The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 09/25/1990 R Lg? %? B! NI~.NBgMID, that the ~oard of County Commlmaloners in Itr~d for the County of Collier, and milo acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and ss the governing board(e) of such speci&l dtstricts as h~vs b~en created according to law and having conducted buslnes9 Ilereln, ut on this date at 9:00 A.N. In RE~ULAIt SESSION tn Building 'g' of the ~vern~nt Complex, last Naples, Florida, with the £ollo~lng uml>ers present: CHAIRNAN: VICE-CHAIRNAN: Nlchael J. Volpe Richard S. Shanahan Burr L, Saunders Anne Goodntght Al,SO i~gSggI'r Jaua C. Giles, Clerk; Wands Arrighl, Annette Ouevln, and Ellis Roffun, Deputy Clerks; Non McLesore, Assistant COunty I~nager; Jennifer Pike, Assistant to the County ~nager; Ken ~yler, C~nty Attorney; Nike Mc~eee, ~ge~nt and Budget Director; NIIIIia ~renz, gnviron~tal Se~lcee Administrator; Nlllla~ Laverty, Or--th ~Mgmnt Plan~r; ~rge Archi~ld, Trans~rtation Services ~lnistrator; Frank 8ruff, Co~nity ~elop~nt Services ~inistrator; Toe Contacts, Office of Capital Projects Hanageeent Director; Cliff Cra~ford. Parks & Recreation Director; Dave Daven~rt, C~e ~lience ~rt~nt; ~e~e Arnold, B~an Milk, Robert ~lhere, ~ ~ S~deh, Planners; and ~ty Byron Toallnson, Sheriff's Of/ice. Page 1 him ,l September 25, 1990 Commissioner Sl~sr~Lhaa moved, s~conded by Commissioner Goodnlght led ~lrrlet ~lnsly, tht th ~ a c~ent ag~ ~ 1, Item 9A2 - R~estJng the ~ard of County Commissioners grant 'appr~al to enter into an lnterlocal agreement for the collection of fire district l~act fees, fire districts: East Naples, North Naples, ~rco Island and Big CorkecreN (Custo~r Semites) - ~ded. Item lOB - Re~olution requesting tax information for the Depart~nt of Revenue regarding the Tourist Tax - (County Attorney Cu¥1er) - Added. Item 12B - ZRO impact on Everglades City [Commissioner Ooodnight) - A~ded. Item 12C - Discussion regarding provisional use for a Moose [,odge facility st Golden Gate Boulevard and 13th Street, S.N. (Commissioner Naa~4~) - ~. lisa 6C6 - Re Petition SPiP-90-17, Milliam Schwelkhardt, Trustee requesting Subdivision l~aster Plan approval for Airport Road Joint Venture - Continued at the Petitioner and Staff's request to October 2, 1990. Assistant County ld~nager Hc[~more stated that it is Staff's request to co~ttnua Item 6C10 Petition AV-89-030, regarding an ease- lent, however, there ars representatives of Scotty's present from out Of tos~n. Ne suggested that ~r~ t~ ~ard continue this item after hlri~ th lr presentation ~cause o~ the zoning issues Involved. C~Jlii~r lau~ro iikt4 to have Item 12C explained as to what ~3y this Ii. Co~ileloner ~lltt rei~nded th4t this ts a 4~elon for t~ ~ople to ~ heard on this issue, and have the line resolved ~ the ~ard. Cose~isaloner Goodnlght requemted that Item 12B be heard at 6:00 P.N., arid added that there frill be 200 people arriving by bus to be h~ar~ at 6:00 P.M. regarding this issue. Commissioner Ooodnight requested that Item 9F2 be heard at 10:00 becat~e J)~ople from l~kal~ ~uld ~ arriving at t~t tt~. ~ilsio~r ~~ asked If there ~as any back-up for Item 12A? ~Js~l~r Vol~ confi~ t~t he M tnfor~tlon and districted Page 2 September 25, [990 Jt to the Board Mmb~rl. Item Colmilllioner Hasle presented the Elployee Service Award to the employee: John A. Walters - Parka · Recreation years Legal notice having been publllhed in the Naples Daily News on September 6, 1990, at evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, i~Jblic hearing wal oi)ened to consider Petition R-90-24, filed by Robert DUalS of Hole, Montes and A~soctates, Xnc., reprelenting The Greek Orthodox Church of Maples and Vicinity, requmltJng m rezone from A-2 to 'PIJD* planned unit development for the pro~)mrty located et th~ sout h~elt corner of Airport Road and Emerald La]cea Sou lev&rd In Section 2, To~nlhip 49 South, Rang. 25 Planner Ssadah listed that the petitioner iN r-queqting to rezone I B,] ~ acre parcel to a church PUD to allow for a p~rl~h hall, rJCel, cl4slrooal, and m sanctuary. Pllulner Saadlh advised that the subject property Is currently zormd A-2 and Il occupied by 4 plant nursery. He explained that to th~ north Il Emerald [.mkel Boulevard m~ u~evelo~d A-2 land propoaed for m future activity center; to the emma lm Airport Ro4d end the VA~mrdm ~D; to the ~th tm A-2 land with an exAmtlng nurmery; and to t~ ~mt Am ~rmld ~em ~D. ~. ~h relmtmd t~t s~eral County mgenclem have r~tewed the ~tJtlon, a~ their concmrnm and mtl~lmtionm have been incor~rat~d In t~ ~ ~mnt, Hr. 9~h dimclo~d that ~r. Chrtmtophmr Smith, pro.ray ~er to t~ ~rth In t~ future activity center, expremmed concernm to Staff / 000,,; 09 Page 3 9eptember 25, i990 ar~$ the Planning Coma lesion that · church on the adjacent property wo~ld restrict the uae of ·lcoholic b~verages on the premises of his pro~erty and would cause him to h·ve to obtain an alcoholic waiver which Hr. Smith feels creates · development hardship on this property. Hr. Saadeh re~rted that no other corres~ndence has been received e~ther for or against this ~tJtion. He stated that the CCPC reviewed this ~tJtion Septe~r 6, 1990, and by a vote of 6/0 recommended this ~tJt$~ for a~r~al, aub~ect to the ~evJsed mtipu]attona of the · ~J~J~ at·ff. He advised t~t the revised stipulations h·ve been Jnco~rated into t~ ~ ~nt. Hr. Sa·deb confirmed to Coaai~aloner Hesse that the ~ub~ect peti- tion Jm a ~O rezone a~d ia compatible ~lth the ~rowth Nanageeent Plan a~ the mite ~uld ~ke a g~ transitional use. Co~JmeJoner Volp requeeteo clarification aa to the legal eight- tic·rice o~ why this petition ia presented as a rezone and not a provl- lion] ~ae? Nr. S~deh expJaJfled that pr~JlJonaI ;aaa are good for one year ~ rentable ~or ~eeJbly one ~re ye·r which do~. not all~ enough ti. for the ~tJtJonerm to ac~Jr, the necemmary ~mount of funds to COflet~ct the ~ildlnge planned. Comiesion~ Vo]~ que~tioned if St~ff Is ~ccept~b~e to extending tM completion of sub~ect ~tition ~e~ the period of time ~lo~ed for · ~ezo~ ~lch il ten ye~r~? Hr. S~deh lckn~]edged that ~hen the ~tltion ~ received It ~ ~ugge~ted to the client t~at It be s~b- ~Itted Jot provialonal uae, h~ever, because of the timing for the client it ~as decided to subatt it for ~ezone. He added that Staff ~ ~ p~obJem with thle decision. ~$ee$o~ Haeee emp~mized t~t he did not wish to see the ~1~d1N of thJl church dragged out over ~ long ~Fiod ot time. ~$eeJoner Sau~ere euggeeted t~t the ~tltloner be heard 4t ~Jl tJ~ to diane t~ rea~n for ch~Jng a rezone lnetead of p~lll~l u~ ~ the tial~ of this project. Jo~ ~e of Hole, ~ntee ~ A.eocJatee, Inc., repreeenting the Page 4 S~ptember 25, 1990 Greek Orthodox Church of Waplee and Vicinity, stated that there were several rea~ona for going with the rezone petition. He commented that the congregation numbers elx~t 70 which does not provide a physical tm~ to conplete a church within one o~ t~ years. He explained that the phase-in develop~nt plan is to ~ild an office on site and a · ~11 gathering hall which ~11 eventually ~ replaced by a church. He re~rted that the Greek Ort~ox Church want~ to be ~ure tha~ zoning t~t the~ obtain will ~rnJt then to ~lld the facilities they ~ve planned when th~ have the ~ney to do es two or three year~ from ~. He ~ted t~t the pr~ielona] uae program does not p~ovide for their meade. He ~lnted out that planned unit developments are ailed for churches Jn this zoning district and meets the time frame r~ired. In reaches to CoemJseJoner Saundere, Mr. ~ee coeaented that the conet~ction for t~ office ~JJding and gathering hall ~tll be within a year or eighteen ~nthe as the fu~e are received. Co~leeioner Saunders a.ked AllJeta~t County Attorney Student pr~JeJo~ uae ~ae granted for leveraj cinctures of a piece of pro- ~rty such a. a gathering hall, office building and 4 ~urch, and conet~ctJon of the gathering hal] or office building began within the o~ year ~ri~, or a t~ year ~ri~ If It wa. extended, would there ~ ~ ar~nt ~ the pro~rty ~er that the ~rovleJo~a~ Mia for ~tire project ~co~e vested ~ virtue o~ ~o~ significant financial Jflveet~nt In a ~rtion of t~ project? Ael~et~t County Attorney Student replied that there could very ~1~ ~ t~t ar~nt ~cauee they have started one aspect of the ~elo~nt. · pJ~d unit develop~nt la In effect no different than a provi- IJ~J m in this case. He ~inted out that if they ~ve a provJ- eJ~l ~e ~ started construction, they would be vested which also ~JJel to a pl~d unit d~elo~nt. AllJetaflt C~nty Attorney Student stated that she has some concern 000,. 11 Page September 25, 1990 regarding the ti~e fra~ of the one-year provisional uae or if it is extended to two years, because within this tl~e frame a building per- lit would have to be requested, and If requested for only one building tM question then arises would they be ve~ted ~or the other structures tMt re. in to ~ In tam.nme to Commimiloner Haeme, Planner Nine replied that they are ~t t~Jng to cir~ent any condition, ~t what became apparent tO ~ta~f was t~t there Je no legal ~thod to deny ~ petition for a ~O ~cau~e the only ~nch~rk that a PUD needs is to be five ac~es in lize which this c~for~a to. ~e ~inted out that this is the to~ fr~rk that Staff ~ to ~rk ~lth, and Just because Staff ~t like single ~r~ee ~D'g there lo no legal basis to deny such an mpplication. t~t the entire ~erehip including the eaaeaen~ are taken into con- eiderat Ion. Comics Jeer Vol~ re~rked t~t it Je his understanding that ~teff Je drafting an a~nd~nt ~hJch in the future ~ill preclude t~e or single ~r~ae ~D'o, a~ ~eotioned ~hether this is true? r~Jro mixed uae ~D'I. He e~mlzed that this will ~ the ~bJect of considerable co~fllty debate over the next slx to twelve Mr. ~e clarified that the p~olng schedule ~fl the ~JD may move fo~erd ~re quickly t~n the ten years all.ed; and tt the funding t~ ac~tr~ ~Jore then, the ~tltlonet will coaplete the pro,act. Mr. ~e agreed with Co--Isotoner Vol~ regarding the property ~1~ exempt from taxation once the rezoning 10 granted because Jo I church. Mr. Lee ~Jnted out that thio would ~ true whether it c~rch. In ree~ to Mr. ~e, P]~r Saadeh stated that If the property il z~d pr~imio~l use then the church would have to be built first Page 6 September 25, 1990 mad ~t the accessory structurss. Hr. Lee pointed out that this ia the problsm, the congregation does not have the money at this time to bsalld the church, knit It does have the ~oney for an office and parish hall. Planner ~lno noted that th~ Ic~rd ~rrlll dr~ft proxies that the church~s ~ ~ll~ed ~s coodltlonal use~ subject to ~peciflc criteria. Be Ism~msed thit In the future there Is a ~slblllty of ~hat Is called ~ pr~imlo~l use t~ay ~ill ~ called a conditlonil use. He explai~d that the conditional umem only have to meet the conditions precedent to ~ all--ed. Planner Nino ~inted out that In other Of the c~nt~ It is ve~ c~n to treat churches as conditional uses as long as they meet the s~clflc criteria, and basically the planning c~nlty is say$~ t~t ~ church Is coepatlble ~lth a residential envlron~nt. Ne added that this change froe a provisional use to a cofldltlo~l use ~i]l ~ the subject of an extensive c~amunlty debate. ~rlstop~r Ssith, pro~rty ~er to the north ~lthln the planned C~lty center, e~plai~d that his ~lnt of discussion Is regarding t~ ~nln9 Ordinance, ~ection 8.11, which la the separation o~ c~rc~m' pro~rty ll~ o[ ~O0 fee~ froe ad}oinlng prol~erty ~ere the pro~rty le used for comrclal u~e in th~ consusptlon of alc~l. He stated ~ that a church is being built next to his pro- ~rty within the co--unity center, he ~111 h~ve to request a ~alver this ~00 [met. Nr. ~mlth re~rked that the 500 toot separation should ~t ~ the ~rden of the pro~rty ~er already ~nlng land ~lthln the comity center. Ne ~ted t~t churches are requested to only notify pro~rty ~ers ~lthln 300 feet of their proposed location, however, t~ affect pro~rty ~ithin ~00 feet and there could be lando~ers within t~ co~nity center that have ~t ~en notified. OE a conEJict in ~t is t~S~ to ~ accomplished ~Ith a community c~ter ~ locmtI~ ~ church ~xt to it. ~nd questioned If the ~tl- t$o~r ~ld ~ree that there ~uld ~ no objection if there was c~e in the ordi~nce or m r~est for a variance from that ordt- Page 7 September 25, 2990 t~mce p~ruittlmg the eels of alcoholic beverages on premises in the activity center within 500 feet of the church. Mr. Lee stated that the church would have no objection to this request ae long as there tea 51~ food serving limit. Assistant County Attorney Stldent suggested that the method to use ]n ap~roaching this ~atter ia to have the p~ovJao ~n the P~D refer~clng Section 8.11 ao ~y ~ a~nded. She indicated concern r~ardl~ delegation of authority. C~iooloner Saufldero comflted that he believe~ it Is a Florida State l~, regarding ie~nce of ]lcen~e~ for alcoholic consunption on praises, that 51~ of sales In a restaurant must be food. He added t~t t~ state.et which could ~ used for waiver la that aa long t~ facility Jo in compliance with orate law as it relates to sale of aico~lJc ~ve~ages on preeJeee, then t~ church would not object. Hr. ~e advised t~t In Section ~.11 of the Zoning Ordinance there J~ a c~ition ~ich l~lcatee the require~nt of 51~ sale of food Hr. S~eh $nfor~d t~t t~ pro~rty ~er ~lthln 500 feet of the church pro~rty line ~et still co~ ~fore the ~rd of County C~JemJ~re for ~alver of alco~l consumption on premises whether t~ church ~gree~ o~ Co, laminar Vol~ ~$nted out that there im no Indication of ~ceea to the pro~rty either free AJr~rt Need or Eeer~ld L~ke~ ~eetJo~d ~hat dedication of right-of-way there ia for Atr~rt Road if thlm it the accsec ~Jnt? Pier S~h stated t~t there ia access to the nursery from AJ~rt I~d; ~ver, the TranoHrtatJon ~pertnent and Kngineertng ~rt~t ~ve asked tho ~tJtio~r to gain acceom through b ~J~ard. He re~rted t~t the ~tittoner Mil[ try end accom- ~to uith accema thr~gh ~Faid ~kea Blvd.; ~t it they cannot, Staff ~il1 all~ access fr~ Air~rt Road. He explained that Emerald m ooo,,., t4 Page September 25, I990 th~ m~n~rs. Hr. Archibald. Transportation Services Adnlnlstrator. explained that the conditions In the PUO address the questions raised, and from · practical aspect the only access to both north and south Airport Ro~d ia for the petitioner to obtain permission to use Emerald Lakes Boulevard. He mdvised that if the petitioner is unable to obtain this p~rmlssion then the only access which will be permitted by the ?ranaportation Depart~nt to Airport Road will be a right turn in and a right turn out from the property. He reported that this ts the best stipulation Which c·n be recoms~ended for the PUD without going Into a three p~rty sgreem~nt bet~en the two private property owners and the Coon t y. In regards to right-of-way, Hr. Archlb·ld stated that If the peti- tioner Is required to provide a turn lane on Atrport Road, the Tr&naportatlon Dep&rt·ent would expect the· to s provide compensating right-of-way. Hr. Archibald pointed out that at the site development planning st·ge the Issue of sld~t~&Ik~ along Airport Ro&d will have to be ~dres~ed. Ne ~dvlsed that presently the sidewalks are along Airport JtO·d on the b~ck side of the drain·ge swales; and when tha sits plan is presented, th~ Transportation Depart~nt will work with the peti- tioner to try end relocate the sidewalk to a higher and drier loca- tion. ~e added that this is thm only other right-of-w&y requirement tJ~t the County plans on placing on the PUO. Com~lssloner Volpe r·lsed the question regarding acquiring right- Of-~&y for the six-lining of Airport Ro&d In this section. lrchib&ld reported that the future slx-lanlng Is planned to be COnStructed in the m~dian, but right-of-way for the t~lrn lane will still be required for developm~nt along this s~ctlon. ~lslos~ ~tnlght ~oved, ~¢onded by Commissioner Sl~r~h~n ~nd c~t~ried ~m~ml~os~slT0 tbat th~ public h~lng ba closed. Cen~l·~ioe~r Ooodnigl~t ~oved, Nconded ~ C~lmmi~r 'aiL September 2~, 1990 bell be adopted and entered into Ordinance look No. ¢0, subject to CCl~C'I recommendations and the underetandlng that the Church has no objection to alcohol being served on the adjacent premises providing th~ f~illt¥ Is in co--pit.nee with the Ylorld~ State l~ ~d Collier 90-72 Al ORDINANCE ANENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COI.LIER COUNTY, YI,ORIDA, BY A~ENDIWO THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS HAP NUMBER 49-25-1, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERS( lrROM A-2 TO "PUD' PLANNED UNIT D~VE[.OPMENT ~NO~ AS TH~ ORE~ OR~O~X CHURCH OF NAPLES FOR CHURCH AND RELATED USRS AT SO~ST CORNER OF AIR~RT ROAD (CR-31) AND EMERALD LAKES BLVD., ~A~D IN SECTION 2, T~SHIP 49 SOU~. RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUP, ~RIDA. CONSISTING OF 5.1 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN ~I~ DATE. Zt,mm 4~12 OJ~)XIAIICI 9G-73, RI PZTXTXOM R-90-17, ROBI3tT D~AJE 0F HOLE, I4OWTES JMrD AJSOCXATES, XMC., RK]fRtSI31TXMG 3011M J. WEYXWS, AS BISHOP OF THE DXOC"~::~ O~' V~IEIC~, A COR:IIN:iI~.A1~O'JI' IOI~, It~.Q~TIIG A REZOne I~ROI"I A-2 TO "lqTD", ~ 01IT DEV]/,O~, 1'O I~ IC~(:~M AS ST. $0111~ :~'V,UKi~:LZI? CATIOLIC ClIUItC1 LOC&I'~D ~ OF VARI:rERBILT HE&Cql DRIVE - Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on September 6, lgso, am evidenced try Affidavit of Publication riled with tl~e Clerk, public hearing ~ma op~ned to consider P-tltion R-90-17, flied by Robert Dumne of Role ~ntem m~ Associate,, Inc., repre- ~nt{~ John J. M~lnm, mm Bleep of the Diocese ~rat{~ Joia, re~mtl~ m r~onm fr~ A-2 to 'PUD' Planned Unit ~mlo~nt, to ~ k~ mm St. John thm ~vmn9mlist C~tholic Church, for t~ pro~rty located off 111 Avenue Worth. mpproxlm~tely 1,300 feet mmmt of V~erbtlt ~mch Drive. ~nd 3.500 feet wes~ of U.S. 41 (Tul~i Trmll North), In Section 21, T~shlp 48 South, Range 25 Pl~r $u~h state t~t the ~tltloner 1~ pro,ming to rezone a l~ ~ ~rem ~rcml to m church ~D to mll~ th~ construction of a 1,OO0 ~mt c~rch, m ~rimh ~11, m~ m rectory. He tndicmted that the sub- ~ect pro~rty Is ~rrently zo~d A-2 ~nd 1~ undeveloped; to the ~rth t~rm Am vacant A-2 ]m~ m~ V~nderbllt Vlllmm ~D; to the east iS Mmplmm Pmrk [l~ntm~ 9c~1 ~ vmcmnt A-2 l~nd; i Page lO September 25. 1990 Illth Avenue Worth arid multi-family residential (RHF-6); and to the ~at la ~aplae Memorial Oardena Cemetery. Planner Sa·deb affirmed that several County agencies have reviewed this petition and their concerns and stl~lations have been lncor- porat·d into the PUD document. Mr. la·deb advised that no correspondence ha· been r·celved for or agalrmt the petition. He added that the CCPC reviewed this petition oll lept·mber 6, 1990 and un&nimoualy (6/0} recommended approval, sub- Ject to stipulations of the reviewing Staff. John L~e of Role Monte· and Associates, Inc., representing Diocese of Venice, St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church, reported that the subject petition ia · 15 acre ·Its, adjacent to a ce·et·fy and Naples Park Zlementar-y School. Ha related that four and a half acres are set Iltde aa a xeric oak pre·er'vs. Nr. Lea advised that the School Board has been contacted regarding possible access into Naples Park Elementary School to alleviate some of th~ probleu t~t they ate h~vJng mt their exit from Hsple~ Park oflto Illth Avenue. He tr, formed that Transportation ~taff ha~ asked tKIt thi· project's entrance bi aligned with 6th 9treat if possible. Mr. L~e aumrized that this project is a definite community bene- fit with the acre· be lng preaar've, & dedication of sixty feet mt r~ght-of-way along Illth Avenue, and alleviating an existing problem th~ Icbool Board $· hmving with traffic. In response to Co·missioner Volpe questioning the provision for gopl~lr tortoises, Mr. Lee related that the tortoises will be relocated on alta. Commissioner Volpe que·t~ofled If there ts going to be a problem ~lth plved pmrklng? ~r. Lee explained that according to the zoning ordinance which this PUD 1· also subject to, the petitioner I· required to h~ve 30~ of the Perking area paved ~hlch Is pl&nnad. Comm~HlOOer Volpe mo~od. ~oconded by Gommioaloner Zl~m~h~n and c~rT~od ~nm~lmou~ly, tKut the public bearing bi clomed. Comm~oelur Shan~hmn move4, oeconded by Commissioner ~oodnight Page Septembor 2f5, 1990 mud carried unanimously, that tho OFdinamco 80 number &nd titled be Jew bo od~ptod0 ~bJect to &11 condltloEm being Incorporated into the PUD doc~z~gnt &ud entered into Ordinance Book Rs. 40: ORD XILM~CE 00-73 AN ORDINANCE AJqENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIV~ ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COI.LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-25-5, B~ CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A-2 TO 'PUD° PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS ST. JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHURCH, LOCATED ON IllTH AVENUE, WEST OF U.So 41 AND EAST OF VARDERBILT DRIVE IN SECTION 21, Tov~qsHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONS[STING OF 14.8 ~ ACR[S: AJ~D BY PROVIDINO AN EFJ~KCTIVE DATE. Item ~Cl ~01l ~O-4~O, It~ PETZTZOII AV-89--030o TAYT, OR-MCVAY, IRC. AS ~ IK)Crzzz'B, liIC., I~lig VA~ATZOM Of A ~TZOM Or ~ 10' ~gel noticq having ~en ~bliohed In the Naples Daily News on · eptes~r 9, 1990, *s evidenced ~ Affidavit of Nbiicatlon ~iled ~lth the Clerk, ~bllc ~aring uae o~ned to con~id~r Petition AV-89-030, filed ~ Tmylor-NcVoy, Inc. ~ agent for Scott~'e Inc. requeotlng eo~flt uflp]etted, located in Section 12, T~Ip 50 South, Range ~t ~o recorded in the OfrJclel Records ~ok 893 off p~geo 519 thr~gh 521 m~ Ofriclol Roco~do ~k 930 off pages 1992 end 1993 tb~ ~blJc Records or CollJer County, C~flty Attorney Cuyler edviled t~t the Ao~iatar~t County ~geoted t~t the ~4rd of County Co~iqelon~rq listen to the tJonero a~ t~n decide on Mhether or fist to continue thio Item. ~Jey O~lette of C~ingo and ~ckM~d, repreoenttng Scotty*s, Itet~ t~t thio 18 i straight fo~ard ~titlon ~lth recommefldatJon8 from t~ ~flty Staff for a~r~al. He added that thio item me~ely r~mt8 ~ v~8tlon or m water utility ilne eaoement, and the tht ~c~tm t~ ~ ll~o ~ the ~ Mr. Ooodlatte &dvioed that J~o met with the County Attorney and me--fa of the ~nty Mmr~m~ere" Office on Beptember 24, ~gO, Page 12 September 25, 1990 reg&rding soa~ ismuee th&t h&ve arisen with respect to the issuance o~ & Certificate of Occupancy on t~e ne.~ construction that has recently taken place at gcotty's. He related that &Il the new congtruction work was done pursuant to a site development plan, SDP-89-172, which ~s issued in ~cea~r, ~989, and construction commenced pursuant to a ~]Idi~ Permit numar 90-727 which was issued In February, 1990. Assistant C~nty ~nager NcLemore reported that there is an issue of die~te regarding thJm Item Involving a rezone of this property. C~nty Attorney Cuy%er clarified that tht~ dispute ts one of ZonJ~ interpretation on the pro~rty and whether or not a certain ~rt$~ of the pro~rty can ~ uae for mtorage ~r~ses. He added tbt ~taff'e concern $m t~t the ~ard of County Commissioners does ~ unk~ingly grant develo~nt approvals. CmJmmioner Vo]~ ~eetioned If the Board of County CoulssJoners treated this ~titJon aea r~tJne ~tter, could this decl~ton any tjx $n th~ future ~ to the detriment of the co=~untty aa Jt relates to proof uae of thp pro~rty? C~ty Attorn~ Cuy]er stated that the ie~u~ today tm not directly ~elated to the Issue queetio~d, ~t ther~ S~ concern that the Board Of C~nty Co~lmelone~m gm. Felly accept n p~tltion fo~ development a~r~.l and vacation of eaee~nt ~n there 1~ a disarm aa to the ~e of pro~rty ~1~. He stated that he feels this la a &attar of lngomtJon and ~tice ~re t~n anything ela~. Trane~rtatlon Se~icee Administrator Archibald stated that thJe ~tJtion ia for conei~ration of a vacation for a utility ess&sent ]~ated in Section 12, T~ahJp 50 South, Range 25 East. He added t~t the J~atJon of the ea~nt to ~ vacated ia on property owned ~ kotty'e u~r t~ existing ~J]dJnga recently built. He advised t~t t~ ~titionet ~e rerouted ~th the water and s~er utility t~t t~ letters of no ob~ection from the Utility Department and the ~ty ~e ~en eu~Jtted ~ Scotty'e. He ]nfor~d that Scotty~e has ~ a cmtt~nt to Collier C~nty to provide a drainage eaee~nt Psge 13 September 25. ]990 ,:.,*::teltlch wi]! &llow for drainage froa the future project along Davis Hr. Archibald concluded that $cotty's has met not only the minimum rl<Iuire~ent for the vacation but also has made commitments beyond ~hat la necessary which wlI! be to the benefit of Collier County in their future transportation problems. Mr. Archibald tel&ted that a resolution has been prepared and approved by the County Attornayes Office. Ne added that Staff recom- ~de that the resolution to vacate be agproved with stipulations. He pointed out that one stipulation Is that the Item on todayfs consent ag~da regarding the acceptance of the utility easement and the accep- tmlcs of the -&tar and se~r system as reconstructed be approved by t~ Board. Ne comntsd that the second stipulation Is that the docu- ~nt transferring the drainage easement from the developer to Collier ¢o~1t¥ also be approved by t~ County Attorney's Office prior to the resolution being recorded. Mr. Archibald ~mmarizsd that Staff recommend, that the resolution be approved ~ith the above collditlons or continue the Public Eesrin9. Mr. Goo~letts urged the Board not to continue this item, and informed that the issue which ie p~ndlng has no relationship to this petition. Cos~alssiomer Ihanahan q~sstion~ if the petitioner Is amenable to tM stipulations as presented to -hich Hr. Ooodlette responded they are In agree~nt completely. County Attornary Cuyler reiterated for clarification the reasoning for Stsf~ requesting a continuance of thee lies la ~hat It Is the con- Clpt o~ continuing approval if there is a dispute pending; however, this being an unrelated ~tter, it Is up to the discretion of the I~lr~ on wh~th~r or n~t they wish to do Commissioner Iaund~rs askmt Mr. Ooodletts if he agrees that the approval o~ thio petition would in no way result tn vesting of any rights regarding the zoning issue. Hr. Good lairs agreed with this. Co. missioner Saun4~rs q~eltionad if the petition Is approved with September 25. ]990 Itii~ul&tione end the diecuslion which hes taken place, would thin any way effect negatively the &rgue~nts that Staff and the County &ttorne~/ has regarding the zoning Issue. County Attorney Cuyler counted that the approval of this pett- ti~ ~m not ap~ar to have any co~ection to the zoning issue, and /tired t~t hll prlM~ conce~ S~ that the ~ard understand it would ~i~ · decillon on an itel where there 1~ some controversy. Mr. ~yler ~ed that since Nr. ~lette ~s indicated for th~ record t~t thlre is no connection ~t~en these two Items and Is not claiming any additional right~ ~ ~ result o~ thi~ approval, he has no obJectl~ with the ~ard pr~eeding ~$th ~tition AV-89-030. ~~ 4/0. ~t ~ ~11= ~l~ ~ C1~ (Cmlmml~er ~lght ~JtJn AV-IN~, t~ ~J~ ~luti~ ~-460, nbJect to ~l~l~. Page September 25, 1990 emcee itm~mme 10s20 A.N. - Itmcorrvm~ted los30 A.M. mt time Del~mt~ Clerk Om~in r~placed ~ty Clerk Arrlghi Xt~ ~ ~ ~ ~A~ ~ ~ C~ O~ M~ OR ~~ FX~ Jay Reard~, g~rgency Services Administrator, reported that ~i~ the last year, the l~kalee area lost the capability of access to ~-de~ health cmre In m clinic letting. He said In June of this Tear, at the direction of the ~ard, Start put tn place a clinic in c~ratl~ ~lth Collier Health $e~ices Industries (CHSI), Yellow Cab for a m~ttle service and Naples Com~nlty Hospital for medical capa- bilities of staff. Ne rec~ed existing this program through · 1. Nm added t~ shuttle service will ~ reduced to a demand level of me.ice for 90 ~ys with Yell~ Cmb or another provider should Yellow Cmb ~t wish to II~ mn mgree~nt to that effect. He indicated during t~t tiN, the contract for Ihuttle se~lce will be put out to bid. ll~lly, ~ r~ested fu~l~ for t~ C~nty's share o~ the cost m~r~lMtely 8259,682. ~lmiloner Shm~n re~ Into the record ~ l~tter from Father ~rlel Sullivan of the San ~rco Cit~llc Church, H~ thanked Father hlllve and the R~ere~ Ted Kleem for their fund-raising efforts ~ich c~tri~ted nearly ~27,000 for the lm~kalem ~dicml Care Trust C~illionmr ~night Mntionmd mom will ~ ~etlng next week with representatives of Maples Co--unity Hospital regarding the possi- bility of a 24 ~ur eMrgen~ facility In the luokalee area. In a~r to C~lsilo~r Vol~, Mr. Remrdon explained that the ~ty ~ t~ ~lldl~ ~lng utilized for the clinic and leases to ~Sl for ~1.00 ~r yaar. Ne stated CHSI will ~ ~rchmmlng m ~du- lu ~ fKllity to ~ plK~ ~hl~ the ~lldlng to iccosmodate t~lr mimer ~wre dimplmc~ ~en the /Mrgency Mdicml on-de.nd Itaff ~ed In from Naples Co~nity Hompitml. The comt for thim fKility, ~ said, is 918,000 ~lch will ~ used as a contrl~tion Psgs 16 toward the %~k&]ee F~dica% Allimtance Program. C~lelioner Vo]pe comnted the eomt mJgnJf$cant part of the Colznty'a port$on Sm Jn professional fees. He a~k~d what is being done tO mmaxJa]ze Medicaid relabursement for the se~cee ~ing provided? Mr. ~eardon rem~nded that mtaff from Na~]e~ CommunSty Hospital effort to find ~ form of relm~r.e~nt to put back into the ~r~. C~l~ioner Vol~ ~eltJo~d ~f repreeentatlve~ of the agri- ~lturel ~ citrus indu.triee have ~en approach.d for contributions? Nr. ~eard~ replied on-go$~ conversations are taking place with repre.~tativee of the agricultural ~nduetry a~ well as other business Ill--rite of the co~nJty. Ne Itated they are still suffering the Ifflctl Of the ~cem~r freeze and are ex~riencing many business ~robll~. ~e sa$d during the last disc.sslon he was Involved In. they J~Jcated t~ mrs wa$tJng for the$r next harvest. Me re.fred at t~t tl~ th~ ~lll ~ve a ~tter ~]e on their economic statu~. Ne I~Jeed t~ agricultural l~uetry $e ve~ sup~rtlve of the efforts ~ing ~e with the l~kalee ~dical Amliltanc. Program, but their ~r~t c~h fl~ di~mll~ t~m to ~co~ involved. W~lrl~ ~]e~, p~tor of ~rco Lutheran Church ~nd m member oi t~ F~i~m of C~W~, ~tmt~d ~ ~ ~n ~rkino closely with repre~en- tmtive~ on ~rco ]~1~ w~ ~v~ given ~n enthu~lm~tic r~lponae to ~n th~ ~blic mhd privmte .ectorl which ~y be a ~del ior the ~lt of the count~ in re~n~e to President Buah'a 'thousand polnt~ of light" He mtmted he {~ ve~ ~]em~ed with the re=~nse, and the ~{~ ~i~ ~e to enlu=l m lucce~.ful program. He concluded by t~{~ ~11 t~ w~ hmv~ ~rked t~e~h~r to re.olve m ~roblem thmt ~{~t~ In ~{lier C~nty. C~{~{~= ~m~m co~d Coll.=loner Ooodnight for her ~li~t~ ~ · r~pre~ent~tiv~ of the ~rd to ~r~ona11~ talk to ~m- September' 25, 1990 t~tl of th~ farming co~mvnlty to encourage their support. Commissioner Good~ight communicated the agricultural community has lr~dlcated their Interest and have co~lt~ed themselves to supporting this pr~ram am s~ as Jm eco~lcally ~smJble. ~rla ~r~ez, C~ir~rmon of CURE's e~rgency ~dlcal 9ervXce9 l~ka]ee, t~ked t~ ~ard ~ C~nty Staff for their sup~rc fu~i~ of the Mdical e~rgency r~m. Sh~ al~o thanked the Reverend Flees a~ Father Sullivan for their fund-raising efforts. ~rge ~ller, President of Collier County Civic Federation, nggelted that all ~tiente receiving care thr~gh the Iaaokalee ~dJcal Assistance Pr~raa e~uld ~ a~essed a fee for those vJcmm. ~r. Rmardon explained t~t all ~tlentn are screened for their ability to ~y. He said fe~m arm ~mmd on a sliding ~caIe m~stem, and tM mtte~t is ~1~ ~e to collect mm ~ch mm can b. afforded tM. ~tients. Mr. Remrdon rem~md the clinic la o~n Hond~y through Friday. Nm meld mince It lm c]om~d on ~eke~m, back-up tren~po~tation ta Ifil{ ~d to brl~ ~tlmntm from I~km]em to Worth Collier ~p{tll or Map]el Co~nity Holpittl. Also, he said, doctorl at the c]Jnlc ~e identified patients who they cannot treat and re]emma t~ir facility with tim current capabilities. He indicated it would ~ comt prohibitive to bring in additional test equipment, etc., in or~r to treat and release t~me ~tients. He re~rted these ~ ~t ~d mn mm~lmnce. ~lch il ve~ comtly, ~t do need m mhuttle to tra~rt t~a into lmpl/m for treatment. He added the J~J{ ll2,000 in t~ul coati for on-de.nd mhutt]m service. He Mid it .al pr--t~mly mc~ul~ twice ~r ~y, 365 days ~r year at IF. JMteJ1 160,000 ~u{ly, ~ mx~r~mncm ham mh~ t~t type ~ice tm ~t ~ed~. Page September 25, 1990 Commissioner Ooodnight advised the poesiblllty has been dlecuosed Of bril~ging in Mdicel students from the University of South Florida arid · m~dlc&l mchool in Dade County to offset some of the costs of this pro, fas arid afford studente the ability to work in an emergency ro<~ setting. John ~ltchger. Director of O=·dalup~ Social Services in Immokalee. ~xt~d~d an lnvltmtion to the Couleeloner~ and to Mr. Keller to visit X~l~liee to b~tter understand the reality of what is dealt with on a d~¥-to-day b&sis. He indicated he is looking forward to support from t~t ~<3~rd for this program. Ne edded that Naples Community Hospital is 13~ginning to work on a long-range plan for the medically needy in X~kalee. Co~missioner Volpe .ggeete~ t~t th~. pr~ram mAgh~ ~ ~or ~rt ~r~ the ~n~ted ~ay, ~ t~ eource of revenue *hou]d be J~t]gated. ~rJotte ~st~n Indicated her su~rt for the efforts being made ~ the ~ard for ~dlcal care in ]m~kalee. Fred ~o~, thanked the ~ard for its leadership In this ar~a. and t~ C~ for brlngl~ this l~ue to the ~ard In 4 way that h~ d~e]o~d co~nlty spirit for the health care concerns In · l ~d he has utilized the ~ervlce~ n~ provided tn ]mmokalee and ~y~ full price for them. Nr. ~ar~n ~ntJ~d that Item 3 on the executive su~ry recom- ~ exte~i~ the ~huttl~ ~ervice contract ~lth Yell~ Cab. u~ t~ ~ard to ~ t~t Item to authorize ~:aff to secure ~t~r firm. If ~cessary. and bid out as quickly as possible. ~]al~d t~t fl~l confir~tlon has not ~en obtained from Yello~ ~b. ~ ~tated from a negotiation stand, iht as ~ell as the ability to ~i~tain the se~tce, that additional lan~a~e is needed. M ~1M ~1~17, to a~e Stiff'e r~oWtl~ to ~ ~1~1 ~eist~e ~u~ ~t~ t~ ~mt ~lth ~ ~t ~ ClloAc f~ ~ ~lr; ~tlate with Yell~ Cab P~e 10 S~tnb~r 2~, 1990 ~l~ ~ly, to ~t ~/~i~r ~Aght to r~re~t ~ ~ o~ ~ ~lmmlm 1~ efforts to ra/~ ~Ati~l CmJsslo~r ~nlght t~ked the memberm of CURE for their ~rt. Co~lselo~r Smu~ers comnted t~t, during a ve~ tlght ~dget ~lr~ It l~ re~rk~ble t~t Cml,mioner ~ntght has ~en able ~t tbls ~t of fu~l~ fr~ t~ ~rd. ~isslo~r Vol~ ~k~l~ed Dr. Ro~rt ToUr who has e~r~ this pr~r~m fr~ t~ p~elcJan'e ~rs~ctlve. ~J~.lo~r ~night ~re~, ~l~ t~t ~ithout Dr. ~vJce, ~ c~ld ~t ~e ~ t~ Job she h~z done. ~pt~mb~r 25, 1990 ~gal notice ~vlng ~en ~bllshed In the Naples Daily News on · ~ptem~r 9, 1990, and Septem~r 16, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit Of ~bllcatlon filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to con- sider a re~lutlon pr~ld]~ for an increase in ~rmit and Inspection fe~ for: a) Collier C~nty Electrical C~e; b) Collier County Pl~bl~ Code; c) Collier C~nty ~chanlcal Code: d) Collier County · t~rd Building C~e; e) Collier C~nty Fire Protection Code; Collier C~nty Gas C~e; g) Collier C~nty S~i=~lng Pool Code. Fr~ B~tt, C~nity ~elo~nt ~lces Adslnlstrator, ~111~ tN reviled fei lC~lt ~l ~en revl~ed and accepted t~ Collier County Builders m~ Contractors' A~ocl~tlon ~nd members of the const~ctlon industry. Ne stmted the pro~sed changes ~c~ed to bring Collier County'~ ~lldlng permit fees into con- for~ce ~lth nmtionml Bill Jones, representing Collier C~nty Builders mhd Contrmctors ~IM ~iNIT, to ~IM t~ ~lic M ~Jg ~l=ly, to ~t ~lutl~ ~461 regardl~ Page 21 September 25, 1990 AID I::IOOT, A~OII I:1 ~1 ~ Kilo DAY - [~O Ochs, Admlnlmtratlve iervlce~ Administrator, reported thl~ itm was before the Board two ~eks ago for the purpose of revising Personnel Rules and Regulations to add a twelfth paid holiday, Martin L~ther King Day. Ne said stsff recoa~ended eliminating one of the two currently provided Personal [~eeve days to offset the additional paid holiday. At that ti~e, he said, the Board asked for supplemental Information Which h~s ~ been prc~vided. In sns~ver to Com~issioner Volp~, Hr. Ochs replied that during the r~xt calendar ye&r, the county-wide fiscal l=pact in holiday pay and ov~rtlN will be spproxim~&tsly $113,000, the bulk of which will be within th~ Sheriff's Office. C~$mmlo~r Vol~ suggested ~rsulng r~a~onabl~ alternatives ~re t~re ~111 ~ ~ net Increase in cost to County govern=ent. Co~$ssio~r ~night ~ntio~d the ~terlal provided considers t~ ~sslblllty of deleting ~ Frl~y to add ~artln Luther King Day. ~ re~rt~ In co~r$~ to ot~r count l~s, only one observes Good ~rl~ *~ only for ~-~lf C~$ssio~r ~~n ~reed t~t ~y ~ ~n excellent ~$ch ~S11 hav~ no fiscal $m~ct. ~$msio~r ~amme i~$cated ~ ~lll not support deleting ~ristl~n ~liday, ~t ~y con~ider · provlslon, l holiday. ~lmsioner Vol~ amk~ for ~n explanation of the two current fl~ti~ Nr, ~ replied t~t t~re are act~lly eleven paid holidays that · re ~ll =lti~tely f$=~. Ne said nine are fixed as part of the sche- ~le i~ t~ Per~l ~les and annually, the ~ard fixes t~ other ~li~ys, He stated Christ--s Ire ~ President's Day have ti~lly ~n given ~ the t~ wn-fixed holidays, ~$smi~r Vol~ ~gested ~d$~ ~rtln Luther King Day to the ~ ~-fi~ ~lt~s ~$th t~ ~ard fixing t~ of the three ~lldays September 25, 1990 Luther King D~ end Preold~t'o Day, and the next year, ~t ~y be ~]J~y oc~dule Mill reuifl at eleven paid holidays per Comioolone~ S~undeFo co~fliceted h~ ~ld prefer to ~rJotMo Eve, r~ther t~fl ~ Friday. He ~t~ted ~p]oyffeo ~ho may ~t to, CeA use ~ Per,nmi ~eve dey or a vacation day for C~rlotmao Mr. Oc~ re~rted the ~rrent ~licieo limit P~roo~l leave days for ~oin~oo reecho t~t r~lre .n employee to ~ ~t of the office ~rl~ · re~lsrly scheduled ~rk day. Cmio~ioner Sau~ero ~gge~ted ~o ~rt of e~tablls~lng Lurer King D8y, aMndlflg the Personnel Rules to ~llow employees to use a Pero~l ~ave dmy on Chrlot~o Eve. Conlooloner Vol~ otmted 8~ther elternmtlvff Mould be to add to u~ 8 Pe~3 ~eve day off the ye~F It Jo not ochedu]ed as m fixed ~ll~y ~ t~ ~eFd. In I~r to Coulmglo~r Seuflders, Mr. Ochm said of the 16 coufl- tJoo ~ed, the t~ leeot o~e~ed ~lldmyo MeFe Oo~ lFldiy e~d ~JOoJO~r S~~ oaked w~t Jo the reco~efldation of ~l~ ~vi~ry ~lttee? Mr. Oc~ orated t~y e~or~ t~ original staff ~econendattofl to ~ a t~eJfth ~liday, fixing ~rtin Lu[her King tn exchange fo~ one ~ty Byron Tomlln~n, representing the Sheriff's Office, read a litter into t~ record. (Copy not provided to the Clerk to the ~rd.) ~e stated t~ S~riff'a Office is ~t tn op~eitJon to the ~tlblil~nt of ~rtin Luther King Day a~ an observed holiday. ~rt~ t~ cost of an a~ltlo~l ~liday to the Sheriff's ~dget, MlarJel ~ ~nefits, Je projected it $100,568. He added the ~rlff'e Office ~e ~t ~ve Per~l ~ave days. In response to a question by Cosusislioner H&sse0 Deputy Tomllnson lr~diclted t~ S~lff'~ Office ~ ellen ~id holidays. Fred Tho~s e~ke In favor of establishing Martin Luther King Day ~ In o~e~ed holiday to h~or m great leader In our history. Cl~rk Giles r~rted ~uch difficulty In documenting legitimate Per~ ~ve d~ys in exc~e for t~ ~ddltion of Mar~ln Luther ~tng ~r~ld ~Kenzl~, repre~ntlng the N~CP, stated his organization ~le~rtedly sup~rts Staff's ~eco~nd~tlon to e~tabllsh Har~ln ~utheF Ki~ D~y. He urged t~ ~rd to ~t least recommend est~blishl~ that ~olld~y, if ~thl~ else is re~olved today. Col~I ~e~, ~s~r of t~ ~ns of tbs A~ric~n Revolution, i~lc~ted his sv~rt tMt this ~ll~y ~ established on a county, · t~te s~ ~tlo~lde l~el, ~t urged the ~ard not to consider ~tl~ President's D.y a~ · ~lution. H~ added thtt was for ~ars a ~tlo~l ~llday, a~ It Is s~ t~t ~ have lost sight of our natl~l origins aM have denigrated It to such an extent that It Nr. Ochs ~se~rted that Co~lssloner 5aund~rs' proposal would t~ln the st.tus q~ ~lt~t ~ltlo~l cost to th~ County, ~hile t~ ~ tl~ ~cc~tl~ t~ ~tltloner's original request. ~lsslo~r VoI~ asked t~ ~ard to consid, r Clerk Giles' ~et In elisl~ti~ ~th Per~l ~ave days for the ~ddltional their ~r~nal ~ys. ~ Co~lssloner Saunders' proposal ~111 create t~ Ibllity for ~e~one to r~est either G~d Friday or Christ.s ~ ~ s ~er~l ~ve dmy. He stated this ~lll c~use ~ddttionll c~t to t~ C~ty. ~lssl~er ~night lu~ested that the Employee Advisory ~ltta ~ ~llcited for t~lr input. She slid she Is very lnterat~ In ~t the feell~s of espl~ees are regardl~ the options Coaaimsion~r Ssunders pro~oled fixing Martin Luther King Day and Prealdent'm D~y em holidays end asked the County Manager to survey e~l~ees to determine ~hich of either Christmas Eve or Oood Friday t~ ~ld prefer to eliminate. ~e stated that will at least establish the holiday which Is the ~r~ee of the petition. ~5~$~ ~rm ~, ~c~ed ~ C~tsei~r ~tght ~ ~l~ ~ in 3~; fh ~omi~tem ky as m ~lidmy In kll~ efter t~ ~U ~r b kte~l~d ~ n.~ of C~ty ~lm ~lch lo ~efer8ble: ~ tb Perml hies to a11~ ~ ~1~ to ~ 8 ~rml km ~ for ~lc~er of tho~ t~ ~s lo elltlMt~; ~ ~I~Hs to ~tlfy fl~l~ro at leest ~ h ~ If t~ wI~ to ~ tb ollsl~t~ ~ll~y es ~ 000 ~ Clerk ~ff~ r~l~ ~ Clerk ~ln ~t thio tim *** It~ ~12C DI~I~ ~ ~XOXOME ~1 ~ ~E ~1 FACILI~ AT ~LD[M ~vo c~c.rns ~Jth regard to t~ Pr~lllonal Use for the Moose Lodge FacllitT on ~lden 04ts ~l~ard. Ne explained that the residents reel t~t t~re Mas S~uate ~-ting of the oignage, and they were ~t ~ard 4t t~ Pliflnlflg Co~ioolon'o ~bllc ~nlty D~elop~nt Services Administrator 8rutt stated that t~ Jo~e at ~ is whether proof slg~ge bas ~s~ed on the pro- ~rty. He ~vl~ t~t he ~0 a signed, notarized statement from Jack ~h, C~e Compliance Investigator, Indicating t~t on July 13, 10~, ~ ~rg~lly ~oted the legal not Ice for a request of PF~i81~I ~. ~titlofl It t~ corner of 13th Street S.~. and Golden ~to ~l~mrd, He explai~d that t~ ~tlce Mas attached to a tel~ ~le l~at~ on t~ e~e of the right-of-way, and ~sted in a ~r ~ t~ It could ~ ~en from ~h 13th Street S.H. and Page Sept e~b~r 25, Qold~n (~te Boulevard. l~e rear,e4 t~t the not ic~ wa~ ~ted ~l~t of 4-1/2 feet a~e the gr~d and not obst~cted by ~eds and b~sh. ~t$~, mtatem that a ml~ m~ll ~ erected by the Zoning Director full vJ~ of the ~blic ~ each etreet mide of the said ~and to rez~d. C~l.~io~r Ra~.e ~tated t~t he u~erstand, tha~ ~he s~gn was f~ at the ~se of th~ telephone ~le and folded over a couple ti~. Ne ~eltloned ~ther Staff checks the signs to verify that ~ty Attor~ ~y]er ~ised t~t there ~ no legal requJrement t~t t~ C~nty go ~ck ~ Mki mute the sign 1~ In place. re~ted t~t t~ Jegal r~JreMnt Jl that the sign b~ posted. He · eMrk~ t~t la 4~ltion to the eign, there ~a~ 4 n~spaper adver- tJH~t ~lth regard to t~ Pla~Jng Co~3s. lon'N public hearing, and pro~rty ~erl ~lthin 300' ~re ~tJfl~d of the he4ring. ~. LJ~ fludmon, repre~ntJ~ t~ Z~t~t~ CltlzenE, stated that · fter ~,ri~ ~ut t~ Prov{e{o~l Uee, eh~ contacted Planning ~JCee ~M wam {nfor~d t~t t~ ~t{t{on was already approved. She ~t~ t~t e~ then called Cou~ee~oner Hamee ~nd he replied that the ree{~ntl i~u]d ~ve ~en ~t t~ ~blic he.ring to voice their objec- t,onto. S~ i~cated t~t ~he ~ent out 80 - 100 flyere to re~ident~ ~t~Jl~ t~ greatest ~unt of area a~ound the said property. She ~*~rt~ t~t ~ery ree~n~ e~ received was that no one m~w the IJ~. ~ ~~ t~t mM f~ tM lt~, folded up and thr~ tM grul ~ t~ tele~hon. ~]e. She cited that mhe doe. not feel t~t tM reeJ~nte wre notified proof]y, ~otino that one ~th~ tM ~00' area fros t~ ~ry of the pro~rty w~m notified, ~t m ~t ~re that the pro~ ]~ge ~uld ~ contracted next to Mz p~rty. S~ et~t~ t~t fire Chief Norm Hatcher d~d receive the Page 26 September 25, 1990 ~Otlce, but I~ was ready to resign and did not notify the Fire ~lmslon. C~ismionmr Vol~ related t~t It ap~ars that the Coulsslon ts ~l~ ~d to consider m ~tlon to reconsider th~ application for t~ Pr~lmlo~l Use for the ~se ~ty Attorn~ Cuyler mdvlmed t~t there Is no m~chanlsm, under t~ ~c~lder~tion Ordtnmncm to rmconsider the Provisional Uge. He ~t~ t~t if t~ Pr~lslo~l Use ~as denied, the ~titloner would t~ only ~r~n ~ c~ld brl~ it ~ck for reconsideration. In mn~er to Co~immloner Smundmrm, C~nty Attorney Cuyler stated thmt if t~lm ~m m cam~ of frmud or misrepresentation, the Board ~vm t~ In. rent ~uthority to correct the situation. ~m. Hudson ~sked if t~re Is ~ny lmgml requirement that there m~ld ~ve ~mn t~ signs, facing each street. C~nty Attorney Cuyl~r ~vlmmd tb~t tb~r~ do~s ~ot ne~d to b~ si~m, ~tl~ t~t th~ mI~ ~m need to ~ la full vi~ of · tremtm, m~ mm Hr. B~tt l~lcmt~d, there Is ~vid~ce of mn affidavit m~ m p~to t~t this lm correct. Hr, O~ge ~mller stated t~t t~ ~ticm requirement fo~ property ~rm ~tt~ln 3~* of the ~tltlonmd pro~rty lm too m~ll ~n ~rem t~ Estates. Nm l~lcmted t~t ~mt of tbs ~oplm ~ 150'*, ~emt~ t~t t~ Ordi~m ~ r~l~d to reflect that ~rm ~lthin 1,000* of m Pr~imlonml Ume ~ notified. He re~rked t~t for~l t~ mlgnm on ~rd~mrd mhould b~ pomt~d so that the~ ca~ ~ pro. fly mttmc~d. ~immionmr ~night ~ted t~t there are only two places in the ~t~tes ~re t~re uy ~ ~ pr~lmio~l use: the eubJect property, and ~t to t~ ~&L pretty. ~$mml~r Vol~ recmlled t~t 2,500 lett~rm of notlficmtlon ~ ~t ~t ~ith r~.rd to t~ m~nt to Pelican Bay PUD relating to t~ Ritz tent. He S~icat~ that there mre certain circummtances ~S~lmrly ~$th Pr~lmio~l O~m ~hen the ~rrent meth~ of notlfl- ~ti~ m~ld ~ c~. Page September 25, 1990 County Attorney Cuyler a~vlsed that this le an mpproprlate matter tO b~ discussed ms a p~rt of the [.~nd Development Regulations. Mr. Bruce Jills, resident o[ 13th Street, S.W.. stated that Provtmional Omem are to be ~orally acceptmble to the neighborhood. He ~lml~d that the ~ileltone Y~th Ho~ i~ located on the next ~treet, ~ t~re ire 27 children ~er the ~ge of 13 yemrs of age on his street t~t go t~ ~s stop. He replied that If on~ o~ these children Or ~rents are killed ~cause ~one from the Moose Lodge Is driving after drl~i~, the Co~lsslon will have a very difficult time hiding fr~ legal res~nsibllity. ~e l~lcated t~t this Is a eoral obliga- tion ~ich ~eds to ~ ~dres~d. He ~ggested that a library, ,~tltl~ or church ~ placed ~ the pro~rty rather than a neigh- ~r~~r. C~lseloner Hmsse advised that under the circumstances, the Cmlmsion enc~r~gem ~ r~uests ~blic input, but no one fros the ~igh~r~ compl~ed ~ut this Provislo~l U~. C~lssioner ~nlght stated thlt the Comsisslon h~s gone on record tl~ ~nd ti~ ~9~1n denying Provisional {lsp~, ~hlch require ~ suer ~}orlty vote. S~e ooted that this property Is ~ithln her stated t~t t~ ~l~n O~te ~ster Comlttee has ~n ~orking on this for ~re t~n t~ ye~r. ~ · ~rkshop w~s held. Hr. ~verett O~ard. Itmted that he is the Junior Past Governor of t~ ~se ~ge In ~lden G~te. *nd noted that tt~e ~oo~e Is not ~ ~Jgh~r~ b~r. He re,fred t~t there are social quarters for ~em- ~rs ~ their ~ests. He explained ~t the Hoose does ~ny things for ~ children. C~J~sio~r S~n con. fred that signage Is a problem, and Page 28 September 25, 1990 lmlatJon ~aa m~ade to this facility ~lth regard to the closing hour, ~ti~ t~t the C~lmeJ~ ~e .eU effort to ~ fair and honest in this r~ard. C~$mel~r ~night r~ind~ He. ~udson that thim is a one year ~iei~l U~ and if ~ilding ~raita are not issued ~tthtn that tls, t~ Petitioner NJ J] N ~ck ~ore the Commission to request an ~t~i~. S~ e~lained t~t the ~tition ~lll be re-heard at that ~gal notice having ~en ~blJahed in the Naples Daily News on A~t 29, 1990, am ~l~nc~ ~ Affidavit of ~blicatlon flied ~ith t~ C~erk, ~bllc ~arJ~ ~aa continued from Septembe~ 18, 1990, ~eJ~r ~n o~di~e a~j~ ~llJe~ County Ordinance 89-05, an ordJ~ce e~cti~ ~ eetablJehJ~ ~ gr~th ~ge~nt plan for ~lJJer C~nty, Flori~, ~re~nt to the local govern~nt ~re~nlive Placing and ~ ~velo~ent Regulation Act of 1985 and ~pter 9J-5, Flo~l~ ~mlnJet~ative C~e, ~lnl~um crJterla for rev1~ of J~al g~er~nt coep~e~nelve plane and determlnatlon of complian- ce; ~ cor~ectt~, u~atlng a~ ~ltying certain co~te, revenue sour- cee, eu~rtlng ~iciee and the dates of con~tructior~ of facilitiee en~rated in t~ Collier C~nty Gr~th ~anage~ent Plan capital lepro- vaunt e~e~nt fo~ capital pro~ecte in fiscal years 1990/91 through 1994/95. ~eletant C~ty ~ger ~re advl~d that co~nity planning ~ ~ official function of local G~erneent tn 1907 ~hen the City of ~rtfo~, Co~tJ~t establish, ~ Ordi~nce, t~ first e~l~J~ ~ieelon'. Be related t~t city planning promised to ~ t~ ~re-ell of ur~ ills though t~ process of comprehensive Page 29 9eptsmber 25. 1990 pi&rtnlr~, c¢~dm enforcement and tbs coordinated implementation of long rar~e Capital improvement progr~ma. Bm noted that varying forms c~lty planing ~s ~en co~n ~lace In local and 9tare govern- ~nts thr~o~t t~ count~ for ~ny years, the oreat promise ~nlty Plannl~ hs unfortu~t~ly failed to materialize. r~rt~ t~t urb~ sprawl, ur~ conoe~tlon. ~nd substandard lnfrast~ctur. ~v. ~co~ th. rul~ rather than the ~xceptlon In many [lorlh c~l~l~s is ~11 *s co~lii~s throuohout the nation. He l~lclt~ i~i sc~l.rs a~ pr*ctl~lon, rs ~ll~v~ that th~ reasons *r.: th. fallur~ of loc. 1 9~rn~nis to enforce re~lations l~l~n~ co--miry pla~; ~ ~h~ l*ck of wllllnoness on the part lx*l c~nltl~s ~o su~ri i~ fl~cln9 of Capital Improvement c~ti~s In t~ ~tat~ to submit ~ Or--th Man~o~nt Plan, · plan r~ar~ ~ ~ny prof~sslo~ls as ~ ~1 for [h~ Stat~. H~ reported t~t t~ ~rt~n~ of ~nl~y Affairs signed ogf on th~ Collier Mr. ~r~ ~xpl~i~d t~i Collier County h~s ~stabllsh~d mll~mt~s In t~ ~v~lo~nt of its Or.th hn4gement Plan, lncludln9 o~ ol t~ ~st compr~nsiv~ citizen p~rtlclpation ~I~orts In the {tit{; t~ concept o~ ~ctivlty c~nt~rs; ~nd th~ ~oon to b~ compl~ted D~lfo~ ~elo~nt C~. Hr. ~re ita~e4 t~t t~ Co. il~ion Jl being aeked ~o approve t~ .co~d u~Ce ~o ~ Capital II~rove.n~ Ele~nt of the ~lan. J~lciC~ ~t ~hil acCJon Je Icco.panled ~ a degree of public con- ce~ voiced ~ ~re of the co--unity, no~lng ~t ~he.e concern~ MI rmlted Jn ~t lc.it one local n~.~a~r challengSng C~unt~ -taff to ~blJcly ~reel ~h~ c~ncer~ voiced by ~he ~ublic and ~. ~re ~ree~d t~ ftr~t ~Jor question: II etaff t~thtul to t~ CoMJ~llon ~ the co~tty ~n aJseeelng and reco~- KI~ t~ vari~l le~lce and financial strategies that are required Page 30 September 25, 1990 to accomplish tt~e coa~unitiaa vision of the future through lnplemen- t&t~on of th~ Oral, th Iq~r~gement Plan? He ~ffir~ed that St~ff Is at a ~e to ~e~t~ ~t ~ble ~n~f~t would ~ ~eal~zed by dei~- ~c~ll~h~ t~ Co~lon~ v~lon of the future th~oug~ the e$~ of t~ Plan. He ~ted t~t the infrastructure lnfor~tlon system for~ t~ ~sis of the a~lyzed Or--th ~n~ge~nt process. He stated t~t ~c~satlons t~t staff is involved In so~e co~spiracy to ~rlt. Mr. ~re a~ls~ t~t si,fl has applied the evolving skills, t~l~les, a~ Infarction systems of Growth ~nagesent In an e~]~ ~n~r, ~co~ to ~ In t~e Stat~ of Florida. He noted t~t ~ pr*ctltlon~r. ~ll~e that l~prove~nts In the near to ~ ~ccurlte~y procelmed m~ dll~rled In seconds from 24 hour muto- ~t~ tel]arm mtrmt~icmlly ]ocmted throughout the community. Hr. ~rt called mttention to t~ lecond question: A~e the projects Jo the Capltml lmpr~e~ntm Ele=ent of the Growth Management Pl~ ~e~d? fie replied t~t the project llet tn the CIE update la a ~l~c~ pr~ru of lmpr~e~nte derived from Eevel of Service ~t~r~ eat ~ the citizens of Collier County. Ee re~rted that ~thl~ In t~ plan of Jlpr~e~nte ha~ ~er anticipated that every CJtl=en aM ev~ry eeg~nt of t~ co~ntty would ~hare with equal lnthu$~aem or tolerance the re~lato~ coat, or ~netary cost for rtallzl~ the couunlty'e vision of the future. He Indicated that this vlelon of t~ future II ~rth ~reulng and reasonable ~lll ~ r~lred frae all sector, of the couuntty to develop a set of ltrlt~el for Icco~]llhlng that ~r~se. ~e related that Staff bll~n tMt t~ pro~ects contained In the Cl~ update ia a realo- ~le ~ ~ceeea~ pr~ra~ of lmpr~emente, accomplishing the vision of tM f~ture eat ~t In the Or--th ~gement Plan for Collier ~ty. Page 31 September 25, 1990 Mr. M~L~ore ststed th&t the second question l~: Should level of ~rvlca stand&rd, be reduced? He explained that staff feels there are two conditions for lo~erlng service levels: where there Is a desire ~ t~ ~rt of the cltlze~ of the co~nJty to reduce the quality of life t~ ~111 en~ In t~lc future, or where the reduction of san- ctity de.ire to acco.pl/sh for themselv~s in the future. Hr. ~re recanted the f~rth ~or question: ~at ~11] the future o~ratJ~ cost. ~ fo~ the $314 all/ion In projects in the CIE? Be ~/~ted t~t Tmble 3, Ap~x "B", of the Second Annual CIE do]]l~l, and In ~ 96, the net o~atlng costa ~111 be approximately $3,825,OOO o~ the ~ulvmlent of m~=ox~tel~ .1994 M~. ~~e ca]].d mttentJon to question five: The County has coll.ct~ ~ mppll~ t~mrd t~ deficit In the Second Annual CIE O~te? He l~lc~ted t~t If the entire I ~ill c~pltal Revenue Fund ~s co~ltted to t~ CIE. I d. licit of *25 ~llllon would still exist In the CIE with no funds available for the ~ny non-CIE capital pro- Jects ~e~d to ~lntmln a~ ex.nd the capital f~cllltles which pro- vl~ se~lces to t~ County's citizens. He noted that roads have tr~ltl~lly ~en fu~d on tbs pre. Isa that th~ ~nefltlng users I~ld ~y the costs. He explained that the use of ad valorem taxes ~ro~ t~ I ~111 fund to conzt~ct roads would transfer part ~r~n to t~ real pro~rty ~ers of Collier County without the bene- fit of a ratlo~l ~z test. as ~uld occur If a Road Improvement Hr. ~re ~lsed that the ~cal Option Sa]~. Tax Ad-Hoc ~l~ T~, /~liz/d t~lr concern that the cost of Infrastructure ~t Or~h ~ge~nt ~n~te~ not fall solely on the shoulders t~ ~ty'l pro~rty ~rl In the forl of increased ad valorem t~l. Page 32 Septembe~ 25, ]9gO ~. Nc~mors dIsclolld th~ sixth qusstJon: Continued reference Is ~ to the 'property tu relief" that would be made possible by t~ avmllablllt¥ of the 7th Cent S~les T~x revenues to fund the CIE. Is this ~ correct mtate~nt In light of the restrictions In Chapter 212.0~t(2) [.5.? He ~ffirmed that this question Involved the legality of ca~lng the I Mill ~nd as pro~sed. He noted that the County Atto~ a~ ~ c~nsel advised that this Is In fact a legal process ~lch c~n N ~, If desirN. ~e explained that the plan aa pro- ~d, ~ld ~11~ ~ reduction In the millage to approxl~tely .3807 ~er t~ 10 year ~rl~ ~n t~ S~les T~ program Is In place, and ~ld ~ve t~ ~bllc ~85 sllllon - ~90 slllton la pro~rty taxes. ~. ~re ~ted ~estl~ seven: Since the levels of servtce for ~st f~cllltles In t~ Cig are ~sed on units per capita, the ~l~tl~ projections u~ In t~ CIE have a substantial l~pact on t~ ~ed to Nlld or ex~ facilities. ~lt Is the source of these pro~ectl~s ~ ~hy ~re t~ used? He stated that the adopted stan- ~rd ~l~tlon pro~ectlons for ~lysls of ~bllc f~cllltles requlre- ~ts ~re the ~nnual ~to~r I high r~nge ~pulatlon projections pre~r~ ~ t~ Bureau of Zco~lc ~ Business R~e~rch of the University of ~lorld~. Ne related that this st~nd~rd ~s ~dopted ~ t~ ~rd of County Co~lsslo~rs on J~nu~ry 10, 1989 ~s recouended ~ t~ P~l~tlon Sukomlttee of t~ CC~ Citizens idvlso~ Mr. ~re announced question eight: H~ do level o~ service et~rda keep c~I~? He explal~d that the Annual Update of the CI[ la t~ ~c~lsa to ~nItor the plan to ~ke an annual reality c~ck ~ to ~e ~JuetMni aa ne~ed. He noted that stair does not ~tly t~l t~re is t~ ne~ to l~r se~ice levels. Mr. ~re disclosed question nine: ~y has the total coat ot t~ ~o~ect in t~ CIE increased froa ~234 Ill]lon In the original to ~314 elJllon in the pro~d ~cond CIE U~ate? He replied that this il t~ ~tt~ 11~ ~estlon, ~ting t~t with the exception of County ~ State ro~ projects, there ~l ~en ~ change In the overall cost Page 33 September 25, lggO Of th~ CI~. He reported that non-road proJect~ totaled $167 million In th~ orlgir~l CII and $165 million In the proposed Second CIE Opd&ts. He reurked that the costs for roads have Increased for a variety of re~ons. Re cited t~t available road revenues have been l~fflclsnt to c~er project c~tm, there[ore, const~ctlon of ~o~tm ~ to ~ ~erre~ l~to t~ meco~ ~ year ~rtlon o~ the 10 yl~r r~ gr~r~s. He mtltg t~t the prolects In the 10 year road pr~a ~vl reul~ relatively mtabll. He explained that ~roJects pr~l~mly mchaled [or c~st~ctlon have ~coee backlogQed ~nd had to ~ carried fox. rd due to the lack of funding. ~=lmmlo~r Vol~ asked if similar Increases can be anticipated with each mesl-~nnual u~ate of the CI[. Mr. McLesore stated that he ~li~es tMt this uy ~ ~ntlclptted until monies are available so t~t thom~ proJ.cts c~n ~ constructed, and the 5 yeor plan will Tran~rt;tlon {e.lc~m Administrator Archibald stated that not ~lv ~ this pr~ram enco=~ss t~ m~rtfall that has ~en mlo~ got yearm ~ Is In ;xlstinQ deficiency, but It Is Important to rec~lze the p~me of guture pro~e¢ts and thm costs which will be ~h ~re. Be rec~lled t~t In ku~st, he c~se ~fore the to r~st gi~nci~ for th~ desl~ of up to 32 .Jor proJectm. He ~t~ t~t ~ ll~ of credit w~s obtllned ~or the design contracts, ~tlN t~t t~ ~lld$~ cycl~ Is still ~ numar of years away. He called sttentl~ to I dlmplayed exhibit outlining ~ typical road pro- ~t kplctl~ tim versus &liars. He affirmed that the design phase repre.ntm a~roxiutely 10~ of the construction costs and this phase ~ld t~ as 1o~ as lO yelrs for ~rsittlnO. He explained tMt the r~ ~tre~ will always ~ f~irly level, and the dollars can be g{litld to tlk~ th; projects under construction. He stated that t~ CI[ ~ ~en ~ u~n design ~d right-of-way ~rk. He noted · ll t~ construction &ll~rs ir~ being m~nt during the 5 year road pr~, ~ t~t S~ ~rt of t~ay's di]esu. In ~r to Coalmsioner Vol~, Mr. Archibald explained that the PaQ~ 34 geptember 25, 1990 tnlatmt of projects In the lO year program h&ve not real]¥ changed to ~n~ dr~tic amount, but the coat of those projects over the 10 year tim fr~m~ h~m changed a blt, noting that the biggest factor i~ right- of-~y c~te. Hr. ~re stated t~t t~ Sales Tax Committee reco~lzed that a ~, long term financing pr~ram is not needed to overcome the proble~ in Collier County, ~t rather a system of gap financing which ~ld Ill~ the ~ty to get ~er the hump. He noted that In outer ~earm of t~ pr~aa, t~ co~te ~1~ d~op eubetantta]ly, as the ~ork t~a place, a~ then the ongoing ~enuen, i.e. impact fees, ga~ tms, itc., ~Jll ~Jn to take ~er. ~--lemlo~r SauCers called attention to the Collier County ~pJtal I~r~e~nt ~lm~nt ~ronoJ~ of Changes, and noted that on J~ lO, 1989, the Co. lm~lon approved the total value of S233 million. ~e J~JcatN t~t Jf that fl~re Jn subtracted from the ~313 million as pro~sed t~y, t~re is a difference of $76 million. Ne re~rted t~t t~ State ro~ projects a~unt to ~41 million and the t~t ~t~n t~ tJrlt u~te of Septem~r 26. 1989 and today, there is ~ ~le million Increase a~ t~ concept for lame h~l ~en adopted. Be ~t~ t~t t~ee t~ careerism Involve the biggest differences, ~ ~ ~ee ~ problem in approving the pro~eed u~ate. ~Ir~nta] Se~lcee ~ainlstrator ~renz listed that h~ has pr~lMd t~ CoMliilon ~ith a ~re reaso~ble esti~te of the Capital I~r~wnts for t~ Dral~ge [leMnt. He noted that this la baled u~ [~ ~ter Plan as a~pt~ In Au~st. He explained that the con- ~ltant l~k~ at Ich~ull~ t~se nurture out to 20 years in the ~t of ~77 million. He re~rted that In the next five yearl, the ntnt cost ~111 ~ 814 Illllon, rather than the ~44 million as pro- ~ In t~ Cl[ of last sprl~. O~h ~eMnt Pla~r ~verty stated that ~rsuant to the ~ti~ of ~ptel~r lath, Staff presented the CIE, Including the ~t~ ~rtlon of SE 951, to the Planning Commission. He noted that Page 35 September 25, 1990 th~ cost of that project is mil.7 million and has b~en added as a pro- ~ect iff the Traffic portion of the Ele~nt. He advised that It has b4~en brought to his attention that the project name of SR 951 from P~mlnsall Drive to the ~t~rco Island Bridge Is Incorrect. He related t~t ~ refers to this project am South of New York Drive to the Bri~e, ~ mtmff ~11 ~ke t~t correction prior to the final prlnt$~ of tbs CIE. Mr. ~erty l~$cmt~ t~t t~ CCPC recommended that the ~lsslon m~r~e the C~plt~l Impr~e~nt Element and that con- si~r~tI~ ~ given to f~r ~sslbllltles for l~erlng the cost of the licit: l) lnitlmte ~ prxess to r~lew all Levels Of Service, and ~r t~; 2) c~$4er ~~ntm to the Or--th Management Plan by ~lterl~ t~ ~nner la ~ich t~ ~$ for Parks and Recreation facili- ties Is determined with options such ~s Including the City of Naples l~ento~ ~s p4rt o{ the C~ty's inventory; or removing the City M4plem ~lltlon from t~ for~li t~t Is used to determine the r~ired f~cilltles for ~11P~rks ~ Recreation f~cllltles; 3) ~l~ ~t~te ~ed ~ch p4rks am part of the Co,inty's Regional Pmrk Inventor; I~ 4) re-ex4ml~ 1~ ~ ~lldlng costs for n~ ~M~ mta- tlo~ ~ rev$~ the option of renting v~rmum construction. ~r. ~verty stated that the c~es ~s previously m~ntioned are: the SM Q)l project, ~ t~ c~nge mm ~ted by Mr. Lorenz. ~SssSoner Vol~ ~sked if t~ southern s~g~nt ~finitely ~t of t~ St~te'm Five Year Work Proirtm. Co~lssloner · ~ ~vl~d t~t this project Is out of the State's work Plmn for ~-~, ~t It Is the numar one priority to be added back In the prNr~ for 19~6. ~e relmted that the MPO established that priority. In ~r to Co~$ssion~r VoI~, Chief Trans~rtmtlon Planner Per~ ~vlsed that {4.1 million is identified for the fill for the SR ~l project, ~t ~c~u~ the Itmte 41tered the ~mount of the filling to ~ ~, t~ ~t of the fill that would co~ from the Deltona d~ication wam ~ncertain. Page 36 September 25, 1990 Coimissionar Volp~ stated tbet the Commission established the Policy of ll~ for long-ter~ debt and Staff is now recoemendln9 that t~e percentage be increased fro~ 13~ to Nr. ~r~ explai~d t~t ~s~d on the uniqueness of the sales t~ utlllzition, this ~kes ~re sense since It ~111 not represent a ste~y fl~ of ~bt. hlsslo~r Vol~ l~lclt~d tht o~ of th~ Ele~nts of the Or.th ~e~nt Plan Is Interg~ern~ntal Coordination. noting that th~r~ ~lll ~ ~00 sllllon ~rth of n~ sc~ls, each ~tth a ~s- naslus, a~ questioned ~hy a County ~nastu~ Is needed. Hr. ~verty advl~d that ~blic Services Administrator O'~nnell Is ~gotlstlng ~lth th~ ~c~l District ~or the us~ of recreational f~ilitl~m, m~ sm ti. goem on, those facilities say not b~ needed ~ ~gr~s~nt Is accomplished. Cmlssloner ~lght stated t~t only the slddl~ and high C~ity Park ~lth a ~sl~ In an area where there are only el~- ~nt~ sc~ls ~lt~t Nlrb res~ct to th~ ~lloc~tion of th~ I ~111Caplt~l I=proves~nt le~, Cmlssloner Vol~ r~e~led t~t l~st year when the Update to t~ CIE [leant ~s pres~t~d, th~ Co~lsslon approved ~n allocation o[ 2~ of t~ I Hill for t~ CIE projects ~nd 80~ for the non-CIE pro- ~ectm, He Indicated that n~xt year It will be 41~, and questioned why lees of a co~lt~nt will ~ ~de ~er the next 5 year period. ~re explal~d that It la State's opinion that all the additional reve~ available will ~ ~eded for non-CIE projects particularly light of t~ fact t~t It t~ ~d la to ~ caped at ~12.T million it will ~art~r rguce t~ a~nt ot available ~ney for non-CIE pro- ~ects, ~lch relate6 back to the ~blic policy choice of property tax or Miss t~. h~liJ~ Vo~ ~ggest~ t~t Lt I ne~ revenue I~ce Jl i~tifi~ or I~r~ed ~ the voters there needs to ~ a fall back ~iti~. Be l~lcited t~t he ~ld like the op~rtunlty to revl~ Page 37 September 25, 1990 the non-ClI proJacto to uka ours that the majority of the Commission I~ In ~reMnt with t~ recow~tlon= of Staff. Mr. McLemore IMlcat~ t~t ~ ~l ~ objection to thl, request. ~~t ~t tO ~ W~t~ In tM fall ~ t~t the ~blic ln~t ~ith regard to t~ Gr~th ~nage~ent Plan over t~e four ~e~rm~ ~ t~ ~rk of Staff ~l ~en closely scrutinized by the v~r1~s cmlttees. He related that the S~les Tax Committee ~as pre- sented ~ltb the ~ lnfomtl~ ~s presented by Hessrs. HcLemore and Archibald t~y, contr.ry to re~rk~ th4t have been m~de by 4 ~ew ~rl Of t~ Comlttee. fie re~rted t~at t~ere a~e addtttona~ revenue ~rces available, ~ l~ntifl~ ~ the S*les Tax Coulttee, many of ~lch t~ Coulssion ~ t~d~ ~ com~ndably so ~lth res~ct to i~reasJ~ l~Ct feee a~ pr~ldlng for developer contrl~tlons. He was pr~S~ with mlelnfor~tlon, and thl~ In ~ncorrect. He explained t~t M feela t~t t~ re~rt, am presented by the Committee, Mr. Ira Evan~ clt~ t~t t~ facto on which the CIE are based are 4 ~eArm oJd ~ ~rl~ t~ pant 3 ~nth~ thing~ have ~p~ened ~ Mken It a ~ ~1] ga~, i.e. ~latlon and gro~t~. Ee no,ed t~t t~re ~ ~n a distortion in the It4tl~tlc4l method~ which were ~. Be re~rt~ t~t the C~nty u=es numbers of dwelling unJt~ ~n ~te~]n$~ ~l~t$on ~hich i~ b4~ed on Cert~flcate~ of Occupant, ~t tM Cm Bureau u~ the n~r of ~ople. He indicated that S~ tM~ ~ople ~ drive on the ro~ds, and occu~ ~ell~ngs. He ~rll~ t~t ~t thi~ t$~, the ~vel Of 8e~lce on Airart Road Ss ~c~t~ble, ~t fro= J~nu~ry through Hay, It Is entirely d~fferent. ~ e~)~S~ t~t If g~]ine price= continue to ~ncrea=e, the County ~ ~t r~ire tM ~ ro~ ca.city. He questioned h~ ~ch of the Page 38 September 2S, 1990 Capital Is~roveunt contained in FI 90-91 1. planned to be paid for by revenue get. rated try the proposed lC Sales Tax. He revealed that the · aplee D~lly ~ewe quotes ~90 sllllon, noting that he can only find $19 sllll~ In the Tentative 1991 Budget. He noted that It may not be ve~ practical to sell 837 sllllon ~orth of suntclpal bonds for road ~o~ts In tM next fllcll yemr. He suggested that this be post,ned or re-smlned. ~e ask~ h~ ~ch of the ~Y 90-91 Capital Isprovesent ~mm Is to ~ fl~nced ~ ~rr~lng. He cited that 1~ the Sales T~ R~en~ Is ~t ~ss~, the ordinance contaln~ a provision lndl- cltl~ t~t It ~ used as security for ~nds, and statements have been ~ t~t this ~111 ~t ~ co~ld~red a~ part of the ~nded Indebted- ~ss of t~ C~ty, ~t there ~uld only ~ short term ~rr~lng. t~U ~1~ ~1~1 ~l~g ~tl Clerk Boffm mt this tl~ Assistant C~nty ~nager ~re responded to the question r~lrdl~ Collier C~nty's ~rr~lng plan and ~tated that hl~ office ~111 ~ ~rkl~ ~lth t~ Finance Coultt~ to assemble the cash r~lre~nts ~ l~tlfy ~t ~rr~lng Is needed In order to lmple- ~t tM Plan ~lcb s~ld ~ completed In a couple of ~ks. rmrk~ t~t ~ Is reluctant to discuss th~ ~rrowlng plan In detail until M sees t~ actual cash fl~ relative to the ro~d pro~ects. ~ted t~t ~r. Lltsl~er In a ~tl~g list ~e~k stmted that there ~ ~ntlcl~ted ~37 slllion ~rth of projects, but ~hat needs to be I~ntlfled Il ~hen t~sl pro~ects ~111 require funds. Hr. ~ees, ~e~nt ~nd Budget Director, stated that for ~lscal ~e~r 1991 there are t~ priory areas ~here debt Is contemplated for CIE pro~ects, fie explained that one of the areas Is In the utilities dlvlsl~ ~re ~st of their capital pro~ects ~111 ~ ~th water and ~r CIE pro~ects. Re disclosed that the utilities division la pre- tictl~ I~t Ill million ~rth of n~ debt. Hr. ~ees identified the other significant debt as road pro~ects. ~ ~1~ t~t Mst ~ek the Fiance Cosslttee ~111 decide as to ~h of tM re~ir~ funds ~111 ~ ~nded short rets, bottled short te~, or ~t~r It ~111 ~ ~nded and ~hat the options are. He Page 39 ~eptember 25. 1990 ~ that wb~thlr or not ~ht salsa tax passes will a~fect what dect- alo~J ara actually carried out. In rm~po~ to Coealaaloner Volpe. Hr. HcLeeore replied tha~ there w$11 ~ the ~ed for ~a t~ of short term ~rrowlng, but at this tl~ c~t give an exact ~t or length o~ time. He cited $37 n$11i~ as a ~rse ca. sce~rlo for this year. ~r. ~l,s a~ress~ the ~estlon raised regarding the budget and t~ ~r cent el t~ CIP use o~ the one mill fund which Is 49X today a~ ~er t~ five-year plan will ~ 9~. C~lsslo~r Vol~ expressed t~t he ha~ a problem right now a~r~l~ a ~l~nclng plan ~here there has been no Justification for t~ r~ctlon from 20~, which Il w~t the Board approved back lo Ju~, to 91 ~er a ~lve-year ~rl~. C~lssloner S~na~n ~estloned w~at portion of the one cent ~les t~ Is ear~rked Ior Ilscll year 1990-19917 ~. ~Nees explai~d t~t the tentative ~dget plan only ldefl- tlIlem t~ r~efluo ~rco rot the S37 million In road projects as ~i~ received from the one ce~t sales tax or l~ the tax do~o not pass t~fl ~rom t~ m~clll district road ~oopso~nt. Comimolo~r SauCers reo~nded to Mr. Ev~n~ queotlon by stating tht Il t~ m~cial district road assessment ordinance lo created prior to January 1991 then It ~111 ~p~ar on tha tax roles In 1991 and t~re ~111 ~ ~ revenue realized In the ~iocal year 1990-1991. ~$omloner Vol~ asserted that the funds needed for Ilscal year 19~-199I ~111 ~ ~rrMd or ~ed. ~e added that how much can be ~rr~ ~111 de~ on cash fl~, and It has already ~en stated that t~ c~h ~1~ 8~nt cannot ~ determined at thio time. Mr. ~re a~reo~ t~ isle of sunsetting and explained that tb oNl~e states t~t the tax M111 sunset In ten year or when the ~t o[ M~ il received to complete the obligation or [undo ~or tb p~ect. He ~t~ t~t ~ vets or tho ~blic If the obligation lo ~t c~leto the t~ cmn ~ continued. Con iosioner Saunders r~tbr clarirl~ ~ ~ing the example o~ assuslng the entire list of 990 projects ie cotpleted In five years; however, there is a ten year bond Issue of $3? million worth of projects, then during year slx the sales tax would I>e collected ar~ with the bond redemption provisions Illowlng tl~ ~/ to ~ redee~d early, these bond ~ould be paid off a~ t~re ~ld still ~ ~ su~et provision. Hr. ~re ~ressed the 1e9~1 opinion on this Issue regardin~ mtitlw t~t this was disclosed to the advisory committee some time Mr. ~verty of Or. th ~ge~nt *ddressed the Issue regarding r4te of ~l~tl~ gr~th versus ~ctual by stating that the most *~roprl.te projection that th~ County could use Is the Bureau of ~lc ~sineel Research troi the University of Florida. He expl.lMd t~t their high rings projection ~st closely matches the C~ty~l ln-~N pro~ect$~l. Ne ~ded that when the ne~ census dat. Il ~vill.ble t~ fl~rel will ~ rec~lcul.t~d. He stated that the ;e~rted ~ the pre]]mI~ cen~um countm. Hr. ~verty contlr~d ~$mmioner Volp~'m ~tatement that the pro- Jected ~lation numar used for CoJIJer County 1~ 241,000 ~opI. for ~. bller, Preoi~flt of Collier C~nty Civic Federation, stated t~t ~ ~ld like to see t~e County re-evaluate their needs according to t~ f~ds evallable ~ s~clfy ~lternative funding ~ethods other t~ t~ ~aleo t~. Co~t~xlo~r ~a~erl xtated that the ~ard of County ~l~llo~r~ ~x ldentlfl~ to the State alte~t~ve funding xource~ ~ r~ir~ ~ ~tate ]~. Re xddffd t~t the ~ard voted to ~t ~ral alter~tive fu~lng ~ource~ In the event t~t the ~ c~t x~l~ t~ ~ ~t pale. He referred to page 45 of the ~lt~l l~r~e~nt Ele~nt ~lch ~tate~ that l~ the ~al~m tax doe~ ~t ~ t~re ~lll ~ a countywide x~clal a~seesment dlxtrlct, and tM ~rd ~ vot~ u~l~ly to ~mple~nt thl~ asxe~l~ent which Page 41 8eptember 25, 1090 eff~t alii I~ lm ~ valorem t~ of tax. Coaalssloner Saunders noted that t~ l~ct faa for fo~ have ~re than doubled this year. ~m~iselonar S~nahan reurked that the lnpact fees current]V In ~]aca aJ]l ~]y ~ of t~ la.dm to compJete the projects In the ~1~ ~lch 1~ up 14~ fron la~t year. ~leel~r Vol~ asked If there alii be an excess of lapact fees fin the r~lo~l ~arka a~ If thlm excess could be used fo~ other c~tm In t~ C~nt~? 8r. ~vertv explained that he believes that therl lm a restriction aa b the ~eglonal park ~pact fees can be ~. Be a~ t~t It ~m to ~ used for either regional park land Nr. ~11 Corkrln, pro~rty ~er of Naples, also ~sttoaed h~ ~h of t~ f~s ~lthln t~ ~e cent sales tax, assuming It passes, c~ ~ ~$ft~ ~ on ~t ~mll7 He stated th~t he feels the ~blic is ~tltl~ to ~ c~plete description off this process along ~lth the expla~tlon of the l~9ality. 8$s stated his ~econd ~estlon Is ~hat Is t~ ~scrlption off annual funding regardln9 the one cent sales tax, ~ asked If this refers to the ~n~ ~Ire~dy In the b~nk or the ~t t~t Is In a =p1~1~* over the n~xt t~n years? ~slet~t C~nty ~ger Ncbe~re reiterated that what Is being asked for Is the cash ~1~ plan ~hlch Is ~hat ~111 ~ worked on ~tthin t~ ~t c~ple of ~eks. Ne e~plained that ~ach budget year a one ~ear ~rtlon of a five year plan im adopted, ~htch aeans for the one yea~ pl~S~ ~r$~, t~re is ~ney In the bank. Hr. ~re c~nted In regards to the shifting of revenues that this c= ~ ~ to ~t existing project de,nde, but n~ pro~ects Cmt ~ ~N. ~e e~lainN t~t the appr~ed list of pro~ects ~y ~e ~ J~re~ of coats ~er t~ ten year ~rlod of time ~hlch ~y c~ · s~rt~e of r~enu~ r~ired, and then the County ~ould ~ forc~ to go ~ck to the ~blic and explain that another five years Repteaber 25, Com~lasJoner Sh~h~n recounted that In essence if one project Is co. plated Md there Im a aurplua of fund~ then these funds can be shifted to ~th~r ~lsslo~r ~ers noted t~t there are stroh9 protections for t~ ~bllc r~glrdl~ t~ ~stlons of w~at If th~r~ Is not th~ popula- tls ~h t~t Is projected lnd ~ will thts effect the CIE and the ~ cent ~lel tax. He explained that the effect on the CIi ts that If a l~el of se~lce for a planned road is not met then the road Is ~t ~llt, I~ ~lnt~ ~t t~t the public is protected by the sunset pr~lsl~ r~ardl~ the one cent sales tax. He related that with the ~ cent sales tee, on~ third of t~e revenue will be paid by tourists. 15~ to lO~ ~tll ~ paid ~ ~ople ~lldlng ho~es for resales ~~ of the tax on ~terlals, and 30~ to 40~ will be paid ~ ~lller C~nty residences; ~t If the sales tax does not pass then t~re ~lll ~ a s~clal assess~nt district ls~sed on the Collier ~ty residences for ro~. To Nr. Keller's tie.lief of these numbers, Cosslssloner Saunders stated t~t the ~rcentages he gave are factual. St~ley ~le, resident of Collier County, comeented that he wished to c~ t~ ~ard for the backlog they have sh~ their staff. ~rold Nell, previous ~a~r of the Citizens Advisory Coaalttee for Or~th ~e~nt, pr~ious chair~n of ~bltc Facility ~u~o~lttee, a~ previous ~b~r of Sales Tax Coamlttee, stated that ~ ~ls~d to encourage the adoption of the u~ate of the Capital I~r~mnt [leant as pre.anted, co--nd the ~ard and their staff for t~ r~l~s ~de on the u~ate, and added for the Board to co~tl~ ~l~ the g~ ~rk th~ Mve sho~ they can do. ~rlotte ~st~n, representing the Lea~e of ~oaen Voters of ~llJer ~nty, called attention to the fact that the storswater uti- lity la ~rt ot t~ overall CIE financing sus~ry plan, ~t It ~ill be ~. S~ ~estloned ~t the cost of this bond will ~. ~sistant Cmty ~nager ~re answered that again this cannot Page 43 $eptesber 25, 1990 tm ~red until h, m~etm ~lth the finance conslttee which w111 be over t~ next c~ple of ~eks. He anted that at that rise the County NIll ~ve an~rs to these ~estlons ~hlch are directly related to the ~miN of the malem tax. To Hrm. Nemt~n'm ~emtlon regarding an lnterlocal agreesent slth t~ City of N~ples, Mr. ~re stated that ther~ Is a list of pro- Jects t~t ~re In ~gree~nt ~lth the City of Naples. Jl~ ~sklll, representing People Active for Collier County ~ntl~ls, re~rked t~t he ~grees ~lth the CIE proposal. ~re ~re ~ ot~r m~kers. ~J~ ~l~ly, t~t t~ ~2lc ~a~lng ~ c1~. ~~J~r volp ~ t~t t~ ~c~ ~1 u~te of t~ CIE b Itmt~ Ot$liU frs 44 to 14 alo~ ~lth the mtl~latlo~ M foll~ 1) Wm t~ $nterl~al ~~nt with the City of ~ e$~ t~ State of Flori~ ~rtl~larly am It relates to t~ ~ ~tin el~t of t~ gr~h ~ge~nt PI~ on Collier C~t~ ~ ~$n ~$t f~ n of t~ ~$mtiN facilities; 2) accept of t~ ~ ~~t$~ pr~t~ $n the ~ received Etna CIB ~t~ of t~ g~h ~t PI~ ~ $n con~ctlon w/th t~ ~$~ ~ ~1 of t~ f~ear llet of ~n~I~ pro~ectm; 4) t~t ~ ~A~r ht al~ a11 otbr conlt~tm ~. ~chA~ld ~1~ ~, ~ ~t t~ ~ l~torl~ ~ reflect~ ~ f~t~e or ~ ~ ~ ~E~ 5) t~t ~ ~t of t~ fl~l~ ~~ for ~1 of ~io ~J~t, Staff's r~~tt~ ~t b ~c~t~ September 25, 1990 ~m~t $e tbs Wop~r allocation b~tw~en ClZ ~d non-CIE proJecte; ~d t~t t~ ~t~ ~er'a Office ~4 t~ir staff provide ~ of et ~l~ of ~ i~ebtemm lm tied to the projected ~les In res~nse to Co~ismJoner Hasse, ~r. McLe~ore commented that the ~sue regarding the ~rcentage on the one mill fund concerns h~m ~cause of the data which mt~]l needs to be compiled over the next couple of ~ek~. He misted that without the knowledge of the outcome of these ~om$~ ~etinga he cannot project any numbers. ~1~ fail~ for l~k of ~c~. Co~ism$oner Sau~er~ stated that th~ critical issue with Co~lone~ Vol~'a ~tJon ~ the ~rcentage of the one m~l] tax ~iog ear~rk~d for C~Z proJectm. He pointed out that he does not ~&nt to have the Co~$~mion t~ $tme]f to a ~rcentage arb$trar[]~ ~a~e during ~e~ ~dget c~cJe t~t ~rcentag~ l~ re-evaluated. explained tha~ to obligate ~0~ ~ ~ear for the next five ~earm to CIE pro~ecte S~ ~t prat:tics]. Co~S~sSooer Vol~ reseeded that he would lik~ to leave the centage r~est a~ It wa~ voted for and accepted six ~nths ago at the Co~]smloner Saunde~m ~inted out that wh~t l~ don~ this date will ~ve ~ effect on t~ fiscal yea~ 1990-1991 budget and suggemted that the C~lssion walt until Start ~e~t~ back to them regarding the ~u~tlficat$on for the non-CIE p~o~ects to determine what amount ~ available from the one mill fund for th~ ~ollowlng four ~mi~tant County ~nage~ McLe~re stated that he feelm that If ~ cent la changed f~om 9~ to 20~ then the CIE five-year plan wouid ~ tO ~ re~]~ed ~cause there ~u~d ~ a different set of reve- ~ ~~ to ~k with. In ~e~pon~e to Comml~mione~ Vo]pe, M~. ~~e etated t~t the $30 million which will b~ r~moved for drain~e i~ contained within the utility ~i~ 4/1 (~iooS~r Vol~ ~~), t~t the Ord$~ce as n~- P~ge 46 betel iai titled belG. bi adopted ~ entered Into Ordinance Book ]1o. 40 laid tbs C~pltal la~rrove~nt Elel~nt t~ approved with the changes ee lbdlcated b7 staff ~htch are the ttm on lntsrlocal agree~nts, ~tlozz~ of tbs CCPC, the COlmltlents for public facilities co.plied with In the DRI's and PUD's, and providing an estimate of t~e portl~m of tbs bom~ tle~ to the salsa tax: ORDXIA~ AN ORDINANC~ )~IqDXNO COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE 89-05, AN ORDINANCE ENACTING Alii) ESTABLISHING A GROI4TH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR COLLIER COUNTT, IrI,ORIDA, ~U~ TO ~E ~AI. GOVER~ENT COMPREHENSIVE PCA~XNG A~ ~D D~E~E~ REGULATION ACT OF 1985 AND CHAPTER 93-5, ~IDA A~INIS~TXVE CODE, NINI~N CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF ~AL ~V~R~ C~EHE~XVE P~NS AND DETERMINATION OF C~XA~C~; ~ CORR~INO, ~PDATING AND HODI~ING CERTAIN COSTS, R~]~ SO~C~, ~UP~RTXNO ~LICIE$ AND THE DATES OF CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITI~ ~A~D X~ ~g COLLIER COUN~ GR~ ~NAGEME~T P~ CAPITAL X~~~ ~L~ FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS l~ FISCAL ~AR3 1990/91 ~R~H lgg4/gs; ~OVIDI~G FOR SEVERABILI~; AND Co~JssJoner Valise stated that he Is opposed to the motion solely because he is oG~oo~d to the allocation that has be. an proposed with Feel)oct to t~ ~ Bill cBpitBl J~r~eMnt le~. H~ added he would pFefeFF~ to ~e It mt the ~rent mlloc.tion of 20W fo~ CIE and for ~-ClE. OI~)IILICl 1~-78 LIX~TIIO ~11 till ITLIOLRO BOXLDXIG CODZ I/]TH I'~ 1989 I.E/IIIOI:I &l ~ I1' COLLIER (:~.0~~E - M)OI'T~D l~gal notice having b~en published in the Naples Dally News on Avg~Jst 20, September l, September 8, and September 15, 1990, as evi- denced by Affidavit of Publication flied with the Clerk, public hearing Mas oG~eruld to consider adopting the 1988 Standard Building Co~e ~nd 1989 Revisions with an amending Ordinance to cover the spa- cia3 needs or Collier County. Dele Davenport of the Code Coapllance Department stated that the propos~t ordinance ia also endorsed by the Builders and Contractors Association. Coa~laolor~r Shanahan questioned if the proposed ordinance ia the standard building code with the 1989 revisions and local ~elld~ents to ~hlch Mr, Davenport conflrsed this to be true. 79 P4ge 48 September 25, 1990 Comml~im~r ~tsexsah,azt mav~d, eeconded by Commlaaton,ar VOll;~ and be a4~rte4 mad ~nte~-~d Into Ordinance Book No. 40: ORD l II&IC~ 90-75 AN ORDINANCE ENACTING ONE PART OF THE "COLLrER COUNTY BUILDING CODE' BY ADOi~TING THE 'STANDARD BUrl,DING CODE, 1988 EDITION WITH THE 1989 REVISIONS, INCLUDING APPENDICES A, D, F, I, J, N, AND P; AS PUBLISHED BY THE SOUTHERN BIIII, DTfIG CODE CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC,, AS FURTHER AHENDED BY THIS ORDINANCE; AMENDING IO1,4 RELATING TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT; AMENDING 102.4 RELATING TO UNSAFE BUILDINGS; AJqENDINO 105 RELATING TO THE BOARD OF ADSUgT~fENTS AND APPEALS; AMENDING 202 RELATING TO DEFINITIONS; A~IENDING 301.2,1 RELATING TO SCOPE OF THE PiPE DISTRICT; AMENDING 302,2.2 RELATING TO GROUP 'H" OCCUPANCY; AMENDING 302.2.6 RELATING TO EXTERIOR WALLS OF TYPE IV BUILDrNGS; AMENDING 403.4 RELATING TO TENAiFI' SEPARATION; AMgNDING 408.2 RELATING T~ SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OF GROUP H OCCUPANCIES; AMENDING 507.q RE~ATENG TO FIRE EXTINGUISHER~; AJKENDING 508 RELATING TO ACCESSIBILITY FOR PHYSICALLY NANDICAPPED; A~gNDING 610 RELATING TO BUll,DINGS LOCATED ON TNE SAJq~ ~; ADDING 702.1.7 R~LATENG TO AUTOMATIC FIRE ~UPP~E~SION SYST~ AETERNAT~V~S; AMEND 706.6 R~LATING TO WOOD SHInGLeS AND SRA[~; ADDING 70~,q RELATING TO PALM F~OND ROOFS; ADDING 70~.5 ~[LATING TO CHICKenS; ADDING 71~,2.3 EgEATING TO B~ I~SULATIO~; ADDING 813 RELATING TO SWIPING POOl, ENCLOSURES; ~DINO ~O2.3 ~ELATIMO TO STANDPIPES; AMENDING 902.~ RELATING TO STA~DPIPE~ ~ING CONSTRU~IO~; AMENDING 1IO4.4 RELATING TO ~[RG~N~ EGRESS OPEN~NG~; ADDING 1117,~.1. I REI,ATING TO A~D ~ISg~S; ADDING 1114,5.3 R~LATING TO ~}lf)WER DOOR~; AMENDING 1302 ~[LATING TO FOOTING~ AND FOUNDATIONS; AMENDING 1707 RE~ATING TO ~INO, ~Nl~G AND ~RED HOl, g~, ADDING 1707.7.5 RELATING TO TOP Pf, ATE~: ADDING 170~.2.4 NEf, AT)NG TG T~US~ED RAFTERS; ADDING P[OU~P~M~T~ D{I~I~G CO~T~UCT~O~ ADDING 2]01 . ~ ~ ~ELATING TO ANCHORING AND T~K-D~ OF T~PORARY CONSTRUCT[ON FACILITIES; ~E~DI~G 2802 ~ELATING TO ST~H~TU~AL ALHN[NUN ~ONSTRUCT[ON; ~DI~G APPENDIX 'A" I~ THE FOI, LON~NG ARRAS; ADDING AtO3.1.1.1 ~TINO TO P~ONIBITED ACTIVITIES PR~O~ TO P~R~[T ISSUANC~ ; ADDING AIO3.~.2.~ ~ELAT~NG TO FIRE DAMAGED STRUCTURES; AMENDING AlO~.2.~ ~gLATING TO NIN[~U~ FLOOR AND SLAB ELEVATIONS; A103.3 R~LATI~G TO EXA~INAT~O~ OY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; ADD A[03.3.3 ~LAT[NG TO INSPECTION AFFIDAVITS; AMENDING ~103.6 R~LAT[NG TO P~T I~NT, TI~ LImiTATIONS AND SUSPENSION OR ARANDONH~NT, ~[~DI~G A103.6.3 RELATING TO PLAN~; ADDING A103.6.4 R~LAT[NG'TO · ~IRO~AL ~OTECTION: A~E~DING A103.7 RELATING TO SCHEDUL~ FOR PIN. IT FEES; ~ENDING AlO3.a.5 RELATING TO POSTING P~R~[T; ~DI~G AIO3.8.6 E~LATI~G TO R~QUIR~D INSPECTIONS; A10~,9. 1 ~E~ATING TO RUI[,D~NG ~CCUPANCY ~NSPECT~NS; A~END[NG A105.4 HELATING TO ~OARD ME~BER~ AND P~OCEfJURES; AMENDING Al07 RELATING TO VIOLATIONS AND P~NALTIES: AMENDING APPENDIX R~LATIN~ TO HURRICAN~ RE~IJIREM~ Fr~ EXTE~IO~ WALLS, T~E BEA~S A~D ~D CONSTRUCTION; ~HDING APPENDIX "J" ~E[,AT~NG TO ENERGY COnSERVATIOn; ~ENDI~G APPenDIX "~" RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OF O~E ~D ~ F~ILY ~ELLINO~; REPEALING O~DINANCE~ NO, 86-49 AND · 0, ~7-~9 A~D ~OVIDIRG FOR CONFLICT AND 5EVERAflILI~, AND ~IDI~G FOR A~ EFFE~IVE DATE. Xtm ~ It:~OTAF2~0~I ~O-462, ~:~ FrrzT~OI ~q1'-90-11, SALVATOR~ C. BCUD~IX, O~ ~ & C~XLD~, ~~O LAURA JLlgD ROMA~O CXOCCA, II~Z~rllo 000,,,: 80 ,, legal not/ce having been published In the Naples Dally News on Sepia·bar 9, 1990, a· evidenced by Affidavit of Publication fJTed with the Clerk, public hearing was o~ened to consider Petition SMP-90-11, filed by Selvatore C. ScuderI, of Scuderi & Childs, representing Laura end Rosario CIocca, requesting Subdivision Heater Plan approval for 'South BarfleJd Battery' for property located one ·lie south of Mlnterberry Drive, adjacent to Heights Waterway and South Barfleld Drive In kctione 20 ar~ 21, ?cwrnehip 52 South, Range 26 gmat, Marco Zei&n(l, Florida, containing 3.5 acres. Pl·nner Milk stated that the Intent of the subject petition is to I~ek approval of a Subdivision Master Plan for a four-lot single family reside, ntis! subdivision on 3.5 acres. He advlsed that the existing 3.5 acts p4rceJ Ie undeveloped 4nd zoned RSF~2. He noted that lands to t h~ north, east and south are platted lots zoned RSF-3 ~ of which contain single family residences while other lots ars vacant. He added to the west is Caxaab·s Pass. Mr. Milk advJied that the proposed project contains a eaxlsua den- elty of 1.14 unite per gross acre. The density of the proposed Subdivision Ma·tar Plan lB, therefore, consistent with the Growth Itenage~ent Plan ·nd future land use element. Hr. Hllk cited that the petitioner has requested & variance to the · ubd]vJaJon regulation requJresmnt that local or minor collector 3treats t~e a einimua of 660 feet apart. Ha informed that the proposed road, Battery Drive, iea limited access, private road, serving four 3ota, tharefore, Staff recommends that this variance be granted. Hr. Milk reported the petitioner also requests a variance to allow · ~uper elevated design of the proposed road since the topography of the site makes a crown road de, sign not practical, and Staff recommends that this variance el~o be granted. Hr. Hllk informed that last year the petitioner and o~ner had the property rezoned frol RO, recreational open space, to RSF-3, and as a Page 48 September 25, 1990 con{)anlon item. th~ asked for ~ multi-docking facility for lots 1, 2, I~ 3 to t~ ~d~cent pro~rty which the ~tltloner Wt. Milk lt~t~ t~t 8tmff ~ roll ~roprlale County agencies hve r.i~ thlm ~titlon ~nd h~ve no objection to Its approval sub- ~ect to stl~latlons listed on the agreement sheet, Exhibit A. He ~ted t~t the CC~ held their ~bllc hearing Septem~r 6, 1990, and fo~ar~d ~-90-11 to t~ ~ard of County Commissioners with the reco~tJon for appr~al ~ a vote of 6/0. subject to Staff's stl- ~urJce ~tcalf. Vice President of the Marco Island Civic ~cJatlon. c~nted t~t after r~l~ing the pro.amd project, he c&~ to the conclusion t~t this will ~ an asset to the community. In ree~nse to Co~leeloner Haeee'l question, he stated that he ~are t~t there will ~ a ro~ in t~ front ~nd In the back of the r~idencee of ~th ~rfleld C~rt; and .Inca the probJe= was resolved to ~ve t~ ~m face ~rfleld C~rt, there are no complaint, from t~ee reli~ncel. ~ ~J~ 4/0, (kiNi~ ~ ~t ~ MItiw llet~ In t~ ~t ~t. I:I~OLOTIOg ~463, ~ ~~ ~-~10, ~IN A. DIAZ OF s~ ~ ~s ~~ ~ ~ ~ s~ or c.R. 05~ - ~D ~ptem~r 9, 1990, ~s ~ldenced ~ Affl~vlt of ~bllca~on f~led t~ Clerk, ~blic ~mrlflg Mai o~fled to coflolder Petition 5MP-90-19, riled ~ Zermln A Diaz of Mlloofl~ MllJer~ ~rton, & P~ek, Inc., re~eoti~ Su~lvlolon ~ste~ Plan approval fo~ Tollg~te Co~e~cIal Center ~e ~ ~ ~lflc~tlono to ~oe One, located on the north · Jde of ~vll ~lev~rd 4~ t~ ealt Ilde of C.R. 951, part of Section 35, T~lhlp 49 ~t~, RMnge 26 [alt, coniJ.tlng of 34.45 acres. Planer At. Id etated t~t t~ pro~ect ~ located at the co.er of the ~fltereectlon of C.R. 951 a~ Devi~ Boulevard and con- elite of 34.45 ~crel ~hlch Jnclud~ ~ r~cently acquired portion Al~lgitor AII~ right-of-way conlJltJ~ of ~pproxJ~tely 9 Hr. At. Id ~lled t~t if thJe ~tJtJon 1~ ~pprov~d th~ pro~ect will c~lllt of 17 co~rcl~J develo~nt tract~ and 2 ~eter unage- ~nt tr.cte, fie ~ted t~t the ~ltlo~l ~creage ~nd development trictl ~lJl ~t Jflcre~le t~ lfltenlity of developient ~lthin the lite ~eJ~ t~ up~ lJlJte of developM~t itated In the ~D doculent. Hr. Ar~ld lnfor~d that ~cceil ~ lllited to t~ ~lnts along ~ie ~ul~rd ~ ~ acceei ~111 ~ ~ll~ed on C.~. 951. Hr. ArT~old It~ted that the pro~e~ Su~ivi.lon Haster Plan cool.tent ~lth the Gr~th ~geMnt PI~ and the PUD docuMnt. ~ted t~t ~1] r~l~ lgenciee ~ve ~aluat~d th~ petition and reco~- M~ t~lr ~ppr~el. He aftlrl~d that th~ CCPC heard thi~ ~tltlon on ~pte~r 6~ 1990, ~ rec~~d their Ipproval. In r~~ to Co~leeJo~r H~iee, ~r. Arnold cownted t~t the ~ ~ ~rtlon of the project ~ai old Alligator Alley right-of-way ~lch ~le ic~lr~ ~ lncor~rated into their PUO doculent In the Pmge 50 September 25, 1990 CoaalliJoMr Volpe questioned If this is consistent with what was plaid ~ t~ approval was given to Jncor~rate this ]and Into the project. Hr. A~Jd confJ~ that Jt il. To Cmtslioner Haase'e ~eltJon, Nr. Arnold commented that this pro~ect ~S]1 ~t Jspact the ~oada Jn that area. Co~Js~Joner Vol~ ~eatJoned why the stipulations have not been mJgned ~ the representative of the ~titioner? Hr. Arnold replied t~t in thle ca~e it ~as only due to tl~ constraints Jn getting the ~ckage t~ether for presentation Jn the agenda t~ay, and added that ~e~one J~ Jn agr~nt. Page O 1 Septeeb~.r 25, 1990 Assistant CountT l~r ~k:L,e~or~ ~t~ t~ foll~l~ its ~tl~ ~ t~ ~ of t~ h~ m to c~tl~e t~ lt~ ~ It~ tl0~ Its ~1~ Jl:~:~OLOYXOg 90-464, IqCRTAIIFIIUO TO ~ ~ ~~l~ P~ ~XCIP~ ~~ Y~X~ ~ ~T ~lT ~ ~~l~ RE~L~X~ ~. 90-411 Legel notice having ~en ~blJm~d In thm Napl~m Daily News on ~tem~r 4. lg90, am evidenced ~ Affl~vlt of Publication flied with t~ Clerk, ~bllc ~arlng w~s o~ned to consider adoption of a Resolu- tion ~rtmlnl~ to the M~ples Pr~uctlon P~rk Hunicipml Service Taxing ~ ~fit Unit and confirming Resolution Mo. 90-411 ordering the conmt~ctlon of ~t~ble water, mmnit~ry eewer, road and drainage lspr~e~ntl In the unit. Tom C~rec~e, Director of Capital Pro~ects ~anage~nt. stated t~t ~ A~mt ~, 1990 the ~mrd ~opted the roll.lng Resolutions: ~-409 ~ich confl~d the creation of the Maples Pr~uctlon Park mod pr~ldi~ t~t the tssessMnts procedures ~ levied ~nd emceed ~r- ~t to Ordl~ce 88-23; Reeolution 90-410 which confirmed mp~int- ~nt of the Maples Pr~uctlon Park ~ge~nt Couittee for the Page 52 September 25, 1990 purpose of insuring tl~l¥ and appropriate completion of project objectives; and Resolution 90-411 which provided for potable water, ~anitary se~er, road and drainage Improvements within the park. He &dd~d that on Au~st 21, 1990, the ~nrd adopted Resolution 90-428 ~lch a~r~ed the plnns, s~cl~icatlon~ ~nd co~t estimate for said lspr~e~nts. Hr. Conrec~e advised t~t the ~r~$~ of this ~bllc hearing to ~ar objections to the conflr~tlon of Resolution 90-411 so c~ proceed with tb~ final d~slgn, r~cel~ln9 bids, construction, and t~ n~le~ntal Professlo~l 5e~lces Agree~nt. Hr. Conrec~e lntor~d that the estlaated cost oI Improvements 86,556,147. Bill 2ones, ~lr~n of the S~clal Adv/so~ Committee, stated t~t this co~lttee ~s ~tl~s ~ry ~ek; and as a co~slttee citizens Involved ~ ~111 ultl~tely ~y for this, they plan to over- ~ th~ ~6.~ mllllo~ ~ollars. ~ ~dded that this Is the pur~s~ this committee. He advised that there wam a t~ seating held on 5eptes~r 18, 1990, a~ the m tco~ of the ~etlng Indicated that t~ a~roxJ~tely 75 ~ople t~re, they ~anted this pro~ect proceed. H~ Jnfor~d t~t a Jett~r ~4~ ~ent to re~ide~ce~ ~vl~ th~m o~ th~ ~tlng ~o they could voic~ any obJect~on~. ~6,556,147 m~S~ ~ this ~111 ~ spent. Hr. ~on~m contlr~ed that this ~s ~en done ~nd the pro~rty ~ers have ~en notified ~tth this lntor~tJon. Nr. Jonem explained t~t the notification sent to pro~rty ~rs Identities the Individuals pro~rty, the assessable f~tage, ~ the tentative aasess~nt. Falco~r Jones, pro~rty ~er, ~tahed to add that he Is in [avor ot t~ project; ~er, there la concern regarding the pay-back t~ ~llerl ~ suggested t~t It ~ considered as a ~nd Issue ~here there la a 20-25 year pay-out. Ne stated that this ~uld uke It lot e~ler on the s~ller pro~rty Nr. C~rec~e ~$s~ t~t this -Sll ~ considered and that the companion Items mgH2, mgH3, mgH4 presented today are only for interim £inanclng. David kfoosley of Raybro Electric Supplies stated that he Is l~ndowr~r In ~&ples Production Park and the footage stated In the letter received Is wrong as It pertains to his lot. He also pointed out tl~t when tmylng the pro~rty, he entered Into an escr~ ~sed on ~table w~ter, s~nlt~, ~nd utilities with th~ ~er/o~ers ~ ~re A ~fe Storage Place, Inc. ~nd ~nald Arnold, and n~ noted Hr. ~ones as~red that th, ~rrors on the [~tage ~111 ~ corrected. ~ stated his pro~rty ~p~rs to ~ loc4ted In the area ~tch ~111 ~ ~Ifect~d ~ the Toa Pee~ of ~llson, Hiller, ~rton & Pe~k, Inc. stated that he tb~ project engineer for this project ~nd concurred that corrections ~111N ~e as to true ~are f~tage of th~ property ~ed by Electric Supplies. In ~ddresslng the escr~ for the provision ol ser- vices, Hr. Peek comnted t~t this Is a ~tter ~t~een the seller, fie ~d~d t~t his studies sh~ that this pro~rty h~s no ser- vices · vall~ble to It, ~ Is l~ted 1~ ~n ~r~ ~hlch ~111 ~esed. ~ systems. ~r. Peek re~rked t~t they ~re trying to mvold this and ~xpl~lned t~t the mrem ~s ~en revl~ed for existing systems In the gr~d to ~ sure t~y mre consistent with the County's st~ndmrds ~nd mre mcceptable to the County for ~ership. ~r. Peek noted t~t the pro~rty ~er~ which do h~ve existing systems are sot Included In the ~sess~nt district ~hlch s~uld pr~ent duplication of services. Nr. J~s re~rk~ t~t pro~rty ~ers tn this area are looking for ~icel to co~ect to so they can develop their property. ~nty Attorney Cuyler presented for the record all the letters ~eceived regarding this project. o~r, ~ ~ ~r~i~a~ ia~-ov~onte in the ~nit. ~ &IIOCXATI3) ~ ~ ~ ~01 PAI~ MUI'IC:IPAL Iqro Conrecode, Director of Capital Projects Management, stated tibet this item Am a recommer~mtJon to consider adoption of a tio~ authorJzin~ m drm~ riot to ~xceed $6,500,000 on the ~J~ of credit for l~r~tm mm~Jmt~ with the Maples Pr~uctlon Park. ~r. ~rmc~ ~t~ tht on Aunt Y, 2~0, the ~mr~ adoptmd b~lut/~ 90-412 which mut~riz~ /~r~e~ntm to ~ ~ld ~mm~tm against ~Ated pro~rty ~erm. Re mdd~ tht these ~mmm~tm c~t ~ lffl~ ~tll c~lltlon of correction, and thrmfo~, this r~lutl~ Jm m M~ of interim fi~cJn~. lepte.~z- 28, !990 :Item ~ Mr. Coflrecode, Director of Capital ProJecto ~nagemeflt, reported t~t this ~te~ ~s a reco~tJon to adopt ~ resolution authorizing t~ ~c~lsXtlon of fee sl~l~ or ~r~tual non-exclusive roa~ay. dral~ge ~ utility interests ~ te~ra~ const~ct~on ease~nts ~n t~ ~ples Pr~t~on ~rk ~c~l ~e~ces T~ng and ~nef~t Unit. ~lltlo~r Vol~ ~lti~ If theri tm · comt atte~nt to the K~/m/tJ~ of the easts? ~. C~rec~e r~ll~ t~t th/m Am pmrt of t~ 9r~rt7 ~rl ~trl~tl~, 000, . 107 Page ~7 September 2~. 1990 ~r. Conrec~e explaA~ t~t on Feb~a~ 11, 1986, the ~ter~ Ants an Agree~nt ~or Professional Se~Jce~ with ~Jloon, Miller, ~rton, & Peek, inc., to prepare a PrelAalna~ Engineering Re~rt which pr~/ded for ~~ent ~rk ~ me~s of a Supplemental Agre~nt. He said this ~lmnt As for fi~l deol~ as e8ge~t, Fight-of-way o~ to~raphlc ou~eyo for a tota1 amount ~356,832. ~t f~ ~fml~l ~Ac~ with WA/~, NA1/~, ~ Clark Giles ~Jnted ~t t~t the original contract ~eo for ~90,000 tb ~lMflt ~o in tb ~t of ~356,832. He asked the C~nty Atto~ if this is in k~l~ with S~tJ~ 287.085 of t~ beJet~t ~ty Atto~ ~]gel r~]J~ tht the ~trKt ~l for 190,~0~ ~ tb ~lti~l elmntl Ire Jfl ~ way c~trilM ~ tb price r~ir~ to~ t~ ~rk initially pr~lded, Re coKl~ this ~leMnt fo In c~pliince with State Statutes. September 2~ 1990 ~ga] ~tlce ~vlflg ~efl ~bllshed lfl the Naples Dai]~ N~s ~ptei~r 9, 19~0, as evld~ced ~ Affidavit of ~blication fAZed with t~ Clerk, ~bllc hearing ~l o~ned to consider Petition V-90-12, fl3~ ~ ~ betty or ~ Co.ration, representing glize~th L. · omr3, r~emtl~ a 6 f~t variance from the required front yard Imt-~ck or 30 feet to 24 ~eet An a PUD zone, An order to construct d.p~, ~ t~ fo33~1~ delcri~d pro~rty: ~t ~06, Tract ~t~ Club, Tug3~ X, according to the P~at thereo~, recorded P2mt ~k 13, Page ~07 or the ~b3lc Recordm of CoA3Jer C~t~, r3ort~. PJ~r Mu~here exp]ml~d thai ~tltlon Am requesting a variance Afl or~r to cout~ct a duplex co~lmtent An architectural deol~ otherm iff Tract H or t~ ~y C~t~ C2ub ~D. He orated the mubJect pro~rty lo off a corner Jot m~ t~ PUD d~ment requires a 30 met~ck a3~ afl~ pro~rty a~ttJ~ t~ right-st-way. Ho laid this, a3o~ MAth t~ o~ or the lot, preventt the ~titloner trim dive- lopl~ this ~rce~ uatng mn architectural theme and laze consistent ulth ot~r ~eJo~flt Afl t~ area. He re.fred t~t Ster~ ~l ti)archly rnl~d all ~ta regirdl~ thio ~tlti~. He tht ~d off tb fact t~t a ~rdihlp mm~clmted MAth the 1~ ~t ~lit, Staff la recom~Jng this variance ~ denied. He added t~ ~K has al~ recom~ d~lal of thio r~eet ~ a vote of 5/1. ~mlmmJo~r vol~ asked l~ the ~tJtJoner reducel the maze, b b able to c~it~ct a ~lex coulltent with the architectural ~ ~. ~bre itat~ a ~pl~ c~ ~ cmtmct~, ~t part of the archlt~t~al tbM lo the iize ~ al~ t~ ~rketablllty or the ~: t~A 1dAng. Den Beatt7 stated the i~etitAonmr ha~ no plmnm to tmiId m miler Ssptsaber ~5, 1~90 duplex, lie added neither of the two homeowners associations ara opposed to this variance. cml, tied ummlmmmly, to c]ooe the Imbllc bearing. and em-riM ~~ly, to ~ ~lt~ V-~12. ~ms fllnnero, representing Florida Affordable Housing, Inc., e~]a~ned his Comp~fl~ 1o e non-profit cor~ratlon ~hose ~r~oe deve]opl~ affordable housing for 3~ to ~erate Jnco~ ~rk~ng h~oe~Jdt. He laid dur]~ the ~st t~ years, his Core. ny has ~en the ~et ~cceesful d~el~r of ~ch h~1ng An the Stats of Florida, ~v]~ ~el~d five co~1t~e~ contalnlng 916 affordable apartment ~1te. He added three of t~ee co~nltie= have child cars center~. Be Anfor~d t~y ~ve ~en e~rsed ~ Atfor~ble H~aing Flor/da, Inc. He dlepll~ r~r]~l of the ~Jldingg pro.ged to ~l/t ~ 41~ p~t~raphl of a project t~C ~o ~en comp/eted. et~ted hl~ Company 1~ f~J~ed to retaJn ~erehAp of t~e d~elo~ ~nte for at le~t 15 ye4~ u~er the FlorA~ pr~raa t~t t~ In ~i/dlng the units. ~erefore, he said, t~ are very lntereet~ 1n high ~allt~ conit~ctlon t~t wlll continue to look ~ ~ e~ure. ~ mr to Co~llsloner Vol~, Hr. HI.ere replied t~t all la.ct Z~e ~re waived for the dnelo~nt his Co~ny klr~ kuh. ~: ~leel~r Vol~ ~ntloned t~t according to the ~1M to t~ ~4rd, the pro~t~ dnelo~nt on l~lee ~ld ~t a coep]ete waiver of J~ct fees at a cost of rely ~(35,~ to the C~ty. He laid alt~gh t~ ~ard Is certainly In ~rt of if retable ~lng, ~ Is conce~ ~lth t~t fl~re. Page 60 September 25, 1990 ~r. lilnnars indicated those figures a~y b~ too high. lie s~ld hi. 315,~0 for Cites Glen. In res~n~ to Coulssloner Vol~, Mr. Hlnners stated the d~elop a~ts ~ld ~ ~llt at 12.~4 units per acre. He ~aid, If appr~ed, th~ will ~ receiving a density ~us of 5.84 un, ts ~r acre. ~lsslo~r Vol~ stated t~t Florida lffor~ble H~slng, Inc., ne~ ~ s~ of su~rt fr~ Collier C~nty In order to patriciate t~ ~1~ ~ pr~ras. H~ ,eked If t~ density ~nus ~ln9 9r*nted ~111 ~ nfflclent to ~llfy? Nr. ~lmers replied In the Ifflrutlve, ~t add~ the sal~ Is a co~tltlve process. Ne said ~hls Is ~he third year of Its existence a~ ~ach y~ar, It ~s tik.~ ~r~ to prevail In the coepetltlon. ~e si.ted t~re ar~ t~ r.~m his Cosp~y Is requestln~ ~lver of l~ct f~s: 1} they f~l It ~111 ~ ~ecessary to prevail In the cos~tltlv~ process; ~nd ~) It Is necessary to flnanc~ th~ project. Ee re~rt~ t~y are prying to rent the units at al~st ~200 ~l~ t~ ~rket rate of rent, which -Ill result In over ~300,000 ~r year In lost lnco~. In order to do t~t, he said, they -111 need aeeist~e fr~ ~th t~ l~al and State g~e~nts. C~ty Attorney Cuyler ~vlsed the ~ard has already established tbr~h Its l~ct fee ordl~nces, t~ p~ocees ~ ~Jch d~elo~re ~y obtain ~ai~rl to i~ct fas. Comisslo~r Vol~ ask.d If th~ ~t[tloner ~lll ne.d to r~quest t~se w. ivers ~er the various exlstl~ ordl~nces, to which C~nty ltto~ ~ler repli~ In the affimttve. It m t~ c~senm to contl~ this ltes to t~ r~lar ~ard ~tl~ of Octo~r 2, 1990. Fr~ B~tt~ Co~nlty ~velo~nt ~e~lces A~lnlstr. tor, r~rt~ this Is · r~est to consider A waiver of the Surety ~ to 123 Page 61 gepte~ber 25, 1990 entertaJn~nt to the couunSty Jn the ~orm o~ s circul per- by Clyde Be&tty-Co2e Brotherl CJr~e, ]nc. ~e c~c]qd~ the Club of laplel ~l ~en ,~ring this circe since 1981, all 000,-' 4 Septambel* 25, !ggo 8rutt Informed tl~t voters agreed to tax themselves for the firs districts, ot~r than ~lden Gate. He said ,,;remnto are on ~nd with all of the fire districts ~d the cantr~to ~ve ~en r~l~ed ~ the C~ntv Attack's Office. co~l~ ~t~ff Is retain9 th~ ~r~ ~ut~rlz~ its O~l~n to ~ c~trsctm to ~Qln collecting lire District l~act fees. ~ly, ~ ~ ~ %nterl~l ~t f~ t~ 155 ~a~ Reardon, Emergency Services Administrator, presented this lte. ,,high ~a~ continued from the ~etJng og Au~t 28, 19~0. He .aid a r-~o~tJon ~a~ pre~ented at that ~eeting to ~rchase a .obiie com- ~nd ~t to replace t~ existing vehicle, ~hich I. 16 year~ old. At ~h~t ti., ~ ~tated, ~$tJo~ oQtion~ ~ere pro~ed and the ,~$rect~ Stagf ~ the Co. ittee to revJ~ those options and re.ri '~ck at th$~ ~etJng. A~ a reau[t of the evaluation by the Co~tttee, the reco~tJon reuJn~ to ~rchase the n~ vehicle. H~ever, ~ed, t~ Committee augge~t~ the vehicle ~ purchased through a fou~ 7~ar ]e~e/~rc~ee egree~nt in ~ a~nt not to exceed $68.500 ]nc=e~ t~ project ~ I13.~35. ~t u, ing thie aethod wl[i ~he re~t~ oi lu~de already ~dgeted tot thie project to ~ io~a~i into t~ next ilecal yea~. ~e eali thie ~y ~ neceaea~ to con,ate Jot t~ exacted ehortia]~ ot ~150.000 to accomt, the ~he~tit~e p~o~,ed ~dget. le ,eked ~o~ an u~mte on the p,chge option ~. ~ardon amid t~ p~ote~t la ,tiII undeci~d, but the ex~c- t.~tl~ ie it ~lil ~ mettled with the ~e~uit ol ~ ~eduction tn the co~t fo= t~ ~to ~ckage. ~tlelo~r aasae maked ~ the ~ney I, In the budget. ~hy not ~ay ~o~ t~ vehicle ~. ~a=~ e~lained that the last time thte item ~e t~e m ~h diacu,~ton regarding ~lancing the ~dget. ~e eaid thJe Je t~ ~et ~ay to offe~ the ~a~d optione to help mego]ye t~t i~ 84 · eptenbe~ ~8, r~-rl~iw leeee/~ ngz~m~mt ~n in mt not to exceed $61,800 ~ ~ ~CEZY~D T~ CLEI~ TO BOAKD OFFICE 000,,,,. 18i Septamber 25, 1990 Bill Lorenz, Krr~lrorm~ntal ~e~vlces Admtnietrator, explained that t~o mk~ ego, t~e ~ard ask~ Staff to evaluate the two alternatives ~c~ vm c~tractu% N~Jcem for a tire mhreddtng qmte.. ~e ~id thJl ira II tW r~lt o[ a r~rt of a~lyslm t~t was done on ~Jc ~*uib$lS~ of t~N t~ alternatJvem, not onl~ for tire - fi~tl~ t~t ~lm tm I c~im $t~ to the fail--trig two ttem~, Lorenz reported that contractual ~ervlces are ~ch ~re cost for shrWI~ tl~e t~ ~rc~l~ the t~t t~ h~ ~, to Mke m decimt~ ve~ ~lckly ~nty la In ~er of ~1~ In r~lato~ n~-c~pltance t~ ~rtmt of ~vl~tal ~latlm (DER) due to .the a~unt of are et~kplled~ ~ 2) a ~ste tire grant ~t ~ obtal~ If · cmltmt la ~t ~th. Lorenz continued that the other conclusion of the report, ~g~rdl.n~ ehreddl~ of bio~s0 Indicated that the cost analysis was ton mmld he soe~,dmt higher th~n an Initial assessment of Stl.~0 for p~rch~e of e~l~ipm~nt, l~:~ver, he stated there are m~ny ,1~ wl~ r~ar4 to ~c~l of t~t e~l~nt tn terns of ..' t~t ee ~ An t~ ecoalc a~lysle, In addition to uncertainties of proJectin~ biosmss quantitt# in t~ ~xt five to~j~'~ ~ ~xt year for pr~elil~ biases; obtain the needed with ~l~ to ~i~t ~rfo~ce; obtain e of bom the proJection~ of baobabs ~ork out to the next irs sufficient tau for next m ooo ls Page 66 September 25, 1990 In answer to Commissioner Volpe, David Russel, Solid Naste l~par~nt Supervisor, replied that references have been checked con- cernl~ the con. ny ~lng pro.sad for tire shredding services. He said this firm has done business ~tth both Dads and Bro~ard Counties to t~ satisfaction o~ ~th those com~nlttes. He concluded Staff coati.es to fecund the C~nty enter Into a contract ~lth Ttr~.~on. [i~ ~el~eer, General ~nager o~ ~aste ~anege~ent of Collier C~lnty, stated his Company re~nded to the R~ [or the tire se~tces ~lth a prlc~ of ~77.25 ~r ton. ge said that ~aa partially predicated on · question regarding the tires coslng onto the ~hat contaai~ts they night contain In r~gards to aetals and ho~ might i~ct the e~lp~nt. He asked that his Coapany be al lo~ed a vl~l Ins~ctlo~ of the tires aM l~ they are clean and do not pre- s~t a ~zard to the equlp~nt, the ~77.25 per ton ~ay be reduced. H.. concl~d this ~111 all~ the County to contract ~tth a local company ~tth reco~$zed stability and ell~l~t~ the concern raised regardlr~9 t~t C~t7 Attor~ Cuyler advised that ~l I 1 Jeopardize the bldd Irt9 pr~ese a~ c~t ~ ~ne. ~r. ~elieer r~ln~d t~ ~ard t~t the original pro.esl rele~ed the right ot the County to accept any pro~sal deemed to be i~ t~ ~lt interests of t~ County and also stipulated that any and all pro~eall ~y ~ rejected and the RFP ~ re-advertised. He -.aid It al~ included th~ first selection factor as being a proven of ex~rtiee, fie comnted price Il a factor, but is not the Co~tislo~r S~~ communicated he continues to have concerns r~ardl~ Tlregon, ~htch has ~en In bu~tnes~ [or less than oas year. ~ ~id t~ references relate to an Individual ~ho. ~hen the ~ork ~a.~ ~rtO~, MU eaployed ~ a different coapany. ~rt ~, Director of the Solid ~aste Departle~t, advised this l~lvidul ~ ~en a sub-contractor in Br~ard County and has ~ ~r~ a contract tn ~ County. ~e added the contract .lth September 25, 1990 this Coapany can be cancelled within 15 days if the tires are not shredded to the appropriate size. He reported Staff will also be Investigating durlag the next year, whether the County should itself b~ processing the tires. Comisstoner Volpe asked who the vendor ts proposed to be for the blow,ass operation? Mr. Fahe~ responded that N. R. Associates, Inc. of Boynton Beach is the pro~sed vendor. ~e ~tated the object Is to reduce the so that ~e~thtng processed through that -/chinery ts t~o Inches less In size. He Indicated that ~ervlce ~[11 be provided at S13.90 ~r t~. Re said the material will then ~ provided to citizens for their use, at no cost. He advised the residues that the County doe~ ~t give a~ay, ~l]] ~ kept on site afl cosset. He stated this al~o a one year contract and Staff ~ill ~ utilizing this tiao to dateline ~hether the County should proceed ~ith purchase of equtpm,,nt or continuation o[ contractual ~ervlce~. ~l~i~r Vol~ ~, ~c~d ~ C~tasloner ~tght and ~ig ~imlT, to alrect Staff to ~tmr Into c~tractal ~r- vim to ~/~s ttr~ mt a cat ~t to ~ce~ ~4e ~r t~ and bi~ at a ~t ~t to ~ ~S3.~ ~r t~. ~id a~ly, to M~ t~ hims ~cli~ c~tract to pro- lt~ ~ ~~~~~~~_~4e.0o ~ ~ ~et~r ~o~ ~. eec~ ~ ~ee~r ~Jght and ~t~ ~ ~ ~t ~t to ~e~ ~4a.O0 ~r ton. Page 68 September 25, 1990 ~zew~ Pm ~xwr~u~c~ ~xma com-nu~-r ~~ To mx~ ~o. ~0-x~s~ ~~ ~ ~, x~,, Z~,,~ ~ o~ ~~ ...... Tom Conrecode, Director of Capital ProJect~ Management, report~ Bid No. 90-1538 -as o~ned on April 11, 1990, roll--lng Invitation 33 contractors. He ~ald after revi~ ~ Staff and the consulting engineer, ~ta~[ 1~ recommending the contract be awarded to Energy Re~rce~, Inc., tn th~ a~unt of E~l~y ~gqlo r~called that when the funding for Wl~gln~ ~alnte~nce dred~lnq was determined, tt w~ to b~ 50X from voluntary co~trl~tlon~ and 5OX fro~ boater registration fees. She stated was ~]~o decided that the 50X fro~ boater re~tstration would have cap of 9100,0OO ~cau~ of the County's commitment of tho~e In the Or--th ~anaq~ent Plan for construction of ~at ra~p~. She al~o ~tloned that the c~anion to ~hl~, Ite~ ~qH6, 1~ a request ~IO5,BOO fro~ the NIGglne Pa~ Con~e~ancy, which agreed to fund 5he ~ald the bid for thl~ contract 1~ for ~218,890, The ~ndl~u A~r~e~nt for ~l~Ulns Pa~ Halntenanc~ Dredging, ~he pointed out, te~ total project co.t~ are e~tl~ted to be In the a~ount of ~he questioned what th~ ~105,~OO 1~ 50~ ~r, Conrecod~ explained th~ ~285,800 1~ ~ total co~t for the pro- Ject. ~e eald th~ Voluntar? Contribution [ro~ Nl~uln~ Con~ervancy 1~ for the dredging, not the englneerlr~q ~tud[e~ or the · u~ent Inlet ~n~e~nt Co~l~loner Volpe a~d ~here will the additional revenues be obtal~d? Mr. Conrecode re~nded the new tourist tax will fund all eub- ~nt ~rk, once the initial dredglnD 1~ completed. Co~l~lo~r S~nahan ~tated the tourt~t tax will provide for fmt~re M lntenance ~t doe~ r~ot cover the $~7,000 difference betwee~ the bid of $21~,890 and total contract co~t of $285,800. ~tlo~d ~ere the difference .11~ ~ funded? ~l~tant County ~na~er Mc~re ~u~ge~ted the ~ard approve t~e 185 PaQe 69 September 25, 1990 contract in order to get the project under way, and him Staff will investigate further a source of additional financing. Commissioner Saunders commented the records need to researched, ~d if it is determined that there la a cap of $100,000 tn terms of the County Contribution, that should be adhered to. Colmlssloner Mhanahan noted that Kxhlbtt A of Item ~9M6 clarifi~-f; that th~ permitting co, ts, final design and construction plans, and service durtng construction total $67,000 and will be budgeted within ~ 304. A representative s~aklng for Mr. Johnstone Indicated the only reference that co~it~ the County to 50~ of the funding ts a letter from County ~anager ~rrlll written In 1988. Me said that letter clflcally stated the e~tt~te for the dredging was approximately ~300,000 and the County would fund half of that amount. He lnform~d that previous Voluntary Comtrt~tlonm In the amount of 53T,100 ~en credited, leaving the reminder of ~105,800 as the balance ex~cted froe that source. Me explained tho~e funds are belr~9 escr~ and cammot be dlabur~ed without a certificate of complet lom. Commissioner Saundera commented he I~ concerned ~lth wh~t the financial arrange~nta were when this commitment was made. He rtqueeted that the County ~nager check the record to en~ure that County la paying ~hat was agreed u~n Initially. ~lsi~ VoI~ ~, ~~ ~ C~lmml~r S~ and ~i~ ~l~ly, t~t Bid No. 90-1t38, Wiggins Piss hlnt~nce ~~, ~ ~ to ~r~ ~rce8, I~., In t~ ~t of ~211,1~. Its~ ~ ~, l~., --tabltmht~ 1100,800 as t~ total ~t of Vol~t~ ~trl~tl~ r~lrg to ~at~ t~dt~ for the ~lgglnm 188 · ~1)t~mb~ 2~, 1990 187 September 25, 1990 ~~l~t~&ltDIl~ T~ TO~TRIST TAX - JkDOPT~D __ County Attorney Cu°/ler reported this resolution ts a request for a col~y of the names and addresses of the taxpayers ~tranted a State of Florida ~part~nt of R~enue Certificate of Registration for tax on 8alee, use and other transactions. He .aid thl~ is nece~sary for the Tax Collector to adslnister and collect the Tourist Development Tax. ~tg ~~11, tMt l~lutta 90-467 ~ ~opt~ rpstl~ tu ~fatl~ f~ t~ ~rt~t o~ ~ rqartt~ t~ lariat Iu. 195 Page 72 September 25, 1990 Authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution authorizing final acceptance. Authorize the release of the maintenance security. 1. The water facllltie~ to ~rve th~ proJec~ cannot be placed Into .ervlc- and no C~rtlficat~ of Occu~)ancy ~hall be Issll~d ontll the Florida Department of ~nvlronm~.tal ~egulatlon fur- service, and; 2. Bact.rlol~ical testing has ~t th. Co~mty'$ requirements, and; 3. ~e Fire Flow requirements of the proJ.ct have been eatisfi~d, and the Fire District furnlshe~ a letter accepting the fire hydrator f~r ownership and ~aint~nance. OR I~ook_1563 Page~ 1972 - 1980 ~11~ ~ ~ ,~XLXTX~ ~CC~PT&I[C~ I~OR C~k~DLEW~OD - WlT~ lq~ ~'V~O~_ __ 4 ° No Certificate of Occupancy shall be l~sued until the Florida Department of Environmental R.gulat ion furnishes a letter placing the sewer sy,~tem Into ~ervice, and; The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a l~tt~r approving tha wa~r distribution sys~am for s~rvic~ a~ tha bacteriological t~stln~ has s~t th~ County's r~quire- ~nts, and; ~e Fire Dlstrlc~ furnishes a letter accepting ~erahip and ~lntenance of fire hydrants and the fire flow reguire~ent~ are satisfied. ~e Plat ~ok and page number lnfor~tion for the record*~d plat la incorporated In the legal docum-nt~. [l~L_~ "L3K,! RISORT, PIIAS! 11?RA~" - FLTH 1. Authorize the recordin~ of the Final Plat o~ "Lely Resort, 2 o Prior to final SDP approval for Tract 20, the water nanage- merit plan for the drainage basin that this site Is situated In shall receive Water Management Advisory Board approval in accordance with the PUD document, unle~n the South Florida Water Management District allows the nits to temporarily ,~,.;, the Lely ~esort Pha~e I water management gygtem for ~torag,.. The water manafje~nt ~y~tem to ~ :rvr, Tract 20 ,~hall be approved prior to final SDP for Tract 20 and receive p_r_.~_.I i;ni- nary acceptance prior to any Certificate~ of Occupancy within Tract 20 unless the South Florida Water Management Dlstrlc~ allc~ws construction of Tract 20 temporarily utilizing the Lely Re~ort Pha.~e I water ~nage~ent syste~ for storage. Accept the Conqtructlon/Maintenance/Escrow Agreement as eecurity to guarante~ conpletlon of the Subdivision laprovemente. Authorize the r~.cordlng of th~ final plat of "Vi llage.n of Monterey at ~oodbrldge, Unit Four". Authorize th~ Chairman to execute the Construction/ Ma intenance/E~crow Agreement, 4o That no Certiflcateo of Occupancy be granted until the required lspr,~ve~ent~ have received preliminary acceptant-. ~'~og ~o-4sg o'~ur~z~o ~Lz~z~un' ACC=~.~C~ Or THE ROAm4AY, ~_~~~f__-___~g._ln~_ .. _~r!.~? !_P~ ........................................... Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit (posted with th~ Clerk) as security for I~alntfnanc~ of th,? lnfrastructur~ un~ll the Board of County Commlosloner~ grants final accep-- lance of all Improvements. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Resolution autho£1z',,,g pre 1 la lna~-t acceptance. Preliminary acceptance of lmprovemente will not become eff,:c- tlve until water and aewe, r facilities have been conveyed to Collier County Water-Sewer Did, trier. See Page Ztom hCCl:IP/JdlCl OI~ SLCVIITY /~OR EXCAVATION PIIO4I? I0. ~,9.395 "SAPPHIRK Lllll 0111' Oil', [/)CllID II S[.~'TIOI 33, TOWIISHZP 49 SOOTH, RAIIOK 26 000,,;. 200 Page 74 Septenber 25, 1990 AC~E~T~ OF ~CU~ITT I~R E~CAVATIOW PERMIT NO. 59.400 'VILLAGES OF ~ U~I! 5', ~)CAT~D IN $[%'TIOR 2, TO%~$HIP 49 $OU~H, RANGE 25 mm OCO,,:... 201 ~ ~ ~ c~m s~mo:mm ~Ao~ sg~crs com~o~ ,,.,. ~,,~ .... _ .... ~.7=__.~_~ It~ ~1414 ~~~~ ~_._~R._~__~__~__~ l ~, 9!~ ..................... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CI~ OF NA~KS AIRART ~I~, ~I~ ~I~S ~R A ~DXFICATION OF ~g C~K~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I~S DIVISIOM"S ~I~AMCK, ~O~GE AND ~l~ ~470 ~llO ~ COLLIER C~ ~CL~ CIVIL ~~ September 25, 1990 iaIrZBIrr II'TWI:EH CO~LZI~ COux'rY iJrD THZ STATE O~ FCORZOA ozP&X'nqzx'r Item ~14~4 z~w~r~ ~ ~o aXOm4AV PAVZ:XS, xwc.0 J~cx q~gw cows?., zxc., C::~X~ ~"r~o~IZ~D TO APPItOV~ TN~ R~F~CTCLING AND EIX~CATXOM (~JARTL~tLY s~,, ,~. ...~/~- ~,~.-d, September 25, 1990 90--471 OIR~CTTIlO ~T/dlT TO l:q~R30~ ~ CR~ATI01~ 01~ A S~RV/CT:S TJO[IIIG 0~IT FOR ~ RAMXSRIDG~ ~ PRO3~CT TO See Page ,,.~O~ 7 T~ follcr~ln~ ml~c,;.llan~ou~ corre,~pondence w~,~ ~Ii~d and/or referred to the varlooq d~p.~rt"`~.nt~ &~ indicated b~Iow: 1. Notice to Potential Applicants for 1900-01 Litter Prevent Orants from the Clean Florid,, CommlB~lon. Cople~ to ~rrlll, Bob Fah~y, ~nd filed. [.ett~r dated 8/~I/00 from Joan D. ~enn, A~'t. Dlr~ctr~r, Admlnl,tratlon, Collier Mosquito Control District, to of the Board, Ja=e~ C. Giles, ~lth ~ncloqur~ for Iii,s: C~rtlfl~d B**d~t - 1990-ql. Copy to Mlk~ ~r:Nee~, and Letter dated 0/7/90 from Ronald Davi~, Chief, Bureau r~: Co=~unlty D~v-lopm~nt Block Grant {CDRG}, Contract ~umb~r 90DB-49-O~-21-OI-HO5. Copl~q to N*~I I Dorrl I 1, St,.'~, Letter dnted 8/0/00 from Virgil L. Choat~, Correctional Officer Inepector Il, Department of Corrections, to 8/{/90. Copt lo }tell Dorrlll and Letter dated 8/9/90 from Virgil L. Cho~,te, Correctional Officer Inspector II, Department of Corrections, to Sheriff Hunter and Chairman Saundera re: In~q,+.ct Ion Report 8/7/90. Cop'/ to N~[1 Dorr[ll, and Letter dated 9/10/90 fro-, Jori M. Iglehart, Environmental Specialist, Department of Environmental Pegulatlon, Chair~n re Collier County - ~R, Fil,~ No. 111860055. Copies to ~ell ~rrill, Frank Bruit, Bill Lorenz, and filed. Letter dated O/lO/q0 from Jori M. Igl~h~,rt, Environmental S~clallst, D~p~rt~nt o~ [nvironn~nt~l Regulation, to Chalr~n re Collier County - WHR File No. 111850425. to ~ell Dorrtll, Frank 8rutt, Bill Lorenz, ~nd fll*d. Notice of Proposed Eule~aklng dated 8/24/00, NotIc~ of Work.hop at~d Notice of Public Meeting d4ted 9/6/90, to In ~he 8/24/90, 8/31/90 and 9/7/00 Florida Week,.1y. Copies to Nell Dorrill, Frank Bruit, Bill Lorenz, and f ~ led. 000 PI'.[ 2~ Pag,.' 77 September 25, 1900 [~tter dated 9/10/90 [roi Gary D, Lytton, Nanager, Rookery Bay Rational Estuarlne Research Reserve, Department of Matural Resources, to Chalraan Saunder~ Inviting him to the Third Annual *Estuary Day" celebration on g/15/90. Filed. 10. Letter dated g/7/90 from Diane C, Rogowski, Planner II, Bureau of Land ~anage~_nt Services, Division of State Land~, Department of Natural Resources, to Chairman Ha~e re: 7~;;~! Easement Ro. 0012B(3955-11). Copies to Nell Dorrl]l, Fr;,r,;' Brutt, Bill Lorenz, and flied. 11. Cop*/ to BCC of letter dated 9/6/90 from Tony D. McN~al, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering and Regulation. Departm~.nt of Natural Resources to Todd T. Turrel 1, P.E. , Consulting Engineering, re: Admlnt~trativ~ Approval of Modiftcmt ion, P~-rmlt Number: CO-20g ATF M1 CF, Permitt~',- N~me: Indies West Asmoclmtion. Copies to Nell Dorrlll, Frank Bruit, Bill Lorenz, and flied. 12. Co[~7 to BCC of letter dated 9/14/90 from Darrell W. Smith, Ad~lntntrator, Planning and Budgeting, Department of lo Honorable Guy Carltnn, Collier County Tax collect, or, revle~ of t;udg~t request for the operation of Mr. of[ice. Copies to ~ell Dorrlll, ~lke McH~es, and filed. 13. t,etter dated 9/14/q0 from M. R. Trefz, P.E,, Dlstrict 3ecretary, D-.partment of Tran.sDortatlon, to Chairman r~: R~qu~nt far Int~rchang~ Information, 1-75 and Boulevard, Colll.r Count'/. Cople~ to Nell Dorrlll, Archlb.~ld, Bill L~r~nz. Frank Bruit, and rll*,d. 14. NeIO dated ')/13/90 from Peter M;~ Transporta~ Ion kdmlnl~trat Ion, U.S. Dep.~vtm~nt of Trans~rtatlon, to All Section 9 Grant~ r,-: Financial S'atus Peport~ (For~ ~F 269A). Yonko~ky, George Archibald, and fllod. 15. Hlnute~ Received and Filed: Collier Co,inty Nom,~les. Advisory Commltt.e Aoendas f ,c 7/I~/~0, 9/1~/90 and 10/10/90. Ochopee ~lre Control District Advl~or¥ ~oard Meetln9 Minutes of 5/7/90. Narco Island Beautification Committee Agenda for 9/11/90. Pace/Steering Coamlttee Mlnut~.s of 9/7/90. Collier Co,lr~t'/ P14nning C~mml-~slon Ager~da ['or 9/20/')~. F. wat,r Mar:ag.~ment Advisory Board Agendii for 9/12/90. 16. I'~otlce To Owner dated 9/'//90 to BCC, Better Roads, Inc. T&5 Utllitl~ (C~-rtlfied Letter ~P 147 115 441) from Highw.~Y Pavers, inc., ~,dvl~ln9 they have furnished the following ~terlals under an ordf~r given by TbS Utilities: Sand, ','; Stone, Stab tot the slx-lanlng of Airport Rr)~d. Copl~ Nell Dorrill, Steve Carnell, John Yonko~ky, dnd filed. &i'l'i~{~t~ {~I~ELL ~. SCHItOPP AI~D ~ATTHEW D. UHLK BIRID TO SERVE iS ~ O{'[ICllt~ TO DmlI[ ~ RIGFI~ PUWSUA{rl' TO ~ ZONING NIE-~ILI.~iTIO~ O{[DINA{~'~ AIgD ADEQUAT~ P~BLIC FACILITIES ORDINANCE; ~Uu~rrr__~__ __~..__ _3~...~Oq'J~ ~_ATz ~ c0~nu~c'rs .... September 25, 1990 llprcrved )~lll t)~ exempt. ee. It~c~. at 6:30 P.M. to go Into Specta! SemmJon - Reconvmned T~ ~ lt~ Co,mid, loner ~oodnfgbt communlcat~d hPr appr~clat lr)~ for a.ll~ed the opportunity to ad~ this Item ~o the agenda. She explained tl~at recently, zoning rP-evaluat ion letters ~re a~nt out to the entire County and ~ny property ~ners ~ho have ~en a¢~ect, ed by the letters are ~rom ChoEolon~ee, Plantation, CopeIand and the surrounding area~ She Indicated ~he ha~ b~n attPm[)tlng to wor~ w~th start g~ttlng an lnterpretatlr)n of th~ rezonlng to occur In those areas. She referred to a queqt Ion qbe ralqed during the Board meeting o~ G/6/88 regarding mobile ho~n, not all~lng ne~ zoning for mobile ho~m and not all~lng mobile home. to be replaced. She stated she ~a. told at that t l~, that thlm ordlnanc~ would apply only to new zoning, She added, ho~ever, that nothing ha~ been resolved regarding mobile hombre becaune the Board did not tak~ a ~tand on th~ Indue at re'xolved around d~no[t./ ~,r,-I n~.rvlc- 1,,v~In. gh~ nt~lt~d ,,lthough ~nmlt% In that ~rea lm high, th~ ~ervlc~ lev~lm of th~ roads even ~lld-out ~ould n~v~r Qo b~lr~ ~h~lr currmnt l~velm. She ~ald Plan ~hlch ~ould take one ,/ear or ~ore; 2) ~m~nd th*. Zoning ~aluatlo~ Ordinance ~hlch ~ould tak~ possibly three to ~our ~r)nths; $} direct ~taff to interpret the ordinance In the ~ay ~he originally w~ led to under~tand; l) co~unltl~ to ~o through the zoning exemp- tion proce~ ~hlch ~ould f~ll under t~o dl~rent tl~eline~; and 5) give · bl~nket exemption for ~11 v~cant parc~l~ tha~ ~r~ Inconsistent 81ze or coapatlbtllt,/; the parcels that have mobile homeu or are She a~ked the Board for direction for the 000.::205 Page 7g S~-ptember 25, 1990 p~opl~ in this area and for St&ff. Commissioner Volpe commented that the l{sue seems to be on~ o~ tlainG. He asked If there l~ somethin~ other than that issue by which tha ~ard can accommodate the concern~ of ~es]dents In the affected area? Co~liiloner ~oodnl~ht indicated the ~ain concern Is ~ question timing, She re~rt,~ thi~ i~ averV depr-,~ed area and l~ the ~oard holde back even one buildinG permit, It will have an affect on the entlr~ area. She maid Gr~th i~ needed in that a~ea in order t.o finance water ~ymtem~, ~choolm, etc. Co~lsmloner Volpe a~ked If there In a way to commit resources to ~x~dit~ applicatlonn for exempt Ion by remld~nt~ In thl~ area? Gr~th P]annin~ Director Blanr:hard replied ~hat ~taff time has mpp]lcatlo~. He ~aid th~ deter~$nation ha~ been that the maJorlt'/ ~or an up-~ron~ exempt ion or for a compatibility determination. eaid ~at o~ the prop~rt lee would almo quali~y In Copeland. He re.fred he hae o~er~f~ to tak~ a ein~Ie exemption application and a can ~x~dlte the proce.~, h~.v~r, ther~ ii much Jimunderstandlng at Co~l~ioner 5aundera Indicated hl~ b~li~f In the integrity of th~ ~yst$~ that ha~ been dev~lo~d for zoninG r~-evaluat Ion, and he ~are of rh~ ~tentl~l problem~ that. cda be Generated for the Comprshensive Plan and the Zonln9 Re-evaluation Ordinance i~ the County Is not careful about how 1~ Is dpplied. He said Mr. Blanchard ~s stated that ~st pro~rtles on Plantation and Chokoloskee would · lth~r ~ ~xempt up fron~ or would have a compatibility exception, and tMt ~st of the propertle~ ir, Cop~lnnd would be ~xempt. H,- It am Mt seem to ~ necessary for these areas to have to Go through tha procmss when the outcome Is already clear. He suG~(~uted that the Board rec~nlze that It wa5 not the Intention to Include Plantation, 000,,:, 208 P~{Je 80 September 25, 1990 ChokoJos~ee and Cope]arid in the Zoning Re-evaluation Ordinance. He also prol>o~ed to direct Staff to a~end the Zoning Re-evaluation Ordinance to reflect that. Commissioner Vo]pe comaun~cat.d he doeffi not know tha~ the intent of the ordin~nce wa~ %o no% include these three areas. Co~i~aloner Goodnlght ~tat.d that J~ th~ problem. SN. r-Iterated she asked that question of Mr. Gauthler a' the time the ordinance was ~form the ~ard in 1988, and was told that the EverGlades area would W exempt for ~everal reagong: the mobile home~ are already there; the density would not be affected because they cannot ~row any further ~m]uatlon and mo.t of the prt~i.lon~ of the Comprehenslv,~ Plan, did not Intend requlrln9 the Everglade9 area to be ~ubJect to the precisions as th~ urban th- Or--th Han~g-m.nt Pl.n cor, t~ln . policy wh. ret, y thor..ould be alliance for any new plac.n~nto of ~bll. hommq or mobile hom~ park~. Ne said that lm the ,:ont.xt for this dl.cuqBion, not in context of any lumtlon. He maid there are processes built Into th- Zoning ~e- stated ~he~e three area~ are designated as urban on the Growth ~ge~nt Plan and are .ubJect to all the density rat lng systems. colnicated they are also ~ubJect to Policy 3.IK which states there will ~ no n~'~ d.velop~,-r~t ,~r,i,.r,~ lncor~l~t,.nt with th*~ Growth Co~lssloner 5h~nahan asked If the Zoning Re-evaluation Ordinance Is ~ed to exemp~ thi~ area, how long will 1~ t.ke to resolve the t swue? B OCO,,-.: 207 9eptember 25, 1990 )ir. Blanchard respa)haled the ordinance can be amended possibly Commissioner VoIp~ questioned ~hat a~ount of time ~ouId be ~ece~ar'/ l~ the resource~ are co~m[tted to process the appl ~cation~ Mr. Blanchard replied the up-front exemption cam be completed ~lthln om~ week onc~ thp appllcat lom~ are received. He said the com- ~lth the Gr~th ~anape~ent Plan until the Plan amendment Is adopted, ~hlch cannot take place until ~an~ary. Co~lsstoner Has~e asked h~ ~ny applications ~111 ne~d to be processed? Hr. Blanchard stated If 5t~ff r~c~ive~ a singl~ appltcatlon with ~otarlz~d stgnature~ authorizing ~o~one to ~ct for all the property ~ers, tt can bo processed v~ry quickly. He explaln*?d If t;iken separately, there ~111 be mor~ tha~ 200 appllcatloa~ to process: 61 for ~x~Iption~ and 67 lolq for cospatlblllty ~xceptlon~ Choko 1 osk~. H~rold Hall, Admtnlntr~tiv~ Coordinator for Zverglades City, expr~ased the appreciation of re~ldent~ In the Kverglade~ City area for the op~rtunlt'/ to air their concern~ on ~uch short not lc~. He stated the laconsl~tenc,t as ~een by resldent~ of that ared, Is that thai do not need a decreaae In d,~nslt'/, they need art increase. He s~ld t~ pro~ed zonln9 r~-evaluatlon for this area Is a tremendous ~n~ a~ moon a~ f~lble. He indicated going through the process only prolongs the hurt ~lng Inflicted on these communities. He stated he has ~t with Staff on frequent occasions and they have been coo~rative, but he die, agrees with their interpretation. Hi: ~ald the mm September 25, 1990 letters should never been sent out to resldent~ In the~e three areas. Be added he ham spoken with several members of the Cltlzen~ Advisory Committee aL well as membere of the Coastal Area Planning Commi~eion who have all agreed there wa~ never an intention to reduce the density ~n the Everglades area. Com~missioner Saunders commented that all members of the Board have indicated their wtllingne~ to work out this issue. He stated it now becomes a ~tter of h~ ]t can be done. H- propo.ed the Board make a stmtement at th]a meetinG, that the intent wa~ not to include Chokolomkee, Plantar ion and Cope]and ]n th. Zoning Re-eva]uat ~on OrdJna~ace. Me a]~o ~,]~e~ted that ~taff be directed to expedite an m~nd~nt to the Zoning ~e-.va]uat ~o~ Ordinance for that one purpose. Co~i~s$oner Vo]pe rear,ed [hat ~f the problem ]~ interpretation of the Zoning ~.-.va]uation Ordinance, and the Board ~ ~tat inG that the ordtn.nc- may n~,t b~ n-ce--ary. H. rotated he l. r. luctant to County Attorn.y Cuyl.r ~tat.d the Board need- to commit to [den- ttfyl~ a m~clttc pur~me ~nd re~on~ for a~ling the Ordinance, He amid t~ ~ard ~uat state thia proceae will not be opened u~) for ~ythlng ~lee and delineate why. He retorted, a. a remult, the Board will k 9rantin~ up front exemptions only for the~. three communities. He advised against ~kln9 an lnterprt tat ion on ]ugi~latlve Co~lssloner O~dnight indicated her support for Commissioner S~nders' pro~al. Co~isaloner Saundera clarified for the record his Justifications for a~ndln~ the ordinance exclusively for the~. three ar~d.; that areas where, if the zoning re-evaluation and/or the compatibility pro- ~ the intent Of the ~ard is tO pro--re growth In those areas where remtr~cting gr~*th will be detri~ntal to that overall community and September 25, 1990 to Collier County as a whole, Commissioner Hasse asked for clarification on the status of Carlton Butler, ~layor of [verglad~ City, ~tated [vergiades te not directly involved ~[~h the rezon}ng process because they have their ~ Comprehensive Plan. He said, ~o~ver, he supports the dents of these three areas ~cauae they are the backbone of his city. Ee re~rted the econo~/ or the entire area S~ d~p~nd~nt on the u~e~ discussion, He urged the ~ard to a~end the ordinance to allow these areas to r.aain a~ th,~y ar- presently ~tg ~1~11, to di~ct Staff to prate ~ ~t to the ~ ~lMtl~ ~di~e ~ti~ Pigtails, ~okolos~ee ~d Nr, Hall reqtiested th~ ~)ard Include In the amendment m~nt Ion Of the "Co~land area*, and not Cop~land exclusively. County Attorney Cu'/ler commented th,at Staff agrees on the general areas o~ Chokolo~kee and Plantation, but there ~y be discussion on ~t e~ld or should not b~ included In the Copeland area. Co~laelon~r S~und~r~ ~ugg~ted directing Staff to ~v~luat~ what Nr. Blanchard cossur~lcat~d, ~ · result of th~ proc~ ~htch will ~ undertaken ~lth thl~ exempt Ion, the Board may b,. concern*~d with VR zoning and the density all--ed. He advised that l~u~ ~tll be ~~nte. Co~lssloner Goodnight volunteered to organize a Citizens Advisory ~lttee from th~ Everglades area to discuss that Issue in order [o ~ve tn~t from th~ community a,s a ~hol~. 5h~ ~st~t~,l ~ts~ ~lll brlnU recom~tlons tros that Coulttee back to the Board. ~ere ~ln~ flo further business for the Good of the County, the ~ettng ~as adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: B:4b P.~. es 000,,-,,. 210 BOARD Or COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX O~W~CIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL l'hese mtnutee approved trff th~, Board on presented ~ or aa corrected ~ 000.;: 2~1 Pa~? 85