The URL can be used to link to this page

CAC Agenda 03/12/2015 Collier County : March 12, 2015 Page 1 of 2 IMPORTANT NOTICE:If you are experiencing difficulties viewing our website please be sure to clear your browser's cache and/or refresh the page. MARCH 12, 2015 Share&Bookmark Font Size: Print Feedback Meeting Agenda and Notice COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE(CAC) THURSDAY,March 12,2015-1:00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS THIRD FLOOR,COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES •Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions •2015 CAC MEETING DAIES I.Call to Order II.Pledge of Allegiance III.Roll Call IV.Changes and Approval of Agenda V.Public Comments VI.Approval of CAC Minutes 1.February 23,2015 VII.Staff Reports 1.Expanded Revenue Report VIII.New Business 1.Out of Cycle Fund 195 Grant Application Additional Funding Request-Naples Pier Rebuild* * Amendment No. 1 **Exhibit"A" 2.Collier Creek Work Plan arid Dredging Requirements* * Draft Feasibility Study Collier Creek **Proposal 3.BOEM Sand Lease Approval *Backup Material 4,Marco South Beach Monitoring Report and Renourishment * Monitoring Report **Appendix 5.Collier County 2015 llardbottom Biological Monitoring* *Proposal IX.Old Business X.Announcements XI.Committee Member Discussion XII.Next Meeting Date/Location April 9,2015 Government Center,3rd Floor XIII.Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend,and to register to speak arid to submit their objections,if any,in writing,to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gail D. Harnbright at(239)252-2966. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,FL 34112,(239)252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. http://www.colliergov.net/index.aspx?page=7544 3/1 1/2015 CAC March 12,2015 VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes 1 of 7 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, February 23, 2015 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Jim Burke Thomas McCann John Sorey, Ill (Excused) Joseph A. Moreland (Excused) Nick Penniman (Excused) Debbie Roddy Robert Brown Ian Butler Steve Koziar ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney Gail Hambright, Accountant Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples CAC March 12.2015 VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes 2 of 7 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online. I. Call to Order Mr. Burke called the meeting to order at 1:00PM II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Thomas McCann was welcomed as ca new member of the Coastal Advisory Committee. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda ills. Roddy moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Butler. Carried unanimously 6—0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. December 11, 2014 Mr. Brown proved to approve the minutes of the December 11, 2014 as submitted. Second by Ms. Roddy. Carried unanimously 6— 0. VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report The Committee reviewed the "Collier County Tourist Tax Revenue FY 14 TDC Revenue Report dated through January 31, 2015. VIII. New Business 1. Approval 2015 Beach/Inlet Monitoring-IIumiston & Moore * ;; Proposal Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve aproposal from Humiiston &Moore Engineers for Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring for 2015 under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order for a not to exceed amount of S 163,795.00 and wakes a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism" dated February 23, 2015 for consideration. 1-1e noted: • The work is a requirement of the beach renourishment permit issued to the County by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. • The results of the monitoring will be utilized by Staff and consultants to plan the l V 15 County beach renourishment projects. • The work includes monitoring the conditions of Wiggins and Doctors Pass. • The Pelican Bay and Clam Bay Beaches are included in the scope of the work. CAC March 12,2015 VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes 3 of 7 Mr. Brown moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve a proposal from Humiston & Moore Engineers for Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring for 2015 under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order for a not to exceed amount of$163,795.00 and hereby finds this expenditure promotes tourism. Second by Ms. Roddy. Carried unanimously 6— 0. 2. Approval WP Intermediate Dredge IMP Package * Wiggins Pass Straightening Implementation ** Draft Wiggins Pass Technical Specifications *** Bid Schedule & Questionnaire **** Wiggins Pass Plans Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Wiggins Pass Interim Dredging Project" dated February 23, 2015 for information purposes. He noted: • In 2011, the County undertook a project to address navigation issues in Wiggins Pass. • Ilistorically the Pass required dredging every 18 —24 months to ensure it remained open to boaters. • The goals of the project were to improve boater safety in the channel, straighten the Pass in the most cost effective, environmentally friendly means and to lengthen the dredging cycle from 18 —24 months to 4 years. • The concept included undertaking "touch up" dredging between major dredge cycles as needed. • Recent monitoring of the area indicates the project was successful with only minor accretions of sand in the area to date. • Three locations are proposed for"touch up" dredging: an area approximately 200 feet outside the channel in the Gulf, the mouth of the channel and an area where the channel intersects the Wiggins Pass Park channel. • One issue that has come to light is the sand placed on the southerly end of Barefbot Beach is eroding faster than expected. • Staff is analyzing the issue and no sand will be placed in this area until a more robust ebb tide shoal develops. • The current proposal is to remove approximately 9,400 cubic yards of sand in the areas identified. • fie intends to present a contract for approval of the work at the next meeting. 3. WP Peer Draft Report Review Mr. McAlpin provided the Report "Draft Peer Review Wiggins Pass 1 Year Post Construction Engineering Monitoring Report' prepared by CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. dated February 2015 for information purposes. He noted it is a companion to item 2. 4. FEMA PW 2700 Second Appeal Supplemental Review * Backup Material Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "FEMA PW 2700 Deobligation Second Appeal Supplement" for information purposes. He noted: • In 2011, FEMA deobligated funds awarded to the County in 2008 for beach renourishment projects completed in 2006. CAC March 12,2015 VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes 4 of 7 • The deobligation was based errors the Agency believed occurred in quantities of sand reportedly placed on the beaches. • The County appealed the deobligation and recovered a partial reimbursement of$1.8M. • New data on the quantities of sand placed on the beach has been developed and the County has filed a 2"d Appeal to be heard in Washington, D.C. in March of 2015. • The data addresses discrepancies in the previous analysis of sand quantities placed on the beach. • The appeal seeks funds reimbursed in the amount of approximately $8.6M. • He will provide further updates as they become available. 5. Collier Creek Draft Study - Update * Draft Feasibility Study ** Appendix Mr. McAlpin presented the Draft Report"Feasibility Study Collier Creek Collier Couuuily, prepared by CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. dated February 2015 for information purposes. He noted: • The Creek has been compromised by sand accreting from Hideaway Beach into the mouth of the Creek. • The County authorized a feasibility study to determine a long term solution to the problem. • The study identified a series of options to address the issue including: 1. Enlarging the Entrance Channel to Equilibrium Cross Section. 2. Move Terminal Jetty to the West. 3. Remove Terminal .letty. 4. Adjust Terminal Jetty 5. Modify Dredging Practices 6. Coastal Structures to Realign and Streamline the Creek further to the West. 7. Constrain the Flow in Collier Creek. • One item to be noted is lands on the west side of the Creek are owned by the State of Florida and any options utilizing these lands will require approval by the necessary Agencies. • The final solution may be a combination of the options identified. • An intermediate dredge of the area may be required before the final solution is implemented. • The cost for the solution is estimated at $1M - $2M and has not been accounted for in the Department's budget. • Any sand removed from the area will be placed on the area beaches if it won't negatively impact the navigation function of the Creek. Speaker Ben Farnsworth, President, Villa De Marco West addressed the Committee noting the study accurately identified the problems in the Creek and the solutions are reasonable. Ile recommended the goal be to return the area to the year 2000 geographic condition. Mr. McAlpin noted at this point, the goal is to move forward on developing a long term manageable solution to the problem without preference to the historic conditions of the area. CAC March 12,2015 VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes 5 of 7 The Board of County Commissioners may appoint a Work Group to study the issue and ensure Stakeholder input is garnered when developing the ultimate solution to the problem. Ms. Roddy moved to endorse Staff's concept of presenting the findings to the Board of County Commissioners an obtaining direction on how to proceed to address the issue. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 6— 0. 6. FY 15 CAC Grant Applications Mr. McAlpin reported the notification the Coastal Advisory Committee is accepting Category "A" Grant Applications and the information has been has been disseminated to the public. 7. Doctors Pass 2015 Monitoring Report * Doctors Pass 2014 1-Year Post Construction Engineering Monitoring Report ** 2014 Bathymetric Monitoring Survey Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to review the 2014 Doctors Pass Post Dredge Monitoring Report dated January 2014" for information purposes. He noted the monitoring has been completed and the report will be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners. No major concerns were identified in the report. IX. Old Business 1. LGFR Update and FDEP Project Ranking * * Beach Management Funding Assistance Program - Document No. 1 ** Beach Management Funding Assistance Program - Document No. 2 *** Beaches, Amendment 1 and Project Funding **** Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "FY-2015/16 LGFR Update and FDEP Project Ranking" for information purposes. He noted the County is seeking approximately $1.5M for reimbursement from the State's of Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program. He cautioned indications are, given the amount of appropriations to be approved for the Program, the County may not receive any funds. 2. 15 Year Permit Application Status Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summar■ "15-Year Permit .lpplication Status- for information purposes. He noted: • The County has submitted an application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protections and US Army Corps of Engineers for a 15 year beach renourishment permit. • A pre application meeting identified several issue to be addressed including possible impacts on "listed species" and concern panther activity may be negatively impacted by the truck haul routes. • The existing FDEP permit expired on January 17, 2015 and the County received a 2 year extension to the permit until 2017. • The USACE permit expires in November of 2015 and Staff is attempting to obtain an extension, however the Agency is reluctant to consider the request given a new permit application is under review. • He will provide future updates as they become available. CAC March 12,2015 VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes 6 of 7 3. 2015 Beach Renourishment Plan Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "2015 Beach Renourishment Plan" for information purposes. He outlined the schedule for the renourishment of County beaches which includes design work over the summer and placement of the sand on the beaches to begin in November of 2015. 4. Central Marco Beach Regrade Environmental Concerns and Status Mr. McAlpin provided an update on the project to regrade Central Marco Beach noting: • The preliminary plans and specifications have been developed for the project which proposes regrading the area to eliminate long term stormwater water ponding on the beaches. • Approximately 150K cubic yards of sand will be regarded/added to the area. • An issue has arose with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the US Fish and Wildlife Service whereby concern has been expressed the removal of sand from an offshore source may disturb the habitat for the shorebird colonies on Sand Dollar island. • Staff is meeting with representatives of the Agencies over the next two weeks to discuss the concern and the project will not move forward until the issue is resolved. • One option posed by the Agencies is creating a super dune system utilizing vegetation. • IIe will provide updates as they become available. X. Announcements 1. 2015 CAC Scheduled Meetings Ms. Ilambright provided the Memorandum "2015 CAC Scheduled Aleetings" dated December 2014 for information purposes. Mr. Brown moved to approve the 2015 CAC meeting schedule as proposer!by Staff. Second by Mr. Butler. Curried unanimously 6— 0. Ms. Roddy moved to appoint Joseph A. Moreland as Vice Chairman of the Coastal Advisory Committee. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 6-0. XI. Committee Member Discussion None XII. Next Meeting Date/Location March 12,2015 —Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 2:40P.M. CAC March 12,2015 VI-1 Approval of CAC Minutes 7 of 7 Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee Jim Burke, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended CAC March 12,2015 VII-1 Staff Reports 1 of 18 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX REVENUE FY 15 TDC Revenue Report 28-Feb-2015 FY 15 Adopted FY 15 Current Var to FY 15 YTD _ Description Fund Budget Forecast FY 15 YTD Forecast FY 15 YTD Actual Forecast Beach Facilities 183 763,1001 877,560 303,530', 350,325 46,795 TDC Promotion 184 5,984,200 6,881,867 2,380,300 2,747,268 366,968 Non-County Museums 193 406,100 467,013 161,530 186,433 24,903 TDC Admin 194 1,980,700 2,277,813 787,850 909,312 121,462 Beach Renourishment 195 6,276,600 7,218,108 2,496,599 2,881,497 384,898 Disaster Recovery 196 - - - - - County Museums 198 1,637,900 1,883,539 651,478 751,918 100,438 Gross Budget $17,048,600 $19,605,900 $6,781,287 $7,826,751 $1,045,464 Less 5%Rev Res (852,400) Net Budget 16,196,200' Collections %Budget %over FY 14 %over FY 13 %over FY 12 Month Actual FY 15 Cum YTD Collected to Date collections collections collections Oct 684,811 684,811 4.02% 19.12% 9.07% 30.36% Nov 965,779 1,650,590 9.68% 1024% 31.50% 39.62% Dec 1,234,208 2,884,798 16.92% 16.82% 28.67% 33.47% Jan 1,949,763 4,834,561 28.36% 28.25% 52.75% 61.33% Feb 2,992,190 7,826,751 45.91% 17.27% 45.43% 56.90% Mar 0 7,826,751 45.91% n/a n/a n/a Apr 0 7,826,751 45.91% n/a n/a n/a May 0 7,826,751 45.91% n/a n/a n/a June 0 7,826,751 45.91% n/a n/a n/a July 0 7,826,751 45.91% n/a n/a n/a Aug 0 7,826,751 45.91% n/a n/a n/a Sept Q 7,826,751 45.91% n/a n/a n/a Total 7,826,751 7,826,751 YTD 18.96% 38.39% 48.87% Current Forecast 19,605,900 115.0% Budget Comparison 5 Yr Collect 5 Yr Collect Budgeted Actual Budget to Actual Current Month History-Cum History-Monthly Collections Collections $Variance Forecast Oct 3.49% 3.49% 595,571 684,811 89,240 684,907 Nov 8.03% 4.54% 774,277 965,779 191,502 890,418 Dec 13.85% 5.82% 991,655 1,234,208 242,553 1,140,403 Jan 21.80% 7.95% 1,355,468 1,949,763 594,295 1,558,788 Feb 34.59% 12.79% 2,179,798 2,992,190 812,392 2,506,768 Mar 49.79% 15.20% 1 2,590,959 0 n/a 2,979,603 Apr 69.10% 19.31% I 3,292,420 0 n/a 3,786,283 May 78.91% 9.82% 1,673,511 0 i n/a 1,924,538 June 85.23% 6.32% 1,077,171 0 n/a 1,238,747 July 90.15% 4.92% 838,810 0 n/a 964,632 Aug 95.41% 5.25% 895,890 0 n/a 1,030,273 Sept 100.00% 4.59% 783,070 0 n/a 900,531 Total 100.0% 100.0% 17,048,600 7,826,751 I 1,929,983 19,605,890 i Tourist Tax Revenue Collection Curve 5s o I • $3.5 L.. : ,,, 3 ' A\ 53.0 - ,.$2.5 -- $2.0 t, -Budgeted $1.5 __ _Actual .......°6°°1# \ rcr«as1 $OS - $0.0 314/20153:27 PM H:Utevenue RepornMonthly Sales,and TDC Receipts 0 o .0 N a o N N N • L N U .-+ , N - Q > U , ra . IA .. C f w - (n ,,., .1 Z: (:'.5 j C • • I-, : * * y; • ' * F'. X < •:Y (L � f: .-.1'7 J C:) r2,(2 .) .. i) 1 C> i: ..x_ cT 44 , , 7 ,x.. N ) - a ..'„ ) . CC, ,D i <-, 2 . . . N s . , . : C) C, 0 ■,— , , , N 0_ o • , , , „ , . . cv " co • - , • C.) 5 < C) • . , : .'"1. n- „ r.,,- '..r.: 7-- , N. r.-- '..r: N.■ N. ,•-• .i C'„ ,r'. ;•: , ...1 !:, ,......; :-.^.. „„, , ,,',. ,..., ....', ..c, . ...7„' ,-..., : . -. ..7.., . rr, „...--, < ,..-, 3 < c...1 ,.,-:', :---.:. .: ,V, „7: , ,:, „ < :,,-,4 S,-..„ •-..14 ' E--.„ ,,, : ,:. • C ' „ rrr ' : , C.r., ' ,■ ::',I I:.: :2, : H :_:.) 1 .E.--, CD c..-, : -.CD 'r .-:- tr„ , () r,-) cr.:, , (.,,'„ (7, , ,'..•,'„ , ,r2, c...,1 .:DJ , E-- r- , ".:.-- ' E----, cr.., , • , „ r r: "..), (7; : N. ' Li) : ..1-,: , . . 1 _ .,... ('.) : r 7 , :',) 2:.) ' (:) : CD -.. , ',,E.---D . :::. • - , 'EE) ,----, , , `C„..„, . :-..: ,EC , '' , < , ,,.; . "I.: ■ '.--, • . . , ,..,.; , , 1-I ■ ,i - ,_, • - ,--i ,....: : ' . • :::::, 2 , ')-14 , :;:,'L 2 , 2 ..,.. .... ..), , „.., _ - ' :""., : -. ::) -. , . ,... , ,j ... , '::.) .3. , (3 ) , ' 4 ').4 : 4, '-.„ N '- ; „.;,-. „ '-k, „ •,..• < - k ,-, : •-,,-'`,41-, ,,k < , < i C.',„e-,,.., , ;'---,< ...);: N N.,,-1 . -)-.:-,.. , .)::: ",-., - ,.).. : .--,2)„, Ll. , 4 ":).: :)':, : 4 < _ .._, ..,,.„ -.7.: 4. ,.:,. ' ki-•'.-..C,,,, : :„..,•,•-.4 , f47,„,:-.,- , „.,•_„„..-e„ ,....,4 , I.' ,... •,•.:••:•-•.„ ..1.:C--:f-, - r:).:.1, , . t.-...Y,I,.„ ,...:,,,,i, : Cy),'„, '1 E.-i.Y.4 k•14' ' CNN ,,. •..,- - Lt.•„<-1, • 4-4,4-',., „ •...,..'< N : NC) 4,47. 4..., ' ' V 0:: , 2, ' < .:,.::, < z ..,J : :::::: ■ 7rJ , rt.r ' CT:: H., * , * ! * , 4. , 4: : * * 1 * 1 4 * CC ,...": ".....:* :r: , * .''.„ : 4., ilr: , * ::::: , * :': , * ar: , * a,„ , 4' .:1•:: , 4, Ur., ,. 4, 1,,. ■:_,:„'; , < , ‹' ,-e. ' <:, : <r,, ' ''',.: E E '.,Ei.: ■ n.', , :-',•:E:, , ',':'' , ,,,,x- • Z. , E..... , N .,..E.D, f-x, - L-Er.; c-.-:, , -,-2, ,,p , m c., , ...., ,-.. ',...,... . c..:1 , f.,. c.1 - L.L.'„ ,..)::: „ 2 .:::), ' L:., ::::, E.) cc , 1,1 .,, ' ,...,: . 1.rr, „.--.1 1,_ ..,-) L.,..... :Tr:, „ ,.,.., (2:-., : '',, : :‘,...„ ,:„ . a. T:::: 4., ' C., ix .„ : . -,-: C) '-.2,, u, , ;?. r'-'. , •;.-, -:.. , ';,-'! ',-, , 2 ,-.',..' , 4 ''') .,E, '-`, ' ',-?..1 [E-- , 7'1 . ;E; Er: E, r."...: (...; ,;.L,' ...S., ■ ,-S., ...r. ■ .,-.-C ,:.: . ,7; L, , ,r .1, ,..",, ,:: < Cr, r.,1, , <1; 7- ') ,..' ) r4 : ,.) ,DE: ; ED ....D , ..: EE; , ET': --, ' `D: (D: .-..ir, .Z., ,T. ra-.• i •....,, ' [--- ' r---- , ,:.r..'., ('.,, 4-4-, , _) •:.!" , (....) ,..7, ■ ",..) "') ' L..) —: • L....) < :"...j, —, '....., ,.. ' C.: r: .,--, ,.., C.,.-: ',..,-• , '..:„„ 0-, I i,1,,, ,..-• : ..4.1 „;• , .4., •-•"4 • •-..1 r- : 141-1 'I-, ' .4: 1,,., n C.' , -.„ T-, , (.• ':.4 r •,. .<-4 ' 1,-, : 0 f`) : .):::), 4", „ L,:) : ,) ), ' , '7, : . • 4„ : „ >1 • „ , , .. , ... , •'„ > .1,, : > •,',-, . > ,...." ' .> 1`.1 „ ..., „-, : ',,,> (: i > in , > „',-, I > ,... , .... (.., '',... • 4'..., -''. ' .Z., •--..., ' .•?., ''..,,,, '„, '3. ' „r'T.., CC.' : ..7, 4.C' ' ..-=•!, ' -..-... •.--, : • , . •,.„. •.•,' %.--- ,-.7•, , ••••,-1 „S„.. , c..-3 ,I.,--• : E, ,,. - ."..- (ED ' E--, ,--, , E-, c-,, , ::E `- , E,E, ,,,-; c.. ,x- ; ,E) r- „ ,"_;„ :.„"? . ,,) --.. „ r,,,r. „....,-, , r) : .•) (,., ^-, (.,:'■ . „::: .„4 , C.', r," . C.-;„ ,„:„'„ , C. '.•- , (..-..‘, ,._, ., , . .. .„ I,) , ar „ „ „ N CO •D to 00 .-1 N N O 00 m ''-4- W O t7 lO to r1 lD N 1-1 r-1 CO O N N N •i 0 N CO CO V .-1 Or H N." V d Vf H .-1 01 O N a a O O > V1 IA '-1 01 l!1 N CO 01 N 01 N Q..... O1 1� N N V lD CO O1 01 d 0 1,1'': rri MT CO"' rn" CO' m ni et .: m (V y N v? N N W VT 0t VF V} N y1 L c6 i w m Cr as 7 "I M U -- i- v ° VT m p to c0 cO W N W N aN N N N N N o N `'-I Ott N Ot CO V V V C cO • oi 71 V 0 CO N N N N N N N N N N. N tot r V V 0■m 0 g'i N N I, N N N N .n N °y ✓} °W (0 0- • v io X N N N N N N N N a rn Q F- m N v W • m 0 v a m N CO a v N N N N F yr w >t- F- a Z z• a p tcr Q U N • K a 0 O W N N N N N N N N N N J N J O CO K co 0 r 0 0 o rt, r 0 a a o O 0 m w� N Lo ,yr N N N N co • co N N > O V OO a O n O L.Z Cr al N N N t, N N N N N N m E m 1O CFI 1 t on CV o v Cvl N N N N N N N N N N ,, -rvT K' CO Q ti W ti o Z• N N v, N N N N N N N ,y' uF N m co o ry 0 100n OF v 0 o ry ° N O 'n' N v N +n N N N N N ,..j v} ¢ w o o> Q o Cl v k- V 1""°LL r, N N N ry r, N .i .-1 0 CO V m ,-1 m Co M CO FJQ- 03 00 00 Co Co DO N a, N co .D O N 0 N m l0 00 0 N a1 co •+ of .-i ry ai vi v r- o .ti '^ 4-- >- 03 Co 01 Co N 00 0 m 00•-1 al o O ,y .y CD .-1 N - 00 01 00 DO N O.O Q r+9 ni rri rn m rrt M m V H N tn. 1J' Vl 1/F V? N K 1/F in. to W L CO U C .-1 N m b ac 2 T ry co, v • 2 CO Q N an .n vi VI uv .n ✓v vU rl .D O r^ N Lo co r C N co a o, 8 v, an an N IN N V N cc M N an .n an to v) an an nj h 0 .ii oo n 'F'D n Z o vl .• .n th to ✓1 ✓1 an .n Uf M Pr, o ct LA "-d N Q ✓ti ti ti N N v, an an N I— I— CI) Ln J 01 Co 01 cn D O CO 6 O 00 cn Qa an t., an v, an v, .n an v, N • ~ O Z u M X ,, 8 0 C Q D or CC o 03 v, v, C .n CI Co 'Cl an v a J J 0 co L..) CD EN V tv 1,1 C m ti CO p ,y ti an v ) an .n N v, V a a a °v 0i Z n, ry ry cs? N ?; an an an .0„ v, v, an v, uti a„ Vl C M co co v. to v, v, to an to v1 K U1 m, .vi, Co Co N ovo v, 01 01 an � uv .n w 01 a Co I, L•f0 o m w m O ti 00 co O - an v, a" v, an an an an 01 ,M.j an C w co o o 0- o° 0 .--1 Q ry ry I- ry n, r, cc N !V n, r, vo p Ln n N N N 01 to N M m - r CO h ^ w lD VD ti N a, laA l0 p V _ > O O . W .^i .~-I 00 00 W co- Ol N V1 O N a Q V} W VT V1 V1 H in 1/Y h H N C i v L N � ¢ m W U a .n .n — .n an .n .n an .n m Q > VAT U �i v~ r., N 7 V co 7 W Q.: .n' .n yr �� in v. vi .n lD > d o ^ tp,m N an an- VT Z v m v ^ VI. N Q v O ^ N O EN Ul• m. m N th N . x VT Q F F h cc d ry C lD O w QI ut ti N h m v v N vt - I- -la N }- Y F O D -O m o U ^ N m n vVt o 2 n n n w w J -J 0 I.-/ N v lD o m• N v. uti u, u. N > p v d W D d v v o cn Z i ,-i .n ut `- O Q Vt in v, N N R' m n m N to a U N v uti N ur, uv W h N of a K tt CO d . lD ° a> ,n u} ■n a w .n .n ^o N 'n z w K� m t O N n N C v t, v. N .n v .n .n Vt .n Vt .n In O in CC ct m oo m■>2 o ° o 0 o N o a ✓. v O CD,y ry ry ry ry ry ry ry IN ry ry ~ Ln IN •Ct CO NtDI \/r \ Q VI m \ � 2 \ § / / J & _ e § r 9 to rn 01 , vy , , , Crl tii co on co cn rt co o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Cl } ° ) - § E 90 , 90 90 90 90 90 , 90 F- ,, § \ / § / ( \ , ., 0 U IY DO \ « tcn r-nt v01 \ \ « \ \ / / ( ( tn co Ft] 01 / « \ \ / \ / \ \ \ \ } CO \ , \ \ \ \ \ CO \ \ CO N CC KT 9 / } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }0 0 cC \ \ \ \ \ \ I- \ : \ \ \ a O N o Co a .1 N Co m N ;5`2, T a fr N ,n N Co .-1 Co m N N N N CO N On Co O Co Co a, LO C fn CO I- V1 I� ri V1 lD V1 O Co lD co- O O > 00 O N O Co Cr, O NJ .-1 N a N a N al N V1 Co .y CD 01 V? cr N CO tai} v^1. O'O 0/ v�1. a�/1 01. tai} 011. 1a1i. H L I) w m O N 2 a .+ ° a O V N r 01 Q w 0 0, .n ,n th v, 1 .°.1 N 0 00 .Ni• LII N w m 0 o • cl I, F21 o 7 a 0' D ° o a W n • v v v n n m V .D 8 a 0 co- rn co N Ni u � u v uti i N '0 v V m zr, m Ft 0 a Lri 00- N a` V r+ w m N in Q V r a, o o on 0 N Lc IO 0 m `i W oo Q w h F- CO V) v 8 N CC } 00 a. ke D F- Z a CO N .n I- 7 v u, v- N v. .., .n v, N O "n. } U Z WVI m 01 ri Q J V D n U O n U a M vVi co W v, V1 N uti v, N V, VI. Ori J y1 J O U CO > W V CL a p V D 7 czi w a wi .n tn. .n v< .n .n .., .. .n V v °n°, �° o0 m v a � _ o a m a� .n .n m h CC I .o V V V d Cri ✓ti tn ✓. an +n N of ✓1 V1 R C W m V O N V r ° m o > v m O .n u, v v, v h uti n +i, m Z N m K y La(0 O M b ti , O '^ an v, -V/ an an .n an v, .n h CC• o r m 0 oo 0 o Q ry 2 ry ry ra ry ry ry o ry ,, 1- 01 N e-1 to - N 0 N SCO CO to CO CO M M V to N l^D e-I N t Q N to tD .--1 tD N N IA 1-1 - 03 O O 0 IN N NJ Q O H V 00 to tIf t0 tD 00 M N t0 N M N N V to .-1 01 CO M N O t/1 N N M 00 M 00 N N NJ w� M 1 Ci. N N M Cr- lD Ot n .-1 e-1 1-1 .-I eti .-1 ■e-1 .-1 1-1 U a' >I to to to .n to to tM1 to to to to N 2 7 w 01 ,, — m o. ry n co rti 0 > W H N .n N N N .n N N N vi M a V D to ro tn o co o N Dt ID ul O DI O a co N N N N N N N N N in 01 ry lD O N O m LO M M D ./. .n to .n an N .n V. V, le) V N M Z 1.4 to W I. v O Z ^ M D N Ni N N N N N N to O to u CC JUL N J J QI ko v V N >' .n N. .n .n .R M a V N N N N I- VI DJ 01 Lon °a J w w K 0 O O ¢ N N ° to N Vl N to .n .n N } L/1 w h F- H w z o w J O I- = C e N o re JUL g .n r‘i .,, N. N N N N N N NN J A J o Q } 00 m O 1!1 ¢ a o = a ° •^-1 v w to a LL, .n N .n N N N .n .n N N ,, Q to 2 an M w ' h D v1n n 0 c ^ o Q ' o r ° ° o Z a o o o .n .n to .n .n t., .n ... .n .n ti in 0 ii a v o m o — Cn ... N N N ... N 00 in m a ° co n 2 j m h .n N N N N N N N N v,-°'' I's to to a to m w ro NC ° m o N N N .. N N N N N r w o a o Q>w ry .� ry ry I.-LL � Q p 0 0 V N N a DJ i- cf N ct N 0-, 02 N A N a) 0'IN SN 5 O o N 00 �"r M t: M R N V M ;Z.' N N N N M a V e-1 N N 0 O W N an aA an N an Vf N t' aM1 h N_ > ,_ L U CC 2 co r`J c0 N Q `^ U •■ a) m Q N .n w tn M. o m a cn 7 W N an N w N W Oi h o N Z w N o N .n an 1 + an . , . n N n -I Vl 0 0 a) >- r ti a o . h .n Vi n l■I CO N N NI N an .n N N X Q V-- F- - m O CC M K O V `1 p ci.9 ce p ~ a N ,n u* w v, Vl N v, an cn- lD F- Lc ^ > F- F- z cc N O• < = N cr,U 1a M.' ur .n an .n in an w w w an J -J 0 U a n o o v m o D , R. a a Ce on .n .., .n w .n an .n .n an .n v LL — > N gi O m r N v m Z „i a• V. n n .n .n ,n an .n an M N C. m N 2 , N v V! v W N N VY N Vi 0 O W. K m 2 t. j; vi ti u, vi ,n Vi ut ti of N H Z E V m', N of v 0 M G! .n ... an n .n an N ,n o CI ;,, m w 2 o 0 0 o›- 2 a \ \ \ \ \ \ N o v ry O F- LL ry 2 r, r, r, r-, r, N an a CO ^ m m a ul N Ln Cr CO �- CO e-1 CO m 111 co O al N N co w co OF O N NA N 'y of 1N O ,O 06 O m 00 CI1 ^ 0 0 ^ a N m rn M a NI O_O ¢ N CO Q�l CO O - N m Ul a N O1 w to 1 V N N .-i e I e-I rl W O NI N f' �-- U. N VT AN N VF yt L U w C NI 6 m ° m N 0 c0 N 17 co W ry TI N Q d v. ao to to m loc- to N N ti to N U a ^H V O o N m m cn L n tai N ti 0 a ,n w ta to O1 m U r. r v to ti to to to to N N N N V Cn Z v a ry m 0) V t N 0 .n t., o w to W to m an a v ry CO co CO m N co Q v v ^ w v, h o CO X LU ° ^ Q . v � m a v 2 LU F v o m CC n 7 2 0 I— z= v N V H p a a v m Ni.. Z 2 m 0 w ,n w to N 0 0 U u CC LU >I m J K o m J QI m C N 0 00 co co U to to m W ao to a O co L'.111 N to an v, N Q■ C ry N ti OD Q U 0 0 m Z m CO Q to to V, an to to VF to CC m (70 01 co m Ory S S m t N co m w❑ to V, to an an to v, an to m in m O m , m V V co o N 0 CO Q N N V1 co in N to ao an rl Z N K V d d co OI m 00 oI t^ N an v, N v, v, an to to Cr et O w O N ' a V a o a o LL ry ry m rc o Pc o m m m m 0oN N N N 0p • CO CO 01 tf n Co M cn M b ,-- C, Ql N N t0 c} M O r1 CD O CO V CO ct Co N Co cc 1 o t M N 0 K ti N N N N N N .-1 H N i w to tn. N H ti L U .6 C ni Q n ut .n ti v. rrl U N o N V t0 trl a D N CO' a 0 0 v. u< .n an .n v, N N ti r Co N • N N N an v, ti .n u, l'oi. N 0) Z V N O N m. ut in N N . N N N D <1 co co m �I Ce N N ,, v, v, ,,, N CO w X o (0 .;.:4' n rn Q co H H Y a v, v, uti uv v. vv, v, .n v. '. r+1 1/7 K .n a 7 0 w cc O u ° n a Z to cc Z = o < ... u~ v, v. N tn in v. an yr N N 7 cc h O Q V CI- CC W u " 11 J a m ,, O a m V , v, v. .n v. v, v. v, cn v. v. n N > N K Q .v 0 0 01 V V n a a a v. v, v, v, -v, v, v. v, an - cc m N m .n Ln n o U v. ti v. vl v, N N u N n L NW N o co co o • o cr, or rrri 0• ,r, u m , Z KI VI a pi o v m LT, m V ✓V vi vt th .n .n to v, ml. ✓t N N 0 W cc o a 5`2• 8 o 0 0 0 o Q o LL• ry N N N ry °ry N N 0 2 ry 1-- 01 N O O N 01 N W 01 CA CO V1 N N l!1 V N V F 01 O V N O Ul I-4 V CO N 01 HM 0-1., U) N CO 0 N M 00 m � 01 N M a a > 3 CO LD 01 V 01 O 1 H 0 O H l0 0 C31 O l0 N a>(O w'• O O 00 01 Q1 OH H H lf1 O N 1 T a/} tn. v} '0 v0 W a/} W W "4 ill. L N 0= O-65 v m _ Cr v n a 1° D CJ ry ry a a ° o m La Q N .., N N N N N N N a- 0 ,n 01 N V 01 al cr,D 00 N O cci N o. a N N N N N N N N N Lo yn ^m 01 0 V V ro H V V tn. N N N N N N N N In N 01 V 4 m W N N Lu z N M 01 M CO 01 N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 N a v o - 4-i N -co N N N .n N N N H a Q V �O m, V 0 a 1, co aJ N v v_ 1n N N N N N N N N N `^ H 2 D 0 O 1:?.W D V m 00 co } cO = .0 Ol o V La C K O ~ a N N Z w M D H N N N N N N N N N M O o H U 2 CC 01 U.1 > m o CO J Q 0 M J O M Q 01 La,V m N N N N ao N N N N VY > T co K ry ti n 01 Q Cn O o 01 ., N Z N ,N a N N N N N N N N N N .. w co Do m Y. mi N 0) N V ya XN N N N N N N N an N ri K N 00 0 CO N 01 CO O N N N N 01 an N N N N z m C v CO' .°-. 00 °o - o m VS v O CO •G `" m 01 � w o, O N N N 01 N m V, C Q 0 o 0 O Q• VI °o a 0 r, N i, : O ya o y-,-_ ry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry o F- ti I Q ,a CO to r1 M O 1ff N IN N M N IN .-f M Qf <, a N O 1IJ 1n CO 1 Cii a Cr, O Q1 N CO l0 N V W •_• 'C ke 10 N 00 N UI fD M 10 ti r N Q O C W ti N rat N N C N N w VF in l/I V1 N V1 to vs N N N > .0 c6 0= 2 W Q N N N N U VI y~j CO 0 T Cr La rrr,l, v no o N N o N 1n > m N o � h W N1 M ti , N W M N N 0-1 h 0 n 0 N Z V N. n h w ti w N 1T N 00 >, M C N h N N h N VI W N X ' Q I- I- (A J U S CC• KI V m O Q m N O ., .,, .., .., .., ., .,, ti I— Q VI- >. I- Z r O• - a V Cr N o Q c 0 WN N to ti N H V, V, Vim~} J J 0 V > ri. al w a °m ti , v, v, v, ID tl N > a C.C W Q M O a o O N Z N or ,m Cr 0 Cr m co a Cr ry ,n 0, ° ° 0i co,. 01 WO ti M ti h H VI C m •-I Lrc' C71 Lo cn N 01 0. v, .n v1 vl v, .n v, .n VD Z h E 0l 01 °m m m v O O v u .� ti O 05 , k1:1 0 N K O La O Q O W U O O T O Q F LL 0 N 0 ry 0 0 N ry 0 0 0 n I- N CO N 01 N N Cr r-1 CO V CO N N N '-I Ln L .0 CO - (U m V '-1 lD CO O N '~-I N 0 N V' CF. N N to lD Ql N N (N f1 O .1 V1 . 'i e-1 r-1 N 'i '-I V1 tM1 V1 V1 to V1 V1 V1 tM1 H _N W rl L N ` Cr ITS CI) h v1 +n +n a 2 ,- CO o w V '^ W ( F Q w .-1 V W j N n a o N O - ti N N an '1 Q to 0 J N .n v, w v. .n ,n h m to Z o 7 w m m a N In ■t Q PI O 0 2 ti . 0 an .n .n v. v X Q F- L') Y N K 2: g .. m n Q 0 O W CO m N m W V1 F G } O Z _ Z D w O U m 51 ^ N m O 0, CL 2 2 in W in N W ■1 J -I 0 U ¢ O V In Q V o V 0 m '" .n .n .n m m an .n .n '^ co- LL in- .CI N N Q V m V V Z I,. v an m G m N N N N N In . m n r. m oo N w a M n O KI m ct O to W Ino v. an v. .n .n v. W v �,• O In Z K ti CO m a m CO O riDi (0 w N In in in In .n ''' v An o. '^ z a Ul > 0 0 0 o Q Ti ry '-LL n N r‘, r, ry n ry V r-, fr Q CO O N V 0 CO 01 0 In N 00 I- 00 V 1,1 N t0 ID O .-1 00 CD m O 00 M M 1� In I, OO M e-1 O H O M 111 Ill M Cl V O 111 01 O 0 - N O V1 Cl M N 01 111 0 CO N N O_O N .1 N N N M M CF 111 N N N O i 'n CO Un m O .-i Co N m O 1 0 F v '- Co co n m N .r N m ul Co W CO N -1 CO CO Co m r VI. m 4 c} 00 ."� O O 00 00 LID O O -+ p O m m I, . N CO 1�N O W N N N .- .-i .-1 N N N .-I N W vT ,/", W Ni- W Ni- VF Ni- Ni- -N CL L U w Co Ili m cc v o co CJ — m oo Q > w v U �I VT N V N .p N CO . co W O O N V O W v10 vrvni Co Q an ,n ,n an ,n an ,n V1 >N N a > m co LC2i v v ce 0 V WI- m o m Z a 10 d Co v 7 N Q V 10 n CC X • an m '^ ,n an `^ ,n an an VY Q F- N N J a▪ o O n a0 0 0 Q N an ,n an an ,n ,n an ,n vrn • ro cc cf, co >- F- Z Q Z 7 Co m 'ai col H col O U Og N V C • W C .--i 1p ai cc 2 V N ro co Co N w N w an ,n N ,n Co J aR -I 0 v m,1 � o m o m Q O O m ° W al v , m ti,. „ ,n w ,n an ,n an an ,n N io V} CO sr> 0 a Cr 0 z CO a a, an N ,n an ,n an an an ,n ,iii rj K O, co CI 01 m rry m ✓ N OW ,n N an W V, to ,n +n N CO A COI N > m st v, ro v ro a ul in m m O an an an an an an .i■ an an an V Z VT m m ry■ crl m o n G o o • an an an .n an an an an in an m w m ro o °0 0 0 o Q LL i ry °ry 1,1 ry r, o 2 ry ry ry Or '..n/ Ol N ■i CO e•1 .-I O N N 01 CO CO CO m M V CO N CO W LO VJ CO IQ- N CO CO '-I CO N N CO '-1 N O� V 00 V1 111 lO lO 00 M 0 N O 0 01 N 01 V CO 1-1 01 00 01 CO N N 13. O M N IN M 00 m CO e•i e-1 00 N m V V N N M V O 01 CO' CV a' 00 w .--1 e•1 c-1 N N e-I •-1 .--1 v--1 N ,-, r- > N CO CO iR CO CO CO CO CO CO L m U [0 w co � m m o N n- oi m N co°J r o w an kl N> l0 2 Q W l n .U N an ul VT m I- v a 10 CC N O V M n O 1 N ti N Ol O l7 O N 01 O o0 O m tr 7 r vOO CO .~.1 Q v, v1 N v N V) N W CC > Ol J l0 O ~Q > N O O 01 on ,_,CO.W W m .r D O OV N O w m lD J N CO o o. N v Vl N v) VT ✓1 LO Z CO CO Y m X a m a m .-1 Q N o o ro ° CO Ln W V n O .1'4 .p `0 00 SI.On ..°li .Oil O m O In 2 W J N V O o N rn on m m ti � 10 V La Q rt Loi. US C V N CO X J N N vl V1 in v) vl N v, .y a Q v., W cn CC Z .-I n O r p N cc CJ N US 2 D O O ^✓O W V ■1- N O V 8.an O .n yr .n vl .n .n vl v N J y F F Z O W v F— a ti N m p O I l' N V 2 MI m o co Q Y o m V W Cc u} .n ✓ u v, n N yr .n N N J d u J L.I CC > on O in N CO n, m ro o o 00 \ s m L.n o v m ce av O m o .D O O1 K CT a 2 Q m U '" o m N ^ m m Q N co ,O CO V ,O 1f■ O N O O O N O0-)V D Z O cz ..r .., vl vl to .n yr u* v, •n .y O O o Z w o v ry o o N N 01 Ln O 2 O O V us m V V to w ur u• vl V, H N O Ql Z CW C F- C 01 cr Lot; w m O N o Q ,r- Owl .y V p a LD V Q O lD N ,0 N n N co o CO Z V v N V VT lP w m n m O ao V co Ol W co O, co to Le O m v m ry it v m m N W Kr Ln 0 '^ Vl an -In in -m- in VI. vti v) n . {n CC O r, V N W O O O O .~-■ m •• > O O O O O O O O o Q iN \ aj N 0, N \ 01 ti O o 0 n O O N 0 0 ~ LL N N N N CAC March 12,2015 VIII-1 New Business 1 of 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Out-of-Cycle Fund 195 Category D Grant Application from the City of Naples for an Additional Funding Request for the Naples Pier Rebuild for a not to exceed amount of $571,965, recommend that the Board reallocate tourist development tax funds with a supermajority vote, approve an amendment to the Grant Agreement approve necessary budget amendment, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To approve additional funding for the Naples Pier Rebuild for a not to exceed amount of$571,965. CONSIDERATIONS: On June 10, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners approved a grant application that requested the Category "D" FY 2013-14 funding ($200,000) committed to a Naples Pier Deck replacement project be retained, rolled-over and combined with a new Category "D" FY 2014-15 application requesting an additional $692,449. The request was based on a preliminary estimate provided by AD Morgan Company of Tampa, Florida, resulting from structural evaluation conducted in February 2014. On June 11, 2014, a contract was awarded by the City to TKW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $98,718 for the structural design and engineering services for the project. City Council was advised the City would seek the services of a Construction Management at Risk for the project. Manhattan Construction Inc. was selected the most qualified firm for the pier project and will receive a $65,000 flat fee for execution of this contract. Project costs determined by Manhattan Construction, Inc. exceed the previously approved TDC and BCC Funding of$892,449, increasing by an additional cost of$571,965. A new out of cycle grant request has been prepared seeking consideration for additional TDC funding for the unfunded balance of the project cost. Should the project be completed at a cost less than the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) of $1,464,414, the City would only seek funding reimbursement for the actual costs incurred. The City of Naples has also agreed not to seek additional Category D Pier funding until the actual costs of the pier rebuild is recouped at a rate of$200,000 per year per Category D funding guidelines. FISCAL IMPACT: A budget amendment in the amount of $571,965 from TDC Beach Renourishment Fund (195) reserves will be required. The additional funds will increase Naples Pier project 90096 from $892,449 to $1,464,414. The recoupment period at $200,000 per year will be extended to approximately 6.3 years. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of the item. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-1 New Business 2 of 2 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: On July 8, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners amended the tourist development tax ordinance, No. 92-60, as amended, to provide: "Notwithstanding anything to contrary herein, the Board of County Commissioners may reallocate funds between the above-defined Categories (A—D) with an affirmative vote of a majority plus one additional member of the Board of County Commissioners." Ordinance No. 14-30 Section. The Board of County Commissioners may approve this additional funding with four affirmative votes to reallocate the funds from Category "A" for beaches to Category "D" for pier repair and maintenance. The Executive Summary to the Board will need to seek approval to reallocate the funding, to approve the additional funding, and to authorize an amendment to the grant agreement. RECOMMENDATION: That the CAC and TDC approves an Out-of-Cycle Fund 195 Category D Grant Application from the City of Naples for an Additional Funding Request for the Naples Pier Rebuild for a not to exceed amount of $571,965, recommends that the Board reallocate tourist development tax funds with a supermajority vote, approve an amendment to the Grant Agreement, approve necessary budget amendment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Department Attachments: A) Grant Application; B) Grant Amendment CAC March 12,2015 VIII-1*New Business 1 of 3 Contract Amendment #1 "2014 Tourism Agreement between Collier County and the City of Naples for FY 14/15 Category "A" City of Naples Projects" This amendment, dated this day of , 2015 to the referenced agreement shall be by and between the parties to the original Agreement, City of Naples (to be referred to as "Grantee") and Collier County, Florida, (to be referred to as "Grantor"). Statement of Understanding RE: Contract "2014 Tourism Agreement between Collier County and the City of Naples for FY 14/15 Category "A" City of Naples Projects" In order to continue the services provided for in the original Contract document referenced above, the City of Naples agrees to amend the Contract as per Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference or by the modified language below. RECITALS: WHEREAS, CITY submitted applications for Category "A" Tourist Development Tax Funds in the aggregate amount of eight hundred fifty-three thousand three hundred seventy-one dollars ($853.371.00) for the City of Naples Projects for fiscal year 2014-2015, as described in Exhibit "A" and attachments A-1 Beach Maintenance and A-2 Naples Pier. This approval authorizes eight hundred fifty-three thousand three hundred seventy-one dollars ($853,371.00) to this Agreement(the "Projects"); and WHEREAS, this Agreement specifically authorizes the City to carry forward the $200,000 funding awarded in the FY 2013/2014 Grant Agreement to be added to the City's request for FY 2014/2015 bringing the total award for the City of Naples Pier Major Renovation to $892,000; and WHEREAS, CITY submitted an out of cycle grant application on March 5, 2015 seeking an additional $571,965 for the City of Naples Pier Major Renovation (Exhibit"A"); and WHEREAS, CITY'S request for additional funding brings the total award for the City of Naples Major Pier Renovation to $1,464,414; and [09.0031/1159934/11 1 CAC March 12.2015 VIII-1*New Business 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to provide this additional funding; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to fund the Projects) as serving valid and worthwhile public purpose and finds that these project expenditures promote tourism. x xx xxx 2. PAYMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT. The aggregate maximum reimbursement under this Agreement shall be eight hundred fifty three thousand-three htmdred seventy one-delars 4853,371.003-one million four hundred sixty-four thousand and four hundred fourteen dollars ($1,464,414). The GRANTEE is authorized to use an additional $200,000 for the major renovation of the Naples Pier as awarded in the 2013/2014 Grant Agreement. This amendment incorporates the additional $571,965 requested on or about March 5, 2015. This brings this year's total grant award to $1,464,414. GRANTEE shall be paid in accordance with the fiscal procedures of COUNTY upon submittal of invoices and upon verification that the services described in the invoice are completed or that goods have been received. 2.1 GRANTEE shall determine that the goods and services have been properly provided and shall submit invoices to the County Manager or his designee. The County Manager, or his designee, shall determine that the invoice payments are authorized and the goods or services covered by such invoice have been provided or performed in accordance with such authorization. The budget for each project, revised budget for the Major Pier Renovation is attached in Exhibit "A," shall constitute authorization of the expenditure described in the invoices provided that such expenditure is made in accordance with this Agreement. ***** 2.3 GRANTEE shall be paid for its actual cost not to exceed the maximum amount budgeted pursuant to the attached Exhibit "A" revised budget for the Major Pier Renovation. [09.0031/1159934/1] 2 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-1*New Business 3 of 3 ****** 16. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may only be amended in writing by mutual agreement of the parties and after recommendation by the Tourist Development Council. The reallocation of funds in the Tourist Development Tax ordinance, No. 92-60, as amended, requires supermajority vote of the Board of County Commissioners for approval. ****** Note: Language deleted has been struck hretig#. New language has been underlined. All other terms and conditions of the agreement shall remain in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, have executed this Amendment on the date(s) indicated below. Accepted: , 20 Dwight E. Brock, Clerk OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY: OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Contractor's First Witness: By: Tim Nance, Chairman By: Signature GRANTEE: CITY OF NAPLES Print Name By: Contractor's Second Witness: Signature By: Signature Hon. John F. Sorey Mayor City of Naples Print Name Approved as to Form and Legality: Assistant County Attorney [09.0031/1159934/1] 3 March 12, 1015 VIII-1" New Business Exhibit"A" 1 of 8 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATION 2015 Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Naples Pier Deck Replacement and Structural Renovation Additional Request (Project Title) 1. Name and Address of Project Sponsor Organization: City Of Naples 735 Eighth Street South Naples, Florida 34102 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone: Name: David Lykins, CSD Director Address: 280 Riverside Circle City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34102 Phone: 239/213-7110 FAX: 239/213-7130 Other: dlykinsa©naplesgov.com 3. Organization's Chief Elected Official and Title: Hon. John F. Sorey III Mayor— City of Naples 4. Details of Project - Description and Location: Description: The City of Naples requests consideration for a new, out-of-cycle TDC funding request to capture a funding shortfall for major renovations to the Naples Pier. The project includes labor and material for the replacement of the stringers, deck, railings, fasteners, lighting, utility and communication lines at the Naples Pier. The preliminary and estimated cost of the project prior to actual design and consultation with a construction manager and sub-contractors was $892,449. The replacement of deck boards and railings will consist of IPE wood. The replacement of the steel angles, bolts, nuts, washers, clips, straps and fasteners will include the use of stainless steel hardware. On March 19, 2014, the City submitted a grant application, supported by Collier County, requesting that Category "A" FY 2013-14 funding ($200,000) committed to a Naples Pier deck replacement project be retained, rolled-over and combined with a new Category "A" FY 2014-15 application requesting an additional $692,449. The initially requested funding was based on a preliminary estimate provided by the AD Morgan Company of Tampa, Florida, resulting from a structural evaluation conducted in February 2014. This estimate was proposed prior to completion of any design documents and vendor or subcontractor review. The project was placed on the April 10, 2014 Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee meeting, the April 16, 2014 Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting, the April 28, 2014 Tourist Development Council meeting and the June 10, 2014 Board of County Commissioners meeting. All three advisory boards and the BOCC unanimously approved the request and Tourist Development Council Funding in the amount of$892,449. On June 11, 2014, a contract was awarded by the City to TKW Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $98,718 for the structural design and engineering services for the project. City Council was advised the City would seek the services of a Construction Management at Risk for the project. March 12. 1015 VIII-1*" New Business Exhibit"A" 2 of 8 Collier County 'ir>urixu L)ei•ciohntc'urt Cuta}c'll CalCgni:1 "1" Grant Application - I'ugc 2 Manhattan Construction Inc. was selected as the most qualified firm for the pier project. Manhattan Construction Inc. was recently used by Collier County for the construction of the first phase of the Gordon River Greenway, including the use of !PE lumber. First hand observation gives staff confidence that Manhattan will successfully manage the pier project. Based on TKW's engineered specifications, combined with Manhattan's considerable experience, staff anticipates and expects a quality result. The fee negotiated between the City and Manhattan Construction Inc., per CCNA guidelines, is a flat fee of $65,000. The fee equates to approximately 5% of the estimated construction and deliverables portion of the project allocated at $1,297,242, and is considered fair and reasonable for the anticipated scope of work. The contract provides for a performance bond, contractor liability insurance, and $70,000 in a contingency and allowance fee. The Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), including all costs is $1,464,414. Project costs determined by Manhattan Construction, Inc. exceed the previously approved TDC funding of $892,449, increasing by an additional cost of $571,965. A new, out of cycle grant request has been prepared seeking consideration for additional TDC funding for the unfunded balance of the project cost. Should the project be completed at a cost less than the GMP of $1,464,414, the City would only seek funding reimbursement for the actual costs incurred. The Pier is a public access beach facility as a tourist attractor and destination. The Pier provides shoreline erosion control and beach preservation effect. Additionally, the public safety through the continued maintenance of the Pier is of paramount importance, and includes responsibility and public safety of Pier structure, deck, restrooms and storage facilities as well as water and electrical systems related to the Pier's use as a fishing, tourist and beach preservation structure. The Naples City Pier captures out-of-county and local visitor well as tourist populations from through-out the region and world. The Pier, a historically significant structure originally constructed in 1887, serves as a public access beach facility, as a major tourist attraction and vacation destination. The Pier is open to the public 24 hours a day, seven days per week. The Naples Pier captures out-of-county and local visitors well as tourist populations from through- out the region and world. Recent annual Pier visitation data captured by the City reflects the following: 2012 — 1,031,242 2013 — 1,070,545 2014 — 1,104,953 March 12, 1015 VIII-1" New Business Exhibit"A" 3 of 8 Collier County 'Tourist t)cvelohnien, Council C'utc'uory "/1" Grunt/1i1lllicrtiiort - f'ii 3 Location: The project location is at the 12 Avenue—South terminus beach end. Please refer to Project Location Map found in the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section attached. 5. Estimated project start date: July 6, 2015 6. Estimated project duration: Sept. 30, 2015 7. Total TDC Tax Funds $1,464,414 8, Ifthe full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes () No (X) PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM ELEMENT AMOUNT TDC Funds Requested- New Request $ _571,965 FY 2013-14 Carryover $200,000* FY 2014-15 In-place TDC Funding $ 692,449 Approved Funding $_892,449 State of Florida N/A Share Federal Share N/A TOTAL $1,464,414 `$200,000 was allocated in FY 2013-14 for deck replacement authorized as a carryover and combined with subsequent requests. PROJECT EXPENSES (Engineering, Mobilization, Contracting, etc.) Additional New Request $571,965 TOTAL $1,464,414 I have read the Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Funding Policy covering beach renourishment and pass maintenance and agree that my organization will comply with all guidelines and criteria. 3/5715 Signature of Sponsor Organization's Chief Official Date March 12, 1015 VIII-1"* New Business Exhibit"A" 4 of 8 C„ollicr C'ornlf • 7nuriq Dcrrc�lopnu iit Council Catc,ecu.r '1" Grunt.1pplirutiorr 1 ut i 4 ADDITIONAL INF0RMATLaiJ_ ELIG IBILITY: Beach Maintenance activities will take place on beach area that are least 80°,4, classified as eligible under the TDC guidelines. The project boundary location is from southernmost State perm fitted beach cleaning area within the City's jurisdictional boundary to Claris Pass in Collier County. ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY: The City of Naples will be the primary recipient and lead agency for controlling and completing all aspects and activities proposed in this grant application. The City will remain the lead agency for the duration of funding and will be the sole paint of contact for all matters related to this proposal The City has the managerial and financial capability to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project descri bed in this application. BUDGET ASSURANCES: Dual Compensation: !fa City project staff member or consultant is involved simultaneously in two or more projects, the staff will not be compensated for more than 100% of their time for any such dual involvement. PROJECT LOCATION MAP: k � .w"+.+�„ `e' er i 4 f H k,' 0, r4 4 v !fi, 11C �- iv if '-',,'-' .'. ,'1°*".f.,..4':?.4'fIr ' 31 i ` f t.� � * '': %I. • ry te r r .."0 So \ iff, � t , ; •.:,ai _ , ,, 1� March 12, 1015 VIII-1** New Business Exhibit"A" 5 of 8 Manhattan Construction,Inc Exhibit Fi-1::Baste of Compensator; RFQ 15004 Conatrvdian Manager at Risk Pier Renovation 1 of 4 February 20,2015 Mr.David Lylcins City of Naples 280 Riverside Circle Naples,FL 34102 RE: Naples Pier Restoration Dear Mr.Lylcins: We are pleased to provide you with the GMP for the Naples Pier Restoration project which includes the removal and replacement of the existing pier superstructure and associated plumbing and electrical. This OMP is based upon the bid documents dated 2/16/15 from TKW Consulting Engineers Inc. and our clarification and assumptions. Coat of the Naples Pier Restoration .51,464,414.00 If you have any questions,please feel free to call. Sincerely yours, MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION Brett Martin Project Manager In E) CD 15 V v- CD 15 N N `- CD f) g C liqing0 !§ § W PP !MingPt § 8411 0 ' = 5 8 i i I c cu c= t I .. a. . . A CU a rt Z 1 I I 46 .Z.' 0 -- .0 1 1ff Z 2 t 1 rq cl 3 . 1 el _ " AliMpAFI ! 1 fi !APAEini $ 6 i " l'it J ,-- r5 It 12 1 11 / HDInlini i iin56inn61 g In 2-. q 2 2Rg L1.1 9 ---I l- I & & * ,(2). . . . . . . mm 1 A A r, k 1 1 8 i 11 d Jwilg 1 ; 0 ,.., i ,,, t:i. I 1 -2 E i ;I 111-14 11 „ ph ; Ifil .,., 2 1 4.,„:„ I illtkliti / x ! 1R1WP / IA Illifilii ilfl liat_ giklift4li ill, I 'll , IiiiiO4 ,0MY IAIr 4 ,._,:, ! AtAlmiih , _ . ,x &. pe ' i 1811 § E M " Pi IAMOWIT010 nglif g OJVQ8Gt8S5gEsE -#.. IlEasassusA8Sbl jcii55 -t L.r) yA 00 (Nr D V) -5 c) „ 0 1, 11111M 1511 , ..r = 0 I c a, ...., cC s.., al I 1 1 I r I in A 15 a) g § 12. & g. 1i 1 m 5 1 Z ID 1 a I i 1 1 3 . I ci. i i 11111Ag I Irt. g g iv •s-5 al it L.11 e6 r--. ' ■ ItiI r.1 1,1 4.1 . *4 .4 t-I . I 1.* 1 .4 ..:.„,..: 1 IP ig 1 -4 t I I I a _ I fil I i ,:i: / 1- 1111! 111 ,,,, A ,,,, cg I !ii , iiiiii, 11112'11 h ' .'e 1 i IX I / 11° a I. 2 8111 . II 1, 7.r,:, 1 1 8 1 March 12, 1015 VIII-1" New Business Exhibit"A" 8 of 8 Manhattan Construction,Inc. Exhibit B-1 ::Basis of Compensation RFQ 15-004 Construction Manager at Risk Pier Renovation 4 of 4 F , r Standard Estimate Report Description Sub Totals % Labor $ 435,882 34% Material $ 567,500 44% Subcontract $ 293,860 23% Other $ $ 1,297,242 $ 1,297,242 Material Tait $ 34,050 6.00% Labor Burden Included 58% $ . $ 1,297,242 Builder's Risk Insurance $ 9,859 0.76% ilon;shnremen's insurance $ 1,297 0.10% General Liability insurance $ 10,637 0.81% $ 21,794 $ 1,319,036 ...... ......_ CM Continge $ 50,000 Aliowences $ 20,000 $ 70,000 $ 1,389,035 Bond:Ps mr nt&Performance $ 10,378 1111.111111111111111 0.t4 $ 10,378 C.M. (Fixed Fee) $ 65,000 . 5 00% $ 65,000 $ 1,464,414 Total; $ 1,464,414 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2 New Business 1 of 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to accept a proposal from CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering dated March 10,2015 for Collier Creek Dredging Project Design,Permitting and Bid Assistance, approve a work order under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ for a not to exceed amount of $68,845.90, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute Work Order, authorize necessary budget amendment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To authorize approved of proposal from CB&I for Collier Creek Dredging Project Design, Permitting and Bid Assistance. CONSIDERATIONS: The Feasibility Study to identify the current issues and potential solutions at the Collier Creek entrance was completed by Coastal Planning and Engineering/CBI in February 2015. Capri Pass meets the Marco River on the north side of Marco Island in Collier County, Florida and is flanked to the east by the Ville de Marco West condominium (VDMW) and to the west by a terminal jetty on Marco Point, the eastern end of Hideaway Beach. This creek is used by local boaters to access Collier Bay, residences and the Esplanade Shoppes on Smokehouse Bay. Residents of Marco Island have raised concerns to Collier County about the safety of boaters navigating through Collier Creek's entrance and the amount of scouring that is occurring at the VDMW seawall and docks. As sand migrates east from Hideaway beach, it is overtopping the terminal jetty and infilling the already narrowing entrance to Collier Creek. Collier Creek meets the Marco River at a right angle and strong currents from the River are creating turbulence along the eastern side of the Creek entrance at VDMW. Through detailed survey, reconnaissance level investigations, public testimony and a cursory engineering analysis of the area, CB&I developed several potential solutions to stabilize this bay inlet. 1. Enlarge Entrance Channel to Equilibrium Cross Section 2. Move Terminal Jetty West 3. Remove Terminal Jetty 4. Adjust the Terminal Jetty 5. Modify Dredging Practices 6. Coastal Structures to Realign and Streamline the Creek Further to the West 7. Constrain the Flow in Collier Creek In most probability, the successful solution to a stabilize Collier Creek will most likely employ a combination of solutions listed above. To assure the correct combination, a numerical modeling study is recommended. This study will however require time to execute and validate. Due to safety concerns, Collier Creek will need to be stabilized first through dredging to allow sufficient time for the most effective solution to be identified. The modeling effort will be able to provide additional assurances in the chosen structural and sediment management modifications, prior to construction. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2 New Business 2 of 2 The attached proposal from Coastal Planning and Engineering/CBI will provide the engineering and permitting needed to obtain a Notice-to-Proceed (NTP) from FDEP to proceed with the dredging. This approach will stabilize the inlet for a sufficient period of time to allow the proper investigation and modeling to occur and to assure the proper long term solution. There is a history of utilizing Tourist Development Tax (TDC) funds to maintain this inlet. This inlet was dredged in 2001 and 2012 and a terminal jetty was installed in 2005 using TDC hinds. Dredged sand will be pumped and placed to the public Central Marco beaches to eliminate ponding and improve drainage. Thirty percent(30%) to forty percent(40%) of the Marco Island boat traffic use this inlet to access the Gulf and public marina at Smokehouse Bay. FISCAL IMPACT: A budget amendment moving funds in the amount of$68,845.90 from "MC Beach Renourishment Fund (195) Reserves to the Collier Creek Dredging Feasibility project 90064 will be required. The Collier Creek Dredging project budget will be increased from $59,807.44 to $128,653.34. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this item. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Pass and inlet maintenance is an authorized expenditure pursuant to the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended. This item requires the TDC to make a recommendation as to whether the expenditure promotes tourism. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. - CMG RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to accept a proposal from CB&1 Coastal Planning & Engineering dated March 10, 2015 for Collier Creek Dredging Project Design, Permitting and Bid Assistance, approve a work order under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ for a not to exceed amount of $68,845.90, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute Work Order, authorize necessary budget amendment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Department Attachments: Proposal CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2`New Business 1 of 31 DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY COLLIER CREEK COLLIER COUNTY, FL ! - t .y,F�1-Mfar � �'w Y= • `•• ilit_k_at,4 • tilt -sat y _ Photo Courtesy of Sun Times 10-18-2014 Prepared for: Coastal Zone Management Department Collier County,Florida Prepared by: CB&I Coastal Planning&Engineering,Inc. February 2015 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 2 of 31 DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY COLLIER CREEK COLLIER COUNTY, FL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The primary objectives of this study are to identify the current issues at the Collier Creek entrance and to identify potential solutions. The area of concern is the entrance to Collier Creek which meets the Marco River on the north side of Marco Island in Collier County, Florida and will focus on the area from monument 1-1-14 (near the easternmost T-groin) east to II-16. The Creek entrance is flanked to the east by the Ville de Marco West condominium (VDMW) and to the west by a terminal jetty on Marco Point, the eastern end of Hideaway Beach. This creek is used by local boaters to access Collier Bay, residences and the Esplanade Shoppes on Smokehouse Bay. Residents of Marco Island have raised concerns to Collier County about the safety of boaters navigating through Collier Creek's entrance and the amount of scouring that is occurring at the VDMW seawall and docks. As sand migrates east from Hideaway beach, it is overtopping the terminal jetty and infilling the already narrowing entrance to Collier Creek. Collier Creek meets the Marco River at a right angle and strong currents from the River are creating turbulence along the eastern side of the Creek entrance at VDMW. CB&I conducted site visits and a reconnaissance level field investigation to identify the current conditions of this area and recorded that turbulent conditions are present at the Creek's entrance in the hours around peak tides and are stronger on incoming tides. Through cursory engineering analysis of this area, CB&I presents several potential solutions in this feasibility study. I. Enlarge Entrance Channel to Equilibrium Cross Section 2. Move Terminal Jetty West 3. Remove Terminal Jetty 4. Adjust the Terminal Jetty 5. Modify Dredging Practices 6. Coastal Structures to Realign and Streamline the Creek Further to the West 7. Constrain the Flow in Collier Creek It is recommended that alternatives 1, 2 4 and 5 be implemented to improve inlet performance. Prior to adjusting the terminal jetty, a numerical modeling study is recommended. The modeling effort will be able to provide additional assurances in the chosen structural and sediment management modifications, prior to construction. If the jetty cannot be moved sufficiently west, then removal of the terminal jetty should be considered. Early coordination with FDEP and State Lands is essential, prior to selecting the final configuration. CB&I COASTAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 3 of 31 DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY COLLIER CREEK COLLIER COUNTY, FL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION I 2.0 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY 2.1 Historic Engineering of Collier Creek 3 2.2 Historic Beach Nourishment/Engineering at Hideaway Beach 3 2.3 Historic Aerial Review S 3.0 SITE VISIT 5 4.0 SURVEY METHODS 5 5.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS 7 5.1 Description of Data Utilized for Analysis 7 5.2 Channel Cross Section Analysis 7 5.3 Volumetric Change Analysis 8 5.4 Channel Currents Analysis 11 5.5 Inlet Stability Analysis 12 5.6 Sediment Quality Analysis 13 6.0 COASTAL PROCESSES ANALYSIS 14 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 15 8.0 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT 19 9.0 GOVERNMENT PROCESS 23 10.0. RECOMMENDATIONS 24 11.0 REFERENCES 26 List of Figures Figure No. Figure 1. Project Location Map 2 Figure 2. CB&I Survey Vessel in Collier Creek 6 Figure 3. Delta Plot 2005 vs. 2014 10 Figure 4. Plot of Measured and Predicted Tides 11 Figure 5. Currents Plotted in Cross Section 12 Figure 6. Sample Locations 14 Figure 7. Environmental Resources 16 Figure 8. Jetty Relocation Alternative "1 List of Tables Table No. 1. Survey Control 5 2. Profile Station Control 6 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 4 of 31 DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY COLLIER CREEK COLLIER COUNTY, FL TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. Volume Changes December 2005 to December 2014 9 4. December 2014 Channel Area Below 0 ft. NAVD 13 5. Sediment Quality Summary 13 List of Appendices Appendix No. A. Stakeholder Meeting Minutes B. Historic Aerial Photographs C. Field Observation Report D. Certified Survey Drawings E. Profile Plots F. Granularmetric Reports &Grain Size Distribution Curves nl CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 5 of 31 D RA FT FEASIBILITY STUDY COLLIER CREEK COLLIER COUNTY, FL 1.0 INTRODUCTION The primary objectives of this study are to identify the current issues at the Collier Creek entrance and to identify potential solutions. The area of concern is the entrance to Collier Creek which meets the Marco River on the north side of Marco Island in Collier County, Florida and will focus on the area from monument H-14 (near the easternmost T-groin) east to H-16. Residents of Marco Island have raised concerns to Collier County about the safety of boaters navigating through Collier Creek's entrance and the amount of scouring that is occurring at the Ville de Marco West condominium (VDMW) seawall and docks. As sand migrates east from Hideaway beach, it is overtopping the terminal jetty and infilling the already narrowing entrance to Collier Creek. Collier Creek meets the Marco River at a right angle and strong currents from the River are creating turbulence along the eastern side of the Creek entrance at VDM W. CB&1 conducted site visits and a reconnaissance level field investigation to identify the current conditions of this area and recorded that turbulent conditions are present at the Creek's entrance in the hours around peak tides and are stronger on incoming tides. Through cursory engineering analysis of this area, CB&I presents several potential solutions in this feasibility study. Further analysis and modeling are recommended before implementing a solution. 2.0 BACKGROUND AND IIISTORY Collier Creek is located on the north side of Marco Island and connects the Collier Bay to the Gulf of Mexico via the Marco River (Figure 1). The Creek entrance is flanked to the east by VDMW and to the west by a terminal jetty on Marco Point, the eastern end of Hideaway Beach. The Creek is subject to twice daily tides (semidiurnal) and is generally protected from waves by Hideaway Beach and Capri Pass Shoals. This creek is used by local boaters to access Collier Bay, residences and the Esplanade Shoppes on Smokehouse Bay. Recently, sand has been overtopping the terminal jetty and infilling the entrance to Collier Creek. Narrowing of the channel and increased currents have made navigation difficult through the Creek at certain times of day. To keep the Creek open for navigation in the past, dredging and the construction of a terminal jetty on the western shore of the entrance have been implemented. After review of historic permits and interviews with stakeholders, a brief history of the engineering of the Collier Creek area has been compiled and is presented below. Notes from the stakeholder meetings and interviews can be found in Appendix A. 1 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2'New Business 6 of 31 DRAFT rl "i - ,�,'' A:I-. y>, Y 0 200 400 `r ' Feet ‘71.1.1.;..!/.._.--' • M Arco •"` . � .N Island""kil ., . /., Cks� d:y �.Y *:e1*:i "L., a r .. Gulf k °G'�"`` �' r Marco of Mexico River NTS � k' C-1 0 °'■.....,4ii 4.-- "", and' C-2 t _, ill„ed , ..444....k Maro est .• ''; ) �,, . .. 15.6g H 16 ',T.* ; a 46,4 x x �` _� . 1-1-14 2r• .K. t0H_16H 16 - '+'r�-. !� , =,-n ` , " . , 7L" A , H-13 <•1 . *- Marco Point is t•>.M ,4 .s S. C-81 IA 4 P ' SI ' ; n t C 9 T i. t ^_ 1►y `i x ,F., O C 10 ' . fi�t cQi t .,„ 04 v i /-1-3',••v / ': � 1 Notes: Legend: 1. Coordinates are in feet based on the • Profile Stations Florida State Plane Coordinate System, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983(NAD 83). State Parks and Recreational Lands 2. 2014 aerial photography provided by Collier Property Appraiser's Parcels Collier County, date flown December 18& 19, 2013. Figure 1. Project Location Map 2 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 7 of 31 I)RAFT 2.1 Historic Engineering of Collier Creek March 2001: Major permit modification to 11-2934539. Permitted dredging of the entrance channel to Collier Bay (aka Collier Creek) and installation of two additional temporary (geotextile) T-groins on Hideaway Beach (at H-2 and H-11). May — July 2001: Dredged to -10 ft. NVGD. Approximately 24,100cy of sand dredged and placed between H-10 and H-I2 on north Hideaway Beach. 2001-2003: VDMW replacement of seawall and 10 finger piers and installation of concrete armor mat and sheet pile toe wall. January 2005: Permit no. 0222764-001-JC approved for beach nourishment on Hideaway Beach and construction of 10 permanent T-groins (replacing 7 geotextile structures) and a terminal jetty. Permit includes approval for dredging of approximately 240,000cy from Big Marco Pass ebb shoal. May 2005: Permit modification 0222764-003-EM. Jetty design modified by lengthening the north end by 33 feet and shortening the south end by 33 feet. The bend in the structure is to remain at the originally permitted location, The purpose of the jetty was to extend the longevity of the beach fill and reduce the frequency of beach nourishment intervals. However, the beach at the jetty site has recently accreted, such that if the jetty were constructed as originally permitted, the structure would be located almost entirely upland of the 0.0' contour. Shifting the location and configuration of the jetty to fit the new shoreline will allow the structure to achieve the design intent. The modified jetty design lies within the borders of the easement granted by the state. December 2005: Terminal jetty construction completed. I36,350cy placed at South Point (T-128 to 1-I-4) and 180,420cy placed at Royal Marco Point (H-9 to H-13). 10 permanent T-groins constructed, 5 in each area, and a terminal jetty at Collier Creek entrance. August 2011: Permit no. 0305112-001-JC approved dredging of approximately 12,000cy from Collier Creek entrance to maximum cut elevation of-12.3 ft. NAVD88. Place the material along Hideaway Beach between 1-1-12 and I1-14. 2012: Maintenance dredging of Collier Creek entrance completed. December 2012: Permit no. 0309260-001-JC approved nourishment of Hideaway Beach between, H-1 & 11-7, 1-1-4 & H-9, and H-9 & H-13. Included the addition of 3 permanent T-groins on the north end of Hideaway Beach between H-12 to H-14. Permit also proposed modification of the terminal jetty. CEC proposed relocation to the west and extension of the tip. 2.2 Historic Beach Nourishment/Engineering at Hideaway Beach Although this feasibility study is focused on the entrance of Collier Creek, events on the entire Hideaway Beach (11-1 to 1-I-16) and the migration of offshore shoals contribute to 3 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 8 of 31 DRAFT the conditions in the creek. In the past 25 years, a total of 15 T-groins have been constructed in several phases, the beach has been renourished with sand dredged and trucked from various sources, Coconut Island has disappeared and Sand Dollar Island has grown and migrated. A brief history is chronicled below: 1990/91: Approximate beach restoration of southwest Hideaway Beach. 1997: Five temporary geotextile T-groins installed: 2 at South Point and 3 at Royal Marco Point. February 2000: Permit 11-2934539 approved repair and adjustment to temporary T- groins and fill placement. Mod-01 includes permitting for use of a nearshore sand source. 2001: Two temporary geotextile T-groins installed. January 2005: Permit no. 0222764-001-JC approved beach nourishment on Hideaway Beach and construction of 10 permanent T-groins (replacing 7 geotextile structures) and a terminal jetty. Includes dredging of approximately 240,000cy from Big Marco Pass ebb shoal. May 2005: Permit modification 0222764-004-EM extended the fill template at Royal Marco Point by 500 feet with additional placement of 20,000 cy of sand. July 2005: Permit modification 0222764-005-EM extended and deepened the permitted Borrow Area. December 2005: Construction completed. 136,350cy placed at South Point (T-128 to 1-1- 4) and 180,420cy placed at Royal Marco Point (H-9 to 14-13). 10 permanent T-groins constructed; 5 in each area and a terminal jetty at Collier Creek entrance. September 2008: Permit 11-0222764-008 for construction of riprap revetment for shoreline stabilization between H-7 and 1-1-9. Emergency revetment was constructed between South Point and Royal Marco Point T-groin fields. February 2010: Major permit modification 0222764-006-EM for second phase of project including construction of 6 additional permanent T-groins and placement of 122,000cy of sand on Hideaway Beach between 11-4 and 1-1-9. December 2012: Permit no. 03 09260-00 1-JC approved nourishment of Hideaway Beach between, H-1 & H-7, H-4 & H-9, and H-9 & H-13. Included the addition of 3 permanent T-groins on the north end of Hideaway Beach between 14-12 to H-14. Permit also addressed modification of the terminal jetty. CEC proposed relocation to the west and extension of the tip. March-July 2013: Excavation of 30,000cy from the nearshore borrow area. Approximately 25,000cy were placed on North Beach (1I-12 to II-14) and 5,000cy were 4 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 9 of 31 DRAFT placed on Royal Marco Point and Central Beach (1-1-4 to 11-11). Construction of 3 new T- groins. 2.3 Historic Aerial Review A review of GoogleEarth aerial photographs covering the study area is presented in Appendix B. The aerials illustrate the timing of groin construction and the evolution of Coconut and Sand Dollar islands and the changing conditions of Marco Point and the west side of Collier Creek. 3.0 SITE VISIT A site visit was conducted of Collier Creek on Marco Island on December 11, 2014. The objectives of the site visit were to meet with stakeholders, evaluate the specific conditions of the junction between Collier Creek and the Marco River and observe the beach conditions of Marco Point on the west side of the creek. The findings from the stakeholder meeting and the observations documented during this site visit are incorporated into the feasibility analysis report and details can be found in the field observation report in Appendix C. 4.0 SURVEY METHODS This survey is in accordance with Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Standards of Practice as established by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers pursuant to Chapter 472 of the Florida Statutes. All work was conducted under the direct supervision and responsible charge of a Professional Surveyor and Mapper (PSM) who is registered in the State of Florida. Survey data was collected December 16, 2014 through December 18, 2014. A signed and sealed Topographic and I-Iydrographic Survey Map is provided in Appendix D. Vertical data was collected in the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). All horizontal data is provided in the Florida State Plane Coordinate System, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/2011. The survey control was sourced from the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Corpscon6.0 was used for geodetic conversions from the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29) to NAVD88. It should be noted that 64-878-A25-2 and 64-73-A24 were originally published in NAD27 and later converted to NAD83/90 by the FDEP. The converted values were consistent with the NAD83 (201 1) values obtained using RIX GPS from NGS published control and were therefor not updated. Table 1. Survey Control Stamping Northing Easting Elevation 64 878 A25-2 585065.02 413941.24 N/A 64-73-A24 588145.05 410914.71 2.318 _ 872 4991 C Tidal N/A N/A 4.40 872 4991 D Tidal 591727.19 417229.65 2.1 5 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2"New Business 10of31 DRAFT The offshore survey was conducted using an ODOM Hydrotrac sounder with digitizer on CB&I's 24-foot Privateer survey vessel with a centrally located hull-mounted transducer (Figure 2). A Trimble SPS461 DGPS and a TSS DMS-25 Motion Compensator were used onboard the survey vessel to provide navigation and attitude corrections. Water level corrections were based on manual RTK GPS water level measurements and the NOAA water levels recorded at station 8725110, Naples, FL. In order to maintain the vessel navigation along the profile lines HYPACK navigation software was used. This software provided horizontal positions to the sounding data allowing real-time review of the data in plan view or cross section format. HYPACK also provided navigation to the helm to minimize deviation from the online azimuth. f - 4 N Figure 2. CB&I Survey Vessel in Collier Creek Topographic data was collected concurrently with the boat operations. Topographic data was collected on the piers and seawalls within the study area along the eastern shore of collier creek using RTK GPS methods. The approximate location of the terminal groin was located where exposed. Upland sections of the "H" profiles and "C" profiles were also collected using RTK GPS. Profile station locations are provided in Table 2. Table 2.Profile Station Control Stamping Northing Easting Azimuth H-12 596064.92 413748.34 317.51 H-13 596373.52 414134.34 317.51 H-14 596628.92 414569.15 317.51 H-15 596680.12 415191.15 317.51 C-1 597116.4 414927.15 47.51 C-2 596968.92 415062.24 47.51 C-3 596821.44 415197.33 47.51 6 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2'New Business 11 of 31 DRAFT • Stamping Northing Easting Azimuth C-3.5 596747.7 415264.87 47.51 H-16 596673.92 415332.45 317.51 C-6 596476.92 415366.99 80.06 C-7 596279.93 415401.54 80.06 C-8 596082.93 415436.08 80.06 C-9 595885.94 415470.62 80.06 C-10 595688.95 415505.16 80.06 C-11 595491.95 415539.7 80.06 5.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS 5.1 Description of Data Utilized for Analysis An examination of the available data was performed to assess the coastal processes of the study area. The data analyzed includes: topographic and hydrographic surveys conducted by Humiston & Moore Engineers (H&M) and CB&1 Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CB&I 1/k/a CPE), current measurements collected by CB&I, GoogleEarth aerial photography and anecdotal evidence/observations during field visits conducted on December 11 16th, 17 & 18 , 2014. The survey data utilized for the analysis is summarized below. April 2005— Hideaway Beach T-groin pre-construction survey (H&M) December 2005 —Hideaway Beach T-groin post-construction survey (H&M) December 2006 —Hideaway Beach T-groin 12-month monitoring survey (H&M) July 2007 — Hideaway Beach T-groin 18-month monitoring survey (11&M) December 2009— Hideaway Beach 4-year post-construction monitoring survey (CPE) December 2014—Feasibility analysis survey (CB&I) 5.2 Channel Cross Section Analysis Comparative cross-section profile plots of Collier Creek are included in Appendix E. These cross-sections illustrate changes in the Creek's depth, width and cross-section area between April 2005, before the terminal jetty was installed, and December 2014. The timeframe represented by the surveys can be broken into three time periods for discussion of the changes: 1) 2005:jetty installed 2) 2007/09: interim equilibrium established 3) 2014: represents the current condition and illustrates the combined effects of excess sand and the jetty on the channel equilibrium Review of the channel cross sections has revealed the following trends over the last nine years: Ebb Shoal: In 2014, the ebb shoal around C-3 shows a smaller cross-sectional area, with a narrower and shallower bottom profile (below -10ft NAVD) and a narrower top width 7 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 12 of 31 DRAFT compared to the 2005 conditions. The results of the last maintenance dredging are not clearly apparent in this area. Inlet Throat: The inlet throat is located between the terminal jetty and the VDMW seawall near profile C-3.5. This cross-section has a smaller cross-sectional area with a shallower and narrower bottom in 2014 than it did in 2005. The latest maintenance dredging event in 2012, made the top of the channel wider above approximately -5ft NAVD. Main Channel: In general, the main channel (C-6 to C-11) cross sections have gotten moderately smaller and shallower. The cross-sectional area of these main channel profiles has either been reduced or has remained the same over the past nine years. The top width of the channel cross sections, vary profile to profile with some being wider, while others are about the same as they were in 2005. Shrinking of the inlet cross sections is visible in the profile plots. It appears that the terminal jetty has made the inlet throat narrower and shallower, which has impacted the entire channel. This trend was likely aggravated by excess sand from recent nourishment and dredge disposal operations updrift of Collier Creek on Hideaway Beach. The 2012, recent dredging event had its greatest benefit above -10ft NAVD where it increased the channel's width. Scouring threes that are needed to maintain the channel depth cannot overcome the recent deluge of sand entering the inlet. Although natural forces may be able to slowly correct this trend in the future, it would be best to address the terminal jetty and excess sand that are contributing to the shrinking of the inlet cross section. To return the inlet to a more natural cross-sectional area, the goal would be to re- establish the April 2005 cross-section between C-3 and H-16_63.8°. The Creek's west bank would need to retreat approximately 20 to 60 feet (this amount varies by depth and profile location) and the channel would need to deepen by approximately 5 to 10 feet. 5.3 Volumetric Change Analysis Using survey data from December 2005 and December 2014, a volume change analysis was conducted of the study area over the nine-year timeframe after construction of the terminal jetty. The region was divided into six areas for the volume calculations as shown in Figure 3 and reported in Fable 3. The Collier Creek area extends from profile C-3.5 to C-11; the Ebb Shoal area covers the entrance to Collier Creek; the Marco Point Beach area extends from 1-1-14 to 1I- 16 and up to 300 ft. offshore. There are three offshore regions that extend to the northern shore of the Marco River: Offshore Beach, Offshore Ebb Shoal and Offshore VDMW. 8 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2"New Business 13 of 31 DRAFT Table 3. Volume Changes December 2005 to December 2014 Loss (cy) Gain (cy) Net (cry) Collier Creek Area (C) 6,250 8,290 2,040 Ebb Shoal Area (E) 1,230 4,040 2,810 Offshore Ebb Shoal (OSE) 16,070 1,700 -14,370 Marco Point Beach Area (B) 20,050 830 -19,220 Offshore Beach (OSB) 18,030 14,030 -4,000 Offshore Ville de Marco West 15,880 4,560 -1E320 (OS-VDMW) Although sand has been placed on Hideaway Beach and Marco Point during this time period, the Marco Point beach area has experienced erosion over the past nine years. This region is east of the last installed T-groin and does not have any shore stabilizing structures. It appears that the beach area may be losing sand offshore and to the ebb shoal region to the east. This could be a result of a physical channel within Marco River reestablishing itself along the shore of Marco Point. The ebb shoal region has been largely accretional since 2005. A shoal with gains of up to 4 l. of elevation, exists in the center of the entrance to Collier Creek and contributes to the turbulence and high currents. East of the ebb shoal, scouring has occurred near the VDMW observation dock. The interior portion of Collier Creek has been relatively stable compared to the area closer to the throat (around C-3.5) which has experienced gains and losses of up to +/-5 ft. in elevation. On the western shore of the Creek near H-16, erosion has occurred since 2005 while, on the eastern shore, H-16 has accreted possibly due to underwater construction and improvements to the VDMW seawall and sand entering the inlet and forming the ebb shoal. 9 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. I e., L. '''101;'11 I IV i 1B-�5 �Ar I ,, P 8 1 I 1 .;.,�, a $P3fN 1 mo i 1 m i i �GO zI m„ 1 1 rio f9f,/----\ _, / tri'n\k\\, ci",) AIW, .. 1 1 b c �s'y g 1 J 7::,:.::,.,..7 - \\ ./.),"‘".„ .....11\ 4 _ w4 / -- --Kt:1 N'k 1 1 q� cI/, r f----- ----------,-„.,..„-...„,--,, _...._..._.,.,...,.. ,::, _ _ ,, _""k4-11 / /I i 1 _,/_t_- R 4 iI i i ��1�' _ - Z ' , d 1 fr l__ _Az.o.a Gk' ,‘”'/ -'---.1?,..uo '' ` \ `s . .a 4 ? Lo ....s,„ 4 n , vi);>", ''„ ;), i I z F. 1 pC� a \\\ `\\ O O P V P P o 4 N + O 1 N L r N b V b C O I, M F li / • u /91" N a Y1wnu pk No a IA —., 99911091 r, 5; 19 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, NC.-n $ inc DII�UgfI -TOPOGMNIC after i�' 9 y - wo 1 WWFR COUNTY.NAP7 FONDA roo.R R DELTA PLOT 2005 N 2014 X111 II lOCA M7nK�InlmA33@I PH. FAX(M7 11914191 A9 NOXn 153115 w pd p��.. ..r.ANmP CAA am° GAA M181 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 15of31 DRAFT 5.4 Channel Currents Analysis Due to project constraints, the survey did not occur during a peak tidal cycle. This fact is recognized and taken into consideration during the evaluation of alternatives within this report. It is recommended that a more detailed analysis of the currents in the Creek be conducted using the deployment of ADCPs during a complete lunar month to capture the variability of currents throughout the entire cycle. Currents were measured around piers and docks on the eastern shore (at VDMW) and along two cross sections (H-16 and C-3); Figure 6 shows sample locations. The currents were collected to characterize the flow at the entrance to Collier Creek. During the field investigation conducted by CB&I, the tides were measured and are shown compared to the predicted tides in the Marco River and the measured and predicted tides of Naples according to a NOAA tide gauge (Figure 4). Profile cross sections of H-16 and C-3 including the collected current measurements are provided in Figure 5. RTK Measured Water Level - Marco River Predicted -NOAA Gauge Naples,Fl Naples Predicted Currents 1.500 2 1.000 13 ._ 0.500 - i's, i i 1 r i + � i t , 0.000 - „ i p9 0.5 . 1 1 , 1 2 x i{ ",` ' , 1 , S .0.500 I ; ` , 0 a y I -1.000 7 t r ` -0.5 ■ x -1.500 , . 1 ■ i ■ I 2.000 x -1.5 -2.500 2 12/141200 PM 12/1512,30AM 12/151200 PM 12/161200AM 12/161200PM 12/171200AM 12/171200PM 12/181200AM 12/181200,M Figure 4. Plot of Measured and Predicted Tides 11 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 16 of 31 DRAFT LNE. 1, —t h:, r r'7.1T is t eck r:pprOxiro r '. Lc£�±Icrl 1071 .4,t/ Ebtt:l-or -, I , 1x� _ r 'k:'t1lE 11'.F F{— t' .r lli r.e L �iV.�..: �Ilx Creel' Fl d:.Er Fl...e u4 xt Fbt• t is pab—;4!-; EUb— ,'s { El'6. lie S"9 Pei A. IEi,^, fa : Is, ;�E,7 Figure 5. Currents Plotted in Cross Section 5.5 Inlet Stability Analysis An inlet stability analysis was conducted, and it was found that the inlet is nearly stable. Table 4 provides the December 2014 cross sectional channel areas that were calculated below 0 ft. NAVD, the width (east to west) of the 2014 channel and the section length (north to south) for each profile in Collier Creek. The available data is not sufficient to explicitly identify where the existing conditions are on the stability curve but does provide information about the general conditions at two cross-sections. At profile C-3.5, the inlet is being constrained by both the terminal jetty and sand depositing in the inlet. At profile 1-1-16, the inlet is scouring to create a wider cross section but has become progressively shallower since the jetty was built in 2005. The equilibrium throat's cross sectional area below 0 ft. NAVD is approximately 2,000 ft`. Addition data would be necessary to complete a more detailed stability analysis. 12 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 17 of 31 DRAFT Table 4 December 2014 Channel Area Below 0 ft. NAVD Perpendicular Section Length Profile Line Width(ft) Area(ft2) (It) C3 3,225 248 150 C3.5 1,938 179 100 H16_63 ' 1,832 240 150 C6 1,884 226 200 C7 1,909 227 200 C8 1,948 200 200 C9 2,026 230 200 C 10 2,138 230 200 C 1 1 2,303 311 100 5.6 Sediment Quality Analysis As part of the field investigation, 5 sediment samples were collected and analyzed. One sample was collected on the dry, mid-beach near H-14 and four samples were collected within Collier Creek using a ponar grab sampler. A map showing the location of sediment samples collected is provided in Figure 6. Sieve results in the form of granularmetric reports and grain size distribution curves are provided in Appendix F and summarized in Table 5. Table 5 Sediment Qualit Sy unmary --- USCS Mean Grain Dry Munsell Sample Name Silt Content(/o) Color Classification Size (mm) Beach-01 SW 0.25 1.49 5Y-8/1 CC-01 SW 1.46 1.54 5Y-8/1 CC-02 SW 0.31 1.22 2.5Y-8/1 CC-03 SW 0.76 1.23 2.5Y-8/1 CC-04 SW 0.23 1.45 2.5Y-8/1 13 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2`New Business 18 of 31 DRAFT r /9, V°41 •P Marco River oc 1 `-.•- CC 01 OOfl kANN;r<as • a rco WeY , 34(1 f ei B.. A ,- `CC 01 _ - O 'Or1- - ^ar �•H-14 H 15 CC 04 Leoend: 4011 oC s" • Current Measurements a P,I • Collected Sediment Samples• Profile Stations Notes: oc-R •s 711 OK• 1.Coordinates are in feet based on the " .441 Florida State Plane Coordinate System, 0c2 East Zone,North American Datum of 1983(NAD 83). 2.2014 aerial photography provided by Oc 10 Collier County,date flown December 18&19,2013. � Figure 6. Sample Locations 6.0 COASTAL PROCESSES ANALYSIS The coastal processes since December 2005 are illustrated in Figure 3 and Table 3, and are discussed in this section. The elevation change chart shows areas of erosion that proceed into down drift areas of accretion. The large erosion region at the beach of Marco Point lost 19,200 cy since December 2005 and the accreting areas offshore of Marco Point, the ebb shoal and Collier Creek gained 18,400 cy during the same period. This correlation between loses and gains suggests the main pathways for the sand transport. It appears that sand eroding from Hideaway Beach is transported into Area B (beach and nearshore east of H-14), which is downdrift of the last T-Groin, and then proceeds into Area OS-B (offshore beach) and Area E (ebb shoal); losses from Area E move into Area C (Collier Creek). By combining the volumetric changes associated with each region on Figure 3, with knowledge of the dredge and fill activities during this timeframe, we gain an understanding and how the installation of the terminal jetty in 2005 and dredging has affected the area. It is apparent, that the combined influences of the jetty and the large amount of sand depositing into the ebb shoal and main channel of Collier Creek have led to the conditions causing the high currents and turbulence. Inlet cross sections at the Creek entrance have become smaller due to sand deposition and the jetty location. Similar turbulent effects from this type of narrowing are seen at Haulover Inlet and South Lake Worth Inlet on the Florida east coast. 14 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 19 of 31 DRAFT 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION The following information describes the environmental resources located in the vicinity of the study area, including Collier Bay, Collier Creek, and along the beach and nearshore marine habitat along Hideaway Beach between H-I and H-16. Figure 7 shows the location of these resources relative to the study area. 7.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Sea Turtles Five species of sea turtles can be found in Florida waters: loggerhead (Caretta caretta), green, (Chelonia mydas), leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata). and Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii). Green (Florida breeding populations), leatherback, hawksbill, and Kemp's ridley sea turtles are federally listed as endangered, and the Northwest Atlantic distinct population segment (DPS) of loggerheads is federally listed as threatened. Of the five species, only loggerhead and green sea turtles are documented as nesting on Collier County beaches. During the 2013 nesting season, two green sea turtle nests and 1,091 loggerhead sea turtle nests were recorded on Collier beaches (FWC, 2013). Along the City of Marco Island, which encompasses 7.1 miles of beach from inside Big Marco Pass (Hideaway Beach [11-1 to I-1- 16]) south to Caxambas Pass (R-131 to R-148), there were 93 loggerhead nests documented during the 2013 nesting season (CCPRD, 2014). The study area is not located within the nearshore reproductive or terrestrial critical habitat areas for the threatened loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). However, there are critical habitat areas designated on the north side of Big Marco Pass for NWA DPS of loggerhead sea turtles: both the nearshore reproductive critical habitat LOGG-N-26 and the terrestrial critical habitat LOGG-T-FL-28 span from Big Marco Pass north to Gordon Pass (79 FR 39755). Collier County minimizes impacts to sea turtles by constructing projects outside of sea turtle nesting season and by complying with NMFS's Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions (NMFS, 2006), which include education of project personnel on how to monitor for and respond to the presence of sea turtles during water-related project activities. Additionally, any use of hopper dredging would comply with the NMFS Gulf of Mexico Regional 130 for Hopper Dredging (NMFS, 2003). Collier County will collect annual sea turtle nesting, escarpment and lighting surveys in compliance with all permit requirements. Florida Manatee The study area is located within both critical habitat and protection areas for the endangered Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Critical habitat for the Florida manatee is designated for all U.S. territorial waters adjoining the coast and islands and all connected bays, estuaries, and rivers from Gordon Pass, Collier County southward to and including Whitewater Bay, Monroe County (50 CFR Part 17.95[a]). Manatee protection areas (PAC 68C-22) were established as part of the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act (§379.2431(2), F.S.) to protect manatees and their habitat. The manatee protection area adjacent to the Project Area regulates 15 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. Li II M Ni O � mR 0) -O k tt m• L 'O N o C Z m u LL c LL 0 o O 3m E O U 0- • 1- p co W U v -e w,4 41 i„,._ P ems. `` 2 ....X".\\\\'',...\\\\:;,‘\;\.;\‘`...,\ . . . iii i I ' � t v N::;3: F \ / C fy 1 N W-� Y^•y LL 1-1-Y 01 ♦:yy♦ 1,\`r. a 7 J '"t w c4 of , , :-:,,.. 4,,,,,.? .e, 8 .., .+R cs,;;;-i e L* .: h c q `'k. ,.' -'y r,i f• ;iw.�1�,atl‘,:J'``1! if r,, •c d i .t ,nJ 1ir • 5t.' fi �`}} .Y� q �f ''.1• k1".,"A.� �•*'.,—,± "• t 2 v 'ib 9■� t.j.� ' 1 � ��.\" �3.µ��.jw I+ ;y:1 uti .,,,,..-•+' '�Ai; � (O 1� y� i. • N N 441 '‘ o > ♦ .Y. U U r c Y t .tea '; ,, � • �. O 0 s'b �° O+ y Y Sx �" D Kw n xly •A \ a .� A a p �" '�, [M 4*ta`� v 73= U O 2 L N O ii j. p. -8 } C d4980B--- - rte r¢ ! ,d• .: $ao` 3 rs 8' U g c N CQ O)+0+O) .2-8— • z.: mNa Z 2aAs m`d otc N c_ NN oZ,V 2 n.--. �:O N MQ N N co ` gommmr-'S `8i O r (V Z p.......o..wuwiw3 p...,..p.J,0,...SES IV....„.s.ai....„.*,... , CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2`New Business 21 of 31 DRAFT the speed and operation of motorboats, requiring vessels to remain at "idle speed" while operating in the protection area. The current available estimate of the Florida manatee population is 4,824 individuals (2,509 on the west coast), based on synoptic aerial surveys of warm-water sites on the east and west coasts of Florida in 2014 (FWC, 2014). Aerial distribution surveys conducted from May 2006 to June 2008 in Collier County documented manatees within Collier Bay, Big Marco Pass, and offshore of Tigertail Beach County Park (FWC and FWRI, 2008). Potential project-related impacts to manatees will be avoided by compliance with FWC's Standard Manatee Construction Conditions for In-Water Work (FWC, 2011), which include: operation of vessels at `idle speed/no wake' at all times while in the immediate area and when the draft of the vessels provides less than four feet of clearance from the bottom; immediate shutdown of all in-water operations if a manatee comes within 15 m (50 ft) of construction activities; posting of temporary signs concerning manatees prior to and during all in-water activities; use of turbidity barriers that manatees cannot become entangled in; and, reporting any collisions or injury to a manatee to FWC and USFWS. Srnalltooth Sali ftsh The Project Area is not located within critical habitat areas for the endangered smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata). The two designated units are located north (Charlotte Harbor Estuary Unit) and south (Ten Thousand Islands/Everglades Unit) of the Project Area (73 FR 45353). However, the smalltooth sawfish does have the potential to occur within the Project Area. According to the National Sawfish Encounter Database, 45 smalltooth sawfish encounters were reported in Collier County from May 2010 to May 2011 (NSED, 2014). Project construction will comply with NMFS's Sea Turtle and Sntalltooih Sawfish Construction Conditions (NMFS, 2006) to minimize impacts to smalltooth sawfish during project activities. These conditions stipulate that if a sawfish is observed within 91 m (300 ft) of construction operations, all appropriate precautions shall be implemented to ensure its protection, including cessation of operation if the animal moves within 15 rn (50 ft) of any moving equipment. Any collision or injury to a sawfish must be reported immediately to NMIS. Piping Plover Piping plovers (Charadrius ntelodus) are considered threatened throughout their wintering range (USFWS, 2009). This species is also federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918, and is State-listed in Florida as threatened. A portion of the Project Area is located within designated piping plover critical habitat . Piping plover critical habitat unit FL-27 primarily includes the Tigertail Beach County Park, as well as Sand Dollar Island, Coconut Island, and all emerging sand bars in Big Marco Pass. The unit does not include Ilideway beach (66 FR 36038). The critical habitat area was established to protect the threatened and endangered populations (Great Lakes, Northern Great Plains, and Atlantic) of piping plovers on their wintering grounds. According to the e-Bird database, there were 399 piping plovers observed in Collier County in 2014, including observations on Tigertail Beach County Park, Sand Dollar Island, and in Big Marco Pass (e-Bird, 2015a). 17 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 22 of 31 DRAFT It is likely that construction of the proposed Project will be required to follow the Conservation Measures outlined in the USFWS Programmatic Piping Plover Biological Opinion (P3130), which addresses impacts from shore protection activities on the non-breeding piping plover (USFWS, 2013). These measures may include: implementation of surveys for non-breeding shorebirds (including red knots), placement of equipment in areas that would not be expected to be utilized by shorebirds, and other efforts such as a designated travel corridor for driving on the beach for construction, predator-proof trash receptacles, wrack protection, and educational signs at public access points. Ru/a Red Knot The rufa red knot (Calidris canutus rufa), a subspecies of the red knot(C. canutus), was listed by USFWS as threatened under the Endangered Species Act on December 11, 2014, and is also protected under the MBTA. There is no critical habitat designated for the rufa red knot; however, this species may occur within the Project Area. According to the e-Bird database, there were 1200 rufa red knots observed in Collier County in 2014, including observations on Tigertail Beach County Park, Sand Dollar Island, and in Big Marco Pass (e-Bird, 2015b). Due to the recent listing of the rufa red knot, no programmatic Biological Opinion has been prepared for this species. It is likely that the conservations measures described above for the piping plover would be the same as, or similar to, the conditions required to minimize impacts to the rufa red knot. 7.2 Shorebirds The Project Area and adjacent areas provide habitat to a range of shorebirds including black skimmers (Rhynchops niger), Wilson's plovers (Charadrius irilsonia), least terns (Sterna antillarum), and snowy plovers (Charadrius alexandrines). Although nesting was not observed by these species during surveys conducted in 2008 by Passarella and Associates (USFWS, 2009), the Project Area and surrounding areas serve as foraging and loafing habitat for shorebirds and could potentially be suitable for nesting. All of the above mentioned species are protected under the MBTA. Shorebird monitoring surveys and restrictions on equipment placement (e.g. establishing buffer zones and travel corridors) would likely be required to minimize impacts to shorebirds in the Project Area. 7.3 Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (RBNERR) The Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (RBNERR), located at the northern end of the Ten Thousand Islands on the Gulf coast and comprising the western extent of the Everglades ecosystem, encompasses 110,000 acres of subtropical mangrove-forested estuary in Collier County. Over half of the reserve (64%) is open water and the remaining consists of mangroves, fresh to brackish water marshes, and upland habitats. 13ig Marco Pass forms the western boundary of the RBNERR and Marco Point, which borders the western edge of Collier Creek and the southern edge of Hideaway Beach, is also within the reserve boundaries. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has designated all tidally connected waters within the boundaries of the RBNERR and Cape Romano/Ten Thousand Islands Aquatic 18 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VII02*New Business 23 of 31 DRAFT Preserves as Class II and Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW). Designation as an OFW requires that permitted projects conform to higher water quality standards, which will be assessed through permit required turbidity monitoring during project construction. 7.4 Scagrass Scagrass resources have been documented offshore of Hideaway Beach (approximately between H-2 and H-4) during surveys conducted in 2005 and 2008 as part of the 2005 and 2010 Hideaway Beach Nourishment Projects. Since this seagrass fell within the mixing zone, a seagrass monitoring plan was implemented to document natural and/or project related changes in the seagrass beds for both 2005 and 2010 projects. Results of monitoring showed no project impacts. A compilation of statewide seagrass data also confirms seagrass resources are present within Collier Bay (FWC and FWRI, 2011). 7.5 Mangroves Mangroves are located along the west bank of Collier Creek. As part of the Hideaway Beach Nourishment and Groins Project (FDEP Permit No. 0309260-001-JC, issued Dec. 12, 2012), a monitoring plan was required to detect any potential impacts to the mangroves resulting from relocation of the rock jetty at the entrance to Collier Creek. Mangrove resources are located adjacent to Hideaway Beach on Marco Point as well as south of Hideaway Beach along Tigertail Beach County Park (SFWMD, 2011). Previous mitigation was required to offset potential impacts to 0.51 acres of mangrove habitat associated with fill placement from the Hideaway Beach Erosion Control Project (FDEP Permit No. 0222764-001-JC, issued Jan. 7, 2005). The impact site was located just south of H-1, in the vicinity of the southernmost groins at South Point, and the mitigation site was located within the RBNERR near Shell Island Road North. 8.0 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT There are a number of features that can be used to improve conditions in Collier Creek, and secondarily on the adjacent Hideaway Beach. These types of conditions deal with the flow of the Creek between Collier Bay and Marco River and the beach erosion found updrift of the terminal groin. The conditions in the Creek relate to the high currents, turbulence, poor navigability and scour caused by present flow conditions. The high current, turbulence and poor navigability appear to be caused by the tapering (narrowing) of the Creek at its entrance to Marco River. A secondary cause may be the effect of the fingers piers and observation platform on the flow. Between the terminal jetty and the first T-groin west of Collier Creek (near H-14), there is ongoing beach erosion. This erosion alternates with periods of excess sand, likely related to recent beach nourishment projects on Hideaway Beach. As a previous corrective measure, a terminal jetty was built in 2005 to partially stabilize the beach. Periods of excess sand are characterized by sand overtopping and enveloping the terminal jetty on the way to deposition in the Creek. Lately this has produced a pronounced bypass bar that is impeding navigation and 19 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 24 of 31 DRAFT smooth flow conditions in Collier Creek. Even with the terminal jetty, there are still periods when North Hideaway Beach is overly eroded, east of the last T-groin. These conditions could be improved with the features listed below. These alternatives are meant to be selectively combined to develop a workable solution to the main problems in the Creek and to maintain or improve the stability of the beach to the west as a secondary objective. The selected choices must not only be feasible engineering alternatives but also must be acceptable to the permit agencies, be cost effective and meet the objectives of the stakeholders. In order to assess the feasibility of addressing the flow and navigation issues at the entrance to Collier Creek, seven alternatives were considered. The alternatives include: I. Enlarge Entrance Channel to Equilibrium Cross Section 2. Move Terminal Jetty West 3. Remove Terminal Jetty 4. Adjust the Terminal Jetty 5. Modify Dredging Practices 6. Coastal Structures to Realign and Streamline the Creek Further to the West 7. Constrain the Flow in Collier Creek The alternatives are described below. 1. Enlarge Entrance Channel to Equilibrium Cross Section. The high currents, turbulence, poor navigability and scour indicate that the channel is too narrow at its entrance to Marco River. This is supported by that fact that these conditions appear to be worse at the peak tidal range. Every inlet has an equilibrium cross section based upon the local tidal prism and coastal engineering principals; it appears that the equilibrium cross section for Collier Creek is larger than the present condition at the Creek entrance. The equilibrium cross section is desirable for effective channel flow and for maintaining the inlet opening. The equilibrium cross section is best positioned within the sandy reaches of a channel where it is not overly constrained by hardened structures, which limit the channel's ability to expand and contract with monthly tidal variability and weather. When re- designing the channel at Collier Creek, the equilibrium cross section should be positioned between the end of the structures at VDMW (finger piers and observation deck) and the terminal jetty. 2. Move Terminal Jetty West. Establishing the equilibrium cross section between Ville de Marco and the terminal jetty may not be possible with the present location of the terminal jetty. The jetty may need to be moved further west in order to create sufficient space to allow for a relatively unconstrained flow between the Ville de Marco seawall and the terminal jetty. The movement of the groin will require permit approval and permission from the upland landowner. Within the 2012 Hideaway Beach permit, a jetty relocation was proposed but has not yet been constructed (Figure 8). The terminal jetty sits predominantly on newly accreted State Lands that were underwater at the time of the last parcel designations. The use of a steel sheet pile jetty, moved to the western edge of the easement may be the most easily permittable solution. 20 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING, INC. L) n o aw N .0 O N j N s- CO r z 63 r. V N o wO o o � �3 W IV_ ><NNNH----4---7.-- •''''''. , <,_on ri W NN p 0_ o Q F y / EK ER ARE E 41 500 �\ N / Z t at;�16' //^^ / //r Z / f �i W / w // Lc) 4 y Z �I 1 ' tn w w 0 Z E. Wui Z I � °Jg W O O d F f�► z O a a x J a �CC 1/1 Q"a '�/,��S•� 2C4w• a0 r 7 N z� P.,0 � /Vr csi 1— lz. J C•4-) \ . l ° NNN*4/ t '' I u 4 R � . J-Q �W 212 U co La 8 sy z z i\p, 0V) 1 Z V • "Ja cd:"10 \ vj W oz wW�d2 id '�. 1 , v \� , . j W< w -VU 0 2 \ J W \ cal -Ni CI eN- Tr w W p q a J O 91,-y m5G.o, <,_vm\ G, l ` \ ZZ7aW�SN 0 * \\\ ce ce a'< 3!._EJ 44 E 415000 "2- n 0 ou.06Wwaao = ,r) CAC March 12.2015 VIII-2`New Business 26 of 31 DRAFT 3. Remove Terminal Jetty. If it's not possible to move the terminal jetty sufficiently west. based on either permit or land use restrictions, removal of the structure should be considered. Historic photographs (Appendix B) show that before the terminal jetty was constructed, Collier Creek was wider and able to migrate more freely. The photographs also suggest that without the jetty, a larger cross sectional area can be achieved, which would allow for smoother, slower flow. Although removing the jetty may improve the flow conditions in the Creek, it may negatively affect the stability of the beach between the Creek entrance and the first T-groin (at H-14) as well as result in additional sand to he dredged out of Collier Creek during maintenance events. 4. Adjust the Terminal Jetty. The terminal jetty was constructed to control sand losses from Hideaway Beach. Historic aerials reveal that at times the terminal jetty is completely buried with sand and sand flows around the tip of the groin into Collier Creek and the ebb shoal. Adjusting the terminal jetty to be taller, longer and sand tight would allow the structure to better hold sand updrift, slowing the infilling rate at Collier Creek and improving the erosion conditions on North Hideaway Beach between the last T-groin and the jetty. 5. Modify Dredging Practices. Dredging of Collier Creek primarily relieves infilling of the Creek and secondarily provides sand for nourishing Hideaway Beach. During the last dredging event (2012), sand was placed on North Beach between H-12 and 11-14. It appears that the sand moved quickly back to the jetty, overtopped and enveloped it and is infilling the Creek, creating a bypassing bar. Maintenance dredging of the Creek should continue, but disposal of the dredged sand can be improved to reduce the frequency of maintenance dredging as well as provide additional sand to Hideaway Beach. Sand could be disposed of further updrift on Hideaway Beach, within the T-groin field. The nearshore borrow area could be used as a temporary holding area (stockpile) to be used in future nourishments. By moving the disposal area further west it would take longer for coastal processes to transport the material back to the terminal jetty. In addition, dredging the area immediately west of the terminal jetty would create a sand trap that would further delay the need for maintenance dredging at the entrance to Collier Creek. 6. Coastal Structures to Realign and Streamline the Creek Further to the West. Visual observations and historic profiles indicate that the flow tends to hug the east side of the entrance, near the VDMW observation deck and first finger piers. If this is the hydraulic tendency of the flow, then widening the channel may not totally alleviate the excessive turbulence and high currents being experienced near the observation deck and the first few finger piers of VDMW. Groins, breakwaters and even panels between the finger piers could be strategically placed to provide a means of guiding the flow away from VDMW towards the center of the Creek. This may address one of the possible causes of the unsteady flow conditions and scouring of the seawall. 7. Constrain the Flow in Collier Creek. In theory, reducing the effective cross sectional area of the Creek would reduce the flow possible between Collier Bay and the Marco River. 22 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2'New Business 27 of 31 DRAFT Reducing flow would lead to infilling and smaller cross sectional areas throughout the Creek. This may reduce the unstable conditions that create turbulence and high currents without having to make changes to the existing structures (terminal jetty or finger piers). This method is primarily theoretical and its implementation would have to be considered experimental. 9.0 GOVERNMENT PROCESS Collier Creek, located in Marco Island, within Collier County has many stakeholders and the costs of addressing the issues in the Creek will be a shared responsibility amongst government parties. Depending on the type of solution employed, various cost sharing scenarios will arise. Although this will be ultimately negotiated through government processes, this feasibility analysis presents points to consider for implementation of the various alternatives. The selected solution must not only contain feasible engineering alternatives but also must be acceptable to the permit agencies, minimize environmental impacts, be cost effective and meet the objectives of the stakeholders. Presented here is a cursory summary of potential cost-sharing partners: a. Federal: The Federal government funds small navigation projects, but it is unlikely that Collier Creek could be funded. Recent U.S. Army Corps of Engineers policy has been to avoid funding small navigation projects and not to start any new projects. b. State Funding: The FDEP (State) is a source of funds for beach and inlet projects. Funding of these projects is based on a ranked scoring system that favors public access, project size and other factors that are unfavorable to Collier Creek. The chance of using the established beach program as a State funding source is not probable. c. State Lands: The area between the terminal jetty and the first T-Groin (near H- 14) is State Lands according to the County Property Appraiser's parcel data (Figure 1). Use of the state lands' parcel is needed for full implementation of several alternatives and may have to be negotiated. CEC's proposed jetty relocation appears to have been approved in the 2012 Hideaway Beach FDEP permit, but may have been rejected for construction by the State Lands Department. d. Collier County: The County funds beach and inlet projects using Tourist Development Category "A" Funding, based on a policy approved on November 1, 2005 by the Board of County Commissioners. Two paragraphs of this policy apply to Collier Creek: Inlet Sand Bypassing and Shore Protection Structures. To qualify, the project would have to meet the criteria described below and be approved by a grant application review process. Excerpt from `Tourist Development Category "A" Funding Policy": 23 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 28 of 31 DRAFT Inlet Sand Bypassing. The bypassing of sand across inlets may he funded by Tourist Development Tax Category "A" funding provided the Inlet Management P1017 recommends the bypassing, the dredging of the pass or inlet is recommended by the Coastal Advisory Committee, meets the inlet finding policy criteria and is approved - by the Board of County Commissioners as being in the in the public interest. No TDC Category "A"finding will be approved for dredging non-beach compatible material except when encountered during an approved realignment or modification to an existing approved pass/inlet dredging project and then only when recommended by the Coastal Advisory Committee, Tourist Development Council and approved by the Board of County Commissioners as being in the public interest. Shore protection structures and project sponsorship. Projects, including construction and maintenance of shore protection structures (groins, jellies, breakwaters, etc.), may be fi-mded by Category "A"funding for eligible beaches. However, 'ownership' responsibilities must rest with an entity other than "Tourist Development Taxes" — i.e. there must be a project sponsor (private interests, taxing districts, municipalities or County Departments other than those funded with Tourist Development Taxes). e. Local Funding: The process for funding from the City of Marco Island and local property owners is up to the rules of the local government. At a minimum, the project may require a local sponsor and perhaps local financial contribution. 10.0. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the review of the coastal morphology of the Collier Creek and Hideaway Beach, historic aerials, site visits, stakeholder meetings and the current conditions measured during the field investigation, several findings have been identified. The overall study findings are summarized as follows: I. The entrance to Collier Creek has narrowed since 2005, when the terminal jetty was installed. 2. Infllling is occurring in Collier Creek. 3. Collier Creek experiences turbulent flow and strong currents around peak tides. 4. Too much sand is being transported to the Creek, shortening the time between dredging events and causing further constriction of the inlet's width. 5. If the jetty cannot be moved west, removal may be the best alternative. It is probable that a combination of the engineering alternative presented above, will provide the best results for this area. Based on the engineering analysis conducted for this feasibility study, it is recommended that the entrance to Collier Creek be widened 20 to 60 feet depending on location and that sand management practices be changed to reduce the amount of sand arriving at the terminal jetty and entering the Creek. Widening of Collier Creek would be accomplished by relocating the terminal jetty further west; if the State Lands Department objects to the relocation of the terminal jetty, removal may accomplish the same goal. Reducing the jetty's width by using sheet pile construction may gain additional width for the Creek entrance. Material from maintenance dredging events should be placed further updrift of the terminal jetty to increase the amount of time that it takes for the sand to be transported back to the Creek entrance. 24 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 29 of 31 DRAFT Improvements to the jetty structure can be implemented to make it more sand tight and further delay sand transport into the Creek. Prior to adjusting the terminal jetty, a numerical modeling study is recommended. The modeling effort will be able to provide additional assurances in the chosen structural and sediment management modifications, prior to construction. The County should request a meeting with State Lands and the FDEP to explore the options available. 25 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 30 of 31 DRAFT 11.0 REFERENCES Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, 2014. Tourist Development Category "A" Funding Policy, approved by the Board of County Commissioners 11-1-05. Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2011. Collier Bay Entrance Channel Emergency Dredging, Coastal Systems Assessment. Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2014. Hideaway Beach Erosion Control Project — Phase III, 2014 First Annual Monitoring Report. Coastal Planning & Engineering, 2010. Hideaway Beach Nourishment Project, Four Year Post- Construction Monitoring Report. GoogleEarth NOAA http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.Rov/ Collier County Official Records, 2005. Sovereign Submerged Lands Easement No. 30622 (5176- 1 1) BOT File No. 110222775 PA No. 0068737-002-JC. Collier County Parks and Recreation Department (CCPRD). 2014. Collier County Sea Turtle Protection Plan Annual Report—2013. Prepared by. Principal Investigators: Kraus, M.C., M. K. Toro and M. I-Iennig. Naples, Florida. January 2014. e-Bird. 2015a. eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance: piping plover [web application]. eBird, Ithaca, New York. Online at: http://www.ebird.org. Last accessed: January 6. 2015. e-Bird. 2015b. eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance: red knot [web application]. eBird, Ithaca, New York. Online at: http://www.ebird.orq. Last accessed: January 6. 2015. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2005. Hideaway Beach T-Groins Project. Permit No. 0222764-001-JC. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2011. Standard manatee conditions for in-water work. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, FL. 2 p. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 2013. Florida statewide nesting beach survey data — 2013 season. Online at: http://myfwc.com/research/wildlife/sea- turtles/nesting/statewide/. Last accessed: June 4, 2014. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI). 2008. Collier County Aerial Distribution Survey for Manatees (May 2006 to 26 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2*New Business 31 of 31 DRAFT June 2008). Geospatial Data. Online at: http://ocean.floridamarine.org/mrcis/. Last accessed: January 8, 2015. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI). 2011. Seagrass Florida. Geospatial Data. Online at: http://research.myfivc.com. Last accessed: January 8, 2015. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2003. Gulf of Mexico Regional Biological Opinion (GOM RBO) on Hopper Dredging of Navigation Channels and Borrow Areas in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida. Issued November 19, 2003. 121 pp. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2006. Sea turtle and smalltooth sawfish construction conditions. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), U.S. Department of Commerce. 1 p. National Sawfish Encounter Database (NSED). 2014. Sawfish encounters in Florida counties, May 2010 to May 2011. http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/sharks/sawfish/re�Gional4.html. Last accessed: January 26, 2015. 27 CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2"'New Business 1 of 9 CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. p ' \ 2481 NW Boca Raton Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33431 r Tel: +1 561 391 8102 Fax: +1 561 391 9116 www.CBI.com March 10, 2015 Gary McAlpin, Director Collier County Coastal Zone Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Collier Creek Interim Dredge Analysis & Design, Agency Coordination, Construction Plans & Specifications, Bid Assistance, and Construction Services (Contract No. 13-6164-CZ "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering") Dear Gary: This letter is in response to Collier County's request for a proposal for CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CB&I) to perform staff engineering tasks under the above referenced contract, to support the County prepare and construct the interim dredging of Collier Creek. CB&I will conduct a dredge analysis to determine dredge and disposal areas, coordinate with agencies for permitting of the proposed dredging, produce construction plans and technical specifications, coordinate with FDEP for a Notice to Proceed, provide bidding assistance to the County, and serve as the engineer of record to certify this project. A detailed scope of work is attached in Exhibit A. A fee proposal is included as Exhibit B, and the rate schedule is provided as Exhibit C. The cost with time and materials is not to exceed $68,845.90. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, all work will be completed within 180 days of receiving the Notice to Proceed. Very truly yours, Thomas P. Pierro, P.E., D.CE. Director CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. cc: Gail Hambright, Collier County Government Tara Brenner, P.G., CB&I Stephen Keehn, P.E., CB&I CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2**New Business 2 of 9 Exhibit A Scope of Work CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2"'New Business 3 of 9 Collier Creek: Interim Dredge Design, Agency Coordination, Construction Plans & Specifications, Bidding Assistance and Construction Services Collier County, Florida Scope of Work Contract Number 13-6164 Introduction To address the current conditions in Collier Creek, the County wishes to conduct an interim dredging project in 2015. CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering Inc. (CB&1) will provide the engineering services described below as required to obtain a notice to proceed from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), permission from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and conduct interim dredging of Collier Creek. This proposal contains the tasks necessary to bring the project through construction. CB&I will consult with FDEP and USACE to determine a project scope and required permitting. CB&I will support the County's inspection efforts before and during construction and will develop the post- construction report and certification based largely on the surveys, reports and observation of the contractor and the County during construction. This proposal assumes that no new permit applications, surveys, field investigations, studies or modeling will be required. 1. Dredge Design This interim dredging event is intended to be limited in scope to address hot spots within the channel that cause turbulence and impede navigation. The December 2014 CB&I survey data will be used as the pre-construction condition for design of the dredge areas. CB&I engineers will review the December 2014 conditions against the previously permitted dredge template to identify areas requiring interim maintenance. The interim dredge area will be finalized through consultation with the Coastal Zone Management Department to meet County objectives. The disposal area will be identified and delineated within permitted disposal areas. The objectives of the interim dredge design will be to improve navigation as a temporary solution while the comprehensive analysis of Collier Creek alternatives is being conducted and to utilize a disposal location that will extend the project life longer than the last dredge project. Volume calculations will be completed to determine the quantity of sand to be dredged. A dredge design and a complete set of design documents will be provided to the County for review. Upon approval from the County, CB&I will incorporate this design into the construction documents. Surveys are not included with this proposal; the interim design will be based on December 2014 surveys, and available monitoring or as-built surveys of Collier Creek or Hideaway Beach. 2. Minor Permit Mod & Agency Coordination It is the County's desire to return the creek to 2005 conditions and dispose of the material in a location that will maximize the time before infilling of the creek entrance occurs; this may not be attainable under existing permits. The construction area will be limited to that described within existing permits (FDEP Permit No. 0309260-001-JC & 305112-001-JC) or requiring no more than a minor permit modification. The intent is to obtain a notice to proceed quickly and avoid CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2**New Business 4 of 9 the need for a major permit modification or long permit review/approval process. We will conduct a thorough review of existing and recent permits and consult with FDEP and USACE during the design phase of this work. CB&I will work with the agencies (FDEP and USACE) to utilize existing permits to allow for this interim dredging project. Based upon consultation with the agencies and the County, the dredge and disposal areas will be determined. This phase will not exceed efforts of a minor permit modification. In support of acquiring a Notice to Proceed, CB&I will coordinate with FDEP and submit the following information: 1. Construction plans and specifications. 2. Updated Sediment QA/QC and/or physical monitoring plans (as necessary) 3. Turbidity monitoring qualifications. The names and qualifications of individuals performing water quality functions along with 24-hour contact information shall be submitted for approval. A copy of the plans and specifications will also be provided to the USACE in Fort Meyers, FL. 3. Construction Plans & Specifications CB&l will prepare construction documents including construction plans and specifications necessary for bidding the project. The construction plans will include plan views and cross- sections sufficient for the construction of the interim dredging project. The disposal site will be delineated within areas permitted by FDEP and USACE permit conditions. The plans will be based on the December 2014 survey. Specifications developed for the project will include: Technical Specifications with Environmental Protection Summary. We will integrate the QA/QC plan, turbidity standards, and permit conditions into the work. It is assumed, that the sand samples collected during the December 2014 field investigation are sufficient for the QA/QC process and that no new samples will be required. The Engineer will provide plans and specifications in Acrobat and Word format. The quantities will be based on the December 2014 survey. 4. Bidding Assistance CB&I will assist the County in their lead of the bidding process. CB&I will attend the Pre-Bid Meeting, and will prepare a basic addendum if needed. Once the bids have been opened, CB&I will assist the County in reviewing the bids and provide a recommendation to the County based on a review of the submitted bids. 5. Engineer of Record As the engineer of record, CB&I will conduct pre-, during- and post-construction tasks necessary for certification of the project. A CB&I engineer will attend the pre-construction conference. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2**New Business 5 of 9 During construction, CB&I will support the County's inspection efforts and perform occasional site visits to inspect the work. Based largely on surveys, daily reports and observations made by the dredge contractor and County inspectors, CB&I will prepare a post-construction report and certification to meet permit requirements. Summary This work will be performed on a time and materials (T&M) basis with a cost not to exceed $68,845.90 as outlined in the attached fee spreadsheet. The work will be completed within 180 days of receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Confidentiality Statement The information contained in this proposal is confidential commercial information and shall not he disclosed, except for evaluation purposes, provided that if a contract is awarded to CB&I Environmental& Infrashvcture, Inc. as a result of or in connection with the submission of this proposal, the requester shall have the right to use or disclose the data to the extent provided in the contract. This restriction does not limit the requestor's right to use or disclose any technical data obtained from another source without restriction. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2**New Business 6 of 9 Exhibit B Fee Proposal 0 0 En CI 0 0 Nit ,_ `- E0 N V O ~ V! Eil U I- C.) 0 O d O) >' o O O O .4. O) Q y = CO CD OCD 0 V Oi Z -- O N N c w A N 13, b i V m ... =O r V N V CO S En ET U E — a Q a ., C O O V N co O y y a (0 I0 N U at = E• En CO 0 O O u ` a .• E"n ro m °c 2 n C a N . N N In V E co O U V w T S En Ea u o 2 'o d 0 d` c N 0 U y o o.a O 0 °o 03 ro O V V N N N Ci O O u � a I c ol n C o « N ro o N c a ~ D b ` O N O ,- O O C 0, O W C Q O 0 l m En K v O o ' a N N O N _ ,., a C N .o 0 o O O O O N N V v y d N ... m N'n d o Z n o., En OO c u N 00 d u S o 0) N 0 O mm w 0 o - r. 3 o m LL Q U .- >.y� ` �z, = co X -J LET~ O p N N CO �_ c. Ury w a y Z ro O 'er''',25 S En M _ ca CI F n 0 N o Q a O m _ • N W • c O C O V O ED CO , p CO - 'O� O V CO N co f•--- o U c = En M w EA E c y O U E C c O N CO V N O u~) O7 O 0 0) 0 M N ,- o c I LA m n w L d ❑ O cn O N 2 E V V N N V co r ❑ O C O o a z' S N E C (0 0 0 C. 0 II II II C'. n o N u) o _ 00 M V N V d n ti ED M N O � 0 V 0 U U 0 ED cM- co) N - 0 I' CO N N E!) W O 0 O F- u-) U J Q I- C) S F- c 0 ,� o o 0. u u E 0• d • c u a o, N N F II C C 0 O p u c 2 d u rn c d m E O- O G o• d 2 0 0 m 1-,.,- c c O O 3 '0 i C O � C O 0 0 O N CI V N CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2**New Business 8of9 Exhibit C Rate Schedule CAC March 12,2015 VIII-2**New Business 9 of 9 Exhibit C SCHEDULE B: RATE SCHEDULE Standard Hourly Title Rate Principal $ 206.00 Senior Project Manager $ 172.00 Project Manager $ 147.00 Senior Engineer 1 $ 157.00 Engineer j $ 123.00 Senior Inspector $ 96.00 Inspector $ 76.00 Senior Planner $ 139.00 Planner $ 110.00 Senior Designer _ _ $ 114.00 Designer $ 94.00 Environmental Specialist $ 109.00 Senior Environmental Specialist $ 134.00 Scientist/Geologist $ 93.00 Senior Scientist/Geologist $ 118.00 Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 110.00 Senior Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $ 139.00 GIS Specialist $ 102.00 Clerical/Administrative $ 62.00 Senior Technician $ 85.00 Technician $ 72.00 Surveyor and Mapper 1 $ 120.00 CADD Technician 1 $ 81.00 Survey Crew-2 man $ 130.00 Survey Crew-3 man $ 161.00 Survey Crew-4 man $ 189.00 Senior Architect $ 154.00 Architect $ 121.00 This list is not intended to be all inclusive. Hourly rates for other categories of professional, support and other services shall be mutually negotiated by Collier County and firm on a project by project basis as needed. B-1 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-3 New Business 1 of 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Lease Negotiated Agreement No. OCS-G 35160 for the use of up to 500,000 cubic yards of Outer Continental Shelf sand sources from Borrow Area T-1 for the beach nourishment project along Collier County, authorize the Chairman to execute agreement and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: Approve BOEM lease for the for the use of up to 500,000 cubic yards of Outer Continental Shelf sand sources from Borrow Area T-1 for the beach nourishment project along Collier County. CONSIDERATIONS: This lease is between the United States Department of the Interior (DOI), acting through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), and Collier County, Florida for the renourishment of beach along 7.5 miles of coastline between Wiggins Pass and Gordon Pass, Including Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay, Park Shore and Naples Beach. This lease provides the county the use of up to 500,000 cubic yards of Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) sand resources. The term "OCS sand resources" means the sand, gravel, and shell resources found on or below the surface of the seabed on the Outer Continent Shelf. This lease applies to the extraction, transportation and placement of OCS sand resources. The lease will terminate in three (3) years or the receipt of 500,000 cubic yards of OSC sand, whichever occurs first. Collier County executed a similar lease with the Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service in 2005 to provide sand from Borrow Area T-1 for the 2005/2006 beach renourishment. This lease provides a large quantity of sand to renourish the beaches in the event of a major storm event or major renourishment. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no BOEM fee for the use of these sand resources. However, the County will be required to comply with surveys and environmental monitoring requirements which will provide valuable information to BOEM on the sand resource borrow area. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this Item. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. —CMG RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approves the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Lease Negotiated Agreement No. OCS-G 35160 for the use of up to 500,000 cubic yards of Outer Continental Shelf sand sources from Borrow Area T-1 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-3 New Business 2 of 2 for the beach nourishment project along Collier County, authorize the Chairman to execute agreement and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, hnpact Fees and Program Management Department Attachments: Attachments: Lease Agreement March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 1 of 34 r f \\ nited Stites Department of the Interior BUR!' 11 01 to N L:N1 1{t,Y \1.1' . CakNit:N r FEB 2 6 2015 Mr. (../ark NicAlpin Coastal Projects Manager Collier County Gov eminent 28(R) N. Horseshoe orseshoe Dri e Naples. Florida 341 04 Dear Mr. NicAlpin: Enclosed please find a cop) ot'the lease pro\idinfg for the use of up to 500,000 cubic yards of Outer Continental Shelf sand resources from Borrow Area-I-I for the beach nourishment project along Collier County. Florida (13()1;11 Negotiated Agreement No. C)CS-G 35160), Upon receipt of this package. please sign and date each of the lour signatory pages and return all four originals to 13Ol M at the address listed below Jeffrey Reidenauer. Ph.l). Chief. Marine Minerals Branch Bureau of Ocean Energy Nlanagement 381 Elden Street. Il\1 3120 1lerndon. Virginia 20171) 13()1;11 will execute the I,e r:e and provide two originals to tiou for )cur record. Please do not hesitate to contact Jeffrey Reidenauer at jciirc ci :' teu1.eor,! or (70 3) 7$7-1851 if you have any questions. Sincerely. Robert Samuels Chief, (..easing Division Enclosure March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 2 of 34 LEASE BETWEEN THE BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT 01 TIIE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERioR AND COLLIER COUNTY, Fl ORMA REGARDING TIIE USE OF OUTER C()NTINENTAL SHELF SAND RESOUR(.:ES FOR SHORE PR()TECIDJN AND RESTORATION IN COLLIER COI. NT Y., FLORIDA BOEYI Negotiated Agreement No, OCS-G 351(d) Title 1. E‘planatory Recitals A. this lease ("Lea:se-i is made under the authority of Section 8(1,t(2RA)(i) oh the Outer Continental Shelf 1.ands Act (OCSI.A) or August 7. 1953 (43 L.S.C. 1331 P,1 372. as amended 1-), P.O„ 103-426. between the I:nited States Department oh the Interim (1)01), acting throi.ugh the Rureaa of Oeorin 1 cig \1 in (IOliNn, and Collier County, Florida (the -County-, colle,:tively with BOOM and DO I, :he -Parties-) for the renourishmem of beach along 7.5 miles tit coastline betw.Lien Wigidins Pass and Clordon I'ass. including Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay_ Park Shore, and apIcs Beach. B. Tin: County is undertiiking a project in f urtherzillet: of the ..tboiiementioned go id to renourish Vanderbilt Bah, Pelican Bir , Park Shore, and Naples Reach (the -Project.) C. Prior to the' notice-to-proceed with eonizaruetion. the County 'will procure lands, easements. and ri;ghts-of-w ay (collectively, -Land Rights-) as necessary bunt upland landowner,. tinier property rights holders, and other persons and entities of appropriate ,eope and duration to facilitate the Project. Title IL Purpose and Authority A. The DOI, actiniz through 1101-:N1, enters into this Lease with the Count> providing Or :he use of up to 500.000 cubic yards of Outer Continental Shell sand resources (OCS sand resources) Or the Project under the authork of Section 8(1012) of the OCSLA >43 L.S.( § I 337(k)(2) The term -OCS sand resources- means the saad, gra\el, and shell resources found on or below the surface of the seabed on the Outer Continental Shelf(OCS), ris defined in Section 2(a) at the 0r51 A (43 1 S ('. § 1351(tI)). Ills Lease authorizes the County to use OCS sand resources from Borrow Area T-1, as designated and shown in 1 aide I ;And on the attached map (Attachment H. in accordance with the terms of this Lease. Alter remo\tO of the OCS sand resources Cron: the 005 and placement of those resources as spe,;i )ed En this Lease. BOEM has no jurisdiction over those sand resources unless they return to the OCS. Page 1 H CAI March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 3 of 34 TIthIC 1. Borrow Area T-1 Coordinates Based on the Florida State Plane Coordinate ystem, East Zone, North American Datum of I9S3 CNAD83). Northing tasting 7536606 201670 4 152745.4 201243 5 751935.9 201;25 751874 ' 2019284 7515353 201918 2 755216 9 202806 755122.3 203042 4 750110 4 204364 4 -2.05611 1 750100,2 7— 206418 5 755095 7 207103.5 750088.8 2031566 750300 7 207776 1 751206 8 208796.1 751473 2 2084744 751649 2 2062905 7553060 208057.7 7588266 205706,6 753612.0 205517.'d 7-----7526172 -205103.1 752627 3 204300.9 752656 5 201634.4 11, ROLM. under authority delegated h the Secretor> of the Interior. is authorized, pursuant to Section 800(2) of the (It.SLA i4 1 5 111700(2p to enter into this Lease concerning the potential use of t„)CS sand resources. ROFAI has determined that the Project meets the requirenlents of Section 2 R.A. i 06 the OCSLA. Iherefore, in accordance with Section St k)(25 and subject to the terms and conditions as contained herein. BOhAl hereb\ authorises the 1.1:--k." ot OCS sand resources from liorrovi Area I I dentilied in 'Fable I or the construction of the Project. F he Parties ackno\viedge that under the terms roof Section 8th'it2nRi. ROIAI \\Iil not assess any lee against the County lbt the use of the OCS sand tesourc33, deNct ihed herein. Ill consideration of the provision of (WS sand resources for the Protect, he County \sill pm\ide to No survey results (rid other data ati 1)rovided herein. which \\ti .tanong other things. give 10:„)1::\ valuable in tbrmation on the Borrow Area. Nothing in this Lease is intended to ahrne,atc or diminish the Secretary of the Interior's authority under the OCSLA to oversee and regulate the removal °IOC'S sano resources. Page 2 ol ;',H March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 4 of 34 C. Nothing in this Lease is intended to impede or hinder the County's ability to complete the Project or abrogate Or diminish either Party's outlwrity or responsibilities under appheaHe law, including but not limited to the National EnAironincntal Policy Act (NEPA), Endangered Species Aet (ESA), Nitagrurson-Sto ens Conser\tition and Management Act MSA). Itlarine Mammal Protection :\c: (!vINIPA). National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA or the Coastal /one :Management Ae (C/ ). Title III. Project Description •this Project is intended to renourisn the beach, reduce coastal s,torn iIi riad erosion, and provide recreational and env ironmental habitat benefits ;flow eroded areas of the C'oilier Yount shoreline. The County may extract op to 500.000 cubic yards of' OCS sand resources to renourish the beach. The OCS sand resources will be extracted from Borrow Area I-1 (Attachment h and placed between Whggins Pass and Gordon Pass, including Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay. Park Shore, and. Naples Beach (see Attachment 2). Title IV. Provision% A. Borm ,,,aahorizvs tite use or()cs sand A:sources from Borrow Area -1-1. I he CoutEy or its contructorts) may extract, transport, and pitice such °US sand resource s from Borrow Area T-1 only in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below and in accordance with the [lorida Department of Fmironmental Protection's joint rotistal Permit (.1t. P No. 0222355-012-.1N. the Army Corps of EnLineers iSACI1) Permit No, SA1-2003-12401, 1.,i.S A C T:', Permit Modification S,A,1-2( 0.7-12405 \101)...K Ds t in I in rn,:r applicable permits, U. I his Lease applie ord.:. to the extraction. transportation, and pltieement OtS sand resources as described abuse, '1 lie I.ease will terminate or expire upon the tuilowifi occurring: LI the County sending written notice to the Chief,. Marine Minerals Branch, Leasing Division, ROLM. 381 Hden Street, 11',\1 3120. 1 lerndori, Virginia 20170. that the County has received 300,000 cubic yards of OCS sand resources. or. (2) three years Ihom the date of execution (0' this 1.L%Lie, whichever occurs rirst, Upon request by the County, the panics may riv.rce m extend the terms or the lease as necessary to provide the County and its contractors(s) with additional time to complete the Project. I he parties acknowledge that there may he a need for future sand resources for periodie maintenance. augmentation, or construction purposes. 131)l and the ('aunts may enter into subsequent agreements, or the use of UPS sand tesources fur the Project. consistent w ith each Party s responihilnies under applicable law. C. IMEM and the Count\ reColIniite that planning arid ofuiii Ot 1.111.onjr! the P;Irties w II ensure that responsibilities under OCSLA, and other applicable Federal laws, are carried out and accommodated in an efficient and timely manner so that the project schedule will not be unnecessarily delayed or compromised. Both parties recognize that 1101 M, as a Bureau in DOI. has certain responsibilities for the orderly, timely, and efficient reco\ery at (JCS minerals using the best available and safest technology while ensuring en‘ironniental stewardship and compliance. respect to the Project. BOP.N1 and the County tig.tec to Inc followint.,,, terms: Pane 3 0130 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 5 of 34 I. Plans and Performance Requirements The County will ensure that all operations at F3orrciw Area T-1 arc conducted in accordance with the final approted '`Construction Solicitation and Specifications Plan- (tile -Plan-) and all teriat:, and conditions in this Lease, as reelI as all applicable statutes, regulations, orders. and any guidelines or directives specified or referenced herein. The County will send BOEN1 a copy of the Plan and :iiip modifications when mailable. `Fire County will allow (3Ok.N1 to review and comment i,11 modifications taa .hc Plan that may affect the project area, includin4>} the use of submerged or floated pipelines to directly. di``''rt (}CS sand re,aurccs from the laonow rrre:i to Mi.! placement site. Said comments will he delivered in a timely fashion in order to not unduly delay the County's construction contract or schedule. 'the County Will ensure that all operations at Borrow Area .l.-I are conducted in teenrdz nee with the final approved Plan arnd all terms and cciraditions in this Lease, as v ll as all applicable statutes. regulations, orders, and any guidelines or directiles specified or referenced herein arc stet. 'Fie dreduing and/o: eonv etance methods lie `: Borrow Area 1-I will be consistent with the priileet proposal cinalyzed in the supporting. NI.lj.\ documents, and hie method identified in other authorizing documents and all Dissociated state and Federal permits. if dredaing a: tot eontevanee ntethociti arc not wholly consistent with those evaluated in the relevant NliPA documents and environmental and cultural resource consultations. and those authorized be the i°SACF and state permits. additional environmental res€ev may be necessary. If additional NEPA analysis. consultations, coordination, and/or Federal or state permits require modification of the Lease, an amendment may be required. Prior to the commencement of construction, the County will provide a summary of the construction schedule. consistent with Parai,.lruph 14, The (County, at the reasonable request of 13(11:;11 or the Bureau i ,tl'Salety and Env ircnamental L;nfdreetnent (BSI;IY, will allow access, at the site of in operation subject to environmental and satiety re mlcitiorts, to any riuthor xed Federal inspector and must provide 13OL`NI or RSIT with any documents and reco.d;k that a arc pertinent to occupational or public health. safety, or environmental protection, coriscry anon �1 natural resources, or other use of the +. ( 5. us may he requested. 2. Endangered Species Act (ESA) Compliance With the NMI S' Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Statement/Recommendations f tiF\1 is the lead riln.ence on behalf of the federal (iovernment to ensure the Project ei�nal lie with all terms. conditions, and recommendations of the NNI .S Biological Opinion (dated AtiLlust 13. 2013. ataailr;hlc Online it ,sit i _f;() ). For rill activities undertaken pursuant to the Ptojcct, the County aorces to implement all terms_ conditions, and recommendations in the NMI'S Biological Opinion. which are sumutarized as provided in .Attachment 3 of this I ease: to the extent the summaries or this Lease differ !lout or conflict with the Biological Opinion, the Biological Opinion governs. I tallier, for all merit tries undertaken pursuant to the Project, the County agrees to implement all terms. conditions, and recommendations in NN FS 2003 Gulf of Mexico Retional Btoloeical Opinion (Call(()) issued to the f.T,S, Army Corps of 1 F eineers au d incorporated in the 2013 Biolo.gical Opinion. I he Pa`,e i DC 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3`New Business 6 of 34 ( Ri3() is also described in Attachment .. Count\ afgrees that it will consult with ! ()I I prior to commencing operation it it has any questions about the applieation of the (RB(). Hie Ci)tlnt■" \\till instruct its coI1tr ctclrft:l to implement those mitigation terms. conditions. and measures required or recommended by NN11 S in the Biological deal Opinion. In the event that the contractor k not able to provide the required inspection tit the turtle deflector equipment, the County' will notify BO1',Iy1 piior w conducting the activity and the County will be required to retain a NNII'S-approved third-party contractor to perform the inspection. In kIJition to airy reporting iequircnlerlts or recommendations in the Biological Opinion. copies of all relevant correspondence. monitoring, and reporting 111131 be provided to I()l:\1 evithin 14 days of i`satinet at tdri,ttt.lir‘iiiiiiljja,bdteritratti . The ('hunt\ agrees to respond to all I'etasonial1le requests from and cooperate with l3()l.M and NMI'S in meetiiag their tibli`t ations under the [S.A. In the event of any collision with or injury of a threatened or endangered species. including but riot limited to sea turtles. the County andlor its eentractor(s) must stop all dred Ling operations and immediately contact the NN1l''S Protected Resources Division {727-824-5:31 t,r% ereport,11111fssentl..lhl.atI Lu\'). the 1octil autllol'Ircd sett ttat't,c stii.ad;lig't'escue organization (krttl);r'-vvvvvv.selsc.notudgOv ispecirslurtleststruiditigs.hrmi, and 1O1t:A1 (di ettlt4tellifo ,( latent and 703-787-1215), The County acknowledges and agrees that, even where it is otherwise in eontpliance '+\'III ilie teltils and conditions of this I .ease and other required authorizations. incidental take of sea turtles or other endangered species by the ("bounty or its authorized contactors, within Federal water's. may require suspension of the I ease Evr ROl \I and reinitiation of consultation with NN1F . I he an taint and severity of incidental take that will trigger suspension. and the need for any such suspension or reinitiated consultation, \\ill be determined at the sole discretion of }3()l:\l. Depending on the results of an assessment of the take or reinitiated consultation, :3{11 \t in ik sole discretion mar reinstate the Lease. re'voko and terminate the I ease, negotiate with :he County an amendment to the CNistine Lease, or enter into a new [,ease with additional terms and conditions to protect threatened and endangered species. The County understands and agrees out behalf of itself, its agents. contractors, and other representatives, that no cluing. legal oetion in equity for dtuhri eti, adjustment. or other- entitlement against I3()I \I will arise :a5 a result of ran} suspension or related action. I nvir'niiniental Compliance POI 'v1 must ensure that the project complies vkith applicable or,'iro11111eiltaai laws, Including hilt not limited to ESA. N1S \. NIIP-\. and C/MA. `I he County agrees to include in its Plan and implement all proposed avoidance and i:ii nimil:itton measures identified and anul\led in the associated NFP\ documents for this project (sac L'n1'FraP7!fientt7! .i s,vosvwcni for the l,cewotve o/a ,\oio(a/ape/in1'0 I 'U.VO /0/ :CSC' a! outer C 'Will/le/liar Shill Stoa/.s 01.e1" the C'ui !C"7" C tatni'. Beek' /ii'/lfoltrtilt/nc1T/ P/oject. ('iiilitr (�'rarr7lr, Florid(' (Jul., 201 t. pp_ 63: acidIable at http:-irvvyvsv.bocm,cos C oilier-Counts-L t-Attachrtleutst). To mtnimite the severity of henthic impacts, the County \\ill require dredge contractors to leave undisturbed space between the €redge cuts to allow the rciati\el\ intact benthic communities between the i°urro\vs to be a source cif colonists to adjacent disturbed areas. Page 5 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 7 of 34 I he County is responsible for compliance with pail Federal l tmd state permits related to the Project, including but not limitcd to implementation of sediment ci)nlpatihilit) and compaction monitoring. sea turtle conditions. marine mammal special conditions. iltid seasonal eonstrut:ti of twirldowwS. Construction will not commence until tdle pre-construction requirements have l)ee21 completed. Addititrnafl,w, the County ww'ill require its contractor(s) to implement the mitigation terms. conditions, and pleasures required by N\IFS. 1. .S. Fish 111;1 Wildlife Service. IIi}rids Department of Environmental Protection. the US.ACL. and I.30EN1, as appropriate, pursuant to applicable Federal and state laws and regulations. In tt 3dition to the requirements identifietd in this Lease. required mitigation terms, conditions. and 1pe''astif.s fire reflected i'z1 the Biological ()pinion (summarized in Attachment 3) and Conservation Recommendations. Copies of all relevant cur'respondc:acc. allOnitorulu. and reporting must be provided to 130E N,1 within fourteen (I4) days of issu)Inee 'It r tiLeillI; t: t CIac .,4t,-`, tttleluditl!?, but not limited to observer Ind dredge reports), 4. Pre- and Post-Construction Notification of Activity in or near the Borrow Area Mc County Will iiivitc to attend a pre-ctmstra1L'tion nCetintl. that describes the County's and/or its agents` plan and schedule to construct the Poocet. the County, alter receivitlu notification front its contractortsL will notify BOl .l ai ho.;i3,.:_01 within 12 boars prior to the commencement. and no (cite' th1i ) `-t hoursa after termination. of Operations at Burrow Area 'Li: BOHM will notify the (.'cnun, in ii timer. manner or am OCS activity within the furisdiction of the DOI that may adversel■ affect the County's abil:ty to use 0( 5 sand tt)r the Proicct, 5. Dredge Positioning During all phases of the Project. the t`cxultd will ensure that the chediie and any bottom- disturbing equipment is outfitted with an onbotircd global positioning system ((aPS) ca,lalOic' Il1,:11ntaaintng and rROOldla ? loetttiL7l1 w-w'ithirl in iiccu triey r'singL iit no more tliiln plus m 111i11L1s 3 ureters. The UPS must be installed as close to the eutterhead or dro head 1s araLticabie. During dredging operations, the Count I arudlor its agents will ill lttc:fiat Is rotif:. 1I()1''ti1 at h ' ie n I b ),boom ?dr':" if (die{lgin,� occult's ontsi;.lc. I I rho upd?r) ed htlr'roisS",Brit, Anchoring. spudding. Or other bottom-disturbing activities are not authorized outside of the approved borrow OteO oil the (ICt'. except sv hen there ale immediate cooed 1)5 rc._'aridlni_' safety. navigation ristis, or enlct'Lieney situations. I he County anidor its agents will provide Itt)d°,M all appropriate I)redpitlg Quality Management IDQ l) or other equivalent data acquired during: the project using procedures jointly &velure() by t3(.)I.M and the ClSACLs National 1)(}y1 Program Support Center. The Count submit the 1)QM or other cquitial';cnt tl>ata, including drag,lte<1d. cuttenceid, or other ii,olra:tllic iii mccliaClll'sll CdreLlgii12. dci ice biweekly to di .,tf'L'1;11t' is )ocni. ti?'., \ sl1t1ifli IrV' it ir'<15 I will he submitted within 9(t days or completion or the Project. 1r awtl lalhle. the Coun1V will also submit Automatic Identification System tANS) data tier Wessels quahteinn under the Intel national Maritime Organization's s (l:w' C)i International Z,.oalcntio11 for the Safety of Rite at Sea. 6. Submittal of Production and Volume Information. Page 0 ti.tt,3() �145� March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 8 of 34 The County andror its agents, in cooperation with the dredge operator, will subnhit to BOli\1 on a bieecekly basis a summary of the dredge utter: lines. e)titliiliil .in\' deviations from the ortiniti Plan. A Ct)IC)t-ca`a;;1:;d map of the dra head. e.ittorhcad or other hydraulic: or mechanical dredging device will be submitted, showing any horizontal or \ertical dredge violations. The dredge track lines \\ill shovv dre4e status, including. hUtcllJIL, clteil+ itlw trit:i:siting. and pump-out. I1iis neap Nvill be provided in PC)l= format. The County andloc its agents 'Sill piovide at least a bitive k1v update or the construction progress including estim l;ed volumetric production rates to 13{..)N\1. The biweekly deliverables will he provided electronically to clretlr. i e .r 1)e t' s. 'C)}.. The project completion report, as (kscribi:J below in Paragraph I I. cell! al,:) include produetion and volume information. including Ua'r'v Operational Reports. 7. Lmeal Notice to \1 irincrs I lie County sn( or its agents must require its ewntraeklns) for the Project to place a notice in the tt. . Coast Guard Local Notice ti) \loritier. recording the thitefrtnie and location of Ir.i? it1 and construction operations in advance of eolmlhencement of d;edpiup. S. M trine Pollution Control and (..:ontint ency Plan The County iaid,or its tit' 'iitti °111iS1 require Is ontiiclort ) InLI st:heontractor(si to prepare for and tale all necessary precautions to prevent discharges of oil and releases of waste and hninrduus materials that maV impair water quality. in the event of a discharge. release. or incident, notification and response must be in accordance with a1plic'able r,gnircnler,is ut IC (' R part :30t). ,-111 dredging and support operations must be compliant with t 1.S. Coast (;Mare re1i lotions and the L.S. Ins ironmental Protection ' Vessel (icner"al Permit. 1. applicable. The County aud,c)r its agents must notify F O1-.:V of any i1(irrcennpliant diseh apes. re Cases, or incidents and subAiquent remedial actions taken, and pro%ide copies of all reports of the incident and resultant actions electronically. 9. Ila thy met ric lurvevc The ( n i S iind'or it cuts will provide I'tOr\-1 with pre- iirid p)st-dredging hid v metric stirycs iwt Uorrocs• Area I-I. I he 1?i'ae.°iirtd,lirl tit sun.Li' cc ill t?t: condti ted c itllii1 e>13 t hubti 01 o dredging. I h4 post-dredging survey will be conducted c ithin 60 O::>s at'tc.`r the: i.'t?.1)pl 'inni of dredging. If, within the next I to 3 s :irs, the Count`' 4Orriucis "i1;is bathsmetrie tit\cys )t Borrow All..1 h-I, copies or the sctrvey(s'r v:ill be provided to 1101:.11. Ilcraw rtiphie iry vas v,i11 be port}ruled in aceordimee with the l'`ACA llsdrogr.iphic Survc\irt ± \l:iou it I":\l 1 1 11)_ 103, providing 11)1) percent seamless cus it'<ige; using inte;rtcronictric° swath or toiiltibe.ain hsathvmetry. All baihvme°trio data will he roll, pitch, heave, and tide corrected using accepted. practices. Ihrec equidistant cross-t e lines \\ill be established parallel to the dame baseline. All survey lines will extend at least 50 meters beyond the edge of the dredge irea . All data will be collected in such a Manner that po`,t-dredf,'inr'_ bath\inch\ sOIV;'l data is compatible with the pre- dredging bathe metrne stirs es data to enable the latter to b subtracted from tire° torater to calculate the volume of(.,)(.S s,ind resources remised. the shape of the excavation, and nature of post-dredging hathvn-ietric change. 1'a�e 7 01.',0 i March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 9 of 34 Copies of pre- and post-dredging hvdrographie data will he submitted to } OEM \l a l ed!einft.) within thirty {?0) dais alter each stirt'e'. is completed, The c dellv"c:n" f }rnlat for data suhinissian is an ;\SC1I file containing N., V. and , data. "F he horizontal data will be provided in the North American Datum of 1981 (NAT) '83 t Florida State Plane, tLS. surtcy fe et, Vertical data will be i t ided in the North American Vertical Datum of 19818 i N,A,V ) Ls. survey feet unless otherwise sp' cificd, .^111 8,5-\-I 1-inch plait view plat of the sun,ey track points, as well as contour lines, will be provided at appropriate elevation intervals. These plots will he provided in f't)1' Connat, titrrvcy ni.:tadata will alsta be provided, 10. archaeological Resources C)archr,re a''r ehivtrorie or lr/i.';trtric Resource If the County discovers any p',e\"t autly lll`iw n historic or archaeological resources 1vhile accomplishing the project raenrsliorc of or in the vieinit\ of Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Rare. Park Shore. or Naples Reach. Collier County brill notify 13OL\-1 at any finding, 1 he Count:. will initiate the Federal and state coordination required to determine a the resources v�tRrnun a re.: very effort or il'the site is eligible for listing, in the \;ttional Register of Ili:Htoric Plaices, acid appropriate action for the resolution of adverse effects. (1//shonc Prehistoric or Historic Icicsourec,c In the .vent that the dredee operators discover any archaeological resources while conducting dredging C)nerataons in the borrow area ('r in the vieinit of pump-out operations, the County" 'till require that dredge alld`itr pump-out operations be halted ilia€u diotcll within 305 meters (1.000 feet) oftlae area of discovery. The County will immediately report the discover\ to Chief. Di%ision cat'Environmental Assessment. 1301".A1, aat 00} 787-1660, IC in%esti,oations determine that the resource is siunifieant, the Parties %4tll together determine me necessary further action required and how hest to protect the resources, 11. Project Completion Report Consistent with Paragraph a project cs,anulction report will be submitted by the ('oast to Hi)f-;\I within ()() days Odlowrna,, completion of the actiit ides authorized under this Lease. This report and supporting materials must he sent n 1',a"left`_. nd electronically to: (.hice, f<4'inc Minerals Branch, BOEiNtl, 81 Elden Street. MI 3120. Herndon, Virginia 2017ti and ,,re.f:it: r;t,,dd 1-± er:1:12oA. the report must conttmm,:,11 a minimum. the talla'O\bag iotorm<itlon: • the.; n,.ulle ;Ind titles of the project m nit ,cis otcrvicetnw the effort tfor the C oUtlit. the: en,pint.ering firm (if.ipplIC'fute), and the carit.'antor), inrludiml contact i0ti,)raatatitir� (phone numbers, mailing addresses, and email addresses): • the location and description at'thi; project, including as-built ie'atures, boundaries and acreage. the constructed beach width and length, the final total volume =)t nlateritii extracted tram the borrow area and the volume of material actually placed on the beach or shoreline (including a description of the volume calculation method used to determine these volumes): 1"'is'ne 8 of 30 9`J'i March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 10 of 34 • 1)()11 or equivalent data. in ASCII tiles containing the N. V. r iind time stamp of the cuttcrhead or drag arm locations: • a listing of construction and construction oversight information. including the prime and subcontractor(s). contract costs,other roles.ant construction information: • a list ot'all major equipment used to construct the project: • a narrative discussini1 the constructicm sequences and activities, and. it applicable. an.. problems encountered and solutions: • a list and description ot`any construction ehanite orders issued. if applicable: • a list and description of u\ safety-related issues or accidents top>rted during the `.ile or the protect: • a table. an example of which is illustrated belts showing the various her project cost elements: (Cost Inenrrtd as of Item Construction (.'onipletion (S) Construction I nsinccrinc.and Deso n Inspections/Contract Administration • a table. an example of which is illustrated below, showing the various items of work construction and m al quantities: Item f"stinl.rted Final Item Lo Quantity Quantity Mobilization and laenmobihratiorl I 2 Beach Fill Am beach or of t'shore hard structure pl:teed or re:l3o'aed • a narrative and any appropriate tables describing any environmental .sum e>s or efforts associated with the project and costs associated with these stir\ers or efforts', • it able listing .steinI eitTlt construction (tales beginning siltli slid o11enr"'.Ic mci '11(.1.111":4. 1\tt11 lini t acceptance of the project hrr the County: • digital d ttti containing the ,is-built driii u s betel,-ti 11 cross-sections, and stiriei data: • any additional pertinent comments. Page 9 ot'; {} March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 11 of 34 12. Reporting Compliance I he Cintoty andlor their agents will designate, in advillice Of t:OBStrUCti011. a single point-oll- contact responsible for facilitation of compliance with all Lease requirements, liOPAI ,tiso requests the County dcsitznate a back-up contact, should the original contact be unavaila'.)1e. The cont let information ill be provided to BOEN1 it dro,L,einfo,!.boLmi.go,, at least 30 days in advance of dretigir and construction operations. inc Parties \,vih attempt to reasonably comply with the pro isians of this Lease, Should there be an allegation of 0 failure to compl:!.. the noncompliance will be corrected Os 50011 is possible and'or resolved jointb, among. BOFNI and the County. including through the dispute resolution process identified in Pararaph 1„5. OS necessarY. 13. Responsibilities between ll(„)ILM and the County. the County ttssumes all responsibility for the Project. activities authorised under this Lease, and the determination of the suitability of OCS sand resources for these purposes. [30[N1 does not warrant that the OCS sand resources used in this Project are suitable for the purpose t6r which they are intended by the County, and 1301 NI disclaims any and all iesponsibility for the physical and tinancial acti'ides undertaken by the County or any other parties in pursuit of the Project. 14. Sharing of Information Consistent with the purpose stipulated by the Parties in this Lease, and to the extent ttlio‘Ned law., policy, and regulation. the County and 1301•M agree to t share all information needed Cor or generated from the Project. includinu the sharing of implementation and other applicable schedules; (2) provide such information to the requesting agency as expeditiously as and (3 work to ensure that all requi:cd completion report information is received, 15. Resolution of Disputes The P Hlry S igree to !mike every titti.impt to settle an:, disputes regirdM,2, this I.elise tit th lowest operational level possible. Iii the Cask! at (Ii a substantial disagreement betv,,ecn 1.30hAl and ir.e. County viiiith respect to any aspect of 110LN1`;...,. authori7ation of the use Of()CS sand resources in iteiordtince with the loans and conditions as specified or (2) imy alleged brei,ich by a Ploy of:1%4 terms and conditions as specified herein, the undersigned will designate a senior management oltieial in their respective organizat ion to state the area s) disitgreconLint or alleged bleach in writing and present such statement to the other Party for consideration. If resolution is not reached within 60 days, the undersigned will request the active participation at the Counts Manager, Collier County and the ftiputy Director. liONNI. Page It) 01'30 ) March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 12 of 34 16, Notices I \cep' as otherwise provided herein. all notices relating to this I ease or activities autnortied hereunder by or among the Parties must be provided to the following addresses: To Collier County Leo E. Ochs. Jr. County Manager Collier County Government 3299 ilinnitimi Trail Fast. Suite 202 Naples, H. 34112-5746 Gary McAlpin Coastal Projects Manager Collier County Government 2801) N. Horseshoe DriN,e Naples. Florida 34104 To HOLM: Jet Croy keidennuer Chief. Marine Minerals Branch Bureau of Ocean hinerp \lanagement 381 LIden Street 11N1 3110 I lerndon, Virinia 20170 Ail electronic notifications, submissions and deliverables to 1301A4 should be sent to: q boom 17. Miscellaneous 'l his Lease does not affect ritri, preexisting,or independent relationships or obligations wrong the Parties, including, t.11`, other relationships or obligations between l.1014:‘,1 and the Count,,,.. or am, other units of such Derailments or ap2ncics. All rights in the bon-ow area not expressly granted to the County by this Lease are hereb:„ reserved to 1301-iNI. li()EI'd reserves the right to authorize other uses in die borrow area that will not unreasonably interfere with activities authorized under this I ease. 1101.A1 will the County to review and comment on any proposed authorizations for :he use of DC S sand resources in the borrow area while this Lease is in effect. Nothing herein is intended to conflict with current 1.301Al. other liederal, state. or Counts statutes. regulations or ordinances. It' the terms or this lease are inconsistent with ,ixistiagi statutes, regulations or ordinances of either of the Parties entering into this Lease. then those portions of this leme that are determined to he inconsistent will be invalid, bat the remaining terms and conditions not affected by the ineonsistene will remain in lull force aml effect Al the Pa1,4t: 11 (If 3(1 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 13 of 34 First opportunity for review of the Lease, all neeessar Lihanges necessary will be a,ieomplished either h an amendment to this Lease or by entering into a new Lease, tetaichetvcr is deemed expedient to the interests of the l'cartles. r'his agreement may he executed in two (2) or more counterp rts, each of which will be dccmcd an otitinal, the :oantataares to this iapeement may be ex.ecuted on sc;pa ue pages, and when attached to this aer:.etnent. will constitute one complete document. The remainder of this passe intentionally left blank. Page 12 of 2(1 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 14 of 34 LEASE liETNN FEN THE BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERCY MANAGEMENT OF THE I)EPARTMENT OE'HIE INTERIOR AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RECA17.D1NG THE USE OF OUTER CONTINENTAL. SHELF SAND RESOURCES FOR Ill \( REN(WRISIINIENT IN COLLIER COEN IN, Fl.()IZIDA BOENI Negotiated Agreement No. ()CS-t; 35160 F. Renee Orr ira Nance Cuef, Office ot Strategic i:esourec‘, Civairinni 131reau of Occur kierg) Nianag,:rnent Collier Count% Board of ConAtnisoners Department of the Interior Collier County, f lori Date: vH-1P1 E. 8ROCK, Cie Approved as to form and legality Assistant County Attorney Puie 13 ,,C30 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 15 of 34 LEASE REE\V E E N I"III: IIt112E?.\t- OF ()CLAN ENERGY \I\' CI:\'IF\T OF THE 1)1 PAI2'I\IF\"r OF THE INTERIOR AN I) COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I}(Y:1RI)ING THE. USE OF OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF SAND RIS() R(:I S FOR BEACH R NOI'RISII\1 N.1 IN COLLIER COCNT1', FLORIDA 11()EMI Negotiated Agreement No (.)('ti-G. 35160 L Renee Orr Tim Nance (lief, ()nice of`;1r ite,l i : Resources Citaint on Ilurc°tt, o1`(;)cc to 1 mal;emenf Collier Count:, l o:tn of Commi oocrs I)cparttnent of the Interior Collier County, I ?oricla Dote Date Approved as to form and legality Assistant County Attorney 1''i e I.j of .,() March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 16 of 34 LEASE. BETNVEPIN TiwIlL,REAL OF OCEAN ENERGY N1ANAGENIENT OF TIIF, DF:PARTNIENT or THE IN Fl AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REGARDING THE USE OF OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF NAND RESOL:RCES FOR BEACH RENIIURISIINIENT IN COLLIER COI Y, FLORIDA I3OEN1 Negotiated Agreement No. OCS-G 35160 L. Renee 011. Tim Nan.cr,,, OrtieQ of S-trategie Resources Uhait man Buleau of Ocean FaiLli.,; Nlanugenicnt (Built' Board of Commk:.,ioncr„, Dep,irtnient of the Interior Collier Florida D,ue: OftU(;i., Ciu Approved as to form and legality Assistant County Attorney P;11.4e 13 or March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 17 of 34 LEASE BET\VEEN THE BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY \1,AN A(;F\IENT OE 11I1,= DEPARTMENT OF,,THE IN'I°I?IZIC)R ANI) ('OI,LIEI( COUNTY, FLORIDA RE(ARI)IN(. THE USE OF OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF SANI) RF:S()t'R(IaS FOR BEACH RENOt RISIIti1I N"1 IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOEM Negotiated Agreement No. OCS-( 35160 I.Renee Orr Tim Nance Chief, Office of S,r 1. i.: Resource, Cri:M! in I tircou of Ocean I'.ttergv' Management t, oIher Count`' f Uard or Commissioner Department of the Iraerior (*oilier Count}, f lorufs Date: _ ._ W___.__..w .__ Date: __ -, Approved as to form and legality Assistant county Attorney Pate 13 of$0 March 12,2015 VIII-3"New Business 18of34 II This � P a e intentionally leji blank Page 14 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII 3'New Business 19 of 34 uy 1ap) ng�y rL,.r .iw�- r:•77 g Uu Ai1YYJLLti S lun L YOJ yA.��... .____ •� .._.._. y u iJN."1'. y= 1 • .• LL YJW SOWN , - 6 =101141 $OlIZT,r.ItTZ"01 �� M1.1,1f1a,r� wlwroaMUw»o.rMO.. �.si: __..____ Amrewi,el..wlc+rrlov� .— �; .11..x. 1II 60101.,17101/M3 Y 7WMMMr1d lN.111. _ • f-'�Q c . a+1 -_ , #`_-izia viii xid '�A 'Ii0il • �/ a 1S w" ;• rn R5 $ ri;r �11F17 7 %.: 5' gc Q ; : :Sz :'�/ tom': d i " '"' ill%''''' 2 . : 0 ., ,,, .. ..1.tiej ....0 crs J Oip r ; fill/i i i 110..:, . .4" �U a }i LOW 1 '4 ! 70 , 1 • ' /i P'-' ; !! li cl te „ � a •` O 0 9 N r , !i• ri INP*411.4 War) CCI '7 e1� , , Z V3.--, 16.Q 6 o 3' 031 ''. 0 D o , 4 „t, = r iz R aR. * f P. sir :' 4 3 �' N E itt - of c ! .� I ' illy Ili 6, {j P WP 6 1 ° Dart March 12,2015 VIII-3`New Business 20 of 34 BAREFOOT BEACH 4..2 I WFGC,�NS PASS TA.LAHASSEE JACKSONVILLE 5. DELNOR-WIODIN y PROJECT ORLANDO STATE P WI n7.! LOCATICM'\TAapA q/LAZY"1'C G OCEAN' HENDRY CO,\' O BOCA 4 • RATON LEE VANDERBILT CO. c �- MIAMI VANDERBILT� i 5/p+� BEACH c0 , ? ' &UL' N 70)004 /��- ; �' f8� CF P„� MEXICO `\ GULF MONROE CO. tea•` ` : ..� ..d ea CF P�"'� C MEXICO -' PELICAN 1 PELICAN 0 i.°'\ BAY BAY 1 11 i \ PARK + II SHORE�\ CLAM PAS R4o SR ses PERMITTED \ Neaoow I N°A7°g0 PIPELINE 'r , __- CORRIDOR / I ...-.._-=ii•-=-__-=�_ ,'=.94,--.� fiill PARK SHORE � i h 1 -noc r- 1 MlIiCr� SR aae .-•----. 2Q' CONTOUR �� — �i II NAPLES SR 8543 s NAPLES ,t --- _ IN 8&)000 i „w^,r' yI I 1 N 600W-_-. LEGEND .' \ c PERMITTED PIPELJNE CORRIDOR —7 PROJECT LIMITS '� ® PRDPOSED FlLL AREAS • 4( } ® PELJC"AN BAY FILL AREA GULF �'' 1( I l ® PROPOSED NEARSHORE V OPERATIONAL AREAS DF L ® PERMITTED OFFSHORE MEXICO ' OPERATIONAL.AREAS ,1 V•'T ROYAL G R70 MEP MONUMENTS 0 \ NOTES: GORDON PASS 1- COORDINATES ARE IN FEET \ BASED PLANE CO COORDINATE SYST 0 4 g0)00 PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE,NORTH AmEEIK.AN !"'- 1-------+ DATUM OF 1983(NA D43). ` . ,,\.c g GRAPFIC SCALE IN FT N. 2. FILL WIDTHS ARE NO I.TO SCALE. ` Attachment 2—Map Showing Location of Sand Placement Sites Page 16 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 21 of 34 Attachment 3–Summary of Final Biological Opinion Summaries' of ESA Section 7 Conditions per NMFS Biological Opinion dated August 13, 2013 Conditions written for BOEM per the August 13,2013 Biological Opinion entitled "Lease of Borrow Area Ti to the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department for the Collier County Beach Renourishment Project (Consultation Number SER-2012-9274)" (http://www.boem.gov/Non-Energy-Minerals/Marine-Mineral-Projects.aspx): Incidental Take Sea Turtles Based on historical distribution data, hopper dredge observer reports, nesting data, relocation trawling information, and observations of past strandings, loggerhead, Kemp's ridley, and green sea turtles may occur in the action area and may be taken by the relocation trawling or hopper dredging operations in federal waters for this project. NMFS anticipates that documented (i.e.,by onboard observers) incidental take in federal waters, by hopper dredge entrainment, will consist of 2 sea turtle mortalities (either 2 loggerheads or I loggerhead and 1 Kemp's ridley). NMFS also anticipates the non-injurious incidental take, by relocation trawling, of 100 sea turtles (75 loggerheads, 10 Kernp's ridleys. and 15 green sea turtles) during the 120 days of the hopper dredging in federal waters. Takes by Hopper Dredge Takes by Relocation Trawling Species Observed Take# Species Observed Take# Loggerhead Loggerhead 7 5 OR Kemp's ridley 10 Loggerhead 1 Green 15 Kew's ridley 1 —Total 2 " Total 100* *Does not account for 2 unobserved takes that No lethal take authorized for relocation NrVIFS assumes will be loggerheads trawling 1. The following terms and conditions implement the Reasonable and Prudent g P Measures (RPM): 1. An endangered species project report summarizing the results of the dredging and the sea turtle take (if any) must be submitted to BOEM within 30 working days of completion. Reports shall contain information on project location, start-up and completion dates, cubic yards of material dredged, problems encountered, incidental takings (include photographs, if available) and sightings of protected species, mitigative actions taken (if relocation trawling, the number and species of turtles relocated), screening type (inflow. overflow) utilized. daily water temperatures, name of dredge, names of endangered species observers, percent of observer Attachment 3 is a summary provided for your reference;to the extent it differs or conflicts with the Biological Opinion,the terms and conditions of the Biological Opinion govern. Page 17 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3`New Business 22 of 34 coverage, and any other information the BOEM and/or contractor deems relevant. This report must be provided to NIVMFS's Protected Resources Division (PRD) at the address provided in RPM 1 of the Biological Opinion and notification of take shall be provided to NMFS at the following c-mail address within 24 hours, referencing the present opinion by NMFS identifier number (SER-2012-9274), title, and date: takereport,nmfsser @noaa.gov. BOEM will provide NMFS's Southeast Regional Office (address provided in RPM 1 of the Biological Opinion) with an end-of-project relocation trawling report within 30 days of completion of arty relocation trawling. This report may be included within the project report (sec RPM 1). 2. Collier County shall notify BOEM of the start-up and completion of hopper dredging operations and ask to be notified of any sea turtle strandings in the project area that, in the estimation of the Sea Turtle Stranding and Salvage Network (STSSN) personnel, bear signs of potential draghead impingement or entrainment, Information on any such strandings shall be reported in writing within 30 days of project end to BOEM, or included in the project report (see Term and Condition 11 1). 3. Collier County shall arrange for NMFS-approved protected species observers to be aboard the hopper dredge to monitor the hopper bin, screening, and dragheads for sea turtles and their remains. For the proposed action, 100 percent observer monitoring is required. Beach observers cannot be used in place of shipboard observers for hopper dredging of borrow areas (see RPM 2). 4. Relocation trawling is required to commence 24 hours prior to dredging and will continue throughout the dredging portion of the project (see RPM 3). 5.The following conditions must be observed during relocation trawling(see RPM 3): a. Trawl Time: Trawl tow-time duration shall not exceed 42 minutes (doors in — doors out) and trawl speeds shall not exceed 3.5 knots. b. Handling during Trawling: Sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish' captured pursuant to relocation trawling shall be handled in a manner designed to ensure their safety and viability, by implementing the measures below. c. Captured Turtle Holding Conditions: Captured turtles shall be kept moist, and shaded whenever possible. until they are released. They may be held for up to 24 hours if opportunistic, ancillary, "piggy-back" research (e.g., opportunistic satellite tagging) is proposed. NMFS encourages Collier County to make fuller use of protected species taken during hopper dredging and relocation trawling by allowing and encouraging duly permitted "piggy-back" research projects on protected species taken during these activities (In accordance with the GRBO's T&C 15-d, Conservation Recommendation 5, as summarized below). d. Weight and Size Measurements: All turtles shall be measured (standard carapace measurements including body depth) and tagged (Passive Integrative Transponder [PIT] or Inconel), and weighed prior to release when safely possible; smalltooth sawfish shall be 2 Although smalltooth sawfish trawl captures are not expected,these terms and conditions are included for such an eventuality. Any take of sawfish would require immediate reinitiation of consultation with NMFS. Page 18 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3`New Business 23 of 34 measured (fork length and total length)and— when safely possible—tagged, weighed, and a tissue sample taken prior to release. Only NMFS-approved observers or observer candidates in training under the direct supervision of a NtMFS-approved observer may conduct the tagging/measuring/weighing/tissue sampling operations. Flipper Tagging: All sea turtles captured by relocation trawling shall be flipper-tagged prior to release with external tags which shall be obtained prior to the project from the University of Florida's Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research. This Biological Opinion serves as the permitting authority for any NMFS-approved endangered species observer a relocation trawler to flipper-tag with external tags (e.g., Inconel tags) captured sea turtles. Columbus crabs or other organisms living on external sea turtle surfaces may also be sampled and. removed under this authority. PiT Tagging and Scanning: All sea turtles captured by relocation trawling or dredges shall be thoroughly scanned for the presence of PIT tags prior to release using a scanner powerful enough to read dual frequencies (125 and 134 kHz) and read tags deeply embedded deep in muscle tissue (c.g„ manufactured by Biomark or Avid). Turtles which have been previously PIT tagged shall never-the-less be externally flipper tagged. The data collected (PIT-tag scan data and external tagging data) shall be submitted to NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Attn: Lisa Belskis, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, Florida 33149. All data collected shall be submitted in electronic format within 60 working days to Lisa.Belskis(iv'noaa.gov. PIT tagging may only be conducted by observers with PIT-tagging training or experience. This Biological Opinion provides the authority to NMFS-approved observers to PIT tag captured sea turtles without the need for an ESA Section 10 permit. e. Take and Release Time During Trawling- Turtles: Turtles shall be kept no longer than 12 hours prior to release (except as noted in 5.c. above) and shall be released not less than 3 nautical miles (nm) from the dredge site. Recaptured turtles shall he released not less than 5 nm away and shall be released over the side of the vessel, away from the propeller, and only after ensuring that the vessel's propeller is in the neutral, or disengaged, position (i.e., not rotating). If it can be done safely, turtles may be transferred onto another vessel for transport to the release area to enable the relocation trawler to keep sweeping the dredge site without interruption. f. Take and Release Time During Trawling — Smalltooth Sawfish: Smalltooth sawfish shall be released immediately after capture, away from the dredge site or into already dredged areas,unless the trawl vessel is equipped with a suitable well-aerated seawater holding tank (e.g., plastic "kiddie pool" not less than Ift in depth by 5 ft in diameter), where a maximum of one sawfish may be held for not longer than 30 minutes before it must be released or relocated away from the dredge site. g. Injuries and Incidental Take Quota: Any protected species injured or killed during or as a consequence of relocation trawling shall count toward the incidental take quota. Minor skin abrasions resulting from trawl capture are considered non-injurious and still count towards the non-injurious incidental take quota. Injured sea turtles shall be immediately transported by Collier County and/or its representative at its xpense to the nearest sea turtle rehabilitation facility; all rehabilitation costs and sea turtle transportation costs shall be borne by Collier County. Page 19 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 24 of 34 h. C 1TTP: External flipper tag and PIT-tag data generated and collected by relocation trawlers shall also be submitted to the Cooperative Marine Turtle Tagging Program (CMTTP), on the appropriate CMTTP form, at the University of Florida's Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research. i. Tissue Sampling: All live or dead sea turtles captured by relocation trawling or dredging shall be tissue-sampled prior to release, according to the protocols described in Appendix II or Appendix III of the November 19, 2003, Gulf of Mexico Regional Biological Opinion on Hopper Dredging, as revised through Revision No. 2, included as Appendix 1 of the Biological Opinion. Tissue samples shall be sent within 60 days of capture to: NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Attn: Lisa Belskis. 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, Florida 33149, All data collected shall be submitted in electronic format within 60 working days to Lisa.Belskis@noaa.gov. The present opinion to BOEM serves as the permitting authority for any NMFS-approved endangered species observers aboard relocation trawlers or hopper dredges to tissue sample live- or dead-captured sea turtles, without the need for an ESA Section 10 pennil. 6. For the proposed action, 100 percent shipboard observer monitoring is required year-round. If conditions disallow 100 percent inflow screening, inflow screening can be reduced gradually, but 100 percent overflow screening is required, and an explanation must be included in the project report. The hopper's inflow screens should have 4-inch by 4-inch screening. If BOEM, in consultation with observers and the draghead operator, determines that the draghead is clogging and reducing production substantially, the screens may be modified sequentially: mesh size may be increased to 6-inch by 6-inch, then 9-inch by 9-inch, then 12-inch by 12-inch openings. NMFS believes that this flexible, graduated-screen option may be necessary since the need to constantly clear the inflow screens will increase the time it takes to complete the project; therefore, it will increase the exposure of sea turtles to the risk of'impingement or entrainment Inflow screen clogging should be greatly reduced with these flexible options; however, further clogging (e.g., as when encountering heavy clay or debris) may compel removal of the inflow screening altogether, in which case effective 100 percent overflow screening is mandatory. Collier County shall notify I3OEM beforehand if inflow screening is going to be reduced or eliminated, and provide details of how effective overflow screening will be achieved. No action to increase inflow screening should he completed until Collier County has BOEM/NMFS approval. NMFS, in consultation with the dredging company, Collier County, and BOEM, shall determine what constitutes effective overflow screening(RPM 4). 2. Collier County has further agreed to comply with portions of the NMFS' Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Saw ash Construction Conditions' (Appendix 3 of the "Lease of . Borrow Area 'Ti to the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department for the Collier County Beach Renourishment Project (Consultation Number SER-2012- 9274)): The permittee (i.e., Collier County and its agents and contractors) shall comply with the following protected species construction conditions: ' Note that these conditions exclude the Incidental Take Statement provided in the document. Page 20 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3`New Business 25 of 34 a. The permittee shall instruct all personnel associated with the project of the potential presence of these species and the need to avoid collisions with sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish. All construction personnel are responsible for observing water-related activities for the presence of these species. b. The permittee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing sea turtles or smalltooth sawfish, which are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. c. Siltation barriers shall be made of material in which a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish cannot become entangled, be properly secured, and be regularly monitored to avoid protected species entrapment. Barriers may not block sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish entry to or exit from designated critical habitat without prior agreement from the National Marine Fisheries Service's Protected Resources Division, St. Petersburg, Florida. d. All vessels associated with the construction project shall operate at "no wake/idle" speeds at all times while in the construction area and while in water depths where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four-foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will preferentially follow deep-water routes (e.g., marked channels)whenever possible. e. If a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within 100 yards of the active daily construction/dredging operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions shall be implemented to ensure its protection. These precautions shall include cessation of operation of any moving equipment closer than 50 feet of a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish. Operation of any mechanical construction equipment shall cease immediately if a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within a 50-ft radius of the equipment. Activities may not resume until the protected specks has departed the project area of its own volition. f. Any collision with and/or injury to a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish shall he reported immediately to the National Marine Fisheries Service's Protected Resources Division (727-824- 5312)and the local authorized sea turtle stranding/rescue organization. g. Any special construction conditions, required of your specific project, outside these general conditions, if applicable, will be addressed in the primary consultation. 3. Collier County will comply with the reasonable and prudent measures, and implementing terms and conditions, of NMFS' 2003 Gulf of Mexico regional biological opinion (GRBO) to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), as amended through Revision 2 dated January 9, 2007 (Appendices 1 and 2 of the "Lease of Borrow Area Ti to the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department for the Collier County Beach Renourishment Project (Consultation Number SER- 2012-9274)"): 1. Hopper Dredging: Hopper dredging activities in Gulf of Mexico waters from the Mexico-Texas border to Key West, Florida, up to one mile into rivers shall be completed, whenever possible, between December 1 and March 31, when sea turtle abundance is lowest throughout Gulf coastal waters. Hopper dredging of Key West channels are covered by the existing September 25, 1997,.RBO to the j USACEj's South Atlantic Division (SAD). Page 21 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 26 of 34 2. Non-hopper Type Dredging: Pipeline or hydraulic dredges, because they are not known to take turtles, must be used whenever possible between April 1 and November 30 in Gulf of Mexico waters up to one mile into rivers. This should be considered particularly in channels such as those associated with Galveston Bay and Mississippi River - Gulf Outlet (MR- GO), where lethal takes of endangered Kemp's ridleys have been documented during summer months, and Aransas Pass, where large numbers of loggerheads may be found during summer months. In the MR-GO, incidental takes and sightings of threatened loggerhead sea turtles have historically been highest during April and October. 3. Annual Reports: The annual summary report, discussed below (No. 9), must give a complete explanation of why alternative dredges (dredges other than hopper dredges) were not used for maintenance dredging of channels between April and November. 4. Observers: The County shall arrange for NMFS-approved protected species observers to be aboard the hopper dredges to monitor the hopper bin, screening. and dragheads for sea turtles and Gulf sturgeon and their remains. a. Brazos Santiago Pass east to Key West, Florida: Observer coverage sufficient for 100% monitoring (i.e., two observers) of hopper dredging operations is required aboard the hopper dredges year-round from Brazos Santiago Pass to (not including) Key West, Florida, between April 1 and November 30, and whenever surface water temperatures are 11 degrees C or greater. b. Observer coverage of hopper dredging of sand mining areas shall ensure 50% monitoring (i.e., one observer). c. Observers are not required at any time in Mississippi River - Southwest Pass (MRS W P). 5. Operational Procedures: During periods in which hopper dredges arc operating and NMFS-approved protected species observers are not required (as delineated in No. 4 above), the County must: a. Advise inspectors. operators, and vessel captains about the prohibitions on taking, banning, or harassing sea turtles. b. Instruct the captain of the hopper dredge to avoid any turtles and whales encountered while traveling between the dredge site and offshore disposal area, and to immediately contact the County if sea turtles or whales are seen in the vicinity. c. Notify NMFS if sea turtles are observed in the dredging area, to coordinate further precautions to avoid impacts to turtles. d. Notify NMFS immediately by phone (727/824-5312), fax (727/824-5309), or electronic mail (takereport.nmfsseriwnoaa.gov) if a sea turtle or Gulf sturgeon or any other threatened or endangered species is taken by the dredge. Page 22 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 27 of 34 6. Screening: When sea turtle observers are required on hopper dredges, 100% inflow screening of dredged material is required and 100% overflow screening is recommended. If conditions prevent 100% inflow screening, inflow screening may be reduced gradually, as further detailed in the following paragraph, but 100%overflow screening is then required. a. Screen Size: The hopper's inflow screens should have 4-inch by 4-inch screening. If BOEM, in consultation with USACE, determines that the draghead is clogging and reducing production substantially, the screens may be modified sequentially: mesh size may be increased to 6-inch by 6-inch, then 9-inch by 9-inch, then 12-inch by 12-inch openings. Clogging should be greatly reduced with these flexible options; however, further clogging may compel removal of the screening altogether, in which case effective 100% overflow screening is mandatory. The BOEM shall notify NMFS beforehand if inflow screening is going to be reduced or eliminated, and provide details of how effective overflow screening will be achieved. b. Need for Flexible, Graduated Screens: NMFS believes that this flexible, graduated screen option is necessary, since the need to constantly clear the inflow screens will increase the time it takes to complete the project and therefore increase the exposure of sea turtles to the risk of impingement or entrainment. Additionally, there are increased risks to sea turtles in the water column when the inflow is halted to clear screens, since this results in clogged intake pipes, which may have to be lifted from the bottom to discharge the clay by applying suction. e. Exemption - MR-SWP: Screening is not required at any time in Mississippi River—Southwest Pass (MR-SWP). 7. Dredging Pumps: Standard operating procedure shall be that dredging pumps shall be disengaged by the operator when the dragheads are not firmly on the bottom, to prevent impingement or entrainment of sea turtles within the water column. This precaution is especially important during the cleanup phase of dredging operations when the draghead frequently comes off the bottom and can suck in turtles resting in the shallow depressions between the high spots the draghead is trimming off 8. Sea Turtle Deflecting Draghead: A state-of-the-art rigid deflector draghead must he used on all hopper dredges in all Gulf of Mexico channels and sand mining sites at all times of the year except that the rigid deflector draghead is not required in MR-SWP at any time of the year. 9. Dredge Take Reporting: Observer reports of incidental take by hopper dredges must be faxed or e-mailed to NMFS' Southeast Regional Office [fax: (727) 824-5309; e-mail: takereport_nm.fsser'a noaa.gov] by onboard NMFS-approved protected species observers within 24 hours of any sea turtle, Gulf sturgeon,or other listed species take observed. A preliminary report summarizing the results of the hopper dredging and any documented sea turtle or Gulf sturgeon takes must be submitted to NMFS within 30 working days of completion of any dredging project. Reports shall contain information on project location (specific channel/area dredged), start-up and completion dates, cubic yards of material dredged, Page 23 of 30 March 12.2015 VIII-3'New Business 28 of 34 problems encountered, incidental takes and sightings of protected species, mitigative actions taken(if relocation trawling, the number and species of turtles relocated), screening type (inflow, overflow) utilized, daily water temperatures, name of dredge, names of endangered species observers, percent observer coverage,and any other information BOEM deems relevant. An annual report (based on fiscal year) must be submitted to NMFS summarizing hopper dredging projects and documented incidental takes. 10. Sea Turtle and Gulf Sturgeon Strandings: The County or its designated representative shall notify the Sea Turtle Stranding and Salvage Network (STSSN) state representative (contact information available at: http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/seaturtleSTSSN.jsp) of the start-up and completion of hopper dredging, bed-leveler dredging, and relocation trawling operations and ask to be notified of any sea turtle strandings in the project area that, in the estimation of STSSN personnel, bear signs of potential draghead impingement or entrainment, or interaction with a bed-leveling type dredge. Similarly, BOEM shall notify NMFS SERO PRD of any Gulf sturgeon strandings in the project area that, in the estimation of STSSN personnel, bear signs of potential draghead impingement or entrainment, or interaction with a bed-leveling type dredge. Information on any such strandings shall be reported in writing within 30 days of project completion to NMFS' Southeast Regional Office. Because the deaths of these turtles, if hopper dredge or bed-leveler dredge related, have already been accounted for in NMFS' jeopardy analysis,these strandings will not he counted against the [USACE]'s take limita. 11. Reporting- Strandings: BOEM shall provide NMFS' Southeast Regional Office with an annual report detailing incidents, with photographs when available, of stranded sea turtles and Gulf sturgeon that bear indications of draghead impingement or entrainment or any dredge-type interaction. This reporting requirement may be included in the end-of-year report required in Term and Condition No.9,above. 12. District Annual Relocation Trawling Report: BOEM shall provide NMFS' Southeast Regional Office with end-of-project reports within 30 days of completion of relocation trawling projects, and an annual report summarizing relocation trawling efforts and results within their District. The annual report requirement may be included in the end-of-year report required in Term and Condition No, 9, above. 13. Conditions Requiring Relocation Trawling: Handling of sea turtles and Gulf sturgeon captured during relocation trawling in association with hopper dredging projects in Gulf of Mexico navigation channels and sand mining areas shall be conducted by NMFS approved protected species observers, Relocation trawling shall be undertaken by the County or its contractor at all projects where any of the following conditions are met; however, other ongoing projects not meeting these conditions are not required to conduct relocation trawling: a. Two or more turtles are taken in a 24-hour period in the project. b. Four or more turtles are taken in the project. c. 75% of any of the incidental take limits, including per species limits, specified in Section 8.1, has previously been met. 4 Note that the Incidental"take Statement and take limit of the GRRO does not apply. The Incidental Take Statement and limits in the Biological Opinion summarized above apply to the project. Page 24 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 29 of 34 14. Relocation Trawling Waiver: For individual projects BOI..;M may request by letter to NMFS a waiver of part or all of the relocation trawling requirements. NMFS will consider these requests and decide favorably if the evidence is compelling. 15. Relocation Trawling- Annual Take Limits): Relocation trawling, and handling of those captured threatened or endangered species by NMFS-approved protected species observers, in association with all relocation trawling conducted or contracted by the four Gulf of Mexico [USACE] Districts to temporarily reduce or assess the abundance of these listed species during, and in the 0-3 days immediately preceding, a hopper dredging or bed-leveling project in order to reduce the possibility of lethal hopper dredge or bed-leveler interactions, subject to the following conditions: a. Trawl Time: Trawl tow-time duration shall not exceed 42 minutes (doors in — doors out) and trawl speeds shall not exceed 3.5 knots. h. Handling During Trawling: Sea turtles and Gulf sturgeon captured pursuant to relocation trawling shall be handled in a manner designed to ensure their safety and viability, and shall be released over the side of the vessel, away from the propeller, and only after ensuring that the vessel's propeller is in the neutral, or disengaged, position (i.e., not rotating). Resuscitation guidelines are found in Appendix IV of the 2007 NMFS BO. c. Captured Turtle and Gulf Sturgeon Holding Conditions: Turtles and Gulf sturgeon may be held briefly for the collection of important scientific measurements, prior to their release. Captured sea turtles shall be kept moist, and shaded whenever possible, until they are released, according to the requirements of Terms and Conditions (T&C) 15-e, below. Captured Gulf sturgeon shall he held in a suitable wen-aerated seawater enclosure until they are released, according to the conditions of T&C 15-f, below. d. Scientific Measurements: When safely possible, all turtles shall be measured (standard carapace measurements including body depth), tagged, weighed, and a tissue sample taken prior to release. When safely possible, all Gulf sturgeon shall be measured (fork length and total length), tagged, weighed, and a tissue sample taken prior to release. Any external tags shall be noted and data recorded into the observers log. Only NMFS- approved protected species observers or observer candidates in training under the direct supervision of a NMFS-approved protected species observer may conduct the tagging/rneasuring/weighing/tissue sampling operations. NMFS-approved protected species observers may conduct more invasive scientific procedures (e.g., blood letting, laparoscopies, anal and gastric lavages, mourning satellite or radio transmitters, etc.) and partake in or assist in "piggy back" research projects but only if the observer holds a valid federal sea turtle or Gulf sturgeon research permit (and any required state permits) authorizing the activities, either as the permit holder, or as ` This GRBO included a take statement for relocation trawling which does not apply to activities conducted under this Collier County Lesac. Please see page 17 alibis Lease for the takes anticipated for this project,as described in the BOEM- NMFS Biological Opinion specific to this lease and activities conducted pursuant to this Lease. Page 25 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 30 of 34 designated agent of the permit holder, and has first notified NMFS' Southeast Regional Office, Protected Resources Division. e. Take and Release Time During Trawling - Turtles: Turtles shall be kept no longer than 12 hours prior to release and shall be released not less than 3 (three) nautical miles (nmi) from the dredge site. If two or more released turtles are later recaptured, subsequent turtle captures shall be released not less than 5 (five) ntni away. If it can be done safely and without injury to the turtle, turtles may be transferred onto another vessel for transport to the release area to enable the relocation trawler to keep sweeping the dredge site without interruption. f. Take and Release Time During Trawling- Gulf Sturgeon: Gulf sturgeon shall he released immediately after capture, away from the dredge site or into already dredged areas, unless the trawl vessel is equipped with a suitable well-aerated seawater holding tank, container, trough, or pool where a maximum of one fish may he held for not longer than 30 minutes before it must be released or relocated away from the dredge site. g. Injuries and Incidental Take Limits: Any protected species injured or killed during or as a consequence of relocation trawling shall count toward the Gulf-wide limit for injurious or lethal takes during relocation trawling (0-2 sea turtles and 0-1 Gulf sturgeon per fiscal year). Minor skin abrasions resulting from trawl capture are considered non-injurious. Injured sea turtles shall be immediately transported to the nearest sea turtle rehabilitation facility. h. Turtle Flipper External Tagging: All sea turtles captured by relocation trawling shall be flipper-tagged prior to release with external tags which shall be obtained prior to the project from the University of Florida's Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research. This opinion serves as the permitting authority for any NMES-approved protected species observer aboard these relocation trawlers to flipper-tag with external-type tags (e.g., Inconel tags) captured sea turtles. Columbus crabs or other organisms living on external sea turtle surfaces may also be sampled and removed under this authority. i. PIT Tagging: This opinion serves as the permitting authority for any NMFS approved protected species observer aboard a relocation trawler to PIT-tag captured sea turtles and Gulf sturgeon. PIT tagging of sea turtles and Gulf sturgeon is not required to be done, if the NMFS-approved protected species observer does not have prior training or experience in said activity; however, if the observer has received prior training in PIT tagging procedures,then the observer shall PIT tag the animal prior to release(in addition to the standard external tagging): Sea turtle PIT tagging must then be performed in accordance with the protocol detailed at NMFS' Southeast Fisheries Science Center's Web page: http://www.selse.noaa.,oviseaturdelisheriesobservers.jsp rv%seaturllefisheriesobse rvers.jsp (See Appendix on. SEFSC's "Fisheries Observers" Web page); Gulf sturgeon Pl"T tagging must then be performed in accordance with the protocol detailed at the NMFS SERO PRD Web site address: Page 26 of 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 31 of 34 het „_'w ro,it .tf n„4;,i ;I,� J t.i,ty •tlitr;. PIT tags used must be sterile, incur iduall - vrapped tags to prevent disease transmission. PIT tags should be 125-k11r,encapsulated tags the smallest ones made. Note: scanning reveals a PI 1 tag and it was not difficult to find. then do not insert another PH' tag: simply record the tag number and location, and frequency. if ktwrrrt. If for somc reason the tag is difficult to detect le.,g.. tag is embedded deep in muscle, car is a 4i)i)-kl lr tag), then insert one in the ether shoulder, j. Other Sampling Prxa+_'eduri . All other togging and external or internal sampling procedures (e.g.. blood letting. laparoscopies. anal and gastrie larages, mounting satellite or radio transmitters, etc.) performed on live sea turtles or live Gulf sturgeon are not permitted under this .opinion unless the observer holds a valid sea turtle sturgeon research permit authorizing the activity. either as the permit holder. designated agent of the permit holder. k. NT-Tag.ticwrnr,tttr erne/Date,Viibrtti.,,sloe equi,'crrreut.s. Al! sea tuatIcs and (roll sturgeon captured by relocation trawling or dredges shall be thoroughly scanned t)r the presence of PI 1' tags prior to release using a multi-frequency scanner powerful enough to read multiple frequencies (including 125-, I 28-. 134-, and 400-kI1z tags) and read tags deeply embedded in muscle tissue te.g., manufactured by -1 rovuru Bionaat'k. or As°iJJI. Turtles ;chose scans show they have been previously PIT tagged shall nevertheless be externally, flipper tagged. Sea turtle data collected (PII tag scan data and external tagging data) shall be submitted to N(tAA. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast fish; vies Science C'enter. :\ttn: Lisa 13elskis., 75 Virginia !leach t,rire. Miami. I lerida 33149. All sea turtle data collected -hall be submitted in electronic format rstibia (jt) days of project completion to ,, 1� 1 l}� r � a R �y and l,c t )i� ' pgct � ;(iio:1 a,��e�r. Sea turtle external dipper tag and Pt I tag data generated and col Iected by relocation trtawlet shall also he submitted to the Cooperative Marine:.. Turtle 'I agging Program tC NI`J`i'P i, on the appropriate CM'I'I`P form, at the I'nisersity of Florida's Archie Carr Center lot Sea Turtle Research, (hill sturgeon data (P11 tag scan data and external tagging data shall he submitted within OIl days c-f project completion to NC),\A, National Marine Fisheries Service, Protected 'Resources Division, 263 F3th sa rue South, St. Petersburg. Florida 77111, or by fro.:: ('.:7) S`24-52Nu0: orbs e-mail Attn: Dr. Stephana iiolderi. 1. Ile r,elIw, Fibro/;upi//unretu.o' Turtles: `> lFS-uappru'rcd proieefce species observers are not required to handle or sample viral tihropapillania tumors if they believe there is a health hazard to themselves and choose not to, When handling sea turtles infocted with iibropapil lama tumors, observers must either: I ) ('lean all equipment that comes in contact rritli the turtle (tagging equipnment, tape measures, etc.) with mild bleach solrnion, between the processing, of each turtle or 2) maintain a separate set ol tiara pl:rig equipment for handling animals displaying nhropapillorna tumors or lesions. l0. Requirt'mrant urea Authority to Conduct I)s.sire .Suniplirap /Or (tear/k' ,'tnealasa') This opinion series as the permitting authority for ems N I'S-approved protected species observer Page 27 of 0 March 12,2015 VIII-3'New Business 32 of 34 aboard a reloeation trawler or Topper dredge to tissue-sample live- or dead captured sea turtles, and live-or dead-captured Gulf sturgeon. Yvithout the need for an ESA section 10 perniit. All live c+r dead sea turtles and Gulf sturgeon captures) by relocation trawling and hopper dredging (for both ILS:ACk<)-conducted and jt.`SACI:j-permitted activities) shall be tissue- s anpicd prior to release. Samphl.c shah continue uninterrupted until such time as NMI'S determines !and notifies the Il:SAC I in \vriting that it has sufficient sample~ froth specific areas across the Gull.of 11ex ico in order to obtain reliable gen iic information on the nesting or sub- population identity of sea turtles and Cult'sturgeon being captured or lethally taken. to inlprtl\C the effectiveness of future ci,nsttltatittnti. Sca turtle tissue supple` shall be taken in nccord,ance• with N*,11 S` Southeast Fisheries Science Center's (SEFSC) procedures ',Or sea turtle genetic anal)scs. I he County or its contractor shall ensure than tissue samples taken during a dretigin ( project ore collected told Stored properly and mailed within 00 days oldie completion of their dredging project to: NO:A.1. National ?larine iisheries Service. Southeast Fisheries Science Center. Attn: l,istr 13cI Lis, 75 Virginia I eeh Drive. Miami, Florida 33149. Gulf sturgeon tissue samples (Lc_ in clips or barbel clips) shall he taken in accordance with iNM1'S SERO's Protected Resources Ditiision's (lull' Sturgeon Tissue Sampling Piotocol found at the NNIFS SFR() PR F) Web site address: luip.1:seroannrs.noatt.govipr/protres.htm. the County or its contractor shall ensure that tissue samplcs taken during a dredging project arc collected and stored properly and mailed to SIF:RO PRI) (Attn: Dr. Siephania Bolden) within Ott days of the completion of their dredging project. 17, /h..v.,6.;!"UI[ud f3i, icr" wi)es: All dri i;:,,ing in sand minim:. areas Al"ill be desi'ei'-d to ensure that dredeing will not occur within a minimum tat 400 feet Crow any significant h rdground areas or bottom structures that serve us :attractants to sea turtles ;Or )'oscine or shelter. Ns1FS considers (for the purposes of this opinion only) a signilieant harderuunti in a project area to he one that, over a horitontal distance of 150 feet, has an average elevation above the sand of 1.5 feet or gre.tter, and has aiLae on It. The Cbuntr or its coral-trctot Si;:ill ensure that sand mining sites within their f)i.stricts are adequately mapped to enable the dredge to stay at least 40(1 feet from these areas. ll the County or its contractor is uncertain as to what constitutes significance. it shall request that 13()EM consult with NM1hS Sk.RO Habitat Conservation Division (727-824-5317) and N vll'S' Protected Resources D vision (727-824- 5312) li)r clarification and gukianee. Walls of federal)\ \--maintained navigation channels, and jetties and other such man-made structures, arc not considered harduround,s for the purpose of this opinion, 18. Training - Perm-mac/ on iilippc1' 1 he County or its contractor n us`i enstue that all contracted personnel invoked in operatingt hopper dredges (whether privately-funded of federally-funded projects) receive thorough training Ott pleasure~ cif dredge operat 011 that trill minimize takes of sea turtles. It shall he the goat or each hopper dredging operation to estahlisli operating procedures that arc consistent with those that have been used successfully during hopper dredging in other regions ;f time coastal United States, and +shit), hatie proven cl`c'eti\e in rectteing turtle dredge interactions. "I beret re, [1.S AC1-:] Ent ineerinyg Research and I)evelopment Center experts or other persons with expertise in this matter shall be involticd both Pace 2$ ot.30 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 33 of 34 in dredge operation training. tied installation. adjustment. and monitoring of the rigid deflector drrghead aswtribly. 19. I)rtrlgo I.i shin,: From \-lay I through October 31, sea turtle nesting aid cnleraence season, all lighting aboard hopper dredges and hopper dredge pumpout barges operating sti itllin 3 nrni of s I turtle: nesting beaehe':s shall be limited to the nminimal h hunt: neeessiny to comply with U.S. Coast Guard and/or 0511A requirements. it nonessential lighting on the dredge and pumps ut barge shrill be minimized through reduction shielding, lowering, inc appropriate placement of lights to mininti/e illumination of the water to reduce potential disorientation effects on female sea turtles approaching the nesting bCaches and sea turtle hatchlings nuking their Lstiv seaward from their natal beaches. 4. Collier County will comply with tiNFFS`s Southeast Region b'ecce/Strike Avoidance Meusrrres and Reporting fdr,llariners(revised February 2008 !Appendix 4 of the "Lease of Borrow Area TI to the Collier County Parks and Recreation 1)epartrnent for the Collier C'ount Beach Renourishnrcnt Project (Consultation Number 'd R- 2012-9274)` 1) Vessel Strike Avoidance: In order to avoid causing injury or death to marine mammals and sea turtles the fkillow ; measures should be taken when consistent with sate navigation: I. Vessel operators and crews shall maintain a vigilant winch liar marine mammals and sea turtles to avoid striking sighted protected species. 2. When whales are sighted, maintain a distance of 100 yards or greater between the whale and the vessel, 3. When sea turtles or smull cetaceans are sighted. attempt to maintain a distance (4'50 yards or Lore itcr between the animal and the vessel whenever possible. 4. When small cettie-eans ter.:sighted hilc a vetstisel is undeiv5 i (c.>., how-riding) titteMpt to remain parallel to the animal's course. Avoid excessive speed or abrupt changes in direction until the cetacean has left the are 1. 5. Red:Ice vessel speed to 10 knots or less when mother:calf pairs, groups, or large assemblages of cetaceans are observed near an underway vessel, when safety permits. A single cetacean at the surface may indicate the presence of submerged animals in the t ieinity, therefore, prudent precautionary measures should always be exercised. `t he vessel shall attempt to route around the animals, maintaining a minimum distance of 100 yards w henever possible. b. Whales may surface in unpredictable locations or approach slowly moving vessels. When an animal is sighted in the vessel's path or in close proximity to a moving vessel and \tihen safety permits, reduce speed and shift the engine to neutral. loo not engage the engines until the animals are clear ol'the area. Additional Requirements for the North Atlantic Right Whale: Page 29 el 30 March 12,2015 VIII-3*New Business 34 of 34 1. IIa sighted whale is believed to he a North Atlantic right whale. federal regulation requires a minimum distance of 500 yards he maintained from the animal t50 C1:;It 224.103 (e)1. 2. Vessels entering North Atlantic right whale critical habitat a re required to report into the Mandatory Ship Report ne System. 3. Mariners shall check with various communication media for general information regarding a‘oiding ship strikes and specific information regarding North ,\tiantic right \,ha{le sighting locations. These include NC)A;\ weather radio. IJ.S. (.'oast Guard NAV Cl . broadcasts. and Notices to Mariners. Commercial mariners calling on United States ports should view the most recent version of the NO \A`,'I;SE'(i produced training (1) entitled "A Prudent Mariner's (itrid to Right Whale Protection" (contact the N FS Southeast Region. Protected Resources I)i\ision for more information regarding the (..Th. 4. Injured,dead.or entangled right whales should he immediately reported to the 1 .S. Coast Guard via VIII" Channel 16. Injured or Dead Protected Species Reporting,: Vessel crews shall report sightings of an\' injured or dead protected species inrmeuialely. r'eeardle:s of \\hether the injury or death is caused by . our vessel. Report marine mammas to Southeast 1,.S, Stranding Iiodine: 877-433-8209, Report sea turtles to the NM";'S Southeast Regional Orrice: 727-824-5312. lithe injury or death cal a marine mammal was caased by a collision with your vessel. responsible parties shall remain a]l'aitable w assist the respei:to.e salvage and stranding network as needed. NM1'S' Southeast Regional Orrice sha''1 imni di itt!.1V' notified i.TI the strike b) im iil (I tt.;', c t��t k T� t.P �1I c i,l r"��Yt us.ing the attached vessel strike reporting form. Prge 0 of 30 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4 New Business 1 of 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For information and review of the South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project 2014 One Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report OBJECTIVE: For information and review only. CONSIDERATIONS: This report describes the performance of the 2013 South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project in the first year after construction and is required under.1CP permit number 0235209-003-JC. The Contractor, Cavache Inc., mobilized to the work area March 1, 2013 and completed demobilization by April 30, 2013. According to surveys conducted by Cavache, approximately 77,800 cubic yards of material was excavated from the Caxambas Pass borrow area and placed within the pay template. Over 80,000 cubic yards of material was placed with the permitted fill area between FDEP monuments R-146 and G-4. Fill placement began at the southern groin at G- 4 and extended northward approximately 400 feet south of R-146 along approximately 2,300 feet of shoreline (CEC, 2013). The 2014 South Marco Island monitoring study is comprised of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) monuments R-139 through R-148, which is located on the north side of Caxambas Pass. Monuments G-1 through G-5, which are located just north of Caxambas Pass in the groin areas and round the bend into the pass, and K-1 and K-2, located on Kice Island, were also surveyed as part of the monitoring effort. The 2014 monitoring area extends from R-139, south of Tigertail Beach, to G-5, at the south end of Marco Island, and encompasses the entire reach of the South Marco Island Beach. Additionally, two profile lines located on Kice Island, K-1 and K-2, were monitored. A monitoring survey of Caxambas Pass was also performed for this monitoring report. The 2014 South Marco Island one year post-construction monitoring survey indicates that the beaches within the project and monitoring areas are accreting significantly after the 2013 nourishment event. In the past year, all three monitoring areas performed well showing overall volumetric gains. Relative to shoreline changes the area north of the project area showed significant shoreline advances. Within the project area from R-147 to G-1 significant shoreline retreat occurred. Volume calculations show that the total project area is 106% of its post- construction volume and the total monitoring area is 214% of its post-construction volume. Beach Width I. North of Project Area (R-139 to R-146) April 2013 to August 2014 - The shorelines along these eight profiles experienced an average advance of 20.4 feet, with a maximum advance of 48.6 feet at R-139 and a minimum advance of 2.4 feet at R-145. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4 New Business 2 of 2 2. Project Area (R-146 to G-4) - Over the last year the entire project area has recognized shoreline erosion. The average shoreline change over for the project area from April 2013 to August 2014 showed a recession of 39.9 feet. The shoreline change for the project area ranged from 93.2 feet of recession at G-1 to 9.2 feet of recession at G-3. The three profiles within the project area that are showing the largest shoreline retreats are R- 147 through G-1, with losses ranging from 40.4 to 93.2 feet. Beach Volume 1. Over the last year, all profiles in the monitoring area north of the project area have accreted with a total volumetric gain of 94,026 cubic yards. All profiles gained significant material with the lowest gain being 6,991 cubic yards between R-143 and R- 144 and the largest gain from R-140 to R-141 with 23,174 cubic yards. The volumetric change data trends reflect the same trends as the shoreline change data within this monitoring area. The accretion of volume within this area is consistent with historic volumetric changes along this stretch of shoreline. This area is known to be an area where accretion naturally occurs. 2. The project area, from R-146 to G-4, remained very stable with losses only occurring between R-147 and R-148 (7,823 cubic yards). All other areas showed accretion. The net volumetric change for the project area for the past year shows a gain of 4,633 cubic yards of material. The volumetric changes for the project area range from 7,823 cubic yards of loss between R-143 and R-144 and 5,267 cubic yards of gain between R-146 and R-147. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the Fiscal Impact. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. RECOMMENDATION: For Information and review of the South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project 2014 One Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.B., J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Department Attachments: Monitoring Report CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 1 of 20 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT 2014 ONE YEAR POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING REPORT Prepared For: Collier County—Coastal Zone Management Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail W. Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite 103 Naples, FL 34112 >i c x • Prepared By: Atkins 4030 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 700 Tampa,FL February 2015 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4'New Business 2 of 20 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT 2014 ONE YEAR POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report evaluates the performance of the South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project one year after construction. The dredge and fill renourishment activities occurred between February and April 2013. The Mean High Water (MHW) shoreline changes and volume changes since the nourishment project are summarized by their respective beach extents below. In the past year, the beaches within the project area were stable with respect to the volume retained, while only losing about 600 cubic yards of material throughout the project reach. An overall average shoreline retreat was seen within the project area; however the material was kept nearshore so the volumes did not see the full effect of the shoreline change. The total volume within the project area is 99% of the April 2013 survey volume remaining post-construction. Average Mean High Water Shoreline Changes (feet) Feb. 2013 to Feb. 2013 to April 2013 to April 2013 Aug. 2014 Aug. 2014 North of Fill (R-139 to R-146) 11.0 31.4 20.4 Project Area(R-146 to G-4) 80.7 40.8 -39.9 South of Fill (G-4 to G-5) 14.5 6.1 -8.4 Kice Island (K-2 to K-1) -10.5 2.3 12.8 Volume Remaining/Changes (cubic yards) Feb. 2013 to Feb. 2013 to April 2013 to April 2013 Aug. 2014 Aug. 2014 North ofFill (R-139 to R-146) -4,570 89,610 94,026 Project Area (R-146 to G-4) 82,054 89,807 4,633 South of Fill (G-4 to G-5) 3,809 6,169 2,360 Kice Island (K-2 to K-1) -14,046 19,964 32,187 TOTAL 67,247 205,550 133,206 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4`New Business 3 of 20 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISIIMENT PROJECT 2014 ONE YEAR POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. PROFILE AND IIYDROGRAPIIIC SURVEYS 4 III. SHORELINE WIDTH AND CHANGES 6 A. Introduction 6 B. Monitoring Areas 6 i. North of Project Area (R-139 to R-146) 6 ii. Project Area (R-146 to G-4) 6 iii. South of Project Area/Groin and Breakwater Area (G-4 to G-5) 7 iv. Kice Island(K-2 to K-1) 7 1V. VOLUME CHANGES 9 A. Introduction 9 B. Monitoring Areas 10 i. North of Project Area (R-139 to R-146) 10 i. Project Area (R-146 to G-4) 10 ii. South of Project Area/Groin and Breakwater Area (G-4 to G-5) 11 iii. Kice Island(K-2 to K-1) 11 V. PROJECT PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 14 VI. CAXAMBAS PASS 15 VII. SUMMARY 15 VIII. REFERENCES 16 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location Map 2 Figure 2. Project Area Map(CEC, 2013) 3 Figure 3. South Marco Island Added Beach Widths Remaining 9 Figure 4. Volumetric Changes(CY) 13 Figure 5. Beach Width Design Description 14 Figure 6. South Marco Island Project Performance 15 r:, CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 4 of 20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. 2014 MI-1W Shoreline Changes and Added Beach Widths(ft) 8 Table 2. 2014 Volumetric Changes and Volume Remaining(CY) 12 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Comparative Profiles Appendix B. Caxambas Pass Borrow Area Survey Map CAC March 12.2015 VIII-4*New Business 5 of 20 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT 2014 ONE YEAR POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING REPORT 1. INTRODUCTION This report describes the performance of the 2013 South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project in the first year after construction and is required under JCP permit number 0235209- 003-JC. The Contractor, Cavache Inc., mobilized to the work area March 1, 2013 and completed demobilization by April 30, 2013. According to surveys conducted by Cavache, approximately 77,800 cubic yards of material was excavated from the Caxambas Pass borrow area and placed within the pay template and over 80,000 cubic yards of material was placed with the permitted fill area between FDEP monuments R-146 and G-4. Fill placement began at the southern groin at G-4 and extended northward approximately 400 feet south of R-146 along approximately 2,300 feet of shoreline (CEC, 2013). The project's remaining effectiveness is assessed in terms of shoreline and volumetric changes through August of 2014. Results of the shoreline and volumetric change analyses are summarized in this report through tables and figures. Table 1: Survey Timeline Survey Date Pre-Construction February 2013 Post-Construction April 2013 One Year Post Construction Monitoring August 2014 The 2014 South Marco Island monitoring study is comprised of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) monuments R-139 through R-148, which is located on the north side of Caxambas Pass. Monuments G-1 through G-5, which are located just north of Caxambas Pass in the groin areas and round the bend into the pass, and K-1 and K-2, located on Kice Island, were also surveyed as part of the monitoring effort. The 2014 monitoring area extends from R-139, south of Tigertail Beach, to G-5, at the south end of Marco Island, and encompasses the entire reach of the South Marco Island Beach. Additionally, two profile lines located on Kice Island, K-1 and K-2, were monitored. A monitoring survey of Caxambas Pass was also performed for this monitoring report. A location map depicting the project and monitoring areas is included as Figure 1 (Humiston & Moore, 2008). 1 1 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 6 of 20 Figure 1. Location Map i ,f • I .y � r•#4 h,;��;.. —1k t y� •)'• t irk i q, N. � ,0,;(1...- s�' p{..q M , . it.• 4 ./ i ". c„,,„ Ax. . . (!i i‘=".. L. •R J1ky1 l COWER 1 i..•I — Is__ �' ",..1,11...A _ ..4 i \• •` W ""tp, ......!`"? J�' P •y. +' t. N ` I5LANU i r ..k, !GATE P40175AAy: JIMUAO 2907. P49TOGRO H ►ROPER" Cr (31.1.1F+ G+OU*T, NP5 AP° u rcE. AP- « g ivy?•'i• • ,`yt+ .TM1 =' � �V�O• to,^J T:•y�r ! 1 i •nn • i> ' r ; M i '1,,.. 4_ - , _ \ -. , fi 4.4 \,_ BDRR AA A pRCa rCT .t- , AREA �! �. a $ ' r! • 1 N-' r,� • -, per$ :• �; " :'1"=5111001 4 ...... ATKINS 2 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4`New Business 7 of 20 Figure 2. Project Area Map (CEC, 2013) i • '0 C)Mk co NI;•ip.., 0l f Q cc z er •w � A ''' Lu rt r . S� �` , .2 1- 4 . LL 0 C7 T _ 1-- s., 4 h.''' ' illy„shi''' 4 , cn< 0 ., . s ..00.. ,:s z ‹c T.,, w . . . .4 -..ir, ,,, Atir CO w ca ____,--1.--'0 a .t, _ I-;-; ' f M. 1 r '' -___-.,_ v" --ow bt `- ://2f/./ ,/ CO / a f m ui uQ ppjjjI z z r 5 / °' vit ATKINS 3 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 8 of 20 IL PROFILE AND HYDROGRAPIIIC SURVEYS The annual physical monitoring of South Marco Island is comprised of topographic and hydrographic surveys along each monument azimuth of the beach and offshore areas. This data is required for Collier County and the FDEP to continually observe and assess beach conditions. The annual monitoring surveys are needed to observe the performance of beach nourishment projects and assess these projects' affects on adjacent shorelines. The scientific monitoring process also provides information necessary to plan, design and optimize future nourishment projects. For the 2014 monitoring, topographic and hydrographic surveys were conducted for 14 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) monuments R-139 through R-148, G-1 through G-5 and K-1 through K-2. Surveyors from Morgan & Eklund, Inc. (M&E) conducted the topographic and hydrographic surveys for monuments R-139 through K-2 in August 2014. All vertical elevations from the 2014 survey are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) and all horizontal data is referenced to the Florida State Plane Coordinate System, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/90 (NAD 83/90). Onshore beach profiles were collected along the azimuths as shown in the FDEP control tabulation using differential leveling for elevation and a hand-held laser for stationing. Coordinate values for the FDEP range monuments were supplied by FDEP and verified by RTK/GPS during a previous survey. Where FDEP R-monuments were not found, RTK/GPS was used to set control along the profile alignment. Stations (ranges) along the profile lines were measured with a hand held laser (+/- 0.5'). Elevations for the onshore profile line were based on the two RTK/GPS points set on line or from the range monuments value supplied by MEP and verified during a previous survey. The beach profile crew measured the elevations along the profile alignment at 25 foot intervals and breaks in slope from the monument offshore to —6 feet NAVD 88. Data was also collected along the profile line from the monument landward to building line, roadway or dense vegetation (up to 200 feet east of monument). The elevation data was obtained using an automatic level and fiberglass rod. A laser was used to obtain station measurements from the monument to the rod. When the profile line was complete, the level loop was closed from the beach back to the FDEP monument using differential leveling. The beach profiles extend about 300 feet into the water to allow for overlap with the offshore profile obtained using the survey boat. The horizontal positioning for the hydrographic survey relied upon Real-time Kinematic GPS. Offshore profile data collection performed to FDEP specifications by Morgan & Eklund, Inc. utilized a 26' Parker survey vessel, Trimble DSM 232 Real-Time Kinematic correction receiver, Odom CVM Digital Survey Fathometer, TSS Motion Compensator and Hypack Navigation _1 9 4 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 9 of 20 Software for data collection. Calibration of the fathometer (depth sounder) involved adjusting for vessel squat and settlement while underway, vessel draft, and the speed of sound in water (bar check). Both analog and digital fathomer readings were calibrated at the beginning and end of each survey day and after replacing paper charts. The horizontal positioning for the offshore portion of the profile lines on August 26, 2014 relied on Real-time Kinematic GPS, with the GPS base station receiver base set on 333 (M&E IRC). Elevations for the offshore portion of the profile lines for the project area relied on Real-time Kinematic tide files and were verified with a tide staff and tide gauge set at M&E 11/332 with an elevation of 8.42 feet NAVD 88 on August 26, 2014. The survey boat navigated along each transect using the steering indicator in Hypack and the coordinates and depth soundings were simultaneously collected every 25 feet along the profile line. 5 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 10 of 20 III. SHORELINE WIDTII AND CHANGES A. Introduction The shoreline location of each profile in this analysis is taken to be the position of the measured Mean High Water (MHW) elevation. The high-tide mark on the beach is used as the approximate shoreline. For South Marco Island the MHW elevation is approximately +0.44 feet NAVD 88. Shoreline change values between the pre-construction in survey (February 2013) and the present survey (August 2014) are included in Table 2, along with the shoreline change values from the post-construction survey (April 2013) to the present survey. The total added beach widths remaining for the post-construction survey in April of 2013 and the present one-year post construction survey in August 2014, compared to the pre-construction survey in February 2013, are reported in this table and depicted in Figure 3. The February 2013 survey is used as the pre- construction survey and the April 2013 survey is used as the post-construction survey. B. Monitoring Areas i. North of Project Area (R-139 to R-146) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the past year, the entire monitoring area north of the project area (R-139 to R-146) has shown seaward advance. The shorelines along these eight profiles experienced an average advance of 20.4 feet, with a maximum advance of 48.6 feet at R-139 and a minimum advance of 2.4 feet at R-145. February 2013 to August 2014 The beaches in the area to the north of the project fill area have all advanced significantly since the pre-construction survey in February 2013 largely due to the renourishment project. The average shoreline advance for this area is approximately 36.1 feet. All profiles have shown significant seaward advances; however the profiles to the north of this area (R-139 to R-141) have gained the most beach, with added beach width remaining values of over 40 feet. R-145 shows the smallest shoreline advance with 8.5 feet of added beach width remaining. ii. Project Area (R-146 to G-4) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the last year the entire project area has recognized shoreline erosion. The average shoreline change over for the project area from April 2013 to August 2014 showed a recession of 39.9 feet. The shoreline change for the project area ranged from 93.2 feet of 6 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 11 of 20 recession at G-1 to 9.2 feet of recession at G-3. The three profiles within the project area that are showing the largest shoreline retreats are R-147 through G-1, with losses ranging from 40.4 to 93.2 feet. February 2013 to August 2014 Since the pre-construction survey in February 2013, the shoreline within the project area has experienced an average accretion which indicates that material from the renourishment project still remains within the project area. Within the area from R-146 to G-4 the shoreline has an average of 40.8 feet of added beach width remaining. This shows that there is still significant material present from the 2013 renourishment. iii. South of Project Area/Groin and Breakwater Area (G-4 to G-5) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the last year, the area south of the project area from G-4 to G-5 showed an average shoreline recession of 8.4 feet. G-4 showed a shoreline recession of 19.6 feet while G-5 showed a slight shoreline advance of 2.8 feet. February 2013 to August 2014 Since the pre-construction survey in 2013, the monitoring area to the south of the project area has an average beach width remaining of 6.1 feet. Both of the profiles south of the project area showed advance. iv. Kice Island (K-2 to K-1) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the last year, the profiles located south of Caxambas Pass on Kice Island from K-1 to K-2 showed an average net shoreline advance of 12.8 feet. K-1, which is the northern profile of the two, showed a shoreline advancement of 18.2 feet, while K-2, toward the southern end of Kice Island, showed a shoreline retreat of 7.3 feet, as an onshore beach shelf began to level out within the past year. February 2013 to August 2014 Since the pre-construction survey in February 2013, Kice Island has shown an overall average shoreline advance of 2.3 feet. K-1 showed a shoreline advance of 9.6 feet while K-2 showed a shoreline retreat of-5.0 feet. 7 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4`New Business 12 of 20 Table 1. 2014 MHW Shoreline Changes and Added Beach Widths (ft) Added Beach Width Shoreline Remaining(FT) Change(FT) Range Monument Feb. 2013 to Feb. 2013 to April 2013 to April 2013 Aug. 2014 Aug. 2014 R-139 5.0 53.6 48.6 R-140 4.5 43.2 38.7 R-141 19.9 51.8 31.9 R-142 19.8 34.7 14.9 R-143 19.3 23.5 4.1 R-144 -0.2 9.8 10.0 R-145 6.1 8.5 2.4 _ R-146 13.6 _ 26.0 12.4 R-147 95.1 54.8 -40.4 R-148 126.6 69.1 -57.5 G-1 129.1 35.9 -93.2 G-2 46.7 27.3 -19.5 G-3 59.8 50.5 -9.2 G-4 26.7 7.1 -19.6 G-5 2.3 5.0 2.8 CAXAMBAS PASS K-2 -12.3 -5.0 7.3 K-1 -8.6 9.6 18.2 -AVERAGES PER REACH- - NORTH OF FILL AREA 11.0 31.4 20.4 R-139 to R-146 PROJECT AREA 80.7 40.8 -39.9 R-146+400 to G-4 _ SOUTH OF FILL/GROINS 14.5 6.1 -8.4 G-4 to G-5 _ KICE ISLAND -10.5 2.3 12.8 K-i to K-2 MONITORING AREA 32.6 29.7 -2.8 R-139 to K-1 ATKINS 8 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4"'New Business 13 of 20 Figure 3. South Marco Island Added Beach Widths Remaining ADDED BEACH WIDTH REMAINING South Marco Island and Kice Island(R-139 to K-1) -Feb.2013 to April 22013 -Fe b.2013to Aug.2014 - 140 I I I I I I I I I . . �. i ._ __ __ ._I.. - f .__.. 120 I I I I I L.. 1 100 P. I 1 1 Pro'-ctArea I ° I v I I( ' >1 m I- a ( t I — so r I I co I I — — so . I I I I a 1 I - I D IV I_...-- -------..... ` ._._.._.` _� 40 z I I I I I 20 I I I I_ o I I 1 20 c, c+ 7 7 7 A n r v r A z �- N .n L w N � SOUTH R-MONUMENT LOCATION -j NORTH IV. VOLUME CHANGES A. Introduction The volumetric changes provided in this analysis are the differences in the quantity of sand at each profile line, given an effective distance. The area difference between two sets of survey data along each profile line is determined and then multiplied by the effective distance for each respective profile yielding the net volume change for each profile.. Volumetric changes were calculated between the landward limits of the profile and the approximate depth of closure at the seaward extent. In these calculations, the depth of closure was set at -11.8 feet NAVD88 to maintain consistency with the previous monitoring reports. Volumetric change values between the pre-construction in survey in February 2013 and the present survey in August 2014 are included in Table 3.Year-to-year comparisons of each monitoring year to the prior survey are included to see the annual change in the beach volume. The volume remaining from the nourishment event is determined by comparing the February 2013 pre-construction survey, to the post-construction survey in April 2014 and then the present one-year post construction survey from August 2014. The results are also reported in Table 3 and depicted in Figure 4. The surveys from February 2013, April 2013 and August 2014 are used as monitoring surveys in this analysis. The comparative profiles for FDEP R-monuments R-139 through G-5 and K-1 through K-2 are provided in Appendix A. ATKINS 9 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 14 of 20 B. Monitoring Areas i. North of Project Area (R-139 to R-146) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the last year, all profiles in the monitoring area north of the project area have accreted with a total volumetric gain of 94,026 cubic yards. All profiles gained significant material with the lowest gain being 6,991 cubic yards between R-143 and R-I44 and the largest gain from R-140 to R-141 with 23,174 cubic yards. The volumetric change data trends reflect the same trends as the shoreline change data within this monitoring area. The accretion of volume within this area is consistent with historic volumetric changes along this stretch of shoreline. This area is known to be an area where accretion naturally occurs. February 2013 to August 2014 Since the pre-construction survey in February 2013, all profiles within the northern monitoring area have gained more material after the fill placement. This reach has a total 89,610 cubic yards of volume remaining when compared to the pre-construction survey. All profiles gained significant material with the lowest gain being 7,476 cubic yards between R- 143 and R-144 and the largest gain from R-140 to R-141 with 22,521 cubic yards. This data also reflects the same accretional trends as the shoreline data. i. Project Area (R-146 to G-4) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the last year, the project area, from R-146 to G-4, remained very stable with losses only occurring between R-147 and R-148 (7,823 cubic yards). All other areas showed accretion. The net volumetric change for the project area for the past year shows a gain of 4,633 cubic yards of material. The volumetric changes for the project area range from 7,823 cubic yards of loss between R-143 and R-144 and 5,267 cubic yards of gain between R-146 and R-147. February 2013 to August 2014 Since the pre-construction survey in February 2013, the project area has 89,793 cubic yards of volume remaining. Note that this is 9% more material than what was measured in the post- construction survey. The beach profiles at the northern end and middle of the project area, from R-146 and G-2, have the highest volumes remaining with more than 74,000 cubic yards ; however they are not necessarily performing the best. While the volumes remaining between G-2 and G-3 are lower, those two profiles are showing the largest gains since the post-construction survey, with increases of approximately 58%. R-146 to R-147 has increased approximately 32%, while R-147 to R-148 has lost approximately 21%. Note that 10 CAC March 12.2015 VIII-4*New Business 15 of 20 the volumes for R-148 to G-1 are at or near zero. This is due to the survey lines of these two profiles falling almost exactly on top of each other. ii. South of Project Area/Groin and Breakwater Area (G-4 to G-5) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the last year, the monitoring area to the south of the project area from G-4 to G-5 has shown a slight gain of 2,360 cubic yards. This area is reflects the same trend as all other areas within the overall monitoring area. February 2013 to August 2014 Since the pre-construction survey in 2013, the southern monitoring area from G-4 to G-5 has 6,169 cubic yards of total volume remaining from the pre-construction to one-year post construction of the nourishment event. iii. Kice Island (K-2 to K-1) April 2013 to August 2014 Over the last year, Kice Island, including profiles K-1 and K-2, has shown a net gain of 32,187 cubic yards. The Kice Island profile comparisons for this monitoring report were taken to the depth of closure of-11.8 ft NAVD88, which is consistent with the other South Marco Island beach profile lines. The depth of closure was used as the end point for volume comparisons because material from the nearshore emergent bars has migrated onshore or very close to shore. February 2013 to August 2014 Since the pre-construction survey in February 2013, the total volume remaining for the Kice Island profiles, when taken out to the depth of closure, is 19,964 cubic yards. This is a 34,010 cubic yard gain since the post-construction survey in April 2013. ' 11 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 16 of 20 Table 2. 2014 Volumetric Changes and Volume Remaining(CY) Volume Remaining Volumetric (CY) Changes(CY) Range Monuments Feb.2013 to Feb. 2013 to April 2013 to April 2013 Aug. 2014 Aug.2014 R-139 to R-140 -238 17,199 17,278 R-140 to R-141 -653 22,521 23,174 R-141 to R-142 -2,679 13,652 16,276 R-142 to R-143 -3,530 8,168 11,615 R-143 to R-144 387 7,476 6,991 R-144 to R-145 1,383 9,703 8,437 R-145 to R-146 760 10,892 10,254 R-146 to R-147 16,279 21,602 5,267 R-147 to R-148 36,420 31,664 -7,823 R-148 to G-1 17 14 0 G-1 to G-2 19,158 21,095 1,936 G-2 to G-3 7,241 11,481 4,240 G-3 to G-4 2,939 _ _ _3,952 _ 1,013 G-4 to G-5 3,809 6,169 2,360 CAXAMBAS PASS K-2 to K-1 -14,046 19,964 32,187 TOTALS PER REACH NORTH OF FILL AREA -4,570 89,610 94,026 R-139 to R-146 PROJECT AREA 82,054 89,807 4,633 R-145 to G-4 SOUTH OF FILL/GROINS 3,809 6,169 2,360 G-4 to G-5 KICE ISLAND -14,046 19,964 32,187 K-1 to K-2 MONITORING AREA 67,247 205,550 133,206 R-139 to K-1 ATKINS 12 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 17 of 20 Figure 4.Volumetric Changes (CY) i I .....i: �br. ! toa l I 4br,� '1 I I Fpr_ f b'o co 44 = I 1 1Fbib of CC J ( i ! 1 5;f14 0 d°'iD -a - I #?I pi,t, I 414 of -C ; V u tbi. c RI ebrO c = 40 a j I 11 'rbr cc i 3 t--.0 O _ 1 olt''J j b• 3 1 1 D. ■ � I b-.9 • i !j I ssfrQSf9Wb. C. .j C. J 2, f-'r 'J '':". r. Q -ter fCli N 2 ty (A))2ululeweaewnioA ATKINS 13 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 18 of 20 V. PROJECT PERFORMANCE SUMMARY For the South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project, performance is defined by added beach width remaining. Figure 5 shows a schematic for how this method is measured. Added beach width (remaining), which was presented in Table 2 and Figure 3, is measured from the shoreline in the pre-construction survey. Figure 5. Beach Width Design Description 10 TOTAL BEACH WIDTH DESIGN ADDED BEACH WIDTH DESIGN t, CO L CO _ - EXAMPLE DESIGN TEMPLATE D PRE-CONSTRUCTION t N., \ PROFILE W _MHW U.. ' EkISTI'vG G'ROFILE �* I \ ADDED BEAt WIDTH REMAINING W tit TOTAL.BEACH WIDTH REMAINING - -10 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 DISTANCE FROM BASELINE (FEET) NOTE BASELINE SET AT SEAWALL,EDGE OF VEGETATION OR EQUIVALENT. Figure 6 shows a performance summary for each year of the 2013 South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project. On the left y-axis, the total average added beach width remaining within the project area, in feet referenced to the February 2013 pre-construction survey, is depicted. On the right y-axis, the total volume remaining within the project area in cubic yards, in reference to the February 2013 pre-construction survey, is shown. While volume changes for the project area within the active beach, from the dunes out to the approximate depth of closure of -11.8 feet NAVD88 (where offshore breakwaters do not exist), have shown a gain in material, the shoreline has retreated to almost half of it's post-construction width. Between April 2013 and August. 2014, there is a large recession, which can be expected in the first year after a nourishment project. �. 14 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4*New Business 19 of 20 Figure 6. South Marco Island Project Performance SOUTH MARCO ISLAND PROJECT PERFORMANCE 100 - 100.000 Aug-14 90- _..._._ ____.--_— ._ _._...__ ..___- „■1111_... _ __ 90,000 Ap 3 80 - 80.000 A• E 70 '------ --- 70.000 •� O g60 -- ------...---- 60.000 c 2 F, = 50 — — --- — --- 50,000 2 Aug-14 t4 40 40.000 a 30 - — 30.000 20 ----___- _..--- - 20.000 10 -- 10,000 Fe•13 0 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 SURVEY DATE Notes: tBeach Width 1.Baseline is February 2013 survey. .4111.∎Volume VI. CAXAMBAS PASS In August 2014 a hydrographic survey of the entirety of Caxambas Pass was performed and the resulting color-banded elevation map is given in Appendix B. A volumetric comparison was made between the August 2014 survey and the April 2013 post-construction survey. Based on a comparison of these two surveys, the analysis shows that the borrow area has accumulated a net volume of 49,703 cubic yards over the past year. Based upon the surveys provided by the Contractor 77,800 cubic yards of material was excavated from the Caxambas Pass borrow area (CEC, 2013). This indicates that approximately 64% of the material excavated for this project has filled in. The monitoring of the borrow area should be continued in the future to determine a rate of infill for future use. VII. SUMMARY The 2014 South Marco Island one year post-construction monitoring survey indicates that the beaches within the project and monitoring areas are accreting significantly after the 2013 nourishment event. In the past year, all three monitoring areas performed well showing overall volumetric gains. Relative to shoreline changes the area north of the project area showed significant shoreline advances. Within the project area from R-147 to G-1 significant shoreline retreat occurred. Volume calculations show that the total project area is 106% of its post- construction volume and the total monitoring area is 214% of its post-construction volume. ATKINS 15 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4`New Business 20 of 20 VIII. REFERENCES Atkins North America, Inc., South Marco Island 2010 Three Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report, 2011 Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. South Marco Island Beach Rcnourishment 2013 Post- Construction and Beach Monitoring Report, August 2013 Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Collier County Beach Renourishment Project Two Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report, June 2010 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), 2005. Joint Coastal Permit for South Marco Island Beach Restoration. Permit No. 0235209-001-JC. Humiston & Moore Engineers, 2008. South Marco Beach Renourishment Project First Monitoring Report. 16 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4"New Business 1 of 37 Appendix A Comparative Profiles Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N N — — I Cn Cn O o f O Cn O Cn O Cn 00 I I I I I I I 1 N.) Cat — O . • O — N ! Cn — O _ Vti . O — O V Ul — O • i 1 aO .. 1. N - • Cn • O /. LU Cn — I — (n D O • • O C O S O --.l O CU (.Q• O �I O W Vi N O co (V O , 7 (D O — a O N . N — 01 O , ) • N C n — 0 . 0 . N) v • — Cn . O • . C OO —-4 D O . n • v Z *CD o N S 01 —W 0 N C N N O 5' N CO C..) CD O0 O -eh Q) c), O . () . v — 00 4, N — Cn . O N N N O O O • CAt W •O I 1 I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I CA o CA o 01 o 01 00 I I I I I • o . • o • (n _ — o o • o . 01 o r N O - O • 1\> . . Ul _ O • • W I :• O - - 0 ° 1� co . r . v w I . U) • = cn — — o cC o 71 CD o = O : _ 'V v I o W N O O U. (D O 11 Q j Cn • , • o — O • 01 — O • O) . H O O 6) ()l O / < D x 0 0 • II / CD -+n 1 •10( s- • / • • co _, Cr C N . o_ 5' N W N O, . to CA OD • O - O • • 4 • 00 CO N _ O : O O O •• A co W o I I I I I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I N I I I N - - I 0101 O t11 O CJ7 O U1 O CJt o I I I I N Cn — O O — N O I� - — O rid O (t`. 11. O — O O 0 O O � O --.I CD co Ca o 1 O V> =11 No ov (D O - Cn N ; cn O - n Z (D n N � 3 CJ1 -CO O C N O �' N W Ca CJ1 sF CO Cn O O W OD N - O N N o o o co co O I 1 I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) • I I 1 cn o cn O cn o cn o I I I I I 0 O — to — — 0 o — o l/ • v, — o • N O — O N . O W . O O — _� rr 0 N O : C S O• 4' _ O N O .C7 C) o A Q) O — c) O a CJI U1 U'1 . / O — O O . O i r n m vi — C N U O cn O j' N cn CJ� W • O — O _ CO N _ cri ' O O O CO W 0o I I I I I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N N _1 I U1Cn O U1 O Cn O 01 O U1 O I I I I I I 1 N (n — O . 1 N O .•Cn , . O • O O — O . / : • O . • N . . — Cn . . O . : • . •0) 01 - 0 . . 0 0 CD p St D =,, K o - _ . . . . . . . . . • — CD C CQ 0 . •: 1 0 : 0 0 : : . . - _ c O • N) . . i . N 01 . • — O . . N . CA — O . 0 . N . v — Cn . O . . . • C 0 0 :• -L D 0 * n ) Z CD N U1 En 1 0 . : O C N N . O j' N ) Ca• N Ca cO — I -a-(n CP I. o . Ca) -I co N — Cn . O N N N . O O O .A G.) C.) O I I I I I I I I O O Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 1 -,cn o cn o cn o cn 0o I I I I I 1 cri _ 0 • c) . _ . ,. o . O — — o . : cn — o . N • O _ O • • • N .• • — O • • W • O — o 7)' 0 O , O O 3 . o L. c7 N p _ Z7o 1 O O _, N cn (. O O1 o . . • cn cn — I O O • • :.j ....:. d-) . o < . r• D . * C7 or ... . . _ m °' o C N CD N O j' N � ' (D O . I v V) cn 00 . • O - 0 . • O / : 00 N _ N N N O O O O A W W 00 I I I I I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N N) — -• I (}7 cn O U1 O (31 O U1 O U1 oo I I I I I I I I • N) U1 O . • • O N • : j o ( : co o . q : •cn it D O • U . CD 7-' r. D O I m ni = cn • (Q O I 1 O N N N O1 NO •', O (D O a O N . � . N - � l . • o . • • . N) . 01 . . O . O . N) v . . 0 . • o ° Z Q) (D -1 0 N cn OWN co . tR • O 5' N W W N O Ul-eF to U1 o . co .•co • . v OD N - O O O■ O — — — . p co co o I I I I I I O O Elevation (ft NAVD88) v, o cn O Ln o cn 0o I I I I I i v, 0 o L ■ v) o o 0 0 1,: N 0o I N cri 0 1: W o Si) co > i .=.1 . °o 70o 4 O N O -w cn — 7 ( O i o_ 0.1 . O _ O 1 01 I4f cri 0 OD o 0 rn 01 CD -< n D 0 * K o NOD N o O_ 7• N : � CO W -% 4 N 01 Du O - 0 CO 00 -P N _ N N N O O O O W W o I I I i I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I N N • — I cn U1 O U1 O 01 O Cn O C11 CD O I I I I I I I I Ni CJ1 — O O // — ` N) • 01 / — O . . . *- • J cn �/ . • 0 0 ,. — • e • • 01 — � . . O . O — O �` • • N) . — Cn , . O . U1 — — Cn = O O c 13 C D co o . :: 1 0 u O NO • • w 7 .Q •O . .•Ni . Ni . 01 — O . Ni . . o . . • . • . O .• Ni . .--.1 - . • O • • c,,) = 0 00 . . . . . — D O * n Z ) W . •. m Cl N) = Cn = N O 5' N co : . . . . W cP _ .-,}Cn 01 O O • 0) • cI co N — CS1 O N N N •. O O O -1 � 1 A co co O I I I I I I I O O Elevation (ft NAVD88) CA o cn o 01 o cn o I I I I I • 1 0 — 0 o _ • 0-1 _ 0 • o — O . • � / v1 • - o ( . 0 - O . • • n) • . • 01 _ O . co • . O — ❑ O . • cv 0.) • CD = U1 - - O n O -0 C 0 5' .A°14:O 'A _ O N 70 a O 4 co v l o • 0 1 o • • D o . —z v o : m / • : * D- W•/ iw N 01 .o O O' N / O CD W / J N c) i O1 • 0 - O • OD i CO N CJ1 ° O o O• A W W 00 I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N Ni — — I CJ1 01 O U1 O 01 O U1 O U1 O I I I I I I I 1 N 01 - O . O Ni . . . c.), . . / ' . • CT O )l. CJ▪7 O O O . • O N • O . v • . • : • 0.) c7-1 _ — 0 0 CD o5 - D o • _ v ca o 1 0 . N_ 8 c =I NO = (-1--) O Q' O Ni . Ni • CJ1 O . Ni CJt O . O • N 0▪1 0 0 : : . n • •• v • (D N * S 0 N W N N . • 94, N • .G1 • W N 0 -.F N CJ1 0 . . co 0 • • : O O O _s . A Ca (a •0 I I I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) v 0 o 1, o o 01 0 00 I I I I I I 01 0 CD cn — '- 0 . : o o N a� O . / N . C • ' 0 . : W . 0 - o (7) co / _ Cl) n• O. / - o c O p . m N co• © : 3:3 O � � v 0 Cn — a CD O : o O . cn o 1 • rn o 0 a> : • CT! -< D y • f C) O _ * v o m -, • V,.W N O / o j' N cp o 1 (.0 U1 CO . O - 0 O I O O o _.^ n W co o I I I I i 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I N I (}1 01 O U1 O Cn O 01 O C31 00 I I I I I I N 01 O O — cn 2 — O O , O O N � O O CAD C. O v CD co O �I O O p — (, O Q O N V1 O N v, O W < n O C7 Z (D � * � c N 0 j N W O n � ` cn O W 00 Cn O N N N O O CO O I I I I I I I O 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 1 v, o cii O 01 0 01 0 oo I I I I I 1 o - O • 0 _ • 01 - O . : 0 - O . : / o : • N ' O \ — O ` N 1 ol o co • O I. — co / :. . (Q O 71 O O A CTi v co : : o . • rn • o • —• co . rn . cri /. •: 1. D i . . • . * 0 o z � • •o / CD a vi W N O 0 =' N . -*, O /. co o - 1 - 0 CO 01 . . N _ O O O co co co o I I I i I co o Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I N Ni - - I 0101 O U1 O U1 O 01 O U1 °o I I I I I Ni 01 - O O - N 01 - O O• - • O v cn _ 0 O _ � 1 N O • CT C• 0 4 C D O D � o — CD ca o �i o No — c) O 0 N - UN 1 O Ni O O Ni O C) Z cD N U1 -W O 67 C Ni y O 5' N W W O� cri — N CS1 O W cn 00 N - O O O O W CO O I I I I I I I O O Elevation (ft NAVD88) cn 0 01 0 01 0 01 CD 0 I I I I I : : 01 . o — 0 • • . _ CP — o . • • • • • 0 :- 0 . : u1 — O • : 4 . N) • o • — N 01 . a - O . . , • • o I o • . . — o N . n o • I• -0 C z — 7) F I o o 4, a) 07, c O a o• — _ • 0 cn cn — 0 o i — o < - n - D V 4 0 o i . —z v o ma • m- CO C N O O j' N . -" CD O • . • W to . v N 01 0 0 CO . . CO N _ 0 o O O co co o I I I 1 I o O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I 1 I I I N N.) _. -‘ I _. Cn Cn 0 01 0 CA 0 Cn 0 C1i 00 I I I I I I I I N . 01 - O . O -• C31 s. I• O )o. V O N -• CJt . O . = O ,C (o O 0 • j v N O p • . , = - CD O Q••O N . , • . • N - O 01 . N i - O . O . N • 01 . CD . 0 . . -.� n O O . Z ) •C,,) . C) N 0 W N O . (A • . 0 �' N W `j O CD 0 U1 - rd-CA CPI• • CD . 00 • . .• --.I 00 -D. N - .O N N N O O O . - �-1. 1 W CO O I I I I I I I 0 CD Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 i cn o cn O cn O cn 0o I I 1 I 1 i cn 0 • • o _ • cn o . o • •: • c,7::: •:::: o . • cn — 0 • N O • — o . N . cn — O • • • W O — o . a) co 0) = U1 — O cr, O 'fir 3 O . _ O v O . 70 O co I v c — 7 . • . • D / • . • . * n O —Z v 3 co cn C N O N j • O O N W 0 •. • --J 0 CTl O — O . CO -N N O O O O -N W CO CO 0 I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I 1 N Ni -.. — I -, 0101 O U1 O Cn O U1 O U1 0o I I I I I I I 1 . Ni . 01 - O . O - • : • 1. N % . .• O .• CT - °o Al • r. • • : : o . O Ni 1 - O . • . co a-l . 0 O C CD o '5 D : : : �, � o — m � cc) o 1 0 0 � g 0 oN ; : ( ; — D C o : a 0 . . • Ni i . Ni U1 o . . Ni : : 01 - O . O . Ni . • ✓ - 01 . O . • C 0 : : :• •- 1. D 0 * C7• . v Z CD N _� o NO C N . 0 5' N 0 W • GJ (J1 N DTI O • • 0 . • W . v 00 4P N - 0 : :• O O O 1. 1� ^ /W 1 Y W o I I I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) i 1 I u, —0 0 01 o c 00 I I I I I cn I 0 • o • 01 • o . . . O - - . ' - O . . .. 01 — o • • O O r•..) 1 : 0 • . GO O o . • 7 C3i Id 0 O CD O = O =,, C - 7 CD 0_ .. . O O . o < n D • t ° o m v o u � yC N O O 5' N . CrJ N Cp . co - O . I : • oo al - . - . . N - co O O O CA Co o I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 1 1 I 1 N N.) _. _. I _, —. (n Ol co Ut O U1 co U1 co U1 co o I I I I I I I 1 . N (TI — O . co —• N • . U1 - O .• • U7 . co — O • : I? • • 1 N — . o cn . /IMF 1 . ✓ (Il — Y (f) 0 0 C Ti CD i g- >O v 1 - /N a) co �I UJ 0 —0 , m= O 0 N.) I • • N - o : • i : • 4 • N : • • co ul : : • • N v — 01 co . • o : • : — D o * C7 v Z w m Cl N m 10 1 o N y N • O 5' N W W OC C — --41-u) 01 O . W . • --,J 00 N - O N N N co o O . 4+ W W O I I I I I I I 0 O Elevation (ft NAVD88) cn o cn o cn o cn o° I I I I I i cn 0 o cn — 0 y o o a, _ 0 N • o O I N O c) O - O CD C • ' v c...)= (n O n 0 O O CD D : o'0 o • (-5- ca) 0 o�, cn m ° a O _ 0 is on 0 rn o O 0) o — < = 0 r D * n V * � CD _z v o m O O 3 N / O (D p J N Cn Cb O - I O • Cco 71 : • : co 4, N _ ° N N N O O O CO GJ o I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N N — — I _, —+ 0101 O U1 c) al O Cn O U1 O I I I I I I I 1 N 01 — O O — • N . C31 _ — O t : : Cn o U1 — opp o 0 _ O 1 1 • • N • — 01 . O • co Cn . 1 . • — (I) O O • 0 0 0 (D li St : O = Cn 1 n CO O i . • O O N 1n Iv O NO 1 . c ( 0 4 0 : Q . • . I. N ( . . N) — al .. O N 1. Cn — 0 1. . i N �. J — Cn . 0 » C7 O Za)) CD 1V CTI • _*T = W O : : .A N O 5. N• Ca) . . : . Ca N O—, Cn -e-cn Cr © • o . . • • • w . v CO A N O O O O � j • CO CO O I ( I I I I I f O O Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 i cn o cn o cn o cn C. I I I I I i • cn co o cn — 0 O — 0 cn - O N • . O _ O • • r.) • . • , . U] — O J w .: �: o —:.400•40 : o = cwn — . .- o o o c Co -0 s o_A cQ ° G) o 13 N cn O 4 N 0., CD O .- O — O Cri 01 • 4 rn O — O . / . 01 a) . ( .• O . i C 0 D * C) 0 1 —z v I. N co v N•. w cn N CA O . • 0 : 1 - 0 . • CO • / CO A N O O O O . w w o - I I I I I co Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N N _, -, I -' C)1 O1 O 01 O 01 O vi O U1 00 I I I I I I I I . N CTt - O . O . - N . Cn — • O : . : 40, • . O — O • . . l . V . . . I • • . . . O co CD • O O D aN — CD O _ CC o I' • G o -D w c O (v = 0 V. � - a CD o 0 . . . . . . 1 : O 1 . • Cr — o "t . 1 --4 r - CI1 . O C) o • n • • v Z CD N 01 —CO -. O C N N . . . . . O 5 N Ca 0 O — H ^d-Cn CS1 O --.I Co N - O O O O GJ CA) O I I I I I I I 0 O Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 1 -,U1 0 CI1 0 U1 0 cri oo I I I I I cin O O U1 - O O - O 01 - O N . O - O • N 01 - O 0,3 • i : 0 - N CO W cn n 01 — — O o O C (D • -0 5- > o 0 0 c 3 -r,• © m -,, w — Q m ° : • o o • n :: c cn — 0 • • o) o 0 o • • n D o my 011 N O O_ W t0/1 co . v CO O - - 0 O CO N ° O O O _. — W W 00 I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I 1 I I I N N _, - I 01 U1 O 01 O U1 O 01 O U1 o o I I I I I I I 1 . N . U1 - O . • O - N . O t (J7 O • O . • +� .• • O 1. . • . ,,1 . 0 0 . . • 0 • I . . o _, L . = c, i . - 0 n . CD ` . 1:1 5- D • o�o • . — CO ) a) o o o No : -• m cu °o , : a . . . N iI I . • • - O 1 : • �: N 01 - O S . . • O . 1. . N 01 . O . • . . C . _ 0 O -- n 0 . . Z N • (D N < - U1 —co O n) C N N O 5. N '. (D O CP - !" W-� U1 O . • O . • () . --4 00 N - O O O O • (J) W O I I I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I cn o 01 o cn 0 01 00 1 1 I 1 1 cn 0 o cn — 0 o 0 O N . O O • N : j� • of ` • • W . o . . = cn o D o co 0 : : G) o ( 0 Q • v, o o 0 : rn • o o . o) : : 0 1 < n\ . • J C 0 N Cu 0 C �W N N o o_ 5' N W cn CO v N O — — • O W CO N O O O .A W W O o I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N Ni - -• I -� 0101 O C.J, O V1 O (J1 O 01 00 I I I I I I I I N • cr • — O . • N . o-, • - :.:. 4/ • O . ! • . .• •O — 0 • : 1 : — O - J -••O . . . , Ni_. -. . , , .0 1 .• . . .. ,Sy Ul l� . • Id O 0 0: 01 (7) =1 O t. — Q •..-1- Ni Ni `. - Cn . O . Ni . � — O . O . Ni • co • . C o --, D O *C7 • Z v (D 1 N co coul WO y N • . . . O E. N W • W N OC• O . W . -.I op 4, N - V1 •O O O O -P W W O I I I I I I I O O Elevation (ft NAVD88) cn O cn o cn o cn o I I I I 1 cn 0 • • • o /! 0 !r . o 0 cn O • N . O • O • N . • O • : /7 • o o co z cn — O o O I C S D_ o � 0 0 — m• CO• ° 'G ) O . Thcn — m m ° a . cn . o — o . • cil : • cn — — o . : o) : O o • rn cn _< D• O o z m . •. * ,- y co .N © O 5• N (p O W U1 . -4 N U1 O ^ • 0 • CO . 00 •P N cn — ° • O O O . • 3 co co o I I I I co O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I N N) — —, I (n cri O U1 O U1 O Cn O U1 o N I I I I I I I N . C.n — — 0 . O . . . — N 1 . — ul 0 ' . O — O • • CT — O • : it • • • • N — O i . • cn_O. . • fl) U7 . { 0 CD Z O . O 0 C CD -D > . • . • . . . . O K 0 -.I . ' . • • — if E3"'' ca O .T 1 67 v. • NO i - O (D 0 0 O . . N) , . N ', — C31 0 N • U1 — O 1 • . O 6 N ►. • . . 0 . O . • C 00 . — D 0 * C7 » K . Z co CD C) N) 0 . . N W N• N . O 5' N Ca N O W , 0 . c) . 0 1 . N N N 0 0 0 W CO o I I I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) i i cn o cn o 01 0 cn 0o I I 1 I 1 • i c1 — 0 O — 01 — O • 0 : : : — O • 0.1 . — • . r N . •O — 0 . iv . . . 0 — O • \ :• W O —• O 0 • r ea co D cn : : — O 0 N O ' c 3 D ° K A = o — CD co • To 0 O can — F5 © a cn . • . . o I :• cn •I/ : cn - 0 0) o - 0 cn o = 0 D . . t C3 * � O -z v o : m � C N o cn . . . . O 5' N . . -^ N O . . W 0 . ! v N CO . O — O CO CO N _ N N N O O O O 0 0 W co 0 I I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I N N (n01 CD 01 O 01 O U1 O 01 o I I I I I I I N U1 — — O � . N . O 11 . a — v . 01 • - o • : ; • •• i o • _ o . 4• j : •0 • C O o Q <U t -0 5 D • • v O � • cn ( -• CO O • O a► ! N o .7 N O = CTI o • • — a •N . N ' • lir' _ N o �! N tf . ( — P — O O . N v — . o • . co = 0 o° : --1. D © * C) zv CD N _� o : :: �C N• O 5' N W W(D OO (n - •,+fA Cn• O . CO • ■J CO N - Cn . o N N N 0 0 0 ^ / s. � • Y W W •0 I I I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) u, 0 cn o cn o cn 00 I I I 1 I i cn o o \ • cn : : / — o • :• • • r o- o • cn o O O co • . = °o m o — c O 4 : r,..)1 0,--T�, (n n D O • Q • cn • . o - _ 0 cn cn — — 0 rn 0 — o . am :• 01 o = C) D• . -It 0 o � v • CW3i-y N O • o 5* N • W cn -' W v cn cn O -• O • • co 00 N _• o N N N • O O O . co co o I I I I I 0 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-4"New Business 36 of 37 Appendix B Caxambas Pass Borrow Area Survey Map I,, ,,,,..0.1.121,/esi WM. 201 1.-1000.9\hoped.,\C.I,X.-Survey-2W S. .IIIVI,UII•9 ..2III, > 1 (1) I M I a M I 1 GI) 1 ill yi r off fir ifr ji O 1 T 0 41' 0 §. 0 3 0 — • _ g 9: s' a) 4 I 0 Et, ,• 9, 41. 0 0 I. 91 CO ....• i:j CO 7...' .9 !- 22 tn, ••• •. I ••1 .4 irl) .....00' _ „...., . ... a) a) linilk o 1 al Ik 0 -I A i I i t' A) , i —A) C ' . 2 R E O . 2 ., N m m 0 73 '1* —i 0 _ o o ' ' I COLLIER COUNTY 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE ffT"1 f4,7:.'ti W741 7i.■ff ...........4. & A .A NAPLES,FL 34104 ,„„,....,...,.,,,,,,...,...,..,....“,, & g 1 X COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT ■:,'g g P?IP -ms gr— --" 'i I i -.,-,0„,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,.....=.- ... ORIGINAL I$SUED CIAlE i CO I o i 0 1 m I m I 0 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business ° CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering,28 Inc. 414:1 r 4, xtih 2481 NW Boca Raton Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33431 Tel: +1 561 391 8102 Fax: +1 561 391 9116 www.CBl.com March 10, 2015 Gary McAlpin, Director Collier County Coastal Zone Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Collier County 2015 Hardbottom Biological Monitoring (Contract No. 13-6164-CZ"Professional Services: Architect and Engineering") Dear Gary: This letter is a response to Collier County's request for a proposal for hourly services for CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CB&I) to perform nearshore hardbottom biological monitoring tasks under the above referenced contract. These services will be provided as required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Permit No. 0222355-001-JC for the 2013-14 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project. The monitoring protocol follows the FDEP-Approved Final Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (April 2013) that is incorporated into the permit under Permit Modification No. 0222355-012-JN, which requires completion of three annual post-construction nearshore hardbottom surveys in summer 2015, 2016 and 2017 and submittal of monitoring to FDEP following each annual survey. The scope of services and costs presented in this proposal include only those tasks associated with completion of the one-year post-construction survey in summer 2015, and preparation and submittal of the associated annual monitoring report. A detailed scope of work is attached as Exhibit A. A fee proposal is included as Exhibit B, the rate schedule is provided as Exhibit C, and the FDEP- Approved Collier County Final Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (April 2013) is provided as Exhibit D. The cost with time and materials is not to exceed $163,134.20. Tasks 1-3 $135,009.10 Contingent Task 4 $28,125.10 Total $163,134.20 All work will begin after receiving the Notice to Proceed from the County, and assuming no unforeseen delays, field work will be completed in summer (May — September) 2015, followed by preparation and submittal of the post-construction report within 90 days of the completion of the monitoring survey. Very truly yours, (--(,, Thomas P. Pierro, P.E., D.CE. Director CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. cc: Gail Hambright, Collier County Government Lauren Floyd, CB&I Tara Brenner, P.G., CB&I CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 2 of 28 "CIN' 7441, 01, Exhibit A Scope of Work CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 3 of 28 2015 Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Collier County, Florida Scope of Work Contract Number 13-6164-CZ Introduction The purpose of the Collier County Final Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (April 2013) is to determine potential nearshore hardbottom impacts resulting from placement of beach compatible sand on the 2013-14 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project shoreline (FDEP Permit Mod. No. 0222355-012-JN), as well as potential impacts from the Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging Project (FDEP Permit No. 0235740-001-JC) and/or the Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project (FDEP Permit No. 0142538-008- JC). The monitoring plan was developed in coordination with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and is a modified version of the monitoring plan which was required for the 2006 Collier County Beach Nourishment (FDEP Permit No. 0222355-001-JC). The FDEP-approved monitoring plan, provided as Exhibit D, includes monitoring of natural nearshore hardbottom communities to determine if hardbottom burial occurs beyond the predicted equilibrium toe of fill (ETOF); impacts within the ETOF were mitigated through construction of a 1.09 acre artificial reef as part of the 2006 beach nourishment project. As required by the monitoring plan, CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CB&I) and Collier County conducted a pre-construction nearshore hardbottom survey in August 2013 before construction of the 2013-14 Beach Nourishment Project. This proposal includes the tasks required to complete the one-year post-construction survey in summer 2015 and to prepare and submit the monitoring report to FDEP. 1. Administration This task includes administrative services associated with the 2015 monitoring survey, preparation and submittal of the annual report and coordination with FDEP. 2. Nearshore Hardbottom Survey The One-Year Post-Construction Survey will be conducted in summer 2015. This survey will follow the data collection methodology described in the FDEP-Approved Collier County Final Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (April 2013), provided as Exhibit D. The purpose of these surveys is to document any unanticipated project impacts to nearshore natural hardbottom beyond the ETOF. The survey will be completed jointly utilizing CB&I and Collier County divers, using a CB&I research vessel and captain. Cost estimates are based on a team of two (2) CB&I divers and two (2) County divers who will use County scuba tanks. However, if/when the County cannot provide a diver, CB&1 can provide an additional diver as needed (see contingency Task 4). The survey is estimated to take approximately 17 field days. If inclement weather delays/extends the survey, Task 4 also includes up to three (3) additional field days (see contingency Task 4). During the monitoring survey, divers will survey 31 transects adjacent to the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore and Naples Beach segments. The survey methodology will comply with the CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 4 of 28 FDEP-Approved Collier County Final Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (April 2013), provided as Exhibit D. Monitoring transects begin at the shoreward edge of the hardbottom and extend for 50 meters (164 ft) offshore (west). Divers will collect the following types of data along each transect: line-intercept, interval sediment depth, benthic characterization (BEAMR), coral census and photo quadrat monitoring, and video documentation. Divers will also delineate the nearshore hardbottom edge during each survey along each of the four (4) monitoring segments: Vanderbilt/Pelican Bay (R-21+080 to R-38+380), Park Shore (R-43+200 to R- 55+500) and Naples (R-58-300 to R-66). Divers follow the inshore edge of the community while towing a buoy equipped with a Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) antenna linked to a topside laptop computer running HYPACK navigational software. In compliance with FDEP permit requirements, monitoring progress will be reported weekly until the completion of each survey, at which point the JCP compliance officer will be notified that the survey is complete. 3. Report Preparation and Submittal Following the completion of the one-year post-construction survey, the data will be entered and compiled into the Collier County Access database where the data will be analyzed for comparison to the August 2013 pre-construction data for development of the one-year post- construction monitoring report. Raw data will be submitted to FDEP within 30 days of the completion of the survey, and the final report will be prepared and submitted to FDEP for review within 90 days of completion of the 2015 monitoring event. The Collier County Beach Nourishment Project One-Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report will compare 2015 data to pre-construction (August 2013) results. All video will be burned to DVDs and submitted with each FDEP monitoring report. 4. Additional CB&I Diver Support (contingent upon County directive) The hardbottom monitoring requires a team of four divers, which is planned to include two CB&I divers and 2 Collier County divers. In cases when Collier County divers are unable to participate in field work, CB&I divers will be available. This contingent task provides additional CB&I divers, as needed, so that the monitoring team will have four divers at all times. This task also includes up to three (3) additional field days for the CB&I crew in case inclement weather requires additional field days. This task will be a NTP item by the County. Summary This work will be performed on a time and materials (T&M) basis with a cost not to exceed $163,134.20, including the contingency task, as outlined in the attached spreadsheet provided in Exhibit B. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, all work will be completed within 180 days of receiving the Notice to Proceed from the County. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 5 of 28 tpi mvaw� Exhibit B Fee Proposal al coc, c4 e g ° I- 3 � _ _ ) / 6i , , , \5 �� ° a } / . ? _ o !{ƒ { ` ® ` ® & \ � { : (1\ 2 a ` ` " \ CC_� \) 2 e -6 \ ® e ti : 0 0 0 0 i 7a c.i E { Z e ; \ _ ! ) Zs } \ G \ \ / \ ) § ) { } } \ � , m E m T O U = _ u O O 0 O N — N — Ea fA 3 U) V) co o cN - u° E 5, o N O p� Y = o o N O r T j '> T O M N � In- v-. CO S=ZN E!) L a) as z N G ff) C C U = m E ` —a O o u) n UO a c v > 0". M p P� En W C m I- Y Z m�, CO_x CO O T N 7• Q) CJ N V O S m Z O m y O C4 W N m `% 1 T CO us U N oM a o O EA ,N- C v b T O Ea = N in o Ii- c0 O O fn m E» O rn o CO co _ O O a N m N- N ° °) m r O 9 CO O II U CO Z m O v O T W O N — ` r W o ° ce Z 2 Om in N N fn LL V V o W Q J O g m O _ m p p U o a of= O mO> t E _' o co x K r N cc o O W d Si J O O fH fil 0, IJ H O J u.O U Q IC CO W J E ~K =▪O 2 « O O co U a o co co co — co F U LOU) N rn y o o 0 V CO N y co W V V 4 r r 6 O) , W EA VI II 11 II U F5' N w O o x U E _ o N o Q P W v g F T, o 0 o m o ti o , o v) o m F- N in N N . P c Ts 0 • U E a o O c a In a 'c a ? us c I- m o I ti W a U o a c .� a t o E c a a a 0 0 a Q Q rq r, a CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 8 of 28 ��i �A•6 59 Exhibit C Rate Schedule CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 9 of 28 Exhibit C SCHEDULE B: RATE SCHEDULE Standard Hourly Title Rate Principal $ 206.00 Senior Project Manager $ 172.00 Project Manager $ 147.00 Senior Engineer $ 157.00 Engineer $ 123.00 Senior Inspector $ 96.00 Inspector $ 76.00 Senior Planner $ 139.00 Planner $ 110.00 Senior Designer $ 114.00 Designer $ 94.00 Environmental Specialist $ 109.00 Senior Environmental Specialist $ 134.00 Scientist/Geologist $ 93.00 Senior Scientist/Geologist $ 118.00 Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 110.00 Senior Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $ 139.00 GIS Specialist $ 102.00 Clerical/Administrative $ 62.00 Senior Technician $ 85.00 Technician $ 72.00 Surveyor and Mapper $ 120.00 CADD Technician $ 81.00 Survey Crew-2 man $ 130.00 Survey Crew-3 man $ 161.00 Survey Crew-4 man $ 189.00 Senior Architect $ 154.00 Architect $ 121.00 This list is not intended to be all inclusive. Hourly rates for other categories of professional, support and other services shall be mutually negotiated by Collier County and firm on a project by project basis as needed. B-1 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 10 of 28 y Exhibit D FDEP-Approved Collier County Final Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (April 2013) CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 11 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN COLLIER COUNTY BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT FDEP PERMIT NO. 0222355-001-JC DOCTORS PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING FDEP PERMIT NO. 0235740-001-JC WIGGINS PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FDEP PERMIT NO. 0142538-008-JC APRIL 2013 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 12 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose and Goals 1 1.2 Nearshore Hardbottom Resources 3 2.0 METHODS AND MATERIALS 8 2.1 Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Transects 8 2.1.1 Line-Intercept for Sediment Cover 10 2.1.2 Interval Sediment Depth Measurements 10 2.1.3 Benthic characterization: BEAMR 10 2.1.4 Scleractinian Coral Census and Photo Quadrat Monitoring 11 2.1.5 Video Documentation 12 2.1.6 In-situ Hardbottom Delineation 12 2.2 Wiggins Pass—Contingency Monitoring Plan 12 2.3 Pipeline Corridor Surveys 14 3.0 MONITORING SCHEDULE 14 4.0 REPORTING 14 4.1 Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Reports 14 4.2 Pipeline Corridor Observation Reports 15 5.0 REFERENCES 16 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Project Location Map 2 2 Vanderbilt Beach Segment 4 3 Pelican Bay Segment 5 4 Park Shore Segment 6 5 Naples Segment 7 6 Sample BEAMR data entry form 1 1 LIST OF TABLES Table No. 1 Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Transect Locations 9 2 Wiggins Pass Contingency Monitoring Transects 13 3 Collier County Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Schedule 14 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 13 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE AND GOALS The purpose of this monitoring plan is to determine potential nearshore hardbottom impacts resulting from placement of beach compatible sand on the 2013-14 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project shoreline, as well as potential impacts from Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging and/or the Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Projects. This monitoring plan has been developed in coordination with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and is a modified version of the monitoring plan which was required for the 2006 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project; some transects which were monitored for the 2006 project will continue to be monitored, some transects have been eliminated, some new transects have been added, and methods have been updated since the previous project. As compensation for potential effects from the 2006 project FDEP also required that Collier County construct a 1.09-acre artificial reef. This artificial reel was constructed in 2007, and based on two years of monitoring, FDEP determined the artificial reef as successful mitigation; therefore, no additional artificial reef monitoring is proposed in this monitoring plan. The 2013-14 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project is essentially a repeat of the 2006 project with minor modifications. Figure 1 shows the project limits for the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore and Naples Beach segments, which are the same project limits permitted for the 2006 project; however, gaps in fill are proposed within three segments. This project will place a maximum of approximately 430,000 cy of beach compatible fill along approximately 7.5 miles (39,600 ft) of Collier County shoreline, within four segments: Vanderbilt (R-22+300 to R- 30+500, with a gap from R-22+300 to R25+500), Pelican Bay (R-30+500 to R-37), Park Shore (R-43+500 to R-54+400, with a gap from R-47+500 to R-50) and Naples (R-58A-480 to R-79, with gaps from R-64+300 to R-68+400 and R-72+200 to R-79) (Figure 1). No new segments have been added. The project will be constructed with beach compatible fill from either an offshore borrow area or an upland sand source. If dredges are selected as the desired construction method, Borrow Area T1 will be utilized for its coarser sand which performed above expectations for the 2006 project. If the project is done by truck haul, an approved upland sand source will be utilized. The project is designed to avoid impacts to hardbottom. The purpose of this Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan is to identify and evaluate potential impacts to the natural nearshore hardbottom resources and hardbottom resources within pipeline corridors resulting from the combined Collier County Beach Nourishment Project (FDEP Permit No. 0222355-001-JC), Doctors Pass Inlet Maintenance Dredging Project (FDEP Permit No. 0235740-001-JC) and the Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project (FDEP Permit No. 0142538-008-JC). The 2005 Hardbottom Monitoring and Mitigation Plan included both the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project and Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging, which includes placement of dredged material south of the pass in approved disposal areas. 1 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 14 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL IIARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 BAREFOOT BEACH ''' 2.i 1 :. '.' 61'IGGI,NSPASS ' `� �`. 1 U I TALLAHASSEE �A.CKSOr7VILLE 1 u OELNOIZ•YrIGGIM1lS �`� `°1 r"'��s.. PRO STATE PARK vRR 0 PROJEION—� C�R_AVy: N. O(EAN I ■ HENDRY CO, , O BOCA LEE .....__..._... PATON V \ """I' ,7 VANDERBILT f __--- � MIAr;4I VANDERBILT I BEACH c'pn<( ° GULF I OF MEXCO 82t R'?0-``---- GULF PAONROE CO. [� �� wox cO w ,'' PELICAN PELICAN BAY `� BAY PARK ---\ Roo , \ SHORE \ j \ CLAM PASS i,nP� l SR 696 .\ i� 11 -� r=' PERMITTED 7 `, Nr800Ca PIPELINE ,e ', r CORRIDOR___, 151 1_, �/ �T\ _ =_ _------- __ -- -- _ , cs) PARK 1 � I I ,r I DGCTakS PASS1_ ,(, I SR 680 ,_...._._ __.._ �.j._ I 20' CGN1OUR r _ `{ > I NAPLES SR 88,3 i NAPLES L---t N F60000 1 \ ! I ` h f,V')LY; . . S ;� I x , 70 1:---,,,,,,...:,,,, sR 84 \T 1 f i 1, } _` LEGEND: �, j i ____- PERMITTED PIPELINE CORRIDOR (.................I PROJECT LIMITS "f`-' \. I PROPOSED FILL AREAS RHO r,. , ��a PELICAN BAY FILL AREA ) •PROPOSED NEARSHORE �� ,f'\ A��'\/J Ili. OPERATIONAL AREAS ll.,) I' PERMITTED OFFSHORE MEXICO `i.,I IA �� OPERATIONAL AREAS � RTSRT ROYAL 30 R70 FDEP MONUMENTS : NOTES: GORDON PASS {?; t80 \\ 1 1. COORDINATES ARE IN FEET N ° v. BASED ON FLORIDA STATE ' PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, " Qj�--'�0'J��61�0L'v L" EAST ZONE,NORTH AMERICAN x � " '� DATUM OF 1983INAD63). m fjj∎V ' 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT•2. FILL WIDTHS ARE NOT TO SOME. 1 C Figure 1. Project Location Map. 2 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 15 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 This Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan also includes monitoring associated with potential impacts from the Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project. which includes placement of fill on, or in the nearshore areas adjacent to, Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park and Barefoot Beach. This monitoring program has been designed to utilize quantitative and qualitative habitat assessments to determine potential direct and indirect effects from the three projects, including possible cross-shore sand transport beyond the estimated Equilibrium Toe of Fill (ETOF). A pre- construction survey will be conducted in summer 2013, and all post-construction surveys will be compared to the pre-construction survey in order to determine if project-related impacts from the 2013-14 project extend beyond the ETOF. The primary goal of this monitoring plan is to determine if there are any project-related impacts to natural hardbottom resources in excess of the 1.09 acres (ac) of impact area for which mitigation (in the form of artificial reef construction) was required as part of the 2006 project. !.2 N I. k R,N l l t)I R.I: II3IZDR() I I MI i FSOt IR'I'S Nearshore hardbottom habitat is present along the Collier County shoreline. Hardbottom resources have been identified through sidescan survey and diver verification on several occasions. In February 2003, a sidescan survey was conducted along the Collier County shoreline between R-17 and R-8l. The results of this survey documented approximately 500 acres (ac) of low relief nearshore hardbottom formations located within approximately 1,000 ft of the shoreline (CPE, 2004). In summer 2003, biologists conducted dive investigations on these resources to further document and characterize this habitat. Divers documented developed hardbottom communities, consisting of scleractinian coral species (Siderastrea spp., Solenastrea spp., Oculina sp. and Phyllangia sp.), gorgonian corals (Leptogorgia spp.), macroalgae (primarily Gracilaria spp., Caulerpa spp. and Hypnea spp.) sponges, tunicates and other benthic invertebrates and fish (CPE, 2004). The results of these investigations were used to assist Collier County and FDEP in the development of the hardbottom monitoring plan for the 2006 project. In compliance with the final FDEP-approved monitoring plan, biological monitoring surveys were completed in 2005 as a pre-construction assessment, and post-construction surveys were conducted in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (CPE 2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2009; Collier County, 2009). Figures 2-5 show the location of the nearshore hardbottom edge based on 2005 (pre- construction of the 2006 project) and 2009 (3-years post-construction) sidescan surveys. 3 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 185128 m ..• t ro U o u - }z4,441: 2012 PROPOSED DESIGN g tm,,,Z .,°:, x,1. �.'.;.. >2 Construction Template ' q f'•` '51'^"x.,, ,-•—Equilibrium Toe of Fill .'"e'.• *t-t., t,,5fS 2005 PERMITTED ETOF +800 R 19 , s+ ^'`.T' \ ' PIPELINE CORRIDOR x'L 'b ^+ —PERMITTED o ;,4. ` .7:„.,.:..,,,:' }'^'.may f ' 1,54 `;. '. PROPOSED R0I 0 :17'5`_t? ''o0L, HARDBOTTOM • "ice "zY° - —2009SIDESCAN SONAR HARDBOTTOM ° '',s TURKEY BAY $' •�.; 2005 SIDESCAN SONAR HARDBOTTOM :: ,T y T Biological Montoring Transacts-708000 R 2—' ;. /\/COLLIER COUNTY BEACH PROJECT /�/WIGGINS PASS PROJECT A. FDEP MONUMENTS y ( I COORDINATES fL 1.COORDINATES ARE N IN FEET BASED E THE rj FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE [1..,��,� V y�rL� SYSTEM,EAST ZONE,NORTH AMERICAN "' jT\ 9021+B0 ;;` DATUM OF A1RIA(PHD&3). 1'v'l .T$„'!'� : 2 DATE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY:JANUARY 2012. 3.THE PERMITTED ETOF IS BASED ON A Pr1_ f;' ..4 METHODOLOGYSUGGESTEDBYFDEPTO t. ' REPLACE THE ENGINEER S ETOF ANALYSIS —706000 g 4h (/; 1{f+o . 't 4� D • ` ` ,\ y } f 6 tf af '4.� •0; ' . ' -....-' . ....;;;,. ..., _Irk 4,.,,,. .... :.,1,..;,:771:11 f r•- 1,y, , , ,.... , . ..• J'e: F I ,,,,,' ` t'I ,� R< .�.., .v G-) r t i f . .-704000 GULF OF ef" 147 �fi C�A '"`x.1t tnA k: '4 t r^ a .' >v tL. 1.P, z'r 'MEXICO • rf r .wr 9f+III' Y r: -702000 ✓. if\R,, :,' a r. ', f ' ., I (• 1919 a. ! . 17..."••• ,•a ,1 7' • t~t }1 ��1 t r Yf^tni �f T.' a'i t.,,..,‘ I - 1Fdir s RO266��44��\ / 'IIG1 ` ..�.. Sgt, r !,. G%�1 IR•2• •n•. t ,' gall,. T.e r • 3.1..... VANDERBILT LAGOCK ,:', s t 1 iE w.- „' �' rf� it k.. R 27+8 _,.a'r.,•,,yr,' . I.A rf —700005 r 1 v �. .rat" c 1 .M• \a{wq.-}' ' R028+ 11y r• ,q e �r•.Au. i.�•j "� V'4ND�y8tFb ra}, �"� s . 1 •.i rR rr. •cO+enarcaeeROcEnOoew55e.O rC. �' y• A9NAW O0.0cP ONPANY 9029+ i 1 .., v1 ,R 30 �.'.,l:,:'*1 ruae,�.�,n.e 1 .1 j 1 1 COLLIER COUNTY BEACH____.. .•_,___,__._.. �. -.',�"' ;�,, ? RENOURISHMENT PROJECT s MATCHLINE-FIGURE 3 1 1 ' 1 f VANDERBILT BEACH 0 5oo 1,000 �1 e;„ :, SEGMENT rI Feet °a o0 1 931 '7p-a it mE o.. , a 1 inch e 1,000 feet m 1 Y,t,y �"v ah 6et T '� j L \ ;; ,a N♦s s+OwN FIGURE 2 4 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 17 of 28 u TE 1p ''.....7.E.,-"--` '=AR till g°a LEGEND: a d ' >. A 2012 PROPOSED DESIGN s. 't CONSTRUCTION TEMPLATE•J l&T-C UNF.-ae"URE.Z__—"_. ..1'a '' 'a 1 -•-EQUILIBRIUM TOE OF FILL it '111 `' r: (a4 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 18 0128 MATCHLINE-FIGURE 3 Tom., LEGEND: •o g - 2012 PROPOSED DESIGN ===CONSTRUCTION TEMPLATE R-43�.-° EQUILIBRIUM TOE OF FILL Q "'rt. ,� =2005 PERMITTED ETOF ' PIPELINE CORRIDOR R043.50 P�bTER CLAM RAY PERMITTED -•PROPOSED 684000 i HARDBOTTOM O IR-44 '' w-2009 SIDESCAN SONAR HARDBOTTOM 2005 SIDESCAN SONAR HARDBOTTOM 0 INNER CLAM BAY BIOLOGICAL MONITORING TRANSECTS I "'COLLIER COUNTY BEACH PROJECT I E. FDEP MONUMENTS j NOTES; J R 1.COORDINATES ARE IN FEET BASED ON THE '1 �f" FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE Sr --• .. SYSTEM,EAST ZONE,NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983(NAD 83). r "t' 2.DATE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY JANUARY 2012. '�) ' 1 ;A' 3.THE PERMITTED ETOF IS BASED ON A R I d 4 �.i METHODOLOGY SUGGESTED BY FDEP TO 682000 i Fl MI REPLACE THE ENGINEERS ETOF ANALYSIS. 1 F.R 46 k fit. -A Y 1!a .+/.�.' i''t ".�i! - RO '1 , ',s !„l_y, ep�. ,k',„,(` '4 mac. ( Z4 p r - • 3' (� II i r• ,; f-. ` ' r•, s . Irt Iw�•YMai —R047 00 :,� ' �`tE7� r; , t+ F680000 i "n fL ;fir R °K t ♦ Ailt S` A , I014 a 678000 )y t' .. 3 � ii. ` GULF OF rrr�� + `` �E Y, MEXICO -a y7 :;r , r, ,i;:i'i�0 $,�, R050c Y ""<* .. Z y.' qq M t {: 7∎ 'k` # it Rst'9_f 44)4.., * 1 ,..µ • iii k Kos R' • 1I11�1LL'A� 876000 R051'75 * '94 C . ' 4- I i +;r - l.k rt h ItV9k4/41 4.,404144M1 4i, Ilk A ' ' '1' R A C .; sa •∎',- 674000 ,' '1,0'1-4, �1 COgSigL LANNH06 EHOINEERIHO INC R19 58 t-,1,-7lE "1 nouc conranRo r 1 t j , J uman� a ` d -- t• MATCHLINE-FIGURE5 \\I♦ .,.. :,. . COLLIER COUNTY BEACH " �, RENOURISHMENT PROJECT ",,�»' r PARK SHO RE }:.n+ SEGMENT 0 500 1,000 0 Feet - R.55 II -took M. o� nay Cinch=1.000 feet ro Ja ° R14.sAEMEIMI 6 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 190128 w y� ( m �I(ROS3 • --- ;:_,,IdNERo ronsBAY r-'( to, LEGEND: § 2012 PROPOSED DESIGN 3, °o i. i . oA*'-•.y, . 'L'°CONSTRUCTION TEMPLATE MATCHLINE-FIGURE 4 d ( I. .M .- 7 EQUILIBRIUM TOE OF FILL —-. .-— • —4 ,• 20D5 PERMITTED ETOF .) r '., - x= - INLET DREDGE LIMITS a "R - ' PIPELINE CORRIDOR 5 Sik- r , ++: '..I I—PERMITTED I- ' / r ,—' ---PROPOSED y L 4 HARDBOTTOM R055 y� '.6 4 ♦ h.' -, .,r'-2009 SIDESCAN SONAR HARDBOTTOM•-672000 "f- $ -^^'-2005 SIDESCAN SONAR HARDBOTTOM ui• , BIOLOGICAL MONITORING TRANSECTS — - -: ^g/'COLLIER COUNTY BEACH PROJECT r' "y;.- '/ i. FDEP MONUMENTS - MOOR/NG BAY o :-.ice NOTES: Qr'r 1 COORDINATES ARE IN FEET BASED ON THE A...... .–- \ 4 FLORIDA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,EAST ZONE.NORTH AMERICAN -•. v'�,I }�� •� DATUM OF 7983(NAD 83). I�`Lo . ' 2.DATE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY JANUARY 2012. D .- -3.THE PERMITTED ETOF IS BASED ON A �j METHODOLOGY SUGGESTED BY FDEP TO ,'949 yr ',`4. REPLACE THE ENGINEER'S ETOF ANALYSIS. R,' '^•1 *y 4 HARDBOTTOM RESOURCES END NORTH OF �,Lj.1P ` *.,*A SOUTHERN NAPLES FILL SEGEMENT Atl'-670000 "^� j`). *_+T'� �, 7.4 s-'i. viti *At I,!t�a'" ' , 0 `O :..{ .I 9 R05w8.300 \ o� I v `R s i ! .,3 l ,4 � 01101, -668000 1 4'a r-'2 11(�, ,4,�,.�. ... +�'''' 4 .- ey 4. eago g............„3 R.59+59 \ A 44'..„*4' • �I **s• ! 9 ,*e GULF OF A. \I P j' -,4, k- r., , , r,Ig MEXICO • % ,r� r a f ,'I ��' "pa . /t1 .I r r.+� i. R TalfVr Ii7 ,00 `0 ` w 1.t. ' Y bi -"t a y , } i • !u i s ti„;1 ML 40, #t A. a A B 11'- I ..4' '''-s:4, -. c: .".:, st. "s.,,,,:wkk:17%. .4' {664000 ., - 1 1 0r4'7 , i"4 T i 9 C0.1,72 PLAMNT EEroln ENIMO,IMC. 7$$ `\ � ��.� � AAXAW OROUPC AMY ; R064-,10 s79.,1• o loo 500 1000 R00 •v COLLIER COUNTY BEACH • RENOURISHMENT PROJECT Feel NAPLES inch=954teet . +- ^r' }. SEGMENT g '' ,-.A a .. .0 r .. R-'f,OF °o 11,17 t °o, 1 1 '7 j 7 CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 20 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 2.0 METHODS AND MATERIALS This section has been developed to address the potential direct and/or indirect impacts to the nearshore hardbottom communities. The goal of this monitoring plan is to determine if there are any project-related impacts to natural hardbottom resources in excess of the 1.09 acres (ac) of impact area for which mitigation was required as part of the 2006 project. Methods and materials have been designed to meet this goal. 2.1 NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM MONITORING This monitoring plan is a modification of the 2005 FDEP-approved monitoring plan which was established for the 2006 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, modified to detect any potential impacts from the 2013-14 project. Table 1 lists the monitoring transects adjacent to each project fill segment and their locations. These transects will be monitored one time pre- construction, and annually for three years post-construction. Monitoring will be conducted on 31 transects, most of which were established prior to construction of the 2006 project adjacent to the Vanderbilt (Figure 2), Pelican Bay (Figure 3), Park Shore (Figure 4) and Naples Beach (Figure 5) segments. Based on FDEP guidance, control transects have been eliminated from the previous monitoring plan, and three (3) new transects have been added (one adjacent to Park Shore and two adjacent to Naples). There are no hardbottom resources adjacent to the southern fill area along the Naples shoreline; therefore, no monitoring transects were established in this area. Transects begin at the shoreward edge of the hardbottom and extend for 50 meters (164 ft) offshore (west). To ensure biological monitoring station permanence, stainless steel pins were installed at 5.0 m (16.4 ft) spacing along each of transects as part of the monitoring associated with the 2006 project. New pins will be installed if previously established pins cannot be located during the pre-construction survey in summer 2013, and three (3) new transects will be established and pins installed during the pre- construction survey. Based on a request by FDEP, divers will assess the hardbottom offshore of R-44+400 during the pre-construction survey, and if hardbottom is observed in this area then FDEP may require that an additional monitoring transect be established there. Nearshore hardbottom transect locations are provided in Table 1 and shown in Figures 2-5; the locations of the three (3) new transects will be established and recorded during the pre-construction survey. Monitoring reports will include coordinates of the start (east) and end (west) points of all monitoring transects and the depth at these points. During each survey, the current position and the relief(cm) of the nearshore hardbottom edge of each transect will be recorded. Methods for nearshore hardbottom monitoring surveys are described below in Sections 2.1.1 through 2.1.6. 8 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 21 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 Table 1.Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Transect Locations. Vanderbilt Beach Segment Transect Northing Easting R21+080 706783.37 384359.90 R23+285 704587.71 384403.83 R25+040 702775.26 384862.31 R26+460 701055.10 385391.61 R27+626 700324.00 385598.32 R28+550 699271.80 385727.81 R29+700 698135.90 385779.55 Pelican Bay Segment Transect Northing Easting R31+480 696337.35 386200.31 R33+760 694071.28 386561.77 R35+280 692556.49 386650.31 R36 691837.30 386855.09 R37+700 690091.91 387097.28 R38+380 689434.82 387139.69 Park Shore Segment Transect Northing Easting R43+550 684145.03 387686.95 R46* TBD TBD R46+725 680833.39 387956.79 R47+600 679992.9 388008.32 R49 678579.13 387979.67 R50+250 677242.48 388055.01 R51+275 675891.9 388264.41 R53+580 673669.53 388457.38 R55 672131.69 388380.97 Naples Beach Segment Transect Northing Easting R58-300 669304.71 388458.36 R58XX* TBD TBD R58+580 668095.73 389310.67 R58+860 667843.17 389328.06 R59 667729 389329.46 R59+590 667145.67 389295.03 R64-200* 1BD TBD R64+400 662218.58 390208.63 R65 661832.38 390194.09 *New transects,location to be determined(TBD) 9 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 22 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 2.1.1 Line-Intercept for Sediment Cover Line-intercept for sediment cover is an efficient method to assess sediment versus non-sediment cover and the location of each transition. These data provide greater spatial resolution than most methods and are readily employed along transects. This method will be used to monitor sediment coverage on the 31 transects (Figures 2-5, Table 1). During each survey, a biologist will swim the length of each transect and note the location along the transect tape, and linear extent, of each sand patch that is at least 0.5 m in length and uninterrupted by benthic biota. Two substrate designations will be considered: hardbottom and sand. Hardbottom is clearly exposed consolidated substrate with the potential for recruitment of benthic organisms and sand is defined as sediment with a depth of greater than 1 cm with no emerging biota. 2.1.2 Interval Sediment Depth Measurements Sediment depth data will be collected along each monitoring transect (Figures 2-5, Table 1) during each survey. During these surveys, divers will collect standing sediment depth measurements (to the nearest cm) at 1-m intervals along each monitoring transect. These data will be collected first during each survey, immediately after setting up the transect, to measure sediment depth in sediments undisturbed by divers. The vertical relief of the hardbottom edge and the sediment depth at its base will also be measured (cm) at the easternmost hardbottom- sand border adjacent to each 50-m transect and at each ledge (>l0 cm in vertical relief) encountered along each 50-m transect. Ledges along the transect will be noted during the pre- construction survey, with their location recorded and marked with a nail, and the height measured from the nail to the foot of the ledge. The change in distance from the nail to the Coot of the ledge will demonstrate if sediment is accumulating at the foot of the ledges due to cross- shore transport. 2.1.3 Benthic Characterization: BEAMR Benthic communities will be evaluated along each of the monitoring transects (Figures 2-5, Table 1) using the Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. Benthic Ecological Assessment for Marginal Reef (BEAMR) method (Lybolt and Baron, 2006). This method will be used to monitor benthic communities on the 25 transects (Figures 2-4, Table 1). Each BEAMR sample will be collected from a 0.5-m2 quadrat, sampled every 5.0 meters along the length of each transect, for a total of 11 quadrats (5.5 m2) per transect (a total sample area of 170.5 nm2 over 31 transects). The location of each permanent quadrat will be recorded on each quadrat datasheet. BEAMR datasheets have a standardized layout, and prompt biologists to enter data in all fields (Figure 6). BEAMR samples three core characteristics in each quadrat: physical, percent cover and coral density. Physical characteristics recorded include maximum relief (nearest cm) and maximum sediment depth (nearest cm, with a minimum depth of 1 cm). 10 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 23 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 Project Name Site Name I Transect Name Date Data Collector LIstindiv coral sp s over or Quad Label: (cm).MacmalgaeGenus Sample Name or# %,Cliona,d spg sp.°e CYano% (cm) Max Relief(cm) Max Sediment Depth(cm) Sessile Ben rhos... (Cover Sod i m enS irceal`.sand sM1eII rnud) Macroalgae- FleshyeCalcareous Orr-arg ee.cy anobactena Encrust ro Reo Algae Sponge Hydroid Octo coral Stony Coral Tk.mcate Hare Hard Substrate onaidepongepresent'r y or N ot..er Total Must=100% Standard Abbreviations mar oaloae Podia Genus=Gen u or Genoa Aura Brvonsls Brvothamnon Caul Cod Dasva Dasvcladus Grac Hari Horn Sr1(4 and abbreviation to rmats octocoral.Genuso f rash colony=Genu Gory Levi Plex...excmnt Pseudonter000rgja=Port Plexaurella=PIla PSeutloplexaura=PSpl §tone Coral Genus soameL of each colony sue Acer Hera C nat Mann Mcav Pame Odd Srad S sid Sbou Shva Sort Coral corrditron'.Wrwhitedisease(s)0=otherdiseasels 1 B=blearhma Coral Stress I n dex pd 1 2 3 Other-indudes Anemone uhormrock Annelidlcxdudinyworrnmrkl lrar 3 r�iyyjvv Broozo an Mrrr05235P�5ea4 rass Zoanthd Figure 6. Sample BEAMR data entry form Visual estimates of planar percent cover of all sessile benthos are pooled to 19 major functional groups. Functional groups are: sediment, macroalgae, turf algae, encrusting red algae, sponge, hydroid, octocoral, scleractinian coral, tunicate, bare hard substrate, seagrass, anemone, zoanthid, Millepora sp., sessile worm, wormrock (Phragmatopoma spp.), bivalve, bryozoan, and sessile arthropod. Each functional group is given a percent cover value (0-100%, minimum I% if present) and the total cover of all functional groups is 100%. Biologists augment data collection for sediment and turf algae by circling all descriptors that apply for sediment (sand, shell-hash. mud). Presence of any clionaid sponges (e.g., Pione lanipa, Cliona delitrix, Cliona celata) is also noted. The macroalgae percent cover data are augmented by a genus-level breakdown of macroalgae percent cover (for all genera with at least 1% cover). As with all non-consumptive surveys, BEAMR is necessarily constrained to visually conspicuous organisms with well-defined identifying characteristics. Each colony of octocoral and scleractinian coral is identified and the maximum height or width is measured to the nearest centimeter. Octocoral individuals are identified to genus. Scleractinian coral individuals are identified to species whenever possible. The smallest size recorded is one centimeter for individuals less than or equal to one centimeter. Photographs will be taken to supplement BEAMR data along each transect. 2.1.4 Seleractinian Coral Census and Photo Quadrat Monitoring In addition to collecting sediment and BEAMR data along all transects (Figures 2-5, Table 1), a biologist will conduct a census of all scleractinian coral colonies > 5 cm located within a 1-m wide belt (0.5 m to the north and 0.5 m to the south) along each 50-m transect. During these belt- 11 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 24 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 transect surveys, species, size and the location on the transect of each qualifying scleractinian coral will be recorded. In order to quantify colony condition (i.e. stress), a subset of corals > 15 cm (large) will be monitored through all surveys using a photo quadrat. Two (2) large corals will be located along each of the 31 transects (for a total of 64 colonies) during the pre-construction survey, and their location recorded and marked with a nail. If no corals > 15 cm are observed within a 1-m wide belt along the transect, divers may look outside the belt for large corals to monitor along the transect. Photographs will be taken using a camera in underwater housing mounted on a 0.25-m2 framer. Use of a framer will provide calibrated photo-documentation at a set distance from the substrate during each sampling event. Each photograph will be analyzed using the analytical software Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe) to calculate planar area of live tissue on each large coral colony (Kohler and Gill, 2006). The time-series photographs will provide a clear visual representation of any changes in the condition of each colony (e.g., disease, sedimentation, change in color) and the CPCe calculations will quantify any changes in live tissue (growth or die-off) taking place over time. 2.1.5 Video Documentation Video will be collected along all monitoring transects (Figures 2-5, Table I) using a video camera in an underwater housing. Divers will collect video by swimming from the inshore hardbottom edge west to the end of each 50-m transect, maintaining a height of approximately 40 cm above the substrate and a rate of approximately 5 m per minute. Video will supplement the sediment, BEAMR and coral census data to help assess any potential project-related impacts. Transect video is intended as a qualitative aid in transect comparison among surveys; quantitative video analysis is not included in this monitoring plan, but video may be analyzed at a later date if desired. 2.1.6 In-situ Hardbottom Delineation In order to document changes in hardbottom exposure, divers will delineate the nearshore hardbottom edge along each of the four (4) monitoring segments: Vanderbilt (R-21+080 to R- 29+700), Pelican Bay (R-30+500 to R-37), Park Shore (R-43+550 to R-55) and Naples (R-58- 300 to R-65). Hardbottom edge delineation will be conducted along each segment during each survey. Divers will follow the inshore edge of the community while towing a buoy equipped with a Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) antenna linked to a topside laptop computer running HYPACK navigational software. The positioning data will be recorded, and results of each hardbottom investigation will be compared to the pre-construction hardbottom mapping survey to show changes in hardbottom exposure over time. 2.2 WIGGINS PASS— CONTINGENCY MONITORING PLAN One component of the Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project (FDEP Permit No. 0142538-008-JC) involves placement of suitable fill removed from Wiggins Pass on the shoreline of, or in the nearshore environment adjacent to, Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park (R-18 to R-20) south of the Pass, and Barefoot Beach (R-12 to R-15+500), north of the Pass. Based on coordination with FDEP, it was determined that the three (3) control 12 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 25 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 monitoring transects between R-18 and R-20, which were established and monitored in association with the 2006 project (Figure 2, Table 2), can be monitored as part of the Collier County Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan to determine potential impacts from fill placement if nearshore or onshore fill placement will be conducted along the Delnor-Wiggins shoreline. If fill is placed south of the pass on or in the nearshore area adjacent to Delnor- Wiggins Pass State Park, three (3) transects will be monitored (Figure 2, Table 2). Table 2.Wiggins Pass Contingency Monitoring Transect Locations. Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park Transect Northing Easting R18+900 709037.27 383572.79 R19+400 708484.17 383699.82 R20 707864.78 383498.82 Based on previous hardbottom investigations north of Wiggins Pass, the County modified the Barefoot Beach fill placement area in order to avoid hardbottom impacts. Sidescan sonar and diver groundtruthing surveys conducted in 1993 and 1994 documented hardbottom resources located approximately 5600 ft north of Wiggins Pass, approximately 700 ft offshore of R-11 (CPE, 1994). Collier County divers conducted an investigation of this area in 2010 which confirmed the presence of hardbottom between R-10 and R-11, but did not find hardbottom south of R-1 1. Based on these sidescan sonar and diver investigations, Collier County and FDEP determined that limited placement of fill on or adjacent to Barefoot Beach to the area south of R- 12 would avoid impacts to the hardbottom located between R-10 and R-11. Therefore, placement of fill on or in the nearshore area adjacent to Barefoot Beach south of R-12 would not require any hardbottom monitoring. A recent September 2012 CPE sidescan sonar survey north of Wiggins Pass showed additional potential hardbottom located between R-12 and R-13; however diver investigations in February 2013 did not locate hardbottom resources in this area. Divers observed large areas of mud deposit with occasional small patches of emergent rock and/or octocorals. Based on these investigations, FDEP determined that there is no hardbottom which may be impacted by placement of fill on or in the nearshore environment of Barefoot Beach as part of the Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project. 13 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 26 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL HARDI3OTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 2.3 PIPELINE CORRIDOR SURVEYS Pipeline corridors shall be video surveyed immediately after pipeline placement and immediately after removal of each pipeline. The pipeline corridor transect locations will be marked with buoys by the selected dredge contractor immediately prior to pipeline placement. Divers will swim the length of the pipeline transects collecting video with a camera in an underwater housing. Any observed damage to hardbottom resources will be documented with video and still photography, the location of the damage will be recorded and damage assessments will he provided to FDEP. In the event that remediation and/or mitigation efforts are required, Collier County will coordinate program details with FDEP. 3.0 MONITORING SCHEDULE Monitoring for the 2013-14 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project will follow the schedule presented in Table 3. All nearshore hardbottom monitoring surveys will be conducted in summer months (June through September). Pipeline corridor surveys will be conducted during construction of the project to assess any impacts caused by the placement of pipeline over hardbottom resources. Table 3. Collier County hardbottom Biological Monitoring Schedule Nearshore Hardbottom Survey Monitoringr Pipeline Corridors Pre-Construction 2013 Mid-Construction 2013-14 1-Year Post-Construction 2015 2-Year Post-Construction 2016 3-Year Post-Construction 2017 Nearshore hardbottom surveys include transect monitoring and hardbottom edge delineation Pipeline corridors will be video surveyed immediately following placement and removal of pipelines 4.0 REPORTING 4.1 NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM MONITORING REPORTS FDEP will be informed when each survey will begin; monitoring progress shall be reported weekly until the completion of each survey, at which point the JCP compliance officer shall be notified that the survey is complete. Raw data, including copies of data sheets and shapefiles of the hardbottom edge, will be submitted to FDEP within 30 days of the completion of each survey. A first annual, second annual and third annual post-construction nearshore hardbottom monitoring report will be prepared and submitted to the FDEP for review within 90 days of the completion of each monitoring event, but no later than December 1st, for three years post- construction. The post-construction reports will compare data to pre-construction results and to 14 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 27 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL 1-IARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 each previous post-construction report. A final report will be prepared following the conclusion of the third year of post-construction monitoring and will summarize and compare data of all reports. Reports will analyze and discuss any observed burial, sedimentation, or changes to benthic communities. Data will be analyzed to determine any potential direct and secondary impacts due to the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project. Videos collected along monitoring transects will be submitted on DVDs with each annual report. Each annual report will also include the results of the hardbottom delineation and a comparison of the location of the inshore hardbottom edge delineated during each survey. Annual monitoring reports will include: • A map including the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project area and adjacent hardbottom resources and monitoring transects overlaid onto recent, clear aerial photographs; • Analysis of line-intercept data and interval sediment depth measurements, illustrated with linear and bar graphs demonstrating sediment dynamics on the transects ; • Multivariate analysis of quantitative BEAMR data with subsequent analysis of benthic biological components on the monitoring transects (e.g., percent cover by scleractinian corals, octocorals, sponges, and algae); • Comparison of coral density based on coral census data; • Comparison of large (> 15 cm) coral condition based on photo quadrat analyses; • A comparison of post-construction monitoring results to pre-construction monitoring results; • A figure comparing the most recent annual hardbottom edge delineation and all previous hardbottom delineations; • Copies of all transect video submitted on DVDs; • A comprehensive Collier County Environmental GIS Database will be updated after each monitoring event. 4.2 PIPELINE CORRIDOR OBSERVATION REPORTS Observation reports documenting pipeline surveys will be submitted within 60 days following removal of each pipeline. Reports will include observations following placement and removal of each pipeline, and a DVD will be provided with a copy of all video surveys. In cases where damage to hardbottom resources is observed, FDEP will be notified and remediation efforts, if required, will be coordinated. 15 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC. CAC March 12,2015 VIII-5 New Business 28 of 28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL IIARDBOTTOM BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN APRIL 2013 5.0 REFERENCES Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CPE). 1994. Collier County Hardbottom Mapping and Characterization Report. Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CPE). 2004. North Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, 2003 Marine Resource Investigation Report. January 2004. Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CPE). 2006. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, FDEP Permit No. 0222355-001-JC, 2005 Pre-Construction Environmental Monitoring Report. January 2006. Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CPE). 2007a. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, FDEP Permit No. 0222355-001-JC, 2006 Immediate Post-Construction Environmental Monitoring Report. January 2007. Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CPE). 2007b. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, FDEP Permit No. 0222355-001-JC, 2007 Year One Post-Construction Environmental Monitoring Report. November 2007. Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CPE). 2009. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, FDEP Permit No. 0222355-001-JC, Two Year (2008) Post-Construction Environmental Monitoring Report. February 2009. Collier County, Coastal Zone Management Department. 2009. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, FDEP Permit No. 0222355-001-JC, Three Year (2009) Post- Construction Biological Monitoring Report. November 2009. Kohler, K.E. and S.M. Gill. 2006. Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe): a visual basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Computers and Geosciences, 32(9):1259-1269. Lybolt, M. and R. Baron. 2006. BEAMR (Benthic Ecological Assessment for Marginal Reels): a preferred replacement for AGRRA and similar benthic assessment methods tailored for marginal reefs. Proceedings from the 2006ISRS European Meeting. Bremen, Germany. 16 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING, INC.