DSAC Agenda 11/04/2015 ffi =b b
DSA. 0
Meeting
November 4, 2015
3:00 PM
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Growth Management Department
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
November 4, 2015
3:00 p.m.
Conference Room 610
NOTICE:
Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman
adjusts the time. Speakers are required to fill out a "Speaker Request Form," list the topic they wish to
address, and hand it to the Staff member seated at the table before the meeting begins. Please wait to be
recognized by the Chairman, and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation before
commenting. During discussion,Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker.
Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please leave the
room to conduct any personal business. All parties participating In the public meeting are to observe
Roberts Rules of Order, and wait to be recognized by the Chairman. Please speak one at a time and into the
microphone so the Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made.
I. Call to Order-Chairman
II. Approval of Agenda
III. Approval of Minutes from October 7,2015
IV. Public Speakers
V. Staff Announcements/Updates
A. Code Enforcement Division update—[Danny Condomina]
B. Public Utilities Department update—[Tom Chmelik or designee]
C. Growth Management Department Transportation Engineering Division &Planning Division updates—[Jay
Ahmad or designee]
D. Collier County Fire Review update—[Shawn Hanson andlor Shar Hingson]
E. North Collier Fire Review update—[Eloy Ricardo]
F. Operations& Regulatory Mgmt. Division update—[Ken Kovensky]
G. Development Review Division update—[Matt McLean]
VI. New Business
Note: Time certain for 3:30:
A. Reducing peak stormwater discharge rates in additional basins(sub-basins)[Jerry Kurtz]
B. Incentive Review Table Summer 2015[Kimberley Grant]
C. Discuss contractor form, cancellation form, authorization form [Jon Walsh]
VII. Old Business
VIII. Committee Member Comments:
IX. Adjourn
Next Meeting Dates
December 2,2015 GMD Conference Room 610—3:00 pm
January 6,2016 GMD Conference Room 610—3:00 pm
February 3, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610—3:00 pm
Page 1 of 1
October 7,2015
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, October 7, 2015
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on
this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management
Department Building, Conference Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida, with the following members present:
Chairman: William J. Varian
Vice Chairman: Blair Foley
David Dunnavant
James E. Boughton
Clay Brooker
Dalas Disney
Chris Mitchell
Robert Mulhere
Mario Valle (Excused)
Stan Chrzanowski
Norman Gentry
Marco Espinar (Excused)
Ron Waldrop
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn
Jeremy Sterk
ALSO PRESENT: David Wilkison, Department Head
Jamie French, Deputy Administrator
Judy Puig, Operations Analyst, Staff Liaison
Nathan Beals, Project Manager, Public Utilities
Danny Condomina, Code Enforcement
Jay Ahmad, Director, Transportation Engineering
Matt McLean, Manager, Development Review
Rich Long, Plans Review and Inspections Manager
Claudine Auclair, Manager, Business Center
Ken Kovensky, Director, Operations and Regulatory Management
Stephanie Amann, Manager, Financial & Operational Support
Amy Patterson, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program
Management
1
October 7,2015
Mike Ossorio, Licensing Compliance Supervisor
Jeremy Franz, Senior Planner
Jack McKenna, County Engineer
Jonathon Walsh, Building Official
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
room the Collier County Growth Management Department—Contact Mr. Evy Ybaceta at 239-252-2400.
I. Call to Order- Chairman
Chairman Varian called the meeting to order at 3:00pm
II. Approval of Agenda
Mr.Mulhere moved to approve the Agenda subject to hearing item VLD before V.C. Second by Mr.
Disney. Carried unanimously 8-0.
Mr. Dunnavant, Mr. Gentry and Mr. Boughton arrived at 3:03pm
III. Approval of Minutes from September 2,2015 Meeting
Mr. Chrzanowski moved to approve the minutes of the September 2, 2015 meeting as presented.
Second by Mr. Foley. Carried unanimously 11 -0.
IV. Introduction [David Wilkison, GMD Department Head]
Mr. Wilkinson,new GMD Department Head introduced himself to the Committee.
Ms. Spurgeon DeJohn arrived at 3:05pm
V. Public Speakers
None
VI. DSAC Position Vacancy update &vote
• Marco Espinar-renewing
• Blair Foley—renewing
• Norman Gentry—renewing
• Mario Valle—renewing
• Laura DeJohn—renewing
• Ron Waldrop-renewing
• Ryan White -new
Staff reported there are 6 Members terms expiring in December and the above identified individuals
have applied to be appointed or re-appointed to the Development Services Advisory Committee.
Mr. Dunnavant moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners appoint Marco Espinar to
the Development Services Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Carried unanimously 12—
0.
2
October 7, 2015
Mr. Chrzanowski moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners appoint Blair Foley to
the Development Services Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Boughton. Carried unanimously 11
—0. Mr. Foley abstained.
Mr. Chrzanowski moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners appoint Norman Gentry
to the Development Services Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Brooker. Carried unanimously 11
—O. Mr. Gentry abstained.
Mr. Mulhere moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners appoint Mario Valle to the
Development Services Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Disney. Carried unanimously 12—0.
Mr. Foley moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners appoint Laura Spurgeon
DeJohn to the Development Services Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Mulhere. Carried
unanimously 11—0. Ms. Spurgeon DeJohn abstained.
Mr. Foley moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners appoint Ron Waldrop to the
Development Services Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Gentry. Carried unanimously 11—0.
Mr. Waldrop abstained.
VII. Staff Announcements/Updates
A. Code Enforcement Division update— [Danny Condamina]
Mr. Condamina provided the report"Collier County Code Enforcement Department Blight
Prevention Program- Cumulative Code Enforcement statistics- 7/2009—9/27/15"for information
purposes. The Division continues to work on public outreach initiatives to reduce the potential for
code violations.
B. Public Utilities Division update— [Tom Chmelik or designee]
Nathan Beals reported will address the Committee under item VIII.A.
C. Growth Management Department/Transportation Engineering and/or Planning— [Jay Ahmad
or designee]
Mr. Ahmad reported:
• US41/Collier Blvd. Intersection—work ongoing and to be completed by November 1,2015.
• Golden Gate Parkway,East of Wilson Blvd.—clear and grub underway with construction to
begin early in 2016.
• Collier Blvd, Green Blvd. to Golden Gate Parkway—Construction for widening of roadway
on schedule.
• Chokoloskee Bridge reconstruction—"bid opening"anticipated for October 26,2015.
D. County Fire Review update— [Shar Hingson and/or Shawn Hanson]
Ms. Hingson reported:
• There is a high demand for construction inspection and Staff is undertaking measures to
address the activity.
• Lee and Collier County held a joint Arson Task Force Workshop.
• There was structural fire training on a building donated by the Naples Botanical Garden.
3
October 7, 2015
• There will be an Open House at the Horseshoe Drive facility on October 20,2015 from
2:00pm—4:00pm.
• As of January 1, 2015,the owner of buildings 3 stories or higher is required to engage a 3rd
party private vendor to complete the fire stop inspections.
E. North Naples Fire Review update—[Eloy Ricardo]
Mr. Ricardo reported Staff continues to review internal policies to determine any changes that may
be made to stream line the permit/inspection process.
Mr. Mitchell arrived at 3:20pm
F. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt.Division update [Ken Kovensky]
Mr.Kovensky submitted the"Collier County September 2015 Monthly Statistics"which outlined
the building plan and land development review activities. The following was noted during his
report:
• Stephanie Arnann is the new Finance and Operations Manager.
• Permit applications and the related building inspections continue to trend at an all time high
with each inspector typically conducting 20 -25 inspections daily.
• The NOVA contract for outside services(as needed) is expiring early next year and will be
going out to bid in November. Staff anticipates an increase in rates for the services
requested.
• The BCC approved the addition of two multi trade inspectors and Staff is undertaking the
measures to fill the positions.
• Upgrades to the CityView portal have been completed including expanded notifications for
inspection scheduling by phone or email.
• Staff is reviewing the CityView website to determine any changes which may be made to
ensure it is user friendly(log in process,contact info, etc.).
G. Development Review Division update [Matt McLean]
Mr. McLean reported Staff is replacing two vacated positions (Landscape Review and
Architectural Review). They continue the Program to partner with the industry through meetings to
determine any issues that may be addressed to streamline the processes.
VI. New Business
A. Refresher on Disclosures [Matt McLean]
Mr.McLean reminded Committee Members they are required to abstain from items, including
Land Development Code amendments if they have a direct conflict in the matter.
B. Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Study [Amy Patterson]
Ms. Patterson presented the "Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study"which outlined proposed
Impact Fee Rates and the backup document"Collier County "Parks and Recreation Impact Fee
Update Study Final Report"prepared by Tindale Oliver and Associates dated September 25, 2015.
She reported Mr. Valle could not be present,but submitted 4 comments for consideration to be
discussed at the meeting as follows:
1. The proposal was developed absent of an updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
Committee
4
October 7,2015
Concern the Plan is outdated and there is no clear indication of how the increase in proposed fees
is to be spent.
Staff
• The Master Plan was adopted in 2011 and the proposed rates are linked to the most recent
Annual Update Inventory Report.
• Some of the funds will be used to pay prior debt service obligations and Big Corkscrew
Regional Park is the next park in line to be constructed.
• The Master Plan will be updated and the debt service payments are mainly for the costs
incurred for North Collier Regional Park.
• Parks by nature are not self sustaining from the revenues they generate and require
funding sources outside the user fees to operate.
2. No correlation in the proposed rates with the level of service proposed.
Committee
• Concern the County adopted a Level of Service that does not account for lands held by
the Federal and Local Government(Everglades National Park,Beaches, etc.). These
lands are available for use by the public that should be utilized in the analysis.
• Local schools have expanses of land available for public use but remain unopened to the
public which may contribute to the Level of Service as well.
• Including these lands in the analysis may assist in reducing the burden on the County for
provision of recreational opportunities.
• The County should consider developing a"de facto"Level of Service for information
purposes that includes all lands available for public use.
• Concern the equity of the system as impact fees are assessed against a select group of the
County population,while the benefits are derived by all residents.
• Concern on the basis used for the land cost estimate does it include the amount of lands
in the existing inventory available for expanded services.
Staff
The Level of Service as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners is embedded in the
proposed Impact Fees and the Parks and Recreation Division does have interlocal agreements
with the School District for public use of the properties,mainly Elementary schools.
3. The expenditure of the fees should be linked to the geographic area the fees were generated.
Committee
The funds should be expended in the geographic area they are being generated to directly benefit
those paying.
Staff
• Historically,the County balances the needs throughout the County when expending the
funds.
• The fees generated in the Estates area did help fund North Collier Regional Park.
• The Big Corkscrew Regional Park is the next park in line to be constructed which will be
funded from monies received throughout the County.
5
October 7, 2015
• Regional parks do draw users from the entire County and benefit all residents given the
large variation of activities available at the sites.
• The construction of Manatee Park and Vanderbilt Beach Little League facility are on the
horizon.
• Eagle Lakes Park now has a community center with an Aqua Center planned for the
facility.
4. Concern Impact fees were deferred during the downturn and the reinstatement to previous levels
should offset the need for a percentage increase.
DSAC Subcommittee Members reported they reviewed the item,however the emphasis was on fact
finding with no recommendation forwarded to the full Committee for consideration.
Staff noted the item will be heard by the BCC and queried if the Committee wants to make a
recommendation on the item.
Mr. Mulhere moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners adopt the "Parks and
Recreation Impact Fee Update"subject to consideration being given to reducing the Level of
Service based on other considerations such as the availability of private and public lands in the
County for recreation and those facilities located at County School lands. Second by Mr.
Brooker.
Discussion occurred noting the Board of County Commissioners cannot alter the Level of Service
unless there is a legal impediment. Parties previously paid impact fees based on an adopted Level of
Service and would anticipate the funds will be expended to meet those needs.
Barry Williams,Director,Parks and Recreation suggested the motion be formulated to
recommend the analysis on potentially reducing the adopted Levels of Service be undertaken during
the next AUIR review.
Mr. Mulhere amended the motion to recommending the Board of County Commissioners adopt
the "Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Update"subject to consideration being given to reducing
the Level of Service based on other considerations such as the availability of private and public
lands in the County for recreation and those facilities located at County School lands. Said
analysis for a reduction being undertaken during the next AUIR update. Second by Mr. Brooker.
Motion carried 8 "yes"—5 "no." Mr.Disney,Mr. Foley,Mr. Gentry,Mr. Chrzanowski and Mr.
Dunnavant voted "no."
D. Updates,forms and policy [Jonathan Walsh] (this item was heard before item C)
Mr. Walsh reported he is developing"Bulletins"to assist in educating the public on the
requirements for specific activities. He submitted the following Drafts (Florida Building Code 5"
Edition (2014) -Bulletin #4 Solar Permits; Florida Building Code 5t"Edition (2014) -Bulletin #5:
Change in Design Professional; Florida Building Code 5t"Edition (2014) -Bulletin #6: Threshold
Projects; Florida Building Code 5th Edition (2014)—Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
Requirements; Permit by Affidavit and Certificate of Completion by Affidavit)which he is working
on and updated the Committee on the rationale for the endeavor.
6
October 7, 2015
He is also updating the County's"FAQ for Building Review"and Members with suggestions for
items to be included should contact Staff.
Sub Affirmation Forms
Mr.Walsh reported Staff is reviewing the process to determine any changes required for the forms
as copies and faxes are accepted,however they are receiving a high volume of forms that appear to
be"robo notarized."
Notice of Commencement
Mr. Walsh noted the forms may be filed at with the Growth Management Department and the
County Clerks Office. They are reviewing the process to ensure all details are properly addressed
when the forms are submitted, especially given the County Clerk's Office do not typically deal with
these forms and may not be aware of the specific requirements to be included in a valid notice.
C. Notice of Commencement& Permit Applications [Claudine Auclair]
Ms.Auclair reported the item was addressed under item VI.C.
E. Architectural and Site Design Standards [Jeremy Frantz]
Mr. Frantz addressed the Council noting the Architectural and Site Design Standards Committee
was appointed by the Board of County Commissioners to review and recommend changes to Section
5.05.08 of the Land Development Code. The Committee met over the period of two years and their
review was completed in September of 2015. He requested the proposed amendment be remanded
to the Land Development Code Subcommittee for their review and recommendation.
The Committee determined Mr. Foley,Mr.Disney and Mr.Mulhere should sit on the
Subcommittee for this item.
VIII. Old Business
A. Update on subcommittee for Preliminary Utilities acceptance process [Jack McKenna]
Mr.McKenna and Mr.Beals provided an update on the Subcommittee noting they held their initial
meeting and identified topics to be addressed in the process. The County Attorney's Office will be
involved given many of items have legal ramifications given the County is accepting infrastructure
from private parties.
IX. Committee Member Comments
None
X. Adjourn
Next Meeting Dates
November 4, 2015 GMD Conference Room 610—3:00 pm
December 2, 2015 GMD Conference Room 610—3:00 pm
January 6, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610—3:00 pm
February 3, 2016 GMD Conference Room 610—3:00 pm
7
October 7,2015
There being no further business for the good of the County,the meeting was adjourned by the order
of the Chair at 5:07PM.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Chairman,William Varian
These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on , as presented , or as
amended
8
Collier County Code Enforcement Department
Blight Prevention Program
Cumulative Code Enforcement statistics
7/2009-10/25/2015:
Amount of Fines Waived (BCC,CEB,OSM)since July 2009 $29,123.852.08
Department Performance Statistics 1 Week 4 Week Cumulative
FY16
10/19/15-10/25/15 10/1/15—10/25/15
Number of Code Cases Opened 177 557 557
Number of Educational Patrol Visits 154 561 561
Number of Code Case Property Inspections 616 2012 2012
Number of Cases Closed with Voluntary Compliance 60 167 167
Number of Community Meet and Greet events 4 9 9
Number of Community Clean-up Events 1 2 2
Number of Abandoned Home Sweeps 1 3 3
Number of Other Sweeps 1 3 3
Code Enforcement Board and Special Magistrate 0 15 15
Orders
Number of Liens Filed 0 0 0
Number of Nuisance Abatements Processed 26 70 70
Amount of Fines Waived (BCC,CEB,OSM) $0.00 $1,051,965.00 $1,051,965.00
New Bankruptcy Filing Notifications 0 0 0
Number of Bankruptcy Documents Received 0 8 8
Number of Cases Affected by Bankruptcy 4 3 3
Number of Requests for Property Payoff Requests 10 27 27
Number of Requests for Property Lien Searches 182 537 537
Number of open code cases included in Lien Search 4 15 15
Results
Number of Cases Open due to Lien Search 0 0 0
Number of Permits Issued:Garage Sale, Recreational 50 157 157
Vehicle
Number of Citations processed from DAS, PU, PR,SO, 56 167 167
&CE
Average Time from Complaint to Completion of Initial 1.5 1.5 1.5
Inspection
Average Number of Code Cases Per Investigator 45 34 34
Open Cases by District
Golden Gate—246
East Naples-212
Immokalee—206
Golden Gate Estates—193
North Naples—246
Total Open Cases—1,103
For period of: 10/19/15-10/25/15
Report by Case Type
Animal—1
Accessory Use—1
Commercial-0
Land Use-6
Noise—
Nuisance Abatement—23
Occupational License—0
Parking Enforcement-0
Property Maintenance—5
Protected Species-0
Right of Way-12
Sign—2
Site Development-9
Snipe Sign-96
Temporary Land Use-1
Vehicle—15
Vehicle for Hire-0
Vegetation Removal-4
Total-177
Complaint Reported by:
1 Week 4 Week Since BCC policy 3/12/13
10/19/15-10/25/15 10/1/15-10/25/15
1 3 308
Elected Official
Anonymous accepted 1 1 81
Anonymous not accepted 0 4 808
pursuant to BCC policy
Code Enforcement Department Monthly Report
September 2015 Highlights
• Cases opened: 856
• Cases closed due to voluntary compliance: 214
• Property inspections: 2,550
• Education patrol visits: 894
• Lien searches requested: 814
Trends
Cases opened per Month
1200
0 v o I
1000 m n 'at °n a' ° ai ten_ ..
�.a oo °° ocos
a, o 00
800 N o `° ^ ^ o
600 U111111111PT I
111111111I11111111111II
400
200 11111111111111111111111
0 11111111111111111111111
m m m v cr v Cr Cr v Cr in in in Ln in in in in in
> C .Q ra 0 T C OD Q +'' > U C ..Q i �- T C CD Q
0 Z Q LL 2 Q ro < N O o a) u- < cc � ai
Code Inspections per Month
In 11"1 l0
ll1 --r0
3000 m N
vs.
nw�i N _ o rn co ._rn N N
2500 zit; N N ._. v 1 1 N o N 16. fl
1-1 03
200011111111111111111111111
1500 11111111111111111111111
1000 1111111111111111111111
500 11111111111111111111111
0
m m m d V v v v v ct ct In In In to In to In IJ to
u -_, — Q cn O Z 0 ca ii 2 < < N
Total Code Cases by FY
12000
10000 10573
8000 8319
6000
5839
9026
4000
2000
0
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
7000 1
6391 6417
6000
5044
5000 4713
4156 �.. Origin of Case
4000
{
I .Code Div.Initiated
'1 Complaint Initiated
3000 f
2000
1000
0
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
Community Caretaking List Monthly Totals
1200
1000
800
600
400 111111111
200
0
m m v v v v v v v Ln ul ul 141 ui ul u�
z o -° LL g¢ a Ntnao Z o `° Li 2 a E 2 - Q cn O
Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma Apr Ma Jun Jul-Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma Apr Ma Jun Jul-Aug Sep Oct
-13 -13 -14 -14 14 -14 4 -14 14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -15 -15 15 -15 15 -15 15 -15 -15 -15
■Series1 976 104 109 104 989 927 881 805 756 690 591 581 539 509 463 425 410 386 379 415 400 387 382 367
Stormwater Planning
Growth Management Department
C r Col,
+»ty
Read Ahead Information for the:
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
November 4, 2015 Meeting
New Business Item VIA
Reducing Peak Stormwater Discharge Rates in Additional Basins— Proposed
Amendment of Ordinance 2001-27
Presented By: Jerry Kurtz, P.E.
BACKGROUND:
The Collier County Growth Management Plan, particularly the Drainage and Natural Groundwater
Aquifer Recharge sub-elements of the Public Facilities Element, requires that the drainage
systems have adequate stormwater management capacity at the time a development permit is
issued, and that the system be designed "to ensure that the final outlet point has the adequate
capacity to handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions
present at the time of design". The ordinances also state that "allowable off-site discharge rates
shall be computed using a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency."
Accordingly, the County had established maximum allowable off-site discharge rates for several
of the basins served by the drainage canal network per ordinance 1990-01, and revised by
Ordinance 2001-27. These ordinances set an allowable discharge rate of 0.15 cfs/acre for all
areas in the County, except for six basins and sub-basins that are subject to specific discharge
limitations.
The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the 1989 Collier County Comprehensive
Plan required that the County develop a watershed management plan by January 1993. After
postponement for several years, the Board of County Commissioners sponsored development of
a comprehensive Collier County Watershed Management Plan (CCWMP) and accepted it in
2011. The unit discharge rates adapted in the earlier ordinances were based on preliminary
hydraulic analyses. Detailed hydraulic modeling for evaluation of the design storm conveyance
capacity of the canal network performed as a part of the CCWMP updated the maximum allowable
discharge rates for all of the basins. In the interim two additional detailed stormwater management
master plans, developed jointly by SFWMD and the County for the Belle Meade and lmmokalee
areas in 2005, recommended limiting discharge rates for the basins/sub-basins within those
planning areas.
Therefore, an amendment to Ordinance 2001-27 is necessary to meet the long standing
commitments of the Growth Management Plan by incorporating the limiting discharge rates
proposed in CCWMP and the two stormwater master plans. The changed limiting discharge rates
may lead to slight cost increases to new developments in a few selected basins. However, the
following benefits should outweigh any cost impact to new land development activities.
• Improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by SFWMD and County
operated canals
• Enhanced Groundwater Recharge Potential
• Restored Hydrology and wetlands hydroperiod
• Water Quality Improvement of receiving waters
Page 1of2
Stormwater Planning
Growth Management Department
Co er cmnatty
• Reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries
• Gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting (SFWMD and County).
The proposed Ordinance 2001-27 changes are indicated below in strice-through and underline
format.
Current Six Specific Discharge Limitation Basins Rate
1. Airport Road North Sub-Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
(North of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
2. Airport Road South Sub-basin 0.06 cfs/acre
(South of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
3. Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
4. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
5. Harvey Basin 0.05 0.06 cfs/acre (Recommend
rounding off to hundredths place)
6. Wiggins Pass Basin 0.13 cfs/acre
Proposed Additional Basins
7. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
(North of Sabal Palm Rd.)
8. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin
(South of Sabal Palm Road) 0.04 cfs/acre
9. Immokalee Master Plan Area (East of 0.05 cfs/acre
SR 29)
10. Immokalee Master Plan Area (West of 0.10 cfs/acre
SR 29)
11. CR 951 North Canal Basin 0.11 cfs/acre
12. C4 Basin 0.11 cfs/acre
13. Corkscrew Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
14. Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
15. Faka Union Canal Basin (North of 1-75) 0.09 cfs/acre
16. Gordon River Extension Basin 0.09 cfs/acre
17. 1-75 Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
18. Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin 0.12 cfs/acre
19. Lely Manor Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
20. Main Golden Gate Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
21. Palm River Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre
22. Pine Ridge Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre
All other conditions of Ordinance 2001-27 will remain in effect.
Page 2 of 2
2015
BCC Collier County
Affordable Housing Advisory
Committee,Community and Human
Services Division,Growth
Management Department
DRAFT 2015 INCENTIVE REVIEW
AND RECOMMENDATION REPORT]]
THIS DRAFT IS NOT A FINALIZED DRAFT. VERY IMPORTANT. THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MEETS AGAIN AT 8 AM ON FRIDAY 10/30/15. THEREFORE,THE ATTACHED DOES NOT CONTAIN THE FINAL
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE. DUE TO THE DEADLINE TO PREPARE DOCUMENTS FOR THE DSAC
MEETING,THE LAST PUBLISHED DRAFT IS BEING SUPPLIED TO GENERATE DISCUSSION. THE AHAC AND STAFF
WELCOME FURTHER INPUT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY.
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
Executive Summary
In March 2015, staff of the Community and Human Services Division (CHS) along with the Affordable Housing Advisory
Committee (AHAC) presented at an Affordable Workforce Housing workshop held by the Board of County
Commissioners(BCC). Key data was provided that included*:
• There is a projected need for additional affordable workforce rental units to maintain currency with population
increases
• Recognition that housing is affordable to a household when no more than 30% of its income is designated for
housing related costs,whether rental or owned
• 43% of Collier residents spend more than 30% on housing, and about half of that group (22%) actually spend
more than 50%of their income on housing
• About 2/3 of the County population has a household income of less than approximately $70,000 which would
likely allow them to get into a home at approximately$200,000
• That monthly rental rates have been rising, and there are very low vacancy rates
• That long term data shows we are heading into the same situation we had in the mid to late 2000's with income
relatively flat and housing prices rising quickly,therefore reducing overall affordability
As follow up to the workshop, in June 2015, the BCC approved (1)the Affordable/Workforce Housing Population Based
Index Model Methodology, (2) reinstatement of the suspended Impact Fee Deferral Program for single family
residences, (3) direction to retain previously approved density bonus units in Planned Unit Developments, and (4)
directing staff to work with AHAC and the community to bring back parameters for Gap Housing. At the workshop,they
had also requested staff work with the AHAC, and all interested parties, in development of additional incentives for
affordable workforce housing to be presented for their approval no later than December 2015**.
Since that time the AHAC and staff have held several public committee meetings, conducted extensive research, and
developed the following draft slate of affordable workforce housing incentives and programs. Specifically, the AHAC
held a public forum on Friday,August 14th to obtain public input on the incentives being considered at that time. There
was a broad invitation distribution listing, and good response. It was noted after the forum that the development
community was under represented, so staff and AHAC requested to meet with the Development Services Advisory
Committee (DSAC) on November 4th, and members of the Collier Building Industry Association (CBIA) in November, to
obtain their input. Staff also presented to the Chamber of Commerce Public Policy committee on this topic, and at a
United Way sponsored Affordable Workforce Housing Forum on October 1st. At that event, many large employers and
many elected officials were represented, showing their interest in this topic, as well as interest in working together
toward a solution set.
The following draft slate of incentives and programs is segmented into three categories: (1) Maintain or enhance
current incentives and programs, (2) New Incentives Recommended, and (3) Do not pursue. Within the first two
categories, they are further given an A-B-C level priority. The reader will see that the new recommendations, in most
cases, require further study and or definition prior to implementation, if the BCC recommends moving forward.
*Data and presentation available upon request
**As a recipient of SHIP funds, the County must submit a report triennially identifying their priorities for furthering
affordable workforce housing. The County must submit the next report by December 2015. This does not preclude
further analysis or solutions after this date.
V. 3 1028015
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
Incentive Description Existing Incentives and AHAC Recommendation
?
n o ¢ AHAC Review Comments
MAINTAIN OR ENHANCE CURRENT INCENTIVES
A Y Expedited Permitting— In 2010-2011,Collier County refined the building Maintain current incentive,plus NEW
The processing of permit process and performance measures were
approvals of developed to facilitate the expedited performance and (1) Also provide expedited review for multi-family,
development orders or allow the county to closely monitor its performance senior housing,and Medicaid assisted housing
permits,as defined in and adherence to this policy.The current permit permits using state or federal funds receive
Sec.163.3164(7)and process is review within 5,10,or 15 days for various priority within the existing approved Growth
(8),F.S.for affordable permit types,or a portion of the permit fee will be Management Department procedures.
housing projects is refunded. Affordable Housing development projects
expedited to a greater are given priority for processing. Developers in the
degree than other community are aware of the process through public Implementation Requires: Internal process change
projects(See Senate Bill meetings.
2011—SB 176)
The committee concluded that the current Expedited
Permitting process is sufficient and is adequately
expediting the review of development orders and
permits for affordable housing projects.
A Y Impact Fee Waivers or Individuals or organizations constructing new Maintain Current Incentive plus NEW:
Modifications—The affordable housing units to benefit very low-and low-
modification of impact- income persons and households are eligible for the (1) Explore options to establish a funding source.
fee requirements, deferral of impact fees per LDC Sec 74-401. Such fund may be used for future deferred impact
including reduction or fees for owner occupied dwelling units.
waiver of fees and Collier County Resolution No.2008-97,provided (2) Extend future impact deferral to include Multi-
alternative methods of Board of County Commissioner direction on family,senior housing,and Medicaid assisted
fee payment for restricting the use of the remaining funds for deferral housing.
affordable housing of County Impact Fee for single family homeowners (3) Explore options to be able to retain existing AH
who occupied affordable housing units.The County units to prevent a decrease of AH units over time by
had suspended the program for use with single family renewing or extending incentives,in exchange for
development. On June 23,2015 the BCC accepted a the AH unit remain affordable under the
recommendation to reinstate the impact fee deferral requirements and obligations of AH agreements.
program for single family residences,so it is now (4) Consider an impact fee reduction based on
available for single and multi family residences. locality of activity centers;must a=be accompanies
by determination of a funding source to cover the
reduction
(5) Consider increasing the length of the waiver
(currently 10 years)to maintain affordability of units
for a longer period of time
Implementation Requires: Further study and
analysis to develop firm parameters,followed by
LDC and ordinance changes.
V.3 1028015
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
A Y Density Flexibility— The developer may request increased density when Maintain current incentive plus NEWI:
The allowance of including a affordable housing in the proposed
flexibility in densities for development via the Affordable Housing Density (1) Find a way for this to be coupled with the density
affordable housing Bonus Program,codified by Ordinance No.04-41,as bands to incent more affordable housing in the
Land Development Code(LDC)2.06.00 et seq,which density bands
density bonus can only be granted by the
Commission and utilized by the Developer in
accordance with the strict limitations and applicability Implementation Requires: Further study and
of said provisions. analysis to develop firm parameters,followed by
LDC changes.
The County currently has processes and procedures
that allow for the Developers to have additional input
and feedback for projects, early in the process,
including a NIMS meeting to allow for public
contribution and involvement,to be able to address
possible issues and/or concerns.This increases
certainty of the outcome.
A Y Accessory Dwelling Not specifically a current incentive. Maintain current quest house code,only
Units-The allowance of
affordable residential However,the committee concluded that the use of
units in residential zoning these units,sometimes referred to as mother-in-law
districts suites,already exists in the code under the term
"guest cottage". These can be affordable to meet the
needs of elderly relatives as a means of affordable
housing.
Should ADU be pursued,the Land Development
Code(LDC)and the Comprehensive Plan would have
to be examined to identify current policies that would
negatively impact or restrict their use;also difficult to
evaluate infrastructure needs with ADU's and difficult
to determine the impact on roads.
There is offsetting potential to collect impact fees on
the accessory dwelling.The committee recognizes
that this is a best practice across the country.
A Y Parking and Setbacks— The county has an existing variance procedure Maintain current incentive
The reduction of parking whereby developers may request reduction of parking
and setback and setback requirements for all, including affordable
requirements for housing
affordable housing
Deviations occur when the reduction of parking and
setback requirements may reduce the costs of
providing affordable housing.
The County also has a deviation for Immokalee?
V. 3 1028015
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
A Y Flexible Lot Zero lot configuration requirements for affordable Maintain current incentive
Configurations—The housing are considered as deviations in the PUD
allowance of flexible lot approval process and variances in the conventional
configurations,including zoning process,on a case by case basis.
zero-lot-line
configurations for
affordable housing
A Y Street Requirements— Street requirements for affordable housing are Maintain current incentive
The modification of street considered as deviations in the PUD approval
requirements for process and variances in the conventional zoning
affordable housing process,on a case by case basis.
A Y Oversight(Ongoing)— An ongoing process for review of local policies, Maintain current incentive
The establishment of a ordinances,regulations and plan provisions that
process by which a local increase the cost of housing prior to their adoption is
government considers, in place. Collier County requires all items which have
before adoption,policies, the potential to increase the cost of housing to be
procedures,ordinances, prepared and presented to the Collier County Board
regulations,or plan of County Commissioners with the amount of the
provisions that increase increase or decrease mentioned in the executive
the cost of housing summary under fiscal impact. The County regularly
utilizes the existing entities and processes undertaken
by the AHAC,the Planning Commission,the
Development Services Advisory Committee to review
and examine impacts to the cost of housing.
A Y Land Bank Inventory— Florida Statute 125.379,Disposition of County Maintain current incentive plus NEW:
The preparation of a property for affordable housing,requires the
printed inventory of preparation of a printed inventory of locally owned (1) Broadening this to other public entities such as
locally owned public public lands suitable for affordable housing. Collier the school system,the City of Naples and the City of
lands suitable for County has completed this process and maintains a Marco Island
affordable housing list of locally owned properties. (2) Utilize the funds in the affordable housing trust
fund to consider purchase land suitable for
Resolution 2007-172 and Resolution 2010 directs affordable housing.
the use of surplus land and directs those funds
derived from the sale of such property be placed in Implementation requires: Confirmation of other
the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. jurisdictions to participate,revision of Resolution to
revise uses of funds in the Affordable Housing Trust
Fund
V.3 1028015
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
A Y Proximity—The support The County currently addresses this incentive through Maintain current incentive plus NEW:
of development near additional density offered in designated density bands
transportation hubs and and activity centers. It is noted that while this exists, (1) Recommend further incentives to develop AH
major employment the development community has not advantaged this units in specific locations throughout the County
centers and mixed-use for affordable housing. that are located within Activity Centers and
developments(activity Density Bands.(mention of less impact to
centers and density infrastructure,transportation...)
bands) (2) Possibly layer more incentives into these areas
(3) Bolster the AHDB program in these areas
(4) Consider these incentives for only those up to
80%AMI
(5) Review compatibility of design to provide further
assurances to the Development Community
Implementation Requires: Further study and
analysis to develop firm parameters,followed by
LDC changes.
NEIN INCENTIVES RECOMMENDED
A N NEW: Impact Fees for The committee considered the topic of an Impact Fee NEW
AH—Designate a for the express purpose of funding affordable housing
specific impact fee for in Collier County. The committee,after receiving (1) The committee recommends the County pursue
use towards affordable public input,considers this a viable option to address the requisite study to develop a rationally
housing initiatives for the on-going issue of meeting affordable workforce supported impact fee for the purpose of
residential and housing needs in our community. One appeal of this affordable workforce housing. It is recognized
commercial development approach is that the local government maintains this may be a lengthy process,but if adopted
control over spending plans and therefore can be could provide a long term and flexible solution
responsive to the current market and other economic to the County
conditions.
Impact fees would be placed in the affordable housing Implementation Requires: Further study and
trust fund and disbursed according to a BCC analysis to develop firm parameters,followed by
approved plan of action. adoption of the new impact fee.
A N NEW—Dedicate Not a current incentive,though via Resolution 2007- NEW
general funding 203,the County does have an affordable housing
annually to the trust fund(AHTF). (1) The committee,after receiving public input,
Affordable Housing recommends pursuit of this option. The public
Trust Fund,or by other The essence of this concept is to develop funding reaction to date was very strong in favor of this
means streams for a dedicated fund with a local plan to fund option.
affordable workforce housing in some manner.
Mitigation buyouts of other required incentives is one Implementation Requires: Further study and
optional revenue stream;general funding is one, analysis to develop methods and options,followed
impact fees dedicated to affordable housing is by creation of an implementation plan.
another;others can be developed. The local
government would establish rules and regulations as
to how the funding may be collected and allocation.
Some of the advantages are that this becomes all
local decision making and therefore can be market
and economic flexible.
V. 3 1028015
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
A N NEW—Additional Not a current incentive. NEW
Incentives for Elderly
Housing Units The committee discussed several possible options for (1) The committee recommends pursuit of these
new incentives in this arena: options
(1) Any developer targeting 55 and over gets
additional density,or possibly reduced or
deferred impact fees
(2) Any employer of a business that serves elderly Implementation Requires: Further study and
(such as assisted living facilities)would be analysis to develop firm parameters,followed by
required to pay a?????? GMP and LDC changes.
A N NEW—Require a The committee discussed the Rural Lands West NEW
certain level of development currently underway as an example of a
affordable housing in large volume of housing stock being developed with (1) The committee recommends further study and
all new developments no current plans for affordable housing. analysis
over X size (note: this
sounds like inclusionary Implementation Requires: Further study and
zoning,can we word analysis to develop methods and options,followed
properly?) by creation of an implementation plan.
B N NEW: Preservation of Most units designated as affordable have up to a 15 NEW
Existing Affordable year affordability period.
Housing—The
establishment of efforts This could take on the form of extending the term of
to preserve or elongate affordability for future designated units beyond the
timeframes for units typical 15 years.
designated as affordable
in order to reduce the This could also take on the form of funds or programs
need for additional units to rehabilitate or otherwise develop affordable
to come on-line housing already in the housing stock.
B N NEW: Linkage Fees— As the County continues its efforts to recruit new NEIN
Fees paid by new businesses,it could consider a linkage fee whereby
commercial businesses an assessment for each business would be made (1) Consider development of an affordable housing
based on their specific based on the number of affordable units their linkage fee.
need for generation of workforce would need.
new affordable housing Implementation Requires: Further study and
This has the effect of employers having a part in the analysis to develop firm parameters,followed by
solution set. adoption of the new impact fee.
B N NEW—Sustain levels Not a current incentive. NEW
of affordable housing The committee discussed the potential to partner with
in existing CRA's the CRA's on redevelopment in order to avoid This was a last minute addition to the list,without
displacement of affordable housing. ample time for serious consideration,however
deemed worthy to note.
The committee also discussed the issue of mobile
homes in our community as a viable source of
affordable housing,and the need for a method to Implementation Requires: Further study and
allow replacement units and other upgrades under the analysis to develop methods and options,followed
current code. It is the committees understanding that by creation of an implementation plan.
the Growth Management Department is currently
pursuing such alternatives.
V. 3 1028015
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
mom
B N NEW—Target County The committee recognizes the County receives and NEW
grant funds toward the distributes between$2M and$3M annually in
development or entitlement funding. The CHS staff is presently (1) The committee recommends that affordable
preservation of beginning the planning process to develop a five year housing be identified as a high priority in the
affordable housing as a plan for allocation priorities. plan,as long as the planning process supports
high priority this.
Implementation Requires: Input to the planning
process showing the needs in the community,and
eventual BCC approval of the plan and priorities in
May or June 2016.
C N NEW—Research TDR's Not a current incentive. NEW
for AH
The committee discussed the option to provide for (1) The committee recommends the County pursue
enhanced Transfer Development Rights when further study to develop a rationally supported
affordable housing in general or specifically for the basis for enhanced TDR's for the purpose of
elderly is to be constructed. One option may be to affordable workforce housing.
allow for additional units for the same price,if the
additional units are affordable.
Implementation Requires: Further study and
analysis to develop firm parameters,followed by
??????
DO NOT PURSUE
N Reservation of No current incentive. Do not activate an incentive
Infrastructure—The
reservation of The committee identified that this was not a critical
infrastructure capacity for priority however the committee may choose to re-visit
housing for very-low if there is not adequate capacity identified at a future
income persons,low time. (Note. is there more that we can add to this?)
income persons,and
moderate income
persons
N NEW—Inclusionary Not a current incentive. Do not activate an incentive
Zoning
The committee and the community are split on this
option. Most would only consider this if there were if considered,Implementation Requires: Further
also an"in lieu of'option such as a payment to the study and analysis to develop firm parameters,
affordable housing trust fund,or an option to build followed by GMP and LDC changes,
units in another location. Others felt this was the only
way to ensure units are built.
N NEW—Discounted AH Not a current incentive. Do not activate an incentive
V. 3 1028015
Draft 2015 Incentive Review and Recommendation Report
GAP Impact Fees and a
GAP Housing Trust The committee considered the topic of a Discounted The committee,after receiving public input,does not
Fund Affordable Housing(GAP)Impact Fees and a GAP recommend this incentive option. The public
Housing Fund for the purpose of assuring additional reaction to date is a lack of interest or uncertainty
Gap affordable housing is constructed in Collier about the potential for this option.
County. The essence of this concept is to tax higher
end real estate transactions,only,and use that
revenue to backfill the required impact fees;thereby
reducing the impact fee and increasing the profit to
the Gap housing developer.
N NEW—Micro Housing— Not a current incentive. Do not activate an incentive
Create local
development codes to The committee sees the appeal of this option,though
suit single family units of it raises significant concerns in terms of impact to the
less than 500 SF infrastructure of the community. Significant research
and work would be required to assess all changes in
current codes,fees,etc.even to assess feasibility.
V.3 1028015
Co ItfeT County
CHANGE OF CONTRACTOR
Permit Number: E:mail:
Date: Reasons for Change:(select one)
Contractor's Licenses No.: Li Change of Contractor only
Job Address: nChange of Contractor and Sub-Contractors
nChange of Sub-Contractors only
Change of Owner Builder
I Change of Owner Builder&Sub-Contractors
ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR:
Printed Name of Original Contractor Original Contractor's Signature
Printed Business Name: Phone#:
Original Contractor Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of in the year
Signature of Notary Public: Seal
CHANGE TO NEW CONTRACTOR:
Printed Name of New Contractor New Contractor's Signature
Printed Business Name: Phone#:
New Contractor Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of in the year
Signature of Notary Public: Seal
OWNER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
Printed Name of Owner/General Contractor Owner's/General Contractor's Signature
Phone#:
Owner/Contractor Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of in the year
Signature of Notary Public: Seal
Collier County Fax No: (239)252-2334 E-mail: PermittingPlanReview@colliergov.net
CHANGE OF CONTRACTOR/CANCELLATION OF PERMIT PROCEDURES
A Change of Contractor(s)on an issued permit(s)is requested by the Owner of record or the contractor for the permit and is accomplished
in accordance with the Florida Building Code. A building permit issued to a licensed contractor by the Building Review & Permitting
Department may be transferred to a NEW Licensed Contractor or owner builder to complete the construction. Prior to the actual transfer
of the building permit from the Original contractor to the NEW contractor or owner builder a Change of Contractor Form must be notarized
and submitted.
Owner Requested Change of Contractor or Sub-Contractor:
When an Owner requests a Change of Contractor,the Owner shall submit a completed Change of Contractor Form to the Building Review
and Inspections Department stating the reason for the change being requested.
In addition, the Owner shall submit proof to the Building Official that the contractor on record for the subject permit has been notified of
intent to change the contractor. The proof shall be either a copy of a certified registered letter sent to the contractor by the Owner together
with a copy of the Domestic Return Receipt for Certified Mail (see sample below), or the notarized Change of Contractor signed by the
Original Contractor making them aware of and has no objection to the Change of Contractor request.
QUALIFIERS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS
Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has
commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in
this jurisdiction. The permit or application fee may have additional fees imposed for failing to obtain permits prior to commencement of
construction.
The approved permit and/or permit application expires if not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, The permittee further
understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure will not be used or occupied until a certificate of
occupancy is issued. By signing this permit application, I agree that 1 have been retained by the owner/permittee to provide contracting
services for the trade for which I am listed. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting Department
should I no longer be the contractor responsible for providing said contracting services. I further agree that I understand that the review and
issuing of this permit does not exempt me from complying with all County Codes and Ordinances. It is further understood that the property
owner/permittee is the owner of the permit.
Note: If
Sample Domestic Return Receipt
".1NIrt It •
Con� WN, SRO � 0 tiara
FAM, am adw c%,ca
-nam,an, on w,. "0 Muss.••
a era;w►can,.tnntl,.a.n!ro ►.""'®.mV 1'4"
•o on gMatt boo bei allire m.Yiplsca
or on Ow kva>lspan ponied,
,,Mkr~96.600M VE AFI!E. fir'ed i1 tr Vs.
Ca 1%
John Q. Propertyowner 'AO lir
123 Any Street \TTzi,; 1., s •
'r
Wilton Manors, FL _ .
33305 o •
0 twos wt 0GOA
a rtrmmaor.,M M.%raN ow.
'MO.
H A°' 0000012345678900000
P8 Form 3871,F,truol.2004 awnMn Nwnaw.bl rol...a.-,.HMSO
When an Owner or General Contractor requests a Change of Sub-Contractor,the procedures as above apply,
Any portion of work already covered by the contractor or sub-contractor shall be suspended and no further inspections performed until a
new contractor or sub-contractor has been associated to the permit.
Fees: Processing fees will apply if permit has been issued—Any applicable fees are per the CC Growth Management Div/Planning and
Regulations Fee Schedule
Contractor Request to Withdraw from a Permitted Job:
When a contractor wants to withdraw from a permitted job without canceling the permit, the contractor shall submit proof to the Building
Official that the Owner of record has been notified,and submit a Change of Contractor form.
C° e C°mnty CANCELLATION FORM
Date: Permit#:
Primary Permit#(if applicable): Contractor:
Phone#: Address:
Contractor's Email Address:
Owner's Name:
Job Address:
Permit Description:
Permit Expiration Date: Has work commenced: ❑Yes ❑ No
(Staff will verify)
Reason for cancellation:
Refund requested (Application and review fees are non-refundable): oyes ❑ No
Signature of Licensed Contractor/Qualifier Print Name of Licensed Contractor/Qualifier
State of Florida
County
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
By: ( ) Personally known ( ) Produced Identification
Type of Identification:
Signature of Notary Public: Seal
For office use only(Staff Initials:
Cancellation granted: ( ) YES ( ) NO Date:
Reason for denial:
Refund required: ( ) YES ( ) NO
Reason for refund:
Collier County Fax No: (239)252-2334 E-mail: PermittingPlanReview@colliergov.net
. Co ier County i
2800 North Horseshoe Drive BusinessCenterFax cni,collierRov.net
Phone: (239)252-2400 Growth Management Department Fax: (239)252-3990
Authorization Form
1
This document is utilized ONLY for dropping off and pleidne an of construction plans and documents
This Authorization is: 1
ESTABLISHING or REPLACING.ALL Authorized Persons
INADDITIONto Authorized Persons
n A ONE TIME Authorization-Job Address:
f
l
t
I, ,as the Oualifier/Design Professional/License Holder for
(Print Name) (Circle One) 1
r
I
,authorize the following individual(s)to act as my agent
in dropping off
(Company Name)
and/or picking up construction plans/documents.I acknowledge that this form does not authorize another person to act or sign t
as the qualifier of this company,nor does it remove/replace any other requirements for submittal. i
Print Name of Authorized Persons)below:
1. 2. ;.
1
3. 4. 1
S. 6.
I
7. 8.
I
9. 10.
Under Penalties of perjury,I declare that I have read the foregoing document and that the facts stated in it are true.I acknowledge these statements i
by i
providing my signature and seal below or my notarized signature.
Signature: i
r•
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of , , I
1
by (name of person acknowledging). Po Ign Profe-ss'.onsI Seat Above 3
I
(Signature of Notary Public—State of Florida)
i
i
i
(Print,Type,or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) rslotary stamp placed allow:
i
l
Personally Known`OR Produced Identification_ Type of Identification Produced
l
5/27/15
SUMMARY:Authorization Form Changes 6
OBJECTIVE: Create opportunities for easier use of the form when adding,replacing, or providing one-
time authorization. The form also specifies that authorized persons cannot act as the qualifier and will
have the same submittal requirements.
CONSIDERATIONS: Contractors must provide, in writing, the names of persons authorized to act on
their behalf. They.-also frequently change staff members, hire outside companies, or send different
individuals to pick up/drop off forms, applications, drawings, etc. The current Authorization process
• doesn't provide for a simple method when modifying or adding persons to the authorized list,new options
will facilitate on-the-fly changes without significant impacts to the list of authorized persons.
CHANGES:
Formatting
Division-->Department
Options for use of form(establish/replace,add,one-time)
Language of authorization
Ability for design professionals to use the form
Design professional seal in lieu of notary
•
gF
ai
DD