Loading...
PBSD MSTBU Agenda 09/04/2013 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING & BENEFIT UNIT NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4 AT 1:00 PM AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108. AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes a. July 10 Regular Session b. June 26 Landscape &Water Management Committee c. June 11 Survey Committee 5. Administrator's report a. Status of office lease b. Monthly financial report c. *Brief discussion about the Pelican Bay Maintenance Facility d. *Beach renourishment permitting and funding e. Clam Pass Monitoring Update f. Board of County Commissioners Budget Hearing/Thursday, September 5 at 5:05 PM 6. Chairman's report a. Review of Pelican Bay Services Division ("PBSD") Municipal Service Taxing & Benefit Unit ("MSTBU") location boundaries in plain language vs. boundaries of potential oversight, if any, for Seagate and Clam Pass Park (Joe Chicurel) b. Removal of cobblestones at San Marino project update c. Announcements 7. Committee reports a. Clam Bay(Susan O'Brien) i. Funds for completing Clam Bay Management Plan b. Landscape &Water Management(Dave Trecker) i. Proposals for water quality consultant services ii. Status of pilot programs on lakes iii. Status of Copper Data and Analysis c. Survey Committee 8. Old business 9. New business a. *Pedestrian Safety at Oakmont Parkway&Woodhaven Lane (Joe Chicurel) b. *Share the road with bicycles signage (Joe Chicurel) c. Mapping Pelican Bay's water management system (Susan O'Brien) 10. Audience comments 11. Miscellaneous correspondence 12. Adjourn *asterisk indicates possible Board action item ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE,1NHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT(239)597-1749 OR VISIT PELICANBAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET. 9/03/2013 8:28:21 AM PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY,JULY 10,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Regular Session, Wednesday,July 10 at 1:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida. The following members were present: Pelican Bay Services Division Board Tom Cravens, Chairman John laizzo Dave Trecker,Vice Chairman Michael Levy Joe Chicurel Susan O'Brien Frank C. Dickson, II Scott Streckenbein absent John Domenie Hunter Hansen absent Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W.Neil Dorrill, Administrator Mary McCaughtry Operations Analyst Kyle Lukasz, Operations Manager Lisa Resnick, Recording Secretary Also Present Kevin Carter, Field Manager, Dorrill Management Group LuAnn Giovannelli, General Manager, Bay Colony Community Association Tim Hall, Principal, Turrell, Hall&Associates, Inc. Jim Hoppensteadt, President&Chief Operating Officer,Pelican Bay Foundation Kathy Worley, Co-Director Environmental Science&Biologist, Conservancy of Southwest Florida 25 in the audience REVISED (FINAL)AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of June 5 Regular Session Meeting Minutes 5. Administrator's report a. RFP process as it relates to updating the Clam Bay Management Plan b. Monthly financial report c. Office lease 05^ d. Tropical Storm Chantal Update add-on 6. Chairman's report a. Crosswalks i. * Discussion of the language and intent of the Board's approval of John Ch... . s January 2, 2013 motion to remove the cobblestones at the Pelican Bay B•a .r. ." San Marino crosswalk (Joe Chicurel) ii. * Discussion and approval to remove cobblestones and replace with pavers Pelican Bay Boulevard and Hammock Oak Drive pedestrian cro (To Cravens) iii. *Discussion & approval to remove cobblestones at all locations a __ 1=�=° Boulevard (Joe Chicurel) item withdrawn , A $r b. Announcements 7 Committee reports .' a. Clam Bay(Susan O'Brien) Clam Bay Management Plan update b. Landscape& Water Management 8620 i Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes 0' Wednesday,July 10, 2013 i. * Review and approval of revised brochure ii. * Review& approval of contract for lakes & Clam Bay sampling, analysis& reporting iii. Status of pilot programs on lakes c. Survey Committee(Dave Trecker) i. Community survey ii. Monthly PBSD piece in Pelican Bay Post 8. Old business a. Beach Renourishment(Dave Trecker) add-on 9. New business a. Raccoons (Susan O'Brien) b. Mapping Pelican Bay's water management system(Susan O'Brien) c. Bicycles on Pelican Bay Boulevard(Susan O'Brien) add-on 10. Audience comments 11. Miscellaneous correspondence 12. Adjourn ROLL CALL Eight members were present and two(Hansen, Streckenbein)were absent. AGENDA APPROVAL Vice Chairman Trecker motioned,Mr.Levy seconded to approve the agenda as amended, adding items 5d, 8a, and 9c. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. APPROVAL OF JUNE 5 BOARD REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES Mr. Domenie motioned,Mr. Levy seconded to approve the June 5 Board Regular Session meeting minutes as amended[p. 8618 replacing "Gould"with "Noble"and adding roll call vote resultsJ. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT PROCUREMENT PROCESS TO UPDATE THE CLAM BAY MANAGEMENT PLAN Mr. Dorrill reported the outcome of a meeting with Ms. O'Brien, County Purchasing staff JIM Clerk of Courts to discuss proposals,work orders and anticipated work product pertaining to the J. o Bay management plan. The original scope of work was to"update"the existing management $ however,the existing plan was solely for mangrove restoration. The intentions are to deve ..as ,, comprehensive management plan that includes separate scientific and biological task: •r wildli �vys and to move forward as quickly and as thoroughly as possible. There are sufficie ° . '4 xp '�s currently under County contract to provide these services. The Board would have t• °. . • o move forward knowing that an RFP process is not necessary and would take .. :iial 4 j nths. a 8621 r nt Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes Wednesday,July 10,2013 Mr. Dorrill understood the purpose of the management plan is for community stewardship and added the plan should address the ideal or preferred permanent maintenance dredging measurements for length, width, and depth supported by meaningful data and science. Ms. O'Brien explained that the Army Corps of Engineers opined that a management plan was not necessary in order to apply for a dredging permit. The plan was for the community's guidance and benefit. Ms. O'Brien directed staff to schedule a Clam Bay Committee meeting as soon as possible to work on updating the existing management plan. Mr. Hall agreed the plan is for the community's benefit. For the regulatory agencies, the plan serves the purpose of outlining dredging goals and objectives, and expected results. Engineering data and measurements would provide scientific support for the permit application. The Clam Bay Stakeholders responses illustrate what Stakeholders consider important. The draft plan does not need to include optional wildlife surveys or seagrass studies. Ms. Kathy Worley opined that dredging is a tool to manage a system and should not drive the management plan. The goals and objectives of the management plan need to be defined clearly. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT Ms. O'Brien motioned,Mr. Levy seconded to accept the monthly financial report. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. OFFICE SPACE UPDATE Mr. Dickson motioned,Mr. Domenie seconded to direct the administrator to move forward with negotiation of the office lease as outlined. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. TROPICAL STORM CHARLENE UPDATE (ADD-ON) u= Mr. Dorrill explained that if preparation for the storm or debris cleanup were necessary field st. would be on call and any hours worked paid at the overtime rate. r CHAIRMAN'S REPORT CROSSWALKS "' DISCUSSION OF INTENT OF MOTION APPROVED JANUARY 2013 TO ' , COBBLESTONES AT PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD AND SAN MARINO ' :: WA Dr. Chicurel motioned,Vice Chairman Trecker seconded that when the cob O - •1 " , moved 1a at the San Marino crosswalk that they are replaced with the same street ii4 .nd Ilii.g that have been used at other Pelican Bay paver crosswalks that do not have co� ` • Mr. Dorrill recommended removing the existing concrete hea :i e -.der installed. Mr. Lukasz estimated the header work would add $ 1,11 f • 11- c® •�:a total of$18,000. T n 8622 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes y Wednesday,July 10,2013 Dr. Chicurel withdrew the motion. DISCUSSION& APPROVAL TO REMOVE COBBLESTONES & REPLACE WITH PAVERS AT PELICAN BAY BLVD AT HAMMOCK OAK PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK The Board discussed the intended purpose of the cobblestones and responsibility for removal. Those in favor of removing cobblestones argued the cobblestones caused noise pollution,annoyed residents, and did not serve the intended purpose to calm traffic or provide increased safety for pedestrians. Arguments against removal included insignificant decibel readings, cost of removal, and the need for additional community input before making a decision. Mr. Gerald Moffatt explained the Foundation paid to put the cobblestones in; however,the Services Division is responsible for maintenance. -11 RII I/\/III I/ Chairman Cravens motioned,Dr. Chicurel seconded that the cobblestones be removed and replaced with pavers at Pelican Bay Boulevard and Hammock Oak Drive pedestrian crosswalk. The Board voted three(3) in favor(Cravens, Trecker, Chicurel)to five(5) opposed(Dickson,Domenie,laizzo,Levy, O'Brien) and the motion failed. DISCUSSION& APPROVAL TO REMOVE COBBLESTONES AT ALL LOCATIONS ON PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD Dr. Chicurel withdrew the item. ANNOUNCEMENTS The Board's next meeting is September 4. Due to lack of quorum,there is no meeting in August. Chairman Cravens directed the Administrator to contact Mr. Hansen to delegate a proxy to participate and pursue one additional commercial member to replace the vacant position. LANDSCAPE &WATER MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF REVISED BROCHURE Vice Chairman Trecker motioned,Dr. Chicurel seconded to accept the revised brochure as amended[1)p. 2 insert "in the waters of Clam Bay."to read"...3.7 ir micrograms per liter in the waters of Clam Bay."and 2) insert `...to develop a plan" to read"...to develop a plan to fix the problem."The Board voted unanimously i favor and the motion passed The brochure would be included in the annual assessment notice. � . 4y iJ a1_ 8623 . w Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes Wednesday,July 10,2013 REVIEW &APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR LAKES AND CLAM BAY SAMPLING, ANALYSIS,AND REPORTING Vice Chairman Trecker reported contacting Conservancy experts for recommendations on water quality measurement criteria in the lakes and in Clam Bay. Vice Chairman Trecker motioned, Chairman Cravens seconded to instruct staff to approach consultants on the County-approved list to include Turrell,Hall, &Associates, Cardno/ENTRIX and at least several others for interest and cost estimates for water quality sampling, data analysis, and reporting on a quarterly basis in the upland lakes. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. Mr. Dorrill informed the Board that although Cardno/ENTRIX was a County approved vendor, the firm was not eligible to perform the scope of work stated in the motion. STATUS OF PILOT PROGRAM IN LAKES Mr. Lukasz reported that aquatic plantings and aeration installation is complete,bacteria treatment is ongoing in the identified lakes, and ceased the use of copper sulfate in Basins 3, 5,and 6. Yesterday, floating islands were installed in the Avalon Lake. MISCELLANEOUS After staff has obtained the information,the Committee would schedule a meeting to evaluate the identified consultants, services, and cost estimates. Vice Chairman Trecker suggested inviting lake and estuary water management experts to consider hiring as consultants starting in the fall. Vice Chairman Trecker appointed Dr. Chicurel as Acting Chairman of the Committee until September. SURVEY COMMITTEE REPORT COMMUNITY SURVEY The Board discussed survey topics,timing, and vendors. The Board agreed that the purpose o Atic survey was to obtain community sentiment on bicycle lanes before Pelican Bay Boulevard is paved qifo' other topics mentioned. Chairman Cravens directed members to send comments to Ms. Resni eTthe Committee to discuss at a future Committee meeting. MONTHLY PBSD PIECE IN PELICAN BAY POST The Board directed staff to proceed with reporting to the community on a b � y of the Pelican Bay Post a brief summary of Board action taken. ` t 8624 077,- s Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes i Wednesday,July 10,2013 OLD BUSINESS BEACH RENOURISHMENT(ADD-ON) Vice Chairman Trecker reported that the Board of County Commissioners' decided to include Pelican Bay beaches in the County's beach renourishment project; however,the Services Division, lacking authority and budget, would not be responsible for funding the project. NEW BUSINESS RACCOONS Ms. O'Brien motioned, Chairman Cravens seconded to stop trapping raccoons in the Pelican Bay Community. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. MAPPING PELICAN BAY'S WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Ms. O'Brien explained that mapping Pelican Bay's water management system would assist with gaining an understanding of the source of the copper problem. Staff would compile existing information to determine what additional information is necessary. BICYCLES ON PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD (ADD-ON) Ms. O'Brien observed the Sheriff has been ticketing bicyclists for moving violations because State law requires bicyclists to operate as vehicles and obey the same traffic laws. Dr. Chicurel planned to introduce bicycle safety or"sharrow" signage at the next meeting. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None ADJOURN Vice Chairman Trecker motioned,Mr. Iaizzo seconded to adjourn. The Board voted unanimously in favor, the motion passed, and meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m. Tom Cravens, Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 7/18/2013 i PrylEt. leaktir a.. - �� 8625 . o A LANDSCAPE & WATER MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES ■ WEDNESDAY,JUNE 26,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Landscape & Water Management Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 1:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples, Florida 34108. The following members were present: Landscape Water Management Committee Dave Trecker, Chairman Tom Cravens Joe Chicurel Scott Streckenbein absent Pelican Bay Services Division Board Members Also Present John Domenie appointed to Landscape& Water Management Committee at today's meeting Susan O'Brien Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W. Neil Dorrill,Administrator Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst Kyle Lukasz, Operations Manager Lisa Resnick, Recording Secretary Three in the audience AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of May 21 Landscape& Water Management Committee meeting minutes 3. Water-quality brochure changes 4. Status of lakes pilot program (Lukasz) 5. Status of Endothol testing in Basins 5 and 6 (Lukasz) 6. Status of sediment sampling (Lukasz) 7. Water quality data analysis and reporting—Cardno/ENTRIX option (Dorrill) 8. Audience Comments 9. Adjourn ROLL CALL Three members were present and one was absent(Streckenbein). At the request of Chairman Trecker, Ms. Susan O'Brien participated. ° APPROVAL OF MAY 21 LANDSCAPE & WATER MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MINUT. a Mr. Cravens motioned,Dr. Chicurel seconded to approve the May 21 Landscape& ° >. r Management Committee meeting minutes as presented. The Committee voted u ._ f'ou t in favor and the motion passed. WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING Chairman Trecker explained that Pelican Bay Services Division field staff +1 oc : ality samples in lakes and in Clam Bay then sent to the County's laboratory fob =,qual- ng. The water quality data is sent to Turrell, Hall &Associates for analysis. The firm y Af.,es s 1 , On a monthly basis, analyzes Clam Bay data on a quarterly basis, and produces a re s 001 . . basis. r 26 Landscape&Water Management Committee Meeting Minutes June 26,2013 Ms. O'Brien was concerned about compiling water quality data from other sources for analysis of the"complete picture". The Committee directed staff to obtain a cost estimate form Cardno/ENTRIX, a County contracted vendor to analyze water quality data on a quarterly basis of 42 lakes and provide a list of alternative County-eligible contractors. Chairman Trecker would contact Jennifer Hecker, Conservancy of Southwest Florida to obtain a recommendation on the criteria to test water quality. By September,the Committee should be in the position to make a recommendation to the board for sampling analysis and reporting. STATUS OF LAKES PILOT PROGRAM Mr. Lukasz reported that littoral plantings and aeration installation is complete. The identified lakes are undergoing bacteria treatment. The floating islands installation should be complete by mid-July. WATER QUALITY BROCHURE CHANGES Chairman Trecker and Dr. Chicurel reviewed their water quality brochure revisions intended to be"less offensive without losing impact". The Committee agreed to present the brochure to the full Board on July 10 for approval for preparation to distribute with the August assessment notice. STATUS OF ENDOTHOL TESTING IN BASINS 5 AND 6 Mr. Lukasz reported Endothol has replaced copper sulfate to treat algae in Basins 3, 5, and 6. The Committee directed staff to acquire a sonic device to test efficacy for treating algae in the Glenview Lake. STATUS OF SEDIMENT SAMPLING Mr. Lukasz reported that sediment sampling in two lakes in each basin should be complete by the end of the week. COPPER IN LAKES The Committee discussed copper sources, solubility, and sediment measurements reported + other nearby communities. COMMITTEE ADMINISTRATION Mr. Cravens appointed Mr.John Domenie to the Landscape& Water Management t Chairman Trecker appointed Dr. Chicurel as Interim Chairman of the Lan+ " `~ ater Management Committee until September 1. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. John Domenie commented on littoral plantings, floating i .1 +s,140 meas water quality. Mr.Jack Thompson was concerned about nutrient levels in r 27 Landscape&Water Management Committee Meeting Minutes June 26,2013 1 Ms. Mollie Moffatt was concerned about reclaimed water being dangerous to animals and assured 1 it was not. ADJOURN Mr. Cravens motioned,Dr. Chicurel seconded to adjourn. The Committee voted I unanimously in favor,the motion passed, and meeting adjourned at 2:37 p.m. Dave Trecker, Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 7/17/2013 11:10:09 AM ASE g 7�1 u 28k 4 tea ` SURVEY COMMITTEE OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION TUESDAY,JUNE 11,2013 AT 1:00 PM LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Survey Committee of the Pelican Bay Services Division met Tuesday, June 11 at 1:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida. The following members were present: Survey Committee Tom Cravens, Chairman Dave Trecker Susan O'Brien Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator Kyle Lukasz, Operations Manager Mary McCaughtry Operations Analyst Lisa Resnick, Recording Secretary Also Present John Domenie, Pelican Bay Services Division Board 4 in the audience AGENDA 1. Roll call 2. Agenda approval 3. Communications 4. Compiling water quality data discussion 5. Committee structure 6. Developing a community survey to include bicycle lanes 7. Adjourn ROLL CALL All committee members were present. COMMUNICATIONS The Committee discussed whether to publish a monthly summary of Board actions take ,.e iew ongoing projects,and Clam Bay updates in the Pelican Bay Post or using another medium . a+ . •u ® � make a recommendation to the full Board. COMPILING WATER QUALITY DATA DISCUSSION Ms. O'Brien explained there is Pelican Bay and Clam Bay water quality d: o-o ources to compile and analyze. Chairman Cravens said the Landscape and Water Manageme a ~e is t =opropriate forum for a discussion about water quality data �seV 1 Survey Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday,June 11, 2013 Dr. Trecker mentioned that he would revise the water quality brochure and discuss at the June 26 Landscape and Water Management Committee meeting. COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ms. Mollie Moffatt did not support the motion. Mr.Merlin Lickhalter suggested establishing a safety committee. Dr. Trecker motioned,Ms. O'Brien seconded,that the Committee make a recommendation to the full Board that a standing committee to deal with streets,crosswalks,and pathways be established. The Committee voted one(1)in favor(Trecker)to two(2)opposed(Cravens, O'Brien)and the motion failed. COMMUNITY SURVEY TO INCLUDE BICYCLE LANES The Committee discussed developing a community survey to find out whether to install bicycle lanes in the roadway,widening the pathways, installing pavers at the three community entrances, landscaping changes, and identifying areas that do not have adequate streetlights. The Committee agreed to discuss survey topics with the full Board; however,there was concern over the timeline and sense of urgency to complete a survey prior to the County repaves Pelican Bay Boulevard. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. Thomas Brown did not support bicycle lanes in the roadway. Mr. John Domenie supported vehicles sharing the road with bicycles or"sharrow"signage. Mr. Merlin Lickhalter suggested the Committee determine the accurate regulatory agencies requirements for marking bicycle lanes in the roadway and informed that the Foundation's Strategic Planning Committee(SPC)was also preparing a community survey and suggested the Committee work with the SPC to prevent duplication. OFFICE SPACE UPDATE 3 Mr. Dorrill reported that the office is moving temporarily to the Fourth Floor and exploring renewing the current lease and looking at adjacent locations. The current lease expires in Decem$x, .'nd staff would execute a new lease before the end of summer. The Foundation is looking into a .ger , shared space arrangement with the County on the 12-acre utility site ADJOURN I � rc; _�^ a Dr. Trecker motioned,Ms.O'Brien seconded to adjourn. The Committee v. u n7 ly in favor,the motion passed,and the meeting adjourned at 2:28 PM. m E r Tom Cravens, Chairman ! . a 46.141*-- 7/15/2013 3:59:54 PM 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 1 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-August 31,2013 Operating Fund 109-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 1,073,753.00 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 1,038,524.26 Due from Property Appraiser - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 2,112,277.26 Total Assets $ 2,112,277.26 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 4,45636 Accrued Wages Payable - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 3,167.89 Total Liabilities $ 7,624.45 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 1,068,208.22 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 1,036,444.59 Total Fund Balance $ 2,104,652.81 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 2,112,277.26 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 2 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-August 31,2013 Operating Fund 109-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 951,600.00 $ 951,600.00 $ 951,600.00 $ - Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 695,000.00 667,200.00 669,852.89 2,652.89 Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 1,878,800.00 1,803,648.00 1,810,531.67 6,883.67 Charges for Services 1,500.00 - - - Insurance Company Refunds - - 1,684.80 1,684.80 Surplus Property Sales - - 5,561.00 5,561.00 Revenue Reserve (128,700.00) - Interest 15,800.00 11,850.00 6,423.50 (5,426.50) Total Operating Revenues $ 3,414,000.00 $ 3,434,298.00 $ 3,445,653.86 $ 11,355.86 Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense $ 43,300.00 5 38,300.00 $ 38,117.13 $ 182.87 Emergency Maintenace and Repairs 8,000.00 - - IT Direct Capital 200.00 200.00 200.00 - IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 4,600.00 4,600.00 4,600.00 - Indirect Cost Reimbursement 85,100.00 85,100.00 85,100.00 - Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 13,400.00 13,400.00 13,400.00 - Other Contractural Services 29,700.00 29,700.00 29,060.00 640.00 Telephone 3,900.00 3,600.00 2,962.90 637.10 Postage and Freight 2,200.00 2,000.00 824.97 1,175.03 Rent Buildings and Equipment 11,000.00 10,500.00 10,877.33 (377.33) Insurance-General 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 - Printing,Binding and Copying 1,800.00 1,800.00 1,160.47 639.53 Clerk's Recording Fees 1,000.00 - - - Advertising 1,500.00 1,300.00 30.00 1,270.00 Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,000.00 900.00 410.50 489.50 Training and Education 1,100.00 1,000.00 405.90 594.10 Total Water Management Admin Operating $ 208,800.00 $ 193,400.00 $ 188,149.20 $ 5,250.80 Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 134,600,00 $ 119,100.00 5 118,865.14 $ 234.86 Engineering Fees 10,000.00 10,000.00 13,742.40 (3,742.40) Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 18,000.00 18,000.00 22,548.31 (4,548.31) Landscape Materials/Replanting Program 8,500.00 7,800.00 2,731.22 5,068.78 Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 30,100.00 25,100.00 16,347.00 8,753.00 Plan Review Fees 1,500.00 - Other Contractural Services 1,000.00 900.00 - 900.00 Temporary Labor 44,900.00 40,200.00 39,836.76 363.24 Telephone 500.00 500.00 436.43 63.57 Trash and Garbage 5,700.00 5,300.00 5,384.00 (84.00) Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 100.00 122.50 (22.50) Insurance-General 2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 - Insurance-Auto 900.00 900.00 900.00 _ Building Repairs&Mntc. 1,700.00 1,700.00 4,253.16 (2,553.16) Fleet Maintenance and Parts 2,400.00 2,400.00 5,862.00 (3,462.00) Fuel and Lubricants 3,300.00 3,000.00 2,326.07 673.93 Tree Triming 36,000.00 33,000.00 31,056.00 1,944.00 Clothing and Uniforms 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,326.00 (226.00) Page 1 of 3 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 3 of 13 Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 2,231.34 (1,731.34) Fertilizer and Herbicides 98,400.00 84,000.00 66,130.77 17,869.23 Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 1,400.00 3,870.92 (2,470.92) Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 2,500.00 4,612.49 (2,112.49) Total Water Management Field Operating $ 405,600.00 $ 359,900.00 $ 344,982.51 $ 14,917.49 Right of Way Beautification-Operating Payroll Expense $ 44,600.00 $ 39,500.00 $ 39,372.44 $ 127.56 Emergency Repairs and Maintenance 7,400.00 - - - IT Direct Capital 200.00 200.00 200.00 - Office Automation 9,500.00 9,500.00 9,500.00 Other Contractural Services 37,100.00 34,000.00 33,785.00 215.00 Telephone 3,900.00 3,600.00 2,962.90 637.10 Postage 2,200.00 1,800.00 799.30 1,000.70 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 12,200.00 11,700.00 11,786.43 (86.43) Insurance-General 500.00 500.00 500.00 - Printing,Binding and Copying 2,600.00 2,200.00 660.00 1,540.00 Clerk's Recording 2,000.00 1,700.00 - 1,700.00 Legal Advertising 2,000.00 1,700.00 122.40 1,577.60 Office Supplies General 1,000.00 900.00 410.48 489.52 Training and Education 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.62 (0.62) Total Right of Way Beautification Operating $ 126,700.00 $ 108,800.00 $ 101,599.57 $ 7,200.43 Right of Way Beautification-Field Payroll Expense $ 802,100.00 $ 715,100.00 $ 714,699.20 $ 400.80 Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 1,100.00 809.68 290.32 Flood Control(Water Use&Swale/Berm Mntc.) 89,900.00 80,200.00 75,661.03 4,538.97 Pest Control 6,000.00 6,000.00 8,975.00 (2,975.00) Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 2,300.00 781.30 1,518.70 Other Contractural Services 29,500.00 27,700.00 25,464.95 2,235.05 Temporary Labor 201,400.00 198,000.00 197,951.08 48.92 Telephone 3,200.00 2,900.00 2,389.68 510.32 Electricity 3,400.00 3,100.00 1,591.22 1,508.78 Trash and Garbage 17,000.00 10,700.00 10,205.96 494.04 Rent Equipment 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,582.12 (82.12) Motor Pool Rental Charge 500.00 500.00 481.79 18.21 Insurance-General 9,300.00 9,300.00 9,300.00 - Insurance-Auto 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 - Building Repairs and Maintenance 1,700.00 700.00 700.00 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 17,600.00 17,100.00 21,750.44 (4,650.44) Fuel and Lubricants 64,600.00 57,700.00 48,507.22 9,192.78 Licenses,Permits,Training 800.00 700.00 306.00 394.00 Tree Triming 64,500.00 64,500.00 63,753.00 747.00 Clothing and Uniforms 9,400.00 7,400.00 4,880.41 2,519.59 Personal Safety Equipment 3,000.00 2,800.00 3,865.90 (1,065.90) Fertilizer and Herbicides 62,000.00 60,200.00 60,307.36 (107.36) Landscape Maintenance 46,000.00 46,000.00 47,569.90 (1,569.90) Mulch/Landscape Materials 52,000.00 50,300.00 50,166.03 133.97 Pathway Repairs 6,000.00 5,500.00 - 5,500.00 Sprinkler Maintenance 30,000.00 26,200.00 23,670.89 2,529.11 Painting Supplies 800.00 700.00 420.05 279.95 Traffic Signs 3,000.00 2,800.00 - 2,800.00 Minor Operating Equipment 3,700.00 3,400.00 2,946.47 453.53 Other Operating Supplies 9,000.00 8,300.00 5,523.83 2,776.17 Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 1,554,700.00 $ 1,423,700.00 $ 1,394,560.51 $ 29,139.49 Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,295,800.00 $ 2,085,800.00 $ 2,029,291.79 $ 56,508.21 Page 2 of 3 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 4 of 13 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations Other Machinery and Equipment $ - $ - $ - $ - General improvements - - - - Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - Right of Way Beautification-Field Autos and Trucks $ 34,300.00 $ 34,300.00 $ 31,907.38 $ 2,392.62 Other Machinery and Equipmeny - - - - Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 34,300.00 $ 34,300.00 $ 31,907.38 $ 2,392.62 Total Capital Expenditures $ 34,300.00 $ 34,300.00 $ 31,907.38 $ 2,392.62 Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,330,100.00 $ 2,120,100.00 $ 2,061,199.17 $ 58,900.83 Non-Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 $ 241,700.00 $ 241,700.00 $ 241,700.00 $ - Transfer to Fund 320 $ - $ - $ 100,000.00 $ (100,000.00) Tax Collector Fees 79,300.00 51,545.00 49,647.70 1,897.30 Property Appraiser Fees 72,900.00 43,740.00 42,609.10 1,130.90 Reserves(2 1/2 months for Operations) 533,400.00 533,400.00 533,400.00 - Reserve for Operating Fund Capital Improvement 65,000.00 - - - Reserves for Equipment 107,800.00 107,800.00 107,800.00 - Reserved for Attrition (16,200.00) (16,200.00) (16,200.00) - Revenue Reserve - - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 1,083,900.00 $ 961,985.00 $ 1,058,956.80 $ (96,971.80) Total Expenditures $ 3,414,000.00 $ 3,082,085.00 $ 3,120,155.97 $ (38,070.97) Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 352,213.00 $ 325,497.89 $ (26,715.11) Page 3 of 3 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 5 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-August 31,2013 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 648,933.00 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 49,802.23 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 698,735.23 Total Assets $ 698,735.23 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 1,581.16 Accrued Wages Payable Total Liabilities $ 1,581.16 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 416,959.28 Excess Revenue(Expenditures) 280,194.79 Total Fund Balance 697,154.07 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 698,735.23 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 6 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-August 31,2013 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 376,200.00 $ 376,200.00 $ 376,200.00 $ - Curent Ad Valorem Tax 440,700.00 423,072.00 423,645.19 573.19 Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax - - - - Insurance Claim - - 1,286.80 1,286.80 Revenue Reserve (22,300.00) - - - Interest 6,700.00 5,025.00 2,142.31 (2,882.69) Total Operating Revenues $ 801,300.00 $ 804,297.00 $ 803,274.30 $ (1,022.70) Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense $ 43,400.00 $ 38,400.00 $ 38,217.23 $ 182.77 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 8,700.00 8,700.00 8,700,00 - Other Contractural Services 26,900.00 24,658.33 23,775.00 883.33 Telephone 3,600.00 3,300.00 2,285.69 1,014.31 Postage and Freight 2,000.00 1,800.00 1,085.97 714.03 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 11,800.00 11,300.00 11,440.66 (140.66) Insurance-General 300.00 300.00 300.00 - Office Supplies General 800.00 700.00 325.70 374.30 Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,000.00 800.00 - 800.00 Total Street Lighting Admin Operating $ 98,500.00 $ 89,958.33 $ 86,130.25 $ 3,828.08 Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 64,200.00 $ 56,800.00 $ 56,836.98 $ (36.98) Erhergency Maintenance&Repairs 9,600.00 - - - Other Contractual Services 800.00 700.00 - 700,00 Telephone 500.00 500.00 439.05 60.95 Electricity 42,700.00 39,100.00 27,278.54 11,821.46 Insurance-General 900.00 900.00 900.00 - Insurance-Auto 900.00 900.00 900.00 - Building Maintenace&Repairs 1,700.00 - - Fleet Maintenance and Parts 1,500.00 1,400.00 509.70 890.30 Fuel and Lubricants 900.00 800.00 751.75 48.25 Other Equipment Repairs/Supplies 200.00 200.00 200.00 - Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 500.00 - Electrical Contractors 7,300.00 6,700.00 3,440.70 3,259.30 Page 1 of 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 7 of 13 Light Bulb Ballast 13,100,00 11,800.00 8,613.43 3,186.57 Total Street Lighting Field Operating $ 144,800.00 $ 120,300.00 $ 100,370.15 $ 19,929.85 Total Field Expenditures $ 243,300.00 $ 210,258.33 $ 186,500.40 $ 23,757.93 Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery/Equipment $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ General Improvements - - - Total Capital Expenditures $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Operating Expenditures $ 244,300.00 $ 210,258.33 $ 186,500.40 $ 23,757.93 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 13,700.00 $ 8,905.00 $ 8,515.51 $ 389.49 Property Appraiser Fees 9,000.00 5,850.00 - 5,850.00 Reserve for Future Construction 444,200.00 444,200.00 444,200.00 - Reserves(2 1/2 mos.for Operations) 57,600.00 57,600.00 57,600.00 - Reserves for Equipment 32,500.00 32,500.00 32,500.00 - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 557,000.00 $ 549,055.00 $ 542,815.51 $ 6,239.49 Total Expenditures $ 801,300.00 $ 759,313.33 $ 729,315.91 $ 29,997.42 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 44,983.67 $ 73,958.39 $ 28,974.72 Page 2 of 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 8 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-August 31,2013 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and investments $ 203,798.82 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 280,681.78 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 484,480.60 Total Assets $ 484,480.60 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd - Accrued Wages Payable - Total liabilities $ - Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 213,429.30 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 271,051.30 Total Fund Balance 484,480.60 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 484,480.60 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 9 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement wj Budget-August 31,2013 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 354,768.43 $ 354,768.43 $ 354,768.43 $ - Special Assessment 134,400.00 129,024.00 129,469.81 445.81 Transfer from Fund 109 - - 100,000.00 100,000.00 Transfer from Fund 111 32,300.00 32,300.00 32,300.00 - Revenue Reserve (6,800.00) - - - Interest 800.00 700.00 822.36 122.36 Total Operating Revenues $ 515,468.43 $ 516,792.43 $ 617,360.60 $ 100,568.17 Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees $ 164,478.75 $ 35,100.00 $ 35,040.00 $ 60.00 Other Contractural Services 10,464.65 10,464.65 41,706.58 (31,241.93) Tree Trimming 67,000.00 55,800.00 29,952.00 25,848.00 Other Equipment Repairs 577.77 - - - Aerial Photography 15,000.00 10,464.65 5,449.80 5,014.85 Minor Operating 2,988.01 - - - Other Operating Supplies 1,500.00 - - - Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 262,009.18 $ 111,829.30 $ 112,148.38 $ (319.08) Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees $ - $ - $ 9,261.25 $ (9,261.25) Licenses and Permits - - - - Other Contractual Services 212,859.25 202,216.29 201,623.80 592.49 Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ 212,859.25 $ 202,216.29 $ 210,885.05 $ (8,668.76) Total Capital Expenditures $ 11,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 485,868.43 $ 314,045.59 $ 323,033.43 $ (8,987.84) Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 4,200.00 $ 3,360.00 $ 2,577.33 $ 782.67 Property Appraiser Fees 2,700.00 2,160.00 2,015.21 144.79 Reserves for Operations 22,700.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 29,600.00 $ 5,520.00 $ 4,592.54 $ 927.46 Page 1 of 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 10 of 13 Total Expenditures $ 515,468.43 $ 319,565.59 $ 327,625.97 $ (8,060.38) Net Profitj(Loss) $ - $ 197,226.84 $ 289,734.63 $ 92,507.79 Page 2 of 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 11 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-August 31,2013 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 2,730,821.09 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 1,213,292.10 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 3,944,113.19 Total Assets $ 3,944,113.19 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 6,223.36 Goods Received Inv. Received - Total Liabilities $ 6,223.36 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 2,579,963.60 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 1,357,926.23 Total Fund Balance $ 3,937,889.83 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,944,113.19 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 12 of 13 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-August 31,2013 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Amend Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 2,618,01(49 $ 2,618,011.49 $2,618,011.49 $ - Transfer from Fund 109 General 241,700.00 241,700.00 241,700.00 - Foundation Payment for Crosswalks - - - - Special Assessment 324,400.00 311,424.00 312,714.91 1,290.91 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - Interest 25,700.00 21,416.67 9,846.26 (11,570.41) Total Operating Revenues $ 3,209,811.49 $ 3,192,552.16 $3,182,272.66 $ (10,279.50) Operating Expenditures: Irrigation&Landscaping Hardscape Project(50066) Engineering Fees $ 125,332.12 $ 41,777.37 $ 37,616.30 $ 4,161.07 Other Contractural Services 2,658,333.64 159,500.02 143,105.51 16,394.51 Sprinkler System Repairs - - - - Permits - - - - Electrical - - 2,285.67 (2,285.67) Crosswalk Signal Posts - - 4,290.00 (4,290.00) Landscape Materials 64,550.01 49,703.51 45,537.25 4,166.26 Other Operating Supplies(Pavers) - - - - Other Road Materials - - - - Traffic Sign Restoration Project(50103) Traffic Signs 78,920.00 39,460.00 30,330.00 9,130.00 Lake Bank Project(51026) Swale&Slope Maintenance 170,000.00 119,000.00 104,122.79 14,877.21 Engineering Fees 500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 22,275.72 - - - Total Irrigation&Landscaping Expenditures $ 3,119,911.49 $ 409,440.90 $ 367,287.52 $ 42,153.38 Capital Expenditures: General Improvements $ - $ - $ 38,900.00 $ - Total Capital Expenditures $ - $ - $ 38,900.00 $ 38,900.00 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 10,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 6,225.12 $ 1,274.88 Property Appraiser Fees 6,600.00 4,950.00 4,867.45 82.55 Reserve for Contingencies 55,800.00 - - - Page 1 of 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5b. Administrators Report-Monthly Financial Report Page 13 of 13 Revenue Reserve 17,500.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 89,900.00 $ 12,450.00 $ 11,092.57 $ 1,357.43 Total Expenditures $ 3,209,811,49 $ 421,890.90 $ 378,380.09 $ 43,510.81 Net Profitj(toss) $ - $ 2,770,661.26 $2,803,892,57 $ 33,231.31 Page 2 of 2 .: w,, x :.d�+•'aa ,, .„ ....:�.. "},n- .�,.�, :..r° .., , - .,,,,, ..,.,r,-.-:.1,,' riler` ,)i,'.':-, * a r_Z . . .�� 1 ,r M` ' :. .,b s .,� r Z ( x J sir ar # r ' y f 4 °4 g ''`v, '' ( y'}y yr" P { Z . ** � U C .rye :>. .. ',41(41,*L',:ir,,r„.--:',,:',t,'''.:-',.:',.:;.,';''''''' .;'' ,: '-....' v,,, ` k P D R , 3 r .,,- .r m :- . ,, . r *. -,, tit# :h. A r„., xd 'ten O" #,; ham' N a. sue+g+ �` N 1 Q O. _ . , N N Y } ,. (� L�U CR , . `� N 44. i� ro co, a 7 a n IF e September 5,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-*Beach renourishment permitting and funding Proposed Ordinance amendment incorporating beach renourishment as a purpose of the Pelican Bay Services Division Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit ResnickLisa Page 1 of 2 Subject: Pelican Bay Ordinance Amendment Attachments: Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit.docx From: Neil Dorrill [mailto:Neil @dmctfl.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:29 PM To: Susan O'Brien (naplessusan @comcast.net) Cc: ResnickLisa Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Ordinance Amendment This just received. Lisa please show as part of the agenda index to be reviewed with the Chairman tomorrow. Tx Neil From: KlatzkowJeff[mailto:JeffKlatzkow @collieraov.net] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:07 PM To: OchsLeo Cc: Neil Dorrill; IsacksonMark; NeetVirginia Subject: Pelican Bay Ordinance Amendment Leo: In keeping with our discussion, attached is a proposed amendment of the Pelican Bay MSTBU Ordinance (Municode version). I put it in a form that you could use on the overhead. With the Board's direction, I will put this into ordinance form, and advertise it for the June 11th BCC meeting. (It may have to go on the following meeting, depending on the NDN) Jeffrey A. Klatzkow County Attorney (239)252-2614 September 5,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-*Beach renourishment permitting and funding Proposed Ordinance amendment incorporating beach renourishment as a purpose of the Pelican Bay Services Division Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit Page 2 of 2 Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit. Sec. 122-1654. -Purpose; powers. The unit is formed for the purpose of providing street lighting, water management, beach renourishment, ambient noise management, extraordinary law enforcement service and beautification, including but not limited to beautification of recreation facilities, sidewalk, street and median areas, identification markers, the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas including the restoration of the mangrove forest preserve and to finance the landscaping beautification of only that portion of U.S. 41 from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road in the above-described taxing and benefit unit and to that end shall possess all the powers to do all things reasonably necessary to provide such services. (Ord. No. 02-27, §4, 5-28-02; Ord. No. 2006-05, §2) September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-Beach renourishment permitting and funding(Legal opinion on use of MSTBU funds for beach renourishment) Page 1 of 3 YOUNG VAN ASSENDERP, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 215 South Monroe Street Suite 802 Post Office Box 1833 (ZIP 32302-1833) Tallahassee,Florida 32301 Telephone(850)222-7206 Telecopier(850)561-6834 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Hoppensteadt FROM: Ken vanAssenderp, Esq. DATE: 23 May 2013 SUBJECT: Pelican Bay—Beach Renourishment Your Inquiry Would the use of Pelican Bay MSTBU dollars to renourish beaches within the Pelican Bay PUD (which is the geographic boundary for the MSTBU) constitute use of public dollars for enhancement of private property? Since most of the beach to the mean high water line is private, and access to it is a major concern to protect, the community is very concerned about not setting any precedents that could come back and haunt us. Response Yes, but not illegally. Beach renourishment provided and funded by the County using its MSTBU public funds (taxes; special assessments or non/lien charges) is authorized expressly, even if private property is enhanced thereby, but subject to applicable land use and related zoning regulations including public access. If you wish me to address your concern about access and precedent, I will need more information. Discussion Florida Statute, Section 125.01(1)(q),provides that the power of Collier County to carry on county government includes, to the extent not inconsistent with general or special acts enacted 1 • September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-Beach renourishment permitting and funding(Legal opinion on use of MSTBU funds for beach renourishment) Page 2 of 3 by the Legislature, beach erosion control and other essential municipal services funded by using its financing tool,the Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit("MSTBU"). Municipal services may be provided to property by a county. Often that property, including private property, is enhanced, logically, by the added use and added enjoyment of the property that derives from the municipal services, ranging from roads and street lights to garbage collection and control of beach erosion. The renourishment and protection from erosion of Florida's beaches (even those bordering privately-owned property) is in the public interest, and therefore may be funded legally with public dollars. In regard to Pelican Bay, the use of county dollars from the MSTBU to fund a renourishment project for the beaches within Pelican Bay is a valid and logical source of funding because the municipal purpose of restoration and preservation of those beaches benefits the residents, community of Pelican Bay as a whole and enhances property. The Florida Legislature has declared in Chapter 161, Florida Statutes, that the maintenance and erosion control of Florida's beaches is in the public interest.' As such, beach renourishment projects implemented to reduce the effects of beach erosion may be funded properly with tax dollars. Even so, the funding of such beach renourishment projects remains controversial.2 The main controversy stems from the fact that many payers of taxes, assessments or charges may feel that they should not have to pay for a project that either does not directly benefit them, or dispro- portionately benefits property owned by owners who live on or closer to the beachfront. However,this first argument has less force when there is proper public beach access maintained on these beaches.4 In response to the second argument, it has become much more popular for local governments to fund nourishment projects not only by an MSTBU but also by special districts.5 Certain scholars have also responded to this second argument by advocating for a"value capture property tax"to fund such nourishment projects.6 This type of tax uses a hedonic price function to estimate the implicit value in proximity to the beach then roughly apportions the tax burden of § 161.088,Fla. Stat.,(2012. 2 For a general discussion of controversy over public funding of beach renourishment projects see Jennifer Ludden, Debate Over Rebuilding Beaches Post-Sandy Creates Waves,NPR,(last update Jan.30,2013), http:www.npr.org/2013/01/30/170301306/debate-over-rebuilding-beaches-post-sandy-creates-waves;See also Don Barber,Beach Nourishment Info, Bryn Mawr College Geology Department,(last visited May 10,2013), http:www.brynmawr.edu/geology/geomorph/beachnourishmentinfo.html 3 Id. 4 See Barber, supra note 2. s 6 BEACH,SHORE,AND COASTAL ZONE REGULATION,ELUII FL-CLE 14-1,7 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-Beach renourishment permitting and funding(Legal opinion on use of MSTBU funds for beach renourishment) Page 3 of 3 the project to the approximate benefit that each homeowner receives from the project. [However, as far as our research reveals,this proposed"value capture"tax model has not been implemented in beach nourishment projects, most likely because it would take too much time and effort to implement an individually-apportioned tax for every renourishment project.] In Florida, many beach renourishment projects are financed through a combination of federal, state and local funds.8 Section 161.28, Florida Statutes authorizes County Commissioners "to use any available county funds to meet necessary expenses of its beach and shore preservation program" (emphasis added). Some counties chose to use their Tourist Development tax dollars for beach renourishment projects.9 However, as noted above, many utilize either non-district municipal service units (your MSTBU)or special district funds as well. In regard to Pelican Bay, the use of dollars from the non-district MSTBU for the renourishment of the beaches within Pelican Bay is not only a valid source of funding, but also seems to be the fairest and most logical source of funding for such a project. Because the MSTBU covers all of Pelican Bay, it is really the tax or assessment dollars of its property owners (not just the abutting landowners)that will be funding the project,who will directly benefit from the project. While it is not only in the broader public interest that the beaches in Pelican Bay (as part of the larger Florida Beach system) be restored and protected from erosion, it is also certainly in the best interest of the property owners of Pelican Bay for the maintenance and even the enhancement of the value and market ability of private property and also of the residences for their direct enjoyment. CAVEAT: I have not been asked and have not read or analyzed your PUD in the light of your special beach nourishment question related to access. KvA/jpf 7 George R.Parsons&Joelle Noailly,A value capture property tax for financing beach nourishment project:an application to Delaware's ocean beaches, 47 OCEAN AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT 49(2004). 8 Id. 9 For an example see info on Pinellas county nourishment project funding Coastal Management: Beach Nourishment, PINELLAS COUNTY,FLORIDA,(last visited May 10,2013), http://www.pinel lascounty.org/environment/coastalMngmt/nourishment.htm 3 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-Beach Renourishment permitting&funding-Project Area Information provided by Jim Hoppensteadt on 9/3/2013 Page 1 of 5 ResnickLisa From: James Hoppensteadt [mailto:jimh @pelicanbay.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 3:10 PM To: Neil Dorrill; Jim Powers (jim @dmgfl.com); ResnickLisa Subject: FW: Sand Volume Dispersement Importance: High FYI Sincerely, Jim Hoppensteadt President Chief Operating Officer t. 4 Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. 6251 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, Florida 34108 Tel: 239.260.8460 Cell: 239.398.7074 Fax: 239.597.6927 pelicanbay.org *****The information transmitted is intended only for person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review,dissemination,distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is strictly prohibited.If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ***** From: James Hoppensteadt Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 2:47 PM To: David Cook; 'Jerry Moffatt'; John Chandler; 'Mary Johnson'; Noreen Murray; roboender@icmail.com; Ronnie Bellone (vbellnpls(iyahoo.com); Suzanne Minadeo Cc: Jerri Kautsky; Joel Dekkers; Tanya White; William Bowden; Bridget Nunez Subject: FW: Sand Volume Dispersement Importance: High Below is the sand dispersement calculations from the engineer. Previously we had calculated that the Foundation would pay for approximately 25%, or$336,000, and the PBSD would pay for a little less as they did in 2006, or$1 M. Based on the bid costs of$38.40 per CY and the September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-Beach Renourishment permitting&funding-Project Area Information provided by Jim Hoppensteadt on 9/3/2013 nel 20-ia ineer's calculations,the Foundation's share (markers R-35 & R-36) is 12,477 CY, or$479,117, and the PBSD's share is 22,523 CY or$864,883. The PBSD is scheduled to discuss this at their meeting tomorrow (1 PM at the Community Center); and it is set to go before the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)at their meeting on September 10th for approval of the truck haul solution to beach renourishment. We continue to hear that there are some individuals who have been lobbying Commissioner Hiller to block the PBSD's involvement—to reemphasize- hearsay. Reportedly,their argument is that beach renourishment or erosion control is not within the PBSD ordinance. It is important to remember: 1. The PBSD fully funded this in 2006—there is precedent. 2. The BCC has the sole power to put anything in the PBSD ordinance that is consistent with FL law for MSTBU's—as you can see from the legal opinion we've received (attached), use to the Pelican Bay MSTBU (PBSD)for renourishment of Pelican Bay beaches is wholly appropriate. 3. The PBSD Board voted in May to participate in the beach renourishment effort. As it stands right now,the logistics of the planned renouishment are this: • BCC approval 9/10 • 9/17—Notice to Proceed anticipated to be issued • 9/23—Mobilization operations begin • 10/7—full operations are underway • 1/1/14—estimated project completion The plan is to start the renourishment at the south and work north. The Ritz re-opens October 1st, and they are pushing hard to get the schedule accelerated so the heavy equipment isn't going up and down the beach in front of the re-opened hotel. We will be closing beach access at the Sandpiper while construction is going on, but anticipate that this will create a "spectator event" for which we will keep the F&B operations going for. The County has been monitoring the turtle nests (monitoring report attached), and there are three nests which are anticipated to hatch before October 7th, but are going to have to be closely monitored. The next week is critical to getting much needed sand an Pelican Bay beaches. Sincerely, Jim Hoppensteadt President er Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. 6251 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, Florida 34108 Tel: 239.260.8460 Cell: 239.398.7074 Fax: 239.597.6927 pelicanbay.org *****The information transmitted is intended only for person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review,dissemination, distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is strictly prohibited.If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ***** September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. Administrator's Report-Beach Renourishment permitting&funding-Project Area Information provided by Jim Hoppensteadt on 9/3/2013 Page 3 of 5 From: Sharp, Nicole [mailto:Nicole.SharD©cbi.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 12:04 PM To: James Hoppensteadt Cc: Keehn, Stephen Subject: RE: Sand Volume Dispersement Jim, Below is the proposed breakdown of volumes for the Pelican Bay segment. The volume is based upon the need of sand under the 2006 construction template scaled to meet 35,000 cy for the Pelican Bay Reach. Pelican Bay Profile Volume(C.Y.) R-31 7,814 R-32 4,785 R-33 4,958 R-34 4,966 R-35 7,133 R-36(Half) 3,585 R-36 Taper 1,759 Total 35,000 Please let myself or Steve know if you have any questions. Nicole S.Sharp, P.E. 561-361-3171 f -0 ' S ' r: a) a) i c.‘;, a 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a 0 0'':0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e, C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C G C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m 7 U G C = CO _ i i5 d m a, a, 1 n m m 0 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 a-/ -4 N N N N ,--1 ,-1 ,1 . N ,1 N N N ,--1 0 . . ,-1 ,i ,i ,1 H . ,-1 -I ,-I n N ,--1 a� N N N N ,--1 - -0 \\ p.1 \\\\H \\\\\,-1 O a) M O O ,-1 M 00 t0 O a 01 ,,1 n M n m M N M n C1 ,•1 t0 m fV V1 01 fV O1 a) N n to In t0 O m I, N O N ,-1 ,-1 = u N N M m \ ,•I N N N N \ ,-1 \ N ,-1 \N \ ,-1 ,-1 M ,-1 N \\\\ ,--1 v ,-1 N \ N N N N \ ,-/ ,i ,-1 N N \ E• O.W m m DO Q1 00 00 00 m a0 al O1 W Q1 W 00 m m Q W 00 m m m 00 00 m m M M x x ,. W W 0 0 a) a) 0 U O 2 C O y O E • M o o u1 N m ,N-1 ,�-1 ti M a M P N m V1 M M M M a ,.I M M N ,N-1 ,M-1 ,N.1 N N N M a O e a M N 0 0 0 M M N • Lc-) 00 a) a > > • ✓ - _. , m o u u o_ C C c . m O -, ,i M ,i N n m O ,•1 00 Q1 01 T l0 M a ,••� a M a a n In t0 to ,ti m a ,-1 M a - 00 n ,•i n ,-1 m n n M n CO CO m m a O •0 n t0 In t0 In M t0 a s t0 M M M t0 In n t0 M u1 u1 u1 a M M In M m u1 t0 N 0 a N In N N ,-I M N t0 m a a a M M t0 100 2 ii C C , t me N a) a) 0) v a) E v E E v 0) v 0) v E v a) E ar v 0 ar cu E a) ar ar ar v E N a) E a) E a) E N E a) a, a) a) a) a) a,'a) c C C C C C C C C C C C C c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C) , E L 3 7 7 7 7 O) 7 a) a) 7 7 7 7 7 a) 0 0 a) 7 7 7 7 7 O) 0 7 7 7 7 0 t 7 a) 7 a) 7 a) 7 ') 7 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 �N U -ovvvv .0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -o -ovavvavvvvv .013 -0 -0 .013 -0 , -0 .cv .013 .0 -0 .0vv1-0 -0 -0 -010 -0! o'•5 m m 1 o ...... ' _ U - O0i.c 0 O 0 '•' 0 of L L C d 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y Y m • v N `) '° O C v N N 0 0 7 0 0 `1 N H > C C .,e, ›.. ›. > > C C C > > > C > C O O > IC as 13 0 = O •O a) a) a) O 1a U y y ±, .5 U no t) O O O N 0 0 C O O v 0 0 0 C o o O c C c O m O:Z Z ra m ' 0 ?N > ` c m N m L C Q m m Ic C T C C E •O v a) a0. +O+ O O O O`O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O m O >E> °31 ra C N m /C m ,.- m IC L L U m L - U C • y C _C C C C 0 0 0 "G 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 C) C U m!m CI a - � a ara 70. 0 > UU N m - Ua :O KI v -° v vm > 0 0 o0 TT > >UU TTTUUU ›- u >,m 0 u a 9 l.9 m C 0 03 0 0 0 `, m m c m 'c am) 0) 0`) oc OC o -.IV U -) v >, CO CO .0 CO m > > CO CO m T > > m - CO C C - Y J CO J J N 0 a) a) 7 U CO a) a) a) a) a) m 03 m am-, m m m m 0303 03 m m m 03 a) m m r0 a) c� n m n U m N N L O m c c L L m L L H ~ F- F- F H m a1 ,-i ii) N ,--I m m M M M m m m 01 d ,.-1 u ,-, 0.E E;13 w 0 - O = L m m !._, m f.- r NN T O1 CO 00 CO O O a) . N N o d o ~ 0- > > > 1- t0 t0 In In 1n 1n In a a d d , O y ,i I ,-1 > n n n n n n n n n J -0 E 0 ......E ...„ t Evv ''a) 0) ! g;Q N C C N 2i m 0 t0 to t0 t0 t0 t0 n n n n 00 0) 01 O1 M 0) 0 0 ,-1 0 0 ,-1 0 0 N N N M m m N m 00 0 a a a a a a a a In u1 In N t0 V)0)a- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M m M M M M M m M M M 0c M M M M M M M M M M M M M M m M CC Z Z 0 0 C C I a) a) E E • 0 In to to In an m In In to In In ui to _ In Li) u) ui u) In In uA G t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 n n C1 01 01 • O ,•1 ,-1 ,-1 M 01 .- a a a a an In In t0 O In N N N N N N N n n n CO as N N N O M O O O M M M N N N • M m ° 03'03 M M M m M a a a M M m 0 0 m 2 ' N N N N N N M M M M M M M 2 MIM M M M M MM cC CC EE� Z Z O 0 L L S. 3 up 0 o a t0 000 0 NO M 001 N o IA 001 N O 01 to O� m 00 N N C N N ,-1 ,1 ,i N N N ,--1 N N C ,--1 ,-1 : N v a) I Li. LL . II1 . ° 0 Mr-1 M m M o V1 N m M 0 M In m to 0 0 0[O m Z M M O N O o0 O m a N n N M M M m M n ,--I n 01 00 00[m N N W N N N N e-1 N N N v ! N N N ,-1 ,i ,1 0) a) v UILL . -0 -0 CU a) 0 0 N U) O N U) N o v N N N v UI N o v 0 U N 0 N N o N r = ° N,v) v) U) N N Ur) o N r o N v IE v v a) a W v ar a) 0) v T > C T > C T > > > C T > > C > > > T T C T C > T C T > C > i C >.:T T T > > T C > C > >'.> > > > > ' O t1 a N n M 00 a a a 0 7 a M a O ,-1 0 0 N M n a a n 01 a 00 , 01 a n a L1 m n N o In,C) C O ,-I 0 0 ,-1 Cl= 0 N 1 O .-1 CO 0 ,-1 0 M In M ,•4 0 M a N O 0n 0 t0 m M N 0 0 , M ,i M '0 0 0 ,•I,t0 N,N 1 n a a In N 0 N 0 00; Y In a s a ut u a a a a N N M M M m M N N N N N N N ,-1 ,-1 N ,-1 N ,-1 0 1 0 ,-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 101 0 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,-1 ,-1 ,-11 pa 00 W CO 00 m o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 m W 00 00 CO CO 00 • OO m n0 00 00.00 00 m m 00 m 00 CO 00 C0•00 00 00 00 J C ,i r1 N N N ,--I ,-I ,-I N N ~ ,--I ,--I ,-I ,i N ,--1 ,-I ,-I N N ,--1 ,-1 N ,--I ,-I ,--I ,--I '-4 N C ,-I ,-i ,i ,-I ,-I ,-I ,-I ,i ,i ,i H ,--I ci N ,-I ,-I, O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 m 00 00 CO 0o 0o 0o 00 00 00 0o m m o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 '0 00 00 0o oO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Oo,.oo 00 I O t!1 t0 01 t0 C1 N U1 00 M 00 111 M 0) ,•1 00 a to n t0 CO M M 00 00 t0 M 00 C1 ,•1 In a, tO 01 N 01 m n t0 N m M N 00 0l 00 ,-1 -O 00 N to M N ,-4 00 C) t0 M t0 t0 t0 n V1 M a 00 M C1 00 N In n t0 N a In a 01 -O 00 00 N a a N n C1 O N,O m t0 tC O N N N ,-1 ,•1 N N 00 01 CO CO N a a M m M N O 01 01 01 00 00 00 a a a M m N M O O N 01 0 0 0 00 01 01 i 00 N`n M o a • t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 in In ut In in to to ut tr1 tr1 tr1 ut a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m a a a M m M M M M`N M 0 i- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N _- N N N N N,N N N N N N N N w N N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J O 0 0 0=t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 N 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 C1 m In N 01 to 0 ,-1 m ,•1 00 ,-1 0 ,-1 t0 00 M n a n m t0 a �..1 C1 In N O ,-1 CO t0 T t0 t0 N N N N n 00 n tO C1 00 m O M0) O1 n -1 O-4 ,~-1 ,03.1 01 c�-1 01 O-4 O-1 ,--1 n ,-1 ,M-1 N N 00 ,i ,M-1 n I .M-1 O-4 r/ - ,-1 ,a-1 N 0) Vl 01 ,ai ,i .M-1 ,M-i .a-I �O ,-1 ,a-1 N 1 N ,N-1 ,N-1 ,a-1 ,-1 C Z C 'z m 0) m ,...,.,. ... _... m m rc) M M M M M M M M M m m M M m M M m M m M M m M M m m M m M m m M M m m M nI M M m M m M m m m m 00 N N ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 N ,-1 ,1 ,-1 N N ,-1 ,4 ,-1 N N ,-1 ce cc c-1 ,-1 N ,--1 ,-1 I,•1 ,-1 c-1 c-1 c-1 .-I ,� \\ ,--1 N N \\\\\ i1 ,-I \\ ,--I \\ .--I \ ,--I \\ N \\ ,--I N \ \ ,c \\\,-1 \\\,-1 ,-1 ,-1 \,\\\\\ 0 N N N \\\ N N O1 N N \\� W \NO N \N \ON ON \ ,03-1 N \\1 \N 0 v ,0311 N N \ ,-I N \\\N',M-1 ,'n-I ,a-I N r1 tomt\0t\0 N- N NWWt\0t\OnnWt\ONNNN t\ONNt\ON NI\0 ^ nnn nm 'i01\0 t\O N NNNNNN o \D1,N�nn N 0 m 0 m z Z Z '.. 0 L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 0 L L L L L L L L L IL L L L 1= L L U U U U U U U U U U 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 0 0'0 U 0,0(0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 .0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m •C ra m r0 m m m m m m m m m m ra m ra U a) a) a) v N a) N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) a) a) a) a) a) a) v a) a) a) a) a) a) 0) 0) a) a) U a) a)i 0) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a)1 a);a) a) a) ✓ .0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m v L 0 0103 m m m m m m m m m 0 m 0 0 m U 4- Y,. Y M Y Y F, 4' Y 4., .. . vs .6 :13aaaa :oaaaZa15 :naaaaaaa :aaaEEaaa Y v115 115 :naaaaaaaD',9 E LE 0 v ar ar ar ar ar v v ar ar ar ar ar v v v ar ar ar ar a) ar ar ar ar ar ar ar v v a 0 v av v v v v 0) ) w v ar 1 v v v 0 v -O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c c C C C C C c C c C C c C C -O C C C I c c,C:C C C C C'C C C C C • m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r0 m m'm'm m m m m m m m ro ro ro ro co > > M 1 1 1 1 H f°4 j co[CO#co C co 1 O Co!co IC C co co o C co C O T C a ! c m m m m m m en m [11 N ai •i N N N IY1 N ai N N m n \\'....\\ ''-1 \\\\ "'1 OC N I-I en t!1 t0 n l0 co O ( W = N N N a-I N \N 1 N N \ E CT CT CO O\0 0\O T 0000 0000 0000 CO T .0 a 0 jj 2 n 0 E T m/0? 01 01 N CO N N N t0 c 0 1u m Q U - I N O C- c . o . y C N L^0 ON t71 Cal) Lh$N tanl Ln Val t^0 N 3 OI t C EE N N C C C C C C C C C C 0 0 41 3 7 3 3 7 3 0/?7 t O{7 3 N L .0 - -O -O 'O -D -O '.-O'-O`'B -0 jIII11 1i1 t -c N O > >- >I> >€>'.> >- >: >. >. m m z m m m CO CO m'm m CO CO CO C . > CO 00 03 07 CO 00 0] m 00 CD CO tp m C C C C C C C C C C C ? p_ m m m m CO CO m m m (0'CO CO a� u_ u U u' u u ulu u u CO N V 01 v v Cl Cl' N CJ 0/'G1 G/ Gl CO 0_ 0_ 0_ 0. O. 0. 11 a a 0. 0. N 0 7.)0_ m t i E a IO at Q 0 N V 0 lD VD up N N. n CO N N N 00 00 (O C)G_ m m m m m m m m m m m m I V1 V1 to to to•m m m m m N • m m m m m m m V1 a M .-I 1TIi1 v o 0 o v o cu o C> y i , 1 ; pI 1 , 00'N a r-1 en LO-en N e-I .-I 01 a CON m'm N'r-1 N N 01 0 CY1 T CII T T T T F2, T T co T a--1 r-1 y ati=ati r-1 -1 .-N-00 a-I a--I a-I N 00 00 CO OO,CO 00,CO CO CO CO 00 1-1'N ai ai r-i .-1/q4 r1 N a♦ e4 N CO CO.00 00 00 00.00 00 00`00 00 00 r-I en m 01 lD r-1 V1 n m .-1 c-I T T 1 m'T O CO .- m m 7 r N Ni a V1 a m .--1 r-! 1-100000101 m m m m m m m m m m:N N N N¢N N N N N N N N:N,N 1D 10 LD LD lD LD LD Lb LD 10 LSD LD N N N N N N N N N N N N o N Lb LO T T V1 O N `-I T . Cr, Lb T',ri LD N.CO 01 r_, N m m'm'm m m m en mm m m 1--1 ■-■ r-1 . . . . . a--1 N N a--1 In a LA 10 00 0 n T N 00 e-I ss- r-1 N N N N N N N N N a--I \ k - _C.0 - C .0 - C C .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 U u u U U U U U U m 03 C0 m m m m m m CO CO CO CJ CU CJ:N 01 0l 0) N Cl U U U c0 m CO:.03 Cl OO on:CO CO CO Cl CO 1 aa � .0 .0 ',L i e u 0) 0) 0) 0 0) 0 0) 0) 0) 0)N v N -a 1:3 1:5 13 .0 ..13 .0 13 13 '0 C C C C C C C C C!C/C C m,CO CO m m m m' m m'.m CO CO >'-> >:> > > > > > > > > PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AND PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION BOARDS JOINT SESSION WEDNESDAY,MAY 8,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division and Pelican Bay Foundation Boards met in Joint Session on Wednesday,May 8,2013 at 2:00 p.m.at the Community Center at Pelican Bay,8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples,Florida. The following members were present: Pelican Bay Services Division Board Tom Cravens,Chairman John Iaizzo Dave Trecker,Vice Chairman absent Michael Levy Joe Chicurel Susan O'Brien Frank C.Dickson,II absent Scott Streckenbein John Domenie Hunter Hansen absent Pelican Bay Foundation Board David Cook Robert Pendergrass,Chairman Mary Johnson Ronnie Bellone Jerry Moffatt John Chandler Noreen Murray absent Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator Mary McCaughtry,Operations Analyst Kyle Lukasz,Operations Manager absent Lisa Resnick,Recording Secretary Pelican Bay Foundation Staff Jim Hoppensteadt,President&Chief Operating Officer Suzanne Minadeo,Executive Assistant Also Present Kevin Carter,Field Manager,Dorrill Management Group James Claypoole,President's Council Bill Klauber,President,Pelican Bay Property Owners Association Eric Staats,Naples Daily News 18 in the audience AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Discussion regarding beach renourishment 4. Audience Comments 5. Adjourn ROLL CALL Seven members of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board were present (Cravens, Chicurel, Domenie,Iaizzo,Levy,O'Brien,Streckenbein)and three members were absent(Dickson,Hansen,Trecker). Six members of the Pelican Bay Foundation Board were present (Pendergrass, Bellone, Chandler, Cook,Johnson,Moffatt). DISCUSSION REGARDING BEACH RENOURISHMENT Mr. Hoppensteadt explained the County did not include Pelican Bay in its upcoming beach renourishment permit request, but was included in the County's bid for 35,000 cubic yards because the Foundation had engineers evaluate the Pelican Bay segment of the beach. The engineers offered two design 8611 I Pelican Bay Services Division and Pelican Bay Foundation Boards Joint Session Wednesday,May 8, 2013 options: 1) baseline design standard that identified "hot spots" located at R-35 and R-36. However, there were reports of erosion along Bay Colony and Clam Pass Park beaches as well; and 2) 2006 permitted template volume that would use a recent survey to rebuild the 2006 design. PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION BOARD MOTION#1 Mr.Chandler made a motion,second by Mr.Moffatt,that the Pelican Bay Foundation believes that the beaches south of the Ritz and north of Clam Pass should be renourished as needed at this time in conjunction with the County's beach renourishment effort The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MOTION#1 Mr. Streckenbein made a motion, second by Chairman Cravens that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board believes that the beaches south of the Ritz and north of Clam Pass should be renourished as needed at this time in conjunction with the County's beach renourishment effort The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. The main topic of concern was who should pay for beach renourishment.In 2006,TDC funds paid for beach renourishment from south of the Ritz to north of the Contessa, and Pelican Bay Services Division paid more than$1,000,000 for renourishment from the Contessa south to about 1,500 feet south of the Sandpiper facility. The Foundation Board supported the Services Division taking the lead and levy of an assessment to pay for beach renourishment within the Pelican Bay Unit. Some argued if renourishment by the Services Division was acceptable within the conservation area, then responsibility for renourishment outside of the conservation area should be based on beach ownership. Mr.Dorrill estimated payment of 32,000 cubic yards at$30 per cubic yard would increase the annual assessment by$133 per unit. PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MOTION#2 Dr.Chicurel made a motion,second by Chairman Cravens that the Services Division take responsibility for beach renourishment from the point in which TDC funding ends south of the Ritz to R-37,excluding the beach in front of the Foundation's property at R-35 and R-36. The Board voted 6-1 in favor and the motion passed. Ms.O'Brien opposed. PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION BOARD MOTION#2 Mr.Cook made a motion,second by Mr.Moffatt that the Pelican Bay Foundation should pay to renourish the beach in front of the Foundation's properties in front of R-35 and R-36. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ms.Marcia Cravens,Dr.Ted Raja,Mr.James Claypoole,Ms.Cathy Annacone,Mr.Bob Naegele,and Mr. Kim Rosenberg supported Pelican Bay as a Unit being included in the County's beach renourishment project and general cost-sharing plans discussed. 8612 Pelican Bay Services Division and Pelican Bay Foundation Boards Joint Session Wednesday,May 8,2013 PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION BOARD MOTION#3 Mn Cook made a motion,second by Mr Moffatt that the Pelican Bay Foundation supports the leadership position of the Pelican Bay Services Division in the beach renourishment project to protect the shorelines of our community. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. ADJOURN Mn Domenle made a motion,second by Mr.Streckenbein,to adjourn. The Board voted unanimous in vor,the motion assed,and meetin ad ourned at 4:54 ..m. Tom Cravens,Chairman---- Minutes by Lisa Resnick 5/31/2013 1:47:48 PM 8613 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 1 of 11 ''gX. k.. Clam Pass - ; 90-day Post Dredging Update • ' Humiston&Moore Engineers Date of aerial:Aug 23,2013 Clara Pass 90-day Post Dredging Monitoring r • Monthly Aerial Photos • 3-month post data collection 3 • Hydrographic Survey • Flow Measurements State of Clam Pass A • Tidal flow and hydraulic stability • Inlet Morphology 4. Findings and Recommendations .. / • ,Aug 2013 1 5e.SeptembAdmier nistrator 4,2013's Pelican Report-Bay Clam Services Pass Division Board Update Regular Session Monitoring Page 2 of 11 Aerial photos ti. , = �, '`.. ^ate -."- e +i .w ''Y �^z 7:::',.... p;1 ;4 C x F is�. Ma 2093 ' ■ y June 2013 July 2093 Pre Dredging conditions (Jail, 2013) , ,r, " ' - VitC--:4".4....iii-,*---5 ' '''''' ' •V T.- r 4; f: a s ''''''::: -,- , . :- .7;'--‘ 4 ,,i,,:::__::..,,,,,.‘,...,,-,..'"....,, ,,--,,,,4,iity4A,4::. ..3'7.-..,i,...";44''''''''' .1- '' s7 a^ 41'X°„4`? s.'3 n,.i i"'.',.:1 t . c' U4 5e.September Administrato 4,2013 r's Pelican Report-Bay Clam Services Pass Monitor Division ing Board Update Regular Session Page 3 of 11 Inlet Dredging( Munch, 2013) '"" " a t Post dredging Survey Scope (Aug 4, 2013) • �� � ,y. M1la • , . , . . , .,........ _, ,,_,,t , .._4,4,...;:;,,,,..„,.,7:-.,,,..",„:„„:„4,,:„.„.........2„,,....,.,t.•.., .,,,, .,-,•::::::,:.,....,-,..,.. .. .. .. . . ..,..„„.. ..... .., 3 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 4 of 11 Morphology (Pre-dredging) - - . 4+y y/ oe tith C� SSA , ,' r. ' wi _4. %.. ]8 4 „5 g "` "rill , so .tir{ J n xt E n 3 ✓ Morphology (Post Dredging) �.`, A' fit. .fir ' .« tY 1?` F t . \ 4a,, Tit8 o . ? m ..7 4 y.k a s.a ss � i o • s. S2 L 4 b fla 8.8 4 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 5 of 11 Morphology change (pre to post dredging,) f'4 VI' " : " ' . ' ',-, st:1F-'1..--,,,,,„ ilk. '6 -" ! o ff { 1A t� .. ice`. E 22 �,v 4 'ice,.. } ` A i A y w 02 m • Morphology (4-months Post dredging) rT err 1 b e , Jx— 0.8 , b Sfiw HA +a as 5 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 6 of 11 Morphology cli(Inge ( 4;,, post dredging 'A ' ,.-.-''*%, 1, 1.,,, ,,,,,,,,„ . li ..., 4, ,„,„ . ,.. . „ ... ��.. { r a t '� { 'B^F„4. ®®®® — � stn,.' .,�y, � LL_ 1 -02 m a � vJi6 1$ > ac W a ... i � ae i.' Post dredging Sufwe ' Scope (A tilt 4, 2013) '3 f � �� a, �s 6 l a .c<:1::11).'"A'..1 d u 4(1-';'''''""..4 fie " i '$ 1 ,,./-,4,-..,,,,4 -1,.. ; 8 i' September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 7 of 11 Inlet Profile change Sec A Inlet Throat t, - P61 1/12/2013 STA 1+50 POST 3/16/2013 POST 4/23/2013 I. 4 ��POSr 6/4/2.. Q 4 g 2 4010111tHw(+0.33) E -4 -a _1. NORTH SOUTH -12 -400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 - 0 DISTANCE FROM BASELINE(FEET) Inlet Profile change Sec A Inlet Channel (3+30) e P6t 1/12/20+1 $16 5+30 POST 6 3/16/1013 -PO31 4/10/2013 4 POST 8/2/2013 _,.. 2 818(w.5)9 • 1...4/, -6 -10 NORTH SOUTH -12 -400 -350 - •• -250 -200 -150 -100 - DISTANCE PROM BASH14E(FEET) 7 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 8 of 11 Inlet Profile change Sec B Flood shoal (4+60) 0' ---^-PRE 1/12/2013 5Th 4+60 -----_POST 3/16/2013 4 POST 8/4/2013 2 Z. NNw(10.35') 040(-1.6C') =CC—2 F-4 —1. } NORTH SOUTH T,et —12 —200 —150 —100 — 0 50 1.0 1 0 2.0 ''. CISTANCE PROM BASELINE (FEET) Inlet Profile change • r• TAI Sec c Flood shoal(9+50) --PRE 12013 STA 9+50 2/11 6 POST 3/11/2013 4 POST 1/4/2013 2 MMW(.0.331 5 —6 —10 WEST EAST —12 -200 —150 —100 —0 • 0 110 1 0 210 DISTANCE FROM BASEUR (FEET) 8 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 9 of 11 State of Clain Pass 44111,„ , . . liktiv . State of Clain Pass Tidal flow and hydraulic stability )10. -, r.q fit Clam Bay Model ; ' WL(0m, i '# W- Water levels � x, " a 33 0.26 0.03 f ,3 y .. -0.2 -0.3 -0.83 l'''. '' ''''' '; + k 1 A 4 try x t Model Domain High tide Low tide 9 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 10 of 11 Clain Pass tidal flow 4 "V. 0.9 0.66 0.66 0.0 E 0.42 • . 0.16 0 28 sad: 01 .6r2w'y�y' ..��L ' Max Flood Tide Condition Clam Pass tidal flow g 09 t, 3 0.14 0.66 0-68 0.6 0.42 034 68 01 Max Ebb Tide Condition 10 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Page 11 of 11 Clam Pass tidal flow n*A :, e a 4 «4ti.3 ��� � i 0.9 1 0.2 s� i � � � 0784 066 °s, ' -- 0.50 t i7` 0 42 034 0.26 .A ° 0.18 0.1 14kta,.. 0-Y .ca. � 1 . q._ Ebb Tide Condition (below MLW) ,r ., -:c,,,:.. _:, .. ' 7 Pc--: ' . Clam Pass � - 90-day Post Dredging Update Humiston& Moore Engineers Date of aerial:Aug 23,2013 11 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update-Aerial Photographs of Clam Pass taken 8/23/2013 Page 1 of 4 • PIOa , fir .. AIN o v a xk� » ., --, DSC5126 DSC5127 r ,'' —,_,..*„.: ..sr , r� a . sa . y _DSC5128 _DSC5129 &r. A z g; „d x. .c _ <. _DSC5130 _DSC5131 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update-Aerial Photographs of Clam Pass taken 8/23/2013 Page 2 of 4 F u - v 9 # i" ; / _DSC5132 _DSC5133 y ..- mom:: _DSC5134 _DSC5135 4 _DSC5136 _DSC5137 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update-Aerial Photographs of Clam Pass taken 8/23/2013 Page 3 of 4 R�. _DSC5138 _DSC5139 ♦" • • _DSC5140 DSC5141 rn ° ■.,w• • • a a „p r ~� 1 d L _DSC5142 _DSC5143 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session + 5e. Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Monitoring Update Aerial Photographs of Clam Pass taken 8/23/2013 Page 4 of 4 x ,�3 y �� � 4. F ' x a' i rt _DSC5144 _DSC5145 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5f. Board of County Commissioners Budget Hearing/Thurs.,Sept.5 at 5:05 PM-Correspondence received 9/4/2013 Page 1 of 1 p t RECEIVED 8-26-13 ` . 42013 Collier County Board of Commissioners PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 801 Laurel Oak Dr. Ste 605 Naples, FL 34108 Gentlemen: I wish to...express my. strong objection to being required,-- ast— _ . . .._ will, to pay any assessment fee AT ALL to rip out the perfectly adequate and very attractive foliage that adorns the sound barrier berms separating the Pelican Bay property from U.S. 41A. It has server that purpose well and remains very robust and healthy to this date. I purchased property in Pelican Bay (unit 1805 at the St. Marissa Condominium, 6573 Marissa Loop) with no thought of ever beig required to pay for someone else's idea of a beautification program, that is needed only in the minds of a few, but certainly not the majority, of the property owners in Pelican Bay. My vote is "NO" and I hope you will consider my objection seriously. Robert T. Phillips rphillips4321@sbcglobal.net • September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 1 of 14 CH2M HILL 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 505 i Naples,FL 34108 RIPC H2M H I LL Tel 239.596.1715 Fax 239.596.2579 August 8,2013 Mr. Kyle Lukasz Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive,Suite 605 Naples,Florida 34108 Subject: Clam Bay Stormwater Sampling Proposal Qualifications Dear Mr. Lukasz: Thank you for allowing us an opportunity to propose on the referenced project. As requested,please find attached additional information on project staffing and our qualifications for this work. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. We look forward to working with you and the county on this project. Sincerely, CH2M HILL /W (5mkI William D. Beddow,PE Vice President September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session • 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 2 of 14 CH2MHILL's Watershed and Water Quality Related Assessment Capabilities CH2M HILL offers comprehensive services in assessing,designing and implementing innovative strategies for watershed assessment and water quality compliance. We have extensive experience with water quality standards and have assisted a variety of clients and organizations in the development of cost-effective approaches to address existing water quality issues, pending regulations, and associated effluent limits. Our key services include: • Water Quality Monitoring(Discharge and receiving water) • Watershed Assessments and Planning • Water Quality Standards • Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) • NPDES Permit Compliance • MS4 Compliance • Integrated Municipal Stormwater and Wastewater Planning • Green Infrastructure/Low Impact Design • Water Quality Credit Trading • Use Attainability Analyses/Site Specific Limit Investigations • Economic Impact Analyses • Lake and Reservoir Modeling • Stream, River,and Estuarine Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Modeling • Mixing Zone Modeling • Stormwater and Collection System Modeling • Watershed Related GIS Capabilities The diversity of existing water quality issues and pending regulatory requirements has made compliance with water quality criteria very challenging for industries, local governments, and utilities. Requirements for meeting total maximum daily loads (TMDLs)for impaired waterbodies,and changes in standards or criteria for nutrient, mineral,and related parameters,are causing wastewater and stormwater permittees to evaluate potentially costly improvements to their facilities. CH2M HILL's approach for addressing these issues is to focus on a comprehensive evaluation of conditions and management alternatives to meet changing regulatory requirements. Analysis of water quality can provide insight into the existing conditions of a waterbody and is commonly used by States to determine whether the designated uses of a waterbody are being met. CH2M HILL has extensive experience in collecting and interpreting water quality data.An in-depth understanding of water quality standards is required to assess conditions and to determine what point and non-point management strategies meet specific goals.Watershed and receiving water quality modeling is often needed to predict how effective management strategies will be in meeting water quality targets. CH2M HILL's Watershed and Water Quality Management core technology supports our client projects and initiatives to respond to multiple driving regulations,which include:the Clean Water Act(CWA)and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program,state watershed 1 • September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 3 of 14 management regulations, Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC), and TMDLs. CH2M HILL's watershed and water quality technologists assist our clients in developing strategies and executing projects to maximize the value of their watershed protection investments to enable them to achieve multiple environmental benefits for their dollars spent. Watershed and Water Quality Assessment and Management provides a broad group of services that characterize and assess watersheds and develop protection and restoration strategies based on monitoring programs, hydrologic, hydraulic, and watershed pollutant modeling,stream assessment, public outreach and policy development, permit compliance, nutrient management strategies,and water quality trading.This breadth of knowledge is critical in watershed management planning to understand and account for the full range of impacts and interactions of recommended solutions. Our engineers and scientists can select potential watershed-based solutions that are cost-effective and provide ancillary environmental benefits. Using a multidisciplinary team of engineers,scientists, economists, and planners,CH2M HILL develops innovative alternatives such as watershed based permitting,water quality credit trading, use attainability analyses (UAA), and site specific limits. In many cases,watershed and/or water quality modeling is a core component in assessing the efficacy of alternative management strategies in reducing pollutant loadings from the watershed and to determine the impact on receiving water quality as a result of changes in point and nonpoint source pollutant loadings.The type of modeling that is performed depends on the questions that need to be answered,the type of system,and the pollutant of concern. CH2M HILL has significant expertise in the wide range of industry standard models,from simple spreadsheet based approaches to complex, dynamic multidimensional models. In conducting ambient condition assessments as well as developing appropriate regulatory strategies and watershed management alternatives,we combine the talents of local staff conversant with parochial issues with globally-based subject matter experts who have decades of experience in delivering implementable solutions to water quality-based problems faced by local governments as well as the private sector. We are expert at finding ways to cost-effectively achieve compliance with state and federal water quality standards. In our history of delivering projects around the globe,we have seen that taking social, economic, and environmental elements into consideration throughout the project life cycle can deliver strong business value,while strengthening an organization's relationship with customers, employees, and the community.We invite you to tap into our local as well as global staff resources as you manage your water quality-based issues for watersheds and receiving waters under your jurisdiction. Relevant Examples of Experience in Water Quality-Based Issues Management In Florida, CH2M HILL has provided water quality-based issues management support services requiring a blend of engineering and scientific expertise to governmental as well as private sector clients for many decades. Relevant experience includes developing and conducting storm-event based discharge monitoring programs in support of the Stormwater NPDES Permit for the City of Miami, and similar rainfall-driven monitoring of stormwater pumping into Lake Okeechobee from various lakeside surface water management"298"taxing districts. In support of private sector permittee interests with NPDES discharge limitations,we are currently conducting surface water monitoring of discharges into the Suwanee River and Lake Parker addressing metal translator issues focused on demonstrating compliance with copper water quality standards for ambient surface waters. On behalf of Tohopekaliga 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 4 of 14 Water Authority(TWA),we remain responsible for a decades-long ambient water quality as well as biological monitoring program assessing effects of discharges into receiving wetlands and surface waters. CH2M HILL has been the NPDES consultant for the Ports of Tampa,Canaveral and Miami since the inception of each port's NPDES program. Our collaborative efforts with our clients are important in preventing any potential for administrative penalties associated with non-compliance. For all of these water quality monitoring programs on behalf of our clients,we rigidly adhere to Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Quality Assurance Plans required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. These SOPs address in situ data collection, including appropriate field meter calibration, as well as appropriate chain of custody records documentation and coordination of laboratory analyses with NELAP certified subconsultant firms. We have an established network of working relationships with appropriately certified analytical laboratories in the State addressing chemical analysis of water,sediments,and biological tissues,as needed to support particular environmental monitoring program scope elements. It is important to note that the value added by CH2M HILL engineers and scientists is our focus not lust on proper sampling,analysis, and documentation steps needed to protect data integrity, but on the ultimate disposition and application of the data produced by water quality monitoring programs. The above examples of historical or ongoing water quality monitoring programs are driven by regulatory issues associated with NPDES permit compliance, and evaluation of regulatory strategies for meeting NNCs and/or specific TMDL targets established in Basin Management Action Plans (BMAPs) here in Florida. Our nationally-recognized subject matter experts have been responsible for similarly strategic and regulatory-based programs across the country, representative examples of which include the following: • In support of the Everglades Restoration Program,CH2M HILL conducted a research and demonstration study of Periphyton-based Stormwater Treatment Areas (PSTAs)as a phosphorus reduction treatment technology. The work was performed for South Florida Water Management District as an element of its efforts to identify appropriate watershed-level treatment strategies for achieving compliance with water-quality based ecosystem restoration criteria. We worked closely with the District,the FDEP, and representatives of the Department of Interior/Everglades National Park in designing and implementing the monitoring and assessment program on which treatment technology performance was evaluated over a 5-year testing period. • As part of the NPDES requirements for both wastewater and stormwater permits, Forsyth County(Georgia)was required to conduct various watershed and stormwater management activities, including development and implementation of an environmental monitoring plan. The plan was designed to characterize ambient conditions, identify and investigate water quality impairments and improvement strategies,address requirements for 303(d)stream segments, and monitor the effectiveness of watershed management activities over time.The program included long-term monitoring of a traditional suite of ambient water quality parameters under both wet and dry weather conditions,short-term discharge effects focused on bacteriological 3 • September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 5 of 14 discharge effects,dry weather outfall screening,and biological conditions assessment. CH2M HILL has supported the County's water quality-based investigations since their inception in 2000. • In Utah,we are managing a 3 year research program monitoring 33 inflows to a large 45 sq mile wetland area on Great Salt Lake. We designed the program,and the USGS and the state div of water quality have implemented it. Information generated by this research program is to support development of watershed management strategies for improving habitat quality for the millions of shorebirds and waterfowl utilizing this lake as critical foraging habitat. • For a very high-profile Superfund clean-up site,we conducted the Gowanus Canal Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study in Brooklyn, New York. Field studies designed to confirm site conditions and support remedial action planning included ambient surface water,soil/sediment, and groundwater monitoring along the canal,and specifically addressed tidal influences. Combined sewer overflow evaluations included considerations of both dry and wet weather discharge contributions to the canal. Parameters of concern included metals, PCBs, PAHs,and other pollutants which had accumulated in this highly urbanized canal contaminated by a variety of anthropogenic sources. These selected project examples document our firm's diverse expertise in both developing as well as conducting rigorous water quality monitoring programs designed to meet a broad range of client needs associated with ambient water quality conditions assessment. CH2M HILL Florida-based as well as national subject matter experts are available to support water quality monitoring project planning and implementation,as well as documentation of the effects of watershed or site management actions designed to improve water quality conditions leading to environmental system integrity and surface water use attainment. Proposed Project Staff Our proposed project team for the Clam Bay stormwater monitoring project will be led by Rick Gorsira. Rick is a senior environmental scientist and specializes in water quality and sediment sampling programs for marine, estuarine, and freshwater systems. Mr. Gorsira is a proficient project manager leading environmental projects from inception to completion. His project management skills include formulating concepts and solutions, procurement and management of subcontractors, providing leadership and guidance for project teams, budgeting and cost control, resolving technical conflicts and providing innovative solutions for a wide range of clients. His projects involve ecological assessments, stormwater, surface water and sediment sampling design,wetland delineation and wildlife assessments in the southeastern United States, Latin America, and Caribbean. He has designed upland and wetland mitigation areas and has been involved in mitigation banking projects. He also has extensive experience in aerial photo-interpretation,ground surveys for avian, herpetofaunal,and mammalian species, assessments and relocation of gopher tortoise populations, and sampling of benthic invertebrate and demersal fish communities. Bill Beddow, PE will serve as the principal in charge of the project. As Vice President and Manager of the CH2MHILL's Naples office, Mr. Beddow can bring whatever resources that may be needed for this 4 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 6 of 14 project to insure its success. Mr Beddow will represent CH2MHILL's work to the Board as may be required. Resumes Richard C Gorsira Environmental Scientist Education B.S.,Zoology, University of Florida Professional Registrations Wetland Delineator(provisional), U.S Army Corps of Engineers HAZWOPER 40—hour USCG small boat handling and navigation Advanced Open Water SCUBA diver,Scuba International Distinguishing Qualifications • Management of numerous projects involving ecological assessments,stormwater and surface water and sediment sampling design,wetland delineation and wildlife assessments in the southeastern United States, Latin America,and Caribbean for public/private clients • Marine and freshwater wetland and upland habitat mitigation and restoration design, aerial photo- interpretation,avian, herpetofaunal,and mammalian species,assessments and relocation of gopher tortoise populations, and sampling of marine and estuarine benthic invertebrate and demersal fish communities • Experienced in preparation of EAs and EISs under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • Highly proficient in managing and operating vessels, navigation and boating safety, and development of sampling protocols Representative Projects Estuarine/Marine Water Quality Assessments and Mixing Zone Evaluations Mr. Gorsira manages a metal translator study for Lakeland Electric for the development of alternative surface water quality criteria for copper.This precedent setting study in the State of Florida involved collecting monthly data of total and dissolved copper in association with other parameters to establish an alternative copper criterion based on the dissolved fraction.The study involved preparation of a sampling and analysis plan, negotiation with FDEP, plume tracking technology using window-shade drogues and GPS technology as required by the translator study.This study was successfully completed and the study gained FDEP approval resulting in a 48 percent increase of the effluent limit for copper. Mr. Gorsira is provided assistance with the preparation of an Environmental Report (ER)and Site Certification Application (SCA)for a proposed closed cycle nuclear power plant in Levy County, Florida. Responsibilities include acquisition of fisheries (beach seines,trawls,gill nets, cast nets, minnow traps), water quality,sediment chemistry, and benthic invertebrate samples and presentation of data in the reports. 5 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 7 of 14 Mr. Gorsira served as Quality Control Analyst and Project Scientist for the Ave Maria Reclaimed Water System Wetland Storage Project, performed for Ave Maria Utilities Company LLC in Collier County, Florida. He conducted routine monitoring of the water quality,vegetation,soils,fish, invertebrate, wildlife and surface and groundwater water levels of hydrologically-impacted cypress and marsh wetlands near Immokalee in Collier County FL. Responsibilities included field platform maintenance,well sampling, logistics planning,water quality sampling and quality control review,vegetation and wildlife data collection,office data base input and quality control review, analysis, and report preparation. Mr. Gorsira managed a mixing zone evaluation for an industrial discharge to the Alafia River,Tampa Bay, Florida. Cargill Fertilizer's permit contained an allowance for five metals and proposed operational changes required the development of a new mixing zone model and the collection of new ambient river and effluent data. Mr. Gorsira developed a sampling plan for approval by Florida Department of Environmental Protection using trace metal sampling techniques (EPA Method 1669)during several tidal cycles. As project manager, Mr. Gorsira assisted Florida Power Corporation with data collection for a stormwater NPDES program at four power plant sites in Florida. Outfalls and drainage basins were identified during field inspections of each power plant.A stormwater sampling handbook was provided to the client to provide guidance on sampling methodology and collection of other data for completing permit forms. Mr. Gorsira is currently managing monitoring of wetland habitat to assess the impact of water withdrawals of two well fields for Bonita Springs Utility, Lee County, Florida as part of a Consumptive Use Permit. He is leads bi-annual assessment of vegetation and hydrologic response to operation of the wells located in the Tamiami aquifer. Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM)assessments are performed on a bi-annual basis to determine the effects of well field operation during the dry and wet season. He successfully negotiated with the South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)to reduce monitoring requirements resulting in significant cost savings to the client. Mr. Gorsira served as field program manager for a multi-year 301(h)waiver study for the Carolina, Bayamon/Puerto Nuevo,Aguadilla,Arecibo,and Ponce WWTPs in Puerto Rico.This large, complex program involved sampling of influent and effluent streams of the WWTPs, benthic populations and sediments, receiving water,fish communities,and documentation of coral communities. He directed monthly and quarterly sampling activities, coordinated sampling vessels, laboratory analysis, and provided oversight of daily tasks to scientific crew. Deployed acoustic doppler current profiler(ADCP) and retrieved data at the end of the deployment period.As part of this program, Mr. Gorsira participated in multiple research cruises onboard the OSV Anderson with the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)to demonstrate innovative plume tracking technologies developed by Mr. Gorsira to reduce analytical cost to the overall program. Mr. Gorsira managed an industrial discharge compliance project for the Cargill Fertilizer Bartow Facility in Polk County, Florida. He supported a detailed evaluation of conductivity levels in the discharge as part of operational changes associated with closure of the gypsum stack at the facility and excessive rainfall events. Mr. Gorsira successfully negotiated a compliance agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. As project manager, Mr. Gorsira directed a water quality study and mixing zone evaluation of a once- through cooling water discharge at the C.D. McIntosh and Larsen Memorial Power Plants to determine 6 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 8 of 14 the source of elevated copper concentrations within Lake Parker, Polk County, Florida. CH2M HILL conducted a mixing zone analysis that demonstrated that the available dilution in Lake Parker was sufficient to qualify for a mixing zone. Mr. Gorsira employed ultra-clean field sampling techniques (EPA 1669 Method)to characterize influent,effluent,and ambient lake conditions. Mr. Gorsira has provided assistance with field activities to implement a one-year water quality and quantity monitoring program to develop a water and nutrient budget for Lake Panasoffkee in Sumter County, Florida.This study,funded by the Southwest Florida Water Management District Surface Water Improvement and Management(SWIM) program, determined the status of water quality,source of nutrients,extent of loadings,the contribution of groundwater, and characterized pollutant loads from stormwater runoff and septic tank leachate. Mr. Gorsira was responsible for compliance monitoring for the Hillsborough County Aviation Authority after the construction of Airside"F" at Tampa International Airport.The monitoring involved collection of storm event and base flow water quality samples prior to discharge to waters of the state.The data was compiled and presented in a technical memorandum to the Aviation Authority for submittal to the regulatory agencies. Mr. Gorsira assisted the City of West Palm Beach in a feasibility analysis on routing surface drainage through a 640-acre parcel as part of the Water Catchment Area (WCA),the City's water supply. Mapping of wetland and upland communities,exotic species cover,determination of wetland hydroperiods, and assessment of protected plant and animal species were conducted to evaluate potential impacts of the proposed project on biological resources in the WCA.This information will be used to develop a framework and criteria for evaluating similar systems for incorporation into the WCA. Mr. Gorsira coordinated and obtained a renewal of a NPDES permit for the emergency discharge of brine wastes of a reverse osmosis plant in Englewood, Florida. Historical data review and performance data were critical components to obtain specific waivers established by the permitting agencies for issuance of the permit. Mr. Gorsira served as team leader for a long term field sampling program for the RCRA and CERCLA investigations at numerous sites located in Vieques, Puerto Rico.These investigations included sampling of surface and subsurface soils,sediments,groundwater, and surface water systems, in addition to estuarine lagoons.These tasks included management of numerous subcontractors,suppliers, and laboratories. Liaison with regulators from EPA Region II and Puerto Rico EQB, including involvement of the public,were required at all levels to maintain effective communication among all team members. The program successfully passed an EPA audit during sample collection of all media. Close coordination was required with subcontractors to avoid unexploded ordinance (UXO)and strict sampling protocols were developed and adhered to in order to collect samples at the sites on the East and West side of the island. Mr. Gorsira assisted with U. S. Coast Guard(USCG)Aid to Navigation (ATON) Battery risk evaluation project conducted in Tampa Bay, Florida. He assisted with prototype investigations of sediments at multiple locations within the bay which resulted in a national strategy for the USCG to address the battery disposal issue. Mercury was the major contaminant of concern and the sampling results of sediment,water and biota were used to build a model of the various systems to evaluate potential risk from mercury.The Coast Guard was under national scrutiny and involved review of each step by a science advisory board which included regulators and academicians specializing in mercury. 7 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 9 of 14 Mr. Gorsira was field team leader for a 2-year Water Quality Based Effluent Limitations (WQBEL)study on behalf of Tropicana Products.This study was conducted as an element of industrial operations/NPDES permit renewal under the requirements of Chapter 62-620, FAC.The study included collection of wet and dry season ambient water quality and assessment of sediments and seagrass cover in the Braden River, Manatee County, FL,deployment and retrieval of S4 current velocity meters for the performance of mixing zone modeling. Mr. Gorsira was lead scientist to determine the extent of possible metals contamination in sediment and lake water at Dock 45, Fort Davis located on Lake Gatun, Panama. Lake Gatun is part of the Panama Canal and serves as a potable water supply.The objective of the investigation was to determine the extent of potential contamination and to perform a screening level risk assessment.Surface water and sediment sampling were performed by Mr. Gorsira at grid-specific locations near the dock and at background stations in the lake.This project also involved the preparation of a site-specific health and safety plan (HSP). Mr. Gorsira was a field team leader on studies of receiving water quality issues of the Gasparilla Island Water Association (GIWA) Water Treatment Plant effluent (reverse osmosis brine concentrate)to aquatic organisms. Mr. Gorsira performed sample collection of surface water and sediments to evaluate the relative effects of RO brine discharge on estuarine receiving waters. He participated in meetings with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regarding resolution of permitting issues. Mr. Gorsira has been involved with the Lake Maggiore Environmental Assessment program in St. Petersburg, Florida as a project coordinator of field activities. His responsibilities included the coordination and implementation of the monthly water quality sampling,storm event sampling,and vegetation transition zone determinations. Biannual phyto-plankton,zooplankton,and macroinvertebrate collections were also conducted by Mr.Gorsira. 8 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 10 of 14 CH2M HILL 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 505 Naples,FL 34108 CH2M H I LL Telephone: 239-596-1715 Fax:239-596-2579 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CLAM BAY STORMWATER QUALITY MONITORING CONTRACT NO. 09-5262 (CI-PU H2O) July 23, 2013 DESCRIPTION The general objective for this task is to contract outside Consultant Engineering Services (referred to hereafter as CONSULTANT) for the Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division (referred to as COUNTY),to conduct a surface water quality monitoring program consisting of the following: • Quarterly collection and analysis of surface water samples at 45 locations; • Preparation of quarterly summary reports; • Presentation of quarterly results to the Pelican Bay Advisory Board PART 1.—SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1: Sampling and Analysis On a quarterly basis for one year, CONSULTANT will collect surface water grab samples at 45 stations listed in Table 1, as well as up to 7 additional samples per sampling event for quality assurance/quality control. Consultant will analyze the samples for the nutrient and trace metal parameters listed in Table 2 using a laboratory appropriately certified in Florida through NELAP. The procedures for sample collection, handling, and analysis will follow applicable Standard Operating Procedures published by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Field procedures will include documenting the date and time of sample collection and results of field measurements of water temperature, pH, specific conductance, and dissolved oxygen within 1.0 foot from the water surface. September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 11 of 14 TABLE 1 Sampling Locations Clam Bay Stormwater Water Quality Monitoring Program Sample Station Station Name Sample Station Station Name No. ID No. ID 1 1-1 Waterside S 24 4-3 Bay 3 2 1-2 Waterside N 25 4-4 Bay 4 3 1-3 MJD 26 4-5 Bay 6 4 1-4 Crayton 27 4-6 Crescent 5 1-5 Registry S 28 4-7 Pelican 6 6 1-6 Heron 29 4-8 Coco Bay 7 2-1 Ridgewood Pk 30 4-9 Pebble Creek 8 2-2 George N 31 4-10 Pelican 3 9 2-3 George W 32 4-11 Calais 10 2-4 Club 4 33 5-1 Hammock Oak 11 2-5 Club 7 34 5-2 L Ambience 12 2-6 Lugano 35 5-3 Avalon 13 3-1 Laurel Oaks 36 5-4 County Park 14 3-2 Las Brisas 37 5-5 Breakwater S 15 3-3 St Andrews 38 5-6 Bay Colony EM 16 3-4 Pelican 9 39 5-7 Bay Colony EN 17 3-5 Interlochen 40 5-8 Bay Colony WN 18 3-6 Valencia 41 5-9 Bay Colony WM 19 3-7 Crown Colony 42 5-10 Vizcaya 20 3-8 Pelican 1 43 6-1 Trieste 21 3-9 Club 9 44 6-2 Remington 22 4-1 Oakmont 45 RC Main. Site 23 4-2 Bay 2 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session • 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 12 of 14 TABLE 2 Laboratory Analyses and Methods Clam Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program Parameter Method MDL Ammonia Nitrogen EPA 350.1 Nitrate Nitrogen EPA 353.2 Nitrite Nitrogen EPA 353.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen EPA 351.2 Ortho Phosphorus SM 4500-P E Total Phosphorus EPA 365.4 Cadmium EPA 200.8 0.05 pg/L Copper EPA 200.8 0.93 pg/L Lead EPA 200.8 0.05 pg/L Zinc EPA 200.8 2.5 pg/L Arsenic EPA 200.8 0.5 pg/L Assumptions: • The quarterly sampling events will be conducted in October, 2013 and January, April, and July, 2014. • The COUNTY will show CONSULTANT the sampling locations during the first sampling event. TASK 2: Reports The CONSULTANT will prepare a brief technical memorandum (TM)to summarize the results for each sampling event and evaluate compliance with applicable water quality criteria. The TMs will include the laboratory reports, field notes, and chain of custody forms. TASK 3: Presentations The CONSULTANT will present a description of the findings from each quarterly sampling event to the Pelican Bay Advisory Board after each TM has been prepared. PART 2.—PROJECT SCHEDULE: The schedule for sampling events and deliverables shall be as follows: • September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal and qualifications for water quality consultant services(CH2M Hill) Page 13 of 14 TABLE 3 Project Schedule Clam Bay Stormwater Water Quality Monitoring Task Target Completion Date Notes Quarter 1 Sampling 10/18/2013 Assume NTP by 9/3/2013 Quarter 1 TM 12/6/2013 Assume 3-week lab TAT Quarter 1 Presentation 1/x/2014 Quarter 2 Sampling 1/x/2014 Quarter 2 TM 3/x/2014 Assume 3-week lab TAT Quarter 2 Presentation 4/x/2014 Quarter 3 Sampling 4/x/2014 Quarter 3 TM 6/x/2014 Assume 3-week lab TAT Quarter 3 Presentation 7/x/2014 Quarter 4 Sampling 7/x/2014 Quarter 4 TM 9/x/2014 Assume 3-week lab TAT Quarter 4 Presentation 10/x/2014 PART 3.—EXCLUSIONS: The following tasks are not included in the Scope of Work for this Agreement: 1. Survey Services 2. Preparing permit applications or paying permit fees 3. Meetings with agencies or stakeholders other than the presentations in Task 3 Additional tasks, including but not limited to those listed above, may be added to this Work Order by Amendment if desired by the COUNTY. PART 4.—CONSULTANT COMPENSATION: The COUNTY will compensate the CONSULTANT for the above Tasks 1, 2, and 3 on a Time and Materials basis per the Fee Schedule agreed upon under Contract 09-5262—County Wide Engineering Services (CI-PU H2O)—Schedule B. An estimated budget to be utilized for the above tasks has been established and is shown as Attachment A— Manhour and Cost Summary. A man-hour estimate for the above Scope of Services has been prepared for the sole purpose of establishing the maximum upset limit for this Task Work Order not to exceed$69,714.00 y m m O O x 3 w X N F .- m. yN w W .+ N 'y z '1. G : b z m m n r d ro 7 R OR N ('� r 1 to r '+7 m ,p n A y r y K n; w o m o d y O A w ° . N O C7 y O '-G O. IF- o 7 o N o 70 w N Ec �7 n "C t7 ❑,r. y y� o C) Z w 2 o A mr 9 a r y x C r .. y ; rA y b w o n t .. z, m z F a m cA I. 0. 69 6.9 VO G (A A by A -.1 In ., in O i. O a O O O O O O O O O o O O O o O N Z N x c, . N C Q z z Y 0 0 u d o 0 m °o °o °o °o °o o o c . to z y zx, n ds yz x 0 ›. 0 0 0 01 ts1 o 4 • z y � .7 7 _ b 4 `° x A _ o z w x co — A o N• 0 N Joao i" GO v z o°▪ T o °o °o ° C rA 77 n o �o m oi v , o 4 o a N▪ O N ti CO ` ? cn r O Q ▪ ` [i7 7 O iN CA n O a g a a U °4, 4 4 a6 N 7, 0 0 oo o 0 y y Z "'C y 0▪ 0 0 0 0 7 d 71 tci . r S' c0 co w N N [n 3 2 • r, y n 'C 0 w C49 S' o n N y 2 2 N C9 a 3 y 0 5 0 0 0 o v r 6. O O O O O 2 A 0,0 0 o y o a 2 O 7 O O o y . '2' 3 2 U d cn O N ▪ z LPN LP o a 0 0 0 oo p y o o. oz a Co :� o 0 o z c — . - (JI N O O N o `� In O N r O ti7 N ry D n N O O N O, y O p O O O w o0 0 ° O r a o o O 0 3 7 0 y C , ii 0 r a 0 June 5,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Proposal for water quality consultant services(Coastal Engineering Consultants) Page 1 of 1 . LukaszKyte From: Mark Kincaid jmkincaidad' cecifl.com] Sent: Monday,August 05, 2013 5:03 PM To: LukaszKyle Subject: Re: Pelican Bay Quarterly WQ Sampling Attachments: TEST POINT LOCATIONS (11x17)) (2).pdf; Quarterly Sampling (1).xlsx Hi Kyle, I have prepared the estimate you requested. The breakdown for is as follows: Quarterly sampling for one year period 45 locations as indicated by attached Test Point Locations exhibit Analyzing each sample for 11 parameters as listed in attached Quarterly Sampling spreadsheet Sample collection and transport to lab=$9,850 Lab Analysis= $33,060 Quarterly Summary Reports=$6,500 Presentation to Board=$1,980 (This budget assumes 3 hours of a senior consultants time per meeting. If the meetings are expected to exceed this time or if PowerPoint presentations or other exhibits are desired, the budget will need to be adjusted.) Please let me know if you have any questions or we can be of further assistance. Thanks, Mark On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:29 PM, LukaszKyle < vleLukasz!i fcolliergpv.net>wrote: Mark, Good talking to you again, that goes back quite awhile. Per our phone conversation I have attached a list of the parameters that we are testing for on a quarterly basis. The locations of the sample points are identified on the attached map . I would like to receive a proposal for both collection, lab analysis by your private lab(or alternatively coordinating the lab analysis through the County Lab) and compiling the data in a quarterly summary report, If you could also include cost for presenting the quarterly report to our MSTBU Pelican Bay Advisory Board to answer question regarding results trends etc. If you have any questions please let me know, my office number 5597-2265 or cell at 438-5239. 111 COASTAL KRIS W. THOEMKE, PH.D., CEP ENGINEERING SENIOR ASSOCIATE SCIENTIST CONSULTANTS (239)643-2324,Ext. 156 • kthoemke@cecifl.com INC. Qualifications Summary Dr. Thoemke has over 33 years of experience as a professional ecologist in South Civil Engineering Florida. He has been a researcher and land manager for the State of Florida, private Planning Services ecological consultant, free-lance environmental and outdoor communicator, Everglades Survey&Mapping Project Manager for a non-profit organization and was a professor teaching Coastal Engineering environmental management,ecology,water management, and permitting and compliance Environmental Services at the graduate level. He has decades of field experience throughout all the upland and wetland habitats in south and central Florida and estuarine and marine habitats along the Gulf of Mexico. He has worked on a variety of projects involving environmental Headquarters: protection and habitat restoration as well as growth and development issues in South 3106 South Horseshoe Drive Florida. Currently,he serves as the Senior Scientist for CEC. Naples,FL 34104 Dr. Thoemke has worked extensively on Everglades Restoration issues and has been Phone. (2 9)643"2324 involved with the environmental aspects of land development planning, design and Fax: (`'3>)613-1143 permitting in southwest Florida since 1990. His broad range of experience with the ecosystems of south Florida and past public involvement uniquely qualifies him to Branch Office: conduct all types of ecological surveys, serve as a Project Manager, prepare state and 5745 Essen lane federal environmental permits and prepare Environmental Impact Statements. Suite 200 ton Rouge. LA 33935 Project Experience Prepare,process and coordinate successful issuance of ERP applications for coastal and upland projects Please visit our nehsitc: Prepare,process and coordinate successful issuance of CCCL permit applications vwvw.coastalengineerinq.com Conduct listed species surveys Conduct seagrass surveys Conduct wetland delineations Prepare Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System Maps Conduct submerged aquatic and biological resource surveys, Research and prepare environmental due diligence reports Perform vegetation analyses of coastal and upland habitats Design and permit of wetland,coastal and upland mitigation activities, Provide stormwvater water quality design and permitting services Investigate and resolve enforcement issues related to violations of state,federal and county permits Assess project compliance with state and federal ERP permits Contract Administration and Project Management Services Education/Certifications BS,Zoology,University of Maryland, 1973 PhD,Biology,University of South Florida, 1979 Certified Environmental Professional 005005350),2005 Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent-Florida(License#GTA-09-00294) Professional Affiliations Academy of Board Certified Environmental Professionals National Association of Environmental Professionals Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Society of Wetland Scientists Outdoor Writers Association of America COASTAL MARK A. KINCAID, P.E. ENGINEERING SENIOR ENGINEER CONSULTANTS (239)643-2324,Ext. 128 • micincaid a cecifl.com INC, Qualifications Summary Civil Engineering Mr. Kincaid presently holds the position of Senior Engineer for the Coastal Division Planning Services of Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc and has over has over 28 years of Survey&Mapping engineering experience. His design engineering duties consist of preparing Coastal Engineering construction plans and technical specifications; cost estimating design and repair Environmental Services design of coastal structures, planning sediment fill, borrow area, and channel maintenance dredging: wetland, marsh and beach profile and inlet cross section comparative analyses; and coordinating permit agency requirements. His field 1 Teiadqu irters: engineering responsibilities include marine surveying, sediment sampling. 310( South Horseshoe Drive biological surveys and species identification, deployment of hydrographic Naples_FL 34104 instrumentation, coastal structure inspections including above and below water, and Phone: (239)643-2324 construction observations including hydraulic fill placement. The marine survey 1 ,X (23) 643-1143 projects consist of bays, intracoastal waterways, inlets, shoals, navigation channels, beach profiling, hardbottom mapping. His environmental permitting projects include dredge and fill, coastal construction control, sea turtle and manatee Branch O1Tiee;. protection, mitigation planning, and beach restoration and maintenance. Mr. 5745 1; sen Haile Kincaid's project management responsibilities are client coordination, marketing, ;u1te`tt`t p proposal writing,and technical staff su ervision. 1taton Rouge,;e, LA 70 I() Prior Experience Phone t 2251 768-1982 Mr. Kincaid was previously employed as a Project Manager/Ocean Engineer for Fax l225;769-3596 Suboceanic Consultants, incorporated in Naples, Florida for eleven years. He was the firm's lead engineer responsible for all aspects of design, inspection, analysis and repair recommendations for marine and port facilities, subaqueous utilities Please visit ow website: and other related structures. He was the field engineer in charge of all www.coastatenntneerino.com construction monitoring of the firm's projects. Mr. Kincaid's duties also included the preparation of plans and specifications, permitting, job scheduling and cost estimations. His Coastal engineering experience includes inlet management studies, beach renourishment projects, dredging projects, jetty and breakwater design and construction. Other responsibilities included were client relations, marketing, and preparing proposals. Mr. Kincaid has also held the position of Systems Engineer for the General Dynamics/Electric Boat Division in Groton, Connecticut. He held a position in the Nuclear Department/Propulsion Systems Group. His responsibilities included hydraulic systems design and construction support for the Ohio Class submarine. Mr. Kincaid was involved in writing technical reports, system performance analysis, on-site construction inspection, trouble-shooting, and test-support. He served as a construction liaison between the shipyard. vendors, and the U.S. Navy. Education BS Ocean Engineering, Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida. April 1985 A.S. Oceanographic Technology, Florida Institute of Technology Jensen Beach, Florida, June 1982—Graduated with Distinctions Licensed Professional Engineer,State of Florida No. 58654, 2002 Professional Affiliations Florida Engineering Society US Coast Guard Master-100 tons Association of Diving Contractors PADI Master Diver Association of Coastal Engineers 4 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 1 of 8 PELICAN BAY SEDIMENT COPPER SAMPLING ASSESSMENT REPORT AUGUST 2013 PREPARED BY: TURRELL,HALL&ASSOCIATES,INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE,STE B NAPLES,FL 34104 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 2 of 8 Pelican Bay Sediment Copper Sampling Assessment Report August 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION In a typical urban environment, a variety of impervious surfaces cover the majority of the area and to regulate rainfall runoff, stormwater management systems are utilized. Stormwater management is the science of managing stormwater runoff to prevent adverse impacts on the environment. The goals of a well-constructed stormwater system are to control water quantity and distribution in addition to protecting water quality. The concept in its simplest form is to: convey stormwater runoff to a containment area where nonpoint source pollutants can settle out. Clean water can then be slowly released into the nearest waterway. Pelican Bay's stormwater management system's basic functions include reducing and dispersing the volume of stormwater to minimize flooding and erosion, attenuate peak flow rates to convey water to the mangrove wetlands in a more natural manor, and to filter stormwater to remove pollutants before the runoff enters groundwater, wetlands, Clam Bay, and ultimately the Gulf. Stormwater lakes are not regulated nor held to any water quality standards by DEP, however the natural systems that they eventually discharge into are. Recently water quality testing results identified elevated copper levels within Clam Bay. In an effort to ascertain the cause of the copper readings the community began to voluntarily conduct water quality testing within its vast stormwater system. Results of the investigation, documented in "Pelican Bay Nutrient Management Plan" (THA, 2013) did in fact show that copper concentrations within the retention ponds were significantly elevated compared to DEP standards for natural freshwater bodies. These findings and the recent broadening view of data collection and evaluation (discussed in the following paragraph) lead to the commission of this study to investigate the copper concentrations of the sediment within the stormwater lakes. Traditionally, management of aquatic resources in Florida has focused primarily on water quality. However, sediments are beginning to be viewed as important because many substances that are found within the water column can accumulate to elevated levels in sediments. As such, sediments can serve as both a reservoir and as a potential source of contaminants to the water column once those reservoirs have reached or are approaching their capacity. Several mechanisms contribute to metal remobilization from contaminated sediment. First, sediment and associated contaminants may be resuspended by agitation from storms, floods, runoff, and activities of bottom dwelling creatures. Second, changes in physicochemical conditions, such as pH or dissolved oxygen, can dissolve sediment bound trace metals and make them available to enter the water column Therefore, information related to sediment quality conditions is essential for evaluating the overall status of freshwater ecosystems. September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 3 of 8 Pelican Bay Sediment Copper Sampling Assessment Report August 2013 2.0 METHODOLOGY The Pelican Bay water management system is divided into six watersheds or drainage basins, as shown in Exhibit 1. Sampling for the study was conducted within basins 1 through 5 by testing 2 lakes in each basin, the locations are listed below and also shown on Exhibit 1. The lakes were selected based on the objective to obtain a representative sample early on in the stormwater system and another sample closer to the final basin outfall. Basin 1 (Sample 1-2) - Lake 2—Waterside Shops (2) (Sample 1-4) - Lake 6—Crayton Rd Basin 2 (Sample 2-1) - Lake 2—Pelican Bay Woods (2) (Sample 2-5) - Lake 7—Pelican Bay Blvd. Basin 3 (Sample 3-2) - Lake 1 —Oak Lake Sanctuary (Sample 3-3) - Lake 3 —Willow Brook Basin 4 (Sample 4-1) - Lake 1 —Oakmont (Sample 4-10) - Lake 11 —Golf Course Pelican 3 Basin 5 (Sample 5-3) - Lake 3 —Avalon (Sample 5-8) - Lake 12—Bay Colony Shores NW Lake investigations were undertaken and sediment samples were collected on July 8 and 9, 2013 by THA biologists. At each of the 10 lakes, data collection included; a sediment grab sample which was tested for copper and aluminum, a water quality sample that was tested for copper and hardness, a measurement of lake depth, silt depth, and documentation of shoreline vegetation. A canoe was used to navigate to the approximate center of the lake. The sample location was then located using handheld depth finder to identify the deepest location near the center of the lake. The water quality sample was taken from approximately 6 inches beneath the surface and collected into pre-labeled bottles from the lab. Hardness was then analyzed using a field titration kit. Sediment samples were collected following the water collection to safeguard against accidental contamination of the water column. First, the sample was collected by pushing a soil collection probe into the bottom of the lake. Upon transfer to the surface, the top inch of material was kept and transferred to the pre-labeled containers from the lab. Silt depth at the sample location was then assessed using a push pole marked with a measuring tape. Lab analyses of the sediment and water quality samples was conducted by Benchmark EnviroAnalytical Inc. • September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 4 of 8 Pelican Bay Sediment Copper Sampling Assessment Report August 2013 3.0 RESULTS Lake ID 1-2 1-4 2-1 2-5 3-2 3-3 4-1 4-10 5-3 5-8 Sample Waypoint 1.2 1.4 2.1 2.5 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.10 5.3 5.8 95% 99%sod Pine 95%sod to 50% 100% 100% 99%sod 100% 50%sod littoral to water. needles water. riprap sod sod to water. sod. 50% plantings Small area or sod Small area 50% Small area Planting natural Shoreline of littorals to water of littorals sod of littorals floating shoreline Composition around around around islands control control control structures structures structures Depth to Bottom ft 6.5 10 8.9 _ 5.4 11.5 11.5 13.1 7.9 13.4 10.8 Depth of Silt in 12-18 8-12 _ 2-4 _ 6-8 12-16 4-6 4-6 8-10 12-18 2-6 Hardness ppm 88 116 88 156 88 96 80 168 68 148 WQ Copper UG/L 24.9 48.0 68.0 36.1 20.4 44.2 _ 23.9 107 I 45.3 9.9 Sediment Copper mg/kg 717 14689 21.1 8230 9067 57.9 11.9 195 0.002 42.7 Sediment Aluminum mg/kg 8730 28182 263 28032 11938 606 378 746 1.50 719 4.0 DISCUSSION This study was conducted to investigate the copper concentrations of the sediment within the stormwater lakes of Pelican Bay. Various associated parameters were also evaluated, as described in Section 2.0, to provide a greater perspective of the condition of the system. Lake Characteristics Lake depth ranged from 5.4 to 13.4 ft., and could be interpreted as shallow to normal for stormwater ponds in Southwest Florida. Silt depths ranged from 2 to 18 inches in the different lakes so initially it does not appear that the lakes have filled in. Silt is defined as a sediment particle larger than clay but smaller than sand. It is typically generated by construction, agriculture, landscaping, and road debris and transported via stormwater, but is also a result of decomposition of plant materials within the lake itself. While silt depths do not appear to be excessive, it is apparent that larger sand particles have also collected within the lakes and made them shallower than originally constructed. This is a normal and expected process in stormwater lakes but care should be taken to make sure the holding capacity of the lakes is not degraded to the point that the intended water quality benefits are compromised. It does not appear as though any of the lakes tested as part of this report have experienced that level of sedimentation. The majority of the lakes exhibited shorelines that consisted almost completely of sod. The overall lack of littoral plantings may be a missed opportunity to increase the water quality September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 5 of 8 Pelican Bay Sediment Copper Sampling Assessment Report August 2013 benefits of the stormwater lakes, as littorals are known to slow down water and physically remove sediments and nutrients prior to the water reaching the lake. Water The DEP state standards for copper within regulated freshwater bodies (stormwater ponds are not regulated) are computed as a relationship with the hardness of the water. The acceptable limits for the specific metals vary based on the water hardness. In presenting this data, the water hardness levels in each particular lake have been used to calculate the limits for copper in relation to its specific hardness, expressed as Cu<e(0.8545[lnH]-1.702). Lake ID 1-2 1-4 2-1 2-5 3-2 3-3 4-1 4-10 5-3 5-8 Hardness ppm 88 116 88 156 88 96 80 168 68 148 State Standard for UG/L Class III waters 8.4 10.6 8.4 13.6 8.4 9.0 7.7 14.5 6.7 13.0 WQ Copper UG/L 24.9 48.0 68.0 36.1 20.4 44.2 23.9 107 45.3 9.9 120 100 — — k 80 --- a. 0 u A. 60 a 6. 40 —_— — 3 20 ... . f 0 1-2 1-4 2-1 2-5 3-2 3-3 4-1 4-10 5-3 5-8 Lake ID Id State Standard for Class Ill Freshwaters(Based on Hardness) LI WQ Copper The results are higher than allowed for natural regulated water bodies, which is to be expected given the purpose of the lakes and the extent to which they have been managed in the past. However, elevated copper concentrations may be an indication that there is too much present for the organic in the lake to bind and therefore more susceptible to passage through the water September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 6 of 8 Pelican Bay Sediment Copper Sampling Assessment Report August 2013 management system and into the waters of the estuary. The elevated levels are likely a result of extensive Copper Sulfate treatments but copper can also accumulate from brake pad wear, treated roofs, and pressure treated wood. Having some organic matter in the lakes is important as these organics bind with the copper and precipitate out of the water column into the sediments, thereby protecting the estuary waters from contaminated stormwater run-off. Sediments The tool for interpreting copper concentrations in sediments in based on a demonstrated and scientifically backed, naturally occurring relationship between copper and aluminum. Aluminum has become the preferred reference element to normalize sediment copper concentrations because it is the most abundant naturally occurring metal, it is highly refractory, and its concentration is generally not influenced by anthropogenic sources. This approach to the interpretation copper and other metals data was initially described and adopted in 1986 "Geochemical and Statistical Approach for Assessing Metals Pollution in Estuarine Sediments" (FDER/OCM 1986a & b). In 2002 "Development of an Interpretive Tool for Assessment of Metal Enrichment in Florida Freshwater Sediment" was published and further refined the tool to be used within freshwater environments. 1000 Sample 1-2 Sample 4-10 100 S m l � • �arip�e 8 Sample 2-1 .-a 0 Sample 4-1 rn �c E 1 -; : o 0.1 0.01 I 111 . 1i , , , 11111 , , , , 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Aluminum(mg/kg) September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 7 of 8 Pelican Bay Sediment Copper Sampling Assessment Report August 2013 This interpretive tool allows results of sediment chemical analyses to distinguish natural versus enriched copper concentrations in sediments as well as the degree of enrichment. Sediment samples are analyzed and metal concentrations are plotted against aluminum with regression lines and confidence limits clearly depicted. This information is capable of indicating copper concentrations at elevated levels and shows the distinction between natural and anthropogenic sources. The concentration is considered natural if the data point falls within the prediction limits. If a data point is plotted above the upper prediction limit, which all samples are, then the sample is considered to be enriched. Also, the greater the distance above the prediction limit to a point the greater degree of enrichment is identified. The lakes that were tested but which are not shown on the graph had test results for copper enrichment too high to fit within the set scale of the tool. This method alone however, only shows the degree of enrichment it is incapable of evaluating the potential hazards posed by sediment copper to aquatic organisms. Further tools are required to help determine if sediment copper is present at concentrations which could, potentially, impair the aquatic environment and associated biological processes. This approach has since been further refined and elaborated upon for the FDEP in numerous studies and documents using ever more stringent statistical standards. The documents include: "Approach to the Assessment of Sediment Quality in Florida Coastal Waters" (MacDonald, 1994 Volumes 1 & 2) and "Development and Evaluation of Numerical Sediment Quality Assessment Guidelines for Florida Inland Waters" (MacDonald & USGS 2003). These documents developed an additional interpretive tool to better assess the potential for biological effects associated with sediment concentrations in Coastal/Estuary waters called Sediment Quality Assessment Guidelines (SQAGs). These SQAGs define three distinct ranges of contaminant (copper) concentrations that are described as; a no effects or minimal effects range, a possible effects range, and a probable effects range. The threshold effects level (TEL)represents the upper limit of the range of sediment contaminant concentrations within which biological effects are rarely or never observed (no effects or minimal effects range < TEL). Within this range, concentrations are not considered to represent significant hazards to aquatic organisms. The probable effects level (PEL) defines the lower limit of the range of concentrations that are usually or always associated with adverse biological effects. And lastly, the range of concentrations that could, potentially, be associated with biological effects (the possible effects range) is delineated by the array between the TEL and the PEL. Within this range of concentrations, adverse biological effects are possible; however, it is difficult to predict the occurrence, nature, and/or severity of these effects. The numerical SQAGs for copper within estuary sediment are presented in MacDonald 1994, as a TEL of 18.7 mg/kg and a PEL of 108 mg/kg and they are offered with a moderate degree of confidence according to the author. In another MacDonald et al 2000 report "Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems" sediment copper thresholds were identified as TEL of 35.7 mg/kg and a PEL of 197 mg/kg though this information is not Florida specific. Numerical SQAGs for Florida's freshwater bodies have not September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7biii. Landscape&Water Management Committee Report-Status of Copper Data and Analysis Page 8 of 8 Pelican Bay Sediment Copper Sampling Assessment Report August 2013 yet been established so the above information is not entirely relevant to the Pelican Bay stormwater system but it is informative in showing the degree to which the Pelican Bay sediments are enriched above estuarine standards. Conclusions It is likely that the elevated sediment copper levels within Pelican Bay's stormwater ponds are human induced. This situation is not a compliance issue with DEP but the potential for downstream contamination increases as the stormwater pond contamination increases. Impaired flushing of Clam Bay's mangroves and bays coupled with increasing concentrations of copper from the stormwater system inputs could eventually lead to higher concentrations of copper in the estuarine system and associated adverse impacts to fish, invertebrates, plants, etc. While this data helps to gain insight into the general condition of Pelican Bay's stormwater management system, these results may not be indicative of the overall condition throughout all of the lakes. All 10 of the lakes tested positive for copper enrichment so it is assumed that the rest of the lakes within the stormwater system are enriched as well. However, fish and plant growth is still apparently viable within the lakes so catastrophic impacts have not yet resulted. This brief study of the Pelican Bay Stormwater sediments results and the interpretation of those results is derived from a solitary study using single non-replicated samples. No inferences of long term trend or future conditions can be made without further monitoring or study. It is yet to be seen how changes to algal management of the lakes that are being implemented within the Pelican Bay development will affect the overall concentrations of copper in both the water and sediments of the stormwater system. 0L61 06SZ £9£'0 W N d 0 L89'0 p O '-I L � e 8017'0 0 c Z co N • N (0 l0 O I D ce N � O 0 N O nl N E 0 O y 0 M U C CO 4) 0 N N m 7 N l0 C Q] � C� � U N CO a3 ~ Moe o ...... N � eiurcwr.wwwwaa..a p N n Q V + �Q N O ................ N E CO 01 m . rn N a N W a M v i. n ra 4 ■ v m ti In ro v � 1 CO N '-1 M 4 RS w N a • v O v Em • Q M N 0o j, m 2 m N 10 Ol LL V • M •-■ f1-1 M • m N m CO N v N M N N N N 10 ti CO -1 N M ti N t ~ O 00 O 00 O 00 N N .--1 .-i O O O O O O O O 1/2w eivawwy s M m V N 0 U a LO C7 ~ - C o m(7 f m Q:r ✓ 8- o d m c d o: E E 0 0 co o C E `^ CD rn ti • m c 2 ■ c a3 N a • 8v v n c`o E J ▪ N d n m a m • ■ v m t-i 2 • CO ■ o W Z..• E Q N co ■ m ti • • . d 1111 LL • N 0 Z • ■ • N ■ O O 0 0 , 0, 0 0, 0 O N N N e�i O p O O O O O p 1/8w eiuowwy 0, s M 0 V N C) O d L lO �p N m • N � Q ■ N l0 N ° a `m d oa< m y C N O N E ❑ O y § II ■ N m 2 c U d H .` y E O E tn o . d 0 = rn CD nra m i, ro 2 ■ N � N f0 ■ •N N CO O R a z Q N .-I ■ m fO N ■ N N ■ LL ■ r-1 7 O Z N 0 ■ -4 N 1(1 O O V01 O N N O O O O O O 61UOW WV 0, NOM N 8 MIEN L a m l9 m m D o Q1 Q -3"tii 00 w m V D o d m o m o� .H E 0 E 0 mU d E �m rn T lO C n c 2 a3 N O. - Env MOM . d rn d 75 a3 n a m ti - m ■ - m ■ •1 co ti D. Z •f� _ E ■ • • • M V _ OJ LL • • MOM � m - m m 1071 0 (0 0 (0 0 O 0 O O O O O O 1/2W EIUOWWv • C') O A) MOM 0) e V d N v m N L F50- N I l0 W o oA" — o 2 MN 4-' Ind - d m m 9?, 0, mommili x o v a E 1 NMI m m c m MIN o z N E — E — m 0 0 40 0 11111111111.111111 '2E rn m rn 0.c m c T00 m I t, m MIMI a 3 — M e6 1°y n — v jo E 0 . m CO a>� CO — ^v • OINIONI M .-i 2 C • •0 ® N-i m O IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII W Z M l0 6 • C V E 7 E a • Q 1 N ■ 0 2 M11111•1111111111111 `41 • N — rl d q 1111111111111111111.1 N LL 1 • 1 I N N I Z cr III MI I MEM I — v — IMIIIIIIII MEM NMI v MINIM EMMEN 1 1111•111■I 71 a MINN MIIIIIMMIIIIM OLi', 0° 0° O N N O O O O O O O O 1/2w e!uowwy 4 F 4 (o I O N OL6'I M 0 — U > 0657 m £9£'0 w — 7 L o. IMMO N 0 _ N Q N to I?' L89'0 o y N Q N>N w V a O " Om d MI m mm MI O m - E E — 0 o U' ; m E _ co rn O m c 80b'0 " m a OM Ji a3 =I 03 0 N a. MINIMMI d aai a m - (nna m NEI T 1 2 MEM S co 111111111111111111 . m ■L "13 OM S C N CO .ti O — ^ a Z IIMIMIM m ■ Lii — a N C — " •N Q CO • M .N•i LID T G E - E a d ai LL MEM • 0 — Z • MO ct U, NM EN NMI - m N EN IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III N lA NMI Ingellla IIIIII MI " V1 NIMINESINIIIIM IM NE U, 0 0 0 0 O N N N 0 0 O O O O O O 1/8w e!uowwy co Jcp N M a d 9 1 i ai 9 L OS a m 6S T75 o „ S H . 6S c E m o� H o 0 OLTZ `c9 U c1 g ? S N S m2 C U N 1 ., N a 3 OEOT E m NET • O 9 N a v�v — E.6 a v E 3 n 090ZT A d a . N 6 m d a m nr.-a m 6 9.4 S4 en 6 — 6 2 MOT , . 26 > 0 Z I a 1 L E6 E no GJ M a Q. 9 ■ 1 � U F T 1 yS to S, r4 -a 6A ii • Fs . 1 > 1 — �S o z • to Sc" 6,c' OL8E co, 08ZT , NOT .. lc' 9, Sr 6r _ Fr ll 8£'£T ® ,rra o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4pJ Py oo om 000 0 0 0 as 0 0 0 Go A d,, P9 PA 4PJ S 1/2n Jaddop °,i, 1 M s M W N a, d l0 m O u N m d CO N 41� d ' 'o a o d -m � c d o E • 2 E ti o _a U U C N _o c N t0O ■ N c CO 2C N 00 ° a v0a a" E co o E�m a:= m d H m CI)N.o_ m ti m m m _ N •� Z • CO a L ~ N N A f •-■ VO 00 Yf. Q o • U - N • N f6 • O1 LL • ti ti ■ O • ti 8£'£S • m (2,p O O O O O O O O O O O Ol 00 n lD N m N a-I 1/2niaddo3 M s 0) m U U) L N C7 - m 0 o g� � N l0 m N ' V a 0N O _' m m O y E `n E N o .U d U E d d rn ;-• w c m m U d M� ° a N �p V U V O E�rn N p N N n 0 m ti • fo m 1 2 N U �V1 0 CO m a II 4/�J OL8£ ^ N L. 0. O • U N ,-1 O8ZT f0 • MN • LL N � N N O • ti OTOT 0) 132_ C O 0) O1 ro 8£'£T , 3 fa c a W f i O O O O O O O O O O O O Ol 00 1� 8 4 1/2n Jaddop O0)) ) � m K MINIM a m 0 m O cam` co rn� ar o a Cr'N, = d c m NE ■ a E o NU . cati rn m ■ c U a • a N C C) O a N �p N a c o Ems° �o o a)a m CO r a m ti 2 ■ 2 m _ N .-1 (� v • CO o. W V l)a'1 N MINIMMIMMINIM NOMMOMMOMMONi r-1 f0 a) LL • m > 0 111.111111 • M fO N 1] an 8£'£i m a • = a O O O O O O O O O O O 01 CO 1/8naaddop 0 N M N ~ > N 8 ONNEMI (I; MENEEMiii a c0 <0 0 o 0£01 ° DZET co N N>l0 m e 9 Q O K m c y O1 O 4 E _ U U - ME U E a, m m 090ZT m c CO (13 1.110.1111111111111111= c U d co a3 (,) S 2 N �p � y V O E ▪ . rn i n�a v >. m • _C N N d3 m a ■ I- N W/� v N 0 O. 0 v � • N U- ' INE v ■ o z • m 4 0T0T IMONMENI N d' I ~ V 01 D 0) � H = c m -0 8E'ET ■ _ N c d o 0 ° o o °o O O O O o 0) 00 N. Co Vl V CO N 0 1/2n Jaddop 0, ZS I CJ i%5 11•1 63 1 -o MIN IV a) *, 1 2 11.i ot •11 7, .c o_ E 0 fa' N O th al =A" .2-T. 1 2 e5 2 ili 7n 1 ro . 1111 to= .-I ua co a, I o cc co 0 i pc r"'ll I .?. E 0 o 11110 8•E' — Q E co co MINI IA ro c =MIN co oi c 2 1•1 2 2 t 1'5 a_ MINEMBISIVIIII cc 0 11111111111111 iS a, I Cs1 0- cr, sr '4 ■ 15 MN .0 111111111111111111111.1 2 .• 0 MIMI 0.0 irn 0.6 0 rn MI I—I >. =NM ro • oo • PI, M L.) 11• m CC IN . MS 2 C MIMI la M 11111■1111111111M r- NJ ta0 MI ' Ul T-1 .. 0 IA 1111.1111111.11.1111.111. Z IMMO .11 . C o. .... E IA co r`.1 u.) ■-+ CD MIMI tio Cl2 I o uo i,.., I■1 u.,. s CU NM 0. MIIIIIIMIN IN e, 0. 11=1111 >. O ro 2 U ••••••••• • MEM c., ■ , lItillI=li=nalli ..rd. .L..•6 M= >o ■N z ••••••• •1 j, 11111•••• 11■11=111. MIMI I 1 MINIIIMI•MMIIMI in:;,' ' OM , ; L,L LA i L 111111•■• 1 111■111111111111101 : 11111111111111111 : . NI1111•1111111 -S, : 111■1111111■1 i MNIIIIIIIIII■ MIN .12 0 0 L., -0 0 al ,V, -0 c L-L 0 -F2 8£'Et El L" 2 ra ,.. c) . , . o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O cr, co r. l.0 V) Tr m N .-■ 1/2n Jaddo) s N M 0) a U) 8 d N a m C7 m m c co • N da m 3 d o a o ct m d m o c� a E E 0 0 m U d.. U C Z m 01 wE T c p c m N c N a3 M oC NN 0p V N V E o . m nn rn o a m n�a N m r-1 L > 2 ea ti 1 co 4J 2 E V O .y� N z li W C-) G ■ CC L V m N � ti O. 0. O • U N f0 2 ■ N d O! N LL • • c-I O Z N N m N 0 O O O O O O O ON 0 W CD V O O a-1 1/2n aaddoD J N 0) 01 N a H 6 d '-I N 6 ct N O L a '-1 o Q ..,.� 11+Xf;-,';k .. ,„ .,eir::^.,v...z. x'ir'1'ix lfl 41 in C co N ma N 1n N ul N N LO cc• O 9 p 1` N u1 m N U m E N . N Co m Vl as CD C�pp N 0 N n 0 C • v V d° ° 809 E In c?'m N v W a m L co N.d fa co a 13 c 090ZT r. fa v LA to v cu c Ln '2 J = c a 0 3 a, m m MI .n .; to 72 N G rc H N • OTOT ti 0 ,0 Cr a a C LT o fa m u a L w Q. on • Q O on m '-1 1 U LO M 1 on g ns % is, i M N >. £64 v CD i on 2 m I m N M .-1 on STS LID N Ln ■ (NI a N m 1 N N I N a• N- LD Lri .-1 lig V ti e-1 N e c1 '-1 N co Li-, O O� p O�00 O O V M m N N ati c-1 1/8n Jaddo) SE8'L v N OhT'8 — M OLT'9 -tea OZO'9 - N th . co m L = 2 d E E 0 ,. 01 (0 � = V1 c« 00 N V1 N = N (` N n @>0 O N . kip ce 0 O m 0- _ N 0 0 m 0 c o d _ V 0 0 OIVZ 00 m N 0 - N u) c, >,m u m c a3ti N 0- O V mo OWE v E E _ 1,_,, d p a a m m rI0- n - co d m ti n re , ■ 1 — v m `m a g • V N ■•1 CO > ▪ a, 0 y Z N Z. • a) v E d.+ - - n ti 0.0 CO = Q Z m N oo M 5 I , n • m E Cs) uo ti C v n • - m ti v .y - m > 0 z m • N m --I 11'1 N - V1 ▪ N OOL'S N - N - N N N N N (0 ry . In — ti a 1 m - N .-i N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CO t0 N N O CO (0 V N 0 N 1-1 .-I 1--1 .--I .--I O O O O d 1/Sw aleil[N Co E, 8 re a. 1111 t 27 II 0 C • O N � ma co,01 m J co cc r ✓ O 4 OR ma, C m O 9 E E N 0 U C in m ■- N co co c III 2 C a3 o C N 1p a. c yV V N C O Eco m m .m CC o C dam w,a m i e, s K d ■ N ■ c; • er � Q � y ■ N t0 r P. a il ■ D 0 ■ U U_C E ■of t0 C m�C U W ■ ca E n N v2 v E m d a CO - da m cnr,a m T CO 2 ■ ■ M N ti ■ N C 0 z • CO OOL'S a H ti L • Z • N 2 ■ .-I d • • ■ ■ ■ N N ■ ■ 1 ■ ■ ■ • ■ O O O O O O O O O O O 0 co t.0 °a ° °o ro �°o °v ° S N O O 1/2w a3e4!N { s I M 0) N 8 ce 0. CD m c co of N y l0 O> O0 H E n cO rn m c li m°v d 2`o EJco . m ;= rn inner - o m m 2 • aaaaaaa m N is 2 • M a •ea u, z E N oq L • Z N 1 2 • m • ti ti • erg - N 1111111/ 111 111, M • 11. 111 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 up V N 00 lD V N p O O O O 1/2w azBJ1!N M O P, W d N N v d t a T 0 m MEMEIMMNIMMI m 0 Sk 0 m i 0 Q N N>0] J m ET oc" -2 o a t0 N o m d f, d III E E E EIMMI o0 - U - 0) N co MMNMMMMIIMMMMI (0 m 0 C i 0 MIM a3 M,6 o a W C•4 °o - o HIm T Mil NOMMEM■I - a ■en m 5 • C 1 ti •in I 0 as — w co c • Ca - m Sm a Z •nJ NM I g . v N a 11 ■ N 0 IMMMIMIIMIIIMEMI Z a • v 1 - Z; NE EN — I MIN NM a MINZ I NM v NM NM °O 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 O 00 �n a N 0 00 l0 V N O N .1 .-1 .4 .1,1 .4 O O O O O 1/2W aleJl!N `" s SE8'L M 017S'8 I rn > OCi'9 CC 8 MN cc IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • OZO'9 L a IA f0 11111_ o N c l0 O r, N N e5 111111111111=11111111111111 m- MN d m 0 . ce c I N N N O c N 6 O_2 : E IMI = E 0 — m U I m.. y M a, N m O CO -_ U d — a� — M•a N 0tp- ✓ y C N 2 0 IIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIINMIMINNII E J N O1 N V1 a:_ Co — CO d 0. 1.11 CO N 1 5 ■ = 00 — N r. re 2 .a IN ■ C -1 CD ■ > O ■ Z lD . 1111111111 ^ a ■ LA C M al N •tri lallaillia m f0 a CO • ilai N — N Ca MIMI L CO }/ IA • Z — N 1 N 01 111■11111111111 o_ M • N INN <-1 MI O Z — • ■ — a O1SZ IIIM — m� v NM MN IMMI i N ■ alla NM NM MI O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 l0 a N 0 00 l0 V N 0 N .-I N .-I N N 0 O O O O 1/2w alw1IN I O 881'0 U M Z8 O N a lD m d K tip N d N u a, t0 N ' N o w-,1 C.T- 00 U r.. N 2 0 lU 0 3m: .w,. cc o n oK ..,...,.,>. In $ a N g m ' O 0 m 0 m U C In N 0 = N to of N G _ W LA N rr''-� M0 v o 0- - o v ✓ v V N E O E J N - V 0 N a- m rn°0_ - Co n fo .m-I al ` v 2 • { m > v z N 6 V • A, _ - ...m.. g N W ■-I L Q Z M N � M no 2 n • A N — to N A d 71 .......... LL Ln • . r'1 A p Z m • A - N fY1 ri N Ln N V • N m N N ' N - N N — l0 N V - M , ,It N r-I ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O1 00 n l0 L/1 v m N .-1 0 ■-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l/8w alul!N I 1 0) Fos al a, Lo o 6 2 O --- `m `m m d d o� m d o m o ▪ E a 0 O m _-- m c mm M 0 oa N tpp d yV 0 • E E J N 12 CO 0- m T-1 MINIM11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 a m N - • (Hi N •� Z m m E • • • ti • --- • • 3 '-I I w LL H N 1 Z N .11 --- --- --- --- -- ti --- O O O O O O O O O O O O O1 00 N- II V m N 0 0 q ti 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O C O O O O O O O 1/2w 3114 IN II M s N M 0C 9 N � N --- lY i0 -- O - t0 --- N f0 N ' �C a a ce) 111 o co d o E o w U Za' MIIIIIMMIIIIM111111111111111111111111■1111 ....■•■■••■ m c M� o a N ,, U V • O E d d in a R v m N 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 .� d Z Mea c • W N N H '-1 � Q • --- N N --- LL -- ■ Q Z • - rit- N --- millmorrommor --- --- O O O O O O O O O O Ol e0 I� l0 Vl m N ti O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V O O O O l/SW a3!J3!N CO EOM N 0) 9 a) U N Ol � m Q t0 lU N C O b u' i0 O> d0 ar D O a `m m D m a) c E 0 0 E wU v, N 0 p) --- T N CO 1111111111111111111111111111■11111111111111111111111111 C M e6 o � a �� N N• O E J N N N a:= O CO N- OMINIMMENMENEMMONSUMMIniniIIIMME O.) IN/M■111SIN■MMI t0 >ro 2 e 1111111111111111111111111111111■11■1111111111111111111111111111 m to • C 0 CO Emo■Nimi■EN■1111111 o, • ��- m 10 N as '^ I. moo 7 --- • Z --- N • a) LL O • 111111•11111•1111111111•111111•1•11 11■1111111111111111•11110111111•1111111111111111■1111111111111 MIN ch O O O O O O O O O O O O Ol 00 I� Li) V M N a-1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1/8iu al!J3!N r, 0 N M m I N ME d ....................... V IL1 O '2o 'o a `m d m°y C m .2, g o al m d rn m m Po m EMI c z 8 Vol a3 el.e EllE N O 00 ciCra N J N N I U) a I MINNINIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMM■11■■• N. d' CD I Lo a •v m N i Z E , r, m • LL • 0 o z i E m 1 4 I a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn co n U v m rN .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1/2w aUJUN cl To- 1 MOM N " ■ W 8810 I V N m z8Z0 ■ tt ; ■ L d NM N N o CZ o ' 1I D N I O d J> OI MIN �o a P. ma I o� E O E o yU d d to N 0 m c .-I L. U N N a3 e,co a N 2- INIES O w O _ N 0 3 1 E CO N I N m d o rn W a CO rn a CO ti T Co ■ 1 0 ■ v) m • CC I 13 N C MOM o as y z I n 6 ■ ■ � • `^ N LA m 'y� • Mfa N W `4 CO ' 'i • • N Z 1 IS Gl MINII • 1 a-1 1 c"I O z No 1 1 In I MN IIMI m 1 in I MEM NM N IJI .-I ■ in I 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O O1 0o h to Ui V m N .--I 0 .-t O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 1/8w a3I4IN Obb'Z 0188pxx'1 N fin cc en 08£1 06177 ' N o 4, e, 8£8'0 0911 .c SZ9'0 o m 0801 v, 986'0 668'O rn m v, 0 c 1 .. Co o N N Q n N N 5.?N (Y r U d a) . K) o r V7 m a) 0 0 o . m m 0 N U, U C E E 1 N ct o,, ( LA (p N C c 2 Lf, co N a in co Cr o�. 0 Cr as° I — a, E J N ( V '' d;=_ m 9Q a,a a3 m N. co I — v 2 _ up d m U ,L a • V N m 1 V o Z v I N a /� Li V N p "i 10 —... V Q L . • 1 O ! M N A m SO8'0 2 N. ■ LZ9'0 A N Lo M N LL • M '-1 V A o Z m • - m N ▪ M 0£9'0 I c-1 M " — to ^ N ............. U, N V N m N a N N N 1 (0 Ln - < ci — N " m c-1 1 N ■ ■ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n 0 U, 0 1n 0 1n 0 ,n 0 U, Q 7 m m N N .-1 e-1 0 o 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1/2w do43JO OD s N C ■O� J N 0 O ▪ a o� N c m o r. E 5 o .U U C d U1 N co OI T� ' U� , H V N V n O E J N d . N a:= m d - r d f0 ■ • 71 N ® t0 • r1 ■ ' CO • rsi E a o m t a p . M ! ti N • e4 • ti 1 O O O O o o O o O O O V1 O L/1 O V1 O V1 O Lf1 O V M M N N O O O O O O O O O O O 1/2W do42JO 0 N M a • d U a ■ 0 � N N . N �° 0 m N_ � O a p N O co N C N ' O Y N E Oo N U O C N (7 d m t0N C R1 m C� t0 • Mon N V N V E J N N rn�a m ® > • a m • N m ■ N ' •� z CO O ■ O ® N . m ■ ' N 1 ■ ti 0 ■ ▪ N O V O O u1 O O O p O O O N O O V m O l! O O O M O N O O O O l/8w dawO ,, .-, _ 0 M O N m N N m L N C N N 0 C 2- >7. d 6 w N N 1 7 00 c m m �v CO �. N my If O N E E 0 yU z E 505'0 II=........ co m >,m rn a 3 LZ9'O ....... N cO- Zia':= an ii ��•� aD m n' , m . 2 • C iler■Im■ r•-■ .— > IA sommommomommoso z° CU 2 0. alloommimil r"-) i rq L.1 t a t T 2 • ■Immosemil■ r., o Z • m m OE5'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u' 0 v' 0 u' 0 an 0 v 0 ul R [f m m N N .—j ti 0 0 0 d 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l/Sui do41PO s c M_ m ■111111111111111111•111111111111111111■1111111111• iii 4 -_� Et L a N 0 la I 0 O N 0 'y as 0 V u, la of 2 O ME U a C10"d' a' 5, C O H - N N m2 C N IIIE a� M m 0 o op N V 41'4 a o ,. EJr> m , d i 0 L CO V7 n a m ti ra 2 Trr ■ m :111 .— > tr) O Z ea a a o -- INC MEN11111•1•1111■■ a •IH O rsj ■ Z ■ c- i ME m •■•■•••••■ 4 ME N v N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )n 0 vi 0 Ln 0 ui o in o Ln a a m m N N -, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1/2w doLfO k CI o Obb'Z N • 018? a 1180 > 00E7 0 K N 08£i ce Ea 06177 a m (0 m m p N C l0 O d Q I N �3 m , ce c P. a III 0 N o r N E E 0 0 NU 'o' m 0911 0 d 8£8'0 m 579'0 O m 0801 ~ c 08Vi ti 896'0 a 3 6617'0 N a v1a CO P 75 M 0 N a:= 0 CD n�a T CO 2 00 N U cc ■ C 13 rs, > to „ 0 Z tD n f . �n 111 �n 0. c 3 Q .N 10 m • N O U) LL WE L.,,,, > O Z • a NM m i I UI N .--I LA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V) 0 u1 0 u1 0 to 0 Ill 0 U) V V m m N N - c-1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1/8W 0411O M °L££ U K M rn N D LD K N O c .ti a E LA (D 01 m N o co C.a LA O. N O n • N LA Ol▪? VD U Li) K'5, 9 Q N o L flObL'b N rn tf1 ,.,m co C . C LA ., N c-1 M of a o a O N VV U .. _ .. 4 E▪ `1 0, 4 n in a a CO m . >, n as a 2 r up a m ti rc a 2 TT a N . c.1 m > Cr o z . N n II . N N N m .-1 00 Z 066'Z Cr YL O1 •• r m N W m co n • m N lD i m U1 LL m ■ OLO'S `i) o 0 z m • m N m , N LO N 01 N V 0987 N m N N N a-1 N Co Ln N ■ V rV M .4 N ti O 0 O O 0 O N O 1n O Lo O N N e-1 ti O O 1/8w NIL M O M m 0 V 8 `E: a . A fo 0 N J a N N a, 2 O a 0 o m y o c ' = .N E E 0 0 m 0 C an N O r. a0 a_ CO a3 C Cp N a3 CO.5 E, N y d O Ern d . a_ rn niter m Co d m ao 2 • N N O C m z O. •t/f E ra an to Z a • H ti Co m 2 • (N a, N LL • • ci O Z N O O O O O O 0 0 O0 0 N N O O 1/2W NNl 0, 0 M Q> C) d N re d CD N m iu 01 U' N>l0 N ° � C v m o'' E 2 E 0 0 Irlimmomm ammommomm wU U C N E N N m IMMOMMENMEME W C co c C U d a� o a 63 2 15 N c�v ECM d m a CO r a M N (o ■ M 098'Z N 'i • N N N 'o • CO• rsi Z Y ■ N N m ■ N e4 LL ■ • MIN -I N O O O 0 0 0 n nj N r1 O O 1/2W NMI N M V 01 C) U N K b L m a m c=� o N 3 N N m O 'O N ° O O O,lc at' C1 O N = N y 5 E E o rn U 2 U E C d m cow rn m ro m c m c rn n � 1 aim no N o n r°v d°`o E17,rfDi = rn d o_: Oa m (4 n a m ti I CO ,t- 4, 2 ■ m iu ■ M 'o c d z I • ••" m 1 �0 N CO Ca Zm. a I— 11111111111 ■ N N m g ■ N V � m N LL ■ OLO'S c- I N IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■ m m � I N m N m o p O O 8 O O v1 O 0 N N '-I .4 O O 1/2w NMI N I M m N i d U � I d l0 0 0 O� O N � N (U N Co O. CT O CO C N E 0 HI ,,,„1 O E . a= rn i.0a ti I � v m ti I � I � • N O Z a (11, • • 00 CO • ■ N I t6 N • ■ a N I� N LL • Iar N N Z • 1 m I � N 066Z 0 0 0 0 °o0) 0 NJ N ti ti O O 1/N1u NMI 0, OLE'E CIVET rn cc L a La l0 � C 1 N � dO m � `m m U • a + o ce c m i 5 E o N U 0 2 E 0 N m e m 2 v� c m a� E) a N ttpp + ✓ y� `o E�CO d . N a, rn (n d a 1 fo • o ti U, 0, 2 • N 0 z n ■ L N N i H ti j • c CO LID L.11 • LY I r N a, • ti • Obi'b I � m vi N U, I ~ I + 0 0 0 0 0 Ls) O i11 0 111 0 N ti O O 1/Nw NNl M OLZ'£,,,,.OSS'1 b 866'O "` `" OZEZ Fis 09L'1 • 8Z9'0 0£8'Z N 4) D • 1£8'0 iii 0851 .. ~ e b06'0 0£0'1 o_ SLL'O 0 T 0£I'i '^ �? OS£'i 0£0'1 m m 0 c m o I u7 N LA N t0 (0 a) to CC g 12 O a s, d o m u, � � a 0 y b O m m U a; , LA '� N m ✓,, In y.N 03 c m N a-1 C 2 u1 U U) Ne...1 e...1 a, !i 03‘,5 0.- O 0 0 N O c-1 ✓ Nv SZ£9 ...... . .......... .. V 41 2 13 E M 4 d o:= rn U) v N >. 1, m Cr 2 to 00 m N Lo to 00 g I' V N ci m > v 0 ✓ Z C ■ N C a N N .-I - CO a a O. a, • m N '-1 C >. m LT9'0 n ■ m Ob9'0 N . a LL In • m a c 1799'0 i o z m • A N M VD N in . N • a N m N N N e-1 N N c1 009'0 a 'i m N H c-1 .-I o 00 a O N O 0 o d o o o o o l/8w dl N M m 0 0 d • a C7 m 0 I j N [0 l0 II O) T N lV C cam a3 m e6 F:, 21 �p O N V N O Ef,°v 0 N N = rn cnna m 009'0 • T f0 2 • n � o z E • co N TH CO W • a - N 'i e-L" LL I N • N N ■ .-I N 8 p Q O O O O O O O O O O O 'Ow dl O N 0 m U NI � N m 0 O co d N f0 N K a m m C m :y CO O ym U U C Z m N N m >,CO m C CO C -_ CO a3 co N 0�Q. a. -J , m n:_ m m n m rn �a N• • m • m N -_ • O N m z a C £ �p N CO • • N a, • N .-1 O Z • N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1/2w dl 0, .01111•0•11111•111111.* _ s N M O) V U) U N a C7 m 0 cL o 0 m � d O � `ii oo E 0 N U LT9'0 U � Z E m d m rn >,m c c n c m c� `m 3 049'0 N o v�°v c Env N a m ti ri smoommemomono c- N M �, z • rn m N • •111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 M� no W CL. N MINNINNINNINNINNEi -i f0 • imoomonommommo N � N m O1 LL • 499'0 • m m N p O O O O O O �p u7 M N c-I O O O O O O O O 1/2W dl M C's N d N N U V N m m � I cL' I EOM MIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■1111=111111111111111111111111111111.■1111111 .ti • ° v ('5 8Z£'9 m3 II 0, E O rn > m m c c y m a3 N a 00 v ✓�v a m`o E m . nf= rn d m cn n a >• I � • I � • N '-i O Z o Ts • tp rti 01) W 11111101.1111111111111 • m 11■1 ti • I o • MINN MIIIOMINMNMMIIMOIIIOIMNOOMOIIMN IMMEI MEM MMINNE m N ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mg 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 1/8w dl M r N OSS'i, ro OR'E ° 866'0 m OZ£'Z cc 0 09L'i K SZ9'0 -Jr; 0£8'Z L a m m O N c L` t0 0'� •N > ai 0 U) N N W W ce o ZES.O o a NTT ,..� '- N E o E 2 `m 0601 r n rn P06'0 m c 8LL'0 ' o m g OEL'i Lh d 'i OS£ i4 0£0'I aa� M q O d N v,gv rn NJ V N a= 0 d a m Anna m "IIIIIIIII i• a g • m 71 FM in o ■ g" U rq Ca M LA IIP N■ N N > co 6 m co 2 d esi 1 III MP ■II�� LL • Ln Z • IIIIIII a Ln m Li, ■6.01.0 i N V) , 11111 , 1:. L), O O O O O O s . a m N O O O O O O O O 1/2W d1 i I i September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 9a.New Business-Pedestrian Safety at Oakmont Parkway&Woodhaven Lane(Joe Chicurel) Page 1 of 5 From: Joseph Chicurel To: Resnir_kl ica Subject: Woodhaven Lane and Oakmont Pkwy.(Blind Curve) Date: Monday,June 03,2013 5:36:30 PM , . I a, # ��� E � -.t: $ ry '• f � ►' xi ** j ` ', ' 9 am ,�. ..1 ,. - .. '. bw . IMG_0257.JPG Existing Woodhaven Lane(turning right onto Oakmont Pkwy.)looking north for cars coming around Blind Curve S September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 9a.New Business-Pedestrian Safety at Oakmont Parkway&Woodhaven Lane(Joe Chicurel) Page 2 of 5 G c. . ' V * �,. frlrilhi . , �� fir;. •4 $ DN,$.,, e \�Y I ,,.?` �!• ..'•or 4 2 IMG_0258.JPG Oakmont Pkwy southbound approaching blind curve and Woodhaven Lane entering roadway from the right ITS,'fraaiagecN "r U L c) o 0 3 o ‘0 1 I I 1 I ho' c p y � o C O C CU CD 0101140 a lic ' .1.. CC °Z5 H 0 ..._, shit. A N C • O Y ,2,744.(10419 o T cn o t >,m RS m C C ca co c U N • N a aa) a co ' N O C N 0 C N m 0 E a) M `J` dz CD \ %\ N cp c6 a �1 cn o) a Is ITT ** Ili a 1A°'1°ffer7pp i t L ri al" r U U 0 O a� C ca C O C U U) > N co U) -O CO O O)� "Q O 3 O Y CO m C Q 0 . C • o co U O Z (/) T CO(n/) CC C C N'C U N CL • o_ s ;! N tq 7 In 0 CO 0 z Q O) cD C/)a)0 September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 9a. New 5 of Business 5 -Pedestrian Safety at Oakmont Parkway&Woodhaven La Page ne(Joe Chicurel) •co all te t visible screensee,a use he the d"Ptails rint'hat link next are to the on map the Got.).81.e � �% ; ' a„, 2 , 2 ir-, - Rtell !e SwVeer1ot vUs6kEi S#e�78�} At .S '' ,,,;',,,.„ 4.4•0 1'- , '',11.' iit„....407' . .''''-' 1.,.."-1 f ' .•••1 '' . o ' ' 116 ..,,., , i, . ...i., i: ' : lk ,' ' ' '.....\ ..,.- ‘..,;$:44 M • , i o.,4, . _, w- ' ' ' 14.11m ''''—'' %; '''i , ' * .,.. .. -. t ','. ,.-..'-' . 'P' 7 . v , , , ., , .. .... „. , ,, .,,.-1,-,,,,- ,.,,i r. Ahlir g ' ' ' 1 ‘11.-,111 S::t:-:ll i;,...ru:,,,,,,.c' a.-.,.::' .,,,,,,,i:„....,,,,,,,..,,,*,_ mot (ill,' g ,,,,, .,-- ,. p:, ' - :h F s ? t i d. .ieal Fury d 7'.”-- September 4,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 9b. New Business-Share the road with bicycles signage(Joe Chicurel) Page 1 of 1 From: INCIALCUSSILei To: ResnickLisa Subject: signs Date: Wednesday,June 19,2013 12:30:48 PM Lisa, This may be a better way to print them (side by side). reF CAUTION' 0 I efila t f� MAIN STREETS(i.e. PB Blvd.and Gulfpark) SIDE STREETS(i.e.Oakmont,Greentree, two lanes of traffic eachway) Ridgewood-one lane each way) ,„4�-: r3� ;:; � �ir�':'� Jt�; p �"� °zu� � •tom :� r,��' �s�'}si fir �r■i��waoi0■ � d�" ' � ",-,"'•-'`*�°€ ` 7�:�`� 3 R �R '�` „TII l�. t..- .$ d.. r�rrrrr�■ v m Q a Ft ' >` t Zvi 1-4- . N m m to'a �° t� I." �j 2 Zt .»»< ..1 `aM1,+.,-� I 'I � *T" � + Rib .y '+ "5 S: {s i d y If' ?5 U wa m V 4j F4 0 F :L ` • s o as+ 4'''t +" �,_ y , f a co '✓ •w,.b, .7' n 'r a F^. ¢° T,' .4 rR . . iv �p,:ti.:it ,` /f 4 .'"Il CD.1"' *-\ -0 1 ; .. ,..-, o ddd qr - { Eye. 4` §.r'A \ "' � { , FD' cr 6! r t a -. b, �* =ter J � ,I w I z i `. „,— ' mow .. ', _ , N) CD �E 7r€^ � f ' R 3 CO ea- a• � ` ; CO Sp cn 4. t CD CD i {� ' � ` n p F +-,a '} Y .fir ,, (fl { t. f� Gc _P CO '" • .. w M-- e: +", S .-•'tJ4!. ! r; !� R {.: ... '.tom ` ��?5a - �3'' + Q *T-r t L'I.i... 4.. -'...,...#.- ' . cn CD f . r O °' \ 'R' `•ywi�;F ^may#W s' �'M t` • R - i z 1 Mpi i L R gg (p 2 T� . ,USX J r ` ç- 0 . ark M �D ,� r5 t�. y a n cn N . t q �y L ' 0 M r fir,. �'` .t z CD X �1 f s CD CD T t( . r �p 'A",;,.: pgir s'''' (n a.� ; , �_ CD CU te tw W\4:a,� , 4'4 >w f r�a cn- If /Alit ...... .,, ' — ..,.- ... --,,“ :, ir .. i',-, 4 v i � w - . t t i- 1 WI r4. #.441, ot 14 r'4'''''.--.".---'''":*.e.'• �t C p yy �q �S va Y o- a4 y M „� cn ln,b g r tiR R 1T4f S JT 1. 3 V r"-� y�� m op- home s 7 ■ s p „!` r' r d Y Far, '� ;. w . n,µ,� a �.i E 1 t- r a i 4._ :`'i �rei,. 'r •-. bt f3 co - ''+p",` �`a..a b M', ■flat . «tr a ', 401116' O.�t R �{ C,� lilt ,, 3 4'tit.T }" ► ' �'f aktz r. °" A ' k3 ' w " e< „ E ,5 3( rrre . g}t _, o.- r r . • X ' B ` T p . . �... .' , „ r 1T vF x ° z .Y',k Ew- d ti'if