Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 01/22/2015
PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING JANUARY 22, 2015 THE CLAM BAY COMMITTEE OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 22 AT 1 PM AT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION, LOCATED IN THE SUNTRUST BUILDING, SUITE 302, 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108. AGENDA The agenda includes, but is not limited: 1 . Roll call 2. Agenda approval 3. Approval of October 28 and November 6 meeting minutes 4. Audience comments 5. Scope of Services for Clam Bay RFP presented by Adam Northrup, Collier County Purchasing Department 6. Review of Clam Bay annual report 7. Update on when annual Tidal Analysis report will be available 8. Update on oysters in Clam Bay 9. Projected timeline for knowing level of County funding for Clam Bay monitoring 10. Update on tidal gauges 11 . Update on water quality data in STORET 12. Update on copper in Clam Bay a. When test results for Aug., Sept., Oct. & Nov. will be available b. Whether County lab can get values less than 3.0 for copper as FDEP did c. Merging Clam Bay and upland pond water quality monitoring 13. Information on option of in-house scientist 14. Date for next meeting 15. Adjournment ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO ONE (1) MINUTE PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE,WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT (239) 597-1749. VISIT US AT HTTP.//PELICANBAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET. 1/20/2015 10:39:48 AM CLAM BAY COMMITTEE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28,2014 The Clam Bay Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division met Tuesday,October 28at 1:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay located at 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples, Florida, 34108. The following members attended: Clam Bay Committee Susan O'Brien, Chairman Ken Dawson Joe Chicurel Mike Levy Tom Cravens Pelican Bay Services Division Board Henry Bachman Dave Trecker ex-officio Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst Marion Bolick, Operations Manager Lisa Resnick,Recording Secretary Also Present Mohamed Dabees, P.E., Ph.D.,Humiston&Moore Engineers Tim Hall, Principal, Turrell-Hall &Associates Arielle Poulos, Turrell-Hall& Associates Clam Bay Stakeholders Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation Charles Bodo, Pelican Bay Foundation Mary Johnson, Pelican Bay Foundation Gary Canino, Pelican Bay Foundation Robert Pendergrass, Pelican Bay Foundation Brad Cornell,Audubon Ted Raia Marcia Cravens Linda Roth Annice Gregerson Kathy Worley, Conservancy of Southwest Florida REVISED AGENDA 1. Roll call 2. Agenda approval 3. Audience comments 4. Suggested edits for the Clam Bay NRPA Management Plan 5. Approval of March 18, April 8,April 24, May 14, and June 11 minutes 6. Update on 10-year dredging permit application 7. Update on water quality data in STORET water quality monitoring 8. New sampling sites starting in January 9. Alternative lab for copper 10. Clam bay monitoring services a. Scope of services b. Conflict of interest provision 11. Clam Bay tidal range data from May 2013 to present Clam Bay Committee—Minutes October 28, 2014 Page 2 12. 12-month post dredging report 13. Foundation's involvement in dredging discussion 14.Next meeting 15. Adjourn ROLL CALL All Committee members were in attendance. AGENDA APPROVAL Mr. Cravens motioned,Mr. Levy seconded to approve the agenda as amended.[Add item 13. Foundation's involvement in dredging; transpose items 4 and 5; and allow Ms. Johnson to address some issues when she arrived]. The agenda was approved as amended unanimously. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Discussion was briefly held with a member of the audience regarding the BCC's comments on the plan at their last meeting regarding the permit application and the Management Plan, and their interdependency, if any. Ms. O'Brien indicated that this had been done. Ms. Kathy Worley and Ms. Linda Roth expressed their desire to provide input for the Plan as well. Ms. Mary Johnson noted that the Foundation had expressed their support for the Management Plan that had previously been submitted, and expressed her concern with the subsequent, significant revisions to the Plan, noting that the Conservancy cannot support them. Ms. Marcia Cravens stated that the County Commission had expressed the fact that the updated Management Plan would be the guiding document and would be essential to include in permit applications. She also expressed her concerns with the Plan as it presently stands. Mr. Ken Dawson felt that the BCC Board was happy with the Plan that was presented, and was simply looking for some adjustments to it. Mr. Henry Bachman and Mr. Charles Bodo from the Foundation agreed with Ms. Johnson's comments about the changes that have been made, and asked that her opinions be honored. SUGGESTED EDITS FOR THE CLAM BAY NRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN Ms. O'Brien opened this discussion with one of the two issues the BCC had asked the Committee to concentrate on,that being the ecological considerations. She noted that Appendix 5 was authored by Dr. Dabees, and should have his name on it,printed as provided in his PDF file. The correct language regarding the ecological conditions was discussed, and it was suggested that a separate section be wordsmithed in the dredging chapter dealing with them to highlight their importance. Clam Bay Committee—Minutes October 28, 2014 Page 3 Mr. Tim Hall suggested that there are areas that need to be rewritten that would allow some slight impacts for the overall health of the system. Ms. Worley felt that the Plan should be about monitoring the entire system,rather than focusing on dredging. Mr. Hall felt that the ecological criteria should be determining the types of activities to be undertaken and their scope. Dr. Dabees added that the criteria that is now available allows action to be taken proactively as opposed to retroactively. After further discussion on these ideas and how to balance all of these important issues in the Plan,the Commission agreed that Mr. Hall and Ms. Worley would meet within the next week to reach an agreement on the specific wording to be used to cover both fresh water and ecological considerations, taking the suggestions of the Stakeholders into consideration as well. The Committee will meet the following week to go over the new wording. The objectives will remain the same as opposed to a few word changes, but the flow charts will be eliminated. UPDATE ON 10-YEAR DREDGING PERMIT APPLICATION All the data has been gathered for this, and the construction drawings are the final thing needed. Dr. Dabees will provide them to Mr. Dorrill in the near future, and they will be shared with the Foundation engineer prior to the scheduled November 6 meeting. It is anticipated that the Application will be completed for submission before the Thanksgiving holiday. APPROVAL OF MARCH 18,APRIL 8,APRIL 24, MAY 14 AND JUNE 11 MINUTES The minutes of March 18, April 8,April 24 and May 14 were approved at the September meeting after changes were made. A MOTION was made by Mr. Cravens to approve the above mentioned minutes as amended. After a brief discussion, it was agreed that the Committee would wait until the complete amended minutes were provided to them before they voted on their final approval. Mr. Cravens motioned,Mr. Levy seconded to approve the June 11 meeting minutes as amended.[Change Mr. Cravens to Dr. Trecker as distributing handouts;change$7,000 to $70,0001. The June 11 minutes were approved as amended unanimously. WATER QUALITY DATA IN STORET WATER QUALITY MONITORING UPDATE Mr. Hall advised those present that the DEP was satisfied with all the submitted information and is currently writing the amendments to the program, which should take another month to six weeks. Mr. Hall will input the present data into STORET. Clam Bay Committee—Minutes October 28, 2014 Page 4 NEW SAMPLING SITES STARTING IN JANUARY The new site sampling program is set to move forward as scheduled in January. The data backup for previously completed sampling will be provided to the DEP as requested. Two new reporting stations along the berm were briefly discussed and what the costs would be for the collections. Mr. Levy motioned,Mr. Cravens seconded to recommend to the full Board that two new sites for water collection be added along the berm at Stations 6 and 8, effective in January. The motion carried unanimously. ALTERNATIVE LAB FOR COPPER Mr. Hall will explore some alternative labs for copper testing and their costs and advise the Committee. CLAM BAY MONITORING SERVICES Handouts were provided to the Committee on the monitoring being done by Turrell,Hall and other Clam Bay related expenditures. This contract expires April. Ms. O'Brien asked for feedback on the Conflict of Interest Provision, and felt that a procedure should be in place to advise the Board of any other work Mr. Hall may be doing for any other entity as they go through the RFP process. Mr. Dorrill will check with the purchasing director to see if there is already a policy in place that addresses this issue, and will advise the Committee. CLAM BAY TIDAL RANGE DATA FROM MAY 2013 TO PRESENT This information continues to be collected on a regular basis, and Ms. O'Brien asked Mr. Dorrill if those numbers could be provided to them on a quarterly or monthly basis. Mr. Dorrill will see that this is done along with the water quality information that is being provided. Dr. Trecker motioned,Dr. Chicurel seconded to adjourn. The motion carried unanimously and meeting adjourned at 3:26 p.m. Susan O'Brien, Chairman 1/20/2015 9:57:19 AM CLAM BAY COMMITTEE THURSDAY,NOVEMBER 6,2014 The Clam Bay Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division met Thursday,November 6 at 9:00 AM at the Pelican Bay Services Division office, located in the SunTrust Building, Suite 302, at 801 Laurel Oak Drive,Naples, Florida, 34108. The following members attended: Clam Bay Committee Susan O'Brien, Chairman Ken Dawson Joe Chicurel Mike Levy Tom Cravens Pelican Bay Services Division Board Henry Bachman Dave Trecker ex-officio Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill, Administrator Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst Lisa Resnick, Recording Secretary Also Present Tim Hall, Principal,Turrell-Hall &Associates Arielle Poulos,Turrell-Hall &Associates Clam Bay Stakeholders Dave Cook, Pelican Bay Foundation Jim Hoppensteadt,Pelican Bay Foundation Mary Johnson, Pelican Bay Foundation Kathy Worley, Conservancy of Southwest Florida REVISED AGENDA 1. Roll call 2. Agenda approval 3. Audience comments 4. Review edits for Clam Bay NRPA Management Plan 5. Next meeting 6. Other 7. Adjourn ROLL CALL All Committee members were in attendance. AGENDA APPROVAL Mr. Cravens motioned,Mr. Dawson seconded, to approve the agenda as presented. The I motion carried unanimously and agenda approved as presented. Clam Bay Committee-Minutes November 6, 2014 Page 2 AUDIENCE COMMENTS There were no comments received from the audience. REVIEW EDITS FOR CLAM BAY NRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN Ms. O'Brien thanked Ms. Kathy Worley, Ms. Mary Johnson and Mr. Tim Hall for all their efforts in making the Management Plan read as clearly and correctly as possible. The Committee went through the entire Plan,page-by-page, beginning with the Executive Summary,pointing out the previously submitted edits and the most recent edits. Some changes were made on these edits to clarify certain issues,to correct spellings and grammar,to insure compliance with the various requirements, to add references and subtract others where needed, and to substitute certain words for others when a particular meaning or intent could be made clearer. The Committee was mindful of redundancy as well as the need for consistency in certain instances when describing the different habitats throughout the Plan. The Committee discussed the wording"when necessary", "as necessary" and like phrases,which implied a decision by some entity when action is needed. It was agreed that wording would be added to the effect that the PBSD Board would be the entity to determine when necessary action is required as funds are available. The language concerning fresh water input into the Bay and the many considerations associated with it was discussed at length, and the Committee agreed on a few changes in the wording to clarify how and when any action would be taken. The language concerning a Pass closure due to a weather driven event was also discussed at length, and words to the effect that the inlet should be dredged"as soon as possible"were added. The dredging parameters were looked at again, and Ms. Worley,Mr. Hall and Dr. Dabees will confer via telephone on certain, more specific language related to this issue for insertion into the Plan. The Committee also inserted language indicating that after the Plan was approved by the PBSD and the BCC, it will become an integral part of future dredging and other relevant permit applications. The Committee went over the appendices as well, and some minor wording changes were made. Mr. Cravens motioned,Dr. Trecker seconded to approve the amended Plan. The motion I carried unanimously. Clam Bay Committee-Minutes November 6, 2014 Page 3 ADJOURNMENT Mr. Cravens motioned,Dr. Trecker seconded to adjourn. The motion carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 11:44 a.m. Susan O'Brien, Chairman 1/20/2015 10:18:37 AM CLAM BAY MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT ,¢ I. , : � . i iii ., ;;ate 3,, ¢. ; (40.4.-.? , • ft- rte; I O' PL W RSA.. .A �I,' w ��{{ �fR .•. �c, �� ' �� ��: .E� : �� �t� is '+..TG.£1 0.0 �` ,< - .... �G II. t Sr - 'fir u `�1., �,i.dom io l e �4.v...f.. ..� a —4.-31 Y . . ,K : : r ${V� r t '• +t�.# 4, ^�Y�.r`*"L� '0.0,..,.."1 h % i� .� �-. �. fit '-� •,'w.,iI;,..iii !<y`.. n !r si.4 1 f r �� `a �Ai#.4;3 . + # xYRa S4 �,.v.w4 ♦ c 3} .S 4i.:tra+ #0. 4W. 1 f_.-.` ., 4f fa ., s40 tk$ sFy4f4 +�iis :a.".aj ±�.a mss' J"` c :,. i r.1:-.4.} .-'. .06- ata V.I.,,�, 2`"434 .': tr air 1,a 1'r' ,.�i ,e, til.'•jt ;pa ► �d�lJ��/���,fT. //yy ae! ,Ba yr' r� A .. •,:t....' `:rir. t� �. .�.�1.: �w r f+�_��t Z. �1.0� f �Y.'. °t..•-4-1a 3.�. iis l� fi r, BY: TURRELL, HALL 8c,ASSOCIATES, INC. %.,- - fir FOR: THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION DECEMBER 2014 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. December 2014 Introduction The Clam Bay estuarine system is a 560-acre area of sandy beaches,shallow bays,seagrass beds and mangrove forests on the coast of Collier County in southwest Florida. The community of Pelican Bay abuts the northern and eastern edges of the system,while the Seagate and Naples Cay communities abut the southern portion of the system. The Clam Bay estuarine system is an important natural and recreational resource for local residents and visitors. Clam Bay was designated a Natural Resource Protection Area by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County in 1994 (Collier County, 1994) and consists of approximately 360 acres of mangroves and some 130 acres of shallow,open water bays,as well as a 35 acre beachfront parcel(Clam Pass Beach Park).The system consists of three primary bays;Outer Clam Bay(southernmost),Inner Clam Bay(central),and Upper Clam Bay (northernmost), connected by a series of tidal creeks. 44-*..i'" ! le 2,f s • 0 . „nfti , _ t.,.....1.07*-. ,�,! �` � .q , ° + ti:♦ ',, t.mo t. a. � . R M r` is ? ,^ --'1‘,� 04,_- S r i 'j4 .r• =, l �°�4 y S ,..,',:,%',.,',` '� . T WI'liI /s A, 74't�ge V*, .•.,t • . y +ie r - � t. 4 t" j. .i a e . F ° i- A ..IL 0 ,(r_tft . r; ; { / N C A , The entire system receives runoff from adjacent upland and wetland areas. Upper Clam Bay is connected to Inner Clam Bay by a winding narrow creek.Inner Clam Bay is connected to Clam Pass through another narrow creek. Outer Clam Bay is connected to the Gulf of Mexico by a wider creek through Clam Pass. Some water also flows south to Doctor's pass through the culverts under Seagate Drive. Clam Pass is a small,marginally stable inlet that has migrated north and south along the shore over the years. Prior to dredging,average water depths were-1.0'to-2.5'with a width of 30-50' (Collier County, 1994).The Pass remains the primary source of tidal exchange for the Clam Bay system, but it is restricted by sediment deposits just inside the pass and in the long meandering tidal creeks surrounded by mangrove forests. The smaller embayments located primarily to the north of the pass are not subject to normal tidal exchange except during exceptionally high tides. Tidal range is restricted throughout the Clam Bay system (Turrell 1995; Tackney 1996). 1 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. December 2014 The system is bounded on the north by Vanderbilt Beach Road,to the south by Seagate Drive,to the east by the Pelican Bay development and to the west by the Gulf of Mexico. Pelican Bay is predominately a residential community of private single-family homes,as well as both high and low-rise condominium units. The community also includes a golf course,common areas with meeting rooms, tennis courts, beach park facilities, emergency services facilities, and commercial areas with shopping and hotels. The 2,104-acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in 1977 as a partnership between Collier Enterprises and Westinghouse Communities. It was one of the first developments in Florida required to save fragile coastal wetlands and associated ecosystems (Urban Land Institute, 1981). The development of Pelican Bay had a limited impact on the wetlands themselves(approximately 94 acres in total with about 78 of those acres located in the northwestern corner of the property)leaving the mangrove forest intact and preserved around the bays. In 1992 a small area of dead black mangroves was first observed in the northern part of the system. In 1995 a significant area (approximately 50 acres) of dead and dying mangroves was reported(Turrell, 1996). Following the die-off,restorative dredging was proposed to increase tidal flushing by opening up the pass and widening several tidal creeks within the system. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection(permit#0128463-001-JC)and the United States Army Corps of Engineers(permit#199602789(IP-CC)),authorized restoration activities in the Clam Bay system,in an effort to restore the mangrove communities that had died off. The restoration activities permitted by state and federal agency permits required a suite of monitoring activities to assess effects of the work efforts. Those permits expired in 2009 however, the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD), in an effort to remain informed of the condition of the system, and vigilant in their protection of it,pursued new permits in order to continue the maintenance of the flushing channels within the forest areas. Permits were granted by DEP(permit #11-0128463-005)and ACOE(permit#1996-02789)authorizing this activity. Maintenance of the main channel and Clam Pass have been undertaken through a separate permitting process. Like the previous permits,the new permits require annual monitoring of mangrove and other components within the system. This document presents a summary of the mangrove and seagrass monitoring which has taken place within this past year. It also summarizes tidal and water quality data collection that has occurred within this past year. Mangrove Monitoring Methodology The mangrove monitoring undertaken this year was a continuation of monitoring which was initiated under the old permits. The eleven existing Turrell,Hall monitoring plots and eight of the original Lewis mangrove plots were observed again this year. The previously established monitoring procedures were conducted. These included documenting the number and species of trees within the plot, as well as their approximate height. Each monitoring plot is a measured 10m x 10m square staked at each corner and marked in the center with a labeled PVC pipe. Monitoring activities included enumeration and mapping of living and dead trees with diameters at breast height(DBH)recorded for all living trees with a DBH greater than 2.5cm. Seedlings were identified by species and numbers were estimated by count or percent cover (where high numbers make individual enumeration difficult). In 2003, each measured tree was tagged and identified with a plot specific 2 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. December 2014 number to allow for easier tracking of individual trees as well as to allow easier comparisons over time. Any saplings that grow to sufficient size(>2.5cm DBH)between monitoring events are added to the tree counts and receive tags and numbers as well. Photographs are taken and any additional observations,including standing water,wildlife or signs of stress are noted. Time,tide, and prevailing weather conditions were also noted for each survey. Meandering transects were walked throughout the system to inspect stressed areas or to observe areas of concern related by residents of the community or identified through examination of aerial photographs.These surveys are conducted throughout the year as needed.Observations made during these pedestrian transects are noted in the general biological discussion of this report. A photographic timeline was completed again this past year. Concerns expressed by residents led to the establishment of photo points on the roofs of two condominium buildings adjacent to the mangrove area. Quarterly photos are taken from fixed positions on the roof of the Montenero and the Grovesnor condominium buildings. Over time, comparisons can be made of the photographs to determine if any additional die-off or gradual changes are occurring. In years past, scale rectified aerial photographs have been taken of the Clam Bay System by Aerial Cartographics of America. The aerials are produced at 200-scale in both color and infrared versions. Due to personnel changes and inconsistent communication,these photographs were not taken this year. Instead,scale rectified Collier County aerial photography from the property appraiser's office were used in conjunction with oblique photographs taken throughout the year to compare recovery and die-off areas for this annual report. Mangrove Monitoring Results A summary of the 19 monitoring plots have been included on the following pages. Plot discussions, comparative photographs, and tree compositions have been included on each individual plot page. 3 d n Number of live trees o o cn o 01 0 � 0 CD < - " '. .„ ‘ e...:-.- ,''''-A z-°\ - - 1,-.) AD 7 Y .. _ - • ` X11 i� ' �'. Q. � _ CA CA 5e. ' Ili 4 ar4.-'� _ W .e ,, ,..F k,r 4- a, L h O 1 l4'1�. may , t ..4. vi.",t �� X .tl A Y • ,1•. S fir✓:. !• *S,' ,,J# c• 1 44 ' I o • a v 01 N O Q rn 71 . o 3 O A 3 3 O tr C to 1I11HI• D'S c , al, (.14 Va C '-r • t am O„ • �\ ': . -, ky i 4 GN < CD 0 CD a ,-r-, 0 O 0-•AELjr. +/ i !" '!"�' ' te � L O a ,r O VD 0 ' t ° N CD og �:'� ii; .7 " � ' y •!. 6- O 0 C N 0 f W 0 Or f* A) U04 P� '0 Pd N _ . CD O c> tro• w 4: o ¢ O N C -. N GP ' ,� r+ J �$ •ate; . }a C4 CD C 'r• 0 ( j It F1 M O ^. C/4 VV `^ m co O _ ti d c c? Number of live trees N N W a- .- O Cr, O Gi O CJ' O F-1 cC x _ ter " ON to xi !II •f . 1.+�+§' a ��(2 '' 4:.,'Il Q rn 7 rn O. • Go R to •4 't*+, . a 4) f S r'- t . i 777. I. '1 1r , � 1r,.. - `4.;:s�^�r• ',K alt �t t ,.. w ❑ ® 0 V CA N CP O O 91 fl O O 3 O 0 3 ---- -'-' ' k--- '''- .."'•e="4:ViA o 0 -• x CD CD 0 ri- e.) • n • 0 O^ A UQ O O .• '\ ' �' k CL CD r \ ' A ,n dq j. O �''-. r m'--,....s--,....s_. ' CL O�� _ f `C7 • P . y.i �a S-\�• , CD CD v O O O n < O ri- . �1 0 r ��% CD ,, `r R. `. ,C`./ 7•,44,-----.S. "r` a'ir co .t' ° 0 O ,- p C C n O G. — 1 `� ✓�s ='bra - n r o O �.•t c� C73 CCD •• N N s a. vv,i Li, w Number of live trees `r erJ -- N N W 0) -A A p O (.31 0 (31 0 (31 0 (Fl 0 CD a A. Ve t + + y = 1-1 Cra 1�' - : iz. T 73 co (J ,,. '`} +, j! .'�.'�.'Ht+', �'tf L�i{cr(,AgSI, 4j-zE l'. (� - a t o;.yam, .. • \ Yt 4..+fir eli F l ,' i Z4f �. . 0 • O v u, N y 1 (P 0 O 9, n O C) 3 O 0 3 3 OA,-0. O D O O C ,, t r . + ; x, A ` O " O • � N O. R. O {n- : }:- f,, fJ-" • . "t ¢ ( Cr •V - r o D 0 < C �• o O'. .r t r. i O N G Cr 1 C ,..-t't:jam z, cn CD 0.� .mc C \ C4(11:? O r r CD Cl. 6, C.. � \ , ,v ,( O c v CD O O x c CD R 0 11) '0 o. o r` . ,- 3' }vim c cD o W �, �'/— ,..... .i.-. ,,,,Y.--,07-".7 "T �r• () cn (�D O ��3 �.Y vii cD `�' { ~ �_'.)(.rj-+- =` *-`,�. , 'is 6+ 0° "� 6. A) CND 0 C:D �:.. a, O O C `- 2 `-a ��: ,i ,,.a te ~ t QQ O el V1 n 0. CCDD 0 C�i1 (IQ C0D '' E 4 v. t .S O "S t-r fn '3 cn in R. CD 1� 5 aJ.` ty '•# Q•. O CD n"t 4. rte... CD '"r �` Al .r - C .. Al l_!• �.:� CD CD (D CD cm ,,- 8 C P0 • o o a r13.4 o 4'7 `,� o c ° p E. s .f ` t°- `` S b ,`.+Si; ° - Ao o -• P O O• D , 5., g, � O¢ 0 cn :4 U UQ 'CM cn 0 y C) w Number of Live Trees g g . ,y .. r �('.\ Y, o 01 o Cn o VI o N I h -� /� fa CD 2 4 �•. -, 9 cn e 4 , • !' ' a k '' _ - C)' T O ~�' ...r.-Al. •, ` I "FIS ] y 0 y __ , ` R * e''4 ,.. , ,,. ,.1- .-e'"1 ''1,/ , . '' , ...'--- - ' - - 7 i r 9 ;L er , . . , .. .,. . -,„, .„ ...., u,,...-- .. , . .,, • .• .. 4 .., ,. . • • . . .4, ,..,-_, 0 . .•C) °O O 3 C> 3 � I t, ryi .O 0 n K O' a. i �• a r -F O O �p CD a. 1, , 0- C • CD cl-' A', r-r if tF , = 1. '� 1; O O s„....,,,., 4r\\..„ Ny, ,,,,..4., . � • . 4 .f."- `- '-" Up S " z o '" 2 trq ..• O OCQ N N b,. ,%r ' ` \ ,, . t ' N S -(V i , , O t da �, P.FrT H ° +tt 1 1/J,°11'" 14. N' 2 Q- pa 0 x "1 ?" �;'� y WI ri .F , t :.,i'�• 09 Q" CD • O = 0 V, 6 og _ t ,.• cD r h C CD e-4 5 O• J 0 - n Number of live trees c c to -i .- N N W cv O (71 O (n O 01 O "t N aD y, t „.cam_. O =, ? RD G s Is.141 • n r 1 rj,i` ,.../1/ .- _ S L • c f " -:1'11-')a n tJ $i ' 'Nfit o� 13 . i j as m- S ,. ' fir. �( G � . . � ri- ( Air _ ..,- ‘ ., 7,X.:,'1/4-'' ,,,V./..... • ih, r. . .. 1�Z�C'e tr. ,/,.(,...„. Y. t _'r ma c `I' •I A�1 •rte .. O ■ V U1 N iT, O O CM P1 O O 2 O 0 0 3 2 f a n c p, O -,= s. °, O rr Q al „9 O N O, N J t .' ,..r --"'"-74--.- ,,,'0:6• .. ,11,-#.1'f.1...■:',?..: I....- N.' i• .4 -, - u' P C P N C O /mo >1 a ,yn�s: N R. 'Y N C t. 1\-- ,, ,1v ,� .per n p O. C O N o_ - ... ,4 CD o >e o rr•tJ i.:-.t' I ''y. O.. ¢ �' N O `•,,,, a X �n ? , • A± � � w O 0Q-, (n CD A A ,. _.— c 'd`0 O g. O. (ICI) CD 5 O 1111 ID '; Q °A a- 5 `,••,, i )--1.) O. n rt oo 0 C) IV Number of live trees 5 �_ t - -. N N W cr•Jr- 0 O [37 O 01 O N O .-e x _ NO gym. zi s O. Sa. "•-ems^ Pj � s. { J e � tidili Imo, 1.'------;�'S'�p•�4r.. ^�J * , •£� r n 0 73 co 1 jity sit i if- r- \ -, ` 9 .� - T\ 7 As 1 �` p ,+ t ✓• Gt N 3 y 0 O 1 p, n O O 3 O on 3 l�*• . ' ., i O • O cD cD O c)En 4 G e-r CD C w tic?• C 'l7 4a * • "'1 U�Q! CD • n CV p ,,,,,,, „, p I)) CD CD 4 /y5• ✓ Imo! 1 F+ c4 t"r �D A e �4,4- Q\i 4% ..• ,.., , ,„L ,, CD ‘.‹ . '- - —7--- ov ,-, ,,,..„. --„,---..„-wi i ,, f..., 1-- ,,,, .- : -,44# .-:..:,:-.61, • t.. . ,...) ,i. ,„ t, .s O ; G 1 ' � ¢ O• N ue O 4-- r vi ,1 J � i � ...1-. — 4°t.� O - o PD C) 6. 0 v.'-' ', y \'' � i . t , N � ia,5' 5 = 5: ° • ti ~ ` �1 ,-t- '.r. CD : • �- ¢, � NOrO '�S 0 4 ` CD .4'0 d C n Number of live trees 3 s bed r, ,. c p "`_ ..� ' `, - , -�+ a J N w -A. al CA - OP co CD x`.. 1 -, c :: ,•" : i wy 0 E. - 1 5 Dp 4µ S 3 Qi - CM P ea s- H fag O .cam"r'`...' i.::. c, Ca ..i 4 ,4. y-- K.' •_ co umpiiiiiim t CD 0 ti `ila�r,+ yi.k ----�'--,c,., Ate. _ ter. 3 cn C - . V t ° 10. E„,,,,,74,-,„„„ ~ t -Y :;` r • . � i r ay' c _at r , � \ 0 t e`. ,V .- _^T 7 . "1'''. s +� F+i t x - ❑ s V 1 N J — 01 0 O _a p1 n O O 3 0 0 3 3 w 0 `CD o o � Vo\ c o O n n n n n n{ •O UQ C CD N A • o r P\-, %-_ , „..,..,. tl rte- f • Q CD ti C O R.. K ¢ • CD / 1 `4. O 0 n "'1 CD ry c4 iy � `' n• � 7 D O v� O. ___ 1F .. ,. � T yy ..,'F'). v, CS t !oU vi C : D N : -- Q ,•-r C kia , rt vr ., i y %;... µ } �R cn 0 O o 1' z O 0 0. 11'7' CD t "* it— 2 • � Cp ' O O" , t r rr �. 1111111 1191 n 5" cpa e�ry a .y0 ,t Y a_ 'ik AD rC •Cr __6 .4 KU' a ° � +� � CD UQ (PQ S Octv O ,4, CD �. 4. ., �. i.i � ..,, Al , e+ O C y ,-4-0 O Q. ■I CD:, d n CD : w Number of live trees , to -I.D :a D o ❑ = O Ut O-► CJ N O CuT 8 U1 P cn� �r�, * ; Oa i i. „i ^. .1_, ~ N }rt , ,, am � s � i� rik 0:, (j *Z1 CI f t/ ir l i !+ mi � -'?\b. i ;:1., . O • • V CT N J — in O ' , J 91 co n . c, 3 C3 A y7p. 3 if..7.,0' ' ' - ''` * --, '",7'.. -.,"4,1.. '\- -,:t-lx,4.4,..1._,) i:$ '0 tr4 cr. rc 1 ,,,,-4 _ s,r-:'-• ';J, ., ,.4:::;,,, p Iiiu:tIiUfr v � r r�, a pt k< O CD O a'. Cr S -/ 4\ 2 up O O C P c i Op .p =-' t*= •� NO `� I's ':,err—''`_+'`7`• N AD O O •,� SID ∎—• O Cp 0 ' - A ¢ N GL CJ4 n C p C) -- ' 4.ag..K,4' O (./) p S C.L.r - RY T' N y ..∎4 oo a'6.G' O r„ f - I. .1. � ".°s'., ,_,..' 1r , . (gyp �-' < �' ,, C < 0 PD �' 3?. ��„�`,moo` ^- 7" . C• O p 'apt ,-r. A' < O lit 3t`,`�5 s. 9*'gio *r.7 _ -4'.„� (IQ R `C �_ N N vii �' d '- n Number of live trees -� N N 0) C' W O U7 C) 01 O 01 O y ►x ty Po 4, G �any' -,..101,-'17' i s _ ' co T 1 4 f \4 `i`t - (ID . rt t .-1r . ? ti .0 w ELI .- T w€� Z � �r _ra ,? --mac -∎-'7 - 4 1- - ;. '14 r. ■ '': ..1'!:t...'4',.,:: ..S''''f "Y V'.-,,.' ' 'f=4: :' e'77-1411 k ,i4c-!-::, 4,4:-'..-,.., ,.-i...;,,f . , s- •,-'-19/..1;.-ri' -4a 1-t- ;.elltf 1,,.:.,,,:itit....,,ft. ...,A V (T N .s - 0* 0 CD - to n o a 3 - n n 3 s - . r -- _3. n CD CD co*` ' f O UQ (14 ' O,1 z , O O c4 e\ 4k ,...4'.-1:=N-.. t o` � r'� . '� aI . H: fl O O cC��tl } k � , l�, ps r n �. co pO � =, P., ¢C� Y� �4 ! '� � (p'''?!.. .,/,..1:44;;5'..r.i f' O ' O r s. N' • N O a O O ¢w 0 sn C CD ¢ -y + y F e s r St Z cf,ry-`� •'� C V }'d-:-.•,,,i);; 1"'.� '3 `T3 h v) cD r *PC 43•}�! � "�`1 `a',.. 0 C r-F O O = 611 D ' `\, 1, \ Y O cn U4 �C O -s = Rr 0. rr• N C7Hn w Number of live trees th N N W 01 ? �P q:4 o 01 O CJ1 O (h O 01 O (Ti ^1 j z CD 111 y°k CL� j t c + . z��, 2 L I A r� +.;Y. 40'yrCSy �r 1 N t fc� ji j O !y- L S1 {1: to w ,4 ...., a3 Ei - .14' ' 4.1 t„_ s'f3_.?r';;;-'174- 1:,:-__... - -- # , r t' 4„;,,b,.-4--- -fi---""4"'7" 0,e-y:;.z.ve..-,-.. ,' Iiiri__ ryyr , O • • V 0 N J 0 I I o ..... cn 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 - ' . .�. ;sue :F ' €,%k4 s , x,; ,,' �a ' ; 0 pa 10, i„,g-�.�L !c, of .,,- - (JQ O �p Or f _ate •} x ± r I s ( �♦ 1^� rY `h 3 1 7 ) � it ti:, Q fA• 1, CD ,-.4. V] ' p 1 r `. mot r �+s`. �C r• 0 0 C p) . ,-r ~ } eL B � -, -I fr,4.tK, -�. D O v b. , w 0 , 0 G ,-,- CD O*•• � ` 0 t � - o-:K i co p-P ! M s 0• '• ? v»ery t Z''''31 �. ` Li CAD CI- n H "-- 0 N • e. r u' � O m R m z c-D C• n O . cNw C O'-'•H (D O+ fr . �a i .� U,..) _____ d ei n Number of live trees CD -' N N CO N 4..— r a 1 " >� x O CS O (h O Ut O �t `G �' -.a, ,� • -.:yam - ` , a C i .4. 10 } *'=• l © 0 — y . .` • - - OV;`fi; r r 'r. .. '" "" •• � .-`' y i.� % „v•'•„----sue ; L ` N` > ” - . Io W /% i' ,Z1�v t', .' `14. t j .y - - -''» J MF+ -' T""^ - et � j . ram 0 • V CT N -■ 01 O -+ Ul n 0 c) 3 b C7 3 _", ''%. ' V ...., ".,-..7.. , .".),,17.,;,4_ x 0 0 0 cc. Z' cp rn t1r��6 ,i 0 r¢y ' CD O 0 PO GIC:1 $u r s, 1 r (/> c) cep r O 0 0 O D Z n " O N v0 R. ¢ 0 . + CD MI 9 ► . �: i '" �r "`:. O• u> CD FD F o• O z. 2 -• s,ic. -, • yr. n O `� Rr O �� r •;'-: V { i�.' I+I �' O t (iq `r' ¢ n r • O V] 0 V] )-.1)-.1., v) R- R ■-■ rD 5_ a� Tree Totals 1 N cco C p 0 0 8 0 8 x ` o = . ' " T p 2. P 4 � • �• a et, =' ,;,. , 4 ., J a • Wr, a: '. r a / as 3i -Q •per" t i : ç;r 'ti' btt _ •_�1 r N CD ... M çS k< �- i CO r;;...Z.,,,,2•41,:4+ �4 SI' 11 • i coo O AD p 0 -. _UQ ;' 'r.-ti O p `C O O p UQ z O UQ z CD ,- ' I < �•t C O ��p-f O O O a • 9 ca- N CL b+ N� -O r4 O. = 11, (D CD CD A) n 0 CD CA (D 0 CI) vo 8 cD �- 0D —• , CD CD N Q-' 0 '.'.t fD • C7 CD -. O4 va N _�. & P 0 -t CD CCDD vii R. N• CL, Pp v) d ,-.30 0 mg Tree Totals N w = c 0 o S 8 S 8 °° .,r- e N :D > a 4 c c co S. , -..- -Milk • - • -.4404, - - , ' r o r : :• • . te ° rP V: 0 N co CO C) CD UQ H CD PD ■-r• 'y''• CD•rr c- `� "I F CD 0 P) (14 O CCD g Z p. O• 5'c• CD c' O O O D O P C N � b 0 C *0 O O) O O O� �• C CD N (o. =- n PCD ¢ CD CD (D CD N oPo flmii' o O ' O Fp •`C3 0 C C R.•.� AD • 0 ' O O CP O UQ CD O-. cn t7Hn Tree Total ii N 5. VR4 W y4 O I n , ,;, (D A Q. 4i ..r Y• cra.y Y t. .PP fs!??3•' 12 0 1< i . r 0 co N 0 x n N r, O; r-t- c -i Z A) O UQ r+ o O O c o - 1O-) ° ' •n vii • `C 0 317 go vo o -0 C R. o a. a � o w D DD 0 C) tw.'o o 0 w _ o° o o S i CD Tree Totals ,11 1 tz —► N N W W 0 0- 00 o �' �' o x A R* C C.I. P iii 4 O O n O xi w','y ..t eo + N. f4l iyr d y S 7cra ' srli -o--.--i- -- ,, fy' - sX«e rr O rP , 'ti, £ . ,, . ,..:4rig.,. ...74A.,crr:,, . .;,,,I. < — w ET (7 X O o C < O_ cD 5• ', A4 0 a• 2 to o CD O Co CD Ocia 0 5 O' O rn. O O O N c UrP L P N p .? O b� p O o ac) c __ o• O n Q Cl- A H y C _ a- CA to `C 0 co •. Q -. Q.. ,=-r `7 C7 8 O • e9 U4 O.(74 C N CD ,'• O 0 co x d -in Tree Totals ? iz +,.. Qo C o O n = x -t .. k - ./ `.(A l, 4. 4 1'1, ` . . N *=`• ict i,_ h f�S 1,�WSk�,,$3 `•.v h f c 0 1p-' c cn . i ,�, 'Al CD is• n 4:::: , �f c: r y:s . co� r J � i' r ` y W v n 0 Z CD C H " n O.. -s v' cD C,(0) • 0 O Q6 co Q.. 0. "ph O cra al- CD -t CD �Y C -. ?� C pn• UQ )P U4 n Q v '-s _ p p FcD P C ID `C p.-.. CD . b o- p 0 , n O CD CD `' O `t3 5- C O V/4 O CD ,,, O o U4 CP N (D Tree Totals CD c 'S c 2. p 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 o < 4 © O A fp- a�J 0 n i l g,V _ s 0( e•r t. Cr) r _ ...; _ tires CD Y*11 .i F co 0 01 O O CD 7 P ▪ Or CD cn - UQ ▪ �' o N cD Cf4 C C = cr CD $4 O (1)CD CD CD (D CD CD PCn rn O 0O Cl)rn CD s `C3 71' O cD .UU (D N Ar p O fl.. 5 - CD C • p e Cl CD ▪ �. cD O CD (D n "-) CD CD. O �- 5-cn O O O • Sy CD O O' — Cr � a " C- o 5 a _• o^ n n .y W (D O P CPt cr C ▪ n < O c . CD C�t _ Q- c<D (74 � p N CM C-• CD p N O C7 -in Tree Totals 2- t cr Pa 1 4c I• Ii y w n -ra 4 '' 'S+r r: CO O./- A - J -_ ,+ = C> (I' � n 0 H CU O• n UP O. C . '-.O O n Cr . ,fir �' C5 O O - Cf4 Cr v' O < P O �. n kC SID •`_ W VI p C n �S " 0 0- o , a- cn C N CI4 ■-,- O Z-' Og - 0 p - r n N O O O Q. = 0 5 5r-. r'''v, 10 00 C m l p cn O ,$) ''B 0 CD CJ4 Ap 0 0 O.. 0- P pt C) O" ' cr`C Q.. CD Cr CD O 0 N Tree Totals 9 '2... c t) -, -, N N co co - 0 t< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NO D i .r A $20 C li U r , f: - p j''a ,a k.+411. •-.Q■#R-tie I[[[PPP::: p cie• k ' � 1 r.'l+ is ET N c CO { �i ra `, (D D it: . r _ - GO 0) C) x- P 'a O P v) 0 c, 5 CD 0 O A) fD "s Sv C) 9• . cig ra. 6' CD CD`Y - p, C 2 VQ ¢• or S ,-- O co CD 0 .Y < co o 't C3 cu b ) 2. ~ ¢ 4 )a O 00 CM -a f) p) C)co < 6' o �t, CD 0 CD C) C m = CD f H q Cn . C u O � = P rrn CD < < v, N N O 1-h W i (D cn R.. N N Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Condominium Roof Photos Montenero Roof November 2014 Montenero Roof December 2013 23 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 • Grosvenor Roof November 2014 Grosvenor Roof December 2013 24 vow Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 As a result of an observation of boring beetles attacking stressed trees in the early months of 2011 we began to capture photographs of Clam Bay from the rooftops of the Montenero and the Grosvenor. These panoramic pictures of the mangrove system are taken quarterly for comparison purposes. In addition to the annual mangrove monitoring these photos allow us to more frequently assess the overall health of the system and better identify and address any potential problem areas. Seagrass Monitoring Methodology Seagrasses are a valuable biotic indicator of environmental health and the PBSD has recognized the value in maintaining viable conditions for seagrass growth. The original permitted dredging design entailed impacts to seagrasses within the channel between Outer Clam Bay and Clam Pass. Monitoring over the life of the permit was designed to allow documentation of the regeneration or loss of seagrasses within the system and follow the effect of increased tidal flushing on seagrass aerial coverage and density within the potentially affected beds. These monitoring practices have continued in order to further document the overall health of the Clam Bay system. Monitoring methods include examination of aerial photographs and ground truthing by in-water and wading surveys. Accurate estimation of seagrass coverage is primarily hampered by visibility. The type of seagrass and limited visibility make estimation through examination of aerial photographs almost impossible. The most effective survey technique has been diving and wading transects and the most effective time has been at low tides when shallow water and substrate exposure make coverage estimation easier. Best effort was made to overcome the visibility obstacles in those areas that were deeper. Due to the ephemeral nature of the grasses being monitored,the survey methodology has been slightly modified from what was originally permitted in the 1998 permits. It was noted early on that the seagrasses shifted in location from year to year and that fixed quadrats in the same location year after year did not accurately depict seagrass coverage or presence within the Bay. More general observations of the presence of grasses along these transects have been used to locate the grass beds with the quadrat measurements used to quantify coverage within those areas where grasses are found. Grass beds in or adjacent to these transects are then mapped with a handheld GPS unit(Garmin Monterra) and transferred to an aerial exhibit. 25 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Seagrass Results Outer Clam Bay:Transect 1 Transect 1 was surveyed with snorkeling gear in water depths from 2 to 4 ft. Visibility was approximately 4 to 10 inches and again was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. Shoal grass (Halodule beaudettei) was found within quadrats 2, 4, 5, and 6 along this transect. The general area of grasses along this transect remained consistent with the last couple of years and has expanded slightly from the original pre-dredge monitoring. Densities of grasses remain consistent throughout with some minor losses but additional gains when compared to last year's monitoring period. In addition to the grasses, numerous southern hard clams (Mercenaria campechiensis), oysters (Crassostrea virginica) were also observed closer to the mangrove fringe line. Oyster clumps(approximately 6 inches by 6 inches),upside- down jellyfish (Cassiopeia xamachana), lightning whelks(Busycon contrarium),Florida fighting conchs (Strombus alatus),shell debris,and red,green and brown algae(Rhodophyta,Chlorophyta,and Phaeophyta) were also observed along Transect 1. Transect 1 80% - 70% 70% - 60% 60% - L a) 50% - 0 0 40% - 30% 30% 20% 20% - 11 10% - 0% 0% not � r 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1-6) 26 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Outer Clam Bay:Transect 2 Transect 2 was also surveyed via snorkeling gear. Water depths ranged from 1" to 3 ft. with visibility approximately 2 to 6 inches and again like Transect 1 this was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. No seagrasses were observed along half of this transect but shoal grass (Halodule beaudettei)was found on the other half. This is an improvement when compared to last year's monitoring period and reflects percentages that have been documented in past years. These grasses are ephemeral in nature and slight changes in water clarity and temperature have considerable effects on these grasses causing them to be present one year and not the next. There were also some southern hard clams (Mercenaria campechiensis), oysters (Crassostrea virginica), and lightning whelks (Busycon contrarium) that were observed along this transect. Transect 2 100% — 90% 90% - 0 80% - L 70% - 60% - 50% c 50% - c 40% - 30% v 30% - `m 20% - a 10% - 0% 0% 0% 0% r 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1-6) 27 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Outer Clam Bay: southwest sector, Transect 3 Transect 3 was surveyed with mask and snorkel gear. Water depths ranged from approximately 2 to 6 feet. Visibility varied between 12 to 24 inches. The patch of turtle grass(Thalassia testudinum)was observed along the western mangrove fringe line as it has in years past. This patch has been observed in the same location for the past several years and this year has slightly decreased in it overall density but still remains in good condition. The patch would still be considered small however hasn't grown in density and the blades remain approximately 4 to 12 inches long. In addition to the grass, both blue-green and red algae were present within the shallows.There was also a lot of Caulerpa present in and around this transect area. Other observations made along this transect included the Florida fighting conch(Strombus alatus),upside-down jellyfish(Cassiopeia xamachana)and a few scattered oysters(Crassostrea virginica)right along the fringe line of the mangroves. Transect 3 20% - 18% - 16% - i 14% - 12% - U 10% - 8% v 6% _ 5% 5% st 4% - a. o 2/0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1-7) 28 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Western side of waterway between pass and bay,Transect 4 Transect 4 was surveyed by both wading and snorkeling due to the varying water depths. Water depths ranged from 6 inches to 5 ft. with visibility of approximately 12 to 24 inches. The survey was conducted during an incoming tide. Again large patches of shoal grass(Halodule beaudettei)were observed along the western mangrove fringe line,and throughout most of this transect. Oysters were once again observed along the mangrove fringes on both east and west sides of the channel. Blue crabs(Callinectes sapidus),southern hard clams (Mercenaria campechiensis), and lightning whelks (Busycon contrarium) were observed scattered throughout this transect. Several fish species such as mangrove snapper(Lutjanus griseus),mullet (Mugil cephalus),and sheepshead(Archosargus probatocephalus)were also observed. Transect 4 80% ._,_ - 70% - 60% - 50% 50% 40% 40% 40% 0 40% - 4 30% - 20% 25% 20% - 10% °- 10% - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quadrat Numbers (1-9) 29 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Turtle grass(Thalassia testudinum) (Transect 3) Shoal grass (Halodule beaudettei) 30 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Eastern side of waterway between pass and bay, Transect 5 Transect 5 was surveyed by both wading and snorkeling due to the same varying water depths as transect 4 has.Depths ranged from exposed substrate to 6 feet. In the original monitoring efforts,both shoal grass and paddle grass had been observed along this transect. As the tidal prism changed with the dredging activities, areas where grass had been present became subject to longer periods of exposure and some of the grasses died out. Shoal grass (Halodule beaudettei) was observed along this transect,however compared to last year's density and overall coverage there has been a slight decrease,however we feel this is just due to the ephemeral nature these seagrasses have. Shoal grass covers the majority of the mud flat along the eastern shoreline indicating the surrounding bay area could be fully recovered from the historic dredging impacts. Mud snails were observed throughout as well as Florida fighting conchs(Strombus alatus)were also seen scattered throughout the entire transects. Further continued monitoring will indicate if the return is permanent or not. Transect 5 90% 80% 80% - 70% - 60% - 50% p 50% - 40% - aci 30% 20% 20% t 20% - 10% C- 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% r T 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quadrat Numbers (1-9) 31 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 e +, Shoal Grass(Halodule beaudettei) (Transect 5) } ; Y i ii - 4 r ` M1 a 1‘ Irik Shoal Grass (Halodule beaudettei) 32 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Inner Pass, shoal area east of Clam Pass,Transect 6 Transect 6 is oriented north to south and covers a large portion of the shoal area just east of the Pass.This transect was surveyed by wading on account of the very shallow water depths which ranged from exposed substrate to approximately 4-6 inches. Visibility was not impaired. Large amounts of shoal grass(Halodule beaudettei)were observed scattered throughout the entire southern end of the flat,around quadrats 1,2,3,4, 5,and 6. Compared to last year the size and density of this large bed has remained about the same with the overall footprint changing slightly. The main change in coverage on this transect from past monitoring periods is that the grasses seem to have shifted more towards the southern half of this transect. Densities seem to have stayed about the same indicating a healthy thriving bed. Remaining portions of this transect consist of a sandy sediment with green mat algae, mud snails, and Florida fighting conchs(Strombus alatus). Transect 6 70% --- 60% 60% 60% 60% - L 50% - m 40% C 40% - U 30% - 20% MN 20% - L 0- 10% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Quadrat Numbers (1-8) 33 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Inner Pass, shoal area east of Clam Pass,Transect 7 Transect 7 is oriented northeast to southwest and covers a large portion of the southern half of the shoal area just east of the Pass.This transect like T6 was surveyed by wading and snorkeling due to the varying water depths which ranged from exposed substrate to approximately 3-feet. Visibility was not impaired. Large amounts of shoal grass(Halodule beaudettei)were observed in the vicinity of the mangrove island,around quadrats 3 through 5. The large bed present is in the same location as the past few years though the density of coverage has remained about the same. Densities seem to have remained the same over the past few monitoring periods, indicating the net improvement for this transect and surrounding area has remained. Transect 7 70% 60% 60% 60% - 50% 50% - a) 0 40% - 30% - c c.) 20% - 10% 10% 10% El- 10o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Quadrat Numbers (1-6) 34 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Inner Pass, southern section of channel and shoal area, Transect 8 Like T7,Transect 8 is oriented northeast to southwest and crosses both the channel and the two shoal areas just east of the pass. The survey of this transect was conducted by both wading and snorkeling the survey line.Water depths ranged from exposed substrate to 4-5 feet with a visibility approximately 2 to 3 feet in the deeper portion of the channel. Shoal grass (Halodule beaudettei) was observed on the east side of the channel in the shallower water depths,in the same areas as previous monitoring periods. This seagrass bed has changed shape and density since the original monitoring efforts.The small patch of shoal grass observed two years ago on the west side of the channel was observed again this year,most likely due to sand build-up causing this area to just about dry up during low tides. Large groups of mud snails,a few Florida fighting conchs(Strombus alatus),and small patches of algae were also observed. Transect 8 50% 45% - 40% - L 35% - 30% - v 25% - 20% 20% c 20% - 15% v 15% - 10% x 10% - 5% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1-6) 35 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Seagrass Summary Seagrass coverage overall totaled approximately 2.85 acres along the monitored transects within the Clam Bay system. What has been shown by the past thirteen years monitoring is that there was a decrease in the monitored seagrass beds immediately following the initial(1999)dredging activities.This decrease appears to have stabilized around 2004 or 2005 and has reversed in the past few years to where the grass beds are re- establishing previous areas and new areas appropriate for the grasses (in terms of water depths and light penetration) are being colonized. Future monitoring of the seagrasses will be conducted to see if this trend continues. Water Loggers Three continuous water level monitoring loggers were deployed in the system this year. These instruments help us to see how water levels within the mangrove forest react to tides and storm events. The graph below shows the water levels within the forest in comparison to the rainfall recorded within Pelican Bay during the same time period. 2013-2014 Rainfall Data 20 18 1 16 1 14 . 12 10 1. •1 1. 8 6 4 4.14 . 2.63._ 2,65 2. 2 ._. `1.04 —1.3 1. 1.= ,- '. 0 0.25 �`� e �+ met 7)013 2014 36 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 WELL AT NORTH END OF CLAM BAY 4.50 4.25 I Mill 4.00 Y 3.75 3.50 — - - - litft 3.25 3.00 ... 2.75 A iti 2.50 •W 2.25 2.00 Lu A rill ., ffi 1.75 --- 1.50 — 1.25 1.00 F 0.75 * — _ 0.50 r L. Ilk 0.25 L *I " k 0.00 I, T 11 WHIN li 1 . 1!I A 11 1 • -0.25 -------------------------------------- -------- -------------------- ----------------- -0.50 co 2...o. 1 s.. , ..., ....„ 14•-.. ......Ig ..... ......1g ......V ...... ......V at it At., = = 1 = = MJ-., e-• co 4.0 WELL 7 IN MIDDLE OF CLAM BAY 1.00 7 0.75 _________ _ I Y I 0 Ili• 0.50 g.I ff- 0.25 I — 11)1111 .1 I u, kr 1 ci I II ill I 1 : -I Ill t i .00 ----- -0.25 1 i 4111-1- •1 • Elkilkij*/ 1 • i -0.50 4...... e-• a ...... ....„ .....,... ...... ...... M M ....... en ,......g g .....g 1-. cr. g ......° I-. ....... .... ....... ..-... M M M F. A I-. A I-. A ....... I•4 A 37 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 WELL AT THE SOUTH END OF CLAM BAY 1.25 ----._....._..._..__..... ..._........_.__..__........_.._.._.. 1.00 ------ .-.-. .---.- --.-- .---- 0.55 0.50 ---®� 0.25 -- �-- (.-........._...... – -- ff 0.00 -0.25 0.50 1111 11111111111T it 0.75 a _1.00 '1.25 Twin Mit I ai , 1.50 .� - ���� -1.75 _ Li ' f 11111111 11111111 _2.00 —._ -2.25 -- The fluctuations in levels depicted shows that the system does receive elevated water levels after heavy rainfall events but quickly returns to normal levels. This is an indication that the water flow and flushing capacity of the system is still functional. Tide Gauges The tidal data and flushing analysis for the bays and main waterways within the system is presented under separate cover in a report from Humiston and Moore Engineers. Water Quality Testing Water quality sampling is conducted within the Clam Bay system on a monthly basis. Occasionally certain stations do not have enough water to sample,so those dates will not reference data for the various parameters. Three (3) stations: F. St. Lucia(berm), W-7 (north boardwalk),and PB-13 (north berm),were blocked in the fall of 2014 by construction. Water quality samples are collected by PBSD staff and transported to the Collier County Pollution Control laboratory for processing. All of the sampling data are not included in this report due to volume of pages making up this information.Sampling information is available for review and inspection at the PBSD offices. Field notes,chain of custody records,and laboratory reports are included in this data set.Of the parameters sampled and collected, dissolved oxygen(DO), Total Nitrogen(TN), Total Phosphorus (TP), copper (Cu), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), calcium (Ca), Lead (Pb), Magnesium (Mg), and Zinc (Zn) are 38 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 discussed below. Discussion on these parameters is provided because they are the most indicative of nutrient loading and other potential water quality problems. The enclosed graphs show monthly measurements in the discussed parameters over the last year. Total Nitrogen (TN) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Maximum Contaminant (Name) Units Level(MCL) Level(MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class Ill waters(fresh) Measures the sum of Nitrate,Nitrite and Total Kjeldahl TN Nitrogen for a more complete picture of Nitrogen in a Total Nitrogen mg/L N/A N/A water system. High levels indicate the potential for algal bloom. Total Nitrogen is the sum of Nitrate, Nitrite and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen measurements used for a more complete picture of the nitrogen stressors in an aquatic system. Nitrogen in a water or soil system can influence the system in both positive and negative ways. Nitrogen is important to both natural bacterial and plant growth. In larger quantities, nitrogen can also stimulate significant algal or plankton blooms, which can reduce the amount of oxygenated water and potentially cause blood diseases in fish and humans. Nitrate Nitrate (NO3) is highly soluble in water, relatively stable, and feeds the microscopic organisms that fish consume. It is the most oxidized and abundant form of inorganic nitrogen in water and the most concerning for health reasons. It can be dangerous in high concentrations, because it can cause blood oxygen deficiencies when it is converted internally to nitrite. While nitrate is much less toxic than ammonia or nitrite,high levels can inhibit growth,impair the immune system and cause stress in some aquatic species.In most cases of excess nitrate concentrations, the principle pathway of entering aquatic systems is through surface runoff from agricultural or landscaped areas which have received excess nitrate fertilizer. These levels of nitrate can also lead to algae blooms, and when nutrients become limiting (such as potassium, phosphate or nitrate) then eutrophication can occur. As well as leading to water anoxia(lack of oxygen),these blooms may cause other changes to ecosystem function, favoring some groups of organisms over others. Natural levels of nitrate in freshwater seldom exceed 0.1 mg/L, but waters influenced by human activity normally contain up to 5 mg/L as N with levels over 5 mg/L as N indicating pollution by animal or human waste or fertilizer runoff. All marine nitrate measurements were all below 0.1 mg/L and approximately 50%of the freshwater samples below 0.1 mg/L at the various berm stations. The highest reading was 0.71 mg/L at F. St. Lucia in July 2014. Nitrite Nitrite(NO2)is a less stable form of inorganic nitrogen,which quickly is converted to nitrate by bacteria. When oxygen levels in water get low,nitrate can be turned back to nitrite. Plants convert nitrate to nitrite and then to nitrogen gas ultimately in the Nitrogen cycle. Nitrite is a concern for drinking water because it has the ability to change the oxygen carrying hemoglobin to methemoglobin, which does not carry oxygen and can cause Blue Baby Syndrome in infants who lack the enzymes adults carry to convert it back to hemoglobin. EPA has established a regulatory limit of 1 mg/L of Nitrite in drinking water, but there is not a limit in water bodies. 39 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 All Nitrite measurements taken were well below the regulatory limit for drinking water (1 mg/L), with the highest spikes reaching 0.018 mg/L for both marine and freshwater stations and the averages far below 0.018 mg/L. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) is the measurement of organically bound nitrogen, ammonia (NO3) and ammonium(NO4+). TKN is typically the parameter used for measuring nitrogen levels in wastewater;however it is also used in soil and water analysis. The National Estuarine Eutrophication Survey classifies water samples containing greater than 1 mg/L TKN as high,samples containing between 0.1 and 1 mg/l as moderate and those containing less than 0.1 mg/1 as low in TKN. Of the measurements taken since October 2013,4%fell into what is considered a low TKN range,72%were in the moderate range and 24%were in the high range. Marine Samples-TN: Upper Clam Bay appears to consistently have the highest nitrogen accumulations of the marine sampling stations,which is to be expected since it is at the terminal end of the system and flushes the least. Levels in Upper Clam Bay are frequently twice that of other stations and remain higher throughout the year with or without heavy rainfall to frequently drive the levels. There was one(1)higher spike at W-1 (South Clam Bay) in March,which could possibly be influenced by particularly heavy February rains. 40 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 TOTAL NITROGEN •WELL 6 ■WELL 7 € WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY •N SEAGATE 1.800 1.700 - 1.600 — 1.500 1.400 1.300 1.200 1.100 1.000 o%0.900 — E 0.800 — 0.700 - — 0.600 l,' — 3 0.500 , — 0.400 -- - — rt., r `" 0.300 ' — 1: , e'' ': 0.200 l: i , 0.100 us „ , I 0.000 O z v `- i 3 g 3 3 c t K' o Z W W A A A A a F+ A A W is AI.' A A Berm Samples-TN: F. St. Lucia station had the highest spikes of any freshwater sampling locations, in some cases three (3) times the amount of other samples. The next highest levels were taken from PB-13 (north berm) and Pb-11 (south berm). Glenview consistently had the lowest Total Nitrogen levels sampled. 41 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 TOTAL NITROGEN •PEi-11 13F ST LUCIA •PEI-13 GLENVIE W 4.000 WM__ MIIIIIIIIIII____-__ 3.800 M _____________ 3.600 rimmill _ A3.400 � I __________ 3.000 _ _I ____ I_ 2.000 1 �. : 1 al2.800 2.600 _ �� I _ ___ 2.400 _ __ MM II M�_______ J 2.200 n • 0 __ __________EMIPM Do 2.000 IIIIII E 1.800 _ El 111 III __ ____-_-_-_ 1.600 _ __ ___ __ _M__ _!!�____ 1.400 ■ 7_ _ _ __ MI � • �U 111 111 ■ 1.200 r; _ _■iru __ �_ I_ __• or ••___� 1.000 ■ ■ ■ I !� _r ■r_I'_I 7 ■ I mm 1 0.800 I I I I I I _I 0.600 1 I I 1 1 1 11 1 rim I I I _I 0.400 I 11 1 1 I 11 11 _I I I 1 _I o:�o I I 1111 III IUI1II I II I i =ii 0 Z v ' TA 3:3: s t c g o W W w A A A A A A A A A A A Total Phosphorus (TP) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class Ill waters(fresh) In no case shall the nutrient In no case shall the nutrient Measures total of all phosphorus TP concentrations be altered to concentrations be altered to forms. Total Phosphorus mg, cause an imbalance in cause an imbalance in High levels indicate potential for algal natural populations natural populations bloom. The total phosphorus test measures all the forms of phosphorus in a sample (orthophosphate, condensed phosphate,and organic phosphate).This is accomplished by first"digesting"(heating and acidifying)the sample to convert all the other forms to orthophosphate before measuring. An acceptable range for Total Phosphorus in water bodies is between 0.01 mg/L and 0.04 mg/L. There are no official standards for phosphorus, but the USEPA suggests a 0.1 mg/L maximum to prevent accelerated eutrophication.The National Estuarine Eutrophication Survey classifies samples with over 0.1 mg/L phosphorus as high,and samples with 0.01 to 0.1 mg/L as moderate in phosphorus content.Those samples under 0.01 mg/L are classified as low in phosphorus content. Natural concentrations of phosphorus in surface waters usually range from 0.005 to 0.020 mg/L,but phosphorus is normally found at concentrations less than 0.01 mg/L in high quality surface waters. 42 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Total Phosphorus only occurred within the 0.01 to 0.04 mg/L range 14% of the time from October 2013 to November 2014, but within 0.01 to 0.1 mg/L 61% of the time. The highest reading was 0.98 mg/L at F. St. Lucia(November 2013). Upper Clam Bay had the highest total phosphorus levels of any measured marine locations consistently,with one exception during the October 2014 sampling event where W-1 depicted a spike significantly above its average. Upper Clam Bay also had an unusually high spike in April 2014, where no great changes can be detected in water temperature or salinity that might indicate an unexpected input. TOTAL PHOSPHORUS ATP) •WELL 6 WELL 7 WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY •N SEAGATE 0.30 n 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.26 _ _ . 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 i l 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 i= ���` `0.16 c 0.15 E 0.14 A 0.13 - s� 0.12 I♦ MI l_ 0.11 - t 0.10 _ MN II VP 0.08 �'y 0.07 � � : ziIf .__.._-MP 0.05 4 off al g ' I �.1 a' i ni -il � >� N 1 II ! 11l II i : . M 1`.' i p I lI 1} 0.00 ,.._.____.__ 0 z v 5 a3i 3 v�' c w w w a .~p A p I-. A A A .~p A Most Total Phosphorus readings along the berms were in a consistent range of 0.05 to 0.11 mg/L,with a few slightly higher peaks at PB-13 (north berm),and several significantly higher peaks at F.St.Lucia in October and November of 2013 and February and July of 2014. 43 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (TP) ■PB-11 t F ST.LUCIA PB-13 •GLENVIEW 1.00 0 MIII -----����� 0.95 / --- -- - 0.90 0 al 1-----����� 0.85 0— -_— -------��- 0.80 g$ ;-�_ , -----���_� 0.75 0 -�� 0.70 0' 1111 -�� - 0.65 All-;--- - 0.60 !I'- --- " - . 0.55 IAN --- -MI IIMI �-- 0.50 � III - / -- ---- ----- E 0.45 All ?- PIM 0.40 21101111VINION r 11111111111111111—�I -��-- 0.35 ►I M -__ - ---I IN 0.30 l'', -- - NM 1E111 IEEE 0.25 PI -I a-_ - -1i - I ME -�--- 0.20 /K -I -� ■.,-I -� I'-I� ---�� 0.15 rl !iv ii, , --i mu- - -ii-l. T r -1m 0.10 � ■�;� '� ��' � � �■ �� -I�` ■ r��� I 1 rr�0.05 1 r • t ' 110 0.00 y S T Fr N .g 0 7 IC C 0 Z 7 p, W U„ W d' A A la A A is A A A Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class Ill waters(fresh) DO Not less than 5.0 in a 24 Measures the quantity of oxygen in the Dissolved mg/L hr period,and never less Not less than 5.0 water. Low levels indicate potential for algal Oxygen than 4.0 bloom. Dissolved oxygen (DO) is a measurement of the available oxygen in the water for aerobic organisms to use. Oxygen enters the water from the atmosphere and as a by-product of photosynthesis taking place under the water. Oxygen is removed from the water by respiration processes and decomposition of organic material. Typically, DO levels are directly related to a host of environmental factors. If there are too many primary producing organisms,plants,fish,or too much decomposition,then the oxygen demand increases greatly and thus the available oxygen decreases. Temperature is also one of the major influences of DO measurements. As the temperature increases, the photosynthetic activity taking place increases, using available oxygen. As a result, colder months typically have higher DO levels than summer months. Increased nutrient loading in water bodies can also lead to an increase in the oxygen demand, and thus a decrease in the overall health of the system. Both DEP and EPA recommend Dissolved Oxygen levels not fall below 5.0 mg/L for the health of aquatic 44 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall& Associates,Inc. January 2014 species in fresh water and for salt water not average less than 5.0 mg/L in a 24-hour period or fall below 4.0 mg/L. The levels of DO measured for this reporting event only provide a snapshot of the daily DO cycle. Dissolved Oxygen can fluctuate considerably throughout the day and thus a 24-hour diel study would be required to ascertain a true measurement of Dissolved Oxygen at each well station. Marine Samples-DO: W-6,nearest Clam Pass tends to have the highest Dissolved Oxygen levels of any sampling locations,followed closely by W-1,near the parking lot canoe launch,and North Seagate. Surprisingly Upper Clam Bay and W-7, found in Middle Clam Bay, each had a few high spikes as well indicating good water exchange is occurring during the late fall and winter months. DISSOLVED OXYGEN (DO) ■W-6 •W-7 w W-1 UPPER CLAM BAY •N SEAGATE LOWEST ALLOWED-MARINE 8.40 0 8.10 7.80 7.50 7.20 in 6.90 6.60 o 6.30 / 6.00 5.70 5.40 1• I NO I / MNII T1• 510 1.= I � ■ ■ � i � �� 4.80 �_ ILI • U5 5 ■ . r.. 7 .1 . 4.20 minim,. N ■ • U ' . IIN • X1'1 E3.90 1� ■ 11 I ■ -< 11 ■ 3.60 I ■ 1 I I — ' 1 I ■ 330 4 ■ II II 7 , 11 ■ ■ ■ 3.002 ] I ( ' MN ■ uli NI `I j 1 I IN 1 1 E N 11 1 1 1 MI NI I ' I I I 1I I S I I NI 1N! I l I I I I A A ea ea y1 A A A "A " During periods when water temperatures were higher,most of the stations registered readings below the desired threshold of 5.0 mg/L and the limit of 4.0 mg/L,however when water temperatures went down,those readings rose overall. From October 2013 to November 2014, each well/bay was analyzed for the percentage of months where the Dissolve Oxygen levels were at or above the 4.0 mg/L threshold and the percentage of months they were below 45 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 the threshold to better assess where issues might lie within the system. With the exception of Upper Clam Bay, all marine samples taken were predominantly above the low limit of 4.0 mg/L. DO Levels (October 2013-November 2014) Frequency Above and Below Allowed Thresholds for Marine Systems Sampling Location Measurements>4.0 mg/L Measurements<4.0 mg/L W-6(Mid-bdwalk) 79% 21% W-7(North bdwalk) 78% 22% W-1(S Clam Bay) 64% 36% UPPER CLAM BAY 31% 69% N SEAGATE 71% 29% Berm Samples- DO: PB-13 (north berm)shows the most consistently high Dissolved Oxygen readings of any berm sampling stations, followed closely by PB-11 (south berm), near the Commons. As is typical,DO levels increased in the winter months and decreased in the summer months. Readings at Stations F. St. Lucia and Glenview had the overall lowest levels of DO. DISSOLVED OXYGEN (DO) ■PB-11 il F ST.LUCIA PB-13 GLENVIEW LOWEST ALLOWED-FRESH 930 O_— = -__����∎��� 9.00 /�I� MI •ll�����l��l��� 5.70 /�� MN •->_������i�� 910 .0�- M -�1 -�������� ��- ME ��1, ��������� 7.50 vN�� EM •�1. ••�������r� 7.0 %�- I i I NI MN -�������1 MO 6.60 P4�� I.In II •I,NMI 1��������1 1/ 6.30 a�� I NI I !T'MIN E;OEN.—������1 IIIN 6.00 �r— I NI I ■ II 1111 MOIL�������I 5.70 �— 1 Er I ■ 1 1�1 m°:I—��'�� m �� ow 5.40 �MEM, I It ■ Il M1 IN If��1 �rt•���1 NO 5.10 �1 1 I"r I'/�'I .711 1� 1 FW !'�! 1 4.50 0 i 1 1 11 1 nil 1: ■ ■�1 ■I ■ ■ ■ i 1 ■0.4 I 1 I • I, • i'- 1 1> • ■1: •1 • • • 1 • E 4.20 s I I I III; 11 1 I N I: 1 ■r` 1 ■ ■ ■ 1 1 III 3.90 t • II I. 1 I= I 1 II I; ■ 1, II MI MI • ;'■ • ' 1 s • 3.60 • a I' i I? 1 1 1 I a G 1 I ■1 ■I • • 1• I'1 • 3.0o i Q h II i I 11, I ■ I. II ■I ; • ■ II � • • 2.70 NI 11 : I N : al :'7' ■I N • I • • 2.40 II- NI II NI II NI: NI 1I ■! II 7 1 1 • 2.10 111 1 NI 11. NI 1I, 11 II= 1I 11. ■! . 1 , 1 I II • 1.3041 I I P 1 I • I, III' • I 1 I. IIII II i 1 • • ■ II NI, 1111. ■ I • II NI II ■I 1 1 1 1 , ■ 1'S0 / 11 1P 1l 11' 1 11 NI: 11 ■i ` 1 ■ I 1 : ■ 0:990 0 or ■ 1, ■ 1� NI • ; ■ I. F1 ■ 1 I • 1 • 1 • 1 1 • 14 l Ili N 1 I" I` 1 1 1 II 11 1 1 • 0.30 2 1 I, N 1; NI 1, 1 1 ;I I I;; 1 1 1 , 1 1 to 1 s ■ ; ■ 0.00 . , . �, �_ O z o k-m 3 .g 3 t t t r 0 z A + A W W W A A b A 1A� A A A A 46 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 DO Levels(October 2013-November 2014) Frequency Above and Below Allowed Thresholds for Freshwater Systems Sampling Location Measurements>5.0 mg/L Measurements<5.0 mg/L PB-11(South berm) 36% 64% F. ST. LUCIA 14% 86% PB-13 (North berm) 64% 36% GLENVIEW 8% 92% Copper(Cu) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class Ill waters(fresh) Cu Measure surface water arsenic levels Copper µg/L <3.7 <3.7 for aquatic floral/faunal health reasons. Copper (Cu) is naturally occuring in small quantities, but primarily enters waterbodies from wastewater discharge, herbicides and fungicides. Copper is measured in Pelican Bay primarily due to the use of Copper Sulfates in lakes to eradicate or control alge and aquatic weeds. Past stormwater lake testing has shown high to extremely high copper levels are present frequently,so downstream sampling in the surface water management system and in the estuary are important in gauging the future health of the system. Oddly,W-6,which is nearest the pass and has the best seawater exchange of any station,has the highest spike of marine-measured copper at a hundred times the limit. Upper Clam Bay measured the second highest spike. Remaining samples were closer to the limit of 3.7 µg/L, but were still frequently found at twice that level. 47 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 COPPER WELL 6 WELL 7 WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY N SEAGATE — — Limit-Marine 328.00 - 303.00 278.00 ' 253.00 - 228.00 203.00 - to 178.00 • /I\\ to = 153.00 128.00 103.00 78.00 53.00 28.00 3.00 - _ _ i �N O O Z Z 0 0 O ®� p�� T T E 3 .g 3 3, C C C C C g g ° 'O 2 R °c °c ,,, fi F. S ' Q 8- N a) a 7 7 7 . as F+ N W W W W W W W A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A W W _ 48 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 COPPER (Lower Levels) WELL 6 WELL? WELL 1 ---«- UPPER CLAM BAY N SEAGATE — — Limit-Marine 28.00 Mil Em. SIN sm. ... I I. 26.00 ��1_MUM —MI HIM It�_�M= 26.00 (l.. Noon�.. I♦�=___1 - � 24.00 lig ME —M NEM_1�_��� 24.00 i� i��� —� MM. 1�_MEM= 23.00 (�iu�ME��—� �fIIIIIIIM I= � M= 21.00 uIN____ —� l��_If___��� 21.00 111 MINIM __ I����� 20.00 �"____ IfIIIfII�� MEMIM_MN_MEM 19.00 r..___M__H___,____= 17.00 �u =W MUM= UM NMI / 16.00 maw. ®I♦I_��_��= 16.00 00 ■N���= �III�_ I_ �� 14.00 ������ MIN�11� ��1M 13.00 Ilan MEI ��11�1�1�_��� 13.00 , -- _-__ -- - 11.00 :�� . �2� i1__ IC_��� 11.00 I �� —���I�� l_____♦ 10.00 N MEM �\�/\\�� 1��M�= 8.00 w r��M _—III ILIW I �M� 7.00 ` ;--� �ARNI♦ I == ,` 6.00 : L 1...- .� I—,��—�—�1� .� 5.00 - al A-1MUMMI�� 1. 4.00 7r- ...�'7C ®. ��i� ►' 11r-fir`_ — —I—.. _ti,�•- 3.00 D go' ig O O Z Z m O k . r T g C s(' a v S3 ? g n $ ' 0- & m ® o % 7 > > .4-, 7 p p 15 `j ' . . 4., , A A r.+ F+ A A A A F+ A A W W W W w w W W W A A A . A A A A A A A .. Berm readings all considerably higher than the limit of 3.7 p.g/L, with readings as high as 898 tg/L at Pb-11 (south berm). Most readings were 20-30 times higher than the allowed limit. Since the berm sampling stations are part of the stormwater system, it does appear that the system must be working though since the extreme levels of Copper found at the berm stations is typically not found anywhere in the marine system comparitively. There has also been an increasing trend in marine organisms found during the annual monitoring events as well. 49 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 COPPER PEI-11 F ST.LUCIA -P8-13 GLEIWIEW • • Unlit-Fresh 903.00 853.00 803.00 753.00 703.00 653.00 603.00 553.00 503.00 .4 453.03 d. 403.00 I 353.00 303.00 253.00 203.00 4/ 153.00 103.00 N - c 53.00 _ ■ i 3.00 1 h_ --. _—/ - ! ---*� if i' ° ? ° g F R g 5 i g : m $ $ v m > > ` `c e p w W W W . ~ W W w A A d A A ~ A d 4 N .~A A A A % ►a F+ W W A A A A A A A 50 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 COPPER(Lower Levels) PB-11 F ST.LUCIA ---PB-13 GLEIWIEW — — Umit-Fresh 183.00 1 I I 1 Ell II����� 183.00 173.00 -����� 153.00 •11 .. I .- 153.00 143.00 I /HIM 111111111•MI IIM 123.00 m�_ MEN ���� 113.00 +�_ MEMO �����1. MEM 111111111111111111111 193.00 Ma 1/11111M11111 IN����� 93.00 I■ /1���'L' `` ����� 83.00 Ili ��111-�1 ���� 73.00 111 ....1'� �,�,�I•�•1 63.00 1111 , 111111111 1,, /lIIIi __23.00 . " V —---- — ' III 13.00 - 1 �w� � . Mill 3.00 .I' Mimi w o o z z v v v T T Y,' 3g .� .g 3 3 c c c cc egg' W N N ~ M I. A A A A A A A W W W W W W W W A rA T. .ii: ii: A A A A Arsenic (As) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class III waters(fresh) As µg/L <50 <50 Measure surface water arsenic levels Arsenic — — for human health reasons. Arsenic(As)occurs naturally in our environment,but can be released further from man-made disturbances. It is also found in paints, dyes, soaps, fertilizers, drugs and metals. Higher arsenic levels tend to be found in groundwater as opposed to surface water. Arsenic can cause a wide array of severe health issues in humans and animals so a water quality standard was implemented for both Class II saline and Class III non-saline surface waters of < 50 .tg/L. A 10 µg/L arsenic limit was also established for drinking water. As can be seen below the vast majority of arsenic readings were below the lowest detectable limit the lab can analyze(4.0µg/L). There were a few detectable spikes at Wells 1,6 and 7 and North Seagate,but they were still more than five (5) times lower than the limit. The highest reading (7.78 .ig/L) was taken at W-6 (middle boardwalk) in June 2014. None of the berm readings were above the lab detectable limit so that table was not included for reference since there would be no graph. 51 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 ARSENIC •WELL 6 •WELL 7 ri WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY •N SEAGATE 8.00 0 7.75 7.50 7.25 7.00 6.75 6.50 — 6.25 4 006.00 5.75 5.50 5.25 5.00 4.75 4.50 " 4.251 iR I11I 4.00 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Cadmium(Cd) Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level Parameter Label Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample (Name) Class II waters(saline) Class III waters(fresh) Cd µg/L <9.3 <9.3 Measure surface water cadmium Cadmium — — levels for human health reasons. Cadminum(Cd)is a minor natural constituent of surface and groundwater,but typically enters the water colum from a point source or non-point source discharge;typically sludges and fertilizers. Cadmium can typically be found varying from 0.005 to 0.11 gg/L naturally in seawater, with higher levels in certain coastal areas, according to the World Health Organization(WHO). Cadmium(Cd)has a limit in both fresh and saline environments of 9.3 gg/L.,while the drinking water limit of Cadmium is 5 gg/L. The Collier County Lab cannot detect Cadmium below 2.0 gg/L and none of the samples for any station, marine or freshwater, were within a measurable range. 52 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 CADMIUM •WELL 6 s P8-11 ®F ST LUCIA PB-13 •WELL 7 •GLENVIEW WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY N SEAGATE •UMIT 9.5 9.0 8.0 7.5 0 --7.0 6.5 6.0 • 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 0 3.0 2.5 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Calcium(Ca2) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class Ill waters(fresh) Ca Part of water hardness measurement Calcium mg/L N/A N/A and potentially indicator of fertilizer. Calcium (Ca) is found typically in levels of 400 mg/L in seawater, with a wider range of 1 to 100 mg/L in freshwater. Primarily Calcium is introduced as the base rock dissolves,but it is also released from fertilizers. Calcium is an important determinant of water hardness and it functions as a pH stablizer. It is also important for bone and teeth growth. Water hardness influences aquatic organisms concerning metal toxicity.In softer water membrane permeability in the gills is increased. Calcium also competes with other ions for binding spots in the gills. Consequently, hard water better protects fishes from direct metal uptake. In saline samples,Calcium was typically around the expected quantity of 400 mg/L except in a few samples. It was also slightly below typical for freshwater in all but three(3)samples at PB-13 (north berm),which is also the station which shows evidence of freshwater and saltwater mixing. 53 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 CALCIUM (Ca2) ■WELL 6 s WELL 7 La WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY ■N SEAGATE ■TYPMARINE 500.0 475.0 ' 450.0 i[pi ill 425.0 400.0 _ 375.0 'I I . . 1 . I r I , 1 U M 350.0 01 I ■ ■ I I< I I 1 _ I ■ r 11 325.0 II I ■ i 1. __ A ,I 11 _ 1 300.0 $I I • ! 1 - I I I n1 275.0 0 � I I 1 _ 11 1 1 1 E 250.0 _ I ; I 1 I I I 225.0 C U ; _ 1= i I � 11 1111 200.0 ] a I _ I 1 :1 11 ■ 11 175.0 $ ■ ■ i 1 C 1 I ■ 11 1 11 150.0 ■ ® • _ I it, 111 ■ 11 125.0 $ I I, _ I: I • ■ 1 1 ■ 1 1 100.00 , C r 1 ; I i, ill c 1 i C I . _ 11 1 50.0 I • _ 1 1 III ■ I 25.0 ■ a, I„ { : III II III I Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sap-14 54 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 CALCIUM (Ca2) •P 8-11 •F ST LUCIA •P 13-13 i< GLENVIEW •Lowest Limit-fresh •Typ Upper Limit-Fresh 310.0 0■11 ■••••=1•10.7M ■_ ______I_1_1_IIr��•1•••• 300.0 0■��■� ��11111•111•11111•11•11111•11111111•11111 290.0 0•1111111•11•111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111•111111•11•11111111111111111111111111111111� 280.0 0�� �I• �_�_∎_�__ i 0.0 0-■■■� •I• ME���� 250.0 /■111MONIMMINMEMiniiiiiMIr MiiiiMMENNIMENINMENNON 240.0 0NINNIMIN■■■■•■=1 IMMIOMIMMMMHOMNMMMIMMIMMIIIMNMIMNMI 230.0 /IMMININ■1•11....■•■ MONUMM■IMMINNIMMENNEMMENNMI 220.0 01■111111■Mi■iiiiiii......i. iiiiiMINUMMINEMINNI■iiiiliiiiii 210.0 0MMIMNMMMMMMMMMMM=MlMNMMMMMM I♦■INNEMOMMENNE■ 200.0 0.....1■1■11......1 MIIMMNNMMMIMNMMMMI■IMMNMIMMI 190.0 0 •_r_�_• ' E_- 11•11111111111111111111111111111•••11111• • 170.0 0 • • • • MO. ••••••••••■••■••••••••■ ;171160.0 0��r• �I• ����� 150.0 0■■11■IM- NM= 1■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIININIIIIIII■11111111•1111111 140.0 011111111•1111•1111111111111111111111 MINIM ■•111111•1111111 • • 130.0 /nMEN ��a,MN- ���-■ 120.0 0 1111111. 1111•11•1111■1•■ 110.0 0IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111•- 111111111111•111•111111 111111•111111111111■1 100.0 011111111111r1111111117• M - - - U_- U mmomr7mmor7 90.0 gam- ■ol usi ■m N ■n Ns no IN ■m NI ■imm ■EM1111111 ■1111111MI ■ 80.0 0• MI ■r MI ION NI ■11110 NI ■_ IN N!• - ■EE 111111 ■■ M ■11111111111 • 70.0 0An ■ ■r' ■ NMI I• ■ _. * 1� NI ■■ t• ■� NI ■■ M ■� • 60.001 ■ ■ 111111 • •11 •1 ■ ■ ■ ■ 1• ■P ■ Erg I• ■P � ■.� ■ 50.0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ '7 ■ ■ 1111111 •111111 ■ ■I ■ � ■I ■ ■ ■I � ■ ■ 40.0 0 ■ U U UU 1111 ■ UU ■ - ■I ■ ■I ■ ■ ■I ■ IUI - ■ ■ 30.001 ■ ■ I■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ MI MI ■ ■I ■ ■I ■ ■ ■I M ■ ■ 20.001 ■ ■ ■ ■ 111 • ■ ■ ■ ■ M ■I :EMI ■ ■1 ■ ■ ■I ■ ■ 10.0 •� • •■ • f■ • ■ ■ !� ■1 ■ tl z■ �I ■ �I ■ • 0.0 - Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 (Magnesium Mn) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class Ill waters(fresh) - Mn m L N/A N/A Part of water hardness measurement Magnesium g/ and potentially indicator of fertilizer. Magnesium(Mn)naturally occrs in the soil and rock substrate and can be released into the water column from breakdown of those;however it also can be introduced through fertilizer application. Mangesium,plays a role in water hardness and is required for plant and human tissue function. Magnesium in typical marine waters is 1,300 mg/L, while freshwater streams and rivers typically have approximately 3.99 mg/L of Mg present. Marine samples in Pelican Bay were on the lower side of typical marine Mg values, while freshwater samples were on the high side. PB-13 (north berm) samples were extremely high for freshwater,but low for saline environments. PB-13 has shown other relationships in terms of water quality to a more saline system, so some level of mixing must be occuring at this station. 55 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall& Associates,Inc. January 2014 MAGNESIUM ■WELL 6 1.3 WELL 7 r`=WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY •N SEAGATE 118 Typical-Marine 1,450.0 _� 1,350.0 �� ��MIME� 1,300.0 I♦ 711111111r1It11INIU7MIEF■MINV7 1111-11111111-1 1,250.0 N ■ ■ ■ 7 ■ rte ■ NM ■IIIIMI ■ MI ■MMO ■ 1,200.0 ■ MOM NMI ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ NI MI= ■ MI ■MMOIN ■ 1,150.0 ■ ■1! ■ '� ■ ■ • ■ nil ■I•� ■ Mr ■� ■ 1,100.0 / ■� ■ _ ■ ■ • I • •■ • • VII ■� ■ 1,050.0 ■ ■ rli ■ N o ■ ■ MI ■ ■ ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1,000.0 ■ ■ ■ ■ N ■ ■ ■ C II 01111111111111111MI 950.0 I I 1 1 U O N O ■ IllimmillOIONINIII 900.0 ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ is ■ ■ . ■ ■ r ■ ■ri ■ 850.0 N I 1 1 1 1 1 1 O N ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■NI ■ ■ soo.o I X O n ■ Ilk, ■ S ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■r7 ■ ■ 750.0 ■ ■ M O B ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E 700.0 ■ ■ ■ ■I< ■ C ■ ■ 11111111 650.0 • ■ ■ ■I: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 600.0 ■ ■ ■ • • ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 550.0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 500.0 • ■ ■ ■ III ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 450.0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 400.0 • ■ ■ ■ ■ x ■ ■ I I I I I I 350.0 w ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 300.0 ■ ■ ■ I N ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ ■ 250.0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 200.0 0 ■ I I■ ■ I ■ ■ I I I Ella 150.0 0 ■ • ■ ■ ■I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 100.0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I ■ III ■ ■_I ■ 50 0 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 MAGNESIUM •P8-11 HF ST.LUCIA Li P 13-13 GLEIMEW 850.0 800.0 750.0 700.0 650.0 600.0 550.0 500.0 , <450.0 I 00 E400.0 350.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 ' 150.0 100.0 50.0 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Lead (Pb) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class Ill waters(fresh) Pb Measure surface water lead levels for Lead µg/L <8.5 <8.5 human health reasons. Lead was below the detectable limits in all but one(1)marine sample(W-6-March 2014). Due to the severity of the spike and general change in quantity as compared to the rest of the year, one would expect there was some form of release near this station in March. Zinc was also found at this station in abnormally high quanitities during the sampling period as well. No other reportable samples were taken at any time throughout the year in any of the marine or freshwater stations. 57 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall& Associates,Inc. January 2014 LEAD •WELL 6 •PB-11 •F ST LUCIA P&13 •WELL 7 •GLEIWIEW 3 WELL 1 UPPER CLAM BAY N SEAGATE •LIMIT 9.00 0 1 - ii_ : 3.50 0 3.00 ( ....""""° ' .,R,r✓ r/— Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Zinc (Zn) Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) Units (MCL) (MCL) Purpose of Sample Class II waters(saline) Class III waters(fresh) Zn µg/L <86 <86 Measure surface water zinc levels to Zinc — — monitor inputs levels. Zinc(Zn) is found in fertilizers, fungicides,pesticides, and from oil and tire residue on roadways. Zinc ranges typically found in saltwater are between 0.99 and 4.99 .tg/L,while levels in freshwater vary from 4.99 to 9.98 tg/L. Measurements were within those parameters the majority of the time at marine stations, but less of the time in freshwater stations. Zinc(Zn)reported throughout the year varied quite a bit,however no sample ever came close to the limit of 86 .tg/L. As reported with lead,there was an abnormally high spike for W-6 in March(2014)and an additional one in May(2014)for North Seagate. In terms of freshwater samples,PB-1 1 (south berm)had one(1)large notable spike in January 2014. 58 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 ZINC •WELL 6 t WELL 7 u WELL 1 ■UPPER CLAM BAY e N SEAGATE 20.00 d - — — – – ------ _�_—_—. ---- 19.00 18.00 17.00 16.00 15.00 14.00 a 13.00 ' en 12.00 11.00 10.00 1 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 I P • MI 5.00 i f ' , -.' 'r `-7 4.00 7 _ y� 7 T I. 3 C . g N .N A .e. A A A 1r+ A A A 59 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 ZINC •PB-11 e F ST LUCIA t PB-13 GLENVIE W 28.00 26.00 24.00 22.00 20.00 15.00 "k 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 E A A a A Parameter Label Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level (Name) (MCL)Class II waters(saline) (MCL)Class III waters(fresh) Purpose of Sample A variable that influences many water pH <8.5&>6.5 <8.5&>6.5 quality sampling results. For reference in analyses. Seawater pH levels typically vary between 7.5 and 8.4, while freshwater can vary signficantly depending on point-souce and nonpoint-source pollutants. The pH can also affect many different water quality parameters sampled in the Clam Bay and Berm systems, so it is used as a reference to check for causes in notably high spikes or low dips. 60 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 pH WELL 6 WELL 7 WELL 1 --v UPPER CLAM BAY —N SEAGATE —Highest Allowable-Marine 8.75 8.50 — 8.25 8.00 7.75 ,._____,_ 7.50 \,\ --..„ , , 6.75 r` 6.50 - f 6.25 6.00 5.75 5.50 5.25 5.00 i 4.75 ii W W W A A A A A A A A A A pH -PB-11 F Si LUCIA PB-13 -GLENVIEW Highest Allowable-Fresh Lowest Allowable-Fresh 8.75 8.50 8.25 8.00 7.75 7.50 , 7.25 7.00 6.75 6.50 J 6.25 — ' — — 6.00 5.75 5.50 — 5.25 5.00 ■ r -- 0 z 0 3 g 3 c c N 0 z W W W A A A A 1-+ A A A A A A A 61 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turret!,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Salinity Parameter Label Units Maximum Contaminant Level Maximum Contaminant Level Purpose of Sample (Name) (MCL)Class II waters(saline) (MCL)Class III waters(fresh) Typical salinity levels for the Gulf of Salinity ppt Not more than 10%above N/A Mexico are around 35 ppt. For verifying natural background the movement of stormwater or intrusion of saltwater in the system. Since open marine water body salinity runs in the lower to mid-30s(parts per thousand),examination of salinity levels throughout the Clam Bay system will verify whether freshwater inputs are able to flush quickly enough to prevent mangrove decline. It also serves to verify that saltwater is not intruding into the interior lakes and water management systems to any concerning degree. Overall salinity levels dropped by nearly half during the rainy season,with the exception of Upper Clam Bay which remains a little lower and plumets during the rainy season. A notable observation is the salinity levels at PB-13 (north berm). All other berm and condominium sampling station had very low salinity levels typical of freshwater systems. Based on the data, PB-13 must receive some level of flushing. SALINITY -WELL 6 WELL 7 WELL 1 — UPPER CLAM BAY -N SEAGATE - - -TYP SEAWATER PEI-13 36.00 'IZLIMINIZIM.PIr•_�r''Mi'J "I5'�iiic0=i0r■Ql 34.00 3100 all �EMMI�I���� I �► IRM��� MW 3000 1111 EIMESVIIIIIIMMINIMMIEWfil 26.00 24.00 11�1.�11� 11��„�,�.�11011.1` MEN 22.00 ����/�,\_.����■11MU � ~a 0 EX„�M� MEME���WI�M,M �� 1`,ME 20.0 �� �� 11/11111 18.00 16.00 VAMMNMENIIMP,.BIAIIIIENWE 1111111EUR 1 12.00 4.00 iliIiHUiuIiiiIiiiuiliHii 1 ,S64...0007 2.00 0 0 2 Z v v 6- 6- 'n T' 3 3 3 .g .g 3 3 t c` c`_ c`_ g g ie �' 0 0 Z 9. W W W W W A A A A Si: A A Al A A A A A A A A A A A A A 62 Clam Bay Annual Monitoring Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. January 2014 Summary Since the issuance of the permits(DEP permit#11-0128463-005 and ACOE permit#1996-02789)authorizing the maintenance activities in 2009 the restoration successes realized within the mangrove forest of Clam Bay have been continued. The majority of the monitoring plots show continued increases in mangrove numbers and sizes though many of them are starting to level off. Two plots(Plots 4 and 9)have been consistently hampered by exotic vegetation and dense ground cover growth. Ongoing exotic eradication activities will allow for the eventual re-establishment of natural native vegetative community within these areas. Another plot(#11)has started to transition from a white mangrove dominated area to a more open black and red mangrove area. As a result, many of the sapling white mangroves have died off in the preceding few years. This is a natural progression and we expect to see everything level off in the next couple of years. Quarterly panoramic photograph now being incorporated into our monitoring of the Clam Bay System are shot from the rooftops of the Montenero and the Grosvenor high-rises. The elevated vantage point allows for a more frequent, broad assessment of the mangrove area and allows us to better assess resident's concerns regarding mangrove health when they are raised. The photographic comparisons from this year to years past show little observable changes though the white mangroves that had been killed by the boring beetles a few years ago are still visible. Water quality monitoring conducted this year will be the final effort utilizing the past parameters and monitoring locations. Based on the updated management plan that has been under review,an increased number of locations within the bays will be sampled and a slightly modified suite of parameters will be sampled. Please see the Clam Bay NRPA Management Plan for the new locations and additional details on the future monitoring efforts. Over time the hope is to document improvements within the Clam Bay waters associated with water quality improvement activities being undertaken within the development. Annual inspection of the flushing cuts throughout the system will be continued. These cuts are vital to the continued health of the system and must be maintained so that the water flows and flushing capabilities within the mangrove forest is protected. All canoe trail markers were replaced this year due to extensive damage of the previous marker's piles by marine borers. The new markers were installed with different pilings and those pilings were wrapped with PVC in an effort to extend their lifespan by offering additional protection from the marine borers. Periodic inspections will be undertaken to make sure the poles remain viable. Catastrophic failure of several of the tidal data loggers this year has led to an effort to replace the outdated equipment with updated,real time data sensors. These new loggers are expected to be in place during the first quarter of 2015 and will provide the data needed to monitor the Pass and interior Bay and Creek connections to insure tidal flushing remains sufficient to maintain the health of the system. This year's monitoring has shown that the system continues to recover and both mangrove and seagrass recruitment have been documented though continued vigilance is called for to maintain a viable functioning ecosystem at Clam Bay. The upcoming year is expected to be a busy one due to implementation of the new Clam Bay NRPA Management Plan, installation of new tidal data loggers, implementation of a new water _ quality monitoring program,and application for new long term permits for maintenance dredging of Clam Pass. - 63 a it IP -' zL ar' w..,.., S E ,i1. 1 'W^ 0 t.,. �� "-- rS ' 9 . '!' TT, ai, 4 Q Y t K c.--N s r 0 t 'F A. a I s - &_ tt.`r.- `wwy ' ,r i nat + }'_,w'� � i y t,,;, Q ._...,try _ _ L_ wa .s« 3.,__,:_:_i_4._1 < I s,gyp I- N cn Ca �°"•* "^+z1 i•,a- s. 1:11,6),,,,ss1'��'a.r` ell. -.,,k, III ! _ -.—�. _! 1i a 'r''1, +i t I F -,O'l y e - 'a°+la b ._'1, 3 y`a III L -.1; N 3 ....�..., ;os s+s ° :i• Edw�' «•""_ St .1 !�' r �� < j ..."'r' e 4 .- g${g f€ l x '{_t cAr _� ; e a ^e,+ w.Ir. ..Bt_ J. tI � ,Nm-,,.. s, �cry?r�! \ rry F~) a.. Ol Priu •BB- F. I YPA� yi t , -?`.r n'.' !. �r N _I:_.qt . _[4 - - •' `� i/14 i e'" a__�-- ss/ w m w .. z F. ,; .[.V.: I I o z r h 3 w z w a 1 I „ o o � V I wW ma a z �a Ca € w J G c=!7a QO _ O 0, w rill az V I w � zj J 0 0 W F- r Y 2O ~ 1 II a ��-1 a v CO e viii -r O = O ~ Owa v � X J i w °w - � W ill ao v az IL1` 0 N N Z Z Z � Z 0 w W p W Q Z 0 D � F- r \ 8 �a P 3 p(JNN W ~, z =-w M W �- F— Q g� �a 4M y O m m Q A A A N gO 7.- �c� N " W w ow ! ��it LL ¢ § z I� F. ; .� > II ccs // � m -• A,,,,,,,,_.,,„_ ,` '. W 0. su` -i�� G.."3/oz I. oho 1 I M O � = rl��r ag - GAF of r�xi o I � E C .I►R: w ce a z c ww -,a DO CO a ,000S1,40.., r7 p19845 clam bay\DRAWINGS\SHEET\MONITORING REPORT\2014\MONITORING_REPORT_2014.Awg LOCATION MAP 12/16/2014 RANDI JONES k k Mt J j `� F f * tt *iit` n ' 0 I 'I'll < ix S '' i...7,..* t z 1-- „_, , ,._.; ,„,... ... ,.... .,,e, •.,.. ul. 1 ca 2 t ' '-- ,,,,,..-,- :.,,, •,,,s .,:-., 4 er.4...., Ic_f t... . • . .. ..,. 4., d +. N` �' '+ y, '. •'.a-` Y` 't Q ?• 0 L1.1 It4to 6-7.x s yA �' k. r +� _ I (A - A { ,gyp ,r' � i e I u) ,• • - .�3 amt* Il „ r .�..1 E t44,--up.� s t F � 1, lii,'1. • f,,ham [ p ? y \�,� •Y r! o 2 , 1 . „.3,..,,,,:.e.,.., .._ .. 4,'..L'7t.'.15..2;:.%rillb 4' ' ''' ' '' '' .N•. . , itti., CV v t y� a�7 i� �(�,, �' ` Gk �-,:L CO fi rn� �ee�da� th1 ;E:5 i a, A *`3 .1., Al 7.:"- ..1.- V F . a r 4'i• s ;..�`- Z4 L ,4.}',a ' `P^.•S f ,fir' pis r�rL r y .• ". 0 M .4 'r z,.. 47,,'-441.z..--, Imo+ .R,"!i'°-r'`'_` y • •'k , c, t a'. ":,7 ' . ' ' • : ". ., ;le-Frc'tk SN 4't- ?'2A. „.4._ ,•-_,,,,... ., • 4- :7..;,;_:' •. . tie el 1 ' 4 .',J , - , t 5E �iM '. •� ,,f. • 'r' .!^!' ,. "k 2 i y[ ~ O m� i ;j. q � �G. y"�i:-...::-.1,7, -..'C'''' ! 72C)"=' CI'''L ��"3 r t ‹1 ` j7 ,� t !o 3 f .4..;t:. a 73 y. c c l''!:'-',:,:.'- Q r�I.Ci l f I. ` g `v J Jk` }�gy .y ,$2! - + w} �i 1���s q\} t a r �$ f 4 E . pR i ,-z ! a�p 09,:l. ,i;),,r1.:.f.•;:. 1*--k., ,* ipw •,, 7 41114..,--,,.., Ala .04 , \„;.- • ,,,,..,, J-r ., ,, . v,`,......, ;_, ,_ .._ -,-.:_‘,),..v. . .',.'• CI /0" 'I O 'i i' a N . 1 W.,.,,,,,.. . .,...... . .. , . : .....,e,r.. . in 1*.ic j,±) ) r)f •%,;''' ' .`4 ...)..t;', , .. „. .. . , . , . .. ._ . 0_ z „., /„.,.. . ... . fI it -„n ., J •w S Z �: W a vt INIOL 0 Its t N .„ .., , .:,..t ,..„: Z y .. t' IFIBIP1 IIIIIIIU .1* e i S 1 z ,J ., 3.-#, x .r, r},� i 0 . Hilli ri-u ,* ift VI, , ' --- ,g. . —..'.,‘ • ".. \\\ ' rg } `',,=< is• t le 1( F_CO i p . tie. -._ .'.' .; ,. 4or , ..l',ri . -- 't-, .tee Y i ,1,47.-.1,0!-- J w 0^• :.:1':' ':'.2•L Z daaA �f�1 • _' - LL 41,:k _ ... ..... 2 : .„......„ ,.„., ,.... ,... s , . ,4. -,.., , . .., . ,...., . . . .,,,,.. ..„ ,. , ......,,,,..,,, ,,, lic.,: .... ., • .... , . . ,_ i (( co: i . ,, , . , .; , ,,,,- .... ..„,. „..._.........,....: „: ...„. „...., . „,...,,....,,,.. . . ..., .,.. _ , .2, :,.:„ . .,,, . * ). ' '''• ' ,- ' ': .,• -.- '-' ... 4,4 „,,,,1\4 ,,;- ::'''.1,--.;.--. 14: (-: ' ;, '• -. .'''' --**71-i7;-..\ ' 4--:"...; W h 0 •GIs p L, c)un : 7,,,,,,,,; • ,..4-.: ,,,,v— ilittitc.,.0..,:4:6, .....„ •,_ ..- * r x. \q ' t t - f'. 't � o ' .J .-C-.C1.---:� r 1 41 t . �Suyy,, zl. # . t` )� ,'')...:7: ,...,c,,,....,'-'-- eS E—'is -.A'.4 ; At. ,. ...- ,-,:. ;, �� }i, �• �,0 4'. far i' z, !^� §� W 1, . �.'..'. .ti....4-'via ... :+ .1'.4' `-.�.�-.,��f'r^„ 1 '3.r 6 ,C. 1. a,':. .. ` w N....... \� ,,4 %.., ' 'car f Si / �ttrT°Ft /(y'R f in ,$;>‘' '..r.:e'''.:.2.4 'A . . k•Nir . " 4}._ • it Le Et LO CO •.:•'' . - 1111. 001 w i . 00ac, CD ' 1y 3v s s t N ,; ost . u ',w, N N N N N !illilli Z r :..� a ¢\ ii!10 ' ' •te`' i ...',4 -1"i' A 4", 416:1# .-' ..:0- . .•,,!;•4 , TA* • r• •• ' ' : • 4 -, w to ` ;s ' '''*et. • .‘"9'-' ' "" * .4 4f4,' ' - I • ' yi -0 1. r .t. . ;r :,_•'.:-? '„z;r. Y�1;\'t,* ..5 i. fi , -- '.7 I; r'Aitia'. ')Oli;A''*.;i...4 . .,;'-,- /,,,I,,,,411`,' : ,'-,';,:' L'.;. , .. '.; ”,S ...V:41., X.r.',t ,,,,,i,:• . ,,,,,,, . :,, ,I.;-.• 1,, 1.L,----b.' -4-'- - '-,,','. " ' .�.p(. • �'? �'`liF 21- r'l� y' , _f ,!i��• Jam ; ;r r ,. v �'. LLJ aY �?hvi t `mss, �' ; ' �� Z I,,...„_ .. �, .s�. a r \: *1 �y , V i 1 Ay . -,,,,,, ,, ,f ,.. 1 ,:*,.., t A 1 itr3 -*-- ! _..., -,. . . ,,,,-,7,-• -;(,:.,... • ,i.,..07,it. isr,1,_-,?.-r r •%• I r , • ,.., . .,, L -.r. 04-2 .12_,._44 g - 7,.:,' *:',..;:-!:. 0 4 ? y r 7jj,"�J +9 X t �, y: , . ..... „ ..,.„ „ ,...,.... , ,,"ii -. ,-,.'-.. ' ''- ''1:.,iiit.; .'1'...!4". ,''r*,'..f ,0 ,. Ali 010-:,....1160:1 ,,,k, C.)"ail r.,^i J' ri �''V �'' 'tom ''-- .r g .D�6' d *. 1_�• , ; : > 7 i . 'I. 1:`• Cam°' PC . 0,,,,?,42-.........iii1:-71,',.. -._- .4-..,, _ ,7.,:,,, .:Hiliter.l...tr. . ,....;,40.40,' Mi `F x 7 Q a / o 2 ' 'Q w 'it: � "ss S .1 ,.yx: . " tf � I t �<L ` i. .. r� t Y + 1 iC . ; 1� + p y• dfr).,,P.' ..;:t..J,, ,40,..,, ,,,-:I f - ,c•-•,,r,--ci••A -.IVRAWFIL VA-t 111/1 k t r . I� .s 1 s 1 ti a,r Li A w In LN o a �7 r r F f < E Z w r m 0' 1 E , y '1 XFrV J O t9 rn 4 o o r Q J O +�- � `f ' O O U I- a o Sjc; 7� s.. .�c f� Lo a R O 111111 . k 1 m e:,c N ,_ F. w 00 + N co dw; i \ I W Is' „ r I '''' : --* i..,..%0', tit44,1 . r U 6 , (E ttl 1 III C9) I �y W a....,. .. ,....A...„ , . .,..„... ,...,.> cK 1 L(.1.-ID ,..„....,,, ,, ,......,,,p;, . „ ..,. . 1 O UI CC I O �� f .r, 1 M i G co t \ 1. .1-E-in" ° • , , ;- H j '"y /. 'o'' ' f o _ * f"� f 1:17) O p0 !:::- m M r 0 LLJ>< • { `. CAN N 1 \iite‘ , N.I /✓'- �r 1111 0 co •.? F . . ,... • liair tk, . {` ,, y � k rte JtiS1 i,`k N W II.. CV o k . , _ co 6 W n a w p:\9845 clam bay1DRAWINGS1SHEET\MONITORING REPORT\2014\MONITORING_REPORT_2014.dwg SRS 12/16/2014 RAND!JONES Viiii,fcAilai.7 %. „•*"*",.- t.t , e i . . w 4 c r fi W �, N rYTgya�. 3�p { � , t1? O O Z i.::]x.: F!t-. Ali? -t"�,,,k "'! t ! !3.1„:d'd `°@':� .f I= Q O ,. � • z IIIM 110000 . r o z t +ttr � T' r �v ,, At1+P tv ',r 1'F, ,r- s � _� r ,� , �. '' ' . 3 R ¢ co 100000 o ;10,. ,,,,,71,,, ,,j4t . c, ;;,-,,.....F.,&-x vj ,,t1,•„' 1 ,3 1,,,cr, ,iv , ..f -, r\..A.,--.-- -,i !� r 11111[ ' 1∎ 3 th'a t; 1%-,.. ,r-1,1"%( � S• 4g. ZK W .104 '. tom .. -1‘.-',,r' �,, 4011, d� U ri! a 1 ',� '+ �T elf� �` �' QJ tiF, r i LLJ j4 �'� i .'` �►\ �l *� N '!n SQL 1 5 u),RAJ '.� b �� R: .: ! � c 1F 41, TrF 1 �iT v� f y SYY� r m �' g it re, , ; Ti �. � � � ~ • 0 1 „„lif ti. ' ': n� tP ~ ° �v] w c U �S t tQ � � �14 ' 1!= S � `-, I ,.a FrPp ( ,�` j' • 1 tHO 4-r , a * I y�:r lr�r 1 � z � � i a7r 1 fF F p lilt) r:rs- S• j « 'I+ r . 7 0 0- Of s' ;-"-:'...-- '47 4 6tt's.'',,.1-4:4`;'^, ir- .01,10:11;�i G £�M '1ft,x +� rx � co .. L �' ,�. 1 ^" t �i "` T '€,; [ fi r:' I •� ; o 3 Pk►''. a 4 o foe tad .v '[��. i" k� '°' aK f� d t�,: + J _ slit -":"4•41''y t 4 -Of r� ri: y K, �o��qq'� .�•... 1- ! i tip 1 ,...,_< h„ c f:„ Information on the option of PBSD having a full-time scientist on staff I talked with Amy Lyberg, and Bill Lorenz,who serve as Collier County's Human Resources Director and Engineering and Natural Resources Director, respectively. There are several current County positions that may be similar to what PBSD may determine it needs. These positions provide information on both how the County outlines job expectations and compensation levels. These positions include Environmental Specialist,Principal,a grade 21 position, and Environmental Specialist,Senior a grade 18 position. Attached is information about 2015 salary ranges for various grades in the County. Ms. Lyberg said using+35% is a good way to calculate the estimated cost of the County's benefit package. Also attached is the County's job description for the Environmental Specialist, Principal that could possibly be used to develop a job description for a PBSD-based scientist position. Mr. Lorenz said his department is in the process of hiring an environmental specialist, and he seemed pleased with the quality of the applicants and quantity (about 20) of the applications. He stated that the County's pay scale is slightly higher than the State of Florida's so some of the applicants were current State employees with very good and relevant experience. Ms. Lyberg said that the County is currently updating its comparative salary study so that County salaries remain competitive in the region. Mr. Lorenz also said that the PBSD may be able to use County employees who work is his department to collect monthly water samples. At some point the cost of this option could be compared to the costs of having PBSD-based employees and CH2MHil1-provided workers doing this work. Should the PBSD Board ultimately decide to proceed with hiring a scientist, Ms. Lyberg said the process would begin by requesting approval for a position from the BCC. Class Code: 25365 Pay Grade: 21 COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION CLASSIFICATION TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST,PRINCIPAL PURPOSE OF CLASSIFICATION The purpose of this classification is to plan,implement,and supervise activities of a major environmental protection program within an assigned unit/section. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS The following duties are normal for this position.The omission of specific statements of the duties does not exclude them from the classification if the work is similar,related,or a logical assignment for this classification. Other duties may be required and assigned. Supervises, directs, and evaluates assigned staff, processing employee concerns and problems, directing work, counseling, disciplining, and completing employee performance appraisals; conducts interviews and makes hiring recommendations. Coordinates daily work activities; organizes,prioritizes,and assigns work; monitors status of work in progress and inspects completed work;confers with assigned staff,assists with complex/problem situations,and provides technical expertise. Consults with department management, regulatory agencies, or other officials to review operations/activities, review/resolve problems,receive advice/direction,and provide recommendations; makes presentations to Board of Commissioners. Interprets,applies,and enforces the provisions of environmental regulations and other applicable federal,state,and local codes,laws,rules,regulations,specifications,standards,policies and procedures;researches codes/regulations issues as needed;initiates any actions necessary to correct deviations or violations. Ensures adherence to established safety procedures;monitors work environment and use of safety equipment to ensure safety of employees and other individuals;initiates any actions necessary to correct deviations or violations. Develops,updates,and implements policies and procedures pertaining to area of assignment;generates and implements program protocols designed to enhance productivity and safety. Develops and implements action plans for the assigned programs; plans and implements new programs/projects; monitors section/program performance;evaluates efficiency and effectiveness of program operations,procedures,and use of resources;implements improvements as needed. Supervises and coordinates environmental activities relating to pollution control,pollution prevention,environmental planning,conservation,land development,stormwater management,waterway management,coastal zone management, or related issues. Supervises operations of the Pollution Prevention Section and Analytical Services Section, including activities involving household hazardous waste collection, small business hazardous waste assistance program, wastewater ©DMG-MAXIMUS,INC. Page 1 Last Revised: July,2001 Collier,County,Florida•Environmental Specialist,Principal 25365 treatment plant compliance,storage tank compliance,petroleum clean-up/remediation,domestic sludge disposal and transportation,well application and completion report tracking,surface water quality monitoring,and ground water quality monitoring;manages laboratory operations. Supervises operations of the Pollution Remediation &Control Section,including activities involving environmental assessments,estuarine sediment monitoring,groundwater sampling,storage tank inspections,surface water sampling, and water quality data analysis;coordinates remodeling of well field protection. Performs administrative tasks; assists in developing and implementing budget for assigned area; makes purchasing recommendations; reviews/approves time sheets and leave requests; reviews/approves invoices for payment; coordinates preparation of invoices to bill for program services;applies for grants relating to department programs; develops brochures for public distribution. Administers contracts;monitors work of contracted service providers;ensures compliance with terms of contracts. Provides information and technical assistance concerning environmental regulations,hazardous waste management, waste disposal procedures,pollution control/prevention,storage tanks,small quantity hazard waste generation,natural resources,site development plans,waterway management,coastal zone management,regulatory violations,or other issues; meets with and discusses problem areas with property owners, contractors, developers, and the public; recommends solutions to problems;provides data to customers upon request. Supervises and conducts investigations into complaints regarding pollution, hazardous waste, natural resources, conservation, beaches/waterways, or other environmental issues; investigates fish kills; documents findings of investigations and makes corrective recommendations; updates complainant with information regarding complaint; monitors status of complaints to ensure resolution; notifies appropriate authorities of case problems or incidents as appropriate. Supervises development of water quality monitoring program; provides technical assistance in the development of water/sediment sampling projects;performs reconnaissance of proposed water quality monitoring stations;coordinates and conducts water sampling projects; Collects surface water and ground water samples;schedules and coordinates sampling activities;analyzes algal communities using microscope;prepares sample equipment for use. Supervises and assists with inspections of sludge disposal sites and sludge transportation vehicles; notifies sludge transporters of violations;prepares certified warning letters for non-compliance;reviews sludge transportation licenses and notifies license-holders of expiration. Supervises and assists with inspections of wastewater treatment plant facilities to ensure compliance with applicable regulations;collects effluent samples at wastewater treatment plants;assists with collection of surface water samples; makes recommendations to plant operators concerning needed plant improvements. Supervises and assists with inspections of above-ground storage tanks and underground storage tanks; conducts inspections of small quantity hazardous waste generators as needed; performs waste assessment computations; performs air quality monitoring. Supervises and assists with inspections of businesses to review hazardous waste management/disposal; monitors household hazardous waste facilities;conducts on-site visits to household hazardous waste facilities to pick up receipts of hazardous wastes;converts amounts of hazardous wastes to pounds; prepares reports for calculation of reviewed receipts of hazardous wastes from businesses; picks up and transports household hazardous wastes from residents' homes to waste site as needed. Supervises and assists with petroleum cleanup contract and pollutant storage tank contract activities; performs site inspections and monitors activities; participates in contract negotiation; reviews staff reports;reviews and approves technical reports and invoices;prepares enforcement documents. ©DMG-MAXIMUS,INC. Page 2 Last Revised: July,2001 Collier,County,Florida•Environmental Specialist,Principal 25365 Supervises and assists with inspections of commercial landscape projects and stormwater management plans;reviews landscape plans and storm management plans; inspects irrigation systems; inspects drainage areas and verifies flow paths;negotiates use of landscape materials with landscape architects;ensures compliance with right-of-way ordinance requirements. Supervises and assists with inspections of conservation/preservation areas; evaluates condition of land and habitat; assesses value and quality of habitat;prepares environmental mitigation plans. Supervises and assists with review of zoning petitions and site development plans for compliance with applicable codes and regulations; performs site inspections relating to permit applications and petitions; provides written responses to petition reviews; issues environmental permits; evaluates compliance of plans and projects with parking and handicapped access regulations;reviews and issues clearing permits for vegetation removal;reviews and issues permits for coastal activities/construction;reviews for variances structures seaward of coastal construction setback line;reviews and issues permits for site alternation in environmentally sensitive areas; reviews environmental impact statements; reviews boat dock variance petitions;reviews protected species management plans and exotic vegetation management plans; accepts or rejects on-site deviations from approved plans; prepares staff reports, executive summaries, and resolutions; makes presentations to County Commissioners, Environmental Advisory Board, and Planning Commission;performs plant/animal identifications for staff as needed. Supervises and assists with development of County natural resource management policy;acquires and analyzes data to assess impact on natural resources; produces geographic data to facilitate analysis; converts geographic coordinate systems in data sets; collects GPS coordinate to locate data and converts GPS data to analyzable formats; edits computerized mapping drawings for use in geographical information system (GIS);prepares data in wide variety of formats. Supervises and assists with coordination of the County's artificial reef and water way programs; manages County mitigation projects;applies for reef permits and related permits;dives and maps artificial reef areas;plots drawings on navigation charts;records channel depths;records water levels at County project areas;surveys waterways to identify needed maintenance; recommends boat speed zones,channel marker placements,and manatee protection measures; approves materials for placement on reefs; assists with stranded marine mammal activities; coordinates waterway repairs with U.S. Coast Guard; conducts wildlife and vegetation surveys; removes exotic vegetation from County property; installs artificial reef buoys and public information signs; replaces damaged waterway signs; selects contractors for program activities and monitors work performed by contractors;approves payments to contractors. Supervises and assists with coordination of the County's sea turtle protection program,beach renourishment program, and inlet management plans;coordinates required state/county permits and permit renewals;conducts annual zoning of beaches for GIS record profiles; sets stakes and measures width of beaches; conducts helicopter reconnaissance of beaches to assist with monitoring;conducts beach compaction studies;coordinates beach raking; prepares scientific proposals for sand source studies;conducts surveys and performs exotic plant removal from dunes;establishes annual beach lighting protocol;conducts follow-up beach light inspections;provides technical assistance for alternative beach nourishment;monitors beaches for quality assurance of sea turtle protection program;monitors sea turtle activities on beaches; communicates with media regarding sea turtle events; conducts stranding/salvage on sick/dead sea turtles; coordinates delivery of live strandings to rehabilitative facilities; performs necropsies on dead turtles; provides historical and analytical data regarding sea turtle activities to state/federal agencies upon request. Supervises and assists with environmental monitoring on County-managed property;collects water samples for sulfide analysis; measures salinity and pH in surface and pore water; measures extreme storm effects on Clam Bay NRPA; applies herbicides to maintain exotic plant control in Clam Bay;assists with wetland delineation for permitting. Performs follow-up inspections to ensure proper response to non-compliance problems and correction of deficiencies. Supervises and assists with environmental code enforcement to protect County resources; investigates complaints and violations; conducts inspections of property; gathers evidence of violations and makes photographs of violations;researches property ownership;issues violation notices and citations to violators;posts notices on site or at courthouse; reviews violations with violators and negotiates resolution of problems; reviews mitigation plans; ©DMG-MAXIMUS,INC. Page 3 Last Revised: July,2001 Collier,County,Florida•Environmental Specialist,Principal 25365 determines whether to prosecute code violations; prosecutes cases before Boards or in court as needed; presents evidence and provides testimony;coordinates enforcement activities with other agencies/departments as needed. Compiles and provides to the public guidelines on hazardous waste management,applicable federal,state and local regulations,and requirements to meet compliance. Writes/drafts amendments to local codes as appropriate; assists with development of environmental ordinances, amendments,policies,and procedures. Prepares inspection reports,non-compliance reports,violation notices,and other records;submits required reports to regulatory agencies or other individuals. Maintains computer database of department data; enters information regarding environmental complaints, non- compliance issues,or other data;locates and plots complaints on topographic maps; generates reports and graphs of department data. Conducts research of department files,legal/property records,database records,electronic data sources,Internet sites, hardcopy materials,or other sources as needed. Compiles and/or monitors various administrative and/or statistical data;makes applicable calculations;analyzes data and identifies trends;summarizes data and prepares reports,charts,or presentations. Prepares or completes various forms, reports,correspondence, performance appraisals, growth management plans, action plans,annual reports,assessment reports,invoices,budget projections,purchase orders,executive summaries, chain of custody forms,activity reports,contract reports,safety protocol reports,inspection/re-inspection reports,audit reports,agendas,complaint reports,incident notification forms,violation notices,citations, project summaries,data summaries,sludge transportation reports,wastewater treatment plant reports,storage tank registration forms,household hazardous waste receipt reports,petition reviews,staff reports,resolutions,code amendments,permits,environmental impact statements,wildlife survey reports,project monitoring reports,vehicle maintenance reports,maps,brochures,or other documents. Receives various forms, reports, correspondence, budget reports, invoices, water quality data, contracts, chain of custody forms,activity reports,complaint reports,executive summaries,inspection reports,laboratory reports,well applications, permit/license applications, sludge transportation reports, transportation manifests, program reports, discharge reports,cleanup reports,assessment reports,wastewater treatment plant permits,site assessments,closure assessments, storage tank records, hazardous waste receipts, statistical data, environmental impact statements, site development plans, landscape plans, petitions, variances, environmental audits, groundwater monitoring reports, protected species monitoring reports,notices to mariners,nautical charts,mitigation plans,property cards,deeds,plats, maps, photographs, surveys, material safety data sheets, hazardous materials guides, scientific/technical reports, textbooks, professional publications, laws,codes,ordinances, policies, procedures,manuals, reference materials, or other documentation;reviews,completes,processes,forwards or retains as appropriate. Operates a personal computer, general office equipment, or other equipment as necessary to complete essential functions,to include the use of word processing,spreadsheet,database,photography,graphics,computerized mapping, geographical information system(GIS),e-mail,Internet,or other computer programs;provides current information for publication at County web sites. Operates/utilizes and maintains specialized equipment or tools associated with work activities,which may include a motor vehicle,boat,diving equipment,centrifugal pump,submersible pump,global positioning system(GPS),camera, digital camera,flow meter,chlorine meter,microscope,multi-probe,level,architectural scale,binoculars,herbicide sprayer, water sampler, measuring devices, testing instruments, shovel, auger, or two-way radio; calibrates field instruments. ©DMG-MAXLMUS,INC. Page 4 Last Revised: July,2001 Collier,County,Florida•Environmental Specialist,Principal 25365 Monitors inventory of department equipment and supplies;ensures availability of adequate materials to conduct work activities; initiates requisitions for new/replacement materials; obtains product information and competitive price quotes for prospective purchases. Coordinates projects and work activities with those of other departments,consultants,contractors,local municipalities, regulatory agencies,outside agencies,or others as needed. Communicates with department management, County boards/officials, employees, other departments, sludge transportation companies, contractors, developers, landscape architects, engineers, consultants, attorneys, court personnel,customers,the public,community organizations,local municipalities,regulatory agencies,outside agencies, the media,and other individuals as needed to coordinate work activities,review status of work,exchange information, resolve problems,or give/receive advice/direction. Attends meetings,serves on committees,and makes presentations as needed; participates in workshops and County exhibits;prepares displays for presentations and displays. Assists with coordination of County hazardous waste collection events;transports and sets up barricades for events. Maintains a comprehensive, current knowledge of applicable laws/regulations; maintains an awareness of new methods, trends, and advances in the profession; reads professional literature; maintains professional affiliations; attends workshops and training sessions as appropriate. ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS Performs general/clerical tasks,which may include answering telephone calls,typing documents,making copies, sending/receiving faxes,filing documentation,or processing incoming/outgoing mail. Provides assistance to other employees or departments as needed. Performs other related duties as required. In the event of a declared state of emergency,employees in this classification may be called to work during days or hours other than those for which they are regularly scheduled. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Bachelor's degree in Environmental Science, Natural Sciences, Chemistry, Biology, Geology,Zoology, or closely related field; supplemented by five (5) years of progressively responsible previous experience and/or training that includes environmental program administration, pollution control,water quality management, wastewater treatment operations, water sample analysis, environmental assessment, ecological impact analysis, wetland permitting, environmental permitting, waterway management,artificial reef building,coastal zone management,environmental code enforcement,computerized mapping,and/or personal computer operations; or any equivalent combination of education, training, and experience which provides the requisite knowledge, skills,and abilities for this job. May require possession and maintenance of valid OSHA Certified Hazardous Material Operations certification.May require possession and maintenance of valid U.S. Coast Guard Boating Safety certification. May require possession and maintenance of valid Advanced Open Water Diving certification.May require possession and maintenance of valid Federal Department of Environmental Protection (PREP) Certified Tank Inspector certification: May require possession and maintenance of valid Limited Lawn&Ornamental Pest Control Applicator's License.Must possess and maintain a valid Florida driver's license. ©DMG-MAXIMUS,INC. Page 5 Last Revised: July,2001 Cotter,County,Florida•Environmental Specialist,Principal 25365 PERFORMANCE APTITUDES Data Utilization: Requires the ability to evaluate, audit, deduce, and/or assess data using established criteria. Includes exercising discretion in determining actual or probable consequences and in referencing such evaluation to identify and select alternatives. Human Interaction: Requires the ability to apply principles of persuasion and/or influence over others in a supervisory capacity.Requires the ability to apply principles of persuasion and/or influence over others in coordinating activities of a project,program,or designated area of responsibility. Equipment,Machinery,Tools,and Materials Utilization: Requires the ability to operate,maneuver and/or control the actions of equipment,machinery,tools,and/or materials used in performing essential functions. Verbal Aptitude: Requires the ability to utilize a wide variety of reference,descriptive,advisory and/or design data and information. Mathematical Aptitude: Requires the ability to perform addition,subtraction,multiplication and division;ability to calculate decimals and percentages; may include ability to perform mathematical operations with fractions; may include ability to compute discount, interest,and ratios; may include ability to calculate surface areas, volumes, weights,and measures. Functional Reasoning: Requires the ability to apply principles of influence systems,such as motivation,incentive, and leadership, and to exercise independent judgment to apply facts and principles for developing approaches and techniques to resolve problems. Situational Reasoning: Requires the ability to exercise judgment,decisiveness and creativity in situations involving the evaluation of information against sensory,judgmental,or subjective criteria,as opposed to that which is clearly measurable or verifiable. Leadership: Customer Service: Financial Accountability: ADA COMPLIANCE Physical Ability: Tasks require the ability to exert very moderate physical effort in light work,typically involving some combination of stooping, kneeling,crouching and crawling,and which may involve some lifting,carrying, pushing and/or pulling of objects and materials of moderate weight(12-20 pounds). Sensory Requirements: Some tasks require the ability to perceive and discriminate colors or shades of colors,sounds, odor,depth,texture,and visual cues or signals. Some tasks require the ability to communicate orally. Environmental Factors: Performance of essential functions may require exposure to adverse environmental conditions, such as dirt, dust, pollen,odors, wetness, humidity, rain, temperature extremes, hazardous materials, traffic hazards,water hazards,bright/dim light,toxic agents,disease,pathogenic substances,animal/wildlife attacks, or animal bites. Collier County is an Equal Opportunity Employer.In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,the County will provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities and encourages both prospective and current employees to discuss potential accommodations with the employer. ©DMG-MAXIMUS,INC. Page 6 Last Revised: July,2001 MATCH GRADE MIN MKTPT MAX POINT I 18 $45,446 $53,466 $68,169 $58,813 $21.8491 $25.7048 $32.7736 $28.2753 I 19 $48,245 $56,759 $72,368 $62,435 I $23.1948 $27.2880 $34.7922 $30.0168 I 20 $50,606 $59,536 $75,908.4 $65,490 $24.3298 $28.6230 $36943 $31.4855 I 21 $53,139 $25.5474 $62,516 $79,708 $68,768 $30.0558 $38.3210 $33.0613 I 22 $55,795 $65,641 $83,692 2 $72,205 $26.8244 $31.5582 $40366 $34.7140 I 23 $58,585 $68,924 $87,878 $75,816 $28.1658 $33.1365 $42.2490 $36.4500 I 24 $61,515 $72,370 $92,272 $79,607 $29.5743 $34.7933 $44.3614 $38.2726 I 25 S64,657 $31.0850 $76,067 $96,985 $83,674 $36.5706 $46.6277 $40.2278 26 $67,820 $79,788 $101,729 $87,767 $32.6057 $38.3596 $48.9084 $42.1956 I 27 $71,211 $83,778 $106,817 $92,156 $34.2360 $40.2778 $51.3544 $44.3057 28 $74,772 $87,967 $112,158 $96,764 $35.9480 $42.2918 $53.9221 $46.5211 29 $83,905 $93,228 $118,865 $83,905 $40.3389 $44.8211 $57.1469 $40.3389 I 30 $88,188 $97,987 $124,933 $88,188 $42.3980 $47.1091 $60.0642 $42.3980 31 $92,597 $102,886 $131,180 $92,597 I $44.5178 $494644 $63.0673 $44.5177 I 32 $97,228 $108,031 $137,739 $97,228 $46.7442 $51.9379 $66.2209 $46.7442 33 $102,089 $113,432 $144,626 $102,089 I $49.0813 $54.5348 $69.5319 $49.0813 I 34 $107,193 $119,103 $151,856 $107,193 $51.5350 $57.2610 $73.0079 $51.5350 I 35 $112,552 $54.1116 $125,058 $159,449 $112,552 $60.1241 $76.6582 $54.1116 36 $118,181 $131,312 $167,423 $118,181 $56.8177 $63.1307 $80.4916 $56.8177 Dear PBSD Board, On behalf of Dr.Trecker,this is a one-way communication.To avoid Sunshine issues,please do not reply/comment. Lisa Original Message From:david trecker = = c n Sent:Wednesday,January 14,2015 1:48 PM To:ResnickLisa Subject:Water Quality Guru Lisa-Please forward the following as a one-way message to the directors and Neil.Thanks,Dave The board has expressed interest in locating an expert to oversee/coordinate water-quality programs in the upland lakes and Clam Bay.The rationale is that the programs are complex,interrelated and would benefit at this time from management by a true expert.Among the issues are copper monitoring and,perhaps,remediation;water quality in Clam Bay vs FDEP guidelines;non-copper-based algae/duckweed control in the lakes.I have been involved in these programs for some time and,along with others,have interacted with a number of possible candidates for such a job.I recently spoke by phone with three of them. Dr.David Tomasko(ESA/Water)has consulted extensively with Collier County and the PB Foundation and was instrumental in drafting FDEP nutrient standards for Clam Bay.He is will known and respected and has broad knowledge about Clam Bay and its water-quality status.He is very well plugged into the FDEP.He would be interested in a management/oversight role. Jim Bays(CH2M Hill)has an M.S.in Environmental Engineering and has consulted with us on a number of occasions.He is an expert on both freshwater lakes and brackish-water estuaries and knows our issues well. He too would be interested in such a consulting position. Steve Gong(retired,formerly with CH2M Hill)has an M.S. in Marine Ecology.He previously coordinated our lake sampling,analysis and reporting and,as such,knows our situation well. He has had extensive experience dealing with the FDEP_He indicated he might be interested in a management/oversight role. Dr.Serge Thomas(FGCU)is the fourth candidate. He is a true expert on water-quality problems in lakes and estuaries.I have not spoken with him because of his constraints as an academic. I have some idea of costs and can review these with the WM and CB Committees. The take-home message is that there are people out there who could coordinate and manage our water-quality programs. Dave Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. Discussions with Tim Hall and others indicate the following items in the recently approved Clam Bay NRPA Management Plan are not covered in the FY 2015 budget. This will be relevant as we develop priorities. Objective 1 A. 1. Establish plots and photo points in Coastal Scrub and Cabbage Palm Hammock habitats and monitor periodically. A. 4. Monitor benthic organisms periodically. B. 2. Monitor gopher tortoise burrows periodically. Objective 2 A. 4. Conduct bathymetric surveys of interconnecting waterways when needed. A. 5. Determine whether ecological benefits of intervention activities outweigh potential negative ecological impacts. B. 1. Identify freshwater inputs (quantity, quality and timing). B. 2. Evaluate effects of freshwater inputs on existing native communities and develop remediation strategies if needed. Objective 3 A. Develop a long-term water quality program that ensures a sustainable healthy environment for all users. [Items 1-5 are not currently covered, per Tim Hall.] Objective 4 — Nothing currently covered. ,-, ...7 , . CLAM BAY NRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN ' ,_}_, Pelican Bay Services Division I �--- October 2014 Ver. 6.5 Objective 1 —Maintain and protect the native floral and faunal communities within the Clam Bay NRPA This objective is focused on ensuring natural resource protection and long-term sustainability by evaluating and prioritizing available relevant information about the estuary in order to develop and implement a cohesive management strategy that protects the native floral and faunal communities. A. Maintain healthy, native floral and faunal populations. 1) Establish plots and photo points in Coastal Scrub and Cabbage Palm Hammock habitats and monitor periodically. 2) Monitor established plots in the mangroves periodically. 3) Monitor established transects in the seagrasses periodically. •oni or .en is organisms perio•ica y. 5) Monitor wildlife within the NRPA periodically. 6) Determine through regular biological monitoring whether intervention strategies are necessary to protect the ecological health of the NRPA. B. Protect Listed Species. _ 1) Identify and determine the status of listed floral and faunal species and associated 1 _ habitats to the extent possible. 2) Monitor gopher tortoise burrows periodically. `r 3) Acquire Collier County sea turtle nesting data as they become available. 4} Update educational information on species, such as the Clam Bay Guide, as needed. C. Remove Exotic and Nuisance Flora and Fauna. 1) Locate and identify exotic and nuisance species within the Clam Bay NRPA. 1 2) Remove, or report to the responsible entity for removal, Category I and II invasive exotic species and nuisance species as needed. t 39 CLAM BA FNRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN Pelican Bay Services Division October 2014 Ver. 6.5 Objective 2—Ensure the estuary has adequate tidal and freshwater flows to maintain ecological health within the Clam Bay NRPA This objective is focused on managing hydrology and evaluating freshwater inputs to the Clam Bay NRPA. A. Identify the minimum tidal flow necessary to ensure a healthy ecosystem. Provide sufficient tidal exchange to maximize benefits while minimizing negative environmental impacts. 1) Conduct periodic bathymetric surveys of Clam Pass. -�_a— 2) Conduct periodic analysis of tidal data. 3) Maintain tidal gauges. 4) Conducthathymetric surveys of interconnecting waterways when needed. 5) Determine whether ecological benefits of intervention activities outweigh potential negative ecological impacts. ?~6) Monitor identified variables of Clam Pass conditions to determine when dredging is needed. (See Chapter 5.0 and Appendix 5 for information on variables.) 7) Seek appropriate federal and state permits to dredge Clam Pass or interconnecting i waterways if needed. B. Ensure appropriate freshwater inputs and drainage. I) Identify freshwater inputs(quantity, quality, and timing). 2) Evaluate effects of freshwater inputs on existing native communities and develop remediation strategies if needed. 3) Conduct periodic monitoring of hand-dug channels. 4) Perform periodic maintenance of selected sections of hand-dug channels. Objective 3—Monitor and maintain water quality within the Clam Bay NRPA This objective is focused on ensuring compliance with State and Federal water quality standards and reducing pollutant inputs to maintain ecological health. A. Develop a long-term water quality program that ensures a sustainable healthy environment for all users. 1) Follow a program of water-quality data collection and analysis that addresses the site specific alternative criteria and methodologies approved by the FDEP. 2) Sample monthly from sites used to establish FDEP site specific alternative criteria. 3) Ensure sampling and testing protocols comply with FDEP guidelines and standards. 4) Develop intervention strategies when standards are not met. 5) Enter data into STORET system annually 6) Continue efforts to address copper impairment in the Clam Bay NRPA. 40 CLAM BAY NRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN Pelican Bay Services Division October 2014 Ver. 6.5 B. Promote programs for controlling water pollution from point and nonpoint sources. romote est anagement Practices for fertilizer and irrigation use. 2) Promote programs to reduce algae levels in upland stormwater ponds. 3) Promote programs to reduce copper input into stormwater ponds. 4) Investigate new methodologies for controlling water pollution. 1 Objective 4—Monitor archaeological sites within the Clam Bay NRPA This objective is focused on recognizing the presence and importance of archeological sites within the Clam Bay NRPA. A. Monitor conditions of known archaeological sites. 1) Review historical records of Florida Division of Historical Resources (DHR)on known archaeological sites. 2) Inspect known archaeological sites periodically. 3) Report findings as appropriate to DHR. B. Implement strategies for the protection of archaeological sites as needed. Objective 5—Ensure recreational activities are environmentally compatible within the Clam Bay NRPA This objective is focused on recognizing recreational uses, ensuring that public use facilities are maintained,monitoring associated impacts to the estuary, and promoting public awareness and stewardship of this sensitive area. A. Monitor access and the condition of the facilities for recreational uses. 1) Report vegetation needing to be trimmed to the responsible entity. — 2) Report litter needing to be removed to the responsible entity. 3) Report facilities needing to be repaired or replaced to the responsible entity. B. Maintain existing canoe trail. Inspect signage periodically. 2) Repair or replace trail marker signage as needed. 3) Repair or replace caution seagrass and shoaling signs as needed. 4) Revise and/or reprint the Canoe Trail Guide as needed. a C. Maintain existing signage for safe swimmer and boater usage. 1) Inspect signage periodically. 2) Repair or replace signage as needed. D. Momitor-use-ollacilitiesLarealor recreational uses. 1) Encourage citizens to report unsafe or environmentally harmful use. 2) Coordinate with responsible entity to enforce the laws and regulations as needed. 41 CLAM BAY NRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN Pelican Bay Services Division October 2014 Ver. 6.5 3) Continue to support the use of the Clam Bay NRPA for low-impact recreational uses. E. Maintain materials to educate visitors about the unique features of the Clam Bay NRPA. Inspect educational signage periodically. 2) Report signage needing repair or replacement to the responsible entity. 3) Update Clam Bay Guide as needed. Reporting Regular reports will be prepared at least annually, summarizing the data collection and management activities. Reports will evaluate datasets by comparing results to baseline conditions (if known)or through trending analysis. Additionally,reports will recommend whether any intervention strategies or actions are necessary to meet the objectives. The goal and all objectives will be evaluated at least annually in conjunction with past and present research programs conducted within the Clam Bay NRPA to determine ecosystem status. If progress in achieving objectives is not favorable, then the methods will be re-evaluated and updated as needed. Alternative methodologies will be explored, if warranted,to achieve progress in meeting the goal of maintaining the health of the Clam Bay NRPA. 42 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Cotter County Administrative Services Division Procurement Services COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Solicitation 15-6397 - Environmental & Biological Studies Adam Northrup, Procurement Strategist 239-252-6098 (Telephone) 239-252-6302 (Fax) adamnorthrup @colliergov.net(Email) This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format. Any alterations to this document made by the Vendor may be grounds for rejection of proposal, cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County Government. PiaurenertS uteri Depa tmerA.3327 Tamiami Trail East Naples,Florida 34112-4501•nrxw.cal5ergov.nerparchasing Exhibit I: Scope of Work, Specifications and Response Format As requested by the Pelican Bay Services Division (hereinafter, the "Division or Department"), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department (hereinafter, "County") has issued this Request for Proposal (hereinafter, "RFP") with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Consultant, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Specifications or Scope of Work stated. The results of this solicitation may be used by other County departments once awarded according to the Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Policy. Brief Description of Purchase It is the intent of the County to have multiple firms available, who provide various Environmental and Biological related consulting services and expertise as required. The services provided as a result of these contracts will be available to the Pelican Bay Services Division and all other County departments, and may include a variety of Environmental and Biological services as requested by the County. Historically, the Pelican Bay Services Division has spent approximately $156,000, annually and other County departments have spent approximately $46,000 annually. Background The Pelican Bay Services Division Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit of Collier County, Florida was established by Collier County Ordinance 1990-111 and Ordinances 2013-19, 2006-05 and 2002-27 as amended to provide quality street lighting, water management, and streetscape beautification services exclusively to the residents of Pelican Bay. They work closely with the Pelican Bay Foundation and Pelican Bay Property Owners Association to establish and identify resources to meet the needs of their residents Awarded contract(s) are classified as fixed term Countywide Agreements for various and miscellaneous professional environmental consulting and biological services which will be utilized on an as-needed basis. Assignments shall be implemented by purchase order subject to a maximum of $100,000 per purchase order without BCC approval and with a maximum annual contract amount of $500,000. Purchase orders for a single service in excess of $100,000 shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. For each assigned purchase order, Collier County reserves the right to task the selected Consultant to perform services that are deemed necessary by the County to be performed, which are related to the services outlined herein, but which are not specifically set out in this RFP. The County reserves the right to order such services from selected firms as may be required during said period, but does not guarantee any minimum or maximum services to be ordered during the period specified from any given firm. Work service assignments shall be at the sole discretion of the County. The selected firms shall be responsible for knowledge of and compliance with all relative local, state and Federal codes and regulations. Additionally, each staff member assigned to a County project(s) shall have a minimum of five (5) years experience that is directly related to the required tasks. Detailed Scope of Work performed for Pelican Bay Services Division It shall be understood and agreed that any and all services, materials and equipment shall comply fully with all Local, State and Federal laws and regulations. The Clam Bay Mangrove Monitoring and Maintenance Program is a plan to analyze the ecological health of the mangrove system within the Clam Bay Estuary, which includes specific monitoring activities to monitor prior restoration activities within the Clam Bay ecosystem and the regeneration of dying mangroves. The Clam Bay Ecosystem is located along the west coast of Collier County, west of the Pelican Bay Residential Community. An integral part of the Clam Bay Mangrove Monitoring and Maintenance Program includes biological and hydrographic monitoring to analyze the ongoing effects of the improvement initiatives previously undertaken in the Clam Bay System to restore the die-off areas and to help identify future initiatives necessary to assure a healthy mangrove estuary system. Services requested under an awarded contract include but are not limited to the following: • Monitor established mangrove plots, including data, photographs of each plot and quarterly rooftop photos of mangroves. • Monitor sea grass transects in Outer Clam Bay and nearby channels. • Monitor three continuous water level loggers deployed in Clam Bay. • Inspect and schedule maintenance of the hand-dug channels. • Field observations and reports. • Prepare and present annual reports. • Establish and monitor plots in scrub and hammock habitats. • Monitor gopher tortoise burrows. • Monitor other bird, fish, and benthic invertebrates. • Monitor archeological sites. • Monitor Upland activities. • Inspect canoe trails and signage. • Produce and promote educational materials. • Coordination with outside entities regarding vegetation and litter control. • Monitor for piping plover presence. • Tidal data analysis and reporting. • Bathymetric analysis and reporting. • Water quality analysis and reporting. Contractor personnel requirements include: Degreed (biological science and/or natural resource management) and minimum five (5) years experience in similar work. Detailed Scope of Work performed for other County Departments The selected Consultants will assist the County by reviewing and commenting on the project from an environmental compliance perspective. The Consultants will review and coordinate with the permitting consultants and regulatory agencies regarding the following (Services requested under an awarded contract include but are not limited to): • Wetland delineation. • Wetland quality. • Mitigation. • Threatened & endangered species surveys. • Other requirements necessary for obtaining South Florida Water Management Department, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and other permits. The selected Consultant shall also review and audit all correspondence, including all permit applications, between consultants and regulatory agencies pertaining to environmental issues. This review shall document the completeness and accuracy of said correspondence. There will be an emphasis on providing cost-effective solutions to the County during the permitting process. The selected Consultant for a project shall provide these services independent of other firms who may be providing similar services on a project or projects. The Consultant shall further track all project permits and ensure permit special condition compliance. The Consultant shall assist and advise the County Project Managers in environmental matters and issues. Contractor personnel requirements include: Degreed (biological science and/or natural resource management) and minimum five (5) years experience in similar work. Proposal Selection Committee and Evaluation Factors The County Manager shall appoint a Selection Committee to review all proposals submitted. The factors to be considered in the evaluation of proposal responses are listed below. Tab II, Technical Proposal 25 Points Tab III, Expertise of Designated Staff 14 Points Tab IV, Previous Performance on Similar Jobs 15 Points Tab V, References 10 Points Tab VI, Cost Estimate 16 Points Tab VII, Project Approach and Understanding 10 Points Tab VIII, Office Locations and Responsiveness 10 Points TOTAL 100 Points REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Collier County Administrative Services Division Procurement Services COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Solicitation 15-6397 - Environmental & Biological Studies Adam Northrup, Procurement Strategist 239-252-6098 (Telephone) 239-252-6302 (Fax) adamnorthrup @colliergov.net(Email) This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format. Any alterations to this document made by the Vendor may be grounds for rejection of proposal, cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County Government. un ProaremoriSonrces Departmcrl•3327 Tamiami Trad East•Naples.Florida 34112-4901•www.colliergov.not/purchasing Exhibit I: Scope of Work, Specifications and Response Format As requested by the Pelican Bay Services Division (hereinafter, the "Division or Department"), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department (hereinafter, "County") has issued this Request for Proposal (hereinafter, "RFP") with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Consultant, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Specifications or Scope of Work stated. The results of this solicitation may be used by other County departments once awarded according to the Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Policy. Brief Description of Purchase It is the intent of the County to have multiple firms available, who provide various Environmental and Biological related consulting services and expertise as required. The services provided as a result of these contracts will be available to the Pelican Bay Services Division and all other County departments, and may include a variety of Environmental and Biological services as requested by the County. Historically, the Pelican Bay Services Division has spent approximately $156,000, annually and other County departments have spent approximately $46,000 annually. Background The Pelican Bay Services Division Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit of Collier County, Florida was established by Collier County Ordinance 1990-111 and Ordinances 2013-19, 2006-05 and 2002-27 as amended to provide quality street lighting, water management, and streetscape beautification services exclusively to the residents of Pelican Bay. They work closely with the Pelican Bay Foundation and Pelican Bay Property Owners Association to establish and identify resources to meet the needs of their residents Awarded contract(s) are classified as fixed term Countywide Agreements for various and miscellaneous professional environmental consulting and biological services which will be utilized on an as-needed basis. Assignments shall be implemented by purchase order subject to a maximum of $100,000 per purchase order without BCC approval and with a maximum annual contract amount of $500,000. Purchase orders for a single service in excess of$100,000 shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. For each assigned purchase order, Collier County reserves the right to task the selected Consultant to perform services that are deemed necessary by the County to be performed, which are related to the services outlined herein, but which are not specifically set out in this RFP. The County reserves the right to order such services from selected firms as may be required during said period, but does not guarantee any minimum or maximum services to be ordered during the period specified from any given firm. Work service assignments shall be at the sole discretion of the County. The selected firms shall be responsible for knowledge of and compliance with all relative local, state and Federal codes and regulations. Additionally, each staff member assigned to a County project(s) shall have a minimum of five (5) years experience that is directly related to the required tasks. Detailed Scope of Work performed for Pelican Bay Services Division It shall be understood and agreed that any and all services, materials and equipment shall comply fully with all Local, State and Federal laws and regulations. The Clam Bay Mangrove Monitoring and Maintenance Program is a plan to analyze the ecological health of the mangrove system within the Clam Bay Estuary, which includes specific monitoring activities to monitor prior restoration activities within the Clam Bay ecosystem and the regeneration of dying mangroves. The Clam Bay Ecosystem is located along the west coast of Collier County, west of the Pelican Bay Residential Community. An integral part of the Clam Bay Mangrove Monitoring and Maintenance Program includes biological and hydrographic monitoring to analyze the ongoing effects of the improvement initiatives previously undertaken in the Clam Bay System to restore the die-off areas and to help identify future initiatives necessary to assure a healthy mangrove estuary system. Services requested under an awarded contract include but are not limited to the following: • Monitor established mangrove plots, including data, photographs of each plot and quarterly rooftop photos of mangroves. • Monitor sea grass transects in Outer Clam Bay and nearby channels. • Monitor three continuous water level loggers deployed in Clam Bay. • Inspect and schedule maintenance of the hand-dug channels. • Field observations and reports. • Prepare and present annual reports. • Establish and monitor plots in scrub and hammock habitats. • Monitor gopher tortoise burrows. • Monitor other bird, fish, and benthic invertebrates. • Monitor archeological sites. • Monitor Upland activities. • Inspect canoe trails and signage. • Produce and promote educational materials. • Coordination with outside entities regarding vegetation and litter control. • Monitor for piping plover presence. • Tidal data analysis and reporting. • Bathymetric analysis and reporting. • Water quality analysis and reporting. Contractor personnel requirements include: Degreed (biological science and/or natural resource management) and minimum five (5) years experience in similar work. Detailed Scope of Work performed for other County Departments The selected Consultants will assist the County by reviewing and commenting on the project from an environmental compliance perspective. The Consultants will review and coordinate with the permitting consultants and regulatory agencies regarding the following (Services requested under an awarded contract include but are not limited to): • Wetland delineation. • Wetland quality. • Mitigation. • Threatened & endangered species surveys. • Other requirements necessary for obtaining South Florida Water Management Department, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and other permits. The selected Consultant shall also review and audit all correspondence, including all permit applications, between consultants and regulatory agencies pertaining to environmental issues. This review shall document the completeness and accuracy of said correspondence. There will be an emphasis on providing cost-effective solutions to the County during the permitting process. The selected Consultant for a project shall provide these services independent of other firms who may be providing similar services on a project or projects. The Consultant shall further track all project permits and ensure permit special condition compliance. The Consultant shall assist and advise the County Project Managers in environmental matters and issues. Contractor personnel requirements include: Degreed (biological science and/or natural resource management) and minimum five (5) years experience in similar work.