Backup 06/26/1991 R Parks & Recreation
Advisory Board
(PARAB )
Backup
June 26 , 1991
COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
AGENDA
June 26, 1991
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting will be held Wednesday, June
26, 1991, 1:30 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Park in the Administrative
Office located at 3300 Santa Barabara Boulevard.
1:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER:
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG:
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
IV. REQUESTS FOR DISCUSSION - SPECIFIC UPDATE ITEMS:
1:45 p.m. A. Vanderbilt Beach Property
V. NEW BUSINESS/PRESENTATIONS:
2:00 p.m. . A. Y.M.C.A. Contract
2:15 p.m. B. Beach Ordinances
2:30 p.m. C. Vending Machine Bids
2:45 p.m. D. Conklin Point Engineering Contract
3:00 p.m. E. Budget Update
3:15 p.m. F. COOL Concession, Inc.
3:30 p.m. G. CSOA Contract
3:35 p.m. VI. REPORTS/UPDATES:
A. Bonita Beach Park
B. Recycling
C. Tigertail Vegetation
D. Immokalee Airport Park Bathrooms
E. 951 Boat Ramp Parking
F. Pools
G. Vanderbilt Beach Accesses and Parking
H. Community Centers
I. Football/Soccer Field Immokalee
J. Frank E. Mackle Jr. Building Expansion
K. Conklin Point Boat Ramp
L. Listing of Donated Property
M. Immokalee Child Care Center
N. Clam Pass Park
3:45 p.m. VII. NEW BUSINESS:
4:00 p.m. VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
MS:rtd:003538
r - ,
G
, •
Cfi CD
n E -if
f
z 1i
i- ct
m
r.
--
I .+
JD
111
cc
iJ
Ii)
c-1_
0 rD 0:1
-5 J
Ali
jli
T"} r o 5 D
v .f
F-. c,
['i
1 £ -i
1 i
'y1
!Ti CD
--.T' I �`�
r..a f !
.-4- 4
1.ir
0 t-'
N.3
R, ..
W
0
•
m±rwDw
w: * o maCO
/BCD% // / •
•
}
• a
. . . . . � . • j
( 5 .
\ D e w n /
77,CO m D m D -
- (_n a
occwa n
} / = m. o
7.3 a =
co —
} - -3
m s .
1-'•
} � �
S
1 S
am m
} 'e -0
) }
� \
COLLIER COUNly
0 TARICS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
7S. PCORIOx .`-
RECOP FA x 9Qq? vf
TO: C. o\\' CoLNA\iy l'►1"�1
•
ATTENTION : C-\'\.evr k �oma5
y
FROM : Pc\Ncr, T, o,u S - e_c x- e-Ao,r`I --L or4 I
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: ) O
MESSAGE: ti ova G,Ate.�do,hce, ',s ne.ceSScxry
\t, cr-dew -4c 0 `NQ N1 e, Q, v,c r v.m �'o'V-
—1\ncx hk yo ul rt \So W w.\\
J
\
If you have any questions, please call (813) 353-0404, or Fax (813) 353-1002
3300 Santa Barbara Blvd., Naples, Florida 33999
4
CBUDGET WORKSHOP SCHEDULE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS
Friday, June 28th 2:15-3:45 - Public Services
4:1)
ADDENDA
• .
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 91
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN OF
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE YMCA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, INC. , NAPLES, FLORIDA
FOR THE JOINT USE OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
AND THE OFFERING OF RECREATION PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to enter
into an Agreement with the YMCA of Collier County, Inc. , Florida,
for the joint use of recreational facilities in order to provide
recreation activities, events and programs to the Collier County
public;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The Board hereby approves and authorizes the
Chairman to execute an Agreement with the YMCA of
Collier County, Inc. , Naples, Florida, for the joint
use of recreational facilities for the purpose of
offering non-competing activities, events and/or
programs with those offered by the Parks and
Recreation Department to the Collier County public,
a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
2. This Resolution shall take effect September 1, 1991
and shall remain in effect for a one (1) year trial
basis at Veterans Park, 1900 Immokalee Road, Naples,
Florida.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority
favoring the same.
DATE: 1991
ATTEST:
JAMES C. GILES, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Deputy Clerk BY
Patricia Anne Goodnight,
Chairperson
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
County Attorney
DRAFT
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
, 1991, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of . Collier
County, hereinafter (County) and the YMCA of Collier County, Inc.
hereinafter (YMCA) . This Agreement will be in effect at Veterans
Park, 1900 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida, for a trial period of
one (1) year beginning September 1, 1991.
June 1, 1992 both parties will negotiate continuation of this
Agreement. Additions, changes or deletions will be discussed at
that time. This Agreement shall be presented for ratification to
the Board of County Commissioners.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County is charged by law with the provision of
public parks, playgrounds and recreation areas; and
WHEREAS, the YMCA has made no direct contribution for the
purchases of land nor the facilities installed by the County; and
• WHEREAS, the County has made no direct contribution for the
purchases of land nor the facilities installed by the YMCA; and
WHEREAS, both parties recognize their respective
responsibilities to the general public; and
WHEREAS, the County and the YMCA are mutually interested in
community activities, events, and/or recreational programs; and
WHEREAS, the County and YMCA wish to enter into an Agreement
with each other to provide activities, events and/or programs, and
do any and all things necessary or convenient to aid and cooperate
in the cultivation of citizenship by providing adequate activities,
events and/or programs; and
WHEREAS, in the interest of providing activities, events and
programs with the least possible expenditure of public funds.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the County
and the YMCA do hereby agree and resolve as follows:
1. The County will make available to the YMCA for activities,
events and/or programs Veteran Park area and facilities
which are suitable and available for said activities,
events and/or programs.
2 . Except as otherwise provided herein, the YMCA will make
available to the County for community activities, events
and/or programs all YMCA areas and facilities which are
suitable and available for community activities, events
and/or programs.
3 . In the scheduling of activities, events and/or programs,
the YMCA shall have priority for use of the YMCA facility,
the School Board shall have second priority and the County
shall have third priority, and County activities shall have
first priority for use of County facilities, the School
Board of Collier County, Florida shall have second priority
and the YMCA shall have third priority.
4. It is hereby agreed that a schedule of dates for specific
activities, events and/or programs shall be worked out in
advance by both the County and YMCA so as to avoid
conflicts. This schedule must be agreed upon no later than
sixty (60) days prior to the beginning of each four (4)
month session. Activities, events and/or programs offered
by the YMCA at the Veterans Park shall not directly compete
with the events, activities and/or programs being scheduled
at any County Parks and Recreation facility in the greater
Naples area.
5. The YMCA agrees to provide adequate personnel, as
determined by the County, to supervise YMCA activities,
events and/or programs which take place at Veterans Park.
6. The County, through its Parks and Recreation Department,
agrees to provide adequate personnel, as determined by the
YMCA, to supervise County activities which may take place
at the YMCA areas and facilities.
7. The contact person for the YMCA shall be the Community
Program Director or Designee and the contact person for the
County shall be the Parks and Recreation Director or
Designee. Scheduling requests shall be submitted in
writing to the above-mentioned contact person.
8 . It is agreed that the YMCA may make capital improvements
and install additional equipment to improve existing
facilities not in conflict with County use, subject to
written approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
Capital improvements for said purposes shall be made at the
YMCA expense and shall become the property of the County
upon termination of this Agreement.
9 . It is agreed that shall either party wish to install
temporary improvements on site, written permission will be
obtained prior to installing said improvements.
10. Any unusual direct costs, to ,include but not limited to
lights, field lining and maintenance incurred by the County
because of additional YMCA programming, shall be paid by
the YMCA.
11. Any unusual direct costs incurred by the YMCA because of
additional County programming at YMCA facilities shall be
paid by the County.
12 . In the event of a dispute between the YMCA and the County,
the County Manager or designee shall make the final
decision with reference to County facilities. In the event
of a dispute between the YMCA and the County, the YMCA
General Director shall make the final decision with
reference to YMCA facilities.
13 . Any licensing stipulations and/or associated fee for
specific activities, events and/or programs shall be paid
by the organization sponsoring said activity. Record
keeping and the burden of proof of certification shall be
the responsibility of the agency sponsoring the said
activities, events and/or programs.
14. The establishment of fees and charges for activities,
_events and/or programs shall be the responsibility of the
Organization sponsoring said activity, event or program.
The fees and charges shall be reviewed and agreed upon by
the County and YMCA prior to publication.
4 lk 15. It is stipulated by the parties that each shall have the
rights, liabilities, and duties as provided by law. The
YMCA and Collier County shall each maintain general
liability insurance in the minimum amount of one million
dollars ($1, 000, 000. 00) per occurrence. Each shall name the
other as additional insured. Each party shall maintain
workers compensation coverage in accordance with Florida
Statute requirements. A Certificate of Insurance shall be
presented by the County and the YMCA to each other prior to
the commencement of this Agreement. Should the Certificate
of Insurance expire within the time limit of this
Agreement, it is agreed that a current Certificate of
Insurance shall be furnished.
16. Should either party wish to terminate this Agreement for
any reason, written intent should be submitted sixty (60)
days prior to the date the party wishes to terminate the
Agreement. Intent to terminate shall be submitted to the
above mentioned Agency contact person.
17. Should either party that has installed temporary
improvements on a site terminate this Agreement, the party
shall remove all installed facilities within forty-five
(45) days after the termination. This provision may be
waived by mutual agreement by both parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and pursuant to ;the authority granted by
duly adopted Resolutions, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JAMES C. GILES, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By By
Deputy Clerk Patricia Anne Goodnight,
Chairperson
(SEAL)
YMCA of COLLIER COUNTY
By
Witness Gile E. Sievers,
General Director
Witness
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
County Attorney
5515
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DIRECT
STAFF TO AMEND ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO BEACH ACTIVITIES IN COLLIER
COUNTY
Objective: To provide consistency among the existing County
ordinances which regulate beach activities in Collier County.
4 Considerations: The County Commission currently has three
ordinances and one State permit requirement which regulate
activities on the beach. These ordinances are the Vehicle on the
Beach Ordinance No. 79-46, the C.C.S.L. Ordinance No.
82-88/80-19/75-19 ; and the Vendor on the Beach Ordinance No.
89-11/89-86. The above mentioned State permit requirement
relates to the Marco Island Beach Renourishment DNR Permit which
prohibits the construction of structures seaward of the previous
mean high water line.
There is currently a conflict between the Vehicle on the Beach
and the Vendor on the Beach Ordinances. The Vendor Ordinance
provides for certain vendors to be permitted for the operation of
vessel rentals, etc. However, the Vehicle on the Beach Ordinance
restricts any vehicular activities seaward of the dune line
(exceptions are law enforcement, EMS, Environmental,
Maintenance) . Therefore, recreational operations are permitted
but support vehicles for said operations are not.
Another issue is that non-recreational vendors desire to provide
food, beverage, towel and lotion type sales. There is currently
no specific permit for these types of vendors. They are
prohibited under current Ordinance from using any type of vehicle
or having any type of structure without having a C.C.S.L.
variance. Both "structures" and "vehicles" are not well defined.
Some options to address these issues are as follows:
1. Continue to permit active recreational vendors (vessel
rentals, etc. ) on beach property. This option would require
permits for vehicles on the beach, vendors on the beach, an
occupational license, and a C.C.S.L. variance for structures.
Revisions to the Vehicle on the Beach Ordinance would be
necessary in order to allow this type use, or
2 . Allow this type of use at beaches fronting hotels and
certain commercial properties (timeshares) , and on beaches
fronting County parks. This option would require an amendment to
the Vendors on the Beach Ordinance, or
3 . Limit this type of use only in beach parks currently
designated as such. (Tigertail Beach and Clam Pass County
parks) .
4 . Prohibit this type of activity altogether on beaches
throughout Collier County.
In regards to the non-recreational vendor (food, beverage, etc. , )
1. To amend the Vendor on the Beach and Vehicle on the Beach
Ordinances to include permitting and standards for this type of
activity or
2 . Limit this type of activity to beaches fronting hotels,
etc. , and on beaches fronting County parks. This option would
require an amendment to the Vendors on the Beach Ordinance, or
3 . Limit this type of activity to beach parks currently
designated as such. (Tigertail Beach and Clam Pass County
parks) .
4. Prohibit this type of activity altogether on beaches
throughout Collier County.
This is one of three key beach policy-related issues. The others
relate to parking fees and beach parking agreement with the City
of Naples. These will be brought to the Commission as part of
the FY91/92 budget.
Fiscal Impact: None for this particular request. Should the
Board direct certain ordinance amendments, the fiscal impacts in
terms of permitting and enforcement will be outlined at that
time.
Growth Management: None
Recommendations: That the Board of County Commissioners direct
County staff to amend ordinances accordingly.
Prepared by Date
Murdo Smith, Acting Parks, and Recreation Director
Reviewed by Date
Heyward E. Boyce, Compliance Services Manager
•
Reviewed by Date
Tom 011iff, Assistant to the County Manager
5571
3
DRAFT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE BID
#91-1713 VENDING MACHINES
Objective: Recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that
Bid #91-1713 for Vending Machines at public parks be awarded to
Naples Vending for vending machines and to Faramo Amusements,
Inc. for video machines.
Considerations: Sealed bids for Bid #91-1713 Vending Machines
were opened May 29, 1991. The posting date was May 9, 1991.
Invitations to Bid were submitted to seven vendors. Two bids
were received and a bid tabulation is attached for your review.
The bids were rated on percentage remitted to the County,
product dispensers and price, maintenance and operational
program, quality of equipment and experience and professional
reputation of proposers.
Of the two bids received, one vendor, Naples Vending, bid on
vending machines, and showed a financial return of 25% to the
County. Faramo Amusements, Inc. bid on the video games and
showed a financial return of 50%. These machines will be located
at various parks throughout the County.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed this Bid at
their June 26, 1991 meeting and recommend approval by a <> to <>
vote.
Fiscal Impact: Additional revenue from vending machines is
undetermined at this time.
Growth Management: None
Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners award Bid
#91-1713 to Naples Vending for vending machines and to Faramo
Amusements, Inc. for video games.
Prepared by Date
Murdo Smith, Acting Parks and Recreation Director
Reviewed by Date
Steve Carnell, Purchasing Director
Reviewed by Date
Martha Skinner, Acting Public Services Administrator
5605
•
-4- + f s f 1
+ + ;
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board of Collier County Commissioners
approve the contract negotiated with Gee and Jensen,
Engineers-Architects-Planners, Inc. for professional services for
Conklin Point Boat Launch Facility.
OBJECTIVE: To award an Agreement for Professional Services for
the detailed design of the Conklin Point Boat Launch facility.
CONSIDERATIONS: A Master Plan for the Conklin Point facility was
completed using professional services provided under the annual
contract.
Using Section VIII B-3 of the County Purchasing Policy, the firm
Gee and Jensen, Engineers-Architects-Planners, Inc. was ranked
first for negotiation. An Agreement for Professional Services to
design and provide services through construction of the facility
in accordance with the Master Plan has been negotiated with the
consultant and is recommended for Board approval.
FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditures for this agreement are estimated at
$82,000. 00. Funds for this project estimated at $937, 000 are
available in Fund 306, Cost Center 156311.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This action is in accordance with the
Growth Management Plan for parks and recreational facilities.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Collier County Commissioners
approve the agreement with Gee and Jensen,
Engineers-Architects-Planners, Inc. for professional services for
Collier County Conklin Point Boat Launch Facility and authorize
the Chairman to execute the agreement on behalf of the Board.
PREPARED BY: La, Al- - DATE: 42///2/9/
Thomas A. Donegan, Engi ' ering Projects Manager
0 fice of Capital Projects Management
REVIEWED BY: ,. ��E DATE: 6 ' '(
T omas E. Conrecode, Director
Office of Capital Projects Management
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
Thomas W. 011iff
Assistant to the County Manager
TAD/sc/3586
Nam AT�
111 JUN 25 91
Pg.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RE
IMPROVEMENTS COMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AUTHORIZE CCUST'RIICTIO N
RELATING TO THE TIGER TAIL FOOD & BEVERAGE QNCESSION AREA
Objective: To obtain Board approval for the construction of a screen enclosed
deck adjacent to the Tigertail food and beverage concession area located on
Marco Island and authorize Cool Concession, Inc. to act as agent for Collier
County when applying for the necessary permits.
Considerations: Cool Concession, Inc., which has entered into an agreement
with Collier County to operate the Tigertail food and beverage concession
area, wishes to improve the existing area by constructing a screen enclosed
deck adjacent to the existing concession stand (attachment A) . The said
improvements will be at no cost to the County and will be funded by Cool
Concession, Inc. entirely. It is also understood that since the construction
area is seaward of the Coastal Control Line they are required to apply for all
necessary state and local permits relating to the construction project. Being
an improvement to benefit Collier County, Cool Concession, Inc. is requesting
to act as Collier County's agent for the purpose of applying for all above
mentioned permits.
Fiscal Impact: None, all financial obligations to be funded by Cool
Concession, Inc.
Growth Management: None
Recce iendation: Staff is recommending that the Board of County Commissioners
authorize the construction of a wood decking system adjacent to the Tigertail
food and beverage concession area, and act as an agent for Collier County when
applying for the 'ts,
Prepared by ��....— Date 6-%74,,--*
•• , Parks Superintendent
Reviewed by /// �, ,, T `�L /
' Date
Murdo Smith, Acting parks and Recreation Director
Reviewed by Date
Martha Skinner, Acting Public Services Administrator
5450
: 4
(;) 7: .- — .
I t!l
.ii 1 1:11L:_(„.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 18, 1991
TO: Murdo Smith, Acting Parks and Recreation Director
Parks and Recreation Department
FROM: Sandra I. Taylor, Direct•
Real Property Manageme. �'-p_ - 1 -nt
SUBJECT: Letter of Opinion- Proposed Vanderbilt Beach Parking
Pursuant to your request, please find attached a Letter of Opinion,
prepared by the County's Review Appraiser, on the above referenced
site.
Please feel free to contact me should you require further
information.
•
irbor
1
__
, E
0:: . 7 RECEIVED
JUNO 3 1991
•
MEMORANDUM REAL PROPERTY MGMT.
TO: Sandra Taylor, Real Property Director
FROM: Murdo Smith, Acting Parks and Recreation Director `
DATE: May 31, 1991
RE: Property on Vanderbilt Beach Road
Please find attached an aerial map showing the location of a
vacant lot on Vanderbilt Beach Road.
Could you supply our Department with the value of the property,
acreage, and the name of the owner?
Thanks for your assistance. -
MS/bj/5489
Attachments
cc: Martha Skinner, Acting Public Services Administrator
1.
4
•
MEMORANDUM
`i■r DATE: June 18, 1991
TO: Sandra Taylor, Director
Real Property Management Department
FROM: J. Tyler Loehnert, Review Appraiser
Real Property Management Departmen
RE: Opinion of Value, Block C, Lots 1 - 18, Vanderbilt Beach Center
(File 91. 040 )
Pursuant to your request for a statement of value opinion, I have made
sufficient study and analysis to reach a preliminary opinion of value for
the above mentioned tract of land. This parcel is located in the
northwesterly portion of Collier County. More specifically, the tract is
located along the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road between Gulf Shore
Court and Commerce Street, south of Center Street. The following is a
brief summary of the more significant characteristics of the parcel:
SIZE: 1.1852 acres ( 51,627 .1166 sf ) (see addenda)
ZONING: C-3. This zoning allows for intermediate commercial uses. The
zoning is not consistent with the current zoning re-evaluation ordinance
and is subject to change. There is an application for compatibility
exception currently pending. The Growth Planning Office has indicated that
the property has a good chance retaining the current zoning status.
LAND USE: Urban Residential- This designation allows for a variety of
residentially oriented uses. The zoning is
not consistent with this land use element as
previously discussed.
OWNERSHIP: Lamar Gable, Trustee
2600 Golden Gate Pkwy, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 33942
After research into the market area, indications are that the most
appropriate unit value applicable would be the square foot unit valuation.
Discussions have been held with various local appraisers as to the value of
similar lands in this general area. Based upon those conversations, and
.upon research into the market, it is my opinion that $29.00 to $30 . 00 per
square foot would be representative of the unit price applicable to these
lands. This estimate considers the site to be in its current state and
that it is unlikely that a change in the zoning could occur. Therefore,
the total estimated fair market value of the 51,627 .1166 square feet would
be as follows (rounded) :
$1, 500,000 (@ $29 . 00/SF) to $1,550 ,000 (@ $30 .00/SF)
If you need additional information, please advise.
I
S
•
17 888 WI GINS PA RD IiGCECF+HEP' .Egssoig.- -.;SS;; 4.4sv
a - :�Gx .CAR188EAN �:••,;� - .1
xlcciNS$ g PARK 15 ` n111�,.���y - 1
7 .- SAY • a W W ROY SI DOVE Ft' a O, __
Yr- . 7 Z i
Pscot! p• 0" ¢ ,.•r •��f
OURS[ in PAN AM AV v MI 'C.:4�
y� .y.
° u • -:• �1 .ate--
I'3 GLEN GALE AV • -U r-. -. '
GULF �- J
ANCHORAGE P NAR80R
•A
River':
j1/41'
5 00
-...Z.;
;•1: � : '�
r ' yr �1 W
t'Y+' i Vf L•
8 G�'ii F 21 alLK;R-BIL. �tL
m 22 R o ;r�
•
__._� 2 g
W ~ro, E.. -'p�.
o
z f
a
(WA
tT ;V:' ; v.rt(S r•. oan•CO(uf._ j BLUEBilt. . [ T •It.rauL
-- �.�. .. . • .�lRR••
V:4" FLAMINGO AV -1MM.�1'- • \ /
N •.N AV _MEM
EGRET AV Av
r AV
VA 3111111EINMENWPIEL"..4
la v."41Crbilt 81, .1211111111111MPAINIMINI
9 a AANNE O AV �
m �l�E INELla�.• 27
A
P.•• � •-AN AV m ,��- r
Q eA IOE .������- ~�
VANDE-BfLT. r ;•
«' BEACHP J=�m���1/�
RITZ- ���
CARLTON BEACRWALIC
IMF r.v p
• 10 32 °" r .A
L-o• r,u•••••. 34
..5..........a. 111‘
•
S
tin(Um
OP" _
AN
PINE C,pi
cn
m - C.
I� 02 0 - a A N ys o till
s v la �..• 0 v�
1 i ..I. w C re‘ 7
7 Ma
•
•
•
•
I
r
•
_ _ I
a
A' 15 , 16 16 • I9 20,#•21 22 .23 24 . 23 27 '28 29 x 30 31 72 33• 34 : 35. ••• Curl! , . ,
• Q , a 1
•
COMMERCE STREET o
',IL. - 0., - _ - _
1 0; a O, O I1 ' t tS , ;��II g,1 ' y • ' • • • ■ ,
I • 2 3 a 4 5 , i 7 ' 6 , 9 , * I t • 1 2 ' 1 3 • N` 15 : t6 ' R` 18 • t9 • 60
Pe.et. ' w. . _ 1 ),. ' •
CFI%.1' 4.
to g r k i : • . : , t 2 .
_ •3B 37 3-6 35 34 ' I • I ' t 1
37 33 32 3 1 , 30' 29,20' 2 26, 25' 24. 23 22 a•
. Si° .4® ®® 34 a n 3I • ' ' • , 2t 2O '
..... , 1 . ' I $ 1 ® 21
C)
o CENTER
7:3 014 6
STREET
j
• • I 2 3 0101.-1011{
i - O O O 1
4 !6
' 1 Li- e - ® '6 it
• r•Roan
jSj62
4 IOW.
a. - j ti A• ','-i fs _---
�.w Wit. .J ` ; •� ,',ray ,
7:73:441-54.7:;:.r.11%.."1 "7�.„.•J -i•{_C-' `. 4'- - ' 'C! ---L. ,.•-
-,"- - t _ • _ ►-��e _ r:"4"....-4•• ••••4•'......:45."- •` ja.r, "fS71y`• • �• V-f j ��s -. .s• ��r•'- ,...r ,_ y+. �` •••��:_ s T.tv<t+�,
•,- • r •
-
s :} � Y••y.yas•�, ,�• c�• may;•:.. -..... ,4:0,._ c•---t•••• --•":4".1..-•`"-F•-• .---^.--•:.-- **-
4...• - ,• . .i. ,...:4,. - .. .„....z,_.4.........,...11.4.7„..,1.41 . . .. •r-�-:: : . k .t•-•l- - ±C `R } "" , . ate- . 7. .
r- -•� 1,•-• 1•;. ••• .. -i�►t3R .... .✓ .4 {_r•
'•„�.y�� - ^~ _ ' -• -:%,"1:1•4"-%:•!-",*fie • ,.�{�....--' °�r��Tita •.• " .--•
..,..4-,:a.,,, S" _ �t i•;•.[ -,.y. � fi MPi= •-yam , � f r'
•_ - _ _ -•�,� -F . _ - ,_•• ••.SS.. .. 7 �-.�..s: • •� ��r`• • .. /"
n+ _ •'ice ` � -l - i .r „� -'�_ __•; . ` .s . .
- - '� N' s j - rt -may rf - :�'O►•
' �''- I mo! �`" �. :_ 1i . _
6,. i;? - • • 11 X116_ � ,, - ` - -. ; •.
is • _1 ... 3
- .--:Ti.4s.,- ''',•.,*-----:,/;,%,-/..,'C,d-r A- . . _ .
.,-. - ,,t . ` � .•yr
a c •.-.• •:;•••..'..*,*.... f.i. '- • - .
• .....--;7‘. lt• r •- - /di
• =•• Cssv _ i '
...... .,: s. 11.±.-- -74:11'..---L:; Mg+-4 Q1.-`• .• t> s
wt y j .tra• q ir• r
- �1._ I.• • . -•.-- • - tom` -4-_ -• _ �. +i•
-.� .� _ _� • '. =�i may, ...
., ........... . .. ii, :.•i •mot./L�•w _Y.: 'i 1: � s a!` �"� .wry`
• % j -x. -: , - .•
w r,— < `-
, 1,...7‘ .e........x•
s
•
• A
e
M -C
.a W
7 t 1 d�
A —o U7
7
I
0 0 •
1.
•
s
0
Q
I
a 2.5.E
Pt--->Pt BEARINGS DISTANCE SLOPE NORTH EAST
1 2 N 6 04'30.0"W 125 .7000 0 00 ', 0.0" 486.8362 1248 .4077
Pt--->Pt BEARINGS DISTANCE SLOPE NORTH EAST
2 3 N 84 40'40.0"W 125. 7000 0 00 ' 0.0" 498 .4957 1123 . 2496
Pt--->Pt BEARINGS DISTANCE SLOPE NORTH EAST
2 3 N 84 40 '40.0"W 493 . 6500 0 00 ' 0.0" 532 .6256 756 .8859
Pt--->Pt BEARINGS DISTANCE SLOPE NORTH EAST
3 4 S 8 23 '20.0"E 89 . 3900 0 00 ' 0. 0" 444. 1920 769. 9271
Pt--->Pt BEARINGS DISTANCE SLOPE NORTH EAST
4 5 S 80 29 '30.0"E 498 . 5900 0 00 ' 0.0" 361.8294 1261 .6673
1->5->4->3->2 #TOTAL AREA =__= 51627. 1166 sq ft.
OR 1. 19 acre.
Traverse Accuracy =_= North : 0.0127 ft, East : 0.0433 ft.
Distance Error : 1 ft in 26779.46 feet. Angular Error : 0 00 '28.7"
Total Area =_= 51627. 1166 sq ft, or 1. 1852 acre.
4
FC O C'C T R Z D T' 1 i 1 o=.s;Nr}TI 7I i'4
• FOLIO 79121600006 044i<'EPI GABLE TP ET ALT LA?4'RP
STRAP 151'400 C 13A32 26.N► GOLDEN GATE PKWY S TE -0H'► vrti,u-.r.,. -...r-{-
PG 5226 ITM 9 TAY POLL FOP.MY=r
SALE DATE .► :652
'S AMT 0
ACRES . 11 MAPLES FL 33942 324.P Ac
LEC-AL-1 .'AMOEP.DIILT BCH-4 CENTER ELK C 10 LAI-xes 31425 P'R•ELIMIf:i=•s'='
LOT 1 OP 970 PG 459 S OR 975 USE-CD IMP* <i ASSESSED
-3 PG 674.0R 1282 PG "{O TOTL'b 814: 5 4:ALt3ES
-4 TAKABLE's 81425 -1'391 -
HM•BTD-!: 's 0 MILL--CC?BE
100-(-K s
Er 104 C7dT`f 'Y. 315.24 MSTU 's 7
C I -Y * r)
S--3L 's 411. 77 4tM8 •s 2'4. 10
-
•E s
{J T Y S 0 MILL-PATE S-LB 's 180-99 ISD 's 1.>2, 33
BLD-Y •s 0 v.- 15. 1547 CITY s .00 '• ADP 's 12.07
WID-Y •s 0 -19'0-
A*3-Y .5 0 *AP P•RO K I MATE --. 199-:*- -:r TA.K ES C-- TOTAL •s 1091. 31
Wt-+-Y -s 0
STREET-LOC Y-fP 151'-400 PE_477
FC 02 OC 3•{R ID 7612164000 3 75121600006
FOLIO 75.14.4:e0s.r;=a O4*ER3• GABLE TP ET AL. L;•kKAP
STRAP 151'400 C 23A32 2600 CsOLDEM GATE PFCWY STE 200
PG 5226 ITM 10 TAX' ROLL FORMAT
SALE DATE 0 0652
rr{!-.F.�vr.r r.
S AMT 0
ACRES .06 mAP LES FL 33x42 32 06 Ac
LEeAL-1 VANDERBILT BC- CENTER BL-C C 10 Lr-MDs 46450 PPELIMI?•APY
-2 LOT 2 OR 970 PG 453 S OR 975 USE-CD IMP* ,t ASSESSED
-3 PG 474.OR lasa pe 70 TOTL's 46450 VALUES
-4 T AYPsBLE"s 46450 -1. 1-
HMSTD-Y S 0 MILL-CODE
-% -5 0 144 C?. sT Y S 152. 16 MSTU V 20-. 4 00
CIS:-Y '6i 0 S-SL S 234.37 WMB 5 16.61
{:ET-X -5 0 MILL-RATE S-LB S 103.25 ISO S 58. 43
BLD-X -s 0 yr 1.:s. 1538 CITY 's .00 VADP S 6. 55
W I D-Y• •s :► -1990-
540-X .5 r.r v.-APPROXIMATE --t• 1990 TAKES C-- TOTAL 's 622. 74
4:H-Y s wZ
STREET-LOC MA 1 5 15:-F i PE5477
:': FC 02 EtC MR ID 731 i 16 eo:tort.► 731.16CKor N e[
FOLIO 73121680000 O44UER,' CABLE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRAP 151'900 C 33A32 2600 OOLDE;4 GATE PMWY STE 200 rr-.i.+r.v-r w -v-*-
P O 3226 /TM 1 1 TAX ROLL FORMA
SALE DATE 0 C'682 v-0,r.
5 AMT 0
ACRES .06 NAPLES FL 3314a_ saos AC
LEGAL-1 VAf4DERB ILT E<CH CENTER EQJe. C 10 LAf4D'S 47575 PRELIMIt4AP'
— LOT 3 OR 370 PO 453 S OR 375 L+SE-CD IM 5 04 ASSESSED
-3 PG 6741OR 1842 PO 70 TOTLS 475,75 *:ALL4E-
-4 TAXASLES 4757. -1'74.91-
HMSTD-.Y. 5 0 MILL-COLE
100%-X -5 0 164 Cf4TY •5 146.C.:p MSTU 5 2 . L 6
Ci+:-X 'S 0
:'E T-X '5 0 MILL-RATE S-LB 5 105. 74 ISD a .2.1 _ 82
LGLD-X -5 0 r- 15. 1886 CITY '5 .00 IA'DP a 7.04
WILt-.Y. 'S 0 -1?_o-
A0-X •5 0 4-APPROXIMATE --3• 1550 TAXES !-- TOTAL '5 637.54
WH-X 'S 0
STREET-LOC MA 151300 RE34T7
FC 02 OC MP ID 7'412172000 7'4121600006
FOLIO 75121 Tit':to3 ONf4ER4 GABLE TR ET AL1 LAMAR
C STRAP 151300 C 43A32 2800 GOLDEN GATE AS!4!`! STE 200 +►+! +�v ti wr.
PG 52 6 ITM 12 TAX ROLL FORMAT
SALE DATE 0 0643 r-r-4.- v-,0-,t-v-.
5 AMT 0
ACRES .05 MAPLES FL 33942 32`.ti AC
LEGAL-1 VANDERBILT BCH CEHTEP BLf! C 10 LAC5 40500 ARELIMIMAR'r'
I -2 LOT 4 OR 570 PG 4C3 S OR 376 USE-CD IM -5 0 r ASSESSED
-3 PG 6741 OP 123 PG 70 TOTL.5 40 00 VALUES
-4 TAXADLE5 40500 -1391 -
HMSTD-X 'S 0 MILL-CODE
100,4-X s 0 164 CUTV •s 158.84 MSTU .5 17. 7'3
CIS:-X Si 0 S-SL 'S 2:14.48 WMG '5 14. 44
VET-X s 0 MILL-RATE S-LB '5 90.05 ISO '5 =10.?ti
SLD-X. '5 0 r- 1 . 1833 CITY '5 .00 +;ADP '5 6.00
WID-X •5 :r -1 -r0-
Ai-X .5 0 44APPPDXIMATE --t• 1930 TAXES !-- TOTAL '5 _SE-
WH-X '5 0
STREET-LOG: MA 1f1' :K:t PE5477
FC file OC MR ID 7'.-;f121760001 79121600':,.:,s
FOLIO 79121 76< )1 OVtt4ER • CABLE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRAP 151900 C �3A3 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY STE 200 wv-v-v-*.v-�,v-Y-
PG 3226 ITM 13 TAX ROLL FORMr=
SALE DATE 0 06a`
•S AMT 0
ACRES .06 MAPLES FL 3-942 32:F6 pc
LEGAL-1 +:ANDERBILT E<CH CENTER SLf-: C 10 LAND'S 4127z PRELIMINAF
- LOT S OR 970 PG 459 & OR 975 USE-CD IMP'S 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 674.OR laaa PG 70 TOTLS 41275 VALUES
-4 TAXABLE'S 41275 -1,4,=f1 .-
HMS T D-Y• 6 0 MILL-CODE
100%-X •p 0 164 Cf4TY 'S 161.64 MSTU 6 16. 12
CI4:-X 5 0 S-1SL 'S 206. r 5 wMD '8 14. 76
:'ET-r ¢ 0 MILL-RATE S-LB '5 91. 75 ISD 'S 51.91
E<LD-X 'S 0 * 1`_ 1665 CITY 'S .00 IADP 5 6. 11
HID-3{ '5 0 -1 90-
AO-.Y• -S 0 PPRO:XIMATE --. 13.9.0 TAXES -- TOTAL 6 553.24
14f-1-X 'S 0
S TREE T-LOC MA 151900 RES477
PC 02 QC MR ID 791 2 1 SOK`.,1+o+C 791 2 1 600006
FOLIO 79121600000 OWt4ERt• OAELE TR ET ALT LAMAR
STRAP 151900 C 632}32 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY STE 2...) v-v-.Ey-v-40 .
PG 3 26 ITM 14 TAX ROLL FORMA
SALE DATE 0 0 662 v-v-v- v-v-v-v-+!•
7. AM T 0
ACRES .06 NAPLES FL 33942 aao6 AC
LEGAL-1 dAr .DERBILT BCH CENTER EtLX C 10 LAND-S 42075 ARELIMIN P'
-2 LOT 6 OR 970 PO 45? 5 OR 975 USE-CD IMP•s 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 674 ,OR 1232 PG 70 TOTLS 42075 VALUES
-4 TAXABLES 42075 -1991-
HMSTD-X '5 D MILL-CODE
100%-X •s 0 164 CNT`F '5 164.96 MSTU '5 18.47
CI+1-X •5 0 S-SL 'S 212. 7 6 wile '5 15.03
VET-X 15 0 MILL-RATE S-LB I. 93.52 ISD 'S 52.91
E<LD-X '5 0 * 15. 16'40 CITY •S .00 VADP S 6.24
WID-X 5 0 -1 s,so-
AO-X 'S 0 *AP'PROK IMATE --I 19'?0 TAXES -- TOTAL 'S 563. 3.3
ith!-X '5 0
STREET--LOC NA 151900 RE5477
• FC 02 DC NR ID 7912134:r+:'f2 79121606
FOLIO 7918184 JO 2 t tt4ER1 GAELE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRAP 151900 C 73A32 26:00 GOLDEN GATE P-KWY STE 200 v-r-v+ vrw v-v-
PG 9226 I TM 15 TAY. ROLL FORMA
SALE DATE ;i E►6ed
S AMT 0
ACRES -CIS NAPLES FL 3 3343 3206 AC
LEGAL-1 4IANDERBILT SCH CENTER BLK C 10 LAND'E 423 0 ARELIMINAF
LOT 7 OR 970 PG 459 S OR '375 USE-CD IMS-s 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 674,OR 1282 PG 70 TOTL'S 42.3.50 VALUES
-4 TAXABLE'* 4astlo -1-4-41-
HMSTD-Y v :} MILL-CODE
100-4.-K S 0 164 CUT'( E 167.9S 6 t TU 'S 13. 30:*
C I V-X 'S 0 S--SL 'S als.szs WM8 'S 15- 31
VET-X T-): 'S •:t MILL-RATE 3-LB V C-.tl.aa ISD 'S .=. d?
BLD-1: 'S 0 15. 1336 CITY S .00 is ADP S 6. 34
MID-X -S 0 -1990-
AG-1: V 0 + PPRQxIMtATE --t• 1990 TAXES !-- TOTAL S 574_ 13
WH-.'+: V 0
STREET-LOC MA 151900 RE6477
FC 4i OC NR ID 7912 7slaissoo04 79121600006
FOLIO 791218804:+04 OWt4ERJ• GABLE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRAP 151900 C 33A32 2600 GOLDEN GATE A+KWY STE 30'C v- ie• v-
PG 9226 ITM 16 TAX ROLL FORMA
SALE DATE 0 0682
V AMT 0
ACRES .06 MAPLES FL 33'342 3206 AC
LEGAL-1 VANDERBILT SCH CENTER ECLE C 10 LAND'S 43625 ARELIMINAR'
-i LOT 8 OR 970 PG 459 S OR 975 USE-CD IMF- 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 674,OR 1282 Pe 70 TOTLS 43625 VALUES
-`" TAXABLES 43625 -1--41-
HMSTD-X V 0 MILL-CODE
100%-,Y, 0 164 CY4T'F !i 171.06 MSTU 1'3. 15
CI V-! 7i S- SL S
220.64 HME 'S
15. 60
'.'ET-t! 7.
0 MILL-RATE S-LB S 36.'3d ISD $ X4. 80
PLD-t! S 0 r. 2E. 1883
CITY 8 .:1+? {IA S 6. 46
HID-f 5 ':+ -1'490-
s'G-K S 0 *-APPROXIMATE --t• 19-4) TAKES '-- Tr�,L 'S O �5
T 4.
WH-X 'S 0
STREET--LOC t4A l',.:)0 PES4;'7
4
FC 02 CC MR ID 73121'3200':p3 7'31216006
FOLIO 751:?1 550003 0Wt4ER, GABLE TR ET ALT LAMAR
STRAP 1513 00 C 33A.1ta 2600 GOLDEN GATE c +.1.!•f STE isosT
PG 3226 ITM 17 TAY ROLL FOPmA
SALE DATE ':► 0682 w1 r-r.r-K v- y-v-
* AMT 0
ACRES .06 MAPLES FL 3334 3 .06 AC
LEGAL-1 +:AANDERBILT $CH CENTER BLX C 10 LAMD* 44375 PRELIMIt4A?'
-:_ LOT 3 OR S70 PG 459 S OR 375 USE-CD I3 11 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 6747 OR 1252 PG 70 TOTLS 44375 VALUES
-4 TAXABLE* 4437 -1- 41-
HMSTD-Y S 0 MILL-CODE
100r.t-Y, 5 0 164 CMTY S 174.06 MSTU S 13. 4
CI+.-Y, * ;? S-•SL 5 224.51 44ff; •5
15-36
VET-Y 5 0 MILL-RATE S-LB •S 3@.65 ISD 5 ' ..5.6--
BLD-Y 5 0 v.- 15. 1555 CITY S -00 :'ADP •S 6_55
WID-X S 0 -13'30-
AG-Y. S 0 *APPROXIMATE --t• 1330 TAXES. -- TOTAL S 5-95.01
WH-Y •5 0
STREET-LO►C MA 151900 RE3477
FC o2 CC MR ID 7312 136•0.tz 7'3121600006
't" FOLIO 7sialf4.s000 GHt•EERt• GABLE TR ET ALT LAMAR
STRAP 1Z13-o C 103A32 2600 GOLDEN GATE f •1.WY STE 200
PG '3ia6 ITM 15 TAX ROLL FORT i r
SALE DATE 0 0682
S AMT ',;f
ACRES -06 MAPLES FL 3394/2 sao6 AC
LEGAL-1 '/AMCERBILT BCH CENTER BLX C 10 LAND* 45050 PRELIMIMAR'r
-a LOT 1:0 OR 370 PG 45S S OR 375 USE-CD IMP* 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 8747 OR 1235 PG 70 TOTL'S 4050 VALUES
-j" TAXAE'LE* 45350 -1'_31 -
HMSTD-Y 5 0 MILL-CODE
100-4-Y. 5 0 164 Ct4TY 5 176.6a MSTU 'S 1S. 77
CIS:-Y 5 0 S-EL S 227.81 WMB •S 16. 10
41ET-X •5 0 MILL-RATE 'S_B .S 100. 13 ISO 5 56.64
BLD-Y 5 0 w 15. 1887 CITY •S .00 '•:ADP 5 6.68
WID-X S 0 -1'4'40-
AC-Y• -Sr 0:e PPS•RC r I MATE --. 13'30 TAXES '-- TOTAL S 603. 75
Wt-±-Y 5 0
STREET-LC*C MA 151500 RES'.77
AP
4
- FC 02 DC !4R ID 731 ii:rO0':µ:h3 79121 6E*':ro`06
FOLIC 7.9. 122w..l+lq+.l<o3 CW14ERk GABLE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRA:. 1'130:µ:r C 113f4.312 ascs:* GOLDEN GATE P'!.WY STE CtCt;i w v..r.r-v.Y-.,-
f'e 9227 ITM 1 TAX: ROLL FORMA
SALE DATE 0 :*68:: w..44-*.www, v*.-
$ AMT 0
ACRES .:*6 mAPLE9 FL 33942 3206 AC
LEGAL-1 :'AMDERBILT BCH CENTER ELf! C 10 LAt4D'S 4.5900 PARELIMIl4AR
—2 LOT 11 OR 370 PG 45,9 S OR 375 USE—CD IM P$ 0 ASSESSED
PG 674,OR 1282 Pe 70 TOTL$ 45,400 :`ALUE'S
—4 TA KABLE'8 4°_!_,`s e —1331—
HMS TD—X S 0 MILL—CODE
100%—X $ 0 164 CNTY -$ 173.34 MSTU .0 2,:p.. 15
CIV-X .s .0. 232. 11$ ZL ? 4tM6 T 16- 41
VET—•Y, $ 0 MILL—RATE S—LB s 102...
BLD—Y 't 0 y- 1`_<. 1886 CITY ? .00 +: DP $ a0;
WlD—X $ 0 6. L
—13'x:*—
AO—X - 0 *APPROXIMATE --3- 1330 TAXES {-- TOTAL $ 615. 14
44f-f—X. $ 0
STREET—LC*C NA 1.519`:*O RE'3477
FC 02 CC MR ID 79122040005 79121600006
FOLIO 79122040005 OWU€R1- GABLE TR ET AL, LAMA R
STRAP 151'400 C 123A32 2800 GOLDEN GATE PKWY STE 2-0 *riv.-wv.v.e�rwa.
PG 9227 ITM 2 TAX ROLL FOsRMA
SALE DATE 0 0662 v.vi!vvwvr.
' 'S Ps'fT 0
ACRES .06 MAPLES FL 33942 32.*.Kt PC
i
LEGAL-1 +:At4D€R B I L T BCH CENTER BLf? C 10 LA44D' 46750 f=REL I M I l4AR'r
—2 LOT 12 OR 370 PO 4!'3 S OR 375 USE—CD IMF— 0 ASSESSED
—3 PG 674,OR 1282 PL 70 TOTL'S 4670 VALUES
—4 TA.Y,ABLE's 4670 —1991 —
tfMSTD—y -8 0 MILL—CODE
100 —x $ 0 164 CMTY $ 183.2-3 MSTU -$ 2$.3.'12
CI':—X 'Ii 0 S—SL $ 236.40 WMR •T. 16. 70
VET—X $ 0 MILL—RATE S—LB $ 103.31 ISD $ ,.6- 78
- ELD—X * 0 * 15. 1884 CITY ' .00 :'ADP A 6.92
WID—X •s: 0 —1990—
AO—K s 0 A ARC*X IMATE -- 1' .:* TAXES !-- TOTAL I. s24_ 2
STREET—LOC NA 151900 P.E'S477
I Iripp:
i
FC 03 DC MR ID 73123080007 73131600006
FOLIO 731i2.2060007 OWMER.• GABLE TR ET ALA LAMAR
STRAP 151 300 C 133A33 3EC'C' GOLDEM GATE PfffW STE s:'o wv-,..i.-4,,
PG s2 a7 ITM 3 TAW ROLL FORMA
SALE DATE C 06+82 w,. v-v-vvry-vrr.
V AMT 0
ACRES .06 MAPLES FL 3.3344 3206 AC
LEGAL-1 +.ANDERE<ILT EACH CENTER ELK C 10 LAM0v 4750< PRELIMINrAR'
-2 LOT 13 OR 375 PO 453 3 OR '375 USE-CD IMPv 0 ASSESSED
-3 pS 674T OR 183 PG 70 TOTL''S 47510 VALUES
-4
TAXAErLES 47'';00 -1'431-
HMSTD-Y v 0 MILL-CODE
1:w%-X V 4 164 CY4TY '9 1G. 1 7 MSTL4 8 a..i.ia5
CI+:-Y 8 0 S-SL 0 240. 13 WMB 'S 16.37
IET-X 7S 0 MILL-PATE S-La 9 105.55 ISD 't °!3. 71
ErLD-X 'S 0 w 15. 18'70 CITY 5 .0< VADP 1 7.04
f~t I D-X 'S 0 -13'=-x0-
' AG-X 'S C, *APPROXIMATE --I• 1330 TAXES S-- TOTAL $ 636.43
f+4f•3-•v, 7 0
STREET-LCOC Y4A 151300 RES477
PC 02 DC MR ID 73122120006 75121600006
FOLIO 7312 1a:KK*6 OWNER) CABLE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRAP 1Z1S00 C 143A32 2600 GOLDEN GATE P'f-(WY STE 2'C%C v-1FV-v-vrvrwvrvr
PO 3227 ITM 4 TAX ROLL FORMAT
SALE DATE 0 0688
'* AMT 0
ACRES .07 MAPLES FL 33 340 0000
' LEGAL-1 +:ANDERBILT PCH CENTER ErLF: C 10 LA 4L?E 48375 PRELIMIMAR`r
-2 LOT 14 OR 370 PG 453 v. OR 375 USE-CD I Mf=r& 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 674,OR 1282 PG 70 . TOTL`S 43275 VALUES
-4 TAXABLE* 4ea7s -1331-
OHMSTD-Y 9, 0 MILL-CODE
10Cr%-Y, v :i 164 CY4TY i 183.23 MSTU 0 21. 13
I. CIV-X ¢ 0 S--SL * 244. 14 WMS 7• 17.1
VET-X V 0 MILL-RATE S-LS 's 107. 31 ISO '8 60. 71
SLD-X .A 0 v' 15. 188` CITY V .00 VADP V 7. 15
NID-X V 0 -1'330-
W/-K $ 0 'PRO..IM-ATE --t 133:' TAKES !-- T_sZ
Tom._ s 647. 0.3
WH-Y '9 0
STREET-LOC MA 1'71'400 PE=477
FC 3 OC MR ID 7312 16R:t)08 73131 6 1 r
0:N.t6
FOLIO 79122160008 OWMlER: GABLE TR ET At.T LAMAR
STRAP 1110o C 1535432 2600 GOLDEN BATE PKWY STE 200 wwwi W4,,,,,,v-v-
PC 9227 ITM 5 TAX ROLL FORMA
SALE DATE {t 0682 wwv-vrwv-+ty-
$ AMT D
ACRES .07
NAPLES FL J.34a 32: AC
LEGAL-1 '•dA?4DERBILT BCH CENTER BLK C 10 LAMD$ 49050 PRELIMIMAR':
— LOT 15 OR 370 PG 459 3 OR 375 USE-CD IMP'* 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 674,OR 1382 Pe 70 TOTL'S 4'4050 VALUES
-4 TAXABLE S 4 0S-Zt -19'41-
HMSTD-X 'S 0 MILL-CODE
104Y%-/C - 0 164 C?-ETY * 131.28 MSTU Z+ al_--,-;
CI'•.'-X 'S 0 S-9L 7. 248.01 $.*8 $ 17.'"3
VET-X - 0 MILL-RATE S-LB $ 109.01 ISD $ 61.67
t
B-D-X 'S 0 w 15. 1887 CITY 'S .00 VADP * 28 WID-X ?: 0 -1590-
AQ-X T 0 40-APPROXIMATE --t• 1330 TAXES S-- TOTAL 'S 657.
i4H-X - 0
STREET-LOC MA 1 •1500 RES477
FC 2 CC ?4R ID 79122200007 75121600+.106
FOLIO 73122 000':,7 Cpl-ER} AABLE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRAP 151900 C 1635433 ib00 GOLDEN GATE PV.WY STE 200
PG 9227 ITM 6 TAX ROLL FORMAT
SALE DATE 0 0682 wv-v-wwwwwv-
$ AMT 0
ACRES .07 MAPLES
FL 33342 3206 At.:.
LEGAL-1 VAMDERBILT BCH CENTER BL$- C 10 LP,UD$ 43825 ARELIMIMAR's'
-a LOT 16 OR 370 PG 45-9 3 OR 375 USE-CD IM P$ 0 ASSESSED
-3 PE 6741OR 1282 PG 70 TOTL'S 4385 VALUES
-4 TA.XABLES 49835 -11 -
HMSTD-X 'S 0 MILL-CODE
1`:t:1%-K -S 0- 164 CMTY !r 135. 33 MSTU $ 21.87
CIS:-X 'O 0 S-9L 'S x2.03 4FMB 'S 1 7. 81
+1ET-Y. 'S 0 MILL-RATE S-LB '8 110. 77 ISD $ 62.67
BLD-X '9 `} w 15. 1886 CITY '8 .00 /ADP - 7. 3•
W.D-Y. •y, 0 -1 }-
A£-{ S it -APF'ROe X fl*A T E --, 13'3':t TAXES '-- TOTAL 0 6S7- ?,1'
WH-X 'S 0l
STREET-LOC ?4A 1514. P.E5477
.., FC :► OC t4R ID 7.5122240003 731:.1600-,':t
FOLIO 791222400 5 OWt4ER3 GABLE TR ET AL, LAMAR
STRAP 151500 C 173A32 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY STE 200 www+rwwwww,
PG 5227 ITM 7 TAX ROLL FOR A
SALE DATE 0 ,►6g2 w.-wwwy.www
* AMT 0
ACRES .07 NAPLES FL 3334 3206 AC
LEGAL-1 VAt4DERBILT BCH CENTER BLK C 10 LAND•8 50575 ARELIMIUAP
-2 LOT 17 OR 370 Pe 453 3 OR 375 USE-CD IMF* 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 674 T OP 1 232 AQ 70 TOTL a 75, ALUES
-4 `
TAXABLE* -10575 -13?1 -
HMSTD-X * 0 MILL-CODE
100%-X * 0 164 Ct4TY •8 138.27 MSTU •S a..:,
• . CI+:-X •S 0 S-SL T+ 255. 75 btMs 5 13_03
• VET-' 0 MILL-RATE S-LB $ 112.41 ISO S 63.6,0
. BLD-X •S 0 * 15. 133e CITY a .00 VArDP '!i
, .4
wID-X
AO-X •b 0 wAc'AROXImATE - 1550 TAXES !-- TOTAL •S 677. 5+:r
WH-X •6 'Cr
STREET-LOC HA 151500 RE3477
FC 02 OC MR ID 7512223 001 75121600006
FOLIO 75122 230001 OWtfER!• GABLE TR ET AL/ LAMAR
rSTRAP 1513+�3 C 133A32 2600 GOLDEN GATE Pi-:w STE 200 wwwwwwwww
�'C3 =�►i ITM S TAX ROLL FORMA
SArLE DATE 0 0.632
wwwwwwwwr.
•5 AMT 0
ACRES .0.3 NAPLES FL 33342 3206 AC
LEGAL-1 VANDERBILT BCH CENTER BLK C 10 LAAND•S 66250 ARELIMIr4AR'
• -2 LOT 13 OR 370 Pe 455 3 OR 575 USE-CD IMP* 0 ASSESSED
-3 PG 67 4.OR 1 232 PG 70 TO T L'S 662t 0 VALUES
-4 TAX.AELE'r 66250 -1551-
HMSTD-X a 0 MILL-CODE
1001;c-y -S 0 164 CYdTy •6 253. 70 MSTU * 23.e
CIV-X .y 0 S-SL •a 334.58 WMB 'S 23.67
VET-X • T+ 0 MILL-RATE S-LB * 147.24 ISD -a 33. .'3
BLD-X •t 0 * 1 5. 1337 CI T'! 'S .00 +.ADS` * 5. 32
SIID-ir• y 0 -133ET-
Tit-x 5 0 t,, RO IMA= --. s3 .) r A E= -- TOTAL •a ee7_ ?
44H-X Ii .0
STREET-LOC: NA E
•
ipoime
M E M O R A N D U M•
TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Murdo Smith, Acting Department Director /
Parks & Recreation Department
SUBJECT: PARAB Applicants
DATE: June 19, 1991
Please be advised that The Collier County Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board has selected Mr. Rodney E. Thralls, of 5990
Springline Drive, Naples, Florida, 33940 to fill the vacancy of
District 4 (Naples) . Mr. Thralls telephone number is 262-8288 .
MS:rtd: 003552
0 .
i
U.Ins ;i-t .:a..,.-ii t_.
CD IZI CD re = FL.
0) (el .--.-
-i ..
CL.
-
j ry
Li
P Cj 1".---)F'..C.. B
T F--." C: J CFI..7 .-.-
- r—un I-= c'+-
—5 7 RlC: 0
73 J✓
I- -•.J -+
i77(t .--
. - -3
ii,-I —
I--'-- c
r+
-Ti -
St CI
i_f]T
a7
12D
Iy1Tl
Ri O
r-' ;
.i {
■
O1
CJ
1V
i
O
\1t
V
9 ti
a
COLL IFQ Co N y.'
\.'ER CO
O PAR K,5 ECfRE9LTIO
DEPARTMENT
LL 4
gtoptio
RECREW fAX LFOR7v1
TO:
ATTENTION :
FROM : o�� i)au s $ecre/Q�
9 � y
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
MESSAGE: ,Pue fGe iie/
QG'le /1 0 c,, ,fQc f' u/&
bail/ rnf he 06/e 71:0 Gala/ -/die
5,ec;Q/ ):7 172 -1,9--f/ 3
If you have any questions, please call (813) 353-0404, or Fax (813) 353-1002
IC 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd., Naples, Florida 33999
0
•
e 3a1-/ (
e > o _Inmo
ju as a* o .
ca, m = c = m
m �
S%
a }
•
. . . . . . . . /
/ \
Se e owD s
3- cmo —
\
�gar-i
( o
: s e mD o «
5
.70 s
• _q :
j \
o y
e = <
» <
• & \
?3 w <
m o
,--.- f_, �;
, ,
0) —
T n
a' 0
L
cn cv
m m
CD -
a. — ii
€r, 0 ,LL
CD .-I
L_ CD _
1
I— -
n ID
Di
Ijl
!f f
fil
al
I'n
ICI
=? ! (_"'
. .+
1 CD ,y
f-r
I _-1
i
i
E t
I
`1
■
i
i c
i t
, t f
j C
It
COLLIER COUNTY
•,,ER Cod
PARgc AV) RECREATION
L
o
DEPARTMENT
"7S.
ce RECR FAxFoRM
TO: C //j e r C� ui-fy C/;n i6
ATTENTION : CA e rryle, 7i1orr1 G L5
FROM : /fir / u/- 5-19-2, 7117
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: / 7
MESSAGE: U/e • / �se ms;( oe/ 74/6e
r, spa/ 0/1 yo a
i uta 5fi /7S ,9/eo5e eU/) 't , $, fife ® // /7S,
Ma/7 yon
If you have any questions, please call (813) 353-0404, or Fax (813) 353-1002
3300 Santa Barbara Blvd., Naples, Florida 33999
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Murdo Smith, Acting Department Director
Parks & Recreation Department
SUBJECT: PARAB Applicants
DATE: June 7, 1991
At the May 22, 1991 meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Board meeting, a recommendation was made to fill the vacancy of
District I (Naples) . This recommendation is for Ms. A. Carol
Pahl, 836 Woodshire Lane, K-6, Naples, Florida, 33942 . Her home
telephone number is 262-0054 and her office telephone number is
262-1755.
After this recommendation was made, a couple of days later, it
was found out that Ms. A. Carol Pahl does not live within
District I, and actually lives in District II.
MS:rtd: 003502
0
*A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 3300 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 33999
(813) 353-0404
A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY
May 29, 1991
Mrs. Cherryle Thomas
516-A Farm Workers Village
Immokalee, Florida 33934
Dear Mrs. Thomas
Enclosed is a draft copy of the report compiled by the Productivity
' Committee pertaining to the Parks and Recreation Department. This
report was presented to the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday,
May 28th, and will be discussed in detail at the Budget Hearings. At
this time a final copy has not been received by the Department.
Also enclosed are the requested minutes of the workshop held on March
14th, 1991.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Murdo Smith
Acting Parks and Recreation Director
0
•
11111‘ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 3300 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 33999
(813) 353-0404
A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY
May 29, 1991
Mr. Gil Mueller
541 Blackmore Court
Marco Island, Florida 33937
Dear Gil:
Enclosed is a draft copy of the report compiled by the Productivity
Committee pertaining to the Parks and Recreation Department. This
report was presented to the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday,
May 28th, and will be discussed in detail at the Budget Hearings. At
this time a final copy has not been received by the Department.
Also enclosed are the requested minutes of the workshop held on March
14th, 1991.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Murdo Smith
Acting Parks and Recreation Director
•
IA COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 3300 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 33999
(813) 353-0404
A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY
May 29 , 1991
Kim Patrick Kobza, Esquire
Lieberfarb, Trieser, Kobza & Leigh, Chartered
801 Twelfth Avenue South
Naples, FLorida 33940
Dear Kim:
Enclosed is a draft copy of the report compiled by the Productivity
Committee pertaining to the Parks and Recreation Department. This
report was presented to the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday,
May 28th, and will be discussed in detail at the Budget Hearings. At
this time a final copy has not been received by the Department.
Also enclosed are the requested minutes of the workshop held on March
14th, 1991.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Murdo Smith
Acting Parks and Recreation Director
III
•
511A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 3300 SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 33999
(813) 353-0404
A CERTIFIED BLUE CHIP COMMUNITY
May 29, 1991
Ms. Geneva Till
2164 42nd Street SW
Naples, FL 33999
Dear Ms. Till:
Enclosed is a draft copy of the report compiled by the Productivity
Committee pertaining to the Parks and Recreation Department. This
report was presented to the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday,
May 28th, and will be discussed in detail at the Budget Hearings. At
this time a final copy has not been received by the Department.
Also enclosed are the requested minutes of the workshop held on March
14th, 1991.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Murdo Smith
Acting Parks and Recreation Director
7 , • , .„
-.
.-
410 REPORT OF PUBLIC SERVICE DIVISION SUBCOMMITTEE
ON THE
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Purpose
The Public Service Division Subcommittee reviewed the
operation of the Parks and Recreation Department to determine
methods to improve efficiency and effectiveness with
particular attention to:
. Fees and charges
. Operational conditions
. Recreational programs
. Special programs
Approach
' The Subcommittee reviewed the following documents:
. 1990-91 adopted budget
. 110 . Parks and Recreation Organizational Chart
. Brochures and pamphlets on programs and services
. Special report on 1990-91 operating costs and revenues
for each park location
. Special report on 11 •0 1 et-ing costs and revenues
for beach fact r
. Inven L .
Inventory of equ m-��
. Fee schedules fo various activities
. Report of Sites and Acres Maintained
The Subcommittee interviewed the following individuals
. Murdo Smith, Acting Parks and Recreation Director
. Gary Franco , Park Superintendent
•
. Mary Ellen Donner, Recreation Superintendent
. Jean Egan, Senior Fiscal Clerk
. Kim Kobza, Chairman, Parks and Recreation Advisory
Committee
. Bob Burn, Budget Analyst , Office of Management and
Budget
. Mike McNees , Director, Office of Management and
Budget
■ Findings , Conclusions and Recommendations
The Parks and Recreation Department has seen very significant
III growth in the past three years as the County has completed
the majority of projects funded by the 1982 bond issue . From
a fledgling department which mostly utilized school and
neighborhood facilities with a $1 . 1 million annual budget
/
, . . n y
__
, .
:, .
111 five years ago , the Department now has 36 sites, a $3 . 15
million budget and 68 employees . The Department provides
parks and recreation serves equal to those typically found in
municipal governments .
The time is optimal for a critique of this Department. It
has matured and is undergoing a major shift of management
personnel . The full operational impact on ad valorem taxes
of the $8 million, 1982 bond issue is also being seen. It is
an appropriate time to ask citizens what they want users to
fund and what do citizens want to fund through ad valorem
taxes. Incidentally, many park users are not taxpayers . If
not charged a fee, they pay nothing for the service.
Our overall recommendations include:
1 . An increased revenue-producing and entrepreneurial
approach to the operation of the Department. We witnessed
many areas where increase revenues could be realized, with
little impact on Collier County taxpayers.
2 . Charging a standardized fee at all facilities which
have been developed for a specialized user. Fee revenues
should equal the operating , maintenance and repair costs of
the facilities.
3 . Viewing the Parks and Recreation Department as the
enterprise operation it is , requir' g ccountability,
marketing and promotion n l c t o system for its
staff. (� u
4 . Standardization of parks maintenance equipment to minimize
out-of-service time. Adding a repair element to the low-bid
analysis of parks maintenance equipment.
5 . Develop additional sources of revenue to fund the Park
Ranger program to pay for the increased and sometime
duplicative services the Rangers offer or phase-out the
program.
USER FEES
The agony over trying to decide what to charge and when
is a never-ending one in the parks and recreation area.
For the sake of this report , our recommendations are based
upon charging a fee for any park or recreation facility which
have been developed for a specialized user. This allows
the park user who wishes to visit as a passive activity to do
so without a charge. Once he or she wishes to engage in an
activity, a fee would be charged equal to the cost . There
are two exceptions :
1 . Not charge those under the age of 18 unless they
are participating in league play with a sponsor.
. ..,
.
.,
i:
II2 . If it costs more to collect the fee , then there
should be no fee.
The County also has a definite need for consistency in the
items and locations for which it charges . In some cases , we
found the County is consistent. We charge uniformly for
recreation classes . We charge for concession items . We
charge for league play organized by the Department. However ,
other than those areas we found inconsistencies. There is a
parking charge at Clam Pass but not at the Bonita Beach
parking facility. There are five boat launching facilities
but only one, Caxambas Pass , has a fee.
Fees for public facilities are often an emotional issue.
Great political pressures are brought against County
Commissioners to not charge fees. Yet, we have to question
the wisdom of this pressure when another form of taxation, ad
valorem, will be used to pay for the costs fees do not pay.
An example was the proposal to raise beach parking to $2
per car last year. The fee is justified by direct operating
costs of beach and beach parking facilities. There was a lot
of citizenry opposition. As a result, some $160 ,000 in
• operating costs for beach operations are being funded this
year by ad valorem taxes.
Beach Parking Fees p
It is currently costing e Count y $358 , 000
a year to staff,
maintain and protect the County' s seven beach facilities for
which it provides facilities and services. It expects to
collect about $198 , 000 in beach parking fees at the $1 per
car rate. Fees are only collected where an attendant is
present. Those locations include Clam Pass , Tigertail and
Vanderbilt. Parking facilities are provided at the following
locations where no fees are charged:
Barefoot Beach Preserve 67 spaces
Bonita Beach 100 spaces
Gulfshore Blvd. North ( Seagate) 25 spaces
The current practice is to charge a fee only equal to the
collection cost. Yet costs are incurred in other ways for
these facilities . The above $358 , 000 cost includes
maintenance , repairs and Park Rangers costs , pro-rated
to time spent at each facility. Beach parking is currently
operating at a $160 , 000 annual loss. Unfortunately, the
beach parking fee issue has been highly politicized by
comparably small user groups . A proposed $1 increase was
rejected by the County Commission last year which came under
significant pressure . Ad valorem taxpayers had to make up
the difference for a fee increase which would had hardly been
noticed by beach users of which 80% are estimated to be non-
residents .
1 . . ,..
ItRECOMMENDATION:
Based upon current activity and costs , the beach parking fee
needs to be at $2 per car. This increase could be reduced
somewhat by the implementation of parking meters in areas
where no fee is charged.
The use of parking meters should be particularly considered
for the smaller, lesser used facilities . Park rangers are
already available for enforcement and the capital costs per
year are very low. The City of Naples collected over
$290 , 000 from its 679 beach area meters last fiscal year,
an average of $429 per meter per year. We don' t project
County beach meters would earn as great an income. However,
if each meter averaged $215 per year, the income would be
over $40 , 000 annually, not including fines and forfeitures .
Parking meters will cost about $45 ,000 to install . The cost
will probably be recovered within the first year. The life
is at least 10 years.
Boat Ramp Fees -
The County soon will ha e a� r p facilities. It
charges a fee at one, C m s ass. The
other facilities
include State Road 951 , Bayview Park, Lake Trafford and
Conklin Point near Wiggins Pass Marina which is to opened
later this year. All receive considerable use .
The State Road 951 boat ramp, which charges no fee, is
suspected of competing with a boat ramp with a fee at
Caxambas Pass. The fee at Caxambas is currently $2 and is
collected by a private concessionaire with a County Contract
to sell bait and fuel .
RECOMMENDATION:
A consistent fee be charged at each boat ramp facility
throughout the County, utilizing staff where the activity
• warrants it and parking meters where the activity does not.
Developed boat ramps should break even, considering all
related activities not just parking attendants . Parking
permits could be sold to frequent users .
Fees Charged at Parks and Other Recreation Facilities
We also found the same discrepancies regarding fees charged
at parks . League softball and baseball players pay a fee .
However, those who independently utilize the fields do not.
Those using the football and soccer fields , even if most
who play in an organized league , are charged no fees.
Currently, the $110 ,000 cost of maintaining the 15 fields
throughout the County and salaries of athletic staff is
kilo almost covered by the $103 , 000 in annual revenues . This area
still needs to break even and be watched closely. Tennis
players at the racquet club on Marco Island pay a fee .
4
j
IITennis players in the community parks do not. The County' s
Racquet Club on Marco Island also deserves special
consideration. It was purchased by the County in 1984 to
provide a more organized tennis program on Marco Island.
There is a center supervisor, who devotes his time to tennis
programs elsewhere in the County, a tennis pro , one full-time
and one part-time employee . Total expenses this year will be
$80 , 203 while income is expected to be $50 , 000 , reflecting a
$30 , 000 loss . We don' t see the inherent need for the County
to operate a tennis program such as offered by the private
sector, certainly not when it operates at a loss .
RECOMMENDATION:
The County should look at ways to reduce the loss or consider
closing the Racquet Club. Two possible reasons for the loss
is the fact that only two of the five courts are lighted and
the courts are not the desired clay surface . They are
modified asphalt. Tennis players can play on asphalt courts
at Tommie Barfield School which are lighted for free. There
is space for two additional courts if usage makes it
feasible. Promotion and marketing also needs to be reviewed.
Beach Parking Fee Paid e hit
LI
While the County charge u • u'ers to park at the major beach
facilities, it pays the City $96 , 000 so County residents may
park free. This is also inconsistent with the overall policy
proposed herein.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend that payment of any beach parking fee to the
City be discontinued and the City be asked to provide a
annual parking permit for County residents for a fee . If
County residents do not wish to pay a meter charge, they can
purchase this permit as they may now do for $30 to avoid
County beach parking fees.
RECREATION CLASS INCOME
The County offers a proliferation of classes with minimum
participation levels dictating whether or not the class is
offered. Some 200 classes are held each year. Classes
are either taught by independent contractors , with a 70/30
split of fees . The contractor receives 70%. The average
class costs $25 per participant. They range in size from 5
to 15 participants . Classroom hours average about 1 . 5 hours
per session for six weeks. An instructors' earnings can
range from $6 to $42 per hour.
Consideration is being given to placing instructors on
a per hour status to reduce cost. However, we would be
cautious if the instructors recruit a significant number of
5-
. . . .
- .
4110 students for their classes .
RECOMMENDATION:
`rho hourly rate for instructors resulting from the current
system varies greatly and can be very high. We suggest a
review of the current contracting split but with caution in
regard to instructor motivation. Possibly, the County could
set a cap on the effective hourly rate.
Consideration is also being given to a request by the YMCA
to conduct classes at Parks and Recreation facilities . This
should be considered very cautiously in terms of its negative
net effect on revenues.
PARKS SUPERVISION
Each community park is allotted two full-time personnel , a
parks supervisor and an assistant park supervisors. Park
supervisors have overall responsibility to the park during
all open hours. The parks supervisors are paid hourly and
are restricted to 40-hours per week without overtime
authorization. They are also required to teach classes 10
hours per week. Assistant park su a sors do just that and
are required to teach a minimu o 0 ours per week.
Overall income produced ' i iv' duals and contract
instructors is budgeted l s :
Park Location Operating Revenues Offset
Expenses*
• Golden Gate Community Park $365 , 050 $82 , 400 22 . 6%
Frank Mackle Community Park 283 , 911 52 , 900 18 . 6%
East Naples Community Park 243 , 979 34 , 200 14 . 0%
North Naples Community Park 282 , 330 76 , 400 27 . 1%
Immokalee Community Park 384 , 200 12 , 100 3 . 1%
Other Facilities** 640 , 030 129 , 200 20 . 2%
* Includes staffing , maintenance , repair and other
other operational costs
** Includes facilities on school grounds , neighborhood
parks , maintenance services to other county departments
and recreation programs .
The department currently has three assistant park supervisor
positions short . Those $15 , 000 annual positions have not
been filled due to the hiring freeze , leaving significant
gaps in coverage in the parks and significantly impact the
•
parks ' revenue. In fact, these positions bring in as much
income annually as their wages . There is no savings from not
filling these positions .
RECOMMENDATION:
The three assistant parks supervisors be filled before the
summer class season begins. Consideration be given to
making parks supervisors salaried so their schedule will
be dictated by park activities rather than an arbitrary
schedule .
RECOMMENDATION:
Revenue goals, to be developed and recommended by the
responsible park supervisor, be set for each community park.
The attainment of that goal would be regularly reviewed.
The park supervisor and other responsible staff members would
be rewarded in proportion to attainment of the goal in the
pay-for-performance system.
COMMUNITY CENTERS
The County currently operates two community centers with
three under construction. The comm . ty center on Golden
Gate Parkway is not included : i i funded by a special
taxing district. There r t %-e om unity centers under
construction in east an h ';p es and Immokalee. Under
the current County poli o not charging fees for non-profit
organizations , little income will be realized from these
centers yet they require full-time staff as well as operating
costs .
RECOMMENDATION
The existing policy of not charging a fee for not-for-profit
organizations should be re-considered prior to the opening
this fall of three additional community centers . The cost
of operating five community centers with no significant
revenues offers a very expensive proposition.
PARK RANGER PROGRAM
The Department has a Park Ranger program with three full-time
rangers and one ranger supervisor. A fourth ranger is being
added for assignment mostly at the Lely Barefoot Beach Park.
The conception of this program in September, 1988 , was
primarily based upon the need of additional enforcement of
County ordinances in parks , a perception of the presence of
law enforcement among park users , and the need for random
patrol in park facilities for reduction of vandalism. Park
Rangers were to be certified law enforcement aides with the
authority to issue citations .
r7
Park Rangers are patrolling all park facilities from Marco
Island to Immokalee , including a horseback patrol . Rangers
perform other duties such as closing parks , patrolling park
-facilities not staffed by County personnel , monitoring beach
vendors , offering informational programs and the monitoring
and protection of sea turtle nests .
We have several concerns about this program:
1 . Many of the duties Park Rangers perform are also
performed by the Sheriff' s Department such as
beach and park patrols . For example , deputy
sheriffs spend at least 15 hours per week patrolling
beaches in north Naples, including Barefoot Beach.
Deputies routinely are required to visit county parks
two to three times daily.
2 . There is no significant criminal conduct problem
in County Parks and beaches. If there were,
Sheriff' s deputies would still need to be summoned.
Any violation of State laws must be handled by
a certified law enforcement officer. All County
community parks and beach • .rks, with the exception
of Lely Barefoot Bea h lonita Beach Park, already
have County staff o e i to can summon Sheriff' s 1 deputies wheh ises. -
ul�
3 . Any chance of recovering some of the $100 ,000 plus
Park Ranger program through fines and forfeitures
from ordinance violation has been delayed for
twelve months because of a delay in passage of the
required ordinance. The rangers completed the
necessary training in June, 1990 .
4 . Random patrol has only proven to be a significant
deterrent of illegal conduct during the actual
presence of the law enforcement officer.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Park Ranger program needs to be revenue funded or
discontinued . The rangers spend at least 50% of their time
in beach parks. Therefore , beach revenues should be
increased to fund those costs. The need for Park Rangers in
beach parks is actually greater rather than Community Parks
where staff is usually present. Consideration should be given
to increasing their activities at beach parks , with the
additional revenues coming from beach parking fees . The
installation of beach parking meters could be a source of the
funding . Park Rangers would become responsible for
collection of meter revenues and issuing meter violation
citations .
If -the Park Ranger program is not funded by revenues and
e.
their is a need for additional enforcement, our
recommendation is to contract with the Sheriff' s Department
for additional services. The Sheriff ' s Department already
a Community Service Aide program with the authority being
sought for Park Rangers .
RECOMMENDATION:
If the program is continued, certifying Park Rangers to allow
them to issue citations needs to be expedited. If each of
the four rangers issued only one citation daily for County
ordinance violation, the annual revenue from that activity
could be as high as $30 , 000 , not including revenues from the
parking meter recommendation.
MARKETING AND PROMOTION
We were unable to determine the impact, but the marketing
and promotion staff of the Department have been in effect
cut in half. When a vacancy in the Recreation Supervisor,
the second in command, occurred, h position was not filled
due to the hiring freeze. Th: _ si ' on is responsible for
recreation supervision :O1 r1'- _ he ecreation
Superintendent to spen . - :erable amount of time in
marketing and promotion f programs, classes and activities.
The impact is seen in a reduction in revenues.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Recreation Supervisor position be exempted from the
•
hiring freeze and it be filled.
PARKS MAINTENANCE AND EQUIPMENT
Time did not permit an in-field analysis of park maintenance
and equipment. The Department has five crews which maintain
some forty locations on 331 acres, utilizing some 150 pieces
of equipment . They were recently placed a ten-hour, four-day
work week.
The equipment list shows a proliferation of equipment
manufacturers including eleven different mower manufacturers .
This proves to a nightmare for maintenance and repair
personnel . An adequate inventory of parts is very difficult
to maintain. Parts must then be ordered. Familiarity with
each manufacturer' s equipment is nearly impossible.
Mechanics must refer to repair manuals, if available at all .
Operator familiarity with backup equipment may reduce the
work accomplished. All of these factors mean decreased
productivity. We also found no consideration as to the
dependability of the equipment when bids are being
considered. When out-of-service time is considered, the low
bid may be the high bid at the end of the life for equipment .
Ci
While vehicle purchase is the responsibility of others in
County government, we also found no consideration of
maintenance and repair costs of vehicle purchased for the
Department. Many of the Departments' vehicles have some of
the poorest rating in terms of reliability compared to other
manufacturers. Many of the vehicles failed the National
Highway Traffic Safety' s crash tests , indicating a crash
under the test conditions would have resulted in a high
likelihood or virtual certainty of a serious or fatal injury.
The County is self-insured.
RECOMMENDATION:
The County should consider standardization of its more
common parks maintenance equipment, issuing a annual contract
with a multi-year extension of the agreement. The cost
of out-of-service time far outweighs the annualized purchase
price. Equipment which has not proved dependable , as
substantiated by County records, sht. d not be invited to
bid. We would suggest a mini ' . m ree years.
RECOMMENDATION:
There should be an analysis of existing equipment to
determine its reliability in comparison with the cost of
lost productivity. That equipment should be replaced.
Each hour of a five-employee crew costs $38 per hour.
RECOMMENDATION:
The practice of Parks and Recreation maintenance crews
maintaining library and Sheriff sub-station facilities
should be reviewed at the time when an additional crew
becomes necessary. Contracting these facilities should
be an evaluated alternative.
/0