The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 11/10/1998 RREGULAR E T THE BCC NOVEMBER 10, 1998 gapLes DaiLy Heys Naptes, H. ~O OF C~ C~SSZ~ERS A~: ~ZA~A SIRLEAF REFER~CE: ~1~ 5~6~S2 ~TZCE OF PUBLZC ~EE C~ty of Cott~er ~fore the ~rl~ aut~r~ty, ~r~ B. ~, ~ ~ ~th says t~t she serves t~ ~J~t~t ~r~rate Secretary of the NapLes CotLqer C~ty, FLorida: that the ~ of ~.ertJti~ vas ~bLtsh~ in ~s~r ~ dates LJ~t~. Affect further ~s t~t the satd ~p~es DaiLy ~a ~ a ~r ~Lts~ at ~pLes, tn CoLLier C~ty~ FLort~, ~ :~t the ~r ~ heretofore ~en ~t~n~Ly ~LJ~ Jn ~Jd CoLLier ~ty, FLorida, each ~ ~ ~ mter~ as ~e~ cLass ~tL ~tter at t~ ~t off,ce Jn ~Les~ ~n ~ttter C~ty~ FLorJ~ for a ~r~ of q yesr ~ pr~t~ t~ f~rst ~t4~t~ of the atta~ ~ of ~ertts~t; ~ affiant furt~r ~ t~t ~e ~a neither ~d p~ ~ ~r~, fire or c~rati~ any dJ~t, r~te, ~issJ~ or refu~ for the ~e of ~ecurJ~ th~s ~ertts~t for ~Ll~tJ~ tn the ~td n~s~r. P~LZSHED ~: 11/~ SPACE: 53.~ INCH S~ture o Afftant ParsLey ~ ~ ~ '~- _ November 10, 1998 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION.S AGENDA Tuesday, November 10, 1998 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST ILEGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGIS'rS WI77! THE COUNTY AI~M]2NTSTRATOR PRIOR TO 'iT{E PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM 'l~) BE ADDRESSED. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON ?7lIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMI'I'I'~ 1~{ WRITING WITH F~fPLANATION TO T]fE COUlFI~ AI3M//q-iSTRATOR AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO ~iT[E DATE OF 97{E MEI~PING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF TI{E PROC,:.~JIlgGS PERTAINING TI~.w~I~), AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF TI{E PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WqIICI! RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH 77[E APPEAL IS TO BE ;kT.L REGIS'r~ PUBLIC SPEA~k~{S WILL BE LIMITED TO FIYE (5) MINLViq~S UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY T]~ CHAIRMAN. ASSIS'r~D LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE ]{F2%RING I~[PAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONerS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION - Reverend Jay Kowalski, First United Methodist Church 2. pT,~nGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Approved and/or Adopted with changes 4/0 (Commissioner Constantine out ) A. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA B. APPROVAL OF SUMY~RY AGENDA Vote on Item {17B 4/0 (Co-~.{ssioner Constantine voted on this item only and Co--,,[ssioner }{ancock abstained) C. APPROVAL OF REGULAR AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF Approved as presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Constantine Out) A. October 20, 1998 - Regular meetinG. PaGe 1 November 10, 1998 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND SERVICE AWARDS A. PROCI~%MATI ONS 1) Proclamation proclaiming November 22-29,1998 as Traditional Family Values Week. To be accepted by the Reverend Jane Wallace, President Greater Naples Ministerial ' 1 Association and Reverend David Mallory, President Evangellca Ministerial Association. Adopted- 5/0 2) Proclamation proclaiming the week of November 8-14, 1998 as Youth Appreciation Week in Collier County. To be accepted by Mr. Gerald Neff, Secretary, Naples Sunset Optimist Club. Adopted- 5/0 B. SERViCE AWARDS C. PRESENTATIONS Presentation of plaque of appreciation to Commissioner IIancock by Chairln~n Berry° 6. APPRO%rAL OF CLERK'S REPORT A. ANALYSIS OF ~ES TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCIES. 7. PUBLIC PETITIONS !~.~! 8. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT t~ A. COM)gJNITY DE%~ELOf94ENT & ENVIRONM]KNTAL SERViCES B. PUBLIC W~)P~KS 1) Approve an Amendment to the original Developer contribution ~. Agreement with Long Bay Partners for construction of ~ Livingston Road North of Immokalee Road, including Board approval for staff to prepare and execute a Supplemental ? Agreement with Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. for Roadway Design Revisions Staff reco-~mendation Approved w/changes - 5/0 ~ded 2) Introduction of Jeff Bibby, Public Works Director C. PUBLIC SERViCES 1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners '~' authorize a contract amendment for design services for the new ~ Domestic Animal Services facility Page 2 Nov~-her 10, ]_998 Option #2, as outlined in the Executive Summary - Approved 5/0 D.SUPPORT S EIU~rl CES E.CO{RFI~ MANAGER 1) Proposal to begin scheduling regular Board of County Commissioner Meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month beginning in January 1999 Approved - 5 / 0 2) Letter to Sheriff identifying changes to the FY 99 budget request. (County Administrator) Approval to transmit letter - 5/0 F. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 9. COUNTY Aq'~ORNEY'S REPORT 10. BOARD OF COUNTY CO~M~SSION~{S A) Report regarding the status of the Lely guardhouse controversy. (Commissioner Hancock) Agre~m~nt approved w/changes -4/1 (Commissioner Mac'Kie opposed) B) Report regarding North Naples Masterplan Staff to initiate a Town Hall approach 5/0 11. O-r~i~ I'r~MS A. ~ CONSTITUTIONAL OFFIceS B. PUBLIC COMMENT ON GE~%I, TOPICS David Shealy regarding scenic highway booklet PUBLIC I{F2%RINGS WILL BE HEARD IM~-,}IA'I'~.bY FOLLOWING STAFF 12. ADV~.~TISED PUBLIC ~INGS - BCC A. CO~FKEHENS/VE PLAN ~S B. ZON]_~G ~S 1) Petition PUD-98-11, Mr. Robert Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes and Associates, Inc., representing Steve Houston, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agriculture to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Tamiami Professional Center PUD for property located on the east side of Tamiami Trail North (US 41) on the south 200 feet of Section 15, Township 48 Page 3 November 10, 1998 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida Ordinance 98-90 - Adopted with changes 5/0 2) Petition PUD-98-14, George L. Varnadoe, of Young, Van Assenderp & Varnadoe, P.A., representing Granada Siloppes Associates LTD., requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agriculture to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Granada Shoppes PUD for mixed use commercial development consisting of a maximum 390,000 square feet of gross floor area inclusive of retail, office and service land uses for property located at the southeastern quadrant of the intersection of U.S. 41 and Immokalee Road (C.R. ~46) in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 39.2~ ~cres. Ordinance 98-91 - Adopted with changes 5/0 C. OT~a 13. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. ADIrKRTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) Petition SV-98-2, William D. Keith, Esq. Representing John P. Cardillo and Daniel R~ Monaco requesting 15 foot variance from the required setback of 15 feet established (or signs to 0 feet along Tamiami Trail East and a 5 foot variance from the required setback of 15 feet establishe,~ for signs to 10 feet along Osceola Avenu~ for a pole sign f~>r an existing law firm located at ~550 East Tamiami Trail in Section 15, Township 50 South, Rankle 25 East, C©l] ier County, Florida. Resolution 98-463 - Adopted 5/0 Withdrawn 2) Petition A-98-5, Kim Patrick Kobza, o~ Treiser, Kobza & Volpe, P.A., representing the Southpo~nte Yacht Club at Windstar ~4arina, and Glenn Oakes, Lee Flandrea~] and Jack Fink, requesting an appeal of a determination of insubstantial change to the Southpointe Yacht Club Master Plan, adopted by ordinance 88-R2, as amended, rendered by the Planning Services D~rector pursuant ~o the Dro'/isions set forth in Section 2.7.?.5.2 of the Collker County Land Development Code. 3) Petition V-98-18, C. Dean Smith of Q. Grady ~4inor representing Victoria Lakes Condominium Associates, requesting a 23 foot variance from the required 30 foot front yard to 7 feet along Berkshire Street and Nottingham Drive for carports for a property located in North ~:aples, approximately one mile south of Immokalee Road on the west side of Airport Road, in Section 20, To',~ship 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Page 4 November 10, 1998 Resolution 98-464 - Adopted 4/0 (Con~nissioner Mac'Kie out) 4) Petition A-98-4, Wendell R. & Diane L. Keene, requesting an appeal of the Collier County Planning Commission's approval of Petition BD-98-26 on August 20, 199g, for property located at 400 Willett Avenue, further described a~: Lot 10, Block :4. Connors Vanderbilt Beach, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Appeal Denied - 4/0 (Commissioner Mac'Kie out) 5) 771IS I'1'~ }MS B~N CONTIN~ TO Nf3Vq~MBER 24{ 1998, Petition V-98-19, Jay Malamphy, representing Gulf Coast Development Group, L.C. requesting approval to increase the maximum permitted floor area ratio of .45 to .66 to construct a building with a maximum of 225,291 square feet ~or an Independent Care Living Facility nnd A~;si~;te¢] Care Living Facility for property located to the south of Van¢terbilt Beach Road Extension, north of Arbor Boulevard, and west of Vineyartb~ Boulevard, further described as Tract Vineyards Unit 3, in Section 5, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. 6) ~{IS l'r~ }MS Bz~N CONTINq3~ TO N~ER 24~ 1998, Petition V-98-8, Bill Hoover of Hoover Planning, representing Roger D. Withers and 0PM-USA-Inc., requesting approval of a 65 foot height variance from the required 185 feet to 250 feet for an existing 180 foot comm~un]cations tower located at 5630 Taylor Road, within the .~ & C Industrial Park, in Section ]l, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. B. 14. STAPqF'S COMMUNICATIONS 15. BOARD OF CO~ COMMISSIONERS' COMMUNICATIONS 16. CONSF~gT AGI{NDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one mot[on without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed form the Consent Agenda and considered scgDarately. Approved and/or Adopted - 4/0 with changes (Commissioner Constantine out) Item ~17B was a 4/0 vote with Commissioner Constantine voting and Co~issioner }~ncock abstaining) A. C(~MUNI~ DLm~zbOPMI~NT & Elh~;IR~AL SERVICES 1) ~{IS IT~4 I~S B~N DEL~I'~]3 2) Recommendation to approve the attached Satisfaction of Lien Pa~e 5 November 10, 1998 for Public Nuisance Resolution 98-254 3) Lien Resolutions-Code Enforcement Case Nos. 80605-027 Claude E LaRue; 80608-063 Boris & Emogene Pukay; 80610-059 Thales Delorenzi & Patricia Campelo; 80708-124 Philip Pierre; 80709-064 Edward J & Laverda Pelc Res. 98-443 through 98-447 4) Lien Resolutions-Code Enforcement Case Nos. 80413-061 Valentin & Migdalia Gonzalez; 80413-064 Shang Mei Huang; 80413-064 John Pagliaro TR Res. 98-448 through 98-450 5) Lien Resolutions-Code Enforcement Case Nos. 60522-087 Gary L & Nancy C. Seward; 80514-028 Lloyd G Sheehan; 80622-009 Connie Simon & Marlo Pikul Res. 98-451 through 98-453 6) Lien Resolutions-Code Enforcement Case Nos. 80224-019 Ralph & Graciela Terry; 80226-050 James R Colosimo TR C/O Naples Realty Services Inc.; 80302-052 Ivan Magana; 80316-040 Rodney Bushnell; 80323-161 Esteban Tamayo Res. 98-454 through 98-458 B. PUBLIC WORKS 1) Approve Work Order CDM-FT-98-12 for related engineering and organizational services related to optimization operation and maintenance practices at the North and South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plants. In the amount of $85,100.00 2) Approve a Road Impact Fee Credit in the amount of $2,802.74 for the former Chamber of Commerce Building on U.S. 41 in the City of Naples. Continued to 11/24/98 31 THIS I'~'F~ }~S BzKN DELETED 4) Approve Bid#98-2872 and Bid#98-2873 for the purchase of three crew cab flatbed dump trucks and three, five cubic yard dump trucks in the amount of $243,198.00. To Wallace International, Inc. 5) Approve a Developer Contribution Agreement with Ocean Boulevard Partnership and Ocean Boulevard Partnership II ("Developer") for the contribution of land to the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT') for right-of-way necessitated by the widening of U.S. Highway 41. 6) Approve a Developer Contribution Agreement with Collier Page 6 November 10, 1998 Development Corporation ("Developer") for the contribution of land to the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") for a water management detention area necessitated by the widening of U.S. Highway 41. 7) Approve a Developer Contribution Agreement with Ocean Boulevard Partnership South, LTD. ("Developer") for the contribution of land to the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") for right-of-way and drainage necessitated by the widening of U.S. Highway 41. C. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Approval of a Concession Agreement amendment between the Association of Unit Owners of the Registry Hotel at Pelican Bay, Inc., (The Registry) and Collier County to provide an expansion of the deck and improvement of the kitchen facilities at the Clam Pass Beach Park. D. SUPPORT SERVICES 1) This Item Deleted 2) Approval of Budget Amendment to Complete the PC Modernization Project 3) Unanticipated Expenditures Relating to a Water Break In the amount of $16,175.00 E. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Budget Amendment Report 99-025 & 99-030 F. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION]~/{S G. M~SCEnT m/qEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WIT}{ ACTION AS DIREC'r~3. H. OTRKR CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS I. COUNTY ATTORNEY J. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVW~/TISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST ~w.~r THE FOLLOWING CRIT~_~IA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY T~E COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR 0TRk~ AUTHORIZING Page 7 November 10, 1998 AGENCIES OF ~.~. MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRI'I-I'~.N OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE 1T~M RECEI~u BY STAFF, TI{E COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC M~<~TING ON WHICH ~{E ITWZ4S ARE SC~K~YLED TO BE I{FJkRD; AND 4) NO INDMDUALS ARE REGISTF_~r) TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE I'r~. A) Petition V-98-14, Mark & Ann Hunter, requesting an After-the-Fact Variance of 6.9 feet from the required side yard setback of 30 feet to 23.1 feet for property located at 21210akes Boulevard, further described as the south half of Tract 13, Golden Gate Estates Unit 97, in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Res. 98-459 B) Petition PUD-98-10, Mr. Robert Duane, AICP, of Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. representing Jim Colosimo, Trustee, requesting a rezone from "E" Estates to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Cambridge Square PUD for property located on the north side of Pine Ridge (C.R. 896), approximately 300 feet east of Livingston Road in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida Ord. 98-89 - Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Constantine voted and Cormn{ssioner Hancock abstained) C) Petition V-98-15, R. Bruce Anderson, representing Ronald L. Glass, President of RSG Family Limited Partnership- Immokalee, requesting a 30 foot After-the-Fact Variance from the required 30 foot front yard to 0 feet along the Northern front yard, an 11 foot After-the-Fact Variance from the required 30 foot front yard to 19 feet along the eastern front yard and a 10 foot After-the-Fact Variance from the required 30 foot front yard to 20 feet along the southern front yard of an existing apartment complex in Immokalee. Res. 98-460 D) Petition VAC-98-019 to disclaim, renounce and vacate the public's interest in a 5.5' by 45' portion of right of way on Delaware Avenue, located in Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Immokalee, Florida. Res. 98-461 withdrawn E) Petition AV-97-031 to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the public's interest in a 60' wide road right of way shown as "Pelton Avenue" on the plat of "Burdale" as recorded in Plate Book 4, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida and being located in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East. Page 8 November 10, 1998 F) Petition AV 98-016 to vacated a 12' wide drainage easement between lots 31 and 32, Block B, according to the Plat of "Collier's Reserve", as recorded in Plat Book, 20, Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier County, Florida and to accept a 12' wide drainage easement as a replacement easement. Res. 98-462 18. ADJOURN INQuJ_KIES C'ONc~ C~%NGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO '£n~ COUNTY AI~crNIs~TOR'S OFFICE AT 774-8383. Page 9 BOARD OF COU'NTY COMT~7.gvlONERS' MEETIN(~ IVOVEMBER JO. 1998 ADD: ITEM 8 (E){2} - LETTER TO SHERIFF IDENTIFYING CHANGES TO THE FY 99 BUDGET REQUF~T. (COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR). WITHDRAW: ITEM 15(A~(2~ - PETITION A-98-$ SOUTHPOINTE YACHT CLUB AT WINDSTAR MARINA - APPEAL OF A DETERMINATION OF INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE SOUTItPOINTE YACHT CLUB PUD MASTER PLAN, (PETITIONER'S REQUEST). WITttDRAW.. ITEM 17(E) - PETITION AV 97-031 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A 60' WIDE .ROAD RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN AS "PELTON AVENUE" ON THE PLAT OF "BURDALE" AS RECORDED. (STAFF'S REQUEST). NOTE: fi'EM 16(C )(I) - THE ATTACHMENT FOR THIS AGREEMENT WAS INADVERTENTLY OMITTED FROM THE AGENDA PACKAGE. A COPY OF THE OMITTED PAGE HAS BEEN PROVIDED. to celebrate National t:omi~ 14leek, the Greater NapJe~ A4ini.~'erial Association in fellowship with the Collier County E~angdical A4in/steria/ A~ociation propo$~ a cel~b~ion of No~emb~ ~-~9, 1998 to be known ~ Fraditio~/ ~amily Va/u~ ~te~' and the home i$ the cornerstone and foundation of our ~tion becomt a thr~tentd i~fftution. ~erefore, we ~ that r~sidents of ~o//ier ~oun~ ~rt/ci~te in the fo/Iow/~ family actiw'ti~: Sunday a Fam/~ 5A2 the vast majority of youth are concerned, knowledgeable and responsible citizens; and the accomp/ishments and achievements o£ the~e you~ citizen~ de~erve the recognition and prai~e of their e/dec~; and Optimist !nternations/ has. since 1954, alert/aped and promoted a program entitled Youth Appreciation Weet¢' and WHEI~EA$, the citizens o ~ indicated a de.ire to join the Sunset ~ and approval o£ the NOW ,£ 1998 be COA4A4P$$1ON£,q$ COld. fEb COON?3I, pLObIoA SE' b WXGHI'E BI~OCK, C~EI~K 241E ]7'OR: 2494 ?O: 1704 ¢l, lltl YO ?11 IOA~ ml¢0~l~ in t~ O{flCI~l. tlCO~$ 0! CO~II! ~Jl?~, f~ COHI! tiYIlOfflCl IT! fl, O01 12/22/ll It t2=IS~1 IIIGIY I. I10~1, Ct,Ill lille I,II ,z, 72. I: 8 B 1 AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVEI.OPER CONTRIi UTtON ^GREEME T TillS AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVEI.OPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT is made and entered into the ,,.'t;e~- day of~'-~. ~_, 1998. by and between Long Bay Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 3451 Bonita Bay Boulevard. Si, itc 202, Bonita Springs. FL 34134 ("LBP"), and Collier County. Florida. a political subdivision of thc State of Florida. whose addrcss is 33{')I East Tamiami Trail, Naplcs. FL 34112 CCounly"), WtIEREAS. thc Livingston Road cxtcnsion from [mmokalcc Road (C.R. 846) to thc [,cc Counly linc and connecting to a Lee County scgmcnt that contim~cs Io Bonita Bcach Road (hereinafter "Livingston Road") has been an integral par1 of Collier County's transportalion plans for many years; and WllEREAS. thc County has acquired substantial portions of road right-of-way along the Livingston Road corridor and is in the process of obtaining lhe remaining road right-of-way; and WttEREAS, Livingston Road is the only north-south arterial between U.S. 41 and 1-75 that thc County plans 1o extend north lo thc Lee County line, with no plans currently in cxi~lcncc to extend either Goodlcttc-Frank Road or Airport-Pulling Road north to Bonita Bcach Road: and WHEREAS, traffic projections indicate that l.ivingston Road north of hnmokalcc will provide relief to traffic congestion on U,S. 41 and on 1-75 and will bcncfil all property owners within Road hnpact Fcc District I; and WIIEREAS. Livingston Road will provide improved accessibility for Collicr County residents [o thc Southwest Florida hltcmational Airport and [:lorida Gulf Coast University: and WIIEREAS. LBP purchased thc property described in Exhibit "A" (Iht I'ropcrty). attached hereto and incorporated hcrcin; and WHEREAS. l. BP's Property is Iocalcd north of lmmokalce Rmid west of and adjoining the Livingston Road corridor; and WHEREAS, thc County and i.BP bavc determined that thc prcfcrublc access to I.BP's Property is from thc north/soulh Livingslon [toad corridor: and WIIEREAS, LBP was willing to jointly participalc with thc County to accomplish thc timely construction of Livingston Road in accordancc with thc Icrrns and conditions of this Amcndcd and Rcstaled Developer Contribution Agreement; and WHEREAS, LBP and County enlcred into a Developer Contribution Agrccmcnl on February 17, 1998, which is recorded in Official Records Book 2400, Page 20, ct. scq,, Official Records of Collier County, Florida ("Developer Contribution Agreement") for the construction of Livingston Road from lmmokalcc Road to thc Lee County linc (hereinafter "Livingston Road"); and WHEREAS, such Developer Contribution Agreement to construct Livingston Road was and is in thc best intcrcsts of. and is a substantial benefit to. thc gcncral public; and OR: 2494 PG: 1705 '8B1 WIIEREAS. such a Dcvctopcr Contribution Agrccmcnt provides a benefit to thc County and LBP by allowing thc construction of thc preferable acccss to LBP's Property in a timely manner; and WItEREAS, thc Collier County Road Impact Fcc Ordinance currcnlly in effect, Ordinance 92-22, as amended, provides a mcchanism for impact fcc crcdils Io bc granted Io a LBP in exchange for construction of portions of thc County's road network; and WHEREAS, both parties to this Amended and Restated Developer Contribution Agreement acknowledge Road Impacl fee Credits shall be a credit only against Road Impact fees, and that such credits shall not offset, diminish or reduce any other charges, fees or other impact fccs for which LBP is responsible in connection with thc development of the Propcrty; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan is in conformity wilh contemplated improvements and addilions to t}lc transportation network; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan, viewed in conjunction with other existing or proposed plans. '.viii not advcrscly impact thc cash flow or liquidity of any Road Impact Fcc Trust Account in such a way as to frustrate or interfere with other planned or ongoing growth necessitated capital improvements and additions to Ibc transportation network; and WI II}RF. AS, such proposed plan, viewed in conjunclion with other cxisling or proposed phms. will not create a detrimental imbalance between Ibc arlcrial and collector roadways; anti WI IERI';AS. Ibc proposed plall is consiStelll will} Ibc public interest; and WIIEREAS, under the Developer Contribution Agreement. Livingston Road wa~ conlemplalcd to bc constructed as a rural cross-section; and WIIEREAS. LBP and thc County ]lave reevaluated thc type of cross-section for l,ivingslon Road and have agreed that l.ivingslon Road shotdd now bc constructed as ail urban cross-scclion: and WIIEREAS, LBP anti Counly acknowledge that tim actual cosl of constructing an tlrban cross section will cxcccd Ibc cost tn cons[ruer a rural cross section: ;Itld WI]EREAS, thc estimated cost of construcling an urban cross-section is $4.897.118.00 and the estimated cost orconsirucfing a rural cross-section is $4,183,3f)(LO0; anti WItERF. AS, [.lip and Cotlllly agree Ihat lhe total amotmt of road impact fcc credits LBP shall receive for constructing an urban cross-section shall not exceed tile tolal amount of road impact fees credits it could receive for thc construction ora rural cross-scclion as provided in file Developer Conlribulion Agreement unless tile County is able to rcducc thc ammmt or right-or, way il will acqulrc, thus rcducing thc Counly's financial cxpcndilure For right-of-way; and OR: 2494 PG: 1706 ' 8B1 WHEREAS, to limit thc amount or impact rcc credits LBP can rcccive for constructing an urban cross*scction, LBP has a~rccd to limit thc cc~i~cd csdmalc orconstmction costs rot an urban cross-section xo thc ccrlificd estimate orconstmction costs for a rural cross-scction; anti WIIEREAS, thc panics havc agrccd Io nmcnd and restate fl~c Dcvclopcr Comributi.. Agrccmcnl Io rcflccl that l.ivin~ston Road will bc conslructcd as an urban cross-section; WIIEREAS, hoth panics IO ii,is Amcndcd ~nd Rcslacd Developer Conlribuli()n Agrccmcnt acknowlcd~c dml thc Failurc o~ this Agreement to addrcss any pcrmil, condilion, term or restriction shall not relieve cilhcr party, or Ihcir successors, of thc ncccssily or complying wilh a.y law, ordinance, rule or regulation govcmhlg said pcmdlfing rcquircmcnls, conditim~s, Icrms or rcstricfions; and WtlEREAS, both pa~ cs oh's A t~c ~ded and Rcstalcd Dcvclopcr Conlribulion Asrccmcnt acknowlcdgc that Ibis Agrccmcnt is not lo bc constmcd as a dcvclnpmcnt agrccmcnl undcr lhc Florida l.ocal Govcmmcnl Dcvclopcr Agrccmcnl Acl; and WIII~KEAS, thc I.cc Couoly Board of Counly Commissioners has approved n I{csolution to amend ils Capital Improvcmcnl Program (CIP) to a) provide For linc acquisition of approximately onc mile of right-o&way between Bonita Beach Road and Ihe l.cdCollicr linc; b) provldc rot ibc dosign o~lhc road; and c) lime Ibc acquis lion and dcsisn such lhat thc conslruclion orlhc roaJway will cmm~cncc hy January I, 20OI. WITNESSFTIt NOW, 'H II~I{I~I:OI{IL i. consideration offl'cn D()llars (SIO.O0)and other ~oo(1 and valuable co.sidcration cxchan~cd bc~wccn thc panics, thc rcccipt and sul'ficicncy ~){' which is mutually acknowledged, a~*l in considcralion ortho covcnants conlah~cd herein, thc panics agree as Follows: I, Thc above rccilals arc Iruc and co.cci, and arc hcrcwifl~ inco~oraicd as a pa~ of lifts A~rccmc~lt. [)hast I ofthc project is dcfincd Io bc thc lcn~lh al' [.ivin~slon I{oa(] From [mmokalcc Road ~o thc proposcd access point al I.BP's Propcay, said road corridor more spccillcally sl~own Amcndcd Exhibit 'B", altachcd hcrcto and inco~oratcd hcrcln. 2. Thc County shall condnuc with ils acquisition by gi~, purchasc or cmincni domain, at thc carlicst possiblc datc, of all ncccssa~ righ[-of-wuy for road pu~oscs within thc Livingston Road comdor no~h oflmmokalcc Road to thc Collier Cot ~ty/Lcc County bounda~. Thc County shall bc solcly rcsponsiblc for thc paymcn[ of all costs and cxpcnscs associatcd with such propcay acquisition. 3. Othcr than thc cn~inccring cosls to be paid by LBP pursuant to this Ag('ccmcnt, thc County shall be solcly rcsponsiblc for thc paymcnt o fall costs anti for all applications in prcpamfion OR: 2494 PG: 1707 881 associatcd v,'ith Construction Plans and road righl-of-v,'ay pcrmitting, including complction of all environmental pcrolits and environmental mitigatiou requirements (land acquisitions, dedications. or monetary contributions) by any applicablejurisdictional authority. Thc County's commitment shall includc thc cost of any cnvJronmcntal or species survcys rcquircd by any jurisdictional authority. 4. Thc County acknowlcdgcs that thc timely complction of thc road right-of-way acquisitiou, together with the necessary construction plans and pcmlitting, is a critical and fundamental aspect of this Developer Contribution ^grccmcnt. Therefore, tile County shall acquire thc road right-of-way (including completing eminent donmin "quick-take" procedures) and finalize thc construction phms and pcmlitting, including completion of all mitigation requirements, on or before I)cccmbcr 31. 1999. 5. Upon completion of the Phase I road construction by I.BP and acceptance by thc Counly itl accordance with thc rcquircmcms of the Collicr County Land Dcvclopnlcnt ('cdc, tile County shall bc responsible for maintenance of the Phase I road construction. 6. Thc County shall engage the services of a qualilied Consmiction Engineering ami Inspection (CEI) COllStlhalu to oversee all phases o~the construction Itl TlC undertaken hy I.t½P as sc[ forth below. LBl~_Cummitmcnt~: l'hlac 1 7. Within twelve (I 2) months after tile County's acquisition of all necessary right-of- way property rights, plus completion of:all necessary plans and permits, LBP shall bc responsible for comnlcncenlcnt or coilstruclion cfa two-lane; undivided road v, ith an urban cross-section between and tile proposed entrance to [.liP's Property {"Phase I road coustruction"). LBP agrees to indemnify and hold thc County harmless from all acts, errors nnd omissions of its agents, contraclors, subcontractors, and pcrsonncl with respect to any requirement of any permit that has beeu issued in tile name of Collier County. A general description of the Phase I Road Construe[icc is set forth itl Amended Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. Thc construction of Livingston Road by LBP shall 'tlc in accordance with tile construction plans, specifications, and permits approved by tile County. Subject to lhe provisions within Paragraph 14 and 23. LBP has agreed to limit Ibc cost of the road construction, including fill Io tile estimated amount of $3,499,470.00 pursuant to thc certified estimate of thc cost or construe[ica as described in Amended Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein. LBP shall pay one-half of the engineering fees above and beyond tile executed Supplemental Agreement No. 7 between County and Itolc Montes and Associates, Inc. to modify the existing construction plans to an urban cross-section from a rural cross-section. LBP's portion of thc engineering fees are estimated to be $197,500.00. In order to expedite lhe construction of Livingston Road LBP shall have the option, bul not lhe obligation, to begin earth work, clearing, grubbing, and filling activities, subject to permit conditions at tile time the Counly acquires the necessary right-of-way properly rig}ils on which these activities will occur. 8. Upon conmlencement of the Phase l road construction. I. BP shall convey to Collier County road right-of-way for tile north/south Livingston Road corridor via easement or warranty deed in accordance with existing commitments in Planned Unit Development documents applicable 4 IIIIIIII1" IIIII IIII IIIII IIII II OR: 2494 PG: 170 3 [3 1 ' to LBP's Property. The estimated cost of such noah/south right-of-xvay dedication to project cntraocc is $353,400.00. subject to a County.approved real estate Appraisal.- The credit shall bc based on thc appraiser's detem~ination of fair market value. Itl addition, LBP shall accept convcyar~cc, trcatrncnl and attcnnation of the stormv/atcr from tile above mentioned norlh/soutb right-of-way adjacent to tile Properly. Tbc estimated cost of this stom~water attenuation is 5,340.000.00. 9. Thc value of LBP's contributions for Phase I of thc project arc an estimated total of $3.852,870.00. In addition, LBP shall reimburse thc County for all costs for the CEI consultant previously mentioned. Tbe expenses incurred by LBP pertaining to thc CEI consultant shall bc considered a project cost and LBP shall receive road impact fcc credits ~ set forth in this Agrccmcm for such expenses. In addition. LBP shall receive road impact fcc credits for survcying and cnginccring costs incurred by LBP to construct Ibc Phase I road construction upon submission of thc actual construction costs ccrtiticd by an coginccr or architect. Cmml:,' Corn mi[recurs' '.JSLta~c21 Phase 11 of thc Livingston Road project is defined to be tile length of Livingston Road from thc proposed acccss point at LBP's Property to thc Lcc County line. said road corridor more particularly shov.'n on Amcndcd Exhibi! "B", attached hcrcto and incorporated herein. I 0. Thc County's commitmcnts for Phase II of thc Livingston Road consign, lc[ion shall tlc idcnlical to thc County Phase I commitments including the cost o f right-of-way acquisition, costs and applicatioos for construction phms and pcrulitting, including tile costs of mitigation and shall bc completed by December 31. 2000. Upon completion of thc Phase I1 road construction and acceptance by the Couoty, thc County shall be responsible for maintenance of tile Phasc II road construction. LBP C o m m it men Lszl?_b2&c,21 I 1, a. Commitments for improvements: Not later than December 31,2001, and after the County obtains all County commim3cnts for Phase I1, LBP shall commcncc construction of Livingston Road as a two-lane, undivided road from [,tiP's Property cntrancc to tile Lee County linc CPhase Il road construction"). Subject to the provisions within Paragraph 14 and 23, LBP has agreed to limit the total estimated cost of the Phase II construction to approximately $683,830.00, including roadway fill and, roadway construction. A general description of thc Phase II mad construction is set forlh in Amended Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein. The certified estimate of thc Phase Il road construction costs is attached hcreto as Amended Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein. LBP shall also reimburse the County for all costs of the CEI consultant mca[toned above. LBP shall receive road impact fee credits for costs and expenses it incurs for the CEI consultant, engineering and surveying relating to Phasc II road construction upon submission of thc actual construction costs certificd by all engineer or architect. 5 b. ColllnlilllletltS for rigilt-O£-v,,ay: Upon COllllllCllCClllCllt el' tile Phase II road construction, LBP shall con,,'ey lo Collier County road right-ol'-v,'ay Ibc Ibc norlh/south LivJllgston Road corridor via casement or warranty dccd ill accordance v,'ith existing conlnlitnlents in PJanlled Unit Development documents applicable to LBP's Property. The cstimalcd cost of such north/south right-of- v,'ay dedication to LBP's project entrance is 5251.600, subject lo a County- approved real estate Appraisal. The credit shall bc based oil the appraiser's determination o1' fiiir market value. impact ILcc_Cr_cdits: Phase 1 12. In exchange for LBP's road construction and land dedication costs iii thc amount o1' approximately S3,852,870 related lo Phase l of Livingston Road. ii regional transporlation Iilcility, LBP shall bc cnlitlcd to the following: l~pon completion et'thc Phnsc I road construction and submission of actual certified costs ol'constnlclion. [.BP shall receive a mad impact fee credit ~ith a value o1'S1.500, I 14 ("Phase 1 [,load Impact Fcc Credit'). The Phase I Road Impact Fcc Credit shall bc treated as a prepayment of road impact t'ccs for 646 single-family units (current road impact fcc of51379 per unit) and 640 muhi- I'arniiy units ( 1-2 stories) (current road impact I've ofS952 per unit) for the limited purpose ol".'csting lhcsc units for transporlation concurrency. Such vesting shall he evidenced by the issuance of a Ccrlificalc of Public Facilities Adequacy (for Transporlalion Facilities) al thc time such Phase I Road Impact J:cc Credits arc granted. LBP shall pay any increase in Ibc Collier Coumy road impact Itc which may occur subsequent lo the date o£this Agrccmcm at Ibc time it obtains a building pcrolil. By way ofcxmnplc, iii thc event tile road impact fcc for a sitlgl¢-Ikunily unit is 51 ,$00.00 at die time a buikting permit is obtained. LBP shall cilbcr pay the County 5121 IS 1,500 -51,379 = $121 ) or shall apply additiolml road impact Fcc credits as paytllcnt Ibc such amount. Thc total trails to bc constructed on thc Property shall be detemlioed in accordance with current and/or future zoning approvals by Collier Coonty provided, however, that I. BP shall bc entitled to tile totaI Phase I Road hnpact Fcc Credit (SI,500.114) scl forlh above. Future road impact ice credits iii the estimated amount of 52.352,756 ("Phase I Future Road hnpact }:cc Credits") which can be utilized by LBP and/or its assigns only upon tile completion of Livingston Road to Bonita Beach Road in Lee County provided tile total actual credit is consistent with paragraph 23 et'this Agreement and further provided that Ibc dccd or casement described in paragraph 8 has been recorded in tile public records. Thc Phase I Future hnpact Fcc Crcdils shall be an actual cash value credit and shall not be a dwelling unit credit. I n ~acLEc.c_£rcdit.s2~ s~cll 13. In exchange for LBP's road construction and land dedication costs in the amount of al*proximately 5935.430 as described in Paragraph 11 of this Agreement For the Phase Il road construction, LBP shall be entitled to road impact fee credits upon completion oCthe Phase Il mad construction by LBP and submission orthe actual certification olrconstmction costs ("Phase Il Road Impact Fee Credits"). Thc credit for the donation oflaml shall bc effective upon recording ortho OR: 2494 PG: 1710 881 warranty deed or casement. The Phase 11 Road Impact Fcc Credits shall bc actual cash value credits and shall not be dwelling unit credits. 1.4. In the event thc County's right-of-way acquisition costs for Livingston Road for that portion of the right-of-way adjacent to the Property is reduced because of reduced righl-of-way requirements duc to an orban cross-section, LBP will receive road impact fcc credits based upon thc appraised valuc of thc right-of-way multiplied by thc reduced right-of-way acreage up to thc sum of $979,423.60 ("Contingency Road Impact Fcc Credits"). By way of example, if thc right of way necessary for that portion of Livingston Road adjacent to thc f'ropcrty is reduced by twenty (20) acres an~ thc appraised value of thc right-of-way is $25,000.t)0 per acre, LBP shall rcccivc Contingency Road Impact Fcc Credits totaling $500,000.00 (20 x $25,000.00 = $500,000.00). This paragraph shall only be in effect if the actual cost of constructing an urban cross section exceeds twenty percent of the initial certified estimated cost attached to this Agrecmcnt as Amended Exhibit D and only to thc extent of such excess costs. 15. Thc Phase I Road Impact Fcc Credit, Phase I Future Road Impact Fcc Credits. Ph:tsc II Road Impact Fcc Credits and Contingency Road Impact i:cc Credits shall be collectively referred to as "Road Impact Fee Credits." The Road Impact Fcc Credits may bc assigned by I.BP to other properties within thc area described in Exhibit "E" until completion of Livingston Road to Bonita Beach Road in Lee County ami, thereafter, to other properties within Road lmpact Fee District No. I. ~vhcthcr thc property is owned by LBP or by another property owner. 16. LBP reserves for itsclfand ils assigns thc right tn change linc types of uses to which the t~hase I Road Impact Fcc Credits may be applied. The road impact fcc ordinance in effect at Ibc time of application for a building pemfit shall be used lo value any credits which may be converted from one type of land use to anoti~er, whether by LBP or any of ils as~.igns. A¢~[Se of KQ.qd/~llact Fee Credits 17. Consistent with the timing schedule sc! tbrth in paragraphs 12 and 13 of this Agreement, the County shtall apply portions of the Road hnpact Fee Credits toward ti) the road impact fccs which LBP is~rcquircd to pay lbr cach building permit which is applied Ibr on the Property or (ii) any assignment of Road Impact Fcc Credits to other property owners, thereby redacing tile balance of thc Road Impact Fcc Credit by thc same amount. 18. Thc County shall provide LBP with a ccrti fled copy of this Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, such that LBP's certified copy of Exhibit "F" (Road Impact Fcc Credits Ledger) shall serve as the ledger sheet to document LBP's balance of Road Impact Fee Credit. 19. With each building pen'nit issued on thc Properly, the County shall subtract from thc Road Impact Fee Credit balance the amount of(i) Road hnpact Fees appropriate to that particular pcrmil, or (ii) Road Impact Fee Credits attendant to thc particular assignrnent, and shall enter the new balance in the ledger column labeled "Impact Fee Credit Balance." 20. County shall monitor impact fee collection within the Property to assure that only impact fee credits granted to LBP pursuant to this Agreement are used as impact fee payments for OR: 2494 PG: 27!28 ! all {mpact {'cc construct}on v,,ithin thc Property, until all }mpact fcc credits granted to LBP pursuant to this Agreement arc utilized by LBP or assigned in accordance with thc icons oi' this Agreement. 21. Thc County shah apply all road impact fecs col{feted by the County from properties }ocatcd within thai area described }n Exh{b}! "E" to thc Future Phase l Road Impact Fcc Cred{ts, Phase I[ Impact Fcc Credits and Future Phase 1I Road Impact Fcc Cred}ts {ssued to LBP pursuant to this Agreement. Upon application by LBP, thc County may forward to LBP, on a scm{-annual basis, said road impact fcc payments received by tile County. 22. No sooner than five (5) years from thc date o1' this Agreement, upon written application made to the Counly by LBP, thc County may, within sixty (60) days, refund to LBP moneys equal to thc current Road Impact Fee Credit balance. In thc alternative, the County shall continue to permit LBP to utilize or assign any remaining Road Impact Fcc Credits. 23. Other tha,I as provided in Paragraph 14, ill no event shall any road Impact fee credit be granted for the cost of constructlng the network improvements In excess of twenty percent of the initial certified estimate of costs attached to this Agreement as Amended Exhibit "D". This limitation does not apply to the valuation of land dedicated for road right-of-way which shall be valued based upon a county approved appraisal. 24. Upon conveyance of land interests to Collier Coumy, thc dc,.'clopcr shall provide an attorney's opinion as to the record title holder of said land interest, wi:ich opinion shall identify all I/cnholdcrs having any lien or cncmnbrance affecting said land interest. General Provj,~joll~ 25. Tbe burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to all successors in interest to LBP. 26. Except ~ provided herein, this Agreement shall only be modified or amended by a mutual written consent of thc parties hereto or by their successors in interest. Thc parties ackno'.,, ledge that this Agreement may be amended to address additional matters which were not foreseen by the parties at tile time they entered into this Agreement, such as issues related to stormwatcr runoff for that portion of Livingston Road south o£ thc southern boundary o£ the Property. 27. LBP shall keep or provide for the retention of adequate records and supporting documentation which concem or reflect thc total value of construction or installation of thc Road and Utility Project. This information shall bc available to County, or its duly authorized agents or representatives for audit, inspection, or copying, for a minimum of five (5) years from the completion and acceptance of the roadway improvements by the County. 28. LBP acknowledges that the donations or contributions contemplated under thc Agreement shall be construed and characterized as work done and property rights acquired by a highway or road agency for the improvement ora road v.,ithin thc boundaries ora right-of-way. ' .... 1712 ' OR: 2494 PG: 881 29. The County shall record this Agreement, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, within fourteen (14) days of its execution by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. 30. This written Agreement, including all exhibits and permits attached hereto, shall constitute thc entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and there arc no prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, understandings, promises, warranties or covenants not contained herein. 31. Either party to this Agreement may file an action for ~njunctivc rcliefin thc C'rcu't Court of Collier County, Florida, to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all other remedies available to thc parties for enforcement of the Agreement. 32. This Agreement shall bc construed in accordance with the laws ortho State of Florida. 33. In the fl~lfiliment of obligations set forth in this Agreement, time shall bc of thc 34. In the fulfillment of obligations set forth in this Agreement, time shall be of thc 35. LBP shall have the same obligations pertaining Io FPL facilities as set forth in the 1991 Engineering Plans prepared by Hole, Montes & Associates. Inc. for the portion of Livingston Road to be constructed pursuant to this Agreement it had if it ,.','ere to construct the east two lanes ora rural cross-section. 36. This Amended and Restated Developer Contribution Agreement shall supcrccde and replace the Developer Contribution Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their signatures by their duly authorized representatives. ~A[t~gg,~g~:,,ff,~t-.~ffz~, ~-- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ,. ..~- ..,,~ . BARB~X B. B~RRY, Chai~an s~gnature on1L 9 OR: 241713 '" "' ' 8B1 Approved as to form and legal suffic, icncy: Hcidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney WITNESSES: LONG BAY PARTNERS. LLC, a Florida limited liability company ~ g-g ' a Florida corporation, Print Narr[q,. Shirk})' M. 7'hompaor~ its Managing Member STATe OF FLO~DA COUNTY OF ~ d .. The fqrcgoing instrumenl was a~knowlexlged .before me this~?'d~ay of by/)U-~an Z/~a ~ 5 ., _~& ¢ ~e41]t~T. ~/ of Bonita Bay Propc~ies, Inc., a Florida co¢o~fion, M~aging M~b~ of ~ng Bay Pmne~, LLC, a Flodda limited liability comp=y, on behalf of the co.ration ~d limited li$oili~ ~mpmy. ~c ~ls personally knom to me or ~ has predue~d d~r'~ licc,,sc no, -~id~flcm~:- Name:. (T~c or Print) My Commission Expire*: I ~ ~ ¢ C0453441 OR: 2494 PG: 1714 8B1 A PAAC£L OF LANO LC)' ' t-~D I'N ~10~ ~1, ~, & ~3 TO~F.. ~ ~C~, R~GE ~ ~, ~OLLIE~ CO~f, FLOriDA, E~N~ MORE PAKT~CU~RLY ~C~ED A~ FOLLOWS; 50~H, ~NGE: ~, COLLIS~ CO~, ~O~IDA; THOLE ~ N. 00Ul'07' W, ALONG C~i :~ OF SA~ ~E~ON I~; ~C~ CO~ N. 00 ~2 07 W. ALONG ~ ~ LINE O~ THE 50~5T l/4 OF ~,E NOE~ l/4 OF SAIDSE~ON 1~ FOE A DI~ANCE OF 1316.~ ~ TO . T~ NO~ CO~E~ OF ~HE $O~ I/4 OF ~m~ Tn~CE E~ S. I/4 OF SAID SE~ON ~'~4'0~' W. ALONG ~E SO~ L~NE OF THE SO~H~ ~/4 OF ~E NOA~ ~/4 OF ~E NOE~ 1/4 OF-sAID SE~ON 12. FOA A D~ANCE 0F66:2~ FE~TO ~E SAID SE~ION I2; ~H~CE ~UN N. 00'$0~' W. ALONG T~E ~ LINE OF ~E ~O~ I/4 OF 7KE NO~ I/4 OF ~HE NO~ I/4 OF SAID SE~ON ~2, FOE A DI~ANCE OF 6~1.71 ~O ~,Tn~ :/4 OF ~A;D SE~ON 12; ~H~CE ~ ~. ~'~'47[ ALONG THE NO~TH L~E OF THE CI~ANCE O~ 661.9~ F~TO~E NOR~ CGRHE~ OF ~HE SO~ I/4 OF THE ~;CR?R~5T I/4 OF ~E NOI{~RW~ I/40~ ~AID 5EC~ON I~; ~HE:'tCE RUN N. 0O'~T07' ~, ALONG ~:E E~ LINE CF THE ~;OR~HW~ I/4 OF ~AID ~E.Z~C,N I;. FOR A DI~ANCE OF ~135 ~ TO · - -. ~ ~ST TO THE ~;OF~HW~T CO~,~5~, OF T~5 ~;O&TH'~T I/~ CF ~AID EE~ON I~ r ..... C~ 4. 0, E., ALONG THE W~T L~E OF THE ~OR~'~'~ 114 OF SAID ~E~iON IZ F,3~. A A D,_ ~A, . = Or Ii ~.~3 ~ TO THE NOKT~'~ CO~N~2. OF THE SO~H~$T 114 OF 1/4 OF T~ NOKTF~A~T I/4 OF SAID 55~ON I l, FC'A A DI~ANCE OF I]2039 ~ TO WH~CE R~ ~. 00'4 Y~- E A LONG ~RE ~ LINE OF WIlE NOR~H~r Ill O~ ~E SO~ C~ ~AiO S~ON Il, fO~ A DI~ANCE O~ 13~1.7] FE~'TO TH~ SC~w~ CORNER C,F THE ~;CR~;';~.:T I/4 OF THE 5OL~H~ l/4 OF ~AID ~,iTION I~; TH~C[ R~' S. ~'46'37' W. ALCHG D~SiANCR OF 1325.23 ~ tO THE NO~,TH'~ COR~;~ OF ~H5 S0~4~7 I/4 OF ~O~H'~T 1/4 CF THE SOPHIST 114 OF SAID SE~iC, N I I. FOR A DISTANC~ OF 13~.10 FE~ L ALONG THE ~OG~H LINE OF THE 10~4~ I/~'GF SAID 5E~iON I I. FOR A DI~ANC~ OF :~02J FE~ TO T4~ NOR~4W~CORN~ROF~E.~ ON 13. TG~SHIP 4~ SO,H, RANGE ~ ~-:~CE R~4 5. C0'~' ~ ALONG THE %~ L~NE OF ~HE NORTH'&'~ 1/4 OF SAiD SE~GN FOR A DISTANCE OF ~75.60 FE~ TO T~ 5O~HW~ CO~NER OF THE NOK~H~ 114 ~'THE NO~,~rTm~T 1/4 OF ~H~ NOK~H~ 1/4 OF SAID SE,~ON 13; TH~CE R~ N. ~['~'1~' & ALONG ~4E SG~ L~E OF ~HE NO~HW~T I/4 OF THE NG~HW~ I/4 OF ~H~ NGR~W~ I/4 OF ~AIO S~'~ION 13. FOR A DISTANCE OF ~.12 FE~ TO THE SOb~m~,,~ CO~NER OF ~E NGR~W~T I/4 OF ~H~ NOK'~tW~T I/4 OF THE NOK~HW~ I/4 OF SAID SE~ON I~; ~4~NCE R'~ N. 00 '41'49' W. ALONG ~ ~ST L~E OF T~E NOK~HW~ I/4 OF ~ NOR~W~ I/4 OF ~E NO~ff~T l/4 OF $AID SE~ON 13, FOR A DI~AN'~ OF 675.07 ~ TO THE CO~NE~ OF ~ NO~H~T l/4 OF ~H~ NORT~ I/4 OF ~ NOR~H~ l/4 OF SAID 5~ON 13; ~H~CE K~ N. ~'4 l'O0' ~ ALONG T4E ~O~H L~E OF ~HE SO~W~T 1/4 OF SE~ON 12, TO~$HIp 4~ ~O~H, ~NG~ ~, FOR A DI~ANC5 OF 199~31 FE~TO POINT OF B EGI~I~G. T~c scu~ 114 of ~sOu~w~ 1/4, I~ sc~ ]0 f~ ~ scu~ 114 of ~c :cr~w:{ I/4 :m4 sOu~hw: I/4 Of ~c :cr~: 1/4 ~d :c~w: 1/4 of ~c i/4 ~d :or~:: 1/4 of ~ sou~w~ 1/4, I~ ~F~ I~ cf sau~.~ I/4 of 1/4 of scu~w~ 114 cf S~o= 11, To~ ~ So~. ?~gc ~ ~t, Co,er Co~/. . _ · ',. ' OR: 2494 PG: 1715 // COLLIER COUNTY ~ /]i ~ LIVINGSTON ROAD PHASE 2 .~ LIVINGSTON ROG PHASE 1 .... IMMOKAL[[ ROA0 ~,, ~ ~ENDED EXHIB~ 'B' · LO~ BAY P~ ~1 WILSON ~ MILLER ~m~o~ OR: 2494 PG: 1716 881 AMEND£.D EXH]BIT'C Description of Work Livingston Road (North-South Segment) Phase I will consist of approximately 13,720 lineal feet of n,,'o-lane arterial urban roadway from Immokalee Road to the proposed LBP project entrance. The construction will include mobilization; clearing and grubbing; filling and grading; roadway subgrade, base and asphaltic concrete paving; installation of storm drainage facilities; sodding and seeding; seeding; signage and pavement markings; lighting; signalization; traffic control; construction engineering and inspection and materials testing: construction surveying and layout; and all incidental work necessary, to complete the roadway in accordance with the construction plans and specifications prepared by Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. and approved by Collier County. The work will also conform to the requirements set forth in the South Florida Water Management District Permit No. 11-01359-s and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit No. 199001402('IP-CC) as it applies to construction of this facility (mitigation requirements are not included). Phase II 9,511 consist of approximately 2,480 lineal feet of two-lane arterial urban roadway from the proposed LBP project entrance to the Collier/Lee County line. The construction will include mobilization; clearing and grubbing; filling and grading; roadway subgrade, base and asphaltic concrete paving; installation of' storm drainage facilities; sodding and seeding; seeding; signage and pavement markings; lighting; signalization; traffic control; construction engineering and inspection and materials testing; construction surveyN, g and layout; and all incidental work necessary to complete the roadway in accordance with the construction plans and specifications prepared by Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. and approved by Collier County. The work will also conform to the requirements set forth in the South Florida Water Management District Permit No. I 1-01359-s and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit No. 199001402(IP-CC) as it applies to construction of'this facility ( tttgatton reqmrements are not included). I, EXH,B,TO OR: 2494 PG: 1717 OPINI[ OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION )ST LIVINGSTON ROAD ~ Livingston Road Phase I (13,720 IF) No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 3 Cteadng & Grubbing 89 AC $ 2.100.00 $ 186,900.00 4 Sidewalk 7,700 SY $ 12.50 i $ 96,250.00 5 Shoulder Base 13.000 SY S 5.00 $ 65.000.00 6 Type S Asphal6c Concrete (2') 48,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 195.200.00 7 Fdc~on Course 48,800 SY $ 200 $ g7,600.00 8 Roadway Base 36,60(3 SY 5 600 $ 219.600.00 9 =dee & Tack Coat 5.70¢ GA S 1.§0 S 10.720,00 10 type B Stabifizat[on (12") 51,80C SY $ 1.40 $ 72.520,00 11 niets/MHS/MES/EEW 7C FcA S 75000 $ 52.500.00 12 Storm Pipe 5.50( LF 5 30.00 $ 165,000.00 13 Sodding/FerlYWater 178.40( SY 5 1,20 $ 214,080.00 14 Seed/Mulch 167,70( SY $ 020 S 37,540.00 15 Signing & Marking 13.70( LF 5 3,50 S 47.950.00 16 Signalization LS S 55.000.00 $ 55,000.00 18 Ear:hwork (Embani, menl) 185.20( CY 5 7.50 5 1.389.00000 t g Construction Engineering and tnsDectJon (CEI) and Materials Testing $ 253.000.00 Livingston Road Phase I Total s 3.499.470.00 Livingston Road Phase II (2,480 LF) Two Lanes 1 MobfllzaUon LS $ 62.500.00 i 5 62.50000 2 Mainlenance of Trafflc 0 LS 5 3 Cleadr,:J & Grubbing 15 AC $ 2,100.00 ! $ 31.500.00 5 Shoulder Base 2.300 SY 5 5.00 I $ 11.500 00 6 Type S Asphaltic Concrete (2') 6.800 SY $ 4.00 $ 35.200 00 7 Friction Course 8,800 S¥ 5 2.00 5 17.80000 8 Roadway Base 6,600 S¥ $ 6.00 S 39.600.00 9 ~dme & Tack Coat 1.200 GA 5 1.60 I $ 1.920.00 I0 Type B Stabilization 112') 9.400 SY 5 1.40 I $ 13.160.00 t I inletS/MHS/MESIEW 14 EA I $ 750,00 $ 10.500.00 Livingston Road Phase II Total i $ 58.1,83o.0o Total Phase I + Phase II i s 4,183,300.00 Estimated costs do not include landscaping, uUliUes, fight-of-way, storm waler treatment or environmental work. HMA F'ge g8.g$ - Page 27 · ,~ .,.&,,~ ~. · EXJ.II~iT E LONG 8AY PARTNE~ DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGnEEM~NT IMPACT FEE ASSIGNMENT AREA 'Pelican Slrand PUD Is.~ol included unlil connected Io Livingston Road *** OR: 2494 PG: 1719'"~ .ROAD ' iMPACT FEE CREDIT LEDGER IMPORTANT: This Road ' impact Fee Credit Ledger Is intended to document the balanca of Utility Imp.act Fee Credits appIylng ONLY to the following property: Beginning Balance ............................. $ ~.OADIMPACT IMPACT FEE ~Q~;NTY DATE PERMIT NO. FEES DUE CREDIT 8ALANCE · Jeff Bibby Jeff is a Civil Engineer with 21 years of broad based, project management experience. A graduate of the University of Massachusetts, he began his career with Northeast Utilities in Connecticut as an engineer in their corporate engineering group. There he served as a Project Engineer for a variety of projects related to their Connecticut and Massachusetts generating facilities including new Emergency Operations Centers at two sites and a Radwaste Storage facility. Later he became their Civil Design Manager responsible for all corporate based Civil and Structural design. He led a group of 18 Designers and Drafters supporting projects throughout the two state region. During this time, he implemented an Integraph CAD System that positioned the group for greater efficiency in the future. He also received his MBA from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute while attending classes after hours. Next, Jeff served as Manager of Projects for one of the utility's operating units with responsibility for a large Capital Improvement Program. There he led a 60 person group of engineers, analysts, designers, drafters and schedulers to develop and implement capital projects to allow the plant to continue operation into the future. This position required significant interaction with regulators and the various stakeholders of the finished projects to ensure all needs were addressed. From there, he moved to their Haddam Neck, Connecticut facility to head .p their Civil/Structural Engineering group. Most recently, he has been responsible for all engineering design as their Engineering Manager for Decommissioning. There he has been leading their 45 person engineering group to facilitate the dismantlement and demolition of the plant. Jeff's experiences in leading large, multidiscipline groups and managing multiple (100 plus) projects at any one time provided the framework for his success in meeting the needs of the various groups he supported. He looks forward to drawing further upon these experiences to lead our Public Works Engineering Department and ensure the needs of the Division are similarly met. He is eager to become a member of the team. Jeff and his wife Sue are excited about becoming Southwest Florida residents. Sue is a Registered Nurse with the State of Florida. Similarly, Jeff is a Florida PE and member of the Florida Engineering Society. He looks forward to dropping his "Out of State" status and joining the Calusa chapter. They look forward to their relocation with their two daughters, Jackie (a High School Senior) and Lauren (who will be starting High School next year). The entire family is eager to take advantage of all that the area has to offer. DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES SIIELTER AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment #1 to the Agreement dated Mav 26 1998 (hereinafter "AGREEMENT") is made and entered into this ,/0 ?:7_x.. day of "-/7 ~'¢'"- , 1998, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinatter referred to as the "OWNER") and Bacon Group Inc. a Florida corporation. authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 1:26 Third Avenue North, Suite 102, Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 (hereina~er referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETlt WHEREAS. OWNER and CONSULTANT currently have a valid professional services agreement for the provision of professional services for the DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES SHELTER (hereinaz~er referred to as "PP, OJECT'). said services more fully described in said AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, OWNER and CONSULT~\'T agree some modification to the services being co::templated under said AGREEMENT are necessary; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that he has the expertise and the type of professional services that will be required for the completion of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and provisions contained herein, parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE 1.1 CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER professional engineering services in all phases of the project to which this Amendment applies. 1.2 CONSULTANT shall provide professional services in addition to those as outlined in said AGREEMENT as noted in Schedule A of this Amendment as attached as hereto. ARTICLE TWO 2.1 OV~qER agrees to compensate CONSULTANT for services rendered hereunder as prescribed in Schedule B, entitled "Schedule of Fees for Basic Services (B attachment A) and Consultant's Estimate of Additional Services (B attachment C), as outlined in said AGREEMENT with the modifications to Attachments A and C to said AGREEMENT which are attached hereto and made a part hereof ARTICLE THREE 3.1 The schedule for said Project shall be shown in the revised schedule C as attached hereto. ARTICLE FOUR g [: 1' MI 4. I The AGREEMENT. as amended shall remain in flail force and ef¥cct. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for the DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES SItELTER the day and year first written above ATTESTo:~(d~.s to Chairman) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR .... -,,: ' ~' ~' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A o,, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE ~ ';'"' ' '6 OF FLORIDA , :'. :,d.~'*" ':' * ,;,Dwight E. Brock. Clerk ' Barbara l~-Berr3.. Chairman , Attest as to Chairman's signature on)$. Approved as to fora and legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney Bacon Group Inc. 126 Third Avenue North Suite 102 ~'~ Ba~on, AIA( ~resident Wit~ss ' ' W 'BACON GROUP ~' 72~ 10/19/98 15!~0 ~ :02/04" " SCl Attachment "A" AMENDMENT TO THE SERVICES GENERAL This document shall amend the DOMESTIC ANIMAL SERVICES SHELTER, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. RFP #97-2754 dated May 26, 1908 and Purchase Order No. 803766. SCOPE: The contract liar m'chitcctural and engin~ring services Is amended duc o the increase in project scope and development costs, The original project scope as described in paragraph A. 1,1, of thc above agreement states the need for structures of approximately 15,000 squ~rc fetal and thc OWNER'S budget $1.300,000.00 includmg constrt ction cost and mil consultant fees as stated in paragraph A.2.3. I, Development of the Programming and Space Needs Report issued by the B~on G-'roup, Inc. and subsequent review by Collier County indicates the need for a project of approxlmately 33.086 squm'e feet wkh a total projected cost of Two Million Three Hundred Fifty Eight Thou.qand Seven Hundred 'Fairly Nine Dollars end Six Ceres. ($2,358.739,06). This cost includes money allocated for ~-nJture fixtures and equipment, contLngency and additional architecturnl and engineering fees. ADDITION ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING COMPENSATION: ,, ,.' Due to thc increase in project scope and budget, this amendment tm the above .grceme, nt is for the · . additional m'ch/tectural and engineering fees. Thc m:ldition~l fees as described below ~d in the ~' ,! :;'--' revised Schedule B - Attm:hment A, Schedule Fees for Basic Servicas and Schedule B - : Attachment C, (Con.suh~nl's Estinmte ul'AdditionaI Service,,), B~ls of Cumpen.,;a ion. · Origimfi Design Fe". $158,445,00 '. ~ 74.095.00 Total l~sign Compensation $232,540.00 ; End of Amcndmont :I~ ' Collie" County Domestic Animal Shehm' BACON GROUP ~' 725 0209 ' 10/19/98 15:10 ~ :03/04 N0:034 .-. 8CI,,il! Collier County Now Domestic Anlmel Shelter $chedulm 13. A~chm~nt A Sch~ule F~ f~ B.~c So~l~s No Name Ba~n A~llan~ ~lden Hole Sie~in G~h Subto~ls Group, Inc. ~slgn Lobni~ Montes& ~. Group ~r A~. ~ I~gn Re~ I 5.479 8~ 2,8~ 8~050 7~405 J 25,574 25~245 3~4~ 10~8~ 7,~ 5.5~ 3.500 ~.089 A4 ~Flnal ~qn~ ~897 7~785 17~0 28,200 7,2~ 105~082 A5 ~Const Bid Se~ice ~ 4~053 1,300 1.500 1,4~ 110 ... 8.~3 A0 Con~ ~min I 7,300 2,~ 2,8~ 3~8~ .... 2~ ~8,8~ ~7, Co.n~ O~ion J 9.B~ ) 3,800 3.~a I 3.5~ 2~ ..... 20.810 TOTALS: I ~8,~74) ~g,{36 J 38~ J 63~ .201~7 3~0 '232.~ SA¢ON GROUP '~'725 0209! 10/19/95 15:10 ~:04/04 N0:034 80I Collier County New Dom~t~c Anlmel Shelter 8ch~ule B - ~chment C Connul~nff~ E~mn~ of Add~onal So~Ic~ I ~dmonal Conmm~lon Obviations 2 Amh~u~l Rendedn~ 2,7,50 3I 4 Permi~inq fo Incinerator 4,0~.~ 5 Ba~n Group Field O~lon ID~/Pe~n~ 8 A an~ Field O~io~D~/Pe~n 250/d~/~n 71TLC Field O~mio~D~/Pe~n ~d~ 8~HM~ Find O~MIo~Dw/Pe~n 2~d~/~n ~ ~ _ 9 S~e~ln Reid Ob~atlon/D~lPe~n 1.20~d~/~ I I 10 Field Te~ln~ Dufi~ Const~lon 2.~0.~ i I B~el~ of ¢ompene~lon NO g~scnptlon Amount From Lump Optional Monthly Momnly Schedule B Sum Monthly P~mem [B22] A~hm~ A P~me~ P~mo~ % ~ J~s,qn R.~ $25.574.~ J Y,I ~ JNO NO A3 JPralimina~ ~stqn ~.08g.~ Y~ J Y~ No NO A4 IFina, ~,an J $105.0~,~ J Yes I Y~ NO No ~5' J C~mion BIdSe~i~ ~,~3.~ J Y~ I No No No ~ C~ion Cont~ Admini~ion S15.~.~ I Y~ j Y~ J NO NO A7 Detall~ Con~ion Ob~lon $20,810.~ I No ~__No J Y~ Ne JAddition~l Se~l~ , A~hmont B or C I No ~ ~ J NO Y~ ,MEMORANDUM . June' 17 ~ TO: Peroy W H~llison, Jr,, Directo'r r Division o~ ~ta%e o~ Lands FROM: ~William ¢. Robinson, Yr., Assistant General Counsel 'o~fiee o~ thc Exscutive Director SUBJECT: Bare£oot Beach Preserve (TruStees Lease ~o. 3868) 1. What does the phrase ",.. non-exclusive permanent easement for ingress and egress ~,." mean, as used in thc February 1, 1978, deed (attached) and August 1, 1978, agreement (attached)? 2. Does ~aragraph 5 of the unrecord.d August 1, 1978 agreement authorize the location o~ the oxisting guardhouse in state's public access easement? 3. If the answer to question No. 2. above, is negative, does the paragraph in ~estion authorize any other type o~ checkpoint structure within the access easement? 1. The re~erenoed l~nguage grants the Board of Trustees, successors and assigns, and the general public the perpetual right to usa the easement.parcel an~ the road constructe~ thereon access to %he state property 'known as the "Barefoot Beach Preserve", mub~eot to the rights o~ the owner o~ the lan4 containing the road (end other third parties who have been grants4 similar rights) to use the road in a manner which is compatible with the rights o~ ~he Board of Trustees and the general 2 and 3. The answer to questions numbered 2 and ~ above, is :. a qualified "No". However, under Florida law, %he owner o~ the · '. land containing the Trustees' easement has the qualified right to use such lands in a manner which ia compatible with the rights the Trustees and the general pUBlic to.use the road located withln the easement parcel. '1. In order to an.alyze the phrase "non-exclusive permanen~ June 17, 1993 easement for ingress And agrees", it is necessary to first analyss the component parts contained in this wording. An"easement" has been de£ined by the Florida supreme Court as a privilege under ~h%¢h the owner o~ one pro9arty interest has a rust in or ever the property interest o~ right to enJo! that lpte. ,_ ~_ ~.,, restricted in his us}ge o~ his propert~_~Y ~e ~ ,0% so. 648, {19~6). ThU~f .alt~A~%u~_n_.~ 8ewell, 92 F~ormua ~,~, 'i' - - ,o ~d en4o¥~ent in ~nu ~: easement creates certain'rights cz usa~ ..... the or parties in whose ~avor the easement is granted, parcel o~ land over which the easement runs is stiX1 owned by another (usually the party who originally granked the easement , or his successor in interest)- The ~act that ~he easement i~ permanent indicates that t~e term is intended to be perpetual, rather then being limited to s term o~ years. The phase "ingress and egress" defines thc n~ture o~ the usage granted. Thus, this easement is to be used ~or access purposes rather than for utility, drainage, or other purposes. It appears clear that the intent o~ the part'ice was that the state (including both. the g~neral public and any successors, assigns, or %ransferee$ o~ the Board o~ Trustees) was intende~ to have unrestricted use of the easement corridor and any road located therein. For example, paragraphs numbere~ 2 and 4 o~ that certain agreement dated August 1, 1978, (attached), between the Board of Trustees o~ the Internal improvement Trust Fund of the State o~ Florida ("State") and Lely Estates, Inc. ("Corporation"), whereby the state released portions el its previously granted easemen~ rights over a certain part of the original easement corrider in return lot receiving easement rights in a more desirable location, recite that: 2. The CORPORATION hereby grants the STATE e permanent easement ~or ingress and egress over the 60 foot easement corridor described on Exhibit "A" hereto, including specifically the right to use any road now or hereafter constructed within such corridor. 4. All rights granted by this Agreement to the STATE shal~ benefit any transferees, successors or assigns of the STATE"~nd shall not be restricted in any ~ay. ~*' The fact that the easement is non-exclusive means that the party granting the easement in favor of the Board of Trustees ~,i(.! JL~-29-199J 13:39 FROM DEPT. ~TL~ REE~¢ES TO P.~S Memo to Percy W. Mallison, Jr. June 17, 1993 Page $ o~ 4 retains the right to USe the lands containing the road in a manner which ia compatible with, and not unreasonably restrictive o~, the state's easement rights, and to grant similar compatible uses to third parties. 2 'and 3. In my opinion, the agreement re,eton=ed in the paragraph~ numbered 2 and 3 6f your memorandum doe~ not obligate the Board o~ Trustees to allow the existence o~ a guardhouse or gate within the easement corridor. The agreement in question dated August 1, 1978, was executed by the State o~ Florida Department Natural Resources ("DNR") end Lely Estates, Inc. {"Corporation"). At that time, the Barefoot Beach Preserve was managed by the Division o~ Becreations and Parks of the Department of Natural Resources, with the permission of the Board o~ Trustees. The agreement gives the Department of Natural R.~ources, as the managing agency, the right to locate utility lines within the easement corridor, and to tie into water, sewage, eleotrlcal end telephone lines being install¢~ by Lely Estates, Inc. in oonnectlon with its development o~ the ~urrounding subdivision. Paragraph 5 o~ this instrument is the operative paragraph, for our purposes: A gate may be installed to llm, t use of the road to necessary s~ate b~siness, as determined by D~K, %lntil the stat. property is opened. Once the pro;arty is opened, the gate may be kept closed to'the general public only after state property visiting hours pursuant to a schedule developed by DNR, which schedule may be altered £rom time to time by DNR. Thus, although the agreement contemplate= the construction a gate, it appears that the method o~ operation o~ the gate was intended to be subject to the approval o~ the managing agency. Any agreement entered into between Lely Estates, Inc. and the managing agency would be subject to the easement rights granted to the Board o~ Trustees by separate instrument. That is to say, the agreement in question, which was not executed by the Board not obligate the Board o~ TrUstees to ~llow the existence Of the guardhouse or gate within the easement corridor. CAVEAT: As noted above, the easement in question Thus, although in my opinion the unrecorded August 1, 1978, Agreement ~oe$ not obllgat, the Board e~ Trustees ~o allow a guardhouse or gate to be located ~ith£'n the easement corridor, it should be remembers4 that the easement does not limit th~ u~e an~ enjoyment o~ the road exclusively .to the Board o~ Trustees or the general public. Tho ~act that the easement is non-exclUsiVe compatible usage by the landowner, provided that su¢~ usage doe~ JL~.-~-19c~ i3:40 FR~ DEPT. f~TL~ RESCURCES TO p.~ Memo to PercI W. Mallison, Jr. June 17, 1993 Page 4 o~ 4 not materially interfere with the full use and enjoyment of the state's easement. See Sections 110,12 (3) and 110.14, Boyer, " Florida Real Estate ~ransaction~, and also G~off v. Moses 344 2d 951, (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Thus, the right of the ]andown.r to operate and maintain a guardhouse and gate within the eaaement corridor will ~tand or fall based upon the method of operation, and the degree of interference with the rights of the state and the general public to the full use and enjoyment of the road within the easement corridor, as a means of access to the Barefoot Beach Preserve, In my.o~inion, the proposal discussed by Jack Pons, of thi~ agency, (whereb~ %he landownsr would prouide a "~ree access" traffic lane for those members o~ the general Dubllc using the road to access the Barefoot Beach Preserve, unrestricted by.gates or guards, but would require residents or visitors seeking to gain access to the surrounding subdivision to use a second traffic lane wherein passes or permits confirming access to the subdivision could be checked or handed out on a temporary basis, as required) would not constitute an unreasonable burden or interference with the =igh~ o~ the Trustees or the public under the existin~ easement documents. Hopefully, this discussion has clarified the questions referenced above. As always, please feel free to contact me should any additional clarification be WCR/dw. cc: Jack Pons David Stevenson attachments NAPLES ~ FLORIDA 655 · 103rd AVE., NORTH ~ NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940 SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 EMILY DEMAGIO 250 SECOND STREET NORTH COLLIER COUNTY 34134 RE~ .OSITION ON REMOVAL DR RELOCATION DF GATE HOUSE AT BAREFOOT BEACH. ' DEAR EMILY RELATING TO THE ONGOING COUNTY PROBLEM OF ENFORCING REGULATIONS THAT EFFECT "PUBLZC RIGHT OF WAY" AT THE ENTRANCE OF BAREFOOT PUBLIC BEACH DEVELOPMENT. MEMBERS OF THE NAPLES' PARK AREA ASSOCIATION HAVE BEEN REQUESTING ,,~ FOR YEARS THAT THE GUARD HOUSE BE REMOVED FROM ITS PRESENT LOCATION ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE PUBLIC BEACH PARK APPROXIMATELY ONE AND A HALF MILES SOUTH OF ENTRANCE OFF BONITA BEACH ROAD IN NORTH COLLIER COUNTY. YOUR ASSISTANCE IN GETTING THIS PROBLEM RESOLVED, "GIVING OPEN AND UNEMPAIRED ENTRANCE TO ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING PUBLIC BEACHES W~LL BE GREATLY APPRIC~ATED. SINCERLY MARIE T. SOURBEER PRESIDENT NP** INC. .-~ mproxemen{ ssoc n{ on Oct, 19, 1997 To the Collier County Bo~d of Commissioners, And All Othen ~om it May Con.m: Emily Marlo is the official ~pre~nmtive and s~kes~rson for Bonito Shores and Li~le Hickow Sho~s Improvement A~iation on mattem ~mining to Collier Coun~ issues. A long-time member in good standing of the Shores Club, Ms. Ma~o tmditio~lly stays ~lMnfomed and interested coun~ Sincereh,, Wall, President "~on 'David./ce President Pat Baum~, Secre~ Comer commissioners reject Barefoot Beach tccess proposal 2nd guardhouse denied ~'"'~"""~"'"'"'~""~" By UZ ERNST ~ ~ R~lden~ pleaded with ~m, intent ~ create I bl~ler ~ keep sat~ ~, ~ be t~n~ away ~t ~ple, ~ellvvl~ r~ ~d 26920 Old 41 · Next to Nclso~ Plaza ~e ~tnee when as lot b lull the~ Irl~ds i~ ~ ~e 992-3200 when the P~lbt h f=ll, Check With Us For Our ~tch ~mbers' ~mment fueled ' ~C3h ~Sh ~ ~a tw~llt.~n nit It a~ ~k~ ~lonea ~ ~der 8c~ood Dally .~.~ ,=~,,. ,,~., ~ Don't I ,pend A Fortune To Have.Your ,, ,., ~.',, ,~., ~,,.. ~--- Hone Professionally Decorated :t~c~f ~e L~C d~ ~d ~" ~ WITHOUT THE ~ .,:~;~' -- 482-2992 orl-800-226.2992 (~tS~e Lee Cry) ," CITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF BONITA BEACH CABB BONITA SPRINQS, FLORIDA 33959 JANUARY 6, 1995 MR. GARY FRANCO, PARKS SUPERINTENDENT COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIvisioN OF PUBLIC SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3300 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD NAPLES, FLORIDA 55999 DEAR GARY: RE: BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE VISITOR ACCESS SURVEY FOR LAST QUARTER 199q THIS IS THE QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMARIZED AS REPORTED IN TO OUR ASSOCIATION BY THE BEACHGOING PUBLIC FOR OCTOBER, NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 1994 TO BECOME A PART OF YOUR REPORT TO DEP, LMAC DIVISION, IN TALLAHASSEE. THERE ARE NO INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINT LETTERS INCLUDED BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN URGING PEOPLE TO WRITE THESE LETTERS OF COMPLAINT AND TO SEND THEM IN DIRECT AT THE TIME. IT IS MOST DIFFICULT, HOWEVER~ TO GET THE PUBLIC TO SIT DOWN AND RECORD THEIR DIFFICULTIES--THEY.PREFER TO VOICE IT INSTEAD SO WE CAN ONLY TRUST THAT SOME OF THEM HAVE DONE AS WE SUGGESTED. WE DO HAVE~ HOWEVER~ THE OUTLINE OF VERIFIED TIMES THAT THE "OWNER'S GATE# AT THE LELY GUARDHOUSE WAS FOUND TO BE IN A DOWN (CLOSED) POSITION WHICH AS WE ALL KNOW IS CONTRARY TO THE LMAC AGREEMENT OF 1995 AS SIGNED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET. AS STATED PREVIOUSLY~ MANY OF THE PEOPLE ARE NOT EVEN REPORTING IN ON THIS BECAUSE THEY MERELY STATE "IT is NEVER up" WHICH HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIATED BY YOUR OWN PARK PERSONNEL AND VERIFIED BY THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE LELY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, RICHARD TIMBERS~ PUBLICLY AT THE OCTOBER lq COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING ON THIS SUBJECT, AT WHICH TIME HE VOWED IT NEVER WOULD BE uP. COPIES OF THE BONITA BANNER ARTICLES OF NOVEMBER 19, DECEMBER 7, DECEMBER 17 AND DECEMBER 31 ARE ALSO ENCLOSED (MANY OF THESE WERE REPEATED IN THE NAPLES DAILY NEWS) WHICH OUR ASSOCIATION FEELS DOES AN ADEQUATE JOB OF DESCRIBING THE SITUATION AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS. IT IS OUR THOUGHT THAT THESE SHOULD BE FORWARDED ON TO LMAC TO KEEP THEM ABREAST OF THE SITUATION. /"HANK YOU. VERY TRUI'y YOURS,, CITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF BONITA BEACH--C.A.B.B. MFW MARJORIE F. ~ARD ENCS. DAVID W. WARD VICE PRESIDENT BONITA SPRIN~So ~LORIDA 33959 BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE GATES AT GUARDHOUSE OWNER'S GATE CLOSED/DowN--LAsT QUARTER 199q 199q WHO REPORTED COMMENT~ TIME 10~30 A.M. # 10-3 ' 8:30 A.M. lO-q # 8~30 A.M. ' 10 30 10-~ A. LORSAY 8,30 A.M. 10-9 " . 8,~0 A.M. 10-10 " . 8:30 A.M. 10~q5 A.M. 10-11 " 9,40 A.M. 10-12 " 6;00 P.M. M. WARD 1~30 P.M. E. MA~XO 2~30 P.M. E. MAOO)O q,00 P.M. 10-13 Au ~RSAY 8)30 A.M. 11,00 A.M. $. ZWO~INSK! 10:00 A.M. C. RENN~R 9:10 A.M. 10-1~ A. LORSAY 8:)0 A.M. " 10)1~ A.M. WARD 1):25 AoM° 10-15 A. L~RSAY 8:30 A.H. 10:20 A.M. SAM &.LYDIA ROSS 12:00 P.M, 1:30 4:20 P.H. 10-16 A. LORSAY 8:30 A H 10:30 IO-1Z A. LORSAY 8:30 A 11 05 ' A.M. 10-18 " . 8:30 10:qg A.M. ' 10-19 E. MAOOIO 2:30 P M q:00 10-20 A. LORSAY 10:50 A.M. 10-22 A. LORSAY 6:05 P.M. g. PEPPER ONE CAR STOPPED IN NO STOP- q:~0 P.M. ~', PING LANE WITH GUARD TALKING TO THE DRIVER. 2 CARS BEHIND. J. PEPPER ONE CAR AT OWNERS GATE HAD TO 5=00 P.M. BACK UP TO OTHER GATE TO GET THROUGH--INTIMIDATING. 10-23 A. LORSAY 8:q0 A.M. C0-2q J. PEPPER 10:00 A.M. 10-25 A. LORSAY 8:~0 A.M. J. PEPPER 6:00 P.M. 10-28 A. LORSAY 10:00 10-~0 # 10:00 A.M. I0-31 · 10:IS A,M. T. BRENNAN 11:30 A.M. · 11-1 A. LORSAY 9:q5 A.M. , 11-2 A. LORSAY 9:50 A.M. 9:45 ' LYDIA &,, SAM ROSS 2:50 P.M. 11-6 A. LORSAY $:q0 A.M. 8:20 A.M. 11-16 5:10 P.M. 9:10 A.M. 11-18 9:00 A.M. 11-25 10:45 A.M. '~ 11:00 A.~. 9:55 A.M. 12-1 A. /o~$~¥ · , 9:05 ' 10:15 A.M. 12-2 " 9:20 " 10:45 12 5 9 50 A " 11:00 A,M. 12-4 " 8:50 A.M. 0. M. WHEATON 11:00 A.M. # 1 00 P.M. 12-5 A. LOR. SAY 1080635 A.M. 0. M. WHEATON A.M. 1 00 P.M. 3 00 P.M. J. PEPPER 3 50 P.M. ' 4 00 P.M. 12-6 A. LORSAY 8 30 A.M. " 9 50 J. PE.PPER 11:00 A.M. 0. M. WHEATON 11:25 A.M. 3:00 P.M. ' 4:45 P.M. 12-7 A. LORSA¥ 8:45 A.M. " 10:25 A.M 0. M. WHEATON 4:00 P.M. " 5:00 P.M. 12-8 A. LORSAY 8:05 A.M. " 8:40 A.M. O. M. ~/HEATON 2:45 P.M. ' 4:15 P.M. 12-9 A. LORSAY 9:00 A.M. " 10:24 A.M. 12-10 , 9:10 A.M. 10:45 A.M. 12-11 " 9:25 A.M. " 11:05 A.M. 12-12 " 9:20 A.M. 10:48 A.M. 12-15 " 8:55 A.M " 10:35 A.M. 12-15 M, WARD 8:30 A.M. Ao AND J. PEPPER 8:40 AoM. A. LORSAY 8:q5 A.M. G. BANKS 8:q/ A.M. D. SCANLON 8:50 A M. r M' CAMPBELL 8:55 A M' ' E' AND W' CARTER 9:00 A M. · D. LISTENBERGER 9:03 A M. ., P. AND D. LAPHAM 9:05 A M. B. KRUSCHEL g:10 A M. ' R. CLEARY 9:15 A M. ' B. KRUSCHEL, G. BANKS, B & L MATTHEWS 9:17 A M. J. PEPPER, D. SCANLON 9:19 A M. M. CAMPBELL, M. WARD, P. LAPHAM 10:00 A M. M. CAMPBELL 10:07 A M. A. LORSAY 10:25 A.M. M. WARD 10:30 A,M. B. KRUSCHEL, G. BANKS~ 8 g L MATTHEWS 11:30 A.M. J. PEPPER, D. SCANLON ll:q0 A.M. E. AND V. KAUFFMAN ll:q5 A.M. ' P. LAPHAM 11:55 A.M. D. WARD 12:15 P.M. A. AND J. PEPPER 12:55 P.M. G. BANKS 1:00 P.M. D. SCANLON 1:05 P.M. B. KRUSCHEL l:10 P.M. E. AND V. KAUFFMAN l:12 P.M. R. CLEARY 1:15 P.M. E. AND W. CARTER 1:20 P.M. D. LISTENBERGER 1:25 P.M. D. AND P, LAPHAM 1:30 P.M. M. CAMPBELL 1:35 P.M. M. WARD l:qO P.M. D. WARD 1:45 P.M. 12-16 A, LORSAY 8:30 A.M. 10:02 A.M. 10:10 A.M 12-18 . 8:45 A ..M 10:30 A.M. 12-19 ' 5:00 P.M. 12-20 8:35 A.M. " 10:15 A.M. Il:00 A.M. 12-25 · 9:30 A.M. 11:05 A.M. 12 26 A LORSAY · ..... ~ '4' ' 9 ~0 · . 12-27 A. LORSA¥ 9:20 A ,~ 11:00 ~ 12-28 , 8:q5 A.M. , 10:28 A.M. 12-29 11:05 A.u. 12-~0 10:q5 A.U. 12-31 " 10:55 A.M. 199~ TiME 1-2~ 1 2-4 11:40 A.M. 2-4 11:50 A.~. 2-5 D, & ~. WARD ~ 11:~5 A,M, G. BANKS 12:50 P,~, D, ~ ~. WARD 12:~5 P,m, 2-7 G.BANKS 11:50 A.~. M. WARD 2:50 ~. & D. WARD 9~00 A.M. D. WARD 9:00 A.M. E,. MAGGIO 9:45 A.M. M. ~ D. ~ARD ~ ' 10:00 A M : ~ 10:20 A.~. 2-15 ~. 10:q5 A.M. ~ ~, 12 NOON 2-17 M. WARD - 11:~5 A.M. JAS. PEPPER ~ 9:00 A.M. D. WA~D g:15 A.M. 2-28 M. WARD 8:20 A.M. 8:~0 A.M, R. MIKTUK 9:20 A.M. .. A.M. ~9. WARD 9~5 A.M, J. PEPPER ~EE LETTER ATTACHED 1.58 ' ''~'' ~I5 0.M.WHEATON ~TOPPED BY GUARD-SO ~. ' TOLD GUARD GOING TO PARK 5-17 M. g D. ~ARD ~ CARS,(N LiNE 9:25 A.M. )-2q DR. SHERMAN L. BURSON~' 52 DUSTY MILLER IN , S. CHATHAM, MA 0~659 GUARD STANDING OUTSIDE OF GUARD STOP. )-26 D; WA~D 11:55~.M. D. ~ P, LAPHAM 12:15 6: ~., ? -~ ,, .',~,~.~ IN LINE 9': ~'l~ 0.~. WHEAT3N ,': ~ .~ q:l~ E. & P,, ROGLER q-18 0.1'1. WHEATON~ 2:00 ~-18 ' ' 1:~0 q-21 E. ~AGGIO ' '~ 1:~0 P.H, " " 2:}5 P.M. q-23 fl & D.',WARO "q~ 8lq0 A.M, D. WARO ,~/ g:q5 A.M. , ' ' 10:00 A.M. E. HAGG]O 10:50 A.M. H. ~ARO 11:00 A.M. ~. ~ D. ~AR =~"~ 2:~0 AS ~e~ AS EVERY SU~DAY~A:H:""s';.DEc. lgg3, JA~, FE~., APR. 199q THAT THE GATE WAS~<cLosED~AND/OR DOWN, ..... CITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF BONITA BEACH : ~' BONITA SPRINOS.~LORIDA 33959 MR. GARY FRANCO, PARKS SUPERINTENDENT DiVISiON OF PUBLIC SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3300 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD NAPLES, FLORIDA ~3999 DEAR RE: BAREFOOT BEACH STATE & COUNTY PRESERVES " GATES AT LELY DEVELOPMENT GUARDHOUSE ON LELY BOULEVARD YOUR LETTER OF JANUARY 19 MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT YOU WANTED ALL INFRACTIONS WITH REGARDS TO THE ABOVE REGISTERED WITH YOU SO THAT YOU COULD !NCLUDE A :COPY IN THE NEXT OUARTERLY REPORT. WE ARE ENC. LOSING THE FOLLOWING--A LiST OF DATES AND TIMES VARIOUS PEOPLE OBSERVED THAT THE #OWNERS" GATE AT THE LELY GUARDHOUSE WAS CLOSED (DOWN) DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT WAS BETWEEN B A.M. AND SUNSET WHEN THE PRESERVE PROPERTY WAS OPEN. [F YOU WILL REFER TO THE NOVEMBER 15, lgg LETTER FROM TRACY PETERS, PLANNER IN THE BUREAU OF LAND ~ANAGEMENT SERVICES TO SUZANNE ~ROWNLE$S~ ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THOSE INVOLVED WITH THE LELY DEVELOPMENT INSIDE OF THE LELY GUARDHOUSE, PAGE ONE PARAGRAPH TWO, "BOTH GATES MUST REMAIN OPEN" DURING OPEN HOURS AT THE PRESERVE INCLUOING THE GATE TRADITIONALLY RESERVED FOR HOMEOWNERS. THiS OF THE LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN~ PAGE 2~, WHICH WAS ACCEPTED BY A MAJORITY Of THE COLLIER COMMISSIONERS AND LATER SIGNED BY ~ WE HAVE A COPY OF Y~UR LETTER AS PARKS SUPERINTENDENT TO ~ILLIAM SMITH, PRESI')ENT OF THE BAREFOOT BEACH HOMEOWNERS ~ ASSOCIATION DATED JANUARY 2q WHICH CONFIRMS THIS TO THEM. THERE IS, HOWEVER~ COUSTANT AND. COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR THIS REOUIREMENT IN THE M~NAGEMENT PLAN WHICH MEANS THATTHEY HAVE NEVER FULFILLED THEIR REQUIREMENTS--EVEN IF IT WAS ~,~,, I.~ ONLY DOWN ONCE IT WOULD MEAN THEY WERE IN VIOLATION. ~. ALTHOUGH WE DO NOT HAVE THE GATE, MONITORED CONSTANTLY.' FROM 8 A.M. TO SUNSET (THE NUMBER OF HOURS VARYING ACCORDING/T.O THE TIME OF YEAR), THE ENCLOSED SHEET SHOWS FROM TME~:iTIME WE STARTED ANY RECORD IN JANUARY! TO DATE OF THE GATEr~BEING ;! ! :: DOWN. THE ONLY TIME IT!:GOES UP IS IF A RESIDENT~HAS IT.. "BEEPED" UP BY THE CUARD OR 'BEEPS" IT UP HI~SELF'.:FROM ~MIS CAR. PLEASE NOTE THAT OtiE,::!rpARTY HAS INDICATED EVERY A.M. THIS BEING CLOSED I$,%~THE CASE BECAUSE SHE,'r WITH REGULARITY. WE HAVE ENTERED SOME NOTES--NOT BY ANY MEANS ALL OF THEM BE'~AUSE:~ ONLY RECENTLY HAS ANYONE MADE RECORD OF THE BACK UP PROBLEH--BU~ IT HAS BEEN CONTINUAL DURING THE "TOURIST SEASON'. OUTSIDERS STOP BECAUSE THE GUARD STANDS OUTSIDE tHE GUARDHOUSE--BECAUSE THEY DO NOT REALIZE THEY DO NOT NEED -TO STOP'-THE SIGN IS THERE BUT STRANGERS MAY NOT READ IT. ADDIT'IONALLY ANY OWNER STOPPING TO CHAT WITH THE GUARDJ ANY BUSINESS GOING IN TO CALL ON AN OWNER IS STOPPED TO FIND OUT WHERE HE IS GOING (AS ARE TENTATIVE BUYERS) AND THIS HOLDS UP ALL TRAFFIC BEHIND THAT CAR WHO ARE GOING TO THE BEACH.~ THIS IS NOT THE INTENT OF THE AGREEMENT AS EMAC APPROVED IT AND THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET SIGNED. ADDITIONALLY ~ LETTER DATED ~PRIL ~ SIGNED BY EDITH AND PAUL ~OGLER IS ENCLOSED REGISTERING THEIR COMPLAINT. AS ~EFERREO TO IN THE RUNK!NG RECORD OF GATE BEING DOWN~ A COPY OF THE EXPLANATION IN THE HAND OF J. PEPPER IS ENCLOSED COVERING MAR~H 10 AND ~PRIL 15--WE HAVE THE ORIGINAL. THESE ARE BUT A SMALL PORTION OF COMPLAINTS RECEIVED--MOST ~EOPLE DO NOT REALIZE THEIR RIGHTS ARE BEING INFRINGED UPONJ AND IF THEY DO THEY WILL TELEPHONE OR COMPLAIN TO A FRIEND. A COPY OF THE BONITA BANNER ARTICLE OF APRIL l? IS ENCLOSED. PLEASE NOTE THAT DESPITE WHAT YOU HAVE ADVISED TO THE HOMEOWNER'S .AssOCIATION AND. WHAT HAS BEEN ADVISED TO THEM VIA TRACY PETERS, THE HOMEOWNER'S PRESIDENT IS STATING THAT THE "OPEN-GATE RULES ARE A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION. UNFORTUNATELY THEIR INTERPRETATION AND WHAT IS WRITTEN IN PLAIN ENGLISH IN THE LMAC AGREEMENT IS APPARENTLY A MATTER OF ENFORCEMENT OF THE AGREEMENT~-AND TRAFFIC DOES BACK UP ESPECIALLY DURING TOURIST SEASON. ~E ARE NOT MANUFACTURING ~ INCIDENTS--WE HAVE MUCH BETTER THINGS TO DO WITH OUR TIME. ~E ASK ONLY THAT RULES BE FOLLOWED AND THE PUBLIC BE RESPECTED. VERY TRULY YOURS~ :,~ MFW/DWW:Mw MARJORIE F. WARD ENC. PRESIDENT DAVID W. WARD VICE PRESIDENT P. S. COPY OF LETTER FROM DAVID A: ZACZEK IS ALSO ENCLOSED. April 13. ~994 On Saturday Harch 5 .bou~ 2,30':p.m. ~e ~'en: Beach P=eserve. As ~'e turned off of Beach Road into ~he Barefoo~ developmen[, the guart ag ghe ga,re ~as saying [o ~he four cars ahead of us "T~e gate is~ closed. There left in the Par~. Th,~re is no place to park." The cars ahead of us turned a-ound and left. We told the guard we wan%ed :o drive throuf, h and have~ a look. When we go~ into ~he par~ Ke counted 25 empty par~ing spaces in the parring ~ot and along the road. · we feel very strongl} tha~ the ~guard at the gate has no r~ght ~o tell people not to go bac~ ~o the par~ under any CirCUmstances. Hopefully this infringemen~ cn our rights wi] i be corrected. Sincerely '.'curs,, /, / /. Efft~h anO rauURogle~ 25741 Dande~[on Bonita Springs, FL 33923 (813) 992-0fi12 ER:m On Friday, October 22, 793 a:?l:68~'p.m whlle drivin.~ co [.ely Bare/oo: Beach Preserve I was~sCopp~d ac Lite security booLh. Tile security o££lcer asked ~,o vhere I vas going and I replied "I am going co the beach." A~: chat time I asked why I was slopped and the "' security o££1cer repliel, "you looked like a common laborer." asked ii I had co whe-e a sutc and tie-to go :o :he beach. Then I in£ormed che secur£ry o:'£1ce char according co :he governor and sc,ace legislaEure I I~ave unin~ecrup~ed access :o ~l~e beach. The security officer rudely replied t'ha: "I read the newspaper also". AS a tax payer in the S:a:e of Florida I do no: belLeve chat ! should have ro b_; subjected co this abuse by the securir, y officer, Lely Beach Development or thu Lely Beach Ilomeownors /,ssocia:ion. David A. Zaczek 27239 Ps,rick Stree~ Bonita Springs, FL 339g* BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE GATES AT GUARDHOUSE ' l 0WNER~S' GATE CLOSED/DOWN '_~=~ 199q WHO REPORTED I COMMENTS. TIM~ 6-50 M,WARD SIGN~'ON GITE READS "GATE 1:35 PM CLOSES AUTOMATICALI.Y ~FTER EACH VEHICLE' lO:10 AM ~'2 ~.WARD ~ 10:20 AM ' 10:~S AM 7-q D,WARD VERY FEW PEOPLE'AT BEACH-- 7:15 PM LEAST EVER SEEN ON qTH OF JULY- WEATHER CLEAR ?-6 D,WARD ~:50 PM 5:30 PM ?-? M,/WARD FEDERAL EXPRESS TRt'CK iN 11:15 AM BEACH LANE @ ii:IS TALKING Il:30 AM TO GUARD ~ HOLD~NG UP CAR FOR R.MIKTUK l:00 PM ~:~0 PM q:00 PM 6:00 PM 7-15 M,WARD NEW SiGN ''' ~:30 PM q:00 PM 7-16 C.RENNER 8:10 AM W, RENNER D.WARD Il:30 AM 1:00 PM 7-1g J, PEPPER ALWAYS DOWN 6:00 PM 7:00 PM ~'~ 7-21 J, PEPPER g:O0 AM ~' 7-22 J. PEPPER ~:00 AM 9:~5 AM 7-~3 C, RENNER 7:lq PM =. W, RENNER 7-2g ¢. RENNER 7:30 PM W, RENNER BEACH GATE ALSO DOWN ?-30 C, RENNER ~:25 PM W, RENNER C, RENNER q:q5 PM W. RENNER 8-1 M. WARD 8:00 AM D, WARD 8|10 AM M. WARD 1:25 PM D, WARD 1:50 PM 8-3 M, WARD 2:25 PM ~-~ 5:00 P~ ~ ' 8-5 R. WARD 5:~0 P~ D; WARU ~ '~ ::WARD ,- 2.05 PM...~ FOR:PASS $-11 R. ~IKTUK ~ ~:00 PM .. 8-15 C. RENNER : i q:19 PM ~ 11:55 AM ~,, 8-19 M, WARD · 8-20 M. WARD ' ?:00 PM D. WARD 8-21 E. MAGGIO 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 8-26 M. WARD D. WARD ' 10:q5 AM 8-27 M. WARD 2:00 PM D. WARD 5:00 P~ 8-~1 M. WARD 6:15 Pm D. WARD D. LAPHAM ' : P. LAPHAH 9-5 D. WARD ' 5:00 PH 9-8 D WARD il:iS AM , ' 9-10 M WARD ' 6:00 PM D WARD D LAPHAM P LAPHAM 9-16 D WARD ~'00 PM 8:00 AM g'17 M. WARD 8:15 AM D. WARD 10:00 AM ~:~ 11:15 AM 12:05 PM 2:15 P~ M. WARD 2:10 PM g-21 M. WARD Il:05 AM Il:20 AM g-2q M. WARD lO:12 AM 1~ :20 AM 10 :~ AM 10:~5 AM M. WARD 6:15 PM D. WAR~ D. LAPHAM ~" P. LAPHAM 9-~5 J. PEPPER 2 CARS ~N BEACH LINE--~RD CAR 1:~0 PM A. PEPPER @ OWNERS GATE WHO BACKED UP TO JOIN OTHER 2 CARS 5:50 PM 9-26 M. WARD ~:05 PM 5:20 PM 9-27 M. WARD q:00 PM q:~0 PM CITIZENS ASSOCIATION,OF BONITA BEACH ~ C A B B ~,," · P.O. BOX ~821 ~",~ ~ BONITA SPRINGS. F'I.X~RIDA 33~59 '.~ 0CTOBE,: 15, 199q . . . M/S TRACY PETERS, PLAN~ER 't'~;~' M/S DAWN GRiFFiN, PLANNER '" DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION :~ DIvisiON OF STATE LAND~ 3900 COMMONWEALTH BOULEVARD · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 3'?399-3000 DEAR M/S PETERS AND GR~FFIN: RE: BAREFOOT BEACH PRESERVE, COLLIER COUNYY, FLORIDA THiS iS BEING ADDRESSE3 TO BOTH OF YOU LADIES SINCE WE ARE NOT SURE WHICH ONE/DA BOTH OF YOU ARE R!!SPONSIBLE FOR THiS PROJECT. ~;~, ~E APOLOGIZE FOR BEIN.~ LATE WITH THE QUARTERLY REPORT WHICH ' WAS DUE SEPTEMBER 30 B'.IT BECAUSE OF THE F'ECENT CIRCUMSTANCES ON THIS SUBJECT WE HA~ DELAYED REPORTING TO BE ABLE TO' SEND : - NEWSPAPER COVERAGE AS '~ELL AS.THEi. REPORT. A COP~ IS BEING SENT TO GARY FRANCO, P~RKS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE DIVISION OF · PUBLIC SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATIOn. DEPARTMENT OF THE COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNM!NT RATHER THAN SE~.OING IT TO HIM AND THE NEED FOR HIM TO ~ORWARD ON !TO YOU. SINCE WE ARE LATE, }~ ' WE FELT THIS EXPEDITED THE MATTER. AS OUR ASSOCIATION, CA,B, WHOM WE REPRESENT, HAS DONE OVER THE FIRST TWO QUARTERLY REPORT PERIODS OF l§Bq, WE INCLOSE A ~ LIST OF DATES, TIMES~ AND COMMENTS (IF ANY) THATyWERE ..... ;' REPORTED TO US WHEN IT WAS OBSERVED BY *RESIDENTS THAT THE 'OWNERS' GATE WAS CLOSED (IN THE DOWN POSITION). ~E SHOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT WE HAVE HAD COMMENTS KROM SEVERAL PEOPLE THAT INSTEAD OF KEEPING TRACK OF SAYING IT WAS ~DOWN ACTUALLY THEY HAVE ~IEVER SEEN IT '~UP"--NAMES SUCH AS J. PEPPER AND S. ZWOLINSKI FOR BEGINNERS. FOLLOWING YOUR SEPTEM~ER 15 LMAC MEETIt~b, THIS ISSUE WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE COL(.IER COUNTY COMMISSIO~ ON SEPTEMBER- ~0 AND THEN POSTPONED BY THEM FOR A FULl PUBLIC ~EARING: ON OCTOBER q. IN EVENT YOU HAVE NOT ;EEN THE PRESS COVERAGE OF THE OCTOBER~ :* OF OCTOBER ~ AS YELL AS THE NAPLES DALLY S OF DATE. ALSO ENCLOSED IS THE. NE~S PRESS A~TICLE OF OCTOBER~ ~THE DAY PRIOR TO THE '-MEETING~ TH~ HOMEOWNERS . ADVERTISEMENT AS IT APPEARED IN BOTH THE BONITA BAN~ THE NAPLES DAILY NEWS ON OCTOBER Z AND ~ PUBLIC FORUM LETTER TO EDITOR BONITA BANNER OF OCTOBER 1. SUBSEQUENT ARTICLES APPEARING IN THE BON!TA BANNER OCTOBER 8, EDITORIAL NAPLES DAILY NEWS OCTOBER 6' BONITA BANNER 'JCTOBER 15 AND NEWS PRESS OCTOBER 15. WE ARE ALSO ENCLOSING AN OLDER ARTICLE AFRIL 30, 199q BONITA BANNER IN WHICH RICHAhD TIMBERS, THEN FRESIDENT OF THE LELY BAREFOOT BEACH MASTER ASSOCIATION IS QUOTED (AS MARKED) WITH THE SAME STATEMENTS HE REITERATED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 4 BEFORE THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSION. WE TRUST THAT SOME OF THE INPUT FROM THE LOCAL LEVEL WILL BE AND BECOME A PART OF YOUR FILES. THANK YOU ON OF INTEREST BEHALF OF NOT JUST THE MEMBERS OF OUR ASSOCIATION BUT 10 MORE LOCAL ASSOCIATIONS AND THE BEACHGOING PUBLIC WHO ARE IN AGREEMENT ON THIS SITUATION. VERY TRULY YOURS~ MFW MARJORIE F. WARD ENCS. PRESIDENT DAVID '~. WARD CC G. FRANCO, PARKS SU~T. VICE PRESIDENT DIV. PUBLIC SERVICES PARKS/REc DEPT. COLLIER Co. C.A.B.B. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ~'~ June 21, 1994 The State. of Florida To Whom it May Concern; For many years my family and I have driven down ~ol~]ta Beach Road noticing the guard gate to Barefoot B~ach t'r~2s~rve. It was only last week t~']t we learned from ~ fr~.;~d that guard gate was on publi,.' property, and tha' w~ ~_'~I~ access Barefoot Beach, after s~;opping at the guar] ga[e, that indeed was public access to our state park. For years we believed that this was a priv~te ~.,:~ 'n, ~ot be accessed by the public, as the guard hob, se ::~ '/c.r5' intimidating. Barefoot Beach ~s beautiful ano should be ';ept .~[~,)t~ ~o public ~n an inviting m,~nner. 'i'l~e state s:tould :,reserve this right for the people. Sincerely, Terri St Cerny 8280 Casa Del Rio Ft. Myers, FL 33919 August 5th, 1993 To Whom it May Concern:! This letter is in response to the current controversy regarding the gatehouseiat Lely Barefoot Beach In February 1992, I hadlarranged to meet friends from out of state at the Barefoot Beach preserve. When I arrived, I was stopped by a guard and told I would not be.allowed to enter because the parking .area was full. Needing to inform my friends of the situation and being told I was not going to be allowed to do so, I exchanged alfew heated words with the guard and was eventually allowed to enter. I was informed by this guard that if I was not out in 5 minutes, he would personally come looking for me. Once inside the park entrance, I counted seventeen empty parking spaces. Needless to say, I parked and stayed for lunch with my friends. Upon leaving, spoke to the guards supervisor and was told that she found my story hard to believe, as she had never had this complaint before. Obviously, this situation had occured before and continued even after my lexperi.ence. I find the way that I was treated totally unacceptable and hope this letter will help in exposing this authoritarian and uncalled for behavior. The beaches of this state are the reason people from all over the United States and the world arrive here to spend money and support our economy. The day we restrict beach access is the day we restrict tourism growth in the state. Sincerely, Larry Glen Burns 18224 Matanzas Rd. Fort Myers, FL 33912 (813) 267-6780 " · July 15, 1993 TO whom it may concern: 'lit This letter concerning Lely b~l'e£oot Beach i'r<.serve, .shouldn't have to been written, if Lely Corp. was ...honest'with it's house buyers-~fid the general public. fl-tO Florida in 1977. Shortly after: my daughter to--t.~ J.gb at Lely. Atwhichtime they only had 4 homes to sell. Her job as a-'Watchman was 'not to let ~nyone in unless they were interested in buying one .of the homes. They told her that there was a public .beach behind them, but not to let the public know or ~llow them to use it. She then met a salesman from :he. Lely. Corp. named Steve~. Steve ~ ame over to our home £or a Sunday dinner. And he also us that there was a public beach in the back of ly, and not to let the public know about ~t. He told ~..he didn't.know how the Bely Corp. could keep '-. ret-and.-s~le~the houses without-the buyers ig .... He. said, "The homes: will not sell i~' the-. [.about.the public beach behind them." Shortly ~ter he moved away. Sothere you go! Lely Corp has ~ 6~en lying to the people'sayinglit was private and ha~e __ kept the public out forYeers~ before they were exPoged. -*I was also turned away from the guard at the guardhouse. ..... The guard told me it was private, and I was not allowed to enter. How many years have they been getting away .with it???? And now they want us to stop and tell theD% .where we are going??? And they can decide if they wish let us in or not?????? What a joke???? Enough thi~ baloney from the Lely~C~rp If I want baloney ~-'-wi-ll go to the supermarket and buy some!!!! with the guardhouse and the gate, NOWI! Lloyd'Selden~ 26778 Lost Woods Circle Bonita Springs, Florida ~.S. They should be fined for all the years they have kept the general public out! Enough is Enough, or does big money count more. I shal~ wait ;~nd s~*~~! ! ClTIT~..N$ AS.~OCIATION OF BONIT ~, BP. ACH CABB P.O, BOX 1821 BONIT'~, SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33~ o9 '" PARKS & RECREATION DEI'ARTMENT - '~' 3300 SANTA BARBARA BOIILEVARD DEAR ~IR; FRANCO: RE BAREFOOT BEACH STATE & COUNTY PRESERVES GATES AT LELY DEVELOPMENT GUARDHOUSE ON LELY BOULEVARD ~ NOT KNOWING EXACTLY WHEN THE , QUARTER ':OR YOU TO REGISTER [ INFRACTIONS WITH THE ~TATE ON THE ABOVE, OUR LETTER OF APRIL ;i ~ COVERED THE MON'-'~ OF APRIL WH1Ct SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THIS QUAA~'TER. ~ THE ATTACHED LIST OF REPORTED TIMES THIT THE "OWNERS" GATE I WAS DOWN (CLOSED) t'HEN IN FACT ACC)RDING TO THE LAND ~': ~ ~ANAGEMENT ACQUISTION COMMITTEE PLAN AS APPROVED BY THE ' COLLIER COMMISSIONERS AND THEN', BY THE ~OVERNOR AND CABINET ~ SHOULD BE UP FROM B A.M. TO SUNSET WHI :,~ IS ATTACHED COVERS ( MAY AND JUNE TO DATE. THERE WERE 2~l SUCH COM/AENTS MADE FOR ~ APRIL, OBVIOUSLY WI"H THE TOURIST SEASON OVER, THE NUMBER OF CHECKS WE HAVE MADE HAVE BEEN LESSE~, HOWEVER~ YOU WILL m i NOTE THAT THE GATE IS STILL #DOWN" (CLOSED TO USAGE BY THE · . PUBLIC) WHEN IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE UP. ~.~ THE REPORTS FROM ~/. RENNER AND D. LAPH/.'I WERE SUBSTANTIATED IN WRITING, COPIES O~ WHICH ARE ATTA¢:AED. ]'HE REST WERE GIVEN TO US VERBALLY, 8UT CAN ALL BE VER:/IED IF NEED BE. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ACCESSED THE PRE'.'ERVE ON MEMORIAL DAY ' JUST TO CHECK AND FOUND THAT BETWEEN AND .~:~.0 P.M. WHEN THE OVERFLOW FROM TH',' COLLIER BAREFO0~ BEACH PARK WHICH j ABUTTS BONITA BEACH .'ARK AND BONITA BFACH PARK AND ALL OF · '. ITS 10 ACCESSES WERE . ULL TO OVERFLOWING. THERE WAS 30 EMPTY " PARKING SPACES INSID~ OF THE BAREFOOT B:'ACH STATE AND COUNI'Y '" PARKS. UPON LEAVING "E NOTICED A COLLI'R COUNTY RANGER 'gAS DIRECTING PEOPLE NOT TO GO INTO THE "AREFOOT BEACH PARK BECAUSE OF 1TS CONDITiON~ HOWEVER, IT ;LID NOT SEEM THAT HE WAS DIRECTING THEM INTO THE PRESERVI: WHERE THERE WAS AVAILABLE PARKING. '!E CALLED THIS TO ~IS ATTENTION BECAUSE THIS IS ONE OF THE HE,tVIEST USED BEACH D,'YS OF THE YEAR. .i WE HAVE NOTED THAT IN YOUR APRIL' 18 LE'TER TO ]'RACY 'PETERS [~/i ,~ OF LP1AC THAT YOU IN)ICATED ONLY RECEIVING ONE LETT'ER OF ':" ';! ~CoOMPLAINT WHIC, WA$ '.RO, U~, 0U'R APRIL ~ , [; l!~''"J' RWARDED AFTERTHEFACl SINC *, . .LETTER, .WHICH YOU. OFF DATE FOR THE O~ARTER~ ~HAD ATTACHEt) ~ SPECIFIC LETTERS PLUS A CHART LIKE ';,.IR~ ONE ENCLOSED. '[HE LETTER I'~AY ONLY COME FROM US aU[ THE PdBLIC PRgVIDES US WIIH THF INFORMATION''IT IS N. 1" J~UST A ,ONE PERSON CAMPAIGN, WE UNDERSTAND YOUR DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVING MANY LETTERS OF COMPLAINT PROM' RESIDENTS WH( LIV~ INSIDE THE GAiF WHEREIN THEY ARE REIJUESTING '~'~EES" ON THE BEACH AND "CONTROL OF TH~ PARKING AT TH~JR~GuARDHOUSE". ~(NOWING THAT YOU WILL FORWARD A COPY OF THIS LETTER~ TO ~/S ~ETERS IN JALLAHASSEE, WE WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT T~AT ON JUNE ~O AT THE COLLIER COUNTY ~UDGET H~.ARING MEETINGS~, THERE WAS A CONSENSUS OF TO [ OPPOSED TO IMPOSING PARKING FEEl AT THIS TIME BECAUSE IT IS NOT ECONOMICALLY~FEASIBLE NOW AN[, WAS NOT 2 YEARS AGO WHEN THE MORITORIUM WAS PROPOSED. ~E SHOULD ALSO LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT IT WAS DECIDED~BY THE COMMISSION, BY THE LMAC MEETING IN TALLAHA~SEE AND ~AGREED PY THE GOVERNOP AND CABINET IN THE MANAGEMENT PdAN THAT NO CONTROL OF THE PARKING LOT NOR THE ~AREFOOT ~EACP PRESERVE PROPERTY BELONGING ro THE STALE SHOULD BE AOMINI.~TERED FROM GUARDHOUSE NOR IN tHE HANDS OF ANYOkE BUI ~,OLL IER COUNT/ PARK PERSONNEL AT TH~ ENTRANCE "TO THE P~ESERVE PROPERTY. THE PEOPLE ALREADY IImSIDE THE GATE WHO DO NOT HAVE IN TO THE GUARDHOUSZ WHEN THEY WANT TO GO TO THE PRESERVE CAN OF COURSE ACCES:' IT AT WILL SINCE THEY ARE I;4SIDE INTO THE HANDS OF THEIR PRIVATE EMPLOY;:ES AS A MEANS TO KEEP THE GENERAL PUBLIC OUT OF ~THE PRESERVE LAND (THEREBY GUARANTEEING IT FOR THEMSELVES). THIS IS NEITHER PAIR, NOR RIGHT, NOR LEGAL ACCORDING TO ~THE PLAN IN FORCE. WE FURTHER "FORM" LETTERS WHICH HARDLY REPRESENT INDIVIDUAL THINKING--JUST THAT WHICH,THEY ~ARE DIRECTED TO DO AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS SUCh AND DISCOUNTED ACCORDINGLY. WI MAY BE ONLY ONE REPORTING'~IN FROM THE PUBLIC'S POINT OF VIEw BUT WE ARE LOOKED UPON BY THE P':t~LIC AS REPRESENFING THEIR INTERESTS, AND 'HAT IS EXACTLY WH~T WE :'ROPOSE TO ~. VERY TRULv ~OURS, MFW MARJ~)RIE F. WARD ENCS. P~E)S I DEN T ~AV~D ~. WARD VICE PRESIDENT "0WNERS'~ )AT[J~LOS ~/DOWN 199q WHO REPORTED 5-12 L BENNETT " .... ~? ,:,,.. 8:15 A.U. " ;J. sc 0L .us--now. IM~EDIATEL~ AFTER 8:50 A.~. ~"~ 5-[9 W. RENNER 6:~0 P.M, 5-25 g. ~ lO:q5 ~.~. ~) , 1:25 ~.~. '¥" 5-2q J. & T. BRENNAN 9:00 ~ ~, ~: 9:~0 A.~. .%il : ~ 5-)0 'M. & D. WA~D 1:00 P.~. ' 2:00 P.R. .~ " 2:20 P... m, ~ 5-31 W.RENNER 6:q5 P.M. ~ , 6-3 M. & D. WARD 1:00 P.M. l:10 P.M. 6-11 D. LAPHA~ .... i 6:10 P.M. 6-16 W. RENNER "OWNER' GATE UP FOR ONE 9:00 A.M. RESIDENT & ~CLOSED AT ONCE 6-17 M. g D. WARD 12:q5 ~ 1:00 P.M. " 1:20 P.M. m (m~,~ " ~:1o P.M. :)301 £a~t Tam]amITra~l · ~ ~ Florida 3~962-4977 John ~ Hgrris (9~1~774-3602 ~mo~y L. H~nc~ ~CP ' DisUi~ 2 ~mo~y ~, Cons~n~ne Dis~i~ 5 Bonka Sp~gs, Florida 33959 Ko: Yo~ IcHor d~ted April 22, 1996 De~ ~oHo ~d David: As you ~ow, ~ p~pos~ ~m Bill F"mn~ on b~f of ~ wns ~ ~d not h:~d b~ ~ Bo~d of C0~ mc d~vclopm~t doc~m ~ow fo~'a g~eho~,~ ~ Tract A of ~'~l~ B~foot "~" Beach P~. o.~g ~o~ ~ ~ Lely B~cfoot Beach ~ ~ ~compro~g s~d~d of access cqud to all ofl~r p~ in Collier Co~. I ~ you ~d ~ m:mbc~ of C~B for yo~ cffo~s ~d c~c~l ~iderafioa of ~cse SMc~ly, T~omy ~mcock, ~CP Vice ~.-I-2.B (inal. udJ.n~ l:h~Ls Iii111111111111111111111111111!11111111111111111111111111111111 Oc~obe~ 2, 1998 Naploo Daily Now~ 1075 Con~ral AvenUe Naplem, Florida 34102 Roz ~egal Adver=iling for Pe=i=lonm A-98-40 PUD-98-11, V-98-80 V-98-180 and SV-98-2 Dear Judi: Please 'kill" the above-referenced adl which wore all to bo run in ~-h'~--~tobor 110 1998 odi=ion of tho paper. Thole pe%itionl will bo advertised ~or a mooting in November and new letter, and noticea will be ~orthcoming. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellle Hoffman, Depu~:y Clerk October 2, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: PUD-98-11 Tamiami Professional Center Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Purchase No. 804611 12B1 October 2, 1998 Robert L. Duane, AICP Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. 715--10th Street South Naples, FL 34102 Re: R~FISED Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-98-11, Tamiami Professional Center Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998 as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 2, 1998 Mr. Steve Houston 1369 South Downing Street Denver, Colorado 80210 Re: REVISED Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-98-11, Tamiami Professional Center Dear Petitioner; Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998 as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 1998 TO: Maureen Kenyon, Supervisor Clerk of Courls FROM: Vincent A. Caut~lCP, Administrator Communit~ Development and Environmental Services SUBJECT: Request for Legal Advertising of Public Hearings This memorandum aerve.s as a request to readverllse the following petitions for the November 10, 1998 me(ting of the Board of County Commissioners. The petitions were originally advertise,;I for the October 27, 1998 but as that meeting has been canceled, it is necessary to readvertise for November 10, 1998. V-98-18 SV-98-2 A-98-4 PUDo98.11 V-98-.8 Thank you for your attention to this matter and please feel free to call upon me or my staff If we can be of assl ~tance. xc: Bob Mulhera, AICP, Planning Services Director Cecilia Madln, PJ~,nning Technician J OF PAGES lllllillllllilllllilillil[lillllllllllllliliililllilillll, iillll, TOt MR. 31HJl~ll lq~u&flil r , - . ~ ~-/~ ¢ .~-~-//, ~ilillillllllllillllliliillililiilllliiliiil'iiilliiiiiillliiilil 12BI Collier County, Florida 11/28/84-$50 :iiiiiii::i:' '" 111111111'1121111111111;12"222'2111212; .......... .... ii:;; ............................................................ ~S£gn ~l~tly I Name & Address of any person(s} to be notified by Clerk's Office: .......... i7~';~ .............. · - · P y mportant / /, -- /XXXX/ Naples Daily News or legally requlred ? /} / ? ' Other for advertising costs: i13-1383~-649110 .................. ~ ............................... ~....~9.~.;~ ....................................... D~ o~ ~ ~ ~l,~l. 12B1,14 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10,1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ?~ICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 8515S; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A" AGRICULTURE AND "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS TAMIAMI PROFESSIONAL CENTER FOR OFFICE, COMMERCIAL AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S. 41, IN SECTION 15, TOV~SHIP 48 SOUTH, P~XNGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.6 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a sFokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDI~:ANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH iNCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 8515S; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A" AGRICULTURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS TAMIAMI PROFESSIONAL CENTER FOR OFFICE, COMMERCIAL AND AN ASSISTED LiViNG FACILITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S. 41, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.6 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert Duane of Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., representing Steve Houston, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board c;f County Co~w, issioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification o£ the herein described real property located in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, ~!orida, is changed from "A" ATricu!ture tc "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accoroance with the Tamiami Professional Center PUD Document, =ttached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 8515S, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ., 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency 'Ma~rie M. Student Assistant County Attorney TAMIAMI PROFESSIONAl, CENTER PLANNEI) UNIT DEVELOI'MENT Prepared for: itole, Montes and Associates, Inc. Prepared by: Ilolc, Montes and Associates, Inc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, Florida 34102 (941) 262 - 4617 lIMA File No. 98.61 Juls'. 1998 l)me Filed: Date Review by (.:CPC: Date Approved by BCC: Ordinance No: EXHIBIT "A" 1281, TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STATEMENT OF COMPI,IANCE Ii PROPERTY OWNERSIIIP, I.EGAL DESCRIIrI*ION AND SHORT TITLE, AND UNIFIED CONTROL Ill STATEMENT OF INTF~NT AND PROJECT I)I.~SCRIP'I'ION IV GENEIkAL DEVELOPMt£NT RF. GULATIONS V PERMITTED USES & I)IMENSIONAL STANI)ARDS VI ENVIRONMENTAl. STANDARDS VII TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS VIII ENGINEERING AND UTII.ITIES RI.;QUIRIiMF. NTS IX WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS LIST OF EXIIIBITS EXItlBIT A. - CONCEPTUAl, PUl) MASTER PI,/\N SECTION I S'I'ATI:.MI~.N'I' OF ('()MI'I.IANCI,7 Tbe development of 11.57 acres of property in Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East, as a Planned Unit Development, to be known as the Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development, is in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of the Collier County Growth Management Plan based upon the following reasons: I. 1 The subject property is h)catcd in an area idcatilicd as a Mixed l Jsc Urban Residential in the Future l,and t lse I~icmcnt of the Growlh Management l'hm fi,r Collier Couaty. 1.2 Thc project is consistcnt with the provisions ol'Commercial Under Criteria ofthe 1989 Growth Management Plan and may also be fi)und consistent with thc prop~)sed Commercial and Office Intill Subdistrict of the Furore l,and Usc Element of Ordinance 97-67, not yet adopted at the time ofapplicalion fi~r this Planned Unit Development. 1.3 The project development is planned to incorporate nataral systems, cxistiag and manmade, for water management in accordance with their natural ftmctions and capabilities. 1.4 The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Collier Growth Management Plan. 1,$ Thc project will be served by a complete range .l'serviccs and utilities as approved by the Couuty. 1.6 Thc project is compatible with adjacent hind uses through the internal arrangement of structures, the placement of land use buffers, and the proposed development standards contained herein. 1.7 The Planned Unit Development includes open spaces and natural features which are preserved from future development in order to enhance their natural functions and to scrvc as a project amenity. 1.8 All final local Development Orders for this projcct are subject to ~ac Collier County Concurrency Management System, as implemented by the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. 1.9 The proposed plan is consistent with Policy 5.8 of the Collier County Growth Management Plan which permits care lhcilitics within thc Urban Designated Area subject to regulations contained in the I,DC with which the subject property fully complies. SECTION 11 PROPERTY OWNERSIIIP, LEGAl, DESCRIPTION AND SHORT TITLE AND UNIFIED CONTROl. 2.1 Property Ownership: The subject property is under contract For purchase to I lole. Montes and Associates and presently in the ownership oF: Steve Houston 1369 South Downing Street Denver, Colorado 80210 2.2 Legal De~;cription: The south 200 feet of the southwest ¼ of Section 15, Township 48S, Range 25 E of Collier County Florida, less U.S. Highway No. 41 (State Road No. 45). 2.3 Short Title: This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance". 2.4 Statement of Unified Control: It is the intent of Hole, Montes and Associalcs, tnc., to establish a Planned Unit Development on I 1.57 acres in Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The subject property is under unified control and ownership for the purpose of obtaining PUD zoning. 2.5 Physical Desefimion: The subject property is long and narrow, 200 x 2520, and is located just to the south of Imperial Golf Estates and north of Collier Reserve, and on the east side of U.S. 41. Soils for the subject property include seven (7) lmmokalee Fine Sand, seventeen (17) Basinger Fine Sand, and thirty-nine (39) Satellite Fine Sand. The site drains into Horse Creek and the Hor~ Creek flowway will be maintained after development. Water quality treatment will be directed to grassed swales and detention areas prior to discharge into Horse Creek. 2- I -~4 SECTION 111 STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJI£CT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Intr~uction: It is thc intent of thc dcvelopcr to establish a Planned Unit Devclopmcnt mccting the requirements ms set forth in the Collier County Imnd Development Code (LDC). Thc purpose of this documcnt is to set forth guidelines, for the furore development of thc project, that mect acccptcd planning principlcs and practices, and to implcmcnt the Collier County Growth Managcmcnt Plan. 3.2 Proiect Description: The project is compriscd of about I 1.57 acres and is located 580 fi:ct south of Imperial GolfCoarse Blvd. on the east sidc of U.S. 41 in Secfon 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Access to thc project is provided by a connection onto U.S. 41 and shared access is contemplated with thc adjacent property to thc north, which will provide access to the three (3) tracts which are proposed for development. The project is intended to support a selected range of retail and office uses on 1.97 acres, and an Assisted Living Facility on 5.52 acres to meet thc needs of thc surrounding community. 3.3 Land Use Plan and Proiect Phasing: A, The PUD Master Plan contains a total ofsix (6) tracts consisting of three (3) development areas, two (2) Conservation Areas and roadway area and are noted as follows: TABLE ~ Tract I I Retail 0.91 Tract II Office 1.06 Tract 11I A.L.F. 5.52 Conservation Area I Preserve 2.31 Conservation Area II Preserve 0.22 Tract R Roadway 1.55 The Master Plan is designed to be flexible with the placement of buildings, related utilities and water management facilities to be determined at the time of site development plan and permitting approval, based on compliance with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance, LDC and local, state and federal permitting requirements. All tracts may be combined or developed separately 3-1 subject to compliance with the applicable dimensional requirements contained within this document. Final lot configuration will be determined during the Preliminary Subdivision Plat review process. B. The anticipated time of build-out of the projcct is approximately three (3) years beginning in 1999. SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGUI.ATIONS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development regtflations to be applied to the development and use of the Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development and Master Plan. 4.1 General: The following are general provisions applicable to the PUD Master Plan: A. Regulations tbr development of the Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, lhe PUD- Planned Unit l)evelopment District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. Should these regulations fail to provide specific developmental slandards, then the provisions of the most similar zoning district in the Collier County I.I)C shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions ofall terms shall be thc same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development shall become pan of the regulations which govern the manner in which this site may be developed. D. All tracts identilied on the PUD Master Plan may be used for water management purposes and parking. E. Development permitted by the approval ofthis petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15 of the LDC pertaining to Adequate Public Facilities at the earliest or next to occur ofeither final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 4.2 Site Clearin~ and Drainage: Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with the Collier County LDC and the standards and commitments of this document at the time of construction plan approval. 4-1 4.3 Easements for Utilities: Easements, where required, shall be provided for xvater management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be required by Collier County. All necessary easements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all services ami utilities to insure compliance ~vith applicable regulations in cffcct at the time construction plans and plat approvals are requested. 4.4 Amendments to the Ordinance: Amendments to this Ordinance and Master Plan shall be pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County I,DC. 4.5 Prgiect Plan Approval Requirements: Attachment "A", PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Developmcnt Plan. Subsequent to, or concurrent with. PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. All subdivision of property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC. Prior to recording of the final subdivision plat, when required by thc Subdivision Regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC, final plans of thc required improvements shall receive thc approval of all appropriate Collier County governmental agencies to ensure compliance with the PUD Master Plan, the County Subdivision Regulations and the platting laws of thc State of Florida. Prior to the issuance ora building permit or other development orders, the provisions of Section 3.3, Site Development Plans shall be applied to all platted parcels. 4.6 Sunset and MonitorinR Provisions: The Tamiami Professional Center PUD shall be subject to Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC, Time Limits for Approved PUD Master Plans and Section 2.7.3.6, Monitoring Requirements. 4.7 Pollin~, Places: Any community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility located within the Tamiami Professional Center PUD may be used for a polling place, if determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with Section 2.6.30 of the LDC. 4-2 4.8 Native Vegetation Retention Requirements: The project shall preserve native habitat, in accordance with provisions of Section 3.9.5, Vegetation Removal Protection, and Preservation Standards, ortho Collier County Land Development Code. 4.9 Common Area Maintenance: Common Area Maintenance. including the maintenance of common facilities, open spaces and the wamr management facilities shall be tbc responsibility of thc owners' association, together with any applicable permits and conditinns from applicable local, State, or Federal permitting agencies. 4.10 Landscaping Requirements: All landscaping requirements, buffers, walls, and berms shall bc developed in conformance with requirements of l)ivision 2.4 of thc Collier Cmmty I,DC pertaining to landscaping and bul'fcring: however, buffering along tJ.S. 41 at the front of thc property shall be at a twenty (20) feet minimum, and the side yard buffer requirements shall be fifteen (15) feet along the norlb and south property line lbr all tracts. Landscaping for Tracts I and II shall be ora similar plaat material and composition. 4.11 Open Space and Common Areas: Thc project shall meet or exceed thc thirty (30) pcrccut open space requirement sctforth in Section 2.6.32.3 of thc LDC with thc conservation and buffer areas depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Open space shall also include all pervious green space with development parcels and lots. 4.12 Signs: As provided for within Section 2.5, Signs, of thc Collier County I,DC. Itowcvcr, signagc for the commercial component Tracts I and Il and thc ALF. Tract III, of the project shall be unified into a common design theme. In addition. Tmcls Il and 111 shall be pcmfitted a ground sign at the U.S. 41 entrance way. 4.13 Arclfitcctural Control: All site and building design shall conlbrm to the requirements of Division 2.8 of thc Collier Co~ty LDC to insure a unified architectural design and theme; however, parking will be generally developed as depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Tract I, the retail component~of the project. 4-3 4.14 Parkin~ In accordance with thc requirements o£ Divisioa 2,3 of Ibc LI)C and Section 2.6.26.1.2.3. 4-4 SECTION V PERMII'FI£D USES AND DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5. I Purpose: The purl~:,se of this Section is to identify permitlcd uses and development standards for areas within the Tamiami Professional Ccnler I'UI) designated on Exhibit "A". PUD Master Plan for Tracts I. Il. Ill. and Conservation Areas l and Il. 5.2 General Descr~tion: Tracts l, II~ and IV, as shmvn on the PUD Master Plan, are designed to accommodate full range ofprlncipal uses. anti accessory uses. The two ('onservalion Areas are to be left in their natural slale. The acreage of the tracts, depicted on the PI .~D Master Plan. is based on conceptual designs and is approximate, Actual acreages of all development tracts ;viii be provided at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat submittal in accordance with Division 3.2 of the Collier County LDC. Ail tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, water management facilities and other similar uses. Development of retail uses, authorized ia Section 5.3 lbr Tract 1. shall not be permitted, until such time as. thc Future I.and Usc Element of Ordinance 97-67 of the Growth lvlanagement Plan providing for the Office and In-fill Subdistrict is adopted. In the interim, uses authorized by Section 2.2,12, Commercial Professional District (C- I ) and Commercial Professional Transitional District (C-IFF). of the Land Devclopn~cnt Code, as they exist as oflhe date of the approval of this PUD. shall be permitted subject to the requirement that the gross floor area of authorized office uses shall not exceed twenty- five (25.000) square feet. 5.3 Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or parl lhereof, shall be erected, altered or used. or land used, in ~vhole or part, for other than the follmving: A.) Tract~ I & II: I. All ofthe Permitted and Conditional uses in the C-I and CI.tT Zoning Districts of the LDC, in effect on the date of approval of this PUD, for Tracts I and II, excluding; homeless shelters, and soup kitchens, 2, Retail uses on Tract 1 are those permitted in the C-2 District of the LDC, in effect on the date of approval of this PUD, with thc exception orthe lbilowlng: Conditional Uses in C-2 District, gasoline service stations, and drive-in and last-Food restaurants. P..) Conservation Area I ami Il I. Permiltcd Uses for Conservation Arcns I ;md 11. depicted on I}le PUl) Master l'hm. arc limited lo boardwalks, nalur~ Irails. and similar passive SI&dc. C,) Tmcl [I1: 1. Group C~rc F~c{lilics (category ] & Il): care unils, subj~cl lo Iht provisions or Collier County I.I)C scclJon 2,2,3,3,6; nursing homcs: assisted living fiMlifics pursuant to 400.402 F,S, and Ch, ~A-J F,A.C4 and continuing care rclJrcmcnl commtmJfics pursuant Io 6~1 F,S, and 4. l&;3 F,A.(L; all subject to Collier Counly LDC Section 2,6,26, J,4 ]'c~tled Acccs~ary ~gscs anti Struclur~a ..-~lJ Tracts: l, Acccssory uses and struclorcs customarily assocJalcd wilh thc abovc pcrmJllcd uses nad slruc{tlrcs, Jnchtding vehicular garages or c.vcrcd parking, cxccpl in Conscrvalion Areas ] and Il, 2, Accessory usc, typically associated wilh AI,Fs, indudhl8 common areas Ibr rood semite, recreational oscs. atld admJnislrnlivc IhcJlJlic~, 3. Any olhcr usc which is comparable in nalttrc wilh Iht rorcgoin~ tmcs and which thc Development ScrvJccs Director determines lo bc compaliblc, Dimc~i~ ~l~dards lbr l¢cflnJttcd U~cs; ], Mi~hntan l,o[ Arcs: ]:iQccn Ihou~and (15,000J square feel. Minimum I,o1 Widih: One hundred fl 00) 3. Minimum yarc] Rcclt~ircmcnts: n. Front Yard: Sixty (60) feet Ibr Tract I kom Ibc tLS. 41 R.O.W., and Iwcnly-I~vc (2~) I~cl Ibr Tract. k,,m thc intcrnul roadway cdgc ofth~ [HIVe fllCfl[, b, ~idc Yard: f:i~ccn (1~) c. I*'.cnr Y,rd: Zcro (0) I'cot Ibr Trncl I h,¢rior In Ibc prn~cc[ nmi Iwcnly- live (25) {~Cl for '{'rtlcl Il, mcrchm~d{~c b prnhihilcd. l)cvch,pmcnl {nlcn,ily: A m;txhtunn (,[' I~l/ccn th,,,,~nnd (i5,000) SCltmrc f~=C{ (~[' r~{{iJ{ Itiily {m~ I{~VC{(~({ ~,ll '{'rilCl [, A lll{IX{Itlilll{ Itl [WcJily-~VC IL) Tr.cl l. Minimum l,ol Arch: 2, Minimu,,~ I,,I Width: 'lwn hundred 3. Mini,,m,,~ Ynrd I'rnlll Ynrd: Fifteen {,cL'c,~ drive exclusive nf pnrkin~ nrcn. inlcrnnl Side Ynrd: Twcnly.fivc (25) rcch hnwcvcr, wilh{n Ibc ~{dc ynrd tony hc pcrmJllcd WJlhin I]llccn (15) I~cl ()f Ihc properly linc c, l(c;tr Y.rd: Twcnly-fivc (2~) feel, 4. MiIxJmun~ I JcJ~hl: Two (2) Sccdon 2,3, m~d ScclJnn 2.6,2& {,2.3 nl'lh~ I.DC, 6. liuildin~ ~ap.rnlinn: One Imlf(I/2) d~a sum of iht buildin~ hci~hls, 5.3 7, Dcvch)l)mcnt lnlcnsity: A maximum Iloor nrca redo o~,4~ is pcrmittcd fi)r Assisted l,ivin8 Facililics in accor(hmcc with thc rcqmrcmcn s of Secli~)~ 2.6.26 orthe I,DC. SECTION VI ENVIRONMENTAl. STANDARI)S The purpose of this Seclion is to set Ibrth the environmental commitments of the project developer. 6.1 Two Conservation Areas arc depicted on tile PUl} Master Plan and comprise 2.53 acres of native habitat to bc rclaincd and enhanced. 6.2 The petitioner shall he subject to tile landscaping and buffering requirements of Section 2.4 of the LDC, with expanded buffers as provided for herein in Section 4. l0 of this Ordinance 6.3 Petitioner shall be sub. jeer to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the I,I)C pertaining to archaeological resources in the event they arc identified on thc property contained in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (discovco' ora archaeological or historical site. arti fact or other indicator o f preservation). 6.4 Petitioner shall obtain and submit documentation of all necessary local, state and federal permits. 6.5 Tbe applicant shall hc sul2ject to all environmental ordinances in ertl:ct at tile time of development order approvals. 6.6 Native vegetation preservation shall conform to the requirements of Section 3.9.5.5.4 of tile Collier County LI)C and preserve areas shall be generally provided for as depicted on tile PUD Master Plan. Adjustments to the boundaries of the preservation area may be made at the time of Final Site Development ['lan Approval in accordance with the standards of Section 4.5 of this Ordinance. 6.7 An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on thc conservation/preservation areas, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction approval. 6.8 A Gopher Tortoise relocation plan shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 6.9 Petitioner shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish 8: Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) regarding potential impacts to protected wildlife species. Where protected species are observed on site, a I labitat Management Plan for those protected species shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review ,'md approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction approval. 6-1 SECTION VII TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS The purpose of this Section is m set forth the transportation commitments of the project developer. 7.1 The developer shall provide arterial street lighting of the project entrance. Said improvement shall be in place prior to the issuance of any Cerli ficate of Occupancy. 7.2 The road impact fee shall be as set forth in Ordinance 92-2. as amended, and shall be paid at the time building permits are issued, unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 7.3 Internal access improvements shall nol be subject tn impact fee credils. 7.4 All traffic control devices used shall conform with thc Manual on Unifom'~ Traffic Control Devices as required by Chapter 316.0745. Florida Statules. 7.5 Thc single project connection to U.S. 41 shall be restricted to right-in/right-out turning movements and left turning movements for southbound IJ.S. 41 traffic, per FDOT approval. 7.6 Shared access shall bc provided with tile adjacent property to tile north, provided the necessary cross-easements can be obtained. 7-1 SECTION Vlll UTII,I'I'Y AND ENGINEF. RING REQUIREMF, NTS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the utilities and engineering commitments of the project developer. 8.1 Utilities: A. Sewer anti water sen'ice shall be provided by Collier County. All pertinent requirements pertaining to thc extension and construction of ~vater distribution and sewage collection facilities shall be met. B. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmissiml and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the prqjcct are to be designed, coustructcd. conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-76. as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. C. All customers connecting to thc water distribution and sewage collection facilities to be coastructed will be customers of thc County and will be billed by thc County in accordance with the County's established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide water and/or sewer, customers shall be customers of thc interim utility established to serve the project until tile County's otr-sitc water and/or sewer facilities arc available to seine tile project. D. Appropriate casements for any project internal water improvements shall be documented on thc construction plans and shall be dedicated to tile Collier County Water-Sewer l)istrJcl. E. Construction drawings, technical spccificalions and all pertinent design information slmll be submined in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 97-017 or amendments made thereto and shall be approved prior to thc issuance of&velopment construction approval. 8.2 Eneineerinm A. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction, in accordance with the submitted plans, is granted by the Development Sen, ices Department. B. Design and construction of all improvements sball be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County I,DC. 8-1 C. Subdivision o£ thc site shall require platting in accordance with Section 3.2 o£the LDC to define the right-of-way and tracts shown on the PUD Master Plan. D. The developer and all subsequent petitloncrs shall be required to satisfy the requirements of all County ordinances or codes in effect prior to or concurrent with any subsequent development order relating to this site, including but not limited to Preliminary Subdivision Plats, Site Development Plans and any other application that will result in the issuance ora final development order. 8-2 SECTION IX WA'I'I~R MANAGEMENT RF. QIJIREMENTS The purpose of this Section is Io set forth lhe water managemenl commitments of the project developer. 9.1 Dctailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submiltcd lo thc Development Services Department for rcvicw. No construction pcrmits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction, in accordance with tile submittcd plans, is granted by the Dcvelopmcnt Services Department. 9.2 Design and construction of all improvcmcnts shall be sut~icct to compliance with lhe appropriate provisions of the Collier County I,DC 9.3 Landscaping may be placed within thc water managemcnt areas in compliance with thc criteria established wifl~in Section 2.4.7.3 of the LDC. 9-1 November 10. 1998 To: Collier County Commissioners From: Beverly C. l)avisson. I'rcsidcnt Greater hnpcrial Board Wc arc her,.: representing thc ncighl'x)rhoods o£lmperial in north Collier County. It is our understanding that the County has plans to allow thc ocw proposed development of the Tamiami Profcsslomfl Center to exit onto lmpcrlal C, olf Cour~ 1½1vd. a privately owned street. Impcrial GolrCour~ Blvd is Ibc sole entry and exit for our ncighborhoods. At present, tberc arc approximately 3,000 resident vehicles using our arc'et and the Iraffic light at thc intersection of ET 41. Plus. another 1.000 vehicles (minimum) go through the .~rvlcc gate at least twice daily. This is already avcry busy interaction and our neighborhood is yet to be c(.npleted. Preliminary plans (fill(tic Mimics .~ As.sociatcs indicate parking sr.)ts fi)r 131 vehicles for the two forward buildings and another 35 spots for Ihc assisted living cottages. With such heavy traffic hcading east and west on Ibis .~ction of Imperial Golf Cour.~ Blvd. it will become somcwhal dangerous fi)r traffic trying to turn left onto our slrect from this dcvcl.pment and thc other developments using the privale drive behind Cronin's. So far, our master association, (Greater Imperial Board), has taken care of all maintenance. resurfacing, re-striping, and repair oflmpcrial GolfCoursc 1½1vd. Our master association has handled all drainage and water problems. All lighting and land.aping and maintenance of them have been by Ibc master as.~cialion. Thc master association has had to handle thc extra co.sls of traffic from tbe Imperial PlaTa. Ibc NIlC Health Care Facility and Ibc medical building on lhe corner. By adding additional public traffic onto this private roadway, you will increase our ¢oms substanlially to continue to maintain this roadway and sur~unding area. We do nol belicUe thai prival¢ residenls should be funding and mainlaining ~ roadway for public use. We ask thai I. hc. County to. kc over responsibility for Imperial GolfCourse Bird between RT 41 and the guardhouse, and Ihal you deny further public access I. Imperial Gol£Cour~ Blvd. umil s-ch time. Thank you for your consideration. Beverly C. Davisson 13100-G7 tlamilton llarbour l)r. Naples. Florida 341 I0 Phone 594-8581 Fax 594-8175 12B1 My name is Ned Robbins I am currently the Resident Director of Park Place West in Imperial Golf Estates. Our area aborts, and will be affected by the proposed plan under consideration by the Board of Collier Count)' £'ommissioners today. We question that the property involved qualifies for identification as a multi-use PUD, We believe that the narrow 200' width of this property which has been serving as a limited water shed is insufficient to accommodate these purpo~s with the m, mber of buildings, roads, parking requirements, sidewalks and walls proposed. The impact of the figure of 108,680 square feet of impervious area, calculated at 43 % of total space.can be deceptive on a total width of 200 feet We question that the property can be utilized in the manner proposed without negative consequences. The land indicated as a conservation reserve in the plans might well be so designated as it is currently serving as is much of this land.as a water run-offarea to ttorse Creek. According to the site plan. almost one-half of the pervious land will become impervious. Further. we do not see any tinalization of the number of parking spaces. Are we to assume that approval can be granted before this designation is completed? We also believe that the drainage improvements made this year at the eastern end of PPW may be impacted by the amount ofcoverage proposed. What studies have been done to evaluate the degradation of this presumably flood control area caused by the elimination of permeable land? While others will speak to tile use of Imperial GolfCourse Blvd as an exit for the proposed entity, I wish to note here that Imperial Golf Estates has already been placed in jeopardy without adequate hurricane evacuation facilities. It has only one exit on a road that more than one night of "Mirth" rain would put under water. This is due in large part to building near the exit at the tnain gate that has taken place without due regard for water run-off Now the Commissioners are being asked to approve a change in zoning for a PUD .some 200 feet wide. As abutting property owners we believe that there is an ordinance which protects such owners from being flooded by new construction. We ask the Commissioners to thoroughly investigate the actual potential damage to us from this proposed development. Thank you. 1281 ORII~:ANCE liP. 98- 90 AN ORDiNAHCE H4EIIDING ORDI~;ANCE NUMBEP 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTy LAND DEVELOPNEIIT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZO[~ING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMEIIDIIIG THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 8515S; B'f CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIII DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A" AGRICULTU?E TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS TAMIAMI PROFESSIONAL CENTER FOR OFFICE, COMMERCIAl. AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON TNE EAST SIDE OF U.S. 41, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.6 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert Duane of Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., representinq Steve Houston, petitioned the Board of County Coramissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Co~missioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: The rgninq classification of the herein described real property !crated ir: Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Flo~'ida, is changed from "A" Agriculture to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Tamiami P~ofessionai Center PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official ZoBing Atlas Map Number 8515£, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier Cc.nt~' I ~:.d Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. ~E~T?~ TWO: This 9:dlnance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. 12B1 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier Ccunty, Florida, this /~LZ day of ~ , 1998, ,~ . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DW~G~T.E. BROCK, Clerk Attest a~ ~'Chatrm~,s s$~ature Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Ma~j~rie M. Student Assistant County Attorney -2- 1 2. B1 -i TAMIAMI PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Prepared for: tlole, Montes and Associates, Inc. Prepared by: Ilolc, Montes and Associates,/nc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, Florida 34102 (941) 262. 4617 HMA File No. 98.61 July, 1998 Revised October 1998 Date Filed: Date Review by CCPC: Date Approved by BCC: Ordinance No: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STATEMENT OF COMPI.IANCE Il PROPERTY OWNERSI liP, I.I':G,\I, I)ESCRIPTION AND SIIORT TITLE, AND UNIFIED CONTROL III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT I)ESCRIP'I'ION IV GENERAL DEVL:I,OPMENT REGULATIONS V PERMITTED USES & DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS VI ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS VII TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS VIII I'~NGINF. ERING AND UTII,ITIES REQUIREMENTS IX WATER MAN,\GISMENT REQUIREMENTS LIST OF EXItlBITS EXHIBIT A. - CONCEPTUAl. PUD MASTI-~R PLAN EXHIBIT B - LANDSCAPING AND WALI, DETAIl, CROSS SECTION FOR TRACT III NORTtt AND EAST PROPERTY LINES -- Il I I II - ' fflllllll IllllIl I I ..... ' 12B1 SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPI,IANCI'; The development of I 1.57 acres nf property in Section 15. Township 48 South, Range 25 East. as a Planned IJnit I)¢velopmcnt, lo be known as the Tamiami t'rofi:ssional Center Planned Unit Development, is in compliance with thc planning gt~als and objectives of the (Jollier County Gro,.,,lh Management Plan based upon the following reasons: 1.1 '['he subject properly is located in an area identified as a Mixed 11se Urban Residential in thc Future l,and Usc klemcnt of the Growth Management Plan for Collier County. 1.2 ]'he project is consistcnl with thc provisions of Commercial Under Criteria of Ibc 1989 Growth Management Plan and may also be found consistent with the proposed Commercial and Off]ce Infill Subdistrict of the Future l.and Usc Element of Ordinance 97-67, not .'.'et adr~ptcd at thc time of application for this Pkmned Unit Development. 1.3 The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems, existing and manmade, fi)r :vater management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities. 1.4 The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the (-;oilier Growlh Management Plan. 1.5 The project ',','ill be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approved by thc County. 1.6 'I'he project is compatible with adjacent land uses through thc internal arrangement of structures, the placement of land use buffers, and the proposed development standards contained hereto. 1.7 Thc Planned Unit I)cvclopmcnt includes open spaces and natural features which are preserved from future development in order lo enhance their natural functions and to serve as a project amenity. 1.8 All final Iocul Development Orders for this project arc sul2icct to the Collier County Concurrency Management System, as implemented by Iht Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. 1.9 Thc proposed plan is consistent with Policy 5.8 of the Collier County Growth Management Plan which permits care facilities within thc Urban Designated Area subject to regulations contained in the LDC with which tile subject property fully complies. 1-1 · ' 12B1 SECTION II PROPERTY OWNERS/lIP, LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SI IORT TFI'LE AND UNIFIED CONTROl. 2.1 Properly Ownership: The subject property is under contract for purchase to I Iole. Moutes and Associates and presently in the ownership of: Steve tlouston 1369 South Downing Street Denver, Colorado 80210 2.2 Le~,al Description: ]'he south 200 feet of the southwest 'A of Section 15, Township 48S. Range 25 E of Collier County Florida, less U.S. Ilighway No. 41 (State Road No. 45). 2.3 Short Title: This Ordinance shall be known and cited as thc "Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance". 2.4 Statement of Unified Control: It is the intent of tlole, Montes and Associates, Inc., to establish a Planned Unit Development on l 1.57 acres in Section 15, Township 48 ,";outh, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The subject property is under unified control and ownership for the purpose of obtaining PUD zoning. 2.5 Physical Description: The subject property is long and narrow. 200 x 2520, and is located just to the zouth of Imperial Golf Estates and north of Collier Reserve, and on the east side of U.S. 41. Soils for the subject properly include seven (7) Immokalee Fine Sand, seventeen (17) Basinger Fine Sand, and thin?nine (39) Satellite Fine Sand. The site drains into Horse Creek and the llorse Creek flowway will be maintained after development. Water quality treatment will be directed to grassed swales and detention areas prior to discharge into Horse Creek. 2-1 IIIII IIIII Ill I I ill llllllml 12B1 SECTION I11 STATEMF~NT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Introduction: It is the intent of the developer to establish a Planned Unit Development meeting the requirements as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The purpose of this document is to set forth guidelines, for the future development of the project, that meet accepted planning principles and practices, and to implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3.2 Proiect Description: The project is comprised of about 11.57 acres and is located 580 feet south oflmperial GolfCoursc Blvd. on thc east side of U.S. 41 in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Access to the project is provided by a connection onto U.S. 41 and shared access is contemplated with the adjacent property to the north, which will provide access to the three (3) tracts which are proposed for development. ]'he project is intended to support a selected range ot'retail and office uses on 1.97 acres, and an Assisted Living Facility on 5.52 acres to meet the needs of the surrounding community. 3.3 Land Use Plan and Proiect Phasing: A. Tile PUD Master Plan contains a total of six (6) tracts consisting of three (3) development areas, two (2) Conservation Areas and roadway area and are noted as follows: TABLE Tract l Retail 0.91 Tract 11 Office 1.06 Tract Ill A.L.F. 5.52 Conservation Area I Preserve 2.3 I Conservation Area II Preserve 0.22 Tract R Roadway 1.55-' The Master Plan is designed to be flexible xvith thc placement of buildings, related utilities and water management facilities to be determined at the time of site development plan and permitting approval, based on compliance with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance, LDC and local, state and federal permitting requirements. All tracts may be combined or developed separately 3-I t2B1 subject to compliance with the applicable dimensional requirements contained within this document. Final lot configuration will be determined during the Preliminary Subdivision Plat review process. B. The anticipated time of build-out of the project is approximately three (3) years beginning in 1999. 12B1 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGUI.ATIONS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development regulations Io be applied to the development and usc of the Tamiami Professional Center I~lanncd Unit Development and Master Plan. 4.1 General: The follov,'ing arc general provisions applicable to the PUl) Master Plan: A. Regulations tbr development ofthe Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, the PUD- Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County I,I)C in effect at the time of building permit application. Should these regulations fail to provide specific developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar zoning district in thc Collier County LDC shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as thc definitions set fi)nh in the LDC in effect at the time of buildlng permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material prcscmcd depicting restrictions for thc development ofthe Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development shall become part ofthe regulations which govern the manner in which tbls site may be developed. D. All tracts idcntified on the PUD Master Plan may be used for water management purposes and parking. l'.'. Development permitted by the approval of this petition ~vill be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15 of the LDC pertaining to Adequate Public Facilities at the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 4.2 Site Clearing and Drainage: Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall bc performed in accordance with the Collier County LDC and thc standards and commitments of this document at the time of construction plan approval. 4-1 12B1 4,3 Easements fi~r I Itilities: Easements, where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes ;ts may be required by Collier County. All necessary casements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued ~,pcr:~tlon and maintenance of all services and utilities to insure compliance with applicable regulations in effect at thc time construction plans and plat approvals are requested. 4.4 Amendments to the Ordinance: Amendments t,~ this Ordinance and Master Plan shall bc pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County LDC. 4.5 Proiec! Plan .'_'..Eproval P, cquiremcnls: Attachmcn! ",,V'. PUD Master Plan, constitutes thc required PUD Development Plan. Subsequent !o. {~r concurrent with. PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. All subdivision of property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations sc! Ibrth in Section 3.2 o£the LDC. Prior to recording of the final subdivision plat, when required by the Subdivision Regulations sc! lbrth in Section 3.2 of the LDC, final plans of the required improvements shall receive the approval ofall appropriate Collier Count)' governmental agencies to ensure compliance with the PUD Master Plan. the County Subdiviskm Regulations and the platting laws of the State of Florlda. Prior to the issuance ora building permit or other development orders, the provisions of Section 3.3. Site Development Plans shall be applied to all platted parcels. 4.6 Sunset and Monitorimz Provisions: Thc Tamiami Pr. fessional Center PUD shall be subject to Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC, 'Fime Limits fi.~r :\pproved PUD Master Plans and Section 2.7.3.6, Monitoring Requirements. 4.7 Polling Places: Any community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility located within the Tamiami Professional Center PUD may be used for a polling place, if dc!ermined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with Section 2.6.30 of the 1.DC. 4-2 12B1 4.g Native Vegetation Retention RequiremenB: The project shall preserve native habitat, in accordanc~ with provisions of Section 3.9.5, Vegetation Removal Protection, and Preservation Standards, of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4.9 Common Area Maintenance: Common Area Maintenance, including the maintenance of common facilities, open spaces and the water management facilities shall be the responsibility of the owners' association, together with any applicable permits and conditions from applicable local. State, or Federal permitting agencms. 4.10 Landscaping Requirements: All landscaping requirements, buffers, walls, and berms shall be developed in conformance with reqmrements of Division 2.4 of the Collier County LDC pertaining to landscaping and buffering; however, buffering along U.S. 41 at the front of the property shall be at a twenty (20) feet minimum, and the side yard buffer requirements shall be fifteen (15) feet along the north and south property line for all tracts. Landscaping for Tracts I and II shall be ora similar plant material and composition. Furthermore. a landscape type B buffer shall be developed in accordance with LDC requirements along the north property line in areas adjacent to the proposed office building on Tract II and an existing assisted facility located along the nbrth property line. 4.11 Open Space and Common Areas: The project shall meet or exceed the thirty (30) percent open space requirement setforth in Section 2.6.32.3 of the LDC with the conservation and buffer areas depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Open space shall also include all pervious green space with development parcels and lots. 4.12 Signs: As provided for within Section 2.5, Signs, of the Collier County LDC. However, signage for the commercial component Tracts I and II and the ALF, Tract III, of the project shall be unified into a common design theme. In addition, Tracts II and III shall be permitted a ground sign at the U.S. 41 entrance way. 4.13 Architectural Control: All site and building design shall conform to the requirements of Division 2.8 of the Collier County LDC to insure a unified architectural design and theme; however, parking will be generally developed as ~picted on the PUD Master Plan for Tract I, the retail component of the project. 4.14 Parkin[~ · In accordance with the requirements of Division 2.3 of the LDC and Section 2.6.26.1.2.3. 4.15 Lighting, All lighting shall be screened from adjacent properties. Particular attention should be given to shielding all light from adjacent assisted living facility to the north and residential development existing or taking place both north and south of the subject property. SECTION V PERMI'Iq'ED USES AND DIMENSIONAl, STANDARDS 5. I Purpose: The purw~sc of this Section is to identify pcrmitlcd uses and development standards fl~r areas within thc Tamiami Profcssiomd Center PI Master Plan for Tracts I. I[. ltl. and Conservation Areas I and Il. 5.2 General Description: Tracks I. Il, ~nd IV. as shown on the PUD Master Plan. are designed to accommodate a full range of principal uses. and accessory uses. Tile tw~ Conservation Areas are to be left in Ihcir natural stale. Thc acreage of thc tracts, depicted on tile PUD Masfer Plan. is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Preliminary, Subdivision Plat submittal in accordance with Division 3.2 of the Collier County 1.DC. All tracls are designed to accommodate inlcrnal roadways, open spaces, water management facilities and other similar uses. Development of rctall uses. authorized in Section 5,3 fi~r Tract I. shall not be pcrmiucd. until such time as. Ibc Future l,and Usc F. Icmcnt of Ordinance 97-67 of Ibc Growlh Management Plan providing for thc Office and In-fill Subdistrict is adapted. In the interim, uses authorizcd by ,Section 2.2.12. Commercial Professional Dislrict (C-I ) and Commercial Professional Transitional District (C- I ;F). of tile Land Development Code. as they exist as of the date of the approval of this PUD. shall be permitted subject to the requirement that the gross floor area of authorized office uses shall not exceed twenty- five (25.000) square feet. 5.3 Permitted Princioal Uses and Slructurcs: No building or structure, or parl thereof, shall be erected, ultcrcd or used. or land used, in whole or parL for other than tile following: A.) Tracts I & Il: I, All ofthe Permitted and Conditional uses in the C-I and ClEf Zoning Districts of the LDC, in effect on thc date of approval of this PUD, for Tracts I and II. excluding; homeless shelters, and soup kitchcnr~. 2. Retail uses on Tract I are those permitted in the C-2 District of the LDC, in effect on the date of approval of this PUD, with Ihe exception of the 5-1 fiHJnwing: CondltJooal U~cs in C-2 Di~lrict. gasoline ~crvJcc stnthms, drivc.in nmi fast.food rcstaurnnls, B.) Con~m~don Area I nnd il I, Permitlcd [Ises fi~r Conservmim} Areas I and II, depictcd Master l'hm. are limited lo boardwalks, nature trail~, and similar passive rccrcafinna111~¢3. ~0 a5 lO retain Ihcsc arca~ fimdamcnlally in their natural C.) Tract Ilk I, Grnup ('arc Facilitics (category I & I1}: cnrc unil~, suhjccl lo provi~ion~ nf Chiller County I,DC ,cclion 2.2.3.3.6; m,r,ing homc~: a~i~lcd living facilitic, pur~uanl In 4(}0,402 F.S. and Ch, 5~A-5 F,A,C,: nfld cnnfinuing care rctircmcnf cmnmunhics pur~tmnl fn 651 F,S, nnd Ch. 4,1 g3 F.A,(',; all subject In ('oilier County I,DC Section 2,6,26, I, Accessory u~s and slructurcs c~slofnarily ass()ciatcd with thc above permitted u~ and ~lruclurcs. including vehicular garagc~ or covered parking, cxccpl C(mscrvalion Areas Inod 2, Accessory uscs lypically as~ocialcd wilh AI,Fs. including cmnnmn nrcas ~crvice, rccreali.nnl usc~, alld ndminislrnfive Ihcilitic~, 3, Any olhcr u~ which is cnmparnhlc io nature with thc fi~rcgoing usc~ nnd which Ihc Dcvclnpmcol Scrvicc~ Dirccior (lclcrmioc~ In he cnmpalihlc, 5.5 pi~cnsional ~t~dards Iht l'cnnittcd Uscs: A.} Tracts I & Ih I. Minimum I.ol Area: Fifteen Ihnunaml ~ 15.00{)) SqtlilrC feel. 2. Minimum 1,ol Widlh: One hundred (100) fccL 3, Minimum yard a. Front Yard: Sixly (60) fc~t fi~r Tracl I I?om the U,S, 41 R.O,W,, and twenty-five (25) feet for Trnct Il from Ihe internal roadway edge (,fthc pllVC~crl[, b, Side Yard: Fiflccn (15) fccl. 5-2 II II IIII IIII ! I 12ill J~VC (2~) I~cl ~0~ 'I'r;SCl Il, ,1, M~xirnum I lcJghl: ~ ~mrics c)r Ihirly-~vc (~) loci, 5, Minimum I:h~.r Arc;~: ~hle Ihml~;uld ( I ,()00) ~qu.re I~'cl fi)r c;~ch huilding ~hlimum (~ll:Nlrccl I';~rkin~ ~snd (~ll'-SIr~cl Scuff(,) 2.~ ~fflhc l,I)(~. 7, Mcrclmndi~c mcrclmn(li~c i~ pr.hihhud. l)cvcl()pfncnl Internally; A m;~xinnJm Ih()u~tmd (2~,000) ~(l~J;~rc I~cl .I ,diSc(' ls~c r?my hc (IcvL. h)pcd (,n Tr;]cl II. B,) 'J'rncl 2, Minimum I,.I Wi(lib: I Minitn.m Y;~r(I J(cquir~,rncnl~: I'mnl Y~rd: Filtccn (15) I~cl I'r~m~ d~c cd~c .1' p:~vcmcnl ~d'lhc ,ccc~, drive exclusive nf p.rkin~ ~rcl~ int..rnal t. I1~ pr. joeL h, .Side Yard: 'l'wcnly.fivc (2~) I~'ct, h.wcvc~, widdn Iht ddt ynrd unc~vcrcd pnd~s, sidcw.lk,, .nd xvulls ~ix (6) I~cl nr k ~ in hc~ghi nmy hc ~rmiltcd wid~in fifteen (15) l~ct ()fthc pr.pony linc ,ulside Ihu lund~cupe 4. Ml~ximum I luighl: Two (2) sloric~ ~r Iw~nly-I~v~ (2~) I~cl. Minimum ()ff-~lra~l Pnrking and ()l'~-SIr~cl S~clion 2.3, und S~Clit~n 2,6.2fi. 1.2.3 ~1' Ih~ I,I)C. 6, lhJilding ~upnrnli(m: One Imlf(I/2) thc ~um ()l'lhc building hciGhlx. ?. D~:v¢lopmcnt Intcnsity: A maxim.m fl~r area ralio of.45 is ~rmi[tcd fi~r Assisled l,iving Facilities in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.6.26 ~flhc I,DC, 5-4 II i 1281 SECTION VI I'~NVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS The purpose of this Section is lo set forth the environmental commitments of thc project developer. 6,1 Two Conservation Areas arc depicted on tile PlJI) Master Plan and comprise 2.53 acres of native habitat to be retained and enl~anced. 6.2 The petitioner shall be subject to the hmdscaping and buffering requirements of Section 2.4 of the LDC, with expanded buffers as provided for herein in Section 4. I 0 of this Ordinance 6.3 Petitioner shall be subject to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the LI)C pertaining to archaeological resources in the event thc)' arc idcntilicd on Iht propcr~y contained in thc ('onscrvation and Coastal Management Element (discover' ora archaeological or historical site. artifact or other indicator ofprcscmation). 6.4 Petitioner shall obtain and submit documcnlation of all necessary local, state and t~:dcral permits. 6.5 Thc applicant shall be subject to all environmental ordinances in cffcct at the time ~1' development order approvals. 6.6 Native vcgctalion prcscn'ation shall conform lo the requirements of Section 3.9.5.5.4 of the Collier County I,I)C and prcscn'e areas shall bc generally provided fo,' as depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Adjustments to the boundaries of the prcsemation area may be made at the time o£ Final Site Development Plan Approval in accordance with thc standards o£Section 4,5 of this Ordinance. 6.7 An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance (exotic free) pk:n ll)r the site, with emphasis on the conscv.'atiorffprcscrvation areas, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to l:inal Site Plan/Construction approval. 6.8 A Gopher Tortoise relocation plan shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 6.9 Pctitioner shall comply v,,ith the guidelines and recommendations ortho U.S. Fish 8.: Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) regarding potential impacts to protected wildlife species. Where protected species are observed on site, a lIabitat Management Plan for those protected species shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and appro~. al prior to Final Site Plan/Construction approval. 6-I SECTION VII TRANSPORTATION REQUIRHMENTS Thc purpose of this Section is to set forth the transportation commitments of the project developer. 7.1 The develop,:r shall provide arterial street lighting ofthe project entrance. Said improvement shall be in place prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 7.2 The road impact fee shall be as set forth in Ordinance 92-2. as amended, and shall be paid at the time building permits are issued, unless other,.visc approved by thc Board o1' Count>' Commissioners. 7.3 Internal access improvements shall n{~t be subject lo impact £ce credits. 7.4 All traffic control devices used shall con£orm with the ,Manual on llnifi~rm Tra£fic Control Devices as required by Chapter 316.0745. Florida Statutes. 7.5 Thc single project connection to ILS. 41 shall be restricted lo right-in/right-out turning movements and left turning movements for southbound IJ.S. 41 traffic, per FI)O*/' approval. 7.6 Shared access shall bc pro','ided with the adjacent property to the norlh, provided thc nccessa,'3' cross-casements can be obtained. 7-1 SECTION Vlll IJTII.I'IY AND ENGINEER/N(; RF. QIIIRF, MF. NTS The purpose of this Section is lc, scl forth the utilities and engineering commitments of tile project developer. 8.1 Utilities: A. Se;vet and water sen'icc shall be provided by Collier County. All pertinent requirements pertaining to thc extension and constructN'~ of water distribution and sewage collection facilities shall be mci. B. Water distribution, scwagc collection and transnlission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to scn'c the project arc to be designed, constructed. conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-76. as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. C. All customers connecting to tile water distribution and sewage collection facilities to bc constructed will be customers of thc County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the Cot,nty's established ~alcs. Should thc County not be in a N)sition lo provide water and/or sewer, custome:'s shall be customer:~ of tile interim utility eslablishcd to scn'e thc project until the Counly's off-silo water and/or sewer thcilities are available to scn'e tile pruject. D. Appropriate easements for any project internal water improvcmenls shall be doctl~cnted on Ibc conslrucliOn plans lind shall be dedicated to the Cailler County Water-Sewer District. Ii. Con,ruction drawings, technical specifications anti all pcnincm design information shall bc submitted in accordance with Collie County Ordinance 97-017 or amendments made tllercto and shall bc approved prior to thc issuance of development construction approval. 8.2 F.n~inccrin~: A. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to thc l)evelopmcnt Sen'ices Department for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of thc proposed construction, in accordance with the submitted plans, is granted by thc Development Sen'ices Dcpanmcnt. 13. Design and construction ofall improvements shall be subject to complinncc with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County I.DC. 8-1 C. Subdivision o£ thc site shall require platting in accordance with Section 3.2 o£ thc LDC to define the rlght..o£-way and tracts shown on the PUD Master Plan. D. The developer and all subsequent petitioners shall be required to satisfy the requirements of all County ordinances or codes in effect prior to or concurrent with any subsequent development order relating to this site, including but not limited to Preliminary Subdivision Plats, Site Development Plans and any other application that will result in the issuance o£a final development order. 8-2 · I II II IIIII I I Ir I SECTION IX WATF. R MANAGEMEN'[ REQUIREMENTS Thc purpo~ of this Section is tn Mt fi)rlh the water managcmcnl commilmcnls o£lhc project developer. 9.1 Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall bc submiitcd to thc I)cvclopmcnt Services Department for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of thc proposed construction, in accordance with Ibc s'~bmittcd plans, is gn, ntcd by the Development Services l)cpnrtmcnt. 9.2 Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with thc appropriate provisions of Iht Collier County I,DC 9.3 I.andscaping may be placed within thc water management areas in compliance with thc criteria established within Section 2.4.7.3 of thc I.I)C. 9-1 1281 - November 10. To: Collier County Commissioners From: Beverly C. Davlsson. President Greater Imperial Board We arc here rcpre.~nling the neighborhoods oflmperial in norlh ('oilier County. It is our understanding that the County ha.,~ plans to allow the new propo~d development of the Tamiami Professional Center to exit onto Imperial Golf Cour.~ Blvd. a privately owned slrcel. Imperial GolfCour~ Blvd is the sole entry and exit for our neighborhoods. At pre,at, there are approximately 3.000 residenl vehicles using our streel and the tra~c light at the inters(etlon of RT 41. Plus. another 1.000 vehicles (minimum) go through lhe .service gate at ~'~sl twice daily. 'llfis is already a very busy intersection and our neighborhood is yet to he comp/el(cl. Preliminary pi;ms of l[olc Montes & As.mciates indicate parking spots for 131 vehicles for thc forward buildings and another 35 spots for the assimed living collages. With such heavy traffic heading east and west on Ibis .~cllon oflmpcrial Gol£Cour.~ Blvd. it will become ~mcwhal dangerous for traffic IryJng Io lurn Icfl ohio our sir(el from this development and thc olher developments using the private drive behind Cronin's. So far, our rmsler a.s.socmtmn. (Grea er Impor,al I?,oard). h.ts taken care of all maintenance. resurt:,lcing, re-striping, and repair of Imperial Gol£Coursc Blvd. ()ur master a~3ciafion has handled all drainage and water problems. All lighting and land.~aping and maintenance ol'them have been by Ibc master n'.;sociatkm. Thc master a.'~.,,oclallon has had to handle thc extra co.~s of traffic from thc Imperial Plaza. the NI lC Health Care Facility and the medical building on thc corner. By adding additional public traffic onto this private roadway, you will increa.~ our costs substantially to continue to maintain this roadway and su~0unding area. We do not believe that private residents should be fUnding and maintaining a roadway fi)r public use. We ask thai the. County take over responsibility for Imperial Golf Course Bird between RT 41 and the guardhouse, and that you deny further public access to Imperial GolfCeur~ Blvd. until such' time. Thank you for your consideration. Beverly C. Davisson 13 I O O-G7 Ilamilton I larbour Dr. ~3' Naples, Florida 34110 Phone 594-8581 Fax 594-8175 My name is Ned Robbins I am currently the Resident Director of Park Place West in Imperial Golf Estates Our area abutts, and will be affected by the proposed plan under consideration by the Board of C'ollier Count,,,' C'ommissioners today· We question that the property involved qualifies for identification as a multi-usc PUD We believe that the narrow 200' width ofthls property which has been serving as a ~'nited water shed is insufficient to accommodate these purposes with the number ofbuitdings, roads, parking requirements, sidewalks and walls proposed. The impact of the figure of 108,680 square feet of impervious area. calculated at 43% of total space.can be deceptive on a total width of 200 feet We question that the property can be utilized in the manner proposed without negative consequences. The land indicated as a conservation reserve in the plans might well be so designated as it is currently serving as is much of this land.as a water run-offarea to Horse Creek. According to the site plan. almost one-half of the pervious land wilt become impervious. Further. we do not see an)' finali;,~tion of/he number of parking spaces Are we to assume that approval can be granted before this designation is completed? We also believe that the drainage improvements made this year at the eastern end of PPW may be impacted by the amount of'coverage proposed What studies have been done to evaluate the degradation ofthls presumably flood control area caused by the elimination of permeable land? While others will speak to the use of Imperial Golf Course Bird as an exit for the proposed entity, l wish to note here that Imperial Crol£Estates has already been placed in jeopardy without adequate hurricane evacuation facilities. It has only one exit on a road that more than one night of "Mil<h" rain would put under water. This is due in large part to building near thc exit at the main gate that has taken place without due regard for water run-off Now the Commissioners are being asked to approve a change in zoning for a PUD some 200 feet wide. As abutting properly owners we believe that there is an ordinance ,~,hich protect.; such owners from being flooded by new construction. We ask the Commissioners to thorou ,,h!y investigate the actual potential damage to us from this proposed development. Thank you 1ZB1 Conzmissioners of Collier County, Florida: ........... y, ?lorlda, ~s changed from "A" Agriculture to "PUD" ~ " 12B1 PASSED ;diD DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners cf Collier Ccunty, Florida, this ~ day of ~ 1998. ' .... ~· , BOARD OF COUHTY COMMISSIONERS ,. · . COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY:BARB~RA B. ~ERRY~ Cha'krm~ ~'q'~W~G~T. E. BROCK, Clerk ~ttest ~to'¢h4l,.~a.$ $$9~atureo~]j. Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency '.~ . , ' -~,.,. Marj~rle ~, Student Assistant County Attorney -2- TAMIAMI PROFESSIONAL CENTER Prepared for: Prepared by: IIole, Montes and Associates, Inc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, Florida 34102 (941) 262 - 4617 HMA File No. 98.61 July. 1998 Revised October 1998 Date Filed: Date Review by CCPC: Date Approved by BCC: /_L//o,/~,J'~ Ordinance No: 9fi_ ?~ TABLE OF CON'rENTS I. STA'FEMENF OF COMPI.IANCE I1 PROPER'FY OWNERM liP, I.EGAI. I)ESCP. IPTION AND MIORT 'HTI.E, AND UNIFIED CONTROL III STATF. MENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT I)F. SCRIPTION IV GF-NEILa. I. DEVELOPMEN'F REGUI.ATIONS V PERMI'FTED USES & DIMENSIONAl, STANDARI)S VI ENVIRONMENTAl. STANDARDS VII TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS VIII ENGINEF, RING AND UTII,H'IF, S REQUIREMI.;NTS IX WAIER MANAGEMENI REQUIREMENTS LIST OF EXHIBITS EXItIBIT A. - CONCI'TPTUAI. PUD MASTER PI.AN EXIIIBIT B - I.ANDSCAPING AND WALI. DETAIl. CP. OSS SECTION FOR Tt~ ACT III NOR'I'll AND EASI PROPERTY LINES SECTION STATF. MENT OF COMPI,IANCI~ Thc development nf I 1.57 acres of properb' in Section 15. Tnv.'nship 48 South, Range 25 East. as a Planned Unit Development. to bc knn',,,n as the '1 amiami I'rofcs.,.ional Center Planned Unit Development. is in compliance with thc planning goals and objectives ofli~e Collier County Gro',,,lh Management Plan based upon the tbllowing reasons: I. I Thc :;uhject properb. is located in an area id(ntt fled as a Mix(" I;sc i Irban Rcsidcnlial in the Future I.and Usc Element of the Growth Management Plan fi~r Collier Count.','. 1.2 Thc project is consistent v,'ith the provisions of Commercial Under Criteria of thc 1989 (.;roy, Ih Management Plan and may al~ bc [bund consistent with the proposed Commercial and Office lnfill Subdistrict of the Future l.and Usc Element of Ordinaucc 97-67. not ','ct adopted at the time of application for this Planned lJnit Development. 1.3 The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems, existing and manmade, for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities. 1.4 The project shall bc in compliance v,'ith all applicable County regulations including thc ('oilier Growth Management Plan. 1.5 The project ','.ill be sen'cd by. a complete range o 'scrv ces and utilities as approved by Iht County. 1.6 l'hc project is compatible with adjacent land uses through thc internal .'lrrangement of :;tructures. thc placement of land usc buffers, and the proposed de,,'elopmcnt standards contained herein. 1.7 'I hc Planned IJnil I)c'.'clopo~cnt includes open spaces and natural features wlfich arc prcsep,'ed from future development in order to cnhancc their natural function; and to serve as a project amenity. 1.8 All final local l)cvclopment Orders lbr this project arc subject to the Collier County Concurrency Management System. as implemented by thc Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. 1.9 The prolx)sed plan is consistent with l'olicy 5.8 of thc (.'oilier County Gro'ali~ Management Plan v,'hich permits care facilities within the Urban Designated Area subject to regulations containcd in thc I,I)C with which thc subject properly fully complies. 1-1 12B1 SECTION Il PROPERTY OWNERSItlP, LEGAl. DESCRIPTION AND SI {OWl' TI'II.E AND UNIFIED CONTROL 2.1 Properly Ownership: The subject property is under contract for purchase to ltole, Montes and Associates and presently in the ownership of: Stcv ' e t|ouston 1369 South Downing Street Denver. Colorado 80210 2.2 Legal Description: The south 200 feet of thc southwest ¼ of Section 15. Tovmship 48S. Range 25 E of Collier Count)' Florida, less U.S. Itighway No. 41 (State Road No. 45). 2.3 Shorl Title: This Ordinance shall be knovm and cltcd as the I am~aml I rofesslona Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance". 2.4 Statement of Unified Control; It is the intent of IIole. Montes and Associates, Inc., to establish a Planned Unit Development on I 1.57 acres in Section 15, Township 48 South. Range 25 East, (;oilier County, Florida. Thc subject properly is under unified control and ownership for thc purpose of obtaining 2.5 Physical Description: The subject property is long and narrow, 200 x 2520, and is located just to the south of Imperial Golf Estates and north of Collier Reserve. and on the east side of U.S. 41. Soils for the subject properly include seven (7) Immokalee Fine Sand, seventeen (I 7) Basinger Fine Sand, and thirty-nine (39) Satellite Fine Sand. The site drains into Horse Creek and the Itorse Creek flowway will be maintained after development. Water quality treatment will be directed to grassed swales and detention areas prior to discharge into Horse Creek. 2-1 SECTION II1 STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPI'ION 3.1 Introduction: It is the intent of the dcvelov:r to establish a Planned Unit Development meeting the requirements as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The purpose of this document is to set forth guidelines, fi)r the future development of the project, that meet accepted planning principles and practices. Collier County Growth IVtanagement Plan. 3.2 Project l)cscription: Thc project is comprised of about 11.57 acres and is located 580 feet south of Imperial Golf Course Blvd. on the cast side of U.S. 41 in Section 15, Township 48 South, Range 25 l-Nsf. Access to the project is provided by a connection onto U.S. 41 and shared access is contemplated with thc adjacent property to the north, which will provide access to the three (3) tracts which are proposed for development. The project is intended to support a selected range of retail and office uses on 1.97 acres, and an Assisted Living Facility on 5.52 acres to meet the needs of the surrounding community. 3.3 Land ~se Plan and Proiect Phasing: A. The PUD Master Plan contains a total of six (6) tracts consisting of three (3) dcvclupmcnt areas, two (2) Conscn'ation Areas and roadway area and are noted as TABLE Tract I Tract II Office 1.06 Tract 111 ~ A.L.F. 5.52 Conservation Area I Preserve 2.31 Conservation Area 11 Preserve 0.22 [ Tract R Roadway 1.55 The Master Plan is designed to be flexible with the placement of buildings, related and facilities to be determined at the time of site water management development plan and permitting approval, based on compliance with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance, LDC and local, state and federal permitting requirements. All tracts may be combiaed or developed separately subject to complianc.¢ with the applicable dimensional requirements contained within this document. Final lot cob. figuration will be determined during the Preliminary Subdivision Plat revi~' process. B. The anticipated time of build-out of the project is approximately three (3) years beginning in 1999. SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The purpose of this Section is to set forth thc development regulations m be applied Io the development and usc of thc Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development and Master Plan. 4. I General: The following arc general provisions applicable to the PUD Mas~er Plan: A. Regulations for development of the Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, the PUD- Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of tile Collier County I,DC in effect at the time of building permit application. Should these regulations fail to provide specific developmental standards, then thc provisions of the most similar zoning district in thc Collier County I,DC shall apply. B. Unless othcm'isc noted, thc definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in thc I,DC in effect at thc time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for tile development of the Tamiami Professional Center Planned Unit Development shall become part oftbe regulations which govern the manner in which this site may be developed, I). All tracts identified on the PUD Master Plan may be used Cot water management purposes and parking. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject lo a concurrency rcvic;v under the provisions of Division 3.15 of the LDC [~ :training to Adequate Public Facilities at the earliest or next to occur ofeither l~nal SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 4.2 Site Clearing and Drainage: Clearing. grading, earthwork, and site drainage v, ork shall hc performed in accordance with the Collier Count)' I.DC and the standards and commilments of this document at the time of construction plan approval. 4-1 12B1 4.3 Easements for Utilities: Easements, where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be required by Collier Count),. All necessary easements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure thc continued operation and maintenance ofall sen'ices and utilities to insure compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time construction plans and plat approvals are requested. 4.4 Amendments to the Ordinance: Amendments to this Ordinance and Master Plan shall be pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County LDC. 4.5 Proicct Plan Approval Requirements: Attachment "A". PUD Master Plan. constitutes the required I'UI) Development Plan. Subsequent to. or concurrent with. PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat shall be submitted for thc entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. All subdivision of property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC. Pr/or to recording of thc final subdivision plat, when required by the Subdivision Regulations set forth in Section 3.2 of the LDC. final plans of the required improvements shall receive thc approval ofalt appropriate Collier Count)' governmental agencies to ensure compliance with thc PUD Master Plan, the Count)' Subdivision Regulations and the platting laws of thc State of Florida. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development orders, the provisions of Section 3.3, Site Development Plans shall be applied to all platted parcels. 4.6 Sunset and Monhoring Provisions: Thc Tamiami Professional Center PUD shall be subject to Section 2.7.3.4 of thc LI)C, Time Limits for Approved PUD Master Plans and Section 2.7.3./;, Monitoring Requirements. 4.7 Polling Places: Any community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility located within the Tamiami Professional Center PUD may be used for a polling place, if determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with Section 2.6.30 of the LDC. 4-2 12B1 4.g Native Vegetation Retention Requirements: Thc project shall preserve native habitat, in accordance with provisions of Section 3.9.5, Vegetation Removal Protection. and Presep.'ation Standards. of the Collier County I,and Development Code. 4.9 Common Area Maintenance: Common Area Maintenance. including the maintenance of common facilities, open spaces and the water management facilities shall be the responsibility of the owners' association, together with any applicable permits and condition~ from applicable local, State. or Federal permitting agencies. 4. t0 Landscaping Requirements: All landscaping requirements, buffers, walls, and bcrms shall be developed in conformance with requirements of DMsion 2.4 of the Collier County LDC pertaining to landscaping and buffering; however, buffering along U.S. 41 at the front of the property shall be at a twenty (20) feet minimum, and the side yard buffer requirements shall be liftccn (15) feet along thc north and south property line for all tracts. Landscaping for Tracts I and Il shall be ora similar plant material and composition. Furthermore. a landscape type B buffer shall be developed in accordance with LDC requirements along the north properly line in areas adjacent to thc proposed office building on Tract Il and an existing assisted facility located along thc north property line. 4.11 Open Space and Common Areas: Thc project shall meet or exceed the thirty (30) percent open space requirement sctforlh in Section 2.6.32,3 of thc I,DC with thc con,servation and buffer areas depicted on thc PUD Master Plan. Open space shall also include all pervious green space with development parcels and lots. 4.12 Signs: As provided loc within Section 2.5, Signs, of thc Collier Count>' LDC. ttowcvt r, signagc fi~r the commercial component Tracts I and II and the AI.F. Tract lll, of the project shall be unified into a common design theme. In addition. Tracts 11 and iii shall be permitted a ground sign at the U.S. 41 entrance way. 4.13 Archltectura (v'ontrol: All site and building design shall conform lo the requirements of l)ivision 2.8 of thc Collier County [,DC to insure a unified architectural design and theme; however, parking ',,,'ill be generally developed as depicted on the PUD Master Plan for Tract I, thc retail component of thc project. 4- 3 1 2B1 4.14 Parking In accordance with the requirements of Division 2,3 of the LDC and Section 2.6.26.1.2.3. 4.15 Lighting All lighting shall be screened from adjacent properties. Particular attention should be given to shielding all light from adjacent assisted living facili:y to the north and residential development existing or taking place both north and south of the subject propcrty. 4-4 SECTION V PERMITTED USES AND DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.1 Purpo~: The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within thc Tamiami Professional Center PUD designated on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan for Tracts I. II, III, and Conservation Areas I and II. 5.2 General Descriptinn: Tracts I. Il, and IV, as shown on the PUD Master Plan, are designed to accommodate a full range of principal uses, and acccssoo' uses. Thc two Conservation Areas arc to be left in their natural state. The acreage of the tracts, depicted on the PUD Master Plan. is based on conceptual designs ahd is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided the nme qfPrehmmar)' Subdw~smn Plat subm~ talm accordance w~th D~v~s~on 3.2 of the Collier Count.',' LDC. All tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, water management facilities and other similar uses. Development of retail uses. authorized in Section 5.3 for Tract I, shall not be permitted, until such time as, the Future Land Use Element of Ordinance 97-67 of thc Management Plan providing for the Office and In-fill Sub, district is adopted. In thc interim, uses authorized by Section 2.2.12, Commercial Professional District (C- 1 ) and Commercial Professional Transitional District (C-I/T), of the Land Development Code, as they exist as of the date of the approval of this PUD, shall be permitted subject to the requirement that the gross tloor area of authorized office uses shall not exceed twenty- five (25,000) square feet. 5.3 Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used. or A.) Tracts l & Il: I. All of the Permitted and Conditional uses in the C-I and CI/T Zoning Districts of the LDC, in effect on the date of approval of this PUD, for Tracts I and II, excluding; homeless shelters, and soup kitchens. 2. Retail uses on Tract I are those permitted in the C-2 District of dm LDC, in effect on the date of approval of this PUD. with the exception of the 12B1 ' © follmving: Conditional Uses in C-2 District, gasoline service stations, and drive-in and fast-food restaurants. B.) Conservation Area I and 11 I, [ erm~tted [;scs for Conservation Areas I and Il. depicted on the PUl) Master Plan. arc limited to boardwalks, nature trails, and similar passive recreational uses. so as to retain these areas fundrmcntally in their natural statc. 1. Group (;are Facilities (category [ & Il): care units, subject to thc provisions of Collier Count>' LDC section 2.2.3.3.6; nursing homes: assisted living facilities pursuant to 400.402 ILS. and Ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to 651 F.S. and Ch. 4.183 F.A.C.: ali subject to Collier Count?' I,DC Section 2.6.26. 5.4 Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures - All Tracls: I. Acccsmry uses and structures customarily associated wi~h thc above permitted uses and structures, including vehicular garages or covered parking, except in Conservation Areas [ and Il. 2. Accessory uses typically associated with ALFs. including common areas for food service, recreational uses, and administrative facilities. 3. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. 5.5 Dimensional Standards fi~r Permitted Uses: A.) Tracts l & Il: I. Minimum Lot Area: Fifteen thousand (15.000) suuarc feet. 2. Minimum l.ot Width: ()ne hundred (100) feet. 3. Minimum yard Requirements: a. Front Yard: Sixty (60) feet for Tract I from thc U.S. 41 R.O.W., and twenty-five (25) feet for Tract Il from thc internal roadway edge oFthc pavement. b, Side Yard: Fifteen (15) feet. c.Rear Yard: Zero (0) feel for Tract I interior to the project and twenty- five (25) feet for Tract II. 4, Maximum lteight: Three (3) stories or thirty-five (35) feet. Minimum Floor Area: One thousand (1,000) square feet for each building on the ground floor. Section 2.3 ofthe [,DC. 7. Merchandise Storage and Display: Outside storage or display of merchandise is prohibited. Development Intensity: A maximum of fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet ofretail may be developed on Tract I. A maximum of twenty-five thousand (25.000) square feet of office use ma)' be developed on Tract Il. (See also Section 5.2 ofthls Ordinance.) B,) Tracl Ilk 1. Minimum Lot Area: One (1) acre, 2. Minimum l,ot Width: Two hundred (200) feet. 3. Minimum Yard Requirements: a, Front Yard: Fifteen (I 5) feet from the edge of pavement of the access drive exclusive of parking areas internal to the project, b. Side Yard: Twenty-five (25) feet. however, within the side yard uncovered patios, sidewalks, and walls six 16) feet or less in height may be permitted within fifteen (I 5) feet of the propert3 linc outside the landscape buffer area, c, Rear Yard: Twenty-five (25) feet. 4. Maximum Height: One (1) sto~ or twenty (20) feet. 5. Minimum Off-Street Parking and Off-Street l,oading: As required in Section 2.3, and Section 2.6.26.1,2,3 of thc I,DC, 6.' Building separation: One half(I/2) the sum ofthe building heights, 5-3 Development Intensity: A maximum floor area ratio of,45 is permitted for Assisted Living Facilities in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.6.26 ofthe LDC. Prior to site clearing, a tem~rary construction fence will go up around thc perimeter ofthe property for Tract III. Upon completion of filling the site, the construction of the privacy wall will go up at the same time as the construction of buildings along the north and east property lines as depicted on Exhibit B, file landscaping cross section. SEC I ION VI F. NVI RONMENTAI, S'FANDARDS '['he purpose of this Section is to set forth the environmental commitments of the project developer. 6.t Two Conscr-,'ation Areas are depicted on thc PUl') Master Plan and comprise 2.53 acres of native habitat to be retained and enhanced. 6.2 The petitioner shall be subject to the landscaping and buffering -,.'quircmcnts of Section 2.4 of thc I,I)C. xvith expanded buffers as provided for herein in Section 4. I0 of this Ordinance. 6.3 Petitioner shall be subject to Section 2.2.25.8. I of thc I,DC pertaining tn archaeological resources in thc event thc,',' arc identified on thc property contained in thc Cnnscn'ation and Coastal Management Element (discovery nfo archaeological or historical site. artifact or other indicator of preservation), 6.4 Petitioner shall obtain and submit documentation of all necessary local, state and federal pemfits. 6.5 The applicant shall be subject to all environmental ordinances in effect at thc time of development order approvals. 6.6 Native vegetation preservation shall conform to the requirements of Section 3.9.5.5.4 of the Collier County 1,DC and prescn'c areas shall be generally provided for as depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Adjustments to the boundaries of the preservation area ma,'.' be made at thc time of Final fiitc l)cxelopmcnt Plan Apprnval in accordance with the standards of Section 4.5 of this Ordinance. 6.7 ,\n exotic vegetation removal, monitoring amt maintenance {cxutlc free) plan tbr thc site. with emphasis on thc conscp.'alion/prcservation areas, shall be submitted to Current Planning l{nvironmental Review Staff for rcvicw and approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction approval. 6.8 A Gopher Tortoise relocation plan shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff' for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approvai. 6.9 Petitioner shall comply 'with the guidelines and recommendations of thc U.S. I ish & Wildlife Sen'ice (USFWS) and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) regarding potential impacls Io protected wildlife specics. Where protected species are observed on site, a l labitat Management Plan lbr those protccted species shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan/Construction approval. 6- I 12B1 6.10 A Conservation Easement shall be placed over the preserYes and recorded on the plat (or by separate instrument ifthe parcel is not platted) with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation areas shall be dedicated on the peat to the project's homeowners association or likely entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Co lier Count>' with no responsibility for maintenance. SECTION Vll TRANSPOR'FATION REQIJII~EMI..'NTS Thc purpose of this Section is to scl forth thc transrx~rtatlon commitments of thc project developer. 7.1 Thc developer shall provide arterial slrcct lighting of thc project entrance. Said improvement shall be in place prior to thc issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 7.2 Thc road impacl lee shall be as set forth in Ordinance 92-2. as amended, and shall be paid at thc time building permits are issued, unless othcrv, lsc approved by the. Board o£ County Commissioners. 7.3 Internal access improvements shall not be subject lo impact l'cc credits. 7.4 All traffic control devices used shall conform with the Manual on Uniform Traffic ~'ontrol Devices as required by Chapter 316.0745. Florida Statutes. 7.5 The single project connection to U.S. 41 shall be restricted to right-in/right-out turning movements and left tumlng movements for southbound IJ.S. 4l traffic, per FDOT approval. 7.6 Shared access shall be provided with thc adjaccm property t<~ tl~c north, provided the necessary cross-easements can be obtained. 7.7 Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at thc project entrance. 7.8 This office encourages the applicant's pursuit of an access connection with thc properly to ~be north to alleviate access conflicts onto U.S. 41 North. 7.9 I:.vidcncc of an FDOT Connection Permit or a Notice of Intent to Issue a Cono¢ction Permit shall be provided prior to the issuance of any development order on thc property. 7-I " 1 281 "" SI.~C'I'ION VIII I!TII,ITY AND ENGIN[.TF, RING RI:,QIJIRIeMI.;NI'S The purpo~ of this Secti<m is m set Ihrth thc nlililics and cngincerhlg cmnmitments ~l*thc project dcvclo~r. 8.1 Utilities: A. Scx~cr and x~atcr service shall ~ prnvidcd hv ('~*llicr ('~mnly. All pc~incnt rcquircmcnls ~aining tn thc cxlcnsion and conslrucli{r {~f'walcr distrihuti{m ami qcwagc c~fllccli~m facilities shall be mci. B. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmissi(m and interim water and/ar sea, age treatment fi~cilitics to serve thc prniect arc m be designed, cunstructcd. convcscd. {~wned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No 88-76. as amended, and other applicable (~{mnty rnlcs and rcgulati~ms. C. All cust~mmrs connecting to thc water distributi~m and sewage collection fi~cililics to ~ constructed ~'ill bc customers o['thc County and will b~ billed by thc Cmmty in acc(~rd:mce with the County's established ra~cs. Nhould thc County ~ in a ~}sition to provide water and/or scx~er, custnmc~s .4halI be customers ol thc interim utility established to sc~'c thc project until thc County's off-site water and/or sex, er fi~cilities arc a~'ailable m serve the project. D. Appropriate casements fi~r any project internal water improvements shall ~ documented on the construction plans and shall ~ dedicated to the Collier ('mmty Water-Newer District. E. Constmctinn drawings, technical spccilications and all pertinent design infi~ation shall ~ submitted in accnrdancc with Collie. County Ordinance 97-017 or amendments made thcretn and shall bc approved print to the issuance of'devch~pmcnt c~mstruction approval. 8.2 Enginec.ring: A Detailed paving, grading, site drainage ami utility phms shall be submitted to thc Dcvclnpmcnt Services Dcpa~mcnt fi~r rc~icw. N~, construction ~mfits shall be isgued unless and until approval of thc proposed construction, in accr~tdancc with the submitted plaus, is granted by the Development Sca'ices l)cpa~ment. B. Design and construction ofall imptnvemcnts shall he subject to compliance with thc appropriate pruvisk~ns rd'thc Collier ('mmty I.DC. C. Subdivision of thc site shall require platting in accordance with Scction 3.2 of thc LDC to define the right-of-way and tracts shown on the PUD Ma~ter Plan. D. The developer and all subsequent petitioners shall be required to satisfy the requircment~ of all County ordinances or codes in effect prior to or concurrent with any subsequent development order relating to this sitc. including but not limited to Preliminary Subdivision Plats. Site Development Plans and any other application that will result in the issuance ora final development order. SECTION 1X WATER MANAGgMENT REOUIREMEN'I'S The purpose oflh}s Section is Io set forlh thc water management commilments of the project developer. 9.1 Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall bc submitted lo the Development Services Department for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of thc proposed construction, in accordance v,'ith Ibc submitted plans, is granted by thc Development Scmccs I)cparlmcn. 9.2 Design and construction ofall improvements shall bc subject to compliance wilh tile appropriate prov~smns of the Colher (.ounty 1.I)(. 9.3 I.andscaping may be placed wilhin the water nmnagement areas in compliaoce with tile critcria established within Section 2.4.7.3 o£1hc I,DC. 9.4 Thc petitioner shall submit a copy o£the SFWMD pcrmil application to Collier ('ounly Development Services Engineering Staff for review and comment. ENCORE SENIOR LIVING NAPLES, FLORIDA NORTH & EAST PROPERTY LINES ~ TYPICAL TYPE "B" LANDSCAPE BUFFER EXHIBIT "B" 1281 ' STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-90 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 10th day of November, 1998, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 12th day of November, 1998. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and.C~erk.' '6,. Ex-officio to Board'.~f" County Commissioner. s .' By: Ellio Hoffman ,,' . . " Deputy Clerk "~ '7' !ili11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~CATION~ Collier County CourthoUse ',,' Y~ X61 (813) 774-8408 · ~o~'~o~ (~) 77~-B~06 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA -- REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the followinR as a: XXX Normal legal Ach'crtiscmcnt //~ (Display Adv. location, cie.) Orisinaung Dcpt/Div: CommDcv. Serv./Planning PcrS~ Date: Pelilion No. (If none. give brief dcseriptionl: P~D-gg-14 Pefitioocr: (Name & Address): Granada Sboopcs A~.~oqiatc~, Ltd., 2640 Q0ldcn Gat(: Poi'.., Suifc 115, Naples, FL :34105 Name & Address of any pcrsonlst Io be notified by Clerk's Omct: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Ocorgc L. Varn,. _'~oc, Esqnirc, YounR, ','an Asscndeq~ ,~. Varnadoc, P.A., 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34 Hearing i;x:forc XXX BCC DZA - O:,hcr I I Req,.s~ed llearing dale: / l| t [~ t q '~ / Based on advemsemcn: appean.g::,lS ~ys._._~ bclorc hearing XOCX Naples Daily Ne, siS O~ber [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & 5~/c: [¢IiIion No PUD-9,{-I 4. Goor~,c L. Vamado¢ of Youne.. Asscndcro ~. Vnmado¢. P.^.. rcorcsentin~, Granada 5hooocs Associates, Ltd. rcau~tipR a r~9ne frpm "A" Rural Aariculturc to 'PUD" Planned Unit Dcveloonent IO be known as Granada Shooocs PUD for a mixed n.',~ commercial devcloomcnt coasts-rim, of maximum of 390.000 senate feet of zross floor arco inclusi,,~ g,f ~;ait, ~ffi~;~: ~ service land uses for orooenv located at the soutbeas~cm (~uadranl of Ihe intersection of U.S. 41 and Immokalee Road I~C.R. 846) in Seclion 27. Townshio 48 South. Ranze Ea~. Collier CounW. Florida. consis~in~ o1'39.2 olus or minus Companion petition(s), il'any & proposed heanng da~c: Does Pctilion Fcc include advcmsing cost'? ~Ycs [] No If Yes. ~H:at accounl should tx: chai'gcd for advertising costs: .. '--- ^ppro,'e Division [lead Date' [ t CounD' Manager Dalc Lisl Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearin~ before BCC or BZ.A: Initiating person to complete one co.',' and obtain Division ltcad approvnl before mbmiltlng to Coenty blaoager. Note: If legal document is invoh'ed, be sure that any necessnry legal review, or reqoe for ~ame, is mbmiued to CounLv AUorne.v before submilfing to Count)' Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: i~l CounZy Manager ngenda file: to [] Requesting DiHsion [] Original Cierk'~ Office B. Olher hearings: Initiating Division head to apprm: and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY:. ~ Dale Received: /~ Lf~ ~, ':Dale of Public bea~ing: cou.ty of Collier [ kB Z "~ < CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT cotuil{ co~',n'Y c~ ~o. ~ 41~ CIRCUIT COU~T ~S. FL~ ~101~ COUNTY COURt COUNTY RECORDE~ Dwight E. Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONER~ October 6, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-98-14 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 804611 October 6, 1998 George L. Varnadoe, Esq%~ire Young, van Assenderp & Varnadoe, P.A. 801 l,aurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 Re: ~4otice oX Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-98-14 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioner~ on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 6, 199~ Granada Shoppes Associates, Ltd. 2640 Golden Gate Parkway, Suite 115 Naples, FL 34105 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-98-14 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the alive referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notic,' i.~; hereby c~iven that on TUESDAYt NOVI~BEII 10, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd f'lo,~r, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, q3CI Ease Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County C,o.vunissioners will consider the ,enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:0() A.M. The title of the proposed Oldinance i,,; as follows: AN ORDI~Ud~CE ;44ENDiNG ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAIID DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPOPJ~TED AREA OF COLLIER COU~ITY, FLORIDA BY AME,'IDING THE OFFICIAL ZO}IING ATLAS MAP NUI~BERED 8527N BY CH~iGII]G THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM 'A' RUPJtL AGRICULTURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNO%'~; AS GRANADA SHOPPEf] PUD FOR A MIXED USE COMiMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A MAZIMUM OF 390,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLO~)R AREA INCLUSIVE OF RETAIL, OFFICE A~ID SERVICE LAND USES FOR ;'ROPE~.TY LegATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERI~ QUADPJ~NT r3F THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. 41 AND [M]~,O?L~LEE ROAD (C.R. ~46), IN SECTIOn; 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, FJ~IGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 39.2*_ ACRES; AND BY PROVIDI~IG AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition NO. PUD-92-14, Geor~ge L. Varnadoe o! Youn¢~, van A.~;:;enderp & Varnadoe, P.A., representing Granada Shoppes Associates, Ltd., requesting a rezone from 'A" Rural Agriculture to 'PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Granada Shoppes PUD. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interest,3d [)arties are invited to attend and be heard. NO'I'E: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register ~ the County administrator Drlor to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limite~.l to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organizati¢,n or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a Group or organization may be allotted 10 ninutes to speak o:; an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to tlc public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUN~f COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE A24ENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 9i-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH iNCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING 7HE OFFICIAL £ONtHG ATLAS MAP ,'lUMBER ~_527H; EY CHANGING ?HE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PEAL PROPERTY 'FROM "A" RURAL AGRICULTURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UHiT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS GRANADA SHOPPES PUD FOR A MIXED USE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A MAXIMUM OF 390,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA INCLUSIVE OF RETAIL, OFFICE AND SERVICE LAND USES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERN QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. 41 AND IMMOKALEE ROAD C.P. 846), i:; SECTION 2", TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUIITY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING CF 39.2~ ACRES; AND PY PROVIDING AN EFFE'i7 l','E [ATE. WHEREAS, George L. ';arnadoe of Young, '/an Assenderp & 7arnadce, P.A., representing Granada Shoppes Associates, Ltd., petltloned the Board of County Co~missioners to change the zoning the herein described real property; cf NOW, THEREFORE BE IT OP.D~.,~ "" the Board o¢ County Co=missioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein d-scribed real prcpercy ioca%eG ;n Section 27, Township 48 South, RanGe 25 East, Collier County, Y!orlda, is change~ ~rom "A" ?ural Agriculture to "?Ju" Planned Unit Development ~n accordance with the Granada Shoppes PUD Dccument, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 8527N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amendeG accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY A~OPTED by the Board of County Commissioners C~]iier County, Florida, this day of , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUHTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman DWIGHi E. BROCK, Clerk Apprcved as to Form and Legal ~uf.l.l_ncy ~l~i4ar]orie 14. Student Assistant County Attorney GRANADA SHOPPES A PI,ANNF. i) UNIT I)EVEI~OI'MI;~NT PREPAIIED FOIl (;RANADA SIIOPPES ASSOCIATES LIbIITED AU¢;I;s'I', 1998 (;r~nad~ Slmpl~C~ I'I.ANNEI) i:NIT I)EVEI,i)PME~T ig.23_~ Acres [ ~'mcd in ~cclion 27 (iRANAI)A SI I()I'PI{S ASSOCIA IhS I.INII'I PRhI'ARIq) IIY: t200 Bailey I,anc. Suhc 2(1(I Naples. Florida 34105 5'( )1 N( i vanANSHNI)I~R I' & VARNAI )1 )1'; 801 I,.,MJldLI. {)AK I)RIVI- ,. j NAI'I,I{S. H. 34101-7907 I)A I1'~ APPR()VHI) BY ('('PC 1) X I1(AI'I'R()VI.J) IIY ()RI)IN..XN('IL NI;MBILR 'I'AIiI,I-~ 01.' C'ONTENT.% ~,l ~,ll %1[ \l ~1 (~ffxll'l l *xN~'l ii ~I[()RI I[11 I ~ SI.( I I¢)", I I I (~AI. I)IiSC'RiI'i ION. PR(')PI~R I Y (}WNI.RSi liP. & 1- . ~ I ill ~l.r;tgc 2 ~ %;:les ( )It]cc nmi ('onslrucli,n ( )l'l]cc 2, ( hanses ;md Amcndmcnls to PI ;l) I)~umcul J~r I'[ ~l) N1;islcr Plan 2 1 I (~'n Space and Native VC~CI*JIioI1 Rclcnli:m Requirements 2 Nurl~lcc W;llcr I : 1 i J{l:~ ironmclll3l _ I. I 'tilhk.~ ..1, l~sign Guidelines and 2 I ~ I andsc~:~ ITuffcr~. J}c~tlls. FCllCc'~ mid Walls : t ~ . .d ~ Public I'lace~ J Sl~'l It }N 111 ('{)M Xll.,l{( IAI. I)ICVI,I.< )I'MI.N I )-I ~ ILXIIIHII ~ (}l~aNal).,~ SI I()PI'ILN I't ;I)NIAN I'1.1~ I)I.AN ~ (~VMIikP I'ik' No. IL-O6gil-O0g) ~ ILXl II1111 A- [ SI l()l'l'lN(i AREA PEI)I~S I'RIAN ~ j EXIlllIlI A-2 PAI{KIN(} ARI: ~ I t:I)I:SIRIAN EXIIIHII A-] PIRIXIILI I'R I'I~I~I',NIRIAN WAY ~ I:XIIlltll II It('AI I)IN('RII'II()N iii KI \ I'17,.11 ";T ()F ('()',,1Pl.I ~,~('1[ ?u:;,,,-c ,,I Itu- .c,.;i,,n ~, to c',.pro', thc intcn! of thc (iranada S]lopl',Cs .,\sstMalcs. I.td.. hcrclnai~cr rcicrr, cd t,~ a, lit,' J)c~cloix'r. to create a I'lanncd [~nit l)c~cltU'm:ent (PIJD) on . [and T,~.ncd m ~ccth,n ?. lm~n~hip 4~ ~outh. R~n~¢ 25 l~ast. ('oilier ('OtJ~Hy. name ,q [hSx Planned ['nil Du~cl,)pmcnt shall hc (~rnnada ~h~ ppc~ '1 hc dc~ch~pmcnt of' this {Jrt,',~lh MiIIla~ClIIClII ]'llill. 'ibc development ~iJJ bc collsisJclll ~il[1 ibc policies and I'{cmcu: alld other applicable regulations Ibr thc lbJlm~ing rcas~ms: lhc ~uhjcct prt)~'rl5 ih ~ilhin thc I'rban ('ommcrcial District. Mixed [;~' .~cfivity ('enter Subdislricl a~ idcmificd on Ibc ]-'ulurc I.and l'sc Map. lifts District is intended accommodate Thc majorib of:ill new cmnmercial z~ming m Thc (*tRIlllv. IbC Mixed I:sc ~cti~ib ('enter Su~lihtrict boundaries arc Ilcxiblc. and thc hmndarics as shown of' thc l l.I I'. Mal~ ma) ~ m~*dilicd through thc u~c of thc Maslcr J'liUlllcd Activity ('enter dc>ign;ltion ~llcrc Ibc {)cvch~'r maintains unit]cd control of a majority of a quadrmlt Mixcdl scAclixiI) ('chick IhcDc~cio~r o~nsThccnllrcb of'thch{mthcastcrnquadrant ,}l' Mixed I'>c .Actixil> Center t;2 and Thc proposed project bmmdarics represent thc tINC iht Master I'lanncd Activity ('enter concept. ibc proposed dc~cit~pmcnt is consistcnl ~i~i~ both thc existing ('o]licr ('t)tllll>' C,m{prchcnsi~c Plan and thc rcccnlly adopted plan ;,mcndmcnis. Under thc cxistin~ Plan. thc pm.itel quaJil]o ah a Master Planned Acti~ib ('enter as iT is a unil]cd phm dcvch)pmcm in thc llmn t,l' a I'UI) ~dfich encmnpasscs r~t }cil~t one fidl quadrant of designated acfi~ ~t> center. I'hc B'mncnl plan pr,,vision~ ~pccific;dl> allmv lh:xihility in Ibc hOlJildarics, illin ;illd ]oCiliilHI Ill' LiStS pCrTllillcd within an ac?~l5 t'cfllcr, hlcJuding thc modil]calion ol'lhc hquzlrc conliguration. Ibc rcccntl5 amended comprehensive plan pr,~idc5 propcn5 x~ilJl flcxihilil~ m ~,,undartcs. Jinx and I,,cali,m of uses ~ilhin a lllaMcr planned achxlb center. ,llld permits m~dificalion of thc ~quare configuration of acli~ it} c'enler qtJ:~dranls if the' aI plicanl ,milicd conlr,,I ,,f a ma orily of a quadrant. '1 he i'hm prm ido lJl;ll IO0qg c f Ibc acre;igc ~ ilhin thc afli~ il} comer i~ eligible for cmnmercial u.c~ ,ummnding thc pr,,icct a~ required in Polio> 5a o{'lhc { I I { h~tc and braiding illlpro~clllCllt5 ~GII ~ m con~plJancc l~h apphc,~hlc {and dc~t'Jopmcnl herein tim ,u..zh c~op. lina~c ;md regulated :,itjna~c. huildin.u dc:,i~n. ,.¢hicuJar and p...'dc'qri;u] Iht dc~clnpmcm ~d' (iranada Sh.ppcs will bc designed in a manner cnnsi~tcm ~ilh { ~biccli',e 7.1',,licies 7.1. 7.2. 7.3 and 7.5. which address acccss n ~ gene ~-s etral'fic and pcdcslrnm circulali,m, and cnmplianc¢ ',vilh file ('cdlicr ('ount.x .'qlr¢clscapc {mm,Ma 5, h~,ppc, &,c, n*,t IllCCl lilt minimum lhrc:..h~ddq for il t)c'~cJ~pnlcnl sit". ,d all nulncrical thrc:-holds fur retail cnnllllcrcial, oil]cc and 11. il - 5,C dc',ch,pnlcnl ;mr',uan! h~ lilt' guidcliIlo, illld stalld;.lrds .~l f~rlh therein. Thc I'Mrida l)cparhl~cnt ( '~lnmUlUl} Aflilir* ti ){ '.'\1 has rc~ icy, cd and issued a clearance letter flit thc pro j0el , q O,Illllltlrlilx lacililic~ and ~crx ices :is required in Pnlicic~ 5. I II alld I. ~}1' thc ]' umrc I.:md - Iht (iran:M:* 5hop~, will bc dcxclnpcd c~msistcnl with file (Miller ('mint) Access XlilllilgClllClll PlilllS. ils required in Scclion _.h..~8 ot thc ( olhcr ('(mnl) I.and I)cxch~pmcnt ( 'ode Granada ShopFs has received a waiver from Ibc hismrical/archcological survey and asscssmenl rcquircmcnls of Section 2.2.253.10 of thc I.and Development ('ode duc m thc site's IocatMn in a Im~ ~*lcntial area fi~r containing hislorical'archcnlogical anifi~c~s '1 he dcvclo~r ~ill cmnpl5 ~ilh Scctinn 2.2.25.8.2 of Iht lsmd I)cvch,pmcm ('~lc should accidcmal discovcQ nf any hislnric or archcological site. si~nilicam ari~filcl, t,r {~thcr Hldicat~r occur durin~ MIc dcxcJupmcnl or buiJdillg 12BZ q I-I .% E(~I'ION I I.I'~¢;AI. I)I'~N('I(II'TI()N. I'ROI'EI~TY OWNEI(.~IIII'. ANI) (;ENERAI, I)ESCIUI'TION I.I I'1 RI'OSE Ibc ~mr~c ol fiu~ ~cction i~ Io ~I I~h Ih,: Ic~al dcscnpti.n and o~ncrship ol'(~ranada I.I';(;AI. I)I':N('RII"I I()N t'lcn',c rclcr I,, } dfihi~ "B". 1.3 I'R(II'ER'I Y ()~VNERSIIIP lhmlcvard l';mncrship, a I ]orida paancrship..r ils ;[ssigns. xdmsc address is 2640 Golden (}ate Park~a? Suilc 115. Naplcs. FI. 3,1105. and ()ccan lhmlcvard Parlncrship II. ~du,sc ;~,ldrc~s is 2600 ( h ,[dcn ( kilo I'ark~a). Naples. Il 34105 1.4 GENERAl, IIES('RII'TION OF I'ROI'ERTY A. Ibc projcd s,c is I.calcd in Seclion 27. Im~nship 4g South. Range 25 East. and i~ gcncrall} t~,rdcrcd-n Ibc west hy ILS. 41 and commercially dcvclo~d property. h) thc s~llll lies thc Bay Colon) Golf {'our~. ~dfich is pall of thc Pelican Marsh IIIU I. thc cast lies AgricuhuraJly/.ned alia ulili/cd propc~y, hnnlcdJatcly nord1 lies hnm.kalcc R.ad. and commercially designated and dcvclo~d Rivcrclx~sc Sh~pphl~ ('cnlcr. ~dfich is p:m of lilt ('oilier I mci 22 DRI. f~gricuhural 1. ]([C~;lltol~* ~Jthin Ibc silo are approxin~;~lcl~ 7.5 Io 9 IUcI-N[ )VI). I)cz I:I~NIA Firm Map Panels No. 12006701931). dated June 1. Ig86. Iht Granada Shop.s properly i~ Jt~alcd ~dthin Zones "AIM I" of Iht I'I'NIA lh.~d insur;mcc rate. I ) I he soil b I~s (,n thc silo generally include Riviera linlcslonc subsiratum. (~.pclantl fi/lc wind. I'incda fine sand. Immokalcc fir~c sand. Myakka llnc sand. II;~singcr fine Pri~r I,~ dc'.elJ~l'~mcnl. ,.¢~zmt~tiu~l (m the sJl~.' prim~lril.v omsfsts ~)f' ~lclivc cmphmds ('l~*JlillCJlce ILix'cr suh-h~lsJn5, discJlilr~e IJ} Ibc Pine Ri(igc ( 1 2B Z NI'~I' "I'ION II I'l~O.II'~(q' I} I;,',,' El ,() I' ~ I I;,NT 2.1 I"~ I~,1'( )";1'~ gh~ppcs, and t~, i,icn~ib rcl~di~mships h, ~H~J',lic~,~qc (%unty ...'dinanccs. p~q~cics. 2.2 GI'~I':I(AI, I)I.~S('I(II"I'I()~ OF '1'111~ 1'1([).11'~( T A~I) 1'1(()1'()~1':1) I,ANI) Cl~llSislcllt Icv~'l ~fl'qualily Ibr prop(,scd fkaturcs [llld lhciIilk's Ibc tqil) ~J;isi~r I'Jall is illustml~d gr~phically on ILxhibil A (WMB&I'. Inc. File NIL I{-(1(~;~1'[10~). ~ ],~(t list ~tJlllillllf}' italic;ding appr(,ximalc ltlnd usc Collier ('tomb I ~md I)c~ch~pmcm ('~dc (l.I ].3 ('()~IPI.IA~('I.~ ~VI'I'II ('()IT~TY HIU) ()rdin;mce. applicaHl~ gL'CJi(HIS I~J' iJl~ i.I)(' ;md L'(fllicr ('mlnty Iht pr,~smns ~,f lhL' spL'cilic ~L'cliorl ~J thc [.l)(' their is olhcl'WJsc ~lppiic~d~lc shall appl). d~l]nitmns ~d' all terms sl~;dl k the same ~s II1R dcfiniti(ms scl fo~h in JJ~R l,l)(' i k'~,.'h,pmcm pvrinJllcd by ll~c npl~rovnl I'nh~c I dci lilic~ ( )rdmmlcc. I )ivisi~ ,n L I ~ ~,f IlK' I I )( '. ;ILL' J~iIll t)J lilt [C~II];IIiIIRS ~',JlJCJl ~o~cm dc~clopcd. I Ibc J)c~cJ,q~L'~ ~l~Jll ~IJbillJl Io Iht ('oLIIll) fill ~rlrlthil Jqll) IiiOlJiJlqJll~~. lcpor'l ill .~cc-~dm~,.c ~iI]~ I.I)~' %ccl~on 2.7. i.~. 2..1 I,ANI) ISleS ~lCrC;~c ~J Ihcs¢ II~L'~ sJliiJI I~ ~rlllJllcd ~lCL'OllllilodillL' ulJIJliCs, loJ~)~rapll)'. ~ ('~c'lalJOll. ~llld olhcr silo aJld IttarkL'l condJlhms. subjccl Io Iht provisions of ScclJon 2.7.~.5. o] Iht ('oilier ('nunly I,I)(' 'Iht lt. Roads lllld J~lJlcr JlII?iISIrLICIIIIL' II1~1)' J~' pubJJc and prJvnlc, dCa'haling on h~'alJon, design and purpose. Thc rcqucsl road in bc public s]l~Ill be Intuit h)' Ibc I)csc'lnpc'r ill Iht IJlllC or filllil ('(lllllJ)' dcvc'lopmcnl nppnwal. 'Ibc I)cvelopcr nr ils assignees ~hall he responsible J}~r IllilJlll;lJlllll~ JilL' rOlIiIs, slrL'L'Is, drllJIl~lgL'. COllllllOll ;irc;is, iiIl(I Wilier illl(J sL'wur minis shnll bc in compli;mcc wilh Ih~ applicnbJ~, pmvi~;i ,ns nF lhc (]OllllJ)' I,J)C. iiilJ~'ss olJlu'r~Jsc ilppr~wcd dltrJll~ (](lu/lJ)' dcvc'JoprJlL'ilt ~lj~prlw~lJ. s~JlJl ~L'clilllI ~ J,~]. i~l Ibc IIX' I,AI(I'~ ~I'I'IX'(;. I'~X('AVA'I'I{)~ A~I) SE'I'IIA('K RI'N)I ,% dcpicK'd m~ Ibc PI ~J) MnsK'r Plan. hikes hn~c bcu'n prclimhmrily ni~cd, wiih IlJlJ111;ll¢ [OC~llJ,~ll and COllt~LirillJoll lo bc dcl~'rnlmcd dJlrJll~ IIIc sJlc dL'vcJoplll¢lll rcvjs'w sl~cs of projccl dcvclopmcnl. 'lhc ~ual of Ihb.~ N]~slcr Plan ~ In achieve an o~crnJl ilCSlhclic CIlilraclcr fiJr IJJc prnjccl hv d~'sJ~nin~ lakes ns ,~ ~alvrj~olll alll~lijl)' Ibr Ijlc pul:lie ~ls ~cll ns Ic~ilflls oj' Ibc pro,joel. In II1;fl ru'~;ird, cxcc'plinns {~o111 slnpes and sk'lbacks may ~ dls'r X]dlI,I~'VIII~'III j)l~lrl~t slc~l'lllx~dfCl ~lllu'lld ~lJl~j ~c(Ij~I~ ~.~ I.'ll.l. Sh~q~lWS I'1 '1) durm~ dcvchq~mcm phast, s ~,1 thc pmjccl Iht' Ibllmvh~ st;mdards ~H;dl ~q~pl~ Ih~ sh~'kpik, d ~'xc;~ad(.i Nh,ckpilc Illilxillllltll hci~hl: f'hiH)-fi~' fL'ct I dl sh,u~c ;~rc~s m excess ~1' I~xe I~'u'l {~'j ill hu'i~hl sh;dl Iw ~L'jsilrill~'d II'(H11 b;~r;icls Jtlhc side sli~pu' ~d'lhe stockpile Js slc'epL'r than ?" ~;I,~ ()1.' I(1(;11'1 ,~-()I.'-~.~'A,~ il~.' J)~.",~.'J~,p*.'J I~1;I) I~];~CL' J;lll(J~C;IpJll~. ~I~ll;I~L'. IJ~Jllill~. ~V~ll.'r ill~l11~l~L'111~llJ ~.,XI,I'~5 ()1"1"1('t~ ,XNI) ('()~'~'l'l(I ("1 ION ()1"1"1('1.~ .il;ill I~c l~'llllillc~J prHiClpaJ uses Ihr~}tl~Jlt)ul (~r;ul;id;l Sh~ppCs J)l]J). 'I'I)cs¢ [I~R~ Ill;J)' ilL' ¢*ilJlcl X%~'I *~r dr) htcilili¢'s. Tll¢'Sc uses shall be stJl~jccl I() Ih¢ rL'tjuJrL'111Cnls of ~ccli¢)n ].0.]~..i. S¢'cli(m ~.,.().~.(~. ;tml l)ivisi()n 3.3 (~1' II1~ 1,1)('. wJlh Iht cxcgption IhJll thc Icnllx~rar)' u~' pcrmd slmll hc v:did Ihr(~ugJl lilt lilg ~)t' Ibc projc'cl ~vid~ no cxtcnsim~ ,)f Iht ('11,~'(;1'~ ,~I} .&~ll'~l).~ll':~'l'~ T() Piti) I)()('I~II':~T O1{ PUl) ~IA~'I'I':I{ I~I,A~' ('JI~III~L'~ ;llld ;llllL'll(Jlll~lllS Ill;I)' h~' Ill;Id~ I~l Ihi~ PI~I) ()r~:~n~lllC~ or PUl) ~J;islL. r J~l;lll .l~m ~rJllcfl rc(JllC~l iirlJlc J)cvL'l~'r (~r JlJs assi~ncc. 2-S 3. ]hc mm.r vhar~ or r,:fincr~cr~t shah I.,.' compatible whh cxlu'mal adjaccnl ];md LmC~ m~d shall noL create dc~rin3cnlal impacts Io abutting hind uses. D. J hc I;dlm~i~ shall ix' deemed minor changcs or rcfinemcms: [~co))lJ~tlr;lli()n of parcels ~? gCClJOli 2.4 -I'this Iq;l). ~]llil,F cji;lilac'% ;LlJd rCJ]IICIIICIHS ag dcscrihcd ab. vt sh:]ll hc reviewed by appropriate CoHipIJ;II)cC %kith ;LII ~tppJicllbJc ('otillJy ()rdJRanccs and regulations prior JO lJl~ ('(ITIIIIIUIIiIk [ )cvcJopmc[ll and J~nvJrOllmCnlaJ Ncrvjccs Administrator's .~dHlJiliMr;~lor oJ';i IllJRor cJlallg~ or refinement may occur ]ndc~ndcntJy ~ronl and prior t- ;m~ application for Su~ivision or gJle l)evelopmenl Plan approval. however ,uch appnwal shall not conslJlulc ao at~lhoriz;~lion for development or implcmcmalitm of thc minor d~ange or refinement without first obtaining all other 2.10 IHJI']I,IMINARY NITIJI)IVI.K[ON PI,AT PIIA~ING h] thc cxcnt pl;iHmg is required, gtJhnlission, rcxicw. ;md approval of l'rcliminarv Niihcil~i.i.n ['la:~ Ik,r Lhc pr(~jcct may hc accomplishcd m pha~s h) co~cs~n I with tJl~' planned dexcl.pmcn~ -ffl~c propc~). 2,11 OPEN SI'A('I'; AND NA'I'IVI'; VEGETA'FION IIE'I'ENTION REQUIIIEMENTS '1 hc I'1 ;I) will compl.~ x~i~l~ Section 2.6,32 and I)ixision 3.g of the 1.I)C relating lo Splice ;md retention of' native vegetation ~I'I~FA('I.: ~ A'I'I'~R .~IANAGI':MI':NT I)LIFSU;illl Itl dcicgalion l?om thc SFWMI), Collier Count.,,' will issue thc surl~ce water Jllanagcnlcnt permit fi)r the water management system which will be designed 2-6 accordancc ,.',ifil thc I",ulcs of the F,(mfl~ FIc)rida \Vmcr Management l)islrict (SF\VMI)). ('haplcrs 41)1i-4 and 2.13 ENVIIIONM ENTA. I. ,\. An Imvirtmmcnlal hnpact Statement waiver was requested by the I)cvclopcr and appl,,vcd bx thc ('oilier ('t!tlllt.'¢ Plallnil/[/ SetwiCCS I)t'naRIllcnt. l~nvironmcnlal Rcxicx~ Section staff duc to prior agricultur, fl activities on thc sim. pursuant Scctit,n ) 8'I tfllhc I,alld l)cvc~oplllCnt (5ode. il. t )tl~c~ pcnmt~ will bc obtained l?om applicable State. Federal and l.ocal agencies as appropriate. 2.14 I q'II.I'I'IES All ncccs~.~r} ca,cmcnts, dedications, or olhcr instruments shall bc granted to insure the cm~tinucd opcr;tmm and maintenance of all sca'icc utilili¢~ in compliance with applicable n:gulatitms in el'loci ill thc linlc appro; als arc rcqucslcd. 2.15 'I'RANSPOIITATION A. '1 he Developer shall provide appropriate Icft and/or right turn lanes on lmmokalee Road and tLS. 41 at fl~e project entrances. Such mm lanes shall be io place prior h, thc issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy fi~r a usc that ulilizcs thc pcrspcclixc associ,~lcd cnlral~cc. B. 'l here shall he lhll access, signalized intersections al tile projcci's eastern entrance on hnmokatcc Road and ILS. 41 cntnmcc at 107fll Avenue. Thc Developer shall prm idca Iktir 5hare cmllributim~ low;u'd Ibc capital cost ol'Iraffic signals. Future access points to hnmokalce Road and U.S. 41 are those sh.,wn on thc (iranada Shoppes Master Plan. Access m U.S. 41 is subject lo approval and permitting by FI)OT and locations may bc modified from those sho~n on thc site pkm a~ dcicrmmcd during linc permilling process. I). Arterial Icxcl street lighting shall be provided b5 thc Developer at ~he project's nlaiu clllrallces ill COBjUllCtiOI1 ~tilh the devcloplllClll of these enlranccs. [. Road impac~ thcs and credits shall bo in accm'dancc with thc pmv~sions of I kdinancc t12-22, as amended. 2-7 ~ 2.16 (i()MMON ,\I~I.L,\ .M,*'.INTI'~NAN('E (-'onlllll.)ll area IIl;lililell~lllCC. including Ill[iJllJenancc sxslcm w I ~ pr-~idcd b} Iht Developer. 2.17 I)ESI(;N (;I'IIIE . X ',S ANI) S'I'ANIIARI)S A. Thc ('oilier ('~mnb lqanncd t]nit l)cvclopment District is intended m encourage ingcnuib, immvalion and imagination in thc planning, design nnd developmenl rcdcvclopmenl nf relatively large Iracls of land under uni~cd ownership as scl forth in thc l.J)('. Section ..... (. B. Granada Shoppcs Pi'I) is planned as a timctionally interrelated commercial site under unified c~,nlrol. Thc I)cvclopcr will cslablish guidelines and standards ensure qua[ily Jbr bolh thc common areas und thc indivkhml parcel developments. All dcvch,pmcnt will complement and enhance I.DC l)ivision 2.g. Architectural and SiJc [)esign Slamiards and Gnidelines. ('. Thc Grm ~d Shoppc~ Pi ~[) will I~aturc an inlcgratcd alld compalihle urchitccturnl buiklmg sbic or theme. ~d*ich ~ill be incorporated into thc primary retail center. and all [?cc slamling uses. Massing of buikting Ihcades will bo reduced by lransitinning btHlding heights, wkhhs nnd colors, and adding archilcctural eJemenls such as loggias, canopies, comer lowers, archways, columns, cie.. which will Ibrm cmirl)ard-likc areas, appropriately scaled Ibr ~ublic gathering spaces. These Ircatmcnls ~ilJ create visual interest and variety, while providing visitors to thc pro ecl ~ pcdcslri;m-l?iendly almosphcre. Buikling architectural styles shall ~ cumpaliblc and complemcnlag' throughoul pn[ject, ami shall [balnre unifying and CoIllpJclllClllar} CJglllgnJ5 such roof Iroahncnls. signagc. JandscapJng illld huilding ma!cHaI~ ami building I 1. Thc Granada Shoppcs P[ ;I) will bcn lhlly inlcgraled planned silo. wi'ere atlcnlion m Iht overall site design is achieved hy providing well designed al;d integrated vehicular use areas, pedestrian paths, and archilccturally unific,l signage. landscaping, alld lighting throLIghoLJl thc site. ~i[I he designed wilh slrcelscapcs Ihat create pcdcslrian-fl'iendly cn~inmmems. S~reelscape plans will be designed hierarchy of ~chicular and pedcsMan flow wilh I~,ndscape improvements nppropriale in scale and characler wilh lh~ Ihncfion 12B2 ' o[ lhe ~;treel al~(] ;id ilcefll kllld u:.,c~,. 'the intent i~ 1o link uses throtJghout thc project b~ designing appropriately located and scaled pedestrian and vehicular circulati.n routes. I'r~tjcct archilcclural Ikaturcs will he developed xfithin co111111Oll ;.cas of Iht pm]cci and will *c c ~ ~rdin':lcd in design, color, and ~tx lc Architectural I}alurcs shall bc pcrr 'tied lhrottg]mt]t thc silt. appcalitlg, iu'tictJlalcd, idcntil]ablc path .I entry xchidcs [rom thc internal drive to thc site and [rOlll the site lo thc buiklings themselves, l'hc orientation of a building or structure ~Jpnll a silt ~ill n.t only reflect thc pr{liter's Functional need. but x~ ill also be responsive to thc individual parcd's characteristics and relationship Io Iht pm cci and vehicle and pcdcstrian access ways, When adiaccnl I. a pr.joel lake. buildings may bc orlcntcd lo thc lake ~ealurc and may proxidc &cks. x~alkwavs, and/or scaring areas adjaccliI Io or o/cf Ibc xqtlcr l~ature, depending upon thc u,n}p;~tilql)? ,4 such Jealtlrc% a ith lhe l? pc .f husincss Iocalcd on Ilk' Xtchilcclural standards. I)csign cJcmcnls >hall be compatible ;uld c.i]lplcrllC~llar5 with the architectural Ihcmc uf thc pn[jcct, i;~chJding but g n;terials mo'nmtcrials. c. -rs. signagc, lighting, and landscaping. fhJilding lighting design will be ar'cJlileclulally Ircalcc ill thc slyle ,4 Iht building archilcclnrc. SJmilarls styled pcdtslrian level Ii:hi, g ixlurcs will be totaled ahmg all ;:cdcJstfian pall:ways. I.imdscaping: I.andsca~ design guidelines Ibr free-standin~ uses will crcalc a rml nj{ us and tisttatly pleasing landscape Ihal cohesive m~d cnmplcmenlary Io Illc overall master landscape plan. 'Iht firanada Shop. s PUl) landscape concept will feature c-mhinalion~ of native planls alld ornamental varieties wP, ich will be designed 1. define anti accent pedeslrian and vehicul.:r spaces, dc4~m~ ~ill crcalc ;~ c.hcrt'nl Ihcmc. which Cnlplliisizcs m~Ucri. I .s a primar) unil~in~ cicmcnl. ~l~ I;,.d~c~q~c clcmcI~l~ ;fl,,nF puhlic R.O.W.s will bc c,,mplcmcmary t,, ~Ircctsc,spc landscaping, llcdge material R (IWs ~h;~II I~c i.smllcd mlj;~ccnl In Ibc parkin~ I'mucl c.lr]cs xsill I~c dcsi~ncd m h~rm~mizc wilh ~dj~ccnl I2) I..ndsci~ping mlUeri.l~ x~ill be ulilizcd m define Ibc main (~r;~ph3c~'~ign~gc Si~ ~r.phic5 scr~c m provide c~illJllu~l)' design fi,r ~dl ~ign~ge in thc pr~4ccl, c~msJslcnl wilh Iht ~vcrall xi~u~l imprcssi~.~ of Ibc pn,iccl. All llllulumcnl sJgllilgc sb~,ll bc h-u.;cd ~ithin ;m ~rcbilcclur~,ll~ umf. rm ~ig~n ~IrllClllrC. 2.18 I.ANII~CAI'INI;, IIEIIMS, FENCES AND WAI.I.S nd~ping I~'r.~x. IL'noes ~lnd x~fils ~rc ~rmiltcd ~ i~ prmc~p~d usc Illro~lghoul Granada NJlop~s. Rcquirctl hul'lgr Irc,flnlClllS shiflJ lcrminalc ~I chit, races 1~ ilCCOI~IllI~Ic cnlr~mcc Irc~lllllcI~Is i~lxJ ;~I I;d c~ I,, ;~cc..ml,~d;~lc views 3nl~ ll~c pr~,.jccl. 'l he fidl.wing sl~mdards shall ,~ppI): 1 m~d~c~pc buJlor~ c~mliguou~ l(~ lmm.kalco I~ad R (}.W. and I1.S 41 ~ill be ', ' I1~Ii ~IC'(, ;II Ibc IJIllC {~I' ~iIC dcvch,pmcnl c,r subdJx IxJOI1 i~pro',cnlcflJ flfld Xlitlillllllll x~idtil ~,t 20'-(" measured lr.m Iht pro.fly linc. Thc mmimu,~ n;.i~bcr ,,l' required I&'c~ sJl;llJ be citJcuJillcd al J Ime.r loci. I'lanfings sh;~ll mu be required mbc pl~lnlcd ~n ZS' ~cfllers in a JJfIL'~IF :ll;lllllCt. bill IlliIV ~' ch[~tcrcd -r pl~mlcd itl irrcguJilr pilllcrn~ to pr,,~.lc glo;iici but'l~rs m ccrl~lJn ;irca~ ~md lo pr*,vide view c(~rri(Iors of Ibc hc~hl .f' required frees wilhm lhe bul!~rs shall be 12' ~n liver~ge. ('~m-p3 I~cc~ sIxdl bare ~l 6' c;mopy spre d iii lhe lime iff planli,;g ). I lcdF:s. ~hcrc required b)' thc ('.llicr ('-unly I.and I)evcl~pmcnl C.dc ti i)(') sh;df be insfallcd in ~Icct~rclancc ~i~l~ l.l)(' Division 2.4. I ,red.taping and Buffering. J.iJtldsci~pc bu~]crs C(~DI~gLJ(~LJ~ I~ Ibc agticullurally zoned parcel immcdialcly cast -f Ihe ~ ir,mada Shoppe~ shall be a Type "A" buffbr .nd will be c h,sraclcr~.~ics: .umber .f required trees shall be c.,Iculaled al I Irce per 30 2 ~ ,..p~ lrcc~ will be pl~m~cd al an initial hcJghl ~f 12' ~n average, wilh a r,' ~prcad (' lmm sc pc ~uff~'rs c~nfigm~us Io Ihe l~clican Marsh I'lfl) slmll ~. Type "A" buffer. I i~ndgCilpc buffers, bcrms. Icncc~ and ~alls may I~ c.n~lrucled allmg .f Iht I,~,.~ada Sh.p~,~ l'l~l) h~und.ry c.ncurrcnl ~vJl[l ~Jle devclopme~ or E, SitJcw~lk~. ~i~nagc. ~ulcr fnanagcnlcnl syslcm~ drainage ~lftlcltt~. pm cci ;re ~i cclt~;~l f~';lli~rcg ;~nd tflJJllJc~ ~hall he ~rmilted within Jand~l~ buf~crn c<mtig,.,.~ ~, a pr,,~'rl) line alld/.r right--f-way line znay ~ conslmclcd sucl~ 2,19 I All ?r.und ..,unlcd pmicct and I~ce.~landing usc ~ign~ ~lmll t~ ol consis[cnl ;u~hilc~lur;~l .~lc anti ~hall fcatnrc Pike buildin~ nmtcrial~ and ~JgH slrucl,~tcn. Sign 2. Pursuanl I~ Sec ~ 2 5 5 2.3.7. ~f Ihe I,DC, Ibc fifthly'lng c-ndifi~m~ required c~,mprehensivc sign plan fi~r (l~e {iranad~ Shopl~n. All sigfl pur~uanl Io (',,llier C~,unfy Division 2.~ shall ~pply unle~ ~llch ~egtllfll~c. fls ar~ -ccupanc') p;~rccl of Il.id lot Ibc pt rp~ ~cg .F Ihi~ I'l~l) fi,r sign.~e Itl he t,c IK'rmJ!lcd f. cxlcnd ~l~;vc ibc ;n;tximum Jlci~hl o[ Ibc sJ~ll s~cificd 1 2B2~, 2-12 I'I'I)I'SII~I,\NI'\III'A \'YNI:I\V()RK sho~n o,u, ci,tLr.~U) on the I'liJ) hi;islet I'lan, Thc pedestrian s)'stcm will ;11 lh¢ mcrlJJlcic~ ,,J lilt' projccl she. hy providip~ a landsca~.d walkway j~lOlt'~lctJ iii,IH '~cJ~JctlJil[ Ir;ll~J~· II)o~CIIICI)I~, /~ ~V [¢(JJlir~tl J~rcllkS ill lJl¢ pcdcslrim, m'I'.,.,,~k (k~r vchicul;lr ;Ic(c~s lo thc silo shall J~ idmllified ;q~phq~)ma~c h, ~c,h:cc Iht ~pccd ,q' ~chiclcs and provide saJg Jk'dcslrJdll l l)c ~h,,ppHl~ area ~dcslrkln way (Exlfihil A-I) shall I,c a wide mlctm~llt'))Jl~ covered ~aJkw~v J~alur[~l~ pavRrs or sl;lmpcd c,,~c~cJc ~t,l~ccs. This pcdeslrian way shall include archileclurnl I~'.~U~c~. ,Iml dccoralivc Imxlscapc planlings. 'lhis p;llhxvav shall lilt ~,1 ~ztx~ ;uCa pcdcslriim ~,'w (I.xhdm ,\-2) shall I~ h,calcd I'.. Ih~s pcdcslrjan ~ay s)'{JClll ~ill h~ dcsignc, d o promolc ~.~Jc ;Hid ~on~clliclll linkage I~o1~1 Iht parking ;Ir~;lS I,~ bolh IbC Iliillillltllll of 14' in cOnClCtC ~tl' J~;ulded COllCrCIc pedcMrJa[1 p;llJl,v~lv. This ~dRslrJall p;LIh~dy ~;~)' will I~alur~ cmlopy . ~ ~c,p~. plantings. Canopy Jrgc5 or palms will I~ pla ~t~d within mljaccnl pinking landscape islands. Canopy Irces or pl;mk'd ;IJollg thc pedestrian way system and shall be a minimum 12' high with a 6' spread for canopy trees and equivalent spcc ificmion fi~r shade palms, at the time 'Ihe perimeter pedestrian way IExhibit A-3) system is designed to link free-standing uses with thc parking and shopping area pedestrian x~y as Shown on the PUD Master Plan. Vehicular crossings will be identified with signage, landscaping and clearly marked through use of varied pavement treatments or other traflic calming techniques. 'l'Ns pedestrian, v/ay svrtem will be a minimum of 15' wine and wul [eaturc a meandering 6' wide pa('cr. stamped concrete or concrete path with meandering landscape treatments. Seating shall be provided intermittently along thc pathway system, adjacent to punic use areas. 2.21 GENEI~L PERMI~ED USES A. ~n uses shall ~ considered general ~rmittcd uses fl~roughout the Granada Shop.s PUD. General ~itted u~s are tho~ uses, which generally sen,e thc Develo~r and te~ of Gmada Shoppcs and are typically pan of the common inf~cturc. B. General Pcmfittcd U~: i) Essential ~mices ~ set forth under LI)C. Section 2.6.9.1. ii) Water m~agement facilities ~d rclalcd structures. iii) Temporal' ~wage treatment facilities. iv) l.~cs including I~es with bulkheads or other archilectuml o' stn, ctura, ~mlk treatment. v) Architectural t~aturcs m~d clements including ~alls. l~nces, arum. g~*~N~s and the like. vi) Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Dc,.cloper s authonzed contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways. parking areas and related uses. ii) pc features v Landsca including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, benns. fences and walls Subject to the st~mdards set forth in Section 2,11 of this ~ PUD. viii) Fill storage subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.7 ofthis PUD. Site lilling and grading as set forth in Section 2.7 of this PUD. ,,':~ x.) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Servicc~: Administrator detcmfines to be compatible. xi) Kiosk vendors xii) Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein are to be in accordance with the LD(' provision in effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval. xii) Shared parking between the pr/mary retail facility and free standing uses shall be permitted throughout the site. 'Each free-standing use shall not bc required to provide 100% of the LDC minimum parking on the project site: however, the total parking provided for the Granada Shoppes shall meet or exceed the m'nimum parking required for the comOined land uses. 12R2- ,' 3-1 SECTION III (iOMMERf'IAI. 3.1 PURPOSE '[~c pu~ of this sccdon is h~ identify pcrmhlcd uses and ' :veiopment standards for ~e~s within Granada Shop.s dcsignmcd on thc Master Plan as Retail and Office. 3.2 GENE~L DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "~/(Y' (m thc PI 'D Mas~cr Plan arc intended to provide a mmximm of 300.000 ~uarc t~'ct (gross building arca~ of retail, (dficc and service uses on a m~ximum of 32 acres Atoms indicated a~ "()" (m the PUl) Master Plan arc intended exclusively for genera] and profcsqonal oFf]cc u~'s and [~nnit a maximum of 90.000 squat feet (~ross building area). Earing and Drinkin~ Places shall not exceed 25% of the project's mml retail commercial square fi~otagc, unless additional parking spaces a~e provided for restaor~t 3.3 PERMITTEI) USES AND S'IRU("I URES No building or 51ruum~c o~ pa~ thereof, shush }x' crccl':d, ahcrcd ~H used. or hind used, in A. Permitted Principal {~scs and Structures: All pcrmmcd uses in Ibc C-4 Zoning I)istrJcl of :he Collier County Land Devcl~,pmcnt ('ode. us ~ffAugust 28. ]c~9~ except: A~ricuhurul Scrxiccs (groups r)TI Amu:;cmcms and Recreation {OuKioor-group., 794.8. 7992. 7996 and 7999) Automotixc Repair Facilities (7532-75391 d) }lospita]s {8062-80691 c) Mcm~'rship ~)rgar]i?; ::,ms {8611-86991 Outdo}or Retail Nurseries. ].awn and Cardcn Supply Stores (5261) 12B2 3-2 Marinas hi ' wnshops (5932) ( ruup ('arc 2 Kinsk \'endears kctml I t~m~c and Garden Comers f521 I. 525 ] } I'crmhtcd Acccss~r;, I ;scs and Slmcturcs Acccss,)r) uses and stmcturcr4 o~stomarily associated with phncipal u~s ~rmittcd in this district 3.4 I)EVf]I.OPM ENT S'l ANI)ARI)S A Mhfimuml,~l ~rca' ' 2( )IISI Princ:p~d Pc~n~ittcd ['scs a} hnmokalcc }{d and 1'.% 41: l-,~n5 f~ct h} lntcr~: 'rmtagcl)nxch:liliccnlbm Watcrlr,mt: /.cr~, feet m'~ m bulkhead ,~r riprap at top rc bank Nlmimum Building Setback lmm Non-Right-olLWa? Pcri~netcr Pmiect BoundaO of PI 'I): ['ilt~ t'cct ~50') h~r buildings greater lhan 50' in heighl. 12B2 3-3 a) Frrmt Yard: i Roofi_'d parking fiicilitic~- I ',~cnl} Wet i20'1 b~ Side Yard: n R-ofed parking facilit*cs- ICh fec~{lO') c) Lake Bank: i. Common Architectural Features-Zero feet (0') Scaling area.s- Zcrn ~'cl (0') D. Maxmmm Ilcfght: Retail Buildings;: l ~o-54nric,< na~ t~ cxcccd 15~}y ~,:~ (50'). 2Office Buildings: Four-stories. not ~o exceed sixty tbet (60') 3Architectural I~atures: Scvcnt?-fivc fed (75') 1282 _ 12B2 EXHIBIT B ~ I 282 ~'rorn ~ne northwest corner of Section 27. Townsmp '-8 South. Ronge 25 Eost. Collier County. Florido run S,00'58'~5"E. olonq (he ~e., tine of the northwes~ I/4 o~ said section 27 ~or 125.02 ~eet to o ~s ~nte~secUon with The sou[herly right-of-way hne Immokolee Road (CR-846) and ~he POINT OF BEGINNING. [henue run ~ ~ ~1o~ ~he sou[had7 r~h[~of..w~7 I~ne of -- .~ 99 feet; thence run S.89'45'00"[. *ne southerly r~ght-,Df-way tlne of said Immokalee Road for 57~.45 ~eet: thence run ~.86'53'I5~E. along the southerly right--of-way r,ne of said Immokalee Ro~d for 500.61 feet; thence run 389'45'00"E ~ong the southerly right--of-way line of sa~d Immokatee Ro~d for I~4.22 feet; th~nc~ ~n S.00'00'00"E. for 224.53 feet to a point of curvature; thence southwesterly along 'h , e ore of a curve to the right o~ rodius 85.00 feet (delta 90'00'00") (Chord 120.21 ~eet) (chord bearing S.~5'00'00"W.) for ~33.52 feet 'o the end of sc~d ,curve: thence run S00'00'00'E fo~ 330 91 feet to '; point c~ curvoture; thence southwestedy along the ~rc of ~ curve to ~he r~ght of radius 50.00 feet (delta 86'5~'07') (chord 88.77 feet) (Chard bearing 5 43'ZT'03-W.) for 75.84 ~eet to a point o~ tangenc~ thence run S.86'54'07'W. for 258.52 feet to a point of curvature; ,h.nc~ ~esterlx along thc arc o~ a cu~e to the right Of ¢6dius 936.00 fe~t (d~lta 06'23'~4") (chord I04.29 f~et) (chor~ beorlng N.Bg'54'lG"W.) for i04.34 feet to the end of s~id cu~; thence run S.13'26'3~'W. for ~48.97 feet: thence run S.69'14'15"W. for 258.29 feet: thence run 3.00'39 5'E. for 25.00 feet; thence run S.89'20'45'W for 396.46 feet to ~ point on the west line of said Section 27 and ti~¢ easterly right-o~-~e ._ Tem~imi Tr~' thence run N 0~/38'4~'W. ~long the ~est llne o~ said :4eolian 27 and said e~st~rly right-of-way line of U.S. 41 for ~670.23 feet to the POINT 0F 8EOlNNIN0. containing 39.23 acres more or less or 1,708.858.58 square feet more or less. Bearings hereinabdove mentioned are based on the ~est Line of Section 27. Township 48 South. Range 25 East os being NOTEs: 1. THIS IS NOT A 2. BASIS OF BEARINGS 15 ~E NOR~ UNE OF ~E NOR~ST I/~ OF SEC~ON 27. TO~SHIP 48 SOU~, RANGE 25 AS BEINO S. 89'45'00" E. 3. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS. ~ES~VA~ONS ANO RESTRIC~OMS OF RECORD. 12~]2 1 .B2 ' STATE OF FLORIDA) COD?4Ty OF COLLIERI i, D;'/IGHT R. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the ~entieth Judicial Circ~ it, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing Js a true copy Of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-91 Which was adopted by the Board Of County Commissioners on the 10th day of ~;ovember, 1998, during ReGular Session. WITfSESS my hand and the official seal Of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this /3th da]' of November, 1998. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Ex-officio to Boa~ County Commissione_r~ i By: Ellie Ho f fman Deputy Clerk ,~l~vcnl~'r I(}. 199~ From: Bcvcrb C. l)avis~m. I~rcsidcnl Greater Inl[~ria[ Boa;d '~.'c arc hcrc rcprc~.nting thc r;cishN~rhol~ds .fln]pcrhll ill north ('oilier ('otmty. It is our u~crslandin8 thai Ibc ('(~unl) has plan:, lo allu~ thc nc,.~ pro~d dcvc]:~pmcnl office 'lamiami Prol~ss~.nal ('Oilier h~ cxil t~llh~ ]m[~'rial (hdf'('mir~' Bl',d. ;i prixalciy c ned slrccl. Imf-rial (i~fil ('mirr~' IHxd i. Ibc ~.lc cnlr)and cxil Ihr .ur nciUhl~rho.ds. At prc~nt, there arc appruximatcly 3.UOO rcsidcnl xchiclcs using our strccl und Ibc Iralt~c [ighl a~ Ibc intcr~cfiou of RT 4 l. Plus. anmhcr I.DOf] ~chiclcs I minimum) gn througl~ thc ~'r~ ~cc already a xcr7 hus~ inlcr~clion ;md our ncighN~rh~od is yet I~, ~' c-mplctcd. Prcliminar~ plans .l'lhdc M.nhcs ~ As~ciatc~ mdicalc parkinE s~ls fi;mard buildings and an.lhcr tJ s~ls fi)r thc aasistcd lixinF c{dlagcs With such heavy traffic developments using 1he pri~alc drixc ~hind ('mnin's. S(3 ~lr. our n~islcr as~,ci;ItJ<m. {Grcalcr Imperial B.nrd). has lakcn care resurfacing, rc-slriping, and repair .1' Imperial (;nil ('.ur~ Blvd. Our l~tstcr association has handled all drain;igc and x~alcr pr-hlcms .All ligMinF and hlndsc:tf~Jng 'Iht l~lslcr as~)cialim~ has had m h;mdlc Ibc cxlril c~slx tH Iral]~c J}om thc Im~rial Plaz~. Iht Nil(' I Icallh ('arc l:acilib' and die medical huildmff .n Hw c.rncr. Ib' adding additional public Irafl]c onto this prJvalc r~)ad~a). )'mi ~ill intreat' <mr cost~ ~uhstantially Io continue to n[linlain this roadway and surrmmdm8 area. W~ do ~ol t)clie~e I~1 priv~l~ r~ide.ls s~ould be f~.di.l,' and m~inlai~i~ public u~e. Wc ask lhal Iht ('ounly lake nvcr rcs~nsihilily fbr Imr~rial (MJf('our~ ~Jvd ~lwccll R'I 41 and Ibc guardhuu~', and thai >mi dcn> l'urthcr puhlic access 1o Imperial (;o[fC,mr~' Blvd. unHI such lime. Thank you fi~r .vour cum;idcraliun 1½cvcrly C. Davisson 131 (X)-(i7 tlamihon I larbour l)r. Naples, I:lorida 341 I 0 Phone 594-XSX I Fax 594-gl 75 · 12B 2 ~lv name ~tNed R~,b'~ nsl a ~ ct rcm v t c Residen l)irccn r ~,Fl'ark Place Xhcs ~ Imperial" G.If I:states'"'O'OT'~ea agutts, and wdl bc alFected by the pmp.sed plan tinder consideration by ~he l~oard ot ( ~lhcr ( OLmt~ ('ommlgglo~ers today We question thai ibc properly revolved qualifies fi~r idcntil~canon as a multi-use PUD We believe that Ibc narrow 2~(~' width ~Ffhis prope~v which ha~ been s~'r~in~ as a hmhed water shed in~dlicicn: m ace.mm.dale these purp.~cs ~+lh Ibc T1tinl)~C~ .F huddin~s, roads, parkin~ ~rnpc~,ic~us area. calculated at 4 ~°o (d't(~lal ,.pace.can hc dccci~t~xc (~n a tc~lal width of 2()0 ~c questi(~n that ~hc pm[~er~ can he utilized in the nlanncr pmp,~sed ~g~thout negative consequences Fhe land indicamd as a conservation resc~'e m fl~c plans might well be so designated as ~ ~ currently serving as is much ofthis land.as a x~aler rtm-otTarca to Itorsc ('reek Acc~)iding I(~ the silc plan. almost t~nc-tialf ot'thc pcr~ ii,us land x~ill become imperious Further ~cd~nm secanx finaiizan()r~cfi'thc number(ff'pa~kinu spaces ,~rc '.~e to assume that ~'e al~ believe Ihal Iht drainage m~prl~vcrncnl~ made this ',ear ;il mc ca~tem end oI'PPW may be dcgrada~ion of ~his prcsumahl~ I]n.d c~mln~/a;ea caused hv thc chrninal~un (~F permeable land~~ While tubers will speak to thc use r~r lmFc,al (i(~lf('~)ursc I{lxd as an exit fur the proposed enlity. I wish ~o nolo here thai Imperial ()o11' Estalcs has alrcad~ been placed in jeoFardy w~thoul adequale hurricane cxacuali(~n fhcilkics It has nnlv (mc cx~i .n a mad fha: more than one ni~hl of gate that has taken place withmn due rc~ard f~r waler N*~w Ihe ('ommissioncrs are being asked m approve a cha,gt in zoning ¢.~r a PUD so. ne 200 feel wide As abutting property owners we believe that there is an ordinance xvhich prot~f ~ such owners from beinB flooded by new constR~cti.n We ask the ('.mmissioners to thoroughly investigate the actual potential danm~e m tls [~om this pn,poscd development Thank ~' i f'C' t' -,. , 0 1998 B~ard of Cnunly Comrm~*,ncr~ el. comm. rec'd copy ~01 Tamiami Tr;~il F.a~l rc~idencc~ ~m JiJTltl ;Hid JOSlh A',enue N WIHIe rc-v~kllnW h,,tr~c~ ah,rl~ [hexe ;ivellucs lo cullecl their ii ~ cxlremel) ddflcuh l~p gel rc~p-n~c~ m a pclili~m in ,Naplc~ I~;,rk hecalJ~e uf {l~e high ~rccnlage {ff ~,,nccrned ;ib,~ul {he ~;duc ,,I dl('~r [~r,~])CrllC~ ~l~ml kllew ,ih,,H[ Ibc Pirie Ridge tlickory Bird problem The Barr(m C,Ilicr C(mlpany is planning Io huild a major sh(1ppmg center and oftlccs across from Naples Park bigger Ih;in Iht Carilhm sh,pping center ()n Airp()rl R()ad ;)nd Pine Ridge Road, plus tw() office lowers. Thcy phm t. linc up thc main c~trancc I'rmn [~S 41 with !07Ih Avenue N a~ld make it a sig~mlcd intersection. This means anyone t}om the west or norlh of us and anyone from Naples Park can (and most ccrlainly, will) zip al,ng 107Ih or 108th 1o gel Io Ibc shopping cch:er, posl o~fice, office buildings, or the Crccksidc C,mmerce Park. l, addition Ibc C(~tmty w;mts a road built inlo project providing an easl/Wesl access bclwecn Ooodle~le Rd and US 41. This would conncc~ lo 107d~. We kr~,,~, From II~c ['mc Ri,I?: c'xpcric~cc lh,t Ibc c',, thr-u~h lrall'ic will hc h(;rrc~dous wilh 107lb bc~ui~ thc brunt. RcsJdc~ls livi.g al-~ Ibc n;~rrow, ~ir~d~n~ section in thc gOO block shoukl especially hc c.nccr.cd, [~cl.rc Vandcrbilt Be.ch R~,ad e~tcnsio~ was built IJJckory Bird had a daily trafllc coun~ .r over IO,O00 vchicIcs per day~ And ii was not lined up wilh a major shopping center, [t simply provklcd ;) quick cut-through lo US 41 from G.odk,.IIc Rd. So you can sec wJia[ will happen to 107Ih and lO~lh Avcmx~s il'we do nol lake action now. ] am adam;rally opposed to aI]owin~ our The cut-lhrotJ~h cr~/'llc is :drc~(ly q~ile high .r~ 108d~, II ~ill o.lv i~crc;~sc when a major shoppin~ 8th Ct East, (Sec over) As s-,n ~s US 41 is six-laned the access to 109Ih will he cul off~s ix 110th already. Mosl of us already usc I 1 lth Avenue to come ami go as J[ i~; easier thal~ crossing tile highway, So closing 1071h ;md 108ih w~ll nol cause any dJsrupd,n or inconvenience to the residents Besides having our quiet way o[' IJl~ altered by thc c(mst;inl stream and r.,r of ail this traffic it will also devalue ~)ur ]V)IIICS. V/Ilo would w~l lo btl)' ~1 ];(~tl~;c Oll [~ m;tj.r road v/ilh over 10,O00 vehicles tearing up and down lhc r..d all day. and cvcry day? Noodle. This problem will be addressed on N(~vcmbcr 101h whc~ Barton Collier Company prc~ent lllei~ plan the Board of County Commissioners. We need to be there and we need lo pull together to protect our homes, This will be our o~1c chance to make thc CommJssJoHcFs IJstc~l to our col~ccf~s Those can altend thc Commissioners meeting on Nov 10th should do so even if they do not wish lo speak. Seeing a crowd of concerned Faces is what is important, EVI3RYONI~ should read and fill out attached fi)tm, You doWt even nccd to m;fil it, just c;dl mc and I will pick k .p at your house, Yours truly, Vcra Fitz-Oer[~d~Prcsidcnt Property Owners of Naples Park Telephone: 597-5648 Email: verafgC~,n~pIcs,net Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East ,Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We are most concerned about tile plans to line up I07tb Avenue North with tile large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the ceoter. Tile desired southern boundary road in tile project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at tile other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to I07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with tile Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th arid 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across tile high,,vay. Additional comments: Yours truly. Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commisskmers 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, ,. 7, . are most concerned about tile plans to line tip 107th Avenue Noah with t!~ large new shopping center on Irmv:::)kalce Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4hrouvh route into the center. Tile desired southern boundary road in the project litOring up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehlclcs per da)'. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. ami also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to an.',' avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next beSt solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Signature Name(s) (Please Print) / /- Addrex~ Telephone fiumber 12B2,*,i Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We C ~., 9._.~2t.'¢x._..~ are most c"ncerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4hrough route into the center. The desired southern boundaD, road in thc project li.kihg up with i07th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension ,.vas built that the traffic on Hickory Bl:'d exceeded I0.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also i08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th -"_.nd 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Plgse Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Cominissioners. JTWe 7~7 "[-~"-~'~'"7 AD.6)'--'CC, are most concerned about thc plans to hne up 10~th Avenue North with the large nc,.,,' shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut~through route into the center. The desired soudmrn boundary road ia *he prQec* linking up w'~th 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The',' did not have a major shopping center at the oti~cr end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a Iight linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 10~th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collicr plan, a resolution to close I07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have Ieft turn directionaI lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Si~nalu~' Name(s) (Please Print) ¢' Address fh 7 / Telephone numar 1?_B2 :'q Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamianti Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We 4~5/ /~,P ,~ 7'~,~_ ' ,(',/-/' ,S are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th ,-,.veriuc North wiS'~'tt-~e ~a~ge ne',',' shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This ',,,'ill cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road m the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Rklge experience before, the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bh'd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107d~ at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseslme around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly'. Sign~5}lre / Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, .we . !c,:, X. ,' arc most concerned al, out the to line up 107th Avenue Nortl~ with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41, This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road ia the project linking up with i07th will make matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge ex~ience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hicko~ Blvd exceeded 10.~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center ~ thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any a'~enue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collicr plan, a resolution toclose 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horieshoe arou~ 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a ~jor problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional commen~: ~ .~ / ~ ~%, ~v~/~ Yours t~ /' / . - Signature J Na'~c(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Date: ' ' / ' ' ' ' Board o£ County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Fiorkla 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We .<,/; ;'Z .-. ""___.'-' -<".._ ,_/??_/'~A'. ' are most concerned about the plans to line up' 107th Avenue North with thd'large new shopping center on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the [~roject linking up with 107th will m~ke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on tlickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the olher end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of thc commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Prim) Addres~ . ( -' '7 '" : Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. Io line up 107th Avenue Norlh with the large new shopping cente~ on ~mmokalcc Ro~d and US 4 I. This will cause 107~11 Io become a major cut-through roule iotu tho cenwr, The desired southern bounda~ road m the~ptoject linkin~ up wi(h lO~th will m~ke matlers worse. We know ~rom Ihe Pine R~dgc cxperienc~ ~ote (he V~flderSJJ[ Be~ch Road extension was built that,thc traffic oqJJickory Bird exceedtd 10,~ ~chJcles per day, They did not have a ma~>r sbopping~enter at the other end, SO tmagme whaJ is grfing to happen lo 107(h. and also iOgth a~ it links up to 107th at 8th ~o~r[ ~, We do not warn an accesx road with a Iight linking up lo an7 avenue iu Naples Patk, If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us. lhen we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolulJon to close 107th and 108tll at the ~nd of the commercial section, forming a hotsesh~ ~tound 8th Court g. This would b~ the cheapest and simplest solution to what will b~ a major problem, t~you do not approve closing these two avenues th~ the next be~t soludon is ~o have left turn ditectiooal lanes only into the shopping Center From US 41. N ~ , ~ nplcs Pork de. crves better than being destroyed by huge dcvelopmems across the highway Additional comments: Yours trulT. Signature Name/s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number J/We '-~/~ I. F~ _~' cJ7~&~rN __ are most concerned aboul thc plans [llillJCrS ~OrqC We km,w from thc Pine Rklge cxpcriCrlCe bcfi~rc [Jlc Vandcrbilt Beach R*,ld cxtcn~Jm) war Imilt th;it Ibc lraffic o11 Hickury [llvd exceeded 10.OfX) vehiclcq per d;~y They did r~**~ h;~ve n milj~r ~hopping ce~tcr ;~l thc od~cr end. So imagine wind i~ a s~nalcd infc~ccli~)n al [f)7ih Avcnllc is forced up,m u~. Ihcn we ask that you include. ah~r~g wilh thc [I;):r~m Collier pi;re, a rcsolu6on (o ch~c ]07~h Jnd ]08th at Ific end of chc;ipcq ami simplc~l solution Io what Mil bca m;~jc~r problem. Jr you do not approve hmc~ o~ly into *l~c sh~pping center from US 41 N;qqc~ Park deserves bctlcr than hcing dc~lroycd by hugc development, acrms thc highway. ~OtlrS (ruJy. Add~c~s / 33OI Tamialm Ti;iii J/We -" ',. ' / f~') ,"' ' ~ / arc mm;t corlccrncd abuul [JlR plaflS _~,~-.L.:-== :,,.~-~-..;_.--.:'--. .........~ '~' i/ hi line up IOXll~ /\V~llUC Norlh widl Ibc large IlCW ~Jltljl[llll}! cclw,.r oil hnlnokalee Road Ibc desired *otllJlCrll J)uuflthlo' road m linc pmiccl Iiiikln?. lip Wllh IUhh will Illakg IlJ;lflCrS worse ~Uc klloW ffJItll []lc PJllt: Ridge cxpc~cncc heft)re lilt VillldCfbJJ{ Jig;ich ~,c do lll~l W;llll all ;Ieee:iS road with a Jighl Jinking lip J,) any avenue in NapJcs Park, If long wilh thc Barr(m (7oilier phLn, a Ics(~Ju6on lo ch>sc IOTth and J()SJh at Iht end of YOLIr~ lrtllV -..~ S~gnalut~ "~r Addrc~ Telephone number Board of County Con/nfissimlers 330I 'l'ami:m~i Trail East N:lplcs, [:huida 34112 Dear Coilmlissioncrs, /We '~? q ~ '~ ~'~c /T"~ ~,' rc n~ st cunccrncd about the phms to linc up 107ih A~cnuq'North with thc large new shopping ccntcr on lmh~okalce Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into tile center. Thc dc:drcd s,mthcrn [5,)undary road in thc project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. Wc know frmnthc Pine Ridgccxpcricncc bcI'orcthc Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic oil Hickory Blvd exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day They did not have a major shopping ccmer at thc other end. So imagine what going2 t,~ happen to 107th. and :list) 108th as it links up t() 107th at 8th Court E. ~Vc do not w:lllt all access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection al 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with thc Barrm~ Collier plan. a resolutk)n to close I07fl~ and 108th at the end of thccommcrcialscction, forminga horsesNmaroundSthCourt [L This wouldbe cheapest and sinlpJcsl soJu[ioll k) what will he a major problcnl. If you do not approve cio:ling ihcsc two avcrlucs then thc next best solution is R> have left mrn directional lanes only imo the shopping center from [JS 41. Naples Park deserves hotter than bciug destroyed hy huge dcvclolmlCntS across Iht highw:ty. Additional conllllcnts: Yours trt!ly. ..... Notates) (gl'case Prim) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East .,','apres. F'J'orMa 34I 12 Dear Commissioucrs. I/We . ,4~,gtk ,NI'OL~- ~ r%. are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Ave'hue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 10'hh to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going Io l~appcn to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th 2r, d 108th at the end of thc commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have Ieft mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Par}: deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highwa.v. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Priqt)~ ,~ , ~ Telephone numar 10ate: //- !- C7< Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail F. ast Naples. ~lorida 34112 Dear (~ommissior~crs. ~ ~ F/~z &-/(~ are most c(,nzerned about thc plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immckalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-lhrough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with i07th will make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience bclk)re the Vanderbilt Beach Road cx~cnsion was bt~ilt ~ha~ thc [ral'~c on [lick,0ry I3[vd exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. Thcv did nn¢ ha',c a major shopping Ccnlcr at tilt: ()i}lCF c~ld. SO imagine what is going ti) happen to IO7~h. alld ;1]~o 1081h as it links tip to 107~h a~ 8th Court g. We do not want an access road wi~h a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107Ih Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolutioa ~o close 107th and 108fl] at the end of thc commercial secti()n, fi)truing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest s.lution to what will be a maj()r pr,~blcm. If you do not approve closine these twa avcrlucs then thc next best solution is lo have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. ?(aplcs Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcveh)pnlcnts across thc highway. Additional comments: Sign'~ture ,~ Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone n~mber Date: :" -- "' "' Board of County Ommfissioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 341 I2 Dear Commissiuners l/We :.. ' .. .... are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenu(North with the large new shnpping center on I~2okalee Road and US41. Tbis will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extcnsioo was built that thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the ether end. So imagine what is going rd happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up m 107th ar 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues 0mn the next best solution is to have [eft turn directional lanes only' into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across ~e highway. Additional comments: --~-t~:. ~._ . .... ::.--~ .... . / -, , -. ~ / ..... ] ,; . Yours truly, Signamre Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of Coumy Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Comtnissioners, to line up 107th Avenue Nor[h'~h the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in ~e project li~ing up with 10~th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Rifge ex~fie~c ~fote t~ VarAe~bilt ~ach Road extension was built ~hat the t~fF~c on ~ickoD' ~1¥4 exc~ t0,~ Yehkc~ts ~t day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end'. b2~ Jmagihe wfiar i~ going to happen to 107th, anti also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Par~. If a signaled intersection at 107~h Avenue is forced upon us, then we as~ that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to clnse 107th ~nd 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only inu, the shopping center from US 41. Naples Par~ deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, S~gnature Name(s) (Please Pr~) ~e,4~C~ l~ Addr~[s Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to linCh/dp 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the pro eot linking up wifl'~ 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge e~:pericncc before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension v, as buih that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. The':' did not have a major shopping center at the other {'.nd. So imagine ,,,,'hat is going to happen tn 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court We do not ,,;,ant an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. Il' a signaled intersection at 107fi~ Avenue is forced upon us. men we ask that you i;-~clude, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th ,md 108th at the end of the commercial suction, fornfing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from tlS 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highv:ay. / Additional comments: Yours truly. Name(~) (Please Print) ~Z- /D 7~' ~v WT, Add'ess Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, -\ [IWe , ~ /'~ "~ ~.., ,, : . '"~It , .- T (~'t D'i are most concerned about the plans to line up i07th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Imm~,kalee Road and US 41. This ,,viii cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th ',,.'ill m'ake ma~ters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extensinn was built that Ihe traffic on Hickory Bh'd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da,.'. 'Fhev did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine ~vhat is ~oimz to happen to 107th, and also lOSth as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to arty avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and i08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to ,,,,'hat will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41..'qaples Park deserves better than being destroyed by' huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, S~gna£ure ' ' Name(s) (Please Prin0 Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We are most co.,:erned about the plans to line~Tl0;Ttin/Avenue North ivith the large nexv shopping center on Immckalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundao' road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ;vas built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is ~oing to happen to I07th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a Iight linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, alor~e with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closim, these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes ~nIy into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the high~ay. Additional comments: Yours truly. Address Telephone number Board of County Cnmmissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East ~ aplcs. Florida 341 I2 l)car ColllllllSSlO~Cr., I/~ ~_~/~/~ G~WZ~ZW~ are mos~ concerned about the plans toqine up 107tfi .Avenue North with the large new shopping center on I:5~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to beco~ a ma.jot cut-~rough route into the center. Thc desired soumern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We knnw from the Pine R~ge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was bnilt that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine wha[ is ~oin~ to happen to 107th, and also 108th ~ it li~:s up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road wi~h a lig~ Ii.lng up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 105d~ and i08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~ solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acres the highway. Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone numar Beard of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 l)ear Commissmncrs, 'I~V..c ~Z~d/ff~ ~' ~0~ ~ arc mo¢' concerned about thc plans to linc up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired soumern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd e~ceeded 10,~0 vehicles per da~. They did not have a major shoppingcemcr at thc other e~d. So imagine what is go}n~ to happen to 107th, and also 108th We do not want an access road with a lig~ linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. ato~g with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107:h and 108th at the end of thc commercial section, forming a horsesh~ ~ound 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next be~ solution is to ha~.c left mrn direction,al bncsonly intnti~cshoppingcentcr from US.~I. Naplcs Park dcscrvesbettertiaan being destroyed by huge developments acres ~c highway Additional comments:J~ ~ ~~~~, Yo~s ~ly, Signature / Name(s) (Please 073 Address Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 DearCommissioncrs..~ / ./~~ . . , ' and US 41. This will cause 107th tol~e~o~e a major cu~-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience ~fore the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.(~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center ar thc ,.:her end. So imagine what is going [o happen to 10?th, and aim I08~h as it links up to 107th a~ 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled interseclion at !07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to wha~ will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional tanes only into the shopping center from US 41. NapIes Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway Additional comments: Board of CounLv Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/~%~ 4~ Y/~ T //~ ~ ~/ /~/r/~ are most concerned abou~ lh~ plans to linc up I07d~ Avenue North with the large new shopping ccn~er on Immokale¢ Road and E'S41. This witlcausc 107[htobecomcamajorcu¢_~hrough route in~o thc center. The dzsired southern boundary road ~n the project !~nkin~ up v,'kh [07th w~!l make mat~ers worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before thc Vand~rbilt Beach Road extension was buih fl~a~ ~llc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 v~hicles per day. They did no~ have a m~0or shoppin~ center a~ thc off,er end. So imagine what is gohl~ [o happen [o 107lb, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8all Court E. We do not waat an access road with a light linkin~ up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~h Avenue is forced upon us. titan w~ ask flm~ you include, alon~ with the Barton Cotlicr pi,m, a resolution to close 107ill and i08~h a~ thc end of the commercial section, formiug a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapcs~ and simplest solution io what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closin~ fl~ese ~wo avenues then ~he next bes~ solution is to haw left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better lhan b¢in~ destroyed by huge developments across II~e highway. Additional commcn~s: Ynurs truly, Signature ~ Name(s) (Ple~e Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Floricl:l 34112 Dear Co~llmissioncrs, I/We c-J~'~"/v ,Y' ~r]/~.S77.f2./C 6'- ,~/ct~_cT/.?_&._ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalce Road and US 4I. This will cause 107thtobecomeamajnrcut-through route into the center. The desired s~uthern b~mndary mad in thc project linking up with 107th will make matlcrs worse. Wcknow from thc Pine Ridge experience heft)re tile VanderbihBeach Road extension was buih that thc traffic on tlick,)ry Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center iii thc odler end. So imagine what is going to happen m 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. Wc do not want an access road with a light linking up to any a',,enuc in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with thc Barren Collier phm, th,.: commercial sectkm, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court }'2. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what ,.,,'ill be a major problem. If you do not approve ch)sing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into tile shopping center frotn US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Additional comments:_ Yours truly. Signatu*~ Namctsl (Please Print) 7 Xddrcss I 1 2B2ml- Board of Coumy Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naptcs, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We I.~,~.~ ~~ are most concerned about the plans to lin~ up lO7~h Avenue North wi~ the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107~h ~o ~com~ a major cu~4hrough rou~ into th~ cenmr. Thc desired southern boundary road in th~ projec~ linking up whh lO7~h will m'ak~ mac,ers worse. We know from th~ Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road exmnsion was built that Ih¢ ~affic oa Hickory Blvd exceeded 10.0~ vehicles per day They did no~ have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine wha~ is ?ing ~o happen to 10Tall and also 108~h as 't I'nKs up to 107~h a~ 8th Court E. Wc do no~ warn an access road wkh a lighl linking up to any a,~cnu~ in Naples Park. If a signaled imcrsccfion at 107d~ Avenue is forced upon us, ther, we ask [ha~ you include, aiont~ whh dac Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~h and i08[h at th~ end of the commercial section, forming a horscshm around 8~h Cour~ E. This would be thc cheapest and simplcs~ solution k) wha~ will be a major problem. If you do no~ approve closing these two avenues ¢hen thc next bes~ solution is ~o have left turn directional [ancsonly'inmd~cshoppingccmer from US41. Naples Parkdcservesbe~terthan bch:$ destroyed by hujc developments across thc hishway. Additionalcommcnts:_~ ~U*L ~ ~O~.k ~.~, ~~__ Name(s) (Please Prim) Addrcss Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Traii East Naples. Florida 341 !2 Dear Commissioners, l/We _ , ,4-' ,' ........ ,-_2 ,5'.',/,','X'",-"~' ' are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. ]'his will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also i08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not ,,',':tnt an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with file Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to bare left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the higbway. Additional comments: Yours truly. s ignalure.5.~,~ .:,, /,'z "z'*' Name(0 (Please Prinl) ~,~-~'~' Address ,:., , 77.,0.. / --' Telephone number Date: /'/' / - Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We i/'~'i. 3n. LA.,3 i.'-. / / ~. 6-~..'~-'(-'~-~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue NoFi'h with the large new shopping cem,:*r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through rotate imo the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per (Jay. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what wiII be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naptes Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Sig'naturz , ,- _ _ -. - c--s 5,? .... ('.,'Z//:c-/Z, c, Name, s~? (?(Pleasc~ Print),,// (:i 7 /f~ ,,.'{~ f'/'~7~ "('-/:. ..., v/-/c/..5 Telephone number Board of Count.,,' Commissioners 3301 Tamiarni Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to line up 107th Avenue North wit~ the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cu~-through route into the center. ~,c ~esircu soulhcrn boundaiy road in thc project linking up with 107th wilt make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experieme before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on ~ickorv Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, thep we ask that you include. nlong with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the co~ercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8~ Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Yours t~ly, Signature Nam:(s) (Please~[im) ' Addres~ Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trai! East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. / I/W~._ ~.,z:¢k,~td, ,_..~ ~Z'. -r.'l;f are most c,Jncerned about the plans to line up 107th A~nue North with the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cutqhrough route into the center. The desired southern boundao' road in the project linking up with I07th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience belbre the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up ~o 107~h at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barron Collicr plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Name(s) (Please Print) , Telephone number I B~)ard of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We .. ~'-?r~ , __~ - ~ ./.-~z .~,- ~' z--, arc lnost concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with thc large new shopping center on Imtnokalec Road and LiS 41. This ,.viii cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired somhern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We knmv from thc Pine Ridge experience heforc the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was buih thai rile traffic on }tickorv Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da.','. They did r~ot have a major shopping center at lhe mher end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not ',,,'ant an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collicr plan, a resolution to close i07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then tile next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes on y into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highv,'ay. Additional comments: , ~'.,~.: ./~"7----~<-- '~--, ~..~-~ d~.-d..-~-~,~-~j_ Yours truly, Signature Name(s> tPlease P~int> Address Telephone numar Board of County C~mmissioners 330] Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34[12 Dear Commissioners. I/We ~re most concerned about thc plans lo line up 107th Avenue North with thc large new shnpping center on lmmoka/ee Road and US41. This will cause 107thtobecomeamajorcut_through route into the center. Thc desired southern boundary road ir~ thc pwject linking up with 107th will makc matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,~ vehicles per clay. They did not have a major shopping center at the o~her end. So imagine what is going to happen tr) i07th, and alsn [0gth as it links up to [07Ih at 8ill Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any a,,emm in Naples Park. If a signaled ir}lersection at 107th Aveuue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This woukl be lhe cheapest and simplest solutkm to what will ~ a major problem. If you do no~ approve closing these two avenues then (he next best solution is to have left turn direcli<mal Inncs only in~o the shopping center from US41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by bugc dcve[opmems across the highway Additional comments: '--'-' ' Addre~ ~ eleph,:',n~ number 3301 '[amh~mi '[r;nl East N'a?le~. Florida ~,lllZ Dear Commissioners. to linc up lhgth A'/cnuc ,N'nrlh with thc large new d~,,ppm~ ccn[cr on [rnmokalcc Rnad and I.;S ,Il Thi; will cause 107{h to, hcco~ a rna~¢,r t'Jt-[~lrouEh route into thc center. '[hc dc~Jrcd ~nnlhern houndar7 road in Ibc sro>joel lin~in~ up w~fh lO?ih will make matterswor~c. We k~)w from thc Pine Ridge experience heP)rslhe Va~erbillBeach Road extension was buJh th;a d~c traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded J0,~ vehicles per day. They did nor have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what going t() happen ro J07th. and also 108th a~ it links up ~o 107~h at 8th Court g. We do nnl wan[ an access mad with a Fight linking ~p to any avenue in Naples Park a signaled ;ntcrsccfirm at 107Ih A'/entJc i~ h~rced upon ~. lhen ?lc ask lhaf yoll include. along wi~h the t~arron Collier plan. a re~olaticm ro ct-<c 107~h arm 10gib al Ibc end of thc commercial section. P)rming a horsesh~ around S~h Court E. This would be thc cheapest and sirnplcsl solution lo what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing these ~wo avenues then the ~xt ~m soludon iq lo have left ~urn directional lanes only into [he shopping cenler from US 41. Naples Park deserves better lhan being deslroyed by hugs developments acres ~he highway - X 7 ~--r .......... ~ ..... ~ ................. Bo~rd of County Commissio~rs 3301 Tamlami Trail Easl Dear Commissioners, lo li~ up I~th Avenue Notlb wilh Ibc large ~w sht,ppit~g center on Immokalec Road and U5 41. This will cause l~lh lo ~c~ a major cut4hrcmgh route in{O thc ccnlcr, '[he desired southern boundary toad in lt~ project lJrikin~ up with l~lh will nlakc mat{cr~ worse. We know from I~c Pine RMg~ cxpcrJce<c ~foru Ibc Va~rbd Beach (l;~y They did n ,t have ;~ major ~hopping eenlcr al thc olher end. ~o imagine whal a ~ignalcd inlcrscctirm al 1071h Avenue ia forced upon us, l~n wc ask that you J~l~dc, ;dong 'with thc Barton Co[lief plan, a t~soIo Ion lo close 107lh ar~ 1081h at Ibc cfl(l thccummcrchd scclJon, forming a hor;csh~arour:d ~th Courl E, ThJ~would ~ chcapcst and ;implcq ~Mulion to what will ~ a m;qor problem, If you do nol approvc clo~ing thc~c lwo avcnucs lhcn thc ncxl ~sl ~[ulion is I~ have left turn directional Janet or)lF imo Ibc shopping ccnlcr from US 41, Naplcs Park dcscrvc~ ~llcr than being destroyed hy huge dcvcJopmcnl~ acr~.~ Ibc h~Fhway. Addilional c,)mmcnts: Yours truly,/ Addtc~ ~N';~plcx, I;I.rid;l 3.1112 ;md [JS ,11, This will c;~usc 1071h [o bccomc a m;~j~r cuI-Ihrough mule int¢ thc center, Thc de,if cd sutlllJcrfl h.utxl;iry road in die prQcct linking up with 107th will make (t;ty They &l n.I Im'c ;, ,1;¢)r shr~pping cch/er ;it thc r)lhcr cnd, S(> imagitlc what dml~. wilh Ibc Ibrrun (.'ullicr phm. a rcsoltltion [o ch)sc 107dl ;md 108dl at flit end die cc)l;lmcrci;fl scclic)ll, l'lH'lllillg il hurseshoe around 8Ih (7.urt Ii. 'riffs wc>u]d be linc chcllpcsl and simplcsl s~flutiun to wh;ll will }~ a m;,jur pr,~hlcm. 1t' you do not r~pprovc I;~tlcs ~);}Iy i[lh} Iix: shol~pirlg COllier l'r~)ill [.I$ 41. N;tplcs l';~rk deserves holler [haft hcin~ dc:~Ir.ycd h'/ ~ ,c dc'¢clr~p. Icllls ;~crt)ss thc highw;~y, Yours [ru]~'. Addrc~ 3301 Tamiaoli Trail I:'.asl Naples. Fhlrida 34112 [)ear COlllnlissiollers. m line up l()7fl~ ,,Xvcnuc N'~nh with linc large new shopping ccn~cr on hnmokalcc Road and [JS 41. This ,.~ill cause 107d~ lo bccoulc a maim' cut-dlrough route into tile center. Thc desired soutbcr~ bounclary road in d~ project [i~:kiu~ uF wid; lO?ih will make nlalicrs worse. Wc know fro/il [Ilo Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that Ihe mfffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did no~ havo a major shopping center at Ibc od~cr end. So imagine what is going ~o happen ~,> li)7tl{, and also 1081h as it links tip to 107tl{ at 8th Court E. %'c do [it)[ ~;1i/111[i access l'o;ld with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled in[crscciion at 107d~ Avenue is l~)rccd upon us, then wc ask tim[ you include. :dong wid~ d~c Barron Collier plim, a resolulioo lo close [(}7[h and I08th at lbo end of Ibc commercial scclion, Ibrming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be lhe cheapest aod simplest solution to what will be a [n[0or problem. If you do not approve closing [l~esc two ave~ucs lllen Ibc next best soludon is [o have left lurn directional lanes only into [l~c shopping center from LIS 41. Naples Park deserves better tl~an being destroyed by huge dcvdopmcnts across the highway. Addilioilal COIIlIIICniS: Namc~s) (Fleas¢ {'rin~ Address Board of Coumy 3F)I Tami:nni Trail E:lsl N:~plcs. Fh~rida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/~ //~'-.g. ,>/~~ arc most concerned about dm plans to linc up I07tb A~cn~orth w~th tl~c larg~ew shopping center on Immokalee Road and bS41. Tbis will cause 107tbtobecomea major cut-rhrou~h route into the ccntcr. 'Fhv desired southern ~ ..... ~ -, ,' . · ' ' ,x,u,,~.h., road in dm project un~mg up with 107ti~ wiii make matters worse. Wc know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Rand extension was built that Ibc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vdficlcs per dav. 'I'bcx did not have a major shopping center at tho od]er end. So imagine what ~oin~ to happen We do not want an access road with a light linking up fo any avenue in Naples Park. It' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then v,e ask that you include, along wide thc Barton Coiticr plan. a resolution to close 1OTtb and 108th at the end of thc commcrci;fl section, tbrming a horsesh~ around 8tb Coum E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing tbcsc two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional I;mcs only into thc shopping center from Ug 4I. Naples Park de~rves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional commcms: Yours ~ig~rc Namcls~ (Please Print} Telephone Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/~e.e ~/.c~ ~</.L~.~ ~,t~Z~',~e-;o/ ~ most concerned about the plans to line Up 107th ,Avenue North with ~e large nexv shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired snuthcrn boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We km)w from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanclerbilt Beach Road extension was built that the tratT~c on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a m~oor shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, :,long with thc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close I07th and i08th at the end of thc commercial section, forming a ho~eshoe around 8th Court g. This would be cheapest and simplest solution to wMt will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park al:serves better than being destroyed by huge developmenls across fl~e highway. Signature N~(O '(Please PrinO , / L, A~ress Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. i~t'[~ ~'~'e most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This wilI cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern bounda~ road in the project li~ing up with 107th will m'ake mauers worse. We know from d~e Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built ~hat the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day They did nor have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is ?in~ t,) happen ro 107th. and also 108th as it li~s up to 107tl~ at 8th Court E. We do not warn an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of dm commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only inro thc shopping center from US41. Naplcs Park dcscrvcs better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Name(s) (Please Print) Tel~phon~umb~r Board of Coumy Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'frail Eas~ Nap]es, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ..J/,-.i,/.;.,-T,. "'r,' ,,'. 'j,_',, r.2. '~,.~. "i""~:"</ ' ' · - - - ._.- arc most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North ~ith the large new shopping center on Immokalee P, oad and US 41. This wilt cause 107th to become a major cut.through route into the ccmer. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters v,'orse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to i07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. Il' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plao, a resolution to close 10?th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court 12. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the bill, way. Additional comments: Yours trul?'. Name(s) (Please Prim) , / Address ,' Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tam:ami Trai! Easl Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Comnlissioncrs. I~ ~t ZO~aTt~ ~6~ ~OM are most concerned about thc plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on hnmakalee Road and US4I. This will cause 107thtobecomeamajorcut-through route into the center. The desired southern Boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make ma~ters wnrse. Wcknow frmn the Pine Ridgeexpcricncchcforethc VandcrhiltBeach Road extension was built that fl~c traffic ou Etickory Bird exceeflcd 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major' shopping center at thc nthcr end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. alld also I0gth as it links up to 107th at 8th CouN E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. I[' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upnn us, then we ask that you include. nlong with the Barron Collier plan. a rcsolutioo to ch>sc 107th ,~r,d 108th at thc end of the commercialsccuon, formingahorsesboearoundSthCourt E. This wouldbethe cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues Ibcn thc next best solution is to have left turn directionnl lanes only into the shopping center from US41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional co~ents' O ¢~icZ ,O~ ~ ~ t~ o~ ~ours t~ly, N~mc(s) (Please Prim) ~& 10¢~ ~Ue. ~1 ~elcp~one number Board of Coumy Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail E~st Naples. Florida 341I] Dc;ir Co[llnl~sS~oIlcrs, lo linc up 1070~ Avenue North whh thc larg~ n~w shopping center on l[nmokalc~ Road and US41. This willcausc 107th;obccomgam;0orcu[qhrough rou[cintothcccnmr. l'hc desired souJhcm boundary road in thc proj¢ct linking up w~;b 107[1~ will make matters worse. Wcknow fromflm Pine Ridgecxpcricnccbcforcthc Vandcrbih Beach Road extension was buih that thc mtffic on }[ickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vdfic[cs per day. Thcydid nothavcamajorsboppMgccntcratthcnthcrcml. going u) happen to 107th, and also 10801 as Wc do not want an access road with a light linking up ~o any avenue in Naples Park, If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then wc ask fha[ you include, along with ;t~c Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108ill at the end of thccommcrcialsccfion, fl)rminga horscshoearoundSthCourt E. This wouldbethe chcapcstand simplcstso[utionto what willbca major problem. Ifyoudo nmapprow closing [JlCSC {wo avenues tbcu Ibc next best solu[icn is u) have left turn directional lancsonIy into the shoppingcemcr from US41, Naples Park dcscrvcs better than being destroyed by huge deveh)pmcnts across thc highway. Yours truly ~~/,/./ ~::~ . Signature ~ Name(s) (Please Print) . TetepMn~ numffer I Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tr~miami Trail F~ast Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ~ ,:. ~x~ '~{ ~ - ._ c ~.-~. ;-~,. arc most concerned aLout thc plans to linc up 107th Avenue North with thc large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US41. This willcausc 107thtobecomcamajorcut.throughrouteintothcccntcr. ............... : .... l~ h, ,lc ffroj~c, linking up wid: 107th will make matters worse. Wc know from thc Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc uther end. So imagine what is ?lng to happen to 107~h, and also 108th as it links up to 107th al 8th Court E. We do not want an access road wi~h a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at thc end of thc commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a majnr problem. Ir'you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best snlufio:~ is tn have left turn directional lancsonlyinto{hcshoppingccntcr l'rom US41. Naples Park descrvcs better than being destroyed hy huge devch)pn~cats across '.he highway. Additional comments: Board o( Coun£y C. ortnlliSSiOners 5.301 'l'ami;mfi 'l'r;fit East Naptcs. Florida 34112 Dear Conliil~ssiollcrs, I/We ~]/~ a J//~l / ~x ~/ ~ arc mos[ concerned about dm plans to line up 107~h Avenue North ~i~h ~1~¢ lar~ new shopping center on Immakal~ Road and US 41. This will cause 107d~ to beco=~ a major cutqhrou~h route imo thc ................. ~ ............. n~ up ,,vid} 107th will make matters worse. We know from dm Pine ~g~ ~xperi~ncc bdore th~ Vand~rbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Bird ~xcccdcd 10,000 whiclcs per day. They did not have a major shoppin~ c~ntcr at thc od~cr end. So imagine wbal goin~ to happen to 107th, and also 108th = it links up to 10?th at 8tit Court E. Wc do not warn an access mad with a lig~ linkJn~ up m any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imcrscction at 107tb Avcnu~ is forced upon us, then wc ask that you include, ah)n~ wid~ thc Barren Coliicr phm. a rcso~tion to close I07th and 108th at tt~c ~nd ~t' thc commercial section, forming a horscs~ arouod 8th Court E. This w{mld be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what wal be a major problem. Il' you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next b~t solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping ccnmr from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by hu~c d~vclopments across thc highway. Additional comments: : Yours truly, ~gnaturc ' '~/ . Name(s) (Please Prm0.t Address Telephone number 1282 Date: ,c'.~t'5'o~ Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. , I/'We' L.c,.c"_~. ,~ ~ are most cenccrned about the plans to line up I07th Avenue N~ w~ the large new shopping cen::r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a maim cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters xw)rse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extcnsinn was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not haven major shopping center at the other end. Soimagioewbatis going a) happen to 107th, anti also I08th as We do riot xvant an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, aloog with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, lbrming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these tv.,() avenues then the next best solution is m have Icft turn directional lanes only ioto thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highx~a>. Additional comments: · · _ / , 7 · ~ . -, · -~:,~:// ~ Name(s~ (Please Print) · ., ~ ' .~,' ~. ,.- r'~ ~,P,' 12B2 ° ,,~ Date: ,/~7 / Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We -~OO/X.O..~fi- ~"/t~7./~ ~ are most c~ncerncd about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with i07th will make matters ;vorse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da)'. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108Ih as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to dose 107th :~r,d 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directionat lanes only into thc shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being dcstr%vcd by huge dcvchopmcnts across thc high'.,.ay Additional comments: Yours truiy, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Date: .<C5// ' Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 341 t2 Dear Commissioners. to linc up 107th Avenue North thc large ne~v shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern bounda~ road in the project linking up with [07th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.0~ vehicles per day. They did not bare a major shopping center ar thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also i08th as it links up to 107th at 8tl~ Court E. W¢ do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107dr Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th apd 108th at the end of the commercial section, for~ng a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than beiag destroyed by huge devdopments across the highx~ay. I~,)ard of (]oun~?' ComitliSSiOltcrs .~301 lantian'ti Trail East Naples, Florida 3a112 Dear Commissioners. I/We.'f5 c_~.xz 1 ~'~L'} &--x ~* most concerned about thc plans to line up 107th ,,Xvenue No~th with the large new shopping center on Immokalec Road and US 41. 'l'bis will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m)ikc matters worse. Wc know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bled exceeded I0,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with thc Barton Collicr plan. a resolution to clnse 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial sectiun, R)rming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing tbese two avenues tben ~e next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by buge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Namctsl (Pie}se Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Nap[cs. Florida 34II2 [)ca~ Com~iss~oncrs. ~, ~ .-~:--¢'~' ff{-~are most,-,mccrn~dabom[be plans [o fi~e'up [07d~ Avenue North with [h~ lart¢ new shoppM~ cea[ct on [mmokalee Road and US41. This wi]lcause 107[h[o b¢com~amajorcuHhrough rou[einto[l~¢cemcr. Thc d¢sircd soud/ern boundary ro]d in the project [~nkin~ up with ]07th will make mat[ers worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbi][ Beach Road extcnsk)n was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shoppin~ center at ?in~ to happen to 107th, and also !0Sth as Wc do not ~aat an access road with a light linkin~ up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled ~ntcrsection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with thc Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th a[ the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would bc thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, If you do not approve closing these two avenues then lhe next best solutinn is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shoppin~ center frmn US 41. Naples Park deserves better iban bcin~ destroyed by hu~e developments across the hi~h,,~a:., .. ~ - .. . Yours truly. ~ Name[s) , (Please PrinO A~drc~ . , , T~lephone number Board o( C,)un[y Conlmissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East ,Naples. Florida 34112 [)ear CUI~IIlliSsIoncFS. m Iinc up 107th Avenue North ~ith d~e large ne~v shoppin~ center on Immo~aIee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th ~o become a major cu~*through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in ~he project li~:in~ up with 107th will mare mat~ers worse. We ~now from ~he Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbik Beach Road extension was built tha~ ~ traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded ~0,0~ vehicIes per day. They did not have a major shopping cen~er at the other end. So imagine what is ,,oin,, to happen to tOT[h, and also 108th as it links up m 107~h at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park a signaled intersection at IOJth Avenue is forced upon us. then we as~ that you include. Xong with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 1071h ;md 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution ~o what wilI be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then ~he next best soIution is to have left turn directionM lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Par~ deserves bet[eF than bein~ destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Signa~ Namers) (Please Prim) Address Telephone number Date: .,. .. Board of County Commissioners 330f Tantianli Trail I:*asl Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We / ' ::, ' ' arc most c~ncerned about the plans to linc up 107th Avenue North ~ith tl~e large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 4t. This will cause I07th to become a major cut-through route into ~e center· matters worse Wc know from ~e Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that tt~ traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also i08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park· If a signaled intersection at I07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you inclode, along with thc Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then lhe next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. / Sig'fi.~Iure Name(s) (Pleas~ Prin0 Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ~ f'(-~ /--.~1 ,x., c/j are most concerned about the plans to line up 107~h Avenue North wl~h thc large new shopping c~nter on I~okale¢ Road and US 41. This will cause 107d~ to become a major cut-through route iron the center. Ti~¢ desired ~omhcrn boundary road in th¢ project li~lng up with 107~h will make mat~ers worse. W¢ know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbik Beach Road cxmnsion was built ~hat ~h¢ traffic on Hickory Bird day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine xvhat is going to happen to I07th. and also i08th as it links up to I07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at I07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at ~e end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution tn what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have ]eft mrn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 4i. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highx~ay, Additional comments: ~*P~ 5 ~u/a Signature" Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number 12B2 Board of County Cmmnissioners 3301 Tamiami Traii East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. [/We / c.',4,~ (.m g"~),'., c, f /--/-,<q ,7, :ire most concerned about the plans to lin~'up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause i07thto become a major cut-throuo_hroute into theccnter. The desired southern boundary read in the project linking up w~th 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded i0,000 vehicIes per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is gc ~ng to happen Po 107th, and also 108th as it links up ro I07th at 8th Court E. Yv'e do not ;~ant an access road with a light lioking up a) any avenue in Naples Park. If : signaled intersection at I07th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. tlong with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, lbrming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be tim cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by hu~e developments across the bighwa>. Additional comments: Yours truly //,/ ~--7-/,<?; '" ' Signature '-' Name(s) (Please Prim) -3-?.i~__1&·.¢ 'zr' /¢~77.~,: ~,. /~c 'A&fress ' Telephone number 12B2 Date: / ' ' ./?"_: / Board of Coun[y Cmnmissioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail Easl Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. , ~ ~ arc most ~.mccrncd about thc plans to linc up 107[h Avenue North with thc large new shopping center on [mmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become :t major cur-through route into the center. The ............. ~l~'qir'd ~,~ ,m,.rq b~tlB~t;lrV .... ro~tl iq thc pr,~?-r lb4' ~" ,? wi0~ ]O7~h will make maucrs worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built rha[ thc traffic on Hickory Bivd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did nor have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen ~o 107th. and also 108d~ as it links up ro t07~ at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled imcrsccfioa at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resoiution to close 10~th a;,d t08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would he the cheapest and simplest solution to what wilt be a major problem If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by hu~¢ developments across the highway. Additional comments: Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Date: /7o -2~ ' , ~. Board of Coullty C(mtnlissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail L:asl Naples, [:lorida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We '~9.~ ~ [ ~v C ~,% ~ 0~(~ are most c ~ccrned about thc plans to line up I07th Avenue North with the lar}e new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a mjor cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the projem linki::g up wid~ 107th will make mnttcrs worse. We know fr~m~ the Pine Ridge experience hd'ore the Vanderbilt Beach Road extcnsioo was buill that thc traffic on tlicko~ Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did nor havc a ma~or sbopping center at the other end. So imagine what is moin~ to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th :~t 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue iu Naples Park. It' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask dmt you include. along wid~ thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution ~ close I07th :md I08th at thc end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a majnr problem. If you do not approve closing these txto avenues thou thc next best solntion is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center fi'om US4I. Naplcs Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Name(s~ (Please Print) Address Telephone number // Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Easl Naples. FI.rida 3-1li2 Dear Commissioners. to linc~qtl~ Avenue Norfl~ with thc large new shopping ccnler on lmmokalcc Road and US 41. This will cause 107th lo become a major cut4hrougb route into the center. TI~e desired x~,udlern h,,undary road in the project lin~dng up wid~ 107th will m'ake mailers worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before ll~e Vanderbilt Beach Rnad extension was built /hat the traffic on Hickory Btvd exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the otl~cr end. So imagine what is going to happen t~ I()7flL and also I08th as it links up tn l()Tth at 8th Court E. XVe do n~t want an access road ~vflh a light linking up t~) any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. d~en we ask that you include, along with the 13arron Collier phm. a resolution lo close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next besl solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center fromUS41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Y o t~ 1 ~ Namel$) (Pleas~ Print~ / Address Telephone number Board ~)1' C,,unty Conlillissioilcrs 3301 Tamiami Trail Easl Naples. Florida 34i12 Dear [/~Vc .~/,A C~OLU~ ~ / arc l~lost conccrocd about the phms to linc op 107d~ Avenue North with the large new shopping ccmcr m~ hnmokalcc Road and 1TS 41 This willcausc i07th m bccmnc a major cut4hrough route into thc center, Thc dcsu'cd $~uthcro bouodary road io die project ]hlkillg up with l(}Tth will make maucrs worse. Wcknmv from the Pine Ridgeexpcricnccbcforethc Vandcrbih Beach Ruad extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Bh'd exceeded 10.0~ vehicles per day They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagin¢ what is $oin~ ~o h;ippcn k) 107th. and also 108th as it lites up m 107th at 8th Court E. We do not ~an( an access road wi[h a li~hl linkin~ up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a siEnalcd imcrscction at 107th Avenue is forced upoo us. then we ask thal you include. along wid~ [Jlc Barton Collier phm. a resolution [o ch)sc 107th and 10Sill at the end of tl~c commercial section, formingahorsesh~around 8thCourtk This wouldbethc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best soludon is to have left turn directional hmesonlyintothcshoppmgccmer from US41. Naples Park descrvcs better than being destroyed by huge dcvch>pmcnts across thc highway. Additional conlHlcn[s: 'fours truly. $i~nJu[4 - -- r Name(s) [Please PrmO Tdcphon~ number Ih)ard of County ConlnliSSion(:rs 3301 'r;uniami 'l'ndl Easl Naples. Fh~rid;~ 3,lli2 "" [~c'(~ f ' / ~ ~ ~st c:mccrncd about thc plans l/We m line up 107th Avenue North with the large ~cw shopping ccn,:'r on hnmokalcc Road and irs 4I. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route inta [Itc center. Thc desired >~)u~hcrn hound~cy mad iu thc project linking up with 107th will make realtors worse Wc know From thc Pine Ridge experience tmforc thc Vandcrbilt Beach I(~*ad cxtcnxi~m ~:~s [mill that thc traffic on ltickory Btvd cxcccdcd 10.000 vchicks per day. Thc5 did n**t have n major shopping center at thc olhcr end. So imagine what is guing t~> h:H*pcn to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. Wc do not w:mt :m access road with a light linking up to an7 avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barron Collier plan, a rcsolution to ch)sc 107th and 108th at thc end of th~ commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8tl~ Coua E. This would bc tl~c cheapest ;md simplest solution to what will bca major problem. If you do aot approve ch)sing these two avc~lucs then IIIc IlCXl best solution is lo have left turn dircctional hmcs only ht{o tl~c shopping center ['rom US4i Naples Park deserves better than being destro)cd hy huge dcvclopmcms across thc highway. 1 2B 2 I~o~rd of C'~unly Commissioocr~ 3301 Tamiami Trail F, ast Naples. Florida 3,;112 I/We''/:t'~'.1 ;, c~l'I/ ~I; ~t~ arc most c'mccrncd about thc plans tO Iirlc Up 107th Avenue Norfll wid~ the large new sh~)pping comer on hnmokalcc Road and US 41, This will cause 107d~ to become a major cm-d~rough route imo tl~c center. The der, ired sou;horn boundary road in the project linking up v,'i:h 107~h will ma',:e mat~crs w~)rse, We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road cxte~si(m was built that thc traffic on Hickory I3lvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day, They did not have a m~d(,r shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is goin~ h) happen t~) 1OTih. and also 10gth ns it links up u) 107th at 8th Court E. We do nm warn an access road with a liEhc linking up h) any avcrmc in Naples Park, if a signaled m(crsccdon at I07th Avenue is forced upnn us. dw.n we ask d~at you include. ahmg with d~e Barton Collier phm. a resolution [o close 107th and 103th at thc end of the commercialsccdon, forming a horscsh~around alllCouri E, This would bc thc chcapcstand simplcstsoludonmwhatwillbeamajor problem, Ifyoud~)notapprovc ch)sing dlcsc two avenues then the next bcs[ solution is lo have Jeff turn directional hmcs only inm thc shopping center from US41, Naples Parkdcscrvcs hcucr than bcin~ dc'str~)?'cd hy huge dcvclopmcms across d~c hiFhway *fours trLilv. Signalurc ; /'.,,.fi'// ,,/ Nam'.ffs) (PIcas¢ Print) ' / t, ,:" I ¢ c Telephone nu iTibe r Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Fh)rida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We arc mos: concerned about thc plans to linc up [07th Avenue Nortb with thc large new shopping center on Immokalce Road and US41. Tbis will cause 107thtobccomeama~orcut-thmu~h route intotbcccmcr. The desired southern boundary road in thc project linking up with I07tb will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was [milt that thc traffic on llickory Bird exceeded 10,C~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other cad. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th ~ it links up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road wi~ a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~b and 10nth at thc end of thc commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what wil[ be a maj{~r problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center ~rom US 41. ,Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Namers) (Please Print) Address _. / T.,:iephon¢ number Board of County Commissioners 330!. Tamiami Trail East Naples. Fh)rida 34112 Dear Commissioners, ' "" ,.~'c ~ , ~ ~ / ~ ~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on I~okalce Road and US 4I. This will cause 107th to beco~ a maior cut-through route into ~e center. Thc desired somhcrn boundary road in thc project linking up with 107th will make matters w~rsc. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hicko~ Bird exceeded 10,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the ortner end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th ~ it links up to 107th at 8th Coum E. We do not want an access road wi~ a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask ~at you include, along with thc Barron Collier plan. a resolution [o close 107:h and 108th at the end of thccommcrcial section, forming a horseshoe around 8thCourtE. This wouldbethe cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. [f you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shoppingcen~er fromUS41. Naples Parkdcservcsbctter than being destroyed by huge developments across ~c highway. Additional co~cnts: ~,q f&'[¢: ~ {.4'[~,~ ~.~ Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Ftorida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to line up 107th A~:enue North Witt~ the/ffarge new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ',',as built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0,000 vehicles per da,,'. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to tJappen to I07th, and also 108th as it links up to I07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road wi~ a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, alomz with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the c~ommercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closin~ these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes ~nl.,,' into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better thao being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Name(s} (Please Print} A(dress Telephone number 12B2 Board of County C~mmissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ,.. ,, . , .- - :, .. .~ .:. ~., ,' are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with thc large ne;',' shopping ccatcr on Immokalce Road and US 4!. This will cause 10'7th to become a maior cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project tip, king up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before tilt: Vanderbilt Beach Road extcnsion was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is go'lng to [;appcn to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a si,.z, naled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. alor~o~ with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107tn and I08th at the end of the c~ommercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closin~ these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes ~nty into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge devetopments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Namers) (Please Print) Address Telephone number 1 2B2 ta Date: ,.' ~-" . Board of Cnunty Commissioners 3301 Tamianti Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We :~ .' ,' ,. ~ , ~, , are most ct'nceI'ned about the plans t,) line up 107th~Avcnue North with the la~e new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th 'to become a major cut-through route into the center. The dnsired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters ,aorse. XVe know from tl~c Pine ~ge experience before thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc tratlic o~ Hickory Bird exceeded I0.000 vehicles per da? Thc> did not have a major shopping cenmr at thc oth:r cnd. Soimagine whatis going to happen to lOTth, and also 108th as it links up tn 107th at 8th Court g. We do no~ want an access road with a lig~ linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan. a resoIution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, fomm~o a horses~e around 8th Court E. This would be cbeapest and simplest solution to what ,,~'~ be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next b~t solution m to have left mrn directional ianes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments aaoss ~e highwa?. Additional comments: Yours truly Signature ', Nam=(s) Please Print) ? :. , ,',.,/ ,, Sot-. z-/ Telephone number - 1282 Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami ]'rail East Naples. Florida 34I !2 ',, C..4"~; ':;/'_. arc most c' tcerncd about the plans to line up 107th .,\venue North with the large new shopping center on Imm,~kalee Road and US ,11 This ;viii cause 107[h to become a major cuHhrough route into the center. The desired s,~uthcrn boundary road in thc projtx:t linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vaodcrbilt Beach Road extenqion ,aris built that thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per da',' Thc? did um havea major shopping centcr at thc othcr end St) imagine ~that is going to hapFcu t~ ll)?dl, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8Ih Court E. We do not ',;ant an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled intersection at t07th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along wiflt thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of tile commercial secuon, forming a horseshoe around gth Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these t'.xo avenues then tile next be~,t sohmon is rd have leR turn directional ianes onl? into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed hy huge dcveloprncnrs across the higtnv, ay Additional commems: Yours truly. Sig~'~tu re ' n Namers) (Please Prim> , Address ',\ 500 Block 107th Avenue N (south side) ~ ~:~ .......... ~ Du lex 50' Im rental MC Hall Estate Richard C Poklcmha c,'- AIWI) WlS'ol 33 i;,i 34 and ~,,M 530 & 5,4{* I rqqcx rc, Htal K35 ,,t ?, '-' t~win H Koert I,, ~5 and 5~ Xl:.,, I I..t 37 & 3X ~.' Jm~ I,,t 59 5?, He.ri & Judith K~gle} '! Ir> [;t 5;ll;~ ('u;~t}:;I N ' ],x 411 [hO .%l~,rrls ('h;trhd} I..,~ 41 ($(,~ (~phclia (' I.,,* 43 & <7' I)-mcnic-& M~gcla Gadalcta Engla~.. UK' SK 122LY i.,,t w35',1(, ss, Robe~ ~A ~1 t, vacalioll hOlllO I,q 47& ~1 ,,sc'ph NI & Msrna Nhdinkcx W35' 12B2. 'q 500 Block 107th Avenue N ( norlh side) [,m 23 & 24 10720 N.B. 'i'llompsm~ ct ux b6ardcd up vacation home I.oi22 511 ~~~ ..Eaeant lott I.m 2I '~ I)omcuic & Michcllc 1..~ 2O QSl~ Ralph I, Wilhclmx h' ]..I 19 ~5~) .[.hn & B./cna Szarck lm IS /527) 5,,fMr;, Beck ~,,,~ 17 531 Namy A, JehafiYar 1329 Plnehurs~ Dr., Defiance. Oil 43.512 I.,,I 16 5Z5 h~c/ V,mgh[ house closed up l,m 14 .._~ (7onstancc & Ilamld Wii~-n Naple~,,l l, 34 ~.,,t ~ 2 55 ~ loseph & AnnM~w"Ha~; I/~t 10 (5 5 9,,' h~scph l,,,t U ~(,~, Nick & Colleen Nero 12930 i,ynn Dr;. e~$ii&l~, OII 44~S' J,i~l 8 Q(~T: Karcn I,-I 7 O~L .John & Mary l'cpc I.-I (~ {575) Thclm;i Iml 4&5 ~5~ M.hammcd & Fahmida Ilahma, Duplex rcmal I,.I 3 ~ llarvcy & .h,;m Restock J.l~l 2 ?Il Gary l,ol I ?)5 Cheryl M. Sabalic 12B2 600 Iflock 107Ih Ave..e N (.orlh side) 20 My~l~ Rd, Naples, 7~4 Cla~Cu,~A~l~ MI 49220 ~rmJny 770- I ~h ~ r? N Nn~j~ ~102 600 Block 11)Tlh Avclltl£, N (south side) I,,: ."/ ~,t i Bm~ 8olda~ ~mcd up vacation h()mc 45~'Hou~on'~ia;;.~ll~n, OH .~ .', ,'.' ;.,, ,, .-. David W, 2693 Nelson tlarry & Barbara Ochlc~ ltW, O '1 wichcnham Rtl,, 'Pasadena. Maryland 21122 231 l.agoon Ay.. Naples, 34 l 33Bay4Olh~L, Brooklyn, NY 11214 ~igi Dimondo yack,, 20 Robwill Cr,~ Bramp~0n, ON Canada ~V 3tt3 5270 N. Kendall ~,} Miami. 3315t, s~ ~low, r,~W~r, ~ vacant ot 1~1 ~ommemla( 8t.?'~ ~3; Glen 700 Block 1071h ,,\vemlc N (nm'Ih si(lc) 1, q ~ I 'I" Iohn R ~ Lynn A, ~ck 9(}15 Mohaw~ St., ~s ~cgas, NV 8Yl39 ,,~ 2~ ".'I Jose & Orcsm O, Nuncz and Fclipa O. Crcspo TR 9202 - 6th Street N., Naples FL 3410~ ,~ I" " R~fl~c~C & MclJssa A. 20 C:~rih, m Ct.. Monterey. CA 939,1() "~ ; ' ''~ Nicola & Giulia ????????T' ' Vacam lot 33 Bay 46th St,. Bmoklyh, NY 1 ~ ,~ [" -: · Ori~ C. Ellis under 830 Wiggins l'as~ Rd W..ApI IB. Naples. 3411~ I ,,: I~* '~-' l lcnry W. & Rosanne R. Schocn Vacant lot 492 Fawns Walk, Annapolis. M D 21401 I ,: ,~, I- :' Joseph R. DcAngelo 26564 ItJckory lllvd, Bmma Springs. FI. 3,113,1 I ,,t t,, 1.? "<' Iglesia Penlecostes PcllicJ [ftc ('hllr~ h 6141 - 24d~ Ay SW., Naples. 34116 I , ,: "& - ' ': [)omcllico & Angela Gadaleta /al~,~ ,,wnq 5~ ' Vacant 572 - 107th Ay N, Naples, Fl. 3410n t.,,~ ~ ,' ~Xl George A. & Eli~beth L. Mnr~hall Ill '~ / 140 Fitchburg, MA fll420 700 Block 107th Avenue N (SoLith side) K,:iH~ Joseph Bus~c 1.~,I 2X 7u(, [Ixmms ~k. & [{dn;I l~. Wcsl t,~t in rlX John I. B~Mcr & Jori L. B~er 57~ Cypress HOIIw Way~lci, FL 341~ I,,: Xl 22 Riced A. & ~ M. TcI~ 161 Wlmerg?ee~ Bre~lhr. MA 02631 s53 E. Valley Dr,,'~M~ Sp~gs 34134 t8 Circle Ay., Sterling, MA: 015~ ix, ;m~ 7~ G~rge L. Atk~ 6~ - 12 Ave NE, Naples, FL ~120 a,,m .:~ 7~.2 Ro~ Beglcy B~r 506 Main SL. Manchester. ~Y 40962 St., ~ude[daSe ~e$, FL 333~ 12 33rd 27720 Tm~y ~:; ~ta S~h~, FL 33923 ~,,~ 4a ~7~25 Jeffc~ L. & Sa~L jtoll~d >~ Pom~dc Dr.i ~apl~: ~ 10~ 800 Block 107th Avenue N (north side) l.ot 32 ,~ Vancssa Olivcrio [.itt 31 ~{)x~)S_q_ Johll Slniucl~ Sr alld John Valldcuscn Il j8 ~n Cove'Av.,~len,Head, NY~ 11~45 Lot 64 817 C~r ~ ~ ~f01yn:.~t![ vacant lot.~ L~t 63 821 Karcn A. Gill%' I1 m ~0~[s~~k;34 60 & I.ot 58 & 841 Ruth ..X. Gerber and Robert C McMurphy E:'5 I.o[ 59 l.(,t 57 tS4N Ehncr l) Park I ~t 56 853 ' ' ' PO ~x 4!4!,~g; FL 3373 1_oI 54 ~ Patllcia W l.incoh~ tl l.~t qX , -~ MariaJ Martmcz If >_ [.ucyllc Bidchnan Lot 51 873 l_ucSIIc Bidlcman 8th Court E vi~nt.lot 800 Block 107th Avenue N (south side) ~ 2B 2 ~t~ ~Gr~lii;,~9'" _ .... 10690 - 8th Street N Lot 29 Leon & Kathleen Sarnowski 7t3 - 97th Ave N.. Naples, FL 34108 l.ot 28 ~¢) Fl~ra Iva [:[inner RECEIVED v o q 1908 ' 3 November 1998 ..~'~f~''- Board of County Conxmssioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 [)ear County Commissioners. A~tached is a cop.',' of thc letter to~eth'_'r v. ith the pctnion letter dx~[ v,e have ,Jsuibutcd to all of residences on I07th and 1OSdt Avenue N While re-visiting homes ;dong these axenucs to collect their already received responses from 5ou We have not completed rc-v~sJring all the homes so know what the total response will be. Those who have responded have been nverwhelmingly in hvor of dosing off l07th and 108th~ntoahnrseshoc. ~cighborsonmhcr axcnues not affected by the development ro the east were quite happy to support our effort on learning a~ou[ tl~e problem. As you have been made awar~ on many occasions during the Naples Park drainage discussions it is extremely difficnlt to ge{ rcspnnses to a pcmirm in Naples Park because of the high percentage rentais'~i[habsentee [andiords Evcnldidn't realize huw man5 o[ thc pr0pcrtics mour neighborhuod Od~crs are owned by "sno~birds", many of whom arc not yet back Wcarctr}in~to re-v~sheach propertyatlcastthrc~tinms bcforc giving up on locatin~ thc owncrs Somc arc owned by Europeans, exper:.encc When speaking to tenants of thc rental properties I have asked dlcnl 1o mail the petition letters on to their landlords }tox[cxcr, m~n5 d(~ n~t cvun kno~ who o~xn~ thc propcrt5 as they deal rea~ estate company And armmbcr u*' d~cm cannot speak concerned about thc valueottllcir propcrt:cs Most knew aboutLh~ Pine Rid:':ltickoryBlvdproblem and were very upset to find their avenue woukt be exposed to the same amour:t of vehicles, or more. The traffic counts on 108tl~ are currendy tl~e highest of any avenue in Naples Park, and most property owners were very pleased to be presented with a solution to their cut-;brough :raffic. Imagine what would happen to winding, narrow I07th if it becomes an open access to thc main entrance f a major shopping center, office buildings, post office, and commerce park~ When the Granada development cmnes up for discussion on Tucsda), [0 Novcm[,er I will presem the petition letters together with a sumnlary of thc properties along these avenues In thc mcarllin)c [ hope that ?u will hate au opporrun~t5 to chuck thc attached petition letters, ayxd read their Yours truly, '~/ ~-~v Mere Fitz-Gerald, Pr~r .... Property Owners of Naples Park PO Box 420012 Naples, FL 34110 Telephone: 597-5648 Emaih verafg~naples.net The Barron Collicr Company is planning to build a major sboppin~ centc: and oft~ces across from Naples Park bigger than [he Cari/l,)r] sbopFing center on Airper[ Ibxid and Pine Ridge Road. plus two off'icc to~ cr's intersectiun Tiffs nlea115 ;tn}'on: From thc west nr norlh Of LIS and ;II¥OIIC l'ronl Xaples Park Cilll (and mos~ certaini>', kkiib zip along 107th or I08th lo get to the shopping comer, p,~st office, otlicc buildings, or fl~e Crccksidc Commerce Park In addition fl~c C,)un[v 'aants a zend 10uilt into thc projcc~ providing an east/x~cst ncccss bct~ccn Goodlcttc Rd and ['S 4i This WOLlld connect to i07th. We know from fi~e Pine Ridge cxpez'icncc ti~at thc cu[-thn:ugh tHiHSC x~iil Itc hnrrcndou5 with 107th bearing the brunt Residents ii~ing along the narro',~, winding scciion in thc 800 block should traffic cuunt oF n',cr ]O.000 ~chic[cs per day'. And it st:is not Imcd u[~ ,ahh a major shopping center' to 107th and IUSth A',cnucs ~l' ~c d,) n,x. ulkc action nn,,v. I am ad:u]]an[l? o[)?scd to allowing our avenues :o become major o>[lcctors, or ar;trials for thc con,.'cniuncc of edicts The cu:-ihrough ~rat'tSc is already quite higi~ on 108:h. I:~tillunl) increase when a major shopping center is easily accessed via i08th Thc simplest solution m thc problems of bmh iOgd~ alld 10Sth ~s lo ClOSe Ibc roads at Ibc end oI thc commercial area ending Ihcsc [v,o avon'.es into a horseshoe around 8th Ct East. [See oxcr~ As soon as US 41 is sixdaned ibc acccs< t,~ 109th ',*iii be cut o/Tas is {10th a!readv..Most of us a!rcady use I ] Ifil A'.enuc to come and ? as ][ is easier [ban crossin~ [t]c highway. Soclo:,ing lOg[band 108dlwiilnotcauseanydis~upnox,~rincon,,cnienccto:bcrcsiden[s Besides having our quit: ,.~av of life ahcrcd by ibc conslan[ stream and roar el ail ibis (raf[ic it will also devalue our berets. Who wOU~d t~all[ to buy a house on a nlalor road with over lO,000 ~cbiclcs tearing up and down thc road all day. and ever) d;l?'~ NO OqC This problem will bc addressed on Xo~cmbcr loth ~qicn Barren (ullicr Company present their plan to thc Board of Count)' Commissioners We need to bc IIlcre and ~c need to pull together ;o protect nut homes. This will be our one chance to make the Commissioners listen to our concerns. Fix)sc who can attend the Cnmmissioners meeting on Nov loft] should do so even il' thc? do not wish to speak Seeing a crowd of cnnccrned Faces is what is importam. EVERYOXE shok:ld read and fill om the attached form. You don'[ even need ~o mail it, just call mc and i ,alii pick il up at your house Yours ~mlv5 Vera Fitz-Ger~'d~resident Property Owners oF Naples Park Telephone: 597-5648 Email: verafgOnaples.net 12B2~ ,. $ho¢ slore 2B2111 Date: Board of Count.',' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 341 I2 Dear Colnmissioncrs. I/We arc most concerned about the plans to line up 10?th Avenue Nord`` with the large net,, shopping center on Immokalce Road and US 41. This will cause !07th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extenskm ,.,.'as built that the traffic on ltickory BNd exceeded 10,000 vehicles pct' day. They did not have a major shopping cemer at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107[h at 8ill Court E. We do not want ar', access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intcrscc:ion at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and t08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. rbis would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, lC you do not approve closing these fao avenues then the next best solution is to have lull turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge de'.elopmenrs across the highv, a? Additional commcnls: "(ours truly, Signature Namees) (Please Prinu Address Telephone number Datc: . ~ / P, qard of County CocItIlllSSioIler'~; 5501 Tamiami l'~ail Naples. Fb~rida 34!12 Dear Commissi,mcrs. I;We _~;_~, ~ 5, __~z'.; .c'' 5) ,' -'~ arc mnst cc ncerncd about tl~c plaus t,~ linc (:[~ !OTtb A~cnue N,mh ~ith ibc large new sbopptng ccn..r ou Immokalcu Road and US 41 This ',vili cause 107tb lo i{CC,)lllC a ll/aior cut-dlrouljh rome into thc ccmcl' Thc ,'Jcsircd s,;ud~crn tmunda~' road in the protect liukinz uv ~i;h lOTlb will make ;nat~crs ~crsc Wc know from Ibc Pine Ridge experience before thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road cxtcnsi,m ~as built fl~a~ thc traffic ou Hickory Bird exceeded I0.000 vehicles per da? -['hcy did not ba~c a major sbopping center at thc other end. So imagine ',~hat going it) ixtppcn ~,> lOTth, and al:lo 1081h as i~ links up ~o 107~h a~ 8~h Court E. %'c do ilo~ wahl an access road with aligN linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imc~sccfion at 107th Avenue is Iorccd upon us. then ~c ask that you include. along with ~hc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close !07a~ and 108~h at ll~e end of thc commercialsec~ion, formingahor=esNmaroundSthCourtE. This wouldbc cheapest andsimplcs~sotudontowhatwillbcamajorprob!em. If you do not approve closing It~cs¢ two avenues then the nex~ best solution is to bare ]ef~ mrn directiooal !ants only into the shopping center from US 41. Napics Park deserves bcuer than being destro?ed by buge dcvelopmcms across the highway. Additional commcots; Yours truly, Signature Name/s (Please Prinl) ,' ' Address Telephone ~umbcr Date: ~3oarc of Coun[) Cammissioners 3301 Tanliami Traii Naples. Fh)nda ~'" Dear Cnmmissioncrs. [,We ~_3~.5A ,,'~, arc m o<t conczrncd about the plans t,o linc up 107th Avenue North with the ,a,=~ new shopping ten:er on hnmokalcc Road and US4! This ~il!cause 107thtobe::ome amajorcu:dxrough rou~c into d~cccntcr. n;ai~crs ',tOrSO V/c know from [lie Pine t. dgc ex ... c...: ~c,or. the Vandcrbih Beach Road exlcnsion was built ~har d~c traffic on Hickor': Bl',d c.,.::edcd 10.000 vehicles per da} Thc':' did no; have a major shopping cemer a~ ~bc c, ff~:r end So imagine whu~ is ,2~.. m_,: to h;~ppcn to 107d]. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E We do noi want ar; access road wirh a light linking tip u) an? avenue in Naples Park. It' a signaled intcrseztion at I07th Avenue is lbrccd upon us. then ,a'c ask that you include. along '4ith tl'~c Barton Coilicr plan. a resolution to ch>sc 10';tN and 108th a~ t!~c end of d~ccommercialsec:ion, formingahoro_ho.¢,.- ~arounda~h" C'5ur. E. This wouldbcthe chcapcsl and simplest soluiion ta ',~h;u wiil be a mai,ar problem, h' ?u do ne~ appra~u closing [hose =wo avenues [hcn [he nc~[ bcs[ solu[ion is lo have lel'l [urn directional lanes only into[he shopping center Irom US41. N.~p,u.,Parkdcscrves be[ter than being destroyed by hug= dc'.elopmcms across Addifionai cemmcms: Yours truly. Signal=r: (',,- ,-~c~ '~ Name(s/ (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board o~' Coumy Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 3-1-112 Dear Commissioners. :WeZ oO cc, are ,ostcor,':rnedabo, tthep ans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired somhern bt)undary road in the project linking up xvi[t~ 10Vrh will make matters worse. XVe know from the Pine Ridge experience beibre the Vanderbilt Beach Road ex:ension x~as built tbat the ~raffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per dax The} did r~ozha',ea majorsboppingccnter at ~hc other end So imagine wbat going :o happen to I07th. and also i08th as it link~ up ~o 107th a~ 8ih Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up ro any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at I07th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along ~ui~h thc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to dose 107th and t08th a~ the end of ~he commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8t~h Court E. This would be ckeapes~ and simp[¢s~ solunon to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these ~wo avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only imothe shoppingcsn~cr from USa1 Naples Park deserves better dina being destr%cd by huge dc.'elopmer~ts across the Additio~ul commen~: Yours truly. Signalt,~.d Narae/s) (Please Printl Address Telephone number 12B2 Board of County ComI:'lissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 341[2 Dear Commissioners, ./We /-/,,'.//) .... ~,~/'5.'-f_-~_,;£,~55,.___' ,~/-,"~ :ire most cmwcrncd about the plans to line up 7~!~ ..\,,e~ Nont~ v, ith tl:'e laro~e ne'>., si~oppmg center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cutqhrou.L.'b route into the center l'he desired southern boundary road m the project linking up with 10?th will make matters ;vorse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ,.vas built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. The.'.' did not have a major shopping center at die other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 10$th as it links up It:, 107th at Sth Court E. Y',,'e do not ,.'.,ant an access roacJ with a light linking up to am.' a,.enue in Naples Park. It' a signaled intersection at 10Tth Avenue is forced upon us. then ,.ye ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to ch)sc ll37d} ami I08th at the end the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court i£. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what ',,.'ill be a major problem. It' you do not appro',e closing these two avenues then thc next best solution ~s a; have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from LIS 41. Naples Park deserves better than being deslroyed by huge de',dopmems acrnss d~e high'.,.a:. Additional commems: SignaSfre y ~Y Name(s) (Please Print) Address Tdephon~ number 1 2B 2"1 Date: /O- 2 Z-5'~'/ Board of C'~)ums C, ilssimers 3301 Tamianli Trail East N'aplcs. Fl,)rida 3-il 12 Dear Commissioners. I/We , ~c.' .' e,~ ~ ~ ~/o ,' arc most ce-:zcrned about the plans ~o line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on lmmokalec Road and US 4l. This will cause 107tb to become a mnjor cutqbrough route into thc Thedcsircdsoutbcrnhoundar~ road in'"u[e[ortajecthn~m~' "'upwitb lOTih~illl matters worse Weknosv ftomd~e Pine RidgeexN~icncchcforctbc Vande:bihBcacb Road extension ~*as huiIt that the trat'/Sc on HickoD.Bivdexcecdcd 0.O00~ehicle~ per day. 'Fbev did not havo a major shopping center al d}c od~cr end S ~ imagine wix. is zoinz to happen to 107lh. and also 108th as it lin~ up to 107th at 8ab Courl E. We do not ttant au access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Napics Park. a signaled intersection at I07[h Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you includ,:. ah)rig with thc Barron Collicr plan. a resolution to close 107th a'.J I08th at thc end of d~e commercial section, forming a horseshoe arou~ 8d~ Court E. Tbis would be cheapest and simplest solution [o wha~ will be a ~mjor probDm. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then {he next best sob]don is to bavc left turn direcdno:d lanes only into [be shopping center from US 41. Nap!cs Park dcscr'.'es beuer than being desm~?ed by huge de'.'chopments across Ibc higbx~a5 Name!s (Please Prim) ,.SZ Telephone number 12B2 1 Date: . .." -- Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiarni Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. l/Wc ' /' ' / '2.: . ~ /~. arc most concerned about thc plans to line up' 107th Avenue North widl the'large new shopping center on Irrunoi:.alee Road and US 4I. This ,,viii cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern boundary road in thc project linking up with I07th will mhke matters worse. We know fromlhcF'inc Ridgeexpcricnccbeforeti~eVanderbiltBeacb Road extension ,.','as huiIt that Ibc traftlc oil Hickory Blvd exceeded I0.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shoppmgcenter at~hco[hcrend S,)imagine what is going t,> happen to 107th, and als<) 108th is it links up [o I07th at ,'~ti~ Court g. We do not want an access road with a lighl linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask ri)at you include. along with the. Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and I08tb at the end of th¢ commercial section, forminga horseshoe around 8tbCourtE. This would be thc cheapest anti sh'nplest solution to ,.,.hat ,.,,'ill be a major prrfl)Iem If you do not approve closing these two avenues dlen tile next [)est solution is [() have left rum directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Nap!c; Park dcse:',es belier than being destroyed by huge developments across tile hiehwa'. Additional commcms: Yours truly, -//'"/..,, _ _~: Signature / Name(s) tPleasePrint) 44: ,,: ?/ Address Tch:phone number :' :,>"- Board of Coumy Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. . _ .~.,.o ,,/~*' -,-, ,,d ~5'~ are most concerned about the plans to line up I07th Avenue North witl~ the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107ih to bezome a major cut-through route into the center. The desired sou{hem bounda~ road m the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. Weknow From the Pine Ridgeexpcricncebeforetbe VanderbiltBeach Road extension was bulk tidal [he traffic on Hickory Bh'd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did no~ have a major shopping center at the other end, So imagine what is going to happen to I07[h. and also 108[1~ as it links up ~o 107~ at 8th Court E. We do not want nn access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along wiHa thc Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and I08th at {he end of the commercial secHon, fom~Jng a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would bc thc cheapest and simplest solution to wha~ will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing tbese two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from USa1. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across tbe highway. Additional comments: Yours [ru y, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number L''o:[-",' Date: Board of Coumy Commissioners 3.30i Tamiami Trail East NapIes. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ¢~/C.L r~ {T' (7~ O','0~ are most co,zerned about the plans to line up I07th Avenue North with the larg: new shopping center on Immckalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Ti~e desired soud~ern boundary road in t~e prqect hnkmg up with 107th will m'ake ma~[ers worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension ~tas built that ~he traffic on Hickory Bh'd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did no~ have a major shopping cemer at the other end. So imagine what is going ~o happen ~o 107~h. and also 108th ~ it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road wi~h a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imersecdon at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close i07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Cour~ E. This would be tl~e cheapest and simplest soludon to wha~ will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues ~hen ~he next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only in~o the shopping center from USg1. Naples Parkdescrvesbe:terthan being destroyed by huge developments across the hi~h,aay. Additional commems: Yours truh' Signature Name(s) (Please Prim) Addres~ / Telephone number 12B2 Date: Board of County Commissioners 330I Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34i 12 Dear Commissioners. I:'Vs'e ~'. ., ':: f/~//'~. ,/~ ,--2 ~' .-' w' 2; are most concerned about the plans Io line up 107th Avenue Non;", with the la:eec new shopping cen~er on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This ',','ili cause I07th to become a major cut-through route into the comer. t'ae desired southern boundary road in the project linkmo_ up with 107th will mhke matters ,','brae. We know t'rom the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was buiIt £hat the traffic on Hickory Bb'd exceeded t0,000 vehicles per da.','. The.',' did not/~ave a rnJjor shopping center at the other end. So ima_~ine what is going to happen to I07th. and also i0$th as it li~s up to I07th at 8th Court g. Vv'e do nol ','.'ant an access road with a light linking up to any a~enue in Naples Park. If a signaled m~ersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with tl~c Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close t07lh and I08th at the end bt' the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these p. vo avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes o~.',' into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by' huge developments across the highv, av Additional commems: Yours tFu]v " ' 2, ' 5i~:nature /,, '- ~' c f ~ c.. ;-c S .._.,..~_ , .<-~-,7 /..'-,,-' .5 /~ ' ..' 7: -- :' 77( r:~ j<-~, c Name,'s} (Please Print) . Address Telephone number -- 12B2 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Eas~ Naples. Florida 34.112 Dear Commissioners, .,~,2 ' .~.;~--~- "' / are most c~ncerned about the plans to line up 107th ;~venug,North ~,ith the large new shoppin~ cen,_r on [mmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07thtobecomeamajorcut_throueh route intc thc center. Thc desired southern boundary road in thc pzojczt li~in~ up 'a'~th lO?th wi!! make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickoo' Blvd exceeded 10.000 vehicles per da)'. They did not have a major shoppin~ center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as k links up to 107th at 8th Court E. \V¢ do nol want an access road with a light linking up Io any avenue in Naples Park. II' a signaled imersecfion at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along ~kh the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 10$th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major probIem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is Io have Icft Iurn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves belter than being destroyed by huge developments across the high~,ay. Additional comments: Yours HqJ iv, / H. Namcis) (~¢as¢ Prim) C~'? /c Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Coramissioners. I/We 0t3 3I~ 'k ~f"O L ~'5 K~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping cent:r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07th to become a major cut-throug:, route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th wiP make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory. Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end~ So imagine what is going to happen to I07th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and i08th at the end of the corrmqercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) Address Telephone numar Board of Courtly Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34[12 Dear Commisshmers. to line up 107d~ Avenue North wid~ the hrge hew s~x>ppin~ center on Immokalee Road and US41. This will cause I07tbtobccomeamajorcut_throu~hroutein~od~e The desired sombern boundary road in the projec~ linking up w~tb 107th will make mauers worse We know from Ibc Pine Rid=e experience before mc Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built dut thc traffic on tlickory [31vd exceeded i0.000 vehicles per day. They did ~ot have a major shopping comer a~ d~c od~cr end So imagine wha~ going [o happc~ [,~ I07[h. and also 108d~ as d links up to I071h at Sd] (2c~u~t g. %ze do Ilo{ watl~ an accgss road wid~ a ligb~ li~ing up m any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled intersection at 107d~ Avenue is forced upon us. I/le~l w5 9sk that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to dose 107d~ nnd 108th a~ 0~e end of the commercial section, formingahorseshoearoundSd~Cour~E. This wouldbc cheapest and simplest solu~ion to wha[ will be a major prob}cm. It'youdono~nppro~c ch)sing tbcsc [,.to avenues then ibc next bcsi solution is t¢~ have lct'~ ltJrn directional hines only into dqc shopping cunter from US 41. Naples Park deserves bcucr being destroyed by huge developments across ibc highway Additional comments: Si~ff;lmre // Name(s) (Please Print) -- Address Telephone n~mber ] 2S2 II Date: /'.- ' 7 '~ Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, "": '" ' ' "'; ':', .....-,--~--- are most concerned about tile plans I/We ,, to line up 107th Avenue' North with thc large new shoppin~ cen:,:r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-ti~rou~h route into the center ............... ,..~ if. .... p,,o~.,,,,..,,,.~:'":~ up ..... ,, ,,,.~ 1 ............'make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was buih that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The'/did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up [o 107th at 8th Court E. We do not warn an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park, If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and I08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be he cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directiona lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway Additional comments: ~-_.~, ,' ~-f'f..._ ' ..-~ -?:..2-.~..-<,-7.7..' Yours Signature 7~/.~,','', f-'n Name(s) (Please Prim) f ;2 / - .v '2 :~; Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, are most concerned about ,he p ans to line up 10?th Avenue North'Xvi& the large new shopping centei on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into abe center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107~h, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 10gib at the end of the cormmercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then lhe next best solution is ~o have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better d~an being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Telephone numar / Board of County Commissioners 330i Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Co~issioners, ' ~p enue Noah with ~t~ large new shoppin~ cemer on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th ~o become a major cut-t~rou~h rou~e imo the center. The desired southern boundary road in the projec~ Hnking up with i07~h will m~ke matters worse. We know from d~ Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbik Beach Road extension was built ~hat ~h~ [raf~c on Hicko~ Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day, They did no~ have a major shopping ccn[er a~ lhe other end. So imagine what is going to happen ~o 107th, and also 108~h as k links up ~o I07~h at 8~h Co~t E. We do not wan~ an access road wi~h a lighlli~ing up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection a~ 107th Avenue i5 forced upon us. ~en we ask lha~ you include, a~ong whh ~he Barron Collier pIan, a resolution to close 107th and I08th a~ ~he end of (he commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8~h Court E, This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to wha~ will ~ a major problem ff you do not approve closing these two avenues ghen the next besl ~lufion is [o have left turn directional lanes only imo ~he shopping cemer from US 41. N ~ aples Park deserves better ~han being deslroyed by hugc developmems acres the highway. Additional commems: /R 2 ~ / Yours ~mly, Name(s) (Please Prin0 ~ ~z'- /~ 7~' ~v Add~css Telephone number 1 2B 2 Date:./<9 ¢ ? Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, "t ' " . ) . .(.J. bvI are most co"':erned about the plans I/We.l~,.m'-=- ,..~,.'.~l lJ:~- /\ ,' to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalcc Road and US 41. This will cause 107lb to become a major cut-through route into the center, The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before tile Vanderbilt I3each Road exlension was built that lhe traffic on Hickory B/vd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They (:lid not have a major shopping center at Ihe olhcr end. So ima-ine ',-','hat is going to happen to 107Ih, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th ar.d i08th at tile end of tile commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is m have left turn directional lanes only into tile shopping center from US 41. Nap/es Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the hi~h,,vay. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature , .. Name(*) (Please Print) Addzes~ Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, "'~ .Al . // I/We/1~ -- '~/1(~, ,~/?///~ ~"~ /.~ ) / ~ ~ -' are ,nost co~ze rned a bout the plans to line ti. lfl0Jfll/Avenue North ;.('ith tile large new shopping cenler on Immokalee Road and US 41, This will cause i07th to become a major cut-through rome into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did nol have a major shopping cenler at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107tll a~ 8th Court E. We do not want nfl access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. Il' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you incluc~e, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at tile end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being deslroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Telephone number Board of Count), Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. FIorida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/~ ~J"~5',z"//"~,,~/'d/,~? Gzg/tfl~z.g'-,2_.., are most concerned about the plans to m~e up 107t'h Avenue North with the large new shopping ::nter on Irnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route imo the center. The desired soumern boundary road in the project linking up wid~ I07th will make ma~ters worse. We know from tile Pine Ridge experience before the ",;anderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blwt exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da.','. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagide what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Cour~ We do not ,,','ant an access road with a ligl'a linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and i08th at file end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Co::r; E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then tile next bes~ solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4i. Naples Park deser;'es better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. A.ddidonal comments: {/ Yours truly, Sig'iY&u r e Name(s) (Piease Prin0 Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East NapIes. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, h ",.'e ~'.fd~//&--Z-/q .0'2. ~w~ ~ are moq concerned about the plans o line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping :enter on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-~rough route into the center. The desired soumern boundary road in the project ii~ing up with I07th will m~ke matters worse. We ~oxv from the Pine ~ge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickoo' Blvd exceeded 10,~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen ~o 107th, and also 108th ~ it li~s up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not wan~ an access road with aligN li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution ~o close 107th and 108fl~ at ~e end of the co~ercial section, fo~ing.a horsesh~ ~ound 8~ Co:at E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what wi] ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing ~hese two avenues then tl~e next be~ solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acres ~e highway. Name(s) (Ple~e Prin~}. Address Telephone number ?. " 12B2 Date: ' Board of Count.',' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, _ ./////~7¢ . , . and US 41. This will cause 107~h ~o BeCome a major cm4~ou~h rou~e in~o ~he cemer. The desired southern bounda~ road in ~he project Ii~in~ up with 107th will make mac,ers worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before ~he Vanderbik Beach Road extension was buil~ tha~ the traffic on HickoD' Blvd exceeded I0,0~ vehicles per day. They d~d nm have a major shoppin~ cenmr a~ ~he oQ~er earl. So imagine wha~ is going ~o happen ~o 107~h, and also 108th as it links up ~o I07¢h a~ 8~h Cou~ E. We do not want an access road with a ligh~ li~in~ up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imersec:ion a~ 107~ Avenue is forced upon us, ~en we ask ~ha~ you include, along wi~h the Barron Collier plan, a resolution ~e commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8~h Cour~ E. This would be ~he cheapes~ and simples~ solutioa Io what will be a major problem. If you do no~ approve closing ~hese two avenues ~en ~he next bes~ solution is ~o have Ich turn directional lanes o~y in~o ~he shopping cemer from US 41. Napies Park deserves better than being deswoyed by hu~e developmems across the highway. Additional co--ems: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/~& .4q Y [~ 7' / ~ ~ ~1 /:/:/ ri/ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center, The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will mike matters worse. We know from ~he Pine Ridee experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on/-~ickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The.',' did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine ',','hat is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a Ii~zht linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersect/on at 107th Avenue i"s forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US ai. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. I'Yl Y /~ F'L c: Name(s) (Please Print) Addres~ Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 330i Tami;lmi Trail Naples. Florida 3,1112 Dear Commissioners, I/We .cloStv ~ ~,~ ~//vc ~ ~/c~4~'c are most co,cerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with ~he large new shopping center on Immokalce Road and US 41. This will ~us~ 107th to become a major cut-tt~ou~h route into the center, The desired southern ~undary road ~n the project l~king up w~th 107th will make maucrs worse, We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built grot the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0,000 vebicles per day. They did not ~ve a major shopping center a~ the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it li~ up ro 107th at 8th Court E, We do not warn an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue i~ forced Upon us. then we ask that you include, along with ~he Barron Collier plan, a resolution the con~crcial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better lhan being destroyed by huge developmems across the Ifighway. Additional commcms: .~oPuk~/aw, you ~ /~ ,o~. /"ZL ~zO~ 17', Yours truly, ,4 7 $ignamr~ Namers) (Please Prim) : 7,'.z' /02''--~ /7~'~:, /t/,epc~r ~ddress Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 330l Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ~.,~/...~q4~ 0-.~.~:lcC, are most concerned about the phlns to line up 107th Avenue Nomh wia~ tim large new shopping centt'e on Immokalee Road and US 41, This will cause 107~h to becom~ a major cut-through rou~e inlo ~he cemer, The desired somherr~ boundary road in Ibc project linking up widl 107~h will m~ke matters worse. We know from lhe Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built dmt the traffic on Hickory Bh'd exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the o~her end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it liars up to 107th at 8d~ Court E. We do not warn an access road with n light linking up a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, dmn we ask that you include, along with the Natron Collier plan, a resolu Ion o close 107th and 108d~ at the end of the Co~ercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court cheapest and simplest solution lo what will be a major problem, tfyou do not approve closing these two avenues then the new best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves bettor than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. AdditionalcommenB: t ~t~_~n i03t~ ~.~. ~a ~ ~.~. Yours ~lv, same(*) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamkmfi Trail East Naples, Florida 3,1112 Dear Commissioners, to llne up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on It~lokalee Road and US 41, This will cause 107th to become a major cut4hrough route into the center, The desired southern boundary road in the project li~ing up with 107th will make matters worse, We know from thc Pioc Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehlcl~s per day, They did not have a major shopping center at the other end, So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also t08th as it I}nks up to 107th at 8d~ Court E, We do not warn an access road with a light linking up lo any avenue in Naples Park, a signaled mtcrsec ion al 107th Avenue is forucd upon us. then we ask that you hlclude, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and i08tb at thc end of the co.~ncrcial section, fonning a horseshoe around 8th Court E, This would be cheapest and simplest solution to what will b~ a major problem, If you do eot approve closing these two avenues 0~en the next besl solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US al, Naples Park deserves better than being des toyed by huge developments across the highway, Additional COlntnents: Yours t~ly, Name{,) (P,ca~e Prim) ./ Address T~ephone number Board of Count.v Commissioners 3301 Tamlami Trail East Napl,:s. Florida 3,1112 Dear Commissioners. ,~- / I/We ... ~ ~ ~ cO.,..) ~.~ ..~/ / ~] U~ ~ 'C.~ ~ are mos~ concerned about the plans ~o linc up lO~th Avenue Nofih wkh tim large n~w shoppin~ ccn~n~ on Immo~lc~ Road and US 41. This will cause 10~h to become a major cut-througl~ route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in ~l~c prujcct linking up wkh 107th will make matters worse, We know From thc Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbll Beach Road cx~cnsion was bulk fl~:n thc mff~c on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping comer at the other end. So imagine what is going ~o happen to 107th. and also 108lb ns i~ links up [o 107th a~ 8th Court E, We do not want an access mad with a light linRing up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. a sig~led intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upoo us. then we ask that you include. along wkh the Barton Collier plnn. a resolution to close 10?~h and 108lb at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe aronnd 8th Court F. This would be thc cbeapcs[ and simplest snlution to what will be a major prnblcm. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solmion is to hay= left n~rn directional lanes only into the shopping center fromUS41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Date: Board of County Comrnissioners 3301 Tantiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. l/¥~'e L..:- ' ' ' x , c,: , ',t::~, ~ ~,,....nr mostconccrncd abou~thc plans to Iinc up 10?th Avenue North wit~ thc large new shopping centc: on Immokalcc Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route inte thc center. The desired southern boundary ruad in the project li~ing up with 107d~ will make mntters worse. Wc know from ~e Pine Ridge expcrie~e before the Vnndcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that fl~e trnffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did no~ have a majnr shopping c=nter at ~he other end. So imagine what is ~oinc to happen to IOTth. nnd also 10Sfi~ as i~ [i~s up ~o I07tb nt S~h Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forged upon us, then we ask that you include. nlong with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~ and 108~h at the end of thc co~ercial section, fomfing a horseshoe around 8~ Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not npprovc closing thcsc two avenues ~hcn thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping cen~cr from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acruss thc hiuhwav. Additional commencs:~ ..'.: ~, ,..~ . ,-. ,_ .( .,_ ~ _, .- ~ JL~] '-- k, ,~ ~o ~ ~)c:-.-, ,.' - ~e'. Yours , Signature N~me(s) (P[en~e~rint) Address Telephone number Board of County Comsnissioners 3301 Tarniami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, / ~ I/W _ '~.'Cb t ' L_.,~ t4.,.~--t./t~'¥' are most ce~:serned about the plans to line up 107th Av'e/nue North with the large new shopping center on Irnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at Sth Court E. We do not warn ao access road with a light Iiaking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th a!~d 108th at the end of the co~runercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, / - /' 9/--d'c-' - Nme(s) (Ple~e Prim) Telephone number i 2B2m Date: II- Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East NapIes, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, , ,' ..- '?'--Ja-->~--e' z.-, are most cotlcerned about the plans to line up 10?th Avenue North with the large new shopping cenuA on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 10?th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a nmjor shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it [ir~ks up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light lin. king up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the contmcrcial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what ,,vill be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional coraments: . /~/~c~... /L.77_~._/~,~ ._~/._~_.,~., /~,.,a...,~._/~._...,/~ Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (?lease ?j'int) ' Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired souihern boundaO' road in the p,oject linking up with 107th will m~ku matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ,,,,'as built that the traffic on Hickory. Bivd ex.c.dcdc o ', i0,000 vehicles per day. The.'.' did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to i07lh, and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we as}: that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th an,l 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would bethe cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ,( . ' /,.' ~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping cent,;,' on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route inte the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project lit&lng up with 107th will mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going [o happen to 107th, and also 108th as it lit,ks up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th aiid 108th at thc end of the corranercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~ solution is to have left turn directional fanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Par}: deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additionalcomments: .Z~ l ~// ~ .c ,ex.: /'/r/'~ ~ t/.~z t/,~ , f'~ ~ll4'~'e Yours truly, Signatjffe / - __ Namc(~) (Please Prim) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ~ NF-r::'3 ~ ,'3'~, ' i cc,,), ½0rc, xkti ~.; are most co.cerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping ccnt~.~ on immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into [he center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagioe what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8£h Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park, If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, fl:eh we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107de and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4l. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly,/ Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number 12B2 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We D, /5 __ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4i. This will cause i07th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th ',','il! make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension `.vas built Ibar the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. The.',' did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine ',.','hat is going to happen to 107th. and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close i07th add 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left rum directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address _ Telephone number Board of County Commiss oncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 4i. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundap/road in the projezt lipping u~ with 107th ma~ters worse. We know from ~he Pine Ridge experience before tt~e Vanderbilt Beach Road exrension was buih that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping comer at the other end. So imaeine what is going [o happen [o I07rh, and also I08th as it li~s up to 107th ar 8th Co~-r E. We do not want an access road wi~h a light Ii.rig up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close i07th a~ I08th at the end of the co~ercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Nap[es Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional conunents: S i gna tm'~,,,,~ Name(s) (Please Prin¢ .g'co ioT Address Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 330I Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/I[lii Z. ~.. are most co..,'erned about the Ions to line up 107th Avenu:~_/North with the~~opping center on Immot:alee ~iad and US 4i. This will cause 107tl~ to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thz a ; ~cu ..... ~ road matters worse. We ~ow from rl~e Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilr Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the o~her end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also I08th as it li~s up to 107~ at 8tl~ Co~t E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at I07th Avenue is forced upon us, then w: ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close i07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing ~ese two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park de~mes better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. c~ditional comments: ~c~46;5~ &,~ [.5./~ ~, ~~ ~. d~,.~/p Yours truly, Signa~re ~,.. ~ ~a'~e(s) (Please Print) __ Address// Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissk)ners, 6'. ~ mos[ coucerned about [he plans to line ~p 107lb Avenue North with ae Iar~e new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause i07d~ to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired samhern boundary road in the project linkina un with 107th will m~ke matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the tra~c on Hickory Bh'd exceeded 10,000 vebkles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 10&b as it Ii~s up to 107th al 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light limking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. d~en we ask that you include. along with fl~e Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th a the end of the CO~ercial section, forming a bo~eshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to wl~t will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have leE: mrn directional lanes only into tile shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcvelopmcna across ~e highway. ~ours truly ~ . f ', ~l~ ~ %~ Na~(s} (Please Pr n ) Td~phone number Board of County Commissioners .330i Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, ~t~'~e most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern bounda~ roqd in the project Ii.inn ua with 107th will m'ake matters worse. We ~ow from &e Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built dmt the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center al thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107d~, and also i0Sth as it li~ up to 107th at 8th CoUrt E. We do nor warn an access road with a light li~ing up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection ar 107th Avenue is forced upon us, t~en we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at Om end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe arouM 8th Cour, L. This would be the chenpest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only' into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developmems across the highway. Additional co~ents: /07< '+ [O,~' {~ ~,~ ~ tq .... / Yours/~ly, Same(s, (Please ~i~ ~ Telephon~um~r I Board ot' County Commissioners 3301 'Tamianfi Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Co~nmissioners. "' , l/We ..]].;;.7.'-..'-L; 'r .... ' '";=':"/ ... are most c.:,ncerned about tim plans to line up 107th Avenue North 'ditb the large new shopping ce :i':.r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4brough route inr9 the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse, We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on I~ickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to [07th. and also i08lh as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not ,.yam an access road with a light linking up to any a;'¢nue m Naples Park. If a signaled intersection al 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask' that you include, along wifl~ the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th :'nd 108th nt the end nf the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court £. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these tv.,'o avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping cenler from US 41. Naples Park deserves beuer ti'mn being deslro.vcd by huge developments across the highway. Additiona! comments: Yours truly. :'? Signa~gl~.. ~ Addres~ . , I.'. ~/7'~. Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 :,, Dear Commissioners, I/~ ~',~/Z*')~&~'/-/ k/..J~& ~_.~ ~/~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping cem,:r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cm4hrough route into the center. The desired southern boundap] road in the pr~ect linking up with 107th will m'ake matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before the VanderbiR Beach Road extension was built ~hat the traffic on tlickory Blvd exceeded I0,0~ vehicles per day. They did noi have a major shopping cen~er at ~h¢ other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108d~ as it li~s up to 107th at 8th Cou~ We do not want an access road wi~h a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. if a signaled imersection al 107th Avenue is forced upon us, d~cn we ask that you include, along wkh the Barton Collier plan. n resolution Io close 107th and i08th a~ the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be ~he cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next bes~ solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into ~he shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better ~han being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. q- '~ -- - iours t~ly, ~ - Name(s) (Please PrinO ~ /o~k ~ue. ~/ ~A~.~ Telep~ohe number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, :/We /9C U.D mos', c' ,ce ned to line up 107th Avenue North with thc large new shopping center on Immakalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern Doundary road in thc project li~ing up wifl~ 107th will m'ake matters worse· We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension w~ built that thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at ~e other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th. and also 108th as it links ~ to 107th at 8th Court E. We do nm want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with thc co~ercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8uh Cour[ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve ch)sing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have l:ft mrn directional lanes oMy into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the hi,way. Yours tm y, Signature.4 Name(s) (Please Prat) . Addre$ ' . Telep Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, l/We '/"¢ xx'~,.'-t. ._c-r_.. are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the largo new shopping center on Inunokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. .... },,o.~,.,., ,,ha,ns up v.'ith 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day'. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. St> imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linkiog up to any avenue in Naplcs Park. Il' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what 'will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left tarn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4l. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Y~/~s truly, Name(s) (Please PrJnO Address Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners, I/We P7~.~ .~ 7//.~/.. /, ~ ~-'r6r~ca~- , are most concerned about the plans to line up 107di' Ave~u~ North v,:ith the lar~ new shoppino center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to beco=e a major cut-through route into the center. The a,.,-;,.o,~ southern ~- ....... ,n .... v,ojec, lipd.:ing up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th ~ it li~'~.:s up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a ligtx linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaIed intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resohttion to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~t solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: /. Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Date: /C-.l~- Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Co~issioners, I/~ fi ~', z ~ are most concerned aboul he p aris to line up I07th~Avenue N~6 wi~ the large new shopping center on I~okalce Road and US 41. This will cause 107thto become a major cut-t~ou~h route nto the ccmer Ti~e desired southern boundary road in the p.roject li~ing up w~th 107th wiIl make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road exte~ion was built that thc ~affic on Hickory Bh'd excced:d 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping cen~er at the' other end. So imagine what is goin~ to happen m 107th, and also 108th as it li~:s up to 107th at 8d~ Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up rd any avenue in Naples Park a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to dose 107th and 108th at the end of the co~erciat section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes offiy into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. [> . /~ ~ ..... , ~- -- ic.Y ri, .. Board of Count.',' Commissioners -;301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florkla 34!12 Dear Commissioners, ro line up [07th Avenue No'rth ',v~th the large new shopp ng cer,:cr on Immoka ee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-tt~ough route inte 00e center. The desired southern boundary road in the project [inking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ',,.'as built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The.'.' did not have a major shcpping center at the other end. So imagine what is going [o happen to 10700. and also 10800 as it links up to 107th at 800 Court E~ We do [lot want an access road wi00 a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 10700 Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of tile commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be 00e cheapest and simplest solution to what ,.,,'ill be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues 00eh the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ,~/--J,")/4- ~'.--4 are most cc:;.:erned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North~ the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4I. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0,000 vehicles per da.',,. ]'hey did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also i08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaIed intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan, a resoIution to close 107th a,;d 108th at the end of the con~nercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being des!toyed by huge developments across the highway. Additionalcomments: ~: ,)c-- ,-7/~-,ffz~/.;z"~{_c_, Yours tr11]v, Name(s) (Pl~e f3rint) Telephone n~mber '" 2B2 Date: " Board of Count.'.' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, l/We ~'G~'T~ o-:= 1 '~C5'~ ,q.'~.'x are- most col,cerned about the plans to line up 107th )kvenue No_~th with the large new shopping cent~.~ on In~mokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-tt~rough route into '.~e center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m'ake matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory. Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not ,have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8d~ Court E. a light linking up to an)' avenue in Naples Park. If Vv'e do not a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolut'on to c~ose 1.07th and 108th at the end of the cowa'nercial se:tion, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what '.','ill be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US ,:1. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional corrunents: Yours truly, s Name(s) '(Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples, Florida 34112 [)ear Commissioners, [/~, :cc', /% ",, - ~, .~_Z,-z.~_-~ .. L_.Zk_~'---_-are most concerned about the plans to I:i~' up 107~'~ ~ North with the laree new shoppin~ centcc on hnmokalee Road and LTS al. This will cause 107lb to become a nlajor cut-through route into the center. Tim desired somhcrn boundary road in the project li~in~ up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from (he Pine Ridge experience before the Vand~rbilt Beach Road extension was built d~at thc traffic on HickoQ' BJvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not bare a major shoppin~ center at Ibc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107dl, and also 108d~ as it links up Jo 107(h at 8Lb Court E. We do net want an at:tess road wilh a light l[~in~ up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imcrsacdon at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask dmt you include, along with die Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107tb and 108th at the end of dm commercial section, l~rming a horseshoe arouud 8tb Court E. This would be cheapest and simplest solution to ~vhat will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into [lie shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across ~e highway. A~luona[ comments~ . c, . ~, (~ .~ .... ,. <4' ~[ &~, ~ , Yours truly, , ~ .... j.."o. . ¢, . /. ~ig~., / · ~ ,I ~ , Name(s) · (Please Print) ~ ~ / ,"~:-c ~- /~ A(dre~.~ . ,, Telephone number 2fJ2 t , 330[ Tamiaoli Trail East Naptcs. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to line up 107th Avenu~ Norll~ with the large new shopping centc: on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to becom¢ a major cut-i~ough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up wi~ 107th will make matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before abe Vandcrbih Beach Road extcnsioo was built that ~ traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,0~ veblcles per day. The:/did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen ro 107th, and also 108th as it llnks up to 107th at 8th Court E, We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue hi Naples Park. Ir a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th a~ 108th at thc end or it~e commcrcird section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would bc thc cheapest and simplest solution Io what will be a major problem, If you do not approve closing these two avenues tl~en the next best solution is to have left turn dircctionaI lanes only imo the shopping ccnter fromUS41. Naples Park deservesbettcr[han being dcsiroyed by huge dcvdopmcnts across the highway. Additionalcommcnts: ~¢~ ?Y </re~ ~e~ AS~~ .o,, ~ Name(s) (Please Print) ' ' ~ Address Tdephon~ number Date'. ' Board of County Commissioocrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naplcs, FIorlda 34112 Dear to linc u~ I()7H~ Avenue NordJ witt~ Ibc large new shopping ccmcr on hnmckalee Road and US 41, This will cause i0711~ to become a major cutqhrough route into thc ccnlcr. mailers worse, We know from file Pine Ridge cxpcricnc= before d~c Var,decbik Bench Road extension was bulh dmt tim traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,~0 vchklcs per day. The7 did not have a major xhoFping cuing to happen We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon uL lhcn we ask that you include, along with thc Barren Collier plan, a rcsolu ~on o close 107th and 108th at the end of thc commercial section, Drming a horseshoe around 8~h Court E, This would be thc cheapest and simplest ~oludon to wha will be a major problem, If you do not approv: closing these two avenues then ibc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only imo Hie shopping center from US 41, Naplus Par}: deserves better H~an being dcsmr.,'cd by huge dcvch~mcnts across Ibc highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please' Print) Addrcss Tlnh Board of County Comntissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to linc up 107th Avenue North with thc larg~ new shopping ccntcr on Immoka!~c Road and US 41, This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into thc center. ~ba desired ~ouWcrn boundary road in th~ project linking up with 107th will n mauars worse, We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road cxtcnsion was built that thc traffic on ltickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day, They did not have a major shopping center at We other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108~h ~.s it links up to 107th at 8d~ Court E. Wc do not want an access road wkh a light linking up to any avenue ~n Nap[cs Park. It' a ~Jgnalcd imcrsccfion at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, thctl wc ask thai you include, along with Wc Barton Collier plan, a reso,u ion to close 107th and 108th at thc end of the commercial section, forming a horseab~ around 8th Court E, This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have Ieft turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Addilionalcomments: ~,P~5 ~.&/C ~c~ Board of Coun[y Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, , ;~' . II~Vek, ~'~Z ~'~ 'k-~..~ ,~,~ ~ are most c~ncerned about ~o l~n¢ up I07~h AvenGe North wkh fl~e larg~ new shopping ce~7:r on Immo~alee Road and US 41. This will cause 107a ~o b~come a major cub~hroueh rou~e ~nm ~h¢ cemcr. Th~ desired southern boundary r~ad in ~he p~oj¢et linking up wj~h 107~h will ma~e mauers worse. We ~now from Q~ Pine Ridge ~.xper[ence befor~ the Vanderbilt Beach Road extensio11 was built lhat ~he IrM'~ o~ Hickory Blvd ~xceede~ I0,000 vehicles per day. They did no~ have a major shopping c~n~er at ~he other end. So ~ma~Jne wha~ going ~o happen ~o 107th, and also 108th as it lSn~s up ~o 107~h a~ 8~h Co~t E. We do not want an access road wi~h a l~ght ]i~ing up ~o any avenu~ in Na~les Par~. a $1gnaled intersection at 107th Avenue ~$ forced upon us, then w~ as~ ~ha~ you along wkh ~h~ Barroa Collier plan, a resolution ~o clos~ I07~ and 10SIl~ at lhe end of the commercial section. I'o~ng a horseshoe around 8t~ Court E This would be the c~capes~ and simp[~s~ soIudon to wha~ will be a major p~obI~m, l~you do not approve Closing ~hese lwo avenues ~hen ~ next best soludon i~ to have lef~ turn directional lane~ only imo th~ shopp~n~ cen~r from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than bring destroyed by huge d~velopmen~s across th~ h~ghway. Additional commems: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Telephone number Date: /' Board of Count.'.' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We /-~e.,--&r/- ~4 ~,~ are most concerned about the plans to line up I07th Avenue North with the large new shopping cea,ret on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern bntm,~a~ ro~d in the project I~pS:ing ,p '~th 107ff~ will m~k'e matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was buih that ~e traffic on Hickory Bh, d exceeded 10,~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at ~he other end. So Jmaeinc wha~ goh~g to happen to 107th. and also 108th as We do not want an access road wi~h a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that vou include, along with thc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107& and 108th at'~e end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the nex~ best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Na~les Park deserves better than being des:toyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments:. Name(s) (Please Print) ~ddress Telephone number I Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners, I/We '-'"~'L {~"~t..L',,Z.e ]V)O2vEO,zo are most concerned ahout the pIans to line up I07th Avenue North with the lar-ie ne.v snoppmo center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07th to become a major cut4hrough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the proje= ; '-,, Imkl... up widt 107th will matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built thJt the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. 50 imatine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Cou~n E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108hh at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Name(s) (Please Prim) 5523 I,.....%~ 7~ ..q',~ Address Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners " 330i Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 341 i2 Dear Commissioners, ,O QI r concer=dahoutthepIans · ' ~are most : to line ~07th Avenue North with the large new shopping cen~er on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause i07~ to become a major cut-tNough route into the center. The desired snuthern boundary road in the project Ii.king up with 107th will m~!;e matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderb t Beach Road extension was built tMt ~e traffic on ~ickow Bird exceeded 10,~0 vehicles per day. They did not ~ve a major shopping comer at the other end. So imauine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it li~s up to 107th at 8th CoUrt E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07~ Avenue ~s forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and i08th at the end of the co~ercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8~ Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a ~jor problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues ~en the next best solution is to have left turn directionaI lanes o~y into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across ~e highway. Name(s) (Please Print~ .} ~ddrcss -- Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3.301 Tamiami TraiI East Naples. Florida 341 I2 Dear Commissioners. [,'We './/'/'-1~ ~'~,oLo'~L-= 2/ are most ccncerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping cem,:r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I0 ~h to become a malor cut-through route nte the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project iinking up w:tth 107th will m'ake matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on I~ickorv 131vd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The.',' did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So ima'2, ine what is going to happen to 107th, and also i08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not '.,,'ant an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. !f you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by' huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, SignFu~ - , Name(s) (Please PrinO Address Telephone numar Date: .~4 o. ,~,~, Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line up 107~ Avenue North with the large ~ew shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107Ih to become a major cut-tNough route into the cemer. The desired southern boundary ioad in [i~u project ii.lng up wiih i07th wiii re'ak: matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was bull[ ~at the traffic on Hickow Bh'd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a ma~or shopping center at the o[her end. So imagine what going to happen to i07~, and also 108th as We do not want an access road with a light lip2ing up a sig~led intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, ~en we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close I07~ aod 108~h at ~he end of ~e co~ercial section, fo~ing a horsesh~ around 8~ Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes o~y into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Addmonal co~ent,: Yours Na~e(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We / f ~.'~'.,.,/ z' ~c~.)::'_/;,¢'// /; t) X are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th ,~.venue North with ti~e large ne'.,/shopping ccnre': on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 10?th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with IOgth will matters worse. We know from d~e Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory, Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do nor want ao access road with a light linking up to an.',' avenue in Naples Park. If' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, aIoag with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of tl]:: commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being deslroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional commems: Yours truly, Signature ,, t/. Addre~ T~lephon~ number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trait East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We '" ~ are most concerned about the plans to llne up 107th/\venue North with the large new shopping c' '~ter on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-th, rough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th ,,viii make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the trnffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The.',' did not have a major shopping center at the other end, So imagine what is going to happen to i07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Cour~ E. We do not want an access road with a light lirddng up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled inlersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along ,,vilh the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108Ih at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Coup: E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major probler, t. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional corrtmcnts: Yours truly, .~ Signature .... Name(s) (Please Print) Address · _ 7".-" · - "/.-/ Telephone number ,, Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Eas~ Naples, Fiorida 34112 Dear Commissioners, To line up l~7th Avenue North with the large new shopping ccmer on Immokalee Road and US 4i. This will cause I07th to become a major cut4hrough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We kmow from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the trnffic on Hicko~ Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107Lb, and also 108th ~ it li~s up to 107th at 8tb Cou~ E. We do not want an access road wi~ a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask ~at you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to clnse 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to bare left turn directional lanes o~y into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additionalco~ents: ~z.q /0[~'~ [.4.'[f,J Yours t~Iy, Name(s~ (Pleas[Prigt). , ~ t' I / Te~phone n~mber - ' Datc:. , ,, Board of County Cotmnissioners 330i Tamiami Trail East Naales, FIorida 34112 Dear Commissioners. .~ most concerned abou~ the plans to line up 107~h Avenue North w~th fi~?flr~¢ new shopping c~n~er on Inm~okal¢~ Road and US 4i. This will cause ~07~ to become a major cut-~ough route into d~e cemer. The desired southern bounda~ road in ~e project li~ing up with 10?th will m'ake ma~mrs worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience ~efore the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the tmffic on Hickoo, Bird exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 10?th. and also I08th ~ i~ lip, s up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road wi~ a light Ii,rig up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask ~at you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the co~ercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Cou~ E. Thii would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing ~hese two avenues ~en the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only' into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves beuer ~han being destroyed by huge developments across ~e highway. Additional comments: 'fours truly, Name(s) (Please Prin0 A~dress Telephone number 1 2B2 Date: ' >-' ' l - ;, T' Board of Count.,,' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We <:' .,,~ .. , ~":'.,, ; "-' .~. r.~ ~'-.. w are mos~ :oncerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the h~r~c new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause tO?th to become a major cut-through route into the center· The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up w'[th i0?th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic On Hickory, Blvd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. The.,,' did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine ',,,'hat is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it li,~;s up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want aa access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you incIude, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~ and I08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This 'would be the cheapest and simpIest solution to what '.viii be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directionaI lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than bein~ destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours hqJlv Signature , x ( i W .-' .:- - '- f~, V", z,_...~ ~..:: .~' Name(s) (Please Prim) Telephone number Da[c: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Traii East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, are most concerned about the plans to line up I07th, Avenue North with the lame new shopping cea,.:,' on Immokalee Road and US 41. This :,,'ill cause 107thZto becon~e a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary, road in the project li~inz ut> w~th 107th will make matters worse. We kno:v from the Pine tE, dze experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension :vas built that thc traffic o,, }~ickory Blvd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did not bare a major sboppingcenter at the other end. So imaeine what is going to happen to I07th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, t~en we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to ',','hat :,,'ill be a major problem. If you do not approve dosing these two avenues then the next be~t solution is to have Ieft rum directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments a=oss the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature . \ Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number 12 2,1, Date: ~ ,~, .: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34t 12 Dear Commissioners. I/We ~./~.,.'-Lc '[f--?4.&~'Tv :Z£~_/ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with tile large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern Boundary road in the project lir~king np with 107th will ~ake matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on ttickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The3' did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Nnples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshue around 8th Court E. This would be the' cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next Best solution is to have left turn directiona{ lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed b.v huge developments across the highway. Additional coraments: Yours truly, Signature ' ' Name(s) (Pleake Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners , 3301 Tamiami Trail East Dear Commissioners. /? to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a maim' cut-through route into the center. The desired soulbern boundary road in the projec~ linking up wi~h 107th will make ma~ters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience bclbr¢ the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the ~raffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at lhe other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~h and 108th at ~he end of the commerciaI section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E, This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have Ieft turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: / Yours trt~', /' · // Sig'nafure/ Telephone number NOV - l g8 Board of County Com~issione~ ea. com~l, rec'd copy Board of County Commissioners ' 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Co~issioners, ~o ~ u~ lo~h ~v~uo ~o~ ~v(h ~ launch' shoppm~ c~mcF on I~mo~l~o ~o~d ~nd US 41. Th)s wU) cause IOlab ~o b~com~ a m~jo~ cm-thmush Fo~Jt~ )mo th~ co~F, matmrs worse. We know from tl~e Pine Ridge ¢xperienca before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built tha~ ~c traffic on HickoQ, Blvd ~xceedcd 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at lh~ o~her end. So imagine what is going to happen [o 107th, and aIso 108fi~ as il li~s up lo I07~h a~ 8ih Cou~ E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up [o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us, then we ~sk ~ha[ you include, along with the Barren Collier plan, a resolution [o close 107[h an~ ~08~ at the end of The commercial section, fonning a horsesh~ around 8th Cou~ E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution [o what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing ~hese two avenues ~en ~h¢ next best so!uLion is ~o have ]ef~ turn directional lanes only into the shopping ~nter from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge devdopments across thc highway. Additional comm~n~s: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) " Telephone nu~Mr Board o£ County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Eas~ Naples. Florida 341i2 Dear Commissim~crs. I/Wc ~ ]:'~:~ ~ Y~ ~ ff A /./..,;,/~[ ~ ,~are mos~ concerned about tl~e plans to line up 107th Avenu~ North with ~he large new shopping ccmcr on hnmokalce Road and US4]. Th[swilIcausc 107thtobecomea majorcu~4hrou~h mum intoth~ Thc desired somhern boundary road in the projec~ linking up wi~h 1071h will make ma~crs worse. We know from ¢h¢ Pine Ridge experience berate d~¢ Vanderbilt Beach Road exmnsion was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did no~ have a major shoppin~ cen~er a~ ~h¢ other end. So imagine wha~ ~oing ~o happen ~o 10?~h, and also 108~h as il links up ~o 107th a~ 8~h Cour~ E. Wc do nm want an access road with a light }inking up ~o any avenue in Nap}es Park. If a signaled inmrsccfion at 10~h .Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with fi~c Barton Collier phm, a resolution to close 107lb and 108th at ~h¢ end of ~h¢ commercial section, formin~ a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplcs¢ solulion to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closin~ ~hese two avenues ~hen ~he next best solution is m have lef[ mrn directional lanes only into ~he shoppin~ c~n[er from US 41. Naples Park deserves bettor [han being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional commen~s: Yours truly, JSignarure ~ Name(s) (Please i Address ~ . Board of Couniy Coll~m]ssioner:~ 3301 'l'~mfiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34! 12 I)c;~r (7ommisxioncrs. i/Wc- - ~. ~.-~,.-~ ' ": :.. '~". (' '-~J: ': ,;.--x2rc rllost COllCCrncd abo~t (lie pJalls to line up I07th Avenue North with tile large new shopping ccntc~ on hnmokalec Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4hrough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in thc project linkin~ up with 107th will make matters worse. We know t'ronl the Pine Ridge experience bcl'orc the Vandcrbilt Beach Rt~ad exlension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not h~vca major shoppingccntcr:ttthcothcrcnd Soima,inc what is Wc do not wan[ ~m access road wid~ a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imcrscction at 107d~ Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask Jliat you include, ~dong with thc Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108tl~ at d~e end of thc commercialscction, forming a horseshoe around S[h Court E. This wouldbethe cheapest and simplest solution to what will bca major problcm. Il'you do not approve ch)sing these two avenues ~hcn tl~e next best solution is to have [cl't turn directional Janes only into the shopping center t'rom US 41 N/tplcs I):~rk deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the hi~hxx:~y Addhional comments: Yours tru h,, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamianti Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line up 107tl~ Avenue Nord* with thc t:~r~ ~cw s~oppin,, center on Immokalce Road and US41. This will cause 107thtobccomca maiorcut4hrou~b rourc into the center. Thc desired southern boundary mad io the projectSinking up w~d~ 107th will make matters worse. We know from rim Pine Ridge experience before tim Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center a~thc othcrend. So imagine what is going to happen to I07tb, nod also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We du not want an access road with a [igbt linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collicr plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4i. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Y~mlv, Name(s) (Please Prim) 1 Board of County Commissianers 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida .~411_ Dear Commissioners. I/We ._] J-.~,',~ ~?; r,'/.'~..:.z~./~f~7, c- ~ ~' are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North &ith the large new shopping center on Imm&alee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cot-dwough rnu[c into thc center. Thc desired southern boundam' road in the project linkin, uo with 107th will make matters warse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that tl~e traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the od~er end. So imagine what is ~oin~ to happen to 107th. and also i08th as it links up to 107th at 8tb Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Same(s) (Please Prim)m'~ .~d~' 4~' :'" ' ~' Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 341 I2 Dear Commissioners, to line up 107th ,Avenue ?'{ort~ with the larg~ new shoppin~ center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary, road in the project linking up with 107th'will mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the. Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on HickoU' Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to i07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Cout7 E. We do not want an access road with a light }inking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then ;:'e ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mm directional laaes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dev~lopments across the highway. AdditionaI comments: Yours truly. 1 2B2, Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trai! Fast Naples, Florida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners. I/.~e ~z-/z,qih~Tt'l xld~(5~ I',9 ~ are most o;ncerncd about the plans ro line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4t. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m'ake matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen m 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8tl~ Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th atld 108th at thc end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution m what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves ~uer than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Additional co~ents:~ Yours t~ly, Namt(s) (Please Prim) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamianli Trail Eas~ Nap!es. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to hnc up 107fl~ Avenue North with thc large new shopping CCil~Cr nn Inlniokalcc Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cutdhrough route into the comer. Thc desired s~mthern boundary road in the project linking up wifl~ 107d~ will make matters worse. Weknow from the Pine Ridge experience bcforc thc VanderbihBcach Road extension was built fl~at the traffic on Ilickor) Bird cxcccdcd 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th. and also 108th as ii links up to 107th at 8fl~ Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up m any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is foxed upon us. then wc ask that you include. along with thc Barron Collier plan. a resolution lo close 107th an,I 108th at thc end al' thc commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would bc tim cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next bust ~lution is to have Ich turn directional lanes only into the shopping center Rom US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developmcnls across the highway. Yours truly, Name(s) (Please PrinO Tclephone number [)c~)r C0mlllJgg~OngFS. n) linc up 107H~ Avenue ~orl)l wi(i) Ibc large new sh~ppin~ comer Thc dcsircd s~JJ}lcrrl boundary m;~d M Ibc prnjccl ]inkin~ Lip wi[il 107111 wilt rnakc m;iHcrg wf)r~c ~Vc kn~w From J)lc Pine Ridge cxpcrJcncc hclorc ;hc V;indcrbiiI )leach Rm~d cxicnxi(m waC huih fh;m[ ibc lr;fffic ~}n Hickory Bird cxcccdcd If).~ vehicles per day. They did not h;mvc ;~ major shopping center at thc mhcr end. So imagine whr~t is g~)ing u) h;~ppcn to 107lh. and also 108lh as it links up Wc do not warn an access mad ~ith a light linking up Io any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, (hen w,: ask tlmt y,)u include, ;Hong with thc Barton Collier plan. a rcsoluti(m fl~c commercial sccdcm, 1brining a horseshoe around gib Court E. This would hc thc chcapcstand simplest soludm~m what willbea rmuor problem. IFyoudo nm approve ck)sJn~ these tw~) ;ivcnucs then thc next bcgt soluth>n is [o h;l',C left turn dircctionM lanes only imo thc shopping center From US 4i. Naples ['ark dcscrvcs hcHcr than being destroyed hy hugc dcvch~pmcnts across thc highway, Additional comments: Board of' Coum;,, Commission,.:';s 330I Tamiami Tf;~il Easl ;,/aplcs, Florida ~4112 I)car Commi~sioncrs. lo linc up !07all Avenue Nord~ wid~ Ibc large new sh~pin~ comer on Imrn.~kalcc Road and US 4I. This will cause 107th to hccomc a major cutdhrough route into Ibc center. Ihc desired southern boundary road in Ibc project IJ~ing up w~lh 107Ih will make mntmrs worse. Wc know ~rom thc FMc Ridge cxpcriencc hcfl)r~ thc Vandcrbil/Beach Road extension wa,~ built that ~hc traffic on tlickory Bird exceeded I0,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping cemcr at t~ mbcr end. So imagine what going ~,~ happen to 107th. ;md ;llso 10~/h as it IJn~s ~ to 107th al ~th Court Wc do not want an access road will] a light linking ~ to any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled intcrscclJon at 107Ih Avenue is forced upon us, then wc ask that you Jflcludc, along with thc Barton Collier pl;m, a resolution to close 107Ih ~,nd 108/I] at thc end the commercial section, fl)truing a horseshoe around ~ Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing/hose two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping comer from US 41. Naples Par~ deserves better than being destro~,cd by huge developments across thc highway. Tclc~nc numar 3301 Tanli:uni Trail Naplc,~. bh>rid;l 34112 l ),,:';~ r C(mmfis';hmcrs. [,'We _. ,' . / .' - ,, h~ linc up t07d~ Avenue North with thc hmrge nct~ st~,)ppin~ ecu;er ~m Jmmokalcc Road ;md US 41 This ,,rill cuusc ]07th to become a major cut-througt: rouge into ll~e center. Thc desired s~mthcrn hound;try road in thc project linking up with 107th will make maucrs worse. Wc know from thc Pine Ridge experience bctbrc thc Vanderbilt Beach Road cxlcnsion was built thai tl~c traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per d:ty. They did not have a major shopping cenler at (l~e ocher end. So imagine what Js going u) happen (o 107dL and also 108ch as il links up to 107th at 8ch Court E. We do not want ;m access road wid] a light linking up to ;my avenue in Naples Park. a ~Jgnalcd intersection at 107di Avenue is fi)reed upon us, d~cn x~c ask dxJt you include, along with thc Barron Collier plan. a resolution to ch)sc 107d~ ;md 108th ac ll~e end of thc commercialsccdon, formim, ahorsesho~around 8thCourt E. This would bcthe cheapest and simplest solution to what will he a nlafi}r problem. IF wm do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solmmn is lo have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 4I, Naples Park deserves better than bcingdcstroycd by ugc devch)pments across the highway. Additional conlmcnts: Yours truly, Signamr¢ Name(s) (Please Pri~/ --, c, t 1, Address Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail [last Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to linc up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on [mmokalee Road and (.IS 4/. This will cause 107th to become a major cm4hrough route into the center. ]'he desired southern boundary road in the projec~ linking u? with I¢lTfh wilt make mat~crs worse. We know /'rom [he Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension '.,,'as buih that the Iraffic on Hickory BIvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per da.','. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine ',','hat is going [o happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do no( wan[ an access road wkh a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. [hen we ask [hat you include, aIong with {he Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 10$th at thc end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This WOdld be the cheapes[ and simplest solution to what ;','iii be a major problem. If you do no[ approve closing these tv,'() avenues then the next best solution is to have left [urn directional lanes only' into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves be(let thao being destroyed by huge dcv¢lopmcms across the highway. Additionalcommems: \~'-~NF Ccu~i"V ("r;cc, c'c,~,%A~r.,MEf{'~ Yours truly, Name(s) (Plcase Print~._ ~--' Address Telephone number 1 2B2 Board of Count.',' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Nzplcs, Flurida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners, I/We -~'c--_ ~x-,-,.,,.~, ~ · '--<--~,..~'--, are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee P, oad and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. ................... ,, ......... road m thc project linking up with 107th will -'~" matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day The.,,' did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. Il" a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to '.','hat will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only' into the shopping center from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. /~'-', Name(s) (Please PrJnl) ,Address Telephone number Date: ' ' ' ' Board of Coumy Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. 1o linc up 107th Ave}~u~ North Citb the lar~ new si~opping ccater on Immokalee Road and US41. This will cause 107tbtobcco~amajor cutq~ough route into thecunter. The ~esire~ southern 5~und2ry road in the project li~2:ing up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine ~ge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic o* Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day. They did no~ have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th ~ it links up to 107th ar 8th CoUrt E. We do not want an access road with a Iig~ linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled inmrsection at 107tb Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a reso~tion to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, t~rming a horses~ around 8th Court E. This would b¢ thc cheapest and simplest solution to what w~ be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next b~t solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from ~S 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcvdopments amss the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number -- Baard of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/~ /(~ ~ are most c~ncerned about the plans to lin~ up rO7th Avenue N~r~ wiLh thc larze new shoppina center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route intu the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandefbitt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da[. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what going ra happen to 107th. and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up a signaled intersection nt 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask thai you include, along with thc Barron Collier phm, a resolution to close 107th a~d 108th at the end of thc commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8d~ Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing lhese two avenues then the next best solution is lo have left turn directional lanes only into iht shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: ap :s , T~l~?hon~ number o 1 Board of County Commissioners 330t Tamiami Trail Easl Naples. Florida 34112 I)ear Commissioners. ~~ , ~,~ ~ are mos concerned about thc p aris lo hne up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on lmmokalee Road and US41. This will cause 107thtobccon~:amajorcut.through route into the center. Thc desired soutbcrn boundary road in thc project linking up with 107Ih will make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before the Vnnderbilt Beach Road extension was built that tim traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th ~ it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signnled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plnn. a resolution to close I07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. Il'you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~ solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better thnn being destroyed by huge developments acres the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Nametsl (Please Prim) Address -07 Y Telephone number 1 2B 2 3301 Tamiami Trail Naple~. Flat,da 3411 Dc;ir Conlnlm~inncr~. l,> linc up [rJ7th Avcnu~ Nl~rlh wilb Ibc large new shopping cunlcr on lllllllOk;llgg ~o~ld '['he desired sotilbern boundary road in Ibc projccl linking up w~lh J0JtJl wJli make m;mers worse We know l'r~ml Ibc Pine Ridge experience hot'tm: thc V;mderbJll Beach R,~ad ex[cnsi,m wax huill thai thc trafl'ic on I]ickory Blvd exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. 'l h,zy dxt nm have a n:aj,u' shopping comer at [hc mhur end ,No imagine what is gmnu u) happen u) 107Ih. ;md We do not want :m access rmM with a ligll[ linking up 1o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intcrscclion al 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask [hat you include, along with ff~c Barton Cullicr phm, a rcsolulion 1o ch)se lf)7lb and 108lb at lhe end o~' the commercial section, formmga horseshoe around 8tbCour[ E. This wauld belbc cheapcs~ and simp/cst soludon to wba[ will be a major pmblum. [1' you do no[ ;~ppravc lanes only into [Jlc sbopph]g COllier fro)ii1 U~ 41, Naples ['ark dcscrvss heucr Iban Additional comments: Board of Cnunly Comnlissi,mcrs 3301 '['amianli Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissianers. /,<¢,, /., / ' ........ ~- <;~:~ .......... arc mo~t c:'qccrncd about bcp N) linc up lf)7th Avenue N,HIh with thc large new si~oppinu center on hnmokalcc Road ~md US 41. This will cause 107th tu become a major Ctltqhrgggh route imo ti:c con;ct, Thc desired souti~ern bound:,ry rnad in ~hc project linkin~ up w~rh lO7th will make mauersworsc. Wcknow from tt~c Pine Ridge expcricnc~ bcfore thc VanderbiltBcach Road extension was built rha~ thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0.000 vchlclcs per day. They did nol bavc a m;~jor shopping center al ~hc other end. So imagine what going to h;~ppcn ro 107d~. and also 108d~ as it links up to 107[h at 8th Court E. We do not want an access ru;~d with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled imcrscct~on at 107rh Avenue is Forced upon us. then we ilsk that you illth/dc. along with the Barton Collier phm. a resolution to cl(>sc 107th ;mt; 108th at'{ho end of thc commcrcM section, t~rnfing a horseshoe around 811~ Court E. This would bc thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these lwo avenues tbcn rite next besl solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41, Naples P:~rk deserves better than being dcslroycd by huge developments across tim highway. Additional commems: Yours truly, F, oard of Counly Comn~issk,~crs 3501 Tanfiami Trail East Naples, ,r:lorida 34112 I)car ~s. . ~:,~?C~ ~~ arc most co~ccrncd about Ibc p a s ~o hne up 107th ~e~ Norff~ wid~ the ~ ............ , and US 41. This will cause 107th to hecon]c a maj~)r cut-through roulc inlo tl)c cemcr. Thc d~:sircd soud~crn boundary road in tile projeci linking up wid~ 107th will make matters worse. We know from ll~c Pine Ridge experience before thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that die ira fl0c on Hicko~ Bird exceeded I0,000 'vehicles per day. They did nm have a major shopping center at c other end So imagine what is going u) happcr] to 107ih. and also 108th as it links up m 107dj al 8dl Courl E. We do not want an access road wid~ a light lJ~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107lb Avenue is forced upon us. dion we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 1071h aqd 108th at thc end or d~c commercial section, forming a borscsb~ around 8ih Court E. This would be the cheapest nod simplesl solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve ch)sing these two avenues then thc ncxl best ~ludon is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping centcr from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by bugc dcvdopmcnts across the highway. Additional commenls: You~-$ truly. :5'. Telephone number 1 2B2 Board of County Commissioners 330t Tamiami 'Frail East Nap[cs. F~orda 34. I 12 Dear []onlrnisslo ~ are most concerned abou[ thc plans ~o Fine up 107th Avenue Nnrth with thc large new shopping cen:,:r on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to beco~ a major cut-through route info the center. The desired southern bounda~ road in the ~ect ii~ing up with 107th will make matters w orse. We ~ow from the Pine Ri~e experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was buih that the traffic on HickoO, Blvd exceeded 10,000 ~cl c~es per da~. They did not havea major shopping ~nter at go~nz to happen to 107th, and also i08th ~ it links up to 107th a~ 8fl~ Court E. We do not warn an access road with a lighi li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107dj Avenue is forced upon us, ~en we ask ~a[ you include, along with ~e Barton Collier plan, a rcsolmion to close 107g~ and !08d~ at fl~e end of the CO~ercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8~ Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve dosing these two avenues then ~he next be~ solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only imo thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge devdopments acr~ d~¢ highway.. Additional comments: Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, l/We'_ ,,[~S-,t/' ~ j/~i.(/i~[~ aremostccncernedabouttheplans to line up I0,th A/enue North with the large new shopping cen...r on Irrm't. okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut41'u'ough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m~ke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extortion was built that the traffic on Hickory. Bird exceeded 10,00'7, vehicles per day. The.,,. did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to i07th, and also I08th as it links up to I07th at 8Lb Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any aveuue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at ~e end of the cormnercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional corrunents: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) rP ease Print) Telephone number Board of County Cnmmissinners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioner:,. ro line up 107th Avenue North the large new shopping center on lmmokalec Road and US 4i. This will cause I07th to ~come a major cut-through roum into thc center. The desired southern bounda0, road in the project [inking up w:ah i07th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was buih tha~ the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,0~ vebicles per da?. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to hap~n ro 107th. a~ also 108th as it links up [o 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at I07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at ~e end of thc commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution [o what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues thru the next best solution is [o bare left turn directional lanes only into the sbopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Yours truly, ~) Telephone number 12B2 '; Date:i/ 0~'"' -'~l ~ Board of Counl? Commissioners 3.301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 3.41 I2 Dear Commissioners. I/We C -'-;,~=.G.<_- _Gl_.& 7- ,~,,h ~.:~ (,, t are most c' ~cerned about the plans (o line up 107th ..\'.enue North with the large n¢,,v shoppin~ center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This ,,rill cause 107th to become a major cur-through route into the center. Tile desired soud~crn bound:lry road in the project linking up ',;'itl) !07th ',v[ll make matters Worse. V'/c know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on t-'}ickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da.,,'. The.,,' did not ha;'e a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going [o happen tu 107th, and also 108th as it links up [o i07th at 8th Court E. ",¥'e do not :,.'ant an access road with a light linking up to an.,,' avenue in Naples Park. It' a signaled intersection at 107ih :\venue is tbrced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier ptan. a resolution to close 107th a:~d 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court £. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these ~wo avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature ~,Z~' Name(s) (Please Prim} Address T:lcphon¢ number B,~ard of Coumv Commissioners 3301 Tamiaml Trail East ~' Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commijsioners. I/We ~_:~(~./j~_~ ( ~l~,x~, are most c .;cerned about thc plans m line up I07th Avenue North with thc large new shopping center on Immokalec Road and US41. This will cause [07thio becomea majorcut-throu~h route into thecentcr. Thc desired southern boundary road in the project iinkin~ up w~d] 107th w]II make matters worse. Weknow from me Pine Ridge experience hctbrc the VandcrbiitBeach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what going to happen to i07th, and also 108th as it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is tbrced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with thc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close [07th ~,:,d 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8thCourt E. Thiswould bethe cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. It' you do not approve closing these two avenues tl~cn thc next best solution is t() have left turn directional lanes o~y into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: You rs'i.~,~y., Si~ature ~ Name(s) (Please Print) Telephone number Board of Connty Commissbmcr:~ 3301 Tamiarni Trail Eust N;Lplcs, Florida 34Zi2 Dear Commissioners, ~ lin-,,--~n* .~ ~ ' ..... ~'~ [ ''~ mos¢c,.nccrncd abou c p aris · ~-p ,,~,~ '~cnuc]~or w~ ] ~e argencwshoppin~ccmeronimmokalec ~oad and US 41. Th~s will cause 107th u~ become a major cut-through rome into the center. Th~ desired sou[hem boundary road in the project Hnkin~ up w~d~ 107d~ will make ma[tersworsc. Weknow from(hcPincRid~eexpcrienc~b~tbrclhe VanderbikBeach Road ¢x[cnsian was buih ~ha[ thc [rat'ftc on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 v~hicl~s per day. They did no[ have a majorshoppin~cen[era~theo[herend. Soima~inewha[is ?ing [o happen [o 107[1~, and also 108fl~ as i~ links up to ~07d~ a~ 8th Court E. We do not want an access road wid~ a lighl linkin~ up [o any avcnu~ in Naples Park. It' a signaled intersection at 107d~ Av~nu~ is fbrced upon us. [hen we ask that you include, along wi~h the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th a,;d 108Ih a[ the end of the commercial sect/om /brining a horseshoe around 8~h Court E This would be ~he cheapest and simplest solution u) what will be a major problem It' you do not npprove closing these two avenues then thc nc,x~ bes~ solulion is io have left turn directional lanes only into ehe shopping cenicr from US 41. Naples Park deserves beuer than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature ~e(s) (PlcasePrinO Telephone number 1 2B2' Board of County Commissioners .3301 Ta~mami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioner~ , , --- ~ ~,--~-- are most c(,::cerncd about d~e plans to line up 107th Avenhc North with thc large new shoppinu center on [mmc~kalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to beco~ a major cut-t~rough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with [07th wilt mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road exte~ion was built that ~he traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.~ vehicles per day. They did nor haven major shopping ~nter at the othcr end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th ~ it links up to I07th at 8~ Court E. We do not want an access road with a Iighl linking up to any avenue hi Nap/es Park, If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. d~en we ask that you include. along with ~e Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th alld 10801 at the end of ~e Commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8~ Court E, This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem, If you do not approve closing these two avenues then dm next be~ solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4 l, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge devek)pments acr~ thc highway. Additional Co--eats: Yours truly, /1 z~ $igffatuJ'e " - Name(s) (Please Print) Ad~rc$~ ' Telephone number 12B2 Date: ,' ' ~ ~ '," Board of County Ctmlmissioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Napfes. Florida 3,11[2 Dear Commissioners. arc most co~:crned about file plans to line up 107th Avenue North with tl~ large new shopping center on Immcxalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to bcco:~ a major cut-through route into the center, The desired southern bounda~ road in the project li~ing up with 107th will mkke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience ~fore the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory 81vd exceeded I0.0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at d~e other end. So imagine what is going to happen m I07dL and also 108th ms it links up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road wid~ a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imersecdon at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. ~en we ask that you include. along with ~c Barton Collier plan. a resolution ~o close 107~ and 108th at the end of · e co~ercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what wiI[ ~ a major problem. If you do not approve dosing these two avenues then the next be~ solution is to have left ~urn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US41. Naples Park deserves be~ter than being destroyed by huge developments acres thc highway. Additional comrnems: Y°url ,tt~'~iY,-' (--,, . . Signatu~,:/ Name(s) (Plca:~c Prim) . ] Address Tdephon¢ I1U nlb~:r 330I 'l;LI~li;md Trail East NapIc,,. Florida 34112 Thc alL'Nixed S~)LJIhcFII boulld;ir)' r'()ad hi thc project linking up w~tJl ]07th will make R(}ad cxicnshm was huih Ih;il Ibc IF;IFFiC ol1 Hickory l~h'd cxcc'cdcd lO,O00 vchiclcs per day, They did nm have a major shopping c~nl~r at thc other end, So inl;iginc whal is - . I apJcs Park. J;l[lCS only inh) dlc shopping tumor fi'om US 41, Naples Park deserves belier [Jlilri hcirlg dcslr?'cd hy huge tIcvuIopH~CIHS ;ICfOSS Ibc highw;ty .'~ddititmal commct~ts: Yours truly, Signature --- ,'~u f: /:'~.,," . .... Address / ' 1 2B2 3301 'l';mfi:tmi 'h'aii Naples. FIm'kla ~411} h) hnc up 107d~ ,,Xvcnuc Nm'th withqhc large, llcw shop[)in~ c~BJcr oll Jmmukalcc and ITS41 This willcausc 107th[obccomea majorcuHhrough rou[c into thcccmcr. matters worse Wu klloW h'orn thc Pillc Ridge cXpCl'iCllCc before thc ValldcrbiJl Road extension was tmih tl~;l[ Ibc traffic on [lickory Blvd cxcccdcd 10.000 vehicles per day. They did nor have a m:tjor shopping center at Ibc other cod. So hlla~ine what is going h) happen [o 107th. and also 10S0t as it links up [o 107th at &h Co~rJ Wc do not want an access road wid~ a light linking up to any ;wcnuc in Naples Park. If a signaled imcrsccrion ;il 107[h Avcouc is lbrccd upon us, then wc ask [hat you include. along with risc Barron Collier pi:re, a resolution to close 1070~ and 1080~ at thc end thc commcrciaJ section, forming a h{)rscshoc around &h Court E. This would hc thc kmcsonly into d~cshoppingccmcr from U$41. Naples P:u'k deserves better being dcslru}cd by huge dcvchDmcnts across Jl~c highway. Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We~Q,c"~.'-~ ~O~--t~,~' are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North svith tile large new shopping comer on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m~ikc matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per da.,.'. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen [o 107d]. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We dc) not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. Il' a signaled intersection at I07d~ Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be tile cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~t solution is to have left turn directionaI lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the high~vay. Additional commems: Yours truly, :5,J,gnatu re ) , Name(s) (Please Prinr~ Address Telephone number :L ~K~3M t T~ BUCFLERS R~/}~ ~. ; 941 4c~i~:_~0 H,-~. ~9 1998 (~5:~4PM P1 Bo~-d of Counb Corem a 330i Ta.m~ami Trail Napl:~, Florida 34I 12 Dear ~d WS 41. '/'his will cause 1 ),t}, ~o ;e~ome a ajor cutehrou~ :'ou~4 JHD the center. wor~, %'e ~ow from fl~e Pine Ridge expefio~e before ~ Vanderbilt Beach Ro~d ex~sion ..vm~ built ~at d~e ~r~t'fic o~HfcRo~ Bird exce~ed 10,000 vehicle~ ~v day 'f~y did noth~ve, m~mr shopping c=mIer at ~e off:er ~d. So imagine ~at is going to happen to 107th. ~d also 1OS~t a~ it I{~:s up to I07~ at gth Cou~ g. - We do riel trail[ an ac~sz road wi~ a light/i:~ing up to =~v avctm= in Napl=s Park, Ifa signaled b;~r~ection at 1U/,h .~enHe l~ fl.,need upon ,i~. ~bmt we a ~k that yoH commercia~ *e,:~or. fo~in~ a ho~sh,~ aro~uid g8) Court E ~.~ ~to~ d be Olc cheapest aHg simplest s&,rkm ' ' ;o w~mt wii/~ ~ major probi~{. If you do nor approve c]osi~g huge deveiopmenN acros: the hiehwav. ' ' · Addifio~:~{ commznrs: Board o(' Counly 330l Tamiam~ Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 De;Jr Commissioners. l/We --.~i~c .... ~ (~ ~-7~f/'~'/.*~ are mnst concerned about Iht plans it) linc Lip 107th Avenue North with [be large new sboppiag cor][,:l' o[1 hnmokalee Road and US 41 This will cause 107th to become a maj~,r cuNhrmluh rou[c in~o [l~e center. Thc desired s~)uthcrn houtKlary road in the project linking up wTth 107th will make matters worse, kVe know from the Pirie Ridee experience heR)re the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on l~ic~ory Bird exceeded 10.O00 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. going to happen to I07tb. and also 108th as We do m)t want a~ access road whh a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intcrscctbm at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then wu :~sk that you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th anti 108Ih at the end of thc commercial section, f~)rmmg a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will bca major probit;n, If you do no~ approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is ti) have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than bring destroyed by huge dcveh)pmcnts across the highway. Additional comments: You,.,s'tru ly, Name(s) (~se Prim) Address ' Telephone number 1282 Bourd of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami '['rail East Naples, Florida 3-1.I 12 Dear Commissioners. [/We"~',i"P\c't"tzl ~'~'1 ~-x ~emost ct:;,cerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue No~[I~ with the large new shopping center on hnm~kalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route inIo the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project li~ing up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from ~e Pine Ridge experience be/bre thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc Iraffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did notbavca major shopping center at 0m otber end. So imagine what is going ro happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th ar 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, 0mn we ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th aad 108th at the end of the commercial seoion, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solutkm to what will be a mi0or problem. If you do not approve ch>sing lhese two avenues then thc next best solution is m bare left ~urrl dircclional lanes only into the shopping center from US41. Naples Park deservesbcttcr than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway Additional comments: Yours truly. Board of' County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Comm~,ssioners. I/We //~.. ' ' · u"vt--. . ~Z ,~~- 7-~__ arc most co~,cerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large ,ew shopping cenfc~ on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m;ake matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. The7 did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up tn 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we. ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolulion to close 107th and I08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe'around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what wilI be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Narne(s!~ (Please Prim) Address Telephone ~umber 1 B~,'ard of County Commissinners 330[ Tamiami 'Frail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line u'p 107th Ave'~uc North' ~ith the large nc~hoppin~ center on I~nokalee Road and U$4I. This willcaus¢ 107thtobeco~a major cut-through route into thc center. The desired southern boundary road ia the project linking up with 107th will mhke matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that ~e traffic on Hickou Blvd exceeded 10,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping ~nter at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th, and also I08th ~ it li~s up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road with a light }i~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with ~c Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~ and i08~ at ~e end of ~]e co~ercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8~ Coug E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing ~ese two avenues ~en the next be~ solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acr~ ~e highway. Additional comments: Name(s) (Pleas~Print) ,z . } Ad'ess T~J~phon~ numar i2B2'tI Board of County Commissinners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Corrumissioners. l/We ~I~'~l { ('Ir ? F4 "~ '(-' ~0L-/ I ('-~ are most c':ncerned about the plans to lint: up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-thro*,gh route into the center. The desired southern boundary road irt the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also t08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th ::nd I08th at the end of the commercial section, forrrdng a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This woutd be tine cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Name(s) (Please Print) Address ,! Telephone number '~ Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Fast Naples, Florida 34119.2 Dca~ Commissioners, ,,,,, /_y%~_. ~--Y,:.'c.:-- , - ,-, l/ v~.,cf~,,~,~..,,~_. ./ -~. c /'~-~z;' t..-'"~--"--ar¢ most c~,ncemed about tile plans to.~e up 10?th Avenue Norfl~ with thc large new shoppin~ comer on Immokalc¢ Road and US 41. This will cause 107ih ~o ~com¢ a major cubd~rough roue into ~hc cen~er. Thc desired somhcrn boundary road in ~¢ projec~ li~ing up wi~h 10?th will m~ke mat~crs worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that d~e ~affic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,~ vehicles day. They did not have a major shopping cemer at the o~hcr end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107~h, and also 108th as it li~s up to 107fl~ a~ 8~ Court E. We do not want an access road wi~h a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled ~merscction a~ 107ch Avenue is forced upon us. ~en we ask that you include, alon~ wi~h lhe Barton Collier plan, a resolution ~o close i07~h and 108~h a~ thc end of ~he co~ercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8~h Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solmion to whac will be a major probIcrn. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have I¢1~ turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park desexes better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. ... - ?-' -,/ .-/ , ~'LSig~ v" . ~ ' Name(s) (Please Prim) , Td~phon¢ number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Fiorida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We I', '"~..2-~-kg~_-:.~":.mLd'5/b t. are most concerned about the plap, s to tine up lq~Tth A;'enue North with thc large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. 1'he desired southern boundary, road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to I07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to dose 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve dosing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional cormmcnt~: Yours truly, Signature / Address Telephone number [J~)ard oI County Conunissi~mcrs 3.;01 T,~miami Tr;fil Naples. FMrida 34]12 lzWe _~_~. ,., , .7 ~ .' ~ arc most c.:.ccrned al)out thc plans to linc up 107th Avenue N~rdt with thc a~)~c new ~hoppin~ center on lnlmt,kalc~ Road :md US 41. This will CitUSC l(}~lll tO bccJ)lnc a major cut-through route into thc can/er. Thc desired southern boundary ri)ad in thc project linking up with I07lh will make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before [l~e Vanderbih Be:Ich Road extension was built d]a[ thc traffic on [lickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping ccntcr at the o/her end. So imagine what is going ltl happen Wc do not want an access road wid~ a light linking up a signaled intersection at 107lb Avenue is Ih,reed upon us. [bc~ wc ask theft you include. along with thc Ban'tm Collier plan. ii rcsolumm to close 107~11 and 108lh al thc end of thc commcrcinl section, t'(>rmin~ a h~n-scsh~c around 8lll Court [;. This would he thc cheapest and simptcst solution to what will be a majnr problem. If you do not approve closing thcs~ two avenues then thc next best solution is [o have let~ turn directional lanes only into rim shopping center Rom U5 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across tl~c high~vay. Additional commcms: Yours truly. S~na( , ~ ' ' ' c~ ~'(1.-_. I ./ Name(s) (Please PrinH Address Td~phone numl~r Date: ,' Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail Easl Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. -T,~ z:'- '~-;-' z"' l/We K~. . -. are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue No~h with the large new shopping cen~er on Im~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to becm~ a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in thc project limking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hicko~ Bird exceeded 10,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping ~nter at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th ~ it li~s up to 107th at 8d~ Court E. We do not want an access road with a ligb~ti~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, ~en we ask ~at you include. along with ~e Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~ and i08~ at ~e end of · e co~ercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8~ Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing &ese two avenues then the next be~ solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better' than being destroyed by huge developments acr~ ~e highway. Additional comments: / ~, / - , / / ,- , ;~<' '"~.<" '"c' .', ~-' 'I ' ~---:, ~ .... .~'.~:', ~f' Yours truly, ,' .,,.,.//./... Sig/~anJre Name(s) (Please Prin0 Address ','.,'.'/ i /,."~ ' '!.. Telephone number /,',~ 2' ' -- /~ ,:/.~ Board of Cour~ty Commissioners 330[ Tamiami Trait East Naples, Florida 34I 12 Dear Corrunissioners, I/We · ' "" __ are most cr, ncerncd about the plans to linc up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the ccnler. The desired southern boundary, road in th{2 project Iinking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did nor have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th :md 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly', Name(s) (Please PrinO Address Telephone number 1282 {)ate: ~ - ' Board o: County Commissioners 3301 Tarniami ]'rail F. ast Napks, Florida 34i 12 Dear Commissioners, I/We [~ ~-7'V.~ ~ct(~¢~ arc mvsl c 'nccrned about thc plans to linc up 1O7th Avenue North with risc I:trgc new shopping center nfl lmmokalcc Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-throagh route ioto die center. The desired southern boundary road in the prQect linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience be/bre the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8¢h Co~t E. We do not want an access road wid~ a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection ar 107th Avenue is R>rced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with tbe Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close [07th and 108th at [be end of the commercial section, tbrming a horseshoe around 8th Court g. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center Rom US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Board of County Conmlissioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail Hast Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. II,Vt ~ l~G'hk'r~'V%-- arc most concerned about thc plans lo linc up 107d~ Avenue Nord~ with die large new shopping cc~tcr on Immokalec Road and US 41. This will cause 107Ih to become a nlioor cut-through route into ihe center. Thc desired soutbcrn bour~dar'y road in the project li~aking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know h'om tile Pine Ridge experience before die Vanderbi[~ Beach Road extension was built that thc Irafl]c on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0.0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a maj~r sliopping cen~er at ~he o~hcr end. So imagine what is going to happen to i07~h, and also 108tl~ as it liuks up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Nnples Park. If a signaled intersection itl ]07lb Avenue is forced upon us. then v.'e ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier phm, a resolution to close 107th and 108tl~ at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8d~ Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not npprove closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into lhe shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Na~n3t.~s) (Pleasc; Prit~t) ~ Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34.! 12 Dear Commissioners. I/We ~"~ ' , ,,'~'~ ,rS",:_ !. ,-' , · r: are most c~ncerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-thzough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the I~roject linking up with 107th will m~ke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th ax it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th ~wA 108th at t.he end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a majer problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next bes~ solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by' huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Nam~) (Please PrinI) Telephone number Date: Board of Count>' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ?(/( l,oc/ '½ p.. *.. ~ .,//..~ r'~:,: are most .oncerned about thc phms to line up 107th Avenue North with [he h{rge new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4hrough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory B]vd exceeded 10,000 vehicDs per day. ]'hey did not have a mltjor shopping center at the other end. St) imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to alt.',' avenue in Naples Park. I£ a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is tbrced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by' huge deveh)pments across thc highway. / (--0' , t.~. / Additional commen,s:_!' /.eO.<5_ r~leSc, tO"'2r Yours truly, Signature Namers) (Ple=e Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Conlmissioncrs 3301 Taminmi Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Co~issioncrs, I/We . ~3 ~. are most concerned about thc plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokale¢ Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project li~ing up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built d~at the traffic on Hicko~ Blvd exceeded i0,~0 vehicIes per day. They did not have a major shopping cemer at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107ih, and also 108~h as i~ li~s up ~o 107~h at 8~ Coua E. We do not want an access road with a light Ii.lng up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, ~en we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being des,troyed by huge deveIopmems across the highway Yours truly, Si 5 e/' Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of Count.,., Comr~issioners 3.30! Tamiami T~ail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/V,'e .... ~>~ ?.-,"'--~ i '!'.".'; ;'~, are most concerned about the plans to line up 107Ih Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Tim desired southern boundary road in thc project linking up with 107th wilI make matters worse Wc know from the Pine Ridge experience befGre the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da.','. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going m happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to i07th at 8th Court E. We do not wan£ an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Cour~ E This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly .. Signature _' ' ',~ 1 Namels) (Please Prinl5 Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 330~. Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 3.¢i 12 Dear Commissioners, I/We___ ,~-L... ~"~ '-'...' '~,. J- fl are most concernod about the plans to linc tip 107th Avenue North with Ibc large new shopping cch:er on Immokalce P, oad and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route imo the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory BIvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th. and also 108th ~s it lit~ks up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask tha: you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what wilt be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number 1 / Board of County Commissi~mcrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners. I/We ~ (f&~m ~ are most v"ncerned about the plans to linc up 107d~ Avenue Nnvth with ~l~e large new shopping center on hnrnokalce Road and US 41. This will cause IO7th to becmne a major cut-through route into the The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make maucrs worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before Ibc Vandcrbiit Beach Road extension was buih tl~a~ t~ traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 veldcles per cia?. They did not have a major shopping cemer a~the other end. So imagine wb;n going la happen to 107ih, and also 108d~ as i~ links up to 107~h at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a ligh~ ]i~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced opon us. then we ask that you include, along wi~h the Barton Collier ptan, a resolution to close i07[h ;,~ 1081h at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8ih Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution lo wha~ will be n major problem. If you do not npprove closing these two avenues then ~he next besl solution is to have left ~urn directional lanes only imo d~e shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better thnn being destroyed by huge developments across tl~e highway. Addhional comments: ~ ~ ~e~ ~.~y~ a~ ~ Si~na~ Name{s} (Please Print) Addres~ Td~phone number t'Joard of County Commissi,mcrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34It2 Dear Commissioners, ~o lh~ up 107(h Avenue Nort~ whh [h~ lar~ ~,¢ shoppin~ cer,;r o~ [n~moka[c~ ~oad and U2 4t. This will cause 10?d~ to b~com6 a major cub~hroush rout~ imo thc c~mer. Thc d~ircd southern hounda~ road in d~¢ pro~cc~ linkm~ up wi[h tO?th wilt make m:([crs wor~c. Wc know from thc Pine Rid¢~ cxpcricnc6 bo¢or~ th6 Vand~rbiR Beach Road ~x~6n.sh)n ,.va~ huih fi~a[ ~h6 ~rM~c on Hickor~ Bird c~c~cd~d ~0,000 v~hi:16s per ~oin~ [o happen to 107dh and Mso ~08d~ a~ ii links up [o 10?d~ ~( 8Ih Cour[ E. ~V~ do no~ wan[ an access road whh a Ii,hi IJ~kJn~ u~ ~o any av~nu~ h~ ~apl~s Park. a signaled intersection ~ 107Ih Av~nu~ is ¢or6~d upon us, [h~ w~ ask lha[ you include, Mon8 with d~c Barron Collier plan. a rCsoludo~ [o c[os~ 107d~ a~d i08[h ~h¢ commcrciM section, ¢orr~ a hors~sh~ around 8Ih Coun E. Th~ wouM b6 Ibc chcapcs~ ~nd simpl6st sotu[io~ to wha[ w~ll b~ a major problem. ~¢ you do ~o[ closin~ these (wo ~vcnuc~ th~n thc next Uc~ solution ~s to h~v~ l~¢t [u~n dir~ctionM lan~so~t~ imothc shoppinsc~ntcr fromUS4t. ~aplcs Parkd6scrvc~Ucttcr than bcin~ d6s~roy~d by hu¢~ dcvclopmcms ~cros~ d~¢ highway. 1 2B2n I)alc ~\/ iI i~ B,)ard of County ColnmJssi,mers 330l Tamiami 'Frail East Naples. Fh)rida .34112 l.'Wc ~L~J~.~}:,~ _ arc most cm'cerncd about the plans to linc up I07th Avenue N~)rlh widt the Iarge new shopping center on In~okalce Road and US 4l. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired soutbero bounda~ road in the pr~ect linking up with 107th will make matters worse. Wc k~ow from thc Pin~ Ridge experience beror~ thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road cxtcnst,~n was built that lac traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day, They did not bavc a major shopping cenler al thc odmr cad. So imagine what is going co happen Io I07dL ired also 108th as it links up ro 107d~ at 8tll Court E. We do not w:mt an access road with a ligbl linking up to any avenue in Naplcs Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then w¢ ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th ~nd 108th at thc end of tim commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then tim next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only inlo tim shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway Additional com~nems: 12B2 33~1I Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 [)car Commissioners. to linc up 10?th Avenue North with dtc large new s]~opping ccn~¢r on ImmokaIce Road arm US 41. This will cause I0?th ¢o b~comc a major cut-through route in~o the center. Thc desired southern bound:~ road in the project linking up with 10?~h will make maucrs worse. Wc know rrom ~ Pin~ Ridge experience bctbrc the Vanderbih Beach Road ¢x~nsion was bulk ~ha~ the ~raffic on Hicko~ BJvd exceeded 10J~0 vehicles per day. They did no{ bavc a major shopping center at thc o~hcr end. S~ imagine wit:: is going ~o happen to i07[h, and also [08th as it links up [o t07gt at 8ali Court E. Wc do not want an access mad with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107ih Avenue is forced upon us, ~en we ask that you include, along with thc Barren Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th aud 108th at ~¢ end of the commcrcial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will b¢a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is [o have Ich turn directional lanes only imo thc shopping comer from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Address T~lcphon~ number Board of County C,,)mmissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Nap,c,,, Florida 34I Dear Commissioners. I/We '~' ir" ] }.~'. c' ~ ...... - are most cu;:cerned about the plans [o tine up 107th Avenue Nor~ with the large new shopping center on hmckalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to beco~ a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project li~ing up with 107th wilI make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before ~e Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hicko~ Blvd exceeded 10,~0 vehicles per day.. They did not have a major shopping ~nter at the other end. So imagine what is ~omg to happen [o 107th, and also i08[h ~ it links up [o i07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road wi~ a light ti~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. It' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, ~en we ask ~a[ you include, along with ~e Barton Collier plan, a resolulion to close 107~ arid 108th at ~e end of · e co~ercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8~ Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing ~ese two avenues then the next b¢~ solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acr~ ~e highway. Addi[ional co--ems: Yours truly, Name(s), (Please Print) Address Telephone number 1 2S2 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 3.!I 12 Dear Commissioners. I/We · ~A o ~r~ are most ce~cerned about the plans to line up 107th ~nue North w'it~ 7~ ~ new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-throuuh route into the center. The desired southern boundary roaa m the prQect linking up w~th 107th will make matters worse. We know from tl~e Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extensioo was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to I07th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road with a light Ii.lng up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask ~at you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close i07th anti 108~ at the end of the co~ercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major prnblcm. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next b~t solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Yours truly, Signature // Name(s) '(PI~[~2 Prin'TJ-' Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3.01 Tam/ami Trail East ap cs, Florida 3411'~ Dear Commissioners, I/W~e / ~ 2: ' ' '. are most cot:corned about the plans to line ulS' I07th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on hnm.:>kalee Road and US 41. This will cause i07th to become a major cut-throuti~ route into the center. .......... c ............. , ....... . mac, ia :he proj::,:: Imk;,-,.z uF ;vi:h I07th will make ma ters worse We ' · . · know from the Pine R~dge experience betorc the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ;*,'as built that the traffic on Hickor;' Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end $o imao. qine what is going to happen to i07th, and a/so I08th as it li~z!.:s up to 107th at 8th Court We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th a,:d 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what ',','ill be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only' into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway Additional comments: Yours truly, Sig~'ture " ' ,',~.',Z~ C.',L~':!"/' - , 1' Name(s) (Pleasd Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 330l Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, [/We ~- ', , .... . are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4i. This '*'ill cause 107th to become a major cut-through rou~e into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will mike matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th ax it lid up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolmion to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next beu solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acroc, s the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, , ~"~t ,(. ..~/~. . S~gnamre Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number ,.. Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line up I07th Avenue North with the ~arge new shopping center on Imrnokalee Road and US 41. This wiI[ cause 107th to become a major cu~-throueh route into thc center. Ti~e desired ~outhcrn boundary mad in thc project linking up w~ti~ 107eh will mak¢ manors worse. Wc know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbik Beach Road extension was bulk {hat the ~raffic on Hickory' B[vd exceeded 10,000 vehicks per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is We do not want an access road with a lighl linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at I07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108~h at the end of the co~ercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not apprc~':e closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by hu~e developments across the highway. Additional comments: ~P~ 5 ~,~/~ S~ ~ ~,~ Your~ 5ignalur~ Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami ]'rail East Nap[cs, Florida 34II2 Dear Commissioners, I/We ."?j~ (Z~- (~ / ) '' ... cq X' are most cnncerned about the plans to linc up 107th Avenue Nor~ with thc large new shopping comer on Immokalec Road and US 41. This wilI cause 107th to become a major cu~-throu~h route ir, to the center. The desired southern bounda~ road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience heR;re the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that ff~e traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,~ vehicles per day. They did not havc a majnr shopping center at thc othcr end. So imagine what is going to happen ~o I07th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along wi~ the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107fl~ and i08~ at the end of the co~ercial section, fo~ng a horsesh~ around 8~ Cou~ E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then ~e next best soIution is to have left n~rn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better th~n being destroyed by huge dcvelopmems across thc highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Prin0 Address 1 2B2 Date: / [3oard of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34[12 Dear Commissioners. to line up-107th Avenue Non~ with the large new shopping center on Inmaokalce Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundap/ road in the proiect Iinkine uo with 107th will make ma ers worse We know from the Pine R~dge experience b~fore the Vanderbflt Beach Road extension was built that the £raffic on Hickory BIvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center a(the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end or' the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left rum directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name~) (Pl~a-sePfint)¢ A~ Address T~icphone number Imppen tu IOUlh. and :dso i (,':qh :~s Jr Ih~k~ LLD to i071h al 31l~ C,;,ur[ i7:. a[ong xx [th lbo I~arron Collier pkm. a resultOion to ch)se I07th and lOb;th aI die crud of lJle these txxt) axcnues then the next best solution is tO have lel$ runt directionM bnes onh' the shopping center fi'om [.'S 41 Naples Park deserve~ belier than beh~2 destroyed Ilu~c dexelopmcnts across Ihe JlJ~JlXX;I), ' fdept on~ numb -r - ~-~ Date: '{ /7'. / Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34I I2 Dear C,)mnfissioners. l/We / ,, /I , Z" {3,.-2.~ ;~ f'/;/.~-~ ,~; ,--TM~,l ~- are most concerned about the plans to line up 10?th ,,~ve-ntle North wkh the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and tls 41. This wiII cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse, We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on t~ickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at tile other end. So imatzine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to i07th at 8th Cou~t E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the corrm~ercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into tile shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across tile highway. ,Additional comments: 'fours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Print) 'A~&ess ' Telephone number Board of Count?' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to uae upJ07th Avend'~North with the large new shopping center on Inm~okalee Road and US 4i. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-throuo, h route into the cenler. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up wTth 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the ~raffic on Hickorv Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The.,,' did not have a major shopping center a~ the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also I08th as it links up to I07th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light lint:ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th m:d 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Board of Courtly Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We t '\~'". ' ':~ ~( ./'. are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the lara~ new sboppim~ CCh,er on lmmokalec Road and US 41. This will cause 107th ~o beco~e a major cut-t~rou~h roule inlo the center. Thc dc~i~-cd southern bour~da:y ~t)ad [r~ thc proj¢ct linking up w[tb 107th will make mat~ers worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience betbre the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the lraffic on ~ickorv Blvd exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not bare a major sbopping center a(~he off,er end. So imagine wba~ is ?big ~o happen to 107th. and also 10Sth as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not wnnt an access road with a light linking up :o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107ih Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask ~hat you incl,~de. along with ~h¢ garron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be tile cheapest and simplest solution ~o what will be a major problem. If you do not appro~'e closing these two avenues then ~e next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only in~o the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Yours truly, Signa!ure Board of County Cornmissioncrs 330l Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida .34!I2 Dear Comrniss[oncrs. to line up ]07th Avenue No~ with the large new shopping cer~tcr on I~okalee Road and US 4I. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern bounda~ road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from ~e Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that ~e traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per ~Jay. They did not have a major shopping center a[tbe other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107all, and also 108th as it li~s up to 107th at 8~ Cou~ E. We do not want an access road widt a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, t~en we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the co~ercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve dosing these two avenues then the next best so[ufion is to ha',c left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Signature Address Tc[cphone number 9oard of County Commissiooers 3301 Tanliami Trail East Naples. Florida 34II2 Dear Commissioners. I/We. t.~ \_~,7~__~/~.-i/'/ arc most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Irnmokalee Road and US 4i. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary, road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse, We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension 'was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day They did not have a major shopping center at thc olher end. So imagine what is going tu happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close i07th and i08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, 5-- / .-,--- , Name(s) (Please print.,! ~.,- a ~ , [ Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 330I Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissk)ners. I/~We I,.,;. , '~ , ,;; i ,/:i;i g ;:, i.,',_ are most c~mcerned about the plans to hne up 107th Avenue North wit~ the large new shopping center on [mmokalee Road and US 4i. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4~ough route into the cenmr. The oes'reu sou hem boundary road in the project linking up wid~ 107th will mhke matters worse, We know from the Pine Ridge experieme before ~he Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on flickory Bird exceeded 10, )~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping Center at thc other end. So imagine what going to happen to 107all and also 108th as it links up tn I07th at We do not want an access road with a light linking up m any avenue in NapDs Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the garron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th a:,d 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8~ Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments ~ 'TY'~ vt._~.~--, f~ ~c".~ ~'.[ ~c_ ~ - Yours truly, - - - ~ ) ,o~. ~ 5x~... Signature ;I, Na~c(~i (Please~fint) Address Telephone number f3oard of Coun£y Commissioners /? 3301 Tamiami Trail East h'aples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, / ~ , , . ,-- .~ ' ' cerneu about thc plans lo li[l~ up 107[h Avenue ~'or[h wid~ thc large new shoppine center on lmmoka]ee Road and US4I. This',vi~lcause 1OT[h [~)becomea majorcu[-d~roueh routg in[o[hec~nter. The desired sou[hem boundary road in the project linking up w~[h ]07d1 will make mailers worse. We know from [he Pine Ridge experience bel})re the Vanderbil[ Beach Ro~d extension was built [h~[ the traffic on ~ickory Bird exceeded 10.~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is ~oin~ [O happen [o 107[h, and also 10gib as it links up [o 107[h at 8th Court W~ do not wan[ an ~ccess road wilh aligh[ li~ing up [o any avenue in a signaled intersection at 107[h Avenue is forced upon us. [~]en we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution [o close ]07[h and 108[h [hccommcrciaiscc[ion. formin~ a horseshoe~round 8lhCourtE. This wouldbethe cheapest and simpJes[ solution to wha[ will be: major problem. [[ you do not ~pprove closing these two ~venu~s [hen the next best solution is [o have left ~rn directional lanes only into [he shopping center from gS 41. N~ples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developmems across the highway. Additional comments: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tarniami Trail East Naples, Floddl 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desized southern boundary road in the project linking up with 10'7th will make maners worse. We k~ow from the Pine Pddge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ss'as built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per da),. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. ,,~ We~do not want an access road with a Ii~t linking up to any avenue in Naples Park, Ifa signaled intersection at ~?th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Ban'on Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and ]Ogth at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Cour~ E. Tkis would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these .a'o avenues then the hex1' best solution is 1o have left ~ura directional lanes only the shopping center from US 4i. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the Nghway. Additionaleomments: ! {~,_~ffIO'Y' ~ ~ ~ Yours ~ruly, 8/I- T~l~phone number TOTAL P.O1 7 Board of County Commissioners 330I Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners, [IVee . r ' z-,':.: ,'" .... '- ' ': /: '-'/':.' are most L,ncerned about the plans to line up I07th Avenue North with the larg~ new shopping center on [mmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory. Blvd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also t08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. if a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Ban'on Collier plan, a resolmion to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve dosing these two avenues then the next bes~ solution is to have left rum directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) ,~?'f-'~ Address Telephone number 1 2B2 Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34I I2 Dear Commissioners~ [/We -,'~: ~-~,~c:e<~ are most c,qcerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with .t07th will mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickor7 Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going rd happen to I07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any aYenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at [07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commerciaI section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left ~rn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Floridu 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ./;, ~r-Og;/~. ~%f ~,~ are most concerned about thc plans to line up 107tt~ Avenue No~h with dm large new shopping cc:~er on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 1071h ro become a major cut-through route into the center. The d~sircd s,~uthern h,~lHqd:l~ fond in the pro?-~ Iip~:ing ,jp with Ig7*h will make matters worse. Weknow from dm Pine Ridge expericncc bei~re the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was huih that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th CoUrt E. We do not want an access road wkh a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with thc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Cou~ E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then IBc next best solution ~s to have left mrn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better thaB being destroyed by huge developments across the high,.vay. Additional comments: ~ /~5'.C5.~/~>~ ~c.c.~m,~ ,~ ~4 Signature ~/// ~ - ' Name(s) (Please Prino Address Tdephone number Dale: i~-q-cl%' Board of Count.v Conm:issi{mcrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners. I/We ~F, }~O~VO,~ arc most co,'ccrncd aN>ut the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with I07th will make matters worse. We know lrom tt~c Pine Ridge expcricucc before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on llickory Blvd exceeded I0.000 vehicles per day. They did not havea major shopping center ;it thc othcr end. So imagine whai is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107tl~ at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107Ih Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th ap..I 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only iuto the shopping cemer from US 41. Nap[cs Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Date: BOaFd of County Commissioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. ~ [ ~u'C,5'-: ~)O~C~ are most c 'acerned about the plans to line up I07th Avenue North with the la~ge new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4I. This will cause 107th to become a ~jor cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the projem linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge ex~rience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hicko~ Bird exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th. and also 108th as it li~s up to I07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution m close i07th 2~d 108th at the end of the co~ercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a majer problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solmion is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additionalcomments: ~ (x~sT/:-0~- ~Fp/'< ~ Too9 Name(s) (please Prim) 5'5 7_. 2~ f ,D~~ q Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. tn line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary, road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that [he traffic on Hickory B[vd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going [o happen to 107th. and als() 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Cour~ g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then w: ask that you include, along with thc Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Addre.~ Telephone number 1 2B2,1 Date: Board of County Commissioncr~ 3301 Tamiami 'frail East N · ~ aplcs, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, [/We -. ;2.~-;2 ~i ,,. :'-~. ~ - are most concerned about the plans to linc up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalcc Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to becomt a major cut-through route into thc center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m~ke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. The7 did not have a major shopping Center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then '.v; ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Cour~ E, This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~t solution is to have left turn directionaI lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acroe,,s the highway. AdditionaI comments: Yours t~Iy,.~/ ~/ ', Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address - "Ye; ' ' Telephone numar Board of County Cnmmissioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4i. This will cause 107th to become a major cuHbrough route into the center. The desired southern beuadar7 mad in thc project lit&lng up with 107th will m~akc matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bh, d exceeded 10,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the o~hcr end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th al 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107~ and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues ~hen the next best solution is [o have left turn directionaI lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments. Name/s) Address Telephone number Date: ~' " Board of County Commissioners 330i Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 341 i2 Dear Commissioners, 10 line 6Trl'071h Avenue North with tile large new shopping cemer on Immokalee Road and US 4I. This will cause i07th to become a major cuHhrough route into the center. The desired southern boundary ~oad in 'h~ pr.~ect lh~;ina up with 107dl will ~ -~ mat~ers worse, kc kno~ from the Proc Rldae experience before the Vanderbih Road extension was built that the traffic on ~ ~eac 1 ickorv Bird exceeded 10,~0 vehic,es per day They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to I07rh at 8d~ Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107dj and 108th al the end of the CO~ercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Signa~ .. / · ~ - Nameis) (Piece Prim~ Telephone number Board of Counly Comnlissh)acrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East N;kPlcs. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. .,- lost concerned about tile aris to Im~up 10/th ~enue North ~/h the large new shopping center on hnmok: ce Road and U541. Tbis~:illcause 10~h to become a major cut4hroueh route into th~ center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up w}th 107th will make maaers worse. We know from the Pine Ridae experience bct'ore the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was buih that thc traffic on I~ickorv Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not bave a major shopping cenrer a[ the other end. So imaaine what is going [o happen to 107[h. and also 10Sth as it links up ro 107th at 8[h Co~rt E. We do not want an access road xvitla a light linking up to anv avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imcrscction at 1070~ Avenue is {brood upon us. [{lea ~2 ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to closc 107th and 108th at'the end of the commercial section. I~rming a horseshoe around 8th Court g. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these [wo avenues then [tie next best solmion is ro havo kix turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed hy huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, /// / ~ ( " "z '-:'- /." ,'/" , f'~." · ¥. ,.,//.'-. .. ,. ....7: Addre~ Telephone numar Board of Count).' Cormnissioners 330l Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. '"""e ~p/~4--T~'4'x'¢--~ ,. are most c.'.~cerned about the plans to line 107th Avenue Nor-th with the lar~ new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-th, rough route into the center. The desired southern boundary, road in the Froject linking up with 107th will mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on l::/ickorv Blvd exceeded t0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center a~ the other end. So imagine what is going [o happen ~o 107th, and also 108th a.s it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolmion to close t07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. ThJs would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mm directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additiorml comments: You?)ruly, Name(s) (Please Pf~t) Address U~L , Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line up 107th Avenue North with the large n'e'w shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road irt the project ill,king up widl i07d~ wiii nmkc matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the con'wnerciaI section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners .3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 341 I2 Dear Commissioners, are most concerned about the plans to line up i07th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41, This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired seuth:rn boundary road tn thc projc:zt lit, king up with 107th will matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ,,vas built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded i0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping centcr at the mhcr end. So imagine what is going tu happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107ih al 8th Cour! E. We do nt)t want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park, Il' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, thc;~ we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: N , amens) ~lease Address Telephone number B~ard .f Cou.ty 3301 Tamiami Trail l:.ast Naples. Florida 34112 Dear C~__~mJssioncrs. . , new shopping cclllcr on hnm,~kalce Road and U54I. Tiffs willcausc 107[htobecomea n~aj~)rcur-rl]rou~h route into thc center. Thc desired southern boundary rr,ad in Ibc project linking up w~rh 107[h will make matters worse. Wc know from tl]c Pine Ridge experience before Ibc Vandcrbilt Beach Road cxmnsion was built d]at Ibc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0.0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not w:mt an access road with a light linking up ir) any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is ~'orccd UFO. us, then wc ask that you include, along wifl~ thc B,rmn Collier phm. a resolution m close i07th and 108fl~ at the end o[' thc commercialsccrion, forminga horseshoe around 8[hCourt E, This would berhc cheapest and simplest solution ~o what will be a maj.r problem, If you do not approve closing these two avenues then Ibc next best solution is to have left ~urn directional hines only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: truly, , ... . ' Name(s~ (Please Prinl) .... ' Address t - '.~ ,/ Telephone nurn~.r I)alc: /'/ . ?..v,'- B~xlrd of C~unty Naples. [:!l~rid:l 34112 l)c;tr Commissi~mcrs. /We ' -/ ' ' ,' . ~. .',- ,' ~ r : .~ , ~ ,~c most concerned about thc plans to linc up 107th Avenue North with tl]c~bm new shopping center on Immokalcc Road nd ]S4 This. willcausc. 107lhlo~comca n]a'orj cut-throu~[_ ro cintotbcccntcr.. Thc desired s~)uthcrn boundary ~txid (n'tlm project linking up with 107th will make matters worse Wckn¢~wi'rmnthc PincRidgccxpcricnccbcforclJ~cVandcrbih Beach R()ad extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.0~) vehicles per day. Thcydid nm havca n:~jt~rshoppingccmcr;trlhcothercnd. Su imagine what is goiug to h;~ppcn to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to I07th at 8th Court E. Wc do not want an access road with a light linking up to any xvcnue in Naples Park, If a signaled intersection :~t 10711~ /~vcnuc is fi)reed upon us. then v,c ask that you [ncluclc. ;dong with thc Barton Collier pi;m, a resolution [o ch)sc I07lh and !08th ar'thc end of thc commcrci;il 'cotton. fi>truing a horseshoe around 8th Gout[ [. This would Dc thc cheapest and simplest solution to whz~t will be a ma~or problem. I1' you do nor approve closing these two avenues d]cn Ibc next best solution is [o have lcJ't turn directional hmcs only into thc shopping ccmcr From US41. Nap/cs Parkdcscrvcsbctrcr than being destroyed by huge dcvch)pmcn[s across Ibc highway. Additional commcms: Yours truly. / Name(s) (Plcnsc Prim) Address TelephOne numb~ Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Easl Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commi%k)ncrs. .. , · / t / l/We ~_.~/~., t .,_ ,' , .~ ,. :~2 e' ~ arc mos~ concerned ~bou~ ~hc plans [o hne ~p lO?Ih Avenue North will~ d]c,'large nc',v~ooo ne center on Immoka ~c Ro~d Thc desired southern boundaQ, road in [l~c proicc[ ]Jnkin~ up wi[l~ iO?lh will make maucrs worse. Wc know from die Pine Ridge experience befor~ Iht V~nderbiI[ Beach Ro~d ex~cnsk)n w;~s built d:a[ [l;c ur;il'tic on itickor), Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per d~y. 'I'hcF did not have a major shopping center a[ thc other end. So imagine what is goin$ to happen [o 107[h. ~nd also 108th as it links up [o ]07th at 8Ih Court E. Wc do not warn an access ro~d with a light Iinkin~ up [o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107[h Avenue is forced upon us. [l]c;~ we ask [hat you include. along with thc Barron Collier plan, ~ resolution [o close 10?th and 108Ih at the end of tile commercial section, lbrmJng a horsesh~ around 8th Cour~ E. This would bc cheapest and simplest solution (o wha[ will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two :wcnucs then fl~c ncx( bcs[ solution is [o h:ivc [cfi [UF[I directional hmcs only into thc shoppin~ comer I'rom US 4I. Naples Park deserves bc~cr bcin~ desto)xed by hu~c dcvclopmems across tl~c highway. Additional commcms: B(lard of County Cot!ulliSSiOi/crs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34[12 Dear Commissioners., l/We , .2¢.z..-~ .... arc most cm~ccrncd ab,~ut thc plans to line up 107t[~ Avenue Nm'th wid~ thc large new shopping center oo hnmokalce Road and US41. This willcausc 107[l~tobccomcamajorcut-dwough route imo the center. The desired southern boundary road in thc project linking up with 107th will make mattersworsc. Weknow from thc Pine Ridge experience bcfi)rc the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 velficlcs per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107all and also 108th as it [inks up ro 107th at 8d~ Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107tl~ Avenue is fi)reed upon us, then 'we ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and I08th at the end of thc commercial section, fl)truing a horseshoe around 8tl~ Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solulion to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues [l~cn thc next best solution is lo have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcvclopmcms across the highway. Additional commems: Yours truly, ×~5' ~ .~.' Tele · p.~ e number B~)ard of County Co~nmisxioncrs .3301 Tamianfi 1'rail East Naples. Florida 341[2 Dear Commissioners. IIXVc 0~_ t~ ~ arc m~st c,mccrncd abou[ thc plans [o linc up 107d~ Avenue ~orfl~ whh thc large new shoppm~ center on hnmokalce Road and US 41, This will cause [O7th to become a major cut-thru'ouch route into the center. The desired soufl]ern boundary road in the project linking up wSth 107dj wi!l make matters worse. We know t'mm thc Pine Ridee experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road cxlcnsion was built that [be traffic on l}ickorv Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did nor have a major shopping center a([he od]er end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up ro ]07th at 8[h Court E. We do not want an access road with n light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107ih Avenue is forced upon us, [l~en we ask that vou include, along with the Barton Collier phm, a resolution to close 107th and 10gib at'the end of the commercial section, tbrming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is [o have left [urn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better dmn being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: I - ' A', S ig ~'am.re'"' ' Name(s) (Please Prinu ¢ Address / Telephone number / 1 Date: Board o'Cot nty Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ~ L: 93.~ Cx._~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The rl~,~;r ct ~ .... ' .... e~ sc_th .... bgundap,' . , .... ptUjCkt litl~tll~ Up with IUitll will make mauers worse. We know from tI~c Pine Ridge experience belbre the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that ~he traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the oacr end. So imagine what is going to happen [o 107th, and aisc 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up [o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (PlEase Print) Address Tdephonc number Board of Count.,,' Commissioners 330t Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 341 l'" Dear Commissioners. to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired .,,uuthcir~ buutMary road itl the project linking up widt i07th will mhke matters worse. We knox,,' from the Pine Ridae experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension ,.vas built that the traffic on }}ickorv Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at tile other end. So imauinc what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Cou~rt E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. ti~en '..ye ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, fi)truing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simp[est solution to what will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these two avenues then tile next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Additional comments: Name(s) (Please Print) MICHAEL F. GATZ Address Naples FL 34108 Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Napks. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to line up 107th Avenue Nord~ with tim large new shopping center on hnmokalce Road and US41. This wilIcausc 107tl~tobccomeamajorcut-flwoughroutcintothecemcr. The desired sonthern boundary road in dm prajecr linking up with 107~b will make maucrs worse. We ~ow from thc Pine Ridge experience beR>rc thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. Thcydid not have a major shopping center at the otbcr end. So imagine what is going m happen to 107th. and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a Iight linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled inmrsection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then wc ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan, a resolution to dose 107th and [08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US41. Naples Park deservesbcuer than being destroyed by huge developments across thc higbwa)'. Additional commcnu: Yours truly Name(s) (Please Pr n ) Address Te{ephone number 1 i3ourd of County Conlnlissioncrs ]30l Tanliafni Trail East NapJcs. Florida 34112 Dour Commissioners, il,kc_" ~/~,/ ~(,~rr/-/~~ ~ ~ arc most concerned about thc plans to line up i07th Avcfiuc North with thc large new shopping cenmr on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into fl~c center. Ibc desired southern boundary road m thc project hnking up with 107~h will make matters worse. We know from the Pine ~gc experience bc/brc thc Vandcrbih Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a m~0or shopping center at thc other end. So imagine wbut is going to happen to 107dL and also 108th as it links up u) 107th at 8th Court g. We do not wunt an access road with a light linking up to any a,'ctmc in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107fl~ Avenue is forced upon us. then ~e ask tbat you include. along with the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horscs~ around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next ~st solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Sign'~lyre ~ Namei~s) (Please Print) Address , Telephone number 12B2 i Date: Board of County Cmnmissim~er':, 3301 Tamhuni Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, l/We , ~o. ,~ e.p M ~ ~/o ,' arc most concerned about the plans tn lint: up 107th Avenue North with thc large new shopping center on lmmokalce Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through mute into the center. Thc desired snuthcrn boundary road in the pr,)ject linking up with 107d~ will make matters worse. Weknow from thc Pinc Ridge exlm-riencc before thc VandcrbihBeach Road extension was built tl~at thc traffic on Hicko~ Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did m)t havca major shopping center al the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108tl~ as it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end oC the commercial section, forming a horseshoe arou~ 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a ~jor problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues II~en the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across die highway. Additional commcnu: Y o u r s ~r.u-b'7~ /'~ .~ ..-, m Signature / Na~e(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissimters 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We 2/.:',.~: ,,... :~z _ ~ .: ...-~. are most concerned about the plans to hne up 107th Avenue North w~tB the large new shopping center on !mmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07th to become a major cut-through route into the center, The desired southern bounda~ road in the project linking up with 107th will m~ke mattcrs worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built d~at lhe traffic on Hickory Blvd cxcccdcd I0.000 vehicles per day. Tbcydid not havea majnr shopping ccntcr at thc othcr end. So imagine what is going to happen to i07th, and also 108th ~ it links up to I07~h at 8th Coum g. We do not want an access road with a light Iinking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Napies Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Signamre / Name(s) (PleasePrintl . ,. /,: Address Telephone number i Board o[' Oounly C(>mmissi(mers 3301 Tamianti Trail East Naples. Florida 3,1.1 I2 l)car Commissioners. /We ' ' ' :"' "' ' ': ' to linc up 1071h Avcl)uc Nm'th widl'lhc large new sh~)pping center on hnmokalee Road and US 4l. This will cause [07Ih lo bccnille a major ctil-lhrotl~h route into lbo center. Thc desired soulhcrn boundary road in thc project linking up wSth 107[ll will make maucrs worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience bcf()rc Ibc Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was i0uilt fi]at Ibc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at fl~c other end. So imagine what going [o happcr~ ~o 107th. and also ]08th as it links up [o 107dr at 8th CourJ E. We do not want an access fond with a light linking up to any avenue in Nnplcs Park. If a signaled intersection at 107tl~ Avenue is forced upon us. then wo ask that you include. along with thc Barton Collier phul. a resolution to ch)sc 107th and 108th at thc end the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8Ih Courl E. This would be rite chcapestand simplest solution to what will he a major prohlcm, lf you do not approvc ch)sing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional hmcs only into thc shopping ccmcr from US41. Napics l>arkdcscr~cs better being destroyed by huge dcvclopmems across thc highway. Additional comments: Board of Cotlllty ConlnlisSioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Easl Naples, Florida 34112 I)uar Commissioners, l/We k,t~(?.~:.~ t . . .*. . ~t,, ~t .;,_'. ,~ .7: are most cc,~ccrncd about the plans to linc up 10Vth Avenue North with thc large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 4t. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern bounda~ road m thc projcc~ linking up with 10?th will make maucrs ~vorse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built thai ~he ~raffic on Hickory Bird exceeded i0.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up ~o 107~ at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along wid~ the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close I07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, lbrming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solulion to wha~ will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these two avenues thru the next best solution is [o have left turn directional lanes only imo the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Signature t' ~ ~ Namcq s) Please Print) ~ ., . - ~ c:. Address Telephone number ' ' ' ~'} k.'C.~ ~ Btmrd of County Commissiorlcrs 330i Tamiami 'Frail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ,f? Y '~,~'v ~_ are most concerned about the plans ta line up 107th Avenue Nodth with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US4!. This will cause 107thtobccomeamajorcut4hroughroute into theccnter. ..................... "~,; .... _ with !07th wi!! make Th,. dcsirzd ,', u ~' .~, boundary ~,,'.,~ ;,, '}'e r.%-J linkhm up matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going m happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along with thc Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would bc thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional commems: Yours trulv, Sienature Name(s~ (Pfease Print) Address Telephone number :. 12B2 L);tte: ,~ -; I B,)ard of County Comntissi,)ners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 I/We are most concerned about the plans t,3 line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping cemer on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07th to become a ma.jot cut-through route into the center. The desired s¢mthern boundary r~md in the project linkin~ up with 107th will make matters worse. Xk'e know tYom Ibc Pine Ridge experience bclk~re the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on liickorv Bird exceeded I0.0~ vehicles ~r day. They did not have a major shopping center at tbe o{her end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us. then x,e ask that you include. ahmg with the Barton Collier pIan. a resolution to ch)sc 107th and 108th at the end of ll~e commercial section, tbrming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from LIS 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comn~ems: Yours truly. Si2namre Name(s) (Please Print) TeI~hone number 1 2B2 Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami ]'rail East Naples. Florida 34112 [.)ear Commissioners. I,'Wc . L ~ / ,....~.> z / ~ , , ~ are mos[ concerned ahout tile phms to line up 107tl~ Avenue North with the la/ge ne~opping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the zenter. lhe desired southern boundao, road in the project linkmg up w~th 107th will mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before tt~e Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built thai thc traffic on Iiickory BNd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. Thcydid not have a major shopping center at thc other end, So imauine what is going to happen to 107all and also I08d~ as it links up to 107d~ at 8th Co~t E, We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, tl~en ,va ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to dose 107th and 108th at the end off thc commercial sec0on, forming a horseshoe around 8ih Coua E. This would be II~e cheapest and simplest solution to what wi[l bc a major problem. If vou do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left ~urn directional lanes only into the shopping comer from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than boing destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, N~(~.) (P ease Print) . Address . Telephone number Board of Couuty Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34i 12 Dear Commissioucrs, ~_~ ~ ,r,. ~ ~ ../[~Sz . arc most co ~ccrncr~ a~out thc alans ohaeup 07th Avcnug~orlh w~th thc large new shopping center on lmmokalcc ~ad and US 4i. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4hrou~h route into thc center. Thc desired southern boundary road in thc projcct linking up w~'th 1OTth wilI make matters worse. Wcknow from~hc Pine Ridgccxpcricncchcfl)rethc VanderbiltBeach Road cxlension was built that thc traffic on/lickory Bird exceeded 10,C~0 vehicles per day. They did nol have a major shopping center at the other cad, Soirn:~fline whatis going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th ar 8th Cot~t E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include. along w/th the Barton Collier plan. a resolution to ch)se 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horses~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve ch)sing lhesc two avenues then thc ocxt best solution is to have loft turn directional lancs only into the shopping ccntcr from US41. Naples Parkdescrveshctlcrthan being destroyed b7 huge dcvclopmcn{s across the highway. Additional comments: Yours tr, uJy. Namets) (~e~se Print) Address Telephone number 3301 T,Inli;mfi Trail Naples. FI.rkl;i 3,1112 to linc up 107Ih Avenue N~,r~h with Iht large new ~J~oppimz ccn~cr ~>n Imnx~k;tlec Road and US 41. '[his will c;msc 107th lo hccomc a nxljor cut-t~rough r.mc into li~c center, Thc dcsircd southern bmmdar7 ro,d in die project linking up with 107Ih will rBllke maltcrsworsc, Wcknow fromlhcl'JncR[dgccxpcricncc hcfi~rcthc V;mdcrbill Beach Road cxlcnsion was built lhiH thc lraffic ~m Hickory Bird cxcccdcd 10.000 vchiclcs per day. They did not have a major shopping ccnlcr a[ Ibc ofl~cr end. 5¢) hna~inc what Wc do not w;mt ;m access r(md wilh a lighl Ihlking up m ;my avenue in Naples Park. If ;~ signaled Jn[crsccl~.n al 107th Avenue is Ibrccd tJp.n u~. limn v.c ask lh;~t y.u include, al(rog with die Barton Collier phmn. a resolution m close 107dl ;md 108Ih ;il Iht end {t~c comnmrci;d section. [brining a horseshoe around 8:h Court I~. This would bc chcapcs~ and simpIcsl ~nlu~ion lo whal will bca majo~ problem. If you do nol approve closing these Iwo avenues Ihcn thc next bcsl solu[ion is to have Ict'[ turn directional hines only into thc shr)pping ccnlcr from IlS 41. N;~plcs [';~rk dc~crvcs boiler limn being dcslroycd hy huge dcvclopmcnls across thc Add)imml cmnmcnts: Yours truly. Name(s) IPlcasc Print) Address .... Tclcphonc numar Naples. Florid;i 34112 Dc;ir hWc~.,:,L.. ,.,. ;~ - .~,:/. /. . . . ......... = .... ~_ x.: ....... arc m{)st omccrncd ahou[ thc phms lo linc up lOTlh Avcrmc Nar'Ih with ibc large new sh~,ppinj center and [JS 4I. This will cause 107lh h) hcc{>mc ;t m;tfi~r cut-through fault inll) Ibc ccnlcr. Thc desired s~>ud~,z,n b(>undrtry r<~d in thc project linkin~ tm with I07th will make m;mcrs worse. Wc kn(~w from thc Pine Ridge cxpcrienc'~ h'cforc thc Vandcrbih Bc;~ch R,;ad cxrcnsian was huih tha~ Ibc ~raffic on Ilickorv l/Ivd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did m~t have a m~uar shopping center going to happen to 107th, and als(~ 108th as it links up We do nrx w~ml ~m access r~):~d will~ a a signaled intcrsccti~m at 107d~ Avenue is fi)reed upon us. then ~,c ask that you include, ;dong with thc [3arran Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th ami 108dj at thc end of thc commercial section, fi>truing a horsesh~ around 8~h Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a maj~r problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next [>est s(flutian is to have left turn dircctionaI lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcvclopmcms across dm highway. Addit/anal comments: $igtxuure " ,, Nam~($~ (PI~ Prim) Address T61cphon¢ number Board of County Commisskmcrs 3301 Tamiarni Trail East Naples. Florida 34I 12 Dear Commissioners. l/We CO ,91 f-: ~l' c, L- ~- S ~Q are most concerned about the plans to line up 10?th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-tl~'ough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up wi~h 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any aveoue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have Ieft turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Telephone numar Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Corelli -; t) erq ~ afc nlos[ concerned about the plans m line up I07th Avenue North wi~h',,d~e large new shopping cen~cr on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th td become a major cubd~rougb route into tae c~ntcr. The desired southern boundary road in the project linkin~ up wifi] 107~h will make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience bet~)re thc Vanderbil[ }3each Road extension was built that thc traffic on [~ickorv Bird exceeded 0,000 vehicles per day. They did not havca major shopping center at the o[bcr end. Snimaginewbatis going ~o happen to 107th. and alsn 108[h as ir links up to 107th ar 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in N~p~es Park. If a signaled intersection at i07tb Avenue is forced upon us. then x,'e ask that w)u include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution ~o close 107[h and 108~h at the end of the commercial section, t~rming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simples[ solution to what will be a major problem. Ir'you do not approve closing these two avenues dion the next best solution is ~o have Ich [uru directional lanes only into thcshoppMgccn~er from US41. Naples Park descrves better than being destroyed by bu~c developments across [be highway. Additional comments: Ygm's truly, · , ,..~' '.~ :,.. , .. ,, Name(s) ([)lease Print) AdtTress Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. ~.?We ~2 ~ ~Z~)~Z ~/GD are most concerned about the plans lo line up 107th Avenue N(~rtb with Iht large~ew shopping center on hnmokalee Road ~md US41. This will cause 107~hlobecomea major cut-d]roud~ route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up w]lh 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center a( Ibc off,er end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107ill and also 108Ih as it links up ~o I07lh at 8th Court g. We do not warn an access road wi~h a light linking up to any avcmic in Naples Par~. If a signaled intersection at 107~h Avcuue is fi)reed upon us. lhen we ask that you include. along with ~he Barton Collier plan. a resolution ~o c]o:;e 107~h and 108th at the end of the commercial section. /brining a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to bare left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being desto)yeti by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Signam~re Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone nilmbcr Date:" ' ' Board of Couaty Commissinncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail Fast Naples. Florida 34I 12 Dear C)m nissi mers. l/We . '.,i, ~. :% , ·~':"'~.,: .::. ..... ~ are most concerned about tbc plans to line up 107th Avenu~North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cra-through route into the center, matters x, ~orse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbil[ Beach Road extension was buih that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did notbaveamajor shopping center at the other end. So imagine what going [*) happen to 107th, and also i08th as it links up to 107th ar 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light Iinking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collicr phm, a resoIution to ch)se I07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, rotating a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be t:heapcst and simplest solution to what will be a major prr>hlcm. If you do not approve closing these two avenues allen the next best solution is to bare left Iurn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US4i. Naples Park deserves bcttcr than being destroyed by huge developments across ~e highway. Additional comments: _.~_~: .... ~ ~ .... /~ Yours truly. Signature Namc~s) (Please Print) - -... Address Telephone number Board of County Conlmissioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ?.,..x~.~/,, ?.c -,<,.,,_ ,'/ ,. are most concerned about tim plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route inlo the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built Iii:it life traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per da.','. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So ira:mine what is going to happen to 10701. and also 10Sth as it links up fo 107tlr at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to all)-' avenue in Naples Park. Il' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, ther, we ask that you include, along with the Barren Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and !08th at the end of 0m commerckfl section, £orming a horseshoe around 8/h Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest sohnion to what will be a major problem. If you df) not approve ch)sing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into tile shopping center from LIS 41. Naples [)ark deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. 7 -~.L~. ,, -.~-,. :,. ~gnature > Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners .3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, J/We arc most concerned abaut the plans m linc up 10?th Avenue Nortl~ with thc large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cra-through route into the cenmr. The desired southern boundary road in the project linkin~ up with 102fi~ w]lI make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicI~s per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the ogler end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up ~o 107th at 8th Court E. Wc do m)t want an access road witl~ a light linking up ~o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~h Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Cnllicr plan, a resolution to close 102th and 108th at the end of thc commercial section, lbrmin~ a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and shnplcst solution ~o what will be a major problem. [f you do not approve closing these two avenues tllcll the next best solution is to have Ich mrn directional lanes only into the shoppin~ center from US41. Naplcs Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Additional comments: Yours .truly. Signature Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telepl~one number Board of County Commissioners 3301 ramiamiTraiIEast Naples, Florida 34I I2 Dear Commissioners, . .,,' I/We l',' to,- ~-'J3e,.1.,~ -wl~,~ V', ,'~,'a: are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North'Xvkh thc large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 10?th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 10?th will make matters worse. Wc know from the Pine Ridge experience belk~re the Vanderbilt Beact~ Rnad extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, loaning a horseshoe around Sth Court E. This would be tile cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then tile next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into tile shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, ,. " , t ignature --- Name(s) (Please prt~r~) Address Telephone numar 12B2 ,i Dale: .... , (" Board of CounLv 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissim]crs. I/XV¢, I ;~' n'.,_ ~ ,.c' - ~;0 ¢~ m~st concerned aba;ut the phms tohneup I07d]Avenue North with thc large cwsh~ppingccnteron Immokalce Road and US 4l. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-throu*,h route into tim center. Tim desired somhern boundary road in tbe project linking up with 107d~ will make mailers ~ orsu. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience bcrorc tile Vandcrhilt Beach Road extension was huih day. Tbcydid nothavcamajor shopping center going to happen m 107th. and also 108d~ as it links up to 107ih al 8th Court E. We dc, nm warn an access road with a light linking up m any ;~venue in Naples Park. It' a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is l'orced upm~ us. then wu ask thai you include, along wi[h Ibc Barton Collier pkm, die zommercialsection, forminga horseshoe around 8tbCourt E. This would betbe chcapcstand simplests¢luthm mxthat,,kiIl boa majorp~,)blcm, lt'youdo not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41, Naptcs Park deserves b=ticr dian being destroyed by huge developments across tt~e highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature , Telephone number 1 Date: / o/,Z / Board of Count.',' Commissioners 330I Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, l/We ~ ~7/ ~)'~-~'.~-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.~,_z~ Acx~;~xre most concerned about the plans to lin~'p 107th Avenue North with th~ large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired somhern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m~ke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen [o 107th, and also 108th as it li~s up [o [07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park, if a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, thc:: we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will M a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best mlution is to have left turn directional lanes oNy into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcvclopments across the highway. Additional comments: ~(~ Y ~ ~.~~ ~~ Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number 1 2B2 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, 1/We ~, v~ %- ;.:2, 'q"l,. , .-- r' /\t'..(l B'~ are most o..:,cerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with tim large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4.1. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern bouodary road in the project linking up with 1OVth will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also I08th as it links up to [07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue ii forced upon us, then we ask tbat you include. along with the Barton Collier platt, a resolution to close 107th ;:r~d 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to v,,bat will be a major problem, if you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves beuer than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours cml.,,', Signature , Name(s) (Please Print) Address --~. Telephone number I Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Com:n2. oVrs. ,'-) , l/We , /\ e'-7-/' ,'~ __ / .' 7 .- most concerned about the plans to line t.~lO7th/A;enue North ~.('ith the large ne,,,,' shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-dtrough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with lO?th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the VanderbiltBeach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles pCF da.'.'. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not ,.,,'ant an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Cotlicr plan. a resolution to dr)se 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest sotution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing fllese two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center frnm US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours t Name(s) (Please Print) Tdephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ~' !iff' }~,i"~O,l are most concerned about the plans to line up 107eh Avenue North with the large new shopping center on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary, road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close I07th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway, Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (PI~ Prim) Address q~l~phon~ number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples, Florida 341[2 Dear Commissioners, I/~_~5'~/.r2?.~ f / ~ ~ ~.*_~ 2.,,q Z. ~'~ arc most co,~ncerncd about the plans to'"l~me up 107tI~ Avenue North with the large new shopping ccnt.r on Immokalee Road and US 4I. This will cause 107th to become a majer cut-through route into the center. 'lhe desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Piae Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickop,.' Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a ligla linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, ~hcn we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to dose 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. . Yours truly. Sig;~aturc ~ -3 ~y Name(s) (Please Print) &TD /o7 2q-t . Address Telephene number 1 2B2 ' Board of County Commissio~lers 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34.112 Dear Commissioners. ~e _~dZ~Z.~ ~. ~ ~~/ arc midst concerned about the plans ~'t~ line up 107th Avenue N~mh with the large new sh{~pping center on hmnokalee Road and US 4l. This will cause 107d~ to become a maj~,r cut-thrmigh route into thc center. '1 he desired soutBcrn boundary r<ld in the project linking up with 107th will make maucrs worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience beforc the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Elickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did m~tbavea major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is ?lng to happen to 107th. aud also 108th ~ it links up ~o 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a lig~ linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. d~cn we ask that you include, along with thc Barr~m Collier plan, a resolution to close 107Q~ and 108th at dm commercial section, formingai~orscsh~aroundSthCourt E. This would bcthe chcapcst and simplest solulion to what will bc a major problem. Ifyou do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~ solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments acres ~c highway. Additional comments: /~- - ,. - ' You~ Signature ~" Name(s) (Please Address Telephone number ,r:loard uF C.unlv 3]1)l Tamiami Trail F. asl Naplcx. Flurida ~4112 ,.-, '['hc dc~trc'd ~rurdlcrn bmurld;trv r,~ad in thc project linkin~ up ~hh 107ih wJlJ make mallcr~ w.r-~<. V,'c kn,,'~ I'r.m thc I'inc Ridge experience bc~orc Iix: Vanderbill Beach ?i.g I. happen 1o IO7lh. and als. l()81h as it links up J. If/71h ;ti 8Ih Co~rl E. We d, riot want an access road wilh a fight linking up lu any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled imcrsccli.n at 1071h Avenue is fl~tccd up.n us, fl~cn we ask (hat you include. idang wilh Ibc lhlrror~ O,Ilicr phm. a resolutJ(m tu close 107th and 108d~ at ll~e end of hines .nly mJl~ the ~tx,ppin~ center from US 41. Naples J~ark descrvcs belle( lJlarl being dcsm~ycd by htiue dcvch~prtlcnls across Ibc highway. Addili.nal commerJls: I'.~~'' _~_~_,.~.~ H~c m~I c~mccrHcd Hhuu( The de~ircd ~mHhcrH hHuudHr?' uuld ill Iht project litlkitlg lip wilh JOTth will mHlJcr~ w(uRc We kHmv h,uH thc ]'hie Ridge c~per~eHcc hcli,rc thc VHtlde~hill He;ich I~lUld CKICll~HUl WH~ huil! Ih;Il Ibc IIHFI'ic (Ul tlick.ry Itlvd c~uccdcd ]O.O(X) vchiclcs per We du nHI WHH[ ;m HCCCS~ mhd wilh ~] lighI liHking up I. HHF HVPHUC in N~lplCs Palm I1' licillg desto,veal Iw huge dcvch,pH;cHls Hcr,~t~ Ih: highwHy Adt iii.md cummcm~' ~,,-~,~. ~ . , ~/- .: .~ ,. , ...... )- '/ix , Addte~ 33OI Tami;uni Tt:)il :,;::plc~, lqmid:: 3.1112 ;indUS 41. 'l'hi'* will cause l(}TlJl lO~Olllg 11 tllll,lOr CtH-IJll:itl['.Jl rotllC illIO thc Thc dcsircd soud~cru bmmdary road in die project linking up wifl~ 107d~ will marc matlcrs worsc, Wc know [tom thc Pinc Ridgc cxpcrJcncc Jgforc thc Vandcrbill Bcach Road cxtcnsion was built Ihal Ibc mil'fig on llickory Bird cxcccdcd l{},~X) vchJclcs per dny, Thcy dkl not havc ;I m;ijor slmpptng ccfitct al Ibc mhcr cntl, So imnginc whal is We {JO I]1~{ WiIIII all aCCCSS road wilh a ]i[lhl linking up io ]ll]~ ilVglltlg [II Nllplgs Palk, Il a signaled illlgrSggliOll ill 107th Avenue is forced uplm tls, Ihca ac ask Ih;il you include, along wJlh dig Ihrt'on ('oilier lq:m, a rcsolutkm Jo close 107ih ;md l()8d~ :il thc end Addillorla J ~ ours to linc up 107t~Avcnuc North with thc large new shopping center on Immokalcc Road ami US 41. This will catlsC 107th to become a major cut-through mule into the cenmr. The desired soufl~crn boundary road in the project linking up wifl~ 107d~ will make mailers worse, Wc kllt)w fi'om Ibc P[iIc Ridge experience hcl'(~rc thc Vandcrbih Beach Ru:M cXlCllSit)ll w;ls huih that thc traffic on Hickory Bird cxcccdcd 10,~) vehicles per day. They did not have :l ill;ljt)r shopping center 1:l Ibc other c;~d. So imagine ~vhat going to happen m 107all, ;md :l[so 10Sth as it links up h) 107Ih at 8th Court E. XVt dt~ IlOt want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park, If a signaled inmrscction at 107d~ :kvciluc is forced upon us. thct~ ,ye ask that you include, along with the Barr.n ColHcr phm. a resolution to close 107fl~ and 108th thccommcrcialscction, forming :l horscsh~< around Sth Court E. This would bcthc cheapest aod simplest solulio1/ 1o what will bca major problem. I1' you do not approve closing these two avclltles l[lcll thc next best solution is lo have !c{'t turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better being destroyed by huge dcvch)pmcnts across thc highway. Additional commcnm: Yours ~ruly, Nanjc[sJ (Please Print). ,,~ Telephone number Board of County Connnissioncrs 3301 Tamiami 'Fr;fil East ~;ip~cs. Florida 34112 I)cnr Conunissioncrs. m linc ~107th Avenue Nor(h with Jim large now shopping center on hnmokalcc Road and US 41. This will cnusc 10Vth ~o become a major cut-through route into thc cm~tcr. Thc desired southern boundary road in thc project [inking up with 10Vd~ will m'ake matters wnrsc. Wc know from thc ]~inc Ridge experience before thc Vandcrbilt Beach Road cxtcnskm wns built that 11}c traffic of 1 Hickory Bird cxcccdcd 10,000 vehicles per day. Ti~cv did no~ have a major shopping center at thc efl~cr cud. So imagine what Js ?in~ [o happen to I07~h, and also 108th as it links up to I07th at ~tJ~ Court E. Wc do not want an access road with a light linking up m any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. tim,, ,ye ask that you include. alon~ with thc Barton Collier plan, a rcsoJutlon to cIosc i0Vth and 108th at th~ end of tim commcrciaJ section, formin~ a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This wouId be thc cheapest and simplcs~ solution to what will bca major problem. If ynu do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is R) have left turn directional lancson]yintothcshoppingccntcr frnm US41. NaplcsParkdcscrvcsbcttcrlhan being destroyed by huBc developments across thc highway. Yours truly, Sig Namc~s) (Please Prim) Tcfcphonc number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause I07th to become a major cut-through route into the ceoter. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 1.07th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not ha,.'c a major shopping center at the other end. St) imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and als() I08th as it links up to I07th at 8th Ct)un E. We do not ,,,,'ant an access road with a light linking up to an.',' avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then wc ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turo directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) 'l'el~p~ne number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/~ dq y /? 7' / /~ ~ i~. i /---/:/ zv" are most concerned about thc plans to line up 107th Avenue North with tile large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road it: the project !i,%ing up '.'.'itl: !07th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that tile traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehiclcs per da,','. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light liaking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along ',,,'itl: the Barton Collicr plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court g. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature `/ ' '" Name(s) (Please Print) '7 0" / o 7 CA- /4- *'z", Address -q~'7' '?'(YT.' Telephone number Board of Cnunty Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commisskmers. I/We ~/', ,5 4 J jS~:." /~ r? ~ ,~ arcmostconcernedabouttheplans to line up 10?th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 10?th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern ~undary road in tile project linking ua wilh 10-/th will m'ake matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience before tile Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10.000 vehicles per day. They did not trove a major shopping center at tile other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then rye ask that you include, along with the Barro~ Collier plan, a resolution to close I07th and 108th at the end of the commercial sec~n, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then tile next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional commer~s: Yours truly', Signamre Name(s) (Please Prin~} Address Telephone number Date: I I-©'7 - Board o£ County Commissioners 3~01 Tamiami Tr~ Naples, Florida 341X2 Dear Commissioners, l/We ~<;~% ~O;et)[x ~0~3'C, are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue Nor[h with the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project li~ing up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then ~e ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close I07th and 108th at the end of the co~ercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) a'2 Io'0 AuE. Addrcss 3 lB-oq6 Telep8one numar J]oard ~)l' County Commissioners 3301 'l';md;md Trail L:;ts~ Naple~. Florida 34]12 J)c;tr Co[llrll~S~iO[lcr~. to linc up 107[h AV6ilUC North with thc large now shopping comer (In [imllokalcc Road aod US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-d~rough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linkin~ up with 107th will make marmrs worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience bcfUre the V~mderbih Beach Road extension was built that thc tra/'tic on ltickory Bird cxcccOcd 10,000 vchicl6s per day. They did not have ;t major shopping center at the r)thcr end. Sc~ im;~gin~ wb;,[ is going to happen re 107th. and :dso t0Sth :~s it links up to 107tl~ at Sth Court E. We do not want an access road with ~l light linking up to ;my avenue in Naples Park. I1' a signaled intersection at 107tl~ Avenue is IUrced upon us, ~hcn wc ask that you include, along with the Barren Collier plan, a resolution to ch)sc 107th and 108th at dm end of thc commercial section, fi)truing a horseshoe around 8[1~ Court E. This would bc thc cheapcst and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. II' you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center /'rom US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by hu2c dcvch)pmcnts across thc highway. Yours tm[y, Name(s) (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We c. Jon,'/v E" (/'~",,' 5 77]N( L" Z/0~5'7-a'0 are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on In'tmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary, road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension ,.vas built that the traffic on Hickory BIvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also I08th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then ¥,'e ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have let't turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. ,Additional comments: /~/~76(£ /-/.~E ~7c"-~ J=_/7~ie.L- ~. Yours truly. signat~o~ Name~s) (Please Prim) Address Dear Commissioners. I/We , ~(~ ~;'~, /'4 -_k~; ~ ~ are mos~ concerned about ~he plans to tine up 107th Avcnoc No~th wkh thc lar2c new shoppin~ ccmer on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 10?th to become a maj(~r cubtln'ough route imo tl~c center. Thc dcsircfl southern boundary load in dlc projcc~ linking up with [07th will make matters worse, We know from dm Pine Ridge experience bclbr¢ the Vanderbilt ~each Road cxmnsion was built that ~h¢ mfffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10.~0 vehicles per day. Thev did not have a major shopping center at tl~e other end. So imagim: what is going to ~appen to 107I~. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. we do no~ wanl an access mad widl a Iig~t linking up It) any avenue in Naples Park. If a sianakd interscctinn at 107~ Avenue is Ibrced upon us. fi~en we ask that you ioclude, alo~g witt~ thc Barton Collier plan, a r~soluticn to close 107d~ and 108Ib at the end of the conunercial section, forming a ~orsesl~oe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next bes~ solution is to have left turn directional lanes o~y imo the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcvclopmcms across thc hi~Nway. Additionalcommcnts: ~C~s~5 o~ Z~~~7' . Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ~ / (~,(~ fl ~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to i07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues tl~en the next best solution is to have left [urn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, //~ ~ ,~ ~.~ , :Z~,l_.ctc~/ F.d_ (~[ (Ple~e Prior) owl- OOq Telephone number 1 Date: [, Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I We /,5,.,,,-'are m,, t concerned about plans to line up 10?th Avenue North with th~ large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern boundary re,ad in the project litxking up with !07th '...'ill m~ke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hic,ko~ Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping centrr at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to I07th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the cormnercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across ~he highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, N~me(s) (Pleas~ Prim) Address Telephone number Bo;rd of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line-up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on lmmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southerr, boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbih Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per dav. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is golna to happeu to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, Forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what wild be a ~najor problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge dcveh)pments across the highway. Additionalcomments:_k ~UXL ~n /0~W b~.~, Name(s) (Please PrinO Address Tclcphonc number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Ftorida 34112 Dear Commissioners, :/~//_., ~<--// ~ ' ' '~-- '.-' ~' concerned about the plans I/We ,~77~.'--')/'~/x''' --d . /-'" ar~ most to line up 107th Avenue North with the large/new sinopping center on Immokalee Road and US 4 l. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107tb will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going tn happen to 107th, and also 108th as it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to ch)se 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only imo the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than bcin~ destroyed by huge developments across the highway. ?' ,: .._ ) )--- , ~4 arnei~lease Prim) ./ Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 3,:112 Dear Corem. ~s's~oners, /-~ .,.., ~',/~'-~//~" ( ,""-'~'] ~_.// are most concerned about the plans lt/o lwi~e up t07't//'h Av/e'~ue No'ih wit~-h' th.q/{arge new shopping center on Immokatee Road and IJS 41. This will cause 107th to/6ecome a major cut-through route into the center. The desired sc)uthern boundary road in the project linking tip with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any a'.:enue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and t08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, i ~ ~%6~ , ¢.~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue No~h with the firge new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut4hrough route into the center. The desireg southern boundary road ~n the proj~t l~ing up wi:h 107th will make ma~ters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience beIbre the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehiclcs per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other earl. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 10Sth as it links up to [07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forc~ upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barton Collicr plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th ar the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across ~e highway. Additional comm,ents,~ ~6'~ /?ki ~/7/~.(~ . Yours truly, .., ?, ,,. Signa. mr¢ Name(s) . (Pleas~ P/igt) Telephone numar Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, 'I~We ~ ~,(:-(,.. e- ~'4: · ~ '< C- ~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 10Tth Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 10?th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 10?th Avenue is forced upon us, then we. ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: S ignat't~e~ Name(s} (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Train East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Conm~issioners, /~ ?~-'; .,t~"~ll /~/~..'?b,5' ¥'~ concerned about the plans I/We ',~,V~'/~5~/I ~',~' are most to line up 107~ Aven~Nonh with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will~ause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern ~unda~ road in the project li~ing up with 107th will make matters worse. We ~ow from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a mjor shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107~h, and also I08th as it Iinks up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at ~e end of the co~ercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closine these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes ~nly into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves bctter than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yourst~lv, ~X ,-.~ ~ _ , {,. /,o'.~ ~-~ Telephone numb& 12B2, Board of Count,'.' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ,,~'-C ~'~- ~ i~ jr5} ~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with tile large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. '['he desired suud~em boundary road in the project linking up witi~ iOTth will nmke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built tha~ the traffic on Hickory Btvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at ~he other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107Ih, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be tile cheapest and simplest solution to '.,,'hat will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best soIution is to have left ;urn directional lanes only into tile shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway, Additional comments: Yours truly/'~ Name~.s) (Please Print~ '-7f5- /oD Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We 7~Se/t~ L. C0'~,eb/ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North w'i~h tile large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to t07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light lit, king up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. the~ we ask that you include. along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Youths truly. Name(s) (Please Print) Telephone number Br:ard of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34l 12 Dear Commissioners. b'We ,':5,--Z ~ ,._ ;..?/.,¥',,---~' ,," / arc most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will Cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundar~ road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Signam~ __ / . Name(si (Please Print) Address Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We !. '~ 12_C.-;-,)~.~- / ~ 4,~ , ,.4~, arc mos/c.:ncerncd about the plans to line up 107th Avenue No~h with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. Thc desired southern boundary road in the project linking up wkh 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before thc Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that thc ~raffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108ih We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. Ir a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier phm, a resolution to close 107th :md 108th at thc end of the co~ercial section, forming a hnrsesh~ around 8th Cr~urt E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will & a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is ~o have Ich turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves belier than being destroyed by huge developments across d~e highway. Addluonal comments. Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We arc roost c,mccrned about the plans to line. up 107th Avenue Norlh with the large new shopping center on lmmokalec Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road h-~ the p, oject tinki,g up with 107th will rnakc matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience beret,:, the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on flickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day, They did not have a major shopping center at the olher end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 1081h as it links up ir> 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barren Collier pi:m, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next bc~t solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: 12B2 -,. ;, Board of CotHlty Commis,~ioncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, / to lin~' U'p 107th A~nu: $orfl~ witt~ d~e large new shopping cenler on lmmokalce Road and US 41, This will cause 107d~ m be:omc a major cupfl~rough mum inlo the center. The desired soud~rn boundary road in the project linking up wid~ 107d~ will make matters worse, We know from the Pine ~idge experience befor: the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built lha~ Ihe traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,~0 whides per day. They did not have a major shopping cemer at the o~hcr end. So imagine what is going to happen m 107~h, and also 108th ns it links up to 107th at 8th Cou~ E, We do not want an access road wid] a ligh~ linking up m any avenue in Naples ParR, a signaled liners:etlon at 107d~ Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along wilh the Barron Collier phm, a r:solution m close 107th aad I0~1~ at the end of the commercial section, forming a horsesh~ around 8th Court E, This would be the cheapest and simplest solulion to wha[ will be a major problem. If ynu do not approve closing al]ese two avenues dmn dm next he~l solulinn is m have left mrn directional lanes only into Ihe shopping cenmr from US 41, Naples Park deserves betler than being destroyed by huge developmems across d~e highway. Additional commems: Dam: //--//' ~ Board of County Commisshmcrs 330l Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to line up 107tt~ Avcnue North wict~ thc large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through mum into the centcr. Thc desired soudmrn boundnry road in thc project linking up with 107th will make mattcrsworsc. Wcknow from thc Pine Ridg¢cxpcricncebcforcthcVanderbih Beach Road extension was built d~at tim traffic on Hickory Blvd cxcc¢dcd 10,000 vehicles per day, Thcv did not bare a major shopping center at tl~c other end. So imagine what is go~ng to I~appcn to 107th, and also 108tl~ as it links up to I07th at 8tt~ Court E. Wc do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled inmrscction at I07~ Avenue is fi)rced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with thc Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of thc commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would b¢ the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues tl~en thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into thc shopping ccnmr from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge devclopmcms across thc highway. Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please .~,~int) - Address ?///- ;7 Telephone number 1 2B2 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on I~okalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to ~co~ a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will re'eke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on ttickory Bird exceeded 10,~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping ~nter at the other end. So imagine what is goin~ to happen to 107th, and also 108th ~ it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. ~en we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a borsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what willbe a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next be~ solution is to have let~ turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better ~an being destroyed by huge developments acres tim highway. Yours truly. Name(s) (Please Pdm) Address Telephone number ! Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We P,N<':~'-I$' D'\ !- Tcc",,?x 0xOr,~,t~ 't'--. are most c~,qcerned about the plans to line up 10?th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Irtwnokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to Happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collicr plan, a resolution to close 10']th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to Have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping cemer from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additiona[ comments: Yours truly,/ Name(s) (Please Prim) Address Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 330l Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, to line tip '10~'th Avenue Nord{ with the large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going [o happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th awJ 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway Additional comments: Yo~truly, Signature /ol /.rz,. ,-77 Na~:~(.~ (Please Print) Address Telephone number 1 2B 2 Board of County Commissioners 330i Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, /Wc /P, are most concerned about thc plans lo line up 107th ~kvenue North with the large new shoppinu comer on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become ~ major cut-t~rough route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project li~ing up with 1071h will mhke matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vand~rbHt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on H~ckory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as k links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at i07th Avenue is forced upon us, then ',ye ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close I07th and i08th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe ~round 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will ~ a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn diroctionaI lanes o~y into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature Name(s) (Please ?rim) Addres~ T¢I¢phon~ number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, arc most cnqcerncd about the plans to line up 107tl~ Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a maj~w cut-thr~eh route into the center. Th,, d_~ired s~.l.e,n boundap~ read in the projc:: lir~Jnz uz ' - ~.,, 0 th maucrs worse. Wc know from thc Pine Ridge ~x~r:e~e ~fore t~c Va~erbilt ~ach Road extension was built that thc traffic on Hickor', Bird cxc~ 10.~ vehicles day. They did not have a major sb~pping center at tb~ o~r er~. ~3 ~im going to happen to 107~h. aM Mso 108th ~ i~ liv~* up to i07uh a~ Sth Coum E. We do not want an access ro~ wi~ a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naplm Park If a signaled intersection at 10r~ Ave~e is forced upon us. then we rusk that yt~ ir~lude. along with the Barren Colhcr plan. a resolution to close 107th ~ l~h at tFm er~ of the commercial section, fona~ a hor~sh~ around 8th Court E. This w~Id cheapest and simplest soluti,m to '*'~t wilt be a major problem. If you do m~ appre'.c closing these two avenues tb~ ~ ~xt ~st solution is to have left mrn dir~tioml lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves ~t~er being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Signat m~,~, ~ . Name(s) (Please Pr n~ Address Telephone number Board of C~>unty Cnmmissi~mers 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/~ ~ - ' , to me up ~u/th Aven~o~h with the larg~ew shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107Ih to become a major cut-through route imo the cen~er. The desired southern boundar/road in the project linking up with 107th wiii make matters worse, We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded I0,~0 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107~ at 8th Court E, We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horsesh~ around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will & a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping c~ter from US 41. Nap es Park de~es better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: ~04~5~ Yours truly, Signal? ~ ~ame(s) (Please Print) Address // Telephone number Board of County Commissinncrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34I 12 Dear Gonmfissioners. /z' "- q. ~ most ,',interned about IRc plans Io line up 107th Avenue North whh ~c large new shopping ccn~er on hnmokalcc Road and US41. This will cause 10?thmbecomea majorcuHhrou~hrouteinlothccenmr, Thc desired snuthcrn boundary road in thc projccl linking up wHh 107th will make matters worse. We know from thc Pine Ridge experience bcfbrc thc Vandcrbih Beach Road extension was built 1hal the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,~ vdficlas per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end, So imagine wbat is going ta happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to If)Tfl~ at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park, If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier phm, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a ho~esho¢ around 8ttt Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to wlmt will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional hmes only into the shopping center fromUS41, Naples Parkdcscrvesbctterthan being destroyed by huge dcvdopmcn~s across thc highway. ~.. q . ~ ~ .. ~. - . ~ ) ~ . ~- ,. ~. ~ .,~ Yours truly. Signatur~ T¢lephon~ number 3301 'J';lllli;lllli Trail N;iplcs. Fh,'id:t 34112 DC;iF (/OIlllIIIS5 i(}I1CI'S, [/W~ ~l(l'~ ~'~o~ arc nicst c,".ccr~cd ;th~mt linc phm.s (~ linc up 107lh Avenue Nm'Ih wJlJl lJlc large nq'a' sh(,ppitig center oil [mmnk;JJcc Road and US 41. This will c;msc 107Ih 1o I~CCoIBe ii lll;I.j~)r Cu[ .Ihl'MlI~h ri)flit Jlllo thc COllier. Thc desired smahcrn h~)uml;~ry r(~;td m rim projccl [inkina up w']lh I07th will make matters worse. Wc knnw fr'lml Ibc Pine Ridge experience hclbrc thc V;mdcrhilt Beach Road cxlcnsion was huih Ill;it lilt Ir;l¢fic mi Ilickory Bh'd cxcccdcd 10.000 vehicles per d;ly. They did nm have a m;ijor shopping Comer at Ibc other cml. So imagine what a sfgnalcd inlcrsccdmt aI If)7[h .,Xvcauc is fcrccd upm] u~. Ihcl~ wc ask Ih;it you include. thc commercial scclion, fi)truing :l hol'scshoc around 8ih Couri E. This would hc cheapest and shnplcst sohJlion h) what will be a major p 'o *lcm It' you do not approve closing (hose two avenues thc~ thc next best soJutiml is lo have Icl'l ifil'ii dJrcclionaJ hmcs only inlo risc shopping comer J'ronl {]S 41. N i aplcs Park deserves bcltcr being dcstru)'cd by huge dcvch)pmcnts across IJlc highw;ty. AddiJin/laJ COlllIllCll[S 7 1 2 B 2 Date: ~t /*~lct~ Board of County Comnfissi,mcrs 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ~; ch~c&~ ~ ~ are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue Norfl~ with tt~c largo new shopping center on hnmokalce Road and US 41. This will cause 107d~ to become a major cut-through route into the comer. Thc desired soufl~eFn bounda~ road in thc project linking up x~i~l~ 107d~ will make maucrs worse. We know From die Pine Ridge experience before d~e Vanderbiit Beach Rond extension was buik dmt thc traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a majnr shopping center at thc other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107d~, and also 108d~ as it links up to 107th at 8th Court g. We do not wnnt an access mad widi a light linking up m any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. d~cn wc ask that you include, along wid~ the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to dose 107th and 108th at the end of die commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be thc cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a mi0or problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then lhe next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center Frown US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly Signamre --' Name(s) (Please Plinl) Address Telephone number 2B2' i ' Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, I/We ,./~,/../~ ~o~.w,,..~2- '/ arc most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will r~ake matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience be/br'.: the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a ligh£ link. ing up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve ch)sing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, :ii -'~' -,.[ca6-;.4 h'q O,qoO,.,~ow>' Name(s) (Please Print) Address woo - .-,/o>o------ Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 330l Tam(ami Trail East Naples, FIorida 34i 12 Dear Commissioners, I/We '~]:..,(,~,~,c,L.X'd...,. ~' ~-'~st concerned aborn the plans to line up 107th Avenue North ~vith ~he large n~w shopping cemer on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cau~ 107th to become a major cut-through route into the cemer. The desired southern bounda:y mad in thc l:oj¢ct ilnking up ~Gth i07th w~il make matters worse. We know from tim Pine Ridge e~perienc¢ betbre the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was buil~ ~at the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagin~ what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up m 107th at 8th Court E. We do not xvant an access road with a light li~ing up to any avenue in Naples Park, If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the co:ere(al section, foxing a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues Ihen the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Yours truly, S~gnature ' NameCs) (Please Print) q,.'-/w,: Address ::'// Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail Eas~ Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We /2~'~'.~ '~4'~' ~; ~1~ are most concerned abou[ the pIans to line up 107~h Avcnu~ Nord~ with the large new shoppm~ center on I~okalee Road and US,U. Tbiswillcausc 107d~tob¢comcamajorcub[hroughroumimod]¢ccntcr. mau~rs worse. We know from [hc Pin~ Ridge ~xperi~ncc before tbc Vandcrbik Beach Road ex[ension was built [hal the mfffic on Hickory Bird exceeded 10,0~ vehicles per day. They did no[ have a major shopping center at dm other end. So imagine what is going to happen [o 107th. and also 108th as it links up lo I0?th al 8th Court E. Wc do no[ want an access road with a ligh[ li~ing up [o any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection al 107lb Avenue is forced upon us, lhen wc ask [hal you include, along with d~e Barton Collier plan, a resolution [o close 107th and 108lb al thc end of the co~]ercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Coum E. This would b¢ cheapest amd simplest soludon ~o what will bca major problem, It' you do no¢ approve closing these two avenues then die nex~ best solution is ~o have left turn directional lanes only' in[o the shopping con[er from US 41, Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge devdopments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Name(s) (Please Print) b,? '/ Address Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. / I/We are mo~'. concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on hnmokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into tile center. The desired southeru boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vandcrbilt Beach Road extension was buiIt t!mt the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per clay. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 81h Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along witll thc Barton Collier plan. a resolution to close 107:h and 108th at the end of tile commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Conrr g. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do oot approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naph:s Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly,f... z- . Signature .. Name~s) (Please Print) AdOres~ Telephone number Date: / ' Board of County Corrunissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with I0?th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the trnffic on Hickory Bird exceeded I0,~ vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th ~ it li~s up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road wi~t a Iigh~ Ii.ag up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107~ Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask ~at you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, foxing a horseshoe around 8tl~ Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left mrn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better t~an being destroyed by huge developments across the highwpy. Additional comments: ~ Yours truly,, Narne(s)~ (Please Pril~t), ,~ ,--, , f I ' Te~phone' n~bcr - Board of County' Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples. Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners. ',?e .. . . . concerne about the p,ans to hnc up 107th Avcnuc North w~th thq~arge new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to I~ecome a major cut-through route into thc centcr. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickoo' Bird exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also I08th as it links up to I07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barron Collier plan, a resolution to close 107ih and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across thc highway. Additional comments: Yours truly. Name(s) (Pease Prim) A&!ress Telephone number Date: Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners, " :~: %.': pi I/We ~;. ¢,. , :t ,, . c._.w arc mo.: concerned about the ans to line up 107th Avenue North with the 1,4rge new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will m'ake matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,1300 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th a.s it links up to i07th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaIed intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close lC]th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signalurc , ,,/ ..z/ ,_. I'~. 14, ~_ Namers) (Please Print) I;.:¢'(- /:' Y T ::' ,~',"5: .'-' Address z-" ;' 7 hz . Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami 'Frail East Naples, Elorida 34i 12 Dear Commissioners, I/We .L ~'-l.-' ,..:, "u, · ,. are most coocerned about the plans to line up 107th, Avenue North with the lange new shopping center on Irm-nokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th'~o become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience before the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension was built that the traffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th, and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court E. We do not want an access road with a liglx linking up to any avenue in Naples Park. If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us, then we ask that you include, along with the Barton Collier plan, a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapest and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then the next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 4I. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments ac'mss the highway. Additional comments: Yours truly, Signature \~ Name(s) (Please Print) Address 56¢)-" 5, 5- Telephone number Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tarniami Trail East Naples. Fk)rida 34112 Dear Commissioners. I/We ...... . are most concerned about the plans to line up 107th Avenue North with the large new shopping center on Immokalee Road and US 41. This will cause 107th to become a major cut-through route into the center. The desired southern boundary road in the project linking up with 107th will make matters worse. We know from the Pine Ridge experience boil)re thc Vanderbih Beach Road extension ',vas buih that tile Iraffic on Hickory Blvd exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day. They did not have a major shopping center at the other end. So imagine what is going to happen to 107th. and also 108th as it links up to 107th at 8th Court We do not want an access road with a light linking up to any avenue in Naples Park· If a signaled intersection at 107th Avenue is forced upon us. ther we ask that you include. along with the Barron Collier plan. a resolution to close 107th and 108th at the end of the commercial section, forming a horseshoe around 8th Court E. This would be the cheapesl and simplest solution to what will be a major problem. If you do not approve closing these two avenues then thc next best solution is to have left turn directional lanes only into the shopping center from US 41. Naples Park deserves better than being destroyed by huge developments across the highway· Additional comments: Yours truly. · ' Name(s) (Ple~e Print) Address lelephone numar ~ples, FL 339~ kffi~vtt of Publicati~ ~aples O,lly Ne~s ~LES FL ~101-~16 State of Flori~ ~fore the ~er~i~ aut~rity, ~rs~lLy ~r~ B. ~, ~ ~ ~th says t~t ~he serves c~ of ~ertJmi~ wa~ ~li~h~ in said ~s~r ~ ~retofore ~en c~ttn~sly ~li~ in ~mid Collier C~nty, Florida, each Collier C~ty, Flori~, (or a ~rt~ of 1 year p~i~ ~y ~r~, ~tra or c~ra:t~ any '~Lt~tt~ tn the ~aid n~s~per. P~ZSHEO ~: 10/25 ' ~ SPACE: 94.~ ~HCH ' F~O ~: 10/26/~ 'Stature of Afft~t ~/ /~'~ ~rn to ~ ~scri~f_~l~re ~ this.~,-:.,day of · (~r..].u~L'b~ tt~Ls cove.=) 1 ~ ilii11111111111111111111~1111!i1111111111111111111111111111111111~ Z, OI~.~ZO~I. ~ DA]~IZ ~ ~ ' illlili1111111111111111111111111111111111111i111111111111111111 October 2, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: SV-98-2 Pole Sign Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Purchase No. 804611 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, NOV]KMBER 10, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Waples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition No. SV-98-2, William D. Keith, Esquire, representing Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist, P.A., requesting a 15-foot variance from the required front yard setback of 15 feet to 0 feet along U.S. 41 and from the required front setback of 15 feet to 10 feet along Osceota Avenue for a pole sign located at 3550 East Tamiami Trail, on the northwest corner of U.S. 41 and Osceo!a Avenue, in Section 13, Townshiop 50 South, Range 25 East. NOTE: Ail persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations befor~ the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COFiMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAI~4AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk ( SEAL ) October 2, 1998 William D. Keith, Esquire Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist, P.A. 3550 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 RE: REVISED: Public Hearing to Consider Petition SV-98-2 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA ~ 3 REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: XXX Normal legal Adverliscmem [] Other: ~i~lay Adv. l~lion, etc.) OdginafingDepffDiv: Con n Dcv. Sc~'./Planning Per.n: ~ ~~ Dale: Pelition No. (If none, give brief de~fiption): SV-98-2 Petitioner: (Name & Address): William D. Kcilh, E~uire, Cardillo, Kcith & Bonaquis: P.A. 3550 F~ast Tamiami Trail, ~ 341124905 ' Name & Address of any ~rmn(s) to ~ notified by Clerk's O~ce: (If more space is needed, attach mpamte sh~t) Hinting ~forc BCC XXX BZA Other R~ucstcdtfcaringdate: ' ~ ~ 1 ,~ Bascdonad,'crliscmcmap~anngl5days~f~rchcahng Newspa~r(s) to ~ used: (Complete only if im~nant): ~ Naples Daily News Other ~ ~gally Required Pro~d Text: (Include Ie~l dc~ription & common I~ation & Size: Petitiou No. SV-98-2, WilIiam D. Keith, E~uim, r~re~nting Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist, P.A., requesting a 15-f~t vahan~ from the required front yard ~lback of 15 f~t to 0 feet along ~.S. 41 and from thc required front ~tback of 15 feet to 10 feet along ~cola Avenue for a ~le sign l~t~ at 3550 East Tamiami Trail on 0~c nonhwesl comer of U.S 41 and Osccola Avenue, in Seclion 13, Tox~nship 50 Soulh, ~nge 25 Ea~. Companion ~tition(s), if any & pro~d bmmng date: D~s Petition Fee include advertising cost? ~es ~ No If Yes, what account should ~ charged tbr advertising costs: i 13-1383~4491 l0 ~ Reviewed by: ~ ~ 0 q' l Approved by: Division H~d Dam Connty Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS ~ For hearings before BCC or B~: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division }!ead approval before mbmitting to County Manager. Note: If legal d~ument is invoh'ed, be sure that any necessa~ legal redew, or ~quest for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will dlst~bute copies: ' ~ County Managcr agenda file: to ~ Requesting Division ~ Original Clerk's Office B. Other heatings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's O~ce, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONe: ~/ ~ x RESOLUTIOI~ NO, 98- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER SV-98-2, FOR A SIGN VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED iN COLLIER COUNTY, PLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public, and WHEREAS, the Count}. pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances, and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 15 foot variance from the required front yard setback of !5 feet established for signs to 0 feet along U.S. 41 and a five foot variance from the required front setback of 15 feet established for signs to 10 feet along Oceola Avenue for a pole sign as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in f C-3 zone for the property hereinafter ~escribed, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning ail applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County, and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled and the Board having conszdered ail matters presented, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier Count},, Florida, that: t A1 The Petition SV-98-2 filed by William D. Keith, Esquire, representing Cardi!lo, Keith & Bonaquis~, P.A. with respect to the proper%?' hereinafter described as: Exhibit be and the same hereby is approved for a It-foot variance from the required front yard setback of !5 feet established for signs to 0 feet along U.S. 4! and a five-foot 7ariance from the ~equired front setback of i5 feet established for signs to !0 feet alon] Oceola Avenue for a pole slgn as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the C-3 zoning distric~ wherein said Froperty is located. BE iT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number SV-98-2 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of i998. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBAra. B. BERRY, CMairman Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjord6 ~Z ~tua~nt Assistant County At:orney f/sv-ge-2 RESOLUTION LEGAl. DESCRIPTION 3550 EAST mA/MIAMI TRAIL Comme~z~g at thc Point of Beginning oFPARCEL A; thence run N89-41-00E a distance of 286.03 feet to the Point of Beginning of PARCEL B; thence continue N89-41-00E a distance of 139.60 feet to the Southwesterly boundary of the Tamiami 'Frail (US 41); thence S38-47-30E along said Southwesterly boundary a distance of 59.24 feet to a concrete munument; thence S51- 12-30W along the Northerly Right of Way of Osceola Avenue a distance of 131.60 feet to a concrete monument; thence N89-41-00W along said Northerly Right of Way a distance of 100,00 feet; thence leaving said Northerly Right of Way line run N11-29-03E a distance of 129.90 feet to the Point of Beginning of Parcel B. ATTORNEYS AT LAW "~' 3550~ (].nolud~ k~s cove~) ~ ~ 1 Collier county C~urthouse ',,~ ~ October 2, 1998 Ms. Judi Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Legal Advertising for Petitions A-98-4, PUD-98-11, V-98-8, V-98-18, and SV-98-2 Dear Judi: Please 'kill" the above-referenced ads which were all to be run in the October 11, 1998 edition of the paper. These petitions will be advertised for a meeting in November and new letters and notices will be forthcoming. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 1998 TO: Maureen Kenyon, Supervisor Clerk of Ccurts FROM: Vincent A. 3aut~lCP, Administrator Community' Development and Environmental Services SUBJECT: Requesl for Legal Advertising of Public Hearings This memorandum serv{.s as a request to readvertlse the following petitions for the November 10. 1998 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners. The petitions were originally advertised for the October 27, 1998 but as that me,ting has been canceled, it is necessan/Io readvertise for November 10, 1998. V-98-18 SV-98-2 A-98-4 PUD-98-11 V-98-8 Thank you Ior your attention to this matter and please feel free to call upon me or my staff If we can be of assistance. xc: Bob Mulhere, AICP, Planning Services Director Cecilia Martin, PJ~,nning Technician RESOLUTION NO. 98- 463 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER SV-98-2, FOR A SIGN VARIANCE ON PROPERTY BEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COU!ITY, FLORISA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zonin<: and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public, and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code {Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances, and NHEREAS, the 5card uf Zoning Appeals being the duly elected constituted Boazd of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 15 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 15 feet established for signs to 0 feet along U.S. ~1 and a five foot variance from the requi:-ed front setback of 15 feet established for signs to ]0 feet /!long Oceola .-.venue for a pole sign as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in a C-.3 zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a mat~er of fact that satisfactory provlsion and arrangement have been made concerning ali applicable matters required by said regulations and in ~ccordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County, and WHEREAS, ali. interested parties have been oiven opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented, NOW TBEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition SV-98-2 filed by William D. Keith, Esquire, representing Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist, P.A. with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" be and the same hereby is pp~oved for a 15-foot variance from the required front yard setback of i5 feet established for signs to 0 feet along U.S. 4! and a five-foot variance from the required front setback of 15 feet established for signs to 10 feet along Oceola Avenue for a pole sign as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the C-3 zoning d'o 1,~t-l_~ wherein said property is located. BE iT RESOLVEO that this Resolution relating to Petition Number SV-98-2 be ~o~ed in the minutes of th_.~ Board. This R,s~=~o~, adop%ed after motion, second and majority vote. Done this /~.~ day of ~~-' 1998. A~ .~ST: . %' BOARD OF ZOHiNG APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, ~.lerk COLLIER COU[ITY, FLORIDA ' ' BAR~RA B. B~RR~~- signature' Appro',ed as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3__550 EAST TAiMbk~I I TRAIL Comm~'en~ng at the Point of Beginning of PARCEL A; thence mn N89-41-00E a distance of 286.03 feet to the Point of Beginning of PARCEL B; thence continue N89-41-00E a distance of 139.60 feet to the Southwesterly boundary of the Tamiami Trail (US 41); thence S38-47-30E along said Southwesterly boundary a distance of 59.24 feet to a con:!ete munument; thence S51- 12~30W along the Northerly Right of Way of Osceola Avenue a distance of 131.60 feet to a concrete monument; thence N89-41~00W along said Northerly Right of Way a distance of I00.00 feet; thence leav/ng said Northerly Right of Way line run N11-29-03E a distance of 129.90 feet to the Point of Beginning ofParceI B. RECEIVED °LANNt,NG SI~}-I VIC E,~ EXtlIPiT "B" $ I/ .9 .s- .p. ,, T£L:g4i~262-5192 Dec 03,9? 12!46 No,OO5 P,O~ ,f I .... .... ~b~ ~ , ..... ........ ] -~. '~,, ,.,, & BO~AqUIST ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3550 ~ot~ce ~s here~/ ~ven that the Board of County ' ' Co~s~oner~ of Collier County, will hold a public hear~ on ~AY, ~D~a ~0, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, A~ntstration Build~'~ C'oli'ier Co~]nty Government Center, 3301 East Tamlaml Trail, ~lap~es, Florida, ~)e meeting will beg~.n at 9:00 A,M, The Board will consider Petition A-98-5, KlmPatrick' ' ~ Kobza, of 'Freak, er, Kobza & Volpe, P,A. representing the SoJthpolnte Br,,]t Slip o'~mers at the Southpolnte Yacht Club at Windstar ,4arena, and ~;lenn Oakes, Lee Flandreau and Jack F~nk, requesting an appeal of a deter;~il~ation of · n~ub.~tantial chanf4e to the Southpointe Yacht Club PUD ~4aster Plan, ordinance 88-R2, as ar~ended, rendered by the Planning Services Director pursuant to the provision~ set forth in section 2,7,3,5.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code, ~r~ All persons wJ.~3hin~j to spe~k on any age~da item must re~J~Jter ~ny item. The ~electlon of an ~ndividual to ~peak cm beha].f of oloa~lzatlon or group i~ encouraoed, If recor~nized ~/t the Chairman, spokesperaon for a ~oup or oroaaJzatton may be al!.otted l0 mint t(~ to sDeak on an item. Peraoni~ wishinq to have written or qraphicrna~er]a' ' 1~: ~ncludcd~ ' in the prior Lo the respective p,~bl]c heaziag. In ar~y ca;:e, ',/litton intended to be ' ' the ' considered by ~5oar(] sbal] be sub;'a~tted ~o ~:he apprO~rlate County start a minJraum of ~leven ~]<ly~: prior BO 5he public hearinq, Ali material used in preaentatlon~: belt, re the Dcard'~',~1.~ b~cor~e a permanent part of. the record, Any person who dec,des to appeal a d.cis~on of the Board will head a record of the proceedings pertaining-~h.retoa and tbereforn,. ~y need 9~g~re that a verbatim record of the proce_.]inc/~ ~ "].~; made, which record includes the testimony an<] evidence upon 7;hich th~: appeal i.7 based. BOARD OF COU?I~/ C)I~4I.~IO, IER~,'r c,c. , · COLLIER CO~I~/, F~RIDA BARBARA B, ,>~RRY, CHAIRI4AH ~IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /fl/bins ,>t.ele, Deputy Clerk (SgAL} October 2, 1998 Ms, Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: A~98-5 Southpointe Yacht Club at Windstar l~arina Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Purchase No. 804611 October 2, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition A-98-5, an Appeal of a determination of insubstantial change to the Southpointe Yacht Club PUD Master Plan Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 2, 1998 Kim Patrick Kobza Treiser, Kobza & Volpe, P.A. The Northern Trust Btdg 4001 Tamiami Tr. N. #330 Naples FL 34103 Public Hearing to Consider Petition A-98-5 Southpointe Yacht Club at Windstar Marina Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10,1998 as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure II ~,~ t ~r: (,~ ~ ~): ~i~ Patr~c~ ~Qbza, Treiser~Kobza & Volpet P.A. The Northern Trust Bld5 4001 Tamiami Tr.N. ~330 '~ap~, F]~. 34103 P2~TION: A-gs-~, ~ PATMCK EOBZA, OF TRHIS[R['~0BZA A VOLP~, P.A., ~P~S~NT~G THB SO~o~ BOAT SO~HPO~T~ YA'CHT CL~ AT ~STAA MANNA, ~ GLBR~ O~S, LBB FL~D~AU AND ffAC~ F~, ~QUgST~G ~ /~PB~ OF A DBT~AYION OF [NS~STANT[AL CHANGB YO THB SO~OINTB YACHT CL~ PUD ~STBR PL~, ~OPT~D BY O~ANCB ~g-~2, AS ~B~ED, ~NDE~D BY THB PL~G S~RV[CHS DI~CTOR P~UA~ TO THE PROVISIONS SBT FORTH ~ SECTION 2.7.3,i2. OF THB COLLIER CO~ L~ DBVBLOPMBNT CODB. / Y , County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLU~ COUN~ COU~OUS~ 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST EO, ~.OX 413044 N~LES. FLORIDA ~I01-3~ CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER Clerk CLERK BOARD O~ COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October 2, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Nearing to Consider Petition A-98-5, an Appeal of a determination of insubstantial change to the Southpointe Yacht Club PUD Master Plan Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, I~HT E.~BROCK, CLERK Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 13A2~; Property Information Report Property Information Report Coller County Board of County Commissioners Printed on R/ 3/§R I0:43:47AH CD~Plus for Windows 95/NT Page 1 of 1 13A2~ Property Information Report Coller County Board of Count'/ Co~is$1ongrs Property Information Report Property Information Report Property Information Report Property Information Report 511 Property Information Report Property Information Report Coller County Board of County CoMmissioners Printed on A/ 3/98 11:DB:45AM CD-Plus for Windows 95/NT 1 3A2I~. Property Information Report Property Information Report Coller County Board of County Com~nissioners Printed on B/ 3/g~ I]:06:]RAM CO-Plus for Windows 95/NT Property Information Report Property Information Report I tAZ Nla. Property Information Report Property Information Report CDPRiO02 - Property information Report f_qULL LEG__AL_ DESCRIPTIO~ Property Information Report CDPB1002 - P:ope?.y ~nforma~i~n Report FOLIO :;2R Coller County Board of County Co~issioners Printed on fi/ 3/gfl ll:fig:OKAM CD-P/US for Windows 95/NT Page 1 of I Property Information Report Coiler Coun%y Board of Coun%y Commissioners Printed on R/ 3/9S 11:0g:~7AM CD-Plus for Wladows 95/N? Page 1 of 1 Property Information Report CDPRI$02 - Property Informa%ion ReTort Property Information Report PREVIOUS OWNER MARINA COVE NAPLES LTD ~_~LL LEGAL DESCRIPTION Property Information Report CDPR1002 - Property information Report ..... .... ~EA TOTAL AC~E£ ACSC HDR REF FLAG / / / / Property Information Report CDPRIO02 - Property [-' - ~ Property Information Report Property Information Report / Property Information Report Property Information Report Coller County Eoard of Ccun%y Co~nis$ioners Prinked on R/ 3/9~ 11:14:43AH CD-Plus for Windows 95/~;TPageI of] Property Information Repo~ PREVIOUS OWNER ~%~uRINA COVE NAPLES LTD FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION Coller County Board of Coun:y Ccm~ls$ioners Printed on R/ 3/~fl II:IS:13AM CD-PJU$ for Windows 95/NT 1 3 A2,~. Property Information Report CD?R1002 -?roperty informat±~n PREVIOUS O~£R MARINA COVE NAPLES LTD FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION Coller Coumty Board of County Commissioners Prinsed on R/ 3/98 11:15:46AM Property Information Report Page ] of 1 13A2_~ Property Information Report Property Information :~00~ - ~o~ ~o~.~o~ ~o~ Property Information Report~ ~ :DPR~.002 - Propez-:y Ir~f~rrna:io~ Repot: '~ ~ ~, ~_, ~1~. PREVIOUS Naples Daily Naplel, FL 339~ BOARD OF COUNTY CO~NISSiONERS ATTN: MIATTA SlRL~AF PO BOX 41~016 NAPLES FL 3RqOq-3Oq6 REFERENCE: 0~230 806611 57T67~0t V-98-18 ~OTICE OF PU State of Florida Co~lty of Collier Before the undersigned authority, perso+nally ~ of adverttalng ~ras publtahed in said AD SPACE: 95.0(X] IHCH FILEI ON: 10/26/98 S gnature Of Affiant IIIIIIIIii11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111 ,11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i111111111111111111 October 2, 1998 ITs. Judith FJana~an Naples Daily i075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: V-~8-t8 VJctori~ Lakes Condominium Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice <~ne %ime on Sunday, October 25, i~;4, and kiI]d[y send th~ Affidavit of Publication, in d~plicat~, to~ether with char~es involved to this Office~ Thank you, Oisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Purchase t;o, 804611 1 3A3m I )l JCl; OF PUBbI(! Notice i~J her~,b7 c/[yen t,h,at th~ Boord o[ CgunLy Cot~n~iOner~ of 'l'h~ t3o~rd a~l] c'vn~Jder Petition No. V~9~154, C, Dean nmtth of Q, ~qU~t~d ]0~ft)Ol_ Itc,ilL 7qrd ~Cbac~ ' Lo J0 feel olonu Attpor~-Pull~ng i~e/A, ~}~ aelect~oli of ali ~ndividual ~.o gpeak on behalf O~ an oroanizatton et group tt~ encouraged, If recognized by tho Chairman, ~pok~mman (ota Err)up or orc/antzatton may }>e allotted 10 minutea to l'erm~tu~ wlghlt~9 to, h,nv,~ written or graphic ~otor~.al~ included in i~9~ded tO be considered by the Board ghall b~ ~ubmittod tO the) Any p~r~on who d_cid~a~ ' 1,,, appeal a <lecJt]ton t)f !.he Board will need ~o ~H~Ure t;hot a verbal;lin ~ccord r)f tiJir~ · P~(--~,~(llr~n la made, which record ltlCllidp~ t.};,, ~,2;:ttmon,/ ,nt;,l ,wtd,.nc,~ ul-,n Mil ~: tho BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CObblER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA g, BERRY, CIIAIRMAN DWIOIIT E, BROCK, CI, EIiK By: /s/bi.~a Steele, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) October 2, ]998 C. Dean Smith Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Re: REVISED: Public }{earing to Consider Petition V-98-18 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to a[tend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 2,1998 Victoria Lakes Condominium Association % Gulfview Property Management 2335 Tamiami Trail North Suite 303B Naples, FL 34103 Re: ~{EVISED: Public Hearing to Consider Petition V-98-18 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing~ Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure COLLIEB COU ,T ' ELORIDA BEQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place I~e followln~ ~ Normal legal Adveni~mem ~ Oilier: (Display Adv.. 1~6on. Ofigina6ng Dcpd Div: Comm Dcv Se~,~lanning Person: Petition No. (If none. give brief description): v-gg- Petitioner: (Name & Address): Vicloria Lakes Condominium A$~ialion, % GulfvJcw Pro.nv Management. 2335 'rami~mi Trail Noqh, ~uilc 303B, Naples, FL 34 Name & Addr~ of any ~r~n/s) to ~ nolified by Clerk's Office: (If mom space is nome. al[ach ~para~c sh~l C. Doan Smittz Q. ~mdv Minor & As~ia~es, P.A, 3g~ Via Dc} R~', Bonito Sprin~s, H~ 3~134 H~ring ~forc BCC XXX BZA O[bcr ~ Ba~d on advc~i~ment ap~anng 1~ days ~forc h~ring Ncwspa~r(s) to ~ u~: (Complete only if im~nan0: ~ Naplcs Daily News Other ~ Mgally Rcquircd Pro~d Text: (Include legal dcarip6on a common I~ation & Size: Pclifion~o, V-9g~pi~h f . rod Mi~r and A i P.A r r nfin Victoria Lakes n ominium As i fr n~r b~k I 10 f~t alon Ai~a-Pullin~ Road and a 23 f~l varian~ from Ibc rcquir~d 30-f~t frgni yard ~lba~k Io 7 feet ~loni Berkshire Slrcct and Noitinaham Drive for pro.ay I~aled in Bilk 2 Vic~ria Park O~ TosS6 48 Soufl~ Companion ~fi6on(s), if any a pro~d l~date: D~ Pctilion F~ include advertising cosl? ~Yes 113-1383~49110 ~tO~ No If Yes. what account shoold ~ charged for adve~ising cosls: Approved b> Division H~d Date County Manager Dale List Attachments: ~STRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearinD before BCC or BZA: Initiating per~n to complete one coy and obtain Division ttead approval before submitting 1o County Manager. Note: If legal d~umcnt is involved, be sure ~hat any nccessa~ legal review, or request for ~ame, is submitted to Count) Altornev before submillin~ Io Countv Manaaer. The Manager'~ office will distribute copies: ' - ~ Counly Manager agenda file: to ~ Requesting Division ~ Original Clerk's O~cc B. Olher h~nn~: Initiating Die, s/on bead to approve and submit o~ginal to Clerk's O~c¢. rclaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ON~YV RESOLUTION NO. 98- RELATING TO PETITIOI,I HDMBER V-98-18, POR A '/AR'iA::CE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED iN COLLIER COU[ITY, ELORIOA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Elorida in Chapter i25, Elorida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, ~Dordinate amd enforce zonlng and such business regulations as are necessary for ~he protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant ~here~o has adopted a Land Development Code {Ordinance ::o. 91-i02) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic diTislons of the Count},, among which is the granting of veriances; and WHEREAS, ~ne Board of Zoning Appeals, belng ti~e duly elected constituted Board cf the area hereby nffected, has held a public hearing after notice as ix sale regulations made ~nd provided, and has considered the aov[sabziily of a 20-foot variance from the re?:~red 30-foot front yard setback to i0 feet aion] Airport-Pulling Road and a 23 foot variance from the reguzred 20-foo~ front yard setback to 7 feet along Berkshire Stree~ and Nottingham Drive as shown cn the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an RMF-i2 Zone for th{! property hereinafter descrioed, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been mace concerning all applicable mat~ers re.]uired by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the L~nincorpozated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, ali interested ~arties have seen given opportunity to be heard by ~his Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered ail ma~ters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE iT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD ON ZOOMING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition V-98-18 filed by C. Dean Smith of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Victoria lakes Condominium Association, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: 8tock 2 Victoria Park One, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 7-8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same hereby is approved ~o~ a ~O-foot ~ariance ~om the required 30-foot front yard setback to 10 feet along Airport-Pulling Road and a 23 foot variance from the required 30-foot front yard setback to 7 feet along 5erkshire Street and Nottingham Drive as shown on the attached plot plan, S:<hibit "A", of the RMF-!2 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the folicwing conditions: EXHIBIT BE iT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-98-18 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Dcne tni£ day cf i998. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBAPA B. BERRY, Chairman Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjo~ie M. Student Assistant County Attorney I, C. Dean Smith, as authorized agent for Petition V-97-18, agree to the following stipulations requested by the Collier County Planning Commission ~n their public hearing on October 1, 1998. 1. The perimeter landscaping shall be upgraded to comply with the current LDC requirements. A landscape plan shall be provided to Development Services for review and approval. No permit for carports shall be issued unless and until the landscaping is upgraded in accordance with the approved plan, PETITIONER OR AGEN'[ State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998 by , who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath, (Signature of Notary Public) NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # My Commission Expires: REPRESENTATIVE FOR CCPC State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before rne this __ day of ,1998 by , who is personally known to :ne or who has produced as identification and who did (did not~ take an oath. (Signature of Notary Public) NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # My Commission Expi~'es: EXHIBIT "B" J OF PAG~.S ~ Iii!i!ii11111111111111111111111111111111111'iii11111111111111111 October 2, 1998 Ms. Judi Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Legal Advertising for Petitions A-98-4, PUD-98-11, V-98-8, V-98-18, and SV-98-2 Dear Judi: Please "kill" the above-referenced ads which w-~re all to be run in the October 11, 1998 edition of the paper. These petitions will be advertised for a meeting in November and new letters and notices will be forthcoming. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 98-464 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-98-18, FOR A VARIA~ICE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adcpted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, ameng which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 23 foot variance from the required 30-foot front yard setback to 7 feet along Berkshire Street and Nottingham Drive as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A', in an RMF-12 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and ir~ accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, al! interested parties have been given oDporturity to be heard by this Board in public meetiag assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition V-98-18 filed by C. Dean Smith of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Victoria Lakes Condominium Association, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Block 2 Victoria Park One, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 7-8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same hereby is approved for a 23 foot variance from the required 30-foot front yard setback to 7 feet alor~,g Eerkshire Street and Nottingham Drive as slows on the attached plot plan, ExhJ. bit "A", of the RMF-12 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: EXHIBIT BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-98-18 be recorded Jn the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Dose ~hi's /¢~ day of ~_&~ , 1998. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA aS ?:~f~ s snnS~Rn ~dent &ss~stant County Attorney I, C. Dean Smith, as authorized agent for Petition V-98-18, agree to the following stipulations requested by the Collier County Planning Commission in their public hearing on October 1, 1998. 1. The perimeter landscaping shall be upgraded to comply with the current LDC requirements. A landscape plan shall be provided to Development Services 'for review and approval. No permit for carports shall be issued unless and until the landscaping is upgraded in accordance with the approved plan. PETITIONER OR AGENT State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998 by , who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Signature of Notary Public) NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # My Commission Expires: REPRESENTATIVE FOR CCPC State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this __ day of ,1998 by , who is personally known to ~r~e or who has produced as identification and who did (did not, take an oath. (Signature of Notary Public) NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # My Commission Expires: EXHIBIT "B" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 1998 TO: Maureen Kenyon, Supervisor Clerk of Courts FROM: Vincent A. 2aut ~CP, Administrator Communib Development and Environmental Services SUBJECT: Request for Legal Advertising of Public Hearings This memorandum serv{.s as a request to readvertlse the following petitions for the November 10, 1998 me(ting of the Board of County Commissioners. The petitions were originally advertised for the October 27, 1998 but as that meeting has been canceled, it is necessary to readvertise for November 10, 1998. V-98-18 SV-98-2 A-98-4 PUD-g8.11 V-98-8 Thank you for your arran[ion to this matter and please feel free to c~ll upon me or my staff If we can be of assiltance. xc: Bob Mulhere, AICP, Planning Services Director Cecilia Marlin, Pl~,nning Technician Naples, FL 339~ Affidavit of PubLice~io~ SPACE: 90.000 INCH FZL~O Oa: 10/26/98 ~ti~i~r: (U~g~r~s): b(r. n~vid Bayer 2204 Tamiami Trail N Naples,Fla. ~41Q3 A-98-4 (FR) Wendell R. and Diane L. Keene requesting an appeal of the Collier County Planning Commission's approval of Boat Dock Petition ~BD-98-26 approved on August 20, 1998, for property located at 400 Willett Avenue, further described as Lot 10, Block N, Connors Vanderbilt Beach, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. liliilllllililliliiltillilililiililllllilliillililllliliiiilliil ~ NO. t 263-4864 an: . :. ~~/'/- ,./ Iliillillilililiilililililililllllilllillliiiillillilllilililll Collier county Courthous Tine sent: , , September 18, 199~ Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of l~ublic Hearing to Conside~ Petition A-98-4 Dear Judi: Please advertise tho_ above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 11, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. ~04611 J OF PAGES ~ (includinc~ t~is cover) liiliiilllilillllllililiilliiiiilliililiiililliliilllililiiiill LOQ~TION~ ~ ~l ~8 ~ No. s 26~8~ FROHz SLLLS ~o~m~ - ~muz~s ~ ~.co~s.~L.- .. LOCATIONz - - ~- Collier County Courthouse i,' FAX H~! (813) 774-8408 ~ PHONE'NO= (813) ??4-8406 October 2, 1998 Ms. Judi Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Legal Advertising for Petitions A-98-4, PUD-98-11, V-98-8, V-98-18, and SV-98-2 Dear Judi: Please "kill" the above-referenced ads which we£e all to be run in the October 11, 1998 edition of the paper. These petitions will be advertised for a meeting in November and new letters and notices will be forthcoming. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 1998 TO: Maureen K_~nyon, Supervisor Clerk of Ccuds FROM: Vincent A..':aut ICP, Administrator Communit~ Development and Environmental Services SUBJECT: Heques! fo' Legal Advertising of Pubhc Headngs This memorandum serv~ s as a request to readvertise the following petitions for the November 10. 1998 me(ting of the Board of County Commissione: s. The petitions were originally advertised for the October 27, lgg8 but as that meeting has been canceJed, it is necessar~ to readvertise i'or November 10, 1998. V-98-18 SV-98-2 A-984 PUD-98-! 1 V-98-8 Thank you for your attenlion to this matter and please feel free to c~,:t upon me or my stafl If we can be of assi ~tanco. xc: Bob Mulhere, AICP, Planning Services Director Cecilia Marlin, Pl~nning Technician (inc~.ud~n~j t~Ls cove~:) TOt F~ Ho. t 26~8~ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111[ili!! !i111111111111 FROH ~ ---- ELLI. E HOf'FHAN - H~TE5 ~ ~C0~S _~ ,. ~CA~ION: Collier County Cpurthouse,~ F~ ~6~ (813) 774-8408 ~ PHONE'NO: (813) 774-8406 October 2, 1998 Ms. Judith Ftanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition A-98-4 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice o:]e time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 804611 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition A-98-4, Wendell R. and Diane L. Keene, requesting an appeal of the Collier County Planning Commission's approval of Boat Dock Petition ~BD-98-26, approved on August 20, 1998, for property located at 400 Willett Avenue, further described as Lot 10, Block N, Connors Vanderbilt Beach, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. ~DTE: Ail persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent parc of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ,~ppeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY CO~MISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIrmAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL} October 2, 1998 Mr. David Bayer 2204 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 Re: Revised Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition A-98-4 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 2, 1998 Wendell & Diane L. Keene 4806 Batz Road Waunakee, WI 53597 Re: Revised Notice of Public Hearing to Cons]der Petition A-98-4 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced pe¢ition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, Noveng~er 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT couJ~ cou~,rr¥ cou~.ous~ 3301 '~AMIAMI TI~AIL E~ PO BOX ~1~ NAPleS, ~L~i~ ~101-3~ C~CUIT COUNTY COUET Dwight E, Brock COUNTY CJerk CLEEK 8OAED COUN?Y COMM~SSION~ES October 2, 1998 Re: Revised Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition A-98-4, an Appeal of the Collier County Planning Commission's Approval of Boat Dock Petition BD-98-26 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure t6A2 . This instrument prepared by: FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY Heidi Ashton Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 Property Folio No. 67491280003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA is the owner and holder of a cedain Lien by Resolution No. 98-254 against: Fox J P 1260 9"' Street NW Hickory, NC 28601 The lien was recorded on August 3'L 1998 Official Record Book 2455, Page 3239, in the Official Records Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Coud of Collier County, State of Florida. The lien secures the pnncipal sum of Two Thousand One Hundred Fifty Seven Dollars and Forty One Cents {2157 41 ), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes cedain obligation against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, which property is described as foIIows: Lot 32, Pine View Villas, Block "A", a subdivision lying in the Southeast quarter of section 13, township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida as recorded in Plat Book 9, at page 49, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. REFERENCE: 61114-010 #67491280003 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Ftorida, by execution of this Satisfaction of Lien, acknowledges payment as full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels said Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satis,'action of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier Cour Cy, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of the Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /¢ ~'~c. day of~o~u4~-.~'E~'~..~' , 1998. A~EST: · BOARD OF COUN~ COMMISSIONERS BWf~H~ E, BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest ~s to' Ch~ I~an'l Chairman RESOLUTION NO. 98- &&3 A RESOI,UTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF TEE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISAHqCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of sazd parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment aft-r which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annum on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTy COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated cf a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the follow:hq costs cf such abatement, to wit: NAME: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COST Claude E La Rue Lot 9, Block 4, NAPLES I~OR $245.00 7012 Chadwell Rd SW ADDITION, according to the plat Huntsville, AL 35802 thereof, on file and recorded in Plat Book 3, Pages 67 and 68 of the P~blic Records of Collier County, Florida. REFERENCE: 80605-027 #62092120004 The Clerk of the Board shall mall a notice of assessment of lien to the owner or cwners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (3C) days hereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this [oard upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This Resolution adopted ~ft~~ mctlon, second and majority vote. DATED: ~0~ ~ [~ ~gg~ ATTEST: ~OARD OF CODNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COO~4TY, FLORIDA ' Aft~t as t0 (hafrma~'~ B~ B. BERRY? CHA~ 2407136 0R: 2490 PG: 2364 APPROVED ~D LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: BOARD OF COUNTX COmmISSIONERS 16A3 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Li:C~%L NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN DATE: Claude E La Rue DATE: NOv ~ ~ ~9~8 7012 Chadwell Rd SW Buntsville, AL 35802 REFEP~NCE 80605-027 #62092120004 LiE~: NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRiPTiOI~: Lot 9, Block 4, N/~PLES M~%NOR ADDITION, according to the plat thereof, on file and recorded in Plat Book 3, Paqes 67 and 68 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. RBSOLUT£ON NO, 98- ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMITY COMMISSIONERS PROViDiNG FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COBT OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINanCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91~47, the direct costs of abrlte~ent ~f certain] nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost Incurred ~y the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereo[ to the County as ~o each parcel shall be calculated, . and~_po~t .d~ ~ to the Board of County Commissioners, together WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, val[d and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, %he assessment shall become due and payable ahirty (30} days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment afte~ which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent {12.0%1, per annum on any unpaid port~cn :~hereof. R~_EFERENCE: 80608-063 #57310240008 The Clerk ,}f the P~oa~d shall mail a notice of assessment of lien DATED: ~0~ t ,si.,. to-,,., fa, ,, DAVID 'WEIGEL MC ~1 1030 BOARD OF COUNTX COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIE}; Boris & Emogene Pukay 21 E Main St Mystic, CT 06355 16A3=$ A RESOLUTION DF T}{E BOARD OF COUNTY COMI4ISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDA21CE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEPEAS, st;ch ~ssessment shall be a legal, valid and bi~din~ obl~gat i~n 'Jp~n ~he proper~y aqaJngt which made until paid; and Thales Delorenzi & Lot 22, Block 348 of Marcc Beach $245.00 Patricia Campelo Unit 10, a Subdivision according 2407138 0R: 2490 PG: 2368 Patricia Ca~p,lo 9733 Arbor Oaks Lanm Apt ~304 Boca Raton, ~ 33428 ~NCE 80610-059 ~57872480005 LIEH HUM~ER: RESOLUTION NO. 98- &/46 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF '7HR ABATEMENT OF PDBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINanCE 91-47. WHEREAS, the cost th<.reof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Comr, issioners, together W}{EREAS, such assessme~t shall be a ]ega!, valid and binding obli~jation upon the property against which ~ade u~ti] paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable thirty days after ~he mailing of Notice of Ass,~ssment after which interest unpaid portion thereo[. COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and the following costs of such abatement, to wit: Phillip Pierre Lot 15, block 223, ~EN $245.00 Naples, ~ 34116 s~division according to in Plat Book 9, Pages 1 through 7, of the P~lic Records of Collier County, ~$FERENCE: 80708-124 ~36384480006 The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days hereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official according to law, unless such directicn is stayed by this Board upon This ,Keso!u~ion adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: N0~ ~ ~ DWIGHT E. BROCK, ~ %o FO M 2407139 0R: 2490 PG: 2370 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI$SIONER~ LEGA~ NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN ~E: NOV ~ Phillip Pierre 1894 -40~ Terrace SW Naples, FL 34116 REFERENCE 80708-124 #36384480006 LiEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCP!PTiOH: Lot 15, block 223, GOLDEN GATE, Unit 6, Part 1, a subdivision according to the plat there of as recorded in Pl~,t Book 9, Pages 1 through 7, of the Public Records of Collier Cou',ty, Florida. You, as the owner of the property above described, mq recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Compliance Services Manager, did on 7/10/98, order the abatement of a certain nuzs.%nce existing con the above property prohibited by Ordinasce !~i-47, ser.;lnrj not~c:e thereof i:pon you, such nuisance being: Prohibited accumulation of non-protected mowable vegetation in excess of 18" in height in a subdivision other than Golden Gate Estates. Weeds over 18". ad~,inistratiTe cost of $200.00 [or a total of $ 245.00. Such costs, by Florida, Bave been assessed against the abov( property on ~,~ and shall become a lien on the property thirty (30) days after such hearing must be made to the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, Government Center, Naples, Florida 34112 in writing within thirty (30) CSce 9- 1/93 RESOLUTION NO. 98- 4&7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COI~TY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDiNaNCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description o[ said parcel; and as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessmegt of lien to the owner or o'~/ners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days .&ereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER CO~TY, FLORIDA xt~e'~C as to Ch~l~'S BARB~ B. BERR~-~MXC~k ~D LEGAL / , x 2407140 0R: 2490 PG: 2372 COLLIER CO~Y, mOP,DA 1 ~ ,f ~ DATE: NOV Edward J & Laverda L Pelc 1307 N Kankakee St Lincoln IL 62656 REFERENCE 80709-064 #35690600005 LIEN NUMBER: Florida, have been asse$.~e~ against the above property on RESOLUTION NO. 98- 4~8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made ,,ntil paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annuln on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY CO.~ISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NA/4E: LEGAL DESCRIPTION; ~Q~T Valentin & Migdalia Gonzalez Lot 41, Block 6, Nap]es ~nor $305.00 1237-39 NW 33=d St Lake, according to the plat Miami, FL 33142 thereof, on file and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, Plat Book3, Page 86 also described as Lot 41, Block 6, Naples Manor Lake Replat, Plat Book 4, page 6?, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. REFERENCE: 80413-061 #62255200004 The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessm.%nt of lien to the owner or owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails tc pay such assessment within thirty (30) days hereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such direction is stayed b/ this Board upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This ~Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATBD: t~OV ~0 ATTEST: ' ; BOARD OF CO~TY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER co~rY, FLORIDA BAROCA B B~RRY/ C~ [~ T0 2407141 0R: 2490 PG: 2374 ~D LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: BOARD OF COUNT~ COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO~I~?T~, ~J.~RIDA 1 LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN NOV 1 [~ 19g~ Valentin & Migdalia Gonzalez 1237-39 NW 33=d St Miami, FL 33142 ~EFE~ENCE 80413-061 #62255200004 LiEN :IUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTiOH: Lot 41, Block 6, Naplee Manor Lake, according to the plat thereof, on file and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, Plat Book 3, Page 86 also described es Lot 41, Block 6, Naples Manor Lake Replat, Plat Book 4, page 67, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. recordsma'-'a,-j . , ~ b7 ....... ~ ~r~c_~ of the Property Appraiser, are hereby adyised that th-, Zimpiiance Ser~zices Manager, did on 04/13/98, order the Prohibited d~ing, acc~ulation, storage or burial of litter, waste or ~andoned property. administrative '~,r)t of $200.00 for a total of $ 305.00. Such costs, by Florida, ~av~ r.~or ~ssesse~a ~-~ ..... ...... tr, e abo-ze property on /]o)./o//)~and shall become a i;er on the [}roperty thJrt'/ ' ~0} days after such 16A4 * RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUN~f COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORD/~;CE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47, WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nui~tances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be sssessed against such property; and ~EREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be The C1,;rk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien to the owner or owners of the above described prope~-ty, and if such owner fails to pay such ass(~ssment within thirty ',30) days )ereof, a certified copy ~f this Resolution shall be recorded in the official accordin9 to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This ~e~olut]on adopted after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: '*--' '~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA t~it b%to, Chairman's BAR~A~ B. BERRY? o,n sn 2407142 0R: 2490 PG: 2376 COLLIER COUNTy, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN administratlv,; co:it of $200.00 [or d total of $ 245.00. Such costs, by ~ Ftorida, h,'~v,, ll~t,,rl ,~ssess-d against the above propers!, on ~0~ ~ 0 ~ should not constitute a lien against the property. Such request for RESOLUTION NO. 98-__~ A RESOLUTION OF TRE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THK ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WIT}{ ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as p:ovided in Ordiilance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, tke cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and [.ayable thirty (30) The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien to the owner cr owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30} days hereof, a certlfled cop}' of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien acainst st ch property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majolity vote. ~A~zr: NOV ! 019~ ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA / '' B~B~ B. BE~RY, ~I~ ALL~% as LO 2407143 0R: 2490 PG: 2378 DAVID WEI~EL BOItRD OF COUNTy COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTy, ]~r~ORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSML~NT OF LIEN DATE: Box 6591 Station J Ottawa Ontario Canada K2B 3Y7 P~EFERENCE 80413-065 #36561280003 LiEN LEGAL DESCRIPTI©H: Lot 14, Block 281, Unit 8, Part 2, GOLDEN GATE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 9, Pages 107 thrcug'a 112, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. c_.c .... u as reco:ded in the records maintained by the ~=~- of o.L~e the Property Appzalser, 3~e hereby advised that the Compliance Services [.lanager, did on 04/16/98, order the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance 91-47, serving no~ice thereof upon you, such nuisance being: Prohibited accumulation of non-protected mowable vegetation in excess Of 18" in height in a subdivision other than Golden Gate Estates. Weeds over 18". expenditure o~ ~u~iic funds at a direct cost of $ 45.00 and administrative cc!~ of $200.00 for a total of $ 245.00. Such costs, by Resolution of th~ i~oard o~ County Commissioners of C~llier CouRty, Florida, hate bee:, assesse:! eqaznst the above property on NOV 1019~ RESOLUTION NO. 98-%~I A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR T}~E COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WBEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incur:ed by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together w~[h a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and ~ayabie thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annum on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAJ~E: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COST Gary L & Nancy C Seward Lot 17, Block 50, 14~CO $245.00 830 Bebout B~ACB,~NIT ~WO, a Subdivision, Venetia, PA 15367 according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 6, Pages 25 through 31, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. REFERENCE: 60522-087 #56792000003 The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien to the owner or owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days hereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collie~ County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such directicn is stayed by this B,~ard upon This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: ATTEST: BO~D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, ?CLERK COLLIER CO~TY, FLORIDA ~D LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: 2407144 0R: 2~90 PG: 2380 ~OLLI~ ~O~, ~O~DA 1 6~ LEC~ NOTICE OF ASSESSN~NT OF LIEN DATE: NOV X O Florida, have beer, assesse~: against the above propertI on NOV 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98-452 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COI~4ISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WBEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and ~HEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together wi_.. a description o[ said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property agaiDst which made until paid; and ~HEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent {12.0%) per annum on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COST Lloyd G Sheehan Lot 16, Block 6, NAPLBS MANOR $245.00 2626 Tamiami Trl E #7 ADDITION, according to the Naples, FL 34112 plat thereof, on file and recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Page Book 3, Pages 67 and 68. REFERENCE: 80514-028 ~62094080003 The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien to the owner or owners of the above described property, and :.f such owner fails to ~*ay such assessment within thirty (30) days h ~reof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against suc~ property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~.~ERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER CO~TY, FLORIDA ~¢~' To SORM ~D ~mG~ su~zczm~cw: 2407145 0R: 2490 PG: 2382 COLLIER COUNT~, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN Lloyd G Sheehan P. EFEP. ENCB 80514-028 ~62094080003 LiEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESC?IPTION: Lot 16, Block 6, NAPLES MA/~OR ADDITION, according to the plat thereof, on file and recorded in the Public Record.s of Collier County, Flori~. Page Book 3, Pages 67 and 68. 'You, as the owner of the property above described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, ~re hereby advised fha% the Compliance Services Manager, did on 05/14/98, order the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance 9!-47, serving notice thereof upon you, such nuisance being: Prohibited accumulation of non-protected mowa]Dle vegetation in excess of 18" in height in a subdivision other than Golden Gate Estates. Weeds over 18". You failed to abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the e×pendi~ure of public funds at a direct cost of $ 45.00 a~d administra~iue cosz of $200.00 for a total of $ 245.00. Such costs, by Resolution of the Board of County Co~missioners of Collier County, Florida, have been assessed against the above property on and shall become ~ lien on the property thirty {30) days afte~ such Governmen5 Center, Naples, Florida 34112 in writing within thkrty (30) CSce 9- 1/93 RESOLUTION NO. 98.453 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF BUBLIC NUIS~%NCE, iN ACCORD;uNCE WITH ORDI1UdqCE 91-47. ',7{EREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cosl~ %he':eof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Com~,issioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS. such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHERE., the assessment shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annum on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF CO~TY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER CO~TY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: N~: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~OST Co~ie Simon Lot 24, Block 4, ~ED P~T $245.00 ~rlo Pikul OF NAPLES ~OR EXT~SION. 5352 Treetops Dr according to the plat thereof, Naples, FL 34113 of record in Plat Book 3. Page 101. of the P~lic Records of Collier Cowry, Florida. REFERENCE: 80622-009 ~62201760006 The Clerk of the Board shall mail a no~ice of assessmen~ of lien to the owner or owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days ]ereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the cfficlal records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against su~'h property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vo~e. DATED: ~ov ~ 0 ~ ATTEST: BOARD OF COL~TY COMMISSIgNERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest'as ~ ~an's ~D./LEGAL/SUF~JCIENCY:7, 2407146 0R: 2490 PG: 2384 COLLIER COU~T~, FLORIDA I 61 ~ ~lo ~i~u~ N0¥ ~ 0 1~98 You, as %he owner cf ~he :~roperty above described, a recorded in the records r~alntalned ?,. the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Comgliance Services Manager, did on 06/22/98, order the ...... aln nuisance existing On the above property prohibited by Ordinance 91-47, serving notice thereof upon you, such nuisance being: ~ Prohibited accu~nulation of non-protected mowable vegetation in O excess of 18" in height in a subdivision other than Golden Gate ~.~ You failed to a~ate such n~sance; whereupon, it was abated by the ~'~ expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of $45.00 and administrative ~ cost of $200.00 for a total of $245.00. Such costs, by Resolution of the ~ Board of County Cor~missioners of Collier County, Flor~ ia, have been assessed a~3alnst the above property on ~OV ~ 0 ~9~ and sha.~ become e lien tn the property thirty (30) days after such You may request a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to show cause, if any, why the expenses and charges incurred by the County should not constitute a lien against the property. Such request for CSce 9- 1/93 RESOLUTION NO. 98- ~S& A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against sllch property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WBEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, vatid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and ~ayable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue ac a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per aunum on any uupaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper uotice thereof to the owner o~ said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COST Ralph & Graciela Terry Lot 34, Block 7, NAPLES ~IA~OR $245.00 Main Road Small Pedro EXTENSION, according to the Grand Cayman Plat thereof, recorded in British West Indie Plat Book 3, Page 101, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. REFERENCe: 80224-019 #62205680001 The Cle'~k of the Board shall mail a nctice of assessment of lien to the owner or owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days '~ereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such direction ~s stayed by this 2oard upon Thi~ Resolution adopteda~te~ ,' motion, second and majority vote. AtteSt ~s t0 Chaf~n'~ BARg~ B. .... 2407147 0R: 2490 PG: 2386 DATE: ~OV 1 (] 1998 R&lph & Graciela Terry Main Road Smell Pedro Grand Cayman British West India ~EFEBENCE 80224-019 #62205680001 LiEH NUMBER:- LEGAL DESCRiPTIOII: Lot 34, Block 7, NAPLES F~tNOR EXTENSION, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 101, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. records mainta:ned by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the .Compliance Services Manager, did on 02/24/98, order the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited excess of 18" in height in a subdivision other than Golden Gate Weeds over 18". Florida, have be~n ,Jssessed against the above propert,? onNo M£MORANDUM DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1995 TO: MAUREEN KENYON/CLERK OF COURTS CC: KATHY/DEPT OF REVENUE FROM: JULIE BELANGER/CODE ENFORCEMENT KE: RESOLUTION//98-455 PLEASE FIND ATTACHED A COPY OF THE RESOLUTION AND CHECK.. PLEASE PULL THIS RESOLUTION BEFORE IT GETS RECORDED THANKING YOU IN ADVANCE, JUI_IE BELANGER/CODE ENFORCEMENT I~.-f~.5-i~J98 9;57At4 FRO~4 941403234S, P. 2 16A6 RESOLUTION NO. 98- 4~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF CO~TY COI<r4ISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESS~4ENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEI4ENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs o~ abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and .......... ~ ....... ~,se~ren shall be a legal, valid and binding 80226-050 ~38453161005 certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in th~ official according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon ~tt~=t a~'to Chairman's EARBSRA B. ~ERRYF C~A~R~ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE: ,~es R Colo.~o TR NOV ~ 0 C/O Naples Realty Services Inc. 4099 Tamiami Trl N Naples, FL 34103 REFERENCE 80226-050 #38453161005 LIEU [IU~B~R:'Z - LEGAL ~,,r.~ ~ All of Tract 45, Unit 35, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 85, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. · ~n .~.. the ~,fflce of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised '_hat the Compllanco Services Manager, did on 02/26/98, order the Prohibited dumping, accumulation, storage or burial of litter, waste Kitchen sink, 2 lawn chairs, camper shell, mattresses, auto shell, sinking canoe, bottles, paper, plastic, & etc. expend/ture of ?Jblic furlds at a direct cost of $ 475.00 and administrative cost of $200.00 for a total of $ 675.00. Such costs, by CLERK, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CSce 9- 1/93 RESOLUTION NO. 98-45fi A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF CO~gTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annum on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COb~TY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COST Ivan Magana Lot 10, Block 125, Unit 4, $390.00 229 Nans~ond A.rch GOLDEN GATE, according to Norfolk, VA 23503 plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 110, of the Pl~blic Records of Collier County, Florida. REFERENCE: 80302-052 #36116200001 The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien to the cwner or owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days hereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorde] in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Bcard upon appeal of the assessment cf the owner. This'Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. t ov 1 1998 ATTEST: BOARD OF COU~NTy COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT._ E. BROCK., .CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ,/ . . 2407148 0R: 2490 PG: 2388 LEGA~ NOTICE OF ASSESS~fENT OF LIEN DATE: 229 Nansemond Arch Norfolk, VA 23503 REFEP. ENCE 80302-052 #36116200001 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Block 125, Unit 4, GOLDEN GATE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 110, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner cf the property above described, as recorded in the records maintained by the 9ffice of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Compliance Services Manager, did on 03/04/98, order the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance 91-47, serving notice thereof upon you, such nuisance being: Accumulation of prohibited exotics on unin=proved land located within 200' of improved, subdivided property· You failed to abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of $ 190.00 and administrative co~t of $200.00 for a total of $ 390.00. Such costs, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier Count}', Florida, have beeF; assesse,: aqainst the above propert,, on ~0~ 1 0 ~0{~ a~d shall become a lien IF; th~ property thirty (30) days after such You may request a hearing he~ore the Board of County Com~niss!.oners to show Cause, if -~ny, why the expenses and charges incurred by the County under this Or~ina:~ce are unwarranted or excessive or why such expenses should not constitute a lien auainst~"h~ property. Such request for hearing must be made to the Clerk of the Board of Co~]r~ty Commissioners, CLERK, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CSce 9- 1/93 RESOLUTION NO. 98457 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description Of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, va]id and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and ~yable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) pe~ annum on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, TREREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NA~E: LEGAL DEBCRIPTION: COST Rodney Bushnell Lot 10, Block 50, MARCO BEACH ~IT $245.00 164 N Walnut St TWO, a Subdivision, according to Hinckley, IL 60520 the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 6, Pages 25 through31, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. REFeReNCE: 80316-040 #56791720009 Th° Clerk of ~he Board shall mai] n no,:ice of assessment of lien to the owner or owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days ~ereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this fQard upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Aq~EST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT £. BR~CK, CLERK COLLIER CO~TY, F~RIDA BERRY~~ 2407149 0R: 2490 PG: 2390 LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSM]~NT OF LIEN DATE: Ro~.y B~sh~.l~ NOV ! 0 19g,q 164 N Walnut St Hinckley, IL 60520 ~EFERENCE 80316-040 #56791720009 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRiPTi©H: Lot 10, Block 50, MARCO BEACH UNIT TWO, a Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 6, Page~ ;:5 through 31, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner · the property above described, as recorded in the records maintaine~! by the office of the Property Appraiser, {re hereby advised that the Compliance Services Manaqe~, did on 03/23/98, order the administratzve ,:~' 0£ $200.00 for ~ total of $ 245.00. Such costs, by ~ Florida, have been assesse~ against the above oroperty on ~OV ~ 0 ~ 2102 H. HORSESHOE hi~P~.E $, FLOPJD~ )4104 P'n~4 1 (941) 403-23~0 ~) Urgent {'~ For Review {~ Please Comment [] Pleege Reply L) Please ReGy©le ..-~ . ~-~ ~ · t ~,bv ~ '98 I$:51 ~L03103 :' i I Official Receipt - Collier County Board of Counfy Commissioners CDPR110:3 - Offici~sl Race,pi Traea Number [ Dale ' Poll (Jate .... l'Payment Slip Nbr 110S908 t ~'/25/1g~8 3:42:02 ,PM It 11~25_//1..99_8. ...... -' ] §,~' 4SERO' - .--, TAMAYO. ESTEBAN Peyo~: SA Fee Information ['F~4;' ~_.~:~'~- [ ~ ~} ~ t,on ........................ ! ~;~'A,.~r~i Amount [WaNed '~~OW..~~ ......... ~ 1T~[~14343908~0 j $24500 j "' Tolal ~, . $245,~ ~ Payments r~yF-me~nl C°d~ ~nuCheck Number CK ,398 . [ .... ToI~ Cash Tolal Paid Memo: FOLIO ~573~24~6 RESOL~ION ~98-4~ -- CA~E ~323-161 PAID PRIOR TO ~EING RECORDED · CK ~388 C;s~hier/Iocation: TEP, iLLA_J / 1 User: ARLO]-rA_K Colt*er Co~'tly Boar~ o¢ Cr~.unty Commieeiur~®¢e Drintod:l 1/25/1998 3;42:30 PM CD.Plul Iof WlndOWl 95/NT RESOLUTION NO. 98-459 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC ~ISANCE, IN ACCORD~2gCE WITH ORDIN~4CE 91-47. WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance 91-47, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board o[ County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and ?ayable thirty (30) days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest shall accrue at a rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annum on any unpaid portion thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CObLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed the followin~ costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~Q$? Esteb&n T~-yo Lot 13, Block 258, MARCO $245.00 441 NW 40=n Ct BEACH UNIT 6, a subdivision Miami, FL 33126 according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 6 at Pages 47 through 54, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. REFERENCE: 80323-161 ~57396240006 The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien to the owner or owners of the above described property, and if such owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days hereof, a certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon appeal of the assessment of the owner. This ~esolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA / " '' BAR~PJ~'~: ~RY,~~ S~R~Zf5]~S TO FORM ~ LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: , / , / .~ , CO~TY ATTORNEY CSce 11 - 1/98 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIE}; Esteban T~mayo 441 NW 40~ Ct Miami, FL 33126 REFERENCE 80323-161 #57396240006 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 13, Block 258, MARCO BEACH UNIT 6, a subdivision according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 6 at ]~ages 47 through 54, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner of the property above described, a.~ recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Complianc~ Services Manager, did on 03/23/98, order the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance 91-47, serving notice thereof upon you, such nuisance being: Prohibited acc%unulation of non-protected mowable vegetation in excess of 18" in height in a subdivision other than Golden Gate Estates. Weeds over 18". You failed to abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the expenditure of pu~ilc funds at a direct cost of $ 45.00 and administratlve cost of $200.00 for a total of $ 245.00. Such costs, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of C~llier County, florida, i.a'.'e :~,~:~ ~ssess,~: ~I~ th~ a~o','~ p:ope:~y o~ N0~ 101998 and shall become a ]~en on the property thirty (30) days after such You may request a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to show ca.~se, if any, why the expenses and charges incurred ~y the County should not constitute a lien against the property. Such request for hearing must be made to the Clerk of the Board of County Cor~mi. ssioners, Government Center, Naples, ~lorida 34112 in writing within uhirty (30) days from the date of this assessment to be valid. CLERK, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CSce 9- 1/93 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement') is made and entered into this/~;~6, day of "~d-t~,,.,.J.~t.~y 1998 by and between COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as 'County') whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Administration Building, 3r'~ Floor, Naples, Florida 34112, and OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP, a Florida general partnership, and OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERHSIP Il, a Florida general partnership, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Developed) whose mailing address is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Ste. 200, Naples, Florida 34105. RECITALS: WHEREAS, Developer holds fee simple legal title to the real property (the 'Property") located in the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, said Property being described in Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, Developer represents that no obligation or undertaking hereunder is barred or prohibited by any contractual agreement with any other person or entity; and WHEREAS, THE State of Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT*) and County are desirous of making improvements to U.S. Highway 41 (Tamiami Trail North), from the vicinity of Gulf Park Drive north to Old U.S. 41 (C.R. 887), said improvements to include provision of a Right of Way Easement, for the widening of U.S. Highway 41, on a .385:l: acre portion of the Properly owned by Developer, more particuJ 3rly shown in Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and made a pad hereof (said .385::i: 3cre portion of the properly hereinafter referred to as the "Contribution"); and VVHEREAS, FDOT has informad Davaloper, tha Collier County MPO, and Collier County that in ord~ fo~ said widening Improvements to ba acceleratad in FDOT's adopted work program, the cooperation of adioining landownar$ is required and will result in substantial cost savingsl and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge that the Road Impact Fee Credits established under this agreement shall run with the Properly, shall be assignable by the Developer to any specific projects of the Developer in the County's road Impact Fee District One, and shall be reduced by the amount of the Road Impact Fee due for each building permit issued thereon, until all such Cledit has been exhausted; and WHEREAS, County Road Impact Fee Ordinance No. 92-22, as amended, requires that the value of the Contribution shall be based upon an appraisal of fair market value; and WHEREAS, Developer has caused the fair market value of the Contribution to be appraised at $~0~70.0-..~ and County accepts the appraisal value of the Contribution, and both parties acknowledge that the value is derived from an analysis of comparable sales of similar propedies, between unrelated padJes in a bargaining transaction; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge Road Impact Fee credits shall be a credit only against Road Impact Fees, and that such Credils shall not offset, diminish or reduce any other charges, fees or other impact fees for which Developer is responsible in connection with the development of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Developer is willing to assist FDOT and tho County in accelerating the needed improvements in FDOT's work program in return for certain assurances by FDOT and County having to do with timing of the widening improvements and thai development of the Property can occur in accord with previous and future approvals of the County and that said 'Contribution" will qualify for Road Impact Fee Credits in accordance with County Road Impact Fee Ordinance No. 92-22, as amended, and other law, as further detailed herein; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan is in conformity wilh conlemplated improvements and additions to the transpodation network; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan, viewed in conjunction with other existing or proposed plans, will not adversely impact the cash flow or liquidity of any Road impact Fee Trust Account in such a say as to frustrate or inlerfere with other planned or ongoing growth necessitated capital improvements and additions ~o the transportation nmwork; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan, viewed in conjunction with mher exisling or proposed plans, will not create a detrimental imbalance between the arterial and colledor roadways; and WHEREAS, lhe proposed plan is consistent wilh the public interest; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge that the failure ol~ this Agreement Io address any permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve either party, or their successors, of the necessity of complying with any law, ord;nance, ru!e or regulation governing said permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions; and; WHEREAS, the padies to this Agreement acknowledge that the burdens and benefits of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the s,iccessors in interest to the parties to this Agreements; and 16B5 WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge that this Agreement is not to be construed as a development agreement under the Flodda Local Government Development Agreement Act. WITNESSETH; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and respective undertakings of the parties hereinafter set forth and the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable cor.~ideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by, between and among the parties as follows: 1. The recitals are true and correct and are herewith ~ncorporated as a part of this Agreement. 2. FDOT has requested and the Developer has delivered and FDOT has accepted the Contribution which consists of .385+ acres of land for a Right of Way Easement necessitated by the widening of U.S. Highway 41. Upon dedication of the Contribution, and recording of the Easement in the Public Records evidencing transfer of the conveyance, and acceptance of the dedication by FDOT, the County hereby agrees to grant to Developer Road Impact Fee Credits pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 92-22, as amended, for the fair market value of the acreage described herein in the amount set forth in Paragraph 6 hereof. 3. Developer shall provide FDOT with an attorney's of:!nion as to the record title holder of the Property, which opinion shall also idenlify any lienholder.,- having any lien or encumbrance affecting the portion of the Properly known as the Contlibution. 4. Developer shall convey to the FDOT, via Grant of Easement, the Contribution, more particularly described in Exhibit 'B" hereto. Said Easement has been delivered to the FDOT by the Developer, and a copy of the recorded Easement will be provided to the County by the Developer. 5. This Agreement shall be effective on the date it is executed by said Developer and the County. 6. Upon recording of the Easement, and acceptance of the dedication by FDOT, the Developer shall be entitled to a Road Impact Fee Crgdit in the amount of 7. Upon closing, until development of the Properly is completed, or until the balance of the Road Impact Fee Credit has been reduced to zero (0), the County shall apply portions of the road Impact Fee Credit toward the Road Impact Fees which the Developer is required to pay for each building permit which is applied for on the Property, or as provided in Paragraph 8 herein, reducing the balance of the Road Impact Fee Credit by the same amount due for each building permit so issues. 8. All Impact Fee Credits granted to either Developer hereunder shall be assignable in whole or in part to any successor or assign designated by said Developer, subject to credit application within road Impact Fee District One, as defined in Ordinance 92-22, Appendix B, as amended. In addition, such Impact Fee Credits may be used by Developer, its successor or assigns, for any land developmeqt project in Road Impact Fee District One. 16 5 m 9. County shall provide Developer with a certified copy of this Agreement, including ail exhibits altached hereto, such that Developer's certified copy of Exhibit "C" (Road impact Fee Credit Ledger), shall serve as the ledger sheet to document developer's balance of Road Impact Fee Credits. 10. This document incorporates all agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and the parties agree that there are no commilments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are no contained in this Agreement. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation of the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representation or agreements, whether oral or written, It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration of the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a wrilten document executed with the same formality, and of equal dignity herewith, 11. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the Laws of the State of Florida. 12. Upon written application made unto the County by the Developer, County shall, within sixty (60) days, refund to the Developer the Impact Fee Credit Balance. Said written application shall incIude a certification made by the Developer that all development subject to the payment of Road Impact Fees has been completed on the Property. The refund by County shall be disbursed as agreed between Developer and County based upon lhe Liquidity of Road Impact Fee District One and provided it does not adversely affect the cash flow of said Road Impact Fee District account; provided, however, notwithstanding Ihe foregoing, the refund shall be paid to Developer no later than five years from the date of Developer's application. Ctloo 6 16B5 { 13. County shall record this Agreement in the pub{lc records of Col{ier County, Florida, within 14 days of its execution by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. 14. Either party to this Agreement may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all other remedies available to the parties for enforcement of the Agreement. 15. This Agreement may be amended or canceled only by the mutual consent of the parties to the Agreement, or by their successors in interest. 16. This written Agreement, including ail exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, understandings, promises, warranties or covenants not contained herein. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same waiver, and each of which shall be deemed an original. · ,'-. IN'WITNeSS WHEREOF, the County and the Developer have caused this .,D~velop~r Contribb.[ion Agreement to be signed on the day and year first written above, ~TTEST: BOARD OF COUNT'( COMMISSIONERS ~,IGHT E. BROCK Clerk OF C~LI~R COUNTY/;hFL~IDA BY: ' ~tte~t'a~ ~ ~l'rma~'$ 2al suf ficten~y :. ~'~[tdi F. Asht~n' ~Assistant County Attorney This Developer Contribution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterparts have been signed, this Developer Contribution Agreement shall be deemed fully signed by all U3e parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD in the Presence of: PARTNERSHIP, a Flodda General Partnership Withess ~ Lama'r Gable; as a Partner of Ocean DORIS J, LEWIS Boulevard Partnership Print Name /(~ . V~tness GAJL W. ANDERSON Print Name STATE OF COUNTY OF (~(h--¢r'- ~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this q~"'/"-- day of tL4J--n~;~'~ , 1998, by Lamar Gable, as a Partner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership, a Florida general partnership. He is E~rsonall¥ known to me or has produced as identification.~ (Notary Seal) Nora Printed Name: This Developer Conb'ibution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterparts have been signed, this Developer Contribution Agreement shell be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Si9ned, Sealed end Oelivered OCEAN BOULEVARD in the Presence of: PARTNERSHIP. a Florida General Prances G. ~ller~, as a Partner of W~tnes,,.~l/.~l.]~ /,/h~'(,/,~ Ocean Boulevard Partnership Pdnt N e Witness t,j -DORIS J. LEW:S Print Name STATE OF COUNTY OF C...¢,~.~,~:~. _.~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ?~ day of ~¢. , 1998, by Frances G. Vi,ere, as a Partner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership, a Florida general partnership. She is pe.rsonall~' known to me or has produced as identification. Notary Printed Name: ,~-C~/~ This Developer Contribution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, ~eparately by each party. When all such counterparts have been signed, this Developer Contribution Agreement shall be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD in the Presence of: PARTNERSHIP, a Flodda General Withess Barron Collier III, as a Partner of Ocean DORJ,.~ J. LEWI~ Boulevard Partnership Print Name J~ V~thess GAlL W. ANDERSON Print Name STATE OF COUNTY OF ~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me [his '7'/'5'~.. day of d."f~,~ , 1998, by Barron Collier Ill, as a Padner of O~ean Boulevard Partnership, a Flodda general partnership. He is P__~sonally known to rqe .or has produced as identifica~n. (Notary Seal) Notary (j Prin[ed Name: This Developer Contribution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterpads have been signed, this Develop.ar Contribution Agreement shall be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD in the Presence of: PARTNERSHIP, a Flodda General ~-'b~' t ~'~'~ ~"~,._..,)z',~. ~Partnershl° ..,/ // W~tness ~-~e~ C. Sprou[, as-a P~'rther of Ocean rw~o ~ ~ ~.o Boulevard Partnership Print Name ,/~ ·--.';'-,7~'-'.'"-' V~thess GNL W. ANDERSON Print Name STATE COUN-FY OF (~hf~ foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ?~' day of , 1998, by Juliet C. Sproul, as a Partner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership, a Florida general partnership. She is p..~rsonally known to me or has produced as identification. (Notary Seal) Notary ~/ Printed Name: -sec on 27, Iow0ship 48 ,.gouth, Ranqe 25 Eas~ ~ ~t~ 5 I~ A tract or parcel of land lying in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida which tract or parcel is described as follows: From the Northwesl corner of said Section 27 run S 00"02'33' W along the West line of said Section 27 and the East line of Tamiami Trail (Stale Road No. 45) for 125.02 feet to the South line of Immokalea Road (Sla~e Road No. 646) and the Poin~ of Beginning of Ihe herein des~ibed parcel. From said Point of Beginning run along said South line of Immokalee Road the following courses: N 45'28'51' E for 35.08 feet; S 89°04'03· E for 573.46 feet; S 86'12'18' E for 500.61 feet and S 89'04'03' E for 1.47.09 fee~; thence nJn S 00"02'33' W parallel with said Tamiami Trail for 1175.51 feet; thence run N 89'57'49" W for 1245.00 feet to said Easl line of Tamiami Trail; thence run N 00'02'33' E along said Easl line of TamJami Trail for 1194.98 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 3.4.36 acres, more or less. Bearings hereinabove mentioned are based on the centerline survey of Immokalee Road (State Road No. 646) and the North line of the Nodhwest quarter (NW-1/4) of Section 27, Township 48 Soulh, Range. 25 East bears S 89°04'03' E. and _Section 27, Township 48 South, Ranqe 25 East A tract or parcel of land lying in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida which tract or parcel is described as follows: From Ihe Northwest corner of said Section 27 run S 00°02'33" W along the West line of said Section 27 and the East line of Tamiami Trail (Slale Road No 45) for 12502 feet ~o the South line cf Immokalee Road (State Road No. 846); lhence run along said South line the roi!owing courses: N 45°28'51. E for 35.08 feet;. S 89"04'03" E for 573.46 feet; S 86°12'18· E for 50061 feet and S 89°04'03· E for 147.09 feet to Ihe Point of Beginning. From said Point of Beginning conlinue along said South line of Immokalee Road Ihe following COurses: S 89°04'03" E for 1108.51 feel; S 00°55'57" W for 10.00 feet; S 89°04'03" E for 150.19 feet to the West line of the Nodheast quarter (NE-l/4) of said Section 27; thence continue along said South line of Immokalee Road S 89°07'15· E for 716.81 feet to the East line of Florida Power and Light Company easemenl described in instrument recorded in Deed Book 30 at Page 27, Collier ~;ounty Records; thence run S 04°52'15" E along said East line for 1532.85 feet; thence run S 85"06'45" W for 100.00 feet to Ihe East line of a drainage easgment described in deed recorded in Official Record Book 682 al Page 1976, said Public Records; thence run S 04°53'15"E along said East lihe for 75.00 feet; thence run N 89°57'49" W for 3258.67 feet to said Eas~ line of Tamiami Trail; thence run N 00°02'33· E along said East line for 475.22 feet; thence run S 89°57'49" E for 1245.00 feet; thence run N 00"02'33" E for 1175.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 89.92 acres, more or less. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record. Bearings hereinabove mentioned are based on the centerline survey of Immokalee Road (State Road No. 846) and the North line of Ihe Northwest quarter (NW-1/4) of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East bears S 89° 04'03" E. less i 6BS, & All that part of Section 27, Township 48 Soulh, Range 25 East, Collier Courtly, Flodda being more padicularly described as follows: Commencing at the West ¼ corner of said Section 27; thence along said West line North 00'39'12" West 827.69 feet; . (hence leaving said line North 89°20'45· East 577.78 feet lo the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence North 57'47'59' East 46.92; Ihance Nodh 68'35'21' East 110.88 feet; thence Nodh 00'39'12" West 187.52 feet; thence Nodh 77'43'40" East 573.08 feet; thence South 72'59'03" East 785,48 feet; thence South 00'39'15" East 27.71 feet; thence Nodh 89'20'45" East 503.78 feet; thence South 00'39'15" East 100.64 feet; thence South 89'20'45" West 1957.22 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described. Containing 9,5 acres more or less, Bearings are based on the West line of said Section 27 as being Nodh 00°39'12· West and less A tract or parcel of land lying in the Nodh % of Seclion 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, which tract or parcel is described as follows: From the Norlhwest corner of said Section 27 run S 89°45'00" E along the North line of said Section 27 for 1868.13 feet; thence run S 00°15'00" W for 125.00 feet to a point on the Southerly righl.-of-way line of Immokalee Road (County Road 846) and the Poinl of Beginning of the herein described parcel. From said Point of Beginning run S 89'45'00" along the ssid Southerly right-of-way line of Immokalee Road for 487.33 feet; thence run S 00"15'00" W along the said Soulhedy right-of-way line of Immokalee Road for 10.00 feet; thence run S 89'45'00" E along the said Southerly right-of-way line of Immokalee Road for 150.19 feet; thence run S 89'48'16" E along the Southerly right-of-way line of Immokalee Road for 716.99 feet to a point on the Easterly line of the Florida Power and Light Company easement; thence run S 05'34'16" E along said westerly boundary of said Florida Power and Light easement for a distance of 75.00 feet; thence run S 89'22'44' W for a distance of 723.57 feet; thence run N°00'39'15 W for 100.64 feet; thence run S 89'20'45 W for 503.7~3 feet; thence run N O0° 39'15" Wfor 27.71 feet; thence run N 72'59'03" Wfor 127.88 feet; thence run N 02°19'57" W for 1474.24 feet to the Point of Beginning. Conta;ning 50.39 acres more or less, This instrument prepared by and when recorded return to: Lee Treadwel[ PAP, CEL B0 5 Ban'on Colller Company SECTION 2640 Golden Gate Parkway, Ste. 115 STATE ROAD 45 Naples, FL 34105 COUNTY TI-DSEASEIv[ENTmadethls J~'"-dayof ~U~-~ ,199~_,byOCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSI~, and OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP Il, a Florida general partnership, Grantor, to the STATE OF FLOR[DA DEPARTIvfENT OF TRANSPORTATION, its successors and assigns, Grantee, whose Fost o~ce address ~s: Post O~ce Box 1249, Bartow, FIorlda 33831-1249. V',qTNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar and other valuable considerations paid, the receipt and suMclency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, a Perpetual Easement for the purpose of constructing and maintaining outfalis and drainage facilities in, over, under, upon and through the £ollowing descrlbcd land in Collier County, Florida. viz: The Grantor reserve thc right to use the easement for the purposes of landscape buffering, landscape berm, waler management berm or wail. It will be the f~ll understanding that if the Department of Transportation needs to enter the property to inspect, repair or replace pipe, it is the Gran[or's responsibility to repair or replace any damage wid~in thc easement, SEE EXHIBIT "A" TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unlo aaid Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, and thc Grantor will defend the title to said lands against all persons claiming by, through or under said grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Granlor has causcd these presents to be executed in its name, thc day and year first above written : OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTN'ERSHIP. ' Signed, sealed Jind delivered in the presence of: Witness LI DOI~8 J. LEWIS Print n~n~e / . - MARC:IA d. WILHELM Print name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER i99~, by Juli~J C. Sproul. ~s pa~ncr o~OCEAN BO~EVAAD PAA~KSHIP.. ~ Florida~cner~lp~nnership, who is personally k~o~ lo mc. ~ ~y commission expires: Serial No OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP Il. 1 6 B 5 a Florida limiled pannership Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: By: Witness k~ Lam net DORIS J. LE~ Print name . Witness Prim name STATE OF FLOP~DA 199~. by Lamer Gable. as general panner oFOCEAN BO~EVARD II.. a Florida 1~ pa~nership, who is personally knownS. I~ ~"Xl' ~ ~,,Dx~ ~me: ~ LYNN D. STIRP / ] M~,~¢ ~'. *~.~.~/ Nola~ Public ;n and for the County and Serial CITRUST, a Louisiana Pannershlp. as a Partner Of Ocean Boulevard Pannership II Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Witness Christopher [5. ViUere, a~ a Panner DORIS J,J..F__~d,S~ nr Citrusl Witness ~ ~C~ J. ~ Print name ST^TE OF FLOIUDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The ~)~'¢§oin§ ins,ru men, w,s ,cknowl,d~,d bcror, m, ,his~day of~ , lgg~,, by Christopher D. Villcr*. as a Panner ofCitmsl., a Lomstana pannership, who is personally known 1o (Seal) v LYNN D. STIRP I ~ ~.~l~ I Nola~ Public in and [or the County and My commission expires: Serial No. SPROUL PARTNERSHIP. a Florida general Pannership. as a Partner of Ocean BoolevRrd Pannership I1 Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence Witness Ju~C. Sproul. as ~RIS J l FWIS ofSproul Pannership nt namr Witness Print name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNT",' OF COLUER The~f~'egoln~ inslrumenl w~s ack nowledged before me 99 , by Juhu C. Sproul ~s a Panner of Sproul Pa~nersh~ ) a Florida ,eneral pannersh~p, who ~s personally known ~o me. ~~x~g~ ' J LYNND ~ v St~le I~sl a~or~s~id My commission expires: Serlal No BARRON G. COLLIER IV IRP~VOCABLE TRUST. Si~ned, sealed and delivered in lhe presence o~: ~ Juli~-C~'SprouL at tmste~ -/ -- ~Vilness DORi ~S.)j. LEWIS Print name . . ; / ~ Wi n~s~ ~ J. W Prin~ name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The,~reBoinB instrument was acknowledged before me ~his L~d~y or Igg..~, by Juliet C. Sproul, as tn.~s~ee of Barron Collier IV Irrevocable Trusl. who is Nolary Public in and fnr Jhe Couu. ly and State last ~roresaid My commission expires: Serial No. Signed, sealed and delivered in ~he presence Witness DORIS 3, LEWIS .l,~._,rint name . ~llt name ':'"-L, oy Juhet C Sproul, as truslee oFAlexandra Eden Coi~J:rre(ocable Trust who is personally known to me. NOT,/~Y ~JUC S'rATt Or Ft.Oi~D^ cot~4ts~aN NO. cc:~r~0~ . ~¥ COU..~StON ~?. ^UC. ~4,~ Nolary Public in and for d~e Counly and SJ2le last ~£oresaid g'ly commlssJon expires: Serial No. LARA CHRISTINA COLLIER IRREVOCABLE TRUST. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence o~ DOPdS J. LEWI.S .......... ~,,..,..s Iruste~ o' ' Witn~ 6.' ROIA d. WILHELM Prlnl name sT^'rE o~ ~O~D~', 1 COUNTY OF COLLIER The f~egoing inst~ment was .cknowledged before me h s Ig9~.byJuielC Sproul as m~s~eeofL~ra ~.:..' ~..;~__,, ,. ' -.,,,,a,na ~.omcr Irrevocable Tmsl. who L_ L~ D S~ ~¢~.~ ~ LYNN D. S~RP L~[~ ~. F~j~j Nota~ Public in and for the Courtly and Slale lasl aforesaid My commission expires: . Serial No. , SECTION 03010-2568 PARCEL 805 That portion of the northwest ¼ of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Being described as follows: co~ence at the northwest corner of said Section 27; thence along ths west line of said Section 27, South 01'00'44,, East a distance of 124.94 feet to an intersection with the easterly existing right of way line of State Road 45 (US 41) per Florida Department of Transportation right of way map Section 03010-2250 and the southerly existing right of way line of Immokalee Road (per Official Records Book 1747, Page 2291, as recorfed in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida) for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along said southerly existing right of way line of Immokalee Road North 44'26'17" East a distance of 14.04 feet; thence leaving said southerly existing right of way line South 01'00'44,, East a distance of 1,680.15 feet; thence South 88'59'16,, West a distance of 10.00 feet to said easterly existing right of way line; thence along said easterly existing right of way line North 01'00'44" West a distance of 1,670.30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 16,752 square feet. Lega~ Descr.~ption Approved by: ~. 'A. Kys~YP.L.S. J4366 Date: -Jd/J~/~, /~9~ NOT VALID ~LESS/EMBOSSED EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 ~ al~J~n~{l'l lh(s Rold Impact Fem Crodtt LodgQr is tn~.mndm}t Jo document tho DEGIIIUIHaDAI.AIICE ................ · , ~ m DATE NO. FEES DUE C"ED1T .' $ '~' DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the ~Agreemenl~) is made and entered into IhJs day of ,1998 by and between COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as 'County') whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail Fast, Administration Building. 3f'~ Floor, Naples, Florida 34112. and COLLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. a Florida corporation, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred lo as 'Developer') whose mailing address is 3003 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, Florida 34103. WHEREAS. Developer holds fee simple legal title to thc real property (the 'Troperty') located in the unincorporated area of Collier County. Florida, said Property being described in Exhibit ~A'; and WIIEREAS, Developer represents that no obligation or undertaking hereu~fer is barred or prohibited hy any contractual agreement with any other person o~ entity; and WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") a~ County are desirous of making improvements to U.S. Highway 41 (Tamiami Trail North), from the vicinity of Gulf Park Drive north to Old U,S. 41 (C.R, 887), said improvements to include provision of a water management detention area, for the widening of U.S. ttJghway 41, on a +2 ante portion of the Property owned by Developer, more particularly shown in Exhibit 'B' which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (said +2 acre portion of the property hereinafter referred to as the "Contribution'); and 1 WHEREAS, FDOT has informed Developer, the Collier County MPO, and Collier County that in order for said widening improvernents to be accelerated in FDOT's adopted work program, the cooperation of adjoining landowners is required and will result in substantial cost savings; and WHEREAS, the panics to this Agreement acknowledge that the Road Impact Fee Credits established under this Agreemenl shall mn with the Property. shall be assignable by the Developer to any specific projects of the Developer in the County's Road Impact Fee District One, and shall be reduced by the amounl of the Road Impact Fee due for each building permit issued thereon, until all such Credit has been exhausted; and WHEREAS, County Road Impact Fee Ordinance No. 92-22, as amended, requires that the value of the Contribution shall be based upon an appraisal of fair market value; and WHEREAS, Developer has caused the fair market value of the Contributiou to be appraised at $130,000.00 and County accepts Ihe appraisal value of the Cor~tr5bution, and both parties acknowledge that the value is derived from an analysis of comparable sales of similar properties, between unrelated parties in a bargaining transaction; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge Road Impact Fee Credits shall be a credit only against Road Impact Fees, and that such Credits shall not offset, diminish or reduce any other charges, fees or other impact fees for which Developer is responsible in connection with the development of the Property; aM WHEREAS, the Developer is willing to assist FDOT and the County in accelerating the needed improvements in FDOT's work program in return for certain assurances Dr. FDOT and County having to do with timing of the widening improvements and that development of the Property can occur in accord with previous and future approvals of the County and that said 5. This Agreement shaft be effective on the date il is executed by said Developer and Ibe County. 6. Upon recording of the deed and acceplance of Ihe dedication by FDOT, the Collier Development Corporation shall be entilled to a Road Impact Fee Credit in the amount of ONE ftUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($130,000.00). 7. Upon closing, until development of the Property is completed, or until the balance of'the Road Impact Fee Credit has been reduced to zero (0), the County shall apply portions of the Road Impact Fee Credit toward the Road Impact Fees which Ihe Developer is required to pay for each building permit which is applied for on Ihe Property, or as provided in Paragraph 8 herein, reducing the balance of tbe Road hnpact Fee Credit by the same amount due for each building permit so issued. 8. All Impact Fee Credits granted to either Developer hereunder shall be assignable in whole or in part ~o any successor or assign designated by said Developer, subiect to credit application wilhin Road Impact Fee District One, as defined in Ordinance 92-22, Appendix B, as amended. In addition, such Impact Fee Credits may be used by Developer, its successor or assigns, for any land development project in Road Impact Fee Dislrict One. 9. County shall provide Developer with a certified copy of this Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, such that Developer's certified copy of Exhibit "C ~ (Road Impact Fee Credit Ledger), shall serve as the ledger sheet to document Developer's balance o[ Road Impact Fee Credits. I0. This document incorporates all agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject maner of this Agreement that are not contained in this 5 Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation of the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representation or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration of the terms or conditions contained herein: shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality, and of equal dignity herewith. I I. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the Laws oftbe State of Florida. 12. Upon written application made unto the County by the Developer, County shall, ;¥ilhin sixty (60) days, refund to the Developer the Impact Fee Credit Balance. Said written application shall include a certification made by the DeveIoper that all development subject to the payment of Road Impact Fees has been completed on the Property. The refund by County shall be disbursed as agreed between Developer and County based upon the Liquidity of Road Impact Fee District One and provided it does not adversely affect the cash flow of said Road Impact Fee District account; provided, however, notwilhstanding the foregoing, the refund .hall be paid to Developer no liner than five years from the date of Developer's application. 13. County shall record this Agreement in the public records of Coltier County, Florida, within 14 days of its execution by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. 14. Either party to this Agreement may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreemem, said remedy being cumulative with any and all other remedies available to the parties for enforcement of the Agreement. 15. This Agreement may be amended or canceled only by the mutual con.~ent of the parties to the Agreement, or by their successors in interest. 16. This written Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no 7riot or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, understandings, promises, warranties or covenants not contained herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Developer have caused this Developer Contribution Agreement to be signed on Ihe day and year first written above. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: WITNESSES: COLLIER DEVELOPMENT ~ ~__~ CORPORATION, a Florida corporation sig e, --- By: JE~REY ¢<I'~ ~}C.v[~p~ ,..~- ~ Vice Preseent Printed Name Primed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing In~tmmem. was acknowledged ~fore me this ~[~day of i~8, by Jeffrey M. B~rr as Vine-President of Collier Development Co.ration, ~ Florida' co~oration, lfe is personally known to mc or who has pr~uced ~ as identification. (Affix Seal) Sig~mre of No[a~blic ~ ~ ~x~C~ t~N ~ Printed Name of Nota~ ~ ~ ~ CC 640455 Co~ission No ' ~[ ~O'~ · ~ . 'A~T: ~ / :¢~:" BO~OFCO~CO~I~IO~ ~ DWIGHT E. BRO~'/'Clerk OF COLLIER CO~TY, FLORIDA lgflllure, on Approved ~ m fo~ ~ Heidi F. Asht~n Assistant County Attorney EXttlB1T "A" PARCEL NO. 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE NORTH 89°50'30" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TIIE SOUTItEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SAID SECTION 21 FOR A DISTANCE OF 995.63 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 00009'30'' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITIt A LINE 100.00 FEET NORTItERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH TIlE SAID SOUI}tERLY LINE OF THE SOUIi~EAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION 21, THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF TIlE ItEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL NO. 1; THENCE NORTtt 89050'30'' WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1661.86 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITIt A LINE 30.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF TIlE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SAID SECTION 21; TIIENCE NORTH 01°32'23" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 440.86 FEET; TItENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 88°27'37" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH ]'lie SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTItWEST QUARTER (SW I/4) OF SECTION 21; THENCE NORTH 01 °32'23" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 890.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 89°51'48" WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1350.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WiTH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF (W V2) OF THE SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 21; TItENCE NORTH 01052'47.. WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 621.76 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 399.71 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF (lq ~) OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (S ½) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER ONW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE SOUTH 89°57'13" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1304.52 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 50.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 I, SAID LINE BEING THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD C-901; THENCE NORTH 02°1Y17" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1473.46 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 1752.45 FEET Page I of 4 SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NG~',.TH 89033'45" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1588.50 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WIT[t THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BULKHEAD LINE NO. 2 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I, PAGE I6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; TttENCE SOUTII 20°30'21" EAST ALONG SAID LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY, SOUTHEASTERLY, EASTERLY, NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE AND ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 157°43'50" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1101.17 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE: THENCE NORTHERLY, NORTHEASTERLY, EASTERLY, AND SOUTHEASTERLY CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE AND ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 124° 16'03" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1084.44 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTtt 53°58'08'' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 505.81 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH TIlE WESTERLY LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1355, PAGE 1011, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00°39'10" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1066.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAiD LANDS; THENCE NORTH 89°20'50" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID :.ANDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH TIlE WESTd, RLY LINE OF WALKERBILT ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 33, Pa. GE 279, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00°39'10'' EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTItERLY LINE OF SAID WALKERBILT ROAD; THENCE NORTH 89"20'50" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 600.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89021'48'' EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 731.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1219, PAGE 1672, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00043'07" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89021'48'' EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL (U.S. 41, S,R. 45); THENCE SOUTH 00°43'07" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1010,73 FEET; Page 2 of 4 THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTtt 89°50'30' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 442.82 FEET; TtlENCE SOUTIt 45°09'30'' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.26 FEET; TItENCE SOUTH 00°09'30'' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°09'30~ WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°09'30" WEST FOR A DISIANCE OF 390.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°09'30.' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 190.00 FEET; TItENCE SOUTH 00°09'30'' WEST FOP, A DISTANCE OF 338.00 FEET 'FO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 262.649 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. PARCEL NO. 2 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BL"ING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT TIlE NORTItEAST CORNER OF TIlE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE I/4) OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE SOUTII 89°50'41'' WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LIN E OF SAID SO UTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) FOR A DISTANCE OF 818.47 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 00°40'47" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.87 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH TIlE NORTHERLY' LINE OF WALKERBILT ROAD, THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF TIlE HEREIN DESCRIBE D PARCEL NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 89°21'48" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 356.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH TIlE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL (U.S. 41 - S. R. 45 ); TttENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 00°40'47'' WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 599.13 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTItERLY LINE OF BULKHEAD LINE NO. 3, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 16, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER. COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A NON-TANGENT CURVE FROM WHICIt THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 20°56'08" EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°0Y24~ FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 370.41 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITtt A NON-TANGENT LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITI! THE AFORESAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL (U.S. 41 - S. R 45); THENCE SOUTH 00°40'47" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 630.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; Page 3 of 4 CONTAINING 4.790 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. G:IUSERS~BET$ Y~Wp$~ ECI1ON 21~EX}I A TO DC A.~q~] Page 4 of 4 i ] Tha~ pot=ion o~ the northeast ~, of Section 21, T~W~Ship 4B South, ~lic Reoor~ o~ ~llf~ C~ty, Florida; ~ along ~d to ~e ~ OF BZG~G; co~inu~ ~nce along said ri~ of DEVELOPER'S ROAD IMPACT FEE CREDIT LEDGER IMPORTANT: This Road Impact F~e Credit Ledger is intended to documenl the balance cfi Road Impact Fcc Crcdhs applying ONLY to the fi~tlowing pmpe~y: PARCEL NO. 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 2 I. TO~SH1P 48 SOUTI1. ~NGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COLINTY. FLORIDA. SAID I'ARCEI. OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOI.LOWS: COMNIENCING Al' TIIE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE NORTH ~9~50'30'' WEST ALONG fftlE SOUTItERLY LINE OF TttE SOUTItEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SAID SEC FION 21 FOR A DISTANCE OF 995.63 FEET; TIIENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTtl 00009'30.' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF I00.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100.00 FEET NORTItERLY OF AND PA~LLEL WITI1 ~E SAID SOU'~tERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE I/4) OF SECTION 21, TIlE POINT OF BEGI~ING OF THE ffEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL NO. I; THENCE NORTH 89%0'~0" WEST ALONG SAID PA~LLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1661.86 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET EAS~RLY OF AND PARALLEl. WITI I TIfE EASTERLY I.INE OF TIIE fiOUTItWEST QUARTER (SW I/4) OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE NORTII 01~32'2Y' WEST AI,DNG SAID PA~M. LEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 440.86 FEET; TtIENCE EEAVING SAID PARAE[.EL EINE SOUTIt ~8°27'37' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION W1T[I TIlE SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TIlE SOUWtWEST QUARTER (SW [/4) OF SECTION 21; THENCE NORTtl 01~32'2Y' WEST ALONG SAID EASTEREY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 890.00 FEET; TttENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH ~9% 1'48" WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITIt TIIE SOUTItERI.Y LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1350.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH TIlE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WEST ONE-IIALF ~W %) OF TIiE SAID SOUTI1WEST QUAR'FER (SW I/4) OF SECTION 21; THENCE NORTll 01%2'47" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERI.Y LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 621.76 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITll A LINE 399.71 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEI. W[TII TIlE SOUTHERI.Y I.INE OF TilE NORTII ONE-IIALF ~ ~) OF ~IE SOUTIt ONE-IIALF fS V~) OF TIlE NORTttWEST QUARTER ~W I/4) OF TIlE SOUTIIWEST QUARTER [SW 1/4) OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE SOUTII 89%7'13" WEST ALONG SAID PA~LLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1304.~2 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITIt A I.INE 50.00 FEET EASTERLY OF PARALI.EL WITII THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 21, SAID LINE BEING TIlE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD THENCE NORT}] 07IYI7" WEST ALONG SAID RIGIIT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1473.46 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITll A LINE 1752.45 FEET SOUTHEREY OF AND PARALLEl. WITtt TIIE NORTttERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 21; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTtl 89~33'45'' EAST AI.ONG SAID PA~XLLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1588.50 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION W1TH TI IE SOUTItERLY LINE OF BULKHEAD LINE NO. 2 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1. PAGE 16 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER CO~TY, FLORIDA; ~ENCE SOUTIt 20%0'21" EAST ALONG SAID LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVA~RE; TttENCE SOU~tERLY, SOUTHEASTERLY. EAS~RLY, NORTHEAS~RLY AND } iOR~tERI.Y CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE AND ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, IfAVING A ~XDIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 157~43'50' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1101.17 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE NORTI]ERLY, NORTttEASTERLY. EASTERLY, AND SOUTtlEASTERLY CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE AND ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RAI)IUS OF 500.00 FEET, A CENT~L ANGLE OF 124~16'03'' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF I084.44 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTII 53~58'08'' EAST FOR A DISTANCE O~ 505.81 FEET TO AN Page i of 3 INTERSECTION W1Tll TIlE WESTERLY LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1355, PAGE 101 I, PUELIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; TttENCE SOUTtl 00°39'10' EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1066.03 FEET TO TIlE SOUTtfWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS; Tt IENCE NORTII §9°20'$0'' EAST ALONG TIlE SOUTltERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITtt TIlE WESTERLY LINE OF WALKERBILT ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 33, PAGE 279. PUBI.[C RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; TItENCE SOUTIt 00°39'10'' EAST ALONG SAiD WESTERLY i. INE FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO AN INTEl{SECTION \\'Il'Il TIlE SOUTltERLY LINE OF SAID WALKERBILT ROAD; TltENCE NORTH 89020'50.. EAST ALONG SAID SOUTIIERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 600.21 FEET; TItENCE NOR'I il 89°21'48'' EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAIl) SOUTItERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 731.07 FEET TO ]'lie NORTIIWEST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1219, PAGE 1672, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA: TItENCE SOUTII 00°4Y07'' EAST AI.ONG TIlE WESTERLY LINE OF SAIl) I.ANDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°21'48'' EAST ALONG TIlE SOUTIlERLY LINE tlF SAID LANDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITIt TIlE WES 7ERI.Y RIGIIT-OF-WAY LINF. OF TAMIAMI TIL'M L (U.S. 41, S.R. 45); TIIENCE SOU/II 00043'07.. EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGIJT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1010.73 FEET; TItENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERI.Y LINE NORTtl 89"50'30" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 442.g2 FEET; TftENCE SOUTII 45°09'30'' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.26 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTIt 00009'30'' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF I00.00 FEET; TttENCE SOUTII 45009'30" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; TItENCE SOUTII 00°09'30'. WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 390.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTIt 45°09'30.' \VEST [:OR A DISTANCE OF 190,00 FEET; TtIENCE SOUTH 00009'30" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 338.00 FEET TO TI IE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 262.649 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, PARCEL NO. ~ A PARCEl. OF LAND LYING IN SECT[ON 21. TOWNSItlP 48 SOUTIi, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUN[Y, FLORII)A. SAID PARCEL OF I.AND BEING MORE PAWFICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOI.I.OWS: COMMENCING AT TIlE NORTIIEAST CORNER OF TI IE SOUTI lEAST QUARTEK (SE I/4) OF SA ID SECTION 2 I; TI IENCE SOUTI189°50'41 ~ WEST ALONG THE N'-~RTIIERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTItEAST QUARTER (SE I/4) FOR A DISTANCE OF 818.47 FEET; TItENCE LEAVING SAID NORTItERLY LINE NORTII 00040'47.. WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 12,87 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITII TIlE NORTItERLY LINE OF WALKERBILT ROAD, TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING OF TIlE ItERE[N DESCRIBED PARCEl. NO. 2; THENCE SOUTIt 89021'48.' WEST ALONG SAID NORTIIERLY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 356,00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITII A LINE PARALLEL WITIt TtlE WESTERLY P,[GIIT-OF-WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL (U.S, 41 - S. R, 45 ); TItENCE LEAVING SAID NORTIIERLY LINE NORTtt 00°40'47'' WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 599.13 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH TI IE SOUTItERLY LINE OF BULKHEAD LINE NO. 3, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I, PAGE 16, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A NON-TANGENT CURVE FROM WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTII 20°56'08'' EAST; TttENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTItERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY. ttAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53003'24" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 370,41 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITIt A NON-TANGENT LINE WIIICH IS PARALLEL WITtt TIlE AFORESAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF.WAY LINE OF TAMIAM1 TRAIL (U.S. 41 - S, R 45); Page 2 of 3 THENCE SOUTII 00°40'47' EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 630.00 FEET TO Tile POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 4.790 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. Bcginnlng Balance ............ $ 130,000.00 DATE PERMIT NO. ROAD IMPACT IMPACT FEE CO. OFFICIAL DEVELOPER FEES DUE CREDIT BALANCE REPRESENTATIVE P~e 3 of 3 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the 'Agreement') is made and entered into this,/,~;~=~day of "~-. , 1998 by and beb~,,een COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as 'County') whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Administration Building, 3,d Floor, Naples, Florida 34112, and OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP SOUTH, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as 'Devefope¢) whose mailing addre:;s is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Ste 200, Naples, Florida 34105. RECITALS: WHEREAS, Developer holds fee simple legal title to the real property (the 'Property') located in the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, said Property being described in Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, Developer represents that no obligation or undertaking ;',ereunder is barred or prohibited by any contractual agreement with any other person o' entity; and WHEREAS, THE State of Florida Department of Transportation ('FDO'f'") and County are desirous of making improvements to U.S. Highway 41 (Tamiami Trail North), from the vicinity of Gulf Park Drive nodh to Old U.S. 41 (C.R. 887), said improvements to include provision of a Right of Way Easement and Drainage Easement, for the widening of U.S. Highway 41, on a 1.608± acre portion of the Propert:/ owned by Developer, more particularly shown in Exhibit "B' which is attached hereto and made a pad hereof (said 1.608± acre portion of the properly hereinafter referred to as the "Contribution"); and WHEREAS, FDOT has informed Developer, the Collier County MPO, and Collier County that in order for said widening improvements to be accelerated in FDOT's adopted work program, the cooperation of adjoining landowners is required and will result in substantial cost savings; and WHEREAS, the padies to this Agreement acknov~edge that the Road Impact Fee Credits established under this agreement shall run with the Properly, shall be assignable by the Developer to any specific projects of the Developer in the County's road Impact Fee Distdct One, and shall be reduced by the amount of the Road Impact Fee due for each building permit issued thereon, until all such Credit has been exhausted; and WHEREAS, County Road Impact Fee Ordinance No. 92-22, as amended, requires that the value of the Contribution shall be based up¢,n an appraisal of fair market value; and WHEREAS, Developer has caused the fair market value of the Contr,bution to be appraised at$,..~7¢ ¢4~¢ .~_~_O and County accepts the appraisal ','alue of the Contribution, and both parties acknowledge that the value is derived from ~n analysis of comparable sales of similar properties, between unrelated parties in a bargaining transaction; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowtedge Road Impact Fee credits shall be a ezedit only against Road impact Fees, and that such Credits shall not offset, diminish or reduce any other charges, fees or other impact fees for which Developer is responsible in connection with the development of the Properly; and WHEREAS, the Developer is' willing to assist FDOT and the County in accelerating the needed improvements in FDOT's work program in return for certain assurances by FDOT and County having to do with timing of the widening improvements and that development of the Properiy can occur in accord with previous and future approvals of the County and that said 'Contribution" will qualify for Road Impact Fee Credits in accordance with County Road Impact Fee Ordinance No. 92-22, as amended, and other law, as further detailed herein; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan is in conformity with contemplated improvements and additions to the transportation network; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan, viewed in conjunction with other existing or proposed plans, will not adversely impact the cash flow or liquidity of any Road Impact Fee Trust Account in such a say as to frustrate or interfere with other planned or ongoing growth necessitated capital improvements and additions to the transportation network; and WHEREAS, such proposed plan, viewed in conjunction with oth(=r existing or proposed plans, will nol create a detrimental imbalance between the uderia[ and collector roadways; and WHEREAS, the proposed plan is consistent with the public interest; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge that the failure of this Agreement to address any permit, condition, term or restriction shall not rulieve either party, or their successors, of the necessity of complying with any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said permitting requirements, conditions terms or restrictions; and; WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge that the burdens and benefits of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the successors in interest to the parties to this Agreements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge that this Agreement is not to be construed as a development agreement under the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act. WITNE$$ETH: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the p:'omises and respective undertakings of the parties hereinafter set fodh and the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowiedged, it is agreed by, between and among the parties as follows: 1. The recitals are true and correct and are herewith incorporated as a part of this Agreement. 2. FDOT has requested and the Developer has delivered and FDOT has accepted the Contribution which consists of 1.608± acres o[ land for a Drainage and Right of Way Easement necessitated by the widening of U.S. Highway 41. Upon dedication of the Con~ibution, and recording of the Easement in the Public Records evidencJng transfar of the conveyance, and acceptance of the dedication by FDOT, the County hereby agrees to grant to Developer Road Impact Fee Credits pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 92-22, as amended, for the fair market value of the acreage described herein in the amount set forth in Paragraph 6 hereof. 3. Developer shall provide FDOT with an attorney's opinion as to the record title holder of the Properly, which opinion shall also identify any lienholders having any lien or encumbrance affecting the portion of the Property k~own as the Contribution. 4. Developer shall convey to the FDOT, via Grant of Easement, the Contribution, more padiculady described in Exhibit "B" hereto. Said Easement has been delivered to the FDOT by the Developer, and a copy of the recorded Easement will be provided to the County by the Developer. 5. This Agreement shall be effective on the date it is executed by said Developer and the County. 6. Upon recording of the Easement and acceptance of the dedicetion by FDOT, the Developer shall be entitled to a Road Impact Fee Credit in the amount of 7. Upon closing, until development of the Property is completed, or until the balance of the Road Impact Fee Credit has been reduced to zero (0}, the County shall apply portions of the road Impact Fee Credit toward the Road Impact Fees which the Developer is required to pay for each building permit which is applied for on the Property, or as provided in Paragraph 8 herein, reducing the balance of the Road Impact Fee Credit by the same amount due for each building permit so issue~. 8. All Impact Fee Credits granted to either Developer hereunder shall be assignable in whole or in part to any successor or assign designated by said Developer, : subject to credit application within road Impact Fee District One, as defined in Ordinance 92-22, Appendix B, as amended, in addition, such Impact Fee Credits may be used by Developer, its successor or assigns, for any land development project in Road Impact Fee District One, 9. County shall provide Developer with a cedified copy of this Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, such that Developer's certified copy of Exhibit "C" (Road Impact Fee Credil Ledger), shall serve as the ledger sheet to document developer's balance of Road Impact Fee Credits, 10. This document incorporates all agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the ~ubject matter of this Agreement that are no contained in this Agreement. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation of the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representation or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration of the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a writt~'n document executed with the same formality, and of equal dignity herewith 11, This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accorda,~ca with the Laws of the State of Florida, 12. Upon written application made unto the County by the Developer, County shall, within sixty (60) days, refund to the Developer the Impact Fee Credit Balance. Said written application shall include a certification made by the Develuper that all development subject to the payment of Road Impact Fees has been completed on the Property. The refund by County shall be disbursed as agreed between Developer and County based upon the Liquidity of Road Impact Fee District One and provided it does not adversely affect the cash flow of said Road Impact Fee District account; provided, however, notwithstanding the foregoing, the refund shall be paid to Developer no later than five years from the date of Developer's apgiication. 13. County shall record this Agreement in the public records of Curlier County, Florida, within 14 days of its execution by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. 14. Either party to this Agreement may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, to enforce the terrn~ and conditions of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all other remedies available to the parties for enforcement of the Agreement. 15. This Agreement may be amended or canceled only by the mutual consent of the parties to the Agreement, or by their successors in interest. 16. This written Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the partiea, and them are no prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, understandings, promizes, warranties or covenants not contained herein. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same waiver, and each of which shall be deemed an original. .. I~.~/.[T, NESS WHEREOF, the County and the Developer have cau~d this Developet'Contrib~tion Agreement to be signed on the day and year first written above, .~'"i~['~?=' .~ '.'"',~ ",~-," BOARD OF COUNTY CO~J'rssIONE~S '~D~IG~T E:"BROc~,~ 'Clerk OF COL~5IER COUNTYn~F~OA"fDA ue~uty Clerk... Attest as to £halraan's BARI~RA B: .~-.,O"'~'~idi r. asfr~on, ~_~tstant 7 Count. y Attorney -- '1 This Developer Contribution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterparts have been signed, thi.~ Developer Contribution Agreement shah be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP in the Presence of: SOUTH, a Florida limited pad~ership Witness \) Lamar G~ble, as/a'"~eneral padner DORIS J. LEWIS Print Ns ~m~,~Zx.j~ {.~. 4~ C~tc V',qtness GNL W. ANDERSON Print Name z-~'h~ f~egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this/'~ day of t~r,J/O~b~'~ , 1998 by Lamar Gable, as a Partner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership South, a Flodda limited partnership. He is personally know~l tQ me~ or has produced as identification. (Nota~/Seal) Notary Public (,,./ Printed name: This Developer Contribution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterparts have been signed, thiz Developer Contribution Agreement shall be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP in the P/resence of~, SOUTH, a Florida limited partnership · a. W~the_~;/~U ,L., /'~T0,~.z~ Frances G. Ville~e, as a general partner Print Name , ~ V~tness DORIs J. LEWIs Print Name STATE OF ~..O~ I ~)A- COUNTY OF ~.z~kz./¢ ~;~e fcc.egoing instrument was ac.k~owledged before me this "~.'(-' day of ,'"~('.~/n~¢'~. , 1998 by Frances G. V~liere, as a Partner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership South, a Flodda limited partnership. ,~h.~ m~.ge or has produced as identification. (Notary Seal) Notary Public ~O.~/l.-/j L, o, ,, omc~..o~,,.'~'~'-'~"~- Printed name: I '~.. '~ ' ...'~ ,,. J '¢ o~ ~.,.o~' OCT. 9 16B7:' This Developer Con~bution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterparts have been signed, this Developer Contribution Agreement shall be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP in the Presence of: SOUTH, a Florida limited partnership Witness DOR~._ J. LEWIb Barren Collier III, as a general partner Witness Print Name STATE OF ~'/0 ~'1~ ~.--- COUNTY OF COl T)~e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me ti~is "'~7'"A--- day of ('[,.)p~Lb,b~'.~. . 1998 by Barren Collier III, as a Partner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership South, a FIodda limited partnership. He is oersor~,Jlv known to m_._~e or has produced as identification. (Notary Seal) Notary Public Printed name: --,. ' ' This Developer Conthbution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterpads have been signed, this Developer Contribution Agreement shall be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP in the Presence of: SOUTH, a Florida limited partnership Witness ~'J~l~'et CTSp,;oul, as ~¢ge~eral partner DORIS J. LEWIS Witness GNL W. ANDERSON Print Name COUNTY OF ~'~e j'oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '777~ day of _,?0 .~.~ , 1998 by Juliet C. Sproul, as a Padner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership South, a Flodda limited partnership. She is person?llv known lo m- nr has produced as identifl~ , (NotarySeal) NotaryPublic ~ Printed name: This Developer Contribution Agreement may be signed in counterparts, separately by each party. When all such counterpads have been signed, this Developer Contribution Agreement shall be deemed fully signed by all the parties. Signed, Sealed and Delivered OCEAN BOULEVARD PARTNERSHIP in the Presence of: SOUTH, a Florida limited partnership V~tness ',J Barren Collier II1, as a general partner DORIS J. LEWIS of and for Ocearl Boulevard Partnership Print Nam~(LL Witness (".,A~ W. ANDERSON Print Name ST^T.O, COUNTY OF ,,~h~re~ing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7~'' day of . , 1998 by Barren Collier III, a general partner of and for Ocean Boulevard Partnership, as a limited partner of Ocean Boulevard Partnership South, a Florida limited partnership. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification[ (Notary Seal) Notary Public ' ~' Description of 53.12 acre parcel, being a part of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida Beginning at the southwest corner o~ Pelican ~arsh Unit Two es recorded in Book 22, pages 4t~8, inclusive of ~he PubJic Records o[ Collier Courtly, Florida also being ~ point on the e~sterly rigbt~f-w~y o~ U.S. 4J, T~mi~mJ Trail Thence along Ihe bounde~ of said plat in the roi[owing six (~) described courses: 1 ) North 89'20'48" East 204.55 feet; 2) Easterly 615.18 feet along the arc of a circular cu~e concave southerly having a radius of 826.09 feel through a cenlral angle of 42'40'~" and being sublended by a chord which bears South 69'19'10'East 601.07 feet; 3) South 47~59'08" East 1~.03 feet; 4) Southeasterly 418.87 feet along the arc of a circler cu~e ~n~ve no~heasterly having a radius of 800.~ feet through a ~ntral angle 29'59'57" and being subtended by a chord whi~ bears South 62'59'07' East 414.10 feet; 5) South 77'59'05" East 144.30 feet; 6) Southeasterly 654.92 feet along the arc of a cir~lgr cu~e con.ye southweslerly having a radius of 395.00 feet Ihough a ~ntral angle of 94~59'52" and being subtended by a ~ord whi~ bears South 30~29'09' East 582.44 feet to the bounda~ of Pelican Marsh Golf Course, Phase 1, Tract 'GCS', as recorded in Plat Book 23, pages 40~7, Public Records of Collier Counly, Florida; thence along said ~unda~ South 17~00'47" West 181.41 feet; thence continue along said bounda~ soulherly 37.60 feet along the arc of a circular cu~e concave easterly having a radius of 130.00 feet through a central angle of 16~34'19" and being subtended by a ~ord which bears South 08~43'37' West 37.47 feet; Ihenoe continue along said bounda~ and a southerly extension thereof South 00'26'28' West 180.64 feet lo a point on the boundaW of Grand Isle at Pelican Marsh as recorded in Plat Book 24, Pages 67-70, Public Records of Collier Counly, Florida; then~ No~h 89~33'32" West 336.81 feet to the nodhwest corner o¢ Pelion Marsh Unit Five, as re~rded in Plat Book 22, Pages 88-89, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along the boundaW of said Pelican Marsh Unit Five, South 00'03'39" East 492.87 feet to the nodherly bounda~ of proposed right-oF-way o¢ Vande~ilt Beach Road; thence along said proposed right-of-way westerly 68.46 feet a~ong the arc of a non-tangential circler cu~e concave southerly having a radius of 2430.00 feet through a cenbal angle of 01'36'51' and being subtended by a chord which bears South 83~50'08" West 68.46 feet Io a point of reverse cu~ature; thence conlinue along said proposed right-of-way westerly 368.67 feet along lhe arc of a circular ~we con~ve nodherly having a radius of 101,9~.54 feet through a central angle of ~'12'26" and being sublended by a ~ord which bears South 83'07'55" West 368.67 feet to a point of ~mpound cu~ature, thence conlinue along said proposed righl-of-way westerly 74.44 feet alcng lhe arc of a dr~lar ~e ~n~ve no~herly having a radius of 686068 feet lhrough a ~ntral angle of 00'37'18' and being subtended by a chord which bears South 83'32'47' West 74.~ feet; lhen~ leaving said proposed right-of-way and along the boundary of lands described in O.R. Book 820, Page 12 of the Public Records of Collier Counly, Florida, and along a non-tangential line No~h 00'39'03" West 2~.61; then~ along the boundaW of lands des~ibed in O.R. Book 680, Page 782, ~odh 48'22'47" West 297.34 feet; then~ continue along said boundaW South 89'20'57' West 420.00 feet point on the boundaw of a parcel des~ibed in O.R. Book 637 Page 1161, also known as trail Boulevard; thence along said ~unda~ Nodh 00~39'03" Wes1200.80 feet; thence continue along said boundery Soulh 89'20'57' Wesl 80.00 ,eel lo a po~t~'~ on the easterly right-of-way oi' said U. S.41; thence along said right-of-way line North 00'39'30' West 1291.06 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described, Containing 53.12 acres more or less. Bearings are based on the State Plane coordinates 1983.Datum, 1990 adjustment, west line of said Section 34 as being South 00°39'20. East. Cedificate of authorization #LB-43. and A Description of part of Pelican Marsh Unit Five, Plat Book 22, Pages 88 Ihrough 89, Collier County, Florida. All that part of Pelican Marsh Unit Five as recorded in Plat Book 22, Pages 88 through 89, Public Records oi' Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of said Pelican Marsh Unit Five; Thence along the boundary of said Pelican Marsh Unit Five SoL,'h 89"33'32" East 306.56 feet to a point on Ihe west line of Tract WF-1 (Drainage Easement) according to the Plat of Grand Isle at Perican March, Plat Book 24, Pages 67 through 70, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along said line South 00°00'00' East 481.17 feet to a point on the nodh line of Tract "B" (Vanderbill Beach Road) according to the Plat of Pelican Marsh Unit Five, Plat Book 22, Pages 88 through 89, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence southwesterly, 306.37 feet along the arc of a non-tangential circular curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 2430.00, through a central angle of 07'13'26' and being subtended by a chord which bears South 88'15'16'West 306.17 feet to a point on the boundary of said Pelican Marsh Unit Five; thence along said line North 00'03'39' West 492.87 feel to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 3.40 acres more or less; Bearings are based on the north line of said Pelican Marsh Unit Five being south 89'33'32' East. Exhibit "B" (Page ~ of 6) This instrument prepared by and when recorded return to: Lee Treadwell PARCEL Barron Collier Company SECTION 2640 Golden Gate Park'way, Ste. 115 STATE ROAD Naples, FL 34105 COUNTY THIS EASEMENT made this [54''k dayof ~6w,,$7-' , 199.~,~ byOCEAN BOULEVARD SOUTH, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Grantor, to the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, its succes~rs and assigns, Grantee, whose post office address is: Post Office Box 1249, Barrow, Florida 3383 I- 1249. WITNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consMeration of the sum of One Dollar and Giber valuable considerations paid, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants unto the Granlce, its successors and assigns, a Perpetual Emsement for the purpose of constructing and maintaining outfa[ls and drainage facilities in, over, under, upcn and th:ough Ihe following described land in Collier County, Florida. The Grantor reserve the right to use the easement for the purposes of landscape buffering, landscape berm, water management berm or wall. It will be the full understand:ng that if the Department of Transportation needs to enter the property to inspect, repair or replace pipe, il is/he Granlor's responsibilhy to repair or replace any dam'~ge within the SEE EXIqIBIT "A' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, and the Grantor will defend the lltle to said lands against all persons claiming by, Ihrough or under said grantor. IN WITNESS WHEKEOF, the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in ils name, ~he day and year first above written. E×hiblt "B" (Page 2 of 6) OCEAN BOULEVARD SOUTH, LTD., a Florida limked panncrsbip Signed, seal~ and delivered in the presence of: ., · /~'~, 6~ ~['~ Lamar Gable, a gene/al panner Wh~clA o~J ~ DORIS J. LEWIS Printed name 9~ )' ~ DORIS J. LEWIS B~ P~ted name t t DORIS J Printed STATE OF FLOPdDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fcgregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this L~day of "~'LL.-.,0_- 199~, by Lamar Gable, as general partner o£OCEAN BOULEVARD SOUTH. LTD.. Fl°rida limitcd partncrship' wh° is pers°nally kn°w;]F~je' ~tltl~] (Lib (Seal) ~ o , ~/)(/"~ , nqc:~.,~..._.'~P~_.~.¥r~.~.z. ] Name,../ II .- ~_- t.qoT, aZy i,~'L~'~P~i, F.L.0 / ' ~ LYNN D. STIR~ [ ~,~ ~ ~ cc:~, / Notary Public in and for the Count- and My commission expires: Serial No. Exhibit "B" (Page 3 of 6) STATE OF FLORJDA , COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this/fl~d;.y o£ ,,.'-~..Ik.-~c~. 199~ by Frances G. Villere, as general paflner ofOCE~ BO~EV~ SOUTH, (Seal)LTD"aFl°ridalimltedpannership'wh°isPers°na~ykn°wnt~e'~;~ (~ j [~os~ l/ LYNN O. ........ o~l/ Nota~ Pubbc m and for the County and L~ ~ ~. Arc. v?~} stae last aforesaid My commission expires: Serial No. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The f~/egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this/_~ day of 199_~ by Barton Collier HI, as general paaner ofOCE~ BO~EV~ SOUTH, L~., a Florida limited paanership, who is persona[~ known ~me. (Seal) OmCL, L t.~,V ,.,L ~ ~ ~r~loN ~, A~ ~7,]~a Nota~ Public in and fbr thc Coum ~ and State last atorcsald My commission cxph~z: S~fial No. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLI]ER The fo;egoing instmmem was acknowledged before me Ibis/f~{day of ~, 199~by 1uliet C. Sproul. ~s general pa~n~r of OCE~ Bd~EV~ SOUTH, LTD.. a Florida limited pannership, who is personally k~o me. ~ I LYNN ~ ~l~ I Nam'~ IJ ~ ' ~ LYNN D, 8~RP J ~ ~m~ [~e. ~ 2~.1~ J No~a~ Public in lnd for lh~ Courtly S~atc l~t ~tor~sald My ~mmission expires: Serial Exhibit "B" (Page 4 of 6) SECTION 03010-2568 PARCEL 804 That portion of the northwest ¼ of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Being described as follows: Commence at the northwest corner of said Section 34 also being the southeast corner of Section 33, of said Township 48 South, Range 25 East; thence along the north line of said Section 33, North 89'52'20" West, 52.70 feet to the survey base line for State Road 45 (U.S. 41~; thence along said survey base line South 01'00'30" Bast, 667.04 feet; thence leaving said survey base line North 88'59'31" East, 52.70 feet to the intersection of the south line of Parcel C, Pelican Marsh Unit Two, as recorded in Plat Book 22, Page 41, Public Records of Collier County, Florida and the east existing right of way linm of said State Road 45, also being the land line common to said Sections 34 and 33; thence along said south line North 88"59'31" East, 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said south line of Parcel C the following six (6) courses: (1) North 88"59'31" Bast, 194.46 feet to the beginning of a curve concave r;outherly, (2) along tbs arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 826.09 feet, a central angle of 42"40~04',, an arc length of 615.18 feet, the chord for which bears South 69"40'27" Bast to thm end of said curve; (3) South 48"20'25" East, 100.03 :~eet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly, (4) along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 800.00 feet, a central angle of 29"59'57", an arc length of 418.87 feet, the chord for which bears South 63"20'24" East to the end of said curve; (5) South 78'20'22" Bast, 144.30 feet to the beginning of a curve concavm southwesterly, (6) along the arc of said curvm to the right, having a radius of 395.00 feet, a central angle of 94'59'52", an arc length of 654.92 feet, the chord for which bears South 30°50'26'' East to the end of said curve and the end of said courses, also bming the northwest corner of tract GC5 of Pelican Marsh Golf Coursm Phase One as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 40, Public Records of Collimr County, Florida; thence along the west line of said Tract GCS, South 16.39130'' West, t~1.41 feet; thence leaving said west line, North 73*20'30" West, 25.00 feet; thence North 16°39'30" East, 181.41 feet to the beginning EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 Exhibit "B" (Page 5 of 6) of a curve concave eouthwestmrly; thence along the arc of said curvm to the left, having a radius of 370.00 feet, a central anglm of 94e59,52., an arc length of 613.47 feet, the chord for which bears North 30J50,26,, West to the end of said curve; thence North 78'20'22" West, 144.30 feet to the beginning of a curve concave northerly; thence along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 825.00 feet, a central angle of 29J59'57'', an arc length of 431.96 feet, the chord for which bears North 63"20'24" West to the end of said curve; thence North 48'20'25', West, 100.03 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southerly; thence along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 801.09 feet, a central angle of 42"40'04,', an arc length of 596.57 feet, the chord for which bears North 69"40'27', West to the end of said curve; thence South 88e59,31,, West, 194.46 feet; thence North 01'00'35,, West, 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1.312 acres. M. A. Kyser ~/L.S. I~366 pete: NOT VALID U~s~/EMBO$SED EXHIBIT "A" Page 5 Exhibit "n" (Page 6 of 6) SECTION 03010-2568 pARCEL 806 That portion of the northwest ¼ of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Being described as follows: Commmncm at the southwest corner of Parcel C, Pelican Marsh Unit %~o as per Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 22, Page 41, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence North 88°59'31'' East a distance of 0.07 feet along the south line of said Parcel C to the easterly mxisting right of way line of State Road 45 (US 41) per Florida Departmmnt of Transportation right of way map Section 03010-2250 for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thsncm continue along said south line of Parcel C, North 88°59'31'' East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 01000'35'' East a distance of 1,290.79 feet to the northerly line of an existing County Road right of way per Official Records Book 637, Page 1161, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South 88'59'25" West a distance of 10.00 feet along said County Road right of way line to said easterly existing right of way line; thence North 01'00'35" West a distance of 1,290.79 feet along said easterly existing right of way line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 12,908 square feet. Legal DescriDtion Approved by: M. ~] Ky~p~r--~.L.S. S43~6 Date. ~/~//~' ID. /99~ NOT VALID UN[/ESS E~4BOSSED EXHIBIT "A" Page 4 ~..~.....balanc" oF ~o~d ............................. Impact FeD Credits applying OHI.Y to the ?ollo~nO property: .. · , . ROAD IHPACT] ~HPACT FEE DATE PE~HIT HO.] FEES DUE CREDIT gALAttCE (SIGNATU~ ~ ; $ . ~ ., S .' $ ., ,, .. ~ ., . $ $ , J , $ $ ~ --' '.',x' ~- , ; ' ........ .: ~ ~_"~ AMENDED AND RESTATED CLAM PASS PARK CONCESSION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED COi',/CESS ON AGREEMENT (herein called the "Agreement") made this IO'f'~ day of N,dd~w,~,~d/-, 1998, between COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision, whose address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112 (hereinafter called the "County") and THE ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS OF THE REGISTRY HOTEL AT PELICAN BAY, INC., a not-for-profit corporation, whose address is 501 Seagate Drive, Naples, Florida 34103 (hereinafter called the "Concessionaire"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, County and Concessionaire entered into a Clam Pass Park Concession Agreement dated April 14, 1998 ("Concession Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Concession Agreement provided that the County would construct certain improvements ("County Improvements") and the Concessionaire would construct certain other improvements ("Concessionaire Improvements"); and WHEREAS, the Concessionaire has agreed to construct Expanded Facilities (as defined herein) beyond those improvements set forth in the Concession Agreement; and WHEREAS, the County has requested that the Concessionaire construct the County Improvements along with the Concessionaire Improvements as part of the Expanded Facilities and the Concessionaire is willing to construct said improvements; and WHEREAS, the County and Concessionaire have agreed to amend and restate the terms of the Concession Agreement to reflect the parties revised obligations. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants, conditions, and obligations herein contained, the parties agree as follows: The County hereby grants to the Concessionaire, and the Concessionaire hereby accepts from the County, the exclusive right and obligation to operate tl'e following described concession at Clam Pass Park, in conformance with the purposes, and for the period stated herein, subject to all the terms and conditions hereinafter set ::orth. 1. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be for ten (10) years commencing on April 14, 1998 and ending on April 13, 2008. This Agreement shall be automatically extended for an additional five (5) year term upon the same terms and conditions contained herein (except 2(A) and (B) below, which will then be moot) unless either party provides written notice of its intention not to renew this Agreement on this basis at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the end of the initial term. If either party desires to extend this Agreement beyond the initial five (5) year extension, that party shall notify 1 the other pady at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of this Agreement (or the extension thereof) of the desired different terms and conditions or fudher extension period and the other party shall respond within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notification. Failure to respond shall be deemed a rejection of the offer to extend. 2. CONSIDERATION. As consideration based upon the respective and mutual obligations and performance required of the parties hereto, it is understood and agreed that: (A) The Concessionaire shall, at its expen-~e, but not to exceed $464,000.00, renovate and improve kitchen facilities in the exiuiing restaurant building, expand the boardwalk and deck facilities (including construction of covered areas), construct additional bathroom facilities, dining facilities, stand up bar and seating facilities ("Expanded Facilit'es ). The Expanded Facilities are generally depicted on Exhibit "A" and may be relocated to minimize environmental impact which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Construction of the Expanded Facilities shall be in accordance with Section 3 of this Agreement. The Concessionaire shall obtain any and all permits necessary for the construction of the Expanded Facilities at its sole cost and expense. (B) The County shall contribute $100,000.00 toward the construction of the Expanded Facilities. Payments shall be made to Concessionaire within thirty (30) days of receipt of a summary invoice and the supporting invoices frcm the Concessionaire's general contractor or subcontractors, and upon satisfactory review by the County. (C) Concessionaire shall operate a tram service consisting of a number of electric power vehicles, with appropriate seating for beach goers, between the public parking area, the Registry Resort and the Beach Facilities. A minimum of two (2) trams shall be operated at all times from May 1 through October 31, and a minimum of three (3) trams shall be operated at all times from November 1 through April 30. In no case shall the time between available trams at the public parking area exceed fifteen (15) minutes. The trams will be operated during periods when the Park is open ar, d shall be of sufficient number to provide convenient transportation for the public and hotei guests. The first point of passenger pick up shall alternate between the hotel and the public parkin9 area. The tram drives shall be uniformed neatly and cleanly in uniforms provided by the Concessionaire. The tram drivers shall wear insignia approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation identifying them as representatives of the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department. (D) The Concessionaire shall be responsible to lease, purchase, maintain, clean, charge and service the trams as required and subject to the County's recommendations. 3. CONSTRUCTION OF EXPANDED FACILITIES. (A) Concessionaire agrees that the construction of the Expanded Facilities will be completed by October 31,2000. In the event the Concessionaire is delayed in the construction of the Expanded Facilities for reasons beyond its reasonable control, the Concessionaire will be granted an extension of time to complete the Expanded Facilities commensurate with the delay caused to the Concessionaire. (B) Prior to constructing the Expanded Facilities the Concessionaire will provide the County Public Services Division ("County") with all proposals and plans for the Expanded Facilities for the County's approval, specifying the nature and extent of the desired alteration, improvement, change or addition, along with tl',e estimated starting and completion time for the project, and including the factual bud~jet statements showing sufficient funding to complete any phase or phases of the Expanded Facilities improvements. If upon obtaining the County's consent and commencing said changes, alterations, additions or improvements, the Concessionaire fails to complete its work within the completion time as approved by the County, the County may, at its election, complete with said changes, improvements, alterations or additions, and obtain reimbursement from the Concessionaire. (C) The Concessionaire covenants and agrees in connection with any maintenance, repair work, erection, construction, improvement, addition or alteration of any authorized modifications, additions or improvements to the Premises, to observe and comply with all present and future laws, ordinances, rules, regul3tions and requirements of the United State of America, State of Florida, County of Collier and any and all governmental agencies having jurisdiction. (D) All alterations, improvements and additions to the Premises pertaining to the Expanded Facilities shall be made in accordance with all applicable laws and shall at once when made or installed, be deemed as attached to the freehold and to have become property of the County and shall remain for the benefit of the count*,, at the end of the term or other expiration or termination of this Agreement in as good an order and condition as they were installed, reasonable wear and tear excepted. Within thirty (30) days of the termination of this Agreement, if the County so directs, the Concessionaire shall promptly remove all construction materials, debris and equipment. The County may effect said removal at the Concessionaire's expense upon the Cor~cessionair,;'s failure to timely and/or fully remove all such materials, debris and equipment upon n ~tice by the County. (E) The Concessionaire shall construct the Expanded Facilities on the Premises in a business-like and reasonable manner, and the Concessionaire's actions shall not conflict with the County's regular control and will be scheduled in such a way as to minimize to the greatest extent possible the impact to the daily cperation of Clam Pass Park. 3 (F) The County, its duly authorized agents, representatives and employees shall have the right to enter into and upon the Premises at all reasonable hours for the purposes of inspection. (G) The Concessionaire will be responsible for all utility service charges incurred during the construction of the Expanded Facilities. (H) The Concessionaire agrees that the Expanded Facilities once completed, shall be open to the public and that service provided to the public will be exactly the same as that provided to hotel guests. 4. BUSINESS OF CONCESSIONAIRE. The Concessionaire by and/or through FPH Management, Inc., its authorized agent, or other operator approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation, may conduct the following kinds of businesses and provide the following services, and only such businesses and services, at the locations set forth below: (A) FOOD AND BEVERAGE SALES. The sale of food and beverages from permanent designated locations or mobile pushcarts in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. (B) BEACH EQUIPMENT RENTALS AND SALE3. The rental by hour/day of beach equipment such as chairs, cabanas, towels, umbrellas, rafts, or other equipment and floatation devices and the sale of beach sundries in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. (C) WATER RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT SALES. The rental or lease of special recreational equipment on the beach including, but not limited to, surfboards, windsailers, catamarans, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreemer~t. Any special recreational equipment or activity to be promoted, rented or sold by the Concessionaire is subject to Concessionaire's ability to acquire the required insurance and the approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation. The Concessionaire must have a motorized chase boat, in good running condition during all hours of operation which meets all U.S. Coast Guard safety requirements. (D) The Concession Agreement may be amended to authorize the Concessionaire to expand the services provided. 5. FACILITIES. (A) This Agreement shall control in the event of an;/direct conflict with the Beach Access Facilities Agreement dated November 15, 1983, as amended. The County owns the parking lot, the gatehouse, the Boardwalk, and the Beach Facilities. The County shall operate and maintain, at its cost, the parking lot, the gatehouse, and the Boardwalk, and shall be responsible for repairs, maintenance and capital improvements at the Beach 4 Facilities. The Concessionaire shall provide daily cleaning and upkeep at the Beach Facilities. The County shall establish and collect all fees and charges for use of all facilities owned and operated by the County. (B) The Concessionaire, at its own expense, may provide a stand or other facility beside or underneath the dune walkover near the Beachside Facilities from which to rend recreational equipment to the users of Clam Pass Park. (C) The Concessionaire is authorized to provide movable umbrella pushcarts for the sale of food and non-alcoholic beverages subject to the restrictions of Sections 3, 19 and 20, hereof. 6. MODIFICATIONS TO STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS. The Concessionaire accepts the facilities and space provided in this Agreement in their present condition, as modified pursuant to Section 2(A) above, and is responsible for all interior modifications and maintenance, including entrance doors, windows and screens. Except as provided in Sections 2(A) above, the Concessionaire shall obtain the County's prior written consent for any alteration, additions, or improvements to structural facilities and then pay and be liable for such modifications, which become County assets upon completion. Detailed plans for any substantial improvements shall be submitted to the County for approval. The Concessionaire shall provide, install and maints, in, at its own cost and expense, all equipment required to operate the concession, but shall have the right, upon approval by the Director of Parks and Recreation, to use the County equipment, furnishings, and fixtures that may presently exist on the Premises. 7. MAINTENANCE. The County agrees to provide the assigned facilities in their "as is" condition, as modified pursuant to Sections 2(A), and to perform necessary exterior maintenance on the facilities assigned to the Concessionaire as well as to maintain the below ground level connection lines for permanent water and sewer utilities. Exterior maintenance of the facilities does not include daily removal of litter of the public areas of the Park, such removal being the responsibility of the Concessionaire. 8. SPECIAL EVENTS. The Premises may be used during and ~fter normal operating hours as further described below: (A) The County reserves the right to allow other conces:¢!onaire(s) to operate upon the Premises during special events during normal operating hours as set forth in Section 15 hereof, as may be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. However, during the term of this Agreement, the Concessionaire shall be the only entity authorized to have access to and use the kitchen and equipment located therein. The County shall be responsible to assure the proper and safe use of the Premises as well as the security of Concessionaire's operating equipment and all inventories when the Premises are used by other concessionaire(s) and the County shall promptly provide 5 maintenance and repair of equipment or replacement of Concessionaire's operating equipment or inventory if such use damages or impairs any operating equipment or inventory or the septic or sewage system or if any inventory is in appropriately consumed or destroyed. During authorized special events, the Concessionaire will be allowed to operate its normal daily complement of equipment and staff. "Normal" shall be defined as equipment and staff that the Concessionaire has available at the Premises on a normal day, 365 days per year. Such equipment shall not be increased or altered during special events without the prior express written permission of the Director of Parks and Recreation. (B) The County shall make the Premises availabl¢, for groups to hold after- hours private events such as beach barbeques and similar functions. All groups, including Concessionaire, desiring authorization to use the Premises after hours shall schedule such use with the Director of Parks and Recreation in advance, complete a Rental Permit Agreement form and pay a usage fee in the amount of $200.00 per hour to County for the use of the Premises. This usage fee shall be subject to modification upon mutual agreement between the County and Concessionaire. Payment of this fee to County shall qualify each group as an "authorized group." (C) All authorized groups holding special private events at the Premises and desiring to provide tram transportation shall be required to use Concessionaire's trams, which shall be operated only by authorized Concessionaire employees, and such groups shall not be permitted to provide their own tram or other motorized transportation to and from the Premises. Members of authorized groups not using tram transportation shall be able to walk freely to and from the Premises on the boardwalk. (D) Concessionaire shall charge authorized groups for providing tram transportation, including tram driver(s), at the rate of $25.00 per tram per hour and shall bill to and collect from each authorized group directly for such tram services. Concessionaire may adjust this per tram, per hour rate with the advance written approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation. Concessionaire may, at Js sole option, waive any charge for tram services. (E) All authorized groups shall furnish all food. beverages and other materials necessary for their functions, and sharl leave the Premises in the same condition as that in which they found them, i.e., groups shall be responsible for all trash ~,,~moval and disposal, cleanup of tables and seating areas, etc. (F) No group holding an after-hours event shall be permitted to provide amplified music or steel-drum bands. All groups shall be subject to all County noise ordinances and shall be responsible to ensure full compliance therewith. (G) The Concessionaire shall be entitled to contract privately with any authorized group to provide catering or other services desired by the group; however, the Concessionaire shall not be obligated to provide any transportation or other services to groups that do not wish to contract for Concessionaire's services. The Concessionaire 6 shall be the only entity authorized to operate trams upon the boardwalk between the County parking lot and the Premises and to have after-hours access to and use of the kitchen equipment in the restaurant facility at the Concession, The public restrooms shall remain available to authorized groups holding after-hours functions at the Premises. The recreational rental equipment of Concessionaire at the Premises shall not be available or accessible to any authorized groups, unless arrangements for such uses and access are made between the group(s) and Concessionaire. 9. USE OF THE BEACH IS PRIMARY. The Park is for the use of the public for recreation and other public purposes, and the Concessionaire's activity shall not infringe upon the public's right to such use, subject only to Section 8 ahqve. The location of any equipment, cart or any other materials of the Concessionaire are subject to approval of the Parks and Recreation Department. However, this does not preclude the Concessionaire, upon obtaining prior written approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation, from scheduling promotional events, including events which might temporarily limit access to the Premises, or any portion thereof. 10. COUNTY CONTROLS BEACH. Nothing in this Agreement will preclude the County from using the public areas of the beach for public and/or civic purposes as deemed necessary; however, these areas of the beach may not be closed to other public use during normal hours of operation. 11. SERVICES AND DUTIES. The Concessionaire agrees that the operation and maintenance of the Park and concession stand(s) is to be handled by trained personnel, with emphasis on safety and maintaining the Beachside Facilities and immediately adjacent beach in a neat and orderly fashion. The Concessionaire hereby agrees to perform the following duties: (A) Maintain the bathroom facilities in a clean and sanitary condition at all times. (B) Qualify customers and give instructions on th( operation of the various rental equipment. (C) Oversee the general use of the Boardwalk, Beachside Fqcilities, and the immediately adjacent beach, and shall report all misuse, damage and viol,dions to the authorities and notify the Director of Parks and Recreation as a~propriate. (D) Furnish all soap and other consumable supplies for the restroom facilities. (E) Collect, bag and place the garbage in containers, and have the containers removed from the Premises. 7 (F) Remove trash daily and provide litter pickup for all trash and debris not in containers for the immediately adjacent beach, Beachside Facilities, Boardwalk and surrounding areas, excluding the County Public Parking Area. (G) (Reserved) (H) (Reserved) (I) Open and close the Park according to established Park hours, subject to Section 8 above. 12. COUNTY PUBLIC PARKING AREA. Any maintenance or supervision of the County Public Parking Area shall be the sole responsibility of County. Concessionaire shall have no duties whatsoever with respect to the County Public Parking Area, and shall incur no expenses or liability with respect thereto. The Concessionaire will ensure that no employees will park cars in the public lot during their working hours, unless previously approved in writing by the Director of Parks and Recreation. 13. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Concessionaire agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin in its operations under this Agreement; and fudher, there shall be no discrimination regarding any use, service, maintenance, or operation of the Premises. All facilities located on lhe Premises shall be made available to the public, subject to the right of the Concessionaire to establish and enforce rules and regulations to provide for the safety, ordedy operation and security of the facilities. 14. ORDERLY OPERATION, ETC. The Concessionaire shall at all times have a neat and orderly operation and shall maintain afl necessary housekeeping services for the Premises. There shall be no living quarters no shall anyone be permitted to live on the Premises. 15. HOURS OF OPERATION. Concessionaire shal~ open the concession stand(s) no later than 9:00 a.m. and close not eadier than 6:00 p.m., seven (7) days a week, unless otherwise agreed with the Direction of Parks and Recreation. The Concessionaire also agrees top open and close the public Park from dawn to dusk unless specifically authorized in writing by the Director of Parks and Recreation to do otherwise or the premises are in use in accordance with Section 8 above. Du,ing inclement weather, the Concessionaire shall use its own best judgment regarding closing the concession. County shall have the right to request Concessionaire to extend its normal operating hours to accommodate County-sponsored events for up to 15 hours of such extended operations per year, at no cost to County. Concessionaire reserved the right, for any extended operation beyond 15 hours per year, to require a written guarantee from County of revenues to be generated during such extended hours, in amount(s) to be mufually agreed upon by the parties. 16. PRICES. All prices must be visibly displayed to concessionaire's customers, and must be approved in writing by the Director of Parks and Recreation. The Concessionaire shall rent or sell only those items approved in writing by the County. 17. SIGNAGE. Concessionaire shall, at its sole cost, provide and remove signs at all public approaches to its concessions. All advertising, signage and posting shall be approved in writing by the Director of Parks and Recreation. 18. VEHICLES IN PARK. Vehicles, other than authorized pedestrian trams, emergency vehicles and authorized construction vehicles, are only allowed in areas where roadways are provided and vehicles will park only in areas desipnated for vehicle parking. The Concessionaire shall have the right to use vehicles on the beach only to load and unload equipment and supplies, and for septic tank maintenance and cleaning. 19. CONTAINERS/BIODEGRADABLE. The sale or dispensing of beverage in bottles is not permitted nor shall bottles or glass containers be permitted in the Park. Beverages may be sold or dispensed in cans, plastic or paper cups, although biodegradable containers are most desired from a County standpoint. The dispensing and use of straws is also prohibited. 20. STORAGE. Concessionaire agrees that there will be no overnight storage of any kind west of the Beachside Facilities, unless a special exception is issued by the County. 21. NO DANGEROUS MATERIALS. The Concessionaire shall not use or permit in the Boardwalk, Beachside Facilities, or Park the storage of illuminating oils, oil lamps, turpentine, benzine, naptha, or other similar substances, or explosives of any kind, or any substance or adicles prohibited in the standard policies of fire insurance companies doing business in the state of Florida. 22. CONCESSIONAIRE NOT TO REMOVE PROPERTY. The Concessionaire agrees not to remove any personal property brought into the Par!; for the purpose of this Agreement, except such items as may be reasonably necess..qry for Concessionaire to meet requirements of: (a) seasonal demands; (b) special events conducted by Concessionaire; and (c) the repair or replacement of property. In a,qy even! the County shall be notified of any potential removal of property that may affect the styh.,., amount or quality of service or accommodations at the Park. The parties r,,cognize that Concessionaire's service requirements under this Agreement shall not be limited or reduced by the removal of its property. Provided Concessionaire satisfies its obligations under this Agreement, it shall, within fifteen (1 5) days after expiration of this Agreement, remove its personal property and equipment from the Premises, provided such removal can be accomplished without damaging the Premises. Should Concessionaire fail to remove such personal property and equipment, the County may cause same to be removed and stored at the cost and expense of the Concessionaire, and the County shall have a continuing lien thereon in the amount of the cost and expense of such removal and 9 1 6C1. ' storage until paid, and may sell such personal property and reimburse itself for such cost and expense, including the expense of the sale. 23. SECURITY. The Concessionaire shall provide any security measures which may be required to protect the Beach Facilities, and its equipment and materials. Such security measures may not violate local or state law or other restrictions of this Agreement. 24. NO LIENS. Concessionaire agrees that it will not suffer, or through its actions or those actions of anyone under its control, or supervis;on, cause to be filed upon the Park any lien or encumbrance. In the event any lien is filed, Concessionaire agrees to cause such lien to be discharged within ten (10) days of recei,'!ng written notice from the County. 25. INSPECTION. The Concessionaire agrees that the concession facilities and Premises may be inspected at any time by authorized representatives of the County Administrator or by any other state, county, or agency official having responsibilities for inspections of such operations. The Concessionaire agrees to immediately undertake the correction of any deficiency cited by such inspectors. 26. RECORDS AUDIT. The Concessionaire agrees to establish and maintain such records as may be prescribed by the County to provide evidence that all terms of this Agreement have been and are being obsen,,ed. The Concessionaire grants to the County the right and authority to audit all records and documents pertaining to the concession operation. Such audit will be conducted at locations and at a frequency determined by the County and communicated to the Concessionaire. The Concessionaire agrees to provide materials for the audit at the designated place within three (3) business days after the County's notice is received. 27. ENFORCEMENT. (A) The parties agree that the County shall have, ~ continuing lien on such personal property or trade fixtures of the Concessionaire Iocatea at the Clam Pass Park, said lien against such personal property or trade fixtures for the sums which may, from time to time, become due and unpaid to the County under this Agreement. Upon default of any required payment(s) by the Concessionaire, the County shall have the ;ght to take possession of and retain Concessionaire's personal property and/or trade fixtures to the extent of the herein described lien value until the full amount si~a!l be paic, or to sell the same at public auction, and after deducting the expenses of sale and reasonably attorney's fees apply the balance of the proceeds to such payment, and if there should be any deficiency to resort to any other legal remedy available to the County. Simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement the Concessionaire will furnish .*.he County with two (2) complete UCC-1 Statements, to cover such personal property or rental equipment at Clam Pass Park in an amount equal to the County's lien under this Agreement, one to be filed locally and one to be filed in Tallahassee. The UCC-1 Statement shall evidence the County's secured status for the performance of the Concessionaire's obligations. Any 10 change or amendment to the UCC-1 Statement(s) indicating different property of Concessionaire to secure County's lien hereunder shall require a written amendment duly executed by the parties. (B) In the event of any willful violation of this Agreement by the Concessionaire, or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Concessionaire to be noted on the Concessionaire Inspection Report, the county shall have the right to suspend the operation of the concession should the Concessionaire fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County. The Concessionaire shall not commence operation during such suspension until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 28. PERFORMANCE BOND. Upon executing this Agreement, Concessionaire shall post with the County a performance bond in the amount of FIFTEEN THOUSAND ($15,000.00) DOLLARS. (Best's Guide of rating of A- or above.) The performance bond shall be issued by a surety company authorized to do business in the state of Florida, and shall be released at the termination of this Agreement, provided Concessionaire has satisfied its obligations under this Agreement. 29. INSURANCE. (A) Concessionaire's responsibilities: Concessionaire shall procure the following insurance with insurance companies licensed in the state of Florida, and shall file evidence of such insurance with the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department. INSURANCE LIMITS (1) Worker's Compensation Statutory limits of the state of Florida and Employer's Liability in an amount not less than $100,000.00 (2) General Liability Bodily Injury & P;operty Damage Premise Operations (M&C or OL&T are required) Included: Products $1,000,000.00 Single Limit Completed Operations Bodily Injury & Property Included; Damage Combined Each Independent Contractors occurrence (O.C.P.) Included; Supervision Exclusion Deleted; Personal Injury Liability (3) Contractual Indemnity/ $1,000,000 Single Limit 11 Ho~d Harmless 8odily Iniun/& Prope~y Endorsement Damage Combined Ea¢~ (4) Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice Required. (5) Collier County Board of Commissioners named as "additional insured." (6) The Insurance Certificate must state the Bid Number and Title. (B) All insurance policies required shall be issued and written with a company or companies authorized to engage in the business of :~eneral liability insurance in the State of Florida and authorized to do business under the laws of the state of Flodda, with the following qualifications as to management and financial strength: The Company must be rated no less than mA" as to financial rating in accordance with the latest edition of Best's Key Waiting Guide published by AM Best Company, Inc. (C) The Registry and/or Registry's general contractor shal~ delivery to the County customary insurance certificates of insurance prior to the construction of the Expanded Facilities which certificates shall cleady indicate and evidence such paid up insurance and that said general contractor has obtained insurance in a type, amount and classification as required for strict compliance with this Agreement. The said general contractor shall agree to make no changes or cancellations of the insurance without thirty (30) days pdor written notice to the County. The said general contractor shall assure that the insurance coverage provided shall require the company or companies writing such insurance policy shall provide to the County written notice of cancellation thirty (30) days prior to any such proposed cancellation. The County reserves the right to reasonably amend the insurance requirements by issuance of notice in ',vdting to the general contractor. Said insurance shall not exceed that required by ~he County for similar projects. Upon receipt of such notice, the General Contractor shall have thirty (30) days in which to obtain such additional insurance. (D) County Responsibilities: (1) The County shall maintain the same kinds of iI~surance with the same kinds of coverage on County-owned Facilities provided for in this Agreement s ~ the County maintains on all other County-owned real and personal property. (2) In the event that the County does not maintain such insurance on all County-owned personal and real property and funds are not available '~'or repair or replacement of Facilities provided for herein, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as imposing on the County the obligation to repair or replace the County-owned Facilities provided for herein. Should the Premises, during the Term of this Agreement, then become inoperable or if any required operating permit be revoked as a result of any failure of County to repair or replace any County-owned Facilities, Concessionaire shall 12 have the option, with the prior written approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation, of providing such repair or replacement at its own expenso and to seek to obtain reimbursement from County for ail costs thereby incurred. 30. INDEMNIFICATION. The Concessionaire agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all losses, penalties, damages, settlements, costs, charges, professional fees or other expenses or liabilities of every kind and character arising out of or relating to any and all claims, liens demands, obligations, actions, proceedings or causes of action of every kind and character in connection with or arising directly or indirectly out of this Agreement and/or the performance thereof. 31. PERMITS; LICENSES; TAXES. The Concessionaire and the County agree to cooperate and to obtain all required governmental permits and licenses necessary for conducting business, and Concessionaire shall pay for all permits obtained. The Concessionaire agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to person employed by the Concessionaire. The Concessionaire shall be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the concession operation. In addition, the Concessionaire shall comply with all rures, regulations and laws of Collier County, the state of Florida, or the U.S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. 32. UTILITIES. (A) The Concessionaire agrees to pay for all public utilities provided to the Beachside Facilities and used within the concession operation, including but not limited to: electric, potable water, sewer and telephone. (B) The Concessionaire shall, at its own cost, provide any propane gas or other fuels needed for its equipment and operation at the Park, under this Agreement. (C) The Concessionaire shall provide any commt,'nication system required for its business operation, and such equipment shall not interfere ~uith any public telephone installation within the Park. 33. MONTHLY REPORT. A monthly repod of activities, in a form dgveloped by the Concessionaire and approved by the Director of Parks and Recre~:tion, shall be submitted to the Director of Parks and Recreation by the 15th of each month. 34. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION. If either party fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof, and such non-compliance is not cured within thirty (30) days after written notice is given to the non-complying party, the non-offending party may terminate this Agreement. Should County, under the terms of this Agreement, be entitled to declare Concessionaire in default and terminate this Agreement, then the County may revoke the privilege of the Concessionaire to enter the Premises for the purposes for which this concession was granted, and the County may oust all parties present upon the 13 Premises attempting to exercise any of the rights so revoked. Continued occupancy of the facility by Concessionaire after termination of this Agreement shall constitute trespass, and may be prosecuted as such. In addition, the Concessionaire shall pay to the County ONE HUNDRED ($100.00) DOLLARS per day as liquidated damages for such trespass and holding over. 35. ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the County Administrator or his designee. 36. NOTICES. (A) All notices from the County to Concessionaire shall be deemed duly served if hand delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail to: THE ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS OF THE REGISTRY HOTEL AT PELICAN BAY, INC. 501 Seagate Drive Naples, Florida 34103 (B) All notices from the Concessionaire to the County shall be deemed duly served if hand delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail to: COLLIER COUNTY c/o Public Services Administrator Building H Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 With copy to: Director of Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Department 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd. Naples, Florida 34116 (C) The Concessionaire and the County may change the above mailing addresses at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this concession Agreement must be in writing. 37. NOT A LEASE. It is expressly agreed that no part, parcel, build,rig, structure, equipment, or space is leased to the Concessionaire, subject only to the provisions of Section 8(B) hereof, and that there is no lessor/lessee relationship between the padies. Concessionaire's right to operate the concession shall continue only so long as the 14 concession operation complies with the undedakings, provisions, agreements, stipulations, and conditions of this Concession Agreement, 38. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Concessionaire or to constitute lhe Concessionaire as an agent of the County. 39. ASSIGNMENT. The Concessionaire may not assign this Agreement or any pad thereof, without prior written approval of the Board of County Commissioners, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective successors and ass[ons of the parties hereto, if any. 40. COOPERATION. The Concessionaire agrees to cooperate with the County in conducting surveys and to provide reports of visitor usage of concession services. Where this Agreement provides for the County to provide a response or perform an act upon the Concessionaire's request, the County shall promptly respond or act upon such request, and shall not unreasonably withhold its consent where County's consent is required. Any right, power, privilege or obligation allocated to the County Administrator under this Agreement, may also be performed by the County Administrator's designee. Fudher, the County agrees to provide the Concessionaire with advance notice of any special event and to coordinate with the Concessionaire regarding same. County also agrees to provide Concessionaire with notice of the availability o; plans for any remodeling of the Beachside Facilities or the Boardwalk. 41. FORCE MAJEURE. in the event of major storm, red tides, hurricanes or other such occurrences, the County shall remove or cause to be removed any and all debris from Clam Pass Park and associated County facilities when deemed feasible by the County. 42. ATTORNEY'S FEES. In the event it becomes necessary for either pady to litigate in order Io enforce its rights under the terms of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement from the other pady of ifs costs and reasonable attorney's fees, including those incurred during appellate proceedings. 43. WAIVER. No waiver or breach of any covenant or condiion of this Agreement shall be taken to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach of such covenant or condition nor to justify or authorize the non-observance on any other occasion of the same or any other covenant or condition hereof, nor shall the inaction Of County at any time when Concessionaire is in default hereof be construed as a waiver 0[ such defaull or County's right to terminate this Agreement due to such default, nor shall cny waiver of indulgence granted by County to Concessionaire be taken as an estoppel against County. 15 44. WAIVER OF LOSS FROM HAZARDS. The Concessionaire hereby expressly waives all claims against the County for loss or damage sustained by the Concessionaire from or by the public, or from the Registry Resod, its guests and patrons. 45. CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. The padies agree that in case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or uneforceability shall not effect any other provisions thereof, and said Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained therein. 46. ENTIRE UNDERSTANDING. This Concession Ag;').ement contains the final and entire understanding and agreement between the padies hereto, and supersedes any prior concession agreement or extensions thereof betweerl such padie~ Or any term, statement, representation, warranty or corldition, oral or written, not COrltained in this Agreement. However. the Beach Access Facilities Agreement of November 15, 1983 shall not be affected by this Agreement except as expressly provided herein. Any modification of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both padies. 47. FLORIDA LAWS. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state of FlOrida. Concessionaire must be registered tO conduct business in the state of Florida and be able to furnish satisfacfory proof of such regislration. 48. COMPONENT PARTS. This Agreement consists of the following Component pads attached hereto, each Component being a pad of this Agreement as if herein set out verbatim: (A) Insurance Cedificate(s); and (B) Bond. (C) Exhibil "A" 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Concessionaire and County, have each, by an authorized person or agent, executed this Amended end Restated Clam Pa~¢ Park Concession Agreement on the date and year first above written, in h, vo (2) counterpad~, each of which ~hell, without proof or accounting for the other counterpart, be deemed an original Agreement. .~TTE~,T:' t.~/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ''" ' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DW!OHT, E BROCK CLERK Attest a$~ ~t?noture Signed, eealed and delivered in lhe (Corporate ~eal) pre~enceof: THE ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS OF THE REG~ HO~ AT PELICAN BAY, Witno~8 Approved aa Io form and legal ~ufficlency: Assistant County Attorney 17 TOTAL P.~ BOAR OF COUNTy COMMiSSiONeRS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE if ~ 1' '"~ NOVEMBER 10, 1998 I. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITII ACTION AS DIRECTED: 2. Clerk of Courts: Submitted for public record, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1). the disbursements for the Board of Cot, nty Commissioners for the period: A. October 12 - 16, 1998 B. October 19- 23. 1998 3. District: A. Collier Soil and Water Conservation District Notice of Meeting B. Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District Agenda of October 14, 1998 C. South Florida Water Management District Letter of October 15, 1998 from Frank Williamson, Jr.. Chairman, Governing Board Io Mr. Robert B. Bradley, l)irector/Officc of Planning and Budgeting/Office of the Governor 4. Minutes: A. Airport Authority Agenda of October 12, 1998 and Minutes of September 21, 1998 B. Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board Agenda of October 19, 1998 C. ltistoric and Archaeological Preservation Board Agenda of October 16, 1998 and Minutes o£ September 18, 1998 D. lmmokalee Beautification Advisory Committee Age,Ma o£October 21, 1998 and Minutes of September 16, 1998 E. Isle of Capri ir:ire Control District Advisory Committee Minutes ol October 1, 1998 F. Lee County Metropolitan Planning Organization Agenda of October I6, 1998 and Recommended 2020 Transportation Plan Amendments in the Bonita Springs-Estero Area and Adoption of 2020 Plan Amendments by the Lee county MPO G. Pathway Advisory Committee Agenda of October 16, 1998 and Minutes of August 21, 1998 AGENDA/IT-EM No. Ir-:,C-7 / NOV 10 1998 Data: 10/22/1998 To: Sue Filson Aduninistrativc Assistan~q~CC From: Robert W. Byrne, CMA ~1 General Operations ,",lanager.'Clerk's Finance Dt-parm~enl RE: Board of Count.',' Comlnissioners Disbursements Please find enclosed lhe disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period October 12 through October 16, 1998. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), :vt would rcq:zest lhal these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the record. If you have any queslions regarding Ibis maner, please telephone me at 774-8481. Thank you for your cooperation. R\VB . , M SC. (.0rres. Attachments Date: ltern~ Copies To: AGEN~OA~ITEM NO · .L~[;~ NOV 10 1998 Pg.__/ BCC VENDOR MANUAL WARRANT LOG DATE NAME AMOUNT C/:L~GJ~ ~ 10/12J98 Sprint 122.65 469318 Past Due Bills 10/13/98 Holiday Inn - Orlando 1.140.00 469320 Tax Seminar - cry Arty 10/13/98 Holiday Inn - Odando 75,00 469321 Conference - Giblin 10/16/98 Economic Day Council 3,874.57 469938 Payment 10/16/98 IRS 450.00 469939 Correction 10/16/98 City of Odando 125.00 469940 Travel - Ed Finn PAYROLL MANUAL ~ARR~NT DATE NAME AMOUNT ~ ~ I0/15/98 David Cook 256.26 194843 Overtime Hours 10/15/98 Nancy Olson 776.73 194844 IRS refund 10/15/98 Warren Keys 823.66 194845 Regular Time 10/15/98 Gina Duke 1,009,26 194846 Regular Time 10/15/98 Carol WelIs 611.89 194847 Regular Time 10/15/98 Glen Miles 295,85 194848 Ovedime Hours 10/16/98 David Fox 131.90 194849 Regular Time 10/16/98 James Wiggins 202.47 194850 Regular Time 10116198 John Clements 101.41 194851 Overtime Hours Dato: 10/27/1998 ... 1o: Sue Filson Administrative AssistanffBCC General Operations Manager/Clerk% Finance Depamnent RE: Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find enclosed the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period October 19 through October 23, I998. In accordance with FIorida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), we would request that these reporB be included as miscellaneous correspondence tothe Board of County Commissioners and made part of the record. Ifyou have any questions regarding this matter, please telephone me at 774-8481. Thank you for your cooperation. RWB Attachments Pg-..~ a., ~ BCC PAYROLL MANUAL WARRANT LOG DATE NAME AMOUNT .~ R.~kS_OH 10/19/98 Cad Shea 612.78 194853 Regular Hours 10/2'~/98 Arcadio Pivera 50.00 'i94854 Emp of the Mon[h BCC VENDOR MANUAL WARRANT LOG DATE J~ AMOUNT ~ I3E.~ 10119/98 Brazilian Court Palm Beach 180.00 469941 Travel - Judge Tumer 10/19/98 Parkland Hilton 601.68 469942 Travel - Judge Martin 10120198 FAPA Annual Conference 290.00 469943 Travel - Hancock 10120198 FAPA Annual Conference 295.00 469944 Travel - Amy Taylor 10/20198 Fla. Dept. of Revenue 4,955.73 469945 Sales Tax 10/22/98 Guymann Construction 310.788.11 470403 Riviera Colony 10123198 iCMA Conference 910.00 470404 Registration 10/23/98 Mardott Orlando 660.00 470405 ICMA Hotel 10/23/98 Ed lischner 93.00 470406 A,f"ance Per Diem 10/13/1998 09:~0 9414552693 ~ ~ ~ W~ ~ DI~ NOTICE OF ~EETIN~ The Collier Soil & Water Conservation District will meet at 4:00 p.m. on wednesday, October 21, 1998, at the Golden Gate Community Center. The meeting is open to the public. OCT 0 9 1998 AGENDA GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT 4741 Golden Gate Parkway DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1998 TIME: 6:30 P.M.-10:OO P.M. Recess If Not Completed 1. Pledge of Allegiance/Invocation 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of Minutes, Date(s): 9/8/98,9/9/98,9/22/98,9/22/98 4. Old Business: A. Discussi<~n on Proposed Golden Gate Blvd. Changes for Sra.71 B. Discussion on Future Fire Station Site C. Revision of District 1 Contract ~(orr i $ D. Discussion on Disposal of 75 FMC Engine Hancock E. Expansion of Station 71 for EMS Quarters Constantine__/ Mac'KleV/ Berr~ 5. New Business: Au Approval for Purchase of New Phone System B°Request for Chief to Attend FL EDACS Users Group Meeting Nov. 10-13 6. Reports: A. Operations B. Expenditures . C. Un ion Da~e2 ,~ /-- - 7. Adjourn GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT' -- "~ "~-~D E-'~--AT'-~ ~N~PLES,'~ FLORIDA 34116-6901 (941) 455-2121 · FAX (941) 455-7917 Septembe~ 23, 1998 Clerk of the Circuit Court Finance Department 2671 Airport Road, Court Plaza III Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Sir/Madam: The Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District Commissioners, during the September 9, 1998 meeting, have established the second Wednesday of every month for their regular meetings. The following is a list of the regular fire commission meeting dates for fiscal year 1998/99: October 14, 1998 April 14, 1999 November 1], 1998 May 12, 1999 December 09, 1998 June 09, 1999 January 13, 1999 July 14, 1999 February 10, 1999 August 1t, 1999 March 10, i999 September 08, 1999 All meetings will be held at the fire station located at 4741 Golden Gate Parkway and will commence at 6:~0 P.M. Sincerely, Donald R. Peterson Fire Chief DRP/pm G: South Florida Water: Management 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm lleach, Iq,wida 33406 TDD (561) 697-2574 ' FIN08 RF: 98858 Octo~r 15, 1998 ~rrta Hanc~k Mr. Ro~a B. Bradley, Director C~to.ttne Office of Planing ~d Budgeting ~c'~te ~// Offi~ of~e Governor Berr~ R~m 1501, ~e Capitol Tall~see, FL 32399-0001 De~ Mr. Bradley: Subject: Approval of South Florida Water Management District's FY99 Budget I would like to ~c ~is opportunity to reflect on the FY98-99 budget process md th~k you md yo~ stuff for ~e h~d work, effort, ~d diligence put fo~ in revie~ng the Dis~ct's budget. In pmicul~, I wouId like to th~ Est~s ~itfield ~d his stuff- Te~ Pride, Smdra How~d, md Rob L~ord - for ~eir continued coo~ration in discussion of issues s~, ~llin~ess to delve into ~e de~ls of o~ complex budge~ ~d ~mplete md · orou~ ~de~mding of ~e m~ad of ve~ difficult choices we have made ~ou~out ~s most ch~lenging budget press. We appr~iat~ ~e co~ctive fe~back received from Est~ ~d his stuff t~ou~out ~is ye~'s process. ~is feedback md ~e ~lla~tive a~itude ~een o~ stuffs h~ b~n es~ci~ly helpful -- providing ~e ne~s~ guidmce to allo~te f~ds efficiently to meet o~ needs md to avoid budget incr~es ~at would result in a millage incre~e. In addition, prompted by a more exte~ive md ~orough review ofo~ budget process ~is y~, I ~Seve we have made ~mter sffides towed ~e ~er development of ~mtive workk:g relafioms~ps · e Governor's Offi~ ~d o~er water mmagement dis~cB - ~nefici~ to ~1 entities - ~ we work together towed ~e ~mmon goal of protection of Florida's water reso~ces. As mentioned in yo~ leaer to me dated Septem~r 15, 1998, "pressing needs co~:tinue to exist for adequate water supply, improved water q~ity, restoration of ~e Everglades ~d o~er na~fl syste~, ~d flood protection". As you ~e aw~e, ~ese "needs" ~e long-te~ in na~e ~d MIl continue to challenge ~ for m~y yem to come. You also mentioned "~e Disffict's ad valorem capacity, even at ~e co~titutional millage cap, will not ~ ad~uate to tin.ce your state-directed res~nsibilities ~d o~er water reso~ce priorities of yo~ region'.'. As difficult choices ~11 ~ made again next ye~, we look fo~d to wor~ng ~ yom s~in aiding us wi~ ~e evalmtion of prog~ p~ofities, identifi~fion of cost sh~ng op~nu~ties, ~d the development of incre~ed efficiencies in order to effectively develop a sound budget ~d process which promotes bo~ mt ~d confidence. Fink W~n, Jr., Ch~man Vcn bL Caacr ~ch~d A, blachck Samuel E. P~lc III, E~ne ~ Penis, ~ce Chh~an ~iam E. Gr~am Michael D. Minton Michael Sla~on, Mr. Robert B. Bradley, Director October 15, 1998 Page 2 Your staffhas identified several areas that require further attention during the next budget cycle. Some specific areas mentioned include the following: a) continued refinement of budget reporting requirements, b) a review of specific District fiscal policies, c) a review of all water management districts' salary structures, d) thc development and implementation of pcrfon-nance measures, e) the evaluation of the District's funding needs, use of revenue, and cost sharing opportunities, 0 the evaluation of water resource education expenditures for all water management districts, and g) a review and refined definition of water resource development projects These areas are important and we have already begun an internal review of several of the aforementioned areas. District staff and the other water management districts are meeting monthly on items a, b, and g. Our Human Resources staff is currently working with your staff to address salary structures. District staff has pre~ented your staff with . our performance measure information and will continue to work with your staff as we refine and further develop these measures. We will meet with Terry Pride to discuss the District's funding nee&s, use of revenue and cost sharing opportunities. Our Government and Public Affairs department will continue to work with your staff in the evaluation of water resource education expenditures. In addition to these areas, your September 15t~ letter also addressed concerns about the 59 new full-time positions. Specifically, you asked tkat the District re--evaluate whether the activities to be carried out by new positions can be handled through conlxacted services and assess whether increasing efficiencies and staff reallocations c:m eliminate the need for filling some of these positions. I have directed staffto pofform the re-evaluation and report those results to you. In response to your request, we propose a three-step process to re-evaluate tl~e need for the 59 new f~ll-time positions. 1. Each program manager will convene a program team to reconfirm the existing need as identified during the original staffing need analysis. This process will also consider contracting options as well as other options such as contracting with universities, environmental resource centers, leasing companies, etc. 2. Through attrition management, we will continue to evaluate vacancies so that redirection may be used to reduce the number of new position requests. Mr. Robert B. Bradley, Director October 15, 1998 Page 3 3. We will review/modify current criteria for leased workem to take advantage of contractual opportunities through consulting firms. This proposed process will re-enforce the District's on-going staffing planning efforts in support of our mission. I would be pleased to discuss this proposaJ 'vith you or your staff at your convenience. We will meet with Mr. Whitfield's staff- together with the other water management districts - next month to address several of the aforementioned issues and continue building on the cooperative spirit developed over the past two years. I will instruct staff to make every effort to provide your shaft with the information needed to aid in their review of these issues and to further understand our budget. I look forward to your comments during the upcoming year. Again, please pass along my appreciation and accolades on a job well done to your staff. Sin ely, Frank Williamson, Jr. Chairman, Governing Board South Florida Water Management District FW/mh Enclosure c: Linda Loomis Shelly Estus Whitfield SFWMD Governing Board Members Samuel E. Poole III Michael Slayton Trevor Campbell Joe Moore Recipients of SFWMD's August 1, 1998 Tentative Budget Submission 09/~G/1990 1~:85 OGO-992-G200 IOOV ~ ~F P~ Septem~r 15, 1998 ~. Sony Wi~o~ Governing Bo~d Char P.0. Box ~g Ok~o~, ~od~ 34973 ~ ~. W~on: S~on 373.536(5), ~ofi~ Smtu~, ~od~ ~ ~fivc Offi~ of ~c ~v~or ~G) to ~w ~ ~p~v~, ~ whol~ ~ ~ p~ ~ budget of ~h w~ m~agcm~t ~s~- ~ ~on ~ p~d~ t~t ~ ~p~ of ~y p~v{s~on ~ ~ t~v~ bu~t must ~ ~v~ by ~c ~ct ~ 1~ 5 b~ ~ prior to ~c f~ ~ budg~ adop~n h~g ~ ~' ~Y ~om rcj~ by ~ ~v~or s~ not ~ ~u~ ~ ~ governs ~ ~y p~ ~ F~ ~p6on of ~e budget ~ ~o~ of ~ ~y ~ of yo~ p~ bu~ o~ ~vlcw, ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ you. Bnd¢~ R~ew ~e ~'~ ~ of~ ~'s ~dg~ f~ ~ I~8-~ ~ ~e (~ ~ to ~ 30) ~ ~ ~.ive ~ ~ ~a. f~ ~ ~¢ ~ w~ -~hle ~ wo~ ~ ~e ~ ~ut fie devdop~, of ~ budg~. Howev~, ~ ~e E~ ~d ~e ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ For ~e ~ y~ I~8-~ ~dg~ ~vd~m~h we w~ ~le ~ wo~ ~ ~c d~ ~ugho~ ~ ~c ~. We ~so w~ ~le ~ ~ ~ p~, ~ ~ou ~ ~c ~, le~vc ~ ~, a ~ fo~ ~d p¢~ ~r ~e ~ ~v~ew. ~ s~ a~d~ gov~g ~d wo~hops, pubUc h~gs, ~d ht~ ¢~ ~io~ on ~v~ of bus~s, ~c~ ~d ~o~en~ ~ter~u, ~d bu~ bfie~gs by ~ch of ~e ,09/1G/1~90 1G;32 050-grJ2-G~O0 G-JV EJ~V ~e E~'$ ~eview of ~ct budge~ i~ guid~ b ~ ~e~ of obj~fivc~ b~ on ~mmto~ r~emen~, region~ n~ds. ~d. the Gov~og~ dofifi~. We have p~vid~ obj~v~ to ~c d~s~c~ ~d o~c~. ~ in a wnuen su~ of ~e budget review pr~css ~d on ~e Governor's O~cc websig. ~e p~ f~us offs y~s budget review was for ~e di~ to ~te ~un~ more e~enQy to m~ ~e~ n~ ~d to avoid budget inc~ ~ would resell ~ a ~agc ~' ~ budg~ re~ 1~ for ~c ~7-98 ~ y~ ~owl~g~ ~ ~mpl~ty o~ Yo~ ~[b~fi~ ~d~ ~e Ev~g~ Forev~ A~ ~c eno~$, ~d ~pl~on 1~ ~v~. ~d mor~ ~ ~y ~ of ~c ~dg~ ~ow~ ~ ov~e of ~ost ~c, ~=*,ly :$7.5 million ~ new rev~u~. On July 9. ~e gov~g ~op~ ~ ~mfive budg~ ~d ~e l/~ mill ~c for pu~s~ of T~ ~ ~l~c noting. Through mceth~gs, phone discusfion~, and wfitt~ lXctimhn:~r~J commcn~S, the £OG ~e dis~ct to rMu~ i~ budget to s~y wi~in ~e~sOng ~llage rotc. ~c prc~n~ budget review ~cn~ provid~ s~ific su~fi0ns ~ to wher~ to l~k foe r~ucfions. D:smct st~f ~dc a n~r of ~c ch~gcs su~st~ volun~y cut &~ budg~ m vinous ~. s~ fund sources. ~d fouad ad~fioa~fun~ ~ou~ mor~ a<umt~ proj~do~. ~ucndy, ~s~ ~ w~ ~lc ~ r~cad a ~n~uadon ~agc budget to ~c gov~g ~d, whi~ ~c ~d ~mfivcly ~opt~ on Scptcm~r 9. HoldNg to ~c ~dnt millage w~ ~ow for ~c ~ysN ~f ~s~ pdodfi~, fun~ng n~, ~d ~ v~*m ~a~ty. ~ou~ ~ ~s~ct re~n~ i~ e~g ~age ~, ~c pro~s~ budg~ ~clud~ 59 new fu~-~ ~siHons ~ k~ up wi~ N~ d~. ~s N~ ~ ~si~ follows a ~ent ~sifio~. ~le w~ ~d~d ~ n~ for ~fio~ s~aff, wc r~u~ ~c ~ m move ~f~y ~ fi~g ~c ~si~ons. We ~ ~ ~e ~s~ct ~v~u~ wh~ ~ ~ti~ to ~ ~ out by ~ ~si~oas ~ ~ ~ ~u~ s~ ~d ~ ~ m ~e ~cl~ions of~ r~vMu~on. ~e ~s~ should ~ w~ ~g effi~ ~d s~fi~ m avoid ~ n~ f~ filling ~ of ~ ~sifio~. ~ ~t ~ould ~Ic~t ~ ~i~'s ~im~ ongo~g ~ ~o~ ~t ~b~o ~puC ~u~g ~d ~,lly ~ of I~ go~~ ~ w~ l~gcly sup~vc of~ ~m~ ~d ~ ~- R ~ you w~ ~Ic ~ ~d~ ~ ~u~ m a ~f~ &~, ~w~, wi~out a ~ N;~. ~nfinulng ~v~ ~ ~ wN~ r~u~ f~'~fiom Wc ~ ~n~u; to wo~ ~ you on · c fo~owMg issue: Budget ~ R~~oindy ~ ~c ~ ~d ~s. ~c ~ d~el~ a $m~ budgm re~ fo~ for ~ ~¢ w~ ~nag~t ~, ~ for ~e ~t ~ ~s y~, ~ more cl~y ~d ~y ~play~ budg~ ~o~on ~ p~m~ ~d ~fi~. During ~y~s ~viCw, ~ ~, wi~ ~p~t ~m . H~ Oen~ Gove~ent ~ ~i~, reg~dNg n~ ~provemen~ to fo~ ~clu~g a cl~ expr~sion of disM~ Fbc~l ~ollci~-Wc wiU condn~c to review thc d[s~ct's ~sc~ ~lici~ ~d, su~t ch~scs ~o czisdn~ ~[icic~ ~d d~ dcvdop~cnt ol ~d~ ~or pr~ctic~ clear ~licy. 8ala~ Stature--We will con~u~ to work wi~ ~i ~: dist~c~ ou m~ng ch~g~ ~al~ ~et~es to ensure ~ ~ff~cfive, con~o~. ~d ~un~blo syslem of ~m~nzafion · at w~ enable ~m ~o r~Jl ~nd re~n ~m~nl ~. Pe~omn~ M~-W~ ~ N ~ pr~s of d~v~lopNg a ~r~ set of me~es for ~ ~e ~s~c~, wi~ ~put ~om ~ ~gNla~, Nt~t ~oups, ~d ~ pubic on ~ rc~on~ ~d s~c lewis. Wc ~c aw~c ~at ~c dis~a b~ ~ wor~g on ~ffo~ m~es N[cm~y for some ~e now. ad Cx~ aa~ wc will ~ ~w u~n CrOuton ~d ~tabh~m~t o[ ~ ~s~ri~s F~ N~-Wc w~ wo~ ~a ac ~ ~d oam m ev~uam ac n~ m ~ by ~o~ 1. Wat~ R~ ~umaon-All o~ ~c ~ fund w~ ~ wJu~on to Wa~ R~ Dev~opm~t ProJ~-B~ on I~ ~ le~ bd~ b ~c sm~d budg~ fo~ ~ ~vi~ ~gow for ~ ~ ~) pmJ~. We ~ ~ 'w~ ~t' ~d 'wa~ ~ ~vclopm~t pmJ~" ~usc ~ ~ ~ ~ b~y d~ ~ ~oa 35'3.019, ~od~ St.m~s. to bcl~ pl~bg, w~ apply. ~ ~ ~r~ of ~on 373.0361, H~ S~, ~ ~des for ~ wa = ~pply w~ supply ~vdop~nC ~umfly, we ~ l~g f~ ~c ~dg~ ~o~ ~or w~ r~o~ dcvdop~t pmj~: ~o~ ~j~ d~i~ m ~a~ ~m ~fl~ or ~s[iv¢ s~, ~ i~n~le, qu~lc supply of w~ for ~g ~W~ ~mrc ~ ~ ~ca to qu~gy ~c w~r supply ~n~fi~ o~ ~ wacr r~o~ d~v~opmeat p~j~ ~y bcludc under aa ~ ~go~ b ae smd~d form,~t. -09/15/~9'30 ~G:32 050-992-G200 :GDV ~',,/ AF'F PAG~ 06, Budgeting for WILD projects is a new ~uca and v~¢ havc nol yet rcacho:t a common understanding among thc districts as to how to handle it. We have asked the districts to re- evaluate ~hc projects they have included as WRD projects in their proposexl budgel~ and to provide us with a more accurate estimate, if nec~$ary, of thc costs associated with creating water supply. This is important in order to be able to compare this fiscal year's budget al. locarions fairly to future budget allocations for WR.D project. Wc will be assisting district stMf with this re-evaluation. I appreciate the cooperafioa and responsiveness ol[ district staff and ti,,: govcraing board throughout thc district' s budget review process. The goverrting board has ma.4~, some difficult choic.~ in order to stay within thc di~'trict'~ existing millage rate. Th. is office wig pro¥idc ~t morc dctailcd account of thc budget review process and its findings in our December 15 Report on Water Management District Expe~nditurc~. plc2se Ict mc or Estos Whitficld know ii' you would like to discuss any aspect of the pending report or the issues ~ ~ this Ic~tcr. Siacerely, Robert B. Bradley, Director Office of pl~nnlng and Budge. ling RBB/m~p Li~da Loomis ShcUcy .E.~t us Whitficld SFWMD governing board members Sam Poolc Mike Slayton Joe Moore Thc SFWMD's response pursuant ~o F.S. 373.507(3)c, to 'u.a-ilten commenls regarding the Fiscal Ycar 1998-99 proposed budget has been mailed to the following individuals: ttouse of Representatives lrlo Bronson. l louse of Representatives, House Agriculture Commitlee I.isa Carlton. Florida l[ousc o£ Rcprescntalives,/louse Water 8: Resource Mgmt Committee l.¢e Coastanline, Florida i touse of Representalivas, Jo[nl Committee on Everglades Oversight CommJIlee Rudy Garcia, l louse of Reprcscntal[ves, I tousc Fiscal Responsibility Council Bill Poscy, l louse of Representalivcs, ltoase Governmcnl Operations Commiltee Ken Pruitt, ttousc of Representatives, House General Governmenl Committee Charles W. Scmbicr II, Florida I loasc o1' Rcprcscntativcs, Environmental Protection CommiItcc Robert J. Starks, Florida Itousc of Representatives, llouse Finance & Taxation Commhtce Daniel Webster, ttousc of Representatives, £pcakcr of thc Itouse Rcprcsentativcs The Florida Senate Charles Bronson, Thc Florida Senate, Senate Agriculture Commiuce W.D. Childers, The Florida Senale, Subcommittee A, Senate Ways & Means AJ Gmman, Thc Florida Senate, Dado Count)' Legislative Delegation Toni Jeunings, The Florida Senate, Presidenl o£the Senate Jack Latvala, The Florida Senate, Natural Resource Committee John Ostaikiewicz, The Florida Senate, Subcommittee E (Finance & Tax) John Rayson, The Florida Senate, Broward Legislative Delegation Tom Rossin, The Florida Senate, Palm Beach Legislative Delegation Donald C. Sullivan, The Florida Senate, Ways & Means CommiUee Charles D. Williams, The Florida Senate, Senate Governmental Reform & Overs/g/it Committee Deparlment of Environmental F'rotection Ms. Mimi Drew, Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Water Policy Ms. Pinky Hall, Department of Environmental Protection, Inspeclor General Secretary Virginia Wetherell, Department of Environmental Protect/on County Commissioners Burl Aaronson, Palm Beach County Commission Barbara B. Berry, Collier County Commission ClifBetu, Jr., Okeechobee County Commission Jeri Canale, Highlands County Commission Jero' L. Caner, Polk County Commission Linda Chapman, Orange County Commission Gary D. Charles, Sr., St. Lucie County Commission Matthew DeBoer, Charlotte County Commission Chuck Dunnick, Osceola County Commission Robert L. Giesler, Glades County Commission Wilhelmina Harwey, Monroe County Commission John E. Manning, Lee County Commissioner Gwen Margolis, Miami-Dade Commission Donna S. Melzer, Martin County Commission Lorl Parrish, Boa.rd of County Commissioners Janet B. Taylor, Hendry County Commission State of Florida Governor Law, on Chiles Sandra Howard, State of Florida, Executive Office of the Governor Rob Lank£ord, State o£Florida, Executive Office of~c Governor Terry Pride, State of Florida, Executive Office of the Governor SFWMD Yvonne Gsteiger, SFWMD COLLIER COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORIT' " AGENDA .., DATE: October 12. 1998 PLACE: Marco Island Executive Airport, 2003 Mainsail Drive. Conference Room, Naples, FL TIME: l:00pm Any person ~ho decides lo apl>cai a decision of I tis A;.rport Authority wiE need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record will include all testimony and ecidence upon which the appeal is to ~e based. ' I. Call meeting to Ordc~ and Quorum Check i~r~s Il. Approval o['Agc~da qancock Constantine Mac'K~e 1II. Approval of September 21. 1998 Meeting Minutes gerry J IV. Administrative A. Pay Range B. Executive Director's Performance V. Everglades Airpark A. USFWS Visit- Eagle's Nest VI. hnmokalee Regional Airport A. Airlield Signage Grant B. Supplemental Grant fbr AWOS C. Development Staodards 1). ManLdhcluring Incubator VII. Marco Island Executive Airport VIII Old Business A. l'oint of Sale Svstco Misc. COIA.IER COUNTY AIRPORT AUTItORITY MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1998 MEMBERS Monte Lazarus Michael \Villiams Richard Anderson PRESENT: l lerbert North Ernest Spinelli Gene Schmidt Steve Price ABSENT: None STAFF: John Drurv Thomas Pahner Julic qurdelte PUBLIC: I,uc Cartiere I)avid Wilkonson P, on Davis George Bamm I. MEETING CAI.LED TO ORDER AND QUORUM CIIECK Meeting called In order at 1 :I 5 p.m. and quorum ',','as present. II. AI'I'ROVAL OF A(;ENI)A Mr. Lazarus imroduccd M'r. Schmidl, the nevdy appointed Board member, to dm Authorily lloard members. Mr. Drury reported Ihal thc Marco Island Airport vklco was completed. Mr. Drurv reqnestcd that Good Time llclicopter be added lo the Agenda under IV Administralive. Election of New Officgrs, Emerprise Rentnl Car, Sheriff vehicle donation to Immokalec Airport, pre-construction meeting for lhe Incubator, and reliremem pJall R)r slaffbe added Io thc agendn. Mr. Williams moved Io approve the Agenda. Nh. Spinelli sec(ruder Ibc motk q. Motion passed unanimously. I11. APPROVAL OF AU(;UST 17, 1998 IIOARI) ?,IINUTES Motion was moved to approve lhe August 17. 109R Board blinules. Motion ,,vas seconded. Motion passed unanimously. · Airport Au~horily l~oard Minulcs 1 ~) G ~, i~ .qcplembcr 2 I, [ 998 Page 2 IV. AI)i'qlNISTRAT]VI,'_, 1. Marqo Island Airpgfl_._,~sjdc~ Thc completed video was played for tile Board members. Gc, odtime clico ter-Ron )avis ,".Ir. l)n~ry reported that he spoke with EulcrprJsc Rental Car regarding giving up their space and have the Airport continue to handle their rentals for a fee. This v,'ould open up space to allow Goodtirne Ilelicoptcr Tours to operate at ,X4arco I';xccutive Airport. Mr. D. rury introduced Ron [)avis of Goodtirne lJclJcoptcr Tours to give an overview of his plans for his company at the Marco Airport. Mr. [)avis reported that he would be doing the same type of tours that lIcli- Tours was doing. ArJal photos would be taken and sold to public. Concern '.','as raised regarding the competition of another operator. It was reported that at the present time H'eli-Tours does not have a helicopter and their plans for future tours Were unkuown. Mr. Drury reported that if it Were au I"BO hc ',vnuld bc concerned. Ilowever, Mr. Drury sees it as two operators providing the same service competing on price and service and he (lid not see it r. xs a big problem. Mr. Drury recommended that we take over Enterprise Rental Car, be paid a fee, and open ap the space to allow Gooddme Ilelicor~t,;r Tours to operate at thc Marco Executive Airport. Mr. Drury rcqucstcd [h~lt thc l'3oard authorize staff m enter into m annual agreement with Goodtirnc llclicoptcr Tours under ihe same t,:rms and coudJlions as the p~sl helicopter tour that was entered into about 3 months ago. ,'Vlr. gpinclli moved fl)r approval to enter into an annual agreer;~ent with (;oodtimc l lelicoptcr 'I'mlrs. Mr. Noren seconded thc motion. Discossion was hcld and molion passed unanimously. · Airport Aulhority Board Minules September 21, 199~ Page 3 3. l_ndus rial Park I,ots - Immokalee VI-~ Mr. l)rury requested that item VI-4 be taken out of order. Luc Carrier and David Wi k son's who '.','ere present at the meeting had a busy schedule and their input was requested for this item. Mr. Drury reported lhat the airporls have been very !',:xible with lease plots and therg are no lease plot boundaries. What we nrc asking of our tenants tell us what amount of land they need and work with our Engineers or their own lingineers, survey their own plot nnd make it pa~ of the exhibit. Mr. Drury has found that this does not work ve0, well because lhe majority of ~tenfinl tenants would like lease plots a/ready defined. ~e other issue is that we are about lo go beyond our pemfitted areas which was secured by George Archibakl. Mr. Dru0, Feels that we have come to a time ~vhere we need permit ~he wbotc phase one development area; survey eacb and every industrial lease plot and have a map wilh the boundaries and stakes pu: p/ace; and lake a serious look at obtaining a master umbrella permit For the entire airpo~. Mr. l)ru~ introduced Mr. Cartiere lo istroduce what we would need Io make tbis easier R~r our tenants. Mr. Carriere presented a copy of Ibc Airpo~ Master Plan. Mr. Cartiere reported on the environmental issues and how the Immokalee Ai~o~ was dealing with lhose issues, lle pointed out various areas that could be developed and areas flu~t had been approved. Lease Jots were identified but thc size of thc lots needed to be identified in each area. The airpo~ needs to :*drq~tcd a St~rm;;atcr Management Plan allowing tbr large drainage ditches arotmd thc Industrial 'ark The dev,d part of the ( ch Ibc m~u , ' ' · ' "~ goal is to minimize tit: amount of time that n developer bas be spend lo where he can actually come in and start building. Mr. Wilkison reported what fl~e district rcqt~ired and what he Felt ~ is needed for the Immokalee Ai~on. lie spoke about obtaining a Conceptual Environmental Resource l'crmit. This permit looks at impacts to wetlands, lands, endangered species, and surface waler flood. After speaking with Mr. Drnry their plan was to look nt the entire ai~o~ based upon the Minster Plan aud with tbe Cooceptual Permit pcmfitling lhe cooceptual development of the entire Airport. The Conceptual enmt locks you m o the cri~er n oFtoday and it gives you the ability once you get outside the first phase to permit things quicker allowing tile Airport to gel tenanls into fl~eir spaces with minimal difficulty. Thc permit could take up to a year to obtain. Scplcmbcr 21. 1999 Page 4 ,",Ir. I)rury requested that thc Board give authoriz411ion to ncgoliate with Dufl-esne-I lenry a work order tbnt would accomplish everything that is needed Io be done. Mr. Drury ~vill ll~en come back and present Io lhe Board what bas been negotinled. The off,er issue thai Mr. Dm~ wanted lo address was lhe utility services. Mr. Dru~ would like more detail on ibc Masler Plnn where all lhe underground water, sewer, telephone, nnd electric lines are mapped out. When the time comes be will lhen be able to know where the substation For some of fl~e larger manufaclt~ring companies will be and hoxv large they ~vill be and who wilt pay for them. Mr. Williams moved for approval to Mr. I)rury's request. Mr. Noren seconded fl~e motion. Discnssion was be[d and mo/ion passed unanimously. 4. 'l~xiwa~liuntion Work Ord The Ibwironmenlal Resource Pe~h No. 113054565 issued by Ibc Florida Dcparlmenl of En~'imnmen~al Pro~ec~ion requires lhal the Ai~orl Au~horily , kill 4.6 acres of Brazilian Peppers in lhe Collier Seminole Stale Park ns m~[~ga[~Oll l~3r [}lO environmental impact of Ibc mangrove clearing at :Marco Island l!xecmive Ah~on. Stag bas negolia~e~ a supplemental work order whh Du/?esne-llenry in fl~e amounl of $29,370.00 to address work necessary to comply wilb lbo ~ernls and condilions oF die gnvironmenlal Resource Permit. The supplemental work order specifically covers the cosl ~he initial lrcalmenl of ~he xot~cs, ~hree years of mainlennnce and annual monhoring. Mr. Drury recommended dm~ lhe Amborily approve the supplemenlal work order with I)ul?csne-llenrv in Ibc amour]/ S-9,_~70.00 and au ~orize thc ('hairman m execute thc documents whh his Signature. Discussion was held. Mr. Spinelli moved Ibr approval of Mr. Drury's ~ccommemlalion. Mr. ~ 'JJiams secom ed Ibc motion. Molion passed tmanimo~slv. ('o.!~lan~n~ed~oiI Remi~[iafion~wnrd of Bid On Neplember 9. 1998 ~he ColJier County Purchasing Depnnment 5 bids fbr thc soil rcmediation project ~t thc Marco Island received Executive A~rpon. S~aff rccomment s lbat Ibc Aulhonty accept the k)w l~d {?om W.E.S. Inc. and aulborizc Ibc Cbaimlan lo execute a conlracl wilb X .E.S., Inc. in lilt: amotmt el' 54 g,746.4(1 · Airport Authority Board Minutes I 6 September 2 I, 1998 Page 5 Mr. Price moved for approval of staff's recommendation. Mr. Spinelli seconded Ibc motion. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Manernve Cleari ~Bid VII-3 Mr. Dmry reported that we received bids in tile amount of SI67,587.00 from Florida Environmental which exceeds our budget by about $35,000,00. We reqnested from FDOT a supplemental grant for $32,000.00 which is 90% of our short fall· They bave awarded ns with additional £r~nts to take care of Ibis over budget item· Mr. Dmry recommendation is that tile Authority transfer $3,500 from nur reserve Io match tile $32,000.00 additional grant to award the Mangrove cutting for Marco l'Txecutive Airport to Florida Environmental in the amount of $167,587.00 Mr. Spinelli moved for approval of Mr. Drury's recommendation. Mr. V,/illinms seconded tim motion. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Georee Barren Mr. Barrnn spoke to tile Board and reported that be had enjoyed working witb the Board for I e past nine 3.'ear and wisbed tbat only the best for the Airport ,'\utbority. 8. ~crlvFinanciaJ Sta_temen~ts Mrs. Learner updalcd Ibc Board on tile Quarterly FinanciaI Statements. {'Everglades fi~el sales arc down due to El N/no which had taken out a number of aircrafts, lmmokalee is selling enough fi~el to pay for staff. Revenues Were reported to be on track. As of October I, 1998 there ,.vii! be a rent increase to all tenants. Management report ex en tile 9 months. ' p scs for tbe overaa airport is in line for 9. TDC Grant Mr. Drury informed the Board that the BCC unanimously approved the TDC Board's recommendation to award a $90,000.00 grant to market the airports. All flmds must be expended consistent with tbe grant application and documentation must be provided identifying the number of"head in Beds" the program developed during the Summer season. V. EVI';RGI,AI)ES AIRPARK I. ~12~jid l'~venl - Pancake Fly-bm Airport Andlor'ity Bol)rd Mirnltcs September 21. 1998 Mr. Dmry in£ormed the Board that Everglades Airpark ,,vas kicking off a l'nncakc Fly-bm. This is a way to track people through rural ai~oNs. These individnals becmnc Iinniliar with thc airport and fl~cy come back to visit. Mr. Bhflock is setting tiffs activity up and in order to do so be will need to purchase a griddle, serving table, supplies, pancake batter, syrup, etc. This will be a monthly event. Staff' recommendation was lbr approval oF Resolution 98-37 authorizing the pnrchase tff materials necessary to Commence anti put on this special event. This sum shall not exceed $3,625.00 Mr. ~pinclli moved fi>r approval of staffs recommendation. Mr. La~rus seconded thc motinn. Motion passed unanimously. VI. IMMOKALEE I~E(;IONAL AIRPORT 1. ~[~mu/hcmring.Inct~hntor Project Mr. Drury rep(mod that there will be a pre-consm~ction meeting at the hnmokalcc Airport on October I, 1998 at 10:00a.m. Thc contractor, engineer, and Mr. I)rury will get together and discass various schedules. On October 9, 1998 there will be a mcedng wJ[]l US[lA a[ the Immokalee Ai~om. at ~0:00a.ln. and a Notice lo Proceed will be issued. ' Dcch~ration o['I)cvclnpmunt Standards Mr. Dmry requested that the Board look over the draf~ of the Declaration of Development Standards fnr the next couple o' week~ Mr. Drury requested flint if there was any suggestions to fax them to him with their ~o~:s At the next l~oard meeting Mr. Drury will bc asking thc Board to adopt thc Dcchtmtion of Dcvcl(~pment Standards which sets the tone of the Industrial Park. 3. AWOS This item will be presented at lhe next Board meeting. Airport Authority Board Minutes Seplember 2 I, 1998 Page 7 4. ENVOI, ~3nufactqring M'r. Drury reported that ENVOL is in d~e process of desi~nin~ a 3,000 square foot facility to consl~ct parachute wings ~br ultralight type aircraft. The Board will be updated as negotiations move lo.yard. 5. l~mcn~onc [~esolu on Mr. Drury rcporlcd that thc Counly l~]anning Department has ashed if we will panncrslfip wilh Ihcm on the Empowe~em Zone application process. Sud'f was recommending dml the Board accept Resolution No.98-36 for Mr. Williams moved IBr approval of staWs recommendation. Mr. Spinelli seconded d~e motitm. Molion passed nnanimously. 6. Minor k'ch~clc [~nt l,case Mr. Druu' requested that tim Board approve renewal Department lease. Their rent will be doubled in order to be charged fair market value. This will bring their payment up o $640 00 a year. Mr. Price lll()Vctl lk)r approval of sl;]/Vs rccommcodation. Mr. ~ pmelh sccundcd ll~c motion. Motion passed unanimously. 7. A~qcpt Su~ntal Grmt-Scrub J;W np green Mr. Dmrv re?ned flint the FDOT has agreed to a purchase ora Commercial tractor mower to manage the Scrub Jay hah at area. The FDOT will pay for 80% or $28,374.19 of tbe cost of this capital acquisition which was approved by the Authority on June 8, 1998. The Ambority is asking that tbe lescription of the original Supplemental Grant be changed to include the mower. Thc staff rccomnmnds that the Authority accept the supplemental grants from the FI)OT and authorize the Chaimmn to execme thc grant documents. Mr. Spinelli moved lbr approval of stafffs recommendation. Mr. Price seconded the motion. Motion passed nnanhnously. September 2 l, 1998 Page § VII. MARCO ISLAND EXECUTIVE AIRPORT 1. Ca__!ering Services Award Contrac! Mr. Dmry reported that Fat Pelican has been providing the airport with catering services for the airport customers. The Authority's rcqocstcd proposals from firms interested Jn providing catering services to the customers of the IVlarco Island Executive Airport. The only response received was from Fat Pelican. Staffrecommcnds that the Authority accept Fat Pelican's proposal to provide catering services to the airport's customers for a 10% concession fee and authorize Ibc Chairman to execute an agreement with Fat Pelican for a 2 year period renewable for an addition 2 3,'ear period at lhe Authority's discretion. Mr. Spinclli moved for approval of stales recommendation. Mr. Noren seconded d~c mot/on. Mot/on '~assed unanimously. VIII. OI.I) BUSINESS None IX. .NEg, BUSINESS I. ~9 Rcnta~l Car Mr. Drury reported that negotiation arrangements had been made for En erpr/se Rental Car to service Immokalee Airp,'nt and the Everglades Airpark. A sign ilar Enterprise Rental Car ,.',,ill be set up. They presently service Marco Executive Airport. Out of their Bonita office they ',vill deliver t, cars lo hnmokalee. They ,.viii deliver cars on a fiat bed to the ";verglades ' Airpark. This xvill allow all three airports to have car rental service. Thc Sheriff has agreed Io dc, narc a courtesy vehicle for the Immokalee Airport. W'e are working with Fleet Management to determine ,vhat it ",viii cost to keep it properly maintained. The Cc, unty has comprehensive liability fi)r all the vehicles and we will need to add this vehicle to (,ur list o£ inventory. Mr. SpJnc]li moved For approval fi~r Mr. I)mry to look into the cost of maintenance. Mr. Price seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Airport Authority Board Minutes September 2 l, 1998 Page 9 2. ~xccutive Director's Contract Mr. Dmry reported that tile County bas a pa)' range for different positions. When you exceed the top of your pay range the County no longer pays for retirement. Mr. Dmry requested that the Authority xvould at, horize the Chairman of the Authorily to execute the necessary documents authorizing the payment of retirement benefits consistent with every other County employee being equal Io the approved percentage for their salary, and that the range not be capped off at tile County's range but be capped of at tile Authority's range. /)Jsct ssion was held. Mr. ['rice moved for approval that a range be set for review at the next Authority meeting for all management personnel. Mr. Spinelli seconded the motion. Molion passed unanimously. 3. AnIhoritv Board Scrvic_e Mr. Lnz.qrus asked if an individual that had served on the Board receives n certificate recognizing their service. Mr. Drury indicated that individuals receive a certificate from tile Board of Count3, Commissioners and a plaque from 0lc Aulhority. t '.vas decided that it would be made a malter of policy lhat a plaque be presented to Board members at the end of their term. 4. Electim~ or'New t)~Sccr=s It was motioned that M'ichacl Will/ams be elected as the new Chairman. Mr. ' Price seconded tile motion. Motion passed unan mous!y. Mr. Spinelli moved that nominations be closed. Mr. Noren seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Williams was unanimously elected as Chnirnlan. It was motioned lo elect Mr. Notch as Vice Chairman. Mr. SpineIli seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Noren was unanimously elected as Vice Cbalrman. · Airport Authority Board Minutes September 2 I, 1998 I"agc I 0 Mr. l'ricc motioned In elect Nit. Schmidt as Sccretao,. Mr. Noren seconded Ibc motion. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Schmidt was unanimously elected as Vice Chairman. 5.._Simz, le lin~ine Aircraft The Authority inslrnctcd staff to invcstigatc Ibc acquislqon of a single engine aircraft and report back its findings. 'f'he aircraft would be used by staff to get Ir> the three airports. I:AA in Orlando, VI)O'I' i~ Barrow and Tallahassce. X. A D.IOUIINMENT /vleeti~'~g adjourned at :,: )2p.m. OCT ENVIROMENTAL POLICY TECHNICAL ADVISOR¥~BOARDunt y AGE~A DATE: October 19, 1998 Haoc~k C~st~nt~ne: ~ I ~-- Hac'Kte v - PL~: ~o)Hc? ~oum7 ~ovc~cnt ~o~pIcx 8err) ~ 3rd Floor, Room C TIME: 4:00 p.m. I. CALL MEETfNG TO ORDER Il. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Seplember 14, 1998 IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS V. OLD BUSINESS a. Environmental board consolidation (LDC Amendments) VI. STANDING COM.,"diTI'EES A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (1) Steering Committee - Vacant (2) Resource Committee - Mike Simonik (3) Growth Managcmenl - Mike Delate B. SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITI'EE REPORTS (1) NRDBudget- Vacant VII. NEW BUSINESS VIIi. PUBLIC COMMENT Misc. Corres: IX. ADJOURNMENT Da,e: --~O/~e ,tern, C7 g/-5 Copies To: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COM M UNITY DEVELOPMENT AN D 2800 NORTIt HORSESHOE DRIVE ENVIRONMENTALSERVICF~S DIVISION NAPLES, FL 34104 October 7, 1998 norris ~,-,coc~ Const~ntt~ Ms. Christina Eggers .,ac 'K l e /" / CLG Coordinator Bureau of Historic Preservation ~;~rrI l,// R.A. Gray Bu~icling 500 South BrSho'hgh Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 RE: Collier County Preservation Board Meeting Dear Ms. Eggers: This letter is to inform you that the Collier County Historic and Axchaeological Preservation Board will hold a public hearing on Friday, October 16, 1998. ! have enclosed a copy of the agenda for your review and records. In addition, the minutes from the September 18u' meeting. If you have any questions regarding these meetings, please do not hesitate to contact me at: 941-403-2463. Veo' truly yours, Ray Bellows Principal Planner (CLG CoeJ;linator) Ili'itoric PrcscrvafiordRVB/rh I~¥']iSO. C orres: cc: VinccntA. Camero D2~L: Sue Filson // Ron Nino ~o~i~ Bu4~dn$ Review & Pcrminim- ~94 ] ) 403-240<) Nalurml Rc~ou rcc~ (941) 732-2~$ Code En fotccmcnl (9,11 ) 403-2440 Planning ~s (94 l) 403-23~ }lousing & Urban Improvcmcnl (941) 403-2330 Pollution Conlrol (941) 732-2502 1 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1998, IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION/Collier COUNTY GOVERNMENT, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, MEETING ROOM "C" NAPLES FLORIDA: NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECO~D OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO. BE BASED. ~ ~ ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE HAPB WILL BECOME A PERFutNENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 18, 1998 3. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4. OLD BUSINESS: A. Nehrling,s Tropical Garden B. Roberts Ranch Update C. Preservatioon Board Web Page 5. NEW BUSINESS: A. Survey and Assessment Waiver 6. DI.SCUSSION OF ADDENDA 7. ADJOURN HISTORICAL AGENDA/md MINUTE8 COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL & ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD ~leeting of September 18, 1998 Attendance: Pr~ent: Lora Jean Young, Chairman Sfaff: P~y Bellow,, Joa~ne Quinn Nancy $iemion Thl~n.t, Franchino ADe Yirgou Bill Tr,on Alexander Dusek Diane Gonzalez Other,: Ab,ent: John Thompson, Vice-Chairman The Preservation Boa~ meeting ,~as c~ll~l to o~er at 9:00 AM. ADDENDA TO AGE--A: A. N~tional aegls~r Infom~ation B. N~hrling's T~pi~l GaM~n APPROVAL OF M~ES: ~e P~e~tion Boom .o~d unanimously ~6 ~ 01 ~o ~vp~-~ th~ ~ep~mbcr 18, 1998 minu{eg. PLUG SER~CES DEPARTME~ I~PORT: in d~e Cu~nt Planning S~¢ion and may be ~*i~ting tutus. OLD BUS--SS: A. A~h~logi~l Training Results: I~ was no~ ~hat the training pn,~dM by RoLe~ Cart was a t~mendous success. Th~ Co~ty Inaction saff Ms ~ that tht~ now have a ba~e of knowledge concerning a~haeologic~l ai~s ~nd a~ifacts. B. Rob,~ R~nch Update: Ray ~ellow~ mentionM that tl~e Friends of Robe~ Ranch ~11 be going befo~ ~he BCC on October 6, 1998 wi~h Develol, n~ent funds to purchase ~.he addi/:ional land for a proposed working museum. A let. Ur ~uppor~ing tile ~lan ~o pu~hase Tract ~D~ and ~o con~e~ the ~i~ in~ a wovkin~ museum ~'as ~ent in ~uVpoa of tl~e p~j~. In addition, several members a~l ~o a~end tl~e n~ting on October 6th ~ lend C. Preae~ation BoaM Web Pa~: No new information was p~en{,.t at d,i~ time. Thi, i~au. will be discu~ when John Thongs, son reCuv, xs t,y the next nx~ting. ~W BUSINESS: A. Fog For,~ Bob Ca~ conduc~ a cul~ral su~ ~d a.e.ment on ~e ,ubj~t p~pe~y I~ in fbe Golden Ga~ Eaafea ~,~ of Wil,onl ~o de~mlne if &e~ any ~main, of Fo~ Fos~r. No hi,~c agifaca a~bu~ble ~ Fo~ Fos~r ~ found. As a ~s~lf, no additional ,fudy or ~se~h ia ~qui~l. B. Su~ey and Asaeaament Waiver: h was mentionM that ~he chu~h si~ may conain the o~ginal chapel ~ha¢ may be his~Mcally. ~ificanf. AIex Duaek meneionM f~t this old chapel was mow ~o this lo~ion many years ago. It app~r~ float tl~e chapel may hi,to~lly si~ifi~nt, bow~er, ~he si~ is now 1o~ ~¢hin the City OfMa~ I,land. Alex passM out pho~, of fhe old chu~h building for fl,~ BoaM to ~ew and ~mment. h was also no~ that John ~opson had p~ously ,uges~ d~a~ <he waiver ~ ~an~ since the .itc did hoe contain significan¢ n~haeological a~ifacts. ~e P~se~atlon Boanl votM ¢o app~ve d:e wai~er. DISCUSSION OF .~DDENI)A: ,~. National I{e~i.ter Infomation: ~ra Jean l'o,,ng pas,ed out infomation con.ming the National Regi,~r p~e.. The BoaM al,o discu~.~l otl~er sou=c, of infomation niay be useful in Historic P~a~a~ion. B. Nehrling'a T~pical Ga.len: Joanne Q.inn and Diane Gon~ale~ .~I1 con.ce David I)~apao~ oMer ~o ot,~in a copy of bia repoa on Nel,~lln~', ~ar,len. N~ MEETING: Friday, Oc~ber 16, 1998 a~ 9:00 A.15I. ~(;onfe~nce Roo;. "E"} Historic P=se~'a tioW5lin ute~/VWrb ,ace mo~or~ ~orte~a ber~d sitting on ~he ~p'n, ht~d as a federal ma~hal following ~e e~lo- ~lon on the Main~, She r~collacted field hands ~moklng cigars as they works the plantatlom The propaHy remained undltturbad for mo~ t~n 70 years, except for ~lze~UHng World W~ ~ ~tandtng ara the home' fi)uadation and an mounds, which a~ also ~~ ~ing la~ Untou~ad by Ront~ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~s ~ ~ ~ O~valopmant, which ~ Dt]. m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ronto ~w Ho 's Island The charm lies in its pineapple past, histow ~ha~loglc~ P~se~ation ~ ~"~ ~ Ollbone says. "Men were Boa~. 'I ~d no tdea It would ~nn Dll~ne and ~ra ]san on.railed wl~ ~a name but t~ me, ye~" ~he relates women weren't so c~ a~ut ~Youns lin~er over qulcho al wi~ a light laud. Ihs Naples Beach and Golf . tL But ~e developer ~o~ · Club, animatedly disc~sini arbll~ly c~se ~e ~e of Iro~cally, Young's late hus- band, ~u~n~, had wor~ the lsl~d. Besides, ~y ~o cu~ent even~, ~eir ~nversa. Is a~lly bland eomp~d to for m~y ye~ ~ a W.~ loh~l~ hslpl~ pulh ~ush tiaa wands~ng from ~e ~st Ho~'s ~l~d.' : ~o ~ i~on ~at ' . fil~ of all ~ma to the ideally Yo~ says ~ when ~e lot ~abllsh~ ~e'Na~ ~s- of ~ep ~mat and ~e ~auty adjacent to ~a H0~ sl~ sold toHc ~s~. For ~l~ p~]~, of tho nea~y Gulf watom for mugMy Saooi~ ~ buyer Y~ f~sad on ~s setting s~ms far ~ress~ a de~te inte~st mo~r' of ~tch ~ removed from a tableau of ~e ~lon'a hlsto~..Ha , homo w~ b~lt. . plates, Indian mou~, a sha~ ~wod a t~m paper a~ut ~bby w~ ~a fl~t ~n~to for se~t Nazi co~unl~tlons ~a site penned by Dll~no'a and a sea ~ptaln who set~ed granddau~ter Nlcola. material used on ~a tiny island whoso name In ~adlng it, ha learned of the Sp~la~. P~da~ Poll- · ca, lnbMu~ ~a l~80a by ' alone tllicBs a reaction, characters lika Black ]ack Dev. l~d ~ment by 1~5 ye~, It ~ ~at Isle would bb Horr's ereaux, a pirate who shamed his w~ th~ pr~ cons~cflon Island, so l~med by ~ptaln mother into moving to ~ls ~ /aha Foley Ho~[ Dllbone's cbunt~ from France when ho matsH~l of ~toHc atlas In St. great-g~at-g~ndfathar. The was forced to walk ~ plank. A~ust~ as and C~tlaston, ma}ority of Ho~'s Island is Tho Herr family tree began --. Sou~ C~llffal dominated by Key Marco a ther~ and included ~e ~ptain, built m Sou~west . ~! dove opment of upscale water- aa Ohio native who moved to : For DIl~ne, ~e ~m~n~g -' ,~ front homes. But loft untouched Key West after ao~ing as a ~ by Ronto Development are wha~ colonel in ~he Civil War. He ~abby shell ape~ of a dlffb~nt ' Dilbone is certain are Ihs oldest operated a boat ~tweon his Flofld~, one that is J~aposed ~alls left standing in ~llier groce~ there and ~ Hay ne~ {o ~z'm~m develop. meat ~in8 all around it. It's County. a testament to the island where he ~w produce vizib e. she says, when one estate ~nd pineapple plantation during the "Pineapple Boom.' studs among ~e ~t~ on tho that thrivRd here from 1877 "~ere were a lot of Civil bill and pee~ out ~xambis lo 1920. War soldiers who ~allzed the Pass, th~ m~groves on one The remains of the H~rr land was open and for the tek- side of I~e Ten ~ousand ~ homestead still bears the family lng." Young explains. "It was Islands contested by ~e devel- ,t name, even as Key Marco and kind of a Westward Ho expedi- opment of Marco on the o~er. ~ Ronio Developments distances lion backwards." itself from the unintenlienal "TheI'z tho total gap between Herr returned ia Ohio in the man and: slurs, it's a place t~ ~ double entendre. '20s, selling the island for live if you ika isolation and "[I was called ttorr's island between $I0,000 and $50,000 fishing,' she says. "It's Just the Development for a long time," dollars. Dilbone says her grand. end of the world."al 'Witffnearly 80,000 entries, the National Register of Historic Places reflects the American mania for local history. But is it too Ion§? by Anne Matthews In Vermont's Green Mountains is a ~ remr~ tailed Mad Ri~er Glen, atavistic and proud of it. Mad River has generally shunned artifici~ snmv. lodge ~txes, and mauve-and-teal condos, but its diesel-powered, sin- 81e-chalr ski lit~ has danked and throbbed up General Sta& Mountain every winter since t94g-49. P,~'cently, Mad River co-op board membets thought they'd ered a perfoc~ Soth-blr~hday present:. Why not get their beloved Iifx declared a national historic site? Mad P, Jver's vin- tag~ technology is not the nation's first ski-hiU aid (in nearby Woodstock, prewar skiiers improvised a row from a Model. T engine and some very strong dothealine), but the single- dmir lift remains the lau w~rking link to a time when American downhill w'~ all q~ort and no money. Pcrfecd exulted h~lf the board. A listing in the National Register of Historic Pla~s would be an honor, a hoot. a stir- ring tribu~e. It's also free. No wa~ said other members. We do skiing, not pol.6'~ s. The gmee~nment will wrap m in red tape. What if we ¥,'ant to dismande the lif~ someda~ Could the fi.ds intenCer~? Nobody knew. Would a National P~er listing keep developers away? some '~ard mernben won- dered. Worse. murdered others, it re ght bring them in. Mad River's stru~o~e with do-it-)ourself hisroD, is one more installment in the expandin~ argument over which ;American p~ts am ~t~r-,h saving. We'~ always been a present- tense nation, impatient with distir~ctions between old and historic. During the War of t8tz, the state of Pennsylvania ~ried to tear down Independen~ H~I and sell the land to developers: in Ig53, = consotsium o£bmlne~smen nearly con- vetted Mount Vernon into a luxu~ hotel; in t96~, New York City's augtut Penn Stadon vanished in a cloud of mm-hie dust, iu site earmarked for a new underground station, a spor~s arena, and an oi~ce building. But three yeah afar ,.he Penn St=rion debacle. Congress passed a remarkable cluster of conservarion-mlnded legislation, intended to fight envi- ronmcntal degradali~n, mhurban ~pravd, and urhan renewal, those triple shock~ m ~he founda6on of na6onal mcmog'. ~e ~966 National Historic Pr~e~'ation Act created the National Register of Historic Places. adding it m the Interior Depa~menFs National Park Sen'ice. ~e National R~ister is not connected wifl~ the National %~t for Hismrlc Prese~'ation. though their aims sometime~ m~rlap. ~r the lagt thr~ decadm, the National Register hm ~come an informal hall of fame for the Amerion preser- vation ~u~. a way m stamp valued lo. les ~ Certified G~de A Historic. For thounnds of U.S. placm, a listing ~n ~em the n~t t~t thing m immortalit?; ~Nominations arrive ~en' daF" ~ys ~ro[ Shull, the ~r~nt K~r of the National R~istet A ~ister pro~ru' ~n ~ a building, a site. a stru~ure, or an obj~t. n d~rly ~iat~ with Ameri~n histog', archit~ture. a~ha~l~, engin~ring, or ~ture. Only almut sirra-including many genuino~i~es-are d~igna~ National Hmoric ~ndmar~: para of ~li~tone and l.iule Bighorn, the Alamo. the Empire Sta~e Building. thc Gnnd ~n~n-bu~ no~ the Golden Gate Bridge or the Statue of Li~rD~ By the m~t r~ent count. 6~.~ others (dinen and courthou~, kindergartens and river ~m]l~%) ~' ~11 ~istet s~ams. And ~rne m.~ pro.trim around the countu' have ~en gnn~ed determinations of eliglbillm making them sit~dn-waiting N~' ~brk State h~ the most liuin~, 3.63% the Manhall lslan~ the f~mt. four. R~ion- ~ly. the ~uth hm the mom then the heartland states, the W~t ~t. N~' Eng{and. and the mid-A~lantic. ~e National Register i~ N,werfl~l and N~werless h br~ like a womed muse over the nation's hrawiing prier- only wai~ h~ nominations and then pronoumc State historK nations bu~ at~ scr~n the man~ apphca6ons prepaid by Nation~ ~ister li.ing means public recogni,o, of hi,tone s~gnifi~nce and eligibi[in' for he(w tax credits on malor bili~ coup: it c=n kick ~ta~ the ~onomlc ~nefi~s remain in private hands So tong a.~ there ~ no federa} involvement, owner~ manage them exacdy as tbs' ch~5e ~e~ is no obligation m o~n a Register proper9' to the public or even m maintain one. "You on lift a building on the Nauonal R~ister t~ay and demolish it tomorr~'," sa)~ Billy J(~ Peyton. ~iate direc- tor of the West Virginia Universiu' Inmtute for T~hnoloD' ~m{ Industrial ArchaeoloD. Listed si~es fr~uentlv National l(eeper orthe ,~e~,s~er ca,-o~ s~,,, ~n Alexandria, Va.: Harrison Scott on RJd§e Route ~.-rcte, '9(~ncn Elgin. Iii.. ~kclded lag wln~ to turn the toric Borden milk p~am into a parldn8 lot. or v, flcn Bridg~- port. r~)nn., complai~u that tonken Erie Canal barges hlocklng Iht cie.,' ha,'bor (and a biUion-dollas rcdc'.,~Iopmcnt plan as well), thc R.c~s~ct do~ not-cannot~ntcrvcnc. "Only by imposing no regulator7 r~lulrt:menu and promislnl~ no magic mon~ or cur~." cxp[alns Marcclla Shcrfy. ~lontana's Conner state historic pmservazlon officer. 'can Iht Register both s~rve and surd.ivy." A listing is. how- ever. :a s~rious policy tool. one final defense against t'¢~rally backed sprawl or greedy devdOlXeS who--mqulm fi:der-al per- mits. ^ section ora Los Angda freeway. Route 7to. might Ix built partially unc, crground because thc Eaat LA. neigh- borhood of El g:rtnn has become :~ llst~ site. just as the rec~n(Rcglstct d~:is~on to mak~ ~igibl~ a G~rgia group of Muscogee Indian mounds a 'traditional culru~ property' l~ted a propog'd four-lane road ~ Augu~u and ,Macon. Other Regiater-dtlvco ttwloa hav~ kept the bull- dozen away from Thomas JdT~rmn'~ childhood home. saved a ravishing group of Hawaiian ix-m~yphs, and protected most ofNc~ Otkans' Fmw. h Quam~ The impulse for the National I~er gro~s from the scattered pr,:~rva6on dTorts-..ofien focused on saving fine old house-s-that aro~ b~-w~:n th~ t~o~ and the t94os. The federal gov,:rnment had alt~dy dabbk'd in public-domain pr,:~rvatlon, via th~ Antkluisi~ Act of t9o6: i~ 1935. the National Historic Sim~ A~ inmxluc, ed th~ idea of nationa! historic landmarks and ora national li~t of histuric buildings, and ob'tcc'm But pogwtu' de~:lopment prov.~ d~tructi~ that in d,~ em'ty z~,o~ th~ U,S. Confcrtnca of Mayor, and the National Ttura together pleaded for fedeeal help. The National Register. a major ~omponem of the legislation p~s,..-,4 in t96~, is one he,Ult. Register listings are a bammetee of our changing f~:lings on pre4crvation. The cattier pt~ervationist urge to ~ve bt~ildings and distrk-~s has b~:ome m alI-Azn~rican rush to recover fugitive, masg;nal, and silenced Ama'ion ~biects that oftrn tc'quine much nmmch at the local k-w,:l. About 6o percent o7 f/egistet listings am chldly of local slg- nificance: the Natlo.'~] l~ter is ~ onl]t national preser- vation effort to to ct;ns~cody hon~ local history. National Register cntri~ often begin as gram~oa initiatlv,:s, local stat~ as v, ith many other I'Xatk ~ pm, grams that deal with history, and culm~ rnaeu~gtn~.~, th~ I~t-t has a g-v~r¢ly limited travd budge't, and 'a muqris just 2z employ- ees. two-thirds ci,Al servants, one-third contract workers. who processed t.6so nominations last y~ar. But a yearning for Register recognition has dearly helped make pr~scrv'ation a genuine popular movement. Citizens take to the id~ that plac~ is a kc,/to the p~t with enthusiasm bordering on mania, ar.d the struggle for a fed- eral imprimatur is public history in the raw. an e~uixrant confirmation that history, stasu from Ixlow. The Register is crammed with adobe barns and asy~ume, ba.L--ries and boraxworks, covered bridges and college dairies, frae houses ~nd internment camps, oU wells and roofslgns, ~ ict- propulsion hBom,o~ and~ ,mdter ,t~k, t~mpl~ For Tmoisu ~nd temp[~ For Odd Fdic. If thc Na6o~ ~ster r~ at tim~ li~ a Stephen Vin- ~nt ~& ~ on steroi&, it's in ~c pan ~ of the s~Ws ~licf ~t a h~toric ~cri~n pla~ mn ~ a pre- ~}umbhn b~l ~urt or ~'cn an ~rly ~n m~l. In p~t d~de the ~ter's r~ch h~ dcli~mtdy bm~den~ to include thc ind~tri~l, the vcrn~hr, and the natu~. ~zer sk~ r~ndy npp~ed include ~ xB~ hozcl S~ Mmzm, ~i[: m s~g~ch stop in N~; ~ ~mon ~rcho~ in ~tdc ~n Indian ~I~ site in ~o~in: the ~ole of Spdn~ilie. U~: a spmcc-l~ o~ 'n Si ~, ~ N~ York Ci~s Union ~m N.C. W~th ho~ ~nd studio in C~d~ Ford, Pa.: ~nd ~IL tel~n s~dio in Phlhdelphh ~omc oFAm~ean ~cn d~ the p~z ~i~in~ily. ~e ~ter o~ a m~ing 5~r ~mff-~i~ ~ ~y ~c ~d ~ver s~ lift. built in zg~, ~ n~ ~n cli~ble stint'ut the 5~y~ mit ~ ~r From abmlute. ~ ~it~ from ~e d'7 h d 'hd I" ~l'ng more ~d more 'Mby hndm~" find their ~y onto ~bter. prBtlne :rly didos ~ing ~en ~er th~n ~lon~ bnrm ot Civil War barrack. ~ned p~mationis~ · ~ ~ ~c '~pcion G" role, sin~ thnt~ h~ ~tenti~ ~st497o sit: are I~ted in ~tet ~idelin~. ~ption G pm~ni~ r~ently nppr~ include a ~ I1 ICBM site in Piton ~un~, ~i~: Flannc~ O'~nnor~ home in Mill~g~iIle, G~.: n ~95o fll-meul pmfib ho~ in ~:tcr- ton, Ind.; F:nk U~ Wrlght's ~9S8 cidc ~nter For M~in ~un~. ~i[; the Big Duck. a roa~ide building in Suffolk ~un~ N.Y.: ~d Hv~ Pr~IQ'~ Gra~l~d mansion, ~ich ~ add~ in ~. To p~ a ~he~nt ~mpling oF~cri~ pla~. not~ ~rol ~ull, ~e ~tcr cn~u~g~ nominatiom oFl~d- ~ ~d m~ hi~oric districu, N~five ~eri~n sit~, older suburbs, commercial archit~ure, ~[d War and sp~ce- r~ce I~, ~cn ~r-cuhure sit~ li~ ~c 194o P~dena Fray, or ~nn~icut~ d~t Merrin Pa~y, or station n~r D~u~. Minn. (a r~er~ WriSt d~ign) ~cr s~y mm d~n a Bau~s~e o~ buil~ng one ~y, app~ a Mil~u~ ~ ~na ~e n~t. D~ a d~n~ nud~-~h~d plant d~ indmion? ~at a~ut an Ohio mmunnt ~ha~d li~ a ~t outrider ~? Ym ~d ~: ~1o~o~ ~ Hau wm~ plant, admi~ to the ~ter of Historic Pla~ I~t D~m~r, will ~umive only in photm ~er 2~. ~en the con~inated ~ite is to & ~. ~d ~e ~iki, in ~lumbm, Ohio, joined the ~ter I~t D~m~r. t~; i~ ~-Pol~hn fan~ ~i- {~, ~en ag~, ~nder~lly em~i~ the ~nlshing sup~r~ub ~lmm of mldcentu~, mJd~ntinent giant ~ing ~ktails and William (~r~v. 'one, sot, ~,,: Sectan Crater j n 1991, Harrison Scott of'lbrrance. Cali£. turned [cfi the many nice qm,.t si~ts still cllglbl¢ for inclusion: ship- insecad of right on a coum~, road in northern Ires Angdes wr~c~, grav~'ards, defunct mines, rrm0te onyon~. The ~unt)~ He wan ed ~o show his ~n the ~dgc Route. a f~ver ~ople invoJ~,ed in any Register bid, the ~rrer its m~e~imc ofmdy hlghwav cnginccrlt g abandm~ed for chances. Madimn. Wi*., tl~ star¢ opi~ ~d home of die 4o mn in he mountains a~vc Intestate 5. Scott's priman' Universi~, of Wixonsin is a plant mmm~lis of4~.~' hobby w~ (and is) traim, but thc rcdrcd Pacific ~11 ~tch'- bulk around five lakes, lu downtown lle~ on a na~w lng engineer. 61, ~me m f~inatcd by the lost road that he isthmus whose main arre9' k Sure Strmr, a mile-long stretch launder a six-y~r struggle ~o win it a ~ational R~ister list- ofVicrorlan ~ndsmne architecture, on~ the ~ire of violent lng. Anyone ~n nominate a site. bur hixtoric-pr~n, arlon Viemam protests, now an ex~nsivdy ~nky m x of dress ~mmitt~ in =ch sta~e ~pital must give approval ~fore ~hops. craft oudeu, and coffcehou~s. ~en Madi~n~ tin' fo~rding ~ndidare files ro ~Shsifingron for a National Reg- planners, aided by ~he sta~e his~ori~ ~:ie~. deeded to ' ister y~ or nay within 45 da?5. nominate Sta~e Street to the National R~ter in Janua~ 'The pa~ork wm ~unced back to me three tim~. ~997, th~ ~cted genera rejoicing. ~e state ~nt~ ~e~ drainage culvert and g~ station d~u- But ~th Stare St~t bmir ~ ~en md I~ d~elo~n menr~." ~)~ ~om still indignant. 'Evenr~lly we ~ttlcd on ~=nt b~l~tlc at nominating j~t ~art of the road. the 17.6 mil~ on fedenl auon~ ~cr Md und~t~ ~n; ;~ ~t a l~ting [and. But 1 ~d no id~ of thJdi~culn, of ge t ng ~mething wo~d ~ a st~pln~tone to a :~u~ m~ I~ hh- n thc Nat on~ ~stcr. A ~ouragmg, uph,lI batt e. ~ ungodO effo~. I s~nt thousands of my own mon~ on com- und~imblm ~d pr~ent infmt~ure r~r. 'lt~ crimin~, puter~nhan~d photos alone. My advice to poop e consider- criminal? shouted I~ d~elo~r ~n H~e at the public lng it: ~n'r." ' h~ring. ~d n ) hps. We don t t~ ~u. Sm~ more ~n Only the rlchnm of ri~e road's forgotten histo~ and the ~fthe ~t~ pro~rD, owne~ op~ ~e nomination, it c~ration of For~t ~n'icc archaeologists Doug Milburn di~ on fl~e s~t, m ~r feder~ ~lationg ~ng Mad~n and Mike Mcln~re kept Sco~t going ~ he ransacked closed the first ~i~onsln downtown in Io vm to ~j~ National ar~ivm at UC~ and USC. hunted down Spanish land granu. ~ister smtus-a civic ~, ob~ one ~l~r~ city inte~i~ed elderly r~iden s. haunted public hearinD, p~tion o~ccr, of no g~ d~ ~ing unpun~hed. ' tricked thc ~itm of long-gone inns. ~en rip.lied down the The Narlonal l~ister h= still other op~nenu, articulate ~nyon to I~tc a I~endaO. ~r cr~h site Before the ~dge on~. Too much inter~t-group histo~ ~im ~e intellectual Route ~s built, S~tt l~rned, Callfornla~ legislature had bl~d, some traditional schohrs warn. [~ we r~ly need to ~rlom[y cons dered splitting the sta~e north-~outh he. use honor a Chinese mining ~n,g in I~o or ~men~-histoq. crowing ~he San Gabriel mountains remained so arduous, site~ like the Nebr~s~ farmstead that insplr~ Wifla ~ther's But the ridge road, completed in x915. he'ed the geo~[itlcal A(y A,Itom;z? Libertarians and pro~r~-ri~u adv~tm often rif~ by providing the first direct link bc~veen L.A. and Bak- enfield, and ~n the route ~me a magnet for adventurers in PacerS, H~pan~Suiz~s. and Overland touring cars. ~dy to brave 627 ~n'es in just ~o mouna nop miles. ~tt~ quint h~ made him an authorin, on eadv ~lifornia auto ~lture: it h~ also broueh~ him d~llghted ~alls from nonagenarians who remcraft driving the route in their prime-and rmistance from one irate d~'elopcr who wanted see a Nadonal Register lis ng ac fedenl oppre~ion with a ~o d~troy an unlisted ~ction ~ ~hc route fnr a vast subdivi- smiling face. ('Any old rattrap c n ~ called historic if some sion. which did go in. ~ neighbor~ interest hes m fret:, mg ~ u~, pronounces con- 'At iu ~t. pr~n'ation engages thc p~t in a conve~fion sen'ative W~hin~on. D.C.. land-~ at~ornes James with the pr~m ~cr a mutual concern for the t~tturc," notes Del~ng in his recent t~k. l%p~/Mauen.) ~lli~ J. Mu~O. first Kec~r of the Nation~ ~ister. D~ a R~is~er listing mrQ' the prmtige it Much of the ~rer~ cnnvemafion with ~av's public ~<o~rs tion bac~ ~ and no. List inflation is re~. A s R~isrer mem- in ~npa& ~ main~alns an excellent ~b site bership approaches six fi~r~, teen d~ted pr~n~tlonists (h~p:ll~%cr.n~.~.lnr) wi~h lin~ on hgmri~ tourism, may wonder if b Keer r~lly is I~uer In an indmion-happy i~uding on-line int~ucfiom ro historic D~roit. ~ule. and cra..ir'~ not a ~pular qu~rion. The Na[ion~ ~rer N nmv ~ti~. ~i~on on rake a vmual tour of ~hc Georgia- a re,not American institution, m~ hard ~o attack = apple pie, ~orida Golden Cr~cnr and the ancien[ civilimfim~ of the patriotic and cheap ro run. Republicans like i:s backa~mrd Im~r Mi~ippi: [h~' can click and ~int rheit way along the gaze: [)ctm~rats approve its ~pulist impulse. Neid~er camp ante{~llum Undc~round ~iboad In addmon, d~ emlre ~ ' · Nafiooal ~ister ~ now ~'archablc hv state, or b5 s~.ue anti ' ' additional funding for ct era ~is~ory progran,s mt pan ofi~ counn., or by subj~t, or b~' a[eas of sienifi~ncc, usln~ suth millennium plans. ko~'ord~ m~ "an' oe "coll~.' But ~he Register'50h'mpian rain realism leis its ~[afl~rs be The National Register ha* hoe ~a~'d ~he 5*~lirlc~ -foul- ' ' historians a~ well as bureaucrats. Political clout may push ture or ~he passion~ of local :mdc. S~afi~rs }nncin~iv dc~riht- .done a paperwork '.'.'ins t~r more c~es. And a loose, iow-cost style A Sz,:. billion federal cleanup of the Ne'ada Te~t Site is baa kept t i~e Register out of the cultural-triage businc~s, endangering many of these structures and their associated Faced wilh an Omaha mansion and an Oak]and laundn' it debris, so johnson and his colleague, at can admit both. 'some ohserven remain skeptical, like hlsto- radiation gear. work just ahead oftbe bulldozen and deconta- rian Tov.'n~end Da;'is. who points out that although many rninatlon teams to determine which atomic-age site~ ate site, associated with the civil rights movement are in the Peg- Register-worthy. Twenty have been declared eligible and one [stet. only a handful have been designated National Historic listed: Sedan Crater. a new land formation. 3=5 feet deep and Landmarks, such a.s the Dexter Avenue church in Mont- 1.28o feet wide. created by the underground detonation of a gomcry. Ala.. ','.,here Mar n [,uther King Jr. '.sm pastor, and lo4-kiloton bomb in July 1962. Twelve million tons of earth wbere the idea for the Montgomery bus bovco, began; rose in less than a second. The result w-.u adand.w, ape so lunar King's bo,vhood home and his f~ther's church in Atlanta' and that Apollo astronauts later uacd it for Central High School in Little Rock. Ark. Johnson's interest in cataloging and preserving mexiern Too man,',, sites in the National Register. some pres<:rva- sites began during his ?~raduate-school days at the Univenlty tion professionals reluctantly warn, can overwhelm the cash- of.South Flor'da, when he learned mat the pre~ident of Ka:nt strapped state and local preservation offices that monitor State pl,~nned to pave over the soene of the t97o shootln~. historic properties (or, nd offthe Register} and r de herd on 'What will become of Wood, todd" j'ohnson wondered. "Or the fl°w °fNati°nal ID'egt~ter n°mmat °ns c°nstant Y mov ng the corner of Halght and Ashbury?' As a child o£the '5os, ap~.'ard toward eventual Washlng~on revlew. In some ~tates, carefully t~ned to duck beneath a grade-~chool de~k in case hat super,.'iso9. burden is form dab e Maxgachm. etu alone of atomic attack, forever al~er unsure if there would be a .as more than 3.oo0 Register listings. The llve. sweaty, way- ~ture to plan for. or any remnant of the past to pr~a:rve., he ard. taxpaying public can be a problem too. at least for believes Cold War sites like Sedan Crater are as e~sen rial to .ng-sighted preservation historians llke Robert E. St[pc. who ,~'nerican s~lf-knowledge as any Civil War battlefield. Placing ams ihat fragile historical areas may be Dish ,eyfied by Regis- d~em in the Register is. to him. a permanent national tcr recognitlon., pressured nto edu-talnment by, too many, reminder of how very close we came to thermonudea.r war. visitors in search ora packaged and upbeat past. Even the ~ ' ' , " · , ~ere'.etylucky, saysJohnson.tombedy, that we re not Register's role as a sprawl fighter is not unlversally approved, doing this ~,ort of archaeolog3, in our cities., The ',.*-'cb of strip malls that enrages a New Jeru:y prer, erva- A Register listing, or a try at one. may preserve beloved tionist can look just fine to nat[yin of low-density, c:m-.lovlng place~, but it frequendy alter~ the people involved, ifouly to cities like Denver or Tempe. Ariz., who would rather gave bind them mote do,ely to a view, a building, a road into that mountain views or Native American site,, foreign country, thc pa~t. El Nifio rains have brought excep- Being taken for granted is the Register'$ worst fate. 'The tionally heavy [and~lid.::z to the rnountaln~ above L0~ Angele~ Register makes it much. much harder to accelerate the this year. so Harri,~on Scott has been patiendy dmuing rocks destruction o f the American past,' says Roger Kennedy. who from the Ridge Route, o~en I;~' handl ~f~en alone, in the ha~ directed bothS~he Park Sev.'ice and the Smkhsonian'~ de:~ert northwest of Las Vegas, tour b,.z:,es trundle through the Museum of American History, "h's like the pure food and Nevada ']~'sc Site, paLuing for good vie es of thc mock towns drug laws, or child labor regulation, or rural electrification, and rea] Geiger counters of Frenchman's Flat. William John- Ali cost bIood, sweat, and tears to achio,e: ali are now so son h,Ls led several atomic tours in o,her )'ears, but these days familiar to our daily context that an unheroic generation hiflmaglnation is increaziog[y caught by a fine potential Reg- d~xzsn't understand ho'.,,' grateful it should be for this bulwark ister site caJled SMON~' Ground Zero, a 7oo-foot tower built against stupid[r?; selfishness, and rapaciv.,:" for a ~957 blast. 'It's a pristine ground zero." he gays, amazed. ~'I'he sand ail turned to trlnitrite, radioactive black ~ w illiam Gray Johnson b i rncmbcr of thc ~pbahing t-.'e ,rywhere [ 0oks like fha! whole tower turned rc'.<'arch faculty at the Univenlty of Nevada't liquid for just an instant, steel l-Ix:ams, big rivcx.~, woven Desert Research Institute.. be's also a subcontrao cables, cvervthjng, You hmk. My ,God. the power un tot for the U.S. Department of Energy, bleed here.' Quit~ a place." seven years ago to delermine Register eligibility of sltes on the At Vermont's Mad Rivet ski area. xhe ~p board is still va-st Nc'vada Test Site. a h3 go-square-mile area 8o miles from arguing. Thc National Register guiddine~ are glving some of Las Vegas During the 195o,;. the government built railroad them ideas, big ones. Maybe we've been thinking too small, bridges, airplane hangars, a bank vault, a dairy farm, and N~ard members suggest. Maybe a N:.donal Register listing for ~'.'t×x:l-frame houses there, a whole simulated wortd to be onr ski llft isn't quite.., enough. May{,: we should try to bombarded then 'm~dicd. landmark the whole district. Tbe whole mountain. Octol, er l, 1998 Bob Fernandez County Admini~rator 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. F Naples, FL 34102 Mr. Fernandez: We I~ t~bers oflhe Isles of C~pH Firc Ad~so~ Board, ,,~et on Tuesday, O~obc~ I, 1~8, which ~s our nmmally scheduled mccfinu date. Dur~ our meetin~ we dis~ssed the r~nlly ~s~ FY99 Budgel, f~ch i~lu~s f~s ~l~ed f~ ~ 24 h~ Cov~age Pla~ · ~ - ~. ~.~e,J by thc appt-c,v~ o~lhis e~Tand~ coverage plm~ ['~t ~-e remain so~ncwhatcm~w~thatt~ ' ' * ' ' - -' * ~" sx41t m~t s~an until JanuaD* 1, 1~9. %~hiIe we und~stand lhe r~m~ns ~i~ Ibc County Adn~ni~mtor', d~i~on to' dchy implcmen~ion ~fth[s c~and~ mv~e, we ~vc chomn t,) ~k 1CFD Staffto p¢lore options that might re. it in rattier implementation ~xhile " "safety cuslfiotff tlm Courtly Adwhdstratioa We don't know what the m~tcome oft~s explorato~ etTo~ ~ill ~ certab th~ ~ acceptable ~temafive will be Fonhcombg. but we hope th~ County Ad~strafion will consider any reamnable options that Staffcomcs up cc: Dimte Flagg, Emergency Sep,'ices Chief Barbara Berry, CoIlier [ ' ' Counly Board or'Commissioners Cl'z~rman Dex:~r C~& in. Vice Chn~n,;an IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. 1 ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND MOTIONS: 3, MINUTES OF AUGUST 19'~ MEETING: Denise Smith motioned to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Dorcas Howard and carried unanimously, 7. OLD BUSINESS A. VWth reference to the renewal of Mike McGee's contract for landscape architectural services, Denise Smith moved to accept the proposed contract; seconded by Dorcas Howard and carried unanimously IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. ~ 6~11~ ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ATTENDANCE Denise Smith, Chairman Rita Avalos, Member Dorcas Howard, Member Cherryie Thomas, M~mb~r Russ Muller, Transportation Administrative Services Ladd Ryziw. Pub[ic Works Engineering Department Mike McGee. McGee & Associates Chuck Buckley. Commercial Land Maintenance 3.APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 16TM MEETING 4. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT 6 TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION REPORT & BUDGET UPDATE 7 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. PUBLIC COiVlMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT Next Meeting: November 18, 1998@5:00p.m, at the lmmokalee Community Center IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U. 1 6 ~ 1' ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1. The Immokalee Beautification District Advisory Committee Meeting of Wednesday, September 15, 1998 was called to order at 5:20 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Members present were Denise Smith, Rita Avalos, Dorcas Howard, and Cherryle Thomas (5:50). Also present: Joe Delate and Ladd Ryziw, Public Works Engineering Department; Russ Muller and Sheila Convoy, Transportation Services; Chuck Buckley. Commercial Land Maintenance; Jacqueline Silano, recording secretary. Absent Mike McGee, McGee & Associates. 3. MINUTES OF AUGUST 19~'' MEETING: Denise Smith motioned to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Dorcas Howard and carried unanimously. 4. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A Chuck BucMey reported that the juniper on medians 1 and 2 were treated with an additional application of fungicide which seems to be effective; he recommended one more treatment to be on the safe sider Routine spraying has also been done; ali the batteries for the irrigation clocks need to be replaced and he will take care of it. He has instituted a policy for his employees to keep their boots clean so as not to transfer problems from one area to another. · BLocal residents have been using the light poles for handbills and Denise asked Chuck to have his crew remove them when spotted. 5. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT A Russ introduced Sheila Convoy, the fiscal clerk for their department. The budget status report dated August 1998 ,,',,as distributed and reviewed. With regard to the S219.75. Sheila advised that this was due to Ms. Silano's bill from last September, which was processed during this fiscal year. Russ advised that the fund balance is S31825.22. B. Russ distributed copies of a handout providing accident information for Immokatee Road and that was discussed at yesteroay's Board of County Commissioners' Meeting. A discussion regarding lo,Jr laneing Immokalee Road ensued. The project may be accelerated if the Board c!eclares it an emergency. Work could begin ~vithin four years. Ladd outlined tile proposed project which will be done in phases - 175 to C.R. 951, d,asign being completed nov; and construction to sta~ in the middle of next year; east of C.R. 951 will be done in b, vo steps. C.R. 951 to Wilson Boulew~;'d and from Wilson to Oil Well Road. During the next several months, Strategy meetings will be held regarding funding. Russ mentioned that in the interim, shoulder work may be done and tra~c lights may be installed at Wilson and Randall. C. Russ will obtain a quote for hourly rates for removal and replacement of the brickwork from a firm in Fort Myers. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding possible solutions. Regarding the stolen bricks, Russ noted that the Finance Department does not keep records over five years and he will have to look in old files for the information. D.Russ will follow up with Mike McGee regarding the broken tree grates. 6. PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REPORT A, Joe Delate introduced Ladd Ryziw, a civil engineer who will be replacing him. Joe will finish up with the Mid-Continent project . The DOT will do an inspection of the lighting and the County will prowde the DOT with the cancelled checks so they can distribute the grant funds. Mike McGee has prepared a three-page punch list for a walk-through. The contractor should do items that need to be corrected before the end of the month. B. Joe advised that the State is requiring that sod or dirt be replaced in the 20' wide utility strip between the curb and sidewalk. This area will be sand set with brick pavers soon. Denise noted that that area was in poor condition before the construction. O.Ladd advised that the bid documents for the next phase would go out next week once the funds are available. 7. OLD BUSINESS A. With reference to the renewal of Mike McGee's contract for landscape architectural ser~zices, Denise Smith moved to accept the proposed contract; seconded by Dorcas Howard and carried unanimously. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. The next meeting will be held on September 16:'. 1998 at 5:00 p,m. at the Community Center, Agenda ' " ..... ;::' PATItWAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE to the /Vap[es - Collier ,~Ietropolitan Planning Organization October 16, 1998 8:00 a.m. Collier County Development Scm'ices Center Conference Room E 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Notice: Any person wiqting to speak on any scheduled agenda item must register prior to speaking. Unless £rior permission ti .~ecured, comments should be limited to five minutes. Any per~on desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a d~criptton and summary of the item to the MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator at lea. It 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled meeting of the PAC. Any person deciding to appeal a decision of lhe Committee will need a record of the proceedings pertainlng thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbattm record of the nroceedin include~ the lestlm .... .t _..,~ .... g nade, which record o,.;, .,,,,, cvmence upon wmclt the appeal t~ to be based. 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA Norr $ S 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Hancock / Constantine / 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mac'Kle / Berry 4. OLD BUSINESS [lOBe 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Walk Our ChiIdren to School Day Event Recap B. Scrapping the LDC Requirement for Sidewalks on Both Sides of All Streets-- an Item for Consideration by the Collier County Planning Commission C. Recreational Trails Program--A New Funding Source blisc. Cortes: D. Bike/Ped News--A Call for Submissions Date: Copies To: · 6. CORRESPONDENCE 7. LITERATURE 8. ENGINEERING LITERATURE 9. ADJOURN MINUTES PATDWAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE to the NAPLES - COLLIER COUNTV MPO DATE: Friday August21. 1598 TIME: 8:00 a.m. PLACE: Conference Room E Development SeBqces BJdg. 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Naples, Flor~da 34104 PAC MEMBERS MPO STAFF Cher Compton ABS Jerem,:' D. Battis Arnold DeHart X Ken Heatherington George Dondanville X William Durmuck ABS Christopher Hagan ABS Anita L. Jenkins X Theodore p. Litwin X Tristan Stev.'art X County Personnel City Personnel Art Dobberstein, Public Schools Transportation George Archibald, Naples Trm.sportation Ed Kant, Transportation Services (1) Russ Muller, Transportation Services FDOT _Members of the Public none Doreen Vachon, east Naples CALLED TO ORDER: 8:10 a.m. PRESIDING: Theodore Litwin, Vice Chairman 1 Note: The September meeting of the PAC was not held due to closure of County offices for preparation of Hurricane Georges. To facilitate approval of August minutes, they are reprinted here. I. ADDENDA TO TIlE AGENDA Ed Kant requested an opportunity' to address the PAC on a matter of maintenance responsibility and the responsiveness of Transportation Services conveyed bv Bike/Ped Program documentation. Item added as New Business 4.A. Arnold DeHart requested an item on bike helmet instructional videos, item added as New Business 4.D. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes approved unanimously. 3. NEW BUSINESS Announcements The Program Coordinator announced that PAC member Rachel Metz had resigned due to schedule conflicts. A public meeting was held for residents of Sixth Street in Naples. The sidewalk project appeared to be back on track and the comment period will close at the end oflhe month. A. Addendum--Transportation Services Maintenance Responsibility and Responsiveness Kant explained that there is misperception by the Bike/Ped Coordinator and the PAC as to their relationship with Transportation Services. Kant said that he relies on the eyes ofcitizens to call in and noti .fy his office of maintenance needs. Those needs are then olLzn addressed with a response time of less than 48 hours, depending on the urgency. His office is not geared to provide a maintenance list with a schedule for addressing each item. he explair, ed. Theodore Litwin responded that he sees his role as a citizen and member of the PAC to draw attention to the issues and communicate needs to the parties responsible. Program Coordinator Jeremy Battis asked if maintenance requests forwarded by the Bike. fi'ed Progrmn could expect the same rapid response forwarded bv citizens. Palm Drive ar,.d Glades Bird are two cases where bike lane markings are deteriorati'ng and there has been ;.m on-going request for a response. Kant responded in the affirmative and invited Battis to once again forward his request for these streets. Battis communicated that based on the investment the Bike/Ped Program is making in surveying and reporting maintenance deficiencies, it might make for more efficient use of County resources for Transportation to report what has been remedied, rather than for the Bike/Peal Coordinator to learn what has been cmnpleted through additional site visits. Kant reminded the PAC of ongoing staff'vacancies at his department, and said he could examine such an arrangement once he has more staff. K ' ant closed by saying that much of what he has reviewed lately circulated by the Bike/Ped Program--the newsletter, the minutes of meetings and memos--have unfairly portrayed Transportation Services as unresponsive. ' B. Introduction of New Member Batfis introduced Tristan Stewart. Stev,'art expressed enthusiasm to be on board the PAC PAC members and affiliates introduced themselves. ' C. Walk Our Children to School Da,., Banis explained that this national event was be ng presented locally by the Bike/Ped Program. He listed the sponsorship and prizes that have been secured. He circulated draft supporting documentation that detailed the event's categories--a hand-in-hand parent/child walk, a walking school bus. park-and-walk, and an essay contest. Support is needed by school principals to allow the Bike/Ped Progran~ to distribute inforntation and registration forms in the schools. With the help of the School Transportation Director, the Program can target a handful of schools to work closely with, Battis continued. This would mainly consist of encouraging school principals to hold the event and to try to be present at the school the day of the event to give out stickers and juice. To successfully enlist these schools, he added, the assistance of PAC members will be critical. The PAC embraced the event and the following schools were "adopted": School Sponsor Avalon Elementary Russ Muller Golden Gate Elementary Ken Heathcfington Lake Park Elementary. Anita Jenkins. George Dondanville Poinciana Elementary Tristan Stewart Shadowlawn Elementary Ted Lit,Mn D. Bike Lanes on Tamiami Trail The MPO has been coordinating efforts to have the Tamiami Trail from Collier-Seminole State Park (SR 92) to the county line designated as a state scenic highway, Battis recounted. Scenic designation gives the highway special mention on maps and provides a tourist draw, in addition to qualifying the highway for preservation considerations and highway funding soorces. Through the efforts of the Corridor Advocacy Group, the project consultant has identified a number of improvements desired within enhJmcement efforts. These include new 'dewing areas, invasive flora removal, sign and bridge replacement, and improved travel and interpretive inJbrmation. Bike lanes have been mentioned as a possibility, but the design and boundaries of such a facility have not been finalized. Battis continued. By a vote nfS-0 the PAC directed the Program Coordinator to draft a letter to the Florida Transportation Department (FDOT) requesting that bike lanes be a component of any future widening of the scenic portions of US 41. The bike lanes should be undesignated (without bike lane signs and pa',ement markings), and should stretch the entirety of the scenic highway. At the scenic highway endpoints and at the intersections of SR 29 and Sb, 92. signs should be placed reading "Bikes Using Roadway--Share the Road." the I'AC recommended. E. Addendum--ltelmet Safe'a' Videos .,".mold Dehart mentioned that he knows ora good instructional video promoting bclmet safety and recommended that the Bike/Ped Program obtain copies for local distribution. 4. OLD BUSINESS A. Work Program Update---County Commitments gattis called the PAC's attention to two documents attached to this itc n. The first, a Work Program incorporating thc construction commitn~ents of panner agencies based on adopted policies regarding the incorpnration of pathways in ruad pr )jects. was submitted to thc PAC in April Since that time. Battis continued, he has had an opponunitv to meet with County project managers and review typical road section plans. }tis findings, coupled with comments and input by the project managers, resulted in the document distributed today, a revised Work Program focusing on Count5 commitments. The revised \Vork Program contains significantly fewer patb:~a.vs than was originally expected. Battis noted. Of the man',' road seizments to be (re)constructed in the near term. only three-and-a- ball (Coumy Barn Road.'Golden ~ate Blvd. Santa Barbara Blvd. ar, ri half the lengti~ of furore I,ivingston Road) meet the intent of the Counw's Grou, lh Management Plan. Transportation Element. Traffic Circulation Sub-element sectJons, which require road (re)construction projects to include sidewalks and bike lanes. George Dondanville remarked that ifa project engineer wishes to extract an element ora capital project required by law, the "onus*' should be on the engineer seeking an exception. Itc added that improved communication between County departments and better opportunity to review and comment of road plans is needed. ' 5. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE The FDOT has been contacted regarding lack of temporary non-motorized proviskms during reconstruction of US 41 from Airport Rd to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Battis noted. 6. LITERATURE noted 7. ADJOURN Meeting adjourned at I 0:00 a.m. Prepared bx': ' -- -- Date:_A~l~. 25, . Jeremy~)' F~att~. MPO gicycle and ~"~destrian Ccordinalor ' 19e" ' ~ .\ ':~.. o~,~ztw ^,,-e:=:a~.~ I Date:A_~g.. 25, 1998 EXECUTIV SUMMARY Walk Our Children to School Day Objective: To recap the Bike/Peal Program event Walk Our Children to School Me*ting Notes D.m,. Considerations: For the first time National Walk Our Children to School September 23. 1998. was brought to Collier County. The event was meant to address the important issue of child traffic safety and independence. As the first PAC-organized event under the curt'eot Program Coordinator, the event also serves as a trial for future community-oriented " functions. Staff Recomme3:: Discussion item. Prepared by:// /~ '-~~~: O~t, $, 1998 Q.~D' B~is' l~icycle 7d ~s~an ¢°rdi~at°r I Motion:' ~S~ond by: ~ PAC A~d O~o~r 1~ !~ It~ ~ P--ROCLAMA T~Ob~ WHEREAS, Florida has been shown to be the state that could most benefit from improvements to the walking environment, with children identified as the biggest benefactors of improved safety conditions; and WHEREAS, the ~oord of County Commissioners ~s committed to the safe travel of chitdren to and from school; and WHEREAS, Collier County has been active in efforts to increase opportunities for walking as an activity and made of travel through /ts alliance with the MPa @icycle and Pedestrian Program; and WHEREAS, walking to school promotes child developmer,-, teaches independence and improves local traffic and air quality; and WHEREAS. escorting a child to school hand-in-hand is a pursuit in keeping with quality time and fatuity values. NOW THEREFORE. be it proclaimed by the Bo~'d of Coun~y~,C,.ommissioners of Colli~rCounty, Florida, that the day of 5eptem~[~- 23, ]998, be d~ig~ted os: CO~ COUN~ WALK OUR CHZLDREN TO 5~OOL DAY DONE AND aRgUED T~ 1st Day of September, I998. O~ couNT / COMMISSIONERs COLLIER COUNt, FLORIDA DWIG~Z E. I~ROCK, CLERK Walk Your Children to School Week September 21 - September 25 Goal 8 of the School Improvement Plan addresses school safety. In compliance with our plan, we witl be participating in the Walk Your Children to School Week sponsored by the Naples Metropolitan Planning Organization. Activities have been designed to enhance the awareness of students and their parents of child traffic safety and the basic challenges kids face getting themselves to school. Please discuss safety and awareness with your students this week, and encourage participation by both parents and students The following activities have been designed to emphasize safety, awareness. and integrate valuable academic skills. Monday, September 21. 199,~- Brainstorm a list of sights and landmarks children are familiar with on their walk to school. If they do not walk to school, they may think of a place they frequent on foot. (Many children walk to the park. Dells. or even the Hess station on US 41.) Students my draw a map from memo~ of their route and landmarks they pass. Which landmarks might be a safety zone if they are feeling threatened? Tuesday, September 22. 1998 - Take a count of those children who walk to school, ride the bus. and are car riders. Graph these results. You might want to add how many are car riders but couldwalk. What are the benefits of walking? Wednesday, September 23. 1998 - This is the official Walk Your Children to School Day. Parents are encouraged to participate. For those who do, we will have a sign in sheet upon arrival. The class with the most parents participating will receive 20 Dragon Dollars and a kickball game on Friday. Juice and a snack will be provided for parents on their arrival. Thursday, September 24. 199,~ -After having walked to school Wednesday, have students list ideas about their walk to school - what did [hey notice that was good? VVhat things did they notice that could be mproved? Develop a s~ory web. Friday, September 25, 1998 - Students write about their experience. When you walked to school on Wednesday, you saw many thinqs. Describe your walk to school. If students did not walk, have them describe another walk they may have taken. COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL GOLDEh GATE ELEMENTAR ~' SCHOOL 4911 20th Place. S.W. Naples. Florida 34116-5717 (941) 455-1051 Sep:~mber i6, 199~ 9, ednesd,~y, September _., Colher County Schoo s wall join the National Walk Our Children to Schoo Da)'. The purpose of this da)' i; to promote improved health and pecestrian s~fety. It is hoped that you will participate in this event by walking your child to school on this dsy. Additionall} we would ask that you consider forming a "Walking School Bus" '.,.hereby parents esc.rt not only their children Io school but also neighborh~od children as well. Faculty members will also be out on neighboring streets and McDonalds will be providing refreshments. Golden Gate Elementary is also looking for parent volunteers to serve on our Traffic Safety Committee, a group comprised of school off,cials, county transportation personm:l, members ol' the ~ollier County Sheriffs Department, and officials from the Unb,ersity of Florida. Our first meeting will be Monday, September 28 at 9:30 a.m. at the school. If intt:es~ed in serving on this important committee, please indicate below. Call Dr. James 3mspazino, principll, at 455-1051 ifyc.u should have any questions. Thank you ~, Please return to school by 'Wednesday, September 23 Yes, I would like to serve on the Traffic St ;'et)' Committee. Name .Telephone Number Student Name EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scrapping the LDC R~lniremcnt for Sidewalks on Both Obj~five: To infom the PAC ora pending comid~tion to m~i~ the LDC wi~ reg~ds to sidewalk r~ui~men~. ' ' Considerations: The Pl~ning Co~ission is ~e a~inted ~dy that reviev~ and approves l~d de~lopmmt in ~llier Cotm~ and also is charged wi~ fomulating ~e m~lam~ ehv~m~t ~ou~ revisions made to the Count's ~ning la~. ~d standards collectively kno~ ~ ~e ~d ~l~t Code (LDC). Two yem ago the previous BikOed C~rdinator, in coopmtion wi~ professional-building indus~ coalition, fomula~ a zet ofmendmenB to the LDC to make ~mrc streeB safer ~d to reduce after-the-fact at taxpayer ex~nse. amendments was a provision requiring sidewalks on new developments· For lack of enforcement, the LDC ~en~cn~ Co~ staffh~ not objected to such a l~ge num~ Of waive~ and ~d h~ granted such a l~ge n~bcr, ~at those involved in ~e pr~eas questioning thc pu~se of keeping the law on the ~. ~e Pl~mg Co~ss~on wdl en~m a ~co~on by C~rdi~or at ~etr m~mg ne~ mon~. A~is~ md ~on by mi~t be ~e deciding difference in whe~er requirement. S~ff Recommendation: ~at advocate for i~ enforcement. Prepared ~. D t: , . .. }~nd [Vote: 16GI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bt,~e/PedNews--Call for Submissions Objective: To encourage the PAC to submit contributions to the Program ~ Meeting Notes newsIetter in the form of written articles. Considerations: Bike-/PedNews, the only reguIar]y produced bike/peal progr:'.m newsletter in the state, is to begin production of its fourth issue. The newsletter is intended to be a Program newsletter and not just a Program Coordinator's newsletter. The Program Coordinator welcomes submissions in the way of ed or/als, features and news articles. ' A Bike~Ped Chairman's column spelling out the view~ and vision of leadership or members is an additional option. Staff Recommendation: That PAC members become more active in the production of Bike/PedNews and contribute submi~sion~ on a regular Tin. is. · -v . ct. 8,1995 D. Ba ,, ,icyc e =d ' ;;rJina or Mo,ino: - Ln Date: Oct. 8 1998 Ket[¢ther'~gton, AICP, l~O Coordinator ' Made by: Second by:. Vote: ., PAC Agenda October 16,. 1998 Item EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - R~rrational TraiL~ Program . Objective: To inform the PAC of a new funding source for recreational trails that may be used for bicycles ' and other non-motorized transponatinn. Considerations: The new federal transportation funding law TEA-21 v, hich replaces ISTEA, more than dcubles the amount of money dedicated to the Recreational Trails Program to $40 million :n 1999. Its increase to $50 million annually Comb'. in 2000 makes the Program an increasingly a:,'active one to Collier Unlike Transportation Enhancements funds, the Trails projects are not selected by the hiPO. And unlike safety funds in the Hazard Elimination Program, Trails funds are not administered by the stale highway deparm~ent (FIX)I). Rather the Department &Environmental Protection (DEP) through thc State Park Service administers the Program in Florida. The application period is expected to open in the spring. For 1999 DEP is awarding up to $50,000 to organizations that offer a minimum 50 percent in mashing funds. The applicant group must have a charter approved by the DEP and have an agreement with a local, state or federal entity that would have the relevant government assume perpetual responsibility for the facility should the applicant group cease to perform its maintenance agreement. Funds may be used to acquire fight of way but receive less priority in the DEP's point-$~.stem criteria which also rewards mixed uses such as shared equ~a-iun and bicycle paths. ' The primary consideration is that the trail serve primarily (or convincingly) a recreational function rather than a transportation one. This funding SOurce could serve a number of needs locally from urban greenways, to canal bikeways, to . trails through our public lands wilderness areas. The Bicycle and Pedes~ian Program is making this funding source a top priority and stands prepared to offer grant writing assistance and County sponsorship to local applicants. Barring a community submission, the Bike/Peal Program will dratt an application and recommend a matching funding source to be drawn from the County pathway account Fta,d 313. The Bike.fi'ed Coordinator advocates consideration of Fund 313 monies for conununity applications without a matching funding source, but recommends priority be given to those applicvtiuns that will ;east tax County funds. Staff Recommendations: That the PAC consider the recommendations for MPO and Count,., support of the Recreational Trails Program. That PAC members, individually draft an application for submission for 1999 .' Recreational Trails funds. Prepared ~ JotemTIS' 'B-a~s, B icycie and~ Reviewed C, ~C~oo r dI~na2te~ rOc t. 8, ,998 [~a ~on, A'I~P, M PAC Agenaa October Item&C]; T EA-21 - Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century Moving Americans into the 21st Century -- FaCt Sheet TEA-21 Home DOT Home I Fact Sheet lndex RECREATIONAL TRAILS · ..r 9971ISTEA) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 .\uthorlzatJon ISISM)* S30M $40bi ~"~?j~7[ - - -~-5~J.~l - --~O}~;f ..... -~-5-~'~-- Proqram Puroo~ Thc Recreauonal Trails Program provides funds to de',elop and malmam rccrcal;onal trails for motorized and nonmotorizcd recrcauonal trail users. Funding :"mlractauthorit? IiI03fFL ~ll2ta)] - * - - - Funds are appomoned to the S/ales b'. fl)rmuta--50% equally amomz all el ~ b e States and 50% in propor tmn to the amount momrc': ties. and off-road light trucks. [I 103¢F1(2)} ' ;'he maximum Federal share auributable to the Recreational Trails Program is 80% [23USC2061Fq Federal agenc,: project sponsors ma.',' provide additional Federal funds up lo a lmal federa share of 95%. %tales ma.,. allo:,, a programmauc malch inslead of a project level match ',',hether a prp. ate organizauon or public agenc?. [23USC206(hi( I 1} - ' ' Eligible ~rojecl categories are {23USC206(dI(2)J: dc'.relopmcnl and rehabilkation of trailsidc and tradhcad facilities and trad linkage ,. State administrative costs related to program administration (up ~o ~";, of a State's funds): and use .of recreational trads [up to 5% of a State's fund's). Uee of Fund~ States must meet rnimmum funding shares among molorized, nonmolonzed, diverse trail use [I 112fa)J: -;0% minimum for diverge trail use I of 2 09/05/9g 09:27:5,~ · State Proaram Adminis[~.tion DOT, [23USC"O6fc~( I)] - - ' ' ' ' - ' recreatmnal tra~l users, v,h~ch shall meet not less o~ten ~han once per t~sca} )ear ~u~usl 24. TEA-2: Home DOT Home Fac'Shee:~sex 09/05/98 09:27:5, CORRESPONDENCE LITEIL,\TURE Bielski. Vincc. 1998. "Two-wheeled revolution." Sierra. Pp. 44-49. Sept./Oct. Cruger. Robcr~a. 1998. "Design against crime." Dowmo~, ti Xource (Seattle). Pp. 8-9. Sept. I4-20. fliggins. Jill. 1998. "State rethinking US 41 E sidewalks." .\'aple.v Daily Ne~,'s. PlD. Sept. 7. Kircher. Rail. 1998. "Naples bo.'.', a survivor, encourages others to '.'.'ear bike helmets." Naples Daily Ne*es. v,'.vw.naplesnews.com Jul.'.' 20. Knutson. Lava'ence 1.. 1998. "Young cyclists lobby lbr a bike- friendly America." Nat~les Da/O, Nears. P4. Sept. 18. Stachov.'iak. Robert. 1998. "Yello,.,,' bike programs." Bi©'clel2S:,l. Pp. 16-19. Sept./Oct. kids pedaling along Lake Ontarto. Cycling is part of thc daily rouune irate, like It's so routine that Bicydill?. magazine declared Toronto tbr "Best C5'cling City irt North America.- an excuse to pull my bike onto the sidewalk. [)an Egan. tine of Toromo's bicy- cle planners, is wamng for mc astrldc his black com- muter bike. We exchange hellos and then lean over thc r~iling to look at thc Don River '.'alley far belcr,'< a nar- rang Ihrough the city to Lake Ontario. Up until about 50 years Don and picnicked on Its brass>' shores. But during Toromo's industrial era. t'ac- tories dumped tons of poi- [)on died. at least in the minds of locals. 'Ten years ago people hardly even Then In 1991 the city off on his bike down a steep, grassy hill. A ci~ hall bureau- orth Araerica are just beginning their battle crat in name only. Eg=n acts more like an advocate--and rides ~ fi~r a piece of the road. They want more bike lane*. like an adrenaline-addled teenager, leaving me scrambling parking accommodations in public :teas and at workplaces. to catch up. around-the, clock access to public tr; '~sportation, and stiffer The Don River ,..alley, is an example of what can happen penalties for motoris~rs who hit cycli.:rs. It all boil~ down to bicycles. Th~' can't help but get a closer look and feel lbr the not only thc daring lev.: icy. No',a: *.vid~ up to 2.000 cyclists riding the trail every day. coming l-ormidable foes--the car and its devotees, particu- the Don is once a,min on tbe minds of Torontonians. larly those in urban-planning depamnents. Even in biQ,cle- 'The trail has created a lot or'interest in restoring the (riendN Toronto. requests for ne~' bike lanes on major river.' says E~n. Volunteers working to bring back the river thoroughfares are summarily rejecsed. After all. bike lanes have planted 24.000 trees and shrubs. Tbe lilies and bul- someumes slo;v the paceofthealmig};~'car, orreducecurb- rushes planted in Chester Springs Marsh act as natural ill- side parking ibr shoppers. When =n:ophilic politicians, traf- ters. Foxes have been spotted again. 'My daughter fell into tic planners, and merchants do support bike lanes, th~' usu- the Don and didn't die.' Egan says with a laugh. 'So it has all5, ~vant to put them in parks or on quiet, out-of-thc-way din easy an . cy g not only daring few. Thc ~orc h~r~onmu~ Choir on Bikcs adds a musical touch to ac.vista. For G~mmmm~ c','chsts, however, an altogether different approach, there nccd m ? w~h d~c ll~w. And arc d~c sdttpr~laimcd ~bikcr chic~" d~cv nccd persistence, h took six a~ Chic~ United for Non-noxious ]ongyc~rs~;l'c~mp~kmmg. lbrin- Trlnsporttdon. whose 'zinc pro- stance, m conjunct Toronto to put chims ~h~t 'your bcsl orgasm times a bike hnc along d~c Prince Ed- one ~hous~nd isju~ ~hc minimum ward Viaduct. return from -So ikr m) b~g c~ucs have made Activists in Iht United States d~c {und~mcmai dcosmn d~at is have George Bush to d~ank for nccdcd m make b~kmg pa~ o~' i m~kingthcirjobcasicr. In 1991 d~c mainstream." complains _h)hn Bush signed thc IntcrmodM Sud~cc Transportation ~ehn~: director of ~hc New York Ci~' cmzcns goup Tr~- cicncy Ac~ (IST~). which declared thc interstate highway ponation Altcrnatwcs ~And that t~nd~mcntal decision i$ to system complete, ma~ng money available for other [ndw~duM cychsts aren't w~mng. Bi~'clc ~U~dsm is flo~- Ioc~l officiMs m spend some of that money on bicycle ishing, n~vhcrc ~,~ much as m Toronto. CIii'i ~tFord I bik~ ~mprovcments. The Commum~y Bicycle Network se~s up shop in I~- *There h~sn't been much organizing in thc sunbd~ income and imm~gran~ communities, ofi~ring bike-rc~ir states." says D~ve Snyd¢r. director or,he San Francisco Bi- courses (in English and Spanish) to ~housands ofpeopl~ ~d cyclc Coali,on. 'But in commumti~s whert cyclists or~- returning hundreds ~)f broken bikes to d~c sweets each year. nizcd, such ~s Scalds. Portland. Chic~, ~nd S~n Francisco. Advocacy lbr Rcspcc~ l~r Cychsts organizes street protests ~ lot more rnon~ was s~m on blkc improv¢mcn~." ~nd lobbies d~c police m crack do~x~ on rcc~css motorist. In S~n Fr~nci~o. ~hc Bi.'cie Coalition ~ew from 7(~ n Up until asl cycling docs it.' Amsterdam has :: £ound tha~ cycling rec .'~ es air and noise -.. ness of their ~?' brings folks the street, I: health, doesn't require a hank loan. and--if that's enough--is often the c That goes even for title: that aren't flat. I'm a t~ bicycle commuter in hill San Francisco. much ofit in 15 minutes and a relief on n~nf i~ warmer costs at least $& Biking, omy 20 minutes of my time. It's free. rm outside in tN air. And it gets blood u Given the advantages ofb[kin would be a wildl it's not is that most a death wish. To be sure. when the n side alw'a.vs loses: the ~. clist upon hearing my plan to take ~ spin through ManhatTan. Fall in New York is a great t~me to c ts crisp, the sky, a deep blue.'and the trees are a color. But in the hours before my ride was t{ admonmon sank in. I the whole thing off. How stupid of me to think I~oul, the leng~h of Broadway.~ from 114th Street t6 Bridge. in the company lunatic drivers, and live to ¢.'rite about it going to a deli and ordering a bagel With lox and cheese, hoping that all those calories would smother m, They didn't. So offl went down Broadway. a n~fig cabs. cars. trucks.-all of them wid~ chatty horns. I ,sm Hou, simple concept', co/ors and visibility c Seaffle's dangerous ! ..o,~,~,o,~,,~,.~ .........,~..~.~..,,.. lo~tion~":~ It incre~ our too .am hel= {rom I.~ ....... ~, .... Tem,o~ Mt te~old ~d we get to Naoles I Bontta I Marco I Florida I Soort~ I Business I Real Estate [ Neaoolltan I Rellolon I Homes Neapolitan Naples boy, a survivor, encourages others' to wear bike helmets Monday, July 20, By ~LF KIRCHE~ StaffW~ter Judy Pence'a son Jeff wa~ in a ~erious bike accident last year and N was left in a coma. Without the helmet he was wearing he probably wouldn't have survived the crash. Judy Pence has since written a book and is producing a bike safety video. Cameron Gillie~Slaff photo A year ago, almost to the day, J'eff Pence lay in a Daylon, Ohio, hospital bed under a mess of tubes and surrounded by electronic monitoring devices. A horseshoe-shaped incision was stapled shut from his left ear to the back of his partially shaved skull. Doctors had nearly turned off his brain, creating a drug-induced coma they hoped would reduce swelling of the brain and heal his injuries from a bicycling accident.. Doctors did not expect the I 1-year-old Naples boy to survive. The hospital's chaplain stood near Jeff's parents, Judy and Don Pence, Todav. Jeffi.~ laoking fnrward tn h{~ 13th birthdav on Julv 30. He is ' - - · I of 4 7/21~ 6:39 P : planning fl tr/p to visit friends and family in Indianapolis and Chicago. He's even hoping to ge~ to that Cubs game his bicycling accident kept him from la~t year. Jeff Pence tapes · scene for the safety videO at the Bike Route in Naples with Naples actress McKenzie Mor~on, 9. Producer llank Sortie on the camera and Drew Townsend holding the microphone are from The Naples Studio. Cameron G/H/e/S/off Jeffdoesn't remember his hospital stay in Daylon, Hc doesn't remember hopping on a friend of the family's bike to ride along the rolling country roads near the little town of L~banon, Ohio. He doesn't remember his brakes locking and being throw~ over the handlebars. He doesn't remember being airlifted to the children's hospital, nor the team of doctors and nurses that fought to save his life. He doesnt remember his parents ears. But Jeffis cer, ain of two things: lie wore · bike helmet. And the hike helmet is the only reason he surv/ved the ·ccident, Jeff Pence in the hospital after his accldent.'Photo courte,~y of the Pence family Judy Pence knows this too, and shes mak'ng sure other people know sum¥~x. ~nc~g~ o~cn Io w~ bike ~lmcu ~ittcn a ~k a~ut Jc~s cx~ficncc and is cu~cntly prMuc{ng a video on thc ~ncfi~ o~wcadng a bike bclmct, Both thc b~k and video arc geared toward clcmcnm~ and middle sch~l children. Since Jan~ [997, it has ~cn thc law in HoHda that kids under wear bikc hclmc~, but ,Judy Pence sccs it ~ having gone largely uncnforced. She ~ys thc ~ok and video ~lt make kids want to wear a Mtmct, regardless e~thc law, "~y kids have worn hclmct~ since they wcrc babic~ bikes, 5be sa d, bcca~c Ivc sccn what can hap~n.' Judy Pence is a physical therapist who s~clalizcs in paticn~ rccovcdn~ ~rom neurological injuries, but all her cx~dcncc couldn't hdp her that ~yin July. 'Tvc s~nt my whole linc working in ncurolo~, ~n any~dy clsc's kid. ~ would have rccogn~xcd thc problem," she said o~sccing her l~ttlc boy su~oundcd by paramcdks, his favorite b~cball ~crscy being cut ~rom his Hmp ~y, 'Td never ~hou~t about ~c word 'surreaL' but lhcrc's no other way to dcscri~ ~ing on va~don, having hc~kop~:rs and hospi~ls aH aRcr a little bike ddc." Judy Pence ho~s thc b~k, called "A Helmet Away From Heaven," ~d thc video, called "~at Ir," ~ll prevent other families ~rom hav~ng similar or worse c~Hcnccs. "When you've got problems Hkc Jc~ had, you're not sup~scd to live," she sa~d. "~c only reason he's still around is thc helmet." A~cr Jc~s rccovc~, his mo[her ~n w~dng thc cvcnL~ 1997, She knew Jeff had no mcmo~ o~ Ibc accident or Ibc days hc w~ in a coma, so she wrote do~ thc s~ci~cs ~ a mcmok for Jell' [o read. ~¢n she ~nishc~ shc Lhought she had a prct~ compiling sto~. ~hc also recalled thc wor~ o~Ohio s~tc tr~m who visited Jc~in hospial. ~¢y ~ ~d ~or a photo~ph ~th him to ~n in their no.letter to show that b~kc hclmcm can ~vc Hvcs. Judy Pence realized tMk sto~ might help s~vc thc I~c ofsomc othcr child. So she decided to publish the ~k. ~c video ~mc a~ut after deputies in Collier Coun~ approached ~cffabout s~aking in area sch~ls, l~hc did so, however, hc would have to miss n~rly a month o~sch~l. So Judy Pence decided a v~dco was in order. It will make its debut later this month in Panama City at the National Convention for School ResourceiOf'ficers, where Judy Pence will be the opening speaker. The book and video will be available for scho~ls to buy and distribute to students. The book will also be available locally. Jeffand Judy Pence will be s gnmg cop~es at Books-A-Mflhon on Saturday July 25. "It's cool because you know you get to help somebody," Jeff said of starring in and narrating the 15-minute video.! Jeff hms gotten back up on that bike a~d started riding again. I nde (my btke) a lot, he satd, every t me I go to my friends house." But never without his helmet. For more information about the book, video or speaking appearances, call 1-888-470-BIKE or 430-I072. Feedback Comments? Questions? Suggestions? E-mail thc website crew at infod&naolcsnews coin. You can aJso us~ our directory to e-m~l our st,'df directly. Or. express your opinion in a le~cr ~o the editor. Entire contents © 1998 Naple~ Dally News. All rJght~ resen/ed. Published In Naples, Florida, A 5<:rio~s Howard newspaper. 6'39 Young' CyCli t lObby f6r'. a bike-friendlY America By LAWRE~C~ L KNUTSON: ,~ "~ '," ' ~ssoci~ ~es~' ~ ,.! [] Among their alms:" mole bike racks at $cho6l$; WASHINGTON -- In a capital I more b]ke routes, mole where there are wheels within wheels, a band of youthful lob- 7'[:h~ke $11~'y education and byists made a fervent pitch ! solving environmental Thursday for wheels that can ac- i problems. tually arrive at a destination. Bi- ~ m.'cle wheela. ~, · 'We want to make America : The kids are members of the more bicyele friendly, communi- youth advisory board of Earth ty by community," said : Force, a four-year old national 13-year-old Anissa Medina. look. : nonprofit organization aimed at ing down the national mall to- promoting bicycling ar.d helping ward the Washington young people solve environ- Monument. the Capitol dome be- mental.prob ems in their eom- hind her. munities. "Biking is fun, biking is One by one they g'ol off their healthy and biking is good for bikes, pulled offthzi: ..afety the environment," said Anrit mets and repeated their mott,: Chaudhuri. 13, of Cambridge, -- "Get Out Spoke'n.' Mass. "If you bike four miles in- A~ong their aims: more bike stead of driving in a ear, you can racks at schools, more bike reduce air pollution by 15 pounds." routes, more bike safety educa- tion and solving environmental problems. Yellow Bike Pr0Fam They seem p be working in some {=uropean cities. They've be n attempted in the <an they u<<eed here.} magine you are downtown, rushing to a sity city, but meeting, no taxicab in sight, No problem--- without a pro- you find the nearest "city bike" rack, grab a coin gram for mainta- from your pocket, slip it into the ~ock mounted to one nance and of the bikes and zoom off. When you get to your replacement, the destination, you just reverse the procedure, return- project only lasted lng the bike to the next rack you see. and retrieving a few years. your deposit. Perhaps the Fantasy? Not if you are in downtown best-known modern iteration of the idea in the U.S, Copenhagen, Dennmark, home of one of the most is the PortJand Yellow Bike Project (named after the successful "free-bike" programs on ~he planet. Such color that the bikes were painted, from saddle to programs have been attempted by a vadety of spokes), which ',,,as launched In 1994. Volunteers European and U.S. communities for more than two took beat-up, worn-out bikes donated to them by a decades, and years of experience are paying off, non-profit group and did a basic refurbishing job on One of the eadiest attempts to start such a them: they made sure the brakes worked, the tires program in the U.S. was in Davis, Calif. in the late held air, and they removed the derailleurs to convert 1960s. About 40 bikes were provided to the un[var- them to one-speeds (for reliability). After painting them for easy identification and marking them as free community bicycles, the volunteers put them out on the street for anyone to use, free of charge. Tine terms were simple: use them at your own r}~..!~, leave the bike in a public place for the nex{ user, and if you want to reserve the bicycle for a short while, turn the saddle 90 degrees to ~ldicata so. Portland's program I:.ecame a model for similar programs throu?hout the United States. Boulder. C-;or.=,J: ;* in its fourth season of providing green bic'.;c4~,,; as part of its "Spokes for Folks" program. The city puts 120 bikes on the streets each spring, and rounds them up in November. In 1996. Austin, Texas put its first 24 yellow bikes on the road; now they have released over 220 bikes. Each bike has a list of do's and don't's attached to it: "Don't lock it up," "Do leave it for others to ride,' Other commun t es----including Princeton Selling advertising space helps cut the costs of the program in New Jersey; Denver, Co!or'ado; Phoenix, Copanhagen, Denmark. Solid tires on the Copenhagen bikes Adzona; Minneapolis-St, Paul, Minnesota; are practical on the city's streets. Madison, Wisconsin; and Charlotte, North 15 LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLI~T~ · BIc~..IO.J~A · ~-p~cmb~r/Octol~r 1908 ' 16gl Carolina--have developed a variety of programs, adequately mainta~mng mere, lead to a third While Portland and Phoenix each with over concern. If someone is injured because of a 400,000 residents--are among the largest cities mishap, mechanical, physical or otherwise. with active programs, tiny Box Elder, South Dakota who is liable? A free beater bike for anyone to also has a program operating with 20 bikes to serve ride can be a lawsuit waiting to happen. The its 4,000 residents. Some cities have relatively Portland program's coordinators have said "we form:41 programs, from a system of stations from feel the best solution for this potential risk is to which to take a loaner bike and return it, to "check- make sure the sponsoring entity has just out" systems constituting a virtual "bike library." enough assets to fund its current operations." Much of the success of the programs has been Cost. The expense of maintaining a durable the result of residents' eagerness to donate old fleet of hundreds of bikes is quite high: the bicycles. "People have been extremely generous. Per'[land Yellow Bike Program (YBP) earl- We get donations of old bikes every day. We've got mates its anne=,l budget at around $56,000. plenty of raw materials to make usable bikes from," This covers spare parts, trucks to retrieve the says a Madison organizer, Roger Charly. bikes for maintenance, and a warehouse to in Minneapolis, the coordinators have actually store the bikes waiting to be fixed. had to put a hold on accepting new donations as they are "awash in bikes." The Copenhagen loaner bike program has Another pro-community element has been the solved many of these problems. To deal with theft, job opportunities the programs create. Denver's the city police are able (and willing) to issue a $170 "Cheker Bikes" program, for instance, works with ticket to anybody riding one of the free bikes outside inner-city youth. The program provides them with basic bike mechanic skills, plus the training to help them develop their own businesses. In Boulder, area high school students are hired to refurbish and maintain donated bicycles. In some cases, city transportation departments have provided facilities or supplies. Local merchants and bike shops have pitched in. Local and national media have covered Portland's program, and coverage there and in other towns has been an important tool for publicizing the programs so citizens know how they work. For all their good intentions, though, these programs have met with limited success. Four intertwined challenges repeatedly arise; Theft and vandalism. By belonging to the community, the bikes seem to belong to no In Portland, Ore., the yellow bikes program means lots one, and thus invite this type of treatment, of very yellow bicycles. In the Comm¢:nity Cycling Austin has organized a "Yellow Bike Liberation Center, a refurbished bike is readied tot the road. Committee" that works to make sure the bikes stay available for use, St. Paul, which had the city's "inner circle." where ;~:~ bikes are sup- chronic theft problems dudng its program's posed to remain. A further deterrent is the deposit first three years, has issued "Bike Cards" to system used. Each bike is equipped with a simple borrowers in exchange for a $10 deposit, lock tha;[ releases the bicycle whun you insert a 20 Maintenance. This becomes a problematic Dkk (about $3) coin into it. When you reconnect the issue as the result of use and abuse. Even the bike, you receive your coin back. The value of the burliest bicycle would need air in its tires once deposit is just enough to encourage the bikes to be a week, and a check to see that the brakes returned, without discouraging ridership, says Niels are adequate. The fact that for economy's Christiansen of Cycle import Scandinavia, the sake most of the bicycles used in these pro- company that produces the bikes for the program. grams were previously intended for the The Danish bicycles themselve,~ are quite dumpster only compounds this problem, ingenious. Unlike counterparts in the U.S., the Liability. The initial condition of the bikes in Copenhagen program has enough funding to put- yellow bike programs, and the difficulties in (Continueden Page 18) Yellow Bike Program (Continued from Page 17) Christiansen related stories of The Ultimate Danish Supreme Court judges chase specially-made bicycles for riding their bikes to work each day. public use. These bicycles--which This cycling tradition has also led to cost about $500 each--are vidually development of bicycle infrastruc- matntenance-free, and the parts lure in urban areas. Bike lanes and used are incompatible with other bike-only roads give bicycles a bicycles to discourage theft. The legitimacy that is not often found in 24-inch tires are made of a solid. U.S. transportation planning. foam-like rubber that makes Developing these programs in inflation unnecessary. They feel the United States presents special like riding on 20 pounds of pres- problems. The most sedous prob- sure, but are practical on the city 1em is that in the U.S., the bicycle is streets. The seatpost is adjustable often not thought of as a viable to fit different riders, but also has a transportation method. The a~titude bolt running through the bottom of that bicycles are merely toys invites the post lo keep it from being vandalism and discourages rider- stolen. The coaster brakes on the ship, and perhaps most important bike require very little maintenance, for the funding and sponsorship of The city sells advertising space these programs, the yellow bike on the bicycles, which helps to program has yet to catch the defray the costs of purchasing and imagination of companies as a way maintenance, and has attracted for U.S. companies to advertise sponsors such as Pepsi and Coca- their products. Cola. Christiansen explained that the attraction for the sponsors was Assistant Editor Sarah Shipley contri- the 'green" image of cycling, buted to the research for this article. especially among the young. Furthermore, advertising costs are relatively cheap-about $500 per year, per bike. This compares to a rate of about $480 per month to advertise on the side of a Washing- ton. D.C. Metrobus. The marketing niche that these advertisers want to target hints at Vermont Cycle Adventure another dynamic that enables '.E~crJ~ced~e.lo.~ofC.~'clb~g'' VE£MON-/., 4 yellow bike programs to succeed. In Europe. pro-environment values C, wncd an' °~ratc' b.y three dmc Cycle are more mainstream, encouraging ~"~cc Acro.~ A~cdca cyclist David adverlisingdoilarsforbikes, and '~en. Offc. aVadctyofrkl~to~ctL¢~ A venl -Te encouraging the use of non- of all cx~x~ricncc, rklc~ rz~g¢ cv~nt~ thn~ custom ridei for ~oups or indi- automotive transport, vid~,~L~, lc~d~ of ddt: 25 milc~ up to 120 Sandnes, Norway has recently mJlc~ p~r day. A da:,' ddt ~,,id~ ~Nclc ~pperu;ddc Ic~dcr a~d ac~:lafio~ at copied the Copenhagen modeh the t,,~ rmont O,.~clc ^d,~.cn~rc,s ow~ lcd ~c (rCc~..~ 20 ~,lc) widz her t'~. ~ ~ for ~c Norwegian cities of Lillehammer ~'~c pric= ~ a sin,Cc day adult .~d ticket. Note: ~r,~r/br,,~'~'Cu,~ ~ot included in t~c and Hamar also have programs day pdc~. Bicycle clubs welcome. Rc~r','¢ yom' cycle a~ today for k~lJ"4dt~V operating, as do Offenberg, Ger- l~-oups for thc 1998 ~,.'cle s.tason. Firs~ cycle event scheduled for L~t¢ Ju..",c 1995. many and Zurich, Switzerland. 802-228-5174 P.O. Box 456, Ludlow, Vermont 05149 But perhaps the biggest differ- ence is the attitude towards bi- cycles: with a strong tradition of utilitarian and competitive cycling, Europeans see the bicycle as a legitimate resource for everyone. ENGINEERING LITERATURE This agenda packet includes a special Engineering section garnered from the latest state- of-the-practice methodology introduced at the 1998 ProBike/ProWalk conference. GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE FACILITIES COMPARISON OF 1991 AND 1998 AASHTO GUIDES General The new Guide will be twice the side of the 1991 Guide (almost 80 pages versus 44 pages), and will be in metric only. !ntroduction Emphasizes concept that al._Jl roadways should be considered as potential bicycle facilities and should be designed to be 'bike friendly." Replaces Bike Path definition with a new Shared Use definition to recognize that almost all bike paths are also used by pedestrians, skaters, joggers, wheel chairs and other non-motorized users. Chapter 'i - Planning Adds Sections on the dimensions of the bicycle, discussion on Advanced, Basic and Children bicyclists, and how to choose the appropriate facility type. Adds a Section on education programs for both bicyclists and motorists. Chapter 2 - Design Instead of just Roadway Improvements and Bicycle Paths, there are separate Sections on Shared Facilities, Signed Shared Roadways, Bike Lanes, and Shared Use Paths, plus Other Design Considerations. Reorganizes Design Chapter to go from least costly facilities (shared ~oadways) to the most costly (shared use paths). Emphasizes importance of making al._.Jl roadways bicycle c':.;;~patibl6, especially the importance of roadway width in accommodating bike traffic. W;qere parking is allowed, 3.6 m (12 feet) is recommended as the minimum width for shared bicycle and parked car usage. The Section on Signed Shared Facilities (Bike Routes) gives more guidance on why and how to designate bike routes, including guidelines on the limited use of sidewalks as bike routes and including destinations on all bike route signs. In the Section on Bike Lanes, the recommended bike lane width is 1.5 m (5 feet), with a 1.2 m (4-foot) minimum. A broken bike lane strip is added for bus stops and in advance of right turns, a second line is suggested adjacent to parked cars, and 3.3 m (11-foot) combined parking a bike lane width is allowed if properly marked, a diagram of alternative left turn maneuvers is now included, and the diamond pavement marking is eliminated and new bike only or helmeted bike rider symbols are added. In the Section on Shared Use Facilities, al~ reference to bike paths is eliminated to racognize the mu[ti-uses of these paths or trails. A minimum width of 3.0 m (10 feet) is recommended for all shared use paths. A mini~m design speed of 30 km/hr (20 mph) is retained to accommodate higher speed cyclists even though the average speed on shared use paths will usually be slower. The basis for calculating horizontal curvature has been changed from the auto side friction formulae to recognize the bicyclist's ability to lean into a turn. Super- elevation is limited to 2% to accommodate wheel chair users. The detailed design information on stopping sight distance on horizontal and crest vertical curves has been reformatted for easier use by the designer. The height of rail on structures has been lowered to the standard pedestrian hand rail height of 1.1 m (42 inches). There is a new Subsection on trail- roadway intersections, including midblock, adjacent path and complex intersection crossings, and assigning right of way. In the Section on Other Design Considerations, there is now a diagram to assist in designing skewed railroad crossings, new Subsections have been added discussing when and how bicycles can be allowed on freeways and how to design through roundabouts, the discussion on traffic signals is expanded to include a way to calculate appropriate clearance intervals fo" bicyclists and how to design for bicycle actuated signals, and a new Subsectio~'t on the importance of considering bicycle parking facilities has been added, as has a Subsection on meeting accessibility requirements. Chapter 3 - Operation and Maintenance - No significant changes. Appendix and References The review of legal status is updated to include the most recent Uniform Vehicle ' Code changes, and the list of references is greatly expanded. 'r .LININTERNATIONAL- BASCOR SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FOR REVISED blUTCD PART 9 NOTE: These char~gc$ are prgpo~ed, not ritual. They can charlae between now and when thc ,Notice of Prot~osed Rulemakin,z is oublished in November), The revised MUTCD ,,','ill have a new format. Mandatory requirements wilI be placed under the heading "Standards." Requirements thi~t are considered advisable, but not mandatory, will be placed under the heading "Guidance." Permissive conditions, in wh!ch no requirement is intended, wiIl be placed under the heading "Option." The heading "Support" will be used to identify, descriptive and/or general information) 1. The discussions contained in the following sections of the current MUTCD2 are proposed for deletion: Sections 9A-1 (Requirements for Bicyclist Traffic Control Devices), 9A-4 (Standardization of Devices), 9A-6 (Placement Authority), 9A-7 (Meanings of Shall, Should. and May), 9A-9 (Colors). The information contained in these sections can be found in Part I of the revised MUTCD (Reference will be made to where these sections can be found at begining of Part 9). 2. Two additional definitions found in 9A.3 have been proposed for Part 9. "Bicycle lane" and "shared use path" '.'.'ere not listed in the Definitions section of the Part I NTRM dated December 5. 1997 (Note: although the change will not be reflected in the NPRM for Part 9, FHWA ,.'.'ill work to ensure that final definitions relating to bicycles are consistent with those listed in the AASHTO bike guide when the MUTCD revision is published). 3. Section 9B.2 has been modified, deleting the word "overhead" in the sentence "Overhead sign clearance on bicycle trails shall be a minimum of 8 feet" to avoid confusion with ground-mounted. The FHWA believes this section is discussing ground-mounted signs on bicycle trails. In addition, the minimum sign clearance of S feet will be changed to 7 feet. We are proposing that the minimum mounting heights Ibr all signs be 7 feet as recommended in the AASHTO Roadside Design Guide. 4. Section 9B.2 (Option) has been modified to reference optional use of the ~uorescent yellow-green sign: "The Bicycle Crossing signs (WI 1-I) may i¢ biac~c on yellow background or black on fluorescent yellow-green backgroundL' ;An example of the current vs. the revised format is attached for your information. :In this discussion, the words "current MUTCD" refers to the I988 MUTCD. The word "revised" refers to the MUTCD revision. lA copy of the June I9, 1998, Final Rule on fluorescent yellow~green is included in your handouts. 5. Table 9B. 1 "Bicycle Path Sign Sizes" has been added to show the dimensions and sizes (metric as well as feet. inches, etc.) as shown in the Standard High,var Signs Book. This eliminates the need to show the dimensions and sizes in the associated text discussion. 6. In revised Section 9B.4 (The current 9B.6), the FHWA proposes modifying the text in the "Option" category, in order to clarify the intent: "The Motor Vehicle Prohibition sign may be installed at the entrance to a shared use path." 7. In revised Section 9B.6 {The current 9B-8) the FHWA proposes changing the title from es~gna ed Lane S~gns to "Preferential Bicycle Lane Signs (R3-16, 17)". 8. In revised Section 9B.7 (the current 9B-9) the FHWA proposes changing the title from "Travelpath Restriction Signs" to "Shared Use Path Restriction Sign (R9-7)". 9. in revised Section 9B.9 ~the current 9B-I 1 ) lhe FHWA proposes changing the title from "No Parking Signs" to "No Parking Bicycle Lane Signs (RT-9.9a)". 10. In revised Section 9B. 10 (the current 9B- 12) the FHWA proposes changing the title from "Lane Use Control Signs" to "Bicycle Preferential Lane-Use Control Signs (R4-4. R3- 7)". I 1. In re',' sed Section 9B 11 (the current 9B-I4) the FHWA proposes changing the title from "Bicycle Crossing Signs" to "Bicycle Crossing Warning Signs (WI 1-1 )". 12. in revised Section 9B. 12 (the current 9B- 15) the FHWA proposes changing the title from "Hazardous Condition Sign" to "Bicycle Hazardous Condition Warning Sign (WS-10)". 13. In revised Section 9B. 13 (the current 9B-16) the FHWA proposes changing the title from "Turn and Curve Signs" to "Turn and Curve Warning Signs (\V - ,2,4.5,6,7)" I4.. In revised Section 9B.14 the FHWA proposes changing the title to "Intersection Warning Signs (W2- ,2,3,4.5)". 15. [n revised Section 9B.15 (the current 9B-18) the FHWA proposes chan.~ nv the title from "Other Warning Signs" to "Other Bicycle Warning Signs". 16. In revised Section 9B. 15. in the "Option" category, the FHWA proposes adding the "Bikeway Narrows" (W5-4) and ' ' ~, ' H I1 (V7-5) s~gns as other warning signs that bicyclists should be aware of. 17. In revised Section 9B.16 (the current 9B-20) the FHWA proposes changing the title from "Bicycle Route Signs" to "Bicycle Route Guide Signs (Df 1-1)". 18. In Section 9B. 17, the FHWA proposes modifying the GUIDANCE from ~be current MUTCD to allow the optional use of the "Bicycle Route Marker" (MI-8). 19. In revised Section 9B.18 (the current 9B-22) the FH\VA proposes changing the title from "Supplemental Plaques for Route Si~s and Route :'.Iarkers' to ' Des 'nanon Asrow and Supplemental Plaque Signs for Bicycle Route Signs". 20. In Section 9C.2. the FHWA proposes changing the OPTION related to symbols and word messages stenciled in the bike lanes to GUIDANCE and revising the wording to read: "Pavement marking symbols and/or word messages should be used in the bicycle lanes. Consideration should be given to selecting pavement marking materials that will minimize loss of traction for bicycles under '.vet cond't'ons. ' 21. In section 9C.3, the FHWA proposes changing the text related to the use ora solid white line be used as an OPTION instead of the GUIDANCE in the 1988, IUTCD: On shared use paths, different types of users nl~tv be separated by a solid white tine to supplement the pavemem markings." 22. In Section 9C.4 the FHWA proposes chanmng thc title to "Markin~ of Preferenual Bicycle Lanes". Thc text in this section related to "preferential bike ane symbol has been modified from a STANT)ARD in the 1988 MUTCD to GUIDANCE:"The preferential bicycle lane symbol should be placed immediately after an intersection and other locations when needed." 23. FHWA proposes the idea of eliminating the diamond "preferential use" symbol in Part 9. Historically, this symbol has been used to ndmate exc us~ve use," but many people believe it is the symbol for an HOg' lane. Both the siun and the pavement marking are affected by this proposed change. However, we '.voul~ like to receive comments on the impact and acceptance of this proposed change before we actually revise the figures and drawings in Part 9. 24. In Section 9C.4, the FHWA proposes revising figure. Fig 9-4 "Typical pavement markings--designated bicycle lane on two way street." 25. In Section 9C.4, the FHWA proposes adding a new figure, Fig 9-7 "Typical bicycle lane treatment at right turn only lane." 26. In Section 9C.4, the FHWA proposes adding a new figure. Fig 9-8 "T,'.~ical bicycle lane treatment at parking lane into right turn only lane." 27. In Section 9C.5, the FHWA proposes changing the following from "Support" to "Option": "Optional word and symbol markings considered appropriate for use are shown in Figure 9-6." 28. In Section 9C.6 the FHWA proposes changing the title from "Object Markers on Bicycle Trails" to "Object Markers on Shared Use Paths." Also in this section, the FHWA proposes deleting the current text and adding language from Revision 5 or,he 1988 MUTCD related to hazardous roadway conditions to bicyclists: "There may be roadway situations :'.'here a drain ~rate or other roadway conditions may be hazardous to the bicyclist. IfvisibIe to the rider, the hazardous conditions may he avoided with little difficulty." 29. In Section 9C.7 the FHWA proposes a new section discussing obstructions on bikeways titled. "Markings for Obstructions on B keways" This text is related to Figure 9-7 in the current MUTCD: White marking should be applied as shown in Figure 9-9 Where a storm drain grate inappropriate for bicycle travel cannot be eliminated." 30. In Section 9D.2 the FHWA proposes changing the terminolo?¥ from "programmed signals" to '~, s'bl i y ~mlted s gnal faces." 3 I. In Section 9D.2. the FHWA proposes changing the GUIDANCE related to signal timing on bikeways to a STANDARD: "On bikeways, signal timing h~ be reviewed and adjusted to consider the needs of bicvclis s." EXAMPLE OF CURRENT VS. REVISED MUTCD FORMAT Current MUTCD Wording Revised MUTCD Wording 9C-3 Marking Patterns and 9C.3 Marking Patterns and Colors Colors The color and types of lines used STANDARD: for marking bicycle facilities The color and types of lines used shall Ia mandatory condition] be for marking bicycle facilities as defined in Section 3A-7. shall be as defined in Section 3A-7. Normally center lines would not be required on bicycle paths SUPPORT: [Supporting information--no Normally center lines would not requirement], be required cn bicycle paths. Where conditions make it OPTION: desirable to separate two Where conditions make it directions of travel at particular desirable to separate two locations, a double solid yellow directions of travel at particular line may Ia permissive locations, a double solid yellow condition] be used to indicate no line ..may be u:sed to indicate no passing or no traveling to the left passing or no traveling to the left of the line. of the line. Broken lines used on shared useGUIDANCE: paths ~hould [an advisory Broken lines used on simred use condition] have the usual 1 to 3 paths .should [an advisory segment-to-gap ratio. A nominalcondition] have the usual I to 3 3 ft segment with a 9ft gap segment-to-gap ratio. A nominal should be used. 3 ft segment with a 9ft gap should be used. 1 6C 1 CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DMSION 200 W. 14th Avenue W~LU~,~TC~ E. Wl!~ Denver, Colorado TO: .whom It May Concern F~OM: James Mackay, P.E. Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner DATE: August 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Bicycle Pavement Marking Arrow The Bicycle Pavement Marking Arrow was developed as part of the Denver Bicycle Master Plan (which was adopted unammously by City Council in June of '93.) Dm-ing the development of the plan our consultant, Desigu Ventures ,hosted a number of public meetings to solicit input. 'We also tailed to maintenance people and analyzed every bicycle accident reported by the .Police Department dUnng the preceding three years. As a result of the planning process, a number of topics regarding bike lanes bec,amc clearly evident: I) V, rnile recognizing that hasle and child bicyclists like the perceived safety o f a preferenfi, al bile lane, we also realized that advanced bicyclists axe able to ~.ve] well with traffic in a shared lane situation with rnin{mal assistance. Advanced bicyclists oftent~ne$ do not support bicycle lanes as they feel relegated to one portion of the road, impeding their ability to make left tums, swerve arotmd debris, con/Ilo'dug with right.turning motorists, eta. Given that the minimum width of bike lanes is defined as 4,' rS' --.~--- - 4. · t ~,-~: aasacent to on-street parking) in the Gu:de for the Develotrment of Bicycle Facilifi¢,~ published by the American Associat/on of State Highway Tram-portatinn Officials (AASHTO) the provision of bike lanes can result in excessive narrowing of existing lxaveled lanes. Impacts to on-street parking and potentially Iow volumes of bicycles can make the provision of bike lanes difficult to justify to other ~fion systera users. (Further ckawbacks of designated bike lanes are defined by John Forester~ author of Effective 2) Maintenance budgets, full-time employees, and equipment allola'c, cnts are typically not Lncreaaed when bike lanes are provided. Thus, while capi~.l funding may be available on a one-time basis, existing maintenance funds mu~t be u~ed to maintain and re-sla-/pe these lanes in pecpetuity. By wecluding motorized traffic fi.om this portinn of the road at all times, the "sweeping" effect from tlc air displaced by motorized traffic is lost. Th/s means th,at sand, glass, debris, etc. are likelier to accumulate on this portion of the road, necessitating additional mainmce efforts. These accumulations typically beg~n at the edge oft}a' e'ment and continue inward, forcing bicyclists closer to traffic. (A study by the Bicycle Federation of America showed that motorists will allow more cleaxance when overtaking a bicycli~ in a "shared-use" lane than they will for a bicyclist in a striped b/kc lane. Thus, the effects of accumulations of deb,~a can be more insidious when a designated bike lane has been provided.) 3) "Wr ' ' ' ong Way bicycling was one of the top thcee factors in the reported bicycle accidents. Motorists typically are not l~oking for bicyclists traveling unlawfully against traffic, particularly at intersections. On one-way sU'eets where bike lanes had been provided, some bicyclists chose to use the bike lanes provided to u'aveI against traffic. By developing the Bicycle Pavement Marking Arrow for "shared-use" lanes, we are addressing these issues: 1) While the pavement arrow indicates the travel corridor that bicyclists will likely be using, it does not relegate them to one portion of the roadway. This allows them to operate as other transportation system users on s~reets with left turn, through, and fight turn lanes - a major improvement to the awkwardness of making a left turn fi.om abike lane, or being in conflict with motorists making a fight turn across the bike lane; 2) The pavement marking arrow requires significantly less pavemt:,t marking materials, thus having less impact on future maintenance budgets. By allowing motorized traffic to use the entire lane when bicyclists are not present, traffic flows are not impeded and debris can be effectively "swept" to the edge of the road; 3) The pavement marking arrow does not provide an area for the exclusive USe of bicyclists. Each arrow reinforces the correct direction of wave l. Thus, the use of these arrows serves to reinforce the concept of cycling lawfully with traffic. At the recent Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) conference in Denver there was a bicycle facilities and planning presentation which resulted in a solid interest in the arrow. Specifications and installation details were passed out to traffic engineers from across the country. Their participation in the usage of the arrow was solicited, and their operational feedback was requested. I serve on the Nation;il Comminee on Uniform Traffic Con~'ol Devices (NCUTCD). The NCUTCD is the committee which makes recommendations to the Federal Highway Adminisla-afion (F/-/WA) on the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTC'D.) The arrow has been presented to the Pavement MaxkamgS tecl~:~,c..al committee of the NCUTCD. The Pavement Markings commiuee displayed a stroh? intcres~ in this initiiativ?. The MUTCD does not.preclude the usc of signs and pavement markings that it does not provide guidance on. Having been employed as the Bicycle Facilities Engineer for the North Carolina Depam'nent of TranslX)rtation, I can assure you that state DOTs routinely develop sta~ ~tandard sil~'a which are not contained in the Mu'rcD. In North Carolina, for example, I personally specified "Share the Road" signs and plaques which were installed with federal funding, despite the fact that these items were I~9t contained You are welcome to use this arrow for "shared lane" bicycle routes in your cornm~ity. If you have any further questions on the use of this arrow, you may reach me at (303) gaa iO2~,. file: 2I: bikearrw.mmo A~P~!_X.I~AT_E LOCATIONS FOR PLACING BICYCLE SYMBOL IN ROADWAY TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTIONS PLAN VIEW TYPICAL NORTH-SOUTH STREET ~z,.,. I 80' +/- · ' u': '~'1~'17'I :co' ' 200' +/- 9'61 I 19'61 I ! ¢ i 17'151,o't~o'i · ' 40' 2oo' +/- '6 ~l~ 200' +/- ;~o~6' I · · ,0'6' 36' 8o' -,.-/- °'[' (:"'"") ' ~o PLAN VIEW 50' [~ (':;'"-"'"} J [ <,~,,.,I , (6.~) 200' ~/- 80' ,.*-/- -- TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTIONS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION DEP~ OF PUBLIC DENVER SHARED - USE LANE PAVEMENT MARt(INO SYMBOL Material: 3mm Thick, Low Density Poly Ethylene ,' Rules and R~uiations ! Federal Register , Vol. 62. No, 6 , Thursday. January. ei~c vehicle [~) ~in%. As ~ appropriate alternative ~e]. The s~[ si~ for electric vehicle , ~ing. in~ea~in8 n~ber of ;'ehicle~ using hJ~'ay ~u~sdic:mn ~o use u~is s:~ ;s imposed. -~ ~ There were 49 commenls r~c~vod of ~ were ~decid~d. .~). ~d o~er approve ~is ~en~ent to M~CD sec,/on si~Jfi~t ~ange. A ch~ge of ~is updated version of ~e fa~ ma~ine~' ewluafion to develop ~ approp-'ate svm~l also shown below (Wll-Sa). ' s~Ml for ~ p~ng. In th* ~tefim. Request [I-Z4S(C)--Adopt-A-lti~w~ ~bis s~bol may ~ used as ~ alternale State ~d 1~1 hi~way agencies have Si~s to ~e Wi 1-5 s~bol ~ently sho~ ~e option of us~g ~e word me,sage ~is r~uest [o include a st~d~d in ~e M~. The ~A conduct~ "T~ck P~n8' sign (D~15) in sign in ~e M~CD Ior "Adopt-A- re~ on ~e "Sh~ ~e R~d wi~ coni~cQon ~ o~er general motorist ~ ray' pr~r~s Is de~ ~u F~ ~uipmem" si~ ~d. ~ on ~'ice info~a~on si~s. The word of th,~ ~de v~ces in ~e su~est~ b~e results of the study, fo~d ~at ~e mes~Be "T~ck Paring" should ~ sP, e oF si~. ~e ~c~d ~d dfivem we~ aware of the meamng ~e State ~d ]~al bi~way )u5s~ctions. pubUclty, d~m~sed p~clpaQom wo zld impose ~s~ c~t b~ sign conveyed ~d ~e appropriate R~u~t II-241(C~verhead G~ide an State ~d I~1 hi,way ~ide signs by using consistent Highway pr~. ~e ~VA Is '~ dim~onal ~ows which point upw~ds m~l~in8 ~e M~ s~tlon 2~' ~d which in,cate if ~e roadway t~s inc;ude ~nersl g~d~ce for States left or right ts denied. N[neteen of ~e follow when establtsh~g ~is [~1 th[ny comments received opposed ~is pr~. ~ Traffic Engineering Division City and County of San Francisco IMPLEMENTING SAN FRANCISCO'S BICYCLE ROUTE AND SIGN SYSTEM By Adam Gubser, Manito Velasco, and Virginia Summerell In response to a growing interest in bicycling, the City and County of San Francisco recently designed a city wide bicycle route network and a comprehensive route signing system. This paper describes the design and implementation of ti'is innovative and l'fighly successful syStem. The San Francisco Bicycle Program, working within the Department of Parking and Tre. fl:ic (DPT), is responsible for bicycle planning in San Francisco. The lm-ogram has grown over the last five years from a one-person operation. It is now staffed by a Bicy.:le Program Manager, a Planner, an Assistant Transportation Eng/neer, and two Summer Interns. This team plans, coordinates and carries out all bicycle-related projects and programs in San Francisco. One of the team's recent accomplishments was the implementation ora comprehensive bicycle route network and a sophisticated route signin8 system. CA)ALS AND OBJECTIVES One goal of the bicycle route network and sign project is to promote bicycle use by making the public more aware of the b/cycle as a legitimate transportation mode. The signs direct cyclists to follow the bicycle route network, designed to include the safest, mort direct and least hilly routes between major destinations around the City. Though most of the ~,~.work's 180 m/les are Class Ill routes, there are approximately 30 miles of Class I and Class Il bikeways The sims serve to remind motorists that they are dm'in° the ro',.4 ...:.u ..... · .... ' '~- ~ au ,I[11 t;yCllS[$ wno are traveling on official bicycle routes. In addition, they attract new bicycle riders who may be intimidated by trz. rfic, steep hills and other constraints. We expect that these goals will be realized in thc :~-v!~L "";onths, as we install more than 3,000 bicycle route signs. ROUTE NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND PUBLIC INPU l The preparation of the bicycle route network involved input from the public in a variety of formats. The firSt dragr of the bicycle rome map was prepared by the San Frand.~eo Bicycle Advisory Committee (SFBAC), whose members are appointed by and report to the City and County Board of Supervisors. In addition, the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition (SFBC) reviewed all prelim/nary plans for the network. The map was distributed for public comment. Written comments on the proposed routes were received and compiled by DPT and the SFBAC. Four i {455) S54-2300 FAX (4~$) 554-2352 2s Van Ne=l Ave. Suite 345 San Fratt¢ls¢o, CA ~f~45~ ~ public meetings were held with a total of 265 people attending and 110 letters and faxes submitted. The new sign, designed by DPT Assistant Traffic Engineer Scott Broady, is the first customizeA bicycle route sign to be al:rproved by the Cali£ornia Traffic Control Device Committee (CTCDC). It is now the approved standard numbered bicycle route sign for use by all Cali£ornia jurisdictions. The new Bicycle Rotate Signs, designated SG45 in Caltrans' Standard Sign Specification, replace the old G93 bicycle route signs. The old sign, though functional and recognizable to both motorists and bicyclists, did not incorporate any detail for direction or destinations. The Highway Design Manual suggests using supplementary arrow and destinatio,~ ~lates under the old signs as needed at high demand destinations. The new SG45's, described in detail below, provide direction, destination, and other ifformation that allows bicyclists to appreciate the sea,pc of the entire network. The anractive signs (see attached illustrations) feature a large white bicycle and route number on a green oval. At the top of the oval is a graphic of the Golden Gate Bridge over a layer of fog. The signs also include information on destinations and travel directions. Routes Jn the system are divided into two classes. Primary cross-town routes feature a full color graphic of the bridge and act as b cycle arterials. Local neighborhood routes have a green and white graphic. In addition to arrows and destinations, the bicycle community in San Francisco requested that cardinal directions be included on the sign to provide additional information to bicyclists as to the direction the route is following. Th~s information is important at tums in the route where bicyclists can sometimes be routed in a direction other then the ultimate direction ofthe route (i.e., go one block west to go north). ROUTE NUM2BEPdNG SYSTEM The numbering system is based on the Federal Highway System methodology, using odd numbers for north-south routes, and even numbers for east:-west routes. Loop~ and spurs have three-digit designations. The system is laid out on a grid with the lowest route :~umbers (5 and 2) originating in the northeast paa't of the city, progressing to the highest numbers in the southwest (95 and 98). The system also has the fleyfibility to accommodate network expansion. Route n~ Imbers were selected so that new routes can be easily inserted between exSsting ones, while m'dntalning the numerical progression. No route number duplicates a state highway number us~ in the city. The general placement for the bike signs is at route junctions and at tums within the route. Re'assurance signs are also required at long uninterrulTted segments of the route. At wide or odd-angled intersections, reassurance signs are also added at the far side. The standard height of any traffic sign is 7 feet, w~ich is appropriate for bicyclists' line of sight. Genera~y, we designed the bike signs to be posted at this height though that w~ not always possible. We had the additional constraint of minimizing the number of posts on the sidewalks to reduce cost and clutter. As a result, some signs have been posted at higher than the desired height. At STOP sign posts, for example, an extension was attached to allow bike route signs to be supported above the STOP signs. There are also several locations where two or three routes are coincident and three signs (all with different route numbers) are stacked vertically. The third sign is usually more then 15 feet high. Despite this height the sign information is still legible. PROmCT TLME LINF The original estimate for completion of the sign project was two yem's. However, given the complexity of the project and the large variety of signs, we were unable to meet this goal. A rn.unber of factors contributed to the dilay. Our Traffic Sign Division had to contend with the bike sign project in addition to their regular installation and mainter,,:nce duties. They currently maintain close to 120,000 signs with limited staffing and can become overburdened at times. To facilitate the inmallation process, we trained traffic sign installers on the bike route network and sign system. Because of staff turnover in the Sign Division, the training had to be repeated. In spite of these limitations, we still expect the entire network to be signed by Summer 1999. S_jffRVEy AND i'NSTALLATiON 'Each route in tM network was reviewed in the field to ensure that routes made sense. At this stage, we were able to identify problems like gaps, one-way streets and turn restrictions. We .eliminated gaps by making adjustments to routes. At one location, the design ora Comp;ex intersection where two one-way streets merge created an access problem for cyclists. We solved the problem by providing a bicycle channel through a median to allow through bicycle access. We addressed problems created by turn restrictions on a case-by-case basis. At most locations, we irmalled a sign with a graphic illustrating how a typical bicycle lea turn can be made by following the crosswalks. The graphic was modeled after a graphic in the California Traffic Manual. At SOme locations, "USE CROSSWALK" plates were installed in addition to the supplementary left turn instruction signs. We attempted to minimize the use of "USE CROSSWALK" plates since most bicyclists are unlikely to dismount and walk their bikes across crosswalks. In a few cases, we were able to legislatively exempt bicycles fi-om the turn restrictions. The exemptions were typically for locations where the it, ms could be made safely but were prohibited because of traffic COngestion. Working from the Bicycle Plan's Route Network Map, a database of signs was developed on a Paradox computer database. Student interns entered location, sign legend and ether pertinent information into the database. The database provided useful information :".a .,;~, zurvey technicians and was used to prepare purchase orders. It should pre~e useful in the long term for maintenance. Ifa sign is missing we can refer to this inventory to identify the type ofsign to be replaced. Final/y, the sign database was used by an engineer and a surveyor to complete a 6 month survey of the entire route. Our success to date in installing the bike route signs efficiently can be contributed to the enthusiasm of both the sign surveyor and the installer. This has been a project that everyone has enjoyed. _WORKING WITH OTHER -rUR. ISDICTIONS - SPECIAL CONCERNS Golden Gate Park, The Port of San Francisco and the National Park Service, which controls the Presidio, were among the irrternal jurisdictions to whom we presented the sign proposal. Each jurisdiction required staffreview followed by commission approval. All of the entities we approached expressed support for the proposal, which was consistent with their general plans, and indicated that the signs would be a positive addition that would improve access to their locations. However, each jurisdiction expressed concerns about the impacts of such an extensive proposal. Among the issues causing concern Were aesthetics, environmental impacts, installation and maintenance. Our proposal to these agencies was to install and malnta/n the bicyc!e route signs. We included the total number of signs, sign locations and new pole installations...M'ter a preliminary survey was completed, we presented it for their staffto review. In each case, concern was expressed about the number of signs proposed. We then negotiated for fewer signs in order to address staffs concerns while maintaining the connectivity and accessibil/ty of the basic route system. Some additional conditions arose during the negotiation process that we also had to address. For example, the Presidio has particular requirements for sign installation. For installations in dirt, 4" x 4" pa/nted wood poles must be used; installations in cement and asphalt must be a 2" sleeve-mounted galvanized steel. We worked with several entities including the Cafifomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Daly City and the City of Brisbane on sign installation issues. We applied for an encroachment permit from Caltrans to install signs on the bike routes that coincided with State Highways I, 35 and 82 within the City of San Francisco. There were a number of other locations where sign installation was required within Caltransjur/sdiction, such as the Cesar Chavez Street Circle paths. DaVy City and Brisbane are cities that border San Francisco and portions of the bike route network fell within their city limits. Both cities expressed concern about maintenance and liability for the signs. We asuared them that San Francisco would be responsible for maintenance; however, the issue of liability was more difficult to resolve. We eventually determined that the impro.vements associated with bike route system (i.e. improved road ~nditions, increased motorist awareness) could themselves reduce concerns about liability. Apart fi.om these concerns, the sign proposal appealed to Daly City and Brisbane because of its flex/bility. Each city can easily incorporate our route numbering into their own bicycle network once devel.,ped, and we will offer advice once they are ready to proceed. _FUNDING The Bike Route Net-.vork signs were funded in part through an $85,000 state gntnt the city ob~a/ned in 1993 fi.om Proposition 116 Raft Bonds. The network required installation of 3,100 signs, which we ordered for a total cost of $24,000. The City took advantage of its traffic sign contract, which based sign per unit costs on size and color. For a three-color sign at a 12"x 18'!size, the unit price according to the contract was around $8.00. Since reflectivity of the sign was not critical, conventional engineering grade reflectivity was specified. We also ordered some blank route signs for maintenance. The labor cost figures includes one sign laborer and one sign survey technician and totaled ~5,000. We also spent considerable time planning and coordinating the project. Student interns were assigned to survey portions of routes to find any unforeseen problems. They also assisted in the development of the sign database. We were also able to make route improvements or changes in the course o£our other bike path and bike lane projects, and were able to defer some costs to these projects. The planning and administrative sections of the project accounted for the remaining $16,000 of the cost. The City recently approved funding to maintain the bike signs, which have a life-expectancy of 7 years. Our best estimate, based on experience with other guide signs in the City, is that 20 percent of the signs will need to be replaced because of either vandalism, thet~ or sign deterioration each yem-. The cost of supplying and installing a sign is roughly $100. The total yearly maSntenance cost for the signs is .$60,000. ~ROMOTION A map of the bicycle route network and a description of the route signs is available in most home-s, businesses, and even on the street. In an innovative private-public pm"mership, DPT encouraged Pacific Bell to produce and include a map in the Local Area Pages o£the 1997 Pacific Bell Smart Yellow Pages. TNs is the first telephone directory bicycle route map in California and one o£the Few in the U.S. The Pacific Bell Smart Yellow Pages has provided a uni§ue opportunity to promote the bicycle route network. A publicity photo of Mayor Willie L. Brown, Jr. announcing the bicycle route map in thephone book was included in our newsletler and Pacific Bell sent it out to local media. It includes the Mayor standing in from of the Golden Gate Bridge next to the bike route sign and a,phone booth. He is standing next to a vintage bicycle while looking at the bike route map in tM phone book. Pacific Bell used this photo as a nationwide publicity campaign inforrr~g people that they can travel to SF and easily find the bike route map. Having a map in the .ehone book has been an effective outreach tool. CONCLUSIONS TNs sign project was a very labor-intensive undertaking crat~ed through neighbort,ood input, careful surveys and bicycle staffeffort and enthusiasm. It is a relatively Iow co~ but high visibility project that shows a commitment to-promoting cycling. We have alt,'.'.dy rece:vea positive feedback from bicyclists and residents. Other cities including Honolulu, Las Veg~as, Napa and Oak/and have inquired about the signs and are considering their use. We will continue to install bike paths and lanes within the network to further cycling and promote safe riding. We expect the network will encourage more peo,ple to adopt this alternative mode of transportation. Bios: Adam Gubser is a Transportation Planner with the City and County of San Francisco Department of Pm-king and Traffic assisting with the development and implementation bicycle projects and programs. His duties include Community relations, safety education and outreach, and management o£a bicycle rack in~allation program several Bay Area Ah' Quality District- funded projects and bikes on transit programs. He received a Bachelor o~' A.,-ts degree in History from San Francisco State University in I995 and has completed major course work in Geography and Urban Studies. Manito Velasco has been with the city for 3 years, the last two working on reviewing bicycle-related parking traffic issues. Among the other bicycle projects he is managing are bicycle parking for City buildings and feasibility studies of'implementing bicycle lanes on City streets. Lie received his Bachelor of'Science degree in Civil Engineering 1993 and a Masters o£ Science in Transportation Engineering in 1995 from UC Berkeley. V'u-ginia Summerell is eomple~g a Masters Degree in Geo~aphy at Sm Francisco State University and has been working with the Bicycle Program since 3t,?e, 1997, $/:6Striping Bike Lanes:.. Overcoming Implementation' Challenges ' in Urban Areas By Cara Seiderrnan Creating bicycle lanes on our roads calming; this extremely important tool should now be a matter of course. This should be incorporated in every alLY and session will review why and how to imple- town's transportation program (as it is in ~nent this goal. Cambridge), but will not be discussed in The Big Picture this paper. A street serves many functions for many Why Bicycle Lanes Cars Seiderman is users. Streets are not only travel and access Evidence of the importance of on-street Transporlalion corridors, but also public spaces where facilities to encourage and support bicycle Program Manager for people congregate, the front yards of our transportation is overwhelming. Providing lhe City of Cam- homes, places where our children pla): To physical travel facilities is the most effec- bridge, where she oversees sfreel make our cities more livable, wc need to tire way to encourage new cyclists and redesign projects and design streets to enhance the quality of recognize that cD. cling is valid rransporra- manages the Bicycle [ifc. tion. Other elements -- education, and Pedestrian Streets are Muttimodal promotion, etc. -- are also essential, but Mobility Program. M~ Seiderman frequently As travel corridors, streets must be safe the:,' cannot do as much to increase thc gives presentations and accessible to all modes. Achieving this number of people who choose to use a and workshops on is relatively cas)., when new streets are bicycle for transportation. Bicycle lanes bicycle facility designed, but it is also quite possible when help the man)' people who say they would planning, traffic calming, and livable retrofitting existing streets. Evaluation of llke to ride but do not feel comfortable on city design. She how to accommodate ail users must the streets. previously worked in include the entire available right of way The National Bicycling s!.d YValklng Denmark, where she and not assume an existing situation or Study demonstrated that blc)zle usage in analyzed pedestrian number of lanes is correct. Stardng from urban areas is directly proportionate to tht slveets and consulted scratch with the assumption that motor percentage of arterial streets with bike to municipalities on slree! redesign vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, buses and lanes. U.S. dries with high bicycling projects. She holds transit must all be accommodated, one can populations'hive 70% more b ;~.~.1~ vt, masler's degrees in build a scenario to match the tree needs, roadway mile and six time= more bike City and Regional The resulting configuration may look lanes per arterial mile. U.S. cities with Planning and Land- scape Architecture quite different from what exists -- medi- bicycle programs and networks have much from Ihe University of ans may be removed, lanes narrowed or higher usage rates, and many European California, Berkeley. eliminated -- but eventually the new cities with these elements have even model will become what is expected in higher rates. road design. Only by building a truly muhimodal system will we achieve a Why Are We Not Doing This comprehensive transportation system. Today? Safe and comfortable coexistence on Until recently, bicycling was not taken streets can also be achieved by traffic seriously in the United States. While this BICYCLE FEDERATION OF A~ERICA - PEDESTRIAN FEDERATION OF A/~ERICA 33 DEVELOPING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES BY DESIC~N is certainly changing -- witness, among cyclists. Motorists tend to hug the right of other things, the z-sources allocated thc road, and there is not enough comfort through the Federal Highway Administra- Ievel to attract new c~llsts. At the mini- tion or ISTEA, as well as increasing mum, where there is enough room for numbers of cyclists, cities and states with wider outside lanes but not enough for full programs, and bicycles sold -- there are bicycle lanes (say, only 2-3 feet additional challenges that we must meet in every room), ~gulde lines' should be established; proiect, these arc discussed below. Perceptual Barriers Car doors and ineerscctions While to some, encouraging cycling Anotk~.' frequendy raised issue is that seems to be an ~apple-pie' issue, when it bicycle lanes force cyclists to ride next to comes to changing the way our streets parked cars, where they might get look, non-cyclists are often skeptical. This 'doored.' Cyclists are already riding in the challenge must be met with education and space between travel lanes and parked cars positive examples, it must also be put in a and will continue to do so on streets not broader context, focusing on promoting yet striped. As with ali modes oftra~c, non-polluting, non-congestion transporta- the greater the expectation of where people tion and promoting livabili .ry. will be and how they will behave, the Somewhat less expected is that some likelier that road users will reac'~ approi~ri- cyclists who are comfortable riding on the ately. Striped and marked bicyc e lanes road today do not support bike lanes remind rr:ororists to look for bicyclisu (aJthough it might be noted that the only before turning or opening a car door. This places cyclists question the idea of bike of course is not the sole means of educa- lanes are where there aren't any). A couple tion, but it is an important one. Greater of points consistendy raised in the argu- numbers of cyclists -- one of our primal/ ment against bicycle lanes need to be objectives -- will a~o help toward this addressed head on. end. The issue of the 'sweeping effect' These factors also bold true for inter- Much has been made of the issue that section design. Intersections pose chal- bike lanes keep motor vehicles off the edge lenges fo~ ~'ngineering irrespective of of the road and dirt and debris doesn't get bicycle lances. It is important to establish swept away by the wind the vehicles create, consistent expectations and reinforce safe Some people arg~ae that it is better simply beha¼or through design techniques. to have wide outside lanes that provide Research confirms that getting people to space but don't channel traffic away. look for other ?w... 5. t~'.e most important The issue of the sweeping effect is not a step tuw~:: safety; i.e., motorists looking design issue, it is a maintenance issue, before turning, and c3'clSsts slowing at Poor maintenance practices should not intersections to watch £or turning vehicles. dictate inadequate design, and there are Overcoming Physical Conslvalnts many compelling reasons for regulax street The excuse invoked ~nost often about cleaning (e.g., keeping drainage systems why bicycle lanes cannot be installed is: clear and redudng roadway deterioration). ~there isn't enough room.~ In fact, them In Cambridge, a regular street sweeping usually is room; it is simply that priority is program on ail city streets ach. loves clearer given to other uses. These may include roadways and a cleaner environment, parking or increased capaciv/for motor Allowing motorists to travel in the vehicles, or there may be a reluctance to space that should be prcMded for cyclists move curb 13.nes. If you hear ~we can't do it negates the value of the faciJJ, fies for here in [insert city name here], whcre we ~4 BICYCLE FEDERATION OF AMERICA - PEDESTRIAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA ' I~£'VELOPING I.'IVABLE ~OMMUNITIES BY,DESIGN have narrow streets," point out that ~epaved. The existing roadway (curb to Denmark, The Netherlands, and Swit-zer- curb) measured 50', which accommodated land have streets half the width and still Parking on each side and one very wide manage to establish bike facilities, travel la.ne' in each direction· Although the Even with our current priorities, them street is posted for 25 mil~ an hour, the are usually more opportunitle~ than what Wide lanes encouraged speeding, and one might first imagine. Here are some nelghbon found it difficult to cross the examples from Cambridge. sireet, a particular co'nc~m in the commcr- Huron/lvenue clal area. This wzs an opportunity to create blcyelc lanes with simple reztriplng, as Huron Avenue is an urban arterial, shown in the cross section (figure 1). primarily residential, but also passing ' Channeling motor vehicle traffic seems through a neighborhood ~5ommerclal area. Extensive water line work meant that the to have lowered speeds. ~icyclists find the $' parking lane and 5 1/2' bicycle lane roadway surface would be completely comfortable. Bicycle counts were taken /.~ /,,/y; · - ' "' c~. /, ~ ~_ '~- - .,., ~/ ~..~ T~ ~/'.... , ~=,.~ ~ Figur* 1 Huron AYenue Typical Cross Section Figure 2 Massachusens Avenue Typical Cross Section BICYCL[ F£DERATION OF A~6ERIC^ · P£DE~TRIAN FED£RA'rloN OF A~I:RICA DEVELOPING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES BY DESIGN before the lanes were striped and follow- felt crowded on the sidewalk and imper- up studies will be done to deterraine lied by crossing the wide street (over 100' whether the lanes have increased the in places). A traffic analysis led to the number of cyclists, conclusion that a travel lane could be eliminated and motor vehicle traffic could Ma~.*achusett.~ /lvenue continue to flow effectively. This enabled M:usachusetts Avenue is the city's main the plans to accommodate both widened travel corridor (average daily traffic is sidewalk~ and bicycle lanes in this section. approximately 20,000 and bicycle.~ average Beyond the central business ama, where 130/hour from 7 a.m.- 7'p.m., with a p.m. the road is 90', the sidewalks are not peak of 250/hour).Three major projects widened, a~,d where a portion of the road will combine to allow bicycle l~ne* for that runs ir* front of MIT carries higher almost half the avenue, approximately two traffic volumes, parking will be eliminated miles. The work is occurring in pha~es, from one side to accommodate four travel starting in 1996.Two segments of the road lanes. are shown in thc accompanying figures 2 Guide lines: an alternative and 3. In thc first section of roadway, a 90' Where bike lane~ cannot be imple- right of way originally accommodated four mentcd -- e.g., where it is determined that 1 t' travel lanes (two in each direction) and parking or travel lanes have priori~ -- 8' parking and 15' sidewalks on each side. guide lJncs are an alternative. Guide lines, x, Vhile it was not immediately clear how to also known as edge lines, are a technique incorporate bicycle facilities, the opporm- with which traffic engineers are familiar, nir7 wa~ revealed when the segment that and refer to "guiding" motorists, not runs through Central Square wa~ analyzed, cyclists. The llne is created on the right Central Square is a major commerdal edge of the roadway, at the point where the area, surrounded by dense residential are~ proper lane width for thc motor vehicle is and home to City Hall, other municipal created from the center of the road (see scrvlces and a subway stop. A primary goal figure 4). This keeps motorists away from for reconstructing Central Square was to the right edge (either of curbs or parked improve conditions for pedestrians, who cars) and gives more breathing room to thc I~gur. 3 Central Square/Massachusetts Avenue Typlca[ Cross Section BICYCtE FEDERATION OF AMERICA · PEDESTRIAN FEDERATION~ OF, AMERICA road, not on the sidewalk, ~nfl fllrectlon~l arrows help minimize wrong-way riding. .... When to Install Bicycle Lanes c~ ,,' ................. and Guide Lines Bicycle facilities need to be incorpo- ................. rated into all transportation and roadway ~ != ,.~ .,.:-.~ i-L~ reconstruction projects. This is most i:'~-~ '~":'5:.'.. effectively done bv establishing general ;~7;. ........... _!,'7 ........... ",-- '.--' -' g~idelines that are assumed along with the -:-."------ .~ ......... := .... .--: plans for roadway reconstruction. The reconstruction need not be major but Figure 4 Typlcol Roadway Markings wi~h might be pavement mait,,..mancc or ~dge Lines resurfacing after utility work. cyclist often creating an effective equix-a- On some streets, bicycle lanes can be lent to a bicycle lane. The space be~'een painted within the existing right of way the line and the curb is not marked, without any other changes. This has been because thc cyclist need not necessarily accomplished on halfa dozen streets in ride within thc iinc, as it is not a lane. This Cambridge, primarily one-way streets is far more effective than the traditional where there are no other existing mark- wide outside lane, and cyclists in Cam- ings. Figure 5 shows the general guidelines bridge have been enthusiastic about how for typical roadway markings with bike streets with guide lines Function. lanes. Educating the Public Conclusion Educating the public in general about 'vVhen streets are reconstructed, oppor- the rules of the road for cyclists, and runities for achie~4ng multiple goals may particularly motorists about how to share arise that may not be at first obvious, it is the road effectivel); is a key element of important to include ail goals at the successFully integrating cycling into thc beginning of any project. There are other urban environment. Toward that end, issues, such as technical design details, Cambridge has published educational that need to be addressed when creating materials and engages in public discussions bicycle lanes; while this paver could not be about the value of cycling as transportation comprehensive, there is va(bclent experi- in the city and about traffic safeD' in general. The primary, publication is a free map that includes safety information and promotes walking, cycling and public transportation. A section on sharing the road and how bicycle lanes work is in- cluded, o Wihbi I I i pi p pi ...... t cyc eanes n ace, eo c see --- -'- --"- ---.::.'--. ....... how thc?' work and are more accepting of them than when they were an unknown. Now In Cambridge, people not only expect ~'7.~..~..-~..~..---z them, but are eager to see more. .,------- m ::'.= ~ '~""--'~-" .... Bicycle lanes demonstrate that bicycles belong on the road. The lanes also teach F~gu~e S Typical Roadway Markings with .cyclists that they are expected to ride in the Bike Lanes BICYCLE FEDERATION OF A6'~ERICA · PEDESTRIAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA DEVELOPING LIVABLE COMMUNtTIES BY DESIGN ence and c:x?er'~s¢ to assist communities ~z?~,~ a;.zd24 ~ D~ ~z~i~;, U.S. Dcp~- ~nning to create be~er urb~ enHron- ment o~r~sportafion, Federal Highly merits. Ad~s~tion, 1992-1994. Ore~n Bilk and Redett~an Plan, Oregon SeJe~ed References D~tment o~r~sponafion, 1995. Bi~.ck Sa~ ~lated ~$earch S~t~s, U.S. Sa~ of Cycl~t~ in Urban ~reas: Dan~h Depmmcnt o~r~sportafion, Federal E~ientts, Tr~c S~c~ and Endronment, Highly ~miNs=ation, 1995. ~ad Directorate, Dedm~k Minis~ of FloridaB~ckFarillt~;PlannlngandDesi~ Tmsport, 1994. Manual (Training Dra)), Florida Dcp~tment Si~ up~r the bi~: De,i~ Manual)r a Cycle- ofTransportafion Sffe~ O~ce, 1996. F~dly ln~as~uctum, Cen=e for Rese~ch and ~n Impr~d Tra~ Environmen{: ~ C~Mo~e Con~a~ St~d~d~fion in Ci~ ~dT~c ffldem, Road Data La~nto~, R~d S t~- Enginee(; g, ~e Ne~erl~ds, 1994. dards Didsion, Road Di~ctorare. Dem~k Urban and Suburban B/ffck CompatDility Street Minis~ of Tr~spo~, 1993.. Eval~tion Using Bilk 8t~st ~eg ~ NationalBiffcling and Walking Stu~.'Final Sorron and~omas Wflsh, Dep~ent of Tr~sportafion, MaSson. ~, 1994. 38 BICYCLE FEDERATION OF AMERICA~ · PEDESTRIAN FEDERATION~ OF AMERICA B,C CLE Design Guidance: FEDERATION OF AMERICA The Process Begins On Monday, 17 August, the US Depart- WilkinsonoftheBFAsupponedthmandaddedthat ~ ment of Transpor,~tion convened its first the development of bi%'cle-friend y and walk,'~bie meeting on developing 'design guid- streets and highways involve,s three steps: (1) de- ~PArON TO ~ ante" to accommodate bicych:s and pedestnau tcrmme ~'hen and '.,'hem o des gn For th :se u~s: M~E ?.~l~a,,.~, rave Th s pro ec'~ is mandated bv Sec on 20~ (2) detem~ine what kind of accommodationfs~ WALKAELE ~' ~l[J] of TEA-21. which reads in parc: should be provided: and C3) determine bm,' the "Ti~e Secretory, m coooero~lon with t,~e American accommodation(s'} should be designed. Given this, Association o/Stale Highway and han~portation Wilkinson suggested thc current risk a~igned to O~cic[3, ~he r. nstitute of Transportation Engineers USDOT should £ocus on (1) and (2] while other and other interested or£onizations, shot/develo~ initiatives deal t~'ith the specifics of design I n si d e o/fioo~ relo,ng to highway o~dstreet de, Jgnston- destrian Design Gu de The project ',,'ill be don,~ d~:strian Dc:.,':n Guide, Significaudv..,kA$ HTO said for Clearinghouse ........... 3 Leak-ne of American Bicyclists. Kails-to-TrailsCon- suggesting that the next steps wouid in£1ude t4iscelbny ..................... 6 the kinds of things ha might be pan oithe final munits') and having pm'~cipants develop dra,'l Toolkit .......................... 6 -guidance.' This included eveo-thing from a pr,,- proposals for the scope and content of ~he guid- .rxosal to include a design guide for pedestrian fa- ante. USDOT ~'ill compile these comments and FOOD I5 FUEL ................. 7 mcxlation of Bi%'cles and Pedestrians in the b,'- It was also suggested that thc lnternet be used stgn of Streets and tlighx~'ays' to make it possible for more groups and nd - BFA Gets Up to Speed on GIS ................. 8 range ofusersofour streetsand hi~h~-avsand ton. DC 20590, Phone: 202.366.5007. Emaih to ensure that design treatments serve all. Bill John. Fegan/~'Fmea.dot.gov · LEE COUNTY METROPOLITAN . PLANNING ORGANIZATION 9:00 A.M. Friday, October 16, 1998 ~" Council Chamber, Fort Myers City Hall · :,rr$~; ///~1 / 2200 Second Street, Foal Myers, Florida Crmstantff~ / ' I' N~c '1[. I e 'v' This meeting is open to the pubJi¢. Berry Public input ,,viI~ be taken on each topic following the staff report. Please fill out and return a speaker card if you wish to speak. CALL TO ORDER 7.* ApprovaI o£ the I998 congestion monitoring REVIEW OF MINUTES report (Chuck Bam~by) I.* Approval of minutes o£thc September 15. 199g OTHER BUSINESS meeting 8. FIHS project priorities (Chuck Barmby) OLD BUSINESS 9. Resolutions on funding for improving US 41 and I 75 (Glen Ahlcrt) 2.* Recommended 2020 Transportation Plan amend- ments in the Bonita Springs-Estero area (Glen 10. Update on division of FDOT District I (Chuck Ahlcrt) Bannby) NEW BUSINESS I 1. Public comments on topics not on thc agenda 3.* FDOT's Alternate US 4I (Metro-Fowler) Project 12. FDOT report (David Twiddy Development and Environmental Study recommendations (Mike Rippe) 13. Announccmcnlr, 14. Members' comments 4.* Advance funding agreement for the Barr/er Islands Traffic Sur,.,ey (Glen Ahlert) 15. Topics for Ihe December 4'~ meeting 5.* Appointments to the Citizen Advisory Committee 16. Information items (Chuck Barmby) ADJOURNMENT 6.* Appointments to thc Local Coordinating Board for Misc. (;0rres: the Transportation Disadvantaged Program (Julia /,AS/ Savage) Date: / Item// ./~ Copies To: RECOMMENDED 202( '' AMENDMEN'r IN TM RECOMMENOEO ACTION: Amend lhe 2020 Trans~tion Plan as re~mmended by " the TAC and CA.as described i:: A~achmen~ 2 and 5 to ~e ~ff re~ (A~chment A) for ~e 9/1~98 mee~ng ~e TAC ~ CAC r~m~tio= for ~ mae 2020 rrampo~atio. Pmh'~ from Co~ Ro~ ~ua m ~e ~IH~ ~ ~ ~ pr~t~ Io lh~ ~,at a . . . . -ta . FoIlo~g ~e pr~muoa a pubhc h~g w~ held ~ ~ ~s~ p~ of the o~ ~ts m~e at ~e h~g ~ ~ }i~ of~e ~ c~uniC~s ~at-w~e ~t~ ~ publk he~ng input ~e pmvid~ ~ A~ ~chment B. ,, b~ cut sho~ ~a~ ae ~ Co~W ~.l~ ~ to lCav~ for di~ussion, Colli~ Co~ission~ T~ Co~a~c ~d P~ela ~aio~fiw of~e ~o~ to filt~ no~-~u~ ~f ..... ~c ~u~ Bom~ Spm~ e r~d~ ~d syst~ w~lh ~c c~ p~. m r~, s~:'~ a' (A~chmea[ ~ ~mp~ng ~ nmb~ of [~ ~d ~c~ p~ ~n w~k~' '~ t' ~ ho cu~t pl~ ~d r~omm~d~ ~dm~n~ ne~o~. : Attachment A MPO 10/] 6/98 MPO 9/I 8/98) ~DO~ION OY ~O~O P~N ~M~NDM~NT~ ~ THE LEE COUN~ MPO RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the amendments to the 2020 Transporfation Plan recommended by the TAC and CAC (Attachments 2 and 5). Background The proposed plan amendments evolved from efforts by the Lee County Division of Transportation to implement the Lee County MPO's current 2020 Transportation Plan (Attachment 1), wh/ch calls for creating a new six-lane north-south arterial road between US 41 and I 75 connecting Collier County's Livingston Road with Three Oaks Parkway. Unable to identify any alignment acceptable to the Bonita Spr/ngs community, Lee County commissioned a Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study to consider a wider range of alternatives for meeting the traffic circulation needs of the area between Immokalee and Corkscrew Roads in a manner acceptable to area residents, properD' owners and land development interests. That study recommended that Livingston Road and Tree Oaks Parkway not be directly connected with each other, but that Livingston Road be connected to Imperial Street while Three Oaks Parkway be extended to Old 41 Road via StilIwell Parkway and/or Cockleshell Dr~ve. This would require through traffic to filter through Bonita Springs between Bonita Beach Road and East Terry Street on Old 41 Road and Matheson and Imperial Streets, all of which would remain two lane collector roads, instead of being consolidated onto a single multilane arterial road. Among other changes to the current plan, the study also recommended deleting the planned extension of Sandy Lane along the railroad tracks from Corkscrew Road south to Old 41 Road, and proposed that a new route be developed east ofl 75 somehow connecting Collier County Road 951 with Ben Hill Griffin Parkway between Immokalee and Corkscrew Roads, connecting with an extension of Coconut Road across I 75. The recommendations of the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study were. largely endorsed by the Lee County Board of County Commissioners in May 1997. In February 1998, Lee County asked the Lee County MPO to consider amending its 2020 Transportation Plan in accordance with the study's recommendations. Since the study area straddled the county line and the recom~ qendations affected intercounty road connections, the Naples (Collier County) MPO was invited to parlicipate in the evaluation. A joint task force was created, consisting ofmembers o?)-,:tn M~'Os' citizen and technical advisory committees plus representatives ora number of regional agencies to review the proposals and staffanalysis, and to make recommendations about amending the two MPOs' long range plans. A joint MtSO meeting and public.heating were.also scheduled to consider and adopt any plan amendments recommended by the joint task force. Current 2020 Plans (Attachment 1) The Collier County 2020 Transportation Plan Update was recently amended to call for six-laning 1 75 north of Pine Ridge Road by 2020, and to decrease the number of lanes to which the Livingston Road extension north of Immokalee Road should be widened by 2020 from six to four. This created inconsistencies with the Lee County MPO's 2020 Transportation Plan, which still calls for six lanes on Imperial Street (to which the Livingston Road extension is proposed to connect) and calls for six-laning 1 75 only north of Bonita Beach Road. The two MPOs' plans agree at the county line on four-laning Vanderbilt Beach Drive, six-lasting US 41, not widening Old 41 Road, and extending Collier County Road 951 to Bonita Beach Road as a four lane road. The Lee County MPO's current 2020 Transportation Plan also calls for six-laning Bonita Beach Road for a half-mile either side of US 41 and from Imperial Street to US 41, and four-Ianing it from I 75 to thc extension of Collier County Road 951, four-laning West Terry Street and East Terry Street west of imperial Street, four-laning Corkscrew Road from US 41 to three miles east ell 75, ' six-Ianing US 41 throughout south Lee County, and extending Sandy Lane as a two lane collector road from Corkscrew Road south to Strike Lane--as well as the aforementioned six lane connection of Three Oaks Parkw~'ay with Livingston Road via Imperial Street. No connection between Bonita Beach and Corkscrew Roads east eli 75 is currently called for. Recommended Plan Amendments (Attachments 2 and 3) The.joint task force and the Lee County MPO's standing TcclmJcal and Citizen Advisory Committees (TAC and CAC) recommended no changes to the Collier County MPO's current 2020 transportation plan. Instead, they recommended that the Lee County MPO's 2020 Transportation Plan be amcndcd to extcnd the six-lanJng eli 75 the rest of the way to the Collier County line, and that the number of lanes be re- duced from six to four on Imperial Street south of Bonita Beach Road, to be consistent with the number of lanes called for in the Collier County MPO's plan. Consistent with thc recommendations of the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study, they recommended that Imperial Street north of Bonita Beach remain a two lane collector street, and not be connected with Three Oaks Parkway. Three Oaks Parkway is recommended to be extended south to Old 41 Road via StillwelI Parkway or Cockleshell Drive, and to drop from six to four lanes south of Strike Lane. Old 41 Road is recommended to be four-Iancd from Cockleshell Drive to Terry Street, as Lee County has already programmed to do this coming year. Williams Road is recommended to be extended as a two lane collector road to the Three Oaks Parkway extension, Southern Pines Drive is recommended to be extended westward to meet Old 41 Road north of Rosemary Road, and Matheson Street is recommended to be extended both north (via Streetsboro Lane) to Strike Lane four blocks east of the Three Oaks Parkway extension, and south to Bonita Beach Road. Departing somewhat from the recommendations of the Bonita Springs Tlaffic Circulation Study, the joint task force, TAC. and CAC recommended that Matheson Street also be extended south of Bonita Beach Road a half mile, then southeastward to meet Imperial Street.~ust north of the county line. This should relieve Imperial Street of just enough local traffic to allow it to operate at an acceptable level of service through 2020 with only four lanes south of Bonita Beach Road. A two-lane east- west collector connecting this Matheson extension to Old 41 Rea? 5 asr souu~ ..£ ihe Dog Track is also recommended to be built when the land is developed. Bonita Beach Road is recommended also to be six-laned the rest of the way from US 41.to Vanderhilt Beach Drive and between Old 41 Road and Imperial Street. The TAC and CAC recommended that Corkscrew Road be six-laned all the way from US 41 to 1 75 by 2020, although the joint task force did not recommend six-laning to be justified east of Three Oaks Parkway by pro,jeered 2020 traffic volumes. 2 1 6G1 Both the joint task force and the TAC and CAC recommended that the twoqane Sandy Lane ex- tension be retained in the 2020 Transportation Plan as essential for keeping US 41 from becoming congested by 2020 by relieving it of some of the shorter, more local trips it would otherwise be forced to carry.. Howc','er, it is now recommended to cross the railroad tracks between Corkscrew and Williams Roads, and to run between US 41 and the railroad and via Production Circle to connect directly into Old 41 Road at the bend between US 41 and Strike Lane so as to form a continuous road. The short segment of Old 41 Road between the Sandy Lane extension and US 41 is recom- mended to be four-laned. The most controversial recommendation from the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study was the recommendation for a new medal road connecting Bonita Beach and Corkscrew Roads east of 1 75. Any such road would have to cross at least 2~/:~ miles of wetlands, cutti:,t~ offpart of the county's largest and most undisturbed freshwater swamp system, much of which is in the process of being acquired for preservation by the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREV,r) Trust. Field surveys in this area (Attachment 4) have documented 109 wildlife and 115 plant species, including ten animal m~d fifteen plant species listed by state and/or federal agencies as of some degree of con- ecru. Although no Florida panthers have actually been observed in the path of such a road, they have been documented nearby, and two sections of land a mile to the east are considered to be priority one panther habitat. Moreover, nearly all of the land east ali 75 between Corkscrmv and Bonita Beach Roads is designated in Lee County's comprehensive plan as either environmentally sensitive "natural resource" areas or as "density reduction/ground water recharge" areas. Consequently, another major concern was that the development of a ne',',' road through this area might stimulate irresistible pressure for urban development inconsistent with the comprehensive pl.?.n. In view of these conc{:rns, the joint task force, TAC, and CAC recommended that the feasibility and alignment of any such road be determined through studies that adequately address its environ- mental impacts, including secondary, and cumulative effects, on wildlife, wetlands, and water management. Moreover, they recommended that no access be permitted to the 3.5 ± miles between Corkscrew Road and the farm fields just north of Citrus Park inT47S R26E section 18. For purposes of predicting future travel demand and determining the t:umber of lanes such a road would require by 2020, estimating the cost of its development, ant representing it on a map--without precluding other alignment options---this road is presumed to follow Bonita Grande Drive and its extension for two miles north from Bonita Beach Road, then to jog to the northwest north of Citrus Park through T 47 S R 26 E section 18, then to run generi:lly along th{: section line just west of the power line and between Wildcat Run and Stoneybrook to meet Cori screw Road about a mile east of Ben Hill Griffin Parkway. (A direct connection with Ben Hill G.'51fin Parkway ;vas deemed no longer feasible in view of the progress of Stoneybrook'; ~'.- ,...;,.,~.,~,,.,.:.) Also recommended to be subject to the sanae environmental and access stipulations a.~ such a "Bonita Grande extension" is that part east of I 75 of any east-west road connecting it across the Interstate with the Three Oaks Parkway extension. The joint task force favored making such a connection by extending Strike Lane as a two-lane road across I 75 and through the cleared and ditched farmland in the south half of T 47 S R 25 E section 13 so as to minimize its environmental impacts. However. the TAC and CAC recommended extending Coconut Road instead, as recommended by the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study, but as a two lane road only, even though this would require crossing at least a mile of largely-undisturbed wetlands. 3 Financial Feasibility (Attachments 5-7) The road mprovement projects necessary to imp cmcnt thc recommended amendments, and those projects from the current plan that would no longer be necessary, are listed in Attachment 5, along with the estimated cost of each, in thousands .: of 1995 dollars. Thc total cost from 200I lhrough 2020 of implementing the plan would increase by an estimated 5;50,626,000 as a result of the recommended amendments. Projects which are programmed for construction by 2000 are identified as "corem'tied, and are not counted in the implementation cost. Projects in the 2020 Transportation Plan are divided into two catego~es: "feasible" projects are those which the implementing agencies should be able to fund in full from the financial resources for which projections can be made, such as local option gas taxes, local shares of allocated state and federal gas taxes, impact fees, existing municipal services benefit units (MSBUs), and tolls. The projected resources for 2001 through 2020 not required to pay for the projects identified as "feasible" are considered a "reserve" fund. The improvements required to implement the plan which are neither identified as "committed" or "feasible" are considered "reserve" projects. Since the 5;334.875,000 in reserved funds are insufficient to cover the cost of ali the "reserve" projects, an additional S125,858,000 from other sources not included in the financial resource projections will need to be found to finance these projects. The financial resource projections do not generally include uncommitted state and federal discretionary funding, future MSBU and community redevelopment agency projects, proporlionate share contributions by land developers in excess of impact fee credits, future right of way dedications, public-private joint ventures, and the like. Because the r~ommended amendments propose to reduce the cost of"resen'e' projects by an estimated $11,490,000 while increasing the cost of the 'feas'bIe" projects by an estimated 5;62,116,000, the proposed amendments would crease the total cost of all the plan's projects by less than they would the total cost of just thc plan's s~o~e projects. Offsetting these additional costs are some $44.8 million in additional revenues and cost reductions. not identified in the current plan, that can now be identified. These include the four-laning of Leeland Heights Boulevard between Homestead Road and Lee Boulevard and part of'the extension of Three Oaks Parkway north of AIico Road, which are now programmed for construction by 2000, and can therefore now be considered "committed" and excluded from the ~qan implementation cost totals for fiscal years 2001 through 2020. Another $8,568,000 worth of"feasible" improvements to connect Treeline Avenue to Alico Road is now expected to be funded with state intermodal discretionary funds, matched with Pon Authority funds· as airport access improvements. [n addition. xve now expect to receive at least $31,623,000 more in federal funds over twenty year:, as a result of this year's reauthorization of the federal surface transportation act (TE~.-TM ".", unknown amount of additional federal money over which the state exercises discr.-,onary control may also become available for improvements on I 75, SR 80, and Pine Island Road as a result of TEA-21. These offsets are expected to be more than sufficient to cover the additional cost of the proposed amendments. However, since they arc not sufficient to cover the increased cost ofthe "feasible" projects, some 5;;17,313,000 less would be available in the reserve fund. Since 5;11,4c~0,000 worth of reserve projects are proposed to be deleted or changed to "feasible" projects, the bottom line is that there would be a net 5;5,823,000 decrease in funds available to implement "reserve" project from 2001 through 2020. 4 Hurricmmo ovacuatiom Increasing the number of lanes on I 75 south of Bonita Beach Road increase its capacity to handle intcrcoumy evacuations by half. Due to the greater per-lane capacity o f freeways~ this wi~l mom than offset the rcduction in capacity on Imperial Street~Livingston Road with four lanes rather than six. Thc evacuation capacity across the county linc of these two roads, combined, ',viii increase by 18 percent. North of Bonita Beach Road, however, evacuation capacity may not be effectively increased by the recommended amendments, despite increasing the total number of north-south lanes between Terry Street and Corkscrew Road. None of the alternatives to I 75 and US 41 in the recommended amendment would have tile continuity to handle intercounty evacuation flows as an efficiently as thc continuous six-lane Livingston Road-Three O',fi. es Parkway medal called for in the current plan. Moreovcr, since most of the areas that might need to be cvacuatcd lie wes, ,3fl 75, routes parallcling I 75 to the cast are less useful and may be difficult to reach due to traffic backups on the approaches to I 75. ,.Social and economic impacts The principal social impact appears to be that of through traffic and the improvements proposed to accommodate it on the residents of Bonita Springs, particularly within the t`,vo miles immediately north of Bonita Beach Road. Considerably fewer residents would be forced to relocate, due to the recommended deletion of the six-laning of Imperial Street and/ts six-lane connection with Three Oaks Parkway from lhc plan. However, as a result, residents along Matheson Street as well as Imperial Street should expect to cxperience heavy traffic, approaching or possibly exceeding thc capacity of these two-lane streets, with its attendant noise le`,'el, dangers, and inconveniences. Backing out of driveways may well become impractical during peak traffic pcriods. Whether this situation ',`,'ill still be considered acceptable when it comes to pass remains a significant concern. Should measures to discourage through traffic from using these streets he demanded, Ic`,,els of service on US 41, Old 41 Road, and I 75 could be adversely affected. Residents along Stillwell Parkway would also be affected by increased traffic following its recom- mended four-laning and connection with Three Oaks Parkway. At least, the levels of service on their strcct should remain acceptable, and those residents south el:Strike Lane may not have to back out into fi~st-moving traffic if Cocklcshc]l Lane is four-lancd rather than Stillwcll. None of thc recommended changes is expected to have any significant effect on farmworker housing or any other minority or economically disadvantaged commanity. With ooly two lanes, Old 41 Road can be expected to become congested by 2020 through parts of the Old Bonita Springs business district between Bonita Beach Road and 'Ferry Street, 9art cularly north of Cbilders Street/Pennsylvania Avenue, in the absence ofthe contimmus multilane connection between Livingston Road and Three Oaks Parkway railed for in tile current plan. The hbo, her traffic volumes on Old 41 Road may benefit some types of businesses, but o~'. rs may fincl that many customers are discouraged by it. Pedestrian shopping activity and development as a more pedestrian-oriented neighborhood business district may also be inhibited by the trafli:. System Performance Lee County MPO staff initially coded and tested the'ce network alternatives: the current Lee and Collier MPO 2020 transportation plans network (Attaghment 1), the same network modified as recommended by the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study (Attachment 2), and the latter net`,vork `,vithout the extensions of Bonita Grande to Corkscrew Road and Coconut Road east of Three Oaks Parkway. The zonal forecasts used for these tests incorporated both the revisions approved in January for zones in the 1 75 corridor and additional very 5 recent revisions to reflect the more intense development (likely including u regional shopping center) no,,',' expected around the Alico RoacFl 75 interchange. Neither of these updates of the zonal data had yet been made at the time the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study developed its recommendations, All of these tests predicted that most of US 41 through the study area would exceed capacity by 2020. These problems were not entirely unexpected, in view of tile recent updates of the zonal forecasts to reflect the extent of development now underway and cxpoctcd in ~outh Lcc County. Generally, however, the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study proposal outperformed the current 2020 transportation plans network, especially in terms of requiring fewer miles and hours of travel, and xvith respect to related measures of user cost. fuel use, vehicle emissions, and traffic accidents (see Attachment 8) System Performance Measures Comparison). The variant of the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study recommend':'ions network without the Bonita Grande and Coconut extensions, however, generally fell in between the other two alternatives in terms of these performance measures, but would be expected to experience the most congestion. In view of these findings, Lee Count.,,' MPO staffdecided to try further to improve upon the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study proposal by eliminating excess capacity .'.md attempting to address thc capacity deficiencies, while reducing thc potential wetland and ~vildlife impacts. A second generation Ice County MPO staffproposal for refining the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study proposal ',','as presented to tile joint task force on August 19'h. I1 oulperformed tile first three alternatives on all system performance measures except free flog' speed and the number of road and lane miles, on which measures it scored worse than the others. After considerable discussion, especially of how to mitigate thc environmental impacts of thc Bonita Grande extension connecting Bonita Beach Road to Corkscrev,. Road east ofl 75, the.joint task force recommended a modified version of the Lee County MPO staff's proposed refinement of the original Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study proposal. The performance of the joint task force's recommended nclwork Js generally comparable to the Lee County MPO staff proposal from which it was derived, with thc least congestion, travel time, and carbon monoxide emissions of all alternatives evaluated to that point, but at the cost of the most road and lane miles and lowest free-flow speed. A network incorporating the modifications recommended by thc Lee County TAC and CAC has also been coded and tested by Lee County MPO staff. As shown in Attachment 8, it outperforms both the current adopted 2020 plans network and the network incorporating the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study recommendations on all system performance measures, a~though it requires more road mileage to do so. Although the recommended amendments substantially improve overall system performance, congestion can still be expected to occur within the s':udy area by 2020 on US 41 fron', immokalee Road to Old 41 Road (south end), from Bonita Beach Road to Stril e Lane, and from Coconut Road to Corkscrew Road; on the Livingston Road extension from Imnlokalee Road at least as far as the proposed east-west road connecting it with US 41 so ,'.~ ~,i t c t;~,~,nty line; on Imperial Street between Bonita Beach Road and Dean Street; and on Old 4.1 Road between Childers Street/Pennsylvania Avenue and Terry Street. The persistent congestion problem along US 41 necessitates a policy of insisting on the interconnection of local roads between adjoining developments, the creation of parallel collector roads wherever the opportunity may siill exist, and at the very least, insistence upon the development of a continuous service road system for the development fronting directly on the highway. While not congested, 1 75 is also projected to violate FDOT's level of service standard of C between lmmokalee and Bonita Beach Roads by 2020 even with six lanes. 6 Agenda' I=em #21 Attachment B MPO 10/16/98 Pu]31ic ~e~ring a~d D~cus~fon on Pro~o~ed Amendment. to the Lee County MPO 2020 Transportation Plan The Public Hearing began at 9:52 a.m. 1· Ben Nelson of Bonita Springs stated his concern was that the cu~ent plan seems to be adequate and simple. This recommended plan has a lot of intersections and a lot of places where people can fiber through [he community. I'm not sure if that is such a good idea when someone travels in that area. h seems to be fihe~ng al~ over thc place right now· 2. Fred Partin, of the Bonita Springs Utilities, and a resident of Bonita Springs, grew up {n Collier County, went there in ]958 and have been in Bonita Springs since 1981. Jt's a matter of seeing where I grew up and the changes. Many of us have seen the very same changes in this community. I have been following the traffic plans, but I can't believe that it has reached this point and that this plan is being proposed to you for adoption. It represents more of a puzzle than a traffic plan· There were people that were involved in this process that have direct and indirect conflicts with what is occurring. The majority of residents in Bonita Springs are not aware of ',,,'hat this plan contains and the impact of this plan. Once they know about it. the).' will be pretty upset. I have l:~..en pretty vocal about it in the past 11/2 years and would hope that you would take a look at this and look at the logic of it and simply just look at the plan and it truly looks like a puzzle. Some recommendations made by the MPO are very good recommendations that need to be considered. I'm not pursuing any particular path or alignment of any streets or intersections, but I think it is important that we are able to move the traffic through Bonita Springs area because we know it's going to be here, especially in 2020· There is no reason to put it off and that means you have got to connect the Three Oaks alignment with Livingston and means that there is going to be something east of 1-75, whether it is 951 or another alignment. I think this particular plan put before you really isn't going to meet the needs of the future and until we are all impacted by the changes in the growth of the future, a new plan will not be adopted. Sc I am very concerned that you reevaluate this proposed alignment and let's plan ~'er the future so that we continue m ha'~e a nice 3. David Piper, Jr. agreed with Ben Nelson, Jr. and Fred Panin. He represents the old 41 property owners of Bonita Springs. Maps are real interestln., :LLi", %ut they are road· It really perplexes me when we have aH this expertise and intelligence on these boards that wou~d want to drop two more roads and drop thousands and thousands more cars per day onto an already falling class road. It just doesn't make sense. I also want to bring everybody's attention to the redevelopment on old 41. We have had a little bit of a problem for people signing up so that we can get this task underway and we all know what we need. The folks that we know from Fort Myers and those from Naples come through a little humble Bonita Springs. If you enter from the other side, you will understand that this area is really left out. Everything else is developed as far ms to the east (I-75) and to the west (US 41 ). This is why we are in the redevelopment process. One of the problems is that they want to four-lane from Rosemary Drive to West Terry Street. I understand that there are going to be other outlets that can go to Cockleshell, bm it still creates this major problem. They are going to bottleneck into a historic district, and that is further south of East and West Terry Street on Old 41. Another problem that it is going to cause problems whenever you pump pressure into the water line. If you pump it from a 2 inch and put it down into a 1 inch water line, East and West Terry Street - - if you don't four-lane this first, you are going to cause so many problems with all the businesses and people that it is going to be unbelievable. I hope that in your intelligence and in one accord that you think this thing tt,:~*ugh very seriously and about every step of the way before you make a step. Everyone on these boards has probably had a college.education, so let's call this 101 - Traffic Management. Let's think about the people first and then think about everything else. 4, Karyn Everham stated that she knew the focus of this meeting was the development south of Corkscrew and Three Oaks Parkway between Alico and Corkscrew. I have lived in San Carlos for two years and already I feel very comfortable at home. There are wonderful schools, a great county park and an outstanding library. Best of all, they lie within a few miles of each other and the>' are all very close to ~ny home. Putting all these facilities on the same road, the County has not only created a convenience, it has created a close knit community. I wan~ to thank you for this. I understand that it has always been part of the plan. I am not going to claim that there is not a need for a north-south arterial, but my claim is that by making a four or six lane highway down the middle of our residential community is not in the best interests of that community. I believe that one of the most important issues is safety. Community members ride bikes, walk on roadways along the sidewalks. The accessiblity of the facilities on the Parkway have resulted in a very popular sidewalk. Another consideration is that on the east side of the parkway there is a wide ama of grass. However, that low lying grass retains rain water. Will the Parkway be safe from flooding? If 1-75 is congested, mo~o:ists wilI go through Three Oaks Parkway faster to get through the community c~.'en though it is narrow. 5. Ron Talone of David Plummet & Assocates recommended that the MPO remove two secondary roads from the proposed improvements. Neither of these' roads was included in the Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Plan. The two roads that I am speaking of are the extension of Mathison Road south of B~ rata r3eaca Road to Brookside Estates and Pine Haven and continuing south until it joi~s Livingston. We want to point out several adverse impacts, and second, we think it's questionable for the use of the.roads. First, the. extension of Mathison would affect Brookside Estates and Pine Haven and potentially affect the commercial development east of the dog track. Most importantly, this road would impact the wetlands in the ama. There are three other ways that traffic could get between Livingston and Imperial Street and Mathison Avenue. Traffic can use Bonita Beach Road, Dean Street and E. Terry Street. The Collier County Plan includes the east-west component of Livingston which will connect it with old 41. We believe the road is not needed and · 9 would cause adverse impacts to existing development, both residential and commercial, and more importantly to the wetlands in the area. We believe that the marginal benefits of these roads would not justify these adverse impacts and the costs associated with constructing the roads. 6. Michael Simonik, Director of Environmental Policy for the Conservancy of Southwest Florida. stated that they had 5,500 members including many in Lee County. We have 670 volunteers and a 32 member board. He was not sure that the widening idea was a good one for the area. but we are listening and looking for alternatives. We should look at widening 1-75 or putting :.n a local expressway along the interstate. We are very happy at seeing all the c,,'~phasis placed on the environmental issues. We have heard so many times that the Comp Plan is a wonderful plan and we should follow it. This is the CREW area and it takes a lot of time and effort to make the resourceS; of this area happen for the CREW area. Urged the board to thoroughly address all the environmental issues and impacts. 7. Joan Gerber remarked that she lived very close to the stretch of road on old 4 l between Rosemary and Terry Street. I have seen the analyses and it appears to me that poor planning is making her resentful. I saw in the paper that the county is committed to the four Ianing of this road. Why are we having the public hearing? Is this smoke and mirrors, or what? I wonder why our neighborhood is less important than other neighborhoods, and I also'wonder why a plan Ihat is so simple is turning into a complicated plan that is going to degrade my neighborhood. There is bicycles there, there are babies in strollers and mothers trying to get across the street to go to the laundromat, etc. How are they going to cross this four lane road. There are a lot of spanish speaking people here. Unfortunately. it seems to be a lower income area. Four lanes, the traffic and accidents would destroy the character and quality of the neighborhood. This would have a serious public hazard and negative impact on the businesses that she uses. She felt that this would make a tremendous bottleneck and slow traffic just south of Terry Street. Ms. Gerber strongly opposed and deeply resented such a proposed amendment. 8. Arnold Rosenthal of Estero commented that the participation by Estero on the committee or task force was conspicuous by its absence. The growth is in Estero and in five years, we will be as big as Bonita is now. In 10 .',,ears, we w;ll be twice ils big as Bonita is now. He stated that Meg Venceller of the Estero Civic Association and Chamber of Commerce should have been i',ciuoect on the committee. Felt the original plan ,,','as good as it provides an expedkious north-south route that would relieve US 41 and 1-75 of much traffic. That I think '.vas its goal. A camel is a horse designed bya committee. What we have proposed now is a camel. The original design would be successful because it is direct and because it avoids business areas. The revision would pinch traffic into business re'cas and is not direct. It is a convoluded path and it would not accomplish its task nearly as welI as the original plan which is to relieve US 41 and 1-75. People would avoid this and take US 41 or 1-75. I urge the board to drop this revision and go back to the original plan which achieves your goal which I feel you are losing sight of. 9. Meg Vence/ler, Chairman of the Estero Civic Association and Chamber of Commerce. welcomed everyone to Estero. As mentioned, Estero is the fastest growing area in southwest Florida. We have the new university, the Miramar outlet mall, the Florida Everblades and. hopefully, the Naples Philharmonic I0,000 seat amphitheatre. The Estero Civic Association has over 1,000 individual members who are very active in their community and we are very concerned with transportation. We are the group that lobbied hard for the widening of Corkscrew Road. We have not been included in the committee's studies and ask thai they be included in any future studies. Thc MPO has done a lot of good, but Estero hasn't had much of an opportunity to review this. We need tran~.,,ortation that will handle and effectively move thousands of autos, but preserving ofir resources. Could not imagine anyone leaving a concert at I 1:00 p.m. and trying to find an alternate route to 1-75 and then going by this two lane, four lane and six lane going through old 41. I would think that would be a reason to stay on 1-75 or US 41. Ms. Venceller felt that more thought hag to go into this and that they would be happy to sit on the task force. Our concern is also the Sandy Lane Bridge. The environmentalists will be right on you because of the I00 yea~- old fig tree at the beginning of Sandy Lane.. Our concern is the closeness to the Estero High School as River Ranch Road is the back entrance to that. We will also be having a five acre recreational facility it: Estero and Sandy Lane is in close proximity to the railroad tracks would only add to that problem. Our concern is also the cost to the taxpayers. Urged the board to put long thought into this before approval and have more input from the citizens in the area being impacted by this. 10. Elizabeth Oklapek said that after hearing the review of the Master Plan that she had four questions. She lived on Stilv,'ell Parkway and understood the need for growth and that somebody's neighborhood is going to be impacted. Whoever is impacted is not going to like it. a. How far is the easement on each side of a four lane mad do you take and what steps do you take to acquire it? When do we :,tart to acquire the property and will you be acquiring propertyjust off the new road that are economically impacted? For example, a house located 20 yards :;rom your proposed road - in other words, you don't need to spend the monty to take the house. The road is just going to miss it. It is going to take a house that is worth $150,000 down to $75,000, if we are lucky so? ¢&ty to se, ii. I need to know when we are going to find out the answers to all these questions because as it is now, our houses are in limbo. If we want to sell a house on one of these proposed affected roads, we have to tell the prospective buyer. It is important that we know soon. Who can tell me when - today, tomorrow, a month? An>' response? Councilman Richard Bashaw said that we were just taking input now and that she should remain after the meeting and that someone coul~t help her. 11 1 I. Linda Gant asked if anybody on the board ever lived in Bonita Springs. None of thc members had. Have you ever traveled down Mathison, Dean, etc.? This is an excellent idea to widen US 41 and 1-75. The cluster in the center (referring to the map) is so ludicrous. Why would someone want to get off 1-75 to get down to Naples or from Naples to Fort Myers? You are not going to want to go through the bottleneck through old Bonita. I can't believe you are actually considering it. 12. Kathryn Shannon agreed with Linda Gant. The only thing worse than that would be six farting Imperial Street. Those of you who have been here a few years know that the area east of Imperial flooded so badly in 1995. Imagine a six lane road now acting as a dam cutting off all of the area east of Imperial. You simply cannot sacrifice the current existing neighborhoods where people have been living for many, many years to have future growth. It is unconsionable to think about doing this. I feel that 1-75 should be widened and a feeder road placed next to it. Chuck Barmby read comments from Ellen Smith, 18605 Sebring Road, Fort Myers, Florida. Lawrence R. Westin, 20761 A. ndiron Place, Estero, Florida and Nancy Anne Pa?on of the Florida Wildlife Federation into the records of today's meeting. 12 16 1 " FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION Southwest Flaridu 5051 Ca~ello Dflv~ Naples, Florida 103 941/~3-411~ ~EL) 941/6~-5130 ~F~) ~peganet.com TO: Members of the Joim Lee Gounty ,~d Collier Cu~uty Metropolitan Pl~nni~E Organizations FROM; Nancy _,Mine Payton Southwest Flofi~ Field P.~e~emafive DATE: Fax~ to 941/656-7724 on S¢ljt~-.bcr 17, 1998 sLrsj'~c'r: Somh r.,.¢ and North Collier County Transporm/o: Plan Route 952 Extension f~om Immokalcc Road to Corkscrew Thc Fl:rrid~ Wilrtlit~ l~'exlcrafion (F~,"r~tJon) subazits thc following comm~t~ for inclusion in the September 15, 199g, public hearing r~c~rd of thc Lee County ~nd Collier Coun_ry MctropoLiutn pl~ing Or~uizaflons ~oi~t 'l~e I:ederallon does not cudo~s¢ thc cmcnalem of P. out~ 951 ~h ;~ifive ~landq ~l~g ~ ~d~g ofi75 and ~c ~mmt of= ~ m~ :~ I75, before p~g th~ ~ssib~ of e~ Rou~ 951 ~om ~ ~ n~ to ~w. Wc s~on of~c r~n~on of~e Ci~ Ad~s~ ~mmi~ (CAC) reg~i~ m~s ~ of 175. 'Iht CAC ~mm~dcd ~t '~ fc~ib~D' ~d ~m~t of~y su~ Is~ E~ of ~c Ti~po~on PI~ N~ ~od~ by ~on of~Immo~ ~ m ~ ~,~o~ 951-~ --~ionwo~d: · c~ ~ of s~ifive ~ H~ for pubic (C~W); . ~b 109 ~e ~d 115 pl~t ~es ~cl-dlng 25 Bs~ species Pa~¢ 2 ~ · impa~ Priority I and II ~ofida pan~hc~ l~bi~ x~ idcntificd by th~ Florida Inten~gea~y Couacil; · dcg:ra~e S~gic Habitat Conservation A.rea~ as ichabod by the Florkh Cr~me Fr~hwa~t ~ Co~on; * ~e ~, w~. ~ ~ ~ ~y ~c~g ~ l~eh; ~d * s~ ~el~mmt on n~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ by ~ ~I~- '1'~ Felon ~ ~ m~s of~ L~ C~ --~ ~ Co~ ~npnli~ South~v~s~ Florida Field Florkia ';Vildll.f~ F~:r~6oa 20761 Am~'o~ Place F.~t~ro, FL 33928 941-495-0622 16 Se~:~rnbcr. 1998 f~. ~ ~ w~ C~ 1 Agenda Item 2 Al~achment C POST OFFICE aOX :I4SS MPO 10/16/98 FIORTH FORT ~, FL 3391~34SS .~ ~1~ ~ F~(941)6~7~4 ~nfa~ 749-7~4 October 6, 1998 *~aa,~I $~ Commissioner Pamela Mac'Kie Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 RE; Projected Lee-Collier intercounty tra~c in 2020 Dear Commissioner Mae'Kit: At the joint meeting of the Lee County and Naples (Collier County) MPOs on September 18'~ you ~ked for comparative info~ation about projected traffic crossing the Lee-Collier county line for the "~d system" re.retarded by the joint t~k force md the Lee County MPO's TAC md CAC ~nd for the Lee County ~O' s cu~ent 2020 Transpo~tion PI~, which calls for a continuous six-l~e arterial co.coting Livingston Road ~d ~ree Oaks P~kway. In response to your request, 1 have put together the attach~ ~ble summ~zing lhe number of lanes, projected peak season weekday (PSWT) and peak hour traffic volumes, hourly capacities, volume/capacity ratios, and levels of semicc in 2020 for both the cu~t 2020 plans ~d thc recommended amendments networks. I hope this provides the info~ation you w~t~. lfyou would like additional info~ation or further expira- tion of the attached table, plebe call me at (9~1) 656-7720 or S~COM 7~9-7720. Sincerely, LEE COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Glen H. Ahlert MPO Staff Director cc: Ken Heatherington David Loveland Lee County MPO members COLLIER COUNTY FLORID~ 'To: Clerktothe Board: Plea-~pl~ce,he follo,,'ing as a: XXX Normal legal Advcni~mcnl ~ Olhcr: (Display Adv., I~lion, cie.) Pclilion~r: (Name & Address): Mark and Ann Hunlc~, 2121 Oakes Blvd.. Naples. Name & Address of any ~rson(s) to ~ notified by Clerk's O~cc: (If more space is needed, a~lach ~parale shcc0 H~qring~fore BCC X~ BZA Other Requested Hcar/ngdate; ~/~ ~ ~q~ Ba~donadve~i~mcnlap~afing 15 days ~ore ~ng. Ncwspa~r(s) Io ~ u~d: (Complete only ifim~nan0: ~ Naples Daily Nc~s Od~cr ~ ~&qlly Required Pro~ Text: (Include legal dc~ripdon & common I~adon & Size: Pe lion No V-98-14, Mark and An~ Humor r~qucsting 0.90 f~l afler4he-fact variance from d~c reqnired 30 f~l side yard gtback Io 23.10 feet for pro~nv l~aled al 2121 Oakqs BOUl~'ard, timber de~fi~d as Ihe somh V; of Tract 13, Golden Gate Es~a~cs Unil 97, in Secdon 29, Town~hip 49 $onlh, Range 26 Easl. Companion ~thion(s), if any & pro~d hearing D~s Pclilion Fcc include ~dvcmsmg cosl7 ~cs ~ No If Yes. xd~at account should ~ charged for advertising cosls: 113-138323449110 Reviewed by: ' ,,,~ Approved Division Hc~d Dmc Conn[y M~nascr D~c [] County Manager agenda file: tn [] Rcqucsting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Iniliating Division head Io approve and submit original to Clerk's Office. relaining a copy for fie DatcRecci"'cd.L~/'~'::~"( DaleofPublichcaring: /© ~' l:)aleAd,'enis~l~bjo::~ RESOLUTION NO. 98- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-98-14, FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER County, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, ~he Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary fsr %he pro%ection of the public; and WHEREAS, %ne County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance ~o. 9i-i02) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular ~eographic divisions of the County, t-aong which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisabili%y of a 6.90-foot after-~he-fact variance from the required 20 foot sloe yard setsack tc 23.10 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an "E" Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County: and WHEREAS, ail interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petitlsn V-98-14 filed by Mark and Ann Hunter, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: The south % of Tract 13, Golden Gate Estates Unit 97, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 95, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same hereby is approved for a 6.90-foot after-the-fact variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback to 23.10 feet as -1- wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: !. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent cf the actual replacement cos~ of the structure a5 the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall ccnform [c the provisions of The Land Development Code in effect at the time of reccnstruction. BE iT RESOLVED that ~his Resolution relating to Petition Number 'I-98-!.~ he recorded in the minutes of %his Board.. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Assistant County A~torney tilllliillililliliilillllililliiliiliiilliillliliilililililiili iillliiiilillliliillllilllilliilliililllliiliilllilllilliilllll Time sont: ~ September 29, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: V-98-14 2121 Oakes Blvd. Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Purchase No. 113-138323-649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 3998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition No. V-98-14, Mark and ~_nn Hunter requesting a 6.90 foot after-the-fact variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback to 23.10 feet for property located at 2121 Oakes Boulevard, futher described as the south 1/2 of Tract 13, Golden Gate Estates Unit 97, in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. NOTE:All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesman for a group or organization' may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. .! Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the ap?eal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 1.7A September 29, 1998 Mark and Ann Hunter 2121 Oakes Blvd. Naples, FL 34119 Public Hearing to Consider Petition V-98-14 Dear Petitioner: ~c Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County~Commissioners on Tuesday, ~ November 10,1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The ~<~ legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in ~ the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure RESOLUTION NO. 98- 459 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-98-14, FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER County, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 6.90-foot after-the-fact variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback to 23.10 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an "E" Zone for the property h~reinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by, said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Levelopmen% Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZC,ulNG APPEALS of Collier County, Plorida, that: The Petition V-98-14 filed by Mark and Ann Hunte£, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: The south ~ of Tract 13, Golden Gate Estates Unit 97, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 95, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same hereby is approved for a 6.90-foot after-the-fact variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback to 23.10 feet as 17A " shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the "E" Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the provisions of The Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-98-14 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of ~~/ , 1998. ATTESt: .' '~ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. 'BROC'K,~Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AtteSt as to ~~;tO Form and Legal sufficiency: ~arj~rie ~. Student Assistant County Attorney -2- ~ ~'~: ~:~ OAKES ~]OULEVARD (PLAT) ' '~ OAKS BOULEVARD (FIELr;) BIT "A" , ii111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i!11111111111111111 ]~J~o~'2'~io: (8.1.3) 774-86,06 October 1, 1998 MS. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Cambridge Square PUD 98-10 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Purchase No. 113-138323-649110 , NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10,1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNICORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER GGEO1; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "E" ESTATES TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS CAM]BRIDGE SQUARE PUD FOR MEDICAL OFFICES AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY UNITS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF PINE RIDGE ROAD (C.R 896) AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 12.79 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition No. PUD-98-10, Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. representing Jim Colosimo, Trustee of Naples Gateway Land Trust, requesting a rezone from "E" Estates to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be know as Cambridge Square for medical offices and 283 assisted living facility units for property located on the north side of Pine Ridge Road (C.R. 896) and approximately 200 feet east of Livingston Road. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. Ail interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must '~:egister with the County administrator r~ to presentation of the a~Jenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited t~ = ~'.'.nutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak r~ behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COM~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 17 m, m4 October 1, 1998 ~ Robert L. Duane i'~ AICP, Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. ,i:! 715 Tenth Street South Naples, FL 34102 Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-98-10, Cambridge Square Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10,1998 as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in ~' the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. ~"~ You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 1, 1998 Jim Colosimo, Trustee 4099 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 305 Naples, FL 34103 Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-98-10, Cambridge Square Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10,1998 as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure : COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA ~J 7 B'1'~ jj~ ~ REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clcrk to the Board: Please place thc follo,sving as a: ,x~XX Normal legal Advcnisemclu [] Other (Display Ad',,'. Iocmion. tlc I Petition No. t If none. give brief description): PUD-98-10 Petitioner: INamc & Addrcssl: Jim Colosimo. Tntstee, 4099 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 3c5, Naples, FL. 34103 Name & Address of any person(s) In be notified by Clerk's Office: (if more space is needed, attach separate sbccl) Robert L Duane. A[CP, Hole, Monies & Associales, lac, 715 Tcmll Street Sonlh, Naples, FL 34.102 __ Requesled Hearing dale; ] / t~ Based on adverlJsemenl apl:x:aring 15 da,,s before hearing. I ' Ncv, spapcr(s) to be used: (Complete only if imponanlt: X.'CX Naples Daily Ne:'.s Other [] Legally Required Proposed Text: (luclude legal dcscr~plion & common location & Size: Petition No PUD-98-10, Robert L. Duane, AICP, &Hole, Montes and Associales, lac, rcpresenlin~ Jim Colosimo, Trustee &Naples Gam',%~;' Land Trust, requesting a ret. one from 'E~ Estates to "PUD- Planned Unit Development In be knmx-n as Cambridge Square for medical offices and 283 assisted living fadliti~ unites for propcnv located on d~e north side of Pine Ridge Road (q:.R. 896) and npproximatclv 200 feet ~st of Livinlgston Road in Scglion 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 12.79 plus or minus acres. Companion petition(s), if any& proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include adxerlising cost'? [~es ~ No If Yes. ~ hat account should be charged for advertising costs: 113-1383234~91 Reviewed by: Appro',ed b.', DMsion Head Date Count:, Manager Date List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before Bce or BZA: Initiating person to complete one co)' and obtain Division Het:d approval before submitting to Count)' blanager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that an)' necessary lega review~ or request for ~ame is submitted to County Attorney before suhmitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute COllies: [] Couhty blanager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office ~. Other bmarings: Initiating DMsion bead to approve aud submil original Io Clerk's Office. retaining a cop.',' for file. Date Received:. ?kC-1 ~ .. Date of Public hearing; Date Adverlised: , ' ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDiIIANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE ~J..~.. COUNTY L~:~,D DEVELO?ME!~T CODE WHICH fi;CLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR 7HE U] INCORPOraTED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA EY ~.,E,D~ ~ THE OFFICIAL ZO~JING ATLAS MAP NUMBER UGE01; B'f CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF iHE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "E" ESTATES TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS CA24BRiDGE SQUARE PUD FOR MEDICAL OFFICES AND ~.oSIS,_D LIVING FACILITY UNITS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE ~]ORTHEAST CORNER OF /HE i:~TERSECTiON OF PINE RIDGE ROAD (C.R. 896) AND LiViNGSTON ROAD, LOCATED iN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, WHEPEAS, Robert L. Duane, AIC?, of Hole, Montes and Associates, representing Jim Colosimo, Trustee of Naples Gateway Lanc ~.~., ..... petitioned the Board of County Com,~issioners to uhange ~he~n_n~~~ : ~'~-..~os~.~_o.~'~ ~ of the herein described real prc~ertu ..... , ................. .n.N~ by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ....~.=. The 2onlng classification of the herein described real property located in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier Csunty, E!crlda, is change~ from "E" Estates to "PUD" Planned Unit DeTelcpment in accordance with the Cambridge Square PUD Document, attached hereto as Ezhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number GGE01, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Deve!cpmen% Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Crdinance shall become effectlve upon filing with the Department cf State. -1- PASSED A~;D DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this __day of 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency CAMBRIDGE SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Prepared for: Naples Gateway Land Trust Prepared by: 1tole, Montes & Associates, Inc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, FL 34102 Young, VanAssenderp & Vamadoe 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Ste. 300 Naples, Florida 34108 HMA File No. 97.97 July, 1998 EXHIBIT 'iA" TABLE OF CONTENTS Page, SECTION I - Statement of Compliance 1 SECTION II - Property Ownership, Legal Description and Short Title 2 SECTION III - Statement of Intent and Project Description 3 SECTION IV - General Development Regulations 4 SECTION V - Description of Project & Proposed Land Use I0 SECTION VI - General Permitted Uses 13 SECTION VII - Permitted Uses & Dimensional Standards Tract A 14 SECTION VIII - Permitted Uses & Dimensional Standards Tract B 17 SECTION IX - Transportation Requirements 19 SECTION X - Utility and Engineering Requirements 20 SECTION XI - Water Management Requirements 21 SECTION XII - Environmental Requirements 22 EXHIBITS A. PUD Master Plan SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of 12.79 acres of property in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as the CAMBRIDGE SQUARE PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the following reasons: 1.1 The subject property is located in the Golden Gate master plan area and is consistent with the requirements of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use District, Ordinance 98-26. 1.2 Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 1.3 The project will be served by a full range of sen, ices, including sexver and water by the County resulting in an efficient and economical expansion of facilities as required in Policies 3.1H and 3.1L of the Future Land Use Element. 1.4 The project contains a mix of office, adult living facilities, and other transitional uses combined with architectural controls and extensive screening and buffering that are designed to make the project compatible with and complementary to both nearby planned commercial and residential land uses. 1.5 All final local Development Orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Concurrency Management System as implemented by the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. -1- SECTION II PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SHORT TITLE 2.1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The property is owned by Naples Gateway Land Trust at the time of rezoning. 2.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts 12, 13 & 28 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 35 as recorded in P.B. 7, Page 85 2.3 SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "CAMBPdDGE SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT". 2.4 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The project site lies entirely v,4.thin the 1-75 Canal Basin. The site drains to roadside swales on Pine Ridge Road to the south and Livingston Woods Road (8'h Avenue S.W.) to the north. Water management for the project will include a retention/detention system to provide water quality and attenuate the peak discharge rate. Existing site elevations range ] 0.0 to I 1.0. The site is entireIy within Flood X, according to FIRM Ivl~qP 120067 0425D. Flood Zone X designates areas of 500 year flood and areas of 10:) year flood with average depths less than 1 foot. Soil types found on this site include Holopan fine sand (approximately 25%), Malaber fine sand (approximately 65%) and Oldsmar fine sand (appre.._'2..:_::!j i0%). Soil characteristics derived from the soil survey of Collier Co,-'.z,ty, Florida, issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Natural Resources Conservation Service) issued in 1998. -2- SECTION III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 INTRODUCTION " The developer's intent is to establish a Planned Unit Development meeting or exceeding the applicable standards of the Collier County Land Development Code. It is the purpose of this document to set forth guidelines for future development of the project that meet accepted planning principles ,'md practices, anti :o implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is comprised of 12.79 acres, more or less, and is located tin the north side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately three hundred (300) feet to the east of Livingston Road. Cambridge Square may support a number of tracts for development, which are expected to develop with a mixture of office and other Transitional Uses. Access to the subject parcel will be from Pine Ridge road on the designated access point on the PUD Master Plan, Exhibit A. 3.3 LAND USE PLAN The project permits a range of office, adult living facilities and other transitional uses to meet the needs of the developing area. The PUD Master Plan depicts a wetland preserve area, internal circulation, open spaces, landscape buffer areas, and one external access point onto Pine Ridge Road. The PUD Master Plan is designed to be flexible in as much as the size and configuration of tracts will not be finally determioed until site plan approval is requested. 3.4 PROJECT PHASING The applicant has set a preliminary development schedule for the subject property for completion of improvements by January 2002. This projec:;''~ "" ,he project's development can be no more than an estimate based on curre,~: ,narket l, nowledge. -3- SECTION IV GENEP~\L DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development regulations thgt may be applied generally to the development of the Cambridge Square Planned Unit Development and Master Plan. 4.1 GENERAl. The following are general provisions applicable to the PUD Master Plan: A. Regulations for development of Cambridge Square PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, the PUD-Planned Unit Development District, and other applicable sections and pans of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan, in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements. Should these regulations fail to provide specific developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar zoning district in the LDC shall apply. The developer, his successor or assignee shall agree to follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this PUD, as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this agreement. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material prescr,tecl depicting restrictions for the development of Cambridge Square shall becon~e part of the regulations, which govern the manner in which this site may be developed. D. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subj( .:t to a concurrency review under the provisions of Div. 3.15 Adequ'''~ ~'blic Facilities of the LDC at the earliest or next to occur of either fi.-.:;, ,5DP approvnl, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this developme, nL E. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver, provisio~ from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for in this PUD, remain in full force and effect. -4- 4.2 SITE CLEARING AND DRAINAGE Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with the Collier County LDC and the standards and commitments of this document at the time of construction plan approval. 4.3 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES Easements, where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be required by Collier County. All necessao' easements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and utilities. ]'his will be in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at thc time construction plans and plat approvals arc requested. 4.4 PUD MASTER PI.AN A. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, illustratcs the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subseq~,ent approval phase such as at final platting or site development plan application. B. All necessary casements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continucd operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 4.5 PROJECT PLAN APPROVAl. REQUIREMENTS The Site Development Plan for individual tracts shall be s~.bmitted and rcvic~vcd, in accordance with all provisions of Div. 3.3, Site Developr, lcnt Plans of the Collier Count>' Land Development Code unless otherwise provided for within lhis PUD, and prior to the issuance ora building permit or other required development orr:ers. 4.6 PROVISION FOR OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF EARTHEN MA'i'2i-,:, &. The excavation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water management facilities or to other~vise develop water bodies is hereby pemdtted. If, after consideration of fill activities on those buildable portions of th: project site are such that there is a surplus of earthen material, then its off-site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions: A. Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "Development Excavation" pursuant to Sec. 3.5.5.1.3, Land Development Code, whereby off-site -5- removal shall not exceed ten (10) percent of thc totai volume excavated up to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards. B. A timetable to facilitate said removal shall be submitted to the Planning Services Director for approval. Said timetable shall include the length of time it will take to complete said removal, hours of operation and haul routes. C. All provisions of Sec. 3.5. Land Development Code are applicable. 4.7 SUNSET AND MONITORING PROVISIONS The Cambridge Square PUD shall be subject to Sec. 2.7.3.4, of the Collier County Land Development Code. Time Limits for Approved PUD Master Plans and Sec. 2.7.3.6, Monitoring Requirements. 4.8 POLLING PLACES Any community rccrcatior[tpublic building/public room located within the Cambridge Square PUD may be used for a polling place, if determined necessary by thc Supervisor of Elections, in accordance with Sec. 2.6.30 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4.9 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS The project shall preserve native habitat, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.9.5, Vegetation Removal. Protection, and Preservation Standards, of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Common area maintenance, including the maintenance o!' common facilities, open spaces, water management facilities shall be the responsibilily of the Developer, their successor or assign; 4. I I ASSOCIATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR COMMON AR,E.A MAINTENANCE \Vhcnever the developer elects to create land area and/or recreation amenities, whose ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common interest to all of the subsequent purchasers of property within said development, in which the common interest is located, that developer entity shall provide appropriate legal instruments for the'establishment ora Property Ov,'ners Association or another appropriate entity, whose function shall include provisions for the perpetual care and maintenance of ail common facilities and open space subject further to the provisions of the CoIIier County Land Development Code, Section 2.2.20.3.8. 4.12 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A combination of the lakes, wetland and upland preserYes, landscape buffers and open space shall meet the 30% open space requirement for the development as set forth in Section 2.6.32.3 of the LDC. Open space shall include all pervious green space within development parcels and lots and shall also include all land that may be dedicated for public purposes. 4.13 SIGNAGE Monumental entry signagc may be developed at the siugular project entrance in addition to the provisions of Division 2.5 of the Land Development Code. Project and directory signage shall be limited to ground signs and signage shall be architecturally compatible with the PUD architectural design theme. 4.14 SITE LIGHTING Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which ,,,,'ill protect roadways and neighborhood residential properties from direct glare or other interference. The maximum height of parking lot light fixtures shall be ]6 feet. 4.15 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Such resources shall be subject to the requirements of Section 2.2.25 o: the Collier County Land Development Code. 4.16 LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING The development of the PUD Master Plan shall be subject to the governed by the following conditions: -7. A. Pine Ridge Road Landscape Buffer 1. Width: A minimum of 15 feet. 2. Shade Trees: 25 foot on center, minimum; 14 in height at installation. 3. Palm or Pine 'Frees: In addition to the required shade trees, I per 15 feet; ma>' be clustered with 30 foot maximum distance between trees or cluster of trees; trees to have an average height of 18 feet and a minimum of 8 feet. 4. Hedge: A hedge of at least 24 inches in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet in height within one year where vehicular areas are adjacent to road right-of-way, pursuant to Collier County LDC section 2.4.4.3. The required hedge shall be designed to be curvilinear. B. East Landscaped Buffer None. The site's existing wetland preserve shall provide the. project's required buffer. C. \Vest Landscape Buffer 1. Width: A minimum of 30 feet v.'ithout water management; and, shall incorporate a berm with a minimum height of 3 feet. The required hedge shall be designed to be curvilinear over the berm. 2. Shade Trees: 20 foot on center, minimum, 14 foot in height at installation. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, 1 per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 f~c,' ~'Srnum distance between trees or cluster ,5£ trees; trees to have an average height of 18 feet and a minim:un of 8 feet. 4. Hedge: A continuous hedge comprised of a minimum often gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a minimum four feet on center at planting. Installation shall be interwoven with a continuous 6 foot green or black covered vinyl chain link fence. -8- D. North (Rear) Landscape Buffer 1. Width: 75 feet; a minimum cf 30 feet without waler management; and, shall incorpor,ate a berm with a minimum height of 3 feet. The required hedge shall be designed to be curvilinear over the berm. 2. ShadcTrces: 20 foot on center, minimum; 14 foot in height at installation. Required shade trees shall be Maple Trees. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, I per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 foot maximum distance between trees or cluster of trees; trees to have an average height of 18 feet and a minimum of 8 feet. 4. Hedge: A continuous hedge comprised ora minimum often gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a minimum four feet on center at planting. Installation shall be interwoven with a continuous 6 foot green or black covered vinyl chain link fence. E. Internal Buffer Between Uses 1. Width: 10 feet; water management prohibited 2. Shade Trees: 20 foot on center, minimum 12 foot in height at installation. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, 1 per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 feet maximum distance betxveen trees or cluster of trees; tretq to have an average height of 18 feet and ~ -!-!r ,~r.~ of 8 feet. 4. None required if developed under unified control. -9- SECTION V DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND PROPOSED LAND USES 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forlh the General Permitted uses and development standards for Tracts "A" and "B". 5.2 DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY The maximum development intensity permitted on Tract "A" is thirty-five thousand (35,000) S.F. of gross leasable office space within the Eastern parcel, not to exceed five (5) acres. Transitional uses on Tract "A" are permitted to be developed up to a floor area ratio of .45. On Tract "B", the maximum development intensity is also based on a floor area ratio of.45. 5.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES The project Master Plan. including and use of land for the acreage noted, is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. TABLE I: CAMBRIDGE SQUARE SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY _ TYPE ACREAGE INTENSITY TPACT A Office/Transitional Uses 5.0 Maximum 35,000 . TRACT B Transitional Uses 7.79± .45 F.A.R *Permitted Uses are defined in Section VI, VII, and VIII. This acreage includes open space or recreational areas that may he Inca*ed within tract acreage. Table I is a schedule of the intended land uses, with approximate acreage of the total project indicated. The arrangement of these land areas is shown on thc Master Plan (Exhibit "A"). The Master Development Plan is an illustrative preliminary, development plan. Design criteria and layout that is illustrated on the Master Development Plan and other exhibits supporting this project shall be understood to be flexible so that final -10- 1 7 B~mmm~ design may satisfy development objectives and be consist.ent with the Project Development, as set forth in this document. SECTION VI GENERAL PERMITTED USES 6.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the general permitted uses f~r both Tracts A and B depicted on the PUD Master Plan. Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Cambridge Square PUD. General permitted uses are those uses which general ser-,: the Developer and end users of Cambridge Square PUD and typically are part of the common infrastructure of the proposed development. 6.2 General Permitted Uses: I. Essential sen'ices as set forth under Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other a:'chitectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 5. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and re]ated uses. 6. Preserve areas or landscape features including bu: not limited to landscape buffers, berms, and fences. 7. Fill storage subject to the standards set forth in the Collier Co~ .nty Land Development Code. 8. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls. 9. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. 1 SECTION VII PERMIT'FED USES & DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS TRACT A 7.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the area designated on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, as "Commercial-Tract A". A maximum of 35,000 square feet of leasable commercial area shall be developed within Tract A. 7.2 No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. The commercial uses are as foIlows: a. Group Care Facilities (category I & II); care units, subject to the provisions of ColIier County LDC section 2.2.3.3.6; nursing homes; assisted living faciIities pursuant to 400.402 F.S. and Ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to 65I F.S. and Ch. 4.183 F.A.C.; all subject to CoIlier County LDC section 2.6.26. b. Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services (8721). c. Business sen, ices (groups 7311, 7313, 732.2-7331, 7338, 7361, 7371,7372, 7374-7376, 7379). d. Childcare centers and adult day care centers (8351). e. Churches and other places of worship (866D f. Depository institutions without drive-thru (groups 6011-6099). g. Engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 8711- 8713). h. Health services (groups 8011-8049). i. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411). -14- ,, 1 j. Legal services (8111). k. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748) I. Medical Office (groups 8011 - 8049 In. Miscellaneous personal services (7291). n. Non-depository credit institutions (groups 6141 - 6163). o. Real estate (groups 6531-6541 ) p. Schools, public and private (8211). q. Any other usc which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associatud with the above permitted principal uscs and structures, including vehicular garages or covered parking. 2. Essential services and facilities. 3. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the tbregoing uses and which Development Services Director determines Io be compatible. 7.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TRACT A A. Site Area: Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet B. Site Width: One hundred (100) feet C. Setbacks from PUD Boundaries: 1. Front Yard: Single Story Structure: Tweuty-five (25) Feet Two Story Structure: Thirty-five (35) Feet Three Story Structure: Forty-five (45) Feet 2. Side Yard: Twenty-five (25)Feet. 3. Rear Yard: Seventy-five (75) Feet D. Maximum Height of Structures: Thirty-Five (35) Feet. E. Maximum Number of Stories: Three (3) habitable floors. F. Distance Between Principal Structures: None, or a minimum often (10) feet with unobstructed passage from front to rear. G. Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures: One thousand (1,000) square feet per building on the ground floor. H. Architectural Common Theme: Structures within this Tract shall have a common architecturaI theme, inclusive of common or compatible use of materials and colors. Structures must include the following common elements. 1. Primary Exterior Walls: Stucco 2. Porches or exterior covered areas: Stucco or \Vood Frame 3. Prima.D' Roofs and Covered Parking: Clay or Cement, Tile; 5/I2 roof pitch or greater. 4. Parking and site lighting: Anodized Bronze Fixtures SECTION Vlll PERMITTED USES & DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS TRACT B 8.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the area designated on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, as "Tract B-Transitional Uses". A maximum 0.45 floor area ratio of square footage shall be developed within Tract B. 8.2 No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Group Care Facilities (category, I & II); care units, subject to the provisions of Collier County, LDC section 2.2.3.3.6; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to 400.402 F.S. and Ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to 651 F.S. and Ch. 4.183 F.A.C.; all subject to Collier County LDC Section 2.6.26. 2. Child care centers and adult day care centers (8351). 3. Churches and other places of worship (8661). 4. Schools, public and private (8211). B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the above permitted principal uses and structures. 2. Essential services and facilities. 3. Customary accessory uses and structures, including vehicular garages or covered parking. 4. Recreational uses and facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, etc. Such uses shall be visually and functionally compatible with the adjacent primary structures, which have use of such facilities. 5.Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. ' " 1 8.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TRACT B A. Minimum Site Area: 2.25 Acres B. Minimum Site Width: 150 feet C. Setbacks for PUD Boundaries: 75 Feet D. Setbacks Internal to the PUD: 25 Feet; none if ur, der unified control. E. Maximum Hei~,ht of Structures: Thirty-five (35) Feet. F. Maximum Number of Stories: Three (3) habitable floors. G. Distance Between Principal Structures: None, or a minimum often (I 0) feet with unobstructed passage from front to rear. H. Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures: One thousand (1,000) square feet per building on the ground floor. I. ArchitecturaI Common Theme: Structures within this Tract shall have a common architectural theme, inclusive of common or compatible use of materials and colors. Structures must include the following common elements. 1. Primary Exterior Walls: Stucco 2. Porches or exterior covered areas: Stucco or Wood Frame 3. Primary Roofs and Covered Parking: Clay or Cement Tile; 5/12 roof pitch or greater. 4. Parking and site lighting: Anodized Bronze Fixtures SECTION IX TRANSPORTATION REQIjIREMENTS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the transportation commitmehts of the Project Developer. 9.1 The developer shall provide arterial level street lighting at the PUD's singular access point on Pine Ridge Road. Said improvement shall be in place prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. 9.2 The Developer shall provide a right turn lane at file project's proposed access from Pine Ridge Road. The Developer shall bear the cost of these improvements and such improvements are not subject to impact fee credits. 9.3 The County may require an additional 10 feet of right-of-way for the widening of Pine Ridge Road. The County may acquire the prope~y in the form of a roadway easement for impact fee credits if acquired prior to the development of the subject property. 9.4 Pedestrian access shall be provided between all parcels and uses in the development, at the time of t:inal Site Development Plan approval for each individual tract. -19- SECTION X UTILITY AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the utilities and engineering cor~mitments of the Project Developer. 10.1 UTILITIES A. Potable water will be supplied by the County Water service system through an existing 12 inch main running east and west on the north side of Pine Ridge Road. Ail construction plans and technical specifications for the proposed project shall be reviewed and approved by the Plarming Department, Engineering Review Services prior to commencement of construction. On site water mains shall be installed by the developer at no cost to the County and shall be Master Metered. Ali on site water mains shall be owned and maintained by the developer, his assigns or heirs. B. Connection to the County sewer system shall be tn ~he County force main located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, at no cost to the County. Sewage shall be pumped by an on-site station to the County system. All construction plans and technical specifications shall be approved by the Planning Department, Engineering Review Ser¥ice, prior to construction. 10.2 ENGINEERING A. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to the Planning Services Director for review. No constructitm permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction, in accordance with'the submitted plans, is granted by the Planning Services Director. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of the Collier County l.a~'~ r~-.:~ ?,aent Code, including those set forth in Division Three (3). C. The developer, and all successors in interest to the developer, are hereby placed on notice that they shall be required to satisfy the requirements of all County development ordinances or codes in effect prior to or concurrent with any subsequent development order relating to this site, including Site Development Plans and any other application that will result in the issuance of a final or local development order. SECTION XI WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the water management commitments of the Project Developer. I 1.1 Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Director for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction, in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Planning Services Director. 11.2 Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance xvith the appropriate provisions of the CoIIier County Land Development Code. 11.3 Landscaping, within the water management areas, is permitled, except as prohibited by the Collier County Land Development Code. 11.4 An excavation permit shall be required where applicable in accordance with Div. 3.5 of the Land Development Code and South Florida Water Management District Rules. I 1.5 ]'he subject property is currently under common ownership with the adjacent property to the east at the time of this zoning application. Under this circumstance, a water management system may be shared with property to the east and the cypress area within this system as generally depicted on the PUD Master Plan, shall be preserved and enhanced. If the ownership changes on the property to the east, water management may be shared with the necessary easements in pIace. 11.6 Water management requirements of the PUD's individual developments shall be linked through the proposed drainage easement, as shown on Exhibit "A" PUD Master Plan, which outfalls to the site's eastern wet]and preserve area. -21 - SECTION XII ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS The purpose of this section is to set forth the environmental requirements of thc project developer. 12.1 Thc project shall meet all pcrlincnt environmental related requirement:; of thc Collier County Growth Management Plan, including the Coastal Zone and Conservation Management Element, in effect at the time that requests are made for Site Development Plan approval. 12.2 A wetland preserve area is depicted on the PUD Master Plan. This wetland is under common ownership with the adjacent property to the east. The project's plan for development is to presep,'e this wetland area in its entirety and to enhance it whh shared water management between the two properties. 12.3 Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the state of Florida Environmental Resource Permit rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Review Staff. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be counted towards mitigation for impacts to Collier Count>' jurisdictional v,'etlands. 12.4 Ail conservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat or site plan, which ever is applicable, with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. In the event, tl~e project does not require platting, all cc, p,;ervation areas shall be recorded as conservalion/preservation tracts or easements dzdicated to an approved entity or to Collier County, xvith no responsibility' for mainlenance and subject to the uses and limitations similar to or ns per Florida Statutes Section 704.06. 12.5 An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (e,:r,:~ e-,.-4 plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservation are:,.,, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 12.6 Proof of ownership for the shared water management for the adjoining property to the east shall be provided to Current Planning Review Staff prior to Final Site Plan Approval If the ownership changes for lands to the east of the subject property water management may be shared with the required easements. -22- 12.7 Petitioner shall retain the existing wetland preserve consisting .of 2.59 acres, more or less, per the requirement of Ordinance 98-26. 12.8 Buffers shall be provided around wetlands, extending a least lifteen (15) feet landward from the edge of wetland preserves in hll places and averaging twe, nty-five (25) feet from the landward edge of the wetlands to remain on site. Where natural buffers are not possible, structural buffers shalI be provided in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit RuIes. 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLlC FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS;' i! Timoth b. ~', Naples Collier Collier Ccunty November 10, 1998 ~ ,OS~Tm,~ ~ ~ £[EC-nVE ~ ^PPO~.~rivE. WHO MUll' FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by an)' person serving at the county, city. or other local le..et of gave. ,meat on an appointed or elected boa.~d. council, commission, authority, or committee_ It applies equally to members at' advisory and non-advisory bodies who art presented with a voting conHic: of imerest under Scc~iun 112.3145, Florida Statu~es. Thc requirements of Ih[s law arc mancla~ory; although the use of this par:icular Form is noi required by law. you arc encou~ged ~o use it in making the disclosure recruited by law. Your responsibililies under the law when Faced with a measure in which )'au have a conflict of interest will vary grrady depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive poskion. For this reason, pic:z.~ pay dose attention to the instructions on this Form befor~ completing :he rr,-erse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION '1'12.~'143, FLORIDA ETATUTE$ ELECTED OFFICERS: . A person holdin~ elec:i'.e county, municipal, or other local public office .",lUST ABSTAIN f~om voting on a me~sure which inures to his special private .~ain. Each local offic=r also is prnhibhed from knowingly voting on a measure which inures ~o the special gain of a principal (oH~er than a governrntm ageno') by whom he is retained. In ehher case., you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating ~o ~he a~sembly lhe nature of your inter~t in Ihe me.ute on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN I$ DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by comp c ing and filing this for.'n v. ilh the person responsible For recording the minutes of the meeHng, who should incorporate Ihe form in Ibc minu~es. Al>POINTED OFFICERS: ~' A person holding: appointive county, municipal, or other local public of Bce ,'",lUST ABSTAIN from voting on a mca.sum which inures to his special privase gain. Each local offic~ also is prohibited From knowingly vc~u,s ,...~ .,.casure which inure.s to the special gain of a princip:d (other than a government agency) by whom he is rtsaine~. ' A pcs'son holdi~g an appoimive local office other,vise may participate in a mailer in which he h~ a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature o1' the conl'licx before making an:,' attempt to influence [he decision by ora or writlen communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction· ' IF YOU INTEND TO ~,IAKE ANY ATTE~II:rI'' TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE NIEETING ~T WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: · You should complete and file [his' form {before m~,ki'n!~ any altempt to in}luence ~h~ decision] with the person responsible recording the minutm or Ihe meeting., who will incorporate the form in the minutes. .... · A cop,/of the t'orm should be provided immediately to the other re.embers o1' the agent. . , · The Form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of ~he ma~t~ i~ which you have a con.ct of'mtn:. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DEC~S1ON EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: · You should disclose, orally the nature of your conflict in th,: measure before participating. · You should complete the form and file it within I$ days after the vote occurs with the per,on responsible for recording the minute~ of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. " DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFIC~t~'~ INT~ST I. ?(mothy b. Hanccc,~ _. hereby al(sclc, se that on ,November 10, ~ (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) H inurc~ to my special private gain: or ,, inured to Ihe special gain of · by whom I am retained. lb) The measure before my agency and ~he nature of my ~nterest in Ihe measure is as fo/lows: Boacd of County Co,nm[ssioners Item 17.B. Petition PUD-98-10, Mr. Robert Duane, AICP, of Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. representing Jim ColDs(mo, Trustee, Requestino a rezone from 'E" Estates to "PUD" Planne~ Unit Development to be known as Cambridge Square PUD for property located on the north side of Pine Ridge (C.R. 896), approximately 300 feet east of Livingston Roa~ in Section 7, Township 49 South, Rance 26 E ..... Collier County, After consultation with the County Agtorney, I abstained from voting on the above matter - pursuant to Section 286.012, Florida Statutes, wh/ch provides _ no member of any state, county, or municipal goverrm~enta[ board, cc~m~issicn or agency who is present at any meeting of such body at which an official decision, ruling or other official act i~ to be taken .- or adopted may abstain fr~n voting...except when, with respect ~2o any such rm~nber, there is, or appears to be, a possible conflict of interest under the provisions of S.112.311, S.112.313, or S.i12.3143. In snch cases, said member shall cc~plv with the disclosure requir~nents of S.112.3143." Date Filed ignature/ ' ' ' NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY R~ DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY lie PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORF: OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $$.000. " ...... :..~ ..... :, !:?'. .. J. 7B ORDINANCE NO. 98- 89 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTy LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES TBE COM?REHENSlVE ZOI~ZNG REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER GGE01; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIn4 DESCRIBED REAL PNOPERTY FROM "E" ESTATES TO "PUD" PLANI~ED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS CAMBRIDGE SQUARE PUD FOR MEDICAL OFFICES AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY UNITS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE ~ORTHEAST CORNER OF THE iNTERSECTIOH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD {C.R. 896) AND LIVINGSTON ROAD, LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 12.79 ACRES; AND Bi' PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole, Montes and Associates, representing Jim Colosimo, Trustee of Naples Gateway Land Trust, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein dencribed real property located in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "E" Estates t¢ "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with thz Cambridge Square PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number GGE01, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners ; of Collier County, Florida, this 1998. ' ~. ~ ,~tI& BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 'l ~.....~' ot COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA , ~ ~ s ~pp~oved a~ ~o ~o~m and L~ga~ CAMBRIDGE SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Prepared for: Naples Gate:ray Land Trust Prepared by: Hole, Monies & Associates. Inc. 715 Tenth Street South Naples, FL 34102 Young, VanAsscndcrp & Varnadoc 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Sic. 300 Naples. Florida 34108 lIMA File No. 97.97 July, I998 Revised October, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I - Statement of Compliance 1 SECTION II - Property Ownership, Legal Description and Shorl Title 2 SECTION III - Statement of Intent and Project Description 3 SECTION IV - General Development Regulations 4 SECTION V - Description of Project & Proposed l,and Use I0 SECTION VI -General Permitted Uses 12 SECTION VII - Permitted Uses & Dimensional Standards Tract A 13 SECTION VIII - Permitted Uses & Dimensional Standards Tract B 16 SECTION IX - Transpoaation Requirements 18 SECTION X - Utility and Engineering Requirements 19 SECTION XI - Water Management Requirements 20 SECTION XII - Environmental Requirements 2 I EXHIBITS A. PUD Master Plan SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of 12.79 acres of property in Section 7. Township 49 South, Range 26 East, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as the CAMBRIDGE SQUARE PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of the Collier Ccanty Grov, th Management Plan for the £ollowing reasons: I. I The subject property is located in the Golden Gate Master Plan area and is consistent with the requirements of the Pine Ridge Road Mixed Use District, which permit limited office and other conditional uses, Ordinance 98-26 for the proposed area and development standards contained in this PUD. ':' 1.2 Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development . regulations as set forth in bjecUve 3 ofthe Future [.and Use Element. 1.3 The project will be served by a full range,of services, including sewer and water by the . i County resulting in an efficient and economical expansion of facililies as required in Policies 3. IH and 3.1L of the Future Land Use Element. 1.4 The project contains a mix of office, adult living facilities, and other transitional uses : ': combined with architectural controls and extensive screening and buffering that are designed to make the project compatible with and complementary to both nearby planned commercial and residential land uses. 1.5 All final local Development Orders for this project are subject to the Collier County Concurrency Management System as implemented by the At, equate Public Facilities .~ Ordinance· : SECTION I1 PROPF. RTY O\\"NERSHIP. LEGAl. DESCRII'TION AND SItORT TITLE 2.1 PROPERTY OWNERSItlP The properly is owned by Naples Gateway Land Trust at the time of rezoning. 2.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts 12. 13 8:28 nfGotden Gate Estates Unit 3.':, us recorded in P.B. 7. Page 85 2.3 SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and oiled as the "CAMBRIDGE SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT". 2.4 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The project site lies entirely within tile 1-75 Canal 13asin. Thc site drains to roadside sv,,'ales on fine Ridge Road to thc south and Livingston \Vood.g Road (8"' Avenue S.W.) to the north. Water management for the project ',','ill include a retention/detention system to provide water quality and attenuate tile peak d schargc rate. Existing s c elevations range I0.0 to I 1.0. ]'he site is entirely within Flood X. according to I:IRM MAP 120067 0425D. Flood ,Zone X designates areas of $00 .'.'ear flood and areas of 100 ,ear flood with average depths less than 1 foot. ' Soil types found on this site include llolopan fine sand (approximately 25~, :,), Malabcr fine sand (approximately 65%) and Oldsmar fine sand (approximately 10%). Soil characteristics derived from the soil survey of Collier Counw ~'loncta. ~ssucd by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Natural Resources Conservation Service) issued in 1998. -2- SECTION III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 INTRODUCTION The developer's inlent is to establish a Planned Unh Development meeting or exceeding the applicable standards o£ the Collier Count',' I.and Deveiopmcnt Code. It is the purpose of this document to set forth guidelines for fature development of the project that meet accepted planning principles and practices, and ~,, implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is comprised of 12.79 acres, more or less. and is located on the north side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately three hundred (300) feet to the east of Livingston Road. Cambridge Square may support a number of tracts lbr development, which are expected to develop with a mixture of office and other Transitional Uses. Access to thc subject parcel will be from Pine Ridge Road on the designated access point on the PUD Master Plan. Exhibit A. 3.3 LAND USE PI.AN Thc project permits a range of office, adoh living facilhics and other transitional uses to meet thc needs of the developing area. The PUD Master Plan depicts a wetland preserve area. internal circulation, open spaces, landscape buff'er areas, and one external access point onto Pine Ridge Road. The PUD Master Plan is designed to be flexible inasmuch as the size and configuration of tracts will not be finally determined until site plan approval is requested. 3.4 PROJECT PHASING The applicant has set a preliminary development schedule for tile subject 1: 'opcrty for completion of improvements by January 2002. This pro ection of :Jle project's development can be no more than an estimate based on current nr~:ket l<nm, vledge. SECTION IV GENERAL DF~VI';I.OPMENT REGULATIONS The purpose of this Section is to set forlh the development regulations that may be applied generally to the development of the Cambridge Square Planned Unit Development and Master Plan. 4.1 GENERAL The following are general provisions applicablc to the PUD Ma':::r Plan: A. Regulations for development of Cambridgc Square PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, the PUD-Planned Unit Development District, and other applicable sections and pans of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growlh Management Plan, in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, to v~hicb said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements. Should these regulations fail to provide specific developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar zoning district in the LDC shall apply. The developer, his successor or assignee shall follow the PUD Master Plan and thc regulations of this PUD, as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications ms may be agreed to in the rczoning of the property. In addition, any successor in tit e or assignee is subject to the commitments within this agreement· B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be tile same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic matcriaI presented depicting restrictions for tile development of Cambridge Square shall become p::rt of the regulations, which govern the manner in which this site may be devek,ped. D. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Div. 3.I5 Adequate Public Facilities of the LDC at the earliest or next to occur of either final St'.}: ,~p,~.,}~,[, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. F.. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver, provisions from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for in this PUD, remain in full force and effect· 4.2 SITE CLEARING AND DRAINAGE Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with the Collier Count.,,' LDC and the standards and commitments of this document in effect at the time ofconstruction plan approval. 4.3 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES Easements. where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be required by Collier County. All necessary easements, dedications or other instruments shall be granted to ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and utilities. This will be in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time construction plans and plat approvals are requested. 4.4 PUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit '*A". PUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and ma,',' be varied at an),' subsequent approval phase such as at linal platting or site development plan application. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in thc project. 4.5 PROJECT PLAN APPP, OVAL REOUIREMENTS 'File Site Development Plan for individual tracts shall be submitted and reviewed, in accordance with all provisions of Div. 3.3, Site Developme~:t Plans of the Collier County Land Development Code unless otherwise provided :or within this PUD, and prior to the issuance ora building permit or other required develt, pment orders. 4.6 PROVISION FOR OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF EARTflEN MATERIAL The excavation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water management lhcilitics or to othcrxvise dcvclop water bodies is hereby permit*cd. If, after consideration of fill activities on those buildable portions of thc project site are such that there is a surplus of earthen material, then its off-site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to tile following conditions: A. Excavation activities shall comply with tile definition of a "Development Excavation" pursuant to Sec. 3.5.5.1.3. Land Development Code, whereby off-site -5- removal shall not exceed ten (I0) percent of the total volume excavated up to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards. B. A timetable to facilitate said removal shall be submitted to the Planning Services Director for approval. Said timetable shall include the length of time it will take to complete said removal, hours of operation and haul routes. C. All provisions of Sec. 3.5, Land Development Code are applicable. 4.7 SUNSET AND MONITORING PROVISIONS Thc Cambridge Square PUD shall be subject to Sec. 2.7.3.4, otthe Collier County Land Development Code, Time Limits for Approved PUD Master Plans, and Sec. 2.7.3.6, Monitoring Requirements. 4.8 POLLING PLACES Any community recreation/public building/public room located within thc Cambridge Square PUD may be used for a polling place, if determined necessary by the Supervisor of Elections, in accordance with Sec. 2.6.30 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4.9 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REOUIREMENTS The project shall preserve native habitat, in accordance with the provisions of Section ~.9.5, Vegetation Removal, Protection, and Preservation Standards, of the Colllcr County [.and Development Code. 4.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Common area maintenance, including the maintenance of cch~nmon facilities, open spaces, water management facilities shall be the responsibility of the Developer, their successors or assigns. 4.11 ASSOCIATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Whenever the developer elects to create land area and/or recreation anqenities, whose ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common inlerest to all of the subsequent. purchasers of properly within said development, in which the common interest is located, that developer entity shall prnvide appropriate legal instruments for the establishment of a Properly Owners' Association or another appropriate entity, whose function shall include provlsmns for the perpetual care and maintenance of all common facilities and open space subject furlhcr lo thc provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.2.20.3.8. 4.12 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A combination of the lakes, wetland and upland preserves, landscape buffers and open space shall meet the 30% open space requirement for thc development as set forth in Section 2.6.32.3 of the LDC. ()pen space shall include all pervious green space within development parcels and lots and shall also include all land that may be dedicated for public purposes. 4.13 SIGNAGE Monumental entry signagc may be developed at the singular project entrance in addition to the provisions of Division 2.5 of the l.and Dcvclopn~cnt (/ode. Project and directory signage shall be limited to ground signs and signagc shall be architecturally compatible with the PUl) architectural design theme. 4.14 SITE LIGIITING Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and neighborhood residential properties from direct glare or other interference. The maximum height of parking lot light fixtures shall be 16 feet. 4. I5 ARCIIAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Such resources shall be subject to the requirements of Secti,',n~'.~.2:" ~ ;-.,' :ne Collier County Land Development Code. 4.16 LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING ~ Thc development of the PUD Master Plan shall be subject to the governed by the £ollowJng conditions: A. Pine Ridge Road Landscape Buffer 1. Width: A minimum of 15 fect. 2. Shade Trees: 25 foot on center, minimum: 14 feet in height at instaIlatinn. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, 1 per 15 feet; may be clustered with 30 foot maximum distance bctxvecn trees or cluster of trees; trees to i~a,,'e an average height of 18 feet and a minimum of ',s feet. 4. I tedge: A hedge of at least 24 inches in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet in height within one 3'car where vehicular areas are adjacent to road right-of-way, pursuant to Collier County LDC Sectiun 2.4.4.3. The required hedge shall be designed to be curvilinear. B. East Landscaped Buffer None. ]'he site*s existing wetland preserve shall provide the pro.jcct's required buffer. C. West Landscape Buffer 1. Width: A minimum of 30 feet without water management: and, shall incorporate a berm with a minimum height of 3 feet. The required hedge shall be designed to be curvilinear over the berm. 2. ShadeTrecs: 20 foot on center, minirrum. 14 foot in height at installation. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, 1 per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 foot maxim.tm distance between trees or cluster of trees: tre~s to have an average height of 18 feet ac.: a minimum of 8 feet. 4. }ledge: A continuous hedge comprised of a minimum often gallon plants five feet in height, three l~et in spread and spaced a minimum ibur feet on center at planting. Installation shall be interwoven with a continuous 6 foot green or black covered vinyl chain link fence. I). Noah (Rear) Landscape Buffer I. Width: 75 Feet; a minimum of 30 feet without water management; and, shall incorporate a berm with a minimum height of 3 feet. The required hedge shall be designed to be curvilinear over the berm. 2. Shade Trees: 20 foot on center, minimum; 14 foot in height at installation. Required shade trees ,':hall be Maple Trees. 3. Palm or Pine 'Frees: In addition to the required shade trees, I per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 foot maximum distance between trees or cluster of trees; trees to have an average height of 18 feet and a minimum of 8 feet. 4. l ledge: A continuous hedge comprised ora minimum often gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a minimum four feet on center at planting. Installation shall be interwnven with a continuous 6 foot green or black covered vinyl chain link fence. E. Internal Buffer Between Uses 1. Width: 10 feet; water management prohibited 2. Shade Trees: 20 foot on center, minimum 12 foot in height at installation. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, I per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 feet maxim)~m distance between trees or cluster of trees; trees to have an average height of 18 feet and e r-;,~;,-,,,m of 8 feet. 4. No buffer required if developed under unified control. D. Noah (P, ear) Landscape Buffer 1. Width: 75 feet; a minimum of 30 feet without water management; and, shall incorporate a berm with a minimum height of 3 feet. The required hedge shall be designed to bc curvilinear over the berm. 2. Shade Trees: 20 foot on center, minimum; 14 foot in height at installation. Required shade trees shall be Maple Trees. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, I per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 foot maximum distance between trees or cluster of trees; trees to have an average height of 18 feet and a minimum of 8 feet. 4. l ledge: A continuous hedge comprised ora minimum often gallon plants five Feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a minimum four feet on center at planting. Installation shall be interwoven with a continuous 6 Foot greed or black covered vinyl chain link fence. E. Internal Buffer Between Uses I. Width: 10 feet; water management prohibited 2. Shade Trees: 20 foot on center, minimum 12 foot in height at installation. 3. Palm or Pine Trees: In addition to the required shade trees, I per 10 feet; may be clustered with 30 feet maximum distance between trees or cluster of trees; trees to have an average height of 18 feet and a minim~m~ of 8 feet. 4. No buffer required if developed under unified co,arol. 178 SECTION V I)ESCRIP'FION OF PROJEC'F AND PROI~OSED I,AND USES 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the General Permitted Uses and development standards for rFracts "A" and "B". 5.2 DEVELOPMENT IN'I'ENSITY The maximum development intensity permitted on Tract "A" is thirty-five thousand (35,000) S.F. of gross leasable office space within the Eastern parcel, not to exceed five (5) acres. Transitional uses on Tract "A" are permitted to be developed up tn a floor area ratio of .45. On Tract "B', the maximum development intensity is also based on a floor area ratio of.45. 5.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES The project Master Plan. including and usc of land for the acreage noted, is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A". PUD Master Plan. TABLE l: CAMBRIDGE SQUARE SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY TYPE ACP, EAGE INTENSITY TRACT A Office/Transitional Uses 5.1') Maximum 35,000 TILACT B Transitional Uses 7.79± .45 F.A.R *Permitted Uses are defined in Section VI, VII, and VIII. This acreage includes open space or recreational areas that ma5,' be located within tract acreage. ]'able I is a schedule of the intended land uses. with approximate acreage, of the total project indicated. The arrangement of these land areas is shown on the Master Plan (Exhibit "A'). The Master Development Plan is an illustrative preliminary development plan. Design criteria and layout that is illustrated on the Master Development Plan and other exhibits supporting ibis project shall be understood to be flexible so that final -10- design may satisfy development objectives and be consistent with the Project Development. as set forth in this document. SECTION VI GENERAl, PERMITTED USES 6.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the general permitted uses for both Tracts A and B depicted on the PUl) Master Plan. Certain uses shall bc considered general permitted uses throughout the Cmnbridge Square PUD. General permitted uses arc those uses which general serv: thc Developer and end- users of Cambridge Square PUD and typically are part of the common infr~tructure of the proposed development. 6.2 General Permhted Uses: 1. Essential scr,,'ices as set forth under Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other ar::hitcctural or structural bank treatments. 4. Guardhouses. gatchouses, and access control stmcturas. 5. Temporao' construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 6. Preserve areas or landscape features including but :~ot limited to landscape buffers, berms, and fences. 7. Fill storage subject to the standards set forth in the Collier Cour ty Land I)evclopmcnt Code. 8. Landscape buffers, bcrms, fences and wails. 9. An3' other use v,'hich is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. SECTION VlI PERMI'FFED USES & DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS TRACT A 7.1 PURPOSE ]'he purpose o1' this Section is to set forth the regulations Ibr tile area designated on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, as "CommerciaI-Tract A". A maximum of 35,000 square feet of leasable commercial area shall be developed within Tract A. 7.2 No building or structure, or part thereof, shall bc erected, altered or used. or land or water used, in ',','hole or in part. for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures I. The commercial uses are as tbllows: a. Group Care Facilities (category 1 & II); care units, subject to thc provisions of Collier County LDC Section 2.2.3.3.6; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to 400.402 F.S. and Ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to 651 F.S. and Ch. 4.183 F.A.C.; all subject to Collicr County I,DC Section 2.6.26. b. Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services (8721). c. Business services (groups 731 l, 7313, 7322-7331,7338, 7361, 7371. 7372, 7374-7376, 7379). d. Childcarc centers and adult day care centers (8351). c. Churches and other places of worship (8(o I). Depository institutions without drive-through (groups 6011-6099). g. Engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 8711- 8713). h. Health services (groups 8011-8049). i. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311-639'}, 6411). - 13 - , ~; 17B l.cgal services (81 I l ). k. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748) I. Medical Office (groups 8011 - 8049~ m. Miscellaneous personal services (72(~1). n. Non-depository credit institutions (groups 6141 - 6153). o. P, cal estate (groups 6531-6541 ) p. Schools, public and private (8211 ). q. Any other use which is comparable in nature xvitb thc foregoing uses and ,.,,hich tile l)cvclopment Scp.'ices Director determines to be compatible. B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the above permitted principal uses and structures, including vehicular garages or covered parking. 2. Essential services and facilities. 3. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with thc foregoing uses and wbich Development Services Director determines tt~ be compatible. 7.3 DEVELOPMI'~NT STANDARDS FOR TRACT A A. Site Area: Twenty thousand (20,000) square fcct B. Sile Width: ()ne hundred (100) feet C. Setbacks from PUD Boundaries: 1. Front Yard: Singlc Story Structure: Twenty-live (25) Feet Two Story Structure: Thirty-five (35) Feet Three Story Structure: Forty-five (45) Feet -14- 2. Side Yard: Twenty-five (25)Feet 3. Rear Yard: Seventy-five (75) Feet D. Maximum l leiglht of Structures: Thirty-Five (35) Feet. E. Maximum Number of Stories: Three (3) habitable floors. F. Distance Between Principal Structures: None, or a minimum often (10) feet with unobstructed passage from front to rear. G. Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures: One thousand (1,000) square feet per building on the ground floor. If. Architectural Common Theme: Structures within this Tract shall have a common architectural theme, inclusive ofcommon or compatible use of materials and colors. Structures must include the following common elements, 1. Primary L:xturior Walls: Stucco 2. Porches or exterior covered areas: Stucco or Wood Frame 3. Primary Roofs and Covered Parking: Clay or Cement, Tile; 5/12 ~oof pitch or greater 4. Parking and site lighting: Anodized Bronze Fixtures 17B "",i SECTION VIII I~ERMITTED USES & DINIENSIONA[. STANDARDS TRACT B 8. I PlJRPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations lbr lhe area designated on Exhibit "A". PUD Master Plan, as "Tract B-Transitinnal Uses". A maximum 0.45 floor area ratio of square footage shall be devdoped within Tract B. 8.2 No building or struclure, or part theroo£ shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used. in whole or in parl. fi~r other than Iht folhlwing: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: I. Group Care Facilities (catego~' I & Il); care units, subject to the provisions of Collicr County LDC Section 2.2.3.3.6; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to 400.402 F.S. and Ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to 651 F.S. and Ch. 4.183 F,A.C.; all subject to Collier County LDC Section 2.6.26. 2. Child care centers and adult da,',' cam centers (8351). 3. Churches and other places of worship (8661). 4. Schools. public and private (8211). B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures I. Accessoo' uses and structures customarily ass[miated with the above permitted principal uses and structures. 2. Essential services and facilities. 3. Customary accessory uses and structures, including vehicular garages or covered parking. 4. Recreational uses and facilities such as swimming pools and tennis courts. Such uses shall be visually and functionally compatible with the adjacent primary structures, which have use of such facilities. 5.An.',' other use which is comparable in nature vdth the foregoing uses and which thc Development Sen'ices Director determines to be compatible. - 16 - 8.3 I)EVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TRACT I?, A. Minimum Site Area: 2.25 Acres B. Minimum Site Width: 150 feet C. Setbacks for PUD Boundaries: 75 Feet i). Setbacks Internal to the PUD: 25 Feet: none if ureter unified control. E. Maximum Height of Structures: Thirty-five (35) Feet. F. Maximum Number of Stories: Three (3) habitable floors. G. Distance Between Principal Structures: None, or a minimum of ten (10) feel with unobstructed passage from front to mar. H. Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structures: One thousand (1,000) square feet per building on thc ground floor. I. Architectural Common Theme: Structures within this Tract shall have a common architectural theme, inclusive of common or compatible use of materials and colors. Structures must include the folloxving common elements. 1. Primary Exterior Walls: Stucco 2. Porches or exterior covered areas: Stucco or Wood Frame 3. Primary Roofs and Covered Parking: Clay or Cement Tile; 5/12 roof?,'h ,~r ~mater. 4. Parking and site lighting: Anodized Bronze Fixtures -17- SECTION IX TRANSPORTATION REQUII~,I.~MI£NTS The purpose of this Section is to set fimh the transponatkm commitments of the Project Developer. 9.1 The developer shall provide arterial level street lighting at ~hc PUD's singular access point on Pine Ridge Road. Said improvumcnt shall be in pla':e prior to the issuance of an>' Certificates of Occupancy. 9.2 The Developer shall provide a right turn lane at the project's proposed access from Pine Ridge Rond prior to the issuance ora Certificate of Occupancy. The Developer shall bear the cost of these improvements and such improvements are not subject to impacl fee credits. 9.3 The County may require an additional 10 feet of right-of-way for the widening of Pine Ridge Road prior to the issuance ora Certificate of Occupancy. The County may acquire the property in the form ora roadway easement for impact fee credits if acquired prior to the development of the subject property. 9.4 Pedestrian access shall be provided between all parcels and uses in the development, al tbe time of FinaI Site Development Plan approval for each individual tract. SECTION X UTII,ITY AND [:,NGINF, ERING RI[OUIRI£MI';NTS Thc purpose of this Section is to set forth thc utilities aod engineering commitments of Ihe Project Developer. I0.1 IJTII.ITIIiS A. Potable ,aatcr will hc supplied by thc Count? \Valor service system through au existing 12 inch main running cast and west on tile north side of Pine Ridge Road. All construction plans and technical spccificatkms for the proposed project shall bc reviewed and approved by the Planning Department, Engineering Review Services prior to commenccnmnt of construction. On-site water mains shall be installed by thc Developer at no cost to the Connty and shall bc master metered. All on-site water mains shall be ov.'ned and maintained b) the Dcvclnpcr. his assigns or heirs. B. Connection to the County sewer system shall hc to the County force main located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road. at no c,-,st to the County. Sewage shall be pumped by an on-site station to tile County system. All construction plans and technical specifications shall be approved by the Planning Department. Engineering Review Sen'ice. prior to construction. I0.2 ENGINF, ERING A. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to thc Planning Services Director for review. No constructiou permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed constructiot , in accordance with the submitted plans, is granted by the Planning Sen'ices 15iccctor. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of the Collier County I,and Devdol~ment Code, including those set lbrth ia Article Three (III). C. Thc I)cveloper. and all successors m interest to the I)eveloper shall be required to satisf)' the requirements of all Count)' development ordinances or codes in effect prior to or concurrent with any subsequent development order relating to this site. including Site Development Plans and any other application tbat '.'.,ill result in the issuance ofn final or local development order. -19. · - 178 SECTION XI \\:A'I'F.R MANAGF. MF~NT REQUIRF~MENTS Thc purpose of this Scctim~ is to set forth ti~e water management commitments off the Project Developer. I 1.1 Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to thc Development Sen'ices Director lbr review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed conslruclion, in accordance x~itla the submilted plnns is granlcd hy Planning Services Director. 1.2 Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with thc appropriate provisions uf thc Collier County Land Development Code. 1.3 I.andscaping. within thc water management areas, is permitted, except as prohibilcd by thc Collier County l.and Dcvclopmenl Code. 1.4 An excavation permit shall be required where applicable in accordance with Div. 3.5 of the l.and I)cxeh)pmcnt Code and South Florida Water Management District Rules. 1.5 'ibc sul!}cct property is currently under common ownership wid~ dm adjacent properly Io the east. Under this circumstance, a water management system may be shared wifll prope~y to the east and Ibc cypress area within this system as generally depicted on Ibc PUl) Master Phm. shall be preserved and enhanced. If Ibc ownership changes on thc propcmy to thc east. water management facilities may be shared with the ncccssao' casements in place. 1.6 Water management requirements of the PUD's individual developments shall be linked through thc proposed drainage easement, as shown on Exhibit "A" PUD Master Plan. which ouffalls lo thc sile'S eastern wetland preserve area. 1.7 A copy of the SFWMI) permit is required prior lo development plan appmva,. 1.8 For perimeter berm hcighls in excess of two feet. side slopes 4mil be at :, n,aximum of 4:1. -20- SECTION XII ENVIRONMEN'FAL REQUIP, EMENTS The purpose of this section is to scl forth thc environmental requirements of the Project Developer. 12.1 The project shall meet all pertinent environmental related requirements of the Collier County Growlh Management Plan, including thc Coastal Zone and Conservation Management Element, in effect at tile time that requests ;irc made for Site Development Plan approval. 12.2 A wetland preserve area is depicted on thc PUD Master Plan. This wetland is under common ownership with the adjacent property to thc cast. The project's plan for development is to preserve this wetland area in its entirety and to enhance it with shared water management between the two properties. 12.3 Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the state of Florida ' EnvironmcntaI Resource Permit Rules and bc subject to review and approval by Current Planning Environmental Review State Removal of c;,'otic vcgetation shall not be counted towards mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. 12.4 All conservation areas shall be designated ms conservation/preservation tracts or casements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat or site plan, whicbevcr is applicable, with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. In the event, thc prujcct does not require platting, ail conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or casements dedicated to an approved entity nr to Collier County. with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to thc uses and limitations similar to or as per Florida Statutes Section 704.06. 12.5 An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exr, tic-ffec~ plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservation area¢, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Review Staff for review and approvel prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 12.6 Proof of ownership £or tbc shared water management filr the adjoining property to thc east shall be provided to Current Planning Review Staff prior to Final Site Plan Approval. If the ownership cbangcs for lands to tile cast of tile subject property, water management facilities may bc shared witb the required casements. -21 - " i?B ' 12.7 The Developer shall retain the existing wetland preserve consisting of 2.59 acres, more or less. per the requirement of Ordinan~ 98-26. 12.8 Buffers shall be provided around wetlands, extending a least fifteen (15) feet landward from thc edge of wetland preserves in all places and averaging twenty-five (25) feet from thc landward edge of the wetlands to remain on silo. Where natural buffers arc not possible, structural buffers shall be provided in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules. 178 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the ~entieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-89 Which was adopted by the Board of County Cormnissioners on the 10th day of Novengoer, 1998, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Co~issioners of Collier County, Florida, this 12th day of November, 1998. DWIGHT E BROCK ~ , Clerk of Courts and~Cle~k Ex-officio to Boarcl of~b County Corar~lS s lon~ By: Ell~e Hof fma~ .. Deputy Clerk IL%SHED 0~: 10/~ COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: XXX Normal legal Advcnisemcm [] Other: (Display Adv.. location, etc.) Originating Dopy Div: Comm. Dcv. Serv./PIanning Person: t~t~,,.r., ]~2~.~,, Date: q 1z~. Petition No. (If none. give brief dcscr piton: V-98- 5 Petitioner: (Name & Address): R F~i~ed Purlner hi -Immoknlee 850 S. C'qlier Bk'd A t. 1701 Mar 34145 - Name & Address oran)' person(s) lo be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, atlacb Separate sheet) R. B: AD{Jcrson of YonnR, van Asscndcrp & Varnadoc,'P.a., ~01 Laurel Oak Drive, Suile 300, Naples, FL 34108 ' Hearing before BCC XXX BZA Oilier Ncv,'spapcr(s) Io be used: (Complete only ifimporlanl): XXX Naples Daily Nev,'s Oflmr [] Legally Requ red Proposed Text: (Include Icgal dcscriplion & common Ioc_.otion & Size: Petition No~n ce Anderson ofY u Assende and Vamadoc re resemJn R S G Family Lhnile Pa nershi -lmmokalee re uc tin a 30 fi v rian from 're niredfrontvardsclbackof30feetlo0feetalon then rthern r nvline an II foot variance fr m h r ui fro~ sclbackof30 fectto 19 feetalon theea tern ro rlvlineanda 10 foot variance from tbe re uiredfr n k 20feetalon II~e uthern ro re'line for ro r~ Iocatcdat601WeIDela;vare lmmokalocA a mens in ion4 47 oulh FGqn e 29 Eas~. om anion m VAC-98-OI9. Companion petilion(s), if any & proposed hc~mng date: .V..AC.98.019 Docs Petition Fcc include advertising cost? [~cs [] No If Yes. ~hal account should !w charged for advertising cost.~ 113-I38323-649110 Rcviev,'cd by:/~'~L '? .:Y ~' '- ~ t¢ Approved by: Division Head Date Count)' Manager Date List AItacbmcms: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For bearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person lo complete one coy and obtain Di%'ision Head approval bt submitting to County blanager. Note: If legal document is invol's'ed, be sure that ans' necessary legal review, t for same, is submitted to Count,.' At orncv before submitting to Count's' Manager. The Manager's office copies: ' - [] Count.,,' Manager agenda file: to [] Requesting Division [] Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original lo Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE RESOLUT'~ON NO, 98- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-98-15 FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED I.~; COLLIER COUMTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to estsb!ish, c$cr~inate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary fgr the protection cf the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance ~o. 91-i02) which establishes regu±ations for the zoning of particular ~eographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting cf variances; and WHEREAZ, the 3oars of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted 5cato ~f the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice ~s in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisabiilqy of a ~0-foot variance from :he required front yard setback of 30 feet to C feet along the northern property line, an 11 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 19 feet along the eastern property line and a i0 foot variance from the required front yard £et~ack of 2~ feet to 20 feet a!on~ the soutkern property line as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an RMF-16 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all ~pplicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Developnent Code for the unincorporaned area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Soard in public meeting assembled, and the Boa[d having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APFEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petit:on V-99-!5 filed by R. Bruce Anderson of Young, van Assenderp and 'Yarnadoe, representing RSG Family Limited Partnership- Im~okalee, ~ith respect 5o the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" be and the same hereby is approved for a 30-foo~ variance from the required front yard setDack of 30 feet to 0 feet along the northern property line, an 11 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 19 feet along the eastern proper~y line and a 10 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 20 feet along the southern property line as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", cf the RMF-!6 Zoning District wherein said property is located. BE IT ~ESOLVED that this Resolution relating.to Petition Number '7-98-15 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. ERCC?~, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. SERRY, Chairman Approved as ts Form an~_ Legal Sufficiency: Mar~o~ie 14. Student Assistant County Attorney -2- The southeast W of the Southwest W of the Southeast ~ of Section 4, Township 47 South Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. EXHIBIT '~B" !ii11111111111111111111111111111111111111111ii11111111111111111 r, oa]~,]:ollz C.oLl~.er count-~' c~. ~t:house ~ :~!~ (83,.3) 774,-84,08 , ,v. uuaJ:l'ao, (el.3) 77~.-8~06 Data oent:~ September 29, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: V-98-15 RSG Family Limited Partnership-I~nokalee ? Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in .,3 duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. ~ Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Purchase No. 113-138323-649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on 'i~mSDAY, NfIVE~BER 10, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition No. V-98-15, R. Bruce Anderson of Young, van Assenderp and Varnadoe, representing R S G Family Limited Partnership-Immokalee requesting a 30 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 0 feet along the northern property line, an 11 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 19 feet along the eastern property line and a 10 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 20 feet along the Southern property line for property located at 601 West Delaware (Immokalee Apartments) in Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East. (Companion to VAC-98-019). NOTE:All persons wishing to speak on any agenda ite~ must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesman for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case. written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and 'nereroze, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding~ is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMI~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BEERY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) l?C September 29, 1998 R S G Family Limited Parntership-Immokalee 850 S. Collier Blvd. Apt 1701 Marco Island, FL 34145 ~ Public Hearing to Consider Petition V-98-15 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10,1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure September 29, 1998 R. Bruce Anderson of Young, van Assenderp & Varnadoe, P.A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 Public Hearing to Consider Petition V-98-15 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10,1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25,1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 17C RESOLUTION NO. 98- 460 ......... = PETiTIOH .,UMBER V-98-15 FOR A VARiAHCE ON PPO?EPTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance Ilo. 91-i02) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board Of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted 5card cf the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after nc%ice as tn said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 30-foot 7ariance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 0 feet along the northern property line, an 11 foot variance from the required front yard setback o5 30 feet to 19 feet along the eastern property line and a 10 foot variance from the required front yarc se%a~c~ cf 30 feet to 20 feet along the southern property line as shown on the r!t-ached ?lot plan, Exhibit "A", in an RMF-16 Zone for the property hereinafter aescriDed, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoninc Pegulations of said Land Developm~nt Code for the uninccrpcra-e~ a~ea cf Cc!lief County; and -1- be and the same hereby is approved for a 30-foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 0 feet along the northern property line, an 11 foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 fee% to 19 feet along the eastern property line and a 10 foot variance fror~ the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 20 feet along the southern property line as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the RMF-i6 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following coodition: 1. This variance is for the structures as shown on Exhibit "A". Should these structures be removed or destroyed, regardless of cause, all subsequent re-construction shall comply wi~h the setback requirements of the Land Development e~=ec~ at the time of re-construction. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number V-98-15 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done t,his //CF day of ~z~--~ 1998. AT~ESTI'- i~ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT.. E~ B~C~, ~lerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Atte~ to ~halr~an'~ BAR~RA B. BERRY,k~~ A~'~ ~1~o Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjc~e M. Student Assistant County Attorney -2- The southeast ~ of the Southwest W of the Southeast W of Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. EXHIBIT .tt.r .t the po, t of"c. PtJE~.XS~IEO OH: 10/2~ Signature of Afftaflt ,,,,,., ,o. ,,,,,.r,~ ILRQUX.g'r FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IiEARI~'GS To: ~rk to the ~nrd: Please place Ihe foll~lng as a: ~ N~I ~ Adv~t ~ ~: ~ Adv., I~fi~ ~.) ~gi~ting ~ ~v: C~.~ ~l~ing P~: Rick ~ P~ No. (~ no~, give ~cfde~pq~): VAC 9~19 (DE~W~ A~E 850 ~ Colli~ ~lev~d. A~ 1701 ~ B~ ~ ~ ~l ~el ~ ~ve, Sui~ 3~ ~nple~, FI. ~108 (~t/ 2) ~ lie ofa~t~ ~ ~ H~g ~f~e ~ ~C 8~ ~ Naples ~y N~ ~ ~ ~lly R~ P~ed Text: flnclude [~=l delc~pllon & common ~ation & S~: P~l 11I~ VAC 9~19 TO D~, ~O~CE ~ VACA~ ~ ~LIC'S ~ ~T ~ A 5,Y BY 4Y ~R~ON OF Compamon petition, s), if any & proposed heanng date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost7 XXX Yes [] No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising cos~; 101-163610-649100 _ ./~ Dale ! County Admmm 'ttor ~nte I.iat AttachmcnLs I) Resolution ~,ath l~gal l)escrlption of Easement Vacation 2) List of DISTRIBUTION LNSTRUCTIONS A. For benrtngs before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy nnd obtain DlvlJlon tlel{~ npproval before submitting to County Manager, Note: If legal document Is Involved, be sure t~' ,I any ne~'.~,sa~y legal Mnneger's ofllce will dlJtrlbute copies: XXX Coun~ M.anager egenda file: XXX Requesting Division XXX OrllSn~! to Cllrk'! Office B. Other hearing: initiating Di'dsion head Io alZ~rovc and ~L, mit original to Clei'k's Offi~, rc~inmg a coplt lot file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: '~ RESOLUTION FOR PETITION VAC 9R-019 TO DISCLAIM. RENOUNCE AND ,I VACATE T]IE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A 5 Y BY 4~' PORTION OF RIGHT OF I 5 WAy ON DELAWARE AVENUE. LOCATED IN SECTION 4. TOWNSHip 47 6 SOb~FH. RANGE 29 EAST. IMMOKALEE. FLORIDA 7 J0 for {.he pcttuoncr. RSG Family Limltext Partncr~hip. Jmrno~loe. do{ri hcr~:by rexlucs~ Ibc vac. aI~o~ of a 55' by 37 ~]~'~F..4..~h~ ' ~ ' ":'- 17D MITCHELLB. THOMPSON P.A. a pan nfSection 4, To~nship 47 South. Ra ['e 2o :asr Collier County. Iqmida A parcel of land I.,.ing hi and being a part of Sectioa 4, Township 47 Sou:h, P~nge 29 EasL Collier Count.,,.. Florida and being more particularly, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeasx comer of the Southea~ I/4 ofthe Southwest I/4 of the Southeast I/4 of Section 4. Tov, nship 47 South. Raoge 29 EasL Collier Count.,,.. Florida: thence along the North line ofsaid parcel. North 89°-59'.56.' '9,'e~ 86.50 feet: thence lea',ing said Ntmh line South 00L00'.04- %Vest 24.50 feet to tl~e POINT OF BEGINNfNG of the parceI herein described; thence continuing South 000-00'.04" Wes~ 5.50 feet; thence North 89°.59'_56" West 45.00 feet; thence North 00'-00'.04- East 5.50 feet; thence South 89~'-59'.56- East 45.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING ofthe parcel herein described. Subject to easements and re~rictions of record: contianing275 Square feet more or less: lleadngs are assumzd ,and based on the Nord} line of the Southea_-r I;4 o!'thc Southx~est I/4 oftheSoutheast 1/4 of section being N 89.55.14 [:' MIT(]tELL 8 THO,MPSON . PL S --- 4957 Not ~alid unless embos:;ed ~ith the Professional's seal. ..................................... Sl~'t 2 of 2 P.O.6. NORTHEAS f CORNER OF ;,m: C~E~: SOUfHEASf ~- ~OOK ; PAGE 108 SOUfH'JEST I/4 OF ~HE SOU[HEAS~ ~ OF SEC liON ? TOWNSHJP 47S, "- RANG~ ~9 EAST - ~ -. ,o/; ~f ._ -' h -- '~ I~ '~:' ~' I ' ~ ~ I I L~ ~ ~1 CENERAL NOTES ~ CRAPHIC SCALE MITCHELL B. THOMPSON. p.A.I~°" :Paul Kane F~£LD BO0~ # (g4t) 352-6077 (inClud~ng t-his cove~) iilli11111111111111111111111111111111111111'1ii!ii!!!ii1111111111 ~ROHt LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse ,,~ FAX ~61 (813) 774-8408 P~ONZ'NO: (813) 774-8406 ate ~ent: /~1:,.//~ sent:~/;i¢~"~''/$ I October 6, 1998 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition VAC-98-019 Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 800835 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby Given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, A~inistration BuildinG, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition VAC-98-019, R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire~ representing RSG Family Limited Partnership-Immokalee, requesting to disclaim, renounce and vacate the public's interest in a 5.5' by 45' portion of riGht-of-way on Delaware Avenue, located in Section 4, Township 47 South, Ra~ge 29 East, Immokalee, Florida. NO~E: Ail persons wishinG to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or Group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a Group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or Graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearinG. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearinG. Ail material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COI~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBAP~A B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BY: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) October 6, 1998 RSG Family Limited Partnership-Immokalee . 850 South Collier Boulevard, Apt. 1701 Marco Island, FL 34145 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition VAC-98-019 . Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 6, 1998 R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition VAC-98-019 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissionezs on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure CLERK OF THE'~CIRCUIT COURT COUJER CO~NlrY CC)~R~HOUS~ P.O. ~ 41~ C~RCUmT COURT ~S ~t0t-~ COUN~ COURT r COUNTY RECORDER ~wi~t ~, ~roc~ ~ CLERK BOARD OF Cl~rk COUN~ COMMISSIONERS October 6, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition VAC-98-019 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Rpl P9 F. UT Ut. FCI~;~] 0C1';9! [DIGIIZG281B95][1871612666611 i FOLIO [g81Zf~2.86695] 01~![1{> fiT'Rl.q, HECTOg=& 1~914~ --PgE].II'IIINtl~-- STRItP 472904 691.6fi~,2E64 PO 80X 5273 * * * -x ORg/P! 1A93]/[I7231 19~8 TRX 9OLL ~ flHT ( fICgES i, .76i, lI'I48KAL£E FL 34143 5273 8.~ER TRS->147][29]i94! (:EgT-97-UgL 1998-PR';'1 LEGGL-1 4 47 Z9 S ZZOF~ OF U 196FT OF [ 11.] LM] $1 ll&Z~81 I -2 N//2 OF $E1/4 OF SE1/4, LESS L-USE ll~ ~l 969571 I 1617441 -3 3~T R/U ON k~ES OR 1693 PG I'I(T 8[ 1't6585] [ ~ I?73 RSD q[ 't1.1585] T I1:t372] CITRRENT-EX-flI~I' I'OXflBLE ,~( 116585] [ 113372] HI'tSTD-X $ I 9] 166~,-X S [ 6] I 5] CNTY ~,[ 412.16] ttSTU ~,[ CZU-X '~ [ 6] S-SL ~,! [,45.1S) ~ '~[ 62,15] UE[-X (~ [ 9] I'I[LL-RFITE S-LB $[ 28&.42! !SI)~l 77'!.17] BLD-X :~I 6] [16.BZ48J CITY ~;[ .16] UliOP Si' S.92] U[O-X e [ 9] -1997- BG-X '~ [ ~i, (1_997 TR~S) TOTRL ¢l k~-X $ [ 6] -CEg[]F]EO- SITE [~tt 166! O8/OGJ~gg~ 10.29 A~ l?O RESOLUTION NO. 98- 4a 1 RESOLUTION FOR PETITION VAC 9g-019 TO DISCLAIM. RENOUNCE AND VACATE TIlE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A 5.5' BY 45' PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ON DELAWARE AVENUE. LOCATED IN SECTION 4. TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST. IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA. WHEREAS. pursuant to Section 336.09 and 336. I 0, Florida Skatutcs, Bmcc Anderson. Esq.. as agcnt for the pctmoncr. RSG Family Limited Parmcrship-lmmokalcc. docs hercb} request the vacation of a 5.5' by 4fi' portion of Right of Way on Delaware Avenue, located in Section 4. Township 47 South, Range 29 East, [mmokalec, Florida: and WHEREAS. the Board has this da;,' hc[d a public hearing to consider vacating said road Right of Way as more £ulb' described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate `.~as given as required by law; and WIIEREAS, thc granting of thc ;acation ~;ill not ad'.crscl} al]ecl thc o;',ncrship or right of convenient NOW. '1 tlEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 'FILE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that thc following Road Right of Way is hcrcby vacated: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that thc Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to advertise the adop ion of this Resolution once m a paper of general circulation m thc Count,,. x~ithin 30 dais following its adoption. BE IT FURTttER RESOLVED, that the Clerk lo the Board is hereby directed to record a certified cop.', of this Resolution, thc proof of publication of thc notice of public hearing and the proof of publication of thc notice of adoption of this Resolution in thc Public Records of Collier Coun.y. Florida. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority ','otc fa;ortng .~'~nc. DATED: ~t.~off.~/~/ /? ~ ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNT'/' COMMISSIONERS ' DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COI.LIER COUNT'." 7 BY: ~) ~ ~'~) ' ~ttest as tO Chalr~k~n's ~~---~ signature only Approved as tO Iroml and Icga[ sufficiency: , i, , 2399055 OR: 2483 PG: 2203 OR: 2483 PG: 2204 MITCHELL B. THOMPSON P.A. 7elephor,e (~41~ LEGj a part of Section 4, Range 29 EasL Collier County, Florida A parcel orb, nd 13511g in and being a pan of Section 4. Tov.'nship 47 South, Range 29 I':nst. Collier County, Flurida and beitm more panicularly described as Follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of thc Southeast IA1 of the Southwe~ I/4 ofthe Southeast I/4 of Section 4, To.ship 47 South. Range 29 Ea~. ColIier County. ~ofida: thence along thc North I/ne of said parcel. North 89*-59'-%" We~ 86 50 feet .'them:c leaving said No,lb line South 00'-00L04" We~q 24.50 feet to the PO1NT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described: thence continuing South 00*-00L04" West 5.50 tbet: thence No~h 89:-59'-56" We~ 45.00 fect; thence No~h 00 -00-04 Eas~ 5.50 feet; thence South 89'-59'-56" Ea~ 45.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING oftheparcel herein described Subject to easements and re.fictions of record; comianing 275 Square feet more or less: Bearings arc assumed and hased on d,e No~h line of thc Southeast iAI ,,F-'._ 1,4of heSouthea>7 l,~g of section being N89-55-14 E MITCHELL B THOMPSON P L S '-' 4957 Not ,, :Ilid unless embossed ~Stlt the Pro£essional's seal. *** OR: 2483 PG: 2205 *** POC. N,qRIHEAS CORNER ar ,,~,: C I/4 OF P:. ~.' ~gg~: / FAG[ i08 SOUfHWEST SOU[HEAST ..... ~__ TO JNom~ ~7~, RANGE ;9 E~S' GENERAL NOTES I GRAPHIC SCALE B~ s~B ~3~ ~~-THOMPSON'_P-,x I'~i -Paul Kane i ~, 7D .'d~ (~iC:I, Im'Zl~ ,~rr~ Cuv~.) PAH P~RR~I,T, ~~: NAPLES DALLY NEWS ~ ~: 2~-4 7~ November 10, 1998 Ms. Pam Perrelt Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Adoption of Resolution 98-461/Petition VAC-98-019 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, November 15, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 912501 NOTICE OF ADOPTION Notice is hereby given that on the 10th day of November, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, adopted Resolution 98-461, re Petition VAC-98-019, pursuant to Section 336.09 and 336.10, Florida Statutes, Bruce Anderson, Esq., as agent for petitioner, RSG Family Limited Partnership-Immokalee, requesting the vacation of a 5.5' by 45' portion of right of way on Delaware Avenue, located in Section 4, Township 47 South, Range 29 East, Immokalee, Florida. Resolution 98-461 may be viewed in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, Minutes & Records Department, 4th Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. BOARD OF COUNTY COM/~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BY: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 17D PUBL~ SZ4EO Oe~: ^,.^=E: ~.~,~=. *** 2399056 OR: 2483 PG: 2206 *** FIL£D O~: ....................... ~i-----z · f ~:COmDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDM of COLLIgR COUHTY, FL ~ZT 7240 REFERENCE: 001230 912501 ~ is · rm~q~oer pubLta~ed at NapLes, in ~ ~s herO.ore ~ ~tt~sly ~, as ~ ~ ~s ~ ~ter~ es se~ class ~Z~EO ~: 10/26 11/~ COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IIEARINGS TO: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: XXX Normal legal Advcrlisemcm [] Olher: (Display Adv.. location, etc.) Ofi~fing Depg Div: Co~.Dev. Scn,.~I~ning Pe~n: ~ck Date: ~r 16. 1998 Petition No, (If none. give brief de~ripfion): AV 974331 ?cuffoner: (Name & Ad.ess): Jo~ ~meli. 2595 Linw~ Avenue, blqples. ~. 34112 Name & Address of~y ~n(s) m ~ notified by Clerk's O~: tIf mo~ ~a~ is ne~ a~ch ~te sh~t) 1) Ga~' Buffer. P.E, Butler Engin~fing. Inc. 2223 Trade Center Way Napl~, ~, 34109 (Agent) 2) S~ li~ of abutting pro~' o~e~ H~nng ~fore ~ BCC BZA ~er R~ues~ed H~nng~e: November 10, 1998 Newsier(s) to ~ u~: (Complete only ifim~mt): ~ Napl~ D~ly News O~er Pro~ Te~: (Incl~e le~ demfiption & m~on l~fion & Si~: PL 11 i'ION AV 97431 TO DISC~, ~O~CE ~D VACA~ ~ CO~'S ~D ~ P~LIC'S ~REST ~ A 60' ~DE ROAD ~G~ OF WAY SHO~ AS "PELTON A~UE" ON ~ P~T OF "B~E" AS ~CORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 2, P~LIC ~CO~S OF COLLIER. CO~, FLO~DA ~D BErG LOCATED ~ SEC~ON 11, TO.SHIP 50 SO~, ~NGE 25 EAST. Comp~on ~fifion(s), 5any & pro~ h~fing ~: D~ Petition F~ include adve~sing cost? ~,Ycs ~ No if Yes. w~t a~unt sh~d ~ c~g~ for DMsion ~md Date' Coun~ Manger Date List Attac~enm: 1) Remlution with E~ibit "A' & "B" 2) List of Abut*Jr', DIS~IBU~ON ~STRUC~ONS ~ For headn~ before BCC or B~: ~itiating pe~n to comple~ one copy and obt~u Did~ioa Head appmv~ ~fo~ mbmiffing to C~nty M~a~n Note: If le~ d~m¢nt i* ~lv~. ~ ~ ~at ~y n~e~a~ legfl ~, or ~qu~ for am~ i~ mbmitted to County ARomey ~o~ mbmi~ing to C~nty M~ager. ~e M~ager'~ office will di~bute copie~: ~ County M~ager agenda file: ~ Requeating Division ~ Od~a~ to Clerk'~ Office B. Other hmn~: l~fiafing Di~Ssion hind to apprm'e and mbmit ofigi~l to Clerk's Offi~. ~ning a m~ for FOR CLE~'S O~ICE USE O~: 2 O RF. SOLUTION FOR PETITION AV 97~31 TO DISCL~M. RENO~CE ~ND VACA~ ~tE CO~'S 4 ~I) ~[E PUBLIC'S ~T ~ A 60' WIDE RO~ RIGHT OF WAY SHO~ ~ "PEI.TON A~E" S ON ~tE PD~T OF "B~D~E" ~ RECORDED ~ PI~T B~K 4, PAGE 2. PUBLIC RECORDS OF 6 COLLIER COif. ~ORIDA AND BEING L~A~D ~ SE~ON I I. TO~SItlP 50 SO~I. ~GE 7 25 E~T. 8 9 ] 2 t%t B~k 4. Page 2. Pubhc Records of Colher Counb'. [%rid~ and ~m~ I~I~ m 13 ~ 4 WliER~. ~e t~d h~ ~is ~y hc~ · pu~ h~n~ ~o consider xa~6n~ ~ ~d fighl of ~, ~ ~ fully de~fi~ ~low. 20 Sc~ Er~ibil '%' almcb~ herelo and mco~n~ 2 ] BE IT I'IJR~tER RF2SOLVED BY 'HIE BO~D OF COI~ COMMISSIONFRS OF COLLIER CO~TY, FLORIDA. 22 the UtdiW Fa~mcnt. more ~aicularly d~fi~ in E~ibit "B" a~r~ch~ hereto and mco~ml~ 2~ ~ of gcn~ral circulalion in th~ Coun~ ~ithin 30 ~ys follo~ng ~ ~op6on 26 BE IT ~IER R~OL~D, thai ~ Cl~rk lo Ihe B~rd is h~e~ d~t~t~ Io r~gd a ~fi~ ~ of~h R~uti~. lh~ ~f 2~ of publication of Ibc noti~ of pubhc h~nng ~nd the pn~f of publi~ti~ of lhe not~ 29 30 A~: ~ OF C~ COMM~IO? :E~ 31 D~G~ E BR~ Clerk COLLIER CO~, ~.ORIDA 32 33 35 36 A~ov~ as to fo~ and legal 37 sufficiency: 40 l{fi~ F. ~hton 41 ~slsmt ~unW Atlorncy Prot*ess[onal l~nd SurveYor5 22Z3 Trade Center Naples, Florida 33942 Antonio Trigo, PI.S (941) 594.844 President FAX (941) 594.055 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ExMbit'A" Shc~ ! of 2 AV~31 Pelton Avenue, Burdale Subdivision, as r~corded in Plat Book 4, Page 2 o~ the Public Records, Collier County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of Lot i, Block 3, Burdale Subdivision; Thence run along the southerly right-of-way of Linwood Street North 89°28'40" East a distance of 60.00 feet; Thence South 00.28'20~ East along the easterly line of Pelton Avenue a distance of 135.69 feet to the southerly boundary of Burdale Subdivision; Thence South 89"23'50" West along said southerly boundary a distance of 60.00 feet to the westerly boundary of Pelton Avenue; Thence North OO"28'20" West along said westerly boundary a distance of 135.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 8,143.8 square feet. Prepared by. A. P.L.S. rtificate No. 2982 ow ~ber 25, 1997 sheet 2 of 2 for Sketch of Desc~ption. LINWOOD STREET 60' R/W ])earing ~asls N. Bg'£8'40'£. 60.00' P.O.B. Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 3 Exi~bit BURDALE S~*~ 2 of 2 P.B. 4, Pg. 2 AV97-031 Lot 1 Lot 15 Block 3 Block 2 8URDALE BURDALE i $.8~'P. 3'50'tF. bO. D0' VOO~ LAN'~ PAPK ~ ~: NOT A ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~IG0 & ~SOCIA~S, ~C. ~: N~. 2S ~997 ~ ~l ~ ~AY D~ ~: AT ~ N.T.S. ~ 17 UTILITY EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT. grated ~s y of May 1998 by: AV 97~3 KOBERT C~OLL ~d C~THIA C~OLL, ~SB~D ~D ~FE, [~ m ~t po~on of the e~ment ~ea over Lot 15, Bilk 2 B~e Su~ivisionl ~d JOSE LO~LI ~ND ~U~ LOMELI. HUSB~D ~D WIFE, [~ to ~t ~ion of ~e ~ent ~ea ov~ Lot 1, Block 3 B~d~e Su~ivision] ~ G~to~. to F.P.L., SPRINT & a~y ocher applicable u~l~y provider its successors ~d ~T~ ESS ETH: '~t the Gr~to~ for ~d in co~ide~6on cf thc sum of tan doll~ ($10.00) ~d o~cr val~blc co~idemtion p~d by ~e G~tee, receipt of w~ch is he,by ac~owledged. h~b) con~ e). gr~L bargain, ~d sell ~to ~e G~tce. :~ suc~s~rs ~d ~s~s, a ~t~, non- exclu~Nc c~emem. [iccnse. ~d privilege to ent~ u~n ~d to ~1 ~d m~ utili~ facilities. on ~e follox~ng desc~bed 1~ ~g I~ated in Collier Co~D', Florida, to ~t: that ponien of Pehon Avenue. B~d~e Su~ivision. ~ re~rd~ ~ P~t ~k 4, Page ?, of ~he P~biic Records, Collier Co~ty, FIo~ ~d berg more p~cul~ly d~sc6be. I as follows: Co~encing at the no~e~t comer of Lot 1. Block 3. B~le Subdi~ ision: Theoce ~n along the sou~erly fi~vo~-way of Linwood Street North 89~28' 40" E~t a dis~ce of 20.~ feet to ~e POINT OF BEGINN~'G; ~ence continue No~ 8~8'40" ~t a dis~ce of 20.00 feet: Thence South 00028'20" E~t a dis~ce of 125.72 feet; Ibc cc No~ ~9 -3 50 E~t adis~ce of 20.~ feet: ['hcncc Sou~ 00~8'20" F~t a ~s~ce of I0.00 feet; ~'hence 5ou~ 89~Y50" West a dis~cc of 60.00 f~t: ]'hcncc No~ 00~8'20" West a dis~ce of 10.~ feet; [hcncc No~ 8~Y50" ~t a di~ of20,~ f~t; Thence No~ ~8'20' We~ a dis~ of 125.75 to ~e PO~T OF BEGginG TO ~VE AND TO ttOLD ~e ~e ~to ~e Gr~tce ~d ib ~si~s, toge~er ~th ~e right to enter u~n s~d l~d. excavate. ~d ~e matefi~s for ~e maim~n~g ufiliw facilities thereon. (~tor ~d Gr~tee ~e us.:d tbr singu'.~ or plu~l. ~ the conteM requires. S[GN[D. SEAI.¢D Wimess __ -- ~ ROBERT CA~oLL Wimess ,. C~TftlA CARROLL Print Name ¢ JOSE LO~LI Pfint~ ~. Print N~e STA~ OF FI.O~A ~ CO~' OF COLLAR ~ 2 ~ ) execu~ ~e ~e. STA~ OF FLORA CO~' OF CO~IER D~O~ ~Y P~P~D ~c~d S. ~au I~ Tami~fi T~I North, Suite 201 Naples, Floh~ 34102 941-263-8282 LINWOOD STREET i 60' R/W F..,~a-~~ _~ Bearing ]~O, Sl$ N. g9'28'40'E. 60,00' AV 97-o31 P,O.C. ~0. o0' / ~o. oo' P.O~ No~he~st corner of Lot I, Block 5 BURDALE P.B. 4, Pg. 2 Lot 1 Lot 15 Block 3 Block 2 BURDALE BURDALE ~ $.89'23'50'tv'. 60.00' 'A VODD LAND PARK CD~[~. NO;ES: 2) ~ Un~ S~ ~ P.~ ~, ~, 2, NOT A S~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~g ~ ~AY D~ ~: AT E~ N.T.S. ~. ~A ~ SHE~ 2 OF 2 R~ NO. 98,~5~ : Rpl Pa Fm UT UL FCIC210CITR] IDI258882888831i838338128881l ] FOLIO 125888288883] OgNER> TONEY, RONALD S:& ROSEANN N STRAP 847688 1 185All 2715 LINgOOD AVE ~ ~ ORB/PI 1387]/128191 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 8][1187] ~ ~ S ANT [ 788881 ACRES I ,3]1 NAPLES FL 341]2 4733 AREA Cg TRS->[5811251111! CERT-96-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 BORDALE OLK ! LOTS 18 + 1! OR [ 81! LND SI 1688811 21688] -2 1387 PG 2819 L-USE IHP $I 788681 i 88857] -3 N~T SI 948681 I 182457] -4 ASD+AGADJ SI 948681 CURRENT-EX-AMT TAXABLE ~l 6986811 ?27861 HMSTO-X S i 25888I MILL-COOE 188~-X ~ I 81 I 1121 CNTY Sl 278.94] ~STU $l 68.28] CIU-X ~ I 81 S-SL ~l 424.~71 gXl] SI 48.86] UET-X S I 81 MILL-RATE S-LB SI 18~1.3]] lSD $I ]22.38] BLD-X S I 81 I15,38681 CITY ~l .881UAO? SI 3.89] YID-X $ I 8] -1997- AG-X S I 81 (1997 TAXES) TOTAL ~1 ~-X S [ 81 -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA LINgOOD i~[ 2115] RES47? 1~1~1997 02:01 PM Apl Pg Fm UT UL FC1~2] OC[NR] ID[258883288821183833812888][ ] F0LIO i25888328882] OWNER) JONES JR, HAROLD A STRAP 847608 I 125All 2695 LINWOOD AUE ~ , , , , ~ , , ORB/P[ 13881/I 261] -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE I18I[1888] ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ 9 AHT [ 558881 ACRES [ .15] NAPLES FL 34112 4787 AREA CW TRS->158]i25][111 CERT-96-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 BURDALE BLK I LOT 12 OR 1388 i 81] LND $[ 84881 [ ]88881 -2 PG 261 L-USE IHP 9i 388]7] [ 3]8781 -3 PIXT 91 392171 [ 426?8] -4 ASD+AGADJ ~[ 39217] [ 48394] CURRENT-EX-ANT TAXABLE ~l 14217] [ ]5394] UHSTD-X ~ [ 25888] HILL-CODE 188X-X ~ ! 81 [ 1121 CNTY 9[ 57.371 HSTU $1 14.44] CIU-X 9 [ 8] S-SL 8[ 89.81] WXB 9[ 8.65] UET-X 9 [ 81 HILL-RATE S-LB 9[ 3~.871 I$D 9! 25.891 BLD-X 9 [ 8] [15.3868] CITY 91 .88] UADP ~1 .821 WIO-X 9 [ 81 -1997- AG-X $ [ 81 (1997 TA~ES) TOTAL ~[ 236.851 WH-X ~ I 8] -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA LINWOOD ~E ~6951 RES4?? 1~1~1997 02:01 PM Rpl Pa F. UT UL FC[~.] OC[NR] ID[25888368884][63833812888][ ] FOLIO [25888368884] OWNER> SPINK, NORI"I~N E:& ESTHER J STRAP 847688 1 135A11 2772 GULFUIEU DR ~ ~ ~** ~ ~ ~ ORB/P[ 1295]/[1314} -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE I 8][8987] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ AHT I 45888] ACRES [ ,15I NAPLES FL 34112 5839 AREA CW TRS->158112511111 CERT-96-UAL CERT-9?-UAL LEGAL-1 BURDALE BLK 1 LOT 13 OR 1295 [ 811LND $1 8488] [ 18888] -2 PG 1314 L-USE IMP ~l 284641 [ 294211 -3 MXT $[ 36864] [ 48221] -4 ASD+AGADJ ~[ 36864] [ 48221] CURRENT-EX-AXT TAXABLE 8[ 36864] [ 48221] HHSTD-X 8 [ 8] HILL-CODE 186~-X $ [ 6] [ 112] CNTY 8( 149,89] HSTIJ8! 37,721 CIU-X 8 [ 81 S-SL 8[ 2~1.65] YI'IB81 22,69] UET-X 8 [ 61 HILL-RATE S-LB 8I 1~.17] iSD 9[ 67.65] BLD-X $ [ 8] [15.3866] CITY ~[ .681 URDP 9[ 2,151 WID-X 8 I 6] -1997- AG-X $ [ 81 (~997 TAXES) TOTAL 81 618.831 UH-X 8 ( 6] -CERTIFIEO- LOCATION INA LINUOOD AVE 26791 RES477 1~12/1997 02:02 PM Ap! Po Fm UT UL FCIC210C[NR] IO[258864BB803][83833812888]I I FOLIO i25888488883] OWNER> FRANKLIN, LELA STRAP 847688 l 145All 2647 LINWOOD AVE ORB/P[ 11281/[ 342] -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE BATE [ B118585i $ ANT [ ACRES I .341 NAPLES FL 34112 4787 AREA CW TRS->i5BI[25]Illl CERT-9£-VAL CERT-97-VAL LEGAL-1 BURDALE OLK 1 L0TS -2 711 PG 763 & 1128 PG 342 L-USE IHP -3 HKT 91 51695] [ 58545] -4 ASD+AGADJ 91 51695] I 53246] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE 3[ 26195l [ 27746] RHSTD-X $ [ 25888] HILL-CODE 1882-X ~ I 0] [ 112] CNTY 91 183,391HS'IU ~1 26.02] CIU-X $ I 0] S-SL ~[ 161,87] WHO 9[ 15,59] UET-X $ [ BI HILL-RATE S-LO ~[ 71,86] ISD ~[ 46,67] BLD-X ~ [ 8] I15.3860] CITY ~1 .OBI UADP ~[ 1,481 WIO-X ~ [ 500] AG-X $ [ 0] (1997 TAXES) TOTAL ~[ 426,88] ~H-X $ [ 0] -CERTIFIED- LOCATION iNA LINWOOD AU[ 2A47] RES477 12/12/1997 02:02 PM Ap! Pg F~ UT UL :FCIC2] OC(NR] I0125888446885][83833812888]! FOLIO (25888448685] OWNER> GREEN, DOUGLAS J=~ SHARON L STRAP 847608 I 1GSA11 2631 LIN~OOO AVE ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ORB/P[ 1962]/1 941 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE 1271!86941 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ANT [ 685881 ACRES [ .19! NAPLES FL 34112 4?8? AREA CW TRS->t5811251111! CERT-96-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 BURDALE BLR 1 LOT 16 OR 1962 [ 81] LI~D $[ 199891 I 129681 : -2 PG 94 L-USE %PiP 8[ 38596! [ 3288&] -3 NXT 8! 4867~] [ 44966] -4 ASO+AGADJ ~( 48676] ! 4!8961 CURRENT-EX-ANT TAXABLE 81 15676] [ 16896] HHSTD-X 8 [ 258881 RiLL-CODE 188~-X ~ [ 81 [ 1121 CNTY $1 62,961 XSTU 8[ 15,851 CIU-X ~ [ 81 S-SL ~1 98,57] UXB 8[ 9,581 UET-X ~ ( 81 HILL-RATE S-LB $[ 43.761 ]SD 8[ 28,42] BLD-X ~ [ 81 [15.3868] CITY $( .88] VADP 8[ .98] UID-X $ [ 8] -1997- AG-X ~ ( 81 (~Y97 TAXES) TOTAL 81 259.96] UX-X $ I OI -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA LINWO00 AUF ?~31] RES477 12112/~997 02:02 P~ Ap! Pg Fm UT UL ;FCIC2] OC[NR] ID[25888488887][83833812888][ ] F0LIO 125888488887] OWNER> ROWE, dANES A STR~P 847688 1 175Al1 ROWE, ERIC dACKSON * ~ * * * ~* * ORB/P[ 28951/121%] 2725 DAUIS BLD -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 1118995] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ flHT [ 81 ACRES [ .191 NflPkES Fk 34184 4334 AREA CW TRS->158112511111 CERT-gfi-VflL CERT-97-Uflk LEGflk-1 BURDflkEOkK 1 kOT 17 [ 881 LN8 ~[ 188881 [ 129681 -2 L-USE INP$1 351871 I 3fi4181 -3 HKT ~I 452671 [ 493781 -4 ASO~AGADJ ~l 452671 [ 47123] CURRENT-EX-ANT TAXABLE ~[ 197G71 [ 22223] HNSTD-X S [ 8] NILL-CODE 188X-X $ I 81 I 112] CNTY SI 82.81] HSTU ~[ 28.84] CIU-X S I 81 S-SL SI 129.651 IJliB $1 12.491 UET-X $ [ 81 NILL-RATE S-LB $[ 57.56] ISD $1 37.38] BLD-X ~ [ 81 115.38681 CITY ~[ .88l UflDP91 1.19l WID-X ~ I 81 -1997- AG-X ~ [ 81 (1997 TA~ES) TOTAL ~[ 341,92] WH-X ~ ( 8I -CERTIFIED- LOCATION iNA LINWOOD RUE 25951 RES4?7 12/1~1997 02:02 PM Rpl Pg F~ UT UL FCIC2] OCINR] I012568852966£][838338128B8l[ ] FOLIO I25888528888l O~NER> ROYE, JAMES A STRAP 84788B 1 185811 ROtJE, ERIC JACKSON ~ ~ ORB/P[ 2B951/[21981 2725 DAUIS BLUD -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 11[89951 ~ ~ $ flHT I 01 ACRES [ .17] NAPLES FL 34184 4334 AREA TRS->{581(25][111 CERT-98-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-Z BURDALE BLK I LOT 18 [ 881LND Si 92481 [ 11888] -2 L-USE Ii"lP ~1 8] [ -3 XKT ~[ 924B] [ ~18881 -4 ASD+AGAOJ ~i 92481 [ 11888] CURRENT-EX-RXT TAXABLE ~i 9248] [ 1188B] HMSTD-X $ [ BI HILL-CODE 188~-X ~ [ 8 [ 112] CNTY ~[ 44.27] HSTU 9[ CIU-X ~ [ 8 S-SL ~i 89.31] YM8 ~i 8.671 UET-X ~ I B HILL-RATE S-LB ~[ 38.771 ISD 9[ BLD-X ~ [ 8 [15.3888] CITY ~[ .8BI UADP ~[ .64] Y]D-X ~ [ 8 AG-X ~ [ 8 {1997 TAXES) TOTAl $[ ~82.79] YX-X $ [ 8 -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA L]NNOOD AUE 2595] RES47? 12/1~1997 0202 PM Apl ?~ F. UT UL FCIC2] OCINR] I0125888568888][83833812888][ l FOLIO [25888568888] OVNER> BRANDT, DARWIN E:& DORIS R STRAP 847688 1 195All 2563 LIN~OOD AUE ~ ORB/P[ 14631/[ 3541 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE {17][88891 ~ $ AMT { 55888[ ACRES [ .17] NAPLES FL 34112 4?94 AREA C~ TRS->[5011251{lll CERT-96-VAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 BUROALE BLK 1 LOT 19 OR 1463 [ 81] LNO ~! 92481 ! 118881 -2 PG 354 L-USE II'IP $1 31446! [ 32512] -3 NAT $[ 486861 [ 44392] -4 ASD}AGADJ ~[ 48686] [ 41987] CURRENT-EX-AMT TAXABLE $[ 15686] [ 16987] :HMSTD-X ~ { 258881 MILL-CODE 188X-X ~ [ 8] [ 1121 CNTY 81 63.881MSTU 8[ 15.851 CIU-X $ [ 8] S-$L 8[ 98.641 ~HB ~[ 9.58] UET-X $ [ 81 MILL-RATE S-LB 8[ 43,791 ISO 81 28.441 BLD-X ~ [ 81 115,38681 CITY 8! ,88] UAgP gID-X ~ [ 81 -1997- AG-X $ [ 8] (1997 TAXES) TOTAL gH-X $ [ 8] -CERTIFIEO- LOCATION INA LINGO00 AUE 25631 RES4?7 12/12/1997 02:03 P~ Rp! Po Fm UT UL FC[~2I OC[NRI ID[25881888884l[83833812888][ FOLIO [25881888884] O~NER> CUNNINGHAH JR, REGIS A STRAP 847608 2 115All PO BOX 9656 ~ , ~ ~, ~ , ~ ORB/Pi 1562]/[]683] -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 2111898l ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ANT i 518881 ACRES [ .23] NAPLES FL 34181 9656 AREA CY TRS->158]125][]11 CERT-96-UAL CERT-9?-UAL LEGAL-] 8URDALE BLK 2 LOTS 1! + ~ 1/2 i 811LND $1 12688] I 16288] -2 OF LOT 18 OR ]562 PG ]683 L-USE IHP $1 237431 [ 24892] -3 HgT ?i 36343] [ 4i8921 -4 ASD+AGADJ 71 36343] [ 41892] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE $[ 36343] [ 41892] HHSTO-× S [ 8] HILL-CODE ]88~-X ~ [ 8] [ ]12] CNTY $1 153.131 HSTU $[ 38.54] CIU-X $ I 81 S-SL Si 239.73] YXB ~i 23.89] UET-X S I 81 HILL-RATE S-LB SI 186.43] ISD ~[ 69.121 BLD-X S [ 81 [15.3868] CITY ~1 .88] UAOP ~l 2.28] YIO-X ~ [ 81 -1997- AG-X ~ [ 8] (]997 Tfl~ES) TOTAl. ~[ 632.241 YH-X ~ [ 81 -CERTIFIED- LOCATION iNA LINWOOD AUE 2716] RES477 12/1~1997 02:04 P~ Rpl Pa Fm UT UL FCIC210C[NRI ID[258818488861183833812888][ ] FOLIO [25881848886] OWNER> KOHLHAGEN, JAY W=& JOANNE M STRAP 847688 2 125All 2696 LINWOOD AUE ** ****** ORB/P[ 18651/[19161 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 81[82841 ** ~ ~ ~ ~ ~* ~ AHT I 408881 ACRES [ .15] NAPLES FL 34112 4?84 AREA CW TRS->I581[Z5]IllI CERT-96-UAL CERT-9?-UAL LEGAL-1 BURDALE BLK 2 LOT 12 OR 1865 I 811LND ~' ~, 84881 { 18888! -2 PG 1916 L-USE INP $! 34631] [ 35863] -3 MT $1 43831] [ 46663] -4 ASD+AGADJ $[ 43831] [ 44322] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE $1 ]8831] [ 19322] HHSTD-X ~ I 258881 HILL-CODE 188X-X ~ [ 8] [ 1121 CNTY ~i 72.88] MSTU $! 18.12] CIU-X $ i 8] S-SL ~l 112.721 WI"lB ~[ 18.86] VET-X $ I 81 MILL-RATE S-LB $1 50.84} lSD $I 32.58] 8LD-X ~ I 81 115.38681 CITY ${ .881VADP $1 1.83] WID-X S I 81 -1997- AG-X $ { 81 (1997 TAXES) TOTflL $[ 297,271 WH-X $ [ 81 -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA LINWOOD AVE 26961 RES47? 1~12/1997 02:04 PM Rpl Pa Fm UT UL FC[~2I OCINRI IDI258816886881[83833812B881[ ] FOLIO i258818888881 OWNER> GRINOLDS, DARNELL D STRAP 847688 2 135Al1 268B LINUOOD AUE ORB/PI 22641/124821 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [261112961 ACRES [ .16] NAPLES FL 34112 4?84 AREA CW TRS->[58][25][11] CERT-96-UflL CERT-9?-U~L LEGAL-1 BURDALE BLK 2 LOT 13 [ 81] LND ~I 8488] [ 18888] -2 L-USE IHP Si 25554] [ 26464] -3 HKT 3[ 33954] [ 3?264] -4 RSD~AGRDd SI 33954] I 349?3] CURRENT-EX-RHT TAXABLE 3[ 8954] [ 99?3] , HHSTD-X ~ [ 25B80] HILL-CODE 1882-X ~ [ 8] [ 112] CNT¥ 8[ 37.16] HSTU 8! 9.36] CIU-X $ [ 8] S-SL 3[ 58.18] gHB 8! 5.68] UET-X $ I 8J HILL-RATE S-LB 8[ 25,83] ISD 8[ 16.78] BLO-X ~ [ 8] [15.3868] CITY Si WID-X $ [ 8] flG-X ~ [ 81 (1997 TAXES) TOTeL 8[ 153.44! WH-X ~ [ 8] -CERTIFiEO- LOCATION INA LINWOOD AOE 2688] RES4?? 12/12/1997 02:05 PM J Apl Pg F. UT UL FC[~2I OC[NR] I01258811288871[83833012888][ ] FOLIO [25881128887] OUNER> XARRAFFINA, NARIA CARLA STRAP 847688 2 145All GIOUANNI NARRAFFINO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORB/Pi 1685]/[19981 137 XARUIE RUE -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 9][8491] ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N 5 AHT [ 8] TORQNTO QNTRRIO ACRES [ ,16] CANADA H6E 4 K5 8REA CN TRS->[SBII251[ll] CERT-96-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 OURDALE BLK 2 LOTS 14 OR 1685 [ AB] LNA 5[ 84881 [ 18888] -2 PG 1998 L-USE IHP 51 81 [ 81 -3 HKT 5[ 84881 [ 188881 -4 ASDtAGROJ 9[ 84881 [ 18888] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE 9[ 84881 [ 18888] HHSTO-X ~ [ 81 HILL-CODE 188g-X ~ [ 81 [ 1121 CNTY 9[ 48,25I li6TU ~( 18.131 CIU-X ~ [ A] $-SL 9[ 63.811 WHO 9[ 6.871 UET-X ~ [ BI HILL-RATE S-LB 9[ 27.971 ISD 8[ 18.17] OLO-X $ [ BI I15.38681 CITY 8[ .88] UADP 8[ .58] WlO-X ~ [ BI -1997- AG-X ~ [ 81 C1997 TAXES) TOTAL 8[ 16~.18] WH-X ~ [ 81 -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA LIN~OOD ~!:~ 26641 RES47? 1~12/1997 02:05 PM FCIC2] OC[NR] ]D125881168889][83833812888][ FOLIO [2§8811G8889~ OWNER> CARROLL, ROBERT M:& CYNTHIA L STRAP 047608 2 155All 2648 LIN~OOD AVE ~ ~ ORB/P[ 19741/{ 143] -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 5110894] ** $ AMT [ 660001 ACRES I ,191 NAPLES FL 34112 4704 AREA TRS->15B1[251II11 CERT-96-OAL CERT-9?-VAL LEGAL-1 BURDALE SUBD 8Lff 2 LOT 15 OR [ 011LND $[ 188881 [ 129681 -2 1974 PG 143 L-USE IMP $I 342721 I 355251 -3 MKT $1 4435211 484851 -4 ASD+AGADd $[ 443521 ! 456831 CURRENT-EX-AMT TAXABLE ~! 19352] ! 286831 BNSTD-X $ I 250001 MILL-CODE 188X-X $ I BI I 1121 CNTY $1 77.071MSTU $1 19.481 CIV-X ~ I 01 S-SL $! 128.661 ~ $! 11.621 UET-X ~ [ 81 HILL-BATE S-LB ~l 5~.571 lSD $[ 34.791 BLO-X $ I 81 I15.3868] CiTY $1 .881UABP $[ 1.11] WID-X $ [ BI -1997- AG-X $ [ BI (1997 TAXES) TOTAL $[ 318.22] ~H-X $ [ BI -CERTIFIED- LOCATION iNA LIN~OOD R~.~F ~64B1 RES4?7 12/12/1997 02:05 PM Rpl P9 F~ UT UL FC[~]2] OC[NR] 1D[25881288888][63833812888][ ] FOLIO [25881288888] OWNER> LOHELI, JOS£:& HBURA STRBP 847688 3 15Ali 259G LINWOOD RUE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORB/P[ 2888]/[ 489[ -1997 TBX ROLL- SALE DATE [19][8795] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ANT [ 555881 ACRES [ .]91 MAPLES FL 34112 4781 AREA TRS->[SB][25][]][ CERT-gG-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 BURDALE BLR 3 LOT ] OR 2888 [ 811LNO 51 18888] [ 12968] -2 PG 489 L-USE IXP 9[ 288?3] [ 21847] -3 HRT 5[ 38153] [ 3488?] -4 ASD+AGADJ ~[ 3B153] [ 31858] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE 51 5]53] [ HHSTD-X ~ [ 25888] HILL-CODE 188~-X ~ [ 8[ [ l12J CNT? 9[ 22.5?] HSTU ~[ CIU-X ~ I 8J S-SL ~[ 35.34] ~ 9[ 3.48] UET-X $ ( 8] HILL-RATE S-LB 9[ lA.GA! ISO ~[ 18.19] BLD-X $ [ 8] [15.3868[ CITV $[ .88] UADP ~[ .32] WID-X ~ I 8] -1997- flG-X $ [ 01 (1997 TAXES) TOTflf. 9[ 93.28] Wfl-X ~ I 8] -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA LINWOOD e~ ~5~6] RES477 Rpl Pu Fm UT UL FCIC2] OCiTR] ID[2588]248888][83833812888i[ ] FOLIO [25881248888] ONNER> SHITH, T]XOTHY & T]FFANEY A N STRAP 847688 3 25All 2526 LINUOOD AUE ~ ~ ORB/Pi 17411/[ 711] -1997 TAX ROLL- SOLE BATE [ 4I[8892! ~ ~ $ ANT i 755881 ACRES i .171 NAPLES FL 34i12 4781 AREO TRS->{58]125{[il] CERT-9£-UOL CERT-97-UOL LEGAL-1 BURDALE BLK 3 LOT 2 OR ~741 { 811LNB ~i 92481 [ li888{ -2 PG 7il L-USE IHP ~i 42259] ! 43771] -3 HKT ~[ 51499] [ 55651] -4 ASD+AGADJ ~1 51499] [ 556§1] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE ~1 26499] [ 55651] HHSTD-X ~ [ 8] HILL-CODE 1882-X ~ [ 81 i 1121 CNTY Gl 287.39] NSTU ~i 52.281 CIU-X ~ [ 81 S-SL ~! 324.67] ~HB ~[ 31.27] UET-X ~ I 81 HILL-ROTE S-LB ~1 1~4.141 lSD $[ BLD-X $ [ 8{ [15.38681 CITY ~l .88] UADP $[ 2.981 UID-X ~ i 81 -1997- AG-X $ i 81 ~1997 TOXES) TOTAL G[ 856.261 UH-X $ i 8] -CERTIFIED- LOCATION [NO LINNOOD AUE 2526] RES4?7 12/lY1997 02:16 PM Rpl Pq Fm UT UL FCIC2] OC[NRI ID[25081280882][83833812088][ 1 FOLIO [2§881288882] OWNER> DESUARISTES, ERIC STRAP 847688 3 35All 2522 LINWOOD AUE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORB/PI 23291/[ 7871 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE { A1187971 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 AHT [ 758881 ACRES [ .261 NAPLES FL 31112 4781 AREA Cg TRS->~58~I2511111 CERT-gG-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 OURDALE BLK 3 LOTS 3 + E 28FI I 881LND $[ 139441 [ 179281 -2 OF LOT 4 L-USE IBP 8[ 395181 [ 48989] -3 HKT 8[ 534541 [ 588371 -4 ASD+AGBDJ 8[ 53454] I 58837] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE 8[ 534541 [ 58837] HHSTD-X 8 [ 25888 HILL-CODE 188X-X ~ I 8 [ 112] CNTY 81 219,26] HSTU 81 55.18] CIU-X $ [ 8 S-SL 8[ 34~.261 WNR 8[ 33.871 UET-X $ I 8 HILL-RATE S-LB $1 152,391 lSD 81 98,991 BLD-X 8 [ 8 [15.38681 CITY 81 .881VADP Si 3.151 WID-X $ [ 8 -1999- AG-X 8 [ 8 (1997 TAXES) TOTAL 81 985.281 WH-X 8 [ O -CERTIFIr~-- LOCATION [NA LINWOOD AVE 2522] RES4?? 12/12/1997 02:05 PM Apl PQ Fm UT UL EC(~2J OCINR] IDI2588132888]][83033812688][ ] FOLIO (25881328881! OUN£R> PFISTER, DAUID:& BETTY LOU STRAP 047688 3 45All 3478 LA~EUIEU DR ~ , , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ORB/P[ 19841/I 6501 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [13]10194I ~ , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ $ A~T [ 63080I ACRES I .26I NAPLES FL 34112 S824 AREA C~ TRS->[§0I[25)[111 CERT-96-UAL CERT-9?-UAL LEGAL-1 BUROALE BL~ 3 ~ 2?FT OF LOT 4 [ OB] LND ~ 13944I ! 1792B) -2 + ALL LOT 5 + E 1FT OF LOTS 6 L-USE IMP $[ 41524] [ 42995] -3 + 7 OR 19B4 PG 658 MKT SI 5546B1 ! 6R923] -4 ASD+AGADJ SI 5.5468] [ 6B923] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE SI 5546B] [ 6R923] HHSTD-X S I O] HILL-CODE 188~-X S [ 8] [ 112] CNTY SI 227.B3] MSTU 8[ 57.14] CIU-X S [ BI S-SL SI 355.42] ~MB 8[ 34.24] UET-X S [ 81 HILL-RATE S-LB SI 157.79] ISO 8[ 182,47] BLD-X ~ [ 81 [15.3860] CITY SI .80] VAOP $[ 3.26] ~IO-X ~ I 0) -1997- AG-X S i 0] (1997 TA~E$) TOTAL SI 937.35] NH-X ~ [ 81 -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA LINNOOD RUE 2528] RES47? 1~1~1997 02:06 PM Ap! Po Fm UT UL FCIC2] OC[TRi ID[£18339£888BlI83833812888][ ] FOLIO [61833968888] OWNER) UILD PINES OF NAPLES iNC STRAP ~7888 838.8885A~! N[CHOLSON LTD PARTNERSHIP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORB/Pi 2364]/[3833] 2745 WILD PINES LN # 519 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE 120111197] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ AHT I 0] ACRES [ 10.87] NAPLES FL 341~2 4753 AREA TRS->[50][25][~Z] £ERT-96-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 N G & T C L F HZ LOT 3B,. [ B3) LND ~l SS~TBB] ( 5567BB1 -2 LESS OR 13~7 PG 5~ AND LOTS L-USE INP 5( 14R~538] [ 1394918] -3 ~,2,3,4,5,20 iN BURDflLE BLOCK HKT 5[ ~963238] [ -4 1 flSD~flGflDJ ~[ 19~3238] [ ~95~%8] CURRENT-EX-flHT TAXABLE 5[ ~9~3238] i HHSTD-X 5 I 8] MILL-CODE ]BB~-X $ [ 81 [ ~2] CNTY 5[ 7~72,7B1 HSTU ~l ~838,4Z] C]U-X ~ [ 8] S-SL 51 ~385.741 ~B ~[ 1B96,8~] UET-X ~ [ 8] MILL-RATE S-LB 5[ 505~.~9] ]SD ~[ 3282.82] BLD-X ~ [ 81 [~5.38~B] CITY 5[ .OBi UADP $[ flG-X 5 [ 8] (]997 TAXES) TOTAL 5[ 38827.59] YH-X 5 [ 8] -CERTIFIED- LOCATION iNA WILD PINES 14~1 RES477 12/12/1997 02:17 PM Ap! Pg Fm UT UL FC[~2] OC[NRI IDI6~834848808][83833812888][ FOLIO i~834848888] O~NER> FORSYTH ET UX, ~]LL]AH E STRAP 117888 832,8885A]] 2572 LEE ST ORB/P[ 347111 7]] -]997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE I 8](8888] 5 ANT [ 8] ACRES i 4.841 NAPLES FL 34112 4728 AREA CW TRS->[50][25]111] CEAT-.gG-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 N G + T C L F NO 2 11 58 25 W [ 88] LN§ 5( 122589] i 122589] -2 537,32FT OF LOT 32 OR 347 PG L-USE IHP 5[ 84876] [ 87781] -3 71 HAT $[ 286585] i 218298] -4 ASO+AGADJ 5[ 286585] [ 218298] CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE ~[ ]81585] ! ]85298] HXSTD-X $ [ 25888] XILL-CODE ]88X-X $ ( 81 [ 112] CNTY ~( £98.49] XSTU ~[ 173.78] CIU-X 5 [ 8] S-SL $1 1888.98] YXB 8[ ]84.13] UET-X 5 [ 8] HiLL-RATE S-LB ~[ 47~,98] BLO-X ~ I 8] []5.38G8i CITY 51 .88] UADP ~( 9.91] WID-X 5 [ 81 -]997- AG-X ~ [ 8] (]997 TAXES) TOTAl ~[ 2858.87] YX-X 5 [ 8] -CERTiFIED- LOCATION iNA LEE ST 2572] RES477 12/12/~997 02:09 P~ Rpl PQ Fm UT UL FCIC2] OC[NR] ]0161834168883II838338128881[ ] FOLIO [61834168883] OWNER> ESTES, BRBD=& PHYLLIS STRAP 117888 832,8885All 3384 BALBOA CIR W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORB/PI 1133]/1 561 -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 8l[8485l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ACRES I .15l NAPLES FL 34185 2784 AREA CW TRS->[50~12511111 CERT-96-UAL CERT-97-VAL LEGAL-1 N G + T C L F NO 2 11 58 25 E I 491LND 5[ 9688l [ 96881 -2 SOFT OF W 587.32FT OF LOT 32 L-USE IXP ~[ 186861 [ 118181 -3 LESS S195FT OR 1133 PG 56 HKT ~[ 2828611 28618] -4 ASD+AGADd ~l 282861 [ 286181 CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE ~1 28286] I 286181 HNSTD-X ~ I 81 HILL-CODE 188X-X ~ I 81 [ 1121 CNTY $[ 76.881HSTU $1 19.33] CIU-X $ I 81 S-SL 51 128,24] WHO ~1 11.58] UET-X ~ I 81 HILL-RATE S-L8 ~1 $3,38] ISD 91 34.671 8LD-X $ [ 8] [15,3868] CITY ~[ ,88] UADP ~[ 1.181 WID-X $ I 8] -1997- AG-X $ I 8l (1997 TAXES) TOT~:iL $I 317.181 ~H-X ~ I 81 -CERTIF~5~-- LOCATION INA FRANCIS flUE 26631 RES47? ]2/~2/~§97 02:09 P~ Rp! P~ Fm UT UL FC[~2] OC[NR] I01618342888821183833812888]! I FOLIO [61834200002] OUNER> KOGOY, MICHAEL A STRAP 117888 032.0895A11 4689 LAREIJOOD BLUO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ORB/PI 23561/[ 822] -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DALE I28][1897] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AHT I 1508001 ACRES [ ,71] NAPLES FL 34112 8888 AREA CW TRS->1581125]i11] CERT-96-UAL CERT-97-UAL LEGAL-1 N G + T C L F NO 2 11 58 25 ~ 881LND ~[ 441681 [ 44168] -2 COHN NW COR OF LOT 32, L-USE IHP ~l 89778] i 92962] -3 E587,32FT TO POB, E238FT, X~T $[ 133938] I 137122] -4 S135FT, W238FT, N135FT, IO ASD~AGADJ ~i 1339381 [ 137122] CURRENT-EX-ANT TAXABLE ~l 133938] i 137122] XXSTD-X $ I 8 NILL-COOE 188%-X ~ i 8 [ 112] C~ITY $1 510.99] NSTU ¢1 128,61] CIU-X ~ [ 8 S-SL ~[ 7~9.97] ~II'tB ~! 77.86] UET-X ~ I 8 NILL-RATE S-LB ~1 ~55.151 ISD ~! 238,651 BLD-X ~ I 8 i15,38681 CITY ~1 ,88] UA§P ~i 7.341 YID-X ~ I 8 -1997- AG-X ~ i 81 ~1997 TAXES) TOTilL ~l 2189.771 YX-X $ [ 81 -CERT!F~E~ LOCATION iNA FRANCIS AUE 26951 RES477 ~2/12/~7 02;09 P~ Rp! Po F. UT UL FCIC2] OCiNR! iD[G1834248884]iB3833812888][ ] FOLIO [61834246884] OWNER> gELLS dR, RAYMOND E STRAP 117868 832.8185All 1981 DELLA OR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ORB/Pi 23831/(2281) -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE OATE [11][8497i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 AMT [ 68888] ACRES [ .38] NAPLES FL 34117 4847 AREA TRS->[58](25][11] CERT-96-UAL CERT-9?-UAL LEGAL-! N G + T C L F NO 2 11 58 25 [ 88] LNO 5[ 18432] [ 18432] -2 COX SW COR OF LOT 32, E L-USE IXP 5[ 31169] [ 32262] -3 697.32FT TO POB, N 135FT, E XRT 8[ 49681] [ 58694] -4 96FT, S 135FT, W 96FT TO POB ASD+AGADJ 5[ 49661] [ 58694] CURRENT-EX-AXT TAXABLE 8[ 49681] i 58694] HHSTD-X ~ [ 8] HILL-CODE 188~-X 5 I 8] I 1121 CNTY 5[ 188.911XSTU ~I 47.541 CIU-X $ ( 81 S-SL ~[ 295.75] YH8 ~[ 28.49] UET-X ~ [ 81 HILL-RATE S-LB ~[ ~3t.36] ISD ~[ 85.27] BLD-X 5 I 8] [15.3868] CITY ~[ .881VADP 8! 2.71] WID-X ~ ( 8] -1997- AG-X 5 I 8] (1997 TAXES) TOTAL ~[ 779.97] WH-X ~ [ 8] -CERTIFIED- LOCATION (HA '17888] RES477 Rpl Pa Fm UT UL FC[~2] OC[NRI IO[61834288886][83D33812088][ FOLIO [618342888861 OWNER> HOGAN EST, RLBERT B STRAP 117888 832.8115All C/O ARENA S HOGAN , ~ ~ ~, , ~, ORA/P[ 4151/[ 257l 2664 FRANCIS AVE -1997 TAX ROLL- SALE DATE [ 8110971] , , , , , , , ~ AMT [ 0] ACRES [ .58] NAPLES FL 34112 4728 AREA TRS->15811251[11] CERT-96-UAL CERT-9?-UAL LEGAL-1 N G ~ T C L F NO 2 11 58 25 E [ 8]] LND $1 38728] i 387281 -2 ]68FT OF W 697.32FT OF S L-USE IMP 8[ ]35441 I ]41991 -3 135FT OF LOT 32 OR 4]5 PG 257 HRT ~i 44264] I 449]9] -4 ASO~AGAOJ 81 442~4] ! 449191 CURRENT-EX-AHT TAXABLE ~1 ]92£41 ! ]94191 ~RNST§-X ~ [ 258881 HILL-CODE 188~-X ~ [ 81 [ 1121 CNTY 81 72.371HSTU ~1 ]8.2]] CIU-X ~ [ 81 S-SL ~[ ]13.29] WNi] $! ]8.9]] UET-X 8 [ 8] HILL-RATE S-LB 81 F~.381 lSD ~1 32.67] BLD-X 8 [ 8] [15.3868] CITY $[ ,88] UADP $1 ],84] WID-X ~ [ 588] -1997- AG-X 8 [ 8] (1~7 T~XES) TOTAL $[ 298.79] WH-X ~ [ 8] -CERTIFIED- LOCATION INA FRANCES ASE 26G4] RES477 1~1~1997 02:10 PM !!111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I!11111111 TO: ~ ~ ~--AJo~o. :- ~~'~ !!i111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 FROM: ELLIE HOFFMAN ~ MINUTES & RECORDS LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX ~o: (813) 774-8408. PHONE 'NO: (813) 77z, -8406 October 21, 1998 Ms. Joyce Blazier Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 33940 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-97-031 Dear Joyce: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Monday, October 26, 1998, and again, on Monday, November 2, 1998. Kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Eltie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order No. 912501 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, ',;ill hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tam,ami Trail, Naples, Florida The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. ' The Board will consider Petition AV-97-031, Gary B~tler, P.E., as agent for the petitioner, Jose Lomeli, requesting to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the public's interest in a 60' wide road right of way shown as "Pelton Avenue" on the plat of "Burdale" as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida and being located in Section 11, To%~ship 50 South, Range 25 East. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The election of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal i[ based. BOARD OF COUNTY COM~4ISSIONER$ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBAP~A B. BERRY, CHAI~43d~ DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 17E' m October 21 1998 Mr. Gary E Butler, P.E. Butler Engineering 2223 Trade Center Way Naples, FL 34109 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-97-031 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Monday, October 26, 1998, and again on Monday, November 2, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 21, 1998 Mr. Jose Lomeli 2595 Linwood Avenue Naples, FL 34112 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-97-031 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on ~onday, October 26, 1998, and again on ~4onday, November 2, 1998. You are invited to attend tkis public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT com~ cou~'~ 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST RO. BOX 413044 CIRCUIT COURT NAPLES, FLOI~IDA 34101-3044 COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER Dwight E. Brock CLERK BOARD OF Clerk COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October 21, 1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-97-031 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Monday, October 26, 1998 and again on Monday, November 2, 1998. If you should have any questions with regard to this petition, please contact Rick Grigg at (941) 403-2462. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure pabLt~ in ~aid ColLier Co~ty, FLorida, each an~G'~er '~ AD SPACE: 92.000 INCH FILED (~q: 11/02/98 S~r'n to ~ Subscct~ ~fo~ . this ~ ~y 0 ~,~.~- :.,~., RECEIVE ' 10/20/9,1 15::~$ FAX 941543595/L COLLIER ~O COM14UNI'rY DEV ~OOt ~QU~T FOR LE~ ~RT~G OF PUBLIC HE~GS ~o: C~ to ~e Board: Pl~a~ place th~ foBo~ng a~ a: ;~ b;O~] Ic~ Ad~lti~ n~t ~ O~* ~isgla~ Adv. l~on, mc) On~g D~ Dw Co~o.D~.Sc~.~bnnin~ Pc~n ~ck ~ D~; 10-07-98 P~don No ~f .o~. ~ bfl ~ ~ip~oa)' AV 9~ I ~ PcudoaCr. ~c&~c~).l) Co~¢r's~,L~ 3~3T~T~No~ Naples,~ 34103 2) Ell~h J ~ 10~ S~kc ~ D~vc W~ N~ J~ 0?059 I ~mck J ~co, P.E.. A~oh.~r ~ Bmn~ge. lnc. 7400 T~ T~I NOeL Suite 2 ~ h~ of a~ngpro~ o~rs Heann~ ~o~ ~ BCC BZA Olh~ ~:~ ~.g ~,~: NO~MBER I0, 1998 ~ Naples D~y Ne~5 O~r X~ L~ R~ui~d Proud Text: (~hde le~ l ~np¢on & ~oa l~on & S~ze: P~ITION AV 98~16 TO VACATE A 12' ~E D~AGE [~EMENT BE~ LOTS 31 ~ 32, BLOCK B, ACCO~G TO ~ PLAT OF "COLLAR'S RESER~", AS ~CO~ED ~ PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 59 S~OUGH 87, PUBLIC ~CO~S OF COLLAR CO~. FLOR~A AND TO ACCEPT A 12' ~E D~AGE EASt ~ AS A ~PLACE~NT EASE~T D~a ~fion F~ inclu~ ad ~ing m~7 ~ Yes ~ No ~ Yes. w~ a~ shoed ~ cha~ fox ad~gco~: 101-1636 0~91~ A~ ~: Di~sion Head Dam [ Co~ A~n~mWr Dam Li~ A~ac~ents I) ~lu~on 2) Lm of ~ut~g Pro~ ~era 3) ~gM ~on of Emi Vac ~Ooa ~) Leg~ ~schpfion of R~lacmcm ~nts 5) Form DR-219 DIS~U~ON ~S~IONS ~ For bcafin~ ~fo~ BCC or B~: ~fi~g ~ to ~mpl~c o~ copy ~ ~ ,,b;~;~ ~: .~u zpp~ ~o~ ~ubmi ~ng to C~ M~a~r. Note: ~ Icg~ d~ ~ ~l~d, ~ mrc that n~es~a~ ~ ~iew or rc~cst fors~ i~ mb~d to C~ty A~O~7 ~ ~ C~t~ M~ager a~fldl file: ~ ~e~g Di~sloe ~ O~al to Ocrk'a ~e B ~ ~h~s; I~fi~ ~g Di~sion ~d ~o up~c ~d sub~t ori~nal m Cl~k's 0~. ~!nS a ~ for ~R CL~'S O~Cg 11~ O~Y: /'/'~ -SOLUTION NO. 1 7 t: · RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AV 98-016 TO VACATE A 12' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 31 AND 32, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO 'DIE PLAT OF "COLLIER'S RESERVE", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20. PAGES 59 THROUGH 87. PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND TO ACCEPT A 12' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS A REPLACEMENT EASEMENT. WHEREAS. pursuant to Section 177.101, Florida Statutes. Dominick I. Amico, Jr., P.E., as agent for thc petitioners. Collier's Reserve Ltd. and Ellzabcth J. Schlcmmcr. docs hereby request the vacation of a 12' u. ide Drainage F2scment betxveen Lots 31 and 32, Block B. according to the plat of"Coliier's Reserve", as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier Count', Florida and to acc~t a ~.VHEREAS, the Board has this da5, held a public hearing to consider v'acating said 12' wide Drainage WHEREAS. the granting of the vacation will not adversely affect the ownership or right of oonvenient BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that the 12' wide Drain*ge Easement, more particularly descfibcfl in Exhibit "B" attached here. to and inoorpor'imxt herein, is hereby accepted as the mp~ easo'nem BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that fl~e Clerk to the Board is hereby directed te n~cord a certified A'FI'EST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRy, Cha/:man EXHIBIT A 1 7F~ ILS,' sI~r I OF I AV 98-016 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AV 98-016 THIS EASEMENT, granted this 18th day of May, 199g, between ELIZABETH J. SCI"ILEMMER as GRANTOR, to the COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOCIATION,/NC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and to COLLIER COUNTy BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR/DA, its successors and assigns, as GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of 1 ,'aN ($10.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby a~lmowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRANTEE, it successors and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain stormwater drainage facilities, on the following described lands being located in Collier County, Florida. GRANTOR agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, that it will be responsible for the cost of any maintenance o£ improvements within the easement area, to wit: (See attached Exhibit 'A~ which is incorporated by reference herein) TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto said GRANTEE and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, and tauke materiais for the purpose of,2onstructing, operating, and maintaining stormwater drainage facilities thereon. GRANTOR ;'nd GRAN I'EE are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. F..~u'bh IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed the day and year £u'st above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:,~~ l,.v~- z49,/ ~-;~'~/'- cuo9 /h Whose mailing address is: Printed lqame 104 Smoke Rise Drive STATE OF ..Fl o~' ~ ~',.- Warren, NJ 07059 COUNTY OF O-o ti { o4'- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \%*'"' day of . t'Y~c~ , 1998 by ELIZABTIt J. SCHLEMMER. She is ~.ersonally known to me or produced as identification and did not take an oath. ~ ~ouo~ co.. ~:.. Printed N~i~e ~ 7F EXHIBIT B SHEET 4 OF 12 AV DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ -n- THIS EASEMENT, granted this 4th day of May, 1998, between COLLIER'S RESERVE, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, as GRANTOR, to the COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and to COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, its successors and assigns, as GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum ofTEN ($I0.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRANTEE, it successors and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain stormwater drainage facilities, on the following described lands being located in Collier County, Florida. GRANTOR agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, that it will be responsible for the cost of any and all maintenance of improvements within the easement area, to wit: (See attached Exhibit 'A" which is incorpo:~.ted by reference herein) TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto said GRANTEE and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, and take materials for the ,~u,i~,.,,~ ,.S ;onstructing, operating, and maintaining stormwater drainage facilitic~ thereon. GRANTOR and GRANTEE are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. ~V98-016 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR bas caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered COLLIER'S RESERVE, LTD., in our presence: a Florida limited partnership L By: COLLIER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Witness . a Florida corporation, its general parmer Printed Name Witness '.,3 ~c:~O~ ~ er,~C-v4oc~ Whose mailin~ address is: Print Name 3003 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER _ _~/~_~e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me th/s '~ day of ,1998 by JEFFREY M. BIRR, as Vice President of COLLIER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation, on beh~",5 of its general partner of C ' - OLLIER S RESERVE, LTD., a Florida limited partnership. He '.s personally known to me and did not take an oath. NOTOT~Ry Pi~LIC Printed Name ~ ~ ~- ~ · Prepared by: June Miller ^Ed~oll, Batter & Brundag¢, Inc. EXHIBIT B ~ ~ o~ ~7 F: ~ AV 98-016 ~ 7F'~l EXHIBIT B SHEET 8 OF 12 AV 98-016 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ 9~t 12 THIS EASEMENT, granted this 4th day of May, 1998, between COLLIER'S RESERVE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, as GRANTOR, to the COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and to COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, its successors and assigns, as GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum ofTEN ($10.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRANTEE, it suers and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain stormwater drainage facilities, on the following described lands being iocated in Collier County, Florida. GRANTOR agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, that it will be responsible for the cost of any maintenance of improvements within the easement area, to wit: (See attached Exhibit 'A' which is incorporat:~'d by reference herein) TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto said GRANTEE aad its assign ,, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, and take materials for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining stormwater drainage facilities thereon. GP ::d'77. ST. '~".d GRANTEE are used for singular or plural, as the context requires..: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered COLLIER'S RESERVE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., in our presence: a Florida not-for-profit corporation · "% ffrey M. Birr, Presidodf Pnnted N~ame fl ~ Wimess _ ~-'~Wap~, FL 34103 Printed'Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER ~/t,.The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ¢/~5~ day of ?_.~_ , I998 by JEFFREY M. BIRR, as President o£ COl. LIER'S RESERVE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, on behalf the corporation. He is personally knovm to me and did not take an oath. NOT .~Y.,PUBLIC Printed Name Agnoli, Bat'Oer & Bmnda~e, Inc. N~,Ic~, FL 34108 SHZET 11 'OF 12 AV 98-016 EXHIBIT B SHEET 12 OF 12 AV 98-OI6 (Lucludin~ ~ ~vm:) Illlillilllli llllllllllllilll!!illllllllllilllllllllillllllill] FRO~: LISA STEELE ._. ~C~L~ION: Collier County Co~z~house F/%X MO: (813) 774-8408 PMONE'NO: (813) 774-8406 Date mont: Time sont: .: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, will hold a public hearing on 'I~SI~Y, I%~2~-EMBER 10, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 AoM. The Board will consider Petition No. AV-98-016 to vacate a 12' wide drainage easement between lots 31 and 32, Block B, according to the plat of "Collier's Reserve", as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages 59 through 87, public records of Collier County, Florida and to accept a 12' wide drainage easement as a replacement easement. N(YI~: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of %~he Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) County of Collier 1 7 F '-~ ~'~ CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COWER COUNTY COUI~HOUSE NAPLES. FLOI~IDA 34101-3[~4 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT Dwight E. Brock COUNTY RECORDER Clerk CLERK BOARD OF COUN~ COMMISSIONERS October 21,1998 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AV-98-016 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998 and again on Sunday, November 1, 1998. If you should have any questions with regard to this petition, please contact Rick Grigg at 774-8494. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 'i Ocotber 20, 1998 Ms. Joyce Blazier Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 33940 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-016 Dear Joyce: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and again, on Sunday, November 1, 1998. Kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Lisa Steele Deputy Clerk Acct. #101-163610-649100 October 20, 1998 Collier's Reserve, Ltd. 3003 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-016 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and again on Sunday, November 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 20, 1998 Elizabeth J. Schlemmer 104 Smoke Rise Drive Warren, New Jersey 07059 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-016 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Co~issioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and again on Sunday, November 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure October 20, 1998 Dominick J. Amico, P.E. Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AV-98-016 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 25, 1998, and again on Sunday, November 1, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Lisa Steele, Deputy Clerk Enclosure ABU2~FING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN BLOCK B Lots 9, lO, 13, 30, S ~ 32, 3:; Collier's Reserve, Ltd. 3003 Tamiami Trail N. Naples, FL 34103 Lot31 & N ~ 32 Mrs. Elizabeth J. Schlemmer 104 Smoke Rise Drive Warren, NJ 07059 Lot 34 Dr. & Mrs. Jack Lindsey 11988 Collier's Reserve Drive Naples, FL 34II0 Lot 29 Mr. & Mrs. Jerome Bushman 164 Spring Lake Circle Naples, FL 34119 .L. ot 14 Mr. & Mrs. Martin Attrnan 12065 Collier's Reserve Drive Naples, FL 34110 Lot 11 Mr. & Mrs. McClellan 12029 Collier's Reserve Drive Naples, FL 34110 Lot 12 Empire Builders 1750 J&C Blvd., #2 Naples, FL 34109 ~-816iS.doc 17F RESOLUTION NO. 98- 462 RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AV 98-016 TO VACATE A 12' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BE'D, VEEN LOTS 31 AND 32, BLOCK B, ACCORDING TO TIlE PLAT OF "COLLIER'S RESERVE", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 59 THROUGH 87. PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND TO ACCEPT A 12' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS A REPLACEMENT EASEMENT. WHEREAS. pursuant to Scclion 177.101, Florida Statutes, Dominick J. Amico, Jr.. P.E.. as agent ~ for the pctmoners. Colbcr's Reserve Ltd and Elizal:~'th J. Schlcmmcr. does hereby request the vacation of a 12' v. ide Drainage F~CTnent b~'.'.ecn Lots 31 and 32, Block B, according to thc plat of"Collier's as recorded in Plat Book 20 Pages 59 through 87 Public Records of Collier County. Florlda and to accept a 12' v. idc Drainage Easement as a replacement ~cnt; and \¥3tEREAS. thc Board has this da;, held a public heanng to consider vacating s, id 12' 'Mdc Drainage ~ Easement, as more full', described belin,, and notice o£ said public hearing to vacate '.,.'as given as required by WItEREAS, the granting of thc vacation ','alii not ad'-'erscly affect the ovmership or right of convenient access of other property m,~crs NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, that thc following be and is hereby vacated Sec Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. BE IF I"URTIIER RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CO[,LIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that thc 12' ~sdc Drainage Easement. more particular[y described in Exhibit "B" atlacbed bercto and incorporated bercin, is hereby accept,~ as thc replacement casement for thc Drainage Easement vacated herein. BE IT FURTHER RES'OLVED. that thc Clerk to thc Board is hereby directed ,, record a certified copy of this Rcsolu on in thc Public Records of Collier Count,.' Florida, and '. ::.~ 7 '"~r notation of this vacation on thc recorded plat as referenced abe'.c. Tiqs Resolution adopted after motion, seCOnd and major/tv, vote favor/ng same. AI 1 EST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Attest aS tO Cbalrl~n'$ s ~nature onll. Appro,'edasto£ormandlcgal 2395478 OR: 2480 PG: 2032 Hcidi F. Ashton C0HI$ Il.00 SHEET I OF ~ AV 98-016 :~ 1 7F 'm i OR: 2480 ?G: 2033 DRAINAGE EASEMEN'[ n,~ ~ a' n THIS EASEMENT. granted this 18th day of May. 1998. between ELIZABETtt J. SCHI.EMMER as GRANTOR, to thc COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and to COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. its successors and assigns, as GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That thc GRANTOR. for and in consideration oftbe sum ofTEN ($10.00) DOI.LARS and other good and valuable consideration paid by thc GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and ~lls unto thc GRANTEE, it successors and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive casement, license, and privilege to entcr upon and to install and maintain stormwater drainage facilities, on the following described lands being located in Collier County, Florida. GRANTOR agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, that it will be responsible for the cost of any maintenance of improvements within the easement area, to wit: (Sec attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated by reference herein) TO HAVE AND TO ltOI,D the same unto said GIL,kNTEE and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land. excavate, and take materials for thc purpose of cot:structing, operating, and maintaining stormwater drainage facilities thereon. GRANTOR and GRANTEE are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. · OR: 2480 PG: 2034 ~ 2or 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused these i~resents to be executed the day and year first above writlen. Signed. sealed and delivered in our presence: P/tinted Name / Z,,'~,2./ I :J,r, ,~ /'~ Whose mailing address i.c Printed Name 104 Smoke Rise Drive STATE OF. ~'t o < ( ,~ .,_ Warren. NJ 07059 COUNTY OF C'.,. ~I i oc- c:~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \% v,--- day of · 1998 by ELIZABTH J. SCHLEMMER. She is .E?.~9_nally known to me or produced as identification and did n,,t take an oath. ~' l~l vt", ccx~,.um(:m ~ cc aaoa$s NOTARY PUi3~"~IC .... r. ~ co., ,<. rrinted Name~ .... I EXHIBIT B SHEET ~ OF ]2 AV 98-016 EXHIBIT B SHEET ,~ OF 12 AV 98-016 ~ ~ ~I,, DRAINAGE EASEMENT w~ ~' ~:~ THIS EASEMENT. granted this 4th day of May, 1998. between COLLIER'S RESERVE, LTD.. a Florida limited partnership, as GRANTOR, to the COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOCIATION. INC.. a Florida not-for-profit corporation and to COLLIER COLrNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COIJNTY. FLORIDA. its successors and assigns, as GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR. for and in consideration of the sum of TkN ($10.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRANTEE, it successors and a~signs a perpetual, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install o and maintain stormwater drainage facilities, on the following described lands being located in ~ co Collier County, Florida. GRANTOR agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, that it will be vo responsible for the cost of any and all maintenance of improvements ',~thin the easement area, toco~ .~. (See attached Exhibit 'A' which is incorporated ny ' - reference herein) r-_, TO HAVE AND TO ttOLD the same unto said GRANTEE and its assigns, t,~gether with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, and take materials for the purv"~ '-~',',,'~s~ructing, \ operating, and maintaining stormwater drainage facilities thereon. GP.,-tNTOR and GRANTEE are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. 17F OR: 2480 PG: 2038 AV 9~016 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above ~xitten. Signed. sealed and delivered COLLIER'S RESERVE, LTD., in our presence: a Florida limited partnership /~o,.-...<_\ L. ,4~' ...~') By: COLLIER MANAGEMENT SERVICES. INC., Witness a Florida corporation, its general partner Printed Name · y M~r Witness address Printed Name 3003 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 -- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER c:~ .~¢ foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998 by JEFFREY M. BIRR, as Vice President of COLLIER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of its gcneral partner of ,-~ COLLIER'S RESERVE, LTD., a Florida limited partnership. }le is per,,onall¥ known to me and did not take an oath. EXHIBIT B 1 7 ~ SHEET ? OF 12 AV 98-016 ~ .. :_~ ~:l~tt ~ ~'~ O ,. ~1 ' ' I.q I.· ,, --__ , ~ ~ ' ~o EXHIBIT B 1 7 F ~ SHEET ~ OF 12 AV 98-016 OR: 2480 PG: 2041 L 0R: 2481PG: 3002 DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT. granted this 4th day of May, 1998, between COLLIER'S RESERVE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, as GRANTOR, to the COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOCIATION, INC.. a Florida not-for-profit corporation and to COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. its successors and assigns, as (.;RANTEE. WITNESSETIt: That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum ofTEN ($10.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration paid by the GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the GRANTEE, it successors and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain stormwater drainage facilities, on thc following described lands being located in Collier County. Florida. GRANTOR agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, that it will be responsible for the cost of any maintenance of improvements within the easement area, to wit: (See attached Exhibit 'A' which is incorporated by reference herein) TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto said GIL. XNTEE and its assigns, :ogether with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, and take materials for the purpose of con tmeting, operating, and maintaining stormwater drainage facilities thereon. GRANTOR and GRANTEE are used for singular or plural, ms the context requires. ' OR: 2480 PG: 2042 Sbe~ 10~' 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered COLLIER'S RESERVE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., in our presence: a Florida not-for-profit corporation Wimcss -,_ ~ ~~ ~ ~,--,x o~.. '%t Jeffrey M. Birr, Pr , Pfintedl~ame / (~ i t' Who~ mailing address is: Witness ~'~-Naples, FL 34103 Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I~' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ ~.~ , 1998 by JEFFREY M. BIRR, as President of COLI, IER S RESERVE COUNTRY CLUB. INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, on betudt'the~ corporation. He is personally known to me and did not take an oath. co Printed Name ^f, no~i, 13a~m:r & Brundq~. Inc. ~ 17F EXHIBIT B SHEET 11 OF 12 AV 98-016 17F EXHIBIT B SHEET 12 OF 12 AV 98-016 C~TIFICATE OF AUT~{ENTICITY FOR CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records of the Clerk of Circuit Court, Collier County, Naples,Florida. That the records were microfilmed on the date or during the period indicatea; and that at the time of microfilming th'~ records were in the custody of the Clerk of Circuit Court. It is further certified that the records microfilmed on this reel were microfilmed under the authority of the Clerk of Circuit Court: and that in order to insure archival quality, authentic reproduction, and legal admissibility of records filmed they were microfilmed with equipment and film approved by the Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services - Records Management and that the guidelines set forth by the Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services - Records Management were adhered to. t rofllm Ca__ear CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY REGARDING CONTENT OF INFORMATION ON FII3~ This to certify that the microphotographs appearing on thi~ film; start with CASE N~4BER and end with CASE N~4BER Microfilm Camera Operator Date - Month/Day/Year