The URL can be used to link to this page

CAC Agenda 02/23/2015CAC MEETING AGENA FEBRUARY 23.2015 COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS THIRD FLOOR, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2015 - 1:00 P.M. I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda V. Public Comments VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. October 23, 2014 VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report VIII. New Business 1. Approval 2015 Beach /Inlet Monitoring - Humiston & Moore * Proposal 2. Approval WP Intermediate Dredge RFP Package * Wiggins Pass Straightening Implementation ** Draft Wiggins Pass Technical Specifications * ** Bid Schedule & Questionnaire * * ** Wiggins Pass Plans 3. WP Peer Draft Report Review 4. FEMA PW 2700 Second Appeal Supplemental Review * Backup Material 5. Capri Pass Draft Study - Update 6. FY 15 CAC Grant Applications 7. Doctors Pass 2015 Monitoring Report * Doctors Pass 2014 1 -Year Post Construction Engineering Monitoring Report ** 2014 Bathymetric Monitoring Survey IX. Old Business 1. LGFR Update and FDEP Project Ranking * Beach Management Funding Assistance Program 2. 15 Year Permit Application Status 3. 2015 Beach Renourishment Plan 4. Central Marco Beach Regrade Environmental Concerns and Status X. Announcements 2015 CAC Scheduled Meetings XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date /Location March 12, 2015 Government Center, 3rd Floor XIII. Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gail D. Hambright at 252 -2966. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252 -8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99 -22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. CAC February 12, 2015 VI -1 Approve Minutes 1 of 7 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, October 23, 2014 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3`d Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: Jim Burke (Excused) Robert Raymond John Sorey, III Joseph A. Moreland Nick Penniman Debbie Roddy Robert Brown Ian Butler Steve Koziar ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney Gail Hambright, Accountant CAC February 12, 2015 VI -1 Approve Minutes 2 of 7 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online. Call to Order Vice Chairman Raymond called the meeting to order at 1:00PM II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Sorey moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following additions: • Item VIIIA —Feasibility Study— Collier Creek History, Analysis and Funding Apportionment • Item VIII.5 -South Marco Beach Quantity Analysis Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 7 — 0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. September 11, 2014 Ms. Roddy moved to approve the minutes of the September 11, 2014 as submitted. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 6 — 0. Mr. Koziar abstained as he was not present at the previous meeting. VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report The Committee reviewed the "Collier County Tourist Tax Revenue FY 14 TDC Revenue Report" dated through September 30, 2014. 2. Permit Extension Mr. McAlpin provided a copy of a letter from Ivana Kenny, Environmental Specialist 11, Florida Department of Environmental Protection dated October 13, 2014 approving an extension of time for permit #0222355- 001 -JC until January 12, 2017 for information purposes. He noted the US Army Corps of Engineers permit is valid until November of 2015. Mr. Moreland arrived at 1:12pm 3. Sand Lease Mr. McAlpin proved a copy of the "Lease Between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management of the Department of the Interior and Collier County Florida Regarding the Use of Outer Continental Shelf Sand Resources for Shore Protection and Restoration in Collier Count Florida" for information purposes. He noted: CAC February 12, 2015 VIA Approve Minutes 3of7 The lease allows the County to utilize off shore sources for acquiring sand for beach renourishment projects. There is no cost for the sand itself, however the County is responsible for the other items such as environmental studies, etc. Any pipelines utilized in transporting the sand will be elevated 30 inches off the bottom of the ocean to ensure there is no damage to the hard bottom and coral reefs. 4. Sand Gift - Marco Island Marriott Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve the gift of between 10, 000 -15, 000 CY's of beach quality sand from the Marco Island Marriott to be used in the Marco Island Central Beach re -grade project scheduled after November 1, 2015 " for information purposes. He noted the County intends to work with the Hideaway Beach Tax District to utilize sand dredged from the Big Marco River for project as well. Mr. Sorey moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the gift between 10,000 - 15,000 CY's of beach quality sand from the Marco Island Marriott to be used in the Marco Island Central Beach re grade project scheduled after November 1, 2015. " Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 5. Second Appeal - Beach Restoration Deobligation Mr. McAlpin provide a copy of a letter to Brad Keiserman Department of Homeland Security from himself and Ernest B. Abbott, Of Counsel Marlena P. Pickering, Associate Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC - Special Counsel to Collier County, Florida — Subject 2nd Appeal, Collier County Florida dated October 17, 2014 for information purposes. He noted: • The request is for FEMA to reverse their decision to deobligate approximate $1 OM worth of funds for reimbursement to the County for repairs due to damage caused by Hurricane Wilma. • The appeal incorporates technical data including and independent peer review of the issue by Atkins. • FEMA has 90 days to respond to the appeal and support of area Congressional delegates has been included in the request. The Committee recommended the Congressional Delegates be notified on the status of the appeal and request they monitor the "time clock" allotted to FEMA to respond. VIII. New Business 1. Naples Beach Renourishment Sand Supply & Hauling Contract No. 14 -634 *Bid Tab * *Agreement Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Contract No. 14 -6343 — Tropical Storm (TS) Debbie Naples Beach Renourishment (Sand Supply and Delivery) to supply and deliver approximately 78,678 tons of beach quality sand as authorized by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) P 0679 - Naples Beach Renourishment project to Phillips and Jordan, Inc. for $1,823,635.56 (Project 195- 90038), authorize staff to withhold Notice -to- Proceed issuance until the FEMA P CAC February 12, 2015 VI -1 Approve Minutes 4of7 revision has been issued, authorize all required budget amendments, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism " dated October 23, 2014 for consideration. He noted: • The scope of work is for the supply and delivery of beach quality sand to 3 beach points on the Naples beach. • The work is expected to begin around November 10, 2014 and be completed just before the Christmas holiday. There will be no work during Thanksgiving. • A truck route has been established which addresses previous concerns raised by Lee County officials during similar projects. • Approximately 4,500 truck loads are to be hauled to the beach. • The County conducts annually field surveys on the profiles of the beach which assists in determining where sand needs to be placed in order to maintain adequate width of beaches. The Committee recommended the Executive Summary identify the quantities of sand associated with the work in both cubic yards and tonnage Mr. Brown moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Contract No. 14 -6343 — Tropical Storm (TS) Debbie Naples Beach Renourishment (Sand Supply and Delivery) to supply and deliver approximately 78,678 tons of beach quality sand as authorized by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) PW 0679 - Naples Beach Renourishment project to Phillips and Jordan, Inc. for $1,823,635.56 (Project 195- 90038), authorize staff to withhold Notice -to- Proceed issuance until the FEMA PW revision has been issued, authorize all required budget amendments, and hereby finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Sorey. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 2. Naples Beach Renourishment Sand Placement - Contract No. 14 -6352 * Bid Tab ** Agreement Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to award Invitation to Bid (ITB) 14 -6352 - Naples Beach Renourishment (Sand Placement) to Earth Tech Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $748, 861.20 to place, grade and transport approximately 78,678 tons of beach quality sand as authorized by the Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA) PW 0679 - Naples Beach Renourishment to repair damages as a result of Tropical Storm Debby (Project 195- 90038), authorize staff to withhold Notice -to- Proceed (NTP) issuance until the FEMA PW revision has been issued, authorize all required budget amendments, authorize the Chairman to execute the corresponding agreement, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism dated October 23, 2014 for consideration. He noted the item is a companion item to the previous item and is for disbursement of sand on the beaches once it has been delivered by the truck haulers. Mr. Sorey moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners award Invitation to Bid (ITB) 14 -6352 - Naples Beach Renourishment (Sand Placement) to Earth Tech Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $748,861.20 to place, grade and transport approximately 78,678 tons of beach quality sand as authorized by the Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA) PW 0679 - Naples Beach Renourishment to repair damages as a result of Tropical Storm Debby (Project 195- 90038), authorize staff to withhold Notice -to- Proceed (NTP) issuance until the FEMA PW revision has been issued, authorize al all required budget amendments, authorize CAC February 12, 2015 VI -1 Approve Minutes 5 of 7 the Chairman to execute the corresponding agreement and hereby finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Moreland. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 3. Naples Beach Renourishment Construction Engineering Inspection - Atkins * Proposal Mr. McAlpin provide the "Naples Beach Nourishment Project Post - Design Services For the Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department Change Order No. 2 to Work Order 45- 151465 Contract Number 14 -6256 Collier County Project Number 195 -90038 October 20, 2014 " for consideration. Mr. Moreland moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the Naples Beach Nourishment Project Post - Design Services For the Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department Change Order No. 2 to Work Order 45- 151465 Contract Number 14 -6256 Collier County Project Number 195 -90038 October 20, 2014" and hereby finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 4. Feasibility Study — Collier Creek History, Analysis and Funding Apportionment Mr. McAlpin presented "Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering "for Collier County, Collier Creek Feasibility dated October 22, 2014 in the amount of $59,807.44 for consideration. He noted: • The scope of work is to assist in determining the reasons sand is accreting in the mouth of Collier Creek. • The area has been subject to the accretion since the collapse of Sand Dollar Island and has become a safety hazard for boaters. • The activities include field work, modeling, preliminary design and a determination on the feasibility of obtaining any permits for the measures necessary to rectify the issue. Speaker Ben Farnsworth, President, Ville de Marco West, addressed the Committee endorsing the proposal as the area is a safety hazard to boaters. The Marco Island Waterway Advisory Committee has also voted unanimously to endorse the proposal. Mr. Brown moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering "for Collier County, Collier Creek Feasibility as outlined by Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. in their proposal dated October 22, 2014 in the amount of $59,807.44 and hereby finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Ms. Roddy. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. 5. South Marco Beach Quantity Analysis Mr. McAlpin presented "Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering "for Collier County Marco Island Design, Permitting, Construction Plans & Specifications " for consideration. He noted the scope of work includes the design, permitting, preparation of construction plans and specifications and assistance with the bidding process for the work necessary to repair damage to the area from Tropical Storm Debbie. Current estimates indicate 15,OOOcy of sand will need to be placed on the beach. CAC February 12, 2015 VI -1 Approve Minutes 6of7 Ms. Roddy moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering "for Collier County Marco Island Design, Permitting, Construction Plans & Specifications as outlined by Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. in their proposal dated October 22, 2014 in the amount of $59,807.44 and hereby finds the item promotes tourism. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. IX. Old Business None X. Announcements None XI. Committee Member Discussion Mr. Penniman requested assurance that any pipelines placed in association with sand placement on the Naples Beach will be undertaken in a manner to not damage any coral reefs in the area of work. Mr. McAlpin reported care will be taken and the work will be subject to permit conditions. Mr. Penniman expressed concern on the status on the shoaling at Clam Pass and the measures being taken to address the issue. Mr. McAlpin reported the area is the responsibility of the Pelican Bay Services Division, not Coastal Zone Management. Mr. Sorey noted, though the area is not the responsibility of Coastal Zone Management, the work is completed with Tourist Development Tax funds and expressed concern the current activities may not be promoting efficient use of those monies. Mr. Moreland requested an update on replacement of damaged navigation markers at Wiggins Pass. Mr. McAlpin reported temporary buoys are in place and the original markers have been subject to damaged pylons. The County is not equipped to complete the work and given the small scope of the project, it has been difficult to find a contractor willing to complete the work. XII. Next Meeting Date/Location November 13, 2014 — Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 1:58 P.M. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee Jim Burke, Chairman CAC February 12, 2015 VI -1 Approve Minutes 7 of 7 These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended CAC February 12, 2015 VII -1 Revenue Report 1 of 18 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX REVENUE FY 15 TDC Revenue Report 31- Jan -2015 Description Fund FY 15 Adopted FY 15 Current Budget Forecast FY 15 YTD Forecast FY 15 YTD Actual Var to FY 15 YTD Forecast Beach Facilities 183 184 193 194 195 196 198 Gross Budget 763,100 877,560 191,327 216,395 25,068 TDC Promotion 5,984,200, 6,881,867 1,500,399: 1,696 979 196,581 Non - County Museums 406,100 467,013 101,819'' 115,159 13,340 TDC Admin 1,980,700' 2,277,813 496,614 561,679 65,066 Beach Renoudshment 6,276,600 7218,108 1,573,707 1,779,892 206,185 Disaster Recovery County Museums 1,637,900 1,883,539 410,653 464,456 53,803 $17,048,600 $19,605,900 $4,274,518 $4,834,561 $560,043 Less 5% Rev Res 652,400 Net Budget 16,196,200 Collections Month Actual FY 15 Cum YTD Budget Collected to Date %over FY 14 collections % over FY 13 collections % over FY 12 collections Oct 684,811 684,811 4.02% 19.12% 9.07% 30.36% Nov 965,779 1,650,590 9.68% 10.24% 31.50 % 39.62% Dec 1,234,208 2,884,798 16.92% 16.82% 28.67% 33.47% Jan 1,949,763 4,834,561 28.36% 28.25% 52.75% 61.33% Feb 0 4,834,561 28.36% n/a nla I n/a Mar 0 4,834,561 28.36% n/a n/a n/a Apr 0 4,834,561 28.36% n/a n/a n/a May 0 4,834,561 28.36% n/a n/a n/a June 0 4,834,561 28.36% n/a n/a n/a July 0 4,834,561 ! 28.36% n/a n/a n/a Aug 0 484,561 8% 26 n!a n/a n/a Sept 3380 3 4,46 n/a n/a n/a Total 4,834,561 Current Forecast 4,834,561 YTD 20.03% 34.37% 44,30% 19,605,900 115.0% Budget Comparison 5 Yr Collect 5 Yr Collect Budgeted Actual Bud t to Actual Current Month History-Cum History-Monthly Collections Collections $ Variance Forecast Oct 3.49% 3.49% 595,571 684,811 89,240 684,907 Nov 8.03% 4.54% 774,277 965,779 _ 191,502 890,418 Dec 13.85% 5.82% 991,655 1,234,208 242,553 1,140,403 Jan 21.80% 7.95 %, 1,355,468 1,949,763 594,295 1,558,788 Feb 34.59% 12.79% 2,179,798 0 n/a 2,506,768 Mar 49.79% 15.20% 2,590,959 0 n/a 2,979,603 Apr 69.10% 19.31% 3,292,420 0 n/a 3,786,283 May 78.91% 9.82% 1,673,511 01 n/a 1,924,538 June 85.23% 6.32% 1,077,171 0 n/a 1,238,747 July 90.15% 4.92% 838,810 0 n/a 964,632 Aug Set 95.41% 5.25% 895,890 0 _ n/a 0 n/a 1,030,273 900,531 100.00% 4.59% 783.070 Total 100.0% 100.0% 17,048.600 4.834.561 1,117,591 1 19605,890 - -- Tourist Tax Revenue Collection Curve - -- - i $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 w $2.5 $2.0 a \,•• a,nae,�e O $1.5 $0.5 $0.0 f 213120164:32 PM HARevenue ReporMMnthly Saba, and TDC Receipts 2 r 00 O N y O N Q N 2 Li L)> U r-+ Ln ti5 CI' d m O F a w u; C7 Kt h h E Q w w M r h vti a� m m U c [x1 N M N C, Q r t(1 tS+ G� r� U m Q vl m io I I I I 1 1 I I F I 1 1 i 1 I I 1 I I , 1 : � 1 f I 1 1 I 1 i i f I i ! : : 1 t 1 1 1 1 i 1 m l �v I m; r l CM 1 of � N m rl 1 I m l m 1 M G 1 1 Ul In 1 C!i M M i (n M 1 VI N i to O! I a M 1 Ic� N 1 d m; a. E; O O O O U O F F H E F F 1 I ! 3 a u a a Ui a Q 3 F 04 W w : U) 1 , I k i 1 1 1 i 1 � I 1 , I F 1 1 ! = « 4 d 1 O d a d a d w Ac f >+ M 1 i i ! I : 1 a 1 1 1 r-+ Ln ti5 CI' d m O F a w u; C7 Kt h h E Q w w M r h vti a� m m U c [x1 N M N C, Q r t(1 tS+ G� r� U m Q vl m io , 1 ,C77i! Ui Q 3 F W w 1 U k a = d U d 1 O d a d a d w Ac f >+ M 1 i i 1 1 w 1 , o U I m . 00 o 0 1 c �y ly w r; ,V t!; 1 FL VI RL N N 1 1 1"7 N 1 t; 1-j r-1 , h 9 r 1 m l m V' 1 1 O' tl1 1 , � X01 a, � o� 1 wI I U d N , G Ln N I o "I in CO a a � 1 > 1n , O 1 � N I N Q OD t Q m, Q r l Q O Q M 1 Q 1 cs z ul 1 Z r i 2 1 ri 3 1 L(i I I ♦y,.i i 1� , r± 1 m l in 0', 1 F v, F N J 12l U m l U 1n U I U M I U t r: Q r l Q U) Q Q ,n , Q Fn , O C� Co I m I o r-+ Ln ti5 CI' d m O F a w u; C7 Kt h h E Q w w M r h vti a� m m U c [x1 N M N C, Q r t(1 tS+ G� r� U m Q vl m io 4 Un Q H m w a w a a h h �x , # m cL' o< 0 IH # 1 p� W C4 I 1 i M h i Ol H 1 OD U o W N 1 Q <J! M 1 N 6� > h I O h I z cn i lD � s r-I H r-a U OD O v !o , 1 I I � f f I i V- co i 1 1 f ; 07 o m N N O N M i 2 I � I ! O I � 1 LL 7 <> U I 1 t1} r M W a O �C, 1 Coq] [H + CA (V , tp t7l i If) O I Cf7 a H I ry O d Cf} ! tD < N I a lfl t a .-{ i E� Yn ! E, co 1 �, O U s l O v, O O M 1 O C N I C c l O E, H N H H n H H H N H h l H I i i W I 1 I i ! Y a, 1 a a p a w W w W t =� w w W I w V} V; r ch :n UJ tp Vl rr. v7 , U 1 I W r 1 i Oi i 1 k i D # a F H I # a x # y� I >!# ! J r q W I x I x H 1W IH £ 3 a 41 gC 2a as �x >ix W W4x Orx a H P Q a C� a a Ck� 011 Ill N 1104 Hc�a toa ad x ta 7Q Wa, I I 1 >1 I H a 1 O q W 1 CY1 W Im V W W W W W W W w W 44 LT. f14 r 1 1 I H r a � I 1-1 U L a 1 M I W I M 1 7 to ! M � 1 h U `'J OD W , q� N h7 6� i r-i i t°) Q1 !�L N = 17 00 1 Q', \D 1 F7 O , N , h Ln F3 r-1 t7 V? ! N W N ! `7 U7 i N+ d+ ! r-I O 1 O I H t 1 I i f i I U G, {J tr, W to 1 W C 1 W O 1 W to i W M 1 W d l W cti I W N I W q rr , q s l p s l q m Ca m G CS h 1 U Y q N 1 I 1 I O G I co ! h, (V , 01+ M 1 O O I ? N > o > N > i > > Ln . M > N O z M z lD z Q I %. 61 1 z d W, %r 7 1 Z M I G, N I CO Oa , i r � i I , M O O •-+ Q M O s i O h l O Lo co 4 Un Q H m w a w a a h h �x , # m cL' o< 0 IH # 1 p� W C4 I 1 i M h i Ol H 1 OD U o W N 1 Q <J! M 1 N 6� > h I O h I z cn i lD � s r-I H r-a U OD O v !o § § 2 2 v 7 Q 2 � k / f \ 2 4 r" f 8 \ 0% 7� in 4^ # # # - J 2 k / �@ WWI §§ 9 q E § LL 7 \� E ! Clt / ui § & ! \ § \ \ \ \ ƒ \ \ \ } f k ] § � WWI E § o E ! ui § § \ \ \ \ ƒ \ \ \ } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . ! \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ � ! \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . ! k _ d B \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ to 8 rl co Lq . ! \ \ \ \ \ \ � � \ ( \ } / \ IM ) \ \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ R- co 7 § n - 7 \ tj \ \ w0e \ \ } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ k # # {� C } C LL \� \ \ \ \ \ \ k k ; \ } It , \ § \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d \ 6 . ! \ \ \ \ \ \ � � \ ( \ } / \ IM ) \ \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ R- § § \ tj \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ § } C . ! \ \ \ \ \ \ � � \ ( \ } / \ IM ) \ \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ R- § § \ § \ \ \ \ \ \ k k \ } § \ § \ ` « 3 § \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } k u . , / ! ik \ \ \ \ \ \ ƒ \ \ \ \ 5 . ! \ \ \ \ \ \ � � \ ( \ } / \ IM ) \ \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ R- � � \ § \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ / /k \�} 0 ) \ 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- ! a § § 7 $ 3 k k § e. 2 . \ f 7 _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ J § c2 o � � \ / E } \ \ \ \ } k } §■ K $ \� � \ § § \ � � \ § \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ / /k \�} 0 ) \ 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- ! a § § $ 3 k { } § § o � §■ § \ \ \ cL _ _ _ _ _ � � \ § \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ / /k \�} 0 ) \ 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- n Q O1 001 n N n N N Cn0 N 7 Z .ti m m ao ro n of m Q N H N 1A N Yf N N N K m N T 0 0 0 n n 0) � O M .Q� pnQ,p1 Om1 V N N N N H N N N N O C W m N N Q VI M n n N O n n O � m e a m a o 0 ni ui e v vi vi ° N N N N V1 N N N V1 Z K 10 m oyo m m o n n N b O O n N O Ot n G N V O M O l0 O Qt0 00 01 O .y N M Q N N N N \ N u1 10 n ao m .o� ti .rv�y m 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 N N N N h Q m � N a m N 14 In L" co N H LA N O�1 n ,'�, I't ch N r r NQ N 44 H N N N N Vf N m 0 O O W � 10 10 N a�a 00 00 N N 0 01 00 m d C N N N N N Vl H Vf N 2 � d m m n n e v o .. $ n v m .e1 liyW� N N N N N N N N N Q N U O W .. 10 1l m N n M t0 in 1D m n 6J > s ry n o . i e ry 10 0 C9 W Q N N N N N N K H N W YQ) N M O O vQl N ~ 111 J n 01 N M n O N M 1l1 J O ni N M N o N ai N ni N o N e N v n h N u o ry m o m O m Q O V1 N N N N H ~ N n Q O1 001 n N n N N Cn0 N 7 Z .ti m m ao ro n of m Q N H N 1A N Yf N N N K m N T 0 0 0 n n 0) � O M .Q� pnQ,p1 Om1 V N N N N H N N N N O C W m N N Q VI M n n N O n n O � m e a m a o 0 ni ui e v vi vi ° N N N N V1 N N N V1 Z K 10 m oyo m m o n n N b O O n N O Ot n G N V O M O l0 O Qt0 00 01 O .y N M Q N N N N \ N u1 10 n ao m .o� ti .rv�y m 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 N N N N Q m Q m m e o YJ N H N N N VT N N N r r N Q O o 1D N 1D N m 0 O O W � 10 10 N a�a 00 00 N N 0 01 00 Q V N N N N N Vl H Vf N r W � g z � O W .. 10 1l m N n M t0 in 1D m n 6J > s ry n o . i e ry 10 0 C9 W QNi g N .Q-1 N .0-1 N N N N h N H eMi N N H W J J O u Q O W N W N N M ~ N m w m a Q o m m n W LL N N N N N N N H n Q O1 001 n N n N N Cn0 N 7 Z .ti m m ao ro n of m Q N H N 1A N Yf N N N K m N T 0 0 0 n n 0) � O M .Q� pnQ,p1 Om1 V N N N N H N N N N O C W m N N Q VI M n n N O n n O � m e a m a o 0 ni ui e v vi vi ° N N N N V1 N N N V1 Z K 10 m oyo m m o n n N b O O n N O Ot n G N V O M O l0 O Qt0 00 01 O .y N M Q N N N N \ N u1 10 n ao m .o� ti .rv�y m 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 N N N N k \ \ k \ \ \ \ \ \ � 7 \ § \ \ \ \ k \ \ k } ® m \ 2_ 5 3 6 5 5}\ } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ k- 2 - § CL - § ° k k \ / § \ \ k 00 46 411. 14 V, _ - - �/ \ § 4)} k \ LL � 7 Lu \� d _ § o ul \ \ \ k \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / Lu 0 k \ \ k \ \ \ \ \ \ � 7 \ § \ \ \ \ k \ \ k } ® m \ 2_ 5 3 6 5 5}\ } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ k- CL § � z \ k \ \ k \ \ \ \ \ \ � 7 \ § \ \ \ \ k \ \ k } ® m \ 2_ 5 3 6 5 5}\ } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ k- § � \ § � . Lu d _ § o ul \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Lu 0 u § ; Go k \ \ k \ \ \ \ \ \ � 7 \ § \ \ \ \ k \ \ k } ® m \ 2_ 5 3 6 5 5}\ } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ k- B k ■ . ! � ! § } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ § § } c / k § \ k R- 2 m ! z t2r- 2 � z ri k \ j \ / Ln k � 2 d $ _ _ _ - - - - LU . , � Aw 4) g \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LU \ \ � \ \ § % _ . O _ 7 to § � \ \ / \ \ \ \ k \ B k ■ . ! � ! § } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ § § } c / k § \ k R- . ! ! ! ! z � z LU § \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LU \ \ \ \ \ \ § % _ _ 7 . ! � ! § } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ § § } c / k § \ k R- § N § § 0 co a. � N • / w 7 2 J 2 J J■ \ %§ _ 7 § « LAj § �2 § §§ § § ƒ in ! ƒ \� � \ } \ \ \ } } } \ \ d } } } § § � w § E 7 § « LAj § § u § ƒ in ! ) z , ■ ƒ \ Z O N N N N iD W N R' {Wj N N N N M M M mQ_ a C K 0p m N O 01 �D N tD W Qh V1 V1 N VI N N VNI Z K N N N W T Ul O N V1 N Vf N N N W �O ^ W OI O ry M Q of O O N N N N O N N Q v0 '0 LL N N N N N N N N N N O O N N N N O n N N N I O , N N IA C 00 d H N M m Q YN1 O N N N N N O w N n p� 0�1 w W P~II 171 N N D> N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H r C m W � ui N � vWi iv uO1i °m ^ N N h N vomi y N N x m Il m o0 0 o W W LL ^ N N N N N H N N N a Q > m N m N m N o N o N N v00i N N U Y1 O Q W W N 1 7 M.Q+ Q O H N .Q+ N T .^y N OM1 .Ni N N uoi N N .W+ 41 O^f .Q+ N N ti N m N Z O N N N N iD W N R' {Wj N N N N M M M mQ_ a C K 0p m N O 01 �D N tD W Qh V1 V1 N VI N N VNI Z K N N N W T Ul O N V1 N Vf N N N W �O ^ W OI O ry M Q of O O N N N N O N N Q v0 '0 LL N N N N N N N N N N O O N N N N 7I N N N H N M m Q YN1 N N N N N N h N N W Q b N N 2 H N . N pp 10 N OWO VN1 O ti N N N H � ui N � vWi iv uO1i °m ^ N N h N vomi N N N x m Il m o0 0 o W W F ^ O n N N N OI � NCC a n N m N m N m N o N o N N v00i N N G O 2 ~ Z m o N m N Z Z u v � LLAO J K pp O b N N N Q -It lm0 0 K N W 0? H Q m h .N-I •N-1 "� VTf Z O N N N N iD W N R' {Wj N N N N M M M mQ_ a C K 0p m N O 01 �D N tD W Qh V1 V1 N VI N N VNI Z K N N N W T Ul O N V1 N Vf N N N W �O ^ W OI O ry M Q of O O N N N N O N N Q v0 '0 LL N N N N N N N N N N O O N N N N O N O m l0 Q N H N H N Vf N N N ZI INll OOi W M N H N V1 N N m W n YI $ V 1p ry N o .+ at Q 00 N O n N N N N N N N H N LA LA N H N N N N N N N N O dw M a � a O M N m N N O rl N M N N N H N el Ln el N N W N W N N N N N N N N N r N Y Z < ti N a r v N m m l6 N K 2 O Ol N 00 01 W U a .0 w N LL aTlf N N N N N N N Q ` ��y N U/ N T N N M (J O m e n m N V1 N ry ti m L7 N N N N N N N Q N N O N O m l0 Q N H N H N Vf N N N ZI INll OOi W M N H N V1 N N m W n YI $ V 1p ry N o .+ at Q 00 N O n N N N N N N N H N Y ti N N N O T N Q N 1p O O n O 1 N n Owl N Z YN�I .ai N N N H N N V VI N N N N H V1 h Vl N N C m N n N Q N m N N limit ITO � W1p m m ry a .+ o Ln v Ln W N h N N N H N N N N K m O N 01 N lO N O n ti N OT1 N Vd1 Om1 N ON N N V) N Vf N N V1 Z K p o .nil ao e m m m m N h h N H N W N N Q l0 n 00 Ol O ti N � � Vl Y N N N N N N O N N N Q lYi N N N N lOY N N N N N~ H N N N N N N N N � a Z < ti N a r v N m m O {:1 U a W Q Y N T N N M (J m H N � N N V1 N N VTNi h Y ti N N N O T N Q N 1p O O n O 1 N n Owl N Z YN�I .ai N N N H N N V VI N N N N H V1 h Vl N N C m N n N Q N m N N limit ITO � W1p m m ry a .+ o Ln v Ln W N h N N N H N N N N K m O N 01 N lO N O n ti N OT1 N Vd1 Om1 N ON N N V) N Vf N N V1 Z K p o .nil ao e m m m m N h h N H N W N N Q l0 n 00 Ol O ti N � � Vl Y N N N N N N O N N N Q lYi N N N N lOY N N N N N~ co § ! � ! ; k 0 5 5\ 5& 5; ■, ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- 2� 2§ b \ 14 K k k 5 2 k k k E k - $ k / 11 cn k 4n ® ® ® _ _ _ ��\ LU o k \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ § u 0: § ± | } } } § \ 6 } } } \� § \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ f 7 ) z co § ! � ! ; k 0 5 5\ 5& 5; ■, ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- \ - $ k § LU o k \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ § u 0: § 0 u | } } } § \ 6 } } } co § ! � ! ; k 0 5 5\ 5& 5; ■, ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- �a k B ! . ! ( . i 0 , lm� � . . d ! �k B 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ) \ w J 'k ' k ' 2 f 5/ . f f & \ } f k § Go �%� § k� k § u cc 17 2 \� t \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ [ k | a § § q \ k �a k B ! . ! ( . i 0 , lm� � . . d ! �k B 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ) § ' d \ k E k § Go § u cc 2 �a k B ! . ! ( . i 0 , lm� � . . d ! �k B 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ) & ! k \ \ f } \ \ \ } \ # ` 8q § & { \ 2 \ § ) ) I 5 ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ° \ § L2 't 14 2 § � 2 . \ \ ƒ % ® 44 40V - - ® 46 _ [■ 2 �2 z § \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ■ § a a uj , k \} 0 � ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ k I \ \ \ \ } ) } \ « § & { \ ) \ \ \ } 5 \ G \ \ \ } \ \ } \ & ! k \ \ f } \ \ \ } \ # ` 8q § & { \ 2 \ § ) ) I 5 ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ° \ § � [■ 2 z § \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ■ § a a uj k � ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & ! k \ \ f } \ \ \ } \ # ` 8q § & { \ 2 \ § ) ) I 5 ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N M N N N N N N N N N oc� n n o ro m pm n n Qm Jl m N OO O W O QV ry ao n m m n K N o m n `fin M C ao o «� N_ a3 14 o J o r. fv N ui LM Ln N m M of M e O c uP N N N O N �' N N N N N 4% Yf N fA N ry m ppp N a N m N m r a n vi N VNI Z Q v j w z ao o 2 co °e W m m N N N N o N N N N m y LL r VI h N N N N Q \ U/ � n T n N Y1 Y1 N M O Q N N N N N � M m ion m N m e o ti N m m �I N N N N h N N N H N N M N V vnl N N N M N N N N N N N N N oc� n n o ro m pm n n Qm Jl m N OO O W O QV ry ao n m m n K N N_ D: J O Q LL Z J = C � n io o N v'^i m N m m n N h m a n N ry m ppp N a N m N m r a n vi N VNI Z Q v z W O V °e W N h N N N N N N N N N N N N M C N V1 Q OO W N N O Z N N M T O N O N 4A � N Vf N V1 Vf N H N N N C m m m N m m ti b m w a e ti Nrvi iry N n N N N N VI N N W w m ° H O N N N N N yy H 6 O N VI N N N h W O n 00 m O •+ �"� M � � O O O O J O O O LL N N 0 N N N N N N N ~ k k \ f k } } \ \ ( E \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ƒ $ k 7 \ ( ( ( ( § ( ( \d ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- § e M Colo § _ % f£» k § § k \ _ _ _ _ A6 44 eq 1^ _ !/ � // - \ §) 3 � LL 7 E E � 3 }\ ■ 0 _ 0 ` ® ! \ \ \ k It \ k d \ } \ \ \ \ } / k k \ f k } } \ \ ( E \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ƒ $ k 7 \ ( ( ( ( § ( ( \d ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- § � - \ � f E � • ) _ \ \ \ k \ \ k 0 u ! k \ \ \ } \ \ \ \ \ k k \ f k } } \ \ ( E \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ƒ $ k 7 \ ( ( ( ( § ( ( \d ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R- 2 r W O r CL N O N 00 2` C N 0) 2 ' LL .- Q � U �l � Q V 0 � of u � GC S W 0 J � J 0 0 C 01 pN�pp .pptipp "O . 4 .� O .4 1, 1a- n �D tD l N rl L^/1 N O taV� N 0 Ln aN Ln wi 0% 000 CA KI N 1, M 00 M 00 rl �4 O W N N r1 �"� 11 N N N N s N VT V' N V? V? N in N W Q Oppt N lD n O1 y n Vl � N VI h N N V! N ti N � L) n n n Io I� n n oo m a N h V1 h N N N N h v lri vi o � of o ,� of n n W Y) N t0 n W Oml Vf N N 1A V1 N N N N O O pnpp N OMO Q .�-� O N m N lD 1p l0 N � N N h h N l/1 Vf N Vf amp VN1 ti W ti n 1 VI W Ol a0 n Y �N�11 N V1 N O1 OI H nl Ol N 0 O ✓I V1 00 O l lD O tll C p oppf l0 lC rtpp1 Q R l0 O V N � IIl n N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N V m o°o m ro C W O N N 1p YI lQ N � rai m m m o o m Im+l n N N N N N N IV N N aA N N 1A i/1 N N h LLI m m ul N ao o m m o � lnn m r uNi u�i m a In m n w m I I I m o N N NVf V! VI N N N VI N YI n pOp 00 n Ol m 00 lO O n m 0 l0 O Of Z O O N ti O O N N VNl T Vl N N H N N N N N N n ML Ol h Ln �o 01 at b N M C M 0 N W W O N \O C N Of O N N DD V1 O Q Ol N N N N H ll�l M N co C W Q W t0 m W O VI Ol al OI P Ln N M � N u1 Ol N 0�1 .N-i � i0 vl O III lC Ul n � m .-� Q t0 tp0f N W l+Ml W Ol W N N N N N N N N N N CAC February 23, 2015 VIII -1 New Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a proposal from Humiston & Moore Engineers for Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring for 2015 under Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order for a not to exceed amount of $163,795.00 and makes a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To move forward with the annual required beach and inlet monitoring surveys and reports for Collier County Beaches and Inlets for 2015. CONSIDERATIONS: The Coastal Zone Management (CZM) department is tasked with the maintenance and monitoring of over thirty (30) miles of coastline, beaches, estuaries, channels, and bays. CZM has specific goals, objectives, and criteria to meet as identified within the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Land Development Code, and the Codes of Laws and Ordinances regarding the county's coastal aquatic resources. In order to meet these goals and objectives, CZM has been charged with a variety of programs including the implementation of beach re- nourishment and dredging projects, the artificial reef program, derelict vessel program, waterways marker program, as well as any related operations that are required to maintain the health, aesthetics, and safety of the county's coastal waterways and communities. Yearly physical monitoring of the beaches and inlets is required by FDEP permit. Results of this report are used to evaluate, recommend and prioritize annual beach segment renourishment. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds have been budgeted and approved for this activity in FY 2014/15 fund 195 Tourist Development Tax. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this item. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. —CZM RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approves a proposal from Humiston & Moore Engineers for Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring for 2015 under Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute a work order for a not to exceed amount of $163,795.00 and makes a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachments: 1) Proposal; 2) Work Order HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS ' COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING February 10, 2015 Mr. Gary McAlpin Coastal Zone Management Collier County Government 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Proposal for Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring for 2015 Collier County Contract 13 -6164 HM File NO 23- 065.2015Beach- Monitor Dear Gary: CAC February 23, 2015 VIII -1 New Business 1 of 5 5679 STRAND COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 FAX:239 594 2025 PHONE: 239 594 2021 As requested, we are providing a proposal for the monitoring surveys and monitoring reports for Collier County Beaches and Inlets in 2015. Cost breakdown as shown 49% H &M and 51% sub- consultant. 1. South Marco; Wiggins and Doctors Passes - Scope of Work and Budget Conduct the annual monitoring survey for Wiggins Pass consistent with the monitoring plan approved by the Department of Environmental Protection. This scope of work consists of FDEP monuments R -10 to R- 22 R -11.5, R -14.5, R -17.5, R -18.5, R -20.5, the MHWL from R -17 NE for a minimum of 1500 feet. Stations - 2 +00 to 15 +00 (from R -15 to R -18) and the navigation channel with grid lines 100 feet apart (C -1 thru C- 34, CS -35, CN35- CN37). Data Collection Budget (SDI) ...................$ 19,455 Conduct the annual monitoring survey for Doctors Pass consistent with the monitoring plan approved by the Department of Environmental Protection. This scope of work consists of 77 Dredge Template Profiles and nine beach profiles R -59, 60, 60 +518, 61, 61 +408, 61 +816, 62, 63, and 64. Data Collection Budget (SDI) ...................$ 12,710 Conduct the annual monitoring survey for South Marco consistent with the monitoring plan approved by the Department of Environmental Protection. This scope of work consists of FDEP monuments R -139 to R -148, G -1 thru G -5, K -1 thru K -2, and borrow area. Data Collection Budget (SDI) ...................$ 14,290 Sub Total Data Collection Budget (LS) ..... $ 46,455 Reports (3) (H &M) (T &M) .......................$ 49,400 Subtotal (SDI + H &M) ...........................$ 95,855 CAC February 23, 2015 VIII -1 New Business 2of5 2. Collier Beaches Conduct the annual monitoring survey for Collier consistent with the monitoring plan approved by the Department of Environmental Protection. This scope of work consists of FDEP monuments R -17 to R -84 and R -58A. (69 profiles). Data Collection Budget (SDI) (I.S) ............ $ 37,540 Report (1) (H &M) (T &M) .........................$ 30,400 Subtotal (SDI + H &M) ...........................$ 67,940 Grand Total (SDI + H &M) $ 163,795 Tasks will be billed on a time and materials basis, unless otherwise noted. The budgets for these tasks may therefore be considered as not -to- exceed amounts with the understanding that in the event regulatory requirements or requests from County staff result in Additional Services exceeding the estimated budget amounts, a budget amendment will be requested. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS Brett D. Moore, P.E. President CAC February 23, 2015 VIII -1 New Business 3of5 Marco Island Central Beach Re- Grading Project Design, Permitting, Consruction Phases Date:Februa 10, 2015 Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring Tasks for Design and Permitting 1. South Marco, Wiggins and Doctors Passes 2. Collier Beaches _ 1. South Marco, Wiggins and Doctors Passes Data Collection LS) _ Annual Monitoring Surve AMOUNT Wiggins Pass Lump Sum Sea Diversified, Inc. 19,455.00 Doctors Pass Lump Sum Sea Diversified, Inc. 12,710.00 South Marco Lump Sum Sea Diversified, Inc. 14,290.00 46,455.00 LS Analysis and Report Preparation of 3 Reports (T &M) _ RATE/UNIT HOURS/Q COST MARKUP AMOUNT PRN2 Principle Engineer 206 40 8,240.00 SEN Senior Engineer 157 0 0.00 PJTM Project Manager 147 0 0.00 SIDS En ineer 1 123 240 29,520.00 SIN SeniorDesi_g_ner 1141 0 _ 0.00 SCI Designer 94 0 0.00 SRT Senior Technician 85 75 6,375.00 INS Ins ector 76 0 0.00 TEC Technician 72 60 4,320.00 CAD_ Cadd Technician 81 0 0.00 Pad Clerical/Administrative 62 10 620.00 PLOTTING, BOND 25 0 1 0.00 _ PLOTTING, VELLUM 10 _ 0.00 EXPENSE - mailings, 0 0.00 EXPENSE' 0 3_2_5.00 49.400.001 T &M TOTAL 1 95,855.00 CAC February 23, 2015 VIII -1 New Business 4 of 5 Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring February 2015 Contract 13 -6164 Date:February 10, 2015 Collier County Beaches and Inlets Annual Monitoring Tasks for Design and Permitting 1. South Marco, Wiggins and Doctors Passes 2. Collier Beaches - 2. Collier Beaches Data Collection (LS) Annual Monitoring Survey AMOUNT Collier Beaches Lump Sum Sea Diversified, Inc. 3.7,540.00 I 37.540.00 LS Analysis and Report Preparation of 1 Report (T &M) RATEIUNIT HOURS/OT COST MARKUP AMOUNT PRN2 Princi le Engineer 206 20 4,120.00 SEN Senior Engineer 157 0 i 0.00 PJTM _ _ Project manager 147 0 0.00 SDS Engineer 123 145 17,835.00 SIN Senior Designer 114 0 0.00 SCI Desi ner 94 0 0.00 SRT Senior Technician 85 50 4,250.00 INS Inspector 76 0 _ 0.00 TEC Technician 72 501 _3,600.0_0 _ CAD Cadd Technician 81 I 0 _ 0.00 Pad Clerical/Administrative/ dmin 62 5 310.00 PLOTTING, BOND 25 0' 0.00 PLOTTING, VELLUM_ 10' 1 0.00 EXPENSE - mailings, copying 01 I 0.00 EXPENSE 01 - 285.00 I 30,400.00!(T &M) TOTAL I 67,940.00 CAC February 23, 2015 VIII -1 New Business 5of5 Summary CAC February 23, 2015 VIII -2 New Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Wiggins Pass Interim Dredging Project OBJECTIVE: To review and discuss the Wiggins Pass Interim Dredging Project. CONSIDERATIONS: Wiggins Pass was straightened in 2011. The attached presentation and files review the results of the renourishment and outline an intermediate dredging project that was anticipated on a two -year intermediate cycle FISCAL IMPACT: N/A GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: For review and discussion. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: N/A RECOMMENDATION: To review and discuss the Wiggins Pass Interim Dredging Project. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachments: 1) Wiggins Pass Straightening Implementation; 2) Draft Technical Specification; 3) Bid schedule and questionnaire; 4) Wiggins Pass Plans LO U) CC 'an) N N C C C`i C N [p Z 3 R m 2 Z a. CU N U- Q > U .O bn c cu E G w a.j -a E C C: w 4A O fII •- N O N 1 N .O CAA � i O U w U c tko c c � N m c C) .� M w F� °6 wo c m E w c a m 1 c S 4-j Q� N N m O c U co U •ice+ z v v a a v N 0 O V O V i .v V L� O U D w a c .Q Q L �) N N C - N M 7 N [p N N 7 Z 2 `N N Q > U i LO T W Q .m W t/CL O m L �Q CL O co 66 W C6 V cn U c L W c O U ^O ��W/ {.ice N c V O _O LL E O w W U N 00 O m 5O ^L' W N v O w (O L O J ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ U O L O V L Ln O U N _� 75 V) 4A .c O .c O 2 L 1 ■ . ■ C- N E v Q� E-, to a. O bz U V U ro m • O � 4-J C6 o a� O u r U � m � 4-J _0 U (a) .O 4- cn (a) C6 O C- V) L 4-J r C: • (a) V) (3) Q CL Q J im U E C U_ O L E '> O O � V .Ln O U 4— O t� O a--j • �0� 4J V L a-J O U il � V � V U O k.0 U 0 ro O 000 CU O aJ u M a� C: Un O ro V ° C +' C o V ai E Q o Ln O O a- 0 Ov O c;-- 0 E E -Z ~- 06 O M c c cri '� U r-i O m m 4J — ?� L- _0 O O N W =3 — _N V n , W (W , 1 T v' ° Q Q m (� =3 Q) O O u u -j a--� M hA 4A 4A ° V V dJ a) Q) _ — 0 0 0 = m LL (n LO O N N N C O M j 2� 3 m � 2 Z a. (U N LL Q > U to Y Z 4 C� 0,. �w �F- �F- 0 U) ZU) W� od a U U (t; J ~ d _j LLJ d cc Od �< 00 O a {i} Lo ro T d LIJ LLJ> ..;. m s a 00 tip W � U� d W m O oW U)aw ry I oQ wx< i o °d i I � I S I I a i $I i I i i I I 1 M / U J / I` 1 1i 1 s a W j CD O oW U)aw ry I oQ wx< i o °d Z U) I vOQa. Co I ! ! � J ! d dw 1 n w = O of Q �¢ 1 J m U1 d Q °° � a 1 I U °w; / y� I 0Wd ®1 L,c O J cr =cn 1 I ?Qr 1 1 a.Z L O 1 1 ir)1 I + ~ e� } ce ,» - VriaL �� ' r i, t M r 1 gy-.mN N - ._,44, i 1 N m -- f :x"-— .0 -Z { A _x •i -4'Z�5 I 414 A �M* ...,••• 4011111 ilk . 7 --All; .ti � a i :. --,-.,:=.a ja . , y X39. r qii )1101' p b 4 „ 0 C i. 0 CO Q a� to Q. Q O m O O U Lo N ,0 M 47 N N O m N O r....1 N 7 Z -8 N N N LL Q > U { ,1 in in n 2 en I M 11' , ri o :a. 1, L ____■ b ( f N., A t ,4 • ....... p ,4 p, ic ., i‘ C 4 t' O1 .T 1 figi: , c • "h j lg- ,&,- a) 1 W l4 ' f, ,..... Q N a) ru _.c , LL It I , .., CZ 13 Ch - r- 0 Sil■ ■ } ti ■`:7i 4 O O Q O b t I 1;+1i ,. / co 't` 0 L. a) 4— 1 t, 40.ti. l : LO CA co , l N CO , ca 0 7 Z N N ll. Q > U fr ,e :}.f on �j W 2 H UJ Q n1 Z z � dU C7 F may• ' t :'�_,.._ . ___„____ . ,. . _ wt., , �t ,r..., �`. , ..._ v) ,„...,. 1 . . Itt _r:2 ,_ . . c/7 t 4 _{ .:-...-.,.`=.42-.... a;;0 i5 ,i - »' '��,�'� �' O Z \._\ .-.,--:' --;..— . ., -- .,, - 1110111111 Ofil \ 2 < II- ,,- ,4111101111111 cc _ tn .e ms .,,,,_.,,,•,„ Fo : g1 . 3 m 5' • x � w � O co 0� f : N CO CO 0 c d b7 1 • l U� O W ii u.r i r o o w r n s,Aik, " x. '' Er t :: 'l w a o as m powle,s CCI U .t.,, •1.n.- 4•,-",;:.• -' ' ' 4 :. ■■•• ' flr Cf. •-• 4''''.1.,*11,....'. 4:4 14 ; 'A " ' ''' ';',C-%.,....• r • .,,,ii,7!:-''''''ler ,..... A 00 U is 0 '''.' •' -41$. 4-4-.' . e-Ni, .., . , .' ,...f o cu.... Et cr, - .4 ; I. - 4i . ,- )4,; ' • . . .- ' .. 4 l't •- - CV C 0 - N CO 7 C\I 02 ' - (D - - , , ,, , .,.:;., ..„... , . ..... .. , m a.) 2 z . ''...:614,47..• - ... - .c,,.. . ,..., t - ,„:-....1 .• , u_ = i• ..... ....„ _. , .. . ..,, • .. ... (...) 5 E 0 - , ,- ... e '' . C ., ., • .... .- ....% . .....:„.. -.. . CO ,. ' . . Ar • 0) - r c , • .. .. .. ... : . .. ., r - -4 4' -..• - - - . . ,:. 0) ..... -0 .... . . a..) C .— . .. . . . C2I . ... . ,314..„ „ •- .':'... . .. ' , . 0 ..„. '1 • ••••••I 4.1.) $ . (...) .1. ,., si.... i,. D A 4 ) .„, (1) ,.„ C 0 li U II!. ., ..,. ,. .7 . • , . , t't _, ... 1 1 ',' -• (4r) . -,.....- . : tA IF N LL U 5 (_) e C CO • 1 if. 0 • c , I s• •,, }, I C R S I f O a.) 'l, 7 O 1 1 Tj • 1 ��' • I Sumo I Z w >. W _- 1 _ Qg 'Q v" 6 J Q L4 Z W �. � 4 co Q Qw � Z w 2 a Etc H Y U Z Zc4 - (vU 0 a N NQ X i O O� W 1 1 W � ti X t 144- Z. ^ r s V 1 r- q -'C u M 3 ' , 1\\\\\\\\\\\ .f� 'W "'4 ({ \ • , 1J--,.. . . t. , , ... .f...: —,-.. raiiiii.--- ------ , \ \\ w,.. \ \\ \ \ 0 , -- - , , , \ \ 111111111111111■11 \. L .. ,.... r,,.., t z, z, _. „ ... • : .. , .. , N .13 V J V i ° •• 73 14 e VI I 0 it J o W V W O O # ° - � Off' co 02 , V, (ri. a .,i y } In NCO N N ,NE) C O C 0 C) j N CO N N M N 4) M t r ( � f N o "1"5 imiC . IA..;. e,, 1 • Z/ PI:rf I /wj '-.C.V / • 'fi r`': C D - - 1' O _W U , 0 , _ 0 U „w .. r 4 U? PT' U _ ; 4 . C a) ......r : s� N J Cy J 'J `, 'J 9 J .l,. It s C2I U N- I N— L) C ) N O N N C O M z N • N [p '- IC/ ) VI' { 7 Z It,. CD N } U w ' _T I T , . < iti 'k 7 off'. CU , ci.) . ., . , ....• s.... . • O • , .. . ti . 4- 4u } m ...:,.._ , . . !. ,,,i, . ..., .. • . ,... .:,„.., .4 . .„, � � U co a) 4 .. ,_ . .. : .... , „ .,„ . .„..... . , .,,.... ..... . .,L ,.. . co . •,_ . ..,„. _.. „.:._ :,._ .• ,..„ , ... .. .. -I...) ..,. „.. . „ . , . o ., �.' ., . •. O �!... . .. 4 cu . . .` ,. L.... Co .. '). i •W L s q5 It , r , • Lt) (UC N O N N C 0 j N CO 2 3 ca (1) 2z a 4) N U 0 • 0 cr..1 U L° ((',3 � E U N O U)w N C 0 ri 7) `t N m as 3 R U) 7 Z U) N LL Q > U r. C .1 C U 0 LO •— � o : ' E w....4 c 4 _ 0 M Q Ua `� CO 1,1 a3 CD O fir. t i' v V N C, s $ 0 -1--, E o , : ., , IA Li- CV ` • r- ,L c 1 M S N >+ - .0 '" a 0 j co a 1. a t. O i Z ( il V Li) Cl) (0 N CN O (I) 0 CO N C O M j m r ( N N Z a « N N (0) CUCI) LL 05 V) try .1.-) a) C a--' C >> CO COW CO o E ago — o E C co. we.) •— Q) E •— W0 C co -a cu o < V L— V V C 0 a E z co E 7 .-0 ago •— C CL,,,ma�xx O • �J CD b E N fII Lj'� •— .— C6 C O CO V O N a) scb _D o'- o — •_ E m -2 E 'E w v - 'O W C 1.— " ' L- 0 E 2 -I-) o 7 0 41- — co (13e— C 0_ cc 'a) of = co 0 0 I 2 I 2 I ....1 *tr.) • • • • C..) LO co co N O N N N C O M j CO N m ?: \ Z CD- P 4 W " �� U j , I . _• ° TTiR-)■1,, A\\,';��1 n, ..... 7 7 ....., \\\ ...\._____:: -.. ...,) 0 8,,,.- •_ -� s ,; C CO • ammo \V: g ' < L` zi ,k � k, o a-■1 c �:, •— Nor- AN .,. .7/\\\V .C'' -.;‘ i f awas: 0 73 CU i 'I' 1 , ....,_ 2 " r V {* .. , ' 7 I _„ l y il cz E .-- , . \ l'‘ gi t ti ti_ •PHJ -. 111 gg�'p>5'$g iE�•d ' CCHI In N C9 c O N N C O N C7 j n N p] = z a . CD N Q 0 \ N'61116r 'k\,,, ': ;'*: '7A7- -\___r / \ Z r ,, ---. ,,,,\„,, ti, \\ ,,/, /, . . ,,9 ) ,c, X; 1 N u , .,L,_,,,/ s\'-fit.,,,,__ 0 -.." i)lk.L. . ' .`,n I::' le ''----/ - ''' ,,\, ' ^ 0 r' i,A 14, - may { , e ... � o se te * -7.5 il • _ of_ t, . -- ___—___-_- 9 Z 1. ___—----------•---_______ ____ DH, ---______.n- .,...___J___.__._._.___..______ 2 ---------,.-----_,\ ___-_____ .... / ..„ , .....__, ..„--, ......, n U r V/ cfl �. 3 x oho §a m N m V co 0 14j y i a-s Z m \U • ••• d Z a I 9 O a It \ r�� i L, 3 1 & Q 1.. f , L b O Z V i 1 �f > 0 �� ,�. V�x 4-l' $I It; .. i' •O ` to U xs O N (I) . > O ,':j ''l ,.. iti. .:. . N n , ,,, ,,,, ,:, U , ,:,.. V Lo N N •- O N /• ` - N C O `\1V, M 7 N m � N N i CO = z C L_ LL = a) Q C >' E - 4 > a' -a C CD W gIMI 0 o co a) Ca a) •— � •— ' O O CD a) co co E 0 .4...a) _a c +-, cu (o) E C� � cu 4 a C - ca -0 4-5 — Co • . .. O CD C y._ a) . ez E '— .n CD O - V C 1.. - J o 4-',„ c r- c cu ocu RI a) — o .- '— ca }, 2 �, •— — a) •— �' a--) 03 -0 D a) � .c •tao CD I" ro c ctuj E 2 ...... en -c er: .— 4) v) -0 C M ID E s- vi cri `�- '—I c To� a� a. O 0 0 1 .� C C >- N � ago -ET2 cu -0 O O c6 03 i- =v) m '0 0 -0 � can Li N- N N 0 N Ax i CV C O " c M m N i ` ! • 1—J N 7Z - / co 4_, `� 0 CU N 0 LL S L N O . . O +-+ 0 c n1 J a- o '� V O 73 CO 4a eL i" t�A .0 _c c 0 a) •- +-, '— T "0 .4-; > = O a) n E c) to L- a) O = 0 c 0 = � -E .r: > +-• t.) cutbo --a) -t73 m O c CD a,, cD o ._ S E •�. c 1 co co E D `n O 4) U c V 0 Lis = a) 4) c 0 1 CL a) co Q— 0. 0 V) a) O v) -0 CL _C *+7• CL -a E co W ' U .1--0 L7 i CO ca ' O O a Z 4 co M 0 tmi = O n N O O d- o) O CI O 0 0(Ni NI Ni (.) N Lo e, <0 N .- N N O N = O M S' N N c S 3 2 Z N 0 M L!) r-I Cr) 0 0 I.n 00 I1') 00 0 co r-I r1 N ct LE) Ln d' r1 M 00 L N m 00 trl rn rn 0 cm lfl r1 m Ln m 0 5 M Ni' lD al r-1 co" O 00 00 m N ,-'I U r-I N N Cr C lD N r-I r-I co e-1 e-I N O I i N MI O C7::;" O O u1 �n N N 1-711-6 M 00 N N N oo ri m ri 0o I` m U) N r-I N CD N c-I N to 00 r-I N CL d' CO Ql al C N Ln CO lO 6 N 1.� i--I O ,—In O I� O O M D1 I r1 N N rmi .,∎ O N N U N CO r-I N 1 0 C 0 lD LI d r* N o0 00 cm N r-I 00 lD r-i tr) m m 0 DD m Ql CO _ ,�, cm 00 CO Li) N N lD m .:t C N d N c-I N CO' N lD '71 0 O m CO r-I r-I r-I r-i 0 M r-I V O V +r O a) u) I.n r-I t\ N I\ m lD O O M N N CO N Dl M M N 0 N 1-1 lD N N O C71 01 0 In In 0 0 0 �"1- O C 4 11 r-i r-i r-1 :: > U 'i Ur° 0 4... VI Z w 0 s COI v G L GA fns m lD 110 ri a 6 cc O C O O ` O N m C7 Ln to 134 r. 00 G1 O r-I 0) ++ C O r-I r-I r1 e-I r.4 MO ri ri r-I N N s. N t� Cl. cc cc as cc cc cL 0c cc cc ti m m OCCI N It) N(0 Ts a)to(V N ,C O M 7 Nm N C o Z v N N LL 0 0 0 0 1-1-• 0 0 a In o N- 0 CO N- 0 + N "...cN M N N _ N f O N a N * N c 4 N in Q - f , M a rr •■• , %will N .r i a 03 � a� pj N �/ t N O a t � a 03 a) a n ix m 1 ad ds M w r O ,- — + u, Q OZ F=- wf •- Off' Q Q OC ci 0 wD IC •r-w 0C3 (nC CDJ Z 0 01 o}- CD za N �� as o z + j Zz (N o) p Cti• c/) O O N C 0 O O CO 7 N N p] r^� CO O V) 2Z O W CU�` N N Q > U v u E w O U.; L..) v. 0 p s U Q N , V _C O ,J Q WI . 06 (3.) 00 as (113 cn N(V ZS N C O• N m N Z3 way 2 Z • N N LL Q > 0 t ro I •..ti, ,, et,_e" 7 . 46 '') /l/P .„--- a f . . , , . ,. ..... , . . 3 U N O �r • IP J LL �_ I j Q U z .' ! I-4 • t f y I. 11 to a k' ° f t l • YY .4fy ; .'..._ i A 3 L. 1 i ''. U . LO CO3(.0 N Cl N,C O M 7 N N m as ma) 2z 1)« a)(N LL a > U `-. a <+' '✓- �t a� .8 ^te .R::.- . A!f 1 , fi z r . , . f h_ i� y x .' m O K,w may �� +r,, . +f - te' ? z ';`'''':*5-"::,::;:..-..,,','4.-4‘.. oM ;,-1o":." 2 = N U` :.^� -':.;:Ro'''•:,,-,.'a7; a ►,w to c� O z ri `" r. w z o z . '4 cc _ < o oten • ^} 11111 ai _ Sill 1 • Si I- J N,‘�� g N� � ti � .t u d W Z z 4` te s � M Q,, „ N W'r) r^r v 4' it o LL - . C , U CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 1 of 31 WIGGINS PASS 2015 INTERIM DREDGING PROJECT COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 15- MARCH 2015 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ZON e °; AGEMENT DEPAR ,NT Collier Coun ty Go e` :ment 2800 North Horseshoe 'Fries. Naples,FL 34104 }fly Design Professional: CB&I Coastalanning& Engineering,Inc. 4 NW Boca Raton Blvd. B i pis 'u I FL 33431 `'`' +�k (561)391-8102 4 "11f11'lll� 1`f X111 STEPHEN KEEHN, P.E.NO. 34857 DATE CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 2 of 31 WIGGINS PASS 2015 INTERIM DREDGING PROJECT COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 15- MARCH 2015 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS I. INTRODUCTION 1.0 BASE BID S.�>> � TS-1 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT # TS-2 3.0 ORDER OF WORK AND PROJECT SCHEDULE ' TS-2 iota?[i11 II. WIGGINS PASS INTERIM DREDGING EDGING 1.0 WORK ' jE€€e TS-2 2.0 ACCESS LIMITATIONS ="� ar TS-4 3.0 ORDER OF WORK AND METHODS €° TS-5 4.0 NOTICE TO MARINERS TS-6 5.0 SOIL CONDITIONS ,4:. .,�° TS-7 6.0 EXCAVATION TS-7 7.0 EXCAVATION MATERIAL DISPOSAL TS-10 8.0 SURVEYS ,s ` , € TS-11 9.0 MOBILIZATIC MOBILIZATION TS-14 eeII. E IRONMENTAL PROTECTION ° kr 1.0 EN D ENT,'44'4'0 s91 - " TS-15 L u 1 'E ai9 2.0 �I �r Ild€aoa,:Y� 3,UP ;d TS-23 3.0 RESTRICTI•°.( F AC ' ' B THE PUBLIC TS-23 4.0 �dY RKS AND P S AC ,47.- TS-23 "Ih[q,, LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix No qp , A Sample Daily Quality Control Report, Wiggins Pass B Sediment QA/QC Plan C Wiggins Pass Permits and Variances D Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging Plans E Physical Monitoring Plan CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 3 of 31 WIGGINS PASS 2015 INTERIM DREDGING PROJECT COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 15- MARCH 2015 I. INTRODUCTION Collier County, Florida will conduct a navigation channel interim dredging project within Wiggins Pass. The project is to be completed with a backhoe exca - clam shell, dragline, small dredge, or other equipment as selected by the CONTRA. �T'OR. ''The project will be awarded to the lowest responsive bidder with the quickest subs, '{�" ed schedule. It is essential 6,a that dredging is completed at the fastest practical schedul It is sired that dredging is complete within 30 days of the Notice to Proceed, before the start of s-(Ai le nesting season on May 1. 1.0 BASE BID. '1'' $�S ��f IIEE,��s��Ey� 33 E j ex 1.1 Wiggins Pass Interim Dredging Project The project will provid . _ eted maintenan - 'r edging of the Wiggins Pass navigation channel by dre•;., ' I ., ree areas. A's' `. ...:: ately 9,400 cy of beach compatible sand is to be dre•.;ed "'e a :e ebb, florin ".nd south channels. Only a portion of the permitted channels it ° dredged, focused on removing the greatest ohs . to navigation Bid alternatives are included, but are subject to funding .uY:1 a 'r`w and a separate notice to proceed. All dredging will occur withi a,` horde pproved with the 2012 permit and each area has been previous M.t redge. „,3 he required -0 ging channel depth ranges are shown in Table 1 and equal t®'' a maximum permitted depths. x ��, omp FA�; sand will se disposed of in the ebb shoal disposal Area(A) or the 0°aE�u I th y hoal aasoisal Area (B) as selected by the CONTRACTOR. The ML COUNTY e .. es tha", i lsposal Area B be completely filled. All Work can be Trc done from th 4,ater. A backhoe or other equipment may be used from the sand 0 i adjacent trsisposal Area B and dredge Area 3. Th 1 y0li0iNTCTOR shall be thoroughly familiar with permit conditions, especi. he turbidity criteria for Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) described in the S to permit and variance. 1.2 Bid Method The lowest price responsive bid with the quickest substantiated schedule will be awarded the project's contract. The COUNTY may scope manage this project to keep within budget, if needed. The pre-bid information questionnaire must be completely filled out upon submission of your bid or your bid may not be considered. A bidder shall submit CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 4 of 31 their bid on the Bid Form and Proposal furnished by the COUNTY. All unit prices and lump sums shall include all expenses, overhead, profit and any other costs necessary for completing the Work. A bid without a specific method and schedule may be rejected as unresponsive. If the CONTRACTOR's schedule indicated completion by April 30, and the work is not completed by that date, the CONTRACTOR will pay for remobilization to complete the project after sea turtle nesting season if Work cannot be completed during sea turtle nesting season. 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT. 'P' Collier County, Florida will conduct dredging of Wiggins P T a he �, ct will be administered and managed by Collier County Coastal Zone Managem� nffce. - A _erm ENGINEER as used in these Technical Specifications will mean the Director r,pr'Inspecto nn this office or the Be project engineer with CB&I Coastal Planning & En ring, Inc. (CB&I). €t project team will be described at the pre-construction meeting. a ; 3, d ��' , ,' 3.0 ORDER OF WORK AND PROJECT SCHEDtLE. As part of the bid package, the CON !,,%; C.TOR shall provide; an order of work outline and project schedule to the ENGINEER and t'i`' , TY The pr��a ' ,hedule shall indicate, at a minimum, how the Work will be accomplic �Gr es ',ex,t slete dredg1t 1 in the quickest time. The CONTRACTOR should consider the advantages o R incorporates moves between dredge areas to avoid or m.'. _ potential w :t ' or turb+ ,, caused delays. F 1y tig t,0€I,!N WI °,,,1 INS PASS TERM DREDGING 1.0 WORK. . , The WO, ' consist completing Wiggins Pass interim dredging with disposal of dredge mates, �,. the ebb shoal�6 EZ ,•sal Ar " ):or the flood shoal disposal Area(B) as selected by the CONT OR. Althoug 0 .e order;p disposal is at the CONTRACTOR'S selection, Disposal Area 13 is to be used to its ma mum capacity. The scope of work is listed below. The COUNTY expects constra'i'n •n to beginmediately after the Notice to Proceed. 1.1. The a-consists of furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and perfor all tasks necessary for completing the maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass with placement of the material at the ebb shoal disposal Area (A) and the flood shoal disposal Area (B). The order of disposal is at the CONTRACTOR'S selection and Disposal Area B is to be used to its maximum capacity. The dredging consists of the removal of approximately 9,400 cy of beach compatible material from three dredging areas. Material will be dredged from the ebb shoal, the flood channel and the south channel at Wiggins Pass. Pay quantities will be based on pre- and post-dredge surveys as described under TS 9.0. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 5of31 1.2 The maximum pay volume shall be the bid volume unless modified by change order. This volume is measured above the cut shown in the plans without tolerance. The bid values do not include the over dredge volume and Collier County will not pay for over dredge quantities. The estimated dredge volumes for the base bid and the bid alternatives bid are summarized below in Table 1. All material should be placed within the identified disposal areas as shown on the plans and summarized in Table 2. The dredge values below do not include the 1 foot over dredge !,e "Gee and Collier County will not pay for over dredge quantities. k The CONTRACTOR at its own expense will utilize a r'", -ssional surveyor for all �6 construction surveys. Dredge and fill volumes are ba@'� '� on the August 2014 survey and will be adjusted at the time O ostrLiction usi : e pre-construction survey results. The ENGINEER will rview the pre-construe survey data and update the disposal capacity of Disposal Area B, to maximize4posal in this area. TABLE 1 Base Bid V ti 1mum y _ ,,p'',r-' Cut �, ,th Dredge Dredge Area to to F " Permitted Cut Volume (CY) ( 111 Depth (FT)* ( ) 1 2+00 7' '. d' . _ 8 0 1 —12.0 4,200 ,,-----,--. . r s � 2 MC 29 to C,,3.( -7.4 -7.4 to -7.5 1,500 I to 3 2+ to C 7t� -7.0 -7.7 to-8.4 3,700 ` 244-.. t, 9,400 Bid Alternatives Cut Depth Maximum Additional Dredge Area Stations (FT) Permitted Cut Dredge Depth (FT)* Volume (CY) 1 2+00 to 7+00 -12.0 -12.0 12,800 3E** -2+00 to C-7 -7.0 -7.7 to-8.4 3,200 *There is a one foot over dredge tolerance below the cut depth. **Dredge area 3E is dredge area 3 extended to the northern limit of the permitted channel. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 6 of 31 TABLE 2 2015 Disposal Areas Maximum Estimated Disposal Area Stations Permitted Fill Elevation (FT) Capacity (CY) A 3+00 to 8+00 -2.28 (MLLW) ,41M- 0,Q0 B* C-7 to C-11 -2.28 (MLLW),,b; ' 3,800 *Disposal Area B capacity will be updated based on the.. contractor's pre-construction survey.p 1.3 This Work must be completed in aosArdance with the Plans i.f.„1,„!endix D) and these specifications within the CQ11 . ime aSfeecified in the As," act and in strict compliance with all regulatory mil authorizations include an FDEP Consolidated Joint Coastal Pe it and Sovereign Submerged Lands Authorization No. 01425.,;-008-JC and Van A , ,No. 0142538-013-BV, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineer' I11:,', 1„it No SAJ 20U v 1, which are attached to and part of these specifications visa e'x C. Quic tiletion of the project is of the essence, since County p� icy ';'"i'.7:14,2._allow , edging after the start of sea turtle nesting season on May 1kiTh -er ,tl%tot allow dry beach construction s � during sea 11„a!I' j , Ming season r�t �'. 1.4 The al,�js4 ent us 1, 1• remove sed' ent from the channel may include a dredge, a land or's , ,a mo ed backhoe ocavator or other equipment as determined a b the CO I�,i 4�f u �;-�3yk,�'�i ;I�RACTOR is responsible for proposing the '` s�-pt an. Il mr eloping"±i y uction methods to handle waves and currents typica ® outhweb 4):iorida flood and ebb shoal environments, in an effective and safe manii 2.0 A eh w, S LIMITA t NS. ia- 2.1 1 s Passproject area is accessible by water from the Gulf of Mexico. The wate " rou h Wiggins Pass is variable due to constantly changing shoal g gg Y g g condito ` and is controlled by depth over the bar shown on the Plans. CONTRACTOR is responsible for determining the adequacy of water depth for access by floating equipment. 2.2 Ramps to launch small boats are located on the Cocohatchee River in Collier County and Cocohatchee River Park at Vanderbilt Drive and Wiggins Pass Road. The use of these ramps can be coordinated at the pre-construction meeting. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 7 of 31 2.3 Limited access through Barefoot Beach Park is allowed for access to the sand adjacent to Disposal Area B and Dredge Area 3. No equipment is allowed on the beach during sea turtle nesting season. 3.0 ORDER OF WORK AND METHODS. 3.1 To the greatest extent possible, the CONTRACTOR shall perform the Work 24 hours per day, 7 days a week. The CONTRACTOR shall notify the ENGINEER if weather conditions or mechanical problems do not allow Work to be conducted 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Mechanical dredgiragline), if utilized, is limited to daylight hours. +- 3.2 The order of Work and methods will remain the discretion of the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall `dredge .,, I located within the ebb shoal, Area 2 within the south channel'°andMArea 3 it i=�t ,.e flood shoal. The order in which these areas are dredge an be determined by t4 11,1,INTRACTOR. During construction the dredge„„g it may'''I e excavated ' r, =-' ently as determined by the CONTRACTOR •�:`-.s wi waves, current nd turbidity. Working in two areas at once may be antageous in responding to weather conditions or turbidity restrictions. At the completion of the project, the dredge areas must be excavated 11: •letely according,, ' ,,,the design. Dredged material shall be placed in the ebbs . spapsal Area(A)' r,T hhe flood shoal disposal Area (B) as selected by the CON A OTQR. At the completion of the project, placement of fill in Disposal Area 13 js tai, d3aximized. Any work requiring dry beach opera R hall be placed in the schedule. 3.3 Const 0;,ion Meta#`t,• .. The CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for all construck`T,"1 _ eans,'!a ethods, proce', s, and techniques to complete the Work in compliance t • tort' authorizations, Plans, and these specifications a.. :a . _ ' f the 'fence • ." action as detailed in the Order of Work above. • 8 a to ng c•i15w ction method is provided for information and is largely the , r descripti• ; ed fo .70 udif luting. `:`— The order of':Aiment removal from dredge Areas 1, 2 and 3 shall be at the ^_cretion of t".CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR can choose to dredge one _ ,, r ahem.-- between the dredge areas. The CONTRACTOR may choose to dre• `+. .re Wunder calm weather conditions and transition to dredge Areas 2 and 3 un•l' 1la�gher wave conditions. The CONTRACTOR must have completed dredgin_ in all three areas in order for work to be deemed complete. Table 1 presents the dredge depths and volumes for the base bid and the bid alternatives. The bid alternatives represent the volume to be removed if the COUNTY has sufficient funding for the additional dredging. There is a one foot over dredge allowance for all three dredge areas. The COUNTY will not pay for over dredge material. Material may be placed in one of two disposal areas. The ebb shoal disposal Area (A) located north of Wiggins Pass channel and the flood shoal disposal Area (B) located to the north of the inlet channel. Material must be placed within the CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 8 of 31 boundaries identified on the plans. The order of placement of dredged material will be at the discretion of the CONTRACTOR, yet this does not take away from the objective of maximizing the fill in Disposal Area B by the completion of the project. The flood shoal and ebb shoal disposal areas will have a maximum fill elevation of -2.28 feet NAVD (MLLW), to mimic the existing shoal. It is expected that the dredged sand will occupy a larger volume when placed in the flood shoal disposal area, but is expected to settle with time, which can be addressed with future dredged material. In the interim, overfilling the flood shoal disposal area by a few tenths of a foot will mitigate for the expected settlement. Turbidity curtains will be used to protect the small seagtass patch and mangroves adjacent and north of the flood shoal disposal area. Rock and rubble substrate exists under the permitted a,,el depths on either side of the proposed channel and will remain untouched an. $±tinue to provide the historic lateral stability. This will maintain maigrafillithe channel ity by fixing the channel between the major rock subspits, which occurs alrea4}}F he rock cannot be removed by dredging, but has been ireviously dredged using :,:, line type excavator. The CONTRACTOR may selr`c Lithe manner in which sediment is removed from the three +_ ' a areas. Some sB •ested methods are; hydraulic e � _ Y dredge, backhoe from h barC7.474is,.ased backhoe By submitting a bid, the •Ip , I iaE CONTRACTOR certifies h ' ...eq $ Rand meth.. s are safe and effective for operations in Southwest Florix ebb a d •.1 conditions. If a barge is used, barge over 4./k,„14,..._. d drainage i he con x to comply with the turbidity € �1 E. kuF- � � standard �� vtanding Flo a Waters (OFW). tl If neces .' o co jl ete the work, CONTRACTOR may temporarily remove navigation m ke ,pis required to reinstall the marker at the end of .: .strucction ai G'i' CO �R'S expense. 4.0 NOTICE TO MINERS 4.1! CONTRACTOR shall' be responsible for notifying the U.S. Coast Guard in sufficient time*to allow for publication of a Local Notice to Mariners for this project 4.2 Tempts °bredging Aids: The CONTRACTOR shall contact the U.S. Coast Guard regarding requirements for permits for all temporary buoys or dredging aid markers to be placed in the water prior to installation. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for obtaining all approvals required by the Coast Guard. CONTRACTOR shall provide ENGINEER with a copy of the Coast Guard approval. Dredging aid markers and lights shall not be colored or placed in a manner that they will obstruct or be confused with navigation aids. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"*New Business 9 of 31 5.0 SOIL CONDITIONS. 5.1 If required, all fill material placed in the nearshore region shall be sand that is similar to that already existing at the beach site in both coloration and grain size distribution. All such fill material shall be free of construction debris, rocks, or other foreign matter and shall not contain, on average, greater than 10% fines(i.e., silt and clay) (passing the #200 sieve) and shall be free of coarse gravel or cobbles, as described in the State permits. 5.2 All sandy, shelly or shell material in the flood shoal with than 5% silt will be placed in the flood shoal disposal Area B. Shelly material is natural to the flood shoal, and is essential for stability of the n-..,r4 o Bated flood shoal. The CONTRACTOR will place a layer of the co shel , ;. .nd, if available, on top of the completed flood shoal disposal area. a -r-ems = ''Itft_ 5.3 The CONTRACTOR shall dispose'"P of all materials n- r_4meeting the specifications for beach or nearshore,placement in an approv a 0, hore or upland disposal site or avoid 'such,materfa 4alter consultation with the ENGINEER and COUNTY. 5.4 See Appendix B for the S ::9;0.....roved QA/QC p for sediment quality. 5.5 The ebb channel and portions o.'' = •od chann l 'has been dredged multiple times since 1984. All areas pr osed ri ti a •._.have been dredged previously. 6.0 EXCAVATIO "f• 6.1 The Work�covered'h this section consists of furnishing all labor, materials, and li,t4, 1 equipment, ,�ti • �k E .11 construction stake-out, excavation, and transport of q(v %_ _vated' a ' ial . '4a is designated to be excavated to the designated 8 1, W - •fspO -as. -0,t, , 6€.. , Historical .cts: luring the excavation process, should the CONTRACTOR ' 1- "y uncover an ii;a,A istorie artifacts of archeological and public interest, the ca®NTRACT1961 shall notify the COUNTY or ENGINEER immediately. RACT °' may then proceed to relocate the dredge/excavator within the appre ' g.�. c Area area so that no additional excavation occurs within 150 feet of the area i ',,,hich the artifacts were uncovered. Any and all artifacts of historic or monetary value are the property of the State of Florida. 6.3 Trash and Debris: The CONTRACTOR shall assume the risk of any down time or expense incurred as the result of any trash or debris becoming lodged in or damaging the dredge/excavator, pipe, or other equipment. 6.4 Floating Pipeline and Navigation: Floating pipelines will be marked and in compliance with U.S. Coast Guard Regulations. CONTRACTOR shall barricade both ends of floating pipelines to positively prevent personnel access. Wiggins CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 10 of 31 Pass is used daily by many boaters in the area, with heavy boat traffic on weekends and holidays. It shall be the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to conduct the excavation in a manner that will allow for continuous use of the inlet by boat traffic with up to a 3 foot draft with a minimum of inconvenience to boaters. This means that the inlet cannot be blocked with pipeline, and during operation it may be necessary to either swing the dredge to the side of the cut to allow passage of boat traffic, and it may be necessary to move the dredge to allow some of the larger vessels to pass. The pipeline shall be submerged to the extent practical. If a barge with an excavator is used, the barge must not block boat traffic. i" 6.5 Misplaced Material: Should the CONTRACTQAW, ring the progress of the Work, lose, dump, throw overboard, sink,;,or mi' p:, e any material, plant, machinery, or appliance, which in the opinion of t e - NGINEER may be dangerous to, or obstruct navigation, ;the CONTRAC FO" , hall recover and remove the same with the utmost I ispatch. The CONT OR shall give immediate notice, with description ra location`of such obstructio,, ,el misplaced materials, to the ENGINEER, and 9' recd ,I ad, shall mark " buoy such obstructions until the same are removed. dl". F.,zi event of refusal, neglect, or delay in compliance with the above requirements,-411, obstructions may be removed by the ENGINEER, and the 6.. .,.•1 pf such remova . be deducted from any money due or to become due to ''1r"4i 3 k TRACTOR‘e'.11 .a.. ' be recovered under the CONTRACTOR's bond. 'E `iii. tr 6.6 Positioning o Dredge and'', Monitoring of Dredging Operations: The CONTRA, `•� zli ..redge shalt equipped with an electronic positioning syste F apable h, positioning'the dredge accuracies equal to +/-3.0 feet horizon uw _.ad +/-01:0,06 feet vertical:IliN positioning system shall be established, operated, a °' 1 a 1 ! • the CONTRACTOR during the entire period of the , ' The . :: .ning ' st all be used to precisely locate the dredge and t e .'A gym• of t4 3 edge's excavation device and shall be capable of displaying and reco �� . the • ; 4 •e' Alb s location in an acceptable coordinate system which can 41,, be related ., .•r' is dir.'.;:."- based on, the Florida State Plane Coordinate System, i ,East Zone, Faa, h American Datum of 1983 (FL-EAST, NAVD 88, NAD83). Navigation chi chlt el control, and shore station control, if required, will be provided to to CONT a:`'CTOR in the same Florida State Plane Coordinate System prior to the umi cncement of work (Appendix E). This applies for other types of excavation equipment using similar tracking equipment. Mechanical dredging positioning methods will be coordinated with the COUNTY and ENGINEER. The CONTRACTOR shall propose the method of tracking j mechanical dredging under question B in the questionnaire as part of the bidding process. The explanation shall describe the equipment and the method for determining location of the mechanical dredge equipment to meet FDEP's intent, described in the above paragraph. 6.6.1 The CONTRACTOR's Daily Quality Control Report (Appendix A) provided to the ENGINEER shall include plots of the previous day's CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 11 of 31 dredge locations showing the channel limits. The numbered position fixes on the daily printout and plots shall not exceed two (2) minute intervals. The location on the dredge of the master antenna and the distance and direction from the master antenna to the dredge's excavation device shall be reported in the Daily Quality Control Report. 6.6.2 The coordinates of the position fixes and NAVD depth of cut (X,Y,Z) for the dredge's excavation device, and the date, time, and location on the dredge of the master antenna each day, shall be also submitted to the ENGINEER in ASCII format on a CD-ROM.=with the Daily Contractor Quality Control Reports or sent to the County Inspector and the ENGINEER by e-mail care of Tara Brenner*Xara.Brenner @cbi.com. 6.7 CONTRACTOR's Daily Quality Control Report Thy€., ONTRACTOR shall submit a Daily Quality Control Report ;The`Daily Quali" .` entrol Report with attachments shall include: Y �x • Hours of operation including a red_' �=or excavation s; rt times, stop times, and description of the reasp {r stoppage; • The beginning and ending position', of the dredge or excavator and location of s.� .. nt placement, " • An estimate of the ncu® ,„ ds of sand dreo, • All equipment anelpaterrit nthe job site including the dredge, tug boats, barges, excav r, e inn. t of pipeline in service, tractors, g p � . p�p number ? personnel o Ole job site, • Weath" ,u .:.ditions; • „ *Manatee si' tings: • e p , oning data asdescribed in Paragraph 6.6 above; I�,1 3 r • Sed l 1_ sampi1 abed in Paragraph 7.6 and the QA/QC plan; ..4":40.1•4:0. he r' �w 4 of tur id monitoring as described under TS-8.2 below 3o j, a m of a.e E sampling locations; �, , • from: ,“: iiregulatory or government agencies; and 0' { • An tructions received from regulatory agencies or ENGINEER. r 3 � '1 e Daily Qua ity Control Report shall be submitted by 12 noon on the day followj,ng the day for which the activity is being reported. Mobilization, progress and/o-rIgpkpayment to the Contractor shall be withheld until all of the required CONTRCTOR's Daily Quality Control Reports have been submitted to the ENGINEER. The preferred method of submittal is by e-mail. Collier County or the ENGINEER reserves the right to stop construction if the CONTRACTOR's Daily Quality Control Report is overdue. 6.8 An acceptance section will be the area between two channel cross-sections. An acceptance section will not be eligible for payment until it is excavated to the design cut depth shown in the plans. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 12 of 31 7.0 EXCAVATED MATERIAL DISPOSAL. 7.1 The Work covered by this section consists of furnishing all labor, materials and equipment and performing all tasks necessary for material disposal within the ebb shoal disposal and the flood shoal disposal area within the lines and grades shown on the Plans. 7.2 The CONTRACTOR shall establish the lines and grades of the disposal area as the Work progresses and maintain such control as necessary to insure accurate placement of the fill. Wherever buoys or grade stakes arefused within the limits of fill placement, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for`the removal of same prior to completion of the project. The CONTRACTOR will establish and maintain visible limits of the spoil site for inspection f by the ENGINEER and COUNTY. It is the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to §® +<:,e the location of the discharge as often as necessary to prevent°ccumulation'+;- Iu aterial above the maximum specified grade in the Spoiites. roe 7.3 The results of previous maintenance dr {'among indicate that most ofd e material to be dredged should qualify to be placed in b,.-re'sposal areas. 7.4 The maximum • permiissis .rte evations for eb,"li, d flood shoal disposal sites appear on the plans. They`'` ,, as construe .+ l be no higher than these design elevations. Further �qu w ,-;y for the rgggins Pass spoil sites are described in the Specific iditro t ' F I P Permit. An interim high elevation rs . �aa ssible, subjec'°ottatural p‘ ra project settlement or mechanical leveling 7.5 The C r�E • Cr1:11,11 shall be respe! ;':hle for compliance with the water quality standards �; e+f •ulato permits (see Appendix C for FDEP permit ancesF' 1'r' 71.6'i jM a • I, f The C � 0 CT• ,t a collect one 200 mg sand sample daily from the dredged disc :ge or i`® l area and place the material in a plastic zip lock or n �a,, similar bag. CONTRACTOR shall propose the method of collection to the �� , g p P ; IGINEER air COUNTY for their approval. The bag will be marked with date, time land loca l- of sample. 7.7 The CCTOR shall ensure all vessels and equipment used to transport material to the disposal sites are properly maintained. Material shall be secured within the vessels and shall not be allowed to have substantive leaks while in Outstanding Florida Waters or in route to the disposal site. The materials shall be maintained by the CONTRACTOR until disposal at the site. No discharged water used for dredging unsuitable material shall be discharged into Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW). Discharge activity (pipeline) shall be at least 100 meter outside of OFW or at the offshore disposal area. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 13 of 31 7.8 Fill shall not cover the roots of mangroves adjacent to the flood shoal disposal area. A turbidity barrier will be placed along this edge to protect mangroves and the shallow water course to the north. 8.0 SURVEYS. 8.1 Pre-Construction and Post-Construction Surveys: The CONTRACTOR will conduct a pre-construction and a post-construction survey of the project area and the cost will be paid 40% for completion and acceptance of the pre-construction survey and the remainder on completion and acceptance the post-construction survey. The results of the pre-construction surv-.:,;will be used to update the excavation volume and identify any new regions ^ ing dredging. Generally, the survey cross-sections are at 100 foot inter4v `s, an.* -y will be surveyed not only across the defined navigation channq adjacent to' ' dredge and disposal areas but also extend 300 feet outside of the(dredge and iii" ' sal areas The pre- and post-construction surveys will he limited to selected pro as required to determine payment for this work: 21;3 i.) Stations -°:k- +0 20 to+9+00 +G- to C-12 C-16 . 0-19 Ii h 6 C-29 -. - =1 ii.) Profiles R-15, , 16, 17, 17.5 and 18 A pre- and B.R construction cpo our map um = the entire project area will be developed ':=1,-,-,.,:f,,NTRACTO4 and it will be placed on top of a recent aerial photo , ah with ':E .eled R-mofument and cross-section locations. The ENO Ek can pro+idel a CAD fila 1'i 8.2 A p nce ( Surveys: ."• be eligible for payment under PROGRESS ,; Pd S of CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, the CONTRACTOR shall pe ap an acceptance survey prior to payment for an acceptance section. "' "° 1 :_ The CON' .cTOR shall notify the ENGINEER and the COUNTY at least 24 •V:1.101ours prior tdwnduct ig a survey. At the option of the ENGINEER, the survey ',14#11 be perfo !ed under the observation of the ENGINEER. All surveys shall be rmed in .Qcordance with the paragraphs below: I�7fH 8.2.1 Acceptance surveys shall be scheduled so that field notes and ,computations can be furnished to the ENGINEER. If the ENGINEER's first review of the survey data shows that additional survey work is required in an area to conform to the standards below, the CONTRACTOR shall take additional elevations and/or soundings where the additional survey work is required. The CONTRACTOR shall take elevations and soundings until the ENGINEER deems the survey in such area to be in compliance with these specifications. 8.2.2 Acceptance surveys shall cover, as a minimum, the area surveyed during the pre-construction Survey. The CONTRACTOR shall survey along the CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 14 of 31 same lines surveyed during the pre-construction Survey. The acceptance survey may count as the post-construction survey in consultation with the ENGINEER, if conditions have not changed significantly during construction. 8.2.3 During all acceptance surveys, elevations and soundings shall be taken along each survey line at intervals of no more than 25 feet and at all break points. 8.2.4 Hydrographic survey profiles shall be conduct 4lby the CONTRACTOR using standard electronic positioning ri: hydrographic surveying equipment and techniques. The CONTRA 1 SR shall utilize electronic positioning equipment which has a mnini '°to accuracy of 3 feet horizontal. The CONTRACTOR shall''uti ox' lize a F erspace Model 448 thermal depth sounder recorder equivalent. The ; TRACTOR shall �rlrr use measured tides to correct 44th soundings. 8.2.5 The CONTRACTOR shall ni`.f'o? in c944)- lnete and accurate� field notes, sketches, recordings and corn•' f tos required in establishing the necessary horizontal and vertical con All survey data shall be recorded in accordance ',. .n accepted stand i'`'ts and as approved by the ENGINEER. All t '`�I £�;� , •ata shall be ,:•®e at all times during the progress of the woe h ya or r examination',`'d use by the ENGINEER. Upon request of the ENGII)?*ER;Iri'the CONTRACTOR shall furnish a copy of above survey dap p$11 additiotr- o printed and handwritten survey data spr • • in this paragraph, the CONTRACTOR shall record his survey da '1n the following electronic, ASCII (plain text), comma delimited format: qtr l��., +ltk x~4 4 � a;t� �*,. T -,1110 ik„ . C.;� Col.-2 Col.-3 Col.-4 ng (fe Northing(feet), Elevation (feet), CL Station or ,tie . E + Profile Line The casting and northing values must be referenced to the Florida State folane Coordinate System, East Zone, and NAD 83. Elevation values must :u_referenced to the vertical datum appearing on the plans. Data referenced to any other horizontal or vertical datum will be rejected by the ENGINEER and returned to the CONTRACTOR for revision. Data must be in ASCII (plain text), comma delimited format. Data submitted in any other electronic format will be rejected by the ENGINEER and returned to the CONTRACTOR for revision. Data shall be submitted to ENGINEER on CD-ROM or e-mailed to the ENGINEER care of: CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 15 of 31 Tara Brenner CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. Tara.Brenner @cbi.com The CONTRACTOR shall not be paid for excavation without submission of survey data for the acceptance section from which the material was excavated. 8.2.6 The data collected by the surveys shall be reviewed, signed, and sealed by a Professional Surveyor and Mapper (PSM) registered in the State of Florida,to FDEP standards. a F#1f14»3 8.3 The ENGINEER and Collier County reserve , right t make such surveys as necessary for verification of surveys made icy the CONT CTOR. 8.4 In addition to the above requireme , the CONTRACTOR Is yl compute the amount of fill removed based on o 'l$ :e-construction and the Ci „! '.ACTOR'S acceptance surveys using the average ±i rea r et pd. The ENG k` ER reserves the right to independently estimate the amo t-ef material removed from the new channel based on the Pre-Construction Sure•.. e CONTRACTOR's acceptance surveys, or any before .i. ® ,_ after- constru.i ” surveys performed by the ENGINEER or Collier CouY4''`" 's,i_-re cross-sect"�o •verlap each other or where large curves exist in the ch° one '' stn c�i juents to pensation will be made to eliminate or avoid double counting r t ncom cct for geometry. This will be a topic at the ® , construction rliting. tftlIffere are substantial conflicts or difference •e n en the CON RACTOR's' estimate and the ENGINEER's estimatltrhle amounpaid to the CONTRACTOR by the Owner shall be based on p Y the ENINII.ER's e"amate. , k fi' 8.5 �, ses, p. ,qi,.nt s . -i t rued by the paragraphs below: "Overdepth and _NA fSf I J�.x_ i•e N s " an s I L: asurement and Payment". Paper plots of the survey profiles ,e P' along wit ,of puta kl fkys all be furnished to the ENGINEER. 8.r ift 6 Overde•th a i4'1,-,Side o•es: Overdepth dredging is NOT permitted under the 2 ;urrent permit. in some areas, and is noted on the plans where it applies. The sICTRACT61. shall take care to avoid dredging beyond the designated ove sth appearing in the plans. Material taken from beyond the designated overde !' . appearing in the plans: (a) will be considered a violation of the permits, (b) will be deducted from the total amount dredged as excessive dredging, and (c) will not be paid for. Material actually removed within the limits shown on the plans, leaving final side-slopes no flatter than 1 vertical to 4 horizontal for Wiggins Pass will be paid for, whether accomplished by dredging the original position or the space below the pay slope plane and allowing up slope materials to fall into the cut. If any material is removed from below the designated overdepth, or outside of the CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 16 of 31 indicated side-slopes, the volume of such material will be deducted from the amount paid to the CONTRACTOR. The maximum pay volume is the amount shown on the bid form, although overdepth tolerance is provided. Overdepth is not part of the bid volume and will not be paid for by the COUNTY. 8.7 Measurement and Payment: The total volume of all material removed and to be paid for under this contract for the bid item "Dredging and Disposal" will be measured by the cubic yards removed from the navigation channels, by computing the volume between the bottom surfaces as, shown by the Pre- Construction Survey and the bottom surface as sho vn by the CONTRACTOR's acceptance surveys. Volumes shall be calculattedAsing the average end-area method with adjustments for channel geometry=yand o , p. The calculations will exclude any volume of material. (a) removed from beyond the limits o,f,t'he side-slopes, ";_ (b) removed from below the allow esign depth, IF*' (c) misplaced, or; removed from areas not surveyed by 1� 1TRACTOR. All pay quantities shall b LL's ermined based of ,e pre-construction surveys and the post-construction surve �, ": cted by the C,ii TRACTOR, ENGINEER, or Collier County. 4t4},.;. ,�. 8.8 The maximu ,pay volume is ,the amount lshown on the bid form, unless modified,.by c ez order. Acceptance will be based on full dredging of the � cross-see won do %n . the 2015 all depth. If changes to the cross-sections are needed to ._tch bi a olume to current conditions, they will be made at the pre- construction,etkn 9.0 MOBILIZA: oa A 11'�1, MOBILIZATION. r 9.1 _ All costs coo_ ected xi in the mobilization and demobilization of all the CONTRAC7` „R's plant and equipment, including dredge plant, excavator, barge —and equipmen, f used, will be paid for at the contract lump sum price for this i'I Sixty percent (60%) of the lump sum price will be paid to the CO Q C,IOR after commencement of dredging and disposal of a quantity of, at mifirii .'s, five hundred (500) cubic yards of material. The CONTRACTOR's survey_ 'ecords will be used to demonstrate the volume placed and the ENGINEER, at his/her discretion, may verify the survey results. 9.2 The remaining forty percent (40%) will be included in the final payment for Work under this Contract. In the event the ENGINEER considers that the amount in this item, which represents mobilization, does not bear a reasonable relation to the cost of the Work in this contract, the ENGINEER may require the CONTRACTOR to produce cost data to justify this portion of the bid. Failure to justify such price to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER will result in payment of actual mobilization costs, as determined by the ENGINEER at the completion of CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 17 of 31 mobilization, and payment of the remainder of this item in the final payment under this Contract. III. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1.0. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 1.1 For the purpose of this specification, environmental protection is defined as the retention of the environment in its natural state to te;- xtent possible during project construction and to enhance the natural ap.=,trance in its final condition. Environmental protection requires consideration 6 „,air, water, and land, and involves noise, solid waste management as sll as e a pollutants. In order to prevent any environmental pollution arising fr' the co ` 1 ction activities in the performance of this Contract, the CON 'RAc'OR and their; bcontractors shall comply with all applicable FederO State and local la i: 4.-4;', d regulations concerning environmental pollution trol and abatement. Co 4'' Aee with the provisions of this section by the Sub' actors?' ill be the respo ` iibility of the CONTRACTOR. "k ta ;a 1.2 The CONTRACTOR mush# e familiar with p At conditions for Wiggins Pass dredging. Not all permit ' n 'uns are explicitly . toted within the Technical Specifications, but can be found the permits I'd�'� ppendix C. The full set of State permits is available online 't^::_ ftd//ftp.dep.state.fl.us/pub/ENV- PRMT/collie �,:. ,ed/0142538 Vi d " ins Pas' .intenance Dred•in./008- JC%20an� o � '� l:V/I inal%2 .Order/ 1.3 All envtro ' ental Monitoring cos shall be included with mobilization costs, �. except turb � h§€i '2,f1,-wa o!, , 1.4r Turild w `a.� The CONTRACTOR's independent third party monitor, familiar �� with ch yexcaviitio techniques and turbidity monitoring, shall conduct all ,a,��, turbidity rimiurement This individual shall have the authority to alter X37,construction techniques or shut down the dredging, excavation or disposal if turbidity levels exceed the compliance standards established in the F s EP permit and variances. The names and qualifications of those individuals perk24,ng Jltese functions along with 24-hour contact information shall be submi r __,:to the ENGINEER before the pre-construction meeting. The CONTRACTOR shall provide transportation to the monitoring locations for sampling and testing as well as for the ENGINEER and for agency staff as may be requested at any time during construction. The turbidity monitoring program contains requirements to deal with Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) and extra measurements important to the Wiggins Pass Navigation Program. The CONTRACTOR should schedule and plan excavation to minimize turbidity. 1.4.1 The CONTRACTOR shall provide information on the location of the excavation and disposal as needed to complete the monitoring reports to the FDEP. It is the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to conduct the CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 18 of 31 excavation activities so that the project remains in compliance with the FDEP water quality standards with regard to turbidity. 1.4.2 Turbidity is to be measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTUs). Outside of Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW), turbidity of more than 29 NTUs above background at the edge of the mixing zone is a violation of State Water Quality Standards. Inside of Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW), turbidity of more than 10 NTUs (see State permit for details) above background at the edge of the mixing zone is a violation of permit conditions. The mixing zone in the OFW is ,On, unless shortened by other criteria. Turbidity is to be analyzed o,,,, `te as soon as possible after collection. The OFW are shown on the pl , 1.4.3 Frequency: The background and monitoring sta-.l shall be sampled at the dredge site, disposal site(s), and gat other sites atx a ±uencies described in the State permit. At leas, one set of samples sh ,•,e taken on an incoming tide each day. ry : s�` 6 locations: Samples shad kr .ken at the locations shown within the p-:i ' {and the specified di .nces. Daily report will be provided to the CO V and ENGINEER. 1.4.4 Weekly summaries ne,.11 monitoring • 11• all be submitted to the FDEP South District Of ii' ' � yers), the '4 TY and the ENGINEER within one week o ana ' docume''':. containing the following information: (1) per°m?t nu ne n`-y ^k, s_ sand times of sampling and anal , 3) a statem escribrn.il ;..""e methods used in collection, hate r age and aniysis of the'' samples; (4) a map indicating the sap p I ing Iodations; and (5)1a statement by the individual responsible for implementation of the sampling program concerning the authenticity, precis on, J � 'etectiou and accuracy of the data. The ENGINEER copy sha, h e, # py X�� e pro �e�+�tte day prior to the State copy. 1.4.5 The compliian ., ocations shall be considered the limits of the temporary mixiwzone s°'`urbidity allowed during construction. If monitoring { s reveali rbidi levels greater than stated permit conditions in a visible turbidi plume or near a sea grass bed, the CONTRACTOR shall cease immedia el construction activities and shall not resume until corrective pS9P k ea (es have been taken and turbidity has returned to acceptable levels. "uu.•idition, the CONTRACTOR shall notify Collier County immediately or on the morning of the following work day if it occurs after normal work hours. 1.5 Hardbottom Communities 1.5.1 Hardbottom communities exist offshore of Collier County, primarily offshore of Delnor Wiggins State Park. The CONTRACTOR shall avoid contact with any and all hardbottom communities which are to be protected during performance of the Work and in mobilization and demobilization to and from the project site. The Plans reflect the location CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 19 of 31 of hardbottom in the general project area for the convenience of the CONTRACTOR. However, the CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT depend solely on the mapped hardbottom shown on the Plans. It will be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to utilize any other means to ensure that there are no hardbottom formations where the CONTRACTOR elects to place pipes, spuds, anchors, cables, drag arms or any other objects on the bottom. The CONTRACTOR shall use all means necessary to prevent impacts to the hardbottom. It will be solely the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to avoid all hardbottom formations and hardbottom biological communities. ;, N 1.5.2 ENCROACHMENT ON, OR CONTACTh.WITH, HARDBOTTOM COMMUNITIES BY ANCHORS, CABLES, P1l'I S, SPUDS, DRAG ARMS, CUTTERHEAD OR ANY OTHER DODGE EQUIPMENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED The CONTRACTOR Aiit,It take note that the State of Florida has levied fines"to dredge contractors have damaged protected hardbottom co s p; I ities. "The CONTRAC _a ' 0, shall be responsible for any and all fin f le '" p y � g rE,;eXpenses, or har•'Y6ttom repairs or mitigation requirements me ; nay the CONTRACTOR, Collier County, and the ENGINEER in the ;y;;nt that the CONTRACTOR has damaged hardbotte e, .mmunities in th ,s 6 , ect area. 3,,Its ,,4. -5c 1.5.3 At no time shall the CO s, •R be pe s rH ed to lay cables or pipe or any other object on any hardbs o r nukes, or within 75 feet of the hardbo m resources. �Ad t'ionallyy,r�' `Fes transporting sediment to the dispo`s `t Ni-• shall be maintained without leaks to avoid spreading .iment o' r the bottom''.l'Any leaks shall be promptly repaired before p s . ng o!erations may -continue. The CONTRACTOR shall also exe ' w.` c '6.`,11t:e •.eratmg all vessels in shallow water. s 3 [W_.r- SG 4„, a._.. AID CO ,i,, CTOR shall make every effort to avoid the placement of e on .g n. hardbottom. Measures shall be taken to adequately ' q y b p X63. r r.. - .E r ��r e ,�- pre :. damag„ -• hardbottom by movement of the pipeline. It is the +rl CON ,• CTOR's responsibility to ensure that the pipeline is not placed , on hardbottom areas. 1.5.5''4t Mobilization, demobilization and transport to, and from the disposal areas will he controlled by the CONTRACTOR to avoid contact with any and all hardbottom formations. AVOIDANCE OF DAMAGE TO HARDBOTTOMS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 1.5.6 No cables, equipment or other objects shall hang over the side of the dredge, any barges or tugs, or any other vessels, floating pipelines, pontoons or floating equipment. There shall be no anchoring of the dredge or any attendant equipment (vessels, barges, etc.) outside of the limits of the area to be dredged. These measures are required to avoid hardbottom damage from sagging cables or other objects. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 20 of 31 1.6 Seagrass Protection 1.6.1 Seagrass communities exist near the areas to be dredged. The CONTRACTOR shall avoid contact with any and all seagrass communities. The Plans reflect the location of seagrasses in the general project area inside the inlet for the convenience of the CONTRACTOR. However, the CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT depend solely on the seagrass locations shown on the Plans. It will be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to utilize divers or observers,an or any other means to ensure that there are no seagrasses where •:T CONTRACTOR elects to lid, place pipes, spuds, anchors, cables, drag a, k�or any other objects on the bottom. The CONTRACTOR shall use all s necessary to prevent impacts to the seagrasses. It will,be solely ` �. ,,esponsibility of the CONTRACTOR to avoid all sea ssareas. Manu :. also exist further inside the inlet, and should be 4;yen similar protection: . 1.6.2 ENCROACHMENT ON O` ONT• . WITH, SE•" • SSES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. The � `,x® • C`'OR is responsible to utilize his/her own resources to identify and avoid contact with or damage to seagrass areas. Ar o time shall the 'CONTRACTOR be permitted to excavate, place firt •lig raverse in an'5 ay, or place or store any equipment or material on 'any seagrass resources. Pipeline shall be floated across all areas containing '' g s 4ses�r.The CONTRACTOR shall take note. he State of Flo da has levied fines to contractors who have damn t Crass communities. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible #,for any a i all fines, legal expenses, or repairs or mitigation �fAement .Incurred by the i ONTRACTOR, Collier County, and the EN t�: E®t- � J1,-,_:vent that the CONTRACTOR has damaged seagrass o�{ ., Comm ; .� s ,e °`ftlnF II`P,'?e 9i 1.6 3 l t g sea: is found in the area to be excavated or the disposal areas, 0. cam; • , . the Sty TRACTOR shall inform the ENGINEER, who will direct the CONTRACTOR on whether or how to continue with the excavation. MA o Seagr ;;..es are susceptible to damage caused by turbidity. The . O '' • CTOR shall make every effort to avoid increasing the turbidity 4 _, as a result of the dredging activities, including the provisions in section 8.2, "Turbidity". The CONTRACTOR is to follow all requirements concerning water quality as provided by permits for the project. In the event of a turbidity violation or high turbidity levels as observed by the ENGINEER, Collier County, or agency representatives, the CONTRACTOR shall cease construction and take immediate corrective action. The corrective action shall comply with the project permits as well as the direction of the ENGINEER and Collier County. All turbidity testing and other measures shall be performed by the CONTRACTOR at his or her own expense. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 21 of 31 1.7 Shorebirds 1.7.1 Shorebirds are protected by State and Federal laws; required protection measures are provided in the State permit and FWS BO's. The shorebird monitoring will be a subcontractor of the COUNTY, but the CONTRACTOR has responsibilities. There are three (3) categories of shorebirds addressed in the permits and biological opinions, and the following is provided to clarify their inter-relationship. 1.7.2 Endangered or Threatened Species. Section f the Act and Federal regulation pursuant to section 4(d) of the?Act prohibit the take of endangered or threatened species without [,,,ecial exemption. Take is defined as to harass, harm, pursue, hunt.(shoo$ ound, kill, trap, capture or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such . Ql uct. Harm is further defined by the Service to include significant h. a;i t modification or degradation that results in de a for injury to listed spec € y significantly impairing essential behav'. ,'t .atterns 'ncluding bree• w :; a -eding, or sheltering. Harass is defined ® the S- e.e as intention "'or negligent actions that create the likelihood ' "°'ury to listed species to such an extent as to significantly disrupt norm - behavior patterns which include, H P _�� P but are not limite. . breeding, feedi it or sheltering. Incidental take is defined as take that "r in dental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful activity.# yi,op 1.7.3 The 1,4 kx,.tory Bird Treaty!Act. The MBTA implements various treaties at.' o �7.0A_.ns between fide U.S., Canada, Japan, Mexico, and the former Viet Um. or the protec..n of migratory birds. Under the provisions of g )i BTA, ,`is unlawful "i\.,,. y means or manner to pursue, hunt, take, cap ri Ealdory . migratory bird except as permitted by regulations ssue. 1.a Seri --ti �. ''erm "take" is not defined in the MBTA, but the fSS ice had.-fined it by regulation to mean to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, j6 ' `p p, ca3`k a or collect any migratory bird, or any part, nest or egg or any .E-gratory ,gird covered by the conventions or to attempt those activi iies. 1.7.4 Breed* Shorebirds. For nesting seabirds and shorebirds, breeding is 1 onliirmed by the presence of a scrape, eggs, or young shorebirds, exhibiting breeding behavior, shorebird/seabird chicks, or shorebird/seabird juveniles as outlined in the FSD Breeding Bird Protocol for Shorebirds and Seabirds. Breeding is not considered to be completed until all chicks have fledged. 1.7.5. The remainder of birds are undesignated for the purpose of the permits. There are some actions that can be used to manage shorebirds interference with the project. Normal construction activity may keep shorebirds out of the construction area. MBTA and undesignated shorebirds can be shooed away. The tides are a way to move shorebirds from the construction area. Sand placed in the nearshore zone can avoid shorebird restriction. The CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 22of31 permits and biological opinions are the primary sources of shorebird conditions. 1.8 Prevention of Landscape Defacement. 1.8.1 The CONTRACTOR shall not deface, injure, or destroy dune vegetation, trees or shrubs, nor remove or cut them without the authority of the ENGINEER. Ropes, cables, or guys shall not be fastened to or attached to any existing nearby trees or existing structures. Where the possibility exists that trees may be defaced, bruised, inj =' „or otherwise damaged by the CONTRACTOR's equipment or c7,op; = ions. the CONTRACTOR shall adequately protect such trees. M..,,£ji :. is and markers shall be protected before construction operatio 'om ,'`: --. ,:E p?�iW'- 1.8.2 Restoration of Landscape Daman y trees, bea getation, or other landscape feature scarred or d. ''`aged by the CONT • •R's equipment or operations shall be r 4r ed to a condition sail .'ry to the ENGINEER. Experienced wjd,.s shall F'perform restora ,yn of scarred and damaged trees in an apps • -manner. Trees damaged beyond restoration shall be removed and d''- esed of by CONTRACTOR in a manner approved ENGINEER. Trees ) t are to be removed because of damage shall be replaced .t the CONT',4 : OR's expense by nursery- grown trees of the same s:°rt M�., a species":.:proved by the ENGINEER. The ENGINEER shall'�also a,-..1 3,q e`'and quality of nursery-grown trees �� R 1.8.3 A`y upland areas equired by the CONTRACTOR shall be the reds e, sihiliiiii'' of the CONTRACTOR, and the CONTRACTOR shall obta iie x! 11 n `scar approvals'"for any such areas. 1.9 Post-Construction r,eanup or Obliteration: The CONTRACTOR shall obliterate „ all signs of; onstr 174:6,1 ork areas, waste materials, or any other vestiges of ,_ construction direct rby ENGINEER. The area will be restored to near natural fi conditions. pit �, 1.10 Vri. .e: Spec l measures shall be taken by the CONTRACTOR to prevent bilge puma ;,€ orr e fluent, chemicals, fuels, oils, greases, bituminous materials, waste wash Herbicides and insecticides from entering public waters. 1.11 Disposal: Disposal of any materials, wastes, effluent, trash, garbage, oil, grease, chemicals, etc., in areas adjacent to streams or other waters of the State shall not be permitted. If any waste materials are dumped in unauthorized areas, the CONTRACTOR shall remove the material(s) and restore the area(s) to the original condition. If necessary, contaminated ground shall be excavated, disposed of as directed by ENGINEER, and replaced with suitable fill material, compacted and finished with a suitable and compatible top layer of material and planted as required to reestablish vegetation. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 23of31 1.12 Additional Costs: No separate payment will be made for the prevention, control, or abatement of environmental pollution, and all costs in connection therewith or incidental thereto shall be included in the applicable unit price per cubic yard for dredging. 1.13 Manatees In order to ensure that manatees are not adversely affected by the construction activities as described in these specifications, the State FDEP permit requires the following: 1.13.1 All vessels associated with the project will be 'Mired to operate at "no wake" speeds at all times while in waters ,sere the draft of the vessel provides less than four feet of clearance 'nR 1'e bottom. All vessels shall follow routes of deep water whenever possible: i 1.13.2 The CONTRACTOR shall instruct all `personnassociated with the project of the potential presence of manatees and'illk need to avoid collisions with the manatecs,�uONTRACTOR shall be responsible for all construction personnel to observe vvyater related activities fbr the presence of manatees, and shall implement appropriate precautions to ensure protection of manatees. 1.13.3 CONTRACTOR sh: 't � all construc « < onnel that there are civil and criminal penaltie or "'` �'' ��. harassm .` r killing manatees that are protected under the i Iarm ''i 'N otection Act of 1972, the End. ey: ed Species Act r f,1973, and e Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act. *to) ,M,• CTOR wi4be held responsible for any manatee harmed, { aased, o i'lled as a result of construction of the Project. 1.13.4 Priortitto «®e , --ncement a of construction of the Project, the CON��TO shall struct and display temporary signs concerning 4vpi 1134.1 For :=`els, CONTRACTOR shall place a temporary sign '411}, l<<` measuring at least 8.5" X 11" reading "Manatee Habitat/Idle , k Speed in Construction Area" in a prominent location visible to �� employees operating the vessels. .4.2 In the absence of a vessel, CONTRACTOR shall place a temporary sign at least 2' X 2' reading "Warning: Manatee Habitat" in a location prominently visible to land based, water- related construction crews. 1.13.4.3 CONTRACTOR shall place a second temporary sign at least 8 1/2" X 11" reading "Warning: Manatee Habitat. Operation of any equipment closer than 50 feet to a manatee shall necessitate immediate shutdown of that equipment. Any collision with and/or injury to a manatee shall be reported immediately to the Florida Marine Patrol at (800) DIAL-FMP CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"New Business 24 of 31 or (800) 342-5367". A sign measuring at least 3 ft. by 4 ft. that reads "Caution Manatee Area" will be posted if vessels are associated with the construction, and should be placed visible to the vessel operator. 1.13.5 Siltation barriers, if used, shall be made of material in which manatees cannot become entangled, are properly secured, and are regularly monitored to avoid manatee entrapment. Barriers must not block manatee entry to or exit from essential habitat. Atk 1.13.6 If manatees are seen within 100 y..=j+s of the active daily construction/dredging operation, CONT. elOR shall ensure that all appropriate precautions shall be implemented r(6 ;_nsure protection of the manatee. These precautions shall include the h,ation of all moving equipment no closer than 50 feetofa'manatee. CO ;, ,. CTOR is advised that operation of any equipment closer than 50 feet R manatee shall necessitate immediate shutd,o t t of that equipment. ;E, 1.13.7 CONTRACTOR shall report anyt{' yn with and/or injury to a manatee immediately to the Florida Marine 'ittql (800) DIAL-FMP, or (800) 342- 5367, and to the Fit g 1.e• Bureau of ProN41r.,+ Species Management at (904) 922-4330. "610- 1.14 Marine Turtle Nesting Protection kt.1 1.14.1 To fail ; f turtle monitoring by Collier County, the CONTRACTOR shall proved a copy of their construction schedule and all updates of that sell dule to the Collier County-Turtle Program through the Coastal Zone cut. {...r. 7I,i. f 1.14. 1I'�.l Ap 11,E hrough November 30, all project lighting shall be limited to t edf. ea1 of active construction only and shall be the minimal ligh ? neces'4'A�l' to comply with U.S. Coast Guard and/or OSHA requi ''ents. Stationary lighting on the beach and all lighting on vessels shall be{minimized through reduction, shielding, lowering, and appropriate placement of lights to minimize illumination of the nesting beach and '711110 ate, w 1.14.3 ,Upon locating a dead, injured, or sick endangered or threatened sea turtle specimen, initial notification must be made to Collier County Environmental Services at (239) 890-6486, and then to the FWC at (888) 404-FWCC. Care should be taken in handling sick or injured specimens to ensure effective treatment and care and in handling dead specimens to preserve biological materials in the best possible state for later analysis of cause of death. In conjunction with the care of sick or injured endangered or threatened species or preservation of biological materials from a dead animal, the finder has the responsibility to ensure that evidence intrinsic to the specimen is not unnecessarily disturbed. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 25 of 31 1.14.4 No construction, operation, transportation or storage of equipment or material are authorized for beach placement or operations during marine turtle nesting season (May 1 to October 31). 1.15 Seagrass and hardbottom locations are provided in a map in the Plans. 2.0 FINAL CLEANUP. 2.1 Final clean-up shall include the removal of all the CONTRACTOR's plant and equipment either for disposal or reuse. Plant and equipment to be disposed of shall only be disposed of in a manner and,,,At locations approved by the ENGINEER. , 2.2 Unless otherwise approved in writing 1: "e ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR will not be permitted to abandon aI 'equipment in the diis s . area, pipeline access areas, beach fill areas, or of -i -as adja nt to the Work's . :' e. 3.0 RESTRICTION OF ACCESS BY THE PUBL�'''ee w.t °'`' h 3.1 CONTRACTOR shall er � t such barricades, fences and signs as necessary to prevent public access to t A e uction/dis os� or around the pipeline discharge on the dry beach:C0 co.. . CTOR shat so be responsible to post appropriate warnings within the con 4 air e4 did within the water to prevent pedestrians t g1 wimming wi farm area a :iti,ed by the construction project. It will be t e • y,ir,CTOR's responsibility to insure that the construction project area i -t,,;,, fficient = -sosted and msnitored to prevent swimmers, boaters, and pede'stri LN om i Eery from the c®yr I ction. The disposal area is adjacent to beach uses'1i1;';'- ec °fl€' +F• ing all 4 asons of the year 4.0 P ' -,E 'KS .ESS. The properties on either sii'g gfthe in e are parks. No operations will be conducted in the parks except as,fftows: f # ,,", i is 4.1 A , s to conduct upland surveys. 4.2 No s,k'i y cffl rol instruments will be installed on the State park. 4.3 If land\sWd heavy equipment is needed for excavation of dredge Area 3, the CONT_'`• CTOR will coordinate with the COUNTY for an access route. The amount of equipment will be strictly limited. Dredge Areas 1 and 2 cannot be dredged using land based equipment. No park access is permitted during sea turtle nesting season. CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 26 of 31 ti ?F {1910. APPENDIX J'�� idealli SAMPLE DAILY QUALITY CONTROL REPO WIGGI NS,.PASS rrkj1 1 ,_� f a;rrr`' 11 nl{Ir4t, kl 1 � � K 44 IF3 +� CAC February 23,2015 G2'Uw Business 2731 * -' y t APPENDIX ,, : y QC PLA\ \ � . - . © m. S£g!M£\T\� y �� \ �. . . ~ > d , , \ y. « ; -I --1_,_, & . : r ' yw ±v /y \ \ y:.2 K: '«. 2 .� - Jy _ % « %. � q >. .. \ ^ �� _ \ / < \ 2 . / + '141 ill':y ..\ 1 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 28 of 31• ■ APPENDIX C WIGGINS PASS PERMITS AND``VARIANCES 1,, rr,; fir; r , ,,,, jai f f irli * kl 3 { 9 fP Tf,.. 3sio,'., Flfg.rl u l,s f gll r. 41.'e till.':.,, CAC February 23,2015 G2—New Business 29 of 31 APPEND « ^ WIGGINS PASS MAINTENA �.CE O DGING PL � �. �y . 2. :ay � . y = � « : \ '" : « , y ° \ �� CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2**New Business 30 of 31 APPENDIX 1E r _ '' PHYSICAL MONITORING,PLAN 141, t VN r"II}l II if All: tIII4 1 r» • js (!4111111 j4tt' • CAC February 2,k» GQ—New Business lik„. y > . G °°« /:gip : `a x, .! p 6 « ° A y �--'-< y�, r y ..._ ..* } ,. « �Qys = \ } . ,z 4 ,w _ y 7 m l t. , CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2***New Business 1 of 5 WIGGINS PASS 2015 INTERIM DREDGING PROJECT COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 15- MARCH 2015 COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Collier County Government 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 Design Professional: CB&I Coastal Planning& Engineering,Inc. 2481 N.W.Boca Raton Blvd. Boca Raton,FL 33431 (561)391-8102 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2"'New Business 2 of 5 WIGGINS PASS 2015 INTERIM DREDGING PROJECT BID SCHEDULE Bid No. 15- BASE BID Unit Item Description Unit Quantity Price Total 1 Mobilization & L.S. 1 $ $ Demobilization 2 Dredging to Elevations Indicated and Disposal 1.2a Dredge Area 1 to -8.0' C.Y. 4,200 $ $ 1.2b Dredge Area 2 to-7.4' C.Y. 1,500 $ $ 1.2c Dredge Area 3 to -7.0' C.Y. 3,700 $ $ 3 Turbidity Monitoring by L.S. 1 $ $ Independent Third Party 4 Construction Surveys L.S. 1 $ $ 5 Bond L.S. 1 $ $ SUBTOTAL BASE BID $ BID ALTERNATIVES Unit Item Description Unit Quantity Price Total 6 Dredging to Elevations Indicated and Disposal 6a. Dredge Area 1 to-12.0' C.Y. 12,800 $ $ 6b. Dredge Area 3E to -7.0' C.Y. 3,200 $ $ SUBTOTAL BID ALTERNATIVES $ TOTAL (BASE BID PLUS ALTERNATIVES) $ CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2***New Business 3 of 5 PRE-BID INFORMATION (Attach to Bid Form and include attachments as necessary) A. Describe Bidder's proposed method of completing the Work being bid and a time schedule for implementation. The time to mobilize and complete the work will be considered along with bid price in award;therefore, be specific. B. What type of excavation equipment do you propose for the work? What is the estimated daily production rate for the excavation equipment proposed for the work? What is the estimated duration of the work in days and months? C. What size and type of equipment will you used on this project, to include dredges, scows, boosters, cranes, barges, excavators etc.? What equipment will you purchase or rent for the proposed work? CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2***New Business 4 of 5 D. List key personnel Bidder proposes to use on this project including their qualifications and prior experience. E. List other present commitments including dollar value thereof, name of owner and estimated date of completion. F. Will you sublet any part of this work? If so, give details. G. What is the last dredging project of this nature that you have completed? H. Have you ever failed to complete work awarded to you: If so, where and why? CAC February 23,2015 VIII-2*"New Business 5 of 5 I. List experience with Gulf/open ocean ebb channel (shoal) dredging. J. Name three individuals or corporations for which you have performed work and their contact information as references. The undersigned guarantees the truth and accuracy of all statements and answers made herein. Signature of Bidder By Name Business Address Incorporated under the laws of the State of n r" I Oz O /" •_. rlp _ Dc- 1 O L I`-\ n J +COO) 12 \\\ 2 m' n 1 \■ DADS RG4YARII \\\ \\\\\ S T. O O! n N O a E 5 n m a12. Z� n c?4,c.o.) n � 1 O N) 1-- o 'OZ-Ooo I oDAO° osoz� —oD„o., mT °zoo m N — �0 _._, Z t 0>,D mzm O 0r- ml m C 3j Z N D 1 NZ 2 Z K (-1) TR O n0en O G) Z 0 O =, g- > m �() m x A z -,± m m A Z , I O m n ■—N�— F A a D o O H co O N A oo 0 A 0 v O A I A 1 N OD F. 'A A I (N A X A I I a O m ,, X 1 1 0) IP Or 2 > �A Co J N A I N OO CO I N 0 I N �,. P, N TA,. C71TA1 R Aa .1';. 'y, B,+N+�. -D mDl 1 i w'%f2, ,, '.ib . Nct F,Z mru x.r.-.K.n..D.E.bp TB bp REVISIONS _ _ _ o y ^ a MOONS PASS COl11ER COUNTY,FLORIDA F p% CB&I COASTAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING,INC. H�, V17 2015 INTERIM DREDGES r b R� J COVER SHEET 1/10m .t b* 2481 N.W.BOCA RATON BOULEVARD PN.(561)391.8102 BOCA RATON,FLORIDA 33631 FAX(561)391.9118 to AS NOTED 153693 N., pa p.,s,p., www.CBLcom C.O.A.LA XAD21 C.O.A.LA./2531 .v••••14-0111 n••••I*raw a.... -..,vi•JI.___•_a_.•••• —.....__-..o a.•Ami-a...w A W N 7L z 0 AAmen -1 m l 000 Pi ' KU)ZZ U) mZ(�DD CZOon m z JJM m ZOnmi/) --iw 0m N m 0�m - - 0 cZmm m Mc Z f 2 2 n h C) 2 C) wo n n 2 n C) n 2 A 2 2 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 O'.0 0 2C�R(� FC�'')(['�� (� 0�O_,V ; Z Z Z(n J W W W N N N N N N N N N N FO CD V R 0 2 W N 0 O 2 M -Ow W W W W A W N O UP CO V 0) D A W N -. O CO CD V 0) N A W N O Z m M 0 N r J O N(n Z _1 omtcm 8 o m m 2 0 - N N N -• -• -• N N N N N N N N N N N N N Na N N j N j NJ Na N Na Na N fRC'1I (A(�T p N N O W_ A_ cT IIt j Co ()n 00)1 (n C_n ,,pp 0,p) A - W 0C.l (.l - N N N _ 0)p O O O (fO� 0O 10 m{ i A J V A Ou C) w OD (n W CO O) Ov tp 0) W CO W .- (,.)N ..� (O CO V I ,21 0 — m v J N J O O O O O O N N V N V N V N V N C) -.. T D) CD ?!1 C'1 T W CD 0 W z m C0 0> (0 O O I) ow O O O, 0 pp W .4"C N N O O p CO O pp CD O J V V CS) O (l)O) th t0 A (O A (O m o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 z pp pp [p �p pp Cp 4¢}� (p Qp Cp p3 (rI z z O A> OW0 CW0 Ow0 m Ce m g (mi+ 8 pi 8 (Oit c(�Jt (CX'l1 COn CA (OJ1 COn 8i1 c�8i1 A A 1.. .P �P �A �A.1.+ .`i 5.s.w (5 w w r UP m r 0 1- Ce 4=4 "e'4 �a S" S�' Kt . nw., 8 8 ±'• COO w (`a(.��'(YC�n>1' OVC�A ,C8Op pXp ' ' ' ' mCpp F°a -((�.°li ((`8lt '''i'(p 8 '' w 5011 pvp, 8 z --I C.Nm 0Z W J (nJ 0 . . ... . �a N W (T v 0000 0 (O 40000 000910000000001600 _ _ 0 0 0 �m (n0 000000000,0 0 O 0 Z C D N m mil- ."O O _. _• OO 00 N N N N N N -• -• -• -• .+ -t N m Z' (90 W W N 0) 01 01 0)0) (P C) C3) C) C) C) C) C) C) Cn C) C) 0) O) 0) 0) 0)C9) 0) W O) (A 0)C7 CA CT O m .m 4, G-) W C C O G N f11 (l O O N n n n N n 0 0 Vt 01 Ot (n 0 N 01 C n 01 0 C 0 (1 !1 O 01 N 1 -0 O_O (n_(n_01 ix 0 6 (n (n (n O 01_Cn in 6 (l1:cr (n 0 W Vt in Ln 0 c»0 Ci coo_at Cn in in W in in /\ 0 m vZ m Vl I z O O U) O O 0 .< - - N - N N V N O O (O co Co J J 0) 0 A A w N -• 0 E. C� tp O D 2 (n N 01 CR in Z + A + + 4 O+ p+ qOqk 1C4O pTq p+ +pp�: 4 + + ppi 1p r 6 V 00000 O S 4 0 O 8 0 S p O Z m A z X m 0 -) J J J J p J J J J J V J J J J J J J J 0 m m (OT (8� 9, OJ ()D COD COD 0 0 W W A LoI, (T C) J A m Z r V V .4 .4 .4 J. s.V• VA .V4 V "44 "4 Q 0 (w0 O') (AJ g W S N ,(00 V r-...1 W A ad Z' Z. W e n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N g W 'Xi .Z1 01 W 00 0 Co N J N in O CD A co o W w N O Z m 1--�--1 V V J V (Jp OD CD O O O (O W CO O CO O O "� O O O O O O O O O n 2 I ' 1 ✓ A r` (JO Qf W W+ . ,P) w g..-•.'° P !"o.v ,(071 ,,N) _ S S o 0 8 0 8 S S 8 S o 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 p0 W(.,) Z W z Q (0) 0 CV A N 0 V W 01 A CT ((11ll pppp ppDD ppoo pppp ppoo ppoo pppp //�� lD A O CO J A (D A D fA A A A A A A A A W W co WW co j N N N N to z l J T DD co co co !p co W co co CO CO W (,J W W W W WW W !� {J (.1 0 J J 0 W W (O V O A W CO V 0 N Xa O) CA 8 W 8 W W 8 W W OD 5F W W CD W 8 p W N N N N N N N po 00 OJ OJ N (O m z G 0 O IO y j W N.) N N N'N N.NJ(O((VpD W Ca WW A, N., J O O J J J A f0 (O (O N N O J Z pp 0 0 p CO IS (O t0 1 C O CDO COO 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Cn a N -+ (D C)(a ,(pdpO pap 0 la_,p ((0(Q01. CD (A (n CwCpp N 2 D o 0 0 o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co O o o (p CO C COO V V N A W N O O W CP C) Of A A W F) O O V V J V J - - W -2 -.l y�J -�[[yy V V V V •V N (A 0 N N N N N N N N N N) N t3 N N N N N N tV N N N N N N N N N N N N Na N N N N N N N N N_N N N N N N N N N tJ_IJ_IJ_N N J J V V J J J J J V 01 J V J V V J J O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci > _ > x m m� 99(, m zm 0 P, -0 `� v m D , . d.c D . --i $ < m K r T. (_ — 2 O m m o 0 W D 1 Z m co m m m m m a w nD) D ? O m C-I x 1 2 T v Q -, -1 z ,0 Z D (j;-I00022' C) w p 1 0 (,+ O O „ m „ N P mm oZf 0 $ r P3 m 0yyy, pp D 0 Qh r J J J J J J J J J J J J Z N J m m CO 8 O to V p -' m D -4 -4 V V J J -4 V J -4 -4 J -4 xi m m D O p0 W co CO O N-• �I CO N O A 0 CJt CP() c 5 N tl1 J co 9 -( y 0 -4 A O m O N J CO O w il co z -n 0 O o (n O D Z 0 co J O J CO A (l, on co (.l -, T Z O O N DD A. co Co rn �D (R 0 au 2 (,) O m Z pp D Z N CO -4 O CO N A -A O 0 A (O D .m 2 W J V OO -• W O D7 O Z O N Z N rC7 e A 0 N c) N . N W W (n N CO (n (n T 00 Z O m oz O N N 0) o C W W a N D O 0 CAD O m CO co N N O CO N O N A J C) 0 .wZI C O��1 W N A W O J V N CO 0) f0 A W CO CO m N qm 2) W V 0 m�1I o W Cpap (#2 w Cpap w (CpOOp (p9p CGppap W (J W w (w((}}�� r O1Z :)n� Z W W W W W W W p Wp W W W (WJ OWJ D V ? A A A A W CO `O W3 Ca CO > N 0 Z D (OCOO O O N (ill N (Olt W A A_ W W W N N 1_ _I , A (OCnn W O s.), ??(n CO (n Q (n 44 m m^n (D Z CD N J D 0 O O O N N J J (n N CO CO O W A W N CO D A N A O) J 2 D I g - C)O (p 09 n O O N W O A W N W Z $ Cn A CJ A CO CO J J ? OD 0 A Z -m o O N O Cn CO ? O N J N t0 f0 N N D J W N O N W (n O J W C m 'co A -, COO A N v OW) N - COO -N.+ R• D� ,0 im Z2 2 0 N PMAONS 0 o MIOd14 PASS CQ11FR OOIMTY,Ft. 0A Moms.n� ~F„ N by CB&I COASTAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING,INC. ..■.^TB 2015 5II N ORFD0l9G a1 n .y' 2481 N.W.BOCA RATON BOULEVARD PH.(561)(9)4102 Q CONTROL DATA 1/3o/15 V BOCA RATON,FLORIDA 33431 FAX(561)391-8116 D.D.A.FL 94929- A5 501FD 153993 pi. pp. Maly.i WWW.CBI.rom C.O.A.LA.82531 iPi Z fr- /=.' O I I I O Dp D m C m I W.. ��m n=Z O D O N N N N O O 21 -0 0 0 O � O O O0C -i o m O Ao 00 I-o o 8 0, � � . . � � M � DA c C Z D —I —I X -I m D --II M (7 ,ZIT m O Z Z , Z 0 m -0 O M -o O D 0 0 0 m 0 Z O „ ' o x r z z n m v) v) o D N O co V{m n c/) > 0 c c� o M O nwm� o v 4 1- 1- z mcn CA m K A 0 D D .x07 2 —, cn /j D o a t` o 0 D D N D 0 D .M D D :U m K. No n n n rpTt m 2J 73 T7 m TI D 1n (n T <'o z° o Cr) \ \ nN D N °y m n yU1 O = 77 D 1 , O i 0 ' > ,- .S., . '-----k ,, -_,.,., „„..._ orn ■ j •A !\ \` 0 m— �(n 1 =I D ' 1\• ` 0 7 r r 0 m - - p..* \\,,. \ • m D Z p I \ ..sii.. ...,(_____________I mi � m- TI /' 20 0 Q Z 'I N ``�4 d_` rn r �0 �� as u) 0 = Cc Q 1 i --1 G... � 1 \t_ D g - .p .:... -:. i8 I I l V) i co x FrI V) "T I I >N O m �D I (. Dcn m o PD I O CO rri (4',4 H r- X co m �` 4-/©w / © N o ' -rl 0> -\ I °N �� m ': °-m Vim) 0 ND I , NO M -I Om �\ `f r Op C CO r- ( O \ D r =- V) N \�Z D 4•• �a D o r • /7: • m Z A I •N N. i O -*I /...:' yl --...D,F Pmp,.a er . ..REVISIONS' • ' p H N 0 13 $ MIOGNS PASS COLL3ER COUNTY•FLORDA 'a �'� CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING,INC. < 2015 INTFRM DRIDgNG ac er R�.er t. i $ PROJECT OVERVIEW 20 15 9( •r 2451 N.W.BOCA RATON BOULEVARD PR.(561)391.3102 BOCA RATON,FLORIDA 33431 FAX(561)391.9116 AS 001F0 153593 C.OA.Fl.NU25 _xw PA. O.vgtm www.CBl.c9m C.OA.LA.12531 1,110.1m-em wrimi.M..Yram A X 0 D r- 8 O R z o ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD)I I I W NJ I I W I I NJ I W N O O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O ....O O O O O O I I O O Z°j O j 1 O ) O . •1 1 Z 1 1 1 I 0 0 — r�IOjI . l — . I I D N R4 Z O O A . 1 O 1 O r it -n U) 1 U) 1 V) 13' I I - 1 rn ,t I Z _ 1 2 1 2 of•m � 13 1 VmA 4)1 ^y1 > O _ �n �1 D p _I XI D o G•-i J• Z n. ) ]J^i O }i}°""iI O *ri C') • . it O I` i O RNG•15+09 1 Ei •ij / o1) ! I ' I N a 1 i! + 0 'm . i O / RNG 15+76 0•ITI .' fT1 O IT1 r Z C. \ v It _ - ON 'i m ° \ m 21) \ m . ` c�noc 73 0. v ° a v o �' •A � , z10 �I, , 0 /,,1 m .a s O3 I m ••. Z n-� ° m D ! ° Om H . D . ° a z . �R°F- 1 • I1JI!0 rm� 6'. rIC. .1 I •=m N' ^.0 N 1 A �I�. 01>n o' ° m • N, N G Z 0 0 N O N A _ : NO O, 01 0 O o O 71 G3 m 00 M ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) m21 I m �0 0 0 0 0 mm ° I III ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) 1 I 0 z . 1 O 0 X3 C r 0 O O -. I I I 0 !O Z l �o o v • Q 1 1 °o° I I D- ) m m 1 am I I rr C.• 1 I . m y. ZZ DN . 'III -+ , o. m D • . 1 D� O-f. I 0_. •te �. �C N 8 A C 0 0 -1 D I I 0 o n I } D I D z . ,m Z m . mN I Z o 0 . o 1 Z o o O m 0 n _ m z l n 8 z o A 1 7m S-m � >1 . • vm g_F4-i - y -*I- 0 � 0 1l 0r o �O 2g . f - m ) . . rr- Z 1 rO O Rl I 'U ° t1 Rl O `. m 0 r 6�`°i•x m O o 1 + RNG 15+45 ) + RNG 15+48 I : + ? �� m o N •- I , 00 o— ii • • • G m rn . . . 00 o- 'a D m ° . o m O RNG 16+50 II m ° Eta 7i ' m C 1 $ o ,1 • 2 D m O m ~ D/ m m )• P CO Nm H m . I m W I1 m nl O N" • 1 N . % J• U) 3: m I'T1 0• 1- 1 ONO. p . 1 n� RNG 15+43 ,1 . .4 °o-.-0N. $ k Q_.MN. m _. . 8 1. . 11 j. 2. t . " . • PP Z N °0 RNG is+ 7 !I . t < 1• ; ,XI k 0 iii '''1 0 oo mmo' C) A DZ ED < 0 c)m 3 z2 F1 m n, — s�om�.�ns RMan6 - _ x $y Why P,�ar E COUNTY.FLORIDA ""° iB 6' CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING,INC. t°'^`" 2015 1 I1 I aenv40 ,;,o ••, PROPOSED F 2481 N.W.BOCA RATON BOULEVARD PH.(561)391.6102 SI J P (ROSS SE 11ONS 1/20n5 BOCA RATON,FLORIDA 33431 FAX 1361)391-9116 m R� � ��' C.O.A.FL M028 8A pro 69.846• _ "ww.CaLcan C.O.A.LA.62331 A xo 0 0r o ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVE))I I W N I W N I W N O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O 0 8 I I. M 8 I I, 8 a i I. I 0— 0— I 0 O O 0 _ 1 0 .•I v D O 0 o i DD Z �00 �c .II Do oai DON r 'rlcil DD • ScI N ,c • DD N 8 -m- DD r-vi I Dp m� r _ N 03 A m P 1 N m A I z ° O 164 (Zj ; 111 1 . Il m o - II O m \I XI m o I -0•0 • FD- , r • • I 'r�r M . I 21- M . 1 0 -m r I zI Z o r 1 ° D 2 , D O A y I I OS G O + N• , ys O - m I N O O -p 0 -O . O / + -0 0 . I A l i m 0 p m 0 I • . I1 1 co 1, 0 CO 0 O O Q I• ° N • O Im 8 I p m .0. O)= m °• Z• i � . _ mo re$_ 1 . <. 8_n.� . . . <<. 6. . . . . g m. <I 0 o m m °• M 1 m I m v• CNN � RNG 15+37 I RNG 15+ i RNG 15+V)O 07' Z 3 l ^I m . j . i p. < rn 'I . m m j 1• I 1 o— o— I r � o O I • 1 ..5. O I �.i.c O Z O-( f-E I 1 'f If IT 0 RNG 6+77 P"1" `a RNG 16t71 1 . i P P RNG 16+64 1 "P• P V) r I 'o ). 11 dl o 73 m o ON • 1 aNa a • I aNa m ON 131a M 0 O O g QQ g '�N r0 • C r- 0 01 7 1 < O M Z ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) '1 SA ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) 1 ro 0 w N m m J O o O O o O O O O 8 p o o 'o o 'o °o I • V°o I { -1 g •gy P"P I co � Ac' P I,•me pZ .53 Rte. I ">; ara Dp .I 1.48—/1• z 's N' Ya - �I SQ .I m13 0 rn rON N f,m L�II p oo—. .DI- N o .1i Dr .� I .1 I M. m . 1 z D v > D A . •1■ } O • I o XI ti D 0— o 1 I I . . . � D .�N II 2 E) J O II m rm+ p .77..1 . . SO o-. .� .F.- . . .�. . . . . R O o- . . . �*I j o_ � O 6�.,-�I ZjI RIO ° V j G7 ° �l AC 1 x A m I 1� o r� a i o o m vc i o Z -0 T ° '. I- I r ° N 1 -13 C RNG 4+58 • R1 0—�.�7 . . 'I f'l o—�I A 1• Z D m �� I m m .1 m m I P l�/1 m RNG 5+471 /y< I ,-- I v i.1 ' Rf N r,'w .�C I� I f+l 01 rd. . . . • • • m Iii• O N '`s 2 O- X11. °— • VI is Z N a o �1. o iI. ;II P cn CO I IIL IL.y1 N E c)mA o CO , �e1 I g •1 a 1 ; °o 4, C 71> 5> o °A m 0. z2 £,z F r„ 4.•■■ Ord w RLMSIR6 H N sp MOONS PASS CC11E71 COUNTY.FLORIDA bra Me 7B CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING,INC. now xlmr ORGASM « ,e IPROPOSED DREDGE , t 2481 N.W.BOCA RATON BOULEVARD PH.(561)391-8102 Q -• Z S�ON5 1/20/15 -� BOCA RATON,FLORA 33431 F.(561)3916116 e� NM C.O.A.FL P4028 AS NOIED 163893 W 0. Nap* www.CB/.corn C.OA LA.82531 C, o > r N CI O rrD Z o ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) I I -0 1 I 1 I I -0 1 I 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 to m 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 x 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 O • SIC. O O Aer O•D I - K z rN .'�I I m N f N o. s .•N N O D N O r� I D 00 c, °O A. . . .I. i OO 0• I • I ° m ° PO • J - J II ° 0 J I -n ° V) o V Z C) O • V • j () m0 J s''01I m zf•m Z Z • DI m 0 m 0 ,. m 0 O ° RNG 4+43 r� O RNG 4+48 .I1 ■ rr r0 0 RNG 4+53 .I .( rrS .jl i m •1 , m 0 I1 I II N O A RNG 5+40 ./ 'f I n A : ' I n p� RNG 5+48 �' n VN.'iXl m °o �� I fTl 8 �� m O N.1\. °N. .� IIII ON. 'm0 `II m 0.zC• IO A. I .�.. C.AC I .,. II mmn o � ccDi. o .�.3c EDo -i D m O rN O •m 1 - O °elm O. ' • P • 4 6 . • F 6 . A. ,': . . rl . I�• K y y Y ()Dm 0 0 •• 8 • D.-.1G7 0 0 0 ADD v z O M m n m >°E z E r M Z K r-•° ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) (n N Z CM I I - CM I I I — (N N V C7 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 x, O r- 0 0—In°Z 0 . I I ° I N I I 0 - $ o 2 Z• D o r- . I A O�� m I � . iI . m . < 'I•(nom y . -±-(f -I • I I 0 D-1 • ,II m0 O O O O XI • , I`��II XI (n In N o ri D DD -1 o T •Vi m > i Ay > )11 �0 > 6f rn v . J� m 0v m <� _ D $ �f to-y m 9 DO �m 0 �,I MI x D A D O7 y 0 RNG 4+32 O N o r Q, o �!/ r 9O I, M I _ rr • Z1 m 7 m �' I T O RNG S+Ot i z �� ; • .i, A V m' 'i 013 • m� A R • 10 -1. I .0 I to 0 m Q 0_0.0. 1 m 0-0 OC f . . �?1 0 1 Z t� r 0 j \, r 0 0, 1 1 r 0 .I I•vD rr' • o . '' m °mo r Z D� m y�y 0 vD m D 0. ` I m 1 N vD "'•O Wm v m rl• SI2 • v m �D . v SIC �C 00 OGl CO J •• m( • I _4mS I N mc • mcc13 Oo-V j ii'i• O�y. .�.� p N •OP1, • > 'I. • P . Pp o , '• I�• elm y I Ya 0 ii O �Z °O p 0 m O I C ' C <n Dn 0 o (�RI ¢T D Ft.- m v PoNme.Flee o�YW St Or.. RENSOIS 10 H— r$ 1 MOM p OWEN COUNTY. 'G is iB CB&I COASTAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING,INC. TOIe ellFllll OSmG19 04 M 918.R 2481 N.W.BOCA RATON BOULEVARD PH.15611 3 91-810 2 W P PROPOSED S 1/�5 0<eR BOCA RATON,FLORIDA 33431 FAX 1'+61)301-0116 C.O.A.FL 94636 a AR NOTED 10.189] IIA 0. e...N. www.CBl.eom C.O.A.U.93531 A m 0 > D-. N 0 O Fi z o ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) -i i i i I I I I i I W N CA N CA N 0 O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 m 0 I N I 0 _ f I il O v II Z m . • jr A O 0 VI < y. . 0_ .D 0 . . 0— . . N • - - F 0 O D 0 0 m N O A. M - o o _ . • 0 D m. :I i'I —1 . I D • iI >0• Z 0 / Z �'1 >O Z 73(/I m r0 n.• -"1 ./ 1 .( AL-6. m .�� D0 , I � r z c-,i •l � � m i I m S m o 0 .A rn o 0 0 1•.o � M .5` O m mac' I m r� "m �c I m m .A -0 a• M m a o 0o m D m mac. CN Vl fTl a� I r7* .m 'JC I v r� � << c 0:1'. 8 mN I WI 09 I mom. • O O J 00..._.J .N ..i:E.J J • 0 9 0—m n " , o 1 1 . ii,1 1 1 P. F ,I 1� �N _ _ ; � A O • O O <z 0 00 0 0 r'O m o0 <D mz R. ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) o m I I I — I I I I I I 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Dz 0 I I II 0 0 I I � Z I . () V D N V D N - 1�• OZ C LC ' .Z1D 0.. 1 .�.I 0 PO • • •M CiI 0— { C A• 00 O o . 4 • II II O p 0 Fig • / O r� II II m .A ) ON A 2 = Z iJ q 2 Z • C i I n . i > N n 4. I I C I. Z RNG 4+83 •\ Z RNG 4+90 1■ F; z • :1.\ F; •• I 4'3 M 00— I ' { r °o i r °o—. .0 c . I v D rt I I g 0 NI 9 fl'1 RNG 4+65 -I • m ' m 0 . , m n� - • z II (1, rl .11 - m' 1 D ', NO • I1 o a3m I • �6 II c � -1i• u m1 • i �I ' • g m� $— a,�. . obi Co_ . • J O N ' / 1�I1 9 • Zl . l , 1 I:.1: 1 <p • r1� prAj �B, _Q ^+ b 5� �Ba 0 Z 25 0 m u• 25 p 0 o v 1 m 4. " c I .'I D N Z =n a A�1 -, IT m 2 F Z O3 N Rl.ws 14 orntl uY v.,by REVISIONS Wien p pply II fLglpA b IY CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING,INC. .e,/N es 2 PROPOSED at DRLDVIB 2431 N.W.BOCA BATON BOULEVARD PM.(561)3914102 P 1/20/15 5% eY BOCA RATON.FLORIDA 33431 FA)!(561)391 4116 CROSS SECDONS Yes C.OA FL.92029 AS Np150 16369] ,w 0M,_ 0r"puw www.CB•som C.OA LA.82531 A o C) > r to yFn O 1*1 z o ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) -4 I I I I I I I I I I o 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o A 0 I I Ac 0 I I I ° I I yO . .J rr�C ill Z N O l'e RNG 0+35 � -r. N o RNG 0+52 .? o .if`1 0 n RNG 7+57 �I t n RNG 1+58 �, I n o z o v s ,z 0 i K fy M•p ) o ca.0 z r zz O . r• 0 'm v m ° o: \ 1 n n A XI 0 C n I XI J C r.]c n O m • A mI m• XI M ?A 0) CH • 000. CO A0— c-.s. . .- _E- Z -< 0 Eli 0 • Fig E'- 0 m� P.P P'1. • o .9 99 N l„" N . ru <Z 0 0 00 0 M �Oj O 0 <> m xi -I. mm o, oc >0 c• ELEVATION (FEET NAVD) o o zz 0 N D 0 0 0 0 oc o I I 0 r c ) V) . -1 p- . . . I "CI 13 j N rl x m m 7, v �; ' Z Z D O -0 D Lc O m C z c 1+1 P COm °� s. o. A m �. I w p. -CA CA M n m I �• p y . Z O1 rnZ �_f n a p II I C o ' . •71> . .;� 5> >z o . o 0 M °o 1 m z 2 E,1. mro Ar.m,Ma on.m1 N 9, REWBO6 ,a m u. WORN PASS INTERN COUNTY.��M 1B CB&I COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING,INC. sole MFAII oleovl0 «a ..TB 'I 8.000 SHOAL CHANNEL 201 N.W.BOCA RATON BOULEVARD PH.(56))]91200] Q CP P CROSS SECTIONS j� 6 6N.MV 9F BOLA BATON,FLORB)A 33431 FAXO561)Ft 16 m A9 501FD 16]893 9. o.s Osrptl.i WWm.CBL.eom C.O.A.LA.02531 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FEMA PW 2700 Deobligation Second Appeal Supplement OBJECTIVE: Review FEMA PW 2700 Deobligation Second Appeal Supplement and discuss review timing. CONSIDERATIONS: The second appeal to the deobligation of PW 2700 was submitted to FDEM for distribution to FEMA on October 17, 2014. The second appeal focused on an independent peer review to evaluate lost sand quantities, the quality of FEMA pre-construction survey along with environmental, permitting and other related costs. Hybrid survey was prepared to better reconcile original survey conditions. The sand lost from the evaluation was 130,000 cy's less than the sand that was originally measured. This difference was greater than could reasonably be explained and time constraints prevented a comprehensive analysis of the difference. Subsequent investigation discovered that the third-party peer review has been given and utilized the wrong survey data to perform the analysis. Once the correct data was supplied, a total of 203,345 cy's of deobligated sand was justified at a cost of$6,149,099. Justified and requested deobligation funds are as follows: Additional justified sand $ 6,149,099 Engineering/survey/permit $ 2,506,841 Appeal No.1 Deobligation $ 1,853,755 TOTAL $10,509,695. Expected review meeting in Washington DC with FEMA with an expected discussion within 90 days. FISCAL IMPACT: Recovery of additional funding of$6,149,099 plus $2,506,841 for a total impact of$8,655,940. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: For information only. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Review FEMA PW 2700 Deobligation Second Appeal Supplement and discuss review timing. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachments: Promotional Fund Grant Agreement CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 1 of 8 BAKER, ERNkST B ABBOTT 901 K STREET NW DONELSON SUITE 900 WASHINGTON.D 20001 BEARMAN,CALDWELL PHONE 202 508 3425 &, BERKOWITZ, PC FAX 202 220 22/5 www hakerdc,nelson coin ERNEST 8.ABBOTT OF COUNSEl. Direct Dial: 202 508.3425 FAX:202.720.2225 E•Mail Address:r.jhMvt4,hakrnkt /son January 29, 2015 Alex Amparo Assistant Administrator Recovery Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security 500 C Street NW Washington, DC 20472 Re: Collier County,Florida Second Appeal - PW 2700,Version 6 Beach Restoration Deobligation DR-1609-DR-FL, PA ID 021-99021-00 Dear Mr. Amparo: Please find enclosed one copy of the Engineering Supplement to the Second Appeal for Collier County, FL regarding FEMA's Deobligation of funds for beach restoration work,DR- 1609; PW 2700, Version 6. An electric copy of this filing has been sent via email. We have also sent one copy to the State (FDEM). If you should have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, kgfr---. Ernest B. Abbott ALAtAMA• GEORGIA• FLORIDA• 1,OUI'IANA• TENNE'.SEE• TEXAS• WASHINGTON, D.0 • CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 2 of 8 BAKER, SUI N.ASSAC:Hl,:5FTTS AVE NW j�j�� st!]T'F90i? DONELSON PHONE:202.508.3400 z�,00l PHONE:ci'tr.: BEARMAN,CALDWELL FAX: 202.508-3402_ &. BERKOWITZ, PC www.bakerdonelson.com ERNEST B.ABBO....t. OF COUNSEL Direct Dial: 202.508 3425 FAX:202.220.2225 E-Mail Address s._ta?iC(t;ib,tkrl..ac+n,.',(tl.Mm Alex Amparo Bryan W. Koon, Director Assistant Administrator— Recovery Florida Division of Emergency Federal Emergency Management Management Agency Attn: Evan Rosenberg, Deputy Bureau Department of Homeland Security Chief, Recovery 500 C Street NW 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Washington, DC 20472 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 January 29, 2015 Re: Engineering Supplement to Second Appeal Collier County PW 2700 - Engineered Beach Restoration FEMA-1609-DR-FL, PA ID 021-99021-00 Dear Mr. Amparo: This Supplement to Second Appeal is filed to provide FEMA with a new Engineering Report commissioned to reconcile the Engineering Reports previously provided by Collier County with respect to its restoration of sand lost from Collier County's engineered mainland beaches as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma in 2005. The Joint Engineering Report is attached. This Report measures the amount of sand lost from the mainland beaches as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma to be 339,451 cubic yards. Since FEMA has previously reimbursed the cost of restoring 136,095 cubic yards, this means that the additional amount of sand actually lost from the beach, above that currently obligated, is 203,356 cubic yards. Accordingly, Collier County revises the amount it is requesting you to reobligate in this Second Appeal, to $6,149,099.06 for direct sand restoration cost (using the FEMA approved unit cost of$30.2381/cy). This is a reduction of$1,440,945.44 in the amount previously requested in this Second Appeal. In addition, the County continues to request reobligation of the actual engineering and survey costs, and the actual environmental permit, mitigation, and compliance costs, of$2,506,840.90, in CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 3 of 8 Supplement to Second Appeal Collier County, Florida PW 2700 — Engineered Beach Restoration January 29, 2015 addition to the $1,853,755.68 already obligated for these costs in the first appeal.' Explanation of Reduction in Amount Requested The principal matter at issue in this appeal is the measurement of sand lost from the County's engineered mainland beaches. The way to measure the amount of sand lost from beaches due to a storm event is by comparing the amount of sand on those beaches before and after the storm event. In this case, the pre-storm survey (to 800 foot depth of closure) used by the County and FEMA was taken in May, 2004. There are three surveys taken shortly after Hurricane Wilma: November 2005 (immediately after the storm); March 2006 (preconstruction survey for beach restoration project); and May 2006 (post-construction survey for beach restoration project).2 FEMA's initial versions of the various PWs obligated to reimburse the cost of sand restoration after Hurricane Wilma were based on the November 2005 survey. PW 2700, version 3, was issued using the March, 2006 survey as reflecting the amount of sand lost from the mainland survey after Hurricane Wilma, but was based on an allocation method, initially suggested by FEMA, for all sand damages including Tropical Storm Gabrielle years earlier. PW 2700, version 6 rejected the allocation methodology, and deobligated funds after reinstating the much lower sand loss estimates made using the November 2005 survey. The initial evaluations of damage and measurement of sand lost from declared major disaster events in Collier County were performed by the County's coastal engineering firm, CB&I Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. (CB&I).3 Collier County submitted CB&I's Engineering Report of January 2010 as part of initial processing of the PWs, and its October 2012 Report in support of the First Appeal; both Reports were provided with the Second Appeal. These Reports determined that the amount of sand lost from the County's engineered mainland beaches was 387,101 cubic yards. In preparing the Second Appeal, the County commissioned Atkins North America (Atkins) to provide an independent analysis of the sand loss from the County's beaches. Atkins' report addressed three topics: See Second Appeal at page 16-19 for an explanation of the engineering, permit, dune restoration, and compliance costs. 2 An additional survey was taken immediately after Hurricane Katrina and before Hurricane Wilma. This survey has no impact on the total measurement of sand loss due to these two Hurricanes; it only affects the allocation of these losses between the two disasters. For convenience, FEMA and Collier County have combined together losses from the two storms in PW 2700. 3 CB&I was formerly known as Coastal Planning& Engineering, Inc. (CPE). 2 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 4 of 8 • Supplement to Second Appeal Collier County, Florida PW 2700— Engineered Beach Restoration January 29, 2015 • the reliability of measurements based on the November 2005 survey on which the initial PWs and the deobligation PWs under appeal were based; • FEMA's concern in the First Appeal Decision that Collier County had not explained the impact on measurement of storm damage using the pre- storm survey in May 2004, which had extended 800 feet into the water, and using the post-storm, pre-construction March 2006 survey which extended only 400 feet into the water, to wading depth; and • provision of an independent measurement of the sand loss caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma, using a "hybrid" survey (March 2006 survey supplemented with data from the June 2006 post-construction survey, which extended the full 800 feet to depth of closure). Atkins' Report was filed with the Second Appeal as Exhibit I. However, Atkins had completed its third task - measurement of sand loss using its hybrid methodology - only in the week before the deadline for filing the Second Appeal. The sand loss measured by Atkins was 243,364 cubic yards - or over 130,000 cubic yards less than the sand loss previously measured by CB&I from what was thought to be the same data. This difference was significantly greater than could be explained simply from the more conservative methodology used by Atkins. However, there was not enough time to investigate and understand this difference before the deadline for the Second Appeal filing. Accordingly, after filing the Second Appeal, Collier County directed both CB&I and Atkins work together to investigate the differences and reconcile the storm damage sand quantities as reported in their reports already in the Record of this Appeal: CB&I's January 2010 and October 2012 Reports and Atkins' Report. Their investigation led to the discovery that CB&I had given Atkins multiple versions of the data for the May 2004 pre-storm survey used in its third task: computing the sand lost from the beach. The survey data file used by Atkins was not the final survey data for May 2004 and contained raw, incomplete and unprocessed data. As a result, Atkins' sand loss measurement was significantly understated. Both Atkins and CB&I have now re-run the measurement based on the correct data for the pre-storm survey; their joint report is provided with this Supplement and its results are summarized above. The amount of sand lost as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma, as measured in the Joint Report, is 47,650 cubic yards less than the 251,006 cubic yards measured in the CB&I Reports of January 2010 and October 2012. As noted in the Joint Report, Atkins and CB&I believe that this difference results from the use of the full profile - the full 800 feet to depth of closure - using the Atkins hybrid methodology, rather than the short profile -400 feet to wading depth - that CB&I had used. In other words, the amount of sand lost due to 3 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 5 of 8 Supplement to Second Appeal Collier County, Florida PW 2700 — Engineered Beach Restoration January 26, 2015 Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma from the on shore/near shore portion of the beach profile (to wading depth), as originally determined by CB&I, was 251,006 cubic yards. This is the amount of sand placed on the beach by the County's beach restoration project, which only covered the portion of the beach to wading depth. However, in the portion of the beach profile between wading depth and depth of closure, the hybrid survey showed 47,650 cubic yards more sand after the storm than before the storm - so the net loss of sand for the full profile of the beach was 203,356 cubic yards. Collier County apologizes for the confusion and erroneous findings by Atkins caused by the mistaken use of the wrong data file. We look forward to meeting with you to answer any questions you may have in this complex matter. Respectfully submitted,iii/(1").11----- -- Ernest B. Abbott Special Counsel, Collier County cc: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Scott Teach, Deputy County Attorney Collier County Ronald K.Schuster Branch Chief, Public Assistance Appeals and Audits Federal Emergency Management Agency Evan G. Rosenberg Bureau Chief, Recovery Florida Division of Emergency Management Attachment: 1) Joint Atkins-CB&l Engineering Report dated January 22, 2015, with Table One "Volume Change Above Depth of Closure 2004-2006" and Beach Profiles. 4 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 6 of 8 ATK I N S 0131 4tlsti W Boy Scout Blvd N:V 8:,:. Supte 700 Tampa Ft 3t i7 Mr. Gary McAlpin Director Collier Coastal Zone Management 2800 N Horseshoe Dr. Naples FL 34104 January 22. 2015 FEMA Deobtigation Amendment to Second Appeal Revised Volumes Dear Mr McAlpin I nis letter is written as a supplement to the information provided to F EMA on October 17 2014. Atkins was contracted by Collier County to perform an independent peer review of the post-storm analysis performed by CB&I Coastal Planning and Engineering. Inc (C13&1)for the I-EMA Disaster 1608-UR-F L Project Worksheet(PW)2700-V6 During the peer review process the volume of sand lost as reported by CB&I could not be fully reconciled by Atkins calculations. The differences between the Atkins and CB&I reports were far greater than should have resulted from independent engineering studies based on the same data The time period for this review was curtailed by the need to complete and submit it within the period specified by law for the filing of the Collier County's Second Appeal Consequently Collier County filed the Second Appeal to PW 2700 on October 17 2014 After filing the Second Appeal. Collier County directed both CB&I and Atkins to continue to work to reconcile the storm damage sand volumes as reported by CB&I in January 2010 and submitted in the Second Appeal Request in October 2014. As a result of this collaborative effort to reconcile the quantities of sand lost due to the storm, it was determined that multiple versions of the May 2004 survey data were provided to Atkins by CB&l The survey data ultimately used by Atkins in the peer review analysis for the Seconc Appeal was not the final survey data hut was rather raw unprocessed data T his was not discovered unt;l after the Second Appeal Request was submitted. 1 o rectify the difference CB&I went back to the original submittal of the survey data in 2004 and located the final processed survey Bata CB&I Bien provided Atkins the correct file for comparison to the 2006 hybrid beach profile survey I he resulting sand quantity calculations agreed within approximately 50.000 cubic yards(CY)of the volume reported in Collier County s First Appeal which was based on CB&I s 2010 report. Atkins and CB&I also now believe that the primary reason for the remaining discrepancy is due to the fact that previous reports were based on shorter wading depth profile lengths while the updated calculations were completed using full length profiles that extend to the depth of closure as FEMA suggested Table 1 shows the change in volume of sand at each profile for the three project areas impacted by the storm The effective distance between profiles was measured at the depth of closure( 11 3 NAVD 88). 1 here volumes were calculated using the hybrid 2006 survey that extends to the depth of closure compared to the pre-storm survey from May 2004 which also extends to the depth of closure CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 7 of 8 Table 1 -Volume Change Above Depth of Closure(NAVDO8)QOU4'2O06 Vanderbilt Volumetric Changes Effective Distance Profile Area From/Tn May 2004 to 2006 Between Profiles(FT) (CY) R-22 to R-23 988 215 R-23 to R-24 1,163 -5,097.6 R-24 to R-25 983 '6.112.8 --- R-25 to R-26 984 -7.4994 ---' R-26 to R'27 1.098 '14.2�7�3 R-27 to R-28 1,001 -17,720.0 R-28 to R-29 887 -12'OQ5�7 - , _ R-29 to R-30 1.038 '9.2288 R'3Oh/ R-31 1,037 -13.D51D R-31 to R-32 1,006 '13.880.3 Vanderbilt Project Area(R-23 to R-31) -85i043 Park Shore Volumetric Changes Effective Distance P�W(eArea From/To ^ May 2004 to 2006 Between Profiles(Fl) (CY) T-50bxR'51 1,330 -19.529.9 R-51 to R-52 886 -4,948.7 R-52�n R,53 1,048 '8.71O�8 F-53toT-54 1,071 -7,725.3 Park Shore Project Area(R-51 to R-53) 41,659 Naples Volumetric Changes Effective Distance Profile Are aFmm /To May 2004 to 2006 Between Profiles(FT) (CY) R-58 to R-59 981 3,394.2 R-59 to R-60 1.085 -582.4 R-60 to R-61 1.077 4.045.3 R-61to1-62 | 1.020 755.1 T-62 to R-63 | 1.009 -12,949.9 R-63VoR-64 1,041 '16.352.4 R-64 to T-65 783 '8,759.1 T-65 to R-66 836 -8'828.4 R-66 to R-67 800 -9'414.8 R-67 to R-68 809 -9,609.6 R-68toT+68 811 -15,352,9 T-69 0oF-70 798 -18,441.4 F-7ONR-71 803 -15,877.5 R'71hoF-72 803 -15.501.7 R-72 to R-73 812 -16,383.8 R-73 to R-74 816 '19.2258 --- R-74 to R-75 790 -20,532.0 R'75 to R'76 800 -13,742.3 R-76 to R-77 798 '12,805.0 R-77 766 '15.001�4 R-78 to R-79 1.106 '27.006.4 Naples Project Area (R-58 to R-78) '321.226 2 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-4 New Business 8 of 8 • Table 2 addresses the adjustment in volume for the annual erosion(12,260 CY/YR)and the adjustment for the volume placed south of Doctors Pass(44,000 CY)when it was dredged in 2006. This table also adjusts for the previously agreed upon obligated FEMA volume of 136,095 CY. Therefore, the total volume of sand due to Collier County in addition to the previously obligated amount would be 203,356 CY. Table 2—Volume Summary Vanderbilt -85,043 Park Shore -11,659 Naples Beach -221,226 SUBTOTAL -317,928 Adj.for Annual Erosion 22,477 Adj.for Dr.Pass Material -44,000 ADJUSTED TOTAL -339,451 FEMA Obligation 136,095 Volume Due -203,356 CB&l has reviewed and accepts the revised volumes calculated by Atkins as described above. Both Atkins Engineering and CB&I have placed their professional seal on this report. °lease accept this Supplement to our Second Appeal to PW 2700. Sincerely, Bryan D. Flynn, PE Thomas P. Pierro, P.E., D CE Sr. Project Manager Director Ports&Coastal Engineering Sector Coastal, Ports& Marine Environmental& Infrastructure `011110044_ 1%•*5 ck P/F4 iii icceNse � .'� � • • V • NAai 4. • Wis v 3 . . Collier County Government r(Ji Growth Management Division Contact: Connie Deane Capital Projects Planning,Impact Fees Community Liaison and Program Management Department 239-252-8192 or 8365 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive colliergov.net Naples,Florida 34104 twitter.com/CollierPIO facebook.com/CollierGov voutube.com/CollierGov Jan. 22,2015 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACCEPTING CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATIONS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA The Coastal Advisory Committee is currently accepting Category "A" grant applications for fiscal year 2015-2016. The application is located on the following Web page http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=1352 and is due by the close of business Tuesday, March 31, 2015. Applications can be mailed to the Coastal Zone Management office, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. For more information, call Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management director, at 239-252-5342 or Gail Hambright, accountant, at 239-252-2966. ### CAC February 23,2015 VIII-7 New Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to review the 2014 Doctors Pass Post Dredge Monitoring Report dated January 2014. OBJECTIVE: To review the 2014 Doctors Pass Post Dredge Monitoring Report dated January 2014. CONSIDERATIONS: This report evaluates the performance of the 2014 maintenance dredging at Doctors Pass and disposal of material in the zone from R-58A-300 to R-64 on the downdrift beach. Maintenance dredging for Doctors Pass and disposal of material occurred in October 2013. A total of 43,998 cubic yards of material was dredged by Orion Marine Group from Doctors Pass and its interior channels and placed south of Doctors Pass. This report compares the October 2013 (post-construction) survey with the most recent survey taken in August 2014 (one-year post-construction of record). This annual monitoring is required by FDEP JCP Permit No. 0235740-001-JC and USACE Permit No. SAJ-2004-8754 (IP-TWM). Since the post-construction (October 2013) survey, Doctors Pass and its interior channels have experienced an overall net volume gain of approximately 9,181 cubic yards. Of this volume, 7,614 cubic yards of the total gain was in the Settling Basin and Entrance channel. A comparison of the pre- and post-construction surveys showed that approximately 43,998 cubic yards of material was dredged from Doctor's Pass and placed immediately south of the Pass. Since the post-construction survey of the placement area (R-58A-300 to R-64) approximately 10,612 cubic yards of material remain within the limits of the placement/spoil area. Significant losses occurred between ranges R-58A and R-58, where 12,800 cubic yards of material were lost in the eleven months from October 2013 to August 2014. No additional action is recommended at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: Yearly monitoring as required via permit is required and will be budgeted on a yearly basis. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: For review only. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and does not present any legal issues. Majority vote is required for approval.—CMG RECOMMENDATION: To review the 2014 Doctors Pass Post Dredge Monitoring Report dated January 2014. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management,Natural Resources Department Attachments: Report CAC February 23,2015 1 VIII-7`New Business 1 of 66 I DOCTORS PASS 2014 Il-YEAR POST CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING MONITORING REPORT Prepared For: i Collier County—Coastal Zone Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 I 1 1 1 i r` - I Prepared By: iAtkins 4030 West Bo) Scout Boulevard.Suite 700 iTampa,FL January 2015 1 1 i CAC February 23,2015 VIII-7*New Business 2 of 66 I DOCTORS PASS 1-YEAR POST CONSTRUCTION 2014 ENGINEERING MONITORING REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report evaluates the performance of the (a) 2014 maintenance dredging at Doctors Pass and (b) disposal of material in the zone from R-58A-300 to R-64 on the downdritt beach. Maintenance dredging for Doctors Pass and disposal of material occurred in October 2013. A total of 43,998 cubic yards of material was dredged by Orion Marine Group from Doctors Pass and its interior channels and placed south of Doctors Pass. This report compares the October 2013 (post-construction) survey with the most. recent survey taken in August 2014 (one-year post-construction of record) This annual monitoring is required by FDEP JCP Permit No.0235740-001-JC and CJSACE Permit No.SAJ-2004-8754(iP-TWM). Since the post-construction (October 2013) survey, Doctors Pass and its interior channels have experienced an overall net volume gain of approximately 9,181 cubic yards. Of this volume, 7,614 cubic yards of the total gain was in the Settling Basin and Entrance Channel. Table 1: Volume Summary Within Limits of Permitted Dredge Template Volume Summary 10/2013 to 08/2014 2013 Dredged Volume Gain(cy) Volume(cy)"f Total Volume : 9,181 43,998 (1) Data provided by Collier County. A comparison of the pre-and post-construction surveys showed that approximately 43,998 cubic yards of material was dredged from Doctor's Pass and placed immediately south of the Pass. Since the post- construction survey of the placement area (R-58A-300 to R-64) approximately 10,612 cubic yards of material remain within the limits of the placement/spoil area. Significant losses occurred between ranges R-58A and R-58,where 12,800 cubic yards of material were lost in the eleven months from October 2013 to August 2014. I I I I - INS I CAC February 23,2015 VIII-7*New Business 3 of 66 I DOCTORS PASS 2014 ENGINEERING MONITORING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .. 1 II. HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS 1 III. DOCTORS PASS VOLUMETRIC CHANGE 3 IV. BEACH SEGMENT VOLUME&SHORELINE CHANGE 11 V. CONCLUSIONS&RECOMMENDATIONS 13 VI. REFERENCES 14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Datum Conversions 2 Figure 2: Doctors Pass Dredge Template Segments 4 Figure 3: Settling Basin typical cross section 6 Figure 4: Entrance Channel West cross section at shoaled area 7 Figure 5: Entrance Channel East Typical Section... 8 Figure 6:Turning Basin Typical Section 9 Figure 7:West Channel Typical Cross-Section. 10 Figure 8: R-58A Comparative Profile. 12 Figure 9: R-58A Comparative Profile showing shoreline change. 13 Figure 10:Differential Contour Map 14 1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.2014 Morgan and Eklund Control Points 2 Table 2:Doctors Pass Segments and Datum Conversions 3 Table 3:Doctors Pass Volumes S Table 4:Turning Basin Volumes 9 Table 5: Moorings Bay West Channel Volumes 10 Table 6: Moorings Bay East Channel Volumes 11 Table 7: Placement Area(R-58A to R-64)Volumetric Changes to-6 feet NAVD88 12 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Doctors Pass Survey Map and Cross Sections Appendix F3, Disposal Area Profiles ATKINS I I I CAC February 23,2015 VIII-7*New Business 4 of 66 I DOCTORS PASS 2014 ENGINEERING MONITORING REPORT I. INTRODUCTION This report describes the performance and volumetric changes for Doctors Pass,which is located between Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) monuments T-57 and R-58A, from October 2013 (post-construction) through August 2014 (one-year post-construction of record). This annual monitoring is required by FDEP JCP Permit No. 0235740-001-JC and USACE Permit No. SAJ-2004- 8754(IP-TWM). From September to October 2013, a maintenance dredging event designed to dredge and dispose of approximately 38,000 cubic yards of sediment was conducted. The disposal area is immediately downdrift of Doctors Pass from FDEP reference monuments R-58A-300 to R-64. According to pay volumes, approximately 43,998 cubic yards of material was excavated. The volumetric and shoreline change since completion of construction (October 2013) assessed utilizing the project post construction (October 2013) survey and the one-year monitoring post-construction (August 2014) survey. A location map of the monitoring area can be found in Appendix A. HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS The annual monitoring of Doctors Pass requires a bathymetric survey performed along previously established survey track lines. This data allows Collier County and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)to continually observe and assess the performance of the maintenance dredging at Doctors Pass. The annual monitoring surveys are needed to observe the performance of the maintenance dredging and assess these projects' affects on adjacent shorelines.The scientific monitoring process also provides information necessary to plan,design and optimize future projects. Surveyors from Morgan & Eklund, Inc. (M&E) conducted the bathymetric survey of Doctors Pass and interior channels on August 27, 2014. All vertical elevations from the 2014 survey are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88)and all horizontal data is referenced to the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone,North American Datum of 1983/90(NAD 83190). The horizontal positioning for the ebb shoal bathymetric survey relied upon Real-time Kinematic GPS, with the GPS base station receiver set on Point#409,provided in Table 1. I I I I AFKINS CAC February 23,2015 vm-r New Business I omoo I Twb� l.%014 Mxr�nmwd I Monument Northing ' Gum�� Elevation Stamping Description A`-}] 676453.59 300667.14 5.77 64�8-A|1 K�8��lRC ' - IuR-52 675291.90 388834.00 0.52��QLL CO. 7] DNR Disc inCuncnno D'�� 672|�|.|0 388974.60 7.13 O'55COLL-CO. 1979 DNR Disc in Concrete T-57 670447.68 389142.00 1.91 T-57 COLL. CO. 78 DNR Disc in Concrete R-60 666685.10 390145.20 4.67 ' R-6000LL CO. 73 DNB Disc \nCunonoc I 3|5 �72206.40 30�862.37 14.05 ., 4298 &46tE1RC 316 689991.91 389035.15 6.13 4298 MdbE IRC 1 ' 317 669925.74 309034.90 - 8.95 4298 M&E IRC Offshore data collection performed to FDEP specifications by Morgan & Eklund, Inc. utilized a 26' IParker survey vessel, Trimble SPS 852 Real-Time Kinematic QP8, Hypack Navigation Software. an Odom CVM Digital Eobououndcrund a TSS Motion Compensator for data collection. Calibration of thc fathometer (depth sounder) involved adjusting for vessel squat and settlement while underway, vessel I droft` and the speed of sound in water (bar check). Both analog and digital boboner readings were calibrated at the beginning and end of each survey day and after replacing paper charts. IElevations for the ebb shoal bathymetric survey relied on Real-time Kinematic tide files and were verified with a tide stall and tide gauge set near Point#409 with an elevation of 8.95 feet NAVD 88 on March 28, 2013. The survey boat navigated along each umnumc/ using the steering indicator in Hypack and the I cmm,dinoucs and depth soundings were simultaneously collected every 20 feet along the profile line. The digital tachometer collected readings to the nearest 0.1 foot. The resultant accuracy of the bottom Ielevations. from leveling to staff. staff accuracy, positional accuracy and sounding accuracy. are within ±0.5 feet.as stipulated in the FDEP specifications. Tbw20|3uomvuyn�ondu]c\�:�imumiun:0zmnruun�eY4onbAnm�cun`�emiomlDatuomof|g#0()NA^'�C} I 88), as requested by the FDEP. In order to convert to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29, datum previously used in permits and construction drawings) or to Mean Lower Low Water I (&�LL�V,Duouooummuoo|yu»cdunnmiQa6mn c6ur�)onumu,�rr0zrm tho nou�xt ddo| bcnobmark. For Doctors Pass the closest tidal benchmark is Tide Station 872-5110 Naples Gulf of Mexico. Figure lshows the conversion between MLLW and NAVD88 of 2.3 feet. Therefore if you have and elevation shown on I /6nnun'eyoy'5.3 tent NA`P0 80 aodyou su6tuctu -2.3` onr wmuldgt 'l0fecr &8LLVV. K8LL�� wiU show a shallower number than NGVD 29 which is shallower than NAVD 88. Figure 1 shows the conversion from MA VO/#8to NGVD Iq and ouMLLVy. IFigure 1: Datum Conversions NGVD29 wxvmVo I �*w°1er +0 33' I wLLvv'1 nr -2 a I ATKINS 2 CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7*New Business 6 of 66 I HI. DOCTORS PASS VOLUMETRIC CHANGE IIIIn 2013 the maintenance dredging project excavated approximately 43,998 cubic yards of material from Doctors Pass. Based on the comparison of October 2013 and August 2014 surveys, the analysis shows Ithat the pass and interior channels had an overall net gain in volume of approximately 9.181 cubic yards. The dredge template is divided into eight segments as reflected in Table 2. These segments and the I associated stationing are shown in Figure 2. Note that the following segments were not dredged during the last dredge event(October 2013): I • Moorings Bay West Channel o North Segment(not permitted) O Middle Segment I • Moorings Bay East Channel O East Channel O South Channel I Table 2: Doctors Pass Segments and Datum Conversions I Segment Stations Dredge Cut Dredge Cut (ft,NGVD29) (ft,NAVD88) I Settling Basin 0+00 to 6+34 -14.0 -15.3 Entrance Channel Doctors Pass 6434 to 12+00 00 -9.0 -10.3 ,..... ._....... ... ., .. . I Entrance Channel East 12+00 to 15+70 -8.0 -9.3 .., Turning Basin Turning Basin 6+78 to 11+35 -8.0 -9,27 ISouth 0+00 to 3+56 -8.0 -9.3 ddl Moorings Bay Middle II West Channel (not dredged) North 3+56 to 8+12 -7.0 --------- -8.3 (not permitted) 8+12 to 19+00 NA NA I South Channel Moorings Bay ... (pot dredged) 4+85 to 6+78 -7.0 -8.3 _ _____....... ......._............. ....... East Channel East Channel 1 I (not dredged) 11+35 to 17+51 1 -7.0 -8.3 I I I ATK INS 3 I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7'New Business 7 of 66 I Figure 2: Doctors Pass Dredge Template Segments 1........L. I I . I I C I I l t illiiii? 4.1,4141164 MGM 6111Vd IMMO till ' - s5 = irora oarou+ow ra Nv+ao woo Y iz • a Trio ir+wa I I t_)E l I 'l I r 't ~' !. t b' a 'y. i " r sr .fit 1 ff . 0 i � � � . I!!! . it 1 • N . • . . 1 . . ( .. , 4, 1 i; I ' 1 tr I f z. . I , i!td-: I � gll 121 toll w-11 il I . 6 r .4 1 _ iwi ` iF 11 i4 I MV .....46.40D____ , gl 1 I e 1 . 1 i 1 D I 0 I • 1 i 1 ___•. _.. ........_....;_ I ATKI S 4 I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7'New Business 8 of 66 I A. Doctors Pass Dredge Segments(Settling Basin, Entrance Channel West, Entrance Channel I East) I. Settling Basin: IThe Doctors Pass Settling Basin is located just outside of Doctors Pass and includes the ebb shoal. This dredge segment is permitted to a cut elevation of-15.3 feet NAVD 88(-14.0 ft NGVD 29). The I Settling Basin has seen the largest increase in volume of all the dredge template sections with 6,985 cubic yard increase since the 2013 survey. As reflected in Table 3 the total volume dredged from the settling basin in 2013 was 30,236 cubic yards. Therefore approximately 23% of the total volume I dredged from the settling basin has shoaled in from October 2013(post-construction)to August 2014 (one-year post-construction). Figure 3 reflects the infilling that has occurred just inside the south jetty as a result of the material just outside the dredge template adjusting. ITable 3: Doctors Pass Volumes I Dredge Cut 10/2013 2013 Dredge Cut to 08/2014 Volume Segment Stations (ft,NGVD29) (ft.NAVD88) Volume Dredged II Settling Gain(cy) (t,"(1) Basin 0+00 to 6+34 -14,0 -153 6,985 30,236 I Entrance Channel West 6434 to 12400 -9.0 -10.3 575 4,818 I Entrance Channel East 12400 to 15+70 -8.0 -9.3 55 467 Subtotal: 7,614 35,521 I (1) Volumes provided by Collier County I I I I I I ArKIN5 5 a CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7*New Business 9 of 66 I Figure 3 depicts the changes from post-construction to one-year post construction at the mouth of the I pass at Station 2+50 in the settling basin. Figure 3: Settling Basin typical cross section Settling Basin I N 2+50 $ > 10 , .__._..._... 10 _ o' O 5 � > -I Z 0 0 z � - lit w 5 z z 'S n u� rn • -10 -10 Z ¢ < -15 d -15 0 1 -20 V -20 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 10C 150 200 250 300 I -•--DREDGE TEMPLATE — 102013 POST CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 2014 MONITORING SURVEY i ACCRETED MATERIAL ERODED MATERIAL I I I I I • 1 I I I ATKINS 6 I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7*New Business 10 of 66 I ii. Entrance Channel !Vest: IThe Entrance Channel West begins at the west end of the south jetty and extends into the pass proper. The dredge cut elevation is -10.3 ft NAVD 88 (-9.0 ft NGVD 29). The West Entrance channel runs I roughly the length of the rubble rip rap along the south jetty in the aerial photo. This segment has gained 575 cubic yard since the 2013 survey. As reflected in Table 3 the total volume dredged from the entrance channel west in 2013 was 4,818 cubic yards. Therefore approximately 12%of the total I volume dredged from the entrance channel west has shoaled in the first year since construction. Figure 4 shows a typical section in the Entrance Channel West. Figure 4:Entrance Channel West cross section at shoaled area IEntrance Channel West 4--N 8+50 5 I00 m 0 5 , 5 v 11.1 2 C/1 m -1t7 " � .; -10 Z e0 U) Ili I -20 .,.... ,, .. , .. _ .......i-20 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 ----DREDGE TEMPLATE ---10.2013 POST CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1 - 2014 MONITORING SURVEY Ell,ACCRETED MATERIAL .WWT ERODED MATERIAL I I I I I I K I 7 ,T I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7*New Business 11 of 66 I IHi. Entrance Channel East: The East Entrance Channel starts approximately at the west terminus of the concrete seawall cap on a the south side of the pass and extends east to where the pass proper opens into the Turning Basin.The dredge cut elevation for this segment is -9.3 ft NAVD 88(-8.0 ft NGVD 29). This area accumulated 55 cubic yards over the past year. Although this segment has accumulated material Figure 5 shows Ithat both the post-construction and one-year post-construction surveys are below the dredge template. Figure 5: Entrance Channel East Typical Section I 4----N Entrance Channel East 14+00 s 10 -- _.... _........ ---- , 10 • i-o- co o 5• m - 5 r.i > < -I i.- w 0 _ w z I - vs z •-10— p. a < 111 • w> _J W .-15 • co co -20' - • - . , . . . - - - -20 I -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 ----DREDGE TEMPLATE ---10.2013 POST CONSTRUCTION SURVEY --- 2014 MONITORING SURVEY ;ACCRETED MATERIAL lIlT ERODED MATERIAL I I I I I I I Al KINS 8 I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7*New Business 12 of 66 I A. Turning Basin Dredge Segment IThe Doctors Pass Turning Basin is the location where the backbay channels and the pass proper come together. This confluence of channels from the Gulf and Moorings Bay is a wider area where currents I slow and sediment begins to fall out of suspension. The Turning Basin leads from the pass to the start of the flood shoal and the location where the main channel trifurcates into the east,west and south channels in Moorings Bay. As shown in the cross-section in Figure 6. the permitted dredge cut elevation is -9.3 ft I NAVD 88(-8.0 ft NGVD 29).The Turning Basin accumulated 881 cubic yards from 2013 to 2014(Table 4). ITable 4:Turning Basin Volumes 10/2013 2013 Volume Dredge Cut Dredge Cut to 08/2014 Dred ed Segment Stations (ft,NGVD29) (ft,NAVD88) Volume gig Gain(cy) (cy) I Turning Basin 6+78 to 11+35 -8.(1 -9.27 881 6,685 Subtotal: 881 6,685 (I) Volumes provided by Collier County IFigure 6:Turning Basin Typical Section Turning Basin --- . W 9 00 f--> 10....._....—_.._._........ _ ..__.„................._....... _.........................._,_,_ ... _,_..w._. 10 m 0 5` -5 m ".C.- Q , i0 0 F- W N -5 -5 m m Q 117 -10 z ' F- w •15 ' `-15 c�a ca I -20:... ,......... , .__ . . . , . -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 r DREDGE TEMPLATE --10.2013 POST CONSTRUCTION SURVEY I ----- 2014 MONITORING SURVEY 1_ . ACCRETED MATERIAL ERODED MATERIAL I I ATKINS 9 I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7*New Business 13 of 66 I B. Moorings Bay West Channel Dredge Segment IThe West Channel in Moorings Bay is one of two routes for boaters to access Moorings l3ay to the north. The West Channel is divided into three segments. The North segment is not permitted for dredging I currently and the Middle segment was not dredged as part of the last dredge event. The South segment (Sta.0+00 to Sta. 3°+56)has a permitted dredge elevation of-9.3 ft NAVE)88 (-8.0 ft NGVD 29)and the Middle segment (Sta. 3+56 to Sta. 8412) is permitted to -8.3 ft NAVE) 88 (-7.0 t3 NGVD 29). This I section is bounded on the west by private docks and on the cast by the Moorings Bay flood shoal. As Figure 7 shows the flood shoal typically grows into the channel from the east boundary (right side of the cross-section)requiring maintenance dredging. IFigure 7: West Channel Typical Cross-Section. West Channel 10+ _ 10 m 5 5 rn I 0 ¢ -1 z 0- . 0 z r- to w lLi -5 z Z -5 ` rrn _ -4 I co 'O_t0. _ -10 Z H G -15 +-150 ill a ....t til co -20,.. _ - ,-20 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 I ----DREDGE TEMPLATE --. -10.2013 POST CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 2014 MONITORING SURVEY ACCRETED MATERIAL ERODED MATERIAL I The South segment has accumulated 344 cubic yards from 2013 to 2014 (Table 5) and currently holds while the Middle segment has gained only 150 cubic yards. ITable 5: Moorings Bay West Channel Volumes Dredge Cut Dredge Cut 10/2013 2013 II Segment Stations (ft, to 08/2014 Volume g (ft, Volume Dredged NGVD29) NAVD88) Cain ,t_cy) (cy)t't I — South 0+00 to 3°+56 -8.0 -9.3 344 1,793 Middle 3+56 to 8+12 -7.0 -8.3 150 0 Subtotal: 493 _ 1,793 III (I) Volumes provided by Collier County I 1 TK 0 I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7"New Business 14 of 66 I C. Moorings Bay East Channel Dredge Segment 11 The East Channel in Moorings Bay is divided into two segments. Neither of the segments were dredged during the last dredge event. The South Channel segment (Sta.44.85 to Sta.6+78)has a permitted dredge I elevation of-8.3 ft NAVD 88 (-7.0 ft NGVD 29) and the East Channel segment (Sta. 11+35 to Sta. 17+51) is also permitted to -8,3 ft NAVD 88 (-7.0 fl NGVD 29). Note that Moorings Bay East Channel was not during the most recent dredge event. This section is bounded on the west by the Moorings Bay I flood shoal and on the east by private docks. As Table 6 shows there is typically only a small volume contained in these segments with the South Channel segment accumulating 24 cubic yards while the East Channel segment accumulated l68 cubic yards. ITable 6: Moorings Bay East Channel Volumes I 1012013 2013 Segment Stations Dredge Cut Dredge Cut to 08/2014 Volume (ft,NGVD29) (ft,NAVD88) Volume Gain Dredged (cy) (cy)ue ISouth Channel 4+85 to 6+78 -7.0 -8.3 24 0 11+35 to I East Channel 17+51 _ -7.0 -8.3 168 0 Subtotal: 192 0 (1) Volumes provided by Collier County I IV. BEACH SEGMENT VOLUME& SHORELINE CHANGE I The material dredged from Doctors Pass was disposed of immediately south of Doctors Pass from R-58A- 300 to R-64. Beach surveys were conducted from R-58A to R-64 in October 2013(post-construction)and August 2014(1-year post-construction). The volume change and shoreline change from October 2013 to 1 August 2014 are evaluated as part of this physical monitoring effort. L Volume Change The volume change for the profiles was calculated above -6 feet NAVD88 as this segment of the beach profile generally captures the area where material was placed. Note that this doesn't account for material I adjustment and changes below the -6 foot contour. This elevation is the approximate location where the toe of fill intercepted the pre-construction profile. Between R-58 and R-58A significant amounts of erosion have occurred from October 2013 to August 2014. Approximately 12,800 cubic yards of material 1 has eroded from this beach segment in the 10 month period. Significant erosion is expected to occur at this location due to its proximity to Doctors Pass and the north to south longshore sediment transport.The volumetric change for the placement area ranged from 12,800 cubic yards of material lost from R-58A to I R-58(north end of placement area)to 4,499 cubic yards of material gained from R-63 to R-64(south end of placement area).Overall 10.612 cubic yards of material remains when comparing the two surveys from R-58A to R-64. Figure 8 reflects the comparison of the October 2013 and August 2014 surveys at R-58A. 1 I ATKINS 11 I CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7*New Business 15 of 66 I Figure 8: R-58A Comparative Profile. I I I I I Table 7: Placement Area(R-58A to R-64)Volumetric Changes to-6 feet NA\'D88 I Volumetric Changes Effective Profile Area From To Distance Between 2013 to 2014 I Monuments(FT 1 ('V 1)oclors Pass IR-58A to R-58 599 -12,800 R-58 to R-59 981 545 I R-59 to R-60 1.085 6.466 R-60 to R-60-518 518 422 R-60+518 to R-61 559 -62 I R-61 to R-61-4408 408 838 R-61-+408 to R 61+816 408 2.378 R-61'816 to T-62 204 1.479 IT-62 to R-63 1.009 6.848 R-63 to R-64 1.186 4.499 I Naples Beach Project Area 6,958 10,612 (R-58A to R-64) I Monitoring Area 6,958 10.612 (R-58A to R-5.1) I I ATKINS 12 CAC February euomo w|n~�wo�n�x I I �nmoo ii. Shoreline Change ITboxho�|innchon0e �ocuohoompmmhvcuro�\^*asxva|uu�dui/beK4cmnHighl�uurLine(K�HVVL, +0.33MNAl7D08). The shoreline change from October 2013 to August 2014 ranged from 187 feet of moonsiuua\ R-58A /u52-5 feet of seaward advance at R'j0. The ov�oilaverage shoreline change hnm I R'50/\to��'&4i^4.7�e,o[seaward advance. IFigure 9: �K-5*A Comparative Pmw00eshowing ohom�inmchmn��. =.**n'm^ . ' . —�---r---r--- . / --r---r--' . ,---, .' 0:(;,3 I ,:r . / -- - ~ . I z | - S'. o ` - N� ''� '-- m� = -m I . ^ . ^ _`�� '� -� � � � � ZIX A,C. .30.0 ,'0 Vt.) °,t sm'— �'m--- sc am mn c.sm"qx.^wng Prnyem' IV. CONCLUSIONS&RECOMMENDATIONS IDocursPosyhu« u �pioo|ly6ecn dro6gndmmm }4yeurromtion. Docums Pu,sand i/s in�hor xhaondx have gained 9,181 cubic yards of material from October 2013 to August 2014. Of the material that has shoaled within Doo|o� Pass and the in^orimoubaou�x 7.6}4onNc yards has uocmnu|u�d in the 8cu(|ng I8usin und thc Eos\ond ��cs/ Entumor Chwnne}s AkhuuAh mhmohng 6mm uccuoed itdm�sou/uppcur,o 6e Channels. affecting navigation and the Pass appears to be on track for the same maintenance interval. I For rhc diapmou! area [� o immodiu»c\ysuudboyctw Pusm (R'58�\'3oO /n K'h4) e total o[ |0,6|2 cu6iv yards of material that was placed as part of the dredge and disposal event in October 2013 remains. This area has also recognized shoreline change that ranges from 107 feet of recession to 52.5 feet of advance. It is recommended tha bathymetric surveys of the Pass, including the flood and ebb shoals be continued annually. These data would be used for future volumetric comparisons and would provide a better understanding of how these shoals interface with the Pass and affect /h* overall volume change. Also timing for the next maintenance dredge interval can be planned to ensure safe navigation. I I I 13 CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7`New Business 17 of 66 I Figure 10: Differential Contour \lap I Il ■ ,. • %, : • U • II I W Wool NI BA 1 1 ` II i.#6•M, 7,.1 - I IVI. REFERENCES Atkins. Doctors Pass 2013 Engineering Monitoring Report. April 2013. 1 Coastal Planning & Engineering. Inc.. Wiggins and Doctors Passes 2009 Maintenance Dredging Post- Construction Report.July 2009. ICoastal Planning & Engineering, Inc . North County Passes: Wiggins. Doctors, and Clam Passes 2010 Engineering Monitoring Report.October 2010. IHumiston & Moore. Inc.. Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging 2012 Three-Year Post Construction Monitoring Summary,August 2012. I I I ATKINS 14 I CAC February 23,2015 VIII-7*New Business 18 of 66 Appendix A Doctors Pass Survey Map and Cross Sections 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I • MO r NM OM I r MN • MN MN OM MN NM MN MN ' r OM r ------- , F 1 ,r ms 1 i, m i 9 aft 2 z Vp \ i C) H 1 82 O N 10 > E Cl)v 1 r ) Z _.. 0 s Z .1 , ;--M'0'— 1 7:1 rn N q 4-,f,p r° m b� � � Nn ? (A D 71 Z O >0 T � m I � I— CD 1 n z • 3M1 20 y. i LI ilifti ;1114 s o� �� 1 i 14; I mD g ; Zpp O O y Dp ry I Cmmm t m y _1 I al I t§W g i$ 111;...re. A! ' g A i 9 , o , AA i F ; �I; < it 1 i n P C-0 o l ! ' s n P Iy m h . 1 > ge* "128! P fl 9 1 %IP ,1 4: 9 O Rtli m 1 .,g1 -< bop Jr i :- 41 q2 X 5 -4 it 1 q1 § " "g < 3 x o a a '12 ii I !1 l "R*1 gg. X 1 e t� /O 4m 0111 0 is Yn�N • r me r MB EN No ma NE am EN all ow ININ SIM D I 0 I - m m I 0 T Fes" IIIIII m , ,.., x#A ;+ s n ' a � _ x�,m - 8 ,'''''A,".°� �. .« ,p ti �_ il, CO �, � �; m LSO k ?, S ,, asxv O iro% 0,„ 7.- , A.4`- .., ,•' 1.,' •tX� „° 4 '.4- Mew » <� i '� �4, maw A -1, .,'. ;:4%.1:',/,',"0 '1/4,..''''.- 4‘to_ , ,..T "-' , ikr, ^� «T- N O a Lie "`� � .d �', 0 — rn p a rl 4 Y I .' *� C) O e, x t ' ' "" '' r ° j,. ask m :4,;#1,-it,!.! m ^ { �. k! of ' ( , -. , — Ia x 0 cri O +r 5 � .t :ar� N D K rr COLLIER coUNTY _._..... f 3(� 2800 N.MORSESFIOE ORNE •.w....:--:::--::.z===.:"�........�. _..._ -_ ..... {t Z 2 ? {r J NAPLES.R311W n.�-...-a.. . �..... _ ._ 2 j .yew... : ."..:...�"- . . o b e �_ NAPLES BEACH NOURISHMENT m }/ ° o *9 All!rl VICINITY MAP AND SHEET LAYOUT =I... �^ ..+.......+. x ED GATE: m 0 —j—_ o I m I r I c� OM • OM NM MN III. Ill. 11111 laill 81.1 MI II am mill K0 m;0f66 -n ,.,.......,.,, I 0 I 0 II > 1— w GULF OF MEXICO • 0 . 41 ..... I 0) , '4 '4 S co 9, Ii I 1 ilt*:1: . , —,4,--.4":,, ' 1.. V• -0" ,,,, 4 ' i ' , I ,. I, .,,,,, ' ,. ■ ,, r .„.,,. _ ...6. 1 :. ,ro %,,,, I .,..?., „.. ' Q°"43REflk-7:4 eg, I.: 4 .M A' ' ' ", 1 t t ..st* ' i '., I' '' t 1 . , °*elf' ' :4' ''' 1 i "..... ' i''' * '"•*. 11 :y. — ..." ••• .; .: :F, .;:?; 7-.R. a A% 4 " 7 gi • ''":" :11 3' 114 .:1i :,': :I: .1: li .1 W 1 Eili Ert,ii di IA ..7:y ;:ii 4.; ::: 1:' .-:: :..-P 7141 Fill – – 4 6 It eti, gli !if ...t, E-f.Ei V:. p ...., ail ..6.5. al kag Z1■ ." :...P .4. a -0.- N4eii,UL•17 '.41441'... ':47 _. 11 _ — -41 -*/ -- • iE ,,,,, '..V. ... ... 1 '.;./..„P.... . I. .. ...., ... .... ... . ., .W :.„.” .. , . 30, , . , 47 ::: *LI., •11; tti :" ai" 7 4,0..< '''... 441 .4:.,1 MOORINGS BAY , 4 L.* , , i).•,. _ ( . , ,,r) ,,,t,r4....,,... .4- COLLIER COUNTY 1 .7z,747,7,„....7....47 " III 111 I III! ›......1 MOO N HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES FL 34104 :,..... AI 31 Jga X COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT -7--•-7744.117il. " "-Fivii.,::•.:„....: g 1141 F:i'l'tr 2 "' ek.fi, lel ,., vl DOCTORS PASS.MONITORING SURVEY 1 ,i.....i.,, __ , ...s.7 ,,.. DATA POINT PLOT0 tpi IV' i • 1.--- i ORIGINAL ISSUED OATS 11 1 0 I V ) r==.::::;;:i:A*7-Z77`,.....7*";...1.1 IN IIIII ME MB IMO EMI - 111111 MN SIM 11111 OM UM 1/111. 1.111 .IF7b us neS'S'" - 22 of 66 a.,.. e.V+.u+.<.w.•.+»-.tee»:• +.+eiw»..».,D040.«..W.,w.as-mw ..o.s. .,«. D S I 0 0 m 7 41 GULF OF MEXICO • »: fit n k' mr :ti:M . .�_ N rn n r.: :a :15 At au co ..... • CO it sl: lE :1E At xz ;t MN 6M It . It r„ v a.. .ax lt r.4. a 1. a% Ha* lit iitE r: E 4. a ..... 17 iii1iiiil a " i�c f ' . .k `.„ ii ” Fi i � e3", • iii "iitC Ja i i isi �` v j i i ` r i iiiii. iii ,gisi i '. t 4cii `;;;iiii° ii=fte• m .. ;;t ii E - iJ�iii Eiii irl a re iii/" Oik2 i a/440614 t/i0 iiiii1» i4E iiixe: _, : 1: s iiii=i r - at. „:t t , iiiii ii y r r ccii`'i :i:EiEisE?iiii 3 > µ iifi,..E iig1iiiiit- IF ii E i ti te 21' `. y iE:.:3'.' �» .> d t% = uifwe/b r. iE w .. ,.d. Ei 'TS , (J ililii" r L. ,S.., 1 ."'''''.. tg,'1, t ,......,.. .„ 1,,,,,,y-t.,411/4,‘,E4rki::iiii i ,iri ;7:8'i'.: tt �h ei ii¢t m N a .�. ' ki„.;44„,,,v, .4, '* ,,, ,. .-.53. IC:iv* .0! *- ''' ' 1, d epq� iii tail It :'� �� s — ooh` x • i 9 COLLIER OU »............... { » 7800 N.NAPLES HORSESHOE OR ME '” !y� it _/ NAPLES,FL:"° - '^ t r ct I }Cq• tf COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT I {i e' J it 10 a G e Q!Ni __:'....•-.::.........:u... rM'.w a..v.°rr.'.°i _.� 1 S 1",t (J1 ....DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING SURVEY ,ti°::°:»:w..`�..:'°m'm"'.:' ...............__._......._.. �R..................._... } DATA POINT PLOT """"' "___ .,. owIwurweo In: Millil 111111 I 7* 23 of 66 WIN aill 111111 ,,,, V•w-N�'+ti cm .. 1 tiwr\b-w .O.' . ref.by,f Mw D I 0 0 m t); 411F1 r: ,,+- woowno LMl oa k.,,,,...1€ k^ . 4 Y V ..8 S' f'-i' C tits E 5e I * `2 »'1 - t � f. } „.a (, .�<� , ,• .l 6 Jti ,/ €` `wa ...„4„.. is r " •' `'.. ^to s+m p� -, k i 71d' �} , H ,. tae d€€ 71 .di co v "" y«• mo b,ffi $e a 6"" � x1gt,1",4 '" a ` �r� r ;" �"s:"" ' 4:„,,,,,,,'*' ' ,4••,-' °t' -14, . a ue ,_.. fF ti,1" , 11 .^. 4,4r,fi '11, 1 i V , 4, ,*‘747,44 'a x 0- ' ?el'w:. ms ti. ;M "c , . d<444 7,*. 1,,,,,, , m x r'4 -s am 4 w y ' nd �/ a � y i. � "w 8' fi±i "'� �+} h .„ 1%ii.be, ..'. '''' % ,1•6 44,,'-' '' - Air' l''''' , *,,/,,„ s Rm ' ,, � ,,„,,,,,,,,* -,,,.....,,,,., .i. E,- t„, ,t..... -, * , ,, ,,,., . .. ,`,0 401A-.:1;;:i -,p41% ,.116 x -"*-.' - 4 o*, * ' ''''' F ' . — 61 i 4$-• ; 0 , ,*' -'4'il*0'::'::,c'.4* ,, '0,14. ., \ii;:i 4,04 44 , , ).1' e „ , iiirk, . h.,,,, .; c _ , .4,. ,, ...4 1. ' ,'.0. i''' $4, AL,,,,..„,,7. "Ar,„,t.„,,/ '- .,. j i 4. ' . .t.„,.. "A',tip 3 .,.& .., A,2 F> b $ P M `4 F g ” » A �g ,40' II t ''''. E" '4111'' ,; ., w a r a € , � . I t yew a y .!1 - �.». -i ,� I fd' �!s > $ 'a E 4 a� �p '�' sx. '*bs.:.. q COLLIER COUNTY AN " q66' p[ 2 N RORSESNOED E •^^— 4j^ i i t ij BW RIV 6''._.................. I d a i = NAPLES.fL 3i 106 wwsx..m.,..ww•...xx«.,..,.:.. ___._....._.. r COWER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT ,..- ,, „ N r.,*!� 1' N DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING SURVEY l._ DATA POINT PLOT w x- �' '� ' max:,e,,...a««=w-•-.:"® —....__._... > I x ux0 - � m n A Nis am Eso um I= sue or soi EN me me me am me ow Oft Feb.13 21eNi me II-7' usine 20 of 66 > CD 0 0 It".. 1:40 GULF OF MEXICO V: It. „ i 0 il„V '".. 34: ".” It I 00 Mt 00 1 xi: 3t 1 14. -- .It 21: ... ... 33 ;a rst — 2 I2: Of It 34 00 140 Kt ri M '". .6. liE — IR II .. ... ... ,_ .1..: .... - -.. - .... tr. -tr. .... ,„. Z. N. sJ .4 44. " zt rx I It -1,... 00 36 II 4 P Itt gj: ni Zr. us.. iti. us. IV Ts: lit 11,:. 0 0 44 It ?st tit il: — LIE Ti Vi it ..- 31.. is. ... 'It 00 00 33 1m. re: TA — .. N at — — l'i ....... - _ - - 2 o. - - - - _ Jr. 3t a .▪.. lif .O. St ..,.. "" ,..,. •13: 00 00 It. St. ZIt itt 4,.... It Vt .i.li 31: g: 21:... 4 .... ,„.., 33 4 21: if ,Ig ,... 4. flt gt ,.. _ it At It .64. 1■11. 2 t ..E: ... 20 IS. (4 ".• ::: 1.0 lit •,. ,,,. les. ay. •s• ....., '.. E. tr :6*. 4. li:. ,... .'" '''' " ....... 1 .▪". ••• " .24. 23 43 - 144t P.; 1 4. .* 4. tt. i .. , * , 1 ' 424 .. •4 .* C 4 ''''' 1, ' , I .'. , „4'. ... ,, ‘ 1., * i Ail 6oLuERbou laNTyli 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE f NAPLES,FL 34104 "."1 ...-7—... F.t."'":::::"4:4,"2:4:: ,4 - .2. 't r... COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT c' ca a co....I■ •■■■•■ r.g.r.zzo-pr.r=7;=.-+.--... .#, - DOCTOFtS PASS-MONITORING SURVEY 2::::77—,::::771.7.raT,...grit,, _ 4.47... .. DATA POINT PLOT ,‘, ORIGINAL=UM DATE S . > w ' 0 1 0 In 1 11 0 am mu NE INN al al ma No am ow we ow ow • 111111111 IiiirebWit 2°011 VIII 1-7* sine 25 of 66 > I 0 I 0 o 1 m : 7, 0 ** ... .... ..... '". .04. GULF OF MEXICO i „.. . ..--..aptieg>.-- "•• 1 .0.. ,... 01.• N. " N. N. 41 — 414: .... „.. ... ....„.. „.. ____ l'Y .... .... -' „.. .... It .. V: '". %. '•. „.. ... 0 1. A. 11• co 11t .4. 0 ... at " ,.., 4... U: - .,. ,o. 3:: .”. ,... it "•- 31: ... . ... 1. . •.. •4 rt. IP b. 411: — ... NH .4.: ..„ . . ... Y.• . ... ttt .• N.• . 31: ."' if .... ..... ,,,. ....,. . at A14. NA: . it . . N. ,.. ... . ..• 1...• ,,.., .. N. N. 11". . ,.... ii ..... .,.. .. ..... ... ... — ... ... 1:e...-:::1 ,.. . 14. NA• 11..... 14.. ttr. v.' .... rtr: .... ,.. .1.4. "--. E. .... ... ... .... — — Pr .... It — ... .... it — ... ... ...". At ...- A A .... ..... aC '"- ..... „. .., .... . "." 31: ....,. ,.. It ... . .04 1.1. _ 3:. ... It 11r. ..... .".." 11.. ... ... 41 la .... 0. It Ah " . . . .... "4: tr .. V. •• •■ •.• . 4, ..• . " t It •V . S. .87. :it ... ... .....1, ... .4• 4 4. O .. N. . . Z ,,,, •. q . 1.. 41* Z 4/. tt tt a m — O 0, .. ... 04.- ... ..,.. ,,,...ir„..., . ....7,,, r. t 00 : . , . LLIER CuuNTY t---- 1.kr. PI1 rillI I.1 f 1611 > 2800 N HORSESHOE EWE ,..„,,,,,*„...,m,.........,,,,..„, (") i — NAPLES Ft 34104 :77...t1F:arr 4.47;a1FE,t, .4 „ ..._,--- ...1. .... _ COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT FJJ---Wiltr..Z14.174-2-=', - A x .zi.§- ••'"' - :FT, in■ .— DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING SURVEY rz.....::::--;;;:===tvz. , I _:,.- „-, ..................................... ............ ,. , 1 DATA POINT PLOT -,...3.3:=.3m-x-,-;;-,;::,3,.. .- - OPINIINAL MUSD DATE. ;N > 0 I 0 I 0 i rn 1 5 ' 0 CAC February 23,2015 VIII-7'New Business 26 of 66 .win tiwii awwwww wiwir.ww www.a.-mewr+.w m..w.s.w..w.w!..•,t,t., ,.n,.n., S. > 1 1 m J 0 0 -I m 1 m ( 0 lis GULF OF MEXICO '( � 7 m 4. liP ilt lili 'ME II lig as to lit It lt d lt TX 11F. II 4. M: ..• rti 1 , Ni ,. 4ri 715 It akr. :a iti TIYZ 4171: := lir* It .:x It SL m at ..: co it. w I. VA '9E «� It 'It u ,may 4.. S ... tk zt . t3 3« lit .. iv': u _.. ax a it 'At is ',It. ii: 'it {p u mt. ii ,. u it z ci il III `° COIL COUNTY t l C .... ill d > 2D00 N.HORSES/40E DRIVE ..,...,.,.:........u...- .........___...__..... J NAPLES,FL 341 W . c.4 I COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT w It I DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING SURVEY 1 (11 DATA POINT PLOT """""'""""'..°""4,.."°� ton mow. r< �orrrauLSweooA�E: D m I .Mw. w.oa. �.:.1 a,m I m 0 OM MI In • ON NM MI • ME OM NM OM alli 1111. OM In MO 11.11 IIIII/ am,.0(0.0,00/011,010040•1 0.0 MN 10. ) I t11 I o I o 1 m I .1., I 0 ! ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAM 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) I ii. iR 86 8.1. `1 I ": '' 0 . 0 . ,, al g 6 o 0 ID M ■ ......-5-*) 3' g- i . " . ) • i , , g i . ; . 1 , g- i 3 ' 1 1 g. -z. , . 1, ... • ( ; . g. i- . ! ,. .:. a 108 8 . , g 1 ' 8 . ; . . „ ' M I 5..1 I , i g 1 c . - ,• I , 4, 2 i ii , ; P, §• al- ii. 8- ■ I : tu- las / ir e § 1, tr I I, • g• I i g g _ I: ; I — _ g V.--,--.. . , g' , . , 1 , g- , ta 1 •: co g• 0.. _ n " (88 OAVN)133.4 NI SNOILVA313 (89 OVEN)133.8 NI SNOLIVA313 (99 CIAVN).1.30A NI SNOILVA.313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) O ,g g g 6 0 0 .g g g 6 0 o a g 6 o o 0 ..-. ' ...1. i , ...........--- ,..„..... .'"' r. % g 1 r -- 1 c - 1 ; I 1 k 1 k _ 1 . i.. ; ,,, . I , . - : t 1 , 1, . 1 ' ....„ S I i ) ' 2g.. r-' ii4 ,} 1 1) ' /. I / e i - '' \ 1 ---/ 3 • _ i '... • , ) o4 • % t. .,. ( VI 0 i ? ' , 1 .• i t''' 8- i Lx, 8- g I i gi i I ! I • gt — I r g- : g- L• '. 1 t —.... • I --....._ \ ----t i zi --i-, -, ■ g , F g , , g 4---L 4. 0 .... • 2.. . en 0 0 g o 8 g it, 8 au " g es g 'I' " 4 (99 OAVN:1330 NI SNOU.VA313 (99 OVEN)1334 NI SNOI1VA313 (89 OVEN)1330 NI SNOLLVA313 ();) ‘0 COLLIER COUNTY 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE t-1- : -IT L, E 1 NAPLES FL 34104 =..... lizur:.4.1r,.r...r.1.. c) T.r.,-,.......z.v...-4,•=,.„•••=5,-,:r. ti) k 4 -?,ti P'' COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT 7•17i':e": = 1 " -„t-r••=°;"--r-- ;C" si , 2 g ,':1,111 —A, _ ,,i,l, ? ••,o.,....1 11 fr.. --• 4:^37-2-7-.4„:.13E64"i:-•= 'i DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS ■ WI SECTIONS-ENTRANCE CHANNEL Or.-4-- „.„ ,ORIGINAL ISSUED BATE i ) , 0 I 0 I 0 I Ii' I 11 0 NM — — MB — MINN OM r OM — — — • ON - - — MI boy-. v:,,.y.::.. ...., ,,,,. ,,.. > 1 0 i 0 i 0 I m 11 1 0 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(MVO 88) rd,O m 'd' u 'o G o o •a' ui a' - w o 1 o o o r onim 8 �� t ..— _ ' Sd R 25 §di 0 ( I co 0 i — m ... - I 1 g g g. co p g I g . r } ) 11 i _ ,, o :: i o 8 It -.41 1 d S I 8 I i •• g g} g '4 g g`- . — i - —, • 2S co a,. - 6. w - 6 0 (88 OAAVN)1334 NI SNOI1VA31?. (88 OAVN)133A NI SNOI1VA313 (99°AVN)139J NI SNOIIVA313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88, ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) N ,g u n 6, o u ,a' N o G o w •g u o co N t A A 8 g gl — $- $ g r I{ g g 0- F g iL Y Lo 8 ft. f5 1`',, ffi i 4, (4 O z§ 8 g g 8' IV K 01 1 I ; § g g d 0 0... N y c o o g :. c m -' c O il (88 GAN N1133A NI SNOIIVA313 (89 DAVN)1334 NI SNOI1VA313 199(IAVN)1334 NI SNOIIVA3T3 Er T I -- COLLIER COUNTY 6 6 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE �•••�•�••� ..H Z c 8 I - ' J NAPLES.FL 34704 w,,..,.::u._,o....:..,,..:,..:,:r _....�.-. +}ool t X_ COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT ., (r ; Ai o:.:t.:1.111 ,.,. ..,. ,•. .._... `" "°' i i DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS "" Alr SECTIONS•ENTRANCE CHANNEL D:l ....n; — ORIGINAL ........_L_.'"^-0M •`". a ortlaaui.uw8o B�Te ) m __-1 0 nw..R 0 n m I r 0 Eli - MI In MO OM all OM IMO 11.11 OM NM MO - lin - OM EMI MO ::•.4.7.::■\WIMNIO..11104-101. 1.07 alt. 4.... ) I a 1 a I a ' I M ; M i 0 i ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) I gt iel 14 8, e v. ? i'r: i; a a a ef, a a • I (0 g ti I i i 0 g? M - 1., ....... 0. ,. § ,..,.. 2.,. 0 T „-- .... 1 ,i,.-- .. ..... 8. I] , I i o o+,, 8 8 : 8 f I 4 m g g 4 g g g 1 --- ! —, g g g 1 N N • N i S 11 .• . I P * ■ i li. in 4 6' " g 4 4 6 " g 4 is 6' ° a (98 OAVN)1934 NI SNOLLVA.TIS (99 CAIN)1334 NI SNOLLWA913 (90 OAVN)133d NI SNOUVA313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88', ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET)NAV()88) a . 9,. C., a o o CR g 4 g g 1 g 1. i ti I . g 1 g I g I : 03 ..• . , ir 1 ; S- r....-- l. • . : .?- . I . 4 i • Vi n,i _ '4 i 1 . I a, i , . .• .1; W ti S'• S- a 0 g- g . g - : 04 1 1 1 , 0 a i. b'§_ " 1 _ , g , a.. ig.1 . ___, ., g 4 4 6' ° a --, c: (82 OAVN)1.334 NI SNOLLVA319 (Ge°AVIV)£384 NI SNOLLVA913 IN OAVN).1234 NI SNOILVA318 '$0 .) i I I I 1 I )111 > ...99. COLUER COUNTY MOO ti,HORSESHOE DRIVE —I NAPLES.FL 34104 NOTICC ral ..19.17=741.1=77.' =13r:r'''''''.'.." kTIO:.16.0..< 15:1SEP:EFEllt.€€Zie i * IL-'4 0 ..,■.4.001+,unune,sx............wpt...■ AL t ■, .. - § ..I X COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT -i 0 8' rn DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS rz..-44.17,-,..41-4—=,;;F-vs.. 4,„. olosam. ,,, .n.i.... r. 0.. SECTIONS•ENTRANCE CHANNEL •=f1,117,===1111=74.,f4 0141001ALIVAIIIIIDAlt: f'11 _ ___ 01 1 0 1 0 r0 1 .11 I C11 MN MI EN S MI MI In NM NM AM MN MI NM • OM = NB UM 1 :.,.. . l9 1 0 1 0 1 m I It 1 0 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAND 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAND 88) Q`Q it l u o G o w �d' a 'o G o w 'w o _t1� 0 w flS � .� m A �81 I ' E N t m M 8 $" 8; at o `-( Ai ry7 { N : �( N { Y Li 2) i 8 S e S ✓• V y V F e O o ° T t g?' S g w O °' o w l5 0 "t. 6. ° g a o' 6 o w 189 OAVN)1334 NI SNOLLVA313 (99 OAVN)133d N.SNOIIVA313 (98 OAVN)133d NI SNOLLVA313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVE(88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAND 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET INAVO 80) P ,d "' o OO o a g a o A o w g 'w o G o w W • 1 g: I g1. g` I • ;I s ffj A, g, g'- S g §y: N O 6 g U O w " O (89 OAVN)133.1 NI SNOI1VA313 (89 OAVN)1339 NI SNOLLVA313 (99 AV ONI 1339 NI SNOI1VA313 f-CDs .............. -11 t •.... COLLIER COUNTY .,, ,_ ..... A. ( 8 ill III i� > 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRMEa E•2 11 I i _i NAPLES.FL 3•104 .�• .... w A rxr.e.w w COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT M m Ky """' (�'• i g VIN DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS _ `"T '' SECTIONS-ENTRANCE CHANNEL »°""`°:,,.;;', .. ,00*WIAi O DAM: :f — D. S 0 0 .m ( 1 0 n,r.N.ww+r.MOF-sw r o.m..-.w a I m ] 0 I o I m I fl I 0 1 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 80) aO w o G o u /s in o o / u o G o u 9 m S • m Q as I 8 — a r _ • ' 8 8 8 m gi ,,,,, ...---"' 2 if 5 8- L"I 8 8- C.- g- ' 0 ✓ M _ J $- $. x g- k- )s- S g y I . . . o, . I I I o o e G 0 0 S o & a o G m (88 OAYN)133.1 NI SNOIjYAS1S (88 OAYN)133A NI SNOLLYA313 (88 DAMN)1334 NI SNOLLYA313 S N A A IJ W 2 ZA xm 9 Ng N 1 Pr O n <n 11 p y y a 1( > .... COLLIER COUNTY 11 J €E 14 ! 4100 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE d o NAPLES,FL J/1M 4 --N t -1 X COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT (1 = o a ',°,5°111111Z°° i DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS "=":=7^:".....„=4.....“1.,,-,,.....e aR . I SECTIONS-ENTRANCE CHANNEL -2°'"' _°°r a ORIGINAL ISSUED DAIS: ` ) m I 0 I .._ 0. ...�7° n m I n I o MI • • IIIMI IIIB UM MIN • UM NM INN On MIN MI MI MI MN MINI OM > . 0 I. 0 o I m I 11 I 0 ---1-- ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(18AVO 88) . . g S S 6 0 0 8 g 1 1 § 1 2' g I . g5 , g • 1 ......... ins s • g t 3 • : : e i g t • g O g : : ! S . 5. . il 1 , r i•• g --I , I) k it o Fg 0 o •I 8 If 1 . g 4. I I 8 N 1' 8 I- I : . ..• -4 m • . . P a 8 : : : . g T .. . : • . . g g g T g g : : g/ O S 8 S S '" " g S S & " 8 tee anya)139A NI SNOLLVA.313 (99 CAW j89I NI SNOLLVA313 (09(JANN)1354 NI SNOLLVA313 _ ...... ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 80 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(MAYO 88) O Oit. O 0 0 0 g 3 3 0 0 g 3 3 a g I g— 8 , 8 A 4 . . . ; g g cii g 1\ _ 1.11 i ‘ I, ! 1• i) T i . ov I 1 ,I Li) i 4) 8 8 . 8 t 1 i g g g t —• • a • g g g 1 ci i i 1 i i 1111 1 g If im I i ••-- › ' .• § '2.1 I g .• i z ;•• I I* , , 1 §i g 3 U. 0 1 4 j on anvo)400.4 NI SNOI1VA313 (010 OAVN)1854 NI SNOUVA313 198 OWN/1334 NI SNOLLVA313 > 5 0 1 i I 1 1 I 1 11 > COLLIER COUNTY 2800 N HORSESHOE DRIVE r...:=T4 ilal=t,T=MtP., AA.AAAAA,,A.A.A.A.A:AAA.A.,H, i',0i1 1 .- -+ I ‘0 2 1.14( 1 . ..., ,... NAPLES,FL 34104 ,=1 7:.•,.,T4.r.:■•=4".=Z;:- 2 I -I A COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT 1:41.772 :41 ,..** . • • • igoe:•• ."'*"7:"'"Lr'I'T'=""*""T`. k: .,. ..... . r li 1 DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS tr.:1404,,,,••=74.1,•-•4, 4.4.1.!..1.f.1 0.1......X SECTIONS•EAST CHANNEL Ez".F.:r.r.27?„.-n.,c .rx4.„ Immo.tiSUED DAM: ) 0/ 1 0 I ''''''" 0"4"''' '' 1---r0 TI 1 0 • OM • MN MN MI UM UM NM NM Mil 11.10 MI 1111. NM MIMI NM IIM/ OM .L.r.1:;ZO VO.../S.\C ad., .. I.•RI.a. T > ED , , 0 0 ! ' 1 ii I 0 - m , I ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) 6?g; 61 g g cil o ,.. it 1 Si c., . . P , :: :1 e I - /1 • A„..I _ 01 ' a 1 •,, 4 . co co 1§ f 1 k IN. II 1,- 1,1 S • • i : •••1 rs g g • co a g , 199 am/m.1.334 NI SNOLLVA.313 al ...- A A 3 i i .._ lA A A N i lir ir > ...._ li i H i 1 1 d It > ...... COLUER COUNTY 2800 N.HORSESHOE D80& NAPLES,FL 34104 411-143-7 .17.41,7AP 1.- (s. 1"3 6, , . . _ , 1 1 RI — 5.1.Z5 *--Z,7-75.77.7145Sin. COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT ....T.-.--mr,rgtr==r..... Iii E „,... DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS ,T,L.,"74-FS.,.‘„•,,, ,„,,,•=,-;:z,z,„i; ...... )A. 0Are 10 tun SECTIONS•EAST CHANNEL m'''n=.7:;aa5i"74" 7,7-- ORIG1NAL IMOD DATE: ) I 10 I 0 . rnra...,".0 1 m . . 11 I 0 •••••■....,,,..,....0,... •••gr./IN IN. > I a i o , . o , m I II : . o ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET/MVO 88) ?.53 4g ilI il 4. 0 0 OZ; 6 o 0 g. gin 4. o 0 E $ 8 ,•!. , *"" 1 I g 1 I S ? 0 • ---1.-,..., I 2 g k- 1 k t : •••••• } g f g t . II,, ...... .,..1 • i 0 i 1 C / • 7• - 1- ci, i (it M ill a a g f ... 0 § ii ii V g g g ...... ...... g g g .• .• .• .• O 1 6 ? (88 OAVN)L334 NI SNOLLVA313 (88°AWN)133J Ni SNOIIVA313 (88((MN)133i NI SNOLLVA313 -..-- . ELEVATIONS IN FEET WAVE)88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET INAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(MVO 88) . . 6, . . g g g et co 0 8 . i - . i .• .• .• .• .• k f .• .• _ • ; N 1 4 8 f g f g t , f ,....,,f _ g <I g i. ,..• is jr . •-; rr i ..• r4 : 4 .• .• .11 _. 0 • S! i 0 4. i W 0 g g I s f 2 O• g A g I g N I iv i 11 N g. a 6' , ig g in ti ' " 11 ia. 6' $ WS CAW/133a NI SNOLLVA313 (88 OAVN)133.A NI SNOLLVA313 tes OAVN).1.33a144 stouvnala c...) 5 o "' 11 ill II > ... COLLIER COUNTY ="4 2800 N HORSESHOE DRIVE ""Ittrarat===>" ''''.."*":"."'''"''''' a • :7E' iili --f ,_„, NAPLES FL 3•4104 1..a.ar•t=ZZair"•N•=tr.:=2:::. COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT 4:17,I=IIII-7. 1“..74I-I=IIIII" 4 FA NN DOCTORS.., .,2177:g":7-",.— DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS MI,'nr,,"......:=7".....k.,..Z. /1 I OM MP.. •N. SECTIONS-EAST CHANNEL I:"23":-°;:""I'arICI&I•7=':1' ...I. 01110INAL NOM DATE: ?.. f't ) 01 n I 0 —7 rn I 71 1 0 — . I.I I I 1 MI I I I I In I 111 I I I I I I I I li I I I I 0 MI MI MI I I I• I I I I ll .I I I I.I I I I I ill I. I I•I I IMI Ili. I I I MN OM Z111•4:or..a 1,101,,NN-O.. .0 I tl) I 0 I o I m i 71 I 0 ! ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAM 68) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) go . in a 6 o o g g 1 s g 8 i 0 1 — 0 I k to 0 11 g g 11 ., ....." i ., r a i A i 701 i... i s ■ 8 8 4 F ! P g g • : g f .• g g 1 g t g g i I i 1. . 1 (98 OATh).1.334 NI SNOLLVA313 (89 OAVN)1833 NI SNOI1VA.913 (99 OMN)1333 NI SNOIIVA313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVE)88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET NAVE)88) IS ei i'l in o 44 in 44 O o m ,g g g 6 o o 01 g 1 r g ■ I 1 — g g g 1 g g g f A A ill g g f ....- i ...., _ g t for" i r <-, 1 ,4 I I I i i' ' \I (4 (4 g • g i g- g g' 1 ! 0,g 1 P " 1 g P g ' g g 1 • • w i z •!'" § ■ . " 0 ' — 0 4_ 8 4 co o: g ist i'o' 6 8 LI ii 6' 19 g 6' " 0 .., 4 tot GAVIN/1394 NI SNOLLVA313 IN CIAVN)1.334 NI SNOIIVA313 (118 OAVN).1333 NI SNOII.VA313 > E° -rt i 1 1 I I I fl > ....... COLLIER COUNTY 2800 N HORSESHOE DRIVE *2',"':'1FX.2:"."' *.ai274:::"+;'.."' ' 0 1 I,: 4 1 --i ,r.,.. NAPLES FL 34104 714`,444:544;EF: :*. t ; .. COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT tr.L :77E.SIF:TE:F...ru:: I 1 - S ri i i:14 1 ipt E r4, :. . . if DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS I VI F! 74Z--.7;7 -: „„, • ' PIIIMII.P. g: I 1 SECTIONS-EAST CHANNEL :omOINAL OWED DATE: -- — (1) I 0 I 0 7 rn I '11 I 0 NM MI • MI • MI MO NM NM MO MI MI • MI MI • MN MI ME ■■■■•47...:g::ps.....4mo,ea t... .et Ia. e Es. > 1 al 1 0 ,■ 0 1 m ! 1 ! . ! ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO U) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) i . ill 11 O m . x - '2 coiM 1 : . § _ 1 DO ia § ' . i gl 1:8'I 1g. co 15 1 g g 11 , g 4 , :4 ! 74 o.. i g 15'4, ip : g 84 81 10 . I .4 IM 1 .4 g f g f' g . . . ii g t 1 g g I 1 .1 S m g , I 4. g I 1 I 8 0 0 6‘ ° ° 6 * ci■ "8 " (99 OWN)13E NI SNOLLVA313 (88 CIAVN)133.4 NI SNOLLVATI3 QM OAVN)133A NI SNOI1VA313 — --7 IP 18 A A (4 4) 1 I _ 6 A 6 w I Pl 10 1 R; i — I . , a ,' -. i.: 4 s 0 --n 11 ill 1 II > 11 .1 — COLLIER COUNTY 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES FL 34104 `4:1144,...414m 4444•4=.7444 =:A=..,..... t''''"*"'"'"nr"'"'*;:ra.'":""— =114.4:v......--=::—....t."..-: A i. 1 g ‘n N E n - 1 N i .x.-4 , ,..., . 5. k -: — COLUER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT -7-1-..:1"..x.47=e7.,==— 1;11 er: 4' . g f g`,= 1:1 "2- _-74.12712-TItyr5;-.::::::: gg )0 ..„ pl. . . 1 0 I vi DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS ......urrIZMV.1%72.17;7„C 0,K Gomm°. SECTIONS•EAST CHANNEL «. OR1001AL ISSUED DATE: ) CO 0 1:1 _____7 is 7 ____L-- 0 NM - NM en - - - - MN O I r MO all OM - NM 11111. IIIIIM 0..Ma,.4.V,.,......P,._ ...f...-.W. D I m 1 o I 0 i m !Ili ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS tN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) I /� u O iN O a w O U O N O In O P O e 88 8 1• p m • m g. g I I �e } � 8. ffi' R I Z.1 a ! i -• 8" 8 0 1 c e( t Y • ` o^ e !S^ 8+ E V ,rl V 8' 81 y $ , 1 m g' C .._........._y..._..�..o_.._._q 4...__._...... 1 1 I a' up r^ 0 a g P o 6 m o w e (98 OAVN)133A NI SNOLLVA313 (99 OAVN)1333 NI SNOLLVA313 (88 OAVN)133A NI SNOLLVA313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 881 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) N A a e G 0 ,n *3 u c+ U o u w it 8 o u p 1 1 III _ 1. T s • A A I gi s I g S, ♦N 4 G O O i T' fk g4} $- S} 2 gt ffi , g. N g1 _ _. 0 N + 0 y p � N O N w� o o n (89 OAVN)1333 NI SNOLL1/A313 (98 OAVN)1332 NI SNO11VA313 (99 OAVN)1332 NI SNOLLVA313 K n n COLLIER COUNTY t° i w 1 14I I('.1' / 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE »+• r`y "•� ( " NAPLES,FL 34104 ,„i°:,`ro°�::.r�:u"`r«;.""�uaae":"a . ............ I ,� N 1 COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT;;`:° °^'° __...,, .�."w CO O F o ,I. ' ' 11 DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS - ",-= '"�1; "" j 5 f SECTIONS-WEST CHANNEL ....," "` rk,..".,. .:. 01[ggAL MINIMDATE: CO I 0 ....�0 :.l° m lI 0 NM ME OM NM OM ..1/ MN Mill MB MN ME — NM IM NMI OM 1.1. MB OM e......6 voyestown.ment-wers so W.)1,4-k!. ) 1 m I 0 . 0 I m : . m I 0 il ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) TA , ..,. a 8 i 1 I m 1!,.4 S t m. ,I 2' u I 8 .,..... o i I ig g g to Iy -4•4 1 - V ): 'e— — 0 In I%g .-• 'il • • 1::,... . 8 .. • - • • :I'', s:, 6 6 • • , , f .4 ..., S t g.• - I . . 1 .• g • . g t • S • S . I 0 g I .g „_g, • c s, 0 . 8 (98 GAIN 133A NI SNOILVA313 (99 CINV99.1.33A Nal SNOLLVA313 (3 5 ...... --- A A V (,) J i- 2 2 z ----- O ,AT. el P z „.. ..... Cl .............. E-,, 1 1& I I I 1 I 1 11 ....4> ...-- COLLIER COUNTY 4 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES.FL 34104 "T ° "'"r"Ir"TZ-7:1"",— ..—....-ix-7,----zwrilrM, n tfil -I ■*- -4.17-7...74z-• '.' .z&,a 6.._. • ,)4 COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT 1 0 3 01 7! "'"I'"1.° WI (7.1 —.DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS F-0.7.71a•ar;-"t•IK:=4:7 AV°^", I ' i I 1 SECTIONS-WEST CHANNEL ===i...7,,it...:i.FE.4.r.t. „„ ORIGINAL NEMO DATE .‘,.„,rn u ) 0) I 0 IT 11 0 ____ MI • 1•11 NM • MI MI BIM — 1111111 • — MN MIN OM IMO MIN NM SIN > 1 m , 0 1 0 1 m I T I 0 1 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) . .fi i.; O A o a. L g g g A o 1.r. to to.ri, iti. g 1 g" 1 I 0. * ii. 1 • . Si 4 f6 i 1 g ig. • 1 g- V 0. •• 1: 0 Y 1.-4.. ,..4,,... -....... ,... ,...,..„ '4 1 ' E t g . •4 ip _ i g g i g t _ I ...... g g t 8'.... 1 g I if 0, a " 6' " (ea DAVN).1.33i NI SNOUNA313 (99 OAVN)133i Ni SNOLLVA313 (99 DAVA)1334 NI SNOIL8A313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAV°88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 98) (8 . . )ti in O 0 o . iil ii■ 0 0 at 01 –, § ,•" g I. ,. . 1 .... i A 6, A t t I t . o .1 o 1 S ° V I . 5 5, 5 . . . . S it § _ -- 1 11 . g f g 2 1 i6..1 N Ni N 1 PUI . A p g t 1 t I g g 1 1. 7.1 § . g ... ...... g.1 ...... 4 DM DAVIN)13E4 NI SNOILVA313 (92 DAVA).1.934 NI SNOI.LYAB13 (BB OAVA)1334 NI SNOILVA313 g 0 —....._ -m II ill 116 1 > COLLIER COUNTY 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES,FL 3410.1 .........Ar==rdarl.-= TATra="...4::=4"7.). . : I I-)----- i 2* '',', • ---...........--:\P -1 [..41 ;. i, 0 --- --1,-.,...,==,...„„.. ,,=.. .,..,,,,,,:=. 4 , , 1.2 1 ,,.1. ■■■ COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT 7i..76,4Z,474:: ,'•:F.:;:..4,.... '4 , "r(•,) a. •6, ii1;1,01 —tf.rr—mr=7.7 5 . I• •1"' ifI DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS tra..=.:=4...—zzrz= I t I 1.11 frztrx..0=4:4.70.1=7:- 6‘-... ORM1■111. ,„...., SECTIONS•WEST CHANNEL I i i i ='"••`"i '',`••!:. '''' ".. 'T-=‘,0 Tr))1ITZ,....*.....r. IOREENAL WINED DATE) > M I 0 ! ) M I i 1 0 110I NM • MI •1111 • • OM MI MI OM MI MB • IIIIII MN OM MIT MINI b..1..R\Ps.........Alt4101.1. Rot P.I.•.1.46. > I CO I o • 0 I m I li j o F-1-1 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAV°SI) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) I i ' 0 0 0 . g g 0 0 0 g el g it 0 i'mmo gl g [§ 61 i • g I S I m !1 li Vt gic 1 1' — -‹; 1 _ a , ..:.i fl i i I • I ,.• • o) f. . Si T M I g 1 1 ,I. I A ji ct 1...., m 1•• i ° 1,1,,I • • g '). g \s, 4 ig k •••I • g I 'IF , I I 1 gi g . g ...... 1 ...... 11 1 , g f g- g a, i . . , I La L...... .... ... . . i §:—.— .•,• .•,.. - . i g I . , • ■ g ;II g '''' " g g it 6' " COO°AVM 153.,A NI SNOLLVA313 (98 I:M.0,)133A NI SNOLIMA313 (99 OAVN)1331 NI SNOU.VA313 01 (A - - A A 61 (.4 ..._ 5 g N 1 g'. 1 g • 1 li 1 --- COLLIER COUNTY ..10 !Iii Ili > 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE -'7:tr....fr.:..c—* "2: """r".41.44'"*". $ 4:--4- --•----4-. 3 i i'! ,. ....1 ....„,.., 2 I x NAPLES FL 34104 .4.47■=7":4.:ZE:7'°«°:.*".V°745:- .74.4. •••■ ' i ■-•• .- - COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT tr. ..2 e' = •- ... . , ,__ Er,11', I i , I f DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS 7=4=7,--.677-=:xr-z;-. j''''IXA A.A 1 i li .1------4 iliiiil t/11 SECTIONS-WEST CHANNEL ='1.1.'-7.,;-,1:47,1-x:::-1--- — OR10110.1.OWED OM: • ) ED 0 =""0 7 ift li I , 0 IMIIIIIIIIIMIIIIOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMIMIINIIIIIIIPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO ■■■:■■•• e .1.....JOWNIL. .Irk a. 4 mt. > 1 co I o I o , i m I m 1 c) pr ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD IUD * i I: 2 ,^ i.,',. E■ 6 o o •f$ 4.1 ii 4. o o -rv, g 8 t ;''''' _ _ . , k i i i H , \ 1 • : . 1 0 t '1 1.4 c .• i c, f i ‘ • 4 a !, .., a. . , lc; }i ..... 4 8 8 I S t s 1 • • i t 8 t ii , EI 0 1.• ON GANN)1334 NI SNOIIVA313 (88 GAYN)133A NI SNOLIVA313 (61 DAWN)au NI SNOLIVA312 I ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) A n t 4 ea i> til o rA. ■ s 8, o N 0 wc . ti g 8 . i -• i g g i ---- t r 14 1 s § } i S. ! 1 .• . , § ' i , 1 i ._ 8 _ •I 4. . 4, § ' 1 -1 g - , 1 1 ....... . ,. k ,1 g - g r 1 ( -41 . T 0 4 _ 41 S IS- — I A gf ii ii- ,.., 1 1 s I i g I LI-- 1 f ,,.. — . . 0 0 4 lea OAVN)133A NI SNOLIVA313 (88 OAVN)133A NI SNOLLVA313 SE 0AVN)1334 NI SNOLLVA313 <51 E.7. i 1 ii 111 it :111i I > ,,,„„ COLLIER COUNTY 2600 N HORSESHOE 000/S .- -,-.-- ...7„,-- - -..-1.7' V=1"tr"'.•"" ''' 1 i TAA,.1„.......4 -1. „(.‘, rg ci il i ..1 NAPLES,FL 34104 rt.,.;..::..ra,:iV.Irri=7.::4?. ,.... •• - i (i4s es COLUER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT Stl•LS:F2Fitia..:177,''''''';,..".;;ZSZI r.1 ' 1 ta 1,,i ii3 110 Z 7Zr. 7,Z.:=1=1:::,==i■g*'-....1w", ''' ----"::■:■=,r■.:-'Xt.''te'''tr;=='7,1Nr Al j., 1 -1. 1 1 i 11 I DOCTORS PASS•MONITORING CROSS rizi111t.7:1-274!+:F.:1,FSli; .A . ,Toms i amatarren 1,7; I 1 1 i SECTIONS•TURNING BASIN tiF:', .1•7,ii6 m''':F:ZiZt',,,,,a.:F.-f'''• .-. iN10111A1.NIIIII DATE AD ) I I T1 I 0 > to , ; , , IMO IIIIIII EMI 1118 MI 111111. • MI NM NM MI MI IIIIIII IIIMII Mill MEI NMI IIIIIII MS ., . ) ( 0 l 0 i 0 I M , ------ i I ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) 1 I o o . o ' g a, its it VI g D% it, a ill . , 4.-. , m .., . m g, g 1 i g -- v, _ 0:g g t g • g a A' §3 : 1--- t 0 m 0 1 i 1 : 0 i 1 li . . i ,i' ,...... i 1 1 1 I . , k f 4 I t, ..... 4 . g • a i ii ii' 8 I i • s t § ca o , , g i . g• . . (88 OAVN)1333 NI SNOIINA313 (98(IAVN).1.22A NI SNOI1VATIS (BD DON!1338 NI SNOI1VA313 ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAVO 88) 3 , it. ii 41 o o g . . g fir D.; it a o o a DA a iss o us 01 1 I , . ,...r,', „,,, ..-, A i ! l'■ •-,,, ••; „ g • . , 'I I •: ., g • ,",„,roo 1'1 W ii W g • gi g- 1.• 1. e F j t I .i.i, . ) - ... • .1 -It, g _ 1 s s I- I s f i I .• .• .••• gi, V N t• l g I : : : : : . rs, ii 1 ii I 1 I .• .• 1 g _......... _ , S - - , . , (9e GAVN)1338 NI SNOI1VA313 (SO OAVN)1334 NI SNOUNA313 (9VOAVN)1338 NI SNOLLVA3T8 II. IS.0 —-8 COLLIER COUNTY II III > ...... 1 2800 N.H H ORSESOE DRIVE ' 22Z,F17:7-" T`r7:25.."= :=1=11:4....,,,... L A ' 1. • i ' ' -I g• ,f4 z 2 ' a a .z.t. , • ii _ __ 0 1 . NAPLES,FL 34104 .............................m.,..,-.. IS I ■ .. X COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT "(0 a.'•"A' ... . ...• IS-7,77:+17,7-;-.„-r.. ..iF....".7r,=• . --:::I - Ig:1,1: illi z ,...„. 1 , 0 I DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS :•:-."14,•tir.JF-It7==sttr4,: fliS.11. SECTIONS-TURNING BASIN .,,,.-',1: ,i„?,:.„?..J.--E...7,-,..-1,.°7=4:- „;- •• (011/GINALIIISUED OM: —1;.< .., > tO 0 i 0 7 0 11 1 0 \A . • M MI MI w MI I — MI MI I MI MI NM • M MI = N ...:.,:n,,.....RSW-$ S .0, DM III. > 1 0 o I o m I II CI I I ELEVATIONS IN FEET(NAND 88) IN 44r O Y. O U O N m C 0 i! am _ ' I; > _ I Ito .. - 0 LJ E s f. r _ rB _,..„.. I N M f. V a IS g g H o b o ON GAYN)1334 NI SNOLLYA313 (A N A A I.) S 1 a m ps i yZ ti s N r i 4 0 E t pQ ' °°' COLLIER COUNTY 0^� p..-d- b1 "a C.' E 1 11111! > 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE =73'3=113=1132,,==.11.-: . 'y d 888 I NAPLES,FL 34104 �` o N In, 1 {p X COLLIER COUNTY MONITORING PROJECT _ »�•. P� ' c s CI On _ V ? b C ,Sil �,�. �i u. I 11 i DOCTORS PASS-MONITORING CROSS „,,,;,,,,,!---- ,, .�,;— --- r SECTIONS-TURNING BASIN `""'"""° '^"'°'"""" _.........__. °`"""" .a..,. ...wee.„,,...,,a w.w.w.:.vr d' ;ORRNNAI ISSUED DATE: > a 0 'm I 1 I 0 CAC February 23,2015 I VIII-7'New Business 44 of 66 I Appendix B IDisposal Area Profiles I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I .� 1 _. _a I N N _i I (h Ut 0 Ui O CT O (T O (T 00 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I N O I O — ,_— — I N O I O - O I O I O - O O F : ' p c I D CD s< (.7i - - ;X I (0 O I ID CTI 171 co> O �` O O N _ O _ —I yr (D O cp -o U1 - O N O O N Iv cri O W I o O G) N — cn i T O v (D 6 W V1 — — A O cny - O p 3 N co o) v N O — O O-I O W 0 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) i � i N Ut O Ut O Ul O U1 0 1 I I I I J 0 - I O - O I U1 — — O I / I O I J I J U1 — I O CT I ES N C fD• ° -0 C D o O -- � � N Qa• ° cn 0 ' 'U D 0 0 CD O -D W Cn — ° A I O — —1 O A Ut — O O al _ i O v a O m - O O 3 N N O CO J U1 — N O O O N O_ C.) 0 I I I 1 1 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) i 1 I N N _, I cn Cn O cn CD cn O cn O 01 0 I I I I I I I 1 I N cn — _. 0 I O — 1 N U1 — 0 1 o — —1 0 v I cn — — 0 o — C. iii 10 N 0 o a 00 — vs E, 0 Cu =* cn N N ` — 0 O N I 01 _ — O 0 N 1 0 W 1 O ,_ c) 0 W I 01 -' ~ — T O V (D Q W o V y 0 O 7 O 0, if 0, r - IV O o o K) O W o I I I I I I O 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I - — 1 — J i.)cri O cn O cn O Cn Qo I 1 I I I 1 I cn — — 0 1 Q — — Q I cn _ — 0 I a — + — o 1 I J Q - _ Q 1 I CT — , H Q D r o_ ru N DD Q -, O O °y 7 N I C0 O - X O I O a O w y— Q — —' co O co cn I w Q A i O - - O 1 cn — — O t U I O - - O cn I C71 - 1l O i c T — _ A Q co N•Q 0 5 O O) Q co J cn — N O O O N 0 Co) I I I I I a Q Elevation (ft NAVD88) i I , i i cri CN71 O (J O O C11 O (71 ©O I I I I I I I N 1 O I O — — N I CT — — O I O• — — O v I (.3) - - O _ 1 0 0 N _ -, I O '? 0 I q1 ` — co 1 ' - N U n 13 O D j o O v ° _ m K = U1 - 17 (0 o 1 O o I o N O O © - u1 O _ N cn N N _ U1 . O N 111 O O N I U1 O W I O _ — O O W N CJ1 - -T a O 1m * W O . g N (n Cr, [b -). V _ N O _ CP O O N- O A -. W o I I i I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I — J I 1 J iv cm cn o c ■ a cn o ' I I I I I i a 1 1 -J a ^ - a 1 0 I a - - I O - 1 I o - _ a I 0 Id I D N _ -' { o Cn O O — — CO CD O '13 N I CO W cm - - 0 1 0 -1=, _ J I o c 1 o _ 0 cm I o - „ I O O y - a 3 8 cy, /m Vt ^ IV O - 0 O N 0 W i~o I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I N N -I I -� (nu) O 01 O (71 O Ut O CT o I I I I I I I f N O O — — N O o• - r' O 1 O O i r J N — O o o W (n — - 0• O n D o 0 4 v + _ m (0 o 73 0 0 0 O N O O _ Zei N ': Cu .� N N N _ _ cn O N C Il J7 O O iv v — _ 01 0 W iO _ _ 0 O Cr) N _ _ CJ1 O m Q co cn O r v' a O m O 3 N W Oa V „_ (V O _ o II O N O A -• W i o I I l I I l I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 1 N[n O Cn O Cn O Cn 0 I 1 1 1 I J I cn — o 1 ■ CD - - CD I I CTI _ _ I O - - O 1 Cn ~ - O Q f" o T 0 n 0 D ° .-» co 0 1 0 0 i rn 0 0 0 — w c) oo — w N W O IO - - O A ICn - - O 1 IO — — O Cn U1 — — * Q O I N y _ o No rn rn O N O O N -+ O O . I 1 I I I w O Elevation (ft NAVD88) N N - t I (1 CT O 01 O CT O 01 O CT o I I I I I I I N 1 UI - _ O I O - - N 1 G'1 - - O i C III J, O - O / 1 O O - O O N _ CT O ci> ii O N O — - °' in CD 00 N N N _ U, C N III CJt - _ O O N v _ CT O Cr) O - O - O Cr) N U1 _ o V fD * 6 ai CJ o O Wv, - O g' N CA Cr.) c.,V CO CT - N O O O N O A --, W I00 I. I I I I I I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I J J i J J N cn o to o cn O cn °o I I I I I 1 cn — — 0 I o — — 0 cn _ _ I 0 I o - - c _ _ I 0 o — — 0 1 cn — — 0 o ly N 0 mgr 1 — 13 . C o0 D FlY 0 O N Xr-Z cn• ° o a C.) o CC O_ CO a T w N CA C.) cn — — 0 0 i cn — i — o , cry o — _ I 0 Icn — _ o VCD * a li a) o — _ cry lit O 3 N g If O N O . O N 4. O_ W O I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) II N N I _. Cn Cf1 O cn o Cn O cn O Cr O I I I I I I I I N CT — O I O — — N '--, I CP - - Cn 1 O - - O iK U1 r- - 0 j 1 O CI . N O �. O 1 C CD O z D• -' ='"C C.0 c) _ 7 .D rn o O N O -++ v N N N cn N ,- U1 - O N Ul 0 O _ - 0 N - i V U1 — O W O 0 W — N C11 _ o N 1.- r Q W CT1 ,_ O _ C)1 it O N CD 0 cp W y 0 II til 0 O N -- 0 A -+ W O I I i I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I N CJi 0 CT 0 CA 0 CT Oo I I 1 I 1 1 I ...a Cfl — — O 1 I O O 1 I Ul _ O I Q — — cri _ _ I O j I O _ . c> 1 O C) I O iti ET • NJ r- / _ n Q ' n CD -Ci O I E N O G Z °I — CD on O / .77 I 0 Q 0 Ca O CD O - to N co O ■ O• - O O I 0 O - O Cri O — M m 6 / Q) Q / — y O C Q ! N co CY)it O II N O O N p 0 - I 1 1 1 W Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I I I N ccif Cn N) o v, o cn o cp o I I I I I I I I 1 N O II 0 — _, N) CA — - — O I O I cn — — O 0 1 O _ O r I N — CT — O O I U7 • Ut t; N• O 8 O 6D I O 7 O ---1 ` = U1 — — I I CL) O Cr) 0 ON — — O c� o CD C N N — <n — O N cry I O -' O N - U th V O C.4 i O O _ _ O W — N CT _ = 0 ■ N +a c..) O — — v O a) CO — Ut N O O O N O W 0 1 I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I 1 1 I N U'i O C.n O C) O Cal 00 I I I I I 1 i [n - - O I O CT) — — O I O — I C1 - - O 1 O C.n — — O 0 `r 0 o I Sv N r �. z o n CD O O U C I > CD O NJ 20'' - Ca O CI) p A O O O — — CO , CD O c I co co Cn — — O O — — O Cn — — O Cr i I O - — O CA o —m Q a) O - O co m - O j' N (A 0> J O N O _ O N -I. O_ C.) 0 I O Elevation (ft NAVD88) 1 I 1 I NJ CJ I01 O c .n o (.7% O cn O J o I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 N Cn — — O I O — — N ' cn — O • I co O I— ! — O v Cn - - O O ,- O - O N r cn — O f O N _, — r� n• O 0 CD O O I _ G D , c� n ca• O CA O 'D + O 03 0 I O N O CD O O cn N N ,- (n O N Cn — O — O N cn I O W O O — — O W I N O W O c0 y _ O j� N co o) J O O N 1 O W 0 I I I I I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I N Cn 0 Cn O Cn O Cn 0 I I 1 ( 1 o I o Ii ..... - 0 1 cn _ _ 0 I o — — 1 o — j o 1 01 — — 0 i 0 1 v o fD O — CD• O O 0 (D 1 O N _ X • O I O CO + 1 n O O ♦V V U I C...) cn — — 0 ■ A i 0 — 0 0 1 cri 1 cri I +a 0 O — _ o ca o o 0) rn 0 Cn — N o O O N A -.4 i I I I I w O 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) II I t t Ui ccn o n O cn o cn o cn oO I I I I 1 I I 1 N CFI — — O I O - _ N 1 Q I O - - O i ' f I O I 0 _, O - O r N _ Ii co o 7 0 O I � N C7 O N O o -- — (53(D 0 13 . . N N N _ _ CT O N 0 - O 0 N _ - Il CP 0 CO 0 i o - 0 0 W _ N — co co - T J lD a Q G) CA OO w W O 5 N 0) CO o - 0 0 0 A c 1 w 0 I I 1 I 1 1 I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) iv cn o cn o u, a cn 00 I I 1 I I 1 J 0 I O _ _ o 1 In _ — 0 I O _ _ 0 1 I 0 j o ^ J _ O co 0 Q D N = 0 0 — — (IT- t O N O WO — _ N 5" O -0 Q t N Ln co cn — _ O 4 I O Cn — — I 0 i / I cn O — — O cn , o V N fIf � i O ` N y W o 55 ) a) if a) cn — iv O -- O O N .a 0 A W ✓ I I 1 I I 0 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I I I N _.-+ - I -+ U1 U) O (Ti O U1 O U1 O U1 00 I I I I I 1 I 1 N O I O — 1 N O • 1 O — — O V O O O N O N O n O ' 0 o 1 0) 3 O O N W O _ O — _ F a) O O N — N CT 0 N O N _ 01 _ O O N - 1 y O c...) II O - O - O W N U1 O vm . Q W O w w o a) i rn W co (A _ N O O O N J 0 A W 1 o I 1 1 I I 1 1 O Elevation (ft NAVD88) I ',Jul o cn o cn o CP 00 I I 1 I I I i cn — — 0 1 o — — 0 1 CP 0 I o - - 1 o - 1 0 - - 0 1 cn — — 0 o FY o — — m = o o I D 3 ° N CO WO 0+ - O — — CJ (D O .D DJ to co cn 0 o — 1 O A 1 — — 0 CT I o — — O cJt . CJI - - - Tt O -4 m i ii- 1 0 O - _ A�./ W O = O CD 1 0) I a) N O ^ O O N J C] A C CO V 0 I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) I i i I N N -+ -+ I -a -+ u,CP o cn 0 cn 0 01 0 01 p0 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 N Cl, - - O I O - - N O £ V, 1 p — i 1 CP — t — O 1 O — — O J 1 N - i - cn O 0 , 0 _. o I u J rt, W Ut - 0 O n o -c D o � - ,.c co O — x O .OA - j E O -ID N N.) W N - U, O N I CJ, - O - O N I V - O W 1 O p - O W N - U, - o (D • Q W Cn o 5 N o5 t(.4 o) T, C N p 0 O N -+ O A -) ' W 0 I I I I I I I 0 Elevation (ft NAVD88) 0 cm o oil o cn o (.71 0 I I I I I I cm — — 0 1 o 1 crt I o ,- - a _ I I O J 0 0 cn p cp 7 4J C D o = I IV -'`G i cn O X -. W p Co CD 0 m W cm _ 0 A 1 O A 1 Cm — — 0 cm 1 o — _ 1 V (D * 6 it a) 0 r -y W O N O N O W o o N i 0 A () 111 W o I I 1 1 I 0 CAC February 23,2014 VIII-7'New Business 1 of 10 I Survey Procedures/Quality Control Plan Collier County Doctors Pass 2014 Bathymetric Monitoring Survey August 2014 1 I. Offshore Profiles a). Horizontal Positioning IThe horizontal positioning for the hydrographic survey relied upon Real-time Kinematic GPS. ' Morgan&Eklund, Inc. utilized our 26' Parker survey vessel,Trimble SPS 852 Real- Time Kinematic GPS receiver,Odom CVM Digital Survey Fathometer,TSS Motion Compensator and Hypack Navigation Software for data collection. Our firm has extensive land and hydrographic survey capabilities, experienced personnel and specialized equipment necessary to perform this extensive survey in a timely,cost 1 effective manner. Calibration of the fathometer(depth sounder) involved adjusting for vessel squat and settlement while underway,vessel draft,and the speed of sound in water. (bar check)Both analog and digital fathomer readings were calibrated at the beginning and end of each survey day. ' b). Soundings Prior to the start of the hydrographic survey,the survey fathometer was calibrated using a"bar check". A metal plate was suspended by cables in the water column below the fathometer transducer at varying depths giving a reading on both the analog chart and digitizer. This absolute depth was used to calibrate the fathometer for speed of sound in that particular body of water, since the depth displayed will be affected by the density of the water,(i.e.,temperature, salinity,turbidity,etc.) c). Water Surface Elevations Water surface elevations were measured by RTK/GPS. A tide staff was also set in the survey area which was monitored during the bathymetric survey. The tide staff serves as a check on vertical accuracy of the Real-Time Kinematic and as a back-up to the RTK/GPS tide file. All leveling, and bathymetric surveys conform to the FDEP specifications,the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrographic Survey Manual and the Florida Minimum Technical Standards. I 1 1 I CAC February 23,2014 ' VIII-7*New Business 2 of 10 1 1 Vertical Control: a) Elevations for the ebb shoal bathymetric survey relied on Real-time Kinematic tide files and were verified with a tide staff set near Harbour Drive Bridge and Morning Bay(See attached field book Collier 15 page 59 for sketch. (elevation 3.16 NAVD88) ' Staff installations, leveling and bathymetric surveys conformed to the FDEP specifications and the Florida Minimum Technical Standards. ' The fathometer was calibrated at the beginning and end of each survey day using a"bar check"to compensate for variations of the speed of sound in water together with the calibration of the vessel for squat, settlement, and draft. I I I I I I I I 1 2 CAC February 23,2014 I VIII-7*New Business 3 of 10 I Id). Offshore Data Collection 1. The survey boat was navigated along each transect using the steering indicator I in Hypack and the coordinates and depth soundings were simultaneously collected every 20 feet along the profile line 2. Our digital survey fathomer collected readings to the nearest 0.1 foot. The I resultant accuracy of the bottom elevations (i.e., from leveling to staff, staff accuracy,positional accuracy,and sounding accuracy)should be within±0.5 foot as stipulated in the FDEP specifications I III. Data Reduction/Plotting/Drafting 1. The bathymetric survey data is stored in xyz format by Hypack Navigation I Software and was downloaded onto a CD at the end of each survey day. All of the water surface elevations are referenced to NAVD 88 and those tidal stage elevations were used to reduce the soundings to bottom elevations. The I entire survey data set was plotted by x,y coordinates(NAD 83/90)and bottom elevations,z,(referenced to NAVD 88) in plan and profile views. I I I I I I I 1 1 2 I CAC February 23,2014 I VIII-7'New Business 4of10 ... A - s ' .. Imo '.. t * k = ' a~ t 1Y II ^" =yam': i, GULF _ .;_ . , II OF t - *,, . _____ si w MF;XI CO .•- ,, � III , i .. \®' r , UNE NUMBER (TYPICAL) 44•. •' ' � 0 Elk e . \ 0 °' r , . '+, � ... . 15t ; 04 ao , •jii-L I \\ \\ 411P: vs"11'n C.'' ' .4.',:------ ' -.'.co \\\ 1 \; f/✓✓ •\\ \ -, - S. aa, E :,..1%:.,F.Lit:t .4 AS.,"...-..„..„.......________ :4„:::„......:.,,fr, -.. 1:-. 44..1, ,,,,, :4:,/si" . , . .0 . `f t ''^F'..-- e .. ""1e r Y°' .. '4.,,,, A AWN, .yea ' i/ 1 MORGAN& EKLUND, INC. SURVEY UNE LAYOUT 5565.06 PROFESSIONAL SURVEY CONSULTANTS — FOR ma e74a Her�� HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY OF WIGGINS PASS r .. P.O.sox 1420 1159 SW 1ST 10r COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA to/17/14 al AS50, ly 32970 DEEME1D 9EICH,ft 33441 I ,2,'''„ PHONE: 2)36D-S3d1 RgNE:((964)421-6662 aw w awaa s wea 4m[ svr v waver FAX:(772)366-3165 iAX:(954)421-0425 wo 1 a 2 tB�429e CAG JFEM Mr,a 8/27/14 I CAC February 23,2014 II VIII-7*New Business 5of10 I I ILINE # NORTHING EASTING BEARING LINE # NORTHING EASTING BEARING 1 669988 388082 S18°59'26'E 40 671533 389778 N90°00'00'E 2 670006 388181 S18°59'26"E 41 671603 389783 S85°59'44'E II 3 669988 388293 518°59'26"E 42 671691 389780 585°01'14'0 4 670021 388388 S18°59'26"E 43 671778 389793 S85°00'40"E 5 670095 388468 S18°59'26"E 44 671865 389785 S86°00'04"E 6 670161 388551 S18°59'26"E 45 671952 389778 S87°02'06"E II 7 669814 388756 S19°59'52'0 46 672039 389805 S87°01'24"E 8 669829 388815 520°58'37'0 47 672125 389822 S87°00'30"E 9 669834 388887 S17°02'05"E 48 672213 388833 S87°02'44'E 10 669865 388978 514°00'25'E 49 669307 390269 S64°02'14'W 669886 389076 S13 5917'E 50 669339 390263 S67°5703W Ill 12 669904 389175 S13°59'19'0 51 669371 390264 S76°59'30"W 13 669931 389271 S13°59'52"E 52 669423 390272 S79°00'36"W 14 669942 389348 S20°00'50'0 53 __ 669443 390264 S75°59'27"W 15 669958 389394 525°58'16'E 54 669505 390285 S71°59'33"W 16 669982 389445 S26°00'42'0 55 669630 390393 S62°59'37"W 17 670034 389531 S26°01'22"E 56 669670 390245 556°59'33'W 18 670079 389621 525°58'39'0 57 669699 390146 S64°00'39"W 19 670111 389683 S25°59'23"E 58 669757 390119 S71°00'22'W I 20 670004 389686 S75°00'22"E 59 669834 390084 S72°58'35'W 21 670126 389737 S66°59'42"E 60 669907 390082 S84°59'13'W 22 670183 389824 867°59'05'0 61 670180 390152 N68°00'35"W 23 670224 389868 S67°58'44'E 62 670211 390167 N68°00'58'W 24 670272 389879 N84°59'21'E 63 670247 390187 N68°00'13"W II 25 670321 389871 N83°00'04"E 64 670322 390227 N67°58'57'W 26 670365 389858 N75°00'24"E 65 670357 390214 N67°08'46'W 27 670434 389836 N71°00'10"E 66 670422 390256 N66°58'48"W 28 670506 389809 N71°00'36'E _ 67 670487 390298 N66°59'54'W II 29 670595 — 389828 N72°00'36"E 68 670585 390307 N66°01'14"W 30 670609 389792 N80°02'21"E 69 670670 390366 N73°57'50'W 31 670685 389785 N87°58'04"E 70 670735 390382 N81°00'39'W 32 670785 389774 N88°01 '06"E 71 670796 390393 N81°00'46"W 33 670885 389773 N87°59'48"E 72 670856 390403 N81°00'19"W II 34 670985 389785 N88°01 '05"E 73 670916 390416 N80°56'28"W 35 671073 389774 N88°59'47"E 74 669882 389926 N21°59'53"E 36 671172 389764 N90°00'00"E 75 669922 389878 N22°00'12"E E 37 671270 389766 N90°00'00"E 76 669961 389829 N21°59'48"E I g 38 671367 389760 N90°00'00'0 77 669984 389773 N21°59'33'0 39 671465 389764 N90°00'00"E * s II II 3 MORGAN& EKLUPD, INC. SURVEY UNE LAYOUT ss�aoe I 2 PROFESSIONAL SURVEY CONSULTANTS — FOR w Q745 US 1w7nwr p HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY OF WIGGINS PASS �" 500 t PA.800(1170 11'30 A0 1ST 887 wagso,►� 37070 omYlFto FL 33{{, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA 10/17/14 ,..9... PNO81 ) PIg1E( {71-0!!2 FAX(777)310-3106 04208 FNL•(0.5'1)421-0425 JRIIw rem ma I 8127/14 tow 2 s 2 LB CAC February 23,2014 VIII-7*New Business 6 of 10 1 I Doctors Pass 2014 Bathymetric Monitoring Survey Collier County August 2014 I I hereby certify that this survey meets BBCS technical specifications for beach erosion control projects and Florida Minimum Technical Standards of Chapter 5J-17. F.A.C. 1 John Morgan. II Morgan& Eklund, Inc. � '/�,-,' PLS #3520 1 1 1 1 1 I I CAC February 23,2014 II VIII-7*New Business 7 of 10 II DOCTORS CONTROL TABLE.TXT 1 NAD 83/90 SPCS 0901 NAVD-88 NORTH MONUMENT STATION NORTHING FASTING ELEVATION AZIMUTH STAMPING R-60+518 000 666166.80 390291.60 275° NO MONUMENT SET R-61+408 000 665240.50 390438.00 ---- 275° NO MONUMENT I SET R-61+816 000 664832.50 390438.00 ---- 275° NO MONUMENT SET A-11 --- 676453.59 388667.14 5.77 64-78-All I R-52 --- 675291.90 388834.00 5.72 R-52 COLL. CO. 73 u-55 672131.10 388974.60 7.13 U-55 COLL. Co. 1979 II T-57 --- 670447.60 389142.00 1.51 T-57 COLL. CO. 78 R-60 666685.10 390145.20 4.67 R-60 COLL. CO. 73 315 --- 672206.40 389862.37 14.05 PK NAIL & I DISK LB 4298 316 669991.91 389035.15 6.13 5/8" REBAR & CAP LB 4298 317 --- 669925.74 389034.90 8.95 5/8" REBAR & II CAP LB 4298 342 --- 666148.16 390146.76 7.36 5/8" REBAR & CAP LB 4298 343 --- 666137.25 390166.74 5.39 5/8" REBAR & I/ CAP LB 4298 II II II 1 I II II I Page 1 I 1 0 , _YY O N. N C O 7 y 00 (J f 1r i :) 1 I 6 ii- i I 1-f) L 0 ,0 ' k -P-) 1 &". i I 1 . 1 •1 1 w A. - • . - - • - - • - . - - • • -, v — 1 p ' a) (1\L1• o v 8' g 1.P- 9 W ‘B. i - . i ri i lo v3 r Urn- 8 - --1-A — ---- c �9 �,) LJ c0 ( �l c.f m c� D (6 �� a . z 1- Go.. t... ,-. rte_) �) 7 �- � �� = N u I . .3 4 4- 11 J J t c7—)- z•—) (.) I E 1 I ..,0 1 --II i ' . ) _ g,„ ., C•1 .0 0 1 4_ 1 sc1 C. • iii LL -L n Iii.' ‘11,... . • 0) I ) 7 • -•'-' ,..i . j . _ r- I I -. o (5) 00 1-__ v. 0 ,j-- (-'0 Po r4 N Ci N (N t•i j_. I V ;-'1 `.1 [..■ Nd ,-- C.1 '4- 6 —J Ci ,- 11-. ■,..) --- I ....•..-. ..•... I ./ - 1 — 111 U C, .--- 0 'Cl n if tn, I , . 0 u. -4 , - r, — — c'■ I . r f if p t.f. 6, if n 0 if •-•,?)' t't q f n ., — r '; CI, 0 t 0 ) I LO `') €' . — • —- — • • J (.,...._, 0 0 I S9 t: ' 2 t4 j . ! r■ , , ... •,_ •. ■ , tjj 0 r.) (' CM i 1 " 4 '''-. -A -‘7'' • rP 1:4,1 , Lc 5..,(1_: ,..) .) ,- ,, , •. I ---1 .,_ s-.' .f. (1 ) il _ 0 or, 4. i(,) 6\ l•--:- ',..S1 ip fkl... (-) , r\ — 0 ‘,(1 .i k) LI . )2-- ' I I 1-- i) , , , ._ t- r rl ij — 11 \j `-1 ‘ 1 '1 I) ° if 2 '? - _ t, ,z4 0. __:. 0...,, ,_ c■: - LI. _ . . .• - . . :. CI (' I r:',, 4.‘, ,;-. i' .4-, ':-.) 6.', (7) (7) '3 ,.) _ _ _ . .._ — — _ __. ...._ '------ ' — — I I1) cA o a) (NJ .c a) u_ _4 / • e 1 1 CAC February 23,2015 IX-1 Old Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY-2015/16 LGFR Update and FDEP Project Ranking OBJECTIVE: Review and discuss the FY-2015/16 LGFR update and FDEP's project ranking of Collier County projects CONSIDERATIONS: FDEP issued the results of the FY-2015/16 local government funding requests—Beach Management Funding Assistance Program on January 22, 2015. The Collier County beach renourishment project to renourish a beach segment of either the Vanderbilt, Park Shore or Naples beaches with approximately 50,000 cy's of sand and based on current FDEP criteria ranked 16 out of 40 beach projects throughout the state. Collier request $1,526,035 from the state to partially fund this project. Based on Governor's Scott proposed budget of $25,800,000, Collier County will not receive funding this year. The legislator will need to authorize approximately$32,000,000 to fund Collier's project this year. The South Marco Project was submitted and requested $111,905 in state cost share funding. It ranked 22 out of 40 projects and will require the legislator to fund approximately $51,000,000 to receive funding. Staff has contacted our state lobbyist to assist in additional legislator funding, Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association is also engaged in securing additional state funding. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: For review only. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: N/A RECOMMENDATION: To review and discuss the FY-2015/16 LGFR update and FDEP project Ranking. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachments: FDEP Ranking Document DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Water Resource Management Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Fixed Capital Outlay Local Government Funding Requests Fiscal Year 2015-16 January 22, 2015 \\\ IFVE(TIONw ; .:. g- FLORIDA S FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Fiscal Year 2015-16 Local Government Funding Requests TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Beach Restoration and Nourishment Projects 5 Beach Restoration and Nourishment Projects Table 6 Inlet Sand Bypassing/Inlet Management Plan Implementation Projects 10 Inlet Sand Bypassing/Inlet Management Plan Implementation Projects Table i 1 Post-construction Monitoring 12 Beach Management Projects Venice Beach Segment/Sarasota County Shore Protection Project 13 Duval County Shore Protection Project 14 Walton County Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Project 15 Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project 16 Brevard County Shore Protection Project/North&South Reaches 17 Broward County Shore Protection Project/Segment III 18 Blind Pass Ecozone Restoration Project 19 South Amelia Island Beach Nourishment Project 20 Long Key/Upham Beach Groin Replacement 21 Longboat Key Beach Nourishment 22 Charlotte County Beach Restoration 23 Nassau County Shore Protection Project 24 Jupiter Island Beach Nourishment 25 North Boca Raton Segment-Palm Beach County Shore Protection Project 26 Anna Maria Island Cortez Groins Replacement 27 Collier County Beach Nourishment 28 Bonita Beach Nourishment 29 Navarre Beach Nourishment 30 South Siesta Key Beach Nourishment 31 South St. Lucie County Beach Restoration 32 Broward County Shore Protection Project/Segment II 33 South Marco Island Beach Nourishment 34 South Boca Raton Beach Nourishment 35 Central Boca Raton Beach Nourishment 36 Hallandale Beach Nourishment 37 Juno Beach Nourishment 38 Mid-Town Beach Nourishment 39 Bathtub Beach/Sailfish Point Beach Nourishment 40 Brevard County Shore Protection Project/Mid-Reach 41 Flagler County Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Project 42 Phipps Ocean Park Beach Nourishment 43 Perdido Key Beach Restoration 44 Rest Beach Nourishment 45 Marathon Beaches Nourishment 46 South Ponte Vedra/Vilano/Summer Haven Beach Restoration 47 Key Biscayne Beach Nourishment 48 Coral Cove Park Dune Nourishment 49 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Fiscal Year 2015-16 Local Government Funding Requests TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd) Southern Palm Beach Island Restoration SO Vero Beach Restoration 51 Regional Monitoring S2 Inlet Management Projects Port Canaveral IMP Implementation 53 Lake Worth IMP Implementation 54 Longboat Pass IMP Implementation 55 St. Lucie IMP Implementation 56 Port Everglades IMP Implementation 57 Ft. Pierce IMP Implementation 58 South Lake Worth IMP Implementation 59 Sebastian IMP Implementation 60 Boca Raton IMP Implementation 61 Venice IMP Implementation 62 Big Carlos Pass Inlet Study 63 Southwest Gulf Coast Regional Inlet Study 64 3 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Fiscal Year 2015-16 Local Government Funding Requests INTRODUCTION Florida is dependent on its 825 miles of sandy beaches fronting the Atlantic Ocean,Gulf of Mexico and Straits of Florida for storm protection for public infrastructure and private upland development.the enjoyment of its residents and non-resident tourists and boosting the state's economy.Critical habitat for many species,including many that are endangered and threatened,is also provided along the state's sandy shoreline.Each state dollar spent protecting Florida's beaches with widespread public access prevents the loss of$8 in state taxes paid by out-of-state tourists and resident users of Florida's beaches(Florida Atlantic University,2003). Florida's beach management program, pursuant to Chapter 161,Florida Statutes(F.S.),the"Beach and Shore Preservation Act",provides for a variety of local government-sponsored erosion control activities (e.g.,feasibility and design studies,construction of erosion control structures and engineered sand placement and post-construction monitoring to document project performance and potential impacts). Restoration involves the initial placement of sand to rebuild a beach that has been severely eroded. Beach nourishment,or periodic maintenance.places sand on previously restored beaches at specific intervals based on project performance in order to maintain original design intent,such as storm protection, recreational beach area and habitat enhancement. Inlet management and inlet sand bypassing is also critical to account for the disruption of sand transport along the shoreline caused by dredging and stabilization of inlets. Pursuant to Sections 161.091, 161.101. 161.143 and 161.161. F. S.,the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(DEP) is charged with developing and implementing a comprehensive,long- range statewide beach management plan. DEP has developed, in coordination with local sponsors and the United States Army Corps of Engineers(USACE),a Strategic Beach Management Plan(SBMP), Long Range Budget Plan(LRBP)and annual inventory of beach erosion control projects proposing activities for FY 2015-16. The SBMP adopts strategies for erosion control activities along critically eroded beaches and inlets. Projects must have a clearly identifiable beach management benefit consistent with the SBMP to be eligible for state funding assistance. DEP currently designates 407.3 miles of sandy shoreline as critically eroded. Since 1998,when the Florida Legislature dedicated a portion of the Ecosystem Management and Restoration Trust Fund for beach management,$626.6 million has been appropriated to cost-share with local governments on local and federally authorized projects,with each level of government contributing about one-third of the cost of the entire program.This has resulted in the restoration and subsequent maintenance of more than 227.8 miles,or nearly 56 percent,of the state's critically eroded beaches. The funding requests for FY 2015-16 consist of 57 projects which total nearly$101 million.The prioritized list of beach erosion control projects is organized in two sections:"Beach Restoration and Nourishment Projects"and"Inlet Sand Bypassing/Inlet Management Plan Implementation Projects." Each section contains a list of eligible projects ranked in priority order, based on the authority in Sections 161.101 and 161.143,F. S.,and the procedures outlined in Chapter 62B-36. Florida Administrative Code. Projects have been evaluated by DEP for consistency with the SBMP, permitting status,readiness to proceed with the proposed funding phase and the appropriateness of the amount of funding requested. 4 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Fiscal Year 2015-16 Local Government Funding Requests BEACH RESTORATION AND NOURISHMENT PROJECTS, DEP has developed a multi-year repair and maintenance strategy to implement the state responsibilities for a comprehensive, long-range statewide program of beach erosion control. including beach restoration, nourishment and storm protection.The principles of this strategy are to: • Maximize the infusion of beach-quality sand into the coastal system; • Implement projects that contribute most significantly to addressing the state's beach erosion problems; • Extend the life of beach restoration projects and reduce the frequency of nourishment; • Encourage regional approaches to ensure the geographic coordination and sequencing of projects;and • Reduce equipment mobilization and demobilization costs. The funding requests for 45 Beach Restoration and Nourishment Projects(Beach Projects)for FY 2015- 16 total more than$91 million. Projects are presented in the following order: • Post-construction monitoring list; • Beach Restoration and Nourishment Projects;and • Regional Monitoring. Projects have been evaluated by DEP and ranked in priority order.The descriptions of the proposed projects are based primarily on information provided by local governments. Funding eligibility and state cost share are calculated individually for each project based on the public access,as defined by program rule, but have yet to be field verified. A summary funding table of the beach restoration and nourishment projects, in priority order as described above, is provided herein. 5 O N I1 l If) WI t".- M e M M ar NN•N OC M N N OC t•-- t-- co C r. C Cl. OC N I N t' Or �t ."+ AD 2 E.. ,t Vf, N_ M M N ON O, t7 M ..r v. g a. 0N0 V' O ^ .-r '.p N OC _ « N M T!' 1 kr, V7 Cf. V) vi e C o• f V ci I.. ... .•+ .r .r rr N u I a _ c N- C r• O O O O O O O `1 O O O O ^ N- n O O C O eQ cc (°;'. fir n o tr C4. 0 M a N '-0 C N c 0' O 60 C N O M y, j- N -- M (N EA '.t M i 69 -^ 64 iC 69 69 x-0, 64 6`4 -0 V'. Y 3 w e, rd O• co co 00 !J co co X- ,Zr v, � v, O r r- C N O c o -7 r, co C N- v C ice, 5 — Z = N 0 N 47 O t O O N .D y' = O O N 00 '.p O 00 -� .`= c a Cr in r^ --- M 69 69 -7 7 J 69 69 r1 6R c o`v: c U W c g C" ti) - .-+ 100 O O N �D O O C 6 v -0 C O N 'et cos C �t� x O M C s+ - _ ^z i y C4 os c� 00 a; O N O 4::'.• v� „F. c. Isn ° o. :: *UP C I'-c C C ON C 4-- _ s z- Ca OC O 'N N C M O' 'Q . 'O ° -u t CO• L F-. 4 • .�. 1 N � .r 6A 40) — I pv $ Q Z N .4. 6f) O ER 69 E/4 •} b e.4 c S ZV dG W 6R bR i r 44 x - a: d T' O` Ors O C O O O O O C " c 2 ° ►r — r N .O b4 64 Tt 64 44 t 6 o c Z v 'Ed' ^a ,0 r -- ". C o c 00• c 5 Z 6y M bn9) t--` 64 • w :a .,w Z 1 L 0 H) 65 o S N .,Y s O Q G Z.' O R u '-•'-i E,c C r C Z i. rA ✓ C Cr 9 0 C O O yt , G C to � L• \O r3 a> O O C) a, a) C) a> O I, - 5 iz Er E c._ c `u = C Q V .2 c .o o v O �; o `� c ' c C) = c - c 7'0 _ c " ° U ° L 'W W t) vL. n mU -) ZCvcr0 �" � 0 Ca 5 � E Y V E ea • � o -L, v rN 6) Q n ` u 44^ � L L C Z s r C c cc u U e ° % O w• c = f v 0 u oz y , R i o d t v .. E ` V + C L � C C o 4 = G., 'c p A., O y. W e C 4 c u 3 t 4." - , p Q C v, V C C c E c y V c R U = N E s 0: E ÷.- e -62.5 • LL L •O 'O i a O 0 '� V = 0 .., = :, L y E V e F V C to . C •V 'A ,4' CO v CA 0 Q., •r=, i .4' 0 w 'O O S •L VI ,-H c r, , Q c L O O CQ 'C 'fl O � O O O ,= V, ,-S• _ .0 cw c -n.-d 1 O . 7 L = L 6) .r L L {. 0 L L '-' Y Q O 0. 4 ^7 p C o. � > r� aca3 et cG � ama, �nm0., 0: = zZ � = E=0E.w = = e - c c .•r N M '' If) 'C P 00 CT •- ' x_2 �I NM.V t•" M N O O ir/ •-y CO N O •'1' O CC r0 O N T 0' `? t N O E� N M — N en 00 et 00 M tr) M p .-� N 00 C+ O "1' N '0 N 00 — a.' O tr, '.0 N N t^' `1' 0C tq '0 C +• 0 N tt tri t-- C- co .-+ N O n IN O ; ° N N N N N M M M � `t a -3 O O0 O 00 O ° n 00 n 00 0 �J 2 ,)r _ V M O` O O O rn M N N 0 0 c �°„ N 0' 00 in V N o O oo A -_ _O �' vi N C` 3 c EA — EA EA EA — m'fl EA *}3 EA 69 E n vi 'u Q 00 M '.O 00 0 in - M mot' N .� 5. 7 `^. O in (-- .0 t'•r M '.0 c- E- '1- Cl rn 'C G' V O M — C L.c 2• Z Z 7ei - O` �7 N V V�. vl- �n. M.. .O s a O O V 0 Cl M O so- in in O' +'^ s c o v (-(-1 -- :o — oo c rn M O EA c pp E'-'! U ` V1 '7 EA O va N N oo — c's v l V EA. EA - EA EA EA 69 - `o v; E W ;11 EA EA Y QE .� U M t- et 1 M O WI tri t"- It 00 1!1' .7 a ' g--' CO 'w La4 vt M tri tri N M N M 00 M i 9 .- :i L 0 ►-t y ''t t'.. 00 I!t ' ''-G O ire O AG 00 - C. CL C a 00 C� 1 tri \0. U; sD M tr; 1� g5 C'? „IL Its ..a L "+e 'C` '.0 O - O .t N O' WI 40 N 7's W.. o C �. C/ t'�? try ... 1 LO - c.o.:, in '0 M t`- t/? s' Q Cl. M ,.r N — El) 00 '. ro- = g E•. U 04 (- EA EA EA EA EA EA EA x A f, E Z a0 ._ Z cat - W G' O O O' O O 're O C- O O o " Y ZL `4" EA 000 MAY O Cy9 M 69 00 EA• Ei9 t y x V 00 Cl h. 00 `� - 1.2 $ �+ ..d E.9 EA to EA > "CI C o c'5 u N a > Z C c C c ^ C c " C c- �+ O �„ 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C = r•' Z U 17 aT. 's 's ai u .— U. V U V U o_ 8- -a R E~ Q O �- C• 4:. y y0.. ^ O ,0.. t- " 0 .T.. C r` 04 'o Z E O Z I. .t.0-t-," ."'U ^ 7 .0 y n 7 .� y . v 7 � = J ?' r C N 7 C 7, C N C C •7, C 7, C C :+ o � a J y :U aJ CJ aJ J a! L 2 2 ca "4 0 6 C O O O G O O ^v .. CUu. CC_) vCU G v L.iCL MvcC.0 v 8 a I - F_ . .., E'.* g Q 'G .-i. u ^:J' I '0 :d C E on s CO N 0 o 0 tet E'4 G t.. is C '-- = C aJ L) 5 0 v_ .0 3 v A �^., w W ea c t) a,c 0 i o C U 01 C o c y s s ^ 0 0 0 c O y O •- o -. 0 y ct 0 01 O ..1 O g^ c c S x a i- •-.I UUL✓ u CF- -, Uce zU v v) UtrJ U ";2. _.': U r,>. r. ti2 0 ; O O . (jy •..., .. y c v O Ca. CC C 6! N rr k E aJ L J V E _ r— O V L � .L E ..= v ` _ v - cc O 4 U Y, ,., C Cv4 L - C 3 l '�7. 6a 40 t' V: y ,^ O J 6Vi 0 CG .., O z :+ CC c t' E O .. F., U C *a. . - 5 u . :I" •i a c 5 R ar y 5 c .y -.3 E O S O C4 O "- y, .O ".a ot w L ei, t to . tr . , H 32 cr. ox•L L r V i w L .4 64 03 ,C 6J .17. C. GLO i •L . O 2 O'y G u C t a 0 0 R y y o a 0 L O 0 O -- is 0 > 0 0 0 4, Z 0 0 .0 L G4 L 0 0 0 8 L C t- 0 0 0 R ^ 0 O O V w p c- .aZ Ug 7 G. � z za.. 0,.. d � Uz o: zt'..VJz :Ag E p2E U _ /� V a G G O`L p C O .-- N M •1' Vi '0 t� 00 O, O ,., e, ,c:, i3 ..r .r .r ... .. .* .r — ..r N 1 I 7 N. ", 00 M . 0. 0 en — 0, ■O N I 00 iti C It^ 00 III O O .O .O O 00 .D Off• O N en co N -•'• •••■ It, ON !t E M V1 eel, N .o I r N Co,O O' N 144441 —o U CO C C 1.., Ir 114 !t N ( ) ,O d v ; to Ir I/1 It, Vi ' N N N N 00 7 12 r o .0 o` o In c c c c o O K N rr v1 O N O O C O O O 0 2 �0 — .0 O C C •I' O O � N R Y CE ∎n N N C O C I N C .O (- 00 E cv M Cr` n 00 In In N C M v74 C E• O '.0 .0 M (-• N N ti0 — 00 v- ._ u. 4 O• 69 OC .6 (P1 O — r- = % o ER 69 — — (ft — vi :r,', v ER ER 159 E/3 EA E g f t A t 4 2'1• s N. 7 M 00 C .0 C f�1 O N o E•" M M 00 .0 M C 0. O O O Z — N O N M I!) C N O .0. 00 O; $ ,9_ `c_ Z �, 4 N N Ni to C C o0 N .0 s c. 0 el N v 00 OC N OC C T7 M — s ^ A � a If, •k-)- 00 t7 M — r- 00 00 f^� S. C u, E." M.; ER ER 69 EH EH EA — c 0 s E C.;+ E.. EA `■ 'c = 8t,! ^ C L 0 O, C Iti ('� [-- O et O CC QC M s .O O t- M M O O C N - . M — C M [`• IC, I(: O +r t'- .-. c. •; - L1 a Cdr 4.0 00 .r. N O V0 N 00 C 't M Iti 7,c` C^ .� OC C' M — `7 00 ON M 00 a�1 E-I C� OC Z co) (0) En E(A EA EA X m v E 4,1 Z u C c a LL C O 'T O O C O O O O O O " o > a •. 0 = N 69 ER d EA EA 164 C OO 69 2 7 s a a Q o v ou v x ° fr., EA ,n - L 6. c E. v ., E 0 69 I 69 49 0 _a o0 W Le A c c c c =X r CZ rd co O 0 U O 0 0 0 O T O '5 C...7 ..t C.) U U U V U U V �,e . . ` c . ^' v s. Q • E"i eE Z O = s• C z-, o. O Z E V L .y v .:41.OU y A i .Ul - ..0 c J le C R 0C O 0 ,a = U C t) C o. W bD 7 0 O O a) O O U (5 •5 = a g e0 . V V V V GaV GUaV a v- o V c.D C Q -' E = ti., :0 c0 .L .0 ,- 2 o.G .7 0 0 E o, .c .. L, U v Q, 0 U u _ _ a� y ' s_ Q� Jr :4 a' •v O 0 O p O _O E C > .e" c > c J c > v. _2'r .� (A O O C O , ��, T— O 7 ' O O r �. O O O of F •_ R( icy O O c0 � i- O � O O R �'!'o � A te" � VvV V � Ua C.) = a. UE- a. � V mL u.. V F- c. g. . co ., J _ Z c O w - v cd c CC c t•=7 E" _ w E = v Y �y � ^:X ,o E != r1 5 •v /L C ^ V S u J 7 ^ ! f1J L ; Ji V Z e+Z x = s L G •p ri y R : E O R .G .= • O '4 E - e 7. Q. L O C cg G Z O G R 2 p-0,o O 0.„ v C - m R O a. G 4'4 p 8 U p ‘ e` a+ 0 • C t O p ^ v y h , , m .O R E 0 E m E e . O J c.„, ° 7_, E € 0 5 6 'r S = eZ .0 CJ C 0 Z "0 r 4 „ A 4.+ •C = M r40 v • • '' • J . = =. i a L w L 0 ci d E E L F u 'vs i OC c C a cT C � L S L y 0 0 p O u 0 IC C el Eld i . . s ti v g 0;, mav: ZvZC. Z 6 mmmav: sv; ao. Zg o.aE 2 '' 7, .Y tovb' en .0 (r 00 0, O .• = 8 ':G N N N N N N N M M ^ I CS tn N v, Ill 1 W, tn a; •n ten R ON 'e c OC r .. CC M 14 14 tres E— CT M 'O t� IN CC N N N N N- N O N N OS, O' ";, T, '^' vi v 00 00 O0 0000 1 C+ Cr, O` ON ON W 2 I G C K; 2. � U C C OC C C C C C C 00 = 2 C C C C C - ,..0 ' C C "? g , N M oC M 'n C C C C t " �- N N as v — In en C cn tr,, s ffl 4, e E 7 •1, u ` G ^ 7/p� W N en 1 C C C C C ' 'o z y 2 Z It — (C M 00 C 1 C v 1 C C C• C cc r O Z t 0u _ 0 C C n °� rn r N 5. y F � ` � 4 9 2 � be r o c J E� s• C, a a r C C C C C .,c GC C W Ti" ' N 00 G, v1 tr 0 N c C C C C I Y9 C v O .a+ cn 00 r� 4 r•a O O V9 7 `o ▪ a r N C C N N to in N r.v = ..— «. ^ ?- E•' Co 0t '.1.. .4 f.9 N 4, 4, 6N9 T ro c Z C E.., 5R b9 ' cff O c s = H st •• Q w = 7e 00 00 C .�' 01,L c �. . CC4 O L Lrc 4 G O F. N co d E c c . a Z , O C L7 p c ; C c � - _ � ` u.1 Z C u tO — C Q � OL Ow CL A N f TA y ^ y 0 x E c • C ..I 0 0 0 y a e. • a) i-.1 c U C.J �.c. u C.) :L i. i U. 2 . V c L .O y Q Ec.G . O a a t c . A aN F c C a c > C v o > co v . Nt Y s+ (4 H O c) ctf • O -- c.j ''' Tt O p Ti p •7 t.,, . Y. r, Ce x � V 0 310 2 v J > �Lts� c v yU .5 L) :7,— f c2 C.) -8--:.7, m 1 O 1 c es S- . n V I C a tes C . ; V n C i .. aow0- c Id O c c '`<a E 1a .� _ u ° ... > C D y E c o E. .F,„ d i r. p a C J - :c E c L i , - . •7.,-$ a = a M a 6 p: •!' . S . FL; -' r & '4.0 L CC Z O c0 > a a '' .yr C Z C 0 s -4 77 C 0. a C CJ E C C O W v c w G Z E ° a s C, O .. e o E e . • .° u E o f o 61 2 '4 %w o a a .= 4. 4 i = ° U 'O a T a 4 irol w C ° � 4 '� O ca L a 2 C r , O■ ,0 o y y, O v c v z' CE y O O p 0.0 c t•v C. CC r^^j. Z f CC W Z V Z ✓7 CC > CG E f E - a.'4-2 2 c N M U N 00 O' O VS M M M M M M M M "f - M^^,t CAC February 23,2015 IX-2 Old Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15-Year Permit Application Status OBJECTIVE: Provide information pertaining to the 15-year permit application for renourishment of the Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples Beaches. CONSIDERATIONS: Review and discuss the status of the 15-year permit application for renourishment of Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples beaches. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Joint Coastal Permit(JCP): A permit application has been submitted and the 30-day review period from submittal is coming to an end. FDEP will issue a Request for Additional Information (RAI) on Thursday, February 13, 2015. County staff expects minor comments from FDEP based on preliminary discussions. United State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE): A pre-application meeting was held approximately 30 days ago with no significant comments. However, the USACE is required to consult with Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) on endangered species and National Marine Fisheries (NMF) on fish populations. These agencies, in the past, have required significant time to evaluate resources, habitat and community concerns. Typically time lines have been significantly exceeded. Formal consultation will be required nesting sea turtles, manatees and critical sea turtle nesting habitat. FWS will also require consultation on Piping Plover and Red Knotts. Additionally, FWS has notified staff that Panther activity on truck haul routes will require formal consultation by FWS. Extension of Existing 10-Year Permits: FDEP has extended the existing 10-year permit 2 years to January 12, 2017. Staff has applied for a 2-year extension of the existing USACE permit that will expire in November 2014. FWS is reluctant to conduct consultation on a permit extension and a new permit application concurrently. Consultation is required on the Red Knott and the Panthers. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: For information only LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and presents no legal issues at this time.—CMG RECOMMENDATION: To provide information regarding the 15-year permit application status. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department CAC February 23,2015 IX-3 Old Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2015 Beach Renourishment Plan OBJECTIVE: Collier County Beach Renourishment — November 2015 for Vanderbilt and/or Park Shore and/or Pelican Bay. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Issue a purchase order to Humiston & Moore to perform the annual monitoring of the County Beaches and Inlets by February 27, 2015. 2. Conduct survey's and analyze the results of the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay and Park Shore Beaches and complete by April 24, 2015 (8 weeks). 3. RFP and contract for selection of an engineering consultant. • RFP document to Purchasing by January 29, 2015 • Bid, select and award contract by May 1, 2015 (13 weeks) 4. Analyze survey data and recommend beach segments to be renourished and quantities May 1, 2015 to May 29, 2014 (4 weeks). 5. Milestone No. 1 — BCC approves renourishment segments and quantities on May 26, 2015 (CAC May 14th and TDC on May 25`h) 6. Develop RFP for sand purchase from upland mines, bid and award sand contract by June 26, 2015 (4 weeks). This is a supply contract FOB mine site. 7. Milestone No. 2—BCC approves sand supplier on June 23, 2015. 8. Milestone No. 3 —Regulatory Permit issued by July 1, 2015. a) New JCP FDEP and USACE permit for 15year Beach Renourishment, or, b) 2-year extension of existing USACE permit that expires in November 2015 is granted. 9. Contract award to sand supplier with manufacture of sand complete for November 1, 2015 hauling date (18 weeks). 10. Engineering, design, permitting, state NTP, plans, specifications and bid package, June 1, 2015 to August 14, 2015 (10 weeks). 11. RFP and contract for sand placement contract August 14, 2015 to October 9, 2015 (8 weeks). 12. Milestone No. 4—Award sand placement contract at BCC October 13, 2015. 13. Administrative and mobilize contractor October 14, 2015 to November 1, 2015. 14. Milestone No. 5 —Renourishment begins November 1, 2015. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: For Information only LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Provide information on beach renourishment plan. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department