Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 06/03/2015
PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Municipal Service Taxing & Benefit Unit NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 3, 2015 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3 AT 1 PM AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, LOCATED AT 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108. AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of May 6 meeting minutes 5. Audience comments 6. * CIP Phase 3 landscaping plans 7. * Multi-way stop at North Pointe Drive & Pelican Bay Boulevard 8. * Beach renourishment 9. * Bids for Oak Lake Sanctuary lake bank work 10. * Oak Lake Sanctuary swale 11. * Bids for Oakmont lake bank work 12. *Water parameters for berm sites 13. * Clam Bay pilot oyster program 14. * Brazilian pepper removal 15. * Fiscal Year 2016 Budget 16. Administrator's report a. April financial report b. May financial report 17. Committee reports a. Beach renourishment b. Budget c. Clam Bay d. Landscape & Safety e. Water Management 18. Chair's comments a. PBSD & PBF landscaping b. Topics for future meetings 19. Unfinished business 20. New business 21. Adjournment * asterisk indicates possible Board action item ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE,WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT(239)597-1749 OR VISIT PELICANBAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET. 5/29/2015 3:36:40 PM Background information for June 3, 2015 PBSD Board meeting ACTION ITEMS CIP Phase 3 landscaping plans—The Landscape and Safety Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the PBSD Board that Phase 3 not be completed this summer. The proposed plans are attached. Three-way stop signs at PB Blvd.and North Point Dr.—The Landscape and Safety Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the PBSD Board not to recommend to the BCC that this intersection become a three-way stop. The County's traffic study is attached. Beach Renourishment—The Ad hoc Beach Renourishment Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the PBSD Board that no beach renourishment be done on Pelican Bay beaches this year. This is consistent with the unanimous recommendation of the Coastal Advisory Committee to the BCC that no beach renourishment be done on County beaches this year. The recent beach survey results and related documents are attached. Bids for Oak Lake Santuary lake bank work are attached. Oak Lake Santuary swale work. Following the County-mandated removal of Brazilian peppers, a swale is needed to control the flow of water from the pipe under Highway 41 to the lake at Oak Lake Sanctuary. Neil will provide estimated cost information and funding sources at Wednesday's meeting. Bids for Oakmont Lake bank work are attached. Water parameters for berm sites. The Clam Bay Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the PBSD Board that the parameters specified in the Clam Bay NRPA Management Plan be measured monthly for the six berm sites. PBSD Board action at the May meeting to take water samples for only five months per year was not consistent with the Management Plan. Pertinent information from the Management Plan is included with the Board materials. Clam Bay pilot oyster program. The Clam Bay Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the PBSD Board that 15 oyster recruitment stations be deployed this summer throughout the waters of Clam Bay to ascertain whether oysters can be sustained in the system at a cost not to exceed $1500. Relevant photos are included with the Board materials. Brazilian pepper removal. It appears that the vendor which has a $38,000 contract for exotic removal/control in Clam Bay could be asked to address the Brazilian pepper removal that Tom Cravens has bought to the Board's attention. Related information is included in the Board materials. FY'16 Budget The Budget Committee voted 3-2 to recommend that PBSD Board approve the proposed FY'16 budget. Additional information highlighting proposed new expenditures is included in the Board materials. Susan O'Brien May 28, 2015 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION MAY 6,2015 The Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on Wednesday,May 6, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples, Florida 34108. In attendance were: Pelican Bay Services Board Susan O'Brien,Chairman Ken Dawson(absent) Joe Chicurel,Vice-Chairman Bohdan Hirniak Henry Bachman(absent) Robert Schoonmaker(absent) Pat Bush Scott Streckenbein Tom Cravens Dave Trecker Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Neil Dorrill,Administrator Mary McCaughtry,Operations Analyst Marion Bolick, Operations Manager Lisa Jacob,Recording Secretary Also Present Kevin Carter,Dorrill Management Group Mohamed Dabees,Humiston&Moore Engineers Dave Cook,Chairman,Pelican Bay Foundation Board Mary Johnson,Pelican Bay Foundation Board Peter Duggan,Mangrove Action Group Ted Raia,Mangrove Action Group Tim Hall,Turrell,Hall&Associates Linda Roth,Mangrove Action Group Jim Hoppensteadt,President, Pelican Bay Foundation AGENDA AS AMENDED 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of 3/14/15 &4/1/15 Regular Session minutes 5. Audience Comments 5.5 Silt level and dredging permit application (add on) 6. Administrator's report a. Extraordinary law enforcement in PB this season b. Reports on Jan-March police and traffic activity in PB c. Addressing sight visibility issues at two intersections d. Schedule for completing outstanding meeting minutes e. Documentation for supplementary invoice request for additional work f. Job description for proposed project manager g. Monthly financial report 7. Administrator feedback, contract renewal and supplemental invoice 8. Committees 9. Committee reports a. Budget i. Preview of FY '16 Budget b. Clam Bay i. Change berm water quality testing 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6,2015 c. Landscape and Safety d. Water Management i. Release portion of drainage easement at the Commons ii. Use County lab to collect/test water quality samples in ponds iii. Inclusion of littoral plantings in 2016 budget request(add on) 10. Chair's Comments a. June meeting b. Summer Board meeting schedule c. Gulf Bay proposal for changes to medians near Waterpark Place d. Water management activities and funding 11. Unfinished Business 12. New Business 13. Adjournment ROLL CALL With the exception of Mr. Bachman, Mr. Dawson and Mr. Schoonmaker, all members were present and a quorum was established. AGENDA APPROVAL Mr. Cravens motioned,Mr.Streckenbein seconded to approve the agenda with the addition of item 5.5 as Silt level and dredging permit applications;item 9d(iii) as Inclusion of littoral plantings in 2016 budget request;and the referral of the approval of the Budget and Clam Bay Committees minutes to those respective Committees for approval. The motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF 3/4/2015 MINUTES Mr. Cravens moved,Dr. Trecker seconded to approve the March 4 minutes as amended[p. 1 correct spelling of Dave Cook's name, and item 7a should read"Water management structures and pipes";p. 2 under the February 4 minutes approval,the second line should refer to items 8e and 10e referring to Brazilian Pepper;p. 3 at top under the Bold heading, line 5 should read the "budget audit taking place";under the Oakmont Lake Pathway Repair, the second sentence should read"It was proposed that the PBSD repair the corresponding eroding embankments";p. 4 at the roll call motion,Mr.Iaizzo and Ms. Obrien voted against the Motion and Mr.Bachman voted for it,and under the Administrator's Report,item a/b,the last sentence should read"Once the process is completed,the staffing and manpower needs related to Foundation support will be clarified';p. 6 under Beach Renourishment Committee, the first sentence should read"The County is conducting an annual beach renourishment survey to determine which areas of the Collier County beaches are eroded such that the 100 foot guidelines are not met"; in the next sentence the word"results"should be stricken,and the last sentence should be removed; under the Landscape and Safety Committee p. 6,the period should be deleted in the last sentence and the following should be added: "...with the Foundation for the renovation and repair of the Oakmont Lake path and its lake banks"; under the Budget Committee, the last part of the first sentence should read, "Mr.Levy indicated that we are looking at an increase in the budget due to increases in the expenditures for beautification". The motion carried unanimously with those edits. 2 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6,2015 APPROVAL OF 4/1/2015 MINUTES Mr. Cravens motioned,Dr. Trecker seconded to approve the April 1 minutes with the correction on P.3 under the Minutes Approval of the Safety Committee,Mr.Bolick's name should be corrected in the ler line,and after a discussion, it was agreed that the last sentence related to line-of-sight issues would remain the same;on P. 3,Item b,in the middle of the paragraph where it refers to road right-of-way, "(ROiI9"should be inserted as it is referred to in this fashion later in the minutes. Mr.Dorrill also clarified the last sentence of Item b, indicating that his expressed concern was that it would create a county wide precedent for the other taxing districts that may have a similar situation. It was agreed that the words "thus,it was unlikely"would be stricken. Under item h, Commons partial drainage easement,in the second paragraph the words "were concerned"in the first line should be replaced with "raised questions about"; the word"to"should be replaced with "on"in the next sentence after the words "projects impact";in the motion under this topic,in the second line,the words "to the"should be replaced with `pending review by";under the Budget Committee,in the third line,the word"make"should be replaced with the word"meet'before "the County deadline";under New Business,after the word"writing",the words "a regular PBSD monthly review..." The Board members also agreed that in the future all motions would be read back to insure that they are correctly stated and include all the required points. Ms. O'Brien also noted that the correct spelling of Mr.Hirniak's first name is Bohdan and should be corrected in the minutes, and Mr.Hoppensteadt should also be noted as being present at the meeting. Under the amended agenda,Item 8K should indicate that it was an "add on';on P. 5 under Status of Tidal Gauges,the "RFD"process should read"RFQ"Process,and the tenses used should both be past tense; on P. 6 under the Chairman's Report,Dr. Chicurel asked that the second sentence be stricken,and replaced with,"Chairman O'Brien also asked the committee chairmen to prepare an overview of their committees to help new Board members in their requests for committee assignments. She also indicated that a discussion of the FY 2016 Budget will take place at the May Board meeting". The motion then carried unanimously with those edits. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Dr. Joseph Doyle asked that the time allotted for comments be changed to three minutes rather than one as is stated on the agenda. He also indicated that he had addressed the County Commission on two occasions, once to remind them of the revenue they receive from Pelican Bay, and the other was to request the Commission to be mindful that Pelican Bay uses their vehicles very differently than the rest of the County when they consider leasing vehicles. Ms. Mollie Moffatt asked the Board to consider an alternate method to amend the minutes as a large amount of time is spent on making corrections. . Mr. John Domenie, representing the Mangrove Action Group, thanked the PBSD for allowing the Clam Bay Booklet to be distributed at the recent Earth Day Celebration at the Conservancy. Many positive responses to it were received. Mr. Gary Ventress from Oak Lake Sanctuary indicated that their riprap vendor had not yet received the request for quotation information which was to be provided to them after the April meeting. Mr. Dorrill advised that it was delivered to them either over the previous weekend or Monday, and they now have plans and specifications in place. Chairman O'Brien added that they hoped to be approving those bids at the June meeting. 3 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6, 2015 Dr. Ted Raia expressed his concern about the governance of the PBSD, suggesting that all of its business is not being conducted at the open meetings. He felt that the Board was acting on issues outside of their purview and the public is not being advised of it unless they specifically inquire. In response to Dr. Trecker's concern, Dr. Raia clarified that he felt that the consultant's hired by the Board were dealing directly with the approving agencies rather than the Board making the decisions at the meetings. Mr. Peter Duggan, President of the Mangrove Action Group, expressed the same concerns that Dr. Raia voiced, and suggested that the consultants should report directly to the Board or one of its members in an open session so information can be disseminated to all interested parties. He also suggested that the Board should take more control of the process. FDEP PERMIT MODIFICATION Ms. O'Brien reported on the meeting held at Humiston and Moore on April 23 where the levels of silt at 10 percent should be modified to 5 percent in the FDEP permit was discussed. Ms. O'Brien, Mr. Dorrill, Mohammed Dabees, Mary Johnson,Jim Hoppensteadt and Linda Roth were in attendance. An agreement was reached to set a local expectation that going forward, each dredging event the silt content would be maintained at no more than 5 percent. Further it was agreed that the FDEP would not be asked to change the silt content from 10 to 5 percent in the permit. Dr. Dabees was asked to memorialize the agreement and provide the document to the participants. Ms. O'Brien read emails into the record that had occurred earlier in the day between herself and Dr, Dabees regarding Dr. Dabees' explanation as to why the prepared document did not reflect the agreement of the April 23 meeting. Dr. Dabees explained why he had phrased the agreement as he did, noting that he had a level of discomfort with the compromise. His concern was also that their ability to operate effectively in the future in an emergency situation may be affected. Options for the Board would be to go forward with Dr. Dabees' suggestion as laid out in his email, allowing the 10 percent silt content in the mechanical dredge, and 5 percent in the hydraulic dredge. Another option would be to go with the original compromise, which was 5 percent with both methods, and another would be to go up to 6 percent. The Board could also request the Agency to modify the application to reflect 10 percent to 5 percent silt content in the permit. Mr. Hall clarified that the 10 percent silt content is what is allowed in the State Statute, and the 5 percent requirement is for beach renourishment projects. Ms. Linda Roth read a prepared statement into the record and urged the Board to make the correction to 5 percent in the permit application, and to take control of the process. Dr. Raia also spoke to the 5 percent being required in the 2012 permit and asked the Board to move forward in that direction. Dr. Dabees suggested that the Board could go back to the State and ask them if the 10 percent rule is applicable to Clam Pass or not, rather than relying on anyone's personal interpretation. Mr. Bob Naegele expressed appreciation for the work the PBSD has done related to their responsibility for Clam Bay, and urged them to be vigilant against allowing that to be undermined in any way. 4 IMNSIONINNOteatr '. .,. tdrr.'WA Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6,2015 Ms. O'Brien spoke to the discussion held at the meeting on April 23 where they would have an internal process through which they could set no more than 5 percent of silt content in the specs when they were getting bids on the dredging activity. The issue of turtle nesting season was briefly discussed as it is related to dredging activity in the Pass if it closed in an emergency situation, and during turtle nesting season that would be severely limited. Mr. Hall added that if there is an emergency situation and the silt content is over 5 percent, if the permit is changed that will significantly slow down the ability to get the pass opened quickly. Ms. Mary Johnson indicated that the dredged sand going onto the beach will in all probability be at 5 percent,but under certain circumstances,there would need to be some flexibility beyond that 5 percent, considering all the reasons Dr. Dabees has indicated, as well as the high costs of trucking loads of sand away. Mr. Dorrill reminded the Board that they are not a governance or policy Board, but an advisory Board to the County Commission,which is the ultimate authority. Approval of many other agencies are also needed, and he did not feel that the Board should take any action today, but should clarify all the issues before making a decision. Ms. O'Brien noted that there were areas where the Board was not as transparent as it should be, as in the case of the transmittal letter that went with the Management Plan,which was not seen by the Board before it was sent. After brief discussion,the Board agreed that the applications as they stand will remain in place unless the Board chose at a later date to make a local decision about maximum silt content. Dr. Trecker motioned, Mr. Cravens seconded that the PBSD Board approve establishing internally the maximum silt content of the sand placed on the beach be 6 percent for a mechanical dredge and 5 percent for a hydraulic dredge. Dr. Trecker then withdrew his motion. A five minute break was then taken. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Ms. O'Brien determined that items a,b and c would be deferred to the following month. SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING OUTSTANDING MINUTES It was agreed that in the future all minutes will be provided to the respective committees immediately upon their completion for approval. Mr. Dorrill noted that they were trying to provide six to eight sets of minutes per month to bring the minutes up to date. Ms. O'Brien asked that a clean copy be provided to the committees, with names and motion makers corrected as necessary by staff. SUPPLEMENTARY INVOICE FOR ADDITIONAL WORK Mr. Dorrill provided this information as requested for the additional work that was done in connection with Clam Bay Activities, adding that he had waived one month of his own fees as a professional courtesy. Ms. O'Brien suggested that the six Clam Bay Committee meetings 5 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6,2015 noted as being attended were part of what she would consider normal activity, and felt that the request should be reduced from 35 hours to 23 hours. Mr. Dorrill noted that there were several activities with various County officials and BCC members that were part of those 35 hours as well. Mr. Cravens motioned,Dr. Trecker seconded that the Board approve the$5,075 requested for supplemental work. The motion passed six to one with Ms. O'Brien voting against it. JOB DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED PROJECT MANAGER The Budget Committee requested specific monthly or annual activity associated with this new position, and as per the County Human Resource Department, is an entry level, associate position. Mr. Dorrill will share the specific work plan with the Board as early as the following day in advance of the next Budget Committee meeting. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT The Board agreed to continue the financial report to the following month. ADMINISTRATOR FEEDBACK, CONTRACT RENEWAL, SUPPLEMENTAL INVOICE The supplemental invoice topic was previously covered, and Ms. O'Brien asked for positive input from the Board members for Mr. Dorrill. Dr. Trecker complemented Mr. Dorrill on his excellent skills in working with the County and the Foundation; additionally he responds to all calls and takes the time to answer questions, and is a good administrator of the various ongoing projects. Mr. Streckenbein agreed, adding that he is a professional in all situations. The rest of the Board agreed, adding that his knowledge of the various aspects of his administration is excellent and his presence is very beneficial to the PBSD. Dr. Trecker expressed a wish for more of Mr. Dorrill's time,but that was seen as a plus as well, as he shares solutions to problems that arose in other communities he manages with the PBSD Board. Another Board member added that Mr. Dorrill is the conduit for the Board and he does an excellent job as he knows the County codes and regulations, and he works with the PBSD Board to enlighten them and keep them aware of obligations and restrictions. Ms. O'Brien felt that Mr. Dorrill could work with the PBSD or Dorrill Management staff to accomplish needed work in a more expeditious manner. The Oak Lake Bank Restoration was an example, as were the stop signs at the crosswalks in Pelican Bay, of projects that took much longer than they should have to accomplish. Ms. O'Brien also asked Mr. Dorrill to bring important issues to the Board and the committees in their areas of responsibility, and to respond to emails in a timely manner. Examples were given of certain times when this had not happened,primarily concerning the Clam Bay Management Plan. Mr. Dorrill advised the Board that within an 11 member Board his primary communication has been with the Committee Chair, and he asked Ms. O'Brien to list the areas for him that she has the most concern with, and he will work with her on those. Dr. Trecker motioned,Dr. Chicurel seconded to notify the County Purchasing Director that the PBSD Board wished to renew Mr.Dorrill's contract. The motion carried unanimously. 6 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6,2015 COMMITTEES Ms. O'Brien asked the Board members to advise her of any further committee preferences or changes by Friday of that week. BUDGET COMMITTEE REPORT Mr. Bachman was not in attendance, and because of the Sunshine law, Mr. Dorrill did not share the email he received earlier from Mr. Bachman for Ms. O'Brien before the meeting that related to his budget position. Ms. O'Brien will address this after the meeting with Mr. Dorrill. Some of the budget increases were pointed out in the background material, and the budget will be brought before the Board for approval at the June meeting. CLAM BAY COMMITTEE REPORT TRANSMITTAL TO ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Ms. O'Brien noted that the Army Corps of Engineers was being contacted to clarify to that the Clam Bay Management Program is an integral part of the permit application. That has been done, and a copy of that transmittal will be provided to the Chairman by Mr. Hall. BERM WATER QUALITY TESTING CHANGES The Clam Bay Committee is recommending that the water quality samples from the berm sites be done only from June through October with the parameters as specified in the permit. Ms. O'Brien motioned,Mr. Cravens seconded that the Board approve the Clam Bay Committee's recommendation regarding the berm water quality testing. The motion carried unanimousy. Dr. Trecker felt that the numbers were meaningless as the water quality changed from month to month in those areas, and are almost always artificially high. Mr. Hall recommended that the testing should continue to be done. LANDSCAPE & SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT The monthly committee meeting has not yet been held, and the concept drawings have not yet been received from Ms. Goetz. Dr. Chicurel has received some emails from the residents complaining about some of the landscaping,which he will bring to the Committee and then to the full Board. Ms. O'Brien asked about the expanded mulch areas in the community, and suggested that this could be addressed by the Committee. WATER MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE RELEASE OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT THE COMMONS In response to Ms. O'Brien's concerns about the authority of the Board to release this easement,Mr. Dorrill indicated that the staff engineer had reviewed this, and he noted that the operative language was contained the in the first paragraph of the 3/24 letter sent by Mr. Carr in this regard. Mr. Dorrill will confirm that this is an administrative matter, or if it will require the 7 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6,2015 approval of the County Commission, and he will advise the Board once he has spoken with Mr. Carr about this issue. The Board will receive copies of the documents involved in the easement release. Mr. Cravens moved,Mr.Streckenbein seconded that the Board release the drainage easement at the Commons to the Foundation. The motion carried unanimously. USE OF COUNTY LAB TO TEST WATER QUALITY SAMPLES IN LAKES Mr. Cravens moved,Mr.Streckenbein seconded that the County lab be used to collect and test water quality samples from the 30 designated lakes and report them to the Board on a quarterly basis beginning in 2016. The motion carried unanimously. INCLUSION OF LITTORAL PLANTINGS IN 2016 BUDGET Dr. Trecker indicated that these plants have been proven to be successful all over the state, and suggested that they split the cost into two years,with an amount of$7,500 to be put in the budget request for 2016. Ms. O'Brien asked that some input from the communities be obtained on littoral plantings as well. CHAIR'S COMMENTS JUNE MEETING Ms. O'Brien noted the items that will be addressed at the June meeting, including the FY 2016 budget, Ms. Goetz's recommendations for landscaping,the Oakmont Lake Pathway bids, the Oak Lake Sanctuary bid,the project manager position, water management and the calendar of meetings for the coming year. SUMMER BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE Ms. O'Brien suggested that no meeting be held in August, and asked the Board to let Ms. McCaughtry know if they will be unavailable for the June,July or September meetings. GULF BAY PROPOSAL FOR CHANGES TO MEDIANS NEAR WATERPARK PL Ms. Bush reported that she had heard from Gulf Bay's counsel that they are trying to prevent left turns at Gulf Bay. Mr. Dorrill indicated that he had received no information on this, but he had been advised that as a courtesy the PBSD would have an opportunity to review this before any material change is made. Mr. Dorrill will follow up with Mr. McKenna to determine where this issue stands at this point. WATER MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND FUNDING This item was to acknowledge the receipt of the materials that Mr. Bachman had requested, and Mr. Cravens indicated that he had problems with quite a bit of it in that he did not feel that the Board should be replacing anything on private property. Ms. O'Brien suggested that this item should be revisited. 8 Pelican Bay Services Division Regular Board Session Meeting Minutes May 6,2015 ADJOURNMENT Mr. Cravens motioned,Dr. Trecker seconded to adjourn the meeting at 4:19 p.m. The motion carried unanimously. 9 LANDSCAPE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT PBSD BOARD MEETING JUNE 3, 2015 The L&S Committee met at 3:00 PM on May 27, 2015 at the Pelican Bay Community Center. The following items were discussed: 1 . During public comment, it was pointed out that visibility at the Pebble Creek crosswalk is a problem due to median landscaping that is blocking adequate visibility of pedestrians in the crosswalk. PBSD Operations will rectify the problem by transplanting the plants and installing plants that will stay low, allowing for the proper visibility of pedestrians by motor vehicles. 2. Community complaints were voiced concerning the elimination of grass borders in some median and roadside areas and replaced by mulch. This view that the mulch is not esthetic and looks unkept will be addressed. 3. Extra police patrols were carried out this past season at the direction of PBSD Administrator, Neil Dorrill. The additional patrols gave Pelican Bay police protection and coverage from 5:00 PM to11 :00 PM. The PBSD FY2016 Budget includes funds to do the same next season. 4. The FY 2016 Budget, as passed by the Budget Committee, will allow the addition of a new Three Man Crew (full time) and One Temp. Worker to our Operations Dept. to bolster our existing full time employees and temporary workers. The L&S Committee requested that our Operations Dept. do a manpower assessment because adequate maintenance of Pelican Bay's landscape was not being done, creating major safety, line of sight, and esthetic problems. Although less than the manpower asked for, these additional employees will help greatly. The following motions were made and unanimously approved: Pertaining to the CIP Phase Three Plans to Re-Landscape the Medians on Gulfpark Drive and Six Medians on Pelican Bay Blvd. 1) " Recommend to the full board to declare a 1 yr. moratorium on Phase 3 of the landscaping proposal and use that year to re-evaluate to see if the goals are what they should be." Pertaining to the request from the Collier County Traffic Operations Dept. to advise them of our position on installing a Three-Way Stop at the intersection of North Pointe Dr. and Pelican Bay Blvd. 2) " Recommend to the full board that the PBSD recommend to the county not to install the 3-way stop at North Pointe Dr. and Pelican Bay Blvd." Submitted by: Joe Chicurel, PBSD Landscape & Safety Committee Chair CIP Landscape Goals 1 . Reduce water usage. 2. Eliminate old plantings that look unattractive. 3. Eliminate large areas of sod. 4. Use more native plants and add color. 5. Reduce manpower needs and therefore reduce labor costs. 6. Eliminate line of sight issues at intersections. Unintended Consequences and the Reality of Implementing the CIP Goals 1 . The old irrigation system designed for sod remained. The sod was re- moved and plants replaced large areas of sod. Drip style heads were not effective (nozzles clogged; couldn't be combined with spray heads). The old irrigation system could not accommodate serving all of the new plant- ings and sod simultaneously in a cost effective manner as hoped. 2. Water demands actually increased as new plants required more water. There were NO WATER SAVINGS. 3. LABOR COSTS and MANPOWER NEEDS ACTUALLY INCREASED: a. Weeding and mulching planted areas increased. b. Trimming and pruning plants increased maintenance costs. Areas of grass didn't require the added manpower requirements that the new beds of plants necessitated. 4. LINE OF SIGHT goals were not achieved at some key intersections and crosswalks. CO s"#'i =ja°0°"'3Nbld ONI1Nb'ld N`d143W woD•saidous6�p,(aiwoigq woo•saidous6�p zlao6a pow-3 woD•saidous6•m,' LL00•£b9.6£61 " a' ZO InV418o1d 'S3ldVN 'H1IOS 11381S H1N31 58I VaR101d'SDINN -s 'SNI SID91IHD21b' 3dVDSCINV1 S3811NV,a dYD 0111X3 3Ddld >R1VW2131VM H1flOS s o w m �� SJdOd1S+Z1J00 aJn3ou61 vion CI 19 AY9 NVDI13d - SNVI43W 9d 25i:,',-7- =a° °oh J Y 6 2 y o 0 '� 5 o 0 0 0 o °. 4= £ -, th o. u °- O c c , c a o 6, • o a 2 'n N 2 ° o �a_ s GJ N s_ m rn -- ` ° - Ytl A a v ▪ WNC) CI . 8 63 0. -.6. Y N E. N ` w w .p E m O 6 .O o o 0 o IS E o — 6. a V 0 XE >' W ° o_ °o Y O E o ✓ E E c o C7 a.. l E Q E s E E :° — >. 3 .E . c 0 ' d y y m n t o a y p o o i . ° E u. re w > 0 it in Q V N W 0 03 s Z o a a E o c a i o a uN ' .' oEo _ Vi ✓ f5 o ,' w °v o E _° o_ ° > N a _ 2 2 • 8 2- n 0 " • W mN m Y ° o w mi _ Vo 'nc5mco Y73 W % m ° o oTF1 CC .. o Y ° Oo °u- O Q H Q °Cm . < N V- N MI Z N �<< c a in QLLI / O H '/1 V1 '.1 8 P V ' of V O.' O O �/ :' - a h 0 Q Q ° o " � 1 c -3N/ i O -. ma a 3 \NJ�b "\ b'6 #� • u J- � -, #*�,##ss S 8 ` 3N/7/../..,----Z.-8 MiA,Ii ▪ °F // A, d .\ (ZOZ \ O w NC w 1 ® ) /7.0:40 07 /4.4.1t I . / jam,,'f �l �;.JA,�l 1ti:,: f •:, ��'%�/,` 1�.�.. V i • ri`� �'.,..4 � = Iiif :- I 1 ill >� III II o � :._ 1 it iI 0 di o hi II SRI 1118 ;fN I IIrt o iii 11 o Nli ,INI w°� ► la iii; zlll Z _. �m 1' '�Ilj j• lE 0,00 Q I v;'oo.o_ Oa d300 ...@ dor 00 ▪ ow 00 o'o o,© '�, oto o,© 1 +IliJ 00 ob " 11111. 0- ill " )I' 2 zN ©aok ©o J yi i1 I - w“ ©p) 0© [o �JII'' 00j y, 0 VIII. .V 0 )- 411:11 c 4 +1►'g0 Q t!.. di it �,,vA 'S •#}}{#F : 14110,6 E L6 14$04b/0 _ 3NI1HJlbW _ _ __!".211 '-NaoM o b - le),., Jo iiwn i 111111* ' W VA 44V 0 349 ' _ 1 - 3NI1HJjVW — # -"\---\_. zoz 1I Xd ; DV -1dXo N2IV W2131YM7.--- wo.. N1 (1 • woo•saidous6p,(alwoigy/ worsaidous6[]p zlao6a pow-3 LSI 4#1J-=4a00 um= NY1d ONI1NVld NVIa3W O. woo•saldous6•n+m4+4 LL00'£179'6£Z 1o " a' ZOIn£ VOINOId 'S3ldVN 'H1f1OS 133)15 H1N31 SH l �'" —I VOINOId'S31dVN s 1 *DNI S1D311HD IV 3dVDSGNV1 SIvwD/OavNO21OD 01 S3911NV,a dVD „ s ; " S3dO11S+Z13O0 amIou61saIoas *GA19 AV9 NVDI13d :SNVI43W 9d o=ar.o 6" o '� o O = c N d ° C a0 O O s a 3 - C O 'ry 0 O Ti Si 2 0 3 N - c 3 E a v o ° o :T 0 = 0 .n it a • '. S. o 14ll ! 1 -O o c o a ♦ a o o E o - .-- - `•0 •a o• `•0 N 'n rx a . 0 o •° C C m L- p W 0 o u u cE _ Z O E :o ° o°` v 'a a E la 0 `u- C .o o ' o •E u- N U ° u =5.,LL Z ° o -0 .o o y o't y c t. ' x _ a o o_ O 0 o . d, u°. r 0 z p m Q V O 1" 0_ p o o 0 a WU O = r a p p E IMIll I "O w " o. r E : ° E c o Ho r . a . a £ oau 0Oce co ,. x , a. V « O -5 o 9. v o a -7. E o 0 0:3 - ^. p vi m 6. E ° rnErn ° ga0'._ ov -9mp t aoy ` y v p o 5. V o a4 C 0 „ m ` ° vo 0 o — H4 umz : zZH o p E u o In 4 d LU N W ch (V ao a) n C O n 00 NI1HD1 W Qa v - o• °' Q ° aa e6 0 Z g 0 d 1 d ____:—____, kte ibl l 3 V N d d >i to��♦♦♦•♦• •. 1 V W V 0 L_ 6 1We3N11HD1VW O E' ;,,><�t,.: _ - Q N1Ni:14.....: Aga n 6 Do IVA > = co 'il i '♦{tea.l' Ili >— N r�''IV DI 1 1li (-- I III J >{�tfa411 , \ Iio ll�ll m \ Yi I`' iOO _I 1r41110.01 lajillnit At lir) ED `> ei :o z ♦i wi 01 fel ZE'u ifg iOl I 4 , p SII \tj i74411► Ili IIRI 4111::44111111k, MN; ti "Itiftlakq:A1 t!11 1#{;�V� • ,,,, „ •o 4 4l .1,,.....,11.11'=;11A..1 , 9111 L. , P Illi Ilk !:::01 „,i ♦�•,�♦tet+ ° ...♦.i.♦��: 0 , loos (72du 1) %!:!i = ♦.i!i":Ii .:N"i ei x O . vr•Oi HIHH I HIHI N INI11NI1HD1 Wd6 _ _. — = 7-g l3dNddJ •Gg911NtlIQ Q cl V 3NI1HJ1VW 9 6firsr 3NI1HD1d 11 worsatdous6@p/alwoigq/ worsaidous6@pzlao6a II°w-3 zS""'A"_'°°0"1..3 Ndld JNI1Ndld NVIa3W O wors01d0us6•m'nm LL00'£1,9•6EZ•i ZO t V£ VOIBOIA 'S3ldVN 'H1fOS 13381S H1N31 Se t d VOINOId'S3ldVN J 'DNI S1D31IHJ�V 3dVDSGNVlm °s 3J4121b17 01 Oa dNOdOJ 's ; S3dOdlS+Z13O0 am:ou6lS+gpas 'an19 AV9 NVDI13d :SNVI43W 9d =a� �oo �; 03 "o m E `u ,t a 3 3 ° o •3 E .o c'. .2 rn mo o w £ 0 0 S- S p M ° o .2 Q ._` • - p a E _. "O `v - c w Q Q o °- o •°„ a v h N N O O" 0 6 a O c 6 0 2 2 b .. `.3 E c �..1:�:: II -o°a' o a o`ii. o a o 0 0 0 ° E ,`d _ o. :11� ' N ,- W N `•O •7, o• o ro .2 a0 r `.o N o°e Q -o Q 1 Ink'Tani rn • i• L •a .9 U d d I m a ° o o .Z !n' m o ° E { o E ; O m Ja0 0 o a .' EE <l1 j Q t O co m ,, V s u' Z rn w vTI °i d U y .; . W `y 6 N 9 I w? "O 1 P. g- o O� O N O 3N11HD1VW Is _ '' 0° W > 6 -. z ? m z .. < u $1-0 l °ao . - - 'o p E 6 41m = u 0 ° - OM ,� Ou0 m p .' 1I : "E ,60 Tw m •.. . -G .o • x ., Eo Iil2 CcE N O x oco aP2v r o v o 0 0 o m v o 0"vOi EL o a ro - ° ° ` oEO' - w -E ° :nu o w s o E v - .<Oow ' Ha ? a z : z z z o N s 8 °" oaO0o Ooa Q 000000 l• W • n oK 0o F 0800 i0 Q o, ri Q MAKABELLA = g i U a 4401111k III) __-/ 117q0. 3NIlHJlb'W d_L t r. We li. cli 11 ,!...,,.4, 411 . u__,ii_ _ 7 ft t* m e � `e it J- - Nio �.til .T 5 'ji441CD A ooi©°�` _ of A 44 o I $fl N 0,;.:1:01 U 2 tit; �o „E ._ till Ill 4,1 in:::• 111111 .- I 1 :7; : *41 ?Iil[Lt„a d �00�� # #ii •pp: 711f; •ii�i! mi ° !�A•!• .011111.100. • • p .1111.4,1 •I ;p% 'i' d1139H21d W • 1451, I. iii �•OOi� 710111 Ii[ t••�•• --I iii/ii:.n4t aaniti A >•••� /I Illill ♦••♦ m SII'-":a::.i r:%i rii•r• )-- 'iii !il Q Il1111 11611, s;• fil'<<,:; 2 f 4 ...,,,,,,,,,1 iii t m viii Ilis OE Millik �;� — Iii 4iii ei _ -' iiia—VA. '-'!!! E f1!...111cl W LIIIyII illlil t . r o !mil 1 { o 3N11HJlVW v- -. 01 4'6 om w� -- -- 3NIlHJlb W 0ObN0 - 1....\ — 9-01 041 — i -- _ LS L L71d-7..0,q112 a— wos.seidous5@kaiwoAqq/ lll OD'S a i cl pus 6 g z la o 6a now-g NVld ONI1NV1d Nvia]w wos.sa1dous6,,,, LLOOTP9.6£6 1 s ;s '7 0- M WC VOI1O1J 'S31cl`dts1 'Hinos 199N1S 1-111,131 SR IV012101i'S31cIVN "?. ., —I CD :. ;2 "DNI SIDDIIHDdV DdVDSCINV1 0213N31NOW 01 30CIINVD i I. 00 s 2-• .-•z-- a. t n'„--3- 6 g SDd0211S+Z1A00 ...4..6 ,.., •CIA19 AV 9 NVDI13d :SNVICIDW 9d ; r; .' -. .v 0 -,s 2g emc' ' '- in . 0--' E0- , - 0 .. ,, E = 4 tr., 0 . . 2 -0 2.-- tal Lo _ a cy, r.3 ,2 .,•_- g 0. .,.:-= . = 0 r, 0 r, - c" • a v 73 = = 4,R .,? = . .- a - 0. g , 2 - -. Ts 13:, .L: aFk 2- . .9-, . --: . -D--- — . •t - I a.. c Q. c .a 4) 0 6 - ,i• i! 2. '0. .1 > 8-ii 0• 0 •-; .-; 6 ti .: .5 t:,.5 11... 3 .;12 0 6 o 0 c ..-- ii r r r r o or cl. ma 0- or o - 021gNg _I_ 1\101A1 t(3 _I u.. W c .2 On W O 't •,'! 1 i f, >-. 0 0 0''''''........ ......›..,N,.. 2 E O : c 2 R ' . 0 ` .3 "0 • 0- 3 E E -0 =▪ '5 o ,- T...i 0 u 1, •,-, ri, 2 ,. - •.. • a 2 T 0 IT_ 3.• 0 E.. z P P Z iii %i U -6.,'.2 V•40 Z o . `'.' '•:t1441' c0 0 .. , t: 7 . .E. P. .0 .3 ,.3'-' fp i r.4 I 2 (•-) 1 >... Z g .t° &.z... 8 7:= =-6.''''' . g i .g 8 -23, "MI g — 0 7, F. 3 , " 0 - E ...2 o E • ..., v, E 0 74 5:-." ,_ g E.,' kwtto 4 •241,r•J —1 Cogss .1.scu •-• likAT Al Z < E t_ t,, i0 o,. a - Egs, o ,. . .. ,„• .- 23, f3', 0 0 r.-- l° o,..G 8 I.S> Pt';0 ea ac -iiaa - r - wzibz . • . ° 1-1' a (IS n ti ... o, u •n ,, 2 = -a= -. - ` ,;.- ' ° 0.- a) -5 .a. a F .5 a— It•:' ..0 x .•,.. . ... ,„ ?. . ?- . ut * . : zz z ,.„, ,t ,.., f.- 3 9-. ,?, reVO va .., AO 4 iti < t•e.4 ,0 0. M v" f: '4 :8 2 ''' 2 .% R 2 L'A 0 ,, 01 . ',9 =g-8 .) a A414 1 co I-. g ::44-1 oe ' < 0 '- '' .••4 (tVAA ...4:.%. g D V -1 cl F- IPA N 0 I g -1 21 V 0 ( 0 _ , :2 _< •=,....4,44 ,-7. incl e iett4 , ' Sk't- ,' Pigh:41; ,. gi •' 0 , :0 t°04:=4 1 4 k.Je•tts.:1 1 lietk,4 e+''.'• wti E,,, linill ; • WV • tti:401"A 0 a 2jc i II Ord)A 0 21 gNgIN0IA1 111111111 '7E1! 10 id w'.0_ ttlkr,4 E, 14glim lw :Ta 6,.' ;4004 Ileg tOlit. jt"--;#1 >2 4*,00.- ;14tA 1 6 4 .. CL I. Wtt, Nall 11 0 j i 111 O Ilk 1r' 41.14,0 li ,,,1 011)88ihi 2 (111/111 11 A MAI T° iheditill - C-1?o41 1 >Di Ill lotfr),p- -AK 1 \; 4: Ft . -' "FP- = -*0111 0.174 C.) >- c rj. V.till - .1 41111101 .1 Itt al '' goo *o 1-,<-! kill twiipp . Ill I- A E24.434 < IWO' rz, 4013; 7 2n---1,4cit: . gft,lgig oirolest, — IL .44162 -.b''(' (1.4.4.441.C2461 —I 11,014 k....rn, . 2 W 7il 1 WiAtIA < .t{COARa I', Via in k i 1K41 '13 ''' '•4:4 ,, . gtt":1 I ''-- . ) "TO 'Z' 110•1V Z ' saL'Oi . n 2 et* < , 'AM le:74 igil ,=_, 4 ". ICA1, (-) .E.i>1 Itt.41? 1 i•i•:::>•: — F.' IV" ! 1 _I ‘°. 1 Iti.*:,-41 S Vi:1111 .*:.11 ' ,.....-....4,1 VA!! el :••: '40'4 4•4 e„•4 6...., . ...A." DNI1HD.I.VW 3N11HD1VW V-N -0-- _ _ . 8- D-oi L L 1 > 021gNg1N0V\I gDCIIIV1D _1 _ LSI 1#1A- .!113 C\I wop-soidous6gAalwoJqq/ tooD•saidous6pzteoBe How-3 NVld ON111\1,9,1(i INIVIG314/ wc..s.16°"5.^^^^", LLOOTP9.6E9.7 '‘. .' 7 n l PE VCJIZIOld 'S31dVN 1-111102 133212 HIN3.1.281 VCII2101d'231dVN cs) 'DNI S1D1LIHDdV 3dVDSONV1 3DNVd1N3 9111D 01 AVM 1NDC11211 ' S9dOellS+ZIJO0 0 1 niou6ls v pas gAIZIG >121Vd din° :SNVICI3W sEld aI1I-5 '1' 3 05 C.' `ii a = , t-, In O' OV ' .._ , t. 7.R- 0 — 0 ... z 0 £ v, . .. ' c :. , -- i., . a...v E a. -Pn "g ' c 5 _g --8 :0 .2 i -2 i un .2 "5 u?: 2 .1 . 71 g :f. , T, .E a .- ..,;* 44 -5 '5 --' c'' IC g ''.6 -2 •C g °' °I ';' ti: 3 g : -° 75 -2 ,k — - , ..,, . ,k . .1., zi . 6 t o o o .a 2 tO g E g a0 " 't u / ;4V. 1 / c c, ILI -0 D -o 0 a 0 e O E ‘; E 1 ' 9 g•1 .0 . i n E 8 E .r., 13 1 u',72 g -I Z 3471./ ii al 3 .- n - •= ... b D.Lw v. Ulu --- (c)( -0 > . E •.... ..... ..... >- .`-- 0 3 I- i; o -.5 < < -:`,' .t8 ..>_. .6 n .. .. E. 4..5. e 6- -dv. o :ig g ,t3E = ° 6 r. 'Ea cicEV b: 0 4, 5', .5 g 'E .-: 0- ..., 2 ,.;, 02v. v Vox 0 -.p., O 2 F2- ,-,-, A •.? -,,,, ,?- E T ;,, 08- 0 a ''' :2 ,i;i. 4 i! - 0- Do ca 2 g g R ? _.,0 ", 4; co ,8 - -E, •E 'f 2- a. 50 -5 C." 0 5 o 0 Z I.J N sTi. co . en l.) . 0 1-. N vl .a a. w u., a ..... a 43 N C 4 :..7 1, •- 1.-:i 0 V.. C...4. 4:* V4,441 I ' Itt,e4 ILL,ot > \, .../ 1 4 , *04, — 3N111-1DIVW — I _ 1 M — L __ •..: 0 r•:, 1 1, •' I CZ > • ; N•/4 < i 8 Ili) a_ t- 1 1 ! i(tt,•!.24Z4:S;4: CD 1 _41 *e. c! , 1 , i °I 60 6,a @ ..,% . 1 IS• 1 ,,, , I.,,,1 , , co S" ','`..44 .c?nil C) 11 ! 4;t4t: F, .'4416 L 0 \ 1 1 -,--, • 4 ititk: . ... . 1 , ..., :..x w. r., •444:40 .4, ., tie. f 8_-'-`L' :4461 ui s 0444 E,g,. * ill: -c.-, - :14M.:: > t.1 i.-...4• .s. •• et 4. \ Lu . 1 Itka 04,.1,44441.1\ oG -, Z IA:f --- 00,•Ipekt -g D 4941 r. Prailiii \ i - ;:::*4 ° \ %St •,.:, :4€44i 1. tteitlit , .4L fl_ 1 \g! 40 iiii U- - ., r ( , iSko 1) i 1Ng01 \A/211 0 0 0 g/1 / 3N11HD1Vrik_ I I 17 — g1 I I 0 / a , — — — i — — ------- 1 i i 'il-Z L o z • , ZgL L#14-.4..0.L113 cn wop•soidous6p/eituo.Jqy/ Luo0.seidous6zoo60 poLu-g NVld ONI1NV1d NVICI3W woxsaidouse,,/,v. LLOOT49.6CZ 0 EVE VCINOli 'S31dYN 'Hinos.1.33N1S HINaL ca l b .., VON 0-14'Sgidt/N -I ze '''- 9 '‘'.A 'DM SIDDIIHD21V DdVDSCINV1 33N1 N33NO 01 3DNVN1N3 9 n 1 D Sd0e1.1S+ZIROO a,n4o.6 ,,,as gA121C1 )121d Aino :SNVICIJW sEld , ,e, ,,,,, .00 ,5 5 :E -• ,- rt ° 0 a II. g .-',. -., ,,.. g ...,1 o . . - . in 'a • in . a--. a 1-, g _i• - 1 9 *1 .- - ° E N 0 - 5 -- g :...1 ... ,g o- g 5 :F., 2 . -0 " . , . :.. E E al.c 7,3- .9 e ...`r .,..; 6 6 6 2- 6 .13 ,a o 0 0 - .,?. ° •9 6 ',0 .cr -co 6 6 >' 22, T O - - - O 0 ci o 2 5 • 20- • .,-., '-o. . `•• a 7.. T5 = 2 . 8 1- c , a.) V 2 o 0 0 13 0 _c o E g ° !g •E "-°-6 g 2 E vc ji = O el E, ,- T., 3 0 -?- •,7, 0 / -0 w a; 0 g ,T, --''''''''...'....'"""s-''''''` '''''''''''''''''..".."'"".•,,\, ----"/ US" > r.,' Z 17. = t m -a ,„" "d 171"'... ," .' E 0 id ,,,_, 0 U 7- . . 8 0 =,,, C. . _y *E 0 ce -E 0 2 ° ' ' E ,•- 2 - 0 2 '2 l'-' i' .a, ' .g 2,- rct O 0 79_ -.... 0 ,r,-- „. , 2 , 7 - - ,,, 8 a cn .2 t ti., .- ' a .. n' .. .08, 0 o ° ; g 2 "- gT144 - kf g a n :3,,s . .s ro, , . 1, ..2 . 0., .6 -5 ts, c .',..' w 8 .12 2 -2 -g- g, .. .1. -g g . , _ I 8 9,-° I 0 * t3 ii .T, . . 9 2 . Ac." ._. I _. < - 0. . R CI 0 C/I/ / C U1 a .4 (.4 W < _ ct CY 41-- - II i- 0 2 II 1 i it. It •--J — —- -- 9£l _- - -- -- - ,...._ .,,,, - ..- -. -.. 31\111HD1VW II ° 1 .......o . - o z ___, I )IN,QA4 i dos, ›.1,<. ,41 .......,........7„ , .._ C11119 ' ii.-it; '.... ' •--. , 1 \ tu Of" ,t, 0 ;AV \ > °.'. / i .... . . t , ,., .11 ;;) D /.1 ( JP fir 1 ow ,,, (45",v i -:..„ i N ; ..? ), g q 1 ekop 0 0 9,00,P,4000 <t. , .:•:".4`. / .u., wer.-teVe I rA Z O'OPP/4:00) r::••• -.'3 ossoriede a- / L>.'0 043•4040 t , • / .., A-..•4: 0 a> OPtderdp ol 4:*."4 13-'t Vide/e):0 u_ .0 i -PA:pop 1 ikt.1 ostoec,0 \; CarCOP c'fi *OPPla 00f.C.Prcfc cp. 12 409 I I 0 I °,--2• WA„..43,1 T ., 8 440 \ • ,s•-, ,, k OS No 1 riol$4) i ,2., 4010 6 Wi D \ VW tat 0 4400 i to.•A 0 I tell A • ce, 2 4Aawire :- '•• 44-V., '2, I la "44•Sli" ,!:-, •••• i"4 ,_,_c. t4.4.40.4 ,,, Ar, ' ;$*1 %A *-4.*.40 Lu \ %vitt iv.tots„...s4 tax, Play)* › ) - \ \ lk, 74 CZ I iist 4), \ IA \ w.tx: , Av..% ... .,..4:" 0 1-$4) \ No.00,0 v, ogitiso- !sz ka ' "' cigetti,08 'E cl 00110,80b ‘,1 rz 0 0041111,kirob 0!7> :(?9 Cif PI!070 ..: ViCN \ , 0 CipiCiAb `'' < \ WA. \ $ ciPj0' .-,b. TE 30Ster .1 ,o• 0 - =0 t+A I 308% L3 ll-- 4 4 ,, 1•••,11!! s) 1 L,t, 2.00011 7, :tee D Ill 0* (...D 'n-i CO ,T ce'LC 2 iTI 0 0 ' Z ••••••• .-- D i-- -1 Z 3NIIHDIVW I U u_i 0 Co er County North Pointe at Pelican Bay Boulevard Multi-Way Stop Analysis Prepared by: Marlene Messam,P.E. Principal Project Manager I 1,• No a nies m tt y k % qui e '.. 1 N 3 Nt'44'11-1%11,IN tili 40 t A11)11, .,4 11 IAuthorized by: Collier County Growth Management Department Traffic Operations Section P.E. Registration No: 56499 Signature: Date: May 11, 2015 North Pointe Drive At Pelican Ray Boulevard May 1 I, 2015,TO#5334 BACKGROUND Due to a public request, the Traffic Operations Section of the Collier County Growth Management Department has conducted a Multi-Way Stop huersection Study at the intersection of Pelican Bay Boulevard and North Pohue Drive. The purpose of this study is to determine if the intersection meets warrant requirements for a multi-way stop installation as set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD). ,. 4. -,, ' I.4 . 0 : . "t 't� f4ttr. t' : t f4 Y 4 'p Figure 1,Study Intersection The MU TCD, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation is the national standard for traffic control devices. The Honda Department of Transportation has adopted the MU TCL as the State standard and it governs the placement and design of traffic signals, signs, and pavement markings on public and private roads within the suite. MUTCD Warrants for Multi-1Vay. Stop Signs: The MUTCD states the following support statements for the use of multi-way Stop. "Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with mu1Ii-way Kiops include lieclehtria.nh, bicyclists, and a]1 road users expecting c?tlier risk]!herr, to stop. Multi-way stop control is used Where the volume of traffic on the intersecting rracls is approximately equal" The MUTCD provides the following guidance statements- 1 The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way Stop sign installation: A. tVhere traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a I2-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volumes entering the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour(vph)for any 8 hours of an average day,and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches)average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour,but 3. If the 85-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum volume warrant is 70%of the above values. When the 85 percentile speed exceeds 40 mph, the traffic volumes on the major street should be at least 210 vehicles per hour fur cit;V d/Miry tincl thy trek volumes on the minor strc'clt Ahvulcl b4 tit kat 110 vehicles per hour fOr the same 8 hours. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, 0.1, and C'.2 are all satisfied to 80% of the minimum values,Criteria C.3 is excluded from this condition. STUDY DETAILS Kristina Road Characteristics This intersection lies within the Pelican Bay sub-division. The Pelican Bay sub-division is located in the northwest quadrant of US 41(Tamiami Trail)and Seagate Drive(CR. 896)and bordered on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. Pelican Bay Boulevard is the major street and is a divided 4-lane sub-urban roadway, and is functionally classified as a local collector. There are dedicated westbound and eastbound left turn lanes at the intersection to North Pointe Drive. fine medians on the svest and east legs of the intersection have street lighting and,arc heavily landscaped and well maintained. Sightlines when measured from a safe stopping position, before entering the intersection were clear for all movements of traffic(Photo#land#2). North Pointe Drive is the minor street and is a four-lane divided suburban roadway which transitions to a two-lane undivided roadway beyond the intersection approach. It is functionally classified as a local road. it is stop controlled at Pelican Ray Boulevard. There is a dedicated southbound tell turn lane, and a dedicated southbound right turn lane. 'Ihe median has lighting and is heavily landscaped and well maintained. The line of sight from the stopline on the north leg looking east and west is clear for all movements of traffic(Photo p3). Pelican Bay Boulevard and North Pointe Drive both have posted speed limits of 30 mph. 2 • .„ • . - - t 4 'fr,, • ,,,,,,',- • • iP4,ta -.. ,1 -' - - i ii qt -pir , t • s , ..; -'''''''1° , iE;''ro.,-, ,,i,,..,„;,,,,f' ,,_ , „,- , , , ,• ;:.,,..:::::.;.:,:, - ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:, '..,-,--N7j0,',2,::, .,,, ''Pr'',,°::„:„::,-:-,,!'---I-S,',-7.,:if,i,':':28,';„:';,•„:<.'0„„:salf:4410‘,.•,:, Photo 1 i it lookin- 0 west• • 4 n H BM L"‘(1„tn t P elica - from I-I I-ern n # - Ale‘v tedi:tn nose I( . . ,.. . .... • . . . .., ,ANA -• 11-Abe°.,°'''..--°,'-' -" ..,, ' : I.Sentef _ -. 1..-iew ot l'elicall Photo tt2: BaN Blvd.: leob.... ea‘it 3 *,-;, --„, - ...:, -- . - .,, � 1. 'fir '' .l r .' a ` Photo#3- View of Nortit Pointe Drive from sidewalk on snuthside; and looking north. Traffic is Volume Warrant 24-hour traffic volume counts were collected begimtutg on February 12, 2015 through Febntary 13, 2015. The drita collected includes traffic approaching from all directions at the intersection_ The data with the highest hourly traffic vvluincs tut surrurttuicccl in FiKun 2 turd 3. The traffic data showed that Pelican Ray Rotilevarcl(Major Street]has aariafied the 1�1iJT(T)minimum volume! warnmi, Ciil.eria Cl fuer flhRL iu:,. H7rr Ncn'1h Ptrinle Delve (Mincer Slreel.) the traffic data the tnirtinutm volume.~ warrant is riot met lir Criteria C2 Ibi the saute 8 hours.IIowever., �zrtce ttte 85 pr rtierilile speed on Pelican Bay Rcmlevarrl exceeds 40 mph, Criteria C3 hats been satisfied Vehicular volume warrant. has been met at this intersection. Pelican Bay Boulevard Vehicles per Hour(VPH)-Major Street Interval(flours) Both Approaches 1113 Wl! 10:00-11:00AM $75 519 456 11:00 12:00 PM 1,105 602 503 12:00-1:00PM 1,111 601 510 1:00-2:00 PM 1,027 512 515 2:00 3:00 PM 1,103 599 504 3:00-1:00 PM 1,120 651 169 1:00-5:001'M 1,167 639 528 5:00-6.00 PM 933 532 1101 6:00-7:001'M 673 389 281 7:00-8:01 I'M 459 2.54 206 5:00-9:00I'M 359 116 213 Figure 2 intersection Approach Volumes,Pelican Ray Boulevard 4 North Pointe Vehicles per Hour(VPH)=Minor Street Interval(Hours) Both Approaches SHICI SHIA' 10.00-11.00 AM 170 149 21 11:00-12:00PM 190 167 25 12:00-1:00 PM 178 154 24 1:00-2:00 PM 163 143 20 2:00-3:00 PM 161 131 30 3:00 4:00 PM 167 140 27 4:00-5:W PM 151 125 26 5:00-6:00 PM 165 136 29 6:00 7.00 PM 138 104 34 7:00-8.00 PM 80 64 16 8:00-9.00 PM 63 54 9 Figure 3 Intersection Approach Volumes,North Pointe Drive Field Observations On May 11, 2015,field observations were taken duringthe hours of10:00 AM to 11:30 AM at the subject intersection. Photographs of the study intersection are provided below. es .1111.1115 ,.. ' -le et lr ra t. $ .11010# 4: Nortimevt earner of Pelican Ba 3 and North Point Drive. All the traffic signs :eiptiaininittiohnishieititneeresencttilioensiaoir.)eboanr adnecdotih•aetch;e0spithiskd'(floheesse si2ris are not County maintained. The not meet the 4-foot MUTCD requirement. 5 ' di ald e a,}t i F # h' x • w R `$' • fear ,R` s 4444 ...-,n4.&., aMA 1 i Photo#5: Ansvhall sidewalk is oroYided on all legs of the intersection (curb cut ra�mns are concrete).ADA mats are also in mace. *` HERE .. , 01 c:s A x k:4,4 ,L. or , ktrot.,--. , , , ,,..-rs,,r4-' .z4.1... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,, ., ,, .,,„,,...„„.. _ ,I ,_4,...r.„--,,,T,,,,,,,_:- __, , , ..,., t _,-- - : . . _,- +.:„.,,,,„,„ , ,„„..„....,. , , ----,e'' ::14.1.F....r*.L.F.:,,,n,,,....„,,,,,,,, ' Photo# 6 - Bicyclists are frequentl4 seen along Pelican Bay .Kouleaaril. 6 Crash History Warrant The intersection crash history was reviewed from 2005 to present(Appendix B.). During this ten year period,there were less than five recorded crashes for any given year. To meet the crash warrant for a multi-way stop,the I+AUTCD requires 5 or more crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop application. The crash history of this intersection does not meet the warrant for a multi-way stop sign installation. Intersection Sight Distance The Traffic Engineering Handbook identifies that motorists approaching intersections should have a sufficient,unobstructed view of the intersection and approaches. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)provide standards and guidelines regarding intersection sight distance. The AASHTO model for sight distance (Figure 4)provides a method to determine the sight distance available for a given intersection. For this location,letters"a and"b" would be approximately a— 14.5' and b—345',respectively. qscois a S l 1 i .4—...— b - '-I 1 b Malar Road Maus Road Ir. s a 1 Irian tp J �" -- 4 .c....Sight Triangle- Clear Sight g -1 t Decision Point D chion Point dear SightTrienaio far Viewing dear Sight Triangle for ViCwing Traffk Approaching from the l.eeft 11'affic Approaching from the Right Figure 4,AASHTO Model for Intersection Sight Distance An engineering field review has shown that the study intersection appears to have adequate line of sight distance. Warrant requirement for intersection sight distance(Option)is not met. CONCLUSION&RECOMMENDATION Based on the traffic volumes, crash history review,and intersection sight distance,it is determined that the subject intersection does meet MUTCD requirements for multi-way stop control and; it is therefore recommending that multi-way stop control be installed at this intersection. 7 APPENDIX A Traffic Volume Counts Collier County Transportation Department Traffic Operations Technidan:Luis Trujillo LOCATION : NORTH POINTE OR Sac:211150020002 CROSS ST :S8 APPROACH TO PELICAN BAY BLVD 2/12/2015 CITY : NAPLES Th inky 24 Hour Vokrme(Volume factor 0.500) Irterval Start SORT 581.9 Carbine* Interval Start SORT SILT Co bred 12:00 AN 2 5 0 0 2 5 11•.10 PM 36 154 8 24 44 176 volume Totals 12:15 AM 0 0 0 12:15 PM 31 4 35 12:30 AM 1 0 1 12:30 PM 40 6 46 MT SW Combined 12:45 AM 2 0 2 1215 M4 47 6 53 12:00 AM-12:00 PM 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 PM 39 143 4 22 43 163 654 91 745 1:15 AN 0 0 0 1:15 PM 32 8 40 (87.8%) (12.2%) 1:30 Al 0 0 0 1:30 PM 36 6 42 1:45 AM 0 0 0 1:45 PM 36 2 38 12:00 PH-12:00 AM 2:00 AM 0 C 0 1 0 1 210 PM 38 134 9 30 47 164 1110 224 1339 2:15 AN 0 0 0 2:15 PH 32 2 34 (829,) (17.1%) 2:30 AN 0 0 0 2:30 PM 35 9 44 24 Hd.Na 2;45 AH 0 1 1 215 PN 29 10 35 17644 320 2084 3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 3:00 PM 39 140 6 27 45 167 3:15AM 0 0 0 3:15PN 29 10 39 (846 (15.49b) 3:30 AA 0 0 0 3.30 PN 38 S 43 3:45 AM 0 0 0 3:45 PM 34 6 40 4:00 AM 2 2 0 1 2 3 4J20 PM 33 125 7 26 40 153 Peak HOOTS 4:15 AN 0 0 0 4:15 PM 36 a 44 4:30 AM 0 1 1 430 PM 19 4 23 4:45 AM 0 0 0 4:45 PM 37 7 44 I2.110 AM• __IM4 5:00 A18 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 38 136 6 29 44 165 SORT SILT Coadlioed 5:25 AM 0 0 0 5:15 PM 24 9 33 5:30 AN 0 0 0 5:30 PM 40 10 50 Starred 5145 AN 0 0 0 5:45 PM 34 4 36 10:45 AM 10:45 AM 10:45 AM 6:00 AM 0 5 0 1 0 6 6:00 PM 35 104 5 34 40 138 Val 645 AN 1 0 1 6:15 PM 24 11 75 172 29 201 6:30 AM 2 0 2 6:30 PM 19 6 25 6:45 AM 2 1 3 6:45 PH 26 12 38 Factor 719 AN 8 56 2 9 10 65 7:04 PM 22 64 4 16 26 80 0.93 0.66 0.93 735 AN 10 0 10 7:15 PH 12 4 16 7:30 AM 12 2 14 7:30 PH 70 3 23 7:4501 26 5 31 7:45 PM 10 5 15 .11111/8:1110/ 82 14,1 26 116 I 18 34 134 6:06 744 12 54 2 9 14 63 SBRT $ILT Combined 8:15A14 19 4 24 8:15 PM 17 0 07 Raded 0:30 AN 31 4 35 8:30 PH 11 5 16 8:45 AH 40 2 42 9:45 PM 14 2 16 12:30 PM 2:30 014 12:30 PM 9:00 AM 42 154 2 15 44 164 9:001M 7 29 1 5 s 34 Volume 4:15 AM 38 7 45 9:15 PN 8 2 10 158 35 182 9:30 AN 32 0 32 9:30 PM 12 2 14 9.45 AX 42 6 43 4:45 PM 2 0 2 Fatt6r 10:00 AM 33 149 8 21 41 170 10:00 M 9 20 4 8 13 28 0.84 0.4 0.86 10:15 Al ?S 1 30 10:15 PM 1 3 4 10:30 AM 42 8 50 10:31 PM 5 0 5 10:45 AM 39 4 43 1145 PM 5 1 6 200 AM 46 167 6 23 52 192 11:00PM 4 7 0 1 4 1 11:1501 44 B 51 11:15 PM 3 0 3 11:30 414 43 11 S4 11:30PM 0 0 0 11:45 AM 34 0 34 11:45 PM 0 1 1 1 -Yn "::.:..C:.4' M;iY�,'.-._...r..«—sMda,.liiiNNA�Y'+Sda`m•�wT<$k`'.�:1^ .:af:.�cve^.�_....._ ... Collier County Transportation Department Traffic Operations Technician: Luis Trujillo LOCATION : PELICAN BAY BLVD Site: 211150020003 CROSS ST : ES APPROACH TO NORTH POINTE DR 2/1212015 CITY : NAPLES ThUrsdAy 24 Hour Volume,per Channel(Volume factor 0.500) EB Interval Start Interval Start 12:00 AM n "3 13 12:00 PM 136 601 17:15 AM 4 12:15 PM 163 12:30 AM 3 12:30 PM 150 12:45 AM 3 12:45 PM 152 1:00 AM 6 8 1:00 PM 135 512 1:15 AM 1 1:15 PM 105 1:30 AM 0 1:30 PM 130 1:45 AM 1 1:45 PM 142 2:00 AM 0 1 2:00 PM 151 599 2:15 AM 0 2:15 PM 135 2:30 AM 1 2:30 PM 148 2:45 AM 0 2:45 PM 165 3:00 AM 0 0 3:00 PM 166 651 3:15 AM 0 3:15 PM 177 3:30 AM 0 3:30 PM 162 3:45 AM 0 3:45 PM 146 4:00 AM 2 5 4:00 PM 160 639 4:15 AM 0 4:15 PM 176 4:30 AM 1 4:30 PM 144 4:45 AM 2 4:45 PM 159 5:00 AM 2 4 5:00 PM 132 532 5:15 AM 1 5:15 PM 144 5:30 AM 0 5:30 PM 142 5:45 AM 1 5:45 PM 114 6:00 AM 7 28 6:00 PM 110 389 6:15 AM 7 6:15 PM 101 6:30 AM 5 6:30 PM 104 6:45 AM 9 6:45 PM 74 7:00 AM 22 150 7:00 PM 86 253 7:15 AM 20 7:15 PM 54 7:30 AM 44 7:30 PM 67 7:45 AM 64 7:45 PM 46 8:00 AM 71 319 8:00 PM 38 146 8:15 AM 74 8:15 PM 42 8:30 AM BO 8:30 PM 32 8:45 AM 94 8:45 PM 34 9:00 AM 120 517 9:00 PM 30 107 9:15 AM 127 9:15 PM 36 9:30 AM 144 9:30 PM 16 9:45 AM 126 9:45 PM 25 10:00 AM 112 519 10:00 PM 44 120 10:15 AM 122 10:15 PM 40 10:30 AM 157 10:30 PM 18 10:45 AM 128 10:45 PM 18 11:00 AM 132 602 11:00 PM 6 37 11:15 AM 164 11:15 PM 22 11:30 AM 144 11:30 PM 5 11:45 AM 162 11:45 PM 4 24 Hour Total 6752 11:00 AM-12:00 PM 2:00 PM-12:00 AM 12 Hour Count 2166 12 Hour Count 4586 Peak Hour 11:00 AM Peak Hour 2:45 PM Peak Volume 602 Peak Volume 670 Factor 0.92 Factor 0.95 1 Collier County Transportation Department Traffic Operations Technician: Luis Trujillo LOCATION : PELICAN BAY BLVD Site: 211150020004 CROSS ST : WB APPROACH TO NORTH POINTE DR 2/12/2015 CITY : NAPLES Thursday 24 Hour Volume, per Channel(Volume factor 0.500) WB Interval Start Interval Start 12:00 AM 2 13 12:00 PM 138 510 12:15 AM 4 12:15 PM 121 12:30 AM 2 12:30 PM 128 12:45 AM 5 12:45 PM 123 1:00 AM 1 2 1:00 PM 1.46 515 1:15 AM 0 1:15 PM 127 1:30 AM 1 1:30 PM 116 1:45 AM 0 1:45 PM 126 2:00 AM 0 3 2:00 PM 124 504 2.:15 AM 1 2:15 PM 136 2:30 AM 0 2:30 PM 124 2:45 AM 2 2:45 PM 120 3:00 AM 1 2 3:00 PM 118 469 3:15 AM 0 3:15 PM 114 3:30 AM 1 3:30 PM 117 3:45 AM 0 3:45 PM 120 4:00 AM 1 6 4:00 PM 158 528 4:15 AM 2 4:15 PM 133 4:30 AM 2 4:30 PM 121 4:45 AM 1 4:45 PM 116 5:00 AM 0 8 5:00 PM 91 401. 5:15 AM 0 5:l5 PM 104 5:30 AM 3 5:30 PM 102 5:45 AM 5 5:45 PM 104 6:00 AM 2 29 6:00 PM 93 264 6:15 AM 4 6:15 PM 75 6:30 AM 10 6:30 PM 52 6:45 AM 13 _ 6:45 PM 64 7:00 AM 18 145 7:00 PM 57 206 7:15 AM 32 7:15 PM 60 7:30 AM 41 7:30 PM 41 7:45 AM 54 7:45 PM 48 8:00 AM 64 239 8:00 PM 50 213 8:15 AM 56 8:15 PM 56 8:30 AM 52 8:30 PM 52 8:45 AM 67 8:45 PM 55 9:00 AM 82 376 9:00 PM 37 139 9:15 AM 90 9:15 PM 58 9:30 AM 100 9:30 PM 22 9:45 AM 104 9:45 PM 22 10:00 AM 105 456 10:00 PM 33 72 10:15 AM 134 10:15 PM 22 10:30 AM 104 10:30 PM 11 10:45 AM 113 10:45 PM 6 11:00 AM 128 503 11:00 PM 14 35 11:15 AM 114 11:15 PM 8 11:30 AM 127 11:30 PM 9 11:45 AM 134 11:45 PM 4 24 Hour Total 5658 12:00 AM-1.2:00 PM 12400 P/4-12:00 AM 12 Hour Count 1782 12 Hour Count 3876 Peak Hour 11:00 AM Peak Hour 3:45 PM Peak Volume 503 Peak Volume 532 Factor 0.94 Factor 0.84 1 Collier County Transportation Department Traffic Operations Technician: Luis Trujillo LOCATION : PIPER BLVD Site: 420150010003 CROSS ST : PB APPROACH TO PALM RIVER BLVD 4/29/2015 CITY : NAPLES Wednesday 24 Hour Volume, per Channel(Volume factor 0.500) ES Interval Start Interval Start 10:30 AM 3 10:30 PM 1 10:45 AM 8 10:45 PM 1 11:00 AM 13 29 11:00 PM 0 0 11:15 AM 4 11:15 PM 0 11:30 AM 8 11:30 PM 0 11:45 AM 4 11:45 PM 0 12:00 PM 6 26 4/30/2015 12:00 AM 0 2 12:15 PM 8 12:15 AM 1 12:30 PM 9 12:30 AM 1 12:45 PM 3 12:45 AM 0 1:00 PM 5 25 1:00 AM 0 3 1:15 PM a 1:15 AM 2 1:30 PM 7 1:30 AM 1 1:45 PM S 1:45 AM 0 2:00 PM 1 16 2:00 AM 1 1 2:15 PM 6 2:15 AM 0 2:30 PM 3 2:30 AM 0 2:45 PM 6 2:45 AM 0 3:00 PM 9 19 3:00 AM 0 0 3:15 PM 4 3:15 AM 0 3:30 PM 4 3:30 AM 0 3:45 PM 2 3:4S AM 0 4:00 PM 4 22 4:00 AM 1 2 4:15 PM 7 4:15 AM 0 4:30 PM 6 4:30 AM 0 4:45 PM 5 4:45.AM 1 5:00 PM 3 20 5:00 AM 0 3 5:15 PM 6 5:15 AM 1 5:30 PM 3 5:30 AM 1 5:45 PM 8 5:45 AM 1 6:00 PM 6 26 6:00 AM 2 16 6:15 PM 7 6:15 AM 4 6:30 PM 6 6:30 AM 4 6:45 PM 7 6:45 AM 6 7:00 PM 3 17 7:00 AM 2 29 7:15 PM 5 7:15 AM 8 7:30 PM 3 7:30 AM 5 7:45 PM 6 7:45 AM 14 8:00 PM 1 9 8:00 AM 7 29 8:15 PM 4 8:15 AM 12 8:30 PM 2 8:30 AM 4 8:45 PM 2 8:45 AM 6 9:00 PM 2 6 9:00 AM 5 22 9:15 PM 3 9:15 AM 4 9:30 PM I 9:30 AM 8 9:45 PM 0 9:45 AM 5 10:00 PM 0 4 10:00 AM 2 6 10:15 PM 2 10:15 AM 4 24 Hour Total 343 j2:00AM-12:00PM 12:00 PM- 12:00 AM 12 Hour Count 153 12 Hour Count 190 Peak Hour 7:30 AM Peak Hour 5:45 PM Peak Volume 38 Peak Volume 27 Factor 0.68 Factor 0.84 APPENDIX B Crash History Co er County North Pointe at Pelican Bay Boulevard Multi-Way Stop Analysis Prepared by: Marlene Messam,P.E. Principal Project Manager # " J - - a . _r e -. . - { J K Pr + .(1) . �` �. s i -.... -,..d..- - --,..,4-,-,--4 pyUfa 4a k R d r`',, ' i..-N, - �ry iah.+ + _ ,co `'t " -,,p..1% -�.'_ , �a1�, � '��� �. r -i w �1a %c3C Authorized bv: Collier Counts Gro"th Management Department Traffic Operations Section P.E. Registration No: 56499 Signature: 11, 2015 Date: May North Pointe Drive At Pelican Bay Boulevard May 11, 2015,TO#5334 BACKGROUND Due to a public request, the Traffic Operations Section of the Collier County Growth 1lrfanagement Department has conducted a Multi-Way Stop Intersection Study at the intersection of Pelican Ray Boulevard and North Pointe Drive. The purpose of this study is to determine if the intersection meets warrant requirements for a multi way stop installation as set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD). C y S l a i t 1 ... - #.ate , _ m. 1 ' Gt.)) 1t.1 Figure 1,Study Intersection The MU TCD, published by the U.S. Department of'1'ranspontation is the National standard far traffic control devices. The Florida Department of'1'ml>spartatioii leas adopted the MU'1'C:ll tis the State standard turd it governs the placement and design of traffic. signals, signs, and pavement markings on public and private roads within the suite. MU'rCll Warrants for 1'wlulti-%Vay Stop Suns: The MIJT[T)states the following support statements for the use of multi-way Stops: "Multi-way stop cnrrltml can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with tnull.i-way' stops include lreclesiria.nr;,l icyeliM.S, and all it*adl ILSeis expecIlirg otbei 1(5111 ILhei to tulip. P fILltl-way stop control is used where the volume llf tr:3.ic on the int.ersecti nS roads is approxi mately'equal" The MUTC.'D provides the followingguidance statenicilts 1 The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way Stop sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can he installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation cif the traffic control signal. 13. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-and left-Burn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volumes entering the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour(vph)for any 8 hours of an average day,and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches)average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour,but 3. If the 85-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum volume warrant is 70%of the above values. When the 85 percentile speed exceeds 40 mph, the traffic volumes on the nuyor street should be at least 210 vehicles per hour for arp Zr hours um(thr trcifflc volumes on the minor curet should be ut(rota t 140 vehicles per hour jnr the same 8 hours. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80%of the minimum values,Criteria C.3 is excluded from this condition. STUDY DETAILS Existing Road Characteristics This intersection lies within the Pelican Bay sub-division. The Pelican Bay sub-division is located in the northwest quadrant of US 41(Tamiami Trail)and Seagate Drive(C.R. 896)and bordered on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. Pelican Bay Boulevard is the major street and is a divided 4-lane sub-urban roadway, and is functionally classified as a local collector. There are dedicated westbound and eastbound left turn lanes at the intersection to North Pointe Drive.'The medians on the west and cast legs of the intersection have street lighting and, are heavily landscaped and well maintained. Sightlines when measured from a sale stopping position, before entering the intersection were clear for all movements of traffic(Photo#land#2). North Pointe Drive is the minor street and is a four-lane divided suburban roadway which transitions to a two-lane undivided roadway beyond the intersection approach. It is functionally classified as a local road. it is stop controlled at Pelican Bay Boulevard. There is a dedicated southbound lett turn lane, and a dedicated southbound right turn lane. The median has lighting and is heavily landscaped and well maintained. The line.of sight from the stopline on the north leg looking east and west is clear for all movements of traffic(Photo#3). Pelican Bay Boulevard and North Pointe Drive both have posted speed limits of 30 mph. 2 • ----ferie^-• -;•*••4•i=", • , • • , 2 : F7i4. liP111111 4 ` '1! s I 440/ •.].."4 . • • eastern median nose at Pelican Bay Blvd, and looking west. • • „.4 .Photo#2: N'iew of Pelican BaN, IHVII. lookin_o east 3 Y °e ' w e ag s°t°a kip , m 3 Photo#3-View of North Pointe Drive from sidewalk on ssutltside:and looking north. 1.raffle Volume Warrant 24-hour traffic volume counts were collected beginnuig, on February 12, 2015 through February 13, 2015. The data collected includes traffic approaching from all direction.at.the intersection. The data with the highest bonny tmtlic volumes arc sumruntuitcxl in Figures 2 said 3. The traffic data showed that Pelican Ray Rotilet'ard(Major Street.:)has satisfied the%f1JTCT) minimum volumes wlnrinl., Criteria C for 8-fkiitts. Ka- Ncn-lh Pontile 1)-rive (Mucic Street.) the traffic dnil.a the tnininuam vuhtriei wauratd is not met lbr Crites a C2 for the sauce 8 bomb.However. since the 85 percentile speed on Pelican Bay Rdmlevard exceeds 40 mph, Criteria C3 has been satisfied_ Vehicular volume warrant has been met at this intersection. Pelican Bay Boulevard Vehicles per Hour(VPH)-Major Street Interval(hours) Both Approaches 1.CB WLt 1(1:00—11:00 AM 075 .510 456 11:00 12:00 PM 1,105 602 503 12:00-1'00 PM 1,111 601 510 1:00-2:00PM 1,027 512 515 2:00 3:00PM 1,103 599 504 3:00—1:00 PM 1,120 651 469 1:0U-5:001'M 1,167 635 528 5;00-6:04 PM 933 532 101 6:00-7:00 I'M 673 389 281 7:00-8:00 PM 459 25:3 206 8:00-9:00 PM 359 116 213 Figure 2 Intersection Approach Volumes,Pelican Ray Boulevard 4 North Pointe Vehicles per Hour(VPH)=Minor Street interval(Hours) Both Approaches SBRT SBL'l 10.00-11:00 AM 170 149 21 11:00-12:00 PM 190 167 25 12:00-1:00 PM 178 154 24 1:00-2:00 PM 163 143 20 2:00-3:00k'M 161 131 30 3:00 4:00 PM 167 140 27 4:00-5:00 PM 151 125 26 3:00-6:00 PM 165 136 29 6:00 7.00 PM 138 104 34 7:00-8:00 PM 80 64 16 8:00-9:OOPM 63 54 9 Figure 3 Intersection Approach Volumes,North Pointe Drive Field Observations On May 11, 2015,field observations were taken during the hours of 10:00 AM to 11:30 AM at the subject intersection. Photographs of the study intersection are provided below. xit 11101111111111 t 1 �rt1 PhOl Ott 4: Northwest corner of Pelican Bay Blvd. and North Point DriVC. All the traffic signs within this intersection are on decorative posts. These suns are not County maintained. The separation belAveen the soon bar and the crosswalk does not meet the 4-foot MIPTC"I) requirement. 5 ,, . .. . 7.47itit'el.,...;..;:,10." ,. , .. . . ,.. . ` ' ... , . _ .. .•44.;31.x.,. -4,.. _ ' •-:'0;0**:•44'0:'' - -: '''..v..-14,i,41*.,• • ,•,':;‘,.- - • --. '''''.11"41,4,C:1•''.'-' ',"°''''..'. "• r; .-- — -: ' ti.c• 1 :ifilii‘itil:"..!.; :':''':•:'''- ",.;•,:•:,,7 S.';::::''''..,-..:P.S 43\-•:;7,7°- • - . ._ • '.'2"•-•.4:,..'",.i.„.',4i4....!'• ' ' Photo#5: An Asphalt sideNrAlk is DroNided on all legs of lite intersection (curb cut ramps are concrete). ADA mats at'e also in place. ,... € HERE - ) 4 ii 4." ' • *: 1., 'f. ,, ,:,-... , _ , _ ....",:: i '.., _..., _'777, - - ,.._,„..4,. . '1 -°- :ed..-- it/t i 1 —19116.- ... Photoff 6 - RicN-clists are frequently seen 1-tiong Pelican Bay,. iloillevard. 6 Collier County Collision Diagram PELICAN BAY BLVD a®NORTH POINTE DR Dale: 0110112005- 0212812015 Total Diagrammed:2 -Legend 2-3 81 81 4-5 y, e a Y 6-10 Note: these are the only crashes in our >10 database between January,2005 and February,2015 Total Fatalities: 0 Total Injures: 0 Total Motorcycle i II Crashes: 0 FM O 12113106 sNI 1(2112015 Prepared by: i E NANCY FRYE 0511212015 PELICAN BAY BEACH RENOURISHMENT TO: PBSD Directors FROM: Dave Trecker Chair, ad hoc Beach Renourishment Committee DATE: May 19, 2015 The following material was assembled for the ad hoc Beach Renourishment Committee meeting on May 26 and subsequent PBSD board meeting on June 3. By way of background, the PBSD was assigned responsibility for renourishing the Pelican Bay beach by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in 2013 (Attachment 1). Acceptance and terms are spelled out in Attachment 2. Additional background information is given in Attachments 3 & 4. The current county policy is to renourish the beaches annually by sand haul to a maximal width of 100 feet. The rationale is to keep up with erosion on an annual basis, repairing "hot spots" (areas of severe erosion) every year, rather than to undertake a big renourishment every six years, as had been done in the past. A survey of Collier County beaches was recently completed by Humiston & Moore. The survey showed there was minimal erosion and no obvious "hot spots" since the 2014 renourishment. Accordingly, the Coastal Advisory Committee unanimously voted on 5/14/15 to recommend to the BCC that no renourishment be carried out this year. The Humiston & Moore survey included the Pelican Bay beach. See Attachment 5 for an aerial photo, with the R markers indicated, and Attachment 6 for beach width data. Based on the survey results, the average beach width in the section for which we have responsibility (from between R-31/R-32 to R-41) is 114 feet. There are no areas of severe erosion. There is an average loss of 6.5 feet between R-34 and R-37, but littoral drift from either the north or south, where there is an abundance of sand, is likely to rebuild that section. The PBSD board policy has been to accept county design standards (e.g., 100 foot beach width) and piggyback on county renourishment projects, rather than go it alone. On that basis, we would undertake no sand renourishment this year. If we were to go it alone and bring R-34 to R-37 to a 100-foot width, we would need about 1,500 cubic yards of sand. According to Gary McAlpin, director of Coastal Zone Management (CZM), that would cost about $50 per cubic yard or $75,000. That would cover sand, trucking and spreading. According to McAlpin, we would also have to spend about $50,000 for engineering costs, monitoring, reporting and certification. If we choose to go it alone, we would have to seek approval from the BCC in June and notify CZM so it could make arrangements with the sand quarry and file a Notice to Proceed. The ad hoc Beach Renourishment Committee should be prepared at its May 26 meeting to make a recommendation to the PBSD board on how to proceed. ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -61 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2002-27, AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE PELICAN BAY MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT, BY AMENDING SECTION FOUR, PURPOSE AND POWERS, TO CLARIFY THAT BEACH RENOURISHMENT IS ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF THE UNIT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 28, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners (Board), adopted Ordinance No. 2002-27, which superseded, repealed, and consolidated prior ordinances relating to the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit("Unit"); and WHEREAS, the Board subsequently amended Ordinance No. 2002-27 by adopting Ordinance No. 2006-05, Ordinance No. 2009-05, and Ordinance 2013-19; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to further amend Ordinance No. 2002-27, as amended, in order to clarify that beach renourishment is one of the purposes of the Unit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION FOUR OF ORDINANCE NO. 2002-27, AS AMENDED. Section Four is hereby amended as follows: SECTION FOUR: Purpose;powers. The Unit is formed for the purpose of providing street lighting, water management, beach renourishment, ambient noise management, extraordinary law enforcement service and beautification, including but not limited to beautification of recreation facilities, sidewalk, street and median areas, identification markers, the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas including the restoration of the mangrove forest preserve and to finance the landscaping beautification of only that portion of U.S. 41 from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road in the above-described taxing and benefit unit and to that end shall possess all the powers to do all things reasonably necessary to provide such services. The Unit will be solely responsible for advising the County on dredging and maintaining Clam Pass for the purpose of enhancing the health of the affected mangrove forest,and will manage such activities for the County. Words Underlined are added;Words Struck SUileier.Thfough are deleted. Page I of 2 SECTION TWO: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this Z21-0.ay ,2013. • ATTEST: BOAR) OF OUNT COMMISSIONERS DWIG}jT E,-BR€CK', Clerk COLLA RC• TY, FLORIDA B 11 By: t �' By: Attest as to.Chairtnannse , Cle GE LER, ESQ. CHA 'W• AN sig ature• .,y App 0;,0..fe srl'and legality: Jeffrey!A..1`atzkow County A orney This ordinance filed with the Secretory of State' Office the e2-1 day of E1 G ", �Ot2 and acknowledcemen�t that filing re eived this '7V'-'day of , oxQ f BY cycp.rytle* Words Underlined are added;Words Struckrough are deleted. Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 2 July 7, 2014 Gary McAlpin, Director Coastal Zone Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Gary: At a recent meeting, you told me county funds could not be used for renourishing portions of the Pelican Bay beach beyond a half-mile public entry point— in this case the western terminus of Vanderbilt Beach Road. You said the section from marker 31.5 to 41.5, or from just south of The Remington to Clam Pass, would be the responsibility of Pelican Bay. Please be advised the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) will assume responsibility for sand renourishment of that portion of the Pelican Bay beach. Based on county surveys, the PBSD will, on an annual basis, designate which sections within those boundaries should receive sand and will fund the designated renourishment. To that end, the PBSD Board of Directors passed the following resolution: The Pelican Bay Services Division acknowledges its authority, as directed by ordinance, to determine annually an acceptable level and disposition of sand renourishment for the Pelican Bay beach for which it is responsible, this renourishment to be consistent with county design standards and available PBSD funds. Please let the PBSD know when the county is planning its annual renourishment activities. We will coordinate with you any sand placement that may be warranted on the sections of the Pelican Bay beach for we have responsibility. Pelican Bay Services Division Board of Directors Dave Trecker, Chairman cc: PBSD Board of Directors Neil Dorrill, Administrator Collier County Board of Commissioners Leo Ochs, County Manager Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation President ATTACHMENT 3 BACKGROUNDER ON BEACH RENOURISHMENT Over the past month, I spoke with Gary McAlpin, head of Coastal Zone Management; Nick Casalanguida, head of the county's Growth Management Division (in the form of Q&A at a presentation he made); and Commissioner Georgia Hiller. From these discussions and previous information on beach renourishment, the following story emerged— some of it new, some not. • State statute defines public beach in terms of beach access to the public. All beach is public below mean high water. Above mean high water, it is public only if it is within one-half mile of a public access point. For Pelican Bay, that means our beach is private from one-half mile south of Vanderbilt Beach Road to Clam Pass—that is, in terms of markers, from between R-31/R-32 to just south of R-41. • The PBSD has renourishment responsibility for that stretch of beach. Any renourishment in that section of the beach will not be funded by the county. Funding must come from Pelican Bay. • Timing for renourishment of the Pelican Bay beach should coincide with timing of county beach renourishment—this to keep costs in check. • The county is dramatically revising its policy on beach renourishment. It now plans to restore sand on an annual as-needed basis —that is, only where there has been serious erosion, not the entire shoreline; and every year, not every six years. Further, as things now stand, the county will renourish only to a width of 100 feet, the guideline used in the last project. Note that the 100-foot distance is measured from the R marker, which is 10-20 feet behind grass-covered dunes, seaward. • Quarry sand trucked in from the east will again be the first choice for renourishment. Dredged sand is cheaper, but only if the scale is very large. Several millions of dollars in set-up costs are incurred for each major off-shore dredging project. • Alternative means of funding county beach renourishment are being explored— sources other than tourist tax dollars. But that has no bearing on us. Pelican Bay must fund its own beach renourishment. • The county will apply for a new 15-year multi-use permit covering beach maintenance. The permit is expected in "spring of 2015." • Regarding cost, according to 2/24/14 numbers from CZM, the PBSD and Foundation together paid about $800,000 for about 23,000 cubic yards of sand in the recent project. For future planning, we are told to use $38/cu. yd. of sand. On that basis, a worst-case scenario would require sand for the entire length and width of the private beach (11,000 feet long x 100 feet wide x 1.5 feet deep) or about 61,000 cu. yds., costing about $2.3 million. A more like scenario is loss of 10-15 feet for the entire length. To restore to a uniform 100 feet, that would cost somewhere in the $230,000 to $350,000 range. Dave Trecker 5/12/14 Updated 5/19/15 ATTACHMENT 4 TIMING AND PROCEDURE FOR 2015 BEACH RENOURISHMENT Sand renourishment of badly eroded beaches in the Naples area was completed in early December 2014. The project cost $2.7 million and involved truck delivery of 78,000 tons (about 51,000 cubic yards) of Immokalee quarry sand. This was the first of scheduled projects to repair the most badly eroded of county beaches each year—this as opposed to beach renourishment along the entire coast every six years, the previous policy. The PBSD is responsible for renourishing the section of the Pelican Bay beach that starts one-half mile south of Vanderbilt Beach Road and continues to Clam Pass. Gary McAlpin of Coastal Zone Management advised that the next beach survey, which will include the entire Pelican Bay beach, will be carried out in February or March 2015. We will be advised of the survey outcome. The next sand-hauling project for renourishment will take place in November-December 2015. Guidelines for identifying county beaches that qualify for the 50,000 cubic yard renourishment will be spelled out, as will the renourishment target (e.g., to a 100-ft. width). We will also be advised of those guidelines. If we choose to spend money to piggyback on the county project in November-December to add sand to some/all of the beach for which we have responsibility, we will have an opportunity to do so. Our decision point will be sometime in the summer of 2015 (more specifics later). Dave Trecker 12/17/14 ATTACHMENT 5 i ^i ..r Yt r GSl4 •.,"A s .- r F -4 +.� + t+r- 21 _t, + F'+ 'f r \,,.44rIii x`. 1111 en 4.;N:,;•'.- ? .4f.74t;¢ar E' f; , i / EN tib' r � r ��t2r. r.y , ,i`;•dr t �1 fi f �� , 160 V e R-33 i ,++4Z% ..j. :* .. c.. i * W �, - a � ; R-34 a. g y k; IL R-35 .t u�.,�'. a . ' `, �r , k 1 1' ` wt. t, e ..." •', c= ,< .. . . .,;r' ,fir} 't • R-36 •r! R-37 -41, OF ;� "' ,-,. MEXICO R-38 �` gJ•,t�` '4:.;',.:!...?,---,1--- ,� ikt f# S`. fid` R-39 A 40 1" • y6 E h •' t. ii �P � R-40 i •., t R-41 b ill, 41\ o ' t" 4 fir ,. Y %` A 1 PHOTO RATED JANUARY 2014 AND a' ‘11 ' COURT {1F i?Ot11ER COUNTYe l , PROPERTY 4FPRAtSER E &MOORS It�f `�+ E ENGINEER - i«.1.� ',- v t,;;,4 i `;.r OC Mint. .. - ��� {;LI;GIl1EFRIllG DES GU �`�s.[,,, .+ g.'. ,��l at-.1". ATTACHMENT 6 PELICAN BAY BEACH WIDTHS* R-31 131 feet R-32 129 R-33 105 R-34 95 R-35 94 R-36 90 R-37 95 R-38 104 R-39 110 R-40 125 R-41 193 * Reported by Gary McAlpin to Coastal Advisory Committee (5/14/15) based on Humiston & Moore survey. Measured from R marker seaward. N C - CDC m Co ° in oo ° c7 3 f' v o a Gl n 7 . 3 0O W VI 'p rr K f7 n 7- c , M. ( ) 7 c n 0 T y rDM o 2 n '*. -1 -' 7< G 7 p O fl- fD F. 7 m 3 N m N N1 3 v Ln 0 Z Z NJ D- "C 0 ifi O 0 W = O co W Ow ---.1 v' N O_ a + 0 w o 0 1.11 T 0) 7. F). 71 Z Z • 00 H - -0 O o o o J co co ni O , v 7.: Q O_ n = = W O F, T cn O A = CO z o ,- v V) (A C 0Q in N N Z Z NJ N O 0 w w c D CO CO w 70 00 Q o 0 0 v, -< o _ _ CD CD c0 CD O v X E n' r CD D z z _ Ni v X 0 o 0 0 o rn W CO N VI W v Q 0 N o m D O 0 - Z 7 C 03 Li) D CU v PV Z Z A w 0 r. roQ O 0 . O -I Ln co _W N OO "'� m O- _ O o O O 6 O O ^, Q O - :. n (,-, O -0 r a i* 5' v Z 2 co A n O o fl' co Q co co An N p, O O O 70 fD N O v CO , a N N Z Z .P. NOl 0 W CO 0 rn � O CL 0 O tilD r- 1•,)N O Co 0 o `^ c aw o N - s , v n Q O _ rD r* 7 O v n n r+ W O o -% O O K O O c 3 r -t SDv - � .n r n C O -I, (D 7 O O Q- rt n 7 = SD 'O O1 3/} S 5— v c � . t .< vi Z Z A 0 O 0 jv — Co W 0 v 0 N Q on a r_+ O O O O to 7 n co v 5- 1- A G) Z Z O O O cn us.) co W NO p Q Cr O_ Q m o O x O O v 7 W olo v N ro C 0g Z Z m - ° 0O 0 v - cn CO CO N 0 Q a 0 O m D o co 70 n ,=1- CD rCD as 1 0 su T F,• A— m 3 IT Z N rn Z 3 0 O O v = co cc o NO t D e a fl 0 O vo 77 NCU c ert r-r 3- CU 0 if Q Z Z - m r O 0 N -v W CO A o CD Q QW O O v o co c N -o -, r- Z Z ry N A O O NJ Q1 fto v,v W A N ol O In O CD 2 NJ 0 -O N ih 'V1. V1 VJ Z Z N 0 O O w CO 0 CO WNJ —1 a 00 CO D w 0 r N 0 Webmail 5/28/15, 10:38 AM Webmail naplessusan@rcn.com PO COPY From : McCaughtryMary <MaryMcCaughtry@colliergov.net> Thu, May 28, 2015 08:52 AM Subject : PO COPY 1 attachment To : naplessusan@rcn.com Cc : Neil Dorrill <neil@dmgfl.com> Susan—as requested attached is a copy of the current PO for the Clam Bay exotic removal/tree trimming in Clam Bay—to date we have spent a little over $23,700—thanks! Mary Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 11480a78_50551.pdf 50 KB http://mail.rcn.com/zimbra/h/printmessage?id=6323 Page 1 of 1 Send all Invoices to: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Ovr rF Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department Ld" P Attn:Accounts Payable = Phone:239-252-8407 b.>={ • 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Fax: 239-732-0844 Naples FL 34112-5749 Tax Exempt:85-8015966531C-1 OuKC OR email to:bccapclerk@collierclerk.com Purchase Order number must appear on all related correspondence,shipping papers and invoices: Vendor# 100234 Purchase order AQUAGENIX PO Number 4500154054 Date 10/08/2014 DEANGELO BROTHERS INC 6260 METRO PLANTATION RD Contact Person Pelican Bay Div FT MYERS FL 33966 Telephone 239-597-1749 Fax 239-597-1749 Please deliver to: PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Delivery Date: 10/08/2015 801 LAUREL OAK DR, STE 302 NAPLES FL 34108 Terms of Payment Net 30 Days Item Material Description Order Qty Unit Price Per Unit Net Value 00010 EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL 37,440 EA 1.00 37,440.00 in Clam Bay "' Item partially delivered "' Total net value excl.tax USD 37,440.00 VENDOR Terms and Conditions The VENDOR agrees to comply with all Purchase Order Terms and Conditions as outlined on the Collier County Purchasing Internet site: http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=762(revision date 01/22/2008),including delivery and payment terms.Further the VENDOR agrees to: 1. Provide goods and services outlined in this Purchase Order with the prices,terms,delivery method and specifications listed above. 2. Notify department Immediately if order fulfillment cannot occur as specified. 3. Send all invoices to: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Attn:Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Naples FL 34112-5749 OR email to:bccapclerk@collierclerk.com The Purchase Order is authorized under direction of Collier County Board of County Commissioners by: Joanne Markiewicz,General Services/Purchasing Director Printed 05/28/2015 @ 08:50:54 320-183800-646319-51100.1 Page 1 of 1 Proposed FY16 budget notes submitted by Susan O'Brien TAX Millage rate of.0857 for street lighting would remain the same,but would generate more revenue because property values have increased. NONADVALOREM ASSESSMENT Increase in special assessment: Water management +$9.90 Community beautification +61.81 Clam Bay + 1.96 Capital projects + 8.44 + 82.11 ($426.76 in FY15 to $508.86)1 Proposed new costs in water management: New Ford Explorer for Operations Manager $39,000 New project manager (1/3 of cost) 2 26,000 New equipment 15,000 Exotics removal and chemicals 60,000 $140,000 Proposed new costs in community beautification 3 new County landscape workers3 $149,800 1 new temporary worker4 44,200 Mandated $2 per hour increase in temp. labor 70,000 1 replacement vehicle for 2006 vehicles 30,657 1 replacement vehicle for 2009 vehicle 36,000 1 new vehicle for new employees 50,000 New equipment 57,700 New project manager (1/3 of cost)6 26,000 $464,357 Proposed new costs in Clam Bay to be at same level of funding as in FY13 and FY14 $15,000 Proposed new costs in capital Automated irrigation equipment-phase 1 of 37 $96,000 1 Numbers are rounded so number is $508.86,not$508.87. 2 Information on Project Manager position is attached. 3 County landscaper employees work 40 hours per week at regular pay and 8 hours per week at overtime pay. 4 Temporary workers used by PBSD work 40 hours per week at regular pay and 8 hours per week at overtime pay. s Information on vehicles to be replaced is attached. 6 Final third of project manager cost is charged to street lighting. Vendor proposal is attached. Projects and Tasks for PBSD Project Manager General Projects records management • Organize original Pelican Bay Improvement District infrastructure (electrical, street lights, water management structures and irrigation, etc.) design and as-built construction plans and other archival documents and develop searchable projects database • Coordinate with engineer to have oversized plans scanned and converted to electronic format Community Outreach • Communicate with Pelican Bay residents and community PBSD projects and services • Prepare press releases and informational material for distribution Water Management Mapping of PBSD drainage easements • Manage development of interactive PBSD inventory map of areas of responsibility and drainage easements with engineers • Coordinate title searches and surveys of all MSTBU property to identify changes or vacations of existing easements and to determine unknowns • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress Lake bank erosion restoration Current project: Oak Lake Sanctuary lake bank erosion restoration with riprap • Perform annual inventory and inspection of lake bank conditions for PBSD-maintained lakes; respond to residents/associations complaints • Research,prepare, and coordinate with engineer to prioritize and obtain lake bank erosion remediation strategies, design specifications, permitting requirements, and estimated costs • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Coordinate bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing and obtain bids/proposals from contractors; • Explore cost-sharing options with community association or property owner/management firm as appropriate • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, monitor ongoing maintenance activities Projects and Tasks for PBSD Project Manager Drainage easements exotic control • Perform annual(or following severe weather event) inventory and inspection of drainage easements for exotics or overgrowth for indications of blockages • Respond to community requests and complaints to control exotics in drainage easements and coordinate appropriate remediation and permitting with engineers • Research,prepare and coordinate project specifications with engineers/consultants and bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing • Explore cost-sharing options with community association or property owner/management firm as appropriate • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Coordinate bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing and obtain bids/proposals from contractors • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, monitor ongoing maintenance activities Water quality remediation and algae control in lakes • Respond to community complaints regarding algae and other aesthetic lake conditions • Coordinate appropriate remediation methods including aeration and power source (electric or solar panels), littoral plantings, floating islands or mats • Research,prepare and coordinate project specifications with engineers/consultants and bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing • Explore cost-sharing options with community association or property owner/management firm as appropriate • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Coordinate bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing and obtain bids/proposals from contractors • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress,monitor ongoing maintenance activities Extended water quality monitoring & sampling in lakes and berm sites Current project:Preparation in coordinating and communicating changes to existing consultant services to include lab testing parameters, locations, collection sites, collection and sampling services, data analysis services, and data interpretation reporting; obtaining bid/quotes/proposals within purchasing process • Coordinate work activities to include communication with staff, consultants, and County and Benchmark labs to prepare and schedule collection sampling,bottles,testing criteria, chain of custody • Obtain and distribute lab data to consultants to prepare reports/analyses • Research,prepare and coordinate project specifications with engineers/consultants and bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing Page 2 of 5 Projects and Tasks for PBSD Project Manager • Explore cost-sharing options with community association or property owner/management firm as appropriate • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Coordinate bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing and obtain bids/proposals from contractors • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, monitor ongoing maintenance activities Community Beautification Current project: Pre stabilization of Oakmont pathways restoration • Coordinate with Foundation the restoration of the Oakmont pathways • Prepare and coordinate PBSD's pre-stabilization project specifications with engineers and bidding/requests for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing • Research, prepare and coordinate project specifications with engineers/consultants and bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing • Explore cost-sharing options with community association or property owner/management firm as appropriate • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Coordinate bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing and obtain bids/proposals from contractors • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, monitor ongoing maintenance activities Community Signage Current project: Comprehensive community signage and decorative posts inventory, inspection, refurbishment, and replacement, and developing future maintenance/replacement schedules • Perform annual inventory and inspection for conditions of community signage and decorative posts • Respond to resident complaints and requests for additional signage, coordinate with County Transportation department to perform warrants analysis studies • Coordinate with county Transportation Operations and Signage departments, engineers, contractors, and community associations the activities associated with street name and traffic signage and decorative posts refurbishment • Prepare and coordinate project specifications with engineers and bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing • Obtain bids/proposals from contractors and explore cost-sharing options with community association or property owner as appropriate • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, monitor ongoing maintenance activities Page 3 of 5 Projects and Tasks for PBSD Project Manager Clam Bay • Coordinate with consultants Clam Bay permitting, purchasing, construction processes, water quality monitoring, tidal gauges monitoring, retrieval and deployment, and data Management Plan activities and Clam Pass dredging projects; • Coordinate work activities to include communication with staff, consultants, and County and Benchmark labs to prepare and schedule collection sampling, bottles,testing criteria, chain of custody • Research,prepare and coordinate project specifications with engineers/consultants and bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing • Explore cost-sharing options with community association or property owner/management firm as appropriate • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Coordinate bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing and obtain bids/proposals from contractors • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, monitor ongoing maintenance activities Beach Renourishment • Coordinate with appropriate county departments, engineers, and community associations, the annual beach renourishment surveys, construction,permitting and purchasing processes to include potential cost sharing arrangements with Foundation and Bay Colony Community Association • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Coordinate bidding/request for quotes/proposals and project specifications with county Purchasing and Coastal Zone Management departments • Obtain bids/proposals from contractors • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, and monitor ongoing maintenance activities Street Lighting CIP Street lighting improvements • Coordinate with engineer a street lighting design and development plan for initial project estimates by phase to include an analysis of lighting diameters, conversion of ballasts and metal halide fixtures to LED, decorative bracket extension arms, and concrete versus decorative replacement poles • Provide recommendations to Board for purposes of budget planning • Research,prepare and coordinate project specifications with engineers/consultants and bidding/request for quotes/proposals with county Purchasing • Obtain bids/proposals from contractors • Coordinate with engineers, contractors, and community associations to schedule, oversee, and monitor work progress, and monitor ongoing maintenance activities Page 4 of 5 Projects and Tasks for PBSD Project Manager Community Roadways Pending project: The Transportation department has informed us (albeit informally)of their intentions to investigate who is responsible for increasing problems with"sinkholes" in Pelican Bay.Allegedly,the causes are collapsing"6-inch"pipes underground attached to roadway catch basins. If it is determined these problems are related to PBID infrastructure construction,what impact will this have on us? • Coordinate with county Transportation Road&Bridge Maintenance department investigations and repairs of roadway problems to include sinkholes, resurfacing projects, utilities and related • Communicate and coordinate with county Transportation R&B, code enforcement,public utilities departments, contractors, Foundation, and residents all roadway work that impacts the Pelican Bay community to include staging areas, scheduling and monitoring work progress Page 5 of 5 Vehicle Lifecycle Costs as 5/1/2015 2009 FORD F250 2WD (CC2-442) Mileage: 36,394 FUEL LABOR MAINTENANCE MISC. PARTS SUBLET REPAIR $12,665.00 $1,028.85 $618.82 $75.00 $1,073.57 $751.87 $2,310.49 History of Repairs & Maintenance DATE IN DATE OUT COST Description of Work Performed 01/09/2015 01/09/2015 $39.19 Oil changed (PM) 07/09/2014 07/24/2014 $32.40 Tire repaired 07/09/2014 07/09/2014 $35.09 Oil changed (PM) 11/06/2013 11/12/2013 $385.14 Right front wheel ABS sensor replaced ABS & traction lights stuck on, sensors 10/24/2013 11/01/2013 $1,539.65 inspected; 4 tires replaced; rear pinion seal leak, seal replaced; wiper blades replaced; oil changed, filters replaced, fluids topped off 03/13/2013 03/13/2013 $20.61 Passenger mirror light assembly repaired 02/22/2013 02/22/2013 $51.59 Oil changed (PM) 09/17/2012 09/17/2012 $155.36 Inspected and replaced battery 0612//2012 06/21/2012 $51.59 Oil changed (PM) 10/11/2011 10/12/2011 $109.49 Replaced passenger side mirror Now 08/16/2011 08/26/2011 $167.07 on; oil changed, filters replaced uvi ers replaced, fluids topped off 03/17/2011 05/10/2011 $0.66 Inspect body damage 09/20/2010 09/20/2010 $46.75 ' 12/07/2009 12/07/2009 $46.75 Oil changed (PM) 01/12/2009 01/16/2009 $600.00 Ca. coa log xapplied 12/29/2008 12/29/2008 $75.00 Vehicle registration 12/4/2008 12/4/2008 $22,205 Vehicle purchased Vehicle Lifecycle Costs as of 4/17/2015 2006 Ford Ranger 4WD (060079) Mileage: 63,572 FUEL LABOR MAINTENANCE MISC. PARTS SUBLET REPAIRS $14,423.18 $3,800.56 $1,224.17 + o $258.89 $6,067.96 History of Repairs & Maintenance DATE IN DATE OUT COST Description of Work Performed 04/17/2015 5/2/2015 $602.34 Full vehicle inspection and PM 11/18/2014 11/25/2014 $269.08 Repaired heater blend door actuator 10/06/2014 10/24/2014 $30.81 Oil changed unfirmimmirmswir 06/19/2014 06/25/2014 $369.90 Thermostat housing/coolant leak repaired �dr;" • �. • . m .. = •�: ,d; right front tire 02/18/2014 02/28/2014 $900.15 replaced; right side torsion bar leveled to correct pulling to right side 06/03/2013 06/07/2013 $177.70 Towed and battery replaced 03/05/2013 03/18/2013 $758.40 2 rear tires replaced; blend door actuator replaced; front sway bar links replaced;front brake pads replaced 02/25/2013 02/26/2013 $40.79 Oil changed (PM) 08/16/2012 08/16/2012 $9.95 Installed part that was on-order(wheel lug nut) Front lower& upper ball joint replaced; mounted & balanced two 06/08/2012 06/11/2012 $1,747.88 front tires,water pump replaced with metal gasket; front-end alignment; oil and air filter replaced; coolant replaced 02/14/2012 02/17/2012 $417.14 Harmonic balancer replaced 10/04/2011 10/04/2011 $40.79 Oil changed (PM) 04/11/2011 04/11/2011 $38.35 Oil changed (PM) 111111111111111111111.11111111, Coil ignition replaced; spark plugs &wires replaced; o-ring 10/07/2010 10/07/2010 $448.99 mounting idle air control valve replaced; fuel injection cleaner& throttle plate replaced 09/22/2010 09/28/2010 $519.82 ga ` rep ace`; rtes replaced and 4 tires balanced; oil and au'fides chano e;wiper blades replaced 01/25/2010 01/28/2010 $190.85 Brakes inspected Fog light re `"d; brakes inspected,front rotors resurfaced & 12/14/2009 12/23/2009 $615.94 front pads replaced; tires balanced; transmission fluid levels inspected Front brakes—rotors resurfaced, pads replaced; rear brakes— drums resurfaced,shoes& cylinders replaced; 4 tires replaced; 03/11/2009 03/25/2009 $1,409.11 front end alignment—caster/camber adjusters installed; engine oil pan replaced and sealed; transmission leak repaired; battery replaced 02/15/2007 02/15/2007 $31.20 Oil changed (PM) 05/11/2006 05/11/2006 $75.00 Vehicle registration 05/8/2006 05/8/2006 $18,770.50 Vehicle purchased Vehicle Lifecycle Costs as of 5/22/2015 2008 Ford Explorer(CC2-288) Mileage: 91,855 FUEL LABOR MAINTENANCE MISC. PARTS SUBLET REPAIRS $16,495.44 $4,903.39 s"-,7-;.-. y 0 $9,28049 +�. x6�$ $ gam. History of Repairs & Maintenance DATE IN DATE OUT COST Description of Work Performed Tire pressure sensor fault, repeat issue; reset sensors; left 02/03/2015 03/07/2015 $632.46 rear tail light replaced; Oil changed,fuel and air filters replaced. Tires rotated and balanced; battery replaced 10/20/2014 10/29/2014 $428.94 Tire sensor fault message; Checked and replaced 4 tires 10/10/2014 10/10/2014 $35.00 Oil change(preventive maintenance) 09/25/2014 09/25/2014 $131.99 Detail car wash 05/29/2014 06/05/2014 $1,087.30 Check eng rielight tire sensor stuck on— replaced EGR valve and 4 tire sensors 05/01/2014 05/16/2014 $365.36 A/C blower motor& blower resistor; and front sway links replaced Water pump and coolant leaks,transmission slipping. 10/04/2013 10/24/2013 $4,590.29 Transmission assembly,water pump,thermostat housings, ;, 46 harmonic balancer, spark plugs&wires replaced 07/24/2013 07/29/2013 $0.00 Inspect damage to front bumper 05/03/2013 05/13/2013 $649.26 Maintenance& repairs to brakes, replaced oil &air filter, wipers, 2 rear ti,re replaced 10/31/2012 11/05/2012 $493.60 Thermostat housings replaced; coolant housing and coolant replaced; oil and air filter changed 09/13/2012 09/19/2012 $136.98 Battery replaced Front and rear brake rotors and pads replaced; radiator 05/16/2012 07/03/2012 $2,430.78 replaced; thermostat replaced; 2 front tires replaced and balanced 10/18/2011 11/30/2011 $40.79 PM Oil chanallill 03/31/2011 04/01/2011 $463.31 Tire sensor light stuck on; 2 front tires replaced and balanced _u 04/26/2010 04/26/2010 $38.35 PM Oil changed 10/05/2009 10/07/2009 $919.15 4 tires replaced, maintenance to brakes,oil change 05/04/2009 05/04/2009 $38.35 PM Oil changed 09/29/2008 10/03/2008 $206.17 Wiper blades replaced,oil & air filters changed 09/26/2008 11/26/2008 $0.00 Inspected minor body damage to left rear wheel well trim 06/27/2008 07/01/2008 $38.03 PM Oil changed 12/11/2007 12/11/2007 $75.00 Title& registration 12/7/2007 12/7/2007 $22,034 Vehicle purchased CONTEMPORARY CONTROLS& Ir.� � COMMUNICATIONS,INC. lT rl� G� 0 z 'd_ 505 West Hickpochee Ave. 1 1 Suite 200, Box 107 Date Estimate No. LaBelle, Fl 33935 2/9/2015 7607 J Name/Address COLLIER COUNTY BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSION 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E.S T E 700 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 A I I ENTION:A/P Dept PO# r Description Qty UM Rate Total _ Phase#/1 Central IFI, NODE,Weather station &Controllers on Pelican Bay to Gulf Park Dr., Crayton rd.,Myra Daniels Blvd.&Ridge wood. IRRlnet ACE, RU/IFI, UHF Radio, Powersupply, 1 4,762.50 4,762.50 Battery, 110V surge,Wall Mount Enclosure. (NOTE;We will use your existing UHF FCC license,antenna and coax along with a Windows?PC provided by your IT department). ACEO.PS.Battery.Chassis.CDM750 UHF Radio 1 3,582.81 3,582.81 (NODE using existing antenna) ICC-PRO software(up to 5000 I/Os) 1 4,870.50 4,870.50 Central System Installation, Integration of 1 7,800.00 7,800.00 Controllers, Supervision of RTUs (Field Units) Vantage Pro2 plus Data Cable and Key 1 487.50 487.50 Davis Weather2 with Digital Display 1 1,800.00 1,800.00 IRRlnet ACE 3600, Power supply, CDM750 UI-IF 4 3,771.00 15,084.00 Radio, Battery,Chassis. Decoder Programer 1 240.00 240.00 ACE 16D0 MODULE 2 526.50 1,053.00 ACE 16 DI 4 400.50 1,602.00 ACE 2 WIRE MODULE 9 1,725.00 15,525.00 Decoder_1 Station 336 76.50 25,704.00 Helping to manage our water resources. L Total J Phone Fax# E-mail I = Web Site 863-675-2372 863-675-7140 I holman863@embargmail.com http://controls.ernbargspace.com Page 1 CONTEIv POPAR Y CONTROLS& - COMMUNICATIONS,INC. r os w - 505 West Hickpochee Ave. �-- Suite 200, Box 107 Date Estimate No. LaBelle, Fl 33935 -- — 2/9/2015 7607 Name/Address COLLIER COUNTY BOARD Of COUNT( COMMISSION 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E. S T E 700 NAPLES,FLORIDA 34112 ATTENTION:A/P Dept PO# Description Qty t91{l�l I Rate Total Pedestal ACE 16 DI,1-2 Wire,110V, assembly, 1 3,250.50 3,250.50 antenna 8,cables. Stainless steel Pedestal Pedestal ACE 16 Dl 16 DO, 3 2 Wire 1 3,430.50 3430.50 modules,110V,assembly, antenna 8t cables. Stainless steel Pedestal Pedestal ACE 16 DI , 2-2 Wire modules,11 OV, 1 3,250.50 3,250.50 assembly,antenna&cables. Stainless steel Pedestal Pedestal ACE 16 DI ,3-2 Wire modules,110V, 1 3,165.00 3,165.00 assembly, antenna&cables. Stainless steel Pedestal EEPROM PROGRAMING/FLASHING 4 75.00 300.00 FREIGHT 1 1,012.50 1,012.50 Helping to manage our water resources. Total $96,920.31 J Phone Fax E-mail Web Site 863-675-2372 863-675-7140 holman863@ernbarqmail.com http://controls.embargspace.com Page 2 CONTEMPORARY CONTROLS& COMMUNICATIONS,INC. lr ro p Cis a 505 West Hickpochee Ave. Suite 200, Box 107 Date Estimate No. LaBelle, Fl 33935 2/9/2015 7608 Name/Address COLLIER COUNTY BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSION 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E. STE 700 NAPLES,FLORIDA 34112 ATTENTION:A/P Dept PO# Description Qty U/M Rate Total Phase 42; Pelican Bay Blvd North, Bay Colony, North Pointe, Hammock Oak Dr.Controllers IRRInet ACE 3600, Power supply, CDM750 UHF 8 3,771.00 30,168.00 Radio, Battery,Chassis. ACE 1600 MODULE 9 526.50 4,738.50 ACE 16 DI 8 400.50 3,204.00 ACE 2 WIRE MODULE 6 1,725.00 10,350.00 Decoder_1 Station 240 76.50 18,360.00 Pedestal ACE 16 DI, 1-2 Wire,110V, assembly, 4 3,250.50 13,002.00 antenna&cables. Stainless steel Pedestal Pedestal ACE 16 DI, up to 48 Stations, I/O 3 3,400.50 10,201.50 Surge,110V,assembly, antenna&cables. Stainless steel Pedestal Pedestal ACE 16 DI 16 DO, 3 2 Wire 1 3,430.50 3,430.50 modules,110V,assembly, antenna&cables. Stainless steel Pedestal Pedestal ACE 16 DI ,2-2 Wire modules,110V, 1 3,250.50 3,250.50 assembly, antenna&cables. Stainless steel Pedestal EEPROM PROGRAMING/FLASHING 8 75.00 600.00 FREIGHT 1 675.00 675.00 Helping to manage our water resources. Total $97,980.00 i Phone Fax# ! E-mail Web Site 863-675-2372 863-675-7140 holman863@embarqmail.com embargmail.com http://controls,embargspace,com CONTEMPORARY CONTROLS& COMMUNICATIONS,INC, �r r 505 West Hickpochee Ave. r� ��0E' • Suite 200, Box 107 Date Estimate No. LaBelle, Fl 33935 2/9/2015 7609 Name/Address COLLIER COUNTY BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSION 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL E.STE 700 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ATTENTION:A/P Dept PO# Description Qty UrM Rate Total Phase 3; Gulf Park Dr.,Green Tree, Oakmont Parkway& all Cal-de-Sac,Commons&Building site office IRRInet ACE 3600, Power supply, CDM750 UHF 9 3,771.00 33,939.00 Radio, Battery,Chassis. ACE 16DO MODULE 27 526.50 14,215.50 ACE 16 DI 9 400.50 3,604.50 MOTOROLA IRRInet MAC 24 Station with 7 4,741.79286 33,192.55 Radio,Transformer, Charger 110VAC/12VDC, Battery, Surge protection board with switches, 110VAC Surge, UHF radio, UI-IF Omni Antenna, Stainless steel pedestal. Pedestal ACE 16 DI, up to 48 Stations, I/O 9 3,400.50 30,604.50 Surge,110V, assembly, antenna B:cables. Stainless steel Pedestal EEPROM PROGRAMING/FLASHING 16 75.00 1,200.00 PIU-XR Controller UHF Radio 450-470MHz 6 768.00 4,608.00 PICCOLO XR 4/4 RADIO RTU,6V 4.5AH 40 930.00 37,200.00 RECHARGEABLE BATTERY, SOLAR PANEL, ENCLOSURE EEPROM PROGRAMING/FLASHING 28 75.00 2,100.00 FREIGHT 1 675.00 675.00 t Helping to manage our water resources. Total $161,339.05 Phone# Fax# I E-mail Web Site 563-675-2372 I 863-675-7140 holmaii863@cmbargmail.com http://controls.embargspace.com Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Department Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Personal Services 1,149,171 1,189,500 1,213,600 1,215,300 222,300 1,437,600 20.9% Operating Expense 1,309,417 1,465,500 1,787,000 1,921,100 - 1,921,100 31.1% Indirect Cost Reimburs 85,900 82,600 82,600 69,700 - 69,700 (15.6%) Capital Outlay 14,869 84,400 73,600 228,400 - 228,400 170.6% Net Operating Budget 2,559,357 2,822,000 3,156,800 3,434,500 222,300 3,656,800 29.6% Trans to Property Appraiser 44,375 62,700 62,700 63,900 - 63,900 1.9% Trans to Tax Collector 60,408 97,900 97,900 100,000 - 100,000 2.1% Trans to 322 Pel Bay kr and Land 210,000 77,300 77,300 - - - (100.0%) Trans to 408 Water/Sewer Fd 15,900 15,900 15,900 14,200 - 14,200 (10.7%) Reserves for Contingencies - 129,600 - 53,800 - 53,800 (58.5%) Reserves for Capital - 1,488,500 - 1,126,100 - 1,126,100 (24.3%) Reserves for Cash Flow - - - 250,000 - 250,000 na Reserves for Attrition - (21,500) - (21,500) - (21,500) 0.0% Total Budget 2,890,040 4,672,400 3,410,600 5,021,000 222,300 5,243,300 12.2% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Appropriations by Program Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Pelican Bay-Clam Pass Ecosystem - - 89,000 150,000 - 150,000 na Enhancement(111) Pelican Bay Community Beautification 1,670,705 1,813,400 1,960,900 2,157,500 169,700 2,327,200 28.3% (109) Pelican Bay Street Lighting(778) 260,509 265,400 296,100 315,100 26,700 341,800 28.8% Pelican Bay Water Management(109) 628,143 743,200 810,800 811,900 25,900 837,800 12.7% Total Net Budget 2,559,357 2,822,000 3,156,800 3,434,500 222,300 3,656,800 29.6% Total Transfers and Reserves 330,683 1,850,400 253,800 1,586,500 - 1,586,500 (14.3%) Total Budget 2,890,040 4,672,400 3,410,600 5,021,000 222,300 5,243,300 12.2% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Department Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Ad Valorem Taxes 428,946 462,800 444,300 497,300 - 497,300 7.5% Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes 44 - - - - - na Special Assessments 2,589,754 2,794,400 2,630,000 3,340,400 - 3,340,400 19.5% Miscellaneous Revenues 1,506 - 3,300 - - - na Interest/Misc 11,903 6,500 5,300 6,500 - 6,500 0.0% Trans frm Property Appraiser 577 - - - - - na Trans frm Tax Collector 22,389 - - - - - na Net Cost MSTU General Fund - - 89,000 150,000 - 150,000 na Carry Forward 1,520,500 1,571,900 1,680,000 1,219,000 222,300 1,441,300 (8.3%) Less 5%Required By Law - (163,200) - (192,200) - (192,200) 17.8% Total Funding 4,575,620 4,672,400 4,851,900 5,021,000 222,300 5,243,300 12.2% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Department Position Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Pelican Bay Water Management(109) 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 0.33 2.52 15.1% Pelican Bay Community Beautification 12.42 12.42 12.42 12.42 3.33 15.75 26.8% (109) Pelican Bay Street Lighting(778) 1.39 1.39 1.39 1.39 0.34 1.73 24.5% Total FTE 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 4.00 20.00 25.0% Fiscal Year 2016 1 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Pelican Bay Water Management (109) Mission Statement To provide for the efficient and timely delivery of Water Management services to the Pelican Bay Community by providing for the necessary maintenance for the community's storm water system to assure its efficient operation in the transporting and treatment of the storm water. In addition,the Department tries to maintain the highest aesthetic appearance while maintaining the delicate balance of the ecosystem. FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Summary Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Water Management Program 2.19 811,900 880,900 -69,000 Includes the routine maintenance of the Pelican Bay Water Management System of approximately 3.5 miles of berm separating the developed property from the Clam Pass System. The system functions as a storm water treatment facility by removing nutrients and pollutants,thus improving the quality of storm water before it is discharged into Clam Bay. Current Level of Service Budget 2.19 811,900 880,900 -69,000 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Enhancements Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Project Manager 0.33 25,900 - 25,900 Expanded Field and Adminstrative Services Expanded Services Budget 0.33 25,900 - 25,900 Total Requested Budget 2.52 837,800 880,900 -43,100 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 Program Performance Measures Actual Budget Forecast Budget Aquatic plants planted - 10,000 - - Forty-three lakes maintained/treated-times per year - 52 - - Water quality testing-number of parameters - 4,689 - - FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Personal Services 188,724 190,300 189,600 190,000 25,900 215,900 13.5% Operating Expense 345,944 452,500 520,800 501,400 - 501,400 10.8% Indirect Cost Reimburs 80,300 76,800 76,800 66,500 - 66,500 (13.4%) Capital Outlay 13,174 23,600 23,600 54,000 - 54,000 128.8% Net Operating Budget 628,143 743,200 810,800 811,900 25,900 837,800 12.7% Total Budget 628,143 743,200 810,800 811,900 25,900 837,800 12.7% Total FTE 2.19 2.19 2.19 2.19 0.33 2.52 15.1% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Special Assessments 714,672 805,500 757,900 880,900 - 880,900 9.4% Miscellaneous Revenues - - 3,300 - - - na Total Funding 714,672 805,500 761,200 880,900 - 880,900 9.4% Forecast FY 2015: Water quality management expenses are generally in line with the budget. Fiscal Year 2016 2 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Pelican Bay Water Management(109) Current FY 2016: Personal Services account for the general wage adjustement. Operating expenses are increasing due to increases in contractual temporary labor,the contractual exotic removal program and engineering services for the water quality program. Revenues: Special assessment revenue funding water management activities and community beautification increased$72.62 to$439.62 per equivalent residential unit(ERU). The District has a total of 7,614.29 ERU's-the same as FY 15. Fiscal Year 2016 3 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Pelican Bay Community Beautification (109) Mission Statement To provide for the efficient and timely delivery of Water Management services to the Pelican Bay Community by providing for the necessary maintenance for the community's storm water system to assure its efficient operation in the transporting and treatment of the storm water. In addition,the Department tries to maintain the highest aesthetic appearance while maintaining the delicate balance of the ecosystem. FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Summary Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Water Management Program - 300 - 300 Includes the routine maintenance of the Pelican Bay Water Management System of approximately 3.5 miles of berm separating the developed property from the Clam Pass System. The system functions as a storm water treatment facility by removing nutrients and pollutants,thus improving the quality of storm water before it is discharged into Clam Bay. Beautification Program 12.42 2,157,200 2,459,500 -302,300 Includes the routine maintenance of 2,873,750 square feet of right-of-way and community parks-including pruning, cutting, pesticide and fertilizer programs.Also annuals are changed two times per year and mulch is applied to 661,750 square feet of plant beds three times per year. The Beautification Department is also responsible for street sweeping, street trash pick-up, and a sign maintenance program that includes traffic and entrance signs. Current Level of Service Budget 12.42 2,157,500 2,459,500 -302,000 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Enhancements Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Maintenace Worker 1.00 42,400 - 42,400 Expanded Field Services Maintenance Specialist 1.00 50,700 - 50,700 Expanded Field Services Maintenance Specialist 1.00 50,700 - 50,700 Expanded Field Services Project Manager 0.33 25,900 - 25,900 Expanded Field and Adminstrative Services Expanded Services Budget 3.33 169,700 - 169,700 Total Requested Budget 15.75 2,327,200 2,459,500 -132,300 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 Program Performance Measures Actual Budget Forecast Budget Boulevards swept-times per year - 52 - - Chemical weed control-times per year - 24 - - Fertilizer applied-times per year - 2 - - Flower plantings-times per year - 2 - - Irrigation systems checked-times per year - 12 - - Mulch application-times per year - 3 - - Streets swept-single family areas - 12 - - Fiscal Year 2016 4 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Pelican Bay Community Beautification (109) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Personal Services 844,519 883,300 909,500 910,200 169,700 1,079,900 22.3% Operating Expense 825,491 884,300 1,006,400 1,072,900 - 1,072,900 21.3% Capital Outlay 695 45,800 45,000 174,400 - 174,400 280.8% Net Operating Budget 1,670,705 1,813,400 1,960,900 2,157,500 169,700 2,327,200 28.3% Total Budget 1,670,705 1,813,400 1,960,900 2,157,500 169,700 2,327,200 28.3% Total FTE 12.42 12.42 12.42 12.42 3.33 15.75 26.8% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Special Assessments 1,875,082 1,988,900 1,872,100 2,459,500 - 2,459,500 23.7% Miscellaneous Revenues 1,506 - - - - - na Total Funding 1,876,588 1,988,900 1,872,100 2,459,500 - 2,459,500 23.7% Forecast FY 2015: Operating expenses exceed budget due to an advanced level of tree triming and temporary labor required to clear all pathway and line of sight obstructions within the district. This action required a BA from reserves and was approved by the Board. Remaining expenses including personal services are in line with the budget. Current FY 2016: Personal service appropriations include a Board approved compensation adjustment and a modest increase in the overtime component for safety and emergency situations. Operating expenses have increased modestly. Revenues: Special assessment revenue funding water management activities and community beautification increased$72.62 to$439.62 per equivalent residential unit(ERU). The District has a total of 7,614.29 ERU's-the same as FY 15. Overall,special assessment revenue budgeted within this fund has increased$72.62 per equivalent residential unit to$439.62.A slight draw on actual fund balance totaling$2,000 occurred between year ending FY 13 and year ending FY 14. Beginning FY 15,the funds cash position totaled$891,300. Fund reserves while reduced in FY 15 by$200,000 remain satisfactory and in compliance with budget policy. Reserves in this fund are established between 15%and 30%of operating expense and the FY 16 reserves are 17.7%of operating expenses. Reserves in this fund have dropped steadily since FY 2008 from$1.2M or 44%of operating expense. Fiscal Year 2016 5 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Reserves &Transfers (109) FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Summary Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Reserve&Transfers - 537,500 166,500 371,000 Current Level of Service Budget - 537,500 166,500 371,000 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Enhancements Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Maintenace Worker - - 42,400 -42,400 Expanded Field Services Maintenance Specialist - - 50,700 -50,700 Expanded Field Services Maintenance Specialist - - 50,700 -50,700 Expanded Field Services Project Manager - - 51,800 -51,800 Expanded Field and Adminstrative Services Expanded Services Budget - - 195,600 -195,600 Total Requested Budget - 537,500 362,100 175,400 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Trans to Property Appraiser 44,375 53,800 53,800 55,000 - 55,000 2.2% Trans to Tax Collector 51,787 83,900 83,900 86,000 - 86,000 2.5% Trans to 322 Pel Bay Irr and Land 210,000 77,300 77,300 - - - (100.0%) Trans to 408 Water/Sewer Fd 15,900 15,900 15,900 14,200 - 14,200 (10.7%) Reserves for Contingencies - 121,800 - 53,800 - 53,800 (55.8%) Reserves for Capital - 537,900 - 200,000 - 200,000 (62.8%) Reserves for Cash Flow - - - 150,000 - 150,000 na Reserves for Attrition - (21,500) - (21,500) - (21,500) 0.0% Total Budget 322,063 869,100 230,900 537,500 - 537,500 (38.2%) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Interest/Misc 7,921 4,000 3,300 4,000 - 4,000 0.0% Trans frm Property Appraiser 577 - - - - - na Trans frm Tax Collector 19,199 - - - - - na Carry Forward 893,300 767,200 891,300 329,700 195,600 525,300 (31.5%) Less 5%Required By Law - (139,900) - (167,200) - (167,200) 19.5% Total Funding 920,998 631,300 894,600 166,500 195,600 362,100 (42.6%) Current FY 2016: Fund reserves while reduced in FY 15 by$200,000 remain satisfactory and in compliance with budget policy. Reserves in this fund are established between 15%and 30%of operating expense and the FY 16 reserves are 17.7%of operating expenses. This is particularly Fiscal Year 2016 6 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Reserves &Transfers (109) important given the District's coastal nature, infrastructure and natural assets and high level of commitment to both maintenance and resource protection. Fiscal Year 2016 7 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Pelican Bay Street Lighting (778) Mission Statement To maintain the Pelican Bay Street Lighting system as a well-balanced functional system that provides a consistently lighted roadway appearance within the community. FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Summary Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Street Lighting Program 1.39 315,100 497,300 -182,200 Includes the routine maintenance of the Pelican Bay roadway street lighting system including all up-lighting at the Pelican Bay entrances and bike path lighting. Street Lights consist of concrete poles and metal Halide lamps. Reserves/Transfers - 1,049,000 866,800 182,200 Current Level of Service Budget 1.39 1,364,100 1,364,100 - FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Enhancements Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Project Manager 0.34 26,700 26,700 - Expanded Field and Adminstrative Services Expanded Services Budget 0.34 26,700 26,700 - Total Requested Budget 1.73 1,390,800 1,390,800 - FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 Program Performance Measures Actual Budget Forecast Budget %of Lights repaired within 24 hours - 100 - - Light posts inspected - 26 - - FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Personal Services 115,927 115,900 114,500 115,100 26,700 141,800 22.3% Operating Expense 137,982 128,700 170,800 196,800 - 196,800 52.9% Indirect Cost Reimburs 5,600 5,800 5,800 3,200 - 3,200 (44.8%) Capital Outlay 1,000 15,000 5,000 - - - (100.0%) Net Operating Budget 260,509 265,400 296,100 315,100 26,700 341,800 28.8% Trans to Property Appraiser - 8,900 8,900 8,900 - 8,900 0.0% Trans to Tax Collector 8,621 14,000 14,000 14,000 - 14,000 0.0% Reserves for Contingencies - 7,800 - - - - (100.0%) Reserves for Capital - 950,600 - 926,100 - 926,100 (2.6%) Reserves for Cash Flow - - - 100,000 - 100,000 na Total Budget 269,129 1,246,700 319,000 1,364,100 26,700 1,390,800 11.6% Total FTE 1.39 1.39 1.39 1.39 0.34 1.73 24.5% Fiscal Year 2016 8 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Pelican Bay Street Lighting (778) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Ad Valorem Taxes 428,946 462,800 444,300 497,300 - 497,300 7.5% Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes 44 - - - - - na Interest/Misc 3,981 2,500 2,000 2,500 - 2,500 0.0% Trans frm Tax Collector 3,190 - - - - - na Carry Forward 627,200 804,700 788,700 889,300 26,700 916,000 13.8% Less 5%Required By Law - (23,300) - (25,000) - (25,000) 7.3% Total Funding 1,063,362 1,246,700 1,235,000 1,364,100 26,700 1,390,800 11.6% Forecast FY 2015: Operating expenses are forecast to exceed budget due to unanticipated electrical contractor needs. This action was covered by budget amendments. Personal services are in line with the adopted budget. Current FY 2016: Personal Services increased modestly to fund the planned employee compensation adjustment. The net operating budget for FY 16 increased from FY 15 with major expenses associated with the maintaining the lighting system. Increased expenses are planned for engineering fees,temporary labor and electrical contractor services. Reserves will be increased for future construction and improvement of the street lighting system as identified in the Pelican Bay Community Improvement Plan. Revenues: This fund had a millage rate of.0857 in FY 15 and the rate remains unchanged for FY 16 in accordance with the advisory committees recommendation. Taxable value for this district totals$5,803,371,000 which represents a 7.50%increase over last year. Property taxes total$497,300. The District's actual fund balance year over year increased$161,500 to$788,700. This is a managed increase which is expected to continue based upon growth in taxable value and the plan to set aside dollars for future system improvements. Fiscal Year 2016 9 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Pelican Bay Services Division Pelican Bay—Clam Pass Ecosystem Enhancement(111) FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Summary Total FTE Budget Revenues Net Cost Clam Pass Ecosystem Enhancement - 150,000 - 150,000 Current Level of Service Budget - 150,000 - 150,000 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Operating Expense - - 89,000 150,000 - 150,000 na Net Operating Budget - - 89,000 150,000 - 150,000 na Total Budget - - 89,000 150,000 - 150,000 na FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Net Cost MSTU General Fund - - 89,000 150,000 - 150,000 na Total Funding - 89,000 150,000 - 150,000 na Forecast FY 2015: Beginning mid-year FY 15, a seperate cost center was created and funds appropriated by budget amendment to assist with management of the Clam Bay Estuary. Current FY 2016: Previously budgeted as a transfer from the Unincorporated Area General Fund(111)to Pelican Bay Capital Fund (320),funds to assist with management of the Clam Bay Estuary are now directly budgeted within a seperate Fund (111)cost center with direct signature authority by Pelican Bay MSTBU management. Fiscal Year 2016 10 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Capital Pelican Bay Services Division Capital FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Department Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Operating Expense 1,522,852 549,000 2,011,200 571,300 - 571,300 4.1% Capital Outlay 48,924 - 140,600 216,000 - 216,000 na Net Operating Budget 1,571,776 549,000 2,151,800 787,300 - 787,300 43.4% Trans to Property Appraiser 5,135 6,700 6,700 6,700 - 6,700 0.0% Trans to Tax Collector 6,638 11,600 11,600 11,600 - 11,600 0.0% Reserves for Contingencies - 11,700 - 17,500 - 17,500 49.6% Total Budget 1,583,549 579,000 2,170,100 823,100 - 823,100 42.2% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Appropriations by Program Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Clam Bay Restoration(320) 217,819 153,900 191,200 120,400 - 120,400 (21.8%) Pelican Bay Hardscape&Landscape 1,353,957 395,100 1,960,600 666,900 - 666,900 68.8% Improvements(322) Total Net Budget 1,571,776 549,000 2,151,800 787,300 - 787,300 43.4% Total Transfers and Reserves 11,773 30,000 18,300 35,800 - 35,800 19.3% Total Budget 1,583,549 579,000 2,170,100 823,100 - 823,100 42.2% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Department Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Special Assessments 331,943 455,000 436,700 534,200 - 534,200 17.4% Miscellaneous Revenues - - 82,700 - - - na Interest/Misc 13,873 11,300 8,600 5,500 - 5,500 (51.3%) Trans frm Tax Collector 2,443 - - - - - na Trans fm 109 Pel Bay MSTBU 210,000 77,300 77,300 - - - (100.0%) Trans fm 111 MSTD Gen Fd 32,300 50,000 50,000 - - - (100.0%) Carry Forward 2,818,200 8,800 1,825,200 310,400 - 310,400 3,427.3% Less 5%Required By Law - (23,400) - (27,000) - (27,000) 15.4% Total Funding 3,408,759 579,000 2,480,500 823,100 - 823,100 42.2% FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 CIP Category/Project Title Adopted Amended Forecasted Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Pelican Bay Capital Beach Renourishment Initiative 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - - - - Clam Bay Restoration 153,900 191,234 191,200 120,400 - - - - Irrigation System - - - 116,000 - - - - Lake Aeration - 129,576 129,600 100,000 - - - - North Berm Restoration - 565,851 565,900 - - - - - Pelican Bay Hardscape Upgrades 85,100 791,271 791,300 90,900 - - - - Pelican Bay Lake Bank Enhance 110,000 215,541 215,500 110,000 - - - - Pelican Bay Traffic Sign Renovation - 58,260 58,300 50,000 - - - - X-fers/Reserves-Fund 320 18,000 18,000 6,300 23,800 - - - - X-fers/Reserves-Fund 322 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 - - - - Pelican Bay Capital 579,000 2,181,733 2,170,100 823,100 - - - - Department Total Project Budget 579,000 2,181,733 2,170,100 823,100 - - - - Fiscal Year 2016 11 Office of the County Manager Capital Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Capital Pelican Bay Services Division Capital Clam Bay Restoration (320) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Operating Expense 217,819 153,900 180,200 120,400 - 120,400 (21.8%) Capital Outlay - - 11,000 - - - na Net Operating Budget 217,819 153,900 191,200 120,400 - 120,400 (21.8%) Trans to Property Appraiser 1,997 2,700 2,700 2,700 - 2,700 0.0% Trans to Tax Collector 2,565 3,600 3,600 3,600 - 3,600 0.0% Reserves for Contingencies - 11,700 - 17,500 - 17,500 49.6% Total Budget 222,381 171,900 197,500 144,200 - 144,200 (16.1%) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Special Assessments 128,284 118,600 113,800 133,500 - 133,500 12.6% Interest/Misc 933 500 500 500 - 500 0.0% Trans frm Tax Collector 950 - - - - na Trans fm 111 MSTD Gen Fd 32,300 50,000 50,000 - - - (100.0%) Carry Forward 110,000 8,800 50,100 16,900 - 16,900 92.0% Less 5%Required By Law - (6,000) - (6,700) - (6,700) 11.7% Total Funding 272,467 171,900 214,400 144,200 - 144,200 (16.1%) FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 CIP Category/Project Title Adopted Amended Forecasted Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Pelican Bay Capital Clam Bay Restoration 153,900 191,234 191,200 120,400 - - - - X-fers/Reserves-Fund 320 18,000 18,000 6,300 23,800 - - - - Pelican Bay Capital 171,900 209,234 197,500 144,200 - - - - Program Total Project Budget 171,900 209,234 197,500 144,200 - - - - Notes: On December 11, 2012,the Board reinstated the ongoing management responsibilities of Clam Pass to the Pelican Bay Services District. Forecast FY 2015: This capital fund primarily appropriates dollars for restoration and improvements to the Clam Bay Ecosystem. The basis of our accounting system on the expense side of the equation provides that forecast capital dollars always match the amended budget for any year. The exception is reserves.The difference between forecast or amended budget dollars and those dollars actually spent roll forward into the next fiscal year.This practice occurs until the project is closed out and dollars are re-appropriated.A project budget may also be amended prior to closure re-directing current project dollars that may not be needed to either reserves or other ongoing projects. The primary active project is restoration of Clam Bay. Current FY 2016: No new projects are proposed. New money in the amount of$120,400 will be added to the Clam Bay restoration project in furtherance of this initiative. Customary constitutional officer transfers are appropriated.A small reserve for future construction is budgeted. Revenues: Funding for part of the restoration and Improvement of the Clam Bay Eco-system comes from special assessment revenue based upon equivalent residential units within the District. Fiscal Year 2016 12 Office of the County Manager Capital Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Capital Pelican Bay Services Division Capital Clam Bay Restoration (320) For FY 16,the equivalent residential unit(ERU)assessment within fund(320)has increased $1.95 to$17.53.This raises an additional $14,900.There are a total of 7,614.29 ERU's. Fiscal Year 2016 13 Office of the County Manager Capital Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2016 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Capital Pelican Bay Services Division Capital Pelican Bay Hardscape & Landscape Improvements (322) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Budgetary Cost Summary Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Operating Expense 1,305,033 395,100 1,831,000 450,900 - 450,900 14.1% Capital Outlay 48,924 - 129,600 216,000 - 216,000 na Net Operating Budget 1,353,957 395,100 1,960,600 666,900 - 666,900 68.8% Trans to Property Appraiser 3,138 4,000 4,000 4,000 - 4,000 0.0% Trans to Tax Collector 4,073 8,000 8,000 8,000 - 8,000 0.0% Total Budget 1,361,168 407,100 1,972,600 678,900 - 678,900 66.8% FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Program Funding Sources Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Requested Change Special Assessments 203,659 336,400 322,900 400,700 - 400,700 19.1% Miscellaneous Revenues - - 82,700 - - - na Interest/Misc 12,940 10,800 8,100 5,000 - 5,000 (53.7%) Trans frm Tax Collector 1,493 - - - - - na Trans fm 109 Pel Bay MSTBU 210,000 77,300 77,300 - - - (100.0%) Carry Forward 2,708,200 - 1,775,100 293,500 - 293,500 na Less 5%Required By Law - (17,400) - (20,300) - (20,300) 16.7% Total Funding 3,136,292 407,100 2,266,100 678,900 - 678,900 66.8% FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 CIP Category/Project Title Adopted Amended Forecasted Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Pelican Bay Capital Beach Renourishment Initiative 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - - - Irrigation System - - 0 116,000 - - - Lake Aeration - 129,576 129,600 100,000 - - - - North Berm Restoration - 565,851 565,900 - - - - - Pelican Bay Flardscape Upgrades 85,100 791,271 791,300 90,900 - - - - Pelican Bay Lake Bank Enhance 110,000 215,541 215,500 110,000 - - - - Pelican Bay Traffic Sign Renovation - 58,260 58,300 50,000 - - - - X-fers/Reserves-Fund 322 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 - - - - Pelican Bay Capital 407,100 1,972,499 1,972,600 678,900 - - - - Program Total Project Budget 407,100 1,972,499 1,972,600 678,900 - - - - Forecast FY 2015: This capital fund primarily appropriates dollars for restoration and improvements to the Pelican Bay hardscape, irrigation and other capital amenity projects.The basis of our accounting system on the expense side of the equation provides that forecast capital dollars always match the amended budget for any year.The exception is reserves. The difference between forecast or amended budget dollars and those dollars actually spent roll forward into the next fiscal year. This practice occurs until the project is closed out and dollars are re-appropriated.A project budget may also be amended prior to closure re-directing current project dollars that may not be needed to either reserves or other ongoing projects. Revenues: Special assessment revenue per equivalent residential unit(ERU) increased$8.45 to$52.63.This equates to assessment revenue totaling$400,700 an increase of$64,300 from FY 2015. There are a total of 7,614.29 ERU's. Fiscal Year 2016 14 Office of the County Manager Capital Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-April 30, 2015 Operating Fund 109-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments 1,759,435.26 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 849,773.84 Due from Property Appraiser - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 2,609,209.10 Total Assets $ 2,609,209.10 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 12,656.73 Accrued Wages Payable - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 68,012.33 Total Liabilities $ 80,669.06 Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved 924,383.71 Excess Revenues (Expenditures) 1,604,156.33 Total Fund Balance 2,528,540.04 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 2,609,209.10 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-April 30,2015 Operating Fund 109-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 767,200.00 $ 767,200.00 $ 767,200.00 $ - Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 805,500.00 757,168.00 757,918.71 750.71 Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 1,988,900.00 1,869,564.00 1,872,094.12 2,530.12 - - Plan Review Fees - Miscellaneous(Surplus Sales,Ins.Refunds) - - 5,024.06 5,024.06 Revenue Reserve(est.5%) (139,900.00) - - - Interest 4,000.00 2,333.33 4,047.56 1,714.23 Total Operating Revenues $ 3,425,700.00 $ 3,396,265.33 $ 3,406,284.45 $ 10,019.12 Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense $ 47,200.00 $ 26,500.00 $ 23,807.76 $ 2,692.24 Emergency Maintenace and Repairs 8,800.00 - - - IT Direct Capital 300.00 150.00 150.00 IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 4,700.00 2,350.00 2,250.00 100.00 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 76,800.00 76,800.00 76,800.00 - Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 15,900.00 11,900.00 11,925.00 (25.00) Other Contractural Services 47,000.00 27,400.00 26,445.50 954.50 Telephone 3,300.00 1,900.00 1,597.02 302.98 Postage and Freight 1,300.00 100.00 - 100.00 Rent Buildings and Equipment 12,200.00 7,100.00 6,643.93 456.07 Insurance-General 1,400.00 700.00 700.00 - Printing,Binding and Copying 1,800.00 - - - Clerk's Recording Fees 1,000.00 - - - Legal Advertising 1,000.00 - - - Other Office and Operating Supplies 2,000.00 1,200.00 555.63 644.37 Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 1,100.00 900.00 1,592.64 (692.64) Total Water Management Admin Operating $ 225,800.00 $ 157,000.00 $ 152,467.48 $ 4,532.52 Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 143,100.00 $ 80,500.00 $ 71,121.04 $ 9,378.96 Engineering Fees 85,000.00 63,800.00 63,997.80 (197.80) Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 18,000.00 10,500.00 11,855.00 (1,355.00) Landscape Materials/Replanting Program 8,500.00 1,100.00 - 1,100.00 Flood Control Water Quality Testing Supplies 1,500.00 500.00 354.74 145.26 Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 20,200.00 8,400.00 7,139.10 1,260.90 Plan Review Charges 1,500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,140.00 (4,140.00) Temporary Labor 59,800.00 53,000.00 59,281.36 (6,281.36) Cell Phones 500.00 300.00 206.66 93.34 Trash and Garbage 5,300.00 3,000.00 3,041.00 (41.00) Motor Pool Rental Charge 200.00 200.00 112.70 87.30 Insurance-General 2,300.00 1,150.00 1,150.00 - Insurance-Auto 900.00 450.00 450.00 - Building Repairs&Mntc. 1,700.00 595.00 444.81 150.19 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 10,400.00 5,200.00 3,006.95 2,193.05 Fuel and Lubricants 2,800.00 1,400.00 1,181.48 218.52 Tree Triming 52,000.00 26,000.00 23,712.00 2,288.00 Clothing and Uniforms 1,100.00 1,000.00 1,102.75 (102.75) Page 1 of 3 Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 750.00 (250.00) Fertilizer and Herbicides 89,400.00 73,800.00 77,463.73 (3,663.73) Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 900.00 1,034.15 (134.15) Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 2,100.00 3,064.04 (964.04) Total Water Management Field Operating $ 509,700.00 $ 335,395.00 $ 335,609.31 $ (214.31) Right of Way Beautification-Administration Payroll Expense $ 48,700.00 $ 27,400.00 $ 24,536.90 $ 2,863.10 Emergency Repairs and Maintenance 7,400.00 - - - IT Direct and Capital 4,100.00 2,100.00 1,900.00 200.00 Office Automation 9,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 - Other Contractural Services 54,500.00 27,300.00 27,707.50 (407.50) Telephone 3,300.00 1,900.00 1,912.05 (12.05) Postage 2,200.00 900.00 - 900.00 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 14,100.00 8,200.00 7,176.88 1,023.12 Insurance-General 400.00 200.00 200.00 - Printing,Binding and Copying 2,600.00 400.00 - 400.00 Clerk's Recording 1,200.00 - - - Legal Advertising 1,200.00 - - - Office Supplies General 2,500.00 1,500.00 405.11 1,094.89 Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 1,500.00 1,500.00 2,426.89 (926.89) Total Right of Way Beautification Admin Operating $ 152,700.00 $ 75,900.00 $ 70,765.33 $ 5,134.67 Right of Way Beautification-Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 834,600.00 $ 461,700.00 $ 426,891.93 $ 34,808.07 Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 - - - Recycled Water Use 89,900.00 64,000.00 67,140.68 (3,140.68) Pest Control 2,500.00 - - - Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 1,000.00 608.26 391.74 Other Contractural Services 29,500.00 20,500.00 17,600.00 2,900.00 Temporary Labor 245,000.00 174,300.00 182,283.24 (7,983.24) Telephone 3,200.00 2,100.00 3,567.44 (1,467.44) Electricity 3,400.00 2,000.00 1,340.44 659.56 Trash and Garbage 15,900.00 8,300.00 7,353.87 946.13 Rent Equipment 2,500.00 2,500.00 6,671.35 (4,171.35) Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 100.00 - 100.00 Insurance-General 8,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 - Insurance-Auto 10,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 - Building Repairs and Maintenance 1,700.00 200.00 66.37 133.63 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 24,400.00 14,200.00 14,330.49 (130.49) Fuel and Lubricants 54,200.00 24,100.00 17,499.62 6,600.38 Licenses,Permits,Training 800.00 100.00 51.38 48.62 Tree Triming 253,000.00 222,600.00 217,250.00 5,350.00 Clothing and Uniforms 9,400.00 2,900.00 2,833.30 66.70 Personal Safety Equipment 3,000.00 2,800.00 2,897.94 (97.94) Fertilizer and Herbicides 62,000.00 27,800.00 24,588.62 3,211.38 Landscape Maintenance 51,500.00 42,500.00 42,527.10 (27.10) Mulch/Landscape Materials 52,000.00 34,700.00 33,911.65 788.35 Pathway Repairs 6,000.00 - - - Sprinkler Maintenance 30,000.00 13,300.00 11,353.78 1,946.22 Painting Supplies 800.00 100.00 - 100.00 Traffic Signs 3,000.00 2,500.00 2,349.00 151.00 Minor Operating Equipment 3,700.00 2,500.00 3,237.52 (737.52) Other Operating Supplies 9,000.00 5,300.00 5,322.18 (22.18) Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 1,814,900.00 $ 1,141,100.00 $ 1,100,676.16 $ 40,423.84 Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,703,100.00 $ 1,709,395.00 $ 1,659,518.28 $ 49,876.72 Page 2 of 3 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations Other Machinery and Equipment $ 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 23,277.14 $ 322.86 General - $ Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 23,277.14 $ 322.86 Right of Way Beautification-Field Autos and Trucks $ - $ - $ $ Other Machinery and Equipment 45,800.00 45,800.00 44,954.87 845.13 Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 45,800.00 $ 45,800.00 $ 44,954.87 $ 845.13 Total Capital Expenditures $ 69,400.00 $ 69,400.00 $ 68,232.01 $ 1,167.99 Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,772,500.00 $ 1,778,795.00 $ 1,727,750.29 $ 51,044.71 Non-Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 $ 77,300.00 $ 57,975.00 $ 57,975.00 $ - Tax Collector Fees 83,900.00 54,533.00 52,598.89 1,934.11 Property Appraiser Fees 53,800.00 45,728.00 44,975.32 752.68 Reserves(2 1/2 months for Operations) * 322,900.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 - Reserves for Equipment 136,800.00 - - - Reserved for Attrition (21,500.00) - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 653,200.00 $ 358,236.00 $ 355,549.21 $ 2,686.79 Total Expenditures $ 3,425,700.00 $ 2,137,031.00 $ 2,083,299.50 $ 53,731.50 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,259,234.33 $ 1,322,984.95 $ 63,750.62 *$200,000 transferred to 182901 Labor&Tree Trim Page 3 of 3 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-April 30, 2015 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 1,114,256.16 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles & Equipment 34,856.53 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 1,149,112.69 Total Assets $ 1,149,112.69 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 11.50 Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 64.10 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 75.60 Fund Balance Fund Balance -unreserved 796,382.04 Excess Revenue(Expenditures) 352,655.05 Total Fund Balance 1,149,037.09 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 1,149,112.69 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-April 30, 2015 Street Lighting Fund 778- FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 804,700.00 $ 804,700.00 $ 804,700.00 $ - Curent Ad Valorem Tax 462,800.00 435,032.00 435,753.96 $ 721.96 Transfer from Tax Collector - - 11.20 $ 11.20 Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) $ (23,300.00) - - $ - Interest 2,500.00 1,458.33 2,567.63 $ 1,109.30 Total Operating Revenues 1,246,700.00 1,241,190.33 1,243,032.79 1,842.46 Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense $ 47,800.00 $ 26,800.00 $ 24,057.51 $ 2,742.49 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 6,400.00 $ 6,080.00 5,950.00 $ 130.00 Other Contractural Services 34,700.00 $ 20,200.00 17,394.50 $ 2,805.50 Telephone 3,600.00 $ 2,100.00 1,167.26 $ 932.74 Postage and Freight 2,000.00 $ 200.00 - $ 200.00 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 11,800.00 $ 7,900.00 6,972.42 $ 927.58 Insurance-General 400.00 $ 200.00 200.00 $ - Office Supplies General 800.00 $ 500.00 214.64 $ 285.36 Tuition Reimbursement - $ - 857.34 $ (857.34) Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,000.00 $ 600.00 - $ 600.00 Total Street Lighting Admin Operating 108,500.00 64,580.00 56,813.67 7,766.33 Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense 68,100.00 38,300.00 33,600.86 4,699.14 Emergency Maintenance & Repairs 9,600.00 - - - Other Contractual Services 800.00 100.00 - 100.00 Cellular Telephone 500.00 300.00 217.20 82.80 Electricity 35,000.00 20,400.00 17,641.49 2,758.51 Insurance-General 800.00 400.00 400.00 - Insurance-Auto 900.00 450.00 450.00 - Building Maintenace & Repairs 1,700.00 170.00 88.00 82.00 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 2,400.00 1,200.00 1,254.75 (54.75) Fuel and Lubricants 1,000.00 500.00 286.36 213.64 Other Equipment Repairs/Supplies 200.00 - - - Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 750.00 (250.00) Electrical Contractors 7,300.00 600.00 (17,760.00) 18,360.00 Page 1 of 2 Light Bulb Ballast 13,100.00 10,900.00 16,091.80 * (5,191.80) Total Street Lighting Field Operating 141,900.00 73,820.00 53,020.46 20,799.54 Total Street Lighting Expenditures 250,400.00 138,400.00 109,834.13 28,565.87 *$11K to replace all entrance sign lights Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery/Equipment - - - - General Improvements 15,000.00 1,300.00 1,010.31 289.69 Total Capital Expenditures 15,000.00 1,300.00 1,010.31 289.69 Total Operating Expenditures 265,400.00 139,700.00 110,844.44 28,855.56 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees 14,000.00 10,500.00 8,757.92 1,742.08 Property Appraiser Fees 8,900.00 - - - Reserve for Future Construction 715,600.00 - - - Reserves (2 1/2 mos.for Operations) 56,900.00 - - - Reserves for Equipment 185,900.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures 981,300.00 10,500.00 8,757.92 1,742.08 Total Expenditures 1,246,700.00 150,200.00 119,602.36 30,597.64 Net Profit/(Loss) - 1,090,990.33 1,123,430.43 32,440.10 Page 2 of 2 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-April 30, 2015 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 150,293.73 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles & Equipment 257,697.74 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets 407,991.47 Total Assets $ 407,991.47 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 5,009.50 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities 5,009.50 Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved 59,645.27 Excess Revenues (Expenditures) 343,336.70 Total Fund Balance 402,981.97 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 407,991.47 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-April 30, 2015 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 46,134.00 $ 46,134.00 $ 46,134.00 $ - Special Assessment 118,600.00 111,500.00 111,736.96 236.96 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - - Fund 111 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 - Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) (6,000.00) - - - Interest 500.00 300.00 322.33 22.33 Total Operating Revenues $ 209,234.00 $ 207,934.00 $ 208,193.29 $ 259.29 Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees $ 67,393.35 $ 43,805.68 $ 41,879.07 $ 1,926.61 Other Contractural Services 25,822.27 $ 6,455.57 5,405.00 1,050.57 Tree Trimming 59,864.00 29,900.00 23,712.00 6,188.00 Other Equipment Repairs 1,077.77 - - - Aerial Photography 17,288.60 - - - Minor Operating 6,788.01 - - - Other Operating Supplies 2,000.00 - - - Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 180,234.00 80,161.25 $ 70,996.07 $ 9,165.18 Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees $ - - $ - $ - Licenses and Permits - - - - Other Contractual Services - - - - Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ - $ - $ - $ - Capital Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Other Machinery and Equipment $ 11,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 1,265.50 $ 934.50 Total Capital Expenditures $ 11,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 191,234.00 $ 80,161.25 $ 70,996.07 $ 9,165.18 Page 1 of 2 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 3,600.00 $ 2,520.00 $ 2,234.68 $ 285.32 Property Appraiser Fees 2,700.00 1,782.00 1,779.28 2.72 Reserves for Operations 11,700.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 18,000.00 $ 4,302.00 $ 4,013.96 $ 288.04 Total Expenditures $ 209,234.00 $ 84,463.25 $ 75,010.03 $ 9,453.22 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 123,470.76 $ 133,183.26 $ 9,712.51 Page 2 of 2 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-April 30,2015 Capital Projects Fund 322- FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 1,589,262.59 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles & Equipment 2,079,476.47 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets 3,668,739.06 Total Assets $ 3,668,739.06 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received Inv. Received 23,791.00 Total Liabilities 23,791.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance- unreserved 1,366,750.65 Excess Revenues (Expenditures) 2,278,197.41 Total Fund Balance 3,644,948.06 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,668,739.06 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-April 30, 2015 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual Amended YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 1,765,397.62 $ 1,765,397.62 $ 1,765,397.62 $ - Transfer from Fund 109 General 77,300.00 57,975.00 57,975.00 - Miscellaneous (PBF N Berm Paving Cost) - - 82,631.43 82,631.43 Special Assessment 336,400.00 315,375.00 315,828.75 453.75 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - Interest 10,800.00 6,300.00 5,251.44 (1,048.56) Total Operating Revenues $ 2,189,897.62 $ 2,145,047.62 $2,227,084.24 $ 82,036.62 Operating Expenditures: Irrigation &Landscaping Hardscape Project(50066) Engineering Fees $ 72,630.82 $ - $ - $ - Other Contractural Services 887,098.62 * 79,838.88 74,411.62 5,427.26 Rent Equipment 635.50 - - Sprinkler System Repairs 3,650.52 - - - Landscape Materials 15,165.00 15,165.00 17,858.25 (2,693.25) Permits - - - Signs& Posts (Share the Road) - - - - Electrical - - - Other Operating Supplies 3,489.25 - - - Traffic Sign Restoration Project(50103) Traffic Signs 58,260.00 29,130.00 23,791.00 5,339.00 Lake Aeration (50108) Improvements 138,175.77 * - - - North Berm Restoration (50107) Other Contractural Services 565,850.91 * 543,216.87 540,450.78 2,766.09 Beach Renourishment(50126) Other Contractural Services 200,000.00 - - - Lake Bank Project(51026) Swale &Slope Maintenance 69,048.24 6,904.82 5,188.15 1,716.67 Engineering Fees 500.00 - - - Landscape Materials 3,308.20 - - - Other Contractural Services 142,684.79 - - - Total Irrigation & Landscaping Expenditures $ 2,160,497.62 $ 674,255.57 $ 661,699.80 $ 12,555.77 Page 1 of 2 *$500,000 to N Berm Project FY 2104 *$58,600 to Lake Aeration FY 2015 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 6,316.39 $ 1,683.61 Property Appraiser Fees 4,000.00 4,000.00 5,045.36 (1,045.36) Reserve for Contingencies - - - Revenue Reserve 17,400.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 29,400.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 11,361.75 $ 638.25 Total Expenditures $ 2,189,897.62 $ 686,255.57 $ 673,061.55 $ 13,194.02 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,458,792.05 $ 1,554,022.69 $ 95,230.64 Page 2 of 2 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-May 31,2015 Operating Fund 109-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments 1,517,079.76 Interest Receivable - Improvements, Vehicles & Equipment 854,009.59 Due from Property Appraiser - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 2,371,089.35 Total Assets $ 2,371,089.35 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 17,178.51 Accrued Wages Payable - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 86,233.46 Total Liabilities $ 103,411.97 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 924,383.71 Excess Revenues (Expenditures) 1,343,293.67 Total Fund Balance 2,267,677.38 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 2,371,089.35 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-May 31,2015 Operating Fund 109-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 767,200.00 $ 767,200.00 $ 767,200.00 $ - Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 805,500.00 765,223.00 769,280.84 4,057.84 Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 1,988,900.00 1,889,453.00 1,900,148.80 10,695.80 - Plan Review Fees - - - Miscellaneous(Surplus Sales,Ins.Refunds) - - 6,158.07 6,158.07 Revenue Reserve(est.5%) (139,900.00) - - - Interest 4,000.00 2,666.67 5,016.65 2,349.98 Total Operating Revenues $ 3,425,700.00 $ 3,424,542.67 $ 3,447,804.36 $ 23,261.69 Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense $ 47,200.00 $ 31,700.00 $ 30,461.64 $ 1,238.36 Emergency Maintenace and Repairs - - - - IT Direct Capital 300.00 225.00 225.00 IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 4,700.00 3,525.00 3,375.00 150.00 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 76,800.00 76,800.00 76,800.00 - Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 15,900.00 11,900.00 11,925.00 (25.00) Other Contractural Services 47,000.00 31,300.00 31,475.50 (175.50) Telephone 3,300.00 2,200.00 1,821.34 378.66 Postage and Freight 1,300.00 100.00 - 100.00 Rent Buildings and Equipment 12,200.00 7,100.00 6,783.93 316.07 Insurance-General 1,400.00 1,100.00 1,050.00 50.00 Printing,Binding and Copying 1,800.00 200.00 101.50 98.50 Clerk's Recording Fees 1,000.00 - - - Legal Advertising 1,000.00 - - - Other Office and Operating Supplies 2,000.00 1,300.00 597.63 702.37 Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 1,100.00 1,100.00 2,092.64 (992.64) Total Water Management Admin Operating $ 217,000.00 $ 168,550.00 $ 166,709.18 $ 1,840.82 Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 143,100.00 $ 95,600.00 $ 91,158.34 $ 4,441.66 Engineering Fees 85,000.00 70,800.00 70,934.26 (134.26) Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 18,000.00 12,000.00 12,345.00 (345.00) Landscape Materials/Replanting Program 8,500.00 1,100.00 - 1,100.00 Flood Control Water Quality Testing Supplies 1,500.00 500.00 354.74 145.26 Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 20,200.00 11,800.00 11,941.62 (141.62) Plan Review Charges 1,500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,140.00 (4,140.00) Temporary Labor 59,800.00 59,800.00 61,412.40 (1,612.40) Cell Phones 500.00 300.00 276.66 23.34 Trash and Garbage 5,300.00 3,300.00 3,161.00 139.00 Motor Pool Rental Charge 200.00 200.00 112.70 87.30 Insurance-General 2,300.00 1,725.00 1,725.00 - Insurance-Auto 900.00 675.00 675.00 - Building Repairs&Mntc. 1,700.00 595.00 444.81 150.19 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 10,400.00 6,100.00 5,170.70 929.30 Fuel and Lubricants 2,800.00 1,600.00 1,181.48 418.52 Tree Triming 52,000.00 30,300.00 23,712.00 6,588.00 Clothing and Uniforms 1,100.00 1,000.00 1,131.19 (131.19) Page 1 of 3 Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 975.02 (475.02) Fertilizer and Herbicides 105,600.00 87,100.00 92,778.23 (5,678.23) Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 1,000.00 1,350.49 (350.49) Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 2,100.00 3,064.04 (964.04) Total Water Management Field Operating $ 525,900.00 $ 389,095.00 $ 389,044.68 $ 50.32 Right of Way Beautification-Administration Payroll Expense $ 48,700.00 $ 32,800.00 $ 31,396.39 $ 1,403.61 Emergency Repairs and Maintenance - - - - IT Direct and Capital 4,100.00 3,100.00 2,850.00 250.00 Office Automation 9,000.00 6,800.00 6,750.00 50.00 Other Contractural Services 54,500.00 31,800.00 32,772.50 (972.50) Telephone 3,300.00 2,200.00 2,137.37 62.63 Postage 2,200.00 900.00 40.00 860.00 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 14,100.00 8,200.00 7,381.41 818.59 Insurance-General 400.00 300.00 300.00 - Printing,Binding and Copying 2,600.00 400.00 101.50 298.50 Clerk's Recording 1,200.00 - - - Legal Advertising 1,200.00 - - - Office Supplies General 2,500.00 1,700.00 446.35 1,253.65 Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 1,500.00 1,500.00 2,888.89 (1,388.89) Total Right of Way Beautification Admin Operating $ 145,300.00 $ 89,700.00 $ 87,064.41 $ 2,635.59 Right of Way Beautification-Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 834,600.00 $ 564,200.00 $ 549,087.14 $ 15,112.86 Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 - - - Recycled Water Use 89,900.00 75,900.00 76,222.01 (322.01) Pest Control 2,500.00 - - - Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 1,300.00 1,221.32 78.68 Other Contractural Services 29,500.00 22,300.00 19,300.00 3,000.00 Temporary Labor 245,000.00 190,000.00 220,986.20 (30,986.20) Telephone 3,200.00 2,400.00 3,926.14 (1,526.14) Electricity 3,400.00 2,600.00 4,014.45 (1,414.45) Trash and Garbage 15,900.00 8,600.00 8,188.72 411.28 Rent Equipment 2,500.00 2,500.00 6,682.10 (4,182.10) Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 100.00 - 100.00 Insurance-General 8,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 - Insurance-Auto 10,000.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 - Building Repairs and Maintenance 1,700.00 200.00 66.37 133.63 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 24,400.00 16,300.00 17,194.32 (894.32) Fuel and Lubricants 54,200.00 28,100.00 19,482.66 8,617.34 Licenses,Permits,Training 800.00 100.00 51.38 48.62 Tree Triming 253,000.00 222,600.00 217,250.00 5,350.00 Clothing and Uniforms 9,400.00 3,300.00 3,040.59 259.41 Personal Safety Equipment 3,000.00 3,000.00 5,000.00 (2,000.00) Fertilizer and Herbicides 62,000.00 47,500.00 45,407.68 2,092.32 Landscape Maintenance 51,500.00 44,300.00 42,527.10 1,772.90 Mulch/Landscape Materials 52,000.00 35,300.00 41,497.85 (6,197.85) Pathway Repairs 6,000.00 - - - Sprinkler Maintenance 30,000.00 15,200.00 12,000.59 3,199.41 Painting Supplies 800.00 100.00 7.96 92.04 Traffic Signs 3,000.00 2,500.00 2,349.00 151.00 Minor Operating Equipment 3,700.00 2,800.00 3,471.02 (671.02) Other Operating Supplies 9,000.00 6,000.00 6,746.06 (746.06) Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 1,814,900.00 $ 1,310,700.00 $ 1,319,220.66 $ (8,520.66) Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,703,100.00 $ 1,958,045.00 $ 1,962,038.93 $ (3,993.93) Page 2 of 3 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations Other Machinery and Equipment $ 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 23,277.14 $ 322.86 General - $ - Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 23,277.14 $ 322.86 Right of Way Beautification-Field Autos and Trucks $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Machinery and Equipment 45,800.00 45,800.00 44,954.87 845.13 Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 45,800.00 $ 45,800.00 $ 44,954.87 $ 845.13 Total Capital Expenditures $ 69,400.00 $ 69,400.00 $ 68,232.01 $ 1,167.99 Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,772,500.00 $ 2,027,445.00 $ 2,030,270.94 $ (2,825.94) Non-Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 $ 77,300.00 $ 57,975.00 $ 57,975.00 $ - Tax Collector Fees 83,900.00 54,533.00 52,598.89 1,934.11 Property Appraiser Fees 53,800.00 45,728.00 44,975.32 752.68 Reserves(2 1/2 months for Operations) * 322,900.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 - Reserves for Equipment 136,800.00 - - - Reserved for Attrition (21,500.00) - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 653,200.00 $ 358,236.00 $ 355,549.21 $ 2,686.79 Total Expenditures $ 3,425,700.00 $ 2,385,681.00 $ 2,385,820.15 $ (139.15) Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,038,861.67 $ 1,061,984.21 $ 23,122.54 *$200,000 transferred to 182901 Labor&Tree Trim **$8,800 from Emerg.WMG Admin to Chem.Field **$7,400 from Emerg.ROW Admin to Chem WM Page 3 of 3 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-May 31,2015 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 1,101,341.30 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles & Equipment 34,856.53 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 1,136,197.83 Total Assets $ 1,136,197.83 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 1,690.00 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 1,690.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance- unreserved 796,382.04 Excess Revenue(Expenditures) 338,125.79 Total Fund Balance 1,134,507.83 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 1,136,197.83 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-May 31,2015 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 804,700.00 $ 804,700.00 $ 804,700.00 $ - Curent Ad Valorem Tax 462,800.00 439,660.00 442,601.66 $ 2,941.66 Transfer from Tax Collector - - 14.13 $ 14.13 Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) $ (23,300.00) - - $ - Interest 2,500.00 1,666.67 3,098.41 $ 1,431.74 Total Operating Revenues 1,246,700.00 1,246,026.67 1,250,414.20 4,387.53 Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense $ 47,800.00 $ 32,100.00 $ 30,836.32 $ 1,263.68 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 6,400.00 $ 6,080.00 6,025.00 $ 55.00 Other Contractural Services 34,700.00 $ 23,100.00 21,464.50 $ 1,635.50 Telephone 3,600.00 $ 2,400.00 1,331.80 $ 1,068.20 Postage and Freight 2,000.00 $ 200.00 - $ 200.00 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 11,800.00 $ 7,900.00 7,159.34 $ 740.66 Insurance-General 400.00 $ 300.00 300.00 $ - Office Supplies General 800.00 $ 500.00 256.64 $ 243.36 Tuition Reimbursement - $ - 857.34 $ (857.34) Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,000.00 $ 700.00 - $ 700.00 Total Street Lighting Admin Operating 108,500.00 73,280.00 68,230.94 5,049.06 Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense 68,100.00 44,500.00 43,138.34 1,361.66 Emergency Maintenance & Repairs 9,600.00 - - - Other Contractual Services 800.00 100.00 - 100.00 Cellular Telephone 500.00 300.00 302.84 (2.84) Electricity 35,000.00 23,300.00 17,641.49 5,658.51 Insurance-General 800.00 600.00 600.00 - Insurance-Auto 900.00 675.00 675.00 - Building Maintenace & Repairs 1,700.00 170.00 88.00 82.00 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 2,400.00 1,400.00 1,288.08 111.92 Fuel and Lubricants 1,000.00 600.00 286.36 313.64 Other Equipment Repairs/Supplies 200.00 - - - Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 1,025.00 (525.00) Electrical Contractors 7,300.00 600.00 (17,760.00) 18,360.00 Page 1 of 2 Light Bulb Ballast 13,100.00 13,100.00 16,091.80 * (2,991.80) Total Street Lighting Field Operating 141,900.00 85,845.00 63,376.91 22,468.09 Total Street Lighting Expenditures 250,400.00 159,125.00 131,607.85 27,517.15 *$11K to replace all entrance sign lights Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery/Equipment - - - - General Improvements 15,000.00 1,300.00 1,010.31 289.69 Total Capital Expenditures 15,000.00 1,300.00 1,010.31 289.69 Total Operating Expenditures 265,400.00 160,425.00 132,618.16 27,806.84 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees 14,000.00 10,500.00 8,894.87 1,605.13 Property Appraiser Fees 8,900.00 - - - Reserve for Future Construction 715,600.00 - - - Reserves (2 1/2 mos. for Operations) 56,900.00 - - - Reserves for Equipment 185,900.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures 981,300.00 10,500.00 8,894.87 1,605.13 Total Expenditures 1,246,700.00 170,925.00 141,513.03 29,411.97 Net Profit/(Loss) - 1,075,101.67 1,108,901.17 33,799.50 Page 2 of 2 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-May 31,2015 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 148,700.56 Interest Receivable - Improvements, Vehicles & Equipment 257,697.74 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets 406,398.30 Total Assets $ 406,398.30 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 3,744.00 Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd - Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities 3,744.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance -unreserved 59,645.27 Excess Revenues (Expenditures) 343,009.03 Total Fund Balance 402,654.30 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 406,398.30 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget- May 31,2015 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 46,134.00 $ 46,134.00 $ 46,134.00 $ - Special Assessment 118,600.00 112,700.00 113,409.89 709.89 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - - Fund 111 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 - Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) (6,000.00) - - - Interest 500.00 300.00 385.18 85.18 Total Operating Revenues $ 209,234.00 $ 209,134.00 $ 209,929.07 $ 795.07 Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees $ 67,393.35 $ 43,805.68 $ 41,879.07 $ 1,926.61 Other Contractural Services 25,822.27 $ 7,746.68 7,435.00 311.68 Tree Trimming 59,864.00 29,900.00 23,712.00 6,188.00 Other Equipment Repairs 1,077.77 - - - Aerial Photography 17,288.60 - - - Minor Operating 6,788.01 - - - Other Operating Supplies 2,000.00 - - - Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 180,234.00 81,452.36 $ 73,026.07 $ 8,426.29 Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees $ - - $ - $ - Licenses and Permits - - - - Other Contractual Services - - - - Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ - $ - $ - $ - Capital Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Other Machinery and Equipment $ 11,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 1,265.50 $ 934.50 Total Capital Expenditures $ 11,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 191,234.00 $ 81,452.36 $ 73,026.07 $ 8,426.29 Page 1 of 2 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 3,600.00 $ 2,520.00 $ 2,268.13 $ 251.87 Property Appraiser Fees 2,700.00 1,782.00 1,779.28 2.72 Reserves for Operations 11,700.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 18,000.00 $ 4,302.00 $ 4,047.41 $ 254.59 Total Expenditures $ 209,234.00 $ 85,754.36 $ 77,073.48 $ 8,680.88 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 123,379.64 $ 132,855.59 $ 9,475.95 Page 2 of 2 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-May 31,2015 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 1,594,646.98 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles & Equipment 2,079,476.47 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets 3,674,123.45 Total Assets $ 3,674,123.45 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received Inv. Received 174,289.00 Total Liabilities 174,289.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 1,366,750.65 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 2,133,083.80 Total Fund Balance 3,499,834.45 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,674,123.45 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget-May 31, 2015 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2015 (Unaudited) Annual Amended YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 1,765,397.62 $ 1,765,397.62 $ 1,765,397.62 $ - Transfer from Fund 109 General 77,300.00 57,975.00 57,975.00 - Miscellaneous(PBF N Berm Paving Cost) - - 82,631.43 82,631.43 Special Assessment 336,400.00 319,580.00 320,572.01 992.01 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - - Interest 10,800.00 7,200.00 5,986.91 (1,213.09) Total Operating Revenues $ 2,189,897.62 $ 2,150,152.62 $2,232,562.97 $ 82,410.35 Operating Expenditures: Irrigation &Landscaping Hardscape Project(50066) Engineering Fees $ 72,630.82 $ 7,263.08 $ 6,950.00 $ 313.08 Other Contractural Services 687,098.62 * 82,451.83 74,411.62 8,040.21 Rent Equipment 635.50 - - Sprinkler System Repairs 3,650.52 - - - Landscape Materials 15,165.00 15,165.00 17,858.25 (2,693.25) - Permits - - Signs& Posts (Share the Road) - - - - Electrical - - - Other Operating Supplies 3,489.25 - - - Traffic Sign Restoration Project(50103) Traffic Signs 58,260.00 29,130.00 23,791.00 5,339.00 Lake Aeration (50108) Improvements 138,175.77 * 138,175.77 138,155.00 20.77 North Berm Restoration(50107) Other Contractural Services 565,850.91 * 543,216.87 540,450.78 2,766.09 Beach Renourishment(50126) Other Contractural Services 200,000.00 - - - Lake Bank Project(51026) Swale &Slope Maintenance 69,048.24 13,809.65 10,581.15 3,228.50 Engineering Fees 500.00 - - - Landscape Materials 3,308.20 - - - Other Contractural Services 142,684.79 - - - Total Irrigation&Landscaping Expenditures $ 1,960,497.62 $ 829,212.21 $ 812,197.80 $ 17,014.41 Page 1 of 2 *$500,000 to N Berm Project FY 2104 *$58,600 to Lake Aeration FY 2015 *$200,000 to Reserve for Contingencies (OMB) Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 6,411.23 $ 1,588.77 Property Appraiser Fees 4,000.00 4,000.00 5,045.36 (1,045.36) Reserve for Contingencies 200,000.00 * - - - Revenue Reserve 17,400.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 229,400.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 11,456.59 $ 543.41 Total Expenditures $ 2,189,897.62 $ 841,212.21 $ 823,654.39 $ 17,557.82 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,308,940.41 $ 1,408,908.58 $ 99,968.17 Page 2 of 2 Clam Bay Update Clam Bay Copper. The April copper results from Benchmark Lab are attached.The results continue to be encouraging. USACE permit application.Several additional public comments were received in the last month. Tim Hall is working with our USACE contact person to set up a site visit with reps of the National Marine Fisheries and Fish and Wildlife. FDEP modification of 2012 dredging permit. The modified permit was issued on May 27. A copy of the cover letter is attached. Linda Roth sent an email to all PBSD Board members with the letter and the approved dredging drawings. Tidal gauges. Four Campbell Scientific Dataloggers and related equipment should be delivered in the next several weeks. The goal is to have data from the gauges in July. Adding oysters to Clam Bay. The Clam Bay Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the PBSD Board that 15 oyster recruitment stations be deployed this summer throughout the waters of Clam Bay to ascertain whether oysters can be sustained in the system at a cost not to exceed$1500. Please see the attached photos. Berm water quality samples. Tim Hall advised the Clam Bay Committee that its recommendation to collect and analyze water quality samples from the berm sites from June through October is not consistent with the Clam Plan NRPA Management Plan.Therefore the Clam Bay Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the PBSD Board that the parameters specified in the Management Plan be measured monthly for the six berm sites. Please see the attached pages from the Management Plan. Bathymetric survey. Mohamed will use the recent bathymetric survey of Clam Pass when he prepares the 2015 bathymetric report this fall. Neil will pursue funding so that Mohamed can prepare a report based on the recent bathymetric survey of the interconnecting waterway South of Clam Pass to the County Park bridge. Water quality data into STORET. Tim's staff is making progress in getting the 2012, 2013, and 2014 data into STORET. The 2015 data that include new Clam Bay sampling sites will be entered into WIN (Watershed Information Network) which is the next generation system that FDEP is expected to begin using in 2017. Grants for exotic removal. Tim provided committee members a copy of the grant that Collier County received in 2012 to remove exotics and said that grant monies for this purposed are available and could be pursued. Susan O'Brien May 28, 2015 LAM_ BAY COPPER TESTING RESULTS i ' Clam BayWater Quality Feb.'15 April <,tF.' sampling Locations ril 15 �. � r; 11 #1 1.54 4.70 -. __ Clam Bay 1 =•'� J, Legend `� #2 20.40 4.49 .�. .> '�'��" 1{ #3 1.12 3.39 . •t—c O Clam Bay Water Quality Stations -r #4 .577 .0646 • 2 av L, -t sj #5 .346 4.73 f" 1 top, wX ., ,.,� ,r.. k i :: , (x 4 i .� 'it-?..'-' ; o-y F,t� �''s fir, ��' ^, 1 #6 .346 1.71 � .. i '-: ,� `r� f=,� �'r' ;� -';' • 1 `! iii' 1 p •9,• ..::^F I #7 .346 .942 f f �,� M, " �,�r, -I IS,F , #8 .346 1.69 • - , , ���,f,`",�: * £ i 21,4:34,1:',.-,. ,,. �x:: e. #9 .346 1.51 t' } ' �� ,./‘ t ,� °. :� • . Bay 2 4-• €. , rY '>iy 'q.;+,. .ry lr Z-i 5S'` ' Y 1 r .moi ,�, . I Impaired = greater than 3.7 ug/1 ? ..� I4•• ' ,•" t� .:I - . �•: ^ ▪"� int 'r it r r � •, .q I:',. .`/.'': , �: s}, k' ti ',,.. rE,y � s ` _ .'} 1 3Y ry .3 � N lrC.. N t.♦ it ,.may ,. Clam Bay 3 n. . r ; , ,•e, -- ' _ _ �.lL 1t � �1T Upper Clam Bay(CB 1 12.0 2011 ,8.8 2012,1.5 2/15 �'- a ..:,i.,4;,..,,,...,.‘-:14:h . t .' t4 fkii h r;+ I F Ppe ) ( ) ( ) ( ) y . ' i wr Inner Clam Bay(CB 3:57(2011),5.7(2012),1.1 (2/15) ..,a4* •^J- '� c Outer Clam Bay(CB 6) 1.6(20110 1.0(2012),ND(2/15) ` d,,, rs - - t1''MjJ � r'"� r } - i� r.4 r i }t .et= 20 ares f '� eu � Clam Bay 4 f ifs f f Y pr ,, s , 'y�q ch Joys...., •,..,-.-c-:,4 e,• ., y :i-v.n .�ya+�-;tom � ' ,/�-'t y t •tx . ; 4' ...�., ,..A .(4,.....„-.:,„,,,,,,f4„,.-.. a '.,'�weJ*e J r P,.t 6 r T �a ti4 f t ii .. ... `.-- % l�. „-4,..•-...--------',i;' °-.7,.,e.%,,� r vs til,..- ';' • ,10 a` ,1 uc` ” °• 7'. e `` J""3. r--1i 'Ci7 9 ' mow.•,. "` v r , ... ' v }371�. •t P‘ .� .• Mt4 �r det .�ttl , o . N . .., 1 I "20 Clam Ba Sampling Locains 2009 ., i \ritt .1: ' iniwiss , M •e e,f •:iry". � •rir �r < ir`ic ef cr � � } •am3 - �— V\T *,D4'''''r41:44; IlEtation tat •n. .' ,rt'6 { — .""424 `Fxam Bay 1 81 49.008 2614.61 Clam Bay 2 81 48.986 26 14.277 ! a Clam Bay 5 :�' "z ! i }lt,-, Clam Bay 3 81 48.965 2613.869 } _. 4.;.;:'•-------- i j '"3't'- H • 's'' -''�, �11' - - 8149.034 2613.636 , •' ,, , _ ; Clam Bay 4 ,- w a T ,4 X _▪ s• . r . r �, Clam 8148.824 2613.010 _.--____.. 3�4 n h Clam Bay 5 )� Clara Bay 6 v .x�.,' � Bay 6 8148.868 2612.800 _ x t f{T�a� y y� " a Bay 7 81 48.953 2612.682 I --f ...:4.1z.,-,..A.. , r • { t• «. Clam Ba 8 Bay 81 48.766 26 12 65,E " Clam Bay 8 • .' ° 3� f� # �rw. t .ci:E. �.f �y Clam Bay 9 '8148.586 2612.654 '` ! �� Clam Bay 9 ,� " :7 - ' Clam Bay 7 s .t."11. •, - r .. r•""'•.n sr .�.. L..:.. :..: z. �r.�l. _.. r ',1i,;.-ii,-144"4. - -rte-illiC( . �. Sa_ iP:� .,_ , � t Ar 01,0100NRICK SCOTT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNOR • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CARLOS LOPEZ-CANTERA BOB MARTINEZ CENTER LT.GOVERNOR o.FLOR I A 2600 BLAIRSTONE ROAD TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 32399-2400 JONATHAN P.STEVERSON SECRETARY May 27,2015 W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator Pelican Bay Services Division Collier County 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 605 Naples,FL 34108 c/o Brett Moore,P.E. Humiston&Moore Engineers 5679 Strand Court Naples, FL 34110 Permit Modification No. 0296087-003-JN Permit No. 0296087-001-JC, Collier County Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Minor Modification Dear Mr. Moore: Your request to modify Permit No. 0296087-001-JC was received on March 18,2015, and has been reviewed by Florida Department of Environmental Protection(Department) staff. The proposed permit modification is to revise the channel configuration and fill template to be consistent with the Clam Bay Natural Resource Protection Area(NRPA)Management Plan that was approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on January 13, 2015. Specifically,the channel will be redesigned to not exceed 100 feet in width at any location and to not encroach within 15 feet of existing mangroves growing in water depths less than-2 feet mean high water(MHW)or within 5 feet of existing mangroves growing in water depths greater than, or equal to, -2 feet MHW. The channel will also be shortened slightly to end at station 17+00, the dredge depths will be slightly reduced,and the inlet throat will be flared so that it closely mimics the natural inlet cross section at stable inlet conditions. The fill template will be slightly adjusted to include a dune and ensure sufficient placement capacity for future maintenance dredging events. Background On August 14, 2012, the Department issued Permit No. 0296087-001-JC to Collier County to restore the alignment of Clam Pass to the previously-approved location and to conduct periodic maintenance dredging of a portion of the Clam Pass Channel in order to maintain tidal exchange between Clam Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. The permit authorized approximately 22,000 cubic Notice of Permit Modification Permit Modification No.0296087-003-JN Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Minor Modification Page 2 of 7 yards of sand to be dredged from approximately 1800 feet of Clam Pass. The beach-compatible sand was to be placed north of the Pass,along Pelican Bay Beach, and south of the Pass, along Collier County Clam Pass Park Beach. Additionally,the meandered channel location was to be filled with beach-compatible sand. For additional background,please see the Consolidated Notice of Intent to Issue Joint Coastal Permit and Authorization to Use Sovereign Submerged Lands for Permit No. 0296087-001- JC at the following website: ftp://ftp.dep.state.fl.us/pub/ENV- PRMT/collier/issued/0296087 %20Clam%20Pass/001 JC/Intent/ On March 1, 2013,the Department issued Permit Modification No. 0296087-002-JN to Collier County to change the Permittee from Coastal Zone Management to the Pelican Bay Services Division,both of which are branches of Collier County. The modification also revised the channel configuration and the slopes of the placement areas to correspond with the designs authorized by the Nationwide Permit(SAJ-1996-02789 (NWP-WDD))from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(Corps). In addition,the modification revised the Sediment Quality Assurance/Quality Control(QA/QC)Plan and clarified that sand dredged during the initial channel realignment would be placed in the area affected by the channel meander,which is located on the north shore of the realigned channel through the beach. Justification The modification request is to amend the permit to be consistent with the NRPA Management Plan. The NRPA management plan was developed over 20 months with technical input from multiple stakeholders. The purpose of the plan is to provide guidance and direction for the protection,preservation, and maintenance of the Clam Bay Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA). The NRPA management plan recommends reshaping the inlet throat so that the inlet closely mimics the natural inlet cross section at stable inlet conditions. Reshaping the inlet will enhance the stability of the dredged inlet,potentially reducing the frequency of maintenance dredging under normal conditions. Staff Assessment Staff has reviewed the proposed activity, and has determined that the revisions to the project will not cause adverse environmental impacts. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission(FWC)has also reviewed the request, and has no objections to the proposed activity. Notice of Permit Modification Permit Modification No.0296087-003-JN Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Minor Modification Page 3 of 7 The project description and project location shall be revised as follows(ctrikethrougha are deletions,underlines are additions): PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is to restore the alignment of Clam Pass to the previously approved location and to conduct periodic maintenance dredging of a portion of the Clam Pass Channel in order to maintain tidal exchange between Clam Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. Approximately 22,000 11,600 cubic yards of sand will be dredged from approximately 1800 feet( 549 meters) 1,700 feet of Clam Pass. The inlet throat(Stations 0+00 to 3+64.5)will be graded as necessary to shape the inlet so that it closely mimics the natural inlet cross section at stable inlet conditions. The beach-compatible sand will be placed north of the Pass, along Pelican Bay Beach, and south of the Pass, along Collier County Clam Pass Park Beaches to a design berm elevation of+5 feet NAVD. Beach-compatible sand will also be used to reconstruct the dune along the south fill template as necessary to an elevation of+6.5 feet NAVD. Additionally,the meandered channel location will be filled with beach:compatible sand during the initial channel realignment. PROJECT LOCATION: The dredging is located in Clam Pass,between R-41 and R-42,and the placement locations are located to the north of the Pass, along Pelican Bay Beach,between R- 39+733 + D n,40 R-39+724 and R-41+117,to the south of the Pass, Collier County Clam Pass Park Beaches,between R 42+180 and R 44+100 R-42 and R-44+387,near the southern boundary of the county park,and in the area affected by the channel meander at approximately R-41, in Collier County, Section 8 and 9,Township 49 South,Range 25 East,Gulf of Mexico, Class III Waters. The set of approved permit drawings shall be revised as follows: The permit drawings(13 pages,certified February 18,2013)that previously replaced the original set of permit drawings under Modification No. 0296087-002-JN will be replaced by the revised set of approved permit drawings(12 pages,certified March 30, 2015),which are attached to this modification. After thorough review of your application, staff fords that the proposed modification is not expected to adversely affect water quality or be contrary to the public interest. Staff has also determined that the proposed alteration does not increase the potential for adverse impact on the coastal system,public beach access seaward of the mean high water line or nesting sea turtles and hatchlings and their habitat,and that the proposed alteration does not reduce the design adequacy of the project. Since the proposed modification is not expected to result in any adverse environmental impact or water quality degradation,the permit is hereby modified as stated above. By copy of this letter and the attached drawings,we are notifying all necessary parties of the modification. Notice of Permit Modification Permit Modification No.0296087-003-JN Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Minor Modification Page 4 of 7 This letter of approval does not alter the August 14,2022, expiration date or the Specific Conditions of the permit. This letter and the attached drawings must be attached to the original permit. This permit is hereby modified unless a sufficient petition for an administrative hearing is timely filed under Sections 120.569 and 120.57,Florida Statutes(F.S.),as provided below. The procedures for petitioning for a hearing are set forth below. Mediation under Section 120.573, F.S., is not available for this proceeding. NOTICE OF RIGHTS A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's action may petition for an administrative proceeding(hearing)under Sections 120.569 and 120.57,F.S. The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed(received by the clerk) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard,Mail Station 35, Tallahassee,Florida 32399-3000. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to redetermine fmal agency action on the application,the filing of a petition for an administrative hearing may result in further modification of the permit or even a denial of the application. If a sufficient petition for an administrative hearing or request for an extension of time to file a petition is timely filed,this permit modification automatically becomes only proposed agency action on the application subject to the result of the administrative review process. Accordingly,the applicant is advised not to commence construction or other activities under this permit modification until the deadlines noted below for filing a petition for an administrative hearing or request for an extension of time has expired. Under Rule 62-110.106(4),Florida Administrative Code(F.A.C.), a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's action may also request an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing. The Department may, for good cause shown, grant the request for an extension of time. Requests for extension of time must be filed with the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard,Mail Station 35, Tallahassee,Florida 32399-3000,before the applicable deadline. A timely request for extension of time shall toll the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. If a request is filed late,the Department may still grant it upon a motion by the requesting party showing that the failure to file a request for an extension of time before the deadline was the result of excusable neglect. In the event that a timely and sufficient petition for an administrative hearing is filed, other persons whose substantial interests will be affected by the outcome of the administrative process have the right to petition to intervene in the proceeding. Any intervention will be only at the discretion of the presiding judge upon the filing of a motion in compliance with Rule 28- 106.205,F.A.C. Notice of Permit Modification Permit Modification No.0296087-003-JN Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Minor Modification Page 5 of 7 In accordance with Rule 62-110.106(3),F.A.C.,petitions for an administrative hearing by the applicant must be filed within 14 days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than the applicant, and other than those entitled to written notice under Section 120.60(3),F.S.,must be filed within 14 days of publication of the notice or within 14 days of receipt of the written notice,whichever occurs first. Under Section 120.60(3),F.S.,however,any person who has asked the Department for notice of agency action may file a petition within 14 days of receipt of such notice,regardless of the date of publication. The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of filing. The failure of any person to file a petition for an administrative hearing within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to request an administrative determination(hearing)under Sections 120.569 and 120.57,F.S. In accordance with Rule 28-106.201,F.A.C., a petition that disputes the material facts on which the Department's action is based must contain the following information: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number,if known; (b) The name,address, and telephone number of the petitioner;the name,address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative,if any,which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests are or will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none,the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged,including the specific facts that the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes that the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action,including an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes;and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. A petition that does not dispute the material facts on which the Department's action is based shall state that no such facts are in dispute and otherwise shall contain the same information as set forth above, as required by Rule 28-106.301,F.A.C. Under Sections 120.569(2)(c) and(d), Notice of Permit Modification Permit Modification No.0296087-003-JN Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Minor Modification Page 6 of 7 F.S., a petition for administrative hearing must be dismissed by the agency if the petition does not substantially comply with the above requirements or is untimely filed. This action is fmal and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a petition is filed in accordance with the above. Upon the timely filing of a petition this order will not be effective until further order of the Depai talent. This permit modification constitutes an order of the Department. The applicant has the right to seek judicial review of the order under Section 120.68,F.S.,by the filing of a notice of appeal under Rule 9.110 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard,Mail Station 35,Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000; and by filing a copy of the notice of appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate district court of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date when the fmal order is filed with the Clerk of the Department. When there has been no publication of notice of agency action or notice of proposed agency action as prescribed in Rule 62-110.106,F.A.C., a person may request a copy of the agency action. The Department shall upon receipt of such a request,if agency action has occurred, promptly provide the person with notice. The Department does not require notice of this agency action to be published. However,the applicant may elect to publish notice as prescribed in Rule 62-110.106,F.A.C.,which constitutes notice to the public and establishes a time period for submittal of any petition. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact Kristina May by email at kristina.may(a�dep.state.fl.us or by telephone at(850) 245-7545. Sincerely, Martin K. Seeling,Administrator Beaches,Inlets and Ports Program Attachment: Approved Revised Drawings(12 pages) Notice of Permit Modification Permit Modification No.0296087-003-JN Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Minor Modification Page 7 of 7 cc: Marty Seeling, DWRM Luke Davis,FWC Ralph Clark, DWRM Brianne McGuffie, Corps,Ft. Myers Permits Section Jennifer Coor,DWRM Gary McAplin,Collier County Vince George,DWRM Tim Hall,Turrell,Hall and Associates JCP Compliance Officer, Theodore J. Raia,Jr.,M.D., The Mangrove Action Group DWRM Linda Roth Chiu Cheng, DWRM FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED,on this date,pursuant to Section 120.52,Florida Statutes,with the designated Department Clerk,receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. 05/27/2015 Deputy Clerk Date .4014:- Example of the test sites for o ster recruitment. +�,`r.. .0110 Example of raw shell hung to recruit oyster spat. CLAM BA YNRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN Pelican Bay Services Division October 2014 Ver. 6.5 FDEP did determine that the Clam Bay system was impaired for copper and placed the Clam Bay system on the Everglades West Coast verified list for copper with medium TMDL priority(5 to 10 years for TMDL development). TMDL(Total Maximum Daily Load) is defined by the FDEP as the maximum amount of a given pollutant that a surface water can absorb and still meet water quality standards. Subsequent copper testing undertaken by PBSD has also shown periodic elevated levels of copper within the Clam Bay Class II waters. Beginning in 2015 PBSD's water quality monitoring program in the Clam Bay NRPA system will employ the sampling program used to establish the SSAC. Sampling locations within the open waters of the NRPA will be increased and relocated from the 5 historical locations to the 9 locations subsequently established. These 9 locations are shown on Figure 18. Sampling will continue to be collected on a monthly basis. The suite of parameters collected and analyzed from the water samples will also be amended as outlined below in order to provide the information necessary to more easily interpret the compliance with the newly established SSAC. • Field pH • Field Temperature • Field Salinity • Field Specific Conductance • Field Dissolved Oxygen(mg/1) • Field Dissolved Oxygen(% Saturation) • Ammonia • Chlorophyll a • Copper • Nitrate-Nitrite (NO3-NO2) • Nitrite (NO2) • Total Nitrogen • Orthophosphate (OPO4) • Pheophytin • Total Phosphorous The PBSD is developing an upland stormwater and nutrient management program that builds upon the Nutrient Management Plan previously completed for the Pelican Bay Foundation(Turrell,2013). The Foundation Plan and ongoing nutrient management efforts in process by the PBSD are designed to reduce nutrient and copper inputs into the stormwater system. Once completed,the PBSD program will be reviewed by the FDEP. If copper concentrations in the NRPA are reduced as a result of the implementation of the program,the FDEP could consider removal of the Clam Bay NRPA system from the impaired list. The information garnered from the PBSD's nutrient monitoring and management activities will be important in guiding future decision making associated with water quality concerns in the Clam Bay NRPA. PBSD will work closely with the Pelican Bay Foundation and adjacent communities on nutrient management issues to coordinate and share information that may be integrated into management decisions and activities undertaken through this Management Plan. 34 CLAM JAY NRPA MANAGEMENT PLAN Pelican Bay Services Division October 2014 Ver. 6.5 _ . ,,-- 5* „,--' - , ,,,, ••d, VI•LV• ” .• --, , •14..., " . it,,,F. ,..-1 + le., • -,e'‘ - t.,-;, -: - • e'' '1,41-", P i • "'. t * -.` ..." ' i ' - '!1.1t r''.,. 1-‘41,A'41!*4."‘ ')41'1.;,44. .'' ',,'• ' a -1 '. - edti•. '-` ,i:AW, ,:, tk .Y7_ .,, •(.0., 4,0„ty .... - e.0.4for ,Ls, ,, ,fy „ ..„ ..t 4 ...,,--, ,„.4 ,,..3,••+%„,„„,,. . 1 a 1,,,rrs'...e, 04;1 . `ir, \ ,.,(7.,- ." - ii rot., e, V",' 4.} -:•'d...? , ,.'"1. •1' ..-Z1 ,I ”.-.--'7:*".., ''' ..• .. ..:0 ,;,,, -:..111.' b—ri _ -.:t. 5firei c„.2 -2.,...e. iig ..,5 ruler: ,- A __7'" - _i:AA t., je* -‘' --,t-,,- - ' --- -- -I, •. 4363 3° Al -!..4,IA '. MN UPDATED LOCA PON IN NRPA 8,168' RpA 57.0 *''. 47iii41, 11.1 UPDATED LOCA077N ADJACENT TO N : , , .,,04 --;., , -0134•1644ti .7... ,. ,?,....,A .4,_ .m,1 4, !::7_, 4::::1:-`/4.7--; :, EXISTING LOCATION ADJACENT TO NRPA .,' .; ir ,, -=: -,... -.... .,,, .,....,.. .,-,---1 . ,,,g -,it-oir: :... . , ..„Ip.-.2-; , ..,.,,,i --14*- „,,,,,,, i 43 "s5° ---7 atai ,A • t 0 .1: -,, „: : ..... 3° A .- '4- ‘., 0 A • C4 -. CI ,--.' 'N,V.# 0, 0.'A' 11 I:•-.1 4-14r.:14; 1 ' * - ..'':-,'', 41,- ::-....,.7,,R..,*„.'4,1 ,.:,.3 'N..' . " \ '-•'*, :# ''''' '''.7 . 1: .4.i' :::*'- .,,,,u . r. - , .k , • : ,,,,„, 1„.• E. ••: -.i '1/4..;1....-441 `., ..,..0.44 84 ' 'A' ';'-' '4-ri•IP4- I 41 , ./ '' '•" '' ; -I 8 1 ,•+ , 4.- --"0"--1);.4 a .... , ; 1";'-4''' e '' ei3.43. "b.'' x•if.-' 1,.&-- *41: '1'1.2,-*1 '`-.7: ;11N •23115° -.."-.• • - i i------ -,..-ergt:., , , . 1 1 **2 * • ' -.,t.., .1-- '40): '?!r ' :' •:. ;1.1:33° ‘ # 2'0' '-"--44.-V,V • f '''• ,..;r),•11;11*'4 42.' F.sr. 26: 6672.: ...").'',,,1.41..p ',$'. .,"4.,,IL'.. •04 LUCIA^ 0.812835 "t• 4.,-7'; . 4 ''- .• .17: - it 4--rv,4-' - .t- )ef° "-- 7•", Au*:.* '-• ' "..r...t• -If.4 .: 1.0"......tt• .4,11,.., 11I7.,• ....• * w,-- • 7"".•. Pa."4 ,.., , I...„ s ,..e.. . - ,-, . . ,W,.14* - .... - , • • . ' d-ti Ail "4- =,*- - ' -• • *,,,, .- - Ir. ..: _ .., 1 396 1 . -*IA 4,'• g'iligavtiaggiet.. - , '.T. 2.,,,,,,.- •- -• .a. , *- -- I , , i4,,, ,... .sh -‘ '' "54'.? -4+."-t..4.• It.,),,k41 -,.... : ^.1., • ',!! - ,, V, ..„... -,.;;,,,o ••• , • :,.....-kirti t„-.., ,.r;:;,,z,..'••• - t: 11 4. , - , _,,,I,, .6'4-.7`.• .*-, tr;. -. 1'.' - min :- :- t,...,,,..'Yilp-Nsr kl'iririk 1 •ii.r.'i: ..-Ipt,!4i Ili. 26.21 ? ;.;-- • ',!.. ° _.....2„..'.' .1, 'i,'-.' 4,,,k ;A* !I.! • °"' ;..L, c ...„,/, 21 • 33° I ' • 7`1%.41,°' lt-'0•1 , tF.),1i. 813- *• 13t1-EVVI-4W ' , - ' t'0 s-'4-1,,,,;3,.).11-• 74,z,,,-,,,: - 3* ,- • i.01't• ••!:,,--•`°::1,-' --sortt., - ..,..,-, .,-,:7: ,,, ; ,__. , ...., difrf a.. ., • • .e... -......4' -, 1 '- it.:.-- .4";F:.-,.Y• .., ,,,4.1,,P.y,f i '` ."' i'. . filillr_,,,, ',. i. Ojujoa.,41 • ,, __,..... , , k . .• .. ,•`...,, . n..., ri„. .y ' ..;".;ep lr;.,-'; ' 8 4-•so ' 4.• Vt.46Cf'r 'EA'..'i'... " . 2621 r' tr47..V. ,7; AV,13_LX`i.'',.t: n4, mlii.,•,,..,_,..., T.,,--.4,i :,...„,ex.,,,,..:1 - ' ,- ' *4-1.:60-mr.-.7,4.'.:, ,,,.••. 0, . i -, 1 -44, --,. , ,.....* vow,,.::: - •4„,4,,,„, t.i,x..,.”.*.I•.,v,'')A.;-..y,,,,"sr • +,.':..:1to:4. ,6F:-‘....,5),; ,44,,A1°t,... Figure 18:Proposed Water Quality monitoring locations within and adjacent to the NRPA boundary 35 Legend Pelican Bay Foundation Inc. : Sod-FDTN = 10,331 sf, 0.24 ac Landscape-FDTN = 251,769 sf, 5.78 ac Pelican Bay Foundation Inc. within Drainage Easements Sod-FDE = 387,979 sf, 8.91 ac Landscape-FDE = 593,488 sf, 13.62 ac Pelican Bay Foundation Inc. within Ordinance Sod-Ord = 192,635 sf, 4.42 ac Landscape-Ord = 667,393 sf, 15.32 ac Pelican Bay Services Division Sod = 965,337 sf, 22.16 ac SCSI$43 B;1412 Landscape = 948,783 sf, 21.78 ac