The URL can be used to link to this page

PARAB Backup 06/22/1994 R Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ( PARAB ) Backup June 22 , 1994 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Thomas, Athletic Supervisor FROM: Murdo Smith, Parks and Recreation Operations Manager DATE: June 30, 1994 RE: Clay Courts I have been informed of several situations that have taken place recently that need some attention. 1. When the clay courts are to be closed for maintenance or other reasons, please contact Mr. Gil Mueller and inform him as to why and how long the courts will be closed. This should be done well in advance, if possible. 2 . The situation that occurred on Sunday, June 12 , should not happen again. If the courts are closed, every effort should be made to contact any leagues to inform them that the courts are closed. If the courts are closed and work crews are supposed to perform maintenance on the courts early in the morning and they do not show, do not assume they will show up later. Make every effort to contact maintenance to find out the condition of the court or courts in question. 3 . If a group of players have scheduled a time to play, they should not be bumped for a league. 4. Please remember that customer services are of high priority to the Department and all customers shall be treated with respect. I hope that these issues will be addressed immediately. MS/bj/11719 cc: Steve Brinkman, Parks and Recreation Director ri N I-- CO to 0 I N tf1 tO 01 0 CO In I ,-I CO 4-1 N r-1 0 CO 01 r1 CO O r-1 F-4 I I 1 a N- r-1 'Cr r-1 CO 0 0 .--1 V' N t0 In r-1 (N Cl r-4 I 1 I .. r1 1-1 }IO' 0r- Cl0c CO 0 I r- 0cDO N0 a in 0.1 0 r-1 r-1 M w � � � k.0 P-I La w a 1 o r I-1 r-1 L. 1- 1- Jj Cr Z N 0 . 0 t" CO r-1 NCONCO Cr) r) Nin Ntor-1 I c r1 Ol Cr) 10r) CO 41al cN r-- CO I Cl/-I 1/40 to N Ol to Q) to �' N In N I I 1 W r1'(! C N to CO t0 CO .-1 O t0 r) = G to cv ri at O to C c') co r-1 N to �, cal I Z w Ca W 1- H z +(' w 4 Z C. z Ca U I 0 otnNNO 0 ■- •-4.r1 1 Z s 0 >4 V to N 'r) .O 71 N 0 I� 0cotD CO0t00cn H � rn rn N n cJ' 0 01 (,) no [� mr) crar0 H o--}f Ir) r) O h -I r) n CO 0 m •o' t0 c'') C\ O 01 O El Kt '4 >1.,-I 01 O N - -1 In °' � ° cr, `nm -' ..-1 V =..• 1-41 01 n a N to N N a �. In W i r": H In In 0 0I za El R OtnN0c) N 4C:) H W Z -I Cr LC) a W Cr) he » U aJ 4 - Iy ILInU, Z 1:thj: O I n N O M N .>40 COr-1NNCO .f1Q © 0 Nr7cCtf N (-icrlNc c 1- r-1 U101N E-1 - I- 1� t0 'V' L) I-- c*7 �j Z N 0 V' N N N CD N O1 In C' O' ri to O' t0 N Z r-i V 0 H r-1 In O N CO CO N r•- CC CO N .--I N U ZI O N d N to r-cd Ci)~ C U to N ch J J > 0 c0 c0 QI 0 C' N I In to I• r) § WI OI O c0 c0 N r-1M - cr) a' 0 Cr N ■ t- '0 s .. • • 4 C Y1 • C 3 3 • C 0 0 0 41 U 7 • LA. U L •O 0 0 0 0 • rl -- • • ^1 Q Al Al • Z 0 L O a r r O L 0 — U L • • = C — U L L 0 U • c • 0 — U • N 4 Z. 4 N C L 2 17 0. .• N • • 17 — +• U = 0 0 4 0 L x • c C a C 0 U O. J w r v 4 — C 3 0 M O a C Z 0 C O 0. 4 _ O > a L N 4.1 4 4 4. 4.1 U 1 t 0 0 • W •• • 770 r C C • — .0 a. C N s • C 0 r — 0 7 3 N N L L • 0 • U — 0 0 3 0 — 4 _ 4 4 0 0 0 — 0 1 4 7 7 0 N C a J J 0 • d C C N AA • L N — C C • U — L • 0 U 0 0 L U Jt Al 0 • • 0 O 0 OY • 0 6 r 0 N • 0 7. s • L • L L • 4 4 s t r — • s • U N C • a. 0 0 • 4 0 4 0 C 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 < 0 - 0 ca a s 0 U m,0. 0. - c0 CI a N M Z UIC7 N co O O h O O O ,O O N I'•• O O P 0 N P. N 2 ► W Y .- M CU N > N W J PC C- a U /- W z 2 O 0 a O O O O O {p a d d N N N O O P O O N O P M O P. I- IA M an CO M Y N in ..- -O W V 0 I- O a0 O O P O M N O N P .t 9- N N OC .t N a0 0 .t O .— ..t. M M 2 19- I- .- 9 .- U3 IA 4 h MP N 2 H O W J Y . S ! — — N P CC OOZ O. W U Z[] O=C 0 p I- x N I- ..3. x I, CO 0 a a0 N pp.. .t M ^ A v Al N In d sr W -. F. (IC N. qg W U U 0 2 W W O. O OC Cl) W Pa La 2 U. 'Y O < •-• O .- p ^ .- 0 a- x = O t P. M N < I- I- W CO O P -z ^ Ap.... N P M Y W Y CIC OC < U i § W p IA O M CO M O In I.- CI. W W N Y OC OC U. 0 2 . = S 8 - -O A O M M N a0 N U O A 00 - CO N P 'O N .t OC P IA 'O `O .t M M .O M O W '- I, PS J J 0 U 0 N IA P O in P IA P 0 an a- M N M N O N O a0 1. IA >. Cl) 'O N g O P M O . .*t I, Y IA v 0. CU N ^ ^ P N 0 I- 0 pp ..tt .pp IA IA P N H1 4 N O .t O ! ' P Y1 A In P .- IA M vs I— Al 5— 5— O in MI In • Y 0 N N 0 p A M 2 N in 3 H I- . . . L •. me ... O ~ U N < 0 y I- u I O O N M O N O O.40 .t M 0 O P p 19. IA M .43 M at w Y .- P N 4 ■ 1 L .. u c. u IP u .= I- CO oc CO 0 J v. V O v O V- . U N = A co I- OC W W J N 7 �/ O. a. u O. O. W J 00 (� U U U U U S U I<- a. L = X V V I W I- < 0 Y L < 2 < W . 19 C7 > < at a- O. N v a0 RECREATION SECTION MONTHLY REPORT JUNE x1994 I. COLLIER COUNTY IV. IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARK AQUATIC FACILITY Activity 64 Activity 40 Facility Users 13,535 Facility Users 11, 648 Revenue 19,806.50 Revenue 3, 803 Instructional 41 Instructional 32 Special Events 268 Special Events 0 II. EAST NAPLES V. VETERANS COMMUNITY PARK COMMUNITY PARK Activity 130 Activity 334 Facility Users 19,500 Facility Users 19,230 Revenue 5,731 Revenue 13,242 Instructional 38 Instructional 121 Special Events 0 Special Events 0 III. FRANK MACKLE VI. GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PARK COMMUNITY PARK Activity 32 Activity 62 Facility Users 5,935 Facility Users 25,500 Revenue 6,506 Revenue 4, 390 Instructional 72 Instructional 71 Special Events 0 Special Events 0 VII. SECTION .HIGHLIGHTS 1. Summer Camp began June 20 at nine sites with 845 children registered. 11723 COLLIER COUNTY RACQUET CENTER MONTHLY REPORT Month JUNE Year 1994 I. Activity 96 IV. Instruction Hours 51 II. Facility Users 1458 V. Expenditures $ 48.00 652940 Resale $ Tennis 502 Chal Nite 12 652910 Operation Equip. $ Racqball 41 Leagues 472 652990 Operation Supply . $ Ch Cup 112 Wall 134 651110 Office Supply $ r Ladies Day 34 Men's Day 39 651910 Office Equip $ Clinics 96 Sp Event 646710 Off. Equip Repair $ Tourn Room Rent 16 647110 Printing $ 48.00 652210 Food $ 654210 Dues/Membershp $ III. Revenue $3651.50 VI. Section Highlights 5/27 to 6/27 TOTAL 1_ Racquetball Building repairs completed: new floors installed,wall: Tennis $ 182.50 $ sealed and repainted, foyer re- Racqball $ 104.00 $ carpeted. 424.00 2. Junior Tennis Summer Camps begun: Pro Shop $ $ two camps, ages 6-9 and ages 10-15. Instruction $ 987.00 $ 3. Continued consolidating Summer LeaguE 1525.00 program. Permit $ $ 4. Completed USTA National Competitive Leagues $ 429.00 $ League program: Men's 3.5 placed second in District, Women's 3.5 Team, Sp. Events $ $ and Women's 4.0 Team. Tourn $ $ Room Rent $ $ VII. Special Events I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 is u O 0 LO 0 rC o o 0 0 0 0 �, 0 0 r-� al 0 Q1 N C"l -1 .--I N N 0 N ,--f l0 N N n. V }4 Q N CV V • 4J 0 Ln a .0 H C rG a 4J W • a. Cn• 00 O O • O O O 00 0 O O O N 4:14 , OD CO 4Gj M N N N q w f O O O 0 0 • • in U1 In cn a1 lD N 0 n ''1 O ^+III 1...; O O 0• 0 O O O O 0 0 0 C G cc u) O • • ko N 0 1) 0 0 0 •zr h w d ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,° 0 0 0 0 00 O O Q 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 1r1 0 0 to 0• • C/7 .-1 al N N N 0. •1 to n') 01 O1 N in 0 N N .-1 ,--4 r1 N CO .0 N U 0 0 0 0 M Cr] O O O O V l0 ,-.4 kD Cr) vs R/ .-1 Cr) In • a 0 0 • C tn In• 0 • 0 0 ••0 0 0 O O O O 0• r d .-1 r-1 .I .-•1 01 c+1 Cr) fY) l0 d' N f� r-1 Cr) • i .i 47 v c4 N M et1 �p i� ap Q� C N M VO [� a0 Q� O sG 0 N N r1 r~ r~ r1 r.1 r-• N 's C C E" • m 0 8 0 0 g o o 8 8 0 0 R ' Vim' •O c'_) .--I ,—I (N CO .--I Q V' CO Cr) N C) • V N N CJ G J OD a4 ( ( TH. . 0 i ° o \ V G CC a a W M. ra .^ v r C a 0 ai bo 8 ° 8 8 0 0 8 e ti. a�i cri 8 °" / ' 8 e 8 a O 8 a v • _ e 8 8 8 --). • g. g Li dj al (ID N 0 .-1 r••• P rs- CL .4112 '''': 0 C O O �, 8 �, g 8 8 8•U C d' N CO O) v 1 rr C') N cn L L=. o L) c0 8 8 • g 8 8 8 N If) t11 1 r-1 u .1 e4 4. V a cA ' 8 g 0 g 0 0 G N t11 c� a tf) �p d. c'7 N QN N N N N N N N N VI e3 3 Npp 9 N Q .?S N`"I.I o (1. (I) a.. �I F- CR I F COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION PARK MAINTENANCE MONTHLY REPORT For the month of June 19 94 Park Maintenance Operations: Continue all daily maintenance functions at all parks and waterfront facilities. Dune restoration at Vanderbilt Beach Park complete. 800 sea oats were planted. Relandscaping of GGCP in progress. 67 slash pines to be planted along Santa Barbara Blvd. creating a landscape buffer. PARKS MAINTAINED # OF ACRES # OF SITES MTD YTD School Sites 10.5 5 10.5 5 10.5 5 Water Orientated* 438.5 12 438.5 12 438.5 12 Neighborhood Parks 38.7 12 38.7 12 38,7 12. Community Parks 242,3 9 242.3 9 242.3 9. Governmental Sites 0 0 0 0 0 0 Governmental site maintenance transferred to Facilities Management. C Special Projects: Description: Pelican Bay Community Park construction on schedule. Completion date mid—August. Renovation of Cocohatchee Rvier Park dock structure complete. Renovation of Tigertail Beach crossover system complete. Renovation of Bayview picnic shelters complete. Construction of dumpster enclosure and resoddinq of parking lot islands at ENCP completed. Park Supervision: Negotiated agreement for Caxambas concession with Cool Con- cession, Inc. submitted for Board approval. Report prepared and sent to the State relative to the Land Management Plan for Barefoot Beach County Park. Access issue asking to be amended to allow for control at front of Lely Beach Blvd. Vineyards Park construction behind schedule. Contractor asking for an extension due to delays. Agreement for Friends of Barefoot Beach sent back to Attorney's Office for second time with suggested changes. 4050 Gulfcoast Little League transferred from Neighborhood Park to Community Park COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARK RANGER PROGRAM MONTHLY REPORT June 1994 MONTH YEAR ADMINISTRATION: Routine Administration; Evaluations FIELD OPERATIONS: Routine patrol: open and close parks; enforcement of County . . ' ... - - - ... . • • . .as-. s-_....- .o. . •. _ •.• vendors dail - di- • - .• - ..• "- - - - • 11.. • o.. ... • .• - • •- •III • . .- IL .- tana ma of r•ph i r•1 Pq and Prpl i pm nt: pirk up trash: clean rPstrooms: empty trash• • - •- - •11111 • • -r • - • .- . • - - - . ' • •.. •111. .1 � .. • . !- .r . _ • • ' • •/... '••- •U. - - ... . ft - BEACH & WATER SITES CAR COUNT USERS* Beach Facilities Month YTD Month YTD Barefoot Beach Access 7,999 82,502 19,197 198,004 Barefoot Preserve 9,443 122,766 22,663 294,638 Clam Pass Park 10,346 100,887 24,830 242,128 Tigertail Beach 11,098 128,930 26,635 309,432 Vanderbilt Beach 10,086 84,012 24,206 201,628 Totals 48,972 519,097 117,531 1,245,830 Boat Launch Facilities: (Traffic counters installed 2/11/93) Bayview Park 6,388 66,555 15,331 159,732 SR 951 4,388 33,213 10,531 79,711 Caxambas - 6,215 68,552 14,916 164;524 Lake Traf ford 4,853 40,528 11,647 97,267 Cocohatchee River Park 6,287 76,540 15,088 183,696 (installed 6/25/93) Totals 28,131 285,388 67,513 684,930 *Users = car count x 2.6 - changed to 2.4 on 6/1/93 PARK SITES VISITED PERSONAL CONTACTS INTERPRETIVE PROJECTS Month Month YTS Month Y1E2 1,418 10,450 8,952 98,608 2 76 CON ENTS: 1 r•niirt- appparances by Rangers: assisted w/security for warner Brothers while at r'lam Paq_q- Pxntir• removal: 35 Australian Pines and 95 Br. Peppers; 24 citations i Q >ar1- 1s.gi gtpd with dung replanting - 1,000. Prionciq of ARP worked 30 volunteer hours and removed 150 B. Peooer Plants. 5933 BUDGET PROJECT AMOUNT COMMENTS A. Vanderbilt Beach Bath House 150,000 Completed. B. Aaron Lutz Park 110,000 Capital projects has given this project to a Project Engineer and design should be starting soon. Play structure ordered November 1993, $30,000. Delivered 2/3/94 and installed. C. Tony Rosbaugh Park 40,000 Completed. D. Tigertail Parking 261,000 Reconfiguration of existing parking lot - completion 12/31/93. Complete. E. Vanderbilt Beach Walkovers 100,000 Capital Projects will be permitting and designing these pedestrian walkways on N. Gulfshore Blvd. Permits obtained. Project on hold due to legal concerns. F. Children's Play Equipment 30,000 Playground equipment for Golden Gate Community Park - purchased November 1993. Delivered February 1994. Installed 3/4/94. G. Athletic Court Resurfacing 39,000 Resurfacing tennis and basketball courts throughout County - 3 to 5 year cycle. Specs developed, will be sent to Purchasing for Bid process mid February 1994. Put out for Bid 3/3/94. Bid opening 4/6/94. Bids awarded 4/26/94. Cost approximately 228,000. Resurfacing currently underway. . Vineyards Public Park 3,024,000 Bids were opened on December 15, 1993. The apparent low bidder is Vanderbilt Bay Construction at a cost of approx. 2.5 million. BCC has approved Bid, construction has begun, lake excavation completed. Work has begun on sports building, pavilions and community center. I. Pelican Bay Public Park 250,000 Westinghouse is building the ng ng park. The 5250,000 is County's contribution to the lighting and play structures, etc. Completion of park estimated Summer 1994. Racquet ball courts constructed, tennis court constructed started. 6/28/94 play • i equipment installation started, paving work to begin week of 6/28. J. Immokalee Recreation Center 2,700,000 The final plans are to be submitted to the County by 12/31/93. 12/29/93 final SDP submittal. Bid package submitted for Purchasing review 2/11/94. Out for Bid late February 1994. Pre-bid 3/10/94, Bid opening 3/30/94. Bids received apparent tow bidder D.E. Murphy. Will be preseted to BCC for approval. PARAB reviewed on 4/27/94. Recommendation to BCC 6/7/94. BCC rejected plans 6/7/94. Readdressed issue on 6/28/94. Approved plans for pool, slide, activity pool, and refurbishing locker rooms. Come back in 60 days in regard to gym. -1- BUDGET PROJECT AMOUNT COMMENTS K. Fresh Water Boat Launch in 300,000 Presented options to the BCC on 12/21/93. County Golden Gate Estates Attorney reviewing legal options. L. Golden Gate Community Center Expansion 1,500,000 On 12/14/93 BCC approved funding this project. Capital Projects is currently advertising for Request for Proposals for • professional services to design facility. Tom Donegan has been selected the Project Manager. RFP submitted 1/20/94. Due back 2/11/94 for Arch. Professional. Barney Schmidt and Weaver awarded contract and design work has begun. Bid spec presented to County for review. M. Golden Gate Estates Community Park 1,343,000 Agnoli, Barber S Brundage awarded contract. Meeting with School Board scheduled for 5/4/94 at Big Cypress. Public meeting held 5/11/94. Draft design reviewed by County. N. Purchase of Gulf Coast Little League 118,526 BCC approved purchase on 5/3/94 with improvements. Closing to be on 5/31/94. Complete. 0. South Naples Park 1,000,000 Department and Real Property are continuing to investigate potential property in the South Naples area for a community park site. Also looking at property in Naples Manor for a park. P. Light GGCP Football/soccer Field 60,000 Light existing football/soccer field at Golden Gate Community Park. OCPM has assigned a construction manager to this project. 0. Athletic Fields 1,674,000 Construction of athletic facilities throughout County. Presently looking at ENCP and Middle and Elementary school sites. i.e. Pine Ridge and East Naples Middle Schools. Met with principals to discuss proposed plan. R. Barefoot Beach Parking Lot 175,000 Additional 100 car parking lot in the State leased property. Tope developed. In stage of applying for State permit. Completion date 1/1/95. S. Bayview Perk Parking Lot ? Currently Real Property is discussing the possibility of leasing land from the Colliers to construct additional parking adjacent to Bayview. T. Lake Trafford 1 State wishes to make improvements to launch area. Deleted. U. Clam Pass Utilities & Boardwalk 495,000 Repairing boardwalk and running sewer service to bath house facilities. Capital Projects obtaining permits. Project to be completed by 10/1/94. V. Golden Gate Community Center Sewer Conn. 14,000 Connect Golden Gate Community Center to Florida Cities sewer system. All permits and authorization from Florida Cities Water obtained. Will be coordinated with expansion project. 1428 -2- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE BID #94-2209 VENDING MACHINES Objective: Recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that Bid #94-2209 for vending machines at public parks be awarded to Naples Vending. Considerations: Sealed bids for Bid #94-2209 Vending Machines were opened on June 22, 1994 . The posting date was April 29, 1994 . Invitations to bid were submitted to five (5) vendors, one bid was received. A bid tabulation is attached for your review. The bids were rated on percentage remitted to the County, product dispensers and price, maintenance and operational program, quality of equipment, and experience and professional reputation of proposers. Naples Vending showed a financial return of 25% to the County. The Company has had the contract for the past six years. Fiscal Impact: Revenue from vending machines for 93/94 is estimated to be $16, 000. Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners award Bid #94-2209 to Naples Vending for vending machines at public parks. Prepared by -'� -C Date 9y Murdo Smith, Parks and Recreation Operations Manager (_;;IC:;)Reviewed by —' Datea2„1 4- . Steve Brinkman, Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by Date Steve Carnell, Purchasing Director Reviewed by Date Thomas W. 011iff, Public Services Administrator 11668 • + + w + + -! , am ,ter + + . rn rn + + ,w r1 0i + + r1 + + + + rn + + N N + + N + + r♦ + + -•-1 (1) + -I- $•-1 g + + a + + 4 h + + + + + + w w + + _ A A + + + + z• Z+ + �: `H H + + \ w + + C o a + + C14 0 + + + + )U + + a) + + 0 U + + -.-i + + + + .W S1 + + a) + + co + + + + W a) + + — al Z + + a) -r4 + + g .0 + + J.7 0 + + -rl 1:1 + + E + .7• + + 2 + a1 + + s~ + a + -r1 + - + TS + W + .IP 4 + + a) + + > m + t. + + -J + I 0 + d + 01 4 + Z +CC t o a) + + N > + + ' N + + 1 Lfl .. + + R + + an + + E 0 + + m0 34 O `' E• W + + .4 CO CI) 0 LD E+ + + Z71'ti C Cr) b Z + W + N -r1 . a) O ci + . + rl U C) r4 -.>-1 [s. + Z + al 0 al 3 a) c!) + + >`1 E 0 U Z Z + a + w Q c a) 0 0 + 0 + 0---.. al x s� •--■ 1--1 + Ca + w Z U Es E. + Z + .M -rl Q =ict .- Es + > + >+ a) z f0 'O M 1--1 + + ,--• Z a) 'b -.-1 ES F1 + + Z > ri 'O O ■r z+ + Ea a + + EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE FRIENDS OF BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE, INC. FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATING AN EDUCATIONAL/LEARNING CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT BAREFOOT BEACH COUNTY PARK Objective: To have the board of County Commissioners approve a lease agreement with the Friends of Barefoot Beach Preserve, Inc. for the operation of an educational/learning center for the study of marine and coastal environment to be located at Barefoot Beach County Park. Considerations: The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department wishes to enter into an agreement with the Friends of Barefoot Beach Preserve, Inc. (an official non-profit departmental support group) for the operation of an educational/ learning center to be located at Barefoot Beach County Park. The Friends of Barefoot Beach Preserve, Inc. shall construct at its own cost the learning center at which time shall become property of Collier County. In consideration of such expense, the Friends of Barefoot Beach Preserve, Inc. will enter into an agreement with the Parks and Recreation Department for programming and the study of coastal environments. All such programs shall be open to the public and no private programs shall be offered without County consent. Said agreement shall be executed for an initial five year period with options to renew in perpetuity. Fiscal Impact: No financial impact to Collier County. Growth Management: None Recommendation: County staff and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommend that the Board of Commissioners approve said agreement. Prepared by Date Gary Franco, Parks Superintendent Reviewed by Date Steve Brinkman, Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by Date Thomas W. 011iff, Public Services Administrator 11859 r , ON THE PROGRESSION OF IMPACT FEES ` I property tax are: (1) it is regressive: (2) it is the only tax TABLE 3: Impact fees as a percent of family that tends to be paid in lump sum: and (3) it is the only income major tax beyond the ability of the taxpayer to control the amount paid.' The typical local property tax is so .average _ regressive that heavy reliance on it for revenue can make tamely Impact the entire taxation system of a particular state regressive income• fee Percent (Phares 1980. 132). Infrastructure financing through the property tax is regressive and unpopular. Apartment 12.209 1,045 7.3 Mobile'some 15.332 824 5.4 Single-faintly 6e-acned 25.913 1.712 6.4 Impact Fee Regressivity a. Al t- ,res a•e as of 15.45 aro are expressed in 1985 prices. Impact fees are based on costs, not ability to pay, and Source: S. Bureau of the C2nsta.American Housing Survey/or the united public facility costs are not a function of individual in- 7991.T ' `e enaGo"`t "`Ana`�e"encseud .urwerzreyo+Fbnea come.Thus, it follows that impact fees will not vary with personal income. Impact fees would therefore tend to be streets. the more water consumed, and the more parks regressive. needec Frequently impact fees are assessed in terms of The following road impact fee schedule for Sarasota expected traffic generation. water consumption.or other County, Florida, illustrates a typical assignment of impact physical unit. These units measure particular facets of a fees(see Table 2).This schedule shows that the fees vary change in population. Given that it is population growth by type of residential unit. This variation suggests some that calls for additional capital facilities, regardless of relief to regressivity in that the residential units with whether these people are residents, employees, or cus- lower impact fees tend-to have lower market values and tourers. it follows that fees for capital facilities should be thus may be presumed to be occupied by persons with linked to the number of people associated with a partic- lesser incomes and ability to pay. The regressive ten- ular development. The Sarasota County road impact fee dencv, however, is seen in Table 3. at least as far as the schedule illustrates a very common means of establishing comparison between single- and multifamily homes and this association. Certainly there are others. occupants. This result has always been thought to be Three alternate bases for residential impact fee as- unavoidable if an impact fee is to be used rather than sessment can be postulated: unit value, the number of some form of progressive taxation. bedrooms. or the square feet of living area. Table 4 sets out certain characteristics of residential units by the Alternative Methods for Deriving number of occupants. These data show that there is a Impact Fee Schedules positive correlation between the number of people and the scare feet of living area, the number of bedrooms. For most community facilities, impact is related to family income. and the value of the unit,' implying that population-the more people, the more traffic on the some or all of these measures could be used as a basis to assess impact fees. TABLE 2: Road impact fees, Sarasota County, Unit Value Base Florida e-e have been several attempts to reduce or elimi- nate the problem of the regressivity of impact fees. The Land use type' Fee City of Hollywood. Florida, imposed an impact fee for . tial recreational and open spaces at the rate of I acrcent of Single-family detached St,712 the value of the improvement being authorized by a Apartment 1,045 Mobile home 824 TABLE 4: Residential unit characteristics by Office(per 1.000 tt2) number of occupants Under 100.000 1t2 800 100.000-199.999 fT2 646 Family Unit Supermarket 5.672 Persors Ft2 Bedrooms income value General tight industry per 1.000 tt2 259 Retail(per 1,000112) 1 1.326 1.3 511,726 529.681 Under 50.000 tt2 5,327 2 1.607 2.4 21,98.4 48.357 50.000-99.999 tt2 3,706 3 1.658 2.8 27,071 52.836 100,000-199.999 11-2 3.015 4 1.812 3.0 31.786 69.040 200.000-199.999 tt2 1.779 5 1.8.47 3 2 30.864 73.368 500.000-1.000,000 tt2 1.681 6 1.829 3 3 27.764 71.109 Over 1,000.000 112 1.541 7- 1.737 3 5 26.047 60.607 _ a. Not an land use C1as$d,Caf Ons are,ntyuoed,n t rs td ■e Source -.S 3,r-22,a' re 32nsus 4.--er■can Mousing Survey fa the United Source:Ordinance 83-24. Sarasota County.Florida. Stares 11.85. a .t9. S:. P> IOURNAL 519 ACT__\t\ '??2 l ), JAMES C. NICHOLAS ' TABLE 5: Value-based impact fees as a percent proach to impact fee assessment is to associate impact of family income with the type of development.as shown in Table 2. How- ever. Burchell and Listokin's demographic multiplier Estimated Percent varies not only with :::-= type of residential development unit 1%impact of but also by the number of bedrooms. Broward County Family incorne value' fee income used this approach to establish the following park impact fees (see Table 6). Under S5.000 34.536 345.36 6.9 5.000-9.999 37.135 371.35 5.0 The regressivity of this approach is shown in Table 7. 10.000-14.999 42.335 423.35 3.4 The degree of regressivity of impact fees based on the 15.000-19.999 47.535 475.35 2.7 number of bedrooms is less than that based on the unit i 20.000-29,999 55,335 553.35 2.2 value. But, of practical significance,the Broward County 30,000-39,999 65,735 657.35 1.9 park impact fees were upheld as valid impact fees in • 40.000-59,999 81.335 813.35 1.6 Hollywood Inc. v. Broward County, 431 So.2d 606 (Fla. 60,000-79,999 102,135 1,021.35 1.5 4th DCA 1983). 80.000-99,999 122,935 1,229.35 1.4 A primary distinction between the fate of Hollywood's 100,000-119.999 143.735 1,437.35 1.3 fee and that of Broward County is that the court validated 120,000 and over' 169,736 1,697.36 1.3 Broward County's decision to measure the impact on the a 5135.000 used a, nu�xre. park system on the basis of the number of bedrooms by b. Unit value was assooated with tan*income with data from the American unit type. It appeared reasonable to conclude that park Housing Survey.Urvt value was estimated by the toeowing equation: costs vary with the number of people in a dwelling unit (56) and that the number of bedrooms within a unit is an valve+29,336+ 1.0.4 .Income acceptable way to establish a nexus between people and Fe- .9978 F-3126. parks and, thus, to determine costs. source_U.S.Bureau of the Census,American Housing Survey for the United A number of communities have based impact fees on ur states,1985,4.4. the number of bedrooms in a residential unit. Most, if not all, use the demographic multiplier technique. How- building permit. In Venditti-Sivaro, Inc. v. City of Hol- ever,communities need to distinguish between bedrooms lywood,39 Fla.Supp. 121 (1973),the court, labeling this and dens. studies, sewing rooms, and sitting rooms. Ad- charge an invalid tax, prohibited its collection. Addi- ditionally, the result is still regressive. tionally,the court found that this type of charge violated federal and state constitutional guarantees of equal pro- Unit Size Basis tection of the law.This means of imposing an impact fee Another approach is to assess impact fees on the basis was thought to be somewhat progressive, although un- of the square footage of a unit. This approach results in constitutional.Table 5 shows the results of a value-based proportionality and avoids the definitional problem as- approach to impact "fee" assessment. These results are, sociated with the number of bedrooms. clearly regressive for such an assessment. Therefore, Table 8 shows the association between the size of units value-based impact fee assessment would not aid•in re- and number of occupants, number of bedrooms, family ducing or eliminating regressivity. income, and unit value. To achieve the highest degree of progressiviry,income would be the preferred basis for Number of Bedrooms Base impact fees. But, as stated earlier, such a basis would Broward County, Florida, developed a system of park clearly be a tax and would require enabling legislation.` ` impact fees based upon the demographic multiplier tech- Palm Beach County, Florida, wished to develop a nique of Burchell and Listokin (1978). The typical ap- means of assessing impact fees that responded to actual TABLE 6: Park impact fees by number of bed- TABLE 7: Impact fees as a percent of family rooms, Broward County, Florida income Single family 2 bedrooms or under 5211 Mean 3 bedrooms 272 No.of farTaty Impact bedrooms income fee' Percent 4 bedrooms or more 319 Mobile home 0 S 9.360 S211 2.3 • 1 bedroom or under 146 1 12.720 211 1.7 2 bedrooms 192 3 bedrooms or more 276 2 17.251 211 1.2 3 27.373 272 1.0 Muftifamr7y 4- 36.599 319 0.9 1 bedroom or under 126 2 bedrooms or more 195 a. The src,.e-'a-'dv,-e:Fees were used for ttvs combatson. Source U S o.reau -'e Ge'sus.American Housing Survey for the United Source Broward County.Fonda.Code. Sec.5-192(e). S:a:es. ";4.5. =: APA JOURNAL 520 AL:LAIN =-- ON THE PROGRESSION OF IMPACT FEES impact a-d imposed the fewest possible social costs.The TABLE 9: Park net costs by residential unit size, jurisdic:::- accomplished these goals by basing its resi- Palm Beach County, Florida dential :-_act fees on square feet of living area within a reside-:e. The result is a proportional system of park Impact Family impact fces5 that offers substantial improvement over the unit re fee income' Percent regressive results of unit type or number of bedroom 800 or less 5313 513.673 2.1 approac==s (see Table 9). 801-1.399 407 19.324 2.1 Table :0 presents the Palm Beach County park costs 1 400-1,999 541 26.957 2.0 per unit on the basis of alternate means of assessment. 2. -2.599 676 33.975 2.0 The tab:e also shows family income for those units so 2,600 or over 884 40.039 2.2 that rela=ve progressivity may be calculated. The Palm Beach County park costs are used for this comparison so a. Family income a national and for 1985. These data are used to assure comparaoiir y among metnods. that their is no question about comparing one jurisdic So,,ce:U.S.Bureau of tr+e Census.American Housing Survey is the Untied tion's fees to another's. This table shows that the unit States 1985.92:Palm Beach County.Florida.admnistratiorti type ap-,-..roach is the most regressive and the unit size approac= is the least regressive with the number of bed- rooms being intermediate. living area impact fee is to develop the traditional de- The advantage of the unit size approach is demon- mographic multipliers on the basis of unit type and num- strated =v comparing the impact fees for a modest two- ber of bedrooms (Burchell and Listokin 1978), either by bedroom.... single-family home of 1,250 square feet (see a field survey or by analysis of the U.S. Census Public Table 1 1 i. For this home,fees based on living area would Use Sample. The cost of the former generally results in yield the least amount. Table 12 presents the same cal- use of the latter.' culatior.s. but for a 4,000 square-foot home. The shift Palm Beach County, Florida, analyzed and cross- from the smaller to the larger home reverses the order tabulated the 1980 Public Use Sample data by unit type of most:o least amount of the fee. For the smaller home, and size.Table 13 shows the results, together with 1989 a the unit size approach imposed the least burden, mea- estimates for these data. Because of the nine-year lapse, sured ir. terms of percent of family income. For larger the data have been adjusted to 1989 by simple ratios. homes, unit size imposed the greatest burden, again These ratios were calculated by contrasting the average measure.:by percent of family income.These data show, occupancy of dwelling units for 1989 with 1980. Table however.that the amounts of fees determined by the unit 13 shows that size, in terms of bedrooms, is the major size approach are still not progressive but, at least, the determinant of the number of occupants. 3 degree of regressivity noted for some of the other ap- Table 14 expresses the data in a slightly differenrway proaches has been eliminated. The unit size approach to j impact assessment has not yet been tested in the courts, but it car. be expected. TABLE 10: Palm Beach County park impact fee by alternative methods of assessment Demographic Impact of Residential Persons Park Family Units by Size of Unit Approaches per unit "fee- income Percent The remainder of this article sets out a simplified Simple residential unit method for establishing demographic impact on the basis All units 2.357 546.22 23,618 2.3 of dwe::ing unit size. The first step in implementing a Unit type Multi-family 1.934 424.67 15.042-- 2.8 TABLE 8: Characteristics by size of unit Mobile home 2.097 • 471.49 15.332 3.1 Single-family attached 2.089 469.27 21.928 2.1 Mean Mean Single-family detached 2.753 660.30 26,913 2.5 family housing Number of bedrooms Unit ft2 Persons Bedrooms income value Single-family units 1 or less 1.683 352.46 9,360 3.8 Under 503 1.7 1.4 S 9.666 516.224 2 2.051 458.34 12.720 3.6 -95,9 2.2 2.2 14.332 25.320 3 3.015 735.68 17,251 4.3 1.000-1.199 2.5 2.8 22.052 50.368 4 or more 3.838 972.45 26.979 3.6 1.500-1.?99 2.6 3.0 29.385 67,985 2.000-2.=?9 2.9 3.2 32.878 76.872 Ft2 of living area 2.500 an.:.over 3.0 3.4 36.479 91.211 800 or less 1.646 341.32 13.775 2.5 Percent.range 801-1.399 2.007 445.49 17,453 2.6 500°, 76.5 142.9 277.4 462.2 1.400-1.999 2.525 587.49 26,957 2.2 2.000-2.599 3.045 740.51 33.975 2.2 Scx.xce U 5 Bureau of the Census.American Housing Survey for the Untied 2.600 or more 3 845 975.85 37.323 2.6 S_^s. 1985. 44.92 APB IOLRNAL 521 .AV-rUN1"' 1992 JAMES C. NICHOLAS TABLE 1 1: Alternative fee calculations for a two- TABLE 14: Occupancy by number of bedrooms, bedroom 1,250 square-foot single-family home Palm Beach County, 1989 Family Number of bedroo s Basis Fee income Percent 1 or less 2 3 4 Or more All residential units 546.22 21,311 2.6 - Unit type 660.30 21,311 3.1 Single-family detached nsd' 2.05 3.02 3.84 No.of bedrooms 458.34 21,311 2.2 Single-family attached 1.56 2.01 3.02 4.86 Living area 445.49 21,311 2.1 Multifamily 1.58 1.99 3.22 nsd' Mobile horse 1.61 1.92 3.27 nsd' Atl 1.65 2.01 3.05 3.85 TABLE 12:Alternative fee calculations for a two- Mean 1.58 1.99 3.13 4.35 bedroom 4,000 square-foot single-family home Not sufficient data Source:U.S.Bureau of the Census.Public Use Sample. Family Basis Fee income Percent available from the Public Use Sample.Rather.occupants • All residential units 546.22 51,901 1.1 • by unit type and size were summed and then this sum unit type 660.30 51,901 1.3 was divided by the number of units to obtain averages. Lvi bedrooms 975.8 51,901 0.9 Table 14 shows the mean of the averages. It is generally iving g area 975.85 5 51,901 1 1.9 not proper to take an average of averages. In this case, however,the mean of the averages establishes a reference to compare the impact of unit size on occupancy. There point that demonstrates that the "all" appears to be a is very little variation in average occupancy by unit type, reasonable representation of the individual unit types. . while there is a great deal of variation in average oc- For the four bedroom or more, the "all" reflects the oc- cupancy by size of unit-The preferred statistical technique cupancy of single-family detached units rather than at- would be to test for significant differences among means cached units, because the vast majority(99.3 percent) of of occupancy by number of bedrooms by type of unit. If four bedroom or larger units are detached units and this there were no significant differences, it would seem that should be reflected in the averages. I unit type has no role in explaining occupancy.This test, A sample of 303 residential building permits for Palm however, is not possible because information on the dis- Beach County issued in 1989 yielded data on unit type, . tribution of occupants by type and size of unit is not the size in square feet of living area, and the number of bedrooms (see Table 1 5). The table also shows the av- erages for the unit types.The results of the building permit TABLE 13: Dwelling unit occupancy by type and survey were subjected to linear regression analysis to size of unit, Palm Beach County, 1989 arrive at a continuum of square footages to be used to Type and size of unit Average occupancy TABLE 15:Square footage and bedrooms by type Single-family detached of dwelling unit, Palm Beach County, 1989 r 2 bedrooms or tens 2.051 3 bedrooms 3.015 Average 3.838 number _ 4 or more bedrooms `� Bedrooms single-family Type of residential unit of ft= Attached sing Y 1 bedroom 1.559 . 2 bedrooms 2.005 Multifamily 3 bedrooms 3.017 Total average 1,457.0 2.0 4 or more bedrooms 4.855 1 or less 614.30 Multifamily 2 1,453.8 1 bedroom 1.579 3 or more 1,890.5 2 bedrooms 1.988 Attached single-`amply 3 bedrooms 3.221 Total average 1.796.0 3.0 Mobile home 2 or less 1,552.6 1 bedroom 1.607 3 or more 2,040.1 2 bedrooms 1.920 Detached single-family 3 bedrooms 3.272 Total average 2.904.0 3.1 AU housing types 2 or less 1,767.9 1 bedroom 1.546 3 2,738.6 A tor 2 bedrooms 2.007 4 or more 4,205.6 3 bedrooms 3.045 4 or more bedrooms 3.845 Source: Pair') 5_a+, Car+'• ";bnoa, Cepanment of P+amcg. Bukfw`G. and Zoning .aPA )OLR<.AL 522 . LTl.■1\ '=._ I I ON THE PROGRESSION OF IMPACT FEES TABLE 16: Results of regression analysis. Palm TABLE 18: Number of bedrooms in terms of Beach County, Florida, 1989 square feet of living area, Palm Beach County, Florida, 1989 Multifami.'y (5.8) (Dora No. bedrooms Square ge Ft' = 156.47 + 588.8•Bedrooms r2 = .2460 F =33.6 Lower Upper Lower Upper Single-family attached (4.35) 0 800 Fe = 376.71 + 567.85•Bedrooms 0.00 1.25 1.26 2.50 801 1.399 r' _ .1813 F = 18.9 1. 1.400 1,999 2.51 2.95 Single-family detached (8.6) 2.96 3.95 2.000 2,599 Ft' = -723 + 1,189•Bedrooms 3.96 2,600 r2 .3806 F= 74.1 All dweffe+g units (14.5) Flt = -671 + 1,065.Bedrooms was used to define unit sizes for purposes of impact fees. r= - .4096 F= 210 Table 18 sets out the defined sizes of units.This definition is reached by expressing a lower and upper limit of the number of bedrooms that may be found within a unit of that number of bedrooms. This is done to establish a define size of unit. Table 16 summarizes the regression continuum of square footages. Thus, one bedroom or analyses• fewer units are defined as 1.25 bedrooms or less. Like- All of the results are statistically significant However, wise,two bedroom units are defined as 1.26 to 2.95 bed- appreciably better statistical results were obtained for rooms. The resulting continuum of square footages is the all unit category than for the individual unit care- joined with the unit occupancies shown in Table 14 to gories. This result would tend to support the position become the basis for determining residential impact fees that unit size, rather than type, explains occupancy. (see Table 19). Table 17 defines the number of bedrooms in terms of square feet by unit type.Each of the estimating equations Toward Progression shown in Table 16 would give a different result. How- ever, the analysis concluded that size offered the better The frequency of litigation, together with unclear en- explanation for occupancy and thus the all units equation ablement, have led communities to stick with tried and true methods of assessing impact fees.Yet,the regressive nature of unit-based approaches is apparent. Some ju- TABLE 17: Bedrooms by unit type in square feet, risdictions have reduced the most regressive aspects of Palm Beach County, Florida, 1989 impact fees by introducing the number of bedrooms within a residential unit as a determinant of the amount Estimated of the fee. Unit type sae This article pointed out that bedroom-based residential Single-family detached impact fees are still somewhat regressive. Basing the as- 1.00 cc less 466 sessment on unit size, however, is both more accurate 2.00 1,655 in terms of measuring impact and certainly less regressive. 3.00 2.844 In fact., unit size-based fees appear to be somewhat pro- 4.00 or more 4,033 portional.This method reduces, but does not-eliminate. the negative economic effects of impact fees.The method Single-family.00 o ess attached 945 could be a step forward-a progression-toward more 1.00 or less 2.00 '1 512 equitable fees. It may also spur a new round of impact 3.00 2,080 fee litigation. 4.00 or more 2.648 Muttifam+ly TABLE 19: Occupancy by square feet of living 1.00«less 745 area, Palm Beach County, Florida, 1989 2.00 1,334 3.00 1,923 Average occupancy 4.00or more 2.512 Size of unit cy All units 800 or less 1.646 100«less 394 801-1.399 2.007 2.00 1,459 1,400-1.999 2.526 3.00 2.524 2.000-2.599 1045 4.00 or more 3.589 2.600 or over 3.645 APA IC_RNAL 523 ALTU\t\ :'?2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Parks and Recreational Facilities Standard of Service 1 Facilities per 1, 000 Persons Standards 2 Summary of Existing & Buildout Dwelling Units and Population 3 Basic Strategic Planning Areas 4 Growth Management Plan Suggested changes 5 Potential Philosophical changes 6 Typical Community Park 7 Proposed Standards 8 Regional Facilities 9 Population Guidelines for Outdoor Recreation Facilities Table 6. 3 10 Population Guidelines for User-Oriented Recreation Activities 11 Site Guidelines for Community Outdoor Recreation Resources and Facilities 12 Suggested Facility Development Standards 14 PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES POPULATION TO BE SERVED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998: 1. Service Recipients: X All County Residents Other: 2 . Service Area: X County-wide Other: 3 . Service Period: X Permanent Population = 241, 050 Peak Period Population = 327 , 949 Weighted Average of Permanent and Peak = 269 ,727 STANDARD OF SERVICE: 1. 2882 acres of community park land/1000 population : 2 .9412 acres of regional park land/1000 population : $122 . 00 168 . 00 of recreation facilities inventory value per capita at current value Source of Standard: CCPC Citizen's Advisory Committee Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Staff (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) REQUIRED FOR STANDARD 9/30/98 PER 1000 POP. VALUE TOTAL TYPE OF FACILITY PERSONS 241, 050 PER UNIT VALUE Amphitheater 0 . 0118 3 100, 000 300, 000 Baseball Fields 0. 0353 8 550, 000 4 , 400, 000 Basketball/Volleyball 0. 1765 40 25, 000 1, 000, 000 Bicycle Trails: Miles 0. 0553 13 28,900 375,700 Children's' Playgrounds 0. 1059 24 50, 000 1,200, 000 Community Centers 0. 0353 8 1, 000, 000 8, 000, 000 Community Pool 0. 0059 1 1, 500, 000 1, 500, 000 Fitness Station Trails 0. 0353 8 76, 000 608, 000 Football/Soccer Fields 0. 0353 8 350, 000 2 , 800, 000 Recreation Center 0. 0059 2 2 , 000, 000 4 , 000, 000 Jogging Trails: Miles 0. 0353 8 50, 000 400, 000 Competition Pool 0. 0059 1 1, 500, 000 1, 500, 000 Picnic Pavilions 0. 0706 16 50, 000 - 800, 000 Racquetball Courts 0. 1412 32 25, 000 800, 000 Shuffleboard Courts 0. 0706 16 25 , 000 400 , 000 Softball Fields 0 . 0706 16 350, 000 5, 600, 000 Tennis Courts 0 . 0706 32 25 , 000 800 , 000 Track and Field 0 . 0059 0 0 0 Boat Ramps 0 . 1059 24 250 , 000 6 , 000, 000 TOTAL 40, 483, 700 Value per capita (Value/241, 050 population) $ 168 . 00 -1- Doc. Ref: 5214 FACILITIES PER 1, 000 PERSONS STANDARDS COUNTY FRPA* OTHER TYPE OF FACILITY STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD Amphitheater 0. 0118 0 . 04 Baseball Fields 0. 0353 0. 17 0. 17 (2) 0. 02 (4) Basketball/Volleyball Courts 0. 1765 0. 02 0. 04 (2) 0. 02 (4) Bicycle Trails: Miles 0. 0553 1. 00 Children's' Playgrounds 0. 1059 1. 00 (5) Community Centers 0. 0353 0. 067 (6) Community Park: acres 1. 2882 2 . 00 2 . 00 (2) Community Pool 0. 0059 Fitness Station Trails 0 . 0353 0. 10 0. 13 (5) Football Fields 0. 0353 0. 25 0. 25 (2) 0. 05 (4) Recreation Center 0. 0059 Jogging Trails: Miles 0. 0353 0.50 Competition Pool 0. 0059 0. 04 0. 04 (2) 0. 05 (4) Picnic Pavilions 0. 0706 0.05 (5) Racquetball Courts 0. 1412 0. 10 0. 01 (2) 0. 05 (4) Regional Park: acres 2 .9412 20. 00 20. 00 (2) 5. 00 (3) Shuffleboard Courts 0. 0706 0. 20 0. 02 (2) 0. 05 (5) Soccer Fields 0. 0353 0. 25 0.25 (2) 0. 01 (4) Softball Fields 0. 0706 0. 30 0. 17 (2) 0. 02 (4) Tennis Courts 0. 0706 0.50 0. 05 (2) 0.25 (3) 0. 02 (7) Track and Field 0. 0059 0. 05 (4) Boat Ramps - Freshwater 0. 0529 25. 00** 3 . 03 (8) Boat Ramps - Saltwater 0. 1118 25. 00** 3 . 03 (8) Boat Ramps - Combined 0 . 1059 3 . 03 (8) * FRPA = Florida Recreation and Parks Association - ** Standards are per 1, 000 registered boats (2) Collier County Comprehensive Plan quoting Outdoor Recreation in Florida, 1981 as a guideline. (3) Lee County CIP: 1986-97 - 1990-91 (based on County Comprehensive Plan (4) National Recreation and Parks Association (5) Kansas City, Missouri (6) Jackson, Tennessee (7) Seminole County: "Recommended Facility Types and Standards , " October 17 , 1986 (8) Florida Department of Natural Resources: 1 lane/300 boats -2- Doc. Ref: 5214 4. Table 1 Summary of Existing and Buildout Dwelling Units and Population By Planning Community 213 -- ac Estimated Estimated Planning 1992 1992 Buildout Buildout Community Dwelling Units Population* Dwelling Units Population Urban Area 99,668 168,514 275,607 458,001 North Naples 21,578 29,413 57,123 95,017 Urban Estates 2,566 6,044 46,770 100,100 Central Naples 8,668 13,750 19,695 32,531 Golden Gate 12,450 22,514 24,460 42,191 Naples 17,516 19,868 27,252 40,971 South Naples 9,047 14,061 38,342 71,003 East Naples 11,995 19,862 20,590 38,568 Marco 13,804 11,730 25,127 25,877 'Population estimates prepared by the Collier County Long Range Planning Department Figures 2,3 and 4 illustrate the comparison of existing and projected dwelling units and population by planning communities. Determining Commercial Acreage and Employment Projections The next step in developing projected socioeconomic data for the transportation analysis is the forecasting of commercial and employment data. Appendix B contains the database prepared in determining buildout employment totals. FDOT consultants created a 1990 employment database containing information obtained from the State Department of Labor and Employment Security. This information was listed by TAZ and contained the number of employees for each TAZ by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code. The SIC codes for each employment category is listed as follows: Industrial SIC codes 1-39 Commercial SIC codes 50-59 Service SIC codes 40-49, 60-99 Buildout Study 3/16/94 -3- ae 4 •c C l.+ -0 .N 1+ a) C N al at w al C - at C al a) O. 0 --1 p, a1 ••+ ca w m 4-4 a.) m , 4 al 1. G G • 1 aa)) o O. 0 b OO U al 1. E o a al ,-+ U U m 0 N Co w U a • U 0 ) a) 0 U al CT C a) a) C -1 W 1. +-1 N a) U U U -.1 c0 CA a) l..i 00 a) C a) a) U a) C a) G N 4: .0 E F b E 7 U U •.-1 -1 CO al a) C C) • >1 a o a = -.r • C •b U O -o C C o a m m O a) .0 O ' N 1-4 a) b -1 O 0 a) C -1 O a) C --1 00 r1 O 41 U al .-4 ••+ p U -1 U --1 X) ••• a) C a) a) U 1L U •■• a) C U •.4 o .lG > N U > 1+ C 1.+ b U > b •••+ C b > 14 14 a) l.+ ••4 d C A N a) O b N a) C 0 O '0 a) O N C] O N Ca 0. 041 dw C] at E 0 Nbw a ai • U U U .,a b u 0 � N CO 0 G 1+ b 41 G CO -+ b 0 a1 C al C N O C aa �-N-i � 114 '0 u En C C -+ a) 0. 4 co a, O G + C CO o E r4 C7 N N O 0 U N C' O, a) a U a) a) U N w .0 U +-1 ••4 C a) C U • •-1 11 90 U 0 O a ai 00 C N m b -a a) C •••1 O a) C 00 a N - 1. +-1 U .-1 +-1 ..-4 ..s4 •-1 N 1-1 3.1 b U U C b > 1.1 1�.1 c• aw 'd m a) O •G CI o ai d4-+ c, 0 m •bw a Un N 1.4 aN a a) U U N • ..Nd U 1.t ci a aL • a .li C ai b b C a1. a) a) O O 0 -+ r4 U w ..4 C C a 1 b a, C a) C N at 4-4 a o. O Cs. O a) co co C C co C ai a) E al .- N Z of U C.) .0 >, a w -.4 U N -1 N b 0 Z 1-+ a) 1-1 Z U -1 1. C 11 "0 U N a U al 0 aL 1-1 0 -+1 -- CO ,-1 C C -1 a) a) • a ,-1 Z Cr' W o U C ai 1+ E N a O .-1 U C --1 w U 0 44 C a C C O E -4 -+ C) 0 N o 3 o U al a o .1.1 C 0) 0 U 10 f a. •04 N ai 14 U -1 CO ,C W ai of N to >, O 0 U ai C O ca 44 ..d 1. U U 00 o 0 -4 -•1 w a) C U • .-4 >, a) a ).1 a-1 b CO '0 U a C 0 a CO 00 ai 0 U U U CC O C 0 • N a, '0 +-1 0 U C --1 o a) C 14 C •■/' a) 41 G] ■ + C 1i 4-1 .0 d ,-4 -4 a -4 U .d XI •d 0 0 -4 > .-t E-I m 4-4 U -+ at: 00 U +d a) . ,-4 -1 -1 a. d > •0 W )-4 14 'C U > •C C 'S> > 1•+ is C1. 00 U 'b E w' ai O C U C O •O al c0 C O 10 4) 0 0 X 41 N C O Ea O O c0 co G. 4-1 < W C ,l] 0 N b cN a. w cd w co U ca co • H 0 C N •••1 .d r i U 14 1. '0 CO ai C 01 0 0• U O.0 C 4 0 C C C) +4 CO r1 •.4 14 10 U N ,o c m aal 'a a` ..0 14 s. , , u . mw C CO a --1 •.1 U Cu 00 a U v .4 UI 3 10.1 ,-1 0 CO3 T, 0 C U 4) m a, w .G 4.1 000 -4 -+ C d C U • 0•-. •0 0 b U 0 0 0. 0 00 O C C a) b +-1 0 C •-1 O CO C •+ C 4.) c0 -4 14 •-1 U -r .n .d > gA C y � E b -1 b U C b > . 1.1 r C OO 0 N a) O b O O m E . w v maw a -4 a) ai 4.) E C) >0 a) • al 4.4 0 0 0) U C w CO CO E -1 CO r-1 CO b U a) 0 a) .-4 Z r•4 m b U C -. I a 04 1 ..0 0 3 CC N O W 7 a, 41 1+ >• Q' 13 CO .4 L N m ,2J cn 3 c U 1.. as U 0 a >4 U Sr m 0 C C 0 U 14 C o 00 N E GT. 0 N C ra a) 1. 04 -1 U C m 00 CJ C .14 ai O 3 0 c 1) •.. 0 C a) a-4 ..-4 1. cd -1 14 ai -X O a) O 0 0 1 01 L al U ai U C 3 I 1+ ,) U 14 N 0 CO 1. U -r U U 0 14 a b -d +4 ai CO an 0 c0 .23 0 N a. C >• O a X >, 0 9 ai U Z ..4 O U w 4) m m m U cA U 0 1r 1. N -. +-1 N 0 Z -I O 0 1. w -. U 03 c a1 C U N C b C 0 0. 040 < a U C O a) .0 o .0 • C C C > co U a. 9 •O 1U. a 3 u a. a 114 C • N X O C O O O co X O N 0 0 U N Cs) Cr) U .0 CL U cn a. W U Z • s -4- GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUGGESTED CHANGES * Add Marco back to Community Park Impact Fee. * Eliminate all the individual community park facilities and list as community parks. * Modify community park facilities to include new facilities and/or costs. * Consider including the cost of acquiring additional land at existing community parks and the cost to further develop those parks to bring them as close as possible to the new standards. * Modify community park impact fees so they could be used for acquiring and developing selected neighborhood parks as approved by the Park Board and BCC. Establish a standard and cost. * Designate all middle schools as community park sites and try to acquire land adjacent to the schools to be used for future community parks. * Establish facility standards for beach parks and beach parking and cost associated with those facilities. These should be included in the regional park impact fees. * Review and establish new facility standards and costs for boat ramps and include in regional park impact fees. * Review and establish new facility standards and costs for linear parks/trails. * Review and establish new facility standards and costs for aquatic facility. * Review and establish new facility standards and costs for recreation centers. * Review and establish new facility standards and costs for senior centers. * Review and establish new standards and costs for regional and district parks which might include facilities such as athletic fields, outdoor events facility or other speciality areas that might be of county-wide interest. Acquisition and development of the first site or sites should be an immediate priority. * Consider locating public library adjacent to Community Center at future community parks. * Modify definitions of community park and regional park to allow for proposed modifications. * Build regional district parks and rec center/pool for 50, 000 rather than a community center which will allow us to build facilities that will be more revenue producing. * Develop both Parks and Recreation Standards and Growth Management Standards. -5- POTENTIAL PHILOSOPHICAL CHANGES 1. Generalize community park definition to include both neighborhood and community parks. Add cost of improvement to existing parks. 2 . Generalize regional park definition to include both district and regional parks. Add cost of beach parks and parking, linear parks and trails, athletic facilities, recreation complexes, senior centers and unique natural areas to the standard. 3 . Build future parks in conjunction with middle schools, high schools and libraries to get the most efficient use of taxpayers dollars. Libraries can be located adjacent to recreation centers, and building adjacent to middle school sites will allow us to take advantage of school fields, courts, parking and indoor facilities, and allow us to purchase a park site that would be somewhat smaller than standard. 4 . In order to avoid the need for 18 to 19 community parks and centers at buildout (458, 000 pop. ) let's try to switch our future park development from community parks serving a population of 25, 000 to district parks serving 50, 000 people. This will allow us to purchase fewer but larger park sites which are much less costly to maintain. Recreation facilities which are developed in district parks can therefore be larger, more comprehensive, and more revenue generating than can smaller facilities because the market area will have doubled and more facilities can be built. Eight or ten tennis courts are much more profitable than four, if the market is there, and much easier to maintain at one location. Likewise, a large recreation complex with a gym, fitness facility, racquetball courts, theatre, locker rooms, gameroom, concessions/kitchen, and outdoor pool complex could generate a substantial amount of revenue from admissions, class fees and rentals. A large complex of athletic fields is much cheaper to maintain at one location than many, and gives the Department and the athletic associations much more revenue from concessions and tournaments. 5. District parks should serve approximately 50, 000 people and be 50 to 200 acres in size. Each park should be designed based on the natural factors on the site and the recreational needs of the community. The cost to maintain a 40 acre community park is $200, 000 to $250, 000 annually, or approximately $5, 000 per acre. The cost to maintain a 100 acre district park would be $300, 000 to $350, 000 annually, or approximately $3 , 000 per acre. 6. The cost of a 25, 000 sq. ft. recreation center would be 2 . 5 million and cost $400, 000 per year to operate, less revenues of $250, 000 or 60% recovery of expenses. Our existing 10, 000 sq. ft. community centers cost 1. 0 million to construct and $250, 000 per year to operate, less revenues of approximately $75, 000 or 30% recovery of revenue. Revenue generation is restricted at these existing community centers because there are only two small class rooms and one medium sized multipurpose room that are used for classes and rentals. 7. If we change our focus about building community parks, we may want to rethink what we do with the 1. 0 million available for the South Naples Community Park and whether we still want to build a community center in Phase II of the Estates Community Park. TYPICAL COMMUNITY PARK 1 Community Center $1, 000, 000 1 Baseball Field 550, 000 3 Softball/Baseball ($350, 000) 1, 050, 000 2 Basketball ($25, 000) 50, 000 8 Racquetball ($25, 000) 200, 000 8 Tennis ($25, 000) 200, 000 1 Jogging Trails 100, 000 1 Playground 100, 000 1 Picnic Pavilion 150, 000 5 Picnic Shelter ($20, 000) 100, 000 1 Athletic Center 200, 000 4 Sand Volleyball 50,000 4 Shuffleboard Courts 50, 000 2 Soccer/Football Fields ($350, 000) 700, 000 1 Lake 300, 000 1 Park Maintenance Building/yard 100, 000 1 Speciality Use Area 100, 000 Total $5, 000, 000 Typical Community Park Acreage 50 to 60 acres $1,500,000 95,76 -7- EXISTING STANDARD PROPOSED STANDARD Amphitheatre 1/86,500 Drop Baseball 1/28, 382 1/25, 000 Basketball 1/5, 658 1/12 , 500 Bicycle Trails 1/18, 165 Regional Playgrounds 1/9,460 1/25, 000 Community Centers 1/28, 382 1/25, 000 Community Pool 1/165, 136 Regional Fitness Trail 1/28, 382 Drop Football/Soccer 1/28, 382 1/12 , 500 Recreation Center 1/165, 136 Regional Jogging Trail (mile) 1/28,382 1/25, 000 Competitive Pool 1/165,136 Regional Picnic Pavilions 1/14, 191 1/25, 000 Racquetball 1/7, 095 1/3 , 125 Shuffleboard 1/14, 191 1/6, 250 Softball/Baseball 1/14, 191 1/8, 333 Tennis Courts 1/14, 191 1/3 , 125 Boat Ramps 1/6, 075 Regional Track & Field 1/165, 136 Drop 11548 6/14/94 I -8- REGIONAL FACILITIES Linear Park/Trails: Miles $ 28, 900 1/18 , 165 Community Pool 1, 500, 000 1/165, 136 Recreation Center 2, 000, 000 1/165, 136 Competitive Pool 1,500, 000 1/165, 136 Boat Ramps/Marina 250, 000 1/6, 075 Beach Parks/Parking 4 parks 900 parking Regional Park - 100+ acres 2 - 3 million Athletic Complex 6.5 - 7 million Outdoor Events Facility 1 - 2 million 11547 6/21/94 -9- iii a O �O O !� O O a A r a ON N N N 0 .0 'to in ,co wO Z r- • T Oo 8 ' • a O a O O a O O O N t N N N 0 0 O O O • M 2 4, N CC =': O O 0 0 0 ppO o °0 0 0 0 cp O O N �O O O O O i!l to C N O N Z IV W N » f0 g u•_ L N • W U oWi >6 L w « 2 2.... _ M W Ib!• UJ L « O wC WV ILI L r- at Cu w » ESL,, iJ ■ E � u CI O » O ` L O U a » 4 ?U. O L L x• • • � o2 pp • «q .... C E l E u E� E « 70 • s GC Z so a O ca < d J �i J J -.I j� O 8 L n a# L L ___• Y L L « V L 4. ^ • Y » • « •w a w w .0 0 1 u w L L E 1.11 L g « C QL L > L Z Q N v V C u L g V O • O C N L• - V+ p C V U V« .0 •- .0 « • E 12 C 0 >, Y 7 0 w U 0 L »S 3 L U L U X « W U L w 111 w ' v. . _ O 1L W W U d S CO S • • ■ I W -10- I 1 a a a U O 0 O O o 0 O 0 o O O O 0 c a O a O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 K' in TY O N N O O N In H O N O M M., N N N Z L V p S pp N O N O O O O O O O O O O O O Y K O to O Cr In 0 0 0 N Al 0 to O se V ++ O N iO a el- N 0 0 0 (J r' 0 r- 0 w O = IIII V 7 L Cad 4 0 O O H E O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 4. O O a C O O O O O O O in O N O O O O O O O O O O O N CA O v 0 _ CO in .- N ,T N .- .- �t O M F.- N O SI 2 V W N « ce La 0 •• LL Q ,- -13 .-U K i Ny V co vf .. 4..... r L 4.4~ 6,4 f.7 C1 C '0 41 L � 14 L 464 al Lai g J >4 14 « M 4- 4) 7 ~- om u u g" O t U o u w (.(..) o < N •� u ~ W 1- •r w 1+ w 0 U U O 15 0 L 4 C/ Cl C ' -< C --. L 0 O • L N 0 Y III W 07 O 7 M M .. r a 0 �_ Lt - a a J d' O Oi C J - y ..... a a L 0 W U \ O) U _ _ 9 C J I t. q d C7 2 7a OL CI u a ., 0 ar 7O O .L C! 0 4( w - L 7 J u CO L W - �0 O • • S L 0- rC P J 7 ) 4) P 1- CO W S CO N co) > W W S S 1 all — OQ -J 1• M I Ll i MIL 0 u-c .. T - CO.■ N O L 4771 J +. d �+ ar•+ U G' 0 L CO CO x go a o CO L al v CO N 2 a O J g'z a g smolli >. c ca - U .. m 2 2 2 `1 - 01 c 0 V E w J 01 CO L CO .1- • t+ 12 Y t w CO 0 C c 1.+- 0 t 10 O •07 O Z .0 0 L v C CCl 0i I U 0 4- tD 4. S m N N > 0. 4-7 • • N 1 ;. , allimil . _ _11- - .;'i i i • N*O J Cp W G Cy J Y. .-. LL. ppp< tu W M N W W K CC J g G r 8W O C 10 C-1 ►- W N C V« C O L C >> L L L a u L «O a O _ •C «S « a L ••r 0 ✓ E Y p- . , Y 6 01 V O V e L p q p ~ u C « C ✓ U 1C C L . C J . U t � j a 5 _ C Y r L C O a C o ' C Y >g ~ .•Ou .• o O. O C `F CS g . C �4 S C o ° L o C o € C u u C C .« 9 « o .+ C 4g C u « Ewa . L u a U C 0.0 . . > o o O C DJ . >.C S d A L 21- Y 8 L S p >.«D u Q a ,q Q 3 n a.O w G.a L L o .. M d L L U « . O L L U Y N d _ O =w O O L _ EO L C S O O t �f N < Z• C 41 a . O L` N^ \ E. .Y C C < . • Y ✓a V O > 7 0 U� L .0\N > 7 N M Y N 6- 41 N L N . . 0. U _ O C_w O «q N L =C U.N Q. 7 0 « • VN •• - — 0 E ..^ _ • U . L L « d .... .c ..... la .C ✓ + {I v. L C .+ -J... �p C LI E O C O CU 0 «q P C N ILI =«L C N aa O M J O O O « . J.• in N - 0 E .+^ L O O d 4)L .L ✓. 4 0 CC L CC • 0. E O o C\� DC • E«L 7 O C V C-. O O C E O O L « COO 0 _ N Z C L. U N O « Ol Q t L I v C O U O • 7 > \ Y O M L E 11 C LL L N ✓,r i t o S u Q . L O C L _ « o g a� C O• • 2 9Y LL nas • L O).0 M C C= o . O L T C a.- o .4`• �• °— O L 4. .a.- a e C J O L L C U C M Y. Z L. ..■ a i a 2 2. 2 go 311 10 Z M -l2- N Ir I ■ e E . Y L 4J OS e fJ 4.4 • _I _ Co R. .d` <a Tai 01 L. ■ I M Z•F y a C i T L 4+ L L • R'. a C .u U gam ., _ I a U _ O L O L N Go 5A E g.8 e C a • xa • L• a Z C oc L L F. ... C L L O IL 1. 0 O !. g V 7 . L �' L CO L L e a . . _ U a e € . ..- E. O > L . L q N n =N • • O U w 0 _ . O �. CC • C .r C _ g L O (E7 ••.. 0 0 L Y L'• K C Lq e a`- - E a 0. pp� ` C O L p O q 0 I O W O • • n 0•-� - a 8 7,.- <y a s 2 L T Y • 0 1.-L •✓ . CO N W W O. O 2 I ~ C qCq C H A I< O O •C • 70 • O �0 O L lLJ a O - O ILI •0 0 U CO C C O . C_ 7 • 2 1.1.1 U _ < � �l7 < a 44. N Oe L a r L 0. Lf,,� UU Q _ v W 2c cc E cc W p 7 I J 3 N 4 A. CO c C = ~ q C L ( ,.. Y O • L L _ U V W L ft- g 7 ID IX a a O W U < M-0 M O 0 >O V CI po 7 C VI U E° U a L L Q y OO L C 0. 7 • O 4.••-0 V^ C CO M 0•- m 4. • '� u O C ••. 7 -4 M 4+ • - L C C C Y >,.. ,,L . C ` L. O..- *< U 2 ...• . ,GCC . C7 o L E Y w OC C o O. 2 C E C a,. E — C N ›•-0 11Qp U a M U Le E. •• 0 7 a 4, M.N 3 CC •. E. 2.8 ✓U C C C O C C U.0 L 2 U U q C a C q • 0 a J ♦+ .0 C 12 CU 0 0 ~ 71 O C O O V C co C a Lo La S, L oc L 0 oC II O . U .-w L a g• a 0. C oc U >. 0. C •• •.. CI y L - 0 4• U.14 C L V C 0 07•C .4.- - U . L 4. L C . •$ N > C•.- C . •J O < 0_ • •LJ CP 3 61 > O III . mZt L U� -.• O7 .p C IA- U 4,w C. eV to s d CC CC • G7 0 CO m • a ill -13- C vM ® { C. ID .0 ell m a "t CD a )t Ca �ro • • RECOMMENDED RECOMMENOED - ACTiVITY/ DACE ANO RECOMMENDED NO.OF UNITS PER SERVICE LOCATION FACUTY REQUIREMENTS DIMENSIONS ORIENTATION • POPULATION RADIUS NOTES f4.lrw�oss .1420 mi.ft. Singles-17 t 44' Lore man..ettft••a.tP 1 per 5000 14%mi e Usually n sneak,no- Omelet-20'•M' .OSion corns,sr drrdo w44 5-....ufmnnfa l f4mi+Y Sao winking m.o on at Wes of Wm sous. • 5W0wm 1.Yam* 2400-3036+a ft. 41-50'•M' Long Stn nertf.soul 1 par 5000 X-ft mew Some s Poim not. • 2.ff*frmel 5040.7290 fa.ft. 50'a sit Omooer costs an 3LC llsa m 5100.7960 as ft 50 t 9s' montonmail and nom n•mwmy porn.per •••S uwaeaticw antis0 mammon swm tarts on as&wilt St Ws&pot*octanes. linim/ 600 m.It lot 4-nol, 20'•40'-lrntw.a Lore anon nortosouns 1 Ps 20.000 15.30.wires unveil 4wtl1 sores indoor 134 oats* 1000 b 3+.W a 10'to nor a 3. f From wails non,.wad, time as pert a muitioomom earn.Affinomen Mint. 217 foolip.3+rli..mrgr otatnood Olrami orldoor in ask Or rood stone. lasioar 22.000 t6 ft.incam ne Riot fly't 200' Lore awn nertwnertw Indoor-I pew 100.000. 5.1 was trempf tan. Clinor wpwtstt +raoo t ans. (.n.w..... 65.a 1661. it w000r Or0doet--dimoola on comolonmo..af.are AOWmnr 5000 M.ft Menus. no.of won.Bat as mrp.n a.. art of nrlt►p! forlMY. Tomas aMmor-om of 7200 31 t M.17'downer Lore Mn...ram- a. 1 amrt o•2000. 5.*ntda Ono in eotos.s of 2.4. AL et m•as avert. em Pow maw 21* Lomond w nortlrab. 42 ow fm comp/m./ raaowoOA Psis mats. to olkons .carry part Or Mimeo to mass& Vsrwr NYmsoos•M 4000 30'atilt."moms 1 Log nos mmoa.maf 1 omit Pat 6000. %A woke Sams s oar cart ea,ft. .overt Ow m o.srm. aabww(y.IMO. wars&.PomaOam.mil W � /.01111oiM 20.3s A wsawomo •Ooollom.GO' Lomb l.o+raAtb m I tole 5000 X.%woke Hat at w.rosrwooJ Aotme stows- ammo t7mmame oat■t.w.LA/Mad an W ammo son awm boom 1 issoM-1 our 20.000 AMP mot of same AIM airommios.MO' at Immo O.Lam from moony mwMw. Crow I••••••• dm000n 2.LUaa Lwsm.as 13 A wa.orw.ww •6oif.f4V p.fitala noorta.oaw fNaaor,amonlorl aaa4asra•at. Pat limow.201 Paoor fake-207- 2 0' P at Moro► Mlromowo 1.5A 161 w 300'.mm s H6 a•ao or 1 pat 20.000 15.'0 nowt awl Umsay pot of bear .wm■o d 10' salons*s ooamsm, tone Paf 101•111011.mow abafmoo at m mots., Far logs ot.tta, Seim w c monsoons mown m•••m. pat O mamma to WOO maisol. Pmololl MYwmmob 13A 101•340'woos Sacs in Nola Poo m. I as 20.000 • 15310 wtwms_mm Soso s fat hammy. nawroom d 1 MUD tl�b.m MI m apt. Some 1.7 to 2.1A 1941'to 225'•320'to Sams s time msomm. t me 10,000 1.2.map • ffomasr of wows Or 361 woo.10'at annals ow p.p.lat.',. nr.m oromaes eve col Yon*iaPr On 84041• soon or fat adlaaawt to -y 4- at nwgras • heed aorta • _fa tat-.Omme Ram 13.5A tor manor wn of 900.EGO...ea Aos Lowy ma aw►_s. I or 60.000 . 25 taw 1?wbtn for..ch I 30 ammo moor um •Yrt d•rt�tw rmrv.tmt vend.�1tr mach tonal ra a.`wog tomcod arm► m5rv,wa.N a a.eraaa on ,55w.n5ay fr rr51•a55rY ae.r...e. %4415-NEE T.s. 4.3A O.raN••dtlt-276' Lom wm a or 1 Per 20p00 155-30 moms trttsa Uma ly art of am amt m-603.07 tree,Meath le sank Took wroth for a to a to Loam .thee,,r M tow► lanes 037. mot am am.l.ns moony era oawasss in combenanusso wolf in""'"'"1—` bottler.mom,asp 9art.rw-90' Smarm Arteor. 1 r 5.000(if Woo %.x me Prtchrm dwrr.o—a y mod ter Y'e,.o, Si/.t dX1r•SO w r.e..4O'.-s o s ��) aw,rrwr for/?' Fm ertm9,1./d.5400t slow oath.May ate be hen,olss-227 g mai for Irma ost..aso tool lams hatamil Slow oro>M-777 attw,l 250 Imam 1 Maftlar fL._ 9.640 q.ft. 1217 a 8Q Cam Loa as of ears 1 r 50,000 1-2 MM. -U.m6.96141. am a••.mary r r 11m1m1 amai nerpn•rtR This N/A M/as claimed had.m- WA 1 1 maim ow moon N/A • Mom IQ metR east nm•.,aw.•as Irma 5% not be esaao 15%. Camay rove tra5ia- 40 Ittra room ra. • tram t/e.kr40 Mary Amgen,Hams Mamma 0.164 3017 Irmo or..t•.awwa Amor Mom alma 1 pr 50.000 10'cord•faassam t •co.45•. 30 avers m•sel List tit of a rsamewa/ Ip/r.Round eaSr eta wore m a amOit m Ma of rams raw► Mom of 30,deer meta s•wasd mom n.wwmam of 90'or 46'Mao eaw,mr. � �msasm iVw NM Moamar',70A All taaas and ttmm.atms Corm kirr d Tom NMI a are omit vaet.n an A air rrsN• 1 r 50.000 30 ammo trawl time Port d a rsysawsy ammo an r.y 130' maw mat/,mar ware Para mrmYt mar by 117 dam Mob fame"mama. msm o+tana arm it mmwaw mares am ..prapem.d t w/.re tail.100g..d.vela 14 a sal.Sl/a•fe6 mw mess•eantaamd ma. IC. is ow Manom ea•t s mnaas—05 306— radii Os aotml. OM 1.Par Masai •50410A •Aarge 1m5411sary 6002700 yam May d helm ea -� Y b 1 haw aasel Litt •Viols eo.ws tau ./rtiaeas 6556 mommedsss 756 Z Sims amdoM •yinwaaw60A • •ia.s, 150 •1000 O Ir yatls •filmy cows are emaawaatm 604 a NO pow*•al.Z/SAsa ammla6 •Mw 110A •�� Yam a •1/60,033 Cuomo tmwy 0a laver 5-w ammo ty or 411M111111 pat,fat Mara am Ito eras 20 oaks Nom analatiaw aroma. mwamhls I••s Vain sap aim•1 pail Tem tsi.r..a,aw..a of all wratu5 dram. 25"mat a 417 w. N••"�al11 mar 1 pm Zalow IS s 30 Iwi.a/as m•.ak worn I•••••••••tat %t•2A ow. at/w tie 1•4•1114 n`a frees slows`� .lam tftttmo d 3 m•taw. d 1,11m ad amiss w rests 316 Kee sad leemmy toe tm ar St platwm Oar e1 21m a 1mmm,ewt/amsw mm s e/amwaam ••••rl••a w•taw%J anlsafsYN,owl mow M 27 M•Mot 651 - Mimi wwmws rte • mar miaow r raw sears damns Brat tm r.Isatmra 2:1 dam ••∎••••laa tfm aid .�smart. 3w Mrs mamma.la. elms b amwwawy soar at=Mod aim Slmar Amts NIA memo arm amid hem WA 50 as,ft.of Mow ism WA WA Shmad Imam=Mbar 50 .ft.d was r rmaaM amt/•MEMO war.7twwwar awes worm of K ow 3.Two ama.ia d 3aA p•d� .-m-mmtm attamsrtam 1•m,6 Par A atasetmlesh s► d Os,sam. tawss6.saw s.tmsmm as c -15- i DEPARTMENT SERVICE DZSCRZPTION ' Department: Parks and Recreation ' Fund: General (001) 1 Goals: .! To provide comprehensive Park and Recreation services and facilities that meet the needs of the permanent and seasonal residents and visitors, through implementation of organized recreation programs and special events, provision of maintenance of parks and beaches, and to plan for the future needs for parks, recreation and recreation services for the growth of Collier County. Programs: IParks and Recreation Administration, Park Maintenance, Recreational Services, Beach and Water Services Discretionary Services - All of these services are discretionary but unary many are tied into Growth Management standards and requirements. III • Performance/Efficiency Measures: Planned Units 94/95 III Parks: Cost per acre maintained Acres (662.7) $3,520 Total park users - Community People 3,350,000 III Neighborhood, Beach & Water Recreation: Percent of budget returned in charges 38% III Cost per customer served Customers $1.10 Recreation users People 900,000 Classes/programs Programs New User hours - Hours New III Beach & Water: Beach Users People 1,300,000 Boat Ramp Users People 800,000 FY 92/93 FY 93/94 FY 93/94 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 ! II Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Appropriation Unit Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change i Personal Services 1;616,364 2,213,900 2,181,500 2,352,800 200,200 2,553,000 15:3% Operating Expenses 1,438,729 1,487,000 1,603,600 1,751,400 191,200 1,942,600 30.6% Capital Outlay 149,865 335,300 298,300 170,900 54,200 225,100 -32.9% Remit. to City 159,650 166,000 166,000 174,000 0 174,000 4.8! !It Total Appropriations 3,364,608 4,202,200 4,249,400 4,449,100 445,600 4,894,700 16.5% Revenues: ill Parks & Other Properties 41,760 10,100 900 0 0 0 -100.0% Beach & Water 122,221 155,600 120,200 120,100 0 120,100 -22.8% Recreation Programs 552,705 507,300 610,200 672,700 40,500 713,200 40.6% Total Revenues 716,686 673,000 731,300 792,800 40,500 833,300 23.8% Net Cost Gen']. Rev. 2,647,922 3,529,200 3,V.8,100 3,656,300 405,100 4,061,400 15.1% III Permanent Positions 62 62 64 64 8 72 16.1% Ill Page 168 I x Department: Parks and Recreation Fund: General (001) • Forecast 93/94 Forecast operating expenses will exceed the adopted budget by $116,600. This is attributable to a number of factors including: $18,000 for operating costs at Gulf Coast Little League Field, $18,100 for a 3 month phase-in of the Pelican Bay Park, and $33,000 to operate summer camps at Big Cypress, East Naples Middle School, and Vineyards Elementary School. In addition, electricity charges - $37,400, water/sewer charges - $59,000, and trash/garbage disposal fees $13,000, will exceed the adopted budget. This is due, in part, to prior year bills being paid during this fiscal year. Offsetting these increase was less utilization ($39,000) of contracted services at the Golden Gate Aquatic Facility and transferring off campus landscaping maintenance ($35,700) to Facilities Management. Revenue - Due to the transfer of off-campus landscaping maintenance to Facilities Management, ($10,100) revenue in Parks and Other Properties will not be received. Concession fee revenue is less than budgeted due to the revised agreement with the Registry Resort, in which the County receives 10% of gross sales (previously 20%) . Recreation program revenue will exceed the adopted budget due to the addition of 3 summer camps $67,000 and additional revenue from instructional services - $40,000. Current 94/95 Current personal services contains 2 additional positions above the FY94 adopted level. This is due to the addition of 2 maintenance positions added at the Pelican Bay Park site in FY94. The cost of these two positions is $53,600. There is also an additional $29,000 budgeted for 11 camp counselor positions required for summer camps at Big Cypress, East Naples Middle School and Vineyards Elementary School. There are a number of factors that contribute to the increase in current service operating expenses. There is $53,900 budgeted for annual operating costs of the Pelican Bay Park and $33,000 for operating costs of 3 additional summer camp facilities. There was a significant increase of $69,600 in allocated insurance premiums and allocated fleet management charges increased $44,300. Budgeted printing costs for brochures and "Leisure Line" increased $20,400 as additional copies will be printed. This cost will be offset by ad fees and increased program charges. Finally, based on actual usage, budgeted electricity charges - $40,400, water/sewer charges - $52,700, and garbage disposal fees - $13,000 have increased in FY 95. Capital outlay includes the following: $17,500 Replacement copier for the Administration section. $3,000 To plant sea oats at beach sites. $5,700 To replace carpeting at the Racquet Center and for flagpoles at Frank Mackle Park, East Naples Park, and Veteran's Park. $3,700 To upgrade cash register and computer at the Administration building. $8,000 Floor scrubbers. $10,000 Replace sod at Tommie Barfield Elementary School ballfield. $8,000 To replace fencing at Coconut Circle Park. $34,000 Upgrade lighting at park sites to County standards, light the remote control car area at U $15,000 Golden Gate Community Park, and light the play area at Aaron Lutz Park. Tennis and basketball court improvements: $6,000; Tommie Barfield - $6,000; Coconut Circle - $3,000. $66,000 Replace reel mower -$30,000; replace (2) 72" riding mowers - $20,000; replace (2) 52" mowers - $16,000. $170,900 Total U L Page 169 Department: Parks and Recreation (Cont.) _ Fund: General (001) Expanded 94/95 Parks and Other Property There is $182,800 budgeted for maintenance functions associated with the Vineyards Community Park. Costs include $77,600 for 2 Maintenance Worker II positions and a Crew Leader, $77,200 in operating expenses, and $28,000 in capital outlay. Capital costs include a vehicle and radio, and maintenance equipment. (Discretionary) There is $102,000 budgeted for a 9-month phase-in of the Golden Gate Estates Park. Costs include 540,100 for a Maintenance Worker II and a Crew Leader, $35,700 in operating expenses, and $26,200 for a vehicle and radio and maintenance equipment. (Discretionary) Recreation Programs There is $2,700 budgeted to upgrade a Program Leader II to a Park Program Supervisor (and $30,000 budgeted in Community Park impact fees) for the purchase of weights and fitness equipment.) This would allow the department to operate a fitness center at the Golden Gate Community Park. Memberships would be sold to the public and County employees at a discount. Revenues of $12,500 would be generated. There is. $158,100 for recreational programming at the Vineyards Community Park. Costs include $79,800 for a Park Program Supervisor, a Program Leader II, and a Community Center Aide, and $78,300 in operating expenses. There is $28,000 budgeted in revenue from recreational and instructional fees and concession revenues. (Discretionary) i I M r • • r N a r i• U Page 170 DEPARTMENT SERVICE DESCRIPTION Department: Parks and Recreation VIIFund: 111 MSTD Goals: +! To provide comprehensive Park and Recreation services and facilities that meet the needs of the permanent and seasonal residents and visitors, through implementation of organized recreation programs and special events, provision of maintenance of parks and beaches, and to plan for the future needs for parks, allrecreation and recreation services for the growth of Collier County. Programs: illParks and Recreation Administration, Park Maintenance, Recreational Services, Beach and Water Services IIIDiscretionary Services All of these services are discretionary but many are tied into Growth Management standards and Ill requirements. Performance/Efficiency Measures: Planned Units 94/95 Parks: Cost per acre maintained Acres (67.3) $8,812 NITotal park users - Community People 350,000 Neighborhood, Boat Ramp Users Pp Recreation: Percent of budget returned in charges 13.2% Cost per customer served Customers $1.38 III Recreation users People 110,000 Classes/programs Programs New User hours - (new measurement) Hours New IIII Beach & Water: Boat Ramp Users People 120,000 IIIFY 92/93 FY 93/94 FY 93/94 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 -% Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget • Appropriation Unit Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Personal Services 306,758 353,300 344,000 357,400 224,100 581,500 64.6% Operating Expenses 193,325 229,500 241,400 198,800 237,600 436,400 90.21 Capital Outlay 67,145 50,000 50,000 146,400 31,200 177,600 255.2% Total Appropriations 567,228 632,800 635,400 702,600 492,900 1,195,500 88.9% Less: Revenues/Rec. 24,505 23,400 20,900 23,600 54,300 77,900 232.9% Net Cost Gen'l Rev. 542,723 609,400 614,500 679,000 438,600 1,117,600 83.4% IllPermanent Positions 11 11 11 11 11 22 100.01 IL Page 171 Department: Parks and Recreation Fund: 111 MSTD Forecast 93/94 An additional $9,800 was spent on a survey and OCPM construction management fees associated with upgrading the Immokalee Little League field to County standards. Current 94/95 The indirect service charge payment to th4 General Fund (001) allocated to the Parks and Recreation Department ($34,100 in FY94) is now budgeted in the Other General Administrative cost center in FY95. There is also $2,000 budgeted for food as HISS requires that snacks be provided to attendees of Parks programming. Capital outlay consists of the following items: $20,000 Repair of Airport Park picnic pavilion $20,000 Replace entrance sign and landscaping at Immokalee Community Park entrance. $50,000 Replace playground equipment at Immokalee Community Park. $30,000 Replace playground equipment at the south Immokalee park. $20,000 Replace (2) 72• riding mowers. $6,400 Flooring cleaning machine and replacement air hockey, foosball, and bumper pool games. Expanded 94/95 There is $329,600 budgeted for the 6 month phase-in of recreational programming associated with the Immokalee Pool/Recreation Center. There is $199,300 budgeted for (7) Program Leader II positions, (2) Cashier positions, (10) Lifeguard positions (20 hours per week) , and (7) Attendants (locker room/cashier positions - 20 hours per week) . There is $130,300 budgeted in operating expenses. Contracted services account for $77,500 of this amount for school bus rentals, summer camps, and program instructors. Other principal operating supplies include minor operating equipment and supplies $32,000, telephone $2,000, clothing and uniform purchases $3,800, food for summer camp participants $2,200 and medical supplies $2,500. There is also $163,300 budgeted for the 6 month phase-in of maintenance functions associated with the Immokalee Pool/Recreation Center. There are 2 Maintenance Worker II positions require at a cost of $24,800. There is also $107,300 budgeted in operating expenses. Principal operating expenses include $65,000 for electricity and water/sewer charges, $20,000 - chemicals, fertilizer and institutional supplies, insurance $5,000, motor pool charges $3,000, telephones $1,000, garbage disposal $1,000, and minor operating equipment/supplies $6,000. Capital outlay includes a pick-up truck and radio ($16,200) for the maintenance crew and $15,000 in maintenance equipment (floor stripper and buffer) for the Recreation Center. i1 N a a 1 Page 172 I DEPJIRTMENT SERVICE DESCRIPTION ' Department: Parks and Recreation Fund: 119 - Food Service Program Grant Goals: To serve lunches and snacks to eligible participants ages 18 years and under, during the summer camp time frame. Eligible participant areas are determined by the State of Florida using a salary survey as guidelines. Programs: Eligible summer camp and area participants served snack and lunch er State Food Grant. ant. All costs reimbursed by the State of Florida. I Discretionary Services IIIAll monies reimbursed by State. , Performance/Efficiency Measures: UPlanned Units 94/95 Snacks 21,000 ICI Lunches 36,000 FY 92/93 FY 93/94 FY 93/94 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 t Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Nage , Appropriation Unit Exp/Rev • Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Operating Expenses 86,289 98,400 122,800 141,600 0 141,600 43.9% IIITransfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Appropriations 86,289 98,400 122,800 141,600 0 141,600 43.9% IIRevenues: . Carry Forward 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A IIGrant 86,289 98,400 122,800 141,600 0 141,600 43.9% Total Revenues 86,289 98,400 122,800 141,600 0 141,600 43.9% IIICurrent 94/95 The Summer Food Grant Program will provide lunches at 15 sites due to additional grant funds. III III i 11 Page 173 DSPARTIaNT SZRVICZ DZSCRIPTION II Department: Parks and Recreation • Fund: Golden Gate Community Center Fund (130) Goals: .! To continue the positive involvement of the community and continue to implement programs which address li all the community members. Programs: Programming, scheduling and public relations for Golden Gate Community Center II Discretionary Services All of these services are discretionary but many are tied into Growth Management standards and I requirements. Performance/Efficiency Measures: II Planned Units 94/95 Meeting Rooms hours 10,000 II Game Rooms hours 10,000 Camp hours 1,500 • ill FY 92/93 FY 93/94 FY 93/94 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 FY 94/95 t Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Appropriation Unit Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change III Personal Services 89,412 102,400 102,400 131,300 52,000 183,300 79.0% Operating Expenses_ 68,931 69,200 80,500 67,700 66,900 134,600 94.5% III Capital Outlay 58,417 95,500 88,500 40,500 20,000 60,500 -36.6% Transfers 43,490 50,700 48,300 54,500 100 54,600 7.7% Attrition 0 0 0 (2,200) (1,200) (3,400) N/A Reserves 43 11,500 0 24,200 7,000 31,200 171.3% Total Appropriations 260,293 329,300 319,700 316,000 144,800 460,800 39.91 r . ill Revenues: Ad Valorem Taxes 219,202 235,200 225,800 233,600 4,000 237,600 1.0% Misc. Revenues 41,689 38,500 47,200 39,700 16,200 55,900 45.2% III Transfer (001) 0 0 0 33,300 125,700 159,000 N/A Carry Forward 69,305 69,300 69,900 23,200 0 23,200 -66.5% Revenue Reserve 0 (13,700) 0 (13,800) (1,100) (14,900) 8.8% III Total Revenues 330,196 329,300 342,900 316,000 144,800 460,800 39.91 Permanent Positions 4 4 4 4 2 6 50.0% III I. II U Page 174 li r I Department: Parks and Recreation Fund: Golden Gate Community Center Fund (130) Forecast 93/94 Forecast operating expenses exceed the adopted budget due to additional costs of Latch Key Summer Camp operating supplies and $8,000 budgeted in capital outlay for purchase of tables and chairs was expended from operating expenses due to unit costs being less than $500. Revenue - Additional forecast miscellaneous revenues 4rFlude $4,400 for Latch Key Summer Camp, $2,000 from facility rental fees, and $2,100 in interest earnings. Current 94/95 The large increase in personal services is attributable to budgeting $20,000 for Latch Key Program Counselors, which was previously budgeted as a contracted service. There is a decrease in operating expenses resulting from this change. Increase in operating expenses include $5,400 to replace additional tables and chairs, $1,600 for insurance and $1,600 for the indirect service charge payment to the General Fund. Capital outlay includes $38,000 to replace the tile floor in the existing community center building and replace window treatments in the auditorium and rooms A and B. There is $1,500 to begin improvements to the back lawn area and $1,000 to replace the sound system in rooms A and B. Transfers include a debt service payment of $46,500 on the bonds which financed the original construction of the facility. The final debt service payments on the bonds is in 1996. The balance of funds budgeted as transfers are to the Tax Collector and Property Appraiser. There is 2% attrition budgeted as per the adopted BCC budget policy. The large increase in reserves is to establish a capital reserve for the roof and air conditioning system which were replaced recently. Revenue - The Golden Gate Community Center is being expanded from 10,000 sq. ft. to approximately 25,000 sq. ft. The expanded portion of the facility will be available to all County residents. As such costs of the facility will be prorated according the relative square footage - 40% to the MSTU and 60% to the General Fund. The expanded facility is estimated to be completed in April 1995. Existing staff costs for the first 6 months will be charged to the MSTU and split 60%-40t for the balance of the year. As such there is a budgeted transfer from the General Fund of $33,300 for its pro-rata share of current personnel costs. Expanded 94/95 (Funded by General Fund) There are funds budgeted for a 6 month phase in of the expanded facility. Personnel costs of $44,400 are for a Program Leader II, a Community Center Aide, a part-time Community Center Aide, and Latch Key Program Counselors. Principal operating costs are for utilities $21,500, minor operating equipment such as tables and chairs $15,000, and insurance $5,200. Capital outlay includes $3,000 for additional landscaping, $2,000 for audio/visual equipment, $5,000 for a computer network, and $9,000 for computerized cash registers. (MSTU funded) There is $1,000 budgeted for a laser printer to enhance in-house desk-top publishing capabilities. There is $7,600 budgeted to increase a part-time Community Center Aide to permanent full-time status. Expanded Revenue - Miscellaneous revenue is from summer camp fees and facility rental charges. The Golden Gate Community Center pro-rata share of the proposed reclassification's/upgrades and cost of a color printer requires $4,000 in ad valorem taxes. The balance of funding is a transfer from the General Fund (001) of $125,700. U U I Page 175 r Collier County Parks 4 Rec. Department TY 95 Capital Improvement Program SI' ary of Parks CIP Lunde Purpose: IIII This summary illustrates the FY95 Park and Recreation Capita . mprovement Program. The primary revenue sources are impact fees and ad valorem taxes. FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 FY 95 CIE Project Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund NO. TITLE/DESCRIPTION Total 306 345 368 362 366 361 363 365 367 ill704 Immok Rec. Ctr./Pool 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 702 S Naples Pk Land ace 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 708 GG Pool/Shade Structure 75.0 10.0 25.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 712 GG Estates Pk 30.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 716 Athletic Fields 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roller Rink E. Naples 70.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BBall Court Cover Veter 140.0 0.0 0.0 140.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fitness/Cashiering Equi 45.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Caxambas Env. Cleanup 200.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IIIII Lutz Pk. Cts. Renovatio 47.3 47.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Bayview Pk. Rest Rooms 75.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 716 Gulf Coast L.L. 76.0 76.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 720 G.G. Comm Ctr. 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4 0.0 10.4 III Immok. L.L. Field 173.6 32.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 141.2 0.0 717 Tigertail Parking 116.0 0.0 116.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 719 Clam Pass Bdw. Repair 90.0 90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 lir719 Clam Pass Utilities 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 715 V. Bch. Walkover 83.0 0.0 83.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Barefoot Bch Additions 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 all 710 Bayview B. Lanes/Parkin 532.0 0.0 532.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Naples Pier 283.1 283.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Naples Landing Phase Z 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Naples Boat Ramp 60.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Reimburse Impact Fees 23.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Reserves 1,075.5 0.0 45.5 918.3 67.7 36.6 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 Total Expenditures 4,970.3 993.8 841.5 1,253.3 667.7 1,036.6 0.0 15.4 151.6 10.4 Ell Revenue AllImpact Pees 1,590.9 0.0 563.8 1,006.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 Trans Prop Taxes 627.2 627.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grants 156.0 156.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 all Carry Forward 2,620.9 211.7 297.4 287.7 653.4 1,017.6 0.0 14.8 128.2 10.1 Interest/Mist. 66.1 7.0 8.9 10.0 15.0 20.0 0.0 0.7 4.2 0.3 Rev Reserve (90.8) (8.1) (28.6) (51.0) (0.7) (1.0) 0.0 (0.1) (1.3) 0.0 IIITotal Revenue 4,970.3 993.8 841.5 1,253.3 667.7 1,036.6 0.0 15.4 151.6 10.4 I Ili Page 259 r