Loading...
CEB Minutes 09/24/2015 September 24, 2015 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD Naples, Florida, September 24, 2015 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Code Enforcement Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Chairman: Robert Kaufman Robert Ashton Lisa Chapman Bushnell (Alternate) Sue Curley (Alternate) Ron Doino Gerald J. Lefebvre James Lavinski Lionel L'Esperance Tony Marino ALSO PRESENT: Kerry Adams, Code Enforcement Tamara Lynne Nicola, Attorney to the Board Page 1 CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA Date: September 24, 2015 at 9:00 A.M. Location: 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34104 NOTICE: THE RESPONDENT MAY BE LIMITED TO TWENTY (20) MINUTES FOR CASE PRESENTATION UNLESS ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE BOARD. PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE PUBLIC HEARING ARE ASKED TO OBSERVE ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER AND SPEAK ONE AT A TIME SO THAT THE COURT REPORTER CAN RECORD ALL STATEMENTS BEING MADE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. NEITHER COLLIER COUNTY NOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THIS RECORD. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL Robert Kaufman, Chair Gerald Lefebvre, Vice Chair Lionel L' Esperance Tony Marino 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. August 27, 2015 Hearing 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MOTIONS A. Motions Motion for Continuance Motion for Extension of Time Ron Doino James Lavinski Robert Ashton Lisa Chapman Bushnell, Alternate Sue Curley, Alternate B. Stipulations C. Hearings 1. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: FOLIO NO: VIOLATION ADDRESS: 2. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: FOLIO NO: VIOLATION ADDRESS: 3. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: FOLIO NO: VIOLATION ADDRESS: 4. CASE NO: OWNER: OFFICER: VIOLATIONS: FOLIO NO: VIOLATION ADDRESS: CESD20150013679 LIN LIN WANG INVESTIGATOR ERIC SHORT COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04 -41, SECTIONS 10.02.06(B)(1)(A) AND 10.02.06(B)(1)(E)(I). UNPERMITTED STRUCTURAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, AND HVAC ALTERATIONS TO THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. 193560004 1747 ACREMAKER RD, NAPLES CESD20150002903 DIAPAZON USA LLC INVESTIGATOR DELICIA PULSE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04 -41, SECTION 10.02.06(B)(1)(A) AND (E). WALL INSTALLED WITH ELECTRIC, DOORS AND CEILING TILES INSTALLED AND NO PERMITS OBTAINED. 76720002464 3573 ENTERPRISE AVE, UNIT: 73, NAPLES CESD20150003476 DIAPAZON USA LLC INVESTIGATOR DELICIA PULSE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04 -41, SECTION 10.02.06(B)(1)(A) AND (E). HYDROLIC CAR JACK INSTALLED AND NO PERMIT OBTAINED. 76720000602 3435 ENTERPRISE AVE, UNIT: 30, NAPLES CELU20150014734 370 COMMERCIAL LLC INVESTIGATOR DELICIA PULSE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 0441 AS AMENDED, SECTION 2.02.03 AND SECTION 4.02.12 (A).VERY LARGE PILES OF LANDSCAPING BEING STORED ON THE PROPERTY. (NO SCREENING) (APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET TALL. PILES ENCOMPASSED APPROXIMATELY 3/4 OF THE PROPERTY). 271480006 370 COMMERCIAL BLVD, NAPLES 5. CASE NO: CENA20150010989 OWNER: ANNA VOLPE TRUST EST OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR PATRICK BALDWIN VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY CODE LAWS AND ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 54, ARTICLE VI, SECTION 54 -181. ABANDONED BOAT IN DISREPAIR ON THE UNIMPROVED ESTATES ZONED PROPERTY. FOLIO NO: 38054920001 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 3060 39TH ST SW, NAPLES 6. CASE NO: CESD20150011945 OWNER: NAPLES PARK TRUST NO 778100 OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR JON HOAGBOON VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04 -41, SECTION 10.02.06(B)(1)(A). EXPIRED PERMIT, REQUIRED FINAL INSPECTIONS AND OBTAIN CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. FOLIO NO: 62780720004 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 778 100TH AVE N, NAPLES B. Motion for Reduction of Fines/Lien. 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines/Liens 1. CASE NO: CESD20140018722 OWNER: MICHAEL RAINS & LINDA RAINS OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR STEVEN LOPEZ - SILVERO VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04 -41, AS AMENDED, SECTION 10.02.06 (B)(1)(A). A POLE BARN (APROXIMATELY 30'X 50') IN THE REAR YARD OF IMPROVED OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE REQUIRED PERMIT(S), INSPECTIONS, AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. FOLIO NO: 01134800104 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 537 HARMON TER, COPELAND 2. CASE NO: CESD20120013716 OWNER: BRANISLAVA CIRAKOVIC VUKOVIC, GINA RADENKOVICH, AND ALEKSANDAR H. RADENKOVICH OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR JON HOAGBOON VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 0441 AS AMENDED, SECTIONS 10.02.06(B)(1)(A), 10.02.06(B)(1)(E), AND 10.02.06(B)(1)(E)(I). OBSERVED ALTERATIONS /IMPROVEMENTS TO STRUCTURE/PROPERTY AND NO COLLIER COUNTY PERMITS OBTAINED FOLIO NO: 62578800000 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 10580 6TH ST, NAPLES 3. CASE NO: CEPM20140025426 OWNER: LYNNE V CADENHEAD OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR CHRISTOPHER AMBACH VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 22 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS, ARTICLE VI PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, SECTION 22- 231(12)(Q) AND SECTION 22 -236. A VACANT RESIDENTIAL HOME DECLARED DANGEROUS BY THE COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL. FOLIO NO: 74414040006 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 3414 CHEROKEE ST, NAPLES B. Motion to Rescind Previously Issued Order C. Motion to Amend Previously Issued Order 7. NEW BUSINESS 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Request to Forward Cases to County Attorney's Office as Referenced in Submitted Executive Summary. 9. REPORTS 10. COMMENTS 11. NEXT MEETING DATE - October 22, 2015 12. ADJOURN 4 CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AGENDA Date: September 24,2015 at 9:00 A.M. Location: 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL 34104 NOTICE: THE RESPONDENT MAY BE LIMITED TO TWENTY(20) MINUTES FOR CASE PRESENTATION UNLESS ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE BOARD. PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO FIVE (5)MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE PUBLIC HEARING ARE ASKED TO OBSERVE ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER AND SPEAK ONE AT A TIME SO THAT THE COURT REPORTER CAN RECORD ALL STATEMENTS BEING MADE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO,AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE,WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.NEITHER COLLIER COUNTY NOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THIS RECORD. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL Robert Kaufman,Chair Ron Doino Gerald Lefebvre,Vice Chair James Lavinski Lionel L'Esperance Robert Ashton Tony Marino Lisa Chapman Bushnell,Alternate Sue Curley,Alternate 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. August 27,2015 Hearing 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MOTIONS A. Motions Motion for Continuance Motion for Extension of Time 1 B. Stipulations C. Hearings 1. CASE NO: CESD20150013679 OWNER: LIN LIN WANG OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR ERIC SHORT VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04-41,SECTIONS 10.02.06(B)(1)(A)AND 10.02.06(B)(1)(E)(I). UNPERMITTED STRUCTURAL,PLUMBING,ELECTRICAL,AND HVAC ALTERATIONS TO THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. FOLIO NO: 193560004 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 1747 ACREMAKER RD,NAPLES 2. CASE NO: CESD20150002903 OWNER: DIAPAZON USA LLC OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR DELICIA PULSE VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04-41,SECTION 10.02.06(BXI)(A)AND(E). WALL INSTALLED WITH ELECTRIC,DOORS AND CEILING TILES INSTALLED AND NO PERMITS OBTAINED. FOLIO NO: 76720002464 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 3573 ENTERPRISE AVE,UNIT:73,NAPLES 3. CASE NO: CESD20150003476 OWNER: DIAPAZON USA LLC OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR DELICIA PULSE VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04-41,SECTION 10.02.06(B)(1)(A)AND(E). HYDROLIC CAR JACK INSTALLED AND NO PERMIT OBTAINED. FOLIO NO: 76720000602 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 3435 ENTERPRISE AVE,UNIT:30,NAPLES 4. CASE NO: CELU20150014734 OWNER: 370 COMMERCIAL LLC OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR DELICIA PULSE VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04-41 AS AMENDED,SECTION 2.02.03 AND SECTION 4.02.12(A).VERY LARGE PILES OF LANDSCAPING BEING STORED ON THE PROPERTY.(NO SCREENING) (APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET TALL.PILES ENCOMPASSED APPROXIMATELY 3/4 OF THE PROPERTY). FOLIO NO: 271480006 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 370 COMMERCIAL BLVD,NAPLES 2 5. CASE NO: CENA20150010989 OWNER: ANNA VOLPE TRUST EST OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR PATRICK BALDWIN VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY CODE LAWS AND ORDINANCES,CHAPTER 54,ARTICLE VI,SECTION 54-181.ABANDONED BOAT IN DISREPAIR ON THE UNIMPROVED ESTATES ZONED PROPERTY. FOLIO NO: 38054920001 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 3060 39TH ST SW,NAPLES 6. CASE NO: CESD20150011945 OWNER: NAPLES PARK TRUST NO 778100 OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR JON HOAGBOON VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04-41,SECTION 10.02.06(B)(1)(A). EXPIRED PERMIT,REQUIRED FINAL INSPECTIONS AND OBTAIN CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. FOLIO NO: 62780720004 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 778 100TH AVE N,NAPLES B. Motion for Reduction of Fines/Lien. 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Motion for Imposition of Fines/Liens 1. CASE NO: CESD20140018722 OWNER: MICHAEL RAINS&LINDA RAINS OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR STEVEN LOPEZ-SILVERO VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04-41,AS AMENDED,SECTION 10.02.06 (B)(1)(A).A POLE BARN(APROXIMATELY 30'X 50')IN THE REAR YARD OF IMPROVED OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE REQUIRED PERMIT(S),INSPECTIONS,AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. FOLIO NO: 01134800104 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 537 HARMON TER,COPELAND 2. CASE NO: CESD20120013716 OWNER: BRANISLAVA CIRAKOVIC VUKOVIC,GINA RADENKOVICH,AND ALEKSANDAR H. RADENKOVICH OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR JON HOAGBOON VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 04-41 AS AMENDED,SECTIONS 10.02.06(B)(1)(A), 10.02.06(B)(1)(E),AND 10.02.06(B)(1)(E)(I). OBSERVED ALTERATIONS/IMPROVEMENTS TO STRUCTURE/PROPERTY AND NO COLLIER COUNTY PERMITS OBTAINED FOLIO NO: 62578800000 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 10580 6TH ST,NAPLES 3 3. CASE NO: CEPM20140025426 OWNER: LYNNE V CADENHEAD OFFICER: INVESTIGATOR CHRISTOPHER AMBACH VIOLATIONS: COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES,CHAPTER 22 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS,ARTICLE VI PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE,SECTION 22- 231(12)(Q)AND SECTION 22-236.A VACANT RESIDENTIAL HOME DECLARED DANGEROUS BY THE COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL. FOLIO NO: 74414040006 VIOLATION ADDRESS: 3414 CHEROKEE ST,NAPLES B. Motion to Rescind Previously Issued Order C. Motion to Amend Previously Issued Order 7. NEW BUSINESS 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Request to Forward Cases to County Attorney's Office as Referenced in Submitted Executive Summary. 9. REPORTS 10. COMMENTS 11. NEXT MEETING DATE- October 22,2015 12. ADJOURN 4 September 24, 2015 CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Good morning. I'd like to call the Code Enforcement Board to order. Notice: The respondent may be limited to 20 minutes for case presentation unless additional time is granted by the Board. Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item will receive up to five minutes unless time is adjusted by the Chairman. All parties participating in the public hearing are asked to observe Robert's Rules of Order and speak one at a time so that the court reporter can record all statements being made. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto -- which is a tongue twister -- and, therefore, may need to record -- to ensure that the verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Neither Collier County nor the Code Enforcement Board shall be responsible for providing this record. We don't have very many people here today, but for the folks that are here, if you would turn your phones to silence, we will begin with the pledge. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. I'm going to go out of order here a little bit. As far as the approval of the minutes, anybody have any comments on the minutes? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Hearing none, all those in favor of approving them? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. Page 2 September 24, 2015 MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Carries unanimously. Now, do we have any changes on the agenda? MR. LEFEBVRE: How about roll call? CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Yeah, we'll get to the roll call. MS. ADAMS: We do. Number 5, public hearings, motions, A, motions, motion for extension of time. We have one addition. It's from Imposition of Fines No. 2, Tab 8, Case CESD20120013716, Branislava Cirakovic Vukovic, Gina Radenkovich, and Aleksandar H. Radenkovich. Letter B, stipulations, we have three additions. The first is No. 1 from hearings, Tab 1, Case CESD20150013679, Lin Lin Wang; the second is No. 2 from hearings, Tab 2, Case CESD20150002903, Diapazon USA, LLC; the third is No. 3 from hearings, Tab 3, Case CESD20150003476, Diapazon USA, LLC. Letter C, hearings, No. 4, Tab 4, Case CELU20150014734, 370 Commercial, LLC, has been withdrawn. Number 5, Tab 5, Case CENA20150010989, Anna Volpe Trust Estate, has been withdrawn. Number 6, Tab 6, Case CESD20150011945, Naples Park Trust, No. 778100, has been withdrawn. Number 6, old business, A, motion for imposition of fines/liens, No. 3, Tab 9, Case CEPM20140025426, Lynne V. Cadenhead, has been withdrawn. And that's all the changes. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. We should do a roll call before we vote on the changes to the agenda, if you will. MS. ADAMS: Mr. Robert Kaufman? Page 3 September 24, 2015 CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Here. MS. ADAMS: Mr. Gerald Lefebvre? MR. LEFEBVRE: Here. MS. ADAMS: Mr. Lionel L'Esperance? MR. L'ESPERANCE: Here. MS. ADAMS: Mr. Tony Marino? MR. MARINO: Here. MS. ADAMS: Mr. Ron Doino? MR. DOINO: Present. MS. ADAMS: Mr. James Lavinski? MR. LAVINSKI: Here. MS. ADAMS: Mr. Robert Ashton? MR. ASHTON: Here. MS. ADAMS: Ms. Lisa Chapman Bushnell? MS. BUSHNELL: Here. MS. ADAMS: And, Ms. Sue Curley? MS. CURLEY: Here. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Well, we're all here. Okay. Let's vote on the changes to the agenda. I'd like a motion to amend. MR. LAVINSKI: Motion to amend the agenda. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: And a second. All those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. Page 4 September 24, 2015 CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Carries unanimously. Okay. MS. ADAMS: First case, motion for extension of time from Imposition of Fines No. 2, Tab 8, Case CESD20120013716, Branislava Cirakovic Vukovic, Gina Radenkovich, and Aleksandar H. Radenkovich. MS. VUKOVIC: Good morning. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Good morning. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN REPORTER: Could you state your name. MS. VUKOVIC: Branislava Cirakovic Vukovic. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. For the Board, this is the case that was handwritten that was on your position when you got here this morning. Okay. Why don't you let us know what you're requesting and why. MS. VUKOVIC: We're still requesting the extension due to zoning decisions by Mr. Fred Reischl and planning -- Zoning Department. And they still didn't come to the conclusion of how to resolve the situation. So basically they told me to ask for another extension. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. And the county says? MR. HOAGBOON: Sir, we have no objection. For the record, John Hoagboon, Collier County Code Enforcement. They're just waiting on a reschedule for the hearing for the variance hearing. That's all it is, basically. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. And how much time do you think you would need? Page 5 September 24, 2015 MS. VUKOVIC: Between 90 to 180 days; I don't know. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: One hundred eighty days being six months. We could certainly go shorter than that. I mean, this thing has been going on since May 23rd, 2013. And I realize that you're waiting for the county to move, but I would think that a zoning meeting is held sooner rather than later as far as this is concerned. MR. HOAGBOON: It has to go through the BCC process, and I think that's why there might be a little bit more time involved, and that's probably the cause for the need for a little bit more time requested. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Has the county given you any indication of when they're going to have their meeting to go through this? MS. VUKOVIC: I didn't get any correspondence yet. MR. HOAGBOON: Sir, it's pending at this time. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Mr. Lefebvre? MR. LEFEBVRE: I don't understand why we're almost two-and-a-half years down the road, and we're still waiting for a zoning variance. There's many processes that take a much shorter time that are much more involved in this, including rezoning a piece of property from it being an agricultural piece including, and I've said this phrase multiple times, building a high-rise. So, again, I don't understand why this is taking so long. We're again, two-and-a-half years out from the original case. MS. VUKOVIC: I'm happy to do whatever you guys say. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: No, we understand. And -- MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, that's what -- I mean, every time you come in front of us you tell us -- it doesn't seem like there's ever going to be an end to this case. I mean -- CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Let me pose a suggestion, for whatever it's worth. If we were to grant, for instance, a 60-day Page 6 September 24, 2015 extension and any other further extensions we'd require a letter from the county stating why they haven't been able to move on this either in a positive or a negative vain and go from there. Put the county on notice that they need to come up with an answer. MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, I don't know if it's so much the county as is the respondent. I mean, if this was the route they were taking, I want to know when they started taking this route to go for the variance. If they realized back a year and a half ago that they could not do what they wanted to do without a variance -- and I don't remember the specifics of the case. Was it that you have two residences or something? What was the original case? MS. VUKOVIC: Well, any time you want to do the process, they will not start it unless you give the money, like -- I think it's $5,000. So I did it, like, a while ago. So they still -- like, when you apply for a rezoning, that's the beginning. And since then, you know, I'm still waiting. MR. LEFEBVRE: But was this a case where it's a house that was a duplex, but it was -- MS. VUKOVIC: In the Collier County records it shows as a duplex, and that's how I bought it. MR. LEFEBVRE: Okay. That's how you bought it. So you want to keep it as a duplex? MS. VUKOVIC: Correct, yeah. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: And the zoning in that area says it is a single-family; is that it? MS. VUKOVIC: Yeah, which is a discrepancy which Collier County had it recorded. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: So you're asking for a variance to grant a two-family or a duplex in an area that was previously zoned for single-family, so then the county -- MS. VUKOVIC: At this point I really don't care any longer. I Page 7 September 24, 2015 mean, whatever you guys decide, whatever county -- whatever Planning decides, I'm fine. I mean, it's property, I do -- actually, one of the people you have on the thing is actually deceased. And he -- the coroner (sic), so, you know, so you might want to take it out from -- CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Is it possible for the county to contact our friends in zoning and see when this will be resolved? MR. HOAGBOON: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: And maybe if it's not resolved in whatever time we grant for an extension, should we grant an extension, that that be presented to the Board. MR. HOAGBOON: Yep. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: So we cut the end of the tunnel on this, where it's not a train there hitting us in the face. MR. HOAGBOON: I don't see any issue with that. You know, just to reiterate on what she said, they've done everything that's been required of them. They had everything posted as far as, like, you know, for the area at the HEX hearing, and at the last minute, you know, the county stepped in and said, hey, this needs to go a little bit more further -- you know, suggested it for the BCC, so -- but I think we could do that. We can go ahead and contact them with that regard. MR. LEFEBVRE: What I want to know is at what point did the respondent realize, I have to go for a variance, and when was that variance applied for? Because it should have been pretty evident much sooner that you needed to go this route, and it should not have -- I just don't know why it's taken as long as it has. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: When did you purchase -- when did you purchase the property? MS. VUKOVIC: I did apply in February 2013 for a variance. That was the application fee which I said, so -- but, again, for some reason, maybe because of that discrepancy, that's what it is. I believe I purchased it 2007. Page 8 September 24, 2015 CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. And 2013, that's when this case began, May of 2013, you had applied for a variance? MS. VUKOVIC: Yeah. I wasn't aware that it wasn't a duplex at all because -- CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. MS. VUKOVIC: -- on the Collier County it shows as duplex. It still shows, if you go to Collier County Appraiser. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Well, I think to bring this to an end one way or the other that the county needs to step up and to provide information to the Board within a reasonable period of time. If somebody wants to make a motion to that effect or any effect, or any other comments from the Board. MR. LEFEBVRE: Have you thought about seeking legal representation for this? MS. VUKOVIC: I mean, you know, it doesn't do any good, because it's not in my side. It's about planning, zoning, county. You know, so where I'm standing, it doesn't make any difference to me except that I have to come to the meetings. And I'm happy to come. But, again, if they say yes, great; if they say no, it's okay with me, too. You know, like I -- at this point it's been so long, so, you know, it's a -- I'm just in this process, and -- to be honest with you. It doesn't matter for me if I hired an attorney. I don't think it's going to make it any faster. It's just -- it's going to cost me even more. MR. LEFEBVRE: Again, to rezone a property where you're building homes or commercial doesn't take two-and-a-half years. A comprehensive land use change doesn't take two-and-a-half years to do, and we're at two-and-a-half years now. So that's what I'm trying to get at. What I'm trying to get at, right now it doesn't seem like there's any pressure to have this completed because we keep on giving you extensions every three months, six months that you come here. We're Page 9 September 24, 2015 MS. VUKOVIC: I really don't feel like you're giving, personally, me. I think you're giving that to the process, and that's what I feel. Because, again, whatever I had to fill it out and to give, I do. But it's not my decision at this point. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: I really believe that this is where the county -- I mean, if you applied for a variance in May of 2013, we may be asking the respondent the question that should be asked of the county. Why have they not come back with a yes or no in two years? MR. MARINO: Three. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Three years. A long time. MR. MARINO: I agree. MR. HOAGBOON: Sir, just to interject, they've done everything that's been asked of them. They've met all the deadlines, you know, for each and every, you know, issuance of the variance in the -- you know, the process involved, and it was just this last stage where it was asked, you know, rescheduled and go to the BCC process. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Yeah. And the county will do one of two things; they'll either approve the variance or they won't, and then the case will be over. The respondent will know which direction they're going in, and we're done. But I don't know that -- well, I think that the Board should have the authority to require the county to respond at least to the Board saying we are going to have an answer on this variance by such and such a date. MR. MARINO: How would you like to handle it? CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Yeah, yeah. We don't hear variances here, but I get your point. So I would propose that we grant some sort of an extension and then also if the county will contact the county, if you will -- and ask them for some definitive date on when this thing is going to be revolved. MR. HOAGBOON: Absolutely. Page 10 September 24, 2015 CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: So if anybody would like to take a stab at a motion one way or the other. MR. MARINO: I'd like to give a 60-day extension, but the whole thing is is that it's going to fall back on the county's decision as to which way it's going to go. So you can give her 60, 90, 120, but the county's got to step up and make -- come up with a decision what they want to do. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: I agree. We have a motion. And we can add that into the motion as well, that the county be notified that they're on notice of coming up with an answer one way or the other. MR. LEFEBVRE: I don't know if we can compel the county to do something. We can try to compel the respondent to do something. And if the respondent doesn't come through, we can fine them. But how are we going to compel the county and -- are we going to fine them? CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We're not asking the county to do anything. We're only asking the county to answer the question as to when it will be done. MR. LEFEBVRE: Well, you're asking the county to do something, and -- MR. MARINO: Yeah, but she's been trying to do -- she's been trying to get it done also. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Bless you, twice. Knock it off. MS. NICOLA: Thank you. That was just to throw you off. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Would anybody like to second that motion? MR. L'ESPERANCE: I'll second that motion. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. We have a motion and a second. And part of that motion you are requesting that the code enforcement agent contact the county and go over our request to them to give us an answer as to when they will be either hearing this case or Page 11 September 24, 2015 not hearing this case. MR. MARINO: That is part of the motion. MR. L'ESPERANCE: That is part of my second. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. MS. VUKOVIC: Thank you. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. We have a motion and a second. All those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? MR. LEFEBVRE: Opposed. MR. DOINO: Opposed. MR. LAVINSKI: Opposed. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: So we have a -- it passes 4-3. Okay. You have 60 days, and you will contact the county. MS. VUKOVIC: I appreciate it; thanks. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Thank you. MR. HOAGBOON: Thanks. MS. ADAMS: Letter B, stipulations, No. 1, Tab 1, Case CESD20150013679, Lin Lin Wang. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Mr. Short, you want to read your stipulation into the record? MR. SHORT: Sure. For the record, Senior Investigator Eric Short, Collier County Code Enforcement. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent shall, one, pay operational costs in the amount of$65.85 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of this hearing. Two, abate all violations by obtaining all required Collier County Page 12 September 24, 2015 building permits or demolition permit, inspections, and certificate of completion or occupancy within 90 days of this hearing, or a fine of $200 per day will be imposed until the violation is abated. Three, respondent must notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Four, that if the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation using any method to bring the violation into compliance and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this agreement, and all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Any comments from the Board? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: This is a case where you have an abandoned boat on a piece of property -- unimproved property out in the Estates? MR. SHORT: No, that's not correct. MR. LEFEBVRE: Case No. 1. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Oh, Case No. 1. Wow. What tab? MS. ADAMS: Tab 1. MR. LEFEBVRE: Number 1, sorry. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Oh, okay. MR. LEFEBVRE: Unpermitted structural, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC alterations to residential structure. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Got it. Okay. Do you understand the stipulation that you agreed to? MS. WANG: For that he is reading, I do understand that. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. And you think you can get this resolved in 90 days? MS. WANG: I already hired a company who -- and he did do Page 13 September 24, 2015 everything for me. It's July 2015, but I don't know why they take so long. When I received the letter for the hearing, I know they did not submit the permit for me. So for the letter, I agreement, I signed. They saw that, too, so they know they had it done it for me sooner because you guys noticed me for the hearing. So it should be okay. I will make sure they will submit the permit following the agreement I signed. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. MR. LEFEBVRE: You bought this through a foreclosure? MS. WANG: No, regular sale. MR. LEFEBVRE: Regular sale. MS. WANG: Yeah. MR. LEFEBVRE: When did you buy it? MS. WANG: That was two thousand -- either last year or this year. I forgot. 2014. I bought it 2014. Because there's a print I found in the county, the print they have I found at Collier County is not same the one the house I bought. And when I bought the house, I went to the county to asking what they print. They have on the record, so why I need to do. And the person in the county, they tell me, say they don't have a regular print. They only have the two old print. They say you can do whatever you do, and they give me the new print, and then they will be -- said that. So that's why I bought the house. And then when I get home to try -- and go ahead I do -- whatever I do I try to -- I draw all my own print to get that wherever it is. And then someone coming there, they say I don't have right to do that. I had to apply the permit. So I -- it's pretty difficult because they don't have original print in there. So I just paid $5,000 to get a company special -- they provide a permit and get the floor print, and they promised me -- I already paid Page 14 September 24, 2015 the $5,000. They promised me to do that, but I didn't know they did not do that. They did a delay, so I received a hearing. I received a letter from the hearing from you guy, so then -- it's a good thing the county didn't know to them too, so that's the letter. They give it to me. Then I found out -- the company I hired, they give me to letter. They promised me, say they can finish it whenever the letter required. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Did they pull a permit, do you know? MS. WANG: Not yet. This moment, not yet, but they said they can -- they give me the letter, they say I can provide to the county, and they said they promise -- you guy promise me they can finish the -- they can submit the permit on October 2nd, so that's why. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Eric, you've seen the letter? MR. SHORT: Yes. She's retained a design professional. There's been so many alterations to the structure that it's going to have to be a permit by affidavit. And I spoke with the design professional earlier this week. They said by October 2nd they'll have an application submitted. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Anybody want to comment from the Board or any motions? MR. LAVINSKI: I'll make a motion to accept the stipulation as written. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We have a motion. MR. ASHTON: Second. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: And a second. All those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. Page 15 September 24, 2015 MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Carries unanimously. Thank you. MR. SHORT: Thank you. MS. WANG: Thank you. MS. ADAMS: The next stipulation is No. 2, Tab 2, Case CESD20150002903, Diapazon USA, LLC. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Good morning. MR. CURIN: Good morning. MS. PULSE: Good morning. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Good morning. Could you say your name on the mike. I didn't hear it. MR. CURIN: It's William Curin. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay, thank you. And would you like to read the stipulation. MS. PULSE: Good morning. For the record, Investigator Dee Pulse, Collier County Code Enforcement. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent shall, number one, pay operational costs in the amount of$64.59 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of this hearing. Number two, abate all violations by obtaining required Collier County building permits or demolition permit, inspections, and certificate of completion/occupancy within 90 days of this hearing, or a fine of$250 per day will be imposed until the violation is abated. Number three, respondent must notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours abatement of the violation and request the investigator Page 16 September 24, 2015 perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Number four, that if the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation using any method to bring the violation into compliance and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this agreement, and all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Thank you. Could you move the microphone up. MR. CURIN: Surely. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Are you the representative of Diazapon (sic)? MR. CURIN: Correct. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: You're the owner? MR. CURIN: Contractor, the contractor on the -- of Ilya Korchagin's unit. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. And you have the permission of the owner to speak for him? MR. CURIN: Yes. MS. PULSE: Ilya is the owner. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. We don't have a big crowd here today, so it's easy to spot you. Okay, great. Any comments from the Board relative to the -- MR. LAVINSKI: I'd just like to know, obviously you do work in the Naples area. How did this get this far down the road without permits? MR. CURIN: I was just contracted after the fact. All the work was completed prior to me showing up, so nothing was done when I got there. So I brought everything into compliance and resubmitted for a permit. But to obtain the original blueprints of the entire complex was -- it was like trying to find a needle in a haystack. There is nothing much Page 17 September 24, 2015 in records at the county to find. So what I came up with is what Dee came up with. And I've spoken to Thomas Mastroberto and with Thomas Umscheid to make sure that they knew what was occurring, and they told me how to proceed. I've said -- I've done that. The only issue remaining has been taken care of I'm sure we can get the remainder done within the 90 days. MR. LAVINSKI: Who did all this work without a permit. You? MR. CURIN: He did personally. I did not. Ilya did before I showed up. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We're asking the wrong person. Would you like to come up? You'd probably be in a better position to answer the questions and get sworn in, et cetera. (The speaker was duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: And your name, for the record. MR. KORCHAGIN: I am Ilya. Last name Korchagin. I am sorry. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Mr. Lavinski has some questions for you. MR. LAVINSKI: Yeah. I guess my question is, who did all this work? And I assume you're a Naples resident, knowing our laws and ordinances. How did this get this far without permits? MR. KORCHAGIN: Sony, guys. I come in this country only three years ago, and I'm from Russia, Sampi Table in Russia. Sampi Table little bit different rules. If I own anything, I can do inside whatever I want without any permits. It's my fault, I know. I understand situation. We want to resolve the situation with positive result of any conflicts with government, anything, enforcement. And I can say sorry, that's it. But we have what we have. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Any other questions from the Page 18 September 24, 2015 Board? Hearing none, would someone like to make a motion? MR. ASHTON: Make a motion to accept the stipulation as written. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We have a motion. MR. MARINO: Second. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: And a second. All those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Carries unanimously. Okay. You have 90 days. MR. CURIN: Thank you. MR. KORCHAGIN: Thank you. MS. ADAMS: The next stipulation is No. 3, Tab 3, Case CESD20150003476, Diapazon USA, LLC. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: You look familiar. MR. CURIN: Yeah, you've seen me before. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. You want to read this one into the record. MS. PULSE: Yes, sir. For the record, Dee Pulse, Collier County Code Enforcement. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent shall, number Page 19 September 24, 2015 one, pay all operational costs in the amount of$64.59 incurred in the prosecution of this case within 30 days of this hearing. Number two, abate all violations by obtaining all required Collier County building permits or demolition permit, inspections, and certificate of completion/occupancy within 90 days of this hearing, or a fine of$250 per day will be imposed until the violation is abated. Number three, respondent must notify Code Enforcement within 24 hours of abatement of the violation and request the investigator perform a site inspection to confirm compliance. Number four, that if the respondent fails to abate the violation, the county may abate the violation using any method to bring the violation into compliance and may use the assistance of the Collier County Sheriffs Office to enforce the provisions of this agreement, and all costs of abatement shall be assessed to the property owner. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. You're a licensed contractor? MR. CURIN: I am the project manager of the contracting company. I am not the license holder. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. And the person who is going to be installing the hydraulic jack or doing -- it's installed already, I assume? MR. CURIN: It is, and I did have a certified electrician do the wiring for it, and -- but it is going to change the use of the unit. So I'm not sure that I can keep it there. I may have to have it removed. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. MR. CURIN: The issue is the parking. There is a difficulty with the number of businesses that are in that complex and the available parking. And I've spoken to Christine Willoughby about that, and she said that as long as I have that lift in there it changes the use and increases the need for additional parking, which is not available. So unless I can get her to not classify that as an automatic use, I don't see much alternative than to having to remove that jack. Page 20 September 24, 2015 CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Is it your experience that 90 days would be sufficient time to -- MR. CURIN: Remove it? CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: In response -- well, not to remove it but to get a response. MR. CURIN: Oh, yeah, sure. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Questions, comments from the Board? MR. LAVINSKI: This is a separate building or -- MR. CURIN: It is a separate -- it's in the same complex, but it's in a different unit across the parking lot. MR. LAVINSKI: I'll make a motion to approve the stipulation as written. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. We have a motion. Do we -- MR. MARINO: Second. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: And we have a second. Any discussion on the motion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Hearing none, all those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Carries unanimously. Hopefully we won't see you in 90 days. MR. CURIN: I'm assuming not. Thank you. Page 21 September 24, 2015 MS. ADAMS: The next case is number -- from No. 6, old business, A, motion for imposition of fines/liens, No. 1, Tab 7, Case CESD20140018722, Michael Rains and Linda Rains. (The speaker was duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Good morning. MR. LOPEZ-SILVERO: Good morning, sir. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Well, since you're the only one that's here, I suggest that you read to us what you have. MR. LOPEZ-SILVERO: Good morning. For the record, Steven Lopez-Silvero, Collier County Code Enforcement. This is for imposition of fines summary. The violation has been abated by the respondent and, as of today, the previously assessed operational costs of 65.01 have been paid. MR. LEFEBVRE: Have been paid? MR. LOPEZ-SILVERO: Yes, sir, as of this morning. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. And it's still not into compliance? MR. LOPEZ-SILVERO: It is, sir. The violation's been abated. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: It has been abated. Okay. MR. LOPEZ-SILVERO: Yes. The structure's been removed, and the required permits have been obtained. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. Any comments from the Board? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Any motions from the Board? MR. LAVINSKI: The respondent, did they tell you they wouldn't be here today to see which way this went? MR. LOPEZ-SILVERO: The respondent's currently ill. He's unable to leave his home. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Ordinarily, when we have this type of imposition, you would expect the respondent to request an Page 22 September 24, 2015 abatement or reduction in fine or whatnot. And since they have abated the situation and they have paid their operational costs, the Board generally looks at that in a favorable light. This has happened in the past where the respondent has not been here. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Make a motion to abate. MR. LAVINSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We have a motion and a second to abate. Any discussion on the motion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Hearing none, all those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Carries unanimously. Thank you. MR. LOPEZ-SILVERO: Thank you. Have a great day. MS. ADAMS: The next item is No. 8, consent agenda. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Okay. You need a vote to -- okay. We need a motion to request to forward the cases to the county attorney. MR. L'ESPERANCE: So moved. MR. LAVINSKI: Second. MR. LEFEBVRE: Second. Page 23 September 24, 2015 CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We have a motion and a second. All those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Carries unanimously. Okay. Normally at this time I'd turn to Jeff and say, do you have anything to report, but Jeff is now onto bigger and better things. MR. LAVINSKI: Yeah. Just when we got him trained, he left. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Yeah. Okay. Well, I think that does it for today. I missed by eight minutes. I thought we'd be out of here by 9:30, and it's 9:38. MR. LAVINSKI: Motion to adjourn. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We have a motion to adjourn. MR. ASHTON: Second. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: All those in favor? MR. MARINO: Aye. MR. DOINO: Aye. MR. LEFEBVRE: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: Aye. MR. LAVINSKI: Aye. MR. L'ESPERANCE: Aye. MR. ASHTON: Aye. CHAIRMAN KAUFMAN: We are adjourned. Page 24 September 24, 2015 ***** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 9:38 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY NFORCEMENT BOARD • :ER A N, CHAIRMAN V These minutes approved by the Board on ■;'-> ZZ- S , as presented ✓ or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC., BY TERRI LEWIS, NOTARY PUBLIC/COURT REPORTER. Page 25