The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 03/19/2015 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA MARCH 19, 2015 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M.,THURSDAY,MARCH 19,2015, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER,THIRD FLOOR,3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES— February 5,2015 and February 19,2015 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Note this item has been continued from February 19,2015 CCPC meeting: A. PUDA-PL20120001128: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 92-23,the Wilson Professional Center Planned Unit Development (PUD), as amended, by amending Section IV, Permitted Uses and Standards to add a 150-foot monopine communications tower and related facilities as a permitted use, to increase the maximum height for the communications tower to 150 feet and add setbacks for the communications tower for the PUD property located at the southwest corner of Airport-Pulling Road and Bailey Lane in Section 23, Township 49 1 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl,AICP] B. PL20130001767/CP-2013-10: An Ordinance amending Ordinance 89-05,as amended,the Collier County Growth Management Plan of the unincorporated area of Collier County Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series by establishing the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District to allow a Residential only,Commercial only or Mixed Use project at the following density/intensity: up to 7.3 residential dwelling units per acre for a maximum of 224 residential dwelling units, up to 250,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 150 room hotel at a floor area ratio of 0.6 and an assisted living facility at a floor area ratio of 0.6. The commercial uses allowed by right are all permitted uses and conditional uses in the C-1 General Office through C-3 Commercial General zoning districts in the Collier County Land Development Code,with conversions and limitations if project is developed as mixed use development; and furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located at the corner of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail East) in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 30.68± acres, (Companion PL20130001726) [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,AICP,Principal Planner] C. PUDZ-PL20130001726: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD)zoning district for a project to be known as the Vincentian Village MPUD,to allow construction of a maximum of 224 multifamily residential dwelling units,up to 250,000 gross square feet of commercial land uses, and a hotel limited to 150 rooms and a 0.6 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and an assisted living facility(ALF)at 0.6 FAR.The commercial uses are subject to conversions and limitations if the project is developed as mixed use or if a hotel or ALF is constructed. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 30.68+/- acres; providing for the repeal of Ordinance Number 99-37, the Vincentian PUD; and by providing an effective date. (Companion to PL- 20130001767/Petition CP-2013-10) [Coordinator: Kay Deselem,AICP,Principal Planner] D. An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, The Collier County Land Development Code, by amending Section 5.04.05 Temporary Events, to allow Temporary Events on Collier County property without a permit; providing for conflict and severability; inclusion in the Collier county Land Development Code; and an effective date. [Caroline Cilek,AICP,Land Development Code Manager] 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation regarding expansion of the County TCEA [Coordinator: John Podczerwinsky, Project Manager] 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp 2 AGENDA ITEM 9-A Co Mr County SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING& ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION HEARING DATE: CONTINUED TO MARCH 19, 2015 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20120001128: WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PUD Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Review Staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). A preserve requirement did exist in the CCME during the time of the original PUD document (92-23). The preserve requirement has been in the GMP since 1989 and in the LDC since 1991. Therefore, it is consistent with the GMP for this site to retain a preserve requirement. Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. The Environmental Considerations section and PUD Master Plan have been revised to reflect the Preserve that was retained in accordance with the original PUD document. Further, the site plan depicts the impact the existing Preserve area. The existing preserve has been on the developed site since the property was developed in the early 1990s. The monopine will be placed within an existing preserve area. However, this will not bring the PUD below the minimum preserve acreage required. The minimum required preserve acreage is 0.51 acres; 1.69 acres is being provided. This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project meets the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, a deviation is being requested. Co 6Y County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING& ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2015 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20120001128: WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PUD PROPERTY OWNER,APPLICANT & AGENT: Owner: Agent: South Fla. Growers Assn.,Inc. Lauralee G. Westine, Esq. 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Law Office of Lauralee G. Westine,P.A. Miami, FL 33126 800 Tarpon Woods Boulevard, Suite E-1 Palm Harbor, FL 34685 Applicant: SBA Towers III, LLC 5900 Broken Sound Parkway NW Boca Raton, FL 33487 REQUESTED ACTION: The Wilson Professional Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) currently permits office and medical office uses. The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission(CCPC)to consider an application for an amendment to add a 150-foot monopine (monopole support structure, designed to resemble a pine tree) communication tower as a permitted use. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is 8.29+ acres in size and is located in the southwest corner of the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road and Bailey Lane. The site is currently developed with offices. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposed communication tower would have a maximum height of 150 feet and be a monopole structure to support communication antennae with added structures designed to resemble a pine tree. Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 1 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC roy MI El i _ alai d .� i lik -.* t z *Pr 1 Ail W_ yy iilotir -44i 1 9 Ira 4° * GD V W =!t= ___ r _s•Al I J •JOYrL Q . IMO I1 TIL(VJ pc w) WOW an"w-4.11041m Q C :::::1'•::1::a::04:hh1,:01111,:1¢1' . - - N a. il:,'...1.1.3./...1.1.1.1, .0¢ ,)F "1:,::1L1,:,,,:,3:•Q" ::;:,:::1,11 �� 4:•,•1.:.:!:.,!1 :•:.,.:.:. : gin• ©®0 . ::::h,1:11,1::1:1:4f•11:00:#R:,:O::,:1 AVM C-R ::6:1144@,,,•. -2 ! ! �, �y� - Argil S = - z OCIPA-41„, 0B , •, �oa�a 1- N! hill trap e y0© as ©0©©iir4 ©� � *" *AN ; , :G4 ►©° life v � o�v°�i ova� i�� 44,40_41,44 _�' A,"rte{e� q N w II Q C o�1014 _ ❑ 7M a . z cdv;,flf>U■s4vOsYe alnvs O itn 11. it m a 5. 14 g 1 11" LU LU 1 J !g s µ'i1Y199LN1 [-31Mt 5131ei P .RI a .1711 il 13 21I illu i� 4 q . :° r1 ' = _ Re $ COMM CL 1 gi RI Li ELI:e o a-_- 1 z wo tm19ow, 1 . ! al I :ri le A ) it d - I 1_____ _ a _ pp ., II -.::'M i;--,"■-(;:g phi 311 ---11 , I 1! II I 0 9 1 111 is 13VOIJ .11,1,,10,41,14 l , iii prk U nil I ! t_ I o� 18 ' in \ - iLiiVh a fir.od vuY..y�.3ll31lIJp�. • NI 1 al y ,,,„eJI et y�ry' — f n E Y QQ �� n i,scroo1 M.9M A-311310000 F -1 R ILL S 114 1 414141 . . 7p e _ F ■ ■ SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Bailey Lane ROW, across which are medical offices zoned C-1 and undeveloped land, zoned A. East: Airport-Pulling Road ROW and canal ROW, across which are a golf course and homes, zoned MPUD (Grey Oaks). South: Homes in the Poinciana Village subdivision, zoned RMF-6 West: A church, zoned A .. 14. t X 1 I ' 15`' `t '.tv I , \:',, \ 1 `X 'i l i t 1 � 0-7 h 1 ..0. 1 ‘ { X �r 1 400 .a 1 1;t ti t. ., 1 , e L 1 i et A,j, - lilltet' A, ..,. .. • v7JK _, k:', '4, iK t � Slo, „osfa, •I,\' ■ \ � 1 _ -. . . .. .,. . ....,_ \,,, - ,, ..• 4...)... , y ..,.. ,____ ., • . , .,..- - ki Aerial Photo(GoogleMaps) Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 3 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC 1 i GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The Wilson Professional Center PUD was determined to be consistent with the GMP at the time of the original rezone. It is Staff's opinion that the proposed amendment will not affect that consistency determination; therefore, Staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with 1 the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP. ANALYSIS: The applicant wishes to add the use of communication tower, along with three supporting deviations,to the permitted uses in the PUD. I The applicant states that the tower is required to cope with heavy phone and data demand in the area. Staff analyzed the application, including effects on wildlife, distance from residential areas 3 and visual impact. Staff considers visual impact to be the greatest concern. The applicant has requested a "monopine" tower, a monopole structure, designed to collapse on s: itself, limited to 150 feet in height. The "pine" feature of the "monopine" includes branch-like structures which will hide the antennae and create the illusion of being a tall pine tree. The applicant has provided photos (attached)including"before" photos and"after"photos—with the x rnonopine digitally edited into the photo. 1 Staff believes the monopine structure will ameliorate the visual impact to the greatest extent E possible. f Deviation Discussion: i Please see attached Deviation Justifications provided by the applicant. Deviation 1 —A deviation from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3 Required Setbacks to Preserves. Justification— The Wilson Professional Center PUD was approved prior to the preserve setback requirement in the LDC. This deviation memorializes that the PUD is not subject I 5 to this requirement. f Deviation 2 — A Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.09.G.2.a separation distance of a communication tower from residentially zoned property. o Justification — Since the LDC Communication Tower language was written, technology s has improved so that a monopole tower collapses upon itself. In addition, the tower, as well as the "branches" are subject to building code wind-load requirements. Staff believes this justifies the deviation from the 2.5 times the tower-height requirement (150ft. x 2.5 = 375ft.). The closest residential property is 232 feet from the proposed tower. t Deviation 3—A deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02 Buffer Requirements i ir S Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 4 of 10 g February 19,2015 CCPC - x 1 Justification — The requested deviation would reduce the internal landscape buffer from the required 10-foot Type "A" to 0-feet, utilizing existing vegetation to buffer the tower from the rest of the PUD. Since the buffer is internal, requested by the applicant, Staff does not object to the deviation. FINDINGS OF FACT: 3 This PUD Amendment qualifies as a Substantial Change under LDC Section 10.02.13.E.I.b "a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development." PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment and believes that the addition of a monopine communication tower will be less visually conspicuous since the site is currently vegetated with pines and will not have a major visual effect on surrounding properties and infrastructure. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Unified control was established at the time of rezoning and continues through the present time. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Staff has reviewed this petition and has determined that this amendment to add a communication tower does not affect the PUD's consistency with the GMP, therefore, Staff is of the opinion that this petition may be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The only proposed change is the addition of a communication tower and Staff believes that the approval of this amendment will continue to be compatible with the surrounding area, subject to the existing development standards and project deviations. S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 5 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC I t i Usable open space is not affected by the proposed amendment. 6 The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. It is Staff's opinion that the addition of a communication tower as a permitted use will not affect public or private facilities beyond what was approved in the existing PUD. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. I The applicant states that a tower is required in this location due to high data usage. Staff understands that with changes in technology, including smart phones, additional towers and antennae will be required in the area. Since the subject PUD has existing pines, this 1 expansion appears to be reasonable. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9 The proposed amendment is consistent with PUD regulations, with the three proposed ,p deviations, and seeks to meet a desired purpose of serving the surrounding community with phone and data service. i Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations from the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered proposed ' r change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): k. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, &policies of ill the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. V I The addition of a communication tower does not affect the previous determination of i consistency. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP. 1 2. The existing land use pattern, 1 The existing land use pattern was reviewed and approved at the time of the original rezone. 3 The proposed amendment will not substantially alter that pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; 1 No new districts will be created through this amendment. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. { i This amendment will not affect existing district boundaries. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning i 1 3 Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 6 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC 1 1 i i 1 necessary. x The petitioner states, and Staff agrees, that changes in technology make the proposed amendment necessary to provide phone and data service to the area. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; 1 There will be visual impact to the neighborhood. Phone and data service is also desired by many in the neighborhood. As a result, Staff believes that the monopine features of the t tower wil lessen the visual impact on the neighborhood. 1 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. { A communication tower is typically unmanned, visited routinely for maintenance, and will not affect the level of service on Airport-Pulling Road. k 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; i The PUD has existing buildings and an existing water management system. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; Due to the nature of a communication tower, it will not reduce the circulation of light and air. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; ,, f! This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results,which may be internal or 1 i external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by many factors including zoning; however,zoning by itself may or may not affect values,since value determination is driven by market conditions. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; 1 Since the Wilson Professional Center PUD is existing,the proposed amendment should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. I! 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; The proposed development complies with the GMP which is a public policy statement 1 supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light 1 of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 7 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC 1 1 1 1 i M1 with existing zoning; The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing land-uses; however, the petitioner believes that the addition of a communication tower to the currently permitted uses will support the surrounding community with expanded phone and data service. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; As noted previously, the subject property is already developed; the PUD rezoning was evaluated at the rezoning stage and was deemed consistent with the GMP. The GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban-designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Communication towers are, by nature, area-specific. In order to provide service to the community, antennae must be located at certain specific intervals. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. This project will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. This petition has been reviewed by County Staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the PUD process and Staff has concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the 11CC during its advertised public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC)REVIEW: The CCPC sitting as the EAC is not required to hear this petition because no environmental issues were identified. Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 8 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): Two NIMs were held for this petition. On May 9, 2013, a meeting was held at the Wilson Professional Center, No members of the public were present. Because of a "hold" status requested by the petitioner, and additional staff review, another NIM was held on January 16, 2015 at the Fleischman Park Community Center. Three members of the public attended. A NIM summary and sign-in sheet are attached. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: This Staff Report was reviewed on February 3, 2015. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA-PL20120001128 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. 1 Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 9 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC PREPARED BY: ,t,,,f/ -3-/S FRED REISCHL, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: U. AA_____ ---- Z 3 I( RAYM D V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE PLANNING&ZONING DEPARTMENT MIKE BOSI,AICP, INTERIM DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: j ;- NICK G' S LA N C ► NGUIDA ADMINA T ATOR DATE GROW MANAGEMENT DIVISION Tentatively scheduled for the April 14, 2015 BCC Meeting Wilson Professional Center PUD, PUDA-PL2010001128 Page 10 of 10 February 19,2015 CCPC — ---- ------ --- — —'— ) BAILEY LANE — ---- 10' NATURAL VECETATJON BUFFER �,1. , \- ` fl LV '.„_,/\ r,/i _ fl 1 N I • I —PRESERVE I PRESERVE s' I 40 1 I I <1 ' PRESERVE I m ro NAPLES 1st CHURCH - NAZARENE INC I N COWER COUNTY aa ZONING: D rn INSTITUTIONAL-CHURCHES 193 y OR 975 PG 656 I O BUILDING PARCEL A " \7y ` 0 ` I0 6 I 5 /PROPOSED 150-0"SBA MONOPINE ii i g `► I C-11').--; 1 I --- Boundary_— + j a } Z -PRESERVE II 1 n Existing 6' Fence PRESERVE Et_ • with 5' Natural o Vegetation Buffer r 7 >' tn 3 1, ,l( "v .,,.. ` 'v, f( '` ,^-fir Y', I ONEILI PARTNERS DAVID F. EUGENE& YVETTE JOSEPH M TORY USA ") THOMPSON MARTA HARDY DALETO SUSAN ADAMS LLC TRUNCALLE COLLIER COUNTY 7 COWER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY COWER COUNTY COWER COUNTY < COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY EL ZONING: MFL10 ZONING: MF110 ZONING: MFL10 ZONING: MFL10 ZONING: MFL1O w ZONING:MFLID DR DR 4759 PG 1369 ZONING: MFL70 OR 4892 PG 1321 OR 4508 OR 3484 PG 969 4766 PG 375 = 1640 PG 457 OR 1366 PG 1286 PG 2025 w 3 6 g ( SITE DATA p TOTAL SITE AREA: 6.13 AG w PRESERVE REQUIRED(3.4 X.15): 0.51 AC V PRESERVE PROVIDED: 1.69 AC/ 4 O NOTE: 3 5 1.PRESERVES AREA USES ARE GOVERNED 6Y SECTION 5.61.1. J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. WILSON PROFESSIONAL PROJECT#: 13414-1 5 23150 FASHION DRIVE,SUITE 242 FILE DATE: 7/2014 inujiminii ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 CENTER — PHONE:(239)405-9148 DESIGN BY: SCF 0 50' 100' FAX:(239)288-2537 MASTER CONCEPT PLAN SEC.23,TOWN. 49S,R.25E SCALE: 1" = 100' /.. WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM EXHIBIT A FL.COA#29226 SCALE: 1"=100' Wilson Professional Center PUD Deviation Justifications I` Deviationl: Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07(H)(3). Justification: iF The existing PUD was approved and the improvements were developed prior to the above LDC 1 requirement of a setback of 25 feet for principal structures and 10 feet for accessory structures. The existing site plan and any revisions to the existing site plan would be exempt from the preserve setbacks currently within the LDC. Deviation 2: Deviation#2 seeks relief from the LDC Section 5.05.09.G.2.a, which requires a 375' setback for the tower from all residential property, calculated at the height of the tower multiplied by 2.5, to allow a 232.4' setback from residential property to the South. Justification: The goal of this section of the LDC, inter alia is to "...minimize, where applicable, adverse visual impacts of towers and antennas through careful design, siting,and vegetation screening; to avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from tower failure..." However, these sound planning objectives have been met and exceeded by the design of the proposed communication tower. The proposed communication tower is carefully designed to be camouflaged as a tall pine tree, with all antennas contained within the pine tree's "canopy" making them obscured, and all cabling contained within the tree's "trunk." Finally the proposed communication tower is designed not to fall, but instead yield at a predesigned point. If this happens, the top of the communication tower will fold over within a 34' radius, which is completely within the parent parcel and protects neighboring residential properties,the nearest of which are 232.4' away, from any potential damage. Deviation 3: Deviation#3 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.06.02, which requires a Type A 10' buffer, to allow no landscape buffer between the tower tract and the rest of the PUD. In accordance with the LDC Section 5.05.09.G.21 existing native vegetation will be used to the greatest extent possible to produce a 10' natural buffer without an opacity requirement. 9 Justification: Deviation Justifications rev 1 Page 1 of 2 T i { The existing PUD was approved and the improvements were developed prior to the LDC requirements of Section 04.06.02. The communication tower has been sited to maximize the use of existing vegetation, landscaping, and buildings to buffer the communication tower from the balance of the PUD. Commercial buildings are located to the Southeast and Northeast of the proposed communication tower. The existing PUD is heavily vegetated and shall remain so after the development of the communication tower. The proposed communication tower has been sited so that it will not alter or expand the vehicular use area, nor will it change the building square footage of the PUD. There are no known discontinuances of use of the PUD lasting for 1 year or more since the PUD was completed. The goal of section 5.05.09 of the LDC, inter alia is to "...minimize,where applicable, adverse visual impacts of towers and antennas through careful design, siting, and vegetation screening; ..." This sound planning objective has been met by the careful siting of the proposed communication tower. A Deviation Justifications rev 1 Page 2 of 2 i PUDA-PL20120001128 ti TRANSCRIPT OF NIM HELD ON 1-16-15 AT 6:00PM REPRESENTATIVES: p: APPLICANT: LAURALEE G. WESTINE, ESQ. LAND OWNER: RICHARD YOVANOVICH, ESQ. COUNTY: FRED REISCHL MS. WESTINE INTRODUCED HERSELF, STATED THE PURPOSE WAS FOR THE BAILEY LANE COMMUNICATION TOWER, STATED THE DATE AS FRIDAY JANUARY 16, 2015, TIME AS 6: 02, AND THAT SHE REPRESENTED THE APPLICANT, SBA COMMUNICATIONS. SHE DESCRIBED THE TOWER AS A 150' MONOPINE TOWER. SHE HANDED OUT EXAMPLES MONOPINE TOWERS IN HILLSBOROUGH AND PINELLAS COUNTIES ALONG WITH PHOTOSIMULATIONS OF THE PROPOSED TOWER. SHE EXPLAINED THE BALLOON FLIGHT PROCESS FOR MAKING PHOTOSIMULATIONS. SHE EXPLAINED THE APPLICATION AS AN AMENDEMNT TO THE WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PUD. SHE THEN GAVE THE ATTENDEES COPIES OF THE PROPOSED MASTER PLAN FOR THE PUD, THE PROPOSED TOWER SITE PLAN, AND A PROPOSED ELEVATION OF THE TOWER. SHE STATED THAT THE ANTENNAS WILL BE HIDDEN BY THE TOWER' S BRANCHES. SHE STATED THAT THE TOWER WILL BE ABLE TO SUPPORT 4 SETS OF ANTENNAS. SHE STATED THAT AT&T WILL BE FIRST TENANT AND THAT THERE IS SOME INTEREST IN THE TOWER FROM OTHER CARRIERS. 1 1 AN ATTENDEE ASKED WHO SHE REPRESENTED AND SHE RESTATED THAT SHE REPRESENTS THE APPLICANT, SBA TOWERS. SHE EXPLAINED THE TOWER' S COLLOCATION CAPABILITY AS A "VERTICAL APARTMENT. " SHE STATED THAT THE Page 1 of 4 TOWER AND ITS BRANCHES WILL MEET THE COUNTY' S WIND SPEED REQUIREMENTS . SHE STATED THAT THE TOWER WILL BE PAINTED BROWN AND GREEN BY SBA, THAT SBA WILL MAINETAIN THE TOWER AND LANDSCAPING, AND THAT THE COUNTY HAS THE ABILITY TO REMOVE THE TOWER IF IT WERE TO EVER BECOME NON COMPLIANT. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT THE PUD IS THE "WILSON CENTER" AND THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS SOUTH FLORIDA GROWERS ASSOCIATION. SHE THEN DESCRIBED THE USES OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS GENERALLY AND SHOWED THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED TOWER. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT SHE' S OFTEN ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT RF EMISSIONS, GUIDED THE ATTENDEES TO THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY AND THE FAA'S WEBSITE, AND OFFERED TO PRINT THE INFORMATION FOR ATTENDEES WHO COULD NOT ACCESS THE INTERNET. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT, AS A GENERAL RULE, CELL TOWERS EMIT ROUGHLY 1/100TH THE ENERGY ALLOWABLE BY THE FCC. MS. WESTINE WAS ASKED ABOUT THE HOW MUCH OF THE TOWER'S SUPPORT POLE WILL BE COVERED BY BRANCHES. MS WESTINE STATED THAT THE TOWER WILL HAVE A "MEDIUM DENSITY BRANCH" AND DISCUSSED VARIOUS QUALITIES OF BRANCH DESIGNS GENERALLY. AN ATTENDEE ASKED WHY THE TOWER HAD TO BE LOCATED WHERE IT WAS. MS. WESTINE DESCRIBED THE CELLULAR GRID AS A "HONEYCOMB" WHERE THE It TOWERS HAVE TO BE LOCATED CLOSE ENOUGH TO "TALK" TO EACH OTHER. SHE ALSO STATED THAT AS DATA REQUIREMENTS OF CELLULAR USERS INCREAS, THE COVERAGE AREA OF CELL TOWERS GENERALLY DECREASE. AN ATTENDEE ASKED IF THE TOWER WOULD BE LIGHTED AFTER DARK. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE FAA TO ILLUMINATE THE TOWER AND THAT THEY DO NOT PLAN TO UNLESS REQUIRED BY COLLIER COUNTY. MR. REISCHL STATED THAT SINCE THE TOWER WAS NOT IN AN APIRPORT ZONE, IT WOULD Page 2 of 4 NOT NEED TO BE ILLUMINATED. SHE STATED THAT THE COMPIOUND WILL HAVE SECURITY LIGHTING. 'k. ANOTHER ATTENDEE ASKED IF THE PROPOSED TOWER WOULD PROMOTE THE LOCATION OF RED WINGED HAWKS TO THE AREA. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT SHE DID NOT KNOW WHETHER THE TOWER WILL CREATE A DEMAND FOR A PARTICULAR BIRD IN THE AREA BUT SHE STATED THAT THE TOWER WILL COMPLY WITH THE FCC AND THE FLA. DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFE TOWER RULES FOR BIRD SAFETY ALONG WITH THEIR PROCEDURES FOR MAINTAINING THE TOWER IF BIRDS CHOOSE TO NEST ON THE 3 PROPOSED TOWER. ANOTHER ATTENDEE ASKED IF THE TOWER' S CONSTRUCTION WILL TAKE PLACE DURING BIRD MIGRATION SEASON. MS. WESTINE LAID OUT A ROUGH TIMELINE FOR THE PROCESSES THAT FOLLOW THE MEETING AS 4 TO 6 MONTHS UNTIL CONSTRUCTION CAN BEGIN. SHE STATED THAT FULL CONSTRUCTION TAKES 3 MONTHS BUT TOWER ERECTION TAKES 6 WEEKS. SHE GAVE A PROJECTED "ON AIR" DATE AS FIRST QUARTER OF 2016. ANOTHER ATTENDEE ASKED IF AN ENVIRONMENTAL Ig ASSESSMENT WAS CONDUCTED FOR THE SITE. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT A "NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT" OR "NEPA" ASSESSMENT WAS CONDUCTED FOR THE SITE AND THAT SHE COULD MAIL A COPY TO HIM IF HE WANTED. THE ATTENDEE REQUESTED A COPY AND MS. WESTINE TOOK DOWN HIS ADDRESS. ANOTHER ATTENDEE STATED THAT SHE WAS IMPRESSED WITH THE PROGRESSIVENESS OF THE DESIGN. SHE THEN PROCEEDED TO DESCRIBE THE REASONS 1 THAT SHE WAS IMPRESSED WITH THE DESIGN. ANOTHER ATTENDEE ASKED IF ANY PART OF THE ANTENNAS WOULD PROJECT OUTSIDE OF THE BRANCHES. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT IT WOULDN'T. THE ATTENDEE THEN STATED THAT HE WAS FAMILIAR WITH THE INDUSTRY AND THAT THE DESIGN WAS BETTER THAN THE MINIMUM. MS. WESTINE STATED THAT SBA ATTEMPTS TO FIT THE DESIGN TO THE AREA AND Page 3 of 4 • 3 DESCRIBED THAT THE MONOPINE DESIGN WAS SUPERIOR TO A FLAGPOLE BECAUSE THE FLAG WOULD GIVE THE TOWER A MUCH LARGER PROFILE THAN THE MONOPINE DESIGN. MS. WESTINE THEN OFFERED HER CONTACT INFORMATION TO THE ATTENDEES AGAIN IN CASE THEY HAD ANY FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS AFTER THE MEETING. MS. 4 WESTINE RE-ITERATED THAT SBA WILL BE BOUND TO THE DESIGN THAT IS APPROVED BY THE COUNTY. MS. WESTINE STATED THE TIME AS 6: 35 AND ASKED IF SHE COULD CLOSE THE MEETING. HAVING NO OBJECTION, SHE DID SUCH. iy 3g� ftp to ii bb[ 3f Page 4 of 4 1 3 Sei-sA Cr' . .3Li itie2:b 361 9, Pdmictielmel • • • 7 cou,tiry I z/67 • TY.10k) +-1Artzs, tg.L.1NJ ii ReischlFred From: Richard Eddy ichardtedd mail.com Y[ Y @s l Sent: Wednesday,January 21,2015 3:19 PM To: lauralee @westinelaw.com Cc: ReischlFred Subject: Proposed Bailey Lane Tower Dear Ms. Westine, t Lauralee, ii Thanks for your open and friendly presentation at Fleischmann Community Center on this proposal. Confirming my request,please send me by surface mail,ASAP,the CD(or DVD) of the Environmental Impact study about the existing wild life and flora in the vicinity of this proposed Cellular Tower. You said it was lengthy and would be best sent by mail for me to see on my computer. I use a macbook. As I mentioned I am not convinced this is the best place to put such an obtrusive tower in this neighborhood. As my family has owned this home for 45 years in beautiful Naples,I am sorry to see such a totally unacceptable tower being put in my back yard adjacent to an area where NOTHING would interfere with the environment. At the meeting I asked about how the building of the tower would affect nesting and migration patterns in the 9 area. My home is on the canal directly behind the church's preserve bordering on the tower site(probably less than one city block!). While you discussed various aspects of how long these things take, I do not recall your answering my question. I would hope that the actual building of the tower,if approved,would be sensitive to these natural factors, but I did nor receive any assurances of that being done. Just that there was a 500-odd page study,that would take several weeks to read. Of course, if and when the Proposed Tower is approved,the actual timing of construction could be done to MINIMIZE any nesting or migration patterns. However,it seemed that the firms wanting to use the tower did not have this on their agenda. 5 How will the builder respect nesting and migration patterns at time of construction? I look forward to hearing more about how this important money-making communications tower can enhance(or at least blend with, and NOT detract from)the natural beauty and wildlife of Naples,Florida where we are so fortunate to live. Richard Eddy 3019 Poinciana Drive Naples,FL 34105 PS I doubt that Mr. Fleischmann who was a strong promoter of Naples(promoting the Zoo, and giving land on which the meeting was held,and selling the neighboring Freedom park area to the community)would have been in agreement with putting such a tower in our midst. 1 Collier Mosquito Control District 600 North Road, Naples, FL 34104-3464 irk_ - Administration: 239-436-1000/239-436-1005(fax) Hangar: 239-436-1008/239-436-1007(fax) www.collier-mosquito.org Mr. Reischl, The Collier Mosquito Control District(CMCD) identifies the locations of all towers,within Collier County,to prepare for aerial treatment missions. Recently, we learned of a new tower on Bailey Ln. which will be constructed in the near future. CMCD has no safety concerns with the Bailey Ln. tower at this time. Regards, 9oAn eppezzato Director of Operations Collier Mosquito Control District 600 North Road Naples,FL 34104-3464 239-436-1000 main# 239-436-1005 fax john,q cmcd.org i r Board of Commissioners: Executive Director. Spray Schedule: 239-436-1010 David Farmer, Chair Frank Van Essen, Ph.D, Jackie D. Fresenius, Secretary Immokalee Substation: Bob D. Geroy, Treasurer 195 Airpark Blvd John F. Johnson Immokalee, FL 34142 Linda McDaniels 239-867-3200 ORDINANCE NO. 15- 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE ;? NUMBER 92-23, THE WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTION IV, PERMITTED USES AND STANDARDS TO ADD A 150-. FOOT MONOPINE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER AND RELATED FACILITIES AS A PERMITTED USE, TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER TO 150 FEET AND ADD SETBACKS FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER, AMENDING SECTION V, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS TO REMOVE WATER MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS, AND REPLACING EXHIBIT A, THE PUD MASTER PLAN, WITH A REVISED PUD MASTER PLAN, FOR THE PUD PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD AND BAILEY LANE IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 28, 1992,the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 92-23,the Wilson Professional Center Planned Unit Development(the"PUD"); and WHEREAS, the Wilson Professional Center PUD was amended by Ordinance Numbers 94-24 and 98-21; and WHEREAS, Lauralee G. Westine,Esquire representing SBA Towers UI, LLC,petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD to allow for a 150-foot monopine communications tower and related facilities and to add additional setbacks. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: Amendment to the Cover Page of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.92-23,as Amended The Cover Page of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: See Exhibit"A",attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. [12-CPS-01192/1159093/1]Words double underlined are added;Words strrusle-through are deleted [12-CPS-01192/1150329/1] Wilson Professional Center PUD PUDA-PL20 120001 128—3/5/15 13 SECTION TWO: Amendment to Section I, Statement of Compliance, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23, as Amended Section I, Statement of Compliance, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23, as amended,is hereby amended to read as follows: The purpose of this section is to express the intent of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc; 3200 ,t Road Napt Bailey Larne-at -i-r-pe es, Florida 33912 South Florida Growers Association, Inc,; 800 Tarpon Woods Blvd.; Suite E-1, Palm Harbor, Florida 34685, hereinafter referred to as applicant or sponsor, to develop property located in part of section 23, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this proposed development shall henceforth be known as Wilson Professional Center. The development of this Planned Unit Development will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan and other applicable documents for the following reasons: SECTION THREE: Amendment to Subsection 2.1 of Section II, Property Ownership and Legal Description, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23, as Amended Subsection 2.1 of Section II, Property Ownership and Legal Description, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23,as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 2.1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently owned by Wilson, Miller, Barton&Peek, Inc; 3200 Barman- . -:.- :.-, .: - , erida 33942 South Florida Growers Association, Inc. SECTION FOUR: Amendment to Section IV, Permitted Uses and Development Standards of the PUD Document of Ordinance No. 92-23, as Amended Section IV, Permitted Uses and Development Standards of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23, as amended,is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION IV 1 [12-CPS-01192/1 159093/1]Words double underlined are added;Words struck through are deleted [12-CPS-01192/1150329/1] Wilson Professional Center PUD PUDA-PL20120001128—3/5/15 PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS * * * * * * { 4.2 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure,or part thereof, shall be erected, altered,or used,or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a) Offices and medical offices with a maximum of 72,000 sq. ft.limited-to two buildings, and subject to the following limitations: ti 1. Emergency medical clinics are prohibited. 2. Medical office uses are limited to a maximum occupancy of 17,396 sq. ft. 2) Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a) Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this district. b) Caretaker's residences in accordance with applicable County regulations. c) Essential services as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code. d) One (1) 150' Monopine Communication Tower and Related Facilities 4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1) Maximum Number of Parcels: Two building parcels. 2) Minimum Setback Requirements for Principal Structures: a) Internal road easement or front yard—25 feet.. b) Side Yard- 15 feet. c) Rear Yard—25 feet. d). PUD Property Line-50 feet in which no parking is permitted. e) Preserve— zero feet principal and accessory structures. A deviation from section 3.05.07(H)(3) of the LDC requiring a 25 feet setback for principal structures and 10 feet for accessory structures to allow a zero feet setback for princi sal and accesso structures is •ermitted in recognition of the then existin' Growth Management Manleg uirements for native vegetation retention at the time the original PUD was approved which did not require a preserve setback. [12-CPS-01192/1159093/1]Words double underlined are added;Words struck—through are deleted [12-CPS-01192/1.150329/1] Wilson Professional Center PUD PUDA-PL20120001128—3/5/15 } } 3 7 i 5 3 3 i t 13 Mono.ineC.mmuni , '.l . .e ,n• t- , -. . . '- I1-v- ...01- . ,..,__d_ i The Monopine Communication Tower, and all related facilities, shall be enclosed by an 8' tall,opaque. architecturally finished wall and located on the proposed tower tract, shown on Exhibit"A". The Monopine Communication Tower shall be set back from the property lines as follows: North 442'2"; South 229'6";East 610'3"• We.t 4 ' " All re ated facilities other than the Monopine E Communication Tower, shall be set back from the property lines as follows: i North 402'9"; South 190'7";East 570'8"; West 20'1". I 14) Deviations for Man..ine Con m _I. ,ti. T.w- i i Deviation#1 Seeks relief from the LDC Section 5.05,09.G.2.a,which requires a 375' setback for the tower from all residential imp&Ity,calgiated at the height of the tower multiplied by 2.5,to allow a 229'6"setback from residential property to 3 1 the South. : I Deviation#2 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.06.02 Cl., "Buffer Requirements,"which requires a Type A 10-foot wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center,to allow a 0-foot wide landscape buffer between the tower tract and the rest of the PUD. Deviation#3 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.06.05 B.2.c., "General Landscaping Requirements,"which moires site without native vegetation to have a 15-foot wide landscape buffer with minimum code size trees located 25 feet on center and a 3-foot high hedge planted 3 feet on center,to allow a 4-foot t wide landscape buffer. 1 q SECTION FIVE: Amendment to Section V, General Development Commitments, of 1 the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23,as Amended 1 Section V, General Development Commitments, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23,as amended,is hereby amended to read as follows: i 2 SECTION V i GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1 1 * * * * * * 5.4 PUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN i i [12-CPS-01192/1159093/1]Words double underlined are added;Words struck gh are deleted [12-CPS-01192/1150329/1] Wilson Professional Center PUD PUDA-PL20120001128—3/5/15 2 3 1 a. The PUD Master Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"A" ( ilsen iller;-Earten, Soil&Peek,Inc.,Drawing File NO. RZ 151A)is an illustrative preliminary development plan. * * * * * * • • P 1 i • . • regular meeting of July, 1987; and ha: . : - • - •.. ... •- - - . 1 stipulations: • ‘4. • • • - mcnt Plan and detailed site drainage p1 . . - .- : to the County Engineer for revi-- . -•-• .. . - • _ . • . until-approval of the pro:: -: . : • . . ... - . . . • . •• granted by the-County-Engineer. If there is a problem with the Staff Review of the submitted plans, the project is to be brought back before the Environmental Advisory Beard 13,---Prier to the initiation of any project co-- -. •-•, - - • "Poinciana-Village-Gordo • - • . • " • _. -•-• s --• _ - . di-sc-harge or-make-appropriate-i-prevem- . - - • • : • _. necessary-b-y-the-Cennt eer. No building permits for the project will be granted above described i- . . .•- . - . . .. : .. - . • . . . . _ . _ . . .: _ e' _. •-••• or the 660' section of the outfall ditch currently-in-need of maintenance. 5.76 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS a--bite clearing-per-inrit-review-preeedures shall be in accordance with section 3.9.6 efthe-Collier-Eeunty-Larva-Development Code. •b. The use of native sp •- •• .. - .. . .. . - • . - -.. -- • . .. 2.1.1.1 of-the-Collier County Land Development Code. c. Prohibited exotic vegetation removal shall be performed in accordance with section 3.9.6.6 oft-- - . .. - 9- -- j d. Proee-lures-regarding-an -hi-sterical or archaeological sites identified shall be in aecordancewPit eeti: . . ... .. : 9- ..-. [12-CPS-01192/1159093/1]Words double underlined are added;Words struck through are deleted [12-CPS-01192/1150329/1] Wilson Professional Center PUD PUDA-PL201200011.28-3/5/15 t I I e i i i e: , .. :. •----:.- • -- . .. :: _: . , •. , Dry f retention/buffer areas surrounding the parcel will be an average of at least 36 feet I i in width. Final design of the dry retention/buffer areas should incorporate I retention of the maximum amount of native vegetation possible, and final designs will be subject to the review and approval of the County Project Review Services Environmental staff. This condition is conceptually depicted as Preserve Areas 1 on the PUD Master plan and shall satisfy all native vegetation retention requirements. i I l l o .. • . . n .. . . _ _ _ g b.Petitioner should investigate using rock or paver bricks for roadways and F parking lots in lieu of traditional use of asphalt paving. I 1 SECTION SIX: Amendment to Exhibit "A", the PUD Master Plan, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92-23, as Amended 1 1 Exhibit"A", the PUD Master Plan, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 92- 23, as amended, is deleted in its entirety and is hereby replaced by Exhibit"A", attached hereto i i as Exhibit"B"and incorporated herein by reference. i F SECTION SEVEN: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County t Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this day of ,2015. I r I i ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 1 By: By: ,Deputy Clerk Tim Nance, Chairman 1 I [12-CPS-01192/1159093/1]Words double underlined are added;Words stfuslk-thrsugh are deleted [12-CPS-01192/1150329/1] Wilson Professional Center PUD i PUDA-PL20120001128—3/5/15 1 J I 5 Approved as to form and legality: ---1 Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—PUD Cover Page Exhibit B—Exhibit"A"PUD Master Plan 1 CP\12-CPS-01192\3 { [ fi g�g [12-CPS-01192/1159093/11Words double underlined are added;Words stud rough are deleted [12-CPS-01192/1150329/11 Wilson Professional Center PUD PUDA-PL20120001128—3/5/15 Ll EXHIBIT A WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT P U DA-PL-20120001128 8 Acres Located in Section 23, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida REVISED: PREPARED BY: Lauralee G.Westine, Esq. Mattaniah S.Jahn, Esq. Law Office of Lauralee G.Westine, PA 800 Tarpon Woods Blvd.,Suite E-1 Palm Harbor, FL 34685 Date Reviewed by CCPC Date Approved by BCC Ordinance Number Amendments and Repeal EXHIBIT"A" Words underlined are added;Words struck n- gh are deleted is TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE -1- SECTION II PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION -2- SECTION III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION -3- i I SECTION IV PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -4- I SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS -5- SECTION VI EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS [12-CPS-01192/1159092/1]Words underlined are added;Words struck are deleted 3/5/15 SECTION I [ STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of South Florida Growers Association, Inc.; 800 Tarpon Woods Blvd., Suite E-1, Palm Harbor, Florida 34685, hereinafter referred to as applicant or sponsor, to develop property located in part of section 23, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this proposed development shall henceforth be known as Wilson Professional Center.The development of this Planned Unit Development will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan and other applicable documents for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the Urban Residential Land Use Designation as identified on the Future Land Use Map as required in Policy 5.3 of the Future Land Use Element. 2. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's proposed uses as required in Objective 2 of the Element. • 3. The project development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding ■ land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use'Element. • 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 5. The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.h.and 1.of the Future Land Use Element. 6. The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management as far as is practical in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element. [12-CPS-01192/1159092/1]Words underlined are added;Words stFue—k- ,rough are deleted 3/5/15 ii li 7. This, PUD has been deemed "improved" as defined in the Collier County Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (90-23). Therefore, pursuant to Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan(GMP),this PUD is consistent with the GMP. yd¢ e5 [12-CPS-01192/1159092/1]Words underlined are added;Words struck gh are deleted 3/5/15 SECTION II PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION jS { 2.1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently owned by South Florida Growers Association, Inc. 2.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property is described as follows: Parcel 1: NE Y4 of SE%of SE 1/4 of NE% less east 100' right of way, less north 30' right of way. Parcel 2: W/z of SE%,of SE 1/4 of NE% less north 30' right of way. Parcel 3: 5E1/4 of SE%,of SE%of NE% less east 100' right of way. All located in section 23,Township 49 South, Range 25 East,Collier County, Florida. Also see Map of Boundary Survey WMBS&P File No.4G-662. [ i [12-CPS-01192/1159092/1]Words underlined are added; Words struck through are deleted { 3/5/15 1 SECTION III STATEMEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 INTRODUCTION il It is the sponsor's intention to create a professional office park with associated support facilities. 3.2 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE ORDINANCES a. Regulation for development of Wilson Professional Center PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document,together with sections of the Collier County Land Development Code and Ordinances in effect at the time of Final SDP application,to the extent applicable ordinances or codes do not conflict with or restrict development rights, development conditions, and development mitigation contained in this document or the Development Order.Where these regulations fail to provide development standards,the provisions of the most similar district in the County Land Development Code shall apply. 1 b. Unless otherwise noted, herein or in the Development Order,the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of future development order applications. 3.3 LAND USES The arrangement of land use types is shown on the P.U.D. Master Plan. Minor changes and variations in design and acreages shall be permitted at final design to accommodate topography,vegetation,and other site conditions.The specific location and size of individual tracts and the assignment of building area thereto shall be submitted to the Development Services Director for approval,as described in Section 3.3 of this document.The final size of the open space lands will depend on the actual requirement for water management, roadway pattern,and building unit size and configuration.The usable open space requirement of 30%for the project shall be met. Calculation of open space shall not include small strip landscape islands in the parking lots. 3.4 RESERVATION OF NATURAL VEGETATION AND TREE REMOVAL Clearing,grading,earthwork and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with applicable Collier County Development Codes, and the standards and commitments of this document. ] ] [12-CPS-01192/1159092/1]Words underlined are added; Words str-Hek-thfeugh are deleted 3/5/15 , Ir 3.5 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES Easements shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be needed.Said easements and improvements shall be in compliance with applicable sections of the Collier County p Land Development Code. All necessary easements,dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable 1 regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. 3.6 EXCEPTIONS TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS The following requirements of Division 3.2 of the Land Development Code shall be subject to review by the County Engineer prior to construction plan preparation and submittal under a submission pursuant to Section 3.2.7.2 of the Land Development Code. 1. Division 3.2.,Section 3.2.8.4.1 of the Land Development Code: Access.(All access shall be in accordance with Ordinance 82-91). 2. Division 3.2, Section 3.2.8.3.11 of the Land Development Code: Monuments and Control Points:Where such monuments occur within street pavement areas,they shall be installed in a typical water valve cover, as prescribed in the current County standards. Installation of } all monuments shall be in accordance with State Statutes and as approved by the County Engineer. 3. Division 3.2.,Section 3.2.8.4.16.8 of the Land Development Code: Curb Radii (Reduce requirements from forty(40')foot radius to thirty(30')foot radius at interior street to local road intersections. 4. Division 3.2 Section 3.2.8.3.24 of the Land Development Code: Utility Casings-approved if all underground utilities are installed prior to street construction. 3.7 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL Site Development Plan approval shall follow the procedure as outlined in Division 3.3,Site Development Plans,of the Collier County Land Development Code. In the case of clustered buildings, required property development regulations may be waived or reduced provided a site plan is approved under this section. (12-CPS-01192/1159092/1)Words underlined are added;Words struck through are deleted 3/5/15 SECTION IV PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the permitted uses and standards for development ( within Wilson Professional Center. 4.2 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure,or part thereof,shall be erected, altered,or used,or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: a) Offices and medical offices with a maximum of 72,000 sq. ft. ' , and subject to the following limitations: 1. Emergency medical clinics are prohibited. 2. Medical office uses are limited to a maximum occupancy of 17,396 sq.ft. ( 2) Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a) Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this district. b) Caretaker's residences in accordance with applicable County regulations. c) Essential services as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code. d) One (1) 150' Monopine Communication Tower and Related Facilities ( 4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1) Maximum Number of Parcels:Two building parcels. ( 2) Minimum Setback Requirements for Principal Structures: a) Internal road easement or front yard--25 feet. b) Side Yard-15 feet. c) Rear Yard—25 feet. d) PUD Property Line-50 feet in which no parking is permitted. e) Preserve— zero feet principal and accessory structures. A deviation from section 3.05.07(H)(3)of the LDC requiring a 25 feet setback for principal structures and 10 feet for accessory structures to allow a zero feet setback for principal and accessory structures is permitted in recognition of the then existing Growth Management Plan requirements for native vegetation retention at the time the original PUD was approved which did not require a preserve setback. (12-CPS-01192/1159092/1]Words underlined are added; Words stwek-thre-ugli are deleted 3/5/15 3) Maximum Height of Structures: Thirty-five (35)feet not to exceed two(2)stories. 4) Minimum Floor Area of Principal Structure: One thousand (1,000)square feet per building on ground floor. 5) Distance Between Principal Structures-Thirty(30)feet. 6) Minimum standards for signs, parking, lighting, and landscaping shall be in conformance with applicable Collier County Regulations in effect at the time permits are sought unless otherwise specified in this document.The project shall have a common uniform signage plan. Areas shown on the Master Plan as landscaped shall be landscaped. 7) Prior to development-of any building parcel, a development plan shall be approved in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code. 8) Tract Coverage Control Limitations and Architectural Control The maximum horizontal area of each tract that may be covered by the principal building, accessory buildings and future additions to either shall not exceed 25 percent of the total area of the tract. The building area does not include parking areas,driveways, loading areas,or sidewalks. All buildings within the Park shall have a common architectural theme and shall be of permanent type construction with a fire retardant roof. Exterior walls of all buildings shall be of exposed concrete aggregate,stucco,glass,terrazzo, brick, or other similar materials. Concrete,concrete block or wood siding, providing they meet applicable fire regulations, are also acceptable materials for exterior walls, but they shall be finished by painting,staining or other processing. Exterior metal clad buildings shall be prohibited. A common architectural theme shall be established for the project and all structures shall be reviewed for conformity by the project sponsors. 9) Signs t Identification signs identifying the name and business of the persons or firms occupying the premises and the name, purpose and description of the overall project shall be permitted. Advertising signs, billboards or other signs except those specifically permitted by the developer are prohibited. All signs shall conform to Collier County Regulations. [12-CPS-01192/1159092/11Words underlined are added;Words st�c-k-th-Fe-ugh are deleted 3/5/15 i i i i 10) Utilities All electrical and telephone service shall be brought underground into the site and to the buildings from the nearest available source. Pad mounted electrical transformers shall be located and screened so as to prevent viewing from any public street or adjacent property. 1 i 11) Parkin s Off-street parking spaces sufficient to accommodate the parking demands generated by the project shall be provided on the site and/or on the adjacent church property,subject to a i suitable agreement between the two parties and the Collier County Development Services t Director concerning sharing of parking facilities. j Parking areas shall be constructed to Collier County Standards. i 1 12) Maintenance 3 The owner or lessee of any tract in the Wilson Professional Center must at all times keep the • E , premises, buildings, improvements and appurtenances in a safe,clean,wholesome condition,and comply in all respects with all government, health and policy requirements. ip i All landscaping and exterior portions of structures shall be maintained in order to keep an attractive appearance. ri 13) Monopine Communication Tower and Related Facilities Development Standards The Monopine Communication Tower, and all related facilities, shall be enclosed by an 8' tall, opaque,architecturally finished wall and located on the proposed tower tract,shown on Exhibit"A".The Monopine Communication Tower shall be set back from the property r lines as follows: North 442'2";South 229'6"; East 610'3";West 42'1".All related facilities, i r other than the Monopine Communication Tower,shall be set back from the property lines as follows: North 402'9";South 190'7"; East 570'8";West 20'1". ; 14) Deviations Deviation#1 Seeks relief from the LDC Section 5.05.09.G.2.a, which requires a 375'setback for the tower from all residential property,calculated at the height of the tower multiplied - by 2.5,to allow a 229'6"setback from residential property to the South. Deviation#2 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.06.02 C.Z.,"Buffer Requirements,"which requires a Type A 10-foot wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on t center,to allow a 0-foot wide landscape buffer between the tower tract and the rest of the PUD. I [12-CPS-01192/1159092/11Words underlined are added;Words struck through are deleted 3/5/15 s 1 1 1 3 3 1 i I I Deviation#3 seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.06.05 B.2.c., "General Landscaping 1 Requirements," which requires sites without native vegetation to have a 15-foot wide 1 I landscape buffer with minimum code size trees located 25 feet on center and a 3-foot high hedge planted 3 feet on center,to allow a 4-foot wide landscape buffer. I SECTION V ) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS i 1 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the general commitments for development of the I I project. I 5.2 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 1 I l a) Intersection improvements at project entrances shall be provided by the developer. I I a b) The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic 1 signal at the intersection of Airport Road and Bailey Lane when deemed warranted by the I County Engineer. The signal shall be owned,operated and maintained by Collier County. t i 1 c) The developer shall provide street lighting at the project entrance.The operating and maintenance costs shall be assumed by Collier County. d) The primary access to the property will be via Bailey Lane and since the increase in traffic from the proposed development will increase turning movements,a northbound left turn 1 lane and a southbound right turn lane may be necessary.An existing median opening with a I I turn lane serves the above northbound left turn lane requirement. No southbound right 1 turn lane exists;accordingly a commitment to construct a southbound right turn lane is z. I required prior to the approval of building permits for the PUD.The southbound right turn lane shall be a joint project between the County and the development wherein the County shall be responsible to obtain the necessary right-of-way, by condemnation if required,and a the developer responsible for construction of the turn lane, relocation of sidewalk and utilities. Future developments along Bailey Lane shall be required to make a fair share 1 contribution toward the right-of-way and construction costs of this turn lane.These J contributions shall be used to reimburse the County for right-of-way costs and this petitioner for construction costs. [12-CPS-01192/1159092/1)Words underlined are added; Words struck through are deleted = 3/5/15 - a 1 e) The location of the entrance drive off Bailey Lane shall be placed a minimum of 200 feet west of Airport Road for sufficient westbound vehicle storage to eliminate delays and conflicts at the Airport Road/Bailey Lane intersection. f) An internal road exit onto Airport Road may be allowed subject to design approval by the Engineering Department with the condition that the County retains the right to close off the curb opening should traffic accidents and/or unsafe conditions develop on Airport Road as a result of exiting conditions. Mountable curbing shall be provided on each side of the median for a distance of 100 feet in each direction from the exit. g) The above improvements are considered "site-related" as defined in Ordinance 85-55,and shall not be applied as credits toward any impact fees required by that Ordinance. h) In accordance with Ordinance 85-55, requiring development to contribute its proportionate share of funds to accommodate the impact of proposed development on area roads;the developer of each parcel or their successors or assigns,agrees to pay road impact fees in accordance with the ordinance,at such time as building permits are requested. i) Bailey Lane shall be reconstructed as a boulevard section along the frontage of the project and tapered to meet existing pavement. j) The internal street shall be designed to avoid any conflicting turning movements into the individual parcels by configuring the proposed islands to eliminate any possible conflicts. k) A sidewalk shall be provided along at least one side of the internal road and along Bailey Lane from said road to Airport Road. 5.3 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL I' Arrangements shall be made with the approved solid waste disposal service to provide for solid waste collection service to all areas of the project. 5.4 PUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN a. The PUD Master Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"A" is an illustrative preliminary development plan. b. The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood as flexible so that that final design may satisfy the project and comply with all applicable requirements. Acreages shown on the PUD Master Plan are approximate and subject to changes to ) accommodate final engineering plan. [12-CPS-01192/1159092/11 Words underlined are added;Words s hrough are deleted 3/5/15 1 c. All necessary easements, dedications,or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. d. Minor design changes shall be permitted subject to the County Development Services Director's administrative approval. e. Landscape buffers shall be provided along the south property line and along the north property line west of the project entrance as identified here: 1. South property line; 6'woodcrete fence set in 5' natural vegetation buffer. 2. North property line;west of project entrance 10' buffer consisting of natural vegetation. f. Outside storage areas shall be screened from adjacent properties. g. Only three(3) road accesses shall be provided,two from Bailey Lane and one from Airport Road as controlled by the Engineering Department. 5.5 UTILITIES a. A central water supply system shall be made available to the project.The water supply source for the project shall be the city of Naples system. b. The project shall be served by an approved,on-site or off-site wastewater disposal facilities system. c. Any establishment requiring a CCPHU permit must submit plans for review and approval.•County En:••-- . . - e• •• •• - • - • - -• - - .. .• - •- . ) 577 5.6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS a. As portrayed in the revised preliminary site plans dated July 7, 1987,dDry retention/buffer areas surrounding the parcel will be an average of at least 36 feet in width. Final design of the dry retention/buffer areas should incorporate retention of the maximum amount of native vegetation possible,and final designs will be subject to the review and approval of the County Project Review Services Environmental staff. This condition is conceptually depicted as Preserve Areas on the PUD Master plan and shall satisfy all native vegetation retention requirements. [12-CPS-01192/1159092/1]Words underlined are added; Words struck through are deleted 3/5/15 { jS L-aad-seaping-and-internatisu eunding buffer designs could incorporate the sabal palm transp antatio , •- _. .. - -•e ... e• •• • b. Petitioner should investigate using rock or paver bricks for roadways and parking lots in lieu of traditional use of asphalt paving. w 1 I`= Lk F gy1 } [12-CPS-01192/1159092/11 Words underlined are added;Words struck through are deleted 3/5/15 4 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 CYCLE 3 AMENDMENT (ADPOPTION HEARING) Project/Petition #'s: PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 (Companion PUDZ-PL20130001726) LEIT, A OR/ COMMUNITY et NAPIES MA4C� DRI) > MICEU S 29 28 27 rri8 PI) (5) 1. I w MYRTLE !f/ i U WOODS -1I STI.ERS III ,. PROJECT TREE TOPS lrPlpPPPPP". LOCATION 2 TRAL ACRES I t J 32 33 34 NANCENTIAN (S) NENTWORTH ESTATES 4:'T^ IA FALLS , CCPC: MARCH 19, 2015 BCC: APRIL 28, 2015 Clerk of Court 4th FL - Building "F" TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC— 2013 Cycle 3 GMP Adoption Amendment Project/Petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 (Companion PUDZ-PL20130001726) CCPC March 19, 2015 AGENDA 1) TAB: Table of Contents DOCUMENT: Table of Contents 2) TAB: Adoption Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Adoption Staff Report: PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 3) TAB: Adoption Ordinance DOCUMENT: Adoption Ordinance w/Exhibit "A" text (and/or maps): PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 4) TAB: Review Responses DOCUMENT: Comments from DEO & State Agencies 5) TAB: Transmittal Executive Summary DOCUMENT: Executive Summary 6) TAB: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report 7) TAB: Transmittal Resolution DOCUMENT: 2014-231 Trans. Resolution w/Exhibit "A" text & maps 8) TAB: Legal Advertisements DOCUMENT: CCPC Advertisement 9) TAB: Petition CP-2013-10 DOCUMENT: Project PL20130001767/ Petition CP-2013-10 Co e-r Cotit-r,-tty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULATION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: MARCH 19, 2015 SUBJECT: 2013 CYCLE THREE, SINGLE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) ELEMENT: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES Transmittal hearings on the subject amendment were held on August 21 and September 4, 2014 Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), and on October 14 and 28, 2014 Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The respective Transmittal recommendations/actions are presented further below, following the petition number and title. Within CCPC materials provided you will find the Transmittal Executive Summary from the BCC hearings and certain attachments referenced therein, plus the Transmittal CCPC staff report for the petition, which provides staff's detailed analysis of the petition. REVIEW AGENCY COMMENT LETTERS After review of the Transmitted GMP amendment, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) rendered its Comment Letter indicating "no comment" within the agency's authorized scope of review, as did the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC)], Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) conducted a planning level analysis and rendered comments within their authorized scope of review. FDOT indicates that the proposed amendment is not anticipated to adversely impact important State transportation resources or facilities, and provided an additional comment regarding FDOT access standards; and, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) rendered comments within their authorized scope of review, indicating that the proposed amendment is not anticipated to adversely impact important State resources. The Florida Department of Education (DOE) rendered comments within their authorized scope of review, as follows: The Department recommends the changes associated with the proposed amendment CP- 2013-10 be reviewed as required by Section 8 of the Collier County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency before adoption consideration. In response to the DOE Comment, staff notes the Transmittal package of materials was provided to School District representatives and subsequently reviewed in accordance with - 1 - STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) Interlocal Agreement Section 8. Determinations from their Section 8 review are found in a letter dated January 22, 2015, as attached hereto and summarized below. In accordance with Interlocal Agreement subsection 8.2, Collier County notified the School District of the proposed GMP amendment that may increase school enrollment. In accordance with Interlocal Agreement subsection 14.2, the Collier County School District subsequently conducted the school planning level review per the Collier County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency and responded. The School District response indicates at this time there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development for the elementary, middle and high school levels. This ;,;:ding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a determination of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the development is located within or adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. The Comments Letters received are located within materials provided to the CCPC. The remaining reviewing agency, Department of State, Bureau of Historic Preservation, did not provide a Comment Letter. Within CCPC materials provided is an Ordinance with Exhibit "A" text and maps for the petition; those exhibits reflect the FLUE text and maps as approved by BCC for Transmittal. PROPOSED AMENDMENT PETITION CP-2013-10 / PL2013-0001767, requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan, to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The subject property, consisting of±30.68 acres, is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. This petition seeks to establish the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict to allow for entirely commercial development, for entirely residential development, or for mixed use (commercial and residential) development. Commercial development is limited to 250,000 square feet of gross floor area, one hotel of up to 150 rooms and an assisted living facility. Commercial uses allowed are the permitted and conditional uses of the C-3 zoning district plus hotel, dental labs, skilled nursing facilities, and department stores. Residential development is limited to a maximum of 224 market rate multi-family units. Mixed Use development limits commercial intensity to 128,000 square feet of gross floor area, one hotel of up to 150 rooms and an assisted living facility on no more than 10 acres, and residential density based on 7.3 units per non-commercial acre. The Subdistrict also provides for conversions if the project is developed with a hotel or assisted living facility, for automobile fuel pumps accessory to a grocer or membership warehouse-type facility larger than 15,000 square feet of gross floor area and, for a recreational site for use by residents of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks. Note: A companion PUD rezone petition is scheduled for this same hearing. TRANSMITTAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not to Transmit to DEO. CCPC RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DEO (vote: 4/2), with the density reduction [from 11.74 DU/ac. to 10.0 DU/ac.] and with further modification of the amendment to reduce the maximum number of dwelling units from 360 to 307 DU, remove maximum building heights from Subdistrict provisions, calculate residential density on non-commercial acreage only, prohibit affordable-workforce housing, reduce commercial intensity from the initially proposed C-5 - 2 - STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) commercial uses to C-3 and other additional specific uses, prohibit a stand-alone automobile fuel station and, introduce conversion factors for certain uses. BCC ACTION: Transmitted to DEO (vote: 4/1), with the density reduction [from 10.0 DU/ac. to 7.3 DU/ac. for a maximum 224 DU total] and with further modification of the amendment to reduce the number of additional specific commercial uses allowed. ADOPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward the single, 2013 Cycle 3 petition to the BCC with a recommendation not to adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and reviewing agencies that provided comments. IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend adoption, staff recommends the following revisions to portions of the Subdistrict text to remove an unnecessary intensity standard for the hotel use no longer contained in the LDC. [Words underlined are added -as Transmitted; Words double underlined are added, and words double stfttek4144444 are deleted -as recommended by staff] 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel , and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS This staff report has been approved as to form and legality by the Office of the County Attorney. (HFAC] - 3 - STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) PREPARED BY: DATE: FAD CORBY SCH IDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER COMPREHE SIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DATE: DAVID WEEKS, AICP, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DATE: 2- 2S' C MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT APO BY: / C _ y f ," o i DATE: � N1-C, CASALAIy' ID , AD NTSTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2013 Cycle 3 GMPA Adoption (petition CP-2013-10/PL2013-0001767). Staff Report for the March 19, 2015, CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This single petition 2013.3 Cycle GMPA has been scheduled for the April 28, 2015, BCC Meeting. -4 - STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) ORDINANCE NO. 15- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 7.3 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 224 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 0.6 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 0.6. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-3 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 30.68±ACRES, [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Community Planning Act, formerly the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Petitioner, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA on behalf of Global Properties, LLC, have initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; and [14-CMP-00931/1152440/1 J 86 1 PL20130000365/CP-2013-4—rev.2/11/15 Words underlined are additions;Words st ugh are deletions *** ****** *** are a break in text WHEREAS, Collier County transmitted the Growth Management Plan amendments to the Department of Economic Opportunity for preliminary review on November 10, 2014, after public hearings before the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Department of Economic Opportunity reviewed the amendments to the Future Land Use Element to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its comments in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 180 days from receipt of the Comments Report from the Department of Economic Opportunity to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information,data and analysis supporting adoption of these amendments, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report,the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendments and other documents,testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on March 19, 2015, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on ;and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series attached hereto as Exhibit"A"and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby adopted in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court - of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective [14-CMP-00931/1152440/1]86 2 PL20130000365/CP-2013-4—rev.2/I 115 Words underlined are additions;Words stpue1E-through are deletions *** ****** ***are a break in text on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status,a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the state land planning agency. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida this day of 2015. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk TIM NANCE, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko lAs Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Text and Maps [14-CMP-00931/1152440/1]86 3 PL20130000365/CP-2013-4—rev.2/11/15 Words underlined are additions;Words stfuok-thr-ough are deletions *** ****** ***are a break in text PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 EXHIBIT"A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT [Page 10] Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek. Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 26] 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commerc,al District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 46] 1 Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date 10/20/2014 Page 1 of .� PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses: The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally, the following uses are allowed: 1. Department store (5311), 2. Hotel (7011, hotel only), 3. Dental laboratories (8072), and 4. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051). b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 4. A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in conjunction with a convenience store) is prohibited; however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility greater than 15,000 square feet of GFA are allowed. 5. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. 2 Words underlined are added;words struck-throng-14 are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date 10/20/2014 Page„a,,,of„ „ PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 c. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible. and between internal buildings. 5. At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site native vegetation must be retained on-site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 141] Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 3 Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date: 10/20/2014 Page 3 of.,j I EXHEBIT A PETITION P1.201 30001 76 7;CP-2013-10 9� VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT p COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ' ' vW TV0410441r4474WW a / 0* N ‘0*-4 4 a 1 ( _I---, , , , , ' , 0. ,.. . . . 1 , , ii.. _ ,,,,,„ . \\...,,_ ,....... %I.t• 4041;4 A f _..., , ..... _____i__' ' 1 _. , ‘,,:-'( \ - . '.1 ammo ,--Fr-ril, i i 1 I '\ :4(0.4'- 4,40414 Afik 1 1 v■ >11*- #.#.4 AS.' \\NN '-' 3::-, • / Ass ...\\ ‘11 •INI .4401 41, rvef # .414:41 r2 ,e #W'1-'CIN \ 4° dopA\ '\ ,--) 40 lit i I I. I 1 1 ! I f IN ,(1 I Man, I u1 - --- '''N/ 'N cb.At- t ' ,,C J LEGEND SCALE \\ SUBDISTRICT gY � 1 1 a PREPARED BY G>S/CAO YA�MIO 0 1000 FT. 2000 FT. cR E:AR:2 OIY-20/SE1 CUMO AND REOIIUTON DAZE: 7/201♦ FLE• CP-2013-10A.DIYC I Page 4 of S p 1 T48S , T47S T48S T49S 1 T608 I T 51 5 I T 52 5 1 T5S8 1 t; R d 1 4 14 ,1 ? a s S a °a 'e 1410 a e d@@ b °a c CD �j y 3 1 i 8 3 I-3 d v N" a ;i f a41 i 3 E t gE "S al,g 1 tl _ - �- — t '. CI 0.008 0 : I 'mill I+ W o :j"' I K " re Q. C : 6 k $ s & 4 — d W $i i!6P 3 i!Oh 7� gg2 R Ye YEYE gg ap_ 15 ; W " E s 14$o i it I P, L2 . !lilt i 1 S Ni i! +� " !!! '''' s'@ Y Ysa t_ y Y 'N.H gg IV 0,g €g g ANN .g ii M F all h g ■•s#�-n3■o■ a Elm !MOM arag20 _ ! 4 :""c S8 a d i a aay5 2 _ hi d p#tel ° ! Oil y 3+ 1 i L Q, im 'fl I` '' : 1 : 45L Eli" p lAiYI Y E YEE.�a49 aye k p `�i8g f�C' � F i' r a Oil II �S i 9§y�e!tl! a ili=a pp i i31 S 11 W 7tlint r, r, ii0Q®®eark■••aIII••■©:a■ :._a__ m C g W ee l CP`m O , .4'. h,,,-1 X x .„ # / } W i 9 w i � a ; W �K O C (11 — a/ � , _ w IP. �1 is 1 'iu cs 5 '• .., 0 / IIII6 r / Y� r _Am ,, e..!i . ._, , .. •4-.0 ,- W } i— IA F, W n. .,f C C 2 g 1 t . 11%A • y ea x I z U S.a ;`a ' � .---ter% F1 a� l. x — uu a Sri..tom / �!'- ", ° p — /,. / �.• NONli! IV CA ti.diWtt W i— JI�s, +. wW ` �i- W N 7 ....s _' .-2J m N 1. ;t O; ; /' j S at 1 j S It 1 S St i S 8f l S 09 1 I S 19 1 J S Z9 1 I S SS 1 Page_NE_of E �� • Rick Scott viatiw ' Jesse Panuccio GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY December 10, 2014 The Honorable Tom Henning, Chairman Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112-5746 Dear Chairman Henning: The Department of Economic Opportunity has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for Collier County (Amendment No. 14-5ESR), which was received on November 12, 2014. We have reviewed the proposed amendment pursuant to Sections 163.3184(2) and (3), Florida Statutes (F.S.), and identified no comments related to important state resources and facilities within the Department's authorized scope of review that will be adversely impacted by the amendment if adopted. The County is reminded that pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(b), F.S., other reviewing agencies have the authority to provide comments directly to the County. If other reviewing agencies provide comments, we recommend the County consider appropriate changes to the amendment based on those comments. If unresolved, such reviewing agency comments could form the basis for a challenge to the amendment after adoption. The County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. Also, please note that Section 163.3184(3)(c)1, F.S., provides that if the second public hearing is not held within 180 days of your receipt of agency comments, the amendment shall be deemed withdrawn unless extended by agreement with notice to the Department and any affected party that provided comment on the amendment. For your assistance, we have enclosed the procedures for adoption and transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment. Florida Department of Economic Opportunity- Caldwell Building 107 E.Madison Street ; Tallahassee,FL 32399 866.FLA.2345 I 850.245.7105 1 850.921.3223 Fax w13w.tloridaiobs.orc 1 www.twittcr.com/FI,D130 ' www.facebook.com/FLDI:O The Honorable Tom Henning, Chairman December 10, 2014 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact Scott Rogers, Planning Analyst, at (850) 717-8510, or by email at scott.rogers@deo.myfiorida.com. Sincerely, Ana Richmond, Chief Bureau of Community Planning AR/sr Enclosure: Procedures for Adoption cc: Michael Bosi, Director, Collier County Planning & Zoning Department Margaret Wuerstle, Executive Director, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council SUBMITTAL OF ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR EXPEDITED STATE REVIEW Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED: Please submit three complete copies of all comprehensive plan materials, of which one complete paper copy and two complete electronic copies on CD ROM in Portable Document Format (PDF)to the Department of Economic Opportunity and one copy to each entity below that provided timely comments to the local government:the appropriate Regional Planning Council; Water Management District; Department of Transportation; Department of Environmental Protection; Department of State; the appropriate county (municipal amendments only); the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (county plan amendments only); and the Department of Education (amendments relating to public schools); and for certain local governments, the appropriate military installation and any other local government or governmental agency that has filed a written request. SUBMITTAL LETTER: Please include the following information in the cover letter transmitting the adopted amendment: Department of Economic Opportunity identification number for adopted amendment package; Summary description of the adoption package, including any amendments proposed but not adopted; Identify if concurrency has been rescinded and indicate for which public facilities. (Transportation, schools, recreation and open space). Ordinance number and adoption date; Certification that the adopted amendment(s) has been submitted to all parties that provided timely comments to the local government; Name, title, address, telephone, FAX number and e-mail address of local government contact; Letter signed by the chief elected official or the person designated by the local government. 1 Effective:June 2, 2011(Updated March 11, 2013) ADOPTION AMENDMENT PACKAGE: Please include the following information in the amendment package: In the case of text amendments, changes should be shown in strike- through/underline format. In the case of future land use map amendments, an adopted future land use map, in color format, clearly depicting the parcel, its future land use designation, and its adopted designation. A copy of any data and analyses the local government deems appropriate. Note: If the local government is relying on previously submitted data and analysis, no additional data and analysis is required; Copy of the executed ordinance adopting the comprehensive plan amendment(s); Suggested effective date language for the adoption ordinance for expedited review: The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the Department of Economic Opportunity notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the Department of Economic Opportunity or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Department of Economic Opportunity. List of additional changes made in the adopted amendment that the Department of Economic Opportunity did not previously review; List of findings of the local governing body, if any, that were not included in the ordinance and which provided the basis of the adoption or determination not to adopt the proposed amendment; Statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes not previously reviewed by the Department of Economic Opportunity in response to the comment letter from the Department of Economic Opportunity. 2 Effective:June 2, 2011(Updated March 11, 2013) I T 1926 Victoria Avenue I Fort Myers, FL ; i , P:239.338.2550 j F:239.338.2560 j 32901 � � .ice www.swfrnc.ora s ,. J �f5 R«p- "\- December 18,2014 Mr. D.Ray Eubanks Administrator Plan Review and Processing Department of Economic Opportunity 107 East Madison Street—MSC 160 Tallahassee,Florida 32399-4120 Re: Collier County/DEO 14-5ESR Dear Mr. Eubanks: The staff of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council has reviewed the requested amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The review was performed according to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. The Council will review the proposed amendments to the Collier County GMP at its January 15, 2 015 meeting. Council staff has recommended that Council find the changes described in CP- 2013-10/PL20130001767 as not regionally significant, and consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan (SRPP). Council staff has recommended that the Council find that the requested changes do not produce adverse effects to significant regional resources and support the recommendation of the Collier County Emergency Management requiring that the developer provide a one-time developer contribution of a generator to mitigate impact for hurricane evacuation concerns. The generator as specified by the Collier County Emergency Management allows for additional evacuee capacities at various shelter(s)that can be used based on the storm factors associated with development in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). Council staff also recommended that.Council find that the requested changes do not produce adverse effects to facilities found in the SRPP and that the proposed changes do not produce extra-jurisdictional impacts that are inconsistent with the comprehensive plans of any other local government A copy of the official staff report explaining the Council staff's recommendation is attached. If Council action differs from the staff recommendation,we will notify you. Sincerely, (.....th 'outhwest Florida Regio al Planning Council Margaret uerstle,AICP Executi - l irector MW/MAD Attachment Cc: Nick Casalanguida,Administrator,Growth Management Division,Collier County OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER THE CAPITOL (850)617-7700 400,. 400 SOUTH MONROE STREET TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 32399-0800 ‘N. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES COMMISSIONER ADAM H. PUTNAM December 10,2014 VIA EMAIL(davidweeks @colliergov.net) Collier County Growth Management Division Attn: David Weeks 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: DACS Docket#--20141117-484 Collier County CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 Submission dated November 10,2014 Dear Mr.Weeks: The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services(the"Department") received the above- referenced proposed comprehensive plan amendment on November 17, 2014 and has reviewed it pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes to address any potential adverse impacts to important state resources or facilities related to agricultural, aquacultural,or forestry resources in Florida if the proposed amendment(s)are adopted. Based on our review of your county's submission, the Department has no comment on the proposal. If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 850-410-2289. Sincerely, � 11 / r' 1 fp' • Stormie Knight Sr. Management Analyst I Office of Policy and Budget cc: Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (SLPA#: Collier County 14-5 ESR) • Fresh I-800-HELPFLA Florida www.FreshFromFlorida.com p� -S Z SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT JOS. „u,„oy7N December 4, 2014 Nick Casalanguida, Administrator Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Collier County, DEO #14-5ESR Comments on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package Dear Mr. Casalanguida: The South Florida Water Management District (District) has completed its review of the proposed amendment package from Collier County (County). The amendment creates the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict by adding policies and changing the land use designation on a 30.7 acre parcel. There appear to be no regionally significant water resource issues; therefore, the District forwards no comments on the proposed amendment package. The District offers its technical assistance to the County and the Department of Economic Opportunity in developing sound, sustainable solutions to meet the County's future water supply needs and to protect the region's water resources. Please forward a copy of adopted amendments to the District. For assistance or additional information, please contact Deborah Oblaczynski, Policy and Planning Analyst, at (561) 682-2544 or doblaczy(c�sfwmd.gov. Sincerely, Of2-- Pb-N. Dean Powell Water Supply Bureau Chief DP/do c: Ray Eubanks, DEO Deborah Oblaczynski, SFWMD David Weeks, AICP, Collier County Brenda Winningham, DEO Margaret Wuerstle, SWFRPC 3301 Gun Club Road,West Palm Beach,Florida 33406 • (561)686-8800 • FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 Mailing Address: P.O.Box 24680,West Palm Beach,FL 33416-4680 • wwwsfwmd.gov f" FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION State Board of Education icy fldoe.org Pam Stewart Commissioner of Education Gary Chartrand,Chair John R.Padget,Vice Chair Members Ada G.Armas,M.D. John A.Colon Marva Johnson Rebecca Fishman Lipsey Andy Tuck December 4, 2014 Mr. David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Plan Manager Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Via E-mail: davidweeks @colliergov.net Re: Collier County 14-5 ESR Dear Mr. Weeks: On November 14, 2014, the Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO)notified me of its receipt of the Collier County proposed 14-5ESR comprehensive plan amendment. Because the county did not provide a copy to the Florida Department of Education, I accessed the proposed amendment package through the DEO's online plan amendment archive, Florida PAPERs. According to the department's responsibilities under section 163.3184(3)(b),Florida Statutes, I reviewed the amendment package considering the provisions of chapter 163, part II, F.S., and to determine whether the proposal, if adopted, would have the potential to create adverse effects on public school facilities. The amendment relates to petition PL2013001767/CP-2013-10, which proposes an amendment of the future land use element text and map to establish the Vincentian Mixed-Use District. Although the application and staff report assert that there are no effects on public school facilities, the proposal's intent to permit up to an additional 307 residential dwellings appears to have the potential to increase demands for public school capacity, and thus must be analyzed for such effects. Given this, I contacted Amy Lockhart, AICP, with the Collier County Public Schools,to request an analysis.Because she had not received the proposed amendment, she was not able to provide one.Prior to considering adoption of the amendment,the county and the applicant should complete the school planning level review required by section 8 of the Collier County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency. If the planning level review indicates that a planning solution is necessary to address any estimated deficit,the county should revise the amendment to adopt an appropriate solution. Thomas H.Inserra Director,Office of Educational Facilities www.fldoe.org 325 W.Gaines Street,Suite 1014 I Tallahassee,FL 32399-0400 1 850-245-0494 ©2014,Florida Department of Education.All Rights Reserved. Mr. David Weeks,AICP December 4, 2014 Page Two Section 163.3184(1), F.S., defines the department as a reviewing agency to receive comprehensive plan amendments that relate to public schools. It has been my understanding that amendments that relate to public schools include those that propose an increase in residential density(whether by text or map amendment), propose a change in land use proximate to an existing or future public school site or to accommodate a future school, or propose policy revisions that would affect intergovernmental coordination with the school district regarding public educational facilities.Please direct such future amendments to my attention at the letterhead address. If you prefer to save the costs of copying and mailing amendments, I would welcome transmittal via e-mail to the address listed below. If you have questions about this letter, or if I may be of assistance, please contact me at 850-245- 9312 or tracy.suber@fldoe.org. Sin erely, dr7 / / i Tracy Ir. Suber Growth Management and Facilities Policy Liaison TDS/ cc: Ms. Amy Lockhart,AICP, Collier County Public Schools Ms. Brenda Winningham, DEO/State Land Planning Agency Mr. Scott Rogers,DEO/State Land Planning Agency $ o -D ƒ 2 / / k § / • y Ca CU 0- / $ / / § O) 0 ° § k I• c 2 a) 0 . D _ a, 4-',.,, as c co CU § # 2 3 – 2 # 7 2 # 7 § 3 ° = 2 f R v i o � f # a $ f / \ . _ 2 CO = 0- • / \ � k / A � k � � +4 CO t c 3 c g c 2\W / /a / / \ c -' % 0 2 = 5 c – c ° u ® g 2 A / 0 - _ E _ • e G c) a) c ) 4 a)0 CL E \ >. U k C 0 ® -0 Q L- � k � / / ea 2 2 % E a ® c § ' � � " f / \ o \ a \ B CD .4 G 0 U) a) a .� ± k \ $ k > _ : G .m 2 e a) C U ~ e $ =vs b E o w . § \ 3 2 # / % E a C E § c % CD 2 3 ° 3 U - « E \ g g E E \ 2 C i % ± \ � f / \ / S te 0 � � § 3 ° c -0 $ ° c 0 � Q � � � g . cm ( 2 \ k 3 f ± / f m ' 13 ® C q //• e * E I § $ / § § E £ 2 CO \ ¥ $ 2E 0 _ � / E � _ '> _ o- • m ° # ° o / S 9 ® o m m « u o 2 / • k o f cc 52m = L / 2 � � d § 33 ) / � k ° � § 2 / » o c E cu � ' ; a, E / \ ? ° 2 ° § 2 E f C § RS § 3 > o • E / a \ m a) _ & co % = c E / % c o o E RI G a § 2 / >- A / \ Q / \ / o y s m 5 = 0 4 ° 3 > 0 ° ° q L. / U Q 7 Eƒ k \ - 0 § s- $ § 5 2 2 2 $ OS § 70- k k d a) 2 4-' j / ƒ a_ E e q LA RS t (4 k 8 't 7 § f / % § § c § U 3 / 0 a \ 0 - m 2 7 ^ o � . . � E oc . . � mo � � $ � – ° = / 20 U. co u- -- u. 2I- V2 / ƒ / § k / as / / k ƒ $ � � � T U O co t U l6 C O U co N N C C N N O Ca E C O U N N 0 C N O C O V N N Q N Cl) O U N d f0 O N N C O 0. N N C_ N N f6 N co N N co co .m as E N R. 7 O A C 0 C O 0 T N a `o U N U L. 0. o a2 LIP ifi ire -o N V(A ilf CD C j m C 3 f6 � O Cog CU -0 C O z t - j� O O' C� FDD Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 10041 Daniels Parkway ANANTH PRASAD,P.E. GOVERNOR Fort Myers,FL 33913 SECRETARY November 25,2014 Mr. David Weeks, AICP Growth Management Plan Manager Collier County Growth Management Division/Planning&Regulation Planning&Zoning Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples,Florida 34104 RE: Collier County 14-5ESR Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment(Expedited State Review Process)—FDOT Comments and Recommendations Dear Mr. Weeks: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District One, has reviewed the Collier County 14-5ESR, Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, transmitted under the Expedited State Review process (transmitted by the Board of County Commissioners on October 28, 2014) in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statutes (F.S.) Chapter 163. The Department offers Collier County the following comments and recommendations for your consideration regarding the proposed amendment. CP-2013-10 (Text and Map Amendment): The subject site comprises 30.7 acres, lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), and is generally located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 4I (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park in Collier County, Florida. The comprehensive plan amendment proposes to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to introduce a new Subdistrict and to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District (UMUD), Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (UCFS) to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict(VMUS). The subject property(Vincentian project) was initially approved as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) per Collier County Ordinance 99-37. The approved Vincentian PUD includes 57,500 square feet of commercial uses, 57,500 square feet of general office and 40 single family residential dwelling units, which would result in 447 p.m. peak hour trips (after the reduction of the internal capture and pass-by trips). www.dot.state.fl.us Mr. David Weeks Collier County 14-5ESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25,2014 Page 2 of 5 Based on the information provided in the traffic study and the staff report, the proposed Vincentian PUD Amendment will continue to develop as a mixed-use commercial project. The proposed land-use includes 190,000 square feet of commercial uses, a hotel (100 rooms) and 57,500 square feet of general office, which would result in 851 p.m. peak hour trips (after the reduction of the internal capture and pass-by trips). As indicated in the following tables, the proposed development could result in a net increase of 404 p.m.peak hour trips. TRIP GENERATION AS PROPOSED 1TE Size of Development Land Use Land PM Scenario Designation Use Acres Allowed Peak Development Trips SF 210 40 DU's 46 Residential General 710 30.7 57,500 sf 143 Office Shopping 820 57,500 sf 413 Center Existing Internal Capture Trips 58 Pass-By Trips'- 97 Total(Existing Condition) 447 Hotel 310 100 Occ. 70 Rooms General 710 30.7 57,500 sf 143 Office Shopping 820 190,000 sf 921 Center Proposed Internal Capture Trips 60 Pass-By Tiips2 223 Total(Proposed Condition) 851 Change in Trips +404 1. Trip generation based on the rates and equations obtained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition). 2. A pass by rate was limited to a maximum of 25% of the trips generated by the shopping center,per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures. As seen in the following tables, a planning level analysis was prepared to establish whether state roadways in the vicinity of the project will operate at their adopted level of service (LOS) www.dot.state.fl.us Mr.David Weeks Collier County 14-5ESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25,2014 Page 3 of 5 standards, as identified within the Collier County's comprehensive plan during the existing (2013), short-term(2019), and long term (2035)horizon year conditions. YEAR 2013 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2013 Conditions From To SIS? County LOS Roadway Std. No.of Lanes Service' PM Peak LOS tcceptablc? Volume Hour\'ol. CR 864; US 41 Rattlesnake Tr Drops N E 6 5,660 3.105 C Yes Hammock Rd. CR US 41 Tree Tops Dr. 951:'Collier N E 6 5,660 2,520 C Yes Blvd. North of SR 951 Championship US 41 N D 4 3,759 2,565 C Yes Dr. 1. PM Peak Hour Two-Way Service Volume at the County Adopted LOS Standard. YEAR 2019 SHORT-TERM HORIZON ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2019 Conditions Roadway From To No.of Service' 20192 Project3 Project Total Lanes Volume Background Dist.% Traffic Traffic LOS Acceptable? Traffic CR 864/ US 41 Rattlesnake Tree Tops 6 5,660 3,474 60% 242 3,716 C Yes Hammock Rd Dr. CR US 41 Tree Tops Dr. 951/Collier 6 5,660 2,826 35% 141 2,967 C Yes Blvd North of SR 951 Championship US 41 4 3,759 2,871 10% 40 2,911 C Yes Dr. 1. PM Peak Hour Two-Way Service Volume at the County Adopted LOS Standard. 2. The short-term planning horizon year 2019 background volumes were obtained using trends analysis based growth rates. 3. The project traffic distribution percentages were obtained based on the information provided in the traffic study. www.dot.state.fl.us Mr.David Weeks Collier County 14-5ESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25,2014 Page 4 of 5 YEAR 2035 LONG-TERM HORIZON ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2035 Conditions Roadway From To No.of Service' 20352 Project3 Project Total Lanes \"olume Background Dist.% Traffic Traffic LOS Acceptable? Traffic CR 864/ US 41 Rattlesnake Tree Tops 6 5 60%Dr. 5,660 4,473 60% 242 4,715 C Yes Hammock Rd CR US 41 Tree Tops Dr. 951/Collier 6 5,660 3,627 35% 141 3,768 C Yes Blvd North of SR 951 Championship US 41 4 3,759 3,690 10% 40 3,730 D Yes Dr. 1. PM Peak Hour Two-Way Service Volume at the County Adopted LOS Standard. 2. The long-term planning horizon year 2035 background volumes were obtained using trends analysis based growth rates. 3. The project traffic distribution percentages were obtained based on the information provided in the traffic study. FDOT Comment# 1: The Department has determined that the changes associated with the proposed amendment CP-2013-10 are not anticipated to adversely impact important state transportation resources or facilities. FDOT Comment#2: The subject property is located along the west side of US 41. Any access to US 41 will be subject to FDOT permitting process as described in Rule 14-96 FAC. The FDOT may require that the applicant provide mitigation for any such impacts as a condition of a permit. The FDOT Access Management standard for US 41 is access class 3 front CR 864/Rattlesnake Hammock Road(M.P. 15.834) to Joseph Lane (M.P. 23.188). The FDOT standards for access class 3 require a minimum spacing of 2,640 feet (one half of a mile) for signals and full median openings, 1,320 feet(one quarter of a mile)for directional median openings, and 660 feet (one eighth of a mile) between access points for any single parcel, at posted speed limits greater than 45 MPH. www.dot.state.fl.us Mr.David Weeks Collier County I4-5ESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25,2014 Page 5 of 5 Thank you for providing FDOT with the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed amendment. If you have any questions please free to contact me at(239)225-1981 or sarah.catala@dot.state.fl.us. Sincerely, Sarah Catala SIS/Growth Management Coordinator FDOT District One CC: Mr. Ray Eubanks, Florida Department of Economic Opportunity www.dot.state.fl.us KendallMarcia From: WeeksDavid gent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:11 PM To: SchmidtCorby Cc: BosiMichael; KendallMarcia Subject: FW: Collier County 14-5ESR (CP-2013-10) [Vincentian] FYI. (already saved into proper folder) From: Hight, Jason [mailto:Jason.Hight @MVFWC.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:45 PM To: DCPexternalagencycomments; WeeksDavid Cc: Wallace, Traci; Chabre, Jane; Poole, Mary Ann Subject: Collier County 14-5ESR(CP-2013-10) Mr. Weeks: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission(FWC) staff has reviewed proposed comprehensive plan amendment in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. We have no comments, recommendations, or objections related to fish and wildlife or listed species and their habitat to offer on this amendment. If you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Jane Chabre either by phone at(850) 410- 5367 or at FWCConservationPlanningServices(&,MyFWC.com. If you have specific technical questions, please contact Mary Ann Poole at(850) 488-8783 or by email at maryann.poole@MyFWC.com. Sincerely, Jason Hight Biological Administrator II Office of Conservation Planning Services Division of Habitat and Species Conservation 620 S. Meridian Street, MS 5B5 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 (850) 228-2055 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to deny the single petition within the 2013 Cycle 3 Growth Management Plan Amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review and Comments response for the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Transmittal Hearing. OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to review the 2013 Cycle 3 amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan(GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. CONSIDERATIONS: • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their Transmittal hearing for the 2013 Cycle 3 petition on August 21 and September 4,2014. • This Transmittal hearing for the 2013 Cycle 3 considers an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map. Note: Because the support material (petition only) is voluminous, and some exhibits are oversized, some of the backup documents are not included in the printed agenda package.A link has been provided to the `I'drive on page 4 of this document in order to view the document. The entire Executive Summary package, including all support materials, is available for review in the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning & Zoning Department office, located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, including the Comprehensive Planning Section GMP Amendments web page, via http://www.colliergov.netlindex.aspx?page=2460. The entire Executive Summary package is also available in the Clerk of Courts/Minutes and Records office at 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 4th floor, Suite 401. Petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 is a petition submitted by Christopher Shucart, requesting Future Land Use Element (FLUE) amendment to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The Vincentian Subdistrict site comprises 30.7 acres and is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32,Township 50 South,Range 26 East. Among the factors analyzed are Background and Considerations, Commercial Analysis, Apartment Analysis, Residential Density and Land Use Intensities, Appropriateness of the Site, Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies within the Growth Management Plan, Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Study Analysis, and Public Facilities Impact. The following findings and conclusions result from the reviews and analyses of this request: • The subject site was approved in 1999 for mixed use development only—not stand-alone commercial or residential development. • More than 12,000 approved,but un-built dwelling units are proximate to this site. • The proposed Subdistrict proposed limiting residential development to market rate rental apartments only, prior to the CCPC meeting, which correlated with the submitted apartment study. Now, the petition proposes market rate residential development of any ownership type, which means the type of residential development could be the same as the already approved+12,000 units proximate to this site. • The proposed Subdistrict would allow residential density of 10 [12 prior to CCPC meeting] dwelling units per acre in a Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) location where additional dwelling units (beyond 4 DU/A) can only be attained when qualifying for a density bonus, but no qualifiers for density bonuses are met. • Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Objective 3 and related Policies limit public expenditures in the CHHA for certain public facilities needed to support new development permitted by the Future Land Use Element. Approval of the proposed density does not limit, but potentially expands, public expenditures in the CHHA. Florida Statutes provide the basis for this CCME Objective and Policies, with specific provisions found in: Section 163.3178(1), providing that local governments limit public expenditures in areas subject to destruction by natural disasters, and Section 163.3177(6)6, requiring local governments to limit public expenditures that subsidize development in coastal high hazard areas. • Based on data and analysis submitted for the supply of existing and potential commercial development and demand within the market area for the subject site, the additional need for the proposed commercial uses contemplated by this amendment to serve the surrounding residential areas cannot be ascertained/has not been demonstrated. Staff found the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment does not support the proposed changes to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The proposed Vincentian Subdistrict is not consistent with Coastal High Hazard Area policies or Future Land Use Element provisions within the Growth Management Plan. Additional staff analysis of this petition is included in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts to Collier County as a result of this amendment, as this is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. Petition fees account for staff review time and materials, and for the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice. Fiscal impacts to the County may result from this amendment if it is adopted. The Vincentian Subdistrict proposes residential density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre in a location where only three or four dwelling units per acre of market rate housing are allowed [within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict(UCF)and the Coastal High Hazard Area(CHHA)]. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality.A majority vote of the Board is needed for adoption of the Resolution. [HFACJ GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the Department's thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return the amendment to the CCPC and the Board for Adoption hearings to be held early in 2015. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: The site of petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 contains approximately 12.66 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Wetlands on-site are isolated with no hydrological connection to wetlands or waters ofd site. As part of the process of obtaining subsequent development orders (e.g. site development plan), the site will be subject to all applicable local, state and federal environmental protection regulations, including applicable portions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and the Land Development Code. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: No significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the Vincentian Subdistrict subject area, and it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. The site is subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 11.1.3. If found to be present or affected, as part of the process of obtaining subsequent development orders(e.g. site development plans), the site will be subject to all applicable local, State and Federal protection regulations relevant to historical and archeological sites. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the CCPC forward Petition CP-2013-10 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to deny transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC was provided with the recommendation to deny transmittal of the GMP Future Land Use Element (FLUE) amendment as proposed by the petitioner. Staff also provided the CCPC with revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc.) if they chose to recommend transmittal. The CCPC heard CP-2013-10 during two separate hearing dates. During its initial hearing, the applicant's agent presented a revised version of Subdistrict text. That version incorporated land uses, intensity, density and other key Subdistrict provisions summarized as: allowing an entirely residential development, an entirely commercial development, or mixed use (residential and commercial) development; increasing residential density to a maximum of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre (= 360 units); basing residential density upon total site acreage; removing the residential limitation to only allow rental apartments; increasing commercial intensity to a maximum of 250,000 sq. ft. of uses as allowed to the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts; allowing for an automobile service station and other commercial uses outside the C-3 District; and retaining a minimum of 15%native vegetation on site. During its continued hearing, a different version of Subdistrict text was presented by the applicant's agent. This substantially revised version incorporated changes to: (a) limit the increased residential density to a maximum of 10 dwelling units per acre(=307 units); (b)base residential density only upon non-commercial acreage; (c)relax the residential limitation to allow any market-rate dwellings, not just rental apartments; (d)limit the increased commercial intensity to a maximum of 250,000 sq. ft. of uses as allowed to the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts, with hotel and ALF conversions reducing this maximum; and, (e) allowing for automotive fuel pumps accessory to another, larger commercial facility, and other commercial Uses outside the C-3 District. There were a number of public speakers, expressing concerns about impact upon owners of businesses and residences in the area. In particular, speakers addressed the low residential density of existing neighboring developments, and contrasted it with the high residential density proposed in the Vincentian Subdistrict. Incompatibilities were identified and ways to minimize them were discussed. Interconnection was another issue discussed, as access to the commercial development to the southeast would be beneficial, without having to use US 41 for every trip. Emphasis was put on the growing traffic on both US 41 and Southwest Boulevard, and the accompanying traffic problems. Speakers located in the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park addressed the possible collaboration on land uses adjacent to, on and through their recreation/storage area. Speakers were apprehensive of such a wide-open proposal, where no specific plans for development of the site were known or proposed. The CCPC forwarded petition CP-2013-10, with the petitioner's changes,to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (vote: 4/2), subject to a few clean-up changes to the text. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Deny transmittal of petition CP-2013-10, as revised at the CCPC meeting, to the Department of Economic Opportunity. Prepared by: Corby Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks,AICP, GMP Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning and Zoning Department, Growth Management Division Attachments: 1) CP-2013-10 CCPC Staff Report; 2) CP-2013-10 Resolution with Exhibit"A"text and map 3) Application Backup Information(petition only); due to the size of the entire document it is accessible at: http://www.colliergov.net/ftp/AgendaOct1414/GrowthMgmt/op- PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 Petition Applica.pdf \\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2013 Cycles& Small Scale Petitions\2013 Cycle 3-October\2013.3 BCC Transmittal\13-10 Trnsmttl BCC exec summ_DRAFT.docx Global-Vincentlan Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULATION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: August 21, 2014 PE - - - 013-0001767• Growth Management Plan Amendment (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) APPLICANTS/OWNERS/AGENTS: Global Properties of Naples, LLC Christopher Shucart, Manager 2414 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 615 Naples, Florida 34103 Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Hole Montes, Inc. Coleman, Yovanovich &Koester. P.A. 950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34110 Naples, Florida 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The ±31 acre subject site is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. REQUESTED ACTION: Amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan, to introduce a new Subdistrict. This petition seeks to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. (CP-2013-10 Resolution Exhibit A reflects the petitioner's proposed text changes) SURROUNDING LAND USE,ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Subject Site The subject site comprises ±31 acres, and is designated Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map and lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area. The site is zoned Vincentian PUD and is undeveloped. The PUD provides for a maximum gross density of 4 dwelling units per acre (on the Residential tract); assisted living facilities; and up to 115,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses, including all permitted C-2, Convenience Commercial district uses, community theater amusement and recreation services, a miniature golf course, bike and moped rental amusement and recreation services, auto & home supply stores, business services, drinking places, hospitals, membership organizations, museums&art galleries, paint , glass&wallpaper stores, public - 1- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A administration, non-depository credit institutions, real estate services, retail nurseries, lawn &garden supply stores, social services, used merchandise stores, the USPS, and comparable C-2 commercial uses (on the Commercial Infill tract). A detailed list of uses allowed in the PUD is provided further . below. Pedestrian sidewalks are on south side of US 41,along the entire frontage of subject site, and on east side of Southwest Boulevard, also along the entire frontage of subject site. Surrounding Lands North of Subject Site: Across US 41, land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map,and zoned Whistlers Cove PUD. Whistlers Cove is developed with multi-family residential apartment buildings. The Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project facility is situated (north) east (within Eagle Lakes Park), across US 41. A pedestrian sidewalk is on north side of US 41,along entire frontage opposite the subject site. West of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. An area zoned C-5, Heavy Commercial District fronts US 41 and is developed with an automobile service station immediately across Southwest Boulevard; then with a self storage facility further(north)west. The area behind the commercial development, and across Southwest Boulevard, is zoned RSF-4 and developed as Trail Acres, a single family residential subdivision. A pedestrian sidewalk is on west side of Southwest Boulevard, along entire frontage opposite the subject site. South of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. This area is zoned RSF-4 and developed as Trail Acres, a single family residential subdivision. East of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, and zoned C-3 and MH. An area zoned C-3, Commercial Intermediate District fronts US 41 and is developed with a Collier County government service facility; then with a multi-tenant strip mall further (south) east, with its parking lot fronting US 41. The area behind these government service and commercial uses is the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park,with a mobile home park service building and vehicle area located directly behind the government service facility. In summary, along with the commercial development on the south side of US 41, the existing land uses in the area immediately surrounding or directly opposite the subject site are predominately residential in nature. STAFF ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations The Vincentian PUD was originally approved in 1985 (Ord. 85-27)and allowed "80 residential units for the elderly" on 10 acres for density of eight (8)dwelling units per acre; "a school, church, rectory and related uses"on 10 acres; and, "institutional care facilities such as, but not limited to children's home, residence for unwed mothers, family enrichment center, special educational center, etc." on 10.7 acres (31.7 acres total). The PUD was rezoned to a new Vincentian PUD in 1991 (Ord. 91-88), via the County's implementation of the zoning reevaluation program, to lower the residential allowance to 30 dwelling units (3 DU/A on 10 acres) (31.7 acres total). In 1999, the PUD was again rezoned to a new Vincentian PUD(Ord. 99-37)to allow 115,000 sq.ft. of commercial uses on 8.5 acres, residential development at four(4)dwelling units per acre on 9.8 acres, and group housing/nursing home/ALF at 0.45 FAR (30 acres total). In this latter rezone, the allowance of commercial uses along US 41 was deemed consistent with the FLUE via the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict. The commercial uses allowed are: all permitted uses in C-2, Convenience Commercial zoning district; amusement and recreation services - community theater, miniature golf course, bike and moped rental amusement and recreation services; auto & home supply stores; business services, with exceptions; drinking -2- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A places, with exclusions; hospitals; membership organizations; miscellaneous retail; museums & art galleries; paint, glass&wallpaper stores; public administration; non-depository credit institutions; real estate; retail nurseries, lawn & garden supply stores; social services; used merchandise stores, with exceptions; U.S. Postal Service, except major distribution center; and, any other commercial use comparable with the foregoing and consistent with the C-2 district. For all three rezones, the property was owned by the [Catholic] Diocese of Venice; was designated Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map(as it is designated today); and,was in the Coastal Management Area then Coastal High Hazard Area-as it is today. It is important to note that application materials suggest the uses generally described in the present Vincentian PUD are the basis from which new/additional uses are proposed, and are not confined to the permitted uses itemized above. This approach is reported further in the Comments Specific to the Commercial Needs Analysis section, below. Justifications(Refer to Attachment"B", Justification and Supplemental Information) The justifications asserted in the application's supplemental information for the proposed amendment are: (1) The shape and size of the subject site allows for a variety of commercial use options; (2) The area would benefit from additional commercial development; (3) The commercial needs study identifies a need for additional commercial uses and a deficiency in lands designated for commercial development; (4) Low density residential development is not feasible in the current market; (5) The site is well situated due to its access and exposure to an arterial roadway; (6) There is a strong demand for market rate apartments; (7) The minimum density necessary to attract a developer and quality design is considered to be around 12 dwelling units per acre; (8) The amount of commercial acreage and square footage is reduced in a mixed-use development scenario; An assessment finds only some of these justifications are supported by the petition's data and analysis. Detailed analyses are provided further below. Commercial Analysis (Refer to Attachment"E", Commercial Needs Analysis) Generally, commercial development within a community can be categorized as strip commercial development, neighborhood commercial, community commercial, regional commercial, and so forth. Based on specific studies and/or demographic data for an area, such as population, income, household size, percentage of income spent on retail goods, etc., an analyst is able to estimate supportable commercial square feet for various lines of goods and services for that geography by shopping center type. Relevant to the subject petition, a community commercial needs analysis was provided in support of the requested commercial development. The firm of Fishkind and Associates, Inc., conducted a Commercial Needs Analysis dated January 31, 2014 with an amended date of July 31, 2014, identifying the market conditions within a 5-minute, 10- minute and 15-minute drive time from the subject site. This analysis provided an assessment of the community commercial needs for the existing and projected population within the site's market area. Analysis identifies that there is a demand for community serving commercial within the 10-minute and 15-minute drive-time market areas. The commercial square feet demand findings from the study are as follows: -3- CP-2013-10/P L20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A The community commercial square feet demand that can be supported by the area's population projected in 2019 is 920,597 sq. ft. within the 10-minute drive time and 1,438,596 sq. ft. within the 15-minute drive time. To allow for flexibility within the market, the application of a 1.25 market factor yields supportable community square feet of 1,150,747 sq. ft. within the 10-minute drive time and 1,798,211 sq. ft.within the 15-minute drive time. Staff Assessment: Based on the data submitted with this petition it cannot be ascertained whether demand exists for additional community commercial square feet at this location. Irregularities in the data presented, such as the use of dwelling unit figures where commercial analyses typically use household figures contributes to these irregularities. Employing dwelling unit figures where households are being analyzed effectively over-estimates demand as household figures would not produce the same results. Derivative over-estimations directly impact the household income calculations for establishing demand. The application of the figures used produce an unrepresentative data set and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate. [Note: A"household" is, by U.S. Census Bureau definition, an occupied dwelling unit. Given the occupancy/vacancy rates in Collier County, there is a significant difference in the number of dwelling units and number of households in a given geography(countywide 67.5%occupancy/32.5%vacancy, but varies by Census Tract).] Another example of inaccuracies produced by irregularities in the data submitted is the use of population numbers-where the data sets based on Census geography may have been split by the market area boundary. These are the Census sub-areas (Blocks or TAZs) used to calculate the population and households within the market area. For those sub-areas only partially within the market area, using whole - not partial - population figures over-calculates demand. The application of the whole figures used produces an unrepresentative data set and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate. One more example of data irregularity is the all-inclusive commercial center types used in the demand calculations and reflected in the Allocation tables appearing in Commercial Needs Analysis. Household incomes available for spending on different goods and services (general merchandise, food, entertainment, etc.) are distributed among all shopping center types and not allocated further specifically to community commercial shopping centers- again, over-calculating demand. The application of the "all center types° figures produces an unrepresentative data set and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate. The Commercial Needs Analysis reports a community commercial square feet supply of 2,437,398 sq. ft. described as existing or potential community commercial floor area in the market area. Staff Assessment: Many of the community shopping centers listed in the Commercial Needs Analysis contain developed outparcels which would seem to be integral components of the community shopping center, yet are excluded. Staff finds an additional 318,540 sq. ft. for an estimated total of 2,755,938 community commercial development (comprised of the outparcels, omitted square feet at existing centers - gardens centers at four different community centers, and differences in square foot allocations for some community centers). See attached staff worksheet The data and analysis submitted to support the request addresses community commercial uses only- but proposed Subdistrict provisions also allow neighborhood commercial development, regional commercial development [including several high intensity C-5, Heavy Commercial uses], all office development, and hotel/motel uses. Staff Assessment: Application materials over-estimate demand for, and under-estimate supply of, community commercial development, and do not provide the supply/demand data & analysis for other -4- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A commercial categories. Without such support, it cannot be ascertained that demand exists at this location for additional neighborhood commercial square feet beyond the square feet already approved in the PUD, or community and regional commercial square feet newly proposed. Apartment Analysis(Refer to Attachment"D", Rental Apartment Survey) The firm of Fishkind and Associates, Inc., conducted a Rental Apartment Survey dated March 11, 2014 with an amended date of July 31, 2014, identifying the supply and demand trends and associated pricing of the rental apartment market in the County. This analysis surveyed more than forty apartment complexes including 100 apartments or more and assessed the housing needs for [market rate]rental apartment, and found the following: • Increasing Average Sizes and Rental Rates • An Increasing Countywide Occupancy Rate: From 88%in 2010 to 97% in 2013 • A Countywide Average Size: z 20 acres • A Countywide Average Density: from z 11 units/acre to a. 13 units/acre • A Countywide Average Unit Count: a 231 units The data and analysis submitted to support the request addresses a specific residential type-rental apartments- and proposed Subdistrict provisions allow only rental apartments. Application materials also review comparable rental condominiums, but do not provide the demand/supply data &analysis for fee simple condominiums, single-family residences or other residential types. Notwithstanding these absences,the demand for market rate apartments can be ascertained. It is important to note that virtually all of the apartment complexes surveyed are located outside the Coastal High Hazard Area, where such densities and unit numbers are appropriate and can be attained. The County's limitations on density are detailed in the Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies section below. Residential Density and Land Use Intensities The FLUE allows density in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, which lies within the CHHA, to exceed 4 dwelling units per acre only for developments qualifying for density bonuses by providing affordable housing. The Subdistrict proposes residential density of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre in a location where 3 dwelling units per acre are allowed [4 dwelling units per acre using the conversion of commercial zoning density bonus, where applicable, or up to an additional 8 dwelling units per acre for affordable workforce housing density bonus]-while no qualifiers for density bonuses are being proposed or met. The Vincentian property presently allows for 4 dwelling units per acre based on the residential component acreage for a maximum of 39 dwelling units. Proposed Subdistrict provisions base density on the entire acreage for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. The amount of residential units is not reduced proportionally with any reduction of acreage devoted to commercial development. By way of comparison, the Whistler's Cove PUD meets affordable housing qualifiers for density bonuses and is approved for a density of 10 dwelling units per acre. Application materials present a basis/rationale for allowing residential density to be calculated based upon total property acreage as an opportunity to maximize the site's development potential-without the density bonus qualifiers met by comparable developments. -5- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A Appropriateness of the Site The Mixed Use Activity Center(MUAC) Subdistrict allows the full array of commercial uses (C-1 thru C-5 Districts) and residential density at a maximum of 16 dwelling units per acre, except within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (max. of 4 DU/A) and Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict(max. of 1.5 DU/A, or 2.5 dwelling units per acre utilizing the transfer of development rights). There are 19 MUACs; each is located at the intersection of two major roads, and they are spaced no closer than two (2) miles apart as measured at intersection midpoints. FLUE Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict provisions allow for establishment of new Activity Centers subject to the following criteria: • Site must be situated at the intersection of two arterial roads or one arterial and one collector road-as identified in the Transportation Element; • Site must be located no closer than two(2)miles from another MUAC; and, • Market justification must be demonstrated. This amendment allows the option of developing the site with commercial uses as allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, with some exclusions, or residential development at 11.74 dwelling units per acre. Essentially, this Subdistrict allows the same commercial development use intensity as the MUAC, and residential development at a higher density than a MUAC within the Urban Coastal Fringe - albeit on 30.6 acres whereas MUAC quadrants were originally 40 acres each (now MUAC quadrants vary from less than 10 acres to roughly 250 acres). No other subdistrict besides MUAC allows the commercial use intensity proposed by this Subdistrict, and few others allow the residential density proposed or the density calculation based on total site acreage within a mixed use project. The subject site does not meet the first two criteria for establishing a new Activity Center and may not meet the third criterion. Community Desires (Refer to Attachment"C", Vision for the East Trail Corridor, and NIM comments toward the end of this Report.) Staff understands that this Vision document was not prepared at BCC direction nor presented to and accepted by the BCC. Nonetheless,staff offers the following observations: • General Urban areas in [East Trail Corridor] Segment 1 and Segment 2 are envisioned to be primarily low to medium density residential in nature but should provide opportunities for mixed use developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping and public parks, squares and greens. The present Vincentian PUD satisfies this vision (at a density of 4 dwelling units per acre),while the proposed Subdistrict would not (with a density of more than 11 dwelling units per acre). • The vision for[East Trail Corridor] Segment 2 does not seek more hotels or other non-community commercial uses, while the proposed Subdistrict allows hotels [and many of these other non- community commercial uses]. These inconsistencies between the proposed Subdistrict text and the Vision document do not lend support to the request. People attending the Neighborhood Information Meeting raised questions and concerns related to site design and land uses. Find more information in the NIM Synopsis below. Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies within the Growth Management Plan As previously noted, the subject site lies within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (UCF) and the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA encompasses all of the UCF, some lands north of US 41 East, and some lands north of the City of Naples (mostly west of US 41). The UCF Subdistrict reads as follows: The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Conservation designated area (primarily located to the south of the Subdistrict) and the remainder of the Urban designated area (primarily located to the north of the Subdistrict). The Subdistrict -6- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A comprises those Urban areas south of US 41, generally east of the City of Naples, and generally west of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands, but excludes Section 13, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, and comprises approximately 11,354 acres and 10%of the Urban Mixed Use District. The entire Subdistrict is located seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area Boundary. In order to facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area, residential densities within the Subdistrict shall not exceed a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfers of Development Rights, and except as allowed by certain FLUE Policies under Objective 5, and except as provided in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. New rezones to permit mobile home development within this Subdistrict are prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development." The CHHA reads as follows: "Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) defines the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA boundary is generally depicted on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. New rezones to permit mobile home development shall not be allowed within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining to the expenditure of public funds for public facilities within the CHHA." Historically, the State has discouraged increasing density within the CHHA(so as to direct population concentration away from known or predicted coastal high hazards and not to negatively affect hurricane evacuation times). For the most part, so has the County. Only two density bonuses are applicable in the CHHA- affordable-workforce housing, and conversion of commercial zoning [that has been deemed consistent by policy]; other density bonuses are not applicable within the CHHA. By way of example, the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay(depicted on the FLUM and generally encompassing lands along Davis Blvd./US 41 East/Airport-Pulling Rd./Bayshore Dr.), now entirely within the CHHA, promotes redevelopment, especially of mixed use projects. When the County drafted the GMP amendment to create this Overlay in 2000, it included a traditional density bonus as an incentive (ask for density increase via rezoning process) which would have allowed an overall increase of density in the CHHA. The State objected. The County responded by revising the amendment to establish a density pool derived from previously entitled density from the Naples Botanical Gardens site(the density allowed by the zoning of that site prior to its rezoning to PUD); this was acceptable to the State. This density pool provides for increased density of projects within the Overlay via a reallocation of density, not a creation of new density, thus the overall density within the CHHA is not increased. For most rezones within the UCF, density is limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, and typically just 3 dwelling units per acre due to the density reduction factor of minus 1 dwelling units per acre for lying within the CHHA. The primary exception to 3 or 4 dwelling units per acre is for provision of affordable-workforce housing, a density bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. The conversion of commercial zoning bonus is applicable in the UCF only to the extent of increasing density back to the cap of 4 dwelling units per acre[4 DU/A(base density)minus 1 DU/A(CHHA reduction)=3 DU/A; +1 DU/A (conversion of commercial zoning bonus) = 4 DU/A maximum eligible density for market rate housing]. Outside of the UCF but still within the CHHA, the density cap is 16 dwelling units per acre, not 4 dwelling units per acre [4 DU/A(base density) minus 1 DU/A(CHHA reduction) = 3 DU/A; +16 DU/A (conversion of commercial zoning bonus) = 16 DU/A maximum eligible density for market rate housing]. Under the FLUE's density rating system, density is based upon the total site acreage less commercial and industrial acreage, and less any acreage for uses with a residential density equivalency established in the LDC; and, eligible density is not an entitlement. For the subject site, the maximum eligible density is 3 dwelling units per acre for market rate housing or 11 dwelling units per acre for -7- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A affordable-workforce housing (30 acres total minus 8.5 acres commercial tract= 21.5 acres x 3 DU/A =65 DUs, or,x 11 DU/A=237 DUs). Note:the existing PUD allows 4 dwelling units per acre, but this density is based solely on the acreage of the residential tracts(9.8 acres x 4 DU/A=39 DUs). Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 12.1.2 reads as follows: "Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times." The applicant responds that consistency is met by agreeing to provide, as requested by the Bureau of Emergency Services Director, a portable generator for use at emergency shelters. Hurricane Mitigation Requirements Collier County Emergency Management has reviewed the PUD and the associated hurricane mitigation needs to aid in evacuation refuge efforts for this site. Staff has determined that the best • mitigation effort for this PUD would be for an off-site nearby public-shelter as is typically the shelter of last-resort. These shelter(s) are determined and announced as the storm approaches Collier County based on storm's intensity, surge model, direction of travel, time of day and day of week impact among others factors. Collier County is therefore requiring the developer to provide a new towable, quiet running, extended run-time towable 45kW (minimum-kW) generator per Emergency Management's specifications. The towable generator will be a one-time developer contribution based on the number of units currently permitted to meet the hurricane mitigation impact for evacuation concerns. The generator specifications must be pre-approved by the Department of Emergency Management as the County has certain interoperable standards and required safety options. The towable generator allows for additional evacuee capacities at various shelter(s)that can be used based on the storm factors referenced above. • (Dan E. Summers, Director Department of Emergency Management] Environmental Impacts Passerella and Associates submitted an environmental report, dated October 2013. Collier County Department of Natural Resources personnel reviewed this petition and provided the following analysis: The subject site is an undeveloped 30.68 acre parcel located on the south side of US 41 in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. Surrounding properties are developed with residential and commercial uses,with no preserves or undeveloped land containing native vegetation abutting the subject site. The majority of the subject site is forested with native vegetation, mainly slash pine and pine/cypress vegetative communities. Exotic vegetation occupies most of the site,with 50 to 100 percent coverage with exotic vegetation. Also on-site are approximately 12.66 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Wetlands on-site are isolated with no hydrological connection to wetlands or waters off-site. Listed species surveys were conducted on the subject site on March 6, 2012 and April 7, 1998 by the environmental consultant for the petitioner. No listed wildlife species or signs of listed wildlife species were observed on the property. A literature search by the environmental consultant found no documented occurrences of listed wildlife species on the property and the property not to be located in any state or federal agency designated habitat areas for listed wildlife species. A letter from the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources indicates no significant archaeological of historical sites recorded for or likely to be present within the subject area. The letter also states that because of the property location and/or nature it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. The site is subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical -8- CP-2013-10/P120130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A sites as required by Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 11.1.3. The provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the Land Development Code(LDC). The subject site is not located within any County well field protection zones. The proposed GMP amendment allows for the off-site retention of all the native vegetation required to be retained on the subject property. Much of the subject site appears to already qualify for the off-site retention of native vegetation provision in the LDC, which allows for preserves with 75 percent or more coverage with exotic vegetation to be satisfied off-site. To insure the entire preserve requirement can be satisfied off-site, an exemption to the restrictions in the LDC provision has been included in the GMP amendment. Requests for deviations to the native vegetation retention requirements in the GMP and LDC are allowed pursuant to Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME)Policies 6.1.1 (10& 13).The CCME Policies are as follows. Policy 6.1.1 (10)CCME The County shall adopt land development regulations that allow for a process whereby a property owner may submit a petition requesting that all or a portion of the native vegetation preservation retention requirement to be satisfied by a monetary payment, land donation that contains native vegetative communities equal to or of a higher priority as described in Policy 6.1.1 (4)than the land being impacted, or other appropriate method of compensation to an acceptable land acquisition program, as required by the land development regulations. The monetary payment shall be used to purchase and manage native vegetative communities off-site. The land development regulations shall provide criteria to determine when this alternative will be considered. The criteria will be based upon the following provisions: a. The amount,type, rarity and quality of the native vegetation on site; b. The presence of conservation lands adjoining the site; c. The presence of listed species and consideration of Federal and State agency technical assistance; d. The type of land use proposed, such as, but not limited to, affordable housing; e. The size of the preserve required to remain on site is too small to ensure that the preserve can remain functional;and f. Right of Way acquisitions for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area. The land development regulations shall include a methodology to establish the monetary value, land donation, or other appropriate method of compensation to ensure that native vegetative communities not preserved on-site will be preserved and appropriately managed off-site. Policy 6.1.1 (13)CCME The County may grant a deviation to the native vegetation retention requirements of sub-sections 2,4, 5, 10, and 12 of this Policy, and shall adopt land development regulations to set forth the process for obtaining a deviation. The regulations shall allow for the granting of a deviation by the appropriate review board after a public hearing, and for the granting of a deviation administratively. The County shall consider the amount and type of native vegetation and the presence of listed species in determining whether the granting of a deviation requires a public hearing, or may be granted administratively. The County may grant a deviation if: a. County, Federal or State agencies require that site improvements be located in areas which result in an inability to meet the provisions of this Policy, or -9- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A b. On or off-site environmental conditions are such that the application of one or more provisions of this Policy is not possible or will result in a preserve area of lesser quality,or c. The strict adherence to these provisions will not allow for the implementation of other Plan policies that encourage beneficial land uses. Given the above, staff supports the request to allow for off-site retention of native vegetation. Pursuant to Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances, the project requires review by the [CCPC acting in their capacity as the] Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). A deviation to the provisions in the LDC on when native vegetation can be satisfied off-site is being requested through the GMP amendment.The applicable provision from Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances is provided below. (m) Scope of land development project reviews.The EAC shall review the following: (1) Any PUD that requests a deviation from environmental standards of the LDC or any development order that requests a deviation from the provisions identified in GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13). [Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist Surface Water&Environmental Planning Section] Historical and Archaeological Impacts The historical and archaeological characteristics inherent to the subject site are addressed in application materials. In a letter dated May 18, 1998 the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources writes, "a review of the Florida Site File indicates no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the subject area, and that "it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected." Traffic Capacitv/Traffic Circulation Impact Study Analysis, Including Transportation Element Consistency Determination Trebilcock Consulting Solutions submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS), dated October 18, 2013. The substantive review of this document was done by the Transportation Planning Section, and their review comments are provided below. The petition indicates that [the subject site] is intended to have a corporate headquarters based, mixed-use project. The new Subdistrict however, allows for all commercial, all residential, or mixed- use (commercial and residential) development. The TIS analyzes it as a shopping center within a single-use scenario and within a mixed-use scenario. Additional uses that exceed the trip generation limits of the shopping center use have been proposed(i.e.gas station). The land uses proposed are reconciled with the analysis in the TIS, reviewing the trip generation characteristics of each potential use. The most impactful combination of trip generators has been selected at the maximized square footage they could achieve, and a trip generation "cap" has been developed that will become a condition of approval [in the companion PUD]. The proposal may be considered consistent with the Transportation Element of the GMP by way of implementing this Trip Generation Cap at the zoning phase as a mitigation strategy to limit their impacts(which meets Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element). Implementing the Trip Generation Cap ensures the TIS will be consistent with the categorized land uses, and the PUD and FLUM will be consistent with one another. [John Podczerwinsky, Project Manager Transportation Planning Section] -10- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda item 9.A Public Facilities Impact Development within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is addressed in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). CCME Objective 3 and related Policies limit public expenditures in the CHHA for certain public facilities needed to support new development permitted by the Future Land Use Element. Application materials present the public facilities needed to support the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict as follows: • Water: The subject site will be served by Collier County Water District potable water treatment and distribution system. Depending upon the development scenario (all commercial, all residential, or mixed-use development),the estimated demand for potable water for the project ranges from 28,000 to 42,000 gallons per day [Peak demand: from 78 to 117 gallons per minute]. • Wastewater: The subject site will be served by the Collier County Sewer District wastewater collection and treatment system. Depending upon the development scenario, the estimated demand for wastewater for the project ranges from 25,000 to 38,000 gallons per day [Peak demand:from 69 to 106 gallons per minute]. • Solid Waste Disposal: The service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The Annual Update and Inventory on Public Facilities (AUIR) indicates the County has sufficient landfill capacity up to the year 2065 for the required lined cell capacity. • Stormwater Management: Future development is expected to comply with the SFWMD and/or Collier County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of stormwater events by both on-site and off-site improvements. • Park and Recreational Facilities: There are no anticipated adverse impacts to park facilities from the proposed development. • Schools: There are no anticipated adverse impacts to public school facilities from the proposed development. • Emergency Medical and Fire Protection Services:The subject site is located within the Golden Gate Fire District. The proposed increases of commercial intensity and floor area and increases of residential density and dwelling units are anticipated to have minimal impacts on these safety services. [Kris Van Lengen, Principal Project Manager Public Utilities Planning&Project Management Dept.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM)SYNOPSIS: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM)required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was[duly advertised, noticed and] held on Thursday, July 17, 201, 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting Rm. "B", located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples. Approximately 16 people other than the application team and County staff attended-and heard the following information: The applicant's agent provided a full description of the proposed GMP amendment to the group, including that the amendment has a companion petition to amend the PUD. Together they will allow for flexibility in design,in terms of allowing a mixture of uses. The applicant desires any residential development to be higher density at market rate, and indicated a commitment to preclude affordable housing. People voiced their concerns regarding affordable housing and supported the applicant's commitment to develop only market rate housing. People voiced their concerns regarding storm events and water run-off, and the distances water management facilities, buffer plantings and berms would be to their properties. They also discussed -11- CP-2013-101 PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A interconnection with the Hitching Post Plaza, and suggested that these features [indicated above] be designed to not obstruct interconnection and afford the ability to create access. Land uses on both side of this property boundary would need to be configured or reconfigured to keep this option open- and both the applicant and the speakers were encouraged to pursue this further. People voiced their concerns about the height limitations on buildings for the variety of different uses allowed, such as the multi-family residential buildings, senior living facilities, hotels, and so forth. The applicant's agent described their design as one providing"good"separation and substantial landscape buffers. Aside from the concerns summarized above no one in attendance expressed opposition to the proposed GMP amendment. The meeting was completed by 6:30 p.m. (Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The following findings and conclusions result from the reviews and analyses of this request: • The subject site was approved in 1999 for mixed use development only - not stand-alone commercial or residential development. The approved density of 4 dwelling units per acre based only upon PUD residential tracts acreage yields less density than allowed by the FLUE (39 vs. 65 DUs). • More than 12,000 approved but un-built dwelling units are proximate to this site, with application materials explaining why this existing inventory cannot be used to meet the demand for more apartments. • The proposed Subdistrict limits residential development to market rate apartments only. • Subdistrict allows residential density of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre in a Coastal High Hazard Area location where additional dwelling units (beyond 4 DU/A) can only be attained when qualifying for an affordable workforce housing density bonus, but no qualifiers for density bonuses are met. • The amount of residential units in mixed use developments are typically reduced proportionally with the amount of acreage devoted to commercial development, but this Subdistrict bases residential density on the entire acreage allowing for 360 dwelling units. • To represent shopping practices in typical market analyses, a declining household percentage is applied to the three drive times,the farther from the subject site the market area extends. • Significant impacts to public facilities, as defined in the Capital Improvement Element,with respect to Transportation, Potable Water Supply, Wastewater Treatment, Stormwater Management and Solid Waste Disposal facilities will not result from this amendment. • Based on data and analysis submitted for the supply of existing and potential commercial development and demand within the market area for the subject site, the additional need for the proposed commercial uses contemplated by this amendment to serve the surrounding residential areas cannot be ascertained/has not been demonstrated. • Adverse environmental impacts will not result from this amendment. Staff finds that the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment does not support the proposed changes to introduce a new Subdistrict by redesignating the subject site from the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. - 12- CP-2013-10/P120130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient. [HFACJ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CP-2013-10, as submitted, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation not to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend transmittal as proposed by petitioner, staff recommends the following revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. only- not intended to change allowable uses, intensities, development standards or other items of substance): Note: Words underlined are added -as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words are deleted-as proposed by staff. Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element: 17. Vincentian Mixed-Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, acid is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East j 411 1U I1 Tamiamj Trei , as=shavoi and is depicted on the Vincentien Mix d Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to PrOvideAsay for EHTliidtere=of neighborhood o€ community commercial development; residential development; and _mixed use (commercial and r identi6l) develoument The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict and/or the greater Naples area,, and fQ provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. ' ' • cieveiourawatE The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses:All uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, both by right andly as conditional uses, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of below. - -b. _ - °__ - =_ :-':• - - _ __ _ ' .1'.' -. - - 1. Pawn shops(5932), 2. Adult book stores, adult video rental or sales, or any other use that is defined as a "sexually oriented business"in the Collier County Code of Laws, 26-151 et seq., 3. Animal specialty services except veterinary (0752); except outside kenneling and dog grooming are permitted, 4. Automatic merchandising machine operators(5962) 5. Correctional institutions(9223), 6. Crematories(7261), 7. Farm product raw materials(5153-5159) 8. Fishing,commercial(0912-0919), -13- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda item 9.A 9. Fuel dealers(5983-5989). 10. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens, 11. Installation or erection of building equipment contractors(1796), 12. Local and suburban passenger transportation L4131-4173), 13. Marinas(4493&4499) , 14. Motor vehicle dealers, used only(5521), 15. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified (7299), Coin operated service machine operations, Comfort station operation, Escort service, Locker rental, Massage parlors (except those employing licensed therapists), Rest room operation. Tattoo parlors, Turkish baths.Wedding chapels, privately operated, 16. Power laundries,family and commercial (7211),and 17.Transfer stations(4212). c. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shag will be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area (GLFAI, e and one hotel (fAei1.maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility(f44614.maximum FAR 0.6). 2. Residential development shall will be limited to a maximum density of 11.74 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the preieet property, inclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use jresidential and commercial uses), the residential density lifaitatieff allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of uses a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Commefci; l uses shall •; Ii ited to those uses •ermitted • ri•ht in the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts. 4. Under any of the development scenarios above, the average weekday pm peak hour entering/exiting trip generation shall not exceed 1,107 total trips. 5. Only one automobile service station is allowed: it may be located eeffw+tted anywhere within the Subdistrict excpot, for mixed use development, shall be [united to the commercial tract. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility are allowed . 6. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. d. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD, Planned Unit Developments The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses and : 1- '1 •- .fir •1. - 101'111 -1S -I•-_ I /:•,: .\ • 1 1< . ' .1. II • operation are comsat•Ie with surroundin• land uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with ;me-of the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development aut will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. • -14- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A 5. 4.Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties,where feasible, and between internal buildings. 6. b Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 7. 5_,,The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building height, but not less than 25 feet. bees. 9. L At the time of Site Development: the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off-site, except that remaining portions of preserve on-site shall be a minimum of one acre in size. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. 10.8. Residential Aa ential development shall be limited to >develseed-as a market-rate rental apartment proiect _-_- -'------_ _ ___:-- _ _ -__.- -_' - - - _= As a second alternative: IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend transmittal-but without the residential component and limiting commercial uses to non-regional commercial development - staff recommends the following revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. AND to eliminate the residential component, attempt to limit commercial to non-regional uses, and limit building floor area): Note: Words underlined are added-as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words are deleted-as proposed by staff. Insert on Page 4-0 11 of the Future Land Use,Element: Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN-MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and lnfill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict - 15- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13.Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15.Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict B. URBAN-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict •*" **• *" ,.: *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** ,** 11. Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict 12. Vincentian Commercial Subdistrict Insert on Page 26 of the Future Land Use Element: 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict LIse-Sobekistfiet; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, Vlncentiart Commercial Subdistrict. in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element: 17.Vincentian Coi-nmercialUse Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, awl is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East(US 411, US " ami^-si Tmmil _act ory-6346W44 and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to sfevide allow for c c oeiubber4soci of community commercial development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict and/or the areater Naples and - _-= - - • •rovide em•to ment o••ortunities for residents in the surrounding area. - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- 7 - _ - - - The •- - ..11-1 • i' Subdistrict •- •I•• 2- • •,i 1• - i y••1 �� _ •� -1• standards: a. Allowable uses;All uses allowed by right in the C-4 zoning districts,as listed in• the CplligES2,.1i._- '1• 9 --•Gil-a ••--�- y 1- .. - • _••• '.1. • 1 .•. -16- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A as , except as prohit tiieesr-listed-below. b. -- - --'-' -- := Prohibited uses: 1.Amusempni BIZ• - -. '•a :.'._- a•.•r 2.Automotive vehicle and equipment dealers(5511 and 5591 new vehicles only), 3. Bowling centers, indoor(7933), 4, Motorcycle dealers(5571). 14 11..r:nap(1103 1 1100) c. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall.will be limited to a maximum of 200.000 2 •0,008 square feet of aross • - .. a -- -- • - -- _ "--_ - - and an assisted living facility(wax,maximum FAR 0.6). 4. Z. Under any of the development scenarios above, the average weekday pm peak hour entering/exiting trip generation shall not exceed 1,107 total trips. -17- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A 5. 1 c Only one automobile service station is allowed: it may be located aermi anywhere within the Subdistrict. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility are allowed may-!be mod. 6. 4,A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts, d. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. Planned Unit Development, The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall inclu,ie additional restrictions and standards necessary to insure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The subiect site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with et-tie-t+ s€the first Site Development Ian. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect. to,the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 5. 4 Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties,where feasible,and between internal buildings. 6. Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 7. The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building height,but not less than 25 feet. Bess* 9. Z At the time of Site Development, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off-site, except that remaining portions of preserve on-site shall be a minimum of one acre in size. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. Insert on Page 141 of the Future Land Use Element: Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map - 18- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentlan Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda item 9.A Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian CommercialMiaod-Ielse Subdistrict Map -19- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A PREPARED BY: 41) ' • 4.111 .1 DATE: Corby Schmid AICP, Principa Planner Comprehensiv, Planning Section, Planning And Zoning Department REVIEWED B --. Lt *4 DATE: David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Plan Manager Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning And Zoning Department REVIEWED BY: DATE: 13-7/-�( Mike Bosi,AICP, Director, Planning And Zoning Department APPRO I BY: 12, / DATE:�� ` • /=salanguida, !"nis rato Growth Management Division PETITION NO.: CP-2013-10 I PL-2013-0001767 Staff Report for the August 21, 2014, CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the October 14, 2014, BCC Meeting. CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict com'I s.f.comparison s.f.-staff s.f.-petitioner difference Existing Community Commercial-5 mile 859,358 807,449 51,909 Potential Community Commercial-5 mile 497,467 _ 550,735 (53,268) SUM 5 mile 1,356,825 1,358,184 (1,359) Existing Community Commercial-10 mile 924,985 852,558 72,427 Potential Community Commercial-10 mile 347,500 327,000 20,500 SUM 10 mile 1,272,485 1,179,558 92,927 Existing Community Commercial-15 mile 422,773 336,564 86,209 Potential Community Commercial-15 mile 2,333,165 2,100,834 232,331 SUM 15 mile 2,755,938 2,437,398 318,540 SUM Marco I 110,532 1 110,596 1 (64)1 ISUM of Existing&Potential Community Commercial 1 5,495,780 1 5,085,736 ( 410,044 l conclusion: staff estimates a total of 410,044 s.f.more community commercial development than petitioner \\—......„...A...\GM D-LDSCD ES P,...,..S«,,,..\C.,.,o.......,.\COMP PLANNING GM DATA\C..,.R.n Am...-.,,..\2013 C,.,..&S..,t S..,.P.....12013 C,.,.3-O...e..\CP-2013-10, .../A...2014 RESOLUTION NO. 14- 2 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 10 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 307 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF.60 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .60. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN. THE C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-3 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 31 ±ACRES. [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,. the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans;and WHEREAS, Petitioner, Robert J. Mulhere FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA on behalf of Global Properties, LLC, has initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map Series; and [14-CMP-00931/1129 173/1] 58—Rev. 10/31/14 1 Words underlined are additions;Words stmeli-thr-augh are deletions *** *** *** ***are a break in text WHEREAS, on August 21, 2014 and September 4, 2014, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners;and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners, at a public hearing, approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty(30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty(180)days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this day of cn kc-- , 2014. ATTEST: BOARD OF C UNTY C JMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER NTY, ' ORIDA at,1:("3 if BY: D put 4--7c TOM HENNING, Chairman Attest as ' an% signature only. [14-CMP-00931/1129173/1] 58—Rev. 10/31/14 2 Words underlined are additions;Words struck throug*h are deletions *** *** *** ***are a break in text Approved s to form,Td legality: Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit"A"—text and maps CP114-CMP-0093112 [14-CMP-00931/1129173/1]58—Rev. 10/31/14 3 Words underlined are additions; Words stru..Lj are deletions *** *** *** *** are a break in text PL201 0001767 CP 2013-10 EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT [Page 10] Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land.Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and lnfill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7 Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict >3 Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 0. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology_Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13 Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14 Livingston/Radio Road Commercial lnfill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict *+** *++1 **** **** *+** **** ***a• +A.*.t **A* **** **** [Page 26] 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban M>rlixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict. Office and infill Commercial Subdistrict. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict. Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek. Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infil' Subdistrict. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Vincentian Mixed Use. Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use A;tivrty Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict. Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston RoadlEatonv✓ood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, GoodiettelPlne Ridge Commercial intill Subdistrict: Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay, and, as allowed by certain FLUE pol•ties *.,-** ++** **** +*** ***4 **** *+** ***+ ***:. +*.** .:.*** 1 Words underlined are added: words str v*through are deleted Row of asterisks *e** k*** **-*)denotes break it text ".°Cc.tob>'?014 E:G 1 ra^sn'i ttal�1e'sic,r PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 [Page 46] 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses: The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally, the following uses are allowed: 1. Department store (5311), 2. Hotel (7011, hotel only), 3. Dental laboratories (8072), and 4. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051). b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre. calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10.000 square feet. 4. A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in conjunction with a convenience store) is prohibited; however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility greater than 15,000 square feet of f-CFA are allowed. 5. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. 2 Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. 28 October 2014 BCC Transmittal Version PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 c. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 5. At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site native vegetation must be retained on-site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 141] Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 3 VVords underlined are added; words struck through are deleted. Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. 28 October 2014 BCC Transmittal Version p T 46 S T 47 S T 46 S T 49 S ' T 50 S : T St S T 62 S T 63 S ,.- III ' ' ' ' , 11 '- '- li i 1 I§ R ' 1 A C7 I g t ■ ,13,1 il , , 3 .1,1,i1 ii a;R. I 1 I. I,, ., I- a P' 1".;-.,eil" l'-' !CIO.- iIiIiIiI: IiIiIIIII!':F. . ,"F Ii9-ItIiii:I:E- ii''i.liial 1,111■IiIii'ili: iii IL iii:1114 Iiiiiihig!Ig: ii'Dilii an i g 'n" ? 1 2. '--` 1 i .1 . i 1 ! I' ! 2,,2 2! 2/ 21 31% ,21 P'2I'El 2 2 21 n 7 1 11 –1,- 2 Z ; i "'iz n ,. . gg l'. ■'IBI' e.gr.;, 314 iti .g .2,4,1! I - ! 2I flI mi i i : i 411 ; g' l'Ili1;111q1°1°111i1=111-t 14-15-1,-12-il§-, -ig-g-j1-1 , , • .t. VI . .WL I -3 WIIIV • ' 'i _.UW03 3CYll i('L■ ; 2 '*, * !'l ; i g 1 ..-4P ill 1 i I, M.Nr103 OnnnOne 0 — g 71' n' i' •!? a i 4.4 , „ . 2. „,, 2 , •., XE e• -1 -a 2 `...) Cz,.a,,.V._.,.1 .r-.„• ,1 :..D n gs— 4 R 0•1 I - - , g:r 0 i i i 1 T.: , 1-1-i 1 b'21 2 4 114111 -,, 4 =',N :g ,t i..,-,-. i V .'• 4..... i i ••3 I i D!j'.,i!pig t ION! ag -1 91i i i f ;13. 9,1 .., 3 • = i ?!i Ag 64441'LIPP' wg ; = f I 1 ii g il 411.4 g WO HI i il if i 1 I Ng ,gi, i a - 1 'I- I EWE!IV'ME.NOM :, All 1:1115!: i„t0 'v1 - v — ihillii . . ,-4 i gg-n., i i livii121i § .;4 2 g, i; f= gc i , 1 ; 11;1 i i i i ii r; 3 iighii I e I i 4 / _;",t3 _g- ..; i i ling - _It - ,OZIfg, 1 i , v , I ..., lov t-6-1 g g , _tir,i 1 ig = wtiai --11,„- ! 2 , :: trg qi lig g go! !.1 k i sliriiii 1 I .1 'g.v 3 ; ; t - = e: ,. v 3 - J31 -4. 3 3-.L.v ; i 2 1 g. 48 -, . .1 Nil - IP I ' 1 15 Mil 1 Oil 51 Is" ' 4'45 IN 1 A i I "4 g 2; g ti E §g g _ §I ,`;1 d 1 pg',.; 1 i § o. ...., 1,- g ii ,, , 1 .;‘,; 222 22 2 .;. >2,..... ; ...X.r et 1 111000M 6i;11•111:15SIBINIII0a• ES E E.'„E I ‘g er L_ : i , _.....lesi OM 01.SY, • • ! \ : r I i / < co ,a , • i x - tr o 1 ••••__ • ' I W I 1 ■• — ' , r I 0 i •',., ;it, , .: ' C ''`• ) ,,, .1 • ■ E `' ! . n . .., '• g, 1 `III ::- tI .1 ,7. .•i ,- r., • -. • , IP , • III Bonn , - ' :.--- i P IIIII 111 ,4 -,,: ; - I ' rif W I ,,, /i li ri ., It- — , . )Q... .,-,; ,. . , _ __I _ • i ; , t. ' ''' '' , . • , , I -- — . .::::::-',-- • — - --- , ..,. I ,.,:-..i - . ,, --.._: — .1 : - - : 4... .-.-- - , - Ili -1,-.: :-,,, ---, 0:4::. ,...„ 1 I ,.,i I .i 1,-, , ;-._..-=, 1 `7''5 1' 'MUM a 1 g 5 r...; _,i -- I _ ! — , . ca ; 1 .1:..-i9.g, aft . ....: _:::: ...:: ;,;..""rick ,_ I "ill. 7 c w 0 ,),) . ,/- -, )., u. r';',Il '1 ,-. 3.7,7 • .--- C' 0 3 •••• vr, . li j<' — - 4 .,o, •........... ,... II ' ---,-'1% '' IT- . .t.! ,....._ ,... 7..."-rt•-•-To . .', —,/...- ' , 11 I--, 1....,_4-7,___" • ' ,--`' t' --- ° 11 I' af, „ "__ -‘:--e ,". :i —4.--(-- A „ II E.-" — CC I Ige"-I ca A . 04: 1#: a a I-- v-- i = 1 • P i 11 • --• C.) c,I) ! 5;•T• i.-■ I.■ 1 11 .-:, b, .:1 i ' ----- ..-.J- —''"e .- -',.-- 1., = -- " ---' .__. ro1 u. • , ttO•itgg'i.—— .....:, - - gr.'s!'-.....- ict) atg, .. cip 0 222 GILL f °i 1 S 9t I S I, 1 ' g at 1 s et i s as i , s is .1 s zs i S t9 I (‘ ; -....-' EXHIBIT A PETITION PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 O VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA %--1 i 1 1 ! 1 7" \-Irows.r. ,.- wv E / MIL S4 II 4nmumunn► V 1 ' J 2)‘-N 1 9� 1 Wite (. 9C .4„ i # 4#i*r Pie ift # .1k III_ ## i � ) Aitc4,4,, ## ,ice 4,..c. • 4.tc,& 40 \ . . MINIM 1111111lla1111 �41111111111,11111M DO `1 ?e., I ^AO LEGEND SCALE 1 SUBDISTRICT I I I PREPARED BY GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION 0 1000 FT. 2000 FT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION /PUNNING AND REGULATION DATE 7/2014 RLE CP-2013-10A.DIMG PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission sitting as the local planning agency and the Environmental Advisory Council,will hold a public meeting on Thursday,March 19,2015 at 9:00 A.M.in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY,COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 7.3 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 224 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS,UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 0.6 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 0.6. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-3 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT;AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S.41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST)IN SECTION 32,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 30.68±ACRES. [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(MPUD)ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD,TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 224 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS,UP TO 250,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES,AND A HOTEL LIMITED TO 150 ROOMS AND A 0.6 FLOOR AREA RATIO(FAR)AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY(ALF)AT 0.6 FAR. THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE SUBJECT TO CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE OR IF A HOTEL OR ALF IS CONSTRUCTED.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S.41 IN SECTION 32,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 30.68+/-ACRES;PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-37, THE VINCENTIAN PUD;AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PUDZ-PL20130001726] T9 LELY, A R ORT COMMUNITY '7 NAPLES MANOR (DRI) > 2� w \ T rn O �l 29 28 27 MICEU d ce (S) tG w MYRTLE p% O WOODS WHISTLERS COVE PROJECT TREE TOPS �' LOCATION TRAIL ACRES 32 33 34 VINCENTIAN (5) WENTWORTH ESTATES VICTORIA FALLS All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCES will be made available for inspection at the Planning&Zoning Department, Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite#401 Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning&Zoning Department.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday,March 19,2015 will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P.Strain,Chairman Collier County Planning Commission Collier County,FL No.231123961 February 27.2015 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER PLZO13o6onc7/C1 DATE RECEIVED 3.3 . 1S- PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE September 26, 2013 DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 (Fax 239-252-2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant: Christopher Shucart, c/o Global Properties of Naples, LLC Company Global Properties, LLC Address 2614 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 615 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-0098 Fax Number 239-692-8527 B. Name of Agents * Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP and Richard Yovanovich, Esquire • THESE ARE THE PEOPLE TP CONTACT FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Robert J. Mulhere/Hole Montes, Inc. Address 950 Encore Way City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34110 Phone Number 239-254-2000 Fax Number 239-254-2099 Company: Richard Yovanovich, Esquire/Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, PA Address 4001 Tamiami-Trail North City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-3535 Fax Number 239-435-1218 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record Global Properties of Naples, LLC Address 2614 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 615 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-0098 Fax Number 239-692-8527 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. 1 Norm Trebilcock,AICP, P.E.,Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. 1205 Piper Boulevard,Suite 202, Naples, FL 34110 Bethany Brosious,Senior Ecologist I, Passarella &Associates, Inc. '1 13620 Metropolis Avenue,Suite 200, Fort Myers, FL 33912 II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Global Properties of Naples, LLC 100% James Shucart, Manager 97% Christopher Shucart, Manager 3% 2614 Tamiami Trail N.,Suite 615 Naples, FL 34103 2 E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (x) leased ( ): 11-3-2010 Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Attachment "A" B. GENERAL LOCATION Corner of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East Section 32, Township 50S, Range 26E, Folio No. 00439880008 C. PLANNING COMMUNITY South Naples D. TAZ 311 E. SIZE IN ACRES 30±acres F. ZONING Vincentian PUD G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN See Attachment "B" H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and Coastal High Hazard Area Overlay 3 IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element X Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) OF THE ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: cep Atfnr-hrAn+ "R'i C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Urban Designation, Mixed Uses District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, TO Urban Designation, Mixed Use District ,Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN l"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit A-1 Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit A-2 Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries,source, and date. Exhibit A-3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit B-1 Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands,with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. 4 C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit C-1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit C-1 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5%of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes,indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-11.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit E-2 Potable Water (See attached Public Facilities Report) Exhibit E-2 Sanitary Sewer (See attached Public Facilities Report) Exhibit E-3 Arterial &Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS (See attached Traffic Impact Statement) N/A Drainage N/A Solid Waste N/A Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public 5 facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit E-1 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection,schools and emergency medical services. 3. Attachment "B" Document proposed services and public facilities,identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools,fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exhibit F-1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence,if applicable. (Identified on l �iiiier l.ounty Lon■ng yaps) N/A _Traffic-Congestion_BoundaryJfap.plicable Y Coastal Management Boundary,if applicable N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Y $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) N/A $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Y Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner(See attached form) Y 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed,25 copies of the complete application will be required. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1"=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. 6 . LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN I We hereby authorize Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP and Richard Yovanovich, Esquire (Name of Agents) to serve as our Agents in • equest to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting propert ••e tified in th. • iic•tion. Signed: = me rit - Date:I°f(It A__Jlobal Properties of Naples, LLC / J. ,s Shucart Ma ager • J Date: I �. 1 / 13 Signed: •ai Prope ies of Naples, LLC Christopher Shucart, Manager We hereby certify that we have the authority to make the foregoing application,and that the application is true,correct and complete to the bes • •ur knowle.a -, A 4 � gnature of Applicant idef James Shucart, Manager N. e- ype• _ • inted �ure of App nt Christopher Shucart, Manager Name-Typed or Printed STATE OF . ( Ci. s\., ) COUNTY OF ( Co A,•e c ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2-1 day of (C &2e-i ,2013 by 6,�-J -6,,,- .e ;, MY COM Ccir'�r�Cg1REC z-1 I�v t±011 . y , Notary Public " - ANN R.TOMLINSON �r»" �._ Notary Public-State of Hor=I 0 CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 't:,,," )ice= My Coduu. is Apr 23.201 ; sror;_ce� Commission IA FF 11307 _ who is personally known to me, _ - ---......irmit who has produced as identification and. ) did take an Oath " .as0= %_,i,., TOWSON i did not take and Oath tic rY -Weld NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: ' y t,- C ni.F €rti A n M17 4 ,r• Cei!ei; tf 11307 Florida Statute Section 837,06 - False Official Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of%500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 7 INSTR 4492154 OR. 4620 PG 1385 RECORDED 11/3/2010 2:26 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DOC @.70 $'!4,175.00 REC $27.00 CONS $2,025,000.00 I This Document Prepared By and Return to: Mark S.Weinberg,Esq. GrayRobinson,P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue,Suite 1600 Miami,FL 33131 Parcel ID Number: 00439880008 Speci 1 _zx..: _ ,E. eed . _ \ /` • re. J This Indenture, Made this Zi y ff rt_- ' ^ _� . . _ 2010 A.D., Between, Special Acquisitions Holdings, Inc.,'a ccirpo;.`t Ili g E a'r i laji if e State of Florida, grantor, and Global Properties of Naples,LL 1 loci m e• 1 a 'i ity pn p 'y hose address is: 2614 Tamiami Trail.North,Suite 615,Naples,Floe 4 r,gran Witnesseth that the GRANTOR,for and in k eration of the sum of i- ° ° TEN DOLLARS($10) ��----�-� DOLLARS,and other good an 'it Ie consideration to G d paid by GRANTEE,the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,has granted,bargained and s ;�' aid GRANTEE and E`S heirs, successors and assigns forever,the following described land,situate,lying and beinginthe qty°4. Io'rida to wit: SEE ATTACHED EDIT"A" Subject to: 1.Real estate taxes for the year 2010 and subsequent years;and 2. Covenants,restrictions,and public utility easements of record,without any intention to re-impose same; and existing zoning and governmental regulations. AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said Iand in fee simple;that the Grantor hag good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land;and Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land against claims arising by,through or under the Grantor and will defend same against the claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor,but none other. In Witness Whereof,the grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. i • OR 4620 PG 1386 Signed,sealed and delivered in our presence: " Special Acquisitions Holdings,Inc. 644/f/j144 By: ( al.G �" (Seal) Printed Name: flA1t �-`gin. )of i( Alma Shucichart Witness Title: Vice President. Y.O.Address:6435 Naples Boulevard j� Naples,FL 34109 Printed Name: a i A - _ FMS (Corporate Seal) Witness - 1A- CO STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Collier ,) The foregoing instrument was ckt}b ed ` e ethis� 4421 day\f pdemLer" ,2010 .-. by Alma Shnekhart, as Vice Pres deaf off'SJ cifal o ntgs, Inc., a Florida Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is e sih y • o n _o i <<� e"ha.s(prd4uc-d his Florida driver's license as C." ,,R L identification. '- - p0UUAM.THRis" ` -- PrintedNT� .►,an .. rd e Public-My Comm.Expkuu a Jul 7,2014 Notary 1nNi � - f r 'TS Commission#DO208753• og,glait'- .ires:Hi,AP/`.( %e p Bonded Throbgb National*Amy Assn. - • m��. *** OR 4620 PG 1387 XXIT"A" LEGAL DESCR1 g TION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUT,u, 11:"73_ 4"rall'aTv_ FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46"WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32,A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN -WAY LINE INTERSECTION'EDITH THE,SOUT ��}_., �`�i:1. JOINT OF OF U.S.HIGHWAY NO.41 T• ■.. , BEGINNING; THENCE CONT ` SOUTH Q2°- ,'f1' :'NEST ADISTANC IF4.02 ALONG SAID FAST LINE OF`SE 'I�ON� ;�_SEA ®I�3� FEET TO THE EAST QU E CORN R ) • C IDES AND THE NORTH LIME O L t UNIT 3 AS RECORDED I :I1�• T 03 p.. ,:F, Ski T� _ �y SOF CO - yI' .,, }. 1 Ni, 1 '.I) (\ k$D PUBLIC RECORDS `<.. .F 189, BY INSI`RUMENT RECORI�I 1 ) FICIAt RF )' ) , 1 THENCE RUN Ot`TI{87°30'18" WE k_. 13 PAGE 792); '� FORMER NORTH LINE O ACRES U � /f IIE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRE$ ' T 4 AS RECOPTEki FIAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID P '•; 1 RD O ''OILIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,A DISTANCE 0 3'?96 T'1 DICE RUNT NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG NORTH LINE OF SAID LINE RAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE I°T UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,A DISTANtCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO O S WITH RIGHT- . O -WAY INTERSECTION F . HIGHWA NO.1 TAM[ TRAIL); THENCE RUN SQUTH 39°03'26"EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET,A. CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH. 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY;THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. • ATTACHMENT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLL11--a COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 884.02 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS FORMERLY IN TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 94 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (VACATED BY INS'IRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 189, PAGE 792); THENCE RUN NORTH 87°30'18" WEST ALONG SAID FORMER NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLI FR COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 695.96 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL); THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 PEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. • , 1 1>+31> � x r �,♦ �� c rn 1 i Nri si.„ #4, lommoillim. -,- „.„, — , .4 Allilaigiii ____.-ii-....._ ___, iii. 4 . Cn A II 111111 'PA •$'4,,,,,,,,),4.4 , m ›X Alk % 4i *$!€t; \A No Cm o–i/<c —mil m r� `� IIP‘ 41, cn 4 4 ■ .c\ 4\ c> N ■ er e 4 4c # 4 rpo& •°.\. 4 s v. • `'.,$.; 04 * z .4 (0, ,,- 4 ,, „, > 111*, 40 , \'',1 .CN. MN n.*, MN *4.i f$%1 z III 70 r,y cn III I .11. 2 ri 5 m z ,,�� .III o , _. I o I = m %`,�► ;gFVc F Ill 1111111MIN 1111 A PAII1111111. H = Z O w w ow p 4, N , O = mO , o o 7 trl I p O .• 1111111111110■ 1 °mom 21a4"112".1111111111110 III so. ‘1111 H 30 3 ;47, Cr/ r r 0 0 z m ^� a� �•ls N N'O CO r- ' n ~ m wm .� _ _ -. . 7 n (p N m N * m p .� c�> .. .�'11 / �.-.0 X . :411:::- P 1-n Aga AP-. *slaw # ..11111esiummorp . % 41r rm ��' I�' 411 P ■� �I 1 Ili 0 I C X 41011 11114 cn n p IMMO O CO X MINIM w • Z Cl) .z, t },-D I m ' 21111111h ( Dm S 7 �+ P7 t111• n �J 'h ' w_ l mu� w ; j q , ./.., . ,, • _,„.,.... ,__Irri •..,, - -/'' ' ,, \ To r .ci ..4 -,... 2 x rm y �o o � , •,t r RFSO D Z Z � 'g 1 i � n % x ail €D C ti 0 a as r) m - w �� , o Nil n NOr m ,� ' :1 � pl � * m _p d;;L'c �M i `- ,N A Z 7 +F C7 Z *: U .E• ( A .<",,,,.+ r t,,1 . , MFv 2 _ 3mia.m.-0-3■- i, s . _G ' `, i+t iL,i CA • • - . ,i,.._44•.zi.4.7,-1... ,- . ..- 1r,,,It.,4 . — ' �� tea` S�[ 41:. _ ii ' •�.. -� d e - � .. µ �6.�r. •jd� r -. 1 • rC � � 4_ It _ I, • , r' , � .� 1� ..f �-, � ` ,v. -1:,- //I/. ''' '.• - r P d * "1 y,. ..a , ;y� gyp . y 7771J/ �) , I . , , , . •: , , .... . ,:.:41‘,, ,,',n' 1-.',A4'."- v, a -',',- „lt•0411 ._ ,,,,., '1-"'• Ir. At.' -:-,....,„;V,-.•-te. ..,71 - „_ ''' - --0 ,-1.., *C . ‘ s'•;`,.. '-', .„,„,-,, .1,0....... 4. .,. Jd ;;J : fi a w ti a� `�` {, ut •rr; Amok allw, 'Ur 1 p. l i .®®® 7) C '•Ag ♦ ♦s. _� III _W_ x Ilk"1"-- &A• .♦ 4 A bs, N 5,1 & Til e .1. 4 ';' tcN . • 0) F ..Ar :CJ O -I C r 0 -.Wag mr31 ■♦ 0 C> • 4 , -a c .c.;C‘ .< • cn 70 • 4,po. •6 .'\411 4 ,\- * nl 4 \* o ,- Z v -• v ♦. N 44, z � �' �� " `.4 VIII cn 7:1 — 1111 -o mn Hn ,III p 11 > C > c m ;I ..m Dzm o C) : 0 nr / Illlllll > ° I "V/ --' CO ID w r — a,8 0 0 : _ I w w w O O = m0 Y = � � O iC Nm K C7 0 ro O w 0 N O r" O i X 1 Fri N t ril-, 2 q O g # Tim. ing jeS111.,_ AI %Wk. m ,) w m o r I awl om,DNg 3J Z �,ay. zEi �r0 D G7 ... r 0 p a w m m p;* -3 -I ON S O O`.< 2>-n /• A1MPO I �� 111/ 1111111 v ��%OP ','',4 .. ,, m 4/1* r- m 4 w Aff # 2 010 go G. Ct ZW W 2 lop . , EN IN *4.r sit .0 4111Mt to il 110 , i,ç), S4t% S m co 00 c a 71c r-0 ‘4. q! . e « < 0 T o©o* C) 2 < -Nn v s 1- w a� 00 to r-4 o m 71 4 C ONI S mm r"m D< 0rn4" m Oom-I -rim c-p g o 0 D z g e rm- Z�� ..4(1) 0> Cu)C b to g P3 0 a z 0 0 d X17 .0'd am_ 9mr -rCm m m m rn rs, z mm m ij� Co 3 z x xi m c m a > m >r- v O : D h h C7 Xl Z r - m r C! c "<93 0 0 r w m G3 O N n C O 04 O O -: W �'� �. ID Sp �° Sp Z CA ATTACHMENT "B" JUSTIFICATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is located at the "T" intersection of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail East). See GMPA Attachment "A" for the legal description of the subject parcel. The subject parcel is 30.68 acres +/- in size. The land use designation is presently Urban, Mixed Use District Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, in the Coastal High Hazard Area Overlay. The property is zoned PUD, allowing for residential uses, ALF, and commercial (a variety of C-3 uses, all C-2 uses, and several C-4 uses). The PUD does not provide a specific breakdown of acreage dedicated to commercial use; however, the master plan depicts about +/-8.0 acres in the commercial tract(s) leaving +/- 22.6 acres to be calculated for residential density (yielding +/-90 dwelling units). The PUD has been sunsetted. The surrounding lands, on the south/west side of US 41 are all designated Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. The lands across U.S. 41 (to the north/east) are designated Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The zoning and actual lands use on surround lands is as follows: North: Vacant C-5 commercial, Trail Acres RSF 4 (developed) and across U.S. 41 Whistler's Cove PUD Multifamily Development East: Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, Zoned "MH"; and Hitching Post Commercial Plaza, Zoned "C-3"; across US 41, Eagle Lakes Community Park "P" and County owned lands for wastewater reclamation area, Zoned "A" Ag. South: Trail Acres RSF 4 (developed) West: Trail Acres RSF 4 (developed) J T L,D PS " 4:1",.\\ WHISTLERS COVE COLLIER COUNTY' PROPPKTY \ KID A ZONING ix \ T�RiRIL ftGR=_S�� \ Gi EACIE LAKES ✓ � ♦ VIkIC�TiAtf , ~ .� G(h T"IT4P RI \ c 40, SLWECTPARC_L \ , F ZON73 ki. Y e �) YY ,i• \ i i NN 1 / 0.'3 4 0!t if r.r r 1411-1111§ HITCHING POST �� oe\. TRAIL AGES imp moms HOME FARs t R.S i �,I +1 !! ° MTW WEO'RTH1 es o aroo ESTATES m._, Pt al H:\20I 3\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Attachment B Justification 7-31-14.docx Requested Changes This proposed GMPA would change the designation from Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, to Urban Mixed Use District, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. This will require amending the FLUE and the FLUM. The new Subdistrict will allow for commercial, residential, or mixed-use (commercial and residential) development. Justification for Request The present PUD allows for approximately eight (8) acres of commercial development, with the remaining acreage for residential development at a density not to exceed four(4)units/acre. The subject parcel is unique in that there are very few potential commercial parcels under unified control that have the shape and size that will allow for a variety of options for commercial uses that are desirable in East Naples along the U.S. 41 E ast Corridor. The East Naples Civic Association, several years ago, conducted a preliminary J.S. 4i East corridor planning study. As part of that study, this piece of property was recommended to be a "commercial activity center." This nomenclature should not be confused with the defined Mixed Use Activity Centers located at major intersections in Collier County, but rather a label used to indicate this property's values as a large commercial tract that could accommodate a mixture of commercial uses to serve the East Naples Community. The area would benefit from additional commercial development. This is true both from a market perspective and from a "good for the community" perspective. The change in land use designation will allow for the possibility of a variety of commercial uses and even a corporate headquarter type use such as a Hertz or Arthrex type corporation, or market-rate apartments with or without mixed-use (neighborhood commercial uses). While the FLUE does not explicitly require a commercial needs or market analysis with the submittal of a commercial rezone outside of a Mixed Use Activity Center, a market analysis is provided as additional supporting data and analysis. The study identifies a need for additional commercial uses and a deficiency in lands designated for commercial development to accommodate these uses. Given the size of developable area for residential and the relatively low density now permitted, we do not feel that such low-density residential is feasible in the current market.The site is competing with several large-scale PUDs (consisting of hundreds or thousands of acres) within reasonable proximity (3 miles) of the subject parcel, including Lely Resort, Treviso Bay, Sabal Bay, and Winding Cypress. These master planned communities can offer single-family homes with significant amenities, such as multiple swimming pools, tennis courts, and golf courses. The subject site does not have sufficient space to provide a similarly amenitized community. The table below lists approved PUDs within three miles of the subject site and a count of approved and developed units. These PUDs contain more than 10,000 approved, un-built dwelling units. H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+ResubmittalWttachment B Justification 7-31-14.docx Active PUDs with Un-built Residential Units Acreage Total Units Total Units Total Units Within 3 miles Approved Developed Un-built Artesa Point 280 204 76 81.00 Eagle Creek 470 456 14 298.00 Lands End Preserve 725 78 647 262.90 Lely Resort 10,150 3,805 6,345 2,892.50 Mandalay 84 71 13 28.06 Rockedge 400 - 400 76.42 Saba!Bay(Isles of Collier) 1,999 - 1,999 2,416.08 Shadowwood 574 104 470 168.10 Sierra Meadows 300 36 264 90.80 Wentworth Estates(Treviso Bay) 1,450 214 1,236 1,563.84 Winding Cypress 2,300 1,686 614 1,928.00 TOTAL 18,732 6,654 12,078 9,805.70 Source: Collier County PUD Master List Dated 12/20/13 Additionally, the strongest market attraction within the communities identified above is for a fee- simple development (i.e. condominiums) with a quick return on investment for the developer. As a result, there is a strong demand for market-rate rental apartments. This site is well-situated to provide such market-rate rental apartments, due to its access and exposure to an arterial or collector roadway. A Rental Apartment Survey is submitted as supporting data and analysis for this use. In order to address concerns raised by the neighborhood, the Subdistrict limits residential development to market-rate rental apartments, as there is a substantial amount of affordable housing already provided in the area. Whistler's Cove is an affordable housing rental community. In addition, Habitat for Humanity has several dwelling units already constructed or proposed to be constructed in the area. The GMP prohibits the concentration of affordable housing in one area of the County. The average density of market-rate rental apartments in Collier County is approximately 13 units/acre (see the Rental Apartment Survey), and we consider around 12 units/acre (calculated on gross acreage, inclusive of commercial portions) to be the minimum necessary to attract a developer and a high-quality design. As this project is within the Coastal High Hazard Area, discussions were held with Emergency Management regarding appropriate hurricane evacuation mitigation. Emergency Management requested that a portable generator be provided,if more than 123 dwelling units are constructed, and this commitment will be included in the implementing PUD. H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Attachment B Justification 7-31-14.docx The Subdistrict also permits the site to be developed as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. In order to provide flexibility for a mixed-use developer, but establish reasonable constraints on the total development allowed, the amount of commercial acreage and square footage is reduced in a mixed-use development scenario. The total number of trips that can be generated by that development is also capped, establishing an overriding limit on total development intensity. The proposed GMPA to create the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict is justified based upon the community's desires, the long range growth potential in this area, access to the arterial road system, and the fact that the site has been established, through the PUD process, as an appropriate location for commercial, residential, and mixed-use development. Environmental Overview See the Environmental Data Summary prepared by Passarella and Associates. Traffic/Transportation Overview See the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Services. Conclusion The request to create the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict is justified and will better serve the needs of the community than the existing permissible land uses. H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Attachment B Justification 7-31-14.docx / s • iD®®® , . ., r •' , 0, ' 3 \ "~,.e,"`v ,s , .,,.- - .., •IcS' )*"--' et, . ' ......„,, .• , • ,..,,,.. . .‘.. x•,• •,,, ' ,, . , • '''.;-..1t*1 ,s4i) .‘i'. f 40- ' - - - . } dye ..A-;,•.41, •S. •-t, ,, ,•.‘ • ,,., •.i ' ''.....I .tr:-' ,- o . . . ',.. 4. .,. ...ika 12.0;9;:,,„ . , ..—:;,..,4610144.,,,';:> � t u J .' . : ' (-,� r'4- • --I ';i ,� . �, ; 7-..--r., ' t , r o _ '• �1 '' ' ¢x .fi J�r �► 7 Z ,�', , . .+ � . �‘ o G , i . fjl N • 4 9 ,- # dry •s.\ , :4:• , ' ZLIr5X1 .').. - ,,,,,,,, ,,,,.,''..,'',,ge4c7,,r a,v fry, 4 "°+ ��, t .' �, ...ye i , 'ids �r c' \ ' ti., � ,� s i : rr / , - Ai:\ -' - ' 1 '''''.''':'',..' •• -':.'„,' .?„: 0',-. =:.', - ,,,,),,,,i. - .,•-•:, . , 1,,`.. .. . , ., ' ' .14, .. . , .,\,,, .,. .,, , • A.. • ..,...,„ ..7' $ � r r -j � e rQ .,> • to .` Z ✓ . r yy•404 ' ..i wa r)',,!! 1,• ;-• 1 D y + �Y_ g �`1 li.r r w �K ': f - __ -- , , . -..;•44,,-„,. itirs- - ':--- : --.a.,,, ‹ t ,,J. . . , - .m.aKn R• +_,.' --- --- - f e°' m w y i°i �t l v� ' ry _, s. * 4. 7 �IA''',-.11$10r4-"� I i N� � ' e''�,ill► / ,. ,� .$0" '''''''''.41111;:'414111 -741-'41.11111;11:1411161t41114'11112`'r/11,-;'*liss,‘A .-4'. ., -.-" • .2 :-/ ..,-, .-,:, , . / , , t„..2 '',.)...,tdi ..,- -.....'.7,,..,:„,,,4,,,,,„.„... H• c z ., , . , . , 4 „,.. , ,,,,.. ,... . . . ow giV,pa.. ; •'Ai. a. $..•-•rti.ilk'4/4/:,' ..,';'lli,t , ,.:".., ,...,"?.''.'.! 4/t.',/ 1 4'''' i ' 4.... 1'4 03 ‘,.i .. , . C C !. r . I 'X4 1 sy i� w,1, �� ; Y 1 't T p :1.1111$1 II:, 4-1.,:..„.4' ',;':".°. "itl,:431:10!..,...4' ; ;� � � . D C 03 C.T) ..a , !'?Y,r ti k e as �' Sbi •..3. . t'`ys kY�W .t i 3 a . ,,, . it. ,:•,,,, 1' / r ..,,,,,,,. ei. ,....,, ,, . ,, 1 , / , , 7/ . ... , ... „4” , ., _•-•P P . ''' ''''''1 ' '''',/,'' 471"''' 4 ': - ;'„<s'r-' ••,'•!-.1.,::-.,.. '''..•:',', „ , .'! - ''''''''-.: '''I': 11 - • • 1' ie, '`,4'.1.-.--.„',.-',i,..'!„"'",!r'Yi-`;', :::::,.',.,.-:;:::: :.,'••• .'• ' .' 4' ,/'i 3:;',4d,'it'././..rt ';',....'-::.,,.'-.,,4.,,,:,•,"..,,,'.::iii' / C, '"r"y `A � " `'' , ' 7,, • .7f r ,.,.•14 � .-.. ... P 6�.1y -'"''' S � ti . . . ....as. ..,.x . . A _ .. I $ CO M gi �Z I CO;'iii: H Cr) Z I-- wH o �/; z nz p! m $w 1 p- z 1 0 N o m r o w cu 1 . 4''T"-K �.a S, .c•____-,---,---,....,T-t.-rrtr.�'� �.� -ey a : .i j >:e:`�.,,}> .4.. 1 y�714 1 '` `'3�'� - g Jpi' . T i ., .. -�-.,�C: - LJ � '�s '° t x-+�'rs a $ v E.. —f M '-'''• r p ta. a r �. . # t_1"r im .-; f- i,-# 4.' 9 r-`t ka»z• ie,'-t.:# .t-<_ w'—�-` , rte. - `-fir _. r 'Si - =L +-. ' T+T�a- � ; .Ly }Yfr�z# . Y.-Z . �-:C.s� i X i sa �'{'� - �.F�c� ��- '"�"F"'"=7_ �1 �°�` �x.. -� 5�,es`+'i�ss -,:��°?r+ �4 I7" �`s+-�. .. s`-a- ° -'s••( z `� p,, . .- ...sSt S a-,�'!r G`+r §`� F1�~�y` '.a} .t .. w!' {' 5.+r-..-: ?_"{, '` L i -7 -- =,_ i i� r�}T }ti' ti 4 ♦ Y ., _ sue a f :._ r. 5• -' 'it .t=i`s - ? :r 3"YY- ..... �� 'fg '7 :_.•'. -tea a., t -,^ t C-'1 i.C, A, _ :; -sy 7.r E°e.`.e.1-j 3+`a Lr y , , y is -;r f :.t. i--7,4,--ita a_7 ' ,t ._°�3. - � F'�; Aa "w' �. -�G aX ' .,il U ite,.: r !F'. 5S ri 8 R }�'i7�.� [�+ ri' S^_1 *7 . -t tk - .i-'-S' e ` at' s-'` c�-r* t g ...-r ,..-.4.,-.=-:_-_,t' ° - 'f .- '*'- # •$, ' .i -r �° .e. 3,. t' �°;l ,,."di'�.• X24' ��s - .'f"�� 1 „ _:f J.V e ' - -- rc". t --1+ 4 .[,pr i'3S 1. _ _ ..•' yi'a `°S a� L d •i2 _ �' f�,,rf..- 3 'r t = -f,� {yy_��^'a. -, �� ° k 1 +ate" s 1 .t . Y �. i +r>ry 1i ; l Pi 1 ' k yr rT{ 'rta ; 3 z'".'_,...''__,...1 1 Et i 3Iv �v �... L t; _ 't•�♦1. i T-?'a r. ,:r,...-% n+°h . .-.�,� -4`.1 7.. ' a t '�� t r.•-.. e+ '�° f rra 7 3, _ c*--p ' .d 2.i.. E _� _`+r .r.+d'.,. '.i-i:'' .e r '. is :5,-1+.&�S = t. {:J .} -'' . R '� .{ • .. '+4, -mr,4 yn-,-,:t - x,.. -rat ..f,- V.� a ..' E,�. tt �" t .' . c ,�t € .. ,�" ,t S3, 44c. �-� ,"r�.r: e-i . r u {.. s, i &,-;,-._1:' .� FFF i ..,f' } i .- . - I'4#` ';11TkkW.:- 7 i �ilf �.. �a: l^F ' ''W''.'j ;5A''7.' r it '' - ii r `e ,,3�.yr 11 SIC-'• .F a t.- g- ? 1} .+ F- - - '" #ic r - -.-, *.. s2 � "J rs�'t T'-a -.S. ' •z*. mac ' y WI .`� � ��' + '15� � �# K a-{��y�s��c � -r 2 i` _� 1' '� -�i �► _+ �i .�Y e i s >. x'r,.`'-{r}s Rc 1� f .-P N „''ems. *ti 4 ^,& ;, ,..t t_l :,F }..ya ,? j r }L,.[, 4 ,.4", •7eit'k'.. .-t x Lrg'",1- ('! :_ , ' ' -�- ∎ _ar. r7i g ,Ti-:1� ;? .. 4- '''k- r _ E�... -„ - -iji _ �.A�,. 1 + .'�'e. t..-- s .C!r'a �r ., .,i yF7 '+J'3yt +n/ r c? tJ�._�^'e- . agar y ,+ 3 1' : i3 s r t ' •i- ,--ilf r r I,rs 3..yt 4}�, r -_ t .-�`{ # la ., x+? "7-7".-..-z t z t-*"-.�4.'.a- ca°S�Y, '. 'T'_-•t-ir 1F-f ? :J2-'.- _-cam A= •k._ F- r .a t E_ .---{ t,-�". ,7y y ? _ r �_ ' -�''`{,t- �. .` by�E °t' •[' �i I}'es s�r t -e a .} '' •� . k-f $ 4 fir .,• 4= c� F- 'Y �w r'.. -.:-.:'')...',..3`a r :a: ? t i�+ ,. t r Ri R� , rC } -.- 3ai 7 � r� .3",. - V,-= ++',-r. i'- rya 1 +r .e .. T r ""' ,. '!'rC- Q',0.' � �rjyit``�-Lr° �E s'' fi r+gs�.yfi {"'t 7--7rs�t-y 9!�- 2 r `�h -. ,.._. s��t . _ Y a^ f"1+n` °.i: 'FLV4' i i74�+ 7` N.:: '�P .F l $�{ =.-- � Y ',,-- ;--• c ar-' .- N` -,'V ^`- -14-Y Z - ,, -S , 1' .`c. q; : �- ,,t.ne j ,r� t ..'4� �'� s _-! ,.w. E ms_T rl `e l!F *2-tom?ice r ~. s s` J --- - r 1 .4 d, 1 'ys, 1 .4` i .. .?,s,c `2-. N�ic`ti. Y - "; ,_r Ps •`'-4x,. 1 . '- '`'-•. -t'se • �, iz_ - 1 - a_', . ;�` '�F •5 -"'� �� "`- „' r1::::-::- ya :�,�-.,% • a �1 1 � c t:::::� "� - ��"�#' �;:�''$ �'-,�'-- . �.._.. . _a 3�- 'a` _ s 3 'yt`__�-�'K��3 .s. 1 -- L-�'.f"'_r_.. 'y _Y-f�-t 'tEr. Vision for the „...,,,,i _ .fir>c,, " ` - EastTrail Corridor•_ ii a i J � t 5 • .t f ATTACHMENT "C" asrorr jhr die Euisf Trail Corridor • Table of Contents Introduction 1. Master Plan Study Process Context 3 History Land Use Characteris.ties Circulation Population Characteristics Neighborhoods and Housing Conditions Economic Conditions and Trends Environmental Characteristics Past Planning Efforts East Trail Visioning Process 10 • Public Involvement Applicable Planning Principles The East Trail Vision Statement 14 Goals &Strategies Attachment: Vision Concept Plan Appendix: Demographic page from Economic Development Council of Collier County's"Market Facts 2008-2009" Public Input Meeting documents t`isw .for (he.East Trail Corridor gtztroatteitiatt, Mc East Naples Foundation is a 501(e)(3) non-pro:lir.of-tani.ation that is continuing the community project initiated by the East Naples Civic Association's Strategic Flawing Cotnn ittee. This project is an endeavor to create t plan to promote planned growth for . the future of the "East Trail" (Tantiaiui Trail East i U.S. 41 ikst) corridor in Collier County. The Eat Naples Foundation envisions development along the East Trail over time according to a community lased master plan. This is trot :Ilion- the road itself. This effort is not an evaluation of how many lanes or how much asphalt should be poured on this vision "COT the future focuses OR the property, the buildings. and the features along the East Trail. These features will ultimately be developed and redeveloped in a way that either contributes to or detracts from a sense of identity, character, place and functionality for the people who live along and travel the corridor, The Study Area is a stretch of approximately 14 miles beginning at Airport Pulling Road adjacent to the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Areal to County Road 92. The Study Area covers a long distance of roadway with varied characteristics and multiple functions serving both travelers and neighbors. The functions of the corridor span the spectrum, from the northernmost portions that can serve as a "main sheet" for established communities in East Naples,to the southernmost portion that is a scenic route through the Collier-Seminole State Park and rural agricultural lands. The future character of the corridor will be dictated over the next twenty years as many currently developed sites reach the end of their structural and functional lives, and many undeveloped lands face development pressure. The East Naples Foundation identifies the need to focus the activity, growth and opportunities of the corridor in a way that best and most efficiently serve the people living, working, owning land, or doing business along the East Trail corridor. The Fast Naples Foundation has undertaken this planning effort for the following purpose: To develop a Master Plan for the U.S.41 Tamiami Trail corridor which will encourage planned growth, both commercial and residential, that is compatible with the unique natural resources of the area, resulting in an enhanced quality of life for all residents. The East Trail Conidor Study Area defined for this planning effort does encompass some property within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) boundary, however the recommendations of this Vision for the East Trail Corridor are only for lands outside of the CRA boundary. Any referenwe to property within the CPA boundary is only conceptual in nature, and is not intended to alter or vary from the CRA's Redevelopment Plan that guides and governs all future development within the CRA. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 1 April 2010 l•ilia) uJur the East Trail corridor t1 aster Pion Study Process The objective of this master planning clfort is to anticipate.icipate. pl,ui and identify adjustments to regulator) framework so that the East Trail corridor wows viably while protecting quality of lice. Current conditions have been documented and analyi.e€d. Community interests have been defined and prioritized in this Vision For the tome. This Vision will ultimately be translated into a master plan docuim nt eomplcte with goals, policie.., and implementation mechanisms that ensure sustained adherence to pi-inciples of the plan. 11w following outline provides the detailed steps of this master planning effort. Steps 1 and 2 have already been completed. this Vision document i.nifills Step 3. I. Existing Conditions inventory - Professional planners, engineers and ecologists • collected, tabulated, and mapped existing conditions along the corridor, including: corridor boundaries. land rase, zoainr=, utilities. drainauc. transportation, demographics, and design characteristics. 2. Public Workshop - A meeting was held March 30, 2009 to display collected data and solicit input from the community and stakeholders to identify the area's strengths and weaknesses,likes and dislikes, and desires for the future. 3. Vision - Professional planning consultants prioritize the goals and objectives of the community within the franrework of existing conditions and potential for the future. The vision is embodied in a statement document and an image that conveys both the concept for the development of the corridor and the illustration of the segments,gateways, nodes, opportunities and constraints along the corridor. 4. East Trail Plan - This plan document will outline the goals, objectives and policies that provide a framework for the development community and the public agencies to achieve an outcome consistent with the vision for the corridor. The East Trail Plan will provide the following: background data and analysis, and guidelines for planned transportation, land use and urban design elements. The Plan will also identify necessary improvements and recommended methods and criteria to achieve the desired results. Recommended methods may include: incentives, performance standards, form based Bodes or new development standards. 5. Public Input-A second meeting will be held with the community and stakeholders to gather input and answer questions related to the draft Corridor Plan. 6. Adoption - Collier County staff, Advisory Boards and Commissioners must review and consider the Plan for adoption. 7. Implementation - After the Plan is adopted, the implementation of the plan may involve: Growth Management Plan amendments, such as new Future Land Use designations, overlays or commercial location criteria; Land Development Code amendments, such as new zoning districts or overlays; capital improvement plan updates; new funding strategies; and new public outreach strategies or programs. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 2 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor context . t . -ti0' yf } v i .0, t At * , I ,-,..# i. ..104"1".... .x. r § ` -'Y j y; .t- l 1 r � tit.. +, :Pat 9i - i z +ria( '.?i EARLY VIEW OF TAIVIIAMI TRAIL "History of the Tamiami Trail,"Authority of the Tamiami Trail Commissioners and the County Commissioners of Dade County,Florida, 1928. History Opened in 1928, the Tamiami Trail has long provided a critical connection for the State of Florida, from Tampa to Miami. The importance of this route as a state connector has been overtaken by newer highway improvements to Interstate 75 that is now the high capacity route connecting the Fort Lauderdale area to Tampa and points north. Much of the Tamiami Trail that runs along the west coast now functions as an arterial roadway running through urban and suburban areas. Cities along the west coast have made efforts to redefine the arterial roadway to better fit their communities. These communities have found through traffic studies that the Tamiami Trail is often utilized more for local trips rather than long distance trips. This means the Trail corridor should develop with local context and character similar to a "main street" rather than a throughway in an urbanized area. Other portions of the Trail are much more scenic, where the landscape stretches for miles over agricultural lands, the Everglades, and other protected parklands. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 3 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor ( Y P y r 4 Y f 1 Intersection with Airport Road _r , .r..a jf• .i...--.',. 1 R - ; �f � � ° : t ;tit t ' z a h.r.`% c. t t 1SF 4 Y 7 i s ti. s f ' i..'::F. v�, � ei -# 1 rX.''f't ▪ f�.ai`tY}}♦�.F ! r;,.:,:-..: :4.-..' F.--if!'";- [ z (`_ ,_ A::'" r Z f r xS s,. l.i4 ' q,•.-e: 7+�..,►,c: .K ..,.,•,-.d.a�:.r... . ma .'. :'-'-4, g s � tir� .2 y i'4.� l• 3 ' 'der J 3 '� 1` t '� z ,,,� '0" Intersection with C.R. 951 IS,-,-•; .z 1:2,0,.. a #ret 4.t 1 4a j1 Fy Y � •h� � is d It•KS'V4as ' %' 'rte. t. -Y p f %, y':tf s�L-,r lY�.y xt s 4 S a z ' �y3s f A; 1"F i .3 2 __ t. s y , 4 a c � a4 - ir..-'1.-•'.f.....s, •._ 1 .._+.f 7:. s � '�, t C a� .� , 4- 1 j car. h • „, Intersection with C.R. 92- +;:?: 1' as el t t � 7.� f t _ -G Ys 'a 1:1 ` a t l ;y t a r Land Use Characteristics The development along Collier County's East Trail from Airport Road to County Road 92 is a reflection of a wide range of land uses. The Study Area defined for this East Trail Master Plan Study begins to the northwest at the intersection of Airport Road and the East Trail, where the Collier County Government Complex is located. The southeastern terminus of the Study Area is the intersection of County Road 92 and the East Trail, where the Collier-Seminole State Park begins. •Due to the geographic extent of the 14-mile stretch of the Study Area, the area has been divided into four segments, depicted on the attached Vision Concept Plan. All the segment lines do not correspond with major roadways because the segments were divided according to transitions in land use patterns. a Segment 1 is approximately 2 miles between Airport Pulling Road and Valley Stream Drive. Segment 1 includes Lake Avalon and the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Boulevard. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 4 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor • Segment 2 is approximately 22.5 miles, from Valley St}"eam Drive to Navajo Trail. Segment 2 contains mostly developed or planned residential neig lrbocheods including Sabal lay, Lely Country Club, Naples Manor, Treviso Hay, and Whistler's Uwe. • Segment 3 is approximately 3.5 miles, from Navajo Trail to Naples Reserve Ronlevarili, Segment 3 includes Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, they C.R. 951 intersection, and the new Super N.ValMart. • Segment 4 is the longest segment., measuring approximately 6 miles. from Naples Reserve Boulevard to County Road 92.. This includes Reflection Lakes, Fiddlers Creek. Six Ls Farm and Collier Seminole State Park. The corridor is characterized by the established neighborhoods of East Maples, which gradually transition to the southeast to more golf course communities and suburban and rural style development. In Segments 1 and 2 the commercial property along the East `frail was limited in size after the widening of US 41, so that much of the commercial Iand in these segments is underutilized. The corridor is bisected by the intersection at County Road 951. This intersection is an important crossroads because County Road 951 connects Naples to Marco Island going south, and connects to the [-75 interchange going north. The intersection is developing with commercial shopping centers and big box retailers. Moving to the southeast, the development along the corridor becomes more sparse, with some suburban neighborhoods and more rural and agricultural lands. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County Future Iand Use Map as eligible for a rural village. For this planning effort,the Study Area has been limited to properties along the East Trail within a half-mile distance from the centerline of the Trail. This half-mile dimension allows our study to encompass parks and schools that are in close proximity and are important to the corridor. The half-mile dimension also allows us to represent and evaluate walkability in the form of pedestrian sheds. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 5 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor E I,„,.--re,AVE k": �(,ts'� t (bus T,arrtte�5!5!»ny '- S.i -. (.\.. .wiewn c 1 lic Co mnem:0 Reidea ial Total Antis - ' 9 34S.?6 659.338 I063.03 c. % 32.81% 62 03% 100% 1 ii y I .. r ---iri-- no 70061A55013 OR RA LF_S AKE 1iwMMOCK RDA ,4,,,, 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 0.9 AMENDED•JANUARY 25.211 ! ■ itN!@e, (ORD NO.2UR-8) j11l TR-4 . Q-- ^ al...,. �..., South U.S 41 Transportation 3A �w.•s:..waeacuc.:sx�a rrra _-_.•_rc i�.:`.�Urits:.��:•.. —:1..e,�.:... Concurrency Exception Area(TCEA) k.,.•...«,r,.,-,. ` ,O. Circulation The East Trail is a significant arterial roadway that serves the East Naples community. The predominant mode of travel is by automobile, although the East Trail corridor has opportunities for alternative modes as well. The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPG) labels the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and north into the City of Naples as a "Congested Corridor." The Collier County Growth Management Plan delineates the U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) at the northwest portion of the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and north to Davis Boulevard. This designation is established pursuant to Florida law in recognition of communities who adopt strategies for Urban Infill and Urban • Redevelopment. This area of the East- Trail is granted exceptions from traffic concurrency because a variety of uses are in close proximity, and provisions for alternatives to auto-only circulation are available. Such alternatives include: bike racks, bus stops, mixed use development, and sidewalks, which are considered appropriate solutions to congested conditions. Alternative modes exist and are planned for expansion along the corridor. The Collier Area Transit service has bus routes from the northwestern extent of the Study Area to Greenway Road, and a future transit route is proposed to extend south to C.R. 92. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 6 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Sidewalks are primarily located within the East Trail right-of-way from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to Naples Manor subdivision. Pathways are proposed to extend from C.R. 951 south in the future. Bike lanes are primarily located within the corridor from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to the Rattlesnake Hammock intersection. Bike lanes are proposed extending south from C.R. 951 in the future. Population Characteristics Collier County's Comprehensive Planning Department delineates planning communities and generates population figures for each area. The planning communities that relate to the East Trail corridor are the East Naples, South Naples and Royal Fakapaim planning communities. The County's statistics project population growth from 68,724 people in 2008 to 98,876 people in 2020, constituting an increase of 30,152 residents (an increase of 44%). The figures show small growth of population in East Naples (northeastern portion of the corridor), an increase of 51% in South Naples (central portion of the corridor) and growth that nearly doubles the population in the outlying Royal Fakapalm area. POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY PLANNING COMMUNITY COLLIER COUNTY.FLORIDA COLUER COUNTY 2008 2015 2020 2008-2015 2008-2015'k PROJECTION ' PROJECTION PROJECTION g NUMERIC CHANGE %CHANGE /--. p� (� ¢-,f + G&' L.`5 t 1"€ t`#, z-- N ro b. 1:,.*: ..,,x;' 04 .' 4 s,-�. 11 ..■- l iH R VI, .eC B_A I .. #bit +� t 4 Y�`� f ..t r s 1 „ -4 $y . 1'11. � 3 i 703°(, . e , s Y41"° h.. : rt :4 - i. , . e , 0.k r x- ti .s , 1.4,11L;•.:;"4.111 :, , t :� y� r:t E r +1(1t 'I �F -;155,;1' ! '1 ' Iki from Economic Development Council of Collier County's"Market Facts 2008-2009" Source.Coder Counry Cemprehent.,e F❑nn ng Department, Re•.i:ed&'OB The 2000 Census data for Census Tracts adjacent to the East Trail corridor indicates a median household income of$39,405 for this area, which slightly exceeded the State of Florida's median household income of$38,819. Neighborhood and Housing Conditions The East Trail is a community of many neighborhoods. Older established neighborhoods are located at the northwestern portion of the corridor, proximate to many community facilities. From Rattlesnake Hammock Road and south, existing and planned large golf course communities are the predominant neighborhood type, with the exception of some established single family subdivisions including Naples Manor. Housing characteristics range from older single family structures in established neighborhoods, to newer single '� and multifamily structures in the gated and golf course communities. A cross section of the community is served, from entry level housing to luxury estates. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 7 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor South of C.R. 951, single family developments have been approved and developed along side established larger tract subdivisions that accommodate rural single family homes and some mobile homes. Fiddlers Creek is a large community permitted for residential development along an extensive section of this part of the corridor. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village. Economic Conditions and Trends After years of dramatic economic growth through the last decade, economic conditions have deteriorated for the country, the state, and particularly southwest Florida. Housing and construction were primary economic drivers for this area throughout the past decade, --.1 41'o kr ,': •n ++1?+-lcPt bnq been in ?barn decline since reaching its peak in 2005. Development projects that were approved in recent years are facing financial difficulty as homebuying lags behind market supply. With the drop in homebuying and consumer spending, the commercial development supporting residential areas along the East Trail has also suffered decline. Businesses have closed and some new commercial developments remain unoccupied. Economists indicate the outlook is a slow, steady recovery over the next several years. With the development of a new hospital on County Road 951 near Rattlesnake Hammock Road, along with the County Government Center that will endure as a major workplace, the East Trail corridor is an area that can continue to attract new residents and support new business if properly planned. Environmental Characteristics Beyond the most urban portions of the corridor, areas surrounding the East Trail are rich in environmental quality. Sugden Park and Eagle Lakes Park provide a glimpse of the natural features for the residents to enjoy in the more developed areas of the corridor. The Collier-Seminole State Park at the southeastern terminus of the corridor is a large protected natural area. South and east of the Study area are Panther Zones designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Collier County's environmental policies and standards have governed the development of subdivisions built over the past 10-15 years so that significant native vegetation is preserved and maintained in perpetuity. Such environmental regulations shall continue to be observed and followed as the corridor develops, with a focus on avoiding impacts to wetlands and critical habitat for protected species. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 8 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail corridor Past Planning efforts The Community Character Plan for Collier County ("Character Plan") was completed. in 2001. The Character Plan set forth goals and implementation steps to redefine centers of activity and quality neighborhoods throughout the County. The Character Plan identified the need to focus on building human scale settings rather than auto-oriented, single use developments. The Plan illustrated photos that were ranked as the least appealing images of Collier County according to a public image survey. As shown below, all three of the lowest ranking photos were taken in East Naples. The Character Plan also included a conceptual design study of the Naples Town Center shopping center, showing how infill development could revitalize the declining strip mall as a mixed use center of activity. The Character Plan put forth valuable planning strategies and implementation steps to promote quality design of the built environment in Collier County. Only a few of the recommendations have resulted in new policies or techniques applied in the processing of development projects. "z� > 7 � s° .o.y a Ly as #:.a Isle of Capri Road Tamiami Trail at Naples ToWvn Center The three lowest rated images from the Community Character PIan for Collier County Johnson Engineering,Inc. 9 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor a o f atcal V 9..64 Per Florida Statutes Section 163.3177 (13), local governments are encouraged to develop a community vision that provides for sustainable growth,recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural resources. The stakeholders along the East Trail corridor realize that their future must be planned according to a vision that directs growth in an orderly manner in appropriate locations. This visioning process for the East Trail incorporates public involvement and applicable planning principles to arrive at a vision concept plan and a vision statement with supporting goals and strategies to direct future development along the corridor. Public Involvement ` ::`t`:,, a Tf..I t` i,-"__�' A 6....1:....x. ....-..-. t.a1A n+s �/�4rr� ,,.,. �.: y,er r 30, 2009 to survey the priority issues of 1 - `. : _ property owners and residents along the 1 ~r .- - �-,... East Trail corridor. Property owners i r ; s . `, adjacent to the East Trail and neighborhood - 1_r 3 1;I i 1. associations adjacent to the Study Area were s `' . 1 notified of the meeting by mail, and it was .,-;,.1-:--advertised in the Collier Citizen newspaper. .- An Image Preference Survey was conducted with approximately 40 meeting attendees. _ 1 erence Survey consisted of ifI , The Image Pref 40 pictures taken both along the East Trail `' ;�--�.� and in other areas of Collier and Lee ,. ,r , Counties. Pictures ranged from rural scenic £;t views to urban hardscapes. The results of ,V,, ,. 14 11 , the Image Preference Survey revealed that , A r: - c t the most favored images were well landscaped semi urban and suburban scenes, as illustrated to the right and below. , S r ,''St Y r :t/ i` -T it.„ ,. •. ., , . .. . , •. ,, , ___r . ., , ..,, .„.„ . , . ,,,, C,-4. .;I I 11 I f ' 1 7 ,• t`: "*' yr, /. �'._ ! x . ,yt k �.,..F.. A $._-11 h .r .. 2 _ Johnson Engineering,Inc. 10 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor The images that were ranked as least favorable during the Image Survey are depicted below. These images pot tray auto-oriented uses along roadways that are characteristic of sprawl-like development. 4 _ FAWN - s • _. 1;11� , �- P a CA Meeting attendees also answered individual questionnaires about their likes, dislikes and vision for the East Trail's future. The issues most commented on by meeting attendees concerned: 1. Development types (preferences for types of businesses and communities) 2, Aesthetic issues (appearance of roadsides and buildings) 3. Traffic(safety and convenience for cars and pedestrians) Other comments received related to recreation, natural resources, community services, and public safety. For the final phase of the Public Input Meeting, attendees divided into workgroups of four to eight participants. The workgroups focused on one of the four segments of the corridor. The participants identified positives, negatives, and future goals for each segment. The results of this exercise revealed that top priorities for all groups were related to development types and aesthetics. Less noted were the other issues of connectivity,natural resources,recreation and public safety. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 11 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Applicable Planning Principles Using the available data and priorities from the perspective of stakeholders along the corridor, it is evident that a continuation of the past development patterns for twenty more years into the future will not bring about desirable results. Today's struggling commercial strip centers, disconnected neighborhoods, and automobile oriented buildings and uses are not the tools for successful community development in the future. The spread of suburban development sprawling into rural areas is a pattern the Florida Legislature has identified as a problem for communities throughout the state. As a result, Florida Statutes are designed to control growth management policy or land use changes that result in low density, single use development in the countryside that constitutes sprawl. The Transect t its. GAlatiiig 4.+I at,W1.2 ut-o, 4i.rY titl/VLLt�.ih yiGi..lvtiiu ......: •• »■._ correspond to a planning model known as the Rural-Urban Transect. A transect, in its origins (Von Humboldt 1790), is a geographical cross- section of a region used to reveal a sequence of environments. Originally, it was used to analyze natural ecologies, showing varying characteristics through different zones such as shores, wetlands, plains, and uplands. For human environments, such a cross-section can be used to identify a set of habitats that vary by their level and intensity of urban character, a continuum that ranges from rural to urban. In Transect planning, this range of environments is the basis for organizing the components of urbanism: building, lot, land use, street, and all of the other physical elements of the human habitat. -Andres[Many,et al,SmartCode&Manual (Miami: New Urban Publications,Inc.2005). The Rural-Urban Transect is a tool that helps us understand and govern the development of communities. The Rural-Urban Transect defines the segments of a community from its most intense"urban core" where the highest density and building heights exist, to the moderately dense "urban center," the less dense "general urban" transect, the more spacious "suburban" transect, the wooded and agricultural "rural" transect, and the "natural" transect consisting of unaltered landscape. In The Lexicon of the New Urbanism published by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company, land use, building types, and design standards are applied to each transect to establish human scale and sustainable development patterns appropriate for the context of each area. The East Trail currently incorporates a full range of urban to rural characteristics starting at the County Government Complex at the Airport Road intersection, extending to Collier-Seminole State Park at the County Road 92 intersection. Using the Rural-Urban Transect typology as a guide to manage future growth along the corridor, the design of a vision for the future of the East Trail takes shape. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 12 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor lr.r order- to fulfill the orderly development pattern of the Rural-Urban Transect model, the areas along the Fast Trail Corridor must be designated with appropriate Transects of Urban Center, General Urban, Suburban, Rural and Natural. Urban Core is not recommended for the East Trail corridor, because Urban Core would be typical of a city center which does not correspond to any portion of the East Trail. center, Along with the Transect designations and related development standards that would be applied to accomplish appropriate scale and style of development relative to location along the corridor. a system of centers or nodes can be designated as concentrations of activity. The Growth Management Plan already applies the principle of centers in the form of Activity Centers located at major road intersections. The Community Character Plan for Collier County sought to advance the concept of centers to be more than commercial nodes. The Character Plan suggests convenient centers should offer the following: quality experiences; diversity of uses, including retail, workplaces, housing, and community facilities; and building types that are durable and flexible to be functional as markets change. The centers should be scaled consistent with the Transect model, so that intensity and design of the center relates to the intensity and design of the surrounding area. Centers put forth in the Character Plan that would be appropriate along the East Trail corridor range in type and scale from town centers, neighborhood centers, village centers,hamlets, and rural crossroads. Mobility The third planning principle that relates to the corridor characteristics and public priorities is mobility planning. The concept of mobility has eclipsed traditional transportation planning models that focused on the automobile as the only measure of successful connection between two points. A mandate for new transportation planning methods in Florida became law in 2008 (Laws of Florida Chapter 2008-191 / House Bill 697). Florida's local governments are now required to adopt policies that discourage urban sprawl, establish energy efficient land use patterns, and develop transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. In the Quality/Level of Service Handbook the Florida Depaituient of Transportation has created level of services measures so that transit services, bicycling, and walking may be counted in addition to the traditional measure of road capacity to serve community mobility needs. This emphasis on developing in ways that reduce vehicle miles traveled results in planning for nodes that allow mobility alternatives. Rather than putting more automobile trips on the road, it is important to allow opportunities for walking, biking and riding the bus to access community facilities, workplaces, and shopping. Quarter-mile and half mile pedestrian sheds, pedestrian connectivity, and bus transit are important concepts to guide future development and redevelopment of property along the East Trail corridor. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 13 April 2010 Vision f,r the East Trail Corridor gfte . � tt To protect and enhance the quality of life for East Naples residents and business owners, property along the East Trail shall be developed and redeveloped according to orderly and cnchuing development patterns that concentrate community fatilitios and services in locations that maximize residents' convenient access so that all needs can be met within their own community. while protecting the scenic quality and natural resources of East Naples. The following goals and strategies are the result of community input and priorities for bow the East Trail should development in the future. Goal 1. Establish a frantework for orderly future development and redevelopment that emulates the Rural-Urban Transect development pattern. o Create a Vision Concept Plan as a graphic tool to show the desired development patterns along the East Trail corridor. o Establish land use and development standards that observe the range of Urban to Rural characteristics along the East Trail and promote building and site designs that provide quality environments. o The Urban Center at the northeastern portion of the corridor should be a concentration of shops, various residential unit types, offices, workplace, civic buildings, and public space in the form of plazas and parks. o General Urban areas in Segment I and Segment 2 should be primarily low to medium density residential in nature but should provide opportunities for mixed use developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping and public parks, squares and greens. o The Suburban area in Segment 3 should primarily accommodate detached single family home communities that appear landscaped and green when viewed from the road ("viewshed developments"). Parks and greenways are also appropriate. o The Rural area in Segment 4 should primarily accommodate agriculture and scattered buildings, in addition to viewshed developments and a self- sustaining planned rural village. o The Natural area is Collier Seminole State Park at the southeastern terminus of the corridor, which is to remain in its natural unaltered state with the exception of commercially designated land appropriate for a corner store at the intersection of C.R. 92. Goal 2. Establish centers that correspond to the Rural-Urban continuum to define locations where the following components of a community converge: residential, commercial, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, hike paths, and community facilities. Strategies: o Establish land use and development standards that encourage concentration and mix of uses at centers with varying intensity based on location and accessibility. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 14 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor o Town Centers are designated at the following locations: a The Collier County Government Complex Towne Center is a location where all the components of community converge. The complex is a bus transfer station and a major work center, with connectivity tivity to residential neighborhoods within a half mile radius. The aging shopping centers of Walmart and Naples Town Center are opportunities for redevelopment with more intense mixed use settings to incorporate new restaurants and shops within the half mile pedestrian shed. = The Rattlesnake Hammock Road Town Center is a location where residential, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths and community facilities converge within the half-mile pedestrian shed. The future development of Sabal Bay could result in a new school and more commercial uses, including addition of a significant workplace. The aging shopping center at the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock and the East Trail is an opportunity for redevelopment with a more intense mix of uses. if The Navajo Trail Town Center is a location where residential, bus service, pedestrian paths,bike paths, schools, and a park exist, and mixed use development is proposed on existing undeveloped and underutilized sites. o Neighborhood Centers are designated at the following locations: = The Suuden Park Neighborhood Center is a location where the park, residential neighborhoods, commercial uses, bus route, and some pedestrian facilities converge to conveniently serve the Lakewood and Avalon area residents. Due to the short lot depth of existing commercial properties along the corridor, low scale mixed use and the introduction of live-work units is proposed for the eventual redevelopment of the existing commercial properties. The Saint Andrews Boulevard Neighborhood Center is a location where a commercial center, residential areas, pedestrian facilities, the bus route, and the library converge to serve Lely residents and future residents of Treviso Bay. Mixed use redevelopment and infill development of the existing commercial center is proposed to fortify this location as a viable center of neighborhood scale services within walking and biking distance for the adjacent neighborhoods. ® The 951 Neighborhood Center is a location where commercial centers, residential communities, and the bus route converge. This location did not achieve status as a Town Center due to its location in the Suburban Transect and the limited number of community service components that are viable for this location. Eventual redevelopment of the shopping centers is envisioned as low scale, walkable, mixed use development that creates an identity for the 951 intersection that relates to the large adjacent neighborhoods of Johnson Engineering,Inc. 15 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Le ly Resort, Eagle Creek, and the other smaller residential neighborhoods in close proximity. a Village Centers are designated in the following locations: • The(Ls Village Center is designated where the 6Ls Farm currently exists. The collier County Future Land Use Map designates this large property as a receiving area eligible for development as a rural village. Therefore, a Village Center is appropriate in this location. The Village Center should serve the future rural village as well as nearby residents with minimal commercial uses and services needed for convenience. o Hamlets are designated in the following locations: • The Manatee School Harslet is a location where community facilities are concentrated at the transition between the Suburban and Rural transects. This hamlet is characterized by the existing 4.i).LE_._ •._ LC1.- F_E_'.. Vt 1Vl)1.6 a-111,4. 4RLS, WAS could be further developed as a focal point for community based activities; along with commercial uses to serve nearby residents. o Rural Crossroads are designated at the following location: • The C.R. 92 Rural Crossroads is designated for small scale commercial uses such as a corner store due to its location in the natural area of the Collier Seminole State Park. -Goal 3. Establish mobility strategies that facilitate pedestrian, bicycle, and bus transit connections between established neighborhoods, new development and redevelopment. Strategies: o Limit vehicle miles traveled by concentrating development where bus, pedestrian,and bicycle infrastructure exists or is planned. o Allow mixed use development and live-work units along with reductions in parking requirements as a mechanism to reduce vehicle miles traveled. o Require connections between new and existing development, including residential uses, commercial uses,and community facilities. o Incorporate new bus facilities in new developments. o Promote complete street design for road improvement projects, so that landscape treatments promoting pedestrian comfort, as well as pathways, bikeways and bus services, are critical components of the road design. Goat 4. Promote economic development by planning for an appropriate mix of uses and housing types to support viable new commercial, retail, restaurant, hotel, and other services. Strategies: o Analyze market characteristics and trends to identify opportunities and limitations that affect development and location of desired uses along the corridor. o Coordinate with the Economic Development Council to develop a strategy to attract new desired businesses. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 16 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor o Promote land use regulations that limit incompatible land uses and are responsive to newer trends in building and design to accommodate innovative development types. o Identify a "brand" for the East Trail corridor, and use it to promote the East Trail through marketing initiatives to attract new residents, new businesses and eco-tourism. Johnson pngincering,Inc. 17 April 2010 , .._ . _ . . .,--, 1.-. SEGMENT I ........ 4,47__ i g .„.,.., , , a i • ..*"., ,: , . .. — . .•,....._,.. 1 [SEGMENT n „,,....- -j ...s ...,-„ ,.,.ft.<1`,ISIO:,---- ---,,,"-• '-::' ',",''. 1........ i' - 114116.1ASSCOi L sr: -Allirr - , .., . . -.. . . .. ......... .. ... -” l. . . \ •s'.. \\\,..., \ .. ■;•.:P..t.SIDLEI itrt?J'7,,,,I -...'*. -... . ... ..............., ‘I• is II.'I." ,'-'' — '..'.'\ '..'''- ''. -• -- ----; -•-• - '''''',"‘ : Lc y Rat.417 . .-------. . . c., — \ --.;• , . 1. . \ I. .■ 1 , `s..\ - • . i_ ^LI- EAIS --- ILE Cr.E1F, \ N. .... \ / . \i .., -... 6 -. ,,....,..1...--...:1:.:,. „ N. N, ss..,,. Ulf:Alf 0 T4,r■FR■■ ',.. `.... *"...._ . -.... . . i LEGEND I . ' i . ' 7s,■,,,,F,,:n•fo, 1 VJEINSEEED CEA'i.ORK,EN'T ; :ACTT V NOEIER , • RE SittENTIAt I I EMSTIIIO KIS SLR v•C I. .. ......., LIVE i WORK •••• :TROOOREE)Dili' EP K. ESIINC S:LIEWA2.0 - IIII Mile" EX '' I MAI i•cs.FEmvays IIIIIIINVITUTIOU,CWK ',TRAILS:CIRFENWAYS 1.,;,-.1-,•..,‘,.E0110:1RnEt•RESMIr ••■•••••+REGMENt UNE!, 1 I ••I i i t,i'PRNItisIR ZCEEE;•• -.-----,—........-~ i t— — •ER•MARY ANC,St CONUArcr ERKY•if..•ZORES AR LOC ATF.r.Alfas4T14f.JEDKEP 51,E CE tEE-‘1 WHERE!ARNO ZONE 5 AS Ihr*C.F..tis SOUTH 4 of in(C 11,4S I ItfIllfte.lic,-It ....._...... IN--e' I w L.,..., ir z ,.., _ w I I IENT III „,..„.; . 1111.!, --,. '.. iiml. .,.. i 1 tr,..„: = SEGMENT IV -..,....:,_. ,,,.. .7.:1.:... rfroumf.crlEt -1: 0 '4'4. 'itZ.' .:'• . . CA Of •-• " " - - ..,• tht.FP4.4 1 '... ..":1It■•-.1 C' , 0 CO L .. ,... •... '•7.C.,%, ,., 7, .-,:.. • .1")4.4. 1 N,, '-'• t • t 1"------ i--__ 4 9Ali I co ....\.... ilc.Ani.41.0.0 In, — ' 1,4.. 1 ....- . , ._:- . ., dc.. c, 119* •1 4,- I .,.., k tO k'9 2 ....N., ...--...., Co }-...... F ir ---,,, akra ,,,....: ...----, I re--,1tit- DENIOGRAPHICS POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY PLANNING COMMUNITY COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA COLUER COUNTY 2008 2015 2020 2008-2015 2008-2015 PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION NUMERIC CHANGE %CHANGE - _ - , tort(sorevy 3,106 9227 13,815 6,121 197.07% ig Cypress 205 213 219 8 3.90% antral Naples 20,496 20,956 21,300 460 224% ast Naples 25,801 26,229 26,549 428 1.66% ''. olden Gate 45.101 46,295 47,159 1,194 2.65% ikitnoltal ee 25,946 38,461 47,844 12,515 48.23% arca Island 1,494 1,599 1,677 , 105 7.03% vklorth Naples 58601 61,810 64,217 3,209 5.48% oyal Fakapalm 15,533 Estates 37,270 South Naples 24,314 30,898 46,616 53,623 27,390 35,414 41,429 8,781 9,346 8,024 55.53% 25.08% 29.30% Orban Estates 39,125 _ 51,511 60,797 12,386 31.66% COLLIER COUNTY 2008 2015 2020 2008-2015 2008-2015 PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION NUMERIC CHANGE %CHANGE of Naples 23,7,04 25,635 26,700 1,931 8.15% 1 I Pf Marco Island 15,988 17,338 ' 18,332 1,350 8.44% ---... ., rglades City 648 683 709 35 5.40% ' 1 soon..COIVer County Comprehensive Planning Deparknont,Revised 008 , - . . . , .,.v, 1 r - ' • - PLANNING COMMUNITIES :; ..,„,.4,1k..?■‘. , , tVe.-; i - ' COWER COUNTY FLORIDA i i 1 --,,F-'- ----- , _ 1-North Naples 7-Royal Fakapalm - , 1 ! 2-Central Naples El-Flural Estates , I 3-Golden Gate 9-Corkscrew il-East Naples 10•tmrrrokalee •5-South Naples 11-Big Cypress tates 1-.: Es 311,1 , , . .,■ 1.LqiCZ-2' ---- if ii,,',..to,t) -,- , r Ni i ■ .• • i 1 _, \ ' \`11.:-.. atk7,1_,;.-I L-, t na. ---• ..---. 6 Economic DeN elopment Council of Collier C'ountv www,,eNap tesFlorida.com PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE E _ EASTTRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY AC . gMonday, MARCH 30, 2009 & tot Napte,3 jtundatit4L, Jilt'. About this Study Objective of this Study The East Naples Foundation, Inc., the The objective of this study is to anticipate, philanthropic arm of the East Naples Civic plan, and identify adjustments to regulatory Association (ENCA), is seeking community framework so that the East Trail corridor involvement to fund and complete a corridor study grows viably while protecting quality of life. of Tamiami Trail East (the "East Trail") from its This study will ultimately result in a plan that Airport Pulling Road intersection south to its documents the current conditions of the East rnumt., Rnerl Q7 rotor-cevrtir+n Mc. el-larks iv r ,-1 T.-.;l irinntifioe On= tAcirtry fn • tlin {.,Mi•a .4 14-Ift • to define an identity for the East Trail corridor. corridor based on community input, and The ultimate result of the study is a Corridor Plan outlines the goals, objectives and policies that that indicates existing qualities to be protected, will guide future development. target areas for development and redevelopment, and an overall vision for the future. Public Involvement The public involvement component of this study is important. Property owners along the corridor, nearby residents and business owners,and other stakeholders in the area, will have opportunities to participate in the study process. Through newsletters and two public meetings, the East Naples Foundation seeks to include and inform the community during the process. The first public workshop is scheduled for March 30, 2009 and the second will be determined based on availability of funds to continue the study effort. To support or get more information about the effort, please contact enaolesfnd(a7aol.com &at.Napeee ficusaaVoft,3 . 4915.&zlfeenafle 3EaeunatA 24.-#214 .Napeee,5 34113 EASTTRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY FIRST PUBLIC WORKSHOP MARCH 3O 2009 5:30 pm to 7;00 pm AT St PeterThe Apostle Catholic Church 5130 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Naptets, FL 34113 0E2A ifolmacdiaft, ( .e. East Trail Master Plan Study SEGMENT WORKGROUP RESULTS SEGMENT I SEGMENT 2 I SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT 4 AESTHETICS Landscaping and Open Space 4 f Architectural Design 4 Rural Character 4 Cleanliness CONNECTIVITY Existing Pathway I 1 1 4 N SERVICES O Quick Response Time 4 Cl- Proximity to Points of Interest 4 !{ 4 1 DEVELOPMENT Quantity of Commercial Space 4 New Homes 4 New Development Density 4 OTHER )) Natural Resources I i # AESTHETICS Seas of Parking Unsightly Utilities • Unsightly Buildings 4 Guardrails 4 .._ Homeless&Day Laborers 4 1 Litter 1 CONNECTIVITY Limited Connection between Destinations to Dangerous Roadways(TurnlanesfAccess) 4 4 O Segmented Sidewalks fJ DEVELOPMENT Unsightly Development(Pawn.Tattoo) ♦ 4 I t Redevelopment Obstacles 4 Limited Commercial Lot Depth 4 Strip Malls �' f Vacant Business 4 '♦ Low Income Housing + 4 High Impact Fees 4 OTHER tt Perceived Crime&Safety ..... AESTHETICS. Increased Landscape 4 Increased Open Space Increased Buffer Design Review I Review Committee 4 Update Unsightly Building Facades 4 Control Light Pollution + _ _ CONNECTIVITY _ Imprcve/Provide BlkelPedestrian • ,Connections RECREATION Increased Parks&Open Space 4 4 I G0 SERVICES ex Increased Access to Civic Uses _ ®. . DEVELOPMENT - - :.:- Increased Density 4 E 4 Increased Retail(up scale) Increased Hotels 4 4 ,Increased Botique Shops Increased Resluranls 4 Lot Assembly for Larger Retail + j Business Park + I • _OTHER _Environmental Sensitivity • Ecolourism g Meeting Places/Convention 4 Center/Amphitheater Johnson Engineering,Inc. H320080000\20087756-000-East Naples Foundation Inc.(Tamiami Trail E.Strategic Planning)\PUBLIC INPUT MEETING DOCUMENT S1East Naples Trail_Survey Anatysts.xls G taffal cfvtuadatior, inc. East Trail Master Plan Study Public Input Meeting 3/30108 individual Questionnaire Responses What do you think the East Trail What do you like along the Trail should develop/change over the What is your biggest concern and want to keep the same? next 20 years? t about the East Trail? I__ AESTHETICS"-17. - I I • AEST€ETICS!tf t I-. RESTlSENCS43 • --- 12 Landscaping!Perks/Neural Areas 13 ACpearance 3 Perception and Appearance 2 Entry S"rinsge Update old Busiwss Fronts Loss of Character 2 Light-MI Clean-op Lack of Maintenance and Reinvestment t Old Florida Character Bus Station CoIalEDTFOITF 5 - I Archlecturat Continuity/TransitionZone Bebeeere Segments I._ _ . .et CTViTV,•. I 3 Sidewalk I Ba:e Lane/Multi-use Tral Landscaping 2 Traffic Safely t ConnecW^r to the Library Establish a Design Review Cm-emir/ea 2 Sarety for Bi.m1st and Pedestrians " t Traf<_ A6 Utilities Underground J- RECREATION-B TI CRUe710$i•1 - 1 Li]htmp Ordnance . I Golf Course I 'SL cons TMrt,T .....i i . SERVICES,1 4 Improve Traffic Patterns 1 Lost Services i .. _SERVICES-i _ .- '- -'-.I Improve 051041Inlerse ens I - DEVELOPMENT-IA I a Library Traffic Lights 6 Blight and Vacant Store Fronts I Schools Reduce Feetng of Traffic Congeeiion 3 Low Inoome Housing 2 More Sidewalk Convrectlriyl P.ecreation!MrdBrse trails 2 Balanced Growth l Uncontrolled Growth I;:;'- DEVELOPMEHT-13 - I t Functional Infrastructure _ 1 Abundance of Storagetm8s Bealis 2 Environmental Enhancements I Moose Homes Euraaa Restaurant I..- BEIfVICES•2 - i - - -2 --1 French Bakery 2 Artist Center!Lforan• 2 Crime . McConnelfs Hardware I. .DEVELOPIENT-31.._. .__ I Hess 22 BUlmoSS Development Movie Theater Marketing as a Destination 0 6EUtdental Develt DIr)_ens More Restaurants rely Resort Encourage Upscale Development Treviso Bay Restaurants(local and ehaUs) Indoor!Outdoor Dum41 --- I OilESta2: _ _ t Rote) I Population dive:sky Hotel I low Populathn Prohb3 Pawn and Adult Erdertakenenl Stores RTurd-use Development - Commercial Nodes(rather than strip mails&e1rege units) 3 Reduclue of Strip Malls 3 Lent Low Income Housing 1 Parking friths Re.of Developments I Accommodate Rural Vllage Developrnerrl 4 Lint Residential Urdls Becoming Retail 2 Longer Operating Hoots for Business 1 Crime Control I Prevention I Continue the Current Plan Prbrt¢y byPeroenluge DEVELOPMENT 13 CORRIDOR PRIORITIES 14 Responses from Individual Questionnaires 56 sti% AESTHETICS •SERVICES •RECREATION •17 6% 2% 14 --_. 3 o OTHER - 34 27% 6% �` •CONNECTIVITY • \\ 5 \ 7 1 _. 14 13% O CONNECTIVITY \1 *DEVELOPMENT 13% ` *AESTHETICS OTHER 2 '.. _ _6EYEEOPME1Jr) DCONNECTIVITY .t. AB% 4 OOTHER 2 1 ' 8 6% •SERVICES *RECREATION SERVICES S 2 1 7 S% - . RECREATION I 2 0 3 2% Johnson Engineering,Inc. -- H.12 00 000 0012 00 87 7t1€000-East tlapies Foundation Inc-(Tamiami Trail E.Strategic PLrnning)L?UBLIC INPUT MEETING DOCUMEl1TS1Ea=_t Naples,Trot_Sumsy Analysts.ds EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30: 2009 Public Input Meeting St Peter the Apostle Catholic Chwch Sign In Sheet ADDRESS EMAIL d 1 - '7 ,A- 6 3 ( -!_ ,; s •__ `r t "`44_ th(r GJ*A' )v.P)(Av"`;.,s 0,11C.L.aLt(0JSt ecalt;r•50i.snt� 3 ! I 3 /440-",..i: '4` e q.;29.0 n tk en-CA ,c?d 4 CHRISTI -L� 33 e. at, tS S =��/3� e gt L 0 'j' 5 Qr -- 14 6.1-1-$ rj /a2 P'lrc-14-i4-4 i 1104-- ri45neki- a-S rcn.o.ca, 6 t'( r �7 1 Fy '�? � LEAGrw ssiv C r l r 7 f ��..- , � � Jam-- 4 .. 1 8 V. ILO," J. 1 ' 11W14""64 . o �3 (93/ r:pz,vp t " s-9 9 !`t t4- . 5 l t►. � t C '1 r i-e 5 f /-) h t S 5 Cr i t&i 10 fey--Ai ts.., ,-u•� �- l ��. t^s Sc.v LR& IAA/I 3<s , S. ; 11 wit 55,',- tti- 5\--L LI00 W tN 12 Karer1 /hrri7Oi? fl .-- / rtoS r6. 3-iI i is . tx(' cr i etra 1-hoGse -V$ , / �L EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting NAME ADDRESS EMAIL Ligo.e.41 ,,o, 62:7 14 ,./.64/2-!e, ,2/144hy /AzAkez.coo/ m c://,(e.rif; 3 3 MP tha-40-4`#----- .3A a 16 C_11-/i-LA E>- /am r '712-6 c, ALP/fob,Co,21 17 a— • 1_ r2qo u ‘(.141,904112.. 3'73 kyr/a:rev q C - Co 19 / ct--,,) q741.36)1KI,A-c3 41/41k r EcApi etrj‘ r4:44y/ br,frp-, t. .vvi 20 (41e11 OlVe4 -,449/ 3W4.1- 21 7.. it_sck Gici\2tev1/4, A. a ttitif '144 •,..1,\AQVt t-k MAC.A..(1- 1 22 -tit (1)0-45- 376- 4.2-rc& itstv G&.)2_cr.F. .c&Ce EFARTIILINe JO- / met 314( t% 23 L c."-..r"--( Iv% er- 11(6 to 42-..b6c).._ Fa, —9-- 24 43, e 25 26 27 • 28 29 Page 2 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLANE STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting St. Peter the Apo tte c thoiic Chwuh Sign In Sheet - --_NAME ADDRESS EMAIL 1 __q__Affsn c,k,C.1, ,-L_____.4Liv.` \N-3___ If2-..-1 , - --q-C34->-) \i'—`60wit, .c,°wk. 2 (A 0 O 1 TrEVAt. I k)4A r f 3 lost v --.6, 7C-tok,‘Lc...:i4- 3eio -1{ 4..4 A A," -j'2._ --+ Ceti 4 Ski IQ l ITC IC- 4 iec tiie ? &a GC { e 7 G4-6 7 ,r V i ' r C Ze - 13 7 1 -.- It k t 8 imr-r-ell 'Bonrlfss 7370 G-D Lrt 3 it/W bonnessC itAA-1l, 9. net 9 I/6.4) -/- k.,i S C. L C1-• in 9`"i. ( n)q.-,,t Ss e,E.,, JDa f ei:.(if.6k a 44y L.,,, , C �y v fh 1 a f 174 � - .ram te 1; 1 z r 11/1 c'.,5 a- -c 0./7 - 11 12 13 • EXHIBIT C-1 VINCENTIAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT • October 2013 Prepared For: Global Properties of Naples,LLC. 2614 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 615 Naples, Florida 34103 (239) 692-8397 Prepared By: Passarella&Associates,Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 Project No. 12JCS2108 TABL E O F CONTENTS ^. Page Introduction 1 Vegetation Associations and Land Uses 1 Soils 5 Jurisdictional Wetlands 7 Listed Species 7 Archaeological and Historical Resources 7 References 8 i LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Project Location Map 2 Figure 2. FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map 3 Figure 3. Soils Map 6 ii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Existing Land Use and Cover Summary 4 Table 2. Soils Listed by the NRCS 5 Table 3. SFWMD and COE Wetland Acreages by FLUCFCS Code 7 111 LIST I E ` ITS Page Exhibit A. Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map A-1 Exhibit B. Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Survey B-1 Exhibit C. Correspondence from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources C-1 iv INTRODUCTION The following information regarding site conditions and environmental considerations has been prepared for the proposed Growth Management Plan(GMP) amendment for Vincentian(Project). The 30.68± acre Project site is located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Figure 1). More specifically, it is found at the south corner of the intersection of US 41 South(Tamiami Trail East)and Southwest Boulevard. The property is bound to the northeast by US 41 and the Whistler's Cove apartment complex;to the east by the Hitching Post commercial plaza and Hitching Post mobile home park; to the south, southwest, and northwest by Trail Acres residential subdivision;and to the northwest by Southwest Boulevard and a Circle K gas station.The Project site itself is comprised mainly of forested uplands and wetlands that have been disturbed by the invasion of varying levels of exotic vegetation and an altered hydrologic regime. VEGE TATION ASSOCA T IONS AND LAND USES The Project's existing land uses include a combination of undeveloped,disturbed land and forested uplands and wetlands with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The vegetation associations for the property were delineated using December 2010 rectified color aerials (Scale: 1" = 200'); groundtruthing was conducted on February 19,2012. These delineations were classified based on the nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) Levels III and IV (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). Level IV FLUCFCS was utilized to denote disturbance and"E"codes were used to identify levels of exotic species invasion (i.e., melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa),and Brazilian pepper(Schinus terebinthifolius)).AutoCAD Map 3D 2011 software was used to determine the acreage of each mapped polygon,produce summaries,and generate the final FLUCFCS map (Figure 2 and Exhibit A). A total of seven vegetative associations and land uses(i.e.,FLUCFCS codes)were identified on the property. The dominant habitat type on the property is Pine Flatwoods,Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3), accounting for 37.2 percent of the property (11.40± acres). Exotic vegetation documented on-site includes,but is not limited to,Brazilian pepper,melaleuca,java plum (Syzygium spp.), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and wedelia (Sphagneticola trilobata) (formerly known as Wedelia trilobata). The degree of exotic infestation ranges from 50 to 100 percent cover. Table 1 summarizes the FLUCFCS acreages; a brief description of each of the FLUCFCS classifications follows the table. 1 I z . A S LL V l O O S S V -.Y etc 3.LVU O3Si:i311 N V LLN•1VN1L 1 ro V 1H/IVSSVd ZI/8/a Aila3A13A31I dVYAINOT.T.�3o�zD�oxa•I 22InJI3 N ZT/8/£ 3'd y...-,L„.3SYa AEI NMYria _ ro ' `F 9J Ilml — q p,lu E�`i ! ,- �,_ .-..c.-....,- 77,, , �,'a L t .� A -4 w.,, _ •: --_'-1-7.-.. r'P.r- °sx a [I ! \•�H8by- `e1O i r R ;l� A �� °•p �I`I > . ray ,I rs ry y t .t , . psi _A i,,-,-.'- 1.3.1.k'.-t �f bp v'a k '" � -, OJ/X- m S�-3 � i '" , -)2.0,,,,,,-m py�� til a'_r ,i5 �� pF; 'Yb�. > y '•� , i r ain • ".� `,1,J. _ \ - i,' tr {r3 ------ f+`:. -':- \ • O A•A Z './ �, 9j r �S 5 ,c. a 1a 1 ; a---W !J _ i?!2 3, O I dam:- !`&' ;� 1 ',0:1,1dUN S ty`k`a4 ¢.�.".•J _: gym.- St`t4. _ T �\a' ��n.� t.�a i{.',a70r 9 3 I O.1• r-� i' a m �'£'T_ r}-a.,� f 67 r ° t CI G 11, r t �,' a , 'a1' �.. T *' r y S O 4 `'.:''...1-,i'�T S y2�. :?X to= -.kl�_II n r - 9fi�m Rl yi "� p1r - _ o ' m 4 4 a �—ao - Eat `-- ' "+' I •mod= 1s�. !T—!, I m F_�n p m p 1 I + � c� �� ; yF - 1 .1. I/ r ` i -m. . 11 z�� II.. _ex 3LL1/NCVIj Iris. 4 ' t' Zc z � i•=.•� 1-', 1 t r+ . �� 6,21,-.7.1,...4,i cr '� O$S3M©1 l: F_ ° O1 t--;4yT�" 'i t . fi I .pR: ,� ors' �1ti - •f F'j rl ,:173::-P-'-'''1,-7,--,1;' ,�'i r� �'11 i!IYI �r.-,-- �' I�ryrn 171 ' df ! �` , 'h) 1'S —•s 1 R��.r i a rx` P�r == f' l'S1 ILl`'i�'' I EE I --_ .ti y'O'�'t "�;,,•,�'4 4 r�l -..t% :::'',= 17''„-+�'. .. ., 'U'• r4 "� _ _rn • k. �� x , Jf��L }��Y ti l `a` �''"JS 3��a�, ' d 9Z JN2I SOS d[1AI 'Z£DAS ' 'y Y a ', s 5�.� 5' •.y ,; ss s f` '! NOTLV3O 1.T:)afO2id �'$'• . ,c '>._. a1. •^-a 1 , p`14-',4,.-4.s1,/,4-4..43.h,irY •, �,� _J n 1S+ r r:.t 0'7 fl,-.6- . '"7,Y' r '. ' ..d�_ aid aP 2 ( r`� , �S , ( r h e ...,Y• � `*. .G �,- 0 _. t �, 't -go .3ra ! ..v„,„.,:,-,...„$,.;`�J +I ,r _. 1�.,' Y -.1 z _I z• U� P v -r ti ,.-t m/ ha. T � \ c r 4 i -Lx'�a,�'� it � �i t q p I� ✓- I 1 k'�� v ,,•.F•J i: , iR a t. .t, i�� , -,,'+r , rY "rj 19- 1 =- I „ .. ! ...40.°.,,,�•r.. t,s to A.. +' yl�43-'`A1 -. 11 - -▪- a0 fl . . _---e tp•�_ a -'' r-r'r- �= '1 '� + aiV- r P.d Si c?11•;' r �: 'rx ' t qtr xE *`r• �,r�. Y ,rc-d T - y` ,r hY,bif`i p''_.� S • „•"'., ^0. .b„ 4-.T...� 1.1 T .,x,-........-..1. • a,. ►-�Z a a �} a 5' p �r` rte_ Is fY }, . m( `<' Y '--� t��' v`!-f�.� .y7,-'- i�+i -L'$• M '" _ '--�'-. R..+t e,'47 , - s#.,�>�Y t i-',1.:--'1•41.1...... Z .. '• ra0,� Oc> \b ,rrf O�, i tvyr , j1 e f M4• ., , d ,fs•fi f r-. s �,_,,.,-. -.qf) b`" - .�• b �u``,y ,.:` d 3 r-N 1, .J tis�':a ✓__ - Y.�} §I _ `OG'� u- 3'5�? a ti O �. e. Y i y 1 to rti 4 ki'"� 011`11 �.5 . _- 0 i'�J1 "�5�-{ t •,f�s ( , r , ..1 �T s Z :''O7, r« ''' sue y-' as wl ibex �� si�°o a- r ',fix--�.• 1y b� � �:a .o 'a_ X� .' -bl+y irl s�,d-..� a . )1G�..% _-, " 5� �ry ;. . _O�. .F . Y om.. _f yTT 3'f •ice... e,:- - ' h?- -_c r. 3r�°� ��`�"3'.�°� a z �i•i-"-Y' } �O: � &'--n �� - .3�� '�'v �'�Gtr:tlB � �1rC�.2'J L 3a 5' s',(7„,,- S �� 'FO � ' 3i �: �F � r, a � � � ; °<t E'zcw �' -j m w Otl'He70111WVHi S3lLLe�JV -/s�•-" ° NUSSVWOHl `j r �• i -' - -k f f ra'.e 'a; '�-'. = -• , 'rte- JL �,,+ -,i°td n. ,we.,.:+ Y--. fi'g r,,' r_ r e t 'c - ' i.t ,! .- ' i P ,F! w- ,,-'% Y 114. '2 .-.. .a 47. Zr�., 1. x <.S1Fl ,..:(l4`] - 3 - p,.` J S ;, a-"5'„� t:I� ,G =F�� a - ' it f`�� - _•Y� ' L 4 r is , ;t: , o z"' 3A61,sfac—k r -7 H} � t a. rs W l �'Y-r'„gst',r , a�1 .s `" r S - .-+; 1�t.T• i-. : ,a s 36e 1 . „' : I ;A-°' pd" tw, g•"� ."1" r7%34 �° ; r T.:V :&:°2...,,..jam 7,`c _ . .a mss, t� •' i y .- - '• th.,--, ..-�i _ 'r ' j 'c tl,�a,1 _ ,•ti'i`sV e > '`-- i 1, �_� a II',_ Vi i,^` fi OH1SM3a-J� -f •t• a- ,,__ 2 ;•,�, ?s��*. s, _ '€, i�? �.t.- •.� r k� , �* o �,-• 7,--- �r�7�m p gym- p r e i/x �r6 „.f,.;_ --,..,-, 4 -.Z 4y; c4 r is 1 Qv ` - �. � ""Lr1 ecru,p m 'O t _�_ r � ti3 aX s `rs aai f -' ] riO�es`"Im "° zr s i ,; i c ar 7!R, r� - 1: Si- , . t. 'A { m a = 1 k �`Y _o,- � c . ' yam ` j y 110. -/lld3 - _iD h 1R ti3rr' V� fRr^"'1 �+� .,.-,; k�' r• a �t S r - �� ,�C S fl ,OAISSIAVa a �i 1 '-Y c �� __ , 41�' . -,4 1.7m , s On7g f •a_ dby l 11D ., �,' ' 1 1s ,� ,. r1�" ?r▪Y :•fir < m �i�, A'J c [ y �� AV131S3. ._kl . _i1 c� 2y 1; 'x '4 f '!yZf !" !D ��'y . �-;`. .a y I ?v -�t� . T,..ans. +,,u �-. , .:• 'F s r _ mr •i' ,. 3,1 -^ es.,, �0 as-c,r :9 1.."-,4tr_S'_r •: s? r < it '' ''s"+ r r !1r f` t O - >' NJ �4s4 SC:��l =r yS" �; 'F. /' ,, ,�+, 3 i; - S. 447 1 . , z1- �}�I �'v .ma , r1.2..,'.-; � 1d�''r `► fl/,,` j j ,-` ..-:Aaf1SNOVlB is -ks !+. r, �_, --:/- <; 'rte j z 4aarolopa ,•-rte \i 1 SL NA OIOVtl Al 1�x=h,, r If • -�1 • �4`.6Abt. `f;. f`--!--r; 3 .69 •d - - ` �� a ��.y C� � •- r � 1F 't ll� r 1' �] 7 Q" �s�_•s t y 5.e 3 t rf� �. -I - _ gi ..: n 3AV N HaX3 � �b..r H r.Lot;i1. •�,t•s ,u at. .'..l''-',,-'F .�.,LIaap _ ... i _G=" •� Nr__.r.� ''•��s k I;Q',��`.1•� _.o f:_�� 'j 1S3MA3NI _. ,r� NNtliw cl - h\ II rf� f � r :4);:xnoa:3NaH3Gn i-1tlod 3 dtlN - _ fA �,• �' q" V�E 1'57,3 -- ',,,�- �� I L�l`170�� l � ��, UTJtllM3� tl tltltl5 , j H3tl313 Otl3A . • 111 VAVI `I •ONtlltlo ' (��l M �� ' ` H7tl38 tlN• VO .. • • IIII irk� 1.ZLh�h Yt; AL 31tlWtlM,a \ `'Z 3l nosNar :•� .. -a 1111 Y700tlSN3d -�- - i. . J- J 4 fi a 9E3 (0.54 Ac.±) ".....„ W . SCALE:1"=200' W W GS 4159E4 W W �j (1.55 Ac.±) W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 4, W W 4, W W W 6249E4 W W W W W W .(5.72 AC.{) W V QJ n V\ W W W 4, 4, W 4, W 4, • ,[ „Ae W W W W 4, W W W W W .s W W W J, W W 4, 4, W W - g4, W W 4, W W W W v 4, W W W 4, W v W 4119E2 4119E3 W 4, v (0.14 Ac.±) W W 4159E4 W W W W W W (4.69 Ac.±) (0.75 Ac.±)W W W W v W W W W W 4. W W W W W 4, W W W W 4, W W W W 4, W !,F I�GA W .L W W W 4 W 4 4, 0 V II (0.87 Ac.±)�W W W W W 4' 4' W W W W W W 4, W 4' 4' W W 4,4119E2 W W W 4, W \ (0.03 Ac.±)4' '4 '' '4 4, W 4, W W W W 4, W 4, W W 6249E3 W W W W W W 4, 4, W 4, W W 4,(0.03,Ac±) VW W W W W W W W 4, W W W W W 4, W W 4, 4, W W W W 4, W W W W 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, W W 4, W �� W '' 6249E3 "....•"(1OA W W W (6.91 Ac.±) W W W W W 4, 4, W 4, (P I1 y 4, 4, 4, W W W 4, +�._.. W W W W W W W 4, W W W W W W W 740 E P/L W W W W 4, W W W (0.19 Ac.± W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 4, W W LEGEND: 4, W 4119E3 2 (6.16 AC.±) _1 • SFWMD AND COE WETLANDS W F g `, (12.66 Ac.t) W W p �V SURVEYED WETLAND LINE W W W W 4159E4 z R (3.10 Ac.±) f. e E NOTES: FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1'=200'AERIAL 2. PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. a • FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE,COVER AND FORMS O CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM(FLUCFCS)(FDOT 1999). FLUCFCS %OF UPLAND/WETLAND LINES WERE APPROVED BY SFWMD CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL _ ON MAY 17,2012 AND BY THE COE ON JULY 18,2012. 4119 E2- PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(25-49%EXOTICS) 0.17Ac.± 0.6% ▪ WETLAND LINES PER MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 11.40 Ac.± 37.2% DRAWING No.E-005 12-075 ENV LOC VINC.owo DATED 4159 E3 PINE,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 0.86 Ac.± 2.8% T. JULY 18,2012 4159 E4 PINE,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.40 Ac.± 17.6% z 6249 E3 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 6.94Ac.± 22.6% • PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER MARCO SURVEYING 8. 6249 E4 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.72 Ac.± 18.6% MAPPING LLC. DRAWING No. P092-VINCENTIAN-PUD_V4. 740 DISTURBED LAND 0.19 Ac.± 0.6% DWG DATED MARCH 19,2012. • TOTAL 30.68 Ac.± 100.0% /,...,\. DRAWN BY DATE H.H. 7/19/12 FIGURE 2.FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP REVIEWED BY DATE PASSARELLA VINCENTIAN REVISED 7/19/12 p & ASSOCIATES z 3 Table 1. Existing Land Use and Cover Summary FLUCFCS 1.escription Acreage Percent Code of Total 4119 E2 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed(25-49%Exotics) 0.17 0.6 4119 E3 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) 11.40 37.2 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) 0.86 2.8 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed(76-100%Exotics) 5.40 17.6 6249 E3 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6.94 22.6 (50-75%Exotics) 6249 E4 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 5.72 18.6 (76-100%Exotics) 740 Disturbed Land 0.19 0.6 Totals 30.68 100.0 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed(25-49%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2) This upland habitat occupies 0.17+acre or 0.6 percent of the Project site.The canopy is dominated by slash pine(Pinus elliottii)and also contains melaleuca, earleaf acacia,and widely scattered java plum. The sub-canopy contains scattered slash pine, Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto(Serenoa repens)and also contains wedelia,broomsedge(Andropogon virginicus),muscadine grape(Vitis rotundifolia),poison ivy(Toxicodendron radicans),bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), and earleaf acacia. Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3) This upland habitat occupies 11.40+ acres or 37.2 percent of the Project site. This community is similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2;however,the canopy and sub-canopy consist of 50 to 75 percent Brazilian pepper,melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. Pine, Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3) This upland habitat occupies 0.86+acre or 2.8 percent of the Project site.The canopy is dominated by slash pine and also contains melaleuca,earleaf acacia,and widely scattered java plum.The sub- canopy contains scattered slash pine, Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm, melaleuca, earleaf acacia, myrsine(Rapaneapunctata),and wax myrtle.The ground cover is mostly open with widely scattered saw palmetto, cabbage palm, muscadine grape, poison ivy, bracken fern, wedelia, St. Augustine grass, and earleaf acacia. Pine, Disturbed(76-100%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E4) This upland habitat occupies 5.40+ acres or 17.6 percent of the Project site. This community is similar to FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3;however,the canopy and sub-canopy consist of 50 to 75 percent Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. 4 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm,Disturbed(50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3) This wetland habitat occupies 6.94+ acres or 22.6 percent of the Project site. The canopy in this wetland community is dominated by equal amounts of slash pine and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and also contains melaleuca and earleaf acacia. The sub-canopy consists of slash pine, bald cypress,melaleuca,earleaf acacia,wax myrtle,Brazilian pepper,and cabbage palm.The ground cover includes swamp fern(Blechnum serrulatum), climbing hempvine (Mikania scandens), rush fuirena(Fuirena scirpoidea),wiregrass(Aristida stricta),sawgrass(Cladiumjamaicense),yellow- eyed grass(Xyris sp.),gulfdune paspalum(Paspalum monostachyum),Asiatic pennywort(Centella asiatica), and horned beaksedge(Rhynchospora inundata). Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed(76-100%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E4) This wetland habitat occupies 5.72+ acres or 18.6 percent of the Project site. This community is similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3;however,the canopy and sub-canopy consist of 50 to 75 percent Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. Disturbed Land(FLUCFCS Code 740) This upland land use runs along the southeastern boundary property. It occupies 0.19+acre or 0.6 percent of the Project site. The canopy and sub-canopy are open. The ground cover is a mixture of species common to disturbed areas including wedelia,Mexican clover(Richardia sp.),muscadine grape, and lovevine (Cassytha filiformis). SOILS The soils for the property,per the Natural Resource Conservation Service(NRCS)(formerly the Soil Conservation Service), are shown on Figure 3 and listed in Table 2. The "Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook" (Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists 1995) lists Holopaw Fine Sand (No. 27) as a hydric soil. Immokalee Fine Sand (No. 7); Urban Land (No. 32) and Urban Land— Immokalee-Oldsmar, Limestone Substratum, Complex(No. 34) are listed as non-hydric soils. Table 2. Soils Listed by the ICS Mapping Unit Description Hydric/Non-Hydric* 7 Immokalee Fine Sand No 27 Holopaw Fine Sand Yes 32 Urban Land No 34 Urban Land—Immokalee-Oldsmar, Limestone No Substratum, Complex *Per.the"Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook"(Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists 1995). 5 7 �(� 9 (zl S IV 10OSS ty J sJitA�� 31Va a3SL•\9!1 'j'( c c�/�T "(��'°_°°3 ZI/OZ/£ 'g'g I�i�I LI�I��NIA V1 1 EE�VJ rJ V i atva caaaA>3t��t C� ��.5 '£�2�f1�I3 l ZI/OZ/£ 'H'H .LVa Aa NA1Ylla — /....../........'0661 30IA213S NOI1VA213SNO3 - . S3321f10S3211VNf11VN 3H1 A8 031V3213 OW LOOZ ;aaA 213130D0 311383M AdV8811 VIVO 3IHdV219039 0 V01210-1A 3H1 WOW 03211110JV SVM 9NIddVW SlIOS 009 09Z '311S83M A21V11BI1 VIVO JIHdV219039 VGI2101d i 3H1 W021A 03211l0JV 3213M S)I210M13N AVMCV021 ----°--•-•^• .- �I210AH 'ZIOZ'61 HOUVW 031V0 omo-VA-and -- -NVI1N33N1A-Z6Od•ON 9NIMV210'311 9NIddVW 9 ON X3ldWOJ'Wf11tltl1S8f1S3NO1S3Wll'kfo'WSOlO-331V)IOWWI-ONb'1 NV81if1 P NVIIN33NIA -a ri 9NIA3AWS OJdVW 213d A VONf108 A1213d021d ON ON Ntl821f1 Li n S3A ONVS3NIdMVdOIOH LZ GN3J3l 3 '0102 2138W3J30 d0 31V01H911d V H11M 3JIddO ON OMdS 3NId 33ltlNOWWI L 5,21351V21ddtl A1213d021d AlNf100 2131110]3H1 onpAH uo0duosap 11u�pog H9f1021H1 03N10O3V 3213M SHdV219010Hd 1V1213V F. :S310N iir kii.....;./ ,--....--.5-1,-e--„-,,-?..--4.--Ai., ig.J ..- .--147 .--.-- -.-,..-----,-.. .. .1/6--soit :,,,/ E • , .1' -'.!, .- -,11 j•t• 1:0:-.,-. .7.N4,;▪(, ,,,,illf,,, 7.... t � v r>X1 a K 'a e n r- s laO rl• g. •.... ..,x, ..„ • �5 . 9''''' _4 �¢' �' .i5 '�'-er l!si.' .i _ {o _,..A..�l� - .y. 7� t.�W� '�'�&•I `a -{L-4 . 1t a.` q 'r ` � -' 1 'r• l" a .�' a-- --r. '-■?'13%.1. ' •-•--• ''''4i,1, .7' r •S_, UC,,t K7y_. :t43-4...-..-„,,Tu I'�c°1-" it:'-..'iR(.`.�?„ " Ll'lie' ../..{s.` -'— ' �' ` `!3 'rFjsE,i�fg �!f;_"^�'sfi`- r ~Y � a ; ` ed- L3 y�-` � • °.J� �., �"s 7.."'" F i A` M_�'�. 'E. a''•. d tai - - .p -t g • i . `fit .�i • y.I_t. • *. � _ zip � ,� !'s+�, �5�'� 1- .1.47-44,(„c;G � 4;i T 1�' r�'hr*,C � x t•.. 3'�'' _ y�yt �S'i`_ s4 ar - -?+Y P . is i x F2.- � F f-' , Y' lit:, • �.. �j �y.� }, i / '' j , !i� 'r,+ t<� `'it'3 b4??: �=F 5 q i TZ � 1 F t ' �.-:Asisio, __ fd • ..,. ., s 7 -. , ,,,,,-, ,;i• _' .z_..,.q '�' �'i.* .4. � ti--x lr -7E57' } r ter - F ., ..., ¢.`' -q' .� �� . T ��.1~'-i a4 cy A J ° "`- i .6. .5••'tt.-'-� ', . �, g . yam. nia- :.� 3. u•' F 1',' I uri '` ltk k� 'J*-1...t.- r P l I iir�Y :x7 'l -,0 .1t,,„ >>L 6`T _•,c• f`m /` - �' f J -. .,�,p• �,-'ri. `� '-•r'.yt'> p �-, � y.jr,Sl { - �,y� sr _ ~�" „ t,,�, ��;gp � ,A�e y- �°" q,a' AIL 'i `'►� �1- T° - �`'•as 1 y ',6?t -4 ,s{, -1'#F' i '"?%.. 1 � ▪rr • t4 v _ s, •''f P - - J -;Ii -T s >-s gSt t ^ .4y1 i3�l'y } "� a '�� @N rte -'F'F K Y'c^�.' �t•#� �4�� i temµ▪ - '- yr �i"1." '.� 1 ' 4l°� ' • *- ♦1 -..'-'1', .!. ; i..•a ';pdt �'.32 :tKr'_ '_�c.W t• - .T�.' pa l� -i • _ _ ', ,'�'.. 3 •+r i°'"' P'S =-r'l yN ▪"1 H.`,'' c, ,.._, -a i-; -._ !t _. .t, _ 'S. - Ly�i�. �' - ,�.• Y 1 57 V �, i is a�x e- /, - ' �u) 'ft� IIxJ`, ry'T� '' ', '�, � .�E .� .ice •� ^x.' ,�,s-'z?'a` LJ� - ' •�.Y. t ,F� �, ; `,',Ity . -n 3f°tAV ��"pI�''y;,;a '4 C;�" y S 3A'"' ,'7.,,'"-. +f. ':',• ?r X e - b.�, •A. \ M?Y r:•-•;•„,,#.- � 1� �iF+��{ Fle `Y .#, I f c;t, •,.:' •s q ' �'` `3; * ,L ,+',�}i�a'3{ Y"`' s.` N011fl�O� x �yr� ; wg 51. .x,t-V. . * ''y' ,iii '' . �' ` -' I ;''. 10�f O ld , d, - .. l° it2i .""".' :-, •I % ,r- - ih'i ,Oe'” :•.... - , ..,4„./I' .,&i0Ceti":,..." • i . - Iii ale 1a,1�s.a31 i 1 t,. , _ 1S JUIIISDICTIONAL WETLANDS The subject property was reviewed for both state and federal wetland jurisdiction using the "Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters" (Chapter 62-340, Florida Administrative Code) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Wetland Delineation Manual (COE 1987). The Project site contains 12.661 acres of South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)and COE jurisdictional wetlands (Figure 2 and Exhibit A). The jurisdictional wetlands identified by FLUCFCS code include approximately 6.94 acres of Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed(50- 75%Exotics)(FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3)and 5.72±acres of Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm,Disturbed (76-100%Exotics)(FLUCFCS Code 6249 E4). The estimated SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands for the property are shown in Figure 2 and Exhibit A.The jurisdictional wetlands by FLUCFCS code are summarized in Table 3. SFWMD Permit No. 11-03454-P was issued for the property on June 3,2013 and COE Permit No. SAJ-2013-01268 was issued on June 24, 2013. Table 3. SFWMD and COE Wetland Acreages by FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage 6249 E3 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) 6.94 6249 E4 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) 5.72 Total 12.66 LISTED SPECIES A listed plant and wildlife species survey was conducted by Passarella& Associates, Inc. on the Project site on April 7, 1998 and March 6,2012. Additional observations were made on February 19 and 24, 2012 during vegetation mapping and other fieldwork. No listed wildlife species were observed during the listed species surveys or other work conducted on the Project site. The survey methodology and results are provided as Exhibit B. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES Correspondence was received from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources on May 18, 1998 which stated that no significant archaeological or historical sites were known to be present within or near the Project area. A copy of this correspondence is included as Exhibit C. 7 REFERENCES Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists. 1995. Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Second Edition. Victor W. Carlisle, Ed. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Fothis Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. • 8 EXHIBIT A AERIAL WITH FLUCITCS AND WETLANDS Tv AP \V*- ik •�- . 1 /•'t, .ati;.� V•^.-1...� s� �' 4U9E3 • t' i.' ,N " ' !i;- ..._ •- •../: ,. ?' - .-,..4 ., .,, ,, (0.54 Ac..±) ` •, E.1 00 f i, w w 7 `r t y 4(59E4 w , w .. .w * x ,• .,•e. . .• 11�5 Ac+) , ... • ., ,• __...7 ... i �. •W: w ''4., ••...wr ,6249E4, w ,,+.tip k N r f w r.,.-.(5:72 AF'tf 4 5 N-. _ X\ • ,,, s'• - - y-. w `.'• .w t'' • 4,-;- * w 2. v' • w '• `t •7 ' -• w•-. 'a .4 . '4 s 9 w y Al 'N-•4119E3 w , )_ . , Y r(0:14 AC.+,) • w w•w * w, 59E4 ,. - (4.69 AC.3)' - • - - y '- w w W_ w ,, .ti .)'k • s Ott w `• • - 4I5 9%i ( )` y W ). w W w ig 4 v+� J ,' . -•- - ` ,arW,,, > r` ;; . . . v 49E2 _ ' �. - 4 w ►' w '003 Ac.4) W * t * •• __ r . t - > : ' : y , `. y : w ., . y ' f 6249E3 W W W W w' W w w . w' . .v• • : • f (0.03 1AC.f) . r. k, t � ♦ F ` W•r w w w w 4. • r _ .t.I ilk E ` J - \ r. -` w y w W W W w W w w 4. 4', 40., _w J . ' i'1`�- , r c) ''- •• '`, 4, .a .. - ((�` � I V b249E3 ~ So 2`. �?: . ' -V -(6:9(AE±) J J"' . W • y w w w •v .•'' .•„ `"" 9 = ` e- • r` i• rY`.i rc' •-.. y4. ,..4 `G -, : _ - .' w w W •`Y� J Vj `�' 740• Ry4� j .� *4 ;�.•. -q 7,� , w Y w o w yw ,p . S .r w .l' w J. . ." a -,' mot' 4q,y - .�• A� - -1 r 1 . 'Y •Y `y W W w Jr W s t W _ - . .7 - ti , , W WF ,•Jn w ..• w 4 ?- tai a . R LEGEND: .,,w w w , (6. t) - r+ 16 SFWMD AND COE WETLANDS {; w w ,. . ,, '.-' •+'• r kk I- ' (12.66 Ac.t) -• �' Y SURVEYED WETLAND LINE 1'17- '" * _ 4159E4 .. } r• ' ? Q e k •�- (3 10 At.±) Zq,— ' NOTES: y ( - }.• AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH �!� _ THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S , •. -* - ., �_ ,� 11■OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF JANUARY 2012. yi +' `, ,it /1111 �� tii.'' /c r-• 1 I a FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM I'=200'AERIAL .- , - ` it j' L - ��, A - 4 PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. - - —F Li FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE,COVER AND FORMS FLUCFCS % CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM(FLUCFCS)(FDOT 1999). CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL LL UPLAND/WETLAND LINES WERE APPROVED BY SFWMD 4119E2 PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(25-49%EXOTICS) 0.17Ac.± 0.6% 1 ON MAY 17,2012 AND BY THE COE ON JULY 18,2012. 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 11.40Ac.± 37.2% 4159 E3 PINE,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 0.86Ac.± 2.8% WETLAND LINES PER MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING 4159 E4 PINE,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.40 Ac.± 17.6% DRAWING No.E-005 12-075 ENV LOC VINC.DWS DATED 6249 E3 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.± 22.6% JULY 18,2012 6249 E4 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.72 Ac.± 18.6% ,I.,.. 'ROPERTY BOUNDARY PER MARCO SURVEYING& 740 DISTURBED LAND 0.19Ac.± 0,6% 'PING LLC.DRAWING No.P092-VINCENTIAN-PUD_V4. TOTAL 30.68 Ac.± 100.0% DATED MARCH 19,2012. DRAWN BY DATE H.H. 7/19/12 PAS SARELLA EXHIBIT-A.AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP REVIEWED BY DATE 1E B.B. 7/19/12 "I> & ASSOCIATES V. VINCENTIAN REVISED DATE r- EXHIBIT B LISTED PLANT AND WILDIFE SPECIES SURVEY VINCENTIAN LISTS 1 SPECIES SURVEY April 24,2012 INTRODUCTFI)N This report documents the results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) on March 6, 2012 for Vincentian (Project). The Project includes a proposed commercial development with associated infrastructure and stormwater management system. The purpose of the survey was to review the Project area for plant and wildlife species listed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, species of special concern, or commercially exploited. The survey is also intended to be consistent with the environmental data submittal and protected plant requirements as outlined in Sections 10.02.02.A.3.b and 3.04.03, respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). Vincentian is 30.68± acres and is located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County(Figure 1). More specifically, it is located in a densely urban area at the southeast corner of the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and US 41 (a.k.a. Tamiami Trail East). The Project is bound to the northeast by US 41 and the Whistler's Cove apartment complex, to the east by the Hitching Post plaza and Hitching Post mobile home park, to the south by residential development, and to the west and northwest by residential development and a BP gas station, respectively. The Project site is comprised of disturbed, forested uplands and wetlands with varying levels of exotic vegetation. The results of the March 6, 2012 survey found no listed wildlife species on-site. This result is also consistent with a prior wildlife survey conducted by PAI on April 7, 1998, as part of the initial review process for the property. Two Collier County listed "Less Rare Plants," inflated wild-pine (Tillandsia balbisiana) and stiff-leaved wild-pine (T. fasiculata) were observed scattered throughout the site during the 2012 survey. Further details regarding the more recent survey's methodology and results are as follows: METHODOLOGY AND DISCUSSION The listed plant and wildlife species survey included an on-site review, conducted on March 6, 2012, and subsequent literature search for local, state, and federal listed species. The results of the on-site review found no listed wildlife species or their signs (i.e., tracks, burrows, scat, calls, etc.). The literature search also found no documented occurrences for listed wildlife species on the property and the Project is not located within designated habitat areas for any listed wildlife species. Further details regarding the literature search results and survey methodology are as follows: B-1 The literature search involved an examination of available information on protected species in the Project's geographical region. The literature sources reviewed included the FWCC Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (2011); Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991); USFWS Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) in the Southeast Region (1987); the Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan (Logan et al. 1993); the Landscape Conservation Strategy Map (Kautz et al. 2006); and the USFWS and/or the FWCC databases for telemetry locations of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), bald eagle, red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCW), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), and wading bird rookeries, such as the wood stork (Mycteria americana), in Collier County. The results of the literature search found no documented occurrences of listed wildlife species on-site (Figure 2). The wildlife agencies' database information is updated on a periodic basis and it is current through different dates, depending on the species. The FWCC information is current through the noted dates for the four following species: Florida panther telemetry—June 2011; bald eagle nest locations — October 2011; black bear telemetry—December 2007; and RCW locations—August 2011. The USFWS information for the Florida scrub jay is current to September 2006. As previously noted, the results of the literature search found no documented occurrences of listed wildlife species on-site (Figure 2). The closest documented bald eagle nest is CO-010 which is located approximately 1.7 miles to the northwest of the site. The nest distance is beyond the USFWS and the FWCC recommended 660-foot buffer protection zone for active and alternate bald eagle nests. The bald eagle is not a listed species, but is protected under the Golden and Bald Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. No RCW colonies or cavity trees have been documented within the Project area,per the FWCC's database (Figure 2). The closest noted RCW colony is located approximately 1.9 miles northeast of the Project site. This location, along with the others documented west of County Road (CR) 951 (a.k.a. Collier Boulevard), are considered relic or historic locations, as there are no currently known active cavity trees west of Collier Boulevard, based on PAI's survey experience in this region over the last 16 years. The USFWS considers suitable habitat for RCW to include any forested community with pines in the canopy that encompasses more than 10.0+ acres (i.e., includes both on- and off-site). Although the Project area does have canopy pine trees, no cavities were noted during the survey and no sightings were documented in the area. The RCW is a state and federally listed endangered species. The FWCC database contains no documented Florida black bear radio-telemetry locations on- site or within a 1.5 mile radius of the Project area (Figure 2). The site's relatively small size and densely urban surroundings do not lend it support as suitable habitat for this species. The Florida black bear is a state listed threatened species, but is currently under study for delisting by the FWCC (Barco 2011). No Florida panther telemetry is located on-site (Figure 2). One historical telemetry point was recorded within one-half mile of the Project area. The historical telemetry was from Texas Cougar 101 and was recorded in May 1995. Since that date, no panther telemetry points have B-2 been recorded within one-half mile of the Project site. The property does not occur within the Florida Panther Zones (Kautz et al. 2006) and/or Focus Area (FA) (Figure 3). The Florida panther is a state and federally listed endangered species. The literature search confirmed that the Project is not located within the 30 kilometer (18.6 miles) Core Foraging Area(CFA) of any documented wood stork rookeries (Figure 4). The site's mixed slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) community would provide some suitable foraging habitat for the wood stork; however, the heavy invasion by exotic species, such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquinervia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and java plum (Syzygium cumini) in the canopy and sub-canopy strata make it difficult for the birds to access and utilize. As a result, the property's foraging potential is rather poor. The wood stork is a state and federally listed endangered species. Per Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03 (Requirements for Protected Plants), two listed "Less Rare Plants" were observed scattered throughout the property. They included the inflated and stiff-leaved wild pines. Two other listed"Less Rare Plants" which are likely to occur on-site,but were not observed include the giant wild-pine (T utriculata) and butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis). Although these plants are protected at the state and local levels of government, they are rather ubiquitous to Southwest Florida. If these plant species are not already located within the future designated, retained, native vegetation preserve, then they will be relocated to the preserve,per the requirements of the LDC. The March 6, 2012 field survey methodology consisted of qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects across the property (Figure 5). The transects were generally walked approximately 100 feet apart depending on habitat type and visibility. The weather during the survey was sunny, with clear skies, light wind, and temperatures ranging from the low to mid 80's. The survey began around 9:30 a.m. and ended approximately at 12:00 p.m. RESULTS The results of the March 6, 2012 survey found no listed wildlife species on-site. With the exception of one historical panther telemetry point, the literature search of the wildlife agencies' databases found no documented occurrences for listed species within the Project area or immediate vicinity. The Project site is not located within the designated zones or FA for the Florida panther. It is not located within the CFA of any wood stork colonies and is not located in the vicinity of any active RCW colonies or bald eagle nests. Two of Collier County's listed "Less Rare Plants"were observed on-site. These and any others, if encountered, will be relocated to the future designated retained native vegetation area,per the requirements of the LDC. B-3 REFERENCES Barco, K. 2011. FWCC Chairman's column: Florida black bear....a conservation success story. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. FWCC. 2011. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. Official Lists, Bureau of Non- Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation)for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume. 130, Issue 1, rages 118-133 Logan, Todd,Andrew C. Eller,Jr.,Ross Morrell,Donna Ruffner, and Jim Sewell. 1993. Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan South Florida Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee,Florida. USFWS. 1987. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region. B-4 > �� , L --._. `—•--- P AL'L'PHAgSE SIACKSOdVILLE 11,4 Vi.'.� .. � PANAAIAICITY -dl. ilti�l�lllf 4 GAINESVIVLE ro - DAYTONABEACN .....- ... .=-......----..1 � 1F .gLANDO II'lll I , �® sue- !:�_ I Ohl TAMPA < ` . VEflO BEACH• \ SARASOTA LAKE PLACD Lik i N 1.,.,...=. N Fog'rk C. *�'i . NAP FORT-LAUDERDALE Gulf - 'al ,al,' s 8t 1�r I� iArnl of Mexico ONflO� I s .:. y i)1 a KEY WEST FD a"� { E j 8'. r6-0;j[a 4 •ae .- ,�� EXITS` . a �t ` S a s: _,. S1c i �" t Y I il'F Ply, •a . Ni ? i';1 t.,:haEXiN.N AVE y r Zr-342.1.4g'--.,P,' I",t� N 1 Or- 1o1I` y _ �. .E. $&,-.,,N4:',.„."..'._ ...e.-sl $ya ,x'717 "r ILI rT'� 1 YSL f J - 1A I - ' +'�f -} i{' ' 1 ' �Z -- 4+3\-' I '17.,:i spa.+, . 4'' et 'V FI 1 . ! .Ve? JCS \� i rd"r.'.. ! 1 >'t�3 r 0-;J r 1,z.,.. # sC'^ a S, !MOM "'N \ c1' '7i y t..1-,":.5.- .�..:, mow; _l � �I�.RADIOJRD •�'- = =p O-�` E � BECK BLVD 75 _ @LAQK@.t1RN R ��,, ,IJ< -c't- ",S1 '�I m._ , J l i 5 l if cJ O �W . _,, t y" '`• _k-'- rrl � Ir.�,y •r•' [b'F_•''a ��Y a' [�'-"- I @F�4�rr_3 et�'- J IJ • r;Wi� jj '� 4'F sn sit f rn r p "F'� -. �,.� N. . Lr ,(• v +Ne i y427, m -n f .c• z. Si .--' f .�-?ar �...•-e' ` - ,-‘ "-k•4''''.... ,:: .i .. I_�_ ,;� ESTER AV i �F�9�- � � ¢� �! •�OGK'g '' r�S ;� r ` tiL ;i " [ vl- a>'� ' 33-t 11, Q .Lr Z f S• t.VO .,_, ml ; l �= z �z ,:�_: "• 4..,---,:f,.-,L--- -•° , DAVISS .4,4. m 4 ri.1 ' �'[ s '+ , 'ti z y 11 ix�D' ,:Jsar d � P - � ,+ �1 HERIT� r -+ :-.--,s0,,,, 4:, '�•,, 3 r 11`.F 2_++ « ��.}}� DR C -'�$2 e,.{ r. t.T -, tr„ fl `, 1•'� ��rIQ' 9 •l � f l� Tl . 1 �~ ,i- Y�•�y ' -_ T _ ;• d_ � � �3� [ '' r3\ � '=-...--;:''- CSC,W i F'7'• ¢ - { Rf 1 ♦a_ t. _ "s-o i III 4 ' a ..:.::=. ,. T�qI�T� '�" ,r E,l3�m ,t CG�er¢P I O'to-�' -11C'u; r,' s e'.-r 4 ID .- I i i�Z, y` '^c-•'y• -1.-..;..., ;- :=-'�i.+J1..{(4 �6 `_ '` •-� - - Cif'"` Wi �i— �;l. 9,.,. 6 E' y2. -_ YØ :i _ ` r • -r. �} a� 3 i Y fZ W ,--¢� �a�� 'C -I 40- -.4.,,,? ' t+ ay�-� _ .a--z 4� t�-., ew afi- y�'.g.-tl1 �s��, r'~J7l/ a��i▪ Y" r LF [ �r�g d� �' � _ c't• --� #4 'y�.a,� ! ,�' {Y� � -A. :, lh.�'1C �i.lC- It .. � � Zl' f' 'y.Al�'� t�' '-- .144 �r_ ', a •' f.tfiriti 6- Sa,,r&vr li}d g. �- a I Y vm . s . E 3 /-'l,p A1(1 AY. C 5 r L i- ? r ic '1a' 3 r , ':,-- "w#rr• 4x'� 1 5+ �.��i� .. yL`,� ..`:,j t_ ti a a ]� j`.'#F- :r.. P C e J1 0. N�`.! nq�'.iv °-� i _ �..D 'a- 1�X )r,. Ca . �4 i_ "I �TITA!E@N•KE HAMMUC RDA ¢I +O F fir'j a t '1`- '-.)ate'= :s �t i �_ h•/ i_ .M1,7 , rF a u C1 �_ ¢•F,ay y_ 4 'i ;� --�,�� } a - :ifc 4.4. 1• .3 rnl_ ar a - -tax- ,j v_ 4 - t -?17.0 _O 9 C7' .' -; T'� .�- r3- ' q „1 :n_, a •--324-110¢i 1 A9AL't1P LM RD ' ` .. '-‘r/07:0"4" r- ' '-:',15"--'7'': '�(0; Re 1�i9 Gz. 4t ;;t0Q -ue ' '114 f,'i - 5_ . �,, :'►1.":',3-- -aF ` ! •3 .9i i�`p' 9 ` `Y3 FCr�o-""ti I 19F '^ '5.17.37 " F° e- ra..}i' ` itlk,., t•. }.• - y r j1:34; f•� ,h 09 ` L�4',_.`-V- . _� ' W . I.4:,'“. - Y-",,-7 - ue ' - 3,_, i 11' `'�;• w 15 - u= �' a? i`• 19 s 0r a91 b.� ¢ '�" r ,ri iT-, ,-.Q.--,,:_ r • s- ,' rT',i( 60 'y r.L, r,Ne' '� ,'do �� i ,J �'�! 1 -' ,, ,,,... 1`I } .. A ; � {. O'a •r"-'1'11.`1,)Q, x to d1. fr-.* --s 7 ..' - N` -'- 4 ,).Rr'A `'`�-r ., �'_ y��y � ±f ^S ,.3 `v is ";.1 - ti 3c '�4�r Y' [` Tj a. 11 W f /3 `-•- _ -.I.:4'r-I'� i • _ '-.-p0 1r... a r`�',t ' : -- `J4'. . _` - p__v '^."''�V,,I ' }Aoti. `.- i ...„4,.:.,...., ......,.., ...47"s_ .." i :e,� ' $ E al{? i PROJECT LOCATION I ! ti z `' r. .�i; _� } 1 ,..ate r s ! _ja-. ja .� — _ _ ry SEC 32,TWI'S0S,RNG26E M IC ST #� aI ,;, F• a L r * t L" 4 '''.sue � qi r � `, r . : .- ��a ¢ rat w� Sri °�.'�` F '�. -�., y =1�; •••••1•••;,21,-- x : 'ry a . T1 ` i,1 II d 47.--' fI '-Y.•f fi . -. , , 3 - a ;`4 e 1d 'zi r br' ., -i I I I II��b ,-`� 1 t.#I,; J. Jr I � s..., a E �la is ti'y a- y: vrs.-1 -1.-.-r '4 i_ s. TOW lR RD I' k � ` P' �0 F 4 it' '- , b: A-1'4 Rl • r, MIINATEERO r ; 1.�Z a1 111 �i, r [ � � I i': '' y s9 I � -�� (;� I 99 i r.-...1• 3rJ{ , 4 p a • �' --r &_ O'I,'.s, f•,_.L I � r.. v c- 3 1_• ` � �,y +7 r s t � _ ul r �, f #� -, q o t- a - r a ,:-x:) O: _ 1 i E T:if' I& m �' I F ^7� Gulf :;%.,� fir y4 SANDPIPE4 rI �5�'>�' C. ziZ i4'�f�t 1 Of 1 ` SkIELL ISM ,` W 4:;0 a s r �n ¢P Zr err i I'I _z X►CO R F p �xCL . l.- r` r �: F C ,'t 0" ,al ' , '•S�tyi 4 " ' a.f 1 A ,1<#'¢. -,:I-r a•. I , i µ%t� , � _4rz-- 01E� , : -_-. yq �¢ I ie' 1 -. dFd9 RI a P.F. 12/2/13 gh FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION MAP REV]E ED BY DATE PASSARELLA VINCEN'1'LAN B.B. 12/2/13 Coosulring ItE,:IBED DATE E'la>;I�& ASSOCIATE S co .. _ __ _- --_ _._ _ _�{ Dig! N ,T", P C co Ece Z W P V FL) W SI N o ° so 4I UQ °� °w H' IL J o J Z N w_ wa dC . ou Q°- Q. Gr 0 - w°w wo 4o w3 ww we H < r (�Y,/� C. Z• W Ill m 0 m 0 00 3N NN 0 r— 3 +�9 iii Z 0 O �.) Zm Z N 7i NN wS �'N wee Z.--•== F.-(1) < o W• Q 0 CL J U Q Q 1 uu ''dg Eu-' o a; ou Cl) Z LLJ o r F- .4,2(Jou Z ° u $ u a m= co O LL LL LL L co z , 1- CSUJ 0 = /'\'^ 1- ,1 Z w -K °Q 1- ° r * t- o Qom zou o� moo °o 1 r%J} a cC, o =u., c4 '1t •• = f • •• {• t• • t'r • • ••i • • •f • •• • • •j' r•• •* • •• •• ~ � '\1.• • • tif • N N iis 44' 44 r • 11 ••. •�- • • •' 3 � ._ Ad. •• • ._ • ews !•a- i \r r { { s • • • • •ti • • •• 1••044 f* `tr r { z v 'v• • 7r •+ r • • • •{ •• �•�,•• •• • • j•" c { ti�P+ zip]•am•••iti •• N• • ••▪• •• .•• • • c f j . w � �•F • • • � • r •s * t. • •it { 4•••• •• s • . • • ••.•• 1 •{ f 4 U •• •• •• • • • •t• se• fr a '(�a • • /,j I •.f• •. •S ' W� { • r+4 44 U _ Q 0 • u1.t= . f W i y • • J • \ onl davaav9 viNVS K , . ( v,. • � a .\ • „ _____......... ‘. •® — r ` " © •f te; C �,= a. p • * 1, -�Y ,S �J;G`5�, ��.'.'t1 r-;?=J,� m l c,4'_.(. 8 20— .A-z— 6"..ms,),)• • ti_____ .;-,2 o as w • • ��o 4� L 1` l� __r_7' L E . V . f / W Zi.' H l w -HtMJOHSAV9 • /} W — is r 41 , .(" 44 7,...„i1., f'.._r ---,-f) - ,., 1 ty- r-' - tiJ W T_______r____ 21—_-:_,-,irf,",--7-------,3 -- -e__:----- , L WV 70:0n11 d fIOZ/91/01'0.',14 NOU.V]01 S3103d$oiN3N0JOQ Z 32111DId\S321f101j\SS1\ZIOZ\SISMIZSJI-ZI\ZIOZ\f . 9) ONI o J Cl) -- wN F—W Z N o w Z ,1 >- Y K N o c:24 U F w a . ` zo , 0 (3 v N a o 0., Cr) W Z C K U z r ) Cn 5w � En� aLL uIX tii zz a s o ?( Y. O I .. '-I .. — `G N N Z '-t N,s� �� a sw >� 1 ( n 1 I 1 -` l m .______ _._ _________6 „..4\11 N. o E— O \ \\ W o U . • .0 o ii e CL On19 VthVHliVH V1NdS cC 10 . p Od NI�dH.l1Nf10� e > u) ill ❑ '1 )! '� Via.qy d r 1>_____:_-_,--C7-----f- o Er /1--)-s-3),_-...-i_.4 ' rir _, ")J°. _ 7" 0 Z a d0 NW., ./'� ;° /�' lye h („ I w #OHSAVB c•j •(�Jet fe ir , "� J - S'\ r-r1),rte ! —v-( q Wd Zf:90Z d 71OZ/ZZ/I-dxu'S3NOZ 831-1114Vd f 3af 191j\s3an9 1j\SSl\ZIOZ\SIO\901Zs]rZ1\ZIOZ\-f 0, W OKI Z f-.o <,.: WN° CW O U o w o I°'� . z ��\ c4 8 3'a z ' jr) w W ❑ Q M N to W LL 2 I I-- i Z--------f----- V) CU N o�o� o■ -I o 0 I NQyE r^ (J) J o L. oW 3 i VJ (n Z It.. r OO:ny Q o— W 5 303 g CO Z p O m O a V 3 N !iii Z OJ J D` O` O` O O W F~- `l/ li .o .o .0 z IL 3 i 3 OLop. = 1 ' 0.6'8; N N El N a N a M N ° N I 1 cccr=,..- 1 1: .1 1• ur ,4 ° 5 .+ » III_l r.: GO c= W- a 4 cp op 0 / -.. w z \ = ® g _ e. j- -s ,.r_... 0v ® � Z 1) _______,____ \ Ir__________ — oo-- , _ m ( a rr NI rrr f --- ;,,,atr c ° r7+ CA','- Wd SS=SI Z a 7103/32/1-.V4149'31 000 S3103000d 00015 000M'7 3tl001'\SONIMV0O 0OD\53a00Id\SS1\ZIOZ\SI9\BOIZS3rZl\Z10Z\f tea�' ,r S r {, - ' 4. ry . y .� 1io'•4 • , , . :,,„ .... ,. ., •i r, .w T i •�� „3 �^ t �. ice' •-' pi,,,..,-..„,-,3\sx, . "t " • , >4.v - ,.". -. �� . _• 0. -/' '�f> try �'�+ . t_ '� -� * ■ *7. _...,.. .. . -y /` r ;I d•.c.' . 4- ,,,/ - .,'• •. ,7;..- • . ,: ''''.."4•ot. -,' "" - ' ". • , p.L.*-•,, c: • a�2�� 11 ". a .• vim.. ; ,y • a•• ,s• - 1 t I4 s ,,s' r t• 4�, y t r' ' r� ' is . }r • ' 1. ,, �� r'1s � F �v ' v. -v. .' e F' 7 r• a ' ` a �P 'si � / :/ J / . r a .- ° 's f AN 5 a s _ ., • �' 0 ,, r t • 1i!•° Mls .„S v 1 r '+. y v O to i• / - Ir• ` - >. LEGEND: ��it r 1 z. r APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF WALKED � � r �.� f� , -�' '4 �+°•. a, N = TRANSECTS ;7 NOTES: -I «..�' _ ..• A"'• 1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE '73 Y t' (,-- .le I' COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH } a r * _ •% Z „ - , 9 A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2010. : + 1 J 9 f ' 1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER MARCO SURVEYING& • `4 '` 111 �` B MAPPING LLC.DRAWING No.P092-VINCENTIAN•PUD_V4.owG e' f -4 • +•r? �• t } -4 - •IATED MARCH 19,2012. _: .tr=- • ■ -• a t DRAWN BY DATE It rl FIGURE 5.AERIAL WITH SURVEY TRANSECTS H.H.RBY s/DoTlz PAS SARE LLA VINCENTIAN REVISED ED DATE ��w,� B.B. s�zo�iz n&_ ASSOCIATES z EXHIBIT C CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES ci3Rtu-1Zy1 97,S"'`:r MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA CABINET DIVISIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ST?'—° ,'Ej�--:- ._�U�-"., Office of the Secretary ',:'._t:'" - Historic Florida Keys Preservation Board Office of International Relations �> �'�- - ^, Historic Palm Beach County Presetvation Board p tom:= .•'•_' -- Division of Administrative Services t - : -f - Historic Pensacola Preservation Board Division of Corporations ka: a �;...1,77:.;„."-,.;_ .�, 1T�T Historic St.Augustine Preservation Board Division of Cultural Affairs • . _'`- :-. Historic Tallahassee Preservation Board Division of Elections Al;t '.gip day t(.�?`. Historic Tampa/Hillsborough County Division of Historical Resources `'+�.._•.,,,,,, Division of Library and Information Services Preservation Boatd Division of Licensing - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Ringling Museum of Art Sandra B -Morth�.n �ry '( .7-1rm'' —„m Secretary of State f' ' DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES MAY 2 3 r�r�„� ,:B May 18, 1998 • • Mr. Andrew Woodruff In Reply Refer To: Passarella and Associates, Inc. Robin D. Jackson 4575 Via Royale, Suite 104 Historic Site Specialist Fort Myers,Florida 33919 Project File No. 982363 RE: Cultural Resource Assessment Request • USACOE Nationwide Permit Vincentian Planned Unit Development • Project No. 98RWA241 Collier, County,Florida Dear Mr. Woodruff In accordance with the procedures contained in 36 C.F.R.,Part 800("Protection of Historic Properties"),we have reviewed the referenced project(s)for possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing,in the National Register of Historic Places. The authority for this procedure is the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665), as amended. A review of the Florida Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the project area. Furthermore,because of the project location and/or nature it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. Therefore, it is the opinion • of this office that the proposed project will have no effect on historic properties fisted, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Your interest in protecting Florida's historic properties is appreciated. Sincerely, - ...,....,..„,_. Q . /d, • Lgoll • .. George W. Percy,Director Division of Historical Resources • and GWP/Jri State Historic Preservation Officer • DIRECTOR'S OFFICE R.A.Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee,Florida 32399-0250 • (904)488-1480 FAX: (904)488-3353 • WWW Address http://www"dos.state.fl.us 0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Si HISTORIC PRESERVATION O HISTORICAL MUSEUMS (904)487-2299 • FAX:414-2207 (904)487-2333 • FAX:922-0496 (904)488-1484 • FAX:921-2503 Rental Apartment Survey Collier County, Florida March 11, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014 Prepared for Mr. Christopher Shucart Global Properties of Naples. Prepared by Michael J. Timmerman, CRE, FRICS, SRA ResortProperties.com, Inc. 1415 Panther Lane Suites 367 Naples, Florida 34109 239-269-0769 ATTACHMENT "D" TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 CONDITIONS OF THE REPORT 3 1.1 INTENDED USE OF THIS REPORT 3 1.2 INTENDED USER OF THIS REPORT 3 2.0 SCOPE OF STUDY 3 2.1 TASK PLAN 3 3.0 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA OVERVIEW AND FORECAST 4 4.0 DEMOGRAPHIC AND MARKET PROFILE 5 4.1 OVERVIEW OF FLORIDA 5 4.2 OVERVIEW OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA 5 5.0 COLLIER COUNTY RENTAL APARTMENT MARKET 6 5.1 MARKET RATE APARTMENTS 16 6.0 MARKET PERFORMANCE SCORE 22 7.0 NEW RENTAL APARTMENT SUMMARY 25 8.0 FEE SIMPLE CONDOMINIUM RENTALS 26 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMANDATIONS 30 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 31 RESTRICTION UPON DISCLOSURE AND USE 33 COPYRIGHT,TRADEMARK AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER 34 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE 35 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 2/36 Introduction As we understand it, GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client")would like ResortProperties.com, Inc. ("Consultant")to study the rental apartment market in Collier County, FL. This study is to research the supply and demand trends and associated pricing of the rental apartments in Collier County, FL. It will conclude with a report summarizing the market conditions. 1.0 Conditions of the Report The Client is responsible for representations about its development plans, marketing expectations and for disclosure of any significant information that might affect the ultimate realization of the projected results. There will usually be differences between projected and actual results because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and the differences may be material. 1.1 Intended Use of This Report The intended use of the analysis is to provide GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client")with a current understanding of the supply and demand ratio and associated pricing of the rental apartment market in Collier County. 1.2 Intended User of This Report The intended user of this analysis is GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client") only. No other users are authorized to use the report for any other purpose. 2.0 Scope of Study Based on our understanding of the current situation, the Consultant has developed a scope of work to analyze the Project as identified above. The scope is based on the Client's objectives, as described to the Consultant, which includes the following interrelated tasks. 2.1 Task Plan We will perform the following scope of professional services in order to meet the objectives of this assignment: Phase 1 Task 1 —Research and profile all the rental apartment complexes in Collier County and provide a conclusion of the supply and demand trends and associated pricing for the county as a whole. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 3/36 3.0 Southwest Florida Overview and Forecast As of the July 2012,census estimate,there are an estimated 1.14 million people living year-round in Southwest Florida. Since the 2000 Census, the area's population has increased by 38%, the equivalent of 305,000 new residents. Looking ahead, Southwest Florida will continue to gain new residents at a faster rate on a percentage basis than the state of Florida. By the year 2015, the population of Southwest Florida is projected to total 1.21 million residents. This is an annual growth rate of 1.06%from 2012 to 2015 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 0.83% during the same time period. The Consultant analyzed the major economic growth trends driving Collier County and generated a forecast for those indicators through 2015. The population of Collier County grew slightly between 2009 and 2010, then increased in 2012 and is expected to reach the peak population of 353,896 by 2015. The analysis is derived from the Consultant's annual economic forecast — •-�.•� +nL•:r•4 pre.,riti^�c �r••••1••+in rl is," �c!-�' " r.In.rmcr' �nr! rnnetriur on fnrer OP. At the �;. - - --- - - -- - - - - - ---------'-- -------- _- - county level. The 2015 forecasted population represents a 6.4% increase over the 2012 population. Accompanying this population growth was a short term employment decline from 2009 and 2010; with growth occurring in 2011 and 2012.We expect increases in employment as the real estate market expands and as the baby boomers increase their purchases of second homes. The corporate relocation of Hertz Global in Estero will also help to spur employment growth in Collier. The majority of the decline in employment was in the construction industry and related support services such as mortgage and real estate services. The recent increases in employment have been in education, health care and retail trade, with the real estate related industries increasing steadily. Housing Market. The housing market grew at an unsustainable pace from 2002 to 2006 creating an excess supply of housing units in relation to households formed in several areas of Collier County. The areas which saw the majority of this growth were generally more affordable areas of Naples Park, Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates. The abundance of easy money moved the market incentive for homes from one of personal preference to one of speculation. This speculative market inflated pricing beyond the historical property appreciation trends providing the market with false expectations of future home value stability. Home pricing began to fall in late 2006 and did not begin to stabilize until the third quarter of 2009. Since the beginning of 2011, home prices have risen and have reached a growth rate of more than 15°A per year over the past 2 years. This growth rate is not sustainable and is anticipated to level off as the inventory increases. There is currently pent up demand for new homes, however many existing homeowners who move up or down will explore new construction if the cost is commensurate with purchasing an existing home of similar utility. The new supply of housing will help alleviate the current shortage of product and provide a balance in the supply demand ratio. This limited supply of housing was also noted in the rental apartment market as no new projects were added due to the high cost of land. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 4 136 4.0 Demographic and Market Profile 4.1 Overview of Florida Florida is currently the nation's fourth most populous state, home to an estimated 19.3 million people. The U.S. Census Bureau projections indicate that the top three fastest-growing states between 2010 and 2030 will be Florida (300,000 persons/year), Texas (400,000 persons/year), and California(400,000 persons/year). Florida is expected to have the largest net growth as well as the third highest percent increase (approximately 600 new residents are expected to move to Florida each day starting in 2014). By the year 2030, Florida's population is projected to total 28.7 million people and will edge past New York into third place in total population(California and Texas would continue to rank first and second respectively). Florida's population growth is depicted in the map below. This shows the latest projections of growth by county for the year 2030. As you can see, the most heavily populated counties in Florida are Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties in Southeast Florida; Hillsborough and Pinellas counties in the Tampa metro market; Orange County in Central Florida, and Duval County in the Jacksonville metro area. Table 4.1.1 2030 Population Projections by County —- IN 4 Florida Counties Population Projections 2030 N =r_ill i 1 100.000 or less _ ®100,001-250,000 - -- �� i -250,001-500,000 -500,001-1,000,000 -1.000 001+ - r -<>-' . 0 45 90 190 Mles Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 4.2 Overview of Southwest Florida Southwest Florida is defined by the three-county region that consists of Lee, Collier and Charlotte counties. The chart below shows the 2012 population estimate by county along with the 2015 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 5/36 Population estimate. Charlotte County is the smallest of the three counties with 14% of the region's population while Lee County is the most populated with 57% of the total. Table 4.2.1 Southwest Florida Region Annual Growth County 2012 Population %of Regic 2015 Population %of Region Rate Charlotte 162,449 14.2% 169,681 13.9% 1,446 Lee 645,293 56.6% 695,952 57.1% 10,132 Collier 332,427 29.2% 353,896 29.0% 4,294 Total 1,140,169 1,219,529 Source: Bureau of Economic&Business Research, 2012 Population Estimates Currently, there are an estimated 1.14 million people living year-round in Southwest Florida. Since the 2000 Census, the area's population has increased by 38%, the equivalent of 310,000 new residents. Looking ahead, Southwest Florida will continue to gain new residents at a faster rate on a percentage basis than the rest of the State of Florida. By the year 2015, the population of Southwest Florida is projected to total 1.21 million residents. This is an annual growth rate of 1.06 % from 2012 to 2015 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 0.82% during the same time period. Strong population growth in the Southwest Florida market is due to both the in-migration of young professionals looking for a better quality of life as well as the ongoing arrival of baby boomer retirees. The number of baby boomers reaching retirement age is expected to peak in 2020, however the delay in this group's move to other markets has been pushed ahead, therefore the demand is expected to increase. The appeal of the Southwest Florida market indicates a steady demand for housing over the long term. In addition to the growth in permanent residents, the number of visitors to the area is on a continuous rise. Southwest Florida International Airport, located in Lee County, has undergone a $438 million expansion with future capacity to handle ten million passengers annually. In 2012, the annual traffic was 7.3 million passengers which is up from prior years. The expansion of the 1-75 and a dedicated interchange (currently under construction) for RSW has significantly improved the capacity of vehicular transportation infrastructure. The annual economic impact of the Southwest Florida International Airport is estimated at$3.8 Billion annually. Overall, the infrastructure investments made in Southwest Florida over the past 5 years have significantly improved the future capacity for growth. This capacity will allow more residents to enjoy the quality of life currently afforded to the market. It will also positively impact the area's ability to attract new business,which would help to diversify the local economy,further enhancing the region's future growth potential. 5.0 COLLIER COUNTY RENTAL APARTMENT MARKET A review of 41 rental apartments in Collier was conducted to estimate the overall supply. The apartments utilized in this sample are those with 100 or more units and range in age from new to ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 6/36 40 years.The projects are located throughout the county with the newer communities located in southern Collier County due to historically lower land cost and availability of land in the urban area. Located below is a map showing the location of the apartments researched for this study followed by a map key. } ' aMp ID .,„i.I. '_-�••L lubl _annlly Club ..a!:i ct Gtedt,,,I, 1":-..."'Y'-.01,try+:luk MI `:i1x;e �. .hits AI,11,• 071'c1C1r>1 •111.■i:1 ':I,-0.1 Co.ntry 3iiliCWI) ^11" Tha f41bAl Crux ly E•_nda l:3 F17%; •'.iiA E.,E..'r 4.b al 01.1:.M60 0147,1ub •-iT:c:3 1+,4 r,31 TN n.:•e.)Ibi -,.t,-lut ,li 7T�� lied _ ,'-Jil 1':,«.i.Y='Yb�1:�GY1lii1•k:le•.Rd. __ , : Calusa • Pule: ,:.w11 CGbt, hb4c:n 1•1Jr14 TrWron•• � UD,CJu6 g„11 i ;,n1•.,Inl1 cur.tr, 01,ds, �: : C b , ,'1''b ,_.,511,v 1,:1; 1 I1 11 rt,._ „i_ Golden Gate alvdW ® 14 • Pin*Ridrd-` - •• /� i i m 10 ^ e _ rc - • I38J191 1 tt s i 13 LL G c,F1 �t Gold.n i1-” . , 1, s m 0 3r�C='._:34 k n=Gk c —__..__ 13 .tunrig, Roam• • • • 7 • NapIC:. ""- us IIVJ•84' 11 P MI s :• NepleS a : 1. Bay 2 18 Ij 29 ra�, -..R a:g e:n_ke H±rvnu_>' t11.'a tla -r•,; 47 '- A Countty CleIt a: ,y ...alb rivice.r,'ift,; i m bL.r;d1 &0 r. T p: 1rs.111 •ice_ , i Sa.V Sotrcw:i ri C1ttme,MAVTEC,USGOblermep,PC.HRCAN,Bra Japan. b¢71,Esri Chita;Hcng Kerg}.Esri lThaisntlj:t8I Tem,2313 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 7/36 Map_ID Project Map_ID Project 1 Bear Creek 21 Northgate Club 2 Belvedere 22 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) 3 Berkshire Reserve 23 Ospreys Landing 4 Bermuda Island 24 Meadow Brook Preserve(Turtle Creek) 5 Brittany Bay I&II 25 River Reach 6 Bryn Mawr 26 Sabal Key 7 College Park 27 Saddlebrook Village 8 Coral Palms 28 San Marino(Aventine) 9 Goodlette Arms 29 Shadowood Park 10 Heritage(MerSoleil) 30 Somerset Palms(Arbor View) 11 Heron Park 31 Summer Lakes I 12 Ibis Club 32 Summer Lakes II 13 Jasmine Cay 33 Summer Wind 14 La Costa 34 Tuscan Isle 15 Lagu Bay 35 Villas of Capri 16 Malibu Lakes 36 Waverley Place 18 Naples 701 38 Whistler's Green 19 Naples Place I-Ill 39 Windsong Club 20 Noah's Landing 40 Aster Lely 41 Sierra Grande The apartments surveyed include both market and subsidized housing and are all included to provide a census of the rental apartment market. Located below is a profile of each apartment complex followed by a map showing the year built of each complex and the most recent market attributes for each. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 8/36 rn ° o o - ` + ° ` o o '+ m -� m c 0 0 0 : ` Nw N N N N N N N N N N N N w N N N N N N N N w N N w N N N N N N N N N N N N N w w w ( P m 0 o ° 0 0 " . f 0 0 0 0 = 0 T N w N w N w N N w w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w w w w N N N N w N N N y OO~ m n b O o m Omi I� n M'4 ,1 b o r r o W r o W m4 p_N o 0 O o 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 O o N R• - N O O / n o 0 o C 4 r o W m O o m0 ^0 0 ry 0 0 ^ m4 O N • Oo 0 0 0 - 0 , 0 0 0 C O , O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N w N N N N N N N N N N N w N w w N N N N N N w N N o b m r 00 n m m ! `n° 000000000000 m N b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 m N N N N w N w N N N N N w w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w N w N N N N N 0 o e $R e e m e e g o t e e v e m m e e$o e v e v e e $^ m m e m m m m m , m o .y ti m m � � m m m m m m � .i � m � � .y m me ;e Iggggoe �'�m � miA mm ° m �'a ° w mmmmm m m m m b 0 ,. e$ e e e m e f e m e m e a 4m o m e v e e e -e g g m g m 4m m m o m ,' m m m O m d cc O o o giWm °8o mmm IPI mMm rm m" m m «i E O 0 e eggm e ggggR e e e 6 e e g g e e eg e m e U e g4 Q F.' U C . e e, e e e e � e`e e e e e,w—e e e e�e `m e P m m m $ m M S m A m S g m m S 2 ° ° , m m m e m m f E 4 O m U , m g, ¢ ro , N S? o m ri �i .� R .i .+ R r. m m m `8 o ry .r.-i E oU m § E§ m m r m g o � ry o M O fi 8 nnm e$ nH m `$ nrr °r `m m °mmRm `dm nn °rrr °nnn °' N r m ry ,y ry ti n :7 `. �. F o O 7 0 ° «Pm $ rbr ^' 4 E1 m a ° rvm r � v mmam � H O O m U 2• 4 } « e o m m 4 o a 8 m mbR V ° C m m m a a o mr aH ° ° rv $ ry ry rv ° o S P ry m ry ry m ry m ry P nE m ry ry ry m ry m m ry X L21 o a ° ry m r ° m 8 H UTI b n ° m N M O o U `n Y U ` I 3 o _ < - L a a Ea E "m - c- .5 > 5 " . 0 « Y t 5 « m a 3 - m t 2 A c g o ; _. E ` a . ° u d a= » m m o o z r E N ° 21 ° a c E D° z, tu E °.�o ou E u ' 'n a A C� �O �m E E E m_ v = ° :: E « i ¢mm22 -6882 9hm222 . 6, 2225 . 52 5 9u 55n 0 rvmvv+ 00m 51 .1mAr'1i°. ..�55 R mgm55mmmmmm55555555 2 }prutCS o..,.,r•.,-r.a.aA - :r;�eir �- - NrckC e Collier Apartments by Year Built 8-6y 2 ' _uru r slut• 1 I %Gllicr '1 it ir- M•3z''4n, 1lt.t t'.'I'ti. F.tntb,•; - lub At Th.= Quzil is rem! imEen:4 ::-.1t:Ind Country GM,CI∎it club 1 t 1_IjL.At '`•rm, t- t h Pl.e rbi C :iJ CoIU:t >II.IuL ':pt,., HerRa�= ,alt,::uli e.:.y 1-.4-0 .,__Cl:.C:fi,. .97- Immok lee lid A ,la Pin:.r • MT. GwHCa C t,i:arl!lust T,b:11Gn amt..rtxlt - +=eltClub ,5alf ,,l...uiltr{ Cttlb _ . ,"tut. _ Vmtderbill€e.:,r.h Ed v EL t I E T = Id Irt J.. GaiJrs E-. - -Pine RrrfrieRLIZ 0 Ey ` z a Z; z = a y 1-r a 4.4-'i D .cIfGI.1L. `c . Ai t.1un1 ipel - Rad.",T mf3 t AI r_rt n �. Jr Nap!ft -- Davis EaI.d'4; Q 7 el p Nap/es `t it 1, , Legend 6Ffy 1 11 CoilierApartments_2_14 21 e a.Jesnake.Hammoc rJ YRBLT_ACT r:„70 c III n ;I 11111 cut'., 0-1980 Doll6r .?. 11 y ` ii 1981 -1990 f s0;�;,�inr, `t 1991-2000 1) fS '1% !l1 it, 2001-2005 t i jl_,,..; ,r, r1 6 200 -2014 .!Sauces:Esri,C_=xme,t1AVTEQ,l)SGS,IntoTrac.,c.tJRCAH,Esrl Japan, ~_,METI,Esri China IHcng Kong).Esri IThslsnd),Tom 1.2013 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 10/36 CD CO n .<i g c d ri o i COW a .n VT '^ co N 01 2 O n C 03 „t .- '.1 K 0! 03 V VT in O ,� 1 - U) 8 re ~ c-1 A. 03 Q U3 N CO N '1 N N 00 ul Ol O n Ql N 1R al O N M N 03 01 M 01 CO n to 1' CO CO 01 00 01 00 0 01 00 N 0 CO n W .i 0 IN CO 00 03 N CO Ot D0 IN CO O O OD N d o o ci ci ' O e-i o C7 A .-i O ' o O e-1 .�i O d d C7 o d 0 0 0 0 Ai A C N 0_ m M V} VT in VT V} 1aa?in V}VT(?VT VT V} VT VT in VT VT VT N VT VT VI.1/T VT V}V?V}Vf VT VT O U) tUO 1011 IIR N O On O tOtl f.�'1 000 0 M t00 N In1 n 0011 0 l0R O Q LID 00) M O n M O� U) n l0A S (0 01 0 00 01 01 3 CD '1 0 O t0 a1 O 01 01 01 N Ol ul Ol 01 0 0 01 01 01 Ol 01 CM 111 .i N ' 0: 03 03 .mot .i'1 e-1 .-11 't ti .--i .ti .i 03 .-1 N o a) 00 03 M N VT VT VT V? VT N V}V•V)VT tR VT N t/0 N 1/? VT VT aR VT VT VT V}VT VT V}H VT V) (l) 1(� �} p a p p tl1 0 Lew N w 4 O W ln0 ON 00 W N N O c00 tD O O LA o 1011 Lmll u01 O O 0 'i V .M-I N a) N N M V' �"1 O ei 0 N N en en eee---111 rl a-1 ,1 M M .-1 N N ei .-1 O , N '-I N N ti N .4 N ci N N a-1 N N N N ti N 't ti N a-1 N'1 N N c-1 N H (p m M pp 01 •' m .�'1 O .�-1 00 00 n On1 001 001 N o w 0 001 0011 001 000 N 0 0 00 01 N n co 000 Co n 00 s-I 000 CO 0 n 0m .~i N 001 6 0 .+ ' .i o ri o c ' o 0 o c .-i .d .-i o A o 0 0 0 .-i 'i .i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-i o 0 0 0 4 .-i o Q 03 m U N VT Vppf VT 510 1/Y0[R tR VT VT V.VT 1R V}VT /p0 VT VT Vf Vf VT V)OR VT{R 1R VT V}V}V>V1 VY OR 5/0 V?tR N VT VT VT 4081 UR C 22 2�\ W N 03 00 N 00 CO Ot 00 001 O 00l N 'i N 00l 03 000 001 0 CO .si o O CO O 000 101n1 01 01 Ol 00 000 N CO n CO ou N .y Oai O E K .-1 '1 .i .i .-1 '1 .-i .i .-1 .i c-t .-1 .'t o K N 03 N in 11. VT 1R V}V/tn.N N Vpp.V}VT V?V}in N VT V•01.in VT in.VT VT in V}VT VT 1R VT VT in VT tR N N VT VT Cl) O n V01 .i 001 lOR N l0 N t0 N 000 0ryv r�m� VM' .�i O .i l0 t00 opop N0 N N M M p0p n 1M11 00 rn M CO cr, 01 00 000 10R 0�r1 ry eN-1 •L a) 00 0 `.i 0f 0 01 01 Ol .-I at .i .f N O 00 01 01 0 0 01 0 0 . 0 'i O 0 0 01 01 n 00 01 0 0 .i .1 O Q. .y + 'i 't ti rt .t r si .ti.t ti 't .t 't.i.t si ti 'i .4 r ,i. O COW a. N �+ N t0 N LO .O Vl 01 n M 1R O LO 1!1 n O1 CO V' d' C O 8 N 8 O M .� C n 0 6 ei N O1 .i 0 n Ol 0 CO 00 .i N C) 01 O1 O1 H 01 s N O M O .� 8 8 dt O Of Ol N N O y ` .-i .i o .-i ri '1 0 .-i o 'i .-i -i .-i o 0 0 'i 0 .-i .-i .-1 A ' A A A A o Al o o '1 'i .-i CC tn. V N510 VT VT VT VT VT 1/0 VT VT VT VT 1R VT VT pa VR VT V}VT VT VT VT VT VT VT Vt VT VT 1.VT V}VT VT VT 51) O 1.11 LO 0 o CV LO 01 O O M 40 Obi n 00 1� n 31 8 N N 0'Ri O�l N n 1� N CO 001 tM0 a-1 00 O Tr co N 1^ O u�nl tO N tM0 lM0 O 00 OO C0 .-i '1 '1 .-1 AT 0! CO 'i 1/0 VT VT V} V}tn.VT VT 1/) VT VT iR VT VT VT VT 1R VT in 1R VT N VT - 1R VT■14.Vp)VT in VT VT VT VT tv Ol N N 000 000 00 n N 01 CO 00 00 n n n W 00 LO IN n 00 Cr, CO 10/nl 10M` 8 t�lnl N N N n W O~i 03 CO 03 .i 0 O U G) O1 C▪I 1I C H_ N > 2 Y O �l 13.1 To ` 0 , O n¢ V) - o h = a 00 a == 0 — = m a O 3 z eff y v € - 00 a ¢ c Y > m E _ i > 0 a a-f QU N U Z c y ( Off C o c m T O E G = m o ° 'g c a, S m mo c o OJA 3 N m " no N a m m g ; 1O u u >' > A °' - 3 :° a 3 n d ' ` °' ` ` o l m E = N `3 C a y en 0 . l0 m 0 > 0 z Y v m 3 e 0., aI 0 ai w ▪ a O d O O ' 0 0 0 O Gl s N u OOj00 f0 O F 00 0 0 m 0- 0 > (00 ((00 N .L 0 > > > j = N L z c ,�0, d d E ¢ mmmmm` muut7xx 3 22zzzz082R. ■ U) 1R V1NC. 'RIRr > 3333 ¢ vl ¢ CD °- R c c..-1 N M a m t0 n 00 Ol .`iy .0y m .a-1 .i '0i .ni CO 0 c-1 N0 N N N N N N N N 0011 M 03 M A M 2. M M (011 00 00 /—\ ® c Located below is a summary of the historical occupancy and rental rate for each of the apartments comparing January 2011 to December 2013. Overall Occupany Weighted Rent COMPLEX SUMMARY History per SQFT MapID Apartment Year Built Total Units Avg sqft 1_1_2011 12/1/2013 1/1/2011 12/1/2013 1 Bear Creek 1995 120 969 93% 100% $ 0.72 $ 0.92 2 Belvedere 1986 162 612 100% 100% $ 0.62 $ 0.70 3 Berkshire Reserve 2000 146 1,300 81% 100% $ 0.77 $ 0.82 4 Bermuda Island 1999 360 1,051 88% 97% $ 1.06 $ 1.12 5 Brittany Bay I&II 2002 392 1,011 97% 93% $ 0.76 $ 0.85 6 Bryn Mawr 1998 240 938 86% 98% $ 1.02 $ 1.15 7 College Park 1999 210 954 98% 97% $ 0.76 $ 0.90 0 r.,.ai Dad{,.p 19R7 7.88 821 • 90% 100% S 0.78 $ 0.98 9 Goodlette Arms 1976 250 486" 100% 100%" $ 1.92 $ 1.75 10 Heritage(MerSoleil) 2001 320 1,012 92% 90% $ 0.70 $ 0.84 11 Heron Park 1997 248 947 100% 96% $ 0.77 $ 1.00 12 Ibis Club 2000 134 1,017 90% 95% $ 0.70 $ 0.79 13 Jasmine Cay 1995 72 1,100 99% 99% $ 0.73 $ 0.88 14 La Costa 1995 276 1,080 94% 92% $ 105 $ 1.26 15 Lagu Bay 1989 363 1,027 93% 98% $ 0.91 $ 1.06 16 Malibu Lakes 2002 356 1,057 97% 99% $ 0.99 $ 1.13 17 Meadow Lakes(Saxon Manor) 1997 252 996 92% 98% $ 0.75 $ 0.94 18 Naples 701 1975 188 750 86% 98% $ 0.83 $ 0.97 19 Naples Place I-Ill 1985 160 800 97% 99% $ 0.95 $ 1.06 �� 20 Noah's Landing 2002 264 971 92% 100% $ 0.68 $ 0.88 21 Northgate Club 1988 120 910 92% 90% $ 0.74 $ 0.98 22 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) 1991 216 969 100% 100% $ 0.89 $ 1.03 23 Ospreys Landing 1995 176 1,013 95% 96% $ 0.74 $ 0.86 24 Meadow Brook Preserve(Turtle Creek) 1997 268 952 62% 96% $ 0.80 $ 1.12 25 River Reach 1987 556 902 95% 100% $ 0.85 $ 1.07 26 Sabal Key 1987 200 976 91% 100% $ 0.82 $ 1.04 27 SaddlebrookVillage 1999 140 834 98% 99% $ 0.53 $ 0.65 28 San Marino(Aventine) 2001 350 1,092 72% 96% $ 0.84 $ 107 29 Shadowood Park 1989 96 1,185 100% 100% $ 0.63 $ 0.74 30 Somerset Palms(Arbor View) 1999 168 1,057 85% 95% $ 0.62 $ 0.72 31 Summer Lakes I 2003 140 1,162 96% 95% $ 0.69 $ 0.84 32 Summer Lakes II 2007 276 1,032 97% 97% $ 0.73 $ 0.88 33 Summer Wind 1986 368 883 98% 97% $ 0.83 $ 1.01 34 Tuscan Isle 2003 298 920 89% 30% $ 0.74 $ 0.88 35 Villas of Capri 1997 235 928 76% 97% $ 0.78 $ 0.99 36 Waverley Place 1990 300 840 78% 97% $ 0.82 $ 0.87 37 Whistler's Cove 1999 240 1,042 96% 90% $ 0.75 $ 0.80 38 Whistler's Green 1999 168 1,051 96% 95% $ 0.74 $ 0.81 39 Windsong Club 1993 120 991 98% 99% $ 0.78 $ 0.84 40 Aster Lely(New) 2014 308 1,153 $ 1.13 41 Sierra Grande(New) 2014 270 1,175 $ 1.09 Average Avg 1996 Total Units 9814 • Percent of Total Average Size Average Occupancy 92% 95% Cng from prior period 2% -1% Average Weighted Rent persgft $ 0.81 $ 0.96 ..----.,Cng from prior period 2% 5% ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 12/36 The development of apartments in Collier County started in the mid 1970's with a surge of new development occurring in the mid 1980's which coincided with the first wave of new residential development. As we can see from the graph below,the majority of the apartments built consisted of 1 and 2 bedroom units. The first real influx of 3 bedroom units did not begin until the mid 1990's, following that decade's recession. Development of rental units from the mid 1990's through today consisting primarily of 2 and 3 bedroom units with a very limited supply of 4 bedroom units. Historical Development 1400 1200 1000 w 800 600 — .`— L.F 400 200 I 111 , w >-_x 0 ninlin111 " 1111 Lf1 l0 ul 7.0 r, CO Ql 0 a-i M 111 1- co Ol O ai N m I, 1, co co Co co co 01 01 01 01 01 01 Ol 0 0 0 0 0 e-+ 01 Ol 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 m Ol 01 T Q1 0 0 0 0 0 0 e•1 a-I r-I .--, r-1 a-1 c-I a-i e--I e-1 ei N a-1 N N N N N N ■Sum of 1BR ■Sum of 2BR tj Sum of 3 BR 'Sum of 4BR Product size by bedroom count has stayed relatively consistent for the 1 bedroom and has increased slightly for 2 and 3 bedroom units.The few 4 bedroom units are the designs that have increased in size the most. Unit Size by BR Count and YR Built 1800 1600 1400 0.111.1200 WNW ONO 1000 '-'y�5 800 ! IN 11 Ara NI 600 1III1IiUIU• i zoo 1990 1991 1993 1995 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2007 2014 MOM Average of1BR MEI Average of 2BR 1 Average of 3BR MINN Ave rage of 4BR •Linear(Average of 1BR)— —Linear(Average of 2BR) •Linear(Average of 3BR)•Linear(Average of 4BR) ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 13/36 Located below we will analyze the projects based on their location, age and rental rate per sqft. The chart and graph below represent the weighted rate per sqft based on the unit mix of all the projects.As we can see the rate has increased significantly over the past four years. Average Rate by Bedroom Count Bedroom Count Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 1Bed $ 0.90 $ 0.94 $0.91 $1.00 $1.11 2 Bed $ 0.77 $ 0.79 $0.80 $0.89 $0.95 3Bed $ 0.71 $ 0.75 $0.73 $0.81 $0.91 4Bed $ 0.76 $ 0.78 $0.81 $0.85 $0.91 $1.15 - $1.05 - $0.95 - $0.85 - _ r $0.75 $0.65 - $0.55 $0.45 $0.35 ,y0 y0 ,�1 .�1 y1 op. yN. N. y1. ,ti'b ,y'L 1,y y'L 4;1- '' ', y3 {A, y'� P," Oc� OTC 1y,d V9 \JC PpGi Oca O�c c<e`o V9 1JC Pp4i Oc'� Oec Ce' PQ< 'J� 'S Ora c -1Bed -2 Bed --3 Bed ---4 Bed Occupancy has also risen significantly over the past 4 years to the current 95%which represents stabilized occupancy when you consider a 5%turnover rate. Located below is a chart and graph showing the historical occupancy from October 2010 to present. • Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 Avg Occupancy 90% 92% 91% 96% 95% ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 14/36 Historical Occupancy 97% 96% 95% 94% — _. -- —--- — — --- 93% 92% = 91% 90% 89% --- — l 88% 87% O O N. 1 N. N. 1 1 'L 'L 'L 'L 'L 'L 13 3 3 3 O`;1 O� ��1 PQ1,�1 J461 O`L1 O�;r Q��y PQ�,11�c1 PJ�1 O`,�1 Q¢;ti�e�S PQ�;1'J;y PJ% o& Op`1 —AvgOccupancy The chart and graph below show the rental rates and size by bedroom count for the current period. Bedroom Count Avg Size Dec 2013 Rate 1 Bed 776 $ 1.11 2 Bed 1,015 $ 0.95 3 Bed 1,209 $ 0.91 4 Bed 1,407 $ 0.91 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 15/36 Relationship of Avg Size to Rate per sqft 1,600 — $1.20 1,400 - $1.00 1,200 $0.80 1,000 800 . . — $0.60 600 - $0.40 400 - $0.20 200 1 Bed 2 Bed 3 Bed 4 Bed IIIIMAvg Size —Dec2013Rate 5.1 Market Rate Apartments Market rate apartments were the first developed in the county, with subsidized housing starting in the late 1980's to accommodate the increasing employment for hotels and other hospitality related industries. The mix of units by bedroom count is consistent with the overall supply and is primarily 1 and 2 bedroom units. The major influx of market rate 3 bedroom units did not begin until 2000 when the availability of affordable family accommodations was restricting due to rapidly rising home prices. The majority of rental apartment complexes within the Collier County and the general region, are located on major arterial roadways in order to provide easy access for their tenants, higher visibility for rental apartment marketing and provide reduced land cost in order to make the ensuing rental rate more affordable. Typically rental apartment complexes prefer to be located closer to employment centers and other support facilities within the area. A convenient location is generally considered more desirable as it reduces transportation cost and thus overall living expenses. There are a significant number of approved residential units within existing planned unit developments in Collier County. These units are generally planned for the development of fee simple condominiums and single-family homes catering to people who want to purchase versus rent.The communities that offer amenities such as lakes, golf courses or other open space utilize those amenities to cater to the larger percentage of the market that prefer to purchase real estate. Located below is a chart showing the market rate apartments based on their density. From this analysis,we can see the average for the existing market rate apartment is over 13 units per acre. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 16/36 MapID Apartmentme County Acerage Density Year Built Total Units 2 Belvedere Collier 10.2 15.9 1986 162 3 Berkshire Reserve Collier 11.41 12.8 2000 146 5 Brittany Bay I&II Collier 37.4 10.5 2002 392 6 Bryn Mawr Collier 20 12.0 1998 240 12 Ibis Club Collier 14.43 9.3 2000 134 13 Jasmine Cay Collier 2.5 28.8 1995 72 14 La Costa Collier 31 8.9 1995 276 15 Lagu Bay Collier 38.2 9.5 1989 363 16 Malibu Lakes Collier 24 14.8 2002 356 18 Naples 701 Collier 8.66 21.7 1975 188 19 Naples Place I-Ill Collier 10 16.0 1985 160 21 Northgate Club Collier 9.95 12.1 1988 120 22 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) Collier 18.4 11.7 1991 216 28 San Marino(Aventine) Collier 40 8.8 2001 350 29 Shadowood Park Collier 13.3 7.2 1989 96 33 Summer Wind Collier 29 12.7 1986 368 36 Waverley Place Collier 27.3 11.0 1990 300 Average 20.34 13.16 1992 231.71 Located below is a map showing the location of the market rate apartments followed by graphs and charts summarizing these projects. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 17/36 .. ... ... Collier Market Rate Apartments • ,, • .:i .41...ip t.-.I- :u.,-.11, - - . . . __... . - ._ . " _-.1■4.■L t Ir.' -'' - . ..- COilier r'.-1;terr., l'' - ,: ,,. , - ■r. %411=04 .....lub ' • At TN-, Otoil.".:r..-,4k z.,..tt end .r.:C.0 WI, f7K-.•11.71u1-, Club I h, , C tub Al '---`,..-1.■, , l.7.PI- .- • ,i-4,-1,7, . Cr Id C.,-..,Iltir C•elf 1._I■1. I-i.c-Il■.*10:. 1 ..31.f4v.::-, H•=171.7194.. i",7,-; C.......::.•'-:...i'....;.:::. ':''..I., 1,Ir ifs kaloP Ft el 1 fq• . .. k..I. ,:.i. 0■:-'lub 1,1 I..IL I, i 1., L.z. '..' ,.-.'orideit.ilt .• G 'Vandeibilt B+2ch Rcl• • :- ! t , i 111111E •: Ili . -111:1-.1......- -GoldEn El E14 ...... Pm 4 Ricli j 9 0 Le . 21 :*- :2' . 1 . v , . . j et 19 .......-- t 76 a = c .R.' C , Gold O.' 15 r:n..k,. flapl,ss '61 . -- ----- 13 Munectpal - RJrilo R cl J j I ; ._. 1 Nap!es , . . aD vi 1 Div d' 81' - ,,, i 1 . : on • Napes . 18 Bay >, 79 40 .: ,n R a ttl e sn ake Harran.ck R I:I _ I Oof I a r A c h:17, Legend , P = YearEnd13MarketScore .1.t... '1 "s, Scur:es:Esri.CeLcrme,--NAVIEO,USGS.IrtoTnsp( vir- .NRCAN.Eiri Japan. 1 METI.Esti China I Hcrg KaM,Esei(Thaknd)..Tarrant.2313 ,....-..... ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 18/36 Historical Development Market 800 700 - U 600 500 400 300 200 100 1 1 1 1 1 0 MN 1975 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990 1991 1995 1998 2000 2001 2002 2014 ■Sum of 1BRU ■Sum of 2BRU LiSum of 3 BRU ■Sum of 4BRU Product size by bedroom count has stayed relatively consistent for the 1 bedroom and has increased slightly for 2 and 3 bedroom units. Unit Size by BR Count and YR Built - Market 1600 1400 • 1200 ... OW "" '■••" ' 4 .•' 1000 atom `M1 P 600 • • • A • • 11- 1 400 • • • u • • • I . '- I 200 • • • U ° 0 1975 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990 1991 1995 1998 2000 2001 2002 2014 NMI Ave rage of 1BRS MIMI Ave rage of 2BRS r Average of3BRS NEM Average of4BRS •Linear(Average of 1BRS)— -Linear(Average of 2BRS) ••Linear(Average of 3BRS) Located below we will analyze the projects based on their location, age and rental rate per sqft. The chart and graph below represent the weighted rate per sqft based on the unit mix of the market rate projects only. As we can see the rate has increased significantly over the past four years. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 19/36 Average Rate by Bedroom Count-Market Bedroom Count Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 1 Bed $ 0.90 $ 0.93 $0.92 $1.02 $1.11 2 Bed $ 0.83 $ 0.85 $0.84 $0.92 $0.99 3 Bed $ 0.80 $ 0.81 $0.80 $0.85 $0.97 4 Bed $ 0.80 $ 0.86 $0.86 $0.92 $0.94 Historical Rate-Market $1.15 $1.05 $0.95 - - -- .. $0.75 $0.65 $0.55 $0.45 $035 4) 4) y1 .yv ,yti y1 NN' .yi 41' 41' 41" ,yL 41' 41' ,y'') 41i 4') 4) 4''3 ,y'e cc- o�c: n PQc lJPAoFn C Pi cc- 0 c§ PQns ma <c. t9. Ns � 4) -1 Bed -2 Bed -----3 Bed -4 Bed Occupancy has also risen significantly over the past 4 years to the current 97%which represents stabilized occupancy when you consider a 3%turnover rate. Located below is a chart and graph showing the historical occupancy from October 2010 to present. Market Rate Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 Avg Occupancy 88% 92% 90% 97% 97% ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 20 136 Historical Occupancy-Market 98% 96% 94% 92% — 90% 88% - 86% 84% 82% ,y0 'y0 ,y'ti ,y1 ,y ,y1 .'ti 'ti titi titi ti titi yti 'L .3 y', 'a y3 y3 13 0- .0. 4,¢b PQt Ns 1•• O° Oec �yo PQt ��o P� Oc¢ Ot' ��b Pub o Oe� —Avg Occupancy The chart and graph below show the market rental rates and size by bedroom count for the current period. Market Rate Bedroom Count Avg Size Dec 2013 Rate 1 Bed 826 $ 1.11 2 Bed 1,047 $ 0.99 3 Bed 1,277 $ 0.97 4 Bed 1,501 $ 0.94 Relationship of Avg Size to Rate per sqft-Market 1,600 $1.20 1,400 111 $1.00 1,200 ■ $0.80 1,000 800 ■ _ ■ , $0.60 600 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ $0.40 400 II 200 ■ ■ $0.20 $- $Bed 2Bed 3Bed 4Bed ENE Avg Size -Dec 2013 Rate ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 21 /36 The market rate apartments are located primarily in the southern portion of the county and have easy access to the employment centers. The newest projects are located in this area due to the availability of land and the lower land cost. 6.0 MARKET PERFORMANCE SCORE The consultant developed a market performance score for each rental apartment complex using age, average occupancy and average rental rate per sqft as criteria. Other subjective criteria, such as condition, management quality, renter profile, etc can be added to the scoring system to enhance the comparison. After the score has been determined, each sites score is mapped to see the spatial distribution of the best performing complexes. For this study, we are only reporting on the market rate projects. After we have determined the criteria for the score, we developed a ranking system for each criterion. In this case a score of between 1 and 5 was selected for each criterion with assigned thresholds for each. The nttribu4 7 and Cr,-, ia' ch newer and a higher attribute. Located below are the criteria and the ranking for each criterion. Age(yrs) to hi score 0 5 5 6 10 4 11 15 3 16 20 2 20 1000 1 Occupancy(%1 lo hi score 95.00% 5 90.00% 94.90% 4 80.00% 89.90% 3 75.00% 79.90% 2 75.00% 1 Rent/Saft(51 lo hi score $0.90000 5 $0.80000 $0.89990 4 $0.70000 $0.79999 3 $0.60000 $0.69999 2 $0.60000 1 A score was assigned to each attribute for each rental apartment complex. Once each attribute is assigned for each rental apartment complex, we weighted each to calculate a final score. Located below is the weighting we assigned to each attributes score. Weights Age 15% Occupancy 50% Rent/Sqft 35% 100% Below are the individual scores for age, occupancy and rental rate per sqft for each of the market rate complexes and the final weighted average score. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 22/36 Project MapID Age Occupancy Rate sqft Market 12/2013 score Belvedere 2 1 5 3 1 4.7 Berkshire Reserve 3 3 5 4 1 5.4 Brittany Bay I &II 5 3 4 4 1 4.9 Bryn Mawr 6 2 5 1 1 4.2 Ibis Club 12 3 5 1 1 4.3 Jasmine Cay 13 2 5 4 1 5.2 La Costa 14 2 4 5 1 5.1 Lagu Bay 15 1 5 5 1 5.4 Malibu Lakes 16 3 5 5 1 5.7 Naples 701 18 1 5 5 1 5.4 Naples Place I-Ill 19 1 5 5 1 5.4 Northgate Club 21 1 4 5 1 4.9 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) 22 1 5 5 1 5.4 San Marino(Aventine) 28 3 5 5 1 5.7 Shadowood Park 29 1 5 3 1 4.7 Summer Wind 33 1 5 5 1 5.4 Waverley Place 36 1 5 4 1 5.1 Aster Lely 40 5 1 5 1 4.0 Sierra Grande 41 5 1 5 1 4.0 The final weighted scores range from a low of 4.0 for Aster Lely and Sierra Grande because they are in the lease up stage of their development to a high of 5.7 for Aventine and Malibu Lakes due to their newer age. In order to identify the spatial distribution of the best performing sites, we mapped each complex and delineated the score range by color code. Located below is a map of the market rate apartment complexes by final weighted score. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 23/36 , _ Dallier Market Rate Apartments c•untrif . a; ' rSMdYt .. .. . - _ lun uai1. t_ounnv Club T.----- :hLr+ Je.tG•:rlf •:irllit't Vie,l er. ■-r.*"_ t1inirp-Aut, F.•:n1r= 4 itt:I.:lel CluP A,Thu t_uatl Cfee Irnr.,AA ;5-ttand CA5Untry :,".1-`LI Club The Club At •ki:...ur,, F.•- 01,1P Ei y AIdC,•14;r If f.:HI. Et gFr._.. _ H-trtr!Fe :1.:I! !A- { 1 Gar a - Fi .tin as 't VJndeiblltB. chRd r• 22 C] �n TI'„ • t3ciden uleyarCl: f N.-r,1?r a m 14 2 r.. Pine Rein. a r El a e ✓ 19 en = te �1 $ t .. c. Q L o. ur a a e. N:r:'1es ----- Gotden uo' .o : 0i rldr, 0 ^6oH:IUb; ' : .x 7 IIttaF1's ;tunrcspal Racliolid airy_rt 0 16 4 O Naples i-DJVlt&lieu 84 r % th O 18 Legend Nraplfes Say CI II Dec 13 sco 0 . Ra:Ueana4:e.HammueitRs. is • Less than 3.5 wt:-:.:u • 3.51 to +;:,tf Club CI:S.:. aunLt ri trOFic i L'chit:Q 4_1 to 4.5 Ski. r A 0 4.51to5 iiter,afv.,: ,,. Over 5 r;....... Scttccs:Esri,CsLerme,NAV'TEC,USGS,Intsmsp:IFC,HP.CAH,Esrl Japan. 1 METI.Esri China[Hong$L'!lg),Esri(Thailand).Tuir?em,2a13 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 24/36 The highest scoring apartment complexes are Avertine, located in Collier Blvd, 1/2 south of Interstate 75 and Malibu Lakes, located south of Immokalee Road adjacent to 1-75. These two communities have similar designs as they offer limited garages and extensive amenities. The other North Naples apartment complexes are located along Pine Ridge Road and have easy access to 1-75, however they are older and reflect dated amenities and unit designs. The existing supply of market rate apartment complexes are enjoying high occupancies and increasing rental rates due to the lack of apartment complexes in the market and more importantly an increase fee simple housing cost which is directing the consumer to the few rental market options available. 7.0 NEW RENTAL APARTMENT SUMMARY The stabilized occupancy of the existing market rate apartments has prompted the development of two new apartment communities.These are located within'/2 mile of each other on Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Blvd in South Naples. Located below is a map showing the location of each complex followed by a brief summary. isiaras raw - - — ■ ,/iF \:-1. Collier New Apartments, _---' oprSierra Grande I1 1 t ra _ mac,. . y .1 1x,. - ;t .1 �o ', ,Aster of Naples .c,„0 y , , _ • , 00000.0000\ c3 ° } -r i a • A. . :, � J Legend t ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 25/36 Seirra Grande Sierra Grande is located on Rattlesnake Hammock Road,just west of the intersection of Collier Blvd. This community was originally developed as for sale condominiums which failed during the great recession. Two buildings were completed and 27 units were sold to individual owners and the remaining units owned by the rental developer and rented as the new units. The site was purchased in June of 2011 for $5,150,00 (OR 4689 PG 3233) for 282 of which 273 are vacant land and 9 area foreclosed units from the prior project. The average of all units was$18,262.The site infrastructure was in place at the time of the sale.This site is 17.9 acres representing a gross density of 10.11 units per acre. The 273 units are divided into 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments ranging in size from 902 sqft to 1,313 sqft. There are 32, three bedroom units, 161, two bedroom units and 80, one bedroom units.The community began leasing the existing units in March of 2013 with the release of newly developing units in January of 2014. Of the seven total buildings, 2 are completed and leased or and three buildings are under t_u t' The occupied by individual I;UfIUUlllll lllllll VVVIICIJ c711U three ullilult,.J alc ial ii.ic� construction. The site visit revealed significant interest as there were people waiting to see a leasing agent. The newly developing buildings are expected to be ready for occupancy by May. Aster of Lely Aster of Lely is located on southwest corner of Lely Cultural Blvd and Collier Blvd, 1/2 mile south of the intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road.This site was vacant at the time of sale and was sold in April of 2007 for$8,635,000 (OR 4210 PG 1766)for 308 units for a price per unit of $28,035. No site infrastructure was included in this sale.This site is 17.79 acres and has a gross density of 17.4 units per acre. As of the updated report, current pricing and availability buildings have been released. This community will consist of 11 buildings and an amenity center, of which five building are complete and available for lease as of this report date. Located below is a summary of the current pricing for each floorplan and the number of unit available of 210 being offered at this time. Floorplan Rental Rat BR Bath SQFT Rent/sqft Available Al 1050 1 1 820 $ 1.28 36 A2 1075 1 1 890 $ 1.21 53 B1 1300 2 2 1100 $ 1.18 4 B2 1325 2 2 1195 $ 1.11 82 Cl 1600 3 2 1435 $ 1.11 11 Total 186 The product mix, unit size and rental rate are consistent with the other market rate rental apartments used in this study. 8.0 FEE SIMPLE CONDOMINIUM RENTALS The consultant also reviewed fee simple condominiums that are rented on an annual basis.The source for this information was the Naples (Multiple Listing Service) MLS. There are several condominium developments that offer comparable amenities and pricing, but were designed to cater to the second home buyer and not designed for rental. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 26/36 The main difference between the fee simple condominium rentals and the apartment rentals is the building design. Rental Apartments are designed for lower construction cost and generally have less exterior windows and have adjacent units on three sides. The market rental rate does not distinguish a difference for design or amenities, but does distinguish a difference for interior finishes. Located below is a summary of the current listings of condominium units available for annual rentals in Collier County based on the March 1, 2014 Naples MLS system, followed by a map showing the location of the NABOR MLS areas. Location _Avg_Size Avg$/sgft NA05-Crayton Rd Area 1209 $2.07 NA06-Olde Naples Area 1851 $1.95 NA02-Vanderbilt Beach Area 1107 $1.81 NA04-Pelican Bay Area 1669 $1.66 NA15-E/O 41 W/O Goodlette 1200 $1.50 NA12-N/O Vanderbilt Bch Rd W/O 75 1626 $1.40 NA01 -N/O 111th Ave 1547 $1.30 NA21-N/O Immokalee Rd E/O 75 1419 $1.23 NA16-S/O Pine Ridge Rd 1358 $1.21 NA14-N/O Pine Ridge Rd and Vineyards 1634 $1.21 NA08-Royal Harbor-Windstar Area 1210 $1.19 NA24-Golden Gate City 757 $1.13 NA17-N/O Davis Blvd 1230 $1.12 NA13-Pine Ridge Area 1042 $1.12 NA11-N/O Immokalee Rd W/O 75 1642 $1.12 NA18-N/O Rattlesnake Hammock 1393 $1.05 NA09-South Naples Area 1579 $1.04 NA38-South of US41 East of 951 1538 $0.98 NA19-Lely Area 1279 $0.91 NA37-East Collier S/O 75 E/O 951 1351 $0.87 NA22-S/0 Immokalee Rd W/0 951 1996 $0.85 Grand Total 1461 $1.28 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 27/36 NABOR MLS Areas 130,111.1 SPrir,gs;pc_..,r.:,-1,=.as,.t ..I.. NA01 NA l l NA21 NA12 NA31 NA22 IMJ4 Al NA14 NA16 NA23 II- NAOS NA24 NA17 ,! E,.� UM), NA 18 NA08 NAO7 I_a,• ,NA19 NAOS -.rig,_ •'::a 4N Scar¢,:Esri,HERE,E eLcrme,USES,Int •msp:Incerrent P Ccrp.,ttl AN, Esri Japan,7AETI,Earl China tHeng Rang),Esri flimflam:),TcrnTom, t:lapmyIndia,S CpenSli a Map mntrihutcrs,and the GIS User Clnemunky ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 28/36 The list above shows the average living area size and price per sqft for the condominiums available for rent by area of the county. The top 5 areas offer waterfront or high end product for rent which is superior in quality and location to the rental apartments in the market. The rental rate for the condominiums in areas where the majority of the rental apartments are located are consistent in price, however are older in age. Located below is a list of condominium rentals that are considered most comparable to the rental apartment markets. Location/Condo Name Avg Size Avg$!sgft Location/Condo Name Avg Size Avg$/sqft NA15-E/O 41 W/O Goodlette 1200 $1.50 NA17-NJO Davis Blvd 1230 $1.12 HIGH POINT COUNTRY CLUB 1200 $1.50 BLUE HERON 1000 $1.18 NA01-N/O 111th Ave 1547 $1.30 COUNTRYSIDE CONDOS 1150 $1.39 BARBADOS 1515 $1.15 ENCLAVE OF NAPLES 874 $1.25 FALLING WATERS NORTH PRESERVE 1586 $0.82 GLENMOOR GREENS 1300 $0.96 MARTINIQUE 1225 $1.18 JASPER 1484 $0.98 SEA GROVE 2061 $1.36 NEW WATERFORD 1212 $1.24 SWEETWATER BAY 1381 $2.17 NEWCASTLE 1450 $1.02 NA12-N/O Vanderbilt Bch Rd W/O 75 1534 $1.24 OPAL 1406 $0.92 CARRINGTON 1250 $1.20 PRESERVE AT THE SHORES 1406 $1.07 CRESCENT GARDENS 1563 $0.96 SHERWOOD 1630 $0.86 EGRETS WALK 1681 $1.34 SPRINGWOOD 1000 $1.15 FIELDSTONE VILLAGE 1456 $1.17 TIMBER LAKE 1340 $1.34 RAVENNA 2015 $1.24 NA13-Pine Ridge Area 1042 $1.12 VICTORIA LAKES 1089 $1.15 MISTY PINES 1242 $1.05 WILSHIRE PINES 1391 $1.44 TURTLE LAKE GOLF COLONY 842 $1.19 NA21-N/O Immokalee Rd E/O 75 1419 $1.23 NA11-N/O Immokalee Rd W/O 75 1642 $1.12 CYPRESS TRACE 1538 $1.48 EAGLE COVE 1621 $0.86 CYPRESS WOODS GOLF+COUNTRY CLUB 1373 $0.95 FEATHER SOUND 1449 $1.04 GRAND CYPRESS II 1763 $0.85 RIVER ROYALE 1400 $129 � \ HUNTINGTON LAKES 1107 $1.63 SPOONBILL COVE 1928 $0.88 TERRACE 1194 $0.96 SWEETWATER BAY 1167 $1.19 NA16-S/O Pine Ridge Rd 1358 $1.21 TOSCANA 2822 $1.59 COLONY AT HAWKSRIDGE 1650 $1.15 VERONA POINTE 1580 $0.89 FAIRWAYS AT EMERALD GREEN 1167 $1.03 NA18-N/O Rattlesnake Hammock 1393 $1.05 KENSINGTON 2686 $1.12 AMBERLY VILLAGE 1216 $1.23 MARBELLALAKES 2143 $0.89 CROWN POINTE SHORES 1585 $0.88 MARIPOSA 1558 $1.16 GLADES COUNTRY CLUB 1270 $126 NAPLES BATH AND TENNIS CLUB 1319 $127 JASMINE COURT 1249 $1.12 POSITANO PLACE 1067 $1.35 LAKE ARROWHEAD 1928 $0.90 RESERVE AT NAPLES 1107 $1.04 LELY PINES 1032 $0.94 TURTLE LAKE GOLF COLONY 842 $1.46 NAPOLI 1033 $1.09 NA14-N/O Pine Ridge Rd and Vineyards 1634 $1.21 RMERACOLONYGOLF ESTATES 1200 $1.13 AVELLINO ISLES 3141 $1.07 VERANDA AT SOUTHERN LINKS 1661 $120 AWWO 2184 $0.87 NA09-South Naples Area 1579 $1.04 BARRINGTON 1216 $1.15 ABACO BAY 886 $1.02 BELLERIVE 1708 $1.00 BOTANICAL PLACE 1968 $0.79 CALUSA BAY NORTH 1282 $1.40 DI NAPOLI 1883 $1.33 CALUSA BAY SOUTH 1982 $1.06 NA38-South of US41 East of 951 1538 $0.98 EMERALD LAKES 1111 $1.33 SONOMA 2110 $0.92 LAKESIDE 1348 $223 TROPIC SCHOONER APTS 966 $1.04 LALIQUE 2050 $1.27 NA19-LelyArea 1279 $0.91 OASIS 861 $1.20 EAGLEWOOD 1250 $0.80 ORCHARDS 1607 $1.12 STMORITZCLUB 1294 $1.00 RUM BAY 1315 $1.14 ST REGIS CLUB 1294 $0.93 SILVER OAKS 1595 $1.12 NA37-East Collier S/O 75 E/O 951 1351 $0.87 NA24-Golden Gate City 757 $1.13 FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT 1351 $0.87 FAIRWAYS AT PAR ONE 735 $1.16 NA22-S/0 Immokalee Rd W/O 951 1996 $0.85 FAIRWAYS AT PAR TWO 768 $1.11 BIMINI BAY 2170 $0.88 FALLS OF PORTOFINO 1822 $0.82 Grand Total 1436 $1.15 As we can see from the above list, the apartments range in size from a low of 735 sqft to a high of over 3,000 sqft and average approximately 1,436 sqft. Many.of these communities cater to . second home buyers or seasonal renters who are generally older than the typical rental apartment tenant. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 29/36 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMANDATIONS The review of the rental apartment market and rental condominiums reveals a current shortage of units available for occupancy.The additional of 581 rental units within Sierra Grande and Aster at Naples will alleviate some of this shortage and may move tenants from older complexes in other parts of the county to these new projects. Location is still a very important factor when renting a unit, however pricing for that location is a differentiator between renting an apartment complex of a fee simple condominium. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 30/36 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS In conducting this market analysis,the consultant has assumed,where applicable,that: 1. Title to the land is good and marketable. 2. The information supplied by others is correct, and the revenue stamps placed on the deeds used to indicate the sale prices are in correct relation to the actual dollar amounts of the individual transactions. 3. There are no hidden or undisclosed sub-soil conditions. No consideration has been given to oil or mineral rights, if outstanding. 4. All general codes, ordinances, regulations or statutes affecting the property have been and will be enforced.and the property is not subject to floodplain or utility restrictions or moratoriums except as reported to your consultant and contained in this report. 5. The party for whom this report is prepared has reported to the consultant no original existing conditions or development plans that would subject this property to the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission or similar agencies on the state or local level. 6. No responsibility is assumed by the consultant for legal matters, nor is any opinion on title rendered herewith. 7. The consultant herein, by reason of this report, is not to be required to give testimony in court with reference to the property analyzed, unless arrangements have been previously made. 8. The consultant has made no survey of the property and assumes no responsibility in connection with such matters. Any sketch or identified survey of the property included in this report is only for the purpose of assisting the reader to visualize the property. 9. No environmental impact studies were either requested or made in conjunction with this study,and the consultant hereby reserves the right to alter, amend, revise, or rescind any of the opinions based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies, research or investigation. 10. Unless stated otherwise, no percolation tests have been performed on this property. In making the study, it has been assumed that the property is capable of passing such tests so as to be developable to its highest and best use, as discussed in this report. 11. Certain data used in compiling this report was furnished by the client,his counsel,employees, and/or agent, or from other sources believed reliable. Data has been checked for accuracy as possible, but no liability or responsibility may be assumed for complete accuracy. 12. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in nature, nor is any opinion rendered herein as to title, which is assumed to be good and merchantable. The property is assumed to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, unless specifically enumerated herein, and under responsible ownership and management as of the date of this study. 13. The forecasts or projections included in this report are used to assist in the process and are based on current market conditions, anticipated short-term supply and demand factors, and a stable economy. These forecasts are therefore subject to changes in future conditions. 14. The consultant has relied upon the demographic data provided by local, state and national sources in order to project population trends, housing trends, gross sales trends, and economic trends for the subject area. The information relied upon is referenced within the applicable section of this report. The consultant does not warrant its accuracy. 15. The consultant has obtained data regarding building permits for single family and multi family products from several sources. It is the consultant's understanding that multi family permits are those for condominiums and for rental apartment complexes. The rental apartment complexes which are known to the consultant have been omitted from this analysis. This, therefore,would reflect condominium unit development as reflected and would correlate with condominium sales based upon the local, state and national sources. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 31 /36 16. The consultant has obtained data regarding building sales for single family and multi family products from local, state and national sources. This data includes Developer sales to end users and does not include on your lot sales or construction end loan sales. The consultant cannot warrant the accuracy of the data from this source.The consultant has segmented and amended the data based on market knowledge of the general market; however, no individual sales have been verified. The sales used from these sources reflect statistical trends, with larger samples of data providing a heavier weighting and smaller sample size results in less weighted percentage of the total market. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 32/36 RESTRICTION UPON DISCLOSURE AND USE The by-laws and Regulations of the Appraisal Institute govern disclosure of the contents of this report. Michael J. Timmerman, SRA is a Member of the Appraisal Institute. The by-laws and Regulations of the Institute require each Member and Candidate to control the use and distribution of each report signed by such Member. This market study report and the contents and data contained herein are confidential and are proprietary property of Fishkind &Associates, Inc. No reproductions of any sort or release of any proprietary information contained within may be released without prior written consent of Fishkind & Associates, Inc. Furthermore, neither all nor any part of this report shall be disseminated to the general public by use of advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media, or other media for public communication without prior written consent of the signatories of this report. This report is for internal use of GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, INC. exclusively. The undersigned agrees to the confidentiality agreement. This is copy number of ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 33/36 COPYRIGHT, TRADEMARK AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER Copyright This report published by RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC.hereby referred to as""THE REPORT'",including,but not limited to, text, graphics, photographs, graphs, illustrations, data, images, are protected by copyright law. Copyright © 2014 RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. All rights reserved. All materials provided by RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC.shall be used by the subscriber(the"User")only for the User's own authorized purposes,and may not be modified,published,reproduced in any manner,sold,distributed or in any way transferred to any person,corporation,organization,subsidiary or branch,in whole or in part,without the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. Possession of these materials does not carry with it the right of publication thereof or to use the name of in any manner without first obtaining the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC. No abstracting,excerpting,or summarization of these materials may be made without first obtaining the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC. These materials are not to be used in conjunction with any public or private offering of securities or other similar purpose where they may be relied upon to any degree by any person without first obtaining the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. These materials may not be used for purposes other than that for which they are prepared or for which prior written consent first has been obtained from RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC. Disclaimer THE INFORMATION IN"THE REPORT"IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KINi_r, r!i!yr-fr rxrts ti.6 O' 11Vrri,ir), fne mate+ialS anti ir"ilwiuiaiior piOviueii i i Inc iCrr'vci` ., RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. constitute raw data, factual materials and the opinions of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC. Neither RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC.nor any of its affiliates,employees or agents will have any liability of any kind to the user, subscriber or any employee, agent, or contractor of the subscriber or to any other person using the information and materials herein or for any error or omissions herein or for any opinions or conclusions expressed. Other than as set forth expressly herein,RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC.makes no warranties,expressed or implied concerning the accuracy of the materials or information provided herein. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 34/36 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE Your use of THE REPORT constitutes your agreement to be bound by these terms and conditions. THE REPORT is a service made available by RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. (the "COMPANY") and all content, information and definitions provided in and through the Housing Demand Report ("Information") may be used solely by you (the"User") under the following terms and conditions ("Terms of Use"): 1.) Subscription. As an authorized user of THE REPORT, User is granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable, revocable, limited license to access and use THE REPORT and Information in accordance with these Terms of Use. Company may terminate this subscription at any time for any reason. 2.) Limitations on Use. The Information in THE REPORT is for authorized use only and not for commercial exploitation. User may not decompile, disassemble, rent, lease, loan, sell, sublicense, copy or create derivative works from THE REPORT or the Information. User may not copy, modify, reproduce, republish, distribute, display, or transmit for commercial, nonprofit or public purposes all or any portion of THE REPORT, except to the extent authorized by the Company. Any unauthorized use of THE REPORT or its Information is prohibited. 3.) No Solicitation. In no event may any person or entity solicit any Users with data retrieved from this THE REPORT. 4.) Intellectual Property Rights. Except as expressly provided in these Terms of Use, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right, by implication, estoppel or otherwise, under copyright or other intellectual property rights. User agrees that the Information and THE REPORT are protected by copyrights,trademarks, service marks, patents or other proprietary rights and laws. For additional information see Copyright. 5.) Unlawful Activity. Company reserves the right to investigate complaints or reported violations of the Terms of Use and to take any action deemed appropriate including, but not limited to, reporting any suspected unlawful activity to law enforcement officials, regulators, or other third parties and disclosing any information necessary or appropriate to such persons or entities relating to user profiles,e-mail address, usage history, posted materials, IP addresses and traffic information. 6.) Remedies for Violations. Company reserves the right to seek all remedies available at law and in equity for violations of these Terms of Use including, but not limited to, the right to cancel THE REPORT. 7.) Modifications to Terms of Use. Company reserves the right to change these Terms of Use at any time. Updated versions of the Terms of Use will appear in THE REPORT and are effective immediately. User is responsible for regularly reviewing the Terms of Use. Continued use of THE REPORT after any such changes constitutes User's consent to such changes. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 35/36 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 36/36 Proposed Community Retail Center Growth Management Plan Amendment Commercial Needs Analysis Vincentian Mixed Use Sub District January 31, 2014 Updated July 31 , 2014 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples, LLC Prepared by: Michael J Timmerman, CRE, FRICS, SRA MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. 1415 Panther Lane Suite 428 Naples, Florida 34109 239-269-0769 ATTACHMENT "E" Contents 1.0 Introduction 2 1.1 Purpose 2 1.2 Overview of Needs Analysis 2 1.3 Definition of the Market Area and Target Population 3 1.4 Analysis Process 8 2.0 The Supply of Commercial Space 8 2.1 Project Primary Market 8 3.0 Proposed Amendment Impact on the Supply 14 4.0 Analysis of the Need for the Proposed Amendment to the Market 14 4.1 Overview 14 4.2 Demand for Coll merciai Space in the Projects Market Area and the Allocation Ratio 15 5.0 Conclusions 19 APPENDIX A 1 20 Retail Demand Methodology 20 1.0 Methodology 20 2.0 Aggregate Market - Retail Demand 20 APPENDIX A 2 26 APPENDIX A 3 27 1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose As we understand it, GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client") would like MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. ("Consultant") to prepare commercial needs analysis on the 31+/- acre site located on the south site of US 41 south in Collier County, FL. MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. ("Consultant") has been engaged to prepare this report. 1.2 Overview of Needs Analysis The process for determining the need for additional commercial square footage takes the form of a comparison of: The supply of existing and vacant land currently planned for various commercial uses; The demand for commercial square footage based on projected population/households in the market Historically, these comparisons have focused their studies County-wide. This analysis studies the market for commercial retail demand within a defined market area surrounding the site. There are two related reasons for this type of analysis. First, consumers are assumed to maximize benefit over all goods and services consumed subject to their income. This type of analysis requires that travel costs are either explicitly or implicitly accounted for during the consideration of the consumers' income constraint. This analysis requires the Consultant to narrow the scope of the analysis from the county level down to a local market level. Second, the Consultant considers whether the choice of location is a Pareto improvement for consumers. (Pareto improvement means that no consumers are made worse off, and at least one is made better off.) That is, the Consultant asks the question whether additional retail space makes at least one local market better off, without reducing the welfare of all others. An analysis of commercial retail space over the whole of a County may lead to the wrong conclusion of where to develop new space. That is, the county as a whole may appear to need more retail space to support the aggregate level of demand generated by its residents. This is precisely the outcome the County wants to avoid. Therefore: ■ By narrowing the focus of this study to the local market, the Consultant determines if this market has a need for additional retail space. The Consultant can replicate a competitive outcome, and ensure that the welfare of all other local markets is improved or unchanged. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 2 1.3 Definition of the Market Area and Target Population The site is a 31+!- acre parcel located at 11480 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113. The site is east of the City of Naples and across US 41 from Eagle Lakes County Park. The site is current classified as Vacant Residential and is located in the Urban Coast Fringe Future Land Use district. Located below is the information on the site from the Collier County Property Appraiser. PIN 00439880008 502632 ALTKEY 002.0005B32 ACRES_GIS 31.09 GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF O NAME1 NAPLES 2614 TAMI TRL O_NAME2 N STE 615 O_CITY NAPLES O_STATE FL O ZIPCODE 34103 11480 TrvMwvu i i.L S_ADDRESS E S_C rrY NA S_ZJPCODE 34113 SALE1_AMT $ 2,025,000 SALE1_YEAR 2010 SALE1_DATE 2010-11-02 SALE1_BK 4620 SALE1_PG 1385 SALE2_AMT $ 5,590,000 SALE2_YEAR 2010 SALE2_DATE 2010-01-21 SALE2_BK 4532 SALE2_PG 3068 SALE3_AMT $ 2,100,000 SALE3_YEAR 2004 SALE3_DATE 2004-05-20 SALE3_BK 3568 SALE3_PG 2789 LUSEDOR 00 LUSEDOR D Vacant Residential Located below is a map showing the regional location of the site and an aerial showing the surrounding uses. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 3 t.... :40 ,,r r..• ""'..\ Gq.e...■Gale1,4 Site Location within the region ....„-. 2 I C = Ff. 5 7.1 ...i .3.,•`,16 F. — I I _ Rad.Fia ,,,,,,,l9stl t ,_ _ Van cei.1 LO. • e — . . . '',.•V4 fi. ' ' •.: H....•nt...,.:.,I1 4.C‘01,CIU ::.4nt,Club 1 Owl:,6 ta q IM.k.....i. . , .....: a z 13 ..i. c.a: 2 t. i E .._ ,,,,,,,,,, ......:Ar•r. 14 ''`-','"'', :. 4t,•:::7,n t .; ..ttle•-r,aktflamriat,.F.t: , ••,.,„ •••.,,q■••A, .'''' • ,,,,, 'r, .,.,5-,,' F....• 7,,,, •'"".'' ' '. S.:.Fa,.K•r. , , I.:4 I.,,.• ‹,11 . -...,... • • H: 5.:••• . N. ,—.•, • ..1.. ,...:„.• .1. .. ‘,.,0 Pi s*.%.,. '' .4 .5,7,,3 5.•,,,,, L'A.:!-'-'c 'Mk... . 1 1 ' ,•••• ' •n.If Zlo. r.a..Y. . •• ...ie. er:41. ' g .. • -:.1leor.f.. 1 L7.. 73,n0 1$4,, 1.1.--,,e.'...e:;.- ,..1,"...1 91:' I-1,,y, f(c,..e.int e....; TOTOO Legend 7 ..Z.' III SubjectSite .. Enron:Esri,EIELerme.NAVTEC,UE,G5.leterreep,FC,NRCAN.Esri Japan, METI,E.sri China:Meng Kong),Esri IThapand).Terracm.2313 • ......■ ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 4 -4 43a"`' :� S *� .4',4-10',.'1 Ae na I View of site .w _ ...141; T $t1 A,r .114[ I rd+� 14 ; a t "� ,K % r,► ` �' '9: . t • i1 I. A 4 i 1-,. ' :, # ' ‘,..A.,,,i.ize, _ I.:A,0 1■ •,., , jt} , i 44,4 .4,if.0_4 g, 114 ' 1 ' e. _ -4.2. ....... : # 44..... ... ,_ __ rt,___!,_.�.,I ._, .31 _.� At t, a t,li.s •1- 4t]'a/f4 AhAt .r .e 40' ' J t F � � :$ y ., „,.....- I ' , . -, . : , , ., ,,,5 + �+ s f 5 .,,:"� . a '_y *tea r= '+• \ n• She► Yis.; i f +, 4- ■2.Je• 9 4 _ / ./....".„).._4- - - ... ,. :---.. ---4.7r-- ,-_,'# , -, '`, Q --' , - r ;Jam ' ii;� ■ i I ,� 1, J a r P - ii �� , WW > r ++e 'I r - ` - )• ! 1 -_ , u,,;, Legend . . A. isk 1 I SubjectSite �`� 0, ' _J },4 tri�la My d I n•, 91.E}"—y.S'Yrri#1.10, The site is surrounded on the west, south and east by residential housing and fronts on Tamiami Trail east. A review of the sites physical and functional attributes reveals that it is one of the largest vacant parcels with adequate functional utility to accommodate several types of commercial uses. These attributes were taken into consideration when selecting the primary trade area for commercial uses. The primary market area used for this ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 5 analysis was developed utilizing guidelines from the Urban Land Use Instituter based on the proposed volume of retail space. The primary market area is community serving in nature which is generally identified as a 15 minute drive time surrounding the site. Due to the sites larger size and it being one of the remaining sites of adequate functional utility to accommodate a wide array of commercial uses, we also included the City of Marco Island. The City of Marco has no sites large enough to accommodate a big box retailer or larger community center; therefore this market would be potential demand. In studies of this nature, we estimate the market capture for each drive time increment based on the premise that consumers will travel to sites more convenient than drive further to get to the same type of retail use. For this site, we prepared four net need calculations, based on the incremental need for a 5 minute drive time, the need between 5 and 10 minutes, the need between 10 and 15 minutes and a separate net need for Marco Island. Once the incremental net need calculation is complete, we apply a market capture rate for each increment to estimate the overall net need for the site community retail uses based on the tiered demand and supply. Located below is a map showing each drive time increment and the Marco Island area. ' Beyard, Michael D.,W. Paul O'Mara, et al. Shopping Center Development Handbook. Third Edition. Washington, D.C.: ULI-the Urban Land Institute, 1999. p.11 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 6 Day Primary Trade Area .12v 1,7 t 4 folder Ga. $12•IE , .?122,212 i East Naples apleS • ' - ER-r24 E 44,4* r a• Naples t!ganor kr, g S Vim Legend Mal GO0d1 5NlinDrivetime —.0.—New lOMinDrive N ew 15M inDrive ,•■••■•••N ew M arca SubjectSite Sri—roes:Earl,HEP.E.Cat acme,USGS.Intacinap.inn-errant F CCf;., s„.,,:fisri Japan.MEItEri China tHerii3Kang).E3ri;Thailand).Tcialtin, Macrnyindia.S 5 .4.-stnietblep.mnaitatcrs.and the GIS U sm•Cammunity • Estimates of existing and projected households and population for each drive time are provided for years 2014, 2019, 2025 and 2030 in Table 2. The population figures for the market area were obtained by ESRI Business Analyst and were used to derive households. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 7 1.4 Analysis Process Determining the need for additional retail land is a four-step process, as outlined below. Inventory current existing and vacant supply of commercial space in the market area; • Inventory parcels identified as potential commercial by the Collier County Future Land Use Map (FLUM); • Project future population/households to determine future commercial land needs and compare against commercial land allocation ratios; • Determine impact of amendment on land allocation ratio within the primary market area 2.0 The Supply of Commercial Space 2.1 Project Primary Market The analysis begins with the existing supply of commercial space in the primary market area. The primary market is community serving in nature as defined by the Urban Land Use Institute. For the purpose of this analysis we selected sites with more than 10 acres that had more than 100,000 sqft of leasable space. Each existing site included out parcels that had primary access from the larger parcel. Table 1 provides the current inventory of community-serving commercial space based on the distance from the site with attribute data obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser's (`PA') data. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 8 Table 1. Current Community-Service Inventory YEAR Dist Map ID PIN Center Name SITE ADDRESS SQFT HTD BUILT 5.00 1 81076000040 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP 6650 COLLIER BLVD 201,783 2007 5.00 3 '34520001005 FREEDOM SQUARE 12713 TAMIAMI TRL E 233,255 1994 5.00 4 00732840004 CORAL ISLE FACTORY SHOPS LTD 6060 COLLIER BLVD 148,656 1991 5.00 6 25368002589 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC 12730 TAMIAMI TRL E 223,755 2010 5.00 Total 807,449 10.00 7 61834840006 GULF GATE PLAZA 2900 TAMIAMI TRL E 208,208 1969 10.00 8 '00390080002 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP 3451 TAMIAMI TRL E 126,837 1993 10.00 9 28750000028 COURTHOUSE SHADOWS 3390 TAMIAMI TRL E 117,040 1987 10.00 11 -00391600009 TOWN CENTER 3903 TAMIAMI TRL E 289,673 1987 10.00 13 00390680004 HOME DEPOT USA INC 1663 AIRPORT RD S 110,800 2000 10.00 Total 852,558 15.00 2 '59712000488 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP 9885 COLLIER BLVD 203,652 2004 15.00 10 23945007103 BERKSHIRE COMMONS 7301 RADIO RD 132,912 1991 15.00 Total 336,564 Marco Island 12 56930960002 MARCO CENTER 1089 COLLIER BLVD N 110,596 1998 Grand Total 2,107,167 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser The :nirtesn properties abcIve ilave are wi nin tiie 00,600 sgirt lh eshoId and are consider competing supply to the potential uses on the site. These sites include the assembled large parcels that are improved with community serving retail uses, as well as the out parcels that are directly access from the larger improvement. Vacant sites with the potential for commercial development The next step in this analysis is to identify parcels within the market area that have similar functional utility to the subject site in order to estimate the potential commercial square footage that could be built on those sites. Located below we identified twelve sites that fall with the following parameters that could provide competing commercial space; • 10 Acres or more, and • Have frontage and access on a major roadway, and • Are currently classified as Vacant Commercial Land Use per the Collier County Property Appraiser, and / or • Are located within a FLU category that allows commercial development. Located below is a list of potential sites that have adequate functional utility and could be developed with commercial uses. These sites are also segregated by their location from the subject site. This is followed by a map showing the existing competing center and the potential development sites with a map reference. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 9 Table 2. Potential Community-Service Inventory Remaining �� Dist Map ID OWNER NAME PUD Name LAND USE CODE Appr SOFT 5 1 KRG 951&41 Ilc Tamiami Crossings Vacant Commercial 245,000 5 11 COLLIER LAND DEVELOPMENT INC Sable Bay Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural 146,876 5 14 NEW COMMUNITIES Lely Resort PUD 158,859 Total 5 Minute 650,735 10 15 NEW COMMUNITIES Hacienda Lakes PUD 327,000 Total 10 Minute 327,000 15 2 BC NAPLES INVESTMENTS LLP East Gateway Vacant Commercial 200,000 15 3 NEW HOPE MINSTRIES New Hope Minitries Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural 76,373 15 4 BENDERSON TR,RONALD 1-75 Alligator Alley PUD Vacant Commercial 258,249 15 5 VICTORIA ESTATES LTD ET AL Golden Gate Commerce Park Vacant Commercial 270,000 15 6 1-75 ASSOCIATES LLC Collier Blvd Mixed Use Vacant Commercial 270,000 15 7 DAVIS CROSSINGS VIII LLC ET AL 1-75 Collier Blvd Commerical Vacant Commercial 83,000 15 8 HIGHLAND PROP OF LEE&COLLIER Taormina Reserve Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural 262,000 15 9 STROHL FAMILY LLC Shopps at Santa Barbara Vacant Commercial 146,785 15 10 FFT SANTA BARBARA II LLC Freestate Vacant Commercial 134,427 15 12 ABERCIA,RALPH Forest Glen Vacant Commercial 100,000 15 13 NEW COMMUNITIES Fiddlers Creek PUD 300,000 Total 15 Minute 2,100,834 Total 2,978,569 The sites above are PUD's that include commercially approved square footage that would compete with the subject site. New Communities that are currently selling developer product are also included on this list. Fiddler's Creek and Hacienda Lakes have sites designated for commercial development in front of their communities. Lely Resort's square footage reflects the remaining approved for public use. Additional commercial square footage in Lely is approved, however it is reserved for community owner's only and is not available for public access. These sites would include the Players Club and the Ole' Town center within the Lely Resort DRI. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 10 tipples ri Primary Trade Area ,,...., ii • f.,,-.A xi,14.< ; t 2 t --.: t 'Ai Jil V ? I Golden flute _ .. ,., ■ .s. : .. • ., .!., „. 71 z E- I 2 4 -'------,_„ 3 1 n mor.,..---, ■.‘, ---r- ., ., ..., f .16.• w C.:mv....,.1. 14.,,,,,N-w.Illosyn-,VAI • A.,......• . . Naples Altmar .••••■ IA - . .■ e i 0 ' OW Legend , -r„-: -5M inDrivetime ,..._ ..........New Marco FinalRetailP rojectswOui-Par l•-r,:i..i.• ''''* -•,,,, MEVacantCommSites72714 `',...... r—iSubjectSite .,-- Srmrces -ri,HERE.Cel-ame.USGS, . map,Ina-En-silt P Cap.,N ROAR; ;IV pan.MET,Esti China lHeng Kara dft-i.,C1halland,l,TcmTcrn, •_.mylndia.S 0 penS ItrGettAap mrtibutors,aniiillz GIS User Canmundy • . ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 11 Primary Trade Area naves Manor 1'r y, r r a. a 4s. t. aa. .r: t,. �FrI .r:il ��ro-cu c Chant; i0 l 7z ,' er Legend Guadrend -SMinDrivetime -NewlOMinDrive - New 15MinDrive ±;.,y New Marco FnaIRetaiIProjectswOutPar 4�!:•n VacantC ont mS ites72714 ' SubjectSite Sources:Esri,HERE.CeLcrme,USGS.Intarmap.imam nt F Cap..I RCAN, Eiri Jaan•IsIETI.Esri China tkcng Kalg).Esri;Thaiand),TcmTcm, f•:ie�mjlndia.®OperStre Mapp ntnh tas,and the GIS User Ccmmumhj ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 12 The twelve existing centers have a combined total of 2,107,167 square feet of leasable space with 807,449 sqft located within 5 minutes, 852,558 sqft located between the 5 and 10 minute area, 336,564 sqft between the 10 and 15 minute area and 110,596 sqft on Marco Island. The fifteen vacant sites located in PUD's that have approved commercial square footage have a combined total of 2,978,569 sqft within the trade area. Within the 5 minute area there is a total of 550,735 sqft, between 5 and 10 minutes there are 327,000 sqft and between 10 and 15 minutes there are a total of 2,100,834 sqft. The large percentage of potential commercial square footage in the area between 10 and 15 minutes be due to the concentration of vacant commercial land surrounding the 1-75 and Collier Blvd interchange. The sum of the existing commercial square footage from Table 1 and the approved commercial square footage in the PUD's in Table 2 reflect the total square feet supply potential in the trade area. Located below is a summary of these retail supply categories. Table 3. Total Existing and Vacant Zoned Commercial segregated by Drive Time Market Area SQFT Pct of Total 5 Minute Existing 807,449 59% 5 Minute Potential 550,735 41% 5 Minute Total 1,358,184 10 Minute Existing 852,558 72% 10 Minute Potential 327,000 28% 10 Minute Total 1,179,558 15 Minute Existing 336,564 14% 15 Minute Potential 2,100,834 86% 15 Minute Total 2,437,398 Marco Island Existing 110,596 100% Marco Island Potential - Marco Island Total 110,596 This subtotal reflects the existing square footage of commercial space and the potential for new commercial space based the approved square footage in the active PUD. Located below is the summary of both the existing and potential for each market area in the study. Table 4. Market Area totals Status SQFT HTD Existing 2,107,167 Vacant Zoned Comm 2,978,569 Sub Total 5,085,736 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 13 3.0 Proposed Amendment Impact on the Supply If the proposed Project is approved, it could add 250,000 square feet to the inventory of commercial-retail land to the market area community-serving retail market. 4.0 Analysis of the Need for the Proposed Amendment to the Market 4.1 Overview As noted above, the need for amending the adopted Plan revolves around whether or not the market contains enough commercial land to provide a sufficient degree of flexibility to accommodate the future projected level of demand for commercial retail space. It must be demonstrated that the amount of land allocated in the market to community retail uses does not provide this level of flexibility in satisfying future demand. For this study, the supply of land with existing commercial retail development, the supply of vacant commercial designated land, and the supply of suitable lands designated by the Collier County FLUM as having the potential to be commercial were compared to the demand for community serving commercial retail land as generated by projected population/household growth in the market area. For this study we are using a market capture method to estimate the overall net need for the subject market area. In order to do this, we prepared market area population forecast and demand for commercial square footage forecast for each of the four drive time markets. Each drive time market area was analyzed independently in order to derive a net need for the primary market area in total. Located below are the results of each drive time analysis. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 14 4.2 Demand for Commercial Space in the Project's Market Area and the Allocation Ratio In order to estimate the demand for commercial service, we need to estimate the population for the market area. This population estimate is based on data obtained from ESRI and is supplemented by the housing unit count from the Collier County Property Appraiser's data for July 2014. The Consultant also used an allocation factor in determining the demand for commercial retail space in the market area. The appropriate factor depends on a number of issues including the nature and speed of development in the market area, as well as the degree to which population forecasts are subject to error. The former Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") endorsed a factor of 1.25 for these kinds of analyses. While the appropriate level for the allocation ratio was still subject to debate at time DCA was dismantled, the Consultant has applied a factor of 1.25 in this study in order to remain conservative. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage or demand required in relation to the directly utilized acreage or demand to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land. The additional acreage or demand is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands will not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon, or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed. 5 Minute Drive time Table 5. Market Area Population Forecast 5 Minute TA 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 Trade Area Population 14,169 14,896 20,495 23,151 24,571 TA HH Size 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.84 TA HHs 4,988 5,288 7,215 8,150 8,650 TA Avg HH Income $59,610 $67,092 $88,237 $107,354 $130,613 Source: ESRI Table 6. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for 5 Minute TA 5 Minute Drive 2014 . 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 239,989 430,646 591,845 764,246 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio(sqft) 299,986 538,307 739,806 955,307 Vacant Supply (sqft) 0 100000 200000 550,735 Existing Supply (sqft) 807449 807449 807449 807449 Net Need(sqft) (507,463) (369,142) (267,643) (402,877) ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 15 Between 5 and 10 Minute trade area _ Table 7. Market Area Population Forecast 10 Minute TA 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 Trade Area Population 29,611 30,830 36,205 39,418 42,233 TA HH Size 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 TA HHs 13,188 13,772 16,125 18,250 20,254 TA Avg HH Income $62,801 $70,683 $84,399 $97,842 $113,426 Source: ESRI Table 8. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for 10 Minute TA Between 5 and 10 Min Drive 2014 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 658,482 920,597 1,207,866 1,554,007 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio(sqft) 823,102 1,150,747 1,509,833 1,942,509 Vacant Supply (sqft) 0 100000 200000 327,000 Existing Supply (sqft) 852558 852558 852558 852558 Net Need (sqft) (29,456) 198,189 457,275 762,951 Between 10 and 15 Minute Trade area Table 9. Market Area Population Forecast 15 Minute TA 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 Trade Area Population 49,418, 50,634 60,701 66,087 70,808 TA HH Size 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 TA HHs 20,002 22,544 24,569 26,457 28,450 TA Avg HH Income $64,408 $72,492 $86,559 $100,346 $116,328 Source: ESRI Table 10. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for 15 Minute TA Between 10 and 15 Min Drive 2014 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 1,105,480 1,438,569 1,795,849 2,238,709 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio(sqft) 1,381,850 1,798,211 2,244,812 2,798,387 Vacant Supply (sqft) - 250,000 500,000 2,100,834 Existing Supply (sqft) 336,564 336,564 336,564 336,564 Net Need (sqft) 1,045,286 1,211,647 1,408,248 360,989 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 16 Marco Island Drive time Table 11. Market Area Population Forecast Marco TA _ 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 Trade Area Population 18,599 18,930 22,330 24,986 27,757 TA HH Size 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 TA HHs 9,371 9,578 11,251 12,589 13,985 TA Avg HH Income $102,222 $115,052 $137,378 $159,259 $184,624 Source: ESRI Table 12. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for Marco TA Marco Island 2014 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 745,417 1,045,536 1,356,204 1,746,556 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio(sqft) 931,771 1,306,920 1,695,255 2,183,195 Vacant Supply (sqft) - - - - r •.,a:.._,. C -nI. ( rif+\ 1 1 n FOR 1 in cQFi 110 59A 1 in ccA INet Need(sqft) 821,175 1,196,324 1,584,659 2,072,599 The information above is the basis for estimating the market demand for community retail uses within the 5 minute drive time area and between 5 and 10 minutes, 10 and 15 minutes and Marco Island. This forecast information indicates that the market's demand for commercial space will increase in relation the population within each drive _ time area. The data from ESRI does not accurately forecast the number of housing units in an area of rapid growth life the trade area. In these cases we supplemented the ESRI households with an estimate of finished units in the newly developing communities. The 5 minute trade area household count was increased by 1,500 units in 2020 to account for the addition of 500 households in Treviso Bay and 1,000 households in Isles of Collier Preserve. By 2025, it is anticipated that Treviso Bay will be built out, however the Isles at Collier Preserve, will still be marketing. Using the same absorption rate, we increased the 2025 households by 600, which would account for the remaining units in Isles of Collier Preserve. The 10 minute trade area household count was increased by 1,000 units in 2020, 760 in 2025 to account for the addition of new units within Hacienda Lakes. This community has approval for the development of 1,760 homes of which we are accounting for the build out within our forecast window. Naples Reserve also falls into the 10 minute drive time. This community is approve for 1,157 units and marketing is expected to commence in 2015. In order to account for these units, we increased the 2020 household count by 750 and the 2025 household count by the remaining 407 units. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 17 The Consultant has developed a retail demand model to project the demand for retail space based on the number of households and their income and demographic characteristics within each of the drive time areas. The documentation for the model is rather voluminous. This methodology is reproduced here in Appendix A2. Growth management practices suggest that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the commercial allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developing area and the area's general exposure to growth trends in the market. Table 13 summaries the market capture from each of the trade area commercial net need calculations presented above.The market capture percentages are reflective of the portion of the market that this sites retail uses could reasonable expect to capture. Depending of the type of use of tenant at the site, these capture rates will vary. Located below is our estimate of market capture for each drive time trade area. Table 13. Net Need Market Capture for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. Distance Market Capture 2014 2019 2025 2030 5 Minute Drive 50% (253,732) (184,571) (133,821) (201,438) 10 Minute Drive 20% (5,891) 39,638 91,455 152,590 15 Minute Drive 10% 104,529 121,165 140,825 36,099 Marco Island 20% 164,235 239,265 316,932 414,520 Total 9,141 215,496 415,390 401,771 We assume that 50% of the 5 minute trade area will visit the sites retail uses. This is based on the fact the most convenient retail uses will capture the largest share of the market. The site is estimated to capture 20% of the 10 minute trade area due to easy access and visibility on US 41. The low market capture rate for the 15 minute trade is reflective of the abundance of vacant commercial land surrounding the 1-75 interchange and the amount of alternative centers in the trade area. As noted in the 15 minute net need analysis, over 2,100,000 square feet of vacant commercial land is potential competition to the subject site, however, over 1,100,000 square feet is located at the 1-75 interchange and is significantly influenced by interstate drive by traffic. Because of these factors, we limited to the market capture for this area to 10 percent. Marco Island is outside the normal 15 minute drive time, however due to its limited land for new commercial development and its access near the subject site, it is included in our analysis. I estimated the market capture of Marco Island to be 20%, which accounts for the current net need estimated from our analysis. The growth of the island and its lack of available sites for community serving retail uses currently pushes the demand off the island and into our general trade area. The future growth of the island will result in the more visits to the 5 minute trade area surrounding the subject site. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 18 As shown by Table 13, using the market capture estimated for each drive time and Marco Island, the net need in the horizon year of 2030 is estimated at 401,771 sqft of community based retail. Based on this analysis, there is a clear and compelling case for adding additional land with community-serving commercial use to this market. The demand for additional square footage in this market exceeds the potential for the subjects 31 +1- acre site. 5.0 Conclusions Taking into account all developed, vacant and potential commercial land in the market; there are currently insufficient lands designated for commercial uses to provide a reasonable degree of market flexibility in accommodating community serving retail uses within the primary market area. Demand from households east of the market area in Goodland, Port of the Isles and Everglades City, further add to this need. i i;s su:3ject 3i v 16 �..7 vv .v vv.—; vvJ.1:1:Ura ..:....«.... f .,......:.`....:a! space `.'nd is the only site of adequate functional utility to allow for flexible development. The location provides the access and visibility that is required for this type of development. The under-allocation of suitable commercial property supports the need for this additional commercial acreage. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 19 APPENDIX A 1 Retail Demand Methodology 1.0 Methodology The methodology employed in the analysis of the demand for retail space at this site is based on a consumer expenditures model. This model can estimate the aggregate market demand for retail space, the demand for retail space at a specific location, and the effective supply of competing retailers in the area. The net demand for retail space at the location being studied is determined as the difference between the site demand and the effective supply of competition. 2.0 Aggregate Market e Retail Demand MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. utilized a model to determine retail demand. This model estimates retail demand by square footage, shopping center type and store type. These sources are census based (ESRI) local area households and household income data, consumer expenditure profiles from the U.S. Department of Labor Consumer Expenditure Survey, Department of Revenue Gross Sales data, and Urban Land Institute shopping center tenant profiles, square footage requirements and average sales per square foot by store type from the publication Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers. The model operates by first determining retail household expenditures for market area households. Expenditures are determined through application of the results of the Consumer Expenditure Survey, conducted by the U.S. Department of Labor. This survey of over 30,000 households nationwide provides detailed information on average dollar expenditure amounts and the expenditure percent of household income, for all household expenditures. The income expenditure percentages are applied to the average local area household income and multiplied by the number of households to determine market area spending potential for retail store goods. Next, the historic Department of Revenue (DOR) Sales data (for the county in question) is indexed by tenant classification2, from the Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers. The expected expenditures on retail goods are then applied to this county specific (DOR) index to determine an estimate of spending by major store type (tenant classification). The determination of sales by retail center (neighborhood, community, regional, super-regional) is determined through the construction of an index of surveyed sales by center type (also located in the Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers). 2 Tenant Classification are: general merchandise, food, food service, clothing and accessories, shoes, home furnishings, home appliances/music, building materials and hardware, automotive, hobby/special interest, gifts/specialty,jewelry, liquor, drugs, other retail, personal services, entertainment/community. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 20 Supportable square feet of a retail center is determined by applying the average sales per square foot of GLA, found in Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, to the expected sales by store type (tenant classification). In addition to determining the supportable square feet -- of retail space, MJT Realty Economic Advisors has determined the expected sales by DOR retail classification, which is a subset of the individual store types (tenant classifications). Provided below are income and expenditure data used in the analysis for each of the four trade areas in this report. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 21 5 Minute Drive Time Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail.for Year HHs AVG HH Income Income % Retail 2014 5,288 $67,092 $354,780,276 36.50% $129,480,164 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;U.S Census;Collier Comprensive Planning Dept.;Bureau of Labor Statistics Source:Fishkind&Associates, Inc;U.S.Census Bureau;Bureau of Labor Statistics Source:Fishkind&Associates, Inc;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008-Urban Land Institute DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) I%)Allocation 2014 Expenditures 1$) GENERAL MERCHANDISE 14.48% $18,743,999 FOOD 15.27% $19,765,409 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% $13,892,760 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES 4.48% $5,797,860 SHOES 0.37% $484,276 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% $9,194,939 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC 3.67% $4,756,492 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARD' 11.73% $15,188,530 AUTOMO11VE 23.35% $30,233,996 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL GIFT/SPECIALTY 1.86% $2,413,209 JEWLERY 0.56% $730,220 LIQUOR WITH FOOD SERVICE WITH FOOD SERVICE DRUGS 0.87% $1,123,621 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $1,860,016 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $895,891 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $4,398,948 TOTAL $129,480,164 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue; Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT-COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED$/SF SQFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 7,999 FOOD $350.38 34,825 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 20,865 CLOTHING 8 ACCESSORIES $232.68 2,516 SHOES $192.73 294 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 18,567 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC $302.20 3,561 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 36,959 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 88,423 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 3,931 JEWLERY $288.20 81 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 1,289 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 1,820 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 2,181 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 16,679 TOTAL 239,989 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 22 Between 5 and 10 Minute Drive Time Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail.for Year HHs AVG NH Income Income %s Retail 2014 13,772 $70,683 $973,447,361 36.50% $355,268,127 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;US Census,Collier Comprehensive Planning,Bureau of Labor. DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) (%)Allocation 2014 Expenditures MI GENERAL MERCHANDISE 14.48% $51,429,849 FOOD 15.27% $54,232,398 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% $38,119,002 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES 4.48% $15,908,189 SHOES 0.37% $1,328,757 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% $25,229,107 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC 3.67% $13,050,879 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWAR 11.73% $41,674,342 AUTOMOTIVE 23.35% $82,956,143 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL GIFT/SPECIALTY 1.86% $6,621,372 JEWLERY 0.56% $2,003,580 LIQUOR i WITH FOOD SERVICE i WITH FOOD SERVICE I DRUGS 0.87% $3,082,995 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $5,103,518 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $2,458,148 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $12,069,848 TOTAL $355,268,127 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT—COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED$/$F SQFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 21,948 FOOD $350.38 95,553 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 57,249 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES $232.68 6,903 SHOES $192.73 807 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 50,944 HOME APPIJANCES/MUSIC $302.20 9,770 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 101,409 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 242,616 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 10,785 JEWLERY $288.20 221 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 3,536 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 4,993 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 5,983 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 45,764 TOTAL 658,482 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 23 Between 10 and15 Minute Drive Time Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail,for Year HHs AVG HH Income Income % Retail 2014 22,544 $72,492 $1,634,254,495 36.50% $596,435,469 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;US Census,Collier Comprehensive Planning,Bureau of Labor. DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) (%)Allocation 2014 Expenditures($) GENERAL MERCHANDISE 14.48% $86,342,072 FOOD 15.27% $91,047,081 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% $63,995,398 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES 4.48% $26,707,175 SHOES 0.37% $2,230,760 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% $42,355,429 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC 3.67% $21,910,232 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE 11.73% $69,964,215 AUTOMOTIVE 23.35% $139,269,420 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL GIFT/SPECIALTY 1.86% $11,116,171 JEWLERY 0.56% $3,363,674 LIQUOR WITH FOOD SERVICE WITH FOOD SERVICE DRUGS 0.87% $5,175,831 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $8,567,948 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $4,126,818 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $20,263,245 TOTAL $596,435,469 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT-COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED 8/SF SQFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 36,848 FOOD $350.38 160,417 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 96,112 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES $232.68 11,589 SHOES $192.73 1,355 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 85,526 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC $302.20 16,401 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 170,249 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 407,311 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 • 18,107 JEWLERY $288.20 372 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 5,936 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 8,383 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 10,044 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 76,831 TOTAL 1,105,480 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 24 Marco Island _ Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail.for Year _ HHs AVG HH Income Income % Retail 2014 _ 9,578 $115,052 $1,101,965,772 36.50% $402,172,045 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;US Census,Collier Comprehensive Planning,Bureau of Labor. DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) Viol Allocation 2014 Expenditures 1$) GENERAL.MERCHANDISE 14.48% $58,219,823 FOOD 15.27% $61,392,376 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% _ $43,151,626 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES _ 4.48% $18,008,451 SHOES 0.37% $1,504,185 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% _ $28,559,954 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC _ 3.67% $14,773,908 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE 11.73% $47,176,355 AUTOMOTIVE 23.35% $93,908,344 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL }Fr/eDEr:!A}-Ty 9 Ro/ t7 495 552 JEWLERY U.56% $2,268,101 LIQUOR _ WITH FOOD SERVICE WITH FOOD SERVICE DRUGS 0.87% $3,490,025 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $5,777,304 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $2,782,683 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $13,663,357 TOTAL $402,172,045 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT-COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED S/SF SOFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 _ 24,846 FOOD $350.38 108,168 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 64,807 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES $232.68 7,814 SHOES $192.73 914 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 57,670 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC $302.20 11,059 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 114,798 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 274,647 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 12,209 JEWLERY $288.20 251 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 4,003 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 5,653 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 6,773 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 51,806 TOTAL 745,417 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 25 APPENDIX A 2 Collier County Future Land Use Map R 25 E 11 26 E R 27 E i R 21 E 1 R 29 E ' R 30 1 R 91 E R 32 E : II 33 E : R 34 E i 2012—2025 ... ,.. tbzubi camp.non ..........ww.., “„„,..,,„,,,,,,,w,, — FUTURE LAND USE MAP --_ - CI wsialis o...swil_ow. -4 WIWI.COWIty Florida --... --, '- 13 Iltr74.T.Itl.‘.„., . 0 .....c ....;....WI.0.1.1.,ow 2 2 ......nil FLU OVERLAY Mew Arte SOW. . ...1.1.W.I.ko ura M.... ; •....=.4V.Iew,..=-.... W....W!..... .- ..1.1.11....11.1.1.1.•/........1. • _ we www,......,.......twa:-...4„ „ .,,....f,,,,;,„.,, Ailf......1/..1.M./400W 0.3.1.YAP. — -1 ..... is,...,. ,._ •ii.X.M....t..15.2*1'''....`....' —..'''''..-'.............. •..f...T.witr,w-w, .. •;:=11.2.:4.. El:=1'.. ..., ,.,..3,--- —- 1 ` —-' ! •Wr•......7.....a. , el;7.-V1.^..::;-!:■'"--""' ,,,..r.,...,..,..,,, , ....../u./WA. . , : ■...„."/......,/ - ....;,...,e.,.,4-7.41.7=';....r.,..;wt... I ...t.-. -i -...;;;,0'. -; •........:.':-.1..'41.42.° 7.....m.......Nu.wa tonact ."..'IA:4g..r.1,..■. . -7 ...7..., ,__......- - .,-. if';.-'.z : 7 II r.-r,:.=.°""‘" ••••=71%.,-.. - .i ci........=mat 0....'.'....' 1 1 0........... — 771:1: : , . tal.";,....1=;‘■...we,. ' I li..,...... ',if, / '■ ' IPA= .fi 1 11 .. ?.?7," i i • AA...- t , ____.• lip.r... . , - . . ... -,,.. ',I i .,1.' :. • 1 1 ., ,,..,_..................._____. v %. I I ,..------ -I- ....,--------; ---.-..... '. ... ....... i C... 2.'4• ' ..1.'".. ) ---;--1 -.7.--t-.-",F,' I I .... ........ I ....A......1_........-....;-1 ...we 7•:,-,...... I I . •tr. , ■..,fi'k t,',.,S,7 _.,>'.;=:•:'----7.--_:_--i. -.. .77.: .- , =•-:-....'" III C I!i ':,•'••,,, :;,..., ,-_.. —,......,..••■•-.,..F.:..0,...- ,.. I ..'?,.l.:-W-it,•''''1 ;-..=',.•„, :.:•:,....,C.. ._. .tf:-. .1.,-,....,-- ',,..i;, >Itt, -ft-.:,----_-7— ▪ ..-; ,t.1 -,.., • -:;,,:-—, ..=,•---•.' b ITC, ;' '...:,.g. ',,....', :-.="1.,11-_-_ '...'"0 ' ...,'Z.. - _... .L.,...1 -----sw-.......... , II ..- -k.-,1.: :,... — ____ --;., ; RC.Cr.M .w. — .01,../.. .. .1) ........ 1 ' -0.... ,-.... ' wl ,......... T....L.=... ...S.4..c... .-N. 2 ,./... 1 .. i I ,.. ,r4P:,.--L ,..., . .' '----- I ■ .•,..■ -..,”•,,,,ft LAY.,7 k...../.... „L. ....,...s.A.} ,;.....: ..t,-:_ :•-.I,N...(.1:i-V67g,:?..-.:u.:. '''''', .t..,• .--'--------- ,_1 ..1 — . IS' -1-.;.? ',•.:4.4-4.,147-;), -"_)A.‘-,.`?.,-- .:':•;:.:::::-:i..1.,Fi,"..i..-..7.---- .--,•:::,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,......1.,,,,4 j.........k.,5. i ...,.1. ...,...V..........'......f...; z;.... : N ... J R 25 E j R 28 E ' 1218 I R 28 E I R 23 E 7 R 30 E t R 31 E i R 32 E i R 33 E , 1341 . . . ...---. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 26 APPENDIX A 3 ESRI Demographic Summary i =f ) esrr Demographic and Income Profile Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:5 minute radius Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 Population 14,1.69 1.4,896 16,021 Households 4,988 5,288 5,746 Families 3,569 3,758 4.055 Average Household Size 2.82 2.80 2.77 Owner Occupied Housing Units 3,723 3,738 4,035 Renter Occupied Housing Units 1,265 1,549 1,711 Median Age 39.6 41.7 44.2 Trends:201.4-2019 Annual Rate Area State National Population 1.47% 1.06% 0.73% Households 1.63% 1-06% 0.75% Families 1.53% 0.95% 0.66% Owner HHs 1.54% 0.93% 0.69% Median Household Income 3.86% 3.16% 2.74% 2014 2019 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 685 13.0% 680 11.8% ono __._ _ 622 1,050ti- $25,000-$34,999 619 12.1% 73., 12.2% $35,000-$49,999 875 16.5% 983 17.1% $50,000-$74,999 84$ 16,0% 1,083 18.8% $75,000-$99,999 526 9.9% 703 12.2% 5100,000-$149,999 404 7.6% 497 8.6% 5150,000-$199,999 152 2.9% 232 4.0% $200,000+ 171 3.2% 246 4.3% Median Household Income $39,486 $47,725 Average Household Income $59,610 169,555 Per Capita Income $21,285 525,123 Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent T� 0-4 992 7.0% 990 6.6% 1,032 6,4% 5-9 1,028 7.3% 1,015 6.8% 1,033 6.4% 10-14 926 6.5% 941 6.3% 963 6.0% 15-19 989 7.0% 868 5.8% 883 5.5% 20-24 745 5.3% 855 5.7% 734 4.6% 25-34 1,650 11.6% 1,694 11.4% 1,805 11.3% 35-44 1,690 11-9% 1,618 10.9% 1,690 1.0.5% 45-54 1,619 11.4% 1,663 11.2% 1,655 10.3% 55-64 1,544 10.9% 1,817 12.2% 2,121 13.2% 65-74 1,708 12.1% 1,983 13.3% 2,405 15.0% 75-84 1,001 7.1% 1,121 7.50/o 1,316 8.2% 68+ 276 1.9% 328 2.2% 382 2.4% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 9,885 69.8% 10,207 68.5°10 10,729 67.0% Black Alone 2,215 15.6% 2,470 16.6% 2,865 17.9% American Indian Alone 76 0.5% 80 0.5% B9 0.6% Asian Alone 89 0.6% 111 0.7% 145 0.9% Pacific Islander Alone 5 0.0% 6 0.0% 7 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 1,559 11.0% 1,660 11.1% 1,797 11.2% Two or More Races 339 2.4% 362 2.4% 390 2.4% Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 6,023 42.5% 6,307 42.3% 6,865 42.9% Data Note:Income is expressed in current dollars. Source;11,5.Census Bureau,Census 20 t0 Summary y file 1, Isd forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 27 /aitz-) �S1 �• . Demographic and Income Profile Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 " Drive Time 5 minute radius - -- -00.1.22145 Trends 2014-2019 3.5- 13 ai 3- a a2.5- C 2- a) 1.5- 1 h :6 1 !Area !State 0.5 USA 0 Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income Population by Age 14- 12- 10- V a 6- • ! 2014 2_ Ii . 2019 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race 615K-524K 65 1250-$340 _ _ 15.3% 60 15.5% _ 55 <915K 50 13.0% 45 c 40 v 35 szoty. a 30 935K-s491 3.2% 25 16.5% 5150K-51990 20 2.9% $100K-9149K 15 7.6% 10 $500-1740 5751<-0990 5 16.0% 9.9% 0 '1 White Black Am.Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:42.3% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary Ale 1. Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 28 • esri' Demographic and Income Profile vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 - - • Drive Time:10 minute radius "'' •`' -'`'` Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 Population 43,780 45,726 48,797 Households 18,176 19,060 20,488 ramifies 11,596 12,095 12,942 Average Household Size 2,32 2.32 2.31 Owner Occupied Housing Units 12,935 12,852 13,730 Renter Occupied Housing Una 5,241 6,20E 6,757 Median Age 47.7 50.0 52.3 Trends.2014-2039 Annual Rate Area State National Population 1.31% 1.06% 0.73% Households 1.46% 1.06% 0.75% Families 1.36% 0.95% 0.66% Owner tills 1.33% 0.93% 0.69% Median Household Income 3.90% 3.16°! 2.74% 2014 2019 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <515,000 2,286 12.0% 2,223 10.9% - 7.27.7 10 o% $25,000-$34,999 2,672 14.0% 2,255 11.2% 535,000-$49,999 3,160 16.6% 3,403 16.6% $50,000-$74,999 3,125 16,49(° 3,816 1.8.6% $75,000•599,999 2,023 10.6% 2,702 132% $100,000-$149,999 1,606 8.4% 1,999 9.8°/, $150,000-5199,999 527 2.8°/u 785 3.S% 5200,000+ 749 3.9% 1,027 5.0% Median Household Income $41,593 550,367 Average Household Income $62,801 573,730 Per Capita Income $26,477 631,121 Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ,..---•■ 0-4 2,383 5.4% 2,343 5.1% 2,423 5.0% 5-9 2,266 5.2% 2,337 5.1% 2,359 4.9% 10-14 2,023 4.6% 2,077 4.5% 2,234 4.6% 15-19 2,192 5.0% 2,020 4.4% 2,104 4.3% 20-24 2,212 5.1% 2,324 5.1°/n 2,111 4.3% 25-34 4,778 10.9% 4,851 10.6% 4,927 10.1% 35-44 4,651 10.6% 4,543 9.9% 4,696 9.6% 45-54 5,039 11.5% 5,011 11.0% 4,883 10.0% 55-64 5,792 13.2% 6,235 13.6% 7,083 14.5% 65-74 6,608 15.1% 7,537 16.5% 8,755 17.9% 75-84 4,377 10.0% 4,673 10.2% 5,260 10.8% 85+ 1,461 3.3% 1,774 3.9% 1,954 4.0% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 34,664 79.2% 35,484 77.6% 36,882 75.6% Black Alone 4,626 10.6% 5,261 11.5% 6,264 12.8°/n American Indian Alone 191 0.4% 203 0.4% 225 0.5% Asian Alone 342 0.8% 427 0.9% 559 1.1% Pacific Islander Alone 15 0.0% 17 0-0% 19 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 3,068 7.0% 3,369 7.4% 3,775 7.7% Two or More Races 874 2.0% 965 2.1% 1,074 2.2% Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 12,517 28.6% 13,495 29.5% 15,193 31.1% Data Note:Income C eirprnsed in current ddtnn_ Source-.U.S.Census Dread,Census 2010 Summary file 1. Esd forecasts for 2014 and 2019. • July 30,2014 • ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 29 ....._. ° esri Demographic and Income Profile Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 -_---- -- _--- Drive Time:10 minute radius rc.>.: -'-i ii'..-i Trends 2014-2019 i 3.5- c U 3- `m n-2.5- c c 2- 1 ce 1.5- 1- II h 1 ■Area c •State Q 0.5 USA 0 Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income Population by Age 16- 14- 12- m 10- u a`i 8- i 6- 4 '' _ N 2014 2 I liii! ' ; 2019 .-� 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race 615K-624K_25K•534K 15.3% 14.0% 64615K 12.0% 1., $35K-549K c 16.6% U;:i'. { s2coKn °3.9%6150K-0199K z.8%6100K-5149K 8.4%550K-674K 16.4% 975K•099K _� r x1 10-6% White Black Am.Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:29,5% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 • ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 30 • •l ) esri" Demographic and Income Profile Vincentian 243 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:15 minute radius Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 Population 93,198 96,360 102,213 Households 40,178 41,604 44,296 Families 25,514 26,209 27,718 Average Household Size 2,27 2.27 2.26 Owner Occupied Housing Units 27,931 27,289 28,927 Renter Occupied Housing Units 12,247 14,315 15,369 Median Age 48.4 50.3 52.0 Trends:2014-2019 Annual Rate Area State National Population 1.19% 1.06% 0.73% Households 1.26% 1.06% 0.75% Families 1.13% 0.95% 0.66% Owner HHs 1.17% 0.93% 0.69:6 Median Household is icome 3.61% 3.16% 2.74% 2014 2019 Householda by Income Number Percent Number Percent <515,000 4,552 10.9% 4,350 9.8% $15,000-$24,999 5,886 14.1% 4,417 10.0% $25,000-$34,999 5,618 13.5% 4,732 10.7% $35,000-$49,999 7,012 16.9% 7,380 16.7% 454,040-$74,994 7.256 17.4% 8,613 19.4% $75,100-555,999 4 553 11.0% 6,059 53.I% $100,000-$149,999 3,914 9.4% 4,878 11.0% $150,000-$199,999 1,214 2.9% 1,736 3.9% $200,000+ 1,588 3.8% 2,101 4.7% Median Household Income $43,982 552,525 Average Household Income $64,408 575,121 Per Capita Income $28,010 $32,690 Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 5,011 5.4% 4,892 5.1% 5,069 5.0°! 5-9 4,685 5.0% 4,970 5.2% 5,053 4.9% 10-14 4,258 4.6% 4,370 4.5% 4,861 4.8% 15-19 4,398 4.7% 4,113 4.3% 4,344 4.2% 20-24 4,412 4.7% 4,506 4.7% 4,166 4.1°!° 25-34 10,008 10.7% 10,144 10.5% 10,202 10.0% 35-44 10,001 10.7% 9,765 10.1°!° 10,087 9.9°.'0 45.54 11,096 11.9% 10,949 11.4% 10,577 10.3% 55-64 12,625 13.5% 13,319 13.8°10 14,875 14.6% 65-74 14,326 15.4% 15,678 16.3% 17,719 17.3% 75-84 9,443 10.1% 10,009 10.4% 11,148 10.9% 85+ 2,937 12% 3,643 3.8% 4,113 4.0% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Atone 76,432 82.0% 77,457 80.4% 80,125 78.4% Black Alone 8,525 9.1% 9,669 10.0% 11,488 11.2% American Indian Alone 357 0.4% 384 0.4% 433 0.4% Asian Alone 973 1.0% 1,201 1.2°70 1,554 1.5% Pacific Islander Alone 34 0.0% 42 0.0°!a 49 0.0% Same Other Race Alone 5,100 5.5% 5,622 5.8% 6,334 6.2% Two or More Races 1,778 1.9% I,965 2.1% 2,229 2.2% Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 23,935 25.7% 26,070 27.1% 29,708 29.1% Dar,Note:Intone is expressed in current dollars. Source:U.S.Census&ueau,Census 2010 Summary Ate 1. Csit forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 31 • �. : { esr � Demographic and Income Profile Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 _-- Drive Time:15 minute radius -• .. Trends 2014-2019 3.5- c 3- a V 0) 2.5- 0 2 0) A 1.5- 1Q 1- ■Area State 0,5- USA 0 Population Households Families Owner HHS Median HH Income Population by Age 16- 14- 12- c lo- 6-- ' 2014 2 I liii 2019 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race 80 920K-534K 915K-524K 13.5% r 14.1% 70 60 .5515K 53SK-549K : 10.9% 4-„, 50 16.9% C o 40 ti til $200K+ 0..3.8% 30 5150K-5199K 2.9% 20 5100K-5149K 10 550K-3745 9.4% 17.4% o e F'7 975K•$995 11.0% White Black Am.Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:27.1% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary Fie 1. Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 32 n- Demographic and Income Profile Polygon Marco island Area:49.84 square miles - ' Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 Population 18,599 18,930 19,864 Households 9,371 9,578 10,077 Families 6,336 6,413 6,690 Average Household Size 1.98 1.98 1.97 Owner Occupied Housing Units 7,958 7,879 8,277 Renter Occupied Housing Units 1,413 1,699 1,800 Median Age 63.0 64.5 65.5 Trends:2014-2019 Annual Rate Area State National Population 0.97% 1.06% 0.73% Households 1.02% 1.06% 035% Families 0.85% 0.95% 0,66% Owner HHs 0.99% 0.93% 0.69% Median Household income 3.32% 3.16% 2.74% 2014 2019 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 703 7.3% 609 6.0% $15,000.524,999 776 8.1% 524 5.2% $25,000-$34,999 882 9.2% 667 6.6% $$35,000-$49,999 1,134 11.8% 1,074 10.7% A CUM 1.576 16.5% 1.701 16.9% $7$,000-$99,999 1,183 72.4°! 1,a70 14.6% $100,000-$149,999 1,605 16.8% 1,572 18.6% $150,000-$199,999 644 6.7% 825 8.2% $200,000+ 1,074 11.2% 1,333 13.2% Median Household Income $69,081 $81,349 Average Household Income $102,222 $121,958 Per Capita Income $51,371 561,455 . Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 393 2.1% 354 1.9°/a 374 1.9% 5-9 504 2.7% 478 2.5% 476 2.4% 10-14 546 2.9% 518 2.7% 528 2.7% 15-19 523 2.8% 472 2.5% 473 2.4% 20-24 419 2.3% 402 2.1% 369 1.9% 25-34 880 4.7% 917 4.8% 888 4.50/a 35-44 1,165 6.3% 1,080 5.7% 1,205 6.1°.'° 45-54 2,176 11,7% 1,893 10.0% 1,648 8,3% 55-64 3,521 18.9% 3,423 18.1% 3,680 18.5% 65-74 4,819 25.9% 5,081 26.8% 5,359 27.0% 75-84 2,908 15.6% 3,341 17.7% 3,715 18.7% 85+ 747 4.0% 968 5.1% 1,146 5.8% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 17,733 95.3% 17,899 94.6% 18,583 93.6% Black Alone 184 1.0% 217 1.1% 271 1.4% American Indian Alone 24 0.1% 25 0.1°/a 30 0.2% Asian Alone 198 1.1% 250 1.3% 336 1.7% Pacific Islander Alone 6 0.0% 8 0.0% 11 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 325 1.7% 377 2.0% 452 2.3% Two or More Races 130 0.7% 154 0.8°.0 181 0.9°fo Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 1,375 7.4% 1,572 8.3% 1,917 9.7% Data Nate:Iawena is expre>rr_d in tunsnt dollars. Source;U.S.Census&ream,Census 2510 Summary File 1. red forecasts for 2014 and 2519. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 33 ( ) esri .:.1.%... Demographic and Income Profile Polygon Area 49.84 square miles • Laul.:.:',o.25.,..45<-69149 Trends 2014-2019 ,.--, 3- U ... 2.5- 0) 0. 2- 23 1.5- r0 CC 1- i Area a 0.5- Ni ii State 0 Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income Population by Age 25 20 • E., 15 L' 0 ° l0 11111 2014 0 - 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race 935K-549K $256-834K 90 11.8% 9.2% 61016-9246 80 O'' P 1'1: f , 8 1% 70 950K-$74K 16.5% <51.9K 60 'at) 4.;-Z ''..:"; `,...: 0_ 40 30 5200K. A..44'..i.',:,,- '11 11.2% 575K•$99K .IV'.-^-7-,.' 20 12.4% 4::—...:"^:. 4.;,,,. ,-........,iit.,:.!E' 5150K-5199K 10 6.7% 51006-51496 o ...._ . _ 16.8% White Black Arn,Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:8.3% Saurce:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esti forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 011:,--.,:ri Page I of 2 • • ,—... ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 34 PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT �. [Page 10] Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Coiiier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 26] 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 46] 1 Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date: 10/21/2014 PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses: The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally, the following uses are allowed: 1. Department store (5311), 2. Hotel (7011, hotel only), 3. Dental laboratories (8072), and 4. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051). b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 4. A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in conjunction with a convenience store) is prohibited; however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility greater than 15,000 square feet of GFA are allowed. 5. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. 2 Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date: 10/21/2014 PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 c. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 5. At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site i ICI vcgciaiiiii i I I iii ;JG I ciaii ii is !JO(iivi i vi i iativc vctAcLCA IVI i . C110;-1G,-; vl i JiiC is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 141] Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 3 Words underlined are added; words are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date: 10/21/2014 _z ro Ip m = w IW- 0 H Z o Q > W W P ° o I 41. ? 1- 1- � � W NW �ZO to Cn J , Cl. W _�E Z 6 w O 0 8 Z LL c.)Qz OWXXaI= - Q ` O U � Q Ou ZSE0W„ F- Z2 'Jr' U = = > CG v I- wctLU —' woo CO UJ UJ ct ca. W OHIO -, m__ co �, �°� U � JWWZ � UIUcAWa wwb W W I- I- m co ° ° � a � � = goo 21i� A1Nno0 �3i��o0 tg O. e- COONWc» Ou r ..jo CO.. N... - N In M c-W LU J • Li. F- W CL _ U Q J m �� ^^^ . Wy ul N j. ; . /y� 4d l56 a p 656'? ,• _ .. z o a N `Sti` J F 41?.‘‘ •• Uy W R On r m° o �n 8 o §J N!e- _ ,. r wu. 0 ..... 0 C� _ Z a. 4 - Q .M - W g r- Z CT Z Ru,y Oz W } U Oa J I W W co BCN N N\ QQ co ' .. 'm Y' fq of / m \P z U co g U- M M I m LJ o_ .. . ; LL, Q F- ` Q D W W N N co Z .. Z O > o° Z J '. x 0 ,.: o - �■ �_... . W Z WNO I- ° I- U .4- M U o: :r N N f.. ..,. Z W J LL o ' i 1. .. .. N X M ®4 ;Q EXHIBIT E-2 VINCENTIAN PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT Collier County Public Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs as well as wastewater service. The County has major water and wastewater transmission mains located along U.S. 41 and on Southwest Boulevard that are accessible to this property by means of connections and extensions of mains into the property. The County has sufficient capacity to provide Vincentian water and sewer service. The estimated potable water and wastewater requirements for Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict are as follows: Scenario 1 (190,000 SF retail, 57,500 office, and 100-room hotel) Potable Water 42,000 GPD (Peak 117 GPM) Wastewater 38,000 GPD (Peak 106 GPM) Scenario 2 (250,000 SF shopping center) Potable Water 28,000 GPD (Peak 78 GPM) Wastewater 25,000 GPD (Peak 69 GPM) Scenario 3 (122 dwelling units) Potable Water 36,600 GPD (Peak 100 GPM) Wastewater 30,500 GPD (Peak 83 GPM) According to the Collier County AUIR, currently there is a an existing landfill capacity of 18,359,127 tons, and a ten-year landfill capacity requirement of 2,305,407 tons, representing a surplus of 16,053,720 tons of landfill capacity. This is more than adequate to accommodate additional tons per capita disposal generated by the Vincentian Subdistrict. Stormwater retention and detention will comply with SFWMD requirements, and State and County standards for off-site discharges will be met, resulting in no adverse impacts to stormwater management (drainage) level of service. H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Public Facilities Report 1-24-2014.docx EXHIBIT E-3 iremicoc planniwelltilllegrillo Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: Global Properties of Naples Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34103 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: (239) 289-3143 Phone: (239) 566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Vincentiern PUDA TIS- October 2013 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. F / - \/' ;I) Norman J.Trebilcock,AICP, P.E. FL Registration No.47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2375 Tamiami Trail N,Suite 207 Naples, FL 34103 Company Cert.of Auth. No. 27796 2 Vincer lan PUDA TIS- October 2023 Table of Contents Pie Project Description 4- 5 Trip Generation 6- 8 Trip Distribution and Assignment 9-11 Background Traffic 12-13 Existing and Future Roadway Network 14 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network--Roadway Link Analysis 15-16 Intersection/ Project Accesses -Turn Lanes Analysis 17-19 Improvement Analysis 19 Mitigation of Impact 19 Appendix A: Project Methodology Meeting Notes (5 Sheets) Appendix B: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations (3 Sheets) Appendix D: Internal—Pass-By Capture Exhibits (3 Sheets) Appendix E: Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) 3 Vincention PUDA TIS- October 2013 Project Description The Vincentian project is an existing approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) - Collier County Ord. 99-37 - and has a total site area of approximately 30.0 acres, The project site is located in east Naples, at the southwest corner of the intersection of Southwest Blvd. and Tamiami Trail East (US 41), and lies in Section 32, Township SOS, Range 26E, Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1- Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix B - Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1—Project Location Map ea LOCATION MAP - rr; 14:1 • 41 _i PROJECT s ". LOCATION The existing approved Vincentian PUD consists of three (3) uses: Retail –Shopping Center 57,500 sf; Office – General Office - 57,500 sf; Residential – Single Family Detached Housing–40 dwelling units. 4 Vincenti @n UDA DS- October 2013 The proposed Vincentian PUD amendment (PUDA) will continue to be developed as a mixed use commercial project as follows: Scenari• 1 e Retail — Shopping Center 190,000sf; Office — General Office — 57,500sf; Lodging — Hotel — 100 rooms; and Scenario 2 o to consist of a single use of Retail — Shopping Center 250,000sf. Vincentian PUDA T15 provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's trip generation. The development programs are illustrated in the Table 1. Table 1 e Existing Approved Development Program Development Land Use Total Size ITE E Land Use Code Build-Out Year Program '�,�Ex`�,iri i4"..irov�e�x. ...l?...Pp..:"g... .,..��=' .. ,�;Yti•....�, . :_ .- == ,., _. .... .1 w r., . .... .. . _ - � :=Y ,• General Office 710 57 500 sf N/A a'=•PfJD.= ;r„:- ' - - ="rte __ =.v rte. - _-.>-<.;..�:::--,.:_ - .k'.a{':. <':�- - UC11tS: N'. ~ �s_.-:.:: A�.: Shopping Center 820 190,000 sf 2018 Proposed PUDA Scenario Hotel 310 100 rooms 2018 - .,.:...:._,. - ._.-:<..-.i.'::.:.r:-•'+'•r...u.,v,•,:.:..:::i:'.:::'_:':;. -vif e. ,',t :.L a,i:5 ti.;v�-;x..�e7!a::t. _ _ y:;ry:'.:.;.t:: Proposed=i'UDl ',:° :: K f==-. ,x Y::.< _ : s =< •:y..x=z > 3 ^° The internal site circulation system proposes to connect to Southwest Blvd. and Tamiami Trail East. Refer to Appendix B o Project Master Site Plan. 5 Viocenticu PUDA TIS e CCckober 203 Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The software program Otiss— Online Traffic Impact Study Software (Version 3.0.0.137) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates (land use: hotel) and equations (land uses: shopping center, general office and single family residential) were used to generate the project trips. Trip reductions have been applied per ITE and Collier County guidance: internal capture trips—up to 20%, and pass-by trips— up to 25% tor shopping center use. The proposed total project trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A—Scenari. 1 (mixed-use) and Table 2B a Scenario 2 (single-use). The mixed-use scenario (Scenario 1) reveals more intensive PM peak hour 2-way values (PM Total to adjacent streets—851 trips). Table 2C shows the trip generation for the existing approved mixed-use project. Table 2D illustrates the net new proposed trips, and is determined as the difference between most intense proposed scenario (Table 2A m Scenario I) and approved existing project (Table 2C). More details of the trip generation calculations can be found in Appendix C-Trip Generation Calculations. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the internal capture trips should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. For this project, the software program Otiss was used to generate the internal capture trips. The Otiss process follows the trip balancing approach as recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition —Volume 1: User's Guide and Handbook, Chapter 7 - procedure for estimating multi-use trip generation internal capture aka "triangle method". The resulting internal capture rates are below the county limits. The detailed results of the internal capture and pass-by calculations can be found in Appendix D-Enterrnal/ Pass-by Capture Exhibits. 6 V fcention P T0A TIS-October 2013 The pass-by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass-by capture for shopping centers (LUC 820) should not exceed 25% for the peak hour. The daily capture rate is assumed to be 10% lower than the peak hour rate. Table 2A Propssed Scenario 1 Trip Generation m Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour Way Volume r�,r'f•",.•__�..`-sE='-y::.� - __ >a�<E: _ - -- - - r?t.��„w�_.� ,.ar��_:. ? x-_ ._ �z+�.: - i'£`3 •.;F:f z,'1,. il� l:a{cf= s Size° EHtec E, t - Eoter 777{7.7e.7, � __ �,., ,.t'2t .:c,'•_.:..:',::::'P�'i: F Shopping Center 190,000sf 10,307 143 88 442 479 vJ'::C�4T -�£�!1.:-�r.Y':�i':• �•��:?.�'?' - �,'s�:.:K•_. _-Ge eral:`O�'rspO '=57 SQHs :�' QQ�� ¢ Ae ,.�:-r;•...d,/,_� ��;,�. .~i'7':a+-,i�^. _ .•�V.O�i� ..:H4, :L�!.. ��::� ,.I!.a.•� --. �. a.ti:.�:��:S.'r'.r:.r 'j••'_-S+i.w._._. •.fi..J J_�-i�-i.w�r.. Hotel 100 occ. rooms 892 39 28 34 36 s '0 001, vU f f F+ RUNT: =:11634 Internal Capture* -30 -30 _ '_TF.i:+y-: i�"'":'Y"•__ �'ts '4- •�E,._J.t.:f,.; �1tt,;__ _ _ +.j�t<i:KS.f1'+'.• - :.f:.?+.:'±.. - - - �4L�L'. ..i-s��.�.s sf,: .T� ~>tiI.lFw ".>3-.- :� i doh aSr"i°��5�4�-Y - ..K`�.d ]¢ :I .�"•r- ��,�,,,��.y �'t'vt% 'R�7ti:r - - .iGy� Ys> t Y F`t ''F.F �-+H�' ,1 4l,G4LLr� 4,14I.Y .•rt_:-- .ta.Y_ .£F¢'=r - '`ice$ et {': X.':}'..._"L i-w?f ,.iyrY'.i,c'',.:_.Y V:'. t.t•:,,�� ..w ..y'::C._--:.. -..�i....k a+'•�l:i.-+�.jyr{:�r't':�� .:a.. --._. f.�•: :`•�i`:;A>aW'L'. vr�is':. i•-:.?.f�w Pass-By Trips * -106 -117 a� 1` �r,A:? Notes: - Internal Capture—up to 20% max; *;-Pass-By Trips—up to 25%for shopping center. Table 2B—Proposed Scenario 2 Trip Generation — Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour Way Volume Yip„ ,.} :SE:. ii`' '�+. •:t .y'.: - +`t:: rn� - 'sej •rn n F':� .c'^5��e�`tom::. :r_ -- strite =�x. ... `•"•:tl (�`'�rti. :T,.!•�;';l'i _:n., P.n�5n• -� 14�'4 �4.,....0 `'r '.�.?. a:{''t�s.. >:.;;W+"`.s! . Shopping Center 250,000sf 12,320 169 104 531 576 p.7wi,:v-c 1:i�i:lK: +i�rtL:' _-� '•':= [.'Y"Yn:' •.r�.. � - .L'7.;�.:F 'tom' - - - .l z:��-.>: 9'Y��k:,;?i. /,.. s.�,... -`'fir - .i•Y':�._ S +..,.f: - - :'ti`�" - ._. .Y?:��... ,. t .-, i'f�,'�b��a`.a#.•�.7R..a.._ .._4t.f. .. ... 3.<_. _ .. � Total to adjacent streets 398 432 Notes: -- Pass-By Trips—up to 25%. 7 Vincentiin PUNA TES-October 2013 Table 2C—Existing Approved Project Trip Generation —Average Weekday ----------- 24 Hour Two- AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour Way Volume "Card U"e°'. •-� ..:�: ?S� e:° _;: .� � k�, e =a:�ri:t�'�� s z s Shopping Center 57,500 sf 4739 69 42 199 215 ,} .rte• .mow '.feiier`•.at: ce:=:: '�57 "108-`" •].5� 4 ..,_:-. ,.�-.:'i+V... wi•. .. w. -.. ..'4ii. : ice" E.r SF Residential 40 units 452 10 28 29 17 .fi r_ t ".Y �a a ... - I: - S S ::4 g"': 40' : 5...st e m Internal Capture* -29 -29 Pass-By Trips** -46 -51 - - w d5�� F' r. 77 �T` 'a �=sit e - difaf#�oaad - ��• .-..........r.., _.-... ..3A'1a•• . _.._i..._ ...u.. ..Y ._ ... a. Yk?`.K.. .a. ._ ,_ 'i, r..--,..-:rte??'{•,:., .._. ._ -.. Notes: * -Internal Capture—up to 20%max; **-Pass-By Trips—up to 25%for shopping center. Table 2D—Net New Proposed Project Trip Generation — Average Weekday PM Pk Hour ©eve004014:WaV Proposed Scenario 1 Development 364 487 851 €xisting_ApprovedDeitelddPment •: 177 ,:: ; ... .:`, 271: - K._., ._,.:..r^ _:. 448 _ . Net New Difference 187 216 403 The net new proposed trip generation shown in Table 2D reveals a net increase in the PM peak hour volumes, proposed conditions versus existing approved conditions. The Table 2D values are what will be used for the trip distribution and assignment in the roadway link analysis. The Table 2A–Scenario 1 –Total external values (PM –Enter–500 and PM –Exit–634) are to be used for the operational – intersection/site access turn lanes analysis. 8 VI,IcerrtIon PUDA TIS Ocfrober 2013 Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area, previously submitted study data and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. The net new proposed site-generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3—Project Traffic Distribute•n for PM Peak Hour, Peak Direction and is graphically depicted on the next page - Fig. 2—Project Distribution By Percentage and Fig. 3—Project Distribution By PM Peak Hour. Refer to Appendix B - Project Master Site Plan. Table 3—Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour, Peak Direction CC Distribution PM Peak Hr Project AUIR Traffic Volume Roadway Link Roadway Link Location of Project Link Traffic US 41 92 0 Airport Rd.to Rattlesnake 35% 66 76 Hammock Rd. mss_ - i`i;�:�:�Y;+••,,;,•:'�::>?�-s.-:=t �: _ - :.y,,z. - e�°:. ,t:Y _ "sr..:•�;;:r ,.<;),:€+�; :a: 5C-"3_:t,;.. es,:5';:r:r:^s'r .t .h...n-_ - •:N;-��-.-- ..'��a-.,.,SO-`yj�;=�'l;t -.. ��.. ., _.. ,.e.+�'�� -::`rwY•;. ..a 5y ,L.... v.-... ..�:x..-::y::...=:.F• ...._ .... US 41 93.0 St.Andrews Blvd.to 60% 112 130 Project US 41 94 0 Triangle Blvd.to Collier 25% 47 54 Blvd. ,...;. :.-,e ..fie.:•. :_. � �: ... ./ f 4>, i B$ fUGesI`.Iok'Uti'5:4�(y _ Q.��] t: # :,� r(7i :�•��}'{z.�ti=;{' ,.,�.'rho,Hassan-.Dr�,�: :��•�'�F�^•�:: T.'-'-.',:G-:...:_:.. r:....ts:'!-`+f•.f_.'ACC l�.''yM1�_:,_ :Y..� w,•:Y.L '---�A-Ta]:.<�_ �j:!•�',I:iar-.:C'%�.: Rattlesnake 72.0 US 41 to Charlemagne 5% 9 10 Hammock Rd. Blvd. ::1 _ : .��:**irivest Collier Blvd. 35.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 15% 28 32 to US 41 T.. _ -i!T''.!:>1+'` ;C.T .J,.•1r 'Y =:F- LS-i.•• .W`�,.'K:j+:�'r 4`��r(+,!�-." h-�• .tt. :Y�f' Y q - t;F:Y:Ir: �,•. -=3„3.'�c.;�•, ;l_..�:,}; _ .a� !_•. rt {� .. • 't `'; :r:. -;.t:' t`i•=l.,.:. .>'.✓•'j• .�ollieic��ty -3Er�7:�� - =F�'�.:-- :.�:.•�• (�Yr°-;T. - �_ .�?�--:•<.: _ ,. •'yam.... ...._.�.'L`�a -._�•,W':: �......._.v..........,.� .-.......'t%.3. -.:[...n.-.-i`i-:-Y'=-:.1.•. .b-:_. . .. • >_�- - -.. • Notes: *-Not a CC AUIR monitored roadway facility. 9 Vincentian PUDA TIS m October 2013 Fig. 2--Project Distribution By Percentage ?5°fo • ABS. 5% PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION (ABS. 5%I N13°96 BY PERCENTAGE • E:.'=" 10% ABS. 5% 5096 ABS. 5% _3e d` 60°/0 35% m ABS. 5% if ='f 1 5% 15% PROJECT TABS. 5961 .: . . LOCATION NOTE 10% ABS.=ABSORPTION 10 Vineentian PUDA - October 2013 Fig. 3—Project Distribution By PM Peak Hour l.7 — PROJECT TRIP �NB=76 SB= 661 - DISTRIBUTION \ B= 22; EB= 19 I% BY PM PK HR 8_Us}, 9; EB= 10 4.=y 47 . NB=108; SB= 94 IN8=130; SB=112ta. ` ,igel - Lsoi liar( ! : IN'B=66; SB= 761:' I 10; EB= 9 �s IN..B 47; SB=.54 , ��" f NB= 32 'PROJECT 0-1 SB= 28 LOCATION NB= 19 ' SB= 22 11 Vincentk r PUDA TIS e o rt=rher 2013 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Transportation Planning Staff Guidance of a minimum 2%growth rate, or the historical rate derived from Collier County annual traffic counts (estimated from 2008 thru 2012), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2013 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. For this project, the controlling (highest) volume is the AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4- Background Traffic without Project, illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the year 2018—see next page. 12 Vincent®®n PUDA TES e October 2013 Table 4—Background T ralisc W � atpe a, rt uIt-N t&uA3°&0i p 2013 AUIR Projected 2018 Projected CC Peak Ear, Traffic Peak Hr,Peak Dir Roadway Link AUIR Roadway Link Peak Dir Annual Trip Growth Background Link Location Background Growth Bank Factor Traffic Volume • ID# Traffic Vol Rate w/out Project • (trips/hr) (%/yr) (trips/hr) sr,;.qtr•. • N' .•ry ; :s}.,.: - 4:i '. �:5' 'i=;s ;`-i',: •r: T,t_: rt�,( - •' .�.r.ti t e. n- .:g'.i•` ▪ - �!':, '�'• .aE -"+'^��•`�',n ':: !'',1•r''-F,:`"•;t,ti,= S• 7.AIr �rC.�t� to _ s+ r � 3•. t�h� 4?.;rt,"rt. .35_ .5'.: �„ x "l;tn, ,. xr�;'F zu 'h few 32:0`- �if�e5r1a.�ICla;�ap�4t(�' •�"-��.70(sr-$j- i.e ;��"j�'��x. -� t1�' I} - Sr �F9 ��''�".-' ` e < ��-�3 �• -.?-<.a �i'4izs s€'� 't -� � a rn b s .�▪� kin._. p ts.' ..i..r_ T£.x. ._.. _.,a.. ..y..:;n..'- - Sc... ,x'G :.-6:r Aa 4;� •:�-: _-..-... ... _• -. .. _. r.<-�_..ri.-;.:j u'.w _ _.. r. <.stiii .rtt'•t-�..: Rattlesnake Hammock US 41 93.0 Rd.to St.Andrews 1,980(SB) 3.0% 577 1.1593 2,557 • Blvd. .Sr p •d e1NS :::�0. An '1 S i•,:-.yc ri ' r fç94nsrn i rre • y. �'S .:' Lk_�' � ..-..._,n.- c .. r t._::'1zT;..n_i i��•if�li=:'.,s �... ,.•-_•.�a- �x�: US 41 93.0 Project to Triangle 1,980(SB) 3.0% 577 1.1593 2,557 Blvd. '>'t ice•▪ =i•- :�ia= - - ^Yx!Y is _ _.. -...1.•:iyT,...'•'r.�,...��-.d_r ...-,..�..-..__.^ ... _:f='..:t=�'�'�-�.�=•`. ..:�.i:�•. ...•_s._ .<.,1 ... .. ......., _ _.. r`,��s:.:"7i:i�s.r`r.:''A=.'c:v-'..>h. .a c....,. Thornasson 108.0 Bayshore Dr.to US 41 420(EB) 2.0% 105 1.1041 525 Dr. �.�.. 3 #=e�q _ 4 ,{�� _. ... - .-. _ ;#:rd's• r. .. :��y�° t �-i��<;r`;::>?�4aa''� ' i`•- R l} :>.ftlesnake:� r ,�is/�' , � _ ,�. .�:. �s-=µ r } 1 U3•.�,f��®?�h rr�adno •l.:• r- :.tiy� r y f d. d ,iSy ti.7. t �•ti.:_ ,-:�;�3f�iVv�) 'f.� 3 0°1�a � _ �'��O�s -1 1593�` � .F1$D;,4,_�_�; -�kte• .e � �Y�. r art. ra.=,,.:,.-St_�+•. .•v'.< mmoc�Rd-. _. .,. _g(� ._..•�5.�. x;� .... ;�. ... a'o-r_.,lF*=: :`�;''ts:t L=":.'... :.-'Y,•r`t,,�, •. .. '.'_.. ." '^'. . ._.—.. .._+::t:-•c,:`"-'.;✓ Southwest Corso Bello Dr.to Blvd. N/A Project N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A .'y. ':x iis• ▪ .X. u -"y:r ,Fw,, i$ ' .ci c./▪ .`+•?'� ::7- S!�.;'L...!}' ' '�' :i•=£o�:f+l'4le-r� �'c'��:��35l�y{_: )�.p -- `-�:,.CCj"q-3'/}v"**.:'!f.:vui;.(:�-"ir+`..-t �..✓'..�,� - a:._. .fi• --}},,-X•:�.:•�sii::s-�^,c.+,..2'..•_(3: k:.''•vM� OG•'*Fs1N3 f04Z 4 AV IA 6:/ ....._....-..-::':..:-...3G'::�.`}-%::^:XK.".a .�.l..��. .-......;?.. .=n'i'c.-6_x-� --.::4r. .:':�-t,•-a._.,. ..n.• ...--mss_•4.,•..._ ,''Fr�.�k.>...r.«..._ ._.:.�:y:•�'`.._^- .-�Sr": ... .. Collier Blvd. 36.1 US 41 to Wal-Mart 1,820(NB) 2.0% 723 1.1041 2,543 Driveway Table Note: Growth Rate=from 2008 to 2012 CC traffic count data,or 2%,whichever is greater.Growth Factor=(1+Annual Growth Rate) "5. 2018 Projected Volume=2013 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor,or 2013 AUIR+Trip Bank,whichever is greater. N/A=not applicable, not available.Note*-Not a CC AUIR • monitored roadway facility. • 13 Vincentian PUDA !IS-October 2013 • Existing and Future Roadway Network - The existing roadway conditions are extracted ted f r om the 2012 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and the 2018 roadway conditions are based on the current FDOT and Collier County 5 Year Work Program. The roadways evaluated are anticipated to remain the same thru 2018. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5 o Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5—Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC Exist Peak Exist Future AUIR Exist Dir,Peak fir Roadway Link Link Roadway Link Location Roadway Min LOS Capacity Roadway# Volume y •�''ly:•.;.-t.o 5....1 ,4a: �.�;'�` �Sl_:;_ -+..Y. ..: :.. �. 4 � t �-4,yS.,_ h ;4iif2;'.�:;',�?.' ��", Y! US:0`1i:t i; �r. ' � ^}},•� ':ti�I.CI]Ol� C�.t© atttlG'3�18k `f R i 7 90 s.. 3 • US 41 93.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 6D E 3,000 6D to St.Andrews Blvd. ,.• �,y• ^- ,�} Q 1 _.. � mot.. �• ¢ - - _ ..€ �r �•. y - a� 1:.i5' .Y.f:Yf•{^�^'.E , _-.�. rt .a w'a-t ..!yyVaa. a�'.a,r��, US 41 93.0 Project to Triangle Blvd. 6D E 3,000 6D _ Thomasson Dr. 108.0 Bayshore Dr.to US 41 2U D 800 2U ^.V: -- :y" - '.:d1,._'S�!•�: i•.!:° .e!�„5 - - -i:T::'- - 3s?- of"j.,= `_ - ��2 x r'•na a - S"4 - i =Pe.a r3e• ;`ds. ,��c. ^:r. ;a _. :ty._;� c �'ye, '�'%'::�+:.cC•e''.•'•x _ - •�� 1sf-•_ •-�'�:.:_'�•r?;uw;.• x!:1'1_' •%=;=:i �r: s,:.•�:"a y'E t. I? C-::t,'rT.' - .•••, :r'_: ;y;...'-F."_ ,8 -..rt •.. _ a zta)-,"-_:::. r.;:Frt"..:r^a•.c.>�,: Southwest N/A Corso Bello Dr.to Project 2U N/A 800 2U Blvd.* tesa e:Hamroc Wit;= Q - =?.`9e: ':-r'.:`',•[�• art.- c _ .� .Y. %{?1 - ti..�`.- -- r'r. l�47�' ..rc._:.." =s.!7�>,•r.}:.�.•I�=,r. Collier Blvd. 36.1 US 41 to Wal-Mart 6D E 2,500 6D Driveway Table Notes: 2U=2-lane undivided roadway;4D, 6D=4-lane, 6-lane divided roadway,respectively; LOS =Level of Service. N/A=not applicable, not available. Note*-Not a CC AUIR monitored roadway facility.Southwest Blvd.road service volume is assumed similar to Shadowlawn Dr. —CC AUIR ID#144. 14 Vincenti n PUDA TIS o October 2023 Project Impacts to Area Roadway kletwork--Roadtgay Link/Analyses The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future (2018). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link adjacent to the project; 3%for other links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. The project PM peak hour volumes are added to the network volumes to coincide with the network peak time and peak direction. Table 6 e Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. None of the adjacent links are projected to be operating below the adopted level of service with, or without the project. Although the percentage volume capacity exceeds County thresholds for some of the roadway links, the roadway facilities are projected to operate within the adopted LOS and therefore in an effective and efficient manner. Based on these criteria, this project creates significant, but not adverse impacts to the area roadway network. 15 Vi.-7centian PUDA TIS-October 2013 ..._.... Table 6—Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS)—With Project in the Year 2018 .... 2°12 cc Link "A.CD %Vol Min LOS Man OS Peak Peak CC Peak Dir AUIR Roadway Link Dir, (Proj'ect Dir, imCappact. ewxciteheoduetd exceeded Roadway Link Peak Ur Peak Hr Link Location Vol ID# r 06 iye ct Project? Project? Cap. VOI. Added) Project - - ..__‘_,._ -,-.7..--77.--..::::,-..:- ---.-.--7f-i-i,-.., ,. ___..„_;,.,,,--.,---„, ,--._.-. ..i.::. -,: :_:--. -.4:.: ._-,,,,...::-.,.. :-., ,...„,-.7-:-. ,,,..,-,:::, -, :.. -,-5- '' ..?.....;::■;:f.:_=" :i':._; -.‘,-,:',..:Y.t irport:411:.49: : :::4:::-.'-5.5-: ::•?'''.':,.‘1:41f.::.'zf .-ei; v5:°Ig?irs_i.,,,-,:-,---.=,-;•.".:.:-•:.., .-51-.-..8%----; .: '.:-:-.-;,.;Ntr_ 51.---;:'.'- ..F..'..:•:VIVIVAi. fti4;: . ' a"/ .ar.:4.-'...14- 4-i-:...1 kg-i461igCk-' :,:.'-'.:Za0b:,if-k", ,.4r,-661:.7'.::' ''''':.- -§..,-1;:..:'7---i' -:-... ';.''..:-.;:;:--,',,-.1);,:M:-: ,....1•. •Nrif(VF:':1,`,.:;..:7 ;:ft,11S41.::,..-:-_ ,';',' :f:',- .!-!,:::t i. ,.7.7.-P97,-.7.,..&-.-:-.7-,----.:-:-..,-.,.,,,-:I !;:Z:ii-' ,; :4:•:::=:::-;:z•'-, ,.-F;f,,:f: l'ga -'7;';i•:---..=ric", _.'.. .'-'.:•:•-f:s.g-:•-•:4&i=Ei'i.-:.,:j-: !..5Z .i,,ges :c.,--,••-: .••-:::•i.',.-- ::-'.-z•'- :f'.'-.. --=•`.:-• ...".• • •• — • Rattlesnake Hammock US 41 93.0 Rd.to St.Andrews 3,000 94 2,651 3.1% No No , I , ! ' Blvd' .,_..., , • - -- ._ -. ,_:.------••:•,..7.•-:- ,-.-7: 7-i==. : -;::' .TViit:•?;::: 4";; ,;*:"..:.. -,-•,,..7 ,.',--,;-..t.,.3,,.. :.--Tf 1•-•1=s-,:" : ......-.•: .,i.::::•2•-• ;:•:... ..- ..::,--.•.:;•,,,C' t..c.::::=:.-r.'•;4.',1-7..v.'..‘,..:•':::: ; ; i,.....'. =• -;: =,••-i'-.:.,'' '‘'-iii.ir'-',.:1;i 1,;.---"4-1.o..,,---.,-:,. .. :-.;-,;4.,J-,---:,-...-,,:-:,--..:.--.:-....,-... -.,: ...,7%,,,,..,,.;...-E-...:.-N-,..,:,,,,..-,-41.,......pitk;-;-a.;:fr, 7,--'..4",;•. -,'-:c?'-:-:-:-7.,:-3--'- -'6--']' -':-1'-''- -,.-1 -- tAndt-OW-s, i ,•:t.O. 41- -4't,',"''Kr.-...- '-'',.,-31.2--',,- -,:4,6u9, . -3=4 ,.'4-,-a-,: ',-.g...,-9-.-.-z.-. :,------,,,,.-qt-,,,,,.:, ...11"...-c--ill."-'''•''-.:'' ='..."'ff'--- ...z4:1';'''..-3"A"'=7-'-kV-f;t14'--1 .:1 1.1...A.,iMAF-. ?..i.''-'`:::-: ; ---'-%''...4::',-Ii;-;.i5..•,--i:.-. ip::::.,:; ,_,.,,,.___-:',.-..,-'!:,..sc.-.1?:......:_......--,:::;:littijp„,L-',1--:4:-:::tz,--1 :....,. .,_-:-. -.......-2,:zi --,y,-;-,...:-.,:.-.22 -:-.•!,-,.,.:-.•1-7.,.:-T't!:%;-.,/...:-..f.:--...-:-,.c.--,-,,..,.-,.::',4_,:,,,.. .'.:-•7.-,.t....---',--, . - .. ..,...e.=:,71.,..4 :7,...;_y:,,,,,::.7,.::::•-ft:t'si...,i;',W4.;',F.;;'.'1:1::).,-..1.i.-?.E.:!",..;4.-:?..11:".,:r../....1,"3,',..0-1'...7'"'•"..''• -j'' ' '''•—. Project to Triangle 3,000 76 2,633 2.5% No No US 41 93.0 Blvd. . ,i.....W--;; 4,c.c:::!::-'2::::'-ffi..- ,,..-...,..-e ,.,:''.-j.:4,IjEiti.X.14-31:EI.P14,irlui';:;F:: =;?s,"...:"?1'.:!;-:41.,';.,•- -...::,,k .- : .-: - :: -.: ,.h:7146,•P:Slt.'4.;" .4ftreliiiiieBliffj 'EV:.:t"?...-41,t1A'r;{-11k' ,,t1.%•:2?- .. ;.■•.;,471i11§71;;:-:,!-.7...1896.:,-, .--::::,.:".":.:-BP'''',:::2-;•t5.1":".i.,....-,--,:licY.:2. . .V.1;:i,.:-.- .,..,.. „01;,i71:7-.;: . ,il,;, !..:2,-6VU', f:1-5-fq: 7*--;"=,...'.11:1-..;:::.:-.::::---Crirn:::';-:::Y;-2';':::::::.?-.::::-.- :•-:'-if-- :::-:::;:' .:::•.;:.'..,.2.-7':Ii:',-i!.:/:r.5 ..47:•&;;:l'..7%'-US741:. ..i,''?-'-:2:Vci,(5-,:-:;tp-'urert:gritcl,,FA-:-.----ce,i),---1-...---.,7:-.:i,:?:-.;;,!.I..t .,.7%:1;'4..f.-..: • .:,-1.-- Bayshore Dr.to US 41 2.4% No No 800 19 544 Thomason Dr. 108.0 .,..,,.-,‘,....-....,,-,,.:.,0,-,,,....4...i..,:::.-... 5.,imr.-P.z.a',..)-.1. 310:.1.':.. 1-t.--';'*,.,7-:,-rf-,:.v.--.1-,ft;$ ,' "f4.1--.1.444,7:-• :;r3,41,41%itel '1,-•t-:•''.:179914.v:4!eatOSWV 4't!.',t44.,,- :.-k:-Irvri ..:,.rr',3-1-:,-,:.•-,4,.'4.- .1:,.:::.Rattliastralcef,:nk r„it:÷71•J.,,-,A4,45„,,,*.,:i2i.j...:1-.:*yg-,,,,.---"f:75.1,7.,-;,,risgotok ,.7. ..• .l. :,'.:-I',----_-.-oz.x.1...-•::,11' :..t:,t-?,-..4.--1.-.iri:::::;,-.:ft..-,;,Af.,•:,*,-...,7t:IF-Fit.;lk 1;:51'..tr.:--':.-:;.=.i.v.-N.,-•.?.:..:.y..?. rk-'71-24-i-:-iii3.1.itiiii7-el-Z;'-,.'::;;{-4r44;:t44 At.e.i.7:-.i•t-iit..rt.t.2Ari,;:14.'23,- .,;-'...:!-?-s'P-1;-. 1-A0m•'-',-- -'-' ---- -----'-'-'-"=."— 1491P19-C::1174:4 f.i.-F?.N!-.2 - E.:-.:-.'i----;V,•-•-. ,:..-.,;-•. ...,-- - - - • •,, Southwest Corso Bello Dr.to Blvd.* N/A Project 800 10 N/A 1.3% No No ._;,-,:,..,-,-e:,.,;.,:m.,,,,-.2-..?.;-1.:4,..toit-5::',- :-.....,-,,..-,-...,,K41-174 - .-:e•-- .,!:,..f .cfe- .,'=;,.,- :i741;f--!; i5:::.:1 .. l.;,.,5.-...:4.':...,., .-.4)-:;,.....2;-: '..-..;f:--:`.k:;,';54='.=.5'• r.''''',..3.'. ''''''''ij-'1:1U5;74. 7.•-:"..;..1;-:- .'.41;117.4:#-444iIM.,7 9f1,7,5:!:'....1;:4 .*.ls:q.'"-: 44i. .'.i-t ,_.4-1:9§1.0 M.." 7.:.:.;'..C- .:11:1?-: ::.:44`: .4-1.: t•;7/.: .::;;;...1::' Nit,.-.16.6.S.:14V,4467;':P.2:,':•i',...q:k&.■::):L::':%,:W .t:i 6:,:.ti'a5tica;i:(4":..,. .;2t,'"'"+:17'1.4.'-•"..'''.:V'''''•":''.1.4".7.'''.• a''" '— .- f',..-:..-.,,-r,-,:.i„-...„i1.2,•-,;,,s-fr:!.,!i..,-.,7..fg:),:i.,.. , :..,.1• •:.;•-..- . ..- 1 - ' •x?,-0*-'i. ',"---'"--"'''---- -'''' "••-. V:C.A..t..1Fr.•-:7::;',*".-If;C,..7A1,7;.439,,;:!•-',..,,r.j,"-f,-"Pe-.,.,,,--,r--- - US 41 to Wal-Mart Collier Blvd. 36.1 Driveway 2,500 19 2,562 0.8% No No Table Notes: N/A not applicable, not available. Note* -Not a CC AUIR monitored roadway facility. Southwest Blvd. road capacity is assumed similar to Shadowlawn Dr. -CC AUIR ID#144. 16 Vincenticin PUDA TD'S- Tc vber 2013 Intersection/ Project Accesses e Turn Lane Analysis The Vincentian PUDA project proposes 3 accesses as follows: two access points off of Southwest Blvd. —Entrances#1 &#2—full movement accesses, and one access point off of US41®Tamiami Trail East e Entrance#3 - right in / right out access. Refer to Appendix B - Project Master Site Plan. Tamiami Trail East (US 41) is under Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Collier County jurisdiction and it is currently a north-south six-lane two-way urban arterial roadway and has a posted legal speed limit of 55 mph in the vicinity of project. Based on FDOT Index 301 (design speed of 55mph), the minimum turn lane length is 350ft (which includes a 50 ft taper) plus required queue. Southwest Boulevard is a two lane west-east undivided local roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 25mph in the vicinity of project. Based on FDOT Index 301 (design speed of 35 mph), the minimum turn lane length is 145ft (which includes a 50ft taper) plus required queue. Project accesses were evaluated for turn lane warrants based on Collier County Right-Of-Way Ordinance #2003-37: a) two-lane roadways - 40vph for right turn lane/20vph for left turn lane; b) multi-lane divided roadways - turn lanes shall always be provided. US 41 - St. Southwest Blvd.e Unsignalized Intersection The intersection of Southwest Blvd. and US41 is located in the proximity of the project. There is no operating traffic control signal at the intersection at this time, but it is under design by others. EB Southwest Blvd. approach provides one left-turn lane and one through/right- turn lane (+/- 320ft). Eastbound exiting volume may warrant a double left turn lane, if combined with future background traffic. 17 V ncentiin PL.DA, TIS ocGober 2013 SB US41 approach provides one right-turn lane (f/- 475ft) and one left-turn Bane (+/- 350ft). NB US41 approach has one right-turn lane (f/- 550ft) and one left-turn lane. The existing turn lanes on US 41 serving the intersection will accommodate the operational needs of the project for both deceleration and stacking. Refer to Appendix E—Turning Movements Exhibits. This intersection may require modifications, which will be determined at the time of final development order review. Project Accesses—Turn Lanes Minimum turn lane lengths required at project build out conditions were analyzed based on number of turning vehicles in an average of 1-minute period (for right turns) and 2-minute period (for left turn), within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue/vehicle considered is 25ft. A more detailed evaluation of the turn lanes for project access points would be implemented at the time of proposed development plan design and permitting, as applicable. Entrance #1— EB Southwest Blvd. EB Right Turn Lane—The project is expected to generate 25 right turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive right turn is not warranted. WB Left Turn Lane —The project is expected to generate 25 left turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive left turn is warranted and it is recommended to be 170ft in length, at the minimum. Entrance #2— ER Southwest Blvd. WB Left Turn Lane—The project is expected to generate 200 left turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive left turn is warranted and it is recommended to be 320ft in length, at the minimum. 18 Vilcentiww PUDA TIS e Go c Ober 2013 Entr ince #3 °SB US 41 CR Right Turn Lane—The project is expected to generate 250 right turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive right turn is warranted and it is recommended to be 475ft in length, at the minimum. lmpe Ivernent Analysis The project impacts to the Collier County roadway network are significant but are not adverse. Based on the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project is a significant traffic generator to this location. Empirically,the project is estimated to create a significant delay at Southwest Blvd. and US41 intersection that may warrant modifying the turn lane configuration geometry (additional turn lane) and/or installation of operating control signals that would improve service level. The recommended offsite improvements will be permitted and approved through the development order process. Mitigation of impact The developer will provide appropriate mitigation and commitments as listed in the revised Planned Unit Development (PUD) document, in order to aid transportation improvements, as applicable. 19 Vincerlltion PUN IA TIS- October 2013 Appendix A: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodcakgy Meeting S Sheets 20 Vincentian PUDA TIS o October 2013 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as n worksheet to ensure that no heapoa aet elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:October 11.2013 Time: N/A Location:Collier County Development Services People Attending: Name,Organization,and Telephone Numbers 1) Reed Jarvi.CC Growth Mgmt Div 2) John.Podzerwinskv.CC Growth Mend Div 3) Robert Mulhere.Mulhere&Associates 4) Norman Trebilcock..TCS Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title:Norman Trebilcock Organization:Trebilcock Consulting Solutions Address&Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard. Suite 202.Naples: Fl 34110:.ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title:John.Podczerwinskv.Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization&Telephone Number:CC Growth Mgmt Division:239-252-5890 Applicant: Applicant's Name:Global Properties of Naples(Christopher Shucart) Address: 2614 Tamiami Trail North.Suite 615.Naples.FL 34103 Telephone Number:(239)289-3143 Proposed Development: Name: Vincentian PUDA Location: corner of US 41 and Southwest Blvd—East Naples.FL Land Use Type: General Office.Hotel..and Shopping Center ITE Code g: 710 (General Office): 310 (Lodging– Hotel): 820 (Retail –Shopping Center) Proposed number of developiuent-units: General Office 57.5 ksf: Hotel 100 rooms: Retail-Shopping Center—190ksf. Existing approved conditions: General Office 57.5ksf Shopping Center — 57.5ksf Single.Family Residential–40 dwelling units. Page l of 5 21 Vincent?®n PUDA TIS a October 2013 Description: Eliminating Single Family Residential. Creating mixed use commercial project General office remains the same (Osf additional). Hotel is added (104 .rooms) and Retail is expanded(Shopping Center-132.5ksf additional). Zoning Existing:PUD.residential.office and retail are allowed uses. Comprehensive plan recommendation:N/A Requested:PUD amendment-other uses to be added and expanded_as applicable. Significance Test-2%!2%/3% The project generates more than 100 net new total 2-way AM or PM peak hour trips and significantly impacts one or more roadway facilities. Study: Roadway Link Concurrenev—based on net new trips. Operational intersection( site access turn-lane analyses—based on total external project trips. Study Type:, Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS 0 Major TIS. Study Area: Boundaries:Southwest Blvd.. US 41.Collier Blvd.-Rattlesnake Hammock Rd_ Additional intersections to be analyzed:US 41 and Southwest Blvd. Build Out!Planning Horizon Year(s):2018 Use 2013 CC AUIR Analysis Time.Period(s):PM Pk Hr Future Og Site Developments:N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates:ITE LUC Data—ITE 9th Edition Reductions in Trio Generation Rates:. None:NM. Pass-by trips:Per ITE.CC Guidance.up to 25%for shopping center. Internal trips(PUD):Per 1TE.CC Guidance:up to 20%o maximum. Transit use:NIA • Other: Net impact proposed minus existing approved(57.5 ksf general ofc. 57.5 retail. and 40 single family). Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 201S { Page 2 of 5 22 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 1 . rlMethodology Sr.:kssumptions: 11 Non-site traffic estithateS,•.2013-CC AUJR ! Site-trip generation:Otiss Software.-itE 9-'1`Edition I Trip distribution method:Engineer's Estimate-'Fig. 1 consistent with approved 200k RS 1 Traffic assignment method project trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate:annual historical growth rate.or 2%minimum . Additional Notes: 1. 100%.of project trips for access points and any necessarlr signal_ analyses (as, applicable). 2. Only net new trips for policy 5.1 (transp. .element). consistency(link distribution). . . Fig. i-Project Trip Distribution by Percentage ..... . , . . ...... . .-. ._ : ' Oi._ ;. • . 11 • . ::_T,'P-14:.li • ,„ .-• . . - . . _._ . . . ... . . ' 5 ABS.5% • • - PRIXIECT TRIF . . i • ! '1. • • DISTRIBUTION 1 ABS.5% EE . • • BY PERCENTAGE ..,..— . ...;:,: , N i- . ,.. . ....., ,. . . ...• - • s. 4C--> . '. - 4-3* • . - -.- . -..?.:::-.-.:;. tO% ,'A.: :. • • . 4 ABS.5% • ] • , .(ABS.5%1 '7 _ •. . . / . ‘ " .• . . .- 1. - . . ' " • . Eli/11 'PROJECT !ABS.56A1 w14. LOCATION . •,i71 NOTE: • : 1O% t . _ - ABS.=-ABSORPTION - ! . _ , . • • .. • .. . - v.. " - . . • Page 3 of 5 ., . 23 • Vincentian PUDA T1. a October 2013 Special Features:(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations:N/A . Sight distance:N)A Queuing:.N/A Access location&configuration:US41.Southwest Blvd coordinate with FDOT on U841 Traffic control:MUTCD Signal system location&progression creeds:N/A On-site parking needs:per CC LDC Data Sources:ITE Trio Gen..:2013 CC AUIR:CC Traffic Counts Base maps:NIA Prior study reports:NIA • Access policy ail-4 jui sdiciion:CQ DOi • Review process:PUDA Requirements:N/A • Miscellaneous:NIA • Small Scale Study–No Fee— Minor Study-$750.00 • Major Study-$1500.00 _includes 2 intersections • Additional Intersections-$500.0 each All fees will be agreed to daring the Methodology meeting and roust be paid to Transportation prior to our sez-offcradle application_ SIGNATL.iRE8 lttrumut 7icide.oc4 Study Preparer Reviewers • Applicant • • Page 4 of 5 24 Vincenfrian PUDA TIS COctober2013 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology R.eview, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review-S500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement,including review of submitted hip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County,if needed. • "Small Scale Study"Review-No Additional Fee chides one sufficiency review Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation,distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor_Stud__Review"-$750 Fee eludes one sufficiency review Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes:optional field visit to site,confirmation of trip generation,distribution,and assignment concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of of site improvements within the right-of-way,review of site access and circulation,and preparation and review of"sufficiency"-comments/questions. "Major Study Review"-51.5040 Fee(Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confrniration of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements,review of traffic volume data collected/assembled,review of traffic growth analysis,review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis,review of site access and circulation,neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates,and preparation and review of up to two rounds of"sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review"-S500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the sane parameters as outlined in the"Major Study Review"and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the"Major Study Review" "Additional Sub€�ciency Reviews"-S50(0 Fee) Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review., Page 5 of 5 25 V fcen kn PUDA 'HS e October 2O2 Appendix B: Project jest Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) 26 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 1 co,uF•:CoUN i Gi il'fiFa S "E EROPT•` • ‘Nli IA \ ,a� ! ,1-. .55.7 frp.-�J, ` _. ` ,� .'P.._fiN• E i \ii • Ritelli,S POST Et1i$ANCE di A PAP4 I N..{ _, ' —' h > '1 \\ MR 2ONB PG f J I i 1::1 J- ; 11 +cam. ..''i 7, .\ i I 1 I%K� 1 :i 1 f -•c, 1 ' 1 '.-4.',-;::::\;; !0A1 A .,�, .• " I r .s4:-/....:-.:::://f...„.. ,,,..,ENTRANCE 1t) 9+nk' * ..., . ' 1. '-' I r.:; II- ! 1 , ; .., L i i - . ,-,<,- ii --7 5 7.....,. t `: TRAIL ACRES !{ • ' ; ..!ZONING ! 27 Vincenticin PUDA TES- 1,ct'ter 2013 ppendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations (9th Edition) (3 Sheets) 28 Vincentian PUDA TIS-Oct kher 2013 Project Name: VincentianpJD-ApprovedCond. No: Date: 10/912013 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: 9ttt Daily �PA.Foah Hour j PM Doak Fiaur ° I� Land:the t Size 1 I 1 Entry t Exit Entry. I Exit t Entry 1 Exit 820-Shopping Center j. 57.5"V 2370 2369 69 I 42 I 199 215 • Redo ion 1 0 0 0 1 0 ? 0 t 0 • Internal 1a1 140 7 4 I 13 1-5 Pasfi=by. I 323 335 16 9 46 i 51 Non-pass-by = 1.861 1834 46 I 29 I 140 1 149 1 710-General Office ( t l 4 Building 57.5 R) 431 1 431 108 I 15 I 24 4 119 It 1 Reduction 2 r 0 0 1 0 j 0 i 0 Internal ' 65 102 1 I 1 ( 6 I 5 Iii . Pass-by 0 0 0 ! 9 j 0 t 0 N'virpass 5y 366 329 107 iii} 14 18 1 114 210-Single Family 40 r'? 2;26 225 10 {i 28 ( 29 17 Detacfied Housing I { R.eductidn i 0 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 0, '.I it Internal 82 # 86 ((( 3 I 6 { 10 r 9 Ps.-by 0 0 ) 0 0 1 0' I 0 • Non psss:by 144 140 {t 7 22; 1 19 1 Total I 3027 3026 187 85 252 351 Total Reduction 0 0 { 0 i 0 0 ! 0. Total internal 328 328. 11 1 11 1 29 29 total Pass•by 328: f 335 ; 16 I 9 t 46 I 51 L Total Non-pass.by j L 2371 i 2363 L. 160 65 1 172 I 271 3 - (1) 1000 Sq.Feet Gruss Leasable Area . (2) f005 S¢.,Feel Gros§Flaoi Aiea 0 LtveJli.4g units i 29 Vincentian PUDA TIS-October 2013 l _ I3 "' Project Name: Yir, rtien PUD-Prop.Cond.- No: Scenario-1 Date: 10/92013 City: ' StatefProylnce: Zip!Poetal Code: Country: Client Name: • Analyst's Name: Edition: Sth • ! 1 Daily 1 AM Peak Hour PM Pealc Hour Land Use l Size l 1 I Entry 1 Exit • Entry l Exit I Entry l Exit ;• 820-Shopping Center I 190 rn 1 5154 1 5 153 4444 143 $3 , i 442 I h79 Reduction F i 9 0 0 F 0 1 0 0 internal i i 150 ! 136 9 } 3 3 18 1 12 i t s i - ttt • 'ssa-oy # v i iov :::_ n: Non-pass-by 1 i 4222 1 "264. 100 60 315 35G 710-General Office i ai ! o- 24 119 Building 1 57.5 1 4.i 431 108 1 15 Reduction 1 i 0 t 0 i 0 E 0 [ 0 0 • Internal 65 (1 95 1 3 3 7 9 Pass-by G ) 0 R 0 [ 0 G Non-pass-by 1 I 366 3 336 105 1 12 1 17 I 110' 310-Rote! f 100[zl 1 .446' t =416 39 1 25 1 34. f .56 Reduction 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 internal 71 { 85 5 6 5 ] 9 j �� • Pass-by r 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ,. 1 Non-Rags-by 375 1 361 i 34 23 j 29 27 j Total p 6031 6030 1 290 1 131 I 500 ; 634 1 1 i. Total Reduction i 1 1 0 ( 0 1 0 t 0 1 0 S o- -:- Total internal 1 - 316 If 316 t 17 i 77 1 30 { 50 Total Pass-by 1 I 746 I 753 I 34 ! 20 I 106 i 117 Total Non-pass-by i I 4 .9 ; 4961 I 239 ; 364 487 (0) f000Sg.Feet Gross Leasable Area (2) f00)Sq Feet Gross Floor Area () 0cupiedRooms • .l 30 Vincentian PUMA MIS-October 2013 Project Name: Vincantan PUD—Prop:Dond_- No: . Sceriario 2 Date: 10/9/2013 City: i it State/Province; Zip/Postal Code: ; Country: Client Name: Analyst%Name: Edition: 9th !. I Daily 3 AM Peak Hour t PM PeakHour . Land Use f Size f r i t i ! Entry I Exit : Entry i Exit Entry Exit 1 820-shopping Center 1 250 tr) 6160 6.160 1 169 I 104 i 531 Exit r Reduction ;'€ 0 A 0 I 0 U I 0 € Internal ` 0 0 0 ; 0. 0 i 0 i' I Pass-by I ! 924 924 42 i 26 133 [ Non-pass-by I 523.6 5236 1 127 g 398 432 Total 6160 0160 169 i 104 I 531 r 576 ; e Total Reduction 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Total Internal 1 0 0 i 0 1 0 0. 0 Total Pass-by 1 I 924 924 I 42 j 26. 133 ! 144 Total Non-pass-by i, 5236 ; 5236 127 ii 78 1 398 ! 432 (1) 1000 Sq.Feet Gioss L3asable Area 1 31 Vincentiem RADA TIS October 2013 Appendix D: lnterna Yass-by Capturf Exhibits - ,(3 Sheets) 32 Vincention PUDA TIS- October 2013 • . , 1 pnl,at0.13 y , 1 . . 1 . - ■ Leaden tallopplstesi• Site . Ibechriat ft:lad Caw ta 1421 ,- 1 Ci;MO,.-,,k■VA.1 C•yl,r 1,11pLY,?;14.Fel.a.T.c7.:77.1,74 WS E,..A.0.--7---"APtier•rt-riri:441 te,:3,RO.L5t)r,341 • J. 1 ,,,,,.:,.*,,,„,•F:A 153 .915 411 1. F10-47,3.'..7:•ir t•EV-1,3 'LLOA€ F;;;Ir±Fe 61.5 tETT-07,77.RTP.1‘':;•„IZ „1" 1.....t'A T4,-ii:,,i a ,c 1 5.4.,) 419 24 519 40.v.ri,trarRib,,,L,944#1-Int rivre4-1.glInks Fr. 40 ty,---7.-0--n9z-1/443. -ii rg-ihciii4.7a4 I ---' trill,0.7.-,747 a 0 51 20 19 .53 I. 1 • 1 .. lirrfn t-4,,,■,t:k,nit.- ,c, . 1 . I - _ . . - -- . 1 • i , I ! ' lAntril. EntivIt6Seattl A491;1 Enlip E2Itii.E.,taRien adjutt,ftt E...1 ! " . • it: I 710,0•0■.-.2gfnkdEUZ.Z.f.; • t.T.,DP 24 9.—.7'' ' 11,9 I : • 210.5,Ve..raNEV.t.s:ftf,i,10,4-,in, 5-.-14 %....., 17 • - • _______ _. ., _ _ -- ------:----- --- — .irt;ftn.ritts „— 354,ni9•119008 tilms11.4 t,-.1,./.3t coVtarat var.fam trawl Itie tn fte Aft.It clAttl,..X,M.1•0711.,1,1c,fra,t,,ortrp:tint ha:,t-mr,lot.,744 1st V.11::•;144 UV,,322.The Vt5A r..., i4Vrot...41 Try.I.,ro,A to Uts••■■b.:4.140..trl',:al.,I1 195541 E r by refri zctdfA 741,a,:hot pr.00.....-.0,...7.0 4.4 I34 grY,eicc,....0..:::.L-,.,..r .i.......mdr.,-4...-47t.u.-11,5 . 1 iSC:-S..Z in.g.twIsOt- a-un)Et 112F.6 „,_....w,, r. 7:1,,Gatad 0,1x"13-2:1;11;a3 Erl,nt N - Enrrg. 523 rew,:lfe.rj,rz.r.f 7>I.:.) 8175401 4 71--.1,4008 ,1:75-11-4:V) E34 1)9 ----- I Mil-giar,pit-In Center- 210-Sinjlt-F.Zor2v Ottivti Harklg I emt• -.,..),- O.-vn1;W. rirK”5,,,a a...'.•#.. ■ 0,)n,;fie:, ,:^71-11‘(i) €1159 IEnr,r 1:7 et.....794Er054 117.51 51 Dattx..n.-,: 9 09,34.ext. cirt",60 Esit 17 710.531143I-J C91c*Stiil451 n 210-gMit.f.7tia/OklaChat lii:!11($ 1 i 145 119 P,,r,ark ''—'0*ci) E39....1. 1 C.,..,31,7rLre ri -.,01 Emil 2,1 a-- 1 . _ --.._ EnIt03754011154-..,, rty 10 . i 07 . 05159415 Z., 04,ArclE,L „5_13-it” ac-a :I . 1 • 1 . • i QM,StnIPP5513 CNtrix . . I 'Monti illps -----... —,--- .Eitanti trips 1 1 i tqpig Trigs I . 1 ft-C,:ntra(Mi.naiEng I 2ft.r.,,,p10-.artgly0clachc1 I —T.', flotmlna L, 1 I ‘..* --...^....-------------- I Eroy *----7661747* -,iii.i" 1 -TiTs'""-m ---1---14313 1 ,T3(V‘.7 ' Esit ...1_ .. 2544843) :_.. 4 crii s ri.1 I 15359.) i 115155178.1 I. 1°'J ..i.,. tft(100%) , I4('4) I .-- ...,n, — I 22 49%1,.. L-....-- .44'.9 1991:4 .....,..--. , • • 799-Conceal effim 2tlikans - r i 1 . i Told TriF= Extaral T.ti ..)-2t*-Trnaln.F4niiIrOnftft=a---I TotO 1,_ Vs-sin,ffing Carter 1 I ',mans --ThWry—7------ii(laay.) * ----Ta3r-------7571-a----t----757-17-7----T-- s„, 1 1 i Edt. 1441,10115) 0,;40 I trt) I 4(439 2140534 147(IMIt) i„.. =1:7-1 ------I — • In 02-7-4--- -----I -----..-- 1 21.-§,ngtafTYPIVRCI8VIUM No:Wno I i 1 F_ 1015114595195 1 I , 1 Tata TO, 054- enfoA:7 I 7111-omen.OffIco994.inii--E ;;:1-----7--1 e.k.....-: __...... ----t------r.----— iiiaiiii-- 1—----17,74 _ i P'S) 17(53043 0)5177 9.9':-:9 10 tit%1 1 Istae-F ' L 307.") ...... —1:...-:::--i....,,,iv ----!------.7.5-s) __I-.--7----51-z_ ,_ --------__ ! , i I . Exte9.1I.* 1 90:0*O14oinmaam.cf.;= 4::met cle:Lentl U..TM rgorool bt maht.steem Ye icast R....L..3r,-,i Egrat-.17ear.fins Ihnpmr.it,ut u,s.1...1.TO 54,-.11-4 3triree,r..01.5"o i i • 1 T. 1.01)S2.1 u el:,-,7 tx e•,nt"it.1?+e Pitt:-t 9-424f47.•,*-1 fr.:::',E a5 1-,n4 III WY ttsrlo!,-;...0.41.”--75449.%'.114T 9.5(1)1■I447,08r...se 1 ! , I « LorrOtvft Eatinn4 letift Prerifte, Pass.by'Ceps ifiroR...-ttr Tra.. ; '. ,21 itis2971. 5T. 21.4 i i 9 .1154407908 955.9 9:.9. Onrbi 60-s in ? ..c, 0 al I .119•git"(5 -5-a.:10■1t55-1 1 if r.,,s,,..3 :::7 o . 7; i• , • - • - . 33 . . Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 .......... • - . •__ , 1 ,,,,.,..,,,„, v.,,,.:tf011+04.;:•-•xl..407.7.7A.,, I .n,,,I:00-:. 1;71707-71f70:-....._....„..-----.":*__.----":1 . I :004.fte 10:910.ixtVai-:.111E :2t 10.:00.0 iv.; 7,411.0,7 a7.7 77,4: 7•.:0 f 177.040,4:-1...•,17 A.-, 10001.00.!Wt.=141 00 3---0-0.;-.7-;;;(+7 7 _.,.._- F,Zi1W4r.:r..;16 I. 1.-(I)00-471.1:4`731 ,. 4.0 07_1 a.,iii•-itn.SC,7,W` 1!-Eq‘i;Tq.;1-1.0 32:3 14;:tki?;II.......7•••-.1.26 - 11,1ricu'o ' te' to 4.1.444•17:•E S; 45.0 0:7 1 I I.•••'z it,•I:701 E37..0.777.7.777.4 Fit':7."07.31.77K, 60 I L 0.7 77. • . . . I ' --. — - • • ——....—..-..- —...,...----,--— ____.., .j 1 ■ 1 • 1 f.'"'10'4*I''44011.'''.4"/Wb..4114..4e•=12,401"1.0-^•.,f''..4,0-a,,..1t40:•, •44,.$4,ft'4 0.*44-e'4.g.r.1 Pik.vdsztrr;4,---444'4,4Ai.4.4:4,-.4---,Tilte4a.4.-Pg..,VI Je .64,1,,,s e,,,, I 1 L 03373 3.e...,,i7A1‘334 *4 rl-.4 Fr.,L-I3 RAR:41:o.1 .-3,Ir:sl al I I -31 /3,V3n.F..ife,f le 3,_-_,.:3 • -,Q rtz 41 1 1 ....-,, ,,-3•,',.r-3.34^...Z.,',7 4,15,7% ta F....?' it3. I II i I I .• ------------_—___J --------------_____-----_---- ....____ _ :..-77•101-7 ■ . . l . 1 $111*s&UP!l,ts:Aitt 1,4 40.1.70.40.170 0t 7.44:-....t..ik;NI■....7.,,,,....,.d...,,,,m.w.L...i t...!,Th;ter......v7i0,0.1 77;p 00 1.0.0.14.; : .I -440..7 0:••:.-...0.,#4..4--.3.4 NI:a:EA 7r7-,7*,.ma st,:att tvdlas Ta,,v...4437,!4,..e43,E.s 4,..14.4 0.: ..••!3 iZVI-Sioppign Cr$40, . 7 t0-Ovu.r.44-1,..,g0t0.0,0 I r ad 40. 1 0er...01 EA WT.:0•ii`,) 0 404-41Enti4..1717.01J . " 2.471t4t,7 Zn.-.414:3 0 0 tr004 f.r. a).cr) 6 07 2.4 I 1 4231-Sttepoirs3*mitt 333-:MR i 3,3 4,1 et=-../F....t. F.--',1...M 8.3,3c,-..1.•1 P;/5.3,11 Ver.'ir'R Ri ex,/ IP ', ,,,,....,,.. Its ■ . '710-Gera-41 offtERIZROR 33.1,Ut. 1 tn. 6,?,:1112. U.);$1) F.S'LlittZ 0 0>C4c1E,r6 ,134(0) _4-■ ;S-177 24 0001.01-!--440.iii.,._15 CO 1•401.4:0 77.7.7:41•t. 07:::•0€;) Ea I'.I I ' ' ! . . 1 31".4iPkgr"04t 1 701.0 Tlipz i-..- Wen,'13V3 . , E.RwarAllif.s ' I- , — i— 1 733.Ge-..-301W3-33."...3 I . ---r■,-- .,- , 20.4) .I 331,43) 1 —. . .tr.,. _70iI—'-•i ., 041(10-571. ,. _ J....___ ___... . ,_,....._,,,,,,,t.....,... 1 - --------- •-- iHa-GiFitr-30.Tr...0116±4.1111 I ■ 1 1 1- • Ethel • Z0(0Vil.) i 7(44:43 WO "-- ‘..."". • ----CilZ-i----.'-'-( - . Ifaiir" i 1 7..._SA . 4•4043r.449 941440 i OLI33) 99,) i. „ ..,...,....- .... --.^-*--- .1. T070 r----.:4,--wizi---.--„--77-, - -1- coy) mum —..;- •---S-c)., - i 1 1 I ' ,iv...trad I i I mi.,T,;;,.1 1 Nwrotrfp3 • ......_, Eir,01140 I '-— n t r.0,..0 0 i-0 C I -44,44-4.4,4 ox...ito,e.pg 1-473 -— r '■ 0074.; ( 0(6..) ■ .1.0.7.37) i . -- ..... _ "Q") .1 .....:101.17.) 0 G0) ,_I 05.:,'J_ _ 1_,, _ ,,,.2noij --i •t 7.it j movn ■ rvt) j i...1 j RI(CVO 1..-..-...,.....,..,,-........-. ---..,-.....,--„....-....-.......-...............-.—. .,..-. . - ... --.. ... . ..-. -- - - - ---.,--.... ..-•.- , - ...-.. ...--....--...-., -1 I . ! ' ,5.;13,4335,4 I I S;.-.6,0,4.,,r44147.,,P.•4•-•64-4'1',......i n 77'.,;1.0`0•040-7.;00.01407•;IIt.0.4 tc-0 0..1101 rimies Whil3S3.24.1 tt■n:::d 3 W.V......1 At..4 0,0.1:we. I • 1 • I, TrIkle"0-.7•III.,7-400 i.,3v4,0`.*.4,10,d 01 g:*004 tr WC.tr44-4 44.4 4,4A:haws i 7...lbra;,3,ht11.4.7a3 f .41/tr= , . I 1 ,..1:0-ittrp.kg Ctfilt :7.i•0....40**0.-- I_04 1.7.-e te3.133.1r:23 :It 1Z, L-0 P0:a110 7, 0 .s .3;113 77.0-00 77170 rg 0 . 1100V.-,07 440, d4: 11.1 tt ! I . • - -. . :5- 34 . Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 ---, 15'roject Name: Vincentian PUD-Prdp..Cont..-Scenario 2 ,...;,...77........---.....--._...-1 . 1 i• I ' Analysis Name: b-10 Peek Hour 1 i Lida L1SO tridePeadera Varfibl - Size Tirife-Periciti Method Entry Exit Total _ Shopping t1 060 S q.Feat Oral-.fCif 1 250 WeekttaY:Eyeat Figur 121 Beet Fit(LOG)E e_ . ; . • center — l LAM=6.67Ln(X)+3.3:1 531 576 1107 I I , Tie RectuttiOil '.• . ; Specify-a p:ercentaget by:which:the Entry Trip.and.. ii Trip will be reduced for each LandUs@-.-ITO reduction is,apptied to 01? _ EntrY Trip--and Exit Trip.fram the previous section,To record any notes,click'-f-' Add Notes above. I t Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusteci-Entni Exit RedUetien Adjusted Exit I t e-----h 1-7-1 ,---.... 62G-Shopping Center 10 Plo 531 10 flb 576 j .._...— . . 1 3 gxtenial Thps r: r. eeff,r-the Percentage of Pass-bytrips far etch Land lie.The piercentage will be:redUced from the total number of External i . f!ig tom the previoeS4eOtiorf_to record-any-notes,click-e.Add Notes above. The?icon preceding:tile Pass-by%valueindiCates.dataproyidalhy WE.ClicKrig-:the lain changesacustorn Pass y% valrreJo data provided by frE. 820-Shoppihg Center Use EXte mai Trips Pass-b 1107 y% Pa -by rip 0 c5 fick isien-p ass-by ttr TS v. 277 Tript 530 1 • • -----. _. 35 Vir centiarg PIMA TIS e (t sober 2013 Appendix Eo Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) 36 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 a zm � o ` ce N re N "" ,, iu 1-- I— '31R w I W W i _ F= r.'"' '1'",". * . 7 * R In uj Z W * W F r • e re J W L_ F Zia *o e tx,_ F * W F• W II 0 w E •` c ' w f d . 1 e • W w Z 1- us+ #• Z W Z ill W p ck W ga or Z tu s . z 1 - ' w W • 1 j o H m 37 Vincentfcin PUDM ITS- October 2013 1 r-1 N 1.1 Z m 3 F_ � � 1 . tiC,4 F- ca lai• i— 2 8 .. Ce IR W § IL F- F- N ltl 7 O. - Z N C" Ed. r:". " WWI — F= O. ,, Pte. Y 01 A 111 F X co• - .: 14 W ' Z r • e- UJ 4 I s • • N _ • D /1/* N..).1 '12 l' .- ' O • - w r N __,z LLI v F Z 47 ' ,• Z -. Z a N Z IN {LI W _ Z 1 R� � , Z W Z ?[. . . FL . . . 1-_ N 1 - og N O , _ . ........ 38 r w -8 i � z I , N to o 0 z Z 0 co --.�[ --■•gyp ' 6 o ® Q J W U I N IL ua W Q r. w = ~ CCZN �G O JZw � 0 o � o 13 W F- z ® N 00w / N!I ca co -5 O Z I-- Z CO u- CL ft"® Q Jw 111....** • _,- '\\ , . c- a Cg • '0,/ 4 / N I:•�' 1 ♦ ° . -•! ' - a - o\1 � ,j • _ 2 xct ■ t - s� " : \0v ■ ♦iIIIIIIIIItsit•. ,140e,�Irgis■d �,�ialIMIIIIIIIIIMIIITMINI6 •�' ________. ,. . �O x it g f .,■,, 8 LLI u_ (0._. ,._ - • I - .$I W a CO` /__ U H O N 2 47 �.�.'O'C a. 721111 �ITO' il x I 121.-1111111161 i1 W o , El Y iq :11 '5 -‘ T .Ja O \ ri � a ` 0.. W = 1 � 1 0 0 ' L Y.1 Z = M M M14 a m °rI, N---"" j NI )V1 Lu °1�J/1111111111111r or / L�\J AN am ism IN ow rrrr rdz. al i■ • : . El_o 1 '4° I , LN 1 � > . 4 --iiiir al .c): al z 8 ♦ • ♦ ♦ 0 * � w 4:4 CO 5 �� ♦� n z zw_ LiL,J J2 ~ ❑ (LriJ\') L7 ` `♦ ` \ AL— 1 :4 s ,♦ 1111 cC Al A. , LL ____ :, 2 ��m � of , -- m_ ®®®a 9 I HOLE MONTES i-� ENGINEERS•PLANNERS•SURVEYORS July 1, 2014 950 Encore Way•Naples,Florida 34110•Phone 239.254.2000•Fax:239.254.2099 Re: Vincentian GMPA (PL-20130001767, CP-2013-10) PUD Amendment(PL-2013-0001726) HM File No.: 2013.043 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. on behalf of the property owner, have made two concurrent applications to Collier County. These applications include (1) a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to change the future land use of the subject site from Urban, Mixed Use District,Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict,to Urban,Mixed Use District, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict; and (2) to amend the Vincentian PUD to change the zoning classification from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district, to allow construction of a maximum of 360 residential dwelling units, or up to 250,000 gross square feet of commercial land uses, or a combination thereof, which may include a hotel limited to 150 rooms, and/or an assisted living facility. These lands total 30.681 acres and are located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, approximately 1.5 miles west of the intersection of County Road 951 (Collier Boulevard) and U.S. 41 East, in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of U.S. 41 East and Southwest Boulevard. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this amendment and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Thursday, July 17, 2014 at 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting Room "A", 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway,Naples,Florida 34113. Should you have questions prior to the meeting,please feel free to contact me at 239-254-2000. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES,INC. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Director of Planning RJM/sek *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. Naples• Fort Myers AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 1st day of July, 2014 by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. i-tvkwip vme4 (Signature of Notary Public) (Notary Seal) Stephanie Karol Printed Name of Notary �::`!Y% STEPHANIE KARQf~, =i4 _ _�. (� :� MY COMMISSION it EE 163504 ,,1 EXPIRES:March 9,2016 4,13E ¢.' Bonded Tbru Notary Public Underwriters t iIVBIG (B°ORHO Dl. :- y� INFORMATI. N}MBT3ING•, , ..,, ne , arc to e p bll is mvD, to atte:_ .-- ig .'o rhood�meeting__e1d byRRobe J M Iheze,• NAPLES DAILY NEWS 3 ontes lnc'n r, D' ano ich' Es,uir of'Cole Y� ICP�oft-�oJe f ma , ovanov� Published Daily b P P e �, ch;&Koesfer�.PA`o a afofthe* roe owne_taw 0,_,..„ location�� Naples,FL 3411 D t Y � � -., S 4 i1 . " e • b. uIsda'd I 1 014 at 5° 0 p I - , f% , A ' z� �'Col(ie•``own South Regr.ni ,11-b'a''ry M- ''d R,1om'A'; r•Affidavit of Publican : ` x 80655 L��efy Cultu afar a ,Na®les ,,i.11-9-71--.:dar34113 d fi� a . c ' 5 F"t - �:-A- - F c_ ?A*. -r ' 411 State o- Florida ,.e '44' =- k .. 4_ . p ,� r o csu re t=ormal appIrcationsahavebee� a ade„to Collier Count es�appIIca r. ' x.” xs' '„a - �f:e S AS. a-s Asa,. , ;-i ai.q Counties of Collier and Lee tOt�siL•w ei!, -Growth anagerrrenty a endment(G�MPA ®o a Beth fut r �z d use- the,.•eJe site from Cl�rbanL e s ®ism IIJr©an Gaas al F.rt g ! ,�ubdi,,V_ o tuba MIx3 se�®st c ,an fixed )Rn: �ub is nct � � Before the undersigned they serve as t ' :� Y to;= n®�tha Pisa la"n �® o c ange �e= ons:e olas�si nation=fro ,'9�Ian e, U appeared Daniel McDermott who on e o®' e P d a m a Is ric-o a e e - P a e❑ed =n tkDE�e re_ape (MP Inside Sales Manager of the Naples D 'o a,mg districtro al�owrconstruc ion o 1 ' ' esi o enn ''''t'., Yd el ingy l�Y, or:up 0250 DOD,g oss sefiee�t oho �m ciali, ,,_,9_,.a es or a ao bination f , o,,t newspaper published at Naples, m Co rich may:inclu a hote:Ii ited to 50=.0o nd n anss s ed ing aci y1r � distributed in Collier and Lee counties �� y, , p �� ; - : ,= ;, " �t ,• attached copy of the advertising;being • : e! ds total 30 68+.acres d ar e 6 te•=i Se Jon- 2,_Township•AD South Range 26 Eastflfr a e �Ykl o ;raw es est of fhe Intersec 1 �-, Ate , r� E PUBLIC NOTICE -4tion of County Road • Co Bert o e+a® ndt dit as-IRA e southeast quad ��.�i-�iv r�a "3s� y ^ws L s'�"`.a ��1�' �'-�� t.✓ &., p•k.x.:. �.+ � � c s rant of the intersec ion of U S 41 East♦a,d Southwest Bou evarc a.1 N x ` j :0a1 ' sue^vi s; C 4 - K- i �#gys 7 ;' �r .=ai 5 d '^ i 4l i4 :MW . l=A 0 J�I.t,W , 4 `F.0 •m the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE a , °R '�°� � , '3 , . 4 "HI� � $f '+� ""'� „i ��e .y,�� ,�, , T rs�. ti.�"��1, >� was published in said newspaper 1 tim� z t � - t �4p _on July 1,2014. � ._ , 4,,; -..- x '`ZSiTfILA � -� CPS i 1 t Affiant further says that the said Na � '` ash �� published at Naples in said Collier Co �' y �� -` $ �` ` iitt 4 i newspaper has heretofore been continue �� : y 7 �' ¢ x -000- County,Florida; distributed in Collier �� , .- � � Yx..:�-�' ,� ,,� iK � � to��''� vex each day and has been entered as secon°r* ' , ti,. ,. " �'- ,� 't5t .4f k F e a+ sue• r s, -� ��'3' t\,,.rt office in Naples,in said Collier County ,� � ��.��t, � �, ��4 z ._ � �,year next preceding the first publication b _ 9� ,;,, ,5�� gi '�`"' �, � 't � ti• a 2r� ��z�:. cb `S z ; advertisement and affiant further says s t - . °« ':{ .� 4; promised any person firm or corporatie fi '� E-,a LUEYeUti INPUT , commission or refund for the purpose o `� Yr - f �` _ publication in the said newspaper �t �� • a Y , � g Business`an s property owners,reside _sandlvisitors a[e weld e to atend the pre ` �______� t J j.'d Lollie Co`ii as f ou are son a e n'r � e e e ®ro - i.QT�i e'�t� ne�a ,a � � �, ,.' Y;y ;�- ° $ g -e o b ionsro corn en e' can be dl Bated una' e o en a fie kav . 3 ,. 4: , _ i I One o al L--- ' z� € w, � c F 1 t ,c= b eat � � a w a (Signature of affiant) s, _ �"'",.-.1 .2-7=4;.p.„1:..,7-r.57:-,,,,,k-.:- --7,5;i, st x� a xy ti Robert sM Ihere '1C �Di ectorpf Pta yoi, g _ ' >w f �t ,- 3x� `t w ., .`z oie MO T;'InC <G -.�$ S rn to and u scrlb}led before me t x , `' 95o En o e]�V ao es Flonj34 1 0 c z :„ r }' '4" one 239 54 2De0r Dob1 Ihere7C�hmeng co S 3rd da o Jul) 014 ; ;,k ``i-:- ,-. , :-s-; � �s�� J / l please Role thatthe Collie'County f'ublie Libra does not sponsor or endorse this{program jir+l > 'v a�-3fi',]- _ j nGF�.,£ 4�- r X 4,y.r t`j, iS'�-a roil .. ■ �/ w� }� i �' Julyl 2014 (Signature of notary public) .No 23113Oe8a Y>� CAROL POLIDORA _*`' -_= MY COMMISSION#EE 851758 ..�"� EXPIRES:November28,2014 • -of F:0' Bonded Thru Pichaid Insurance Agency =Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ 111.11111111 Bend along line to A`/ERY®5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up Edges j 1 300 PORTER STEEET REALTY TRUST 331 BENSON ST LADN TRUST 331 BENSON STREET LAND TRUST 32 NICHOLS ST C/O PIKUS PROPERTY MANAGMENT C/O PIKUS PROPERTY MANAGMENT SWAMPSCOTT,MA 01907--1034 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY ■•••■ NAPLES,FL 34116-0000 NAPLES,FL 34116---0000 ADAM JR,GLORIA A=&FREDERICK ADAMSKI,RICHARD D ADEE,JAMES A ' 2926 REEDY RD JANE D ADAMSKI SHARON ADEE . SINKING SPRING,PA 19608-9621 14700 S M 43 HWY 12228 HARBOR OAKS DR , HICKORY CORNERS,MI 49060-9709 MACHESNEY PARK,IL 61115-1046 AFFORDABLE WHISTLERS COVE LTD AGUAYO,ESTEBAN=&TERESA AGUILERA,LILIAN 1275 LAKE HEATHROW LN STE 115 289 BENSON ST 339 BENSON ST • HEATHROW,FL 32746-4398 NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 AI_GER,JOYCE ALLEN EST,JAMES R ALLEN,PAUL E=&SARAH P 2 ARAPAHO TRL CAROLE F ALLEN 1 NATCH-iEZ TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7977 : 3 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7969 NAPLES,FL 34113-7990 ALMEIDA,ANTONIO=&MARIA ANDERSON,NORMAN E=&BEVERLY J ANDERSON,TERRANCE N 14 1/2 WHITSBOURGH ST PAUL E=&HEATHER LANDERSON 285 BENSON ST TAUNTON,MA 02780-1916 11227 OAKLEIGH DR NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 MIDDLEVILLE,MI 49333--8792 ANDREWS,PIERRE ANTHONY,WILLIAM E APARICIO,ANTONIO A=&NIVIA M CHRISTINE M ROBBINS DEANNA B ANTHONY 294 PORTER ST 13 BUTTERFIELD TRL 1 ABILENE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 NAPLES,FL 34113-7901 NAPLES,FL 34113-7945 ARNDT,FRANKT ARROYO,JAMIE AUBIN,MICHELLE CINDE LOU KAVAN 2415 HARPER STREET SERGE PAQUETTE 20 OSAGE TRL TAMPA,FL 33605-0000 19 OSAGE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113-7971 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 B S&M L POWERS JT R/L TRUST BADILLO,RICARDO F BALLMAN JR,WILLIAM JAMES 7922 KINGS RIDGE CIR ADRIANA LABRA BADILLO ROSALIE MARIE BALLMAN FAIRBORN,OH 45324-1874 135 3RD ST 27 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--8551 NAPLES,FL 34113---7943 BANK OF AMERICA BARNHART,ROY J=&CARMEN A BARRY,WALLACE J=&LAURI A 101 E KENNEDY BLVD 205 BENSON ST 7137 S COUNTY ROAD A TAMPA,FL 33602-5179 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 - SUPERIOR,WI 54880--0000 BEKESY,ILONA H BELCHER,LARRY M=&SANDY L BERGER TR,MITCHELL M HERSFELDER STRASSE 37 JEFFREY MICHAEL BELCHER JOSEPH M BERGER LIVING TRUST D-36088 NANCY ELIZABETH TUTTLE JEAN CLAUDE BERGER HUENFELD 107 STONEWALL DR 109 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD GERMANY, D36088-0000 SAVANNAH,GA 31419-3272 NAPLES,FL 34113-7960 Etiquettes faciles a peter i Repliez a la hachure afin de 1 www.avery com 1 Ili ii...7 In naharit A%/FRV®S1Kf1® ! ,Sens de - rAkrAlpr IP rehord Poo-Iles ! 1-800-GO-AVERY ! =Easy Peel®Labels i • 1.1111.111 Bend along line to I AVERY®5160®, \-3 Use Avery®Template 5160® A Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge"' j j BERGERON,FERNAND BERIAULT ET AL,DENIS BLAIS,GERALD NINE DESMEULES 27 ARAPAHO TRL MICHELINE SCOTT BLAIS DES BOULEAUX NAPLES,FL 34113--7951 1905 ST JACQUES DRUMMONDVILLE,QC ,NTREAL,QC . CANADA, H1B 5L2--0000 CANADA, J2B 7S7-0000 BOGGS,LESLIE A BOLAND FAMILY TRUST BOLDUC,RICHARD A 1394 RIDGECREST CT 224 BENSON ST MARY E BOLDUC FAIRBORN,OH 45324--5912 NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 69 HIGH ST ASSONET,MA 02702-1706 BOND, SANDRA G BOND,DARLENE M BOUCHARD,DIANE ANDREWS 8 CHISHOLM TRL HOWARD J BOND JEAN-YVES BOUCHARD NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 23 CHEYENNE TRL STEVE BOUCHARD NAPLES,FL 34113-7943 3 PECOS TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113-7952 BOUCHARD,DIANE ANDREWS BOUR,PATRICIA J BOURGET,LUCIEN C=&THERESA J JEAN-YVES BOUCHARD BRUCE E PAGE 31 CIMMARON TRL 6 ARAPAHO TRAIL 12409 FOX RUN CT NAPLES,FL 34113-7933 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 HUNTLEY,IL 60142---7418 BOUTIN,ROLLANDE BOWDEN,BEVERLY E BOYLE,ELIZABETH ROBERT BOUCHER RUTH R EISELE 103 TAHITI CIR ,-QHANTAL DOUVILLE 12 CIMMARON TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113-4010 'EGOS TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 \PLES,FL 34113--7952 BRAFFORD,WARD BRANDON,TIMOTHY R=&SHELBY J BREAU,EVELYN FREEDA BRAFFORD 15 MULESHOETRL 225 BENSON ST 2810 E CREEKS EDGE DR NAPLES,FL 34113-7947 NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 BLOOMINGTON,IN 47401-8381 BREAU,EVELYN BREAU,EVELYN BRIONES,ELADIO 225 BENSON ST 225 BENSON ST 272 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 • BRISSON,DIANE J BROUSSEAU,CHARLES EDOUARD BROWN,EDWARD H 11 ABILENE TRAIL MARIELLE PELLETIER DAVID BROWN NAPLES,FL 34113--7945 48 RUE VERLAINE 1 PECOS TRL RICHELIEU,QC NAPLES,FL 34113-7952 CANADA, J2W 1 R7-0000 BULFRANO,LORA BULMER,MALCOLM BUNCH SR,DAVID G=&GWENDOLYN 120 3RD ST 4 CHEROKEE TRL 319 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8535 NAPLES,FL 34113-7916 NAPLES,FL 34113-8556 CADER,DOROTHY E CAIN EST,ANN M CAMPANELLO,ANGELO B=&DIANE M 36 ABILENE TRL RICHARD W CAIN 141 1ST ST NAPLES,FL 34113--7900 14 SPANISH TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8533 NAPLES,FL 34113-7948 • Etiquettes faciles a paler 1 A Repliez a la hachure afin de I www averycom • Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ 11111 Bend along line to /��RV® 5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® � Feed Paper �mi expose Pop-Up EdgeT"' j 1 CAPPS,JAMES A=&CONSTANCE A CAREY,RALPH W CARLS,DAVID W 347 BENSON ST#A CHARLOTTA B CAREY GENE RAE CARLS NAPLES,FL 34113--8556 30020 DEER HARBOUR DR 30 ABILENE TRAIL ," SALISBURY,MD 21804-2509 NAPLES,FL 34113---9654 • CARMIGNANI,WILLIAM B CARTWRIGHT,MARGARET CATERINI,WILLIAM=&VERONICA HONG THITHU NGUYEN 315 BENSON ST PO BOX 108 208 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8556 ROSCOE,PA 15477-0108 NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 CAVANAGH,LAWRENCE J=&MARYANN CHACE,ANITA I CHANCELLOR,MARIANNA 109 2ND ST 20 CHEYENNE TRL 126 BRADFORD PL NAPLES,FL 34113--8550 NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 MT WASHINGTON,KY 40047-8117 r�IARC! CONNIE CIOCCO,SAMUEL R v rir=ii�Z i i ti{,NU:YGG:_.L .,�:..,.....,�.__..._ 24 ABILENE TRL DEBORAH B PASINI PATRICIA ANN CIOCCO NAPLES,FL 34113-7970 88 AMBASSADOR DR 16 MEADE DR UNIT A LATROBE,PA 15650-1061 MANCHESTER,CT 06042--0000 . CLARKE,JEFF CLEMONS,LINDA COLLIER CNTY JANET DIPASQUALE 302 BENSON ST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2348 HUCKLEBERRY RD NAPLES,FL 34113-8505 WATER SEWER MANCHESTER,NJ 08759-6124 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E t� NAPLES,FL 34112-4961 COLLIER CNTY COLLISS,ROY=&SHIRLEY COOK,CLINTON E BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THOMAS K=&KAREN COLLISS PATSY M COOK UTILITIES DIVISION 12 APACHE TRL LOT 303 69487 BANNOCK RD 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E#H-3 NAPLES,FL 34113-7965 SAINT CLAIRSVILL,OH 43950-9776 NAPLES,FL 34112-4961 COOK,NORMAN CORNMAN,JAMES E=&NANCY A CRISCILLO,GERALDINE TERRY=&ROSALIE PHILLIPS 13 CIMMARON TRL 1 CIMMARON TRL 815 W MAHONEY RD NAPLES,FL 34113-7914 NAPLES,FL 34113--7986 BRASHER FALLS,NY 13613-4258 CRISP,BARBARA CUBESMART L P CUMMINS,DAVANI 6881 WOOD LAKE CIR PTA-CS#451 .4260 JACK FROST CT APT 5 =O:JNG HARRIS,GA.30582--1615 ,— PO BOX 320099 • . N,PUSS,FL..134112-5242 \10 rg Hr r r∎stOl f1 3oS8�-WS ALEXANDRIA,VA 22320-0000 • CURLEY,RICHARD L=&THERESSA M CURTON,JAMES E CWALT ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 3 BILL ST F BERNICE CURTON %ALDRIDGE CONNORS LLP DERRY,NH 03038-5260 • 10106 PORTAGE RD 1615 S CONGRESS AVE#200 PORTAGE,MI 49002--7281 DELRAY BEACH,FL 33445--0000 DAVIS TR,KENNETH L DAVIS,CHARLES N DAVIS,HORTENSE L K LYLE DAVIS REVOCABLE TRUST 322 PORTER ST 23 ABILENE TRL 2977 PALMETTO CT NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 NAPLES,FL 34113-7945 DUNEDIN,FL 34698--9663, Etiquettes faciles a paler ; Repliez a la hachure afin del www avery cOm ', ! Sens de • t_-z.-_._—L_....s...._.,..TM I a_znn_nn_oMFRV 1 Easy Peel®labels i ♦ IMMO Rend along line to 1 10 AVERY®5160® I Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge"' 1 1 DAVIS,LARRY E DAVISON,ERNEST DE LATORRES,ROBERTO PINERO ' "QUELINE J DAVIS MARK DAVISON ET AL XIOMARA CRUZ 'ACHE TRL 22526 BEECH ST 475 SOUTHWEST BLVD .1LES,FL 34113-0000 DEARBORN,MI 48124--2735 NAPLES,FL 34113--8528 DE LEON,JAIME J DE VILLERS,JOHN DE VRIES,ROGER=&DONNA J 147 1ST ST VANDA DE VILLERS 2521 REVELATION LN NAPLES,FL 34113--8533 DIANE DEVILLERS ROCKFORD,IL 61109-3777 16 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7922 DEMPSEY,HUGH J DEONARINE,KELVIN DESFORGES,GILLES JANET MCGIRL 3764 KENT DR LUCILLE BONNEAU DESFORGES 241 HILLSIDE AVE NAPLES,FL 34112---3740 SYLVAIN DAIGNEAULT CRANFORD,NJ 07016-3409 6 OREGON TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 DICE,JOHN N DIIOIA,DAVID MICHAEL=&ADELE DITTRICH,WILLIAM 8 APACHE TRAIL 808 GOLDEN MEADOW RD ETHEL DITTRICH NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 EAGAN,MN 55123-1964 26 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 DOMINGO-MIGUEL,MIGUEL PASCUAL DROZD,RONALD J=&JOAN S DUMAS,MAURICE R SANDRA MARTINEZ 2 AHL AVE TRLR 21 JEANNE 0 DUMAS X24 PORTER ST ALBANY,NY 12205-2863 290 BILLINGS ST PLES,FL 34113-8542 QUINCY,MA 02171-1804 E JEAN NIGRO EAST,BRIAN C=&MELISSA A EBANKS,DALE GARY J NIGRO 483 EVERGREEN DR 5218 GILCHRIST ST 51 PHILLIPS DR TALLMADGE,OH 44278-1356 NAPLES,FL 34113-7728 OLD BRIDGE,NJ 08857-2428 . EBANKS,DALE EBANKS,MARLON ECKL,SARA S 5218 GILCHRIST ST 5218 GILCHRIST ST DIANNA SHUST - NAPLES,FL 34113---7728 NAPLES,FL 34113--7728 6 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7971 ELGART EST,CHRISTINE EMELANDER,SYDNEY B ENDERS,JERRY L %DAVID A ELGART PR JANICE F EMELANDER LOIS L MORROW j . I : 12 ARAPAHO TRL LOT 315 120 4Tf ''T. /1140' ��~� PO BOX 1k5 ��6J�=-6`y GAYLORD,MI 49734--0145 NAPLES,FL 34113---7977 NAPLES,FL 34113-8536 FALATO,DAVID=&ZENAIDA FEENEY,MICHEL FELLER TR,CYNTHIA H 130 2ND ST GAETANE NADEAU EARL F FELLER TR NAPLES,FL 34113-8534 1575 LOUIS CARIER#606 UTD 5/31/00 MONTREAL,QC 1710 TREMONT ST �� CANADA, H4N 2Z7--0000 DOVER,OH 44622-1075 FEREZA,ANDRA FINCH,MARION FISHER,ROBERT D=&ETHEL M 1673 MANDARIN RD 6057 N OLD 41 3 ARAPAHO TRL NAPLES,FL 34102-5139 VINCENNES,IN 47591--7556 NAPLES,FL 34113---7981 • Etiquettes faciles a peler ■ r_A Repliez a la hachure afin del www.avery com I Easy Peel®Labels 1 ♦ =MI Bend along line to AVERY®5160® 1 Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge"' j 1 FLOOD,DONNAJ FLORIDANN LLC FLORIDIMMO LLC 27 CIMMARON TRL 2633 LONGBOAT DR 2633 LONGBOAT DR NAPLES,FL 34113--7914 NAPLES,FL 34104--0000 NAPLES,FL 34104-3329 ��, FONTES,DIOSDADO FOURNIER,PAUL FOWLER,DON A=&LA VERNE DALIA FONTES LISE DARCY 332 BENSON ST SANDRA FONTES 8 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--8505 16 CHISHOLM TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7971 NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 FOX,RAYMOND A FRESHOUR,CLAYTON GAINES,DONALD P 3 CHEYENNE TRL 204 PORTER ST CAROLYN D GAINES NAPLES,FL 34113-7943 NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 4070 NEW COLUMBIA RD CAMPBELLSVILLE,KY 42718-0000 L_,GHERTR K not GALLEGOS.MARINA GIRARD ET AL,ROBERT MARGARET M GALLAGHER TR 217 BENSON ST 12 ABILENE TRAIL KEVIN&MARG GALLAGHER TRUST NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 NAPLES,FL 34113---7961 UTD 12/28/0517 SPANISH TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7984 GLEN,MARVIN GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES GOBER TR,ROBERT E SHIRLEY MARIE HEISTAND 2614 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 615 KATHLEEN T GOBER TR 2985 HARRIS RD SE NAPLES,FL 34103-4409 GOBER FAMILY REV TRUST PORT ORCHARD,WA 98366-2344 UTD 10/21/109 AL ST DERRY,NH 03038-5270 �� GONZALEZ,EDUARDO GORANSON,PHYLLIS M GORGES,DIETER=&PHYLLIS 320 BENSON ST 39 CIMMARON TRL STACY A VELD NAPLES,FL 34113--8505 NAPLES,FL 34113-7933 DIETER H GORGES JR 41 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7933 GRAHAM,JAMES J=&BETTY L GRANDAL,MERCEDES L GREINER,CYNTHIA S 35 ARAPAHO TRL CESAR A HERNANDEZ-CRUZ 22 APACHE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7951 28 CHISHOLM TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7965 NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 GRETHER,GARY W=&BELINDA K GRETHER,MARY RUTH GRIMES,JOE A=&MARJORIE E 6084 HUNTINGTON WOODS DR • RANDAL P GRETHER 1550 CHESAPEAKE AVE • NAPLES,FL 34->12A-12g83' • • . -14 z,• 1 NAVAJO TRL . NAPLES,FL 3410.2 -0514— ' . , NAPLES,FL 34113-7990 GUERRA,AURORA D GUERRA,MANUEL GUY,PAULA L 2290 SW 132 AVE 2290 SW 132 AVE 12 OSAGE TRL MIAMI,FL 33175-1121 MIAMI,FL 33175-1121 NAPLES,FL 34113-7971 H VERN AASEBY REV LIV TRUST HAERING,AUBREY L HAGERMAN,G KENNETH=&UNA R KYME S AASEBY REV LIV TRUST JOSHUA L HEARING KENNETH EDWARD HAGERMAN 18 NAVAJO TRL 240 PORTER ST PETER JOHN HAGERMAN NAPLES,FL 34113--7939 NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 31 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7976 Etiquettes faciles a peter 1 A Repliez a la hachure afin de 1 www.averycom 1 I 141.:1:........1.-.......1........:. wtirMAO romera 1 Sens de ,....w1...1.....11.....1 oe..`1l.dM I 1.. nn_rf_AVFRV 1 :Easy Peel®Labels i • M Bend along line to n A�/ERY® 5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® i Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edgeni j 1� j HAMILTON,ANNA F HANDEL,RICHARD HAROLD R DEVRIES JR TRUST • �4ES W HAMILTON II 59 CROMWELL RD 3 SPANISH TRAIL . HAMILTON RD WIMBLEDON NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 �HRANVILLE,PA 19330---1810 UK, SW 19 8LF-0000 HARPER,ELLA MAE HARTE,EDWARD HARTMAN,ROBERT D 16 ABILENE TRL VALERIA P HARTE KATHLEEN M HARTMAN NAPLES,FL 34113-7970 26 NAVAJO TRL 1 CHEROKEE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7924 NAPLES,FL 34113--7953 HAYS,NAOMI CATHERINE HEAD,WILLIAM T HEATH JR,HERBERT B DONALD WAYNE KIESLER ROSE A HEAD TINA M HEATH 236 PORTER ST 107 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD 27 SILVER CIRCLE NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 NAPLES,FL 34113---7960 BARRE,VT 05641--0000 • HEATH JR,HERBERT B=&TINA HELL,KLARA HENAULT,GILLES 27 SILVER CIR ILONA VIOLA HEINMULLER 161 RUE RONDEAU BARRE,VT 05641--9046 580 12TH AVE S • STE EMELIE DE NAPLES,FL 34102---8007 L'ENERGIE,QC CANADA, 34113--0000 HENDERSON,SAMUEL C=&CAROL M HENDRICKS,WILLIAM E HENRIQUEZ,IRMA IVETTE 5167 ROMAINE SPRING DR TERRY L HENDRICKS 5470 16TH PL SW APT 106 .E NTON,MO 63026-0000 9 PECOS TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34116-4963 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 HENSLEY,BONNIEM HERNANDEZ,EVARISTO HITCHING POST RICHARD 0 ESKRIDGE NELDA HERNANDEZ 32 CHEYENNE TRL 2 PECOS TRL 18 CHISHOLM TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7966 NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 HITCHING POST CO-OP HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN ATTN RICHARD ESKRIDGE 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN - 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL I-. NAPLES,FL i 3411'3-4935:: - - . ' / I NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 =• NAPLES,FL 34113=7235 ,0 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL • 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 •Etiauettes fades A Deter 1 A - Reoliez a la hachure afin de I www avery com 'Easy Peel®Labels i • MIMI Bend along line to AVERY®5166® 1 Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper , m01••• expose Pop-Up EdgeT/a j • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 P°. HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 IN_ POST__HOMEOWNER, ASSN ITCUinir_POST HnMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN Hi ll..�i��1V�'UJi ,:::IVICUVe1vCRJ nJuty ,.........� 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL • NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 �\ HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN - HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL i. NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 - - • I NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 • i NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 Etiquettes fades a peler 1 Replies la hachure afin de www averycom I Sens de _ a. 4 ®..f It!" AI fE1111.1 I =Easy Peel®Labels i • MIMI Bend along line to AVERY® 5460® i Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper �•1 expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j lam' 1 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN ,HEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL LES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 62 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL �PLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL:34113-7935 : • NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 • E4:a...n#ae FnrHae 3 nalar I A Ranlie2 A la hachure afin de 1 www.avery.com 1 =Easy Peel®labels i • MM. Bend along line to AVERY®5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up EdgeT'" j 1 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 /—", HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 :-::TCH1NG POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING;POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN • 32 CHEYENNETRL 32 CHEYENNETRL 32 CHEYENNETRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN . 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HOCKSTRA,JOHN R=&TRACI L 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 3340 PINEY RIDGE RD NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 LUDINGTON,MI 49431-0000 HOEFT,RAY=&MYRNA HOPKINS,EDWARD W HORNER TR,RODNEY E 7409 CIRCLE TRL MARILYN R HOPKINS VERNA J HORNER TR WONDER LAKE,IL 60097-8458 • 37:NMrAJO TRL RODNEY&VERNA HORNER RE TRUST NAPLES,FL 34113--7976 UTD 10/18/011196 YORKSHIRE DR MARION,OH 43302-6862 • HORNYAK,JOHN=&SUSAN HOSKINS,NANCY A HOUGHTLING TR,ELLSWORTH CLARE 1919 MANCHESTER CIR DALE L HOSKINS MARGARET ANN HOUGHTLING TR NAPLES,FL 34109--7221 3325 WEBER DR UTD 10/27/04 NORTON,OH 44203-5756 17 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7976 HOULAHAN,EDWARD J=&T MARIE HUBBARD,JON K=&EVA G HUNT,JERRY D 1271 WEBSTER DRIVE 6604 NW MELODY LN E CHERYL HUNT SARNIA,ON PARKVILLE,MO 64152-2757 8 OREGON TRL CANADA, N7S 2J9-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-7972 Etiquettes fadles peter ; • Repliez A la hachure afin del www averycom A. Sens de -- -- -- -Easy Peel®Labels 1 ♦ MIMI Bend along line to 1 AVERY® 5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® i Feed Paper „• expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1 HUNYADY,ELMER J IACONELLI CO-TRS,ROBIN L IACONELLI TR,ROBIN • � N M HUNYADY IACONELLI CO-TRS,PETER PETER IACONELLI TR -IEROKEE TRL ROBIN L IACONELLI REV/TRUST - ROBIN L IACONELLI REV TRUST PLES,FL 34113-7953 UTD 2/26/98117 3RD ST UTD 2/26/98188 PRICE ST . NAPLES,FL 34113--8551 NAPLES,FL 34113--8435 IONE,JOYCE JACOBSEN,GARY LEE JARDINE,LLOYD E=&JOYCE A RALPH WOODSON BROWN DENISE DIANE JACOBSEN 18 SPANISH TRL 27 ABILENE TRL 3541 HIGHLAND BLVD NAPLES,FL 34113-7948 NAPLES,FL 34113--7945 HIGHLAND,MI 48356-1827 JCS REALTY GROUP LLC JOHNSON,HELEN JOHNSON,HELEN KELLEY 2614 TAMIAMI TRL N 9 OSAGE TRL 9 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34103-4409 NAPLES,FL 34113-7938 NAPLES,FL 34113---7938 JOHNSTONE,MARIE E=&ROSS H JUDD TR,GILES G JUNG,MICHEL 17 E LAKE BERNARD DR LONESOME DOVE TRUST CAROLE TURCOTTE SUNDRIDGE,ON UTD 01/03/97 16625 RUE DE LA MOUSSON CANADA, POA 1Z0-0000 9 NAVAJO TRL MARIBEL,QC NAPLES,FL 34113--7976 CANADA, J7J 2P1-0000 JUSTE,JACQUES BRICE KASABOSKI,DAN KAVERMAN,MICHELLE C CAROSE T JUSTE • BETTY KASABOSKI 236 BENSON ST. 29 BENSON ST 1808 KINGSDALE AVE NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 PLES,FL 34113-8541 OTTAWA,ON CANADA, KIT 148-0000 KELLY,JAMES T=&MARQUERITE KELLY,ROSEMARY A KING,CHESTER J=&GENEVIEVE N 9 MULESHOE TRAIL 22 PECOS TRL 12 SPANISH TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-7966 NAPLES,FL 34113-7948 KIVETT,SANDRA D KLEIN,FRANCIS JOSEPH KOLLMEIERTR,KENNETH X 232 BENSON ST INEZ M KLEIN 4829 GARY RD . NAPLES,FL 34113--8540 15 BUTTERFIELD TRL BONITA SPRINGS,FL 34134-3928 NAPLES,FL 34113-7901 KOWALEWSKI,STANLEY F KRACKER TR,HELEN L KUMITZ,MARSHAJ ANTOINETTE KOWALEWSKI HELEN L KRACKER REV TRUST 11 CIMMARON TRAIL 314 PLUM RUN RD i UTD.5/6105 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 CANONSBURG,PA 15317-9727 7 SPANISH TRL _ NAPLES;FL 34113-7980 KUTIL,ALICE J LABONTE,NOEL LABRA,ANTOLIN 3652 STOER RD 12 NATCHEZ TRL RANGEL ARACELI SHAKER HEIGHTS,OH 44122---5116 NAPLES,FL 34113-7982 338 PORTER ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 LACOUNT,RITA LAKE,D ELIZABETH LAMBORELLE,RAYMOND 4 CHEYENNE TRL 112 2ND ST 14 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 NAPLES,FL 34113--8534 • NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 el-inflect-Foe farilne 1 nnlar I A Manila'A la harhnra afin de! Www.avery com i =Easy Peel®Labels i • Bend along line to AVERY® 5960® 1 Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper e� expose Pop-Up Edge"' j C\ LAMOTHE,ANDRE' LANGE,STEPHEN LANGMAID,JUDITH W DANIELLE SCOTT SANDRA L LANGE DONALD A LANGMAID 5980 DESLANDES ST 7 OSAGE TRL 16 CHEROKEE TRL �"•- HYACINTHE,QC NAPLES,FL 34113-7938 NAPLES,FL 34113-7967 , CANADA, J2R 1C2-0000 . LAVERDURE,ANDRE LAVOIE ET AL,ERIC LAZZARI,MARGARETM ANITA LEGAULT LAVERDURE 30 NAVAJO TRAIL 1207 MARTINIQUE CT MICHEL FEENEY NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 MARCO ISLAND,FL 34145--2321 7 SANTA FE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113R0--0000 LECHLIDER III,THOMAS L LEESON,WILLIAM R LENTZ,A ALLEN 16 APACHE TRL PHYLLIS E LEESON 168 BIG PIECE RD NAPLES,FL 34113-7965 6756 W BEAVER RD FAIRFIELD,NJ 07004-1210 GRAYLING,MI 49738-8587 Law5,FEf;RLEY G 1 GCKNFR TR.GEORGE P LOGSDON,OLLIE DALE T LEWIS MARLENE E LOCKNER TR TIM D=&APRIL Bi iMEK SUSANNE C ELSASS 8876 E MAIN ST 9 ABILENE TRL' CYNTHIA G FUHRMAN9 NATCHEZ TRL GALESBURG,MI 49053--9746 NAPLES,FL 34113--7945 NAPLES,FL 34113-7969 • LONG,MARTHA LONGTIN,IRENE D LORA,EDEL=&YARA TREJO ' 102 3RD ST AMANDA R CHARPENTIER 351 BENSON ST • NAPLES,FL 34113--8535 TINA M WILSON NAPLES,FL 34113-8556 9 QUEENSWAY ,0—..,QUEENSBURY,NY 12804-1601 RA,JOSE A LOREDO,FLAVIO LOVETT,VERNON BRUCE CI RINATREJO 306 PORTER ST LOIS ARLENE LOVETT 350 NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 3 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 NAPLES,FL 34113-7986 NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 LUCAS,SANDRA LUDERS,FORTIL LUNDBERG,MARK 155 SOUTHWEST BLVD CONSULTA LUDERS CAROLYN LUNDBERG 1ST ST 19 ROSE ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8558 117 NAPLES,FL 34113--8533 BROOKVILLE,PA 15825-2503 MAC INTYRE,GORDON MACALISTER,STEPHEN W MACCHIA,DONICK J JUDI MAC INTYRE JENNIFER MACALISTER JOANN MACCHIA RANDALL ST 252 BENSON ST '• 27 OREGON TRAIL SUMMERLAND, NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 , NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 CANADA, VOH 129-0000 MACINTYRE,GORDON=&JUDI MADERS,DONALD WTR M JUSTINA WILLIAMS JOSEPH DONALD W MADERS TRUST JUSTINA ILLA 2307 RANDALL ST 132 4TH ST SUMMERLAND,BC UTD 9/21/04 NAPLES,FL 34113-8536 CANADA, VOH 1Z0-0000 6 SANTA FE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7979 MALANDE,JEAN MALDONADO,JOSE L MALERBA,LOUIS M=&THERESA M 101 2ND ST LOUIS M MALERBA JR LUCIENNE E DIEUDONNE 220 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8550 19 PECOS TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 ttiquettes faciles a peter_ _ I • ce�an Repliez la hachure afin de w ww avery com ® 1 ♦ !s Bend aloe line to I ® ® i Easy Peel Labels g © AVERY 5160 1 Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper s� expose Pop Up EdgeY"' 1 MARPLE,NATHAN , JIA a•FIELD EST,DONNA J MARC,PASCAL=&MAGALIE 10 CHEYENNE TRAIL 288 BENSON ST 10 CHEYENNE N TRAIL -0000 3 E CLARK NAPLES,FL 34113--8540 3 E H CLARK 17. -.;OS TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7952 MARTIN,DENNIS MARTINEZ,JOSE DE JESUS 8 BUTTER, E JOAN MARJORIE G MARTIN MARTINEZ,ANA MARIA 8 BUTTERFIELD TRL RL 5539 SHOLTLT Z ST 20 FURLONG COURT NAPLES, 34113--8766 41 1 3--876 6 NAPLES,FL 34113-7968 TORONTO,ON CANADA, M1J 1Y8-0000 MC CORKLE,JOHN J MARTINEZ,VERONICA MAUK,CHRISTINE JOY=&BUELL MC CORKLE,JOHN HT 281 BENSON ST 625 NEPON ET MA T2062-5201 2 237 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 237 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 MCCUTCHEON,GORDON R MCGEE REVOCABLE TRUST JUNE LEMC,JOHN G 350 BENSON ST 20 ARAPAHO TRAIL 7 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8505 UNE MC LEOD NAPLES,FL 34113---7977 NAPLES,FL 34113-7976 MCKEEFRY,JIMMY L MCKEEFRY,JIMMY L=&LORI A 14 PECOS 6234 QUARRY DR MELFORD D=&ELLEN E 14 PEC TRL LORI A MCKEEFRY PULASKI,WI 54162-0000 D++QI_ES,FL 34113-7966 6234 QUARRY DR PULASKI,WI 54162-0000 MICHAUD,YANICK MICHELSEN,WILLIAM MEEK,WOODLAND F SANDRA 276 BENSON ST PAUL W MICHELSEN 135 WOODLAND FRST 103 OREGON TRAIL WINFIELD,WV 25213--9606 NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 103 OREGON O TRAIL MILSTED SR EST,ALVIN L MILLER TR,EARL P MILLER,ERNEST P=&DARLA A EUCLID AVE E SONIA A MILLER TR JEFFREY W MILLER PITMAN,NJ 08071--2422 21 CHEROKEE TRAIL UTD 5117!96 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 7807 RIVER DR SPRING GROVE,IL 60081-9303 • • MORIN TR,ISABELLE FAY MOORE,VICTORIA L MORIN REVOCABLE TRUST MOORE,ORE,ANN , 4 OSAGE TRL 19 OREGON TRL - - UTD 03/13/08• I , NAPLES,FL 34113-7971 1 • 15 CHEROKEE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7988 NAPLES,FL 34113--7926 MORRONE,ANTHONY J MULLINS,ERNEST C=&TERRY L MORIN, ND E WS ANDREWS JOAN M MC GEE 13 CHEROKEE TRL 1266 DIANE ANDREWS BOUCHARD 15 PECOS TRAIL LOT 328 NAPLES,FL 34113-7926 L'AN RUE E-VIS ET NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 L'ANCIENNE-LORET,QC �ANADA, 62E 1V9---0000 MURCH,KEITH D MURCH,GLENN MURCH,KEITH A MURCH MUNGER,JOANNE S JANET MURCH 2 OREGON TEL 799 RIVERSIDE DR 17 NATCHEZ TRAIL CAMBRIDGE,ON • NAPLES,FL 34113-7972 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 CANADA, N3H 2V1--0000 e.:....,«..�s .:rnt 3..®ror ! - • Reoliez a la hachure afin de I www:avery com 1 :asy Peel®Labels i • MM. Bend along line to Ate ®5160® lse Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edges j 1 NEWELL,FRANK DENNIS NICHOLS,JAMES C NINO JR,MIGUEL , DETER T NEWELL NELDA G NICHOLS ARLETH LABRA 301 BENSON ST 11 NAVAJO TRAIL 228 BENSON ST MAPLES,FL 34113-8556 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 ODON,OTIS L OLIVER,MICHAEL ORLOFSKY,FRANK 11 SANTA FE TRL 336 BENSON ST JOSEPHINE WOMELSDORF NAPLES,FL 34113-8505 33 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7919 NAPLES,FL 34113--7976 ORLOFSKY,FRANK ORLOFSKY,FRANK PAPINEAU,RUTH V JOSEPHINE WOMELSDORF JOSEPHINE WOMELSDORF 2170 10TH AVE NE 4 OREGON TRAIL 33 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34120--4967 NAPLES,FL 34113--7972 NAPLES,FL 34113-7976 --7S DE PHIS PARROT,KENNETH J PATRICK,LORETTA A ESTHER TREMBLAY 335 BENSON ST 747'WiLL:A'r"C T REET 28 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8556 MENTOR,OH 44060---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113--7940 PAUL,MARIE L PEEVER,J CARL=&ELLEN PELLETIER,GILLES 216 BENSON ST BRYAN J PEEVER DIONNE HUGUETTE NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 5 NAVAJO TRL 210 PORTER ST NAPLES,FL 34113---7990 NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 PEREZ,ANTONIO PERSHING,E LEE PETKOV,BORISLAV H . JUANA PONCE 1207 MARTINIQUE CT TEODORA P KYUMURDZHIEVA 149 4TH ST MARCO ISLAND,FL 34145--2321 277 BENSON ST TRAILERACRES NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 NAPLES,FL 34113-8552 PICHE,JACQUES PICK,DENNIS • PITTMAN,INA POWELL LYNE MORIN 21899 S 600 W DONALD J HENDRICK 111 MARCEL=&MARIE JEANNE PICHE LA CROSSE,IN 46348-9760 43 CIMMARON TRL 31 ABILENETRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7933 NAPLES,FL 34113R1--0000 PIUZE,LAURETTE DESCHENES PIUZE,LAURETTE DESCHENES PLEAU ET AL,DANIEL MICHELE PIUZE MICHELE PIUZE 7 CHEYENNE TRL JEAN TREMBLAY ' 14 ABILENE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113---7943 1292 JULIEN GREENQUEBEC,QC NAPLES,FL 34113-7970 CANADA, GIW 3M3-0000 PLEAU ET AL,DANIEL PLEAU,DANIEL PONCE,CRISTINA P 12 CHEYENNE TRL MICHELYNE PLEAU 123 1ST STREET NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 9 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113---7943 POOLE,KAREN POWERS,DENNIS A POYNTER,ROBERT 3518 WILLYS PKWY MAUREEN ANN POWERS 4680 PARKSTONE LN TOLEDO,OH 43612-1013 14 NATCHEZ TRAIL AVON,IN 46123---7095 NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 Etiquettes faciles a paler 1 Repliez a la hachure afro de 1 vuwvv averycom i I la:1:........1_.._L_..:a. wv,n1dkl rw rnUtl Sens de �-_.�. . � �.. .. T.. 1 w nnn s�r� svrw 1 Easy Peel®Labels 1 • MM. Bend along line to AVERY 5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j 1 POZAN,EDWARD G=&JUDITH A PREVATT,DAVID L=&ANNALEAH B QUINN III,JAMES ' 'RAPAHO TRAIL 260 PORTER ST PO BOX 325 '_ES,FL 34113--7964 NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 CLARKDALE,AZ 86324-0325 RAMBO,HENRY L RAMOS,ELVIA REFERENCE ONLY WANDA F RAMBO BENIGNO SAUCEDA HITCHING POST MOBILE HOME 41 CHEROKEE TRL 256 PORTER ST CO-OP NAPLES,FL 34113-792B NAPLES,FL 34113---8542 , —0000 REGAN,JOSEPH M REINHARD,MICHAELT REMY,KEITH D=&KATHLEEN MYRA STAMMEL 138 3RD ST 544 RISING HILL DR 10 ARAPAHO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8535 FAIRBORN,OH 45324---5917 NAPLES,FL 34113-7977 RICHARD,LYN RIVES,OMAIDA RIX,GALENA M SYLVAIN BRUNEAU CARMEN RIVES 287 BENSON ST 281 ST-LUC#1 18 SANTA FE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 QUEBEC,QC NAPLES,FL 34113--7979 CANADA, GIN 2S4-0000 ROBBINS,JOHN R ROBERTSTAD,KARK E RODRIGUEZ,IRIS DANIEL J ROBBINS BETTY ROBERTSTAD 343 BENSON ST ,_.2,CHEROKEE TRL 29 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8556 °LES,FL 34113-7916 NAPLES,FL 34113-7943 RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA,MARTHA M ROLF,ESTHER T ROWLEY,KELLY J=&BRENDA J 134 2ND ST MICHAEL WALSH 264 PORTER ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8534 15 NATCHEZTRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 NAPLES,FL 34113-7969 RUSSELL,JOHN=&LORRAINE RUTH A WINKER REVOCABLE TRUST RUTH A WINKLER REV LIV TRUST 200 BENSON ST UTD 08/04/08 6 BUTTERFIELD TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 8083 PALOMINO DR NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-2684 S&L SOHLMAN FAMILY REV TRUST SALVATORE,CHRISTINE SAMSON,JEAN GUY 3 NATCHEZ TRAIL • MELISSA INSKIP JEANNINE MARCOTTE YVES SAMSON NAPLES,FL.34113--0000 I • TERESA SALVATORE 25 CIMMARON TRAIL 546 CAVERLY DR NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 BRIGANTINE,NJ 08203-2820 SANDERS,GARY=&SANDRA SCHLAGETER,STANLEY B SCHLAGETER,STANLEY B MELISSA SANDERS 39 NAVAJO TRAIL 8417 OLD BOUNDARY RD MARK SANDERS NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 LOUISVILLE,KY 40291-0000 152 DES BOULEAUXLES COTEAUX,QC ,,ANADA, J7X 1A2-0000 SCHUH,ALLAN J SCHULZ ET AL,SANDRA L SCOTT EST,THEODORE PATRICIA A SCHUH 4252 SHOREWOOD DR 4 CHISHOLM TRL 18 APACHE TRL ROCKFORD,IL 61101-9369 NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 NAPLES,FL 34113-7965 • etir...ettne fnrllne h nnlar 1 A Ranli22 i3 la hachure afin del {RIW1N.avery com 1 -Easy Peel®Labels i • MOM Bend along line to A\/E ® §160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeT"' j 5160® j SCOTT,LOUISE HELEN SEYMOUR JR,HOMER SHIFLET,RONALD E=&SANDRA L 268 BENSON ST RONALD SEYMOUR 8019 WATTERSON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 33 CIMMARON TRL LOUISVILLE,KY 40291--1760 i" NAPLES,FL 34113---7933 • SLOSS,ELIZABETH D SLOSS • SMEATHERS,DONALD A r SMITH,DONALD CONNIE L RAMSEY PATRICIA K SMEATHERS 4 ABILENE TRL 105 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD 113 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD NAPLES,FL 34113-7970 • NAPLES,FL 34113-7960 NAPLES,FL 34113--7960 SMITH,DONALD JAMES SMITH,DONALD JAMES SOHLMAN JR TR,EVERT F MARJORIE LOUISE SMITH MARJORIE LOUISE SMITH CLAIRE JO SOHLMAN TR 14 ARAPAHO TRAIL 21 ABILENE TRL E&C JO SOHLAMN LIV TRUST NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 NAPLES,FL 34113---7945 UTD 12/13/949 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7986 _- r v'• SUMMERS.RONALD E=&JUDY K SOUTHWEST BLVD HOLDINGS LLC WILLIAM H SOLOMAN 1 OSAGE TRL 19275 W CAPiTOL DR STE 100 24 CHEROKEE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7938 BROOKFIELD,WI 53045-2744 NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 SOUTHWEST BLVD HOLDINGS LLC SOUTHWEST BLVD HOLDINGS LLC SPRAKER,JOHN=&KIMBERLY MARIE 19275 W CAPITOL DR STE 100 19275 W CAPITOL DR STE 100 30 CHEYENNE TRL BROOKFIELD,WI 53045-2744 BROOKFIELD,WI 53045--2744 NAPLES,FL 34113-7923 ST GERMAIN,ROBERT G STEPHENSON,ANN E STETLER,JOHN MARYLOU ST GERMAIN 1 TWINKLING CT 11 MULESHOE TRL 14 APACHE TRL BLUFFTON,SC 29909-6203 NAPLES,FL 34113-7947 NAPLES,FL 34113-7965 STEWART,BILLY E STINFIL,MARIE STONE ET AL,KENNETH P DIXIE L STEWART 314 PORTER ST BOX 438 SHERRY L BELL NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 COOPER CLIFF,ON 9 CHEROKEE TRL CANADA, POM 1NO-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113--7926 STOYANOVA,HRISTINA STRINGER,GRACE V STUCKEY,CAROL J . ZDRAVKO STOYANOV 32 ABILENE TRL 145 2ND ST 233 BENSON ST 233(eeh ` t - ,. I NAPLES,FL 34113-7900 . N.T'_-_SS-,FL 34,113--8550 NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 • - Na,o(/rc 3t//3 SULLIVAN,PATRICIA J SULLIVAN,RICHARD J SUTPHIN,EDWARD B 126 3RD ST 9 SANTA FE TRL NANCY A SUTPHIN NAPLES,FL 34113--8535 NAPLES,FL 34113--7919 56 SUNNY ACRES SETH,WV 25181-9564 SWAN,MAX 0 TATE,MICHAEL J TATTOLI,PAULA RUTH A SWAN NICOLE N TATE LINDA L SILVA 825 N HINTZ RD • 1 SPANISH TRAIL DIANE M LOESNER OWOSSO,MI 48867-8406 NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 TIMOTHY A FLETCHER1 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7943 Etiquettes faciles a peter 1 '♦ Repliez h la hachure afro del www.averycom 1' - -.-- . Sens de .. .. ..._�.. • ann r_" wvrnv 1 Easy Peel®Labels i • Send along line to Q AVERY® 5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper o•• expose Pop-Up EdgeT,' 1 TAYLOR,DONALD M TECRONEY,PAUL D=&SHEILA R TELFORT,ENISE ""ANNE A TAYLOR 286 PORTER ST 291 BENSON ST '4 EASTGATE VILLAGE DR NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 iSVILLE,KY 40223--4786 THOMPSON,JAMES L=&MEREDITH A TIMBURY,PATRICIA S F TODHUNTER,DESNEIGES M 33 ABILENE TRL DAVID S FLAD CHARLES C TODHUNTER NAPLES,FL 34113-7904 ROBERTA F VIGNEAULT 2003 OVERBROOK CRES LAURA F NELSONPO BOX 28 SUDBURY,ON WOODSTOCK,NH 03293---0028 CANADA, P3A 5J5-0000 TREJO LORA,CARLA M TREMBLAY,MAURICE TRUHLSEN,WILLIAM C 220 PORTER ST GAETANE GAGNE JOAN R TRUHLSEN GUERARD 28 ABILENE TRL 1295 NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 ALMA,QC NAPLES,FL 34113--7970 CANADA, G8B 61(7-0000 TURCOTTE,GILLES TUTTLE SR,JAMES L=&VONCILE TUYA,FRANK LOUISE HEBERT 1291 ROGANA RD 133 2ND ST 1860 RUE DAUMIER BETHPAGE,TN 37022--8611 NAPLES,FL 34113--8550 JONQUIERE,QC CANADA, G7Z 1P9-0000 TVETEN,CHRISTIAN UMPENHOUR,KRISTOPHER E VELLEFF,ELIZABETH B 290 PORTER ST SHEILA UMPENHOUR 4451 GARDNER DR NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 112 4TH ST PORT CHARLOTTE,FL 33952-9728 NAPLES,FL 34113-8536 VELOSO,HECTOR VERMETTE,MIREILLE VEZINA,MICHEL ZOA ELIDA PALLAIS ROMAIN CARON LISE COTE 16 ARAPAHO TRL ROBERT BOIVIN MARC VEZINA NAPLES,FL 34113-7977 ERIC CARON2 APACHE TRL 13 ABILENE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7965 NAPLES,FL 34113-7945 VILLASENOR,MANUEL=&ISABEL VILLASENOR,MANUEL=&ISABEL VISICALE,JOSEPHINE 251 BENSON ST 251 BENSON ST 20 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 NAPLES,FL 34113-7940 VOULIGNY,GEORGE WAGNER,MELANIE A WALKER,ROBERT R=&NANCY A. HUGUETTE LEMOINEc n6+' 24 NAVAJO TRL 4699 NW COUNTY ROAD 141 �0��`" ! •"!f NAPLES,FL 34113-7939 ` JEKiNI.K S,F'-32053-3130 1'11�8Fi2EFOE`.sNMSRD /�l �uK NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 . �e-NI i ajs,. 32053-3/30 WALSH,KATHLEEN L WARNE,WM E WELLS,BRIAN TAMMY A BURNS DOROTHY M WARNS 316 BENSON ST 18 CHEYENNE TRL MARJORIE LTUNNEY NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113--7922 29 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7976 WELSH,NEIL C WELSH,NEIL C WESLEY,SCOTT J SONJA L WELSH SONJA L WELSH 15155 BOICHOT RD 29 OREGON TRL 22 CHEROKEE TRAIL LANSING,MI 48906--1005 NAPLES,FL 34113--7905 NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 tticiuettes faciles a paler ; A • la hachure afro de I vvvuw.avery com ® ' A s Bend along line to 1 ® ® ' Easy Peel Labels 1 9 1 AVERY 5160 Use Avery®Template 5160® A Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up Edger" i j WILSON,PAMELA E WISEMAN,CARL M=&SHIRLEY A WISEMAN,VICKI LYNN 259 BENSON ST 2 SPANISH TRL 4194 MINERS CANDLE PL NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 NAPLES,FL 34113--7994 CASTLE ROCK,CO 80109--0000 WOLFENSON,LOUIS B WOLFENSON,LOUIS B WOODLEY,FRANKLIN 16 OREGON TRL 8 PECOS TRL DONNA WOODLEY NAPLES,FL 34113--7966 8 CHEROKEE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113---7972 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 WOODLEY,FRANKLIN WOODWORTH,RICHARD L YENTES,VIVIAN DONNA WOODLEY KATHRYN J WOODWORTH REBECCA GOLEMBISKI 10 MULESHOE TRL 7873 S SUGAR ISLAND RD 22 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7978 CHEBANSE,IL 60922-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113---7971 7=1\17 THOMAS J=&SUSAN L ZENZ,THOMAS J=&SUSAN LYNN ZENZ.THOMAS.1 285 PRICE ST 285PRICESi susAN!_Z=np NAPLES,FL 34113-8438 NAPLES,FL 34113-8438 285 PRICE ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8438 • ZICK,VERL DALE East Naples Civic Association SANDRA M ZICK Whistler's Cove Apartments 3823 Tamiami Trail East,PMB#274 12 BUTTERFIELD TRIAL 11400 Whistler's Cove Blvd. Naples,FL 34112 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 Naples,FL 34113 • Etiquettes faciles a peter 1 Repliez a to hachure afin de 1 www averycom I__ 1...:+evcw®GI t ,Sens de-6 reveler le rebord Pop-UpT*I ; 1-800-GO-AVERY NIM Summary Vincentian GMPA—MPUD (GMPA-PL-2013 0001767/CP-2013-10) (PUDZ-PL-20130001726) July 17, 2014 South County Regional Library Note: This is a summary of the NIM. A verbatim recorded is also provided. The verbatim record denotes all questions raised by attendees and responses to those questions. Attendees: On behalf of Applicant: Robert Mulhere,Rich Yovanovich, Christopher Shucart County Staff: Kay Deselem, Corby Schmitt Approximately 18 members of the public attended. At 5:35 PM, Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the other consultants, the applicant, and County staff. Mr. Mulhere explained the NIM process, provided an overview of project, including what is being requested and the existing PUD permitted uses. Mr. Mulhere also went over the proposed PUD master plan, include location for development, stormwater lake, preserve, and project access. Mr. Mulhere also explained the process for review and approval of the GMPA and the PUD Amendment. The members of the public who identified themselves were either from the adjacent Hitching Post RV Park or from Trail Acres, an adjacent platted single family development. There were numerous questions related to site design and uses. The most significant issue of concern was related to affordable housing. There was significant opposition expressed to any additional affordable or subsidized housing in this area. Mr. Mulhere indicated that the applicant had no intention of building affordable housing and was willing to put a condition or limitation in the PUD that would restrict the housing to market rate. The meeting concluded at 6:30 PM. Page 1 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\NIM Summary 7-23-2014 rev.docx ..- '-',S' j 1 t -,.., \ %,c-‘i -cs N RI � U) .� L "�aY U (n ^✓� CD EU "1 E c - 0 0 Q ti a) o o m :C , � fir,. c) 0 N - Vv au > O v L O o ' O a_ O . i , ,.. „i.:____ z . 6 13 v a) _ i� . . N T' 14. P4,1 1111 c-+ e ,__e = i — i v' - i ' -N . , i ii ,i �, {I 11 1 i Chi \ .4-_. - 4.I- ‘L L N w ! w * E s U a !f �1 1 .--'" \- -, . ,-A siP I.°44 W 6 L ..t.! p....1 >..4 CP : '6 > 2 2 ti (--S 1 '1 .,1.- 1 i 1 -- Q bA v, 1� ^J Z/ rl� /� Un , 4 , (� '� vi ! 3 O L g T i y 7 O v CO O N v a) U N \ 1 1,,i ,:__, , _ L \` h�l c h�I vi c o a ri „,)a ' _f___)k • .,___z z - 0 '0 11 -'-‘ I. 1- ,.. m ' \-"\ L'44.%-' ' ' ‘• ,,-, �� 1 S 'mil ,.._.) ,,_, t--L _ Ts 0 c � $ .0 w s� 0 (B L < ,f\ M C t 0 O O L O - ®_ 1--i O O � ea co p O +-• E O CA O. _a O IL• O C ry"9 V � � w c N 2 o 13 o C Z $ S aJ I\ ,...-, Cr) ,• T, N .O N O N L O O O a L, y, rtS wU)0 g (3, ® 1"4 c L O G O ✓ % T O "O y,, as U g. ii- ,o , h ^ O w * v Oa v La E.'2.1 N ' ' 0 w * 3 c U ZU LA._A .n 3 7 CD 7� ~� r^ U▪ i i 49 r1-3 ./7�▪ to v)® W a �� Q o YYYy Zt +�-, T TS `� p,/ �I O > . 3 `� MM F�1 iHi? 3 c ^() ./ , O= u Ls) 40 rW O v O • O y,L 3 d y 'u ( n W U S U O N Z Y L L / _ O O 3 O O O zU L a_ › N II""--11 0 U & Q - O > �) L� N t L cu N @ L ++ \'' l 'mot S ✓ / � LA = U J � � o .a as 4,P \. w OO � .cs z 1 +' CU y_ i- M E g ca C..)fie{ L V C S; �� o O � C C j / cn cu _c cii u u VINCENTIAN PUDA/GMPA NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Date and Time: July 17, 2014 at 5:30pm Location: Collier County South Regional Library,Meeting Room"A" 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway,Naples, Florida 34113 Existing Approved Uses: The site presently zoned PUD and allows for approximately 8 acres of commercial uses including hotel, retail office and personal services uses. The PUD also allows for residential development at 4 units per acre, and Adult Living Facilities (ALFs). Summary of Proposed Changes: GMPA: The applicant is requesting to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to create the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.681 acres, and is located on the south/west side of U.S. 41/Tamiami Trail East, as shown below. III CPUD� RSF-3 RMFB `r\ �� , �= ,�'j A� LELYRESC ZR°Tg P11111■111111111 s' i.i PUD �IIIIIII1IIIIIIIIL. " ,REE TOPS • a, COLLIER ZONING G ‘*,444 PUD © WHI9 P RDS COVE PROPERTY ', . 9, A ZONING � �- MB' i .4IS .iedr ��1 � — � 101110.4r TRAIL ACRES a it ,•� - •., ' ∎■ £ A# 44 EAGLE LAKES � , ,. II I . —SUBJECT PARCEL 4 9' COMMUNITY PARK . •, '•� , O ��• • O VINCENT AN �� ' P ZONING ., 1�.; �p •. � �i�� ` 1 : s t-A '. ',Tx-It-7:Z; ,INF 0 •SJTRAIL Ill ACRES;" MOBILE HOME PARK` �' 01 RSF� WENT oRTH ta11111111110 # Ik ler ESTATES MH PUD TTRVC HITCHING POSTT f(_____7 -r- 11111 '• TRAVEL TRAILER PAR MH /4 ♦♦♦ �� VICTORIA FALLS � • Page 1 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\Vincentian NBA Handout 7-17-2014.docx The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for a mixture of neighborhood or community commercial development; residential development; and other employment generating uses such as corporate headquarters. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and potentially allow for office uses that would provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In addition, the Subdistrict provides the alternative of residential or mixed use development. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The Subdistrict allows all those commercial uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, both by right and as conditional uses, with the exception of the following prohibited uses: 1. Pawn shops (5932), 2. Adult book stores, adult video rental or sales, or any other use that is defined as a "sexually oriented business"in the Collier County Code of Laws, 26-151 et seq., 3. Animal specialty services except veterinary(0752); except outside kenneling and dog grooming are permitted, 4. Automatic merchandising machine operators (5962), 5. Correctional institutions (9223), 6. Crematories (7261), 7. Farm product raw materials (5153-5159), 8. Fishing, commercial(0912-0919), 9. Fuel dealers (5983-5989), 10. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens, 11. Installation or erection of building equipment contractors (1796), 12. Local and suburban passenger transportation(4131-4173), 13. Marinas (4493 &4499) , 14. Motor vehicle dealers,used only(5521), 15. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified (7299), Coin operated service machine operations, Comfort station operation, Escort service, Locker rental, Massage parlors (except those employing licensed therapists), Rest room operation, Tattoo parlors, Turkish baths, Wedding chapels,privately operated, 16. Power laundries, family and commercial (7211), and 17. Transfer stations (4212). The Subdistrict includes the following additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses will be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet, a hotel (max. FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility(max. FAR 0.6). 2. Residential will be limited to a maximum density of 11.74 units/acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the project, inclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. 3. A single (one) automobile service station may be permitted anywhere within the Subdistrict. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association �-. with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility may be permitted. Page 2 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\Vincentian NIM Handout 7-17-2014.docx 4. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. PUDA: A PUD Amendment has been submitted as a companion to the GM? Amendment explained above. The PUD Amendment is necessary to establishes zoning on the property that allows the uses and includes the limitations contained in the in the Vincentian Subdistrict, including the following(see the PUD Master Plan attached: • A 4.5± acre preserve on site located so as to buffer the adjacent residential uses from the project development; • A 4± acre lake, also located so as to buffer the adjacent properties from the development; • All required landscape buffers; Page 3 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\Vincentian NBA Handout 7-17-2014.docx A�Iative Vegetation and Open Space \ .. \. Existing Native Vegetation'= 29.77 Ac. C°�.ZONING Min On-site Native Preservation Req'd \ GAS , "D" WHISTLER'S (Commercial) \ STATION 20. TYPE COVE- PUD 29.77x15%=4.46Ac. \ LANDSCAPE �1 Min On-site Native Preservation Req'd VACANT (Residential o'r Mixed-Use) `>` BUFFER 29.77x259'19=7.44Ac. Min Open Space Req'd.(Comm.or Mixed-Use) • `� /'• 30.68x30% =9.20 Ac' 7,4.1\•,.a i' I/ `. Min Open Space Required(Residential) . ' `� 30.68'x 60% =18.41 Ac ', 4 20' TYPE"D" \c \ 7 , ' LANDSCAPE �. (/14/ TRAIL ACRES \ ;'"K 1919•.s i� ' R,SF-4=ZONING ; t'¢Q��, BUFFER .`a ,Ar, ' .57 a 200 400 p \ , \? \ \ ■ TRACT MU 10 TYPE A � EXISTING 15'U.E. LANDSCAPE . E- ' '. MIXED USE BUFFER ;1 ° ¢ \ EXISTING 15'U.E.--.--1 Z¢ 0 [ =ELI m z. , 'J . ' i Z ��-1 ;`" - `>. 15' TYPE "B" 15'TYPE "B". = UO °2'`: �'. LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. BUFFER 0 ,& \ i_\ fn Z Denotes Location of,Requested ` 0 W 0 Deviations. Deviation' Will.OcctIr Throughout.the PUD: ;'' ,,"\' TRACT "P" TRACT 0 I PRESERVE — W n.LH = J vm tt '\ ,' � o Land Use Summary " .//' / ' EXISTING 15'U. LAKE z 2 a. Description Acreage Percent z. A• . Mixed-Use.(Tract MU) 22.05 71.9% ,.' '�. EXISTING 15'U.E. Lake(Tract L) 4.17 13:6% .! % Preserve(Tract P) 4.46 14.5% Ni TOTAL 30.68 100.0% %' ` ' A 1 .�_ 1 _��.r _ —7- - ,_._..- /" I TRAIL ACRES RSF=4 ZONING Maximum Dwelling Units:360. Commercial Uses:Maximum of 250;000 SF, And/or a hotel at 0.6 FAR,maximum of 150 rooms, And/or an ALF at 0.6 FAR 95Q Encore Way u RA1�P.M. 19 01/2014 VINCENTIAN MPUD B.BB� 1947E Naples,FL.341.10 MK 01/2014 Phone:(239)254=2000 MASTER PLAN °'E`R.VP . a 01/26.14 M. HOLE MONTES Florida Certificate of - wrncwc H t_ 0s0 c� N;iNEERSPANpSAINEYflRS Atithorization No.1772 EX H I B IT C --b6/16%201 d Page 4 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\Vincentian NIM Handout 7-17-2014.docx TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEH ING Naples , Florida July 17, 2014 The following Neighborhood Information Meeting was held at the collier county south i RPoiona1 Literary, 8065 Lely cultural Parkway_ Naples, Florida, commencing at 5: 30 p.m. Present: Christopher shucart, Developer — Bob Mulhere, Hole-Montes Key Deselem, Planner Corby Schmidt, county_ Rich Yovanovich, Esquire ALSO PRESENT: Approximately 25 attendees . 4,, (6j (r c'11‘), ,'. �Mq1 ( r)\0)r.1 d` �rli)it( 1 I i ) 49,,, ,/' TAKEN BY: CHERIE' R. NOTTINGHAM Certified Professional court Reporter Gregory Court Reporting, Inc. 2650 Airport Road south -- Naples , Florida 34112 (239)774-4414 2 1 MR. MULHERE: okay, can you hear me okay? 2 Good. 3 My name is Bob Mulhere. First of all , 4 thank you for coming. I know everybody has a 5 busy schedule and I'm glad you showed some 6 interest and that you' re able to attend. 7 My name is Bob Mulhere. I work for a 8 company called Hole Montes . It's a civil 9 engineering and planning company with offices 10 in Naples for, I don't know, since 1966. The 11 company's been here a long time. 12 My client is Chris shucart, and Chris owns 13 the property that we' re going to talk about. 14 And here comes Rich Yovanovich right now. 15 And Rich is our land use attorney on the 16 project. we'll introduce him. oh, Rich 17 Yovanovich, welcome, welcome. 18 Also here tonight from the county, Kay 19 Deselem, who is the planner reviewing the 20 project, zoning elements of the project. And 21 Corby is the comprehensive planning staff 22 member who will be reviewing one of the other 23 petitions we have, which is comprehensive 24 planning. Corby Schmidt. And then they can 25 answer questions that maybe I -- while I 3 1 probably would try to answer them, some 2 questions are better for the staff. so I' ll 3 defer to them as it comes up. 4 By way of very quick background, I worked 5 for the county for almost 15 years . 14 years . 6 I left the county in 2001, so I've been in the 7 private sector doing -- I've continued to do a 0 ..-c „,nrl, t-ho r ni wory 4n i-ormc of n12nni nn 9 consultation for other counties in Southwest 10 Florida, preparing land use plans , but I also 11 work for private sector clients too, and that' s 12 what I'm doing here tonight. 13 so these neighborhood information 14 meetings, I don't know if you've been to one 15 before, really, developers who are smart 16 wouldn't need a rule to require them to do 17 this, they would do it anyway. Because nobody 18 would really want to be surprised getting to a 19 public hearing and find out that there's a 20 roomful of people in opposition, when perhaps 21 simply having a meeting before the hearing 22 would allow the developer to explain what he' s 23 asking for, allow the neighbors to understand 24 what' s being asked for and allow the developer 25 to hear any concerns and then think about how 4 1 they might adjust and react to those concerns . 2 But a while back now, 20 -- maybe in 2000 3 whatever, the county, rewrote this requirement 4 for a neighborhood information meeting. So you 5 have to have this neighborhood information 6 meeting and you have to have it prior to the 7 public hearings starting. And you have to wait 8 until the staff has had a chance to review the 9 project a little bit. You can't have it real 10 early because things can change during the 11 review process. So kind of falls in after the 12 staff has done a substantive review but before 13 the public hearings occur. 14 we are asking for -- oh, by the way, this 15 is Cherie' . she's a court reporter. The 16 county has us record these. we used to just 17 record them on a tape recorder. The county's 18 gotten a little more particular about it, and I 19 can understand why. It's a little bit harder 20 for some staff member to have to listen to a 21 crackly old tape recorder and try to understand 22 what's going on. Then they say we' re not going 23 to listen to it anymore, you can listen to 24 them, but want a summary. And we said, hey, 25 this is kind of hard. So Cherie' will record 5 1 the meeting, I'll try to remember to speak 2 slowly and she'll tell me if I don't. And when 3 you ask a question, if you could just say your 4 name and spell it, unless it's smith. 5 we' re asking for two types of petitions. 6 The first is a GMP or a comprehensive plan 7 amendment. In Florida every city and county has a e-nmprehensive plan and it' s very sort of 9 high level . If you think about it, it's kind 10 of like the Constitution for the united states . 11 it sets policies and it says where certain 12 types of development should occur and where — 13 certain types of development should not occur, 14 where rural lands are, where agricultural lands 15 are. 16 This land is within the urban area, as you 17 can appreciate. You all know where it is, it' s 18 just off u.s. 41, East Naples. so the land is 19 designated urban. 20 It does not, though -- and it has zoning 21 on it right now. It' s zoned PUD. And that' s a 22 planned unit development. And a planned unit 23 development is sort of like a document that 24 sets zoning on a particular piece of land. You 25 could have straight zoning which in the Land 6 1 Development code provides a list of uses and 2 development standards, or you can develop your 3 own list of uses and your own standards and go 4 to the Board and get it approved through 5 zoning. 6 And that happened years ago. That's where 7 were the name vincentian comes from originally. 8 when this was approved it was owned by the 9 Diocese of Venice. And Venice, vincentian, 10 that's where the name comes from. There have 11 been several owners since that point in time, 12 at least two, but the name has been retained. 13 The PUD right now allows residential uses 14 and commercial uses. But it's got limitations . 15 obviously the commercial uses, right now the 16 PUD limits it to about eight acres. obviously 17 if you' re going to build commercial and you' re 18 limited to eight acres on an approximately 30 19 and a half acre site, you' re going to put that 20 along 41. 21 The residential use is limited to four 22 units an acre. And typically under this PUD 23 and typically the way it was years ago when 24 this got approved, you would calculate that 25 density on everything except the commercial . 7 1 So you wouldn't be able to count it as 2 commercial acres . 3 As my client has owned the land over a 4 period of time and looked for opportunities to 5 find either a partner, a joint venture or an 6 individual interested in the land to develop it 7 for either the commercial use or the R res-j C'henti al use, it hPCRMe clear that there 9 were issues with what was allowed in terms of 10 the marketplace. The commercial use sort of 11 drives a different -- kind of a strip pattern 12 of development. It doesn't allow for 13 flexibility of design, doesn't allow for a 14 larger commercial use if somebody was 15 interested in one, doesn't allow for something 16 unique in terms of a mixture of uses , 17 residential and commercial . And because of the 18 cost of the land and the small size, this 19 project does not lend itself and therefore 20 there's been no market for low density 21 development such as single-family. 22 Before -- on 20 acres -- I'll go to 23 questions in just a minute. 24 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Can you 25 repeat that? 8 1 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. I said because of the 2 relative small size and you' re talking about in 3 the neighborhood of 80 or 90 dwelling units, 4 this does not lend itself to a single-family 5 development. You don't have enough land to 6 amenitize (sic) it properly and sell it at a 7 market rate. Therefore there's been no buyers. 8 There's been a lot of lookers but no buyers at 9 that low density. 10 Frankly, if there's been any kind of 11 attraction for the property, it's been folks 12 that might want to look at a higher kind of a 13 density such as an affordable housing project 14 or an adult living facility, which wouldn't be 15 affordable but would enjoy a higher number of 16 units . 17 we don't propose to develop it under an 18 affordable housing scenario, getting a density 19 bonus for that. As you know, there's already a 20 pretty significant affordable housing 21 development across the street. 22 we would like to see this developed at 23 market rate and we' re willing to commit to that 24 as part of our proposal . 25 so what we' re asking for in the Growth 9 1 Management Plan is to allow for up to 360 2 dwelling units on the property and up to 3 250,000 square feet of retail commercial , or a 4 mixture of the two. 5 Now, I want you to understand that does 6 not mean that we would be able to do all that 7 commercial plus all that residential . Because Q ' ' hay In an arri di nn r-a-1. and what the rnl!nt-v 9 likes to use to limit development, they want -- 10 they understand the need for flexibility in the 11 marketplace. They want to give flexibility. 12 But the way that we' re able to -- that 13 they' re able to regulate the degree of 14 intensity, the amount that you can develop, and 15 their concern is traffic. so you do a traffic 16 study and then they limit you to no more than a 17 certain number of trips at peak hour. And I 18 don't know that exact number, but there is a 19 limit. And that limit, whatever mixture we 20 use, if we do some residential , some 21 commercial , all commercial , all residential , 22 however we do it, we can't exceed that trip 23 count, that certain number of trips. 24 In order to have these changes occur, we 25 first have to amend the comprehensive plan. 10 1 And that's a two-step process. The first step 2 is what' s called transmittal . we have a 3 hearing date for August 21st for the 4 comprehensive plan for transmittal of this -- 5 for the Planning Commission, before the collier 6 County Planning Commission, and then the Board 7 would be for October, z believe. 8 Transmittal is -- gives a chance for the 9 Planning Commission and the Board to take a 10 look at what we' re proposing, determine whether 11 they support it, determine if there's any 12 changes that they feel are necessary, and then 13 work with us at that hearing. And if they 14 approve it, they would then transmit it to the 15 State Department of Economic Opportunity. Used 16 to be the Department of Community Affairs, but 17 under the current Governor that all got changed 18 a few years ago and now it's Department of 19 Economic opportunity. So they' ll transmit it. 20 That's why it's called a transmittal . 21 The state will look at it. If they don 't 22 have any objections within 30 days, they don't 23 have to say -- as long as they don't have 24 objections , 30 days go by and we don't hear 25 anything from them, we'll know by the fact that 11 1 they haven't said anything that there are no 2 objections . 3 we can then work on making any changes 4 that the Board discusses during transmittal and 5 then getting final review of the zoning 6 document, which is the PUD, which will be a 7 companion to the Growth Management Plan 0 .. a :'lSlenume nt 9 2..; u thncr.€... will gn.,, tn..g<o.th ar re-..r the 9 adoption hearing. 10 And if we go to the Board in October for 11 transmittal , we' re probably talking in the 12 range of February for the adoption hearings, 13 which would also be the zoning. You can't 14 rezone the property inconsistent with the 15 comprehensive planning, so we have to go 16 through that process either simultaneous or 17 first. In this case it will be simultaneous . 18 In fact, they' ll actually approve or hear the 19 comp. plan on the same agenda, but they'll 20 approve it first and approve the zoning after. 21 Because you have to do it in that order. 22 I'm sure there's a number of things I 23 forgot. Let me just go over the handout rather 24 quickly so that -- you probably haven't had a 25 chance to digest it, and if you look at it and 12 1 have questions . 2 what I've given you is a summary of 3 what -- of the changes that we' re proposing. 4 And we are expressly listing 17 uses in our 5 Growth Management Plan Amendment that will be 6 prohibited uses. So I just want to be clear, 7 because people sometimes miss that word, that 8 this list of 17 uses here will be expressly 9 prohibited in our Growth Management Plan 10 Amendment. 11 And then the next paragraph has some 12 additional restrictions, and I talked to you 13 about those restrictions in terms of the 14 maximum square footage and so on, so forth. 15 so I'm sure you' re going to have some 16 questions tonight. And we'll try our best to 17 respond to those questions and listen to any 18 concerns that you may have. 19 I want to go over and just take a minute 20 to go over the Puy master plan with you. But I 21 also want to say that if you do have any 22 questions, you can either call me -- I left my 23 business cards in the car but I'll go get them 24 at the end of the meeting, I' ll bring them 25 back -- or you can call Kay at the county or 13 1 Corby Schmidt and we'll try to answer any 2 questions that you have. If you got a notice 3 of this, my number is in that too. 4 So this is an aerial . I'm sure some of 5 you had a chance to take a look at it. It 6 shows you where the property is right here. 7 Hitching Post and Trail Acres . R . This is the pun master plan. There's a 9 couple of z think important points z want to 10 make. 11 we've strategically located -- the county 12 requires that a developer preserve a certain -- 13 percent of vegetation on the site; 15 percent 14 is commercial , 25 percent is residential or 15 mixed use. we've located that to buffer us 16 from the residential development. The county 17 only requires a 15-foot landscape buffer 18 between these uses, but what we've done is 19 built that up by building our preserve in here. 20 And we've already had the discussions with 21 staff and they' re supportive of the location of 22 the preserve. And z think we've actually had a 23 preserve that's actually gotten jurisdictional 24 permits . 25 This is over a 100-foot width in this 14 1 location. so we' re going to have a much more 2 robust preserve than folks typically have for a 3 50-foot landscape buffer. we still have to 4 provide that landscape buffer, but in addition 5 we'll have the preserve. 6 And on this side next to the Hitching 7 Post, we've located -- there's some preserves 8 in here and then we've located our lake here, 9 so there's a lot of separation pushing these 10 uses closer to southwest Boulevard and Tamiami 11 Trail away from the residential . 12 one more thing, and I'll go right to 13 questions. 14 This right here is the Hitching Post 15 Plaza, so we have commercial right here. 16 okay, I think that's it. I'm open for 17 questions. 18 Yes, ma'am. 19 MS. KELLY: What was on the -- 20 THE COURT REPORTER: May I have your name, 21 please. 22 MR. MULHERE: Wait, what was your name, 23 please? 24 MS. KELLY: I'm sorry. Rosemary Kelly. 25 K-E-L-L-Y. 15 1 How many feet is that tract by the lake? 2 Because it's backing right up. 3 MR. MULHERE: This lake right here? 4 MS. KELLY: Yes. 5 MR. MULHERE: This is approximately -- 6 MS. KELLY: Not there. 7 MR. MULHERE: Hang on. I'm going to give en ' ?! F1PrcnprtiVP_ Thi c i c -- nnP inch Pn��a1 c - - - . 9 100 feet out here. So this is maybe 120 or 150 10 feet, 130 feet. So if you look at that, you' re 11 at least 200 foot. In this case, I don't know, 12 400 feet. 13 MR. SHUCART: Maybe not that the far. 14 MR. MULHERE: Well , one, two, three, 300 15 feet. 16 MS. KELLY: You' re misunderstanding the 17 question. 18 MR. MULHERE: Oh , I'm sorry. 19 MS. KELLY: The question is, I see the 20 Hitching Post. 21 MR. MULHERE: Yes . 22 MS. KELLY: How far from the Hitching Post 23 is the barrier to the lake? 24 MR. MULHERE: You mean where does the lake 25 start? 16 1 MS. KELLY: Thank you. 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, I'm sorry. 3 That's -- well , this is 15 . 4 MS. KELLY: Less than 25 feet -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, this is 15 right 6 there, so I'd say 25, 30 feet. 7 MS. KELLY: Do you realize that we' re in a 8 flood zone? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. That's actually going 10 to help. 11 MS. KELLY: Help you or help us? 12 MR. MULHERE: No, it's going to help you. 13 MS. KELLY: How's that going to happen? 14 MR. MULHERE: Presently there is no water 15 management on the site. There's no water. 16 MS. KELLY: I know -- 17 MR. MULHERE: So the South Florida Water 18 Management District permits the site, has 19 already permitted the site, requires us to 20 retain our water on the site. we can't let 21 that water go off our site and onto your 22 property. We have to design this to retain 23 that water at a minimum of a 25-year storm 24 event. Then you we' re allowed -- (inaudible) 25 just like you guys are -- who knows what 17 1 happened when you guys got done. But -- 2 MS. KELLY: But this is within the flood 3 zone currently. 4 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, everybody's in the 5 flood zone. 6 MS. KELLY: The middle of 41 -- 7 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about the R coastal hinh hazard area . 9 MS. KELLY: Right. 10 MR. MULHERE: But that has to do with 11 hurricane evacuation. It does not include 12 rainfall amounts and flood. That has to do 13 with hurricane evacuation. what we' re talking 14 about -- I thought you were talking about a 15 rain event causing water to rise. 16 So this will be designed. It will be 17 better. You will not have any flooding from 18 this property coming onto your property. None. 19 There's going to be a berm. There will be a 20 berm. You won't have any water. There's no -- 21 MS. KELLY: Did you walk that property? 22 MR. MULHERE: oh, yeah, I've been on the 23 property. 24 MS. KELLY: It' s pretty soggy. 25 MR. MULHERE: I know. That's -- trust me, 18 1 you are going to be -- 2 MS. KELLY: I trust you if you want to 3 move that lake over somewhere else. 4 MR. MULHERE: Well , it's already permitted 5 in that location. It's already permitted where 6 that jurisdiction is. South Florida water 7 Management and corps of Engineers had to review 8 this and they did. 9 Now, you can have -- it won't be square 10 like that. It will be -- 11 MS. KELLY: I'm not worried about that 12 side. 13 MR. MULHERE: No, I understand. 14 This lake there helps you. The water's 15 going to go into the lake, it' s not going to go 16 across the street. That actually helps you. 17 know it's maybe a little hard to -- 18 MS. KELLY: Yeah, it is, to comprehend. 19 MR. MULHERE: It's true. I don't have a 20 civil engineer here, but I'll put you in touch 21 with him, if you want to talk to him. 22 so any other questions? 23 Must be a couple other questions . 24 MR. WESTERBELT: Steve westerbelt. 25 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry? 19 1 MR. MULHERE: Westerbelt. 2 MR. WESTERBELT: westerbelt. 3 MR. MULHERE: W-E-S-T-E-R-B-E-L-D-T. 4 MR. WESTERBELT: No D. But the D is 5 common. 6 The entrances off the Southwest Boulevard, 7 the arrows there, there will be mostly like two 0 +bran r.r.o h., All • i c that tho i d(aa? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. Yes . 10 MR. WESTERBELT: Or not at that -- 11 MR. MULHERE: Yes, and the reason for that 12 is if -- if some of this is developed as -' 13 commercial and some of the back is developed as 14 residential , you'll want to have a separate 15 entrance for the commercial . You wouldn't want 16 people having to come all the way back for the 17 commercial and residential to have separate -- 18 MR. WESTERBELT: Okay. And then in the 19 area that' s commercial to commercial where the 20 Hitching Post Plaza is right there, will that 21 be walled off or is it like flow through? 22 MR. MULHERE: It won't be walled off. But 23 there is a requirement for a landscape buffer 24 and there' s a requirement to permit -- the 25 water Management permit requires a berm. So 20 1 you' re going to have a berm and a landscape 2 buffer. 3 MR. WESTERBELT: I just wanted to know if 4 the commercial tract will flow through. 5 MR. MULHERE: You know, it's a very good 6 point, and that's a very good suggestion. 7 And the county, I don't know what -- 8 Chris, I'm not sure how that -- what that's 9 like right here. 10 MR. SHUCART: well , there's a large pump 11 station -- 12 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, I think there's -- 13 MR. SHUCART: -- in that area. so you'd 14 have to go -- you'd have to go back around 15 there, sort of, which -- 16 MR. MULHERE: It's a really -- the county 17 usually would like to see that (inaudible) they 18 pop from one commercial location to another. 19 They can walk. 20 MR. WESTERBELT: Right. 21 MR. MULHERE: But it's a good question. 22 think there's utility improvements in the way. 23 MR. WESTERBELT: Pump station. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes, sir. 25 MR. LOVLii : Vernon Lovett. L-O-V-E-T-T. 21 1 How many acres would Tract L actually be? 2 MR. MULHERE: Oh, I got that right here. 3 Tract L is 4.17. 4 MR. LOVEii : Okay. On four, on page -- 5 item 4 on Page 4, it says recreational site for 6 uses adjacent to RV park or mobile home park 7 may be developed on a maximum of three acres . o MR. MI !! HERC• Yeah that's a good 9 question. 10 MR. LOVETT: Okay, show us where that 11 three acres is . 12 MR. MULHERE: First of all , that's a good 13 question. Over the years there has been some 14 discussion about maybe -- 15 MR. LOVETT: We live there. 16 MR. MULHERE: You live there, okay, good. 17 So it would be probably in this area right 18 here. 19 MR. LOVETT: There' s a pumping station 20 there. 21 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, on the other side of 22 it , though. You know, we'd have to -- I think 23 you can come around this way. There' s the 24 ability to create access. It can't be where 25 the lake is so, you know, we do have lake views 22 1 from that recreation tract. 2 MR. LOVETT: So pumping station will not 3 be relocated. 4 MR. MULHERE: No. 5 MR. LOVEII : So if we were to ever in the 6 immediate future decide to purchase a little 7 bit of that, would it have frontage on 41? 8 MR. MULHERE: It's conceivable that you 9 could. i just say that because the state has 10 to permit that. That's a state road and state 11 permits. 12 MR. LOVEII : Okay, so the biggest problem 13 with this kind of stuff is -- 14 MR. MULHERE: They'd be concerned about 15 the distance between these two, so you'd 16 probably have to share that access if you 17 wanted to share it. 18 MR. LOVETT: But we don't have direct 19 access from -- like riding golf carts . Because 20 the pumping station is -- 21 MR. MULHERE: So I see what you' re saying. 22 So somehow when we design it we need to create 23 a reasonable point of ingress and egress 24 between the two properties. 25 MR. LOVEii : We own some property there 23 1 that' s used as a maintenance storage there. 2 It ' s got water tanks. 3 will that be moved? 4 MR. MULHERE: I think we could design 5 it -- look, I'm not telling you that this lake 6 couldn't shift down. The permitting process 7 allows you to make minor modifications. so if nppd to get ?n 3n feet you know, we could 9 do it. But you still have to go through the 10 process. You have to go over there and show 11 them and, you know, do all that kind of stuff. 12 MR. LOVETT: Because I think we envisioned -- 13 if we did this pump house thing, it would be 14 about where the tract is, there would only be a 15 notch in that property there. 16 MR. MULHERE: Here? 17 MS. KELLY: Up above. 18 MR. LOVhii : A little bit -- yeah. 19 MR. MULHERE: well , I mean, we can cross 20 that bridge when we come to it. I mean, it' s 21 not impossible to modify the permit and change 22 the configuration. I mean, it' s not an act of 23 God. we can do it, it' s just everything takes 24 time and money. 25 MR. LOVETT: Can you give us a time 24 1 schedule that you think is reasonable for this 2 project to start developing? 3 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. Since we don't really 4 have an end user at this point and, as I said, 5 that's part of the reason for going through 6 this process. It's an expensive process and 7 time consuming, so I just want everybody to 8 appreciate that it's costing a lot of money to 9 go through this. Nobody would do it if they 10 didn't feel like they have to. It's sort of 11 like having your fingernails pulled out. 12 But having said that, I mean, I would 13 defer to you, Chris. would you like to 14 hopefully within a couple of years have -- two 15 years? Because it's going to take us another 16 six or seven months to get through the -- 17 MR. LOVETT: The point of my question is 18 for us to lobby our board we have to have some 19 kind of time frame. 20 MR. MULHERE: We got it, we got it. I 21 would say two years minimum. 22 Unless -- you know, the market's so crazy 23 out there right now. I mean, the demand is 24 very, very high. But it's all over the place. 25 MR. LOVETT: So you share our recreational 25 1 facilities? 2 MR. MULHERE: Right. 3 MR. LOVETT: And we' re in a position to 4 where that's uncertain -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Right. 6 MR. LOVETT: -- as you what's going to 7 happen there for us. We would like to have -- 2 M� M 1! HERE• You might not even need -- j .-.... i"zw:L:os�.co`. You might ya t�... a t�.r z... _=a a.z a a..�J. s 9 you might need an acre and a half. 10 MR. LOVEII : It' s a question about how 11 much money we want to borrow and whether our 12 300 people would vote for it. So we've got a -' 13 few -- 14 MR. MULHERE: Well , we put it in there, so 15 you guys let us know. 16 Mrs. Kelly? 17 MS. KELLY: Thank you. What would be the 18 time frame if we were to entertain something 19 like that? would we be able to keep it 20 undeveloped or does it have to be totally 21 developed? Say you negotiate with Chris for a 22 piece of land in the future. 23 MR. MULHERE: No, you could buy the land. 24 You don't have to develop it. 25 MS. KELLY: Even though it' s developing 26 1 all around us? 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, the use is permitted. 3 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, there would be some 4 coordination between the stormwater -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. But, I mean, you 6 don't have to develop it right away. 7 MS. KELLY: Just sit on it? 8 MR. MULHERE: I'm just saying, you have to 9 raise the money. You don't have to develop it. 10 This -- you could take a look at it, find 11 out what's the elevation. 12 Any other questions? 13 Yes, sir. 14 MR. GRIMES: Joe Grimes . 15 I notice that -- 16 THE COURT REPORTER: Okay, I'm sorry, I'm 17 just not hearing him. 18 MR. GRIMES: (Inaudible.) 19 And then you turn it back and it says 20 service stations and fuel . So which is it? 21 MR. MULHERE: Well , fuel dealers, if you 22 look at the SIC Code, that' s something 23 different than service stations . Fuel dealers 24 is a larger industrial kind of fuel dealer. 25 You wouldn't know that from looking at that, 27 1 but it's based on that SIC Code, that number 2 that's after it, 5983 to 5989. 3 Although that sounds like it might be a 4 service station, it's not. one service station 5 is permitted, or we' re requesting to have one 6 service station permitted. And service 7 stations are permitted right now. Q MR GRIMES: TS that with fuel? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yes. Gas station. 10 MR. GRIMES: It's a direct opposite of 11 what this says (inaudible) . 12 MR. MULHERE: No, it' s not the opposite, 13 because the prohibited use is not -- where it 14 says fuel dealer, that's not a gas station. 15 That is an industrial -- 16 MR. GRIMES: Jowl? 17 MR. MULHERE: Pardon? 18 MR. GRIMES: Jowl (phonetic) . 19 MR. MULHERE: See, it' s like a big -- like 20 Evans oil . 21 MR. GRIMES: All right, I understand. 22 MR. MULHERE: So that' s what that refers 23 to. But one gas station. 24 MR. GRIMES: I have another question. 25 MR. MULHERE: Yes. 28 1 MR. GRIMES: when I read through this, 2 somehow it was just kind of like listening to 3 the news when we hear somebody speaking in the 4 congress . And what all does mixed use -- could 5 the whole thing be commercial? 6 MR. MULHERE: That's a good question. 7 Yeah, it could. The flexibility, the way 8 we wrote it, we put the maximum flexibility, is 9 it could either be all residential , all 10 commercial or a mixture of both. 11 A few years ago East Naples Civic 12 Association was looking at the corridor and 13 doing some design work and they had a plan 14 developed, never got adopted, didn't go 15 anywhere, just was done. 16 This particular piece, because of its -- 17 there's a lot of small -- there's a lot of 18 10,000 square foot parcels and 20,000 square 19 foot c-3, C-4 parcels . This is 30 acres . And 20 it's not 30 acres of developable land, but it's 21 still 20 or 22 acres of developable land. 22 That he's makes it unique. Plus it's at 23 the intersection here. 24 So the East Naples Civic Association 25 identified this , they called it Navaho Trail 29 1 mixed use node or commercial node. 2 Now, as I said, it doesn't have any weight 3 in the government. It was just them planning. 4 They were just looking to try to make things 5 better at East Naples. 6 A lot of new things have happened now. 7 Now with all the development that's occurring R vol" re not no to see a lot of i ntPrest in hi ri nn 9 opportunities. That's whys we want the 10 flexibility. we don't really know right now 11 exactly which way the market' s going. One 12 thing we know, we know the commissioner in the 13 district and other folks , there's a concern 14 that East Naples has enough affordable housing. 15 And we' re not asking for that. 16 we' re even willing to restrict our 17 residential use to a marked degree so we can 18 give people a sense of comfort that we' re not 19 asking for that. 20 MR. GRIMES: I think this is the third 21 meeting I went to on that property. Nothing 22 happens. That' s the way it's been. It was 23 commercial and then assisted living. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, it was assisted 25 living. That's how -- 30 1 (Inaudible. Two people speaking at once.) 2 MR. GRIMES: -- because I had to cut my 3 melaleuca trees and they didn't. You know what 4 I mean? 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, yeah. 6 MR. GRIMES: But I just was concerned 7 about whether it could be full commercial or 8 not on that -- 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, there's a lot of the 10 exotics on that piece there. That will be 11 cleaned up. 12 MR. GRIMES: I know, but that was just a 13 joke. 14 MR. MULHERE: Were you developing the 15 property? 16 MR. GRIMES: Pardon? 17 MR. MULHERE: Were you developing it? 18 MR. GRIMES: No, I owned property. 19 MR. MULHERE: And they made you go and 20 clear the exotics? 21 MR. GRIMES: They wouldn't let me cut down 22 all those trees. I had to cut down only the 23 exotics. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes . By hand. 25 MR. GRIMES: And every time a limb fell on 31 1 the ground I had a code enforcement violation. 2 And it went on for a long time. 3 MR. MULHERE: It isn't easy. 4 MR. GRIMES: No, no, it' s not. 5 MR. MULHERE: Yes? 6 MS. KELLY: If you develop this as 7 residential , would say you describe what you R would d nut in there? 9 MR. MULHERE: It would be multi-family, 10 marketing multi-family or townhomes . Maybe 11 townhomes. Depends on, you know, what the -- 12 MS. KELLY: How many stories high? -- 13 MR. MULHERE: Right now I think we can go 14 50 feet. 15 MS. KELLY: And if it' s assisted living? 16 MR. MULHERE: Assisted living is a little 17 bit higher. 18 MR. SHUCART: I think they' re all the 19 same. 20 MS. KELLY: what about hotel? 21 MR. MULHERE: You know what, I don't -- 22 how many units? 23 MS. KELLY: No, how high. 24 MR. MULHERE: How high. Let me look, 25 because I don't want to answer something that 32 1 isn 't accurate. Just give me a second, I have 2 that document here. I have it here. 3 Okay, building height. Here we are. It's 4 50 feet. 5 MS. KELLY: Fifty feet. So it's all about 6 the same. 7 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. I just wanted to make 8 sure I didn't misspeak. 9 MS. KELLY: And where would that -- 10 MR. MULHERE: Well , they' re not going to 11 want to be invisible, so -- 12 MS. KELLY: That would probably face 41. 13 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, if a hotel went there, 14 they would want exposure. And, you know, 15 that's kind of why I said we knew that if there 16 was going to be any concerns it would come from 17 folks living close by. That's why the design 18 was to create a good separation. 19 MS. KELLY: Well , we can swim over and 20 meet you every now and then. 21 MR. MULHERE: But you'll have a landscape 22 buffer here too, and we'll make sure it's 23 substantial . 24 MS. KELLY: I' ll be over there watching. 25 MR. MULHERE: That's good. You keep us 33 1 honest. 2 You had a question? 3 MR. WEST: Cary West. 4 You say that you'd be willing to restrict 5 affordable housing. At what point in this 6 process will that come into play where that 7 actually goes on paper? 4 "D. II U •GD1 C nri !1I iQC1 f?C� — e a _ 9 MR. WEST: Are we someplace where we need 10 to voice our concerns that we don't want to see 11 more of that, or is this way ahead of the game? 12 MR. MULHERE: No, you' re not ahead of it. _ 13 This hearing that's coming up is when we intent 14 to introduce that. So that's the 21st of 15 August. We' re going to put the language in the 16 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 17 MS. KELLY: Is that an open meeting? 18 MR. MULHERE: Yes. And you should -- if 19 you' re within 500 feet, you'll all get noticed. 20 And you' ll see some signs on the property and 21 there'll be an ad in the paper. 22 MR. ZENZ: That' s it, 500 feet? That's 23 all you' re -- 24 MR. MULHERE: 500 feet of the boundary. 25 So anybody that's within 500 feet of this -- 34 1 it's larger in the rural area, it's 1,000 feet 2 in the rural area because, you know, lower 3 density involved. well , that's why they do 4 signs and the newspaper ad too. 5 Yes, sir? 6 MR. HENDERS: Jerry Henders, Trail Acres. 7 would our access (phonetic) be the preserve 8 and/or lake or would it be restricted to people 9 in the development? 10 MR. MULHERE: That's going to be a 11 stormwater lake so, i mean, i wouldn't eat 12 anything caught in it. You can catch it and 13 throw it back. 14 And as far as the preserve goes , if it's 15 developed as residential , perhaps a developer 16 would want to try to use some of it as an 17 amenity and they would put in some boardwalks. 18 But most of the time with something of that 19 size, that's not the case and it's just 20 separate. They put some signs up, this is a 21 preserve. Because the agencies are very 22 particular and sensitive about having it get 23 degraded by people using it. 24 A larger preserve, somebody would spend 25 the money to do it because they consider it to 35 1 be an amenity itself, the project. so I'm not 2 saying somebody couldn't do a multi -family 3 project and put a little thing down to the 4 lake. I mean, that could happen. That could 5 happen. 6 Yes. 7 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Chris is 8 the owner of the nrnnprty nr is he the -- 9 MR. MULHERE: Chris is the owner. 10 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, I 'm one of the owners. 11 MR. WESTGATE: Are you willing -- are you 12 partnering with a developer? Have you thought 13 about developing it yourself, or what are your 14 visions -- what are your visions for the 15 property? 16 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, our visions are as of 17 right now we don't have a lot of concrete 18 definitive plans. we want to first get through 19 the entitlement process and understand what we 20 have as far as a way of development. we are 21 looking at some joint venture commercial 22 developments. we' re looking at a number of 23 different multi-family developments. we may 24 end up selling the site. so there' s a 25 possibility of that as well too. so at this 36 1 point I can't really give you a great answer. 2 We' re looking at a lot of different avenues . 3 MR. WESTGATE: Are you a current developer 4 in the East Naples area? 5 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, we actually own the 6 shopping center right next door to the 7 property. 8 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: 9 MR. WESTGATE: So you have a vested 10 interest in East Naples. 11 MR. SHUCART: We have a vested interest 12 not only in East Naples but in this particular 13 corridor. The better this particular property 14 is developed, the better it's going to enhance 15 our property next door as well . 16 we also have an interest in Port of the 17 Islands Marina, which I still consider East 18 Naples , but -- so the better East Naples is, 19 the better even Port of the Islands will be 20 affected by it. 21 MR. WESTGATE: So you can understand the 22 concerns of the -- I don't know where you live, 23 but you can understand or share the same 24 concerns as possibly the people that live 25 within this immediate area of the -- whatever 37 1 is going to be developed on the piece of 2 property. And the limits to traffic, the type 3 of housing or type of commercial . 4 And had you ever envisioned building or 5 selling it to a developer that would build a 6 multi-family, low-income housing facility or 7 deal with somebody such as Habitat and develop o Wi t- __ have Habi tf-air develop it i nto what they -- v 9 MR. SHUCART: Absolutely not. I don't 10 think that' s really the -- I don't think that' s 11 the highest and best use for this particular 12 site. As Bob had mentioned, we' re going to — 13 write into the documents that there is market 14 rate housing not to allow an affordable housing 15 component. we don't want to see it, we don't 16 think that that's really the best use for this 17 site. There's better opportunities for it than 18 to have that. 19 MR. WESTGATE: It may be the most 20 profitable for the investor. 21 MR. SHUCART: It's not going to be. 22 Affordable housing doesn't always mean 23 profitable. And with the market the way it is 24 right now, I think there' s more profitable ways 25 to go other than affordable housing. 38 1 MR. MULHERE: And there's ample -- I mean, 2 you 've heard the argument made, but -- and 3 there hasn't been a recent study done. I don 't 4 know when the last time there was a study done 5 related to the amount of affordable housing. A 6 few years ago there was one, and it was pretty 7 substantial amount of available affordable 8 housing, in particular in East Naples . 9 So, you know, I don't -- it's tough to get 10 through the process in collier county. Just in 11 case anybody doesn't know, there's five 12 Commissioners, and in collier county to get a 13 Comprehensive Plan Amendment approved for a 14 rezone, you need four. 15 MR. WESTGATE: Once it's approved a 16 rezone -- 17 MR. MULHERE: It's called a supermajority. 18 MR. WESTGATE: But once it's approved and 19 rezoned, part of that rezoning would allow for, 20 you know 360-- 21 MR. MULHERE: well , that's why we' re 22 putting language in. 23 MR. SHUCART: That's why we' re going to 24 write the language in market rate. 25 MR. WESTGATE: Yeah, I'm not real 39 — 1 comfortable with that. I'd have to -- 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, but that's -- 3 MR. WESTGATE: what's market rate? I 4 mean, the market is -- I mean, an affordable 5 home sells for $140,000. Is that market rate? 6 MR. MULHERE: We can define -- it is 7 defined what's affordable. It' s defined by the 8 ariemt of your income, you know. that you have 9 to -- that you can afford to spend on housing. 10 And I don't have the exact formula. 11 MR. SHUCART: You get government subsidies 12 with the affordable housing. I mean, that' s -- 13 part of why people do affordable housing, 14 because of the tax incentives associated with 15 it. And that' s the element that brings in the 16 ability to offer low rent, because you get 17 government subsidy on a tax basis. 18 MR. MULHERE: I mean, we understand that 19 concern, and we want to -- 20 MR. WESTGATE: I mean, it' s a pretty 21 busy -- it' s a pretty busy intersection 22 already. so to add, you know, the density such 23 as that many units, I just don't see that it 24 could handle that much. 25 MR. MULHERE: We've been through the 40 1 traffic analysis and we' re okay with the cap 2 that they put it. It may be fewer units and 3 more commercial , it may be all commercial . But 4 there's a cap and it's the number of trips. 5 And they've done the analysis, the county' s 6 done the analysis . That's how they arrived at 7 it, that this is what the capacity is , you can 8 only have this number of trips . 9 MR. SHUCART: And also, if there's 10 additional improvements needed at that 11 intersection, there's certain triggers that 12 require improvements to that intersection 13 there. The signal 's already there, which has 14 made a big difference. And so if an extra turn 15 lane needs to be added, that has to be our 16 cost. If an extra inbound lane needs to be 17 added, that would be at our cost. And it would 18 have to -- you know, there's additional studies 19 that would have to be done in order to 20 determine if the intersection's going to 21 function properly. 22 MR. MULHERE: which you do at -- 23 MR. WESTGATE: I hope you share the same 24 value of the homeowners in the area of not 25 putting another whistler's Cove on the corner 41 1 of southwest Boulevard. 2 MR. SHUCART: 1 100 percent appreciate 3 that. And the local commissioner is adamantly 4 opposed to anything like that. 5 So if you have some other suggestions , 6 I' ll defer to Bob and our attorney as far as 7 coming up with some better language to further 3 sol i rli f , that concept Tim oven to j •..- 9 suggestions . 10 MR. WESTGATE: When Donna Fiala comes back 11 in September from her vacation, we have a 12 meeting set up with some of the other neighbors 13 and myself about how that's going to be and 14 what's going on with that. 15 MR. MULHERE: That's good. Great. 16 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Because she 17 said that stuff to us before when we had -- 18 (Inaudible. Telephone interruption.) They say 19 things and they go along with the developers. 20 MR. SHUCART: We' re open to figuring out a 21 way to bridge that gap as far as writing it in. 22 I'm not sure there's been other developers 23 that' s actually written it in before but -- 24 MR. MULHERE: No, that' s never happened. 25 MR. SHUCART: -- but Bob can speak to 42 1 that. 2 MR. WESTGATE: Because we fought against 3 having Habitat buying out properties and 4 developing a Habitat. 5 MR. MULHERE: You ' re talking about in the 6 Manor? 7 MR. SHUCART: No, they were purchasing 8 some trailers. 9 MR. WESTGATE: Some? No, a lot. In Trail 10 Acres . They destroyed First and Second Street. 11 MR. MULHERE: I didn't know that. 12 MR. WESTGATE: There's just no stopping 13 them. You know what I mean? 14 MR. MULHERE: There isn't. Because in 15 that situation there's no legal way. They have 16 the right to go buy them. I think we have to 17 have do this now at the zoning stage. And we 18 may need some -- we may need some guidance in 19 terms of the language. But we' re committing to 20 you that we' re going to put that in there and 21 we'll figure out the right way to get it in 22 there. 23 MR. SHUCART: Because we believe in the 24 same concept. I mean, that's not what's going 25 to benefit the area and it's not going to 43 1 benefit the property next door and it' s really 2 not what' s needed in the area. we've got -- 3 you know, East Naples finally has some great 4 momentum going again. And it' s nice to see the 5 things that are going on in the neighborhood. 6 The Fresh Market and the outbacks and all of 7 those things coming about. 8 M4__ WESTGATE' There's other; \Km know, 9 property. The gated communities are kind of 10 protected within their gated community as far 11 as home value. But if you' re not living in a 12 gated community, you really don't have 13 protection -- 14 MR. MULHERE: You don't, but -- 15 MR. WESTGATE: -- as far as value. so -- 16 MR. MULHERE: A rise in tide, you know, 17 floats all boats. what happens is that over 18 time the market values will increase as East 19 Naples matures and you get a lot of this really 20 nice housing selling. And even then the 21 non-gated communities , you' re going to see 22 market values go up. And there's no better 23 way -- 24 MR. WESTGATE: But they always find a way. 25 They always find a way. 44 1 MR. MULHERE: Well , right now they can do 2 it because if you go in and ask for an 3 affordable housing density bonus, the land 4 costs have gotten so high that they only way 5 you can do that, you can afford to do that, is 6 if you' re subsidized. If he had: Man. I 7 didn't know anything about that, which is very 8 hard tort as well . 9 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Across the 10 road there -- 11 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry, I didn't 12 hear what you said. 13 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: But we 14 don't want anything more like that. 15 MR. MULHERE: I understand that. 16 MR. WESTGATE: Yeah, that was actually -- 17 that was not supposed to happen. And it did. 18 MR. ZENZ: Because Fiala pushed it. She 19 pushed it. That was when they wanted 20 affordable housing. That's been going on for 21 years. That's what I'm saying, you said she 22 says no. She does. 23 MR. MULHERE: She does to us when we go 24 see her. She's pretty clear. Maybe she 25 changed her mind. 45 1 MR. ZENZ: You have Habitat. Venetian 2 Falls , which is right next to the Hitching 3 Post. 4 MR. SHUCART: Where is the Venetian Falls? 5 MR. ZENZ: Right next to Hitching Post on 6 41.. 7 MR. MULHERE: I think it's down a ways . o MR. 7c!k 7• Ti-1C r-r,ht nowt i-n thg rPH fl - 9 station. Down a ways. I think it' s called 10 Venetian. Same thing. They put that through . 11 And then there again, they gave the bonus of 12 letting more people be on that -- those are the -- 13 smallest lots . whispering Cove is the same 14 way, they stuck that in. 15 MR. MULHERE: Charlee Estates? It's a 16 Habitat project. 17 MR. ZENZ: Like I said, it' s right where 18 you go past the Hitching Post on that big empty 19 lot that's for sale. 20 MS. KELLY: No, RaceTrac is coming there. 21 RaceTrac gasoline station. 22 MR. ZENZ: No, I know. Once you go past 23 that, you' re going more south towards 951. 24 There's a whole big Habitat -- 25 MR. MULHERE: So, you know, again, we 46 1 understand that. we' re willing to put the 2 conditions in there to the best of our ability. 3 we'll work with you and we' ll keep you posted. 4 You can communicate with us as we move forward. 5 It's a public meeting on the 21st. You should 6 show up and express your concerns if you have 7 them, you know, with respect to that issue, you 8 know. 9 MR. WEST: Thanks, Chris, we'll be in 10 touch with that. 11 MR. MULHERE: I do want to see if there' s 12 any other questions before we close. 13 MR. LOVETT: On 59, correctional 14 institutions, 9223. Does that keep somebody 15 from building a facility that helps felons get 16 back on their feet? 17 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Halfway 18 houses? 19 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about 20 something like St. Matthews House? 21 MR. LOVE] I : Yes. 22 MR. MULHERE: Homeless shelters and soup 23 kitchens are prohibited. 24 MR. LOVETT: But that's -- it's not one of 25 those main things that the idea is -- 47 1 MS. KELLY: This is prohibited. 2 MR. LOVEii : That's what I'm saying. Does 3 it prohibit? 4 MR. MULHERE: I would say it does . You' re 5 talking about a rehabilitation facility. 6 MR. LOVEis : That's not a place for 7 felons. 0 Mn• R LUrr �. You' re 1L.-fa..1 ';rn about 9 rehabilitation. 10 MR. LOVETT: Rehabilitation. 11 MR. MULHERE: I don't know if there' s 12 anything that specifically works for felons . —' 13 But this -- 14 MR. LOVETT: It was just a question. 15 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, no problem. 16 Any other questions? 17 (No response.) 18 MR. MULHERE: Okay, I'm going to run out 19 to my car and get some cards . I' ll bring them 20 back in so that if somebody has a question , 21 they can call me. Sorry, I should have brought 22 them in with me, but I -- 23 MS. WHITE: I have a question. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes. 25 MS. WHITE: Is it legal for you to put in 48 1 there that you can't sell to -- 2 MR. MULHERE: Very good question. 3 MS. WHITE: And are you then by doing that 4 setting up one of those crazy lawsuits that -- 5 MR. MULHERE: No, your question is very, 6 very good. We don't know the answer to that. 7 I'll repeat the question for these guys. 8 Rich, we've got to get you in on this . 9 The question was, is it legal to put in some 10 language that would restrict the market that we 11 would sell this to. And I said I'm not sure 12 that we know the answer to that. It' s never 13 been done before. we think maybe we can do it. 14 Depending on the language we use we can do it. 15 But I'll defer because it isn't up to me. I 16 know I like to play an attorney, but I'm not 17 one, so -- 18 MR. YOVANOVICH: Our intent is to work 19 with the County Attorney and craft appropriate 20 language to assure that we deliver to you 21 everything we've committed to delivering to 22 you, which is it's going to be a mark rate -- I _ 23 would telling this gentleman, luxury. If it's 24 a rental community, it would be a luxury 25 rental . It would not be whistler's Cove. I 49 1 forget when that went through, but I think it 2 may have been before Donna became the 3 commissioner in that area. And I think it was 4 when John Norris was . I won't swear to it but 5 I think it was. 6 But you've got to remember, there were 7 different times back then regarding -- but Q ne .ay 1e1��etl r�� P'QV' W? a project that ._.�a e. �v, �.J 9 was -- did get federal subsidies to buy the 10 property. And in exchange for that they had to 11 agree to certain restrictions on affordability. 12 I believe it was a 30-year commitment, — 13 whistler's Cove. I may be off a few years, but 14 I think it was a 30-year commitment. 15 so we -- our goal is to be direct and put 16 right in the PUD that we will do -- we are not 17 doing any affordable housing and we are doing a 18 luxury rental or multi-family type project. 19 whether the County Attorney is going to let me 20 get away with being that direct, I don't know, 21 we may have to massage it a little bit to make 22 sure that we' re okay legally, but we will get 23 there. 24 MR. ZENZ: But if you change the zoning 25 and then the developer decides I don't want the 50 1 property anymore, I'm going to sell it. so the 2 next person comes in and says oh, well the 3 zonings changed and I can put 360 rental 4 residents and it's already done and over with. 5 MR. YOVANOVICH: Couple things you have to 6 factor in and do your own homework. one, you 7 have to factor in land price, that goes in a 8 prorated cost. Then you have to build it, so 9 you have to figure your construction cost. By 10 the time you figure all that in, you have to 11 make a profit on the rents. At some point I 12 think the math is going to show you that it's 13 not going to be an affordable housing project. 14 Because when you throw all of those costs in, 15 and you want to make a profit, you' re not going 16 to be able to rent it to people who qualify for 17 low-income housing. 18 MR. MULHERE: But I just want to also -- I 19 mean, if we put a condition in there, it runs 20 with the zoning. You can sell the land, but 21 you' re still subject to the same conditions. 22 It does not go away if it's sold. It runs with 23 the land. That's why we' re suggesting you put 24 it in zoning. Because you can't get around 25 that. You can change -- you can go in and 51 1 rezone it if you want, but then we'll have 2 another information meeting and then -- yes? 3 MR. SCHMIDT: If I can, Bob had mentioned 4 earlier as well that language about the kind of 5 housing they propose might even appear in the 6 Comprehensive Plan itself. And that's just 7 another level of protection you would have. o M M �L ucac• Tr. .'s -+ would k Ana irder 1-o .'1&c. V i V L..$t a...::s.c �'- _ t 5.� c 154 5 i.i a..t _. J 9 change that. very good point. 10 MR. SCHMIDT: We've got two layers of 11 protection that would end up controlling the 12 property. 13 MR. WEST: what about the difference 14 between -- you know, there's a difference 15 between a rental development and a -- 16 MR. MULHERE: Fee simple owned. That you 17 cannot regulate. That is a form of ownership. 18 zoning has nothing to do it whether it' s a 19 rental apartment or a fee simple owned. The 20 way to get it is to make it market rate. 21 MS. WAGNER: Melody Wagner. 22 I guess I want clarification. The way 23 it' s zoned right now, you' re saying four units 24 per acre. 25 MR. MULHERE: Correct. 52 1 MS. WAGNER: I just did the math, and with 2 only 22 acres, that means 16 plus eight units 3 per acre now. 4 MR. MULHERE: It's actually based on the 5 total acreage. You go with the 30, not the 22 . 6 MS. WAGNER: Oh, I see. 7 MR. MULHERE: It's based on the total . 8 It's actually 12. It's below 12 , it's 11.7, I 9 think. 10 MS. WAGNER: And I guess -- you said 50 11 feet. How many stories is that 50? 12 MR. MULHERE: Four. Four. In today's -- 13 under today's high ceiling market. Four 14 stories, three or four. Some people don't 15 build four, they only build three. 16 MS. WAGNER: That's still a huge building. 17 MR. MULHERE: well , the setback, there's 18 further setback. Besides the buffer, there' s a 19 setback requirement too, and that's based -- 20 the setback is largely based on the height of 21 the building. 22 MR. YOVANOVICH: I think something you 23 really have to factor in. The existing zoning, 24 the front of it that fronts commercial , it's 25 already zoned commercial for that. And the 53 1 back is basically the residential type of use. 2 That zoning really hamstrings the ability to 3 develop a quality project on this property 4 because you' re going to have strip retail up 5 front because you've got a long narrow piece. 6 And you' re going to have a relatively low 7 density project that you can't amenitize. So R ern;'' ra nnt- nni nn -f— nat- thin hi nh-anw 9 residential uses on that property on a small 10 little piece that you can't provide any 11 amenities to as far as zoning. 12 So what this is going to give the 13 developer is the flexibility to provide a 14 multi-family project that can have appropriate 15 amenities that will increase market values 16 around you, or provide appropriate commercial 17 that will increase the property values over 18 what currently can be built on the property. 19 It' s a tough piece of property to develop 20 with quality development. 21 MS. WAGNER: well , if you' re familiar with 22 Mercado -- 23 MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm very familiar. 24 MS. WAGNER: -- you've got mixed use. And 25 you've got mixed -- you've got commercial on 54 1 the first layer and then you've got one or two 2 layers of high-end residential . 3 MR. MULHERE: On some of the buildings. 4 MR. YOVANOVICH: And if you' re familiar 5 with the condo and you' re familiar with Bay 6 Front, Bay Front they can't keep quality 7 commercial in there. They -- I'm telling you, 8 I mean, I represent them, okay. So I know it's 9 been a struggle to get that retail space 10 leased. They sold the units quick, but the 11 retail is -- 12 MR. MULHERE: It's taken Mercado a long 13 time too, but -- 14 MR. YOVANOVICH: The exact opposite 15 happened in Mercado. They filled up -- 16 MR. MULHERE: The commercial . 17 MR. YOVANOVICH: -- the commercial . But 18 the residential is tough to sale. I mean, 19 mixed use is really not making it in Naples. 20 MR. MULHERE: We do allow it. We allow 21 it. And so if we got the right mix of uses, 22 something like that could happen. 23 My guess is it would probably be more like 24 commercial in a separate multi -family building. 25 Not necessarily in the same building, but same 55 1 campus. 2 MR. SHUCART: Similar to Naples Square 3 downtown, they've got a 20-acre piece. 4 Three-quarters of it in the rear is going to be 5 residential and then the commercial will front 6 on 41. Now, it's considered a quote, unquote 7 mixed use, but it's not the residential over o tht rr�mmPrci?1 .... i2 i� �V..S:9 V i:A S 9 I think, you know, as Rich said, it's not 10 really been a proven entity anywhere in town. 11 Even on Fifth Avenue it's struggled. You know, 12 to live above commercial is a younger type of 13 mentality. But you've got to have a certain 14 number of income to live in that area and it 15 just -- they' re almost polar opposites. 16 So I see it as more residential in the 17 rear and then more the commercial frontage type 18 in the front if it goes that direction. 19 MS. WAGNER: What is the acreage of the 20 commercial that's available according to right 21 now? 22 MR. MULHERE: Right now? 23 MR. SHUCART: Just under 10 or right at 24 nine. 25 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, eight or nine acres. 56 1 MS. WAGNER: And this would increase that. 2 MR. MULHERE: This would allow you to do 3 all commercial , all residential or a mixture of 4 both. 5 MR. SHUCART: And right now there's 6 115,000 square feet of commercial on the nine 7 acres. So percentage-wise there'll be -- if 8 the entire site is developed as commercial , it 9 would be -- 10 MR. MULHERE: Less intense. Because we' re 11 capped at 250. So right now it allows 115 on 12 nine acres . If we did it all commercial at 13 250, that would be on 22 acres. So it's a less 14 intensity. 15 MR. SHUCART: Well , really it would be 30 16 acres. 17 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, hopefully. 18 Any -- it's 6: 30. I want to kind of wrap 19 it up, but I also want to make sure I answer 20 any of your questions. So any last questions? 21 (No response.) 22 MR. MULHERE: Really appreciate your 23 coming. I'm sure you've going to think of some 24 more questions. I'm going to run out to the 25 car and get my cards . If you want to call me, 57 1 you can. some people don't like to ask 2 questions in a group. 3 (At which time, this meeting concluded at 4 6: 30 p.m.) 5 6 7 0 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 58 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 4 state of Florida ) 5 County of Collier ) 6 7 I, CHERIE' NOTTINGHAM, Notary Public, in 8 and for the state of Florida at Large, certify that I 9 was authorized to and did stenographically report the 10 foregoing proceedings. 11 12 I further certify that I am not a relative, 13 employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties, 14 nor am I financially interested in the action. 15 16 Dated this 21st day of July, 2014. 17 18 ah Yl'G CAlo-tb-114evo 19 CHERIE' R. NOTTINGHAM Gregory Court Reporting 20 2650 Airport Road south 4it;a= "8e/,, CHERIE R.NOTTINGHAM Naples, Florida 34112 21 * MY COMMISSION#FF 131691 My Commi s s i on No. FF 131691 yi" EXPIRES:July 12,2018 Expires: July 12 , 2018 22 „,,FF000! Bonded Thru Budget Notary Services 23 24 25 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS /'--\ (Section 10.03.00,COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE(LDC) A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supercede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to Section 10.03.00 of the LDC. 1. The sign(s)must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails, staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s)in place,and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s)is destroyed,lost, or rendered unreadable,the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POS 1'ED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER GMPA--PL20130001767/CP-2013-:10 HOLE MONTES, INC. SIGlATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP 950 ENCORE WAY, NAPLES, FL 34110 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 27th day of February , 200-15 by ROBERT J. MULHERE ,personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. ,411Y-" STEPHANIE KAROL Signature bf Notary Public MY COMMISSION#EE 163504 4—,kg EXPIRES:March 9,2016 "StmtilIV Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Stephanie Karol f*-■ Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) g t lit"t! r, 446.4 10i t T i ?i. I, . -alt .t = . 4,.. lit,)2 i, 4#,,,,N r t I t + � fit:it ; „ , t. to a 4 I f T a ttt . as .4E.; 111'71 .iiiliy -tat a {I Z 0 ire W 7.::;16.;aria i.t t z CC mt 4 P I'W • .4 L'0' kill gib /1 . gi it �`A y ` 1° Y 4t: rTe v fir, y�r. .� '-'''.47....,. e+.. n w ti i tx c= i ■ _ Sti!.';0_ r,,,I tbc..„,_"2:1 - *� OW., ni ,,,,:; ' di;W"�.: emu. taS4 al. r41.4. 14- ,d 14 61 ril 4'4 d!I% Z¢ su , Qt .Wa- a.E Si I r- S9 t* 't7 . tea • •— 7k C to .*' :,,,f i sz ▪ .r: irs 0 Z 2E •XWE'1.- tei'W''4 L' a•Tr '.4 C: 1E %AA 2 -,,,.. 'gi•g' ctw.,t, 2100 OA)` a {' �, r[y #�3 # '' 1�, ', xF i • '6,1%. i 4 % �Sgt a . : '' '4' . ' ''''i.:' ''''.:'0 �.as .t`�(�,# s odt�� T I •��, — .e '* #r'*'',.sue°, -# �' ' a 0: I- ri .1 •1.) lit � - ,. . 3 ' . i . - -. 4 5i-'X-'la I 111.111.1111WJ- 4 ',1--;',,„.,,, 7 4,1* ' R , 1 + iitett a #. x • ts !Ijtfli1h w ill i 1-1i-f!il i-; i .'...' , -,, ."-•*,,,,,,k,..,:a,,,:'.:414. pia # I" , to 2 �.� - t ' ill iii ilt1 ;'.4 V ' ' 1 11 ., , , 7,::.,„c.."...,,,,,,,,i,:::;;2. , 4 . 3n -, .. 1.,_ ,„1:14.v4,4„., ,,, f';;11 • . „: , 611 . i , `' --- - • M e Z r` y _ r- � ;f! �fny-�E �� iir $ g rti 8. LIU Z ' M , 111.0 LD tt, h -I 4 -s�V4 .r 3 is 11, lia 144`" y'" .. s is ar f ::, r` w r"ch. v;11r.0 iii 4' I el en EL = I— ��i E.W . tt3� fi v • o .s eeNi 4 !ix limor"s". Ics' 2 S tilq %al 1 1 k anto w .° • '61 * * 011 kr gt 44 } 1� i r * '#4. t7.: ° 1 ; te IF 113 um,c ' � sad I!: , 41r. .4c 3 r f ,x Ili ` • AGENDA ITEM 9-C Cotner County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING SERVICES—PLANNING&ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION--PLANNING &REGULATION HEARING DATE: MARCH 19, 2015 SUBJECT: PETITION PUDZ-PL20130001726; VINCENTIAN VILLAGE PUD (COMPANION TO PETITION CP-2013-10/PL20130001767) OWNER/APPLICANT: Global Properties of Naples, LLC do Christopher Shucart 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 Naples,FL 34103 AGENTS: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Richard Yovanovich,Esquire Hole Montes, Inc. Yovanovich&Koester,P.A. 950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 Naples,FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for an amendment to the existing PUD zoned project to allow numerous changes in conjunction with a proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment as noted above. For more details,please refer to the"Purpose and Description of Project"section of this staff report. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 30.68± acres, is located at the southeast corner of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (see location map on the following page) PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 1 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 a. / , t /P xial U' W° 211 i N o J t a. Q 1 rg77% i .,:::1111!1::11 HO 1 OIVLIIIVII I W"-'" f r! 2 alai R:Pc0' mum. z ci- r# dol. 0 iii;i :, - Z :c1 " 1411)004:1111NIMOOP An e 4115`4,447"\I 11 i'111#44 '',0* 1 ' :: IPOP10,497 **7 07 ., A* #cr. • • > °P VNP-*V 4"*# 40 4k, ,■ 4, .1& ..o, .■ .., R , At* *# Al■ No ,A a E a sg $ i P. V" :� € III" ,/ - iii :t 4 Vti. mar-Mg lite— _ . , ___ A Pi 1 .., —....wino.YTS ` N -usr ent 1 I3 NN, 12r 1 it. 1 ,n 1 ir 1: 1 g ,Y 91 ffi r ,E Q 0Q 0 Z 5 8 ).,h e�. !I r 0 0 m awa crave uNroo 4�,a i v+ , !,. g- :i...j___,\i :1 la t1 g 1• _ L - i ,, )4'6' 1 .' 1 I m , .t. . rijL • i E ,N--ative Vegetation and Open Space 1N; C-5 ZONING Existing Native Vegetation= 29.77 Ac. ,' • GAS WHISTLER'S Min On-site Native Preservation Req'd STATION, 20' TYPE "D" _ 29.77x15%=4.46 Ac. LANDSCAPE COVE - PUD Min Open Space Req'd(Comm.or Mixed-Use) , 30.68x30°/ =9.20 Ac GP�.c, ,� �� BUFFER 1 Min Open Space Required(Residential Only) \ i 0.68 x 60% =18.41 Ac J �P,- // /�\ 20' TYPE "D" \s ` , \ '9 / 1 �J� '' LANDSCAPE `♦ �o '7/7 .\ I ,;TRAIL ACRES ,�� / BUFFER a 'Q�,) \\ o z� ,00 RSF-4 ZONING, �0 , , O� �i \ // 3 TRACT "M U" N ,/ MIXED USE \� LANDSCAPE BUFFER , • �� EXISTING 15'U.E. i H;'\ PER LDC REQUIREMENTS \ EXISTING 15'U.E.--.- as �` DEVIATION #2 A \\\ WALL LOCATION POTENTIAL FUTURE H = a m `� BIKEIPED 415.31�U. 6j N. INTERCONNECTION �_ � •,, - 15'TYPE "B" • LANDSCAPE 2so2 s• sue 15' TYPE "B" v) w • BUFFER O ■ LANDSCAPE p . ` BUFFER t� w Y Q TRACT "P" o PRESERVE TRACT = �• Land Use Summary • EXISTING 15'U. .\\ LAKE Description Acreage Percent ,X \ Mixed-Use(Tract MU) 22.05 71.9% , ■ N. EXISTING 15'U.E. Lake(Tract L) 4.17 13.6% Preserve(Tract P) 4.46 14.5% EXISTING 15'U.E. TOTAL 30.68 100.0% — 4- .. Maximum Dwelling Units:224 LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS TRAIL ACRES RSF-4 ZONING A. Commercial Only Development: Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area(GFA),and one hotel(maximum of 150 rooms),and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable commercial CFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. B. Mixed Use(Residential and Commercial)Development: The commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses,and a 150-room hotel and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR.Additionally,for every acre of hotel or Assisted Living Facility,the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,0(10 square feet.Residential density shall be limited to 224 multifamily residential dwelling units,calculated on the gross acreage of the property,exclusive of any commercial portions. Ilinfl 950 Encore Way VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD 'o RN ay mK o01o1/2014 ' Naples,FL.34110 Phone:(239)254-2000 MASTER PLAN a M N.M. °D1/2014 HOLE MONTES Florida Certificate of VERIICAL�fA ALE N/ ENGINEERSRANNERS•SURVEYORS Authorization No.1772 EXHIBIT C REVISED:2-12-2015 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject site is currently undeveloped and wooded with large portions occupied by Pine Flatwoods and Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm combinations. The subject site was originally rezoned to PUD in Ordinance#85-27 as the Vincentian Residence PUD,which was repealed by Ordinance#91-88, which was repealed by Ordinance #99-77. That ordinance is the current PUD ordinance governing uses on this site. That PUD rezone changed the name to just the "Vincentian PUD." That ordinance allows up to 40 residential units (4 units per acre(upa); up to 115,000 square feet of commercial uses; and assisted living facilities or other group care facilities at a FAR of 0.45. The allowable commercial uses include all C-2 uses, and 1 some C-3 and C-4 uses. The agent provided the following list of changes contained in this amendment as shown below: • Both allow a mix of commercial and residential uses • Residential: o Original PUD: • Allowed 4 du. 's per gross acre on approximately 9.8 acres, for 39 d.u. 's o Proposed MPUD: • Allows 7.3 du/acre on entire site, max. 224 d.u. 's • Limits to multifamily residential uses • Commercial:: o Original PUD: • 8.5 acre tract • Up to 115,000 SF retail/office or hotel(13,529 SF per acre) • C-2 uses (in effect as of date of ordinance, which included automobile service station and group care facilities) • Additional C-3 and C-4 uses allowed: amusement and recreation services, auto and home supply stores, business services, drinking places, hospitals, membership organizations, misc. retail, museums and art galleries, paint/glass/wallpaper stores, public administration, non- depository credit institutions, real estate, retail nurseries, social services, used merchandise stores, USPS • ALF at 0.45 FAR o Proposed MPUD: • Up to 250,000 SF of commercial(8,148 SF per acre) • C-3 zoning district uses, including those allowed as conditional uses, and department store, hotel, dental laboratories, and nursing and personal care facilities. • ALF at 0.60 FAR PUDZ-Pf_20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 2 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 fl • Intensity/density standards: o Proposed MPUD: • Site can be developed as residential OR commercial OR a mixture of commercial and residential. • Total intensity/density allowed to be capped by trip generation rate — limited to average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 1,107 total trips. • Limits, in a mixed-use scenario, the amount of commercial to 10 acres and a maximum of 128,000 SF. • Reduces, in a commercial only scenario, the amount of commercial by 10,000 SF for every 1 acre developed as hotel or ALF. • Height limitations: o Original PUD: • 55'for multifamily residential • 50'for commercial o Proposed MPUD • 35'for multifamily residential(limited to two-story) • 45'for commercial • Setbacks from adjacent properties(perimeter PUD setbacks): o Original PUD: • None o Proposed MPUD: • From US 41 &Southwest Blvd: 50' • From RSF-4 zoned property: 75' • From MH zoned property: 75' • From C-3 zoned property: 25' • Native preservation: o Original PUD: • 11.7 acre reserve/conservation tract o Proposed MPUD: • Abide by current regulations, depending on how developed: • If commercial: 15%of existing native vegetation(4.46 acres) • If residential or mixed-use: 25% of existing native vegetation (7.44 acres). • The site contains approximately 29.77 acres of native vegetation, of which approximately 37 percent(11.12 acres) is covered with more than 75 percent exotic vegetation. Proposed MPUD contains the option to mitigate for up to 2.78 acres (25% of 11.12 acres) off-site, either by monetary payment or PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 3 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 land donation, consistent with the Vincentian Subdistrict of the GMP. • Open space: o Original PUD: • Min. 30% o Proposed MPUD: • Min. 30%if commercial or mixed-use • Min. 60%if residential only • Residential design standards: o Original PUD: • None o Proposed MPUD: • Architectural theme • Residential amenities • Resort-style swimming pool. • Clubhouse. • Fitness center. • Dog park • Children's playground area/tot lot. • Tennis court or bocce ball court. • Gated entry. • On-site property management if developed as a rental community. • Residential construction standards: o Original PUD: is None o Proposed MPUD: • Concrete Masonry Unit construction and stucco, or approved equivalent. • Cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent. • Minimum 9-foot ceiling heights within first floor of units. • Concrete pavers at entrance/exit. Although not noted above,the applicant is also seeking to change the project name from the Vincentian PUD to the Vincentian Village PUD. Access to the site is proposed to be garnered from one access point on Tamiami Trail and two access points on Southwest Blvd. The applicant is seeking approval of three deviations. PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 4 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), then Whistler's Cove PUD, a developed rental apartment community approved at a density of 10 units per acre(Ordinance#97-1) East: Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, a co-operative park owned by the residents with 368 lots on 44± acres (8.4 units per acre), and a Collier County Utility use, then the Hitching Post Commercial Parcel, a developed commercial center that is zoned C-3 with a Conditional Use to allow a coin operated amusement arcade(Resolution#11-102) South: Trail Acres subdivision, a developed single-family neighborhood zoned RSF-4, developed at 4 units per acre West: Trail Acres subdivision, a developed single-family neighborhood zoned RSF-4,developed at 4 units per acre, and a commercial strip along US 41 developed with a gas station and various vacant commercial structures zoned C-5 }„'1 M4• yt .-ter 1 +h VAN, d _$9 ., 4,; • ,' s.• ?;s■ ` (DO r+.4 ry4 . at)i i i 1, t1" . •. •"S • d :.*1 e ,t;,. Y 4 M.7 9:• 1',-.44„.., v y�l� If •,-.∎4;11•1'..A,.:1,4,,,- :29:;;'4t'i1'K�, "4.,µ77Y p .�,H • wr ' � • 44,r A �..1`h 7.,,-. ..^7 0 rte{ 1 , " -±. 4.oC ! 3'�:' N ♦ �( 1 zzi''''0:94;K 1. y S r 4 VON...''. t`il.to i .t-! lt^ ;a .''� h 't 4,'N f a:{�t !V,' ` � ft�i ' K;fit. A l• M g I jR }{yv". • • 'r T: v•(•♦ •�f:,1,• 1:(t,� p• Y'r,,� .4; •s"4.R, 4 4 ,w `4.''''''h `P 4 7� .. r v j``' `tt 3. V: " .,.fit „ ,a,-tre 8 .•i ,st.?—. 1.', ,vie ‘.44. d'ir. ' 4;4 ,.., ';it'IP;""liP4-:■-.ft..:+ *- .13. , Aerial Photo (subject site depiction is approximate) PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 5 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:, Future Land Use Element: Please see attached February 25, 2015 memo from Corby Schmidt, AICP,Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation& Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 4.5 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained if the PUD is developed as commercial. If the PUD is developed as residential or mixed-use (residential&commercial),then a minimum of 7.44 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained. The PUD will allow up to 2.78 acres of native vegetation to be satisfied off-site in accordance with the provisions of the LDC and proposed Vincentian GMP Subdistrict. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the application. The Vincentian Village PUD demonstrates significant impacts, but does not cause adverse impacts. It can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. ANALYSIS; Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08.F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report(referred to as"Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances, the PUD does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). The deviation on when native vegetation can be satisfied off-site is being requested by the GMP amendment, not the PUD. The applicable provision from Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances is included below. (m) Scope of land development project reviews. The EAC shall review the following: (1) Any PUD that requests a deviation from environmental standards of the LDC or any development order that requests a deviation from the provisions identified in GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13). CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13) identifies the deviation process for several CCME provisions, including Policy 6.1.1 (10), the provision for off-site retention of native vegetation. Staff's analysis of the PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 6 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 applicant's request for this deviation is included in the transmittal staff report for the proposed GMP amendment. The above referenced CCME Policies are as follows. (10) The County shall adopt land development regulations that allow for a process whereby a property owner may submit a petition requesting that all or a portion of the native vegetation preservation retention requirement to be satisfied by a monetary payment, land donation that contains native vegetative communities equal to or of a higher priority as described in Policy 6.1.1 (4) than the land being impacted, or other appropriate method of compensation to an acceptable land acquisition program, as required by the land development regulations. The monetary payment shall be used to purchase and manage native vegetative communities off-site. The land development regulations shall provide criteria to determine when this alternative will be considered. The criteria will be based upon the following provisions: a. The amount, type, rarity and quality of the native vegetation on site; b. The presence of conservation lands adjoining the site; c. The presence of listed species and consideration of Federal and State agency technical assistance; d. The type of land use proposed, such as, but not limited to, affordable housing; e. The size of the preserve required to remain on site is too small to ensure that the preserve can remain functional; and f, Right of Way acquisitions for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area. The land development regulations shall include a methodology to establish the monetary value, land donation, or other appropriate method of compensation to ensure that native vegetative communities not preserved on-site will be preserved and appropriately managed off-site. (13) The County may grant a deviation to the native vegetation retention requirements of sub- sections 2, 4, 5, 10, and 12 of this Policy, and shall adopt land development regulations to set forth the process for obtaining a deviation. The regulations shall allow for the granting of a deviation by the appropriate review board after a public hearing, and for the granting of a deviation administratively. The County shall consider the amount and type of native vegetation and the presence of listed species in determining whether the granting of a deviation requires a public hearing, or may be granted administratively The County may grant a deviation if.' a. County, Federal or State agencies require that site improvements be located in • areas which result in an inability to meet the provisions of this Policy, or b. On or off-site environmental conditions are such that the application of one or more provisions of this Policy is not possible or will result in a preserve area of lesser quality, or c. The strict adherence to these provisions will not allow for the implementation of other Plan policies that encourage beneficial land uses. PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 7 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 School Board Review: At this time there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development for the elementary, middle and high school levels. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a determination of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat, the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the development is located in or adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues as well as roadway capacity, and recommends approval subject to the Developer/owner commitments as provided in the PUD ordinance. Appropriate mitigation measures in the form of proportionate share for signal improvements, and turn lane improvements/access management restrictions are proposed at the intersections of Southwest Boulevard and US-41, and on Southwest Boulevard at both 1st Street and 2nd Street. Zoning Services Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location. Zoning staff had concerns about this project. Staff believes in its present form, it will be compatible with and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. Staff offers the following analysis of this project. The original PUD approved residential and commercial uses, with the commercial uses located within 8.5 acres that fronted US 41 and that were in line with the C-3 and C-5 uses,as show on the excerpt from the PUD map below in gold. Ae s,, • Commercial AIL portion Residential _ portion fir ENTLAP! The currently proposed Master Plan would allow commercial uses to be developed anywhere on site either alone or with residential development. Staff still is of the opinion the previous site plan layout would be more compatible with the adjacent residential uses in the mobile home park and in the Trail Acres subdivision. However the applicant has made revisions since the project was first submitted to address staff's concerns. The application has been revised. The list of uses had been modified to remove some more intense commercial uses, the residential density has been reduced, the size of the commercial area has been limited, any Automotive Vehicle dealer use PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 8 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 would require a conditional use application, and the number of fast food uses has been limited to two restaurants. The applicant has agreed to include an amenity package no later than issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 100th dwelling unit. Amplified sound has been limited as to location and timing. Relationship to Existing and Future Land Uses: A discussion of this relationship, as it applies specifically to Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of the uses that would be permitted if the proposed zoning action is approved, to the requirement or limitations set forth in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The proposed uses, as limited in the PUD document, are consistent with the GMP if the proposed amendment is approved, as previously noted. The actual uses proposed, as limited in the PUD document, should be compatible with the land uses that have been developed on adjacent tracts with the additional limitations that have been included in the PUD document. The Master Plan show a 20 foot type D landscape buffer along US 41 and Southwest Blvd., and a 15 foot type B landscape buffer along the boundary shared with Trail Acres. Along the eastern boundary, the buffer would be determined by the LDC requirements based upon what is developed on site. Deviation #3 seeks relief from the Group Housing standards to allow a 0.6 FAR for Group Housing units which is appropriate. All references to an FAR for a hotel use should be removed from the PUD document. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking three deviations. The petitioner has provided justification in support of the deviations. Deviations are a normal derivative of the PUD zoning process following the purpose and intent of the PUD zoning district as set forth in LDC Section 2.03.06 which says in part: It is further the purpose and intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design, and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control. PUDs. . . . may depart from the strict application of setback, height, and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum standards by which flexibility may be accomplished, and while protecting the public interest. . . Staff has analyzed the deviation requests and has provided the analyses and recommendations below. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet for local street rights-of-way, to allow for a minimum 42 foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 9 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 is Petitioner's Rationale: The justification is a 42 foot right-of-way will be sufficient for the scale of the proposed development and will provide an adequate cross-section to meet ingress/egress, drainage, and utilities requirements while maintaining public safety. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.H Wall requirement between residential and nonresidential development, which requires, wherever a nonresidential development lies contiguous to a residentially zoned district, that a masonry wall, concrete or pre-fabricated concrete wall and/or fence be constructed on the nonresidential property, no less than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district, to allow the wall to be located more than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district,as generally depicted on Exhibit C,Master Plan. Petitioner's Rationale: The justification is that placing the wall along the nonresidential development side of the preserve and buffer areas will allow a more natural, less developed view into the property from adjacent residentially zoned lands, more consistent with existing conditions, and yet still provide adequate buffering between residential and nonresidential uses. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 Group Housing, which establishes a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45 for care units, assisted living units, continuing care retirement communities, nursing homes, and dwelling units that are part of an aging-in-pace [sic] living environment,to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6 for an Assisted Living Facility. Petitioner's Rationale: The justification is that this deviation is typically granted and the increased FAR is consistent with that needed in order to accommodate Assisted Living Facilities. PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 10 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 i Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety l' and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h,the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal t application of such regulations." FINDINGS OF FACT: { LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires 1 the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below. [Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold, non-italicized font]: i PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the 1 CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): { 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to E physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 1 Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and believes the uses and property g development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The commitments made by the applicant and staff's recommended stipulations should provide adequate assurances that the proposed change should not adversely affect living conditions in the area. 1 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. i Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). '. Staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives 1 and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion and the zoning analysis of this staff report. Based on those staff analyses, planning zoning staff is of the opinion that this 1 PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 11 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 a petition may be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element contingent upon Board , approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition GMPA- i PL2014-113,to amend the Subdistrict language. , I 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Staff has provided a review of the proposed uses. The uses in the existing PUD were deemed compatible, but the uses are changing as part of this amendment. Staff initially had t concerns about the potential intensity of the proposed project. The petitioner has revised g the list of uses and added other safeguards to address staff's concerns. Staff is of the opinion that the uses will be compatible. s B i S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of native preserve aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the t LDC. B 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. r i The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this 1 time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. The project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are I sought. Additionally, the PUD document contains additional developer commitments that should help ensure there are adequate facilities available to serve this project. i t 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as road capacity,wastewater disposal system, and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting 1 F public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 1 1 The petitioner is seeking approval of three deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC f Section 2.03.06.A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development 1 standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff has provided an t PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 12 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 i 1 i analysis of the deviations in the Deviation Discussion portion of this staff report, and is recommending approval of the deviations. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, &policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The zoning analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed amendment. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUDZ application consistent with the Future Land Use Element contingent upon Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition GMPA-PL2014-113, to adopt the Subdistrict language. The petition can be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP contingent upon Board approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment if staff's stipulations are adopted. 2. The existing land use pattern; Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the"Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis. Staff believes the proposed amendment is appropriate given the existing land use pattern if limitations are imposed to keep the project more in scale with a neighborhood center commercial development, and development restrictions included in the PUD Ordinance. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; The proposed PUD amendment would not create an isolated zoning district because the subject site is already zoned PUD. No land is being added to the PUD as part of this amendment. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Staff is of the opinion that the district boundaries are logically drawn given the current property ownership boundaries and the existing PUD zoning. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed amendment is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such the amendment to allow the owner the opportunity to develop the land with uses other than what the existing zoning district would allow. PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 13 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 Without this amendment, the property could be developed in compliance with the existing PUD ordinance regulations. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed amendment, with the commitments made by the applicant and the stipulations offered by staff, can been deemed consistent County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The project includes numerous restrictions and standards that are designed to address compatibility of the project. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD amendment should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project with the mitigation that will be provided by the developer (Developer Commitments). Staff believes the petition can be deemed consistent with the Transportation Element of the GMP. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed amendment should not create drainage or surface water problems. The developer of the project will be required to adhere to a surface water management permit from the SFWMD -in conjunction with any local site development plan approvals and ultimate construction on site. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this amendment petition is approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. The setbacks and project buffers will help insure that light and air to adjacent areas will not be substantially reduced. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market conditions. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 14 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 The proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; If the proposed development complies with the Growth Management Plan through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations; however, the petitioner is seeking this amendment in compliance with LDC provisions for such action. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; As noted previously, the applicant has reduced the intensity and density of the proposed project which keeps the proposed project more in line with the scale of the neighborhood. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the proposed GMPA and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The proposed amendment is consistent with the GMP as it is proposed to be amended as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Additional development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration. This project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 15 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. is NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING: The applicant's agents conducted a duly noticed NIM on July 17, 2014, at South Regional Library. Please see the attached NIM synopsis and Question and Answer sheets provided by the agent. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on February 19,2015. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward PETITION PUDZ-PL20130001726 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval subject to the approval of the companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition GMPA-PL2014-113,to amend the Subdistrict language. PUDZ-Pt.20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 16 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/26/15 PREPARED BY: B.P/41-44)( 021/ ti..5--- KA ESELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DAT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWED BY: �� a - 2g is RAY ND V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVED BY: ) *A\ -) NICKCASALA GUIDA,ADMIK{STRA`IOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Tentatively scheduled for the April 28,2015 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Attachment: NIM synopsis February 25, 2015 memo from Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section PUDZ-PL20130001726;Vincentian PUD Page 17 of 17 March 19,2015 CCPC Revised: 2/17/15 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEE[ING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEEIING Naples, Florida July 17, 2014 The following Neighborhood Information Meeting was held at the Collier County South Regional Library, 8065 rely cultural Parkway, Naples , Florida, commencing at 5:30 p.m. Present: christoDher Shucart, Developer Bob Muliere, Hole-Montes Key Deselem, Planner Corby Schmidt, County Rich Yovanovich, Esquire ALSO PRESENT: Approximately 25 attendees . TAKEN BY: CHERIE' R. NO[ [ INGHAM certified Professional Court Reporter Gregory Court Reporting, Inc. 2650 Airport Road South Naples, Florida 34112 (239)774-4414 2 1 MR. MULHERE: Okay, can you hear me okay? 2 Good. 3 My name is Bob Mulhere. First of all , 4 thank you for coming. I know everybody has a 5 busy schedule and I'm glad you showed some 6 interest and that you' re able to attend. 7 My name is Bob Mulhere. I work for a 8 company called Hole Montes. It's a civil 9 engineering and planning company with offices 10 in Naples for, I don 't know, since 1966. The 11 company's been here a long time. 12 My client is Chris shucart, and Chris owns 13 the property that we' re going to talk about. 14 And here comes Rich Yovanovich right now. 15 And Rich is our land use attorney on the 16 project. we'll introduce him. Oh, Rich 17 Yovanovich, welcome, welcome. 18 Also here tonight from the county, Kay 19 Deselem, who is the planner reviewing the 20 project, zoning elements of the project. And 21 Corby is the comprehensive planning staff 22 member who will be reviewing one of the other 23 petitions we have, which is comprehensive 24 planning. Corby Schmidt. And then they can 25 answer questions that maybe I -- while I 3 1 probably would try to answer them, some 2 questions are better for the staff. So I'll 3 defer to them as it comes up. 4 By way of very quick background, I worked 5 for the county for almost 15 years. 14 years. 6 I let, the county in 2001, so I've been in the 7 private sector doing -- I've continued to do a 8 lot of work for the county in terms of planning 9 consultation for other counties in Southwest 10 Florida, preparing land use plans, but I also 11 work for private sector clients too, and that's 12 what I'm doing here tonight. 13 so these neighborhood information 14 meetings, I don't know if you've been to one 15 before, really, developers who are smart 16 wouldn't need a rule to require them to do 17 this, they would do it anyway. Because nobody 18 would really want to be surprised getting to a 19 public hearing and find out that there's a 20 roomful of people in opposition, when perhaps 21 simply having a meeting before the hearing 22 would allow the developer to explain what he's • 23 asking for, allow the neighbors to understand 24 what's being asked for and allow the developer 25 to hear any concerns and then think about how 4 1 they might adjust and react to those concerns. 2 But a while back now, 20 -- maybe in 2000 3 whatever, the county, rewrote this requirement 4 for a neighborhood information meeting. so you 5 have to have this neighborhood information 6 meeting and you have to have it prior to the 7 public hearings starting. And you have to wait 8 until the staff has had a chance to review the 9 project a little bit. You can't have it real 10 early because things can change during the 11 review process. so kind of falls in after the 12 staff has done a substantive review but before 13 the public hearings occur. 14 We are asking for -- oh, by the way, this 15 is Cherie' . she's a court reporter. The 16 county has us record these. We used to just 17 record them on a tape recorder. The county's 18 gotten a little more particular about it, and I 19 can understand why. It's a little bit harder 20 for some staff member to have to listen to a 21 crackly old tape recorder and try to understand 22 what's going on. Then they say we' re not going 23 to listen to it anymore, you can listen to 24 them, but want a summary. And we said, hey, 25 this is kind of hard. So Cherie' will record 5 1 the meeting, I'll try to remember to speak 2 slowly and she'll tell me if I don't. And when 3 you ask a question, if you could just say your 4 name and spell it, unless it's Smith. 5 We' re asking for two types of petitions. 6 The first is a GMP or a comprehensive plan 7 amendment. In Florida every city and county 8 has a comprehensive plan, and it's very sort of 9 high level . If you think about it, it's kind 10 of like the Constitution for the united States. • 11 It sets policies and it says where certain 12 types of development should occur and where 13 certain types of development should not occur, 14 where rural lands are, where agricultural lands 15 are. 16 This land is within the urban area, as you 17 can appreciate. You all know where it is, it's 18 just off U.S. 41, East Naples. so the land is 19 designated urban. 20 It does not, though -- and it has zoning 21 on it right now. It's zoned PUD. And that's a 22 planned unit development. And a planned unit 23 development is sort of like a document that 24 sets zoning on a particular piece of land. You 25 could have straight zoning which in the Land 6 1 Development Code provides a list of uses and 2 development standards, or you can develop your 3 own list of uses and your own standards and go 4 to the Board and get it approved through 5 zoning. 6 And that happened years ago. That's where 7 were the name vincentian comes from originally. 8 when this was approved it was owned by the 9 Diocese of venice. And venice, vincentian, 10 that's where the name comes from. There have 11 been several owners since that point in time, 12 at least two, but the name has been retained. 13 The PUD right now allows residential uses 14 and commercial uses. But it's got limitations. 15 obviously the commercial uses, right now the 16 PUD limits it to about eight acres. obviously 17 if you ' re going to build commercial and you' re 18 limited to eight acres on an approximately 30 19 and a half acre site, you' re going to put that 20 along 41. 21 The residential use is limited to four 22 units an acre. And typically under this PUD 23 and typically the way it was years ago when 24 this got approved, you would calculate that 25 density on everything except the commercial . 7 1 so you wouldn't be able to count it as 2 commercial acres. 3 As my client has owned the land over a 4 period of time and looked for opportunities to 5 find either a partner, a joint venture or an 6 individual interested in the land to develop it 7 for either the commercial use or the 8 residential use, it became clear that there 9 were issues with what was allowed in terms of 10 the marketplace. The commercial use sort of 11 drives a different -- kind of a strip pattern 12 of development. It doesn't allow for 13 flexibility of design, doesn't allow for a 14 larger commercial use if somebody was 15 interested in one, doesn't allow for something 16 unique in terms of a mixture of uses, 17 residential and commercial . And because of the 18 cost of the land and the small size, this 19 project does not lend itself and therefore 20 there's been no market for low density 21 development such as single-family. 22 Before --- on 20 acres -- I'll go to 23 questions in just a minute. 24 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Can you 25 repeat that? 8 1 MR. MUL!IERE: Yeah. I said because of the 2 relative small size and you 're talking about in 3 the neighborhood of 80 or 90 dwelling units, 4 this does not lend itself to a single-family 5 development. You don't have enough land to 6 ameni ti ze (sic) it properly and sell it at a 7 market rate. Therefore there's been no buyers. 8 There's been a lot of lookers but no buyers at 9 that low density. 10 Frankly, if there's been any kind of 11 attraction for the property, it's been folks 12 that might want to look at a higher kind of a 13 density such as an affordable housing project 14 or an adult living facility, which wouldn't be 15 affordable but would enjoy a higher number of 16 units. 17 We don't propose to develop it under an 18 affordable housing scenario, getting a density 19 bonus for that As you know, there's already a 20 pretty significant affordable housing 21 development across the street. 22 we would like to see this developed at 23 market rate and we' re willing to commit to that 24 as part of our proposal . 25 so what we' re asking for in the Growth 9 1 Management plan is to allow for up to 360 2 dwelling units on the property and up to 3 2.50,000 square feet of retail commercial , or a 4 mixture of the two. 5 Now, I want you to understand that does 6 not mean that we would be able to do all that 7 commercial plus all that residential . Because 8 we have an overriding cap. And what the county 9 likes to use to limit development, they want -- 10 they understand the need for flexibility in the 11 marketplace. They want to give flexibility. 12 But the way that we're able to -- that 13 they' re able to regulate the degree of 14 intensity, the amount that you can develop, and 15 their concern is traffic. So you do a traffic 16 study and then they limit you to no more than a 17 certain number of trips at peak hour. And I 18 don't know that exact number, but there is a 19 limit. And that limit, whatever mixture we 20 use, if we do some residential , some 21 commerci al , al l commerci al , al 1 residential , 22 however we do it, we can't exceed that trip 23 count, that certain number of trips. 24 In order to have these changes occur, we 25 first have to amend the comprehensive plan. 10 1 And that's a two-step process. The first step 2 is what's called transmittal . We have a 3 hearing date for August 21st for the 4 comprehensive plan for transmittal of this -- 5 for the Planning Commission, before the Collier 6 County Planning Commission, and then the Board 7 would be for October, I believe. 8 Transmittal is -- gives a chance for the 9 Planning Commission and the Board to take a 10 look at what we' re proposing, determine whether 11 they support it, determine if there's any 12 changes that they feel are necessary, and then 13 work with us at that hearing. And if they 14 approve it, they would then transmit it to the 15 State Department of Economic opportunity. Used 16 to be the Department of Community Affairs, but 17 under the current Governor that all got changed 18 a few years ago and now it's Department of 19 Economic opportunity. so they'll transmit it. 20 That's why it's called a transmittal . 21 The state will look at it. If they don't 22 have any objections within 30 days, they don't 23 have to say -- as long as they don't have 24 objections , 30 days go by and we don't hear 25 anything from them, we'll know by the fact that 11 1 they haven't said anything that there are no 2 objections. 3 we can then work on making any changes 4 that the Board discusses during transmittal and 5 then getting final review of the zoning • 6 document, which is the PUD, which will be a 7 companion to the Growth Management Plan 8 Amendment, and those will go together to the 9 adoption hearing. 10 And if we go to the Board in October for • 11 transmittal , we' re probably talking in the 12 range of February for the adoption hearings , 13 which would also be the zoning. You can't 14 rezone the property inconsistent with the 15 comprehensive planning, so we have to go 16 through that process either simultaneous or 17 first. In this case it will be simultaneous. 18 In fact, they'll actually approve or hear the 19 comp. plan on the same agenda, but they'll 20 approve it first and approve the zoning after. 21 Because you have to do it in that order. 22 I'm sure there's a number of things I 23 forgot. Let me just go over the handout rather 24 quickly so that -- you probably haven't had a 25 chance to digest it, and if you look at it and 12 1 have questions. 2 what I've given you is a summary of 3 what -- of the changes that we' re proposing. 4 And we are expressly listing 17 uses in our 5 Growth Management Plan Amendment that will be 6 prohibited uses. So I just want to be clear, 7 because people sometimes miss that word, that 8 this list of 17 uses here will be expressly 9 prohibited in our Growth Management Plan 10 Amendment. 11 And then the next paragraph has some 12 additional restrictions, and I talked to you 13 about those restrictions in terms of the 14 maximum square footage and so on, so forth. 15 so I'm sure you're going to have some 16 questions tonight. And we'll try our best to 17 respond to those questions and listen to any 18 concerns that you may have. 19 I want to go over and just take a minute 20 to go over the PUD master plan with you. But I 21 also want to say that if you do have any 22 questions, you can either call me -- I left my 23 business cards in the car but I'll go get them 24 at the end of the meeting, I'll bring them 25 back -- or you can call Kay at the county or 13 1 corby Schmidt and we'll try to answer any 2 questions that you have. If you got a notice 3 of this, my number is in that too. 4 So this is an aerial . I'm sure some of 5 you had a chance to take a look at it. It 6 shows you where the property is right here. 7 Hitching Post and Trail Acres . 8 This is the PUD master plan. There's a 9 couple of I think important points I want to 10 make. 11 we've strategically located -- the county 12 requires that a developer preserve a certain 13 percent of vegetation on the site; 15 percent 14 is coniiercial , 25 percent is residential or 15 mixed use. we've located that to buffer us 16 from the residential development. The county 17 only requires a 15-foot landscape buffer 18 between these uses, but what we've done is 19 built that up by building our preserve in here. 20 And we've already had the discussions with 21 staff and they' re supportive of the location of 22 the preserve. And I think we've actually had a 23 preserve that's actually gotten jurisdictional 24 permits. 25 This is over a 100-foot width in this 14 1 location. So we' re going to have a much more 2 robust preserve than folks typically have for a 3 50-foot landscape buffer. We still have to 4 provide that landscape buffer, but in addition 5 we'll have the preserve. 6 And on this side next to the Hitching 7 Post, we've located -- there's some preserves 8 in here and then we've located our lake here, 9 so there's a lot of separation pushing these 10 uses closer to southwest Boulevard and Tamiami 11 Trail away from the residential . 12 one more thing, and I'll go right to 13 quest)ons. 14 This right here is the Hitching Post 15 Plaza, so we have commercial right here. 16 okay, I think that's it. I'm open for 17 questions. 18 Yes, ma'am. 19 MS. KELLY: What was on the -- 20 THE COURT REPORTER: May I have your name, 21 please. 22 MR. MULHERE: Wait, what was your name, 23 please? 24 MS. KELLY: I'm sorry. Rosemary Kelly. 25 K-E-L-L-Y. 15 1 How many feet is that tract by the lake? 2 Because it's backing right up. 3 MR. MULHERE: This lake right here? 4 MS. KELLY: Yes. 5 MR. MULHERE: This is approximately -- 6 MS. KELLY: Not there. 7 MR. MULHERE: Hang on. I'm going to give 8 you a perspective. This is -- one inch equals 9 100 feet out here. So this is maybe 120 or 150 10 feet, 130 feet. so if you look at that, you' re 11 at least 200 foot. In this case, I don't know, 12 400 feet. 13 MR. SI-3UCART: Maybe not that the far. 14 MR. MULHERE: well , one, two, three, 300 15 feet. 16 MS. KELLY: You' re misunderstanding the 17 question. 18 MR. MULHLRE: Oh, I'm sorry. 19 MS. KELLY: The question is, I see the 20 Hitching Post. 21 MR. MULHERE: Yes. 22 MS. KELLY: How far from the Hitching Post 23 is the barrier to the lake? 24 MR. MULHERE: You mean where does the lake 25 start? 16 1 MS. KELLY: Thank you. 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, I'm sorry. 3 That's -- well , this is 15. 4 MS. KELLY: Less than 25 feet -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, this is 15 right 6 there, so I'd say 25, 30 feet. 7 MS. KELLY: Do you realize that we're in a 8 flood zone? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. That's actually going 10 to help. 11 MS. KELLY: Help you or help us? 12 MR. MULHERE: No, it's going to help you. 13 MS. KELLY: How's that going to happen? 14 MR. MULHERE: Presently there is no water 15 management on the site. There's no water. 16 MS. KELLY: I know -- 17 MR. MULHERE: So the south Florida water 18 Management District permits the site, has 19 already permitted the site, requires us to 20 retain our water on the site. we can't let 21 that water go off our site and onto your 22 property. we have to design this to retain 23 that water at a minimum of a 25-year storm 24 event. Then you we' re allowed -- (inaudible) 25 just like you guys are -- who knows what 17 1 happened when you guys got done. But -- 2 MS. KELLY: But this is within the flood 3 zone currently. 4 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, everybody's in the 5 flood zone. 6 MS. KELLY: The middle of 41 -- 7 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about the 8 coastal high heard area. 9 Ms. KELLY: Right. 10 MR. MULHERE: But that has to do with 11 hurricane evacuation. It does not include 12 rainfall amounts and flood. That has to do 13 with hurricane evacuation. What we' re talking 14 about -- I thought you were talking about a 15 rain event causing water to rise. 16 Sc this will be designed. It will be 17 better. You will not have any flooding from 18 this property coming onto your property. None. 19 There' s going to be a berm. There will be a 20 berm. You won't have any water. There's no -- 21 ms. KELLY: Did you walk that property? 22 MR. MULHERE: oh, yeah, I've been on the 23 property. 24 MS. KELLY: It's pretty soggy. 25 MR. MULHERE: I know. That's -- trust me, 18 1 you are going to be -- 2 MS. KELLY: I trust you if you want to 3 move that lake over somewhere else. 4 MR. MULHERE: Well , it's 'already permitted 5 in that location. It's already permitted where 6 that jurisdiction is. south Florida Water 7 Management and Corps of Engineers had to review 8 this and they did. 9 Now, you can have -- it won't be square 10 like that. It w111 be -- 11 MS. KELLY: I'm not worried about that 12 side. 13 MR. MULHERE: No, I understand. 14 This lake there helps you. The water's 15 going to go into the lake, it's not going to go 16 across the street. That actually helps you. 17 know it's maybe a little hard to -- 18 MS. KELLY: Yeah, it is, to comprehend. 19 MR. MULHERE: It's true. i don't have a 20 civil engineer here, but I'll put you in touch 21 with him, if you want to talk to him. 22 so any other questions? 23 Must he a couple other questions. 24 MR. WESTERBELT: Steve Westerbelt. 25 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry? 19 1 MR. MULHERE: Westerbelt. 2 MR. WESTERBELT: Westerbelt. 3 MR. MULHERE: W-E-S-T-E-R-B-E-L-D-T. 4 MR. WESTERBELT: No D. But the D is 5 common. 6 The entrances off the southwest Boulevard, 7 the arrows there, there will be mostly like two 8 there, one by 41; is that the idea? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. Yes. 10 MR. WESTERBELT: Or not at that -- 11 MR. MULHERE: Yes, and the reason for that 12 is if -- if some of this is developed as 13 commercial and some of the back is developed as 14 residential , you 'll want to have a separate 15 entrance for the commercial . You wouldn't want 16 people having to come all the way back for the 17 commercial and residential to have separate -- 18 MR. WESTERBELT: okay. And then in the 19 area that' s commercial to commercial where the 20 Hitching Post Plaza is right there, will that 21 be walled off or is it like flow through? 22 MR. MULHERE: It won't be walled off. But 23 there is a requirement for a landscape buffer 24 and there's a requirement to permit -- the 25 water Management permit requires a berm. So 20 1 you' re going to have a berm and a landscape 2 buffer. 3 MR. WESTERBELT: I just wanted to know if 4 the commercial tract will flow through. 5 MR. MULHERE: You know, it's a very good 6 point, and that's a very good suggestion. 7 And the county, I don't know what -- 8 Chris, I'm not sure how that -- what that's 9 like right here. 10 MR. SHUCART: Weil , there's a large pump 11 station -- 12 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, I think there's -- 13 MR. SHUCART: -- in that area. SO you'd 14 have to go -- you'd have to go back around 15 there, sort of, which -- 16 MR. MULHERE: It's a really -- the county 17 usually would like to see that (inaudible) they 18 pop from one commercial location to another. 19 They can walk. 20 MR. WESTERBELT: Right. 21 MR. MULHERE: But it's a good question. 22 think there's utility improvements in the way. 23 MR. WESTERBELT: Pump station. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes, sir. 25 MR. LOVEIT: Vernon Lovett. L-O-V-E-T-T. 21 1 How many acres would Tract L actually be? 2 MR. MULHERE: Oh, I got that right here. 3 Tract L is 4.17. 4 MR. LOVE! I : Okay. On four, on page -- 5 Item 4 on Page 4, it says recreational site for 6 uses adjacent to RV park or mobile home park 7 may be developed on a maximum of three acres. 8 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, that's a good 9 question. 10 MR. LOVEII : okay, show us where that 11 three acres is . 12 MR. MULHERE: First of all , that's a good 13 question. over the years there has been some 14 discussion about maybe -- 15 MR. LOVETT: We live there. 16 MR. MULHERE: You live there, okay, good. 17 so it would he probably in this area right 18 here. 19 MR. LOVEtT: There's a pumping station 20 there. 21 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, on the other side of 22 it, though. You know, we'd have to -- I think 23 you can come around this way. There's the 24 ability to create access. It can't be where 25 the lake is so, you know, we do have lake views 22 1 from that recreation tract. 2 MR. LOVETT: So pumping station will not 3 be relocated. 4 MR. MULHERE: No. 5 MR. LOVEII : So if we were to ever in the • 6 immediate future decide to purchase a little 7 bit of that, would it have frontage on 41? 8 MR. MULHERE: It's conceivable that you • 9 could. I just say that because the state has • 10 to permit that. That's a state road and state 11 permits. 12 MR. LOVLiI : Okay, so the biggest problem 13 with this kind of stuff is -- 14 MR. MULHERE: They'd be concerned about 15 the distance between these two, so you'd 16 probably have to share that access if you 17 wanted to share it. 18 MR. LOVE1F: But we don't have direct 19 access from -- like riding golf carts. Because 20 the pumping station is -- 21 MR. MULHERE: So I see what you' re saying. 22 so somehow when we design it we need to create 23 a reasonable point of ingress and egress 24 between the two properties. 25 MR. LOVEII : we own some property there 23 1 that's used as a maintenance storage there. 2 It's got water tanks. 3 will that be moved? 4 MR. MULHERE: I think we could design 5 it -- look, I'm not telling you that this lake 6 couldn't shift down. The permitting process 7 allows you to make minor modifications. So if 8 we need to get 20, 30 feet, you know, we could 9 do it. But you still have to go through the 10 process . You have to go over there and show 11 them and, you know, do all that kind of stuff. 12 MR. LOVETl : Because I think we envisioned 13 if we did this pump house thing, it would be 14 about where the tract is, there would only be a 15 notch in that property there. 16 MR. MULHERE: Here? 17 MS. KELLY: Up above. 18 MR. LOVLTT: A little bit -- yeah. 19 MR. MULHERE: Well , I mean, we can cross 20 that bridge when we come to it. I mean, it's • 21 not impossible to modify the permit and change 22 the configuration. I mean, it's not an act of 23 God. We can do it, it's just everything takes 24 time and money. • 25 MR. LOVEII : Can you give us a time 24 1 schedule that you think is reasonable for this 2 project to start developing? 3 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. since we don't really 4 have an end user at this point and, as I said, 5 that's part of the reason for going through 6 this process. It's an expensive process and 7 time consuming, so I just want everybody to 8 appreciate that it's costing a lot of money to 9 go through this. Nobody would do it if they 10 didn't feel like they have to. It's sort of 11 like having your fingernails pulled out. 12 But having said that, I mean, I would 13 defer to you, Chris. would you like to 14 hopefully within a couple of years have -- two 15 years? Because it's going to take us another 16 six or seven months to get through the -- 17 MR. LOVLTT: The point of my question is 18 for us to lobby our board we have to have some 19 kind of time frame. 20 MR. MULHERE: We got it, we got it. I 21 would say two years minimum. 22 unless -- you know, the market's so crazy 23 out there right now. I mean, the demand is 24 very, very high. But it's all over the place. 25 MR. LOVEtT: So you share our recreational • 25 1 facilities? 2 MR. MULHERE: Right. 3 MR. LOVE-T: And we' re in a position to 4 where that's uncertain -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Right. 6 MR. LOVE T: -- as you what's going to 7 happen there for us. we would like to have -- 8 MR. MULHERE: You might not even need -- 9 you might need an acre and a half. 10 MR. LOVE7T: It's a question about how 11 much money we want to borrow and whether our 12 300 people would vote for it. So we've got a 13 few -- 14 MR. MULHERE: well , we put it in there, so 15 you guys let us know. 16 Mrs. Kelly? 17 MS. KELLY: Thank you. what would be the 18 time frame if we were to entertain something 19 like that? would we he able to keep it 20 undeveloped or does it have to be totally 21 developed? Say you negotiate with Chris for a 22 piece of land in the future. 23 MR. MULHERE: No, you could buy the land. 24 You don't have to develop it. 25 MS. KELLY: Even though it's developing 26 1 all around us? 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, the use is permitted. 3 MR. SHUCI\RT: Yeah, there would be some 4 coordination between the stormwater -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. But, I mean, you 6 don't have to develop it right away. 7 MS. KELLY: Just sit on it? 8 MR. MULHERE: I 'm just saying, you have to 9 raise the money. You don't have to develop it. 10 This -- you could take a look at it, find 11 out what' s the elevation. 12 Any other questions? 13 Yes, sir. 14 MR. GRIMES: Joe Grimes. 15 I notice that -- 16 THE COURT REPORTER: Okay, I'm sorry, I'm 17 just not hearing him. 18 MR. GRIMES: (Inaudible.) 19 And then you turn it back and it says 20 service stations and fuel . So which is it? 21 MR. MULHERE: well , fuel dealers, if you 22 look at the SIC Code, that's something 23 different than service stations. Fuel dealers 24 is a larger industrial kind of fuel dealer. 25 You wouldn't know that from looking at that, 27 1 but it's based on that SIC Code, that number 2 that's after it, 5983 to 5989. 3 Although that sounds like it might be a 4 service station, it's not. One service station 5 is permitted, or we' re requesting to have one 6 service station permitted. And service 7 stations are permitted right now. 8 MR. GRIMES: Is that with fuel? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yes . Gas station. 10 MR. GRIMES: It's a direct opposite of 11 what this says (inaudible) . 12 MR. MULHERE: No, it's not the opposite, 13 because the prohibited use is not -- where it 14 says fuel dealer, that's not a gas station. 15 That is an industrial -- 16 MR. GRIMES: jowl? 17 MR. MULHERE: Pardon? 18 MR. GRIMES: Jowl (phonetic) . 19 MR. MULHERE: See, it's like a big -- like 20 Evans Oil . 21 MR. GRIMES: All right, I understand. 22 mR. MULHERE: So that's what that refers 23 to. But' one gas station. 24 MR. GRIMES: I have another question. 25 MR. MULHERE: Yes. 28 1 MR. GRIMES: when I read through this, 2 somehow it was just kind of like listening to 3 the news when we hear somebody speaking in the 4 congress. And what all does mixed use -- could 5 the whole thing be commercial? 6 MR. MULHERE: That's a good question. 7 Yeah, it could. The flexibility, the way 8 we wrote it, we put the maximum flexibility, is 9 it could either be all residential , all 10 commercial or a mixture of both. 11 A few years ago East Naples Civic 12 Association was looking at the corridor and 13 doing some design work and they had a plan 14 developed, never got adopted, didn't go 15 anywhere, just was done. 16 This particular piece, because of its -- 17 there's a lot of small -- there's a lot of 18 10,000 square foot parcels and 20,000 square 19 foot C-3, C-4 parcels. This is 30 acres. And 20 it's not 30 acres of developable land, but it's 21 still 20 or 22 acres of developable land. 22 That he' s makes it unique. Plus it's at 23 the intersection here. 24 so the East Naples Civic Association 25 identified this, they called it Navaho Trail 29 1 mixed use node or commercial node. 2 Now, as I said, it doesn't have any weight 3 in the government. It was just them planning. 4 They were just looking to try to make things 5 better at East Naples. 6 A lot of new things have happened now. 7 Now with all the development that's occurring 8 you' re going to see a lot of interest in hiring 9 opportunities. That's whys we want the 10 flexibility. we don't really know right now 11 exactly which way the market's going. One 12 thing we know, we know the Commissioner in the 13 district and other folks, there's a concern 14 that East Naples has enough affordable housing. 15 And we' re not asking for that. 16 we' re even willing to restrict our 17 residential use to a marked degree so we can 18 give people a sense of comfort that we' re not 19 asking for that. 20 MR. GRIMES: I think this is the third 21 meeti ng I went to on that property. Nothing 22 happens . That's the way it's been It was 23 commercial and then assisted living. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, it was assisted 25 living. That's how -- 30 1 (inaudible. Two people speaking at once.) 2 MR. GRIMES: -- because I had to cut my 3 melaleuca trees and they didn't. You know what 4 I mean? 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, yeah. 6 MR. GRIMES: But I just was concerned 7 about whether it could be full commercial or 8 not on that --- 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, there's a lot of the 10 exotics on that piece there. That will be 11 cleaned up. 12 MR. GRIMES: I know, but that was just a 13 joke. 14 MR. MULHERE: were you developing the 15 property? 16 MR. GRIMES: pardon? 17 MR. MULHERE: Were you developing it? 18 MR. GRIMES: No, I owned property. 19 MR. MULHERE: And they made you go and 20 clear the exotics? 21 MR. GRIMES: They wouldn't let me cut down 22 all those trees. I had to cut down only the 23 exotics . 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes. By hand. 25 MR. GRIMES: And every time a limb fell on 31 1 the ground I had a code enforcement violation. 2 And it went on for a long time. 3 MR. MULHERE: It isn't easy. 4 MR. GRIMES: No, no, it's not. 5 MR. MULHERE: Yes? 6 MS. KELLY: If you develop this as 7 residential , would say you describe what you 8 would put in there? 9 MR. MULHERE: It would he multi-family, 10 marketing multi-family or townhomes. Maybe 11 townhomes. Depends on, you know, what the -- 12 MS. KELLY: How many stories high? 13 MR. MULHERE: Right now I think we can go 14 50 feet. 15 MS. KELLY: And if it's assisted living? 16 MR. MULHERE: Assisted living is a little 17 bit higher. 18 MR. S[IIJE \RT: I think they' re all the 19 same. 20 MS. KELLY: What about hotel? 21 MR. MULHERE: You know what, I don't -- 22 how many units? 23 MS. KELLY: No, how high. 24 MR. MULHERE: How high. Let me look, 25 because I don' t want to answer something that 32 1 isn't accurate. gust give me a second, I have • 2 that document here. I have it here. 3 okay, building height. Here we are. It's 4 50 feet. 5 MS. KELLY: Fifty feet. so it's all about 6 the sane. 7 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. I just wanted to make 8 sure I didn't misspeak. 9 MS. KELLY: And where would that -- 10 MR. MULHERE: Well , they' re not going to 11 want to be invisible, so -- 12 Ms. KELLY: That would probably face 41. 13 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, if a hotel went there, 14 they would wont exposure. And, you know, 15 that's kind of why I said we knew that if there 16 was going to he any concerns it would come from 17 folks living close by. That's why the design 18 was to create a good separation. 19 MS. KELLY: Well , we can swim over and 20 meet you every now and then, 21 MR. MULHERE: Rut you'll have a landscape 22 buffer here too, and we'll make sure it's 23 substantial . 24 MS. KELLY: I'll be over there watching. 25 MR. MULHERE: That's good. You keep us 33 1 honest. 2 You had a question? 3 MR. WEST: Cary West. 4 You say that you 'd be willing to restrict 5 affordable housing. At what point in this 6 process will that come into play where that 7 actually goes on paper? 8 MR. MULHERE: Good question. 9 MR. WEST: Are we someplace where we need 10 to voice our concerns that we don't want to see 11 more of that, or is this way ahead of the game? 12 MR. MULHERE: No, you' re not ahead of it. 13 This hearing that's coming up is when we intent 14 to introduce that. So that's the 21st of 15 August. We' re going to put the language in the 16 comprehensive P1 an Amendment. 17 MS. KELLY: Is that an open meeting? 18 MR. MULHERE: Yes . And you should -- if 19 you' re within 500 feet, you'll all get noticed. 20 And you'll see some signs on the property and 21 there'll he an ad in the paper. 22 MR. ZENZ: That's it, 500 feet? That's 23 all you' re -- 24 MR. MULHERE: 500 feet of the boundary. 25 So anybody that's within 500 feet of this -- 34 1 it's larger in the rural area, it's 1,000 feet 2 in the rural area because, you know, lower 3 density involved. well , that's why they do 4 signs and the newspaper ad too. 5 Yes, sir? 6 MR. HENDERS: Terry Henders , Trail Acres. 7 would our access (phonetic) be the preserve 8 and/or lake or would it be restricted to people 9 in the development? 10 MR. MUI_HERE: That's going to be a 11 storm water lake so, I mean, I wouldn't eat 12 anything caught in it. You can catch it and 13 throw it hack. 14 And as far as the preserve goes, if it's 15 developed as residential , perhaps a developer 16 would want to try to use some of it as an 17 amenity and they would put in some boardwalks. 18 But most of the time with something of that 19 size, that's not the case and it's just 20 separate. They put some signs up, this is a 21 preserve. Because the agencies are very 22 particular and sensitive about having it get 23 degraded by people using it. 24 A lager preserve, somebody would spend 25 the money to do it because they consider it to 35 1 be an amenity itself, the project. So I'm not 2 saying somebody couldn't do a multi-family 3 project and put a little thing down to the 4 lake. I mean, that could happen. That could 5 happen. 6 Yes. 7 UNIDE 1IFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Chris is 8 the owner of the property or is he the -- 9 MR. MULHERE: Chris is the owner. 10 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, I'm one of the owners. • 11 MR. WESTGATE: Are you willing -- are you • 12 partnering with a developer? Have you thought 13 about developing it yourself, or what are your 14 visions ---- what are your visions for the 15 property? 16 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, our visions are as of 17 right now we don't have a lot of concrete 18 definitive p1 ans . We want to first get through 19 the entitlement process and understand what we 20 have as far as a way of development. We are 21 looking at some joint venture commercial 22 developments. We' re looking at a number of 23 different multi-family developments. We may 24 end up selling the site. So there's a 25 possibility of that as well too. So at this 36 1 point I can't really give you a great answer. 2 we' re looking at a lot of different avenues. 3 MR. wEsTGATE: Are you a current developer 4 in the East Naples area? 5 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, we actually own the 6 shopping center right next door to the 7 property. 8 UNIDENI IFiED AUDIENCE MEMBER: 9 MR. ,,,'r_STGATE: so you have a vested 10 interest in East Naples. 11 MR. SEHUCART: we have a vested interest 12 not only in East Naples but in this particular 13 corridor. The better this particular property 14 is developed, the better it's going to enhance 15 our property next door as well . 16 We also have an interest in Port of the 17 islands Marina, which I still consider East 18 Naples, but -- so the heater East Naples is, 19 the better even tort of the Islands will be 20 affected by it. 21 MR. wESTGATE: So you can understand the 22 concerns or the -- I don't know where you live, 23 but you can understand or share the same 24 concerns as possibly the people that live 25 within this imliediate area of the -- whatever 37 1 is going to be developed on the piece of 2 property. And the limits to traffic, the type 3 of housing or type of commercial . 4 And had you ever envisioned building or 5 selling it to a developer that would build a 6 multi-family, (ow-income housing facility or 7 deal with somebody such as Habitat and develop 8 it --_. have Habi tat develop it into what they --- 9 MR. SHUCART: Absolutely not. I don't 10 think that's really the -- I don't think that's 11 the highest and best use for this particular • 12 site. As `yob had menti oned, we' re going to 13 write into the documents that there is market 14 rate housing not to allow an affordable housing 15 component. we don't want to see it, we don't 16 think that that's really the best use for this 17 site. There's better opportunities for it than 18 to have that. 19 MH. )2,117S ATE: rt may be the most 20 profitable for the investor. 21 MR. SHUCARF: It's not going to be. 22 Affordable housing doesn't always mean 23 profitable. And with the market the way it is 24 right I think there's more profitable ways 25 to go other than affordable housing. 38 1 MR. MULHERE: And there's ample -- I mean, 2 you've heard the argument made, but -- and 3 there hasn't been a recent study done. I don't 4 know w eh the last time there was a study done 5 related to the amount of affordable housing. A 6 few years ago there was one, and it was pretty 7 substantial amount of available affordable 8 housing, in particular in East Naples. 9 So, you know, I don't -- it's tough to get • 10 through the process in Collier County. Just in 11 case anybody doesn't know, there's five 12 Commissioners , and in collier county to get a 13 Comprehensive Plan Amendment approved for a • 14 rezone, you need four. 15 MR. . 1-e,/,E E: Once it's approved a 16 rezone ---- 17 MR. MULHERE: It' s called a supermajority. • • 18 MR. W-ESIGAT-E: But once it's approved and 19 rezoned , part of that rezoning would allow for, • 20 you know 3±;0-- 21 MR. MULHERE: well , that's why we' re 22 putting language in. 23 MR. SHUGART: That's why we' re going to 24 write the language in market rate. 25 MR. ' 51�, ;t =: Yeah, I'm not real 39 1 comfortable with that I'd have to -- 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, hut that's -- 3 MR. ESTGA T-E: what's market rate? I 4 mean, the market is -- I mean, an affordable 5 home sells for $140,000. Is that market rate? 6 MR. MULHERE: We can define -- it is 7 defined what' s affordable. It' s defined by the 8 amount of your income, you know, that you have 9 to -- that you can afford to spend on housing. 10 And I don't have the exact formula. 11 MR. SHUGART: You get government subsidies 12 with th -,, affordable housing. I mean, that's 13 part of why people do affordable housing, 14 because of the tax incentives associated with 15 it. And that's the element that brings in the 16 ability to offer low rent, because you get 17 government subsidy on a tax basis. 18 MR. MULHERL: I mean, we understand that 19 concern , and we want to -- 20 MR. was ATE: I mean, it's a pretty 21 busy -- it' s a pretty busy intersection 22 already. so to add, you know, the density such 23 as that many units , I just don't see that it 24 could handle that much. 25 MR. MUL ; RE: VJJe've been through the 40 1 traffic analysis and we' re okay with the cap 2 that they out It. It may be fewer units and 3 more core or rc i al , it may be all commercial . But 4 there's a cap and it's the number of trips. 5 And they've cone the analysis, the county's 6 done the analysis. That's how they arrived at 7 it, that this is what the capacity is, you can 8 only have this number of trips. 9 MR. S§-UCART: And also, if there's 10 additional improvements provements needed at that 11 intersection, there's certain triggers that 12 require improvements to that intersection 13 there. The signal 's already there, which has 14 made a h-ip difference. And so if an extra turn 15 lane needs to be added, that has to be our 16 cost. If an extra inbound lane needs to be 17 added, that would be at our cost. And it would 18 have to - you know, there's additional studies 19 that would have to be done in order to 20 deterr i i ne. if the intersection's going to 21 function properly. 22 MR. MULHEE?E: Which you do at -- 23 MR. WES GATE: z hope you share the same 24 value o i' ti's:_ homeowners in the area of not 25 putting another whistler's Cove on the corner 41 1 of Southwest Boulevard. 2 MR. SNUCART: I 100 percent appreciate ,• 3 that. tnd the local commissioner is adamantly 4 opposed to anything like that. so if you have some other suggestions, 6 I'll defer to Bob and our attorney as far as 7 coming up with some better language to further 8 solidify that concept. I'm open to 9 suggestions . 10 MR. T7LSTC,Pd-E: when Donna Fiala comes back 11 in September from her vacation, we have a 12 meeting set up with some of the other neighbors 13 and myself about how that's going to be and 14 what's going on with that. 15 MR. MULHERE: That's good. Great. 16 UNIDENIIFTED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Because she 17 said that stuff to us before when we had -- 18 (Inaudible. Telephone interruption.) They say 19 things and they go along with the developers. 20 MR. SHUCART: we' re open to figuring out a 21 way to bridge that gap as far as writing it in. 22 I'm not sure there's been other developers 23 that's actually written it in before but -- 24 MR. MULHERE: No, that's never happened. 25 mR. SHUCART: -- but Bob can speak to 42 1 that. 2 MR. ‘.,,,L1HiL: Because we fought against 3 having Habitat buying out properties and 4 developing a Habitat. 5 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about in the 6 Manor? 7 MR. S!-:UrLART: No, they were purchasing 8 some trailers . 9 MR. WLSTGAIE: some? No, a lot. In Trail 10 Acres. They destroyed First and Second Street. 11 MR. MULHERE: i didn 't know that. 12 MR. WESATE: There's just no stopping 13 them. Yar rhow what. I mean? 14 MR. There isn't. Because in 15 that siLuation there's no legal way. They have 16 the right to go buy them. I think we have to 17 have do this :co at the zoning stage. And we 18 may need -- we may need some guidance in 19 terms oi the language. But we' re committing to 20 you that we ' re going to put that in there and 21 we'll figure out the right way to get it in 22 there. 23 MR. `_,H!.!7ART: Because we believe in the 24 same conceL. I mean, that's not what's going 25 to benefit tne area and it's not going to 43 1 benefit the p, uperty next door and it's really 2 not what's needed in the area. we've got -- 3 you know, EaSt Naples finally has some great 4 momentum going again. And it's nice to see the 5 things that are going on in the neighborhood. 6 The Fresh Market and the outbacks and all of 7 those things uomi ng about. 8 MR. WES'yTE: There's other, you know, 9 property. ihe dated conmuni ti es are kind of 10 protected w-:1- kin their gated community as far 11 as home value_ But if you' re not living in a 12 gated comiun y, you really don't have 13 protection -- 14 __ r��'�. r�i��'�!_ =R.� You don't, but 15 MR. WES .A.,E: ---- as far as value. So -- 16 MR. M!Ui gRE: A rise in tide, you know, 17 floats all knts . What happens is that over 18 time the market values will increase as East 19 Naple atdres and you get a lot of this really 20 nice hots i n :;ei ? i ng. And even then the 21 non-gated cc.::,r;ni ti es, you' re going to see 22 market value go up. And there's no better 23 way --- 24 MR. wat I tTE: But they always find a way. 25 They al:JEa,,s :Hal a way. 44 . , 1 MR. MULHERE: well , right now they can do 2 it because -ft you go in and ask for an 3 affordable hca.!sing density bonus, the land 4 costs have gaten so high that they only way 5 you can do larat, you can afford to do that, is 6 if you' re saHsidized. If he had: Man. I 7 didn't know aaything about that, which is very 8 hard tort as 9 UNIDENTED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Across the 10 road there -- 11 THE COnT REPORTER: I 'm sorry, I didn't 12 hear what vc: said. 13 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: But we 14 don 't want_ , , J.:_hing more like that. 15 MR. MU I understand that. 16 mR. v,117,7ATE: Yeah, that was actually -- 17 that was no .-.!.Tposed to happen. And it did. 18 MR. ZELN/: Because Fiala pushed it. She 19 pushed it. - hat was when they wanted 20 affordable Hasing. That's been going on for 21 years . Itaya..' s what I'm saying, you said she 22 says no. sH does. 23 MR. Mat!ERE: She does to us when we go 24 see her. pretty clear. Maybe she • 25 changed her HHA. 45 1 MR. ZE-t1: You have Habitat. venetian 2 Falls , vhi s ight next to the Hitching 3 Post. 4 MR. where is the venetian Falls? 5 MR. ZENZ: Right next to Hitching Post on 6 41. 7 MR. MU_LERE: I think it's down a ways. 8 MR. ZE. 7: its right next to the radio 9 station. LEL ;— a ways. I think its called 10 Venetian. thing. They put that through. 11 And then tbo again, they gave the bonus of 12 letting more sop-le be on that -- those are the 13 smallest lots . whispering Cove is the same 14 way, they s that in. 15 M. 1,1;JLH:RE: Chance Estates? It's a 16 Habitat pro-,j,?,ct. 17 MR. -/=: Like I said, it's right where 18 you go past 1.r.h Hitching Post on that big empty 19 lot tftz,L's sahL • 20 ms. No, RaceTrac is coming there. 21 RaceTrac cjal-ine station. 22 MR. =7: No, I: know. Once you go past 23 that, your: going more south towards 951. 24 There' s a a big Habitat -- 25 MR. 7).E: so, you know, again, we 46 1 understand -Lat. we' re willing to put the 2 conditions in t'ilre to the best of our ability. 3 we' ll work /vH, you and keep you posted. 4 You can co rate with us as we move forward. 5 It's a pub Hting on the 21st. You should 6 show up an: flress your concerns if you have 7 them, you H .:Ith respect to that issue, you 8 know. 9 MR. VIBBB Thanks , Chris; well be in 10 touch with th ::. 11 MR. MOO HOE: I do want to see if there's 12 any other g=tii)ns before we close. 13 MR. LC'./E:1 : On 59, correctional 14 institutic ;23 . Does that keep somebody 15 from Hi acility that helps felons get 16 back on tjrir 17 UNIDErITHTBB AUDIENCE MEMBER: Halfway 18 houses? 19 MP_ ml_n=: You ' re talking about 20 something I . Matthews House? 21 MR. B.C.:BI-J1.: Yes. • 22 MR. MBLILBF_: Homeless shelters and soup 23 kitchens are !HLohibited. 24 MR. LBVBI - : But that's -- it's not one of 25 those rain that the idea is -- 47 1 MS. KELLY: this is prohibited. 2 MR. LOVE : That's what I'm saying. Does 3 it prohibit? 4 MR. M ULH -_. .E: :[: would say it does. You' re 5 talking abou L rehabilitation facility. 6 Mrs. i__OVEF : That's not a place for 7 felons . 8 MR. MULHH You' re talking about 9 rehabi i i tali c. . 10 -: Rehabilitation. 11 N'.fl_};HH I don't know if there's 12 anything that ?2ci f-i cal l y works for felons. 13 But this --- 14 mR. ROVE. ,-: It was just a question. 15 MR. MUM Yeah, no problem. 16 Any other _ ,Jesti ens? 17 ( aresp 18 MR. YULHH okay, I'm going to run out 19 to my car .:roc_ ;o: some cards. I'll bring them 20 back in so th if somebody has a question, 21 they can call me. sorry, I should have brought 22 them in with but I -- 23 MS. ^OITE-_: I have a question. 24 t I`'�Ilnn MI �. i�'IJ Li T Yes. 25 MS. Ts it legal for you to put in • • 48 • • 1 there that you can't sell to -- 2 MR. MULHEPE: very good question. 3 MS. And are you then by doing that • • 4 setting LI on oF- those crazy lawsuits that -- 5 MR. MSLFt No, your question is very, 6 very good. gpn't know the answer to that. 7 repeat .auestion for these guys. • 8 Rich ne got to get you in on this . • 9 The questicn is it legal to put in some 10 language that ' :old restrict the market that we • 11 would sell thiL,, tio. And I said I'm not sure 12 that we know t1;: answer to that. Its never 13 been done 'pefc,, e we think maybe we can do it. 14 Depending en 0 anguage we use we can do it. 15 But I' M ::cause It isn't up to me. 16 know I like to Hay an attorney, but I'm not • 17 one, so -- • 18 MR. YOVAHVICH: our intent is to work 19 Mth the Coon - Attorney and craft appropriate 20 language to .,-,1sune that we deliver to you 21 everything we'v,J, camitted to delivering to 22 you , which is iYs going to be a mark rate -- 23 would telling his gentleman, luxury. If it's • 24 a reRLZ] it would be a luxury 25 rental . It 1:. H not be wfilstler's Cove. I 49 1 forget when went through, but I think it 2 may have been hn.rore Donna became the 3 commission?t—: :hat area. And I think it was 4 when =John Nor was . I won't swear to it but 5 I thi nk it wai 6 But to remember, there were 7 different ti ma 'Jack then regardi ng -- but 8 anyv.ay, wh I st s Cove was a project that 9 was -- did Hderai subsidies to buy the 10 property'. exchange for that they had to 11 agree to cert 2 restrictions on affordability. • 12 I believe it as a 30-year commitment, 13 whistler's Cc. I may be off a few years, but 14 I think it H 10-year commitment. 15 Sc goal is to be direct and put 16 right -in the H a that we will do -- we are not 17 doing any affi-.H-able housing and we are doing a • 18 1 uxury rental : multiteniiiy type project. 19 whether the c 221y Attorney is going to let me 20 get am-7 that direct, I don't know, 21 we may have .t i:ssage it a little bit to make 22 sure that dkay legally, but we will get 23 there. 24 MR. ZEr'_!"'_: $ut if you change the zoning 25 and then the decides I don't want the 50 1 property any„ -I'm going to sell it. So the 2 next person c. .0 ; in and says oh, well the 3 zonings c_han , _ and i can put 360 rental 4 residents anC s already done and over with. 5 MR. YOVi\ couple things you have to 6 factor in . n:'. your homework. One, you 7 have to -f ac: land price, that goes in a 8 prorated cos hen you have to build it, so 9 you have to 1 . ine your construction cost. By 10 the tiLL,t you are all that in, you have to 11 make a profi t o the rents . At some point I 12 think the may. . > going to show you that it's 13 not going to ., . an affordable housing project. 14 Because ;en throw all of those costs in, 15 and you a nt :rake a profit, you ' re not going 16 to be able t It to people who qualify for 17 low--income H :ho:: 1 ,1g. 18 But I just want to also -- I 19 mean, -i f we r_ - condition on i n there, it runs 20 with thu zeni r . You can sell the land, but 21 you' re st=ill eut to the same conditions. 22 It does not c :• y if it's sold. It runs with 23 the land . d w .y we' re suggesting you put 24 it in zc i c.r c .. se you can't get around 25 that. Van -- you can go in and 51 1 rezone it iy , .: want-, but then we'll have 2 another inFoi . Lon meeting and then -- yes? 3 M. Sc' , - iF 1 (-an, Bob had mentioned 4 earlier as .,,,,' , , -hat language about the kind of 5 housing they :, oiose might even appear in the = 6 Comprehensiy, 1 ,n itself. And that's just 7 another level F protection you would have. 8 M. rc,U1 : L : True, it would be harder to 9 change thilt. c '7 good t.-ioint. 10 mz. sc:: :..: , ,-: lre'ye got two layers of 11 protection t _ ,ould end up controlling the 12 property. 13 ivIlz. LhaL ahout the difference 14 between -- y. , cow, Lhere's a difference 15 between a ram . develep:iient and a -- 16 M . mut . . r.--.: Tee simple owned. That you 17 cannot reguij._ . Mau is a form of ownership. 18 zoning has 1., ' : so :o do it whether it's a 19 rental a:::-IruL - ,c or a ft''_ simple owned. The 20 way to r -L , Lo flake -iL market rate. 21 MS. '.°IAC . : r,ilody l!Pagner. 22 i guess 1 aunt clarification. The way 23 its zoned rig u_ nco, y:1TJ' re saying four units 24 per acre. 25 ,E, i'.', . . .: r: Cornet. 52 1 MS. just did the math, and with 2 only 22 acres, 'chat means 16 plus eight units 3. per acre ncm. 4 MR. ,'JULHEL=1.: It' s actually based on the 5 total aa 'ou go yilth the 30, not the 22 . 6 ms. : T. see. 7 MR. MULHL: L: It' s based on the total . 8 It's actadil i . its 12, it's 11.7, 9 think. 10 ms. And I guess -- you said 50 11 feet. How ma:n: stnHes is that 50? 12 mR. MU:11PE: roJr. Four. In today's -- 13 under tcen7n gh ceiling market. Four 14 stories, thee OF four. Some people don't 15 build fGui: only Hi-Id three. 16 Hints still a huge building. 17 MR. MUIJi[. 'Afell , the setback, there's • 18 further seti . P,es-ides the buffer, there's a 19 setback argir aunt too, and that's based -- 20 the setH7Fk 5ased on the height of 21 the huildM(.?. 22 MR. YovAr VICH: I think something you 23 really base tc 'Factor M. The existing zoning, 24 the fronL o1 I tfT.:'.t: fronts commercial , it's 25 already milci±1 for that. And the 53 1 back is Lasia residential type of use. 2 That zoniilg re , : ly h .11:trings the ability to 3 develop a qua ! : -7 no eat: on this property 4 because -Arre oirg to have strip retail up 5 front pet a long narrow piece. 6 And you 'o cjc, a relatively low 7 density pcojee. that vu can't amenitize. So 8 you' re : )L ( 04. the high-end 9 resident : -.1 0:1 property on a small 10 little p nan I. , t pa can' t: provide any 11 am2nitly- to I as zoning. 12 so 7no. tHIs is ing to give the 13 developormo a tHHt7lity to provide a 14 p, He-t ftat can have appropriate 15 ameniti ; thaad 11 i i =ease market values 16 around pr :, or : :.oHle appropriate commercial 17 that ciii inc! se tPn property values over 18 what Hilt on the property. 19 it' , a Lc , , 1 pic.:_e of property to develop 20 with cia, 21 ms. JAi cci if you' re familiar with 22 Mercado - - 23 MP VOA' - 'm very familiar. 24 MS. :eu 've got mixed use. And 25 you've . ' ,, y've got commercial on 54 1 the firs iLys and t:n: n you've got one or two 2 layers of high-ehd residential . 3 MR. MNIU, CD ome of the buildings. 4 MR. YCMAHIC:A: and if you' re familiar 5 with the cen (, ad yun ' re familiar with Bay 6 Front, they can't keep quality 7 Counerc-ial a there. hey -- I'm telling you, 8 I mean, repnasent Lam, okay. So I know it's 9 been a s-'-rn -le to neL that retail space 10 leased . :,old the units quick, but the 11 retail -; s 12 MR. KuLlirrE: its taken Mercado a long 13 time to . 14 MR. YCV,Y The exact opposite 15 happenes a ,crado. They filled up -- 16 commercial . 17 MR. '!CV,'', OvAICH: -- the commercial . But 18 the resnLiii ;s teach co sale. I mean, 19 mixed use is reHly :,cc making it in Naples. 20 MP. H5 11: allow it. We allow 21 it. An pc's the right mix of uses, 22 somethin Iike -that cc'.J1c- happen. 23 My Hess is it ±:cHci probably be more like 24 commercial in a sepa .ate multi-family building. 25 Not nec's a y In vs same building, but same 55 1 campus. 2 N;R. s i 1 r to Naples Square 3 dotivnto- 'v 0-acre piece. 4 Three-q�H tcrs or the rear is going to be 5 resi do rr ' .he:, _. e commercial will front 6 on 41. °:; c, r,. iclered a quote, unquote 7 mixed us), . c 1 "s t the residential over 8 the cor: o: c_(1 . 9 z you as Rich said, it's not 10 really i-,,Li ty anywhere in town. 11 Even en H 'S struggled. You know, 12 to live cc. r ::1 is a younger type of 13 menta l i' 1. „ t ' c ' 1 `- got to have a certain 14 number c: Hys.orne to IVe in that area and it 15 just --- e .:1 polar opposites. 16 sc, _ it as , . 'e residential in the 17 rear MC -e H_ _ cx i iierci al frontage type 18 in the i f ; t s that direction. 19 ms. ir: !t-R: i= is the acreage of the 20 colne r - Hahle according to right 21 now? 22 M,;. '. tt now? 23 MR. n under 10 or right at 24 nine- 25 MR. , eight or nine acres. 56 1 ms. Ah:: this would increase that. 2 MR. t*SERE: ILs would allow you to do 3 all come. -- sidential or a mixture of 4 both. 5 MR. right now there's 6 115,000 fceL commercial on the nine 7 acres. . ,rcoi-ll,c wise there'll be -- if 8 the ent ic is ' 'eloped as commercial , it 9 would be - 10 ' J " !7F-T- 0 es intense. Because we're 11 capped e. 210. so r : ,ht now it allows 115 on 12 nine aci If we o it all commercial at 13 250, I 'd he ce 22 acres. So it's a less 14 intensiti, 15 really it would be 30 16 acres . 17 so. h, hopefully. 18 An: want to kind of wrap 19 it up, to make sure I answer 20 any of !nlest:i , so any last questions? 21 (1 22 : !ILRE: I ly appreciate your 23 coming. sure ve going to think of some 24 more -,oing to run out to the 25 car an(' car.:: If you want to call me, 57 1 you can , ane peopTh don't 11 1<e to ask 2 questic:Is in a g',-c!T. 3 (At '2hich time, his meeting concluded at 4 6:30 p.m.') 5 6 • 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 • 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 • 23 24 25 58 1 2 3 CEP.TIFICATE OF REPORTER • 4 State of Florida ) 5 County of Cal her ) 6 7 I, CHEMEI NOITINGHAM, Notary Public, in 8 and for the State of Florida at Large, certify that 9 was authorized t-.o and did stenographically report the 10 foregoing proceedings . 11 12 I further certify that I am not a relative, 13 employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties, 14 nor am I financially Interested in the action. 15 16 Dated this 21st day of July, 2014. 17 18 19 CHERIE' R. NOliiNGHAM Gregory Court Reporting 20 2650 Airport Road South Naples, Florida 34112 21 my Commission No. FF 131691 Expires: July 12, 2018 22 23 24 25 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULATION PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Kay Deselem,AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: February 25,2015 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review of the Proposed Vincentian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development(5th memo) PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL20130001726 [REV:5] PETITION NAME: Vincentian Village PUD Rezone REQUEST: To rezone the ±30.7 acre site from the Vincentian Planned Unit Development (PUD), to the Vincentian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow mixed use development - up to 224 multi-family dwelling units; up to 250,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses; up to 150 hotel rooms; and, an assisted living facility. LOCATION: The subject property is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban - Mixed Use I;. District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and addressed in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). This petition relies on recently transmitted [final adoption hearing anticipated to be on or about April 28, 2015] amendments of provisions in the FLUE to achieve consistency. That amendment [ref. CP-2013- 10/PL20130001767] establishes the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District for: up to 7.3 DU/acre for 224 residential dwelling units;and, up to 250,000 square feet of gross floor area for uses allowed in the C-3, Commercial General zoning district by right and by conditional use, dental labs, skilled nursing facilities, department stores, a hotel of 150 units maximum, and, a recreational site for use by residents in the adjacent mobile home development. The provisions of the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict proposed in the companion GMP amendment are listed below,followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. • Main Subdistrict provisions state "The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses." [Provisions for this aspect of the PUD are found in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Tract MU - Mixed-Use Development, Principal Uses,subsection LA.,and are consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] -1 - I • Subdistrict section a. provides that "The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land • Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally, the following uses are allowed: Department store (5311), Hotel (7011, hotel only), Dental laboratories (8072), and Nursing and personal care facilities (8051)". [Provisions for allowable commercial land uses are found in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Tract MU — Mixed-Use Development, Principal Uses, subsection Y.B. and Accessory I Uses, subsection II.B. All of the principal uses listed in the PUD are listed as either permitted [principal] or conditional uses in the C-3 zoning district, or are the four additional uses allowed by the Subdistrict. The Subdistrict generally does not address accessory uses, except as noted further below regarding fuel pumps.] F • Subdistrict subsection b.1. provides that"Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square ) feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an € assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum i allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet". [Provisions for commercial land use restrictions and intensity standards are found in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Tract MU — Mixed-Use Development, Principal Uses, subsection I.B. and Exhibit B, Development Standards, Land Use Conversion Factors Section III,and are consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] • Subdistrict subsection b.2. provides that "Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of i 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units". [Provisions for residential density are found in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Tract MU — Mixed-Use Development, Principal Uses, subsection I.A. and Exhibit B, i` , Development Standards, Land Use Conversion Factors, subsection III.B., and are consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] ) • Subdistrict subsection b.3. provides that "If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of ) GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 1 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet". [Provisions for mixed use land use restrictions and intensity standards are found in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Tract MU — Mixed-Use Development, Principal Uses, subsection Y.B. and Exhibit B, Development Standards, Land Use Conversion Factors Section III,and are consistent - with Subdistrict provisions.] • Subdistrict subsection b.4. provides that "A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in (. conjunction with a convenience store) is prohibited; however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility greater than 15,000 square feet of GFA are allowed". [Provisions for accessory fuel pumps are found in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Tract MU — Mixed-Use i Development,Accessory Uses,subsection II.B.4.,.and are consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] ) • Subdistrict subsection b.5. provides that "A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a l pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts". [Provisions for a recreational site are found in Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Tract MU — Mixed-Use Development, Principal Uses, subsection I.B.3., and are consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] [ • Subdistrict subsection c.l. provides that "Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a f Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with i surrounding land uses". [This development is being proposed as a PUD. Provisions for development i and design standards to ensure compatibility are found in Exhibit B, Development Standards, and 1 Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, Planning Section V.] —2— i 5 • Subdistrict subsection c.2. provides that "The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and i landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan". [Provisions for common architectural and landscaping themes are found in Exhibit B, Development Standards, Design Standards Section II,and are consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] • Subdistrict subsection c.3. provides that"The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements". [Provisions for internal connectivity are found in Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments,subsection V.H.,and are consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] • Subdistrict subsection c.4. provides that "Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter 4 properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings". [Provision for pedestrian connections is found in Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan, which indicates a "POTENTIAL FUTURE BIKE/PED INTERCONNECTION"", I and is consistent with Subdistrict provisions.] 1 ]jJi • Subdistrict subsection c,5, provides that "At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site �? vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site native vegetation must be retained on-site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required". [Provisions for this requirement are found in Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, section II. Comprehensive Planning staff defers to Environmental Review staff to determine consistency with this requirement.] ( FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. [Comprehensive I. Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] ;'6 In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, . the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: , In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects,where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing , requirements of the Land Development Code. [This site fronts US 41 East. Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan, depicts a single, direct access to US 41 East (Tamiami Trail), classified as a major arterial road in the J. Transportation Element, and; two connection points onto Southwest Boulevard (a local road), which provides access to US 41 East.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan, does not depict any internal accesses or roads. Parts of the development without an access point to US 41 or Southwest Boulevard as shown on PUD Master Plan can reasonably be expected to internally connect all uses eventually developed in the MU, Mixed Use land use area.] f. Policy 7.3: is All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection k. points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of -3- local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan, does not depict vehicular interconnection with any abutting properties; local street connections do not appear to be feasible, as existing development (wall, water management, structures, etc.) presents obstructions on abutting sites.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [With regard to walkable communities,the application proposes sidewalks located on both sides of all streets. Also with regard to walkable communities, application materials depict non-vehicular interconnection, as follows: Non-vehicular interconnection is feasible and proposed in at least one location - to the southeast - in order to provide interconnection to a potential, shared recreational site. Application materials indicate a potential future non-vehicular interconnection along the SE boundary with this adjacent property. Interconnection does not appear to be feasible on the remaining sides,as existing development obstructs interconnection points. With regard to a blend of densities, the application proposes a uniform density-distributing up to 224 multi-family units, with identical minimum floor areas, across the site (or across the non-commercial portion of the site,if project develops as mixed-use). Regarding common open spaces, the application proposes "recreation uses and facilities that serve the residents, such as swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, walking paths, picnic areas, playgrounds and recreation/amenity buildings". With regard to civic facilities, principal uses allowed in the Mixed Use area include civic organizations; essential services, which includes government offices; schools; etc.; and, accessory uses include a clubhouse which potentially could be used for civic purposes, e.g. polling place. With regard to a range of housing prices and types, the PUD application proposes only market rate residential units, and only a singular dwelling unit type - multi-family units -with 1,250 sq. ft. minimum floor areas.] Based upon the above analysis, the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Please note this PUD amendment petition is contingent upon approval of the companion GMPA petition CP- 2013-10/PL20130001767. The GMPA petition is subject to possible changes through the Adoption public hearing process. GMPA Adoption hearings are tentatively scheduled for March 19, 2015 (CCPC) and, April 28, 2015 (BCC). PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Ray Bellows,Zoning Manager,Zoning Services Section Mike Bosi,AICP, Director, Planning&Zoning Department G:Comp\Consistency ReviewsA2015 GAMES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews120151PUDZIPUDZ-13-172a Vincentian REV5_2-25 FNL.docx -4- ORDINANCE NO. 15-. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT .._ CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD,TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 224 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES AND A HOTEL LIMITED TO 150 ROOMS AND A 0.6 FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY (ALF) AT 0.6 FAR. THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE SUBJECT TO CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE OR IF A HOTEL OR ALF IS CONSTRUCTED. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S. 41 IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 30.68+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-37, THE VINCENTIAN PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20130001726] WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Global Properties of Naples, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE The zoning classification of the herein described real property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41) in Section 32, Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for a 30.68+/- acre project to be known as the Vincentian Village MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 224 multifamily residential dwelling units, up to 250,000 gross square feet of commercial land uses and a hotel limited to 150 rooms and a 0.6 FAR and an assisted living facility (ALF) at 0.6 FAR, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached [14-CPS-01292/1151970/11 59 Vincentian MPUD/PUDZ-PL20130001726 Page 1 oft Rev.2/19/15 hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 99-37, known as the Vincentian Planned Unit Development, adopted - on May 25, 1999 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this day of ,2015. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk TIM NANCE, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A -Permitted Uses Exhibit B -Development Standards Exhibit C -Master Plan Exhibit C-1 —ROW Section Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Requested Deviations from LDC Exhibit F -Developer Commitments [14-CPS-01292/1151970/1]59 Vincentian MPUD/PUDZ-PL20130001726 Page 2 of 2 Rev.2/19/15 EXHIBIT A VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LIST OF PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES The PUD may be developed entirely as residential, entirely as commercial, or a mixture of residential and commercial uses. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used,or land used,in whole or in part,within the Vincentian Village MPUD, for other than the following: TRACT MU—MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT Principal Uses A. Multifamily residential uses, up to 224 dwelling units. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. B. Commercial Uses, subject to conversions in Exhibit B, Section III: Up to 250,000 square feet of gross floor area if the PUD is developed without residential dwelling units. If the PUD is developed with residential and commercial uses, the commercial uses shall not exceed 10 acres in size and 128,000 square feet of gross floor area. No single use shall exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area(GFA),with the exception of a group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, or department store, unless the single use is approved by the conditional use process outlined in the LDC. Commercial uses are further limited in this Section, I.B. 1. Accounting(8721). 2. Advertising agencies(7311). 3. Amusement and recreation services, (7911, 7922, community theater only), (7933, 7991 miniature golf course, bicycle and moped rental). A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of three(3)acres of the PUD. 4. Apparel and accessory stores (5611-5699). 5. Architectural services(8712). 6. Auditing(8721). 7. Auto and home supply stores(5531). 8. Automotive services (7549) except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of"wrecker service (towing) automobiles, road and towing service." No outdoor paging or amplified sound systems shall be used. 9. Banks, credit unions and trusts (6011-6099). 10. Barber shops(7241, except for barber schools). 11. Beauty shops(7231, except for beauty schools). 12. Bookkeeping services(8721). 13. Bowling centers(7933). Page l of 16 FR201312013043\WPIPUDA14th Resubmitta112.13-15\Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16.2015)docx 1 r f • 'i 1 r 14. Business consulting services (8748). 15. Business credit institutions(6153-6159). 16. Business services-miscellaneous (7311, 7373, 7322-7338, 7361-7379, 7384, 7389, except for except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile .-..- repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting; contractors' disbursement, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, directories- ti telephone, drive-away automobile, exhibits-building, filling pressure containers, ti field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas ii systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, pipeline or powerline inspection, press clipping service, recording studios, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and 1 slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, swimming pool cleaning,tape slitting,texture designers,textile folding,tobacco sheeting,window I trimming,and yacht brokers). 1 17. Child day care services(8351). 18. Civic,social,and fraternal associations(8641). f: 19. Commercial art and graphic design(7336). 1. 20. Commercial photography(7335). 21. Computer and computer software stores(5734). 1 22. Computer programming,data processing and other services(7371-7379). 23: Credit reporting services(7323). 24. Department stores(5311). 1 25. Drug stores(5912). 26. Eating and drinking places (5812 and 5813, excluding bottle clubs). All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to the locational requirements of section 5.05.01. 27. Educational plants and services(8211, 8221-8222). 28. Essential services,subject to section 2.01.03 if 29. Food stores(groups 5411-5499). 30. Garment pressing,and agents for laundries and drycleaners (7212). 31. General merchandise stores(5331--5399). 32. Glass stores(5231). 33. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to F.S. § 429 and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to F.S. § 651;as defined in the LDC and all subject to section 5.05.04.of the LDC (hereinafter collectively or singularly referred to as "Assisted Living Facility"). '`' is 34. Hardware stores(5251). $ 35. Health services, offices and clinics(8011-8049, 8072,8092,and 8099). 36. Home furniture and furnishings stores(5712-5719). 1 37. Home health care services(8082). 38. Hospitals(8062-8069). 39. Hotels (7011,hotel only),limited to 150 rooms. 40. Household appliance stores(5722). i 1 3 Page 2 of 16 1 H:\20I312013043\WP\PUDA14th ResubmiUal\2-13-15\Vincentian PUDA P1.-20130001726(2-16-2015)docx 1 z i I 41. Insurance carriers,agents and brokers (6311-6399, 6411). 42. Landscape architects, consulting and planning(0781). 43. Legal services(8111). 44. Management services(8741, 8742). 45. Medical equipment rental and leasing(7352). 46. Membership organizations,miscellaneous(8611, 8699). 47. Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents(6162). 48. Motion picture theaters(7832-except drive-in). 49. Museums and art galleries(8412). 50. Musical instrument stores(5736). 51. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051). 52. Paint stores (5231). 53. Photocopying and duplicating services(7334). 54. Photographic studios,portrait(7221). 55. Physical fitness facilities (7991, 7911). A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of three (3) acres of the PUD. 56. Public administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511- 9532, 9611-9661). 57. Public relations services (8743). 58. Radio, television and consumer electronics stores(5731). 59. Radio,television and publishers advertising representatives (7313). 60. Real Estate(6512, 6531-6552). 61, Record and prerecorded tape stores (5735), excluding adult-oriented sales and rentals. 62. Religious organizations(8661)with 10,000 square feet or more of gross floor area in the principal structure. 63. Repair services, miscellaneous (7629-7631, 7699 - bicycle repair, binocular repair, camera repair, key duplicating, lawnmower repair, leather goods repair, locksmith shop,picture framing,and pocketbook repair only). 64. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores(5261). 65. Retail services - miscellaneous (5921-5963 except pawnshops and building materials, 5992-5999 except auction rooms, awning shops, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments,swimming pools,tombstones and whirlpool baths). 66. Secretarial and court reporting services(7338). 67. Security and commodity brokers,dealer, exchanges and services(6211--6289). 68. Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors(7251). 69. Social services, individual and family (limited to 8322 activity centers for elderly or handicapped only; day care centers for adult and handicapped only). 70. Surveying services (8713). 71. Tax return preparation services(7291). 72. Travel agencies (4724,no other transportation services). 73. United State Postal Service(4311, except major distribution center). 74. Veterinary services (0742,excluding outside kenneling). 75. Wallpaper stores(5231). Page 3of16 H;12013120130431WPWPUDA14th Resubmittall2-13-151Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015),docx E'- t 76. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. II. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, including,but not limited to: A. Residential Accessory Uses: 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents of the PUD, such as swimming pools, tennis courts, bocce ball, volleyball courts, walking paths, picnic areas, dog parks, playgrounds, fitness centers, and recreation/amenity buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including carports, garages, and utility buildings. 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 4. Entry gate and gatehouse. • B. Commercial Accessory Uses: 1. Outside storage or display of merchandise when specifically permitted by the LDC for a use, subject to LDC Section 4.02.12. 2. One caretakers residence,subject to LDC Section 5.03.05. 3. Temporary display of merchandise during business hours provided it does not adversely affect pedestrian or vehicular traffic or public health or safety as determined by the County. Merchandise storage and display is prohibited within any front yard but allowed within the side and rear yards of lots. 4. Fuel pumps accessory to a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility, greater than 15,000 square feet of gross floor area, no closer than 300 feet to a residential use. 5. Fast food restaurants(with drive thrus), limited to two (2) restaurants. III. Conditional Uses The following use is permissible as a conditional use, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00. 1. Automotive vehicle dealers(5511), limited to automobile agencies (dealers)retail and only new vehicles. TRACT L—LAKE & WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES: PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: Page 4of16 H:\2013'20I 3043\W"P\PUDA\4th Rcsubmittal\2-13.15\Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015)docx is A. Principal Uses: 1. Storm water management treatment, conveyance facilities, and structures, such as berms, swales, and outfall structures. 2. Passive recreational facilities in support of residential and/or commercial uses or for use by the adjacent Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, including but not limited to boardwalks, trails, pervious pathways, picnic areas, and recreational shelters. Should such passive recreational facilities be developed, this shall not affect the maximum intensity or density permitted in this PUD. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. TRACT P—PRESERVE: PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered,or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Preservation of native habitat. B. Accessory Uses, allowed if additional acreage, above the minimum required, is provided in Tract P: 1. Storm water management structures. 2. Pervious and impervious pathways and boardwalks, consistent with LDC Section 3.05.07 H.I.h.i. 3. Shelters without walls. 4. Educational signage and bulletin boards located on or immediately adjacent to the pathway. 5. Benches for seating. 6. Viewing platforms. 7. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS: Intensity of uses under any development scenario is limited to the two-way, unadjusted average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 1,107 total trips utilized in the TIS dated 10/18/13 (gross trips), allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. Page 5 of 16 H12013\2013043\WP\PUDA14th Resubmitta112-I3-15\Vincent Ian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015),docx I 1 f I 1 i 1 EXHIBIT B VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD i l DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for residential and commercial land uses 1 within Tract MU of the Vincentian Village MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein 1 shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of i the SDP or subdivision plat. I L .RESIDENTIAL& COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ' CLUI3HOUSE/ 1 RECREATION 1 MULTI FAMILY TOWNHOUSE t _ BUILDINGS :.. COMMERCIAL ::::.PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MIN,LOT AREA 3,000 S.F.PER UNIT : 1,800 S.F;PER'NIT N/A 10,000$,I- MIN,LOT WIDTH 90 FEET " 2l FEET N/A 100 FEET 1 i MIN:FLOOR AREA 1,250 S.F./D.U. . j 1,250S,F./D.U, N/A 700 S.F,.' MINIMUM YARDS(External_-measured from the PUD boundary) I From Tamiami Trail and SW 1 50 FEET 50 FEET -50 FEET(Tamiami 50 FEET 1 Blvd. Trail) 1 25 FEET(Southwest l Blvd.) 1 From adjacent RSF-4 zoned 75 FEET 75 FEET 75 FEET' 75 FEET t property.., ,,. s. From adjacent MI-1 zoned 75 FEET 75 FEET ' 25 FEET � 75 FEET 1 (. . .rty . From adjacent C-3 zoned 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET pr9perty 1 MINIMUM YARDS(Internal—measured from internal lot lines). Min.Front Yard 20 FEET s 20 FEET 5 20 FEET m.. 10 FEET 3 Mtn.Side Yard 15 FEET 0 or 10 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET ; Min,Rear Yard 15 FEET :15 FEEl' 15 FEET 710 FEET 3 Min,Preserve Setback 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET " ; 25 FEET Min,Lake Setback° 20 FEET 20 FEET' ' 20 FEET 20 FEET i MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 F f or'./:sum of 10 FT or'A BH,' 10 FEET 20 Fr or'V:sum of STRUCTURES BH,whichever is whichever is greater B)i,whichever is greater greater l MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET :45 FEET NOT TO EXCEED(ZONED), MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 42 FEET' 42 FEET' 42 FEET 52 FEET S NOT TO EXCEED(ACTUAL). 1 MAX.FAR NIA N/A N/A 0.6 v MAX.GROSS FLOOR AREA N/A N/A .. N/A 250,000 SF 1f ACCESSORYSTRUCTURES.:! FRONT ( SPS , SPS SPS SPS 1 SIDE 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 5.FEET„ . I REAR 10 FEET I0 FEET 10 FEET : 5 FEET ' PRESERVE SETBACK' 10 FEET ' ..l0 FEET 10 FEET :• 10 FEET ............. 1 MIN.LAKE SETBACK It 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET 35 FEET SPS SPS 1 NOT TO EXCEED(ZONED) MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 42 FEET 42 FEET ' SPS ..SPS NOT TO EXCEED(ACTUAL.) 1. Defined as a group of three or more units. 1 2, Limited to fee-simple lots under individual ownership. 1 3. Per principal structure,on the finished first floor;not applicable to Kiosks. • Page 6 of 16 Ii:12013120130431WP\PUDA14th Resubmitta112-13-I51Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015),docx } R I t , 1 4. Dumpsters and dumpster enclosures shall not encroach into the stated perimeter PUD setbacks. 5. Front yards shall be measured as follows: — If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. -- If the parcel is served by a private road,setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). — If the parcel has frontage on two streets,a full front yard setback is required adjacent to the shorter street frontage.A side yard setback is required adjacent to the longer street frontage. 6. Ten-feet if a 20'Lake Maintenance Easement is provided in a separate tract at time of platting. 7. Not to exceed two stories. 8. Commercial buildings located within 500 feet of US 41 may be developed at a building height of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 9. Applies to the following use:Assisted Living Facilities, 10. Subject to Land Use Conversion Factors,Exhibit B,Section III. 11. Zero feet if a 20'Lake Maintenance Easement is provided in a separate tract at time of platting. II. Design Standards A. Architectural Theme. i. All buildings, signage, landscaping, and visible architectural infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified. Said unified architectural theme shall include: a similar architectural design and use of similar materials throughout all of the buildings,signs, and fences/walls to be erected on the subject parcel. ii. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the subject site, An architectural plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for the Site Development Plan approval demonstrating compliance with these standards. B. Residential Amenities. The following amenities shall be provided in association with any residential development (other than a caretaker's residence), no later than issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 1006 dwelling unit: i. Resort-style swimming pool. ii, Clubhouse. iii. Fitness center. iv. Dog park. v. Children's playground area/tot lot. vi. Tennis court or bocce ball court. vii. Gated entry. viii. On-site property management if developed as a rental community. ix. Fence, wall or hedge along adjacent public right-of-way (i.e. Tamiami Trail and/or Southwest Boulevard, as applicable). When planting a hedge, it shall include decorative columns minimum of 24" x 48", spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a hedge a minimum of 30 inches in height at time of planting, that achieves 80 percent opacity and a minimum 4 feet in height within one year of planting. C. Residential Construction.For residential development,the following shall be required: i, Concrete Masonry Unit construction and stucco,or approved equivalent. ii. Cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent. Page 7 of 16 H:\20I3\20130431WP\PUDA\4th Resubmittal\2-13-15\Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015)docx iii. Minimum 9-foot ceiling heights within first-floor of units. iv. Concrete pavers at entrance/exit. III. Land Use Conversion Factors: A. Commercial Only Development: Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. B. Mixed Use(Residential and Commercial) Development: The commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of I28,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. Residential density shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property, exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi- family and/or townhouse dwelling units. Page 8 of 16 HAM 3\2013043\WPIPUDA\dth RCSUbmittall2.1115\Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015).docx 1 ative Vegetation and Open Space C-5 ZONING Existing Native Vegetation= 29.77 Ac. GAS Min On-site Native Preservation Reg'd STATION 2O' TYPE "D" WHISTLERS z 29.77 x 15% 4.46 Ao. COVE - P U D MU Open Space Req'd(Comm.or Mixed-Use) LANDSCAPE 30.68 x 30% =9.20 Ac Min Open Space Required(Residential Only) P�� ♦ '7/\\\\c, BUFFER \ 1 30.68x60% =18.41 Ac LPG. /j/ \ If Ja 20'TYPE'"D,�. .� ,V 1 N, .. { LANDSCAPE ` a G -Y'� TRAIL ACRES Q? Op, �; ,. � BUFFER �. RSF-4 ZONING S ,0 : : ` sr�,.,1-1 . zoo j i.e \: \\C* <'s...\s*.' . ,!,� TRACT "MU" x MIXED USE ,(4<:. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ,` \� EXISTING 15'U.E. l—` 1 PER UDC REQUIREMENTS 0 �� `. EXISTING15'U.E,---t a ~ DEVIATION #2 11 `►:. \; eZ WALL LOCATION POTENTIAL FUTURE I m �.. ` BIKE IP.ER1� o , .il\... INTERCONNECTION 0s ± \�\ 15' TYPE ,.B., , 3 1 = oti: • ` LANDSCAPE " \ \BUFFER 15' TYPE "B" 1 cn LANDSCAPE 11 O L i. , % `, BUFFER 1 1 ofl- p i. . r 1 1 Z 11-1 Q 9 0 ` TRACT P I 0 I PRESERVE TRACT _ � VII L:r i. r LAKE z Land Use Summary. EXI5TlNG 15 Lj. .�,Description Acreage Percent' \Mixed-Use(Tract MU) 22.05 71.9/ \l` EXISTING 15'U.E.Lake(Tract L) 4.17 13.6%' ♦ Preserve(Tract P)■ 4.46 14.5% I; TOTAL 30.68 100.0%:. - EXISTING 15'U.E. .,., Maximum Dwelling Units:224 TRAIL ACRES RSF-4 ZONING r LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS A. Commercial Only Development: Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area(GFA),and one hotel(maximum of 150 rooms),and 1 an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6).,Additionally, for every acre of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable € commercial GFA shall he reduced by 10,000 square feet, 1 B. Mixed Use(Residential and Commercial)Development: 1 The commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses,and a 1 150-room hotel and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0..6 FAR,Additionally,for every acre of hotel or Assisted Living Facility,the maximum i allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet:Residential density shall be limited to 224 multifamily residential dwelling units,calculated on the gross acreage of the property,exclusive of any commercial portions, s 950 Encore Way VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD Y -6 I (1v1 R AI JP AI. .01 J2014 Naples,FL 34110 MOM/BY Mx u.a 01/2014 Phone:(239)254-2000 MASTER PLAN R.M IPM. ot/2014:- { HOLE MONTES Florida Certificate of KRncwKr ,I I E1GPEERSPIM# RSBIAIVEYORS Authorization No 1772 -EXHIBIT C "I'-'tb " Y-,2-2015 1 PM n1 Page 10 of 16 H:120I3\20130431WP\PUDA\4th Resubmittal\2-13-15\Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015).docx • i i I : ! i i . . 7 ; 0 : I- 0 s i & 9 g K1 ; ,.- sv; 3 VP i .--.....-....419...... • ii- w 4i _.: 14.D > *di oe ogroandm•v......6.■‘ '.....': In T . E)... 0 w , 1— Z 4-- • 0 ,../., w . ,.. , 0 z a 1 z I cc o f— › , 14.-- ,, — (....) ] r:. Li, z N, 1 ..(.. Z • w z = , i 0 • d x • LIJ V u uj . : ....0 0 0 ri , . D — ... 0 \ 6 . r,'N 0 ,b •oft z tn ci I N5 ihisi < 1.7. in 0'4 0 0 a e r . § a e41.4 . CC W v■07 V.4., s I §—VII 0 UI 1 i I 0 LU • CC ed o. i z 5• 2 (46.1 10. CC Uj cn lizI --t. • __,.., ,z > * . .47 .. 6 4..LA OV W i•• Z ;6 Wa,egi .11.1.......R..1.1=■■■,1 111.....•■•••■1 1....r.•■•■■ 4 SC.i .4 ■ . ._,...3 .1 . liP I& I I - Page 10 of 16 H:l2013 V013043\WPWL1DAVIth Resubm ittal\2-13-151Y incentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015),docx EXHIBIT D VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, = Florida,being more particularly described as follows: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 884.02 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS FORMERLY IN TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 94 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (VACATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 189, PAGE 792); THENCE RUN NORTH 87°30'18" WEST ALONG SAID FORMER NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 695.96 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL); THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. Subject to easements,reservations or restrictions of record. Page 11 of 16 H:\2013'2013043SWP\PUDA14th Resubmitta1\2-13-15\Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015).docx i $ EXHIBIT E VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation 1: From LDC Section 6.06.01.N, requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet for local street rights-of-way, to allow for a minimum 42 foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. !1 F Deviation 2: From LDC Section 5.03.02.H Wall requirement between residential and . nonresidential development, which requires, wherever a nonresidential development lies contiguous to a residentially zoned district, that a masonry wall, concrete or pre-fabricated concrete wall and/or fence be constructed on the nonresidential property, no less than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district, to allow the wall to be located more than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district,as generally depicted on Exhibit C,Master Plan. Deviation 3: From LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 Group Housing, which establishes a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45 for care units, assisted living units, continuing care retirement communities, nursing homes, and dwelling units that are part of an aging-in-place living environment,to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6 for an Assisted Living Facility. { Page 12ofl6 H:12013120130431WP\PUAA 4th Resubmittal12-13-15\Vincentian PIJUA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015)docx EXHIBIT F VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the MPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Global Properties of Naples,LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the MPUD is closed out,then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. IL ENVIRONMENTAL The site contains approximately 29.77 acres of native vegetation,of which approximately 37 percent (I 1.12 acres) is covered with more than 75 percent exotic vegetation. For a commercial or industrial project within the Coastal High Hazard Area, 15 percent of existing native vegetation must be retained (15% of 29.77 acres = 4.46 acres). The preserve as depicted on the Master Plan contains 4.46 acres. For a residential or mixed- use project within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the minimum required is 25 percent, or 7.44 acres (25% of 29.77 acres). Therefore, at time of site development, the developer will either: A. Preserve all required native vegetation on-site (25% for residential only or mixed use, I5%for commercial only development),or B. Preserve a minimum of 15% of native vegetation on-site and mitigate for up to 238 acres (25% of 11.12 acres) of the on-site native vegetation preservation retention requirement off-site, either by monetary payment or by land donation, consistent with the provisions of the Vincentian Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan and Section 3.05.07 H.1.f of the Land Development Code. Page 13 of 16 F1\20 13\2013043\\P1PUDA14th Resubminall2.13-I5\Vinccntian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015)docx III. TRANSPORTATION A. Intensity of uses under any development scenario for the PUD is limited to the two-way, unadjusted, average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 1,107 total trips utilized in the TIS dated 10/18/13 (gross trips). B. Owner, its successor or assigns, shall convey a road right-of-way easement to Collier County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, for the widening of Southwest Boulevard for the purpose of constructing turn-lane improvements to service the Subject Property if turn lane improvements are required as a result of the development. The easement shall be at no cost to Collier County and shall be for the same width and length as the turn-lane improvements being constructed to service the Subject Property. Any required turn-lane improvements at the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East shall be exempt from the compensating ROW provision. Developer shall have the option, so long as the improvements meet Collier County standards and subject to County approval, to construct and relocate the existing County storrnwater and utility improvements on the East side of SW boulevard onto the subject property in lieu of any compensating ROW easement. Drainage and utility easements to accommodate these improvements will be conveyed by Owner to the County, at no cost to the County, free of any encumbrances or liens. The utilities and stormwater to be relocated shall only be in the area where the required turn lane improvements servicing the site are to be constructed. C. The owner and developer are responsible for actual construction costs associated with intersection improvements at Southwest Blvd. and U.S. 41 necessitated as a result of impacts from this development and proportionate share for signal upgrades. The owner and developer of Vincentian PUD are only responsible for modifications and intersection upgrades needed as a result of this development, which will not include any cost reimbursement for the traffic signal at Southwest Blvd. and US 41. IV. UTILITIES County water and sewer service is available via transmission mains located along US 41, '; z Southwest Blvd and the eastern boundary of the subject property. The owner and developer are responsible for providing necessary connections to supply the site with County water and sewer service. V. PLANNING A. If the PUD is developed with residential uses only, the project will provide a minimum of 60 percent open space. Otherwise, the minimum open space shall be 30 percent. Page 14 of 16 H:\2013\2013043 MP\PUDA14th Resubmtttal\2-13-I5\Vincenttan PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015)docx B. The developer of any group housing or retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to the following operational standards for the units in the retirement community, including, but not limited to, independent living units, assisted living units,or skilled nursing units: Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit; • The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; • There shall be on-site dining facilities to the residents,with food service being on-site,or catered; • Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; 'e • There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; • An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; • Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; • Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. C. Landscape buffer easements (LBEs) are shown on the Master Plan within utility easements. At time of SDP, letters of no objection from all utility holders shall be obtained by owner or developer. If such approvals cannot be obtained, LBEs shall be relocated outside of utility easements. D. Tract P,Preserve,where it is dense enough to provide equivalent buffering per the LDC, may count towards minimum buffering requirements. - E. A 15' Type B Landscape Buffer is required if residential development occurs on the subject site adjacent to the Hitching Post Plaza property. Page 15of16 H\.2013\2013043\WP\PUDA14th Resubmittal\2-i 3-15\Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015)docx F. The Master Plan is conceptual in nature and is subject to modifications at time of Plans and Plat (PPL) or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval due to agency permitting requirements. G. Amplified sound shall not be permitted within 125 feet of the PUD perimeter boundary adjacent to RSF-4 or MR—Mobile Home zoning. Within the remaining area of the PUD, amplified sound of any type, excluding drive-through ordering devices, shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM. H. If developed as mixed-use or commercial, at time of the first Site Development Plan, the developer shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. VI. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT If more than 92 dwelling units are constructed, the developer shall provide, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 93'd dwelling unit, a new, quiet-running, extended run-time towable 45kw (minimum-kw) generator per Emergency Management's specifications. The towable generator will be a one-time developer contribution based on the number of units permitted at time of SDP to meet the hurricane mitigation impact for evacuation concerns. The generator specifications must be pre- approved by the Department of Emergency Management as the County has certain inter- operable standards and required safety options. Page 16 of 16 Ii:12013120130431WP\PUDA44th Rcsubmitta112-13-151Vincentian PUDA PL-20130001726(2-16-2015).ducx AGENDA ITEM 11-A CO aunty MEMO To: Collier County Planning Commission From:John Podczerwinsky,Transportation Planning Project Mgr. Date:March 11,2015 Re: South US-41 TCEA Expansion Dear Commissioners, The establishment of a TCEA(Transportation Concurrency Exception Area)was designated in Collier County pursuant to Florida Statutes section 163.3180,under Policies 5.4,5.5,and 5.6 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The existing South US-41 TCEA is demonstrated on map TR-4 in the Transportation Element,and is included as an attachment to this memorandum. As background traffic and vested traffic impacts have increased over time,it has become apparent that certain roadways within the Collier Concurrency network will experience failure. In certain examples,roadways have been maximized in their potential footprint,and are unable to be widened without causing detrimental impacts to the community they serve. In cases such as this,we often refer to these roadways as"constrained." The County still maintains a responsibility to address these constrained roadways when they reach their respective capacity limits. Typically,Collier County addresses known and anticipated failures by maintaining an adequate minimum level of service(LOS)in order to provide adequate roadway capacity to the roadway users within the County. Within the TCEA,provision of TDM(Traffic Demand Management) strategies will,in theory,reduce demand on the adjacent roadway network and address these anticipated and known failures.These strategies are meant to encourage transit ridership, incentivize more efficient use of existing facilities and mobility options,as well as encourage installation of bicycle and pedestrian-friendly facilities. In the case discussed by this memorandum,the County looks to address the deficiency that is being experienced on link 72.0,Rattlesnake Hammock from US-41 to Charlemagne Blvd. This is a constrained four lane,divided roadway with turn lane pockets that has been recognized as LOS "E,"(near failure),and now LOS"F"(failing)in the 2013 and 2014 AUIR's,respectively. County Staff seeks to expand the existing South US-41 TCEA to encompass those properties that gain direct access to this roadway. The package of materials attached herein includes outlines of the proposed expansion area and a summarized listing of all parcels within the boundary,their respective zoning designations,and a determination of"vacant/non-vacant,"in order to help staff determine the scope of the future study. The reason for this request to be presented before the Planning Commission is to seek guidance to Staff to implement a Growth Management Plan Amendment of Map TR-4 to incorporate all properties within the boundary shown into the South US-41 TCEA. The implementation of this amendment can impact not only the vacant parcels within the proposed boundary,but it can also impact redevelopment of improved properties within the boundary as well. The primary goal of the study will be to determine the maximum build-out capabilities of the remaining vacant properties within their existing(and pending)Zoning designations,as well as an analysis of the maximum build-out intensity that could be achieved by the existing commercially-zoned properties within the new boundary. A secondary goal of this analysis will be to determine the impact on the FDOT Strategic Intennodal System [SIS] network,which in Collier County consists of 1-75,SR-82,and SR-29. US-41 is not an SIS(or emerging SIS)roadway. A proposed scope and fee have been included that were provided by Stantec,a consultant to the County. Staff requests direction to move forward with the proposed study,and subsequent direction to forward the results of the study to FDOT for preliminary endorsement of the TCEA expansion. There will be a concurrent process undertaken to amend map TR-4 of the Transportation Element of the GMP,which will be seen by this Commission again in late 2015. Thank you. Laurie Beard Trans.Planner Further information on the purpose and definition of a TCEA can be found at the following link: http://www.dot.state.flus/planning/polic)/growthingt/tcea.pdf Policy 5.4: Pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (MapTR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures established in Policies 5.5 and 5.6 below, and in consideration of the following: (VI)(VIII)A. Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) roadways within the County by 5% or more of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard shall meet the transportation concurrency requirements specified in Capital Improvement Element, Policy 5.3. (VI)(VIII) B. Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on SIS roadways within the County by less than 5% of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard and meets the requirements identified below in Policy 5.6 are exempt from the transportation requirements of Capital Improvement Element, Policy 5.3. (IV)(VI)(IX) Policy 5.5: Commercial developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department that at least four of the following Transportation Demand Management(TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Preferential parking for carpools and vanpools that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development. b) Parking charge that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. c) Cash subsidy that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. d) Flexible work schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips generated by the development. e) Compressed workweek that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by the development. f)Telecommuting that would be expected to reduce the vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by the development. g)Transit subsidy that would be expected to reduce auto trips generated by the development and increase transit ridership. h) Bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and automobile work trips generated by the development. i) Including residential units as a portion of a commercial project that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel. (VI)(IX) Residential developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation shall provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Department that at least`three of the following Transportation Demand Management(TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development(shall be coordinated with Collier County Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities with connections to adjacent commercial properties. (IX) d)Vehicular access to adjacent commercial properties with shared commercial and residential parking. An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the Transportation Division Administrator on forms provided by the Division. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. (IX) Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three years and in three year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification shall meet . all concurrency requirements.Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments will be subject to a concurrency review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network. co a • a) U N 0 o 4 2 a Q z = i COUNTY BARN RD W J a a 5. 00 c� O J \ Q o • V CC W Z , o H co co CO M RS ..# . .//ix 1..AIRPORT PULLING RD O BAYSHORE DR tx O I-- 0 X [ 1\ CL >, IT c t v +r c o n , .. . 3 . ■ I • 4 r I --- I in i > 'Y 11,I �,1 s pE • f, ., , , . _. , H : • . , . ., , i. a„.„ ,, • b ‘ ,,. s -, . ., . . .. . ... ._. . , , • , , . .; , . , , . . . , h ... . ,,. , t' .„.. , . !,, . , . ,, , , , , , . , ,, , ,, 8 - g .3 j d. t , U.1 C.) • Q O. , (4.......00 . . . ..,, I , z . ,,, . , , .. , , , . . , 1 .. r • O CI a w v IP 8 8 ( . . i . ,., ! . ; 0 9 N 2. G IL W v c H m a E.j-•,-,i,l,'':, ,,i” 1 1' a f,c CO E 4 January 27,2015 COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACT#13-6164"PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:ARCHITECT&ENGINEERING" TRAFFIC STUDY, PLANNING AND/OR DESIGN(TR) SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR TRAFFIC IMAPCT ANALYSIS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SOUTH U.S.41 TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA(TCEA) Scope of Work The Transportation Planning Section of the Growth Management Division requires the services of Stantec Consulting Services Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT)to provide assistance to the Transportation Planning staff on specific work assignments related to the potential expansion of the South U.S.41 TCEA,with tasks defined for each study as follows: • Meetings and telecommunications with staff as required • Quantify the maximum potential build-out of land uses on the vacant parcels within the expansion area(as defined/identified by COUNTY) • Calculate potential p.m.peak hour trip generation of the potential land uses to be located on the referenced parcels • Prepare a manual distribution and assignment of the peak hour directional trips from the potential land uses to be located on the vacant parcels • Identify the number of p.m. peak hour trips, if any,that are assigned to 1-75 in the peak direction from land uses on the vacant parcels within the study area • Prepare tables and associated exhibits, maps,etc., as required to detail the results of the analysis Schedule of Work Complete work within 90 days from receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Deliverables CONSULTANT shall provide a technical analysis and supporting documentation, including tables and graphics, identifying the potential p.m. peak hour impacts of the remaining vacant parcels with the proposed South U.S. 41 TCEA expansion area. (s,....it May 22,2014 Page 2 of 2 Reference: Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering Studies Key Personnel CONSULTANT work shall be performed and directed by the key personnel identified by CONSULTANT on the attached Man-Hour and Cost Summary spreadsheet. It is understood that the specified services will be provided by Stantec employees, and that specific staffing substitutions may be made with the approval of the County Project Manager. The use of subconsultants is not anticipated; however, in the event it becomes necessary to use specialized subconsultant services, such use shall be subject to prior written approval by the County. Progress Billing CONSULTANT shall provide written progress reports that detail the work performed on each task assigned. Progress reports shall be delivered to the County concurrently with the monthly invoice. The Project Manager will make judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has been accomplished by comparing the reported percentage complete against the actual work accomplished. Liaison Office The County will designate a Project Manager who shall be the representative of the County for the Project. While it is expected that CONSULTANT may seek and/or receive advice from various State, Regional and local agencies, the final direction on all matters remains with the Project Manager. Compensation The COUNTY will compensate CONSULTANT on a Time and Materials basis using billing rates established per Schedule B of Contract #13-6164 "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering" Traffic Study, Planning and/or Design (TR). A budget to be utilized for this work order has been established and is shown in Attachment A- Man-hour and Cost Summary. TOTAL: Not to exceed$10,704(Time,Materials and Expenses) David S.Wilkison, P.E., Principal Stantec Consulting Services Incorporated - END- FLN U5ECODE NOOSE NUMBER STREET TYPE DIRECTION LOT UNIT NUMBER ZONING ' VACANT ACRES 5515080002 1000 NO WE ADDRESS 13 C-4 55151600003 1000 NO SITE ADDRESS 18 03 Ilirt 5.10 Acres COmmercl.l 49706600043 1000 5201 RATTLESNAKE HAM RD 1 CO 4.94*100310 49706500140 1000 5205 RATTLESNAKE HAM RD 2 OC 2.30 230 Acres GC 70360140011 0 5272 RATTLESNAKE HAM R0 1 RAN 0.46 7006060008 0 536 RIVIERA __. BLVD E 1 .44 013 70360400007 0 532 RIVIERA BLVD E 2 8414 0.12 70050440309 D 528 RIVIERA BLVD E 3 (44 0.13 70604804101 D 524 RIVIERA BLVD 4 0.12 65104040000 •4940 BISCAYNE DR B 019 63151640000 0 NO SHE ADDRESS 33 043004 036 1.30 Acres 01130001401 00423610000 1.••5496 RATTLESNAKE HAM RD 1-3 NO 2.74 0042368003 1300 5484 RATTLESNAKE MOM RD 1 C-3 NO 0923 551514009 7300 4903 TAMIAMI T90 E 0 13 04 NO 1.03 5515144005 1'••4961 TAMIAMI TM. E 14 14 NO 8.72 55151420002 1-•.5101 NO SITE TI1L -15 04 C-4 No 096 NO 55351520002 41 --_ NO SITE ADDRESS C4 55 IIIE 151560004 1.1■0 •5 5025 RATTLESNAKE NAM RD NO 8151680104 MEE= NO SITE ROOMS --IIIIIIIIIZEMIIIIIIIZMIMMIIIMIKM 90370040008 407 507 _- TAMIAM TRL E 41.1 04 NO 293 8037000000 407 5091 TAMIAM TRL E A.2 14 NO 2.93 60370120009 407 5093 TAMIAM TRL E A-3 C4 NO 233 8033016001 407 3089 TANNIN TRL E 04 04 NO 295 8037020080 407 5079 TAMIAM TRL E 01 04 NO 393 80370240002 407 503 TAMIAM TRL E 0-2 C4 NO 233 8037028004 407 5043 TANNIN TM E 8.3 04 NO 2.93 9037032003 407 501 12344030 TN. E 94 04 NO 293 80370360005 407 5071 741,11A41 TM E 41 04 NO 2.93 50370407004 407 3075 TAMIAMI 111- E 02 14 NO 299 80370440006 407 5077 TAMIAMI TRL E C-3 C4 NO 2.93 8037040000 407 5073 7/MIAMI TRL E 04 C-4 NO 2. 8037052007 407 5063 TAMIAN TRL E 0.1 04 NO 2•'c 60310160009 407 5067 TAMIAMI TRL E 0-2 04 NO 2'93 8037060008 407 5069 TAMIAMI TRL 1 0-3 04 NO 2.93 30970640000 407 5065 TAMIAMI 1111. E 04 04 NO 2.93 6037068002 407 5055 TAMPON TM. E E-1 1-4 NO 2.933 80707200/ 407 5059 TAMIAMI 740 E 0-2 04 NO 293 8037076003 407 5061 TAMIAN TM E 0-3 04 NO 2.93 90370300002 407 5057 TAMIAM NIL E E4 04 740 293 90370040004 407 5047 0A331494 TRL E P-1 04 NO 2.93 8070/80006 407 5051 7001AM TM E 0-2 04 NO 233 103709II0305 407 5059 TAMIAM TM E 0-3 Cd NO 2.93 8037096007 407 5049 1014472.4 TM E F4 04 NO 233 8037100005 407 5039 - TAMIAM TRL E C4 NO 2.98 40371040007 407 5043 TAMIAM TOL E 04 NO 2.93 60371080009 ! TAMIAM TRL © ©� 8037112006 ��TAMIAM TRL 04 04 NO 2.91 8037116000 407 5051 TAMIAM 110 41-1 1-4 NO 293 8037120009 407 5035 TAMIAM TRL E 0-2 04 NO 233 8037124001 407 5033 1920930 141 14.3 04 NO 2.93 10371200003 407 5037 1A046304 TRL 444 04 NO 293 10371320002 407 5073 TAARAMI ML 1-1 04 NO 233 807136004 407 5027 TAMIAMI Till 1-2 04 NO 2.93 8037140003 407 5025 TAMIAPAI 191. -3 C-4 NO 2.93 80371440005 407 5029 TAMIAMI 140 E 14 04 NO 2 /047148007 407 5015 TAMPON 791 1 0-1 C4 NO 2'i 9037152006 407 5019 TAMWN TM E 0-2 04 NO 233 60374.56004 407 5017 792929923 TM E K-3 04 NO 093 8071000007 407 5021 TAMMAS TM E K4 04 NO 293 80371640009 407 5007 TAAIMAB TM E 0-1 04 NO 2,43 803716&701 40 5011 5011 AA01744R TRL E 0-2 04 NO z.93 8071720000 5009 ■1011 ©0 30371760002 • 5015 AMMO l E L4 C4 NO 2. 8037180001 407 4999 AMIAMI TM E 14-1 C4 NO 2.93 6037134009 407 9003 wawa TM 0 40.2 C-4 NO 2.043 80571880005 457 501 TAMIAMI TM E M-5 C4 NO 2-93 8071920014 407 5001 TANNIN TM E 044 C4 NO 233 803719600 407 4991 TANSANI M E N-1 C4 NO 293 903720004 407 498 TAAUMB TRL E N-2 04 NO 233 8037204006 407 4997 TAMAMI TRL E N-3 04 NO 1.53 807209008 407 4993 743411410 101. 6 144 C4 NO 2.93 8097212007 407 4989 TAMIAN! TRL E P.1 0-4 NO 23 3 90372160009 407 4987 TAMIAN! TRL E 0-2 C-4 NO 2.93 803722009 407 4919 TAAN! TRL E 0 MI P.O C4 NO 293 83372240000 407 4995 TAMIAMI TRL E 04 1-4 NO 2.99 010372290302 407 4975 TAAR644 TM E 0-1 04 NO 2.93 10372320001 407 4979 1A04(4341 TM E 6-2 04 NO 2.93 707236009 407 4988 TAMAMI TN. E 04.3 C4 NO 2.43 8037240002 407 4977 TANNIN TRL E 44 04 NO 2.93 4970500247 •• 5375 HIBISCUS DR 1 GC NO 3.66 0042956000 ,.520 8PAEM BLVD E MM NO 0.:4 55450960001 7100 5130 0 RATTLEMJAKE 1 HAM RD 31 PHD NO 1039 55151640005 400 6051TE ADDRESS 19 914F-12 NO 5 • 5519168007 400 NOSITE ADDRESS 20 IMF-IT NO 4A3 6679904002 400 4955 PEPPER 00 101 160-12 NO •• 6673080004 40 4955 PEPPER T30 100 8441-12 NO 5.30 66730320003 40 485 PEPPER OR 109 RMF-12 NO 6670010005 404955 PEPPER CIR 19 110.0-12 NO 5.0 66730700004 400 4955 PEPPER OR 105 106K12 NO 5.•• 66730240006 ∎•4955 PEPPER OR 106 04100-52 NO 3"' 6673028008 ••4955 PEPPER an 107 4Tb-12 NO 5,90 6673032007 400 4955 PEPPER OR 104 030-12 NO 5.90 66730390009 400 4955 PEPPER CR 301 034142 NO 5.50 66710400006 000 4965 PEPPER OR 202 10340-12 NO 5.90 6673044000 400 4955 PEPPER OR 203 10.41-12 NO 5.93 66730400002 40 4955 PEPPER OR 200 0340-12 600 530 6673052001 40 4955 PEPPER OR 205 0940-12 NO 530 64730560003 400 4555 PEPPER OR 206 10444-12 NO 592 6673000002 400 4955 PEPPER CIR 207 414•12 NO 5.90 66730640004 400 4955 PEPPER OR 200 R NO 5.'•. 6673063006 400 4957 PEPPER CIR 101 RAN-12 NO 5.90 6613372005 400 4957 PEPPER 01 102 MA 12 NO 5.90 6679076007 400 4957 PEPPER CIR 103 0147-12 NO 530 6673080006 40 4957 PEPPER CIR 104 094042 NO 5.90 6673034003 400 4957 PEPPER OR 105 RMF-12 NO 5.90 6673080000 400 4957 PEPPER OR 106 9140d2 40 5,90 66730920009 -400 4957. PEPPER CIR 101 0690-12 NO 5.90 66730960001 414957 PEPPER CIA 202 4)690-12 NO -5.90 66731000009 - 495] PEPPER OR'-_ -203 830012 NO 5.90 66731010001 '-4004957 PEPPER CIA 54 RMF-17 NO : 5.90 66731060003 400 4957 - PEPPER OR 205 669532 NO -5.90 56731120002 :'4004957 PEPPER OR 206 :::RMF-12 NO ':''5.90 6673(160004 ':'::400 4953 PEPPER '-OR 101 PMF-12 NO 5.90 66731200003 - 47074953 PEPPER OR' 102 RMF12 NO 5.90 56731240005 -::-'400 4963 PEPPER C q:'.': -103 :.8690-12 NO 5.90 66731285(07 4044953 PEPPER OR .101 "RMF12 NO "5.90 66731320006 4904963 PEPPER.......... ...'' OR- 105 0690-12 NO -5.90 66731360003 '400 4963 PEPPER OR "106 :''0690-12 NO .5.90 66731400007 400 4963 PEPPER CIR 203 0691,12 NO 3.50 66731440009 400 4563' PEPPER .CIR :'202 041-12 NO 5.90 56731450001 -400 4963 PEPPER CIR 203 0691-12 NO 5.50 6 67 3152 0 0 0 0 ::4004965 PEPPER CIR 204 6691-12 NO --5.90 66731550002 400 4963 PEPPER CIR --::205 9695-32 NO -- 5.90 66731560001 404]4963 PEPPER CIR 206 4695-12 NO 5.90 56731640003 4004567 PEPPER Oft 101 RMF11 NO . -5.90 66731650005 49704967 PEPPER CIR:':: 102 6447-12 NO -5.90 55731720001 '4U)4967 PEPPER OR-:' 103 "-044142 NO .5.90 66731760006 401 4567, PEPPER . OR: 104 0441-12 NO -5.90 55731800005 4504907 PEPPER 526 S: 115 0691-12 NO 5.90 66731840007 : 4004967 PEPPER OR ' 106 005-12 NO .5.90 5673(580509 400 4967 PEPPER OR 201 RMF32 NO 5.90 05731320406 :4004967 PEPPER 65'.:': 202 969112 NO 599 06731560000 4504967 PEPPER OR 203 :9691-12. NO 5.90 66732000008 4904557 PEPPER OR:::. 204 9691-12 .NO -5.90 66732040000 : 1304957 " '' PEPPER COO:.• 205 ::..RMF12 NO. :'5.9) 66732080002 :'400 4967 PEPPER OR '206 IMP 12 NO '-:5.90 66732120001 400 4973 - PEPPER. OR 151 0647-12 NO -5.90• 65732160003 :400 4973 PEPPED Ofl:: 102 :':.RMF-12 NO 5.90 56732205002 -:"400 4973 PEPPER OR':'' - :-103 '4M747 NO 5.90 66733240004 :400 4973 PEPPER - OR.:: 104 6MF-12 410 -5.90 06730250506 4004973 PEPPER OR 105 RME-12 NO ".5.901 06732320005 490 4973- PEPPER OR 106 : 0167-12 NO -5.91 66732360007 ::4004973 PEPPER OR 201 RMF-32 NO '5.50 66731450006 :::4004973 PEPPER OR: 202 RMF-12 NO 5.90 06737440008 :'.405 4973 PEPPER OR 203 P14F12 NO 5.90 6613 3 4 80 9 0 ':.4004973 - PEPPER CIR':.: 204 "'RMFO2 NO :'5.90 66732520009 - ::'400 4973 PEPPER OR -'.205 RMF32 NO 5.90 557325991 .400 4973 PEPPER ...OR 206 - 9534 32 NO 5.90 55090040008 4004951 PEPPER :CIR -.1016 0447-12 NO - "::4.41 95950*04)0 400 4951 PEPPER CIR 1520 ''''.5030-32 ND ::4.41 9090120019 '410)4951,', PEPPED CIR - 503A 0011-12 NO -461 9090167001 400 4951 PEPPER CRI:: ]046 RMF-12 NO 441 99075090 --400 4951 PEPPER COP -- 1056 :'6042 40 461 5990240002 ::4004951 PEPPE0. - . CIR:'- 1505 - 6015-12 NO '-4.41 X60260001 -.:-400 495] PEPPER CIR '1075 001E42 NO - -:::4.41 9090920203 :':':400 4953 PEPPER CIR: 1084 - RMF-12 NO '::441 309035505 400 4951 PEPPER CIR'': 2015 : PM'7.2 NO '--'441 30904000 4 '.4069951 PEPPER OR.:' 2026 RMF-12 NO :0(81 '90904409)0 4704951 PEPPER CIR - 2036 005-12 NO 4.41 5090480005 -:4004951 PEPPER OR 2090 0097-12 NO '4.4] 90905207 400 4951 ' PEPPER Oft::: 2055- - : RMF32 NO : 4.41 9390560009 4004951 .. PEPPER OR 1066 RM1,12 ND .:'-4.41 009)010005 :.'4004951 PEPPER 7070 -.'900-12 140 :4.41 909064009 40)4951 PEPPER CIR 200,0 04,91-32 50 :-.4.41 909)640026 :.49 4977 PEPPER CIR 1010 5697-12 NO 4.41 9095640042 400 4977 PEPPER CIR::'. 1020 : RMF-12 NO - 4.41 9090640068 ':49 4977 PEPPER CIO-- :1036 6690-12 NO 4.41 9090640084 4001497] PEPPER CIR - ]040 - 0615-12 NO :4.41 9090640]07' '400 4972 PEPPER CO:':: 1051 : RM112 740 - 4.41 X90910.10129 4504979 PEPPER CIR'': 1061 RM4'-12 NO 4.41 909)649149 ::4704977 ' PEPPER CIR 2019 ::6615-12 50 441 9) 90140165 ::40014977 PEPPER CIR 2026 :NMP-12 NO 441 9095540111 .:':49 4977 - PEPPER CIR': - 2030 RMP-12 NO 4.41 69090640204 4903977 PEPPER CIR:'.- 2040 -:PMF-12- NO - :-:461 9093640230 49 4977 PEPPER CIA:" 205(3 -:5045-12 NO ::4.41 9070640246 4354477 PEPPEq CI0.:- - 2066 P440-12 NO 461 1035540262.............. '4004993 PEPPER 00..'. 60141 8441-12 NO - 4.41 909)640288 400 4983 PEPPER CIR 3029 :-9695-32 NO 4.41 9090640301 4604983 PEPPER OR::: .:"1039 RME-]2 NO 4.41 9090540327 400 4983 PEPPER OR 1049 0691-12 NO 461 3050640343 -'494933 PEPPER .R:-_. 1059' RMF32 4.0 :4.41 5090640369 4304933 - PEPPER OR:-: 1069 9695-32 NO 4.41 909064035 -4O)4983 PEPPER OR 2019 RMF17 NO '4.41 9050645405 4064983 PEPPER... OR 2029 1695-32 3,0 14.41 9090 640424 :.494989 PEPPER ' OR 2.739 RMF-12 NO 4.41 9090640440 400 4.993 PEPPER CIR: 20414 .:0695-12 NO .::4.43 3050640466...... ............4044953, PEPPER CIR 2054 0610-12' 90 -:401 92+0640162 :.400 4953 PEPPER CO - 2,060 964012 NO ''4.41 9090690595 "49 4907 PEPPER CIR:: 1011 0645-32 NO :.4.41 9090`'.40521 ':::420 4987 PEPPER Clft:: 5071 6611-27 50 4.41 9090640547 4704557 PEPPER CIP 3031 RMF-12 NO 4,41 9090040563 :::4(9)4967 PEPPER CIR:: 1041 0615-12 NO :-4.41 9035640589 -49 4917 PEPPER Clfl': :'. 1051 - 5615-12 NO '441 69)990406)2 -'400498] PEPPER CO: - 1061 8145-32 NO 441 9]90690626 400 4987 PEPPER CIR -:-1071 - 0145-12 NO 463 90'5640644 :.494917 PEPPER CO::: 108) 003E-12 1)0 4,4, 9190640660 "4004987 PEPPED 136':': ':2011 4141-12 NO 4.41 69090610686 460 499] PEPPER CI0. 2021 RMF-32 NO '4.41 9390640709 - :::400 4987 PEPPER :CIft':: 2131 - 8611-13 NO 441 9090640209 -400 4987 PEPPE0. CIR : 2041 409E-12 Ni) 4.41 69390610741 -'404 4991 PEPPER -CII':' 2151 -'905-12 NO -4.41 69090640767 450039................ ' PEPPER OR':: "2004 RMF-12 NO :4.41 69090640759 -400 4987 PEPPER 1)4': 2071 •-:905-32 NO '441 49090640506 '4004907 PEPPER '.OR 205 RMf-12 90 '4.41 24180040002 40(1 4900 EISCO79E : DR'.:: 1 0695-16 NO .:-L14 141798091 -'.400 4900 815 4090 OR 2 RMF16 NO 1.54 24170120003 4904900 SISCAYNE'-. OR::-. -"3 -905-15 00 -:1.34 24170160005 400 4904 OISCA5NE: DP::- 4 4MF16 NO 1.34 24170200001 '400 4900 9)57.0090.: OR:-: 5 0695-16 NO .1:34 24570740046 - 455 4904 7(110156 50.:'. -:.6 4140-16 00 -'104 24170)80008 49 4900 5ISCAYNE-::: OP' '.:'7 -'069015 NO 1,94 241703220007 - :'-40]4900 RI1A4NE::.: OR :'-8 0695-16 NO -:.1.34 24170304009 ' :...:400 490 :5916)5E'' 01': :. 9 4MF-16 90 1.34 24170100]08 .::::45340 4900 BISUYNE;' "-'DR^ 10 RMF-16 _N) -- - 1:34 24111440003 400 4900 1130)190) 3.33 11 - 4590-16 13 0 134 24170440002 , "-4004900 815080E 463 12 PMF-SG N7 1.34 243705100E 1:400 4900 8133,410E :OP 13 -PMF-16 M1D 1.34 24170154,49 .15304900 0IS43430 E' OR:. 14 - RMF16 NO '1.14 241700000532 1.:13.:3'1':;•1.-1:'400 4903 ::i:: BISUYNE:E.:: DR 15 0.591-16 N 1.34 24170600004. T400 4900 -- 015141530 DR 1' - AMF-16 N -1:34 24170650006 ""..:.:'.. '::::40534900 BI3GYNE DR.:. 17 4M0-16 N '::1:34 24170720005 .. '.:'400 4900 515GYNE'.: DR:: 14 NMF36 NO :':::194 34370700007 :4004903. SISCAYNE.0:: DR:::: • 19 __ R2A4-16 NO 134 241]0803006 -::400 4900 .-815080E DR 2J _...._ 13341•16 NO - 1.34 241715346', ::.403 4900 -. 51%08141::: CDR" 21 RM1-16 NO 1.34 241708(00530 1:1400 6900 .. 50(AYNE':.: ..:.OR 21 __ 459116 ND -- 241740 9253 4 53 9 ':44034 BISGYNE..I::' DIE 33 - RMF-16 4411 ::124 24173960001. ::24001900 :: 815080E DR-::. 24 414F-16 NO ::1.34 24992500021-• :400430 1:'_VALLFF STREAM DR'.. 101 _ RMF16 NO 1.91 24992500347 ::'400407 VALLEY STREAM DR : 102 4147-16 140 3 1.31 2499'2500063.: ::400400 VALLEY$TAEAN1 UR 103 _ RMF14 NO _ 1.31 2499x00069=.' :`-4053100 - VALLEY STREAM OR 104 RA11-16 INO .131 24992500002 3"1•33 VALLEYSTAEAM OR 133 PMf-16 NO 1.31 24952500126 :'1400400 VALLEYSTREAM DR 106 459116 NO • 1.31 24992500144 400 000 .. VALL0YSt0(ANI :.077 I 107 0.591-16 �N0 -1.91 24 9 92 5 0 0160 •- .• .::400 400 VALLEYS1AEAM 013 _108 __. RMF-54 NO ''::1.31 24992500186 -3:13='-400 400 VALLEYSIAEAM :)It- - 1333 459116 NO '.1.31 34992500309 '400 400 434019510E601 OR 110 9591-16 340 -:1.31 24992500215 :1400400 1;:VALLEY STREAM DR 111 131317-16 '41 1:31 24992500241 "::'4000053 VALIEYSFR1.0343 �DN'. 701 AMF-16 NO 1:31 24992500267 41104053 VALLEY ST11411 90:.:: 702 0591-16 ,90 1.31 24992500283,::,., 400400 :':- "VALLEY STREAM -DR:: 213 AMF-16 7 ,N0 1.31 24991500306 :,'./00/00 :.:�IEY STREAM -:DR: I %64 RMF36 NO 1.33 24992500322 ':.400 403 "'VALLEY5TAEAM DR": 205 : RMF-16.. ENO 1.91 24992500346 :.4053 400 ::VALLEYSTAEAM DR':.: 2(19 -- RMF36 NIl 1:31 ,NO .. 24992500364 '-ROD x00 -.::VALLEY.STAEAM ?:-530..:'. .710 l0 RMF36 ( 1.31 24994500380 :.400400 VALLEYSTRFdM b0.-:: { ]:L _ A241-16 ND 1.31 309(060%X18 :400 7053 :.VALLEYSTAEAM DR _ 1343 RMf-16 IMO 1.36 30990080070 '4053 700 VA4LOYSIREAM 00: 101 RMF36 1N0 "1.38 30980120003 =::400 700 - 'VALLEY%7,41,459 OP. 102 41911316 ,NO 1.14 3D9B0163001 - ---'4530 700 -:VAllEYSTAEAM oA 133 41311-16 41311-16 V0 1.38 353980200000 -�-400 700 ;:.:::VAl1jY51AEAM ,5311; 104 ,45911E NO 138 30980240002 -.400 700 :I VALLEYSTREAM DR 200 RMF-16 NO 3.34 30930290.04 ..:400 700 .:00 VALLEYSTREAM DR". 211 343-16 NO 1-38 30980373003 - : GU 700 ::VALLEY STREAM '-DR:'. iV2 RN 2-16 NO :1.38 30380360005 3 :400 700 ": .VALLEY STREAM OR 303 4147-16 NO 1.34 9d]AM000Oq _ -400 700 � '::';. VALLEY.57RFAM Dft �ti x59116 NO 1.38 30914141(8106 :400 700 : VALLEYSIREAM Dit - _ _ - RMF10 NO :'1.38 33980480008 :400700 VALLIYSTREANI DR D21 11M1-46 NO 1.38 309805200537 -400 7311 ::VALLEY%141,459 Ofi :12 31M1-16 VD 131i 30980560009 7.400 700 ��::::VALLEY STREAM : OH :_ _'�i 459116 40 1.38 309406)0005 :-1400700 '.' VALLEYSTREAM loll .0,1 RMF-16 NO _ 1.34 55150920001 400 73. 440915400135 1.1 _ RNF-16 \D ' 1:75 55150900003 .. 400 93091E 4941455 _ __ _ _l'.7 0344-16 13+0 , 275 55193000093 - '.'400" NDsOE,4534,4153 1.0 -AMR-16 3/0 1.31 551530(0045 -400 9400018808405 _ _ 1?5 AMF-16 Ml ::0.76 55151120306 400 980911E ADOR 155 .136 059216 NO 0.66 931511600.:".:::1":73 100 "4405004000457 1'7 8591-16 v0 1.30 ssss12600rn .. =4053.- NO9ITE:ADDAE53 10 AMF-16 41 .....1.55 55151900000 ':'i^ 400 '=''NO SITE ADDRESS 17 RMF16 Ya : 0.52 63103880009 : '+-'" 400 '::'NOSITE AOPAEtS 1 ''RMFY6 NO 190 00103920008 -. -.113,11Z1.1:::,1.1.3::10534924 -' 815070E'' DR S IMF-14 30 ..:O.ltl 300 -..'.�VALIIY STREAM DR 5918336 1`!01 275 7873000.43T,..'. 4053300 VA3.1E2378E01.1 00 51311-16 3.0 2.75 78730000009 :400 300 VALLEY SYR CAM DR.. .0 4417-16 \11 2.75 75730003335333-3:'1.1,3:. '.400 300 : VALLEY STREAM :f, 4 PM1-16 NO 275 ;40 275 78730000101 .. -":-400 300 -.:VA1IEY.SfREAM A a0. 434145 78730000114 ::400300 VALLEYSTH FAM� on 6 31M1.16 v0 275 78730153140 400 01X1 VALLIYSTREAM OR I RMF-16 ND 1.75 7(730000166 . -4537 300 :.VALLEY%1,41,459 DR- ':PM.f16 NO _ :._2.75 75739000182 -:403 300 E'VALLEY STREAM 54 9 RMF-16 NO? 773 78131000205 :41X)344 ::-.:VAlLFY STREAM Dft :. 1 10 5741-16' .::\'D 2.75 75730000221 403 300 :: VALLEYSTREAM DR : 11 111314-16 1N 2.75 78730000247 ::.400 34) VALLEY5IREAM 077 I7 RMF-16 NO -1.75 78730000263. :403 2141 -::0-::.VALLEYSTREAM DR. 1 13M2-16 NO :7.75 78730000249 ' :' 400 200 .:::-t':`. VAIIEYSTREAM -:DR I ] RM1-11 ND : 2.75 76730000302 -.400 200 4016E9579E461 OR I 3 0690--16 130 2.75 7B730000328 _ 400 74 :VALLEY5TREAM DR- 4 _ RMF-18 NO :2.73 7873001x1344 -400 200 VALLEYSTREAM DR' _ '' 3MF-16 NO 2.75 78730000360 400 200 -VA11E35113EAM OR L 11101-16 ND 275 79790000556 :..410 2053 :1::0::VALLEY41REAM :::OR 7 4590-16 N3 - 2.75• 78790003409 .403 200 • VALLEYSTREAM :OR x ;.4MF-16 NO 275 74730000025 400 200 >::VALLEY51A6AM OA''' 9 RMF36 ND .'2.75 78790000441 :::400 200 VALLEYSTREAM OR'- 10 RMF10 ND :::2:73 76730000167 .400200 VALIIVSTRFAM DA::1 _ _l. 112A2-16 NO 78730000483- - '407 200 VALL0037REAM OA::: 12 ::RM1-16 • NO -2.75. 78730000945 _ -400 200 : VALLEY STREAM OR,: 1 RMF,14 NO %`275 787353000522 :_400200 -:VA1IPYSTREAM DR-: --- __ RMFi6 NO .':':7..75 78730000548 ':::400 200'. -'--VALIEYSTAEAM. -::❑A 3 PMF-16 NO :x:'1.75 787300005E 400 200 ...: ::VALLEYSTNEAM DA.. n _ 943E-16 NO :.;.:.'2.75 78780000580 ' 400 210 VALLEY 5171,46 - DR: :RMF36 N0 ::-2.75 78730004603 420200 VALLEY SIREAM Ok - RMF-i6 57 '::1.75 ]8730000629 400200 -�1-VALLEY STREAM uN 3 _ 4M4•14 53 .. 2.75 78730300645" 400700 -:.VALLEY STREAM DR 9594-16 7- '.7.75 78730000661 430'700 "-VACIEYSTREAM PR 4141-16. ND :4';1.75 9 787300053687 :400 200 ...:::::,::VALIEYST6EAM OR 10 RMF-16 Nil 2.75 74730000700-• - :400 200 VALLEY STREAM DR 11 RMF-16 NJ 275 78730000726 403 200 -;.-.'::VALLEY STREAM DR -[ #54816 410 275 787905300741 -:::.400 300 VALLEY STREAM -' PR .. :.RMF-16 NJ 275 7873(0(0765 -'4530 300 1':::VALIEYSTRGM-.. DR'. ,2 #591-16 6,1 : 7.75 74730000764 :::400 300 46114991RU59 DR'.:" E 7_ _ RMF-16 NO '275 79730000807 :::400 300 VALLEYSTRFAM DR 9591-16 NO 2.75 78730000817' '.4Q0 903 :':VALLSYSTRFA61 OR::-. 45 - _ _ 41318-16 NEE.. • :-0275 • 78730300849 ::400 300 '.:'.:.VALl.EY51RUM' . DR'.:: RMF-16 N) 1::.2.75 76730004865 :400 300 :::VALLETSTREAM DR -7 RMF-11 NO :2.75 78770000!81 -'::400 900 ..1 901168STAEAM Uft B RMF16 _NO '..'7�5 78]30000904. --40X;300 VAILFY STREAM. - E k _9 -_ 314F-11 130 2.75 7()900530920 ::400 300 ::::::..3::VALLEY STREAM - UH__ _ lu RMF36... NJ__ 2.75 78730000946 :400 300 �:. VAILEYSTRUM OR 11 0M1-16 VO 2.75 7 67 3 0 0 41962 ':::'400 300 VA 614114EAM DR . ., 12 _ AMF-16 ND -.::2.75 7882004(002 `400 60 VALLEYSTREAM DP ': AI "RMF-16 NO 0.66 78820080009 '400 60 ..: VALLEYSTRGM DR::- A2 PMF-'S8 NO -0.86 78620120008 '''400 600 VALLEYSTREAM DR: - 81 - :'RMF-16 NO -. '.0.86 76820160IX7O -:430 600 :':YAIIEVSTAEAM Oft:: 02 RMF-16 NO -'0.86 78.9202)2)09 .:400 800 VALLEY STREAM 1M'' -: CI -:NMF-16 NO '0.06 78826200001 --'460 WO YAILEY5TNFAM DR: (6 AM.58) NO -0.86 78870090002 :400 600 :VAOEYSTREAM OR' OS RN1F16 NO ':.:0,52 28870092)174 400 600 VALLEY.STREAM DR! 02 :' AMF16 ND ' 0.52 ]88)0120003 '4026207, VALLEY STREAM DR'.-. 03 41AF16 NO -0.52 78870160005 -400 000 :::VALIEV STREAM DR: 94 RMF36 NO :':0.52 788702000)0 :::,400 600 VALLEYSf0EAM OR:-: ':'05 : RMF-16 NO - -0.52 288]0240006 '''40600 <VALLEY STREAM 00.: O6 RME-I6 NO :'0.52 788700802)6 '400 660 VAL4045701844 ORS':: 07 RMF-16 NO -0.52 788]0320007 : 400600 VALLEY STREAM DR::'. 18 RMF-16 NO -0.52 78910010004 4006101 -VALLEY STREAM DR: - F] - RMi-16 YO .:.055 78920080606 ::400 600 '::VAU.EYSTREAM OR'.. F2 RME-IS NO '"'0,55 78920120005 '900 600 VALLEY STREAM OR:: '.:F3 RMF-16 NO '0.55 78920160007 :'-90 600 VALLEYSTREAM -OR::: F4 - AMF-16 NO .:0.55 78920200006 400 600 VALIEYSTREAM DR- F5 PMF-1S NO -0,55 2 8 92 024 000 8 :':'.q(0 630 VALLEY STREAM :0P:: :' F6 :'RMF-15 NO :'0.55 78920280000 460 60 VALLEY STREAM DR':- f7 RMF-16 NO '.'0.55 ]89201201769 -.:40 FAO : VALLEY STREAM ER- FB RMf-16 ND :'-035 7692)360001 .400 600 VAl1EY STREAM OR:: F9 RMF-16 NO -:0.55 78920400000 "400600 VALLEY SIREAM OR FSO 844116 NO 055 7892004)002 :':'400 600 : VALLEY STREAM OR: - 111 RMT-16 NO 0.55 7892046001 -:'10 60 VALLEY STREAM DR F12 PMF-16 NO X0.55 ]8970670])9 ':40060 VALLEYSTREAM .' DR El :'.PMF-16 NO 0.76 7117 0 80 0 01 :'40 COO VA'.lEYSTREAM OP-: E2 PMF-]6 NO 0.76 ]89706200 Y1 ':'.400 600 VALLEYStREAM OR' E3 :RMF36 NO ':0,76 769]0100302 '400600 -:VALLEY STREAM DP E4 R7AF-88 NO 0.76 ]69]020001 - --''40 60 VALLEYSTREAM OR:: ES NMFl6 NO : 0.76 78910246003 -:400 500 VALLEY STREAM Dfl:' E6 RMi-16 NO 0.76 78970180005 ''40 600 :VALLEY 58NFAM DA E7 flMF36 ND 0.76 78970320001 -'40600 :- VALLEY STREAM DA--. EB :"RMF-1R NO 0,74 80920016005 .:400 300 - VALIEYSTIIEAM DP 100 RMFl6 h0 1.75 8092068000] ^'90100 VALLEY STREAM OR: 101 RMFS6 NO 1.75 00920120006 90100 VALLEY.STPGM DR: 162 RMf-16 NO 1.75 80920160008 --:40100 VALLEY STREAM DF 103 6051-16 NO 1.75 6092)2000) ::400100 VALLEY STREAM -..-.DR 104 :-PMF-16 MO 1:75 8092024009 :.400100 VALLEY STREAM 7R:'. 305 ::-RMF-16 NO '.1.75 80930280001 :'400100 VALLEY STREAM DR'' 2110 ::NMF-16 NO 75 6)900320)0 ::'.400 100 VALLEY STREAM DR 201 PMF-1L NO 75 80910360602 :.:40.100 - ---.VALLEYSTREAM ::OP- 20) RMF-]6 NO 1.75 80920500001 -400100 VAt1EY STREAM UR 203 RMF]6 NO .'0.75 80920140003 :"'400100 VALLEY STREAM DR: 200 RMF1L NO 1.75 8092068005 :"9010 - VALLEY STPFAM OP:: 205 RMF-36 ND :'1.75 80920520004 '40010 ::VALLEY STREAM --DR- 300 - RMF15 NO 75 80920560006 '::400 500 :'VALLEYSTREAM DAB' 30) -:-RMF16 ND '1.25 80920600115 :4010 VALLEY STRF-AM DP ::302 ':RMF-]6 NO -:1.76 80320640007 400100 VALLEY 60904M ➢R- 303 AMF16 ND - :'.1.75 809206601609 - '::42)]0 VALLEY STREAM DP. 304 :AMF16 ND 175 83920720038 400 700 VALLEY STREAM ON- 305 NMF-16 NO 1.75 63105960030 30 9930 BISGYNE OR' 6 RMF6 90 ':0.16 631044060)6 100 4936 BISCAYNE OR': 7 RMFL NO 0.19 65104080001 900 NDS8TE ADDRESS 9 850-6 110 0.39 63101120031 7500 996/ - BISGYNE: DP 11 RMF-S NO 0.40 63151680602 :''9105006 HAWAII BLVD 14 :PMF-L NO '0.15 77663042006 :40 4952 813GYNE DR AS NO 0.19 77640040068 40 4952 RISGTNE Dfl A2 .RMF-6 NO 0.39 7766017(3)7 9009908 815GYNE Dfl-: BI -RMFL NO 0.39 77660160009. '40 4948, BISGYNE DP: B2 - RMF6 NO 0.09 776602(57008 "'400,4950 DR: 01 • . - 7766D24662) -qw 49.w- 05(60501. OA C2 flMF6 NO 0.39 5490004((06 --1(0102 WILLOW CNEFK - EN- 1 :..PSF-3- NO 0.28 549000600)6 .:1001M 60)11060 CREEK LN 2 PSF-3'. 400 ::0.23 549017110)7 ':100 106 -WILLOW CREEK LN'. 3 ASF-3 NO 0.23 54900160009 100108 WILLOW CNEFK LN: 4 - -::'PSF3 NO '::025 54900200006 '.:100 110 WILLOW CREEK IN: 5 q5F]: NO 0.61 54'xx124000 ::160 109 ':WILLOW CNEFK LN: 6 RSF3' NO ::0.33 5990260302 :10 007 WILLOW CREEK IN T ASF-3 NO 025 54960110001 -:100 305 WILLOW CREEK W 8 RSF-3' NO :.0.23 5490036]003 ]0 003 WILLOW(PEEK W' 9 .. :RSF3 NO : :.:0.23 54900435002 000 101 - WILLOW(REEK W 10 R5f-3 NO :0.26 509304/0004 10173 oONAL CIR' 7 RSF-3 NO ':0.28 59960480006 ::10171 00PAL (LA 2 RSF-3 NO 3 5490050005 :100 169 )ORAL (I0.: 3 FSF-3 NO 0.23 54001560007 ::100 167 CORAL ::-CIR 9 :-ROT-1 NO -024 54906000()6 :::160165 OOPAL CIR 5 RSF-S NO 5/960643606 -10163 CORAL CIN L RSF-3. NO :0.24 54900600060 :'17.161 00605 - CIP ] :RSF-3 NO - ::-0.23 54900720009 - ":100159 CORAL- -: CIP a RSF3 NO - --0.23 54900760001 - 100157 CORAL :- CIA 9 -RSF3 NO 0.23 5990(80000 ::30155 ➢ORAL LIE 30 - -':RSF-3 NO ::023 54900890002 100 153 )ORAL "'CIN 11 PSF3 NO -0.23 54900680304 -300 IS] DORM 04 12 RSFa NO -0.27 599x:920603 SOD 149 UUNAL GR 13 RSF3 NO 0.27 54900966005 '100 147 DONAL :GR i4 451-3 400 0,27 54901600301 :100145 )ORAL ON 15 PSF3 070 '0.24 54903030003 :10143 UORAI GR 16 8SF-I NO 0.23 549)1080007 '10141 CORAL OR 17 PSF3 NO 0.25 54901120004 100 139 )ORAL ❑R 18 flSF3 NO :017 54901160008 1(x1137 )ORAL - GP 19 PSF3 640 0.26 549612000177 ':100 535 0884!. GP 20 156-3 NO :0.23 5407240(x79 :500135 DOgAL GN 21 RSF-3 NO 023 54901280001 :.160]31 CORAL - CIR 22 RSF-3 NO :0.23 549D1320D0 '300 129 00001 CII '....23 RSF3 NO :.0.23 5490134002 -:-100127 908AL - CIR 24 - - RSF-3 NO ::0.27 54901400001 ,12)125 0OPAL, CIR -25 RSF-3 NO 0.31 50901440003 -'-00)12l 00661 CIR 26 459.3 NO -.2.31 54901480005 100121 OORAL CIP 27 .811-3 NO 0.23 5 4 9 015 20 0 05 :'100119 )ORAL ::-CII :_.:28 -R51-3 ND ::023 54901560006 "100 117 CORAL CIR -:29 - NSF-3 NO :'023 5490160305 :'.100 115 UORAL -'CIN 30 RSF-3 NO :0.30 54001640007 100113 DOOM CIA ::.31 NSF-3 RO '.:0.40 54901680311 "10111 00801. - CIR 32 RSF3 h0 ::0,26 54901720008 'x.:160 709 80001 LPL -'33 -:-850)3 h0 0.23 5490175017) '::1111107 )ORAL CIR 94 850-3 NO 0.23 50901600009 :.::-:100 103 .OOgA1 OR: 35 .:.:R5F-3 NO ::::'0.23 54901860001 .:::108109 DORM 71 36 - RSF3: NO :.:023 54901860003 :'::SOO lol 00041 CIR 37 _430-3 No '0.28 54901920002 :::`]00101 WARWIIX Hi IIS DP::: 2 RSF3 NO - :0.29 5496/960004 :..::100103 ; WARWIIX 241115 ::':Ml'::: _.__ 0363.. NO 013 54902000002 ":300105 WARWICXNILIS DP-::. _ 3 83.3'. NI 023 51902040004. :'.'.110107 WARWIIX HILTS DP:::. _ n R54-3:' N_O_.. .:021 54902080006 :t"'100 109... - WARWICK HILLS DP S R1F-3''. ND .. .:':0.23 -:::SW 111 WARWICK HILLS ::.OR". -_ RSF3 NO 0.23 54902160007 ":180113 1 WARWICK HILLS DR::: 7 RSF-3 NO :.031 54902200006 `100 112 0080E CSR 8 030.3. NI) 0.35 54902240006 :100 110 DOPAI OR': ._ -..3 ___ RSF3.: NO .0.23 54902260000 . :: • -:300106 .: DORAL . ' OR: 12 018.3:. NO _-_ 023 54302400000 -:.100102 00004 - OP 113 858-3 NO '.030 54902440002 100 101 OAKLAND HILLS :14: 54302480004 100103 '::::„NOAKIAND HILLS oR.: 2 -.850-3 NO 0.25 54902520063 ::'100 105 OAKLAHD4OILIS OR.: 3 058-3:. NO -0,25 5490660005 :100307 :::OAKIIIHD HILLS. :;DR 4 ':RSFI:: NO :.:015 54902000004 100109 -"::OAKIANO HLLS UP: - 5 ::8563 NO 0.25 54902640006 100111 -..10AKIA140 HILLS GA: C _ RSF .. NO 0.37 54902610008 100114 !WARWICK H111.5 110 / RIO-S NO- ::035 54907720007::. ::100112- ',ASWICK HILLS DR I. 8SF-S.: :.. NIl 0.25 54902700009 - ::100 110 'riAiWIC'I(HLLS DR: 9 _ :R5F-3-: 1.0 0.25 54902p000p0 :100 106 ------WARWICKHLLS U0: _ _ 10 RSF3- No 0.25 543011340000 :100105 WARWICK 441115 ':DR: : :. 11 1SF-3: INO ::0.25 54902800002 '100104 ::WARWICK HILLS- 1 OR 12 850.3 iV17 ::0.25 54902920000 100102 'IWARWICK HILLS 13 -RSF3 NC 0.31 549029610933 ':100196 00841 OR`s R3F3: '0 _02] 5490300]001 :'100144 DORAL OR- 2 050-3 YO :'0.23 54903040W3 i 300142 OO1NLL ':`.:Oft : _I1- 010-3 NO. :.C.23 54503080035 _ 100 130 ..-: DORIC:2, .0 OR 14 : 115F-3 Ni). 0.27 54903120004 '300 110 OAKLANOHILLS. .. DR �_ �5 RSF3:. NO 0.31 54909180006 :'100108 -':.....OAKLAND HILLS Dp.. �o RSF3. NU ::0.23 54903200005:- 100106 :.'OAKUND NILL3. DR::'' - /: 85103 :: II 0.23 54303740007 100104 0AKLANOHILLS OR:? 3 R58-3 NO 0.23 54303201009 -':'100102 :"':':OAKLANOHILLS :::DR':. :y9 -- -:RSF3. AO 0.26 , 2 2l ; ; 2222 ( ; 22II, « ( ! ` ^ . \ - oo „ „ \ 2 � g } • . a 1 | ! 1 ! k \ e ! ; { ! ,° } — / . . \ , / 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 i A x ° ƒ - ` _ ! - , ` , I \ \ 7 7 ! ) k °1 ƒ k 'E' § , w — « % i , ° \ . 7r 5 a: /l / | § [ 3222 [ { # § § § a2 Jaa. } Eas ; @a § & a2i \ .ii 1g t ! r !!{Ja . !! - _ �� ! - rzt� � k { § 7 4 ^ ° ; ail . . g0o0 . . . rya, o , , . | ! r U. 2! ! & « , z „ U. !2 ! § % ! k k ` ■ G Inc ' $ E , ) I 2 | ! f § L ; / r2 � l � k § \ � ) § t km ) k § \ � f \ uk t k | � § � \ \ 2k) % \ . ) ) f ( § ( I ( E ) t / ,6o § j ) f ) � 15k ( E \ § j5 ) / 7 ( § ) § : � a & . 2 ! -0- ,8 t ! I ! £ \ / k ! \ qk / 3 §