The URL can be used to link to this page

DSAC Agenda 12/02/2015DSAC 'I Meeting December 2, 2015 3:00 PM 280 N. Horseshoe Drive Growth Management Department DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA December 2, 2015 3:00 p.m. Conference Room 610 NOTICE: Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts the time. Speakers are required to fill out a "Speaker Request Form," list the topic they wish to address, and hand it to the Staff member seated at the table before the meeting begins. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman, and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation before commenting. During discussion, Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker. Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please leave the room to conduct any personal business. All parties participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules of Order, and wait to be recognized by the Chairman. Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made. Call to Order - Chairman II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of Minutes from November 4, 2015 IV, Public Speakers V. Staff Announcements /Updates A. Code Enforcement Division update — [Danny Condomina] B. Public Utilities Department update — [Tom Chmelik or designee] C. Growth Management Department Transportation Engineering Division & Planning Division updates — [Jay Ahmad or designee] D. Collier County Fire Review update — [Shawn Hanson andlor Shar Hingson] E. North Collier Fire Review update — [Eloy Ricardo] F. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update — [Ken Kovensky] G. Development Review Division update — [Matt McLean] VI. New Business A. Sub- Contractor sheets, Master sub forms for developments, Master sub list form for permits, and new inspection codes [Jon Walsh] B. Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis [Joe Bellone] C. Expedited Permitting for Target Industry Economic Development Projects [Bruce Register] D. Architecture and Site Design Standards LDCA review & vote [Jeremy Frantz] E. Report from DSAC -LDR Conservation Collier subcommittee to forward recommendation to the BCC amending LDC Section 3.05.07.1-1.1.f.iii. alternative off -site native vegetation retention requirements may be met by monetary payment or by land donation [Richard Henderlong] VII. Old Business VIII. Committee Member Comments IX. Adjourn Next Meeting Dates January 6, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm February 3, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm March 2, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm April 6, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm May 4, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm Page 1 of 1 November 4, 2015 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, November 4, 2015 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management Department Building, Conference Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Chairman: William J. Varian Vice Chairman: Blair Foley David Dunnavant James E. Boughton Clay Brooker Dalas Disney Chris Mitchell Robert Mulhere Mario Valle Stan Chrzanowski Norman Gentry Marco Espinar Ron Waldrop Laura Spurgeon DeJohn Jeremy Sterk ALSO PRESENT: Jamie French, Deputy Department Head Judy Puig, Operations Analyst, Staff Liaison Trinity Scott, Manager, Transportation Planning Dale Fey, North Naples Fire Danny Condomina, Code Enforcement Matt McLean, Manager, Development Review Rich Long, Plans Review and Inspections Manager Amy Patterson, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Jerry Kurtz, Stormwater Planning Kim Grant, Director, Community and Human Services November 4, 2015 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording from the Collier County Growth Management Department — Contact Mr. Evy Ybaceta at 239 -252 -2400. I. Call to Order - Chairman Chairman Varian called the meeting to order at 3:00pm IL Approval of Agenda Mr. Foley moved to approve the Agenda subject to adding item VI D — City View contract update. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 12 - 0. III. Approval of Minutes from October 7, 2015 Meeting Mr. Disney moved to approve the minutes of the October 7, 2015 meeting as presented. Second by Mr. Dunnavant. Carried unanimously 12 - 0. IV. Public Speakers None Mr. Where and Mr. Gentry arrived at 3: 05pm V. Staff Announcements/Updates A. Code Enforcement Division update — [Danny Condomina] Mr. Condomina provided the report "Collier County Code Enforcement Department Blight Prevention Program - Cumulative Code Enforcement statistics - 712009 — 10129115 " for information purposes. B. Public Utilities Division update — [Tom Chmelik or designee] None C. Growth Management Department/Transportation Engineering and /or Planning — [Jay Ahmad or designee] Ms. Scott reported: • US41 /Collier Blvd. Intersection — substantially complete. • Green Blvd. to Golden Gate — 25 percent complete. • Golden Gate Blvd — clearing and grubbing underway. • Immokalee Road/951 Intersection - surface improvements going out to bid. • Golden Gate Blvd. — 201h to Everglades Blvd. — design for Vanderbilt Road Ext out to 8111 underway (2020 — 2021 project). • MNppoorwill/Pine Ridge Intersection - realigning turn lanes. • Pine Ridge/US 41- FDOT project improving turn lanes. D. County Fire Review update — [Shar Hingson and /or Shawn Hanson] None E. North Collier Fire Review update — [Eloy Ricardo] Dale Fey reported the Department is keeping pace with plan reviews. OA November 4, 2015 F. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update [Ken Kovensky] Mr. Long submitted the "Collier County October 2015 Monthly Statistics" which outlined the building plan and land development review activities. He noted 19,000 inspections were completed in October. The Division continues to utilize outside sources like NOVA to meet the demand but now have a total of 42 inspectors on Staff. G. Development Review Division update [Matt McLean] Mr. McLean reported: • The Staff position for Architectural review has been filled. • The Staff position for Landscape review is still open. • There is a position open for a site plan reviewer. • He is convening a Task Force to study residential plan review requirements and a Member should contact Staff if they are interested in participating. VI. New Business A. Reducing peak stormwater discharge rates in additional basins (sub- basins) [Jerry Kurtz] Mr. Kurtz and Emilio Robau presented the Power Point "Collier County Additional Basin Restricted Allowable Discharge Rates — Presentation to DSAC, November 4, 2015. " He noted: • The item is intended to provide an update on the proposed changes in discharge rates for certain areas of the County. • He anticipates 1 — 2 more meetings with the Committee before finalizing the proposal. • Since the previous meeting where he presented the proposal he met individually with Members Foley, Chrzanowski, Mitchell and David Willems of Waldrop Engineering to garner input on the proposal. • He continues to prepare an economic impact analysis for the lands affected by the proposed changes. • The concept is supported in the County's Watershed Management Plan and by the South Florida Water Management District. • The concept is to limit the peak discharge rates in 16 existing basins in order to ensure the existing canals (which capacity cannot be enlarged) have the capacity to handle future development in these areas. • Single family lots in Golden Gate Estates (less than 5 acres) would not be impacted by the changes in the proposed discharge rates as they are exempt from permitting requirements. • The new requirements would primarily affect commercial development and large residential developments. • An analysis has been completed on the impact of the proposed decrease in discharge rates for a 12 acre commercial project which yielded a finding the site would need to be elevated approximately 0.2' (two tenth of a foot) higher than that required under the existing requirements. • A cost estimate for the additional fill material and changes in side slopes is being developed however a determination has been made the materials (size and amount of pipe, catch basins, etc.) required to develop the site would remain unchanged. • Options such as altering the side slopes required from 4:1 to 3:1, changing requirements for parking lot designs, etc. could be considered to offset any increased construction costs. 3 November 4, 2015 An analysis of a 100 acre residential site could be completed if the County wants to expend further funds. Mr. Robau opined the results would most likely be similar to that of the 12 acre commercial site analysis. The benefits of the proposals include improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by SFWMD and County operated canals, enhanced groundwater recharge potential, restored hydrology and wetlands hydroperiod, water quality improvement of receiving waters, reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries, gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting ( SFWMD and County). Mr. Valle arrived at 3: 55pm Under Committee discussion the following was noted: • Concern the requirements have not been implemented in the Land Development Code. — Staff noted a proposal is to request the State to allow the County to remove the requirements from the GMP and relocate them to the LDC. • Concern the requirement to increase the amount of stormwater retained on site will elevate the water table and create additional FEMA requirements for elevating infrastructure and homes. • Subsurface systems are currently allowed but are expensive and generally used in the urban areas where land values are much greater than non urban areas. • How would redevelopment of a site be treated, would they be required to meet the new standards and how would rights be vested for pre - existing uses (i.e. permitted but not yet built)? - Mr. Robau reported that has yet to be determined but one concept may be to set a threshold on the extensiveness of the renovation (i. e. 100 percent demolition reconstruction vs. 25 percent site impact). • A review of the "bleed down" rates should be conducted as it appears the 0.04cfs discharge rate for some design criteria cannot meet the required threshold. The Committee determined an analysis of a 100 acre residential site is not required based it is likely the largest impacts will be to high density, lower acreage commercial sites. Staff reported they would return to the Committee with an update in the future. B. Incentive Review Table Summary 2015 [Kimberley Grant] Ms. Grant and Stephen Hruby (Chairman of the Affordable Housing Committee) presented the "Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report" for information purposes. She noted: • The Report was prepared at the direction of the BCC and is updated every three years. • It includes a list of current and proposed incentives with recommendations on their priority and if existing ones should be maintained. • The item is scheduled to be heard at the December 8, 2015 BCC meeting. • One concept being considered is establishment of a Essential Service system to aid those employees in the area that provide these services (Emergency Medical Services, Firefighters, Hospital Staff, Home Health Care, etc.) in fording housing. The Committee noted: 4 November 4, 2015 The incentives revolve around providing funds for housing while it would be more beneficial to seek avenues to reduce the costs of development. Those in the industry have a tendency to search out economic opportunities such as exemptions from impact or other fees, "paybacks" for soft costs (design, engineering, permitting, etc.) for projects as opposed to utilizing programs which require the solicitation of funds. Any requirements to provide affordable housing in new developments should have highly flexible opportunities to meet these goals (monetary donations for use of funds for projects in more desirable areas as opposed to building on site, etc). Mr. Mitchell left at 4:35pm • Concern Collier County generates funds from real estate transfers that are allocated to a State Program for housing that is primarily directed to other areas. Mechanisms should be developed to ensure the County is allowed to retain their fair share of proceeds raised. • Consideration should be given to promoting micro housing which would reduce the requirement for large tracts of land to provide affordable housing. This would especially be beneficial for infill parcels and aid in reducing sprawl. • A review of the requirements for allowing rentals of guest houses should be undertaken given there is a large supply in the Golden Gate Estates area restricted from this type of use. — Ms. Grant noted one concern is how to regulate this activity given the high potential for use of the facilities for short term housing for seasonal residents and visitors to the area. • It is critical to ensure all varieties of housing opportunities, exist in the region including opportunities for the workforce as potential or existing employees may choose to locate to another area when seeking employment. Mr. Hruby concluding noting without the availability of adequate workforce housing, a crisis will develop creating severe economic consequences for the County as companies in the future may not locate to the area, and the existing ones may not be able to adequately Staff their operations and move elsewhere or shutdown completely due to the financial impact created by the lack of housing. Mr. Waldrop left at 4: 55pm The Committee queried on any input required for Staff on the Report. Ms. Grant reported she will notify the Board of County Commissioners the item was reviewed by the DSAC and relay the comments generated today to the Commissioners. C. Discuss contractor form, cancellation form, authorization form [Jon Walsh] Mr. Walsh provided the following updated forms for information purposes: "Change of Contractor, " "Cancellation Form " and "Authorization Form. " D. City View Software Support Update Mr. French presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners (Board) waives competition and approves the Software Maintenance Agreement for a five year period for a total amount of $1,221,995.02 with N. Harris Computer Corporation for the City View software application" for consideration. The contract is for unlimited full vendor November 4, 2015 software technical support for the firm that developed the City View software and includes two on- site visits per year. The company is located in British Columbia, Canada and has agreed to service Collier County beginning at 4.00am Pacific Time in order to accommodate the work start time of 6:30am for some County employees. Mr. Disney moved to recommend tlae Board of County Commissioners (Board) waives competition and approves the Software Maintenance Agreement for a five year period for a total amount of $1,221,995.02 with N. Harris Computer Corporation for the City View software application. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Carried unanimously 13 — 0. VII. Old Business None VIII. Committee Member Comments Mr. Foley recommended consideration be given to convening a Subcommittee to review County requirements for redevelopment of areas through the deviation process. Mr. Mulhere recommended: 1. A review of the Fire Review fee schedule be conducted, to ensure there are not fees charged for services not required to be provided during plan reviews. 2. Staff reviews the number of copies of information required for applications submittals. 3. Staff reviews the process for storing versions of electronically submitted applications on CD's. The Committee noted items 2 and 3 could be addressed by the Task Force outlined by Mr. McLean in item Y. G. IX. Adjourn Next Meeting Dates December 2, 2015 GMD Conference Room 610 -- 3:00 pm January 6, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm February 3, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610 — 3:00 pm There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Chair at 5:23PM. COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chairman, William Varian G November 4, 2015 These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on as presented , or as amended Collier County Code Enforcement Division Blight Prevention Program Cumulative Code Enforcement statistics 7/2009 - 11/22/2015: Amount of Fines Waived (BCC, CEB, OSM) since July 2009 1 $30,326,632.21 Department Performance Statistics FY16 i Week 4 Week Cumulative 11/16/15 - 11/22/15 10/26/15 - 11/22/15 Number of Code Cases Opened 204 728 1,285 Number of Educational Patrol Visits 78 429 990 Number of Code Case Property Inspections 502 2,179 4,191 Number of Cases Closed with Voluntary Compliance 32 184 351 Number of Community Meet and Greet events 4 9 18 Number of Community Clean -up Events 1 3 5 Number of Abandoned Home Sweeps 1 4 7 Number of Other Sweeps 0 2 5 Code Enforcement Board and Special Magistrate Orders 0 34 49 Number of Liens Filed 0 45 45 Number of Nuisance Abatements Processed 7 70 140 Amount of Fines Waived (BCC, CEB, OSM) $0.00 $1,202,680.13 $2,254,645.13 New Bankruptcy Filing Notifications 0 0 0 Number of Bankruptcy Documents Received 0 4 12 Number of Cases Affected by Bankruptcy 4 4 3 Number of Requests for Property Payoff Requests 9 44 71 Number of Requests for Property Lien Searches 263 764 1,301 Number of open code cases included in Lien Search Results 8 39 54 Number of Cases Open due to Lien Search 0 0 0 Number of Permits Issued: Garage Sale, Recreational Vehicle 63 230 387 Number of Citations processed from DAS, PU, PR, SO, & CE 89 275 442 Average Time from Complaint to Completion of Initial Inspection 1.5 1.5 1.5 Average Number of Code Cases Per Investigator 45 43 38 Open Cases by District Golden Gate —180 East Naples — 248 Immokalee — 239 Golden Gate Estates —170 North Naples — 249 Total Open Cases -1,086 For period of: 11/16/15 - 11/22/15 Report by Case Type Animal —1 Accessory Use --1 Commercial - 0 Land Use- 14 Noise — 3 Nuisance Abatement -19 Occupational License — 5 Parking Enforcement -1 Property Maintenance — 8 Protected Species - 0 Right of Way -3 Sign — 0 Site Development —13 Snipe Sign - 122 Temporary Land Use - 0 Vehicle —10 Vehicle for Hire -0 Vegetation Removal — 4 Total - 204 Complaint Reported by: 1 Week 4 Week Since BCC policy 3/12/13 11/16/15- 11/22/15 10/26/15- 11/22/15 0 5 313 Elected Official Anonymous accepted 0 0 81 Anonymous not accepted 4 6 814 pursuant to BCC policy Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report October 2015 Highlights • Cases opened: 697 • Cases closed due to voluntary compliance: 198 • Property inspections: 2,539 • Education patrol visits: 718 • Lien searches requested: 747 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Trends Cases opened per Month -- It �r v v �t It -t Ln in Ln Ln u) vi 0 Ln Ln Ln > U C -0 O. T C 00 Q U f0 4J f0 Q. a U z o- LL 2i a g' a UI o Z o LL 2 a 2 -, ¢ �, o Code Inspections per Month Ln LO 3000 � �.. . N N N N ^ ^ N N I� � . Total Code Cases by FY 12000 10000 I 8000 10573 -- — 9026 8319 6000 5839 4000 2000 "697 0 _ -_- FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 7000 ( 6391 6417 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 I 1000 0 FY12 FY13 Irigin of Case • Code Div. Initiated • Complaint Initiated Community Caretaking List Monthly Totals i 1200 I k 1 - .< __ 336 361 FY14 FY15 FY16 Irigin of Case • Code Div. Initiated • Complaint Initiated Community Caretaking List Monthly Totals 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 m %t d' d d eF d o Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln o Ln Ln Ln Ln � c M C c ao a c o C M do a > CU v ca a ro Q) 0 O cV M I- '� � m = -, = ai o a V o z n a g -, a (n O z Dec -13 an 14 Feb -14 Ma 14 Apr -14 Ma 4 Jun -14 Jul- 14 Aug -14 Sep -14 Oct -14 Nov -14 Dec -14 an- 15 Feb -15 Ma 15 Apr -15 Ma 15 Jun -15 Jul- 15 Aug -15 Sep -15 Oct -15 No -15 Total 104 109 104 989 927 881 805 756 690 591 581 539 509 463 425 410 386 379 415 400 387 382 367 342 Collier C014Hty Growth Management Department Building Plan Review & Inspection Division MASTER PLUMBING SUBCONTRACTOR AFFIRMATION To be completed by the qualifier working under the Primary Contractor. Only originals will be accepted. It is my responsibility as a plumbing contractor to verify each and every permit to which my license and company are associated with. I shall hold Collier County harmless from any incident in which may occur as a result of this master subcontractor affirmation. This affirmation is good for no more than 2 years. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting Department in writing, should I no longer be the subcontractor responsible for providing said contracting services for the contractor and development listed below. (Initials) Name of General Contractor for Project Subdivision Company Nami State License # Qualifier's Nam Qualifier's Sign; Contractor's Phone # Email Attention: Knowingly providing false information to obtain a permit to practice construction contracting is a violation of Florida Statute 489.929 and 489.533 STATE OF COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC (CHECK ONE): PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME PRODUCED I.D. TYPE OF ID PRODUCED SIGN PRINT NOTARY SEAL ,; Buildng Plan Reviv ;u & Inspection Division - 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239- 252 -2400 •, v.colfergov.net Co Yer County Growth Management Department Building Plan Review & Inspection Division MASTER MECHANICAL SUBCONTRACTOR AFFIRMATION To be completed by the qualifier working under the Primary Contractor. Only originals will be accepted. It is my responsibility as a mechanical contractor to verify each and every permit to which my license and company are associated with. I shall hold Collier County harmless from any incident in which may occur as a result of this master subcontractor affirmation. This affirmation is good for no more than 2 years. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting Department in writing, should I no longer be the subcontractor responsible for providing said contracting services for the contractor and development listed below. (Initials) Name of General Contractor for Project Subdivision Company Name State License # Qualifier's Name Qualifier's Signature Contractor's Phone # Attention: Knowingly providing false information to obtain a permit to practice construction contracting is a violation of Florida Statute 489.129 and 489.533 STATE OF COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC (CHECK ONE): PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME PRODUCED I.D. TYPE OF ID PRODUCED SIGN PRINT NOTARY SEAL D Building Ran Review& Inspection Division - 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239 -252 -2400 • www.colliergov.net CO ter COU.nty Growth Management Department Building Plan Review & Inspection Division MASTER ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR AFFIRMATION To be completed by the qualifier working under the Primary Contractor. Only originals will be accepted. It is my responsibility as an electrical contractor to verify each and every permit to which my license and company are associated with. I shall hold Collier County harmless from any incident in which may occur as a result of this master subcontractor affirmation. This affirmation is good for no more than 2 years. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting Department in writing, should I no longer be the subcontractor responsible for providing said contracting services for the contractor and development listed below. (Initials) Name of General Contractor for Project Subdivision Company Name State License # Qualifier's Name Qualifier's Signature Contractor's Phone # Attention: Knowingly providing false information to obtain a permit to practice construction contracting is a violation of Florida Statute 489.129 and 489.533 STATE OF COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC (CHECK ONE): PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME PRODUCED I.D. TYPE OF ID PRODUCED SIGN PRINT NOTARY SEAL G) Buildng Raan Review & Inspection Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Dare • Naples, Florida 34104.239- 252 -2400 • vivAu.colliergov.net Co ler 0014"ty Growth Management Department Building Plan Review & Inspection Division MASTER LOW VOLTAGE BCONTRACTOR AFFIRMATION To be completed by the qualifier working under the Primary Contractor. Only originals will be accepted. It is my responsibility as a low voltage contractor to verify each and every permit to which my license and company are associated with. I shall hold Collier County harmless from any incident in which may occur as a result of this master subcontractor affirmation. This affirmation is good for no more than 2 years. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting Department in writing, should I no longer be the subcontractor responsible for providing said contracting services for the contractor and development listed below. (Initials) Name of General Contractor for Project Subdivision Company Name State License # Qualifier's Name Qualifier's Signature Contractor's Phone # Email Attention: Knowingly providing false information to obtain a permit to practice construction contracting is a violation of Florida Statute 489.129 and 489.533 STATE OF COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC (CHECK ONE): PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME PRODUCED I.D. TYPE OF ID PRODUCED SIGN PRINT NOTARY SEAL ID Building Plan Review & Inspection Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239- 252 -2400 • wvvu.coltergov.net 00#krr CO-Unty Growth Management Department Building Plan Review & Inspection Division MASTER ROOFING SUBCONTRACTOR AFFIRMATION To be completed by the qualifier working under the Primary Contractor. Only originals will be accepted. It is my responsibility as a roofing contractor to verify each and every permit to which my license and company are associated with. I shall hold Collier County harmless from any incident in which may occur as a result of this master subcontractor affirmation. This affirmation is good for no more than 2 years. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting Department in writing, should I no longer be the subcontractor responsible for providing said contracting services for the contractor and development listed below. (Initials) Name of General Contractor for Project Subdivision Company Name State License # Qualifier's Name Qualifier's Signature Contractor's Phone # Attention: Knowingly providing false information to obtain a permit to practice construction contracting is a violation of Florida Statute 489.129 and 489.533 STATE OF COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC (CHECK ONE): PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME PRODUCED I.D. TYPE OF ID PRODUCED SIGN PRINT NOTARY SEAL i Building Flan Review& Inspection Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239- 252 -2400 • wwwcolliergoanet 0011ler C014-.ty Growth Management Department Building Plan Review & Inspection Division MASTER SEPTIC SUBCONTRACTOR AFFIRMATION To be completed by the qualifier working under the Primary Contractor. Only originals will be accepted. It is my responsibility as a septic contractor to verify each and every permit to which my license and company are associated with. I shall hold Collier County harmless from any incident in which may occur as a result of this master subcontractor affirmation. This affirmation is good for no more than 2 years. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting Department in writing, should I no longer be the subcontractor responsible for providing said contracting services for the contractor and development listed below. (Initials) Name of General Contractor for Project Subdivision Company Name State License # Qualifier's Name Qualifier's Signa Contractor's Phone # Email Attention: Knowingly providing false information to obtain a permit to practice construction contracting is a violation of Florida Statute 489.129 and 489.533 STATE OF COUNTY OF SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC (CHECK ONE): PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME PRODUCED I.D. TYPE OF ID PRODUCED SIGN PRINT NOTARY SEAL 0 Building Plan Review& Inspection Division •2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104,239-252-2400 • w+M.cdtergov.net 0011ler C MMty "Woo, 000OWN111111immoo" Growth Management Department Building Plan Review & Inspection Division PERMIT SPECIFIC SUBCONTRACTOR LIST Permit Number Job Site Address It is the primary contractor's responsibility to verify that the contractors listed below have been included within the primary contractor's master subcontractor affirmation forms previously submitted. If a subcontractor is inactive at the time this form is submitted, they will not be able to be attached to this permit. (Initials) Electrical Contractor [ ] Low Voltage Contractor State License #: Company Name: Qualifier's Name Plumbing Contractor State License #: Company Name: Qualifier's Name Mechanical Contractor [ ] Hood [ ] Walk -in Cooler State License #: Company Name: Qualifier's Name Roofing Contractor State License #: Company Name: Qualifier's Name Septic Contractor State License #: Company Name: Qualifier's Name Other Contractor State License #: Company Name: Qualifier's Name BtAdng Plan Review & Inspection Diui m - 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239- 252 -2400 • wow dlagov.net Structural Inspections Footings 100 A/C Rough • 300 Pile Caps 101 A/C Final 301 Grade Beam 102 Mechanical Piping 302 Floating Slab 103 A/C Change Out 303 Tie Beam 104 Kitchen Hood Rough 304 Shear Wall 105 Kitchen Hood Final 305 Columns 106 Walk -in Cooler Rough 306 Trusses /Roof Ply/W &D Bucks 107 Walk -in Cooler Final 307 Framing 108 • • • Rough Gas • 400 Insulation 109 Tie Down- Building 110 Final Gas 401 Roof in progress 111 Underground 403 Flood Proof 112 Tie Down- Mech/ Plumb 410 Final Building Lintel Beam 115 118 • • Electrical T -Pole • 500 Fill Cells 119 Rough Electrical 501 Flood Vent Relief 120 Final Electrical 502 Epicore Deck 121 Service Change 503 Steel in Stair /Columns 124 Commercial Temp Power 504 Elevator pit 125 Residential Temp Power 505 T/S Framing 130 Underground Electrical Conduit 506 T/S Drywall 131 TV /Telephone Rough 508 T/S Insulation 132 TV /Telephone Final 509 Monolithic Slab 133 Rough Alarm 510 Final Roofing 134 Final Alarm 511 Final Shutter 135 Rough Audio /Video 512 Impact Glass 136 Final AudioNideo 513 Termite Baiting 139 Rough Electrical Walls 516 Interior Termite 140 Rough Electrical Ceiling 517 Interior Slab Infill 141 Under Slab Electrical Conduit 518 Final Sign/ Flagpole 150 Low Voltage -Alarm Final 519 Final Building Fence 160 161 • • • Pool Steel (Bonding) • 700 Final Building Screen Cage Final Building Windows & Doors 162 Final Pool 701 Plumbing Underground • 200 Pool Deck Wet Niche 702 703 Plumbing Rough -in 201 Shell Reinforcement 704 Plumbing Stack Test 202 Pool Dimensions 705 Sewer Tap 203 Final Plumbing Pool 706 Final Plumbing 204 Final Electrical Pool 707 Final Irrigation 205 Rough Plumbing Pool 708 Grease Trap 206 Pressure Test Pool Pipe 709 Oil Interceptor 207 Fill Cells Pool 710 Pressure Test Piping 208 Footings Pool 711 Water Heater Replacement 209 Pile Caps Pool 712 Medical Gas Piping 210 Tie Beam Pool 713 Medical Gas Rough 211 Equal Potential Bonding Grid 714 Water Pipe Replacement 212 Meter and Cross- Connection Control Device Installation Charges Current (combined meter installation and cross connection device) Charges Compared To Proposed Charges Breakdown Of Change By Direct Cost Component For 3/4 Meters 3/4 inch Change Change Current Proposed With Service Line Installation Current Proposed $ % 3/4 inch $1,026.00 $1,049.00 $23.00 2.2% 1 inch $1,097.00 $1,202.00 $105.00 9.6% 11/2 inch $1,315.00 $1,813.00 $498.00 37.9% 2 inch $1,646.00 $2,179.00 $533.00 32.4% Parts $329.25 $465.67 $136.42 41.4% Change Without Service Line Installation Current Proposed $ % 3/4 inch $504.00 $556.00 $52.00 10.3% 1 inch $540.00 $684.00 $144.00 26.7% 11/2 inch $722.00 $1,109.00 $387.00 53.6% 2 inch $843.00 $1,434.00 $591.00 70.1% Breakdown Of Change By Direct Cost Component For 3/4 Meters 3/4 inch Change With Service Line Installation Current Proposed $ % Equipment $387,50 $154.00 ($233.50) -60.3% Labor $189.00 $245.33 $56.33 29.8% Parts $449.50 $649.67 $200.17 44.5% Total $1,026.00 $1,049.00 $23.00 2.2% 3 /4inch Change Without Service Line Installation Current Proposed $ % Equipment $93.75 $25.00 ($68.75) -73.3% Labor $81.00 $65.33 ($15.67) -19.3% Parts $329.25 $465.67 $136.42 41.4% Total $504.00 $556.00 $52.00 10.39,. er County MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS for COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT November 18, 2015 ElPublic Resources Management Group, Inc. Utility, Rate, Financial, and Management Consultants ElPublic Resources Management Group, Inc. Utility, Rate, Financial, and AlIanagement Consultants November 18, 2015 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners Collier County 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, FL 34112 Subject: Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis The Collier County Water -Sewer District (the "District ") historically has had charges or fees that are billed to customers to recover costs for specific services provided by the District at the request of a customer that benefit only that customer (e.g., service turn-on). These charges are commonly referred to as "miscellaneous service charges." Miscellaneous service charges provide a mechanism for the District to recover direct costs associated with a service that benefits one individual customer rather than the overall customer base. Such miscellaneous service charges thereby reduce the revenue requirements that must be recovered from all customers via monthly user rates. The District's miscellaneous service charge schedules were last modified on February 8, 2011 pursuant to Resolution No. 2011 -30, but most of the charges in the schedules have remained unchanged since 2008, or approximately eight (8) years ago. Since the utility's overall costs of providing service have increased since that time, Collier County (the "County") retained Public Resources Management Group, Inc. (PRMG) to perform a formal review of the District's miscellaneous fees to assist the District staff in: i) determining the cost of providing the applicable services; ii) recommending policies regarding fees that may not be entirely cost - based or are designed to meet a specific objective (e.g., promote timely payment through application of late payment fees); and iii) performing benchmarking against other Florida water / wastewater utilities. The proposed miscellaneous service charges are shown in Table ES -1 following this letter and were developed recognizing the following criteria: • The District's estimated direct and fully - loaded costs of providing such services; Charges for similar services of other Florida utilities (benchmarks); and • County procedures. Based on the rate development criteria mentioned above, the proposed miscellaneous service charges as shown in Table ES -1 are primarily based on the District's estimated direct costs (e.g., labor, vehicles / equipment and parts / supplies) of providing such services. They do not include supervisory, administrative, departmental overhead, or contingency allowances, which are sometimes included in such charges. KAD01125- 381Rpt1Misc Stec Charge Rpt 341 NORTH MAITLAND AVENUE —SUITE 300 — MAITLAND, FL 32751 Tel: 407 -628 -2600 • Fat: 407 - 628 -2610 • Email: PRMG a,PRMGinc.com * Website: www.PRMGinc.corn Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government November 18, 2015 Page 2 The increases in certain fees such as meter and cross connection device installation charges can be attributed to: 1. Changes in regulations affecting prices and installation configurations. The County has experienced a rise in the prices of parts due to the Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act which was enacted on January 4, 2011 to amend Section 1417 of the Safe Water Drinking Act. The new requirements, which became effective on January 4, 2014, prohibit the use of lead in any pipes, plumbing fittings or fixtures, solder and flux. 2. General inflation on the cost of materials and supplies attributable to providing the service. 3. Increases in the cost of personnel services, including the recognition of increased insurance costs. The proposed miscellaneous charges are comparable to charges for similar services by other utilities in the State of Florida as shown in Table 10 at the end of this report. It is important to note that, whereas the proposed charges are based on current costs, some other utilities may not have adjusted their miscellaneous charges for several years. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the County and would like to thank the County staff for their assistance and cooperation during the course of this study. Respectfully submitted, Public Resources Management Group, Inc. Robert J. Ori President INY74rV Bryan A. Mantz, CMC, CGFM Supervising Consultant Nicholas T. Smith Rate Analyst RJO /dlc Attachments x:OC\t 125- 3MptUse Svc Charge Rpt Table ES -1 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Summary of Existing and Proposed Miscellaneous Service Charges Line No. Description Existing Proposed Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device Installation Charges: With Service Line Installation 1 3/4" Meter N/A $ 1,049400 2 1" Meter N/A 1,202.00 3 1 -1/2" Meter N/A 1,813.00 4 2" Meter N/A 2,179.00 Without Service Line Installation (Drop -In) 5 3/4" Meter WA $ 556.00 6 1" Meter N/A 684.00 7 1-1/2" Meter N/A 1,109.00 8 2" Meter N/A 1,434.00 Meter Installation Charges: With Service Line Installation 9 3/4" Meter $ 779.00 Actual time and material cost 10 1" Meter 827.00 Actual time and material cost 11 1 -1 /2" Meter 940.00 Actual time and material cost 12 2" Meter 1,213.00 Actual time and material cost Without Service Line Installation (Drop-TO 13 3/4" Meter $ 257.00 Actual time and material cost 14 1" Meter 270.00 Actual time and material cost 15 1 -1/2" Meter 347.00 Actual time and material cost 16 2" Meter 410A0 Actual time and material cost Cross - Connection Control Device Charge - Meter Already Installed. (formerly known as Backflow Device) 17 3/4" Meter $ 247.00 Actual time and material cost 18 1" Meter 270.00 Actual time and material cost 19 1 -1/2" Meter 375.00 Actual time and material cost 20 2" Meter 433.00 Actual time and material cost Equipment (Per Hour Rates): 21 Rehab and Electrician's Truck - (1-3/4 Ton $ 77.00 $ 30.00 22 Crew Truck - (1 -1/2 Tan) 51.00 25.00 23 Vactor Truck 207.00 77.00 24 Camera Truck 155.00 52.00 25 Boom Truck 103.00 36.00 26 20 Y Large Dump Truck 72,00 60.00 27 l Q Y -and Smal Dump Truck 41.00 35.00 28 Pumper Truck 207.00 77.00 29 Track Hoe (Big or Small) 51.00 18.00 30 Back Hoe 67.00 33.00 31 Portable Generators 62.00 34.00 32 Portable By -Pass Pump (Small) N/A 18.00 33 Portable By -Pass Pum (Large) N/A 29.00 34 Dewatering System 41.00 10.00 35 4 =Trash Pump $ 10.00 S 5.00 36 Mud Hog 15.00 3.00 37 Trailer 46.00 11.00 38 Signs, Barricades and/or Traffic Board 103.00 Actual Cost 39 Road Saw 15.00 6.00 40 Compactor N/A 29.00 ES -1 Table ES-1 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Summary of Existing and Proposed Miscellaneous Service Charges Line No. Description Existing Proposed Equipment (Per Hour Rates). (cent) 41 Nfiseell eeus Small Equipment 5.00 N/A 42 Soft Dig Truck 100.00 54.00 43 Portable Lights 25,00 Actual Cost 44 Bucket Truck 125,00 18.00 45 Pickup Truck - 1/2 Ton 40.00 14,00 Labor (Per Hour Rates): 46 Utility Technician $ 27.00 $ 30.00 47 Eidd Supervisor 34.00 38.00 48 Crew Leader 29.00 33.00 49 Senior Crew Leader 30.00 34.00 50 Maintenance Specialist 28.00 32.00 51 Maintenance Worker N/A 25.00 52 Safety Coordinator 38.00 44.00 53 SCADA Operator 30.00 36.00 54 GIS Technician 32.00 34.00 55 Odor Control Specialist 32.00 34.00 56 Operations Coordinator 30.00 35.00 57 Parts Clerk 26.00 30.00 58 Equipment Operator 26.00 29.00 59 Laboratory Technician N/A 33.00 60 Industrial Pretreatment Ingpector N/A 36.00 61 Chemist N/A 37.00 62 Principal Environmental Specialist N/A 49.00 Miscellaneous Charges: 63 Administration (Per Incident) 15% or $300; whichever is smaller 5% or $100; whichever is smaller 64 Parts Actual Invoice Cost Actual Invoice Cost 65 Sub -contractors Actual Invoice Cost Actual Invoice Cost 66 Right of Way Permits Actual Cost Actual Cost 67 Laboratory Tests (Per Test) $ 25.00 $ 25.00 68 New Accounts - Change of Ownership $ 28.00 $ 22.00 69 Service Turn On or Turn Off at Owner's Request $ 50.00 $ 36.00 70 Meter Re -Read (if different - charge is $0) $ 50.00 $ 33.00 71 Meter Data Log Analysis $ 50.00 $ 39.00 Meter Test: 72 Utility Meter Testing Facility $ 140.00 $ 176.00 (more than 3% error - charge is $0) 73 Independent Meter Testing Facility $ 250.00 $ 240.00 (more than 3% error - charge is $0) ES -2 Table ES -1 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Summary of Existing and Proposed Miscellaneous Service Charges Line No. Description Existing Proposed Miscellaneous Charges: (coat.) 74 Meter Loc $ 55.00 $ 55.00 75 Meter Lock and Unlock, 2nd Event Durine Calendar Year -aed- SuHsegeeRf Events $ 55.00 $ 83.00 76 Meter Lock and Unlock 3rd and Subseouent Events During Calendar Year $ 55.00 $ 110.00 77 Meter Unlock After Normal Business Hours $ 100.00 $ 63.00 78 Meter Pull $ 110.00 $ 123.00 79 Meter Removal Actual time and material cost Actual time and material cost 80 Discontinuance of Service - Meter Removal Actual time and material cost Actual time and material cost 81 Illegal Connection_ Unlawful Connection- and Tampering Actual time and material cost, plus Actual time and material cost, plus consumption * *, plus a $300 fine consumption * *, plus other applicable fees as provided for in Section 2- 2044(b) of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances 82 Convenience Fee - Credit Card $ $ _ 83 Temporary Meter Art coun Deposit $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 84 Duplicate Bill Processing Fee $ 2.00 $ 1.00 85 Non - Sufficient Funds (NSF) Processing Charge per Actual Bank Charge assessed per Florida Statute 832.07: $0 to plus Admin fee of 5% of the $50 is a $25 charge; $50.01 to $300 amount or $100, whichever is is a $30 charge; over $300 is $40 or smaller 5 */a of check amount, whichever is greater 86 Late Payment Penalty 5% of unpaid balance 5 */e of current charges 87 Neh09110 .xF M -ef-ep Gb ur b e $ 60.00 N/A 88 Removal of Landscaping to Access Utility Assets $ 80.00 Actual time and material cost 89 Septage Processing Charge /1,000 gallons ! $ 35.00 $ 35.00 90 Grease Trap Waste Charge /1,000 gallons! $ 45.00 $ 45.00 * On an emergency basis only ** Consumption charges to be based on meter size, calculated by time connected, or average consumption, or 100,000 gallons ES -3 COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page No. Executive Summary Letter Table ES -1: Summary of Existing and Proposed Miscellaneous Service Charges............................................................................ ...........................ES -1 Tableof Contents .................................................................................... ............................... i GENERAL................................................................... ............................... I .......................... I DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES .. ..............................2 Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device Installation .................. ..............................2 With Service Line Installation ........................................................ ..............................2 Without Service Line Installation .................... ............................. ............................... Meter Installation -Only Charges ......................................................... ..............................5 Cross - Connection Control Device Charge — Meter Already Installed ..............................5 EquipmentHourly Rates .................................................................... ............................... 5 LaborHourly Rates ............................................................................ ............................... 6 Administration (per Incident) ............................................................ ............................... 7 Parts..................................................................................................... ............................... 7 Subcontractors.................................................................................... ............................... 7 Rightof Way Permits ......................................................................... ............................... 7 Laboratory Tests (per Test) ................................................................ ............................... 7 New Accounts — Change of Ownership .............................................. ..............................9 Service Turn -On or Turn -Off at Owner's Request .............................. .............................10 MeterRe -Read .................................................................................... .............................11 MeterData Log Analysis .................................................................... .............................12 MeterTest ........................................................................................... .............................13 UtilityMeter Testing Facility ......................................................... .............................13 Independent Meter Testing Facility ............................................... .............................15 K.\W1125- 3MpWke Svc Charge Rpf —i- COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.) Title Page No. Meter Lock and Unlock, 1 st Event during Calendar Year .................. .............................16 Meter Lock and Unlock, 2nd Event during Calendar Year ................ .............................17 Meter Lock and Unlock, 3rd and Subsequent Events during Calendar Year ..................17 Meter Unlock After Normal Business . Hours ...................................... .............................17 MeterPull ............................................................................................ .............................19 MeterRemoval .................................................................................. ............................... 20 Discontinuance of Service — Meter Removal .................................... ............................... 20 Illegal Connection, Unlawful Connection, and Tampering .............. ............................... 20 Temporary Meter Account Deposit .................................................... .............................21 Duplicate Bill Processing Fee ............................................................. .............................21 Non - Sufficient Funds (NSF) Processing Charge .............................. ............................... 21 LatePayment Penalty ........................................................................ ............................... 22 VehicleOver Meter ............................................................................. .............................22 Removal of Landscaping to Access Utility Assets ........................... ............................... 22 Septage Processing Charge / 1,000 Gallons ........................................ .............................22 Grease Trap Waste Charge / 1,000 Gallons ........................................ .............................22 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGE COMPARISON .................................... .............................23 (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) KADC1112S- 38\RptlMise Svc Charge Rpt -ii- COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS (contd.) Title Analysis Tables Page No. Table l: Development of Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device InstallationCharges ......................................................... .............................24 Table 2: Development of Laboratory Test Fee (Per Test) ............. .............................27 Table 3: Development of New Accounts — Change of Ownership Fee ...................... 29 Table 4: Development of Service Turn -On or Turn -Off Fee ....... ............................... 31 Table 5: Development of Meter Re -Read Fee ............................. ............................... 33 Table 6: Development of Meter Data Log Analysis Fee ............. ............................... 35 Table 7: Development of Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) ....... ............................... 37 Table 8: Development of Meter Lock and Unlock Fee ................ ............................... 39 Table 9: Development of Meter Pull Fee ..................................... ............................... 41 Table 10: Miscellaneous Service Charge Comparison .................... .............................44 KADCU 125- 38\RPINisc Svc OUP Rpt -iii- COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS GENERAL The Collier County Water -Sewer District (the "District ") historically has had charges or fees that are billed to customers to recover costs for specific services provided by the District at the request of a customer that benefit only that customer (e.g., service turn -on). These charges are commonly referred to as "miscellaneous service charges." Miscellaneous service charges provide a mechanism for the District to recover direct costs associated with a service that benefits one individual customer rather than the overall customer base. Such miscellaneous service charges thereby reduce the revenue requirements that must be recovered from all customers via monthly user rates. The District's miscellaneous service charge schedules were Iast modified on February 8, 2011 pursuant to Resolution No. 2011 -30, but most of the charges in the schedules have remained unchanged since 2008, or approximately eight (8) years ago. Since the utility's overall costs of providing service have increased since that time, Collier County (the "County ") retained Public Resources Management Group, Inc. (PRMG) to perform a formal review of the District's miscellaneous fees to assist the District staff in: i) determining the cost of providing the applicable services; ii) recommending policies regarding fees that may not be entirely cost - based or are designed to meet a specific objective (e.g., promote timely payment through application of late payment fees); and iii) performing benchmarking against other Florida water / wastewater utilities. As part of our review, PRMG performed the following tasks: We interviewed District staff regarding: i) the persons in the job classifications performing the miscellaneous services; ii) the estimated time involved to complete the services based on history and recent experience; iii) customer service involvement in processing a request for the services; iv) vehicles and equipment used; and v) materials and supplies required to perform the services. We included this information in our detailed calculations, and we validated that the assumptions are consistent with those used by other utilities in the State of Florida. • We reviewed the methodology for the hourly rates for vehicles and equipment to determine that there is a reasonable basis for such rates. The hourly rates utilized in the calculations are based on the published "Schedule of Equipment Rates" of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These rates are used to reimburse state and local governments for the use of vehicles and equipment during disaster recovery activities. Many other utilities in the State of Florida utilize the FEMA reimbursement rates in their miscellaneous service charge calculations. Utilization of published FEMA rates is also consistent with costing work orders for equipment in the County's enterprise asset management system currently under development. • We developed applicable supervisory, administrative, and departmental overhead allowances to fully identify the potential cost of providing the miscellaneous services. KAD01125- 38%WMiae 5w C6uge Rpt —I- • We prepared a comparison of the District existing and proposed charges with fees for similar service of other utilities in the State of Florida, which is shown in Table 10 at the end of this report. DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device Installation An identifiable service that is provided to the District's water customers to connect to the water distribution system. The connection can include either of two services: Installation of the service line (including the tap into the water main) from the water main to the meter box, as well as the meter box and meter and cross connection control device; or 2. Installation of the meter and cross - connection control device whereby a meter box is already installed by a third party (customer / contractor / developer) with an existuig tap into the water main. Essentially, the fee is designed to recover the cost of physically connecting to the District's water system (e.g., meter, meter box, connection for radio reads, service line, and associated labor). This fee should not be confused with a system development charge or impact fee which is charged to new water system customers for their proportionate share of the capacity associated with water production, treatment, and transmission facilities allocable to such customer. The District's charges for installation - related services are based on the size of the meter or service being installed, which recognizes differences in costs associated with the facility installations. Generally, larger service sizes have a higher installation cost (whether it be the cost of supplies and materials such as meters or the amount of time generally spent on the installation of the service). Any meter installations for meter sizes above 2- inches are performed by contractors. The County's Ordinance No. 97 -33 as amended requires cross - connection (backflow) prevention devices (reduced pressure zone devices downstream of the water meter) to be installed with any potable water meter installation. Currently, customers are charged the meter installation fee when applying for a permit and the cross - connection device fee after installation of the meter. Since both the meter and the backflow prevention device are installed at the same time, PRMG recommends that, in lieu of separate fees, a single fee be charged prior to installation to recover the cost of both the meter and the cross - connection control device. A single fee is easier to administer than two separate fees. With Service Line Installation The charge for the installation of a new service line, water meter, and cross - connection device is proposed to be paid prior to the meter and cross - connection control device installation. The development of the District's estimated cost to provide this service is shown in Table 1 and summarized as follows: K:Wl 125- 3MRptM Svc Charge Rpt -2- Development of Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device Installation Charges With Service Line Installation [11 Description 3/4" Meter V Meter 1 -1/2" Meter 2" Meter Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $240.00 $240.00 $300.00 $300.00 Supervisory Overhead 16.76 16.76 20.95 20.95 Departmental Overhead 15.86 15.86 19.82 19.82 Subtotal $272.62 $272.62 $340.77 $340.77 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 Supervisory Overhead 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Departmental Overhead 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Subtotal $6.26 $6.26 $6.26 $6.26 Vehicles and Equipment [ *j $154.00 $154.00 $179.00 $179.00 Parts and Supplies [ *] $648.90 $801.68 $1,328.58 $1,694.37 Administrative Overhead $6.65 $6.65 $8.15 $8.15 Contingency Allowance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $1,088.42 $1,241.20 $1,862.75 $2,228.54 Direct Costs [ *] $1,048.23 $1,201.01 $1,812.91 $2,178.70 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 1,064.29 1,217.07 1,832.94 2,198.73 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 1,081.77 1,234.55 1,854.61 2,220.40 [•] Indicates component of Direct Costs [11 Amounts derived from Table 1. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter and cross - connection control device installation charges with service line installation: Summary of Proposed Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device Installation Charges With Service Line Installation [1] Description 3/4" Meter V Meter 1 -1 /2't Meter 2" Meter Recommended Fee $1,049.00 $1,202.00 $1,813.00 $2,179.00 [1] Amounts derived from Table 1. K:U1C11125- 3g1RprlMisc Sw Charge Rpt -3- Without Service Line Installation The charge for the installation of only the meter into the meter box provided by property owner, as well as the cross - connection control device, is proposed to be paid prior to the teeter and cross - connection control device installation. The development of the District's estimated cost to provide this service is shown in Table 1 and summarized as follows: Development of Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device Installation Charges Without Service Line Installation [11 Description 314" Meter V Meter 1 -112" Meter 2" Meter Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $60.00 $60.00 $75.00 $90.00 Supervisory Overhead 4.19 4.19 5.24 6.29 Departmental Overhead 3.96 3.96 4.96 5.95 Subtotal $68.15 $68.15 $85.19 $102.23 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 Supervisory Overhead 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Departmental Overhead 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Subtotal $6.26 $6.26 $6.26 $6.26 Vehicles and Equipment ( *] $25.00 $25.00 $31.25 $37.50 Parts and Supplies [ *] $465.54 $593.24 $997.11 $1,300.69 Administrative Overhead $2.16 $2.16 $2.54 $2.91 Contingency Allowance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $567.11 $694.81 $1,122.35 $1,449.59 Direct Costs [ *] $555.87 $683.57 $1,108.69 $1,433.52 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 560.04 687.74 1,113.85 1,439.67 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 564.95 692.65 1,119.81 1,446.68 [ *] Indicates component of Direct Costs. [ l] Amounts derived from Table I. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter and cross - connection control device installation charges without service line installation: (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) K:%DOI 125- 381RpMfisc Svc Charge Rpt -4- Summary of Proposed Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device Installation Charges Without Service Line Installation [11 Description 3/4" Meter 1" Meter 1 -1/2" Meter 2" Meter Recommended Fee $556.00 [1] Amounts derived from Tablet. Meter Installation -Only Charges $684.00 $1,109.00 $1,434.00 If there is a situation in which a meter installation is to be performed without the installation of a cross - connection control device (e.g., due to a damaged meter), PRMG recommends that the charge for the service — with or without a service line installation — be based on the County's actual time and material cost. Cross - Connection Control Device Charge — Meter Already Installed In the event that a cross - connection control device must be installed or replaced on an existing customer's meter, PRMG recommends that the charge for the service be based on the County's actual time and material cost. Equipment Hourly Rates The equipment hourly rates are applicable when use of District equipment is requested by third parties. Based on discussions with County staff, the County's new enterprise asset management system will use Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) "Schedule of Equipment Rates" for purposes of tracking equipment casts. Using FEMA reimbursement rates to estimate direct equipment costs in miscellaneous fee calculations is a common practice among local governments. The FEMA rates are used by the Federal government to reimburse local governments for use of their equipment during emergencies declared by the Federal government (e.g., natural disasters). PRMG recommends that the equipment hourly rates for the District be adjusted to be generally consistent with the FEMA reimbursement rates as summarized in the following table: Summary of Equipment Hourly Rates Table continued onfollcivingpage. K DMI 125.381Rp1\Nis Svc Charge Rpt —5- Existing Proposed Description Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Rehab & Electrician's Truck -1 -1/2 Ton $77.00 $30.00 Crew Truck- -1 -1/4 Ton 51.00 25.00 Vactor Truck 207.00 77.00 Camera Truck 155.00 52.00 Boom Truck 103.00 36.00 Large Dump Truck 72.00 60.00 Small Dump Truck 41.00 35.00 Pumper Truck 207.00 77.00 Track Hoe (Big or Small) 51.00 18.00 Back Hoe 67.00 33.00 Portable Generators 62.00 34.00 Portable By -Pass Pump (Small) N/A 18.00 Table continued onfollcivingpage. K DMI 125.381Rp1\Nis Svc Charge Rpt —5- Summary of Equipment Hourly Rates (cont'd.) Existing Proposed Description Portable By -Pass Pump (Large) Dewatering System Trash Pump Mud Hog Trailer Signs, Barricades and/or Traffic Board Road Saw Compactor Miscellaneous Small Equipment Soft Dig Truck Portable Lights Bucket Truck Pickup Truck- 1/2 Ton Hourly Rate Hourly Rate N/A 29.00 41.00 10.00 10.00 5.00 15.00 3.00 46.00 11.00 103.00 Actual Cost 15.00 6.00 N/A 29.00 5.00 N/A 100.00 54.00 25.00 Actual Cost 125.00 18.00 40.00 14.00 The proposed hourly rates were used for purposes of deriving vehicle and equipment expenses for applicable miscellaneous service charges. Labor Hourly Rates The labor hourly rates are applicable when District staff members provide service to third parties. Based on discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the labor hourly rates for the District be adjusted based on: i) the County's Fiscal Year 2016 published midpoint rates for the pay grades of various positions; and ii) an allowance for employee benefits. The proposed labor hourly rates are summarized in the following table: Summary of Labor Hourly Rates Existing Proposed Description Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Utility Technician $27.00 $30.00 Field Supervisor 34.00 38.00 Crew Leader 29.00 33.00 Senior Crew Leader 30.00 34.00 Maintenance Specialist 28.00 32.00 Maintenance Worker N/A 25.00 Safety Coordinator 38.00 44.00 SCADA Operator 30.00 36.00 GIS Technician 32.00 34.00 Odor Control Specialist 32.00 34.00 Operations Coordinator 30.00 35.00 Parts Clerk 26.00 30.00 Equipment Operator 26.00 29.00 Laboratory Technician N/A 33.00 Industrial Pretreatment Inspector N/A 36.00 Chemist N/A 37.00 Principal Environmental Specialist N/A 49.00 K:U01125.38\RplM9C Svc OW,98 Rpt -6- Administration (per Incident) This charge is applicable when the District bills on a time and materials basis for planned or unplanned work, and covers the billing and collection of the invoice. Examples of such work include, but are not limited to, repairs on water mains, cross - connection control devices, and service lines; and relocation of a service line at customer's request. The current administration fee is currently 15% or $300, whichever is smaller. Based on discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District lower the fee to 5% or $100, whichever is smaller. Parts The District currently charges for materials, supplies, and parts as required to provide service based on the District's actual charges. PRMG recommends that the District maintain this practice. Subcontractors If any subcontractors are required to provide a requested service, the District currently charges for the subcontracts based on actual invoice cost. PRMG recommends that the District maintain this practice. Right of Way Permits Right of way permits are required by Collier County per Ordinance No. 2003 -37 when working in the public right of way. To obtain such a permit, plans detailing the work to be completed must be provided, along with the names of people who will be performing the work. Once the permit is issued, the work is inspected to ensure it has been completed in accordance with the Ordinance. The District currently charges for services associated with right of way permits based on actual costs. PRMG recommends that the District maintain this practice. Laboratory Tests (per Test) The District currently charges $25 per test for bacteriological tests performed to determine whether a water main is acceptable for conveying potable water. As part of the test process, the residual chlorine and pH levels are determined or verified, as they are indicators of possible problems in a public water supply. Currently, there is only one test performed, so only one fee is applicable. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) K:1DC\712Y3MpAMisc Svc Charge Rpt -7- The development of the District's estimated cost to provide this service is shown in Table 2 and summarized as follows: Development of Laboratory Test Fee ]1] Description Amount Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $5.50 Supervisory Overhead 1.32 Departmental Overhead 1.53 Subtotal $8.35 Customer Set-vice Salaries and Benefits [ *] $2.67 Supervisory Overhead 0.36 Departmental Overhead 0.10 Subtotal $3.13 Parts and Supplies [ *] $15.93 Administrative Overhead $0.48 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $27.89 Direct Costs [ *] $24.10 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 25.73 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 27.41 [ *] Indicates component of Direct Costs. [1] Amounts derived from Table 2. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District maintain the existing fee: Summary of Existing and Proposed Laboratory Test Fee [1] Existing Fee $25.00 Recommended Fee $25.00 [1] Amounts derived from Table 2. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) K1DCU 125 -3 e1RP MM Svc ChW90 Rpt -8- New Accounts — Change of Ownership Application processing and service initiation is a customer- requested service that is necessary to both begin and end the billing process and utility relationship with the customer (i.e., would terminate service with final bill rendered). The development of the District's estimated cost to provide this service is shown in Table 3 and summarized as follows: Development of New Accounts — Change of Ownership Fee [l] Description Amount Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $20.90 Supervisory Overhead 3.40 Departmental Overhead 0.74 Subtotal $25.04 Parts and Supplies [ *] $0.49 Administrative Overhead $2.69 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $28.22 Direct Costs [ *] $21.39 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 22.13 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 25.53 M Indicates component of Direct Costs. [11 Amounts derived from Table 3. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following new accounts — change of ownership fee: Summary of Existing and Proposed New Accounts — Change of Ownership Fee ill Existing Fee $28.00 Recommended Fee $22.00 [1] Amounts derived from Table 3, K:M01125- 39U2p1\Mw Svc ClfaW Ppt —9— Service Turn -On or Turn -Off at Owner's Request This charge is applicable if a customer requests to have his or her water service turned on or turned off (e.g., one trip). The development of the District's estimated cost to provide this service is shown in Table 4 and summarized as follows: Development of Service Turn -On or Turn -Off at Owner's Request Fee [1] Description Amount Service Personnel $35.27 Salaries and Benefits [ *] $17.50 Supervisory Overhead 1.22 Departmental Overhead 1.16 Subtotal $19.88 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $9.60 Supervisory Overhead 1.30 Departmental Overhead 0.36 Subtotal $11.26 Vehicles and Equipment [ *] $8.17 Administrative Overhead $1.64 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $40.94 Direct Costs [ *] $35.27 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 36.79 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 39.30 ["] Indicates component of Direct Costs. [1] Amounts derived from Table 4. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following service turn -on or turn -off at owner's request fee: Summary of Existing and Proposed Turn -On or Turn -Off at Owner's Request Fee Ill Existing Fee $50.00 Recommended Fee $36.00 [I] Amounts derived from Table 4. KADCV 125 -3 KiRpWisc Sw Charge Rpt -to- Meter Re -Read The meter re -read charge is applicable if a meter reading is found to be correct within acceptable limits (per American Water Works Association, within +/- 3 %) when a re -read is performed after a customer disputes: i) the meter read on the bill; or ii) the read result after the District staff has advised him or her of a high read. Generally, the District staff will already have re -read the meter to ensure that the radio read was accurate. The development of the District's estimated cost to provide this service is shown in Table 5 and summarized as follows: Development of Customer Request Meter Re -Read Fee 111 Description Amount Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $15.00 Supervisory Overhead 1.05 Departmental Overhead 0.99 Subtotal $17.04 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $4.80 Supervisory Overhead 0.65 Departmental Overhead 0.18 Subtotal $5.63 Vehicles and Equipment [ *] $12.50 Administrative Overhead $0.98 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $36.14 Direct Costs [ *] $32.30 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 33.47 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 35.17 [*] Indicates component of Direct Costs [ I ] Amounts derived from Table 5. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter re -read fee: KAMI 125 -3 Mpt Mise Svc Charge Rpt _11- Summary of Existing and Proposed Customer Request Meter Re -Read Fee ill Existing Fee $50.00 Recommended Fee $33.00 [1] Amounts derived from Table 5. Meter Data Log Analysis Modem digital register meters have the capability to store consumption through the meter for a period of time. This analysis might be requested if customer is disputing a bill or trying to identify the cause of higher than anticipated water consumption. The analysis can indicate continual running (leak) or mechanical turn -on and off by a plumbing device (e.g., faucet, irrigation, water softener). The development of the District's estimated cost to provide this analysis is shown in Table 6 and summarized as follows: Development of Meter Data Log Analysis Fee [1 ] Description Amount Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $33.00 Supervisory Overhead 2.40 Departmental Overhead 2.27 Subtotal $37.67 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $5.33 Supervisory Overhead 0.72 Departmental Overhead 0.20 Subtotal $6.26 Vehicles and Equipment [ *] $0.00 Administrative Overhead $1.53 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $45.45 Direct Costs [ *] $38.33 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 40.81 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 43.93 [ *] Indicates component of Direct Costs [1] Amounts derived from Table 6. K.: \DC11125- 381RptMsc Svc Chuge Rpt -12- Based on the District's costs associated with this service, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter data log analysis fee: Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Data Log Analysis Fee [11 Existing Fee $50.00 Recommended Fee $39.00 [ 1l Amounts derived from Table 6. Meter Test Customers may request bench testing of water meters to verify the accuracy of the meters. This fee is very common in the industry. For utilities that charge a meter bench - testing fee, the fee is generally retained by the utility only if the test shows that the meter is registering within the acceptable accuracy limits as established by the American Water Works Association guidelines. For the District, if the meter is accurate within +/- 3 %, the customer must pay the fee. The District offers customers the opportunity to have the meter temporarily removed from the service address and taken to a testing facility for controlled flow testing. The customer chooses whether to have the service performed at a utility meter testing facility or at an independent meter testing facility. Utility Meter Testing Facility The development of the District's estimated cost to perform a meter bench test at the District's meter testing facility at Carica is shown in Table 7 and summarized as follows: Development of Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) Utility Meter Testing Facility [1) Description Amount Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $82.50 Supervisory Overhead 6.00 Departmental Overhead 5.68 Subtotal $94.18 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $5.33 Supervisory Overhead 0.72 Departmental Overhead 0.20 Subtotal $6.26 Vehicles and Equipment [ *] $62.50 Other [ *] $25.00 Table continued on following page. &ADCU 125- 38\RfflMfi oSvc Charge Rw —13- Development of Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) — Utility Meter Testing Facility [11 (cont'd.) Description Amount Administrative Overhead $2.81 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $190.74 Direct Costs [ *] $175.33 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 18111 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 187.93 ['] Indicates component of Direct Costs. [1] Amounts derived from Table 7. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter test charge if performed at a District utility meter testing facility: Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) — Utility Meter Testing Facility [1[ Existing Fee $140.00 Recommended Fee $176.00 [1] Amounts derived from Table 7. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) KADCU 125- 38WtlM. Svc Charge Rpt —14- Independent Meter Testing Facility The development of the District's estimated cost if a meter bench test is performed at an independent meter testing facility is shown in Table 7 and summarized as follows: Development of Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) — Independent Meter Testing Facility [1] Description Amount Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $82.50 Supervisory Overhead 6.00 Departmental Overhead 5.68 Subtotal $94.18 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $5.33 Supervisory Overhead 0.72 Departmental Overhead 0.20 Subtotal $6.26 Vehicles and Equipment [ *j $62.50 Other [ *] $89.45 Administrative Overhead $2.81 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Cost $255.19 Direct Costs [ *] $239.78 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 245.66 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 252.38 N Indicates component of Direct Costs 111 Amounts derived from Table 7. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter test charge if the test is performed at an independent meter testing facility: Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) — Independent Meter Testing Facility [11 Existing Fee $250.00 Recommended Fee $240.00 pl Amounts derived from Table 7. KAD0112.5 -3 RW AMu Svc Charge Rpt -15- Meter Lock and Unlock, 1st Event during Calendar Year The due date on each utility bill is 20 days from the date the bill is mailed. If payment has not been received 5 days after the due date, a courtesy call is made to the customer to remind the customer that the utility bill is delinquent. A second courtesy call is made 4 days later if payment still has not been received. A meter is locked 11 days after the due date (31 days after bill is mailed) if payment has not been received in accordance with the Special Act of the Florida Legislature prohibiting free service. The development of the District's estimated cost to lock and then unlock a meter during normal business hours (i.e., requires two trips) is shown in Table 8 and summarized as follows: Development of Meter Lock and Unlock Fee during Normal Business Hours [11 Description Amount Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $30.00 Supervisory Overhead 2.10 Departmental Overhead 1.98 Subtotal $34.08 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $0.00 Supervisory Overhead 0.00 Departmental Overhead 0.00 Subtotal $0.00 Vehicles and Equipment [ *] $25.00 Administrative Overhead $0.75 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Costs $59.83 Direct Costs [ *] $55.00 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 56.98 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 59.08 [ *] Indicates component of Direct Costs. [1] Amounts derived from Table 8. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter lock and unlock fee during normal business hours for the first event during a given calendar year: X-ADOI 125.38\RptMw Svc Cha%e Rpt —16^ Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Lock and Unlock Fee during Normal Business Hours — lst Event during Calendar Year [11 Existing Fee $55.00 Recommended Fee $55.00 [11 Amounts derived from Table 8, Meter Lock and Unlock, 2nd Event during Calendar Year To encourage customers to pay their water and sewer utility bill in a timely manner (thereby reducing the utility staffing resources being utilized to perform meter locks and unlocks rather than operational functions related to providing water service) and based on discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the meter lock and unlock fee during normal hours for the second event during a calendar year be 150% of the $55 fee for the first event (discussed previously in this report as shown in the following table: Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Lock and Unlock Fee during Normal Business Hours — 2nd Event durine Calendar Year Existing Fee $55.00 Recommended Fee $83.00 Meter Lock and Unlock, 3rd and Subsequent Events during Calendar Year To further encourage customers to pay their utility bill in a timely manner, and based on discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the meter lock and unlock fee for the third and subsequent events during a calendar year be 200% of the $55 fee for the first event (discussed previously in this report) as shown in the following table: Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Lock and Unlock Fee during Normal Business Hours — 3rd and Subsequent Events during Calendar Year Existing Fee $55.00 Recommended Fee $ 1 10.00 Meter Unlock After Normal Business Hours After Normal Business Hours includes the time between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. on weekdays and all day Saturday, Sunday, and holidays. Normal shift crews perform this task between 7:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M., while a second shift crew has been assigned this task from 4:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. On -call staff perform this task between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. If a customer requests that a meter be unlocked before the next business day, he or she will pay an after normal x:Tcu Ir- 3sdipMC= sw cnm-ge xpt -17- business hours unlock fee. Calls after normal business hours are answered by the County's outsourced call center (Business One). For service after normal business hours, the County's on -call policy per Chapter CMA 5341: Compensation Administration, Office of County Manager Administrative Procedure, is to pay employees a minimum two hours of labor when the employee is not otherwise scheduled to work. The development of the District's estimated cost to unlock a meter after normal business hours — and the associated additional cost compared with a meter unlock during normal business hours -- is shown in Table 8. The cost difference is summarized as follows: Development of Additional Cost to Unlock Meter After Normal Business Hours [11 Description Amount Service Personnel Salaries and Benefits [ *] $62.78 Supervisory Overhead 3.05 Departmental Overhead 2.88 Subtotal $68.71 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $0.00 Supervisory Overhead 0.00 Departmental Overhead 0100 Subtotal $0.00 Vehicles and Equipment [ *] $0.00 [2] Administrative Overhead $1.09 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Costs $69.80 Direct Costs [ *] $62.78 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 65.66 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead +Direct Supervisory with Contingency 68.71 [ «] Indicates component of Direct Costs. [1] Amounts derived from Table 8. [2] Vehicles and equipment costs are included in the nonnal business hours lock / unlock fee. The additional costs to unlock a meter after normal business hours are related to labor. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) K001125- 381Rpt1Micc Svc Charge Rpt -18- Based on the District's costs associated with this set-vice, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter unlock fee for after normal business hours service: Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Unlock After Normal Business Hours Fee [1] Existing Fee $100.00 Recommended Fee $63.00 [l] Amowits derived from Table 8. Meter Pull This charge is applicable if a meter is removed to shut off service due to tampering with a meter lock or other illegal activity. The development of the District's estimated cost to pull a meter is shown in Table 9 and summarized as follows: Development of Meter Pull Charge [1] Description Amount Service Personnel 2.16 Salaries and Benefits [ *] $45.00 Supervisory Overhead 3.14 Departmental Overhead 2.97 Subtotal $51.12 Customer Service Salaries and Benefits [ *] $16.00 Supervisory Overhead 2.16 Departmental Overhead 0.61 Subtotal $1 8.77 Utility Ordinance Enforcement Salaries and Benefits [ *] $17.00 Supervisory Overhead 3.53 Departmental Overhead 0.85 Subtotal $21.38 Vehicles and Equipment [ *] $44.50 Administrative Overhead $5.35 Contingency Allowance $0.00 Total Allocated Costs $141.11 Table continued on fol/mvtng page. xAocu125.38\RpWie SwChargewn -19- Development of Meter Pull Charge [11 (cont'd.) Description Amount Direct Costs [*] $122.50 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 126.93 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 135.76 [ *] Indicates component of Direct Costs. [1] Amounts derived from Table 9. Based on the District's costs associated with this service, consideration of the District's existing fees, and discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District consider adopting the following meter pull charge: Summary of Existing and Proposed Meter Pull Charge [11 Existing Fee $110.00 Recommended Fee $123.00 [1] Amowits derived from Table 9. If the customer wishes to have the meter reinstalled, the District's then- current meter installation charges are applicable. Meter Removal This charge is applicable if a property owner requests that the meter be removed, but intends to have it reinstated at a later date, potentially due to a lot / property being redeveloped. The meter installation costs are incurred later once the new service line or meter location can be finalized. The District currently charges for meter removals based on the actual time and material cost, and PRMG recommends that this practice he maintained. Discontinuance of Service — Meter Removal This charge is applicable when all outstanding balances have been paid and a demolition permit has been completed. The District currently charges for meter removals based on the actual time and material cost, and PRMG recommends that this practice be maintained. Illegal Connection, Unlawful Connection, and Tampering When an illegal connection has been made, or if there has been other tampering with water service, the actual time and cost of the repair / replacement is charged currently by the County, plus the cost of the water consumed, plus a $300 fine. There is also typically a citation for endangering health and safety. KA W1125.39%pANfj= ff- Charge Rpt -20- Based on discussions with District staff and a review of similar charges for neighboring and other Florida utilities, PRMG recommends that the $300 fine be changed to applicable fees as provided for in Section 2- 2044(b) of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances which currently has a fee of $105 for the first violation, $255 for the second violation, and $405 for subsequent uncontested violations. Temporary Meter Account Deposit This deposit is charged for any temporary meter and backflow device, whether static or traveling, to offset any damages, meter repair or replacement costs, or outstanding balances for base charges and consumption. The current deposit is $1,000. A common utility practice is to link the deposit to the cost of the meter. Based on discussions with District staff regarding the current costs of temporary meters, the associated cross - connection control device, and the administration costs associated with maintaining the account, the deposit is recommended to be maintained at $1,000. Duplicate Bill Processing Fee Property owners who have a tenant occupy their property are required to inform the utility so that a bill can be sent to both the owner and the tenant. The property owner must receive the original utility bill since the owner is ultimately responsible, subject to a property lien in accordance with Chapter 2003 -353, Laws of Florida, otherwise known as the Special Act (the "Special Act ") of the Florida Legislature that created the District. The District currently charges $2.00 to render a duplicate bill. Based on discussions with District staff regarding the current costs of producing a duplicate bill, PRMG recommends that the $2.00 fee per duplicate bill be lowered to $1.00 to recover printing and mailing costs. Non - Sufficient Funds (NSF) Processing Charge When checks are received by the District from utility customers in payment of a bill that are subsequently refused by the bank, the District incurs costs for the checks being returned to the customer. The non - sufficient funds (NSF) processing charge is intended to recover costs incurred by the District. This fee is very common in the utility industry. The current NSF processing charge is based on the actual bank charge assessed plus an administration fee of 5% of the check amount or $100, whichever is smaller. Based on the parameters regarding violations involving checks and drafts as contained in Florida Statutes Section 832.07, it is recommended that the County adopt the following schedule with respect to non - sufficient funds: Proposed Non - Sufficient Funds Processing Charge Amount For checks up to $50.00 $25.00 For checks $50.01 to $300.00 $30.00 For checks above $300.00 $40.00 or 5% of check amount, whichever is greater R\D01 125-38ftiMsc Svc charge Rpt —21- Late Payment Penalty In order to encourage timely payment of monthly service bills and to compensate for additional costs associated with increased customer service costs, a late payment or penalty charge has been adopted by several utilities. This fee is usually assessed to customers that are delinquent in the payment of utility bills for monthly service. Such fees are very common in the utility industry as well as other industries that extend credit to customers (e.g., credit card companies). In general, the fee is usually charged as a percentage of the outstanding bill and provides for: i) the lost opportunity cost of interest earnings on cash balances; ii) the administrative costs associated with notification to the delinquent customer, customer accounting, and data processing; iii) the additional costs associated with the need for utilities to have cash working capital balances in excess of needed levels because of non - payment of bills; and iv) a monetary incentive to compel prompt payment practices. Currently, the District charges 5% of the current charges. The late payment penalty fee is a policy decision and, based on discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the District maintain the current late payment penalty. Vehicle Over Meter This charge, which is currently $60, is applicable when a vehicle is parked over a meter box and the owner has to move it, requiring two trips by staff to be made for completion of the work. Although the current radio read meters can obtain a reading even if a vehicle is parked over a meter box, the County staff may still on occasion have difficulties obtaining a reading. Based on discussions with District staff, PRMG recommends that the vehicle over meter charge be removed from the utility's miscellaneous service charge schedule, as fines can be imposed based on the County's current parking laws. Removal of Landscaping to Access Utility Assets If District staff must remove landscaping to keep utility assets free from foliage, a charge of $80 is currently imposed. Based on discussions with District staff, the level of effort to remove landscaping can vary widely among sites. As such, PRMG recommends that the charges be based on the actual time and material costs. Septage Processing Charge / 1,000 Gallons Historically, the District charged $45 per 1,000 gallons to approved contractors that discharged wastewater into the utility's wastewater facilities. Based on discussions with District staff, the County's current wastewater treatment plant operating permit as issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) does not allow this practice. PRMG recommends that the existing charge be maintained so that a rate can be applied in the event of an emergency situation. Grease Trap Waste Charge / 1,000 Gallons Historically, when a pumper truck was required to remove waste, the District charged a rate of $45 per 1,000 gallons. Based on discussions with District staff, this service is no longer K:\Mj 125.381RpW,= Svc Charge Rpt —22— performed. PRMG recommends that the existing charge be maintained but will only be applied in the event of an emergency situation. MISCELLANEOUS CHARGE COMPARISON The proposed miscellaneous charges are considered by PRMG to be comparable to charges for similar services by other utilities in the State of Florida. Table 10 at the end of this report contains a limited comparison of the proposed fees with those of other Florida utilities. It is important to note that, whereas the proposed charges for the District are based on current costs, some other utilities may not have adjusted their miscellaneous service charges for several years.) (Remainder of page intentionally left blank) KAMI 125- 1A\RptMsc s w cnaee xpt -23- ANALYSTS TABLES LIST OF TABLES Table Page No. Table Title No. Table 1: Development of Meter and Cross - Connection Control Device �111i InstallationCharges .................................................................... .............................24 Table 2: Development of Laboratory Test Fee (Per Test) ........................ .............................27 Table 3: Development of New Accounts — Change of Ownership Fee .... .............................29 Table 4: Development of Service Turn On or Turn Off Fee ..................... .............................31 Table 5: Development of Meter Re -Read Fee .......................................... .............................33 Table 6: Development of Meter Data Log Analysis Fee .......................... .............................35 Table 7: Development of Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) .................... .............................37 Table 8: Development of Meter Lock and Unlock Fee ............................. .............................39 Table 9: Development of Meter Pull Fee .................................................. .............................41 Table 10: Miscellaneous Service Charge Comparison ............................... .............................44 �111i A Q i� b 3x >, U y � e U v w 0 U a w °°g� °o °o$ °o `$�h.$��iN�•�c°v vim'. m o °$ $ °o aam��rnao`�,� 3 H H H H H H bt H f V h 0 0� S pp 6 O n N N T In n O tMt M W r O N 7 ^„'�, eppp 0p V°j S O o C M Vl VI .-+ O b O O U O N y H H Vi H Vpi Op 4 S Q O P 8 O+ OND N 0Hpp p 3 O N a 00 N S o o r r M M~ M M r N 00 d ^' m O M N N '+ O �O 0 0 0 b •� yj O pp fV M [ii O CU H H S O O O O SQ O 7 r n 00 Ni O M M W r O N V 000o p pH O O O S H F d ci M N N fY .9 ,a'3 H H A EA sp9 H Yf pti p �p p -+ C O •-i O O N .f �+j + b O N vi N O �G C C O �C yj O .6 gi • H pH OH Q�Hpp p pH GH pH is a H H H H H H H O •C M h K H H H H H H e a a i \ }y M p •u `.a � �. v v a N di Ll p u u p�py ti W g x ° .� 7 '� '� q U .° A •3 O ° � � •d b g it g 9 3 0 o O c] aU � RU $ P°. •� •`� Si �j �i u ... F `�(j � y o � � � �..-w° �° �°y o � �wyy� y U(y fn �•. p� .4 va t� 00 'n g 66 (i 7Z 15 v C7. G .4 O to I , TI- P A P q!Q 4 Q 5� ry �v 3� U � v 3 0 U o 9 eJ 'a 'o a 0 O U T 0 ° °iah E�9 � a 0 `wd w B^3 eT S 42 Y O a W O Fa• 7 p Y 5 3 a 1 ep �• �aN tiz N N NN N tS tV N _ fS y H y H y a a h b b p 8 N to H H H yy oe m ao m m m fJ �8 H H H H N N O O vn N j y H H H H H H H H h VI h Yt h V1 au y y N y aC a A y b A U a 9 N C N Y uu uT � vy{ 9 q 'a x5x5 �j o d f 'a 'o a 0 O U T 0 ° °iah E�9 � a 0 `wd w B^3 eT S 42 Y O a W O Fa• 7 p Y 5 3 a Table 2 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Laboratory Test Fee (Per Test ine No. Description Fee Calculation Service Personnel 253250 - WaterLaboratory Labor 1 2 3 4 Laboratory Technician [1] Rate Per Hour [2] Total Cost - Laboratory Technician Total Labor Cost - Water Laboratory 0.17 $ 33.00 5.50 5.50 5 5 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Utility Technician Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 35.18 %) [3] 1.75 1.32 6.82 6 Subtotal - Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 7 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 40.81 %) 1.53 8 Water Division Director Multiplier (@ 2.65 %) 0.10 9 Total Service Personnel Costs S 8.45 Customer Service 210153 - Customer Service Department Labor 10 Fiscal Technician 0.08 11 Rate Per Hour [2] $ 32.00 2.67 12 Total Cost - Fiscal Technician 2.67 13 Total Labor Cost - Customer Service 14 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Fiscal Technician 0.93 15 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 20.78 %) [4] 0.36 3.03 16 Subtotal - Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 17 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 5.83 %) 0.10 18 Customer Service Manager Multiplier (@ 13.67 %) 0.24 19 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.45°/a) 0.08 20 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 3.44 Parts and Supplies [5] 21 Membrane Filters $ 0.47 22 P. aeruginosa 5.60 23 E. aerogenes 8.24 24 mENDO agar 0.05 25 96% Ethanol 0.01 26 Petri Dishes 0.30 27 Chlorine Test Strips 0.66 28 Phosphate Buffer 0.33 29 ThioBags 0.27 30 Total Parts and Supplies $ 15.93 Utilities Administration 31 Utilities Administration Multiplier (@ 1.17% ) [6 $ 0.06 27 Table 2 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Laboratory Test Fee (Per Test) Line No. Description Fee Calculation Direct Costs 32 Service Personnel $ 5.50 33 Customer Service 2.67 34 Parts and Supplies I5.93 35 Total Direct Costs $ 24.10 Indirect Costs 36 Supervisory Overhead $ 1.68 37 Departmental Overhead 1.63 38 Water Division Director Overhead 0.10 39 Manager Overhead 0.24 40 Financial Operations Director Overhead 0.08 41 Utilities Administration 0.06 42 Total Indirect Costs $ 3.79 43 Total Direct and Indirect Costs $ 27.89 44 Contingency Allowance (@ 0 %) _ 45 Total Cost with Contingency $ 27.89 46 Direct Costs $ 24.10 47 48 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 25.73 27.41 49 Recommended Rate $ 25.00 50 lExisting Rate $ 25.00 Footnotes: [1] Time estimate only includes estimated time for performing the test, including set -up and quality control samples. Time estimate does not include actual sampling time. [2] Hourly rates based on current midpoint rates as provided by the County. [3] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Environmental Compliance Supervisor. [4] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Customer Service Supervisor. [5] Does not include equipment used to perform the test, e,g., incubators, pumps, etc. [6] Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead. 28 Table 3 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of New Accounts - Change of Ownership Fee 111 Line No. Description Fee Calculation Customer Service 210153 - Customer Service Department Labor 1 Fiscal Technician 0.37 2 Rate Per Hour $ 32.00 11.73 3 Total Cost - Fiscal Technician 0.10 4 Operations Coordinator 5 Rate Per hour $ 35.00 3.50 6 Total Cost - Operations Coordinator 15.23 7 Total Labor Cost - Customer Service Personnels 8 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Fiscal Technician 4.11 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Operations Coordinator 1.14 9 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 20.78 %) [2] 2.07 17.31 10 Subtotal - Customer Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 11 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 5.83 %) 0.58 12 Customer Service Manager Overhead Multiplier (@ 13.67 %) 1.36 13 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.45 %) 0.44 14 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 19.70 210151 - Client Billing Department Labor 15 Accounting Technician 0.17 16 Rate Per hour $ 34.00 5.67 17 Total Cost - Accounting Technician 5.67 18 Total Labor Cost - Utility Billing 19 20 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Accounting Technician Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 34.06 %) [3] 1.78 1.32 6.99 21 Subtotal - Billing and Supervisory Costs 22 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.1 %) 0.16 23 Billing Manager Overhead Multiplier (@ 14.02 %) 0.54 24 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.45 %) 0.17 25 Total Billing Personnel Costs $ 7.87 Parts and Supplies 26 Postage $ 0.49 Utilities Administration 27 Utilities Administration Multiplier (@ 1.17 %) [4] $ 0.16 PAL: Table 3 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of New Accounts - Chan¢e of Ownership Fee [11 Line No. Description Fee Calculation Direct Costs 28 Customer Service $ 20.90 29 Parts and Supplies 0.49 30 Total Direct Costs $ 21.39 Indirect Costs 31 Supervisory Overhead $ 3.40 32 Departmental Overhead 0.74 33 Manager Overhead 1.91 34 Financial Operations Director Overhead 0.62 35 Utilities Administration 0.16 36 Total Indirect Costs $ 6.83 37 Total Direct and Indirect Costs $ 28.22 38 Contingency Allowance (@ 0 %) - 39 Total Cost with Contingency $ 28.22 $ 21.39 40 Direct Costs 40 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 22.13 41 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 25.53 42 Recommended Rate S 22.00 43 1 Existing Rate $ 28.00 Footnotes: 11 ] New Account requests are started by Billing and Change of Ownership requests are started by Customer Service. [2] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Customer Service Supervisor. [3] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Billing Supervisor. [4] Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead. 30 Table 4 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Service Turn On or Turn Off Fee [ 11 Line No. Description Fee Calculation Service Personnel 253215 - Meter Services Department Labor 1 Utility Technician 0.58 2 Rate Per Hour [2] $ 30.00 17.50 3 Total Cost - Utility Technician 17.50 4 Total Labor Cost - Meter Services 5 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Utility Technician 6.09 6 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.71 %) [3] 1.22 18.72 7 Subtotal - Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 8 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.13 %) 1.16 9 Water Division Director Multiplier (@ 2.65 %) 0.30 10 Total Service Personnel Costs $ 20.18 Customer Service 210153 - Customer Service Department Labor I 1 Fiscal Technician 0.30 12 Rate Per Hour [2] $ 32.00 9.60 13 Total Cost - Fiscal Technician 9.60 14 Total Labor Cost - Customer Service 15 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Fiscal Technician 3.37 16 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 20.78°/x) [4] 1.30 10.90 17 Subtotal - Customer Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 18 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 5.83 %) 0.36 19 Customer Service Manager Overhead Multiplier (@ 13.67 %) 0.85 20 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.45 11/o) 0.28 21 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 12.39 Vehicles and Equipment [5] Pickup Truck - (1/2 Ton) 22 Number of Hours Used 0.58 23 Cost Per Hour $ 14.00 24 Total Vehicle Expenses $ 8.17 Utilities Administration 25 Utilities Administration Multiplier (@ 1.17 %) [6] $ 0.21 31 Table 4 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Develooment of Service Turn On or Turn Off Fee 111 Line No. IDescription Fee Calculation Direct Costs 26 Service Personnel $ 17.50 27 Customer Service 9.60 28 Vehicles and Equipment 8.17 29 Total Direct Costs $ 35.27 Indirect Costs 30 Supervisory Overhead $ 2.52 31 Departmental Overhead 1.52 32 Water Division Director Overhead 0.30 33 Manager Overhead 0.85 34 Financial Operations Director Overhead 0.28 35 Utilities Administration 0.21 36 Total Indirect Costs $ 5.68 37 Total Direct and Indirect Costs $ 40.94 38 Contingency Allowance (@ 0 %) _ 39 Total Cost with Contingency $ 40.94 40 Direct Costs $ 35.27 41 Direct Costs +Departmental Overhead with Contingency 36.79 42 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 39.30 43 Recommended Rate $ 36.00 44 1 Existing Rate $ 50.00 Footnotes: [11 Fees shown represent the total charge for turning on or turning off service (e.g., one trip). [2] Hourly rates based on current midpoint rates as provided by the County. [31 Reflects the supervisory rate for the Manager of Meter Services. [41 Reflects the supervisory rate for the Customer Service Supervisor. [5] Rates derived from FEMA's Schedule of Equipment Rates. [6] Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead. rya Table 5 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Re -Read Fee Line No. Description Fee Calculation Service Personnel 253215 - Meter Services Deuartment Labor 1 Utility Technician 0.50 2 Rate Per Hour [1] $ 30.00 15.00 3 Total Cost - Utility Technician 15.00 4 Total Labor Cost -Meter Services 5 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Utility Technician 5.22 6 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.71 %) [2] 1.05 16.05 7 Subtotal - Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 8 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.13 %) 0.99 9 Water Division Director Multiplier (@ 2.65 %) 0.26 10 Total Service Personnel Costs $ 17.30 Customer Service 210153 - Customer Service Department Labor 11 Fiscal Technician 0.15 12 Rate Per Hour [1] $ 32.00 4.80 13 Total Cost - Fiscal Technician 4.80 14 Total Labor Cost - Customer Service 15 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Fiscal Technician 1.68 16 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 20.78 %) [3] 0.65 5.45 17 Subtotal - Customer Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 18 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 5.83 %) 0.18 . 19 Customer Service Manager Overhead Multiplier (@ 13.67 %) 0.43 20 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.45 %) 0.14 21 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 6.19 Vehicles and Equipment 141 Crew Truck - (1 -1/2 Ton) 22 Number of Hours Used 0.50 23 Cost Per Hour $ 25.00 24 Total Vehicle Expenses $ 12.50 Utilities Administration 25 Utilities Administration Multiplier (@ 1.17 %) [5] $ 0.15 33 Table 5 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Re -Read Fee Line No. Description Fee Calculation Direct Costs 26 Service Personnel $ 15.00 27 Customer Service 4.80 28 Vehicles and Equipment 12.50 29 Total Direct Costs $ 32.30 Indirect Costs 30 Supervisory Overhead $ 1.70 31 Departmental Overhead 1.17 32 Water Division Director Overhead 0.26 33 Manager Overhead 0.43 34 Financial Operations Director Overhead 0.14 35 Utilities Administration 0.15 36 Total indirect Costs $ 3.84 37 Total Direct and Indirect Costs $ 36.14 38 Contingency Allowance (@ 0 %) - 39 Total Cost with Contingency $ 36.14 40 Direct Costs $ 32.30 41 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 33.47 42 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 35.17 43 Recommended Rate $ 33.00 44 Existin Rate $ 50.00 Footnotes: [1] Hourly rates based on current midpoint rates as provided by the County. [2] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Manager of Meter Services. [3] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Customer Service Supervisor. [4] Rates derived from FEMA's Schedule of Equipment Rates. [5] Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead 34 Table 6 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Data Lot! Analysis Fee Line No. Description Fee Calculation Service Personnel 253215 - Meter Services Department Labor 1 Crew Leader 1.00 2 Rate Per hour [1] $ 33.00 33.00 3 Total Cost - Crew Leader 33.00 4 Total Labor Cost - Meter Services 5 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Crew Leader 10.59 6 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.71 1/6) [2] 2.40 35.40 7 Subtotal - Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 8 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.13 %) 2.27 9 Water Division Director Multiplier (@ 2.65 %) 0.59 10 Total Service Personnel Costs $ 38.26 Customer Service 210153 - Customer Service Department Labor 11 Fiscal Technician 0.17 12 Rate Per Hour [I] $ 32.00 5.33 13 Total Cost - Fiscal Technician 5.33 14 Total Labor Cost - Customer Service 15 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Fiscal Technician 1.87 16 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 20.78 %) [3] 0.72 6.05 17 Subtotal - Customer Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 18 Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 5.83 %) 0.20 19 Customer Service Manager Overhead Multiplier (@ 13.67 %) 0.47 20 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.45 1/o) 0.15 21 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 6.88 Utilities Administration 22 Utilities Administration Multiplier (@ 1.17 %) [4] $ 0.30 Direct Costs 23 Service Personnel $ 33.00 24 Customer Service 5.33 $ 38.33 25 Total Direct Costs 35 Table 6 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Data Loz Analysis Fee Line No. Description Fee Calculation Indirect Costs 26 Supervisory Overhead $ 3.12 27 Departmental Overhead 2.47 28 Water Division Director Overhead 0.59 29 Manager Overhead 0.47 30 Financial Operations Director Overhead 0.15 31 Utilities Administration 0.30 32 Total Indirect Costs $ 7.12 33 Total Direct and Indirect Costs $ 45.45 34 Contingency Allowance (@ 0 %) - 35 Total Cost with Contingency $ 45.45 36 Direct Costs $ 38.33 37 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead with Contingency 40.81 38 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 43.93 39 Recommended Rate $ 39.00 40 1 Existing Rate $ 50.00 Footnotes: [1] Hourly rates based on current midpoint rates as provided by the County. [2] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Manager of Meter Services. [3] Reflects the supervisory rate for- the Customer Service Supervisor. [4] Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead. 36 Table 7 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Test Fee (3 /4" to 2" Meter) nie No. Description Utility Meter Testing Facility Independent Meter Testing Facility Service Personnel 253215 - Meter Services Department 1 2 3 4 Labor Crew Leader [ 1 ] Rate Per Hour Total Cost - Crew Leader Total Labor Cost - Meter Services 2.50 33.00 2.50 33.00 8150 82.50 82.50 82.50 5 6 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Crew Leader Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.71 %) [2] 26.47 6.00 26.47 6.00 88.50 5.68 88.50 5.68 7 8 Subtotal - Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 10.13 %) 9 Water Division Director Multiplier (@ 2.65 0%) 1.49 1.49 10 Total Service Personnel Costs $ 95.66 $ 95.66 Customer Service 210153 - Customer Service Department Labor 11 Fiscal Technician 0.17 0.17 12 Rate Per Hour $ 32.00 $ 32.00 5.33 5.33 13 Total Cost - Fiscal Technician 0.00 0.00 14 Additional Fiscal Technician 15 Rate Per hour 32.00 32.00 0.00 0.00 16 Total Cost - Additional Personnel 5.33 1 5.33 17 Total Labor Cost - Customer Service 18 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost - Fiscal Technician 1.87 1.87 19 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier (@ 20,78%) [3] 0.72 0.72 6.05 6.05 20 Subtotal - Customer Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs Departmental Overhead Multiplier (@ 5.83 %) 0.20 0.20 22 Customer Service Manager Overhead Multiplier (@ 13.67 %) 0.47 0.47 121 23 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier (@ 4.45 %) 0.15 0.15 24 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 6.88 $ 6.88 Vehicles and Equipment ]4] 25 Crew Truck - (1 -1/2 Ton) Number of Hours Used 2.50 2.50 26 Cost Per Hour $ 25.00 $ 25.00 27 Total Vehicle Expenses $ 62.50 $ 62.50 Other 28 Freight for Meters $ - $ 8-00 29 independent Lab Test - 30.00 30 Bench Test [5] 25.00 - 31 25% of Cost of New Meter [61 - 51.45 32 Total Other Expenses $ 25.00 $ 89.45 Utilities Administration 33 Utilities Administration Multiplier (@ 1.17 %) [7] $ 0,70 $ 0.70 37 Table 7 Collier County Water -Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Test Fee (3/4" to 2" Meter) Line No. Descri tion Utility Meter Testing Facility Independent Meter TestinR Facglity Direct Costs 34 Service Personnel $ 8230 $ 82.50 35 Customer Service 5.33 5.33 36 Vehicles and Equipment 62.50 62.50 37 Other 25.00 89.45 38 Total Direct Costs S 175.33 $ 239.78 Indirect Costs 39 Supervisory Overhead $ 6.72 S 6.72 40 Departmental Overhead 5.88 5.88 41 Water Division Director Overhead 1.49 1,49 42 Manager Overhead 0.47 0.47 43 Financial Operations Director Overhead 0.15 0.15 44 Utilities Administration 0.70 0.70 45 Total Indirect Costs S 15.41 S 15.41 46 Total Direct and Indirect Costs S 190.74 S 255.19 47 Contingency Allowance (Q 0%) - _ 48 Total Cost with Contingency $ 190.74 S 255.19 $ 175.33 $ 239,78 49 Direct Costs 50 Direct Costs +Departmental Overhead with Contingency I81.21 245.66 51 Direct Costs + Departmental Overhead + Direct Supervisory with Contingency 187.93 252.38 52 Recommended Rate $ 176.00 S 240.00 53 Existin Rate $ 140.00 $ 250.00 Footnotes: [ 11 Hourly rates based on current midpoint rates as provided by the County. [2] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Manager of Meter Services, [3] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Customer Service Supervisor. [4] Rates derived from FEMA's Schedule of Equipment Rates. [5] Bench test represents in -house cost for annual calibrations, running water through a meter at various flows, etc. [6] Allowance to reflect the fact that, due to the amount of time required for independent meter testing, County must replace customer's meter with new meter. Once the old meter returns from the independent testing facility, it is not reinstalled. [71 Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead, 38 Table 8 [ Collier County Water-Sewer District [ Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Lock and Unlock Fee [ Lock and Unlock After Normal Business Hours[6] . Unlock Unlock Unlock I Line During Normal During Normal After Normal Cost 1 No. Description Business Hours j Business Hours Business Hours[7] Difference i Service Personnel i 253215-Meter Services Department 1. 1 Labor [ Utility Technician 1.00 0.50 2.00 } Rate Per Hour[1] $ 30.00 $ 30,00 $ 38,89 [ 1 Total Cost-Utility Technician 30.00 15.00 77.78 62.78 2 Total Labor Cost-Meter Services 30.00 15.00 77.78 62.78 3 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost-Utility Technician 10.44 5,22 20.41 15.19 4 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier(®10,71%)[2] 2.10 L05 4.10 3.05 5 Subtotal-Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 32.10 16.05 81.88 65.83 6 Departmental Overhead Multiplier(®10.13%) 1.98 0.99 3.88 2.88 7 Water Division Director Multiplier(®2.65%) 0.52 0.26 1.01 0.75 8 Total Service Personnel Costs $ 34.60 $ 17.30 $ 86.76 $ 69.47 • Customer Service 210153-Customer Service Department Labor Fiscal Technician 0.00' 0,00 0.00 Rate per Hour[1] $ 32.00 $ 32.00 $ 32.00 9 Total Cost-Fiscal Technician 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 Total Labor Cost-Customer Service Personnels 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 11 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost-Fiscal Technician 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 12 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier(®20.78%)[3] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 Subtotal-Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 Departmental Overhead Multiplier(®5.83%) 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 15 Customer Service Manager Multiplier(®13,67%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00• 16 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier(®4,45%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ - $ - $ - $ - Vehicles and Equipment[4] Crew Truck-(1-112 Ton) 1 18 Number of Hours Used 1.00 3 0.50 0.50 19 Cost Per Hour $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 20 Total Vehicles and Equipment Expenses $ 25.00 $ 12.50 $ 12.50 $ - 1 Utilities Administration 1 21 Utilities Administration Multiplier(®1.17%)[5] $ 0.23 $ 0.11 $ 0.45 $ 0.33 Direct Costs 22 Service Personnel $ 30.00 $ 15.00 8 77,78 $ 62,78 23 Customer Service - - - - 24 Vehicles and Equipment 25,00 12.50 12.50 - 25 Total Direct Costs $ 55.00 S 27.50 $ 90.28 S 62.78 Indirect Costs ' 26 Supervisory Overhead $ 2.10' S 1.05 $ 4.10 $ 3.05 27 Departmental Overhead 1.98 0.99 3.88 2.88 28 Water Division Director Overhead 0.52 0.26 1.01 0.75 29 Manager Overhead - - - - 30 Financial Operations Director Overhead - - - 31 Utilities Administration 0.23 0.11 0.45 0.33 32 Total Indirect Costs $ 4.83 $ 2.41 $ 9.43 $ 7.02 a 39 Table 8 Collier County Water-Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Develonment of Meter Lock and Unlock Fee Lock and Unlock After Normal Business Hours[6] Unlock Unlock Unlock Line During Nonnal During Normal After Normal Cost No. Description Business Hours Business Hours Business Hours[7] Difference 33 Total Direct and Indirect Costs 5 59.83 $ 29.91 S 99.71 $ 69.80 34 Contingency Allowance(@ 0%) - - - 35 Total Cost with Contingency $ 59.83 $ 29.91 S 99.71 S 69.80 36 Direct Costs $ 55.00 $ 27.50 $ 90.28 $ 62.78 37 Direct Costs+Departmental Overhead with Contingency 56.98 28.49 94.15 65.66 38 Direct Costs+Departmental Overhead+Direct Supervisory with Contingency 59,08 1 29.54 98.25 68.71 39 Recommended Rate S 55.00 $ 63.00 40 Existing Rate $ 55.00' $ 100.00 Footnotes: [1] Hourly rates based on current midpoint rates as provided by the County.Hourly rates for service after normal business hours are 1.5 times those during normal business hours in accordance with County policy. [2] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Manager of Meter Services. [3] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Customer Service Supervisor. [4] Rates derived from FEMA's Schedule of Equipment Rates. [5] Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead. [6] In accordance with County policy,"After Normal Business Hours"is 10:00 P.M.to 7:00 A.M.on weekdays and all day Saturday and Sunday. [7] Per County policy,a minimum of 2 hours are charged for service provided after normal business hours, 40 il Table 9 Collier County Water-Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Pull Fee r 1 Line No. Description Fee Calculation t Service Personnel 253215-Meter Services Department ' Labor I 1 1 Utility Technician 1.50 2 Rate Per Hour[1] $ 30.00 3 Total Cost-Utility Technician 45.00 4 Total Labor Cost-Meter Services 45.00 ? 5 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost-Utility Technician 15.66 6 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier(@ 10.71%)[2] 3.14 7 Subtotal-Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 48.14 j 8 Departmental Overhead Multiplier(@ 10.13%) 2.97 1 9 Water Division Director Multiplier(@ 2.65%) 0.78 10 Total Service Personnel Costs $ 51.89 Customer Service 210153-Customer Service Department Labor 11 Fiscal Technician 0.50 12 Rate Per Hour[1] $ 32.00 13 Total Cost-Fiscal Technician 16.00 14 Total Labor Cost-Customer Service 16.00 15 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost-Fiscal Technician 5.61 16 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier(@ 20.78%)[3] 2.16 17 Subtotal-Service Personnel and Supervisory Costs 18.16 18 Departmental Overhead Multiplier(@ 5.83%) 0.61 19 Customer Service Manager Multiplier(@ 13.67%) 1.42 20 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier(@ 4.45%) 0.46 21 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 20.65 Utility Ordinance Enforcement 210154-Contract Management&Utility Ordinance Enforcement Department Labor 22 Investigator 0.50 23 Rate Per Hour[1] $ 34.00 24 Total Cost-Investigator 17.00 25 Total Labor Cost-Utility Enforcement 17.00 26 Benefits Portion of Total Labor Cost-Investigator 5.50 27 Supervisory Overhead Multiplier(@ 30.68%)[4] 3.53 28 Subtotal-Utility Enforcement Personnel and Supervisory Costs 20.53 29 Departmental Overhead Multiplier(@ 7.41%) 0.85 30 Utility Compliance Manager Overhead Multiplier(@ 13.67%) 1.57 31 Financial Operations Director Overhead Multiplier(@ 4.45%) 0.51 32 Total Customer Service Personnel Costs $ 23.47 41 Table 9 Collier County Water-Sewer District Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Pull Fee Line No. Description Fee Calculation Vehicles and Equipment[5] Crew Truck-(1-1/2 Ton) 33 Number of Hours Used 1.50 34 Cost Per Hour $ 25.00 Pickup Truck-(1/2 Ton) 35 Number of Hours Used 0.50 36 Cost Per Hour $ 14.00 37 Total Vehicle Expenses $ 44.50 Utilities Administration 38 Utilities Administration Multiplier(®1.17%)[6] $ 0.60 Direct Costs 39 Service Personnel $ 45.00 40 Customer Service 16.00 41 Utility Enforcement 17.00 42 Vehicles and Equipment 44.50 43 Total Direct Costs $ 122.50 Indirect Costs 44 Supervisory Overhead $ 8.83 45 Departmental Overhead 4.43 46 Water Division Director Overhead 0.78 47 Manager Overhead 2.99 48 Financial Operations Director Overhead 0.97 49 Utilities Administration 0.60 50 Total Indirect Costs $ 18.61 42 i Table 9 R 3 Collier County Water-Sewer District 3 Miscellaneous Service Charge Cost Recovery Analysis Development of Meter Pull Fee Line No. Description Fee Calculation i 51 Total Direct and Indirect Costs $ 141.11 1 52 Contingency Allowance(@ 0%) - I 53 Total Cost with Contingency S 141.11 54 Direct Costs $ 122.50 55 Direct Costs+Departmental Overhead with Contingency 126.93 1 56 Direct Costs+Departmental Overhead+Direct Supervisory with Contingency 135.76 I 57 Recommended Rate $ 123.00 1 { 58 Existing Rate $ 110.00 I Footnotes: [1] Hourly rates based on current midpoint rates as provided by the County. [2] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Manager of Meter Services. [3] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Customer Service Supervisor. [4] Reflects the supervisory rate for the Utility Compliance Supervisor [5] Rates derived from FEMA's Schedule of Equipment Rates. [6] Applied to direct labor costs only and does not include supervisory overhead or departmental overhead. 43 .. v v 'o °n v M aa8 N2 0— i; M Q ur N 1A W u H'� °� N iq C 2 M � H 6 '21 m m 11' 6, 4 o yy�� qq 0. rr�. a W .-1 &�f Q vi''' ¢ �i E n z ne w 41 : 1? : : 5 o O f9 4 z z TJ a a N a O 3•! o —° 3 w ^. g 8 E ,o° ° C °�f+ U ti 2 �L Ail X 1.-, �° 1A M z p+ H U 'tf °u c°0 pu a- O 2 0 ,- +& �v _ M o` Z W ti °: b o u , o A z � v t a 3 a g o I w o a a v e U 6. U U a y u Q w za a U .. H rn 7 v, r U U 4 I. '1 P 1 X rt gg 9 5 z 2 a ' I ti 8.� 8 oH V ..1.: z z a > d 30 3 S at. t g gc°..I n hyl a mm v a a , 3 i 8 d oy Mb N '�i ,,, lVy� N a F. C z x a t g z z z z z z q� F 6 'e E E 8 p C i U aq�O m I a a a o a E U d 1, u is h z g . s + ,, g 3 N N y H 4 te�aa 8 .1:1.4i rr u iH,g a 0 T. I 8 a a ki U V 0. .4 r U U e a -.:4n:....- W O 3 3 00 as .. ci ..3 U U .re er 69 vl R9 ¢ N O N 7 H » N A H y o 3 y a 9 g I H z Z z z z o ° O AA:. ' M 4 ry o ry e�f z ...s. . ; 5 g z z z H z a C c , g a1 cd ;h ycs� m Nry p _i V L :4 u M H 6N9 ¢ con N ¢ y yy a 4• F d ft m u v -c o E n 8 'dig c vy3 1 C Q ((rr�� (M(rrs� off. Nh y Yf iNA !A V1 G9 0�0 y u ff m 69 ii q q u si b u � C .1-4 cv W m o o p U e n U g U va 2 10 U a r $, o.1 t I e Ca o F U , U U L. E do q G1 z ^ ^ ^ ^ N . a x e x z z z H °4 8 a z z .rd R z y ii z y o 91 1 o z H d fn y . 4 wS g z ° N ° 3 H F a z H4 I H i m `n ro # d d d} d z J Vl H z G H W .T F+ .1 G s 4 5� i b i 8 ryry e a U ..- t fa il, z z z z w a a ' F VU �a .o't i U,5 s ,B .L A 4 1 ll'IA ', . H 1 d L- ' r7 °.O C ^ N�a z H H H bf H H H V G' 5 o A o 4 0 .5 8 ig 3S s < 1 w a ac w�S S .*� w �s u 3 30 a a 3 y ;A' 10 ° 0. v, 4, U U 'G . U A 2 d 0 e o U U 3 U N N A N N N N .] U U \ . & E z \g ƒ § 2 .so ,8 ! III _ 2 e: ƒ) ) & # 2 1 : . \/ t - - 3 2 } ! } \ d .: � . )! ; � § 2 _ & c .,_99r, ) )) ® « t8 )! k . | 1 /} tin �� .iƒ/ e � § +$ƒ/ $ [ ƒ A f 19a AS \)k A ) b CZ A\ E 4 ~ \\ EE }J ` ; t � .i - 22 ) : (a { �i t ]® j ' p)f ) }4 A !� |) |I ! a , _ ${ ;4,a ) j g! $722} . ` /} Ji)Q.8 A. \ } \ ` ¥ !E E E W r o' b S3 0 oa ES $uv : lf % T 8 B U rd "HI; = a S '3 3 $A .��v� + g c g 8 e o° oUY u dt, � A p 6� O W na� O 1 6 y3 8 fl� �1 U p d B N � 1.2 - � O 1 e � e9 ? o 8 „ a a rn u ° -di 5 'A O 44Z;N ' t G .. U i $4 Z z Z Z r 4/ 2 5 U ¢¢� p w' y F 9 1 It 0 G L,+ u FA z z z z. lz 3 U C y b H u a y� ,,,•{U+ emu`, ^may°( 7qq rw., Ja I a e o ,„q 4 1,7W11 e T w A N — 7«A o W_Q V1 U) !� a a6aD7 m� > g�y yo$ o°o °k� og -8 . oy t oo 8 v w 54,-..p, d `boy Eo goy Ey mod m -off �y w u 8' '�'o 0 F � g 11411 a wgnw e» b.h oy ; �4 1111 IT ! ° "8 ey g7 1 _ yc2v+ Ac,,oE' mG"„ eyed ° mye .4 ) 4-- ...40..5 C o p oo w 5 w'^ .y ... h ,� ro h.� - 24-- '^ U Vl aw2.g 1Sya dopy . «y� ,2 °Zd� �°no y $ ,a e .n . a I t � a .. t. . n w 0a 4 { `' Am _ " a s . u u D $s'` b k $•a° m 2 "' o "' SE, Ill 3w G H o g 3 E A i a S o I' < ,to t I tt d ( 0 a° I b a P 3•n 3 a f' 8 o 0 0 0 o O e W o U c_, u U V a 1 6 a E z0 A cn to .^ N rn 7 h ,O n a m a q a s a F.A. 3 w a� a. S 5e U g m h 2 g 0 7 " •g E �• 8 a : g 8 0 9 $ 8 11 11 6 11—:;4t.e ° o a 8 z - u °°47 a a 8 H N a a a a a a " z z z z 0 dg a 115 9 IA U au E E z z z s a a z z 0.U C "1 1 '44 4 8 s ° b ,, F. Y ° F 1 0. 8 o 4 u a u p 4,1 I e i 8 a ;44,7 x c N a 8, `a �b U ° 'n N C7 "" w nist ° 0 L ° 0 ..- el. p ass ., ^ H 0 4 a O" opy S v w O. 0 h O d N . a d Oa G ,- 6 v ^° o e vp vZ 'A -w 2 '" •"Gee ild •I ° ilfi.. ooag m B eet.. •8 o 3 y°�e m 4 .101 aE'u 5 4 . c a a w y m W,� «h Cc,� «v� -IA , �c+ u S l 6 42273 27 3 v 5;.M a !,5„.. „py0 `,•o po p.5: 4--.� � ad 4 g.H 4 "0,K �q e 8 , A H �y M" w G1 F a �, ryry< w E3 u t'3 _ P.4.... 2 w Id . e d il;iil 2 aA a » I g EA tee; ° " 2' 2y u 28E o a �s r C G 2 5 C F am 3.� 3 w a 8 0 C0. ° v .-t 0 0 ? w U a U U U t ` 8 g w° d LI 0 U t7 z Ca n ° 3 3 a0 a P O_ CIi .M. 2 U 0 . { U U 0 O O . T u W D G 8 °g U a 1� a 5 r u 69 ° ] 3 ` U a ..21 .,::311 c a 0.4 0 ,d a d N Q d a C m ;. , f+,3 u 3 aw N rO '� �' 8 J N � v n E n d 8.e C I a P ' - 8 �tU w ° ; $ n H iA 1 ep 0 H will 1 3 a n w 0g a + > =g S Q Q a a a d s' e Z x z Z ° x 3 a Qd S E g ag d o p O q w §1 a ° ff°c °A > d z a 9 o n a g 4 —8 — ° 8 °O J U ` yN ° o 1mn i° « « g o R tb F 's . � e a o ° , 0s n ^ iw l s v° «c ° e 1 ° u H 1 $ 3 i'f $ V G m 1 0 g 1.,T N 8 > -1 ° I o1 c os i j gift E° b nt3 H J q �e V y KK al N � O bW �v N1 U s .e 2 C o a tt 2v,a ii e " °� e3 .., a o a a.;, H a y m .5 1m r a n o f 22 � a',, ,°.4 v) °.5 W a'^ h x Q as H'a H8o B$8 gUo «go 50 a."a'l e ;4 a-a mw y l «,3 t y « s e w °u o*" a eS .4 a h s a v°'. w' o �°ur. � w C Et y,� b v, � U F F v° p u C at Ei M vi g « 6 g.0 2 Q 9 E c � P.K A)w ; 1 i t a K w H °° H P .M H ts. 9 h x 1 I � b W U s o Z zo a 1 01 o 9 w e tea` 3 6. 1 t Zs U U r. t.' b y U U `a s x ° vl - b v ** N N U U Y ., a , .t- Jaw rt v caw T e.. e °p5° �c °u«o�U °° $ . 0 o a. A - ,2 7, g s9 a l 3 w8 �.a;j oS m Y i 4 ``Y,° rl u w C x.ai t• .G E g: .7.-3: : 5 Q Q z `f a FU°,n e z S. v i 15 ` '''‘.°•=1- a 2 Z z S H 2 g ^ a A U O o ° ¢c� uu «3 Ly ; 1. 2-9,.., f; u u O G 1 1 2 Y `� •n e gig * a w i 711 T e l °V ° ° Y o c o A yy q . 1 Q Q Q Q Q Q N Z Z Z.9 N g v b 1 Z a en^ 9 a Y CJ ml iiL .3ggNV = g3 Z Z 2 A 1 E aR if w 5 v c aH 8 o r 4 Hi' h N I:W q _° al . ,° d 4E Q 111 s a -1 ,A N .i g ° • ` 2 a p e b o m .�q a a o G v o a p µ. tq U tn N .W .5 p p D r p ti ° `.Y y U'1. w ,e$, Q U t 5. ,1,2 Q fl i..14 -I 1.1 4.8 y:, O 442_ .a -Y -..c ..N E a« Y e Y f4 Y..,a z y f.5 Z o'� can ° °w ti q$ 'an = ^ yueo u d„o 3 ▪�0 3 ma's 3 mMNw Y1 E4 4 e •� a A -1- W ,n W▪ .� y ° � C _v?' c4 e c 17,-a ;.; o.n.9 S ,ao.4 `° E°.3 `a `'80 NM° S- 7-. 0.eepp a. S .N• 4 0 m O G9 $H a p9 N 2 W« s."24 y N N +”N "'leg FA 3 N 0 3 il �5a .62a E y s I Vii y �a •.. .4 °Y. J x F., E .. 2, E E C C f� q C Y 9° 8 cg iw TW _ 0 € iII (g ti .�° '',7L 0. H U q o U b a Q A U u .� 0 6 A A f�f Vt �p ff Z. V U N N N N N N N .3 U U 1- e • 'C 3 y G ` w GL 4 t Y 8 U o v a F 2 � � G g " �' O c � . i d7 w y or I v n a' b r y p p y x E. A e y U e 7 u c ,a go 04.1 z 1 H SA ro o E U g a o F ii 2� e IA 'o' C 2 T N 0 e� W W o w J v d Fti 1 8 0 0 ° � Yn 0 4x o i h U e 9 e (� UU u 4 my 6...in a U C ti —,4t in".M g 9,ra o u 2 A 8 4 2 a 9 N M !f 3 U 69 coati Ia °e C w `or $ g ..R 0 3 9 z a r w ..o°m . v ..,,,mm .L. 9 W o. S �8 Y� th" a�' rig CCo [-1 k,C (,fI r' U yy N` y_ Nw v E Fm u H E; �*F t - " v c 40 3 v O`m°ry a Gg a o u a a O $ oo °i A a u . w b w w d d° v v 8p L 4" g,5 Q H 3 e o°.39 is V,Z o�0 U 1E E 8 Z fl ° i 3 3 N a C 8 o z Expedited Permitting for Target Industry Economic Development Projects in Collier County ( The Office of Business&Economic Development is Collier County's supporting agency to carry out the Board of County Commission's economic development strategy of long term economic prosperity by encouraging a competitive business climate and diversifying the economy. The Office of Business& Economic Development and its partners work to market the County's efforts to create a business friendly climate for economic development projects. One particular advantage of a business friendly climate, expedited permitting,is an important part of any community's economic development toolkit and is a valued strategy for attracting target industry for the purposes of diversifying the economy in our community. For this reason,the Office of Business&Economic Development is requesting consideration by this advisory group for authorizing the Growth Management Department additional discretion beyond what current protocol for expediting permits allows. The additional discretion,would ( allow properly identified "Qualified Economic Development Projects"to be cued up for review and processing outside of the sequence in which they are received in the application process. Adding this flexibility will allow the Growth Management Department to work with Economic Development on significant strategic community changing projects yet remain within Growth Management's ability to avoid disrupting the guaranteed delivery on all other permits. The eligibility criteria to be a "Qualified Economic Development Project" proposed is clear and would consist of a written determination by the County's Office of Business and Economic Development that the project meets the special criteria of target industries which are developed by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO)and Enterprise Florida, Inc. (EFI). The target industries are defined in the attached excerpt of F.S. 288.106 and specified by the current Enterprise Florida's list of target industries. The industries included are determined as"targeted" primarily in that they grow our local economy by exporting a good,commodity or service and in return import new dollars into the local economy creating real wealth. Growth in target industries can diversify a local economy by increasing the balance of businesses focused on production for export to outside markets, in contrast with a disproportionately high percentage of businesses serving consumption driven by local markets. It is important to preserve the excellent progress made by the Collier County Growth Management Department toward providing extraordinary service to our Citizens and the development industry. This progress makes it evident that the Department is capable of performing the function well within the established form or structure of the permitting process. As a functional example,the Department delivers prompt review of permit applications and maintains a continual line of communication with applicants to resolve issues that arise during the permitting process. As to form improvements,the Growth Management Department has a history of collaborating with the development industry in order to anticipate emerging needs of the industry and to identify areas where our permitting process can be streamlined. These improvements have been successful,while at the same time the Department strives to maintain the integrity of County processes to ensure that new development complements the existing community in a harmonious manner. This proposal introduces a margin of functional flexibility at the structural level for a strictly limited number of"Qualified Economic Development Projects",to improve Growth Management and Economic Development staffs efforts to strengthen our community's business diversity and overall wellbeing. In conclusion,the Office of Business& Economic Development is fully aligned with Growth Management's commitment to consistently providing prompt reviews of all projects and maintaining a superior level of service in the normal course of all projects that submit for permitting. The expedited review process for"Qualified Economic Development Projects"as proposed will enhance the community's economic development strategy by working within the Growth Management Department parameters,allowing staff the discretion to assist economic development projects without compromising the County's ability to continue to provide prompt reviews of all projects. 11•4011 11•4011 ENTERPRISE 1.4� FL RIDA Qualified Targeted Industries for Incentives r. t� K y,,,,,,1::,,,I, . i k �. . -``> ids - AVIATION/ HOMELAND FINANCIAL/ ,Aol€ +' LIFE SCIENCES SECURITY/ PROFESSIONAL AEROSPACE DEFENSE SERVICES Biomass& Biotechnology Modeling,Simulation AVIATION: EQUIPMENT: FINANCIAL SERVICES: Biofuels Processing Pharmaceuticals and Training Aircraft and Aircraft Optical Instruments Banking Energy Equipment Optics and Photonics Parts Manufacturing Navigation Aids Insurance Manufacturing MEDICAL DEVICES: Digital Media Maintenance Repair Ammunition Securities and Energy Storage Laboratory and and Overhaul of Investments Technologies i' Surgical Instruments Software Aircrafts Electronics Photovoltaic Electronics Navigation Diagnostic Testing PROFESSIONAL 1 Telecommunications Instrument • TRANSPORTATION: SERVICES: Environmental Manufacturing Military Vehicles Consulting Corporate Flight Simulator Shipbuilding and Headquarters Sustainable Training Repair Building Products Engineering , AEROSPACE: Legal TECHNOLOGY: ■ Space Vehicles and Computer Systems Accounting i' Guided Missile Design Consulting Manufacturing Simulation and Satellite Training Communications Space Technologies , , , ,,, Launch Operations 7 p `t�t l'IrJ is ,F F)': fit u l x f+ t*k �,i,„0, }Ps fi Cloud IT Food and Beverage Marine Sciences Automotive and Marine Materials Science Plastics and Rubber Nanotechnology Machine Tooling Businesses able to locate in other states and serving multi-state and/or international markets are targeted.Call Centers and Shared Service Centers may qualify for incentives if certain economic criteria are met.Retail activities,utilities,mining and other extraction or processing businesses,and activities regulated by the Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation are statutorily excluded from consideration.All projects are evaluated on an individual basis and therefore operating in a target industry does not automatically indicate eligibility. For additional information about Florida's business advantages, please visit Enterprise Florida's website at www.enterpriseflorida.com or call 407-956-5600. Rev.ions (q) "Target industry business" means a corporate headquarters business or any business that is engaged in one of the target industries identified pursuant to the following criteria developed by the department in consultation with Enterprise Florida, Inc.: 1. Future growth.—Industry forecasts should indicate strong expectation for future growth in both employment and output, according to the most recent available data. Special consideration should be given to businesses that export goods to, or provide services in, international markets and businesses that replace domestic and international imports of goods or services. 2. Stability.—The industry should not be subject to periodic layoffs, whether due to seasonality or sensitivity to volatile economic variables such as weather. The industry should also be relatively resistant to recession, so that the demand for products of this industry is not typically subject to decline during an economic downturn. 3. High wage.—The industry should pay relatively high wages compared to statewide or area averages. 4. Market and resource independent.—The location of industry businesses should not be dependent on Florida markets or resources as indicated by industry analysis, except for businesses in the renewable energy industry. 5. Industrial base diversification and strengthening.—The industry should contribute toward expanding or diversifying the state's or area's economic base, as indicated by analysis of employment and output shares compared to national and regional trends. Special consideration should be given to industries that strengthen regional economies by adding value to basic products or building regional industrial clusters as indicated by industry analysis. Special consideration should also be given to the development of strong industrial clusters that include defense and homeland security businesses. 6. Positive economic impact.—The industry is expected to have strong positive economic impacts on or benefits to the state or regional economies. Special consideration should be given to industries that facilitate the development of the state as a hub for domestic and global trade and logistics. The term does not include any business engaged in retail industry activities; any electrical utility company as defined in s. 366.02_(2); any phosphate or other solid minerals severance, mining, or processing operation; any oil or gas exploration or production operation; or any business subject to regulation by the Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Any business within NAICS code 5611 or 5614, office administrative services and business support services, respectively, may be considered a target industry business only after the local governing body and Enterprise Florida, Inc., make a determination that the community where the business may locate has conditions affecting the fiscal and economic viability of the local community or area, including but not limited to, factors such as tow per capita income, high unemployment, high underemployment, and a lack of year-round stable employment opportunities, and such conditions may be improved by the location of such a business to the community. By January 1 of every 3rd year, beginning January 1, 2011, the department, in consultation with Enterprise Florida, Inc., economic development organizations, the State University System, local governments, employee and employer organizations, market analysts, and economists, shall review and, as appropriate, revise the list of such target industries and submit the list to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Co -rer County Growth Management Department To: Development Services Advisory Committee From: Jeremy Frantz,Senior Planner, Development Review Division Date: Tuesday, November 24,2015 Re: Architectural and Site Design Standards LDC Amendment On July 24, 2012,the Board of County Commissioners created the Architectural and Site Design Standards Ad Hoc Committee (Ad Hoc Committee)to review the architectural standards in the Land Development Code(LDC)and make recommendations for updates and revisions.The Ad Hoc Committee has met over the past two years to review the architectural standards and has proposed an LDC amendment which makes comprehensive changes to LDC section 5.05.08.Additionally,several cross- references are proposed throughout the LDC to improve awareness of the architectural standards. The DSAC-LDR subcommittee has reviewed the proposed amendment and recommended approval of the amendment with several recommended revisions for the Ad Hoc Committee's consideration. On Nov. 16,2015,the Ad Hoc Committee incorporated the DSAC-LDR Subcommittee's recommendations in the amendment request.The DSAC-LDR recommendations and the current amendment request are available on the LDC amendments website under the heading, "Amendments to Architecture and Site Design Standards." Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jeremy Frantz ieremyfrantz @colliergov.net (239)252-2305 Co ie-r County Growth Management Department To: Development Services Advisory Committee From: Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner, Development Review Division Alexandra Sulecki,Coordinator,Conservation Collier Program Date: Tuesday, November 24,2015 Re: Report from DSAC-LDR Conservation Collier Subcommittee On July 7, 2015,the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to work with the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (CCLAAC)and the Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC)to provide options to increase the long-term management endowment for management costs related to the acceptance of properties donated to Conservation Collier to satisfy off-site native vegetation preservation options established in LDC section 3.05.07. The DSAC-LDR Conservation Collier Subcommittee met on October 19 and November 12 and made the following recommendations to alter the endowment process: 1) Adjust the monetary payment allowed in LDC section 3.05.07 H.1.f.iii.a using the following formula(note:all costs are per acre): Average Conservation Collier Purchases $32,800 Estimated Management Endowment Cost $13,200 Initial Exotic Removal Cost $ 4,000 Total $50,000 2) Adjust the management endowment required for land donations allowed in LDC section 3.05.07 H.1.f.iii.b using the following formula(note:all costs are per acre): Estimated Management Endowment Cost $13,200 Initial Exotic Removal Cost $ 4,000 Total $17,200 The costs included in this proposal provide for over 50 years of management but assume that the management costs are reduced after 5 years from approximately$558 to$141 per acre, however,staff is not confident that this reduction in costs will be realized. Therefore,the Subcommittee recommended that both formulas should be re-evaluated every three years to reflect any necessary adjustments to the management endowment. For more information regarding these recommendations, visit the LDC amendments website and click the meeting materials listed under the 12/2/15 DSAC Meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Richard Henderlong richardhenderlong@colliergov.net (239)252-2464