO FULFILL CONTRACT AND AWARD TO CARUS CHEMICAL COMPANY ON BID #01-3288 - "CHEMICALS FOR UTILITIES" IN THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF $107,205. OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio, the Governing Board of the County Water/Sewer District, rescind the award of potassium permanganate to Astor Chemical Co. and award to Carus Chemical Company. on Bid #01-3288 - "Chemicals for Utilities" in order for the County to continue chemical treatment of water. CONSIDERATION: On December 11, 2001, the Board awarded Bid 01-3288 -"Chemicals for Utilities" to various vendors. Astor Chemical Co. was awarded the contract for potassium permanganate which is used by the South County Regional Water Treatment Facility. On March 21, 2002, the County received a fax message from Astor Chemical advising that they were unable to supply potassium permanganate in the packaging required by the contract, and asked to be relieved from the contract. The second low bidder for potassium permanganate was Cams Chemical Company and theY have agreed to hold their bid price through October 31, 2002. Staff recdmmends that the Board rescind the award of potassium permanganate to Astor Chemical Co. pursuant to its request and award a contract for the chemical to Cams Chemical Co. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: These purchases are necessary in order for the County to operate its treatment facility and provide water service to the County's existing customers, as well as for future growth. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of awarding this bid is in the estimated amount of $107,205. Funds are budgeted and approved in the Collier County Water/Sewer District South County Regional Water Treatment Plant Fund 408, County Water/Sewer Operating. The fiscal impact represented in the following recommendation is based on estimated quantities listed in the bid information. These are only estimates_ I '\ used for bidding purposes and shall not be interpreted as the Board's authorized expenditure limits. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio, the Governing Board of the County Water Sewer District, rescind the award or potassium permanganate to Astor Chemical Co. and award a contract for potassium permanganage to Carus Chemical Co. on Bid #01-3288 - "Chemicals for Utilities". ~_.yn"M. Wood, Purchasing Agent REVIEWED BY: -~~' ~"1 cg.O~xi~Date' ~("/..2~fO"-L..- Steve Carnell, P~rchasing/GS Director APPROVED BY: ~7~'?c'~ Date: Jo-Anne Varcoe-Leamer, Administrative Services Administrator 03/21/2002 18:53 561-692-4633 T R WALTON TO: Lynn Wood. Purchasila~ Agent Collier Ceun~ ~axchasing D~t. Naples. Florida FAX/~ (339) 732-0§a4 ,,, DATE March21. 2002 FROM: T.R. WALTON ~ ASTOR CHE~I/CAL CO. [] EMCEE ENTE~SES 1874 BRITT ROAD N.W. STUART, FL 34994 AREA.CODE: (561) PHONE: 692-2212 · FAX: 692-4633 PAGE OF Subject: Potassium Perrnang~atc Ccr~rn~g our earlier conversation we regret ~at we are ,~able to fulfill our contact with Cot!let Co, unty to supply Potassium Pe,.'-mangm'mte for this :~.aeal year. At ~is fane our supplier is ~ab!e supply us with 150 kg drums and is only able to supply 25 kg packages, tn view of t,his we ask be relieved ~om our contract. Sincerely, 03/20/02 08:37 F.~ 815 224 6697 CARUS CHEMICAL ~00! March 19, 2002- Ms. Lynn Wood Purchasing Department Collier County Government 3301. East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Fax: ~9f732-0844 Re: Bid #01-3288 -"Chemicals for Utilities 2001" Dear Ms Wood: Carus Chemical Company; Division cf Carus Corporation will honor our bid pdce of.$1.305/Ib ($431.63 per 330.75 !b drum) for the above referenced CAIROX® potassium permanganate contract, under the same terms and conditions until October 31,2002. We at Carus Chemical Company value you as a customer and enjoy the ability to supply your needs. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 800/435-8856 ext 6535. 'Sincerely, Sandi Grubich Bid Manager SGIIk 0 9 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARy REQUEST BOARD APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,500 FOR A MEMBERSHIP IN PUBLIC TECHNOLOGY, INC. OBJECTIVE: To appropriate $6,500 fi.om General Fund Reserves to purchase a membership in Public Technology, Inc., a non-profit technology organization for all cities and counties in the United States. CONSIDERATIONS: PTI is the only national organization decicated to the purpose of improving the efficiency and effectiveness of all county technology resources. Public Technology, Inc. (PTI) is the non-profit technology organization for all cities and counties in the United States. The National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, the International City/County Management Association, and three primary local government associations provide PTI with its policy direction, while a select group of city and county members conduct applied R&D and technology transfer functions. PTI will offer the County a unique public/private forum of like-minded agencies and an opportunity to proactively share information and experience. Because technology changes so quickly, it is very difficult to keep up with emerging, cost effective methods of providing services. Typically, we depend upon technology suppliers for this information. PTI provides a network of users, like us, with whom we can share information. Their forums and task forces will provide the County with access to nationwide information tecnology resources which can be used to make investment decisions, share supplier references, and proactively avoid costly missteps. Various Collier County agencies are involved in large information technology investments, for example: Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Financial Management Systems (SAP), eGovemment, Community Development Software Systems, Traffic signalization and automation systems, electronic voting systems. The scope of the County's Information Technology infrastructure grows as more applications come on line. As these applications become a core part of the County's operations, the budget each year to maintain core infrastructure also grows. The County's membership would extend to all agencies of the County, all Constitutional Officers Organizations and all extensions of County Government (Cler, Sheriff, Tax Collector, Property Appraiser & Supervisor of Elections, Economic Development Council, Airport Authority). FISCAL IMPACT: A budget amendment will be required to appropriate $6,500 from General Fund Reserves to the Information Technology Department Administration cost center, 121152. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: resulting from this action. There is no Growth Management impact RECOMMENDATION: the membership to SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: That the Board approve the necessary budget amendment for Public Technology, Inc. '..' *¢ ~/// Date: .5 Bart-y H. Axelrod Direct~echn~fogy Date: ¢ -~--~ Jo-Anne Varcoe-Leamer Administrator/Administrative Services APPROVED BY: Date: APR 0 9 20~2 About PT! Pul:)lic Technology, Inc. (PTI), is the non-profit technology organization for all cities and counties in the Unitea States. The National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, and the International City/County Management Association, three primary local government associations, provide PTi with its policy direction, while a select group of acc c3umv memDers conduct applied R&D and .technology transfer functions. Created in 1971, PTI is the only national organization dedicated to furthering the use of technology in both cities and counties, for both elected officials and professional managers. Partnerships with private industry, an entrepreneurial spirit, and a focus on connectivity, sustainaDility, and wise decision support are the foundations of PTl's success. Other Ftorida jurisdictions that are current PTi members are: diliSDoroucn ~ount'.~. FL jac×sonviile. FL Miam, i-CaCe Count'..,' ~ ,cPCO. .-ine!las Count'/ F-= For a full list of current PTI members see attachment 1. Rationale for Collier County Membership in PTI The Coun~"s membership extends to all agencies of the County, all Constitutional Officer's Organizations and all extensions of County Government (Board of Education, Economic Development Council, Airport Authority, etc.). Various agencies of Collier County are involved in large, expensive, Information Technology Projects. Examples are; Geographic Information System, Financial Management System - SAP, Electronic Document Management System, Transportation Signalization System, eGovernment System, Electronic Voting Systems, on the list goes on. The sheer scope of the maintenance of the County's Information Technology infi-astructure will continue to grow as more applications come on line. PTI offers the County a unique public / private forum of like minded agencies and the opportunity to proactively share information and share experience. PTI's forums and task forces will provide the county with access to nationwide Information Technology resources which will be used to make investment decisions, share supplier references, and proactively avoid costly missteps. Reference Material Attachment 1 - List of Current PTI Member Jurisdictions Attahcment 2 - PTI Resource Information Pack APR - 8 2002 Attachment 1 Current List of PTI Members BirminGham. ~,L Dakota County. MN Mesa. AZ Phoemx. AZ Scottsdale. ,~Z Tucson. AZ Lakewood. CA Lone Beach. CA Oakland. CA Palo Alto. CA Sacramento. CA San Carios. CA San Dieco. CA San Francisco. CA San Jose. CA Santa Monica. CA Santa P,,osa. CA Sunnvvale. CA Aurora. CO Denver. CO Fort Collins. CO Wasmnqton. DC Broward Count,,'. FL Hiilsboroucn County, FL Jacksonville. FL Miami-Dade County Orlando. FL Pineilas County. FL Sarasom Coumv. FL Taitahassee. Ft. Savannah. GA Des Moines. IA Urbandaie. lA Lake County. IL tndianaootis/Marion Coumv. iN Johnson Counlv. KS Olathe. KS Overland Park. KS Sed.qwick County Wichita. KS Barnstable County. Boston, MA Gaithersburq, MD Montqomerv County. MD Rockwlle. MD Oak Park, Washtenavv County. MI Henneoin County. MN Saint Paul. MN Kansas City. MC) Sprinofield. MO Great Falls. MT (,2, harlotte. NC Durham. NC Greensooro. NC Guilford County, NC Winston-Salem, NC Lincoln. NE South Sioux City. NE Albuquerque. NM Clark County. NV North Las Veoas. NV Reno. NV Monroe County. NY Rochester. NY Cincinnati. OH Columbus. OH Dayton. OH ,Hamilton County. OH BroKen Arrow. OK Oklahoma City. OK E.Jcene. OreGon Portland. OR Phfiadelohia. PA Town of North Kinastown. RI Columbia. SC Memonis. TN Austin. TX Corpus Christi. TX Dallas. TX Fort Worth. TX Houston. TX San Antomo. TX Arlinqton County. VA Fairfax County. VA Hampton. VA Norfolk. VA Bellevue. WA Everett. WA Mercer Island. WA Seattle. WA Casoer. WY AGENDA I".,"..: ;.,~ APR - s 2002 P U B L I C T E C H N 0 L 0 G Y, ! N Who We Are PTI provides us an avenue to Ieam the best technical ideas and actions from cities and counties across the nation...One of the biggest advantages of membership is that some of the most progressive and successf,ai local government units in the nation work together sharing ideas and methods. ..Frank Fairbanks, Ciry 3,far~g~'r, ~!~'c, ,4 Z WHAT IS PTI? WHAT PTi CAN DO FOR YOU Public Technolo~', inc. (,PTi), is: · a unMye membersb_ip organization of innovative governments offering a wide range of technolo~, products and services; · a tec?molog7 think tank where technolo~,' experts and novices work together; · a national showcase of the technology innovations and achievements of local governments; · a center with g-uidance for),our tough problems; · an o~anization perfecdy positioned to join private industry initiatives with government's technology needs; and WHAT WE DO PTI was founded in 1971 to advance the use and development of technolo~- in local and state governments. Today, local governments of all sizes and structures join resources under the PTI umbrella to keep pace wkh rapidly changing technoloD,, share successes, and compete in a global market..~ we prepare for the 21st centui% PTI and its members are positioned to meet new challenges and capitalize on new opportunities. With PTI your local government is not alone. You have access to colleag-ues ready and willing to work together to solve ?'our problems. Whether the issue is telecommunications, transportation, energ2; public safer% or the environment, PTI experts are there to share. WORKING Access the best solutions, the latest information, and the newest technologies through a varien, o£ PTI media. Guidebooks. Based on the expertise and rea:-wond experience of members, PTi's guides, videos, and CD-ROMs cover a wide range of technolo~,-issues, including: Ho~; to · How to · How to manage technoloD' ds'ks; price local government information; create Enterprise-wide E- Government; How to use technology to relieve traffic congestion; and How to convert ?'our fleet to alternative fuels. PRISM, PTI's award-vdsming online member newsletter, covers technoloD' new~ and trends and is available at no charge. Training and technical assistance. \Vhether the bsue is energy conservation or selecting the best information s)~tems, learn more through PTi's: · Workshops and conferences; o PTI staff expert assistance; The PTi ANSWER Executive Information Service; . PTI's SW~&T peer-to-peer exchange program. F', ,._ ENpA iT[ M over to page 2 ,A/osn,ngror, DC 20004-1792 · 7e~ 202.~2C.2400 800.852.4934 · Fax 20202,372498 · hnp: /w,.-,w.~,l,.org TO BRING THE BENEFITS OF TECHNOLOGY TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS from page I Membenhip: the one-stop technology solution Intemet exchanges. The PTi web site at <hrtp://~-.pti.org > provides: Over 1,$C0 links to official local government sites; · A~q easy-to-use search engine; AMembers-Ontysection, including a news service and document archives; · Newsflashes, updated reb:mlarl~ · PTI ~ides and PRISM on-line; and Online forums. PTI members are e~gible to participate in active oniS.ne 15stserves, where they can obtain invaluable advice and "lessons Ieamed" from their peers. Technology transfer through peer exchange ~:rough task forces, advisor': boards, teclmolog7 testing and focus groups, PT:Fs members and ,, ' ~ keep pace v,4th aavances partners work to,etna, to ' in today's technoloD' and forge innovative solutions to tomorrow's challenges. Member research is furthering technology use in: E nergT=.,-, finding cleaner, cheaper energ?' alternatives To conser~'e one of _~krnerica's most precious resources; E nvirom'nental management and sustai,nable development, enabling local governments to improve public health, respond to federal mandates, and enhance community qualiw of llfe; Telecommunications and Information, harnessing the power of the Information Age for c o mlTlUnltles; Transportation, appl?~g intelligent transportation sx~stems to reduce traffic congestion and improve mobilk% and Public safer2; exploring new law enforcement tools to increase safety, and to reduce crime. With PTI, local governments are part of the solution. Membership in this unique organization ensures t~at your city or county, is part of the solution. With PTI, you stay on top of trends, challenges, and answers. :Attend a workshop. Join a task force or focus group· Or take advantage of PTi's unique SWAT peer-to-peer exchange program. Net~-orking with other members has proved to be one of the most valuable benefits to membership. Members have continuous access to the :X_NSWER Executive Information Service, technical assistance from staff and other memben, and PTI's rp~.ny publications-at no additional cost! And members achievements stax; in the spotngnt, through the national annual SOLUTIONS Technology Achievement Awards program, and in articles and books cking member technology SUCCeSSeS. To find out more about becoming a member or using your membership benefits full3.', e-mail: membership~ pfi.o~ or ca_l] the Membership Department at 1/8C0-852-4934. YOU AND PTI: A DYNAMIC TEAM Your participation is important. Share ?z)ur challenges, lessons learned, and success stories. Learn from the experiences of others. P~ic Teffmolog3; ]nc, is 'd~e n~Lvr~.~ ted..Moo~, and deu?toprrent ~ ~mnization oft he :¥arzbr~ L ~se of Cizses, t]oe /.N"ationa] A sscdation of C~.om~, and d2e I~omario~ C%/Cc~o~z), Ma~rro2t A ss~e&tio~ Updamd 2/2001 Public Technology, Inc. 1301 Pennsylvania Ave. NVv', 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20004 202/626-2400 Public Technology, Inc. 2OO1 - 2002 Research Program Public Technology, inc. (PTI) is the non-profit technology research, development and commercialization organization of the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties and the international City/County Management Association. The research function at PTI is accomplished primarily through the collective efforts of local o_overnment elected and professional practitioners who are appointed to task forces by PTI ~ember cities and counties. The PTI Board of Directors and the Urban Consortium Steerin~ Committee each vear establish priorities for conducting applied research that is essential for the development and introduction or technology applications in local ~overnments. PTI's three priorities for this year are in the areas of Wireless Technoiogies. ~_-Government. and Geo~aphic Information Systems (GIS). The research agenda is ~enerally segregated by subject matter (although there are crosscutting issues, such as GIS) ~nd is accomplished through collaborations by task force members and coordinated bi,: a PT! staff director. In many instances, PTI's industry partners are active participants in the collaborative effort. Each task force meets several times during the year and v~dth technology as the common platform, focuses on researching and conducting pilot demonstrations of technology innovations that benefit the nation's cities and counties. Based on the particular needs of local 2overnment, outcomes of this research may include guidebooks, xvhite papers, pilot and d~monstration projects, and training opportunities. PTI's standing task forces are Energy, Environment, Public Safety, Telecommunications and Int'ormation, and Transportation. Additional i¥ormation on the research agenda is available b)' contacting Robert Hicks. PTI Director Research and Strategic Initiatives. at 202/626-2465 or hicks@pti, org. APR-. PROGRAMS The objective of the Environmental Monitoring Project, a cooperative agreement between PTI and EPA's Office of Research and Development, is 'to build capacity within local eovernment to improve the use of environmental monitoring as a tool for enhancing ~nvironmental management and public health. The production of a guidebook drawn from various case studies will provide exposure to lessons learned, exposure to new ideas and ways of collecting and disseminating environmental information, and explore avenues of funding monitoring initiatives. Electronic Con-trnerce for Environmental Technologies (EC4ET) is a collaboration with the Center for Innovative Technology to begin construction of a portal site that will match the availability of enviromnental products with government procurement in Virginia. The goal is to have a £ullv functioning envirom:nental e-commerce portal running in eight months for Virmnia jtwis'dictions and environmental technology companies while better meeting the de'and of local jurisdictions and fostering domestic markets for environmental industries. Brownfields redevelopment, a crucial environmental, economic and community development issue, involves reclaiming fom~erly contaminated industrial/commercial land and buildings for new Uses. Brownfield sites are often in low-income, urban neighborhoods in need of revitalization. PTI, with support from EPA's Technology Innovation Office (TIO), has produced the Brownfieldstech.org Website and identi$~ case studies and demonstration ¢rojects to highlight assessment (site characterization) and remediation technologies and to disseminate this information nationwide to other jurisdictions. Throueh the production of publications, training sessions, and demonstration projects. PTI will provid~ a variety of environmental technology resources to local governments in support of their Global Climate Change protection activities. A half-day training workshop and a Climate Change Technology Tool Kit for local governments will provide education and training opportunities, guidebooks, best practices and lessons learned. The Distributed Energy Technologies project will address the role of local government in stimulating the use and the integration of distributed energy resources in local communities. The Urban Consortium Energy Task Force (UCETF) will be the principal investigator on this project. The UCETF will produce a guidebook on distributed generation and conduct peer-to- peer implementation assistance and educational workshops. As a sub-contractor to the Alliance to Save Energy for the Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency (MUNEE) project, PTI ~vill provide technology transfer to several Eastern European countries on effective energy management practices. PTI/UCETF xvill provide xvritten materials and conduct workshops on energy policy, planning and implementation of recommended energy efficiency measures tkrough ti'Lis initiative, ~vhich provides an opportunity to export the experiences and lessons learned xvhile conducting the Municipal Energy Management Program for 20 years. } ~.G~;',~i3,-- APR - The Rebuild America project represents multi-year collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and PTI. The UCETF will provide technical support to existing community partners for the Rebuild ,~rnerica program. This assistance will aid a larger audience of local governments in planning and carrying out viable energy efficiency management strategies and renewable energy applications within their communities. The U.S. EPA Energy Star project will identify and develop information on Energy Star Purchasing and/or energy efficiency equipment usually located in local governments, such as city hails, convention centers, schools, maintenance buildings and other goverrm'~ent co~nmerciat buildings. The results of a survey will help provide local governments with information to assist them in replacing existing equipment with products that are more energy efficient. At the conclusion of this project, EPA will be provided with best practices and reconm~endations on increasing energy efficient purchasing within local governments. The Transportation Svstems Operations and Management Program will facilitate the linkaee bev, veen the fe~leral transportation systems operations and management research, r~lann~no_, testing and implementation activities and the needs and experiences of the local and reeional o_ovemmems. Projects of the program include the development of a o_uidance document on performance measures for local government, an online needs assessment, ~uidebook on arterial management, case study on managing special events, focus gToup{ S) and white paper(s) to address the different issues relevant to local governments. The Wireless Communications Research Project seeks to develop business models, initiate pilot testing, share lessons learned and discuss rights of way issues and applications. The obiectiYe is to study the impact of existing and potential uses of ~vireless teclmology. This project will involve the participation of each task force within the Urban Consortium. A white paper and information on the PTI Website will help cities and counties improve service delivery tlu:ough the use of this emerging tectmology. Another outcome is to assess the potential feasibility of this technology by conducting pilot tests in cities and counties throughout the United States. The CAD/RMS/Vqireless Connectivity project will address issues related to the integ-ration and interoperability of public safety information systems. There is a critical need to investigate these two issues with a focus on Computer Aided Dispatch (C:,Xfl)). Barriers preventing the connectivity between these systems will be a key element of the research that will provide a set of recommendations addressing the tectmology and policy barriers with emphasis on available tecl'mology solutions. These recommendations will be disseminated to public safety agencies, the Office of Justice Programs and related organizations for possible adoption and implementation. White papers and other informational resources will be developed and disseminated for the purpose of educating a larger goup of local government officials on this issue. The Wireless 4Gov Program will research and develop ~vireless technology applications to educate local oovernments about wireless technology, xvhich will have an impact on many facets of local govem.ment operations and is cross cutting, i.e. public safety, environment, business operations, transportation, etc. Public/Private Collaborative of Integrated Justice Information Systems is a joint project between PTI and the Office of Justice Programs, Inte~ated Justice Industw Working Group, to develop, with the input of local government officials, a procurement/pre-RFP resource document. This document would be used as an education and training tool for local eovernments, and would be available in text form and online. The ultimate purpose of this {project is to jointly develop solutions to the problems and barriers that impede the successful procurement of public safety information systems. Successful implementation of Kno~vledge Management Education and Tools requires the development of Web-centric tools that will enable local governments to share best practices within the context ofknoxvledge management. These decision-support tools will alloxv all local eovernments - practitioner and elected and top appointed officials - to benefit from lessons ~earned through enhanced management practices and capabilities. The same holds true for the Decision-Support Management Tools and the E-Government Education and Tools. ,A national series of E-Government Seminars will help educate local governments about e- government, the various e-applications and potential benefits including cost-saving solutions. GASB issued a new accounting standard for state and local governments in June 1999 to bring extensive changes to o_overnmental accounting practices, asset management and the maintenance of local ~ovemment infrastructure. This project is intended to educate local o_overnment officials ;bout the GASB-34 re~tlations and the potential effect these new ~randards will have on local o_ovemment operations. The pro,am also offers technology solutions to assist local __.ove~nent meet these GASB-34 requirements xvhile raising awareness among electe~l and appointed local government officials concerning GASB-34 and its potential impact on government funding. Additional information on task force initiatives is available by contacting: Sharron Brown Director, Energy Progams 202/'626-2428 sbrown~_~,pti.org Janet Quist Director, Public Safety Programs 202/626-2414 quist@pti.org Ronda Mosley-Rovi Director, Environmental Progams 202/626-2455 mosley-rovi~_~pti.org Robert Hicks Director, Transportation Progams 202/626-2465 hicks~pti.org Donald Evans Director, Telecommunications and Information 202/626-2432 evans~pti.org Public Technology, Inc. 1301 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 8'h Floor \~:ashington. D.C. 20004.0./6~6-.400 ~vw~.pti.org PUBLIC TECHNOLOGY, INC. Web Managers' Forum MISSION A municipal Web site is an /mportant part of a local government's effort to deliver services to customer-_ Recog-nizing the variety and amount of resources local govenuments are invesLn~ in their presence on the Web, and that there are Web-related issues unique to local zovt:-r~xents. PTI created the Web Managers' Forum. ~ne Web Managers' F · Facilitates and prcr.~tt¥ infon, ation-sharing and provides problem solving soiuticns among Web mana_z:-:~ · Serves as a naticnal ::'_::.nation source on local govern_ment Web issues. The Web Manager: ~::-L~n: works ctosetv with the PTi Urban Conso~iurn Telecommunications ~:-2 .:x-orrnation Task Force. This task force consists of the sen~or- level officials in nation's largest cines THREE PILLARS F.3 i,. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT PTI has identified "::;:':, ::5iars" for loc~ governments to consider when deveiopmg municipal Web sRes _::-.5 electronic government applications. PTi believes tha~ a municipal Web site sh · Promote democra.: · Encourage econo, n::: aaUvity; Enhance the deiive:'v ef services '~o citizens. PTI promotes these zma¢Eines via the PTI Web site, articles and at presemaz/ons at national conferences. LOC,aL GOVERNM£YT WEB SITE SERIES ISSITE BRIEFS New in 2001 is a set:s:- :.f issue briefs on web-related topics. These issue briefs local government pcH:: s~. erocedures and docmnenls. Issne brief titles include: · "Privacy Statemen:~ :or Web Si~es" · "Links and AdveTL~ e',:zem Pohcies for'Web Si~es" · "Web Site APR laublJc Technoiog}. i;. 7. i30t PennsyJv~ Ave. ~'. WEB FORUM 2001 The annual meeting of member web managers took place on .april 18,200i m Atlanta, Georgia. Web Forum 2001 included "best practice" presentations b.y local government officials, roundtable discussions on hot topics and net-working. Over 130 local officials and industry representatives attended the Forum. WEB MANAGERS LISTSERVE Web managers in PTI member cities and counties participate in an electronic mail listserve. This listserve allows for the posting of quer/es and responses, and im%rmaticn updates on local government Web issues. Recent discussion topics on the listserve include: · "Branding" web sites (common look with loges/banners for ail pages): · Accessibility bypersons with disabilities; · Online chat features for residents to communicate with elected officials: · Domain naming schemes and .gov extensions: · Planning for and implementing Website redesigns; · Budgeting/Expenditures for developing Web applications; · Developing an E-Goverrnment strate? or master plan; · Links policies; · Developing electronic transaction (parking ticke: pa.wnent, tax applications; · Advertising on local government Web sites: · Implementing audio and video applications; · Guidelines for municipal Web site design. payment) FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Bowen. Director of Online Services 202-626-2456 bowenfa~ti.nw.dc.us ABOUT PTI The mission of Pubtic Technology, inc. (PTI) is to bring the benefits of technology to local governments. PT/is the non-profit technolo~y organization for all cities and count/es in the United States. The National League of Cities, the National Associat/on of Counties, and the International City/County Management .4zsociation, the three primary local government associations, provide PTI with its pohcy direction, while a select group of cky and r,l'-i rm q~ counU' members conduct apphed R&D and technology [ :,~*'~="~r' i'~ :.:, Visit the PTI Web site at pti.org AP[ - S 2002 Public Technoto~'. Inc. 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., ..N"W, Washington, DC 20004 ww'~'.pti.org P U B L I C T E C H N 0 L 0 G Y, i 14 C . Telecommunications and Information Technology Task Force MISSION The Telecommunications ~'-: ,nformation Task Force (TtTF) is composed of leading-edge ClOs and Telecommunications Z~e:tors from across the nation. These creative-thinkers bring a broad range of experiences and ';{:~: :o bear in addressing key technology topics such as: e- government, knowledoe * :~e.,-nent and smart growth through the use of telecommunications The task force has bee:-, ' ...... .ental in identifying and responding to emerging technology issues sometimes before the rn~- ;..:e recognizes that an opportunity or challenge may exist. For example, the first two loc ::-nments to establish a web site in 1994 are longstanding members of this innovative consc"- Dianah Neff. Task Forc~ committed to heighten~~ knowledge to solve rex ~r-ares. "The Telecommunications and information Task Force is -ef?,s of technology in iocal government by applying member :ai ,ssues through collaboration, research and partnerships' ACCOMPLISHMENTS. The task forces recen:: · ems include: · Developec tocai gover- goals. · Conducted managem · Examined "For What tnformatic' ruitment and Hirinq Issue Brief to address the challenges faced by securing the top-notch [T talent needed 'to accomplish their 2K&You Educational Camoaign to alert elected officials and ,m~iications of Y2K and how to successfully overt disaster. ~ 9overnments can effectively value data and created a guidebook ,'th: A Guide to Valuing and Pricing Local Government PROGRAMS The Tetecommunica~cr plan for the coming yea: E-govemtrmnt-(Chair~ governments are piann' : online-service deiiveE~' ~ ~'ennsvivamc Avert ue '?q ¢',,' WORKING TO BR[k ~nformation Task Force and its three committees wili shape the work e :,ommittees encompass: _;za Lowery, S~ Frar~cisco, CA) examines the strategies local :: ~mptementing regarding e-g[:)vemment What does this shift to . ~ocal governments? How can CIOs stay ahead of the curve? APR - :'L4-;7C3 ·Tei 202.o2o2~00 800551 4q--34 · ~[ [~£NEI:ITS OF Ti:[HNOLOGY TO LOCAL GV~ Knowledge Management - (Chaired by David Moichany, Fair'fax County, VA) explores how Iocai govemments tap into "islands of information" including the web and e-government initiatives tc create an enterprise-wide knowledge base to effectively snare information internally and ex~ernaiiy. How does this principle tie into the overall IT strategic plan? Smart Growth - (Chaired by Lee Vandiver, Sunnyvale, CA) examines the role that telecommunications, including wireless, will play in the development of e-government and smart communities. How do organizations prepare for the future? What are the key components to be successful? How do we address the Digital DiviC~e? TASK FORCE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR Chair: Dianah Neff, Deputy City Manager/CIO, San Diego, CA Vice Chair: Sally Nagy, CIO, Sacramento. CA FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Donald V. Evans, CIC/'Task Force Director <evans@pti.org> Bobbi L. Arnold, Senior Manager, Telecom/IT <arnold@pti.org> TASK FORCE MEMBER JURISDICITONS Albuqueroue. NM Arlington County. .Atlanta. '"^ Aurora, CO Austin, TX Bellevue, WA Bos,on, MA Chicago, IL Cincinnati, OH. Clark County, NV Columbus, OH Dallas, TX Dayton, OH Denver, CO Des Moines, IA Durham. NC Faiffax County, VA Fort Worth, TX Gaithersburg, MD Greensbcrc. NC Hamilton County, OH Hampton. VA Hayward, CA Hennepin County. MN Hillsborough County. FL Houston. TX Jacksonville. FL Kansas Ci't'y, MO Mercer Island, WA Miami-Dade County, FL Monroe County: NY Monterey County. CA Montgomery County, MD New York City, NY Norfolk. VA North Kingstown, RI Oakland. CA Oklahoma City, OK Palo Alto, CA Phiiadeiphia. p.A. Phoenix, AZ Portland. OR Sacramento: C~,. Saint Paul. MN San Antonio. TX San Carios. "'* San Diego. San Francisco. CA San Jose. CA Sarasota County, FL Scottsdaie..,-,,_ Seattle, WA Spnngfieid. MO Sedgwick County, KS Sunnyvale, CA Tucson. AZ Washington, DC Wichita, KS Winston-Salem, NC P LI B L t C T E C H N O L 0 G Y, I bi ¢ . Transportation Task Force MISSION Local government officials joined to form the Urban Consortium Transportation Task Force in an effort to provide a voice for cities and counties on transportation issues and to research and exchange ideas to improve the quality of life, reduce traffic congestion and to improve economic development in their communities. The task force is currentlv focused on educating local elected and appointed officials and others on the bene- fits of intelligent transportation systems [iTS), sustain- able mobility, and other transportation applications of information technology. The mission of the PTI Urban Consort. lure Transportation Task Force (UCTrTF) is to: ~. Identify local government transportation technology issues, priorities and solutions; 2. Provide a leadership role and voice for local govern- ment to international, national and federal trans- portation decision makers; 3. Involve local governments ~m development of stan- dards and systems architecture for a nationally cam- patible intelligent transportation ~stem; 4. Conduct technology pilot testing within Urban Consortium jurisdictions; 5. Exchange information on technology, and innovative solutions to local government transportation prob- lerns. WHAT ARE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS [ITS)? Intelligent transportation systems use advanced com- munications, electronic, and information processing technologies to improve traffic management, traveler information, and public transit operations. Examples of ITS services are: · Automa~ced toll collec~on; · Commercial vehicle operations; ; 30] Cennsy~¥oma Avenue.4',lW' WOtlSING · Fleet management communications systems; · Automatic incident detection and emergency response; · Real-time traveler information for auto drivers and public transit users: · Advanced traffic management surveillance systems; · On-board route guidance and navigation devices: and · Collision-avoidance technologies. NEW AREAS OF RESEARCH Please contact Robert Hicks, Business Director, PTt Transportation Programs at 202/626-2465 or e-marl: hicks@pti.nw.dc.us, if your organization is interested in partnering with PTIOs Urban Consortium to conduct research or pilot testing in any of the following areas: ~' ITS and Law Enforcement/Public Safety Teclmnology · ITS and Environmental Monitoring · ITS Procurement Issues · National ITS Architecture · Intelligent Vehicle Initiative · Intelligent Infrastructure Initiative · [ITS and Welfare-to-Work · ITS and Sustainable Development · Transportation and Global Climate Change · Alternative Fueled and Electric Vehicles · LED for Traffic Signals and Variable Message Signs · Telecommuthng · GIS and Transportation Planning "Tit[ LOCAL GOVERNMENT ITS TASK FORCE PTI0s Urban Consortium Transportation Task Force identifies local government transportation technolo~ issues, priorities and solutions, and links local trans- portation officials with national and federal ITS deci- sion makers. The ~oup is composed of high-level trans- portation officials ~- ,,¢f-J,~ largest APR - ". Wasnm?on DC 20004-~793 · ~e~ 202.020 240C 80C, 852 ,~93z,[· ~a¢ 202_~2.=.2~¢cfi · ,nzr., ~vw~,.a~ otc TO ~RING 'THE J[NEEITS OF TECHNOLOGY TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS jurisdictions in the U.S., with partic- ipation from smaller cities and coun[ies. TASK FORCE MEMBER JURISDICTIONS: City of Albuquerque, NIvI City of ALlanta, GA City of Austin, TX City of Baltimore, MD City of Boston, MA City of Chicago, IL Clark County, NV City of Columbus, OH Delta County, MI City of Denver, CO City of Everett, WA City of Fort Worth, TX Hennepin County, MN City of Houston, TX Ci~ of Los Angeles County, CA Metro-Dade County, FL City of Milwaukee, Wi City of Monroe County, NY Montgomery County, MD City of New York, NY Orange County, FL City of Philadelphia, PA City of Phoenix, AZ City of Portland, OR City of San Antonio, TX City of San Diego, CA City of San Francisco, CA City of San Jose, CA City of Scottsdale, AZ City of Seattle, WA City of Tucson, AZ City of Washington, DC CHAIR: Doug Wiersig Director, Transportation Programs and Policy City of Houston, Texas FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Robert Hicks, Business Director Transportation Programs Public Technology, Inc. 1-800/852-4934 or 202/626-2465 E-mail: hicks@pti.nw.dc.us The Urban Consortium (UC) is a special network of the nation's largest cities and counties brought together by PTI to Fred solutions to their common concerns. Public Technology, Inc. is the non-profit research, development and commer- cialization arm of the national local government organizations of NLC (the National League of Cities), ICMA (International City/CounU' Management Association), and NACo (the National Association of Counties}. APi - 9 2002 P il B L I C T E C H N 0 L 0 G Y, i N C . II Environmental Task Force MISSION The Urban Consortium Environmental Task Force (UCEnvTF) of Public Technology, Inc. (PTI), was established in 1988. Its rniss:en ~s to apply technology-based solutions that promote superior enVironmental management. Supporting this mission, the UCEnvTF: Identifies key areas for research, development, and commercialization and develops appropriate public and Private sector pannersh~ps and structures to make these ideas realities; Acts as an urban labora:o'? helping PTI develop responsive tools and technolognes: and Guides and monitors PT7 - snx'~ronmental and commercializanon research pr~ects. BACKGROUND The UCEnvTF bnngs ex~er?:-.:t, s~lis, and strength to PTI's enVironmental program: Its membership cons]s:.- .:: c- :c'~ed officials, senior-level environmental managers, finance officmis and general admims~at;: ::'vm. c~ties and counties across the United States. Its collective experienc: -:'...:'.: research, development, demonstration, and commercialization o," environmental prO3ec~s :.:~ <apport better services to citizens. Through strong pos~t~o:-x:.~ :.:, the R&D technolo~, arm of its sponsonng organizations (NLC. NACo, and ICNL~_). ?Z_ ~::~ ',ts :ask forces can deliver solutions to thousands of jUrisdictions across the United States. GOALS The goals of the UCEnvT.; . ~. Improve delivery of en":r~,nmental goods and sermces to cinzens. UtilZZe enVZronmemal as.~e:~ ~o generate revenue and to rmnirmze costs. Identi$, and solve co~:x:~_~:' environmental problems, and to transfer innovative solutions to locat governments that need :::c:u.. Create sustainable pro;~, a::~s that balance local economic opportunities with environmental and quahty of life isslles: aT.c: Prevent, rather than co:7. cc:. ~nollution and other mavirormaental problems, when' economically feasible. 2000-200'1 PROJECTS Critical cnvirommental management issues arc ~ locus of UCEnvTF parmcrships and progra.mmazac activities. Current prO3 ects ,,venue **N v'v WORKING Environmental Momtor:::,': Working with EPA,. the UCEnvTt: is examining how cnvn'um~enlal data is collected and disseminated and how plarmmg technolog/es tike Geographic Information Systems (GIS) cazi play a role ~n ~?:~ronmcntal protection. Brownfield Redex'eioem eh:: The UCEnvTF, a/th EPA, is myesUgaUng innovatwe technologies used for site charac~e'nZanor and s~te remediataon on underutilized, often ccrntaminated industr/al s~tes. Enviro'nmenl. at Procurer:acne: The UCEnvTF is working with mdusI~' l~armer,~.~~o.~l~- Business Coalitions. and n2unicipal officials who pilot an en'nronmeh~t electronic' purc-l~mg ..... __ TO ItRiN : it. B[N£FITS Of: TI:CHNOI. OGY TO lOCAl information center. The center will demonstrate the efficacy for local governments using eiec~onic commerce to acquire environmental products and services. Global Climate Change: Through publications, training sessions and demonstration projects, the UCEnvTI: v~fill help local governments use environmental technolog3., to address climate change. Promotion of Water Iechnolo~mes: The UCEnvTF will explore technolo~, transfer and commercialization of water-related technologtes suited to local government needs. Exploration of parmerships with public and private organizations capable of stren~hening local government environmental management efforts. ACCOMPLISHMENTS Our environmental technology accomplishments Include the transfer of technology processes and techniques through guidebooks, focus ~oups, demonstration projects and conferences. They include: An electronic conference on alternative fueled vehicles: Mana~mng Asbestos-Containing Mater/al: A Manual for Local Governments; Sustainable Building Technical Ivlanual--reprinted in Chinese and Russian: Lessons Learned Recycling Handbook: A series of Sustainable Building Technology Conferences: Climate Change: Local Government Leadership Using Technoio~.'. Local Government Sustainable Buildings Guidebook: Environmentally Responsible Building Desig-n and Management: Comprehensive information exchanges on innovative approaches and technologies in soi~d was:e. water and air quality management between local governments and federal agencies: Landfill Methane Recovew and Utilization: A Handbook for Local Governments: Local Government Guide to Solid Waste Competitive Se~sce Deliver,'. A Y2K White Paper on the potential ~mpact of Y2K on environmental systems. TASK FORCE MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Albuquerque, NM Arlin~on CounD', VA Austin, TX Cincinnati, OH Clark County, Columbus. OH Dayton, OH City. and Count), of Denver, CO Durham, NC Fairfax County, VA Fort Worth, TX Gaithersburg, MD Greensboro, NC Hennepm CounD'. MIx' Kansas City, MO Lake County, IL Lincoln, Nq5 Long Beach, CA Miami-Dade CounD,. FL Monroe CounD:. Nh' Montgomery. CounD', MD New York, Nh' Norfolk, VA Town o£North Kmgsto~xm. R1 Philadelphia. PA Phoenix, AZ pmellas Counw, FL San Antonio, TX San Carlos~ CA San Diego, CA San Jose, CA Santa Monica. CA Scottsdale, AZ Seattle, WA Wichita,. KS Winston-Salem. N For more information, contact: Ronda Moslev-Rovi. Director APR ¢ 2002I P U B L i :: T E C H N 0 L 0 G Y, i N C . Envlronmentai Pro,ams Public Technology. Inc. 800/852-4934 or 202/626-2zz_i E-mail: mosley-rovir~!pti.nw.dc.us Doug Yoder, Task Force Chair Assistant Director, DERM Miami-Dade Count-3.,, Flor, da John Stuffiebean, Task Force Vice Chair Director, Env].ronmenta', Management Kansas Ci~, Missouri II The Urban Consortium i; 'i , ~s a network of cities and counties brought together by PTI to find solutions to their corn~m, '-:e~s through the use of technology. Public Technolo~', I_nc. ,,s the non-profit research, dexc; : :tnt and commermalization arm of the national local government orgamzations of N-LC 1:~ ', :.onal League of Cities), ICIVlA (intemanonal C]w/Countx.' Management Assocmt~c, NACo (the National Associanon of Counties L WORKIN~ TO BR!h i .~ 703 · 7e 2G2 BENEFITS O~ TECHNOLOGY TO LOCAL APR - S 20O2 GOVERN/~ENT$ P U B L I C T E C H N 0 L 0 G Y, i N C . Public Safety Task Force MISSION The Public Safety Task Force addresses the challen~ng issues facing cities and counties as they seek to use technological advancements for public safety purposes. The work of the Task Force assists local governments as the': work through the complexities ofpubiic safety technologies and applications and the sig-nificant public benefits attainable through the use of these technologies to solve local public safety problems. PROGRAM EMPHASIS Providing for the public's safety can be greatly enhanced through the use of advanced technology. Taking advantage of the complex ' 'and costly choices available requires knowledge and understanding of these technolo~es and their apphcations. It also requires a significant and justiftable financial mvestmem often beyond the resources of most local governments. A broad range of topics is currently under examination by Task Force members. These include critical planning and decision-making issues, information exchange and dissemination, and programs to facilitate the integration of justice information systems. The group is completing work on a local government guidebook to help facilitate the integration of justice information systems. Projects addressing crosscutting issues between PTI's UC Telecommunications and Information, Environment, and Transportation Task Forces are underway. These include a study of the potential benefits of inte~ahng public safety, transportation and other non-traditional public safety technologies, and' an internet-based guidebook on GIS/GPS. The task force is also working in the area of wireless communications interoperability/integration issues. The Task Force pursues these and other issues by meeting twice during the year. Reaching across all areas, the Public Safety Task Force is also working with technology industries to enhance their awareness of the unique requirements of local governments and by addressing issues which have been barriers to successful working relationships. Task Force members represent a full range of public safety disciplines including law enforcement, fire, emergency communications. courts, corrections, and local elected and appointed officials. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Tnom McCloud Public Technology. Inc. 800/852-4934 or 202/626-241 E-mail: mccloudCmpti.org Douglas Bartosh, Chief of Police, Scottsdale. AZ UC Public Safety Task Force Chair The Urban ConsOrnum (UC) is a special network of the nanon's largest cities and counties brough~ together by .PTI to find solutions to their common concerns. Public Technology, Inc. is the non-prof~ research, development a_nd commercialization arm of the national local government organizations ofNLC (the Nanonal League of Cities), ICMA (International City/County Management Association'}. and NACo (the National Associanon of Counties). ! APR - 9 2002 Pennsv~vomc Avenue'Nv'x,' Cvosnm?cr. DC 20004-792 · 7e. 2f.,2.02c.240~- 80C.~52.49 ~ ~l~l~l~c 2'~9~ ~'*nxz ,v,.v,., zr: a,r? WORKING TO BRING TH[ BENEFITS OF TECHNOLOGY TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS P U ii L I ¢ T E C H N 0 L 0 (3 ¥, i N C . II SWAT Team Program - Peer.Assistance What is a SWAT Team? A type of executive-on-loan program, SWAT teams provide strategic and technical guidance in support of the decision-making process. Comprised of experienced subject matter professionals from local governments of all sizes, SWAT Team members share their knowledge and make recommendations to other local governments based on their ox~m professional experience. A SWAT Team visit, usually of two to tkree da)n, is an efficient and extremely cost- effective method for addressing complex and cosdy local government issues using the experience of highly qualified local g_o. vernment managers. Through PTIs' association xt4th the most innovative local governments in the comau3.,', guidance can be provided in such areas as: · Pbnning and Implementing E-gov How Do SWAT Teams Work? Local governments face many similar problems. Why reinvent the wheel each time you establish a new program or explore new uses of technology? It makes sense to use the experience and hindsight of local government peers who have confronted a similar situation. sa,4ng time, money, and staff efforts. Local government colleagues are the best source of unbiased information on wha: works - not only have thevfaced similar problems, but they are aware of budget. dining, organizad~mal and political implications of decisions. Designed for speed and economy, SWAT Team visits are targeted for making recommendations in a pardc-b~ problem area. SWAT Tenrm can also act as adv/sory bodies to jurisdictions and/or their consultants for the duration of a long-term contract or project. · Energy ManngemenI · IT ?bnning · Public Safety Communications · Transportation Technologies SWAT Teams are highly versatile. They can be used to review a feasibiliw smd); an~tx=e a service or prograrrk advise on alternative approaches or help preparing an RFP. · Brownfield Technologies Many other areas of technolo~' plnnning and implementation. '[30'i ¢ennsvwan,c Avenue'~NW ~'asn*nc3~cr, DC 2000z.-;792 · Te: 202.026.2,.t0C 800 8£2.z195/' · Fa> 202 020.24<'~. · fmc... WORKING TO BRING IHt BliNEfl'l'S 0t: TECHNOLOGY TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Connnucd from Pa~¢ t uit~rlg re · ~ ~ Recent SWAT Cons enorts mclucte: · C/fy and County of Denver, Colorado to assist on developing an E-gov initiative. · Clark County, Nevada to develop energ7 conservation strategies; as a result, the County has enacted an energy conservation program. · Gty of Urbandale, Iowa to assist developing an Irrformadon Technolog?,- Strategic Plan. Related Tools Collaboratou The PTI Collaborator' is a tool that can be used in conjunction with SX~%T. This decision-support tool is a portable, c'611aboradve workspace that includes laptop computers, collaborative decision support software and professional facilitators. The Collaboratory can be used to build consensus, set priorities and make decisions about strategic directions. Use the Collaboratory to assess readiness, generate ideas and evaluate options for implementation. Speed, instantaneous documentation and high productivity are just some of the attributes of the Collaborator?-. About PTI Public Tech2oloD-, Inc., is the non-profit technolog7 research and development organization of'the National League of C/des, the National Association of Counties, and the International City./County Management Association. Public Technology, Inc. monitors activities nationwide and serves as a clearinghouse of resources, reports and links to local govenunent. For more information on SWAT Teams and related resources, contact Bobbi Arnold, Senior Manager, Consulting Services at 2C2/626-2426, bamold~ pd. org. Updated 612001 APR - S 20C2,~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF (1) MEDIUM-DUTY ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AMBULANCE FROM AMERICAN LAFRANCE MEDIC MASTER CORPORATION FOR THE AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN THOUSAND THIRTEEN DOLLARS ($137,013). THIS VEHICLE WILL BE PURCHASED UNDER THE FLORIDA SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION BID #00-08- 0905. OBJECTIVE: This Executive Summary was previously approved by the Board on July 31, 2001 (Item #16G3). The fund number under "Financial Impact" was incorrectly identified as 490; it should have been Fund 350. This Executive Summary identifies the correct Fund. CONSIDERATION: Section XIII B of the Collier County Purchasing Policy allows the County to join with the other units of government in cooperative purchaisng ventures. The Florida Sheriffs Association awarded a contract for medium-duty advanced life support ambulances which affords Collier County the opportunity to purchase under the same terms and conditions. Purchase of one ambulance is required. This ambulance is a growth unit funded by Impact Fees appropriated by the Board for purchase this Fiscal Year. The Florida Sheriffs Association bid base cost was $90,535. The cost to outfit the unit to meet existing Collier County EMS fleet standards, and new State of Florida EMS vehicle requirements will be $46,478. Total purchase price is $137,013. Of the twenty-five (25) ambulances currently active within the Colllier County fleet, all were purchased fi.om American LaFrance Medic Master Corporation since 1995. The quality, performance, and dependability of these ambulances have been excellent. Maintenance and upkeep have been fairly simple. All Fleet Management mechanics have been trained on repair and maintenance of "Medic Master" ambulances, and a standard repair parts stockage has been established. Product support from American LaFrance Medic Master Corporation has been outstanding. Additionally, the structure and other safety items have been judged superior to products of other ambulance companies surveyed by Collier County staff. Considering these factors, standardizing lhe County's fleet with "Medic Master" ambulances is considered in the best interest of Collier County both operationally and economically. mm AGEND~ 13'15~ ! No. /4,/~ / APR - 9 2002 FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to purchase one (1)medium-duty advanced life suppor~ ambulance is $137,013 and funds have been budgeted in EMS :impact Fee Fund (350)., under Project number 80120. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None at this time. RECOMMENDATION: Ti~e Board of County Commissioners approve the purchase of one (1) medium-duty advanced life support "Medic Master" ambulance from American LaFrance Medic Master Corporation using Florida Sheriffs Asso,. :ation Bid #00-08-0905 at a total purchase price of' $137,013. SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY' REVIEWED BY REVIEWED BY REVIEWED BY: '~om Ma~uf-Oe, Commander Emerger~cy Medical Services '--,';~& (. .~,. .i/ Date: iieffl~g/e,/EIMS O~ations Director t:mergency Medical Se~ices ~ ~ , Date: ~eve Carnell, Director ~'urcbasing Ge~al~e~i~s [ z~',--~.~' ~," , ., Date: Dah~rofl,'Director ~'~ Fleet Mamgemen~-~ ~ Pineau Acting Administrator Emergency Se~ices Division / AGENDA ITEM No. ,/al / APR - 9 2002 BID. AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT PURSUIT, ADMINISTRATIVE NON-PURSUIT, UTILIT~', FIRE & RESCUE VEHICLES, TRUCKS & VANS Participa~i~ Sheriff's Offices & Local Governmental Agencies of the State of Florida Coordmazed By The Florida She~ff-~ Association & Florida Association of Counties AGENDA ITEM No. /~/: i APR - 9 2002 pg. ~ FLORIDA SI-IERIFFS ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 12519 · Tallahassee, FL 32317-2519 PHONE [850) 877-2165 · FAX {850! 878-8665 V~EB Si~E: HTTP://IVWW.F'LSHEtRJFFS.ORG DATE: TO: FRO M: October 5, 2000 ALL PROSPECTIVE PARTICIPANTS Gary, E. Perkms Deputy Executive DtrectorfVehicle Bid Coordinator SHERIFF~' OFFICES &'LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA COOPERATIVE BII3 FOR PURSUIT, ADMINISTRATIVE NON-PURSUIT, UTILITY, FIRE & RESCUE VEHICLES, TRUCKS & VANS Bid No. 00-08-O905 We are pleased to announce that the Flomda Sheriffs Assoc/atlon and the Flor/da Associamon of Counties has successfu~y conducted its eighth storey,nde competitive bid for vehicles wlmch mcludes pohce pursuat, acimmmr_rative non-pursuit, urJAID'. £n-e & rescue vehicles, trucks & vans. Bids be ex'tended and guaranteed to a. nv and aJ2 urnts of local governments/political subdivisions inc!ud- Lng but not limited to county., loca~ cou.~t-y boa.rd of pubhc mst~,-uctlon municipakities and/or police agencies, other local pubHc or pubhc safe,~v agencies or author/ties w/tho Lhe State of F!onda tn accordance with the provisions of Chapter 287. ?.8., and 60A~ Flor/da Admm/s~auve Code. any state aency mcludk~ r_he D~sion of Ur~iversities. Department of Chilch-en and F~m,.ly Department of Hea2th. Deparu-nent of Juverule Justice and Department of Correct/ohs wbnch elec~ and m author'~zed to purchase from a source other than the State of Flor/da conu~ac:. All interested parties who wish to purchase from this contract may do so by following these simple procedures: ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS Contact the designated dealership (see pages 20-21) tLsted in the zone from wk/ch you rash to puxchase and advise them of your interest to purmha~e from the Sherit~' O~fices & Local Governmental Agencies of the' State of Florida Bid No. 0008-0905. They ~ assist you w/th the placement of your order and answer any questions you may have regarding the ve_~ncies purchased through th~ program. ~PORTANT NOTE: All agenc/es ordermg any FORD product, pleaze note that the FIN CODE for the Florida Sheriffs A.ssociar~on i.s *QE065' and should be used m order to obr~a.m the Ford concessmns. Also, you must use your FIN CODE as a secondary, number. For further txfformation contact [he Fleet Customer Information Center at 1-800-34-FLEET. Bid Award Artrtous-~ernertt (00-08-0905) "AGENDA ItEM No. /~,~' ! APR - 9 2002 2. YOU MUST send a copy of the ORIGLNAL PURCHASE ORDER (includt~_~ FSA's Contract .No. 00-08-0905) you submit~ed to the participating dealer to: Florida Sheriffs Association P. O. Box 12519 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-2519 ATTN: Gary. Perkins, Cooperanve Bid Coordmator 3. Basic information required on all pttrchase orders is listed on Page 23 of U~is Bid Award Announcement. Purchase orders lacMng the requ~ed basic/nformation listed may result m the delay of placement and/or confirmation of orders. NOTE: Purchasers are remmded that the issuance of a Pm-ch~se Order does not /n itself guarantee the phacement of an order. Dealers are required to prowlde purchasers w/th a 'Confirmation of Order" within seven (7~ calendar days alter receipt of purchase order. Purchasers are encouraged to con~act the dealer ff a 'Confirma- tion of Order' has not been received w/thEn a reasonable time frame and request its issuance. 4. Agencies wh. ich elect to purchase off this contract wiJ.l Incur the following Admmlstrative Fees: · Pursuit, A~mtnistrative Non-Pllrsuit. Utility Vehicles, Trucks & Vans (Speciflcat/ons 1- 22) - Due to numerous requests from va~ous purchasmg agencies, the $50.00 admm/stra- rive fee per vehicle formerly prod to the F~ by ptu-chasmg agencies ~ now be pad ~o the FSA bv *.he contrac~qg dealersN/ps. Dealers have mciuded the $50.00 per u~t fee m bid prices arid made it a part of :he base umt's purchase pr/ce. Th/s ~ elLrmnate r_he need for purchasIng agencies to have to prepare two purchase ore/ers and cur two checks, thereby reducmg theu- workload. · Fire & Rescue Units (Spec/flcat/ons 23-28) - F/re and rescue dealers/manu£acrurer's a.re to charge purchasmg agencies an admimstrat~ve fee of 1/2 percent {.005) of the tom.1 mvoice amount ~ase u_~/t plus op~ons) to be collected and pa~d to the FSA by ,gne con~.racnmg dealers/manufacturer's. Adm~n~snranve fees for fire & rescue umts will not be tnciuded or made a pa_~ of the bidders base un/t purchase pr/ce for fire & rescue u_n~ts. Tine fh-e & rescue dealers/manufacturer's ~d be responsible for calculating and adV:smg the prospecnve chasing agencies of the 1/2 percent (.0051 admtnistrat/ve fee to be charged a_nd included the total Invoice amount at the t_tme of order. The purchasmg agencies ,z~2t mclude r~he admm/strat~ve fee as a part of their purchase order request. Agaua. th~s w/il e~arama~e the need for purchasing agencies to have to prepare two separate purchase orders and checics. Tins program is designed to pro~qde parUcipatmg agencies w~th the most econormcally priced patrol. adminisu-arrve non-pursuit, utility, fn-e & rescue vehicles, u-ucks & vans. taJ/ored to then- spec~,c needs, m a prompt and Urnely manner. One of the Umque characteristics incorporated toro tins progre.m which dlsrmgumhes it/rom others is that this Bid Conrract is awarded to the lowest responsible bidder by manufacturer by spec2zS- cation by zone for all police package vehicles and to each of the lowest responsible bidderis) by mmnufacrurer by spectficanon by zone for all non-poLice package vehicles. Whereas. under the Scare Contract the bid ~s awarded only. to the single lowest bidder by zone. Thc Florida Sheriffs AssoclaDon z_nd the Flor/da AssocAatlon of Cotmtlcs realize that Sheriffs' Offices. Police Agencies zmd other units of local governments differ from the state m that they must prov~ce economically based rnmi~tenance and stocked pm~ts for the/r ~ee~. They must consider overa_E oper~rlonaJ cost of their ye. hi.es instead of just conside-"mg 'Low Bid" on the purchase of the vehicle. 'This program's bid award system not only provides the purchaser ~-lth the means to make so..nd dec. ions on dedicated fleet needs, but also offers the convenience of shoppmg a-~d pm-chas- ing from a smgle contract. IMI~ORTANT NOTE: The m~m~facrm-er's have u~mnurxced r_hat they ~uJd be produC~g iirniteg 2 Bid Award Armouncernenr ~00-08-0905) A~ENDA ITEM No. / ~.. ,,c: / ,A, PR - 9 2002 .~0,000 lb. GVWR CAB & C~X$ (4 x 2] (Specification #~2): (con~nu. ed N~tzne of De~lershlp Type Vehicle Zone Classic Chevrolet, Inc. Classic Chevrolet, Inc. Chevrolet HD 7500 Chevrolet }iD 7500 Cent~aJ Southern Type I Ambulance {4 m 2) [Spect~i¢&tton #23): American LaFrance MedicMaster Elite Fire & Safety. Equip.. Inc. Wheeled Coach Industr/es, Inc. America.n LaFrance MedicMaster ELite Fire & Safety Equip., Inc, Wheeled Coach Industries, inc. Ford F-350 Ford F-350 Ford F-350 Ford F-450 Ford F~450 Ford F-450 All Zones All Zones All Zones AL1 Zones AL1 Zones All Zones VCheeled Coach Indusu-ies, Inc. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. Chex-role: C3500 Chex~-olet YF2 HE) w AL1 Zones All Zones Type I Ambulance (4 x 4] (Specification #23]: American LaFrance MedicMaster ELite FLre & SafeD' Equip., inc. Wheeled Coach [ndusu-ies. Inc. Ford F-350 Ford F-350 Ford F-350 Afl Zones Afl Zones All Zones Amer/ca.n LaFrance MedicMaster E1/te FLre & SafeD' Equip.. Inc. Wheeled Coach Indusunes. Inc. Ford F-450 Ford F-450 Ford F-450 All Zones All Zones Ali Zones Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. Chevrolet C3500 w Ali Zones Type I Ambulmace, Medium Duty [4 x 2) [Specification #24]: American LaF~ce Medic.Master Elite Fire & Safety Eqmp.. Inc. Wheeled Coach Industries. Inc. Bs~e Unit Price Elite Fire & Safety Equip.. Inc. Wheeled Coach Industries, inc. $38,602.67 $38,852.67 $73,182.00 $73,554.00 $66,843.00 $77,458.00 $80,715.00 $75,875.00 S64.085.00 S73,28C.00 $75.007.00 $76,165.00 $69.432.00 $81,133.00 $83,992.00 $80,598.00 $68,230.00 Freighdiner FL60 W All Zones $90,535.00 Freightlmer FL$O All Zones $96,157.00 FreAghfllner FL60 All Zones $96,850.00 International 4700LP International 4700LP All Zones $95.439.00 Afl Zones $95,775.00 TTpe H .~nhulance, Van (4 x 2} (SpecLflcation #25]: All Zones $48,502.00 All Zones $42,500.00 ELite Fire & Safety Equ/p.. Inc, Wheeled Coach Indusu-ies, Inc. Ford E-350 Ford E-350 Type Tlr Ambulance (4 x 2] (SpecLflemtion #26): Ali Zones $71,770.00 AL1 Zones $64.254.00 Ali Zones $62,906.00 Amemca~ LaFrance Medic-Master ELite Fire & Safety, Eqmp., Inc. W~celed Coach indusu-/es, inc. Ford XL E-350 Ford 2CL E-350 Ford Xl, E-350 18 Bid Award Aru'muncement {00-08-0905) AGENDA ITEM No. //;~: ~. APR - 9 2002 17,500 lb. GVWR CAB & CHASSIS (4 x 21 (Specification #20): Name of Dealership Type Vehicle Zone DuvaJ Ford Ford Super Du~.' ~r Western F-550 Dural For~ Ford Super Du%~ * Norr. hern F-550 Duval Ford Ford Super Duty. ~t CenwaJ F-550 Duval Ford Ford Super Du~, w Southern F-550 17,500 lb. GVWR CAB & CHASSIS (4 x 4] [Specification #20): BuG Untt Price $26,292.9© $26,264.00 $26,292.0C $26,344.00 Duv'al Ford Ford Super Duty ~ Western $29,684.00 F-550 DuvaJ Ford Ford Super Duty ~ Northern $29,649.00 F-550 Don Reid Ford, Inc. Ford Super Du~.' ~r Cenu-ai $29,684.00 F-550 Duval Ford Ford Super Duty ~r Sour_hem $29,724.00 F-550 SSI5 {4 x 2) {Specification #21): Ford Super Du~y F-650 Ford Super Duty F-650 Ford Super Duty F-650 Ford Super Du~.' F-650 ~r C en~-al ~r Sour. hem 25,950 lb. GVWR CAB Orville BectC'ord Ford, Duval Ford uvaJ Ford Duvai Ford ChevrolEt HD 6500 Che~-olet I-LD 6500 Chevrolet I-ID 6500 Chevrolet t-ID 6500 WesleY?. Nor%hem Cenlra~ 5oulh~rn Classic ChevroleL In£, Classic Chevrolel:. Inc. Classic Chevrolet_ Inc. Cl~sic ChevroleL Inc. [4 x 21 (Sp~c/~caZion #22): Ford Super Duty. F-750 Ford Super Du~' F-750 Ford Super Duty F-750 F~rd Super Duly F-750 ~r Weslern ~ Northern ~r Cenn-ai ~r Sour. hem $0,0oo lb. GVWR CA~ & ~' ?~ ~.$SIS Orc. lle Beckford Ford/},i Du-vnl Ford Dw.,al Ford Dura/Ford Chevro~tHD7500 Chevro~tHD7500 Classic ChevroleL Inc. Classic ChevroleL Inc. Bid Award ¢rw~owzce:-. ! ~: 0-08-0905) S32,000.00 $32,063.00 $32,063.00 $32.143,00 $38,626.07 $38,626.07 $38.276.07 $38.676.07 $32.120.00 $32.193.00 $32,193.00 $32.273.00 $38.852.67 $38.~52.67 27 AGENDA IIEM No. /~-/; J APR - 9 2002 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION. COUNTIES FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION & FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES 2001 FREIGHTLINER FL60 "Specification #24 (Type I Ambulance, 4 x 2 Med/,~m Duty) The Fre/ghtlLner FL 60, .Type I Ambulance purchased through this contact comes w/th all the standard equipment as specified bv the manufacturer for this model a_nd FSA's base veh]c.:e spccfficatlon{s) requirements which are included and made a parr of ttUs contract's vehicle base price as awarded by manufacturer by specification by zone. ZONE: ~r All Zones All Zones All Zones BASE FRICE: $90,535.00 $96,157.00 S96,850. O0 DEALERz Amemca~n LaFrm,,.c~ ELite Fire & Safety. Wheeled Coach MeciicMaster Equipment, Inc. While the Flor/da She:~affs Associat/cn and the Florida Association of Counties have identified equipment required to meet KKK-A-1822D, dated November 1, 1994. or the most current revision for _Type I Ambulance, we realize equipment needs a_nd preferences are going to vary from agency to agency.. Any options required or changes required by purchaser shall be made throu~a the vendor listed. NOTE: An offic/al 1Lstmtg of al/ add/delete options and t. heir pmces should be obca.ined from the approprmm vendor. ~r = Spec/ficar_ion Low Bid Bid Al. yard AnnonmcemenZ (00-08-0905) I.,EGEKD FOR ~/ADD OPTIONS Every tlne will rc~tun'e a DOI.,I. AR VALUE or o~ of ~e foB~ ~~: ~ = ophon not b~d ~ v~or 523 A(~ENDA ITEM ~o. /a,~ l APR - 9 2002 PO- ~ FLORIDA ASSOCIATION -~ COUNTIES FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION & FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES 2001 INTERNATIONAL 4700LP ..:' Specification #24 (Type I Ambulance, 4 x 2 Medi,]m Duty) The In~mational 470©L? Type I Ambulance purchased through this conwact comes ~.h all the standard eqmpmenr a~ specked by the manufacturer for this model and FSA's base vehicle specification{s) requtremenm wi-.ich are included and made a par~ of thru conr_ract's vehicle base price as awarded by ma.n'~fac.~rer by specffical;lon by zone. ZONE: W Ail Zones All Zones IL~SE PRICE: $95,439,00 $95,775.00 DEALRR: E',.ite .---~e & Safe~'v Wheeled Coach Eam~m~z:. Lnc. While the Florida She:.:-:~ .~ssocia~ion and r_he Florida Association of CounOes have idenr_Lfied eqmpment required ~c .~..'-~-~ :~C~-A-1822D, dated November 1, 1994, or the most curren~ reds:or. for .Type I Ambnlmnce, w~ :c~e equipment needs and preferences are going :o va~ from agen~' to agency, Any options rea'~rcd or c~anges requJ, red by purchaser shall be made Lb. rough the vendor ~J~ted, NOTE: An officiaJ lis~x~_, r: ~ add/delete options and the/r prices should be obtained f~m the appropriate vendor. '~ = Specifica~on Low Et.. 524 ~ FOR DEI~'TE/ADD OPTIONS NC = no ~uo~ ~e = nor app~le tc = Op~O~ ~Ot bid ~ t~id Award Ann~ncemern (00.08-0905) AC-,~NDA ITEM APR - 9 2002 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION o_~ COUNTIES FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION & FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES SPECIFICATION #24 - TYPE I AMB~CE 2 WI~EL DRIVE MEDIUM DUTY [DUAL REAR WHR~EL, CAB & CHASSIS) FREIGHTIXNER OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT ALL ITEMS FACTORY INSTALr. F-D UNLESS OTttERWISE INDICATED 1. ENGI-NE Diesel engine, 6-cwiinder rmmmum, Heavy-duty akemator, minimum 250 amp, Maintenance iree heavy-du~.' battenes, 750 CCA rm. mm~. Man~fac:u~er's heavy-duvy engine cooling TRANSMISSI©.N a. Eleclyonic Allison Transmission b, Manufacturer's ~-ansrmssion oil cooler: wa~er :o oil heavy-duty cooling. 3. AXLES -- Front Axle: 8,000~ l~ar Axle: 12,000# Front Suspension: 8,000~ Rear Suspension: 12,000# au- suspension with dual insr~a~t response leveling valves. 4. PERFOR~NCE ITEMS An~i-lock brakes Power brakes, disc type front, disc or drum r~ar. Fuel capacity., minimum 45 gallon Heavy-duty front and rem- shocks. 5. COMFORT ITEMS Fac~m;. ir~talled an- conditioning Tinted glass {fac%o~ tint) Dual ~ suspension sea~s with Bid Award Annmuncemenz (00-08-0905) 521 ACgENDAJ'rEM No._ /~? APR - 9 2002 Base Specifications #24 - Type I Arrtbulance (Medium Dut'yJ d. Rubber floor mat instead of carpeuing e. AM/FM radio a. Driver and passenger lap and shoulder belt with reu'actor. b. Dual elecU-ic horns c. Outside mirrors to provide vision for vehicles 96" wide. d. Two speed wipers vath intermittent e. Interior dome lights wired to right and lef~ doors, f. Halogen headlights with da.W, Jme running fearu.re. rm~s A:~ w~E~s a. BSW, all season ~rcad radial 19.5 ir~h t_tres 8. CHASSIS. FRAME. CA~ Minimum GVWR 19,000 lbs. Cab to center of axle 102 roches 9. MODULAR BODY CONSTRUCTION The aznb~!mnce body a.nd patient compa,ruuent shall be sufficient m size to mee: C~,e requiremenks of ~'-as specification a_nd Gaose of paragrapk 3. lC. i of khe current K_KK- A- 1822D. 522 .iiid.A~z~:i Arm~u~ceme~ (00-08-0905) A(3E N DAJTE M No. /~' APR - Base Specifica~io,.s #24 - Type I Ambulance (Medium Duryj d. Rubber floor mat instead of ca,,-pe~mg e. AM/FM radio a, Drover and passenger lap a_nd shoulder belt ~uth rc~ractor. b. Dual etec~ric horns c. Our~ide mirrors to provide vision for vehicles 96' wide, d. Two speed w/pcrs ~ith /ntcrn~l~cnt c. Inter/or dome ~lgh~ W~rcd m ~ ~d lc~ doo~. f. H~ogcn h~ ~ da~e ~g feaze. a. BSW, all season tread radial 19.5 inch ~es 8. CaASS~$, FRA~NiZ, CAB Minimum GVW~R 19,000 lbs. Cab to center of axle 102 ~.nches 9. MODULAR BODY CONSTRUCT!, ,ON The ambulnnce body and patient comparmaent sh~ll bt sufficient m size ro mee: the reqmrements cf Lkls spec~ficancn and r_hose of paragraph 3,10.1 of the current ~ A-1822D. 522 t~id Award Arv'm~..~u:ernent ~00-08-090 5,1 APR - il 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VOID COMMITTEE SELECTION OF FIRMS FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS FOR RFP #01-3290 "FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES". OBJECTIVE: Obtain Board's direction on Committee's selection of firms for professional consultant services for upcoming engineering services. CONSIDERATIONS: The RFP was issued in accordance with Florida State Statute 287.055, Consultant Competitive Negotiation Act, and publicly advertised on September 26, 2001. Notices were sent to 140 firms with 67 vendors requesting full packages. 28 responses were received by the due date of October 26, 2001. A Selection Committee Meeting was held on December 4, 2001 and after review and discussion; by consensus of the members, the following 18 firms were recommended for award (in no order): Johnson Engineering Parsons Engineering Science Pitman Hartenstein Malcolm Pirnie DRMP HDR Engineering Agnoli, Barber and Brundage Barraco & Associates Hartman & Associates Q. Grady Minor TKW Consulting Engineers Stanley/RWA Joint Venture CH2M Hill TBE Group Hole Montes Boyle Engineering Consultants Coastal Engineering Wilson Miller The RFP referenced that work orders would be issued in accordance with the County's Purchasing Policy. Purchasing Policy Section VII limits each work order assignment to a maximum initial amount of $90,000 and a maximum initial contract amount of $500,000. This item was withdrawn from the January 8, 2002 agenda (Item 16 (E) 2) because of a protest made by Wilkison and Associates. A copy of the protest and the Purchasing Director's Decision is enclosed. At the February 12, 2002 Board of County Commissioner Meeting, the original recommendation as to the short list was recommended to be upheld and the protest denied. Because of continued vocal protests by Wilkison and Associates at this meeting, the Board directed staff, in particular the Deputy County Manager, to form a small section of staff to further review the Bid Protest and Selection Process used in this RFP. A meeting of this Bid Protest Review Committee took place on April 3, 2002. The review committee found that the original selection committee process was rather arbitrary and random as consensus was being reached. FISCAL IMPACT: Each using department shall allocate funds from the appropriate cost centers as the work orders are assigned. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This has no growth management impact. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County direct the County Manager to appoint a new selection committee to begin the process all over again using the already submitted proposals. APPROVED BY: ~mes V. Mudd, P.E. Deputy County Manager DATE: February 1,2002 AEC National Inc. 5150 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 600 Naples, FI. 34103 Attention: Jeffrey A. Nunner Wilkison & Associates 3506 Exchange Ave Naples, FI. 34104 Attention: David S. Wilkison Re: Intent to Protest Award of RFP 01-3290, Annual Engineering Services Agreement Dear Messrs. Nunner and Wilkison: I have reviewed your protest of the referenced award recommendation and discussed this matter with Crag Pager and Vince Cautero in person. The issues raised in the protest can be summarized as follows: One selection committee member offered negatives comments regarding past experience with joint venture firms, hence applying criterion not published in the RFP. 2. In the final round of selection, another committee member voted negatively against all firms without transportation planning expertise. 3. The individual committee scores were not used as a basis for making the final selection decision, contrary to the selection procedure as stated in the RFP. Before addressing each of the issues, it is important to first briefly reference language from the RFP document: The solicitation provided an overview of the selection process and specified the evaluation criteria to be used by each committee member to initially score each proposal. The RFP did not specify a pre-determined number of firms for selection, leaving that to the discretion of the committee. Under paragraph 6 of the Evaluation and Selection Procedure, the committee was to compile the rankings of each individual committee member. The final committee recommendation was to be based upon review of the rankings and consensus of the committee. f AGENDA ITL:. ': APR - 2902 Mr. Jeffrey Nunner Mr. David Wilkison February 1,2002 Page 2 of 3 A total of 28 proposals were received. In reviewing the audiotape of the committee meeting and the RFP file, the actual order of events in the selection meeting can be summarized as follows: r~ Each committee member brought their scores to the selection committee meeting of December 4t', 2001. Each committee member shared initial comments and observations regarding each proposal. As the various members spoke, some began verbally grouping the firms, based initially on their individual rankings. After each committee member had shared his initial comments, the committee discussed the appropriate number of firms for selection, but did not initially reach a consensus on a specific number. After considerable discussion, the group decided to have each member vote "yes", "no" or "maybe" on each firm. The votes of each member were tabulated and read back to the group. Five firms received a "yes" vote from all six members. Seven firms received "yes" votes from five of the six members. The committee initially decided that there was a clear consensus to recommend those 12 firms for selection. The committee then revisited the question of how many firms to select. After discussion, the committee elected to include the six firms that received at least 4 "yes" votes in the addition to the 12 firms previously selected to bring the total number of selected firms to 18. With regard to the consideration of the joint venture (issue #1 ), one member did in fact vote "no" on selecting either of the joint venture proposals in the final round of consideration. Subsequent to our conversation, I spoke with that individual and ask him why he did so. He indicated that he did so initially because he felt the list of firms needed to be narrowed. In doing so, he considered his prior experience with the AECNVilkison joint venture on the Lake Kelley drainage project last year. While he indicated that he considers both firms to be competent overall, he said there were difficulties in receiving all of the deliverables timely and also receiving the invoices properly prepared. From his perspective, the joint venture created some difficulties in managing that project. Though he would consider both firms capable individually, he did not rank the joint venture as highly or include either joint venture firm in his final selection vote. I also spoke with the other member, which the protest contends voted against firms without transportation engineering background (issue ~¢2). He too indicated that he was looking to narrow down the number of selected firms and believed that most of the work orders under the agreement would be transportation-related. Accordingly, he ranked the AEC/Wilkison proposal 20m in his initial ranking and did not vote to include that proposal in the final recommendation. As with the other committee member, he believes that AEC and Wilkison are capable firms. In reviewing both issues 1 and 2, I believe that both committee members acted within their purview in ranking and prioritizin~ll;~m'IS.~ .'r .APR - 9 2002 | Mr. Jeffrey Nunner Mr. David Wilkison February 1,2002 Page 3 of 3 As for the question concerning the compilation of the individual rankings, paragraph 6 of the evaluation and selection procedures reads as follows; "The committee will compile individual rankings for each proposal to determine committee recommendations .... The final recommendation will De decided based on review of scores and consensus of the committee." Typically, the processes of ranking, compilation and consensus are achieved as follows; 1 ) the members finalize their initial rankings; 2) the members share their rankings with the group; and 3) the committee tabulates the rankings, discuss them collectively and reaches a consensus recommendation. The recommendation may vary from the tabulated rankings. In this instance, each committee member ranked each proposal and shared co~mer~ts regarding their rankings. The committee discussed the number of firms they wis ~ _. To select and then attempted to prioritize the list by grouping the firms into "yes", "no' ~ .:~ "maybe" sub groups. After reviewing the lang.~.~; ~ of paragraph 6 against the committee's method, I believe that the committee acre: .... r~ the purview of the referenced paragraph as individual rankings were in fact pr~: ::, compiled into three groups for the purposes of further discussion and a cons~: ~'eached based on the compilation. It should also be noted that the ultimate comm~. -: ecision was extremely inclusive as 18 of the 28 (or 64%) submitting firms were s- :: Therefore, it is the dec staff to proceed forwar.. recommended. Under s of the Purchasing Dire; files a subsequent writ: of receipt of the decisic office not later than cio the Purchasing Director to reject the protest and authorize ~:ward of the referenced contract as originally :::ion XVIII.F of the Board's purchasing policy, the decision ,:Ii Joe considered final and conclusive unless the protestor ~ction to the Purchasing Director within two business days ;'~ce, any subsequent written objection must be filed with this :~siness on Tuesday February 5, 2002. Sincerely, Steve Camel l Purchasing/General S~ Director ,~anum'y 9, 2002 ~:l Mr. Steve C.m-~ll Purcl'msin~/C~nend Services Di~r JAN I 0 ~vc ~s Di~on 3301 T~ Tml ~ ~1~ ~ ~112 ~. ~ 01-~2~, F~ T~ ~ ~ A~t 1. N~e ~d ~ of ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ bid n~ ~ rifle. 2. ~~of~~. 3. A ~tem~ of ~ ~ of ~ f~ 4. A ~i~ ~t of~ ~fi~ f~ ~e~ ~ of~y ~1~ ~, ~, 5. A de~ for ~ ~ef~ ~ch ~e ~ ~ ~ Nsme 8ad ,dd~ of Couu~ .geacy ~ff~ 8ad ~e bid ~um~r .ud ev~ ~t ~ ~n~ly ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ follo~ F~ili~ ~emem ~e ~ N~r is 011-32~ ~ ~e t~e ~ "F~ed Te~ ~of~io~ ~ ~." The nsme .nd .ddr~ M ~e prot~ng ps~. ~s joint ven~ ~s~ of ~ fo~o~ fi~ 1~ ~ ~ l~ ~lii~ ~C ~o~ ~. Wi~n ~ ~ia~ lnc, ~ 150 T~ T~ N~ S~ 600 35~ ~ge Avenu~ ~, FIo~ ~103 ~, ~ori~ ~41~ (~ 1) 26~37~ (~ 1 ) ~7~2 F~ (~1)26~911~ F~ (~1) ~3-51~ ,i~L~C: fqmt, oned inc.. $1 ]50 T,.,..~..~ Tm~ NO~ ~jal~ 1900, Idmp#,a. FledtM ~4103. (&41 ) Zl~*.~700 Fmx ~il41) ~3-~117 I&,lkZ~of,&~4~a,50~Fjat~nO~A~mn~,k~FkmMa~4104 ~41)14~67~2 F~141)14~-S17~ Ps~e 2 ors A statement of disputed issues of materhl fact. Committee member Peter Hnyden co, s~ a negative vote for ou~joint venture b~,ause it ~sajom~ven~. Hesmtedtluuhedoe~notlikejomt vmm~res. Tl~RFPdoes not dinuadc joint ventures and i,t speciflctUy nddrenm joint venture projx~aJs. Mr. Jhydcn ranked our firm$11 outof28ba.~donhissco~. TJ~isra~pmourfirm~ in thg top hlLf of ~e ix, opos~s yet h,- did not ca~t a f~vorubtc rot- boc~use of his ~ Commitme mcmbcr Don Sco~ cast a ne. pliv~ vo~ fo~ o~r joint vuture because it did these services wu cast a ngsntiv~ vo~ by lvlr. S~t IvLr. Sooll works in Ibc in ~ms~on ptfuming, tluts we should no~ htve hod tl~ hgid n~ains~ us, The Public Utilities EA~neenn8 Deptrtment rgpresentative did not ~ut ne~tive votes to firms without utilities e~neeru~ cxpcrtise, thus tl~re was tm inequity in thc votit~ m~ores an~ con~us of conur~t~c." Propos~ were s:ofl~. ~ ~be sm~s w~c nm used ~s · basis for tl~ selection. Ou;joint venture ra~ived thc following runkings out of 2~ proposes submitted: A. N. Kom. ra~: 1! Don Scott, r~ 20 ~ ~t, rank 23 J/m McGee. rm~k $ Mirth Riley, ra~i: ~ Pgt~r 14aydcr~. rank l 1 Thc avcrag¢ making of 13.5 would hav~ in~lude, d ua in thc aclc~d li~ aa 1 $ of ll~ 28 A ~,acl~ ~lamncn~ of the ultlma~/acla all~l nad o! any r~vaat ~ smm~u~ and romtitu~ionnl pt~ovia~oal ~sll~ ~ pm~",n~ ~ ~ acdg~::md rums bas~ or. a "yes", "no" ~ '~maybe" vote. Fizms w~re seicx;axl if lines/reociv~ gout ~mo~ "y~s" vot:s This methodology was in dinner violad~x of ~ ~ which "Ting nmamittc¢ w~ compii¢ individual mnkin~ got ~ proposal m tlm~mia¢ amd ~ml~sus of comauu~" Pag~ 3 of 3 COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT TO ATTEND FUNCTION(S) SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-4 I0, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal, business, environmental, educational, charitable, social, professional, wade, homeowners, ethnic, and civic associations / organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters. In accordance with Resolution No. 99-410, Commissioner Jim Coletta hereby requests that the Board of County Commissioners approve for payment by the Clerk his/her attendance at the following function / event: Function / Event: Collier County Education Foundation's Golden Apple Teacher Recognition Program Public Purpose: Represent Collier County as Chairman and interact with constituents Date of Function / Event: April 12, 2002 Amount to be paid by the County: $92.00 payable to the Collier County Education Foundation Mileage: AGENDA Coletta, D~stnct 5 NO. pg. / COLLIER COUNTY · Foundation ~ty Co~ssion 3~01 T~ Tr. E Naples, FL 34112 De~ ~. C~er: The ye~ 2002 ~11 m~k the 12~ ~vers~ of~e Golden Apple Teacher Reco~tion Proem in Collier Co~ty. The Collier Co~W Education Fo~dation ~11 be celebrat~g excellence ~ education at ~e Golden Apple Teacher Reco~tion di~er on Friday, April 12, 2002 at The ~tz-Cmlton, Naples. In addition, the Academy of Teachers Alumni will host the Teachers Are Heroes reception the same evemng. The reception will begin at 7:30 p.m. with dessert and beverage in the ballroom at the LaPlaya Beach Resort in Vanderbilt Beach· Guests will watch the Golden Apple Teacher Recognition Program from 8-9 p.m. on large ~ns in the ballroom. Following the telecast the new 2002 Golden Apple Recipients and The Ritz-Carlton a,,~er guests will join the guests at the LaPlaya Beach Resort for dancing and a cash bar. WINK-TV will also be broadcasting live from the resort during the 11 p.m. news. The dress for the Teachers Are Heroes will be cocktail attire (business suits would be appropriate). We feel that our teacher recognition program is an exemplary program and would like to invite you to altend this evening of celebration. Your attendance shows your support for our program, but we also appreciate if you make a financial contribution towards our efforts. Please remm your reservation form lo the founrlofion by March 27, 2002. ,~' We would also appreciate if you would assist us in congratulating the recipients bs~n~mg us 6 lett~ congr'z~alations thai will be presented to the Golden Apple teachers that evening. 'Ire roiiowing teachers will be receiving the prestigious recognition award: Jennifer Briggs - Pelican Marsh Elementary; Pete Cade, Jr.- RCMA Charter School; Lam'a Heald - Vineyards Elementary; Melissa Rooney - Vineyards Elementary; Marion R a~ano - pine Ridge Middle; Karen Torres- Corkscrew Elementary Please send the letters to the Collier County Education Foundation, 2590 Golden Gate Parkway, Sake 101, be presented the teachers. · 1-02 Collier County Education Foundati Chairman of the Board 2590 Golden Gate ParleaTay * Suite 101 * Naples. FL 34105 · (941) 643-4755 · (941) 6454799 lax mail@ccef-swfI.or~. - www. ccef-swfl.or~ COLLIER COUNTY · Foundation Golden Apple Teacher Recognition Dinner Government Official Reservation Form Friday, April 12, 2002 The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Guest I would like to make a donation to the Collier County Education Foundation and reserve two seats on Friday, April 122 for: Golden Apple Teacher Recognition Dinner at The Ritz-Carlton. Dress: Black Tie. Includes tran~ortation to the LaPlaya Resort for the Teachers Are Heroes following the telecast. ~'~Te, achers are Heroes Reception at the LaPlaya Beach Resort. Dress: Cocktail/business suit. ~Enclosed is my check for $ q ~ made payable to the Collier County Education Foundation. Please charge to my credit card # circle one (Visa or MasterCard) Expiration Date Unfortunately, I am unable to attend. Thank you for the invitation. Please RSVP no later than March 22, 2002 Thanl, you for your support of the Collier County Education Foundation 2590 Golden Gate Parl~way · Suite ~0] o Naples. FL 34105 ' (941) 643-4755 · (941) mail@ccef-swfl.org * www. ccef-swfl.ori~. ~43-4/~'~ ~ ax COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO ATTEND FUNCTION(S) SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-410, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that attendance at the functions of fraternal, business, environmental, educational, charitable, social, professional, trade, homeowners, ethnic, and civic associations / organizations serves a valid public purpose, provided that said functions reasonably relate to Collier County matters. In accordance with Resolution No. 99-410, All Commissioners hereby requests that the Board of County Commissioners approve their auendance without cost at the following function / event: Function ' 4th Annua'... ore,tv,~ Jam Public To represe~-~'~ Collier CounW and interact with constituents and employees. Date of }~tn;ct/on / Event: April 13 ar, d 14. 2002 Cost~aluc $20.00 per ncket 2002 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE April 9th, 2002 FOR BOARD ACTION: 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: mo H:DalafFormat Clerk of Courts: Submitted for public record, pursuant to Florida Statutes, · Chapter 136.06(1), the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period: 1. Disbursements for March 9, 2002 through March 15, 2002. 2. Disbursements for March 16, 2002 through March 22. 2002. Minutes: 7. 10. 11. Bavst'orc Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board - Agenda for March 5, 2002. Radi~. i<t,:~d Beautification M.S.T.U. - Agenda for March 18.2002. MinuTes of February 19, 2002. Roac!v. ::', and Drainage M.S.T.U. - Agenda for March 15. 2002. Minutes of Fcbruary 22, 2002. Isles ,,:'< apri Fire/Rescue Advisory Board - Minutes of December 13. 200~. Worl::'orce Housing Adviso~ Co~i~ee - ~enda for March 4, 2002 Minutes of Febma~ 4, 2002. Collier County Pl~ng Co~ission - Agenda for March 7, 2002. Minutes of Januau 17, 2002 ~d Minutes of February 7, 2002. Hispani c Advisory Bo~d - M~ntes of November 29, 2002 Golden Estates L~d T~I Co~i~ee- Minutes of December 17, 2001 Pelica'.: Bay MSTBU Advisow Co~iaee - Agenda for M~ch 6, 2002, Minutes of Feb~ 6, 2002. Collier Coumy Me~opolim P~g ~mion- Agenda for Februar~ 15, 2002. Collic~' County Libr~ Ad~so~ Bo~d - Agenda ~ Febru~. 2~2. APR 09 200Z 12. 13. Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee - Agenda for March 8. 2002, Minutes of February 8, 2002. Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board - Minutes of January 24, 2002 14. Bayshore Beautification M.S.TU. -Agenda for March 13, 2002, Minutes of February 13, 2002. 15. Environmental Advisory Council - Agenda for March 6, 2002, Minutes of February 6. 2002. 16. Rura! lands Area Assessment Oversight Committee - Agenda for Febrt:',::",. 25. 2002, Minutes of February 4, 2002. 17. Vand.~ ~ii.: Beach M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee - Agenda for March 7, 2002. Xiinutes of February 7, 2002. 18. CoI:~ Jam: 23._ ~,: Character/Smart Growth Advisory Committee - Agenda for · 2002 and January 23, Minutes of January 9, 2002 and January 19. 1-75 Fe~- .n Gate Interchange Advisory Committee - Agenda for · 5. 2002. 20. 20(" ~.:tc Beautification Advisory Committee - Agenda for IVlarch 12. , ~utes of February 12,2001. H:Data~'ormm EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S RETENTION OF PROCESS SERVERS FOR THE COUNTY IN UPCOMING EMINENT DOMAIN ..... ~,SES FOR ROAD PROJECTS, EXEMPT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY FROM THE PURCHASING _ OLICY IF AND TO THE EXTENT THE PURCHASING POLICY IS APPLICABLE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN ANY NECESSARY RETENTION DOCUMENTS. OBJECTIVE: For the Board to authorize the County Attorney's retention of process servers to serve defendants in upcoming eminent domain cases for road projects, and exempt the County Attorney from the Purchasing Policy, if and to the extent the Purchasing Policy is applicable, and authorize the Chairman to sign any necessary retention documents. CONSIDERATIONS: Because road acquisition projects are on a short critical timeline, the County Attorney Office recommends that the Board exempt it from any potentially applicable Purchasing Policy procedures relating to the retention of process servers. The County Attorney Office recommends that the Board ratify and authorize its retention of the following process servers: 1) Ortino Investigations & Process Service; and 2) Bill Greenberg Special Services, Inc., to serve defendants in upcoming eminent domain cases for road projects. These process servers have been approved by the court system to issue service of process. They have also been utilized in the past by the County, have charged market rates, and have proven to be quick, efficient and reliable. An RFP process will bring several process servers under agreement in the future. FISCAL IMPACT: Attached are rate sheets for both companies. A large volume of summons will be served during the remaining fiscal year in Collier, Lee, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties. The costs for these fees will be paid from the Transportation Engineering and Construction Management Department, Fund ~"t4 for Goodlette-Frank Road (Impact Fee District 3) Cost Center 163650, Fund 331 Immokalee Road (Impact ze DistriCt 1) Cost Center 163650 and Fund 313 Livingston Roads (Gas Tax) Cost Center 163673. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board find it in the best interest of the County to authorize the County Attorney's retention of Onino Investigations & Process Service and Bill Greenberg Special Services, Inc. to serve defendants in upcoming eminent domain cases for road projects; exempt the County Attorney from the Purchasing Policy if and to the extent the Purchasing Policy is applicable and authorize the Chairman to sign any necessary retention documents. REVIEWED BY: ~,: j Heidi F. Ashton, Assistant County Attorney DATE: '> . : '~ ,/ c. -' - -'~ Ellen T. Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney DATE: APPROVED BY: 13~¢id C. Weigel, C0uUnty Attc~ey DATE: AG'I~DA ITEM .. No. C-C!.). APR 0 9 2002 FEOM : OEI PHONE NO. : Mar. 25 2002 12:lTPM P2 Ortino Investigations & Process Service Post Oiflce Box 10398 Naples. Florida 34101 (941) $53-4224 Facsimile (941) 353-1907 F'~it Our FYebaite at ~'W~. OR77NOPf. C0..¥[ Process Service Fee Schedule In-State Clients Area One: N~lm - C-~lgea ~_~. M~ C~-Saa Catlm Normal ~-vice 5 - 10 Woridn~ Priority Service 24 - 72 Hour Rush Service 24 Hours or Les~ Subpoenas $ 25.00 .- $ 50.00 $ 75.00 Summons :}5.00 75.00 125.00 Area Two: Subpoenas $ 45.00 $ 75.00 $125.00 Summons 65.00 100.00 150-00 Area Three: Faot~-s~=~l .~a~ Subpoenas $ 75,00 $100.00 $150.00 fr,a~ ~,~ ~wa~ Snmmons 100.00 125.00 200.00 ~--~ re: ~ce fe~ ~ed ~e ~e for t~ (3) ~~ ~ v~ ~u~ of t~ ~ (~ ~ng, ajfernoon, evening and or Saturday morning). A ~dlriona1 ammtpts conz'_/m te an adtEtional fe~ $ 10.00 S 20.00 25.0O 40.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 75.0O 75.00 100.0~ Normal 5-10 Day Sa~ice: Any ~ennce thtrt does not need to be attempted wirPan 3 - 5 days of reczipr. Priori~ 24 - 72 Hour Service: Any ser~c~ that has to be altem~ wittzm 24 to 72 hours of receipt. ~]zsh 24 ~our S~vi~' Any service zbat has to be ~ted within 24 ho~rs or less and service ar a sFecific rime. Hourly & M~leage: A~y service ti:at requires s]~ecia! fflTefflion artd thtrt ~foea' not frill will~tn t]Te tzbove listed guidelines. T'ms inahtdes service by surveillcrnce, service at a specific time and standby time. Our hour~y rtrle is $6O. OO per bzmr ~d $,50 per mi2e. ~Ye htme tz minimum ora mo-hour charge for ail hmtrty services. ~zyma~. ,4Il procr, sx is pre-~ayment only unless an account is established wHh ns. On all bitled payma~ is due upon receipt of invoice, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. ,ln~er~, zrt · --llowed by law will be charged to accounts more than 30 days past date. All process is served in accordance to Florida Statutes unless instructed otherwis~ F..f~mive September 1, 2001 m J APR 0 g 2002 BILL GREENBERG SPECIAL SERVICES, INC. A Licensed Investigation Agency ! License # A9600339 Main 18450 NE 2nd Avenue (Process Service & Sldp-Trace~ Miami, FL 33179 Tel: 305.77~.~43{ To{I Free: 800.654.000[ · Fax: 305.770.445[ Miami-Dade · Broward · Palm Beach County Researc~ PROCESS SERVICE INVESTIGATION LEGAL RESEARCH SKIP-TRACE PHOTOGRAPHY SURVF1LLANCE WITNESS STATEMENTS NOTARY (Public Records & Investigation Division Tel: 305.770.4437 Toll Free: 888.770.900~ Rasearch Fax: 800.770.449[ Web Site: www. bgss.con- E-mail: bill~bgss.co~ Regular Service (2-5 Days) Summons .................................................... $ 25.0C Subpoena ............. $ 20.0: Subpeona Records Custcd a~, . ' ' i .................................. $15.0C Subpeona Federal .............................................. $ 25.0¢ Subpeona Federal Reccrd~ Custodian ..................................... $ 20.00 Rush Service (As soon as poss?;!e - within 24 hours) Summons / Supcena .............................................. Special Rush (Same day) Summons / Subpoena ............................................ $ 70.00 Special Appointments for Sen, ico .......................................... $ 7o.0o Service of Summons / Subpoenc.~ (..~ Service of Summons / Subpoen~ OUTSIDE the state of Florida anywhere in the U.S.A. (Shipping Rush Service of Summon~ / Subpoena OUTSIDE the state of Florida anywhere in the U.S.A. (Shipping I AGENDA ITEM ,- APR 0 -2002 P~. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE AGREED ORDER AWARDING EXPERT FEES RELATIVE TO EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS OF PARCELS 169 AND 769 IN THE LAWSUIT ENTITLED COLLIER COUNTY V. FRED R. SUTHERLAND, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A SUTHERLAND PAINT HORSES, ET AL., CASE NO. 01-0756-CA (LIVINGSTON ROAD PROJECT NO. 60071 ) OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Agreed Order Awarding Expert Fees to be paid for appraisal services and engineering/planning services with respect to Parcels 169 and 769 in tr~, lawsuit entitled Collier Coun.ty v FRED R. SUTHERLAND, individually and d/b/a 3~ 7tTERLAND PAINT HORSES, et al., Case No. 01-0756-CA (Livingston Road ProjecT) On, May 31, 2001. an Ord. acquisition of road right-c,~-.. driveway restoration easem Ridge Road). On June sum of $14,100.00 for Par~ aking was entered in Collier County Circuit Court regarding the drainage, utility and maintenance easements and a temporary the Livingston Road Extension (Golden Gate Parkway to Pine I. Collier County deposited with the Registry of the Court the ,',0 and 769 in accordance with the Order of Taking. On January 22, 2002. ~ Judgrnem. To conclude tit has agreed to pay reas, engineering/planning fees Kenneth A. Jones, Esq. xx Agreed Order Awarding t ~ard of County Commissioners approved a Stipulated Final :~uer, pursuant 1o Section 73.091(1), Florida Statutes, the Count): appraisal fees in the amount of $462.50, and reasonable amount of $436.25 to Roetzel & Andress Trust Account, c/o :,,pect to Parcels 169 and 769, the terms of which are set out in the ~:'ees (attached as Exhibit "1"). C0,ISC AL IMPACT: ?u:: in the amount of $898.75 are available in the Transportation ~----"~'e~~i Fund. :',~ ,~.~rce of Funds are Impact Fees. GROWTH MANAGEM r ~ ' IMPACT: Management Plan for C]i~i ~,~ uc~ No. 53. Consistent with the Collier County Growth RECOMMENDATION: ~ ~at the Board of County Commissioners: 1. approve thc ::ed Order Awarding Expert Fees 2. approve thc; ,:mdimre of the funds as staled SUBM1TI~D BY: ~ -~(u . ~/c___.--._.~ Heid }". A~ton Ass ' ' County Attorney Date: ~0. ~ APR 0 9 2002 REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: · :V/~ V>:'t'-- Date: Dale A. Bathon, P.E. Principal Project Manager Transportation Engineering & Construction Management Nor~ ~eder, ,ddministrator Trans!ortation Division David C. Weigel County Attorney 2 AGENDA ITEM,,. NO. ~ APR 0 9 2002 ~te: 3/18/02 Time: 11:52 AM To: ~ 774-0225 Myers Fax P&ge: 003-004 03-1~,-D2 I~t:40 Frola-.(;ot~ier County Attorney Office 641 TT4 OZSE T-Z03 P.OOZ/OO3 F-2i~ llq AND FOR COl .~ ,rER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION CO1-T ;r'~ COUNTY, ~O~ a ~ ~b~v~ of ~: S~ of I~ T~E CIRCUIT COURT OF THE T~N'I'~'~'~I JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Petitioner, ~ 1~ SI~f~%~4D, individ,,sny and d/bla S~ PAINT HORS~S, ct C~¢ No.: 01-0756-CA Pzrc~l Nos.: 169 ,,~,~ 769 / AG~REED ORDER AWARDING EXPERT FEES T/-][IS CAUS]/, havin~ cern= bcf~rc the Court upon jo/ut motion of the parth'% Petitioner, COT.~-~. COUNTY, ~nd k~t, Fith"r) R. SIJTH]/~LA_ND d/b/,,' S~ PAINT HORSES, ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ Aw~in5 ~ F~, ~ Co~ b~ ~y ~ ~ ~e ~se~ it ~ h~by '~~~_~ P~ HOP~, ~e ~ ~ ~m P~o~, CO~-~.mR CO~, ~ ~n~ ~-~o ~d 50~00 ~ ~0) ~ ~~ s~c~ Four ~n~ Th~ nd ~100 ~olm ($43a~ ~ m~~l~i~i ~l ~ ~ ~t~P~ 169~ 769; ~dit h ~ .(30) ~ ~ me ~: of ~s ~ ~M ~ ~ of~ B~ of ~ A~NDA ITEM.. NO. ~ APR 0 9 20[}2 · te; 3/18/02 Time: 11:52 AM To: ~ 774-0225 Myers Fax P&~e: 004-004 Q3-14-0~ !~:40 From-Colli~r I;o.nt~ k~torn~x Otflc~ g41 Dollars ($898.75) to ROETZEL & ANDRESS Trust Account, c7o Kanneth A. lones, Esq., 2320 1;ixst Strut, Suite 1000, Fort Mlmr~ FL 33901, f~r pzop~ disburscmont of oxpex~ fees. DONI~ A/qD ORDERED thi_~ day of __, 2002, in Na~l~s, Collier Co~mty, T~d Brous.seau ~ Cotui Jud~ conformed copies to: .H~di F. Ashtlm, As~i~ Co~ Al:torney K__,~-~h A. lones, ~-~1- Tlm Parti~ h~reby ~dt)ular~ mud r~pectfi~y r~lU~t rl~i~ Court menmr th~ foregoing Alg~'d Ord~ Av, m~hn$ Expert F~s as ~o Parcel Nos. 169 and 769. · 2320 [~irst Strut s~pooo lw~n)l F. ASITfON, ESQ. ~lnri~a Bar No. 966770 COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 3301 ~T~i~i ~1/77~ - Tel~h~c AGENDA JTEM '. NO. ~ APR 0 it 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT IN GALLAGHER v. COLLIER COUNTY, CASE NO. 00-0565-CA-01, NOW PENDING'IN THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO WHICH THE COUNTY WOULD PAY $50,000 AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY WOULD BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SAID $50,000 SETYLEMENT WAS ARRIVED AT DURING A MEDIATION OF THE OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approves the settlement in Gailagher v. Collier County, Case No. 00-05f'5-CA-01, now pending in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida, Purse: ~ to which the County would pay $50,000 and ail claims against the County would be dismissed ~:',h prejudice. Said $50,000 settlement was amved at dunng a mediation of the mauer. CONSIDERATIONS: husband, were attending a p~ the second row of a bleache:' Anthem and the bleacher ste- usher came over and asked ~ be okay. Later that evening Recreation Department to ac~ with a broken coccyx. advising that she had som~_ During that time, the bleach:: repair. They were held for ~a%' 26, 1998, 59 year old Plaintiff, Barbara Gailagher and her ,: vent at Mackle Park in Marco Island, Florida. She was seated on the National Anthem began playing. She stood up for the National ~: causing plaintiff to fail to the ground landing on her buttocks. An as okay. She explained what had happened but thought she would · zame worse, so her husband called Dennis Gulley of the Parks & :~m of the accident. She later went to her doctor and was diagnosed ~ until six weeks later that Plaintiff wrote a letter to the County ~s problems from this accident and to put the County on notice. been held for examination and found to have been old and beyond ~mately one month, then dismantled and recycled. As a result of the Plaintifi-:. :. from the bleachers, she has sustained a broken coccyx, lateral foraminal stenosis at L4-5 :: .3-4, fight I.A radiculopathy, lumbar myofasclal syndrome, rotary lumbar dex~'oscoliosis, degc: : ~ve disc disease al L2-3, degenerative scoliosis, foraminal stenosis right L3-4 with disc extreme pain in lower back she has endured continuing needs assistance with her been substantially decreased blocks for pain managemem ,:'aminal stenosis right LA-5 moderate to severe, right sciatica and cbt leg. The Plaintiff aileges that since her fall from the bleacher, ,creasing pain, can no longer enjoy entertaining friends and family, old chores and, because of the recurring pain, her quality of life has ~i::r future medical expenses will include continuing quarterly epidural : :ted over her life expectancy, at a cost of $37,500. GROWTH MANAGE1VE? i'~ IPACT: None. FISCAL IMPACT: The ? budgeted and available in ~! result in a substantial saving award. ~nent offer reconnnended by staff mounts to $50,000. Funds are i:~sk Management Property and Casualty Fund. The settlement will · .~ture litigation costs, as well as the probability of a much higher jury - AGF_N.D~, I~'EM ~ NO. ~ APR 0 9 2002 pg._ /' RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a settlement with the principal terms set forth in this Executive Summary and authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute all necessary settlement documents. Prepared by: Assistant County Attorney Reviewed and Approved by: David C. ~V"~igel~' ~ County Attorney Reviewed and Approved by: She~X"~ Mediavilla Risk Manager Date: ~'~/.-~ h 2... H:BilFEaecu',ive Szwma~ary-C, alla~oher Case 2 AGENDA ITEM No./6 z._ .3~% APR 0 9 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT IN BETrENCOURT v. COLLIER COUNTY, CASE NO. 00-0283-CA, NOW PENDING IN THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO WHICH THE COUNTY WOULD PAY $150,000 AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY WOULD BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SAID $150,000 SETTLEMENT WAS ARRIVED AT DURING A MEDIATION OF THE MATTER. OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the settlement in Bettencourt v. Collier County, Case No. 00-0283-CA, now pending in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida, Pursuant to which the County would pay $150,000 and all claims against the County would be dismissed with prejudice. Said $150,000 settlement was arrived at during a mediation of the matter. CONSIDERATIONS: On January 18, 1998, plaintiff, Manuel Bettencourt, was walking on Beachwood Lake Drive in Collier County. While walking on said sidewalk, Plaintiff tripped over a one and one half to two inch elevation in the sidewalk. Unable to catch his fall, his full body hit the cement, with his left eye sustaining the brunt of the impact. It should be noted that, on the date of the fall, Mr. Bettencourt had had pre-existing right eye condition because of a 1981 eye laceration with visual acuity of 20/80 when wearing a contact lens and glasses. Therefore, he was almost legally blind in the right eye at the time of the fall. It was also his 66th birthday. After the fall, a fi'iend of his drove him to the emergency room where he saw an ophthalmologist who advised him that his left eye most likely had a raptured socket. The next day Plaintiff went to a specialist who advised him that he would be very lucky if they could save the left eye. On January 20, 1998, Plaintiffretumed to Canada where he has undergone three (3) surgeries for his left eye and it is anticipated that he will need a fourth surgery in order to save the eye. He now must rely on his right eye for his source of vision. He no longer can drive a car and his wife has to help him with the daily chores of living. He can no longer do any woodworking since he cannot see and, in fact, his wife has to help him in and out of the shower because once he removes his contact lens and glasses he is virtually totally blind. As to the sidewalk area in question, the elevation was one and one half to two inches which is, under the new standard, well in excess of an acceptable elevation. Plaintiff, Sofia Bettencourt, has a claim for loss of services. She now has to take care of her husband and perform many of the functions that he used to be able to do prior to the fall. This complicates her life even more since she is also now in bad health and she has even more trouble doing the things for her husband that he used to be able to do for himself. Based upon the fact that there was an unum~ly high elevation in the sidewalk coupled with a substantial and devastating injttry which resulted, $150,000 settlement for both the claims of Plaintiff, Manuel Bettencourt and Plaintiff, Sofia Bettencotm was reasonable under all of the circumstances presented at the mediation. Of course, said settlement is subject to Board approvz AGENDA ITEM Executive Sm' Manuel & Sofia Bettencoun Case No. 00-0283-CA GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. FISCAL IMPACT: The settlement offer recommended by staff amounts to $150,000. Funds are budgeted and available in the Risk Management Property and Casualty Fund. The settlement will result in a substantial savings of future litigation costs, as well as the probability of a much higher jury award. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a settlement with the principal terms set forth in this Executive Summary and authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute all necessary settlement documents. Prepared by: William E. Mountfo~t Assistant County Attorney Reviewed and Approved by: David C. WeTg~'l' z2 County Attorney Reviewed and Approved by: Mediavilla Risk Manager Date: H:Bill/F_.J~cut~ve Sm,m ~ y-Betencourt Case 2 AGENDA ITEM NO ){~ L. P'I~F~ /- u g. uuL. Pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZE THE MAKING OF AN OFFER OF JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000.00 TO RESPONDENTS, JOSEPH CALl AND SAMUEL MONTELLO, FOR PARCELS 4.3 AND 4.4 IN THE LAWSUIT STYLED COLLIER COUNTY V. JOSEPH C.4LI, ET AL., CASE NO. 89- 0987-CA. PROJECT NO. 73902. OBJECTIVE: To approve and authorize the making of an Offer of Judgment pursuant to 73.032 Fla. Stat. to Respondents, Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello, in the amount of $20,000.00 as full compensation for the condemnation of Parcels 4.3 and 4.4 in Collier County v. ~loseph Cali, et al., Case No. 89-0987-CA, East & South Sewer Improvement Project no. 73902. CONSIDERATIONS: On April 5, 1989, an eminent domain action was filed for the acquisition of property for the East & South Sewer Improvement Project. Parcels 4.3 and 4.4 were acquired for a perpetual non-exclusive utility easement and temporary construction easement. On June 14, 1989, an Order of Taking was entered in by the Circuit Court as to Parcels 4.3 and 4.4, and on June 29, 1989, the good faith estimate of value for these parcels was deposited into the Court registry, thereby vesting title in the parcels in Collier County. The Offer of Judgment, a copy of which is attached, offers the property owners of these Parcels, Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello, the sum of $20,000.00 as full compensation for the property taken, including any severance damages, business damages, damages to the remainder, costs to cure and interest. This figure takes into account the basis for the appraised value and the potential risks and costs in proceeding to trial. The making of the Offer of Judgment will require the property owners to carefully assess their claims for compensation. Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello have thirty days from the date of mailing the offer to accept. If Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello accept, the County will be required to deposit an additional $13,690.00 into the registry, and the total sum of funds on deposit, or $20,000.00, will be paid to Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello by Stipulated Final Judgment of the court. If Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello reject the offer, and fail to recover more than $20,000.00 for Parcels 4.3 and 4.4, either through settlement or jury verdict, the County will not be required to pay any costs incurred by Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello after the date of the offer's rejection. This would include any expert witness fees, such as appraisal fees. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed all considerations in making an Offer of Judgment and has calculated in good faith this offer of full compensation for the property interests taken. This office considers the terms of the Offer of Judgment to be reasonable. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $13,690.00 are not available for this specific project. A budget amendment is needed to transfer funds from Wastewater Capital Reserves to the East & South Sewer Improvement Project. The source of funds is sewer impact fees. AGENDA ITEM. NO. ~ APR O 9 2002 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 2. 3. 4. Approve the terms of the Offer of Judgment and authorize its service on Respondents, Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello; and Approve the necessary budget amendment; and Authorize $13,690.00 to be paid into the Registry of the Court in the event the Offer of Judgment is accepted by Joseph Cali and Samuel Montello; and Approve Stipulated Final Judgment based on the acceptance of the Offer of Judgment. SUBMITTED BY: F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney Date: REVIEWED BY: Roy i~-; ,knderson, P.E. Utilities Engineering Director Date: APPROVED BY: Ton' V'-idcs Public Utilities Interim Administrator Date: APPROVED BY: David C. Weigel ~ County Attorney Dale: 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ APR 0 9 2002 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A political subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, Vo JOSEPH CALl, et al., Case No. 89-0987-CA-01-TB Parcel Nos.: 4.3 and 4.4 Respondent. / TO: and OFFER OF JUDGMENT Joseph Cali 5429 Guadeloupe Way Naples, Florida 34119-9580 Samuel Montello 7320 St. Ives Way Naples, Flor/da 34104 Plaintiff, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, pursuant to Section 73.032, Flor/da Statues, and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442, does hereby make this binding offer ofjudgrnem in this action to the Respondents, JOSEPH CALI and SAMUEL MONTELLO for all compensation, including severance damages, business damages, costs to cure, together with the value of the taking, and any other claims of Respondents, JOSEPH CAIJ and SAM-LTEL MONTELLO, arising out of the taking of Parcel Nos.: 4.3 and 4.4, in the total amoum of Twenty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($20,000.00), which includes the amount of $6,310.00 which was deposited pursuanI to the Order of'raking dated June 14, 1989. A~-.NDA ITgM No. ,APR 0 9 2002 Pg. There are no non-monetary terms or other relevant conditions to this offer except that this offer does not include attorneys fees and costs. The construction plans and specifications for the project on which the offer is based have been previously and continue to be made available for the Respondent(s) review upon reasonable notice of such a request. Dated this day of ,2002. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY Harmon Turner Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 - Telephone (941) 774-0225 - Facsimile BY' HEIDI F. ASHTON Florida Bar No. 0966770 ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Offer of Judgmem has been furnished by U.S. Mail, to: Joseph Cali, 5429 Guadeloupe Way, Naples, FL 34119-9580, and Samuel Montello, 7320 St. Ives Way, Naples, Florida 34104 on this day of ,2002. HEIDI F. ASHTON, ESQUIRE 2 AGEN. D. A !TEI)4~ NO. ~ APR 0 9 2002 Pg. ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RZ-2001-AR-1625, ROBERT L. DUANE, AICP, OF HOLE MONTES, INC., REPRESENTING LEO J. FRAGIACOMO AND ANNELISE C. O'DONNELL, REQUESTING A REZONE FROM RMF-16 TO RSF-4 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 227 CAYS DRIVE, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS LOT 72, STELLA MARIS, IN PORT OF THE ISLANDS, IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners determine whether the requested rezone is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code and is in the best interest of the community. CONSIDERATIONS: This petition seeks to rezone a single lot from Residential Multi-family (RMF-16) to Residential Single-family (RSF-4). This petition is for a parcel less than 40,000 square feet in area. However, it complies with Section 2.7.2.12.1 of the Land Development Code because it involves an extension of a district boundary (RSF- 4 zoning to the south). The rezoning will not create an isolated zoning district. The number of dwelling units which may be permitted on the lot with the existing RMF-16 zoning is 3. If the lot is rezoned, only 1 dwelling unit could be permitted. A single-family home can, in many instances be a preferred neighbor as compared to a multi-family structure. Single-family homes generate more automobile trips per day, however: in this case, th~ density is being reduced from a possibility of 3 dwelling units to 1 dwelling unit. Therefore the number of daily trips should be reduced slightly. The infrastructure for the subdivision is in place; therefore the availability of adequate public facilities has already been addressed (A Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities will be applied for with the building permit). FISCAL IMPACT: This rezone by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on the County. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building pen'nits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element needed to maintain adopted levels of service for public facilities. This rezone will permit a building permit for a single-family home to be issued and the impact fees normally associated with a single-family home to be collected. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject property is designated Urban (Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict). Relevant to this petition, the FLUE acknowledges the existing Development Agreement pertaining to the Port of the Islands, and allows for zoning changes so long as "the overall residential density and commercial intensity does not exceed that permitted under zoning at time of adoption of this Plan." The subject site is zoned RMF-16; the proposed rezone to RSF-4 will result in a slight decrease in overall residential density at Port of the Islands. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed use and density for the subject site can be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The proposed use may be deemed consistent xvith the Future Land Use Element. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: There are no outstanding environmental issues associated with this petition. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: An Environmental Impact Statement was not required for this parcel, because it is under the size threshold, with no wetlands on site. Therefore, the Environmental Advisory Council did not hear this petition. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) heard this petition on March 7, 2002 and by a 7 to 0 vote, forwarded this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed rezone only affects one lot. It will result in a slight reduction in density and is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code. Therefore, Planmng Services staff recommended that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition RZ-2001-AR-1625 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. AP~ ~, ~ 2002 ./ PREPARED BY: F DR~ISCHL, AICP PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE REVIEWED BY: SUStaiN MURRAY, AICP CURRENT PLANNING DATE INTERIM PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR APPROVED BY: JOSE/PH K. SCHMITT COMMUNITY DEVELO! .// RZ-2001-AR-1625 DATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FEBRUARY 21, 2002 PETITION: RZ-2001-AR-1625, STELLA MARIS REZONE OWNER/AGENT: Agent: Robert L. Duane, AICP Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Owner: Leo J. Fraciacomo Annelise C. O'Donnell 231 Cays Drive Naples, FL 34114 REOUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to rezone a single lot fi.om Residential Multi-family (RMF-16) to Residential Single-family (RSF-4). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION. The properly is located m the Port of the Islands development, within the Stella Maris subdivision.. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject lot is bordered on the north by a multi-family building, and on the south by a single- family house. The property owners would like to build a single-family house on the lot:.,_but the R_MF- 16 district only permits multi-family dwellings and townhouses. ~--,~A ~xt~ .o., /7 _f4- APR 0 ZOO7 Section 2.7.2.12.1 of the Land Development Code states: No change in the zoning classification of property shall be considered which involves less than 40,000 square feet of area and 200 feet of street frontage except: where the proposal for rezoning of property involves an extension of an existing or similar adjacent district boundary; within the broader land use classification of "C" districts, "RSF" districts, "RMF" districts, wherein such rezone is compatible with, or provides appropriate transition from, adjacent districts of higher density or intensity. However, the requirement of 200 feet of street frontage shall not apply to rezone petitions that provide 80 percent or more affordable housing units. This petition is for a parcel less than 40,000 square feet in area. However, it complies with Section 2.7.2.12.1 because it involves an extension of a similar district boundary (RSF-4 is similar to the adjacent RSF-3 zoning to the south). The number of dwelling units which may be permitted on the lot with the existing RMF-16 zonine is 3. If the lot is rezoned, only 1 dwelling unit could be permitted. ~ SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Subject Parcel' Undeveloped; zoned RMF- 16 Surrounding: North: East: South: West: Multi-family building; zoned RMF-16 Cays Drive ROW Single-family house; zoned RSF-3 Branch of the Faka-Union canal GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY i The subject property is designated Urban (Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict). Relevant to this petition, the FLUE acknowledges the existing Development Agreement pertaining to the Port of the Islands, and allows for zoning changes so long as "the overall residential density and commercial intensity does not exceed that permitted under zoning at time of adoption of this Plan." The subject site is zoned RMF-16; the proposed rezone to RSF-4 will result in a slight decrease in overall residential density at Port of the Islands. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed use and density for the subject site can be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT. Staffs analysis indicates Ihat the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no historic/archaeological survey and assessment is required. AC,~r_N~A EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL~ TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: The proposed impact of this rezone on transportation, infrastructur.e, and the environment was reviewed by the applicable reviewing agencies and their comments have been incorporated into this Staff Report. ANALYSIS: The proposed rezone would make the lot similar to the lot to the south and does not create an isolated zoning district. A single-family home can, in many instances be a preferred neighbor as compared to a multi-family structure. Single-family homes generate more automobile trips per day, hmvever; in this case. the density is being reduced from a possibility of 3 dwelling units to 1 dwelling unit. Therefore the number of daily trips should be reduced slightly. The infrastructure for the subdivision is in place; therefore the availability of adequate public facilities has already been addressed (A Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities will be applied for with the building permit). ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: The Environmental Advisory Council did not hear this petition because an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was not required. An EIS was not required because the property does not meet the size threshold and there is nothing proposed which would have a substantial impact on environmental quality. PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION. The proposed rezone only affects one lot. It will result in a slight reduction in density and is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code. Therefore, Planning Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition RZ-2001-AR-1625 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. APR ~ .~ 200? PREPARED BY: ,scm., PRINC~AL PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DATE /~USAN MURRAY, AICP ~7~ DATE CURRENT PLANNING MA: '~ GER & INTERIM PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR APPROVED BY: /gISEPH K. S~:~ViITT (..frOSTY DEVELOP DiTE/ & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR Petition RZ-2001-AR- 1625 COLLIER COUNTY PLA' '<G COMMISSION: KENNETH L. ABERNATE' ' i~k-TURMAN g/currtmt/~eischl/rezones/cays/slaffreport %.'. ~ -AR-1625 APR $ 9 2007 REZONE FINDINGS PETITION RZ-2001-AR-1625 Section 2.7.2.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code i'equires that the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following, where applicable: Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Pro: The subject petition has been found consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Groxvd~ Management Plan. A more detailed description of this conformity is addressed in the S'~aff Report. Con: Evaluation n,:,~, applicable Summary Findin~o~. Tiqe proposed development is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of thc ,, :"ov,'th Management Plan. The existing land use pattern; Pro: The parcel is s~:r. iiur in size to the single-family parcel to the south. Con: Evaluation no: v,,,qicable. Summan, Findin?., The proposed land use is consistent with the existing and future land use pattern in the area. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; Con: The proposed rezone is from RMF-16 to RSF4 and will technically create an isolated district. Pro: Because the sin(zSe-family usage will be similar to the lot to the south, it will not be an unrelated distric: /7[4- APR [~ 3 2002 Summary Findings: The parcel will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts because the single-family usage will be similar to the lot to the south. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Pro: The district boundaries are logically drawn. The lot could support a multi-family structure. ~ Con: The lot is larger than the townhouse lots to the north, and slightly smaller than the single-family lots to the south. Summary Findings: The district boundaries are logically drawn, however; the rezoning would not create a zoning district, which is not compatible with its neighbors. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Pro: The property owner believes that the property could best be utilized as a single- family house. No other conditions have changed. .Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findinl~s: Changing conditions have not resulted in the submittal of this amendment. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; .Pro: The owner of the lot to the south had an expectation of a townhouse as a neighbor. The rezone would result in a single-family home as a neighbor. That would not adverselv affect living conditions in the neighborhood. ~ Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findinl~s: The proposed rezone will not have an adverse impact on ,the adjacent 'single-family neighborhood, because the rezone will result in a similar residence being built next door.. 2 APR O 9 2002 Se e e Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create Wpes of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. .Pro: Single-family homes generate more automobile trips per day, however; in this case, the density is being reduced fi.om a possibility of 3 dwelling units to 1 dwelling unit. .,Con: Single-family homes generate more automobile trips per day than multi-family dwellings. Summary Findings: Single-family homes generate more automobile trips per day, however; in this case, the density is being reduced fi.om a possibility of 3 dwelling units to 1 dwelling unit. Therefore the number of daily trips should be reduced slightly. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; Pro: The infrastructure for the project, including stormwater management, is constructed. ' Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summar3' Findings: This rezone will not affect the uses permitted. This subdivision was reviewed for drainage relationships and design and construction plans are required to meet County standards as a condition of approval. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; pro: The side yard requirement in the RSF4 district is 7.5 feet. Con: The side yard requirement in the RMF-16 district is ½ the building height with a minimum of 15 feet. Summary Findings: All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards of the zoning district in which it is located. The required side yard will be reduced, but is appropriate to the district, according to the Land Development Code. APR 0 5 2002 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; .Pro: This rezone will permit construction of a single-family house instead of a multi- family building. Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary. Findings: An appraisal of estimated future property values resulting fi.om a rezone from RMF-16 to RSF-4 was not required to be submitted. However, a single- family home adjacent to another single-family home does not usually adversely affect property values. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property, in accordance with existing regulations; Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findinl~s: Both adjacent properties are developed. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summat3, Findines: The proposed rezone complies wilh the Groxvth Management Plan. Because of this consistency, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Whether there are substantial reasons why the propertx, cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; ' Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findin£s: The property could support a multi-family structure. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the Count3.; .Pro: The proposed development complies with the GMP. APR 0 ~ 2002 15. 16. 17. .Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: The property is currently zoned RMF-16 and the rezone is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, therefore it is not out of scale with the neighborhood or the County. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County tor the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findint~s: There are many other single-family lots in the County. The petitioner owns this particular lot and wishes to build a single-family home. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: The subject property is a cleared, filled lot with no unusual characteristics that would restrict construction of a single-family home. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier Count~~ Gro~vth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collie'r Count3- Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: This subdivision has its infrastructure already in place. A Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities will be applied for with the building permit. 2002 HOLE MONTES RZ-2001-AR-1625 PROJECT #2001100059 DATE: 10/19/01 FRED REISCHL October 17, 2001 950 Eno:ore ~',¢',' Naples, Florida 34110 · Ptlone 941 2542000 · Fax: 941.254.2099 Mr. Fred Reischl Collier County Planning Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drivc Naples, FL 34104 Re: Lot 72, Ports ofth~ islands HM File No. 2001 r~ ,,.: Dear Mr. Reischl: As a follow up to our co:' ,,' :talon/pre-application meeting over the phone please find enclosed 15 copies of the applicati~ :-,ozone Lot 72 and comprising +/- 9,176 s.f. from RMF-16 to RS-4 residential in the Port o: -iands, south of U.S. 41, in Section 9, Township 52, Range 28. (See attached location m: ' ' The subject property ab,,, zoned RSF-3 to the sot:: .:ltl-family structure to the north and a developed single family lot The subject property c~: because the proposed R: zoned RSF-3 to the sour: "RSF" districls; as so noL ound consistent with Section 2.7.2.12.1 of the LDC. This is 'ning although not the same zoning district as the adjacent land · v be found consistent with the broader land use classification in - ect/on 2.72.1.2.1. The zoning request will number of dwellings alloy,. Also please be advised the Port of the Islands and Land Use Element, the under zoning at the time found consistent wilh this of this application will be :~crease the number of dwelling units, but rather it will reduce the the present RMF- 16 district from +/-4 dwelling units Io 1 unit. :~ of the Islands is subject to a Development Agreement between i lorida Department of Community Affairs. As noted in the Future ~ ~ sidential density and commercial shall not exceed that permitted ,pfion of the plan. Therefore, the proposed change of use may be m~ent and the Collier County Growth Management Plan. A cop), ided to them at the time of this submittal to the DCA. In closing, we trust you x, :md the proposed zoning application consistent with the Collier County Growth Manage,. Plan and applicable portions of the Collier County Land Development Code. A r~ ...... zbr a waiver from the requirement to prepare a T.I.S.'for the proposed rezoning is reque> :..: because the total number of dwelling units will not be increased. Also bemuse of the pla~: :,rare of the proposed development in an area develo_vi_n£ wid1 A~A ITE. M/~ OCT I 7 2001 W:x,2001L2001098~R.LD\Cover te:: - ]0t6.doc Nagtes · Fort Myers, Venice · £nglewo:,c APR O O 21102 Mr. Fred Reischl October 17, 2001 Page 2 of 2 residential uses a request for a waiver to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement is also requested. (See attached aerial photo.) Very truly yours, Hole Montes, Inc. Robert L. Duane, A.I.C.P. Senior Planner RLD/Iaa Enclosures Cc: Leo Fragiacomo Bernard Piawah W:~2001 ~2001098~RLD\Cover letter01 ] 016.doc APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: STANDARD REZONE Petition No.: Commission District: RZ-2001-AR-1625 PROJECT #2001100059 Date Petition Received: DATE: 10/l 9/01 FRED REISCHL Planner Assigned: ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF General Information: Name of Applicant(s) Leo J. Fragiacomo 8: Armelise C. O'Donnel Applicant's Mailing Address 231 Cars Drive City. Naples Slate Applicant's Telephone # 941-642-5805 Fax # Name of Agent Robert L. Duane Agent's Mailing Address 950 Encore Way City Naples Slate FL Agent's Telephone # 941-254-2000 FL 941-642-5146 Zip 34114 Firm Hole Montes Inc. Fax # Zip 34110 941-254-2099 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES/CLRCRENT PLANNING 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE-NAPLES, FL 34104 PHONE (941) 403-2400fFAX (941) 643-6968 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZON~ - 10/9g AGF. NDA II'E~ h ,,,,,.. APR O S 2002 P i Complete the follo~ving for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. (Provide additional sheets if necessary) Name of Homeowner Association: Stella Maris Association Mailing Address 12734 Kenwood Lane, Suite 49 Zip 33907 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address City __ City Ft. Myers__ State FL State ~ Zip Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address City State Zip Name of Master Association: Mailing Address State __ Zip Name of Civic Association: Mailing Address Cig, State Zip o Disclosure of Interest Information: ao If the property is owned fee simple by an INT)IVIDUAL, tenancy by the entire~'. tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Leo J. Fraciacomo 231 Cavs Drive. Naples. FL 34114 Annelise C. O'Donnell 231 Cavs Drive, Naples. FL 34114 Percentage of Ownership 50% 50% ..... /'7 b. If the properly is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers d stocr, aomers and the percentage of stock owned by each. $ A PR Ii g 2002 ! APPLICATION' FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE- 10/08 PA Name and Address, and Office Percentage of Stock Co If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of O~ership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Oamership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporatio~ partnership, or trust. APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/9~: AGE. N~A APR 0 200;' Name and Address go Date subject property, acquired [] leased [-'-] 1/20/98 Term of lease ~yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: _ and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date ho Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) I£request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum l" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre-application meeting_. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. 1£ questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section: __9__ Township: 52 Range: 28 Lot: 72 Block: Subdivision: Port of the Islands. Stella Marls Plat Book 2__~6 Page g: 26-27 Property I.D.#: 7489001708 Metes & Bounds Description: See attached survey ,Size of property: ,124__ft. X 74__ft. = Total Sq. Ft. +/- 9.176 Acres +/- 0.224 Address/general location of subject property 227 Cays Drive APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/98 APR 0 9 200? ~-GE~ OF I__~5/~ .,Adjacent zoning and land use: Zoning Land use N RMF- 16 Multi-family S RSF-3 _Sine;le Family_ E RMF- 16 Drainage Retention W RMF-16 Canal Does the o'amer of' ~he sub. ject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give conur'!cte legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, artacl, (.:~ separate page). Section: Lot: 'township: Range: Subdivision: Plat Book .,: r-:_ Property I.D.#: Metes & Bounc! "Sption: Rezone Reque,- district (s) to application is requesting a rezone from the -.5_ zoning district(s). Present Use of~i:, :,~perty: Vacant RSM- 16_ zoning Proposed Use (o:- ,: of uses) of the property: Sinele Family Evaluation Cri, Development C(~ and the Planmn~ shall be based narrative stalemc: noted below. Inc] Pursuant to Section 2.7.2.5. of the Collier County Land :::ff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission. ission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners :onsideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a .,cribing the rezone request with specific referenc~ to the criteria :~::y backup malerials and documentation in support of ~h~, 2~/~w_~- .APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC H~ ' .. ,~FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/98 APR 0 ;002 PAGE Standard Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 2. 7. 2.5. ) 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth management plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment O'ezonc; necessary. 6. Whether the prc?osed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood I~'7~ether the ]~rcf,~;.~cd change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create Opes o: ::',:'":c' deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because q£ peak volumes ~ ' :,.':,/ccted O,7~es of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction ]?.,:, ~ , r;Fthe development, or otherwise affect public sq£eO'. 8. Igrhether the ]~,'~ .:- ,, c'd change will create a drainage problem. 9. FFhether the ?'~'~',?, ~ d change will seriously reduce light and air to a~/acent areas. lO. Whether the p;'~L:;,,,,.,'cd change will seriously affect property values in the adjacenl area. ] l. 14rhether the prr>??,,;~'ed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacem pro,~:c rO' in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the ]w'W~oscd change will constitute a grant of special privitege to on individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. J 3. ~:hether there ~,','c substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zo 14. Whether the ciT:~t::c, suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the count),. 15. Whether it is i,::~ossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in district~ ~,,:'~¥ad3, permitting such use. IA-GZNO~ ITE~ /x l.mAPR O S 200;' APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARI\G FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10.f98 10. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree qf site alteration which would be requi(ed to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier Count),, Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. Iii, as amended 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety., and welfare. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions. however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year7 If so, what was the nature of that hearing? NO I1. Additional Submittal requirements: In addition to this completed application, the following shall be submitted in order for vour application to be deemed sufficient, unles< otherwise waived during the pre-applicati~)n meeting. A cop)' of the pre-application meeting notes; Pre application meeting held with Fred Reischel via telephone. If this rezone is being requested for a specific use, provide fifteen (15) copies of a 24" x 36" conceptual site plan [and one reduced 8'A" x 11" cop), of site plan], drawn to a maximum scale of I inch equals 400 feet, depicting the £ollowing [Additional copies of the plan ma,',' be requested upon completion of staff evaluation for distribution to the Board and various advisor5' boards such as the Environmental Advisory, Board (EAB), or CCPC]; all existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof. · provisions for existing and/or proposed ingress and egress (including pedestrian ingress and egress to the site and the structure(s) on site), all existing and/or proposed parking and loading areas [include matrix indicating required and provided parking and loading, including reqaired parking for the disabled], · required yards, open space and preserve areas, · proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of ex/sting mility services to the site), proposed and/or existing landscaping and buffering as may be Count),', PAG] APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/9,~ A~Fr_.NO.~ ITEI~ ^ .o APR 0 9 2002 C o e o An architectural rendering of any proposed structures. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section 3.8. of the Land Development Code (LDC), or a request for waiver if appropriate. Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within the previous twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, shall be submitted. Said aerial shall identify plant and/or wildlife habitats and their boundaries. Such identification shall be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System. Additionallv. a calculation of the acreage (or square feet) of native vegetation on site, by area, arid a calculation and location(s) of the required portion of native vegetation to be preserved (per LDC Section 3.9.5.5.4.). Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments and sketches); A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), unless waived at the pre-application meeting; A historical and archeological survey or waiver application if property is located within an area of historical or archaeological probabiliD, (as identified at pre- application meeting); An3' additional requirements as ma3' be applicable to specific conditional uses and identified during the pre-application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or federal permits. APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/9~, AGENDA ITE~ APR 0 9 2002 PAG£ 8 OF 15 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT (TIS): A TIS is required unless waived at the pre-application meeting. The TIS required may be either a major or minor as determined at the pre-application meeting. Please note the following with regard to TIS submittals: MINOR TIS: Generally required for rezone requests for property less than 10 acres in size, although based on the intensity or unique character of a petition, a major TIS may be required for petition of ten acres or less. MAJOR TIS: Required for all other rezone requests. A minor TIS shall include the following: Trip Generation: Annual Average Daily Traffic (at build-out) Peak Hour (AADT) Peak Season Daily Traffic Peak Hour (PSDT) Trip Assigmnent: Within Radius of Development Influence (RDI) Existing Traffic: \Vithin RD1 AADT Volumes PSDT Volumes Level of Sen'ice (LOS) 4. hnpact of the proposed use on affected major thoroughfares, including any anticipated changes in level of service (LOS). An3, proposed improvements (to the site or the external right-of-way) such as providing or eliminating an ingress/egress point, or providing turn or decel lanes or other improvements. Describe any proposal to mitigate the negative impacts on the transportation system. For Rezones Only: State how this request is consistem with the applicable policies &the Traffic Circulation Element(TCE) of the Groa~ah Management Plan (GMP), including policies 1.3, 1.4.4.4. 7.2 and 7.3. ' · A Major TIS shall address all of the items listed above (for a Minor TIS, and shall also include an analysis of the following: - 1. Intersection Analysis 2. Background Traffic 3. Future Traffic Through Traffic Planned/Proposed Roadway Improvement Proposed S~hedule (Phasing) of Development APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/9:q 0 9 2002 ~11,.,, 6:24 . PAGE 9 OF 15 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT (TLS) STANDARDS: The following standards shall be used in preparing a TIS for submittal in conjunction with a conditional use or rezone petition: .Trip Generation: Provide the total traffic generated by the project for each link within the project's Radius of Development Influence (RDI) in conformance with the acceptable traffic engineering principles. The rates published in the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report shal~l be used unless documentation by the petitioner or the County justifies the use of alternative rates. Trip Assignment: Provide a map depicting the assignment to the network, of those trips generated by the proposed project. The assignment shall be made to all links within the RDI. Both annual average and peak seasonal traffic should be depicted. 3. Existing Traffic: Provide a map depicting the current traffic conditions on all links within the RDI. The AADT, PSDT, and LOS shall be depicted for all links within the RDI. 4. Level of Service (LOS): The LOS of a roadway shall be expressed in terms of the applicable Collier County Generalized Daily Service Volumes as set forth in the TCE of the GMP. 5. Radius of Development Influence (RDI),' The TIS shall cover the least of the following two areas: an area as set forth below; or. the area in which traffic assignments from the proposed project on the major thoroughfares exceeds one percent of the LOS "C". Land Use Distance Residential 5 Miles or as required by DRI Other (commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.) 0 - 49, 999 Sq. Ft. 2 Miles 50,000 - 99, 999 Sq. Ft. 3 Miles 100,000 - 199, 999 Sq. Ft. 4 Miles 200,000 - 399, 999 Sq. Ft. 5 Miles 400,000 & up 5 Miles In describing the RDI the TIS shall provide the measurement in road miles from the proposed project rather than a geometric radius. APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/98 Intersection Analysis: An intersection analysis is required for all intersections within the RDI where the sum of the peak-hour critical lane volume is projected Io exceed 1,200 Vehicles Per Hour (VPH). A~_NDA ITEM Pi APR 0 ~ 200? Back~round Traffic: The effects of previously approved but undeveloped or partially developed projects which ma3' affect major thoroughfares within the RDI of the propose~ project shall be provided. This information shall be depicted on a map or, alternatively, in a listing of those projects and their respective characteristics. Future Traffic: An estimate of the effects of traditional increases in traffic resulting from potential development shall be provided. Potential development is that which may be developed maximally under the effective Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and the Collier County Land Development Code. This estimate shall be for the projected development areas within the projects RDI. A map or list of such lands with potential traffic impact calculations shall be provided. Through Traffic: Al a minimum, increases in through traffic shall be addressed through the ),ear 2015. Thc methodology used to derive the estimates shall be provided. It max- be desirable to inclen, any additional documentation and backup data to support the estimation as 10. Planned/Proposed Roadway Improvements: All proposed or planned roadway improvements loc'.' ,,vi~hin the RDI should be identified. A description of the fundine commitments sh~ , be included. 11. Proiect Phasin.~y' improvements. impacts of a pr~ may be made a a project phasing schedule is dependent upon proposed roadway ~ng schedule ma3' be included as part of the TIS. If the traffic mitigated through a phasing schedule, such a phasing schedule of any approval. TIS FORM RVB/RJM 10/17/97 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HL FOR STANDARD Rt~i~ONE - 10/98 APR 0 .o 21}02 PAGE I I OF 15 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST NAME OF APPLICANT: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY Naples Leo Fragiacomo & Annelise C. O'Donnel 231 Cays Drive STATE FL ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): Naples~FL 34114 ZIP 34114 227 Cars Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section: 9 Lot: 72 Plat Book 26 Metes & Bounds l)cscription: Township: 52 Range: 26 Bloc i,: __ Subdivision: Stella Maris~ Port of the Islands Page#: 26-27 ProperD'I.D.#:74890001724 See attached survey (GPD capacity). ~. SEPTIC SYSTE31 TYPE OF SEXVAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system): a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM [~ b. CITY UTILI'I ~' SYSTEM ~ FRANCHISEI) UTILITY SYSTEM [] PROVIDE NAME Port of the Islands Communitv Improvement District PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT ~ TO BE SERVED:One Single Famih? Reside~ ce &P~ 7. TOTAL POPULATION .APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEAI~.IN,% ['OR STANDARD REZONE - 10/98 Pi;. PAGE 12 OF 15 TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED: a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM 1~. CITY UTILITY ~YSTEM c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM [] PROVIDE NAME Port of the Islands Community Improvement District d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (VqELL) ~-] ' 10. 11. 12. PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS: A. WATER-PEAK 924 GPD AVERAGE DAILY 308 GPD Avg. Demand B. SEWER-PEAK 960 GPD AVERAGE DAILY 240 GPD Avg. Demand IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED: No NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of effluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used. then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County, Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities wdthin the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the Count-,' Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicabl~. the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utilir,- easements for serving the water and sewer systems. STATEMENq' OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived or othem, ise provided for m the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other ;ban the Count5,', a statement from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to sen,e the project shall be provided. Utilily Provision Statement RJM 10/17/97 ,APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/98 PAGE APR 0 9 2002 13 OF 15 STANDARD REZONE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PACKET~ APPLICATION RE Q UIREMENTS 1. Completed Application 2. Copy of Deed(s) and list identifying Owner(s) and all Partners if a Corporation 3. Completed Owner/Agent Affidavit, Notarized 4. Pre-application notes/minutes # OF COPIES REQUIRED 15 5. Conceptual Site Plans 2 6. Environmental Impact Statement- (ELS) 7. Aerial Photograph - (with habitat areas identified) 4 8. 4 10. Historical & Archaeological Survey or Wain,er Application 11. Copies of State and/or Federal Permits 12. Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s) 13. Application Fee, Check shall be made payable to Collier Coun ,ty Board of Commissioners Other Requirements - 15 2 2 15 15 4 4 4 4 4 N/A held via telephone NOT REQUIRED $ 2105.00 4 4 X X 14. Completed Utility Provisions Statement (with required attachments and sketches) Traffic Impact Statement - (TLS) X X As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information ma3, result in the delay of processing this petition. Agent/Applicant Signature APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 10/9~ · Dat~ PA APR 0 9 2002 R ol~t & M ~ G e~un~ 235 Cays Drive N~p~s, Flotilla34114~ P~~s_ ~ 941 -389-1266 941 -389-9390 CeI1-941-?77-7717 Fax- 941-389-9391 February 15th 2002 Mr. Fred Reischl Prin. Planner Collier County, Florida Ref: RZ 2001-AR 1625 Lot 72 Port of the Islands Dear Mr. Reischl, we Just wanted you to know that/wholeheartedly agree to the above re- quest to rezone the above lot to single. It mill be a welcomed add ition to our neighborhood. Thank You for any and all considerations /T he petitioner. J~-- ru, urs, ?~/ APR 0 ~ 2002 February 16,2002 Collier County Government Planning Services Department Naples, Florida 34104 RE: RZ-2001-AR-1625 o 227 CaysDrive Attn: Fred Reischl - Principal Planner Dear Sir, I wish to express my accc:,::: ,cc of the above referenced Property change in Zoning from 1~i.' 't, to RSF-4 Described as Lot 72, Islands, Naples, Florida. Yours truly, AC~N, DA ITE~ APR 0 9 2002 ORDINANCE NO. 02 - AN ORDINANCE AMEN'DING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLiER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLiER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 2809S BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COLLiER COUNqr~2', FLORIDA. FROM RMF-16 TO RSF-4; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert L. Due:r:. A!CP. oI Hole, Montes, Inc., representing Leo J. Fragiacomo and Annelise C. O'Donm~'.i. ~'etifioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herei:'., dcs:ribed real property. NOW. THEREFORE. BE 17 ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLiER (~ '~ '(TY. FLORIDA. that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification e:: . :~,i property as more particularly described by Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporate(! i-'. reierence herein, and located in Section 9, Township 52 South, Range 28 East, Collier Co~::::.. Fiorida. is changed from RMF-16 to RSF-4 and the Official Zomng Atlas Map number:2 2~09S. as described in Ordinance 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code. ~ i~.:'~,'~ amended accordingly. The herein described real property is the same for which the rezc.::~ ~s hereby approved. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become e~tc. cuve upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED bx the Board of County Commissioners ot Collier County, Florida. this da) o: ,2002. APR 0 9 2002 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTTy COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AN-D LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Matjorie ~i~. Student ' Assistant County Attorney APR 0 9 2002 RZ-2001-AR-1625 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 72, Stella Maris, as recorded in Plat Book 26, Pages 26 and 27 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida