The URL can be used to link to this page

PBSD MSTBU Agenda 02/13/2013 161 2 A i+ iii? MaRITY3 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION FEB 2 p tai 3 D Municipal Service Taxing & Benefit Unit BY: ..,. . ...., NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 13,2013 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 13 AT 11:00 AM AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108. AGENDA The agenda includes,but is not limited: 1. Pledge of Allegiance Fiala 2. Roll call Hiller 3. Agenda approval Henning 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes Coyle a. January 2 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session •COleitd b. January 15 Landscape Water Management Subcommittee — — c. January 15 Clam Bay Subcommittee �Ar1Ce d. January 21 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Special Session e. January 22 Pathways Ad-Hoc Committee 5. Administrator's Report a. Speeding on Pelican Bay Boulevard,enforcement activity to date and planned enforcement activity presented by Corporal Carmine Marceno,Collier County Sheriff (John Chandler) b. Clam Pass permit update c. Crosswalk Standards (John Chandler) d. Monthly Financial Report 6. Chairman's Report a. Announcements 7. Committee Reports a. Budget Subcommittee (Michael Levy) b. Clam Bay Subcommittee i. Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass (Susan O'Brien) ii. Mangrove monitoring report (Tom Cravens) iii. Status of osprey nesting box (Tom Cravens) c. Landscape Water Management Subcommittee (Dave Trecker) i. Water collection basins post-construction agency monitoring and reporting requirements ii. Algae control recommendation iii. Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation iv. Transition of Coastal Zone Management Water Quality Monitoring program to PBSD d. Pathways/Tree Canopy Committee (Keith Dallas) i. January 22 meeting update Mi r �eS: ii. *Review of expanded proposal from Ian Orlikoff,ISA Certified A-rbo�is{O iii. Discussion of next steps e. Strategic Planning Committee update Date. 10. Old Business 11. New Business Item#: a. Establish priorities,and identify upcoming meetings b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Copies to: 12. Audience Comments 13. Miscellaneous Correspondence 14. Adjourn *Board vote is anticipated ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE(3)MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD.THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE(3)MINUTES.THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO,AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE,WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE.PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT(239) 597-1749 OR VISIT PELICANBAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET. 2/11/2013 11:03:32 AM 161 (4/, PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 2,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Regular Session on Wednesday,January 2,2013 at 1:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay,8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples,Florida.The following members were present: Pelican Bay Services Division Board John Iaizzo Tom Cravens,Chairman Michael Levy Dave Trecker,Vice Chairman Susan O'Brien John P.Chandler Mary Anne Womble Keith J.Dallas John Baron absent Geoffrey S.Gibson Hunter H.Hansen absent Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator(participated by phone) Mary McCaughtry,Operations Analyst Kyle Lukasz,Operations Manager Lisa Resnick,Recording Secretary Also Present Susan Boland,President,Pelican Bay Property Owners Association Kevin Carter,Field Manager,Dorrill Management Group Joe Foster,Humiston&Moore Tim Hall,Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. Jim Hoppensteadt,President&CEO,Pelican Bay Foundation Ken Humiston Brett Moore,President,Humiston&Moore 65 in audience FINAL AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Agenda approval 4. Elect new Chairman 5. Recent Board of County Commissioners'(BCC)decisions involving Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) presented by Commissioner Georgia Hiller 6. Audience Comments 7. Approval of December 5 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes 8. Committee reports a.Clam Bay Subcommittee i.Clam Bay transition plan ii.Clam Bay dredging permit 9. Monthly financial report(deferred to February 13) 10. Cobblestones at San Marino crossing*(John Chandler) 11. Setting Priorities(Keith J.Dallas) 12. Changes to Pelican Bay Services Division Ordinance 2002-27(Keith J.Dallas) 13. Old Business a.Scheduling meeting to discuss Board policy for reconsideration of . (John Chandler) 14. Miscellaneous Correspondence ',. 15. Adjournment 8582 i 161 2Aif . Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes January 2, 2013 ROLL CALL Nine members were present(Chandler,Cravens,Dallas,Gibson,Iaizzo,Levy,O'Brien,Trecker, Womble)and two members were absent(Baron,Hanson). AGENDA APPROVAL Vice Chairman Cravens made a motion, second by Dr. Trecker, to approve the agenda as amended: Following item 4, `Elect new Chairman', the Board would proceed with item 5, - : Recent decisions..."presentation by Commissioner Georgia Hiller;then item 13, "Audience Comments';then item 9, "Clam Bay dredging permit"presentation by Ken Humiston. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. ELECT NEW CHAIRMAN Effective immediately,Chairman Dallas resigned as Chairman of the PBSD Board. Dr. Trecker made a motion,second by Ms. O'Brien, to nominate Vice Chairman Cravens as Chairman of the PBSD Board. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. Chairman Cravens made a motion,second by Mr.Chandler to nominate Dr. Trecker as Vice Chairman of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board for the interim period from now until "we have a new Board and elect a new set of Chairman and Vice Chairman" The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. Dr. Trecker made a motion, second by Ms. O'Brien that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board acknowledges Mr. Keith J. Dallas for his outstanding stewardship as Board Chairman with a plaque at the next Board meeting. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. RECENT DECISIONS MADE BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS(BCC)INVOLVING PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION(PBSD)PRESENTATION BY COMMISSIONER GEORGIA HILLER Commissioner Georgia Hiller commented on recent decisions made by the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)involving Pelican Bay Services Division(PBSD). The BCC reaffirmed that the PBSD is responsible for managing all aspects of Clam Bay/Pass and January 8,the BCC plans to vote on several rem recommendations: 1)To transfer sufficient funds to PBSD already set aside for Clam Bay projects;2 re the closure of Clam Pass an emergency situation requiring dredging(strictly and solely to allow 4 .r e. .to flushing and to preserve the health of the mangroves,and science will determine the size of th° . t.q P )as quickly as possible once permit issues are resolved; 3)to direct staff to override the pur- asing p ° avoid the delay of the bidding process;obtain bids from two prospective dredging co, ._,1• en to an agreement with the lowest bidder;and 4)at the time that the Clam Bay Manageme ' ,'.,all stakeholders will have the opportunity to participate. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ms. Marcia Cravens was concerned about the U.S.Army Corps . CE) permit application and PBSD ordinance; Ms.Pat Bush and Dr.Ted Rai. • •+ ce- •a . .out the"Seagate lawsuit'; 8583 i . , 161 2Aj i(f Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes January 2, 2013 Ms. Annice Gregerson was concerned PBSD would lose responsibility for Clam Bay; and Mr. Scott Streckenbein and Ms. Diane Lustig were concerned about the inlet closing and impacts to the environment and public health. Mr.Hall explained the longer Clam Pass stays closed and water cannot disperse the greater chance of negative impact to the mangroves by submersion. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 5 BOARD REGULAR SESSION MINUTES Dr. Trecker made a motion,second by Mr.Chandler to approve the December 5 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session minutes as presented. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. CLAM BAY DREDGING PERMIT PRESENTATION BY MR.KEN HUMISTON&MR.BRETT MOORE Mr.Ken Humiston and Mr.Brett Moore,Humiston and Moore Engineers(HM)made a presentation about dredging Clam Pass. Based on current conditions,and to increase time between dredging events,HM recommended the optimal width of the cut at the mouth of the Pass(Cut A)is sixty feet. HM expect to have the construction plans and specifications complete by January 15 to present to the Clam Bay Subcommittee. The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers'(USACE)suspended the County's Coastal Zone Management(CZM)Clam Pass dredging permit application. Ms.Marcia Cravens and Dr.Ted Raia were concerned about HM's optimal width recommendation. Mr.Charles Bodo suggested HM consider using methods and structures used to stabilize inlets. Ms.Kathy Worley suggested HM apply for an interim or one-time only permit to open the pass. APPROVAL OF TURRELL-HALL WORK ORDER Mr.Tim Hall distributed Turrell-Hall's(TH)work order of the tasks needed to obtain permits quickly from several agencies to reopen Clam Pass. Mr.Hall would discuss with USACE officials soon the methods USACE recommends that PBSD take to obtain the Clam Pass dredging permit quickly. Mr.Dorrill and Ms. O'Brien plan to attend.Mr.Hall estimates that if PBSD applies for a USACE Nationwide permit the turnaround for USACE determination to issue the permit is minimum 30-45 days. A major task of the Turrell-Hall work order is to update the 1998 Clam Bay Management Plan w • would reference having"permits in place"to dredge when needed.Mr.Hall distributed a draft invitat'• participate to"stakeholders",including but not limited to neighborhood associations,conservati•1;Ilos environmental organizations,user groups,and government agencies. Ms.Kathy Worley requested Mr.Hall consider suggestions she submitted on developing. management plan. ; r A resident presented recent aerial photographs of Clam Pass. Mr.Chandler made a motion,second by Mr.Levy to approve the T t all 1 '' 4 rder as presented The Board voted unanimously in favor and the mot % 8584 i 161 2Ajq Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes January 2,2013 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT Report deferred until February 13. COBBLESTONES AT SAN MARINO CROSSING*(JOHN CHANDLER) Due to continued complaints from residents of San Marino that the noise made by vehicles driving S over cobblestones were a nuisance,the Board considered removing cobblestones at the San Marino crossing. Mr.Ted Darrow,Mr.Steve Seidel,Mr.Pat Downing(San Marino);and Dr.Ted Raia expressed concerns about noise,safety,speeding,and were in support of removing cobblestones at San Marino crossing. Mr.Jim Hoppensteadt made an indication that as the PBSD Board is responsible for noise abatement in Pelican Bay,the decision made today would set precedent Mr. Chandler made a motion, second by Mr. laizzo, that the PBSD remove the cobblestones at the San Marino crossing and replace with fire-red clay brick pavers. The Board took a roll call vote: 5 voted in favor of the motion (Chandler, Cravens, Gibson,laizzo, Trecker)and 4 opposed(Dallas,Levy, O'Brien, Womble)and the motion passed. PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION ORDINANCE(KEITH J.DALLAS) The Board discussed suggested changes to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the Pelican Bay Services Division Ordinance 2002-27. Ms.Cravens was concerned about alleged erroneous language in the proposed ordinance. Mr. Dallas made a motion, second by Vice Chairman Trecker to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners to amend the proposed PBSD Ordinance:1)regarding limiting Chairman and Vice Chairman to one-year terms,strike, "... unless all members have previously served..." to read, ':..unless all members have been given the opportunity to serve..."; and 2) consider staggering this year's appointments, so that the two applicants receiving the most votes are appointed for four years, and applicants placing third and fourth are appointed for three years. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. Ms.O'Brien made a motion,second by Mr.Dallas to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners to amend the proposed PBSD Ordinance [to manage the current "interim" Chairman situation until a new Board is appointed] to allow the current Chairman to serve a fifteen-month term; then revert to the twelve-month term. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN OF LANDSCAPE WATER MANAGEMENT SUBCOM s Chairman Cravens appointed Vice Chairman Trecker as Chairman of the Lands : :• Water' Management Subcommittee. 1. APPROVAL TO OBTAIN PERMITTING TO CONSTRUCT AN OSPREY NESTING PLAT e , 1 Chairman Cravens made a motion,second by Mr.Chandler to 41: ukas proceed with contacting Mr. Tim Hall to get permitting for .1i•„ + =p d , Osprey nesting platform near the South Beach facility. The Board vo , $ I +in favor and the motion passed. __ \ 4140 8585 161 2A Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes January 2, 2013 ADJOURN Ms.O'Brien made a motion,second by Mr.Chandler to adjourn. The Board voted unanimously in favor,the motion passed,and meeting adjourned at 4:05 p.m. r Tom Cravens,Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick \ 2/4/2013 8:43:05 AM 8586 ,Y , i 161 2A ( q f V LANDSCAPE WATER MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MEETING MINUTES - TUESDAY,JANUARY 15,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Landscape Water Management Subcommittee of the Pelican Bay r Services Division Board met Tuesday,January 15 at 1:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples,Florida.The following members were present Landscape Water Management(LWM)Subcommittee Dave Trecker,Chairman Keith J.Dallas John P.Chandler Geoffrey S.Gibson Tom Cravens Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Mary McCaughtry,Operations Analyst W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator Lisa Resnick,Recording Secretary Kyle Lukasz,Operations Manager 5 in the audience AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of December 10 LWM Subcommittee meeting minutes 3. Update on copper monitoring and status of trial programs on algae control 4. Pelican Bay community outreach regarding the importance of BMP a. Landscaping color at"end-caps"discussion(Chandler add-on) 5. Audience Comments 6. Adjournment ROLL CALL All Subcommittee members were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Cravens made a motion,second by Mr. Dallas to approve the agenda as amended, adding Mr. Chandler's item 4a, Landscaping color at"end-caps"discussion. The Subcommittee voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 10 LWM SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Mr. Cravens made a motion, second by Mr. Dallas to approve the December l M Subcommittee meeting minutes as presented. The Subcommittee voted unanimo favor and the motion passed. UPDATE ON COPPER MONITORING AND STATUS OF TRIAL PROGRAMS ON ALGAE S NTROL Mr.Lukasz reported that this month,staff plans to implement the copper m.' e _v f..2.: ria program using alternatives to copper sulfate to control algae at sites located within Ba Mr. Cravens made a motion, second by Mr. Dallas to make men f ,n to the PBSD Board to direct the Administrator to investigate subcontr• elf . . • ic• oval of algae in lake systems. The Subcommittee voted unanimously in° a\ - P 1,• passed. 16 i 161 2A iiii Landscape Water Management Subcommittee Meeting Minutes January 15, 2013 Chairman Trecker was concerned about rumors he heard that PBSD was not incompliance with the SFWMD Master Surface Water Management permit Mr.Dorrill acknowledged that he planned to meet with SFWMD officials January 23 to resolve permit modifications conveyance-related issues,but was not aware of any non-compliance issues regarding the Master permit. r PELICAN BAY COMMUNITY OUTREACH REGARDING THE IMPORTANCE OF BMP Mr. Cravens made a motion, second by Chairman Trecker to make a recommendation to the PBSD Board to proceed with production and distribution of"Landscape BMP Draft 1.0" The Subcommittee voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. LANDSCAPING COLOR AT"END-CAPS"(CHANDLER ADD-ON) Mr.Chandler was concerned about resident complaints regarding the lack of color in landscaping at median"end-caps". Mr.Dallas said planting maintenance-intensive Annuals would defeat the purpose of attempting to employ BMP. Staff would contact Landscape Architect,Ms.Ellin Goetz to make a presentation at the next LWM meeting of her recommendations for colorful and drought-resistant alternatives to Annuals. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ms.Diane Lustig explained`BMP Draft 1.0"was informative but lackluster. Mr.Dave Cook suggested PBSD hold a workshop that focuses on littoral plantings. Mr.John Domenie was concerned that employee training did not change behavior. ADJOURN Mr. Cravens made a motion,second by Chairman Trecker to adjourn. The Subcommittee voted I unanimously in favor, the motion passed,and meeting adjourned at 2:12 p.m. Dave Trecker,Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 1/29/2013 3:37:34 PM -,,Ay„1„. ,,,,-, 17 16I 2A lit- CLAM BAY SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY,JANUARY 15,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Clam Bay Subcommittee of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on Tuesday,January 15 at 3:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay,8960 Hammock Oak Drive, r Naples,Florida.The following members were present: Clam Bay Subcommittee Susan O'Brien,Chairman Mike Levy Tom Cravens Mary Anne Womble Pelican Bay Services Division Board Also Present John Chandler Keith J.Dallas Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator Mary McCaughtry,Operations Analyst Kyle Lukasz,Operations Manager Lisa Resnick,Recording Secretary Also Present Tim Hall,Senior Ecologist&Principal,Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. Jim Hoppensteadt,President and CEO,Pelican Bay Foundation Kathy Worley,Director of Environmental Science,Conservancy of Southwest Florida 30 in the audience AGENDA 1. Roll call 2. Approval of December 27 Clam Bay Subcommittee meeting minutes 3. Clam Bay transition update 4. Clam Bay dredging permit update 5. Meetings needed by Clam Bay Subcommittee and/or PBSD Board to continue to expedite the Clam Pass dredging permit 6. Audience Comments 7. Adjourn ROLL CALL All Subcommittee members were present. AGENDA APPROVAL Mr. Cravens made a motion, second by Mr. Levy to approve the agenda as presente I Subcommittee voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. q APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 27 CLAM BAY SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Mr. Cravens made a motion, second by Mr. Levy to approve the De w;§• •r 27 +a spy Subcommittee meeting minutes as presented The Subcommittee vote,:--!--.. L` 4 Tvor : and the motion passed. CLAM BAY DREDGING PERMIT UPDATE Chairman O'Brien reported at this time the Pelican Bay Servi „ c ' e .,+uld only pursue a Nationwide 27(NWS 27)permit from the Army Corps of Engineer US . - eo•- Clam Pass as soon as 17 161 2A 1� Clam Bay Subcommittee Meeting Minutes January 15, 2013 possible.Once Clam Pass is open,then PBSD will seek the ten-year permit and update the Clam Bay Management Plan. Mr. Dorrill reported as the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) declared Clam Pass closing an emergency requiring dredging as soon as possible,Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD),is pursuing permits on an emergency basis. The Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) stated this project was not eligible for a "Letter of Emergency" permit. However, USACE recommended PBSD apply for the most appropriate, one- time, project-specific Nationwide 27 permit (NWP-27) intended for "environmental benefit and enhancement" versus a NWP-3 permit, a regular maintenance-type dredging permit. NWP-3 requires the dredged material taken off-site which is not only logistic and cost-prohibitive,but this USACE criteria violates Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) rules regarding placement of "beach-compatible sand"adjacent to the inlet to prevent erosion. Mr.Dorrill explained the Clam Pass construction plans are one of the required components to submit with the USACE NWP-27 permit application. The construction plans are also necessary to provide to pre- qualified, prospective dredging contractors to submit bids/proposals. In anticipation of receiving the plans by January 18, the PBSD Board decided to schedule a Special Session, Monday, January 21 at 9 a.m. at Club Pelican Bay to review the plans and approve a recommendation to the BCC for consideration January 22. Mr. Dorrill clarified the BCC determined this project is eligible for Tourist Development Council (TDC)Fund 195,or tourist tax dollars because the area adjacent to the inlet is public beach. Collier County has a permit to operate a beach "rake" that could be used to maintain the surface of the beach. However, Mr. Dorrill stressed there was a fine line between raking and grading. No work would be authorized that would put the FDEP permit-in-place at-risk. Mr.Hall clarified the FDEP permit-in-place is compatible with the proposed work in the USACE NWP- 27 application because it is less extensive. However,the same construction plans submitted to USACE NWP- 27 must also be submitted to FDEP to modify the FDEP permit-in-place for consistency before FDEP will issue the Notice to Proceed (NTP) to the contractor to begin the actual construction. Concurrently, Mr.Hall is also performing a biological monitoring(BO)study of migratory and nesting sea birds as required by U.S.Fish a Wildlife Service(USFWS)prior to the anticipated NTP with construction. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ms. Marcia Cravens mentioned other NWP permits not under consideration, and on: ed about an engineer's itinerary and the pending construction plans. Ms. Annice Gregerson : rned about stench and water quality. Dr. Ted Raia agreed the NWP-27 was project-ap. 0'P 'ate, b till concerned. Ms. Diane Lustig commended Mr. Dorrill for progress made and enco I a co inue moving forward; Mr. Scott Streckenbein agreed and commented on the "dig" and con . + : est from many diverse communities. Ms.Kathy Worley was concerned about the a oft • + ,•dge cut setting precedent for the long-term management plan. Ms. Cravens and Ms. . . + erned about new permits'compatibility with the 1998 permit. 18 i . , 161 2 A i4 . , Clam Bay Subcommittee Meeting Minutes January 15, 2013 CONCLUSION Staff would notify the Board when the construction plans are available by Friday, January 18 and confirm the Monday,January 21 at 9 a.m.Board Special Session at Club Pelican Bay. Mr.Hall distributed a sample invitation to participate in the development of an updated Clam Bay Management Plan he is sending to Clam Bay stakeholders. ADJOURN IMr. Cravens made a motion, second by Ms. Womble, to adjourn. The Subcommittee voted unanimously in favor,the motion passed,and the meeting was adjourned at 4:18 p.m. Susan O'Brien,Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 2/4/2013 10:03:28 AM 1p, ', ,;", 2 b � 19 i 161 2Aiq PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD SPECIAL SESSION MINUTES MONDAY,JANUARY 21,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Special Session on Monday,January 21 at 9:00 AM at The Club Pelican Bay,707 Gulf Park Drive,Naples,Florida. The following members were present: Pelican Bay Services Division Board Tom Cravens,Chairman John Iaizzo departed early Dave Trecker,Vice Chairman Michael Levy John P.Chandler Susan O'Brien Keith J.Dallas Mary Anne Womble Geoffrey S.Gibson departed early Hunter H.Hansen absent Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator Mary McCaughtry,Operations Analyst absent Kyle Lukasz,Operations Manager absent Lisa Resnick,Recording Secretary Also Present Kevin Carter,Field Manager,Dorrill Management Group Tim Hall,Turrell,Hall&Associates Jim Hoppensteadt,President&CEO,Pelican Bay Foundation Ken Humiston,P.E.,Humiston&Moore Engineers Brett Moore, P.E.,Humiston&Moore Engineers Kathy Worley,Conservancy of Southwest Florida 40 in audience AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Draft Clam Pass construction plans presentation by Ken Humiston,P.E.,and Brett D.Moore,P.E.,Humiston&Moore Engineers 3. Board Discussion 4. Audience Comments 5. *Approval of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners 6. Adjourn ROLL CALI, With the exception of Mr.Hansen,nine members were present. Mr.Iaizzo and Mr.Gibson depa the meeting early. AGENDA APPROVAL Ms. Womble made a motion,second by Mr.Dallas to approve the agenda as present Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. DRAFT CLAM PASS CONSTRUCTION PLANS PRESENTATION Mr. Ken Humiston presented the draft Clam Pass construction • ' rec• -ndation for the width of the dredge cut at the mouth of the Pass. The "natural wd f • c s-sectional area determines the volume of water that flows through the inlet and pot Ice i '.° nd out when waves push sand in The actual size of the cut depends upon the tida _, � e °.st monitoring data shows 8587 161 2A 141 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Special Session Minutes Monday,January 21, 2013 the equilibrium cross-sectional area is 200-300 square feet.The area is determined by multiplying the width by depth by slope. Humiston&Moore Engineers recommended a narrower dredge cut width of 45',depth of -4.5',and not as steep slope to limit the cross-sectional area toward the lower-range of 2002 feet;versus the prior recommendation to dredge a wider 60' cut, to a depth of-5' having a steeper slope that increased the cross-sectional area toward the higher-range of 3002 feet. To stabilize the Pass and prevent material from falling into the inlet during the post-dredge adjustment period,the beach adjacent to the inlet will be graded to an elevation above the Mean High Water line(MHW)at high tide. Mr. Humiston explained the type of permit determines what dredging equipment is used. Dredging work maybe done mechanically as it was in 1997 reaching Segments A and B only, not C, whereas a a hydraulic dredge as as used in 1999 could reach all Segments A,B,and C and would be more effective. Mr.Tim Hall clarified PBSD is submitting an application to USACE for Nationwide Permit 27 (NWP- 27) to open Clam Pass as soon as possible. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit-in-place will be modified accordingly for consistency. Mr. Dorrill concurred PBSD is submitting an application to USACE NWP-27 as recommended by USACE as the most appropriate and expeditious permit to have Clam Pass re-opened as soon as possible; versus NWP-3 that requires dredged material taken off-site. Removal of the dredged material from the site violates FDEP rules regarding placement of "beach-compatible sand" adjacent to the inlet. There are construction means and methods that can determine the type of equipment used and are dependent upon site conditions and the contractor's judgment. As stated in the Executive Summary of the proposed January 22 Board of County Commissioners' (BCC) add-on item, the recommendation is to approve the expedited bid solicitation process and direct the County Manager to issue work orders to the County's five pre-approved excavation-type contractors. Staff intends to discuss types of equipment recommended with these potential contractors and obtain base bids to dredge Segments A&B only(approximately 20,000 cubic yards of sand); then obtain ad-alternate bids to dredge Segment C only(approximately 7,000 cubic yards of sand). Mr.Humiston explained what an over-allowance is. As it is difficult to grade the bottom under water, the contractor must achieve a required depth,and given an over-allowance depth,that is"no more than"o half foot deeper than required depth. Mr. Humiston explained dredging Segment A is critical because it is the most dynamic.?_ where wave action along the beach pushes sand into the inlet and the place to where strong current current ..,:rt:o0 t nd out. According to monitoring data, tide range (decreasing) and phase lag (increasing) indicat=e ;10.11 ing of Segments B and C. In order to generate the strong currents, Segments B and C r•a anin_ $ he reason why dredge cuts are wider(than a prior recommendation)in Segments B and Some Board members were still concerned about wider dredge Se : and C and wanted assurance that the NWP-27 would not set precedent for future dr ts. Mr. Dorrill explained the NWP-27 permit is designed speci r d e, project-specific, single event and he had expressed clearly to USACE that PBS P.. .•rr tend the next three years, 8588 161 2Ai4' Pelican Bay Services Division Board Special Session Minutes Monday,January 21, 2013 (subject to funding and PBSD Board approval)to develop a comprehensive long-term Clam Bay Management Plan. Mr.Brett Moore reported he informed FDEP of the scope of changes to the FDEP Clam Pass dredging permit-in-place and urgent nature of the project,and FDEP is expediting the approval process. Mr.Dorrill added the FDEP permit-in-place is a 10-year Clam Pass dredging permit that must be modified for consistency with the NWP-27 prior to issuance of a Notice-To-Proceed(NTP)with construction. Mr.Hall estimated the NWP-27 permit application would be prepared and ready for submittal on January 23,but the construction plans Mr.Humiston is recommending and presenting are a required component. As far as timeline,he believed it was extremely optimistic for work to begin in March,but regardless,the construction must be complete by May 1,the start of Turtle Nesting Season. Mr. Dorrill is exploring possibilities for the contractors to work additional shifts or "around the clock"to meet the May 1 deadline. Ms.Kathy Worley explained possible environmental impacts of dredging Segment C wider or"wall- to-wall"including turbidity and exposed seagrasses,and was concerned this dredging project would set precedent for future dredging. Mr.Hall commented that with the Pass closed,problems are in process or already happening.It was apparent that water clarity is decreasing,which prevents light from penetrating to deeper depths which impacts fish and seagrass.Mangroves were not yet a concern until the rainy season when the possibility for submersion exists. He supported Humiston&Moore Engineers recommendation. Mr.Iaizzo departed the meeting. Before departing,Mr.Gibson stated he supported Humiston&Moore Engineers recommendation. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ms.Diane Lustig,Mr.Ken Dawson,Mr.Rick Dykman,Ms.Mary Johnson emphasized the urgency of obtaining a permit to open Clam Pass as soon as possible and supported Humiston&Moore Engineers recommendation. Ms.Linda Roth,Ms.Marcia Cravens did not support Humiston&Moore Engineers recommendati Mr.Bill Klauber was concerned about the proposed 24/7 construction and potential noise. BOARD DISCUSSION The Board agreed it was imperative for PBSD to proceed on an emergency basis with . tt a e NWP-27 application as USACE recommended was the most appropriate permit to have Clam Pas . ned as soon as possible.Some members were concerned about the wider cut proposed fo a C an. considered amending the construction plans and the suggestion troubled some Board • " t((:reed the Board should listen to the experts. Subsequently,Chairman Cravens call - f a mo on; and vote. 8589 i 161 2A 14-i Pelican Bay Services Division Board Special Session Minutes Monday,January 21,2013 APPROVAL OF PBSD RECOMMENDATION TO BCC Mr. Chandler made a motion, second by Mr. Dallas that the PBSD approve of a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners that the Clam Pass Construction plans as drawn on January 17,2013 by Humiston&Moore Engineers be utilized for an application of one-time permitting, specifically for emergency dredging to re-open Clam Pass. The Board voted 6-1 in favor and the motion passed.(O'Brien opposed) APPROVAL TO EXTEND MR.DORRILL'S CONTRACT Mr. Dorrill informed the Board on February 12 the BCC plans to discuss his management services contract that is set to expire in June 2013. Given the Clam Pass emergency conditions that exist and additional work required, the available options are to either: 1) begin the bid solicitation process anew for district administrative services; or 2) extend his management services contract by one-year and allow for an additional four-and-one-half hours compensatory time calculated on a weekly basis. Mr. Dallas made a motion, second by Ms. O'Brien that PBSD make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to extend Mr. Dorrill's management services contract by one- year and include an additional four-and-one-half hours (4.5 hours) of compensatory time calculated on a weekly basis. The Board voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. ADJOURN IVice Chairman Trecker made a motion, second by Chairman Cravens to adjourn. The Board voted unanimously in favor,the motion passed and meeting adjourned at 10:38 a.m. Tom Cravens,Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 2/6/2013 10:52:25 AM ' 4 8590 161 2A4'1((-/ AD-HOC COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP AN APPROACH FOR STUDYING PATHWAYS&TREES OF THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY,JANUARY 22,2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Ad-Hoc Committee to Develop an Approach for Studying Pathway s and Trees of the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met Tuesday,January 22,2013 at 1:00 PM at the Community Center at Pelican Bay,8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples,Florida. The following members were present: Ad-Hoc Committee to Develop an Approach for Studying Pathways&Trees Keith J.Dallas,Chairman Dave Trecker Tom Cravens Mary Anne Womble absent Pelican Bay Services Division Board John Iaizzo Susan O'Brien Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W.Neil Dorrill,Administrator Mary McCaughtry,Operations Analyst Kyle Lukasz,Operations Manager Lisa Resnick,Recording Secretary Also Present Ian Orlikoff,ISA Certified Arborist 14 in the audience AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Tree Health along Pelican Bay Boulevard presentation by Ian Orlikoff,Certified Arborist 3. Audience Comments 4. Adjourn ROLL CALL With the exception of Ms.Mary Anne Womble,all Ad-Hoc Committee members were present. INTRODUCTION Chairman Dallas explained that in light of increased Clam Bay responsibilities given to the Pelican Bay Services Division,and the recent Pelican Bay Boulevard pathways repaving done by the County,he mentioned lowering the priority of the pathways project,with the exception of Mr.Ian Orlikoff Certified Arborist's initial evaluation of the tree canopy. TREE HEALTH ALONG PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PRESENTATION BY IAN ORLIKOFF.ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST 411V' Mr.Ian Orlikoff,Certified Arborist,presented an initial analysis of the tree canop i, + west side of Pelican Bay Boulevard(from The Commons to North Tram)for the ulti tate goal• developing a tree canopy management plan that is flexible,and can be implemen °+ + a r an. offers alternative designs and materials.He stressed the importance of investing i . ° ts, which will reduce costs over time,infrastructure damage,and potential.' + Mr.Orlikoff evaluated specific trees and recommended mit',a + ® t••1,ter curve pathways around trees,or construct pathways using flexible perme.± ° +. ii)soct did advise removing several trees due to lack of structural integrity c. - •.'® `f ttilWoartp to accommodate 4 i . 161 2 A 4 Ad-Hoc Committee to Develop an Approach for Studying Pathways and Trees Meetin g Minutes Tuesday,January 22,2013 previous pathways installations.He did not recommend using root barriers that can predispose trees . to fail. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Comments made to encourage involving homeowners associations adjacent to the evaluation areas prior to taking recommended actions;and to expand the evaluation area,include the impact to the tree canopy,and incorporate cost of an expanded evaluation into next year's budget. Mr.Lukasz clarified that the Pelican Bay Services Division or County was responsible for the area between the pathway and the street;and the association was responsible for the area between the pathway and private property. Mr.Orlikoff estimated the cost to prepare today's initial evaluation of the section of Pelican Bay Boulevard(from The Commons to the North Tram)was approximately$500. Dr. Trecker made a motion,second by Mr.Cravens to make a recommendation to the Pelican Bay Services Division Board to have Mr. Ian Orlikoff, Certified Arborist evaluate the trees along the entire length of Pelican Bay Boulevard. The Subcommittee voted unanimously in favor and the motion passed. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Cravens made made a motion, second by Chairman Dallas to adjourn. The Subcommittee voted unanimously in favor,the motion passed,and meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m. Keith J.Dallas,Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 2/11/2013 9:42:02 AM 41%5 • 161 2Ai � February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Re ular Session 5b.Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Permit Update Page 1 of 6 TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARINE&ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue, Suite B •Naples,Florida 34104-3732 •(239)643-0166 •Fax(239)643-6632 January 25,2013 Tunis W.McElwain Chief,Fort Myers Section U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Fort Myers Regulatory Office 1520 Royal Palm Square Boulevard,Suite 310 Fort Myers,Florida 33919 RE: Corps Application No.: SAJ-1996-02789 Project: Clam Pass Dredging County: Collier Tunis, The enclosed application is a request for a Nationwide 27 permit authorization to conduct a single event excavation and dredging activity at Clam Pass. As you are aware,the Pass closed in late December 2012, and as a result of the closure,tidal exchange to the estuary system has been cut off. The Pelican Bay Community has put a lot of effort and expense into the restoration and enhancement of the mangrove system, and this effort is dependant on tidal exchange being maintained. Nationwide Permit 27 was established to allow for restoration and enhancement projects such as this and based on our previous conversations with your office;we believe that it is the best option available to restore tidal flow as quickly as possible. The intent under the Nationwide 27 is to address the immediate problem as expeditiously as possible,to give the County time to develop a more long term solution that will be intended to avoid problems like this in the future. The Project Purpose is to restore tidal flushing to the Clam Bay Estuary system and maintain restoration and enhancement achievements previously realized within the system. The Project Description is as follows. The proposed project will remove sand from the pass and associated flood shoal areas to restore tidal flow to the estuary. Dredging and excavation will be done by backhoe, hydraulic dredge,or a combination of both. Beach compatible sand will be deposited on the adjacent beaches as required by Chapter 161,Florida Statutes. Excavation and dredging work is divided into three zones as depicted on the enclosed project plans. Channel width will be a maximum of 45 feet bottom width through Section A and a design depth of-4.5 feet NGVD(-5.8 feet NAVD). A 0.5 foot over-dredge allowance will be allowed which would result in a maximum excavation/dredge depth of-5.0 feet NGVD. Widths through Sections B and C will vary according to the enclosed project plans which are based on a recent survey completed earlier this month. A minimum of a 5 foot offset buffer will be maintained between Page 1 of 3 6I 2 A 1 February 13,20 elican Ba Services Division Boar Regular Session ry Y 5b.Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Permit Update Page 2 of 6 the excavation and dredging and any mangrove prop roots growing adjacent to the dredge template. It is anticipated that approximately 21,000 cubic yards of sand will be removed from the Pass and flood shoal area. Approximately 4,300 cubic yards will be placed to the north of the Pass in the old channel meander (approximately 0.6 acre of which is below MHW). The remaining 17,000 cubic yards will be placed to the south of the Pass, starting at the north end of the depicted footprint and continuing south until the sand is expended(approximately 3 to 4 acres of this beach disposal area lies below MHW). Material excavated with a backhoe will be loaded into haul trucks and dumped in the proper locations on the beach with a lateral berm extending ahead of the discharge parallel to the shoreline to reduce turbidity and mixing in the nearshore. Material that is dredged hydraulically will be pumped to the appropriate location on the beach. Once placed,material will be spread and contoured with loaders,bulldozers,or other suitable beach grading equipment. Although not anticipated,any non-beach compatible material will be stockpiled within the staging area and hauled away to an appropriate upland disposal site landward of the CCCL. Equipment access to the beach will occur from beach access locations previously used in this area approximately 2.4 miles north and 2 miles south of the Pass or may be delivered directly to the site by barge at the discretion of the contractor. Work areas and travel corridors will be roped off to warn visitors to the beach of the construction operations and to keep them out of the work areas. The work is expected to take between 30 and 60 days.to complete. In order to expedite the work and complete operations before the sea turtle nesting season,the County would like to explore the possibility of working 16 or 24 hour days. This would allow the County to excavate and stockpile material during daylight hours, and spread the material on the beach disposal areas during evening hours. Listed Species: The applicant is willing and able to abide by the protection measures outlined in the SPBO for nesting sea turtles,nests and eggs as well as for manatees. It is the intent of the County to complete all activities prior to the May 1 start of sea turtle nesting season. No impacts to these species are anticipated. The closure of the pass prevents smalltooth sawfish from entering or leaving the bay system. Opening it up again will re-establish the access into the Bay system and allow for smalltooth sawfish utilization that is not currently available. Excavation and dredging of the pass is not expected to adversely affect the smalltooth sawfish and should in fact increase habitat availability and utilization within the Clam Bay system for this species. The project is outside of the identified Critical Habitat Units for the Piping Plover. It is approximately 20 miles north of Map Unit 27 on Marco Island and approximately 14 miles south of Map Unit 26 on Estero Island. However,Primary Constituent Elements(PCEs)for piping plover wintering habitat,those habitat components that support foraging,roosting,and sheltering,and the physical features necessary for maintaining the natural processes that support these habitat components,are present in the project area. PCEs of wintering piping plover critical habitat include sand or mud flats with no or sparse emergent vegetation. Adjacent unvegetated or sparsely vegetated sand,mud,or algal flats above high tide are also important. Important components of the beach/dune ecosystem include surf-cast algae,sparsely vegetated back beach and salterns,spits,and washover areas. Washover areas are broad,unvegetated zones,with little or no topographic relief,that are formed and maintained by the action of hurricanes,storm surge,or other extreme wave action. The project area contains beach and dune areas as well as tidal flats within the Bay system. No washover areas are present. The closure of the pass has resulted in a lack of tidal exchange within the Bays so the tidal flats are not currently subject to the rise and fall of the tide and therefore are not as available to foraging and roosting piping plovers as they would be with the opening of the Pass. The enclosed exhibits depict the closest defined critical habitat units and the tidal areas Page 2 of 3 .2A r 13,2 Pe ican La Services Division Boar Regular Session Feb�ary y 9 5b.Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Permit Update • Page 3 of 6 lost and gained as a result of the proposed project. Further coordination of potential impacts to piping plovers resulting from this project will be undertaken with the USFWS. As discussed during our conversations with you and your staff during our meeting at your office,and depicted in this submittal,the project proposed will enhance and restore habitat that is in the process of being degraded by the Pass closure. Maintaining tidal flow into the estuary has been shown to be a vital component to the health and stability of the system. The proposed project will result in benefits to listed species,water quality,mangroves, and seagrasses,as well as to the myriad of other vertebrate and invertebrate species that call this estuary home. As such,we believe that the proposed project meets the qualifications for the Nationwide 27 permit and would appreciate your concurrence on this. It is also important to realize that this application for a single dredging activity is not intended to set a precedent for future dredging events. Future events,as may be needed,will be based on conditions at the time of the dredging proposal and may or may not require the same template to achieve/maintain the enhancement goals of the project. Coordination.with USFWS will continue to alleviate the potential Piping Plover concerns related to the placement of the sand on the adjacent beach areas. As you are aware,the project is-of high importance to the community. The County has declared this a state of environmental emergency and the Board of County Commissioners has waived the normal contractor bidding procedures to expedite the selection of a contractor to commence with the project immediately upon authorization by your agency and the DEP. We would appreciate all efforts that can be made to expedite the review and permitting of this project. A copy of this information will be forwarded to the USFWS along with a request to review the proposed project changes in relation to the existing Draft Biological Opinion. We believe that the proposed changes result in no additional impacts to listed species. We will be asking FWS to review the submittal and offer their comments on the proposed changes. A modification to the FDEP permit which had previously been issued with a wider dredge template in Section A than what is currently proposed herein will be submitted shortly for the proposed changes to the template. We will keep the Corps informed as to the status of that application and the subsequent FDEP review. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions or comments regarding this submittal. Sincerely, 7 Timothy Hall Page 3 of 3 16 ( .2 c Februa 13 2013 Pelican ay Services Ditris�on Bo rd Regular Session rY 13, Y 9 5b.Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Permit Update Page 4 of 6 HUMISTON &MOORE ENGINEERS5679 STRAND COURT € . I 1 COASTAL NAPLES,FLORIDA 34110 ENGINEERING DESIGN FAX:239 594 2025 AND PERMITTING PHONE:239 594 2021 January 31, 2013 Sent via FedEx Elizabeth Young, Permit Manager DEP Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems 4708 Capital Circle N.W. Tallahassee, FL 32303 Re: Updated Plans and Applicant Information DEP Permit 0296087-001-JC HM File No. HM13-078, Clam Pass Dear Liz, This is a follow up to our meeting on January 11, 2013 regarding the status of Clam Pass being closed and the need for quick action to reopen the inlet. I advised that a survey was being completed to document current conditions, which was used to prepare corresponding updated plans. At that time I also advised that there was a change in management of the permit from the County. A letter from the county clarifying the new applicant and agents will be sent separately from the County Manager's office. Enclosed are two sets of signed and sealed construction plans for the dredging of Clam Pass. These plans have been prepared for current condition and are intended for this specific dredging event. The purpose of this dredging is to open the inlet for the environmental benefit and restoration of tidal flushing of the bay system. The County has declared this as an environmental emergency and has approved a change in the normal procedures of the purchasing Department to allow for an expedited selection of a contractor. A Pre-Bid meeting was held this past Tuesday, January 29, 2013 and bids are due next Friday. Once selected we would like to schedule our pre- construction conference with the Department as soon as possible and allow for mobilization of the contractor with construction commencing immediately upon approval of the pending Corps of Engineers' permit. We anticipate that all of Sections A and B will be dredged. Section C has been included as an alternative bid item depending on the capabilities of the contractors submitting bids. While it would be desirable to dredge Section C, we do not consider it necessary to meet the immediate emergency of reopening the inlet, and if C is not dredged at this time, it is intended that through completion of this immediate necessary dredging operation the inlet will remain open a sufficient time to allow for evaluation of a long term dredging program for this system. Given this extreme condition and need for immediate action, we appreciate everything the Department can do to expedite approval of this plan. As you can see from the timeline above, it is our intent to complete this work as soon as possible to potentially avoid the sea turtle nesting season. tt L _ 'February 3 Pelican Bay�erv�e�Division Board Regular Session �Y � 9 5b.Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Permit Update • Page 5 of 6 Once you review this request, please give me a call to discuss the sufficiency of the plans and if you need anything else to approve this specific project. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely yours, HUMISTON MO-021 F NGINEERS Brett D. Moore, P.E. Enclosure Copy to: Neil Dorrill, Administrator, Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Tim Hall, Turrell Hall and Associates, Inc. 161 2 , t� Bay Services Division Board RA gular Session February 13,2013 Pelican y g 5b.Administrator's Report-Clam Pass Permit Update Page 6 of 6 °IAA Office of the County Manager Leo E. Ochs, Jr. ©trsi 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 202•Naples Florida 34112-5746•(239)252-8383•FAX:(239)252-4010 February 1,2013 Ms. Elizabeth Young, Permit Manager FDEP Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems 4708 Capital Circle, N.W. Tallahassee, FL 32303 RE: Collier County Clam Pass Permit No.0296087-001-1C Dear Ms.Young: As a result of recent action by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners concerning the above permit,please note the following: Permittee: Collier County c/o W. Neil Dorrill,Administrator Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive,Suite 605 Naples, FL 34108 Authorized Agents: Humiston and Moore Engineers c/o Brett D. Moore,P.E. 5679 Strand Court Naples, FL 34110 Turrell Hall and Associates c/o Tim Hall 3584 Exchange Avenue,Suite B Naples, FL 34104 If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Leo .Ochs,Jr. County Manager,' CC: Collier •••my Board of County Commissioners W. Neil Dorrill,Administrator,Pelican Bay Services Division Brett Moore, P.E., Humiston and Moore Engineers Tim Hall,Turrell Hall and Associates Februa ry 13,201 elican Ba Services isl6rlBoard I egular Session 5c. Administrator's Report-Crosswalk Standards(John Chandler) Page 1 of 4 Original Message From: Jim Carr [mailto:carr @abbinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06,2013 10:32 AM To: ResnickLisa Subject: RE: Crosswalk Standards Lisa, Regarding Question#2,there is not a local or state standard for minimum pedestrian volumes in warranting a crosswalk. The MUTCD and Florida Green Book standards suggest and/or require how the crosswalks are to be marked(width,location, signage and marking, etc.). A crosswalk is defined by MUTCD 2009 Edition as: "(a)that part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs or in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway,and in the absence of a sidewalk on one side of the roadway,the part of a roadway included within the extension of the lateral lines of the sidewalk at right angles to the center line; (b)any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated as a pedestrian crossing by pavement marking lines on the surface, which might be supplemented by contrasting pavement texture, style,or color." So, according to(a), crosswalks are the portions of roadway that connect sidewalks at intersections, whether the area is marked or not. Crosswalks at intersections should be marked to provide guidance where pedestrians are expected to cross, regardless of pedestrian volumes. Older existing intersections may or may not be marked at all legs of the intersection. New construction would implement current marking and signage standards. Pedestrian volume is only a consideration, among many other things,when determining a midblock crossing location between intersections. The question was specific to crossings across Pelican Bay Boulevard such as North Pointe and Crayton where there is no stop condition on PBB (the stop is only at the side street). These crosswalks are currently marked with sign and striping. Eliminating them would not be justified and would not be permitted by Collier County Traffic Operations. Adding new striping, contrasting pavement texture and color, and advance warning signage is not required at the existing crosswalks, but would provide additional measures to alert pedestrians and road users of the pedestrian use as a crossing location. The two crosswalks on Gulf Park Drive are similar to the two on PBB, however the Gulf Park Drive crosswalks are not currently marked with sign and striping. Although the County wouldn't require new markings at this time,these should be signed and marked per current standards for the same reasons, regardless of pedestrian volume. Attached is the Pedestrian Crossing section(two pages)from the Florida Greenbook for reference. Jim Carr, P.E. Agnoli, Barber& Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 239.597.3111 ext. 215 239.566.2203 fax February,13,20131&ic63ajServices 2silloard Regular Session 5c. Administrator's Report-Crosswalk Standards(John Chandler) Page 2 of 4 Original Message • From: ResnickLisa[mailto:LResnick@colliergov.net colliergov.net<mailto:LResnick(&,colliergov.net>] Sent: Thursday,January 24,2013 4:18 PM To: Jim Carr Mr. Chandler is requesting the County and State crosswalk standards for crosswalks, specifically: Original Message From: John Chandler [mailto:johnchandler219Agmail.com<mai lto:johnchandler219 @gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday,January 23, 2013 1:20 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Re: Feb 13 Agenda Requests -County and State standards for minimum volume of pedestrians required to warrant a crosswalk(other than at a Stop sign). This should be presented by Staff and relates to whether or not the existing walks crossing PBB at North Pointe and Crayton should be bricked or eliminated.This information is also relevant to potentially adding crosswalks across Gulf Park Drive. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks, Lisa February 13,2013 I aoy lervices 2oAar\tguiar Session 5c. Administrator's Report-Crosswalk Standards(John Chandler) Page 3 of 4 I Topic#625-000-015 May-2011 Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways F PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS • The design of pedestrian crossings and parallel pathways within the right of way shall be considered an integral part of the overall design of a street or highway. The development of protection at any remaining crossings or conflict points must be adequate to achieve a total pedestrian transportation mode that is reasonably safe. F.1 Crosswalks Crosswalks serve as the pedestrian right-of-way across streets. A crosswalk is: (a) that part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway, measured from the curbs or, in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway; (b) any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. The design of pedestrian crosswalks should be based on the following requirements: • Crosswalks should be placed at locations with ample sight distances • At crossings, the roadway should be free from changes in alignment or cross section • The entire length of crosswalk shall be visible to drivers at a sufficient distance to allow a stopping maneuver • Stop bars or yield markings, in conjunction with the appropriate signing,shall be provided at all marked crosswalks • All crosswalks shall be easily identified and clearly delineated, in accordance with Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Rule 14-15.010) F.1.a Marked Crosswalks Marked crosswalks are one tool to allow pedestrians to cross the roadway safely. They are often used in combination with other treatments (signs, flashing beacons, curb extensions, pedestrian signals, raised median or refuge islands, and enhanced overhead lighting). Marked crosswalks serve two purposes: 1) to inform motorists of the location of a pedestrian crossing so that they have time to lawfully yield to a crossing pedestrian; and 2) to Pedestrian Facilities 8-8 1 6 lie February 13,2013T�lic�l'f Ba Services ivisi n oard gular Session 5c. Administrator's Report-Crosswalk Standards(John Chandler) Page 4 of 4 Topic#625-000-015 May-2011 Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways . assure the pedestrian that a legal crosswalk exists at a particular location. - Marked crosswalks shall not be installed in an uncontrolled environment (without signals, stop signs, or yield signs) when the posted speeds are greater than 40 mph, or on multilane roads where traffic volumes exceed 12,000 vpd (without raised median) or 15,000 vpd (with raised median). Marked crosswalks can also be used to create midblock crossings. F.1.b Midblock Crosswalks Midblock crossings help meet crossing needs within an area. At specific locations where intersections are spaced relatively far apart or substantial pedestrian generators are located between intersections, midblock crossing may be used; however, since midblock crossings are not generally expected by motorists, they should be well signed and marked. Midblock crossings are located according to a number of factors including pedestrian volume, traffic volume, roadway width, traffic speed and type, desired paths for pedestrians, land use, and to accommodate transit connectivity. Midblock crossings should not be installed where sight distance or sight lines are limited for either the motorist or pedestrian. Midblock crossings should be illuminated, marked, and outfitted with advanced warning signs or warning flasher in accordance with the MUTCD. F.1.c Crossing Distance Considerations At mid block locations where roadway crossings exceed sixty feet, or where there are a limited number of gaps in traffic, a median or crossing island should be considered and be accessible. When a midblock crossing is provided along a multilane arterial, a median or crossing island is desirable, and consideration should be given to providing supplementary traffic control devices (signs, beacons, signals, etc.). F.2 Curb Ramps Curb ramps provide access between the sidewalk and the street for people who use mobility aids such as wheelchairs and scooters, people pushing strollers and pulling suitcases, children on bicycles, and delivery services. Curb ramps, with detectable warnings, meeting the requirements of ADA Standards for Accessible Pedestrian Facilities 8-9 161 2A � February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular S2ssion �Y Y 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 1 of 12 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-January 31,2013 Operating Fund 109-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments 2,383,956.59 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 1,085,189.35 Due from Property Appraiser - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 3,469,145.94 Total Assets $ 3,469,145.94 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 53,739.30 Accrued Wages Payable - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 17,261.44 Total Liabilities $ 71,000.74 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 900,302.49 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 2,497,842.71 Total Fund Balance 3,398,145.20 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,469,145.94 I _ 161 2A \ February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session eb uary y g 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 2 of 12 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-January 31,2013 Operating Fund 109-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 951,600.00 $ 951,600.00 $ 951,600.00 $ - Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 695,000.00 576,850.00 579,047.26 2,197.26 Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 1,878,800.00 1,559,404.00 1,565,095.00 5,691.00 Charges for Services 1,500.00 - - - Insurance Company Refunds - - 1,549.74 1,549.74 Surplus Property Sales - - - Revenue Reserve (128,700.00) - Interest 15,800.00 5,266.67 2,064.89 (3,201.78) Total Operating Revenues $ 3,414,000.00 $ 3,093,120.67 $ 3,099,356.89 $ 6,236.22 Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense $ 42,000.00 $ 12,900.00 $ 9,337.33 $ 3,562.67 Emergency Maintenace and Repairs 8,800.00 - - - IT Direct Capital 200.00 - - - IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 4,600.00 460.00 400.00 60.00 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 85,100.00 42,600.00 42,550.00 50.00 Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 13,400.00 6,700.00 6,700.00 - Other Contractural Services 29,700.00 9,900.00 8,275.00 1,625.00 Telephone 3,900.00 1,300.00 1,073.40 226.60 Postage and Freight 2,200.00 700.00 3.97 696.03 Rent Buildings and Equipment 11,000.00 4,600.00 4,492.23 107.77 Insurance-General 1,000.00 - - - Printing,Binding and Copying 1,800.00 200.00 10.47 189.53 Clerk's Recording Fees 1,500.00 - - - Advertising 1,500.00 - - - Other Office and Operating Supplies 2,000.00 700.00 71.15 628.85 Training and Education 1,100.00 400.00 352.95 47.05 Total Water Management Admin Operating $ 209,800.00 $ 80,460.00 $ 73,266.50 $ 7,193.50 Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 135,800.00 $ 41,800.00 $ 31,725.04 $ 10,074.96 Engineering Fees 10,000.00 3,300.00 1,728.90 1,571.10 Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 18,000.00 6,000.00 1,468.33 4,531.67 Landscape Materials/Replanting Program 8,500.00 700.00 - 700.00 Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 30,100.00 10,000.00 2,382.50 7,617.50 Plan Review Fees 1,500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 1,000.00 300.00 - 300.00 Temporary Labor 44,900.00 26,800.00 30,984.00 (4,184.00) Telephone 500.00 200.00 148.11 51.89 Trash and Garbage 5,700.00 1,500.00 2,787.00 (1,287.00) Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 100.00 122.50 (22.50) Insurance-General 2,400.00 - - - Insurance-Auto 900.00 - - - Building Repairs&Mntc. 1,700.00 - - - Fleet Maintenance and Parts 2,400.00 2,400.00 3,596.25 (1,196.25) Fuel and Lubricants 3,300.00 1,100.00 780.62 319.38 Tree Triming 36,000.00 12,000.00 7,488.00 4,512.00 Clothing and Uniforms 1,100.00 500.00 579.75 (79.75) Page 1of3 l_ ._ 161 2A1 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Se sion 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 3 of 12 Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 767.12 (267.12) Fertilizer and Herbicides 98,400.00 25,100.00 21,347.67 3,752.33 Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 1,100.00 2,274.10 (1,174.10) _ Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 800.00 1,164.78 (364.78) Total Water Management Field Operating $ 406,800.00 $ 134,200.00 $ 109,344.67 $ 24,855.33 Right of Way Beautification-Operating Payroll Expense $ 43,300.00 $ 13,300.00 $ 9,620.68 $ 3,679.32 Emergency Repairs and Maintenance 7,400.00 - - - IT Direct Capital 200.00 - - - Office Automation 9,500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 37,100.00 12,400.00 9,110.00 3,290.00 Telephone 3,900.00 1,300.00 1,072.40 227.60 Postage 2,200.00 700.00 3.97 696.03 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 12,200.00 5,100.00 4,891.93 208.07 Insurance-General 500.00 - - - Printing,Binding and Copying 2,600.00 400.00 - 400.00 Clerk's Recording 2,000.00 300.00 - 300.00 Legal Advertising 2,000.00 300.00 - 300.00 Office Supplies General 2,500.00 600.00 71.15 528.85 Training and Education 1,500.00 500.00 453.30 46.70 Total Right of Way Beautification Operating $ 126,900.00 $ 34,900.00 $ 25,223.43 $ 9,676.57 Right of Way Beautification-Field Payroll Expense $ 797,000.00 $ 245,200.00 $ 174,357.06 $ 70,842.94 Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 1,100.00 809.68 290.32 Flood Control(Water Use&Swale/Berm Mntc.) 89,900.00 30,800.00 30,840.06 (40.06) Pest Control 6,000.00 3,200.00 3,625.00 (425.00) Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 800.00 582.82 217.18 Other Contractural Services 29,500.00 15,000.00 13,841.00 1,159.00 Temporary Labor 201,400.00 87,300.00 86,253.44 1,046.56 Telephone 3,200.00 1,100.00 656.17 443.83 Electricity*$2,620 J/E pending to SL Fund 778 3,400.00 1,100.00 3,283.01 * (2,183.01) Trash and Garbage 17,000.00 4,500.00 4,519.90 (19.90) Rent Equipment 2,500.00 2,100.00 2,598.99 (498.99) Motor Pool Rental Charge 500.00 200.00 - 200.00 Insurance-General 9,300.00 - - Insurance-Auto 10,000.00 - - - Building Repairs and Maintenance 1,700.00 600.00 600.00 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 17,600.00 5,900.00 7,413.25 (1,513.25) Fuel and Lubricants 64,600.00 19,500.00 10,024.38 9,475.62 Licenses,Permits,Training 800.00 300.00 - 300.00 Tree Triming 64,500.00 9,700.00 - 9,700.00 Clothing and Uniforms 9,400.00 2,000.00 1,907.98 92.02 Personal Safety Equipment 3,000.00 1,000.00 796.97 203.03 Fertilizer and Herbicides 62,000.00 32,500.00 33,508.17 (1,008.17) Landscape Maintenance 46,000.00 30,700.00 36,146.25 (5,446.25) Mulch/Landscape Materials 52,000.00 44,200.00 33,092.50 11,107.50 Pathway Repairs 6,000.00 2,000.00 - 2,000.00 Sprinkler Maintenance 30,000.00 11,800.00 11,125.70 674.30 Painting Supplies 800.00 300.00 43.88 256.12 Traffic Signs 3,000.00 1,000.00 - 1,000.00 Minor Operating Equipment 3,700.00 1,200.00 857.65 342.35 Other Operating Supplies 9,000.00 3,000.00 2,327.57 672.43 Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 1,549,600.00 $ 558,100.00 $ 458,611.43 $ 99,488.57 Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,293,100.00 $ 807,660.00 $ 666,446.03 $ 141,213.97 Page 2 of 3 i 66 2 February 13,2013 Pelican S�Gice Division 60Trd tgular Se Sion 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 4 of 12 . Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations - Other Machinery and Equipment $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ - General Improvements - - - - Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Right of Way Beautification-Field Autos and Trucks $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 31,907.38 $ 3,092.62 . Other Machinery and Equipmeny 1,000.00 - - - Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 36,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 31,907.38 $ 3,092.62 Total Capital Expenditures $ 37,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 31,907.38 $ 3,092.62 Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,330,100.00 $ 842,660.00 $ 698,353.41 $ 144,306.59 Non-Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 $ 241,700.00 $ 241,700.00 $ 241,700.00 $ - Tax Collector Fees 79,300.00 47,580.00 42,923.24 4,656.76 Property Appraiser Fees 72,900.00 43,740.00 39,607.92 4,132.08 Reserves(2 1/2 months for Operations) 533,400.00 550,400.00 550,400.00 - Reserve for Operating Fund Capital Improvement 65,000.00 - - - Reserves for Equipment 107,800.00 107,800.00 107,800.00 - Reserved for Attrition (16,200.00) (16,200.00) (16,200.00) - Revenue Reserve - - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 1,083,900.00 $ 975,020.00 $ 966,231.16 $ 8,788.84 Total Expenditures $ 3,414,000.00 $ 1,817,680.00 $ 1,664,584.57 $ 153,095.43 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,275,440.67 $ 1,434,772.32 $ 159,331.65 Page 3 of 3 161 2 '� � February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Re ular S ssion ry Y egular Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 5 of 12 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-January 31,2013 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 710,448.04 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 54,386.52 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 764,834.56 Total Assets $ 764,834.56 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 42.00 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 42.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance- unreserved 401,763.99 Excess Revenue(Expenditures) 363,028.57 Total Fund Balance 764,792.56 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 764,834.56 i 6 2 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay errvices Diviion BoardR�g I i ry ss on 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 6 of 12 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-January 31,2013 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 376,200.00 $ 376,200.00 $ 376,200.00 $ - Curent Ad Valorem Tax 440,700.00 352,560.00 359,162.44 $ 6,602.44 Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax $ - Insurance Claim 1,286.80 $ 1,286.80 Revenue Reserve $ (22,300.00) Interest 6,700.00 670.00 631.24 $ (38.76) Total Operating Revenues 801,300.00 729,430.00 737,280.48 7,850.48 Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense $ 42,200.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 10,570.89 $ 2,429.11 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 8,700.00 $ 4,350.00 4,350.00 $ - Other Contractural Services 26,900.00 $ 8,966.67 8,275.00 $ 691.67 Telephone 3,600.00 $ 1,200.00 853.10 $ 346.90 Postage and Freight 2,000.00 $ 500.00 3.97 $ 496.03 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 11,800.00 $ 4,900.00 4,727.14 $ 172.86 Insurance-General 300.00 $ - - $ - Office Supplies General 800.00 $ 300.00 42.00 $ 258.00 Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,000.00 $ 300.00 - $ 300.00 Total Street Lighting Admin Operating 97,300.00 33,516.67 28,822.10 4,694.57 Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense 63,900.00 19,700.00 17,136.33 2,563.67 Emergency Maintenance& Repairs 9,600.00 - - - Other Contractual Services 800.00 300.00 - 300.00 Telephone 500.00 200.00 108.12 91.88 Electricity 44,200.00 14,700.00 8,084.91 6,615.09 Insurance-General 900.00 - - - Insurance-Auto 900.00 - - - Building Maintenace& Repairs 1,700.00 - - - Fleet Maintenance and Parts 1,500.00 500.00 90.00 410.00 Fuel and Lubricants 900.00 300.00 219.29 80.71 Other Equipment Repairs/Supplies 200.00 100.00 - 100.00 Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 200.00 - 200.00 Electrical Contractors 7,300.00 2,400.00 - 2,400.00 Page 1 of 2 161 2A1� February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 7 of 12 Light Bulb Ballast 13,100.00 4,300.00 4,271.96 28.04 Total Street Lighting Field Operating 146,000.00 42,700.00 29,910.61 12,789.39 Total Field Expenditures 243,300.00 76,216.67 58,732.71 17,483.96 Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery/Equipment 1,000.00 - - - General Improvements - - - - Total Capital Expenditures 1,000.00 - - - Total Operating Expenditures 244,300.00 76,216.67 58,732.71 17,483.96 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees 13,700.00 8,220.00 7,225.99 994.01 Property Appraiser Fees 9,000.00 900.00 - 900.00 Reserve for Future Construction 444,200.00 444,200.00 444,200.00 - Reserves(2 1/2 mos.for Operations) 57,600.00 57,600.00 57,600.00 - Reserves for Equipment 32,500.00 32,500.00 32,500.00 - Revenue Reserve - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures 557,000.00 543,420.00 541,525.99 1,894.01 Total Expenditures 801,300.00 619,636.67 600,258.70 19,377.97 Net Profit/(Loss) - 109,793.33 137,021.78 27,228.45 Page 2 of 2 i lo February 13,2013 Pelican Bale ry s ision Bo Rr'g�la r Ass s n 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 8 of 12 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-January 31,2013 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 154,857.49 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 287,297.40 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets 442,154.89 Total Assets $ 442,154.89 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 71.50 Accrued Wages Payable Total Liabilities 71.50 Fund Balance Fund Balance- unreserved 200,198.08 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 241,885.31 Total Fund Balance 442,083.39 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 442,154.89 i 1 16I 2Ai 4 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget-January 31,2013 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Qperating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 354,800.00 $ 354,800.00 $ 354,800.00 $ - Special Assessment 134,400.00 111,552.00 111,918.81 366.81 Miscellaneous Income - - Fund 111 32,300.00 - - - Revenue Reserve (6,800.00) - - Interest 800.00 300.00 440.55 140.55 Total Operating Revenues $ 515,500.00 $ 466,652.00 $ 467,159.36 $ 507.36 Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees $ 164,478.75 $ 6,416.67 $ 4,080.00 $ 2,336.67 Other Contractural Services 10,464.65 6,802.02 6,761.58 40.44 Tree Trimming 67,000.00 11,200.00 7,488.00 3,712.00 Other Equipment Repairs 577.77 - - - Aerial Photography 15,000.00 7,500.00 5,449.80 2,050.20 Minor Operating 2,988.01 - - - Other Operating Supplies 1,500.00 - - - Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 262,009.18 $ 31,918.69 $ 23,779.38 $ 8,139.31 Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees $ - $ - $ 9,261.25 $ (9,261.25) Licenses and Permits - - - - Other Contractual Services 212,859.25 202,216.29 189,123.80 13,092.49 Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ 212,859.25 $ 202,216.29 $ 198,385.05 $ 3,831.24 Total Capital Expenditures $ 11,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 485,868.43 $ 234,134.98 $ 222,164.43 $ 11,970.55 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 4,200.00 $ 3,360.00 $ 2,226.35 $ 1,133.65 Property Appraiser Fees 2,700.00 2,160.00 2,015.21 144.79 Reserves for Operations 22,700.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 29,600.00 $ 5,520.00 $ 4,241.56 $ 1,278.44 Page 1 of 2 161 2A + Total Expenditures $ 515,468.43 $ 239,654.98 $ 226,405.99 $ 13,248.99 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 226,997.02 $ 240,753.37 $ 13,756.35 Page 2 of 2 161 2A February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d.Administrator's Report-Monthly Financial Report,January 2013 Page 11 of 12 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-January 31,2013 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 2,730,265.76 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 1,213,800.81 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets 3,944,066.57 Total Assets $ 3,944,066.57 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 18,826.00 Goods Received Inv. Received 8,689.71 Total Liabilities 27,515.71 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 2,501,578.47 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 1,414,972.39 Total Fund Balance 3,916,550.86 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,944,066.57 161 2Af Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-January 31, 2013 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2013 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 2,618,011.49 $ 2,618,011.49 $ 2,618,011.49 $ - Transfer from Fund 109 General 241,700.00 241,700.00 241,700.00 - Foundation Payment for Crosswalks - - - - Special Assessment 324,400.00 269,252.00 270,323.10 1,071.10 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - - Interest 25,700.00 6,425.00 3,780.62 (2,644.38) Total Operating Revenues $ 3,209,811.49 $ 3,135,388.49 $3,133,815.21 $ (1,573.28) Operating Expenditures: Irrigation &Landscaping Hardscape Project(50066) Engineering Fees $ 125,332.12 $ 20,888.69 $ 6,784.55 $ 14,104.14 Other Contractural Services 2,714,133.64 135,706.68 117,930.01 17,776.67 Sprinkler System Repairs - - - - Landscape material 64,550.01 24,529.00 23,522.25 1,006.75 Permits - - - - Electrical - - 2,285.67 (2,285.67) Other Operating Supplies(Pavers) - - - - Other Road Materials - - 2,500.00 (2,500.00) Traffic Sign Restoration Project(50103) Traffic Signs 78,920.00 11,838.00 5,730.00 6,108.00 Lake Bank Project(51026) Swale & Slope Maintenance 192,775.72 115,665.43 100,822.99 14,842.44 Engineering Fees 500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 22,275.72 - - - Total Irrigation &Landscaping Expenditures $ 3,198,487.21 $ 308,627.80 $ 259,575.47 $ 49,052.33 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 10,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 5,377.40 $ 2,122.60 Property Appraiser Fees 6,600.00 4,950.00 4,867.45 82.55 Reserve for Contingencies - - - - Revenue Reserve 17,500.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 34,100.00 $ 12,450.00 $ 10,244.85 $ 2,205.15 Total Expenditures $ 3,232,587.21 $ 321,077.80 $ 269,820.32 $ 51,257.48 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 2,814,310.69 $2,863,994.89 $ 49,684.20 Page 1 of 1 F. February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 16 1 2 A lit 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 1 of 17 COLLIER COUNTY BID SCHEDULE SUMMARY COLLIER COUNTY CLAM PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING-2013 January 25,2013 BID SCHEDULE HUMISTON AND MOORE ENGINEERS FILE NO. 13-078 Estimated Unit Total Item Quantity Unit Cost Cost 1. Mobilization and demobilization 1 Job L.S. $ 2. Survey control and progress surveys 1 Job L.S. $ 3. Dredging of Sections A and B, 12,200 cy $ $ beach fill placement and grading 4. Turbidity monitoring 1 Job L.S. $ 5. Removal and reinstallation 3 each $ $ of informational signage(if necessary) 6. Removal of non-beach compatible material resulting from Sections A&B1 20 cy $ $ 7. Final grading&tilling 1 Job L.S. $ 8. Restoration of construction access and staging area 1 Job L.S $ 9. Payment and 1 Job L.S. $ Performance Bond Total Base Bid $ Bid Alternate 10. Mobilization and demobilization 1 Job L.S. $ 11. Dredging of Section C, Beach 8,100 cy $ $ fill placement and grading 12. Removal and reinstallation 1 each $ $ of informational signage(if necessary) 13. Survey control and progress surveys 1 Job L.S. $ 14. Removal of non-beach compatible material resulting from Section C2 20 cy $ $ 15. Final grading&tilling 1 Job L.S. $ Total Bid Alternate $ Total Base Bid Plus Alternate $ 1,2 From within the allowable dredge cut IT February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 161 2A 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 2 of 17 COLLIER COUNTY Technical Specifications COLLIER COUNTY CLAM PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING-2013 January 25,2013 BID SCHEDULE HUMISTON AND MOORE ENGINEERS FILE NO. 13-078 TS-1.0 Scope of WORK TS-2.0 Pre-construction Meeting and Submittals TS-3.0 Order of WORK TS-4.0 Layout of the WORK TS-5.0 Record Drawings TS-6.0 Site Conditions TS-7.0 Dredging TS-8.0 Beach Fill TS-9.0 Payment TS-10.0 General TS-11.0 Environmental Protection Technical Specification Page 1 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 1 I 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen CT am ass(Susa7f'17'BTieTi) Y P Y Page 3 of 17 TS-1.0 Scope of WORK TS-1.1 The WORK consists of furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing all tasks necessary for the maintenance dredging of approximately 20,000 cubic yards of sand from Clam Pass, and placement of sand fill along the shoreline to both the north and south of Clam Pass inlet as described herein. For the purpose of these technical specifications, OWNER shall mean Collier County, and ENGINEER shall mean Humiston and Moore Engineers or Turrell Hall and Associates, Inc. The material to be dredged is distributed among three areas as designated as Sections A, B, and C, on the plans. It is the intent of the County to, at a minimum, complete the dredging as specified for Sections A and B, because these are contiguous to the beach and are the shallowest areas and the easiest to access with mechanical excavation equipment, and past experience has shown that logistically Sections A and B can be excavated mechanically. Section C presents logistical difficulty to mechanical excavation that is somewhat different from the conditions in Sections A and B. Section C has greater water depths and distribution of the material to be dredged over a wider area. In the past Section C has always been dredged with a hydraulic dredge, with the material being pumped directly to the beach. This has been done during maintenance operations when all three sections, A, B, and C, were dredged hydraulically. For this reason, and because the most immediate need is to remove the material from Sections A and B, Section C has been added to the bid schedule as a bid alternate. This has been done to provide contractors, who may have the means of completing all three Sections, with an opportunity to provide the County with a price for completing all three Sections as part of this project. The amount of material to be dredged is summarized in the following Table TS-1 and shown in detail in the Construction Plans: Table TS-1 Clam Pass Dredge Quantities Dredge Channel Width Estimated Design Cut Estimated Design Cut Location at Design Volume in cubic yards Volume (cy)with a Depth (ft) (cy) 6-inch Overdepth Section A 45' 5,800 cy to-5.8 ft NAVD 6,200 cy to-6.3 ft NAVD Stations 0+00 (-4.5 NGVD) (-5.0 NGVD) thru 3+64.5 Section B Varies 5,400 cy to-5.3 ft NAVD 6,000 cy to-5.8 ft NAVD Stations 4+10 (-4.0 NGVD) (-4.5 NGVD) to 6+60 Section C Varies 6,600 cy to-4.8 ft NAVD 8,100 cy to-5.3 ft NAVD Stations 7+10 (-3.5 NGVD) (-4.0 NGVD) to 17+50 Note: OWNER has the right to reduce design elevations of the dredging during construction based on the material,which may affect the total dredge quantity. TS-1.2 This WORK must be completed according to the plans and these specifications within the time specified in the contract and within compliance with the conditions of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Corps of Engineers, and all local permits including permits from Collier County. Technical Specification Page 2 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 1 6 I 2 A (4 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 4 of 17 TS-1.3 The CONTRACTOR is solely responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, and procedures including construction layout and staking, and the sequence of the WORK, except as provided for in section TS-3.0, Order of WORK. TS-2.0 Pre-Construction Meeting and Submittals TS-2.1 Prior to commencement of construction, CONTRACTOR shall meet with ENGINEER and OWNER. CONTRACTOR's designated superintendent, as required under the General Terms and Conditions shall be present at the pre-construction meeting. TS-2.2 A minimum of three days prior to the pre-construction meeting, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to ENGINEER, for the OWNER's approval, an Operations Plan which shall describe in detail, as a minimum, the CONTRACTOR's proposed: 1. Order of WORK, 2. Anticipated schedule, including estimated start and completion dates, and anticipated daily production (i.e. cubic yards per day) 3. Vessels and heavy equipment to be used, 4. Water transportation for OWNER and ENGINEER if barge or other floating equipment is to be used, 5. Construction access to be used for equipment mobilization and demobilization, 6. Specific method of dredging and disposal of dredged material from the pass. Details will include staging of any equipment, procedures for removing the material from the approved dredge cut, method of material transport to the disposal area. 7. Number and qualifications of personnel to be used, 8. Specific methods to be used in establishing horizontal and vertical control and for staking out the WORK, 9. Subcontractors, including the registered PSM who will conduct progress and payment surveys, and the anticipated frequency of surveys. 10. A form to be used for reporting daily operations. This form shall include a place to record the number of personnel and equipment at the site, quantities of material dredged and placed on the beach disposal area during the reporting period, a description of the character of the material dredged, the locations dredged during the reporting period, number of truckloads of material hauled, the beach stations where material was placed during the reporting period, weather and sea conditions, the extent of and reason for any delays, visits from regulatory agencies, and any instructions received from the County or any County representative. If a hydraulic dredge is used for any part of the WORK, the daily reports of operation shall include the start and stop stations of both the dredge and the end of the discharge pipe. Turbidity measurements as required by the regulatory permits may be included on the daily reports of operation or may be submitted on a separate form. Reporting forms shall be provided to OWNER or ENGINEER by noon on the day following the day covered by the daily Report of Operations. 11. If a hydraulic dredge is to be used for any part of the WORK, in addition to the information listed under item 10 above, CONTRACTOR shall provide information on the size of the dredge, including horsepower on the main engine and the size of the intake and discharge pipelines, draft required by the dredge barge, minimum depth to which the dredge is capable of excavating, and the estimated daily production rates. Technical Specification Page 3 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 5 of 17 1 6 2A 11). Acceptance of the plan by the OWNER indicates an acknowledgement of receipt and a general understanding of the CONTRACTOR's proposed approach to the WORK; acceptance is not an endorsement of the CONTRACTOR's means and methods. TS-2.2 CONTRACTOR shall designate a competent superintendent to be on site who will be responsible for seeing that the WORK is in compliance with the contract documents. The superintendent shall supply the CONTRACTOR's contact information (i.e. mobile number and email) at which the CONTRACTOR may be reached at any time of day, and attend the preconstruction meeting. Once designated by the CONTRACTOR and accepted by the OWNER, the superintendent shall not be replaced on the job without prior notification to the OWNER and ENGINEER. TS-3.0 Order of WORK TS-3.1 The order of WORK shall generally be: excavation where called for in Sections A and B on the Construction Drawings. Section C representing a bid alternative shall be discussed separately as an ad-on, and if the CONTRACTOR chooses to provide a bid for Section C, the order of WORK for C will be discussed separately out of consideration for the logistics of completing Section C along with Sections A and B. For Sections A and B only, the order of WORK shall be placement and grading of approximately 4,000 cubic yards of sand in the old natural channel meander, then placement of the remainder of the material, estimated to be approximately 8,000 cubic yards of sand in the designated area on the beach south of the inlet. OWNER reserves the right to change the amounts of material placed to the south and to the north of the inlet. TS-3.2 The means and methods of excavation shall be determined by the CONTRACTOR. If dredging is to be done mechanically, this may require using some of the material to be graded for the purpose of constructing a temporary access sand road between stations approximately 2+00 and 6+10. Upon completion of the access road, CONTRACTOR shall begin at the eastern end excavating the material to be dredged down to grade, or as near to grade as possible so as to minimize removal of non-beach compatible material which may be encountered at lower elevations. The excavation shall proceed from east to west, with removal of the plug to connect the channel to the Gulf of Mexico being the last order of WORK, so that during the majority of the excavation, tidal currents will not interfere with the WORK or carry turbidity into interior portions of the bay or out the inlet. TS-4.0 Layout of the WORK TS-4.1 The CONTRACTOR shall complete layout (initial stake out) of WORK per the construction plans. The stake out shall include laying out the project by placing vertical stakes at every station as depicted on the construction plans, in alignment with the dredge footprint in order to present an outline of the bottom width of the dredge cut. The CONTRACTOR may elect to only stake out a portion of the job initially to reduce potential displacement or loss of stakes. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish such stakes, equipment, tools and qualified personnel as may be necessary for maintaining such staking for completion of the WORK. CONTRACTOR will be responsible for documenting the placement of all stakes placed on the beach through a graduated numbering of the stakes, and to use that list to ensure all stakes are removed and accounted for upon completion of the project. Technical Specification Page 4 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 6 of 17 161 2A TS-5.0 Record Drawings TS-5.1 During the course of construction, the CONTRACTOR shall record all information required to complete a set of Record As-Built Drawings. Information to be included on the Record Drawings shall be recorded on one working set of construction drawings during the course of the WORK, and shall include actual dredged channel dimensions and elevations, and beach fill dimensions and elevations. TS-5.2 The information recorded on the working set of construction drawings shall include a surveyed cross section for each station in the dredge cut. These cross sections shall be surveyed by a PSM registered in the State of Florida, in the presence of the ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR shall notify ENGINEER 24 hours in advance of conducting progress surveys. The information recorded on the working set of construction drawings shall also include a profile for each completed station on the beach fill which is shown on the plans. CONTRACTOR shall also provide ENGINEER with survey data in x, y, z format, and a copy of all survey notes. TS-5.3 If field changes are made to modify the WORK in any way, such field changes shall be documented on the Record Drawings by dimension, detail, and date and also noted on the daily report form by the CONTRACTOR. The working set of construction drawings shall be kept at the site and be available for review by OWNER and ENGINEER at all times during the progress of the WORK. Prior to Substantial Completion of the WORK, the CONTRACTOR shall transfer the information to a final Project Record set of reproducible drawings, and submit the working construction and Project Record drawings to the OWNER through the ENGINEER, along with a certification as to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. Prior to final payment, the Record Drawings shall be revised by the CONTRACTOR to reflect any changes which have occurred since the submittal for Substantial Completion. TS-6.0 Site Conditions TS-6.1 The construction site is in the entrance to Clam Pass, and in the immediate interior waterway to approximately 1800 feet inside the eastern end of the pass, when including the bid alternate for Section C. For Sections A and B alone, the eastern limit of the WORK is approximately 700 feet from the entrance to the inlet at the Gulf of Mexico. The entrance to the pass is in the nearshore environment of the Gulf of Mexico. The site is therefore exposed to weather conditions which at times may include storms and rough sea conditions necessitating temporary suspension of marine construction operations. Additionally, Clam Pass is a tidal inlet, and is subject to strong tidal currents. The CONTRACTOR is responsible for being familiar with these conditions and to take them under consideration in the cost of the WORK. TS-6.2 The CONTRACTOR is responsible to take appropriate precautions to insure that partially completed WORK is not subject to displacement or damage due to natural site and storm conditions. Should any such damage or displacement of partially completed WORK occur, the CONTRACTOR is responsible for repairing any such damage or displacement of partially completed WORK at no additional cost to the OWNER. The CONTRACTOR is encouraged to perform progress surveys to document completed WORK, and the survey must be completed by a professional surveyor as described in TS-5.2. Should there be any changed site conditions due to storm effects, the CONTRACTOR's progress surveys along with any data collected by the ENGINEER, including photographs, will be the basis for documenting the nature and magnitude of any such changes. Technical Specification Page 5 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 7 of 17 161 1 2A TS-6.3 Information and data furnished or referred to herein are for the CONTRACTOR's information, however it is expressly understood that the OWNER and ENGINEER shall not be responsible for any interpretation or conclusion drawn therefrom by the CONTRACTOR. It is the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to be familiar with local conditions that may in any manner affect performance of the WORK. TS-7.0 Dredging TS-7.1 The WORK covered by this section consists of furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment and performing all tasks necessary for the excavation and transport of the excavated material from the designated area to be dredged to the designated beach fill area. TS-7.2 The maximum depth of dredging is -5.8 feet NAVD in Area A at the entrance channel and -5.3 feet NAVD in Area B and -4.8 NAVD in Area C. Due to inaccuracies inherent in dredging and underwater excavation, overdepth of one half foot shall be used in determining pay quantities and acceptance of the WORK. No payment shall be made for any material excavated from below the overdepth elevation. Any over dredging beyond what is shown in the plans or these specifications that results in a permit violation will be the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to correct at no expense to the OWNER. CONTRACTOR shall be required to excavate down to within one half foot of the depth specified on the plans, except as provided for under section TS-7.3 below, and material excavated from below the overdepth specified on the plans shall not be included in the pay quantity. Additionally, CONTRACTOR is encourage to not excavate below the maximum depth designated as the overdepth as shown herein and on the Construction Drawings, due to regulatory constraints as well as to minimize potential for excavating non-beach compatible material. TS-7.3 If material other than beach quality sand is encountered above the specified depths, CONTRACTOR shall immediately notify the OWNER and the ENGINEER and reduce the dredging depth and positioning, in the immediate vicinity where unsuitable material was encountered, to avoid dredging material that is unsuitable for beach disposal. Should any material unsuitable for beach disposal be excavated, CONTRACTOR shall separate such material from the beach compatible material to the maximum extent practical and dispose of the non-compatible material as directed by the OWNER. TS-7.4 The CONTRACTOR shall erect such barricades, fences and signs around the construction area as necessary to prevent public access to the construction area. CONTRACTOR shall also be responsible to post appropriate warnings within and around the construction area to prevent pedestrians, boaters, and swimmers from entering the area affected by the construction project. It is the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to insure that the construction project area is sufficiently posted and monitored to prevent swimmers, boaters and pedestrians from injury from the construction. TS-7.5 The CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for all informational signage markers in the waterway that may be removed, destroyed or otherwise displaced during the project as a result of construction. The informational signage markers shall be restored by the CONTRACTOR at locations approved by the OWNER or ENGINEER. TS-8.0 Beach Disposal TS-8.1 The WORK covered by this section consists of furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment and performing all tasks necessary for the placement of sand on the beach fill area within the lines and grades shown on the Construction Plans. Technical Specification Page 6 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 8 of 17 161 2 A t TS-8.2 Beach disposal may be conducted at night as necessary to avoid interference with the use of park facilities by park visitors during park normal operation hours as described in Section TS-3.0, Order of WORK. TS-8.3 The CONTRACTOR shall establish lines and grades for the beach fill phase of the WORK. The tolerances in the beach fill grade are plus or minus one half foot on all grades above 0 NGVD. CONTRACTOR will be responsible for the removal of all stakes prior to completion of the project. Upon completion of all filling operations, the fill shall be graded and dressed so as to eliminate any undrained pockets and abrupt humps and depressions. TS-8.4 After the beach has been graded to project specifications, the CONTRACTOR shall perform the following WORK if sand compaction measurements are incompatible with turtle nesting behavior determined by an authorized representative of the ENGINEER immediately upon completion of the required WORK. The CONTRACTOR shall till the WORK area with equipment operated so as to penetrate and loosen beach sand (a) to a depth of 36 inches and (b) laterally without leaving unloosened compact sand between the adjacent paths of tines or penetrating part of the equipment. Upon completion of any tilling, the beach shall be dragged to smooth the surface and remove any ruts created by the tilling process. TS-8.5 Placement of beach fill material shall not encroach beyond the continuous vegetation line where such a line exists. TS-9.0 Payment TS-9.1 Payment will be based upon quantities of material dredged out of the design channel lines and grades as specified on the construction plans, including overdepth, as documented by the CONTRACTOR's progress surveys, conducted by a PSM registered in the State of Florida. TS-9.2 Notwithstanding required production rates, the CONTRACTOR will need to achieve completion of the WORK within the specified time, and with an understanding that full production may not be achieved at the outset of construction, CONTRACTOR shall be eligible for 60% payment of mobilization/demobilization upon demonstrating the capability of excavating a minimum of 100 cubic yards of sand and placement of that sand in the designated fill area within a 24 hour period. Payment for the remaining 40% of the mobilization/demobilization shall be eligible upon determination of final completion and acceptance of the completed WORK by OWNER. TS-9.3 Pay quantities will be computed based upon comparison of the January 2013 survey shown on the construction plans, and progress surveys to be conducted by CONTRATOR's surveyor in accordance with paragraph TS-5.2, provided that ENGINEER determines that the CONTRACTOR's surveys are adequate for determining pay quantities. If the ENGINEER determines that additional surveys are needed to determine or verify pay quantities, additional surveys may be conducted by the CONTRACTOR with ENGINEER present, or independent surveys may be conducted at the discretion of the OWNER. TS-9.4 The CONTRACTOR shall perform and provide his own volume calculations for determination of material dredged, as required for payment purposes, at the time of each pay request, if applicable. The volumes shall be determined through comparison of surveys. The CONTRACTOR shall be paid on the unit price basis and the cubic yards excavated based on progress surveys. TS-9.5 Material which is not deemed beach compatible which was dredged and separated from the beach compatible material and stockpiled for disposal off of the beach will be measured by the surveyor before removing from the beach. That CONTRACTOR will provide the ENGINEER Technical Specification Page 7 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 9 of 17 161 2A \ik and OWNER with an estimated quantity of the non-beach compatible material based on the survey data also to be provided to the ENGIEER and OWNER. OWNER reserves the right to have ENGINEER make an independent estimate of such quantities. TS-10.0 General TS-10.1 Location of Storage Facilities The WORK is to be completed on the beach and in the nearshore area around Clam Pass including the staging area designated on plans. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for restoring these areas to their pre-project condition, including native vegetation, before the project will be considered to be substantially complete. If additional storage is required for construction equipment and materials, arrangements for such storage facilities shall be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR. If the beach area in the immediate vicinity of the inlet that is disturbed by normal construction activities proves to be sufficient for all of the CONTRACTOR's staging and stockpiling needs, without unnecessarily disturbing vegetation in the staging area as designated on the plans, the CONTRACTOR may use the beach area in the immediate vicinity of the inlet to fulfill staging and stockpiling needs, at the approval of the OWNER, and provided that this does not violate any conditions of the regulatory permits, and provided the beach staging area so designated is thoroughly marked by the CONTRACTOR with warning tape, staking, and signage to keep pedestrian traffic out of the staging, stockpiling, and storage area. Any area used for staging will need to be graded and dressed so as to eliminate any undrained pockets and abrupt humps and depressions. TS-10.2 Spillage Special measures shall be taken to prevent bilge pumpage or effluent, chemicals, fuels, oils, greases, and bituminous materials from entering the water. TS-10.3 Disposal Disposal of any materials, wastes, effluent, trash, garbage, oil, grease, chemicals, etc., in and adjacent to the project site shall not be permitted. If any waste materials are dumped in unauthorized areas, the CONTRACTOR shall remove the material and restore the area to the original condition that existed before the area was disturbed. If necessary, contaminated ground shall be excavated, disposed of as directed by the OWNER through the ENGINEER, and replaced with suitable fill material. Any restoration measures required under this section of the Specifications will be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR, and shall not result in any additional expense to the OWNER. TS-11.0 Environmental Protection TS-11.1 CONTRACTOR shall exercise due caution so as not to damage existing native vegetation along the shoreline within and around the project sites, access ways, and staging areas. Any native vegetation damaged by CONTRACTOR during the course of the WORK shall be restored by CONTRACTOR at CONTRACTOR's expense. TS-11.2 CONTRACTOR shall perform all WORK in accordance with all county, state and federal permits issued for this WORK. Technical Specification Page 8 of 8 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 10 of 17 16j � � i 2 A rV't/' CONSTRUCTION BID BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Emergency Dredging of Clam Pass BID NO. 13-6054 Full Name of Bidder Main Business Address Place of Business Telephone No. Fax No. State Contractor's License # State of Florida Certificate of Authority Document Number Federal Tax Identification Number DUNS # CCR# Cage Code To: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (hereinafter called the Owner) The undersigned, as Bidder declares that the only person or parties interested in this Bid as principals are those named herein, that this Bid is submitted without collusion with any other person, firm or corporation; that it has carefully examined the location of the proposed Work, the proposed form of Agreement and all other Contract Documents and Bonds, and the Contract Drawings and Specifications. Bidder proposes, and agrees if this Bid is accepted, Bidder will execute the Agreement included in the Bidding Documents, to provide all necessary machinery, tools, apparatus and other means of construction, including utility and transportation services necessary to do all the Work, and furnish all the materials and equipment specified or referred to in the Contract Documents in the manner and time herein prescribed and according to the requirements of the Owner as therein set forth, furnish the Contractor's Bonds and Insurance specified in the General Conditions of the Contract, and to do all other things required of the Contractor by the Contract Documents, and that it will take full payment the sums set forth in the following Bid Schedule: Unit prices shall be provided in no more than two decimal points, and in the case where further decimal points are inadvertently provided, rounding to two decimal points will be conducted by Purchasing staff. NOTE: If you choose to bid, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your bid pages. February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 11 of 17 161 2 A ' LC). MODIFICATIONS PER PRE-BID • BIDS ARE DUE FEB 8, 2013 @ 2:30PM • See attached Bid Schedule • Surveying Firms Agnoli Barber& Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail N #200, Naples, FL 34108 Phone:(239) 597-3111 Dagostino &Wood Address: 610 18th Ave NE, Naples, FL 34120 Phone:(239) 352-6085 Marco Island Surveyors 950 NORTH COLLIER BLVD.SUITE 412 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 239-389-0026 • Parking: The successful contractor will need to coordinate parking and access with the Parks & Recreation Department Attn: Jake Sullivan 239.252-4000. The Parks Department will provide some onsite parking to the successful contractor. • Humiston & Moore will perform Turbidity Monitoring per their existing contract February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 12 of 17 161 2A I LIST OF MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS THIS LIST MUST BE COMPLETED OR BID MAY BE DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE The undersigned states that the following is a list of the proposed subcontractors for the major categories outlined in the requirements of the Bid specifications. The undersigned acknowledges its responsibility for ensuring that the Subcontractors for the major categories listed herein are "qualified" (as defined in Ordinance 87-25 and Section 15 of Instructions to Bidders) and meet all legal requirements applicable to and necessitated by the Contract Documents, including, but not limited to proper licenses, certifications, registrations and insurance coverage. The Owner reserves the right to disqualify any Bidder who includes non-compliant or non-qualified Subcontractors in its bid offer. Further, the Owner may direct the Successful Bidder to remove/replace any Subcontractor, at no additional cost to Owner, which is found to be non-compliant with this requirement either before or after the issuance of the Award of Contract by Owner. (Attach additional sheets as needed). Further, the undersigned acknowledges and agrees that promptly after the Award of Contract, and in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents, the Successful Bidder shall identify all Subcontractors it intends to use on the Project. The undersigned further agrees that all Subcontractors subsequently identified for any portion of work on this Project must be qualified as noted above. Major Category of Work Subcontractor and Address 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Company: Signature: Date: February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 13 of 17 161 1((i STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE OF BIDDER The Bidder is required to state below what work of similar magnitude completed within the last five years is a judge of its experience, skill and business standing and of its ability to conduct the work as completely and as rapidly as required under the terms of the Agreement. Project and Location Reference 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Company: Signature: Date: February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to rpenam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 14 of 17 1 2 I'1 A 1f' TRENCH SAFETY ACT Bidder acknowledges that included in the various items of the bid and in the Total Bid Price are costs for complying with the Florida Trench Safety Act (90-96, Laws of Florida) effective October 1, 1990. The Bidder further identifies the cost to be summarized below: Trench Safety Units of Unit Unit Extended Measure Measure (Quantity) Cost Cost (Description) (LF,SY) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TOTAL $ Failure to complete the above may result in the Bid being declared non-responsive. Company: Signature: Date: . . . . . . + . . • 1 6 1 2 A lit k Co- b co / - o_ G c 69 CL % CV o N- \ \ ' o $ 0 mm & } < < cf \ \ \ /7 2 \ // < o 2 j \ j \/ • ° \ �/ oI c7 1 ,,, — m= \ && 1- = 2 ) G R3 = 5 < km A [ a) a)f� f\ § c� ] k � � f� _ �/ \ \ j / u) tc 0 14 4 \ \ { k ] ƒ] ƒ77 \ / U) 2 \ Q EE - - kE = 3 S e e , o CD 0) mC cE « IE �� 0 § m � � 3 ° $ _ § E ° co ma oow a5, � ƒ ® ® # ] f\ � 5k } �/ � # � � _ I / G \ \ k E E g c 6 3 ° f f ® � E ) _ § \ � AA \ \ , § \ > § . % mcosem m � � � � tkk00 - 00)0 u) 2222EEa $ 2Ec 2 0 , 2 2 m e c e 2 a) * c = m = _ CC CC ECG c ± e jk tlLOOOOO .E _ Co \ - .-ooco - -_ csi J ƒ � � n « < c & = o / z 161 0 2A1 * N co co CO u) W W > i ° O O. 0 ° 0d w W p g O O ° p O 8 O 8 .O. D. O O.. ,U Y 1;. O O ° O O ° r 8 co N W v co 0 ) o N co m o O W ,p ° ° CO. ° in ° (NJ to at - r >- >- ).- Z p "a .c •0 O M N (n r 0r0: 2 4. W U fA #? 4 o O Z ci c C O ° ° O 0080000 O '.. 0 o o a 0 0 o j } } }r ° ° O ° ° ° ° an ° °o 0 o p 1n 0 o ° o a)a W ,- Z - _ O M .M O _ a) V W _ �E9 EA E9 49 69 d (ham `°a = O O ° OI O O p 0 0 0 0 O O ° O O0 ° O L O 6 "O uf ° Iry W W co co co W co• D` Q) O a) O co O O O n' 0°0 O O. W W W W W W W `m CO LO <° Z v_ (n ,ri °° ui ui u? e, r r r } Y mu V bN4 69 u> 419 i»co 0 0 >>d 3 > ° ° O o U Co C o a 1n ° O 'a 'a•N : O O q •PJ W co W W W W W C aW O O m N- alm .- } } } } }O. (! N W O M Z 0.1 � Z Z 4 Q S N EA 0)) Efl EA E3 N r CD = EA tr 4/1 EA U g E a " O O M a W O .,w iO ° ° .o ° ° 0 ° O ° o ��,-m d `m `a (°n co c°o_ 00 °° ° (°n 0O m LU M aa) aa)) aa)) a) a)aa)) aa)) 0)) m o 0 ''-< co N N O o0 LCn O h N �. } )- } } } } } m et ro (0 Gr.0 Q) v v M Z N ° M ,-1 a0 () i. 2 U w 0 iii EA EA EA E9 69 tN/! NEA E9 (°Fe aa 0 co C" m C 6 0, 00 O 0 0 0 O LL �T wy O 0_, 0_, a O 0 0 l0 a a 4,5 W W W W W W W Q U G C - O O N (° t, O O N M. m m 0.) W W W W W W W 0 W O^ , N 0101 z O 'Dv) r Co C Z Z a )- >- >- } } } >- 21 V N .-1 N N E/} V t+'1 N. N t/! FA w X Lo O co of ,4 o o >- } e } o o : >- } a W W U U W U W W U U O Z w O O ° m C •- ° O M O — 0 0 N N (0 w o o U O N cc0) E m o U L ) al x o f6 a _ m rn rn rn co) C j o E c c w = Eo a w"O "O "C3 7) m CO2 Z ,,,•- p N (4 c a) N U -o W >-W s ) E c E c K W E W C c 7, d °'6C V N U p -p o .. .. W m U U C E N Z o W W CO 0 Q a al N W n. d o o C E W Q C c O L 8 } � N Wrn a ) co o W E >_N S 65 y N U a 2 W .0 C f p'a CO CC m N W W >Z ... O_ Q Q C (W co 17:0 C W 0 O p N C 0 W W ) N a y Q N(°.?„. m O O C @a a) m 06 C C wQ }Z Q C C C >` Q Ufn T Z CO U N a Z CO o) O p O O W CO C C O a) U O (0 = w W N O c W y N o 4( 2C(n c } O m N pc' ,O O > > C N W > Net pa) . N N- N a a 0 0 0 2 p a) O U a C W 20 o m aa)) coai c aa)) 92 aa)i p mti V a2io > E WS r) 2 ,E ! V) ca O ce Q u) ii - O ce H 2 J co H J LJ O W W W L Ei m CO a d a m E .- N Co v (C) (C) 1- co °) ° 0 2 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7bi.Clam Bay Subcommittee Report-Review of construction bids received by County to reopen Clam Pass(Susan O'Brien) Page 17 of 17 161 2A Original Message From: Neil Dorrill [mailto:Neil cr dmgfl.com] Sent: Tuesday,February 12, 2013 3:40 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: FW: Clam Pass Emergency Dredging... Bid Tabulation Results? Original Message From: Ken Humiston [mailto:kh( humistonandmoore.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12,2013 2:53 PM To: Neil Dorrill Subject: RE: Clam Pass Emergency Dredging... Bid Tabulation Results? Neil Upon review of the bid summary for Clam Pass,the lowest responsive bidders for Clam Pass appear to be Kyle Construction, Inc for Sections A and B,and Crowder Gulf for Section C. However, it is not clear if Crowder's bid for items 1 and 2,the Mobilization/Demobilization, and surveying, which are included in the first part of the bid, would apply, perhaps on a prorated basis, for Section C. If that is the case, it would seem to make sense to award A and B to Kyle,and C to Crowder. Ken February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ci. Landscape Water Management Subcommittee-Water collection basins post-construction monitoring requirements(Dave Trecker) Page 1 of 1 161 2A Ilk Original Message From: Jim Carr[mailto:carr @abbinc.com] Sent:Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9:38 AM To: ResnickLisa Subject: RE: On behalf of Mr.Neil Dorrill,Two Requests Lisa, Regarding Question# 1,yes Dr. Trecker's comments are accurate. The South Florida Water Management District Permits typically include conditions that reserve the right to require additional water quality treatment if necessary, but there is no standard for long term monitoring of the man-made lakes. Water Quality is typically monitored at the point source where the project(man-made lakes)discharges into the receiving waters. Jim Carr, P.E. Agnoli, Barber&Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 239.597.3111 ext. 215 239.566.2203 fax Original Message From: david trecker [mailto:djtrecker(a,yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday,January 23,2013 11:22 AM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Water Management Lisa- Please pass this on to the PBSD directors,Neil and Kyle as a one-way communication. I just spoke with Jennifer Hecker of the Conservancy. Jennifer is an expert on regulations and standards. She said man-made lakes,water-collection basins used to control run-off, are not regulated. They have no standards for nutrients,copper, bacteria,etc. She said the Water Management District signs off on man-made lakes once construction is completed, but there are no monitoring or reporting requirements subsequently. Of course, pollution problems from man-made lakes can affect downstream waters that are regulated, e.g.,Clam Bay. So the pollution should be addressed at its source,as we're proposing to do. Dave February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 1 of 8 161 2 \q) TO: PBSD Directors, Neil Dorrill and Kyle Lukasz FROM: Dave Trecker for the Landscape & Water Management Subcommittee SUBJECT: Community Awareness Program on Fertilizer Usage DATE: February 7, 2013 The PBSD has begun to address community-wide fertilizer usage, leading to copper fungicide treatment of the freshwater lakes and, in turn, some copper buildup in Clam Bay and very significant copper buildup in the lakes. A community awareness program on the problems, stressing best-management practices on fertilizer use, was proposed. To that end, the attached drafts for a simple brochure and for a Powerpoint presentation are offered for review and revisions. The intent of the awareness program is to drive home the problems to residents via articles in the PB Post and presentations to community organizations and condo associations. This would be the first step in what would likely be a long-range program to deal with both fertilizer misuse and copper buildup. The staged approaches might entail the following. I. Misuse of fertilizers Stage 1 — Community awareness (now) Stage 2 - Foundation enforcement based on new policy or amended covenants (longer term) II. Copper buildup Stage 1 - Pilot programs on non-copper fungicide treatments (Kyle Lukasz proposal for Basin 3 lakes) Stage 2 - If successful, expansion to other lakes. Stage 3 - Removal of accumulated copper (long-term possibility) Please review the attached drafts and pass on any suggested revisions to Lisa. I would like to hammer out final drafts at the Feb. 26 sub-committee meeting. February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 2 of 8 161 2 Aid BROCHURE DRAFT Pelican Bay is facing a severe problem. Its waterways — inland lakes and Clam Bay— are being polluted by high levels of fertilizer runoff. Nutrients from the runoff— dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus —cause algae bloom, a threat to aquatic plants and wildlife. To deal with algae buildup, a copper fungicide has been applied over an extended period of time. Through accumulation, copper— itself a pollutant— has reached alarmingly high levels in our freshwater lakes. Those lakes are not subject to federal or state regulation. But pollution— leading to unsightly sludge, odor and dead wildlife— affects quality of life and property values of people who live nearby. And Clam Bay, downstream of the lakes, is highly regulated and has strict limits on pollution. The maximal acceptable level for dissolved copper is 3.7 micrograms per liter. Current levels in Inner and Outer Clam Bay are 7.7 and 9.0, respectively, marginally out of compliance. But dissolved copper in the 44 lakes that feed Clam Bay ranges from 12 to 3870 micrograms per liter, with an average close to 350. Continuing copper buildup will lead to further migration to Clam Bay and eventually a major pollution problem. Several approaches are being taken to deal with this problem. (1) The Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) is exploring alternatives to copper sulfate as a means of controlling algae. The use of selective bacteria in combination with aeration and littoral plantings will be tested in Basin 3, the central section of the freshwater lakes. If this pilot program is successful, it will be expanded to other basins. (2) To deal with fertilizer misuse, the heart of the problem, the PBSD is undertaking a community awareness program— a follow-on to a recent county ordinance (11-24) which mandates that Best Management Practices (BMP) be followed throughout Collier County. February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 3 of 8 161 2Aft Dealing with this problem is everyone's responsibility. If we are to have clean groundwater and healthy waterways in Pelican Bay, it is essential that fertilizers be used in accordance with BMP. Here is a specific list of things every condominium association, homeowner association and individual homeowner can and should do. • Use only landscape maintenance companies whose technicians are trained and licensed in BMP. During the course of fertilizer application, be sure there is appropriate on-site supervision. • Use fertilizer application rates recommended by the Florida-Friendly Best Management Practices for Protection of Water Resources by the Green Industries. Those can be accessed at http:/fyn.ifas.ufl.edu/professionals/GI-BMP_publications.htm. • Limit nitrogen usage to 4-6 lbs./1000 sq. ft./yr. • Whenever possible, use slow-release fertilizer. • Do not fertilize during the rainy season (June 1 - September 30) or prior to forecasted storms • Be sure no fertilizer is used within 10 feet of groundwater, including lakes, except to establish new landscape and then for no more than 30 days after planting. • When installing new landscape, use drought-resistant plants that require minimal fertilization. • Be mindful that reclaimed water used for irrigation already contains most of the nitrogen and phosphorus needed for grass fertilization. Little or no additional fertilizer may be needed. The Pelican Bay Services Division, working in concert with the Pelican Bay Foundation, urges all residents of Pelican Bay to follow these guidelines. The health of our lakes and our estuary depends upon it. February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 4 of 8 161 2 POWERPOINT DRAP 1 Slide 1 ... against a backdrop photo of a neighborhood lake POLLUTION IN PELICAN BAY Slide 2 WATERWAY SYSTEM Part of the South Florida Water Management District • 44 freshwater lakes —retention ponds to control runoff • Troughs to canal along berm, with culverts leading to Clam Bay • Clam Bay —Outer,Inner and Upper Clam Bay and connecting channels Slide 3 Map of Pelican Bay showing waterways Slide 4 Photo of neighborhood lake Slide 5 Photo of berm canal Slide 6 Photo of Clam Bay February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 5 of 8 161 2A ' Slide 7 Lakes Canal along berm Clam Bay Slide 8 WATER QUALITY MONITORING - Dissolved oxygen -Total dissolved solids - Dissolved nitrogen - Dissolved phosphorus - Chlorophyll A - Dissolved copper (fungicide) Slide 9 STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS • Man-made Lakes SFWMD approval after construction No regulation thereafter • Clam Bay U.S. EPA standards Florida DEP standards February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 6 of 8 1 6 1 2A t Slide 10 CLAM BAY WATER QUALITY Standard Actual Dissolved oxygen 5 mg/L 5.1 ** Nitrogen 0.81 mg/L* 0.07 ** Phosphorus 0.06 mg/L* 0.065 ** Copper 3.71.Ug/L 7.7 Inner Clam Bay 9.0 Outer Clam Bay * Midpoint of allowed range ** Average in 1-2Q/12 Slide 11 SERIOUS FUTURE PROBLEMS High fertilizer usage (nitrogen and phosphorus) 1 Nutrient runoff to lakes and Clam Bay Algae bloom from excess nutrients - Reduced dissolved oxygen - Odor and sludge build-up - Fish and bird kill Copper fungicide build-up from algae treatment February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 7 of 8 161 2 A 1(;) Slide 12 Fertilizer Runoff 4. Lake and Bay Pollution Algae Bloom o. Lake and Bay Pollution Copper Fungicide Slide 13 CURRENT WATER QUALITY* Lakes Clam Bay Dissolved oxygen 4.9 mg/L 5.1 Nitrogen (nitrites/nitrates) 0.11 mg/L 0.07 Phosphorus (phosphates) 0.11 mg/L 0.07 Copper 350,ctg/L 6 *Average of test data in 1-2Q/12 Slide 14 HOW DO WE DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM? Dual-Path Approach (1) Replace copper fungicide - Bacteria+ aeration + littoral plantings piloted in Basin 3 (2) Reduce fertilizer usage - Community awareness of problem - Best Management Practices as mandated by county ordinance February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7ciii.Landscape Water Management Report-Community Outreach regarding importance of BMP recommendation(Dave Trecker) Page 8 of 8 161 2A 1(1) Slide 15 WHAT CAN YOU DO? (1) Use BMP-licensed landscape maintenance companies (2) Use fertilizer rates recommended by "Florida-Friendly BMP for Protection of Water Resources" (3) Limit nitrogen application to 4-6 lbs. per 1000 sq. ft. per year Slide 16 WHAT CAN YOU DO? (4) Do not fertilize between June 1 and September 30 or prior to forecasted storms (5) Apply no fertilizer within 10 feet of groundwater, including lakes (6) Use drought-resistant plants that require minimal fertilization Slide 17 HERE'S A TIP Reclaimed water used for irrigation already contains most of the nitrogen and phosphorus needed for grass fertilization! Slide 18 SOLUTION TO POLLUTION? Proper use of fertilizer! It's everyone's responsibility! February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7d.Pathways/Tree Canopy Subcommittee Report- Ian Orlikoff,Certified Arborist,Initial Analysis of Pelican Bay Boulevard(from Commons to North Tram) Page 1 of 17 1 6 1 2A � Signature Tree Care,>�.0 1(1/ ‘,„„ _ 481 10th Avenue N.E. • Naples, Florida 34120 Office: (239) 348-1330 • Fax: (239) 348-3133 Email: info @signaturetreecare.com = IAN ORLIKOFF • ISA Certified Arborist #FL-1037A Florida Certified Horticulture Professional #H605655 January 17,2013 Attention:Mr.Keith Dallas Re:Arborist Consultation for Pelican Bay Services Division, Pelican Bay Blvd. Pathway Project from Westside-Commons to North Tram Station I conducted a driving patrol street survey of the trees along the West side of Pelican Bay Boulevard for the proposed pathway project from the West Commons to the North Tram Station. This is not a hazard evaluation. However,certain obvious hazards were noted and recommended as candidates for removal rather than employ pathway mitigation to solve conflicts. No below ground investigation was performed at this time to determine what, if any,roots were impacted from previous pathway installation. Options to Root Cutting: 1.Curve pathway:curve far enough away from trunk for a stable root zone to remain intact.This may require cooperation with individual or multiple properties if they are open to preserving the present • tree canopy.This is the highest standard for community involvement. 2. Flexible permeable pavement:allows roots to remain in place while providing a quality soft impact, permeable surface for pedestrians and bicyclists.There are a few products on the market that are similar in comparison. 3. Bridging:a structure that is built over roots for pedestrian and bike access.This option is not recommended in this particular section of the proposed project. 4. Removal of tree:due to poor structure,defects, lean,and/or pathway conflict. Arborist Consultation for Pelican Bay Services Division,Pelican Bay Blvd.Pathway Project from Westside-Commons to North Tram Station Jan. 17,2013 Page 1 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7d.Pathways/Tree Canopy Subcommittee Report- Ian Orlikoff,Certified Arborist,Initial Analysis of Pelican Bay Boulevard(from Commons to North Tram) Page 2 of 17 1 6 I T 1 2 A 11 Signature Tree Care,ac 481 10th Avenue N.E. « Naples, Florida 34120 Office: (239) 348-1330 « Fax: (239) 348-3133 Email: info@signaturetreecare.com IAN ORLIKOFF 1SA Certified Arborist #1-L-1037A Florida Certified Horticulture Professional#H605 65.5 Root barriers were omitted in my recommendations because existing trees in these stages of development and maturity are not appropriate candidates for root barriers in such close proximity. Root barriers will in most cases protect the pathway,but will create a host of problems and liabilities. Large tree roots would need to be cut to install the systems and developing root systems would be impeded from providing stability. Future plantings may receive root barriers if sufficient soil volume is provided for development of a stable root system for mature tree size. The situation being dealt with at this time was shaped by a lack of understanding regarding the impacts of tree roots and structural conflicts in the past. It is my professional recommendation that the existing plan be further developed to incorporate sufficient spaces for future tree plantings in areas where this flexibility exists.This will ensure that as trees fail,decline or need to be installed,transplanted or replaced,that there be sufficient area to do so without the limitations that exist today. History should not repeat itself.The scope of a newly developed plan would be decided upon and based on long term goals. Site prep specifications should be provided by an experienced and qualified ISA Certified Arborist so as not to encourage root/structural conflicts or potential for tree failure. The installation contractor should understand the reasoning behind the specifications,site selection,and have knowledge of proper installation methodology.Contractor should be held accountable for any deviation from specifications without approval from controlling authority or agent. • All too often specifications are not followed during a project which creates future complications. Monitoring of all work should be completed by the controlling authority ensuring that the installation contractor is employing the detailed specifications. Please advise if there are any queries on topics which I have distinguished in this consultation report. Best Regards, Ian Orliko :7" — ----------------------------- — - —Arborist Consultation for Pelican Bay Services Division,Pelican Bay Blvd. Pathway Project from Westside-Commons to North Tram Station Jan. 17,2013 Page 2 .. =c v.rzinl d2lfi LbNS 161 ; 2A + -, , 4 ,,,......„ 11111 �. � } 11111111111 a, .1. o "5 0 i _ . , gmmglig i i '-‘ , ...,-;., .:,-4 ., . e ',3 -12 M I . .. ;,. .. gggzg4 ,to. 9, . , , ,, , >, -, 11 z. ri gl000lUUUUUo6 F, � , 1 T 7 O a +,a 4 4 tirlB 1 . W ,./. ,� k�: i I!s, . .„ . (/)C.) - \ r �d In ((11 % {e; 0 0 w At w" n ` :T it t E--.2 c P4 rn Q .r4 0 4, d pH D a� IrT1 11 rip J VJ J rt O n � i _„it .., Sfi-; A... h ', �!( .%k•.` N d i �1 I A A"�j O �R '' 07,6 'rA�: -fir.'. I1 I•i,E ,,�o ° i II rig ' --�•1, N' �r,,k ,"!!!'.�;; ' '3_ . : °.� .A 03 0 - uf�p` � � r,: 13:;‘ ,,‘,,,, ,, ,--: -, ,,,:s�0 z w¢ _e.: i .-', ,T ma 01 UNo� A\A �71 �� w v= L o° •U �—�—�!o ff c.) U w a a.o>8 wp �..- --/ is =ate PO (n ,-a Lird W G U / 1 • Cn Q L II ! g } % O s ►,�_ E E e e V ; a 5x z .x, 1 : t 3 Y a P , ttgg x.. 5 Y. i `s i 3 6 r gl wCS xg € 1 I ( 1 T: . Y. e ' I I i •. a AR- ran i s o , „ •-1 \_ d;iUidJIi!JiJtL I :I ZIitil. SI 2A. cs., 1 vV 1 ea F-- 4 I soul td'SH IdYAl SHd 01,t Iv 1a� , N I • I ik.3 r- 1/111111 xYidMFt'iY/BLIS�LSYN[ 1 t09 91IfFS$AI4Ia]IYO�Il1VT It18 _ 1 4 y l .. Z---- xozsrnrasa�rn�as ` i I l— =p AVH xVJPIId AVM13LYd auvna�noeava NYwm_d t e n # "• + W si.AO ie ghhi ° �� ;. Do y SIR Y., s� 1!. 1 F - 2 .-., ti, pf d *4$'�# r $ r 7..., , k " f .f , t 4 .11,1 . ,II m tT`"b jyse h t 4k•' k9 1 °l • -i■ !�Y 1l�,„F J.O r3 ,} 4,. t'' . '' + `, ,., ? 1' • .44... f I�l�1 I• f l� 1 •�•vii y '''''.*7 .:'''‘" A.,1'44t5( ..e. Qc. I ■ ■4 ',..i?" ti 'ma;V, 11 4 . ° Q ,as4 rt' �"w 1�' r n Y y+R w� n, i, •Iit 1/ t i fn N 1 it s >,! • •II ca CL ;� ,..„,,e,' w s r i el,--a.4- i '."' t� 1 I 11 • • 6 if i I �, rk ,..� � ;; f j • i r' ax�� Y �, f 1�� .. a x . x".y' }�' i T , • l i Ii .c a -.l 3S,' „.„..,n' G_ 1 iI lg1��,`,^ 1 {'4 `�..., fya f � �+ �•.' .�ar�t '>r, l u~ 41 1 I �1N' ) N l g�; S Nas kt ”, ry::, • ill t �ff} {�{1j{1, 1 I11+�E4ijj• �1j1 Li'l�U j` / .� j lc k' r ef` { lb ' 14IrMF�• I:HicilNiillll! >11 'L ■ _'I i. i S'�csi rn_ is 7^',,,Y f c.+< e•41.a dt �CN—�^ „�4. �° p e1 S `R'w i ` . �a<'ROi jlt': .j�'. 1 + i f f • EhFI 1`, 12 2 ° : •y = I f i a Y r. 1 cp � �' ? `r .t bf, Ill li 10 .'14 $b 11 4 6l • 1] j r". �" w.� <.s`. ?d �+'k� .� � n n■ •n ■ e Y tl tl tl t ■ ■ c l ti.,..,. 1�l my M1' TM Sri•a�. rr` ♦�"l' !Y` k 1 1 o n 1 1v Ig 'rte P 4 F x ry aAY ;,t g . v j ■ + l i m `l6 F in I C + s'-,: ;i ce tt ■. li�,. L f ill y .tali° 11h! ;! co 0 a ° 11 Ifflllj Ili I ffr �i a d k. � d .' iil1141 IdlIffflll 111eFiN1 crili11<«! � ,wtl.I $ � l , 1 iii. « s ' . . 1 i - mow-. 4 'S -af u • cA, € X. i !♦ .,.,. --E." l• 2 A If 2 Ist\ ( i (I)Wild aDYNIYlla,oNIavxo I h �, ~ 1 f t SOt4£73'Sd IdVN 'flHIAYd'QHId<ILLS PIDIS'S[dS ? m ~ S - ._.....• j cog a.IIAS'Iowa xvo�taxxwT tos ..�..d•. !;3!s:- J -^ 1 a z (^- it!!iloi tQOISIAIQ S9OI 1L S W. � i i 811 I g .4 fi e /NH NV3TTtid e p ° !It11/!,I AWAH.I.Yaa VAH'ElORAVENYOriaa I I i I�� 1 ! @ c 1331.1S 9011M NYI011Oa 21S O "",---•.-,,I_•_... c • ,133x5338 E 4— E .. 3 I '� I a. y P 1 iii° i °,�' . '7�* € i Q m i L..�.�� 1 api,. .,-t•. i ;„r I lilt, t'J o pt'1 11' c .y 1 _ 1.1 - I "t I_ i CO c4 F ,43I I 1 I{ `fir" ! z� m ° s 4. I I e 4, IL g-I 1 ao o 71 € ! If ilg 1116: t 1 la y aa<2 3i' I'1 `� ) e` I� I 11 I 11 — 4 i ! $ � � I 3 I 9 1 I i f H 1 5 'y w Y 41 ' I \ \ / /Z I. 1 ftpa I l- a) ate) # f. ► ,i ;/ 4 i i i G§ &i 1 , I I e/c'Es Y [/ , i!iIIi1IIU S ' ! iJ* ^. m a E 1 1 g o PRIVATE DRIVE h f�I \ b (COMMONS) 1 st tt 14, i f4 p \ / ti- t!. I1 iQ I t-' ,'.42 k ;e .k 1 f4 11 P ■ 'l 1 co ill ...... CO ' I ri , ' ..i4e,,T 1,1 , , ,,, , i, z , c,_. , t.,,lb t�+ ?.a.....„_. .4. y+ a^� . 7 fi a, c. \__.,, i ,, Ili ..., „3 4. , : ..:, , L '' !% y25".E'ii:7;t iIA; a ♦ Y .ss. ' r) f I: "1 I a.t I.. . fit, ,,',OP��'' `."V, ".I l i a{ 3 2s£•e 1( •� 1 *V I I I a) t i , Syl r4. iN+s9 p`t 1 f o U)a iE T I ii LL h d ^-rt # 1 f- I , t �o 1°. I 1 'rP1 I �1„ I i, .7. i T r i i I i t f � a s 1 . 1 1 t I -I I i W 1I�\ 1 fl 1 I a. I I. i I I 'I I ¢f .{7 .44-1 � I 1 11 a.' ,1 I t ■ ( 11 1 d- i I 1-3dHS YIN1 M3ud01 i3S ir I mot rrtia�. r �..� A • C a3 ! `4 (( (z) d'�VIIQ w DHIQVfD ~ ~ I ! SOIt E 77I SH1JVN 'O ZIAVd'ONI& LS fi NOIS'BJ.IS p l SO9HIIf1S"aM axvo H ff1V'I Ifs -- 111 1 1:S i 5 o • f 1' Ili NOISIAIQ SDIAIEIS HouVIS riV ra.scuoH• a[e 4 ! Z F ) ! 1iYHt1V0I IId Av .a nar1f�oeAVam r a I I I I ig . . �. a 1~ ____- 1.l,llll{ — — N CO 133HS SSLL M31A RH,1103 33S S 133HS 336 /� 4 aa.n I � n f ��! 1 1- � : i ,•".' I I © e] f� I- �l✓ It mI a Im .1 ■I • b r co * `A1. y ' { I I I m . i r I - b . I I ' i. ' I c I CO pc€ 1 .f EgI c p1p i i .E sia�J ;, it$i ®..33 j I 1 d I ;.l L° n °'° I I o 1 w i II I dJ B e 1 c 1 c. 1111/ 1 - , y■51.! I 1 e C. fr I QI A I 1 j u r�y php "♦ l -! ,1 r<1 I iii!ei flii 1 I i .-'1,1 i U( U 1 p R 41 w'p. '5! 2 g# 1' _1 11 I Rry I ct p ,� , ?II i edo- -i I. i1 I .. 1 i c i.sN , l it 1 II 1 N 0 ` , f3 i 11 4 I PRIVATE DRIVE j' �LIIt' - o i? 1 ,I z I An c• l.) I {ST.LUGiA) xI ;`-i1, I� m .., I I Q 1 z ' 1 , ;I I I d I. .1 i m V I ,,' 1 ...u)T� P ' i1;� 5 �, ,Q ; a.LU I. c0. ..fin 1.9 1111 i a � °,I CO 0 c II ii ' a.0 r. AlII i 1 I 0-) w t co`Tn a .. 1 I Iii I'� I I LL r d 4 $ Fgg$i' t ,. . !_J 1 1 W..'rq;0b j it. ' �� akj i .al' � € ` i J rr,ej,. tt 4, I ,;, is •1 1 i 1 . tr '1� 1 1 ,� 1 '`1, it 1 11 1� it I i i L_._ 1 _# ......__I,......_ C 133HS 336 .....S SULLM31A d01 33S I 1 I -L-- 4 iv6ii H (E)NV'id aov iv a w oHIQVHfl L vn .t L I 1 3 001$1'I{SS IdVN 'oNIAVa'oNLI[N.IS 'NOIS'auS - 6 x € n j 509 suns'SARIaYVO'ISNflYItoe .a..o.� 1191 - €� " Z ' l i fib NOISIAIaS3IA S oLet MUM o1E °E 6 E i — 1 1 Ii 1 @'g t t o 4 111 1CVH AIYJPIgd p �i:i,iL �, ® AVMIiLVdaUVAa7nOeAVHNVOI'ISd I I L h 9 3 i ! N mm uw.a o 4133!19 334 O \\ .11' I4 1 ial . i O 133N88W1 M3M MILLS 338 - O {jvVj �y 1 i f` r1\ g ff 1 " n a 1'-j i I11 4 �l '4 I, a N' • i 6 1 i I Ef 74 , 66 1 7 4 tit �I I S 4 11 ■ 4 1 1 m -., b i I is 1 11 CO y I 1 CO I jb l : t� i -s t 1 1 11 qilkii as ` � i . — a.o 1.L' ti i4 1I l II .o,! P 1 T s1 g+''''' P 1� m ' 1 Irf CO c ,'.;. '1 c.x I I N 8— +��1 I T I 4 0 I 1 N — \ (--- gi ,3 ! 4, I, I 0 1 Er i .? 11 t 1 } 1 S 1 0 I Q 4 1f as • w Pia III I ( ■ t 1 y 1 if "1 1 I lit ,, j 1 , Pt it 7 O %I I I F �• ,1 I 1 ._ \ '`+ 1 � 4i I �I I 1• 0 1 I � a ` ; I I 11 o c t II U C7 NIC OLAS " , 1 1 t i I I■ o a BVt) 1j �� °� a eI ` :: I I �- I ii III° I f` a• a) �= i ( 1 111 E 11 `: ill li I ca I Z E e IIi§ to 0Id t r °, {�.is N. I \ J o 0 0 I i • 4 C U < pl° - • v �1 O ,.. _ _____.._ __ • ; 4i—�1a • . a 7- a 0 ‘� to'3 t ;;,} ,r S i a f I N 4y, L A F r . i to ( H 4+ 1 zr f ' i I z ■ 0 I 11111 !ill I/ 1 -0: I i i i R 4 fI " ? 1 i I _ ,, I I ' 1• 1 { / 11 `I �l I I I I ' ii 1 it I � I 1 I _ $ I I■■ 'i I` i ,s c.1}qt, I 1 1, I I 4a�L1' •#i 1 I 1133H8 333 133HS 81141 MiIA d01 33S • ■ i 1 — ,. .... .....7...8.7. II V IN- i*1 2 A iv. In 1 e 04 xvia aovxtvaa w oNlavao 1/4o,,., ... 1- i, i 801PEZ.1'527dVN 'oxrAva'mums w maw'aus t E S--- • I.i. i so alms.annia xvo Trawl los ---- laasai I O _ KOLLVLSPIVX,L MON Z — co 1111 NOISING SKIIMEEIS AVE{ItIV3ITati Ca abloavaco-gacrosafre ii"1111- ill:411ti o 111!1"' •Ail! apt yegy AvniaLva avveiriaoa Ave xvor-raa I,,,,li is I I I • 1 40ffri 2.111■1 a p p 1 cn c .Lialat 51141 SAZIA 5101100 33S O i T ri 0 113316 335 E 4 I' 111" 1 1 I ■1 i •P I\ 0 1 I E I 2 -, li ' i•t 1 tt 1 t ill ' ■t ilk\ „_ V . . 1 6 31' ' I ill r t ‘ 11 I A. 1 k, ' „ 3 I 1 --+... 1 tg t ..,, • - .. • 1 i a ;1 . t E. '. ■ \ t, \'''' i c Is \,.....‘,,,f\- • m 0w, 1 ‘ < d-I.N., 1 VI. C 7:1 I 1 30 lr ' . '3 i 0 0 t 1 :*=14$ It cn f ,t 1 i , 1 CO 0 1 i 11 /I\It•F la 4 z CO iii 4+, If\ vkl \ a.it 2 PRIVATE DRIVE •c...r\ 11 h ep \ I i-A i I fig t.) ill 4•0 ..0 ,. -c.▪ c 1'I ik4p1 4,---, s'ir 1 i 1 to 14. I 111'4, k.a14 , .., , 1 Ifr-le 1 utt-4 at ' gtxaap t 1 - - -c 1.. 1 rt. 'E * L. --------....L° 't '`I''' \Pin \LfErk 1 \s” C 0 I ,----- 0 0_ \ I it 1\ t 3 3 I ' .81 I 1111.111."111.119 'En o 1 1 t ofk ?it E a) 0 kl 1 1 I \. co ° \ 3` / 03 r= 131 I 1 i liki Hill Ito, .4.1. rs,,,. IIIM EVI 1 ii / , V.,„ i li it I 1 tili 1,, A )A ,i,, , , * . t k 1 I 1: ! I i 8 1 1 A ... ), ,\i i 0.)• o ' \ ' 10 0 C:3 Eli 1..„, 1 ...—... "..,11 . LI v- ,i__I fttr.....7••••77.7g,:. , 7 >, 1 i ■1 c co u) \''' — . ›... I 0 ,1 ' ' ' '' ho s.$4k0■4$': 10s•t4h;■ ,S$ 03 0 1 ' 1 1 1411,..: C24.14 $ i..$ftgeerW7If'.4:11.17.11,- ,'-4. 0 c . ■ li 1 1t * t 2 i 1 r to A. 1 2 i a IS •"' , 4" il 0 t I ID 7E 0 110E 11 1 . , ' iii i vs 76 co t• P 1 . 1 ri I ‘ 1 pg 1 I ---, .."` LL N- 0_ I , -- 6 . ., ,....., — - tt: 4 ,, cA. i ' i . i . .' • ' ' r r .-' 1,, 0,— , 46 , .. 44 0 — ci5) l• 4, ,i. '41111110 . i , 0 • - ot r >- , = ,4`. ' co ii = = ,killi2 ilii 1 ', / , L , • • , ,, , ,-- , : 1 0"Illii it ig '.' / / Y ■ OP ,.., .1 . :$1. ". 11 ' *, )I Lki II li lit dP I '11 1811 r 11 1 St• $ : I 1 t 1 . I, ... .— .. ,i 1 I: ' , ;I ...1. _.j....tUts 1 -N4-4 41 S 13314 335 13314514/331A do,.sas • 1 .......... . ... ...................1.6,1 pt, 2 A I it t' (s)xvIaao nuvaasoraavao e— .e i c I 80111la'maw 'ox nva oruanres av►�xs"aus tt I/11 509 wane aniaa XVO TaXaY I MS 8 Z — F 1 1I' NIOISIAIa mums Qt.OM a_ :A4 i o ! o OBI awe xv��rraa awbRLva auwnaInonAvexvonaa I a.I ��a � N • 1!hilf f; -�� 4 J3.1HS 336 0 1+3366630.M3NM 6 '' . 0110336 .. ! j. f/ E - UCC i`T1r, ' I' II '�) -I S ! /1'f i fl► . 6 t O+ 1 { '� i• I ♦ r .) a) j 1 • j ; I II �) rff i i t 1 . �o d f I .� ' .-i-- m ..'. 1. I 1" I la /, I ;, 1•v €, 1 f m a ^� I li I ' ; ® II .4 ass '° r *{s �4, 1 f► --P lt M m lM '' g 1a I Il 1, a f , .us�:� s 1 0.'i I j` 1 ii '�; it 1 I a hTb 31 ^1' y,f ' II .L' Q Iiia 1 ® y -:1 I r]._ I!, f III ! II c 73 hir a) m ER `•/, , ' `"I s§ gig v, I it ( �+ f ..Y t Egli I t I I Ol k y 1 p L ' Q O i,.t/37 <OI' I 6 I ` ._6444 1 t I N 40 °1 �' J'1� , �i II I 6 <I H o I ' II i. PRIVATE DftiVE i ,. -.' j(WATERPARK 1 ,�� t f I (n v PLACE) ©1 I/ '';3 5'"7 i I I I NCn A3. <;T,,7,`p IIga � d F'� ` :� r¢ `« .j}Q co M 1 °t j I TT) 41 '15 t_? `"'x f I CO of t$i I(' I I7*-] �'Ili NCnIfie �,+ S:T +• 3 X91 1 .: 1 xgi 6 m rn ,i.. ..4! I 2a a! I I , 1 _o or LL N- co l ' .ti tj� 4.' s l£€ f 14.,4.1 1.3611 '1 .r.-. 1 I . 11 ■ gi p► € I e" �� , , , V 1 J.. d'€ I v F.� ' 6,1 iii � 1 ig 1 aR i �"SS 11 X .&4/1 I v I F < b 1 •.•M'` ........ 413366335 13336&61 M3N 301336 i �, ` it. t j i (9)NV'Ia 7DVNIYNa'oNIav1I0 0o h _c �t 1 I 8016E 11101aVN 'ONIAVa'0N[d[N.IS V NDIS'Ms t .- -cS Z } ° if xOISIAia SgJ1A2 S a tiOUVIS st coo�a e e`°11;' 2 6 o AVHxvOTlad .� AVAAHJ.VaaxvAfl'IfI011 I.V0NY3118a I311II1 1 ti ��;lIII C - E g_ ...„..p - .S.l 13314 SIN/MalA 140/108338 +Ad .� �1-+ •3H 23 4��; o ' . '1 o l`J� f 1 "{ 3 I ' 1 d 11 I I CU 1 1 i I / Cll ° m I I �NI'�-' j I I UN..p 1 cri CO I \:... a 19 ,.Ati', 'f } I 1 Zit t N 1 I it>, . 1 I 1 CO • C 1 i y ' Q 1 I d y 4k.it'' ' ' 4 f''' .4 c . , I . O• CD C7) 4' h I I I \ 1 I 1 ',-..0 1 45 :l 1 r I 1 i � N } .I i 1: ? � 0 I ii m 0 T la, O A + } 14 • i 3f i pcyy a 4 . _ ;s--. . — -> ell l %I 1 N N R > � F . '' r I 1 ;I p I <o.,. I .* A 4.4. A r U '� �- 41 4 I __ .s L..I• • O 1 i s I i..1''. • to m I I I ': i tl ~?I• 'l i I I a.0 •' % '1i `l ! i/ :i 1, 1}... 3' 9;F .°,}I4 1 a, f' t °f . i 1 t' c7 N 9k % �� n, 1 O I °, i I N•, , s t 1 I 1 // g_ i J't - 0 @ pill $ °R 1 • lb• - to uh\ ' i1 11 i. 11of11$811 i II .4I 1!ii ® I I,, I 1 1 �\ �I❑ ❑ ❑ . , ill 11 4 1 --t. t • "It 11 1 t $ 1 I t '• h °'41 id )<qII 1 i 1 D i (`\, Y i `, t f M %I 1 11 -� II t 11 1 , ..I Q 1 l I} I P iVATE DRIVE 1 t 1 1 }} \ (. P D'ANTIBES) i� Ya t • A.` c'.1 & 'en t 1 . ?`i 11 3.�1 � CYr ll 14}3 1 �� ` { "' pi�i.m •^'1 Fb.,,1'G T' t 1 1 t e{ ♦ {I 1 4l'.x. 1 . • s +4 1 J t---�_ 1 `�I 1 133H441H1.11 1133H433S 31M d31334 i I .........4+I,..0' .4 QI IQ.a.=CI I Lt.vrv- - 6 - 2 A ILF t co 0 133.4.3 5041./33.1101103 333 0 ® , , . . i i„, %. %, fl I (6) :li lot 1::„ " ,;, al CO \ 1.,.:= .4 (7) \ i 1 i 1 i I 11 co To 1 F. • 0,f ill Oil 1: ! I Eli 1, iii!i lib . # 4FA7n. I WAN 1 d o ,t.....1.4.maw#.,,... ail (I.):LI BEACH 0 '". .11 \\*\\ co rr, ')'' j Cri takl, I ii \\\ r trwr I 333H6 SOU 3333%<103 333 | V : )1VN�,161 2 A 14- _ , rc., . . ............_ F t (8)NY7d flOV1 W Ia v DNIaVYD o 0 L! I SOLPE Id'SHIJV 'DNIAYd'flNMflUS3PNDIS'BLIS `- -C • i i j SC9 suns`BAIZia]tYO 7fiTIITY'I I08 .«..d. III y r:$- z "- .h�i AIOISIAIQ Sg�IAZIffS ac e�a�oe a�Iaaie E _ ! I 0 1ii'F AYH NVoTIiid ........ AVAVI.Yd aHYAfl7ROR AYR NYDT1Hd I I I i Ili;. •`F r ! 1 I N .ta�IJll C O 133146 6,1411613,6 6101101il 63S 16 LOONS 333 1 Gtr I. 11 -a V' 11if4 042.si- o C! n , , .° g I iii • N n a— Diaz 5 -O gt; 11 $ 1 PRIVATE DRIVE1 i N I- 1 i �` (THE COVE AT MARBELlA)° 31 • 1 ( Ii 1i! In CO !'3( . .�`}'. '.n .°r.CO.. 1/161 I ._,) II 111 { I 1:. li t'. 4�r I I ; Ei4�'v, ^^)1.1 m r 1 I (� 1- i y5 1 3 • :� = f;.. E5 Ray i i 11 g ' rill! 1 ; m , i I w I 0 C7 0 5 )' ', .—w k p $ 0 r Ili a pp883. 3 Cn U a y3 1 i s 01(1.S'..�. ( j5 'Ira 51$4' 4. r $ 3 ti c I ! o [• f Fil - s i ,C7 -`/�1 5c o— PRIVATE DRIVE I f 03 (VILLA CORONADO) I I I � { 1 x • o col 4.7 is,`�' ; 1 3 �i r ¢g "i 4ga n,h II V - 'III Qiil' pp 41 ill V. --q a;- i r/X i Rz S5 1 d E Fill It" ti a I S ri !ill/ 1-+ may, T 1,..::-' it I ca-.I , m i i N Clip1/ 1`i (�.�, i `i 'U it fikx, r 1,.. .� CV . N . 0 i gg v �\ — (-Ni ._. 4 4y f1a 5I stir ifl^ T q 11 is ♦,-- I 4 frj1.CO I I A e I -8 p8Y r..,,_..I,,.�,-\.I x$EE FC I '^41144 i6i 1 C �� j1M ..i. �J p¢ 1: ° 'I iE i . r 3 ,an.,,,Y I �'� (p i I S �1 Q es t P PO j I f�- 1 1;1 i, {" j{ ' I .., ,,1 NI. ell 1 th r! 5 1 i i1m i.b 9g �l 11 [' � II i i 1 6133HS 33S 133618 S114160N d01 33i — LLI/Piltinb ,(2------ (6)liVIA aeriturea V-- sows la Imam 'ONIAVd`0141eMUS 2#MOTS tux 1.. --E------------ . IA I so9 nuns`swan wo lawny'jog ___ -- eaveii 0 --- NOISIAKI MIMES NOILVIS?NUL MEM 6A"111— Z Ili uhf Qt.SNOVOICO-BOSSISM O "' .i 11/11 AVE xvorraa ......... AVASILINJ(DIVATMOEI AVE(tiVarlad 03 C 1331411 Sail WM 100.1108 WAS O Z I,133HS 33S - E _ ,!... \ i • -„, ,:' 1 apt 1 1 i 1 "" t 6 ‘..„, - I , , . t i 1 si - 2 0.' * 4 1 ;.sa • .1 , 1 Z \ 1 0, . '..e■ '''''' ''' Igi '. • : `tt, .',-.1 , Ile a .. I ..1 1 ill , P ,,_ . . , lt 1 1 —-A 1 16 1" / ,,r 1 $ -,-:1- '\ w> 9,,l x 1 ,r, , ,i_ritif.); /.., ''''• 5 A 4/1 4ci° 61, Ills --\----4. -5 P 11111111.1 -It' '7- 'it , V--.‘ 7/- N ..,,,,- 't t, r ,git i i _ 0 t. • , 4. ., • --; I co iti " ' '0-\./- 1 fin t.., co i 1 ..__) !ill 1 .' egtlgi , . it c i .F/1° it I ti co -.4k- -i', I -3- 151 2' .,, C 1 .!----7 •_,---*- ' ‘..... 0 ,..,,,,,/, , /-,-., - 1 .1' c5 6 ' Y-1----> ,--,A , ,i • i .... , F;,,, , .. r--- . -N. S.. ..,ji in, 11 to /7) 'I. ..1 ' c 1 / 2 1 1 7 33 , 1., , , .. , 1 i c li ,,,i t_ ,,,„", ' ' 1, 15Pit ( 1' 1 < l,:37621-.... ', w-,,,.., To I ':.7• 3, ,3,;;3:i_1,4,-,ors, 'I ..,-11-1,, ii- , 1 ' 4 Iliu ii; .f•,:tP iff il:3' 'I t-2,¢ '1/4:..' _..,,d t i 1 : 'C V ■11q1! I t' s I Ipihi 1 it 1 t 5-.. f2 1.e. 1. ...' - a ■IF ! .1 < PRIVATE DRIvE ,---".1 lit `;loill i5. ,o,; c -0 (MARBELLA) ..,,, 2 t ;11 iiig illi i afg 4 ;.!illi.i 451111 lii u)(..) ,; i! glo ---- 1 .....\., ""3, I(r-\ . til 1 iliii PI • 1, cnrY , 41 1'g ! .481 1 gl •-, 4ri, .,,, , iit f '-- 1 • 1 CC 0 •.3'1 ''''V,'I ilha , 12 g 4' .,----- ' - -4 i ,,, \ 1 1 . / /11.i. ' 'CI 1■ in 1./1 ccs— • ,1 ;', i -, ,-)li 1 II 1 . iti, , ' -., 1 1 I I .•-..4 / ET) a) 1- 1 .0 E IIP' 4 . I 'ii;ii ill PRIVATE DRIVE o ill o 11 L7 :7..q ".44 ‘-,• iliz c 0_ 4k.-.13-.,' '' C.4.3,-L'r > • l lat ,'„„TT4.'I.)-,'.,•'• - - - - 1 i 1 .'!..—,1.f. . - U_ I,- a_ + , AfA'1. .i,..- ,.-1'• . t 11 IP i ',',g, I t"'S 001.-i 5 e' 1 , 1'''” "' I .P5 l'A ‘1, :fr(-N;,..4- b'', l'i \-/---:---,L) ,, . .,,), 1 121 , i , , ,-, 8, _ „. f k il al i ‘1114 1111 ! lial • 4.4 -, 4i1 .0 --k) 1, 11 kil xv 1(1! IA I,e i 4" I , ,1 1 , ' . ,,..,- i i I I I ;i , i I !ill ,1, i l'•ii i l'" ' /--tlY----,---- . ..., , 1.33145 SIMI/MIA dP13,33 1 Ot 133.4S 33S • actvJ»931.1.=al I.I.VIMJID f- I I— r I WI)N riaao DIIVIIQwflHIQV1[D i ,rc I„ •-.1 --E c !I , 801/11d SaldVN 'OHIAVd'ONIdRLI.S 1 HDIS$JIS g b r ^-- ( 509 aura'alma xvo'IH'mar'tog .+ !i ! 'r,_ J §. O + 1 iI , NOISIAII SH"JIA)I3S NALCVISWWILIL t - I- p - z ;n' AVB VOI IIa w ° 8 p � ,!— ! 9 o AVMILLVJ aZIVA97RDe AYH NVJIbd I i_1 i gt 1 1 ! ) r 0 .-_nt.. 133HSSMJ.M IA W0i10S was _,....... 1 r -.`. r ' '.1.-44 i >r o .. 2 R I - 1 - o I I 1 i i r o R ›, - >J31111! 11 il, , i _ 1,' cAt \ o I- -� X 0 A. 0 0 1 tilt ,1 i N • I ; • i I 1%. Y.\ @ 4 ill! Agri a ! , 1 fi x ° i < 1 a I._F .� t i �1 + I y co - I. g+ � $ I c I ! r `' 1 1 .---_ � "\U 1 j s . ; S s N i 5/e ; g eV vs `, 1I 71 1 t 4 o a I Ii .n a) , 6 a) , I i ': .4 1 I 4.ii r'- w cu E 8 1 I a; �'' - '�] °N)) S1 .4 A-. \ 'ff i 'I is 111 , ilk C >., I 1 L----1 ill. Tl Q U 'a. , .i R l/ ivy Rj� o i I { * � .f•co I I 1.� m�.- (�„ ` 4 a ;; g PRIVATE 1 t 2 d al / fa` (MONTENERO) 1 j L.L. 0_ / a Its. II p'11 Ili! I 1!. T, i l 1 1111 . t S 1! n 9° • I I lin3 ' 1 f I 1 Rg1 i aa� .S 1 j r 1 a ,*,/ am 1 I � i 1 I_d'"' c.\ 1 . I: i I t� j'I t +P , asi . 4 “0 4 33S 133HS Suit MalA.01 MS -ALA v•ra3a.L tili1VrJ6 I 2 A t 4-, Ern / m.•'•- 1 (u)xv'Iaaov w awDNIaviID ^ zy� I: 1 I i 80I$'E 1a'sa iavx 'DNIAVJ'DNMDtZS v Nom'sus = ,� t 509MK'S'aARialivo^1231111Y1 I0s ....... 13 3 3_g 4a 5 z a 1' it ( xo)s)Aia MIMES ` > , ` pip a i " i c ' p i f)a k AVE NVDfl 1 avMALVa aHVAff'It1o81iva xY'JT�d �A .. ! 1 OM o _ 1�NSSw1ee31nrauoeaas... �+ �_._J/.« E ,` i 1 1 I T g �: g I, f O .. iry ,+, s'Ig ,. so w 1s y e is E; € /J •_•A. m x.:/ y� 1 11 II k� ( ''w j/I J �f yyt s PfJ ;' I a I<L �g S 'C i / 1'f l �t El-ti 1111 111,€5. 1 5 //s `( l v >s I € �` ,:, //III cl `, /. .�` t'a. II D O � \ SJ ti a8 ' Io N R° r / 4 s 1 {I� as } B 1. / `� ;..�..?' 1 6r.: 1.w t 1'iy ! s g ii 1 I ]7I, I K `:y t 45 Q 1 1 ,� 1 1 ) F S It , a1 m f # 03 �I gj B $ ! ) E J 1 I 'c I[ Q i1 'j (r�0 Z' I/ I o cl. - 1 1 i 15v i1 :I l Z co III / ;f i1/ l LI- �,� II 1 i 1 Q @a iu 1 I III e.! F <"�► ..ii,'. .N. I I p �a 3gg �. "` �Sa1k+ W �,, III 1 ,l -ag ,- r II u) iii I ; 1 11 Itl i m 1/ 111 I U I `a> . I II I 1 !1111111 33� 11 I I " '1- Ir II 011 • 'I Ilan II +',a�!ilit 3)33 q' I I /I I I I 1 ,� € 1 I I I 1. `'l + 1 II J II p n I 1 c :� t 1Iw II > 2' �r11fo' , s{#'-0 44 ._l .i ■ �� II y- f 1 11 N ° 0J.'d jr .`� r II 1 ma i • e E 4 a a 4,I I_I ar l ; 7t jI Ij-v 1 i I 1 ilik cu u) Igo it ` ; I I CO PRIVATE DRIVE I 1 i m o (MONIENERO) l° ; �" II 6 II ( 11 aM I '- i 1 I . ..ti 1 U CO a U 40.11.° l 1£ ..yr I i. c, N 44 I I I Q ',.. , s l m 1 U g NtN i'<:4 :�4 I 1 + . :tr yEi t t .J s 1 1 m a a oi i -0 > . , .., . a)'O I 1*i t i - 1 .. I ; i I 0.1 t{1 p Y R i 44 q /II I �- te I r - S' '" alai I T H k,,Y ,�t. , f Y P / l',-;.",—..,,,,,L L ': 's11 y S1. I p I/ I- / 1 I J IP I 1 ! .' 11 I I p I, •• Ih` +I > 1._..._.... I .a s::_l Ii �I «��« 21133H93'39 133N8 MI M31A KU 33S ----m-nmmsmmmn••••Er't'r''''Tr'''''" ,,, ... .., Ham(" - L 7 1 801K14`Sd7dYN =Ma LHa NOILIMU SNOD _—__------_--.-_ ,."..' n -C 1 SO9 allf1S`annia ivo-munvi I08 ,_— e 8 t!ii- 1 ;t t.$' . NOISIAEa s�JU�s oO" > I E pi g i l R i i l l t i g �!!� AVffNVoTT3d FAVAULLVciaYVARIf1OHAVeNV3rEd N C OI . U ;) `l D E • '' t 4 @j t 9 co II 41 hi 1 1„I 'I;r = #� Irk _ I �. 1�': s 4 ,i 1 itf a I ' 1li 4 iq Itt11� i; -_- 2_ .11;1'1; -. # 111 O _Eli' 1;;/ tg.: Q I F. ! •ye Ik( ° I . f 1 t -66 i$ t 7 O ! y. t i I —i °lilli el cow - —r ;, M a*�Fa x.: �S 9 a' b 1��` °'l €n 41 0)=_ ; r } r'' i�i N t tl C* f Y i9 r r :�■fir W :; i o ° 00 i II! 00 t Eel -5 fY (� s€�l I I p{� C € i P g E rp"\ 6' I i I € € >• ; cplf o a • ch) Dull I I I eV1//i ZI ICI' 1t1`e t 1 vIg1111 Z m = 1`- y# e I I 1 E g� 4 t RI ( E It I I i p E i 113#` tl 11 1 Ri 1 i $ EE` 1 i I ; 1111 E (nom iE I I I i1IIEg wi � G1 I I YI / Ir N: p 4 m> > ;; :,o� —O'er # E i9 �J — E iE M 2,'::4-,,,,,,:S%,%‘2):::-(4):, E © 1E 0 o©©oeo .t. 0 110 o©ooao V M B1 k yU4'. � ./�q� ' y e t P 0 ., g R o1 i\1�� a 'l c t y lJ t .oa rn e f . LL a II g pi � 1��1/ 1I II 1 Q N ! it Qt �I Y .. t 1 j' t=11= r ''iv' ; Y �' f''. v. ...= „,a tp,1� T is// Igo I { : — 1.., ___/„, ,, ilt ..- , t....,-1, _',Ig: . i W. lit @ p I I cl t.;ni-11 16 1 I--1 ._ won .`; -e5 a �- i .., • 161 2A * . .\- , SWIM'loxlxo3,ttffilu�s „, ,,r, 'X y 1 8ai4£IA%s law V NOlS0�'II� '4, g j cog a7 flS'HAmcnivo'ImInV7 i� ..a.o.. !3 !i.^i _ 'Z'M' �t t MO1S a S MA'Ias o ,MICO- ma `g f o ii i i I P ”1 t i • I 1 .1411 AYH N[YJI'Iad AVMHWJ cDWAa I(109 AW NVOI7eid 11 N 8 I t I ; ' i P i i co • i ' , , It It i y.{ Illi �p m t g ilk!,r ""lied °c° at i,-,- I It ill p a�'r J I i fi 1,I EE' a E N 1 r' 1!' 111\ \ , , 1 To I jt qy ; 0 1 i / .1/ 11' • - - _ 1 4 , 1 e; at 1 c l', i DIY:j . O 0 , (4 U l I t as I' , ; i 1 i III a• c ; is m `t v I g. �; � ! w� I' • m „1 II X I o, oa) x 1 N °i I 1 11I ( V Bi i E N , CD 1 1 1 > /, . C Q z 1 i CO c as 1 �; 1 i T.)U o #k 1 l • N- 8 • 3 :\ ccs a — - 1, ti t, i rn , i r r i . 1 1 . 1 ‘. 0 . \ i , ‘, 1 I, A , i • „ 0- • , , , 1 ' / i ' s V '. ' I i ,' i " •\\, / V `� 1; G, € .,... \ s b „ „ • •. 4i , , ,, ! ..,.. 1, ,, . i ; . , x, ,. , \ 0, .,,,, ,-- , ....„ i , ... : ., 01 ,, , .. .. , ,. /1.,,. i y . / , i 2A1 1) Original Message From: LukaszKyle Sent: Monday, February 11,2013 3:37 PM To: Ian Orlikoff(info @signaturetreecare.com) Cc: ResnickLisa Subject: Pelican Bay Blvd. Tree Analysis The area that Ian did was approximately 6200 Lin.Ft.That leaves approximately 26,800 Lin. Ft.of sidewalk area remaining on Pelican Bay Blvd.and the length of the median is about 16,000 feet long. Maybe that helps him estimate the time required. Thanks,Kyle February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 1 6 A (.k/ ISA Celt ie, rist 7dii. Pathways Ad Hoc Committee Report-Review of expanded proposal from Ian Orlikoff, Page 1 of 1 signaturetreecare.co PROPOSAL Page 1 ecologiclandcare. Signature Tree Care,>;�.c Proposal#: 5170 481 10th Avenue N.E. • Naples, Florida 34120 Office: (239)348-1330 • Fax: (239) 348-3133 F N G LA <ER71ilED Email: info @signatUretreet::are.com AR•ORtST • IAN ORLIKOFF ISA Certified Arborist till-1037A Florida Certified Horticulture Professional#H605655 Pelican Bay c/o Dorrill Mgt. Proposal Date: 02/12/2013 5672 Strand Court Customer#: 2164 Suite 1 SalesRep: Ian Naples, FL 34110 Item# Quantity Description of Services Units UnitPrice Tax Item Amount 1 56 Trees per hour 125.00 No 7,000.00 Client requested a rough estimate of time that would be required for the arborist to review trees, mark map with options and consult report as previously completed for another section.This is only an estimate of time,which may have to be adjusted if more or less time is required to complete the project requested. As per Pelican Bay Services:The total amount left of roadway on both sides of the road as well as the median estimated at 69,600 feet.The area that was already done was approximately 6,200 Ft.That leaves approximately 26,800 Lin. Ft. of sidewalk area remaining on Pelican Bay Blvd. and the length of the median is about 16,000 feet long. Arborist Consultation.A"From the ground"basic inspection, inventory and consultation with client • on options for pathway project. Provide options for care regarding pathway project as needed and mapping with options noted. Consultations(price listed is cost per hour)include meeting time, property review,emails, phone calls and tree mapping, report writing. Informational literature will be provided as indicated. All methods accomplished thru ANSI Z133.1 Specs. in compliance with Collier County code and industry standards. Not responsible for underground sprinkler lines. Terms:payment is due upon completion unless other arrangements have been made. Proposal SubTotal: 7,000.00 Should you have any questions, or if you wish to make any changes to this Proposal, Required Deposit: 0.00 please do not hesitate to call us. Please sign and return as soon as possible. State Taxes: 0.00 • Proposal Total: $7,000.00 Signed: Date: Estimate is Valid for 15 Days. 16 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 1 2 t 7d. Pathways/Tree Canopy Subcommittee Report-December 2012 Observations submitted by Susan O'Brien Page 1 of 1 Number of bicyclists,walkers,&joggers using pathways Pelican Bay Boulevard(PBB)near Sandpiper parking lot December 2012(Submitted by Susan O'Brien) Location Dec 26 Dec 27 Dec 28 Dec 29 Dec 30 Dec 31 11 10-11 a 1:30 9 -10 a 3 4 8a-9a Totals (Direction) p p p- p PBB(east) 21 22 10 19 11 51 134 Bicyclists PBB(west) 40 34 16 25 23 12 150 Pathway (east) 5 5 3 0 1 0 14 Pathway(west) 22 6 20 10 5 1 64 Walkers Pathway(east) 8 6 5 9 5 8 41 Pathway(west) 22 24 17 25 13 15 116 Joggers Pathway(east) 6 12 0 7 4 6 35 Pathway(west) 9 14 0 9 8 8 48 Notes: 12/26 - 4 walkers passed 1 jogger without incident - 4 bicyclists passed 1 jogger without incident - 5 walkers passed 1 walker without incident 12/27 1 walker passed a bicyclist without incident 12/28 1 bicyclists passed 4 walkers without incident 12/29 1 walker passed 2 bicyclists without incident - 1 bicyclists passed 1 walker without incident 2 walkers passed 1 jogger without incident 12/30 1 bicyclist passed 1 walker without incident 2 bicyclists passed 1 walker without incident 2 walkers passed 1 walker without incident - 2 bicyclists passed 2 joggers without incident 12/31 1 walker passed 1 walker without incident Observations: 78%of bicyclists used PBB;22%used the pathway 49%of pathway users were walkers;26%were joggers;25%were bicyclists 72%of pathway users used pathway on west side of PBB;28%used pathway on east side of PBB Submitted by Ms.Susan O'Brien 1.,. 2 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Service ivisi n Bird ReguaeSsRm ry Y il 11a.New Business-Establish priorities and identify upcoming meetings . Page 1 of 2 January 2,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 10. Setting Priorities(Keith J.Dallas) Page 1 of 2 Setting PBSD Priorities By Keith J. Dallas As I end my term as your Board Chair, I have started to take inventory of the - issues that I feel are outstanding, in order to avoid items being inadvertently forgotten. That process has highlighted the number of important projects in which the PBSD is currently involved, and the need to prioritize them so that the most important ones are accomplished as needed. The following are my thoughts. They are given to encourage the Board to think about priorities and develop your own priorities. 1. Clam Bay Dredging-This has to be the number one priority, and needs immediate attention. The PBSD has to have a seamless transition from the CZM/Foundation, and do the permitting/dredging project on as fast a track as possible.Anything else is unsatisfactory. 2. Solving the Copper Sulfate Problem -Although there is some time to fully solve this problem, it still has to have very high priority. The solution(s) are probably very complex, and will involve trying various ideas and then monitoring results. It also involves community communications and working closely with major abutting landowners. All that will take a huge effort from staff and the PBSD Board, and will not occur quickly. There is only 5 years to solve this problem. 3. Taking Over Various CZM/Foundation Functions - The intent is that PBSD step into roles that have recently been done by either CZM or the Foundation. Staff and the Board should spend time to make sure nothing slips through the cracks and consider if there are other additional functions that are needed. This will take time and effort over the next few months. 4. Tree Canopy/Pathway/Bike Lane Study- I think the timing of this project is most debatable. Its urgency has been diminished with the repaving of the Pelican Bay pathways. Although the study would be useful, it's immediate importance pales in comparison with the items above. Given it will take a lot of resources and staff/Board time, should you consider delaying most of this for a year or two?The pathways probably won't need work for a couple of years or more, and the County has now delayed the repaving schedule for the Boulevard to 2019 (and therefore the need to decide on possible bike paths). Maybe you should merely hire the arborist to provide status on the current health of the tree canopy and the best ways to maintain (and possibly enhance) the health of the trees, assuming no immediate pathway changes. The rest of the project can wait. 161 2A February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11a.New Business-Establish priorities and identify upcoming meetings Page 2 of 2 January 2,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 10. Setting Priorities(Keith J.Dallas) Page 2 of 2 Setting PBSD Priorities By Keith J. Dallas - Page 2 5. Ongoing Landscape Improvements - This almost falls into the normal maintenance mode. Each year staff will upgrade further sections of our landscape, as time and money allows. 6. Crosswalks - Hopefully a decision will be made at the January 2nd meeting regarding any modifications at the San Marino crosswalk. Hopefully that will also provide the direction for future crosswalks. Once that is decided, minimal effort will be needed deciding on when and where future crosswalks are built. 7. Repaving Pelican Bay Boulevard - The County has now said the Boulevard will not be repaved until Fiscal 2019. The Board will have to decide if that is acceptable, and if not what can practically be done. Although I agree the current road condition is cosmetically very poor, I personally would defer discussions of this until other items have been solved and you are sure of the PBSD's financial status. 8. Replacing Street Lighting -At some point the PBSD needs to hire an expert to advise you of the current state of the art of LED lighting, and update the cost estimates provided by Wilson Miller. The original study said the fixtures should be replaced in 4 to 7 years from now. However given the time needed to update the study, decide on a specific technology and look, and communicate to the community, a couple of years lead time is needed. Once staff and Board get beyond the current high priority issues, thought should be given to start the process and maybe do a demonstration project. It is my hope that the Board will start to discuss priorities at the January 2nd meeting. Anything that can be lowered in priority will give everyone more time to work on immediate issues. Keith February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session' 11b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Discussion Page 1 of 11 BAY COLONX ASS{ CI., L l` (general Manager. CEO Michael A.Nekor,c.-'t,t.<at Board of C;iovernors January 11, 2013 Kin I char;; Prr'uten' l)hn Beal l i<`e i'r a[nt t V Pelican Bay Services Division I I ti a,nl„n ,;/,,t<,,, c/o Neil Dorrill 1101)Mushkm 5672 Strand Court Suite 1 Naples, FL 34110 wN„• •,1,n,°i01r Let Palma Re: Beach Renourishment R n-v Ann Sharp 1 scan: Dear Neil. ( ``T" I am writing this letter to you on behalf of the Bay Colony Community Association, Inc. (.=I”"le'l'`I'pa`'M.1) ("BCCA"). BCCA was recently made aware of Collier County's plans to renourish the various Collier County beaches and is of the understanding that those plans do not include the I3`t"`"n "P,ir beaches adjacent to Pelican Bay(including Bay Colony). °"""' It was BCCA's understanding that Pelican Bay Services Division ("PBSD") historically paid for beach renourishment to the beaches from the Contessa condominium to a location fifteen The( hundred feet south of the Sandpiper Beach facilities. Further TDC Funds paid for beach 1),,,7 1 f renourishment from the Ritz to the Contessa. The last renourishment of these beaches sa occurred in 2006. BCCA was intbrmed that Collier County is relying on a study which i_l�.r l �I„r ,. showed that beaches adjacent to Pelican Bay have only lost a fraction of shoreline in i+,<t:_>t<.:ee, comparison to the various other beaches to be re-nourished. Notwithstanding the suggested Phi S.Germ un results of this study, the erosion that has occurred is not insignificant and because the County The Marque,/ is on a six-year cycle to re-nourish the beaches, the failure to renourish the Pelican Bay beaches at this time in connection with the County program could create a substantial hardship Roth l' n for Pelican Bay if that area is made to wait until the next cycle in 2019 -- 2020. As TDC Ler:4J k Nea,,:Il Funds are apparently not available, we would urge the Pelican Bay Services Division to act promptly to take such action as necessary in order to join the county process for the re- nourishment of the Pelican Bay beaches. Lk)u I)antwth We world appreciate an�r prompt rncnnnc? t?jS ��tl1 r i a t!^? gc we are advised that tlll?e is of the essence. I;It.I-nI YtiLz 1_a l'aixna Sincerely, nl (Ih-llua(+�u �• / Kim Rosenberg Ml et•A. Ni son. CCM,CAM President Chief Executive Officer cc James Hoppensteadt, President,Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. 8700 BAY COLONY DRIVE•NAPLES,FLORIDA 34108. 239.591.2202 • FAX 239-591-1685 • www.bay-colony.org . 16t -2-11-tkp t k cis c o N N c IX U O N u 0 yyq N O m }Lyy, Ea_ N N C O1 O O Na N a CO mrX E E Tu CO " CL co Ln u, M —O O N S IQ 11 N Ln N E CO g rr i i CC ti it 8$x° 8 8 u 8S'" P c c c o an s tU ft P Lfl L.,O\ C1 Ly, Ch. cc o o „ft a [§ o IQ G M -, C2 it u .-t ft' ft p g 7C E:3 8 g P VI G1 �} Q it &' ttl L O M 2 N r'O in NE LA N C}\ J E M .-- N r s a a v � ,g r : # t February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Beryls l6orIoard R r ion 11b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Discussion Page 3 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Division Board October 7,2005 Mrs.Johnson-Fogg stated,"1 don't think anyone will disagree with that". I am only brining this up because it has been a couple of years and nothing has happened. it is not going to go A away and somebody is going to have to deal with it. el w Mr. Carroll stated, 'We will get a letter off to the Foundation to find out their position on the issue". Mr. Sutphin stated, "I would suggest that you strongly demand a response by our next meeting". Mr.Charlie Manning-Grosvenor-"At the next meeting are you going to decide whether to add more money or stay with the$800,000 for beach renourishment"? Mr.Carroll replied,"No,that is a separate issue and I was about to bring that subject up". I think we ought to consider approving$160,000 to increase the amount of money to be spent on the beach renourishment. Mr.Domenie asked,'Where would we get the additional funds"? Mr. Sutphin replied, "Spend $350,000 on Oakmont Lake". That is a phony number to begin with. Mr. Carroll moved seconded by Mr. Sutphin and approved on a vote of 7/1 to increase the amount to be spend on beech renourishment by$160,000. Mr.laizzo cast the dissenting vote. Mr.laizzo asked,"We have$840,000 budgeted don't we"? Mr.Carroll replied,"Yes,now we have$1,000,000", Now we will be getting 36,000 cubic yards instead of 30,000 cubic yards of sand. Mr, laizzo stated,"Yes,but I don't know that it is necessary. Mr.Sutphin replied,"1 don't know that any of it is necessary". SYSTEM Ill&IV RETENTION AREA IMPROVEMENTS-TEST AREA Mr.Lukasz stated,"There is nothing new to report on this project". Mr. Domenie asked,'There are still some flags in the area,are you still planting"? Mr.Lukasz replied,'We still have some fern and Cord Grass to plant in that area". r,` r .. t238 fJ r I February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Se es vision Board Regular Session 11 b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Discussion Page 4 of 11 Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2006 Capital Projects Fund Clam Bay Restoration Program Appropriation Analysis: Clam Bay Operations&Maintenance Clam Bay Improvement Program(183805) Engineering(320-183805-631400-511051) 880,000 Restoration Consultant Services $80,000 The Clam Bay monitoring program includes biological, water quality and hydrographic analysis which is performed on an annual basis. Findings of these analyses are developed into an Annual Management Report used to identify any potential improvements in the restoration of the Clam Bay System.The fees being requested are for the consultant services necessary for these improvements. Also,included is 520 hours for biologist time to assist staff in the Clam Bay Restoration Program. Pelican Bay Beach Renourishment 50 This funding will allow PBSI)to participate in the permitting process with Collier County which will give the Pelican Bay community a cost effective option for beach reenourishment. Other Contractual Services(320-183804.634999-511051) 5870,000 Pelican Bay Beach Renourishment $840,000 These fees are the renourishment of Pelican Bay Beaches from the Contessa south to approximately 1,500 feet south of the Sandpiper Beach Facility.TDC will fund the beach renourishment from the Contessa north to the Ritz Carlton. Interior Tidal Channels $5,000 Fees arc being budgeted for the contractual services necessary for the construction of the Interior Tidal Channels. Cattail Enhancements&Plantings $25,000 These fees are for cattail replanting within the Clam Bay System. 64 6 r 13 2013 Pelican Bay ServicDi�715fon board Reg S15ssion February y 9 11 b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Discussion Page 5 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Division Board September 7,2005 Mr.McAlpin replied,it could be from the Ebb Tide Shoal,the Flood Tide Shoal or it could be truck hauled". That has to be worked out with the State. Mr.Mathias asked,"What happens from R-37 to Clam Pass at R-42"? Mr. McAlphin replied, 'When that was surveyed it was determined that portion of beach did not critically erode and did not require renourishment". Mr. Mathias stated,"There was an original bid of 63,000 cubic yards of sand from R-30 to R-37 according to this document,which may not be right". Mr. McAlphin replied, "Recognize that the area between R-30 and R-31, I am going to take care of". That is 30,000 cubic yards that I am going to pay for. The other 36,000 cubic yards you are going to pay for. Mr. Sutphin stated, "We have a habit of over-complicating simple issues". To me,this is very simple. The County has a plan, there are aspects of it that we don't like.but we don't have the ability to change the plan. We either play in the game for$840,000 or we wait eight years for the chance to play again. I have heard speeches, including one from Mr. laizzo, of how we don't listen to the residents. I guarantee you that an overwhelming percentage of Pelican Bay residents would shoot us if we would watch the beach erode. Mr. Charlie Manning - Grosvenor-'Why was it that the south beach was never in the original proposal and have you noticed that the south beach has eroded"? Mr. Domenie stated,It will come back". Mr.Carroll stated,"It moves back and forth". Mr. Sutphin moved seconded by Mr. Spinier and approved by a vote of tll2, that the Board approve the expenditure of the$840,000 that is in the budget for beach renourishment. Mr. Roeilig and Mr. Boland cast the dissenting votes. CLAM PASS INLET POLICY Mr. Burke stated, "A lot of time has been spent on Clam Pass Inlet". For the sake of the rest of the Board and the owners,the Pelican Bay Services Division has been responsible for the permits for the maintenance dredging of Clam Pass. We have done it in a manner to benefit the ri 6187 ff +-1 , February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Re lar ssion 11b. County's 2013 Beach Renouri e rog m Discu Page 6 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Division Board August 3,2005 postponed for one year. We have no idea whether or not the County is willing to spend the extra money that is indicated in the bids. Mr.Burke stated,"There are a lot of"ifs",but we feel that is our best position". Mr.Ward stated,"The question is,what you are going to do about the$172,000". Mr. Burke stated, "The feeling is that we could move funds around in the budget to accommodate the$172,000". Mr. Sutphin moved seconded by Mr. Roellig and approved unanimously that the Services Division express It's desire to continue to participate in the Beach Renourishment Project, subject to a final review when the County answers the as-yet unanswered questions. CLAM PASS INLET MANAGEMENT POLICY, Mr. Burke stated, "I was encouraged by some of the things that I heard from Mr. Humiston and others". Essentially, we are not in favor of dredging the ebb shoal. From what I gather from the discussions, if the County Inlet Sub-committee came up with a policy regarding Clam Pass that would dredge that shoal,they would have to go to the State to get an exception or modification to our permits. Our present permits govern that process. Mr. Sutphin stated, "Mr. Burke, I believe Mr. Humiston indicated they would need a new permit,which he very much doubted they would ever get from the State". Mr. Burke stated,'We are still going to move forward with the Inlet Resolution that we are going to provide to the County Commissioners". That has not been presented yet,has it? Mr.Ward replied,"No". Mr. Burke stated, "In effect, we are telling them that we are happy with the way we do it now and the bigger picture is Clam Bay". I felt good about what we discussed and what we heard. Mr. Carroll stated, "Mr. Lukasz mentioned that there are some changes to the Resolution". Mr.Ward replied,"Yes". 0 Ca 0 6151 ca February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session II 11b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishm n�gram Discussion Page 7 of 11 I 2 A Pelican Bay Services Division Board October 8,2004 Mr.Ward replied, I don't think you are ever closing the door". I think it is a good idea to put it on the table that is what we want to pay for and we will see how far up the flagpole that will fly. Mr. Burke moved, seconded by Mr. Werner and approved unanimously that we limit our participation In beach renourishment to $700,000 and that the scope of participation be limited to placing sand on the beach, not m or monitanin . SYSTEM iii AND IV BERM AND R ENTION ARE IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Burke stated, "The plan, as developed by Mr. Lukasz and Mr. Lieber and presented to us,allows the Pelican Bay Services Division to move forward with the System Ill&IV berm and retention work". Mr.Ward, I understand that you and the Foundation are working in getting the associations involved to do their part. The Clam Bay Sub-committee wanted to recommend that the full Board proceed with the plan as presented to us. Mr. Domenie asked,Is that the$75,000"? Mr.Carroll replied,$200,000". Mr. Domenic) stated, "The $200,000 covers re-strengthening of the berm on the west side". From what I can see,this part is$75,000. Mr.Ward replied, "No, I believe It is a$150,000 figure". it is$200,000 for this program, exclusive of our berm restoration work. Mr. Werner asked, "Do you still have the sheet from last month showing the break down"? Mr.Ward replied,"Not with me". Mr.Werner stated,"Mr.Domenie,I have the same memory as you'. Mr. Ward replied, "Mr. Lukasz has indicated that It Is $203,000 and includes the berm work". Mr.Burke moved,seconded by Mr. Rorilig and approved on a vote of tit to move forward with the System Ill and IV berm and retention area improvements as presented. Mr., MI=cast the dissenting vote, .-a 5874 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Discussion Page 8 of 11 1 6 I 2A Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2005 Capital Projects Fund Chun Bay Restoration Program Appropriation Analysis: Clam Bay Operations&Maintenance Clam Bay Improvement Program(183805) Engineering(320-183805-631400-511051) 580,000 Restoration Consultant Services $80,000 The Clam Bay monitoring program includes biological, water quality and hydrographic analysis which is performed on an annual basis. Findings of these analyses are developed into an Annual Management Report used to identify any potential improvements in the restoration of the Clam Bay System.The foes being requested are for the consultant services necessary for these improvements. Also,included is 520 hours for biologist time to assist staff in the Clam Bay Restoration Program. Pelican Bay Beach Renourishment $0 This funding will allow PBSD to participate in the permitting process with Collier County which will give the Pelican Bay community a cost effective option for beach renourishment Other Contractual Services(320-183805-634999-511051) $196,900 Pelican Bay Beach Renourishment $46,600 These fees are the renourishment of Pelican Bay Beaches from the Contessa south to approximately 1,500 feet south of the Sandpiper Beach Facility.TDC will fund the beach renourishment from the Contessa north to the Ritz Carlton, Interior Tidal Channels $150,000 Fees are being budgeted for the contractual services necessary for the construction of the Interior Tidal Channels. Clam Bay Plantings $300 These fees are for Mangrove replanting within the Clam Bay System. 64 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11 b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Dis si Page 9 of 11 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD MEETING 6 I June 2,2004 Mr. Sutphin moved seconded by Mr. Werner and approved unanimously to adjust the budget by reducing the flushing cuts to $150,000, removing the beach renourishment contingency in the amount of $140,000 and reduce the Operating Fund Balance to 3.5 months. Mr. Ward stated, "Because your Ordinance requires an affirmative vote on this Budget, I think your motion was to remove line items". I need you to approve the budget. Mr Werner moved seconded by Mr Domenie and approved unanimously by a vote of 10/0 to approve the Fiscal Year 2005 Bud•at subject to removal of the line items above". ADMINISTRATOR'S OVERVIEW Mr. Carroll asked,"Mr.Ward,have we agreed to resurfacing the tram berm"? Mr. Ward replied, "That is an approximate $40,000 expenditure to do that, which would be completely wasted money if we move forward with the removal of the cattails". Mr. Carroll stated, "That is a good point". Mr. Kinney we have money in the budget to spend$1,900,000 to scoop out all of the cattails to get rid of them. If the County buys that and it goes through they have to come up with the money,then we will be proceeding with that work. It we were to resurface the berm prior to the cattail removal it would be a waste of money. Would it be all right that we don't repave the berm for that reason until we resolve the other issue? Mr. Kinney asked, 'Would you know before the season began whether or not it was a go"? Mr.Ward replied,"Yes,we will probably know within sixty days". Mr. Burke asked, "At which County Commission meeting do the County Commissioner's approve our budget"? Mr. Ward replied, "We have to go before the Board of County Commissioners and ask them to set a Pubic Hearing date,which will probably be the second week of September". Ms. Sue Belanger - "At the intersection on Greentree Drive where you turn on to Gulf 4'r 4') Park Drive heading towards U.S 41, you can't find the street at night". The streetlight is 100'feet t; down the road and the palms have grown so tall that they really don't shed any light. Is there 0 T-1 a' 5784 1 • February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11 b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Discussion Page 10 of 11 A 000405 16 I 2 Collier County Beach Renourishment Bid No. 05-3854 Schedule of Bid Item s Bid Item No. Units Unit Price Subtotal • BASE BID–Construct Beach Fill Hydraulically 1. Mobilization/Demobilization 1 L.S. $2,329,057.00 $2,329,057.00 3. Payment and Performance Bond 1 L.S. $133,418.00 $133,418.00 Beach Fill 4. Dredge Sand from Borrow Area, Place and Grade at Vanderbilt Beach (R22.5- 95,337 C.Y. $24.09 $2,296,668.33 R31) 5. Dredge Sand from Borrow Area, Place and Grade at 59,812 C.Y. $27,14 $1,623,297.68 Pelican Bay(R31-R37) 6. Dredge Sand from Borrow Area, Place and Grade at 25,705 C.Y. $27.42 $704,831.10 North Park Shore(R43.5-R48) 7. Dredge Sand from Borrow Area, Place and Grade at 132,491 C.Y. $22.56 $2,988,996.96 Park Shore(R48-R54.5) 8. Dredge Sand from Borrow Area, Place and Grade at 312,049 C.Y. $26.06 $8,131,996.94 Naples Beach (R58A-R79) 9. Beach Tilling–Deleted Deleted Deleted Beach Fill Subtotal $ 15,745,791.01 Environmental Monitoring 10. Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor P1, 1 L.S $8,243.00 $8,243.00 Pumpout& Booster Locations 11. Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor P2, 1 L.S $8,243.00 $8,243.00 Pumpout& Booster Locations 12. Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor P3, 1 L.S $8,243.00 $8,243.00 Pumpout& Booster Locations 13. Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor P4. 1 L.S $0.00 $0.00 Pumpout& Booster Locations 14. Turbidity Monitoring 1 L.S. $170,058.00 $170,058.00 Environmental Monitoring Subtotal _ $194,787.00 Offshore Sea Turtle Monitoring(Hopper Dredge only) • 15. Mobilization/Demobilization Turtle 1 Event $3,642.00 $3,642.00 Trawler 16. Relocation Trawling 5 Day $3,500.00 $17,500.00 17. Endangered Species Observer 1 L.S $52,117.00 — $52,117.00 Sea Turtle Trawling Subtotal $73,259.00 I I BASE BID–TOTAL $ 18,476,312.01 February 13,2013 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11 b. County's 2013 Beach Renourishment Program Discussion • Page 11 of 11 16 1 2 A Collier County Pelican Bay Services Division Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2004 Capital Projects Fund Clam Bay Restoration Program Appropriation Analysis: Clam Bay Improvement Program Pelican Bay Beach Renourishment 510.000 This funding will allow PBSD to panicipate in the permitting process with Collier County which will give the Pelican Bay community a cost effective option for beach renourishment. interior Tidal Channels 510.000 Consultant fees necessary for the surveying,design and services during construction of interior tidal channels.These interior tidal channels are constructed to drain stormwater from low lying areas within Clam Bay where this condition is causing stress to the mangroves. Other Contractual Services(320483805-634999-0) $182,000 Hydrographic Improvements S152,000 These fees are the construction of the improvements identified in the Clam Bay Hydrographic Study, Interior Tidal Channels $20,000 Fees are being budgeted for the contractual services necessary for the construction of the Interior Tidal Channels. Clam Bay Plantings S 10,000 These fees arc for Mangrove replanting within the Clam Bay System, Other Fees and Charges: Tax Collector:(133-959050-930700) 51,200 Fora are based on Fiscal Year 2004 assessments to be collected, The Tax Collector charges three(3)percent of the assessments collected. Property Appraiser (133-959050.930600) S800 Fees are based on Fiscal Year 2004 assessments levied.The Property Appraiser charges two percent(2%)of the amount levied. Revenue Reserve(133-919010-489900) $2,000 The Board of County Commissioners policy and State Law requires the Division to appropriate 95%of estimated revenues,which will cover discounts and non-payment of assessments r.. Total Other Fees&Charges: $4,000 Total Appropriations: 5461,100 64 cifere71,. Sf,tfil1k(44111, 1 Sd:1•••••4 4i6.1 2. ( lif.... . ..,...,_. . . ...... .. . _. . .. illi - sc. ..... 1k. . .. N. . - ---'.',._ -..,,,----N. -• t 4.. .. 41r . . ' . . • i '''-.1, _....,..0- I 1 • to . - • I 1 1 ' . . -- -' • . * . - ' 3".. '\.■.). , 4F4 .. . 4 . ik ■ orr,..N,Stt -1 ... ...„.. :C ,,• 11 4 ii I 1 . . •;., Ft.. -ow'1. 11'.;"..':IL') , ,-. -N..t# /".) • i- '- i- # . , r-..• , 4c - '' .- \ --7 • : iootzic . . I . ...... \ , . , '•tI;;.', ' 700 .• ... feet GO Ogle earth 200 A nneters , , ■ ,-- -' • ........ .•A. • -77,- ,-,-.--,i SILT ... . . ..,. . , . .._ / , - 1 -1'.,,, ..... • *• • I .47:...•,...„...,:;-:•,„1: ,.. —* 104) Is , , 0.-- Abv; t7dIP Zok- e.,..,,.... 41 . . a k . - Is • - . - '7 A ..... ,L---- - .. .# ......M. I ... ,-, - , .. .,,-.. • a• ,..,. . . 4 ,,. f 1,., . , / t .. , / ..,,. .4:,.... ,._-:• ,„ . / . 1 — - Lo I ij C ' O N ' ° t z t a n o O C LA n rD • ,= r a , D- FIT(D lQ Z • ' ••••• -'' ••: ".r '. :14;C'''': 1 0 N O �` 'ta �, > -. CC tA ll! !. x In O ,• '; yt 0 __ Q ,.% fi t .. 3z t - r . m " ' " ' --,, 'f-'1•:)!i';'!"7.: .'4., , ,,,, ,,,.„,.. , 4 ,„„•,,,,,,,,,......„.. •. . .,. . _• ._ __, . .,....„,,,,,...,., ....,. . IA '''''' s , .s n < a .O N Q r C (gy a+= Y. e z 4i r ` '" '� "� a'` � e*.,�. Prat 'C3 Q- ' ,w, � � A of !p � � '+� '� rSt II 14 n +i, 3 i .. ,. ..� r '� 0 :-40,, t .) • t ' °?* a r ,n x. ,,_,.. ,i-:.„,,,, „, ,t.--..i.,k,,,,...,- . , - O 3 '° ,--1.::: .' . ,, ' _A n r+ z Cr , Aisito;,,,f....„ , „,, , * - job- .„; , • ' *'''".',# '••; .'t ,•4''''' 'CD ors „. iiiii,A, �d � ? 161 2A / OLOZ/8L/SO slaw ..lowE rift r •apuea9 saldeN ay1.4o 1.uawaaJ6e/6u!pue}saapun i.uawa6euew pue suoi1.eJado ywiM uol}aunfuoa ui auop aq paau IIIM i.uawanoadwi siyl :6upuanbas •slueuanoJ Ae8 ueJIlad aya Aq paainbaa se IIeM Gip.40 6uivaaias adeDspuel ayT apnpul pue awg.al6uis e 1.e paluawaidwi aq o1.sl 1Dafoad siyl :6uiseyd 0017"ZS $ :1.sop egoad uoiuidp •apuea9 saldeN aye�o Hem)laop aainaas pill wag.ssoa)e Hem aalaaeq/aalawuad snonuq.uoa e se walsAs sdea/suwnloa pue IleM hued aa.aaauoa 1.sepaad 1004 e ppy:uoilnlos anhewa1ly 00L"Z9 $ :lsoj aigegoid 4o uoiuidp •apueap saldeN a I.4o Hem Top aDinaas ail way.ssore Hem aaweq/aalawuad snonui1.uoa e se walsRs sdea/suwnloa pue Hem laued alaaauoa 1.seaaad 1004 e ppy:1.uawanoadwl pasodoad •p!gdea6 Aprils IIeM aalawuad Al.idipuaaas aauaaa4.aa)A4!dipuaaas aye o1. papwsue4.-aa JO eaie food aye 01.as!ou apunoq a1eulwila 01. Hem aya.40 aps apuea9 saldeN aye. uo s1uaw1.eaa1.DQQsnoae y1.IM • 6uole au!!Alaadoad uowwoa apueag saldeN pue Aid!puaaas aye 6uole aauaeq/aalawuad e ppy :a-sa •uoi1as sm. ui papuawwoDaa s1.uawanoadwi Jaw.o gip\ uoipunfuoD ui auop aq 01 paau ll!M 1.uawanoadw!siyl :6upuanbas _n •awq.auo paile1.su!aq ueD pue yl6ual pue adops uw paliwil Si pafojd s!q :6uisegd OOS'LL8"L $ :1.soj algegoad 4.0 uoiuldp eaae wiaq I2uo!lfppe aye adeDspuel-aa CD pue wiaq S!LI.dole Hem Mau aql aDeld :au!‘ paled )ied p00Ma6pid/Lip sn ay1.40 eaae awes aye ui „08 in wnwi(ew e To wiaq lios 1.y6lay paliwll meld :uoi1nlos aniwewally 00S"ES6'L $ :lsop algegoad 4o uolurdp •eaae wiaq puoi1.ippe a1e6ual pue adeaspuel-at pue eaae wiaq Mau sm.dole anoge pa1ou Hem laved a1.aaauoa Mau aud. Ile1sui —apis 117-Sf1 aye uo 6ui1.ueld Mau in „vS O1 do aaeld pue apls a)ielplaed aye uo IIeM 6uluielaa uapooM e Ile�sul :1.uawanoadwi pasodoad s' •a lei 1.uawa6euew aa1.eM au,1 puoAaq )Jed aAIJQ pooMa6pld aL[.4o pua twos aye. wiaq 1_ybiaq aye anoadwl :J-ga Ell ,.... ,, „.,.,.... ._...,..... ,:-... ,....,,, .... .„. .,,I, , lc 1_� a� s „,,. ...,, ._, , 2 . .. ..„ . , ';'&° � ti r 0 ' a ' ' ''''''V V41'',' a ::,,N,.,„„ , , .. . ,.0 . .„ .,. . .... , . a - .. '.. y ik � ' y a z. T.� #q sdir r R , R r°i • q v.. , r. ,t m,, v� 3.I B HY ttrot.sibliii t, —v. , , • s x 4 u � d h — �p + 'r d r Y§ i • -::'''."•,,,:-'t ,p }r7 t� 41-..-;:r,.. . , ' jk i,..-,, : - It'ilk4, . f „ t A rya€: t �+.- ;;ii. Rq c '''', • • . .--,,,ir . '. .: 11,--y- . • ''''ill.' ''''17. '-'' .1'41 "":.'.''. ''*' '1!''''' 4t.'*'...:itti '4 r�qy a '„. _ { d4� 9 e+ n� u N, n, - w A ' .• 'it 1...3 14,,.. s gam.. 0 x k �P .. � fir. ,. �r r { 161 2A Dr Gerry Sparkes From: "Mark Brice!"<mark_bricel @bricel.ca> Date: May-29-08 2:26 PM To: "'Dr Gerry Sparkes"'<shampers @nbnet.nb.ca>;<glsparkes @ntezero.net> Cc: <gillupton @aol.com>; <jquinn4l @comcast.net>;<RMasi@luxuryresorts.com> Subject: RE: NAPLES GRANDE/PELICAN BAY NEIGHBORS COMMITTEE MEETING.doc Hello Gerry, Referring to your e-mail of May 10tk as the owner of the Unit 603 Serendipity Dr.for over 16 years I want to give you full support in your efforts to make the management of Naples Grande Hotel realize the problems of the exorbitant noise caused by their refrigeration units,delivery trucks, back dock loading areas unloading and loading all kinds of materials incl. bottles, cans,glass,garbage etc. The Collier County Noise Control Ordinance for residential area,sets the limits for noise level during the night and day hours. It is quite obvious that Naples Grande Hotel is responsible for any infringement of the rules and regulations. Due to the fact that we as Residents of The Pelican Bay,paying the yearly fees and Collier County Taxes have all the rights to enjoy our properties under normal and tolerable circumstances. In the event that this is not the case(our example), it is responsibility of Collier County, Pelican Bay Foundation and The Serendipity Condo Association to take all necessary actions to enforce the rules and regulations. In my opinion the management of the Previous Registry Hotel and now Naples Grande Hotel haven't done anything to minimize the unbearable noise and to abide by the rules of Collier County. Our main concern is frequent terrible banging of the very huge containers of garbage and other material when dropped or loaded onto a truck and of course steady noise of the refrigeration units standing between the Hotel and our 4 units building. A diplomatic approach is recommendable, however,we have to see a progress in the right direction. I believe that a time limit should beset,as otherwise the present unacceptable situation will continue to no end in sight. Moreover,the market value of our units has been seriously affected,consequently we have actually suffered damages in six digits figures. Let's hope that the management of the Naples Grande Hotel will acknowledge the above mentioned facts and that this matter can be solved on an amicable basis. With best regards, Mark From: Dr Gerry Sparkes[mailtoshampers @nbnet.nb.ca] Sent: Saturday, May 10,2008 3:51 PM To: Mark&Lilo Bricel Subject: Fw: NAPLES GRANDE/PELICAN BAY NEIGHBORS COMMITTEE MEETING.doc Hi Marko As you can see from these 2 e-mails,the president of Pelican Bay Foundation has this Mr.John Quinn chairing this committee who wishes input. I think we must make this group aware that we are constantly affected by this service entrance noise both day&night which has been ongoing for many, many years without any definitive attempts at solution. 19/11/2009 Page 1 of 6 Marie & Gerry S arkes 161 ! 'f 9 rY P From: "Hunter Hansen"<Hunter.Hansen @waldorfastoria.com> Date: December-27-12 5:11 PM To: "Margie&Gerry Sparkes"<glsparkes @embargmail.com> Cc: "James Hoppensteadt"<jimh @pelicanbay.org> Subject: RE:Naples Grand(Waldorf Astoria)/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Mr. Sparkes, Thank you for your note and I certainly understand your concern. It was my understanding that this noise issue was resolved with the changed times of deliveries to the Hotel. Jim Hoppensteadt and I have worked together on a number of issues and I will make a point to liaise with him next week to discuss the best solution for all of us. We'll be back to you with our thoughts. Kind regards, Hunter Hunter H. Hansen Managing Director Waldorf Astoria Hotels and Resorts WALDORF L ASTO R IA' NAPLLS A WAE CCW MI-MIA !GTLL 475 Seagate Drive Naples, FL 34103 T: (239)594 6001 M: (239)300 8800 F: (239) 597 3128 hunter.hansen @waldorfastoria.com apt. WALDORF EXTRAORDINARY PLACES. sT07 IA" A SINC ETI_ R EXPERIENCE. From: Margie&Gerry Sparkes [mailto:glsparkes@embarqmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:15 PM To: Hunter Hansen Cc: Armstrong Mr Harry(Monk); Hulme at 541 Serendipity Geoff&Glenys; Luscherc Christina; Martino Al &Jan; Hoppensteadt Jim Subject: Fw: Naples Grand (Waldorf Astoria)/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Dear Mr Hansen (with apologies for the previous e-mail sent in error this AM), This significant noise issue affecting Serendipity residents continues without any significant change except for the 10/02/2013 Page 2 of 6 161 2A 6c/ controls on hours of operation.As per the previously forwarded documentation, the Wilson Miller master plan for Pelican Bay looked at this issue, thanks to the initiative of Mr Jim Hoppensteadt and recommended a 12 foot sound absorbing wall on the edge of the parking, truck turning area on hotel property. This plan, we believe is the only definitive plan on a go forward basis to address this issue. We continue to hope that you and your Company will address this issue to benefit your residential neighbours. Gerry Sparkes From: Margie&Gerry Sparkes Sent: Monday,April 23, 2012 3:02 PM To: Donna Cox Cc: Hansen Hunter ; Armstrong Mr Harry(Monk) ; Hulme at 541 Serendipity Geoff&Glenys ; Luscherc Christina ; Martino Al&Jan ; Hoppensteadt Jim Subject: Re: Naples Grand/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Just a note to say we appreciate your very positive response. Finding a definitive solution"to eliminate the noise as much as possible"is all that we ask. Having your new engineer address the issue and find a long term solution is music to our ears!! Thank you, thank you, keep us posted. Gerry Sparkes From: Donna Cox Sent:Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:15 AM To: glsparkes@ embargmail.com Subject: RE: Naples Grand/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Dear Mr. Sparkes, Thank you for taking the time to write to Mr. Hansen regarding some concern with some noise resonating from our properties loading dock,and the concerns you along some residents have. Mr. Hansen is on vacation as I type this note to you but he did receive your email and asked that I respond on his behalf. We do have a new Engineer on property Jacob Attallah, and Mr. Hansen along with Jacob, our Security and Other Teams, will do all we can to eliminate the noise as much as we can and provide a quieter environment for you and your residents. Donna V. Cox Executive Assistant Waldorf Astoria,Naples WALDORF ASTO R IA 475 Seagate Drive Naples,FL 34103 Telephone (239) 594-6002 Fax(239) 597-7168 Donna.Cox�a waldorfastoria.com 10/02/2013 Page 3 of 6 A4 A '4 EXTRAORDINARY PLACES. A SINGULAR EXPEW CE. WALDORF ASTO?IA' THE ANSWER IS "YES"WHAT'S THE QUESTION... From: "Margie& Gerry Sparkes" <glsparkes @embargmail.com> To: "Hunter Hansen" <Hunter.Hansen@waldorfastoria.com> Cc: "Hoppensteadt Jim" <iimh@,pelicanbay.org>, "Armstrong Mr Harry(Monk)" <harrvarmstrong 181(c�mnail.com>, "Hulme at 541 Serendipity Geoff& Glenys" <geoffreyhulme@,yahoo.co.uk>, "Luscherc Christina" <shoesinc@aol.com>, "Martino Al & Jan" <jandmar@comcast.net> comcast.net> Subject: Fw: Naples Grand/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Mr. Hunter Hansen Serendipity Condominium Association members continue to be troubled re the noise issue from the commercial dock at the back of the Hotel. We appreciate your previous efforts to place controls on the timing of when trucks are off loading but for a number of Serendipity owners,the frequent burst of noise when metal frames are dropped,the beeping of vehicles when in reverse and the amphitheatre like design of the service bay continues to be of great annoyance to Serendipity residents. Mr. Jim Hoppenstaedt has been on site personally and very kindly arranged to have an assessment done as part of the master plan work for Pelican bay by Wilson Miller consultants (the above attachements are included). You may have been copied as part of the original distribution of this document. As a member of the Serendipity Condominium Association Board, & because of my previous involvement in this issue, I have been asked to write you and seek your help. We have not placed any requests with you and the Naples Grand over the last couple of years realizing the down turn of tourism/market etc. but now with the gradual improvement in the tourism market and with the new affiliation with the Waldorf Astoria we are asking that you consider giving this issue due attention. Your"neighbourly"consideration of facilitating a solution to this long standing issue would be most appreciated. Thank You in advance Gerry Sparkes Secretary, Serendipity Condominium Association,Representative to Pelican Bay Presidents Council 10/02/2013 Page 4 of 6 From: < > 1 6 ( (f m:James Hoppensteadt mailto:pmh @pehcanbay.org I Sent: Friday,January 08, 2010 5:22 PM To:Margie& Gerry Sparkes<mailto:glsparkes @embargmail.com> Cc: Cinadr Donna<mailto:donna537@embargmail.com> ; Gill Lee<mailto:GillUpton @aol.com> ; Smith Joanne<mailto:joanne525(&,,comcast.net> ; Lisa Warren<mailto:lwarren @pelicanbay.org> ; Kevin Mangan<mailto:KevinMangan@a,wilsonmiller.com> ;Hunter Hansen mailto:Hunter.Hansen @hilton.com> Subject:RE:Naples Grand/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Dr. Sparkes, Attached is a picture of the property line between the Naples Grande and Serendipity. I do not have a problem with the Foundation continuing to explore this with Wilson Miller for a general wall solution—placement& estimated cost. At least we'll all know more about what we're dealing with. Sincerely, Jim Hoppensteadt President Pelican Bay Foundation 6251 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples,FL 34108 239-596-6180 ext. 223 239-597-6927 fax From:Margie& Gerry Sparkes [mailto:glsparkes @embargmail.coml Sent: Friday,January 08,2010 9:10 AM To: James Hoppensteadt Cc: Cinadr Donna; Gill Lee; Smith Joanne; Lisa Warren;Kevin Mangan Subject: Re:Naples Grand/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Dear Mr. Hoppenstaedt, Thank you for your very rapid response and your initiative to ask Wilson Miller to look at the problem. This request for costing of such a project will give us a basis for discussion on how to accomplish this task. Like you,we at Serendipity would have a number of questions on 1: exactly where the wall should be located, (my knee jerk response would be right at the edge of the hotel's pavement which I think would place it on the hotel's property as the current land elevations would give the maximum benefit the closer it is to the hotel). 2: What steps could be taken to preserve the tree line along our road to initially minimize the visual impact of the wall until new tree plantings along our side of the wall were in place for camouflage,this would be key to having association support from an aesthetic perspective. 3: The financial issue is one that, I think, will need a round table discussion with The Foundation, The Naples Grand and Serendipity Association. Serendipity is the victim in this design "error" when Pelican Bay was designed. The Hotel also when designed probably didn't see the the use of commercial dumpsters needing to be parked at the edge of our property or freezer trailers parked for weeks with compressors running for food storage. So to answer your last question, I think Serendipity can develop a position once we are given the proposed plan and costing by Wilson Miller. Again many thanks for anticipating our needs and asking for the consultants to have a look at our problem,much appreciated. Gerry Sparkes 10/02/2013 Page 5 of 6 From: James Hoppensteadt<mailto jimh elicanba .org> (c1 @p Y n 16 12 A Sent: Thursday,January 07, 2010 4:57 PM To: Margie& Gerry Sparkes<mailto:glsparkes @embargmail.com> Cc: Cinadr Donna<mailto:donna537Aembargmail.com> ; Gill Lee<mailto:GillUpton @aol.com> ; Smith Joanne<mailto:joanne525 @comcast.net> ;Lisa Warrenmailto:lwarren(ll pelicanbay.org> ; Kevin Mangan mailto:KevinMangan @wilsonmiller.com> • Subject: RE:Naples Grand/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Dr. Sparkes, Thank you for your email, and Happy New Year. I think the wall and technology you reference would probably be a good solution to your noise issues. In fact,I had asked the planners from Wilson Miller to go over and take a look at the area. They indicated they also think the wall would be the best noise attenuation solution. There are a couple of challenges 1)the existing landscaping between the two properties would be completely(or mostly all) removed during the excavation of that area for the wall footers, and 2) this is private property (it looks to be Serendipity's). So the questions we would have to grapple with are 1)is this something the overall association would support - aesthetically?, and 2) who would pay for the wall (financial support)? By copy of this, I will ask Wilson Miller for an order of magnitude on the cost. Once you have that, can you determine Serendipity's position on these two items, and we can see if we can find some way forward? Sincerely, Jim Hoppensteadt President Pelican Bay Foundation 6251 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples,FL 34108 239-596-6180 ext. 223 239-597-6927 fax From:Margie& Gerry Sparkes 1mailto:glsparkesc embargmail.coml Sent: Thursday,January 07,2010 4:28 PM To: James Hoppensteadt Cc: Cinadr Donna; Gill Lee; Smith Joanne Subject:Naples Grand/Serendipity Commercial Residential Interface Dear Mr. Hoppensteadt First of all, a sincere thank you for being willing to have the Foundation participate in finding a solution to our longstanding noise issue. I read with keen interest under the Community Improvement Plan, the Dec 9 2009 Wilson Miller Pelican Bay 100%Base Data phase 1 Report detailed information re noise control for residents who live along the 41. On page 23 Sec 1:21,re sound attenuation the consultants provide data re noise control using a product called LITE-FORM. This is an insulating concrete form with both sound reflective and sound absorbing properties.No doubt you have had detailed briefings on such products. I think I speak for a significant number of Serendipity residents when I suggest that any consideration of planning for such a structural barrier between us and the Naples Grand as part of the Pelican Bay Master plan would be most appreciated. Thank you again for being willing to listen to us. 10/02/2013 Page 6 of 6 Dr Gerry Sparkes 1 6 I 2 A 605 Serendipity Drive Naples,Fl 34108 239 594 5623 This transmission is not a digital or electronic signature and cannot be used to form,document,or authenticate a contract.Hilton and its affiliates accept no liability arising in connection with this transmission.Copyright 2012 Hilton Worldwide Proprietary and Confidential 10/02/2013 Lie • 1313 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD %%0°% SI CANDIDATE: JOHN M. VISOSKY 6 1 2 A RESIDENCE: ST. TROPEZ CONDOMINIUM, HERON POINT DRIVE OFFICE HELD: PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR 9 YEARS NAPLES RESIDENT: 43 YEARS FAMILY: WIFE SALLY AND FIVE CHILDREN EDUCATION: BA, MA, AND Ph.D DEGREES, ALL FROM UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT: ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESPONSIBILITIES: RECRUTING AND HIRING INSTRUCTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL AT UNIVERSITIES THROUGHOUT THE U.S. PARTICIPATED IN THE BUILDING OF MULTIPLE SCHOOLS TO ACCOMMODATE 38,000 STUDENTS. SUBMITTED COMPETITIVE GRANTS TO FLORIDA STATE GOVERNMENT AND U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON, D.C. OBTAINING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SUPPLEMENTAL DOLLARS OVER AND ABOVE STATE FUNDING. ALL FUNDING HIGHLY AUDITED AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL. AT THE REQUEST OF THE FLORIDA STATE DEPARTMENT, I TESTIFIED BEFORE A U.S. SENATE SUB-COMMITTEE ON THE MERITS OF TITLE ONE,A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL PROGRAM. REASON FOR CANDIDACY: KNOWING THE PBSD MUST WORK WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, BOTH NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, AS WELL AS THE PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION BOARD, IT MUST BE FIRM AND DILIGENT IN ITS RECOMMENDATIONS. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CONCERNS THAT MUST BE ADDRESSED BUT IT MUST BE DONE WHILE CONSIDERING THE MOOD AND WILL OF PELICAN BAY RESIDENTS, AND MUST BE PRATICAL AND FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE. I LOVE THIS BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITY OF PELICAN BAY AND AM CONFIDENT I CAN CONTRIBUTE TO ITS FURTHER IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT. Final corrected 2-8-13 Sierra Club Calusa Group Concerns on NWP 27&Section 404/10 Clam Pass Permits �kik Al 1,0 ` el 2/13/13 10:53 AM 161 2Att24 ' I'3 2-08-13 Sierra Club Calusa Group Concerns on NWP 27&Section 404/10 Clam Pass Permits Sierra Club Calusa Group(Sierra Calusa)advocates holistic management of the Clam Pass-Clam Bay Natural Resources Protection Area(NRPA)Preserve to retain the natural contours and conditions of Clam Pass and its intertidal brackish creeks and lagoons to the greatest extent possible as these C MigAi characteristics are fundamental to sustaining habitats for indigenous and migrating listed and unlisted species and passive recreation enjoyed by thousands of visitors annually. We appreciate the Board of • County Commissioners recent affirmation to manage the Clam Pass-Clam Bay NRPA to preserve and protect its natural resources(mixed mangroves-seagrass-tidal flats-shallows-beach-dune-scrub-marsh)as an integrated whole. This special coastal aquatic area/wetlands preserve is a rare complete coastal barrier system of fish spawning/nursery,marine mammal foraging,sea turtle nesting,gopher tortoise,multi- species bird foraging/resting/roosting,and small mammals habitats. Sierra Calusa supports use of NWP 27 for a onetime project to restore Clam Pass and its adjacent shoreline from severe weather damage of October-December of 2012 that resulted in its closure over a short period of time. We agree with the Corps staff that NWP 27 would be appropriate to expedite authorization to restore Clam Pass and its immediately adjacent shoreline by mechanical excavation to remove sand which washed and migrated into the pass and then dispose of that sand by using it to repair its shoreline that was damaged from the same weather conditions that caused pass closure.However, Sierra Calusa is very concerned that the onetime project to reopen Clam Pass has been unnecessarily complicated by a construction plan that far exceeds simply restoring Clam Pass. We are concerned that the submitted materials do not conform to criteria for a NWP 27 due to the applicant including a complete new maintenance dredging plan to enlarge dredging Clam Pass to Outer Clam Bay and removal of 20,000+cu. yards of sand for a nonadjacent beach area. We respectfully object to the applicant's attempt to use a NWP 27 to gain a Corps authorization for either a completely new Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Plan or revised 2009-2010 Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Plan which is already a high profile proposed project that warrants a higher not lesser level of review by the Corps. Since the 2009-10 proposed maintenance dredging plan has unresolved conflicts evidenced by 100+letters and emails,nearly 3,000 petition signatures, forums/meetings with USACE and NDEP staff,and correspondence from an attorney representing local environmental conservation interests-we urge the Corps to acknowledge the high degree of public concern that recently prompted the county to transfer responsibility for permitting and assure the public that Clam Pass will not be dredged to mine sand from it for beach projects,will not be dredged for navigation purposes,and will only be dredged for the health of the mangroves ecosystem We pray the Corps concurs with us that the Conservation NGOs participation will benefit Clam Pass permitting. * Sierra Calusa respectfully requests the Corps approve a NWP 27 for a onetime project to restore Clam Pass Segments A and B(stations 0+00 to 6.60)in a manner that doesn't exceed the last Corps permit SAJ 199602789(IP-CC)widths and depths and exclude from NWP 27 items 1-4 listed below and to require a Public Notice of these items for Sec.404/10 Individual Permit as a new Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Plan or as substantial added modifications to the already high profile 2009-2010 Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Plan: 1) Clam Pass channel depicted to extend 400 feet westward into the Gulf of Mexico in/near known offshore productive high relief hard bottom with sponges,soft corals and other important aquatic habitat. 2) 1/2 foot over-dredge added to maximize sand taken for beaches renourishment contrary to stated intent. 3) Excavation of Clam Pass Segment B substantially wider as nearly shoreline to shoreline dredging plan that reduces existing benthos,jeopardizes mangrove root stability and conflicts with restoration intent. 4)Excavation of Clam Pass Segment C to greater widths ininear seagrasses areas that is counterproductive to desirable reestablishment of seagrasses between Clam Pass and Outer Clam Bay ecosystem restoration. Thank you for your public service and response to public interest for improved Clam Pass permit outcomes Bobbie Lee Gruninger,Sierra Club Calusa Group Chairwoman *Follow up for Sierra Club Calusa Group will be done by Co-Conservation Chairwoman Marcia Cravens