BCC Minutes 01/16/1990 R Naples, Florida, January 16, 1990
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zontng
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. In REOULAR SESSION In Building
"F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, wtth the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Max A. Hasae, Jr.
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe
Richard S. Shanahan
Burr L. Saundere
Anne Ooodntght
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkos~, Finance
Director; Maureen Kenyon and Ellis Hoffman, Deputy Clerics; Nell
Dorrtll, County Manager; Ron McLemore, Assistant County Manager; Ken
Cuyler, County Attorney; Leo 0cbs, Administrative Services
Administrator: Mike Arnold, Utilities Administrator; Kevtn O'Donnell,
Public Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation
Services Administrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services
Administrator; Dave Weeks, Planner; Sue Ftlson, Administrative
Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomllnson, Sherlffte Office.
O0001
Page 1,: '.
AND C~KIFT AOENDA - APPROVED #~TH ¢IlM~3ES
Commissioner Sh~ moved, seconded ~ Co~loolone~ ~lght,
c~rted ~lnously, that the A~nda ~d Consent A~n~
~r~ with the following ch~geo~
Item 9H5 re approval of bond underwriter and pro,act oche~le
for the South County Regional Collection System Attettlent
Bond loose - Added.
2. Item 9H6 re authority to make payment to L&rue P1L'inlng
Services - Added.
Item 12F re waiver of fees for Plantation Isles Community
Clean-up to be held January 20, 1990 - Added by Commissioner
Goodnlght.
Item 14D3 re authorization to solicit professional engineering
services for the design and construction of lob end opeF&tlone
facilities for the North County Regional Naatewetep T~lltllnt
Plant under a design/build contract - Added.
PItOCLAMATZON RKCOGNZZXNO JANUARY lB, 1990, AS BARREN COLLX~lq
SCHOOL FOO~BAL~ ~ZCOGNXTXON DAY - ADOPTE~
Upon reading of the procl~mation by Commissioner Volpe,
Commissioner maunders moved, seconded by Cotuleeloner VoZpe and
carried unanimously, that the proclamation recognizing
1990, 80 BLrron Collier High School Football Recogn~t~o~
&dopted.
Commissioner Hesse thanked the football team for the fine Job that
they have done and Indicated that It le m great pleasure to have ouch
on outstanding team and presented a plaque to Coach Manle¥.
Coach Henley thanked the t:ommlssion for their time end Indicated
that he ~s proud of the team.
Fr&nk McClintock of the Collier County School Board thanked tho
Board of County Commissioners for acknoMlsdglng tho
OOOU?
Page
Page
PROCLAI~T/O~ DESXGNATZRG 3ARUARY 21 - 2T, lgg0 A~ KIWAWIB MEEK
~C~/ZING K~ZS CLUBS OF GOLDEN ~TK. N~LES ON ~ ~. ~
~R~SZD~, N~LES ~ST, NAPLES. ~ ~CO Z5~ - ~~
Commission%er Ha,se read and presented tho proclemltAon to MF. Bob
C~l~looner Sanders mo~d, 8econded ~ Co~loel~eF Vo~ ~d
c~rl~ ~luouoly, that the proclmtlon desolating =~ ~1 -
~7, lOgO ao K~w~o Week reco~lzlng Klw~o Clubs of aolden Oa~e.
Xap/eo on the Gulf, Naples Norths/de, Naples Eaat, Xapleo, ~d~co
Isled ~ adopted.
H~, Blocke~ accepted tbs p~oc~amatlon ~nd Indicated that the
Kl~e:~ls C~ub ~111 continue to ~ork fo~ the community,
Lt. Gove~no~ Hike Hiller spoke on behalf of the ~em~ln~ng K1w~nl~
C]ubs, thanking t~e Board of County Commls~lone~ fo~ the proc1~-
riga.
00011
Page
Januery I~, :ggo
Xt~ ~B1
Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily Net,~ on
December 19, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed With
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-89-12,
flied by Kris Dane of Coamt~l Enotn~ering Consultants, Inc., repre-
senting Astron Development o~ Naples, Inc., requesting a rezone from
"E" to "PUD" for a commercial development to be kno~ &e Aatron
for property bordered to the north by Pine Ridge Road, to the &&et
Oaks Boulevard, to the south by lOth Street S.W., and to the w~mt
l-?5 Canal/I-TS0 cons/sting of 7.6± acres In Section 17, Township 49
South, Range 26 East, In Collier County, Florida,
Planner Weeks stated that this is a request for a rezone to a
mer¢tal PUD for 7.6 acres located at the southeast corner of 1-75 and
Pine Ridge Road. He stated that this pro~ect constitutes the
southeast quadrant of the activity center at that location. Re &tared
that across Pine Ridge Road to the north is the Vineyards PUD, to the
east across Oaks Blvd. also known aa Naps Way and to the south across
lOth Avenue S.W. are properties zoned Estates. He indicated to the
west across 1-75 Is the Suther]and PUD. He noted tha~ In reviewing
th~s request for consistency w]th the Growth Management Plan, t~
~ssues arose; the first Is the consistency of the criteria fo~
rexonlng and the second issue pertains to compatibility with the
single-family homes. He Indicated that Staff had some concern with
the market demand and servlc~ area analysis for the proceed project,
noting that after reviewing the Information provided by the petitioner
a~ well as review of the commercial land u~e and market study thtt
done tn 1987 by P/ant&c, Staff has determined that the
that la prov/ded Is not adequate and doem not ~ustlfy the need
tl~e for the proposed uses at thle specific ~ctlvlty c~at*~
with the possible exception of office uses. Ho stated thmt tho /oct-
000 ! R
~anuary 1~o ~0
tion of the property is suitable for & non-residential developlent of
some type, adding that the majority of the uses will be to serve the
traveling public; fast-food restaurants, full service restaurant.
Iotel, convenience store, sad gas pumps/automobile service station
type uses. He Indicated that the sits is spproprlete for these uses.
He reported that Pine Ridge Road Is one of the five laJor roads that
leads from the Estates area Into the urban area and will have a
substantial amount of traffic from the Estates area traveling by thAI
site. He stated that 1-75 Is projected to be completed An Broward and
Collier Counties In the early 1990's which will mean more traffic tra-
veling by this site on 1-75. He stated that with regards to col-
patlbtllty, Staff had concerns and recommendations have been lade for
Increased development standards with greater setbackl away
Estates area, greater buffering requirements, and buffering &rot~ld the
Interim sewage treatment plant to make It more visually appalling. He
Indicated that Staff's recommendation, based upon the developlent
standards and the buffering requirements as well aa the consideration
of the location, Is that this project be found to be consistent with
the Growth Nanagement Plan. He noted that there were a few changes
lade to the Agreement Sheet at the CCPC hearing on Decelber 21, 1989,
but none were substantial. He Indicated that some of the changes w~re
to delete Items 13 and 16, noting that the Petitioner proposed the
standard language listing specifically the uses that would be per-
litted on the various tracts and then the language that states col-
parable and compatible uses a~ determined by the Zoning Director or
Planning Services Manager would be allowed. He Indicated that 8tiff
recoauaended that this be deleted as their concern was that other
~ould be Included that would not be con~lstent with thai type of deve-
lopment. He noted that there ~as a change to Item 15 on the Agreement
Sheet with regards to th~ se, tback requirements to make tt morl
stringent and Item 27 ~aa changed to clarify ho~ the denllty for
hotel would be calculated. He no,ed that there Is ~n Issue of
lln~age regarding9 the utllitiem and connection of water
00019
Pa~e 8
J·nuar7 lS~ lggo
noting that the County water service Is not currently available and
that this project would have to be connected to the Vineyards project
in order to receive County water at this time, He Indic·ted thlt
after discussing this matter, Project Rsvie~ Services hal no objection
to the language as being proposed by the Petitioner becau·e the
Vineyards will be coming in for s request to del~y the Nape Blvd.
construction and at that time, Staff proposes to add a stipulation
that requires the Vineyards to build the water line In advance of
total construction if It la needed by someone else. He stated th&t
even If the Vineyards is not ready to construct Nspa Nay, ·nd
development Is ready and proposes to tie Into that water service, then
the Vlney&rds would have to construct the water line. He reported
that the Petitioner presented some Information at the CCPC hearing
that was agreed upon between the Petitioner and the Vineyards
requesting some changes to the PUD document that were as stringent or
Rote stringent recommendations pertaining to buffering, eetb&cka,
architectural theme, and sign·ge theme than what was proposed by
Staff. He Indicated that the CCPC made a recoRmend·tlon of 5/0 to
deny the project, noting that there was concern because of the
slay of the uses and the Impact that there would be In the surrounding
neighborhood. He Indicated that these concerns were voiced by the
residents In the area. He noted that Staff has received · total
letters objecting to this project. He Indicated that this activity
center has s total of 170 acres, noting that the 1-75 activity cen-
ters are different than other activity centers In the County as they
ars site specific. [[~ indicated that instead of being 1/2 all·
~luars, the 1-75 &ctlvlty centers have vary specific bound·riss. Ne
stated that approximately 81 acres of the 170 acres la zoned couuer-
cl·l, adding that the uses ars to serve the traveling public. He
noted that the previous comprehensive plan llmlfed cowlerctal develop-
Rent close to 1-75 to uses that serve the traveling public. He at&ted
that the current Growth Management Plan provides for the whole array
of commercial development to be allowed subject to the rezoning pro-
000 0
3anuar¥
cass and the factors listed in the Growth H&nagement Plan. Ha
reported that one petition with 20 signatures was received opposing
this petition, He indicated that 8 letters that ~era receAved
that if the Commission does approve this prelect, It ie being recom-
mended that Naps Way be closed, which would alleviate traffic from
entering the residential area. He concluded by stating that the
recommendation from Staff is for approval subject to stipulations and
the CCPC recommendation is for denial.
Xn answer to Commissioner Volpe, Planner #saks orated that the
position 8toff has taken 18 that other considerations lika the pro-
Ject'a specific location at th, interchange, the classification of Pine
Ridge Road and the volume of traffic that it carries and is expected
to carry in the future, outweighs the considerations that retail type
uses might be premature at this time.
Commissioner Ooodnight questioned the transportation piano for
Naps Way, to which Planner Weeks stated that there ia no longer a pro-
posal for Oaks Blvd. or Naps Way to continue further to the south,
adding that it will dead-end where it is. He noted that if the road
is closed off it will not effect any future plans, but it ~ould elimi-
nate the cut throuoh for t{m~ ~ners! public of the County am
the residents and it would also eliminate & second point of emergency
access.
Xn answer to Commissioner Shanahan0 Planner Weeks stated that even
with all the changes that have ~een made, they are not sufficient
enough to mitigate the concerns of the neighbors.
Hr. Dudley Ooodlette of Cummings and Lockwood, rep.resenting Aatron
Development of Naples, stated that this petition contemplates that the
?.6 acre parcel would be rezoned from Estates to PUD to be known as
Astron Plaza. He sta~ed that accordin9 to the Futura Land Uae Element
of the Growth Management Plan, the site ia located within one of the
three specifically defined interstate activity centers. He orated
that the water for the project will tie into the County water system
in accordance with the proposed PUD document. He noted that with
Page
3anuary 16, lggo
respect to sewer, an Interim on-site westewater tre&tsent plan &s has
been discussed Is proposed for Tract 3 until the County facilities are
available to the site. He Indicated that the Petitioner hal agreed to
the utility stipulations relating to on-site wastswater treataent and
the additional stipulations relating to the neighbors concerns. He
noted that the project will utilize on-site dry retention, adding that
the water management system will consist of valley gutters, catch
basin swales, and dry detention; off-site discharge will be to the
1-75 canal, He stated that the project was revisited by Nater
Management and was recommended for approval. Mr. Ooodlette indicated
that the project Is primarily upland and is dominated by elalh pine
and will preserve and enhance a 30 foot native species
buffer along the entire southern boundary of the property. He
cared that the Petitioner agreed to all stipulations and the
recommended approval of this petition; also, that they have agreed to
limit the use to drive-in banks, office, hotel/motel, convenience/food
sart, gasoline salem, full-service restaurant and feat-food
restaurant. He stated that the Petitioner has agreed to ainiatze the
concerns raised by the Vineyards and their concerns were resolved at
the CCPC seating. He noted that he was hopeful that all the
could be resolved to the satisfaction of the neighboring
but this has not been done completely. He Indicated that the
Petitioner has Increased the minimum lot size from 10,000 square feet
to 22,500 square feet, the minimum tract width has been lncrealed and
the side yard setbacks have been Increased. He noted that · 80 foot
building setback has been provided from the loth Avenue 8.#. right-of-
w&y~ an additional landscape buffer ia being provided around the
interim wastewater treatment plant~ covenants and deeds of
tlons are being emtablished to ensure that the project il · unified
architsctur&l theme; site access Is being limited to one loc&tion on
Nape Blvd.; height is being limited to 30' on Tracts 1 and ~ and
on Tracts 2, 3, and 4; and convenience stores, gasoline s&lae, and
fast-food restaurants are being restricted to Tr&cts l, ~, and
000 ',
January l~. lggo
order to resolve some of the neighbors concerns. He stated that all
of these concessions have been made after meeting with the neigh{more,
and as a result of additional meetings with the neighbors, the
Petitioner la willing to Install a chain link fence 8' high aJong lOth
Ave. $.M. with appropriate hedging along the exterio? of tho fence{
contribute up to $5,000 to assist in the closing of Olmke Blvd.{ and
agree to construct the entrance of the project in such a manner al to
discourage the entry of traffic coming from loth Ave. S.M. to the pro-
Ject and to discourage the exit of traffic from the project onto 10th
Ave. S.~. lie stated that they are willing to stipulate to these addi-
tional conditions in the PUD document, He noted that the Futura L~nd
Use Element of the Growth Management Plan states that activity centers
ars intended to be mixed usu in character and the actual mix of the
various land uses, commercial, residential, and institutional shall be
determined during the rezone process based on considerations of
number of factors. H~ reported that the P~tttioner ia not requesting
a mixed use; simply the interstate commercial because this le what the
Petitioner ~eels is suitable for this development. He indicated
the Future Lane Use Element also states that the standard for inten-
sity of uses within each activity is that the full array of commercial
.uses may be allowed, but it is preferred that all new commercial
zoning within an activity center shall be in the form of & PUl) which
is what the Petitioner is proposing. He noted that there are four
separate owners to this property that have agreed to allow the
Petitioner to assemble their parcels in such a way ae to submit the
PUD proposal. He stated that they have not been able to resolve all
the concerns of the neighbors, but they have certainly tried.
stated that this is a rezone only to the PUD master plan, noting that
any further action{ la subJffct to subdivision m&ater plan and site
development plan approval. He concluded by stating thmt he it
requesting that this parcel be rezoned in order to be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Ooodnight questioned if the 30 root landec&~
Utlvely.
uss Is not In this activity center, noting that he feels that this
~ould be a good location for a bank, or a day care center.
Hr. Ooodlette stated that If this parcel was larger, · mixed uae
say be a better use, but with only 6.? acres, a commercial uae to
serve the ~nterstate traveling public Ia more appropriate,
The following people spoke against this petition because of noS·e,
traffic, safety of children, trash, potential leakage of gas tanks,
devaluation of property, odor, Increased crime, lncompatlbtlSty with
residential uses, and the II, tensity of use for the property~
Shat! Barnett, 6230 IOth Ave. S.N., (Pictures presented to as·rd)
Steve Nallace, 6210 loth Ave.
James Blake, 2064 Plneland Street, (Pictures presented to Board)
Kelth Honk, 6010 10th Ave.
Hope Brac~, 5911 loth Ave. S.W. (Letter read by Ns. Breck fro·
Cindy Qrant opposing project)
George ~eller, representing Collier County Civic Federation
Hr. Ooodlette stated that the concerns of what will actually be
constructed on the property Is subject to further review and ·
division master plan approval as we~ ab a site developnent pl~
approval. He stated that ~hat he lo presenting thSo date ~ only
conceptual master plan for zoning pur~oes only and the f~vo tractt
that are now shown could be presented as one tract in tho final eta-
geo. He lndtcated that with raj·fda to traffic, tho Petitioner
wt~lng to close off ~apa Bl"d. at 10th Avenue S.M. and he hag agreed
to pay a portion. He Indicated that the Petitioner to conceded
the safety of the children and the Intrusion of traffic l~to tho real-
.eh trySng to do this. He noted that activity centare are
to prevent strip coaaerclal and this ~ designed to acceded·ts the
traveling public. He noted that Staff has race,ended approval
this project and he 18 requesting that the BCC do the labs and
thio petition.
000 4
Page
~anuary 18, 1990
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Ooodlstte stated that the
hotel la conceptual and subject to a site development plan approv&l,
but they are contemplating a 2 story, lO0 unit motel.
Co-missioner Volpe ~oved, seconded by Comiseloner Ik~tntght
c~rl~ ~laouely, that the public hearing ~
Commissioner Saundera ~estloned if there should be m concern
a~ut the gas tanks and a potential for pollution of the water In the
ares, to which Utilities Administrator Arnold stated that there are
lot of safe.erda, noting that the more stringent retirements almost
eliminates the possibility.
Planner Weeks stated that DER has a requirement that there
500 foot separation from a water well to the absorption bede at the
treatment plant site and with regards to the gasoline station, DER ham
the retirement of having a double tank or having a monitoring system.
In answer to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Goodlette stated that they
are not asking for any site specific use, noting that a hotel la ~-
mitred on all tracts except a3.
Co~lsslongr Shanahan stated that he feels that ~ brick wall
originally asked for by the neighbors would be much nicer than m chain
link fence with buffering. He stated that he feels that this Issue
should be revisited.
Co~lssloner Saunders stated that this petition 1~ a rezone
there Is also a conceptual site development plan attached
the list of uses that would be potential uses for the five tracts
~esttoned if the Petitioner co~em back with a site development plan
that shows all the uses with adequate parking, setbacks, and o~
· pmce pursuant to the existing ordinances, ~uld the BCC have any
discretion In Indicating that all facilities could not be built
~cmuse It Is felt that there la too ~uch usage for that
C~dnty Attorney Cuyler replied negatively, adding that once the
mitred uses are established, It is simply a matter of adhering to the
radiations.
000 5
property, then the BeC would have to do so at this ties.
that he has concern ~$th regards to the Intensity of this property.
He stated that he does not have a problem with designating this pro-
party as a PUD, but he feels that there needs to be IOml work dons on
the site development plan. Re Indic&ted that this petition lay h&v~
to be continued In order to resolve the problems.
Hr. Goodlette stated that the Petitioner has Increased
size R-l/4 times ~hat the code requires. He stated that hs thought
concerns had been resolved ~lth regards to lot size.
Commissioner Saundere stated that he ls Itot sure that dealing with
lot size is mtlch of a ~onc~nsto[~ I)~cause a beak would not fit on
10,000 square foot lot due Lo parking and setbacks. He indicated that
his concern Is the intensity of the development that wi~] bi p~acsd on
this ?.6 acres, but he does not have any factual basis to support this
feellngo He stated that the BCC has flexibility in this I~ttl~ It thl
present time, but once this rezoning Is approved, the flexibility of
the BCC evaporates.
Commissioner Volpe stated that with regard to the lntenllty of
u~ he ~o ha~ ~o~e conce~.
Co~ssloner Saunders questloned if It ~uld be appropriate
mend this petition back to the CCPC to conslde~ the -odlftcltlonl that
have been made and to ~e-evaluate the Intensity of the tme
property? He Indicated that this petition does not need to go ~ck
through the entire p~oceaa, l.ut he ~ould like to have till CCP~
It ~g~ln In otde~ to alleviate some of hl~ concerns.
Sanders. noting that If they were to build only a full
reet~urant and =otel, she feels that th~ ~uld be ~uffic~ent
restaurant could be deleted and ~ filling station and
restaurant could be built. She indicated that there l~ too ~ch that
0001 6
could be placed on the five tracts,
¢onlssloner Saundera stated that he does not feel that a motel
could be unacceptable, he Is simply saying that with the other
around the motel, it ~pp~ars that there are too many ue~e for the
tracts.
Nr. Ooodlette stated that there should be a vehicle available to
have a conceptual PUD m~ster plan without the tract, la~d out, with
the zontn0 approved, and then the Petitioner could come b~ck #lth one
plan for tho development for the entire ?.6 acres. He ntated that he
is not sure if he agrees or disagrees with County Attorney
noting that If the 7.6 acres la rszonsd to a PUD commercl&l, the
Petitioner will have to come back and go through the Sul~lvle~on
Master Plan process and if t~e BCC ia not happy with th~
the use off the plan, then it can be denied.
Coniasloner Goodnlght stated that If the Board lo looking at 8
elto development plan and the Petitioner has been told ~hat they can
have on the property with regards to the rezoning, but the Board then
feels that tt is too much on the property, the site development plan
can be denied.
County Attorney Cu¥1er stated that If there lo a master plan that
la attached to the PUD which is in accordance with all regulatlonm and
If the Board decided that the plan was too intense, It could not be
denied If the Petitioner had met all the criteria. He Indicated that
Mr. Goodlette ts indicating that the plan could be changed. He noted
that when the Staff reviews these site development plan~,
~arlly look at the Petitioner's adherence to development
Hr. Ooodlette referred to Page 48 of the PUD document, Paragraph
~.a.a ~hlch states: "This project la recommended for appr~al for
rezoning purposes only. The Subdivision Haeter Plan or a
~velopaent Plan shall be submitted and approved at a late~ date,
re. ired.' He stated tha~ has Intention of this petition A~ for
rezonAng purposes only.
Co~lssAoner Saunders stated that he feels that to an extent
Pa,l~ 14
000 >
3anuary 18, 1990
Goodlette Is right, but once the property 11 rezoned It le /llited to
the codes that are In place and the Board cannot determine at that
time that they do not like the plan because they feel that there
too much Intensity of use, He noted that they can only look at the
technical codes and If all those standards are met. it ham to be
approved, He Indicated that this ia the time that the Board has
discretion,
eee.~ Recess: 11:00 &.~, - Raconvenedz 11~10 A.N. at ad, ich
time [keputy Clerk Hoff~n replaced l~mt~Clerk
carnl of ~he Commission can be accommodated, and adv~led
r~ues~ng a continuance to take this petition back to the CoOl,er
County Pla~lng Commission (CCPC} for further revA~ of the
~aster P]an, and come back to the Board at an early date.
~d c~t~ ~l~uely, that PetltAon R-89-12 ~ re~rtl~ to
~d ~to~ the CC~ ~d the ~ard of C~W Co~taelone~
e~ll~t ~lble date.
It~ ~Cl
~~TZON ~ ~C~GE Or PROP~ ~SU~ TO STA~ ~A~
125.37 ~ ~~ MIDDLE ~CH~ - CO~I~D ~R O~
Legal notlc~ hflvlnu t)e~ pt~bll~h~d In the Naple~ D~IIy Hewl on
January 5, and 11, 1990, aa evidenced by Affidavit of
flied wtth the Clerk, public hearing was opened to conllde~
agreement for the exchange of re.~l property between Collier Co~ty
the School Board of Col]tar Cuunty.
~bllc Services Administrator O'~anell stated that
housekeeping 1tam ~n conjunction ~th the lmmokllee N~ddle 8ch~l
Heath property exchange between Collier County and the
District. ~e reported that pursuant to previous Board
St~ff has continued to prepare the appropriate docuslntltlon ~rlu~t
to State Statute. He indicated that the County Attorneytl office
prepared the appropriate re~olutlon, authorizing the exchange of the
properties.
Page 18
1990
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. O~Donnell advised that the
essential terms and conditions of the agreement spell oat how
the 14 acres of the Heath property, which the County currently owns,
will be exchanged for the 14 acres of the Immokalem Nlddle School pro-
perty.
Commissioner Volpe noted that subsequent to the execution of
agreement, both parties shall enter into an agreement whereupon the
School Board shall have the right to use the gymnasium and certain
other facilities located on said School property, and questioned how
the requested agreement can be approved, without having received the
agreement regarding the gymnasium?
Mr. O'Oonnell replied that the School Olatrlct had expressed
desire to use those facilities during the time that tho new lmmokelae
Hlddle School was under construction. He noted that a~nce there
be a three yea~ phase-la for the rehabilitation of the lmumok&~me
Middle School for the County's Ilea am a recreations! facility, Staff
did not see a conflict with being able to do that.
Assistant County Attorney Wetgel stated that on Aprl~ lB, 1989,
the Commission approved the agreement which is provided in todayee
backup. He noted that the agreement contained conditions to comply
with Section 125.37 of F.S. concerning the exchange of property that
As o~rned by the County. With regard to the uae element am questioned
by Commissioner Volpe, he advised that the agreement has not been
signed off or transmAtted to the School Board attorney since · revl~
of the title of the County-owned property reflected a defect appearing
in the record. He stated that the School Board has indicated that
they have no present use of the element that Commiemion®r Volp~ Il
questioning, and therefore, the Co~nty will move forward with the con-
vayance within 30 days of the resolution which will be adopted today.
Be advised that the title defect has been cured.
Commissioner Volpe stated that he has reservations regmrdtng the
approval of this item. since It Is unclear aa to what the Commission
la being asked to do.
000 9
January 16, 1990
County Attorney Cuyler advised that there ia an existing contract
which was signed in April that requires the conveyance of the pro-
pertlea.
Commissioner Volpe stated that there appears to be loose ends that
nasd to b~ tied down. He noted that if there is an agreement, he
w~uld like to see it.
Coamlssioner Hesse concurred with Commissioner Volpo.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that there may be something
in the description of what is taking place, and suggested that this
item be continued for one week, to better provide the Comalealon
&ny missing links.
ComLt~oloner Saundars moved, seconded ~Co~ee~e~ Vol~
~l~ ~l~ly, to continue this %tam fo~ one ~k.
l~
Utilities Administrator Arnold explained that thi~ {te~ {~
review and discuss the proposed financing arrangements and the award
of con~racts, etc. for the "East and South Naples 8~n{~ary
System Project". He recalled public hearings which ~re concluded
Septem~r, 1988, and noted that the resolutton~ which ~re com~{on~
to that action included orderi~g the construction, and complet{o~ of
the desl~ for the project.
H~. Arnold advised that on January 2, 1990, tentative awards
~de for 4 of the 5 construction contracts for the proJectm,
indicated that the tentative awards were a mechanism to convey the
construction documents to the the State and EPA for their revl~
since there are grants ~nd loan funding ~nvolved {n the project.
· tated aha2 final award of those contracts need to be made no
than February 27, 1990.
Mr. Arnold explained that since the public hearing~, the
de~l~ ha~ been concluded, the necessary e~ement~ h~ ~l~
· grant for ~5 million has been f~n~lized, and receipt of the
P&ge 17
00080
Jsnuar7 18, lggo
loan agreement in the amount of $10.? allllon from the St&ts is anti-
clpated any day. He noted that there le one remaining construction
contract, for which bids will be received In February, elth the award
of the tentative bid shortly thereafter.
Mr. Arnold reported that the total cost of the project to b~
funded Is approximately $36 million: 75~ for construction, and 25~
for engineering, sits acquisition, financing and legal costs, etc. He
indicated that certain cost reduction mechanisms are proposed today
for the Coeuaisslon's consideration, and noted that these should lo~r
the total cost to be borne by the local government. He stated that
after subtracting the grant and the loan, it 18 anticipated that
$13-14 million will need to be financed on the local baals.
Mr. Arnold Informed that at the conclusion of the public hearings,
the assessments to th, property owners ~ere approxlmatml¥ $48-$62 pot
front foot across the five assessment Districts. He explained that
anticipated grants and loan funding wes also discussed at that ties,
and noted that those adjustments have the potential to hold the
assessments at $39-$44 per front foot, as compared to the previous
assessments amounts. He Indicated that the assessments tn District 5
are slightly higher, and he will discuss these later In the presen-
tation.
Mr. Arnold stated that as part of the backup, he has Included a
nap sho~lng the assessment districts, boundaries, and the overall
outline of the project. He Informed that he has ~lso Included ~ sue-
presented to the Commission in September, 1988, and i su~ o~ the
~lslblt adjustments to be considered today.
Mr. Arnold called attention tn the summary o~ ~sslbll IdJultllnts
to reduce assessment rates, as presented at the Septem~r 27, 1988
public hearing. He noted that there were adjustments rela~lng ~o the
gr~t. a~lnlstratlve coots. Beyshore Drive laproveaento, and ~
adjustment r~r the 03.00 surcharge.
Mr. Arnold advised that there wan considerable die,melon relating
Ps~e 18
00031
'%)
January la, 1900
to the $1.00 surcharge, and the basis of this was that $1.00 l~r ~onth
would be added to every sewer customer's bill In the County aa · sub-
sidy for the East and South Naples Project. Ns Indicated that the
project Is lntendnd to remov~ septic tanks, and packsge plante which
propose ~otentl&l ground water pollution, health hazards, etc., and
therefore, would benefit the entire County. fie stated that Staff felt
that this surcharge may cause problems, in that, other people ara
still paying their own sewer assessments for their area and they ara
the County's sewer customers, and they ars being asked to pay $1.00
per month to subsidize another assessment district,
He reported that a $I0 million grant was received for the
Sewer Plant and this was bas'ed on the flow that comes from the plant,
one year after the completion of construction. He advised that If the
County should lose part of that grant by not building the fast and
South Naples Project, and by not having It flow Into the sewer plant,
the loss of the grant would have to picked up by all the cuetoaare of
the County ~ater/Sewer District. He indicated that the range of
assessments after the adjustments were $39-$48 st that time.
Mr. Arnold referred to the January, 1990 summary of possible
adjustments to assessments as It relates to today. He Indicated that
this table reflects new costs, which are higher due to higher bide,
and the unadjusted front foot rates, ranging from 063-080 In four of
the districts, and $100+ for District 5.
Nlth regard to the present adjustments, Mr. Arnold informed that
Adjustment 1 relates to a grant In the amount or 05 million which has
been received and will be applied across the 5 assessment districts,
Ns noted that during the public hearings in 1988, the grant was only
applied to three of the five districts since the easements ~re not in
hand for t~o of the districts. Ns Indicated that Staff believes that
all the people within the 5 districts will benefit from the grant, and
It should be spread over all 5 Districts, which will result in
reduction.
Mr. Arnold stated that Adjustment 2 ia the administrative coats
Page
0003
~anuar~ 16. lggo
which the County bears to administer an assessment project, and
la a possible 5X reduction In the assessments.
Hr. Arnold called attention to Adjustment 30 relating to the
Bayshore Drive Improvements In the amount of ~524,258. Ne Indic&ted
that consideration may want to be given to taking these coats o~t of
District 1, and having the Water/Sewer District absorb the costa of
the earlier lsprovements.
Hr. Arnold explained that Adjustment 4 relates to a previous pro-
Ject which was contemplated to provide sewer service In East Naples
(Old South 1/2 of Sewer Area "B"). He advised that an ad valo~el
referendum was passed, and s c~rtaln millage was set aside to
that project. H~ noted that a certain amount of those funds
expended, and a certain asount still reealns. ~e Indicated that
legal hurdles can be resolved. Staff Is recommending that the
remaining money be applied to Assessment District #1 which coin. ides
with the Old South 1/2 of Area 'B'. He advised that there ars con-
cerns as to whether those monies should be directed back to the people
who originally paid that amount. He stated that the Oount¥ Attorney's
office Is recommending the pursuit of a declaratory Judgement to
determine how the monies will be disbursed.
Nr. Arnold reported that Adjustment 5 relates to plan and specifi-
cation changes which are tNe various cost reductions aa a result of
negotiations with the contractors, and totals approximately
million.
Hr. Arnold stated that A~Justsent 6 contatns Items that the
Co--lesion say wish to consider. Ne noted that there is a Nester
8ration within the gast and South Naple~ Project which ia the same aa
those that are being constructed as part of the Regional 8¥atel,
indicated that this is a regional coeponent0 and not a collection
system cosponent, and therefore, should be borne by the
District, as opposed to the Assessment District. Re advised that
there is also the opportunity to recoup the coats o~ pavement
that are being done in this area. He reported that he believes that
Page ~0
00003
~anuary %6, %990
':'there Is the potential for long-term repayment back to the Istessment
district In the amount of Sa00,O00.
Mr. Arnold mtated that Adjustment ? relates to excess
and noted that the engineers have tried to fine tune those a~ounts,
and it le anticipated that they can be reduced from 2~ - 4~ In reduc-
tions shown for the assessment district.
Mr. Arnold indicated that Adjustment 8 reflects grant %ncreasee.
He noted that there were higher costa and higher bids on the
and there is now the opportunity for additional grant funds.
stated that Orant Xncrease Request I1 in the amount of 01,673,4~8 hal
already been submitted. He reported that these funds ere contingent
upon federal funding and federal appropriations, but noted that he
confident that these funds wall come through . He explained that
]ncrease #2 in the amount of $200°000 Is questionable, since this
depends on whether or not the funds are still
With regard to Adjustment 9, relating to the $~.00 surcharge, Nr.
Arnold informed that ~he percentage reduction available Is ?~.
noted that Staff is not real supportive of this adjustment.
Mr. Arnold advised that the bottom line indicates that
assessments, with all adjustments accepted, range from $39-$44,
the exception of District 5.
Mr. Arnold explained ~hat the unadJueted Asmeeement ~ate
District 5 As $109. He noted that this District encompasses that area
on Radio Road, east of ~oxfJre, and is a concentration o~ mobile hose
p~rke. ~e advised that the only frontage ~h]ch la being asseaee~ for
those parka is the actual frontage on Radio Road. He stated that no
collection systems are bei~g ~nst&lled, but rather° pum~ stations to
replace the package p]ants. ~e ~ndicated that If the front ~ootagm
ra~e ~or this District Is lowered, the special aseeeement rate
have to be Increased, and the net result la that those people
at%ll be paying the same rate.
A discussion took place relating to the #lndstar pro~ect~ and I~-.
Arnold &eeured the Commission that Nindeter la indeed, lncluded~lthin
Page
00004
this project, and will be assessed.
3anuar~ 16. 1990
In answer to Commissioner Volpe. Mr. Arnold explained th&t svlry
property within the East and South Naples Project will pay t front
footage assessment, and noted that several of the properties which
alreed¥ developed and have package pleats will also pay · Iplol&l
assessment which Is associated with the costs for taking thole peckege
plants o~f line. He stated that the pump station costs will be
approximately $30,000 -
Commissioner launders questioned whether It ~ould m&ks eny sense
expensive? Hr. Arnold commented that this District could be teksn
out, but noted that another public hearing would be required, Re
advised that there are two parks In District 5 that DER II welting
the County to provide the means to get those package plants off line
due to serious problems: percolation ponds are not ~orklng, overflow,
and th~ plants are operating beyond their capacity.
Co~lssloner Volpe questioned whether there Is anothe~
district that surrounds District 57 Nr. Arnold replied tha~ there
no other sewer district which surrounds this District.
Hr. To~ Taylor, of Hole, Nontes · Associates, explained that the
front footage p~rtion of District 5 Is only the Radio Ro~d frontage.
and 1. approxtsately $25,000, plus an additional $75.000 for the ~p
station and the force ~aln to phase out the package plant. He
cated that the Utilities 91vlslon ~ould be sending an assess,eat bill
to the Hoseo~ers Association, or the o~er of the p~rk for $100,000
~d that ~ount ~ould be spread out to the lndlvldull ~lt
award of the construction contracts by the end of Febru&~, ~d ~
order to do so, legal funding sources suet be identified, He
cl~l ~dvlsors. He Indicated that the con.ansus of opiniou il t~t
· n ~ssessment b~cked bond issue, which will be · co~1~ to the
000 5
~anuary 16, 1990
to whether or not this can be accomplished by February, and thorn have
been discussions pertaining to bond anticipation financing, or If tho
the $20 million line of credit becomes available, this could b~ a
legal means for awarding the contracts,
Coulasioner Sounders questioned what type of closing costs will
be incurred if the line of credit ia utilized, and then a f~ ~ontha
later a bond issue ia used to pay off that line of credit? ltl'. arnold
advised that the balls from the contractors ~lll noes likely not ha~
to be paid out for 2-3 scathe after they beg~n ~rk, and noted that la
all probability, the lane of credit will not have to be used.
Hr. Dave Fischer, Financial Advisor of SunTrust 8ecur~tioo, l~O.,
explained that this will not be a normal bond anticipation note, ~t
it wall cone directly from the bank from the line of credit. ~e
orated that he does not know what the addAtAon~l costa wall be, if
any, after the initial coats for the line of credit itself.
Finance Director Yonkosky advised that the concept ~ to have the
Coanleelon co~lt to draw do~ on the lane of credit, but not ph~
elcally draw do~ on At, and there should not be an~ duplication of
closing coats.
Hr. Fischer stated that some documentation wall ~ re. ired indi-
cating that the $1,277,0oo will be segregated fron the $20 alllAon.
He noted that there nay be some legal coots Involved, and if eD, they
~uld ~ ainiaal.
Hr. Arnold revealed that there will bm & final public hearing, at
the conclusion of the project, to make any adjustments that the
Commission deems fit. Ha Indicated that the primary decision today,
is to receive the Board's approval to utilize the lln~ of credit as a
mechanism to show that funds are set aside to legally enter into
construction contracts.
In anMr to Commissioner Volpm, Mr. Arnold stated that fha
$8 million grant was awarded on September 30, 1988, and tho require-
manta are that thio money must be drawn upon with t~o years. He lndl-
0008
~anuar¥ 16, lggo
cared that grant requests should be submitted this au~er.
Hr, Arnold Informed that st the time of the public he&rlngo ~n
1988, discussions were held regarding m I0 year re~&y~ent perlod~ b~t
It has since been determined that a 20 year repayment period Aa ~re
desirable.
~i~ioner 8a~dera a~d. aecond~Co~ieei~e~ight
~ c~l~~i~oly, to a~ro~ the adJ~ta ~ i~t~
~ ~~, 1990 8~ O~ ~eolblo AdJuot~to To ~o~~.
000, ?
Pa~e 2¢
FZIIA]~IJLT. JI~Y~ISO~ AJ~D FZNA3C~ COI~IZTT~ TO ~~ ~t~ ~
Assistant to the County Han~ger Hctemore stated that thJm ~tem
a companion to the ~revloum Item. ~e called attention to the pro~ect
achedule for the South County Regional Collection $yatea
~nd l~eue ~hlch indicates the aanner In ~hlch the project
He noted that by approving the adjustments In the previous Item, the
budget has been established. He noted that the second obJectl~
relates to the appointment of the bond unde~rlterm.
Mr. McLemore advised that on February 6, lggO, the CoaaaleeAon wall
award a[Ine of credit to a vendor; February 20, 1990, la antlclpoted
for approval of the loan contract with the State of Florida Departaent
of Environmental Regulation; February 27, 1990, la scheduled for
approval of the final contract documental and the actual bond
will take place on Narch 15, 1990.
Mr. NcLe~ore stated that because there are so many organizatJon~
and authorities Involved In this very complex project, the assessment
bonds mrs more difficult than other types of bonds. Be explained that
the Flnanc~ Coaaittee felt that because $eith Barney was Involved with
Phase A of this project, It would be prudent that they remain In the
project, as the underwriter. Re indicated that the various feelings
of the Co~misstun relating to co-managers have been recognized,
stated that if co-managers are desired, this can be fulfilled, but
noted the size of the proJec.' does not demand this. He reported that
there have been concerns relating to the financial team, and noted
that If the Commission chooses to direct the team to address ItFPts fo~
ne~ under~rtters, financial advisors, attorneys, etc., this will b~
done.
Couissioner Saunders commented that he does not have a Qroblsm
with the addition of co-managers, but cited thst there ehoqlal~ h
hsJe for this, J,s, marketing cmpab$lity or failia~ity with thl
Jsct, Hs Indicated that he fe~ls that it ~uld be very ~t~hils to
OOO4!
January 16. logo
do RFPto for financial experts in the future to see what other oppor-
tunities are available in the marketplace. Re stated that there
no Indication of fees, of any kind.
Mr. McLemore stated that he believes that it wall be helpful to
acrs ahead with Sa/th Barney since they understand the project.
Co~uaissioner Shanahan advised that he ha8 no problem with the con-
tInuIty of Smith Barney. but noted that he does have & problem lance
thin was discussed at great lengths when the Marco Xeland bond
financing was discussed. He stated that he believes that co-lanier
managers should be considered for this project.
Coulssioner Saunders questioned the minimal amount of tame At
would take to receive responses to requests for propolall frei
underwriters? Hr. Fischer stated that an sd could be placed In the
Bond Buyers. so ~hat everyone had an opportunity to respond, or If
selective group Is desired, this could be accomplished An a hairier
Coulseloner Saundere indicated that If RFP's were to be lent to
l0 or 15 firms, they could be "fixed" out tomorrow. Mr. Fischer
replied th.~t if a broadcast system ia not used. responses could pro-
bably be received in 3 weeks.
Co~aluloner Saunders ~m~ed. seconded b~ Co~lsmicmer
c~--riedunanl~ou~ly, that the FAn,cAll A~oor ~d t~
~tt~ ~ d~t~ to pre,re ~eo for th~o project
~ fi~ In Collier Co~ty a~ ~ll as ~ ~Jor ~d
~l~ ~ ,~ ~ In ~ ~ka for the eelectlon o~
~~ltAng te~ ~'. to ~ pre~ for all fleeing t~ to
~te~ ~t i~ An the ~rketplace.
Coun~ A~orney Cuyler advised that the bond counae~ ~orka
nar$1y through his office. ~nd noted that he ha~ ~en ve~
Commls~lo~x' ~ .... :,.r'~ ~t.,t~d th~t h~ b~liev~a that th~
has the ability to look at bond counsel qualifications free other
liras An terns of fees and qualifications. He indicated that
00O42
Page
January 16, 1990
not to reflect that there has been any dlmeatAafact~on wAth Tol
~r. Yonkosk¥ suggested that the Commlealon conalder the fact that
the tine la clicking, and the total financing taan
"' Place before the conetrvctlon coatract la lat.
Iteu d~l
RKSOLUTXOXS 90-14, 90-15, AND 90-16 AMARDII~3 CKRTXFXC&TES OF
~X~I ~ ~CESSl~ TO ~GAU~ BUSSES, X~. D/B/A~X
~ooloner O~ght ~d, oeconded ~ CouSooloueP VoI~
c~l~~l~ly, ~ha~ the ~blXc hearing ~ oloo~,
~ c~l~ ~l~usly, that aeoolutlono 90-14,
~~ Cert~flcateo of ~bllc Con~nlence ~d ee~oolW to
M, Inc., D/B/A ~I Touro, See Braze T~I, Ina.,
~t ~rtatl~ Se~lceo, Inc. ~ adopt~,
Page ~7 ,~
January 18, lggo
· sees Recess: 12:50 P.M. - Reconvened: l:00 P,N. &t NhJch
tim Z)4imty Clerk Xenyon replaced ~W Clerk Hof~ eoooo
Commissioner ~asse lndice~ed ~ha~ o~ Thursday, Jenuiry ll, log0,
he received the ~inorlty r~port regarding th~ sal~s ta~ Issue and
Friday, January ll, 1990. a copy was presented to all the
Assistant County ~enege~ ~cLemore stated that the minority
h~s been Included In the official report of the Co~lttse tad will
· part of the public r~cord, (not received In Clerk to ~a~d
He stated that on September 26, 1989, the Board ~llld Resolution
89-276A creating the local option in[raotructuro olios t~ conlttee.
He stated that since that time. the committee hal been ~rklng ~
hard and has concluded their report. He Indicated that the
of the Committee, Dudley Goodlette, frill give an ovl~l~ of tho
re.rt.
Mr. ~dley Ooodlet~e presented the report to the Chalru~ of the
~erd (not received In Clerk to the Board office) and Ic~lodged tho
elected officials from the City of Naples and the City of ~trgladel
al ~11 as ac~owledglng and thanking the members of the Conlttee.
He stated that the Coulttee'8 first meeting Mas on October 26. 1989,
at Mhlch time there Mere 10 mem~rm~ five ~re ap~lnted ~ tho
t~ ~re appointed by the City of Naples. t~ ~re ap~inted ~ the
School Board; and one ~aa appointed bw the City of ~lrgladel.
noted that there was a ~ealth of knowledge and a broad section of
intellectual depth that was brought to the Coultteo. He noted this
nine meetings were held and ~enbero of the public attended.
re.fred that the Naples Civic Association, the Economic ~lop~ent
Council, and the Chamber of Conerce ~de presentations to tho
Conlttee. He indicated that shortly after the Coulttll
their deliberations and considerations, It Mai decided that
Page oS
000
~anuary 16~ lggo
u need to bring ad valorem property taxes under control ~nd the b~at
way ko do that would bo through the local option surtax, He ~oted
that there are limitations placed on the surtax which are limited to
playino catch-up. He indicated that by · vote of ? to { tho committee
recommends that this matter be submitted to a referendum in order for
the public to vote on this community issue, He referred to Page 9 of
the report, the recommendations of the Committee, noting thlt they
recommend that the one-cent local option lnframtructure aa]to taW be
placed on a referendum in the November general election. Ha stated
that they recommend that this one-cent be for 10 year· and if there a
the desire to renew it for a longer period of time, then the ll
through 15th years be subject to a referendum. He indicated that they
recommend that the use of the funds be restricted for four general
categories; Educational facilities, Transportation facilities,
Environmental and Natural Resource facilities, and Public Safety facl-
lie noted that the Committee recommend· that one-third of the one-
cent bo allocated to the Collier County Public Schools. He indicated
that Transportation facilities should Include state ~nd local roads
and bridges. Ne noted that the areas discussed under Enviroma~ntal
and Natural Resource facilities contemplate the expenditure of funds
to preserve, facilitate and enhance the quality of Collier County's
environment and natural resources, Including but not limited to, tho
beach, the pass, and water management Improvements for the censor-
varies of environmentally s~nsltlve lands and waterways. He stated
that · high priority of this funding should be guided toward the d~-
lopment of adequate sources of potable water. Ne reported that Publto
Safety facilities w~uld be for the Jail addition, th. Sheriff*a facl-
llty additions, as well as Emergency Medical Service· additions, Ha
stated that the distribution that lo being recommended ia that tho
County received a 53~ allocation{ the Collier County Public Schools
receive a 33~ allocation; the City of Naples receivm 13~ allooatio{~{
·nd the City of Everglades receive a 14 allocation. Re lndlcat~ that
000 1
~anuary 16, 1990
the sales tax going to a referendum vote Is only one recommendation of
seven recommendations In the report. He stated that the second recom-
mendation Is that the subject of a Tourist Development Tax b~ i;mt for
a referendum aa soon as possible and that the funds generated frei
that be~ tax should be allocated for the needs enumerated in the
Statute, one o~ which wotild he the maintenance of the natural relour-
ceo, He stated that the Committee also believes that to the
extent permitted by law, impact fees should be increased and the
School 8card should consider an Impact fee as an additions! revenue
source. He noted that development contributions ihould ells bo Bade
to supplement user fees and Impact fees to the extent that it il
deemed to be appropriate. He reported that smother element of the
recommendation speaks to the desire on the Committee'l part to
bringing ad valorem property taxes under control. Ne stated thlt the
Orowth Management Plans that have been adopted by local government
should be strictly enforced to ensure that the development codes and
3and development regulations are complied with. He lndicatmd that
another element of the report speaks to productivttye noting that
there wes m concern on the part of the members of the Committee, thlt
all elected bodies should take a leading role In ensuring thlt there
are economies of scale ~lthia their local governmental entity ~d thlt
some o~ratlng audit be considered as an option ~vallable to
elected officials Including the Constitutional Offic~r~ a~ wll tm the
$chool Board, the City of Napl,~s, and the County Manag~l office,
stated that tits last recommendation of the Committle rllltll to the
implementation which la what they will be doing n~xt, noting thlt hi
hopes th&t by February 15, lggo, an lnterloc~l ~gree~nt ~ill ~
effected that ~ould ~peak to the distribution of ~ny revenue ~ner~ted
from this source and that by March 15, 1990, that agreement ~ entered
into and submitted for a referendum.
Hr. George Keller, President of Collier County Civic
stated that the minority report was pre.anted to the ~0
I{~td by himself, Mr. Jim McOrath, and Egos HAll. He indlolt~ that
Page SO
limit es to how such impact fees can be charged, noting that the
amount of Impact fees necessary can be charged to finance capital
Infrastructure necessary to comply with growth end population. He
stated that another misconception Is that this males tax It going to
be paid largely by tourists, noting that he &eked for proJectionl of
melee tax for the past year which indicated that there Is not a big
Increase in males tax when tourist are here. He noted that the people
that will be paying the salem tax to Collier County ere the ones that
are already living in Collier County. He stated that If
that is on the wish list for the County le done, then more ~oney will
be needed, but If the wish list is cut do~n, there will not ~ I need
for additional taxes. He referred to various nu~r~ and
from the County budget ~hlch ~ere included In hie report, noting that
the greatest shortfall In roads Is for future growth ~hich eh~ld
taken care of by l~pact fees. He noted that ~o~t of the
In government buildings is for the next five ~ear~ ~hlch le future
growth. He stated that with regards to P~rks ~nd Recreational
tlem, It shows that existing deficiencies arm not much ~t thmrm Am m
bag defAclency for future growth.
reduced. He noted that the b~ue collar ~rker J. the one ~h~t purcha-
mae ~ore taxable Items for their needs and the~ are the o~e~ that are
going to pay for the w~mh ll.~t. He mtated that baaed on all the
fJ~ree tn the report, a salem tax lm not needed and ~t mhould not
~t on the referendum. He stated that he ham no object,on to ~tt~ng
this up for a referendum vote because he Jntend~ to clr~ o~ I
~J~ ~t~en now and November to educate the public regarding the
fl~reo arid why they should vote against the referendum.
ese ~W C~erk ~off~ replaced ~W Clerk ~ at this t~ ese
Nr. HcLe~ore reported that the Committee la reco~endAng
pro~rty t~ saving measures relating to the individual lalll t~.
O00, G
Page 31
,3anuary 1S. lggo
advised that they are asking that property tax Increases relating to
operating funds be limited to not more than growth plus ~nflstion. He
~ndlcated that the Committee Is recommending a 1.5 m~ll cap on the
School Board's Capital Improvement Fund, and noted that this cap
result in s .4 mill savings on an estimated $89 mlll~on savings over
the ten year period. He Indicated that the Committee lo recommending
that the County's Capital Improvement Fund continue to be kept mt l
mill during the period of the sales tax. He Informed that In
reviewing this, Staff believes that the County's Capital Improvement
Fund should be kept at a dollar amount rather than & I sill amount,
and advised that an opinion from bond counsel Is that this ca~ I~
accomplished to satisfy the Statutes.
Hr. HcLemore advised that If the 1 mill fund lo capped at
million which is the approximate amount that will be In placs st the
time of the November election, the millage rate will drop
rely .i mill per year, and by the end of the tenth year, the millage
rate for the 1 mill Capital Improvement Fund would be reduced to 4.241
mills or a savings of .5?59 mille which converts In dollarm ov~r the
ten years ~hat the males tax would be In place of approxlBately 071
million. He explained that this recommendation would b~ consistent
with the Committee's recommendation that growth related Infrastructure
projects not be financed by property maxem, but rather by lacrosses in
impact fees and other user fees. He orated that the only financing
that would be done from tho ~ mill fund If the Isles tax was approved,
would be the Non-CIE projects. He noted that this, In conJurtctlon
with the $89 million in savings from the schools, will result in
approximately $160 million over the tin y.ar period which will not
collected through property taxes.
Mr. McLemore stated that with regard to the bed tax
Staff believes that t~,ls Ss a 0ood co=~,romlse since it will provide
for the Initial $21 million in Improvements to be made to
and funded through sales tax and the monies from the bed
suffice as a trust fund to take care of repairs that wou~dbl ICht-
0oo ?
Pa~ 3~
duled for rehabilitation work and damage that ~ould o¢~r from
Relating to Impact fees. Mr, McLemore informed thst thtl ~ ·
very I~portant Issue to the Committee. He advised thtt Stiff ~1
asking for the Commission's direct]on In moving &held with RFP~I
an impact fee consultant to examine the County~ fee~,
Hr. McLemore stated that $t~ff does not agree with the
the Co~lttee, and the City of Naples In d~veloplng In
Agreement to ~mplement a more equitable d~mtributlon of the
Re noted that the Committee had discussed on many occlm~on,, the need
for an Interlocal Agreement with the Stmtm relmting to ~nlll t~t
t~nded from local sales taxes and $tmte Road proJectl.
Hr. HcLemore Informed that with regard to the Ll~e of pr~c-
JnpleBented to Involve the Constitutional Officers and all AgencLe~ to
beat accomplish this. He auggested the poaalbIlity of I blue ~tb~n
coulttee, ~nd the asslatance of ~n lndepmndent conmvlt~t to ~t
together m program that will allow all A~encles to hmvm g~te~ p~
Co~lmsloner S~unders stated that for the p~mt t~ ~m~s he hms
~ggested the development of a cost reduction progrmm to sn~e that
the Cowry Is operating as efficiently as possible, ~nd to let the
public ~ow that Collier County ts spending dollars efficiently.
Indicated that he Is requeatlng authortzetlon from the Coatmllon to
~t together e productivity proqra~ and present sane to the ~rd
Co~leeloner Volpe Indicated thet there h~ve been
that he ~uld like to see the lnte~loc~l Agreements In pllcl.
noted that he Is ~ot c.rt~ln about the special leglllltlon ~hich
recently requested to ~11o~ the schools to ~rtlcl~te, Re
that he elso has reservations pertaining to a 10 option Is o~td to
i 1/lO option.
Page 33
Conn/aa/oner Volpe questioned whether the report &nttclpetll that
there may be another Special Session of the Loglallturt In MIrch whirl
there u~uy be an additional lncreas® ~n gasoline taxes? Hi further
questioned ~f the report factors in the revenues to be genarlted from
should lapses impact fees. and there should also bi & Sail Imp&ct
es that growth la paying for growth.
County Attorney Cuyler advised that there 18 currently & chllllng~
to the County collection of schcol Impact fees.
Nr. Frank McCllntock, Collier County School Board Chalr~en, lasted
that the School Board has received many requests from members of the
public to address the impact fee issue, which has been done wlthl~
peet year. He Indicated that by law, the School Board amy not
an impact fee in and of Itself, but they may propose an Impact fee
ordinance and submit It to the Board of County Commissioners for adop-
tion. Be informed that at the last School Board meeting, & nand&tor~
land dedication was proposed, and It will be presented to thl Baird of
County Commissioners very shortly. He explained that tho proposed
ordinance la different from an Impact fei, In that, mt thl tIRO of
approval of a PUD or a larger project, the mandatory land dedlclt~on
la an exaction to the developer. He noted that the Board of
Commissioners will act upon that In the School Board's behalf,
Comalaaloner Shanahan stated that he la not satisfied with I con-
sultana determining whether 25~, 30~ or 50~ will be derived from tho
tourists.
County Attorney Cuylar stated the Sales Tax Committee liked hll If
there was & statutory cap relating to Impact flee. HI advised th&t
there la not a statutory cap, but rather a case law cap which Il
function of the Level of Service that 1o to be achieved,
coats, or capital acquisition costa. He stated that & member of
counties have ~mp&ct fees that Collier County demo not h&vl, and thl~,
ara generally the lower ticket Items. Ha Indicated that the
00050
not be dmed for deficiencies. With regard to the question to
Increasing impact fees. he explained that the parka and rtcreatlon and
librat'y impact fees are probably near the top of where thoel fill
should be. He indicated that increases in road Impact fees will be
presented to the Commission within the next 45 days.
Mr. McLemore mentioned that the major question that slide
addressed in an evaluation of impact fees, Aa where the l~nl £&~I
within deficiencies and the Commission.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald st&ted that
assuming that the Increase in road impact fill go Jato effect, and the
growth ]eve] remains as it ts today. Collier County will becoa~
cated that the~e are expensive road tmprovementl that wII~ ~
within the 5-~0 yea~ time f~ame, and that ]l where the def~c~ln~
Co~laalone~ Yelps questioned where the ~95 mtIlton fibre fo~
8tats Roads come f~om? M~. McLemo~e advised that thJl la the I0
rtb~n co. Jttee ~as estabJJshed to study the Issue of whether there
should ~ a sales tax, and If el, the form tt ohould take.
Informed that the committee has co.plated their report, and they are
reco~endlng that this i~sue be placed on the bal~ot, but alee
a~nate $100 million ~n proJectm than what ~aa originally pro.aid
Am needed from the local option aslel tax. and luggmmted that m
~rkmhop be held with st~f gotr~g throtl~h ~v~ry line $tel la
report and mdvAaAng ~hat la included An theme num~rm. He
it te placed on the bal~ot: show the public that the Co~ty Jo
reducing ~te costs, wherever poae/ble~ obtain a draft Of the
Page 38
~anuar~ 16, :ggo
T Xnterlocal Agreement, with the City o! Naplea, the CAW
and the School Board to guide the Commission in their dllcvllionl of
whether to place this Issue on the ballot,
Commissioner Volpe stated that he has the lama qu~mtAonl today,
that he had when this process began.
Mr. Ed Oaten, Executive Vice President, Naples Ar,a Chamber of
Commerce. stated that the Chamber supports a local govermaent
infrastructure surtax, commonly called a local option sales tax.
indicated that although there are a variety of related
lnc~uding but not limited to the length of time that a eur'ta~ should
allocation to other governmental agencies, ~t la the strong opAnAo~
the Chaser tba~ ~he voting public should be given th. op~rtumAty
decide ~he~her or not am Infrastructure aurtm~ should ~ l~i~ A~
CollAer County,
Nr. Oatea .~ated tha~ a local op~Aon ea~ea t~ Aa a v~ab2e ~d
preferable a~ternatAve to Ancreaalng property t~ea. ~e I~11~ thlt
~d aoteAa~ SI3 mAllAon was paAd by re~aAl establ]aha,nta, ~d ~ of
tha~ waa paid by viaAtors= $12,357,000 ~ae ~d by reat~r~ntl, o~
~hAch 30~-40~ ~aa ~ld by vAsA~ors. He Anformed that ~t ~1 tht o~l-
nAon of the Chamber that a minimum of 20~ As paAd by the vAsAtorl to
CollAer County.
~r. Oatea ]ndAca~ed tha~ an infrastructure aurt~ Ia to
only to fund infrastructure projects. He noted that ~ recur
County po]~ indAcate, that a -aJorAty of the votera ~n~=ir~ flit
a ~alea t~ ~a fair ~ax.
sseee iqoc~Oez 3:08 P.M. - Reconvoned, ~,26 P.N. a~
Conlssloner Shanahan questioned what k~nd of tine frame the hrd
for referendum ~n November and the ~aa~b~]At~ of ~ttAng the
~2opmen~ Tax up for referendum In 8epte~r, to ~hJch
~anuar~ 18~ lggO
County Nanager HcLesore stated that there lo no great tine problem
involved if the general consensus la that there will be · referendum
Ln November. He noted that there are questions that need to be
resolved before anything can be done, noting that 90 day~ Aa needed
for public education. He stated that he ~ould hope that a decAl,on
·ade no ~a~er than Nay for the oale~ tax. He ~ndiclt~d that h~l
race,sedation ~u~d be ~o have the bed ta~ in 8eptea~r and the
t~ An ~ove=ber, ~hich ~eana ~hat a Hay decision ~u~d ~
Co~Iaaloner Hasse directed that Assistant County Nanager
establish the deadlines for both proposed referendums end
copy to the Commissioners end all Interested partSes.
Hr. Frank HcClAntock, Chairman of the Collier County School Board,
stated that the School Board is in favor of the one-cent Illll taX.
duced a comprehensive plan. noting that at the present tame there are
4.000 a~uden~a that are occupying portable classrooms. Ne noted that
addressed. He Indicated tha~ there ~a better than 8~ gr~h each
year ~d they clearl~ suppor~ ~he sales tax.
CouAssAoner Vo~pe questioned ~ha~ ~he to~a~ capAta~ ne~ are for
the School DistrAct for ~he next ten years, to ~hich Mr. NcC~A~tock
a~ated that ~t la dAgf~cu~t to project for a ten year ~rA~, noting
· ~on ~s needed fo~ the five yea~
D~. R~che~, Superintendent of Col~e~ County achool~.
~he f~ve-ye~/~ea-yea~ long ~nge p~o~ect~ c~]] fo~ I~9~.3
~ be 20.000 plus .~ud~ata ~nd ~n ~990-~99~. the P~o]ect~onl
~359 students. He Indicated that five y~m~ f~o~ no~
~a.53a ~tudents in the diet,Ica schoo]a of Co]lle~ County.
that An the next ten years, the School ~ard As oafely ass~ing and
· O00G
Page a7
~anu&r~ 18, 1990
projecting that there will be 38,292 studenta which ~eene th&t thim
achool district will grow 16,933 studentao He indic&ted that the
School Board la planning a general obligation bond imbue for the
apring of 1991 and looking ahead to the year 2000, another bond illVl
will be lsqulred during the year 1998. He indicated them the Ichool
Board intends to limit the total sd valorem tax to 1.5 mille £or the
combination of the flrot issue and the existing capital improvement
tax. He indicated that the second and larger bond tsaue wail require
approximately 1.! mills and will bm added to the 1,5 bond clpltll tax
for a total of 2.6 mills to fund the capital program to meet the needs
of the growing student population which wall reach 38,292 students An
the year 2000. He indicated that the successful negotl&tAons of the
Anterlocal agreements and the eventual passage of the one-cent sales
tax surcharge by the voters will offset the need for both bond le~uem
and will enable the School Board to limit its capital tax to the
current 1.5 mills, which is a savings of 1.i Rills ed valorem tax'to
our citizens. He stated that this savings equals over $228 mAC,ion
over the 20 year period of the anticipated bond issues that the School
Board would have to have. He noted that the School Board Is pllmled
to be considered as a sharing partner in the one-cent salem tax issue
mhd request that the Board adopt this report mhd amours tho voting
public that the School Boa~d ta prepared to use these funds to provide
the quality of education that is demanded and needed In the next
decmde. He stated that the Sch.o] Board urges that the voterm of
Co{liar County decide thio Issue.
Mayor Putzell of the City of Naples stated that four members of
the City Council approved in principle the concept of the one-cent
males tax rather than Increasing ad valorem taxes. ~e indic&ted that
at no time has the City Council established 1ts capital ~nfrmmt~otur~
/tens or the est/mated dollar amounts for inclusion in the &dvLsory
committee's repo~t. He noted that the City Council reserv~m the right
to make ouch determlt~&tlonn after this Board acta to put the Miter to
I referendum. He stated that he has no idea ma to the tal~ of ~mF~
OO063
for thu tax nor the percentage of revenues that nay go to the City of
Naples. He stated that the City has to have tam continuing freedom to
determine its ow~ priorities and to establish funding for ltl
and the ability to use general obligation bonds in the future #hen
approved by city voters. He noted that the funding portions of the
city end the county for projects of common Interest such le belch
rsnourishment, must be established between theme two bodies. He
Cared that every effort must be made to uae other altlrnatAvel for
funding growth related Infrastructure needs, such as impact feel and
tourist taxes.
Hr. Carlton Butler, Hayor of Everglades City, stated that he
agrees with the report of the Committee and supporting the Ichool
system. He stated that the one-cent sales tax should be I~tt out for
referendum An November because the voters are the ones that should
Hr. Harold Hall, resident of Everglades City and member of the
salem tax committee, stated that he would like to ese the voterl vote
on this matter. He stated that he originally thought thut the ntede
could be met with a half-cent tax for f~ve years, but after further
Investigation It was determined that there would be a need for & one-
cent sales tax for 10 years.
Commissioner Volpe questioned what part of the $4 ulllto~ that the
city of Everglades would receive would be used to fund deficiencies
within the five year Capital l~provement Element of the ~rowth
Hanagement Plan, to which Hr. Hall indicated that none of It would be
used for that. He noted that the capital Improvement portion of the
Orowth Hanagement Plan were the only figures that were publllhed to
the public. He Indicated that the County staff caul up #lth · lilt Of
pro~ects that were not In the Orowth Management Plan, b~t wire pro-
Jects that were needed.
Co~lssioner Vo]pe stated that the d~ecusaion la & one-Cella sales
tax to fund deficiencies in lnframtructure in the Ormeth ~n~g~ent
Plan. Rs stated that the City of Naples and tht City o~ ~f~rgladeo do
000 4
not have any exi~ting deficiencies.
Nr. Rall stated that the Growth Nanagement Plan alas et&ted that
there should not be projects in the Capital Improvement ~lelent unleel
the funds are available for those projects, He noted that tho
of Service that can be funded also has to be establllhed, which la&mi
that there could be desperate needs but if the funding ia not
available, the plan has to be written el those projects are not
funded. Re stated that this does not mean that it should not b~
the Growth Management Plan, but if there are no funds for it, thin it
. cannas be put In the Plan.
Nr. Bill Barton, resident of Naples, at&ted that he ie not one
that speaks lightly of increasing taxes but when & goll Il
then everyone must be taxed to meet that goal He noted this
school system needs additional money and education Il at ll~orta~tt &l
needed and ~t should be pu~ to ~ referendu~ vote and the
''will lake the final decision, which will eliminate any e~ It the
County level.
Mrs. Pat Carroll, Legislative Chairman for the Nap3em Arll
of Re~ltors, stated tha~ they are ~n favor of the one-cent I~11~
as A~ will reach the entire spectrum of the co~un~ty. ~ht
that f~da are need to maintain the level of living An this comity
that Aa needed and demanded. S:te noted that throughout the
the ~ople are making their ~holce with regards to a salem t~and she
Ae asking that the voters of Collier County be given that ease op~r-
tunity.
Nra. Charlotte Nestman, representing the League o~ ~o~ Voterl,
stated that the League has not taken a position at this tim, not~ng
that they have been working diligently on this ~atter and hav~ been
attending the various meetings, but a pro or con ~eitiou baa not ~n
established. She stated that they are ~n favor of having the ele~
00065
~anu&ry 16, logo
noted that they will help to educate the public with regards to thio
svbJect.
Mr. Alfred French, representing the S.#. florida Land Preservation
Trust, stated that they endorse putting the sales tax to & vote but
feel that the Committee's report should Include funding for open space
and also feel that the environmental and natural resources facilities
should be broadened.
Mr. Fred Voso. representing the Greater Naples Areo Civic
Association, orated that they have been on record for ~onths In favor
of the sales tax issue. He stated that ho feels that the money from
thio tax should be used to benefit everyone in the County and not Jset
certain areas. He Indicated that the issue as to what the money will
be used for needs to be resolved, but he feels that the ls~e sho~lld
be ~t on the ballot.
Mr. Nayne Sprouse, representing the Collier County ~Aldero ~d
Contractor's Association, stated that the CCBCA hmo over 900 ~~
and their organization does not create growth but reo~nd~ to tho
needs of the community. He stated that they are An favor of the
people voting on this issue aa they feel that it Aa a step An the
right direction.
eeo ~W Clerk Hoff~ replac~ ~W Clerk K~ at ~ t~ eeo
Col. John E. Beebo, Jr.. representing the ~~d Civic
Association, commented that he lo ~n favor of the One-cent ~cal
Option $aAeo T~. He stated thdt he concurs ~Ath tho re~rko Mdo ~
Messrs. Oate8, B~rton and Yeas. He ~ndlcated that ho Aa glad to oeo
the School Board participating, and hopes that the legal rulficationo
appropriate time since It 18 not enough to take o~aotlon8 from la~
de. lo. rs. He noted that Infrastructure 1n Collier Co~ty ham f8l~on
~hlnd, and the propooed tax MIll al1~ the people of Collier Co~ty
to contlnue to enjoy the ~allty of life they ha~ chosen. Ho Ittt~
that there 1o no hope of getting an addltlonal gao taa, and therefore,
It ~hooveu the County to pick up the burden which ohosld b e~Fl~
Page 41
January 16, lggo
valorem taxpayer of the burden that he ~ould other~lee hive to
He suggested that the voters be educated le to the reason why 6ch
ta~ Is needed.
Mr. Chester Dobeck stated that today's Besting his b~en vwry con-
f~clency In govarn~en~ and ~ha~ la ~o be done ~bou~ ltl t sails
but no idea of how such w~ll be generated fro~ 1~, and no ~dll o8
gallon ~ lm~sed In additional gao taxes to re,Ir the roadm.
Indicated that half of the property o~erm In Collier County who
ad valorem t~em go north for the mummer. He explained that he
hal/eves that m bed tax should be lmposed, and that the costs for
deto~ trash collection should be included on the t~
Hr. 1tm ~ans remarked that Jt ap~arm that the 10 melee
~ submitted to the voters, but noted that an entirely different
~estlon Is ho~ ~111 It be submitted to the voters? He ~ndlclted
~ essenkl~l step la this consideration Is the adoption of in
nonce creating a lC sales tax, subject to a referendum. HI
that a Citizens Advisory Committee ~as appointed three yelrl ago
study growth management, and 1~ months was spent doing thll.
advised that at the conclusion of the study, the Or.th ~nlgl~nt
Plan was presented and It provided for the kno~ capital n/ldl of
Collier County for the next five years, and It was fully f~dld.
Indicated that State roads ~re not addressed, but the deficit
needs are being discussed, the need~ ~hould ~ defined ~fore the
~ople of Collier County sign any blank check~. He ~nfor~d that
the need~ of the County are Infinite and they ~1~ n~r ~
He explained that there needs to be a cap on totll Cowry
divided ~tween that ~hlch Is funded by mmlms tmx mhd thmt ~hlch
Page
0006?
~anaax~ 18. lggo
b~ funded by ad valorem taxes. He stated that there should b~ ·
hibItlon against borrowing with sales tax revenue as security, other-
wise the sales tax ~ill disappear because berrying for ~re th~ 10
~ars results In the money being expended In Interest or debt le~lce.
He further noted that there should be a prohibition against the use of
sales t~ revenue being substituted for current funding. He
that the ~rlod for the sales tax ~ reduced to ~ years, and renal
If desired for another 5 year's, or Indefinitely as long as At
Ject to ~riodlc review by the people who will ~ ~ying the ~.
Mr. Egon Hill announced that he ia against the 1~ sales t~,
noted that he Is In favor si having a referendua so that the ~ople
can decide what they wish to do. He advised that the blue
even~ ~ha~ the aa]es tax dtd not peas. He Indicated ~ha~ one
on ~he da~a ohee~ wee ~ha~ o~ a moratorium on projects Aoca~ed on
Davis Bou3evard, certain sections oF San~a Barbara Bou3evard,
S~ree~ North. County Barn ~oad, Xmuoka3ee Road, e~c. He ota~ed
~hJo ~. some~hJng to be considered, and no,ed tha~ ~he needs
wa~er, o~r. ~rano~rta~lon and schools ~uAd ~ 3eosened. With
regard ~o ~he ~m~ac~ of ~he 3C oases tax ~o vJol~oro, he e~3alned
tha~ ~hA8 wAl3 be mAnAua~ since ~hey do no~ buy ~he bag ~lcke~
He e~]a~ned that he be3~eveo ~ha~ the addJ~Aonai 1~ .u2e.
a~ec~ ~he ~he lower and middle c~aoo peop3e o~ co231er c~n~y, and
wA2] no~ An any way afrec~ those ~hat can afford ~.
In ~.wer ~o OomnAoaAonet Vo]pe, Mr. McLeBore ota~ed tha~ At
appears tha~ 840-S50 nA3]lon An projects need ~o be ad,reseed l~
diately. He advised thlt Ideally, Staff ~uld prefer not to do any
long-term financing. ~e noted that there Rust be at least 10~
resets, and 10~ In financing coots.
Mr. Jim Nc~rath stated that It has been vo~ Invigorating to
on the Conlttee. ~e Indicated that growth does no~ pay fo~
He e~lalned that $1,900 la collected for connecting Mate~, ~d
is a 0660 Impact fee for the hoo~p. ~o noted tha~ In a~ao of tho
000(' 9
Page 43
January ~8~ ~ggo
County where septic tanks are used, there lo no lm~act fee. Re
explained that there is a 9369 impact fee on roads, and indicated that
this does not pay for such. He advised that Florida Consm~er Affairs
informd that the maximum amount that It costs to put down a road carl
b~ charged, and cited that this has been paid from ad valorel t~ee in
the
Nr. NcGrath reported that moat resort co~un~tAea char~ a ~d
t~, ~d noted that this ~uld take care o~ beach renourll~ent
Collier County. He stated that he has concerns ae to ~hy the 1~
t~ Ae needed. He indicated that there has been a 13~ lncrll~l
If Cowry Staff were taught to be frugal, Collier Count~ ~ld ~ the
~et operated county in the United States, He concurred that ~
aide agency should =snArer the various departments and aortaes An the
County. He suggested that the amies t~ Issue ~ put to a referenda,
and noted that this has been defeated ever~here An the State of
Florida after the budgets came out and the taxes ~re increased.
Hr. John Keschl stated that whatever the action of the
ia, At Aa the fate for the future. He Indicated that If the one cent
sales t~ passes for road Improvements, he ~All see to tt that the
area where he lives donates ~hetr roads to the County es that they c~
~ ~v~ first.
Nr. ~a~ Carlson stated that he disagrees ~Ath Nr. ~lll'a co~
·enta. He indicated that as a citizen of Collier County, ~d a~
· ca~r of the CCBCA, he hope~ that the Coa~Aa~lon endoc~e~ the
of the Sale~ Tax Co==Attee and put At on a referendum.
Attorne~ Dudley ~oodlette advised that on behalf of the ?
of the Coulttee who were In the majority, the num~rl~rl o~nch~
and revised, and they d~d not belleve that they ~re "wllh
Re indicated that $104 million ~rth of projects ~re ellllnatld
thanked the /nvaluable Input provided by Staff, the City of Naples,
the City of Everglades and the School Board. Re also th~ld
00069
Page 44
~anuary 18, 1090
of the cma·lites for their service, -
Couissioner Sounders ·entioned that there wa· a ten RoBber coB-
with 3 negative votes concerning the Local Option
but ali ·embers agreed that it should be placed on the ballot to give
the voters an opportunity to vote on this issue. He indicated that he
agrees with this. but noted that he believes a ~orkahop lhovld be held
to discuss the projects line by line that will be funded.
Commissioner Sounders BoY, d. aeconded byCounlaeloueF Volpo, 8~d
carrled~l~ou·ly, to thank the ~cal ~tlon lnfraotnc~ ~IH
~ ~i~u Conitt~, ~d to accept the ~o~lW ~d tb ~IW
~rt ~ ~t of the official records of Collier O~W.
Coati#loner Sounder· moved, ·econded byComalaaionerVolt~oto
schedule · workshop within 45 do,Fo, mad m publA~ hae~ing to bm mcbe-
dulmd two mks thereafter in the evening. Staf£ to provide m speci-
fi~ list of p~oJecta, sad Mh·t the operating and ualnteuam~ coots of
those in~ecta ·re projected to be, the recommended distritmtlmt o!
the tax among the various local
and a specific sho~lng of the deficiencies lit ce~taht
Couiseloner Ooodnight stated that with regard to the lnterlocal
Agree·eat, if she were & School Board ·ember, a City Council member
either in Everglades or Naples, she would be offended by this
Commission requesting a draft of the Agreement without being cart&in
that thio Issue would be placed on tho ballot.
Co~Jaleeloner Sounders indicated that Coulee/omar Ooodnight hal
made m valid point, but informed that ha hopes that the various
governments recognize the fact that all of thio ia important in the
decision making process, &s to what for· the ballot question will
take. He indicated that the School Board ia anticipating a larg~
amount of money fro· this sales tax, and he believe· that tho priuT
text of the lntmrlocs! agreements should be known.
Conieetoner Yelps stated that he concurs, and noted that there
ha· to be eo·e type of memorandum of understanding or some typo of
0OO7O
Page
~anua~Z 18~ lggo
Commisslone~ Sh~n~h^~ suggested t~at ~e Co~misalon ~1~1 t~l ~1~"
tlon to approve the Sales Tax Option for referendul, contingent ulmn
the ~orkshop reaults.
Colmtssloner Saunders stated that there ia no urgency 1~ Voting
Couls~lon votes today ~o place thll on the ballot In conce~t~
then l~ le determined In the ~rkshop tha~ there A~ no ne~ fo~
Dr. Richey, Superintendent of the School Board, Itltld that hA1
concern Aa ~ha~ if the needs of the other agencies are not
the $ch~l Board will proceed with a ~nd issue An lggl, and
another one In 1995 and 1996 since their needo ~lll not go away,
regardless of the Commission's decision.
E~rgladea City Hayor Butler indicated that he llrea~
a re~rt of his needs ~o the County, and he wa~ cut ~l lillioa
Co~isoAoner Shanahan lndAca~ed that hi feels that ~tting for
dayl for someone to give a specific dollar and cent amour fo~ the
lotion.
Co~lmsIoner OoodnJght stated that she does not feel thlt the
Co~l~]on can tell othe~ Boacds ~hat money they c~n o~ c~ ~ot
She Indicated that ~hen the Gcowth Hanagement Plan wl~ ~pp~o~d the
Co~J~Jon ~educed the Levels oE Se~uice so that cosplt~nc/ ~lth Co~-
~en~ could be met. She Jndlc~ted that the ~ttol line ~ thlt
~t noted that abe will still ~uppo~t the I~lel
Co~ls~ione~ H~ese Indicated that the 45 d~y~ ~lll h~ no
lm~ct on anything that has been done. He noted thlt It ~111
lve~yon~ the opportunity to kno~ the County*~
County M~n~ger ~rrl]l ~tmted that p~t of Co~one~
l~ge 46
O00?l
~anuery 16, lggO
·otlon is that he provide the level of deficiency for each project.
Jecte, but noted that It Hill be difficult to provide the level of
deficiency for beach renourlshment projects.
Com~l~sioner Saunders requested that Staff provide the
to the Commission approximately one ~eek prior to the ~orkohopo
Co~'ieeloner Saunders stated that he ~ould like to hav~ the
tunity to put together a cost reduction progra~ for the County,
ca~ot be sold to the public until they are convinced that
County Is doing everything that It can to reduce ~to comte, wher~
~i~ 4/1 (C~lmmionmr O~ight ~m~), t~t ~ ~ gl~ ~
nt~lW to ~t t~ther m cost rm~ctlon pr~ fo~ t~ ~,
~lt M~ to the Comlsston An 30 d~.
Co~isaloner Shanahan stated that he is In fm~r of ~ cost
Sion audit, but noted that he does have a problem In umlng It to
mpprovm or disapprove the sales t~ Issue. He mxprmmmmd that he
that the sales tax should be a referen~m to the ~plm, ~m~d on the
~rlt~ of the males tax.
Co~lsmloner Volpe commented that one of the recom~datlo~s o~
the ~Jorlty report was that the it~m of m ~d t~ ~ ~t on the
~llot.
~~l~r Vol~ ~ to ~t the im~e o~ m ~
Conlooloner8 Shanahan and Goodntght suggested that tho lone
the M t~ ~ discussed In a ~rkshop.
A discussion took place as to whether ConloolonoF Sanders
conflict or in ap~irance of a conflict on voting on this
w~rkshopped whenever the Commission desires, but noted that the only
strong recommendation from the Committee la that the Illll tu II0131
Coulsslon not to ~rkshop both irene et the same time.
c~l~ 3/2 (Cain. loners Sh~ ~d O~tght o~) to ~~
County Haflager Dorrtl] stated that he has concerns relatl~ to the
produc~lvlt~ study. He advised that la the late 197~e the Board
nloo~oned a productlvlty study that was done by the A. T. Kearn~
which was used In part la firing the then County Manager Dale
~nnlnghan; In the ~ld 1980'n t~ls Board commissioned an lnde~ndent
productivity study by the Arthur Young Co., that w~s used la ~rt
firing the then County ~anager Bill Nor~an~ and In 1985~ the
co.lesioned an Independent productivity study by the
Institute of Oovern~ent at the Onlverslty of South [lorldl~ that
~rt Included County Coenlssloners reading excerpts fron the o~ to
~e a ~otion to fire the then, County Nanager ~n Lusk. Be
that when County Co~lssloaers talk lo part about cre~tln9 ~n lnde~n-
dent productivity office to review only those activities si the
~ager, h~ cannot be expected to b~co~e over
County Manager Dorrlll called ~ttentlon to the
Ordinance. Section 1, ~lrst sentence Indicates thnt ~11
and all administration under the Jurisdiction of the kard of C~ty
Co~lesloners shall be the responsibility of the County ~a~r,
noted that he has always committed to do anything that the
An their ca~citv as ~llcy setters has directed has to do. ~t flot~
that the Board has not Indicated to bin the t~ of
t~t are desired for productivity. He stated that be has
000,-
Januar~ 18, 1990
about & single Co~aJasloner developing a prograa to propose ~11 Inde-
pendent productivity departBent that raporto to eoaeono other than the
County Nanager. Ha explained that he ia Dore than willing to ~ork
with Co~tisaloner Saundera ,
Comaiaalonar ~aaae stated that he has worked with
brought fo~ard to cut cornet's.
Co~ty Nanager Dorrlll stated that If the Co,Jeelon ~re to
~ through the revl~,. He noted that he ~ only elklng foe the
op~rtunlty to work ~lth the Commission, or undlrltlnd the t~
product~v~t~ prograa tha~ ~e desired,
Co~lseloner Saundere reported that hi his told Nr. ~rr~ll ~d
the Couloolon on several occasions that ho ~m not doing thio
of any d~ooat~ofactlon ~lth the Manager, but because ho ~3Ao~o that
there are op~rtunities for th~o County to oeve Boney, Ho mtit~ tht
~t can never hurt to have another pair of eyes ~ooklng at oomo of the
procedures end programs to see ~f they are o~rat~ng e~ efficiently
~sslble. He advised that the worst ~h~ng that will h~p~n thr~gh
County Nanager Dorrtll Indicated that he has gr~ve concernl
crea~lng an lndependent or new department ou~slde of the County
~nager 0rdlnance ~ho ~rk, dlrectly for the Board. He luggllt~ thlt
County Attorney Cuyler review the ordinance to eeo If t~tt Il
blllty.
Co~lealoner S~unders requested that County Attorney ~1~ ~
vide him ~lth a copy of the County ~la~glrtl 0rdlnenct ~d liked
seeee ~l~.cee?, a,4o P.N. - Reconv~ned~ a,ao F.N. at ~bich
TaBs De~mtT Clet.k [enyon re~laced Deputy Olezk I~of~Mm eeeee
0007,1
~anutz. y 18~ ~ggo
'lgOO-lOOl BUD(TIT PO~XCY ACCePTeD AHD FFXNAL BUIxIrT ~LX~ ~ ~ ~
8~vlng money es It relates to this year*o pro~sed bud. S ~ll~,
at&ted that he lo proposing that currant service budgets In the coming
~ ~ c~p~d ~t ~ ~hlch lo tho r~te of Inflation this
leans to ~gree upon. He noted that this ~uld apply to Ill
that the PaY-for-performance system be capped et 7~ o~ groom
Nh/ch Is slightly more than the rate of Inflation but It gl~s the
County the ability to offer sliding scale ~y Increases ~rom tiro to
lO~, He stated that he lo also pro~olng that ex~nded mo[vlcol k
limited to only the Increase In ~d velore~ funds that lo ett~l~tlbl~
to n~ construction and no windfall ~uld be used from
reeooeoo~ento, which wes the leading concern on the ~t of tho
~ Romeo group. He Indicated that expanded me. Ices In otho~
ohodld only ~ ~llowed to the extent them the~e 1~ gr~th In that
tlcule~ fund. adding that there ~ould bo no n~ Fovenuom
with that. He stated that a ~tter budget format Mill ~ de~lo~d to
clearly show the Increases In taxes. In budgets, end to differentiate
~t~en o~ratlng budgets and c~pital budgets, He re~rt~ this ho
has developed e quality Improvement program which 1~ ~llt off 8
pr~r~ that was cre~ted fro~ e Je~neoe model that lo In use ~ tho
Florida Po~ and Light Cor~atlon, He noted that thio pr~ h~
~en highly muccemoful In other a~e~s, He Indicated that he his
~rked with three different citizens ~$th regards to the ~d~t ~d
t~em for this year. H~ stated that he Is requesting this this pFell-
mlna~ budget policy be accepted,
Conlooloner Vol~ ot~ted that If this ~ll~ ho ho roo~
citizens.
Co~ty Nenage~ ~rrlll stated them the n~ pro~em
· <O00OO
January 18, lggo
new construction. He indicated that if there is a self-an&lydia to
lave money, then that eared money can be applied to ~pr~fl~ Ills,
He noted that this only applies to his agency. Ho noted tht tho
thing ~h~t he ~l~l not be able ~o control ~ unfunded 8tiaa o~
~ .~ Conlooloner Volpe questioned If this lo l~nlted to the
roll~ thio prncedure?
first ~ek in February. He noted that at that tJae, the ~ard can
suggest that othe~ agencies follow these
Commissioner Shanahan stated that he has a letter from the
Island T~pa~ers Association that indicates that the ~d~t ~h~ld
limited to a 3~ cap, plus inflation. He stated that he ~u~d
thi~ preliminary ~licy.
Mr. Ira Evans stated that no on~ knew anything a~ut that
until yeeterda~ and he ~uld .uggee~ that this ~tter ~ contA~.
~e stated that a pay-for-perforaance program not to exceed ?~ of the
total ~yroll Is over S4 million.
Co~ty Manager Dorrlll stated that the P~Y-fo~-perfor~ce
Ilwa~ ~en budgeted as a percentage of gross
N~. Ev~ns stated that pro~ectlng revenue fro~ ~ sales t~ that
not y~t ~n voted on Is poor practice.
Mr. ~rrlll stated that t~ls reference Is only lntend~ to
sent one-h~lf of the fifth cent that the County cur~sntly
adding that It Is used l:~ n~v~r~l fund~ ~,, ~ ~,~s n~ re[erence tO l
fut~e m~les t~.
Mr. ~anm stated that this la the ~ay he lB reading It &e ~
vldual ~d there are ~ny people that kne~ nothing a~t this,
Pag~ 81
oOOo!
~auuory 16, lOgO
posed fiscal policy ~111 be offered during the first p~rt of
Coutsstoner launders stated that the recouendation is thor thio
policy be accepted and presented on January 30, lggo, se pitt of
budget ~llcy; therefore, no final action lo ~lng ~8kon thio
Mr. ~rrlll stated that any policy c~n ~ changed of 81to~od
the final policy comes before the Board.
Conlssloner Sh~nahan stated that he fully supports this ~11~
It lo putting a cap on the budget ~nd reducing spending, ~t
Increasing Impact fees end user fees.
~lul~e~ S~~ ~d, seconded ~ Conlosta~
~ ~t t~ ~rt ~d b~lng the fl~l ~d~t ~11~ hok ~ tb
Mr, George Keller. President o~ Collier Covnty Clvlo Federation,
fo~ e~lo~eo concerns him. Ils stated that the lncrelsl pi
zero ~o 10~, noting that If a person does not ~t a raise, they oh~ld
~ fired and questioned how many employees are rated excellent?
Flnence Director Yonkooky stated that the ~ lo leal t~ this
~ceuae there ere legally mandated Increases, noting this thoro
~ · FICA Increase. He stated that the 7X lo not lctually what
glen to ~he employee.
M~, ~r~lll stated that there lo ~ step grade mec~l~ ~d ~
eBployeeto salary can ~ locked, adding that of the 964 ~oplt thlt
~rk fo~ him the~e a~e only one o~ t~ that ~re it top or gFldl,
30~ of tho total work force ~111 ~ eligible to get 10~ ~d tho rest
will get lees than that, He mtltod this the success of the pr~rlm
that the people that do the most, get the aGeS,
';'" ~ ~1 f~ the ~ti~, t~ ~tl~ c~ld
.
Cowry Nanager ~rrlll at.ted that this Is a reco~ndltio~ to
3anuary 18, lggo
and Rescue District whereby the County Is under contract to collect
Impact fees that were created an a result of the Special Act of the
Legislature An 1987, adding that the County le proposing to chlrge
them I~ for administration &nd overhead, He indicated that there hmo
been a challenge as to whether the County can do thin, noting that the
agreement Js being recommended for approval.
County Attorney Cu¥1er stated that the litigation Aa a relatively
anal! la~uit and if the County la going to collect these fees, he
~ould lake to see this Agreement considered and passed.
C~erk Gl/es stated that he JB curiou~ is to ~hy the C~nty needs
to ~y interest on collections durJng the month ~hen the C~ty ~ea
collectlona for State agencies and the~ do not receive 1atereat. Re
stated that the County ia only charging 1~ and the T~ Col]actor Aa
collect/ag for epecAal ~sses~menta An the County and he char~a 2~,
adding that he feels that the Jntereat As am unneceaaa~ burden on the
Co~ty.
County Nanager Dorrlll stated that hJa ~aa a negotlated prov1~1on,
notAng that he does not feel that strong about it one ~y or the
other. Re stated that At might be good practAce ~cauae the fare
distract Aa cash ~or and Af the County can ~y them Interest on thei~
~ney ~rJng the tlae that It l~ held, At may ~ a gom) conaideratAon.
Co~ Attorney ~yler stated that the DAstrAct had eo~ conce~n~
At the~elvea, but Am order to serve the public, ~nag,~nt has
dec~ded that the one-atop shop ~1 not ~rk If eve~ne has to ~ all
~r the Cowry to pay ~heir fees, therefore, this Agreement ~ he~
tasted.
Clerk Giles stated that At ~1 be a dlfflcult cal~lat~ ~4 the
Cowry ~y ~ ar~/ng a~ut it for years. He etated that the C~W
Am pro~bly undercharging for the co13ectlon effort .l~h the 1~ f~.
Page 83
Coulosioner Volpe questioned if tho Fire District Il ogt*eoobll to
~uying the administrative charge, to which Mr. Cuyler replied &ffi~-
liitlv~,l¥, adding that the Agreement has s~ready been executed.
Opon c&ll for the queerish, thO B orlon ctT~led 4/0, (CV2UILIOOIOne~
:.~' 8i-andez~ out of the zoom).
January :16. 2990- · ~:
County Hanager OorrJJl .tared that thJ, ~tea ~, contJnued from
t~ ~eka ago, noting that It has to do with a change order for the
MS~ that the County ahould attempt to prlvatlze. Re Jndiolted that
to bid ~d the County ~uId be bette~ served ~ ~Jng to the
orders of taking on the right-et-way and the easements and ~ to bid.
vat,zing the Naples Production Park project because tt la & ~d
~h]nd this one and the County w]]~ have an op~rtun~ty to d~]op
~, solicit p~opoeala from developera, rank the deveJo~rl tad then
negotiate a contract.
Commissioner Shanahan stated that this le simply the fina1 l~Ya~lt
that the County ham been charged for the additional work for Pint
Ridge lndustrla! Park.
Nr. Dorrlll Indicated that the payment only relates to the d#iga
services that are listed on Page 26 of the executive
~n ~"~r to Co~ss]one~ Vo~, Hr. ~r~ stated that
result of getting the final orders in March, the County will h~ to
go through the condemnation proceea on aJ] the r~ghtm-of-wmy,
that ~lnt, the County will be ready to award a conet~ot~on
~d arrange financing to get the project out of the ground.
which ~. Ton Peek of ~llson. Hiller. ~rton. Sell l
matted that the achedule calls for advertising for bide In the ~nth
of Aprl~ and the award In the neath of Hay and then
~ started ~n July.
00101
Peek stated that they hava near charged the County interest
o~r to the A~nt for P~emol~l ~~ ~o~ PI~ ~
~~hl ~k ~ a~~ with the deletl~ o~ tb ~~ in
County ~aneger DorrlI~ .toted that he hem been ~rklng with the
C~erk~m Office on thio mat~er to try and get m better ~egm3 Interpro-
t~ee of contracts that should be brought to the Board, adding that he
has been following the County ~rchaoAng Policy and An the e~nt that
the Co~ty legal staff does no~ give a legal opln~on or At l~ con-
tested by the Clerk's office, then he ~uld have an obllgat~o~ to
admit that he should not have been executing the contracts ~d tho
~rchao~ng Policy should be amended. He noted that these are tho
~ contracts that are outstanding; one ~ for 03,000 ~d the other
for $6,000 which ~re for managing consulting engagements that ho
authorized and there As an obligation to pay because the p~Jectm are
complete.
;' ~A~ 4/0, (~Amml~mr S~dm~ ~t of t~ ~), ~t ~ ~
.R~9~:I~I~A*XOM 90-17 CORR~CTXRG U~DIRPA~q~HTTO THE CX'X"~OF~
Finance Director Yonkooky mtmted that Shim Atom wmm $nclud~ An
the agenda ~cket, but tt ~ee Anadvertently left off the a~n~ amble
of contents, ~hlch demlm ~lth mpprovml of m rmmolutAon fo~ dA~
moment of fundm for m local optlon gmm ta~. Re moated that h~ ~
· 0010
4/0° (Commissioner 8aundere o~t o£ the
lte~t~ ~d~d to the agenda,
that the City of Everglades le entitled to this l~Y~snt ~nd
Is ~lng recommended,
Pln~ca Director Yonkosky ~teted that the ~rtment
~l~tm 9~17 ~ct~ng the ~de~t to the
~1~ dlltrl~tion of the IiX ~t 1~ll ~tl~ ~
~t of ll~l~3.a~ ~ adoptd.
City of ~erglades Ha~or But/er stated that he ~uld
the Cooleelon present at the Everglades Seafood feetl~l ~d the
check presented at that alee by Coaeleeloner OoodnJght. Re etltd
that the County has been ~rklng w/th them and giving them 100~
~ratlon.
001o5
RI:SQL~CYW 90-19 RKAPPOIWTII~ PETER 14I:WRILL JOri) RIClIARD IX2ZJMORI TO
~ X~L~ 0F ~A_~'WX FXW~ COWTWOL DXS~RXCT A~,~80W'f ~,~X-~z-~ -
Coumioelone~ Shen~hen moved, ,,conded by Co--~,,lon,~ Ooodn~ght
end e~z~ied 4/0, (connloolone~ S&unde~o out of the z~m), that
Reool~tiou gO-lO z~eppolnttng Pete~ I~%'riZ% end Riche~d 8kiduoz~ to
ooll.t
Page 80 ~'~ .,.
Itl3OLUT3:0N ~-20 ~K:)ZNT~:N~ .?&Ntt' ~~, ~ ~~, ~
R~lutl~ ~20 a~tn~lng 3~e~ Kaln~ch, ~21 Ho2~, ~
· Aala, hid ~en, ~lla ~n~2~. ~ Rtd~, ~k ~, ~
~ RAo~, Alex~dra ~2eck~. ~d 12izabth ~ to tb
bh~ B2u RAb~ Tuk force Ad Boo ~ltt~ b ~t~.
3anuary 16, 1990-
Coulsaloner Yelps stated that thin Item Felatea to the
£.- Commioa/on~ Interest In directing Staff to prepare a lobbying ordi-
nance end at the emma time, there la alas moue discussion about tho
possibility of an ordinance that would address employeem who 2eavl
government service and their ability to appear or lo,hying. He stated
that he ~ould like to have thio item continued for one weak, but
~' lake the Commissioners to give moms thought to the utter.
~. eel ~lm~Aonmr Seundera returned to the mting at thAI tilm
*~ ItI~ILUTXOM 90-21 AUTHORXZIN9 THR COLLIER C0UNTT HOU~r]I~
~ ~ A~~ A~) ~ lWTO AW IFrERL0CAL A~ WITH ~&Iq~ZA ~
~omm~aelo~er Qood~lght moved, ae~o~d~d I~/ ¢omm~aa~ous~ Vo~, t~mt
Items/uriah 90-21 authorizing the Co/liar County Rousing FAnmnce
Aut~orit~ to enter Into an Inter/scsi agreement with amcanbte
llmminOFlnamc~ AuthorlWbe adopted.
Conalaaloner Volpe questioned why Eacamble County Al being outmtl-
tuted for Lee County, to which Attorney Donald Plck~orth, representing
the Collier County Housing Finance Authority, orated that the counties
ere being changed because or the rears of the various lenders dye to
~ drop in the interest rate, noting that the amount or money that they
have subscribed to has been 2ower than expected and bec&uae of that,
the total proposed size or the issue Aa going to be emmlle~ mad An
order to have one issue big e~tough, both Lee County and ColZAe~ County
are going in with Sacambia County. He orated that the only thing title
changes Al the name of the County, noting that everything mill il
exactly the same.
~~ Clm~-~p on ~um~ 20, 1990, ~
melee ~J~F to appall of the Conm~t A~n~, Co~L~A~m~
S~ $ndLcmt~ that he ~l~ m lettm~ ~ the
~co Xml~d Civic Association o~ing the ~
~hanahan and carried vnAnluovsly, that the following Areas
under the Consent Agenda be apprmmd and/or adopted, eeeee
Item m14&I
J~YXOI MXTll C.~tM~, DRESSER &lid MCKEI, l~. REGAROZII~ ~~
l. Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit aa me~ri~
~arantee completion of the Subdivision impro~aentm.
2. Authorize the recording of the final plat of
3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Conmt~ctAon
~aAntenance Agreement.
4. That.no.Ce. rtlficatew o.f Occupancy be granted until the
requ~rea Amprovementa nave received pre3imInar~ &cceptmncm.
FflAL PLAT OF
1, Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as oe~iW to
~arantee completion of the Su~lvlolon $aprMmen~m,
Authorize the recording o~ the final plat of "~ly ~ref~t
~mch, ~lt Four*.
Authorize the Chairman to execute the ConatructAo~ al~d
Ptm/ntenance Agreement.
That.no_C~rtif$cate? o~ Occupancy be granted until the
requ~reo lmprovemen~s nave received preliminary acceptance.
AOJ~BBEIXT WXTH MARXA AWD IE~C~StJJ~O R~WXZ FOR PAllqI:NT Off WATIR STSTKM
XtmmelCD3 - #ithdraw~
for P~O~SSSXONA~ mmXBl~RXm2 IIRVZOn WZTH
ASSO~X&TES, ZR~,, fOR ADDXTXONAL gORE ~ OM THR
ZXFR~ DXSTRZCT P1K)JlP~ A]f1~ CtX(PL~XON OIf ~-~
See Pages
XtmmPl4D6
BXDeOg-I404 AZJtPORTROAD#ATB:RTRA~SSXOMMAZNPROJ~-JI~TO
STZVEI:I AND LATTORo XWC, ZR THE AJqOalrr OF 8348,107.89
Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily NM on
November 26° 1969, aa evidenced by Affidavit of Publication £11et with
the Clerk, bids were received for Bid #89-1494 for construction of
Airport Road Mater Transmission Main Project until 3:00 P.M., December
20, 198g.
TOO~TJZXIOLIU) IXILNZNATXON OfT HZ BUFTXCXKI~MrOFBf~iDaOFCOUMTT
See Pages ~_.~_~~
LIASI~ ~l'l't~l:R BOARD Of COOWTTCOIMXSszOmSANDMARSTIX
LIAIII~ CORPORATIO# fOR CONTXNUID USE Of &NOW OrffXORAT 419IORTll
8TY, XET, X)IEOKALII, BT KRS, PUBLXC HIALTH UNXT (WOMIX, XJWA~TAND
CUXLIW SOPPLI~AL FOOD PRO(JZLMI)
See Pages
Xtem~X~3
ZlZ~:~C~ f0~-23 Aa'ZlXORXZXZI~ T~ ~XOR OF ~ A~q]~N]DIT~ FOR
. O.A.~. L&XD W TI~TST CONVZTI~ TO GOLZXIX GOONTT ~!' AVATAR
001
Jan,&Fy 18, lOgO~. ,~
COOHTY C130~XBSXOIFERB PROVXDXI~I FOR A NONTII-YO-.PlOFrll ~roR&oI LIASI flOR
XT1041 FROM THB
Xteu #1415
........... AZ~ AWl;) KXi~XTXOM, XlfO..
30.96 ,~C:RK9 TO opERATE A FAXROROOHO F&¢XLXTT
RI~:G~TXQW P~0-34 I:~TA~-~XSHXHV TOUR BIW PAT TXTLI8
comacT WXTH THE FLORXDA DEPAR'rJ~ OS' CmOmWXTY AJTAX'RS lrOR mUtWT
rmm8 ulmmt TEa 1OmO,..O0 Loc&r, OOVZRIM~ LMm DEVlLO~ RA'm~TX0g
&tSXWTAI~ PR0q~
Xt#
CIRTXffXC:ATB:S O~ CORRICTXON TO THE TAX ROLL AS Zv/~S13r11~ B~ PROPZlKTT
APPRAX~Im
1989-98/100
112 - 115
117 - 122
~ge9 TAN~XBLE P1~RSOWA~ PRO~
lg~g~
I/3/oo - 1/8/00 ''
11/30/80 - 12/20/89
22/31/80 - ol/o8/go
un row
04049, 6097~. 4034~
SEre Pagef~ ~ ·
FOR RIPRI~KWTATX3~ HAMICXMB TO X~~ A B~ ~~
See Pagea ~
OOl
r
There being no objection, the following mlscellaneoue oorreal>on-
dance was filed and/or referred ae Indicated below=
with regards to negligence claim against Collier County.
~en Cuyler: Risk Man~ge~nt~ ~nd Flied.
2. Le~ter dated 1/3Z90 to the Honorable Burl ~. iaundlrl, frol
Pau~ R. Bradsha~. Director. Division of Resource
M~nagement, DCA. advising thmt the ~A will send I ~tpTlll~-
t~tlve to partIcJpate ~n the January 9, 1990 public he~ing to
· dopt the p~o~sed plan mmendsent to the Co~l~e~ C~nty
Nanagement Plan. xc: ~e$] Do~$~%= F~nk Bruit=
been sent to Stun Lltslnge~, Director. Orowth ~mn~g~m~nt)]
Fl~ed.
Notice of Public Hearing Norkahop from DER dated 1Zll/90
regarding workshop to be held on ~anuary 22, 1990, at 10100
a.m., in Tsllahassee to discuss and receive public coumentl o~
the proposed designation of new elate and federal perkl, x=t
Nell Dorrlll; Frank Bruit= Bill Lorenz] and Filed.
Copy of letter dated 12/15/89 to Mr. Clifford Crawford,
D/rector of Parks and Recreation, from Hr. ~lrl~P B. Green,
Ill, Director, Division of Beaches and ShOrel, Dh*R, re notice
of violation, cease and desist unauthorized construction
sea~ard of the Co~stal Construction Control Line, Fill Number
KXM CO 0065. xc: BCC; and filed.
Notice dated I2/15/89 from DN~ of Approved Peri,t, Perli~t
02174 and 02176, and 02175 Collier County to
Parka and Recreation Department, re Lely Beach Park,
Nell Dorrlll: Eevln O'Donnell; and Filed.
Memorandum dated 12/19/89 to all the Commissioners, from
~ane Polkowskl0 HR$ Public Health Unit Director, ri distrib-
ution by Co~missloner District of septic t&nk
failures, aids cases, temporary food lei'vici par~itl,
standing food service establishments with enforcement actionl
resulting tn fines or closure, xc: Each CoLmiaeloner) Irld
Flied.
Agenda for 1/9/90 Os;den Gate Parkway Beautification Advleor~
Couuuitteo meeting an~ minUtll of December 12 1989, lilting.
xc: Filed. '
Agenda for 5/25/89 Collier County Fire Consolidation 8tm
8. Group meeting and minutes of 5/11/89 meeting with
status survey, xc~ BCC~ and Filed.
9. Notice of Rearing from PSC dated I~/22/e0 to Flor~d&
Light Company and all interested persons, Docket
8go3lg-Ez-Hlnlmum Filing Requirement Report of FlorAd&
and Light Company In compliance with Section S~6.08(~).
weXl Dorrlll: ~en Plneau, Frank Brutt~ and Filed.
Notice to Owner dated 1/4/90 to BCC from Gulf
Inc., under an order given by Nentco, Inc. EPA ProJict
2059?020, Collier South County Regional #aero N~te~
Facility, advising that they hive provided air conditioning
equipment, xc= Nell Dorrlllj 8kip Cemp~ end F~led,
,001O4
Page 86
3enuer~ 16, 1090
11.
12.
13.
Notice to O~ner dated 1/2/90 to BCC from The Burke Co** under
an order given by Florcan Erectors, advielng that they have
provided services/materials for sale and rental of building
aaterlele for the Oovernuent Center of Collier County, xot
Nell DorrIll: Skip Camp~ end Flied.
Letter dated 12/29/89 to Bob Blanch&rd, Chief Pl&nne~, frol
BaR J. Coldlng, Property Appraiser, re Collle~ Couftty Ormeth
Kan&gement Plan. xc: aCC; end Flied.
Letter dated 12/22/89 to Ken Cuyler, Enquire, Collier County
Attorne¥'e Office, from Hugh D. Reyee, Admlnletr&tive J~dgo,
T~ntleth Judicial Circuit of Florida re courthouse eecu~lW.
xct Filed.
There being no further buelneea for the Oood of the County, the
Beet/ngwee adjourned by Order of the Ch&l~ - Tlmoz 6:~B P.M,
BOARD OF COUNTY CONNX88ZONER9
BOARD OF ZONXI~3APPRALS/IX
OFFXCXO OOVIRNXNQ BOARD(8) OF
9PBCXAL DXgTRXCT9 UHDRR XT9
CONTROL
MAX A HASSB, J~t., C]Sdt'IRMAN
approved by the Board on
or ae corrected