The URL can be used to link to this page

CAC Agenda 09/11/2014 Coastal Advisory Committee Agenda September 11 , 2014 Meeting Agenda and Notice COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE(CAC) THURSDAY,SEPTEMBER 11,2014 -1:00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS THIRD FLOOR, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES • Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions • 2014 CAC MEETING DATES I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda V. Public Comments VI.Approval of CAC Minutes 1.June 12, 2014 VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report 2. Critical Erosion Designation by FDEP for North Park Shore * Backup E-mail 3. Historical Beach Information 4. Beach Standard Width vs. Vegetation Width 5. AUIR Submittals 6. 15 Year Permit Status FDEP/USACE * FDEP * FDEP Meeting Notes August 6, 2014 * USACE 7. FY 14/15 Naples Beach * Grant Funded Invitation to Bid * Naples Beach Renourishment Bid Schedule * Atkins Request for FDEP NTP * Exhibit I: Supplemental Terms and Conditions FEMA 97.036 Provisions * Exhibit J Technical Specifications 14-6343-Naples Beach Renourishment * Exhibit K: Permits * Exhibit L: Standard Details * City of Naples Truck Haul Routes 2104 Beach Renourishment * E-mail regarding: Notice to Proceed Submittal for Naples Beach 0222355-001-JC 8. PW 2700 First Appeal Decision 9. PW 2700 Second Appeal 10. FEMA Deobligation Reconciliation 11. FDEP Cost Share 13/14 Beach Renoruishment 12. LG FR 2015/2016 * Collier County Beach Nourishment Project * South Marco Island Beach Renourishment 13. Marco Island Central Beach Re-grade 14. Beach Survey's 15. Marco South Beach Renourishment VIII. New Business 1. Deobligation Peer Review-Atkins * Backup Material 2. Deobligation Support-CP&E * Backup Material 3. Peer Review Wiggins Pass/Historical Data -CP&E * Backup Material 4. Doctors Pass Jetty Rebuild * Proposal * Contract IX. Old Business X.Announcements XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date/Location October 9, 2014-Government Center, 3rd Floor XIII.Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing,to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gail D. Hambright at (239) 252-2966. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities(including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Anthony P. Pires, Jr., Esq., Chairman Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee FROM: Colleen M. Greene, Assistant County Attorne L41(s- DATE: March 18,2010 RE: Sunshine Law and Agenda question The issue presented is whether the Sunshine Law requires that an agenda be made available prior to board meetings. In summary,the answer is no. The Sunshine Law Manual(2009 Ed. Vol. 31)provides the following: The Attorney General's Office recommends publication of an agenda, if available, in the notice of the meeting;. if an agenda is not available, subject matter summations might be used. However, the courts have held that the Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency provide notice of each item to be discussed via a published agenda. Such a specific requirement has been rejected because it could effectively preclude access to meetings by members of the general public who wish to bring specific issues before a governmental body. See Hough v. Stembridge, 278 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). And see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (posted agenda unnecessary; public body not required to postpone meeting due to inaccurate press report which was not part of the public body's official notice efforts). Thus, the Sunshine Law has been interpreted to require notice of meetings, not of the individual items which may be considered at that meeting. However, other statutes, codes or ordinances may impose such a requirement and agencies subject to those provisions must follow them. Accordingly, the Sunshine Law does not require boards to consider only those matters on a published agenda. "[W]hether to impose a requirement that restricts every relevant commission or board from considering matters not on an agenda is a policy decision to be made by the legislature." Law and Information Services, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 670 So. 2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Today's Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee was properly noticed in compliance with the Sunshine Law on or about February 1, 2010. Further, the agenda for today's meeting was also publically noticed on the County's website on Monday, March 15, 2010. The related back-up materials for the agenda were supplemented and available on the County's website on Wednesday, March 17, 2010. In addition, a number of these materials also appeared on the agenda for the Coastal Advisory Committee meeting on Thursday, March 11, 2010. In my opinion, there is no violation of the Sunshine Law and no legal issue regarding the date the agenda was published. cc: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Co fier County Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation Natural Resources MEMORANDUM TO: CAC Board Members FROM: Gail Hambright,Accountant DATE: December 10, 2013 SUBJECT: 2014 CAC Scheduled Meetings Please mark your calendar for the following 2013 CAC scheduled meeting dates: January 9, 2014 February 13, 2014 March 13,2014 April 10, 2014 May 8, 2014 June 12, 2014 July 10, 2014 August 14, 2014 September 11, 2014 October 9, 2014 November 13, 2014 December 11,2014 All meetings will be held in the Board of County Commissioner's chambers,third floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, unless otherwise noted. A public notice will be sent out before each meeting. 414.%:',9-252 www rØ , CAC September 11,2014 Approval of Minutes VI-1 1 of 5 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, June 12, 2014 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Jim Burke VICE CHAIRMAN: Robert Raymond (Excused) John Sorey, III Joseph A. Moreland (Excused) Victor Rios Nick Penniman (Excused) Debbie Roddy Robert Brown Ian Butler ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney Gail Hambright, Accountant Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples CAC September 11,2014 Approval of Minutes VI-1 2 of 5 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online. I. Call to Order Mr. Sorey called the meeting to order at 1:00PM II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Chairman Burke arrived at 1:02pm IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 6—0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. May 8,2014 Mr. Rios moved to approve the minutes of the May 8, 2014 meeting as submitted. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 6—0. VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report The Committee reviewed the "Collier County Tourist Tax Revenue FY 14 TDC Revenue Report" dated through May 31, 2014. VIII. New Business 1. Doctors Pass Jetty * Backup Material-RFP * Backup Material-Final Ranking Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary"Recommendation to approve the ranked list of design professionals pursuant to RFP No. 14-6257, "Doctors Pass Jetty", authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the top ranked firm for subsequent Board approval, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism (Project No. 90029)"dated June 12, 2014 for consideration. He reported the request is to negotiate a contract with the top ranked firm, Humiston and Moore Engineers. Speaker Bob Krasowski addressed the Committee noting he supports the project. Mr. Sorey moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the ranked list of design professionals pursuant to RFP No. 14-6257, "Doctors Pass Jetty", authorize staff to CAC September 11,2014 Approval of Minutes VI-1 3 of 5 negotiate a contract with the top ranked firm for subsequent Board approval, and hereby finds the item promotes tourism(Project No. 90029). Second by Mr. Butler. Carried unanimously 6— 0. 2. Marco Island Central Beach Re-grade * Backup Material—Marco Report * Backup Material—Proposal Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve a Work Order with Humiston and Moore Engineers to provide professional engineering services as needed by the Marco Island Central Beach Re-grade project under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ for a Time and Material amount not to exceed$169,724; authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order, approve necessary budget amendment, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism, Project No. 90062"dated June 12, 2014 for consideration. The scope of work is for the design, engineering, permitting and construction management of the project. He reported the Marriott is still deciding on what renourishment will be undertaken on their property and Madeira Condominium and the Marco Island Civic Association will bear the cost associated for placement of sand on their properties. Mr. Brown reported the beaches in the project area are characterized by a substantial dune system and additional plantings should not be required for the project. Mr. Brown moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve a Work Order with Humiston and Moore Engineers to provide professional engineering services as needed by the Marco Island Central Beach Re -grade project under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ for a Time and Material amount not to exceed$169,724; authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order, approve necessary budget amendment, and hereby finds the item promotes tourism, Project No. 90062. Second by Mr. Rios. Speaker Bob Krasowski addressed the Committee and requested public comment be taken before a motion is made as the speaker may provide input that influences a proposed action. Carried unanimously 6—0. 3. Naples Beach Renourishment * Backup Material—Contract Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary"Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Contract No. 14-6256 to provide professional engineering services as required by the Naples Beach Renourishment Project for$105,204 to Atkins North America, Inc., process all required budget amendments, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism, Project No. 90038"dated June 12, 2014 for consideration. Mr. Rios moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Contract No. 14-6256 to provide professional engineering services as required by the Naples Beach Renourishment Project for$105,204 to Atkins North America, CAC September 11,2014 Approval of Minutes VI-1 4 of 5 Inc.,process all required budget amendments, and hereby finds the item promotes tourism, Project No. 90038. Second by Mr. Brown. Carried unanimously 6—0. 4. 2015/2016 LGFR Approval • Backup Material-Proposal Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary"Recommendation to approve a Work Order with CB&I Coastal Planning&Engineering, Inc. to provide assistance with The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) 2015-2016 Local Government Funding Request (LGFR) Submittal under Contract No. 13-6164 for a Time and Material amount not to exceed$9,979; authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order and make a finding that this item promotes tourism (Project No. 80165)" 90038"dated June 12, 2014 for consideration. The Work Order is to identify County projects eligible for the FDEP cost sharing program. Mr. Rios moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve a Work Order with CB&I Coastal Planning&Engineering,Inc. to provide assistance with The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) 2015-2016 Local Government Funding Request(LGFR) Submittal under Contract No. 13-6164 for a Time and Material amount not to exceed$9,979; authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order and hereby finds the item promotes tourism (Project No. 80165). Second by Ms. Roddy. Carried unanimously 6—0. IX. Old Business Update on FEMA De-Obligation of Funds Mr. McAlpin reported: • To resolve the issue,the County is working with FEMA Region IV office in Atlanta and the Florida Department of Emergency Management. • Staff will be attending a meeting of the Florida Association of Counties where a presentation will be made to representatives of other jurisdictions affected by the issue. • Approximately 50 jurisdictions are affected by the de-obligation and the goal will be to establish a coalition with a common platform to address the issue. Update on Clam Pass Mr. McAlpin provided an update on a request by the Pelican Bay Services Division for an expenditure of$34,500 for obtaining a Nationwide US Army Corps of Engineers permit for dredging the Pass's area just easterly of its entrance to the Gulf of Mexico. The request was approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The Committee discussed the increasing requests for funding maintenance of the Pass. Management of the area is currently the responsibility of the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD)with the funds expended from the Tourist Development Council's(TDC) "Fund 195." Mr. Sorey noted it may be prudent for the TDC to establish an annual budget for maintenance of the Pass, with the PBSD being responsible to fund any amounts above and beyond the budgeted amount. Update on Tropical Storm Debbie FEMA reimbursement—Marco Island Beaches Mr. McAlpin reported Staff continues to purse the reimbursement of funds and is awaiting responses from FEMA on questions posed by Staff regarding the item. X. Announcements CAC September 11,2014 Approval of Minutes VI-1 5 of 5 Mr. McAlpin provided an article from the June 10, 2014 Sun Sentinel titled "Groups say beach restoration could harm reef"for information purposes. He noted Broward County proposes utilizing sand from the Stewart Mine in Immokalee to widen 5 miles of their beaches. Staff intends to meet with representatives of the Mine and Broward County to discuss future sand availability for beach renourishment projects. XI. Committee Member Discussion None XII. Next Meeting Date/Location August 14,2014—Government Center,Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor There being no further business for the good of the County,the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 1:45 P.M. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee Jim Burke,Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 1 of 18 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX REVENUE FY 14 TDC Revenue Report 31-Aug-2014 FY 14 Adopted FY 14 Annual FY 14 YTD Var to FY 14 YTD Description Fund Budget Forecast Forecast FY 14 YTD Actual Forecast Beach Facilities 183 693,700 840,267 802,803 811,290 8,487 TDC Promotion 184 5,440,200 6,589,411 6,295,618 6,362,177 66,558 Non-County Museums 193 369,200 447,166 427,229 431,746 4,517 TDC Admln 194 1,800,600 2,181,014 2,083,772 2,105,802 22,030 Beach Renourishment 195 5,706,000 6,911,364 6,603,216 6,673,026 69,810 Disaster Recovery 196 0 - 0 - 0 County Museums 198 1,489,000 1,803,495 1,723,085 1,741,302 18,217 Gross Budget $15,498,700 $18,772,717 $17,935,723 $18,125,343 $189,620 Lees 5%Rev Res (774,900) Net Budget 14,723,800 Collections %Budget Collected to %over FY13 %over FY12 %over FY11 Month Actual FY 14 Cum YTD Date collections collections collections Oct 574,901 574,901 3.7% -8.43% 9.44% 20.06% Nov 876,087 1,450,988 9.4% 19.29% 26.66% 40.15% Dec 1,056,505 2,507,493 16.2% 10.14% 14.25% 40.85% Jan 1,520,239 4,027,732 26.0% 19.10% 25.79% 50.56% Feb 2,551,510 6,579,242 42.5% 24.01% 33.79% 59.34% Mar 2,782,632 9,361,874 60.4% 16.11% 19.65% 37.34% Apr 3,721,589 13,083,463 84.4% 12.67% 33.50% 44.98% May 1,895,808 14,979,271 96.6% 29.53% 31.87% 39.73% June 1,216,039 16,195,310 104.5% 16.79% 30.12% 42.95% July 939,370 17,134,680 110.6% 12.93% 28.62% 38.19% ' Aug 990,663 18,125,343 116.9% 18.18% 27.29% 35.57% Sept 18,125,343 116.9% n/a n/a n/a ' Total 18,125,343 18,125,343 YTD 16.71% 27.18% 42.99% _Current Estimate 18,772,717 Budget Estimate 17,048,600 I Budget Comparison 5 Yr Collect 5 Yr Collect Budgeted Actual Budget to Actual Forecast Month History-Cum History-Monthly Collections Collections $Variance Collections Oct 3.5% 3.5% 548,712 574,901 26,189 603,583 Nov 8.2% 4.6% 717,469 876,087 158,618 789,217 Dec 14.2% 6.0% 930,912 1,056,505 125,593 1,024,002 Jan 22.4% 8.2% 1,269,166 1,520,239 251,073 1,396,084 Feb 35.1% 12.8% 1,978,765 2,551,510 572,745 2,176,639 Mar 50.6% 15.5% 2,400,701 2,782,632 381,931 2,640,773 Apr 69.3% 18.7% 2,898,005 3,721,589 823,584 3,187,811 May 79.1% 9.8% 1,523,102 1,895,808 372,706 1,675,410 June 85.4% 6.3% 970,266 1,216,039 245,773 1,067,289 July 90.3% 4.9% 756,037 939,370 183,333 831,641 Aug 95.5% 5.3% 814,545 - 990,663 176,118 895,999 Sept 100.0% 4.5% 691,020 0 n/a 760,122 Total 100.0% 100.0% 15,498,700 18,125,343 3,317,663 17.048,570 Tourist Tax Revenue Collection Curve b 54.0 - ____. 2$3.5 $3.0 52.5 52.0 _ - $1.5 - --- ___ rm [ Y $1.0 _. _. •'--- Forecast 50.0 ---- _.._._,______ _. __ G 0 z o u 5 Q 5 -. Q ut S 0/41201411'07 AM H1Revenue Repon7Aonthly Gas,Sales,and TDC Receipts v cn ao 0 0 w N a o a)N a" E aai> U) 0 4 0 H N m H H m N O 01 to m ,r V' N CO CO ON U) 01 C l At. co H Cl) 0 CO CO U1 U) U) - 4 N 4 M 4 H 4 ■■ a N 4 a H H E W E a' E E E on E E co O 0 0 0 0 0 0 H E E 4• Cu W Al W W W W C. Cl) CO U1 CO U) N Cl) - t0 h N CO O m O co 0 co 0 co 0 a' O to C7 0 to • a\ n l0 0) '..7 m 'J' l0 w) '.7 U) Q N 4 h 4 4 in Q m 4 4 O H H Ul 01 N m a' co 1-1 a m a O 4 m a In co CO 4 to 4 Oh U co D o ] N n to J N m 1-D 0 4-) al I"] h h h H h 1- ON >4 CO m 0 m U) H N a' 01 E.I. W a) N 6 W m M a1 m N H N m # In N O # # H E � # >' >. N * >+ N >4 o F >+ N > >+ N >4 > 0 CO 1 Q O 4 co < UI H 4 O E 1 N 4 •a co Z m Ca a' # H U U) H ZL U) a' Ul k H W O) v Ul Ul 0 CO co 43 W U # H E! # U # # E. H W Cl) # ) CL 10 O 0 a U) a a N C u c4 U) tx co H Ci7 C. 0) O 0. N ad C. N 0 0. CO H 0. m CL' 0. 4 0. to 1) a U o 0 'Q N W 4 N a N "U a E '� N O 4 co .4 al E > 0 m E 0 h E Z Z H Cs7 U H O E m >+ # 0) # l0 # 01 # VD # N # # N N N * 00 * h * 104 rn OH I. £ H I. < N * 4 * 4 N O N co N a' CO U � tn N t^ H N a 0 H 0] CO CO UN U) 1.0 C0 H MI co MI CO H 1-7 W to W m Ell o W h W to W W U) a D. H Cx. o Cu H L.A. d' Ct, m Li. G. H at 01 H U) 0 O N �y Ty Z N 4• ,.y p ,ti co KC N +y O, F4 1� N t-j h 1-] H r] h N h U h h O 0) 1.0 H a' N . m m N U1 H 00 U1 0 Ul N Ul U N U h U t0 U on U on U U 0 d' 41 0 ta m G7 m Cs} m W UN W W to H 0 m O h 0 0 to A H 0 A �o o t0 d+ m in N N N in 0 H N 0 N U) N H U) N > a > N > N > m > > CO o Z r- m Z h Z 01 > o Z Ul Z m Z Z 10 N N H r- * N N a' co A H o E H vi E N E o E ah' E _- E E 0 N U co U H U lil U N U to U U co m 01/40 0 m 0 0 a' 0 m 0 0 a' A h to m N W H H N Ul 0) • . I N o O 7 E • U , Q U . • m H a) a m r) cn cO CI) cn o U) H cn cn, m S 4 t0 a h a N h H FtP a N I 4 4 a< 'n d r 4 r a r+ 4 o 4 H w ¢ ao 4 4 r) H F co H o E. a H h ; F s F o H rn F F to O v O O to O O O h O O co O Ln O O N H E. to H H r-■ co F. H E- H to i-' ko F F H H N ' N CO H 1 H H W i O 4 a a a a a t a a a a a a w w W W w . W W w Gz w cn cn m cn m ■ m cn cn cn cn h H a co C 1/40 to N r) O N 0 to ; 0 to O CO O O O O 0 01 0 a) (7 0 to 0 In 0 h 0 rn 0 CO D rn O H a a D N D J < < H < r1 < Lo 4 oo < 4 r) 4 Q 4 O W rn M H N h 01 a co 01 F N , rn M H H UN h a O c-. 4 h ' a N a LO a H a to a ,, a H a .-1 4 a h 2 D rn : h a H 0 w 0 0, 01 0 H 0 5 r) ,'7 '7 H ' '7 t11 .7 en '7 01 7 O 17 h h '-j H .-j h 01 O to M H to rn U h rn U ' O . N N W t0 CO N O 01 rn W 2 r) H * N b to D aD H N 6 V' = O ,...1 17 h M .7 to '7 rO r7 H ,7 17. CO r7 OD ;7 r7 ,,0 'f' to H IE N t0 H a x O * N a.a. R H H x * W O h a r) to N a to * ■0 O CO • •■ O + >■ N �>+ h * > o >4 CO 4>+ O >+ h >. a >• >+ o • CO F h >� s + H 4 h a >�Q F a d co O* H a E H E 01 E to : a E co Z a E U) F i. H ; \ H O + N CO H 1f} h 01 ? H O ' to * E « H CO Z Z 15 FO H G. 4 H W to 4-7 N O cn E t0 � a m m (X H to 4Ea tr) Ea CO xx i0 a N >C4 cO Wa h Czta co Ox H x cn cc CO Fa H Oa Co ()a rn as H xa r) as N as H E.Cl. r) xa a to Fx4 01 p4: 01 a4 CO W4 h W4 to HQ rn (74 t0 a4 H WRL 4Ft H Fa Z' tD Z N F H F N Ra Z a N F N 0 0 N Z 0 H N CO to f 0 h to rt U U x N H E cn t x 0 F rn H x ' * N + h x to M to + h * 01 1 # r) 4 4 N a+ a VD -X a C * to * 1/4.0 * 04 to 4 a rr 4' a N I * � h 4 * 01 O < to < N 01 h a O 4 h 4 to 1 a h �L W F. E CO E co to R N £ a' E H E to I E H E .. N h m 0) N to 1 CO co >• N CO a h F H N a h a 1 to •to CO h : to 0 O 9 a W 0 oa ■0 ' w to W 0 an rn al a ' 0) a al (10 H U CO N W a W N CO N (.4 N W N W 0 W r) CO CO to CO to CL. N CO t0 CO H (• t0 1.. H G. ■0 (1. H CO CO H a tr) rn • N H a h U) W H • tr) h to H , H N a a QD to H 01 H N 01 N 01 O 7 to Z to to Z to H a Z a H Z M U < CO 4L O h 4 O to CO < r^ rn RC < N 17 t0 '7 r7 '7 a r: h tt t0 1 r; h 0) 17 H ■ r7 17 0 H H CO . H '..J' H : N H (T r) ' in H ;r) r) to H t0 N ',I'J' 01 1 to _ U s U H U Ln U 00 U V' U H U '.0 U to . U U C a W s W 0 W H W 0) W to W H W N W 0 1 W W to H O N O to O :r) O H 0 0 O A N O h 1 (O O t0 O a ■0 H N 0 I U) N CO r, 0 i H N C '.0 . .0 N to 0 C H h h \ > a . > CO > H r1 > H > CO > 0 > S > > CO 01 O t0 ' 0 to O N 0 rn O H 0 O rn 0 tD 0 O o o Z Z co 2 N 2 cO Z to Z Z t0 Z to Z Z to N t0 1 H to N N I CO X N rn rn co ' u) 1 ,714 a N H to E. u) F CO E. to F H F N I F A F to F H F F o N U H U to U 01 U V' U h U U to U O U U 01 r) O r-■ O co O H O H o r. 0 O N O H 0 0 o' G rn N to to h W a to 01 a CO• N O a ttoo so -s-s 3ND N 114 H F" N N N N N CO 01 Ot O 0 of d co F .- n v to .- .-14 of,~, z N O 5 0 N O o..- a LA N N .D 01 N d O M M M M of M" M M N W 4/3 N ii A 4.4 N t! V! O M iA N a`)m a et m W co r co N to Oen co M Ln N 1 N 1^ 1°n N ni < 00 N ca — N N N N N ~ N N v. an N to ti N 1 (n N {A 0 Q U W' M j n N o m m m CO n O ry ^ i• N O N N O N M n ti .`ni ti a 0 to in N in W N to N ,q V1 0 N .D N m Ot M T .D In �) .�D a N 01 O N a W MI i N N N ~ N N N N t/. an N N 0 N to N .q N M Z .c1-1 t0 O 0 N a .a'1 N N O m m m N m m n M N N N n N N N n N nn N N N N N Vf N tel. N tti iA a >I .01-1 N .mc m a o °eo 0 0 - a m °m N 04 v aO1i .n �' 2 m ti in .mit vm. .mi. in n N" F N N 0 m o d vmi ‘4.. o 43 en CC In m m .D v D, CO • y o tao o ao .c .c m to O a N N N N Di N N to� ~ W J CY oo D• Z n to O O n O 4 N m en V G o of ao .0 n eu 0 gi cc 2 N 0 N N N m N m i0 W in N N in N Ci a J an J 0 V > pp .-• Q O V .DN O .O iD O W N O m n n m a to m .D ni ry 1 0 Di m 0 a W N O n t0 to N N gn w N N N 1 N LL M i? CO N. C• O ry n N N co I co .ai N a N n tD O.r m ° °• N N VF N cm N V. of iR N C Ot m N CO O 0 ry m ry to O M 2 .° n o o 0 ^ r ei N t) N N N N N H -4 VT N CC a CO m tO m m a 0N On a Oi 2 01 n . to V N of >▪ a n :if ti N Pc' Z N N N N N N .m m t ..j N CC m 4 m w o m a N ro m w t N�pp• G .. or o N. 0 n p n O1 Q N N N N N N N an N an o 1 N o W D m m m a o Q 4.. N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g h .~ 0 co m .-. m N CO 4 1- N O N Lel m D 000 O N 0 co N IO O1 .-1 N P Ot to a eti a b O O .�-� .ay N N N Y1 m WI N•NI la 0 0 U() 4 M. 4 N N N vmf N N m N m m a .ro co cc LL1 el N 111 co N 2 O O r O^ W ° W a CO v°i ON �-1 m Ip m m el IN a= el o N IN N - 'a VT N UT N VT N UT IN ul VI v. 0 Q U at H ul a m e In o o y D 01 N n "a m m .. us N N N co N .-1 co. m el d N N IN N N N N N N VT N VT 0 N N CO W N N t0 N CO m .. N I NN 0 0 o N a m 40 o a op N I T N ..-1 .m-I N N N N N N VI N N N N VT 'q 44 N el LO m ut 0 ^ m m N n co o n g m m 4'. ry o e o Lo of as CNI IN^ ID N • NN .m. ry m n M N N VT N VT VT N VT 4 N 00 to >d O v1 N OM i N N LP Nu M O 0 ~WrI ^V 1i N m M m N M 00 T CO, O N VT N VT VT Vr UT VT M M1 an F I rn m m r m r m a o N C N 01 m cn G 6 O. W b N Z d r N m N O g N N N N IN N CO v v o n o CD n d Of ILI +n .n :n w AP aair VT v. V n1 J of J O I.) 00 co m m V co W o vmi DO d o m o N m AD In m m Le 4 m o m m °m m yyo m LL N N N VT UT N VT U1 VM4 N V.I. MI. Z W p cn b m o o m IT. m M O v " N T n TP N u .4 N al WN el ti3 In 0 m m a m m A 00 In ID m 00 N 2 Lo oi`' `� O1 .r H N ..-1 m N N N ...j 0 N N V} 6 -4 lD m .a-1 N M N ,s. .my uai N WI 2 Tr N ,^� .C. .Nn o O > ill .y F.1:: � m-1 ti r ti ry N el Z N VI VT N N N VT VT t•1 V} 0 W ^� ^ O . m Ini N N N N m m h co W m m 03 C ./Y tn. VT N N N N VT VF T..j {/1. o: m n m m N o .-1 v O O O O O O N Q T 'Cr LIT 03 O N O O O O el N N el ~ IN N N. N n 01 ~ O nto nN 0100 tD vi. 0 C n to to to ..-1 01 111 CA'.4' 00 a N J O .-1 .y N N N V M N d O W V! V 4" N V N W . ^ .i N m '' vN N N N LO N n i"C` t N N 44 14 0) 0 Q 0 N to 7 C'S CO ri 0 .0 N ID N N a o ?Cl'. N N H Vl N IA a W m 3 co n O J) o O N CO N N N N N w N g a N W a o o Z .Ni b n CO N co N N N N H QI ?.ci om v tol N n H 111 GO en co +i A . A v . F— nr H a N O W O 00 N 0 in co in O ri_ m. N m. CO 4 Q N W N N ti iN 1— J ICC Y z 0 0 n O - re m m 0 ti m ^ o Obi Q CO CC 2 N N N N N N N W J J 0 U 7 0 m 0) W co co cn to 44- N W O 01 N N N N N W N N N V (Q m N N m p m Q a fl I o N Z N In N ra N 0 N N Q N N ..01. C I.1.1 Cl W ^� co 13 . E. .n o .00 a V N N N N N N In a�A Uml N W 0 C CO ry o dr.' m CO r-1 0 N g N WN N N V4/1. N 0 0 O N N Z W Li 1 1:0 No m 'a 0 .o .n CO N mo N 0 t, Val N an on en N Val Cr N to VT Wb O n O W Of a , N .M O O N O Q Y Q O O N N N r 0 O O O Y O 0 O O N O LT. • ey N N :01 Mp 0wP -o I N N� I O O i ' N d O N.~c el O1 0a0 N N N N .N N VI N OE N C4 ex_ N h N N N N 0) co E m N N N .m O N 3 GJ //�.� N O 1 n as a)> y H N N N N N N N N N 0 Q 0 o eN`O 2 m m m n o m m no O e+ n o N m uo Q N N N N N H vs in IA CO CO o vl • co N in cri L0 Vag N N N N N Vt N N ZI tO :j..,1 O ti W co O) e. 0 h N N h N N H N u1 N N N cv QI O eNi m m Q W m o V 74- 0 0 0 m vi d N N V• VI N N VI. a? H 07 M 8, ON a0 oN • at CO O. ti N N tO N F2-1 O• V < VT en v N v N V! V! N VI N F- H W N °a Z _I M 0 to O u�i v o en Ln n ao imei o V w z sn en" W ✓• VF en in N N VT M N J J 0 U it W n W ry O 00 eei H m ao m a a o r a z vai . . o » 0 N ce co vs N N Vf .A 1I1 Vf N Q CC• .. m N N an hi hi to r n o0 0 0 to 03 N Z N N N N N N N N ei Pi N W op Of co C N cn en to O W - O en .aai m GI I.1.1!V N N N N N N N N N N 0 K a m N NO a n m . o n .-i e.i • S,' to a m a o to m .21 C vi Lri O N N W N N N an H N CO Z C V1 iO O) W m m o n en n 05 FCF N o o a n N o m ar a (./ N H• N N N N v v co. N O N i-SW O n W O O N a O N• O O O O O N \ � N ~Q Q 8 W n . N MO N N O N N o N N N a m 0a N 0 to e N m t4, �' N N N CO N VI t0 0 01 N I- it N 1-1 1/f f0 1f1 Opo t0 00 N 0.O z n 0 N 001 N 01 t0 •N-1 0 00 W N N V^F N N VI N N i0A O > V< 0 N 0 m Nil naol en m N .�-i N ■1 W v v Of F m m m m In m a m a> N I N N N 3 V1 IA N N V1 V1 '.j . M1 Q U I j N n o n ti N o PO' b ui. m m ry m o' m vi up Q h N N ■ N N V1 N N m oo m tim C in N V1 in N W N in V1 n• t0 N N co a n O 0 n b N a O O O N O1 O W u1 Z 111 Oi . en O a0 N4 LO N N N N gi N N N N t» N a YIa o o o ° m 00 n i ry n n s N ry n .5"m o 0i m v m e o 0 p co N in F O ti O O m m m0 '~ N N NI }} �O o h m O m N m N F a n vai m m m oo N 1.0 O Z Q m m o ry a n m ,.i I • 0 N N U1 N .h N N N V1 01 Q Z cc w 01 J N N W O1 M n 0 O J V m n 0`n0 01 00 co n -1 O < ..' ry m m m N ua1 01 en m CC n O O n 0 W N N N tel ill N N N N J J 0 V m o m o in m 9 a a n o n r n co 1O 0 m au ^ i tD .O 11Ni r K N O V N en LL co N N N in co N a~ii N in N Om1 O n to O 1101 n Qa1 v a oc ti vi ni a ro g Z m m e m N .non n 0 Q N■ Vf N N N N N 01. W N°i N CO a m a n n N et CO ry O o n .c CO ,-?�cn V 01 N ■1/1 N N N N N m N C ^ N N C m m m0 0 V 0001 ID m n en W m on ul a• W vi O6 .ti Li v ni a m M m a m m o a o .a Z N V1 h .Nn V1 vs N V1 N N N m C 01 ti O m w .o m o ti ON1 m , N o m o0 111 n torn, „ G ro m m m r N ^ d IN tri N N m N n N Q N V1 VI N N N in N rl V1 o ro m o m Fri 0 n O O O O a Q N n im n en ~Q +0 0 LL O O N O O O 4- pa 7 2 e s ri§ °® k N a wƒo , / i }2 3- ® - _ _ _ _ _ __rn � k \ Cnn rsi La, ( E 3 \ ' 0 ® _ ° ° _ ° ° — 0 ; Fi 4 J « « r.,§ To onl. el cri co' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (Po \} \ / q\E _G in ..n. o IN ® - re : \ rq on o IN rn co re co oi _ _ _ _co ° e % § § § @ k i o j _ _ I- 2w Z 2 � \ \ \ \ \ \\ f \ $ \ \ \ o k & i § k 4 4. _ _ _ _ _ _ ■ Z.14 n 0. \ _ v, V, \ _ ca ] \ _co _ _ _ (A (A in Ln - � 7\\ \o (A V) OT N _ 7 ) 7 4. Fo;zi 7§ N Lc;o 5 0 } . \} ce }� . \ \ \ ( \ ( \ \ 2k � �m \ § § `01 a a N N d ) 6._� § [» _ _ N _N _N _N _N _01 $ k\ w22 ).- k-0 s E e } / k & 2 2 3 in \ § 0 0 \f\ j \§ \ \ } \$ / f r. . _ 2. \} }} _ ® ° in V) / \ § $ / \ CO \ k an an an in in }tn. I. § - \ § }iii 7 z k i O. • in§ E 7 § « § ; ) CC § \ } \ \ / / / \ a/ 0 U \ j § o 4 0 00 U CO CC > i\| in in ( \ \ \ \ \ in \ } Ni \ cc N in - } a} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ) k\ n N N N Of v1 4 M M OF 0 N • en O rtl .n Oi W•O 0 0 4- -a a 0 a 1�D O •a-1 N M IAA n N V 0 W an in In ,CO Oi N an AN AN LT V1.M CC a- ,.., N OC (n CC N co C eI m ,0 W O 0, b O eat N Cl 14 Oti M evlf O v1 .; CN Va N Vl V) tn. N V) Cl) N JA U 4 U 7 to 0 T1 N m 0 N In CO N O .a1 .a1 n. `� 1% .a1 u' m a LCni'Q N N N N N N N N N N N ON .n 00 0 CO N N N Cr N NJ j 1 V h O O�1 O N °D • Vf VI N N N Vf N N v1 al N O1 H N N O e^4 Z N m ry ry a V N M N a •M M. VI N N VI. M. N V) in. N VI r 01 N G rn N a m a CO a o e^�i a • IA. n o 0o vi a umi o / vi /? vi m ei .n v,. 1n an N N ,�. .�. N a ur 00 X - V v O1 n co n e m aD 4 c a m oo O O ei eo a0 F p O N N I� N N N Qi rf Q H co V1 VV, V et rn 00 N N 0 N n N lan N to cz OZ I N at a N W CO a O e } C N m o n a m N m N Q cc o v o; 06 p, z O ^. 0° ry °: ry ry N a O VI VF w Vr an to va v, ed 0 00 H o o Ce J n °a o $ CO e1 o m NI J D In m CO n e ar° Ti 01 St N ri V1 OW 1�n a/T N M a/mR ea tO L N N N VI N C 4 M ad:N O OpD W 0 ap vaf a1 0 {O Qalai 1n an an awn an 00 `a O to us H S C W a N W W w ,m e N 2 N I� �D I� N n N 0 ry ea N m N m m m 10 01 cal a V! N N N N V1 N N N N a VI CO CO m m m L. Oaf N n v m e NI CO ey 2 a m a e1 a 0 W T . N eat N N N O VT 1n V~} N 1/1. an. aA H N 2 y'al e• l 0o n V N '" .7i o am0 Cr, CO e-1 O N m a /0 � e1 Of r n .o'+ aw m m m N a o N N N M V1 Vf N Vf N VT CC ut O O O O 0 e1 N m eat O O O O Q Y NO PA N 0 Q V O O O O O O O O on LL N N N N N N o O 000 a en u co n m as eenn °- v =m . m 1 e i eei ui ai v Lei 0°n Nc. O w 0: .y .- N N en .-1 N N .-I co• N d 0 N W an. N N N N VP N N Uf y„ m Q m N co a cc W E O f0 T n O m V N N G N O O en m N CO m 04 N .a ry N N N N N N N N H CO an U Q U m m to N v m a m co• m Co. n m .o a co 3 rfi O Ni Al x Q +n -4.R.i. n n an +n N ai IR N n �Ir vN�i N O. o m O g . N ✓ o m 2 n o a M N M N N cn e: N N N N N N N N H 2I m n a m UI w m N ' m vmi 01 m vi N N N N N N N N et ^o '^ o 01 a m ti o m 1O ry N o ° m en o vi w IA N awn. R .^n N N .-I N H X N M N N n 1281 O N m 0F0 F 0. o n N m m n 6 M CO N O N N n W F— Y 4 N :n. :n V`) +°n N IR .n Yed VI z IA O 0 o men Z .. o N N m m Z O 'L amn• N N VNT H N N to N 1-■ O L +A U o- W 4 J Q a o m .-1 N co O n a o o m o o n , O V co N N N M ~ N N to N N N N N N N N N N aN U. VI. CVD O m Ill N ul O Lo rl a .4 o Cr' n o m ° n gM 2 ..-i .0 ..na ..0 :ti " 00i . vi • N N N N N N N N M: W ^ co m LA 4 Ln 0 eo , p cn �. 1n .n M co N q .a .1 V N amn 1 N N N N N N N VT 0 cW g• to C V n N N nm1 O, N m N N y1 N1 ON Ti N N N N Vf aNn N N Z 2 CO GO $ 1^n W i V °m m m Si e.rri o 0 N ni N N N N N N N N ., 1A c, co m o . N a. O n O . O T O Q Q N .y O O O co O . . O O O r94 O O O O f- LL n Of N 0 0 N CO y 1- a ^ CO CO CO N o CO '-1 o CO O o a N n 1 tD ref cD CO N O ei 0 . 0 O 00 ti a 'A b 00 .00 N d ti O O W N N ~ -CL,- > N V? VF N CO N CO N Vf N VT V, a- N r` . W g E m m ni co in a o 0 ` 2 en v n 4 n co 00 M M N V ai N O rn V} U Q 0 n .o n n co cn co m N is iry N 01 w a m .ti ty0R ai .4 m rn tv Q W W N in N ln N N N N a N .+ N .°i n FO.' N .I �I m N ut or:-.; m co .� C n 00 R on on .n n N oi ...co y N N N to N N N N N 1 iv o m N 0 i CO . N O- . `n m a; p ui m m O M 00 N n . O m N N N N N in N yf Vi CO a0 N N . W m O■ni iI rfi Lon ni ta0v M O O N ■ .co-4 N ,r) V) I" VT N N VT N N N N N an to o X W M O In al O- N .4. N QO V O W m O O C .0 o v ry ai N 1 n n 00 N V en N 10 O N N VI < N N N N N N N N N . c. A D J W ~ _ v .o m o o m n a ni cc ni oti v f 00 u N en- a e M Z w 00 v m m. N N N N N N on N N 00 O IA o = C on W > .-I m m 0 v 'CO m a �j C n V m .-. b O n 0 J j o o N N o - . N N CO v-I 14 N ti •+. _ rLL N VI. N N N i N CD cc N O m Og H n ti O1 Z tO r a�i O .rvl W a�f d' CO d' N N n .COn N N N E N yj VT In m ^ 0 en on .°'n 00i0 . en W N n o 0o m O M T T . N to N N N N Vin N on N N n M O: 0 Vi m !::4 m m en m N m .-4 a 'a v CO - ri N O a ti on FCI ,, v uNNi on oo , N 2 c, N C n v co m tg O o .co N m o .-i m .i m a .n m v a �r0 00 nn'1 O t.N'1 T T O O1 d Lel p N N N in N N N N N h .c O n m o .+ N m > O O m O O O N m O Q °5 0 o N N N a N o N N NN. N N N IA N LO 3 Q M N N N M 01 N ,y a Cf O C n M to O a 'C J b N OD N 10 10 M N t. N a 0 C N N N N N ,I 4" N N N a W '�' VT LT L} N L1 VT N Lf N N N z W D N IA OOt O E .- Cl O O M CN n O m CO CO N O M v la n i ff 0? a■ M ai > vN i vi N N N N N N r-1 Lrr N tal 0 Q 0 M '0.11 N N 10 Q Cl V O a `. N n IIII n .ni M C1 t7 n n ti m .aa ti .ai a'o 1D Q N N �' N N N N N V1 N. . O O IA 01 Om f D m MI v 01 ri m a° .-1. of i ci O o n N N N N N N N N N ▪ m a 0 O M n On a , ....-I e o . w CO 2, c6 00; n ° ti °° e N N N V1 IA N N N N M n M N M 10 N N A > 10 m CO m CO m u1 al n M M T n m N M .-1 N N N IA Al Y1 IA N Al N N •l YJ N I . IA mn O O O W O i7,-;O n C J a m co N .�-� ... OmD 4.• O. H N N O V N N N IO 0 4 N N N M N N Al N N ▪ Q 1' Z F O Z V CI ry n vOi O ry n Lio N O+ O O .O W C O a N CO m CO' N CO m 0 a IN et 2 N N N N N N N N N N W J J O co V a" rn a m o Q• m a o , D ° o v R ti d al" d 'd N N ... 1y N N N N N N N N N u N > N f0 CO CO 0 M Of .I N re n Q M• O o r O .m-I O m n f0 00 O O O O ti O ti 10 ▪ N N N V~1 N N V~1 N N co C o N N Cl N 01 V N V f O+ N 2 . 0 m n IL tri N n m N fi o p U N N N N N N N In N ICI 0: ,I m V co Of l0 M .-1 O M N 01 l0 g1 rg to co uo n oo ro e, R. N O N N N N N N N N t�/f y Z W In rGO .IA O Ill °1w N O 01 Q n o O In N N N N W VVf N N l CO N O N M▪ e O n w m o . .i .i In O O O N N N Q>V O O O N N N Q N 0 P O O O O O O LL • - f CO c k § q NJ § &» 0 ¥ $ $ - a) f 4 _ _ _N _v-I _ _ }2 f/ 9 , ! 7 co\ \ .LO. _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 oo IA ) ± _ ra _ ® \ _ _. 2 _ in _ \ CO \ ta k i ® 0 © V. ® _ § 2 § / d \ \ \ - _CO \ -co }\ / 2 z 2 § § § E § ce , 6 R. ) / ) \ / / »$ § } \ \ \ \ \\\ \k CO ce \ \\ \ k\< k j \ . CO § CO } \ N .1. \ } 03 N N. a CL 5 \ N ■CO \ \ } \ \ &\ CC `§ V ® ` o 4.4 r0 0 41 0 r0 0 ! ! ..\\} \ \ \ \N , N Q 000 MI aOa N N ID t�D O 0 N 00 O 00 M M N V1 N CO M tD M J o ai ui vi e+i ai v o o tb O O w N 0 In 01 M N 01 In 00 en N CL O W Ct N N in N 4" in L! in N N .-ir c,D a N La W m m m 9 n n Ui mo m •M-i 0) v m m 10 m n CO O U.I``' F o 0 of ni m ni 01 r-1 CO to U Q V N ry n D1 07 LO O o m N 0n Vli 71 CO a N 0 n. ry ri o N m N Q ,C;'m N' Vn N N N N Vn vs N N In M O N N m is N N �I 0 m m m LO o m m M 0 N ti N m v U1 LO Vn N N Vn N N N to Vn N H ut 1,1 N O m 4a 00 W to en .0 O N < 0 10 ON N co N ~ ~ N N N N 00 in N IA to N N M in N H 00 >I °a m m 9 v 9 v ^� ui Le en co-e4 Le, at Vn N to N VNn N in N N N in. N r m mm v� M Q C o ry w n •r ai r i N m . e, 10 •-i t imm m .: "0. V i L + i N N 2 j 0- C N Ul LL 4.) O Or n m 9 m m n W m N ,4 N Z (7 f in M u1. .mn ti in to Vin to N O Z U De J a n m N b v 9 m m a C. J D n to 0i a n ID of N O g. Q C .9 N r ry H m y M L.) W in in in in in � in in in ...1 01 3 N y. 0 CO 10 n 01 01 M Q W m N ON O Ono n ~ °o ° m n Z .. N N m •to m N Q V U N V V 0 in Ul Vn N N CC W m m m .4 m O N m mo m to f o o 8 a o m v N r .4 cr Dj oN V . N tu -4/1. V N V in N N K ilt cn r m m v m m O1 m O W m ON co m 1Q i w S r ti o N in v N U Vn H Z 0: N ° m CO m .-i o co h .-1 o. m n u, lr0 N N m O 7 m O r N 00 N az ei .i N m K m 1h u1 IA VT -LO. Vf V) vn Vf V> N 4" a8 O O O o . .+ m W O m 8 O O O a Y O N 9 Q VN O O CO $ ° . O' O u O O O O O O * #± I- � k in 00 er / Cl,\ _ _ _ _ _ _ _N. _ _ k% . [3 3 § \> \ Z _ in in 01 In _On \ ) \ N. In an a CO ! R m G 2 ! p \7 LE4,11 en 01) \ . k eh um tO en in k0 l'i CO in \\ � 0- _ in in en in M El 1 _ ® 01 ® �in ƒ e § - § ` an en in in in ye \ 2 to I— ) _NT \ ) o r a \ \ _ en en it _ _ en in § ; . \ W,\ \ \ / \\ \ \ k \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \§ in ea co in ; ! 0 IA w en N. _ C0 N an o \ 8 co o "' & & & _ CTC & & = of 04 ® ( 2 ) \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ 0k c1111 N 03 M M v in n a .1 FP t0 t0 N tD N N N M $^N a a.N d O O M N 00 M CO M 0010 N r7 _0. I ti mi. 1 ,-I .1 .1 ,-7 ,-10- Y 1.11 V? to V? H iA .1/2 /R L?yj r 0) N M m m 00 O en N m o v N 1 W Ol N to n 01 n N 00 te ai Q) Le, .D .r�i In N 0 N NJ ter .D .D (b VI in N NF 0 Q V 0 n m N O 00 N O m 0 ce z N .-1 oo O V Lo to tn M N N � LO en H I, N n .mn C1 M n M OOi O 0 N J 4 N N N N VT 40 N 0) h in a .n W et > 0 J y LL 0- N O N O ni en m n en en o N 01 CO co m- W W r N rm M W ?I 7n N O J .1i co 41 N to N 00 Q, Z N to Y N CC N N m ON b N N CO d .1 O W a. Zl Va1 0 ttoo c0 N M p ry N m m co n n co m O N N N N N N N N O I W oo m w vNi w n N w 0 S0 al` 0 ta v1 v01 N N M en V ? 00 ON1 QX N N N N N N N N N Cn I• CC W al Z N O n T N .D uNt �+�1 O Ce - !� ut D. O T O 1p • J� K 00 M .D .O ft M a W b n 0 a vmi CO r. m n u1 O H N N N N N N N M m n 1— {A 0 N LY N N N N N N V}.l Z O J W 0 I— O V T W ti IN M W N - ADD tmD G to O I a 00 O Vl N l0 4 ad' N 10 V ¢ ry m m m o o m m 1°n N C Y f r N N N N N N N N IA J N J 0. O > a V } n O O N 0) IN 10 01 .Oi N Q 4 u1 T N N en O a vi Eli' ri a ad N o 0 co n amo m ID °m o u'41 M CY W N N N N .n .Nis .Nis N W ti vii CL a C n NN 000 n .AD- n in a N Let o co'L• Z O Lel Le,O N e1 O O N N V1 to ti VZ V N N V in N U N N 2 0 0 C 0o0 Z .I O o 0 f n 0 m ..00 0 en to O N N O U `6 04 8 a, o In o N rs In .• tu N N N N N N N N Sr yj N N Z W 2 a cc mC W .�O W V W O m W N Q < N l0 N N 01 n a O Q O N N H co N VNT W IN H PI N Vim} C Z AA N CZ m N CO tal N C W Oai W m W en N O M N N a W N N n aZ V ^� C ✓t m C Q ut .O vl Q N N N N N N N N N N h a� .D N co m O .-+ .N1 m eat 0 0.- O O O O \ O N O O F Q in �D n ao m o 00 � M 0 LL o o 0 o 0 0 o O o f CAC September 11,2014 VII-2 Staff Reports 1 of 3 Critically Eroded Beaches In Florida 1111 1,11 411 1/44T4'4'141tiii 1' 1 . . rr $ 7 i ' .IY T. Updated June,2014 4�1*�4a5TEETIONs. FLOR A ENGINEERING, HYDROLOGY,AND GEOLOGY PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA CAC September 11,2014 VII-2 Staff Reports Page 77 of 78 June?24 Collier County There are eight critically eroded beach areas (14.8 miles), three non-critically eroded beach areas (5.1 miles), and one critically eroded inlet shoreline area(0.8 mile) in Collier County. In northern Collier County, a 0.4-mile beach segment north of Wiggins Pass (R14-R16.3) is critically eroded threatening sea turtle and gopher tortoise habitat. A 1.6-mile beach segment (R22.3-R30.5) is critically eroded threatening development interests in Vanderbilt Beach. This area has a beach restoration project and numerous bulkheads. The City of Naples has two segments that are critically eroded threatening development interests north and south of Doctors Pass.North of Doctors Pass(R45-R57.5)is a 2.4-mile critically eroded segment with the northern 1.1 mile included for the design integrity of the beach restoration project. Between Doctors Pass and Gordon Pass (R57.8-R89) is a 5.6-mile critically eroded segment. These areas of Naples have continuous beach restoration projects. Numerous bulkheads and revetments also exist throughout Naples. Groins exist north of Gordon Pass. South of Gordon Pass (R90-R111) is a 3.9-mile stretch that is non-critically eroded along the northern half of Keewaydin Island. Between Little Marco Pass and Capri Pass, Sea Oat Island has 0.9 mile of beach that is non-critically eroded. Marco Island has three areas that are critically eroded threatening development interests. Along Hideaway Beach, the north shore of Marco Island (H3-H11) fronting on Big Marco Pass has 0.8 mile of inlet shoreline that is critically eroded. The central gulf beach of Marco Island (R134.5R139)has 0.8 mile that is critically eroded and the southern stretch of beach(R143-R148) has 0.9 mile that is critically eroded. All three critically eroded areas on Marco Island have beach restoration projects, and the northern segment also has a rock groin field along Hideaway Beach. Erosion on the two southern barrier islands in Collier County has progressed into the backshore mangrove forest resulting in the loss of beach wildlife habitat. Following Hurricane Wilma(2005), a 1.6-mile segment of Kice Island(V23-V31.4)is critically eroded. South of Morgan Pass,Morgan Island has a 1.5-mile segment (V33.8-V41.8) that is critically eroded and a 0.3mile segment (V41.8-V43.5)that is non-critically eroded. Last updated June, 2014. CAC September 11,2014 VII-2 Staff Reports , Page 78 of 78 June3241 4 June, 2014 ' i Corner County Location Classificaton Lee County R014-R0.16.3 Critical %).. •) _ R022.3-R030.5 Critical ,,- —V ----3 I R045-R089 Critical Wiggins ,fia.-.1, , I R090-R111 Noncnti cal Pass 1.4' •• I i ..iiii I Sea Oat Island Noncritical l ' - 1——"---1-11--- - -- -i - - H3-1-111 Critical Inlet R134.5-R139 Critical i----N., R143-R148 Critical c, \ ,.—i_____I . ‘ V023-V031 A Critical '441-3. II 1 1 li r - V033.8-V041.8 Critical V041.9-V043.5 Noncritical Park Shore jt. --4--1,---,___ __, i l____ 1 1 1 --I Doctors a Li.. Z-1 Pass I -Vt. 1:,4:,. ,,.._ Symbology Naples 1 ' :_` III 1 —..,___Lif -- • Range MonuniN eri M 1 --.'. — ajw Rcarl$ 1 Erosion Classifications , -, L..„, , 4'.r ......_____ Gordon Pass =-.,,,, ,i• + ---- Cuttcal ... — Cuttcal Inlet —Noncliticoi Keewaydin Island .-...nt, v.' • .. • --!-.. •, .., ,, Little Marco Pass Ses 631,...d ..,., , . ( J,•, ,1' '.; -0."..7. C,S,P37.: *V;: :!,, ,.. • jk i 6;Vann=a= . ( ,r, / ..0 ';,,‘. 'I..' 11-}4 :k„ / ‘,... .%.. Gulf Of Mexico Marco Island 1 '0 . • .„...` •-•-ocgo 1 • •,..,:• ,,....„---- / t c a:x amb as Pass ::::),,,,(,- .:,.....,--,ci.•••I,,,1"-- NIA? 0 If ?. ,E. 9 12 Kice Island ... ,3 \ Miles Morgan Pass Morgan Island sio r Kilometers 4 12 16 Cape Romano C, 2 c CAC September 11,2014 VII-2 Staff Reports 1 of 1 From: Brantly, Robert[mailto:Robert.Brantly@dea.state.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday,July 09, 2014 3:05 PM To: McAlpinGary Cc: Cheng, Chiu; George, Vincent Subject: Park Shore - Critically Eroded Beaches Hi Gary, Sorry about the delay, but the Park Shore reach is now designated critically eroded beach. North of Doctors Pass (R45-R57.5) is a 2.4-mile critically eroded segment with the northern 1.1 mile included for the design integrity of the beach restoration project. The expanded area is included in the annual update of the Critically Eroded Beaches of Florida report, which is being formatted as an ADA-compatible .pdf document for sight-impaired readers. The report will be posted on the Department website next week and I will send you the link. Best Regards, Bob Robert Brantly,P.E.,Program Administrator Engineering,Hydrology&Geology Program Division of Water Resource Management Department of Environmental Protection 2600 Blair Stone Road,Mail Station 3595 Tallahassee,Florida 32399-2400 Direct Phone: 850-245-7577 NOTE NEW PHONE NUMBER Robert.Brantly@dep.state.fl.us CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 1 of 260 DRA 2005 to 2014 HISTORICAL BEACH ANALYSIS Prepared For: Collier County—Coastal Zone Management Department Coastal Zone Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 ow PS' _) p ,Y'+Ly ;Labii a• ,lk qs. . mow" 4 Ada ai. Prepared By: Atkins 4030 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 700 Tampa,FL JULY 2014 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 2 of 260 COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF COLLIER COUNTY BEACH SURVEY DATA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report evaluates the condition of the Collier County Beaches over the last nine years, including the impacts due to Hurricane Isaac, Tropical Storm Debby, Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Wilma and comparison to the post-construction surveys for the 2006 Collier County and South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Projects. The Mean High Water (MHW) shoreline and volume changes since the nourishment projects are summarized by their respective beach extents below. An overall average loss of shoreline was seen within the Collier County project areas from the completion of the 2005/2006 renourishment to Post Hurricane Isaac Survey in April 2013; with some hot spots experiencing substantial losses in shoreline width. The volume analysis indicates the material lost above MHW (dry beach) due to storms generally remained within the depth of closure. During the following year a portion of the material lost from the dry beach returned to the dry beach resulting in recovery of some of the dry beach width. In addition it was also noted the year following storm events that a large portion of the volume that was initially lost from the dry beach was lost offshore beyond the depth of closure as well. Of all the project areas, Naples Beach has fared best retaining more volume and beach width, but significant hotspots are present and continue to be perennial issue. Collier County Beaches - Average Mean High Water Shoreline Changes (feet) 2005 Fill T.S. T.S. Hurricane Truck 2014 Pre-Con Event Fay Debby Isaac Haul Final Beach 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2013- Beach Beach Reach Width 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Width Vanderbilt Beach 101.3 +37.4 -5.3 -14.5 +1.0 +3.8 -5.8 -2.7 -11.9 +23.3 122.1 (R-23 to R-31) Pelican Bay 92.8 +22.5 -5.3 -11.7 +11.9 +4.7 -3.4 -1.9 -9.4 +12.5 102.9 (R-31 to R-37) Park Shore 82.2 +30.9 -8.6 -5.5 +2.3 -5.0 4.9 -5.2 -3.0 +21.2 105.6 (R-45 to R-55) Naples Beach 86.5 +56.5 -9.2 -7.7 -0.2 -1.4 -0.1 -4.3 -2.5 +18.6 128.2 (R-58 to R-79) South Marco Island 144.3 -34.7 -0.6 -10.7 -0.8 -22.6 78.2 - (R-145 to G-1) ATKINS CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 3 of 260 Collier County Beaches - Volume Changes in Cubic Yards Fill T.S. Truck Event T.S.Fay Debby Hurricane Haul 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- Isaac 2005- 2013- 2005- 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2011- 2012-2013 Beach Reach 2006* 2012 2014 2014 Vanderbilt Beach 108,642 -639 -35,820 7,595 13,292 -31,429 43,466 -58,871 62,722 10,437 (R-23 to R-31) Pelican Bay 78,858 -14,864 23,491 -21,805 3,894 -19,893 21,409 -36,912 36,175 4,640 (R-31 to R-37) Park Shore 93,593 -5,235 38,822 -49,680 -21,089 29,006 24,335 -34,070 80,193 12,592 (R-45 to R-55) Naples Beach 296,568 -60,190 -33,225 112,770 -28,415 8,304 -55,067 47,847 119,384 9,343 (R-58 to R-79) South Marco Island 182,469 -6,713 10,604 -624 -19,508 -27,285 68,686 - - (R-145 to G-1) TOTAL 577,661 101,541 -13,446 59,484 -32,942 -33,520 6,857 -13,683 298,474 37,012 * Volumes as identified by Coastal Planning&Engineering (2010). ATKINS CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 4 of 260 COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF COLLIER COUNTY BEACH SURVEY DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BEACH NOURISHMENT ACTIVITIES 1 III. STORM ACTIVITIES 5 IV. SHORELINE CHANGES 6 a. VANDERBILT,PELICAN BAY&PARK SHORE 6 i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay 6 ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby 7 iii. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac 7 b. NAPLES BEACH 12 i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay 12 ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby 12 iii. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac 13 c. SOUTH MARCO ISLAND 14 i. 2007 to 2008 -Effects of Tropical Storm Fay 14 ii. 2011 to 2012-Effects of Tropical Storm Debby 15 V. VOLUME CHANGES 19 a. INTRODUCTION 19 b. VANDERBILT,PELICAN BAY&PARK SHORE 19 i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay 20 ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby 20 iii. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac 20 c. NAPLES BEACH 21 i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay 21 iv. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby 21 v. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac 21 d. SOUTH MARCO ISLAND 26 i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay 26 ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby 26 VI. THE EFFECT OF STORMS ON EROSION RATES 28 i. Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay Beach Erosion Rates 28 ii. Park Shore Beach Erosion Rates 30 iii. Naples Beach Erosion Rates 31 VII. SUMMARY 32 VIII.REFERENCES 35 ATKINS CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 5 of 260 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.Vanderbilt,Pelican Bay,Park Shore,and Naples Beach Location Map 3 Figure 2. Collier County Beach Construction Timeline 2005-2014 4 Figure 3. Storm Tracks 6 Figure 4. Beach width remaining(2005 to 2009)measured from the 2003 baseline 10 Figure 5. Beach width remaining(2005 to 2014)measured from the 2003 baseline 11 Figure 6. Year to Year MHW Shoreline Change Plot for South Marco Island 15 Figure 7. Yearly Changes in Beach Width Compared to the Design Standard for R-30(Vanderbilt) 17 Figure 8. Yearly Changes in Beach Width Compared to the Design Standard for R-46(Park Shore) 18 Figure 9. Yearly Changes in Beach Width Compared to the Design Standard for R-62(Naples) 19 Figure 10. Year to Year Volume Change 2005 to 2010 22 Figure 11. Year to Year Volume Change 2011 to 2013 23 Figure 12. Year to Year Volume Change Plot for South Marco Island 26 Figure 13. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Vanderbilt Beach 29 Figure 14. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Pelican Bay Beach 30 Figure 15. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Park Shore Beach 31 Figure 16. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Naples Beach 32 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.Fill Placement Activities 2 Table 2.Vanderbilt,Pelican Bay and Park Shore Beach Width Measured From the 2003 Baseline 9 Table 3. Naples Beach Width Measured From the 2003 Baseline 14 Table 4.Year to Year MHW Shoreline Changes for South Marco Island Project Area 16 Table 5.Vanderbilt Beach,Pelican Bay&Park Shore Volume Changes to the Depth of Closure 24 Table 6.Naples Beach Volume Changes to the Depth of Closure 25 Table 7. Year to Year Volume Change Summary for South Marco Island 27 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Comparative Profiles Appendix B. Yearly Profile Beach Width Comparison to Design Standard ATKINS CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 6 of 260 COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF COLLIER COUNTY BEACH SURVEY DATA I. INTRODUCTION This historical analysis report evaluates the shoreline and volume change with respect to beach nourishment activities and storm events for the period from 2005 to 2013 for the following reaches along the Collier County shoreline: • Vanderbilt Beach • Park Shore • Naples Beach • South Marco Island For the shoreline reach including Vanderbilt Beach, Park Shore, and Naples Beach this report will use the 2005/2006 beach renourishment project as a baseline for the volumetric and shoreline change comparisons. For the South Marco Island project, this report will use the 2006/2007 renourishment project as the baseline. II. BEACH NOURISHMENT ACTIVITIES In the spring of 2006, a Trailing Suction Hopper Dredge was used to place a measured quantity of 667,562 cubic yards of sand along 8.5 miles of shoreline from R-22 to R-79. Included in the 2006 nourishment project were the Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay, Park Shore, and Naples Beach fill areas indicated in Figure 1. In addition to the 2006 renourishment, multiple placement events have occurred between 2005 and 2013. These events include the dredge and placement of material from Doctors Pass, Wiggins Pass, and Clam Pass as well as one truck haul project in 2010, two truck haul projects in 2011, two truck haul projects in 2012, and a major truck haul project in 2013/14 (see Figure 1). Wiggins Pass was dredged in 2007, 2008, 2011, and 2013. In February 2007, 48,400 cubic yards of material was removed and pumped south for placement between R-17 and R-19.5. In 2008, 51,300 cubic yards was removed from Wiggins Pass with nearshore placement on both sides of the inlet. In 2011, 51,430 cubic yards of sand was removed from the inlet and placed in the nearshore at Barefoot Beach, R-12 through R-14.2. Most recently in 2013, 107,000 cubic yards were dredged and placed in the flood shoal S-curve, and in the nearshore along Barefoot Beach. In November 2012 an emergency fill project was conducted using an upland sand source for nourishment of Vanderbilt (R-26 to R-30) and Naples (R-61 to R-63.5) Beaches totaling 20,320 cubic yards, in response to damage earlier in the year from Hurricane Isaac. When Clam Pass was dredged in 2007, 21,000 cubic yards of material was removed and pumped south for beach placement between R-42 and R-43.5. The Pass was dredged twice in March of 1 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 7 of 260 2013 totaling 20,056 cubic yards, of which there were three placement areas. Two placement areas were north of the Pass where 9,626 cubic yards was placed from R-39+700 to R-40+725, and 5,553 cubic yards from R-41+50 to R-41+377. The third placement area was south of Clam Pass, where 4,877 cubic yards was placed from R42+180 to R-43+700. Doctors Pass underwent maintenance dredging in 2006, 2008, and 2013. In early 2006, 53,630 cubic yards of sand were removed from Doctors Pass and pumped south onto Naples Beach between FDEP monuments R-60 and R-62. The Doctors Pass project was repeated in 2008, this time removing 32,551 cubic yards with the same fill limits. In 2011 the north Jetty of Doctors Pass underwent rehabilitation, placing 2,145 cubic yards of rock to an elevation of 6.0 feet, North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) (CPE, 2011). In 2013, 44,000 cubic yards of material was dredged from Doctors Pass and placed immediately south of the inlet. Park Shore and Naples Beach also received nourishment from Immokalee Mine, an upland sand source. The Park Shore placement occurred from March 22-29, 2011 and had a surveyed total of 4,664 cubic yards. The Naples Beach placement was from February 23 to March 11, 2011 and totaled 16,602 cubic yards by survey (CPE, 2011). Table 1. Fill Placement Activities Year Description Location Volume 2010 Truck Haul Project by Earth Tech-Immokalee Mine Doctors Pass Beach 3,713 cy 2011 Truck Haul Project by Eastman-Immokalee Mine Park Shore 4,664 cy 2011 Truck Haul Project by Eastman-Immokalee Mine Naples 16,602 cy 2012 Truck Haul Project-Immokalee Mine Vanderbilt R26-R30 12,000 cy 2012 Truck Haul Project-Immokalee Mine Naples R61-R63 10,700 cy Vanderbilt,Pelican 2014 Truck Haul Project-Immokalee Mine ' Bay,Park Shore& 225,071 cy Naples In 2013/14 Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay, Park Shore, and Naples Beach were nourished using the Immokalee Mine. The following describes the totals for each reach: • Vanderbilt Beach—65,731 cubic yards • Pelican Bay—27,390 cubic yards • Park Shore—66,100 cubic yards • Naples Beach—65,850 cubic yards Along South Marco Island a renourishment project occurred from November 2006 to January 2007. Beach fill material was dredged from Caxambas Pass and placed between R-monuments R-145 to R-148. Overall, approximately 176,000 cubic yards of sand were placed onto the beaches of South Marco Island. In addition, approximately 8,000 feet of existing beach to the north of the project area was graded (CPE, 2010). In May of 2013, Cavache dredged approximately 77,000 cubic yards from the Caxambas Pass Borrow Area and placed it on the South Marco Island Beach. Figure 2 below gives a timeline of dredge events and maintenance beach nourishment activities since the 2006 beach nourishment project. 2 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 8 of 260 i ! 1ti� w R-, BAREFOOT -."1I•_ Z BEACH WIGGINS PASS DREDGING: -, 3 2007-46,400CY 0 2011-5t,430CY t 2008"51,300CY (7(7--.�1- . t�,„� 2013-11 7,37CY00 - , '- ;:h 2013-307,370CY /# 4.- I- �yy,� Z 8 1,7,:--- 1c� w 2007-41.400CY ^'�': 8 'PRalecl '-'47-±_...-�"1 sktl, - L\` T2 0 2006-1 1,487CY VANDERBILT BEACH z 2013.65,7315CY x 2012-1 ,OOOCY Q CD 4 Z D 2006-56,955CY 0 2013-27,390CY U PELICAN BAY CLAM PASS DREDGING2 ' W 2006-20,000CY - 2013-I5,179CY 0 0 0, 0 U 0 o ,..- 2013-3 2013-3 ,632CY •1 w r, r 2009-21 COOLY d S z,-,OS co<1O o mos U n ,--El D Q n 0 LL n UJ 2006-1 1,739CY , R PARK SHORE 0 co 4 2011-4,664CY >-O r LI. 2013-32,468CY DOCTORS PASS DREDGING. 03 Q M 0 1 2006-53,630CY m 2006.32,BAICY J 2013-43.9 6CY /.9 D. IFI 2013-4�,99BCY cn 2006-53,360CY C 2008-32,551 CY 2012.13,700CY I �- J J 2006- 16.60 1CY NAPLES NAPLES 2011-16,602CY O 4 Ille 2013-65,850CY �9l'� 4I .4011111111111 41111141191 400 00 N' DATE GRAPHICS SCALE IN FT LEGEND' 11, -.. . 06/09/2014 R11+000 TO BAREFOOT BEACH R16+000 BY. R221700 TO VANDERBILT \ R31+500 MSS R31+600 TO PELICAN BAY R37+000 COMM NO PORT ROYAL R45+450 TO PARK SHORE n R`04 3 GORDON PASS r 134 R58+900 TO NAPLES `. , SHEET: R76+350 NOTES: i.FILL DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO SCALE. Figure 1. Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore, and Naples Beach Location Map 3 E \% . ' C) _ ) ie!°.. \ ! ] . . m §.2!/ – . NI - , I » �..!-.? :,R `° % t\\] - E ) _ !! !ii`` z .. - - �§ §)p £ T R. .: \I. Ot - /ƒ :=V!:, =Si 2 y — _: — |` - !! / )) ƒi "EE , ! iƒ . !! :{ §:::§: 2 - §_ j / §{ §!, tial' ; t ` ^ — 10 4A ;f| ` �, \ �\ / § _ §; . . \ " ))/ 1 § n , ( 2. § ;, §\/ — - — -'s §,,:;,% !! — — ii! , - {\ | `^ - ig / Si?; | _ \ i;§ ;§ - |�.,, !!; \ — 1 .. — 8'2,c l' !!. _ , ,|E!,| � � ` 2 tz !!V / _ — ';.. , 2 \ 2 #; _ !., — – {t, _ \/\ !f| - . ;l; © 88 - )j� - q a i. 7 §� - , / - i.t - \§ — , . - , !|} _ _ - |§ � f� f} |i., !_ § "q - !}_ 111 4-4 �` — — |! ;! ! c cfl §| \| - )} - \ - - - }{ - } 3- } Figure 2. Collier CouGy Beach Construction Timeline 2005-2014 4 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 10 of 260 III. STORM ACTIVITIES During the period from 2005 to 2014 four hurricanes/tropical storms have affected the Collier County beaches (Figure 3). Hurricane Wilma (October 15 - October 29, 2005) was the strongest hurricane recorded during the 2005 hurricane season with sustained winds of 185 mph. Hurricane Wilma entered the Gulf of Mexico from the Yucatan Peninsula on October 21 and tracked towards Collier County making landfall in Cape Romano on October 24 as a Category 3 hurricane with sustained winds of 120 mph. Wilma brought extensive damage to the Collier coastline. Further discussion on the impact of Wilma will be included in Phase 2 of this report. Tropical Storm Fay (August 15 — August 27, 2008) formed over the Dominican Republic making landfall in the Florida Keys on August 18, and made a second landfall in Naples on August 19 with maximum sustained winds of 70mph and rainfall totals up to 25 inches. Tropical Storm Fay then crossed Florida and made a third landfill in New Smyrna Beach and crossed back across Florida into the Gulf of Mexico and tracked towards the Florida panhandle making a fourth landfall in Panama City. Tropical Storm Debby (June 23 — June 28, 2012) formed in the Gulf of Mexico from a low pressure system and tracked towards the Florida panhandle making landfall near Steinhatchee with recorded winds of 40mph. Hurricane Isaac (August 21 — September 03, 2012) formed off the western coast of Africa and crossed the Atlantic Ocean making its first landfall in the Florida Keys and then entering the Gulf of Mexico on August 27. Hurricane Isaac intensified in the Gulf of Mexico as it headed towards Louisiana where it ultimately made landfall as a Category 1 storm with 80mph winds. 5 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 11 of 260 Fay 2008 ...�.,:, Debby 2012 _ Wilma 2005 Or+anao Study Area ' Isaac 2012 Mian; Na esau. f ' d A M A M A ti 44 Figure 3. Storm Tracks IV. SHORELINE CHANGES The shoreline location of each profile in this analysis has been defined as the measured Mean High Water (MHW) elevation. For the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore, and Naples Beach Project, the MHW elevation is +0.33 feet (NAVD 88). Shoreline change values are summarized by beach project area and compared 'year to year' for each monitoring event. A. VANDERBILT,PELICAN BAY & PARK SHORE i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay Shoreline changes 'year to year' for these beaches can be found in Table 2. Figure 4 depicts the shoreline change after the initial nourishment in 2006, and provides a detailed look as how it has receded in recent years to the pre-construction condition. The entire monitoring area is bound by FDEP monuments R-23 through R-57 and the 2006 nourishment project area included beach fill placement from R-23 through R-37 and R45 to U-55. As reflected in Table 2 and Figure 4, it is noted that for the time period from 2007 (one-year post-construction) to 2008 (post-Tropical Storm Fay) Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay beaches experienced shoreline erosion including the area from Pelican Bay to Clam Pass (R-36 to R- 41). This is to be expected that at least some portion of the shoreline erosion is due to Tropical Storm Fay which occurred in August of 2008. Note that the physical monitoring survey occurred shortly thereafter in September of 2008. 6 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 12 of 260 Immediately south of Clam Pass from R-44 to R-46, a slight seaward advance of the shoreline was noted. This is a direct result of the Clam Pass maintenance dredging that occurred in early 2007 where 21,000 cubic yards of material was excavated and placed between R-42 and R-43.5. Erosion was noted immediately south of Clam Pass. This is a clear indication that Clam Pass is a sink, intercepting the sandy beach fill material that travels alongshore from north to south or south to north along the shoreline depending on prevailing conditions. In the event of a severe storm such as Tropical Storm Fay, recovery of the beach and shoreline generally occurs within the following year or two. When examining the period from 2008 to 2009 (one year following Tropical Storm Fay) there is a very clear indication of shoreline recovery/advance within each of the project areas. It was noted that the same magnitude of recovery did not occur to the beaches adjacent to the beach nourishment project areas. This indicates that the material eroded during Tropical Storm Fay remained within the active littoral system fronting the project areas. During the period from 2008 to 2009 material migrated onshore and resulted in the shoreline advance as reflected in Table 2 and Figure 4. ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby For the period from July 2011 to August 2012 (post-Tropical Storm Debby) each of the project areas performed better than the period from 2006 to 2008. As reflected in the October 2012 "Collier County Tropical Storm Debby Post-Storm Report" prepared by Atkins, "both the Vanderbilt Beach and Pelican Bay shorelines within the project area have receded. Pelican Bay, from R-31 to R-37, lost slightly less beach width over its area with an average loss of 1.9 feet, while Vanderbilt Beach, from R-22 to R-31, lost 2.7 feet on average. The average shoreline lost over the project area from FDEP monuments R-22 to R- 37 is 2.4 feet." Figure 4 shows that Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay were generally stable for this period with the most significant shoreline recession of 11.6 feet at R-28. At the north end of Park Shore a significant amount of shoreline recession occurred at R-45 and R-46 (44.1 feet and 48.6 feet). It was noted that the shoreline recession immediately north and south of Clam Pass during this time period was greater than any other year to year comparison from 2006 to 2013. iii. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac For the period from August 2012 to April 2013 (post-Hurricane Isaac) each project area showed a consistent yet mild amount of shoreline recession (generally less than 20 feet). It was also noted that the areas immediately north and south of Clam Pass showed significant seaward advance of the shoreline (between 40 and 60 feet). The post-Isaac surveys at Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay beaches show a general shoreline recession in the monitoring area from August 2012 — April 2013. An average shoreline loss of -11.9 feet was observed at Vanderbilt Beach (R-23 to R-31). The average loss of shoreline is actually buoyed by the addition of nearly 12,000 cubic yards of sand from R-26 to R-30 from the upland fill project conducted in November 2012. At Pelican Bay (R-31 to R-37), an average loss of -9.4 feet was observed. Significant accretion between R-39 to R-41 was recorded, and is attributable 7 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 13 of 260 to the placement of 15,200 cubic yards of dredged material immediately north of Clam Pass. The average shoreline lost for the entire project area (R-23 to R-37) during the 2012 to 2013 timeframe is -10.7 feet. From August 2012 to April 2013, an average shoreline recession of-3.0 feet was observed within the Park Shore project area (R-45 to U-55). Looking at the monitoring area (R-42 to R57), the average shoreline calculations indicate a generally stable condition for the project, yielding a minimal shoreline change of+0.5 feet. However, the Park Shore project area has experienced significant shoreline losses between R-47 through T-50 and R-52 ranging from -13.5 feet through -22.7 feet. Most of the Park Shore profiles have shown shoreline recession with the exception of R-43 through R-46 and T-57 at Doctors Pass. The profile located at R-42, immediately South of Clam Pass, has seen a significant shoreline recession (-41.5 feet) since August 2012. The R-43 through R-46 reach suffered significant impacts during Tropical Storm Debby (June 2012), but has since shown advancement with the added help of dredged material from Clam Pass placed from R-42+180 to R43+700. In 2013, the beach width has increased an average of +32.7 feet from R-43 to R-46, compared to the 2012 conditions. The positive shoreline advancement at T-57 may be attributed to the jetty rehabilitation project (2011) capturing more sand north of Doctors Pass. 8 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 14 of 260 Table 2. Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay and Park Shore Beach Width Measured From the 2003 Baseline R-Mon Design 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Standard R-22 100 106.7 106.6 120.1 112.2 112.0 124.3 118.3 108.2 N/A 119.8 R-23 100 101.7 122.8 128.6 115.8 118.3 113.0 121.5 115.6 109.5 116.9 R-24 100 115.8 132.2 138.2 118.5 115.9 135.2 123.9 124.9 99.4 113.7 R-25 100 94.5 135.3 135.7 112.3 111.9 124.2 112.1 113.0 93.1 107.6 R-26 100 108.6 147.4 147.9 123.4 123.0 134.8 121.1 122.7 106.1 139.3 R-27 100 82.5 123.8 116.5 97.8 96.4 97.3 89.0 90.9 90.7 125.0 R-28 100 97.0 137.5 123.2 112.0 107.6 111.9 111.0 99.4 87.6 120.3 R-29 100 87.5 143.1 119.5 105.3 108.0 106.7 105.5 98.3 93.2 123.1 R-30 100 109.7 141.0 130.8 108.7 124.9 113.0 107.5 116.5 109.8 125.0 R-31 100 108.9 131.5 121.0 117.2 135.9 131.3 124.4 117.4 102.0 130.2 R-32 100 110.2 139.1 123.3 108.8 127.4 126.1 130.7 119.7 114.6 122.2 R-33 100 95.7 106.5 95.8 99.2 108.0 111.4 112.6 104.9 94.6 103.2 R-34 100 82.7 103.9 106.5 86.5 92.9 109.8 100.2 101.9 88.8 99.5 R-35 100 81.7 103.2 97.5 78.5 93.9 97.1 93.9 87.0 81.9 103.9 R-36 100 84.3 95.5 91.9 78.6 82.0 91.7 89.8 90.4 77.9 95.8 R-37 100 102.4 91.9 98.6 91.6 98.4 94.8 83.1 95.2 84.9 92.9 R-38 110.9 87.5 115.5 104.0 104.0 101.3 76.5 108.7 92.6 101.4 R-39 101.0 94.5 104.3 88.3 79.9 110.9 94.4 107.3 96.8 106.9 R-40 73.4 77.3 80.5 75.5 72.5 106.6 117.6 82.6 110.8 97.8 R-41 111.0 110.1 111.5 137.5 172.5 99.3 130.6 79.5 158.2 156.7 Clam Pass R-42 N/A 97.0 79.2 62.9 81.5 86.7 51.6 88.0 46.5 73.4 R-43 64.3 51.8 79.2 66.5 73.4 56.5 55.2 61.2 38.9 72.7 R-44 73.6 85.8 63.9 67.3 64.9 62.8 62.2 34.6 59.5 75.7 R-45 85 75.7 66.8 61.2 64.7 68.5 62.9 73.8 29.7 77.5 98.9 R-46 85 88.4 83.9 63.5 70.9 84.0 67.0 77.6 81.8 61.0 97.8 R-47 85 103.1 114.0 98.7 98.6 103.0 88.3 79.6 97.2 83.7 100.6 R-48 85 81.8 99.1 101.4 88.6 90.9 88.3 87.8 104.0 82.1 84.2 R-49 85 100.6 97.9 96.8 90.4 93.4 104.4 105.8 108.0 91.6 96.8 T-50 85 85.8 114.7 129.2 108.3 123.4 125.6 143.2 121.8 96.8 119.5 R-51 85 64.2 126.0 111.6 101.9 95.9 96.6 107.7 90.0 89.8 122.5 R-52 85 58.6 125.3 93.6 84.4 84.9 56.6 76.0 78.7 56.0 110.4 R-53 85 65.6 115.5 97.1 88.7 82.9 80.4 63.9 83.9 83.3 98.6 T-54 85 85.5 125.9 101.1 99.2 93.0 94.0 97.7 103.6 94.9 124.1 U-55 85 94.5 73.0 93.0 90.5 98.4 99.2 104.6 114.8 110.5 107.8 R-56 102.7 90.8 100.9 107.6 114.5 113.0 128.7 123.2 107.6 113.4 T-57 112.1 122.5 108.9 109.1 102.9 109.4 137,9 99.3 146.3 150.2 9 -00 0 0 N N 0.r - N O N N r 0 M L7sTANU TO GAMINE(PEM) (1) .. - U WFv1.Pn Pas. RI77 U RR •R 1!s 07 ICI 0111 •R23 ;lit . P 24 .. .R 15 4 •R16 •R:7 .RJR I 'll i ►R74 •R 3i74 i7 , ,ti_--•w r •R•k 33 3 a3 •R 3.. �".•� _.. ' �. r ,:• •R 36 •R 37 rv1 .R III Zf •`,,,, •R 3•! z 2 4R40 •Rd: Q Q .c, •.I.rn Ps.,C G n •R-41 W ``^+ —R43 O: f •P44 F 46 A pe." •p.15 CI R47 4 1. .RSR a 7 ,r4 Rai o = r •p50 V t. •as: k et IL1J ^14 51 CO i R5 Q J { 0154 ,f Cr, r •k St. 0 I -RS? 1••• !-, •41xlors IN as ,11510 ljf W a •R 5R ca •R 1,1 •R b1 i •R n3 •1164 •R 65 .R nt. •Rb7 "ty4•R k. •R 6R •R.7p •R 7, .R J: ' ..:. •R Ji -R 74 •R 75 •k 76 .R 17 •R 7R . •R 79 ,• - •R 80 1 { 0181 •R 81 • 81 RY4 Figure 4. Beach width remaining (2005 to 2009) measured from the 2003 baseline 10 Pr _ - 00 O O N N O.r 4) O —ce O a LSIANCE 1O WaltE(RE 11 N M ,, _, a'' u. n u4 4. J a _r -a r .1 a) N j wry,nsvat. (i) •p 17 0 •R 1R U •P 19 •FI t'0 •M •R 2' t r •R:3 (f -P 11 •R 25 •R 26 l''...,0 •R:7 •14!9 •P la r •P 31 -R 3: 1 -831 •N 1.1 1 •1435 CA �.1 •14114 •R 37 •R 3R Z " . ,,►, •p 19 Z4 "a• •P.ap S Q •� •R-I 1 •Clam Pass W 4841 Et .may .pas P45 I- •Rah QA c" a.'• •N 41 G mon r- rS - •R:R "c 1� '' -parr U V 1 q �.� .RSI ` Q u 4, `N S: g laJ .P.S4 2 Jta P 55 c O G . •1457 1- ui •Dari Jr.Pati •R 58.5 •R 59 E w 4161 I 1.. •P 62 •8.63 • •864 % •R65 . 4164 •R 67 •R68 •P 69 _,.....- •R 70 •H11 - •R72 .14 71 •R 74 •p75 i •874 I •14 77 ' .147E C •14 79 w •881 P-81 Figure 5. Beach width remaining (2005 to 2014) measured from the 2003 baseline 11 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 17 of 260 B. NAPLES BEACH i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay Table 3 below and Figures 4 & 5 (above) depict the shoreline change 'year to year' after the initial nourishment from 2006 to 2013. The entire monitoring area is bound by FDEP monuments R-23 through R-57 and the 2006 nourishment project area included beach fill placement from R-23 through R-37. As reflected in Table 3 and Figures 4 & 5, it is noted that for the time period from 2007 (one year post-construction) to 2008 (post-Tropical Storm Fay) Naples Beach predominantly experienced shoreline erosion. The most significant erosion was noted to be immediately south of Doctors Pass. This is a clear indication that Doctors Pass interrupts the alongshore transport of the material from north to south along the Naples Beach shoreline. Although the Naples Beach project area generally showed shoreline recession for the period from 2007 to 2008, the shoreline at R-77 showed seaward advance of the shoreline. When examining the period from 2008 to 2009 (one year following Tropical Storm Fay) there is shoreline recovery/advance at the north end of the project area (R-58 to R-67) while the south end (R-68 to R-78)reflects a similar erosion trend as 2007 to 2008. ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby Figure 5 shows that for the period from July 2011 to August 2012 (post-Tropical Storm Debbie) there was shoreline recession at the north and south ends of the Naples project area. From R-63 to R-68 there was seaward advance. The average shoreline lost over the project area from FDEP monuments R-22 to R-37 is 2.4 feet, while the average shoreline lost over the monitoring area from R-11 to R-41 for the 2011 to 2012 monitoring period is 11.5 feet. While overall the average losses are expected, there were hot spots that were very hard hit by Tropical Storm Debby. R-17 just south of Wiggins Pass lost 73.7 feet of beach width and R-20 and R-21 had significant losses over 30 feet as well. Monuments R-39 and 40 lost a significant amount beach width, approximately 35 feet at both profiles as material appears to be migrating north towards R-38, which showed a shoreline advancement of 32.2 feet. R-41 is the profile just north of Clam Pass, some of the material that migrates south from that point will be transferred into the inlet, which may explain the loss in beach width of 51.1 feet. In Park Shore R-45 to R-46 was severely impacted by the Tropical Strom Debby and lost over 40 feet of beach width. Within the entire monitoring area between Clam and Doctors Passes, R-42 to R-57, the average beach width accreted 3.9 feet during this period. The profile lines within the Park Shore project area are still performing well are between R-49 and R-57, which all but R-53 show shoreline advancement compared to the 2010 survey. 12 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 18 of 260 iii. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac For the period from 2012 to 2013 (post-Hurricane Isaac) there was a mix of shoreline recession and accretion throughout the Naples Beach project area. A comparison of the August 2012 and April 2013 surveys of Naples Beach indicate a shoreline that is trending towards stabilization. The project area (R-58A to R-79), an average loss of -2.5 feet of shoreline was observed from August 2012 to April 2013. The most significantly eroded stretches of beach in the project area are two 5,000 foot reaches from R-60 to R-65 and R-74 to R-79 with average losses of -14.7 feet and -10.9 feet respectively. The R-60 to R-65 average shoreline recession results also encompass the area from R-61 to R-63.5 which received 10,877 cubic yards of fill in a maintenance event in November 2012 after Hurricane Isaac. Without this fill the average losses for this shoreline stretch would have been much higher. Both of these stretches continued to experience more aggressive recession rates than the surrounding Naples Beach project area indicating that these areas are hot spots for erosion. Over the entire monitoring area, shoreline changes varied by as much as 63.1 feet, ranging from +28.7 feet at R-58 to -34.4 feet at R-78 since 2012. The average for the entire monitoring area was a minor seaward advance+0.9 feet. 13 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 19 of 260 Table 3. Na les Beach Width Measured From the 2003 Baseline R-Mon Design 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Standard Doctors Pass R-58A 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 R-58 100 42.4 101.5 72.2 50.0 43.0 42.0 46.5 21.3 50.0 111.9 R-59 100 71.3 142.0 123.9 103.1 98.5 96.8 101.0 83.9 97.0 117.1 R-60 100 67.8 108.2 115.0 103.1 114.5 111.5 108.5 99.7 103.6 108.8 R-61 100 81.8 125.3 127.2 117.5 149.9 137.8 139.5 131.6 106.3 120.5 T-62 100 61.3 123.4 110.8 89.8 99.9 85.8 102.8 104.2 97.4 104.6 R-63 100 90.6 120.3 95.5 99.1 106.4 88.0 88.5 105.8 71.6 116.2 R-64 100 107.9 119.2 110.2 112.0 121.9 109.6 106.9 122.1 95.5 107.3 R-65 100 111.3 135.1 116.3 115.1 121.9 114.5 103.3 126.9 127.5 124.6 R-66 100 117.5 146.5 135.8 128.7 130.5 124.4 115.2 131.0 122.4 128.7 R-67 100 159.3 183.8 176.9 160.2 151.5 150.7 152.2 164.2 172.2 174.2 R-68 100 151.4 146.3 164.5 162.9 150.0 151.7 152.3 150.7 150.5 161.5 T-69 100 116.2 140.3 150.9 140.3 123.5 130.3 132.3 116.0 135.5 148.6 R-70 100 72.0 167.5 139.9 138.8 122.9 130.1 119.5 108.5 130.3 139.6 R-71 100 64.0 177.8 145.3 138.8 129.0 131.8 125.2 112.1 123.3 143.5 R-72 100 75.7 194.5 167.4 156.1 153.9 150.2 148.7 127.6 122.2 155.4 R-73 100 85.0 128.9 155.2 156.6 149.9 150.3 147.2 125.3 126.8 153.3 R-74 100 78.8 157.3 155.4 146.6 137.5 142.0 144.8 135.6 140.1 143.7 R-75 100 91.6 135.1 110.6 125.7 139.9 139.8 127.9 135.0 134.0 116.0 R-76 100 70.0 138.2 116.8 109.7 98.0 107.5 99.9 104.3 77.7 113.1 R-77 100 82.6 136.7 124.0 116.0 107.7 110.5 124.0 132.4 107.5 115.5 R-78 100 91.5 124.2 117.6 108.5 109.9 114.7 133.5 126.0 91.6 99.9 R-79 100 84.8 81.8 100.2 81.1 99.9 110.2 101.3 108.8 126.1 105.2 R-80 93.0 101.2 96.1 89.8 88.0 117.0 111.4 104.7 117.0 112.1 R-81 101.3 99.1 94.8 85.8 91.6 88.7 97.3 98.2 117.2 115.4 R-82 73.0 58.4 70.0 69.3 80.6 60.3 64.4 73.4 89.4 82.8 R-83 48.6 43.3 50.8 61.5 66.9 57.7 45.4 51.0 70.8 55.5 R-84 29.2 34.4 43.2 44.7 52.7 51.7 67.2 43.7 59.2 53.1 C. SOUTH MARCO ISLAND i. 2007 to 2008 - Effects of Tropical Storm Fay There was a significant amount of shoreline recession that occurred towards the south end of the project area(R-147 to G-1). These monuments lost between 48 and 64 feet of shoreline at MHW. There was some accretion at the very north end at R-139 and R-140, with 37 and 67 feet of added shoreline respectively. These results can be seen below in Figure 6 and Table 4. 14 CAC September 11,2014 VU-3 Staff Reports 20 of 260 ii. 2011 to 2012- Effects of Tropical Storm Debby For the period from 2011 to 2012 (post-Tropical Storm Debby) it was noted that a very similar type of erosion occurred throughout the project area as was noted following Tropical Storm Fay. The erosion shifted slightly south of where the worst erosion occurred from Fay. R-148 through G-2 experienced erosion of similar magnitude during Debby to the erosion experienced in Fay losing between 46 and 67 feet of shoreline at MHW. SHORELINE CHANGES —2006 to 2007 —2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 —2009 to 2010 2010 to 2011 2011 to 2012 2012 to 2013 ;, 250 ti • 200 cip0 150 _ O 100 _ N 50 !--1 --- — • L -A111110100- 111111ki. 50 -100 G-5 G-4 G-3 G-2 G-1 R-148 R-147 R-146 R-145 R-144 R-143 R-142 R-141 R-140 R-139 R-Monuments Figure 6. Year to Year MHW Shoreline Change Plot for South Marco Island 15 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 21 of 260 Table 4. Year to Year MHW Shoreline Changes for South Marco Island Project Area Shoreline Changes(ft) Profile Area 2006 to 2007 to 2008 to 2009 to 2010 to 2011 to 2012 to 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 R-139 16.8 37.2 17.1 78.9 -11.4 -13.2 41.0 R-140 -0.7 67.6 16.015.4 28.9 15.0 14.2 R-141 12.9 3.2 62.7 , 12.7 2.1 -2.7 24.0 R-142 9.4 19.9 22.6 12.3 9.7 -27.3 35.2 R-143 5.7 3.2 23.3 34.0 -3.2 -38.7 42.2 R-144 25.3 0.6 18.7 3.6 3.5 5.6 -11.0 R-145 47.9 -4.4 17.7 0.7 -2.6 9.1 -14.5 R-146 87.1 1.6 7.5 -3.4 -12.5 10.7 -12.5 R-147 186.1 -48.0 -5.8 -11.8 -3.1 -12.8 83.2 R-148 196.7 -64.8 -10.2 -22.6 11.3 -52.6 158.2 G-1 203.6 -58.1 -12.2 -16.2 2.8 -67.2 176.6 . .4 G-2 8.5 -7.0 8.2 5.2 -13.3 -47.0 81.8 G-3 19.7 -5.0 9.8 -7.7 -5.7 12.9 26.7 G-4 -49.2 28.3 -18.5 9.2 -11.9 -18.9 41.3 G-5 -3.6 15.5 -0.4 -1.5 3.3 0.1 -2.8 CAXAMBAS PASS K-1 0.0 122.2 13.7 6.3 -57.2 46.8 -41.8 K-2 7.8 1.1 27.3 -59.8 4.8 -5.4 14.4 AVERAGES PER REACH NORTH OF FILL 11.6 22.0 26.7 26.2 4.9 -10.2 24.3 R-139 TO R-144 PROJECT AREA 144.3 -34.7 -0.6 -10.7 -0.8 -22.6 78.2 R-145 TO G-1 _ _ SOUTH OF FILL/GROINS -6.2 8.0 -0.2 1.3 -6.9 -13.2 36.8 G-2 TO G-5 - KICE ISLAND 3.9 61.7 20.5 -26.8 4.8 -5.4 14.4 K-1 TO K-2 MONITORING AREA 51.1 -0.7 10.4 7.3 -0.1 -15.1 45.6 R-139 TO G-5 *2006 and 2007 profiles show no emergent land at present shoreline location 16 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 22 of 260 The following Figures 7-9 are examples of the yearly changes in beach width compared to the design standard which further details the shoreline changes over the period from 2005 to 2014. Feb.2014 Fill Placement t1,339cy(Jan.2014) (125.0 ft) Net Chance 15.2 ft R-30 April 2013 (109.8 ) -6.7 ft Hurricane Isaac(Sept.2012) (11 .5 ft) Aug.2012 —Tropical Storm Debbie(June 2012) 9.0 ft (107.5 ft July 2011 ----_. ------ -5.1 ft Sept.2010 t _ __ (113. ft) } -11.9 ft July 2009 _ (124.9 ft) 16.2 ft Sept.2008 ' (108.7 ) Tropical Storm Fay(Aug.2008) -22.1 ft (130.8 ft) June 2007 -10.2 ft June 2006 141.b k) i Fill Placement�,956cy(May 206) Hurricane Wil a(Oct.2005) iI 31.3 ft (109.7- Sept.2005 _.. ___.._ 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Beach Width from 2003 Baseline(ft) Design Standard --MHWL(+0.33ft NAVD88) Figure 7. Yearly Changes in Beach Width Compared to the Design Standard for R-30 (Vanderbilt) 17 "AC leptember 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 23 of 260 Feb.2014 . Fill Placement-11,293cy(Jan.,2014) (97.8 ft) Net Change 36.9 ft R-46 (61.O ft March 2013 32.O ft Hurricane Isaa:(Sept.2012) (81.8 ft) Aug.2012 Tropical Storm Debbie(June 2C 12) -48.6 ft July 2011 -- ----— ------...._+.–.___._ (77.6 ft 10.6 ft Sept.2010 (67.0 ft) -17.0 ft (84.0 ft) July 2009 13.1 ft (70.9 ft) Sept.2008 Tropical Storm Fay(Aug.2008) 7.4 ft June 2007 - (63.5 ft -20.4 ft June 2006 -- _ 83.9 k) _ Fill Placement 72,016cy(May 2006) Hurricane Wil4ra(Oct.2005) -4.5 ft (88.4 k) Sept.2005 0 25 50 75 85 100 125 150 175 200 Beach Width from 2003 Baseline{ft) -Design Standard tMHWL(+0.33ft NAVD88) Figure 8. Yearly Changes in Beach Width Compared to the Design Standard for R-46 (Park Shore) 18 CAC September 11,2014 VH-3 Staff Reports 24 of 260 Feb.2014 Fill Placement-17,858cy(Jan.2014) (104.6 ft) Net Change 7.1 ft R-62 March2013 (97.4ft) -6.8 ft Hurricane Isaac(Sept.2012) (104.2 ft) Aug.2012 Tropical Storm Debbie(June 201.2) Fill Placement-10,700cy Naples 1.4 ft Beach(2012) (102.8 ft) July 2011 Fill Placement-16,602cy Naples Beach(March 2011) 17.0 ft (85.8 ft Sept.2010 -14.2 ft July 2009 (99.9 ft) 10.2 ft Sept.2008 ----- (89.8 ft Tropical Storm Fay(Aug.2008) Doctors Pass Dredge&Fill-32,551w -21.0 ft 8.60 to 8-62(Ma h 2011) (110.8 ft� June 2007 -12.6 ft June 2006 — __. Fill Placement-2,568cy(May 2006) (123.4 ft) Doctors Pass Dredge&Fill-53,630c9 R-60 to R-62(March 2006) 62.1 ft Sept.2005 Hurricane Wilma(Oct.2005) ( (61.3 ft 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Beach Width from 2003 Baseline(ft) —Design Standard -MHWL(+0.33ft NAVD88) Figure 9. Yearly Changes in Beach Width Compared to the Design Standard for R-62 (Naples) V. VOLUME CHANGES a. INTRODUCTION The volumetric changes provided in this analysis depict the differences in the amount of sand between two chosen profile lines. The difference in area between two sets of survey data are taken along each profile line and the net volume change between the two profiles is calculated based on the distance between profiles. This method of volume computation is commonly known as an Average End Area Method (AEAM). Volumetric changes were calculated between the dunes at the upland extent of the profile and the approximate depth of closure at the seaward extent(-11.3 feet NAVD 88). The volume remaining from the nourishment event and each year after construction are reported in these tables and depicted in Figure 10. b. VANDERBILT, PELICAN BAY & PARK SHORE 19 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 25 of 260 i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay For the period from 2007 (one-year post-construction) to 2008 (post-Tropical Storm Fay) Vanderbilt experienced an overall loss in volume (-35,820 cubic yards) while Pelican Bay experienced an overall accretion in volume (23,491 cubic yards) which resulted in a net volumetric loss of 12,330 cubic yards. Immediately north of Clam Pass (R-40 to R-42) there was a net accretion of over 30,000 cubic yards of material. Part of this volume (-20,000 cubic yards) was from a Clam Pass maintenance dredge and placement event conducted in 2008. Park Shore (R-45 to R-55) experienced an overall gain of 38,822 cubic yards. The reach from Pelican Bay to Doctors Pass (R-30 to R-42) experienced overall gain of 74,288 cubic yards (See Figure 7 and Table 4 below). Although the shoreline change for the period of 2007 to 2008 showed an overall retreat due to the effects Tropical Storm Fay and examination of the profiles and the volume changes reflect the development of a very distinct offshore bar generally between -3 feet and -10 feet NAVD. This is generally consistent with a 'pre- and post-storm' profile comparison. Material is generally eroded from the upper portion of the profile and deposited offshore. An examination of the 2008 and 2009 time period shows how the beaches changed in the year following Tropical Storm Fay. For the period from 2008 (post-Tropical Storm Fay) to 2009 (three-year post-construction) Vanderbilt experienced an overall accretion in volume (7,780 cubic yards) while Pelican Bay experienced an overall loss in volume (-20,624, cubic yards) which resulted in a net volumetric loss of 12,845 cubic yards. Park Shore (R-45 to R- 55) experienced an overall loss of 48,490 cubic yards. As reflected in Figure 7 and Table 4 below the year following the erosion/accretion patterns from 2008 to 2009 are generally a `mirror image' of the 2007 to 2008. ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby For the period from 2011 to 2012 (post-Debby) Vanderbilt experienced an overall gain in volume (44,505 cubic yards) while Pelican Bay experienced an overall gain in volume (22,688 cubic yards) which resulted in a net volumetric gain of 67,192 cubic yards. The reach from Pelican Bay to Clam Pass (R-36 to R-42) experienced a volumetric gain of 43,679 cubic yards. Park Shore (R-45 to R-55) experienced an overall gain in volume of 25,500 cubic yards. iii. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac For the period from 2012 to 2013 (Hurricane Isaac) Vanderbilt experienced an overall loss in volume (-59,498 cubic yards) while Pelican Bay experienced an overall loss in volume (- 20 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 26 of 260 36,912 cubic yards) which resulted in a net volumetric loss of -96,410 cubic yards. The reach from Pelican Bay to Clam Pass (R-36 to R-42) experienced a volumetric loss of - 60,018 cubic yards. Park Shore (R-45 to R-55) experienced an overall loss in volume of - 34,070 cubic yards. C. NAPLES BEACH i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay For the period from 2007 (one-year post-construction) to 2008 (post-Tropical Storm Fay) the Naples Beach area experienced erosion (-42,548 cubic yards) at the north end of the project area from R-58A to R-63. This area of erosion is attributable to the effects of Doctors Pass. From R-64 to R-79 (south end of project area) there was both erosion and accretion with a net volumetric loss of -20,304 cubic yards. The Naples Beach area experienced an overall volumetric loss of -33,225 cubic yards. There was a hot-spot of erosion that developed from R-67 to R-72 for this survey timeframe, but the subsequent years from 2008 through 2010 this same area showed accretion and recovery from Fay. iv. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby For the period from 2011 to 2012 (post-Tropical Storm Debby) Naples Beach experienced similar erosion/accretion patterns as observed for the 2007 to 2008 period. The Naples Beach area experienced an overall volumetric loss of-52,452 cubic yards. There is a stretch of seven reaches in a row that show erosion in the northern project area from R-58A to R- 64. The nourishment volume has been lost to Tropical Storm Debby and looking at the dry beach portion of profiles R-58A and R-58 indicates that the erosion from Debby was more than 5-times the volume gained in the same section by nourishment in 2011. R-60 to R-64 lost significant material from the entire beach profile as well as T-87 to R-89. This loss is echoed in the dry beach volume losses. As in Park Shore, in the Naples reach we see accelerated erosion south of Doctors Pass and immediately north of Gordon Pass. v. 2012 to 2013 Effects of Hurricane Isaac For the period from 2012 to 2013 (post-Hurricane Isaac)Naples Beach experienced an overall volumetric gain totaling 36,607 cubic yards. After removing the 10,877 cubic yards placed in the Naples Beach upland fill project Nov/Dec 2012, or about+1.9 cubic yards gain in material per linear foot. The reach with the largest loss of material occurred between R- 63 to R-64 (-4,499 cubic yards) and the reach with the largest gain of material occurred between R-74 to R-75 (7,058 cubic yards). The Naples Beach project experienced accretion ranging from 871 cubic yards (R-58 to R-59) to 7,058 cubic yards (R-74 to R-75) from 2012 and 2013. The project area also experienced losses ranging from-1,580 cubic yards (R-76 to R-77) to -4,499 cubic yards (R-63 to R-64). Evaluating the results of the 2012 and 2013 survey, reach R-63 to R-64 and R-71 to R-72 have seen the largest losses above the depth of closure. The area south of the project area from R-79 to R-84 has seen solid gains in volume over the 2012-2013 timeframe. 21 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 27 of 260 I I - S I I N-- 11 II -). I I I I Pelican Naples Beath I I Park Shore I I Rat' Vanderbilt _._ _ 4. II II II II I. 11 II -Y II 1n I Iol is I11 ISI I^'1 114 i II II - - 10 V l l' II II 11 II o Iea II O 01 4 - • , IN ' / 4. „: , .., , , • • I 1} I I, 4 � `1 4 , r..L_I- — _ 1 ___ —_, L -1„o3,3 11 I II II II II L_1-- _____.__ II -20000 II I I II it -200S to 200" -....2006 to 2007 2007 to 2004' -2008 to 2009 -2009 to 2010 I -30 000 fe 41 0y q'h �1 1c) ,y'1 1y ,0 .,'S es 3'1 kto 4', c0'� loft �' yb hS' 9ti rr0 p6 pb 9,a aya is. .,, .,-'1 My ,,,,, .,,,, .LN .0 ip ti3 P % J' ? H Q' Q Q % Q; c' Q ? % P C %. 1' @' 'S' P Q F Q 1: E * %. Q-' C; T P" P 2' 4:94,.e.%." a0 ,. ao 1'. 0 0'4'.' O %�O Dao oto e" ,Lao 0�0 dao �y��o Pio , �t0,,�o )s": .SSP ,a 4). 4, .gP 'kJ"'IP, 4, ,i, vb O1.?' ,i), � b � � � -0.' 4 A% ,1;1:? �0 Qb 0' b• b Ph S h h a A 4 ? C R-Nlonun'ents Figure 10. Year to Year Volume Change 2005 to 2010 22 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 28 of 260 I I I I 4....._ s N I I I i --4. i i i I Pelican Naples Beach 1 1 .4( Park Shore Ip. I I ElaY Vanderbilt II II It II I II I a 2 I..I I I \ 1 III 11: I ti\NI.' 11 I I I It I I I , I I r , icr r.rtK .,A A / , l' :\ 1 /1\14.'• 'IA: 'I ' r."\IA \ ''''''': \ii\i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I -a > -io wo 'i -20 ON I I I I I I •—i-20Mito 2006 .-2010t'2011 2011to 2012 2012 to 2013 2010t.2014 - -30 000 itf) s„$.',i.‘"1.,:i\1p",c,„: ,sp`',trO,50`"4.0 4..si‘,1.4'le 1,,,•0,!•4*01..,1/44)c.rti,.14ki wtstii 9.0*41.S' ;4°),...‘‘c,.:41%"'42.?,z.,,l,,;'1:‘ z.. i i.0.ic.0,.....9,NC._,..0,...e vai ii k. cl:i.0,t7.9 e,..9 ,s9_...0,.,,c,. .0 4,,...9,....9....0„s9,v..9 z,...0„No .7"e,N.c.,...0,29 1,..6,....0 e;k9..,.9,,,..0 t:S. .P eg ,'S°,'. ,:,\ e..:N e.,1\ ,,,,.. ,, e:d.,Se e.W e,p'pc,‘ 3.',,,..5'4'4,,,t"',,,t. e:07 e„t:' °,?,eg e,"?e?) e.:Y.9,"', Q;17 e.:1, R-Monuments Figure 11. Year to Year Volume Change 2011 to 2013 23 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 29 of 260 Table 5. Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay &Park Shore Volume Changes to the Depth of Closure Monument 2005 to 2006 to 2007 to 2008 to 2009 to 2010 to 2011 to 2012 to 2013 to 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 R-22 to R-23 1,648 -143 233 2,365 645 -1,845 4,694 N/A N/A R-23 to R-24 6,791 560 -4,406 2,605 6,012 -5,039 10,686 -10,856 6,864 R-24 to R-25 8,047 -290 -2,972 1,814 3,444 -3,048 7,255 -12,299 6,127 R-25 to R-26 14,780 -2,039 -3,549 1,893 3,276 -4,223 5,115 -13,160 9,775 R-26 to R-27 19,619 1,532 -11,354 1,323 4,388 -5,433 5,271 -10,982 17,344 R-27 to R-28 6,664 1,153 -3,486 253 187 -1,396 881 -3,046 6,214 R-28 to R-29 14,096 -1,273 -3,601 -1,291 36 -2,637 -1,128 -3,474 11,077 R-29 to R-30 10,827 -1,655 -6,070 -1,808 -2,645 -2,778 4,186 571 6,089 R-30 to R-31 38 1,516 -614 441 -2,054 -5,028 6,506 -5,623 8,675 R-31 to R-32 3,817 1,918 4,450 -2,793 205 -3,537 4,636 -8,509 9,440 R-32 to R-33 8,094 -2,880 6,249 -5,609 1,261 -2,918 3,614 -5,647 3,068 R-33 to R-34 7,959 -3,457 5,072 -3,457 1,501 -4,635 8,130 -9,137 3,343 R-34 to R-35 9,185 -3,043 1,660 -2,988 -148 -1,844 7,120 -8,152 6,124 R-35 to R-36 6,839 -3,586 2,440 -3,808 1,017 -2,791 -1,719 -2,200 8,762 R-36 to R-37 450 -3,815 3,620 -3,150 59 -4,168 -372 -3,267 5,439 R-37 to R-38 -7,029 958 7,228 -6,668 -885 -3,234 6,848 -9,360 3,271 R-38 to R-39 -6,981 2,005 9,251 -10,557 4,578 -2,705 11,541 -14,227 5,487 R-39 to R-40 -1,943 2,876 4,539 -6,855 7,639 1,457 4,856 -6,052 2,167 R-40 to R-41 -3,183 -1,535 14,323 -5,130 1,648 -936 5,280 -7,920 6,497 R-41 to R-42 -9,209 -11,002 16,071 -3,276 -5,866 -3,298 14,012 -19,192 5,955 Clam Pass R-42 to R-43 -4,606 2,891 992 -4,454 -4,471 2,572 1,799 -7,732 1,614 R-43 to R-44 1,549 3,633 4,537 -9,222 -3,578 6,179 -10,015 1,715 4,795 R-44 to R-45 -369 -3,724 5,721 -7,603 -1,067 5,004 -8,379 7,370 4,441 R-45 to R-46 -5,612 -696 5,284 -5,223 -2,704 2,888 -3,543 7,558 8,193 R-46 to R-47 -2,846 1,279 3,909 -6,250 -4,899 2,990 3,332 -1,261 2,540 R-47 to R-48 2,934 1,950 -932 -4,540 -3,245 4,816 6,197 -7,060 -1,588 R-48 to R-49 2,961 0 1,125 -3,731 -809 6,120 4,896 -7,483 3,198 R-49 to T-50 6,792 3,959 522 543 -543 4,923 3,155 -7,073 10,610 T-50 to R-51 24,203 3,690 -1,623 1,796 -2,607 4,526 -369 -8,142 15,840 R-51 to R-52 17,746 -5,096 4,490 -4,588 -3,294 3,359 -164 -6,178 12,765 R-52 to R-53 12,529 -5,353 8,960 -10,531 -3,918 -19 2,715 -3,704 13,867 R-53 to T-54 5,645 -3,031 9,013 -11,172 -832 -1,585 4,437 -1,367 9,211 T-54 to U-55 -716 -1,936 8,074 -5,983 1,762 987 3,679 639 5,557 U-55 to R-56 -7,126 3,469 7,639 -3,196 3,435 1,025 2,205 -3,452 2,820 R-56 to T-57 -2,117 1,947 5,030 -6,181 2,941 5,314 -2,188 -2,600 2,572 24 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 30 of 260 Table 6. Naples Beach Volume Changes to the Depth of Closure Monument 2005 to 2006 to 2007 to 2008 to 2009 to 2010 to 2011 to 2012 to 2013 to 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Doctors Pass R-58A to R-58 N/A N/A -3,665 -1,517 -233 3,610 -3,233 5,614 24,836 . R-58 to R-59 11,780 -10,182 -13,377 2,360 -5,282 2,487 -635 871 25,647 R-59 to R-60 9,559 -4,579 -9,639 20,784 -11,366 -1,325 -1,647 1,406 2,450 R-60 to R-61 10,243 -4,524 -4,643 32,522 -17,038 -2,770 -8,389 2,351 -1,475 R-61 to T-62 18,746 -6,022 -5,928 14,857 -9,156 4,701 -9,420 3,851 1,586 T-62 toR-63 14,704 -9,181 -2,855 4,161 -2,295 1,325 -5,131 1,586 11,849 R-63 to R-64 5,420 -5,398 1,536 4,938 -922 -3,555 -3,358 -4,499 18,785 R-64 to T-65 -883 246 1,868 2,707 -608 -2,244 1,448 825 2,620 T-65 to R-66 3,376 -5,315 4,338 4,261 -1,451 -1,848 2,872 3,864 -1,497 R-66 to R-67 7,490 -5,818 607 5,640 -207 -1,717 548 3,346 518 R-67 to R-68 1,841 -614 -1,018 4,296 1,542 -1,961 -1,467 4,550 1,048 R-68 to T-69 -1,996 1,411 -870 2,266 1,471 -1,036 -3,122 3,977 3,122 T-69 to R-70 1,654 -3,160 -3,056 2,909 2,126 -1,550 -1,211 3,750 3,204 R-70 to 1 -71 9,268 -5,198 -3,594 3,847 1,782 -1,560 45 535 5,748 R-71 to R-72 16,394 -2,066 -2,646 1,605 -431 149 -907 -4,013 8,650 R-72 to R-73 8,815 1,156 1,111 285 -706 2,027 -4,836 2,328 3,349 R-73 to R-74 3,878 2,173 -75 211 1,766 2,233 -2,943 5,191 2,067 R-74 to R-75 -2,747 -1,651 2,280 1,637 1,242 424 0 7,058 -1,622 R-75 to R-76 -3,332 -4,102 1,836 1,881 1,688 -1,244 -977 5,464 -133 R-76 to R-77 3,294 -753 -2,363 -458 5,509 118 -118 -1,580 5,937 R-77 to R-78 -3,174 113 2,919 -779 3,826 5,965 -5,384 -2,777 6,433 R-78 to R-79 -14,628 3,273 4,010 4,358 327 6,076 -7,201 3,785 7,140 R-79 to R-80 -18,948 -554 3,215 5,280 1,895 3,002 -5,258 12,305 -1,086 R-80 to R-81 -8,168 -5,513 2,388 2,020 1,994 2,134 -1,270 3,671 -2,528 R-81 to R-82 -11,759 -4,748 • 3,116 2,448 -1,168 1,020 4,618 1,447 612 R-82 to R-83 -19,721 1,041 9,074 1,162 -5,082 1,476 3,533 557 5,178 R-83 to R-84 -13,914 2,061 7,215 -213 -1,510 3,447 -2,399 3,376 391 25 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 31 of 260 D. SOUTH MARCO ISLAND i. 2007 to 2008 Effects of Tropical Storm Fay For the period from 2007 (post-construction) to 2008 (post-Tropical Storm Fay) the South Marco Island area experienced slight accretion at the middle of the project area from R-145 to R-146. From R-146 to G-1 (south end of project area) erosion was observed. South of the project area was slightly erosional but generally stable throughout this period. ii. 2011 to 2012 Effects of Tropical Storm Debby For the period from 2011 to 2012 (post-Tropical Storm Debby) South Marco Island beach experienced erosion throughout the project area and beyond to the extents of the monitoring area (R-140 to G-5). VOLUME CHANGES -2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009 2009 to 2010 —2010 to 2011 2011 to 2012 2012 to 2013 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 — — U eu 30,000 U 20,000 10,000 .. ._ L.. �...�� 0 _- . - i �- „ist -10,000 ____- __. 1\4 --__.._-- -20,000 -30,000 G-5 G-4 G-3 G-2 G-1 R-148 R-147 R-146 R-145 R-144 R-143 R-142 R-141 R-140 R-139 R-Monuments Figure 12. Year to Year Volume Change Plot for South Marco Island 26 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 32 of 260 Table 7. Year to Year Volume Change Summary for South Marco Island Effective Volumetric Changes(CY) Profile Area Distance 2006 to 2007 to 2008 to 2009 to 2010 to 2011 to 2012 to (ft) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 R-139 429 317 9,810 7,032 9,968 -524 3,825 1,381 R-140 1,038 6,606 18,435 19,203 11,829 9,179 4,455 9,794 R-141 1,101 14,380 11,162 19,594 8,962 4,155 3,381 1,670 R-142 1,047 5,307 6,934 12,319 9,685 1,278 2,634 -5,966 R-143 1,079 5,549 4,431 7,146 18,564 -4,990 -2,954 2,076 R-144 525 4,487 4,138 2,370 2,098 1,379 -3,691 2,117 R-145 992 14,608 12,186 4,882 1,321 -1,652 -2,936 -4,037 R-146 964 36,096 4,280 8,418 2,104 -6,456 -927 -8,560 R-147 926 65,029 -10,073 -1,233 34 -8,189 -6,030 25,594 R-148 977 62,249 -17,243 -3,832 -6,181 -4,591 -13,700 53,573 G-1* - - - - - - - - G-2^ 45 408 1,419 -87 -539 396 168 351 G-3^ 138 674 3,237 -419 -1,481 802 -965 1,981 G-4^ 213 -3,026 3,208 -2,538 -1,159 961 -694 1,001 G-5^ 120 -2,038 4,058 -3,774 -2,899 2,651 475 -2,717 CAXAMBAS PASS K-1+ 822 -31,053 14,355 -61,436 -1,460 -12,652 -20,499 -35,189 K-2+ 822 152 15,602 -35,767 5,657 -9,185 -15,085 -15,694 NORTH OF FILL 4,694 32,160 50,772 65,294 59,008 9,098 11,342 8,955 R-139 TO R-143 PROJECT AREA 4,384 182,469 -6,713 10,604 -624 -19,508 -27,285 68,686 R-144 TO R-148 SOUTH OF FILL/GROINS 516 -3,982 11,922 -6,817 -6,078 4,810 -1,015 616 G-2 TO G-5 KICE ISLAND 1,644 -30,901 29,958 -97,203 4,197 -21,837 -35,584 -50,883 K-1 TO K-2 MONITORING AREA 9,594 210,647 55,981 69,081 52,307 -5,600 -16,959 78,257 R-139 TO G-5 27 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 33 of 260 VI. THE EFFECT OF STORMS ON EROSION RATES The yearly erosion rates are compared to the average erosion rate from 2008 to 2011. The years from 2008 to 2011 were used as the baseline, because 2006-2008 surveys were still showing signs of the profiles equilibrating from the 2006 nourishment event. 2012-2013 results were removed from the baseline average due to Tropical Storm Debby and Hurricane Isaac. Erosion rates were normalized by the time period in months between the surveys to insure results were not skewed by the different intervals between surveys. i. Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay Beach Erosion Rates Vanderbilt Beach had an average erosion rate of-0.5 cy/ft/yr from 2008 to 2011. From 2011 to 2012 Vanderbilt saw accretion at 4.5 cy/ft/yr after Tropical Storm Debby. Over the last 9 month period, Vanderbilt saw a loss of volume at a rate of 11.1 cy/ft/yr due to Hurricane Isaac; which not only took away any gain in volume from Debby, but also was 20 times the average erosion rate for the project area. Figure 13 depicts the yearly erosion rate compared to the benchmark average erosion rate for Vanderbilt Beach. 28 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 34 of 260 Comparison of Yearly Erosion Rates to the 2008-2011 Average for Vanderbilt(R-23 to R-31) N=Vea,y Erosion Rate ICY/FT/VRI -Average Erosion Rate 1-0.5 CY/FT/YR) 4 g 10 O O 6 0 O J o Figure 13. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Vanderbilt Beach Figure 14 shows the yearly erosion rate in comparison to the benchmark average erosion rate for Pelican Bay Beach. The beach experienced an average erosion rate of-2.9 cy/ft/yr from 2008 to 2011 and from 2011 to 2012 also saw an increase in volume from Tropical Storm Debby of 3.2 cy/ft/yr. Pelican Bay also had a reversal after Hurricane Isaac like Vanderbilt, losing volume at a rate of 9.1 cy/ft/yr from 2012 to 2013, a rate 3 times the normal average erosion rate. 29 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 35 of 260 Comparison of Yearly Erosion Rates to the 2008-2011 Average for Pelican Bay(R-31 to R-37) Yearly Erosion Rate LCY/FUYR) —Average Eros on Rate(-2.9 CY/FT/YR) a Z 111Ii o G r 3 ....._...___._..— Figure 14. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Pelican Bay Beach ii. Park Shore Beach Erosion Rates Park Shore Beach had an average erosion rate of -1.4 cy/ft/yr from 2008 to 2011. The beach accreted sand from 2010 to 2011 at a rate of +3.2 cy/ft/yr and from 2011 to 2012 Park Shore experienced accretion at+2.1 cy/ft/yr even with losses from Tropical Storm Debby. Over the last 9 month period, Park Shore saw a loss of volume at a rate of-4.8 cy/yr after Hurricane Isaac; this rate of loss take a big portion of the gains from the two previous time periods away and is more than three times the average erosion rate. Figure 15 depicts the yearly erosion rate compared to the benchmark average erosion rate for Park Shore. 30 wessiegalliianow CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 36 of 260 Comparison of Yearly Erosion Rates to the 2008-2011 Average for Park Shore(R-45 to U-55) Yearly Volumetric Crosson Rate ICV/FT/YR) . -Average Erosion Rate 1-1.4 CY/FT/YR) 4 3 a -1 -z 45 -5 I ' a v 5 S S S S S 0 0 0 0 0 a0 P O S O N N N Figure 15. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Park Shore Beach iii. Naples Beach Erosion Rates Naples Beach had an average erosion rate which was actually an accretion rate of+1.7 ft/yr from 2008 to 2011. The beach eroded at a rate of -2.6 cy/yr from 2011 to 2012 (Tropical Storm Debby) but over the last nine month period, Naples Beach saw another gain in volume at a rate of+3.69 cy/ft/yr after Hurricane Isaac; this indicates that in Naples Beach Isaac actually moved sand back onshore that eroded during Tropical Storm Debby. Figure 16 shows the trend of accretion in 2013 compared to the benchmark average erosion rate for Naples Beach. 31 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 37 of 260 Comparison of Yearly Erosion Rates to the 2008-2011 Average for Naples Beach(R-58A to R-79) mlYearly Crosion Rate ICY.IFTIYR) -Average Erosion Rate 1+1.7 CY/FT(YR) 6 z ■ d O 0 8 � V Figure 16. Yearly Erosion Rate Compared to Average Erosion Rate for Naples Beach VII. SUMMARY Analysis of the Collier County shoreline indicates that similar trends are found in how the beach responds to storms. In response to Tropical Storm Fay, Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay Beaches lost an average of 14.5 and 11.7 feet, while Park Shore and Naples fared a little better, but still had a loss of shoreline at MHW. As significant as loss of shoreline width in along the northern Collier Beaches was, Marco Island lost a staggering 34.7 feet of beach width attributable to Tropical Storm Fay and adjustment of the beach after nourishment. The shoreline response to Tropical Storm Debby was similar with small losses in Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore and Naples rangeign from 1.9 to 5.2 feet of average shoreline loss. And as in 2008, Marco Island again had severe loss of shoreline averaging 22.6 feet. The Collier County beaches saw an average shoreline recession during Hurricane Isaac of 11.9 feet on Vanderbilt Beach and 9.4 feet and Pelican Bay Beach, while the Park Shore and Naples Beach segments of the project saw an average shoreline recession of 3.0 and 2.5 feet respectively. 32 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 38 of 260 Collier County Beaches - Average Mean High Water Shoreline Changes (feet) 2005 Fill T.S. T.S. Hurricane Truck 2014 Pre-Con Event Fay Debby Isaac Haul Final Beach 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2013- Beach Beach Reach Width 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Width Vanderbilt Beach 101.3 +37.4 -5.3 -14.5 +1.0 +3.8 -5.8 -2.7 -11.9 +23.3 122.1 (R-23 to R-31) _ Pelican Bay 92.8 +22.5 -5.3 -11.7 +11.9 +4.7 -3.4 -1.9 -9.4 +12.5 102.9 (R-31 to R-37) Park Shore 82.2 +30.9 -8.6 -5.5 +2.3 -5.0 4.9 -5.2 -3.0 +21.2 105.6 (R-45 to R-55) Naples Beach 86.5 +56.5 -9.2 -7.7 -0.2 -1.4 -0.1 -4.3 -2.5 +18.6 128.2 (R-58 to R-79) South Marco Island 144.3 -34.7 -0.6 -10.7 -0.8 -22.6 78.2 - (R-145 to G-1) The volume of beach fill lost above the depth of closure from Hurricane Isaac in Vanderbilt Beach was -68,941 cubic yards, in Pelican Bay it totaled -36,912 cubic yards of erosion volume and Park Shore lost -34,070 cubic yards due to the storm. Naples Beach actually reversed the trend and gained sand as Hurricane Isaac passed totaling 36,607 cubic yards of volume gained in the project area. The Vanderbilt and Naples Beach volumes are corrected to account for the upland fill placed on the beach after Hurricane Isaac and prior to the April 2013 survey. Aside from the gains in Naples Beach, there was a total loss of-103,316 cubic yards in Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay and Park Shore. Collier County Beaches - Volume Changes in Cubic Yards Fill T.S. Truck Event T.S.Fay Debby Hurricane Haul 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- Isaac 2013- 2005- Beach Reach 2006* 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012-2013 2014 2014 Vanderbilt Beach 108,642 -639 -35,820 7,595 13,292 -31,429 43,466 -58,871 62,722 10,437 (R-23 to R-31) Pelican Bay 78,858 -14,864 23,491 -21,805 3,894 -19,893 21,409 -36,912 36,175 4,640 (R-31 to R-37) Park Shore 93,593 -5,235 38,822 -49,680 -21,089 29,006 24,335 -34,070 80,193 12,592 (R-45 to R-55) Naples Beach 296,568 -60,190 -33,225 112,770 -28,415 8,304 -55,067 47,847 119,384 9,343 (R-58 to R-79) South Marco Island 182,469 -6,713 10,604 -624 -19,508 -27,285 68,686 -(R-145 to G-1) TOTAL 577,661 101,541 -13,446 59,484 -32,942 -33,520 6,857 -13,683 298,474 37,012 * Volumes as identified by Coastal Planning&Engineering(2010). The comparison of the 2012-2013 erosion/accretion rates to the three-year averages from 2008-2011 also depict how much additional erosion Hurricane Isaac caused over and above the typical yearly losses. After some initial equalization in the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Areas in the year following construction, the beach width had stabilized with the help of small 33 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 39 of 260 maintenance nourishment projects to address erosion hotspots. When Tropical Storm Debby hit the area in June 2012, and then Hurricane Isaac followed closely behind in August 2012, shoreline recession was seen throughout the County's beaches, and much of the added beach width from the 2006 nourishment event is gone in the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay and Park Shore project areas. Naples Beach has regained some of the volume lost last year from Tropical Storm Debby and performed better than the areas to the north, but still has isolated hotspots which require nourishment. When Tropical Storm Fay impacted the Collier coastline, there was impact but the three years following there were no strong storms, so the beach was able to recover better. It was also closer to the nourishment event in 2006 so more sand was available to absorb the impacts of Fay. The analysis shows that when given the opportunity the beach will recover after large storms. The type of storm (wind vs rain event), severity, and wind/wave direction also are factors that Also areas that have been nourished, or have a good natural buffer of fill available absorb the storm impacts better than those areas that are sand-starved. 34 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 40 of 260 VIII. REFERENCES Atkins, Inc., Collier County Beach Renourishment Project Four Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report, March 2011 Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Collier County Beach Renouishment Project Two Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report, September 2009 Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Collier County Beach Renourishment Project Three Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report,June 2010 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Joint Coastal Permit for Collier County Beach Renourishment Project. Permit No. 0222355-001-JC. January 12, 2005. NASA, Hurricane Isaac Imagery,The data used in this effort were acquired as part of the activities of NASA's Science Mission Directorate, and are archived and distributed by the Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center(DISC). 35 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 41 of 260 APPENDIX A-COMPARATIVE PROFILES 36 0 1 1 I I I o LO coN- O — NV O O O _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N0 - — Lf) CD I O N 0...- - a) 0 IX NO � m 34 0 N M a> 0 r) U '0 Q U O , .1 0 0 v o M O � O co C ca C N CO if 0 Ca — O _ 45, 4ti U °a a) i N cu 0 7 , . 0 O 0 LO0 0 0 U, U) 0 0 LOO t() 0 0 IO N I I (88GAVN 11) uolleAeI 0 I 1 I I I N. oo Ll) O O CO O N_ V O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N i O I — Lo 11 co i O O O N N O)O ''- M o a> CO 00 a(1) I.2. O o fn > Q I U 6 0 v i. 0 0 /1/), o Ln M _ O 61) o J/ co U om) N � ) 5 0 / / O O O 0 in 1 0 0 0 LoO 0 inO I[) O Lf) O Lo N I 1 (880AVN ll) uoilene�3 i I .w. 0 I I I I I O8 LC) CO 1.- CO 0) O ,- N M V' O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N O _ to O I O ,r .c c• o O 0 CD 0 0 N N Q 4- � o 1' 0 m tr.) E N M N > I o O toc U '( o ( Ln v 0 0 v �r uoj M //' __ O N O ., 75 j N I� M (6 1 CD H ' E O f o C 7/1 17 it o / / dr a f�/ O // O �if /,, L f O 1/4I O In 1 0 0 in O O Lr>U) O Lf) O t10 _O nN 1 1 (880AVN 14) uogene 0 I I I I I o • CO 1..... CO O) O Y- N M V 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N 0 CO 1 O x- r CSO O 1O I N CI 1) 0 i • W Lo 0 d as Lc) a) M O N> it J O O COU U 0 v r ' o o in / M / O N ' O C 1 M75 in j N !r1 CO mV 1OE t-ii)Lc: N O U N C I c6 N o 0 71411°101,11/' %I o '/ \` o 1 0 in 1 0 0 i 0 Loi 0 0 Lo O in O (0 _0 LON I I (88aAvN 4) uNena13 0 I I 1 I I O0 to a) N- CO0 0 O c- N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N ' 0 LO Ii O CO 0 0 N N 0..- N 0 h5 CO 10 li o O w II to U Q U o in v 0 0 .4- o co (il O N O C co z H `�'• t6 co m Lo E N O �I LL �/ a c to m 2// o /I `�i o to ,d 0 to 1 0 0 O to 0 0 Lo O to O L O to I 1 1 I (89GAVN i}) uogeA00 O I I I I I O Co CO N- CO 0) 0 - N CO .71- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N 0 ,i Ln CO i O V O ,-- CO 0 O N N O.v.- CV O CC C` i•.• • O - 1. LA CV CO CD M D ( O a) o co 1 to 0 U 7' : v co 1 ul fl O C 11 O M j N !!` C6 H " LO E CID N I/� o I/ N C j� C6 y 00 ,, o il (- 4r"; LO ?, O O 1' 1 0 0 0 U) 0 ,- _o U) O L() O Ln O L))CV 1 1 (89aAvN 11) uogen813 0 I I I I I 1 O (O CO I� CO Cr) 0 a- N M7 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N i 0 (O 0 0 CO 0 0 N N CL 0 O '- IX00 0 N E M 5 = 0 N Ur U (oo II; // ao / o H/ Lc) M .�II N O c O M N H ,s� co CO `i N E O O U ! Nc m / (0n itioli o �l 17 j ' O ( 1 0 an 1 O O 1 O 1 O O Lo O (() O ) _O L()N 1 1 (880AVN u) uogena13 I 1 I I „ OO � Lb CO 000 0 0e- N M 0000000000 1'1 NN NNNNNNNN 411 0 in 0 A 0 - rte *Pi 0 O O N N N i.,- 4° .- cxO) Ili o m '0 ;( LO NM O v7 U I U �, v O 0 7I o M It,' O 0 O ._ co U co I N m N O U a ! 0 a� N C cu A 1) 5 l/ o 0o in it J 0 It 0 i 1' 0 0 1 0 in I 0 0 l0 O i0 0 i0 0i0 N I ,— I (88aAVN 14) uoi1eA9t i 1 0 1 1 i co o CO OO ,- NM 0 0 0 0 0 1� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i N N N N N N N N N N0 't; co cob co V C CO ts �. — COO O O N N N 12 O ! A / to 0 N co / to M 1 N O O W U to Q U o 40 0 1 t� o M .....,, `\� o t co Z'O) V) 3 N co CO N w �. �� N 2 O Ua o c y O /), LoO O ! // o to I O in I O _O 1 0 co I O O co co co co co 0 LON I I (88aAVN 14) uo!lene13 0 I I I I O0 LC) C41.- CO Q) O a- N C) O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N I() CO 0 NI- (pm:. — o N 'N O r O N ;B M N> O (///1 M 4io . TDC M I, co 7 I CO o UE 111 N O � 1-0 U- /, L // v a i7 a) o c �/ N lV to o 6 O 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 _o O O O aCI 1 I (89aAvN 11) uol1ena13 0 i r I o0 U) Dr� COC) o - Nr) v 1 00000 0 0 0 0 0 00000 N N N N N N N N N N 0,r) I CD j 4 l I 0 .4t 01 17-C 6D 1. — COO O O N N CO �� 'a .ctS-S C IC) O M :// N- 1' :co oQU o od /f - O ' M \I 0 .. CO C co Al f6 Ucc 0 CO a) •' N O L O u_ •oa U O I� 0 2 N C (6 N O 6 /7;///d/ e 014 8 .:".iti 0 Lo i 0 1' O O O 0 O ,— _O IC) O .C) O ION (884AVN 4) uo!enal3 0 I I I I I I , l'-- 0 0 00 f- 0000 NMR �. O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N I• O b CCD i1 1 {l� 8 Yr N.O M O O N i 4.-Cl it 0 'al ni In 9 N II N M c U / Q / o U Lo o — o 111( ,o M� co TD It U, E 130 00. CVO U N N // O 575 tt) ..1„,,,,..,:„,4,'- O O Irl ell o in 40) 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 to o LI) O LI) _O LO(V I 1 (88 JAVN 11) uoi;eneI2 0 I I 1 0 (o000O ,- NM V . 5,' 0 O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N ( o - UC) (0 I I O V 'NC( O O 0 0 N N N O 'I O U) . U) /' 'a coLo NM N j O to U Q U / •Lo q- v o 0 a 0 I, M _ N o C o •- M M f�C) C M I 0 Uw 0 CO �) 1� N o va P I c. N C N ; 5 0 `I I o 1v O 1 0 U7 1 0 _O 1 O U) I O O Lo U) O IC) O 1 ()N O L I � � I (884AVN 14) uoReA813 0 I I I I I ( o8 00Q) o NM V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 N N N N N N N N N N �' O O i r ‘tO — r 0 O 0 O N N O.u- - U) O 4 iii M 1 10 1= � I O M r to o /' o v / o / v I o 1� M N o . M d Z.,1- N CJ 0 LI O = o o a m U "iii a c N as O ES Lo/ O �5 O J)/rif; o 0 I 0 0 0 in O 0 O Lo O O an N 1 (88aAVN 14) uo! Aola C) I I I I i 1 OD LO CO h OD CO O Y- N CO C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) N N N N N N N N N N O VO O O ✓ I - O O CD 0 CV N O.w j( ) 0 N4,0 ! ' ' ' '- LS LS N M NM cL—N = I11 0 O 1n U U I c) nr//// o 0 ct 1/II o CO 4I 00 C M Z'to (n j 1 ' O6 O LL Ua /( o c3i iiiN C�0N 0 O LO J/�fel .v � O T'//` Ii O • Z e O 0 1' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 I) 0 LO N I 1 (88GAVN 14) uoilenee 0 I I I I I I O Lo (o h CO 0) O T- N CO ,49 00000 i`: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N !r" U) ////p/. Co 0i / O cosr uro, 0 0 N N N O /. m 1. 1 O N c0 . i U) M a O co , Lo 0iii o i .4- i l /, 0 0 d- iIIo c) M N O c O • CO 75 Z"0co H co f6 m I. { N C 0 / / N 0 / Lo O ....,/, O /AI 9 .ini 0 • 1 I 0 0 U) 0 0 to O L O U) O Loc.] uol1eAe (BHant/N 14) 13 Noo. tom I I I I I j o0 to co f-- co O o ,- N M T / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / N N N N N N N (N N (N O it : IN. . .— O O O N 11 N N O If CC co , O NM o u) U /' O fto M tl' O _C li coZ'1. I V) j M co U� � 0 m N O l u_°a U ' o 0 N C co15 0 tor // 0 ji o Ato 1�� 0 1 O \• 1 O O 1 O to 1 O O to Oto O _O N 1 1 (88aAVN 14) uoRenee O Oco O co O _O '- N_ _M � ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,�� N N N N N N N N N N �I, O 1 — co I/ 0 1� M N 4CI) 0 Jr (3) O s ,c) . h5 N � M N; O I i I •1. 0N- LO 0 14) CO n CO 0) OA- N CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N 0 - i!) CO 1 O o . . .- COO O O N CV 0.v- - N O W O O A 40 N O U) Cn / -0 O M N� 0 O Lil co 0 Q U o in .1- o 0 0 0 M O Ia) O .a) M TD Z"O (i) j 1 (0 O d 0 0] U A �� N O W I 2 •7.):- U- a ' , U N c m V)t .///;i1// / � / O /, hili O Lo TV ,40% O \ O 1' 1 O O_ 1 O 11)I O O Lo O 1() O t[) _O t[)N (88aAVN 14) uolleAo13 o • 1 1 1 I 1 A on Lo (O p•-• co m0 — NM7 n 00000 V'' NNNNNNNNNN ( i�� O 0 .7 44)1::. i'I - (1)r 0 �, O ON iv, N N0.O l W ,- yyy4/ O 9 E N O M 00 U � U / in /IV � v o 0 0 Ln M _ O a) tiY O C 7 co 7D- ▪V f6UCO � lu, E N N'o � N 2 O u_ 0a / o m Nm 0 676 o o tii/ ,... I ft, . go o \ to o A 1 O 0 i 0 In i 0 0 I (88aAVN u) uoi;enee 0 I I I // O CO CO 1� CO CA O — N CO a O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 N N N N N N N N N N r 0 CO If O � r (O N O..- 1, Ce 04 0 � ( i5 N O lik U, r ; , o .4- o 0 0 a O M _ O N O .- M 75 Hil/ N C 6 1 to o 4 4 _ ( , o r( 1 0 f TA O 0 Lo 1 O O 0 U, O 0 OCC) O 1) O Loc.! I 1 (88aAVN 14) uoI;eAeo 1 1 I I I 0 On LC)0 0 0 0 CT)0 0 N CO V / ' 00000 `' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N O _ , i . - i O 0 N N O. - - 0) O I� - ct co O c- 4L) N CO 1; r O O Lc) U 'it ; di O C O CO U ti/ om` N N E N 0 O`� LLU a ' dN C/1 N O ��f O O iji 4A ,\ 0 O O 0 0 O � O t() O IL) 0 LO I I I I (88anvN 14) uogeAei] O I I .L. I I CD V) CO OD O O .- N M f. O O O O O - O O O O O O O O O O I N N N N N N N N N N p I' CO ; C) V C SCO O N Q.O '{ N O r .— CO j O O U U //// +/ 0 v 'H; 1! p cC . M 75 = II I m U� p N it� co O '-'72 1 0 a '. LL U hi' N 03 5 4' dfi l CD / o il41( C3 CID 01 r ,,. 0 U, I 0 0 O UD I O O ID O 1) O Li) O Lo CV I 1 (88anvN 14) uo!WAGRR 0 1 I I 1 I + 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 NCD M V1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N 1 0 - LU CO . O V r CSO - O .- O 0 0 N N N O Nas .a co N co. ex N O O ii LoU a CJ ilfi Lo v o o vr Itt o Lo M a> O .- /1 MTD co 3m U I N E N J.12 O LL Ua a> ill N C 03 14 0 3 In y , 0 cp /4„,,,/ Oi eg 0 O to 0 O 0 LU 0 1-- _o LU O L O Lo 0 �N 1 I (884AVN 14) uogenaR 0 I I I I I 0 LI) CO I- CO 0) O ,- N CO V O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N 0 LI) co 0 CO 0 O N N O.4- I N O � ,� 1, _ E N N M / N j O O in1 fr)' : I 0 to M O N co TD 111k co 7 V f6 1 CO U� O E m a)4) N O 0 //P in/r 0 o Lo o 011 do / // o , Lo ;I 0 C. L. I O 0 0 LU • I 0 0 � O LI) O u () N ) O t I I (88GAVN 1l) uogene epi.eannrwYlAlYfi11MIIIMKM. ,.,p ,. .. _.,,,,;. O I f I ( O� (C) CO f� 00 0) 0_ A- N_ M 00000 _ PO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N LO _ 1CO - II V o art - o CO 0 O N N CI N O GG) E 0I I O M N j O O co inU a U i � v O 0 / 7 /I O (i? to M O N O .- coTD Z'0 cn U cc ' o ctsm cii 0) N 2O O u_ UaN "I N C 03/0' ou.) 5 0 0 t/ o I� to qr 0 O Li) 1 O \ O_ ) I O 1 O O O )(7 O O 10 N I I (88aAVN I) uoi;et e 0 I 1 I I I N o LU CO n CO O) 0 ' N M V , 00000 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /A N N N N N N N N N N Iftst O � O 0• 0 N N aa- - N O - cc co o N c6 tin Jo cr)N M N > ///it w QU in I o 0 li ve)L° o N co 7 1 t m Uc, . E m O = 0 LL U a /r�� o ca.) ifi N co CTA0in 0 0 o o igioid 0 in 1 o 1 in0 ,-- _o LU LUN O to O to O 1 I (88GAVN 11) uoi1ei e 0 1 I 1 I I 0 co r-- 00 O N M V O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 'lV N N (N N N N N N N N Iif O <g 4 143 V t - coo O O N �� .- .4,) � _ ai co N Y M 11 N j_ O 1.O co Q I U ifo 0 0 i V / 0 M O c .- coc00 �� co 0) 1 CO U0 Q ' 0 E N I N U d /'I L) N �1 o c N �p 0 b O Lo/0) O ty I O to 0 0 to11 80 0 ,- _o in O to O to O LO(V I 1 (88aAVN 14) uoi;eAeI2 O 0 t, N. Lt, CO 0 CO OD O N- N M .!�. 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 I N N N N N N N N N N !t' o �� _ 0 ,i. .-0 0 N Q..- N O 45 co a in CD M N j O O inU 0 tlif i' o in �� o o /it M I O C O .MO N 7 1 CO m 43 lI N 0 LL a` f to J/ No = o / O ! ' 00 O O in1 O 0 0 in in O in O � _) O 0 In N I I (88GAVN 11) uoRena13 0 I I I I I i 0 toCO 0 CO O) O ,- N M iF 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N O - i 1 in CO '1, O "OL' CSO \). . . _ COO O O N N 0...- _ N O 0 td LO M diO +• 1 0 N>— �I O U (7/ o o 0 0 ri; 11to `� o ._ 75 0 ij! N ,-- ,.',/1 N O N�O ' i O LL Ua N o c N ay ti, � � o ,7 O r�i o Lof:,d4 O O co 1 I O O I O ini O 0 10 0 to 0 LI) 0 t4N I I (88aAVN 14)uownej 1 1 1 1 1 O on LOCO0 0 0 0 O T- N Cl � 0 O O O O O r OO00000Ooo N N N N N N N N N N O - O CO 'I O V -e CO O CO O O N N O.4- a) O cc N I O -h- IC) hi2, 4) N M 0; O a)>- fl O (1) ��r O Q 1�, U i O `4- CD 0 O v o Mill Z.O N CO 7 Lo (0H O m N O '4 I N C A� o (130 /7„4,;(l too } O 1 0 O O 0 in 0 O O O O O N � 1 1 (88aAvN ID UORBAel O I I I o8 LO CO n 00 0) O '- N M V' O OOCDO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CV N N N NCV N N N I O - - O CO 1 O - O iiN 0 N (O ) 0 `- CtM rJ 0 -1.-. 1.0,' . . .- N C6 'r .0 co NM a= O CD LID ODC) C U CD 41 v O O v l O M l/ O C O •.- COTD p I 0 E LL '/� i�• 1 5 v- O O 1� ice LO I )11# 1, LO I iO .i ,_0 In O O It) O 0!) O IC) _O In N I I (88aAVN 14) uolleA813 0 I I I I o toUD 0I� 000Y- NM V 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 ,/k, N N N N N N (N N N N / 0 - E4 0 00o O tD NO.� I. N O V • 0 hi Al1.0 to E M / N 0 I, - O in Q U / Lc> v ;/// o 0 // v o to M _ Z O N O C co Z'M to 7 to Co Uw 0 CO NQNi 2Ou_ °aU o v o c N 0p y ti 0 0 Lo /.4/ 0 o , / 7 aLoi. 110 fpLOI I0 \ o 0 to o t() O to O toN I 1 (884AVN 14) uoi1enaI3 i i 0 I I I I 1 I; oo CD coM os- NC M 0 0 - 00 000 _ ,t� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F N N N N N N N N N N ' - U7 CD ' O Vo - O co N a L.- - - a 0 _ W U') /ti0 E• M ani > ( o U t to st 0 fit o v O 1 I/ z. M I O a) O C M a) CU ) CO NUa) E � li o` LL aU P)) o N ccyo y /fit / O O 1 fl in Oa/ O 0 Ls) 1 O _O 1 O U) 1 O O o U7 O U) o t_ ()N UOI I 1 1 (SHan`dN 4) �ena13 0 1 1 I I 1 O0 CO CO N- C1O 0) O N- N M 7 O O 000 yJI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `' N N N N N N N N N N 111-- (OCD I 4:10 v 0 _ 0 0 O O N N CI N O `- CC CO i0 i129N @ /A NM a� /o m co U U 41 o 0 0 v ' O Lo M O N O ._ C CO715 c Lo CO U iv N E U �� Nik CF., CD 1.5 (/�� 0 A4 Lo 1s I/" o riff in 4/ O Lo1 O O 1 0 1 0 0 � O CO O Ln O 'A,N I � 1 1 (88cAVN 14) uolleAe 3 1 1 I I I 0 o N- tf N- co00os- NM 'V' !. O 0O O O0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N ! o I U') 1 CO O '-c, 4 1 CO N CL.- - N o 45 03 II to ao+ M N > // O O toco U U to d I 0 0 i o 10'` M li�t9/ v o c O C M � 7c Lo I' m I U N E o U 0LL a O U f/ N ca y_ ot 0 406 Of/ o l� Lo <• jil 0 0 o 0 i 0 i 0 0 Lo o to O to O N 1 1 (88aAvN 14) uogeAe i I I oO r- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N • 1 0 U, O 1V o O it ON N O"- CC M O 6U) E c NM N O O ,x,,.. U U ii o Itl0 , o M v O 2 O • Z'1,.. ill M N co c Lo 11 CO N N O a a` i U �/ Nc Ny /Po o tA, ��'' o lip /P I 0 L 1 0 O 0 U, 0 0 U) O In O U) O �N 1 ,-- I (88GAVN 14) uoileAoe 0 I I I i I '' o r- ((0 Co I- co 0 0 Y- N M .1- CD 0 0 0 0 0 - 0000000000 .' ', N N N N N N N N N N 0 (o I.7 o R CO CO O 0 0 0 N N NO.O I �,. (fl N � co NM O co di o,i_Lo 0 0 a Ili !1 u9 oM 111 lId H d N C �6 y O O OO,/ r,g0,01(1/1/11 // o ll iS 10, 0 Lo 1 11c 0 0 1 0 0 I) O (() O u)o (17 N 1 1 (88aAvN 14)uogenaI� 0 I 1 I 0 LO co 0 0 N co V t co O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N 0 - l0 O 0 ✓ r CO' CO O 0 O N N ) O • Ct O 0 Lo Zi5 03 to (i I i i O M O . 0 O ( In 0 i to ( v 0 I v o In co 1 � O o .- coTD GM N O• I (6 CO CLIS N 0 O O Ud LL o O o c N alyO LoO O O Illijillillif O O ../ O M 1 O O_ 1 0 U) O 0 U) 0 U) 0 �) _0 to CN 1 I (88anvN 14) uoi;eA913 0 I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M V I� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N (4! O O I _ O r- CD /f0 Lr O O Q N CV )O c '1 O In fj) M I,i°e Lo U0 /////: o �� v �/ o O 2 O .- M N Lo i N71 m N= / 1 N O` o 7 u_ v a /; a) AN 03 C N I (/ 8 (I in NYO O 1 O (1 _O 1 I oul 1 I 00 O LC) O i) O N I 1 (88GAVN 14) uoFIenelg NI 0 I I I I I 0 0 CO 0 0 0) •0 N M V r; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r N N N N N N N N N N 11 0 - - to I CO O .- 'NC CSO II . . CO 0 0 N N N O I I CC N O CU I O 9 N NM N? O O (n U) U U j o -4- 8 0 0 io M O C M C O �` C6 3 co 1co a> 'n a� T0` N O oa U t o c N co Cn 0 6 , /1 o s bio II 1 o f in 144 i 0 to 1 't, 1 0 1 0 LI-) 1 0 0 10 O co O 1$) O co N I 1 � I (88anvN u) uogenei 0 I I I 1 I 'I O I,- LO Lf) CO CO 0) 0 - N M ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N O - In 0 � � i. _ o O• O N r 0 CO N o.U)O CC co iii, O N �0 to"' 0) E M N? O O CO Q / U 0 to � D o0 i, M ►i o co (n c 0 I) CO 0] 01Ili 0 a) 0.o N O Ua N o c 0i / N (p It O / Lo8 I' O l Ln k0 r s illiftr O \ 1 �1 O _O I O Ln 1 O 0 Lo O in O in O CO 1 I (88aAVN 14) uoRene 0 I I 1 ' O 10 O OD CO O — NCM -a- CD O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1i N N N N N N N N N N SII 0 11 to I O O O N N 0.w O O Zii co to E 0, O M r in o 0 iii it 09 M ( ' O/, C O(0 I, O CO M 15 COCCTS ) 0 N o � ,� N O O u_ Ua 16/ a) )% N 0 ea I ) , if00 O O le .1 in 1410, 0 O to 1 O O_ 1 O U) 1 O O U) O U) O 1) O U1)N 1 I (88anvN 14) uoi1eAeI 0 I I 1 I I Oo LOco I-- OO Q) 0 e- NM V O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N j O - CO V, r c0 — O II O N O.r- I N O CC 0 40 LO to Zr) 1 E tom., f,' o a)4j— o Q to U o Lo (/ , o 0 0 `� M ti1i, � O C 0 . m co 11, co0wOm�, tot a) N O 7,—0_2 U 10,, 0 � N C (E N 5 O to O tO Lo OP/A° if a 0 �7 0 1 II o T 1.1_ 0 to i 0 0 Lo O to O Lo O to N I I (88anvN 14) uolleneI3 4 No 0 I 1 1 I I i o • VD r- CO 1T O Y- N CO V 0 0 0 0 0 O 000000000 I. N N N N N N N N N N 0 1f4 fD 0 O nr gra m O O N N N O Ce co-0 (J.) /1" .— O ;15 CO � M / O c U Uo inv r 0 o vtO 0 M O c O .- 15 3 O \` 'CO N it ca a E N w N O = o U / No C f6 75 i E O 1F O (ui' O M O A i 0 Lo1 0 _O 1 0 L. 1 0 0 O O LI) O N uollene ' 1 1 (HHan`dN 14) I� O I 1 1 1 I r-. It) (O h CO m o .-- NM Cr Ii 00000 0000000000 _ NNNNNNNNNN �� O O O N• Q..- •- IX N. if 45 C6 co a� I' N M 1 co:::coU Q 0 / co szr `/ 0 fil r o ft , 0 M '14 O C O ._ M z,L0 co O H O U N j CD co O E L. LL U o v NC (0 N / 6O s- ,"( , to (1' O 0� k IS •i o 1 k o 1 O O 0 In 0 co O co O 1 O_ tr)(�1 1 1 (88aAvN u) uoReAee I 1 1 ' O0 LO (O I� CO Q) O N- N M V ' O O O O 0 0000000000 N N N N N N N N N N O co 1 I 7 . . - 8 V -c O O o N N O.N O Q- co / O "- 40 to N to N N M D.= O a) - co U to / o v- 0 o !I kiO M O p O C co ct m U� Lo o 33 Cr)w N p ._ o U a I (n toO 07 40 e e / O to 40 O 01, 8 1 O O ,t 1 O to 1 O O to O to to O to N 1 1 (88GAVN 14) uogeA913 O I I I 0 L) (O N- O O) O c- NM O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N / O tD I O O O O N N Oi N O to43 2 / 7 '4, .1::) 0 r M N>- O u Q /i t) f U 11. O u-) V O o1o i M 1 ,,, .....N O C ate.c cof co U ce O m N O LL va /I/ No a, C/// O Lo1I. , I O O upO _O 1 O 1 O 0 � C)O ' O t() O to N I i � 1 (884AVN 14) uogeAee 0 I I I / o (O CO I,- CO Q) 0 L- N CO V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N � O . _ L O 0 C CD O CO 0 0 N N Q 4- N O / / U)) N CO / t1) �i �� • OON- to co U Q U o v 0 0 a o to M _ N c O a) "i cc m U N E = o oa `/ U / No 63(11 C 11/r to 0 O If i in O il0 ,.e1 0 O 0 ID 0 0 U O l() 0 U) O LO N I 1 (884AVN 4) uogene , , , I / § 0200 ° � ^ r - (//@ & @ & R & \ \ RR- - § - 77Cy j / 00 — CC ,— 0 6c 2 m /� iii r 0 0 \ \ \ / \ /« 1 % \\ � � \ 0� o > {/ \ co 7 d =2 a ; _ t ,_ \ S ., .x wr _ / , } k S , S , » »© o ? o r cv§ T T (8 OAVN 14) uo9m13 I I 1 I I / 0 0 0 0 000t0) O ,- NM V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N O - tf) co /I/� OO N N0 O Co N (0 / //: 0 tt) IIa NM N 1 O incoinV 'Il p 1� O O M IP ".-.. a) O - O ._ M N 70 ,y f6 Uw co. m N ��/ N LL O °a U A a m w o o i 0 '41 o to i' 0 1 fr0 I Lo 0 0 1 0 ul 1 0 0 Co O Co O u) O CoN I 1 (88GAVN i) uoileAet3 I I I I I O 0 U) (0 N. O O) O — N M ..4- C) O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N 0 _ — O CO I / 00 ' V r O /, O O 0 N N ) 0 M � O � / 0 N f6 N co I CI= Io II} O O U Q U 0 0 v 0 liM "://i/1 O N O C M N i, N O O O u_Ua o co o o C N 0 to p O O 4(0 O .1r O 1 In 1 O O _ k I 0 _O I O O Lo O U) O Ij) o anN I 1 (880AVN 14) uoiTeAeI O 1 I 1 / 0 O 0 CO f� 00 0 N M O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N0 O Lo/ co i /1 O V r ttO O O N N O N N :d U) iJa inH � M ti N>_ O O (0 U) Qi1,11 0 o Lo o d- o Lo M O N O C M Tu ce co U ) ifli OE m 0,- N O o.o LL aU i/ N c l0 Lo o Lo O 0 O O 0 U) 0 0 T 0 U) 0 N 1.--_O in N I I (88anvN 14) uogena13 O ; I I I O0 0 CO f� CO (1) O r N M /' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N O co I ; /I. OV r 0 / O O O N N CL N O to N f4� in (/ co Nco CI= O to > to U Q U o in v 0 O a to Y a co O O C M T'M N N O o L- 0 a O (k' o c N cp o o ,01,) 0 6�, i� o oirojet too 1 1 0 in I 0 O 0 to 0 0 to O to O to O Lc)N I I I (88aAVN 14) uoi;eneo 0 i 1 i 1 I '1 or tf 0 0000 N Md 0 ,- ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N (N N O - (D O CO N O.N O' I CY (fl O N co i 0) M N j O O Loc U Q U i 0 v 0 0 ds )11 0MO ...., NO .0Mcn m CO Ua2i u0i E N wil N 2 � Oa Ll. U o c / N () itiN Oin Oo JO ., O ii 0 Lo 1 0 0 Lo0 Lo 0 L() 0 to O LO N I I (88aAvN 14) uo!leneI 0 1 1 1O to00tTO NM v O O / 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (N N N N N N N N N N - / to co O ✓ to C(0 O O 0 0 N t, N 0) O (0 0) as EM a= O U ul U o it Lov iI o 0 O to M _ O N O — M Z'to fn Om U�Lo E N N O a� - �1 =o �zi it Uo UN C /1/ 03 c) o e o /i 0 LoTN k. O Lo O O 0 Lo0 0 Oto O to o in N ' 1 I (88aAVN 14) uOl3eAeI3 0 l i i I0 14) (o f- 00 6) O CV CO a 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N I O . co- 1 I O V t c O O 0 0 N N la w N O CC OO N �6 '' to aN M Q_ � 0 � ' O 0 Uo v o o o �nMO �O .�MZ•COfA ca 3'jill CO U1 o 176 N O LL ill? N `y 0 P o — y' o -1 o Li Lo k \ o 0 0 to 0 0 � O Ln O I[) O ION ' (88aAVN 1 ) uogene 3 1 I I I I O O8 to a f� 00 m 0 N— N M O O O O O • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �, N N N N N N N N N N p — • r/, _ - _— In (D .f O V r 77 ,` O _ (0 O 0 0 N N N�O O) 1 ir) co mIt Ln �t V Lo U ,' o 0 0 v )1,1 M $ O � O M Ii 1': Lo E N O N 03 iii ' O i p 0 ,I If 41O NIA I \ . O 0O to O Loos (88anvN 31) uogene I I 1 0 1 1 1 I rrf/ff''' 0 10 CO f� OD O O N M V fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N : 14O J co O to N N O '. . O O N f4 .0 co i N M N > I. O O Lo coU U o v l'ill 0 0 lk Tr Al O co M ?+'co N 7 r CO / N U /�' o E N / N O (7)at U �• ri o 0 N (D I b 1, O O r‘lr ' O r O N 1 O O I O in 1 O O U) O I() O 1 O N ) _O L 1 1 (884AVN 14) uoiwAeR • ON-I I I ON- CC") CO 1- 00 CD O ,- N M V O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N I. 0 _ l0 CO li r t�0 't . . . - COO 0 0 N I (V 0)0 _ 177 CO0) '-. I M N O O O c U a u p (s0 ..10 0 Tr 0 M )iiiii/ O CU o .- M 71-) D m CO (IA N 2 u. o o 0 o c qN coQ U, ild'' oO/ ' 4' �,. C 0 1 0 1 O O I 0 O 10 O 0 O Cn O LoN (884AVN 1l) uo!leA013 0 i i i I I LOCO0 0 0 0 co 0 N M V O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N /P O O 0 V 'NC 40 J O M N 0 0 (N -0 I�i in 0 N 0 � li 0 LoM N>O 41 :0UQU ii 1 : o o a co10,4, 4109 Z-•O / fn 700 0 / N N O 0 CO N - LO E � N O =o a u_ o U I N C m iA ;4If a Lo �j� a ' i�' . o 0 0 0 0 Lo 0 ,- o Lo 0 U) 0 U) O LoN uol1ena ' (SHdndN 1-1) 13 O I I I 0 47 CO1- a0MO � NM V O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N O i.// O O - t 0 //i f/ 0 O O N N N O.O Cr COO 40 I 2N 9 NM fk :3 io v 0 0 o �i M O co 75 co j 00 co fill/ 0 ct 0 aN m _w ill' o lL NN aU cf.,/ if O0 )11 to O 0 to 1 00 0 1 0 to 1 O O in O to o to _O to I I (88aAVN 14) uoigen913 0 I I I /A o 10 CIDI1,- 00 O O ,- N CO O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N / O 53 I O ./ O co N O.w- N O ;iL O O U )1 i U0 .n v (0 0 0 a 0 m M cD o C co 75 H 02. m U ij$i CV 03 o c 9 too po .15 i% 0 0 O Of LSi 7 0 0 I o Lo 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 0 � O LC) o 1) _O LO N 1 1 (880AVN 14) uo!leA912 I I I I I 0 ' oI's U) 0I� OD O) O - NM V' 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /' N N N N N N N N N N . .- L O I /`! I f O M 0 0 N N Q.w i N O IX i O O / IF (� LS LES i• i o o f/ o M O N O CO iilII °a U a) o ii/ N 00 ill) oa� �, o 1 rif o in .,. o O 0 in 0 0 in O U) O in O_ U)N ' (88aAVN 1}) uogene 0 I 1 I I I Oo U) CO N- CO 0) 0l- N CO a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N NO O a* ,C (O '' // 'O.4-N- ONNm> o 0 inu U I f o ,,,.O a oM o � M H 0NO/ L 111 u_I o v , N 03 / r 0, gA/ 0 S ;4, O 0 Lo 1 0 0 0 U) 0 0 Lo U) O U) O 1 _O UN 1 1 (884AVN 14) uo!TeABG O I I I I CO M M CO r a) CD CD c- NpE O O O O O O O O O O O N N _ up — NNNN NNNCV V I O r O o td N O.N O i / NM N O U if ul I 0 17' V N OSIO0 co a o 1 O CD Co a)ct M O =o 7a` 1o o co } 0 coma P co N '' a ( O t U-, N ' O O /`� N O to O j, O O to O O Lo 1 O O U) 0 co O V) O to i 1 1 (88aAvN Ti) uoi;ena13 0 I I I I ,, I o °° co co f cor- cocoor- N00 1� ' 4,t O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 N N ,I O - NN NN NN NCV 4 j. r o N 0 C ' - CU O co loo co wM ' N j O co ii/ O fD U to Lo 1 Lo ,1, (:/a4:°)' � oo Io 1! vr Lo I o a) NO o o� L O N CL I 0 CO �.'1 0 (6 `I 0) Iii o in N O O N / , i4i O to e O 0 N -...fr O / 10 r o o Lo I 0 0 ino � o in o in,- I i i l (88GAVN 14) uogeA813 O I I I i I CO MM (D r-- co O) O r' N OOOOOO N NNNNNN0N i 0�- N V � 0 V to / O ti O O (v N 0.N 0 O to if) co co M a co = II, O co U U , 1 0 co coji/ O 0 co/7" O co Of o a> oEt o m .1) i.i •M O 2 o Q L 7a. U (0 O i co co f tco jN O O N I I to O O O to O O to 1 O O to O to O O coto I 1 (88anvN 4)uo!WeAe13 O 1 1 1 r �o w M co CO I-- 00 cr) '- ,- 0000000 °1 (N - O 0000e- N N - NNNN NNNCV V 4 In Ai O O O c1 n c., N• N O Et O i) O to 4 JO E N N> / co O u Q ff U / co t r Lo co iii Lo (0N i fn V I 0_ 1 N I tr9 63) M0 O t fQ a) O d O 0 o C ( co (6 in0 0 N 0 0 I 0101 r 0 0 0 to 0 O Ll) 1 0 0 cl) O LI) 0 Uf) O co (88aAVN u) uoiTeAoI8 i 1 0 1 I I I /' o9 co M ` CO f� OO) O_ � NOO 1 O O O O O O O O O O O N N 1 O - N N N N N N N N4 n / O Vt O O O cv O iti 0 r O . t!) NM o �� cOD fn / 0 co co o O ?:441/ o Tr v o m c ifil v o (6 co 2w M Q£ 2 a) co0 a, i M N 6 I O I Lo N f O O N O t-. O O I O 0 O co 1 O O Oco O co o co i 1 1 (88aAvN 11) uoReA813 0 1 I I I I. 0 co co 1, (O N- 00 O) O ,-- N p OE 0 0 0 O N N - N N N N N N N N ��/ 0 n 0 Ow 0 CC N + toO NM `� //it) CD MH OF O(D '.A /01 0 � Lo , � -o / o m.rt �/ .4- L Toa a g� O m c �w M o -c o /i Q o co V 8 coc _y 5 O Lo N • O O N 0 0 O LoO O Lo 1 O O (o Ou) O Lo O to,- I ,- 1 (88GAVN 11) uoReA9 0 i I I If co M M 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N N - N N (N N (N N N N V f/. O " o 0 O O N N N O M O to NM / N> O O co co Q U to in i0,1 o Lc) j / to N 4 o my a o /�p 0 4n co 0 ,/ co Q U oo a, CO17 4) o N O s O N J C o to Ir O O O o O o o to 0 ix) o to _O �� 1 (88aAVN 14) uolleneI3 O I I W co co O N. GOO _O N_ 0 �O ti O O O OC\I O O O 0 0 O O e N O — NCV N N N N N N u) / O ✓ r C• SO n 0 Ota CC V1 O to N (6 (d O M r co Q U o to / too 4too /y" o to i v // o N 8i � c @ N M O 2 o Q L d I/% U fn o N N 6 O N i • O O N • to O O tto O O 1 O O up O to O to O to i 1 I (88aAVN 14) uol;enela I I I I I OcO CO CO UDI,- CO O) O A- N E, p O O O O O 0 O O O O O N N � O - N N N N N N N N 4 n i O ,Ti- o ', O O Ot (N N cc Lo� �/ a NM O a. F. e co coU Uo in o 0 0 fr , Ili v ID /411 ). . . . . . . - o a) my aowo co ' MQ za ed o ci (On It M N kf 17) 0 1 Lo N O 0 N O LL) c' O r O O LoO O to 1 O O Lo O t(7 O Lo O 1 1 (884AVN 11) uogeAet2 0 I I I 1 o i' CO M_ _M (D N.- CO O O A- N O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O - N N N N N N N N4 f1 I i 11� O V r CSD . . ._ O O O N N CL N O • W (D O M$ ii O N (D aff) M CD O> n o CO 4 CD U o /� Loo o 0 Lo ' v o cu cro 00 `r __v a 8� o c M o z o Q oa o c 6 o 173 'I ' L N O Ct3 a) N f/ II O O O O Ul 'ii IC O O LC) I O O CC) O IC) O I() O 0.t- C.. t7 � r I i� (884AVN 14) uoigene O I I I i 1 8 CO CO O O CO O O - N O O i O 0 O O O O O N N ► O - N N N N N N N N V i- - lot O -p ' . . . .- O O O(J (V O. U) O ‘- "."- i a to N it O O M O O co '0//iii I `o U �, Q CJ in I di; ,. 0 0 to 0 to V 'O 8 d m v O N�O 0 ni.O oF O I. Le M ..0 08 798 f . id, to ,i N 0 Lo 'I 0 O 0 O 0 to I O 0 to O t() O I)O u7; (88aAVN 14) uoi;eneo O 1 1 I I I ( o M_ M_ CO r•-• CO 0) O1- NOO 0000wN N - N N N N N N N N 4 - n V Nt LO 4(6 ` O IF _ O oU i„J u9 I( u9 Aft o o Tr -oc ' o °) v m o p d O p) Q m 44 Ne /11-" to / N N Ii o Or0 0 1 IN v. 0 O s O 0 O (C) 0 O to A.I (88anvN i) uoi1ene13 O I 1 I I I co° co M ,— CO W O) O N O O 0 0 0 0 0 N N 1 — N N ON N N N N V ' — CDn IS 4w 7 0 ii t` O O tv N cs a)O ,_ccs ii( o lf') co 0) y M N= O 8 co it o o 1 ' U) ' U) 1t lo ii 112 it;i oa lel o a' m ( wo -u-) I\ n1 d O N 4 _ 0 Cn 11) C o co i � , Q wa i a) O i 0 U (n / _ - 01N 7.11 Ni� tf) e N ` O ' N i o U) O O to 0 4.1 0 1 O O U) 0 U) O co _O Lr),-_ 1 1 (88GAVN i) uolle^913 0 I I I co co M 'I i co N.. co CO CP s- N_ p p 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O - NNNNNNNCV 4 !` - to I h. O VCSO- O / O O tv 1 N U) O Al O co T h4,4 S43 C° ‘- ii co M Uo Lo)I l co coi f 11 1 i O Cr o I CL L 8ID i o � m- c) _O Q 7 d ' U O N M .. o N N 1' : O O Lo Of/ o o 0 0 U) O Lo O to O LO; (884AVN 4) uollenel� 0 o CO CO (D1- M O) O ,- N O O I. 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 - N N N N N N N N 4 I' ii O O 0 N Q C- .. a) 0 (X _ l 0 .4 IC) ti= il o o (1) > co 1 (.) I Q U O In i�l I 0 0 i1 In ,f 0 v '0 � 00 a) m o/ .q.w In a 80oco) c o I i' ro M o Q -ca a) in — I o 1. _� M 1 0 Ui 10inN i O N O O ji a i � O •4 1 . 0 r 0 0 L0 O IC) O In O In i (88anvN 14) uogenei3 0 I 1 I I ` I I M CO COh CO O) O '- N O O O O O O N N 1 NNNNNNN- NdU, L r O - 'NC (� 0 42/ N. O O(\ i N )O \ -C=V IIC) Ny `- (O SIN ;, N j O O N co o Q 1 I U in I o o o I , CrLo ii‘l (1)o �m o aoYOrn mM O � 4Q L aa) M N U o fn O 0 1pN O O 0 , 0 N 411. in ' o O g)? ,- 1/ / / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- O _) 1 0 O Lc) I 0 0 in O Lo O to _O 1.0i 1 1 (88CIAVN 14) uol;en913 O I I I I I co co co (D (-- CO O) Ox- N O O t O O O O N N CD — N N N N N N N N 7 - ,,1 to I I ,` O O O• O w N O.w - a) O ▪ CC M i 0 a -(>1to M N> o O CD CO U i Q U i o to •,II, / i 00/0 to0 u) v 11 v o N cI v O CD ` )c� 1 a o o Cr) to C co 0 o Q s(1 a) oo o c M e i\./ to to 1 N O 0 N 0 u7 1 O 0 1 O to 0 0 to I 0 _O to O to N O T (290AVN 14) uoi;ene13 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 124 of 260 APPENDIX B YEARLY PROFILE BEACH WIDTH COMPARISON TO DESIGN STANDARD 37 S N .- -tc00 O O N N aw - U) 0 (Ni N N.-- la O M , in U Q U O .--I c .rc 1 f0 c '1 c N c cn L I c U a4 O �O N O n m C GAJ � ^ I-I ) (4 Z M ea ^ E. Cj O 1.p^E ,p ci e-I .". O .... O N = O 2 O L 3 L f- uf° d c co co In N N C N v O I N ei O N p C O rl 3 1 NO N ( dA N (1) Q N . 0 tf) ID T N c H c I cc u u v_ v 3 O O i.0 2 F- F- 2 r O cr mc-I rN-I r� O -I � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L an a ieaA � - c c n ua Q in � cn cn CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 126 of 260 R-22 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 109.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 109.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 141.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 141.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -10.2 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 130.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 130.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 108.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 108.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 16.2 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 124.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 124.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 113.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 113.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 107.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 107.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 9.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 116.5 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 116.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.7 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 109.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 109.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 15.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 125.0 ft a 0 0 N - 'o CO O O N N 0_V- - N O N N t6 '- ..o Uj Nco 8d� Ln o a) -. cn Q ftt 00.0 j in in N N tD 11'1 ea L�1 N ri LA N z 0 ir ko E. E. E. oN 0 CO .4. ••• �' NI Q1 ...i. N' CO CO in Ln coo 44 is r1 O - - N _ D CA ael v `'' ... N C al O ll ri TY m 0 m ± 1m0 �_ 00 N C w 1.0 •+ 3 L " fa.) CO ti U a) c m co Ln {n n c M vi0 I 1 r4 '4 t.0 0 — 8 0 ul N CO f N N_ NC co 3 N N3 g o pp ... aJ 3 T. ,N N 1 Q t0 ' T D LL tCS o{I RI r Ln <a £ E �. _ . o o a) N C N N E a) aJ C U v CO U to U CC L Q a a L. = G 2 I I- H LL. I ,rM N 0 -I .-1 -I I-I-I � 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N -CS 77 ao T. '-; lea T v *' CL A a c c a LA_ ° a v) a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 128 of 260 R-23 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 101.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 101.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 122.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 122.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 5.8 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 128.6 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 128.6 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 115.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 115.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.5 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 118.3 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 118.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 113.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 113.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 8.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 121.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 121.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 115.6 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 115.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -6.1 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 109.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 109.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 7.5 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 116.9 ft e 4 0 0 N N 0..- - N 0 `- EY0) N E N M I inN c a OC o to - , c UN M M M M ^ O cr c N e-I c1 N t0 tp la QJ ri ri wl ri z .,..i. p in N M r♦ c1 N $ .z 00 ^_ _ cn M N a ni ri ri rM-1 $ �. a, Z el ru X11 Op ca o lA o o 00 M m ± ri N M z o 2 - w Ori MI a: 3 L " U CO v CO C CO n to c on OJ 0 I N O D ..C.:0".. 00 tV *— in N T QJ O � N N▪ GJ 3 u +S G LL r-1 fa _ U-- r-1 G N f0 ,E. E C Ile N N N E N c ; c l _u v v re) v Q. 1 'O. a 6. 2 F= F`- ii 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N L on > a aeaA Q c a, *' U- a Q- ( Ln c -,-, n n a dimmirm CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 130 of 260 R-24 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 115.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 115.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 132.2 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 132.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.0 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 138.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 138.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 118.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 118.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -2.5 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 115.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 115.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 135.2 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 135.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.3 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 123.9 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 123.9 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 124.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 124.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -25.5 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 99.4 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 99.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 14.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 113.7 ft 0 — — O N r 0 O O N (n ��o N c co N N CC �_ - .0(,) NM CO .-I Q ttc fts $ $ $ g tr .0 I.l1 C1 1-1M et dai pp Q1 -. ami O rr;4 as l O' N O aa Z o r..... $ � N M LN IA m M E. ai vi N 4 Nsr ..... 4.. al 4r/ , 00r1 00 4.1 I4 Q1 t N O eY1 r' > M N IA aN-I d Z Ws e-i c ri V • m V.: Tu toMONO oOLMo=g t+ .... Ill 'a iti 3 M f0 al CU C Y C 00 in ai 0 I t0 G a-IO N N O 0 it) N CO N co rii -I N j O 0 N DO N >. r d 3 C ! 4.. u O. . Q u c v dO 00 .... Q LL tD f0 rfi. f0 E E ++ — N H CU C CU C 1 CVC u u 1 u w u i CL E. o. a 3 0 2 = = r -_f 0 O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N -CS 77 0A a aeaA a c CUc a CL - tli n - �U- Q Q V ^ ,n CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 132 of 260 R-25 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 94.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 94.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 135.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 135.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 135.7 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 135.7 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 112.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 112.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 111.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 111.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 124.2 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 124.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -12.1 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 112.1 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 112.1 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 113.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 113.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -19.9 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 93.1 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 93.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 14.5 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 107.6 ft v 8 N V r 0 O t.0 O N I W CV 0- i N -d' M 1 OC E O M N � N 1 h Q 1 U ra $ $ ++ $ $ $ `�' $ $ t r-I up w. n 01 in M 00 tG ++ N M - i rM-1 e�-1 C N O m Z 0 v) $ $ $ M Lz'1,4 0.300 ll N 0 a Z • M .-► H M $ f0 O ri 00m ^ O O N - L 3 -0 _- L u f° N• c CD 4�, H 00 N 41 0 I 0. oo iN 0 N '"""' N 00in O N 00 >. N v r-Ia.+iCt O. a) 3 U .I N CU >- 01 CO .--. O LL n to SII 01 E in N + to+ E E C — C 1 " `0 0 3 in E al U t=o co c0 (J u ep U U U - a a W. 1,- a .L ii 231 F= H ii i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N oA > a 18aA a fl c c o Ll CU L Q -, Cl) -, Cl) -, --, V) (0 2 CAC September 11,2014 VH-3 Staff Reports 134 of 260 R-26 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 108.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 108.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 147.4 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 147.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 0.5 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 147.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 147.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 123.4 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 123.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.5 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 123.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 123.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 134.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 134.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -13.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 121.1 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 121.1 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 122.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 122.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -16.6 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 106.1 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 106.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 33.1 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 139.3 ft 8 N QNC . , O O N NO..- N E0 N M N a lac g U r N N $ en $ eT O M M V Q1 en 01 e-1 00 ;, M C r-1 00 O , i--1 NI z L l O -- Co E. M O N r-I N ^ v N $' IA LAd \ .............. .4. .4 _ m• '^ o m ± m o O N = C 4.. 13 cs ...1 to L) p d co v1 cc00 to 00 N m N c Imo N a) 0 I .A 1 Mr rl N O I O Q �� — N L in O N 00 >. t0 ^ eN-1 0 W >. N .... CiD >•i N V 111 4.0• a) c N 00 >• • CI °1IO M O5 00 f0 LL 11.-1 V _ ri. £._.... E E +, N `o 0 a 3 Ii H E 41 c era vv v a a a LL = i I — f O ,morm- �I r-I r-1 OO co i O O O O O O O O O O O O O ab a aeaA a Q v a, L.L. a Q vii cn vii a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 136 of 260 R-27 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 82.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 82.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 123.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 123.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 116.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 116.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 97.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 97.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 96.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 96.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 97.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 97.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -8.4 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 89.0 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 89.0 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 90.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 90.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -0.2 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 90.7 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 90.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 34.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 125.0 ft 1 0 -- 0 N , C O Ngo CON anc M .22 N1 _ t11 N cn ei Ur.,.. 00 tD M et ri M nj ri eelal rel C in ++ M r-1 4•1 C 1 ei ri Z 0 ir ri WI 1.4 M ri $ N M ci OF N o0 co cn $ N .c . ^ �rl r1I. 14�.� t0^0 i-I al 144. as o .-1v OI'° cdmMNO tZmm±= ‘.0 : 3 .12 r n u (1300 y c co m a.., C C1 0 I ^ NC r-I G o a N N p c0 N IV C C N 0 3 O N 3 00 >. N u rn a Q sy .e in aJ >, L , O rn 0 LL 4 fC op u __ rel._ C N m E E }' v '! 0 o a, 3 V N N N CU C 0) C M v v u to u F. •L .0. 'c. d L 'u. = I. F- ii 12 .�-1 .On N-1 0<-1 O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O •_. tin T a aeaA - a c c a 'i a Q vii '� to � It) a .r. CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 138 of 260 R-28 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 97.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 97.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 137.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 137.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -14.3 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 123.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 123.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 112.0 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 112.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -4.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 107.6 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 107.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 111.9 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 111.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.9 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 111.0 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 111.0 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 99.4 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 99.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -11.8 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 87.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 87.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 32.7 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 120.3 ft 8 N i V 0 8 O 0 N Cil Cs! 0. N X rn 1 MCe N co 22 E� N M Ln 0 -1 a tit .c al e I N N m N N tf3 td U CI LA 1%. 1.4 qi:%-.1N M N N ( ( I ei N Tr z $ O inM IA $ or N ft)o N co F 1� ei m 4\00.00004,000000:04H01. ei o v Tio m r CO 0 t 0 §I 0 O N = O E 2 .. Ot .-. n v .0 tT 1\ m v w to co in in OA N N 0 V' N O O 0 La — -- N j Ln o N N C C RI gl C N ! p 3 O 3 O N ..,� 1lb T N 4-0 c VI u V" C E E f = E o ° ! E , a, it to ro v a 1- ir 1 = O O O OO O O O O 0 O Csl (NI (NJ rsi-Q rE d0 >' a Jea,>a 2 - c c Q Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 140 of 260 R-29 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 87.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 87.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 143.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 143.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -23.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 119.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 119.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 105.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 105.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.7 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 108.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 108.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 106.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 106.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.2 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 105.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 105.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.2 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 98.3 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 98.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.1 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 93.2 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 93.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 29.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 123.1 ft 0 I N .- "CC 0 0-.N- 0 M a Ce .0th' NM a L!1 c e-i U CCC $ , , I w I N rl Q1 N e-1 N M N O • to N O 4a e��l L• 07 L11 i�-I ri N M Z $ O O ' Ln IV 1 rl $ 4 00 O 01 M LA 401 v N $' N .•. in E. -'411 o0 _27 � .-. N 00 01 LA M N Q a-1 CO Z � . O ..m., W c m — N (n d 01 ca m ± O m r-I O v 0 N = 2 ,.._ t •0 3 r Is y C CO• 4, Ln N N. C cc t . 0) 0 I er ^. a ri N O O --(9- p �, N vn C .-. O)N C >, 3 rl N 1 t0 Lf1 O , O A N 00 N V a.i a v +; 15 M C. .a Q M NJa Qf1 0 .... i I.(5 to �--1 _.__ V __.. —� N +0 E E c aa, 0o o CIJ 3 E +., 40 N N co u u u i (5 u d '.� •L. O. •0. a •L L. Lt I I-- FL- ii 2 4 _._ -r ----- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N (N N N N N N N N N ona J6aA d c c a a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 142 of 260 R-30 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 109.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 109.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 141.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 141.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -10,2 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 130.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 130.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 108.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 108.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 16.2 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 124.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 124.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 113.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 113.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 107.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 107.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 9.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 116.5 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 116.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -6.7 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 109.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 109.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 15.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 125.0 ft t S N V •g 4 N •O N M N a)O M N . N O M Oa)� N. n U 0 QJ Q Q( ru S ll C 01 tD n a0 lit Lb U ap to ^ tC aG M N dN al i 1 ' '1 i N Z 0 1 N ai rn $ N O et cn N CO al M ami i r-1 ... > .�. al $ M .r - Z v c O m 0 mvi o 00 0 O O N i O w t 3 L ra al a m co Irl Ln ao N a) 0 N tG O0 I inN N N DD i, _ C N C C fa in RI ai 3 N 2 p v O N Oil N Li Q 4.1 ijLn m V am n O p fa N v C1 E Ln N 1 a _" o L. £3 N V1 RI u u_ v_ t0 v E L Q C. E Ti it = 1-- H it 2 —— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N do JeaAa a c c Q CI) a Q N ^ Ln -, -moi N a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 144 of 260 R-31 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 108.9 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 108.9 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 131.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width(6/06)= 131.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -10.5 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 121.0 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 121.0 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 117.2 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 117.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 18.7 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 135.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 135.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 131.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 131.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.9 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 124.4 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 124.4 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 117.4 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 117.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -15.4 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 102.0 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 102.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 28.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 130.2 ft 0 N 41- C 0 O O N N C1,- - 0 a N `- -0 u) E M d co t al CD N N CO CO O 00 •*V'' CO "-I N to M m eN-I M CU 1 1 Z 0 Lrn E. , . N M 1 2. ei c in co N. aMi r..el �. $ Z r-1 ... ... C M ... ,y M V V ea O ca t O O N = - 0 t E. 3 N uf° a; asaJ c co co vn N c au N cu 0 I O N O 0 ..__�. N to N N _ 0c CC 1 a7 C O 3 .�.. N O N A CB v O N Q Lj O a, CO LI) V 1-1 _ ri E......_ N }1, i m £ +- E ca cu - H Fre CL L Q. a a a L ii =F = ii 1= j L.L. 2 I _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N si L > a aeaA T a c a as LL Q Q V1 V1 -, N Q der. CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 146 of 260 Vanderbilt 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 101.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 101.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 132.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 132.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -4.0 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 128.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 128.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 112.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 112.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 3.1 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 115.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 115.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 119.2 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 119.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 113.4 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 113.4 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -2.7 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 110.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 110.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -21.6 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 89.2 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 89.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 32.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 122.1 ft 0 o N .-• C CO NN N N O •', Ce a• a 0) E N M ..__._ _. e-1 U C , $ ,M $ g g $ e c M oo C1 ✓ I t-1to r.j 00 Lff 00 n u1 i-i Cr , rl ri ei N Z $ 0 ri ai j cCA q N w - 1'4 en rl Q1 N 00 D ri e-I Z tC c 4- •- m 0 to f' N m ± M O N = VC w L 4.43 r co u f° ea -0 d C CO CO C N 0 I N CD CO�_ O I � N 0. NC N lC C R _ LA N 19 0 , N N N M a .a Q in O M v VI CU N L.) " -- a' E N E o £ 3 RI = N N N C E. to ii u u ' mu Q. c 'f a " Z = F.- F= C u_ z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N _ oleo a a c c a LL Q cu Q -, V1 -' Q VI -=i N CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 148 of 260 R-32 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 110.2 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 110.2 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 139.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 139.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -15.8 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 123.3 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 123.3 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 108.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 108.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 18.6 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 127.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 127.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 126.1 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 126.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 4.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 130.7 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 130.7 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 119.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 119.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -5.1 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 114.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 114.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.5 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 122.2 ft 0 0 -1- ` ° M § \m en wƒf CC i] � \\ in m - < ° m g g g g g « © rim00 fli 4-1 z $ _ 22 . � . K 3 E. 2 . Z E ~ ' m 2 2 ƒ , m o N } _ , . 2f $ Eft .02 2 / § k = 471 CI at % cc ƒ r c 2 3 | V q 0 o 0 B I r I >. k gi ■ 45 NI v is al 4-41 CU -0°. >. . . . u o§§ 2 CD � %§ c ■ c M U U U ( § E . . E . o 2 , 5 67 I I , u I . . . ».. . . — H-- - o . :. . . . . . .. � . Tr 1-1 q N q 0 00 N. 0 0 0 0 0 N0 0 0 0 0 0 % - 7E ® k Je A ± k @ / k ƒ & / � 7 - u < < » v) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 150 of 260 R-33 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 95.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 95.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 106.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width(6/06)= 106.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -10.7 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 95.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 95.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 99.2 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 99.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 8.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 108.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 108.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 111.4 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 111.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.2 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 112.6 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 112.6 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.7 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 104.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 104.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -10.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 94.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 94.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 8.6 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 103.2 ft 8 » 22 ) (/ . ; _ a0 en kin M k`- C Ce \\ . . . h m . .� % \ a) 14-4.. stg g m .0 N eN C # q N 4-1 d Q i k e r Z . . . \ co / _ 0 00 E. ir F > 0, § t f NE. 2 % $ iti al 2 o 2 ƒ � § 0 } ui 2 g co .... « at -0 e - sV k 2 ea 2 W co k . :. Lr) > & k ; | iN t.0 Cr _ o -0 0 N 00 N ■ o § 2 ~ U N uc. < Tr tA _ � — - -§In kci) u to ■ k U U U , ■ e s . . E . ° 2 I = z I1- a _ o \ \ o o N. lo o \j / \ (V NJ NI N NI NI NJ NI / 77 k >- k a�A k @ @ k £ J % } -, $ 2 2 $ CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 152 of 260 R-34 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 82.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 82.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 103.9 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 103.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 106.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 106.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 86.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 86.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 92.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 92.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 109.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 109.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -9.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 100.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 100.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 1.7 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 101.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 101.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -13.1 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 88.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 88.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 10.7 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 99.5 ft 0 _ . 0 N F c6 0WI cvCD0 M 1 -(75 n n co -1 a at U t6 � ` ` ` 4- .0 O e.1 0 e-1 N a 0 ^ M CV ate) N Ill r M M eLA M-)II L N z 0 1 00 vn co ( =�y Z �i a N m _ N M 014, O o+ m M e4 in v m O c c F 0 N = a--1 O �1 1 0 i `- T CO ` 'C C c7 3 it al cu 03 -ci cit Co Co i I - 00 ... o I ri 0 C --,----14-- v0) N N >, Ca0 ) 0 CO t!1 z . N ei 3 N 0 N 3 bO N ✓ +; 0) = N i.; M Q. Q u o a) _a >+ N 0 LL 4. (5 - ._ __JJ____ .- -___.�.._ . ._._. L N E E +' aa) 'C RI o o v N N (5 u v u eo u F. ',7 'Q. Q, a ti 3 0 2 = o ii I 1- I- u = — -- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N Ni N N N N si 77 oila aeaj 2- a Q Li_ Q '-' N -, V) -, Q _, Cl) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 154 of 260 R-35 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 81.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 81.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 103.2 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 103.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -5.7 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 97.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 97.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 78.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 78.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 15.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 93.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 93.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 97.1 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 97.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -3.2 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 93.9 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 93.9 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 87.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 87.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -5.1 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 81.9 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 81.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 22.0 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 103.9 ft 0 _ — 0 N V r N0 GO 0. - N 0 M CY a 03CC E N M ct. in 0 a)> a-1 Qac o , C V to al r O M O M r-i tviM z 00 co N '--I > st Z a) w C m m a ci + 00 caM LA E. 0 O N = V O C 0 art N Ct a+ 00 73 .-I 01 t Co Cr; al ril V -O 00 44' RICO Sisr, O0c% Q1 t0n c OD v I V' O 0 N 00 in NN c 0 M tI1 f0N 2 O v N v 00 N u •0 41 Q u CO a O 01 ar -CI ›, 0. v D U. O tli c0 M U — E N GU '—^ O O aJ u f0 f0 f0 I u m v u u ! eo u Ti. i '. .O. I d 'L = o 2 , = = ii = F— F- I ii Z — 1 -- o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _CS rE 0° T Q- l8 a a) c a i LA- nQ Q vi vi , CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 156 of 260 R-36 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 84.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 84.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 95.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 95.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -3.7 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 91.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 91.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 78.6 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 78.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 3.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 82.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 82.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 91.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 91.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.9 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 89.8 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 89.8 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 90.4 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 90.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -12.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 77.9 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 77.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 17.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 95.8 ft 0 0 N V to o A N 0.••••• t � Ce � M 0 CC � � N M N N _.. N. (n Q DC o c +� ir $ ig g g it g U D1 M 11 ^ Up CO 0 00 1!1 Q ^ M VS 1� 'p a01 Z 0 L1 1 co in 00 N 0 ,--I > Q Z 0i 1 c E. * in I co m o tpi N Q1 Id1 00 CO (-I0 PI C11 4a 0 lt 15 $ a, 3 0o t0J $ of ori ,�u, o Cl iat CM v m to `! 00 N d 0 I N kO 0 O in N 00 N _ N = O t0 M o N O N ... 00 N W = A4.; Q. :Et Q w v 0) op in 47 CO Q: !0 F.,._.. _.. I --V.--- -- m EinN RI• L £ c in o o 0 c H - d c RI u u A u E 2 i- H it Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N U- Q Q -, V) -' N -, -1 N Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 158 of 260 R-37 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 102.4 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 102.4 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 91.9 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 91.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.7 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 98.6 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 98.6 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 91.6 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 91.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 98.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 98.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 94.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 94.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 83.1 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 83.1 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 12.1 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 95.2 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 95.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= • Annual Erosion/Accretion= -10.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 84.9 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 84.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 8.0 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 92.9 ft c›o _ S 0 m^ 0 0wC s- 0 N O U a0) a, E ,, . . 0 a> — - in 00 0 01 Q1 a ^ G1 ^ V M r 0, z 0 " 00 in 00 —__----- N 0 ,- > v a }� c z t71 g N. OV. M ! c o N 01 %-I r-1 O N co ± O Qj o f O O C 3 .-i ch ... I-1 I-1 C v4,—., 0 N = O L ••• CO .0 to GNV1 s m u1 C too 001 0.. m m C oo N N 0 I Q N CZ CZ --N- — 0 y 0 co r0 N O ,O I- •a.V a+ CU = QO1Ca u Q oa0 CD E es 0. a ii = H H CC 2 r-- 1 — _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N •L OD >' a JeaA 2` a (11 C N sJ U- tZ Q Q cn N -= N CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 160 of 260 Pelican Bay 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 92.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 92.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 106.7 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 106.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -4.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 102.3 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 102.3 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 90.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 90.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 9.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 100.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 100.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 105.2 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 105.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -3.4 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 101.7 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 101.7 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 99.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 99.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -9.4 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 90.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 90.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 12.5 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 102.9 ft -- 8 N Cl)V• co0 co N N O M _ �1/ E▪ co N M n en ei U O) Q UCO % 1 N 00 N O IA O47 N � ri Nf 4.1 e4 Rd: N O N N Z 0 ol in 01 y P z. O - $ III' viio0'a _ vm0 I .. O Q O o0 N Z r 0 E m o m .: o 1:11z � J 3 = In 1 O0 °' 1 • INN r , r-- In I trio n 1 i o N▪ � O '; f�0 Ill N .,• 40C N *' CU Q u v VUp 0 S 00 p LL 1 a: eo u u v_v _ ,i €11u I i-- Is. - I LZ I 1 O � 0� O co O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O N N N N N N N N N N .Q — >- yiea > w v a A a c c a u_ a z O1 7 - Q Q In !n -i -, v1 CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 162 of 260 R-38 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 110.9 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 110.9 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 87.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 87.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 28.0 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 115.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07) = 115.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 104.0 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08) = 104.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 0.0 ft End Beach Width (7/09)= 104.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 104.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 101.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 101.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(7/11)= 76.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 76.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 32.2 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 108.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 108.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (3/13)= 92.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 92.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 8.9 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 101.4 ft 1 0 0 N - 0 al N N CI O M 1 a) CO CC d cn NM C/) ---I Q 01 U C 4.0 g g g4- g $ V .�-1 N M m . O CO Lt to iG COVS d ,i- M M I-1 M O ri G1 kO Z 0 U) in ._- ----- .� N }I: a 1 .4 ei II M $ 0 00C rl m 0 it g O Z er ..... o n, o s M • a m 2 m ' Co r 00 CO.. Co g `° `n :133id: = ....1 3t 2 Leroi it a m ---vr N Ci n, 1 M e-1 N N t0 ...L p co Nin N CO 0 CO re N C O co C O Q1 N OIC G N Co N to Cn - o co a+ N p` 0 '^ o I o a, 3 N VI O C H N o c O a + u u u CO v • toM 3 00 fx 2 = = U cL _ �— 1 F ii 2 1-1 , .m-1 c-1-1 c-I0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c a JeaA a c c n _ a ? a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 164 of 260 R-39 2005 (Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 101.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 101.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width (6/06)= 94.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06) = 94.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 9.8 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 104.3 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07) = 104.3 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (9/08)= 88.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 88.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -8.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 79.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09) = 79.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 110.9 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 110.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(7/11)= 94.4 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 94.4 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 12.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 107.3 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 107.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (3/13)= 96.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 96.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 10.1 ft End Beach Width (2/14) = 106.9 ft 1 - - 8 N rO a O N w V Oi N C tY0 to '<r) a, r CC 0) M N] NN Cr) .-1 Q tot ✓ C $ g $ = O N O (-IO 0 N U 0 O N Q1 N e-1 N M rl M a4 Ti' M t 11 M M Z 0 ,n ir ui a--1 I ri tC t0 I c COco 00 0 rn o a o Z O N a O E C4-r) w O O^1 ^ M M $ ; J `t' O IV 3 2 N 00 - N u g i .�' N `� m 1D N N 00 L N N { in— .--1 .-. ?1 -1 O --3.. N -- II 0 r in to 8 0 to r4 C Cli. 3 c O — N v b0 N M 4J = >. 4-+ ti N Q. .G Q tLJ tj 0a N N 00 GJ p 0) CZ °I.C1. f0 tn v c�'1 ___a • rS E LL m N N O C H N G1 C O d + CO u u _CO u fa r 3 0 o a U CC = 1- H a Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xi — oA a Jeal �. ..: v v 4.;L Q A U- Q. Q — H - N Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 166 of 260 R-40 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 73.4 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 73.4 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 77.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 77.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 3.2 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 80.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 80.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 75.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 75.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -3.0 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 72.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 72.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 106.6 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 106.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 11.0 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 117.6 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 117.6 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -35.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 82.6 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 82.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 28.2 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 110.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 110.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -3.8 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 106.9 ft 0 — — — — -- --- 0 N '4' 'C CC COO J N 0 0 le — a) co ut EN N CD . N in a)> H N a I N U i 1%. GC � 111 v el• 0 V1 ,--1 ko ir O 1n M r1 N.. M i,. 4 ,- 0 O C el ri47) fn co m co0 ri 0 > co 0 N Z I" $V _.__._._.. _� _— O E m yl ell ai O m M w o cn s173 ± 3 t U ns G7 14 W eco $ e `.' = e $ e w CT t tt N e-I Mct O n .!t 01 N r-. 1.4 O� -I ( N L11 M V M ' ( C to — — �N N— N 1 N 1N u N 0) c:o0 O 00 0 f eta Nin up — 3 N �1 O CC. N `i= = _ tyi >. a-; QL vii u10. .0 ON °? io n v ›. __�:+ G 0LL • ea 1 cu in1 ho o w cc fa L L L i C ' o (Y. f E VI 0 CCIS N N U Gut C roc v u u d 0 ' CO u is + L G. Q Oj E .L 1 V oG 2 FL— H U N j ii 2 0 `t 0 ( —, 1 � 00 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L on > a JeaA - a c c a 41 U- - Q - V) -, V1 -, -, Q V) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 168 of 260 R-41 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 111.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 111.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 110.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 110.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 1.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 111.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 111.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 137.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 137.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 35.0 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 172.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 172.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 99.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 99.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 31.3 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 130.6 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 130.6 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -51.1 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 79.5 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 79.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 78.7 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 158.2 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 158.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -1.4 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 156.7 ft e 0 0 N V 0 0 CV N N 0 V CC rn 1 N CO `- CC 0 N M V.0...=_ In U) ,-I 0c + $ L O u1 m e-I N it) et N tD Lfi 4.1 N r-. M M ami r�-1 e^-�1 tC Z o In N ,--I C Gi c Tu ,: m o O o < a\ 01 O 0 z y N us y^� ^i O 4. 03 LA '( f0 •p $' e-1 N 0 3= 0 NZ 0 etc tOJ o } m 0 i 0o 0o g 01 aI 1-1 .-Gr O N —0,---C an w 00 to + v 3 e4 N 0 'I' 'CI' Ili 01 0 N 3 - OQ ›. N a p 0d 4-D N I � o O 4) 1NJ e co E ql f0 6.L c6. N M y GJ ej 0 Kr E in OO N N 'r v+ 1y v ce c fc utu v v •. � v C.3 rc a .x H � F LE & S 0 ,,-I ,m-I ,N-I ,moi O co O N O O O O O O O O 0 O O O _ci 77 oa a maA a c c a L.L. a a cn cn cn Q w�rr CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 170 of 260 R-42 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= N/A ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= N/A ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 97.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 97.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -17.8 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 79.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 79.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 62.9 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 62.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 18.6 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 81.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 81.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 86.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 86.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -35.1 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 51.6 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 51.6 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 36.4 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 88.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 88.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -41.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 46.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 46.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 26.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 73.4 ft 0 0 N C NI- C C0 N N O I} N'' w/ -0 Q) NM N _, a._.._ N n eH co 4- g w % $ it s N e7 m O1 a1 N. an U M OS N ,..j tIS ‘15 1"4 n N • 4-1 M N I • • eI N ei Z o I in in N (-I . a) C H 00 01 00 00 0 O < O Z O N .-I C M O MO%,- .4+� = + y. J ^ N 3 = a+ CON. t. V .-. m I n co V.411151°1 N LA LAI VI tC .cr • Er in CO • O e..1 O N 111 O OA v N C ca 0<i +, N .0 >. o r"- 0 N 0) O .N.. is e-I N 10 e-1 00 .00-1 __ v N.__ N v; ..__... _._.i E N +, -: + E E +r 111 i • C i N M rem I L N tyj CU a 74 o o 3 N U t"o d utu u u ro +a CO E N v a. Nii F. L L 'a 'a L fa 3 O 2 = I 7 m coI O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N a 7_ on >- n aeaA T a c c a a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 172 of 260 R-43 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 64.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 64.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 51.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 51.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 27.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 79.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 79.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 66.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 66.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 73.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 73.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 56.5 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 56.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.3 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 55.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 55.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 61.2 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 61.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -22.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 38.9 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 38.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 33.8 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 72.7 ft S N '.f 0 0 0 N 0 14. d'co E0) N M (n 0 CU .0 N cn tD t , e-I Cr MN .. ,1 N N O N N M N 1-1 Z 0 an U) N a--I C O) C (I) 00 f0 00 m 0 O < O Z 0 N ... __ _ •-• 0 M w O m co . O i+ J .4.. 3 = L 2 N u • ea ir N ti M .wZ 4\ 1 O 0 �_ N. OI N O pp N Li. In 0.0 .-�r ria E N a� +e„i ro E £ tn IX O N H N to N C C C rc0 a u t y u u u =u0 t� . tF V er H f = 0 0 0 0 0O 0 O O O N N N N N N N N N N -ci u OA >` a .lea, . a C C a LL CO Q cn a cu V) -1 -, cn 2 diummi CAC September 11,2014 VH-3 Staff Reports 174 of 260 R-44 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 73.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 73.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 85.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 85.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -21.9 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 63.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 63.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 67.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 67.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -2.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 64.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 64.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 62.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 62.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 62.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 62.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -27.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 34.6 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 34.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 24.9 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 59.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 59.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 16.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 75.7 ft 8 ;=::' rs0 ,,AA N 0....— l a) 0Cr ::7) F CC N N1 N e^-1 Q ox U 00 '1 d1 . O 00 N O 01 N N e N M M IA Z 0 00 U) co > $ a ai z c w m yM ^ . O m OJ o 0 00 N = T .....„„,00 s co t_ ^ ^ a c n_ 11i1 : on N in N 00 C O O N N v , ai ai 0 t ++ r. N O din >~ o N” 0 tai ui �° LnI--,___ tv E E 4+ N C !" 0 o £ a� H N E cu u (5 cu c t0 f° Uv V w u u u Q a .L E o o = 5 3 LL Z I- F- I LT. Z 0 T o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N �. ✓ �, a+ aJ aJ a+ L on 0. lea, a c c n LL C]. Q In -, In -, -=. Ln Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 176 of 260 R-45 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 75.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 75.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 66.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 66.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -5.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 61.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 61.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 64.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 64.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 3.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 68.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 68.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 62.9 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 62.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 10.9 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 73.8 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 73.8 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -44.1 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 29.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 29.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 47.8 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 77.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 77.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 21.4 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 98.9 ft A 0 I 0 N CCD .A O O N W N N O le 'cr) co r CC NM c. I to a ac U L 01 O tD $co ci O r1N: etc ` a tD to �, M M el i..1 n N d GJ Z o _ 1n co u) co ' — > 6V z ai C_ 4- M (n m ^ to $ co o 00 m d10 N Z ... EA ^ o izr 00 c 0,6CO t m '0 oo cao co r coco -o co c m co c to ao $ a) 0 v 4.3. at I it Onin ,...1 _ ^ N t0 N ItO MG 1-1 G 4 co N C70. IN N C O p >. p 0 N O M N •3 00 j ..... N at 4.i 0) 7 0 ++ N . Q to Ou .-1 I CD >. � 0 r1 .. .0 Li. N fa — .._.. E N _� t./ E E 0)cla '^ o o a IV N rsh 0l c a) c u I to RI RI 0 ra (0 u u u j RI u � o. a a T:= = a 0 0 i s o 11 i 1- H AL LL I -- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N t U oh >' a eaA T a C C d LL Q -, n -,( (A -, � 2 (n C CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 178 of 260 R-46 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 88.4 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 88.4 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(6/06)= 83.9 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 83.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -20.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 63.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 63.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 70.9 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 70.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 13.1 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 84.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 84.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 67.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 67.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 10.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 77.6 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 77.6 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 4.2 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 81.8 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 81.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -20.8 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 61.0 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 61.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 36.8 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 97.8 ft O —_ — — 0 N v- 'c CO 0 aw _ N O ' CC co tr OO YC E M L(1 L N it e-I Lei Q1 t cn 0 V O M n -1 O 00 C ,-1I a-1 i I ) i ri Z __.. ..__._ 0 u1 .--i co . sr Ln co _-- 0 4 c Q Z asM X01 M in 03 0 O O ei ^ O N = fIV •000 t0 p t ati0 V 1c L Ir al c N $ m co re; 0o 0�0 ^ co I N LO Li— O N 0 C• N CO _ c N 2 O O >. N pp N u • I N Q O d t I-1v rl ...... 0 C IL 41 f0 ra E £ +' _ ate, ^ o `o aa, u Ol N N O1 C GJ = COttl u v u to u a L a a a L o o — 3 ii x �= F= x I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - t T a JeaA n. c a U- - O N ^ N iiimmuNiMiniarm CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 180 of 260 R-47 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 103.1 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 103.1 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 114.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 114.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -15.3 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 98.7 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 98.7 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 98.6 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 98.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 4.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 103.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 103.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 88.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 88.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -8.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 79.6 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 79.6 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 17.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 97.2 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 97.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -13.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 83.7 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 83.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 17.0 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 100.6 ft 0 -- '77 0 00 0 0 N Wi CL cc- ✓ CU O V �1/ N m Jo Jo0 N M ___ _ -1 t O CA N IA 0 M 03 e4 M M N N to CU r-I C N N1..1 N I alZ 0 u1 00 IN o . �> ai z d �: c ^ - m O $ N (Cl iti Cr CO CO ci rl ^ E. 1--I m -J ^ �F ..1 ET O N = $ N M O UD03 o l N al aa 03•► COiti 0000 T 1 CO 0or I u co ir ea m I" l 1 V M n 00 I 7:,- N O O .— in eN di O 2 u .N-1 3 N C 0 'Cre-I N ... 3 N N 0. -Q Q N LA u 01 .0 �, co 0 co ..-.. 0 t(0 Cr f0 " o o 0 0.1 CO C N OJ c F.= u v v CO u ii L a a d L p L. 02 2 = 3 z Z H f- LI: 2 t O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N •L tiU >' a aeaA >-. a c c a U- Q Q -, to -, C/) --i C Q wminer CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 182 of 260 R-48 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 81.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 81.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 99.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 99.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.3 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 101.4 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 101.4 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 88.6 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 88.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.3 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 90.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 90.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 88.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 88.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 87.8 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 87.8 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 16.2 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 104.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 104.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -21.9 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 82.1 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 82.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 2.1 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 84.2 ft S N - Ca, , . a)0 V `-CK M I CZN M in CD I ei A U O $ $ ,4 .0 $ $ $ U `1 N r4O n L1 e-i N ‘4g m US 1 N N ' Z 0 in •-i 0 0n 00 N 0 _0 $ - Q z a) 00m O u1 " ci _ ^ $ d m v $ al O00 m Ma D1 � O co N = v OC w at V1 ID 0 u co O m m co in r. c 00 CO a) 0 W O il 0 0 —0- N in N 00 >+ OJ O M 1 I N O I N�A,. oA >. N il d r. N c. Q opo 0 N {4/1 cu >,.—moi. _. u LL an f0 —_ _. _. _�—' N N H O O a O c6 O N N QJ O E RS � U u U u v iic. a a .' = O O = = z° = j u_ x I __. 0 _ci 77 on a .IeaA �- a c c a U-Ill a Q In -, N -, _, (n Q imirimisainiumh CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 184 of 260 R-49 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 100.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 100.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width (6/06)= 97.9 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06) = 97.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(7/07)= 96.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 96.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (9/08)= 90.4 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08) = 90.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 3.0 ft End Beach Width (7/09) = 93.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09) = 93.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 104.4 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 104.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.4 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 105.8 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 105.8 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 2.2 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 108.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 108.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (3/13) = 91.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 91.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 5.2 ft End Beach Width (2/14) = 96.8 ft O O N NI' Cc(D N nw C - Cl.) O in co a m ! O i O M in eg c 4- ir $ $ "' $ t t.00 O N IA LN G1 u1 pn U N Lein N O d N N N ei N r1 N l Z M O N to ...i %i ... , I- N $+ 00 e-1 un a-I03 L epi V p t-I $ Q 4.1 FZ u - m d M n m o .�; M gw O M .... O N = O0 4, • VI ‘.. 00 tCo.. 00 L 'd cc v c co mm d co iii+, N. N 00 C j .� 013.N t0 O N O 10 N C O O A N ..-.. Qi) v N G +' al = Ol u Q m u1 a) .G �" o0 2 00 _ V C LL N � v RI o E —. C £ a, N vl v c u COCCI 10 Li f0 v v v V E •Lo a i 3 L o 3 it = i 1.- !- u = i — 0 8M., 0, 0 0 N- 8 o8 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O N N N N N = 01) >. Q JeaA a 8. Q an c c o L.L. Q n ccn iimmiromminere CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 186 of 260 R-50 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 85.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 85.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 114.7 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 114.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 14.5 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 129.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 129.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 108.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 108.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 15.1 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 123.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 123.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 125.6 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 125.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 17.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 143.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 143.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -21.4 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 121.8 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 121.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -25.0 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 96.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 96.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 22.7 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 119.5 ft S N V o 0 O O N �gl�/� .N Cl) 0 Yl 0-' r �1r N CO a co NM Lrl O> n N __ _ _._. a••1 t N N N e-.1 n O N Mr 00 ++ M �i e^i ri O Cfl r (40J , rl tD Z O C 0 E. O $ N eq r..r 07 \ ^ To co Z ei _r m v fa O IV O m t Q1 ei G g G t!1 O N C o � 1 v E 4/11\ l O I 1 i Y.ww� `- 4+ Ww . 13 $ 01 in 3 v w o0 t ra D1 v CO c :% m co tr) in n c ao a) Ci N• I I icr O in (N1 00 co as N c O 0 N3 NG v v N O u Q N of N OJ I N O RI I N LL "' rat° c C`! 0 0 4J ++ £ 41, 0 E aa CV N N (C u 0 u 03 u E L c. a E. 'L ii x 1 H ii. Z - O N O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 si •i 0A �' a .1eaA >• Q C c a l.L a Q -' In �' V11 - - (n Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 188 of 260 R-51 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 64.2 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05) = 64.2 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(6/06)= 126.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06) = 126.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 14.4 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 111.6 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07) = 111.6 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08) = 101.9 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08) = 101.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (7/09)= 95.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 95.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 96.6 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 96.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 11.1 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 107.7 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 107.7 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(8/12)= 90.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 90.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(3/13) = 89.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 89.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 32.7 ft End Beach Width (2/14) = 122.5 ft 0 _ 0 N V 0 O .g N N �//1� � N N 0 Y ct 0) I a0 cohi Y� .0 i75 N M 'El M n (n .-1 RS N ^ e} CO M N N N ++ to N N N a1 'iLIS N till Z 0 u1 w M LA N oo E. ui o0 —$. CV 0 et Q z c4- • e-1 - Co ✓ G) (0 N d m m + _ Co O N = ori o E g F. on C 4 v. in R A 00t RI N N CO 'a Co CO y+ Lel Lr)C 00 0 41 01 0• G %-N.1 teg N .VI N 1A pp to _ N c O C `i 0 N >. O u N Oq N N INA G. .G Q tD O r.� CJ l0 rl f0 I In 03 U v u RI u E. •L Q a a L 3 CC = i2 = F= F- LL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N - 7. ob a JeaA Cl) - v v +_ Q Q Cl) � -7i Cl) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 190 of 260 R-52 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 58.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 58.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 125.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width(6/06)= 125.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -31.7 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 93.6 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 93.6 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 84.4 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 84.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.5 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 84.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 84.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 56.6 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 56.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 19.4 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 76.0 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 76.0 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.7 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 78.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 78.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -22.7 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 56.0 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 56.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 54.4 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 110.4 ft r I N N at Co O O N N 0.N 0 1.11 O M 0 C11 tM J. u „iitp p L in 0 c Q1 0 r-i 9 N e� N 1/1 CO cr; C415e 1 e qtrZ O ill N 0 C 4M T. M N t) $ m o v ^ O N = $ No 0 , \ at ad N c oo t v E. co C.) c M m uY N " oa Mo 00 v ao v 0 w� W I al p� M W V Aa-I 0 S 3v v N b N IA U GJ u; iv - a 1 CO 0 Le ----.----/A-vG - W as H fp E in U —^ O 0 j d I a£J Caa N ' N C V (5 CO tc 1 ° I COco E L a ; a ! a = o I o = _ a x . i I= . I ---I , 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L en a. aeaA a, a, +� LL a a V) asommi CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 192 of 260 R-53 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 65.6 ft 2006(Post-Constructiont Beginning Width (9/05)= 65.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 115.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 115.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -18.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 97.1 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 97.1 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 88.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 88.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 82.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 82.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 80.4 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 80.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -16.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 63.9 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 63.9 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 20.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 83.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 83.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.6 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 83.3 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 83.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 15.3 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 98.6 ft 0 o N NI- CaCO N a N O to e-ccM Y'/ ki O— CC 0) O LnM N U) ai o Ig U = N ^ . O N 00 a ++ N cn u1 f ,445 i N C d � V z 0 Lne Qt '1 u1 N rlV (;1111 0 � Q CA � C 111\11; 0 ^ F .N M IN ea co en = it p cli v ... O N G1 M o E cri � w n. L 41 ^ MO W L -0 COd c u1 CO co LA 00 own N a) 0 I V C Q Q 0 _o-i N 1-1 O N 0 )o• N N N N in c 3 N pp VNto >` G. Q N 0 et as .c a , N O IA IA 0 LL la t� I v — — C -1 E N Cin ill E c — 4 o 0 E Vf Ntu cu ( u to u u v I ea u I ' a ._ a o 0. — L. LI I F= H ii Z _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N 7 oA >- a JeaA a c c a U- - Q v) -, N - In Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 194 of 260 R-54 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 85.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 85.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 125.9 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 125.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -24.8 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 101.1 ft 2008 Beginning Width(7/07)= 101.1 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 99.2 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 99.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.2 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 93.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 93.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 94.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 94.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 3.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 97.7 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 97.7 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 5.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 103.6 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 103.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -8.7 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 94.9 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 94.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 29.3 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 124.1 ft 0 0 N V Ca r 0 4 Lf1 N N p 0) C N NM O. in CO .-i 0 Oa/ Q UO M M en pp p1 01 L • 01 N V� L O N: N �„� N Z 0 in a--1 E. Ln co ^_._ p N p = Q ao e-1 y Z N V • m 01 ^ U m N $c ^ m O 1A g "� cn N IV U1 m or 01 p N 2 ,i 0 L t 3 i u (0 m N c tG V1 N N 1 coN w v O C N 00 O ^ 1-1 O 3 N ( O N ... Cb N 3 4J Q U W u 0 VI 4) >. Ca u LI. E N =^to O O 3 a) Vf N aJ Ca v v 1 u = 2 2 i '5 Ii— I II — - - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N L m a aeaA a C a) *' U- SZ 7 7 V1 V1 Q Q -, -1 (r) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 196 of 260 R-55 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 94.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 94.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 73.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 73.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 20.0 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 93.0 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 93.0 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 90.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 90.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 98.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 98.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 99.2 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 99.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 5.3 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 104.6 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 104.6 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 10.3 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 114.8 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 114.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -4.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 110.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 110.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -2.8 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 107.8 ft O L N Vt0 0 O O Ni N N0.O (1) � �o`- L E `o Iv O., I w_ N W> t-I o DI U CO O t71 IA LO N cn *, N II O a u1 N LA CO N CU Z 0 to I I to co Q LA 00 C m O M Ti m m1 vi o , \ $ $ to it N oc rn ^ LA O N = cm cn ... cor s v ..... _.,o0,4 § -2L rri -a y c en f0 �.rco in to .- a1 a I vi 0 17i C N N - O >' O 2 >" O v N HQ u N 1 o V a) �a : Q v m Jo M O eo O __I u I -- ___1_-.._ 14 E ++ E ++ . N to CU QJ u C tea u v m u j to u E L a a 'a 1 a 'L it = 1-- ii 1= ii = p Tr M N i-1 0 Q100 1N l0 to O O O O O O0 0 O0 O O N N N N N N N N N N - :77 CO • 0_ �eaA T a Q v v C C Q Q to —, to --i -, to VII-3 Staff Reports 198 of 260 Park Shore 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 82.2 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 82.2 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 103.8 ft 2007 2008 Beginning Width (6/06)= 103.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -8.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 95.2 ft Beginning Width (7/07)= 95.2 ft CAC September 11,2014 immirmimionemb T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 89.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 89.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 92.6 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 92.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 87.6 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 87.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 4.9 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 92.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 92.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.4 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 92.1 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 92.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -7.8 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 84.3 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 84.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 21.3 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 105.6 ft r 0 0 N V '0 N N o .A `_CX ChI rn r/ M N fn - a cc ow g ir $ g Usw N $ N 01 o0 u1 M M Mi tel O i Z 0 -- in N 2. .......\--- in LLI $O t" %I) E. ^ O ndTJ m po 11 O Z rl O0 M O M 4- O L J co co L 2 OU Ch I m V1 n N 1.4 O tn N 00 N C 0 Lfl G N O N ... d0 N Q v C▪L O LL in RI 0 0 4I N H c) v v u j v ` Q Q L L L 0 = I- H = ^T--___. __ ' --r 0 0 0 0 0 OO O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N •L tab >' a JeaA - Qc C Q LL Q N- Q V1 . - In CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 200 of 260 R-56 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 102.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 102.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 90.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 90.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 10.2 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 100.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 100.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 107.6 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 107.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 114.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 114.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 113.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 113.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 15.8 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 128.7 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 128.7 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.5 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 123.2 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 123.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -15.7 ft End Beach Width(3/13) = 107.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 107.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 5.8 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 113.4 ft 0 0 N V O -t 0 o N N N O L . r "O NN N 0 NM c O CV U CC ir= g O $' $ N g t0 a 01 tat N N fel CS ++ MM N tt; 45 O ''1 t-I N 1 Z 0 .r ii tit ri 01 00 m O 1-1 N 00 co co IA M F. N O Z ...i. Q1 ... O O M M O L CO L g u fa d ao Lnn 1 INa .1 — 0 N 00 O N N 00 N 1 w Q v tu f0 E £ = N CO u. C H N d Ca V VU U L Q Q i '5 oo ii II- x — _ _ 0 a 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N oa T a aeaA T a c c fl 7 GU LL Q Q In -, In -, VI Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 202 of 260 R-57 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 112.1 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 112.1 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 122.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 122.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -13.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 108.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 108.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 109.1 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 109.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.2 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 102.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 102.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 109.4 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 109.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 28.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 137.9 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 137.9 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -38.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 99.3 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 99.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 47.0 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 146.3 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 146.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 3.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 150.2 ft O 0 { N ooh <O. /� N Q)O �W 43 co N ��1/ U) CC N M Q) > N co .-1 t M Cr Up m Tr eq eA .. eNi O Ws N as -I ei ii: 44: M N e-1 Z 0 E. .-1 N Oi M ei LA "El) N 0 ,--I > '• Q d Z C .V • m C) m N O f0 + m m —1 O O N = • r O O Z 15 3 .5 1a a m _.....__._ 1)') N I N C oz. Op Q) N ... c, n ItO Cr1O v C 0 .......,1 0 N I C e-I N 0 M � cr N CO. !If O N ID C 2 V1 N e-1 = N O UCO I c• N bb , U N 021 f0 • - 3 Q .-1 0 U 10 L to W O ? N t0 O 1.-. L .. __._.__ ____.._._---._ --VP—_1 LA LL ...r �..a._.: _.....1 E • N VII a) �, o 3 E co c c N a) c 1-4 14 L u V N V fa 111 G. .. : L 0. fl, d ' v = .•I 4.U = =I 0 i 0 ji 17 V) H H I _ ..—. 4 _. ---F 0 0 CO � mv0 O r-1 r-I .• .-i � O co O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 CA CNI CV CV • on T a+ .ICa �` a+ Q) Q) 4-% i Q A Q C C 0_ QJ a U- Q v) v)Q -, -, v) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 204 of 260 R-58A 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 15.1 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 15.1 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 0.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 0.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 24.1 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 24.1 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 24.1 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 20.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 20.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 14.3 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 35.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 35.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 49.6 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 49.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 57.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 57.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -51.4 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 5.8 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 5.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 12.1 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 12.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 127.6 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 139.7 ft 0 -- _ — 0 N ' 'N0 8 M N 0....-W - 0 0 LA CT) )p- N cc ( N inM 43� v "^„ii r.; 0 CA a MQ1 c, Z 0 v, 000^0 .a.__._ — - N0 w ,-.1 z zi c m .-• I am ✓ U N O . .-i m ± rIO J .... O N = F O E 2 t 4- .0 3 r 0 Nm .i...tn — n c ... 00 N v 0 E. .-. v ir �-. .••. 0 '.0 Cr ot O wO O ... N O RI -• _ 0 e4 C I-I v 0 0 u ti N v O tab N et 7 m N r. o. 40 -C Q a U — 0.0 en at cu f0 -.. L �._._ _.. -... - + I _.__-_._._ - LL E 4, .. - N 44 C C ;O' N� E M u CCJ _ GJ N A O U O E in cu C H N m — d C fa 0 V v YO '^ u 5 V a ° 'L o. a a 0. °- O ° o = w o 'a C v°1 I I- ii Z I= 'u. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 En N N N N N N N N N N L aA a JeaA a c c n. U- Q a vni -, vii . En CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 206 of 260 R-58 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 42.4 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 42.4 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 101.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 101.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -29.3 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 72.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 72.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 50.0 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 50.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.0 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 43.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 43.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 42.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 42.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 4.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 46.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 46.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -25.2 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 21.3 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 21.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 28.7 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 50.0 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 50.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 61.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 111.9 ft S N al N C....-- 1 - a O V a� cu .0 in N M NLin _ _i___.. n 0) ti a at U C 113 4. g $' g it 4.. gg .0 i-I I-1 el N to 00 ri N ci +' N rl ”I 4 S 00 O M ^ �-I N z .-. 0 $+ v1 O N V 1-1.r Q1 tr1 N 4., 63 r'154. ani if) 03 ry o 1 . 4 E. z � � m 01 g � •tY M O ra a O O m ± rl 0` v c 3 O N = 11\ *14.- 4... `� T O 4 t \/.."..r4 1� C0 inGO 4.44 o cn 01 _.L co E. m 13 y c fO C°01 +4. b4 te.. M .n a ....... I v tDO it EN O 1 a-1 O N p d 2 1.71 ea N 3 i N O A = N u 0 DB t.1 N tr CO • GJ N N D1 ++ N tL -- Q .0 to t Q N 0 At -0 LLt1 to o) '.0 L LA• ... M )- cu . t0 to e•l 10 I L. p[ _U- G 12 LL I E.._._ N v CI (13 co E 4-4 a u E 3 v U i -,4) fa C U CU m t0 U u to O .c u U to 41 v a -, 4., '� a a s .0. i a c 'o = o = to o _ _ ii O to s 1- ii. z I- ii 2 _ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -CS 77 a4 a IBaA T - c c a U- a Q v� 1 Cl)V - 7 CU V)) Q iimemormomerp CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 208 of 260 R-59 2005 (Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 71.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 71.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(6/06)= 142.0 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 142.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (7/07)= 123.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 123.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (9/08)= 103.1 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08) = 103.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -4.6 ft End Beach Width (7/09)= 98.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 98.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 96.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10) = 96.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 4.2 ft End Beach Width (7/11)= 101.0 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11) = 101.0 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(8/12)= 83.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 83.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 13.1 ft End Beach Width (3/13) = 97.0 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 97.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 20.1 ft End Beach Width (2/14) = 117.1 ft o 0 N •o• =cc) CD LID0 4- W N O 1 OCC N tp N N O M alCL in N. In t--1 U N %-it-i CO4-, Lff m00 W1 M t-1 rl 0 4) Z 0 Ln E. N o 1st ` > 00 Lf1 •t-• �'� I r1 N a, tx; ... pp c m I 0 0 y m v v r.i to O+ CO co �? Oo ..� 2 L16 1. 00 N Nf g 0 1 ) 4 T at 3 t as u ea 13c IL to m �, N C ir bp co 0 41 1\ CI tLIv L.) ri u N en to N IDID o a, N ea IA N d ea Z O fI 2 I O _ to " NN u co0 u O y O. .Q NC3 co N SNM o .; to Q d = N a, u _ VI Ca" 0 6.u _ •13 s- -• 111 d c 0 ti iv ca a, R fa N N u I N I O ,a E ,+ r E c �. .., 0 2 E N fa 6 C u i to N C H VI O a, i O tD a, y' Nco v v1 E f(5 o a de E co tD a o I U R .c US Q +'- _WI 1'2 so R L. O f0 _ s O •+ u ii 0 d lua �' t0o d I 0 ` o 3 = a, O = o tD 3 Z I 1- 11 m I_ 0 CC LL 0 OC 2 I -------r 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O O O N N N N N N N N N N — oo 4-; aea T v c ..: v c a A a c c o_ L.L. Q Q to to - to CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 210 of 260 R-60 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 67.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 67.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 108.2 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 108.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 6.8 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 115.0 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 115.0 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 103.1 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 103.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 11.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 114.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 114.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 111.5 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 111.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -3.0 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 108.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 108.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -8.8 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 99.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 99.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 3.9 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 103.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 103.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 5.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 108.8 ft r __ g N Q C CO CD 0 CNI '11 N O.4 .A .. N O W N co NCe NM 0 CD ..0 il MLA 01 ^ ri esir C1 111 N Z. 0 V1 r-1 E. tC 01 �. 01 N $ IV wl 00 z.-1 co N _ cop v a1 ZZ d 1in C M i 1 yM y ra 1 m o M O O N = ViO O rel •+ v -0 MI o O. m c N r-1 CC Co co C on cu N 0 tD I OC O a+ { o Ci _.-_aLi CO O tD t.7 aan O O V N V 03 N N d , Lb C Co N C R Z O I 1 � 3 ai 3 Z �, N i2 ri T 0 O V ? u ...1 u ti N 01 }i - O 0 Q y N m OZS u n IlL LC t�� _ N ti `p ..007 w v O im N 41 pEj C to d N d H d a) 0- d fu6 Co u co = A = Co O 4- ! C y a • o a a c c a u t i I I-- ii Al ii Al 1= Cl I ii p iI 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 .L ab >' Q JeaA >,- Q c c n LL Q Q - ()-, In 7 N CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 212 of 260 R-61 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 81.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 81.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 125.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 125.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.9 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 127.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 127.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 117.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 117.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 32.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 149.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 149.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 137.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 137.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 139.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 139.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 131.6 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 131.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -25.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 106.3 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 106.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 14.1 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 120.5 ft 1 N V 8 N nw N 0o kb ce M ' N NN Ce O N M N O. — N tC ` ' `�' N N O t0 $ 4u ^ LD t-I n %-i I-I N t"1 N Z O Tr M N 00 v in CO N CI rl Ir $; $ O cz ei N 0 g d m 0 er N ORI o 11 0 0 Q1 ± v O N = 2 Mt L 'a n 00 ✓ 01 tC u N it; ooo to N a7 C 00 L m in I- C C 7 L cu cu N O M a+ ei O C tip C - ON et ^ N r't N ID N ato t0 N O ) a) N T M N pOc..,Oto Vo(NI I N c z z I N 3 N . v ti u N .. fj bp O i.. N aS IN r .- O Q - Q. N — ` d N ea co t 4,, to E ++ +' E •+ 0 E O t4 - C C •i of N O to a � � � a E C `� d N aa; E E ns `^ N °� ataE CCI c V V ... to - O V ` to Cll v v to t RI t V O +' 00 V E 'a a V a u 'S t, O a ++ C O co to O O t0 _ V O r = d = d i — O 3 it I 1- LL m LL m H 0 CZ LL C I —J,_. T 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O L 0) D T a aeaA T a c c fl. u_ cca Q V1 -' Vi aJ CD -, -, V1 C CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 214 of 260 R-62 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 61.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 61.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 123.4 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 123.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -12.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 110.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 110.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 89.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 89.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 10.1 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 99.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 99.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 85.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 85.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 17.0 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 102.8 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 102.8 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.4 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 104.2 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 104.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -6.8 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 97.4 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 97.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 104.6 ft i - g N 0 O ,N M.A N N O W CC Lo i N n$N in N M U .-1 U co L CD N$ + $ $ $r M iri a; to M .q n 4+ ecr41 M O �i ^ M !V N •Z 0 ,n .1 E ^ m _ C 00 N N N p 4-1 N Z 44 00 tp C 4- c1 m IA ma-I o \r \P".''' Tr �"/ M J O 3 O N = O w do 01 OMO. O u C R :� O�0 cri m `° N C t0 a-1 p V I W 1 /\ er N O ei N p -- >. in 0 N pp !a 7 0 In 0 N O uO 0 N ON N v QO Q M vQ . to t Cr N c (c s c sE 4-0 440 C — N N 0 W ° W v 0 41 al 4J C H 41 m 4J CO QJ C1) N a) c U U U coo CO CO ro v ra aJ U Ra u O. L .Q n' a d a O. a 6. — 6. 3 0 = ra = fti 0 = 3 u- X F- ir. Z �. Z I- ii I 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 N. 0 0 N N Ni N N N N N N N — Oil T 4` J +� v v Y a A a c c o. '_ a Q n vii v) Q c CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 216 of 260 R-63 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 90.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 90.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 120.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 120.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -24.8 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 95.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 95.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 99.1 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 99.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.3 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 106.4 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 106.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 88.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 88.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 88.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 88.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 17.3 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 105.8 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 105.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -34.2 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 71.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 71.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 44.6 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 116.2 ft 0 0 N t CO 0 0. lqr - N O LO CC t... CC O O N .0 c N co 1 LI) 0 � iie t e70 O N N pp O M U r.1 LL/ LA N iN-1 01 ei CO i-1 ri N IV • ri It r•I Z 0 ,n ri r♦ 0i _ nj '� N V 000 0 N $ N N N O 0l N $' to Z M O 14 a0-1 1-1 0 c m v G .-Id M Sm. in r•4 Ci m ± sU 0 3 Oidi O N = �• J` T LA 13 in 3 a C CO CO c bn iv 0 t0 1 !------ ri -` — N srs I-1 e] N 00 = 0 = >. i„I N O (5 N U O b V N >• a. .a l00 v Q N u l0G LA a) ,..1 e0 T tp NI C Nca o a0, E C 3 Ea HEv in E a, U y ea eo eVa U (5 fa V U a L 'a a s a. la •L = o = ea 0 1 2 ii H i,i Z Hz 2 — ! —t. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N L no a JeaA �- a c c n U-CU f- Q V1 V) -,7 el 7 CU -, Q LC) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 218 of 260 R-64 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 107.9 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 107.9 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 119.2 ft 2007 Beginning Width(6/06)= 119.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -9.0 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 110.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 110.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 112.0 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 112.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 9.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 121.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 121.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 109.6 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 109.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -2.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 106.9 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 106.9 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 15.2 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 122.1 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 122.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -26.6 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 95.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 95.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 11.8 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 107.3 ft 0 — — — — — — 0 N O O N N N p ■A CC rn �/ O f 6 N 4 C. i N M in N. co ei Q ac o C $+ 4.. , c c c c $ c c Q1 �p �O N 'Cr Q1 N 00 L V NM s"I n '4 rioti M N . O N e� ' ' I N z L _ 1 0 4- e1 1 L vr in o) m 4 N N _ 01 . N al al — ...V.......°.°464.4%*4.4%%6%.1414 N !y1 I N O rtCri �-NI $ Q M •d M ris O M vsm el o awl O N MO M2 O V 3 L N u v m c d cc m C N 41 0 1 I to O ei , N O WI N 0 N 3 e O tm O N ..... N (10N N GJ v +'+ 0- L w. v Q G v CU L 60 L >, N 0 .N.. 0) eq f0 CO e-I f0 in e�1 _... _ V I E _..._. u- —I. ____ _._-r3_._. E N o r%) H E. U 0 a 3 CO CO 41 y E 47 N - a) _ C a) m O1 C v v cki CO a) CO i CO u • E. a a o I = o ro o _ Z 1 I I— ii Z H ; ii 2 i _ O 0 0 0N e-I0 0 0 0 0r•N 0 0 in N N N N N N N N N N •i Cl >' a JeaA >' a c C a LL a Q ii ,n ,n Q v CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 220 of 260 R-65 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 111.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 111.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 135.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 135.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -18.8 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 116.3 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 116.3 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 115.1 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 115.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 6.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 121.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 121.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 114.5 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 114.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.2 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 103.3 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 103.3 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 23.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 126.9 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 126.9 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.6 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 127.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 127.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -2.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 124.6 ft S N 1 . 3 ,WA N N O 0 NYe d 0 N 0 M a)1 u 1 N coir c m up 1� ei N el ri ^ O o M r+ t� 00 rii 41 rl 1. , N N Z O $ $ $ Oto N M $ p `1 M 111 06 N ... $ 00 00 V e1.n co ri pi = Q z N .,. m m in ci vi IA v M J 1-1 O v, O N = O� C t 3 -0 L , u ca N c ^ m co H 1 onv) a) O O N O vi N i— .�-_. ,- >,. O O en N 00 3 a-i N {O N v N N til) N G. kO c Q ^ 0 in ct ..illr 0� ti i-1 fa 1-1CC l u I v .�._E N C yWi ° £ v ° E RI 4.1 C N N CO N a) C L.) u CO u co v u w u ii L Q. a 0. 'a j a 7. o 3 2 _ ,3 2 z ZI H ii z F it 2 o ,,-c m ,N-1 O 0 o O 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 - •L bb >- a .leaA a 4-; v v ,-% LL c a U UI CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 222 of 260 R-66 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 117.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 117.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 146.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 146.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -10.7 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 135.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 135.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 128.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 128.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 130.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 130.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 124.4 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 124.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -9.2 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 115.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 115.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 15.8 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 131.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 131.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -8.6 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 122.4 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 122.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 6.3 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 128.7 ft O ---- 0 E. N N 0 g03 N O.N N N— CNI Y N M v co 0 it U N N $ INI $ 6 N in N r e-1 N C rl ..r - LAu01 ei N JA ei v Lio- Ln 00 Q GJ Z C w m Tu m 0 o fs m ± M co O N = - 011 .c f c ir 40 *r Z •r ir e - s r-,• O 0 M co CO n Q1 u1 3 N 00 .f•si.-Ie� O 00 e- t0 N R v as o Z °J m C to u) N 0 to O o N N eiO -- t- ). --r in N — 0 to 3 1 vi N. O i nNN ��•• N OA N r CU 0 N ++ 0. :i5Q U vi .0 RI 0RI rsi • N E N V C COC 4a E cO C N E CU GJ CO H a) C u Ca v 10ci) COv ea u u. Q a a a i a '� 3 2 = f0 O 3 Z = 1= Ir. Z H 4 -,- 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O N N N N N N N N N N op > a IeaA a a c c n LL Q V1 V1 -, -, Ln Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 224 of 260 R-67 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 159.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 159.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 183.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width(6/06)= 183.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.9 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 176.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 176.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 160.2 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 160.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -8.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 151.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 151.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 150.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 150.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 152.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 152.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 12.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 164.2 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 164.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 8.0 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 172.2 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 172.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 2.0 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 174.2 ft 8 N - u 0 �/� 0 0 N 0 CL 0.A N a)0 W ' I (C) 1 N MN rC Ec V o. .E. N in n vs — Q1 qi -1 Q Nup VI LIIv \0000000:4 ..............:40Y116° in ... IA N = cs in en a1 i Le) 00 Ni 0 = Q d Z C 4-- - M y M N O f0 + m M gO 1 O0 N = C 1 GJ w z ..c = W .0 Cn N tc LO oo ni U1 N .i 3 u . as . Cil ri C a1 .� u u1 a z a) c m v) c m a) a) 0 W0 N p ai N 0 N — — v) CO GJ 0 N N N u N a-1 ++ C. . ko -C a an-I I 74. I LA 0E LL r0 6 E +. £ +. N• V) 0 0 3 RI N N E 41 H E Cl 3 C GJ co GJ C u v u u to v u f0 u • E a L o = o = cCa o i = z I z j it x 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N _ci 71 ao .IeaA >- o_ a v U- a Q v) -, in vim) Q -etimmummi CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 226 of 260 R-68 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 151.4 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 151.4 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 146.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 146.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 18.2 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 164.5 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 164.5 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 162.9 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 162.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -12.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 150.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 150.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 151.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 151.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 152.3 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 152.3 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.5 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 150.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 150.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.2 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 150.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 150.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 10.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 161.5 ft O O N - 00 UI 01 et NN. 0) .-1 U Q U E. E. a1 kO O 0enICr M sn .�.+ O M m rl Irl ... O N e Co of co N 0 .--I z M N • m m O V LC; m o '.0 ri m m 3 `... O N = O 2 o eu c = .. '11 003 4J r 4 r-1 ; ei N ti `--1 .-1N u ra m -0 Zc m Y N v) 00 a) p rii O O N N r1 1-1 O O --Q-., N N N oli. coC >. N v O 0 L.0 Li N N N 4 N0. ,.0 c Q CO v to d .I tp L >. O eu ri f0 CO r-I !V fO — u G 1 2 _ LL _ -.._...J...-. £ 0) ea 2 N `. 0 0 W E d H E ce N E d v to CO kr v a D. a s a i a L 2 = ry o ii = I— ii Z H ii 2 1-__ -—• - --- _--r- 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 O O _6 L oo >' a 1@aA 4-; a) 01 .. 'i_ a a v)) � vii � � vii CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 228 of 260 R-69 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 116.2 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 116.2 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 140.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 140.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 10.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 150.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 150.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 140.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 140.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -16.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 123.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 123.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 130.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 130.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.0 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 132.3 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 132.3 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -16.3 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 116.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 116.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 19.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 135.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 135.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 13.1 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 148.6 ft ,a. O — — — O N ='''. I) 8 Naw O Q) 0 N Nw N et N M n U O Q a-i U ..' cri .9 Oat _ _ eeq M M .M-I .... e-1 v r..r O la 11 in 0i 074 ^ a4 U) 0 M ▪ Q M It z 01 m , njM N Tv- c». N g .�.r m O in06 M -r O O O N = v O C �l • T 1.5 w It 1V L n1 00 ' 01 n Nit; a- ^ Lf1 3 V 01 r.j O O 1%.. a� ,.j ell tl1 t 01 u coc I 1 Ln co co OD O a) N h. 1 LID i1 O a-1 4 N aO N Ln 03 RI 41-1C a'1 ri O N N ' v 0 pQ 'w N VI mLfl 0. Of 4j :13 4.0 s Q u. ►__ ---— N c (503c s c CU _in o MI ezu 0 a) 3 E N N ,ajE cow in a7 C Tou V RI CU C U u 01 ro a N a a a a a 'i 2 = o , = = iZ I F- iZz r U7 x 0 0 0 e-I0 0 0 0 oh 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N oA >- a .1eaA T a c c a u_ a Q -' N -, N -, -, N CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 230 of 260 R-70 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 72.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 72.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 167.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 167.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -27.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 139.9 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 139.9 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 138.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 138.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -15.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 122.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 122.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 130.1 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 130.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -10.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 119.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 119.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 108.5 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 108.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 21.8 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 130.3 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 130.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 9.3 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 139.6 ft e o N N- CD0 -moo, a a,N C- co in j . t (I)n 'i U Q U .-. C .+-r. m 111 aF L 0 I"1CP ..-.. $ N eq .-. rl 4.- M N I-i v in N �' Li) CO -J 0 01Z M 1N CU c 4-,- m N am i m o %-I m 0 �N-1 O 0 = O cc 47 CO s rl '1 0 N G1 Q1 Iff ++ N r-I-I aM-I tG N 01 45 M NI-1 tco C1 f0 -a Z m y —_. __. in to OA C OJ0 i _ 0 a,-1 N i 0 N - - - N _._ — } › O0 00 (5 N '� 111 3 .10 = >, r{ N 3 0 > N CON N N 7 N +: 0. .Q to t Q tD O al 01 . t0 i �, 111 ... M ..r ty N CO in E s E _ Gl ` O4J t00 o c E +a +' G 0 RI v u RI CO la u d i ..... E. fl. 0. a •L 3 0 = 0 = x I- LZ Z I LL x 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N xi •L on >' a .lea, a CV a c cCD n U- Q N ', to -, -, to Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 232 of 260 R-71 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 64.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 64.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 177.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 177.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -32.5 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 145.3 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 145.3 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 138.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 138.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -9.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 129.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 129.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 131.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 131.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 125.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 125.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -13.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 112.1 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 112.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 11.2 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 123.3 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 123.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 20.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 143.5 ft p S C IN V r 0 IA N o N v M 1 - 01 d N N cc E N M i Ct.N � N ul N 00 0 r1 Q U ^ LA 1.11 ei ^ `�' .... 0 a„1 ,.., an La M in i1 N 111 ^ v 6f1 N .4 i v 00 igt eq 00' CO N 0 -4 tD m Z N NC m N N TO m N fa o v M O O N m OC Td4 .- t N d' '"1 U1 N N N r4 00 0 1» IA ri ri i N d •-I r.: 00 3 a d M N , r1 N r�-I .0 fa fa 1:3 Z CO c o c _— — n N c ew N. 7, NCa ID 0 ^ 0 4 e-I-I N N N ^ -- '!� -- 00 00 ID ci CO C Na N r1 3 N 0 ... N N !0\I Q. t 1 N Iy Q. 5 Q O V r-1 a) _ t0 L ›+ ; 00 0 N .Hi Q e"1 10 CO I j rl f6 N E d o £ O — ._-____..____.I E 3 +-+ 4+ I N N fcu tot.)(0 CO fy0 14 m cv V U V °- .L. Q. E a 0. ! d •i = 3 C = w 2 = = ii = H iZ Z F= , LZ 2 __ _ j---_ `., o � m � -4 1-1 0 0 0 N 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IN NI NI NI NI N NI (NJ rsi ni ea�Q = ? a c c nLL -Q n n cn `e.. 4101. CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 234 of 260 R-72 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 75.7 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 75.7 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 194.5 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 194.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -27.1 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 167.4 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 167.4 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 156.1 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 156.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -2.2 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 153.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 153.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 150.2 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 150.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 148.7 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 148.7 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -21.1 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 127.6 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 127.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.4 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 122.2 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 122.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 33.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 155.4 ft S N N N 0 M ',-Ce Io �I/ c+) Ids � CO N c N M Q in N (i) E. .1 U ` N t0 to O ^ t�11 a N-1 M rl .,,� M N 4.00000000074I to a--1 V gCt O 7 $ G1 i' M C N a..l e-1 N 0 Qw O0 r Z D M C N, to mN d O O N = O CO w g to 0 N to o m °' 30 ✓ N a..l N M O tD a"1 Neri V um C! ' to Z $ a) m as to N in c a) 0 I rti O N O e-1 N p N N t in i O 1 1-1 '1 N O O u 0 u N >+ 4. Cl 0 N 7 � ++ M Q. upel. u Q O O N V Q e-1 t13 ti CO In v .- N c (o E c _c E 1 C Ea) NE a)co v1 j E 3 v v y(5 v u CO CO u D. fla L a �, O. a L i = F= LT. Z I— ii = __ :. ........ ....._ co O O O O O O O O O 0 N N N N N N N N N N ao a maA a c c 4.; LL a Q V) . N -3s vii a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 236 of 260 R-73 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 85.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 85.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 128.9 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 128.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 26.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 155.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 155.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 156.6 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 156.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.7 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 149.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 149.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 150.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 150.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -3.0 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 147.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 147.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -22.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 125.3 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 125.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 1.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 126.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 126.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 26.5 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 153.3 ft 0 __ o N 1 O O N t N O O 6 N.0 0I i t NM t Q o q� E.+ M N. N CO ri of Tr = 0 � `^ in .� N M a-I v ri Ni Kt 00m en `-i > rl .V Q `..... z d c m- M d m w d f6 m ± m –1 O O N = O 2 bbC S t • VI N CO 1.0 I-1 N 01 Lel 3 ++ m � c1 N 01 n ccasN to -o z 1 E. m croN 4X1 ^ c 0to N v ... 0 tC Nc N O lo , in N Co A N 2 O i v 0 ' T N N NI LI G. ca v Q N 4-%:, a, v 11 r.1 O _._. —y __ _� u' I �— N O f0 E *+ " E a+ _ N N p 41 tt9v `0 N R N N E as N as E as c aim a) c v v v ca y v RI u Li. 'L .Q. d Q. •Q. d 'c I ° = _ ' z I z ii x O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 NN N N N N N N N N op .IeaAa c c a i ° a) iQ Q c -, v � � (I) CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 238 of 260 R-74 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 78.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 78.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 157.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 157.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.9 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 155.4 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 155.4 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 146.6 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 146.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -9.1 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 137.5 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 137.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 142.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 142.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 2.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 144.8 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 144.8 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -9.1 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 135.6 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 135.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 4.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 140.1 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 140.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 3.6 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 143.7 ft i_ I S O O N •A CU O� ^M 1 a mN E O M co e-I 0 C $ ZZ g .t N ,V st or ea Q 00 N r1 IA O 1.+.1 ,-4 .-i ^ �„c C ri e� N Q GJ ' ' Z E. V N 00 a1 .-i ^ 41 M ' O W. MIl rl d 01 C1 1.f1 01n N ^ v z O M o �� LA Z d }� M O , o o I-IOti) co G o J o 2 r `O 3 Q1 ru ca co GJ C 0] 4O., N C OD a) 0 tO NCD p --- , N _ 0 U) N Co f0 ,i 3' "I N O N N N b v N o. .13to t a al00 u v i_ v I 2 !iEr- v - N in 0 QJ U `° E 03 C N CD m N a m. 0/ G V v u ( ra u 03 t0 ir a a a a o ° = tv o _ z I I- ii z I- ii z �. , --Hi - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N L ob a JeaA a c c a LL a a v v) v) a CAC September 11,2014 VH-3 Staff Reports 240 of 260 R-75 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 91.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 91.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 135.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 135.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -24.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 110.6 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 110.6 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 125.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 125.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 14.2 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 139.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 139.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 139.8 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 139.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.8 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 127.9 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 127.9 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 135.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 135.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.0 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 134.0 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 134.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -18.0 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 116.0 ft riiiiW 0 — — 0 I N I ,A CS N r N 0 tx 1 0 i� M CD I V1 O. 1-.._. _. -- — — N v0 CU i U c $ $ $ $ 00 $ LA ei e• 0 M N n Q1 rl NOa CU iZ 0 Ln N 00 M eel v g 07, ti VI N 00 e-. $ z l» e�I-IM ir I c m m m J O N = o 2127 it C i L Ot 00 _, °1 3 L L cou f0 N c m co •,-, __i—.-- Ul VI $ 1 ,,..E. N c n 0 iii r. I CD 0 N N Il 0 N 00 f0 N0 v 0 O0 u N N NO C. .Q lit t Q 00 O u .-. n 0CZ *. r tz I 2 U. _-"- 1N N f(0 c .0 c ' to 0 0, 0 o v 0) C C N y CO H 0) 0) C t0 u v CO c0 d u u to ii L .- a a a a i o 7 2 l9 2 = 7 Z I I- ii Z I- ii = - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N ab >' a aeaA > a c C n Lf- - Q V1 ! -' n -, - N_ moi Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 242 of 260 R-76 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 70.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 70.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 138.2 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 138.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -21.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 116.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 116.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 109.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 109.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -11.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 98.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 98.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 107.5 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 107.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.7 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 99.9 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 99.9 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 4.5 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 104.3 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 104.3 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -26.6 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 77.7 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 77.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 35.4 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 113.1 ft O 0 N - 8 N C N 0 N.N a co N 1Z E� N M N (/) it aha 01in rsi V n N O' N C ci;1.4 uri Ti O1 Z (.—__ in o e - N it LIS Cr M ei M ... ei O v — N $+ .. •V N 0o $ 0 `� N o � $ c wl $ z C 4- N ... = m '-I M (p O m ± 0 In $ 0 N = 0 . ,i '.1 ,......• L r 13 IV 3 LC cm f0 c N y Co m co 4..,N N c 00 N 0 a) IZS- I N O ____--_.__.__e-i N ____— 0 in N CO 0 N rri c -g N O 3o N N N d4 v N Q. Za v Q M u Cl tp CCL ea ao ami v —._. C --- , u- C�C �r L N 0in H 0 d u E GC• J E Cl C N G1 m N a) c v v ii L .- . E. o. o. E .` o 2 = w 2 _ 5 Z I F— ii Z H ii 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N xi .. an a aeaA a a cu n Q wrr.. CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 244 of 260 R-77 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 82.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction] Beginning Width (9/05)= 82.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 136.7 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 136.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = -12.7 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 124.0 ft 2008 Beginning Width(7/07)= 124.0 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 116.0 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 116.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -8.3 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 107.7 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 107.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 110.5 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 110.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 13.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 124.0 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 124.0 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 8.4 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 132.4 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 132.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -24.9 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 107.5 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 107.5 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 7.9 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 115.5 ft 0 N N N CA OD 0 ,_ - cc a N N E N M co r1 0 CUa 0 C it 10 = go M 00 nv 1i t0 N a.+ ea M wi (� e-e a-I Q1 '9 M CI) Z 0 in e M O Ir tC `'� N ellN e-I 03 03 � t!1 � V O 00 C_ O d m � N OM1 �i O v ,-1 O N = O 2 E M 'a W co L rl uco co -0 v N N m Ln C M a) 0 N O e-1 _ --Q--- - �� N O N p } >' in O Cea IAC ri N G O N N N D I v N L Q u aa) - 'Ci i ? aO-4 O CU '� co I N f0 ei_._. v C 1 Z _, W 1-__ E , 0 0 fo E ++ E 1 a+ N in C a) 0 C c=a a� H E au N E CU C a) m a1 C v v = CO u co d v_ _CO u IL s- Q CL fl. .—o. O- ,- o p 3 O = co O = = Z I 1- ii Z 1= ii 2 o 0,-1 0 0 N 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L on a aeaA a c c 4-; a a c a) vLL a a c v, ? v, CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 246 of 260 R-78 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 91.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 91.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 124.2 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 124.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.6 ft End Beach Width (7/07)= 117.6 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 117.6 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 108.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 108.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 1.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 109.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 109.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 114.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 114.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 18.8 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 133.5 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 133.5 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.5 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 126.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 126.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -34.4 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 91.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 91.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 8.4 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 99.9 ft N N V 508 N 0 O Crt x-Cr NO x . l N M Cl) -4 al ig .c pp en "..et 00 N 01 eiO ci, ea03 N a^-I ^ pp e-i r.I M d z 0 Ln kr; .... 4 N 0 Nz d O .� ^ c rn it m .-i — C1 $ N o ^ 0 C1 Na m ± co C: O m Npi ri O N = Of..-.. C ... 00111 a—I w -.- =° 3 s 2 u co m eel pp to y N 14 I-1 N C 00 GO to d c N rl O O 'n N 00 N c O LelC 3 N O N ..... lib N 3 O. .0 Q Nj .0 A O o fa LL-- O E in N awl_,.__ tJ — N E E N — d 0 ,0 R c — 2 c .... - - COv u v = v ii L. o. o. ii L Z L. 2 2 0 = = I- I- z z — — - - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 N N N N N N N N N N _6 L on a aeaA a - c c a LL a Q vni in' -, v) Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 248 of 260 R-79 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 84.8 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 84.8 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 81.8 ft 2007 Beginning Width(6/06)= 81.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 18.5 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 100.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 100.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 81.1 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 81.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 18.9 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 99.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 99.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 110.2 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 110.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -8.8 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 101.3 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 101.3 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.4 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 108.8 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 108.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 17.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 126.1 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 126.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -20.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 105.2 ft O 0 --... N - Cfl CO 0 0 N N nw a) 0 Q' .41- al N t p N Jo tjj a) M Ln a)> --1 n co 0 $ w $ sr IV $ fr t 111 M el(13 t0 N U pi N O C C n n M Z 0 Ln g E rn N L M adalN E. E. 0-3 ,Cr VI N 111 il Ln 03 N 0 ' eel e� %-I Lix; ut5 �-I v ' I r-I r4 al r4 ll esi — m ri ri a m N O La O O N = O2 .. 0 IVw t ....,e t t ..0 v a -0 m cc Lf) to 0O Co a) 0 I V-. _.1 ._.. l00_..�__ ul II-I 001 N N m O CO N .-. LA TLD CV C Tr N0 Nti 00 m in ea I N C .Nr NI O I I to N = T= O '� = . T u- r-Iii QO O LA OZj 4:. aJ O O Q IN = 06 M e° $N V CO V d0. Nl0 I� a) 0 t W O v 0 I I LL O I LO f0 ;, m ov o E « E oma ; « off£ C Co N co L C C i Co C H CIJ VIa) a) o OJ y) N l 43 c Ln E E Ln a aE) - CC c n co Fco. « 0 a a a a o a « o CU ow 3 0 = _ o �. = c � 3 ii Z 0 OC = Li Il O OC LL 0 _ + 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N •L OD >,.. Q Jea,� �` Q c C n LL Q Q N CU !n -, Ln Q CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 250 of 260 Naples Beach 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 86.5 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 86.5 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 131.9 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 131.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -7.7 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 124.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 124.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 116.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width(9/08)= 116.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.6 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 117.2 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 117.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 116.5 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 116.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -0.1 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 116.4 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 116.4 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -4.3 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 112.1 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 112.1 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -2.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 109.6 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 109.6 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 18.6 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 128.2 ft s •ctr0 0 o N Co0N N O Il 43 M N Et E t N M N 1::n5.>"= )> _ '-I V s oo �n I o °° . '1 N U N �p IJ1 ad Z 0 in E. c 0 0 in ,L-I it 114 eNJ 14 ti .-i a) r-1 E. C `� N vui o0 4+ or m o0 v-1 as 0 '1 _ .--I 0 m > N ..r 0 N z a+ gml -N 0 E m 44: 1-1o m 0 4- o tA $ t +. ++ J Z $ CA 3 z q v R 00 m Ln I-. N Ovs N I 14 3 N a 12) s C L. 1 N (5 v HC •la `^ ic _ M v v = u ii .c. a I U. o = 0 0 I o Z z i-- I- 1Z = — — - 0 e-I- '-4-� e-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 NI NJ NI NI NJ NI N1 NI IN NI on a IeaA 2^ a c 43 Q- U- Q a Q -, Vf -, N -, -, to CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 252 of 260 R-80 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 93.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 93.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 101.2 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 101.2 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.1 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 96.1 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 96.1 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 89.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 89.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -1.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 88.0 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 88.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 117.0 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 117.0 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -5.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 111.4 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 111.4 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -6.7 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 104.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 104.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 12.3 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 117.0 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 117.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -4.9 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 112.1 ft o N •cl• N•C CO N a O. lA M O W M CO N Ce E O M to 0..= N. - co U he CO ir IV t N O e1' r O to O 00 O i U (V rj C I-i M Ill C1 1 d Z Ln �. 0 e N NI � aai .r v ai c_ E.E. O! ra co it $ $ CA�-i m 0 IA M .�. 001 rn > 1-1 r.... $+ ei o 0 Z $` - t0 .- o E m p M .� O 00 M r J .0 N g c 00 0oR if; m f ..... . co _ Ln N N ei 0 0 — in N 00 N-1 =N 0 N 0.0 N W Q u Mr VI 07 COat St t.0 O f0 N L- CO `n H2 _ v u v u = u LL 'L 'Q. •�. •L 0 3 0 0 0 z x 1- z x 1 i O 1-1 0 0 0 0 0O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N Y T Y v 01 C Y on a teaA a c 0. ii a . vn vii cn a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 254 of 260 R-81 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 101.3 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 101.3 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 99.1 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 99.1 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -4.4 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 94.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 94.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 85.8 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 85.8 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 5.8 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 91.6 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 91.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 88.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 88.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 8.6 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 97.3 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 97.3 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 0.9 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 98.2 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 98.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 19.0 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 117.2 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13)= 117.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -1.7 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 115.4 ft 0 N -• r C Naw N 00 1r) 03 cNI 0C d M 1 N co 00J o C Z $ $ t %.0O M N ko N t0 0 trj lii O -i Q1 N Ci 1 -i 1-1 0) Zt O in N •--I .. d C N 00 @ 00 m 0 0 < a. 0 Z O N 40. of �Ico o TS 00 c $ t = ^ C v O ra N O g 14% m e ......N/0/0 M G1 v. $ N M ei O m O 0 U1 N N tOCO ... .-. 0JO rn- rl 3 N O O N 3 a N G. 1 Q 0 VI 0) CO ter ea O N i CO 0) N 2 c C u _v u ! c v O 3 Z = F- Z 2 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N •` OA �' Q• JeaA T a c C a LL a Q N Vn (n a CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 256 of 260 R-82 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 73.0 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 73.0 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 58.4 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 58.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 11.6 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 70.0 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 70.0 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width (9/08)= 69.3 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 69.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 11.3 ft End Beach Width (7/09)= 80.6 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09) = 80.6 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = ft End Beach Width (9/10)= 60.3 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10) = 60.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 4.1 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 64.4 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 64.4 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 9.0 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 73.4 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 73.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = 16.0 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 89.4 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 89.4 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(2/14) = 82.8 ft 0 - o N VC CO Naw M CC h 00 aco N CC E M N a) a--1 U fy U RI Ir Ir t tG O tr; to O CO N N LO O C l4 Ci �, Q1 Cl` N ri �1 r�-I ...1 Z 0 ,n I C) C II)) 00 f0 00 fn 0 o o z _.____ o E m o M 4- 0 .c i+ 3 = e $ m � CO d 1 l at in m N NWO v N 1 V g N ^� g $ N LC Ighift 1 q0 -IA 0 ri 1 OD _ 0 Lel t"i Lrl N O O NI C O0 in Vp V N L $ O N rib M N fl. 0 Cr�� 0 V f) 1 Cr v C cs LL ! O (13 N __ E _ Lrl ,__N---�-- N O CO = L v ° 0 CO• c H fn C — u V CO fa = v • LL •L Q a u- L 0 00 Z _ Z _ — —. --___— _ o in ,�-I o� 0 CO 0 N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ch a JeaA a a c c a Li. a v ' v Q Q v, -, vi -' N CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 258 of 260 R-83 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 48.6 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width (9/05)= 48.6 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 43.3 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 43.3 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 7.5 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 50.8 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 50.8 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(9/08)= 61.5 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 61.5 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 5.4 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 66.9 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 66.9 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 57.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width(9/10)= 57.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= -12.3 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 45.4 ft 2012 Beginning Width (7/11)= 45.4 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 5.6 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 51.0 ft 2013 Beginning Width (8/12)= 51.0 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 19.8 ft End Beach Width (3/13)= 70.8 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 70.8 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= -15.2 ft End Beach Width(2/14)= 55.5 ft 0 o N -- tco N N 4.- Co 1 N co N N M I 61_ 0 d a ac U t tC O ir ir M N N. tet c0 O r1 C .-i ui Q1 N --i CI 11 i e Z 0 . ,n in . N a--I .••. r d C N 00 @ 00 m 0 o < o z 0 N , �_ -- 0 4 m O m vL- O .0 t 473 j 1 = r 2 V toN co N N $ t^G • al r..r LA LA N N. co a 54 ej . . = V $ N M O N v •n bb v N N Q �-„ Q N M U 01 111 CU CO LO eel __ 4 - LL _._.._.�__._--'--.._. v1 O T CIA 0 ° 1 la , = N N C v RS c.)tv v ; = u jy E 0. O. LL L p 3 00 2O O 7 Z I F- F- I Z 2 _-r — j— _ �_ - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 >,' +' J2a T a+ N a) ++ a A a u_ a Q v) vcu m 0) vi a i CAC September 11,2014 VII-3 Staff Reports 260 of 260 R-84 2005(Pre-Construction) Beach Width= 29.2 ft 2006(Post-Construction) Beginning Width(9/05)= 29.2 ft Beach Renourishment= Annual Erosion/Accretion= End Beach Width(6/06)= 34.4 ft 2007 Beginning Width (6/06)= 34.4 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 8.8 ft End Beach Width(7/07)= 43.2 ft 2008 Beginning Width (7/07)= 43.2 ft T.S. Fay= Annual Erosion/Accretion = End Beach Width(9/08)= 44.7 ft 2009 Beginning Width (9/08)= 44.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion = 8.0 ft End Beach Width(7/09)= 52.7 ft 2010 Beginning Width (7/09)= 52.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= ft End Beach Width(9/10)= 51.7 ft 2011 Beginning Width (9/10)= 51.7 ft Annual Erosion/Accretion= 15.5 ft End Beach Width(7/11)= 67.2 ft 2012 Beginning Width(7/11)= 67.2 ft T.S. Debby= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -23.5 ft End Beach Width(8/12)= 43.7 ft 2013 Beginning Width(8/12)= 43.7 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion= 15.5 ft End Beach Width(3/13)= 59.2 ft 2014 Beginning Width (3/13) = 59.2 ft Hurricane Isaac= Annual Erosion/Accretion = -6.1 ft End Beach Width (2/14)= 53.1 ft 2014 Countywide Baseline Map Series Prepared for: Coastal Zone Management Department Collier County, Florida Cofer County ."1".."161411"111 10000101,011101,00' I Prepared by: CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida CBI ro N Notes: 1.Coordinates are in feet based on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone, Cover griii v) North American Datum of 1983(NAD 83). Sheet 2.2014 aerial photography provided by Collier County,date flown December 18&19,2013. w 0 I fr" 1 t .. 6 , of, .c 706050^ r # 4 ii..la _ �.. o o (A ,yam 4C �, yaw 1 \ r ' rfi ' \- I r 1 . • ; " ` "` `,. \ _ • w - t 705900- 1 , r - ' t � i, • 3 ao r. ` \ s.,,r•l J 1 a R-22 IP . 1i..., \ yep; r ' *' Miiiiiiiii27. -: .. .. - ,' . - - N \ 4` rte_ , .' 'x'° 1 M '" i '', s, \ .M 14: " ` ' .. 70 i # i. .$' r. \ 4 ew \ , , ° I' li` r. ►. ., ` „ 1 .� $ .{. a F a ittikr r: \ . 1. • 'tet+ ;4't'44 M -O .64*a f , 'R d�� '•R sr t • ' . r av 're7111;...14Ter't w mx rare �r "� \ r�'4,� s� w�., ,rte fid r a! s r 1'° r• A1 ro „, Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number U Distance to Vegetation # 1 9 ® Baseline Stations 4--II,Distance to Mean High Water e 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 C13 1 W – — ”" April 2013 Mean High Water .11111111111 Feet o IF "s K I s...., wq \ .. co + 4. Y 1 .p0� a, _ w'1 "*11# \ ' fe. ,.. .,_ , . . , , ,, ,,.. ,,,,,,, , + .. , , 4 ' * .p O r1 A'' r.' tie Itr \ .fir°t;IL "Air .t,- " : ! .+ a# Ai* ► 1 1 r f r.• r"„ ' • fig' mow' \ v < 1 + , 'r 1 . ; �. 4 \ Y•R � \ .wt \ 0 .4'41,114‘., � "� 705450— x1 \ N 1 c ,; ►, \ ie ' —lii, Or \ m in r w N g 4.;:oilit D +t{ ►.r 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number t #2 =' 0 Baseline Stations 4-0,Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C 0 � w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o -r-. , ...„,„ \ , ; 4lit%i, �, 1L7ii., 1 •- 4V -(R( ** ,p 1 . 1w, , . , I \ *✓' :404 r : keg` I o " #� 111111,. I �. ,,-' , . n, \ y" - ,M \ ' , , P ..:11.14/. lossk \ *` \ Vand4,, 'ilt GuiI�- JCr.. r 1 \ 1 w ' 1 fi . f . • 1 ,,;. -2 . tstliiblt ‘, 4 , 1 ,., 'f^ c rx,k. \ • .a J r - ', a .. . l U I r' iA 1 .a 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #3 ,,L,' ® Baseline Stations 4-0.Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water o Feet 4 W \ ::::01.4:14-1% .,.•• • ,1,...;..6:4:‘,,,,,,. *1101''. l'i, , : , l,.,---_, d.„4:40./.....„, , * i:,.,44,- ,tn'CT:. Air . fY: 1 T RZ� _ Y e*,44"-* 2:" ' - ie, ,..„0„,,,.. , ., ,...., . \ -^ • , „ olir, S3N*, ; \ ,, , . -* .fisit iZt, .411 fie, ,.., \ +E1© JIlik *AO 1 1 +, 4y i ** te' 704550- 1 +" flt \ 0 ""' ., ` 1 -, , \ .,' ., w \ ; r r,d F „,,,,r45):*) V * ,,r, ,, a,,, \ a 13 0 , .., 116 1will, . l oo 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number Ti `% 0 4-1*Baseline Stations 4Distance to Vegetation #4 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 ; ,a 411 w` - — -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet t .,.. , r '1 r, /II t‘'' imirtfra'H ', `� *sot 4 ,ft, t ... .I i'� 8+0 ' O ,, II!!, e #r4 N lop 0.• 6°*• \ • \ 4 i t�Tt` , e i s ill r ' i ili r�- w1 r.y,r, 10+00 r o 75 I o ul en ` ,.♦ ai eN Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #5 0 Baseline Stations 4--110.Distance to Vegetation LL'. 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C 1 LS — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MM Feet o II . - ` ,►^° 0` ilk' 'k'.t ,\ 2424 `� :t, 8 4, ,.Lr 1 • ellao ' 1 '" „ ' 1Arr_ • 4 . 1 f- d V 1 # z,- 1 '` Vkl:111.1.:.' . -\ 0 II."1k Sk 1 '` 0350 1 r 1 1 I Fr k' 1 � r . O 1 .�4 . I Zays R,170 0-; '' ,n u n7brill',( n f I '�. 0 , v '! 0. 1 w 1 0350 .n w 2 Legend: 11 d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number T5 #6 d C) Baseline Stations 11---10.Distance to Vegetation a, d 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cit w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o }, M.,::4+00 ti. y 1 c 'Al'''' �' , Of + 9 _ 4 #�i,a 1f 1 ) ; 4'�. • 1te •t +00 � I; 1 . 0. \ talk 1v,,, 4 1 , 1 1 s 1 „‘ 1 r-m . . Ba''yshores u Vgrllc`lc�rr n(kc(N'ucs��ij 1 1111 i t .0, , . ., _ .. ., , . ... „„„ , • 1ao. 1 1 1$4 �T I .lff: ''' *:ff1;. ,* i 1 F 1 fN. 7. 4. i +Qi o 1 : 1 cD, 1 - ' V * ,. .m'tiiS' ►` 03050 Legend: FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #7 U Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 504„,„, W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MEM. Feet 4"--1--2" a I if 4 ria�1 .J' )* °Yr' . , 1 t ,,7� r 1 ,,`. y ,a 2. 1 ---- 7.1114 1 ` 'r.''� ` A.. Mo. I, lir it r 1 o $ ,_ : • % a 1 :/ IV 44' 1 e•'•oPO.1 ' - **o.,„„,013"/ ' yds to 1 1 A I I ..-‘*--„, ' ‘01111/ .bs. ja KA, 1 Q � f ,�1+w'f1t*'' w"'elk *Y•W PJM'_ 11 - ' 5- 102 , fi 1 • ` 1�g3+00 Y. ..—. 1 �` `r V 1 I I . t: /, * e+1 1.. m1 + we - _..,. .... Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number T #8 ;, Q Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 14'4 — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet '"--i -I` • ‘,w • - a ,y;o. i 1 ii i�'' .-..r.. ++,,,�[y k yr .� gli�Y p ,'J a a aiik ., k � `y 77Y ita A I 4•' ` to e.$ f."�i4ij�► • C4-i:* � ' di 11. f - ° �f ma.I0Q 1 `w *'; I k' : ;:11 A l I I: ,.,4 °• :I►-. y . 1I 4 7:\ ::. i e eF M ' "mit 702450 I ,,41,F' r I i 1 r.5+ * ..1 - I , 1 �i�' 1 `'G OU 1. r 11';', d m ,. .,1 411:1., I ‘,. ,•, •,ti.irt ... ...„.. .-. • , „._ Legend: FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line z Page Number #9 d ® Baseline Stations #—►Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline 44-0.Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 or.4A,, w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 0 • '1 �.. .q � .yam.. ■y ,9,` + 1itt� 7* 1 04 u z t 7S 1 r t�. :al ' �1 1 #0 0 two` , ► { ,'. I4 '.01:;:r _` * 14 4.e 1 , . , 3. 1 .,• . I. 4.4.4 1 ,,:x..;,':' . '''''': k .1":; ' .v119". ..s., ,.0,......... ,.., 'AlifirEPI:,11.i,,,,..,IsS.,.. .if! 1 ,,. eta• , 1 „ .. ,J1..+000. "" 1 y ry \' J 41' I 1 . f,r 4 • 7 t,1. '4.,•,;:rfir 1 - ! �4 1 • M el . +t x..-.r 1 "tor ".." IV- , ' Ilk 4 ■ 1 \ it . 1 `' R,26 ,..i.„...,..•,.„„0.-" 'F +ter ;Y'Q s 7D1850- 1 O « 1. " t 1' „f ., ( l' ,0 41t.".._ , yl,,- A' '. ,,,,—,,,f -.... -, . ,loparto„, . ga 1 -p17" y. 3j Ill 4* 1 ; T5 1 Uio 1 t1 J . 1 I - W 2 Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number o # 10 U 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 '‘,Cjti w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o gi a . 1 1+00 1 -Y - Y .:1 1 , a c \ 1 L-a Playa B-',(615") © t , r ' 1 , lit-e.,:. 7...)- :-Ir. • 2+00 p • ,Ar .S 1- y .;,. 14 1 ,% ti '4.,..-j, 1 1 r ,OK Aai2' 1 I - 4'` 1 1 1Ilt 4 . it .,11,4-,, 1 0 :cp , 1 a 1 •ua r�rj li 1 1 1 ,,,,•. " ;- Y v 1 O. W .41041 ;, t U Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 11 #11 0 Baseline Stations 4-10.Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 1Ri w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet u q r r r t. kk 1lit , , s 11 .: , ro o,,r • • r .dr ., 1 �+ -.,x ,/r:•�wr 701 } 1 1 N' Ilic I' a 4 1 c ,.•••�"'" ,� 1 1 i ` 1 - 701100— 0 t- \ 1 ,p It, tt 1,61 F' � �. • I \a t- t•, 4,.e /� j �i1 {fit! `... V, It� J ` f 011)rl� 1 it1 1 Nfc ;„ } Io .�. �i 1 • z,• E I .' Cl., I ' . Y 1i0 o ;4 a co x CO CO 1 r _' I Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number t # 12 �, ® Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation 69- 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cl.L!! L,..., - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 03 II CA .... 4 -.4. V o 1 moi 1 ' °; , ! s r 1 r %soli Y 1 , 1 1 r .. r 4-01,:t. . ; +�2 1C2.off ,.<,. • ; 1 1. ., 1 ,,;, :• 1 700650 • 4e 40 1 . f:4" itr .t 1 • ,• • 1 c. 4 , .c. I 1 , `;:a'- .. _e .^' gam` I * ..., ..t.... , : ,_ illervt w 1 0 r 6 R' r x cv �.. r co Legend: il dA FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number z #13 y, ® Baseline Stations f—►Distance to Vegetation L 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CBI w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water 111111 Feet o I g 4,-',Iii- ' 1 1 i 1 , '4�4 I 'r. r, 1= I ,,' f -. . "' 1 ' ' 14 5+00 :‘1 O ~� ' .s* 1 C y\ ': .1lN., r. ;` 1 - ' 1 _ 4 It s 1 } I ° " : I ' 14, . 4., gik. 1 I 4:441‘. I ' -.„,-2-,k,„- „, .314„,,„, ,r, ......r,,....._ .r il Ill 1 • YFdr• _ r ,. A.', 1 i , ;. . 1 �'i 4' ♦ -.' -0 1 k a1 1.1 m 1 A U w 10 4. l6 I ,y co Legend: 12 L FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 14 U y ® Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation Li 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water a 0 25 50 w - — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet -1 ill o 1 1 y I 9100' o � I \ miraItyC \ince o6�� - ;F Al; , , f. 4111' it. 1 ,'' • 1 - :-.,00 ` 14 � . ,,,. _ . -, .,4 ' irill .1 t, 1111 I „ 14.Xe4 Igo, I rgoo F �4V'g nMe : �°IA I . 'a fi' 4:11 ilediwyd: 1 ~ 3 I BEY 0.-1* ' _• 1lt � . ■R28 I e I .x J', 1 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 15 U m Q Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CR W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water _ Feet CB ,,jj i7 r I V y I :�, 01+°°VanderbilE=c4Dg6n l f�l6 ,f' hu• 1 �; lorl'!w 1 '%'R".:" , r," ' t In I .- v.- A% 4 I c 11 2+''00 I '4, I ',,,A\ . 1 ,� Iii .�r R , , • °%'iiiWINN '+ a I °i1 l Ra•- Ec_ .A , 3k_ 1101 A I i �' 1 , /, Vtt'5," s y l ,,r ,fir J + 1 . ,I- * ,I , . .tai f. t 1 a• t, eq 0r - { `; lig.iF-•. 1 ' s , ` � . • • 1 �� Y r r • I -431.y ., rg iDgPT'• "i 'kh Gam? I a .; • i j th *, r• V * N rak. , •,\ .- , . I 4/01.— , V. .,..4 ,-, 2 I i5.0 r0 I . liviiii X 03 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number t, # 16 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 'g- 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 b Li) — — —April 2013 Mean High Water i =NMFeet LOX) I CO A „„ - Mi .r A 1 ti �P,M.s •rib, -'',1 Vele!rn1 N c 1 (�l ,, I .. *► t' .. S! � • '- g$', . I s+oo hi,4..\, va 1 c I I ” I , .. Ailii,,,, ,., 1 " - 5 *Pir • 1 7 l ,, ah tr. I 4+t 7.111 s9,0tlpi Y �Gim[� i °s3 '� Si ra NI Ots- fi 1 - .� S., ,-A.4 r\ x R-29,' j • 698850- 1 20,E � ) ` f v i A w Mrit II. � LV fifc j,'Ni 110 I . , d r't IIII m �. r, Y J ,y '. 3 .s ,t 7 • 'i W I 111 _ O /� ,L, `� 'f ' ,` 4 ' o k • ' .° , Legend: 11 d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 17 ,I-, 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CE3I L., - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o ' , tits'' r. • -i'....,r, r 41.:' � [ 9 j} J �. • . 698700— 1 �x .y;c:, t 7. " 1 0 . , ,,tea; .. , " f- , '",,,—.1 ., . inw- R + ,r S ' ' ✓, '' r *04, _ +P"' _ 1 ". Its 0 +i. r ,. r ' t s, ,r s J .4 ::r 698550- 1 ,r ni „-,`'Irl-'/k4,'•' Irk -'44 v.4 to' w '`f V.416V 6r 't 1 , ' r 4 c"+s Vii' , , -4.4. ` , ;' * x ,' 1 o a ' � yt,, /r,;,"! V 3 , . ''''''Cr "A r ✓k 69S400— V u'''...,..: . . .. {r . . . •4 tu Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number o # 18 d C Baseline Stations �---►Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Ci w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MIMI Feet l co +.> r 1 ' "C 4.-- 698250 Ia ,,.:: +.._,,. .rte ' • r r i ' ` or 4-4 or ' y -4 • ` .N'�' a Xr` wr �. ' , A . ,,, V'' , ' r • `. . 1 , . .r...-_, ' Mfr►\ '1r._ Y 4k4 . I ir ili ,C,,....• , .. .,„, . • ' � j , •may-1 4 .. . ' +.. . ,4,..:.. .y1. - 1 0 'A . ,;,44-00,,, •.i4 s ` . . 4. r �Tj' ....0 + ;044,1e * ', • 697950— 1 • a ` .iii ' , : ' • 9., �."• 4. ��M■ 'elf: I:14.44-1r'. s l4P,, ,er * a r wr' , CGa ct • ' iltrit", ,a, = - , v ' 4 -'ic 4 sf, -,7 ro L aV Legend: E A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 7 # 19 m 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation '. --• 2003 Baseline 40.Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CBI w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water MMINE Feet l co Q �J .l i� F W 1 �! Q' I .• „.wit'iikr R-30 tocie I ,;Y "?om '; p ^ J r 697800— ' l r °'�.� v �� a�� #VFX "z -4, 3 , ° - r p1a rwx"�{w ,per' : :rr + 1 fit? r ti, • ° -,9,ta�•; v., %A,,,„— e.:.,,...., ',,,k,c. :f7-., ;,,,,r3„,„; 4"...,'„0 . . l'-'' 4 d4 I - rOir i ! I .i. V' ' ”. 40 i„' ',, ;;" • `-i,t4-+#04L44.., ,1 + . ~ f r 4 • 'ax r 7 a'r ,it_r „l •`„�''Y, _, t�'__ • 2 Legend: 4' AFDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #20 Q Baseline Stations —►Distance to Vegetation '- 2003 Baseline ig H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 � 2. El — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o %I ' ' = ., `ry#!,4 , -mow;,, w T'y .. 2 7r+ 1 . 5+00 r , de 697350— I ° rte* mow:7.* .= 1;„:1'-e 'Ito ,,.. .- > t ;`. *: ,lam i ., , I " :-. vii,,,4 ...•. I M 1 °Cf 1 t' 1 opt" 1 1 1 1 I A' r ,. Bay Colony Clu • Ir). , . ,{ +,, • 1r ,. I 1 4-.e'''' - ' '+ ..rtir\ 11 ---A.r 1 .'6 705°- 1 ° a J N > �i U ' in 41. U 1 It r _6,t < 'k i . O; ."4, " 1 x t � I MK 4 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number ;, 0 Baseline Stations 1995 Erosion Control Line #21 t. ' 2003 Baseline —�Distance to Vegetation 0 25 50 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water �"♦Distance to Mean High Water Feet4,01 -1.A" o I Q ;r • { f mh 1 *' -.$1111t, ..,•••`F -• .`ii!".t. -. r.8i - , . f:___..w ri tqs, r• I °� -tom o ,"' I • `' i1 . ,, ...- $.,.. _, ,, ti' f c ,, v .ti The Wino' nP t;i4ig, I ; kyr I 6 \'‘y...`L. I iv IOC I .44, • c Aike,t ,..,, } '- ti R31 1 t.. • I 4 +.,.•mo -A i. ., I . 4f ' '.+.'' _ I •, +�!' a ,w 696750 Ir .k, rh.'' t a . 1 \. * .r i...,,, w r,{ I , -. :,r•, ., ,. I ` 4:u$.4 . I The Bil` or,. L ,;"'` '-:,'-'4';'\ +00 6966.• 0. I • En 4 (1501 i 2 Legend: 11, A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number t #22 ;, 0 Baseline Stations 1995 Erosion Control Line ' 2003 Baseline HDistance to Vegetation 0 25 50 C13t W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water H Distance to Mean High Water Feet l o I w s 1 :• I R i ', I 1`,7,` N, '-.,„, 74-17'.,''.,,r*' - ' oi,,et, .','.* ''. e ,, �i 1 : r 196450— O r 1 1� *..leyM ` . ► . lk 1 h 0y l r r ' . . ,: , 1 Irl 'IN_ ' , 1 ,' •• +w ,,•'.., 1 o ,„. .' ` 1 ,A 4 a1. • � f 1 y 69630t1- 1 1 • •'. 1 *tip. i- 4` ' a Brighton ' ,� t t4+ f � r '• I • ;lit 16411 i s c t r•, • wry et 4 `•1�� ' ate• •1Cr 1 f r .mea :". ,,•":11116.A..../c• ' ir .. 1Asi � ,,' ' e s 1 y+ ~r " r ,~,f 7i ,, _j:',",: , - a i. • w 1 ? i� r"'• i: ,' '.696150,- a, 1 H ;01A.,- • .lik , m Legend: 92 A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number T3 #23 0 Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 4-00'Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CE W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o 1 •f. f i1`,4" 'i ra, 9 { I f','...vii:z,, 1.* •' '1'; ''.21:1. , . , _ i ••• ,111,,,. 1 #,„„„' , -. c ,j`, .yea^ Itr., , 6: lr" l t ff . ' ik. ,.-'—'-„'".V i L�'j' Myr r' ' \ ,*'4' -,' %, . g.., ,..- ' \., 00.14. \ > `+,1"*.r 'r idcz '4.1 ,� ', /'/ ' "4:4y: 44' . ,,'' "i"i i.l7# The 'Carlyle I � . Y rµ0. ' I �� 1, 41. "r...*e r ,; :rte. ,1 ! 4 . 'ir4, t' 1 695850— d r+r 1016I'' Si R-32 r `' ,,., 1«-4' 4R LA gi" I '7 fr44 4 Z * • 1 .0" ..7 L Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number TD #24 V 0 Baseline Stations 4--0.Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water sAl a 0 25 50 Il W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MOM Feet cD I • • w -, ♦ ca 695700 • 1 »# G .., 4 1 1 �• Y +fie' :;'•.`r,1-4...' f" yr�;a> . _, +00, ' -;,-A-, ' . - ..' r..* 1 ¢ * r • ' . 4,?,41.T" _ ^ice . • ' •^: 4 l eaF ° . F ..7 . r If. 1 SAY ./ 1�-,y +yy' ♦ "4,-° ; ' 1 � F lr4 • t eh's f s• 4 I:K 1 a '< . ., . .,ti .,,,,. +`� w ' ,a4 ' 44), . ellagerir1L 1 ` 4 1 y i 1 ,- .4+00 a. 1 ',,,i*, - c '. ,. 'r`4,` .'1 � ,• +a . » 695400 1 as 7+f 5+00� • 1 1 h 9 -O 1 I ,+-• 4,,,,,,,, F d n „. a- J U 1 ` ♦ :. F• 1 0 . w d n M ro F� C. ,,*' a ._ , -^ 1 co 2 Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number z #25 d ® Baseline Stations 4-110.Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cit LU — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MOM Feet l o W I - t -` ' `' o b- * 0 695250— ` ,. -6+00 1 $ t ♦ +"' � " Jr r 7+oo - .$ Y O,? 1._ "' ;• - 4 „iv 41 w 695100- '- f. of f•rr ` ; " 8+00' at + = + r '' -.:1",„,*.1' . "IA ii r 4 , +I 694950— 1, 5. tt , 40., ; 4,- L' ' d m 0 r 5 ;wr m ./J t 't".La a ,u0 x 0.4 CV Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number o #26 V, ® Baseline Stations I Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cj U., — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet q o n w TA) } - ' R-33 * Y g f ` •. Pr t`r 0, " / _ 'r t, •`fit t ye- , t / .1. , r 11: ter 0 '. r. :1,:',4r.',:411,*::.114„,,,:::: w ;41.'.. :.\.. '' ' ' NO 4 hit - 2+00 1', .+ Y ' " , 1 „, _' r Or I Shu ta T� �, ; Li. • .R .. 40.b i-.� 'Y{►,,:i .4L = 1 I . t` ,; '`” ,per • 1 s 04500— 1 1 -a ,\ *_ , . I ' 4+00 ,T'A4 R11,,,,,..._ 56 oa Legend: • z FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #27 d ® Baseline Stations •4 Distance to Vegetation E, Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 1• — � d ., U., — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet C I :, ,.rr"' G ., \ '• F I y ,,-1 a `'i r £ r 1F O r J 1 ' _ 1 _. `4,'1,. '�h` hV ``/""4 w to, i, 10. f + . . 1 .; Pt' " •' • „J sO 0 as • • ... _ 1 I .. 1.6 , , I %. , " ' ,» ! 6942S00^i I :, 1 I , : „ a„ • I 17',„A-11 .'• .' z ,y � ' aS la 1 ; . t , • r 1 �err ►V ; y a iw� i t ro t, I t► * �' .. �r 1 - � • t � • � �j^� v 1 •` ' `"� 694050 I • 8+00 I% ., 1 °` 1 ,... -0 1 1 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #28 ,- 0 Baseline Stations I Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 11q 0 25 50 CEI W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 1 o t r �r1 . i w '��`' :71 li\ m1 �,� ,-- I ' 1 * o t ../ i � 1 ., t >1 s L1 ! ti. 'AP re f ♦ .4:..,440P,.. '. ,4.' af� I 1 • . . 69390 r 1w'. t.$.. `Igr 1 1 r,, R-34 _ I .A .( I .. . ' I A4 , .., ,&.ite4 , ---,),-,*;Y- 4` 1 I i4.— r.'' .-.%4 +"• k,, F� .* 093750— ' 11 ii ad 1 _ w �� d"5 r L T//' I . , IL 1 , 1 ,« I C r a �. I „�W: s .a 69380 4 I • * *°''' :cN = Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #29 m 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CE31 - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 'l o r t o' y 1 p yam, kr ti .Y1 ,.;,gin• 1 M " 1 + G93450- k' 114 •.4+00 ' ,� 4. 1 ! •a.0 1 • ,› 11 :� r #,' ,p ,, + yTM �( c 1 0 • Il A er r .. PrA: .fY ' 1 a . At ,tw. a bs. f, :**41 { 1 . 1t e,'' / r ,, r Fr . r ly 1 IMI ♦ '; M+.. 1 b' 10,74' 1 s " ' 691 50 1 a .?+00 .4iy irr ri \ .. o .y co Legend: FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #30, z ;, ® Baseline Stations 4—�Distance to Vegetation a 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water 1.1 Feet 1 ? ./ 1 }t1, 1 $+oo~ j te,t • I . : 1 .. me. t ,}y ' 1 , .. I t 9+00 -sy t 1 p 14 iJ.'434- R . . rift ..4 ♦ `•ri r. { ! a ti ✓ ,/ < . ,-47Kr. .4;°. ;;tom- r ? 1 ,e ...4 `+fir Py., •�0'+', I • t ' ,. 69280 1 ,, 4• yr R-35 x_ . ;:, , f - " ; �+F . 'fie" /,,...-' �1 Aft r 1 t,4 `I" 44 ' . x. 1 i k f I.r. fi gyp 1,i i 1+00 ' t. + r 1 , .;.4,.,1,,,' Ba2700 s 'f ,., ,,,," ,, i, le... 44:1 . -,. "4.4 '' - ••; 1 �,.■ r re 00 144 a. c Legend: FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number fp #31 Y, 0 Baseline Stations 41-10. Distance to Vegetation '& 2003 Baseline �►Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 S F.41,.. 44_1 fk&II w` — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet c `F`4* yP+ { '1 s, P" ' 2+0•�, OAP f'• • •� yy y w 1 4 1 t . T:� . ,• . , . A.:Lii, r . ) et I a '" I a, <' s 4 At Mj 111 • { `'"44 ' 'w* 692550— • + r�� r' •. I I ;¢ - t+ +" 1 1 a ,. 692400— 1 C" `�JJ� - c,.,.p _ 4 , 1,r # .` 4 ; 1,rk•+" 0 t'k i rc4 k 11 Peli«g[7 Rr [vinnnl \ W , :;lit ' 250— o t •' IN ' 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #32 U Q Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 : W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o O -ae> , W O ^ yter,• 1 � +. • 0..^ _ ,i '. 0 j_i t .i1# '' hf *,,..':,',.',7 . ------,—" ,,,r.. v171-' - 4., 1.,, ., ;r ay r "• F�; ��"" '' •' 692100' L" ` !" e> I -' P r -i 1 .A .t. r0' .- • ' I ` �^ I r . # 1. "r rpt. • tpI , t Mk ,,,„it c r. I :rL y ifs , 691950— 1 'o ` > ., _, �. � .� C p I .... 7 . ,.., • \ _ , 1 .i.,,,, . , ........ .„. „, .1,.0,,,,:t4ef,•—.7.....,...,7„;?7,,3,6;,,, ),..4, _ ....,..,,.._:. ,,,, , ' 1 , , .P.4 r -" „,..........' I 'IYp y J.'• r 691800^ 2 .:`� CO may. 2 Legend: 11 2 A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #33 ,), ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation Li- 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CQ LU - — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet CIE3 • 1 ,r dr•��j• 1 • . o : ''''-' :','v:- ,,,(;.. ...,,„ -.....,*, IA, ..-,,,, . .. . iv, 1 ..,.. , , . , -,444-,... -..- ....;4 , ; ..‘4; . 1 ,,, •-• 41,..), . '..:- Wel: 1,, 4. ..... .,. ,,,,,,..,,,,,..4 ...„. i ., . :,.z...,„, ....„.,,,,„ ...., ,...,„,, * ,,,, .. . ,-.., .. „1.7,.,..-: ,,, ,„ . ,,,,,,,,,,,,,..." iii,„ „if . .,, , 1 .... ..,,„, . ,, 3.. .4. . . , ,. 1 ....„.„... , .. ..,.. . .:._. -. . .. ' - -._ , .„ .... . : ....,..,.. .-. . .. ' - - ,..., 41 691650 1 ,wt ► , f w 1 r ,ff r e . - .4'4 �� ,tom .fy, r y rte/ .0. -i ..i T` 5'\ :jpi ;Alt J f 1 h 1 . 7.4 t 0,.1. 4 ,may t. ' r ar,.' "' "^ c. 'q:' -',..-irdl'o. ,...1 *°.*:r,,,4.4'tr'"' 4‘,0: *':-:.'t :it'''..1r."-4 t l'.?':Ir; - i ' • ''. 1 t I .....„4.: .si " A , • 691500.— p_ o Ib'r. fi4f.».�ri .� s'i:liri,,,,.:4:-.„* ♦ M1 ",:t." ; �M1 A T :",411-1,..'„jibs'''.' , , .:, •':42"4:,:,1 :• w 1 �< J 1°' •.+f 777 • i 4 y 3 ' 1 ��W0000 war"• I ,1' ,M ., • r . �+ /+ J • co 2 Legend: 11 m FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #34 y 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C . W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water IIIIIIIIIMI Feet o g 691350— 0 irk 1,te f 1 , Y w, t ` f t) F Ly} y �j�� T �4-r r t �� t rr . i'i f F. '[F . : y .fpr Y '0 • 'fit , t. ./ r ' 41,. '*4"( ;Co"' ' ' ' irg It 414.414 '' ...4 .0 '"„Akr I ., iv I, if .r ,.. ., sti-, t.,,,I..,-, ,, 1 ri Yr. . y% . I •w O .,m: ..57Y• 010 1 t fir** .: , ter,', • Ig... :Y r w �ti-.e✓ rt'i+4-• �„ yr 1 . A- -,» ', - 4912110 1 iii. wars t " ild* 1 44711 ��alpZ.'�"r�V w .* y T,`'�,J J r1 * 6; `* yrs� 1 '''Sp } „7y 1, , . 3,4i., • I ,, I . LM . 3 . - T , •;' 1 O,8 0e',.• }, 691050— i <s* 1 (.r , .- } x ,fir" ' " • . r I ��"�r ter_'t `.-♦�'.. ''..P... .r -' 1 � I1r 'Y i � g 1 ►, � P7''',..1 x�� "rw5rf M 1 l Y Y j' ✓ Q. al ‘,./' 49 �,y q ' , 1 ,.* ": - I .� "r rF y .. 1.CO T OD Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number t #35 d 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation ti d 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C131 w - - -April2013 Mean High Water Feet l o I J . , N r; . , li L i ort' 0 1 A ' y' + ,+ 690900– IL oft . 4 Co 3 • I ._ .SFr \ 1 14'- , rig 411.": '' ) , { F rr t I � ♦ ,-,..2,64.-; � 'fr,.'. . ..4*".''' ten • .^ � S'. 1 ,±r .-.,R37r! ,, , ' • ��/ to t*'► ;+ d .4' ,, r `„' +�.1H' ',rM1 r. I ' r•• ,, `''w ..1.4: �` 690750- yam+ Fo` " bo j I " , 4 .,, = .:`,),Wt t # °'' �� •,� .�� I ! '10�" yr ! " • —"'t •`� w x$' , r ,' { .0 ..r � tf 690800 . :t yI • .• k�), ri• ' r • i ,r; ,. •,,,.!•, 1 ',.:"..4' •, i f' alt .b U tY '� , •' ~ ..fir. `m Vis .f ' 0. 1 _- r.. ..4 . 'd - ,., 1 u CO Legend: E A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #36 ;, 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 4-0' to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CRj ,s - — -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 11�f o 1 rtr 4 ! 0. ms . .>r I k F %, 1 4.e .•, 690450- 1 !so SrY ,' r .Y 1 X 4 ., 1 %, % Vi` "4;' • I • , • . Xr, : of • *.f.' r ti 1 , ' .y - i' ,`=r.:- err I ; "u•� AJ `*,Y •1 10— !f Yrs W1 • � �' . • 1 ,.,:.*. u ,,t.• • ' , .._; . I r a , � � b 1 �' Alio'. o , 1 f. b , .,., ; "sem IV::*, $ ' ,y°^,,�C,i `: r '..r .,r. 690150— re T tt s. , "y "x�' fr , M . Y f .l , • ",r Ir'1 i a 1 iI t; tJf••,.:N •,' s r r' r a.. , + x }a. .r .F._, .i. ,, _1‘,.. . Lu _,y W si w .I�r'M _ . re*Y .. •m Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number UDistance to Vegetation #37 �, 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Mean High Water riri 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 C13 U-1 — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o W • 1 - :or'l *,a4 ar fit;':f A' 690000- ( . ` for i s rri • ►; ,, s a'r fi1 f.,r 4 tC . r 'Is c -• r '9'''`•a •` 1 � � 7, 4. w §^ f' " M' '5 ' 689850-, ., • + •,,ik r 'l_ } day ,/'� r ' N r • ,k* •� ,l�P'�•fr,• 2 ' Amp,/,,1 •y A l .r" 4. ti e 1 ,, n 4 40 A."' 7.., ,1 . .,J^ d r1 w • A n /.. r 6$97Q07 :VIVI ? on. I 4 ' jIfk+ . Ni' y 1 g f '61". r'..1 U • 'i _• ri 1 x . . ., i Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number H Distance to Vegetation #38 Y, 0 Baseline Stations 4-10.Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CE w - — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o 1 ,ter fir` lIC' cc ♦c T,,,sR - �. o filfr I r I rt °t • a , I J 3 ..� , R•{ 689550— $ ., rt. r —'� f•' , ` A. I - r If' f MSW , ..., t r ,..- J i 689400- 1 0I : . .` f . � . + M •C A.r. '' ,A 1. A I.4 ' fi ry 1A ' f. wl .Y"t ��x': Ye, J t5 � rt . ,..,,a; 0' rye" I `: ":. *-4,.:,. IF- ' '; - ,ts- 44,;,--.4, ....,,,,,-;i:rw ,,.,68 --') ,M r a w .• ./ .r y� x . r. •-- c, o ''.1 1 r t 0 4 lr M a y, 1... 6, I 4'. h to N 2 Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number U Distance to Vegetation #39 , 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Mean High Water P. 2003 Baseline 0 25 50t i r".4 l W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet • I ., �".«. mss,. � .r . fig= 1 �� y` }_ 777 i rJ,..A d -, ,, ''• « t A 4. 1 e 4 rk. * rV•r`.. F°T f'r .: Y' a ,,Li • 4 . 4e;,,,,.; ,,,; i►�. e; --.4,, 688950- fir. ` 4,1 //'-'• fr-tea .l, ,. r . J'� ti4 4 f l• Pa Pi A y w; L 1 A,,,•• t milt'{+'. •...."�. « , • r 5 f tr, • • Ate, , .tz , . y,:r..4. .4., P^ • to-lk ,' '4 r .x' ., r r.▪ µ tü8800 — •. dry 1t r y�� ' :.m 1/ ,it {it-,, I,,„' ,1fµ «rr m Y d g,1*: U t Yj jJf `rRt`' ` s w .F 'ta"'1� . x« „cq 1Ctom s «g+ - U ▪ � 1a y lip0'�"' CSV,y V LJ , f . ... t fop 0• r r'''', « isto R .f co Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number U �-►Distance to Vegetation #40 �, 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CE �{ w` - — —April 2013 Mean High Water MEM Feet l .lam` o 4. .4„. ..., t L.. _ ., _PA 74 ; .ei..,,,,i.::-.,-4.00::$0,-, ,,,,,,,,, - ,(, -,"...",,r_ • "x\t + -: .c•S. r • .• 68861O• „,.,.',' _ : r z't;:''"/Zi;. • .11346 i, a Cr 4.0.„,4i 1!'t, ':i ` 3 .r, f ,, + ' rag► ° a 688500– P.I.P.I. i. A .t '" is ` 4: ``44'� r' :04 ? .. r a , t ' " �' . s ' ''' . ' °: ... : . • .,t • 't stt �r „eri , � 4 * . 1 "r �", : . ,,,e'? ►. *ry 688350– ,,4 A.)."ciii . '4' _ • 4‘-' ,.. .., .. . , J in U • • „ a'-.9, com 2 Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number 0 4—�Distance to Vegetation #41 U Baseline Stations -41-0.Distance to Mean High Water P 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CES W '" — —April 2013 Mean High WaterIIIIIIIIII Feet o k4 -it— ` v o `^t •^ Fes. i .( . ,.4, , f. F .E' .-+' , s ' *i t k : ,.r l+ i,Y .w'F688200- -. het'*gyp �,• t �� ; • ems. •-z-:MAYA t, x, ,. .` / A, dom, ,. ,... ii. lt ' al r r• .,...p ' °}� .,,gym' r is> '4 . . "4; 4 ';'''' �, ., 688050- r. � atv Ag- k r 4%-s.. .-. 'fif I. •' . s c ii s r ^i� < Y7' «b. { '� rY .r. f I- Y .l ' R1t .. 4+ .r 7,;# . ...O.:" 4 '''. 4,r,„,... .... .), 687900- d 4 ' • , {f J m + .s w ;" • T i`J. t `. r U -+ {A.0;�t a-',,, ro 1" ' r 7,7 ,~ •`.4. kms, 1 v Legend: Page Number FDEP Monuments H Distance to Vegetation #42 y, � Baseline Stations ♦—♦Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 Aiiiii � W — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet -" r ? . .. * . �} ,w-.... ' # lbwr+ # �, f Q 4 l; 6 & rrr� • •/f „ 687750— LAK ,, s , ` 1 -,.. re`; 4.. 1 ),•,.44,0 1.. ,. r .w 1-,i19 ,. 4. x . a�- J - ':► ;^t t ^ w, ,*,..0,........- i-,,. , . pi, . V. ..�►n fir r . ,s, t ..0" 6x7600— �t � � J , y +— • T., V +/ �„4 r•y Aro ./,j s� rJ. + :'` y- -�* FAY-k. ;" r *. i+r- -- 1 "5.,...„-'1::,... '� '� �y * '�..� . 1 y'Y ,fir"a be y / '{. o r�w � a «xir a " ale" �..r.� .'. - ,A' ',4, 4,'° rr�7450— N `'�''y .�3 s, 1 w ' v r � f - r amo 3 CO 00 Legend: G FDEP Monuments Page Number o H Distance to Vegetation #43 U d Baseline Stations -4-10°Distance to Mean High Water e 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CR w` — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MEM Feet 1 ! 0 e ► - •-, .. gar A. l , ir„ . y"ir • ' .{R1 .,,,, - 187300— Y, ,.;'.P 4 � ', 5 -.,_ .i `'f• 4, \ 2 , . 1. w �. f,. G871.50— '1--` 4 I, it , w . lc . , \ 14 Pei r1 [&.Yr P.li = .04446. • t+ je- ;,4, \ �w eM a. g • i s a ci CD' i t �+l* 08f000– W a I p 0 St M os, 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments Page Number s ii- v Distance to Vegetation #44 ;, Q Baseline Stations 41-0.•Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CL_t 4 w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet i j q I Co ' O 4 r. yr o y` 1 4414. y 71 Y • nr 9 ;^4 •1 , if, i , ,, i a686850— . -� 1 4 CL F ' e �°' .. ti ...S.% k a ♦- '4',.:c't1 C* 'y 'A .4 Vi I, , 541, . '. 't 4' 4 c . 4.' . ' . '� `, 686700— *It t ;r.4. `A }rA t^ 1 yt ♦ y� » c" ! „In F - Ayy ..0,. -.14•,.. . '/ i -.)':74-....,he - ..,. , t J ♦ ' o A t CO CV CV Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number T, ''4" Distance to Vegetation #45 U H Baseline Stations 1-0"Distance to Mean High Water m2003 Baseline 0 25 50 W - — -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet i "`ip �1 T'{ 9 4,'r." yy ti ti I lit M- • rb ije•, 1,'" 686250- t"yt # J Y aaYY�' x 1 a g o11.1 U 4 1 ! . M 2 Ili. Legend: A FDEP Monuments Page Number t H Distance to Vegetation #46 m 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Mean High Water d 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CE31 W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet , _.... .......... Oa 6* f •• -'rz',..- ''' L 'c,i ' .... , .. .. . . ,, . :. ..., ..1. . . 4 itio-a.,' ': . ' , 1.• ,, :4‘,.,I •:: •::•.# ,:ii0 ...'' i--1;0, r, . - . ,,.. ....,. , . s s L "rik *i s * , '''1 - ....., , 4 . s . .. A #,Y;t*:*''',4 ..,'; l':%s'i '•i 2.A ' - '' ' s i Sot. 'It- ' - °' . .1.:',,,Itet,' '., -• %' .' ,._ ' 4. . ....,4A.,... ',40,4 it t,"",, ..c, CTs'''•,,i4,, ' ,,,,A . 1 sl*. .1kti ..r 4? I –685800 , ir .* . bf3r...;800—' ' , . .,' .., - :: ' ..-,,,,, -4t, , I e . , „R-42 , -(-•."' -er.'',..i-, . , . 1 0 le•0 I . .: ‘ .... ''• , *0 "' . , *0"*. •• ' r " • -..,,t,• , ,,::: ' a".':fe.::4".',0.4,,' •'''!'"47 :;' : 7 E I •-,C-1*'4 ..' 1...°12,. .,'; .tr' -*; n ,r, _..J .:(1• * ''' 14 ' w i • , ; , ,4:.,• .,111411 ,77 ' '. t‘,,-,..,_'• -rt. ar.,,,,r- , co.. ..,, . .. ,, ......, _ 0: co 41 .' .. '.eo ' . . ..,1•-; co o Legend: ‘•E Page Number FDEP Monuments Distance to Vegetation z #47 0 - () Baseline Stations 4-0.Distance to Mean High Water gi '1 e- 2003 Baseline tl 0 25 50 CB! w _ _ _April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o „ , ,,, „4,, , :. „,400, , .. 6a 1 . ,,.., , . 7 K. ... 1r it " , r ,,,,:-..,,,t,44.4*--,,::: ° 00 4.' ' .''' ,''''' - !. 1:*..1,„..• '''''” i 'if. . . it,,r«• 1 4 ' W yk . *A r , e}, WI' ka f N?� y 4 'r " .Y ^ I� .b 1 * .1 A=» 1. 1 ,1 .1 1 J £ 1 \,4 4400 1 . 1 aL .iiirii000 ,,k \, t 1 . .. .: sem i .44 . , ,..4.... .... 1 c..„ I 4JjI, , . • I • t,3 ilk �' .* •o 1lit - „ . a: N a . Legend: Page Number tz 4;• FDEP Monuments Distance to Vegetation #48 U y Baseline Stations 4-0.Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CB! W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MIME Feet o C a 1 a --4t.:,`. 6H5200— I - X T` LL: I 1 #' ! J .aM'i''X °.dY I tk i,,, `'.int+ ,R I X ff 1 r a ,,,,,„;•-•.., *! j . ...-„ fs.. a ,, I -, •sem *!� .+C+ ' I 'II q,7, + i „,..i....".......4... Sy'S :' 685050— Ix t r 'ewff +Wr I •'Z ..•t x,47 *i,.* ..0 * 41„1,V."it 1 f '4** , • —684900 I ,, "N>� . ; , dix - '*-- 68a900— �..a I ' '`' ' ,, I -* 1 ',ead`s s„st":� �t+ 1 .� illi `i. tit f s IJ: n , dJ A t jcw� ^.f ' . I Co 5 ML. Y Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number o H Distance to Vegetation #49 9 0 Baseline Stations d ►Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CRI W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet �"j o I. .:,�` I w lf; ., � �. A' r to 00 • ' 684750— ` , ,f I'.. 4 I . i . - 'R-43 a� ... k f 1 / • 1�4 .'t. }J ~SIV I •* �` Is_J9. 684600— . Ar. . , ty+, k� , +�S!Pati.A 9r., � t I ' , " . —684450 +' I ' �`+ 684450— Afi fix I 1 'r'� ii o. Ma , • I # ia;gj'ry aF .,1Y1 'ice I wt i o a'' I t,`f,�° '„0„ �.�, ,v. , COM M 00 Legend: Page Number /, FDEP Monuments Distance to Vegetation #50 U Baseline Stations ►Distance to Mean High Water e 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 C13 Ls — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet c, I " col m w u, o .... _ ine. 684300– . I , , - -, ,., ;-• . '''. s t .?•''-'04; ‘' .; . I1 .1,,,,, •'vo ,. I i ... . iit:, ,%le: . d I t d4;1•4 1 14mi. • ' '-la ' ,,,. , ,e.. . '' ' 44...., ' '''' ,..,.. 1 .....°11 'c' 634150— . 1 Aro.: • '.:,'"I'' -Ar:','fp,' ' -0.- - .... - .' --.. ,.-,,, - A. ...,.. -....., . .r. ' I 1 s .;:k., r .7'''' • ,tlor— 1 ,.., ,;..... ,.• ,„ . ;., ' ..;•:• '',• , . - i '.».,1 —...--.. • /.. ,•I ,. 4 . I , , . .., ... . • . , . I . . •. 1.4,-s,....it ...v.e.:..1., –684000 ',... I 684i.)00– „, `,.. d 1 co *”. • O 1 74 .;t :;:riS -r.,,-,,..c lot:*:• tu '"' . -0,1'0....ig. id", -_,.... i,:1,0#4', fi''- • ::,:, I ' ...^0.,,c,,t40,4'r- , '', ".•..'"' ...' A. z o .-‘'`. '4,-...•...."... ' - .1k,,t. 4* . *,03 3. - V: 4. .0 . ,.., Legend: Page Number '1' ZeL, FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line 77; #51 yi (i) Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation e- 2003 Baseline 4-0-Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C131 L.„ - - -April 2013 Mean High Water co 1.111.1. Feet i : ' I ,,, � , - '� w 71 % ,.s )f r,: • 0 + ';t- . ` 683850- r`; I '"‘e" 4 om` S. • j R-44 1 r7_ 11�� f 6837 y, I4~ .41 A ` L a i 683550- I 9e . lit O.. m r .... ,. y ye/'" a E CL O ati 'S}"m l � Aid II(+t '''',71.k414? wy w.0 'y g� . TD :46.11V1.7r.y•s .,t i AL .. , COLegend: G FDEP Monuments2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number 773 #52 Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline .4--0*Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CE! c - — —April 2013 Mean High Water INE Feet 1 ,r R o r l f i . rts 4 1j A6� O <- r , : 14 a +i ,4a ,, y 'tib '- Irry� r ,y ` > '` 4 I ..�,- $ -! 5 1 4. i , ,..., ,-,,_ , . . t .....„.: . ,,,, . . ,1 ; pa+oo ,4,I oil . I • ` sr y, '.' ` 683250— 1 I # 5 .1 r "O, a 4w / I, •' 1• , \'' I :rr., , .1 ✓r ► it,,.r V' i. r. 17 d ,� 1 A. 3 I4.M1 " ' O x 4. 11 .x ; �• Naple (Will J • , w i t 1 -ki. , r 11 Z13 I co FO ,w , rd rw+ +# r t, i 31. 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page#Number53 0Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CK1 w` — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet LJ o 1 _ ro' r. w 1 '+ .8295.0 I ♦ f l''' _ I 4,,• ;;fir, `°,-''" ry , . .. . ,# ' ':',., .a• `%.'a I $ _ 4. t , ',,� , . .."s : t ,a •v le +mow OJ 1......-......,--',—, ' ''' 1 .` ' ':� a, i,++ ss2soo- ►fp ."0* ', ,r . 1'�t a '' I ,"( 0 i '. '..'":..,,-,:‘, -,..',1/0 '.;. tr " 1j. . � �, i I " -�, 4'c R-45 ,' t ;; <,w. „ � ,. t .h., *° ? d 1 1 m W f , `*r ) U ` 4 M La 7 mo A.y 'dal a �,My;r U 1 .f''4♦' '1' tr& 4t. / 1[7 , 2 Legend: E A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number 75 #54 d 0 Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline /--�Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 2003 w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water IIMIFeet o .17:. )4.'1 4 ,Y• • .4 --r, .' .+ I is a Ir c * 682500 . � . • , , I w I 0 M+" I r. +� ; 1 '•,,,1a says _ ft }0 .0 R rt til 4. *it ,: Z *44, 4 401011, 1 _ :, I ,AMY ^4 ,i`, • •i -'^ i • • OY — .. • � ilt ' vie 1 �e* t='-ice• ar .'♦T ' _.° ' 1 TE %, s+ .'( vR ♦ rte' C� i 2'�M 44'x)`r `j*. • 4 r 1t141,:...--, l l I. ha 'r. ,.& ,*4 tib,,, _ 1 i w ,441.,441. •. „,•."i6 41 i. ? e i K. �j • -. U .� N, Japt. 1 I R+00t, co i"" • 0 �, 1 w1 .sem[ A. cq Legend: 11 %.\ FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #55 U ;, C) Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CRI Lu - - -April 2013 Mean High Water INE Feet L•' o I 00 -, 7, 1 0:424' '"d; ;' wat, „J• I •*'k�. 'ic"' .. I x; I , I r r t� t, 4, 4. • I .. s . I i ' ,irl oil? I 07+00 y;T 1 \ •J 1 1 I Sea House 1 I �• 681900- I' ti *'fit,! r• • I /'; 8+00It e•d „i 0 I I 1 liok...iorm., ' ' ,' 681750- u, -. 0 1 sat }� Y' 4i. ,';‘1:,.1 ‘,41;w , I r ..• ' ' co L. Legend: ▪ A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number z• #56 0 Baseline Stations 4-00.Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline 4-00.Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C�i w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water o MEM Feet 'l n' -411, 1 >. Le Parc I wa ..to-hos I .. 0 '# ,,,,fir ' v ;n I s ti a e i. M 1 t I Y I 4 :;:rP r0` ` . ,+ r`' . ,. r,.r s t. `„ r �� Y, �r R I' f 3x a 4, 1 .�1 ' t 1111%: 681450— I *4., 10 ,,,,,, , ,4, iiiiti. ::,,, . `411 i 1 I Sr ► r. 74} _ t o ..FMS #..„,e y ,�` w, -+SFT"`, �s Y� i . �1 Is Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page#Number57 , ® Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CB w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o ♦r dt O A# rr Iu ' -iv' :-: g'tr# * - „i: , , i 40" jtiff f ^Fg P'n 3 '0 " rr T" ' .01:''. '14 , ' ,..e.e . lis, 774,6 ' ,, , , 1:0P-1;--:',400:4:. - ,:-..--;.404:64/4"e- . 74 . .:1 . :* 10 0 1 \ .,r 05+00 681000— '.,, w, w O µ ,4 al el., v I E t 4 m o r 4 4 '. ,'7+00 t- 0 0 0ul co F c' M co 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number t, #58 y, ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation ,4•=11., d 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C � w - - -April 2013 Mean High WaterMil Feet l o 4 1 w m 1 It ,Y N 0 41 ., ::,' "At Iliksi I , 8+00 yaj w „t 1'a ! F Y ;P 0 �` IrliV110.L r • : ' 11P 9+00 F O ,.- a 24 R-47 6.4' ,-- ,-, ` 4- / k ai-- 680550- 4 r�1} R t - -.4 1 /4;,,, r '' ,• •. , 1#00 i*1 J'U co 0. U CO . Legend: • A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number 3 #59 ;, 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C�i W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet l o 0117 'If 4 , _ w `•. : ile . v.': a '*r„3,4''''*'.did .g1'.i' '''''':. „/ a. - _ ! t pi i 4' r/lr « 411",17f- f- .111 .. '1, d� .0 i ', ' Encla • 1 b ✓ ' .474'f.4, i .S e. .gip >M`. "'' •C :4,-, �"3+a4 A „ R' 010 . . rrs1 1 " a.041:3('ary�1 a ,. . - icy' r , 'xM, �.e., ' , 4 ?� ' p1 "14, . ' 4,4 J 4 y, • .��• ' Y y4." W 1 / Sa iii uLw.x'b ` �' W t C' � .. - :4. )41. ,,.:0, , .4 .ar t rt D ASM`- 0j-64€ >" ro o y U + 7 m J ,sl` 6. i, 6 ,016..6- 4 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #60 0 Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation � d 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MMIN Feet ' ? o r ;, E �' . 1' r a �,o r 1 s "y,w O. 6 s. . *•s ro" ,r. -7+00 .,' : 4,-, . 'r • i .:e - * --4 ice' ss ...if, ,l n 'r'.. e«.1 r4 f 679800- . R. f tr.„ 8+00 ! l f' oiwat 4- 101 iii .4 9+00 O } 30' R-48 679659 r',,J n d m ,c.„-t, UIt1+00 w 4 � : 1,� o in v • ',4k co Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number 17 #61 d C) Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CI31 W- — —April 2013 Mean High Water. Feet a a 0:i'Vis'' t }r ► 7r w j o Y +� �+� " 679500– or'', - „„.7:4'6 IA/ 446-v,.."..." f�: ko q * lir-Ot f9 :b.Ao, ,.:444.i...iitle. ti„ . 0 ,.1-- ii . ' -• ' fill qm r 3+00 IS rt r ANOVIIK t ^J j:. 4+00 fid e'ff le 679200– w �. at „(,,, 4 r.x s 5+00 D r ti E ,r ci v srr, r.' ; U o k' O U ¢� , v, 2 Legend: 92 A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #62 V,, ® Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 44-0-Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CI3 w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet I t 1 , CI.) c". Co k „ - _ ca ca f 0 fT iy� 6+00 et.; r' 6 a.1 Fli ' . a Park PI',, 1 a ' a l r4k - fq r Y . y{ Y . i' F hi , roi 4 ' . ::',.1..1*: '. ' 4,6, 1 n T R f p': *+ "i/ Ix r'1,^"+ h 'f, . yiroi r ` *p r x A '1, 4` Iw 1 b aa22 , ' ifttio&., , , +, ilk *"` '9+00' L' I t:: f . , a . ;b t, , Via. E iy '� 4 ca o 'i .''Vit, • .�, ... ' • K v,�. I � 10*00te01y Legend: FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page #Number773 63 ', 0 Baseline Stations 4—♦Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C131 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 0 11Q*o©+ , a„ ,. Irl`,;, . ;, • -. . " m r "",►, g` 678600- 3: A! ,-, tj G3-49 ` ,> -,' w. t0. q ' .b ir f i 4. r ' „, 678450– r#' rte. : 0,. *'t '27:40,6*t ► f; t '-,;,. f-' $140t. , i .fi '41'''' x 00— 3+00 w ��'Yv� a' Ox} ,.' x E w'. m ��♦ -" it w . d a I. .44 } b o U r s' ' •' 'i "pry'''..+ el m j Legend: 72 A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number #64 y 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation . m 2003 Baseline ♦—►Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CBI Lf., - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o 1 4.N 0-' , p :• 4+00 .0 4 � r ' '-- r The Reg'ef ' -iv , •k '� F. a�`-...r- ire•, 'r .. • . ., eft- ..' fik 711 44 44*':' ,, , ote.loit: • 1 *4j' P . , .,Ti. 711r 678000- .44 6+00 O 7+00 0 677850- m ^•;-;:::•11....e x iu S` a*` � 1 Hw . t T> 0,J, 1♦orwo �. ." 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 2004 Erosion Control Line Page Number 11 d 0 Baseline Stations 1995 Erosion Control Line #65 2003 Baseline H Distance to Vegetation 0 25 50 CBI L44 — —April 2013 Mean High Water H Distance to Mean High Water Feet - V I ., _ . k'1 1 _ . .. . _.. . _ i LI1 4.,...:2;..._ _. ,. 4, - . c le 11. • -4'' 2* '* -, canal f4 a 's Ik t9 — _ ` 0,A ,r, 4 .f.' 7' -r . I �1 Y 1. f.. 1M,, w - I 4\002;illfh 7. . › - •6775 . IT . rbc.. y,- I I ��111 �� at q Iop . r 1 I ,- 1 '' ' ' • ** %(t,,,, p s 1 111 775 m 2 Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number t #66 ,- 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation CBI H 2003 Baseline Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cf[ w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water MEM Feet L,rj o ,Ma Th * to f,�...4,. 4 1,1-',,,?.;:st:'41,„.:A,14,4•1 , . I ' 1°4 .: 4a `-' 677250– I , f I .- s• r Qtl 90 ,4jt„R •- *** I • •�« y 4, I .* , I r — �!, of v,tN'". ir 0'11'.CC r, w 677100- b...f 1 k I ill .41 . 1 eye . ipt, " 9F ,, *�, -Ir. � ie.kr ,"Az.. 2 1 tr. � I ✓r 676950– D m •s J W N o 0. LO U 6 6+0c c A i 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #67 d 0 Baseline Stations 4-0'Distance to Vegetation `E,- 2003 Baseline x--11 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 a w - — —April 2013 Mean High Water l Feet –1 lit o - 1 6+0q, 1 I0 co W co CO I `" 0 0 I I 7+00 . 1 0 676800- 1 IIII relkjillik. . Gatrgillik groitiareolmi. 1 .* o . I F ,' w. I P' I s+oo 1 ._ ° 1 1 Jam:' 1 44 no' I o lsf a o 676500- II I ;p U 'a 03 • 1 C0 1 1 2 Legend: .4 FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #68 `—' ® Baseline Stations 4---0.Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 PA w - — -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet A ' 4 I ` _ ik I OOP I l T� I >+oo I w i'' 7r 40S I - 'f i I I 1 1 I V u 1 Y 1 . ! "� �, 1 . . 1 1 • " - i w I e :,.,..,4.,. ._.. ,.., .. , 4 :* 2 f. Jw 1 r , 4 +»wa. % 0.4 ,• , 4 Zii 1 }) X`t At o � .* 4' 2 Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #69 N 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High WaterI. 0 25 50 CBI W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water o 11.1 Feet s I4 • `.e , ' \- *_ y * o ,„ * w --:-c„*..,,,:t.:41,-,4„LiinAt,f' 7_ - - 0 ; 1 • xA4 riii 41,, , i . - �a, \-. 6759'00 «t f" "w I 3* s4 ,. i . r{; :� . 1 ° I ...c.'", " .i ,00 ri x 'fir., sf �� , 1 67 ,..; -1 1 1 r -. -!,. jik , - 4 1 , 1 I 1 05+00 y �« v.,y x 1 d` a 1 d m U w g1 o 675600— x ) M PoI f: 1 ro 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #70 y 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 11 e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 ®" , w` — — —April 2013 Mean High Water IMEM Feet 1W i 1w CO 03 1 6+00 0 -- 46r 0 II \411 1 .,, ,, — .. lilt— 1 .. 1 Lf ri '0 it UkaM " - •vo. 7+0, 1 ° . Ilk1 1 ', ,i , :\ I .... .46,47 4. P. 1 T ° 1 'e.a. I y, I1+01 -. J U w '5L3 I co 2 Legend: 2- A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #71 ;, Q Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 11 e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C�1 w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet ,. I r' ,, ,*.'''4' i i •2+00 I ,O- _ * ..- +t, , I . 1 441*Plialit - ...-,, 4 4.1e1 "ri 1 3+00 675000- 1 0 1 I► mu I I. r. . 1 1 % . WilA .. ,,,w, *` law wk . IA se, I p ; VIII; . ♦ a 0- 1+ I. 1 i_ 1 % '* tip.. • It "r I O ' '4 ,11110k--A I I- �co•Ii- 4N(llt(i ;II IMt . wat r I �- 7f r w e E ., I uk { ar i J i a U _ x M . ro �..r�:: 1 • its Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number t #72 ;, ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation �-�r 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water112. 0 25 50 CBI w - — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet u , w allivAillik oar 00 I o 6+00 I 0 4MAN i• 4011.0, 0.01 I 00e. �1lit1� �F�vim, y." -�r r� \ - I Ztv r1- . ' LI IP ____. ...-;›,..-7,...,,,...-,„.400410,1 . •01880 I44:4...., - .,m I 7+00 •I 11 1 I ��II 1 I R , 674550- I I ..O"fes -. 1 I se y I ` 1 \. 4 4' .- irr I 1 g 1 .4t :', .;r4# CI 1 2 o .1;4. m 2 Legend: FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #73 , ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C13 1 w April 2013 Mean High Water Feet j 1 o I 11Iplire- m , .0— , itt tkI I R-53 674 '- Y~' fr. 1 `' 1 0 YY 0 - ,`` A I I 1 �ro OM , r A. .;A.4 I , QO 6 • I " ° ' , •'1a' rte mom ,,r _ It h - to. f i "' '" T i nl 1( 1 '` * t 4 6 4 411 lel s o . $ r . .-. U'a ,y' a . 'i x I • .� ,►n ED . . a k.° ) .. +. la . __._ s ...m Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 11 #74 d 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 w` — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet ' � ' 0 tS , ''S •tj ' ". 1 .,, * , A O r + 1 fi� _ 673800— C " I ,, I , 1 - ,#101-4O I 74 p k s t 1 '`ti Soft:ern Clippe s 01, �. 1 o •0 TA N.1/ ',..1,;" .*,'" ,, , , Irs �, .,o +o I 4 .i .16 1 I 1 . ac 8+00 1 o w Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number z #75 H ;, ® Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cit W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 11 o r, t i .... ,,,,,, 4011' 4 4r • 3- ', 00 ■/ .# . ..o-, . 1 At 4P • 1 P4 a I . N I ' FINN'.' I 4, y n e, G 1 I apr. s k. I 0 1+00,ft I' a 673050– e l co I r doe ' . INt w .441 ' 2+00 7p I b '14 r0 rt '"'� N 01 OCD or, r^, �/ r 1 ".rre/M ° 2 Legend: d A FDEP Monuments - 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 33 33 #76 . ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation ri /'2003 Baseline 4— Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CK� w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet i 1 Ilk W °' ' .1 .. }4� 011t Nu ,•4,,,,, .. of --, _. OK '3+00 r 014 1 •rr .will le" r n . I VP r 4+00 - 4 ; ' ° 4 .... .„ ..1 ,..:., .. .; ,4. ,,, . , 1 , .. -,A r , .� .r.- ; lam,ate►fi .'4 WI tii 7 . a „ .1 #,. t p44 > ♦ tis» _ ti AO- ' R , , . ,--. 67 26 a, fa 401iiiii* E v- `„: .ala , . , r W 6 . rt U Fo Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number zil #77 y, ® Baseline Stations 411---►Distance to Vegetation rr e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water es;, 0 25 50 C w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet jj,�jj l Air lilt <1, °I. n 0"' 4*.700 w4. �Y r x Y ..# ti n . * z T r ,,. .L t fIt '� ' ve.+ ': ' i iii s i• ,,ems lir',iw>y i `0: ,10 .k w 1 N., ,yn&t Rgis wr ,,; ailliiiillial It ,i i b * 4 • ' f m W i '" - r70101'" �. o4 m Legend: 72 A FDEP Monuments Page Number o ��Distance to Vegetation #78 dQ Baseline Stations ��Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baselinetl 0 25 50 0131 w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet Lj 63 Iv. N� kki I4 I ..,n 1 . rw., 14, -4 F7OME•01/1•••••••• t . k., .rte . I w<Plli i'n'r 4k � I # w k^ yy� I . k•,� iI Q Y1'0- -1 a _._ 1 e IM'k 4' tr st a� .,�. g+� I a IS ' Ik .' ? '4 I ` F 671550- 1 %1 •t#40- III .:,' ..' 1, �"WW.. I t " "r r«r I 4.1Jr ';,k" T c' G r , Naples I .. f s ci. I .. �` ' 6, I I 0. I r w I .,f,�` E5 I rx_ O —p t O U I #X 8.6i L. Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number H Distance to Vegetation #79 ,, ® Baseline Stations 4-0.Distance to Mean High Water r�ri '' 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 C1",j 1 LU '' — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet 4 W111111 r o . 1 I i . , r Ala/I Ai. 414i ' I 144i, !/ . - aw_m_grir. , ..: ,....,,,. :1--, 114 4 I "y {yam iwr' 0011111101.1110111 \s,,,447,41..„44. ,. r „44. , �gy ., r :I . P ,k �x a I 000. . Nti . , 3 ;or I , , „, . , T ..� � "a ,4' s I , , . 0 pe I W ... . "`e,"" , er . . 28 4'.. '• '� ,,. , ` i Cir 09. t , o$ cN Legend:, A FDEP Monuments Page Number H Distance to Vegetation #80 N 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Mean High Water r 7� 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CI W — —- April 2013 Mean High Water 1111.11.1 Feet j j{ o 6., r iikA. t 1, 7 11111111 . tral • R., 44 err — r v. 4. } ",i. w'3 4y . y .41, y ..4 y.alai' i n w...... 1+r.. i 1 to•-. i all It r 1 r 11114K`rlir 1 Jr IP' -1 it +r ib. 30.40 v ! r ' V ... _ Yf"'`: „fit r r m +�r M1 r 4 71 Sa m cv Legend: A FDEP Monuments Page Number T3 4- �Distance to Vegetation #81 0 Baseline Stations 4-10.Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CBS w` - — -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet B M�/ +_ Nay oa t7r ,c1; a �.7 *; max., of J .. e. A ...-,-.: i ilktio,..., , , . 46...110.- N. t X 4: % I . Ji. The =h6TE-1rW b. a .:1111111 _ '1 6 -. M .1, J. 0 %ir "' T-57 . 1 , t - ..r i , N .., :..� • -i*- yrs m �a�¢ - . s vti ' �� o wt"� ' r gyp.•-�' • ,0 ° 0 B. 0 411Y o ..4; hOMf W 1' m ' ., • . ..''"s 1 .*. Legend: Page Number d FDEP Monuments Distance to Vegetation #82 b U 1C) Baseline Stations Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 Fel w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet ,., a ;;.4 IlkJ,, ' Ii. c ` ill" sill x..,11 i p *i'4 .' At y w +`"A j}' ' 411k alr sl w •K r3/41% ,'' • 670200— M •4 / . ".* ' '• ,, • 440 ,w+ i w1:4 M. tb 7. P'11 k �„ w J''p ��7 L. ! y ' � i1 tt "' �, rii1At yll Ps 1111 «. � 4 .r 4'4". 14'4," r it t"‘„, "4 \ '4p •,,. Neve 4 w t" 4_ *.42°1. 66990. c kncq coo 012 Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number a Distance to Vegetation #83 v Q Baseline Stations 11-10.Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 504 0,4,t, W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet --1 1' ► �,.� I s - rx.� (4 ' CO CO 10 • �+rrw�' ,r' C N dr- -669750 0 a _ r ....„.„.4 , s r 1 014. 4 1 L • O .: \ ,-:;',Fr W.1) ot LI,Lr rr,2 r-v-i-) (Unn o 0 T 4 f U w o D - •r4 i of 1....... 2 Legend: 4` FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page#Number11 84 Y, ® Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 4--00.Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CR 5 Lt — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet ( j+{ co \ ., A . Ls litt +, 1116 k A e- , b. p 1 ' W 'i N. oho Ir 0 , • rf i q,/fir,,,, 0'). carni chi b ik , v t „, o I x'liii:' -- ',., I p ' ' I x t, m a. I U \ \ C `m_ 1,\\"''4444 :\ f< ib ro up Legend: FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #85 , 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline 4-0'Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C13 1 1 w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet N \ w 1 • 0 \ ?- {C —h-e- (%-ha E{r`R U Oris . ?1-(c s \ ikkx ,, 11 t 1 1444. " � 1 • 1 4. 1 _ i ; 1 668850 1 1 4'-r 1 1 r 1 \fir 11 *7/*t 44, , \ 7- i, 14 a 1 'G( 4 1 � , Ali 4 1r 4trl,..:* . 1 70j 1 airy T3 a co a . J 1 12 1 t U gill Legend: 92 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #86 9- ® Baseline Stations H Distance to vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cj_j�4 W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water i; Feet \ \'---' yr ye 1 ..`.. e'''' V '.. I, v . \ . -,1.6,44: , . ' '''IN ' ' e .„., - .$.,, , ,‘ . , ,, . ri i lk 4''''.-°4 10 , I _ \ s. \ 1 ,, - - -6685 s tr .4"4"-• , ' 1P4, — — •‘ t:NSANI \ y.�w iY \ ad.. g `y A.y \ .. \ ••••. ;•.. \\ _9��IM J� k+ \ '7*. _ \ _ .- \ \ � , "O • • 6 +IP w \ U \ E II 2 Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #87 d ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline 4-00 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 fi OP.,4 E — — —April 2013 Mean High Water III Feet --' o \ ,• Via. ' \ ".40t\ t t (_rr L ,a. \ \4\ \ .. . It - ... 1. w 44 \\ 0,4 . 4 �' \ .1.. K. \ O d '...g»y�T�il. F \ '°.,. C �[ 9 , �r< \ 1 \ . M M \ ' • `�' \ . . VO P (, a w \ Legend: •d Page Number A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line 1 #J88 d C Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet ' j 4. :•.74* ��PICTOillgSC e 1 1 1 _ ,.. ,.. 7 .001••••••goso................. . . Akr.,.. ,- ' " * .- #r _ R-59 fir" ` ,}. , 9Ys. 41.• .* 1 •'3 1 --• .*f 1,+11 1 _ 0. +' " .. 1 I. + " 1 :" 1 `° f f -41,-' ‘ 1 ' 1 1 1=;,•e 1 -r :� -ach Prot& •w 1 c. 71:00 1 0 1 , -.:1er ilt,*‘ • 1 , O ..`' - """`"`. Y . I - ,,,,• 'Iltiii,N ' E ,,.:. 4: 2 Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #89 N 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cj 1�l ` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet \ � r' 667350 r__F.: Taur :::z,...iw6.1'.::;-;itr'k' .., 771.-; 7 ''''' 4 l' \ 110444,4,11-'1r'11.`, 7 `'.. 4 ,, ). doi:),8, ....s.....7-4'. \ - �' �" \ Y r \ ,, ! } \ t } \ -"' + IC`. �',io I \ t \ $ \,...4.0.' _ ,40,_ ,. \ 01—t r F \ 4. \ Os ' „,,,, _._ $4,.. • q- ‘,.. ,... , 1 Xr, It. 1 . 4 i ti !Dili 1 . 4 )11killbc.. .1.70-,.%),*"ii '4,01sta,46-, , I i ,A '{"� a,r Jur ee. . ,...., 667050 •454 \ 4 i \ 4 \ a twR d \m V 0C U w ° \ M< m s ..rt m 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #90 , ® Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation it,gt..2i , 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 " W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet + � - jou., • 14 666900— 1 .. 1 .. 1 , 1 `4 ,, 4. 1 ° '' ......-•1'1'"` .ter. Iia , x x 1 ° 1 \; . : l 41, 1 "r •"",.., '" ' R-60 ,, ,. fwd ._ �j� 4 �µr�'�{x � T N• J r �. � V y« 1 " to t R 1 _- ° ti \I\ le d 1 - I ". w 1 ,AA Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #91 ;, 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 (' UJ — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet A o I 0 4. ;/ 1 •—• 1", 4444A: .> • 1moil 1 I � •s« ` v is, "r 1 � hA ri ��ril f-l�rsn , • A 1 e 1 1 1 • I 1 ?-rr * 6663,.` 1 ` v 1 - , 1 „, . 1 . 1 r "ter„, w. ilk1 . , ,,e.....4'...:Ptt.46. ' I . 4 ',if *4,10. 4 1s a. . 1 t .» 1 .,At niti 40:Tav I 1in '051 0 -1r . i 15 11 ., " • `F4 .. -' Legend:, A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 75 #92 U Baseline Stations /---►Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C�� U, — ' ' —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet j� a �4 1 : 1 .,.1/411 *o� t, u. .. CF' s A a 1 „ ” - , 1 v ^ani "- •4 Y d 'may{�, I% 1 lit v� •. '. +. 1 .* } 1I. 1 ^J-rrn.. R•` 1 0 ,• sNopi..� 44 • 1I - - 1. ' ,, i441-,.\ 4tfit Ahodi 0,, 4 1 1 !-r 1 4144 I , C u� 1 O , - 1 665700_ 1In . . C x Li, 1 , ° ,- o . .,), , U 1 7 M 0 Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #93 N13 Q Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 00 25 50 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water FeetIP 11111k\ R-4 I \ . it, kl):: la 1 ,, \ _ .� ► : „S. , .1/4 i I l't 1 : 'te \ \1\1: *I Ir „, • F' 1. \ •.l "rt fre 1 r: , 4 1 0 e. `r 6 - y-w T Nile- . 1 ra 4 r,..Y 1 ' 4 4 x! \ t I ; 2, Jo 1 0r s 1 i -, :, ' , 1 ; 1 -N 4 Ilk 14 -W I , it,' * IA ✓ 1 # I M • 1 op 1 r f .1k. k 1 .W _ f £k '' F I 1 ••• "'•' ra+`o0 "III 665250-. 5. .. • m x 1 w Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number z #94 ;, 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 F �ilk ' W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet ° , c.D , iptc:, , I 1 4 1 . . 5+00 I t¢ 4 ' ` I , . i I '''` i '/M :,...:,,,,,,,,,),,, 1 ''" r „ _.1-11 T, '1: r,,, 665109 T r 11.4 it A1/4‘ .) i.k, ..., . , , 1 .., d'A li ''''? ' . , 1, '* ` 1 `'• A, V , 74-00' Parr' *,� I ` �►, . I Fes. I ' , , ' r (-,@[(.1,1c-,„,-, ,�- iix. E ..„ ..;. ., . 1 d r t.} r I ''', 1 s Sr�,� ur ' 1 1 .ter , 1 . ,, `". 1 .} i N o] Legend: dA FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #95 �, 0 Baseline Stations I Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline I Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water o Feet a X1-0 o 1 1 is fit 1.14.41‘wS1:14:141h3161‘1 '; ��' ',3N62f - Y y V'(1C= Imo' Il��l� 2 syP d a ' o :,W /,.: rMa- ,...� t tlb *. q r� `e Is` 1 * ; . . , yi-{-go � 4. P. , 1,4 g , r r coli.�_. •. y,� .. U � 0 'F ("tib'. w �1 m U ' f4.. y '' to G t 5(0 x ' s l'. t00� a Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #96 ;, 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation 2 11 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o I . „k' . ,, /:. .A.r GO I '4,4+0a,, vi' •�� . 4 s•moi'3` roc: 1 µr, 1 � 11 . :* ti- ry 1 ,, 1 1 i k,._.., rI 1 °� � ` - . 1 will 1,4 1 r 1 I a' 1 i 1. I4 4. 5 .,:. 0. , Ie y1,r wP7.-.4.ri x• 1IA I . . T1 i 1 'p '�` o uffit Sf.:ITl1(�.-, 14a 44 • 1 —. r r 1 - ��.. N a I - T ;''< ” 1 .•- „r ; .x 1 r f-CT f o 11 ... 'if " 2 Legend: 11 Li' A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number ,y-, 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation H d 2003 Baseline Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C � w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water #97 1 Feet I s o 1 ` .t. I I I \ i,P. .,4O,.,-,,-\-.. .:*._,. l'li ki 1 +., Al ' I - -_ , 1 \ / 6, 1 , 1 w 1 N. 4 ; 1 > I �. k,. s A, `�' A 41 1 A Y N i h R-63I le .-...,,Pik , , 74 -.to y� • . « » I f 1iAllt 1 f 1 • r- I \,..10,111• ►1 1 U .,,,A610416) D 1 t Legend: 2 4 FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #98 -, ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water m 0 25 50gel W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet - I '1 illye . M,. Y 0 -.. 'k'Z "' c iir 1 '' k (vg p(- A 3ging.(fi C-eft 1 . ' m • r I 4 , � 4 ; 1 ,"` . , u" 'v I �__ .. .� 1 erg ', ., 44 ii4 II r+ 1 yi 40 t w . 1 q� J t .. 1 I .. y • ti 1 "'.` • '" "� yam► Xicr 1 s' 5+00 ` . O'y.. �#r ) 663150 t I ,:. , ± :. A� .yam.,., •-�? lery s.r , 7r STI{j • 1 ' . g 1 : - c4 t, a ..-.• • 4, h" It • I .y `m n -••••••L .'1 6+Q0 Y t • ii .+u' ,, , g Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #99 V, C) Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 pl`-4i w` — — —April 2013 Mean High Water _ Lil Feet r 4 o I . of ti 1 � r }:1 1 . , ,� r 1 "`Y., ..� +doY, -.e ,, d'` .'' t . - Y _ • w 1 I V I. O .6284 1 ' »'* I - 'f , * -'� 1 ., ,t)a. "‘4., 4- .(4,' ` ,. t • 1 ' •• .,,. 014}6W 31.4 l � I � . a » j c�662700— 1 ‘, 4 0 :''''" ". -1..r.' at/ E 1 ice. m 4 d m yy. W 1 '+ ii 1 », 4 Re r Legend: FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 2dH #100 0 Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation E 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Cl..r'{ � LU — — —April 2013 Mean High Water _ Feet o I !l Fit" !* t. .„s f:t 7,:.•. 6r4''.' 'r ..•''' .� e' 66?5504. I / / 1i, •1 t „ �. n, Y, ,1 I 00 �,,it`?vtf l3�',,' 1 p. l ' I -140, % •±,''' •,- :„.•• - ' — — \ 1 f�" a �, 1 1 ,, • .�.... 1 4+0© , 40 r 1 `;,7 7 "fir .,' o I .,y' 941'. ,, 4 I d ",Y ' 0 , a o 1 I .. s .1 Emilio", Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 11 #101 t ;, 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C1 W — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o o X.''' M Os ooh s1h- N'11 .. I • ri r :riri r .r � 1 N r ; i *it- t- - 1 .4..,..,, . , ,�. I „ . , .40e41/K I " T-65 ' . s, w Iir .1 -. ` .4' 6619150L 11 '�N. _.4. ... ' ..' P. , . .„ ,j.v r, ,, Icy• `�`. F !a 1 M.. .,, i I I a f SK M T LiI 2 Legend: 11 FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #102 V> 0 Baseline Stations - 10.Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 �R� W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water 1 Feet L1 o w y '''',;r:- `Fr.- x .1,._ ox 1 ' ,�,., 1, 0. 1s ,: ,„ ► g.: » .`,1, : Ai .• _ ora I .. ra .^� r �;• '.4104620 tet, , ` w. I♦ �. t. 1 /k f t µi i;')( R t.,� i� y. - p !9 = ,},'y etc , �-9 ,, it b. 1 Rrrf i k i, f,1500— 1 "1ktt 1 ;.. � It 1 of+��+ � 1 , . %,A., 5. ,. ' �..,__.,I 0:7. Jia �. 1 1 x it w I 1 14 _ I 4 Imo ip 4 . sArTur „„.,41,11;1, . �, �, .,40: • 'r. '-, oo .- I ;Ii"1." ' F ` ' '„ 6613501 Q ► s UJ n t, Ico �. C.) I " yak : o 2' Legend:, d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 15 #103 d ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 031 U-, — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o 4," -1 ., W4 , .1, ::4:-Am. , mi 1 '' Ir • ' ;, A. * -"'"'.-, it' ' .t. & '-',.L. 41/Z I0 ate $ R-6,6 l' . '''' 4111 '‘' '14,'''''' ,. 1 fi , , ._ 1 . 0 ; _4,, 1 1 146. ,,, 41. , 4,, i 1... , ,. , -4 4 1 ill e:rt: . . A Ao- F.,..-- ..,ter°d fJe4". ''.' .' •p 11: .w � �I'� 0,-.a 1 ' lA^ � Rvr"�s i 'ri n. * % • *r 1y \ 4! • * •,r, I . - .s ' _ 11111 D 00 404 x 1 2 U 1 w i, m p o I N U O 2 Legend: il T A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number t #104 �, 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation v. 2003 Baseline I Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Still W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o tO I 3+00 / 0 fir. 44 •k""'i ,:.-. ".a,, • ,`j rye -. i { 1 r I Rort 4 11110 ,F4 S B44• `i Ot 0 0 r�. y.t i p.. yw.. .i 1 ti► µerr '-�� tri, T «sAi 1 4 , 1 I r`",raa0 I 4; 1 ..� t f. Pit`s`+ . 1w A . t: 660•'a 1 ,a.r ,' a, t ,•� , ,411. 0 `me q N t' °,- I —' ,,,, ,,, *tit; i �y7, 0 i,60,8.0- t Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number z #105 ;, 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation ri 2003 Baseline 41-0'Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CBis - — -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet j,,t` _ 0.''l.'".. ' - ,r ark j4 ' I' 4, ,--.1...!:0' ..., . am, , , ,,„.„, 4. _ „„ ,,.. ... .. 4 ';`,114,201741„:1."'.;; � J„wfdM ,S. ,11 • r t l Ito 41 x := r w 44+" 70.1r, es , yK e 11 .. 4 1T .r+ 1 I.'"1 t , .1,, 041, ir . f/ d T V • `• iK 'I'• * &i r w /f lam' - , • " 041 , 4 - , ; 0 rill 4 11.,.:.\, I ..,,,.., , " , •,,,' , -. 'I,.,:.,:, .,I , • 1 ,,..„,.. rr ' •. , • e' 14 -E 1 - „..,•-. 3+00 k</t/iii m 7�,Ru. r o U f, m 2 Legend: 4, AFDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 106 U y ® Baseline Stations /---►Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50a ,-., W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet -t 19 o • ljr \-,,, .., ..7 t," „t -,R.;., 0,4‘ 7. ,,e,, , , , ,. �`. . AA C I., 71, L.. ♦ z- ...., •—a 0,,-10.::„.7-07,,,,fkr.3.0itir 1 ,,., :el i:.,...,0,. r.' , r /' ala''' • �I',y1,,._ . t �ti r • ,r te" l4 - i �� ,� r a • •J" ...II,' 44.1,41" 659850-a 1 0 -% 1, �s , w•` e.41, tI l '.Y 6+00 1 0 4 ‘,. .*' 'A ,-.. , ''', ' . .rt,.. ,;, .-.,..,:r., .,. _, , , . x . ,...._, ,, ,'3, ••• ' „u, -- ••'• ' dr `rte 1 :, ` � , •. r r ' r 4• ` f r r* + WVO {. ms's I C. �k a , f {`.,JY `'.ei". *.1 . msIyq $-: 1yydd + .I WyV� 1,41,.. • ,,,,,,,, ,..,..k,',41...,•,,t1,1!t ,. :40., co 2 Legend: 11 w i; FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 107 9 ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 4 'INI014 w` — — —April 2013 Mean High Water iiiMill Feet k 1 1¢^ �" ar .f, 't I$,yTw 8.1.0114,..," rR.68 w 0' s4 �'(�, a t ' �'". I3"b r _, V.41;• 14fr +' •Vtic ..... pry 1 .: r 4. ' . .r tits ,, a y4R+l 7 ilei ��P el I ' A'`L, , " • A. •ar.- ,l!- ,i ' 4,-,A e,,," •'!. 12 '!i: SYF • y ° f+f Vii,' ,'i "` . ,� � "gyp ��,/w l r M I Jr arMr^..,{kr' ! 4,1, � � �.� � . .1r.,,,01,„,.1.4,...,,:;: : ,40,;,.t.e 4, , (lit' %,r r h �R ,st i G • + : y " 0 we aI ... Ji.}' ... 4 f, LIJ w 1 ^fr,.. 17. ! 1/ • „w1r ,.4.r m rsl Legend: 0 4, FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 108 y ® Baseline Stations 41E-411,Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50L' w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet ,� o A' [ -0;4 h Nye kW 1 4. j,4, :;tit '., ;' ,-, _- ':• -- ',..'ll . , _lit _ . ..."_,_ ___ .:, 1 .4.,„,r J "4 - �. I • A 4 f', .fir : a If �, ♦ 58950- 1 l '' '6*00 �k J.Ca: I ---,4,)„ ,iiri.,-: , .;,,,,,, :,;40; 4 . 4Iiit: -;:/.t ��°� "t dk� e�''SA� 4 I , -* ter ' I e r \ 1 / � 1 Y 4 1 ,„ k ,fi< ;w' 1 1 T-69 4tIP . 46' w t , . i i J)k {y ' jr ski w m O O ,.Y k `1+i t n V< IQ1 p �) r .k-3 millegr F Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number -Ts #109 ;, 0 Baseline Stations .4---10.Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 Ito w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water 111. Feet o # w- : • 'r•:.,.., .' ..--. 1 Ri; 1 w 1 41, --- *65865. 1 •'f...,1"if.,. . kill= .• , 1r. kiimii L ,1:1!...i.e.\Ai ti;:,• . • '...ir-- ,..:... 'l; s'''' t .grie* ••, • A. le it ' 41111' 4 1 1 .C.:,..•/.. , ,.1,c,ow , tr.: 1. ,.........r, ?,'Opar,1:4,; ' V.F.„1 .4,.. 1 1 t .. .. .1 ,t, I .1.•„,,,..,, ,i1 ,01 .... - t „.. tI tm.r ,Adlle; 4,1' ' • i i''''' ...,44..........4....... . 4 . I' ' i'' • 1 1 e ir • • :,•• . . f'w`t7".•"' ' 658' • t a ' 1 i •twi.:. "#.,#44"ioa' _--. # . _. , ..tki'dar ''• '`,..41e' ' ' 1 '......., #1 7..4,# • .....N J . : . '1 • 1 # it.i. ,•; ,r i 9,'...' I. 4.. e * 4., 1 • .. .,,,,,s.„,,,te,. # *1 1 - ttt. 144.0 ,' 24 •••''. . e , I . ,.I - i If . • #* 6. '0 . i •• e . , 1 "... t,,,,.,..,. .010..: i. .;. . , .• •- „ 0.t , 1 e .01,A .. , .. tic •• i , . . ...... , , ,-L..... ., .. ,o, - ,.ati• '.. ,!„ "" ki , • ...g.. .i7,7:4.41:1 .4 .. ...,.; . . , , . „....rr.t. „..e.- 1 • _et:., .. 1.. i . i k 1 t ,..-..,,, e , 350- ..,,, .,,,. %. ,. . . i .... 1 , scr, Al, , ‘ 110, ' , _ ,_ i•-••/•. ,4+00 i ,:f,, , - • 1:. :. r -. *74' ,),"414; %e-- 4 L i,.-. 1 ''') ‘ ;-.4. ,,. ,; i , ...4 4.„ .....-. .--4. ..4 4 I.IF I ' , ,,. *' .'1 4' v" g • .. 1(..) 'I r.iiir , 15 i1 . •..' '46., Legend: 2 A FDEP Monuments —1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number t 0 Baseline Stations 11 —110.Distance to Vegetation #110 4-0'Distance to Mean High Water Sid i 2003 Baseline :12 1; — — —April 2013 Mean High Water 0 25 50 Feet c.D M —1. OFT 4, , ..4, s•e410 .. , ----,- ., ., ' — ,54,00 , I . - -0 . ,...... II\ _ - , , -•., ., . Or • • 1 ) ‘14%, ' 444.-11111-' 11111111,14..11 ' pl....imaddigliNit ill 141,•'MEP . 1. f , •. lip- • , ...-„. f . V 658200- .- _ ,„.. A f•*41 - S. P ' i „ * ' I.-•, -' '' ..ei,-6 .t . too'- .. , • • 1 ' • - .0',* A - * '- \ • --, 4 ... 4 .4 • .1 :,A,. _ 10 '•I..., . ,...•„, 1 . , , I * .. — ,i 1114e . .*. "-. .,) , fr- , • v I . .. . .., —,..* I 4 r• r . :0., - •-- . i ....,,,;,„ - .., e * irt %c50 ' '"`• - • 1 ' ' .`r" 14 4'• 7:00 %. -1,:a--, • ,...•1, - k- ' ..:, ' « •,: .... w .... • .'ii'N., 44.4 * 1..' , . s hi* *". .C.‘.. . Sr .-f , ...--.• ,...,,,,-. ., „es. •-cf. .e•" ,. -4N1 ' i‘l. 4 1 '''' IF'f' efe,4''''•"' 1 t•,- •• •,, ;,,,:. ',„2 ,,s ,„„ . - 4. ‘ ••. `-si—,it`1400: • -.:' -" :, • , 4,""'" •' '- 1 -;111°V. . • '• ,-.•or,47 'i,,,,,:, . •,,,,:,-, , , , , o ,.. - i•°4. 1 •,- ....:1.,..:.' 1:(->r"':',‘. -, ...,,,V. • I,.,,,'Nit,_,.,,ir ^';•,..tcai C.:. • NOS1 4 . ,..,;.:, ...i.J..-4,-- r..4... .., ' •,• '—oft4, ., _?./.,.. .-,.1,„. 't t ..,',.. - • , •IF ' -- " .., . . „1 .• ,. ,...:, .,f1R•170 II. ./, t •.%:,/ilb, : AP . , , "4.• • , :k'1,r.`' '...,.,'.*'''",'',:,"0,'*4,4I'.,;"t4;..1'§',.''.•744"'0t:,',4.,,.,„,., ‘,.#.. i :J•i,.4s,..%,e 1. -.. 4•4,t.- • ,.; , • '....."".:1 . _,. 1, .: , 1 ' 44 , ,,or:. \, g . 4 la ar ,7 ...." ..J Lu ..):.,:,,*ro:'At7- jilt'?.". • i., 7, 1 i674 0 1 f< 45* 0, ,N 2 Legend: 11 ‘.E Page Number A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line -V, ® Baseline Stations I---IP•Distance to Vegetation # 111 ,-- 2003 Baseline 41-10.Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 w - — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o 1 t ';J''y.44 r, 7^ ,✓' 1 I '"'',�' 00 }'` r i ',...,,,,c .4,, -'"# x"1`.1+ k ~`�'4t' a ' *41iL i '''''' " "Illik ' f '..8- .... Ili i 4i#6 ' -AP% 1 ' 1 t n. •:'''''f > ai i I. z I ;,.t„ 3+00 , .), ' • 1 .t 4 ,the. ,i'"`•' , 1114 1 • 1 r . • 4+00 = _ « �� I \II. — ' - '." Iliii. .. `,:k r' , 4„,14/, c I 4"lot 10: It ° t ', .." ' Ate ' fiti s )_ I -5 r� *VA I :le- A 6_ I 14•4:4f y1. * l r.) m A' y _ ,.sw o NP. O a 2 Legend: 11 d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number z # 112 d 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 �y u w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet " h 1111 ca . wr a w .r I ca f r ' ir:f • 'VI wj�� .7th......e., �} yer, It *Ille • ,'-'1',+ .I 1 '`oit 1 .fir I , , i 1 Ifi �h' Y �. +�" .i. ,' i57300— ,,. - I 7 's 1 '0.3i.,- 111/11" i 1 4 , .. .., , . ., . .„. to 7,, • I �� rye f Y rya A`S Y?MV'� +�'~{ `�9 '� `,,r. _ A' )d. k , -1,$57.J kali • 1 • I '4' It V li1/44. w 4� ' .(11/4 . 'fir I ky, }.'` 7' Y' 4, ' 44.. 1. ' t. U ` ,f % ., 1'°'"'''''....,`Jorts1* '.ri,.., 'r Legend: rl A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number T, #113 d ® Baseline Stations I Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CP t w` - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o >-I; +l0 w ' ,_,: ' txs "� r r• f I • `ivi�' . Y. 4 t. 1 ... 1► It. xr��a -.. --v : .. . 1 „. .3+0, 1; ., 11.-1:14 4, i .. it a r�y�y�+..4 t ��3 4e . .. I ,t.'� t ' tits . yt 4Sii . 'fes" ir 1 '40,7♦ •. ft „a; 1 ��+ ,�- .► MILV.` ►� • •700— t X/s*;It Z. "I" Al -firs * } I 01Ni f cr: - Y, �� • r * ' I , 1111 1 .� ti I -„,....f''''''-': - \'1 'e .4 c x , i •,...;71.-4, - _••S x.. ,:, Nu- -0 1 .650— g 1 `6+00 • LIJ P ry ay mil ct !,1.,,, `N"' ' - wl+Ipr�'y 4 , Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 0 # 114 d Q Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation e- 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 � w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o • , ' .4141 ''',.. 1 t.--..n -41.100---••-- ....„,...-- I * ^ Cr ,,,,... -'14.• .A, lit . ., ..,f. ... . .. 1 , . ) • •,.. '40f---• tkik. 1 #' i..•• " Not,,...r• ' . 4 •10,'',,,-(DC.P ' • .... .....' . . . I „ . / Till Ilk fq,...- 1 I. -,;r• le : • .4'1 • ,-• 4, ',IV ',nog, 4 .yo, , ,,,,,,•,.iv• -4,t;:a!' '`2" ; t'';''4.V64.ob- .i-, •,../. -....ic ...- , .040 • .. •4 il)".'4' . 4 ., e, •- ,4.1ei.,A , •'-''''''--;,*Y!04 t' „„,",;1/2';-- k,t, >rr ‘‘'''.,„ ....)4,. f „or;,,A • 1 , c' •*-- i 1 1., , \ ..!,„,., •0.".• 7 sit •2., .• ' •1. ' .7 i ... N R-7t2 %.'' :i,--=IMP ' • . ° ' i i"-::-.(KP ...zt; ts" ' •ii. '4' ". • =,-,t,A 1 k . . . -' ' , ;IV . ', • •/,,. • 1 4 4 , 71 ,,' • 'Z' 1 , . .. \ 1 ' cto of , ' „,,. , 4 ,i„. '4; , 4 .' 1 . , ..e,..... .44o6.. 614 , / 111 1 ...." 4,, ,•.... „, I" . • ,„ , „..ii• ,,e i„. *..iii.'i '' - •>:-.*--17••11 7 . - ....* 1 • ..•;J IF itilie. ..-.• 4- 1 ir • 0 t ,, . . s.56250- 01+00 . _ I._ 1 A• 4 • •• ,•;" ..` r..dor ,..", Cc, 1 1, ,e,it 1 - . ,,Olt . • 4° . ' .; '.,,,,„Zr•-*0 1 .r „,, - I *ft. ,, 4.iitteW0010.-, .., ..4 . .. . i - . • 4 +11; i,... .- , 1 ' , 4.,,?.. -, •,,' .. '':(4441, "„".'' , , • r , .. tr • ' I' 'g I '''' ' .--,-.4 .... • 1 •,,,,, s ,..i ''. 656100.." -I IP 1 / L 1 , k# 4 •• .- .t..• ,. •..j•••.•:.,„ ,...'•':','.'•,.,,,..3e- -ct I c , f< .- • 'AL 'It ... I , . Ili\ N N Legend: o Page Number A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line 7) # 11 5 9 ® Baseline Stations 41-0.Distance to Vegetation E- 2003 Baseline 11-1,'Distance to Mean High Water CD 0 25 50 Aiiii u, - - -April 2013 Mean High Water =MEN Feet a ,400i f 1 I . - ti... .,.. 1 -ti I. }" 1 655 0— ' a+oo 1 i "' . * ' '. 1 i 3 F 1 I1 A ,:: ;.•:.74.1111.:;-'%::„ :,,Ikt-,. ' „, ., .,,, -**1*.1:' ..'' ' 4 *T".4.:1-.: 1---:': ' '''.4:*58-:‘'410 1' 'i r t,n, r 1r: r v. 1 t' '' V P n"'A v p�-+� 4 I 1 ,„ Ai._ tt ,.,, , . -ox 1 cam. i ,, m 'M► r Y V. oi 2 Legend: FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 116 d ® Baseline Stations �#—�Distance to Vegetation U 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 w 1 w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o '''"7+00°i 1 :111N-111111rAr! I w M N a 1 . .'+',,a , ♦ ' t Y I 4t '-!'•°V.'.. ; a„L k r •.ba y Y t p .N rOe" r,ff ,f, 'r F „ 16%� .... 1, 7,..i',K.'''' .. ' . I �. .14 'qii , , I 655500- •A I i4 ti f', I r., I • • # 'L1 + r d a IrIIIIIIIIIIPllib. r,r . . •\ ,� 659 I a4 (o4. f + 4:'1 I /► '"c 1P-ft 1 ‘141' '',.r. „'''. 4. ' . »iit '..' • ,i•••:.:-• . '' ' . a I \ - :t ik " ...>. 1' \ iiiio.,.. - . ok 'fi, i , Olt 4,4 r 1 Ai . ,,.-'IV9 a 1 , W, r 0,t dI dwil w tii 1 P. A al 4, .,, a 4� .r U I r 4` to { .k „ Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 117 d 0 Baseline Stations II— Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C131 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water 111 Feet o Iiiii It • "*„., • • „ 06.0.8 ;fp 0 , .8, r .• > : •tx.o • I *r i. ti ,.... 1:111".;;;:::: '''''' -,...:- t s � 4+0i9, �� :r , i , , '1' ,- w Itior1 I4W. .4" q 1 7 r.-..- .. ,_. .0,1, . „ :40-44y., v , -,,,,,,,, -:::1., , t 7+00 ., -4 r I ` Fi a 1 � �- i 1° ae'er • , di -I•V r;-,I .a ' w w Ilk r s 0 ., 44 ' .. co 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 118 d 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation E. 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MEM Feet 0 • -r _ -.44.4.- - • ,..''' ' 1 IMIlklit No, i• \ "o 0,-A.1 • '. Vfl, 7 . A, , 8+00 • • / R-74 7: ( '717 -1"°.-.c, •• . . 50- 0 '. -poi, #. •,41(0. ).,)•° .•.- 9,...„,et# ir------..•. 1 1- ar \ .4,•••,• , , - --- r Y .: •rr ,.. • •:, ..;,$:1'• • , t' '..°. 4'..1.1• ':\ 1 , .Nmfliff -,j1 i 4 1 ' ' * 1 • it'll% - 0, b, -4),4,0,0"r•o. Ara• olP• ...1" - 1 k .0., - .. „: orii .1- , '.... T.47.4 ' '''' 4 44; • ' . ,. .• 1 I 1' A •.„4/(„4,C.' '''' , . L,„, 14 ;4,,, „ 1.. .,.. ,.., , , , l'0 '/'''' . ' 1 4'4' , 1 •4 % Ay , A . 2, ' 4. APer ,*•irt •5 - ,.tit ,..r.e.. • , .‹...., . „_ . ._ • 1 . ' •m,,,g r ---.6•••••,/*1.", J 111.-•-"', . . ' • , 1.•',„ • . ;it " kik.eV °a Ilillw '"*"°' 1 • -,Y. . -.• ,,..- ''''' , , ,.... -,...',ti., , .,• " ' oolits• - . 1 , f r:.4... .**47 o 0 t# • - / 1 •., •".;!.".- ''t.- ";'''rit'-„., ' S' ;" • ,,,, , .,* t 14 • e . '; ,,,,...e.,P;J' '7)`N c ' ' .CI,. • /'.4•440iir„4 2t0151; ..c. ---•,, . '1 Aitt-;'' . 'kit 4. ...tp / . Z•N' 1 • 44:1447, ",,,.•- ..,.. ..ele ''':::,,,er: ii -' 4 ''''j -iir's. h, . •.0-- 4,,*4,-.4.....4 ""..rjr4f!1' , ..,V&A. " ' -7.4 , . .tri .-.1'• ' a BS 1 -..‘°"'''." .. •. '. '47'. ...`1 ' '; '''..'4•"' ", . 1 1.,..t. - ' -.. . . ..-i ' ', 1 ••4• . •.:,` "sk.r- ' ,'f•-iL4'-.,,-4 .- -.,' ." -• - ‘,*0"t r,,,,,, A, '- N-.4 , " ° 1 .-4 ' . '...."‘o• . , ." .44-o0. •••:.• 4...,,,, ,:k 1 ' "t', '. .', ,":4• $4411:*"7.14: 0 ,„ j ? 1 .."F. ' . • ,... . . ..: . . ,ks -4'-" '•' •• ilk o IA. ....._ ir , -••• •A • , .. V" 4 1m, ....„ ...„ sit -V.I. - + • a, • inv, .. .,,r, ^ .... / ,. ,. 1, .4+00 /.1r° "r i# o,o2 po „,., •...".• ,t es " •'- ..0 .• , ,,,• .0..- /r. - ‘- V . ,,,.., *ot/ -a • \ - ' o„,.. o„• ..-#.• olik.- cof,.1 ,. .., .•••• .,,1 _,- / "•4 —,...4*--- "`"t; ...- • f'V 7,44..". - ,, 4,P Legend: '.2 Page Number A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line 7 -(4 (1) Baseline Stations 41—*Distance to Vegetation # 119 g• 2003 Baseline .41—*Distance to Mean High Water .• 0 25 50 kill c LU '''' April 2013 Mean High Water 111111 Feet co «fir ,Vre4I �♦ 1 , f r � V P. .-ti Y At; 11 III ,,, I 5+ ' vlV.4"" ..-,' "" It ;e .II) ', ` 1 4: -!•-r-- iT4f� "s...! 0 f Nifri` .4 ..10,-It 04.-ji,••, e ........., . I 4�L Wit. V s\ 1 Y 1 '� A�_1/+'awn". �" ' , ], wF 0101 . ,, , . . , _ ,... 1 '� * �„ tr .r. T „ fkr 1 ,/,, . . ,. ..„ f 1r . ,,,, I •rL , 75/ i .r h �, � , I �.,' , ".yin s *r 4 OIt @ .P„ ,,w • 4p ) y.:.h.I +tp .. Y Li ro Legend: 11 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number 4 # 120 y, 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation e 2003 Baseline 4-0.Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 111,4 w — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet • i :11 w. .r a ` 1 A I . ,*• 2+00'.' • 7: • r '- i.. !� cy t7 • 11 . :1;1 .:. %-: 4'11' ,`.. .. r 13+00 44r L . I t r- Y,L,-s.,,f * j f .4+Q�f a,.. Oji +` ,t pi y,. c x /' CC 4... +a No •Ai r, . ` r :f V,. { as E 9. _ . ...... .f�4 d s _ d` op 2 Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number # 121 L' ® Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation d 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 6,,,,F4,„ ?F W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MEMMI Feet ` •. o `� xo 10 t. 1 u • �'t in. 4rO1]^� 1 , ,,, ". ' .,,„..„ - 1. 11' 1 xh4, • • ;• « ti :: - • y r r .-7. a.... .,,,Ff .4,1 0 ;r1f+f/ r 653250- 1 'R-76 �� ,,?• / rte: r `.yIr; am ' A/ h-- % ` ,, 4 ' }C Wrx.• ors ' w i o Ota. -:. X Legend: 2 4' FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number tii #122 U Baseline Stations Distance to Vegetation 2003 Baseline 4-0'Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CR j Ls — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet j1'l o 1 ' .',� '�x r*l li t 1 J o l 1 '' a �is on the Gu r 1 ti i ,.. — +SII I •r 7:.'1".. :+- i. ' - ilk ��,.. + '- • it 1 ' C3+0 .IIti • y` C'``''{�f r.�� . . , it _ 1 ....4._ _ , . ,.. .. ._ . ill , . A I t 4+00 .. ,s q 1 lo ....,,r , „ 1 P' ,1 1 5+00 �� t v. .....- r .. r ,. f t- 1 ,` .. s as s � w 1 H Y ,, ;r,t�!; 4 I ` _ . co 2 Legend: A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number -73 # 123 o 0 Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation LE-d 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet4',,C'Pe al o 0',..---„,;,;„ ; 0 Art • ,1•p., --- � ,.- , �.. tai it .# Y ar •55 lR i r $ r' ' a 7+00' ` 5 f i , w • . ` • ` • r , - - ' r,' _ d '' 7 - ' r . � • F I fir. . # `� ' a�.. , i y --%. 'r 7I` R-77'Y •....V;) A , t ' ,�°� . ■ri.,r ,'; � ...:.:,M.,1144 t .r. +s- .,,�4 Ali 1 1' 1 '- . Mr ; i yl ` ' ' .BMs .s4 3r • + � • ..SL. �j.� ' ,� + ' ' f • �- YE ryi taT ` 5. : f . w 75 f< ' "'�' ,,til;r� "i�' 'e.;: v ,‘.,40d Fo co 2 Legend: d A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number #124 0 Baseline Stations 4 Distance to Vegetation s d 2003 Baseline 4 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 C1 j�[ w - - -April 2013 Mean High Water Mil Feet 0 =1' rw ; 4 - .sti A IN 1 f ' • 16 4 8, f'6..-1-00 . .„ ,,e4,,,,,.4.444-- , - . I4, ted•' -�'' ....."1111$6. f '1/4a r w 1 • • * 4 lint . opt f. ' rp ! .- Nfie x \ I 41-00 4 ,. 1 r y � ' jj I4 sow I l. 1'� ,�, F 1 4 f js , ' J *4r�r ' I ;o > . , • + �J �' ,. , fir. .:. ti 4. 73 I " • 65175 +� '�- 'r ftp' C ��' ,, W I ,r,. ,. 4, I • N § fI i 'V L Nm 7 b# .�.p4.APilnI y, N Legend: 72 A FDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number TD #125 0 Baseline Stations 4-110.Distance to Vegetation ‘E,-- 2003 Baseline H Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 fii1 W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water � Feet -1 " o �i ]R — • '- r' va s .i, . ► • O , . , l' -� / I r , "r 7 •, .k. .00— , 00— f d1 T r rr' e y n. ` ry ;� ,/j . 4 . 'am1. 'wMaw r• y • ` " • rPf"OL4r41i `- r i .a1 ' 1+00 6 , I''t (0, / J w - q4 rf•,. 74,0 d ",„4t tt.-- filX,¢ .. `I yl I ,f X.'i. ti kf � edw a% . r d ry 1111.167''..11"41§k,' fs -,,, ' _ . flia—"11% • .id. Y c¢-.Att.., ,, N Ip.u•RJ r • t il 4* m:41.' 4. ' ''' '''.*of:li.:'t..::'.1'51..-'3,0:10.444;-4, /a q„ ,et ,.i/ XY.Awb�y �• S V.• F. Legend: 43 AFDEP Monuments 1995 Erosion Control Line Page#Number126 H ® Baseline Stations H Distance to Vegetation m 2003 Baseline ��Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CBi MEM LI — — —April 2013 Mean High Water Feet +t o 4k • 00 ..-'''.i . 2."* ., % ...‘. i. - ' ';•:,.• ' ts3' 1,0 <te -0 '-'/ , 'el,* I',, ,,, -"V- - '044.v • ', \ - iri —---- ,, 11 :: ' ' .• r 4*00 I , , • t #,, 1 T - ' - *'.- A \ 'fit - 41 I , . ' i. • N 1 65115 - 4. I tiit e t.,rri , .,, :..,..:, , "„it'.4 • . 1 I '' •''''-,Al t.:* 7-•''' ,t ; .` ._— tir 5+00 ':i..'- ' ,0 , :*•,• , I0 ' ... .,..". A i , k I • 0 .tt. 4 :;.: ' -:4i,-*'''' ' “. • ori... 4 • '` ,A,A,*.,..' * 110,10.4.e , . , . .0'.....,i, - "k.. ...'4'• 0.... •F , I 4....• '4'1: +it 1--!,,, -.,,' , ' ..t-, - ',* • ,i ,,,, . - . ,, 4" 4..-..-: rt: I et..h ,..•- . , ft i.0 ' ''..* ' 41" -.1? „i'cl-.4•6. "*,., .21.;•,...-". yie,....'' •-,,.,„„' 4-',/ . I A ,„. I .0• /A, .0 • . , ,,, 00 *1MA° -I 4. . . , • 4 '11' I t, • '. Pr, Ibi t t.t,•7'''' 7.' •' '..'" ./ ' • ---....''-' ....f..a...1........./ I * -'•. ' tr' ''' 400 iiNtat 000 4 . "•• 1,4 4,'" 1 . 0.. • _ ...fa, - I r, ;Of , Ellir • ' ,F A.Z. . tN4,-,‘-'s 1. . ; • . . . ,.•• y I4. 1' ' Ai •,,. t . , I / ' , 0. I - ,o 1,,q. , .,C.F. m • , ‘ _-= .., Ark. Li, ' ' 441rr ..,t...tt';850-1 0 let, :Cf. ,1..4.4*. "t"Ail' ' *-."1. '0'4 -#:;-- ..g co <Ni ..9 Legend: III ‘.EPage Number 2 A FDEP Monuments —1995 Erosion Control Line 75 #127 CD Baseline Stations +—I*Distance to Vegetation .- e- 2003 Baseline 40-10 Distance to Mean High Water 0 25 50 CE31 - - -April 2013 Mean High Water MIME Feet a ' -...• ' •• I ille4.'' 8+00 ' • -,.'.4„',4,,..-$I,'.,e„°;,,1.44-t•4e4,,,.,)k!.-,'-.,-4,r,.-.-.44‘i-1.4 C 0-,%;.,..'4 f1.—.--_,.r,fio:.e,,,,r,!,.-•`-1...”..,-,..r-1?14-11,,7;".,..,-i, .VA-i,r'LTX., -......,•I•,k c --.— vo . f 4 r ' kr _ ., , --... ::. ---0-0.-: -P. ''''',./'''' ' i... ,. . _. .. . _ . ' ' . ' Al .” —f' , ,.• .. ...2„... . , 1 . , . . .. .1 .415,41.... .. . ,‘ 1 ...,. $ i -a ' 1 *• -. 0 ; 4 , , ,.. ' ,,,, , t joi . .* i. ,.... . lA I ,- se, ip-4- ..,,, E i , , —- • ,r.,:.f. ' I , ,. I4 "4113,116 ' r " l'a c*„... 4.t ...41,1 .....i A. lfr. • . „, ''.4 - of a . I r.i 44 1.• A )\,, 4" , 42 650550– 1 0'' +' * it'''' ,`•' ',4r - , -"Ifow.4.,A. A', •'''- . , v•---+ 010...) ••i Ai .4. , , R179. .f,'•-•., 1, 1 .. ,,.., ', 40 1‘'., ";1,10,; ."-.1"..7,,,.., 2r. 0 .0; ••?' ' I . t re r,•.',4',, , . 1 o o o• ,r ' ..ror 1, A 441.11‘ . , • ',.. ,-:(--- '' ,, ' , •,,.. = 'r . .* ' -, • \04:0'. k .0<4,= - ...,' .. ,,,,. ...,,,...- ,,,,r, -.. ,,,„) .s,„ , teft.7, I g I0 ' 0 -1° , •• . , k, L11 ZI3 1 1.13 C,1 ,E g en Leciend: •,E 1995 Erosion Control Line Page Number A FDEP Monuments -Y, 0 Baseline Stations 11-10.•Distance to Vegetation # 128 4-10A Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 In April 2013 Mean High Water Feet o -4 S ti r, w / N , o / a.. 1 1,1 i ..1� Y', I - '' 1"`1.' ' ' �' `� 650250- 1 a•,r I. d- \ 0 lit . 1+'.,; 44, `• , 1 , y , . I N " ;i ,. it 650100— 1 ' -' # '''''% t f." t". ' ' P 1 ... . ..„, , .44, 1 it N '05I d �" — cry7,7A IM` ' j;444 , M t 50 Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number 0Tc- 4—►Distance to Vegetation #129 0 Baseline Stations � H Distance to Mean High Water d 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CI3i WApril 2013 Mean High Water iil Feet l o .1"\t' .,N.t*iriS,111111:... 1'1,4.;704:,....:., , 4 , gp 1,i, ;it!, R i lr r ,' :!.'F - f 4.Se '+k ms+' y i,y . !•�' r " / ,y, 414. i . 4,1,c, ti . .. . .64111:4141111:i ag".-:*:''It* ' AN,. I ''' \ ,,' I ti fix. +�• x .... w .n ,.1, I t 4 —� ' 6496$0_ 1 ...,,-. 7.;. . r 1 11101 .is \ ".. 51 E . E. ~+ w N 1 f n O *.11r g', b.—t Legend: d A FDEP Monuments Page Number o �4--♦Distance to Vegetation # 130 U N Q Baseline Stations 4-10.Distance to Mean High Water 2003 Baseline12 0 25 50 °4 lik a W — — —April 2013 Mean High Water MN= Feet ` co r v y, ) 1 . .0I. COm _ N N ) +r (Jr O i. C 4, o 0 I4-.4``,.' .' to •. '., a 3 e r h !r 1 '4,w 4� r+ .04011 fI r . 1 35' ;moi-814 t '•j` � ) 1 �/ ,1' r'�:• 649350- 11 t 4 *-*�• ^ ' / ,. 1 s ,±� ; ,. 1 � .ria. )j/�L�i '" .v 1 *' .' � .r' ' : „ ' 1 •F 3• • 9f e ,! • 1 P r . ' , 1 +f y_ ' .,...1,04,/'.,,,, k.:11411111(106" „, 1111/44,11: , '\\_,,,%!,',0%, 1 ti` Ic I T 649200— �� t 3r Yom+, r } µ4:l,,�. w 1 IYv .w` I�iV ,, - ,_ .L �t; et -0 1 ' 4 . F t ` .w if Air. o ' le "Cr x 1 , kr,.f o3 , M Si mi .,1 i s A i , 1" a. i; L. Legend: FDEP Monuments Page Number U Distance to Vegetation #131 N 0 Baseline Stations 41---►Distance to Mean High Water e 2003 Baseline 0 25 50 CI31 W - - -April 2013 Mean High Water MMI Feet 0 CAC September 11,2014 VII-5 Staff Reports 1 of 5 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 2013 CATEGORY "C" FACILITIES 1. County Coastal Zone Areas — Beaches — Inlets Collier County 2013 Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities 189 CAC September 11,2014 VII-5 Staff Reports 2 of 5 2014 AUIR FACILITY SUMMARY FORM Facility Type: Costal Zones(Category C) Standard: Established for Sustainability(See Attached Synopsis) Expenditures: Proposed FY 15—19 Projects and Program Costs $ 31,509,700 Reserves—General $ 1,163,600 Reserve for Catastrophe(1) $ 7,570,000 Reserve— Reimbursements (2) $ 13,200,000 TOTAL $ 53,443,300 Existing Revenue Sources: Current Revenues FY 15-19 TDT Revenue Category A $ 31,825,100 SUB TOTAL $ 31,825,100 Interest& Misc. $ 421,100 Carry Forward $ 21,523,200 Revenue Reserve $ (326,100) TOTAL $ 53,443,300 Surplus or(Deficit) Revenues $ 0 Recommended Action: That the CCPC forward a recommendation of approval to the BCC for the proposed "Coastal Zones" AUIR for FY 2014/15—FY 2018/19. Notes: (1)Catastrophe Funds are accumulated at a rate of$500,000/yr.up to a maximum of$10,000,000. (2) A reserve in the amount of$13.2 million has been established for potential federal and state reimbursements. The status of the reserve relative to de-obligation Is subject to change. Some movement has been made relative to appeals and reduction of de= obligation liability,and applied credits for other project worksheets(PWs). CAC September 11,2014 VII-5 Staff Reports 3 of 5 Attachment "A" —Coastal Zones Standards for Sustainabilitv: 1. Dry beach width of 100 feet for the Vanderbilt and Naples beaches and 85 feet for the Park Shore beaches as measured from the 2003 beach width benchmark developed by Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and Collier County. The area is located between Florida DEP reference monuments R-22 and R-79 with the shoreline largely within critically eroded areas as designated by the FDEP. 2. Marco South dry beach width of 100 feet for critically eroded south beach from R143 to R148. 3. Annual beach and Inlet monitoring reports evaluated annually along with composite erosion rates tabulated by R-monument and summarized by beach segment. 4. Inlet maintenance activities are verified by annual monitoring and identified as follows: • Wiggins Pass—Major dredging event every four years and supplemented by a minor dredging event every two years and verified with annual monitoring. • Clam Pass—Major dredging event as required to achieve sustainable tidal flushing but generally expected every 3-4 years and verified by annual monitoring. • Doctors Pass- Major dredging event every four plus years and verified with annual monitoring. • Caxambas Pass- Major dredging event every five plus years and verified with annual monitoring. • Capri Pass/Collier Creek Entrance Channel - Dredging event every five plus years and verified with annual monitoring. 5. Beach maintenance and cleaning as required providing beach serviceability. Exotic species removal as required. 6. Compliance with permit and regulatory conditions: sand quality, physical and biological survey/monitoring, near shore hardbottom protection, dune vegetation maintenance/repair and endangered species avoidance and habitat protection. NI- rw O O O N C. O) 0 0 $ 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 co45 pp M .-: N CO (n O CO oh O M N N N N y I.p� E to to N 4 co "t N M, V CD 1i o }r B. C) •. n r uM7 M N tM coU Q 0 .1. �� 0 0 p0 p0 0 00000 N 01 6/ 0 W O ' O (O O co 0°0, a0 �O .O a0 p '- N O U N -- Y co < v N a) 15 r0 N M O r N- .M- N O N N >. C) 0 LL 0` Ta N a 0 f0 C C 0) C (6 C 0 0 0 Qu 0 O o 0 0 0 OI@ a) c0 N. coo. o ' O to O N CO E r Oi CO N O N O COMO % 0 ` C OD >' a. N Q tri N. ni . c0 NN o o n O - } e N N N � 4) 75 Iii pp p CE ° N ✓ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Q c �' %no Of0 N O ' 0 co0 o N f6 t4 (0 C� •O p� M COOa N CO r- N i- v O fQ 0 23- O C N ,FQ to o C) m CO 0 0 c0 (0 E 0 Lt. i}L " N N C �' aea 0 f0 a) 1e.- C a)• N v 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 Q Q 'N ,€ W n0Noi0 Oo vu0i $ � - �a 4C ooi V p (O m o 0 COo' CO CO m 000. Q p O A C• Amon } Q O t0 ri e- N O N N OO Q CD Q u' 4 ooc) �' g w coo E Lc) a� U) T 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 a a) V a. •L Q h N O ' O O) t0 CO N N O C a) Lo (y 4J r .- C 0 0 co N m co OP (gip co 0 •p of OQ O ti N t00 N CO V N T -Q _a Q 'C yN W N it) N O N N N ..+ iL 7 5 t rt, = 0• <0 v n E m }} CD E O N N Lc CO N Ea L- O) �d`i C) w ° ° O m 0 N ° ... .. 22 N L- a) C Q �' E E 0 V C a) c N f0 w t5 0 s E ch 0) ct N >, C = o U N 0 N U w y a) C a 6. O •C co D L t to Q. rn E +-' O N acc a) 0 Q c0 N cn 2 cc .g4) co a) C + U a) a) y C 0 co N C CC m - N U E C N C N E N Q 0 w .=+ �O O N a) fr > U . N < = a p -vu) a) a) a) , 7m ° = ° a) a 'C C . Z Z t) w C I— v) U. C Ce v a N > o va..p . ch . Em > U0, Z' > ° Ca°i Vis_ wa` CLWWaF°- CC - � oCCf—° z° 0' z3 ° z w x strw '41 ! 8 w a u n i., .i 4 ,a #.; C � is , I- f E 7} 7 ] L n '' a 1 1`- :i g, ; 8 8 g S 6 E n 1 a> i r i ( Sg $aU r t t 4 N 1 0 o g I a; �i LL i of 6 1T f Li 1I i H g $ i4 'd i "' � s I � ,f.f s Qi [ LL o o. m .......E .'., # ri Y_. _ gf. g. 2" E. { {i . E N w E 8 ''. 8 § 18 ' , u LL .,,I ., z -1 LL O £ i . I d t s g. B.N 8 N 'Vi) c .o 8 t•. it IIN N X - , - $:N LL 48; Z.R F 1 C t c i i s �I R $i $ n c a N ill Np ff ;P c d ( i i 1 f ! j � i 1 S 5 8 t OV LL N i 1 P., .8'2 c0 ! I 4m ` i 10 LLmLL ] E I 4i ! :11: i '11 X. V. i i E rt ,! 6 i ,, u {jj1j7 G . TI c, R 1F.I cI of a Ff I V 11 i p. v 1 komilid III I ., ,.:. 1, , , g ,., ;!... „.g t r6 rii ,i, , 7, 7 4..:, ,._ ‘i1_, g , :, ,,v ,.,, ,:F, r -,,,-„ ,.. i3iiiii, , g ., 0 , 11,1 i. ,, , , ,,, , .„ kt 0 (--) , , -,0 rn ., _,. .may co 0 9 O 7O o C) - Z am. o CD n 0 0 C 0 , . ,. „f- . 0 > ‘.... DEPAAVoinp UgH 03 � 0 -I et 4 ` E I -v CT) a .`., S o o � tor) -i , f-• o 3 = ,,,,„4,,,,, ,,,,; n —• O � 0 C y , .. VI -1Z) S a 3 � , CD z D t n 43 rDa' 3 4P'AP _' a,• • I.-9O N it p N a O I :: `• n ■ • ■ ■ ■ m ,..1 1 I p I I p m �. v D m -c) D r-r (D --- ) -o N . . . . O . . . . . (-) 0) O � O ' = c EDno 0 oCco , i O- (DT _• W = y ° n m * °S' n = C.1 "i NI cn O -s O 0 = D 2 o. 0 o - m ' CI ON Q CCD (p1_1 a) (D O cn r n s^ H = r+ �, ...< 0 (� r f. —s rev— v Cu 0 ~' r+ — -�, r_+ CO. - 0 v, v n N O v N (D -, 0 O _ v '-. (CD -5 m m ((D r r+ (( r (1) r+[p = V) O N r";': = =r+ WI a) C O 73 — (D M o -0 N n• CD 0 = 'I) r+ e-t• (1) =• • c (D n CU fD PO O 3 co O D n w <is D °' , "",' '1_,.kp-,-4. - .-. to D NJ 1 • • r") 73 c -0 rin I I I C 1 1 1 1 1 1 = M ...i., "0 n "T1 .C-3 a) 0 CT) v) --I c > > rD 3 (D c o -a-5-, o = -I I , m (D -0 -1 --1 x (" 0- rD a) 3 07 Ts ,- a.) --% ri• m n•-• a: (D Q. 0 = co - ,= crQ -‹ (7)-- ,..., 3 0 )-1 ,...., ,=•-• = — -_-_: v). Md rD CD < CI) a'a"' < '"1 < -<ti) CD CD RI. i LJ (1) (1) — rt -• _. x 0- cra -.< 0 ati 0 --I (..D w (1) B (rc3-.. t-ntl-h oCr 09 13 (1) 1 CD 6 re 0 — cf, =- ri. -% ;3 v, = cr -.., i.,, -, . _. co (1) = Cr 0 0 (i) > r+ — 0 r) (-) (D C --1 --N (D CD c 0 * -00 co T.; M 0 -3 CPO C (i) ET V) -74 73 r) (Di - t-i• _) (1) (..) 0 • — u) (7) = a) rt VI r D 0 0 -, ill 3 o 3 m • • rD 1....% q 71 - " -0 -1 < j..\..) ( CD 6 (1) CD ,...7 =- 0 Cr < 0) CD --; a) cu o rt (1) _.--• r+ a) -1 = 0 1-4 7,2 V) = D re; 0 = i1; co -1 u-i ‘,..,4 cam 0_ (D r) 0 -4, cl• f+ 3 ----_,- ---- _. 3 n) (f) o 3 = in 74: -- = 0- (..n. rD = 1-1 , 3 (1) — F-.) _ . CD.) = = ,.1 . 0-Q = ,... x0-rD CL wn ; LA rD D "0 -. 0 CD 0_ X (1) 0- Zi-j ,..... r-t- (-3 C -- -0 u-i --, (-1 ...= --1 011 1 CD co -C3 LA C -3 R a) 0 = -0 cl) 0 (1) = 0 0 su -*, x a_ Ott --s = (D 0 3 a) m Q x = m p co 3 • 0 0 NJ a: -' "--• G) -+, 0 .-= El--'i 3 -h I-1 c * 0 o --, .N.) iLl - 3 --1 0.) N.) = a) C) 3 0 I-1 -P C 3 = o -I Y1 (1) (* a_ (D (-) act r+ CDf-t- _. 0_ 0 D ri- = (/) 0 = -0 71' --1 o 0 0n (/) ..< CD -7) (") = c = -1, M -0 6'" CD — (D -, CMo.) < (1) 0- = V) 3 (A ,_. (D -o v) B o -0 a) CD = r-i• v) VI = 0- cn (1) (/) t-I- 0 cn -h F .r• 0, (A 10 u) a g, 1 r , -3 "...• ''''0 0 (D N a t I *, tk s i t A /A f• ' ik • 1 ri 'No/ n r-t- n ,,...... ■ rii71■ ,--, I I p I 10 n W fD -T15,4' t-� (D T (D. O NJ n [D 'TJ O IV n R. '� 0 O rn N '0 a) O rn cn 'v 0 •cr CD D CD v) t•o m a) -3 C N z SDN z (7D Z fv O =• Z O cn p N O V) p Ivo o n cfg D o D �' N Z 0 0 0 m o Q.) C O N U� N p 0 0 to o OO N U-1 O • °°-.I vo ` N) (D naCI 0 n v Oti 0) -10 Q * o z o 0_ 0) ry 7 3..f- N c O v, W II c.o (D D • D 0 4 .'' '''''''''til:,11 i, : -' ,t ' i —• ti r, �((L f y a _ zgg rill/ O D II m@ 1 4 � a a T g E;REg N ' ® , �_„ G , a L3830W 8 r o30rf 0Qo o Om Ov _m -0 *"."--------------- 2'q289? -�— I A p 2 0 2? m V,3 an d Z p 9 a g 600yNy g -;$8 prlir� } y e yr�y mgyDOp 2 102o z r 0 Q C)v_- a z x�Dm npaz 0 tv } il �� SD a .9 40,,,. ymy rn } o=am �T yyln A py n m Q O O11 Z� .1077 S O O v 2r Rm } D Ij ar W m a O 47 m p m z II rr� < ,t a O nm 2 m y r � � a �g v, "' P Z ar% j v a y m ii t''‘ pl - 3r 108 x C 383000 I -.... to.,:_•.4_,,‘ t v3.11 rl z c) ,,7 ad: ill y�/� m ■a 1111/111 �, *,,, o m gill O k°' ,r..� r A E 403000 i D 1 1 E 403000 3 �rn p JO 0 O• 'T a� Zy 111 OO Z yJ 8Yb pJ i DADE BR. o 1y x cn 3:13 II If / -I• — T r ,O • 0 0 E a Z gg ■ ■ • I I I 1 0 11 1 1 1 1 0 1 I I o N 0 (.o = W —1 ^ ♦ N W I I-A W aD 01 0) W w w 1-1 01 �, O ao CD 0 I'% °° o CD o o I D .1 NJ. I — (D Ul X- Qoo a' as , 0 0 °1 0 = o Q w cfq 00 o CD 0 = m e I rf -. ata C (1 ata -' 0- > r, 0 = r-+ D m n �� • V1* '< e— - Q (1) N CD CD ..0 _ -1 O r+ — n N a) N' ? N -s O a) 0 n On 3 0_ 03 ro Ocu O tF CD- ♦N CD c D 5 n = Nv CD n a Cta N O n < CD = • Q t: ` r N fx' , ill i 4: t 0 0) CA• 4). Q( �'' kriq Il , y • ■ ■ is to N r D 70 z O O 1 (-) N CD Ox �' p ( N +*� CD CD -s �'' wAF ,,,,;.:;,,:i, <• cu . -3 cr ,t 0 cr O CD O O rr (I) — O -1 r-F a C CD -fi -N O N CD 0 N < a. CD rh rr* 13 -' O— CCD Q 0 �^ M 3 n- �' CD W 0 Z Y 0 to . '• £ CD O r-� fin a) 3 a- o nd ' O iSV # �Y (D r�'t S O ` t ter rt — x C -j N ' c -' -0 o lr r_+ 15. •a C' cr C �, -t, I o r > < 0 i CD :: C Z CD $,,- CA cl- CO CD _ \D J W rf = 0 rpt. ,0 -' 1 (D co Q <� a a -1'1 .1 I, . O A e \' 5 •;, n ,\\ ryi _ \\ ,,, $ , , c„,, ,,,, . 1'\ \, - : ;. ''y; -�•�' h1, x M,�; a s r yw� 3 14 . 7 I' -_1 t a }r �T �a t 4 ; r � $ -w', rr, ar4e,'1... .7, ,�,_ ,:I'� •w+:. -_.a,7 4.'$i^ Q ••I 7 $ ', I I I I a c R . y , -� • i , ,� .; y , 4 hhi! !I ! if� �t 1 ... . Nei hy A � —s • CO 44 ■ ■ mN l D o I I I I I o o LO = 01 0 O(-) m O -1 W —, c 1 VLm e-t, m c m (n I-, (n n 2. 2. fDO _ = N = ac)D . = o ='2 n n N 3 O o c �, ,-+ c z Z n) m s Q Q v �, W (D = Q 3' N m v CD 70 r* O Dt) n 0 m 3 0 - m °' ^ D' -a co0 U' -+, CL = = N as r+• = a. co — 0 - Q <� N .� ,t. f" i CS) N A 3 30 _ —" m } z r-) N f o II tn p , II p r> ® 0 P �Omvw[)N I = 1, ;ono T OMOT T fl , •�� i�moiD m A'31 A m 1, iivg00y ii oP Q51 y P m2 pAt 2'O 20 2 h4,4 ,5,40,,,,'a i � $ m % 3 Z T O / Z Z A f D -, f m x, cn h 1 L 389000 y % tl R� A i Midi Si ,% , a , _PI'' _./. ,-'1r . .$ m �;h 't. r y e E 403003 R —: < I °f coo � ' �_1 m z Z .... 5 Z to — once o e•. A .. m S § Q y Z ;0 T' . /,,, K x 7 1/' o : o1 riZ z MOMZ �8 In mrsm•••mmmn.m...••••mm••• CO ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ r--F C I —. G co W 0 0 W ? 0 H' CO O O_ a) .p r-tv,+' C. -' - O — W O ((D g' ? � f-p70 O 013 -' — O (D Cr O DJ r, m 0 o .-* v 0 r.f N -�' W Cr m O N O Z 0 \ - el. C CD N �_ 3 c-' n 0 o o v a� CD cn ". O O N N = n -, Cn 0.0I-A0- 0 o m I 0_ 0 .p m O 0 O -h Q. a M e C r+ C) O r+ (' —. <� Q () . 3 ,). g '.: te i ' i, - . .11-.,,.. . —70 4 / A ii wm .. 1,v► 0 0 1 , . . 1 1 1 1 1 'S X55 (71 r ,55 2 ....N S\15 OO .e J r Q ) �t1 ff`�� yL ......,-°e ` Pa <.. tr 1..,m --- 3 .. }1, V� --y Fk VTar`,-.i. ,Y~t�,., •� % ;moi *,`* P . .: RI• ;° k i4�5;, . l !Hr3h: CO c,,, i,., . , , , „ ,,,, _ .., ,:i.,,,, :•:-..ii..,,,,,,.1-1; 7..-^iLi Ili :1 11 I,. i izel,7.,C ri- i .4.„--',,',: . - c, ... III.,..fit. ,:. ;igl v illi , ), ,, . 02ii i" CO ■ ■ ■ N m Il ) V o 0 1 1 1 1 1 o F-- rx-r = O W c vs C 's 13 Z n p w * -0 W ! r) -' e•l• N O� 0D 0 C r1 in a) -1 �P CD < CD rF (D (D Cu (J•I O V1 n N73 a) (D CDD 011 a) .. = Z �. n CD -- rs Cs Vn• ,.,,,. as O D �- CD (D O ' 7r -I (D O Z (D n = -s Z• < n' _. 't. Q _ _ = Q• —, m '< W = N = cn ,-t O ''* O = 3 O CO — —h < = ^ Q = N = W O = O Q 3 < O O N O (D 0 es cn 0 0 C c rt O v N. CD CAI I CL 0 rr _ 3 -s 0 = n 0 N CD I-- -1 O W <"o C3,m , ill k 0 co � M4 m r 3 '.i• ?" N Z -,`� G7 /�1 5 c.-_, —c. C jj 0 m m mma (� o/ O r-, u ��N'^m oo 0 $ NJ o On .rl zz m m 0� 4 •- m A '—' m :S) Z D C!1 m (n Z A ADC? cri -r Z \ T= Om0 CO 0)n,Z W o nm ii. (/) etZgzm c o mc'�m .. m Z nmm -•i 7, `�Enm - rm „ o c wpm I C) w 73 w D K m 2 Z + , Z -T7 �, -1 oa m 67 (n M CD w Z Z > • -.y > n * < rm- Z� ♦ \ a,V' C) i m m � � � �,Z z z � 0 ca V I oa f w(2 w cn m r m m a, �Acr'o ' co m A m + cnNCD , ) CD CD M-+> + c}Oi' 6+ 1 fit, , ry cn ��:.::` �+�. CC2 vo O N oma' •;::• �' ..--.=i---;.:-..„,-' --i CD M m m ( v!/ ` v �_ m -1-2 (8 rn gi Komi Z , 0 o z ;,,- L'co CO} � 1 ) i c7 i m m O n = FO mm m m m� n m m N m 61 > C . j _ -T. D o rn Z }O� } W D ? W N CD m —' o-a cri03 w Z w ■ ■ ■ Q) r--1- 0 Z z oO CL) co V N n.— (D (D (n (D vii CD N � � M CI) 0 0- = r+ 'p ,C CT (D r+ (D (D 0 N 0 to 's N S -z C7 Q. -1 ID = o a) 0 0 CD 0!q . N <_ a) N m� �, D CD a , ill �0.. - .a, �Myy � . (i) OCO N) N A ok,' '�: 1,t0° , 5 . ■ ■ ■ • mi (..) at, ,,, Ui p (-) 73 fD N � fDa_ PI 3 < n = -% "O •�< O_ N O v O c m Ct. < fD W 0 = = c — v N p --% r-„ 0 W 0 "< fl. O- r+ C cin -.< CDD Q —CM rt N = = O m' -nC p rn Oro W v) fD G n -p r'* f7 N r_t '0 r+ a r-r CO p O fD = v fD n rt c -_ O Q fND W * 3 CD (DCO f'Dv O_ K T O p O O O :::: a_7- rt - a Q QO O + n) 3 O Uq rD v) 0 N N () CD = �. 3 n N 7 fD NOW T ..-.. N r CD O v) ' Z Z fD • 'p 0 O D ' n O - 0 NJ Z UteN.)• C = v, fD W n Q. 73 tT p rt U'l v) n 0 O N fD N G� N N 0 °� 70 I Mk N -� z % .V L : c o �. J , ' CD VI 0 ' t#.. „4. n ro f ,1,''' i ..,..,,,, , 0 . , ..,...,...1 c,-) 0 e „ 4„ _,, , (D <+ . , , , - - - — - i 4 , 4, Com -' �043 ' No 0 P , •, ifr, 4 7. T N NJ A 4,,,,::,,,o , Oil r r- 0 Or3:1 00 r _. N ° 1� .ZI • T^ /S`1's'��.sjt7 1 4_Y�USFWLOGGT FL2v7 USFWS OGGTFLf26 � —x — i, . #R • TF 10- y I�': ,� c\, _ . ''',, ,0 • � afn •-• { ' 1 , 1+ �',7,,: oml 'k� 4 .,1 "0".7-? s t°. l 1 ; . j ,- .r O 'F Ty C ..t i:+..a ,,...,..,,r. ,,..,..,: , - ...,•-,,..-.:.-:-.;-, -',,i,,,,:4 . _ . A viva. .1•--441,efr44 . ... e• 4 ,.,: ..:.• .14,,,, s • 1/ • , MIe ~....4` t' wy : M !bIfka t p r. TE7'p " t•if . ry, 1 .*40* M- , • r �. _ aig ..r • ' Y r� mm , ,„...y„,,, ,�1 J�' ■i'a xr r.? '`.. " j r •j° r K�. ..*W' 1 y , pQ 1 j`'` .]w. L71 � F }# a y � 94d l t4 `#._ �� ijEz. i � z {ire' ' '1 -.4 .'-.. lit • it 1 "�" �J� „o% V ,.A. .� ,• -r.. S . r,, Ate.,; s1--. ;- ��-y1. -{; t IN ►-x C ,O z r-+ m m Z CL v C p 4..-rD m C T !� 1 = r- CD fl- N o p v p O CU Vt N a� O CL73 N t--71: (/11a1 < W O ' . < O ! NnOZo O n D r+ rr NX- V) TT N CT -N '� N z N N O OU E V �=+ CD N V -0 cl o_ -h Cr (D 0- CL n O r n ^ m. (ND v n-r rt C — D (D ^ to < •. (1 n O r -71: Di O O fD T O G 0) tn (D v =_ - cin f^+ 0) 0- CD f O O N ,f5 t if, ' , t N O ilill (Dr"171C T+F jya.�� i 1Y fy (� (....) , I rn _-0. • • • -0 • • • M = ri- -0 O 0 . (-) ts a) i-i• -0 -, n) o LACfQ rD _0 = e+ 0 UQ o'6 2) -°-, cr-. 5' <' c (.,, co = (/) 5 =,* 0=- = - c v, u. • f-+ -o Lr, c rp --, ..-;;• o -v 1-") -. — CI CU 0 -0 3< cu CD 5 a- = o- --P. o — — cow = = al v, z -9, (D = 0 —. 0 C 0, 3 DTI' • ,...0 , eL = o = o- v, 7-1.7 —• V/ 1--A = ‘...f,, 0 0 im 0 V) -1 o m rD (on = r-+ 1-..1 CI 0 -7' = 0 V) (7Q 0 B -' ;:;* cir. N, cr 0 73 VI = 3 x' ox) o r- — 0 — -0 = 0) 0 0 —• M i-pw ro= LA 011 8" -7 (73 = VI 0 all rD — v, '' - z%. ca. r+ = = = v) 0 0 3 r+ -n =cm -o T = LA = (7, ,.., rn 0 -o o -6- - Cl. 3a) n) --, LAC -, CT --I =: e-r (1) = V) r..,-- rj• r+ 0 V) -. _ Di no = .--- (D W m < "0 CO 00 (1 '.1 * C'ELI ) = rl" (D r) o -, v) Q.) v) r) r) 7:3 r* CD — = -1 5' m r .d a) (/•) i: ) --, cm l. -, CV - (-)Q . , - —. s 0 0 -, r) 0 0 -N V) rD (D son 0 _. = CDB CL (1 n = v, -a c = , co w = o 0_ .-+ c-) . (..) 3. r+ CT 5 c (1) 0 .......... au (-) = -' rD 0 ET 7as rD a. -o O'Q cn = c-.) .• (D _ a) -, CD Z .) _ --• . 0 71: Co r-i- C .. , ,.... . . .400. ..., . , 44 0 ',..- S3.1 /1 , ,,, • . . .6„,,,,,, ,. ..) . , „„,, i.,, ,,,.., ,, :,..„ . . . . * ':;-si..., . ..:;: .. .,,' 0 •'f .. 'I, 't, - • ' ' ' ' ...? ,..... t '`,..I,o' a) 4.Ali 5‘.ipr . it ,...., (./) .. . 0 (I'.• C) 0,10034:717 4 :;.:;-, i '1"-----.46•1F, 41:ii,„„) . ''',',.• .:44110 r) 0 cn ,..:: '11 . <-0 -o It ' •,,, . N v) = , --' *,'t, 1 .,• ) = 0 , 0 , ‘, ._, COXI -•'')s 'I) - 0 13 NJ C I l'' 1 iq • -,0 0 11 -n m : ...\ CL (i) cn 0 -.. .1. 4.4., ..-, . i• 4 n I I II ,....../ — 1 > K = a) (-) • • • • "0 • • a 0 3 -0 rf t-) fl 1--- ID 0 0) 00 -1 r+ e. 0 0 - — r.) -0 '"s - I I I I .2'2. I I 1 c C cu r.t. M M 0 M (1) cr) v, 0 ,.... 0„ 1_, -a m o -a CL -0 rD -0 -r, C = ..-. r-, r.,. n -1-1 = a) - 3 .'" — D C = r 3) LI) FP rLi.• + (;), -) D cu = C• a) -1 3 o -I cr, 0 o (7n, e n) "rE C 1.) = 74.. 0 c f7:r.. rD (3) .... CO 1." CU .." 0 0 = VI = 5.1. C-5 ..0 a) r-, = 0 (1) = c) (-) 0 C2- cm ,....- - m -i 0) 0.. ..„ -4' c) ••.< -Z 8 0- -0 (D k.., v, = 0 m cu 0 r, cu r., Ei-.)• co 3 a_ 0 -9. < .< 0 ...,•. -0 ..< , V ----. -' L - (D el 'S (1:0 = CD< CD (-) SD ,C,I,) 0 < C 0 > 0 (7) (-) < x (T) SD (1) (0 .... -0 V)-2;- -(i) C vl — ,--- a) --N e) = ,•••• o (D 0 r+ ''..- 1-1. rD DJ — M o cp CD -+, • • -1 L)-1 EL -• (--1- = -Z ,5::. = ='" 3 v, o e-t 0 —ft) CD c 0 r•-) = 0 -0 0 0 FD-- -< CD (r) 3 -, ..< ,ug .• ul 0 m rD = = -1 -n CY) n) -1-, 0. o a) 0 = = 0 N.) a 0 0 v) E--1 r) -0 = U..) -2 o 7.- ‘.., -s I I-1 (7) z ft 0 .1=2. If o CD = a) 0_ v) r) 0 o -. r-i- = -, (/) Dia C11:1 -I1 cp .13 M. (-) at1 .... z (ID 0 o u) -11 crg CI) <58 - CD 0) 3 cn cr - - ' • -- 1 •,,. •,.•„- __ •;.,_.,r , , , CD - 1 . .. *%, " .114. - -. ,Imr40... .. • 1 . - ' . --, .,0•_;47.7., • • , ' r..) - ,..,.„. _ •- -, • ''' —.. r-t• .,,,,,;,it', • '4"-.1,- ' \-\.; ;I' 1 , • it , , , mm @ 1 1 a L WM n ,!!iiiti P 4 a M°;�" rRsr�i� m A z g a '$. O E v�' % Qt �� ZD 4. a -..-<>i,,, D D N� N 1/ri O> a g;mm c i%. z $ A6102 mo m) �� z my 1 1 D 8 I, \{ / T 0. O A p o ', \ �/ y c g y m m si $ , y q a Z a m8H - L. PI\ I\ 07 \ ST y D k ' 8 4 { n C1 lil)C; # ‘1 illig O r. a r >�.� L Arty c '11 m o r x.A n A r. R A g = Mo T !niMO D tt LSflgl O r'0 1 1 <O § �cO') 2 ii?. C o yDADE g.�. S ti m ', l�N $ m y T ml Ai ti' ) O 3 X iT. � s g RyA I 11 1 ( 1 2 4 - F-- * o r, o n o ° I I I I O rt N or, O O -1 S m C O 3 (D Q (D p S� N — N N N �' fD i..-1- CD a' 0- DD r+ r. O S C - CD O O O a- -0 V1 '< 0 < (D '+ "Ti (D CT CD VI N Iy n 0 w O ,rt - ' O0 (D cn -' 70 n 73 r* '< 7p fD m cti C N a. = 7 CD a O 70 N n crq Po N (D rD CU Cr (7 X' 3 'B 'O (D 0a. co VI I." 0 rt 3 Ch. C 0' O >y Lc' 0r+ p 73 CU = C O 0 K !Z 7D W •• D (D VIV D 1 C D co n m cn cr 04 t D �yy u s 4 Y e Q C 2130W 2 li //// 0 , .... . • ,?, / m �- / ).m r'.rel i Z g / o pP0 c�'n wp X I.,. S t. At- ND ,. 1, J J c>,/,.. p k o 0 / ( 4.1 .:.: fli,,,„, . , ,. . . k4z,,..,_ . e. cr. in , ,,..„ ,• , , C N fii mT • DOR Na RI Cn G) / ,� 1 y 1 1 E c) yA A y� A �' �. riir y �. 2 1 U v ---.;r +-. r 7 m w ,--2,,,-.1!..a. - Z <n m D y O rn YA A;,r:,-A�470� vm �x m m Z �N a �`. .P' F ``alio' ix. O i, / 'f" iso ;'ti i.,...1.1._,... w ,. ,. T ♦ \ v. ` C) i .�i - r--F- ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ D K o D Z m _ o o w o -, m -0 co c � � VI DQE wCD m' °' (p cria = = ' -a rD n r* Q- rfi v 7a r V) v � al . � (11 — CD s co e V) ° °* ° . ' v ° �' o r-t n . • o Q O N' r.) .t "0 CD p 0 -3 os . ,° �'' Qsa — m CDo rO w Z O cv Q m N a) to o 3v p 0�1 C 'S W N 0 0 = rl r0 a; 0 coQ V " C (1-< N �- O n 0 mfir < 43 CD cr al k1 �V �+ .� ! '3 • ±s:; `+,'�;��1�4 +fit: }' --� - a) rD O o j ,At ' ... fi: � I }." p ` + O) vii A t N)-- a ,,,...low.)........ 4:` X =E =. 0 3 ..* Ck --x II CD ( rrimo .) ---. 0 _p C -0 0 SD €. 1.:.• 1.,..., c 11-ff -. cp -. t, N.,...... 5 - L_ n 3 Z .' W 7-: z ) , tak ik. 4 1 4 in' ili' 3 3 Q 0 .. , L i, 0 LL ... 0 v r-t• al 1 I lv Q9 , 0 a2 3 rri.,7 i .r1 V• n ....,,,,, il: .0 L .33 tu til l: 2 5 G: . ,.... ..c., 0 .. _ CD C-) r-t• a a • • V) (i) rri I I I I Cu X I Li1 p 1:3 ID -' (D CD. =•-• (-)-‘ 3 CD CD ,,,, rD 7..i... m c r+ ,-t• 'I.' VI e-t r) — rt A, m (12_ '4 •• _s- c,_ E (-37- rp* • • w' --' r-+ ..._ .... "C5 = •• = .."1 3 a_ Cu Cfg (T) = r71 (to " -t 3 e-t• a) x u) (D . - r-t- 3 0 x 3 9, UJ -0 oi (1) vi• c CD I-1 x ,,-• °•'" n a) ---m r+ C:).. et - -. , . °'&:)‘ I-' .5- V) Ocz 7---••• (D 'ID C 70 — rD 0 C , , s:). Q.) V) 77 -t 73 -. > V). 'CS a) CO ( — a) p I sp ra.. v) o (D 0 = 1-4 =i sn , n o UJ _1:3 _ UJ ..„... v) • -• K E v) c t171 —* = D 0 = tr, r) = P a) - •• VI CO 3 , 3 FP- V) a) °) 3 CO cr ...- / ! , , (D li fdt n r171 ,,..., • • • • x = r) CD CD n O • • _0 ° 3 0 M 2 O pi Ft' r• O-I CCD 3 m 0 v 0 cn _' o o Q 0 O o 0_ 03 = -s v) 2- D n CD v) N 0 cD CD v 0 O rD v) cu N v' rD _ �Q• cra n — = -a M -I. O'4 sTi- rD m a. 0 rD =•co rpt N n rD C C• =" to - aD CD O 3 rD O. (D ET 3 - 3 N O 75 0 nV D Q < , Q ry+ r $i,! 1 r ,....,.._,, 2-11 i 111O-0 N w yc�f �, } i3O11th• �l %j,s Z r. >0 — I � : .' �d T D n D O B� z o m Om m0 (A Z r o °o z c`�i 8,..�-N7..-- ri, '/ row mz om [D- VA o co m m / , rotary oI Di z A ,P°u_ —'O m rn ',+ / (� Xm �Z C • P A�n$ zv Dm �m m OO 'i • f n ',7) � oo,..5,,,,'c/71,* : m m cz o0 I ..T mz r NN mrn z7- m 5 DO 3 ( T ,. Z5 c")> op m ,o `", O� O O p w cn 3 1 ; 1, co m , a n A Iy [ rn_ �i a%c : <_ / /, -- al= O 2D >P cZia = _ 4cPfl zzp \l IT m z 2" m / 00 8 y O Ir =9 D =m 8 < `2 r ,r m O z �co m O Y m < -a .• C ate. C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ C r-t' (CD < p I I I ((b I l I - v 0 2 N O O O - m vv, (D \ �• (D r+ (D E K o z K K o Q 3 r': 0'q N 3 _ -s Q' = v c Q = °moi c `<C O OCrQ p0 -p N N O Z O < °). NJ )> < a). w (D O O ,G Q C� Lr, N N 00 iZ p N cn Q r-t O n m N _ p m N O v1 N n Oo O CD (D (<o n rr O = O -1 o.! = a) Q CDCO C' o p 4:a N (7 co O, • (D ro .A ( O (D (D (p -1,_, = D n <. — Qn D. II 0 � � V" O v- z -400000 . 000b09- czo O 0 0 0 0 CZp o 0 0 0 ro) 0�0 o o 7 a o r00 OZ OD ---,,,3/4„FA x.., Fir" ..rte..""iv! �\J -,-) ZDN r� D-I D in X, Z -420000 �� 7C J� , a D D� m m ./ , m z D t '\ .11111c.,N g' zi ,-, 1 { A -440000 Z `�+ ')t '- q ; Oj :7_ ,,r1i:',. rry ,J O T -48001, `\ <----) rna YI m 5 m 0 o m Z Z o D mpm � .- _\ o - O z -1 13 Z 1- -;a -� f7 � O a /.. r 13 z F. -0 -480000 rn ! Z K i� m = � mmZ 11 z. �1 . O' - . r ill 0 7, C . c,,,, „... , i„,,. 0 4 rn c o �� ` j m T_-- .> N• r�500000 ' .r..•. ! 1 . a) c ■ • ■ ■ • —. P'� O C D -,-„,1 prDgC no N0 CD ph C �' N CD -1 n C -s a) -, r* ) CD Q N r) (D =I; cam0 • /) � CD v. rD (1) T p v N CD f N .,C '"f N CD O 0 O r+ O - CT = n CD Lo cu lC) < oTs O ,-+ r-P CD D � O C CD — -o —,O O Oti r+ aq CO rD C r+ -< CD CD r+ V Q n a1 /1 C-0ow — O l ”. 3 n- zm z = e ,„ _ 0 i> ii y a , , ii3MIN :: ,,ri, * 1 li I PURE§ io *$ 1 L 383000 r):1 3Hmvo o�opo „ y�yov % r l o0m02y m $D TO O A Q W F. rd m CWV ��AA! m mT8 ° Zz ® Ao ) { z AD8 IIr , oA mm O( BS D f r tN M1 ' 11 "/GZ N or M3 H O Tq , _ - A ` 383000 C) dh \ �,. " rk ^ ,, \ .`.3 O�t A ta - a iii)1 414 ia Yi'• 03 Z ___‘\ 'tea 1D r1 ,74„..c.....worsiagorowai00110., -4 roA.1 I k, mi CD f- $ in; O kap ^� y E 403000 r L 403000 gm 3 S m C' O p O O A' p 5 DADE °\ 5, m D cAm A z f ,��' ,' O z E T N / li I - Or ■ ■ ■ m fe 4k � N Cr fD 73 2 •< 7N n fp lD C O urDr _— . z' _� O '* • rt � c 7r N = o Q. fD rt (D 10 t %,',myz- 4r+ N 0) CL '< •--. rt fD "" O N pIq' z v 0• -o NC/1 44 X' r-r O = n 0 (D � .r6 ' °' rt -a u, O 0o oNo m m O cn s a� ap n�, ,� oo -3 a. (D D O c O O re # 0 rD nO el- (D N n .h e O - . o C7 ng "D O = 6 9 m K ` Cr) D r.71 as ¢¢ m O O_ 1 to F `` 4 (n LA o Eustatic Sea-Level Rise Relative to 1992(m) CD ruil LI) . iv 4- T 6 o +v + O . . . i 1 . 0 1 1 1 1 y CY m v CD SD n ti U) 491 CD C O au CD o a off, us cn b in C 0 X01 O -S Z CD 0 Oyati In a o 0 D r-r Q. D Q Q N O n ^J z z v) -0 yy� 0 FN n ...� : _7 70 VQ O 'O N yyy ill ')+': r jinn. k i ! r 1_ • .--I 1. j • • . a. Nn -z o C) r -< Q 'a O Q CD a C Q ,4 i t N '< ,-I. Q - Q. �, O Q n rt av �; Q c CC) - m r 011 �_ oil cn v)O 7.C. o N o .< °- •x— rt'� a' n .° r+ rt CfDO o i •z CD O 0 0 cp _ O fD CD as ara - C - nm m - - co V) �' 7) z,CD n O (D 0 -in O O v) fD n <Jai' n v v7, 1-1 W m ,p�, .' 1 VAI 0‘2„"O N Y rn y A OM1' I^ ■ r 31 n ■ ■ ■ ' G) N ScI tin fD LD CDO -0 O lfi rrDD 0 r-P5 CD "Ci O CD 7r ` CD O Ln CD rD v rn CD Cfri r+ CD CD = X CDDO O C v N n rD co as 0 ,• "0 = C n N a c r+ -t CD fD fD a) 0.— )C N "0 Q. ..< • CMa (.J1 cu N O n. x -1 CD v) CD N 7-1: m O a .< r+ r+ —h O CD -o C N n 5 CD C -0 N 0 0 a.. CD n CD CM r+ 0 - e-t m 0 rrD U 1n <a o) N 7- Q co _ LI O •� N lav y'ua�. rn, I ,?x , ��-,. � O O 4 r D r+ r+ UJ LW S D W W W W W %. W W W N N N N N N I--+ N N I--, I-, N 03 oo V T LI' - 6 N 0 tD co V I-, O V at V) . N I-• O V ro Q 3 lD Z o D m D D D C -1 Z -I I' Z o m S D O c < _. '< 3 3 G S y (D m o m v -, S. tv -O r+ CD c N O rt O X• r-+ co d a >? m r+ _d to a d 3 ,0 fl- to -O S - ' 7 o00 Dpi Do 0 °F •v 3• q. 00 - rD o ° n o CD C 0 rm+ m a -I a to to < to to rm+ 3 N vt in G) O a) 3 2. o o o m (D cr D) r•r m o VrD I D, 3 3 r3D ,� O CD 0- 3 S 3 n !"D -0 -co 0 CD o Q Q a m 3• o 5• -< 3 0M - c c �' v v3, 3 -0 0) .-+ v,• Sv to O_ LA d O_ N 3 d CD p m N '< ° 3 3 0) N m m '^ ;° , 3 C G) r+ = a O O- (' 3• N - -- LI- 0.) a < '< n a cm 3 3 a rnr O CM a = O 3 N O_ h - 0 N a ET OT CD tai, 7 3 cr 10 c O� n m ~•' 0 to 3 .� O_ a a) O_ fD 3 ti, fD O_ 0)) 3 c O r, a 3 3 n 3 a c - D) N r+ Q r+ , r+ 3 O_ p G U 3 fD rtft) 3 3 ff N O_ H fl/ p m 0 cn c) < CD e* 3 3 5 n ul r m 0) 3 3 r3o w et a o Q o n o y ', to 3 N N N Do CD o -., a ti) o a 6 N 3" N ft 3 cn 0)) j I' m- p 3 OU S 3 7-1 o 0 0 z x 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0000 Z 00 Z 00 M a 3 c 0 3 -' -' -, -' 3 -, - 3 m 0 CD fD m m CD m co m m N m O ao CD m m m fD CD m m m ^ _a m 5 * _a _a * * 13 c rt 2 d * c c c _o * .0 _a * U / a n -< -< -• < < < H a T d =i • • z < R. < m a a m m a a m m m a m m m m m m a m m a 0. ^' O o O_ 0. o o O. Q_ Q o a. O n p) Q Q Q O_ o Q 0. o �. y C 0 0 0 0 O m O0 0 - V) V, a r+• N CD CD N D) S .. DCM0.) Q Q Q O_ 0 3 Q) O_ Q. 3 v 0) N T D) 0) O rt rt rnr en-' Iv '< K rn_r r) n <' <' < < < 0 3 < < c ri rr. r+ rr. :-r 3 ft M 74:. ro -altoric N (AN N 0 n• V)i corm n x 3 c v, a r+ -, C CD a 3 •2 o7 d (D m 3 a < —N rtA CO d. m YLJ m 5' rt —hcr, m M O 3 S N a m _ �. a fD O 0 v, o CD7C N ?a T 3iD I D m f n ft m <-mo to to ' -0 X - -O p. p) m U� -' k . ; U"I as x ^ O'3 N O 0 \ a ' ., N U J L Y. /�1o)to .P., ti � `A) N n.,, c„:, n -. r ( v ,•,..5 n r Cl) S2o m ,;2. —. . .1 1 • p m : T :0......_rim.r.D' -!Dy• :. (D yv : r N � 'D CD n n, n Cl) co. n• 11 0 n OOo • (sit, 11 Do . � �+ m m : : Oo Oo : : c Co (D co ao 04 n n n > n Cl) D <.<8 C 6m Q m r-F rn O-8 N N A (i) CAC September 11,2014 VII-6 Staff Reports 1 of 4 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project FDEP Meeting August 6, 2014 Meeting Notes Attendees: FDEP — Bob Brantly, Chiu Cheng, Tom Jacobs, Subarna Malakar, Vince George, Jennifer Coor, Jennifer Peterson, Brendan Biggs, Vladimir Kosmynin FWC— Luke Davis (on phone) Collier County —Gary McAlpin CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. —Tom Pierro, Lauren Floyd, Tara Brenner(and Steve Keehn on phone) Agenda: See attached meeting agenda Collier County and CB&I presented the proposed plan for the 15 yr permit. This would include the same project template (fill area), but would include the following improvements: • Flexible project size (routine smaller, incremental placement on one segment each year with the option of larger projects if needed) • Flexible sand source (Borrow Area T1, upland sand sources, sand from maintenance dredging of Doctors Pass and possibly a new borrow area at Cape Romano) • Address sea level change with slight increase in berm elevation • Possibly seek mixing zone variance for truck haul fill placement area • Combine Collier's beach nourishment and Doctors Pass maintenance dredging into one permit. Collier County seeks to obtain this permit by January 12, 2015 (before the current beach nourishment permit expires) so that there is no time gap between permits. The purpose of this pre-application meeting was to present the proposed plan and to obtain feedback from FDEP on the feasibility of this plan. Based on information and comments received, Collier County will decide whether to include all of these elements in their JCP application or to modify their proposed project. CAC September 11,2014 VII-6 Staff Reports 2 of 4 Comments/Discussion For clarity, these comments are organized by topic, and are not necessarily presented in the order they were discussed. Cape Romano • This potential borrow area would be used for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project, but is not requested for the South Marco project (which would still use Caxambas Pass or truck haul) • The finer sand in Cape Romano is similar to Doctors Pass sand, which has performed well • An ETOF analysis will be needed for Cape Romano sand to address concerns about potential impacts to nearshore hard bottom • The County's justification for proposing the Cape Rom ano Borrow Area would be to increase their flexibility in sand source and construction method (this borrow area could be dredged using barge and scows). Recent experience showed that use of Borrow Area T1 was not feasible due to high cost, therefore Collier Co. would like to have more options at their disposal to respond to their project needs. If the County moves forward in permitting the Cape Romano Borrow Area they will make this justification clear in the permit application. • If we propose this borrow area, we should provide results of previous investigations which show there is no seagrass or hardbottom • A public easement will be required for this borrow area • We need to show cores 2 ft beyond the maximum dredge depth with 80% recovery and provide composite tables Sea Level Rise • An ETOF analysis will be needed for the increased berm elevation to address concerns about potential impacts to nearshore hardbottom • The project includes a stepped berm — it may make sense to only put the additional sand on the upper berm to minimize/avoid hardbottom impacts • Potential concerns over the increased wave energy • FDEP would like to see a local sea level rise analysis similar to what was done for the Captiva permit application. Doctors Pass • There were no major concerns with combining the Doctors Pass maintenance dredging in the beach nourishment permit • FDEP would like to see whatever records the County has of the pass material being beach compatible • Sampling of the inlet sand may be required as a NT P item before it can be placed on the beach CAC September 11,2014 VII-6 Staff Reports 3 of 4 Mixing Zone Variance • New FDEP rule allows FDEP to grant up to 1000 m radius from point of discharge based on need and presence of natural resources • The County does not foresee a need for expanding the offshore distance of the mixing zone beyond 150 m, so there will be no concerns over hardbottom impacts • The County will review past turbidity experience to see where water quality compliance was difficult and will use this data to support a mixing zone request (alongshore, not cross shore) • FDEP confirmed that the point of discharge in a truck haul project may be hundreds of feet along shore and that m ixing zone distances should be measured from the downdrift edge of the construction area. Expedited Permitting • The fundamental question is whether this fits the "repeat project" criteria • The County should provide a clear"fill material placement protocol"that shows how much (maximum) volume will be placed on each segment and at what frequency. FDEP must have this information to understand the effects of the proposed action —the C ounty can always opt to construct less than what is permitted. Additional Comments • Before submitting the permit application we should coordinate with FDEP biologists to discuss possibility of modifying the monitoring protocol/schedule to align w ith the proposed routine (incremental) placement of fill on only a single beach segment each year. • We will need to provide separate QA/QC plans for offshore borrow areas and upland sand sources, and possibly a third plan for Doctors Pass Collier County appreciates the comments received and will take them into consideration as they move forward with their permit application. CAC September 11,2014 VII-6 Staff Reports 4 of 4 Collier County Beach Renourishment Project— 15 Year Permit FDEP JCP Pre-Application Meeting Wednesday,August 6,2014 1:00 PM Meeting Agenda • Welcome, Introductions • Goal and Purpose of Project o Permit a comprehensive renourishment program for multiple events under a 15 year permit authorization o Provide Collier County with the flexibility to respond to routine or emergency nourishment needs using offshore borrow areas (T1 and Cape Romano) dredging of Doctors Pass and/or upland sand sources • Project History o Project Location o Sand sources o Volume o Construction methods o Natural resources and environmental considerations • Future Collier County Beach Nourishment o Aspects which remain unchanged • Fill placement area • Borrow Area T1 (federal waters) • Upland sand sources • Hydraulic (hopper or cutterhead) and truck haul methodologies • Continue with FDEP-approved biological monitoring plan o Proposed changes: • Utilize Doctors Pass sand source • Utilize Cape Romano sand source • Address sea level rise (increased berm elevations) • Mixing zone variance for truck haul • FDEP Guidance on 15 Year Permit Application o Essentially a repeat project(plus Doctors Pass and Cape Romano) o Application procedure/requirements N J Csj 0oV CV ca."5 E`4V ' u� cn U cil U .z 4.1 E c5., EIC Z °6 VI uT::. ; •—Ls :' Z a C E a , W L o rI a s ce a, 7, o E v _ ... N 2 ,, a -ozs 'I ' '', (,) s.. AN CO Ln U Z L M7P3t r 4.41 r1 : _ Q v m a O ea . V '- z Q) a `�� -. 4.¢ , 41 O `` , , VW I.. .. •Z 117' CS J H on5:2o C ! v N - �. ... 45 co N Cl (1) COU Q 0 0 .4--' E E CO 1-1 a) o N N N co .1-i t1A CL Q iC E •- O 2 a v' E v, > U �- o v, '� 0o al a) N C a � = CT z, C _c co o C � Q �- �' (133 a .c-iiE O O .a1 ._, U dA N N Q N O i O N cn O fDuE -O N v) `^ a L- a 0 ?, +-, C H o U a N c (D a) a) Z 4_,r O 2 tin U = N N �J +.1,_ C v) ca >- a) t C O O v a) ro Q CO .� a N Q CO O 41 co v, rl v — N o O a- W + _ o on v , a) -O = - a ii m mD a g o a cu C .- 2. ,_ CO N 0 ca U U v., . . . C U — a +-1 Q a "0 w d Q X s0 a z I i i i . . . . • U „ ,,,.. .. . - : ,,- , ..‘,,,, 4_, 111! x•'-', f -., ' k .., •,4 . , I, Nd O 'J■� co • co _ ^ N T O cO s -0 vi > °L sr) N N Qc c = c Q. a) U (13tZD O ,-, a c N •N c C ;..i v a) = a) c� d- s E E E a U c-I _c OL- = 4- O F O 4- 0 E •— CD N O 17.3 CD C tip -o d Q• c a) 0O co L- O D C U 0. ..-.. 0 LA a L = C = O O a) N O CI) c O (NJ C c Eco c ^ a) .N cn s? 1v— , 4- '� 0 N -0 o o o c c 0 CU a) c , co C c c� .a •�„ D c E cu L v ``' °Q L a) a) a, O E •� E a 11 ° U N 73 cUa a) Q CU aD 0 s_ OD a O u '� o — 3 -c a - ° ca ID c n a — a) •—' N `= .0 Q) L '{”' '- O O o L C 0 _ct E — °; L +a- a O °- E >- a ° cu L o .w o 2 m) c� ;►� O •Ln 'i > CD 03 > a) a) >co — a) o o v a a) .. c6 a C ca 0 v a) x _ L O a1 Q Q 4-° 1— to lD o cg Q u_ Z MIa C I I I I I Ia. C.) ,_ 4 cu m CI_ T C '2 \ 0 W 'Q \ O S— v O U Lri 0 o o Q N 0 z 7.5 0 N a N 'O co N CU N p N cin T-1 vs L) Y c-I N v o O Q N '0 C 00 N C co O — Q 1% 0 2 X --Z v o O C a C 1— C -0 a n 73 ca 1 N 4--) Lf) CO (0 C ' r •C co N No a oo .12 O M O 0 0 O .i Ln 0v_i = p 4 0 � M N 0 bA E U N N w O N —, N Q 2 c _', 03 m Ln Q z N ca r--I -a C N cn rl -D v O O• C O O N � c6 p z z co C O N z Q O m z �, _ 'co z N 3 11, E c s- NN Q co N v •Q c Q N CL. W O m a. cn w W O o CL v U 0 U w ' < 0 • i LU QD � U �' U0 I I 0 1 I 0 MI C.) • ■ ■ '' L-' ''' ' - 4,- , L .-H4, ; - ..,..i 1,.... N at O +J �� N Cti _.� m(0 ^ iv c u' U2 ago v a) 0 i CID N 0 •� m N CU C N C D_ a..i < N +_+ COL. i +.+ m O ^ O c 6 O z � i- OD Toau .— c L Ou +j N E aA E L N ..0 V) N U — a--+ 0 Q - N — Coi 'i fB i} CO `� fB CO Q C > I- v U > >. N 10 U ? = CI) c 0 c CO 0 0 0 a) ca "D 0 {= "• aj O 3 a) 0 O O to t a o o Cn ao Ce - o X rn L 0 a) u X I (N! 0 Q cvn I oN 0 °'ty.i O m 71 M d. -� i a) m CO r-I CO m M CD CO CO — e-1 Z M N + v 1± M 2 01 O OI I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 I I I ■ ■ ■ w �2 Z ( ) - - ,/ O 0 o g,fl.11 W Z It f �! V Wl0. W� ' W U i .re C Sw // a a �+ aN r ',- �tle 30Y0 — N cg Z_ Illeiri 5 5l _ ��<' 8 0< &$ w c7o'se ' o - Wp 000w,3 ffi E Z i come,3 c `,t W Y. �'70/ VJ II,,111 Q . OmCU 4 C�� 1 II �, i O W w m IL til . • \��\�� TAU > a _Imp. _�- I o S �• w�e _ low y u # 4., U w ,, MOUE l I- poW y Z a N OLit 2 W� 0. W U /�O I'I J 0. Q ❑V1 WO , W m r/ ,� It I-- a �•$ C Z m ¢Z a (W a q a �/ � pkovvvv1 W i0. Ya --ZO U y� F u~N� O Q 2 -w- I cv d i E g Pa ga / Zm�'in'~' MI 1 q I IIII LL 0LL ho.-* a & a0 n w Z? 0.N { Z °— naxsr,i 8m D� I ti A j N1 Zu 4 — N Z i Z 4J 0. II }1 , i + k, E „S.1- -F7 CI 0 EP f 1., A N B .nom 5 -a —c3 N L C Q co `v _ N C a) � ^ DC M �u F 03 z I I C i Lim. 4•I CU r'e—I 0 > V) = }' ` ) a� v a� a - Q ” Vit. ; i. W . 1y L . ran` ., . i 1 , 4, L 0 i) �� N tL, (13 O k '4 - , `4 co a) � 'la.. �E al ' Z 4-+ L N O C 4 cu N O C '; x. Cl) 4.4— 5... CD to sv. W gx a s- 0 T >. — CD E 0 N > PIIIIIIIPr. ; O 4-, L O — v) 4-' 0 O Cl) L F C j -L ca r-1 Cl) '0 �. Q) O 0 4- 4-.1 ca L C O O C ,; 0 0 — Q C C• O � N U fa L L N V) O 1 a O O 72 Z CC Q J (/) LI) U , # # 1 ., I E , I , , r _ \ . , 1 , ,I < Z tn c\l't 0 # , t / - CD r, 4...; 1 ,z 111111 . .._ 0 m 0 _r) E (0 CA a.) ''''." CD ra L. a) .i..... co < o o > .- u .- 73 -0 42., a) v) CU -C3 iii ...c E 0 1- CO CO +a 0 t.) 4-) o 3 ........ c 44- (/) 0 CU 4-i 0.. U C CO 11 al a) _ a) s_. 0 c a) d u tio o 4-j C VI IA C C •— a) .._ (15 co ..c . cu -0 -0 WL. .- s_ .... •_ 4_, L- z = 0 = 4-) •*- (r) = 0 a) I &.- 0 U ...---. ;.47- 0 'A 4-) 4-) 4-0 — CU $ a) ftli ro s_ I 4-d - Z U 1 co CIO 73 c -6_ > 0.) txo _c ° " v) 'a C .- 1 ,a., cu Cl) 0 'i-_- ro V) 41) 0 Clkm t ...... cu ric a) ro tip " mc° tin ci. 0_ L. s-.44 U - .4--,c co a. m co L._ ol 0 0 , .-' ,c: 7 r-lLf1 -2 WI (1: .11 r---1 ..T-ICD• I I v) Cl) CC • .t - i , - -., . ,.• , .. . .. +•,, , . .,,! - 1 ,:, 0. ., ..... .. i ... .•. • -0 . .._ 4 tuse 103 ,,,,P,,R.,:: r lip; f -. ° , , .4 , , , .. . .,, t,. . .„, , , -,„ .,...-c ,i. .• — Sill gpi alit 4,..,i -.4. I ....,-- . ; ,.....-_, t„ -...,.. . , - •IL t . :.,): -1 4-. . _ . = !4.."_,.... a r 441 .4 . • ..- 52311 kiP t• , 1 zs,, : .,, ),.., z Z ill'ir. ilg Pi !IF,I,''', t *---- - ' ' " t ik-.. ._ 0 I 4,„ •" 1.. ? 4,-f.. ' 4 1 i ' ' i'-; 4 '91 ig? liatiblo2 - 4: .,,,p;s: t-• - .t. t,' ..-,,, ' ,,,ieott-.4-4; k, - - - -I' .' -,;..f•i. Allf 1' 1 1 i F,gbig ...,,— ,- i.• •, ' • , • .., . • $ ' ,- #' 1-t:'' lin 14 - -- • '1111,07r, -• . , ".. -', ' , , t'. I „„ (1 4- i « 1 I • 4 •*•i 1 .• ) .), ,, 1 ,.. 1 ° ,, 1 ti' _--- --- - --....-,../•'''''' * 4 • ,# .4 • _-_•:::Art. I , ,., , . • , , '''''' ...4"- ; ei -- -„.-,---.7,-,„tv ,,--, 7-f--\-- ' 4,?.,, ,4,4114,;y4,. ,-., ' .- 1 Api-f`—')'•;> -, 4."... /7, Q Lc"„3 -'-• ., .. \ if \ <,. \ • \ \ onwir,"' .suma CCIII (1) \ti \ I I I Is 4/—�� .�, r 2A. y4 E, E N W ! _ `z„ e ...A.4. „ Y N N > a) L ....•` cr) 0L V O Z N 13 Q L 0 N $ ln L > 0 NO N N 0 (/) i U _C e-i N O 0 •L to L co co— i `� _N -O O O v U co E a O vai o 0 CO E -Q Cil o 4- N OI) a, C o 2CU E a) 0 CO E 0 N O — L tin O CA Ca- -0 +a C s _ 0 M O L V ‘11d' CD O 0 ri s m O m m D 4--J ■ ■ ■mit ■ •■ • (13 Z. 8.w o o Q o 0a� mi w / s o. O rl ,�° pip[___,....,I ,, .,L4,2r y !!QQ a a a N p' 30Y4 g.Z c7 O O 5 z o u¢ , 4 z _ _ �a 11% Z fl) , g • �3 tu f. rot 0111 fes-:.' • 11 JQ kLi 1 C7CONE J 1 y o az $ El *0d < w w 6 Z Huh: WQ iHi ie —,...r, 01OAnt cg6g, aG II w pi< Uma.wOu dWII , CH f W ji_ A 4 02 f O O • 4– � t -r- .r - . N 0.'5 .44. N ' N .. u) E co a, ' V) > Cr) L o CU Q i ttO a..+ O 4) O co .- — N N N = s— O 0 v) 0 O N p_ A N 1.- C) O O RS N O - ..O > O coo E ,- U O 4 O +-' v) CU I N t aA >. vv ) O -0 a5 c - a z � CL (1) " � ° v O < O t1A vi U 1 U U _ U I 0 aA s a-'0 c - aCO > -�a. N Cl) a c C O C — = ' ° a.) d' 's= N O Lt) co co a)co Q 0 `� O m CO CY) C7 O� S Cl. O_ +I 1..1 O O I I I I I z o CD ■ ■ ■ a--J1 5 I1I1flu1! . rnt7cn FlRi - .w.. y, s :; ' w ' A. .,' .,, - a ! . a ii 4'Y 0.:.i. '. '� • . . a Y j 'I :fir 14:t'"‘*-' I -b'k d• a 1 Y e 'v d • \ 1 ►IMO--' 1\ V � I ism -------- , �//�� ,}'r. #�,a .�" 3*K .,,• , gip. O co ,‘,.. , ; ... N dO a #x;. _NI , , , }... , ,t...i. f :ii co ,„, 1 ., ,, . N SI U I O 4_, cO co N L }_, o O N 4-. U L. CU L -c CO UO I- i O C 0 N ra c LiJ cJi CO '� CD s— CU a) a) a 7.-) . •` N z -0 3 E CD co Z a Z c) .� ax. I I L D .N ■ .-_ _ ■ ■ oil "Z. ..1.4t,.,w,t,....tili: '2 t i �` W,NN 4 n Y� 0 9 Y 7,. s _:: ..7. /le . iilt ;e: W } •Q h1/1it,: 1 1 W� W It •12 N I . -*. it -�8 '.7. 4'y_ ' .1# �M' x N �N.... N + t t tin to ea to Po (;:ii � ..ea 1.}�0, .3'. a 0101 a, hill cf, ;till t a.m. ' 1,.t x 3 X s. 0 to`" r $ a 0 1 a �G,��.s a z • +s6 z 4 �p ��C‘ cn W W io01W tr,OW Rit OW ;.. CO) G\‘kOt O O U O U U >U �jrpF+ 1 k QO QQ QQ 444, .4 Z4( "04 U WQ "` ^ E. Z3o Zo �W3oo 3 3' LL NcoQ OQ M WQ .- Q WQ + cG coo + to - PCZ , I In I + Z U ' 1 b Z O + M .- Mj1 !4 . z : QOW ° Z-UUWr ZVWU� d, zt -0W Spop� UpOzo z s, 1M0 UM 'ImMfl� : . , AzC ` Ct OWO n O y1040 ZUWMUWb yy ZcaW+ ZW O ZW .A Lik ^ QCCCyQomDt D to+ oWOOO OW OZOWQ # WzWt 44 S (1) `^ r W a <f N O O N 'I . 4 ', N .<17) 0 H AV N • 0 10,11 (n Ni CU •�.it yx CU M. ,./, : • .:s. U .r-; O `^ z � � CC 4-1 (73 V; 0 t CO a) a a) 0 > t./) 3 U N 4_, 0 l.L CO v a-' v) sr)U I 0 Z Zr, elk) Z 13C CIO 03 -C3 O U Z i Za) N O N cv N -- c.,!) c — aJ +' N • C e-I O cB •Q. " C co O c2.. v) o 0 U Q a) ) N 0 U CO S- t]A O U p v) C U O C3 E5- O O p OL Ca) 3 CO • J° CO a -6 oa +-' 4- sCL _m. N Ovz a) a)L _ COQ o 3 `�' o +�U a t v o a , N U a) Z a CO v C a �° 40 w L s vo o v z ,+.. C o N C Z U O O O u- C }' >- Cr) O aJ c6 = C C O m a) -0r✓ a) O ca O N >- O. >` Q s O U L -p f° N O a) V e (tttr t•-••••••.„ -.• 1, -- 11 I V) CU lip :,AC, tt , 14 < NI c0 'cr - t N cS 0 r- -4-) 1 . , N O. 0 Sr.. - CU (NI 1 2t- ,- CC ,-- D , d' — 'a m I— p 4-, a) ro 0 cu _ +a o Lf) Ct3 = c 2 -0 z .— cl. I _ u'- ......... ._ u E I u.. cu _C 0 = •t-29 ----- 4-, ci) (, , (1-) tA > im U (-7c 4-, ...-.... .4_, •4-1 o ...._, co Q) co CI) U _0 . _a 4-- 0 l.0 °- r•••• co a) .4-1 N -o I N c na o CJ CNI E (NI CI_ ,.7: Ct. c CD , _J co I sr) s..) ro _i CU M ........, .— 0 %.., u_ — I.L., 0 co rzt. u -I titt+ 4...t (/) km"' -- 1 0 1 0 -- - CU 0 > Ii 0I 1 U s.... aj 1.... V) :1-"' 0 4-, Cl) 0 4-i, (9 0 CU *4:: t-i (9 0 -----• CU (..) I 13 13 (..9 in) 9 0 C CC. -0 6 1.- s,... (. (J) CO co 0 0 Cri 0 0 I rb e-1 CI) -J 0- —I 4-• -•-•"' ....---. 1.- L.. = ,,,s • (J) C =M I I tio a) NI n rri -0 CO 0 r'l • -J CL r-i • z 41 'IC,t, ittit- it*tii/ t• '4.-t • '.'nail% . • ' h A -,Th i ).,. ic.vzartatax8erg" .ta • ',QS ...... _it , ..,(.4...v. .... , 1 : - -Vrvi 4.:, .1., f - , • •, *, .rit.,;* ' YA .. . . „.....r 7'—'11c,19., , ",;.41,... .. •is.,-- . a. 4 ,V\ r,),L.k.1)—i ,-.. t.k is-.0--- ., • .•i kl„:_) .. , -I ; • t , , ' • • .- • .--_-_.i , -, -. -'.' — , ,i. 4.-. 8-1, ''.... st,I , _ - .........1,. Tr r,Lskii--- - »-ari-:"."'-'4*-1r: "'"*' 1-;(4 IP.".4';1 ...42".•:" )4. : A 4 ,.. 1 s "t.ill- P ; !.,',',-', ,,,,,:,'*, ' 1,,, 7 4tata .• II . ___,I .. , vAarearit . t waill:41-iiiiidlaii ,1111r,--pii,L.1 --.9 i i, ft z.-,-.k.s.patireers.,!721=,Ittr, 8.-..„ r-;-:0:.'.',1''' •- 1 k ...,, " . %kJ..t.„ „•- , , - i 'Li ' ,OL,4114 11__., ,,411011k - 0,.--,t,;_,,, ., , ti. ' - 4 — f. .. * V• ' i 6 Nr jki I_ aidu.,f1,.'..0", : :'''NA• -,E. •- - — • 41r.r.:.T••• r... '_ -— ii, , t ., .',, it. - • •• 4 7:**"` 4, r sr. - . "46--., ,i,-; rf, ''..- - t .. \ .." . '-‘.' .T" ' ' .' '. -1 l' 'V 41 ' ''' -•'. r lei 2- .,.... ... — ", tafai‘ ',wt.,- ...4--,411, - - p , It: v.- • t.. . , ...44 la • ___ A.11 .44 Set,--1 4-,.1 t11,116„......, „,, ...ale. , - ,, ... '. ,,,_ % .1 4 * * - . i 10" .00 st, 0, IT, ...--„'"" ir•- `," -. t . _ -. , , ,..;,i), 'LI, *S'4* ,Aeff"ko Z' ''' `,...g I ; ''''1:16ft • ..'- • V I .' -1 — t.'i .._,,,,,, ,...,,,.. ....„. ,,,,,,,,,,, 4,........, . , „, ,•,..s .. ,,. , — tir . , ...!'V •' •.- ...47-rr 0,- .;. . "I'" r°•,1'''30-.4;:*.' •;;Or....• ' ,. -..' ''' i ....4,- *-- ' --, '' •,. • .,.,' •AiI, --1 . :1, 7."' ' '•-c- d.ItC'' '1'4 4i Thi ': '"or''' ,,:. -'i ': - 1.-t-•-• ?„1.)A ,,,i-..,,,, -,--,zr fr.:1, •I: : ,:ru,' tg-a,.. . ' , , . .,,,,, -116,744.‘ ‘ ' ' ' -I• d.- - :1. ,' *,.:',u.'ArT...,- •I' ' - ., .• -., moleft*.-- ....,-..Arr' ' 2 i , ,r`- ‘... , ___ .„.i 1, ri,..,r4,.........0 ..a* ____-10 -6-eL _ ,...,sm__._.______--;-------------. -,-„, n 1 I 9. ,,..8, cL : ''• 41-- i_z.-13-1-tl;---' •sz,. -- 0 ------------ Owirc ---- t- - c‘i m m 2.1 cf)ur II. Z Z 0 I:2 0 0 LI) : v) A , 4'. ,� � � 0 ()a. NO O w +� 4: '" • t r L Cf) U r'r c 4,00 U L F pa V) 0 ill") I L k . ilt 4-) .��aass ra N Q) :~ - Q� (n I CO (p O co E co u1 0 > .- N Q +-+ +.+ X O a incu , 0 = o U _ (n co _� V N o_ N i Q- N c4 U CU V1 > i 0 13.0Oa) CO O O u c U CD +-+ O a LL O u tO L a) a) O N c ON c N 6 Q _0 U a) 4.., — f6 Q d O -- > 0 O CO v QJ U co 7 04-, O co O }, TA% 'C co r- -0 O 4 O O c O' a) C N f0 LL. O Y C O QJ -Y co J -0 Z •i s_ I �CO U N t1A 41 O ff.+ -0 N , O p c "a c _ •� 73 r OO (TS 0 CO C d CO O +-, O a c `n d 0 (/) L to OC0 N N v1 0 Crr- C0 O O •C U) -t3 LL -a = C `6 ° = a) {0,, O- C cn 1- ,.0 O O - , c C — w •on I C O vbA ca v, > +� c c c i p 0 c u ' 3 a. O .C--,.., > 10 cn Q1 0- `-• -C vi t i i O O O O c � X � � L � O v) 4-4 — O — O Q . c 4A cn +-+ 4A CO a- O- • L._ CO U bO C E 2 ." u a 2 a OS U oO r.C.1 cuZ I I I a I I I L./ ■ ■ ,—.... ,'.,.4, .),*-i: '`!:;c"`• "-II. "?,°1' ' ' '' . ... '.,, s 0-';',-.';',. - . le .., . . , . , ,...- .:,.. ''',:i' l3 _• , ''''' ;T .75 E___" C•;•--- , ., . .,„ , . ..„ . , ...,-., - , 04 0_0 el,' , . , — CD '''I :;.". - - cc •cr ... , . ' . .,. , .....„ ..,_. . . -,......*..,,,,- ..: - , - . . ti, co MI 'It t u) Lff) 0 a) '9 c 9,,,,,,,,.; ..M.f 13X) eL- a) ' _.0 c • - _ co V) I UN a aj 0 cp > tap 0 0 0 •4-' ,,co kF:•.',.-4-) 4-0 n4- ro (13 C CD I ..-- cu _c +-, . 1 ietli 40,4,'- E 0 ID L.) cz U co t.r) (1) v) -o -0 tio CIA Cl..) -0 .- — i*:1;:41 i 511 I -0 a) " to 0 co CO +-I CU • CO ' i) > - -0 LU 0 s-. C 0 Joie 0 Cll cu 4-1 44- CO ...."•••• CN 0 CO -0 -0 0 -- c-i C NAr ;4: - a v) 4= CDC Afi. OCD 0 L9 E b..0 cuLno 02 0 r° 4.j V) V) " CU U 73 s_ 0 C c 4-, C -rs C 4-= 4.4 4-I —*-- CD _ "7:5 U), - 0 CU 4.) V) C tlA . ,Atif44, CU m (13 CD >. 0 s- co = 4 5... L- 0 73 4.-° C 0 "C3 , '• U C — a) _c tz ..c i__ co 5._ 4- co , >- e- V) V) v) a) s,k0t, = a3 4-jc VI CU 73 1 T.3 (1) c a. 2.) 4-0 0- 4's I0 III - •,-..„. — ._ 0 U — — 4-, co co — _ L._ ..c = co •. . V) cr E _ — v) 0 CU -C u... (-) OD -0 .- 0 b.0 D _C — W C CO 4CD - C 04-' c D 2 ‹t< C o c o — .– C o CO co a) ,C75 CU CU ._0 03 cu Z 73 w " " = •--• < = tu3 7:',":. ..';', . ,. a) ._ co co 73 > a.) 0 c '0'.','' a) 2 4-, , Ln w tio co -055 w 5‹ 13 v' ,r-i aj C -a u L-• c - •--- ..0 F- c 0 a) so O •- a) 0 a) a) 0 CO NI s,_, — In ..0 C 1- ie 73 V) " .4-' ',= 0- > V) 03 t 13 , , CU -C 4: *- 4-+ "I-t-% (I.) — %- (1) -N 76 (T) 7-- -' Li.) (.0 i 1_ C .... u V) = CU () , 13 a) a) 4- C C QC a. (-0- E = - (0 -w cu o 0 4-, 4-, ..– Ln V) L- _C -C (13 o o -- u v) .v) v) co 0 L) _., .t_-' 4-, a) (7, ' ,:, u _o co 0 a (-) '-' - — 2 2 CD o ..c cf.) (-) 4._ a) 22 co 0 L.... u I o 0 o co ro _c o c.L ....... 0 z c z E \i,..1 • • • • • • ..`n rr ' k s V ,I- �; a a- y OI C N L1 0 . ^t W.N • i? (r) 5:2.. 0 m> L co O CO— 3 m U o _U 4 p O pA U N .b O E co O .to C CUa _0 O a) z .(0 E 4- L N Q. co C C Ca 0.0N ..0 Z C N •� co :~' to 0 co CO L s = U C/') I— -0 Q. e-i N O v) -- .0 C Q � v 3 0 z4-:-- a) a) C - Nft3 03 1— i vii C, cfi C U O v► = -' a) 5 co O CO +i., _C 0 o -0 u- -a �_� c o cn C 0 0 N co 0O U +J IY co . v a; 4 -O ca N o +, O v, O L -� N C ch m v 3 N •4-, +� cn m v, ca 3 2 a = � Z .� co c o I > 4-, b Z `�c a. O o CD No a_+ C f�) O C ate--+ •— -C OAC `+ >.. U Q to v1 a) CU O L C Q A co N C C C4_, a a) O m co a) •— O L, C S2 V) -0 > CD p s' Q c_n co O"W E O a co a_'' a)0 0c/) L .4-4O a•-+ N +� v a) a) C 4-0U m N "0 4--J - �, ( C 0 •Ca (11 ° 4-1C o C O v) E o 0 0 Q C C C O a a✓ •C o CU :175 ,, CO m }, v -_ m Cl) +a) c C C wry) (pro Ca) t — `—I 117'O l)Vm 0 rn = •• UC -0 0UNCv, -8 § C O U C O +-' C a) -0 10 N U ( ) v OQ 73 a 3 a) ED 0 a) U 3 O C a) 73 _� U Q. U 0 ULn o a) v` ,, o u = a O OU r-i+-+ O U Q o Q O Uco < N U a Q - u0. C U co c vs v cn Q• I I I I CO I I I I D Qm Q w...- v) . . z • . CQ D Z UI I O O L 1 N O O � 0 y aw- cz 0_ NL O in ^�^'' to U Wc U >-d • A Ln - v v -O r-I c6 O E _y 2 C V) 7.a) a--) _ O •N ^U' c a ) W 4— co •-1 0 v) Q C v ri L 0 O I u -c M N O o N D o -0 U .3 C D o -a CD LL -, Co v C O aA au� >- v C Q) o a c NO 0 v) v a1 �O o - C Ln v) 4-a .– co 4- Q.) a W C = iii O U) CV C v a) •� 4-I co a) 0 a-+ C L ;�' CU fC a •X C SZ 41 cu N N > V a) O c > O N N O i O Q w C \ IZ N i f0 .- = f� u O u Q ON N E C6 - tu , OO ? Q N N u "O fo TO O ca 4.... C N C O O E � N r-I fQ aJ +' = O '+_ .L cv pi, a) O' i O V) a) I— E L_ E C N c en c N v, Ln v v*''i O Q CD N -C +-+ L v O O N ). i _ •4-_-, LJ CD C _ 2 _ = Q D o L ) i 2 2 E o o -0 .� i v T 0 i I i i I I 0 0 Q co 0 -3 oc 2 o m o D a a _ Q E O • Q • • • cu U 0......, I I I I ili I 1 !; 0 I t r .0 1 nco� ca a D n n N c M Q a) o C M cc c > L - C6 p OC 2O �O 01 co 00 '� tIa 0 to M ryj CC O aJ to co v - _ca NOC 11. O p •_C v� a, CD co N W L Jo la= (t) -7:3L co -c 0n - — •3 u) = = a E N c '� L Q, Q. O 4= U N f0 N N L CO CL (13 CO tri a) Q. +.+ O z i O s1:8 c I 4., o Q o_a) I I I I cn O C7 Ov U se c c D 1 V^/ 4-0 ■ •■ • ■ • ■ U W J O gra g§ g z< A s i _ z z 0 O $ J __..- l- w a" u L_ yy. ! .'• 30Y0 = y o OJ g •tee °1 a--) 5 c>a - 1 25 4d"03r \-O�7 G Oj o L N > Wilk I d )- a t‘'" .. p., ZW Wm s ' {�� y 1�U limit ________ •- , y c.� ti> > v4. W -- § 1. m R $ CS} it 1 J yj O O N W P a m ♦ !1 2 eJ CC QQ vr' i �d z ° a ( ♦ I o Z 0 °v M �O 7N O W y < < LLti/ t aL4 / � og ° �zsza d , a �s r d U �r�y, NQS�F �¢ v�0 ¢og ;:. j4d CGZ §n C °" Wz0pOr Z x p, —..___.____fid a Fi a O a.O u o w,3 7- y _ prw� r - Obnf9Cl 4 O n n O< �<N 1 uIfl I I 0 , ® (/j V a 6 W C�. ® d W Ii C ; z z ¢@ J ' t I Vi • O 0.1 a 0 V/1 1 /TT '° , `05m c .0 c Q aai C° C a5 U N U > N .0 �c N u 0 an " ca c CoD O O a) a co � o 0 on .� m oE N CO v 1-1N .� N O o N m 2 z an = o h (13 co c-I UJ -0 CD U O O 'a O en Cl.) Q O N m N '0 N on O I._ v1 O s a s o 3 .- `�' •- c� "' 4-, •- 4- ;� 73 N o E c cn > c o I . ^ CO o - c a (...9 (1) 0- a� O c, m Q o Q V) L H cn o a. oM c OM o um >o CU 2 Q vi 4-1 —' - '5.1 o t. A e - /l _L w .! . r�, t , b rW .z a yz /.. t 0^W' ¢ h >m K / ^p LL W .7 3l'� r 4 +L 0 ,.....),' r_----,-,— a '.gj II jwk i 6"`YwW.t. mz f cn N V2 141I t".*' k Irj �a I o U ./-,-co r' • % .9O. / O Z �` �,. `-.^ tucc) Q a° / W , _ _8 S 4%„ p,� N N U s K:3 a. 4 I nom' � ' a '' V N `/ U 1 . �yo a ( E aai >co E U U c t11 .. , CO 4— •— c Cc M Q N-cs a G c C.� f (� p o v, C! , , , ms L L. Q� O N d 1 +- °' N N v Q- m o E cnE ,4 , a� co o -. c w c `° h U acn c- 3 CO -Cr- E L c N t-1 ate.+ CU = w '' fp •F, 0— i Cl, v c cn > u v N in U c°n N Q a.) o � o I I I x co 11 I I a v) m N w v) 1 V) ) 4J ■ ■ ■ • U N O 5 u. 1 1 j" '0 E y q () L 1 N _I �(� 11W Cl_ L'. ) GJ ,5 I1 E °c K I/ , ¢ r a v {��{��LL. ui 6w P E c CP 1,2),,,, ,i 2 3 , 1 0 '1 1 '1:11.,t L.l_ +cC411). * ,ti, m ti E W:".!: 5o c7 •7 1 .f=W 1 Y ,5� . a .5 yy r. v V a_ 13-i---: CU 7 J i U° ZO ---4 -:1 j CL m U ea N O , , µ i� QO. .ti 1 ' \J �no �} C c 0....., 1t = { , N 2 r. Lii) 2 N ,:1 Y4: � a w 4, I)v.. . .c, t„..0 i2 1 N * „.., ( ,., , ,\. N O C p y O Y Q; U U Q ^W, U 0 a. O ^L c E O I Z an O O 73 D v) CO LL eto L_ _ -0 > CU Q W D Q CO co o v) C N L O co 0 .4--+ 13 i v) co d O •N L o E C- Oo L ��, CO O Q L_ _C 0 c N Q L W E 0 O •L- U C1- U — ow.- • • • U t" F W 13 Lc) V/ Y,' 44- , %4F w TT f, s7 $, n V • N d O hf1 , N C ' �.' 1 f f0 av) (13 a£icD Q d — P UJ ° ' ' V Q 1..., U N L L O .I– 0 ",,,,, ,, LL q, i 4, . a �' `� > a, CO O N O I 4.,t (n c}. C O p N kD + 1_ i' ' Or 1 Q = 0Q .- ac 00 ,� �n # 4z do' v o ° cc 014 as 3' O 0 +_ •Ln Q �, o cu o N O p ps � M X 'p O '— " cn a �, 0 4_, N W aJ w 1.1... L —C i 0 sb' (I) NJ O- O N C 1 0 v +-+ w 0 3 g ,8 ,,,g i '6 ) 11 U_ N 4.z ( Z 1111 a. tl 2 Q 0 O I, 3° J �yJ .0 ;ij a N �/8 •L18 30tlO Z N IIIMP 4 i 4 /O/ 2 J�a'� O Q f wcr ¢ S 060 6 � ' a J wo O 000eo+a 1 1 000cm 3 JU U j..-.AAA r a a W rn H LU J f.. Vl 11.-j �., t•.. I a X11! Z *III 1..:1 J Z Q ! ii i - _• on s "X 1111. ftv .=-- pt, LA 3 > V a a *i:;)-- ..!-"----11°111- 1'1W:I".'"141.4-t 41;11.1%;11611114". s...'4..i . '. amp 4. .��.*/. 4 tf +C:4\-414* k 14.1 1 VO NC R. 0 w y 3, + f P P 4 X m h $ p zZQ , 'TI' . a 8 2 m P U} �'+ II J ° t�¢`u O N WO g 0 -_—_, m f !P II Or a e a Z d f P 1 Z Z oo W ,-/ ,wo ry/�Jf x = Q �w�'� Yw I-ZO o P O "'cc `�' LLF"'w-� a afr O W2wCI h a ! a2z °aaoJ -81,I,zo wakz w a �a8 a E _, = 06,9g2 <aa=_�Z- P A G Kr- $ wO0§ I, EWI#Et 8 f a a a O 2 0 r .-+ P , u a LL a0 a0 LL Qoowy�f0 KOF9:, til 4li d z ii II H ' ® iii n o r , e e It — e a z `�1/j Li) (.1') fav' •1 2 . N Q 0 t() co. CO / o N Q co �' O U Q) (1) N 0 O @ 7 na (/)L -0 Cl D CL --(30 o - r192c 4 QO U z �� o co .Q1 0 O' p W ti°`Q 0 Q) Z L- o = ,-,4 co +-) v 0) D LL d C 4 ryo`' O "' V N o ryco o4o CO N :2 O Q) -FoO Qll 0 L N nom. rye;' Cn c t6 N o a) cO m o 1 01 O 01 4- 7.5 O r-I cn • i • I • I I ' c > I I . 0 ."t CN -• CO CU --t N c-) L - �- .- O i1J C O - c (w)z661. 01 ar�ileial as! lahai-ea9'-'111.elsnv iro , '+,.,o_' a ,*4ix Q 0 illU Q v a,ov a .0 o a) o C a L Q E Q D 0 a) o �. ' +., � c_ a v 0 }' Q s- O N O Ln 3 Q o N o aW v = N N c C _Q Q 3 .4-' 0 O N v U +7. CO co `� O $ C Q If' >, ..0 Q CO 0 Q M ca L c o Q d' to Q ca Q C •`_, = UCC vi u = c .Q Q O a •- C 2 W LL v) L- OD m �, c C *'' t7 C 1 U CO 0 >' U C c W +�� C u O -- •O C O C ++ c v _ O Q E co C N — +-+ cu 4) \ Q cn p Q Q 0 CD LU LT_ N Q Q E , C l.1_ � .� CO `'• • D D z - v E Ln I I o >,- I I _c H o (.9 Q D ■ ■ ■ ■ • U V) C � rCI p ACV 0.0 Q N •�^ ( � ) N E N N > L U x a • ri• • • • s �, r U U O C tip UA C C v v a) a.) • c rw un C C Lu w °6 r mon no c 0 c O O •r _ • O m ro U (6 11 Q) a d G i N O C bA 0 co _ c -4 w 2 p v w O v C m o U m W CL) O (6 (E C m C CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 1 of 30 4tr C~. unty Admotstrative Services i r*ion Purchasing GRANT FUNDED INVITATION TO BID Date: From: Adam Northrup, Procurement Strategist (239)252-6098, Telephone Number (239)252-6302, FAX Adamnorthrup@colliergov.net, Email Address To: Prospective Vendors Subject: Solicitation: 14-6343 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) As requested by the Natural Resources Department,t he Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department has issued this ITB for the purpose of obtaining fair and competitive responses. Please refer to the Public Notice included in this document for the opening date and time and any applicable pre-ITB conference. All questions regarding this ITB must be submitted online on the Colier County Purchasing Department Online Bidding System website: www.colliergov.net/bid. All responses to questions will be posted on the website with electronic notification to all prospective vendors. We look forward to your participation in Collier County's competitive procurement process. cc: Gary McAlpin, Natural Resources ,`k Pur haarg7 x eerf•33327 Tamara Trail East•Naples,Nada 341'2.4901 wwvccoil ergov.r etpurcnasing #14-6343 1 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 2 of 30 Invitation to Bid Index PUBLIC NOTICE 3 EXHIBIT I: SCOPE OF WORK,SPECIFICATIONS AND RESPONSE FORMAT 4 EXHIBIT LA:GRANTING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS 7 EXHIBIT II:GENERAL BID INSTRUCTIONS 8 EXHIBIT III:STANDARD PURCHASE ORDER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13 EXHIBIT IV:ADDITIONAL ITB TERMS AND CONDITIONS 16 ATTACHMENT 1:VENDOR'S NON-RESPONSE STATEMENT 23 ATTACHMENT 2:VENDOR'S CHECK LIST 24 ATTACHMENT 3:VENDOR RESPONSE FORM 25 ATTACHMENT 4:IMMIGRATION LAW AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION 27 ATTACHMENT 5:VENDOR SUBSTITUTE W—9 28 ATTACHMENT 6:INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS 29 #14-6343 2 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 3 of 30 Public Notice Sealed bid responses for Solicitation 13-6343—Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery), will be received electronically only at the Collier County Government, Purchasing Department, 3327 Tamiami Trail E, Naples, FL 34112 until 3:00 p.m. Collier County local time on . ITB responses received after the stated time and date will not be accepted. Solicitation 13-6343—Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) ❑ No pre-bid conference will be held for this solicitation ❑ A non-mandatory pre-bid conference will be held on , commencing promptly at , and held at ❑ A mandatory pre-bid conference will be held on , commencing promptly at and held at . All prospective vendors must attend this conference in order to submit a bid response or to be considered for an award. All questions regarding this ITB must be submitted online on the Collier County Purchasing Department Online Bidding System website: www.colliergov.net/bid. All responses to questions will be posted on the website with electronic notification to all prospective vendors. All solicitation responses must be made on the official ITB response forms included and only available for download from the Collier County Purchasing Department Online Bidding System website noted herein. ITB Documents obtained from sources other than Collier County Purchasing Online Bidding System may not be accurate or current. Collier County encourages vendors to utilize recycled paper on all manual bid response submittals. Collier County does not discriminate based on age, race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability or marital status. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: /s/Joanne Markiewicz Joanne Markiewicz Director, Procurement Services Publidy posted on the Collier County Purchasing Department website: www.colliergov.net/purchasing and in the lobby of the Purchasing Building on #14-6343 3 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 4 of 30 Exhibit I: Scope of Work, Specifications and Response Format As requested by the Collier County Natural Resources Department (hereinafter, the"Division or Department"), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department (hereinafter, "County") has issued this Invitation to Bid (hereinafter, "ITB")with the intent of obtaining bids from interested and qualified firms in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Vendor, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Scope of Work and specifications stated. The results of this solicitation may be used by other County departments once awarded according to the Board of County Commissioners purchasing ordinance. Brief Description of Purchase Supply and Delivery of sand, from an approved upland sand source, for the Naples Beach Renourishment Project. Background The nourishment project will be constructed using an upland sand source. The project has three approved upland sand sources: Immokalee(Stewart),Witherspoon (Vulcan), and Lake Wales (Cemex), but not limited, to these three mines as long as it meets FDEP QA/QC qualifications. It is assumed that the sand will have no greater than a 6% moisture content, leading to a relationship of 1.5 tons/cy for sand delivery from the pit. Any truck that is loaded with a moisture content greater that 6%, the tonnage and payment will be adjust accordingly. The total volume of material is 52,452 cubic yards(78,678 tons) of beach quality sand. Detailed Scope of Work See Exhibit V—Technical Specifications 14-6343 Sand Sources See Exhibit VI — Standard Details(Sand source) 14-6343 Delivery Routes See Exhibit VII —Truck Routes 14-6343 Permits See Exhibit VIII — FDEP & USACE Permits 14-6343 Award Criteria ITB award criteria is as follows: • All questions on the Bid document shall be answered as to price(s), time requirements, and required document submissions. #14-6343 4 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 5 of 30 • Award shall be based upon the responses to all questions on the Bid Response Page(s). • Further consideration may include but not be limited to, references, completeness of bid response and past performances on other County bids/projects. • Prices will be read in public exactly as input on the electronic bid response form or written on the manually submitted Bid Response Page(s) at the time of the bid opening; however, should an error in calculations occur whenever unit pricing and price extensions are requested, the unit price shall prevail. Mathematical miscalculations may be corrected by the County to reflect the proper response. • The County's Purchasing Department reserves the right to clarify a vendor's proposal prior to the award of the solicitation. • It is the intent of Collier County to award to the lowest, qualified and responsive vendor(s) in accordance with the following methodology: On Attachment 7— Bid Schedule, input unit pricing for lines 1 —5, as shown below in yellow. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit,Price Sub Total 1 Provide sand Ton 78,678 $0.00 2 Transport sand Ton 78,678 $0.00 3 Sediment QA/QC Testing Lump Sum 1 $0.00 4 Maintenance of Traffic Lump Sum 1 $0.00 Project Management/Truck 5 Trackin Lum Sum 1 $0.00 6 BID TOTAL $0.00 The unit pricing will be multiplied by the requested quantities on each line to yield each individual line's subtotal. The Subtotals from lines 1 —5 will be added together to yield line 6 BID TOTAL. Report line 6 BID TOTAL on Attachment 3: Bid Response Form. • Collier County reserves the right to select one, or more than one suppliers, however, it is the intent to select a single awardee. • The contract will be in the form of a Collier County short form construction contract. Term of Contract The contract term, if an award(s) is/are made is intended to be for current needs only. Surcharges will not be accepted in conjunction with this contract, and such charges should be incorporated into the pricing structure. Projected Solicitation Timetable Event Date Issue Solicitation Notice Date Last Date for Receipt of Written Questions Date,Ti me, Naples Local Time Mandatory or Non-mandatory pre-solicitation meeting(Include Date,Ti me, Naples if applicable) Local Time and Locations Addendum Issued Resulting from Written Questions or Pre- Date Proposal Conference (Include if applicable) #14-6343 5 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 6 of 30 Solicitation Deadline Date and Tine Date,Ti me, Naples I Local Time Anticipated Evaluation of Submittals Date Range Vendor Presentations if Required (Include if applicable) Date Range Anticipated Completion of Contract Negotiations(Include if Date Range applicable) Anticipated Board of County Commissioner's Contract Date Range Approval Date Vendor Required Documents • Attachment 2: Vendor's Check List • Attachment 3: Vendor Response Form • Attachment 4: Immigration Law Affidavit Certification • Attachment 5: Vendor Substitute W—9 • Attachment 6: Insurance and Bonding Requirements • E-Verify company profile page or memorandum of understanding • Excluded Parties List System Documentation located at: www.sam.gov, and select SEARCH. • Exhibit I —Supplemental Terms and Conditions #14-6343 6 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 7 of 30 Exhibit I: Granting Agency Requirements See file titled Exhibit I —Supplemental Terms and Conditions #14-6343 7 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 8 of 30 Exhibit II: General Bid Instructions 1. Purpose/Objective As requested by the Collier County departments or divisions identified in Exhibit 1, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department(hereinafter, the County) has issued this Invitation to Bid (hereinafter, the"ITB", or"Bid")with the sole purpose and intent of obtaining bid responses from interested and qualified firms in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications stated and/or attached herein/hereto. The successful vendor will hereinafter be referred to as the"Vendor". All bids must be submitted on the Bid forms furnished by the County noted in Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this ITB. No bid will be considered unless the Bid form is properly signed.V endor is responsible to read and follow the instructions very carefully, as any misinterpretation or failure to comply with these instructions could lead to the bid submitted as being rejected as non-responsive. 2. Pricing Vendors must provide unit prices using the unit of measured specified by the County. All prices will remain firm for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days from date of bid opening. After award by the Board of County Commissioners, prices may only be adjusted as outlined in Exhibit I: Term of Contract. 3. Alternate Bid Pricing In the event that alternate pricing is requested, it is an expressed requirement of the bid to provide pricing for all alternates as listed. The omission of a response or a no-bid or lack of a submitted price will be the basis for the rejection of the submitted bid response. All bids responses received without pricing for all alternates as listed will be considered technically non-responsive and will not be considered for award. 4. Equal Product Manufacturer's name, brand name and/or model number are used in these specifications for the purpose of establishing minimum requirements of level of quality, standards of performance and/or design required, and is in no way intended to prohibit the bidding of other manufacturer's items of equal or similar material. An equal or similar product may be bid, provided that the product is found to be equal or similar in quality, standard of performance, design, etc. to the item specified. Where an equal or similar is bid, the Bid must be accompanied with two(2) complete sets of factory information sheets (specifications, brochures, etc.) and test results, if applicable, of unit bid as equal or similar. Equal product samples, if required for evaluation, and at no cost to the County, must be submitted with the Bid. These samples must be submitted to the County during the bid evaluation period. The County shall be sole judge of equality or similarity, and its decision shall be final in the best interest. #14-6343 8 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 9 of 30 5. Discounts Any discounts or terms must be shown on the Bid form. Such discounts, if any, may be considered in the award of tie bids. In no instance should payment terms less than fifteen (15) calendar days be offered. 6. Exceptions Vendors taking exception to any part or section of these specifications shall indicate such exceptions on a separate sheet entitled "EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS". Failure to indicate any exceptions shall be interpreted as the Vendors intent to fully comply with the specifications as written. Exceptions taken by the Vendor may be deemed grounds for rejection of bid response. 7. Addenda The County reserves the right to formally amend and/or clarify the requirements of the bid specifications where it deems necessary. Any such addendum/clarification shall be in writing and shall be distributed electronically to all parties who received the original bid specifications prior to the deadline for submission of Bids. All changes to this ITB will be conveyed electronically through a notice of addendum or questions and answers to all vendors registered under the applicable commodity code(s) at the time when the original ITB was released, as well as those vendors who downloaded the ITB document. Additionally, all addendums are posted on the Collier County Purchasing Department Online Biddng System website: www.colliergov.net/bid. Before submitting a bid response, please make sure that you have read all, understood clearly and complied completely with any changes stated in the addenda as failure to do so may result in the rejection of your submittal. 8. Bid Submission The County preferred method of bid submittal is electronic. All electronic bids shall be submitted online via the Collier County Purchasing Department Online Bidding System website: www.colliergov.net/bid. If you are unable to submit via the Online Bidcing System, all paper bids shall be submitted to the County Procurement Director, Collier County Government Complex, Purchasing Building "G", Naples, FL 34112, by the date and time as stated in the Legal Notice. The County assumes no responsibility for bid responses received after the due date and time, or at any office or location other than that specified herein,whether due to mail delays, courier mistakes, mishandling, inclement weather or any other reason. Late bid responses shall be returned unopened,and shall not be considered for award. Vendors must submit one(1) paper copy clearly labeled "Master," and one (1) compact disks (CD's/DVD's)with a copy of the vendor's proposal on each CD in Word, Excel or PDF. List the Solicitation Number and Title on the outside of the box or envelope. All bids sent by courier service must have the bid number and title on the outside of the courier packet. Vendors who wish to receive copies of bids after the bid opening may view and download same from the Collier County Purchasing Department Internet bid site. #14-6343 9 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 10 of 30 9. Questions If the vendor should be of the opinion that the meaning of any part of the Bid Document is doubtful, obscure or contains errors or omissions it should report such opinion to the Procurement Strategist before the bid opening date. Direct questions related to this ITB only to the Collier County Purchasing Department Internet website: www.colliergov.net/bid. Questions will not be answered after the date noted on the ITB. Vendors must clearly understand that the only official answer or position of the County will be the one stated on the Collier County Purchasing Department Online Bidding System website. For general questions, please call the referenced Procurement Strategist identified in the Public Notice. 10. Protests Any prospective vendor/ proposer who desires to protest any aspect(s) or provision(s) of the solicitation (induding the form of the solicitation documents or procedures) shall file their protest with the Procurement Director prior to the time of the bid opening strictly in accordance with the County's then current purchasing ordinance and policies. 11. Rejection and Waiver The County reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive defects in the form of bid, also to select the bid that best meets the requirements of the County. Vendors whose bids, past performance or current status do not reflect the capability, integrity or reliability to fully and in good faith perform the requirements denoted may be rejected as non- responsive. Bids that do not meet all necessary requirements of this solicitation or fail to provide all required information, documents or materials may be rejected as non-responsive. 12. Lobbying All firms are hereby placed on NOTICE that the County Commission does not wish to be lobbied either individually or collectively about a project for which a firm has submitted a bid. Firms and their agents are not to contact members of the County Commission for such purposes as meetings of introduction, luncheons, dinners, etc. During the bidding process, from bid opening to final Board approval, no firm or its agent shall contact any other employee of Collier County with the exception of the Purchasing Department. 13. Certificate of Authority to Conduct Business in the State of Florida (Florida Statute 607.1501) In order to be considered for award, firms must be registered with the Florida Department of State Divisions of Corporations in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statute 607.1501 and provide a certificate of authority (www.sunbiz.orq/search.html) prior to execution of a contract. A copy of the document may be submitted with the solicitation response and the document number shall be identified. Firms who do not provide the certificate of authority at the time of response shall be required to provide same within five (5) days upon notification of selection for award. If the firm cannot provide the document within the referenced timeframe, the County reserves the right to award to another firm. 14. General Information #14-6343 10 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 11 of 30 When it is deemed by the County that a bid cannot be awarded as originally intended,the County reserves the right to award this bid through an approach which is the best interest of the County. Alternate bids will not be considered unless authorized by the ITB. In case of identical bids tying as low bid,the County shall ask vendors to submit certification that they have a drug-free workplace in accordance with Section 287.087 Florida Statutes. 15. Bid Award Process Award of contract will be made by the Board of County Commissioners in public session. Award shall be made in a manner consistent with the County's purchasing ordinance. Award recommendations will be posted outside the offices of the Purchasing Department as well as on the Collier County Purchasing Department website on Wednesdays and Thursdays prior to the County Commission meetings. Any actual or prospective respondent who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Procurement Director within two (2) calendar days (excluding weekends and County holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. Upon filing of said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest Policy" is available at the office of the Procurement Director. 16.Grant Funded Purchases Vendors submitting proposals for this purchase must validate that they are not excluded from receiving Federal contracts, certain subcontracts, and certain Federal financial and nonfinancial assistance and benefits, pursuant to the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 6101, note, E.O. 12549, E.O. 12689,48 CFR 9.404, and each agency's codification of the Common Rule for Nonprocurement suspension and debarment. Information for the former"Excluded Parties List System" may be found at the System for Award Management(SAM) website at www.sam.gov, and select SEARCH. This is a free web-site which consolidates Federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. Currently CCR, FedReg, ORCA and EPLS have been migrated into SAM. a. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Special Terms and Conditions: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. 111-5, (Recovery Act)was enacted to preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery, assist those most impacted by the recession, provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological advances in science and health, invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits, stabilize State and local government budgets, in order to minimize and avoid reductions in essential services and counterproductive State and local tax increases. Registration: Section 1512 provides that first tier Contractors of ARRA funds must register with Central Contractor Registration database (CCR). CCR registration can be completed at http://www.ccr.gov. CCR registration must be completed before the first quarterly Section 1512 report is due. ii. Reporting:S ection 1512 provides for federal reporting on projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), requires vendors contractors to report their Dun and Bradstreet number(DUNS). Vendors who do not know their DUNS number may receive more information through www.dnb.com and select"D & B D-U-N-S Number." A DUNS number request takes approximately 30 days to receive and there is no cost. Vendors will need this number if they are awarded a project with ARRA funds by Collier #14-6343 11 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 12 of 30 County. If a project is grant funded, and to satisfy the grant reprinting requirements, the County may require additional reporting information from the vendor(i.e.job reports, etc.). iii. Buy American: Section 1605(a) of the Recovery Act directs that, subject to certain exceptions, no funds appropriated or otherwise made available for a project may be used for the construction, alteration or repair of a public building or public work unless all the iron, steel and manufactured goods used are produced in the United States. The law covers Recovery Act-funded federal contracts as well as Recovery Act-funded state and local public works projects. iv. Davis Bacon: Section 1606 of the Recovery act directs that projects awarded as a result of this contract may be subject to federal grant requirements involving prevailing wages as described in the US Department of Labor's site http://www.gpo.gov/davisbacon/fi.html. v. Waste Disposal: The County may request the assistance of the awarded supplier to assist with developing a disposal plan for sanitary or hazardous waste generated by a specific project. c. Davis Bacon: Projects awarded as a result of this contract may be subject to federal grant requirements involving prevailing wages as described in the US Department of Labor's site http://www.gpo.gov/davisbacon/fl.html. d. Department of Transportation Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program is intended to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts in the Department's highway, transit, airport, and highway safety financial assistance programs. Projects awarded as a result of this contract may be subject to federal grant requirements under the DBE program. Additional information may be found at: http://www.dotcr.ost.dot.gov/asp/dbe.asp. #14-6343 12 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 13 of 30 Exhibit III: Standard Purchase Order Terms and Conditions 1. Offer actual receipt of the goods by the COUNTY This offer is subject to cancellation by the nonetheless remain with VENDOR. COUNTY without notice if not accepted by b) No charges will be paid by the COUNTY for VENDOR within fourteen (14)days of issuance. packing, crating or cartage unless otherwise specifically stated in this Purchase Order. 2. Acceptance and Confirmation Unless otherwise provided in Purchase This Purchase Order (including all documents Order, no invoices shall be issued nor attached to or referenced therein) constitutes payments made prior to delivery. Unless the entire agreement between the parties, unless freight and other charges are itemized, any otherwise specifically noted by the COUNTY on discount will be taken on the full amount of the face of this Purchase Order. Each delivery of invoice. goods and/or services received by the COUNTY c) All shipments of goods scheduled on the from VENDOR shall be deemed to be upon the same day via the same route must be terms and conditions contained in this Purchase consolidated. Each shipping container must Order. be consecutively numbered and marked to show this Purchase Order number. The No additional terms may be added and Purchase container and Purchase Order numbers must Order may not be changed except by written be indicated on bill of lading. Packing slips instrument executed by the COUNTY. VENDOR must show Purchase Order number and is deemed to be on notice that the COUNTY must be included on each package of less objects to any additional or different terms and than container load (LCL) shipments and/or conditions contained in any acknowledgment, with each car load of equipment. The invoice or other communication from VENDOR, COUNTY reserves the right to refuse or notwithstanding the COUNTY'S acceptance or return any shipment or equipment at payment for any delivery of goods and/or VENDOR'S expense that is not marked with services, or any similar act by VENDOR. Purchase Order numbers. VENDOR agrees to declare to the carrier the value of any 3. Inspection shipment made under this Purchase Order All goods and/or services delivered hereunder and the full invoice value of such shipment. shall be received subject to the COUNTY'S d) All invoices must contain the Purchase Order inspection and approval and payment therefore number and any other specific information as shall not constitute acceptance. All payments are identified on the Purchase Order. Discounts subject to adjustment for shortage or rejection. of prompt payment will be computed from the All defective or nonconforming goods will be date of receipt of goods or from date of returned pursuant to VENDOR'S instruction at receipt of invoices, whichever is later. VENDOR'S expense. Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and in compliance with To the extent that a purchase order requires a Chapter 218, Fla. Stats., otherwise known as series of performances by VENDOR, the the "Local Government Prompt Payment COUNTY prospectively reserves the right to Act," and, pursuant to the Board of County cancel the entire remainder of the Purchase Commissioners Purchasing Policy. Order if goods and/or services provided early in the term of the Purchase Order are 5. Time Is Of the Essence non-conforming or otherwise rejected by the Time for delivery of goods or performance of COUNTY. services under this Purchase Order is of the essence. Failure of VENDOR to meet delivery 4. Shipping and Invoices schedules or deliver within a reasonable time, as a) All goods are FOB destination and must be interpreted by the COUNTY in its sole judgment, suitably packed and prepared to secure the shall entitle the COUNTY to seek all remedies lowest transportation rates and to comply available to it at law or in equity. VENDOR with all carrier regulations. Risk of loss of agrees to reimburse the COUNTY for any any goods sold hereunder shall transfer to expenses incurred in enforcing its rights. the COUNTY at the time and place of VENDOR further agrees that undiscovered delivery; provided that risk of loss prior to delivery of nonconforming goods and/or services #14-6343 13 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 14 of 30 is not a waiver of the COUNTY'S right to insist including but not limited to attorneys'fees, arising upon further compliance with all specifications. from, caused by or related to the injury or death of any person (including but not limited to 6. Changes employees and agents of VENDOR in the The COUNTY may at any time and by written performance of their duties or otherwise), or notice make changes to drawings and damage to property (including property of the specifications, shipping instructions, quantities COUNTY or other persons), which arise out of or and delivery schedules within the general scope are incident to the goods and/or services to be of this Purchase Order. Should any such change provided hereunder. increase or decrease the cost of, or the time required for performance of the Purchase Order, 11. Warranty of Non-Infringement an equitable adjustment in the price and/or VENDOR represents and warrants that all goods delivery schedule will be negotiated by the sold or services performed under this Purchase COUNTY and VENDOR. Notwithstanding the Order are: a) in compliance with applicable laws; foregoing, VENDOR has an affirmative obligation b) do not infringe any patent, trademark, to give notice if the changes will decrease costs. copyright or trade secret; and c) do not constitute Any claims for adjustment by VENDOR must be unfair competition. made within thirty (30) days from the date the change is ordered or within such additional VENDOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the period of time as may be agreed upon by the COUNTY from and against any and all claims, parties. including claims of negligence, costs and expense, including but not limited to attorneys' 7. Warranties fees, which arise from any claim, suit or VENDOR expressly warrants that the goods proceeding alleging that the COUNTY'S use of and/or services covered by this Purchase Order the goods and/or services provided under this will conform to the specifications, drawings, Purchase Order are inconsistent with VENDOR'S samples or other descriptions furnished or representations and warranties in section 11 (a). specified by the COUNTY, and will be of satisfactory material and quality production, free If any claim which arises from VENDOR'S breach from defects and sufficient for the purpose of section 11 (a) has occurred, or is likely to intended. Goods shall be delivered free from any occur, VENDOR may, at the COUNTY'S option, security interest or other lien, encumbrance or procure for the COUNTY the right to continue claim of any third party. These warranties shall using the goods or services, or replace or modify survive inspection, acceptance, passage of title the goods or services so that they become and payment by the COUNTY. non-infringing, (without any material degradation in performance, quality, functionality or additional 8. Statutory Conformity cost to the COUNTY). Goods and services provided pursuant to this Purchase Order, and their production and 12. Insurance Requirements transportation shall conform to all applicable The VENDOR, at its sole expense, shall provide laws, including but not limited to the Occupational commercial insurance of such type and with such Health and Safety Act, the Federal terms and limits as may be reasonably Transportation Act and the Fair Labor Standards associated with the Purchase Order. Providing Act, as well as any law or regulation noted on the and maintaining adequate insurance coverage is face of the Purchase Order. a material obligation of the VENDOR. All insurance policies shall be executed through 9. Advertising insurers authorized or eligible to write policies in No VENDOR providing goods and services to the the State of Florida. COUNTY shall advertise the fact that it has contracted with the COUNTY for goods and/or 13. Compliance with Laws services, or appropriate or make use of the In fulfilling the terms of this Purchase Order, COUNTY'S name or other identifying marks or VENDOR agrees that it will comply with all property without the prior written consent of the federal, state, and local laws, rules, codes, and COUNTY'S Purchasing Department. ordinances that are applicable to the conduct of its business. By way of non-exhaustive example, this shall include the American with Disabilities 10. Indemnification Act and all prohibitions against discrimination on VENDOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the the basis of race, religion, sex creed, national COUNTY from any and all claims, including origin, handicap, marital status, or veterans' claims of negligence, costs and expenses, status. Further, VENDOR acknowledges and #14-6343 14 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 15 of 30 without exception or stipulation shall be fully such breach and VENDOR has failed to cure responsible for complying with the provisions of within 10 days of receipt of such notice. the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.S.C. 1324, et seq. and 19. General regulations relating thereto, as either may be a) This Purchase Order shall be governed by amended. Failure by the awarded firm(s) to the laws of the State of Florida. The venue comply with the laws referenced herein shall for any action brought to specifically enforce constitute a breach of the award agreement and any of the terms and conditions of this the County shall have the discretion to Purchase Order shall be the Twentieth unilaterally terminate said agreement Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, immediately. Any breach of this provision may Florida be regarded by the COUNTY as a material and b) Failure of the COUNTY to act immediately in substantial breach of the contract arising from response to a breach of this Purchase Order this Purchase Order. by VENDOR shall not constitute a waiver of breach. Waiver of the COUNTY by any 14. Force Majeure default by VENDOR hereunder shall not be Neither the COUNTY nor VENDOR shall be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default responsible for any delay or failure in by VENDOR. performance resulting from any cause beyond c) All notices under this Purchase Order shall their control, including, but without limitation to be sent to the respective addresses on the war, strikes, civil disturbances and acts of nature. face page by certified mail, return receipt When VENDOR has knowledge of any actual or requested, by overnight courier service, or by potential force majeure or other conditions which personal delivery and will be deemed will delay or threatens to delay timely effective upon receipt. Postage, delivery and performance of this Purchase Order, VENDOR other charges shall be paid by the sender. A shall immediately give notice thereof, including all party may change its address for notice by relevant information with respects to what steps written notice complying with the VENDOR is taking to complete delivery of the requirements of this section. goods and/or services to the COUNTY. d) The Vendor agrees to reimbursement of any travel expenses that may be associated with 15. Assignment this Purchase Order in accordance with VENDOR may not assign this Purchase Order, Florida Statute Chapter 112.061, Per Diem nor any money due or to become due without the and Travel Expenses for Public Officers, prior written consent of the COUNTY. Any employees and authorized persons. assignment made without such consent shall be e) In the event of any conflict between or deemed void. among the terms of any Contract Documents related to this Purchase Order, the terms of 16. Taxes the Contract Documents shall take Goods and services procured subject to this precedence over the terms of the Purchase Purchase Order are exempt from Florida sales Order. To the extent any terms and /or and use tax on real property, transient rental conditions of this Purchase Order duplicate property rented, tangible personal purchased or or overlap the Terms and Conditions of the rented, or services purchased (Florida Statutes, Contract Documents, the provisions of the Chapter 212), and from federal excise tax. Terms and/or Conditions that are most favorable to the County and/or provide the 17. Annual Appropriations greatest protection to the County shall The COUNTY'S performance and obligation to govern. pay under this Purchase Order shall be contingent upon an annual appropriation of funds. 18. Termination This Purchase Order may be terminated at any time by the COUNTY upon 30 days prior written notice to the VENDOR. This Purchase Order may be terminated immediately by the COUNTY for breach by VENDOR of the terms and conditions of this Purchase Order, provided that COUNTY has provided VENDOR with notice of #14-6343 15 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 16 of 30 Exhibit IV: Additional ITB Terms and Conditions 1. Additional Items and/or Services Additional items and/or services may be added to the resultant contract, or purchase order, in compliance with the purchasing ordinance. 2. Conflict of Interest Vendor shall provide a list of any businesses and/or organizations to which the firm has any affiliation or obligations within the past five (5)years; whether paid or donated, which could be construed by the County as a conflict of interest. Disclosure of any potential or actual conflict of interest is subject to County staff review and does not in and of itself disqualify a firm from consideration. These disclosures are intended to identify and or preclude conflict of interest situations during contract selection and execution. 3. Vendor Performance Evaluation Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of$25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion/termination of agreement. 5. Use of Subcontractors Bidders on any service related project, including construction, must be qualified and directly responsible for 20% or more of the solicitation amount for said work. 6. Deductions for Non-Performance The County reserves the right to deduct a portion of any invoice for goods not delivered, or services not performed in accordance with requirements, including required timeframe. The County may also deduct, or chargeback the Vendor the costs necessary to correct the deficiencies directly related to the Vendor's non-performance. 7. Offer Extended to Other Governmental Entities Collier County encourages and agrees to the successful vendor extending the pricing, terms and conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the discretion of the successful vendor. 8. Environmental Health and Safety All Vendors and Sub vendors performing service for Collier County are required and shall comply with all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), State and County Safety and Occupational Health Standards and any other applicable rules and regulations. Vendors and Sub vendors shall be responsible for the safety of their employees and any unsafe acts or conditions that may cause injury or damage to any persons or property within and around the work site. All firewall penetrations must be protected in order to meet Fire Codes. Collier County Government has authorized OSHA representatives to enter any Collier County facility, property and/or right-of-way for the purpose of inspection of any Vendor's work operations. This provision is non-negotiable by any department and/or Vendor. #14-6343 16 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports All new electrical installations shall incorporate NFPA 70E Short Circuit Protective Device Coordination and Arc Flash Studies where relevant as determined by the engineer. All electrical installations shall be labeled with appropriate NFPA 70E arch flash boundary and PPE Protective labels. 9. Public Records Compliance The Vendor/Contractor agrees to comply with the Florida Public Records Law Chapter 119(including specifically those contractual requirements at F.S. § 119.0701(2) (a)-(d) and (3)), ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental agencies. 10. Standards of Conduct The Vendor shall employ people to work on County projects who are neat, clean, well-groomed and courteous. Subject to the American with Disabilities Act, Vendor shall supply competent employees who are physically capable of performing their employment duties. The County may require the Vendor to remove an employee it deems careless, incompetent, insubordinate or otherwise objectionable and whose continued employment on Collier County projects is not in the best interest of the County. 11. Licenses The Vendor is required to possess the correct professional and other licenses, and any other authorizations necessary to perform the required work pursuant to all applicable Federal, State and Local Law, Statute, Ordinances, and rules and regulations of any kind. Additionally, copies of all the required licenses must be submitted with the bid response indicating that the entity bidding, as well as the team assigned to the County account, is properly licensed to perform the activities or work included in the ITB documents. Failure on the part of any vendor to supply this documentation with their bid response may be grounds for deeming vendor non-responsive. A Vendor with an office within Collier County is required to have an occupational license. All State Certified contractors who may need to pull Collier County permits or call in inspections must complete a Collier County Contractor License registration form and submit the required fee. After registering the license/registration will need to be renewed thereafter to remain "active" in Collier County. Questions regarding professional licenses should be directed to Contractor Licensing, Community Development and Environmental Services at (239) 252-2431, 252-2432 or 252-2909. Questions regarding required Business Tax Receipt(formerly known as Occupational Licenses) should be directed to the Tax Collector's Office at(239)252-2477. 12. Protection of Property The Vendor shall ensure that the service is performed in such manner as to not damage any property. In the event damage occurs to any property as a direct result of the Vendor or their Sub vendor in the performance of the required service, the Vendor shall repair/replace, to the County's satisfaction, damaged property at no additional cost to the County. If the damage caused by the Vendor or their Sub vendor has to be repaired/replaced by the County, the cost of such work will be deducted from the monies due the Vendor. 13. Prohibition of Gifts to County Employees No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, the current Collier County Ethics Ordinance and County Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the #14-6343 17 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports individual, firm, and/or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified:period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual and/or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/or quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/or firm for cause. 14. Invoice and Payments Payments are made in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Chapter 218, Florida Statutes. Vendor's invoices must include: • Purchase Order Number • Description and quantities of the goods or services provided per instructions on the County's purchase order or contract. Invoices shall be sent to: Board of County Commissioners Clerk's Finance Department ATTN: Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trail E Ste 700 Naples FL 34112 Or emailed to: bccapclerk(cr�collierclerk.corn. Collier County, in its sole discretion, will determine the method of payment for goods and/or services as part of this agreement. Payment methods include: • Traditional—payment by check, wire transfer or other cash equivalent. • Standard—payment by purchasing card. Collier County's Purchasing Card Program is supported by standard bank credit suppliers (i.e. VISA and MasterCard), and as such, is cognizant of the Rules for VISA Merchants and MasterCard Merchant Rules. The County may not accept any additional surcharges(credit card transaction fees)as a result of using the County's credit card for transactions relating to this solicitation. The County will entertain bids clearly stating pricing for standard payment methods. An additional separate discounted price for traditional payments may be provided at the initial bid submittal if it is clearly marked as an "Additional Cash Discount." Upon execution of the Contract and completion of each month's work, payment requests may be submitted to the Project Manager on a monthly basis by the Contractor for services rendered for that prior month. Services beyond sixty (60) days from current monthly invoice will not be considered for payment without prior approval from the Project manager. All invoices must be submitted within the fiscal year the work was performed. (County's fiscal year is October 1 - September 30.) Invoices submitted after the close of the fiscal year will not be accepted (or processed for payment) unless specifically authorized by the Project Manager. Payments will be made for articles and/or services furnished, delivered, and accepted, upon receipt and approval of invoices submitted on the date of services or within six (6) months after completion of contract. Any untimely submission of invoices beyond the specified deadline period is subject to non- payment under the legal doctrine of"laches" as untimely submitted. Time shall be deemed of the essence with respect to the timely submission of invoices under this agreement. In instances where the successful contractor may owe debts(including, but not limited to taxes or other fees)to Collier County and the contractor has not satisfied nor made arrangement to satisfy these debts, #14-6343 18 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports the County reserves the right to off-set the amount owed to the County by applying the amountoomved to the vendor or contractor for services performed of for materials delivered in association with a contract. Invoices shall not reflect sales tax. After review and approval,the invoice will be transmitted to the Finance Division for payment. Payment will be made upon receipt of proper invoice and in compliance with Chapter 218 Florida Statutes, otherwise known as the "Local Government Prompt Payment Act." Collier County reserves the right to withhold and/or reduce an appropriate amount of any payment for work not performed or for unsatisfactory performance of Contractual requirements. 15.Survivability Bids (ITBs/RFPs): The Consultant/Contractor/Vendor agrees that any Work Order/Purchase Order that extends beyond the expiration date of Solicitation 14-6343— Naples Beach Renourishment (Supply and Delivery) resultant of this solicitation will survive and remain subject to the terms and conditions of that Agreement until the completion or termination of any Work Order/Purchase Order. 16. Insurance Requirements The Vendor shall at its own expense, carry and maintain insurance coverage from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida as set forth in Attachment 3 of this solicitation. The Vendor shall procure and maintain property insurance upon the entire project, if required, to the full insurable value of the scope of work. The County and the Vendor waive against each other and the County's separate Vendors, Contractors, Design Consultant, Subcontractors agents and employees of each and all of them, all damages covered by property insurance provided herein,except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance. The Vendor and County shall,where appropriatg require similar waivers of subrogation from the County's separate Vendors, Design Consultants and Subcontractors and shall require each of them to include similar waivers in their contracts. Collier County shall be responsible for purchasing and maintaining, its own liability insurance. Certificates issued as a result of the award of this solicitation must identify "For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County." The General Liability Policy provided by Vendor to meet the requirements of this solicitation shall name Collier County, Florida, as an additional insured as to the operations of Vendor under this solicitation and shall contain a severability of interests provisions. Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. The "Certificate Holder' should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Naples, Florida The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the minimum requirements set forth in Attachment 3, with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO)forms and endorsements or their equivalents. If Vendor has any self-insured retentions or deductibles under any of the below listed minimum required coverage, Vendor must identify on the Certificate of Insurance the nature and amount of such self- insured retentions or deductibles and provide satisfactory evidence of financial responsibility for such obligations. All self-insured retentions or deductibles will be Vendor's sole responsibility. #14-6343 19 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports Coverage(s) shall be maintained without interruption from the date of commencement of theWork until the date of completion and acceptance of the scope of work by the County or as specified in this solicitation, whichever is longer. The Vendor and/or its insurance carrier shall provide 30 days written notice to the County of policy cancellation or non-renewal on the part of the insurance carrier or the Vendor. The Vendor shall also notify the County, in a like manner, within twenty-four(24) hours after receipt, of any notices of expiration, cancellation, non-renewal or material change in coverage or limits received by Vendor from its insurer and nothing contained herein shall relieve Vendor of this requirement to provide notice. In the event of a reduction in the aggregate limit of any policy to be provided by Vendor hereunder, Vendor shall immediately take steps to have the aggregate limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. Should at any time the Vendor not maintain the insurance coverage(s) required herein, the County may terminate the Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverage(s) and charge the Vendor for such coverage(s) purchased. If Vendor fails to reimburse the County for such costs within thirty (30) days after demand, the County has the right to offset these costs from any amount due Vendor under this Agreement or any other agreement between the County and Vendor. The County shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverage(s) purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the County to purchase such insurance coverage(s) shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of any of its rights under the Contract Documents. If the initial or any subsequently issued Certificate of Insurance expires prior to the completion of the scope of work, the Vendor shall furnish to the County renewal or replacement Certificate(s) of Insurance not later than ten (10)calendar days after the expiration date on the certificate. Failure of the Vendor to provide the County with such renewal certificate(s) shall be considered justification for the County to terminate any and all contracts. 17. Immigration Law Affidavit Certification Statutes and executive orders require employers to abide by the immigration laws of the United States and to employ only individuals who are eligible to work in the United States. The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) operated by the Department of Homeland Security(DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA), provides an Internet-based means of verifying employment eligibility of workers in the United States; it is not a substitute for any other employment eligibility verification requirements. The program will be used for Collier County formal Invitations to Bid (ITB) and Request for Proposals (RFP) including professional services and construction services. Exceptions to the program: • Commodity based procurement where no services are provided. • Where the requirement for the affidavit is waived by the Board of County Commissioners Vendors/ Bidders are required to enroll in the E-Verify program, and provide acceptable evidence of their enrollment, at the time of the submission of the vendor's/bidder's proposal. Acceptable evidence consists of a copy of the properly completed E-Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company. Vendors are also required to provide the Collier County Purchasing Department an executed affidavit certifying they shall comply with the E-Verify Program. The affidavit is attached to the solicitation documents. If the Bidder/Vendor does not comply with providing both the acceptable E-Verify evidence and the executed affidavit the bidder's/vendor's proposal may be deemed non-responsive. #14-6343 20 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports Additionally, vendors shall require all subcontracted vendors to use the E-Verify system for alh puhases not covered under the"Exceptions to the program" clause above. For additional information regarding the Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) program visit the following website: http://www.dhs.qov/E-Verify. It shall be the vendor's responsibility to familiarize themselves with all rules and regulations governing this program. Vendor acknowledges, and without exception or stipulation, any firm(s) receiving an award shall be fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.S.C. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended and with the provisions contained within this affidavit. Failure by the awarded firm(s) to comply with the laws referenced herein or the provisions of this affidavit shall constitute a breach of the award agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate said agreement immediately. 18. Background Checks If required, Vendor/ Contractor/ Proposer shall be responsible for the costs of providing background checks by the Collier County Facilities Management Department, and drug testing for all employees that shall provide services to the County under this Agreement. This may include, but not be limited to, checking federal, state and local law enforcement records, including a state and FBI fingerprint check, credit reports, education, residence and employment verifications and other related records. Contractor shall be required to maintain records on each employee and make them available to the County for at least four(4) years. 19. Maintenance of Traffic Policy For all projects that are conducted within a Collier County Right-of-Way, the Vendor shall provide and erect Traffic Control Devices as prescribed in the current edition of the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD), where applicable on local roadways and as prescribed in the Florida Department of Transportation's Design Standards (DS) on state roadways. These projects shall also comply with Collier County's Maintenance of Traffic Policy, #5807, incorporated herein by reference. Copies are available through the Risk Management and/or Purchasing Departments and are available on-line at colliergov.net/purchasing. The Vendor will be responsible for obtaining copies of all required manuals, MUTCD, FDOT Roadway& Traffic Design Standards Indexes, or other related documents, so to become familiar with their requirements. Strict adherence to the requirements of the Maintenance of Traffic ("MOT") policy will be enforced under this Contract. All costs associated with the Maintenance of Traffic shall be included on the line item on the bid page. If MOT is required, MOT is to be provided within ten (10) days of receipt of Notice of Award. 20, Debris Vendor shall be responsible for the removal and disposal of all debris from the site and the cleaning of the affected areas. Vendor shall keep the premises free of debris and unusable materials resulting from their work and as work progresses; or upon the request of the County's representative, shall remove and dispose such debris and materials from the property. The Vendor shall leave all affected areas as they were prior to beginning work. 21. Direct Material Purchase The County reserves the right to require Vendor to assign some or all of its agreements with material suppliers directly to the County. Any such goods and/or materials purchased by the County pursuant to such an assignment of a material supply agreement shall be referred to as"County Furnished Materials" #14-6343 21 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports and the responsibilities of both the County and the Vendor relating to said materials shall beireened by the terms and conditions of this solicitation. Additionally, the County at its sole option may choose to purchase some or all of the goods and/or materials from other suppliers. In either instance the County may require the following information from the Vendor: • Required quantities of material. • Specifications relating to goods and/or materials required for job including brand and/or model number or type if applicable • Pricing and availability of goods and/or materials provided under Vendor's agreements with material suppliers 22. Grant Compliance The purchase of any goods and/or services that are funded through Federal Grant Appropriations,th e State of Florida, or any other public or private foundations shall be subject to the compliance and reporting requirements of the granting agency. 23. Equipment Vendor shall have available and in good working condition, the necessary equipment to perform the required service. If required, the Vendor shall supply a list of equipment and an hourly rate for each. Hourly rates will commence once equipment arrives at the service site. In the event that additional specialized and/or heavy equipment (backhoe, crane, mudhog, etc.) is needed, the Project Manager must be notified in advance for approval. The reimbursement of additional equipment expense shall be at cost and will commence once equipment arrives at the service site. The County reserves the right to request and obtain documentation of the Vendor's cost, and to withhold payments until documentation is provided. The scope of these specifications is to ensure the delivery of a complete unit ready for operation. Omission of any essential detail from these specifications does not relieve the Vendor from furnishing a complete unit. All equipment must be new and of current manufacture in production at the time of bid opening, and carry standard warranties. At the time of delivery, at least two (2) complete shop repair manuals and parts lists must be furnished with each type of equipment. Vendor must service all equipment prior to delivery and/or acceptance by the County. #14-6343 22 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 23 of 30 Colter County A.ct mNztrabve Services D vrsron Purchasing Attachment 1: Vendor's Non-Response Statement The sole intent of the Collier County Purchasing Department is to issue solicitations that are clear, concise and openly competitive. Therefore, we are interested in ascertaining reasons why prospective Vendors did not wish to respond to this ITB. If your firm is not responding to this ITB, please indicate the reason(s) by checking any appropriate item(s) listed below and return this form via email or fax to the Procurement Strategist listed on the first page or mail to: Collier County Purchasing Department, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112. We are not responding to this ITB for the following reason(s): Solicitation: 14-6343—Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) ❑ Services requested not available through our company. ❑ Our firm could not meet specifications/scope of work. ❑ Specifications/scope of work not clearly understood (too vague, rigid, etc.) ❑ Project is too small. ❑ Insufficient time allowed for preparation of response. ❑ Incorrect address used. Please correct mailing address: ❑ Other reason(s): Firm's Complete Legal Name Address City, State, Zip Telephone Number FAX Number Signature/Title Type Name of Signature Date: #14-6343 23 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 24 of 30 Co ier County Adnlnistratrve SeEvIces Divan Purchasing Attachment 2: Vendor's Check List IMPORTANT: THIS SHEET MUST BE SIGNED BY VENDOR. Please read carefully, sign in the spaces indicated and return with bid. Vendor should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed: 1. The Bid has been signed. 2. The Bid prices offered have been reviewed. 3. The price extensions and totals have been checked. 4. The payment terms have been indicated. 5. All granting agency requirements have been met including submittal of required forms. 6. Any required drawings, grant forms, descriptive literature, etc. have been included. 7. Any delivery information required is included. 8. If required, the amount of bid bond has been checked, and the bid bond or cashiers check has been included. 9. Addendum have been signed and included, if applicable. 10. Copy of Internet certification that the Vendor is not on the Federal Excluded Parties List System at: www.sam.qov. 11. Immigration Affidavit and a copy of the company's E-Verify profile page or memorandum of understanding. 12. Copies of licenses, equipment lists, subcontractors or any other information as noted in this ITB. 13.The mailing envelope must be addressed to: Procurement Director Collier County Government Purchasing Department 3327 Tamiami Trail E Naples FL 34112 The mailing envelope must be sealed and marked with: • Solicitation: 14-6343—Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) • Opening Date: 11.The bid will be mailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified opening date and time. (Otherwise bid cannot be considered.) ALL COURIER DELIVERED BIDS MUST HAVE THE BID NUMBER AND TITLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE COURIER PACKET. Company Name Signature &Title Date #14-6343 24 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 25 of 30 Coffer Coto-4, r^.ein aistratve Servtces Division Purchasing Attachment 3: Vendor Response Form FROM: Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center Naples, Florida 34112 RE: Solicitation: 14-6343—Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Vendor, hereby declares that the specifications have been fully examined and the Vendor is fully informed in regard to all conditions pertaining to the work to be performed for as per the scope of work. The Vendor further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in this Bid or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that this Bid is made without connection with any other person, company or companies submitting a Bid; and it is all respects fair and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The Vendor proposes and agrees if this Bid is accepted, to contract, either by a County issued purchase order or formal contract, to comply with the requirements in full in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications denoted herein, according to the following unit prices: ***SEE FOLLOWING PAGES*** Any discounts or terms must be shown on the Bid Response Form. Such discounts, if any, will be considered and computed in the tabulation of the bids. In no instance should terms for less than fifteen (15) days payment be offered. Prompt Payment Terms: % Days; Net_ Days ® Bid Response Form is electronic. Please input your prices online. Note: If you choose to bid manually, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your bid response pages. The undersigned do agree that should this Bid be accepted, to execute a formal contract, if required, and present the formal contract to the County Procurement Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of an award. #14-6343 25 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this day of 26 of 30 , 2010 in the County of , in the State of Firm's Complete Legal Name Firm's Dun and Bradstreet Number(DUNS) (Found at www.dnb.com) CCR# or CAGE Code (Found at www.ccr.gov) Florida Certificate of Authority Document Number (http://www.sunbiz.orq) Federal Tax Identification Number Address City, State, Zip Telephone Number FAX Number Check one of the following: ❑ Sole Proprietorship ❑ Corp or P.A. State of ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Signature/Title Type Name of Signature Date Additional Contact Information Send Payments To: (REQUIRED ONLY if different from above) Firm's Complete Legal Name Address City, State,Zip Contact Name Telephone Number FAX Number Email Address #14-6343 26 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 27 of 30 Co ler County Adratissaatve Services Division Attachment 4: Immigration Law Affidavit Certification Solicitation#and Title : 14-6343—Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) This Affidavit is required and should be signed, notarized by an authorized principal of the firm and submitted with formal Invitations to Bid (ITB's) and Request for Proposals (RFP)submittals. Further, Vendors/Bidders are required to enroll in the E-Verify program, and provide acceptable evidence of their enrollment, at the time of the submission of the vendor's/bidder's proposal. Acceptable evidence consists of a copy of the properly completed E-Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company. Failure to include this Affidavit and acceptable evidence of enrollment in the E-Verifv program, may deem the Vendor/ Bidder's proposal as non-responsive. Collier County will not intentionally award County contracts to any vendor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provision contained in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324 a(e) Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act("INA"). Collier County may consider the employment by any vendor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A(e)of the INA. Such Violation by the recipient of the Employment Provisions contained in Section 274A(e) of the INA shall be grounds for unilateral termination of the contract by Collier County. Vendor attests that they are fully compliant with all applicable immigration laws (specifically to the 1986 Immigration Act and subsequent Amendment(s)) and agrees to comply with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding with E-Verify and to provide proof of enrollment in The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify), operated by the Department of Homeland Security in partnership with the Social Security Administration at the time of submission of the Vendor's/ Bidder's proposal. Company Name Print Name Title Signature Date State of County of The foregoing instrument was signed and acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by who has produced as identification. (Print or Type Name) (Type of Identification and Number) Notary Public Signature Printed Name of Notary Public Notary Commission Number/Expiration The signee of this Affidavit guarantees, as evidenced by the sworn affidavit required herein,the truth and accuracy of this affidavit to interrogatories hereinafter made. #14-6343 27 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 28 of 30 Co..._,7er C✓UH ity Admrn sttattve Serves Division Purchasing Attachment 5: Vendor Substitute W—9 Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification In accordance with the Internal Revenue Service regulations, Collier County is required to collect the following information for tax reporting purposes from individuals and companies who do business with the County (including social security numbers if used by the individual or company for tax reporting purposes). Florida Statute 119.071(5) require that the county notify you in writing of the reason for collecting this information, which will be used for no other purpose than herein stated. Please complete all information that applies to your business and return with your quote or proposal. 1. General Information (provide all information) Taxpayer Name (as shown on income tax return) Business Name (if different from taxpayer name) Address City State Zip Telephone FAX Email Order Information Remit/Payment Information Address Address City State Zip City State Zip FAX FAX Email Email 2. Company Status (check only one) _Individual/Sole Proprietor Corporation Partnership _Tax Exempt(Federal income tax-exempt entity _Limited Liability Company under Internal Revenue Service guidelines IRC 501 (c)3) Enter the tax classification (D=Disregarded Entity, C=Corporation, P=Partnership) 3. Taxpayer Identification Number(for tax reporting purposes only) Federal Tax Identification Number(TIN) (Vendors who do not have a TIN,will be required to provide a social security number prior to an award of the contract.) 4. Sign and Date Form Certification: Under penalties of perjury, I certify that the information shown on this form is correct to my knowledge. Signature Date Title Phone Number #14-6343 28 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 29 of 30 C.o f��rer County Admostratve Services Dw sion Purchasing Attachment 6: Insurance and Bonding Requirements Insurance/Bond Type Required Limits 1. ®Worker's Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Compensation Statutory Limits and Requirements 2. ® Employer's Liability $1,000,000 single limit per occurrence 3. ® Commercial General Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the current $1,000,000 single limit per occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate for Bodily Injury ISO form Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. 4. ® Indemnification To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the ContractorNendor/ Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys'fees and paralegals'fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the ContractorNendor/Consultant or anyone employed or utilized by the ContractorNendor/Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 4. ®Automobile Liability $ 1,000,000 Each Occurrence; Bodily Injury& Property Damage, Owned/Non-owned/Hired; Automobile Included 5. ❑ Other insurance as ❑Watercraft $ Per Occurrence noted: ❑ United States Longshoreman's and Harborworker's Act coverage shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ Per Occurrence ❑ Maritime Coverage(Jones Act) shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. $ Per Occurrence ❑Aircraft Liability coverage shall be carried in limits of not less than $5,000,000 each occurrence if applicable to the completion of the Services under this Agreement. $ Per Occurrence ❑ Pollution $ Per Occurrence ❑ Professional Liability $ Per claim and in the aggregate • $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate • $2,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate ❑ Project Professional Liability $ Per Occurrence #14-6343 29 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 30 of 30 ❑Valuable Papers Insurance $ Per Occurrence 6. ® Bid bond Shall be submitted with proposal response in the form of certified funds, cashiers' check or an irrevocable letter of credit, a cash bond posted with the County Clerk, or proposal bond in a sum equal to 5% of the cost proposal. All checks shall be made payable to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on a bank or trust company located in the State of Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 7. ® Performance and For projects in excess of$200,000, bonds shall be submitted with the Payment Bonds executed contract by Proposers receiving award, and written for 100% of the Contract award amount, the cost borne by the Proposer receiving an award. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as "A-" or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders'surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038. 8. ® Vendor shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Vendor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 9. ® Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability where required. 10. ® The Certificate Holder shall be named as Collier County Board of County Commissioners, OR, Board of County Commissioners in Collier County, OR Collier County Government, OR Collier County. The Certificates of Insurance must state the Contract Number, or Project Number, or specific Project description, or must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County. 11. ® Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice required. Vendor's Insurance Statement We understand the insurance requirements of these specifications and that the evidence of insurability may be required within five (5) days of the award of this solicitation. Name of Firm Date Vendor Signature Print Name Insurance Agency Agent Name Telephone Number #14-6343 30 Naples Beach Renourishment(Supply and Delivery) NI- rw O O O N n� _ r� d (d v E n • > O O O O O O u) O OO O 0 0 0 F d V a coop cfl co r co a E E E = c c (n cn cn ~ H E E E a, T J J J 71. 0. W J Cr) c) • = LiJ a' N L U r .6°) U p) p c CO c N U C ~ E Z vM -0d o a� Im1- 0, Na mQ I c N o c 2 U y 0 a) a H tea_ o cao0 Q Zm GaF cnam N CO V' Lf) co CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 1 of 1 AT Ki August 25, 2014 Mr. Chiu Cheng 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399 (850) 245-7585 REFERENCE: Request for FDEP Notice to Proceed,Naples Beach Nourishment 222355-001-JC Mr. Cheng: This letter is to request a Notice to Proceed under FDEP Permit 0222355-001-JC to place 52,452 cubic yards of beach compatible sand on Naples Beach in Collier County between R-monuments R-58A to R-79 utilizing an upland sand source. Included in this submittal are Construction Drawings and Beach Profiles which show this current project is completely within the extents of the previously constructed/permitted beach renourishment project authorized in 2005. There are no proposed impacts from this project, so no mitigation plan is necessary. Upon receipt of a successful bid, Collier County/Atkins will immediately submit the requested upland sand source and mine assay to FDEP for approval. Currently there are three previously FDEP approved sand sources at the Lake Wales, Witherspoon and Immokalee Mines under this permit. It is understood that if the bid is not from a FDEP approved sand source, than a permit modification would be required. Construction is estimated to begin November 2, 2014 and last a period of approximately 4 weeks. The contractor will access the beach at three locations, 1) Lowdermilk Park, 2) 3rd Avenue North, and 3) 17th Avenue South. At each beach offload location, access corridors already exist without creating impacts to existing vegetation or dunes. Please contact me at (813) 281-7689 if you have any questions regarding the current project. Respectfully Submitted, <1'4. Bryan D. Flynn Senior Project Manager,Atk ins cc: Gary McAlpin P.E., Collier County 4030 Boy Scout Blvd.,Suite 700,Tampa, Florida 33607,Phone: 800-477-7275,Fax: 813-636-8583 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 1 of 13 EXHIBIT I: SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FEMA 97.036 Provisions The supplemental conditions contained in this section are intended to cooperate with, to supplement, and to modify the general conditions and other specifications. In cases of disagreement with any other section of this contract, the Supplemental Conditions shall govern. Flow Down of Terms and Conditions from the Grant Agreement Subcontracts: If the vendor subcontracts any of the work required under this Agreement, a copy of the signed subcontract must be forwarded to the Department for review and approval. The vendor agrees to include in the subcontract that (1) the subcontractors is bound by the terms of this Agreement, (ii) the subcontractor is bound by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and (iii) the subcontractor shall hold the Department and Recipient harmless against all claims of whatever nature arising out of the subcontractor's performance of work under this Agreement, to the extent allowed and required by law. The recipient shall document in the quarterly report the subcontractor's progress in performing its work under this agreement. For each subcontract, the Recipient shall provide a written statement to the Department as to whether the subcontractor is a minority vendor as defined in Section 288.703, Fla. Stat. Administrative, Contractual, or Legal Remedies Unless otherwise provided in this contract, all claims, counter-claims, disputes and other matters in question between the local government and the contractor, arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach of it, will be decided by arbitration, if the parties mutually agree, or in a Florida court of competent jurisdiction. Termination for Cause and for Convenience This contract may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this contract through no fault of the terminating party, provided that no termination may be effected unless the other party is given: a) Not less than ten (10) calendar days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate; and b) An opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination. This contract may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the local government for its convenience, provided that the other party is afforded the same notice and consultation opportunity specified in I (a) above. If termination for default is effected by the local government, an equitable adjustmenti n the price for this contract shall be made, but no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work, and any payment due to the contractor at the time of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to the local government because of the contractor's default. If termination for convenience is effected by the local government, the equitable adjustment shall include a reasonable profit for services or other work performed for which profit has not already been included in an invoice. For any termination, the equitable adjustments hall provide for payment to the contractor for 10/1/2012 Revision 2 1 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 2 of 13 EXHIBIT I: SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FEMA 97.036 Provisions services rendered and expenses incurred prior to receipt of the notice of intent to terminate, in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the contractor relating to commitments (e.g., suppliers,s ubcontractors) which had become firm prior to receipt of the notice of intent to terminate. Upon receipt of a termination action under paragraphs (a) or (b) above, the contractor shall • promptly discontinue all affected work (unless the notice directs otherwise) and • deliver or otherwise make available to the local government all data, drawings, reports specifications, summaries and other such information, as may have been accumulated by the contractor in performing this contract, whether completed or in process. Compliance with Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: • The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. • The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, creed, color, or national origin. • The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice, to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or workers' representative of the contractor's commitments under Section 202 of Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. • The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order No. 11246 of Sept. 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. • The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. • In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of such rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be cancelled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order No. 11246 of Sept 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive • Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 03/04/2013-(2) 2 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 3 of 13 EXHIBIT I: SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FEMA 97.036 Provisions • The contractor will include the provisions of Paragraphs (1)through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order No. 11246 of Sept. 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, That in the event the contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the contracting agency, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States." Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act of 1962, 40 U.S.C. 327 et seq. The Contractor agrees it will require that mechanics and laborers (including watchmen and guards) employed on this federally assisted contract be paid wages of not less than one and one-half times their basic wage rates for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in a work week. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 201 et seq. The Contractor agrees it will require that covered employees be paid at least the minimum prescribed wage, and also that they be paid one and one-half times their basic wage rates for all hours worked in excess of the prescribed work-week. Copeland "Anti-Kickback" Act(U.S.C. Section 51) The Contractor agrees to comply with the Anti-Kickback Act of 1968 which outlaws and prescribes penalties for"kickbacks" of wages in federally financed or assisted construction activities. Reporting The contractor will provide any information required to comply with the grantor agency requirements and regulations pertaining to reporting. Patents and Data No reports, maps, or other documents produced in whole or in part under this contract shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of the contractor. The grantor agency and the grantee shall possess all rights to invention or discovery, as well as rights in data which may arise as a result of the contractor's services. 03/04/2013-(2) 3 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 4 of 13 EXHIBIT I: SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FEMA 97.036 Provisions Access to Records The local government,the Florida Department of Emergency Management, the Federal grantor agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any books, documents,p apers, and records of the contractor which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purpose of making audit, examination,ex cerpts, and transcriptions. Retention of Records The contractor shall retain all records relating to this contract for five(5) years after the local government makes final payment and all other pending matters are closed. Clean Air Act, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Executive Order 11738, and US EPA Regulations Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $100,000 shall contain a provision that requires the Contractor or recipient to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under Section 112 and 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857 (h), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations(40 CFR Part 15 and 61). Violations shall be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Energy Efficiency Standards The contractor shall comply with any mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 871); Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) Contract awards that exceed the small purchase threshold and certain other contract awards shall not be made to parties listed on the nonprocurementpo rtion of the General Services Administration's List of parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs in accordance with E.O.s 12549 and 12689, "Debarment and Suspension."This list contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, and contractors declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than E.O. 12549. Contractors with awards that exceed the small purchase threshold shall provide the required certification regarding its exclusion status and that of its principals. Vendors submitting proposals for this purchase must attest that they, and their subcontractors and partners, are not excluded from receiving Federal contracts, certain subcontracts, and certain Federal financial and nonfinancial assistance and benefits, pursuant to the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 6101, note, E.O. 12549, E.O. 12689, 48 CFR 9.404, and each agency's codification of the Common Rule for Nonprocurement suspension and debarment. Contractor's debarment and suspension status will be validated at the System for Award Management at wwvvsarn,,gov and the State of Florida at http:ffdrays.m florida.c rfbusinesslo erationslstatefpurchasingl vendor information. 03/04/2013-(2) 4 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 5 of 13 EXHIBIT I: SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FEMA 97.036 Provisions If appropriate to the project, the Contractor will provide assurances regarding the following: • It will establish safeguards to prohibit discrimination on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C.: 6101-6107)which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age or with respect to otherwise qualified handicapped individuals as provided in Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. • It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties pursuant to Section 112.313 and Section 112.3135, Florida Statutes. • It will comply with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504,29U.S.C.794, regarding non- discrimination. • It will require every building or facility (other than a privately owned residential structure) designed, constructed, or altered with funds provided under this Agreement to comply with the "Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards," (AS) which is Appendix A to 41 fea, Section 101-19.6 for general type buildings and Appendix A to 24 CFR Part 40 for residential structures. The Subgrantee will be responsible for conducting inspections to ensure compliance with these specifications by the contractor. • It will comply with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C.: 1681- • 1683 and 1685 - 1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex. • It will comply with the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4521-45-94) relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism. • It will comply with 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and • 290 ee-3) as amended, that relate to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records. • It will comply with Lead-Based Paint Poison Prevention Act (42 U.S.C.: 4821 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead based paint in construction of rehabilitation or residential structures. • It will comply with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (P.L. 94-163; 42 U.S.C. 6201-6422), and the provisions of the state Energy Conservation Plan adopted pursuant thereto. • It will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the National • Environmental Policy Act of 1969,42 U.S.C. 4321-4347. • It will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with the Preservation of Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1966, 16 U.S.C. 469a, et seq. • It will comply with the environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 300f-300j) regarding the protection of underground water sources. • It will comply with the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7401-7642. • It will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7419-7626. • It will comply with the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531-1544. • It will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4728-763. • It will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, 16 U.S.C. 1271-1287, related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. • It will comply with the following Executive Orders: EO 11514 (NEPA); EO 11738 (violating facilities); EO 11988 (Floodplain Management); EO 11990 (Wetlands); and EO 12898 (Environmental Justice). • It will comply with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act of 1977, 16 U.S.C. 3510. • It will assure project consistency with the approved state program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 1451-1464. • It will comply with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958; 16 U.S.C. 661-666. 03/04/2013-(2) 5 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 6 of 13 EXHIBIT I: SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FEMA 97.036 Certifications and Forms THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS NEED TO BE RETURNED WITH SOLICIATION DOCUMENTS BY DEADLINE TO BE CONSIDERED RESPONSIVE 1. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters Primary Covered Transactions 2. General Grant Clauses 3. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities 4. Conflict of Interest Affidavit 5. Anticipated DBE or M/WBE Participation Statement 6. Construction Contractors Bid Opportunity List 03/04/2013-(2) 6 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 7 of 13 COLLIER COUNTY Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters Primary Covered Transactions (1) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (I)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions(Federal, State or local)terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Name Project Name Title Project Number Firm Tax ID Number Street Address DUNS Number City, State, Zip Signature Date 03/04/2013-(2) 7 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 8 of 13 Collier County Acknowledgement of Terms, Conditions, and Grant Clauses Flow Down of Terms and Conditions from the Grant Agreement Subcontracts: If the vendor subcontracts any of the work required under this Agreement, a copy of the signed subcontract must be available to the Department for review and approval. The vendor agrees to include in the subcontract that (1) the subcontractor is bound by the terms of this Agreement, (ii) the subcontractor is bound by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and (iii) the subcontractor shall hold the Department and Recipient harmless against all claims of whatever nature arising out of the subcontractor's performance of work under this Agreement, to the extent allowed and required by law. The recipient shall document in the quarterly report the subcontractor's progress in performing its work under this agreement. For each subcontract, the Recipient shall provide a written statement to the Department as to whether the subcontractor is a minority vendor as defined in Section 288.703, Fla. Stat. Grant Clauses On behalf of my firm, I acknowledge, and agree to perform all of the specifications and grant requirements identified in this solicitation document(s). Vendor/Contractor Name Date Authorized Signature Address Solicitation Contract# 10/1/2012 Revision 2 8 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 9 of 13 COLLIER COUNTY CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING The undersigned (Vendor/ Contractor) certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,the making of any Federal grant,the making of any Federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,amendment,or modification of any Federal contract,grant, loan,or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for making lobbying contacts to an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form--LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions [as amended by "Government wide Guidance for New Restrictions on Lobbying," 61 Fed. Reg. 1413 (1/19/96). Note: Language in paragraph (2)herein has been modified in accordance with Section 10 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995(P.L. 104-65,to be codified at 2 U.S.C. 1601,etseq.)] (3)The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31, U.S.C. § 1352 (as amended by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995). Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and not more than$100,000 for each such failure. [Note: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 1352(c)(1)-(2)(A), any person who makes a prohibited expenditure or fails to file or amend a required certification or disclosure form shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such expenditure or failure.] The Vendor/Contractor, , certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure, if any. In addition,the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C.A 3801,et seq., apply to this certification and disclosure,if any. Signature of Vendor/Contractor's Authorized Official Name and Title of Vendor/Contractor's Authorized Official Date 03/04/2013-(2) 9 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 10 of 13 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CERTIFICATION Collier County Solicitation No. , hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, neither I nor my spouse, dependent child, general partner, or any organization for which I am serving as an officer, director, trustee, general partner or employee, or any person or organization with whom I am negotiating or have an arrangement concerning prospective employment has a financial interest in this matter. I further certify to the best of my knowledge that this matter will not affect the financial interests of any member of my household.Also, to the best of my knowledge, no member of my household; no relative with whom I have a close relationship; no one with whom my spouse, parent or dependent child has or seeks employment; and no organization with which I am seeking a business relationship nor which I now serve actively or have served within the last year are parties or represent a party to the matter. I also acknowledge my responsibility to disclose the acquisition of any financial or personal interest as described above that would be affected by the matter, and to disclose any interest I, or anyone noted above, has in any person or organization that does become involved in, or is affected at a later date by, the conduct of this matter. Name Signature Position Date Privacy Act Statement Title I of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978(5 U.S.C.App.), Executive Order 12674 and 5 CFR Part 2634, Subpart I require the reporting of this information.The primary use of the information on this form is for review by officials of The Justice Department to determine compliance with applicable federal conflict of interest laws and regulations.Additional disclosures of the information on this report may be made: (1)to a federal, state or local law enforcement agency if the Justice Department becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulations; (2)to a court or party in a court or federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party or in order to comply with a judge-issued subpoena; (3)to a source when necessary to obtain information relevant to a conflict of interest investigation or decision; (4)to the National Archives and Records Administration or the General Services Administration in records management inspections; (5)to the Office of Management and Budget during legislative coordination on private relief legislation; and (6)in response to a request for discovery or for the appearance of a witness in a judicial or administrative proceeding, if the information is relevant to the subject matter. This confidential certification will not be disclosed to any requesting person unless authorized by law. See also the OGE/GOVT-2 executive branch-wide Privacy Act system of records. 10 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 11 of 13 COLLIER COUNTY ANTICIPATED DBE OR M/WBE PARTICIPATION STATEMENT DBE/MBE/WBE Status will be verified. Unverifiable statuses will require the PRIME to either proivde a revised statement or provide source documentation that validates a status. A. PRIME VENDOR/CONTRACTOR INFORMATION PRIME NAME PRIME FEID NUMBER CONTRACT DOLLAR AMOUNT IS THE PRIME A FLORIDA-CERTIFIED DISADVANTAGED, IS THE ACTIVITY OF THIS CONTRACT... MINORITY OR WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE? DBE? Y N CONSTRUCTION? Y N (DBE/MBE/WBE) OR HAVE A SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS 8A CERTIFICATION FROM THE SMALL BUSINESS MBE? Y N CONSULTATION? Y N ADMINISTRATION? WBE? Y N OTHER? Y N SDB 8A? Y N IS THIS SUBMISSION A REVISION? Y N IF YES,REVISION NUMBER___ _ B. IF PRIME HAS SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER WHO IS DBE/MBE, PRIME IS TO COMPLETE THIS NEXT SECTION DBE M/WBE SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER TYPE OF WORK OR ETHNICITY CODE SUB/SUPPLIER PERCENT OF CONTRACT NAME SPECIALTY (See Below) DOLLAR AMOUNT DOLLARS DBE M/WBE DBE M/WBE DBE M/WBE DBE M/WBE DBE M/WBE DBE M/WBE TOTALS: ,C. SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY PRIME VENDOR/CONTRACTOR NAME OF SUBMITTER DATE TITLE OF SUBMITTER EMAIL ADDRESS OF PRIME(SUBMITTER) TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER NOTE:This information is used to track and report anticipated DBE or MBE participation in federally-funded contracts. The anticipated DBE or MBE amount is voluntary and will not become part of the contractual terms. This form must be submitted at time of response to a solicitation. If and when awarded a County contract,the prime will be asked to update the information for the grant compliance files. ETHNICITY CCF` Black American BA, Hispanic American HA Native American NA Subcont.Asian American SAA Asian-Pacific American APA Non-Minority Women NMW Other:not of any other group listed O D.SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY COLLIER COUNTY DEPARTMENT NAME COLLIER CONTRACT#(IFB/RFP or PO/REQ) FUNDING SOURCE ACCEPTED BY: DATE CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 17 of 13 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS BID OPPORTUNITY LIST 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than$1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between $1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between $5- $10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than$1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between$1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between$5- $10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than $1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between $1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between $5-$10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant El More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: El Non-DBE ❑ Less than$1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between$1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between$5-$10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than $1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between $1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between $5- $10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 12 CAC September 11,2014 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS BID OPPORTUNITY LIST 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than $1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between$1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between$5-$10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than$1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between $1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between $5- $10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than $1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between $1 - $5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between$5- $10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than$1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between $1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between$5- $10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 1. Federal Tax ID Number: 6. ❑ DBE 8. Annual Gross Receipts 2. Firm Name: ❑ Non-DBE ❑ Less than $1 million 3. Phone: ❑ Between $1 -$5 million 4. Address: ❑ Between $5-$10 million 7. ❑ Subcontractor ❑ Between $10-$15 million ❑ Subconsultant ❑ More than $15 million 5. Year Firm Established: 13 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 1 of 52 EXHIBIT J: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 14-6343 — NAPLES BEACH RENOURISHMENT AUGUST 2014 COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Collier County Government 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Design Professional: ATKINS 4030 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 700 Tampa, Florida 33607 Bryan D. Flynn, P.E.NO. 70856 DATE CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 2 of 52 COLLIER COUNTY NAPLES BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT PROVIDE AND TRANSPORT SAND COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 14-6343 AUGUST 2014 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS PART I. INTRODUCTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION TP-1 2. SCOPE TP-4 3. SUBMITTALS AND NOTIFICATIONS SUMMARY TP-5 4. ORDER OF WORK, PROJECT SCHEDULE AND ACCEPTANCE SECTIONS TP-7 5. PROJECT MANAGER, DESIGN CONSULTANT AND SAND SUPPLIER TP-7 6. PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY SAND SUPPLIER TP-7 7. SUPERINTENDENT TP-8 8. PHYSICAL DATA TP-8 9. STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS, EASEMENTS AND LICENSES TP-10 10. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY, WORK AND PERSONS TP-10 11. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC AND PUBLIC SAFETY TP-12 PART II. PAYMENT STANDARDS 12. PAYMENT FOR MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION TP-14 13. RETAINAGE TP-21 14. RIGHT TO REFUSE RECOMMENDATION FOR PAYMENT TP-21 15. FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT TP-22 16. MISCELLANEOUS TP-25 TP-i CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 3 of 52 COLLIER COUNTY NAPLES BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT PROVIDE AND TRANSPORT SAND COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 14- TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T) PART III. QUALITY CONTROL AND OPERATIONS 17. SAND SUPPLIER QUALITY CONTROL TP-26 18. QUALITY CONTROL REPORTING TP-28 19. DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TP-28 20. FINAL CLEAN UP TP-29 21. NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS TP-29 22. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TP-29 PART IV. MATERIALS 23. CHARACTER OF MATERIAL TP-30 PART V. EXECUTION 24. TRANSPORT OF EXCAVATED MATERIALS TP-34 25. MISCELLANEOUS TP-42 TP-ii CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 4 of 52 COLLIER COUNTY NAPLES BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT PROVIDE AND TRANSPORT SAND COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 14-6343 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T) PART VI. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 26. SCOPE TP-43 27. QUALITY CONTROL TP-43 29. SUBCONTRACTORS TP-44 30. NOTIFICATION TP-44 31. MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES TP-50 32. NOISE CONTROL TP-51 33. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN TP-51 PART VII. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 34. SAFETY GUIDELINES TP-54 35. ELECTRICITY TP-57 36. FIRE EXTINGUISHER-MOBILE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TP-57 TP-iii CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 5 of 52 COLLIER COUNTY NAPLES BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT PROVIDE AND TRANSPORT SAND COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 14-6343 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T) LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 2014 DESIGN VOLUMES TP-1 TABLE 2 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE TP-3 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF ACCEPTABLE UPLAND SAND QUALITY TP-31 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP TP-2 LIST OF APPENDICES I QUALITY CONTROL REPORT FORM II GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION II-A INFORMATION ON UPLAND SAND SOURCES 11-B QA/QC PLAN FOR UPLAND SAND SOURCE III FILL DISTRIBUTION BY R-MONUMENT IV APPROVED TRUCK ROUTES VI PERMITS AND BIOLOGICAL OPINIONS VI-A ORIGINAL FDEP PERMIT(2005) VI-B ORIGINAL USACE PERMIT(2005) VI-C STATE PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION TP-iv CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 6 of 52 COLLIER COUNTY NAPLES BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECT PROVIDE AND TRANSPORT SAND COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 14-6343 TECHNICAL PROVISIONS August 2014 PART I. INTRODUCTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The project is located on the southwest coast of Florida bordering the Gulf of Mexico within Collier County, Florida. Collier County is approximately 115 miles south of the entrance of Tampa Bay and about 100 miles west of Miami, Florida. The County is bordered to the west and southwest by the Gulf of Mexico, to the south by Monroe County, to the east by Dade and Broward Counties, and to the north by Lee and Hendry Counties. The project area encompasses approximately 4 miles of coastline between Doctors Pass and Gordon Pass. The total volume of material is 52,452 cubic yards (78,678 tons) of beach quality sand. The project quantities and lengths are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1. Payment is by tons delivered to the beach ends. Table 1. 2014 Design Volumes Project Area Project Gaps Design Pay Weight Limits Volume(c.y.) (ton) R-58A Naples Beach to see plots 52,452 78,678 R-79 TP-1 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 7 of 52 DOCTORS PASS = R58A-300 to R58+325 — 1 LOWDERMILK PARK R59+300 to R63+600 023 0 ■ -04---- 3RD AVE NORTH R67+3°° 11? 67+300to R69+500 - i '''' f iii : R71+50 to R73+300 I A2 NAPLES PIER ----. R74+400 to R78+400 18TH AVE SOUTH Figure 1. Location Map TP-2 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 8 of 52 The nourishment project will be constructed using an upland sand source. The project has three approved upland sand sources: Immokalee (Stewart), Witherspoon (Vulcan), and Lake Wales (Cemex), but not limited, to these three mines as long as it meets FDEP QA/QC qualifications. It is assumed that the sand will have no greater than a 6% moisture content, leading to a relationship of 1.5 tons/cy for sand delivery from the pit. Any truck that is loaded with a moisture content greater that 6%, the tonnage and payment will be adjust accordingly. Construction Time: The schedule for construction and key milestones are listed in Table 2. Construction will be in a continuous north to south direction. No timeout for weather delays or storm events except force majeure events. SAND SUPPLIER mobilizes and begins commencement of stockpiling beach compatible sand by September 15, 2014. SAND SUPPLIER shall be prepared to commence sand transport activities to the beach by November 1, 2014. The hours of operation are from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., with no work being allowed on Sundays. No truck hauling or beach activities will be permitted the Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday of Thanksgiving or the week of Christmas. SAND SUPPLIER manages the supply and haul events to the beach. If final completion of work occurs after 12/31/2014, the SAND SUPPLIER is assessed Liquidated Damages (LD's) of$2,600 per day until final completion occurs. The county reserves the right to cancel the contract if final completion does not occur by 12/5/2014. Completion is beach placement of the sand quantities shown on the bid form. Table 2. Project Schedule Description Date Bid solitic:ation 8/7/2014 Award contract 9/9/2014 Commence staging storage mobilization 9/15/2014 Commence sand placement 11/1/2014 Substantial completion 11/26/2014 Liquidated damages 12/5/2014 2. SCOPE. The SAND SUPPLIER shall provide the sand, trucks and support equipment, labor, equipment, supplies, and materials to perform all operations in connection with providing and transporting sand as indicated in the Plans and required by the Contract Documents. Individual truck identification and certified scale records along with Chain of Custody (truck tracking) documentation must accompany each truck delivery. No payment will be made for delivered quantities that exceed the bid quantity. The SAND SUPPLIER will not be paid for any tons in excess of this quantity, unless a written change order is prepared and approved by the COUNTY. TP-3 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 9 of 52 The restoration project for Collier County will use dump trucks to haul sand to the project area from pre-approved upland sand source(s). Sand will be placed onto the beach using a conveyor system or dumped directly from the trucks. Unloading and dumping operations will occur at approved unloading locations on or near public roads and beach access ways. The stock pile created will be used to load trucks capable of moving along the beach to the fill site. No dump trucks supplied under this contract (over-the-road trucks) will drive along the beach. The Sand Placement Contractor (separate contract) will be responsible for providing mats and layout a turnaround area, if trucks are to dump on the beach. As part of the bidding process, the bidders shall provide a work plan that describes the operation and its management from sand pit to approved unloading locations. The plan shall describe the means of finishing the project in the time available. The plan shall include a proposed truck route that states how the trucks will access I-75 from the mine location. **Note: For the Immokalee Mine, the route will be Corkscrew Rd., to Alico Bypass, to I-175 at exit 128. Other mines must submit routes to be approved by Collier County prior to hauling.** The plan must also show how the SAND SUPPLIER intends to maintain the quality of the material consistent with these Specifications and the Sediment Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan. The plan shall address proposed routes, staging, capacity and productivity, quality control and the bidders experience with similar beach projects. The SAND SUPPLIER must also furnish with their bid an example of a truck ticket management system (truck tracking) that the mine and truck drivers will use and show how it will track the weight, volume and moisture content of each truck delivered to each beach each day. The truck tracking system must have the ability to post data in an electronic and hard-copy format that can be reconciled on a daily-basis. The system must also account for pre-loaded trucks for the next day's delivery. The work plan shall be submitted with the bid, or the bid will be deemed unresponsive. 3. SUBMITTALS AND NOTIFICATIONS SUMMARY. The SAND SUPPLIER shall provide the following list of submittals and notifications to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: 3.1 Quality Control Reports - The SAND SUPPLIER shall provide a daily quality control report (Appendix I) of the progress of the Work during construction. 3.2 Unsuitable Material - Collier County will provide daily inspections at the mine and take samples from trucks at the mine and at the beach. The SAND SUPPLIER shall notify the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL of the discovery of any unsuitable material delivered or within the fill area. 3.3 Pre-Construction Video - Copies of the pre-construction access road, structure, and vegetation condition video and/or photography, and other documentation shall be provided 10 days prior to the start of construction. 3.4 Post-Construction Video- Copies of the post-construction access road, structure, and vegetation condition video and or photography, and other documentation TP-4 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 10 of 52 shall be provided within 10 days after construction is complete. 3.5 Quality Control Plan —submitted 14 days prior to the start of work. 3.6 Contact List—submitted 14 days prior to the start of work. 3.7 List of Subcontractors—submitted 14 days prior to the start of work. 3.8 Accident Prevention Plan—submitted 14 days prior to the start of work. 3.9 Environmental Protection Plan—submitted 14 days prior to the start of work. 3.10 Hurricane and Severe Storm Plan—submitted 14 days prior to the start of work. 3.11 Order of Work and Project Schedule - The SAND SUPPLIER shall submit a written order of Work and project schedule to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER. 3.12 Request for Clarification of Interpretation of Contract Documents — written notice(not phone or email) 3.13 Notification of Occurrence of Delays in Work— written notice within 48 hours of incident. 3.14 Application for Progress Payment 3.15 Reports of all Inspections, Tests and Remedial Actions 3.16 Technical Dispute Notification 3.17 Notice of Completion of Work 3.18 Application for Final Payment 3.19 Maintenance of Traffic Plan — 14 days prior to start of work 3.20 Other Submittals. The Contract documents may require other submittals. 4. ORDER OF WORK, PROJECT SCHEDULE AND ACCEPTANCE SECTIONS. 4.1 Order of Work and Project Schedule. The SAND SUPPLIER shall provide a project schedule to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER a minimum of five (5) days prior to the pre-construction meeting. The order of work may be modified at the pre-construction meeting to accommodate local priorities. The project TP-5 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 11 of 52 schedule shall indicate, at a minimum, start of Work, fill transport completion date, and completion of all Work. The project schedule shall be updated weekly during construction and submitted at the weekly meeting so that the County, Sand Placement Contractor and local property owners can plan for the SAND SUPPLIER's activity. 5. PROJECT MANAGER,DESIGN CONSULTANT AND SAND SUPPLIER. The term SAND SUPPLIER is used in lieu of SUCCESSFUL BIDDER in this Exhibit. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will be subordinate to the COUNTY's PROJECT MANAGER, and the authority of the PROJECT MANAGER described in the General Terms and Conditions will not be diminished by any statement in this Exhibit. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will refer decisions to the PROJECT MANAGER when appropriate. Inspectors will work for the PROJECT MANAGER and carry out his plan at the work site. Definitions are provided in paragraph 1 of the Instruction to Bidders. 6. PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY SAND SUPPLIER. 6.1 SAND SUPPLIER Participation in the Work. There is no minimum amount of SAND SUPPLIER participation in the project. 6.2 Continuous Construction. The SAND SUPPLIER shall maintain at the project site and on the job, the materials, equipment and personnel required to continuously provide and transport sand that shall be used for construction of the project. Under no circumstances will the SAND SUPPLIER remove their equipment, materials, subcontractors, and personnel from the mine site without the written consent of the PROJECT MANAGER, unless one or more of the following occurs: the project is complete; weather conditions require movement from the project site; a condition exists which threatens the safety and welfare of personnel or threatens equipment; repair or fueling of equipment is required; or the time frame provided for project construction in the State of Florida or Federal permits has expired. 6.2.1 Capacity. The SAND SUPPLIER shall meet the standards for capacity, productivity and ability to maintain it throughout the time allotted for construction. 7. SUPERINTENDENT. The SAND SUPPLIER shall propose, in writing to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER, the name and qualifications of the superintendent to receive the PROJECT MANAGER's and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's instructions. There will only be one superintendent. The PROJECT MANAGER and/or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL may reject the superintendent proposed by the SAND SUPPLIER. If the proposed superintendent is rejected, the SAND SUPPLIER will propose an alternate superintendent. Said instructions, once received TP-6 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 12 of 52 by the SAND SUPPLIER's superintendent, will be legally binding on the SAND SUPPLIER pursuant of this Contract. A superintendent of the SAND SUPPLIER must be at the mine project area at all times during project construction or otherwise make himself available to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL at all times during project construction. Under no circumstances will any element of project construction occur without the presence of a superintendent at the project site. An assistant superintendent can be proposed by the SAND SUPPLIER to cover for the superintendent during his absences, but the assistant superintendent cannot change plans and agreements made by the superintendent with the PROJECT MANAGER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 8. PHYSICAL DATA. 8.1 Information and Data. Information and data furnished or referred to in the Contract Documents are furnished for the SAND SUPPLIER's information. However, it is expressly understood that the PROJECT MANAGER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will not be responsible for any interpretation or conclusion drawn therefrom by the SAND SUPPLIER. Likewise, the PROJECT MANAGER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will not be responsible for any information provided to the SAND SUPPLIER by any information agency or other party. 8.2 Weather Conditions. The project area may be affected by tropical storms and hurricanes primarily from June through November, and by stormy and/or rainy weather, including severe thunderstorms, during any time of the year. The SAND SUPPLIER shall be responsible for obtaining information concerning rain and wind conditions that could influence safety, sand mining/dredging operations prior to making a bid. A list of publications containing climatological and meteorological observations and data for the project area is provided below. Other publications or information sources are available in addition to the following: 8.2.1 Local Climatological Data-Monthly Summary published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Asheville, NC. Subscription price and ordering information available from the National Climatic Data Center, Federal Building, Asheville, NC 22801. This publication gives hourly wind speed and direction observations. The Annual Summary gives a summary of the observations for the period of record. 8.2.2 Summary of Synoptic Meteorological Observations: North American Coastal Marine Areas Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. Produced by Naval Weather Service, U.S. Department of Commerce. Distributed by National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce. 8.3 Land Access to the Project Site. The SAND SUPPLIER is responsible for adhering to all weight and traffic regulations on all roadways. An official map of city roads is shown in Appendix IV. The SAND SUPPLIER shall adhere to the truck route TP-7 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 13 of 52 map provided within Collier County and the City of Naples. Access to the beach is designated on the truck route map. Naples Beach can be accessed from Lowdermilk, 3`d Avenue North, and 18th Avenue South. The only approved routes into the beach area are shown in Appendix IV unless changed by the COUNTY in writing. The SAND SUPPLIER will provide a plan for maintenance of traffic (MOT) 14 days prior to the start of work. The SAND SUPPLIER will work with local authorities for MOT and damage avoidance. The SAND SUPPLIER as part of the MOT plan is expected to institute a vehicle safety and inspection program utilizing state and local resources. Additionally, off-duty policemen may be required as part of the Maintenance of Traffic Plan to direct traffic depending on mine location and traffic patterns. Funds should be included in the MOT plan to accommodate this requirement whenever truck hauling is in operation. 9. STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS,EASEMENTS AND LICENSES. The PROJECT MANAGER will obtain the Florida Department of Environmental Protection permit and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit. Any other licenses or approvals required for the prosecution of the Work shall be secured and paid for by the SAND SUPPLIER. The SAND SUPPLIER shall obtain any and all approvals required to conduct work on the streets of the COUNTY, City of Naples and State of Florida. 10. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY,WORK AND PERSONS. 10.1 Protection of Property. The SAND SUPPLIER shall, at its own cost and expense, support and protect all public and private property that may be encountered or endangered in the prosecution of the Work herein contemplated. The SAND SUPPLIER shall repair to its original condition and make good any damage caused to any such property by reason of its operation, to the satisfaction of the PROJECT MANAGER and any owner, before the PROJECT MANAGER provides final payment to the SAND SUPPLIER. The SAND SUPPLIER shall film or photograph pre and post construction videos to document site conditions of the roads (truck routes). Based upon the videos, damages will be determined. It is anticipated that some damage will be caused by truck haul operations. A punchlist of damages will be given to the SAND SUPPLIER to repair prior to project completion. 10.2 SAND SUPPLIER Responsibility. The SAND SUPPLIER shall at all times guard the Work site or sites and adjacent properties from any damage whatsoever in connection with this Contract whether arising from direct operations under this Contract, theft, vandalism or any cause whatsoever. The SAND SUPPLIER shall at all times TP-8 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 14 of 52 protect its own Work from damage. The SAND SUPPLIER is responsible for protection of roads and associated property and to repair such when damaged. 10.3 Protection of Persons. The SAND SUPPLIER shall be accountable for any damages resulting from its operation during the performance of this Contract. The SAND SUPPLIER shall be fully responsible for the protection and safety of all persons including members of the public, employees of the OWNER, the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and his employees, and employees of other contractors or subcontractors, in the area of the Work; also including people on floating equipment such as boats or other vessels at the mine site. 10.4 Risk of Loss. The Work and everything pertaining thereto shall be performed at the sole risk and cost of the SAND SUPPLIER from commencement until final payment by the PROJECT MANAGER. Any specific references contained in the Contract Documents, including the Plans, that the SAND SUPPLIER shall be responsible at its sole risk and cost for the Work or any part thereof are not intended to be, nor shall they be construed to be, an exclusive listing of the circumstances in which the SAND SUPPLIER bears the risk of loss, but rather they are intended only to be examples. 10.5 Weather Events and Other Risks. Only sand loss or damage arising out of the nature of the Work, or from the action of the elements, or from weather events, hurricanes, tropical storms, or any other natural or existing circumstances either known or unforeseen, that may be encountered in the prosecution of the Work, shall be sustained and borne by Collier County. The production and transportation costs of these loss or damages along with all other losses arising out of the nature of the Work, or from the action of the elements, or from weather events, hurricanes, tropical storms, or any other natural or existing circumstances either known or unforeseen, that may be encountered in the prosecution of the Work, shall be sustained and borne by the SAND SUPPLIER at its own cost and expense. All other loss or damage besides sand related is borne by the SAND SUPPLIER. 10.6 No Claim Against OWNER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. The SAND SUPPLIER shall have no claim against the OWNER, PROJECT MANAGER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL because of any damage or loss to the Work or SAND SUPPLIER's materials, equipment or supplies, including no claim for loss or damage due to simultaneous work by others, and the SAND SUPPLIER shall be responsible for the complete restoration of damaged Work to its original condition complying with the Contract Documents. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Contract, this obligation shall exist without regard to the availability of any insurance, either of the PROJECT MANAGER, DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or the SAND SUPPLIER. 11. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC AND PUBLIC SAFETY. The SAND SUPPLIER shall provide and maintain fencing, barricades, warning signals, and/or a flag person as required by local, State, or Federal regulations or as required by the plans or TP-9 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 15 of 52 specifications in the project area to ensure public safety. If the SAND SUPPLIER is not able to keep and maintain the public at a safe distance from construction activity, the SAND SUPPLIER is to notify the OWNER and request assistance in controlling public access to the construction site. The SAND SUPPLIER will develop and submit to the COUNTY a maintenance of traffic plan acceptable to the COUNTY and City of Naples (Appendix IV) 14 days prior to the start of work. The plan will direct traffic to minimize impacts entering the municipal area to a staging/holding and finally onto the dump site. The trucks will be given no special preference over normal City traffic. The plan must also include a description of truck haul management methods. All trucks must be inspected by the Collier and Lee County Sheriffs Offices and approved by the FDOT and marked with a star during operations associated with this project. The star must be removed during haul operations for other projects. At the end of day, SAND SUPPLIER shall provide the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL with a list of trucks that will be loaded that night for delivery the following morning. Split staging of the trucks at the mine must be included and tracked carefully to help minimize backlog during morning staging. The SAND SUPPLIER must also furnish with their bid an example of a truck ticket management system (truck tracking)that the mine and truck drivers will use and show how it will track the weight, volume and moisture content of each truck delivered to each beach each day. The SAND SUPPLIER may be required to include off-duty police officers to direct and control traffic. Their presence may be required anytime hauling operations are taking place and during morning departure activities. Payment will be a SAND SUPPLIER responsibility. TP-10 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 16 of 52 PART II. PAYMENT STANDARDS 12. PAYMENT FOR PROVIDING SAND. 12.1 Description. The Work specified in this Section consists of the preparatory Work and operations required for processing and stockpiling sand. As part of this Work the SAND SUPPLIER shall: (a) process the sand to meet the specifications identified in Table 3, Section 24.5 and Appendix II-B — QA/QC Plan for Upland Sand Source, (b) conduct sediment testing consistent with the requirements as identified in the Sediment Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan and (c) stockpile the sand for transport to the project site upon written authorization by the COUNTY. 12.2 Unit Price Contract Items. No adjustments shall be made in the Contract Price for changes ordered by the PROJECT MANAGER that cause a decrease or increase in the amount of the Work that is less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the estimated sand quantity set forth in the Contract Documents. An equitable adjustment may be made in the Contract Price for Unit Price Contracts if changes ordered by the PROJECT MANAGER cause the applicable quantity set forth in the Contract Documents to be decreased by more than twenty-five percent (25%). Such adjustments may be made only for that portion of work that is less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the estimated quantity, and shall be supported by data provided by the SAND SUPPLIER to the PROJECT MANAGER which demonstrated justification for the adjustment in Unit Price. 12.3 Basis for Payment. The COUNTY will pay for the sand fill weight (tons) delivered to the beach at each unloading operation on a cost pass through basis from the sand supplier. Individual truck identification and certified scale records along with Chain of Custody documentation (truck weight ticket) must accompany each truck delivery. No payment will be made for delivered quantities that exceed the bid quantity. The SAND SUPPLIER will not be paid for any amount of sand (tons) in excess of this quantity, unless a written Change Order is prepared and approved by the COUNTY. Payment for beach fill placement will be based upon the tonnage of sand delivered to each unloading operation as identified via weight tickets. The County and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will verify the pay quantities provided by the SAND SUPPLIER based on weight tickets. 13. PAYMENT FOR TRANSPORT OF SAND. General. The Work specified in this Section consists of the operations required to transport sand from the upland mine to the specified unloading operations at Naples Beach Renourishment project site. 13.1 Unit Price Contract Items. No adjustments shall be made in the Contract Price for changes ordered by the PROJECT MANAGER that cause a decrease or increase in TP-11 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 17 of 52 the amount of the Work that is less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the estimated fill quantity set forth in the Contract Documents. An equitable adjustment may be made in the Contract Price for Unit Price Contracts if changes ordered by the PROJECT MANAGER cause the applicable quantity set forth in the Contract Documents to be decreased by more than twenty-five percent (25%). Such adjustments may be made only for that portion of work that is less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the estimated quantity, and shall be supported by data provided by the SAND SUPPLIER to the PROJECT MANAGER which demonstrated justification for the adjustment in Unit Price. 13.2 Basis for Payment. The COUNTY will pay for the sand fill weight (tons) delivered to the beach at each unloading operation on a cost pass through basis from the sand supplier. Individual truck identification and certified scale records along with Chain of Custody documentation must accompany each truck delivery. No payment will be made for delivered quantities that exceed the bid quantity. The SAND SUPPLIER will not be paid for any amount of sand (tons) in excess of this quantity, unless a written Change Order is prepared and approved by the COUNTY. Payment for beach fill placement will be based upon the tonnage of sand delivered to each unloading operation as identified via weight tickets. The COUNTY and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will verify the pay quantities provided by the SAND SUPPLIER based on weight tickets. 13.3 Progress Payments. Monthly progress payments shall be based on weight tickets which have been approved by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and verified via truck tracking software/process. The SAND SUPPLIER will be eligible for the initial progress payment when a minimum of six thousand (6,000) tons has been delivered to the project site and accepted by the PROJECT MANAGER. The SAND SUPPLIER shall submit to the PROJECT MANAGER and the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL for review, not more often than monthly, an Application for Progress Payment filled out and signed by the SAND SUPPLIER. The Application shall describe the Work completed and accompanied by such supporting documentation as is required by the Contract Documents and also as may reasonably be required by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 14. RETAINAGE. A retainage of 10% of the payment application amount shall be withheld from each payment for sand provided and transported to the project site. Upon final acceptance and satisfaction of all requirements of the Contract Documents, the withheld retainage shall be included in the final payment. 15. RIGHT TO REFUSE RECOMMENDATION FOR PAYMENT. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL may refuse to recommend the whole or any part of any payment if, in his opinion, such representations to the PROJECT MANAGER would be inaccurate. The TP-12 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 18 of 52 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL may also refuse to recommend any payment because of subsequently discovered evidence or the results of subsequent observations, measurements or tests, or nullify any such payment previously recommended to such extent as may be necessary in the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's opinion to protect the PROJECT MANAGER from loss because: 15.1 The Work is defective, inconsistent with the project drawing and specifications; 15.2 Written claims have been made against PROJECT MANAGER, COUNTY or liens have been filed in connection with the Work; 15.3 The Contract price has been reduced because of modifications; 15.4 The PROJECT MANAGER has been required to correct defective Work or complete the Work; 15.5 The SAND SUPPLIER has not performed the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents; 15.6 The SAND SUPPLIER has failed to make payment to subcontractors, or for labor, materials, or equipment. 15.7 The SAND SUPPLIER is claiming additional placement of sand for payment beyond that measured and calculated using the procedure established in the Contract Documents for computation of fill quantities for payment purposes. 15.8 The SAND SUPPLIER is claiming additional payment for any reason not previously agreed to by the PROJECT MANAGER. 15.9 The SAND SUPPLIER has not repaired damages caused by the SAND SUPPLIER's operation to the satisfaction of the PROJECT MANAGER and/or affected private property owner. 16. FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT. 16.1 Road and Infrastructure Repair Before Final Payment. Roads, beach access and infrastructure impacted by the SAND SUPPLIER's operation shall be repaired to a level acceptable to the City of Naples and the COUNTY prior to final payment. Truck haul sand operations will cause impacts needing repairs, unless infrastructure is protected during construction. 16.2 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's Recommendation for Final Payment. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's recommendation of final payment for the project will constitute a representation by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL to the PROJECT MANAGER that, in the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's opinion, the conditions precedent to the SAND SUPPLIER's being entitled to final payment as set forth in the Contract Documents have been fulfilled. 16.3 Completion of Work. Upon written notice from SAND SUPPLIER that the Work is complete, the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will observe the Work within three (3) days of the receipt of the written notice from the SAND SUPPLIER and, if required, will notify the SAND SUPPLIER in writing of all particulars in which this inspection reveals TP-13 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 19 of 52 that the Work is incomplete or defective. The SAND SUPPLIER shall immediately take such measures as are necessary to remedy such deficiencies. 16.4 Application for Final Payment. After the SAND SUPPLIER has completed all such corrections to the satisfaction of the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER and delivered any required quality control reports or data requested by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, guarantees, bonds, certificates of inspection, marked-up record documents and all other documents as required by the Contract Documents or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, and after the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL has indicated that the Work is acceptable to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER, the SAND SUPPLIER may make application for final payment. The final Application for Payment shall be accompanied by all documentation called for in the Contract Documents and such other data and schedules as DESIGN PROFESSIONAL may reasonably require, together with complete and legally effective releases or waivers (satisfactory to PROJECT MANAGER) of all Liens arising out of, or filed in connection with the Work. In lieu thereof and as approved by the PROJECT MANAGER, the SAND SUPPLIER may furnish the following set of documents: 1) receipts or releases in full; 2) an affidavit of the SAND SUPPLIER providing warranties, covenants, and representations that the releases and receipts include all labor, services, material and equipment bills, and other indebtedness connected with the Work for which the PROJECT MANAGER or the PROJECT MANAGER's property might in any way be responsible; 3) proof that all charges have been paid or otherwise satisfied; and 4) consent of the Surety to final payment. If any subcontractor, manufacturer, fabricator, supplier or distributor fails to furnish a release or receipt in full, the SAND SUPPLIER may furnish a bond or other collateral satisfactory to the PROJECT MANAGER to indemnify the PROJECT MANAGER against any lien. 16.5 Recommendation for Final Payment. If, on the basis of the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's observation of the Work during construction and post-construction, and the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's review of the final Application for Payment and accompanying documentation the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL is satisfied that the Work has been completed and the SAND SUPPLIER has fulfilled all of his/her obligations under the Contract Documents, the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will, within seven (7) days after receipt of the final Application for Payment, indicate in writing his recommendation of payment and present the application to PROJECT MANAGER. If the application and accompanying documentation are acceptable as to form and substance, the PROJECT MANAGER shall, within thirty (30) days after receipt of the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL's recommendation for Final Payment, pay SAND SUPPLIER the amount recommended by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or other such amounts deemed appropriate by the PROJECT MANAGER in consultation with the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. If the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL is not satisfied that the work is completed, the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will return the application to the SAND SUPPLIER, indicating in writing the reasons for refusing to recommend final payment, in which case the SAND SUPPLIER shall make the necessary corrections and resubmit the application. TP-14 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 20 of 52 16.6 Access to the Work. The PROJECT MANAGER shall have the right to exclude the SAND SUPPLIER from the Work after the date of completion, but the PROJECT MANAGER shall allow the SAND SUPPLIER reasonable access to complete or correct items. 16.7 SAND SUPPLIER's Obligation to Complete Work. The SAND SUPPLIER's obligation to perform and complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents shall be absolute. Neither recommendation of any payment by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, nor the issuance of any statement of certificate of completion or substantial completion, nor any payment by the PROJECT MANAGER to the SAND SUPPLIER under the Contract Documents, nor any use of or occupancy of the Work of any part thereof by the PROJECT MANAGER, nor any act of acceptance by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL nor any failure to do so, nor the issuance of a notice of acceptability by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, nor any correction of defective Work by the PROJECT MANAGER shall constitute an acceptance of Work not in accordance with the Contract Documents or a release of the SAND SUPPLIER's obligation to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. It is essential that sand be placed in all reaches and the SAND SUPPLIER shall plan his operations accordingly. 16.8 Making and Acceptance of Final Payment. The making and acceptance of final payment shall constitute: 16.8.1. A waiver of all claims by the COUNTY against the SAND SUPPLIER, except claims arising from unsettled liens, from defective Work appearing after project completion, or from failure to comply with the Contract Documents or the terms of any guarantees specified therein; however, final payment shall not constitute a waiver by the COUNTY of any rights in respect to the SAND SUPPLIER's continuing obligations under the Contract Documents. 16.8.2 A waiver of all claims by the SAND SUPPLIER against the COUNTY other than those previously made in writing and still unsettled. 16.9 Thirty (30) Day Correction Period. If within thirty (30) days after the date of completion or such longer period of time as may be prescribed by law or by the terms of any applicable guarantee required by the Contract Documents or by any specific provision of the Contract Documents, any Work is found to be defective, the SAND SUPPLIER shall promptly, without cost to the COUNTY and in accordance with the COUNTY's written instructions, either correct such defective Work or, if it has been rejected by the COUNTY, remove it from the site and replace it with non-defective Work. If the SAND SUPPLIER does not promptly comply with the terms of such instructions, or in an emergency where delay would cause serious risk or loss or damage, the COUNTY may have the defective Work corrected or the rejected Work removed and replaced, and all direct and indirect costs of such removal and replacement, including TP-15 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 21 of 52 compensation for additional professional services, shall be paid by the SAND SUPPLIER. This does not apply to natural erosion. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. 17.1 Provide Beach Compatible Sand (Pit Price). All costs associated with the procurement of beach compatible sand from an upland source that meets the technical specifications shall be included in the unit cost for "Provide Sand". This includes all laboratory testing of sand describe in the QA/QC Plan for Upland Sand Sources (Appendix II-B), at the pit. 17.2 Transport Sand. All costs associated with the compliance of all sections and associated subsections of these Technical Specifications except where specifically noted shall be included in the unit cost for "Transport Sand". This shall include but not be limited to Transportation, Maintenance of Traffic and Public Safety, quality control, environmental compliance, and any roadway repairs required upon completion of the Work. 17.3 Sand Analysis. Payment will be based on each sand sample sieve along with Munsell Color analyzed as described in this document. A complete analysis will include a gradation curve and table and the full Munsell color description of the wet sand. A carbonate test will be required for mine sand samples. The price will be included in the unit cost for "Provide Sand" at the upland sand source. TP-16 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 22 of 52 PART III. QUALITY CONTROL AND OPERATIONS 18. SAND SUPPLIER QUALITY CONTROL. 18.1 The SAND SUPPLIER is responsible for quality control and shall provide and maintain an effective quality control program. 18.2 Quality Control Reports (Appendix I) shall be provided to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER by 1:00 p.m. on a daily basis from the first day of mobilization to the last day of demobilization without exception. 18.3 The SAND SUPPLIER shall establish a quality control system to perform sufficient inspections and tests of all items of Work, including that of his subcontractors, and to insure conformance to applicable provisions of the Contract Documents and Plans with respect to the materials, workmanship, construction, finish, and functional performance and prevention of damages to natural resources, structures, and infrastructure. This control will be established for all construction except where the Technical Provisions of the Contract provide for specific PROJECT MANAGER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL control by observation, tests or other means. The SAND SUPPLIER's control system will specifically include the surveillance and tests required in the Technical Provisions. 18.4 The SAND SUPPLIER's quality control system is the means by which the SAND SUPPLIER is assured that the construction complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents, including all project permits. The controls shall be adequate to cover all construction operations and shall be keyed to the proposed construction sequence. 18.5 The SAND SUPPLIER's job supervisory staff may be used for quality control, supplemented as necessary by additional personnel for surveillance, by special technicians, or by testing facilities with the expertise to provide for the controls required by the Technical Provisions. 18.6 The SAND SUPPLIER shall furnish to the PROJECT MANAGER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL at least fourteen (14) days prior to the pre-construction conference, a written Quality Control Plan that shall include the procedures, instructions, and reports to be used. Unless specifically authorized by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, no construction will be started until the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL approves the SAND SUPPLIER's Quality Control Plan. This document will include as a minimum: 18.6.1 The quality control organization. 18.6.2 The number and qualifications of personnel to be used for this purpose. TP-17 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 23 of 52 18.6.3 Authority and responsibility of quality control personnel. 18.6.4 Methods of quality control including that for his/her subcontractor's work. The methods shall include items to be inspected, types of inspections, duties of personnel, and methods the SAND SUPPLIER proposes to use to assure quality Work. 18.6.5 Method of documenting quality control operations, inspection and testing. 18.6.6 Safety inspection procedures including employees responsible for supervising accident prevention activities and insuring compliance with safety measures. 18.6.7 Medical emergency procedures, including employees responsible for supervision of medical emergencies. 18.6.8 Written instructions to the SAND SUPPLIER's representative responsible for quality control outlining his duties and responsibilities and signed by a responsible officer of the firm. 18.6.9 An Activity Hazard Analysis. 18.6.10 A copy of daily quality control report forms and other inspection documents that are to be furnished to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER. A sample "Daily Quality Control Report" is included as Appendix Ito these technical specifications. This report will be used by the SAND SUPPLIER as the Daily Quality Control Report to be provided to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER. The SAND SUPPLIER may substitute a different report format if: (1) it contains, at minimum, the same information and (2) it is approved, in writing, by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 18.7 All compliance inspections will be recorded on the Daily Quality Control Report, including, but not limited to, the specific items required in each technical section of the specifications. This form shall include records of corrective action taken and shall be furnished to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL daily by 1:00 p.m. the following day. The Daily Quality Control Report shall be filled out every day, regardless of whether Work is accomplished, starting on the first day of mobilization and ending on the last day of demobilization and furnished to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL as required by the Contract Documents. Failure to provide Daily Quality Control Reports to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL shall result in delay in payments to the SAND SUPPLIER until the Daily Quality Control Reports are received and are acceptable to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. TP-18 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 24 of 52 18.8 If reoccurring deficiencies in an item or items indicate that the quality control system is not adequate, or reports are not being provided in a timely manner, the SAND SUPPLIER shall undertake such corrective actions as directed by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 18.9 No separate payment will be made for SAND SUPPLIER quality control. 18.10 The SAND SUPPLIER shall be responsible for making such inspections, surveys and tests as may be necessary to assure compliance with all the requirements of the Contract Documents and applicable permits. Reports of all inspections, surveys and tests and remedial actions shall be submitted to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL in writing. 18.11 The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL reserves the right to utilize the SAND SUPPLIER's control testing laboratory, and other equipment to make spot tests, and to check the SAND SUPPLIER's testing procedures, techniques, and results (where applicable). 18.12 The SAND SUPPLIER's QC program shall focus particular attention on sand quality and productivity. 19. QUALITY CONTROL REPORTING. The SAND SUPPLIER will be required to prepare a daily Quality Control Report, and copies shall be furnished to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL on a daily basis, at 1 p.m. Reports will be provided from the first day of mobilization to the last day of Work including site clean up. An example copy of the Daily Quality Control report is appended to this exhibit. The SAND SUPPLIER may substitute his own quality control report format if: (1) it contains, at minimum, all of the information required by the format example in the General Conditions and (2) the SAND SUPPLIER'S quality control report format is approved by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 20. DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 20.1 Technical Issues. It is agreed by the parties hereto that the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL in consultation with the PROJECT MANAGER shall decide all technical issues of whatever nature that may arise relative to the interpretation of the technical portions of the Contract Documents, the Plans, volume measurements, and prosecution and fulfillment of this Contract, and as to the character, quality, amount and value of any Work done and materials furnished under this Contract. 20.2 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER Access to the Beach. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER shall have unlimited access to the upland sand source (including all offsite staging and stockpile areas). The PROJECT MANAGER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or his TP-19 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 25 of 52 representative is to have free access to the materials and the Work at all times for measuring and observing, and the SAND SUPPLIER is to afford him all assistance for doing so. The presence or absence of the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL shall not relieve the SAND SUPPLIER of responsibility for the proper execution of the Work in accordance with the specifications. The SAND SUPPLIER shall provide an onsite work area for the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, PROJECT MANAGER or his representative at the upland sand source or the unloading area. 21. FINAL CLEAN UP. Final clean-up shall include the removal of the SAND SUPPLIER's plant and all equipment or materials either for disposal or reuse from the project site. Plant and/or equipment or materials to be disposed of shall only be disposed of in a manner and at locations approved by the PROJECT MANAGER. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the PROJECT MANAGER, the SAND SUPPLIER is not permitted to abandon equipment or materials at the beach fill area or other areas adjacent to the Work site. 22. NIGHTTIME OPERATIONS. Nighttime is defined as the period of time from 7 p.m to 7 a.m. Truck haul operation can only occur from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No nighttime or Sunday construction activities are permitted. The SAND SUPPLIER shall minimize noise, so as not to disturb residents living along the haul route adjacent to the project area. The SAND SUPPLIER shall design his schedule to avoid night time work. Truck deliveries to or near the beach may be allowed at night, but will have to be addressed at the pre-construction meeting to define the extent of these operations, in deference to the residential nature of the area. 23. CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. A minimum of one (1) complete set of construction Plans and Contract Documents (with permits) shall be kept in the construction site field office. The PROJECT MANAGER will provide the SAND SUPPLIER with a reproduceable set of documents. TP-20 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 26 of 52 PART IV. MATERIALS 24. CHARACTER OF MATERIAL. The quality of the material proposed for the project will be considered in selecting the SAND SUPPLIER for this project. The material must come from the Immokalee, Witherspoon or Lake Wales Mines, or other mine previously approved by FDEP. The quality standard and required submittals are described in this section and Appendix II. The sand quality shall not vary from the sample presented at bidding or contract negotiations. 24.1 Acceptable Characteristic of Material Within Upland Sand Source. Based upon limited information provided by stockpile samples from the upland sand source, the material provided by the mine (Appendix II) will be within the limits described below. The material descriptions are provided in the appendices of this section and only describe the materials obtained from those investigations. The SAND SUPPLIER shall be solely responsible for any interpretation or conclusions drawn therefrom. The upland sand sources shall have a composite mean grain size of between 0.32 mm and 0.36 mm, a sorting value of less than 1.00 , and a silt content of less than 1.0%. Three sand sources [Immokalee (Stewart), Witherspoon (Vulcan), and Lake Wales (Cemex)] have indicated they can produce material of this quality. Another source must be approved by FDEP and the County prior to submittal of the bid. Approval process will be the sole responsibility of the SAND SUPPLIER. 24.2 Potential Differing Upland Sand Source Characteristics. The characteristics of the materials in the upland sand source may be generally indicated by the granularmetric curves and reports from stockpile samples attached hereto as Appendix II. The material found in each of the samples is indicative only of the material at that discrete time and location within the stockpile. The SAND SUPPLIER should be aware that it is possible for material of differing characteristics to be present in the stockpile, including material differing from that contained in the samples. 24.3 The State has developed a QA/QC Plan for the upland sand sources (Appendix II- B) that apply to this project. This plan must be applied to maintain the quality of the upland sand. 24.4 Quality Characteristics of Fill Material. All fill material must meet the quality requirements of these plans and specifications and Appendix II-B Sediment Quality Control/Quality Assurance for Upland Sand Sources. The fill material must also satisfy the following criteria: 1.The average Mean Grain Size shall be between 0.32 mm and 0.36 mm. 2.The desired average silt content (passing #230/0.0625 mm sieve) shall be no more than 1.0%. 3. Currently, acceptable mines are Immokalee, Witherspoon and Lakes Wales which are owned by Stewart, Vulcan and Cemex, respectively. (Appendix II). TP-21 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 27 of 52 4. The fill material must be free of debris, sharp rocks, pebbles, concrete rubble, peat, clay and be very well drained or dry on delivery. 5. The Munsell color value of the dry sand shall have an average value of 7 or above, with 8 desirable. 24.5 Submittals. Bidders shall submit the following samples and documents with their bids: ]. One U.S. pint (at least 200 grams) sample of the sand being proposed for the project. 2. Gradation analysis report containing the Mean Grain Size, and Phi sorting (Standard Deviation) of the submitted sample. 3. Other characteristics of the material, as listed in this Section and Appendix II-B. These include the percentage of silt, carbonate and the exclusion of clay, peat, debris, and larger stones. 4. A recent certified quality control and laboratory report on the product or pit proposed for this project. 5. The dry Munsell characteristics (color value, chroma, hue) of the sand. The submission of an unacceptable sand sample can be grounds for bid disqualification. The submitted sample must be consistent with the laboratory results submitted by the SAND SUPPLIER. The submitted sand sample and documents shall be considered the SAND SUPPLIER's certification of the material to be provided. The COUNTY may conduct its own laboratory analysis of the submitted sample. Table 3 Summary of Acceptable Upland Sand Quality Company Product Avg.Grain Sorting Percent Munsell Size(mm) Fines Color Value Immokalee Mine, Witherspoon, Beach Sand 0.32-0.36 <1.00 <1.00 8/1 and Lake Wales 24.6 Sand QualityControl. During loading and prior to transport of sand from an upland sand source, the SAND SUPPLIER shall sample and perform quality control gradation testing to assure that the sand being delivered meets the mean grain size standards. The results shall be provided to the COUNTY each work day. Gradation testing at the source will be as described in the Sediment QA/QC Plan which is analysis of four samples per 3,000 cubic yards in the stockpile. These will be performed by the SAND SUPPLIER along with an analysis of moisture content in the stockpile. TP-22 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 28 of 52 The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER shall select up to 20 random samples from the beach or truck samples for analysis by the SAND SUPPLIER. The County observer, with the assistance of the SAND SUPPLIER, will take and visually assess a sand sample from each truck delivery at the unloading site. Any and all materials that do not meet the size and color requirements shall be rejected under the SAND SUPPLIER's quality control program. The SAND SUPPLIER will not receive payment for any material which is brought to the site but rejected due to inconsistency with the requirements of the quality standards. Additionally, the SAND SUPPLIER will be required to dispose of the deficient material at the expense of the SAND SUPPLIER. The preferred test for calculating the mean grain size of each sand sample shall be by use of the moment method. Gradation analysis using DOT procedures and sieve sizes is acceptable, but the two point graphical method is unacceptable for calculating mean grain size and sorting. The mean grain size using the 3-point method (Folk and Ward (1957)) is as follows: Dmean =016 + 050++084 3 24.7 Grain Size Testing and Reporting. The SAND SUPPLIER shall report the Mean Grain Size, the Phi Standard Deviation (sorting value), Silt Content, moisture content, Munsell Color Value, and carbonate content of the proposed sand source(s) to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL prior to transporting sand to the project site and for each quality control test during construction. Laboratory sieving of sand shall provide the data for calculation of the Mean Grain Size, Phi Standard Deviation and silt content. Carbonate testing is required with the initial sample from the sand source, with the sample accompanying the bid form, and all beach samples. The SAND SUPPLIER will conduct all tests and measurements in a laboratory proposed by the SAND SUPPLIER in his proposal and approved by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. Procedures for this situation will be included in the SAND SUPPLIER's Quality Control Plan for review and approval. Laboratory results are due within a week of collection. The Average Mean Grain Size refers to the average of the Mean Grain Sizes calculated for all individual samples required for analysis. The grain size distribution information should be based upon ASTM-D422, using standard sieves of square mesh woven wire cloth separated at 0.50 intervals (-4.00 to 4.00, and also the No. 200 sieve and #230 sieve). A tabulation of the laboratory results of the cumulative percent retained on each sieve by weight shall be provided with each gradation curve. Samples shall be numbered consecutively. Alternate methods of sieve analysis using standard DOT sieves and methods can be proposed and used with approval of the COUNTY, but are less desirable. 27.8 Moisture Content. Moisture content should be 6% or less or the load may be rejected by the Inspector. TP-23 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 29 of 52 Moisture Content will be recorded on the truck weight tickets, and updated every 3,000 cubic yards. All analysis performed at the pit shall be the responsibility of the SAND SUPPLIER. 24.9 Munsell Color. Munsell Color can be determined by using one of the published Munsell Color Soil Charts. Geotechnical laboratories normally have this reference, which contains color pallets for determining sand color by comparison. 24.10 Consistency of Material. If the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL believes that the fill material does not comply with the above standards or the quality proposed by the SAND SUPPLIER, the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL may request the SAND SUPPLIER to analyze the grain size distribution (mean and sorting) of a random sample collected by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. If any of the samples fails to meet the approved criteria, the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will select a second sample from within 50 feet. If the second sample fails: I. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL may direct the SAND SUPPLIER to remove and replace the unsatisfactory material at the SAND SUPPLIER'S expense. 2. The SAND SUPPLIER shall, at a minimum, supply material from an alternative location at the sand source, with certification from the SAND SUPPLIER that the material is in compliance with the quality criteria. If the certification or quality on the new material is inadequate as judged by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, then the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL may require the SAND SUPPLIER to change to another permitted sand supplier in order to provide material consistent with the project quality criteria. Such changes will involve no additional costs to the PROJECT MANAGER. TP-24 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 30 of 52 PART V. EXECUTION 25.1 Condition of Trucks & Inspections. All dump trucks and associated transport equipment shall be kept in good condition and licensed for travel on roadways. Equipment may be rejected by the PROJECT MANAGER or his representative based on safety issues. The SAND SUPPLIER shall ensure that all dump trucks being used to transport sand to the Naples Beaches are FDOT inspected by Florida Highway Patrol and or jointly inspected by Collier/Lee County Sheriff's Office prior to hauling. Any new trucks that are added to the delivery rotation after the initial inspection, must also be inspected prior to hauling for the SAND SUPPLIER. If a truck has not been inspected it will not be loaded at the mine. Dump trucks are also subject to inspection at any time by FDOT/FHP/Collier& Lee County Sheriff/Naples Police along the haul route. TP-25 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 31 of 52 PART VII. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 25. SCOPE. The Environmental Protection section of the Contract Documents addresses SAND SUPPLIER responsibilities for the prevention of pollution and other environmental damage as the result of construction operations under the Contract Documents, including those measures set forth in the Technical Provisions. For the purpose of this specification, pollution and other environmental damage are defined as the presence of chemical, physical, or biological elements or agents which adversely affect human health or welfare; unfavorably alter ecological balances of importance to human life; affect other species of importance to man; or degrade the utility of the environment for aesthetic, cultural, and/or historical purposes. The control of pollution and damage requires consideration of air, water, land and the marine environment and includes management of construction activities, visual aesthetics, noise, solid waste, radiant energy, and radioactive materials, as well as other pollutants. The SAND SUPPLIER shall fulfill these specifications at the SAND SUPPLIER's expense. All costs associated with these sections shall be included in the unit costs for providing & transport of sand. 26. QUALITY CONTROL. The SAND SUPPLIER shall establish and maintain quality control for environmental protection for all items set forth herein. The SAND SUPPLIER shall record on Daily Quality Control reports any problems in complying with laws, regulations and ordinances, as well as project permits, and corrective action taken. 27. PERMITS AND BIOLOGICAL OPINIONS. The SAND SUPPLIER shall comply with all requirements under the terms and conditions set out in all permits applicable to the Work. Project permit copies are provided in the contract documents. Specifically, the SAND SUPPLIER will familiarize himself/herself with general and specific conditions contained in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection permit (Permit No. 0222355-001-JC), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit (Permit No. SAJ-2003- 12405 (IP-MN)), and other State and Federal approvals for the project, including Biological Opinions. Any other licenses or approvals required, including, but not limited to those that may be required by the COUNTY or City of Naples, shall be secured and paid for by the SAND SUPPLIER. A copy of each permit is a part of the Contract Documents. 28. SUBCONTRACTORS. Assurance of compliance with all sections of the contract by subcontractors shall be the responsibility of the SAND SUPPLIER, including compliance with all environmental permit requirements. TP-26 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 32 of 52 29. NOTIFICATION. The DESIGN PROFESSIONAL will notify the SAND SUPPLIER and the PROJECT MANAGER of any known noncompliance with the aforementioned Federal, State, or local laws or regulations, permits and other elements of the SAND SUPPLIER's environmental protection plan. Nevertheless, it remains the sole responsibility of the SAND SUPPLIER to comply with all applicable Federal, State or Local laws or regulations, permits and all elements of the environmental protection plan. If there is known non-compliance, the PROJECT MANAGER will determine what action will be taken and such response will be transmitted to the SAND SUPPLIER by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, which may include stopping construction of the project until the SAND SUPPLIER complies with the environmental protection plan. It will also be the SAND SUPPLIER's responsibility that all subcontractors shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, permit requirements and all elements of the environmental protection plan. 30. PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES. The environmental resources within the project boundaries and those affected outside the limits of permanent work under this contract shall be protected during the entire period of this contract. The SAND SUPPLIER shall confine his/her activities to areas defined by the plans and specifications. Environmental protection shall be as stated in the following subparagraphs. 30.1 Work Area Limits. Isolated areas (if any) within the work area, which are to be saved and protected, shall also be identified by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or PROJECT MANAGER and marked or fenced by the SAND SUPPLIER. 30.2 Protection of Landscape. Trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, land forms, and other landscape features within the work area to be preserved shall be identified by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or PROJECT MANAGER, and clearly delineated by the SAND SUPPLIER, by marking, fencing, or wrapping with boards, or any other techniques approved by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. Unless otherwise approved by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or PROJECT MANAGER, no trees, shrubs, vines, grasses or other vegetation will be harmed or destroyed by the SAND SUPPLIER for any purpose. The SAND SUPPLIER shall relocate any protected flora that may be affected by construction activities. 30.3 Disposal of Solid Wastes. Solid wastes (including clearing debris) shall be placed in containers, which are removed from the mine area and emptied on a regular schedule. The SAND SUPPLIER will empty containers when three-quarters full and will avoid overflow conditions. All handling and disposal shall be conducted to prevent contamination. No steel, cables, wire, pipe, drums OR ANY OTHER DEBRIS shall be permitted to be disposed overboard into any water body. Disposal of solid wastes or debris into a waterbody is a violation of State and Federal laws. If such debris is found, the debris shall be removed by the SAND SUPPLIER at his own cost, or the cost of removal deducted from the SAND SUPPLIER's final payment. TP-27 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 33 of 52 30.4 Disposal of Chemical Waste. Chemical waste shall be stored in corrosion resistant containers, removed from the work area and disposed of in accordance with Federal, State, and Local regulations. The SAND SUPPLIER shall perform all maintenance of equipment, including but not limited to refueling, filter changes, and replacement of hydraulic lines in a manner so as not to contaminate soils, ground or surface waters, or any other natural resources. 30.5 Disposal of Discarded Materials. Discarded materials other than those, which can be included in the solid waste category, will be handled by the SAND SUPPLIER as directed by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or PROJECT MANAGER. 30.6 Protection of Air Resources. The SAND SUPPLIER shall keep construction activities under surveillance, management, and control to minimize pollution of air resources. All activities, equipment, processes, and work operated or performed by the SAND SUPPLIER in accomplishing the specified construction shall be in strict accordance with the applicable air pollution standards of the State of Florida (Florida Statute, Chapter 403 and others) and all Federal emission and performance laws and standards. 30.7 Protection of Sound Intrusions. The SAND SUPPLIER shall keep hauling activities under surveillance, and control to minimize damage to the environment by noise. 30.8 Sanitary Facility. The SAND SUPPLIER shall supply and maintain, at minimum, one (1) sanitary facility for the use of employees and subcontractors at the mine site. The facility shall be conveniently located in the vicinity of the mine operation. The facility shall be maintained in good condition and working order. 31. POST CONSTRUCTION CLEAN-UP. The SAND SUPPLIER shall clean-up any area used for construction as stated in General Condition Section on Final Clean-Up. 32. PERMIT TIME EXTENSIONS. Permits for the project require construction activities to be completed before the peak of sea turtle nesting season, to include time for demobilization and tilling of the beach. In addition, there are local restrictions incorporated into the schedule. If construction is not completed within the time frame allotted, the PROJECT MANAGER has no plans to grant or seek an extension of the construction deadline, since it is not the PROJECT MANAGER's policy to work on the beach during the peak of sea turtle nesting season. If the SAND SUPPLIER cannot provide and transport sand in the time specified, then the PROJECT MANAGER will take one of the following actions: TP-28 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 34 of 52 32.1 Require the SAND SUPPLIER to remobilize, at the SAND SUPPLIER's own expense, to complete the project as permit conditions and time frames allow if it is determined by the PROJECT MANAGER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL that the SAND SUPPLIER failed to complete the project by the end of the construction period as identified in the Contract or the permits, due to the negligence of the SAND SUPPLIER in avoiding delay or lack of competence or capability of the SAND SUPPLIER is competing the project in a timely manner. The SAND SUPPLIER will be charged liquidated damages for all delays after the completion date, even if they are caused by permit condition and local policy to avoid sea turtle nesting season. 32.2 Terminate the Contract and compensate the SAND SUPPLIER for sand supplied and transported to the unloading sites in accordance with Contract Documents, if the delay is determined not to be the SAND SUPPLIER's fault. 32.3 Negotiate with the SAND SUPPLIER to seek an acceptable agreement allowing for project completion when (if) permits and regulatory agencies allow for the resumption of project construction activities. 33. NOISE CONTROL. 33.1 Hauling Equipment. All hauling equipment used on this Work shall be equipped with satisfactory mufflers or other noise abatement devices. The SAND SUPPLIER shall conduct his operations so as to comply with all Federal, State, and local laws pertaining to noise. The use of horns, whistles, and signals shall be held to the minimum necessary in order to ensure as quiet an operation as possible while maintaining safety on the job site. 34. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN. Fourteen (14) days prior to the pre-construction meeting, the SAND SUPPLIER shall submit in writing an Environmental Protection Plan to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. Approval of the SAND SUPPLIER'S plan will not relieve the SAND SUPPLIER of his responsibility for adequate and continuing control of pollutants and other environmental protection measures. The Environmental Protection Plan shall include but not be limited to the following: 34.1 Procedures to be implemented to provide the required environmental protection and to comply with the applicable permits, laws and regulations. The SAND SUPPLIER shall provide written assurance that immediate corrective action will be taken to correct pollution of the environment due to accident, natural causes or failure to follow the procedures set out in accordance with the Environmental Protection Plan. 34.2 A list of Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and permits concerning environmental protection, pollution control, and abatement that are applicable to the SAND SUPPLIER'S proposed operations and the requirements imposed by those laws, regulations, and permits. TP-29 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 35 of 52 34.3 Environmental monitoring plans for the jobsite, including land, water, air and noise monitoring. 34.4 Oil spill prevention. 34.5 Oil spill contingency plan. 34.6 A statement as to the person who will be responsible for implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan. The SAND SUPPLIER personnel responsible shall report directly to the SAND SUPPLIER'S top management and shall have the authority to act for the SAND SUPPLIER in all environmental protection matters. 34.7 A statement acknowledging that the SAND SUPPLIER is responsible for environmental protection, including all of the SAND SUPPLIER's personnel and subcontractors. 34.8 The Environmental Protection Plan will be dated and endorsed by the individual of top management in charge of the construction. TP-30 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 36 of 52 PART VIII. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. 35. SAFETY GUIDELINES. The following plans will be submitted to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and PROJECT MANAGER for information purposes only. Submission of the plans does not constitute an endorsement on the part of the PROJECT MANAGER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL that the SAND SUPPLIER's procedures are safe or meet applicable standards. Safety is the SAND SUPPLIER's sole responsibility. A joint safety meeting will be held prior to start of the project with Collier County, Lee County, Sand Supplier and Trucking Company. 36.1 SAND SUPPLIER's Responsibility for Safety. The SAND SUPPLIER shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. The SAND SUPPLIER shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to prevent damage, injury or loss to: PROJECT MANAGER'S personnel, the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL and his representatives, State and Federal personnel, the public, all employees and subcontractors involved in the Work and all other persons who may be affected thereby; All the Work and all materials or equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on or off the site; and, Other property at the site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, natural vegetation, walks, pavements, roadways, structures and utilities not designated for removal, relocation or replacement in the course of construction. 36.2 Compliance with Safety Laws. The SAND SUPPLIER shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders of any public body having jurisdiction over the safety of persons or property or to protect them from damage, injury or loss; and shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection, and have at the work site at all times a dedicated safety and flag person. The SAND SUPPLIER shall notify owners of adjacent property and utilities when prosecution of the Work may affect them. All damage, injury or loss to any property caused, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by the SAND SUPPLIER, any subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, shall be remedied by the SAND SUPPLIER. The SAND SUPPLIER's duties and responsibilities for the safety and protection of the Work shall continue until such time as all the Work is completed and the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL has issued a notice to the PROJECT MANAGER and SAND SUPPLIER in accordance with Section "Final Acceptance and Payment" of the General Conditions that the Work is acceptable. TP-31 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 37 of 52 36.3 Familiarity with Safety Standards. The SAND SUPPLIER shall review the accident prevention clause of the Contract, the Corps of Engineers Manual, General Safety Requirements, EM 385-1-1, dated November 2003 (or most recent version), and all changes and amendments thereto, and the latest Occupational Safety and Hazard Agency (OSHA) standards, to assure himself that he has full knowledge of the personal protective equipment that must be provided workmen and that he is familiar with the safety standards applicable to the prevention of accidents during the construction of this project and shall comply with all applicable provisions. 36.4 Accident Prevention Plan. The SAND SUPPLIER is required to submit to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL an accident prevention plan fourteen (14) days prior to the pre-construction conference. The accident prevention plan must be in accordance with all USACE safety standards as specified in EM 385-1-1, dated November 2003, entitled "Safety & Health Requirements Manual." Submission of the plan does not constitute an endorsement on the part of the PROJECT MANAGER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL of the SAND SUPPLIER's accident prevention plan. The plan is intended to provide a method by which the SAND SUPPLIER demonstrates an awareness of Federal safety standards. 36.5 Hazard Communication. The SAND SUPPLIER shall comply with the requirements of OSHA 1910.1200, the Hazard Communication Standard. General requirements are as follows: 36.5.1 Provide a written program describing implementation method of the previously referenced standard. This shall be provided to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL within fourteen (14) days prior to the pre-construction conference. 36.5.2 Ensure that the SAND SUPPLIER's personnel are informed about health and physical hazards associated with materials to be used. 36.5.3 Ensure that a hazardous material inventory is available to the PROJECT MANAGER upon request. 36.5.4 Ensure proper labeling of hazardous material containers. 36.5.5 Ensure Availability of a Material Safety Data Sheet on site. 36.6 Oil and Hazardous Material Spills and Containment. The SAND SUPPLIER shall ensure that all hazardous material spills are immediately reported to the proper authorities and to the PROJECT MANAGER. All hazardous material spills shall be immediately cleaned up in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Safety and Health Requirements Manual, EM 385-1-1. In accordance with EM 381-1-1, the SAND SUPPLIER shall use suitable methods such as dikes TP-32 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 38 of 52 or curbs to prevent the spread of hazardous materials from above ground storage tanks and piping in case of leakage. TP-33 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 39 of 52 36.7 Confined Space Entry. 36.7.1 The SAND SUPPLIER shall submit a confined space entry plan as part of his written proposal for accident prevention. This plan shall satisfy the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.146, or its most recent version. 36.7.2 Confined space is any space having limited openings for entry and exit, not intended for continuous occupancy, and unfavorable natural ventilation which could contain or have produce dangerous concentrations of airborne contaminants or asphyxiates. Confined spaces may include but are not limited to storage tanks, holds of vessels, manholes, process vessels, bins, boilers, ventilation or exhaust ducts, sewers, underground utility vaults, tunnels, pipelines, trenches, vats, and open top spaces more than 4 feet in depth such as pits, tubs, vaults and vessels, or any place with limited ventilation. 36.7.3 Prior to entering a confined space, the Work environment shall be tested by a competent person using properly calibrated approved equipment to determine the extent of potential hazards. If the atmosphere cannot be determined by testing, an immediately Dangerous to Life and Health situation shall be assumed (See 29 CFR 1910.146). The evaluation shall consider the potential for evolution of toxic substances as well as oxygen content. Testing for toxic substances shall be performed prior to each entry and on a continuous or frequent (as stipulated in the Confined Space Entry Procedure) basis while personnel are working in confined spaces. 36.8 Activity Hazard Analysis. The SAND SUPPLIER is required to submit to the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL as part of his written plan for quality control an Activity Hazard Analysis. The Activity Hazard Analysis is outlined in EM 385- 1-1, Section 01.A., Figure 1-1. 36.9 Safety Person Requirement. The SAND SUPPLIER shall employ at the project site a permanent Safety and Occupational Health person (Safety Officer) to manage the SAND SUPPLIER's accident prevention program. The Safety Officer shall be on duty during any work of a complex nature including, but not limited to, the relocation of utilities; work on or around structures; work on or around existing disposal area dikes; spoil placement on the beach; or when blasting or other potentially hazardous activities are occurring. The principal Safety Officer shall report to and work directly for the SAND SUPPLIER's superintendent or the corporate safety office. The Safety Officer shall have the authority to take immediate steps to correct unsafe or unhealthful conditions. The presence of the Safety Officer will not abrogate safety responsibilities of other personnel. TP-34 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 40 of 52 Qualifications for Safety Officer: Shall have a degree in a technical or scientific field or safety in a four-year, or longer, program from an accredited school; or Shall have at least 1 year of experience in safety and occupational health work. Fourteen (14) days prior to the pre-construction conference, the SAND SUPPLIER shall submit to the PROJECT MANAGER, for approval, the name and qualifications of the proposed Safety Officer(s) and a functional description of duties. 36.10 Hurricane and Severe Storm Plan. The SAND SUPPLIER shall submit a Hurricane and Severe Storm Plan within fourteen (14) days prior to the pre- construction conference. This plan shall include but not be limited to the following: Time intervals before storms strike the project area when action will be taken and details of the actions to be taken. The plan should be specific as to what weather conditions will require Work shutdown, removal of equipment, etc. List of the equipment to be used on the job and its ability to handle adverse weather conditions. Methods of securing equipment not moved. Plan of evacuation to include interim measures; i.e., immediate reaction plans to be taken for all storm occurrences, particularly sudden/flash storms. The SAND SUPPLIER shall continually monitor the weather broadcasts, and avail themselves of such other local commercial weather forecasting services as may be available. Submission of a Hurricane and Severe Storm Plan does not constitute an endorsement on the part of the PROJECT MANAGER or DESIGN PROFESSIONAL as to the adequacy of the plan. TP-35 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 41 of 52 APPENDIX I TRUCK HAUL QUALITY CONTROL FORM CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 42 of 52 TRUCK HAUL DAILY SAND SUPPLIER QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Date: Contract Day (Report is due by 1:00 p.m. of the following day) PROJECT: Naples Beach Nourishment Project Provide and Transport Sand WEATHER: (Clear) (P. Cloudy) (Cloudy) (Rain) TEMP. Min. Max. Wind Speed mph Direction SAND SUPPLIER/SUB-CONTRACTOR and area of responsibility: 1. Work Performed Today: (Indicate hours of operation for both processing fill material and loading and transporting fill material to project site) Upland Mine: (Indicate location, description of mining and fill material processing performed as well as the quantity of processed fill material produced) Fill Transport: (Indicate number of trucks load, total tonnage loaded in trucks, and name of unloading areas used at project site to offload material including tonnage delivered to each unloading site) 4. Verbal Instructions Received: (List any instructions given by the DESIGN PROFESSIONAL or PROJECT MANAGER, deficiencies, retesting required, etc., with action to be taken.) 5. Remarks: (Cover delays and any conflicts in Plans, specifications or instructions.) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 43 of 52 9. Progress Summary: This Day To-Date Worked Hours Downtime Hours (Explain Below) Lowdermilk Park Number of Truck 3rd Ave North Deliveries 18th Ave South Total Tonnage Lowdermilk Park 3rd Ave North Delivered 18th Ave South Explanation of Downtime: SAND SUPPLIER's Verification: The above report is complete and correct, equipment used, and works performed during this reporting period are in compliance with the contract drawings and specifications except as noted above. SAND SUPPLIER's Approved Authorized Representative CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 44 of 52 APPENDIX II GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 45 of 52 APPENDIX II-A INFORMATION ON UPLAND SAND SOURCES CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 46 of 52 APPENDIX II-B QA/QC PLAN FOR UPLAND SAND SOURCE CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 47 of 52 APPENDIX III FILL QUANTITIES CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 48 of 52 APPENDIX IV APPROVED TRUCK ROUTES CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 49 of 52 APPENDIX V PERMITS CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 50 of 52 APPENDIX V-A ORIGINAL FDEP PERMIT (2005) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 51 of 52 APPENDIX V-B ORIGINAL USACE PERMIT (2005) CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 52 of 52 APPENDIX V-C STATE PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION CAC September 11,2014 EXHIBIT K: PERMITS VII-7 Staff Reports 4' 1 of 29 Department of 1+ R Environmental Protection ik Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building Jeb Bush 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Colleen M.Castille Governor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Secretary CONSOLIDATED JOINT COASTAL PERMIT AND SOVEREIGN SUBMERGED LANDS AUTHORIZATION PERMITTEE/AUTHORIZED ENTITY: Permit/Authorization No.: 0222355-001-JC Collier County Board of County Commissioners Date of Issue: January 12, 2005 do Ron Hovel! Expiration Date of Construction Phase: Collier County Public Utilities Division January 12,2015 3301 East Tamiami Trail,Bldg.H County: Collier Naples,FL 34112 Project: Collier County Beach Nourishment Project This permit is issued under the authority of Chapter 161 and Part IV of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes(F.S.), and Title 62,Florida Administrative Code(F.A.C.). Pursuant to Operating Agreements executed between the Department of Environmental Protection (Department)and the water management districts, as referenced in Chapter 62-113,F.A.C.,the Department is responsible for reviewing and taking final agency action on this activity. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: The project entails the construction of a two-phase beach nourishment project along three segments of the Collier County shoreline. Phase I includes nourishment of previously restored areas of Vanderbilt Beach(R-21 to R-31),Park Shore Beach(R-48 to R-55),and Naples Beach (R-58 to R-79). Phase II will include beach restoration along the shores of Pelican Bay(R-31 to R-37)and Northern Park Shore(R-43.5 to R-48). The total volume of material for beach placement is approximately 673,000 cubic yards of beach quality sand from an offshore source over approximately 50,000 feet of shoreline. The project also includes construction of 1.09 acres of artificial reef in order to mitigate for anticipated hardbottom impacts resulting from equilibration of project toe of fill. ACTIVITY LOCATION: The borrow area is located approximately thirty-three(33)miles to the north and offshore of the placement area,outside of State waters. The beach fill areas are located along the shorelines of Vanderbilt Beach,Park Shore Beach,Naples Beach,Pelican Bay, and Northern Park Shore, in Collier County, Sections 29 and 32,Township 48 South,Range 25 East, Sections 5, 8, 16,21 and 28, Township 49 South,Range 25 East and Sections 4 and 9,Township 50 "More Protection, Less Process' Printed on recycled paper. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 2 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 2 of 21 South,Range 25 East, Gulf of Mexico, Class III Waters. The location of the mitigation artificial reef will be determined at a later date. This permit constitutes a finding of consistency with Florida's Coastal Zone Management Program, as required by Section 307 of the Coastal Zone Management Act. This permit also constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. This activity also requires a proprietary authorization,as the activity is located on sovereign submerged lands owned by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund,pursuant to Article X, Section 11 of the Florida Constitution,and Sections 253.002 and 253.77,F.S. The activity is not exempt from the need to obtain a proprietary authorization. The Department has the responsibility to review and take final action on this request for proprietary authorization in accordance with Section 18-21.0051,F.A.C.,and the Operating Agreements executed between the Department and the water management districts,as referenced in Chapter 62-113,F.A.C. In addition to the above,this proprietary authorization has been reviewed in accordance with Chapter 253,F.S., Chapter 18-21, Section 62-343.075,F.A.C.,and the policies of the Board of Trustees. As staff to the Board of Trustees,the Department has reviewed the activity described above, and has determined that the beach placement activities and placement of the mitigative artificial reef qualify for a Letter of Consent to use sovereign, submerged lands,as long as the work performed is located within the boundaries as described herein and is consistent with the terms and conditions herein. Therefore,consent is hereby granted,pursuant to Chapter 253.77, F.S.,to perform the activity on the specified sovereign submerged lands. A copy of this authorization has been sent to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE)for review. The USACOE may require a separate permit. Failure to obtain this authorization prior to construction could subject you to enforcement action by that agency. You are hereby advised that authorizations also may be required by other federal, state, and local entities. This authorization does not relieve you from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. The above named permittee is hereby authorized to construct the work shown on the application and approved drawings,plans, and other documents attached hereto or on file with the Department and made a part hereof. This permit and authorization to use sovereign submerged lands is subject to the limits,conditions, and locations of work shown in the attached drawings, and is also subject to the General Conditions and Specific Conditions, which are a binding part of this permit and authorization. You are advised to read and understand these drawings and conditions prior to commencing the authorized activities, and to ensure the work is conducted in conformance with all the terms,conditions, and drawings. If you CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 3 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 3 of 21 are utilizing a contractor,the contractor also should read and understand these drawings and conditions prior to commencing the authorized activities. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. All activities authorized by this permit shall be implemented as set forth in the plans and specification approved as a part of this permit,and all conditions and requirements of this permit. The permittee shall notify the Department in writing of any anticipated deviation from the permit prior to implementation so that the Department can determine whether a modification of the permit is required pursuant to Section 62B-49.008,Florida Administrative Code. 2. If, for any reason,the permittee does not comply with any condition or limitation specified in this permit,the permittee shall immediately provide the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems and the appropriate District office of the Department with a written report containing the following information: a description of and cause of noncompliance; and the period of noncompliance,including dates and times; or, if not corrected,the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue,and steps being taken to reduce,eliminate,and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. 3. This permit does not eliminate the necessity to obtain any other applicable licenses or permits which may be required by federal, state,local, special district laws and regulations. This permit is not a waiver or approval of any other Department permit or authorization that may be required for other aspects of the total project which are not addressed in this permit. 4. This permit conveys no title to land or water,does not constitute State recognition or acknowledgment of title, and does not constitute authority for the use of sovereignty land of Florida seaward of the mean high-water line,or,if established,the erosion control line,unless herein provided and the necessary title, lease, easement,or other form of consent authorizing the proposed use has been obtained from the State. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary authorizations from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund prior to commencing activity on sovereign lands or other state-owned lands. 5. Any delineation of the extent of a wetland or other surface water submitted as part of the permit application,including plans or other supporting documentation, shall not be considered specifically approved unless a specific condition of this permit or a formal determination under Section 373.421(2),F.S.,provides otherwise. 6. This permit does not convey to the permittee or create in the permittee any property right, or any interest in real property,nor does it authorize any entrance upon or activities on property which is not owned or controlled by the permittee. The issuance of this permit does not convey any vested rights or any exclusive privileges. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 4 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 4 of 21 7. This permit or a copy thereof,complete with all conditions,attachments,plans and specifications,modifications,and time extensions shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity. The permittee shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this permit. 8. The permittee,by accepting this permit, specifically agrees to allow authorized Department personnel with proper identification and at reasonable times, access to the premises where the permitted activity is located or conducted for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the terms of the permit and with the rules of the Department and to have access to and copy any records that must be kept under conditions of the permit;to inspect the facility,equipment, practices,or operations regulated or required under this permit; and to sample or monitor any substances or parameters at any location reasonably necessary to assure compliance with this permit or Department rules. Reasonable time may depend on the nature of the concern being investigated. 9. At least forty-eight(48)hours prior to commencement of activity authorized by this permit,the permittee shall submit to the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems and the appropriate District office of the Department a written notice of commencement of construction indicating the actual start date and the expected completion date and an affirmative statement that the permittee and the contractor, if one is to be used,have read the general an specific conditions of the permit and understand them. 10. If historical or archaeological artifacts are discovered at any time on the project site,the permittee shall immediately notify the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems. 11. Within 30 days after completion of construction or completion of a subsequent maintenance event authorized by this permit,the permittee shall submit to the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems and the appropriate District office of the Department a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer. This certification shall state that all locations and elevations specified by the permit have been verified;the activities authorized by the permit have been performed in compliance with the plans and specifications approved as a part of the permit,and all conditions of the permit;or shall describe any deviations from the plans and specification, and all conditions of the permit. When the completed activity differs substantially from the permitted plans, any substantial deviations shall be noted and explained on two copies of as-built drawings submitted to the Department. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 5 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 5 of 21 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Pursuant to Chapter 161.141,Florida Statutes,prior to construction of the beach nourishment project,the board of trustees must establish the line of mean high water for any area affected by this project that does not already have an Erosion Control Line(ECL). This is required to establish the boundary line between sovereignty lands of the state bordering on the Gulf of Mexico and the upland properties. No work shall commence until the Erosion Control Line has been executed to the satisfaction of the Department and recorded in the County Records. 2. If historical or archaeological artifacts such as,but not limited to,Indian canoes,arrow heads,pottery or physical remains, are discovered at any time within the project site,the permittee shall immediately stop all activities which disturb the soil and notify the Department's District Office and the Bureau of Historic Preservation,Division of Historical Resources,R. A. Gray Building, 500 South Bronough Street,Tallahassee,Florida 32399-0250. 3. All reports or notices relating to this permit shall be sent to the DEP,Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems,JCP Compliance Officer, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard,Mail Station 300,Tallahassee,Florida 32399-3000 and the DEP South District Office,(2295 Victoria Ave, Suite#364,Ft. Myers, Florida 33901-3881). 4. No work shall be conducted under this permit until the permittee has received a written notice to proceed from the Department. At least 60 days prior to the requested date of issuance of the notice to proceed,the permittee shall submit the following for review and approval by the Department: a. A detailed Physical Monitoring Plan,as described in Specific Condition No. 11 (Physical Monitoring section). b. Final Biological Monitoring Plan, as described in Specific Condition No. 10. c. A Mitigation Plan as described in Specific Condition No. 12. d. Final Sediment Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan, as required by Rule 62B-41.008(1)(k)4.b.,F.A.C. Once approved by the Department,compliance with the Plan shall be a specific condition of this permit and must be incorporated in the relevant Terms and Conditions of the construction contracts. The Plan shall include project-specific sediment quality specifications for grain size distribution, color, and carbonate composition to ensure that the sediment from the borrow sites will meet the standards in Rule 62B-41.007(2)(j),F.A.C., for the exclusion of non- compatible fill material. The Plan shall provide quality control procedures for excavating sediment from within the authorized horizontal and vertical limits of the permitted borrow sites; for monitoring and reporting the quality of sediment as it is CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 6 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 6 of 21 placed on the beach; and for altering construction operations if the sediment does not comply with the project specific sediment quality specifications or stopping the dredging operation if the specifications cannot be attained. Further,the Plan shall provide procedures for testing the quality of the sediment after it is placed and methods for remediation of any areas of fill material that do not comply with the sediment quality specifications. e. Two hard copies and an electronic copy of detailed final construction plans and specifications for all authorized activities,including a vessel operations plan.These documents shall be signed and sealed by the design engineer who must be registered in the State of Florida, and shall bear the certifications specified in Rule 62B- 41.007(4),F.A.C. The plans and specifications shall include a description of the beach construction methods to be utilized and drawings and surveys which show all biological resources and work spaces(e.g.,anchoring area,pipeline corridors, staging areas,boat access corridors,etc.)to be used for this project. f Turbidity monitoring qualifications. Construction at the project site shall be monitored closely to assure that turbidity levels do not exceed the compliance standards established in this permit. Accordingly, an individual familiar with beach construction techniques and turbidity monitoring shall be present at all times when fill material is discharged on the beach. This individual shall have authority to alter construction techniques or shut down the dredging or beach construction operations if turbidity levels exceed the compliance standards established in this permit. The names and qualifications of those individuals performing these functions along with 24-hour contact information shall be submitted for approval. g. Written verification that the Erosion Control Line has been executed and recorded throughout the entire project area. h. Outfall Management Plan. The County shall submit a long-range management plan (including an identification of viable funding sources) for the removal of storm water outfalls from the beach. Submittal of an acceptable plan will be a requirement of the Notice to Proceed for the second nourishment event. 5. At least 7 days prior to commencement of the initial and subsequent beach nourishment construction activities authorized by this permit,the permittee shall conduct a pre-construction conference to review the specific conditions and monitoring requirements of this permit with permittee's contractors,the engineer of record,FWC and Department staff representatives. The permittee shall provide written notification, at least 14 days in advance of the meeting,to the following offices advising of the date,time,and location of the pre-construction conference. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 7 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 7 of 21 DEP,Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems Attention-JCP Compliance Officer Mail Station 300 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee,Florida 32399-3000 Phone: (850)487-4471 fax: (850)488-5257 DEP, South District Office Submerged Lands&Environmental Resources Program 2295 Victoria Ave, Suite#364 Ft.Myers,Florida 33901-3881 Phone: (239) 332-6975 FWC,ISMS 620 South Meridian Street Tallahassee,Florida 32399-1600 Phone: (850)922-4330 6. Pursuant to Chapter 370.25,Florida Statutes(F.S.),the permittee shall require the selected artificial reef contractor to complete the attached MATERIAL CARGO MANIFESTO form required by the FWC,Division of Marine Fisheries Artificial Reef Program. This form shall be maintained on board the vessel during transport of artificial reef material over state waters. 7. Following construction of the artificial reef(s),the permittee shall complete the attached MATERIALS PLACEMENT REPORT form required by the FWC,Division of Marine Fisheries Artificial Reef Program. Within 30 days following construction,the completed form shall be submitted to the Florida Fish&Wildlife Conservation Commission,Division of Marine Fisheries,Artificial Reef Program,620 S. Meridian Street,Tallahassee,FL 32399 and a copy e- mailed to the JCP Compliance Officer,Bureau of Beaches&Coastal Systems. In addition to attaching the completed form,please indicate on the e-mail that the information is being submitted for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project,Permit No. 0222355-001-JC,as required by Specific Condition 7. 8. The permittee shall construct and maintain a shore-parallel sand dike at the beach placement area at all times during hydraulic discharge on the beach to meet turbidity standards prescribed by this permit. 9. During all dredging operations,the permittee shall require the dredging contractor to have electronic positioning equipment that continuously measures the vertical and horizontal location of the dredge at all times during construction operation. The horizontal positioning equipment shall be installed on the dredge so as to monitor the actual location of the dredge equipment and CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 8 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 8 of 21 be interfaced with the depth-monitoring device. This equipment shall provide a permanent record of the position referenced to State Plane Coordinates and NGVD. The Contractor shall provide telemetry of the instantaneous dredging positioning and digging functions of the project dredges that accommodates electronic charting functions by the Permittee at a remotely located system. As part of the final report,the permittee shall provide a daily record of the position of the dredge equipment which includes the dredge area limits with actual and maximum authorized dredge depth referenced to state plane coordinates and NGVD. Vertical and horizontal accuracy of the positioning equipment shall also be reported. MONITORING REQUIRED: 10. Biological Monitoring. The goal of the biological monitoring program is to evaluate the potential impacts of the project upon the extensive,nearshore hardbottom communities along the project area shoreline and nearshore/offshore communities along the submerged pipeline corridors. The monitoring shall be specifically directed to the assessment of the dynamics of the equilibrium toe of fill. Twenty-four,permanent, 150-meter long,cross-shore monitoring transects shall be established beginning from the preconstruction landward nearshore edge of the hardbottom. Six to eight similar transects will be established north and south of each of the fill segments to monitor hardbottom at the adjacent areas. Eight control transects shall be established in the areas where the effects of beach fill placement are not anticipated. Video surveys and in situ estimations shall be used for the nearshore biological monitoring surveys. At least twenty 0.5m2 quadrats shall be placed along each transect for in situ estimations. The following information shall be collected along each transect:the current position of the nearshore edge of the hardbottom; surveys of the 0.5m2 quadrats(as outlined below); and photographs(taken at permanently established photo quadrats)to document status of scleractinian corals, octocorals, and other prominent organisms observed.. Within each 0.5m2 quadrat,the surveys shall estimate cover by macroalgae and other organisms,number and dimensions of scleractinian corals and octocorals,cover and thickness of loose sediments,and physical relief of hardbottom. The details of the methodology and selected transect locations are attached in the latest version of the Draft Biological Monitoring Plan dated September 22,2004. Multibeam fathometer or side-scan sonar survey and diver verification survey along the nearshore edge of the hardbottom shall be conducted to document the changes in the sand/hardbottom border due to the equilibration of the toe of fill. Aerial photography shall be taken annually for five years,during the summer, at the time of the best visibility in nearshore waters, from an altitude that would allow the photographs to clearly show both the shoreline and sand/hardbottom border. Aerial photography shall also include the artificial reef. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 9 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 9 of 21 Monitoring of the mitigation site shall be conducted using a methodology that is similar to natural hardbottom survey. Ten permanent,20-meter-long transects shall be established over the 1.09-acre mitigation artificial reef immediately after construction. Nearshore hardbottom monitoring, including cross-shore transects and sand/hardbottom border surveys, shall be conducted during the summer prior to construction and then in years 1, 2, 3, and 5 after construction. Reports shall include survey data,data analysis and their interpretation. Reports shall be provided within 60 days of the completion of each survey,but no later than November 1 of each year. Pipeline corridors shall be video surveyed immediately after pipeline placement and immediately after removal. If damage to hardbottom organisms is detected at any time, then the permittee shall immediately attempt to save the damaged organisms,and then report the damage and remediation efforts to the Department(via e-mail to the JCP Compliance Officer). Reports of the video surveys shall include data regarding condition of organisms,data analysis and their interpretation.Reports shall be provided within 60 days of the completion of survey,but no later than November 1 of that year. The reports shall include accurate estimates of the extent of damage to hardbottom communities not previously restored,and failed restoration efforts. The final report shall also propose mitigation for any residual damage to the hardbottom community. The permittee shall conduct physical monitoring as stated below to assess the performance of the project and sediment dynamics over the period of record represented by the surveys. Results of physical monitoring data shall also be used to determine the extent of biological impacts. Physical monitoring data shall be compared to the hardbottom edge survey. All hardbottom cover seaward of the initial (preconstruction)location of the nearshore edge of the hardbottom shall be attributed to the project due to cross-shore sediment transport seaward of the applicant's estimated depth of closure. 11. Physical monitoring Pursuant to 62B-41.005(16),F.A.C.,physical monitoring of the project is required through acquisition of project-specific data to include,at a minimum,topographic and bathymetric surveys of the beach,offshore,and borrow site areas,aerial photography, and engineering analysis. The monitoring data is necessary in order for both the project sponsor and the Department to regularly observe and assess,with quantitative measurements,the performance of the project, any adverse effects which have occurred,and the need for any adjustments, modifications,or mitigative response to the project. The scientific monitoring process also CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 10 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 10 of 21 provides the project sponsor and the Department information necessary to plan,design, and optimize subsequent follow-up projects,potentially reducing the need for and costs of unnecessary work, as well as potentially reducing any environmental impacts that may have occurred or be expected. Prior to issuance of the Notice to Proceed,the permittee shall submit a detailed Monitoring Plan subject to review and approval by the Department. The Monitoring Plan shall indicate the project's predicted design life. The approved Monitoring Plan can be revised at any later time by written request of the permittee and with the written approval of the Department. If subsequent to approval of the Monitoring Plan there is a request for modification of the permit,the Department may require revised or additional monitoring requirements as a condition of approval of the permit modification. As guidance for obtaining Department approval,the plan shall generally contain the following items: Topographic and bathymetric profile surveys of the beach and offshore shall be conducted within 90 days prior to commencement of construction, and within 60 days following completion of construction of the project. Thereafter,monitoring surveys shall be conducted annually for a period of three(3)years,then biennially until the next beach nourishment event or the expiration of the project design life,whichever occurs first. The monitoring surveys shall be conducted during a spring or summer month and repeated as close as practicable during that same month of the year. If the time period between the immediate post-construction survey and the first annual monitoring survey is less than six months,then the permittee may request a postponement of the first monitoring survey until the following spring/summer. A prior design survey of the beach and offshore may be submitted for the pre- construction survey if consistent with the other requirements of this condition. The monitoring area shall include profile surveys at each of the Department of Environmental Protection's DNR reference monuments within the bounds of the beach fill area and along at least 5,000 feet of the adjacent shoreline on both sides of the beach fill area. For those project areas that contain erosion control structures, such as groins or breakwaters, additional profile lines shall be surveyed at a sufficient number of intermediate locations to accurately identify patterns of erosion and accretion within this subarea. All work activities and deliverables shall be conducted in accordance with the latest update of the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems (BBCS)Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects, Sections 01000 and 01100. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 11 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 11 of 21 b. Aerial photography of the beach shall be taken concurrently with the post- construction survey and each annual and biennial monitoring survey required above, as close to the date of the beach profile surveys as possible. The limits of the photography shall include the surveyed monitoring area as described above. All work activities and deliverables shall be conducted in accordance with the latest update of the BBCS Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects, Section 02100. c. The permittee shall submit an engineering report and the monitoring data to the BBCS within 90 days following completion of the post-construction survey and each annual or biennial monitoring survey. The report shall summarize and discuss the data,the performance of the beach fill project, and identify erosion and accretion patterns within the monitored area. In addition,the report shall include a comparative review of project performance to performance expectations and identification of adverse impacts attributable to the project. Appendices shall include plots of survey profiles and graphical representations of volumetric and shoreline position changes for the monitoring area. Results shall be analyzed for patterns,trends,or changes between annual surveys and_cumulatively since project construction. d. Monitoring reports and data shall be submitted to the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems,JCP Compliance Officer, in Tallahassee. Failure to submit reports and data in a timely manner constitutes grounds for revocation of the permit. When submitting any monitoring information to the Bureau,please include a transmittal cover letter clearly labeled with the following at the top of each page: "This monitoring information is submitted in accordance with Item No. [XX] of the approved Monitoring Plan for Permit No. 0222355-001-JC for the monitoring period [XX]. 12. Mitigation In order to offset impacts to an estimated 1.09 acres of nearshore hardbottom communities,which is associated with the seaward spreading of fill to the estimated equilibrium toe of fill(ETOF),the permittee shall build 1.09 acres of low relief artificial reef as the initial mitigation. The construction of this mitigation reef should be completed prior to commencement of beach construction. However,if the construction schedule would not allow up-front mitigation,construction of the mitigation reef shall be completed no later than six months after the completion of the initial nourishment event authorized by this permit. If the mitigation reef is not completed by one year after the commencement of the initial beach nourishment, an additional 0.2 acres of artificial reef shall be added to the mitigation reef to address the time lag CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 12 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 12 of 21 associated with lost productivity. The mitigation requirement shall continue to increase by 0.2 acres for each additional year of delay. Furthermore, if the post-construction monitoring reveals damage to hardbottom communities(due to either burial or sedimentation)exceeding the initial estimate of 1.09 acres, the permittee shall build additional mitigation reef at a ratio of 2:1,due to the time lag. The mitigative artificial reef shall be built of limestone boulders and shall simulate a flat hardbottom with approximately 0.3 to 0.6 meters(1 to 2 feet)of vertical relief. The maximum vertical dimension of the boulders shall be no more than 1.5 m and not less than 1 m,and shall have an average vertical dimension of approximately 1.2 m. The artificial reef shall be constructed in a sandy area with sand thickness not less than 0.3 m(one foot)and not more than 0.6 m(two feet). The artificial reef shall remain at least 15 m(50 feet)away from the nearest hardbottom community(including populated hardbottom communities covered by a thin veneer of sand). The Mitigation Reef Construction Plans and Specifications shall be submitted to the Department no later than 60 days prior to the beginning of the beach fill construction(see Specific Condition 4.c). The Mitigation Reef Construction Plan shall include a map indicating the location of the initial 1.09 acres of artificial reef and also show possible locations for at least an additional acre of mitigation reef,which may be required later. The Plan shall also include a description of the artificial reef construction methods and material used, surveys which show the thickness of the sand in the selected mitigation area(s),the location of adjacent hardbottom communities,and the location of work spaces(e.g., anchoring area, staging areas,boat/barge access corridors, etc.). A notice of completion of the artificial reef construction shall be submitted to the BBCS (compliance officer)within seven days of construction completion. This notice shall include an as-built survey of the artificial reef. Monitoring of the artificial reef shall be conducted and reported according to Specific Condition 11. 13. In order to ensure that marine turtles are not adversely affected by construction activities, the following conditions shall be followed in order to protect nesting marine turtles: a. Beach nourishment shall be started after October 31 and be completed prior to May 1. b. All fill material placed on the beach must be analogous to that which naturally occurs within the project location or vicinity in quartz to carbonate ratio,color,median grain size, and median sorting. The material shall be similar in color and grain size distribution(sand grain frequency,mean and median grain size, and sorting coefficient)to the material in the existing coastal system at the disposal site and shall not contain: i. Greater than five percent,by weight, silt,clay or colloids passing the#230 sieve; ii. Greater than five percent,by weight, fine gravel retained on the#4 sieve; CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 13 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 13 of 21 iii. Coarse gravel,cobbles,or material retained on the 3/4 inch sieve in a percentage or size greater than found on the native beach; iv. Construction debris, toxic material or other foreign matter; and not result in contamination of the beach. v. These standards must not be exceeded in any 1,000 square foot section,extending through the depth of the nourished beach. If the natural beach exceeds any of the limiting parameters listed above,than the fill material must not exceed the naturally occurring level for that parameter. c. Immediately after completion of the beach fill placement event and prior to February 1 for 3 subsequent years if placed sand still remains on the beach,the beach shall be tilled as described below. During the 3 years following each fill placement event,the permittee may measure sand compaction in the area of restoration in accordance with a protocol agreed to by the FWC,the Department,the U.S.Fish&Wildlife Service, and the applicant to determine if tilling is necessary. At a minimum,the protocol provided below shall be followed. If required,the area shall be tilled to a depth of 24 inches. i. All tilling activity must be completed prior to February 1. An annual summary of compaction surveys and the actions taken shall be submitted to the FWC. If the project is completed during the nesting season,tilling shall not occur in areas where nests have been left in place or relocated unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in an Incidental Take Statement. A report on the results of compaction monitoring shall be submitted to the FWC prior to any tilling actions being taken. This condition shall be evaluated annually and may be modified if necessary to address sand compaction problems identified during the previous year. ii. Compaction sampling stations shall be located at 500-foot intervals along the project area. One station shall be at the seaward edge of the dune/bulkhead line (when material is placed in this area)and one station shall be midway between the dune line and the high water line(normal wrack line). iii. At each station,the cone penetrometer shall be pushed to a depth of 6, 12,and 18 inches three times(three replicates). Material may be removed from the hole if necessary to ensure accurate readings of successive levels of sediment. The penetrometer may need to be reset between pushes,especially if sediment layering exists. Layers of highly compact material may lie over less compact layers. Replicates shall be located as close to each other as possible,without interacting with the previous hole and/or disturbed sediments. The three replicate compaction values for each depth shall be averaged to produce final values for each depth at each station. Reports shall include all 18 values for each transects line, and the final 6 averaged compaction values. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 14 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 14 of 21 iv. If the average value for any depth exceeds 500 psi for any two or more adjacent stations, then that area shall be tilled prior to February 1. If values exceeding 500 psi are distributed throughout the project area but in no case do those values exist at two adjacent stations at the same depth,then consultation with the FWC shall be required to determine if tilling is required. If a few values exceeding 500 psi are present randomly within the project area,tilling shall not be required. v. Compaction measurements and tilling shall not occur within'or adjacent to areas being utilized for nesting by shorebirds. d. Visual surveys for escarpments along the beach fill area shall be made immediately after completion of the beach nourishment project and prior to April 1 for the following three years if placed sand still remains on the beach. All scarps shall be leveled or the beach profile shall be reconfigured to minimize scarp formation. In addition,weekly surveys of the project area shall be conducted during the two nesting seasons following completion of fill placement as follows. i. The number of escarpments and their location relative to DNR-DEP reference monuments shall be recorded during each weekly survey and reported relative to the length of the beach surveyed(e.g., 50%scarps). Notations on the height of these escarpments shall be included(0 to 2 feet,2 to 4 feet, and 4 feet or higher) as well as the maximum height of all escarpments. ii. Escarpments that interfere with sea turtle nesting or that exceed 18 inches in height for a distance of 100 feet shall be leveled to the natural beach contour by April 15. Any escarpment removal shall be reported relative to R-monument. iii. If weekly surveys during the marine turtle nesting season document subsequent reformation of escarpments that exceed 18 inches in height for a distance of 100 feet,the FWC shall be contacted immediately to determine the appropriate action to be taken. iv. No scarp removal shall occur within or adjacent to areas being utilized for nesting by shorebirds. e. A lighting survey shall be conducted from the nourished berm prior to April 15 of the first nesting season following nourishment and action taken to ensure that no lights or light sources are visible from the newly elevated beach. A report summarizing all lights visible,using standard survey techniques for such surveys, shall be submitted to FWC by May 15 and documenting all compliance and enforcement action. Additional lighting surveys shall be conducted monthly through August and results reported by the 15th of each month. f. Reports on all nesting activity shall be provided for the initial nesting season and for a minimum of three additional nesting seasons. Monitoring of nesting activity in the four seasons following construction shall include daily surveys and any additional CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 15 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 15 of 21 measures authorized by the FWC.Reports submitted shall include daily report sheets noting all activity,nesting success rates,hatching success of all relocated nests, hatching success of a representative sampling of nests left in place(if any),dates of construction and names of all personnel involved in nest surveys and relocation activities. Data should be reported separately for the nourished areas and for an equal length of adjacent beach that is not nourished in accordance with Table 1 below. Summaries of nesting activity shall be submitted in electronic format(Excel spreadsheets). All reports should submitted by January 15 of the following year. g. In the event a sea turtle nest is excavated during construction activities, all work shall cease in that area immediately and the permitted person responsible for egg relocation for the project should be notified so the eggs can be moved to a suitable relocation site. h. Upon locating a dead,injured,or sick endangered or threatened sea turtle specimen, initial notification must be made to the FWC at 1-888-404-FWCC. Care should be taken in handling sick or injured specimens to ensure effective treatment and care and in handling dead specimens to preserve biological materials in the best possible state for later analysis of cause of death. In conjunction with the care of sick or injured endangered or threatened species or preservation of biological materials from a dead animal,the finder has the responsibility to ensure that evidence intrinsic to the specimen is not unnecessarily disturbed. In the event a hopper dredge is utilized for sand excavation, all conditions in the National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)Biological Opinion for Dredging of Gulf of Mexico Navigation Channels and Sand Mining Borrow Areas Using Hopper Dredges by COE Galveston, New Orleans, Mobile, and Jacksonville Districts (Consultation Number F/SER/2000/01287)must be followed, and the FWC shall be sent copies of the reports specified in the Biological Opinion. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 16 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 16 of 21 Table 1. Marine Turtle Monitoring for Beach Restoration Projects The following monitoring is required for beach restoration projects. Reports summarizing the nesting should be submitted to the Tequesta office with a copy to the Tallahassee office by January 15 of the subsequent year. Data for nesting activity on the nourished beach and on an equal length of beach that is not nourished shall be reported separately, and should include numbers of nests lost to erosion or washed out. Summaries of nesting activity shall be submitted in electronic format(Excel spreadsheets). Characteristic Parameter Measurement Variable Nesting Success False crawls- Visual assessment of all false Number and location of false cruwis in fill areas number crawls and nonfilled areas:any interaction of the turtle with obstructions,such as groins,seawalls,or scarps,should be noted. False crawl- Categorization of the stage at Number in each of the following categories: type which nesting was abandoned emergence-no digging,preliminary body pit, abandoned egg chamber. Nests Number The number of marine tunic nests in filled and nonfilled areas should be noted. If possible,the location of all marine turtle nests shall be marked on map of project,and approximate distance to sea walls or scarps measured using a meter tape. Any abnormal cavity morphologies should be reported as well as whether turtle touched groins, seawalls,or scarps during nest excavation Lost Nests The number of nests lost to inundation,erosion or the number with lost markers that could not be found. Lighting Disoriented sea turtles The number of disoriented hatchlings and adults Impacts shall be documented and reported in accordance with existing FWC protocol for disorientation events. Reproductive Emergence & Standard survey protocol Numbers of the following:unhatched eggs, Success hatching success depredated nests and eggs,live pipped eggs,dead pipped eggs,live hatchlings in nest,dead hatchlings in nest,hatchlings emerged, disoriented hatchlings,depredated hatchlings CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 17 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 17 of 21 14. In order to ensure that shorebirds are not adversely affected by construction activities,the following conditions shall be followed in order to protect shorebirds: a. Shorebird surveys should be conducted by trained,dedicated individuals using accepted, appropriate ecological survey procedures(for example,see"Breeding Season Population Census Techniques for Seabirds and Colonial Waterbirds Throughout North America"at URL: http://www.mp2-pwrc.usgs.gov/cwb/manual/) during the shorebird nesting season,February 1 through September 1. i. Nesting season surveys shall begin on February 1 or 45 days prior to construction commencement,whichever is later, and be conducted daily throughout the construction period or through September if no shorebird nesting activity is observed. ii. For projects conducted in piping plover habitat, surveys to detect piping plovers or concentrations of other wintering or migratory shorebirds should begin 14 days prior to construction commencement and be conducted once every 2 weeks for all work from December through April. Each shorebird species observed,a rough estimate of numbers of each species,the location of the birds, and their activity (e.g., foraging,resting,nesting,courtship behavior)should be logged and reported to the FWC Regional Wildlife Diversity Conservation Biologist monthly. iii. The FWC Regional Wildlife Diversity Conservation Biologist shall be contacted at(561)625-5133 within 24 hours if shorebird nesting occurs within or immediately adjacent to the project area. b. Buffer Zones and Travel Corridors. Within the project area,the permittee shall establish a 300 ft-wide buffer zone around any location where shorebirds have been engaged in courtship or nesting behavior,or around areas where piping plovers occur or winter migrants congregate in significant numbers. Any and all construction activities, including movement of vehicles,should be prohibited in the buffer zone. i. The width of the buffer zone shall be increased if birds appear agitated or disturbed by construction or other activities in adjacent areas. ii. Site-specific buffers may be implemented upon approval by FWC as needed. iii. Designated buffer zones must be posted with clearly marked signs around the perimeter. These markings shall be maintained until nesting is completed or terminated,the chicks fledge,or piping plovers or winter migrants depart. iv. No construction activities or stockpiling of equipment shall be allowed within the buffer area. v. FWC-approved travel corridors should be designated and marked outside the buffer areas. Heavy equipment,other vehicles,or pedestrians may transit past nesting areas in these corridors.However,other activities, such as stopping or CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 18 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 18 of 21 turning, shall be prohibited within the designated travel corridors adjacent to the nesting site. vi. Where such a travel corridor must be established within the project area it should avoid critical areas for shorebirds(known nesting sites,wintering grounds,FWC- designated Critical Wildlife Areas,and USFWS-designated critical piping plover habitat) as much as possible, and be marked with signs clearly delineating the travel corridor from the shorebird buffer areas described above. vii.To the degree possible,the permittee should maintain some activity within these corridors on a daily basis,without directly disturbing any shorebirds documented on site or interfering with sea turtle nesting,especially when those corridors are established prior to commencement of construction. Passive methods to modify nesting site suitability must be approved by the FWC Wildlife Diversity Conservation Biologist for that region. c. Notification. If shorebird nesting occurs within the project area,a bulletin board will be placed and maintained in the construction area with the location map of the construction site showing the bird nesting areas and a warning,clearly visible, stating that"BIRD NESTING AREAS ARE PROTECTED BY THE FLORIDA THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AND THE FEDERAL MIGRATORY BIRD ACT." d. Tilling. All tilling and scarp removal should be done outside the shorebird nesting season(February 1 through September 1). If necessary,contractors should contact the FWC Regional Wildlife Diversity Conservation Biologist at(561)625-5133 to obtain data on known shorebird nesting areas. It is the responsibility of the contractors to avoid tilling or scarp removal in areas where nesting birds are present. i. A relatively even surface,with no deep ruts or furrows, shall be created during tilling. To do this,chain-linked fencing or other material shall be dragged over those areas as necessary after tilling. ii. The slope between the mean high water line and the mean low water line must be maintained in such a manner as to approximate natural slopes. e. If it will be necessary to extend construction pipes past a known shorebird nesting site or over-wintering area for piping plovers,then whenever possible,pipes should be placed landward of the site before birds are active in that area.No sand shall be placed seaward of a known shorebird nesting site during the shorebird nesting season. 15. In order to ensure that manatees are not adversely affected by construction activities,the following conditions shall be followed in order to protect manatees: CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 19 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 19 of 21 a. The permittee shall instruct all personnel associated with the project of the potential presence of manatees and the need to avoid collisions with manatees.All construction personnel are responsible for observing water-related activities for the presence of manatee(s). b. The permittee shall advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming,harassing,or killing manatees which are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, The Endangered Species Act of 1973,and the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act. c. Siltation barriers shall be made of material in which manatees cannot become entangled, are properly secured, and are regularly monitored to avoid manatee entrapment. Barriers must not block manatee entry to or exist from essential habitat. d. All vessels associated with the construction project shall operate at"no wake/idle" speeds at all times while in the construction area and while in water where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four-foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will follow routes of deep water whenever possible. e. If manatee(s)are seen within 100 yards of the active daily construction/dredging operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions shall be implemented to ensure protection of the manatee. These precautions shall include the operation of all moving equipment no closer than 50 feet of a manatee. Operation of any equipment closer than 50 feet to a manatee shall necessitate immediate shutdown of that- equipment. Activities will not resume until the manatee(s)has departed the project area of its own volition. f Any collision with and/or injury to a manatee shall be reported immediately to the FWC Hotline at 1-888-404-FWCC. Collision and/or injury should also be reported to the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service in Jacksonville(1-904-232-2580)for north Florida or Vero Beach(1-561-562-3909)in south Florida. g. Temporary signs concerning manatees shall be posted prior to and during all construction/dredging activities. All signs are to be removed by the permittee upon completion of the project. A sign measuring at least 3 ft.by 4 ft.which reads Caution:Manatee Area will be posted in a location prominently visible to water related construction crews. A second sign should be posted if vessels are associated with the construction, and should be placed visible to the vessel operator. The second sign should be at least 8-1/2"by 11"which reads Caution:Manatee Habitat. Idle speed is required if operating a vessel in the construction area. All equipment must be shutdown if a manatee comes within 50 feet of operation. Any collision with and/or injury to a manatee shall be reported immediately to the FWC Hotline at 1- CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 20 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 20 of 21 888-404-FWCC. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service should also be contacted in Jacksonville (1-904-232-2580)for north Florida or in Vero Beach (1-561-562-3909) for south Florida. 16. Water Quality-Turbidity-Nephelometric Turbidity Units(NTUs) Frequency: Twice daily at least 4 hours apart during all disposal operations. Location: Background: At mid-depth, at least 300 meters upcurrent from the dredge discharge point and clearly outside the influence of any turbidity generated by the project. Samples shall be collected at the surface and mid-depth. Compliance: no more than 150 meters downcurrent from the point where return water from the dredge discharge enters waters of the State,within the densest portion of any visible turbidity plume. Samples shall be collected at the surface and mid-depth. All monitoring data shall be submitted within one week of analysis with documents containing the following information: (1)"Permit Number 0222355-001-JC,Collier County Beach Nourishment Project"; (2)dates of sampling and analysis; (3)a statement describing the methods used in collection,handling, storage and analysis of the samples; (4)a map indicating the sampling locations; (5)a statement by the individual responsible for implementation of the sampling program concerning the authenticity,precision, limits of detection and accuracy of the data Monitoring reports shall also include the following information for each sample that is taken: (a) time of day samples taken; (b) depth of water body; (c) depth of sample; (d) antecedent weather conditions; (e) tidal stage and direction of flow; and (f) wind direction and velocity. The compliance locations given above shall be considered the limits of the temporary mixing zone for turbidity allowed during construction. If monitoring reveals turbidity levels at the compliance site greater than or equal to 29 NTUs above background turbidity levels at the corresponding background site,construction activities shall cease immediately and not resume until corrective measures have been taken and turbidity has returned to acceptable levels. Any such occurrence shall also be immediately reported to DEP's Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems (JCP Compliance Officer),Phone: (850)487-4471, and the DEP South District office in 2295 Victoria Ave, Suite#364,Ft. Myers,Florida 33901-3881,Phone: (239) 332-6975. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 21 of 29 Joint Coastal Permit Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Permit No. 0222355-001-JC Page 21 of 21 Monitoring reports shall be submitted to the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems in Tallahassee and to the DEP South District office. Failure to submit reports in a timely manner constitutes grounds for revocation of the permit. When submitting this information to the DEP, please clearly include, at the top of each page or as a cover page to the submittal: "This information is provided in partial fulfillment of the monitoring requirements in Permit No. 0222355-001-JC,Collier County Beach Nourishment Project." Executed in Tallahassee,Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Michael R.Barnett,P.E.,Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED, on this date,pursuant to Section 120.52,Florida Statutes, with the designated Department Clerk,receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. — GC/I!l -4J /42-45-- Deputy /2-4s Deputy Clerk Date 31 pages attached. CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 22 of 29 % �� 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Old Business VIII-4 n�� : JACKDecember 8,2005 SONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 5 of 128 P.O.BOX 4970 JACKSONVILLE,FLORIDA 32232-0019 ;' --11 uc re' REPLY TO ATTENTION OF November 17, 2005 Regulatory Division South Permits Branch West Permits Section SAJ-2004-12405 (IP-MN) Gary McAlpin, Coastal Project Manager Collier County Government 3050 Horseshoe Drive, Suite 218 Naples, Florida 34104 Dear Mr. McAlpin: We are pleased to enclose the Department of the Army permit and a Notice of Authorization which should be displayed at the construction site. Work may begin in accordance with the terms and conditions of the issued permit but the appropriate Regulatory Section Chief as representative of the District Engineer must he notified of: a. The date of commencement of the work. b. The dates of work suspensions and resumptions if work is suspended over a week, and c. The date of final completion. A map showing Regulatory field offices, addresses, and telephone numbers can be found on our website at www.saj .usace.army.mil/permit/offices/geographic_alignment.htm. The field office is responsible for inspections to determine that permit conditions are strictly adhered to. A copy of the permit and drawings must de available at the site of work. IT IS NOT LAWFUL TO DEVIATE FROM THE APPROVED PLANS ENCLOSED. ' (C U j2Sincerely, G-rA si Lawrence C. Evans I Chief, Regulatory Division Enclosures r CO 0 fi O +,,^^J r (h .4..l CO to 1 'd N dwE Q)o o a1 W 4 "0 N 3w 3in N CT 4 tel 44 D, iN4 CO 1:14 .•-, el p r.4 5 E ti) 0.) 0 Ns ci) 00 r4\ 8 cri lio' I ,4 U� N,. • 9, w rd0 as 14 QA 1 al ;meg oC6 U p 0 c.., oV ON C Q '" b Co) y rel W d O ^ VL it `� U ^ V) o �1IIMMMI . ; Ch o pp 40 cC o O 0 W ,+� Z , -,. -';I-,; 0 .p (n 04 g cNi 0 .- CD ®* �, RS O O tai) N In 6'I) ' _.. CI1 CD CL)� .0d- M 1- Cn cd o 4, � '" (1) 114 b,..c..? .?' d- �. ' ''c9 N .- cno •—iC4C) 0 E 0 0 v)c NCO , 1 .r0, 0 (,) .... p 4_, ;,...1 � o F+ .° a E- UU , o aOZ ..�� CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 24 of 29 December 8,2005 Old Business VIII-4 7 of 128 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permittee: COLLIER COUNTY BCC Permit No. SAJ-2003-12405 (IP-MN) Issuing Office: U. S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: To periodically renourish Vanderbilt, Park Shore, Naples, Pelican Bay, and North Park Shore beaches over a 10-year period. The initial renourishment will involve the discharge approximately 825, 000 cubic yards (cy) of sand with up to 800, 000 cubic yards of sand placed on these beaches over 10 years on 6-8 year renourishment cycles. The borrow area (T1) is located approximately 33 miles to the east northeast of Vanderbilt Beach. The method of sand placement will be through hopper dredging. All work is to be completed in accordance with the attached plans numbered SAJ-2003-12405 (IP-MN) in 28 sheets dated 10-3-05 and Attachment "A" entitled "Standard Hopper Dredge Conditions" dated November 21, 2003 . Project Location: Sections 29 and 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Sections 5, 8, 16, 21 and 28, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, and Sections 4 and 9, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Gulf of Mexico, Collier County, Florida. Permit Conditions: General Conditions: 1 1 . The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on Nov 1,2015 . If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 1 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 25 of 29 December 8,2005 Old Business VIII-4 8 of 128 2 . You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3 . If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4 . If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature and mailing address of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5 . If a conditioned water certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it contains such conditions. 6 . You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. Special Conditions: 1 . The attached Specific Conditions of Water Quality Certification/Permit number 0222355-001-JC issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) on January 12, 2005, address most of the conditions that the District Engineer (DE) has determined are necessary to satisfy legal and public interest requirements for issuance of this permit. Therefore, all of the FDEP permit specific conditions are hereby incorporated into this Department of the Army (DA) permit including the conditions related to the artificial reef construction, shorebird management plan, and Florida manatee construction conditions. 2 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 26 of 29 December 8,2005 Old Business VIII-4 9 of 128 2 . The permittee shall adhere to all the conditions contained in the attached Biological Opinion for nesting sea turtles dated September 20, 2005, by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 3 . The permittee shall adhere to the conditions contained in Attachment "A" to this permit document and to the Regional Biological Opinion issued by the NMFS for hopper dredges dated October 11, 2003 . Further Information: 1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to: (X) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) . (X) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) . ( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413) . 2 . Limits of this authorization. a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, state, or local authorizations required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others . d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal projects. 3 . Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. 3 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 27 of 29 December 8,2005 Old Business VIII-4 10 of 128 c . Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit . d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 4 . Reliance on Applicant ' s Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 5 . Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (see 4 above) . c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326. 4 and 326 . 5 . The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209 . 170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6 . Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit. Unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit. 4 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 28 of 29 December 8,2005 Old Business VIII-4 11 of 128 Your signature below, as permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. Mel 41304601 I ?DOS"' YE ))4cjut jA/ (DATE) GOGG!✓/Icle. Cou v Ty Cools 7 v P,toJJ 14 J This permit becomes effective when the Federal official, designated to act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed below. / /(/i 7/2ao� STRIC ENGINEER) (DATE) Robert M. Carpenter Colonel, U.S. Army 5 CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Reports 29 of 29 December 8,2005 Old Business VIII-4 12 of 128 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT TRANSFER REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER:_SAJ-2003-12405(IP-MN)_ When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. Although the construction period for works authorized by Department of the Army permits is finite, the permit itself, with its limitations, does not expire. To validate the transfer of this permit and the responsibilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below and mail to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Division, Post Office Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida, 32232-0019 . TRANSFEREE-SIGNATURE DATE (NAME-PRINTED) (NAME OF SUBDIVISION) (ADDRESS) (Lot #) (Block #) • (CITY, STATE, AND ZIP CODE) (TELEPHONE NUMBER W/AREA CODE) 6 CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports EXHIBIT L: STANDARD DETAILS 1 of 21 Potential Upland Sand Sources to Support Southwest Florida Beach Projects Depending on project size and timeline, upland sand sources(mines)may be viable for beach construction projects in southwest Florida. There are several large-scale mining operations that have the capacity and quality of material needed to support beach projects; each mining facility has differing sorting techniques and is able to create customized product to meet project requirements. The following pages serve as a brief overview of the upland sand source options for the 2013 Collier County Beach Renourishment Project. Granularmetric reports and grain size distribution curves are provided for recent beach grab samples as well as mine samples that meet project requirements. Table 1: Mine Name Company *Approximate Driving Distance to Naples Immokalee Stewart Mining Industries 58 miles Witherspoon Vulcan Materials Co. 78 miles Lake Wales Cemex 158 miles *Approximate one-way driving distance calculated using Google Earth Nomosassa Sprinpsl\s,, 5 x zf r 1n1 J:, Ktirs4lih Spring H dlli ii. ei 0 . 4. 1' '•1.Jiii,.r� 1211 else r.1r,» , • �'I� t r11•,� . J ,..1.,..1.,1,0.l &MiltPet rsbu #: ,` �t- . 441 .14101.1 • • t Charloni veal j St 9,8 p 1i L' Immok0lee Oliwi r::J to c. Cofa1 Hprinv i s- wJ1,T.A»3 Nip t .,r 41 O' Saunas:Esrs NUT,..r.AVTEC.ISGS.Into..I.FC. !:9CAK.Esri Arran.HETI EsMICI•ina:I' Q Kmar Esri MINE LOCATIONS Tn.irna,.T Tm•23,2Ceryrpnrs2ar.E.n.c.ierme MVTEC.Tomtit., Figure 1: Mine Location Map CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 2of21 Stewart Mining Industries'Immokalee Mine The Stewart Immokalee mine is located in the South Florida region in northern Collier County (Figure 1). The mine's location in Collier County makes it the closest upland source. The mine has supplied sand for several successful beach nourishment projects in the past including the recent emergency renourishment project of Collier County beaches (December 2012). Capacity is not considered problematic as Stewart Immokalee expects to produce sand for at least 30 more years. The Immokalee sand is extracted from the lake pit by hydraulic dredge and pumped through pipes to a sand processing plant (Figure 2). The processing plant first removes larger material using vibrating screens with spray bars. The remaining smaller grains are separated into 11 different gradations using water and gravity. The sand is then remixed depending on the client's specifications and fed into dewatering screws. The dewatering screws remove remaining fines due to their weir-like effect. The resulting sand is placed onto a conveyor and stacked in a sand pile. e .4.I, rb+ .e-,... ►.+' 11Agg -10 o 1 4; 1..Yta 111 Figure 2: Stewart Immokalee hydraulic dredge(left) and processing plant(right). Stewart Mining Industries had their beach sand tested in triplicate by Dunkelberger Engineering &Testing, Inc. and the results are provided in the following pages as well as summarized below. The beach sand sample was tested for carbonate content by Coastal Planning &Engineering's Geotechnical Laboratory to CPE-HAT-09 test standards. Immokalee's Mean Grain Size Sorting Silt Content Munsell Carbonate Beach Sand Range(mm) Range Range(%) Color Value Content (%) 0.31 -0.32 0.81 - 0.84 0.2- 1.3 8 1 ct - t N 0 0 4- N fz 0 - N M Q F d �� i 1 o Ena a)> Q = U N N O O N O N N Z.-. N 4- N N a) a fC :F O O t Q a • o 0 0 0 w o -- --�.. __ cc , u U v Z in- m _ — —--.— -- a o 0 0 0 40 O a> 0 0 — 0 y M 90 H = �4T N O U W SL f J Z - iii 4b a '4 i2 a E Z• V g 7,5 m CX r.lii D p V- W c o'YM - Z m .- m A ro Z fn.' `. ■ v a u I IN ____ _ !: f U V) C co W a504 ■ I z o c +c '- o O v U 0 O u Di `o m tL S tu =°4 • a m 2. = w Y. • 0 .11 W w r mco Y - 4• in d uo Z4 • ..__-_—_–_–__ ra W U N U p 1L U >• L 'r9 • m fu _o O O u 0 W Y 11E 7 N .. '9 Z '''1, U U' z .- N M .r Fr -. - I- 111:111‘4 -111:81n‘n s:avie fa1Jdld CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 4 of 21 DUNKELSERGER ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. Geotechnical-Materials Testing-Inspection-Environmental Beach Sand Sample Sieve Analysis Testing Results -Sample No. 18 Collier County Emergency Beach Restoration Project Test No. 1 2 3 4 ' Average U.S SIEVE Cummulative Passing (%) 314" 100.00 1(10.00 100.(x) 100.00 100.00 5/8" 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 #3.5 100.0)) 100.00 101).00 100.00 100.00 #4 100.00 100,011 100.00 100.01) 100.00 #5 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 #7 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.01) 100.00 #10 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 #14 99.50 99.40 99.90 99.30 99.60 #18 97.60 97.60 99.50 97.6() 98.23 #25 91.6() 91.50 97.60 91.6() 93.57 #35 77.80 78.00 91.50 78.00 82.43 #45 01.20 61.50 77.70 61.30 66.80 #60 39 10 39.20 61 30 39.10 46.53 #80 15.70 16.00 38 90 15.90 23.53 #120 5.20 5.20 15 90 5.311 8.77 #170 1.20 1.30 5.10 1,30 2.53 #230 0.60 0.70 1.30 0.60 0.87 N ',- ,- - t N 0 0%G- NI NI 0_0 _ a N 1a E E — CA a > 1 H E R a U { N N F. IA O O N N 1.0 C9 N r a a O 0 av t a aN Q , 0 0 o o a E o U • c —. a �$ __ '# 0 0 0 0 h U W 4 J Z - DO c % u1 " u o ��/'� a c E Z• a % • �' o u n C N 9r • c v v W r • S Z t N ii W M i a c R > • a il .... _--.---. - -- C 0 c __ CO c I asiLl C 2o rs Iii . u t 2CZ Wv T p :_ 4 • ii i • m (n 'D °b r aE d — — ... "' L , T, co U G o 75 u 0 ro v • E a ri z `°;. • u a a` .e Mo N E N w UIt11:1N\0'k1%3 14y 3.1H d CAC September 11,2014 VH-1 Staff Reports 6 of 21 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING 8 TESTING, INC. Geotechnical-Materials Testing-Inspection-Environmental Beach Sand Sample Sieve Analysis Testing Results -Sample No. 19 Collier County Emergency Beach Restoration Project Test No. 1 2 3 4 f Average U.S SIEVE Cummulative Passing (%) 314" 100.00 1(0.01) 100.00 100.00 100.00 5/8" 100.00 100,00 100.00 10().00 100.00 #3.5 100.00 1(0.0(1 100.00 100.00 100.00 #4 100.00 10(1.011 100.00 100.(10 100.00 #5 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 #7 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 #10 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 #14 99.50 99.60 99.90 99.50 99.67 #18 97.80 98.0() 99.50 97.90 98.43 #25 92.30 92.40 97.90 92.30 94.20 #35 80.4() 80.40 92.40 8(1.10 84,40 #45 65.50 65.70 80.40 64.70 70.53 #60 .42.60 43.30 65.-I(.) 42.40 50.43 #80 16.0() 16.21) 42 90 15.50 26.03 #120 4.90 5.00 16.50 5.00 8.80 #170 1.10 1.20 4.90 1.20 2.40 #230 0.60 0.60 1.10 0.50 0.TT I I I - N C N O O ri N O. 0 - N Ns Q m E —� _ E N 4 1 E O a. CO G U { 1 Q C N N N CO 6 0 ry wa v) ry .- ..Si ui 0 0 a? .t v c a Q 2 0 0 0 0 y E Z v' Z c • — C k • , el e r N M CO O 1, 0 0 .- O W �4 Z rib % 15 d E H C • o ` a n 'r 2• m 'y1 t .5 R 1 � ♦ c a u — j E m o O u U u cos m W •E •.- % • —— — — E ,r: 0i L W fa ;: ofa R o fl Oa 0 ` 3 m 0 it a1 0 Z `1+ in c . o — — N > w = y u > Sli LI -C Ci O uU CO ItO_------ ___—_._ .____ ____ -._.__ > v) C •/ • E N 3 z El +f r p _ z o • .- .- N M .f N I- - 1.11'11:111 W 11 VI IIs,1111 Id CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 8 of 21 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. Geotechnical-Materials Testing-Inspection-Environmental Beach Sand Sample Sieve Analysis Testing Results -Sample No. 20 Collier County Emergency Beach Restoration Project Test No. 1 2 3 4 I Average U.S SIEVE Cummulative Passing (%) 3/4" loom) 10).00 100.00 100.00 100.00 5/8" 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.0(1 100.00 #3.5 10(.01) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 #4 100.00 10(11)1) 100.00 10).1)1) 100.00 #5 100.00 10).(10 100.00 100.00 100.00 #7 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 #10 99.90 99.90 99.90 100.0(1 99.90 #14 99.60 99.50 99.90 99.60 99.67 #18 97.80 97.30 99.50 97.8(1 98.20 #25 92.00 91.40 97.80 91.90 93.73 #35 78.80 78.70 91.90 79.10 83.13 #45 62.80 62.90 78.90 63.30 68.20 #60 41.00 -10.30 63.10 40.9() 48.13 #80 15 8(1 15.50 40.50 16.3() 23.93 #120 5.30 4.70 16 M) 5.10 8.67 #170 1.30 0.90 5.20 1.30 2.47 #230 0.70 0.20 1.30 1.1.60 0.73 Page 2 CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 9of21 Vulcan Materials Company's Witherspoon Mine The Vulcan Witherspoon mine is located in the South Florida region in southern Glades County (Figure 1). The Witherspoon mine is located adjacent to the Jahna Ortona mine and claims the deepest dredge in the western hemisphere (200 ft, Figure 3). Capacity for the purpose of sand nourishment in Collier County is not considered problematic as the Witherspoon mine expects to produce sand for at least 30 more years. Figure 3: Vulcan Witherspoon hydraulic dredge(left) and processing plant(right). The sand is extracted from the lake pit by hydraulic dredge and pumped through pipes to a sand processing plant (Figure 3). The processing plant first removes larger material using vibrating screens. The remaining smaller grains are separated into 11 different gradations using water and gravity. The sand is then remixed depending on the client's specifications and fed into dewatering screws. The dewatering screws remove remaining fines due to their weir-like effect. The resulting sand is placed onto a conveyor and stacked in a sand pile. Vulcan Materials Co. had their fine beach sand tested by Allied Engineering&Testing, Inc. and the results are provided in the following pages as well as summarized below. The fine beach sand sample was tested for carbonate content by Coastal Planning&Engineering's Geotechnical Laboratory to CPE-HAT-09 test standards. Witherspoon's Mean Grain Size Sorting Silt Content Munsell Carbonate Fine Beach (mm) (%) Color Value Content(%) Sand 0.35 0.86 0.0 7 1 CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 10of21 Granularmetric Report Depths and elevations based on measured values ALLIED ENGINEERING&TESTING, INC. Project Name: Witherspoon 5850 Corporation Circle Sample Name: Fine Beach Sand FortphMyers,00 Florida 33905 Analysis Date: 12-05-12 $00- -6833 fax 239-344-6614 Analyzed By: Emilie MI NWa,r4141. c,vtn.a Stun E evatrc.01) Florida State Plane East Lisa I IMnse, C<ananls SW f D miti kii wain waahl N) Paa R .a nravted r9 S'atai,t':1 t2 r 0 CO "'%I Csrcana a,,x, mase t+‘r 258.60 #230-0.00 I Sieve Number Sieve Size Sieve Size Grams %Weight Cum.Grams C.%Weight (Phi) (Millimeters) Retained Retained Retained Retained 4 -2.25 4 76 0.00 0.00 0 00 5 -2 00 4.00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 7 -1.50 2.83 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 10 -1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.00 - 14 -0.50 1.41 0.40 015 0,40 0.15 18 0.00 100 4.10 1.59 4.5C 1.74 - 25 0.50 0.71 21.20 8.20 25.70 9.94 35 100 •.� 0.50 66.20 25.60 91.90 35.54 - 45 1.50 0.35 • 45.60 17.63 137 50 53.17 60 2.00 0.25 36.9C 14.27 174.40 67.44 - 80 2.50 0.18 40 60 15.70 215.00 83 14 120 3.00 013 37.10 14.35 252.10 97.49 170 3.50 0.09 6.00 2.32 258.10 99.81 200 3.75 0.07 0.50 0.19 258.60 100.00 230 4 00 0 CS I 0.00 000 258 60 100.00 0 v. 8 t a Lr i Phi 5 Phi 16 1 Phi 25 Phi 50 Phi 75 Phi 84 Phi 95 2_91 2.53 I 2 24 1.41 0.79 0 62 0.20- - Moment Mean Phi Mean mm Sorting Skewness Kurtosis Stai:stics 1.51 0.35 0.86 0.16 2 05 .:I- r,- O O v- N 0-O cu ;_ _ cu 1 f 0 j r IUM 43 gismeo°tua2Jad U o O r rOi a uQi np �+ $,...,.- 0 I 116 __- — — _ — P e _ N 61 zate .. �_——— r E I- -- n a :n 8 > 0 rn g I a a Q to 1 z° '- >° r! N M i _ _ VCJ C f __ te n n IIIIO B. " ., 3 0 _ v _ C W �� r . _ ___J t0 ji 0 NP .n l- I _{ I 0 Hy V 8 Et qF ff - _ 4. Ito y T U PI 1 d e I ' ;i fiV+ xp�5LL ._. —1 eo t�U C eill l o i�}053 t E t —_.._ ae U ' c W a 0 .. _. _--- .- __--_ ..._ _ _—._ ._____. C W tl dLE0E1 __ r i a o 2> 2 . n 8 8 v g N a 0 �` E �' e Percent Finer By Weight u. _ LS I _---- mat?' 100 2iS022 2001J Mill 0titti2‘.E SIRAT/HY IAIIS CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 12 of 21 U7425n Witheroon Sand Plant 0West SR 78 Moore Haven,FL 33471 883-875-5866 Materials Company I lr,rida Hock L)Ivisu,n Quality Test Report Plant 1539-Witherspoon Sand Plant 05-505 1111111p1111111 Product 399-Beach Sand Specification /IR131111 1 Sample Information Sample No 1251870231 Split Sampler Sequence Date Sampled 01103/2013 10:05 ResampteD Code Sampled By Cuvvy Drayton Lot 1 Sublot Type Production Quad I Quantity Method Tube Location Test Note Process Fine Beach Sand Ledge Other Weather Temp Gradation Results Date Completed 01/03/2013 10:05 Tested By Jim Farmer Unit Moist Mass Dry Mass Wash Mass Moisture% Wash Loss% Procedure 9 247.40 Cum Mass Ind% Sieve Mass Retained Retained Retained %Retained %Passing Target Specification Comment #4(4.75mm) #5(4mm) #7(2.8mm) #10(2mm) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 #14(1.4mm) 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 99.9 #18(1mm) 2.2 2.4 0.9 1.0 99.0 #25(0.71mm) 15.7 18.1 6.3 7.3 92.7 #35(0.5mm) 66.2 84.3 26.8 34.1 65.9 #45(0.355mm) 52.9 137.2 21.4 55.5 44.5 #60(0.25mm) 40.8 178.0 16.5 71.9 28.1 #80(0.18mm) 35.5 213.5 14.3 86.3 13.7 #120(0.125mm) 29.2 242.7 11.8 98.1 1,9 #170(90um) 4.3 247.0 1.7 99.8 0.2 #230(63um) 0.4 247.4 0.16 100.00 0.00 Pan 0.0 247.4 0.00 100.00 0.00 aggaC 01/03/2013 Vulcan Materials Company CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 13of21 Cemex's Lake Wales Mine The Cemex Lake Wales mine is located in the Lake Wales Ridge region in central Polk County (Figure 1). Transportation costs may be a limiting factor as Lake Wales is the greatest distance from Collier County beaches and does not have a rail option. The material produced at the Lake Wales site is mined by a hydraulic dredge (Figure 4). The slurry is pumped to an initial processing plant that uses vibrating screens and spray bars. The remaining smaller grains are pumped to another processing plant that separates the material into 11 different gradations using water and gravity. The sand is then remixed depending on the client's specifications and fed into dewatering screws. The dewatering screws remove remaining fines due to their weir-like effect. The resulting sand is placed onto a conveyor and stacked in a sand pile. tib p .lryy5 wV•r'.'wwawww':i1'wlw...pis+ dx NmM..„'��.e �. a4140$001,10.A"-:--* ✓ •K K$$ 7:10"' wd F .. _ .1 1 • „ 4 k rAlk ' 4 P d -.. * `4 ie Figure 4: The hydraulic dredge(left) and initial processing removing large material(right) at Cemex Lake Wales. Raw sieve data for the fine beach sand was provided by Cemex. Coastal Planning& Engineering's Geotechnical Laboratory calculated grain size statistics and tested the sample for carbonate content using CPE-HAT-09 test methods. Lake Wale's Mean Grain Sorting Silt Content Munsell Carbonate Fine Beach Size(mm) (%) Color Value Content(%) Sand 0.35 0.82 0.0 8 0 CAC September 11,2014 VH-1 Staff Reports 14 of 21 Granularmetric Report Depths and elevations based on measured values Project Name: Collier Beach Renourishment Sample Name: Lake Wales Analysis Date: 02-11-13 Analyzed By: TD Lea-g Mr 410.4114;111) C144 Ziysterr Linraltx.4111 Florida State Plane East llSCE 1 1.4,4441 Cerra-4444 Wet-10YR-8/2 SP _ I Dry-10m-ti Fine Beach Sand Collected Jan.2013 Cry WWII(;j1 ;'NW.nAttM 10 hilt RC444V11 it) '!love Lass 6,1 ihiCoV-0.02 cciar"('') ca6x1o'. (''' Iskulast'i‘" 363.00 363.00 0.01 , 0.00 #230-0.00 0 Sieve Size Sieve Size ' Grams %Weight Cum.Grams C.%Weight Sieve Number (Phi) (Millimeters) ' Retained Retained Retained Retained -4.25 19.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5/8" -4.00 16.00 , 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7/16" -3.50 11.31 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 5/16" -3.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.5 -2.50 5.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 -2.25 476 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 -2.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 -1.50 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ _ 10 -1.00 2.00 0.60 0.17 0.60 0.17 14 -0.50 1.41 2.90 0.80 3.50 0.97 18 0.00 1.00 11.50 3.17 15.00 4.14 25 0.50 0.71 30.60 8.43 45.60 12.57 ,--- 35 1.00 0.50 , 45.00 12A0 90.60 24.97 45 1.50 0.35 79.10 21.79 169.70 46.76 60 2.00 0.25 96.10 26.47 265.80 73.23 80 2.50 0.18 54.30 14.96 320.10 88.19 120 3.00 0.13 ' 35.80 9.86 355.90 98.05 --,---- 170 3.50 009 7.00 1.93 362.90 99.98 200 3.75 0.07 0.00 0.00 362.90 99.98 230 4.00 0.06 , 0.09 0.02 362,99 100.00 Shill Wilt'ailmitsltki Emir'ALIA imilliadiii a eve•4 7S1444,KM.7 Cm, T- 1 Phi 5 : Phi 16 Phi 25 Phi 50 Phi 75 Phi 84 Phi 95 -,- -i- , 2.85 2.36 11 2.06 1.56 1.00 0.64 0.05 . Moment ; Mean Phi I Mean mm Sorting Skewness Kurtosis , ! Statistics . 1.51 0.35 i 0.82 -0.28 2.86 .- 't N 0 O v- 01 N Q O cu a aa) 103190 t461eM xe wea,s d d 8 0 U o c P QSQ `e B o 0 g 111 1 - �_.____-----------_ ____ __.__ _ g a 4 , D N • . 1 i r' I o m o — O A ?'t U be . off. N O. 4 2 "o2 Y ` C __._ ._.....-.__..__...._.. ._.._._ `off KQ 1I f2 } I 00 n c ro r.. <o u� a e-, N Percent Finer By Weight I U .. ........ ......... _..... -...... . _._. ._...___.._.__.._._._---__.�..______..__...�___..___..__ _ -__L_.. C111 -..__S .7Z 1J�l2YN&If fd�J 2.9Z S31406 9Vtl`JAINIX7:7 Mai 116:1 S�SAIVNV 3A3i CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 16of21 SEDIMENT QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN FOR BEACH OR DUNE RESTORATION USING AN UPLAND SAND SOURCE 0222355-001-JC Collier County Naples Beach Nourishment Project A.INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Fla.Admin. Code r. 62B-41.008 (1)(k)4.b.,permit applications for inlet excavation,beach restoration, or nourishment shall include a quality control/assurance plan that will ensure that the sediment from the borrow areas to be used in the project will meet the standard in Fla.Admin.Code r. 62B-41.007(2)(j). To protect the environmental functions of Florida's beaches, only beach compatible fill shall be placed on the beach or in any associated dune system. Beach compatible fill is material that maintains the general character and functionality of the material occurring on the beach and in the adjacent dune and coastal system. The Department has received the results of geotechnical investigations that provide adequate data concerning the character of the sediment and demonstrate that it meets the sediment specifications provided in this document. The Department has received an analysis of the existing or native sediment and the sediment within the permitted upland sand source(s), including the methods of mining and post-mining processing, that demonstrates its compatibility with the naturally occurring beach sediment in accordance with Fla.Admin.Code r.62B-41.007(2)(j).The sediment analyses were performed using established industry standards,and are certified by a Professional Engineer(P.E.)or a Professional Geologist(P.G.)registered in the State of Florida. Based upon this information,the Department of Environmental Protection(Department)has determined that use of the sediment from the upland sand source(s) will maintain the general character and functionality of the sediment occurring on the beach and in the adjacent dune and coastal system. Furthermore, this information provides sufficient quality control/quality assurance(QC/QA)that the mean grain size and carbonate content of the sediment from the upland sand source(s) will meet the requirements of Fla.Admin.Code r.62B-41.007(2)(j); hence, additional QC/QA procedures are not required for these sediment parameters during construction. This plan outlines the responsibilities of each stakeholder in the project as they relate to the placement of beach compatible material on the beach.These responsibilities are in response to the possibility that non-beach compatible sediments may exist within the upland sand source(s) and could be unintentionally placed on the beach. The QC Plan specifies the minimum construction management, inspection and reporting requirements placed on the Contractor and enforced by the Permittee,to ensure that the sediment from the upland sand source(s)to be used in the project meet the compliance specifications. The QA Plan specifies the minimum construction oversight, inspection and reporting requirements to be undertaken by the Permittee or the Permittee's On-Site Representative to observe,sample,and test the placed sediments to verify the sediments are in compliance. B.SEDIMENT QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS The sediment from the upland sand source(s)is similar in Munsell color and grain size distribution to the material in the existing coastal system at the beach placement site. The Department and the Permittee acknowledge that it is possible that discrete occurrences of non-beach compatible sediments may exist within the permitted upland sand source(s)that do not comply with the limiting parameters of Fla.Admin.Code r. 62B-41.007(2)(j) 1.—5.,or vary in Munsell color from the composite value. Furthermore,the Department may consider more restrictive values for the sediment parameters to ensure that the sediment from the upland sand source(s) is similar in color and grain size distribution to the sediment in the existing coastal system at the beach placement site. Therefore, fill material compliance specifications for the sediment from the upland sand source(s) proposed for this project are provided in Table 1. CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 17of21 The compliance specifications take into account the variability of sediment on the native or existing beach,and are values which may reasonably be attained from the upland sand source(s). Beach fill material which falls outside of these limits will be considered unacceptable and subject to remediation. Table 1-Sediment Compliance Specifications Sediment Parameter Parameter Definition Compliance Value Max.Silt Content passing#230 sieve 3% Max. Shell Content* retained on#4 sieve 1% Maximum Sorting Average sorting in phi 1.00 4 Munsell Color Value moist Value(chroma= 1) 7 or lighter The beach fill material shall not contain construction debris,toxic material,other foreign matter, coarse gravel or rocks. *Shell Content is used as the indicator of fine gravel content for the implementation of quality control/quality assurance procedures. C.QUALITY CONTROL PLAN The contract documents shall incorporate the following technical requirements, or equivalent language that addresses the sediment quality monitoring on the beach,and,if necessary,remedial actions.The Permittee will seek to enforce these contract requirements during the execution of work. The Contractor's Quality Control Plan shall be submitted for review and acceptance by the Permittee. This Plan shall also address sediment quality assurance by including: (1) the specific sampling frequency and testing methodology to be provided by the Contractor, (2) the name, address and point of contact for the Licensed Testing Laboratory to be used for the required collection of samples and laboratory testing, and (3) how the Contractor intends to assess compliance with the Sediments Compliance Specifications as shown in Table 1 above. The characteristics of the in-situ materials in the upland sand source(s)are indicated the geotechnical data,including the boring logs and grain size distribution curves. The characteristics of the processed material are also included with the geotechnical data. However, the Contractor should be aware that it is possible for material of differing characteristics to be present and that the mining process may correspondingly require revisions to produce beach compatible sand consistent with the Sediment Compliance Specifications in Table 1. 1. Assessment at Upland Sand Source. The material shall be observed while the material is being loaded into the trucks for transport to the Construction Access/ Staging Area. Both the Contractor and the Permittee will have benchmark samples labeled with the permit number, "Benchmark Sample", date collected, site name and information on where the sample was attained. The benchmark sample shall be material that has been deemed beach compatible in accordance with the Sediment Compliance Specifications and shall serve as the minimum requirement for the material being placed on the beach. If any material appears to be non-compliant, it shall be set aside for testing and/or further processing and not transported to the beach. a. For conventional hydraulic excavation and stockpiling. The Contractor will collect a sediment sample at not less than 4 samples for each 3,000 cubic yards of stockpiled material to visually assess grain size,Munsell color,shell content,and silt content against the benchmark sample. The sample shall be a minimum of 1 U.S. pint (approximately 200 grams). This assessment will consist of handling the fill material to ensure that it is predominantly sand to note the physical characteristics and assure the material meets the sediment compliance parameter specified in this Plan. If deemed necessary, quantitative assessments of the sand will be conducted for grain size, silt content, shell content and Munsell color using the methods outlined in section D.7.b. Each sample will be archived with the date, time, and location of the sample. The results of these daily inspections, regardless of the quality of the sediment, will be appended to or notated on the Contractor's Daily Report. All samples will be stored by the Permittee for at least 60 days after project completion. b. For material requiring special handling and material processing. If special handling and material processing are necessary to produce beach compatible material consistent with the Sediment Compliance CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 18 of 21 Specifications in Table 1,then sampling and laboratory testing of the processed sand shall be conducted at the upland mine(s) from the stockpiled material before the material is transported to the Construction Access/Staging Areas. The Contractor will collect 4 representative samples from approximately every 3,000 cubic yards of material in the stockpile no less than 6 inches below the surface. The samples shall be tested at a Licensed Testing Laboratory using the criteria outlined in Section D.7.b. If a sample does not meet the Sediment Compliance Specifications in Table 1,then the 3,000 cubic yards of material represented by that sample shall not be transported to the Construction Access/Staging Area. The material may undergo further processing to meet the Sediment Compliance Specifications with additional testing to verify the additional processing produce material that meets the Sediment Compliance Specifications,or the material shall be set aside and not used. 2. Beach Observation. The Contractor will continuously visually monitor the sediment being placed on the beach. Each truckload of material will be visually compared to the benchmark sample prior to placement on the beach to insure that the material meets the minimum sediment compliance specifications. This assessment will consist of handling the fill material to ensure that it is predominantly sand and to note the physical characteristics, and assure the material meets the Sediment Compliance Specifications in Table 1. If noncompliant sediment is identified,that truckload of material will be rejected and will not be placed on the beach. The Contractor will immediately cease placement until any stockpiled material at the beach construction staging area can be verified as beach compatible and verbally notify the Permittee's On-site Representative, providing the time, location, and description of the noncompliant sediment. The Contractor will take the appropriate remediation actions as directed by the Permittee or Permittee's Engineer. D.QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The Permittee will seek to enforce the construction contract and Department permits related to sediment quality. In order to do so,the following steps shall be followed: 1. Construction Observation. Construction observation by the Permittee's On-Site Representative will be performed daily basis during periods of active construction. The Permittee's On-Site Representative will collect a sediment sample from each truckload of material to visually assess grain size,Munsell color, shell content, and silt content against the benchmark sample. The observation will include handling the fill material to ensure that it is predominantly sand to note the physical characteristics and assure the material meets the sediment compliance parameter specified in this Plan. If deemed necessary, quantitative assessments of the sand will be conducted for grain size,silt content,shell content and Munsell color using the methods outlined in section D.7.b. 2. On-Site Representative. The Permittee will provide on-site observation by individuals with training or experience in beach nourishment and construction inspection and testing,and who are knowledgeable of the project design and permit conditions. The project Engineer will actively coordinate with the Permittee's On-Site Representative,who may be an employee or sub-contractor of the Permittee or the Engineer. Communications will take place between the Engineer and the Permittee's On-Site Representative on a weekly basis. 3. Pre-Construction Meeting. The project QC/QA Plan will be discussed as a matter of importance at the pre- construction meeting. The Contractor will be required to acknowledge the goals and intent of the above described QC/QA Plan,in writing,prior to commencement of construction. 4. Contractor's Daily Reports.The Permittee's On-Site Representative will review the Contractor's Daily Reports which will characterize the nature of the sediments encountered at the upland sand source and placed along the project shoreline with specific reference to moist sand color and the occurrence of rock,rubble,shell,silt or debris. 5. On Call. The project Engineer will be continuously on call during the period of construction for the purpose of making decisions regarding issues that involve QC/QA Plan compliance. 6. Addendums. Any addendum or change order to the Contract between the Permittee and the Contractor will be evaluated to determine whether or not the change in scope will potentially affect the QC\QA Plan. CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 19of21 7. Post-Construction Sampling for Laboratory Testing. To assure that the fill material placed on the beach was adequately assessed by the borrow area investigation and design, the Project Engineer will conduct assessments of the sediment as follows: a. Post-construction sampling of each acceptance section and testing of the fill material will be conducted to verify that the sediment placed on the beach meets the expected criteria/characteristics provided during from the geotechnical investigation and borrow area design process. Upon completion of an acceptance section of constructed beach, the project Engineer will collect two (2) duplicate sand samples at each Department reference monument profile line to quantitatively assess the grain size distribution, moist Munsell color, shell content, and silt content for compliance. The Engineer will collect the sediment samples of a minimum of 1 U.S.pint(at least 200 grams)each from the bottom of a test hole a minimum of 18 inches deep within the limits of the constructed berm. The Engineer will visually assess grain size, Munsell color, shell content, and silt content of the material by handling the fill material to ensure that it is predominantly sand, and further to note the physical characteristics. The Engineer will note the existence of any layering or rocks within the test hole. One sample will be sent for laboratory analysis while the other sample will be archived by the Permittee. All samples and laboratory test results will be labeled with the Project name, FDEP Reference Monument Profile Line designation,date sample was obtained,and"Construction Berm Sample." b. All samples will be evaluated for visual attributes (Munsell color and shell content), sieved in accordance with the applicable sections of ASTM D422-63 (Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils), ASTM D1140 (Standard Test Method for Amount of Material in Soils Finer than No. 200 Sieve), and ASTM D2487(Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes),and analyzed for carbonate content.The samples will be sieved using the following U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers: 3/4", 5/8", 3.5,4, 5, 7, 10, 14, 18, 25, 35,45,60, 80, 120, 170,and 230. c. A summary table of the sediment samples and test results for the sediment compliance parameters shall accompany the complete set of laboratory testing results. The column headings will include: Sample Number; Mean Grain Size (mm); Sorting Value: Silt Content (%); Shell Content (%); Munsell Color Value; and a column stating whether each sample MET or FAILED the compliance values found in Table 1. The sediment testing results will be certified by a P.E or P.G.registered in the State of Florida. A statement of how the placed fill material compares to the sediment analysis and volume calculations from the sand search investigation and borrow area design shall be included in the sediment testing results report. The Permittee will submit sediment testing results and analysis report to the Department within 90 days following beach construction. d. In the event that a section of beach contains fill material that is not in compliance with the sediment compliance specifications, then the Department will be notified. Notification will indicate the volume, aerial extent and location of any unacceptable beach areas and remediation planned. E.REMEDIATION 1. Compliance Area.If a sample does not meet the compliance value for construction debris,toxic material,other foreign material,coarse gravel,or rock the Permittee shall determine the aerial extent of the noncompliant beach fill material and remediate regardless of the extent of the noncompliant material. If a sample is noncompliant for the silt content,shell content,or Munsell color,and the aerial extent exceeds 10,000 square feet of beach berm or 100 linear feet of dune for dune-only projects,the Permittee shall remediate. 2. Notification. If an area of newly constructed beach or dune does not meet the sediment compliance specifications,then the Department(JCPCompliance@dep.state.fl.us)will be notified.Notification will indicate the aerial extent and location of any areas of noncompliant beach fill material and remediation planned. As outlined in section E.4 below,the Permittee will immediately undertake remediation actions without additional approvals from the Department. The results of any remediation will be reported to the Department following completion of the remediation activities and shall indicate the volume of noncompliant fill material removed and replaced. CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 20 of 21 3. Sampling to determine extent.In order to determine if an area greater than 10,000 square feet of beach berm or 100 linear feet of dune for dune-only projects is noncompliant, the following procedure will be performed by the Permittee's On-site Representative or Engineer: a. Upon determination that the first sediment sample is noncompliant, at minimum, five (5) additional sediment samples will be collected at a maximum 25-foot spacing in all directions and assessed. If the additional samples are also noncompliant,then additional samples will be collected at a 25-foot spacing in all directions until the aerial extent is identified. b. The samples will be visually compared to the acceptable sand criteria. If deemed necessary by the Engineer, quantitative assessments of the sand will be conducted for grain size, silt content, shell content, and Munsell color using the methods outlined in section D.7.b. Samples will be archived by the Permittee. c. A site map will be prepared depicting the location of all samples and the boundaries of all areas of noncompliant fill. d. The total square footage will be determined. e. The site map and analysis will be included in the Contractor's Daily Report. 4.Actions.The Permittee or Permittee's Engineer shall have the authority to determine whether the material placed on the beach is compliant or noncompliant. If placement of noncompliant material occurs, the Contractor will be directed by the Permittee or Permittee's Engineer on the necessary corrective actions. Should a situation arise during construction that cannot be corrected by the remediation methods described within this QC/QA Plan, the Department will be notified. The remediation actions for each sediment parameter are as follows: a. Silt: blending the noncompliant fill material with compliant fill material within the adjacent construction berm or dune sufficiently to meet the compliance value,or removing the noncompliant fill material and replacing it with compliant fill material. b. Shell: blending the noncompliant fill material with compliant fill material within the adjacent construction berm or dune sufficiently to meet the compliance value or removing the noncompliant fill material and replacing it with compliant fill material. c. Munsell color: blending the noncompliant fill material with compliant fill material within the adjacent construction berm or dune sufficiently to meet the compliance value or removing the noncompliant fill material and replacing it with compliant fill material. d. Coarse gravel: screening and removing the noncompliant fill material and replacing it with compliant fill material. e. Construction debris,toxic material,or other foreign matter: removing the noncompliant fill material and replacing it with compliant fill material. All noncompliant fill material removed from the beach will be transported to an appropriate upland disposal facility located landward of the Coastal Construction Control Line or returned to the upland mine. 5. Post-Remediation Testing. Re-sampling shall be conducted following any remediation actions in accordance with the following protocols: a.Within the boundaries of the remediation actions,samples will be taken at maximum of 25-foot spacing. b. The samples will be visually compared to the acceptable sand criteria. If deemed necessary by the Engineer, quantitative assessments of the sand will be conducted for grain size, silt content, and Munsell color using the methods outlined in section D.7.b. Samples will be archived by the Permittee. c. A site map will be prepared depicting the location of all samples and the boundaries of all areas of remediation actions. 6.Reporting.A post-remediation report containing the site map,sediment analysis,and volume of noncompliant fill material removed and replaced will be submitted to the Department within 7 days following completion of remediation activities. All reports or notices relating to this permit shall be emailed and sent to the Department at the following locations: DEP Bureau of Beaches&Coastal Systems JCP Compliance Officer Mail Station 300 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard CAC September 11,2014 VII-1 Staff Reports 21 of 21 Tallahassee,Florida 32399-3000 phone:(850)414-7716 e-mail:JCP Compliance@dep.state.fl.us End of Plan FDEP Version dated April 26,2010 o •+�111�I� z , , 0,..L **71:17"'.:11: > 6 immll 1, 4, , . = ' 14 01"...1.' ,,,, X 1 4 rai massio!--i..: - ' ° o� Oleander DR fxora DR ,�t� ," S OMB sao4S41nD • '°. ., ; m,,.+ N m « Z- rex D .s �-s x . iii , h Z 0 .,m N r R . e 4 drier RD �m S1S S1S43ti �a� O• A :$ ti S 1S 449. 1S 439 ;> S 1S 449 ,.�fn + S 1S 449' is 431 y o f +w. ° . ; S 1S 439 "" S A ` lS 410 1S y39 .. * 441S Hy6., 'S :ee:1:17 • S1S431 p m•;, #0,74` •ft„,,, ,t.".!.......,1SH16fr,, , .. ,la m !�, g .0 , 4.gip . ,6 . i. t ' R 0 sthSTs { ''w- ) .,L m D z 'rrh Z ,' 9 (, Z '' r, ^ tfC� "'+s m �.y4GOODLETTE-FRANK RD N1'p '"""� C� �„� c Riverside CIR y,r,., r C e* f ' �' Sty AVFN 1' # a . i $' r / r 0 ''y' * 'y + • 'T m Vinland DR v N u v C t ,,-.. 4 , North RD 7� v. Z • E W CO IDPier A ###��rl l r-w sf d 1.4. ► 4 ° Pier B �ro� .o ff: O ' 8 04 'I% Pier E Pier H 'jr.o Y s r r 4004 :,e 74 0 < r7 • YYY f 9 r Pine ST ?<"'» �A a 70 0 i ,.1.4t• re\,,. l' - 12 2 1 . , a 1 m "�. '." ,n z 61 iv m �r/ o n River DR Bayside ST, § 1 ' N lr 7--Q 4- +'. S x O 7C _ _ a, Ik _ ,o Gordon ST .• y c n 4 o < < FUEL FARM RD I 3.•, " I - - D -••m D o ,.� N c r -! `stsmm 1,01o 0 ay G °„� Tern DR a < A *co y D 4 a , < NIF M c -skit DR Iia"ed ,0a < i m m m Fm-� m , 'tm � _ o' C) k � - _ < w ,fit m �...,.� y =. .II' a i m ym ..o m� DL� m,. ^ a s. g _ Esther STS` 0 t < D < D B A m 1 x. . mm *m, . . 10 '''''. I :lir• � . . • Debron DR . I CJI I ';-' FOXTAIL CT f+-- LIVINGSTON RD / IGH NO1SONIAI1 iN "•1: Foxfire LN } - < C I 0 Q- C 0 et00 '"�. „mil „,,,, 0 .. .70th ST SW 41 S rill ,,,b' F r es zm " ! „J '. �` p C _.'g68hSTSW 3 0 a ,. ;. Leawood CIR` g >; 2 4.,''�'t!,7..,-7' t .:, ••� •.---. , Fillmore ST: - g n Cape Sable DR „ * , t. E A x • _'`` , su "(t' r BlueSkysDR i cD >; o y, k.• e .. r + ' Oceans BLVD• Kim DR SAINT CLAIR SHORES RD 64th ST SW 00 FIT .+CD ctizzA;i2) Tina LN' � Fa 0 1,1 I Marblehead DR , .< �, i; . ''4444 4 �'i': ® ..62nd ST SW " ■ 4. .. County Barn RD ' " • CAC September 11,2014 VII-7 Staff Report 1 of 1 From: Coor,Jennifer To: McAIpinGarv;Flynn.Bryan D IBrvan.FlynnRatkinsglobal.corrl)(Bryan.FlvnnCalatkinsgJobal.com) Cc: Cheno.Chiu Subject: Notice to Proceed submittal for Naples Beach 0222355-001-JC Date: Friday,August 22,2014 3:21:36 PM 1 lello Gary and Bryan, C:'hirl and I had a brief meeting this a(tenmon regarding the notice to proceed (NCP) requirements. We agreed that we will review all pertinent documents and have the notice to proceed documentation drafted prior to the conclusion of your bidding process, as we understand you are scheduled to begin construction on November 1, 2014. We will issue the notice to proceed pending the recipient of the bid and receipt of a mine assay from that recipient. If the recipient is not a previously approved source, you will need a permit modification. I will be reviewing the proposed QA/QC plan, and prior to my approval I will need to know which upland sand source you will be using (to verify that it is an approved source). Please provide a mine assay dated within 6 months of the construction start date (including grain size data/distribution., mean grain size, Munsell color, sorting, percent silt, and percent gravel) as soon as possible - submission of a physical sample will be at your discretion. Please be sure to include a row on Table I of the QA/QC plan indicating the mean grain size range for the material to he obtained from an upland source. Please feel free to contact me if you have any additicmaI geotechnical comments or questions. Please contact Chiu for any permitting comments or questions. Best wishes, Jennifer Jennifer L. Cool., Ph.D. Coastal Geologist h:ngineering,I lydroloty and Geology Program Division of Plater Resource Management Florida Dept of I tavironrnental Protection 2600 Blair Stone Road Mail Station 3503 I allahassee, Florida 32390 leleptone: (850) 2,I5-7580 _..9.De 21 meat .�_1:i?:ll,,lanv.S_u 1C} ftegioa 3003 Cbamhlcc'fiicl;cr'Hal Manta,Ga .103+I E4ARiy FEMA EtgND SEG` August 1, 2014 Mr. Bryan Koon, Director Florida Division of Emergency Management 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Attention: Steven Hyatt Reference: FEMA-1609-DR-FL Collier County PA ID 021-99021-00 First Appeal, Project Worksheet 2700 Dear Mr. Koon: This is in response to Collier County's (Subgrantee) first appeal of Project Worksheet (PW) 2700. The Subgrantee has appealed the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) disallowance of costs associated with renourishing sand on public beaches. The amount in dispute is $11,095,283.52. Background High winds and strong wave action during FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma) in October 2005 caused erosion to nearly six miles of sand from Naples Beach. As a result of this damage, FEMA obligated PW 2700 version 0 to renourish 58,641 cubic yards (CY) of disaster-related sand lost on the county-maintained beach. The PW also included costs associated with dune repair, mobilization, demobilization, engineering and surveys. The estimate for PW 2700 version 0 was $3,381,940.54. FEMA subsequently processed PW 2700 versions 1 and 2 which did not modify the scope of work or related estimates, but revised the funding to account for the cost share increase granted for the disaster declaration. At the Grantee's and Subgrantee's request, FEMA later obligated PW 2700, version 3, on August, 27, 2010, nearly five years after FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma) was declared. This version captured a pro-rated amount of the total sand renourishment quantities that the Subgrantee attributes to FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma). This increased the PW funding from $3,381,940.54 to $12,868,465.94. In addition to the FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma) PW, the Grantee submitted final inspection PWs for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle) and FEMA-1602-DR-FL (Katrina) which likewise requested costs at the pro-rated amount of the 1 www.ferna.gov total renourishment project. FEMA denied the final inspection amount for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle) and the Subgrantee appealed this denial. Due to permit requirements causing delays in the FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle) renourishment, the Subgrantee performed a single beach renourishment project incorporating the PWs from FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle), FEMA-1602-DR-FL (Katrina) and FEMA-1609- DR-FL (Wilma). Then, in draft final inspection reports,the Grantee pro-rated the costs across all three disasters. As stated above, when the costs were presented to FEMA for reimbursement, the cost overruns due to this pro-rated costs claimed for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle) were denied. The Subgrantee appealed this decision and FEMA denied both the first and second appeals. As the re-nourishment was completed through a combination of PWs across all three disasters, the second appeal also addressed all PWs associated with the renourishment project, to include PW 2700 for FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma). The second appeal decision stated that"Given that the mainland and Marco Island renourishment projects included both eligible and ineligible work, and the fact that this response only affects the PWs under FEMA-1393-DR-FL, Regional PA staff should reexamine the costs funded by PWs under FEMA-1602-DR-FL and FEMA- 1609-DR-FL to deobligated duplicative environmental and turtle monitoring costs and to ensure FEMA reimburses only eligible sand replacement costs." In accordance with the second appeal decision's guidance, the Regional PA staff reviewed PW 2700, and in Version 61 disallowed $11,095,283.52 in costs, reducing the final cost to $1,773,192.42 in June 2012. This deobligation was the result of adjusting the scope of work hack to the original 58,641 cubic yards (CY) of sand that was calculated in PW 2700 version 0 based upon pre- and post-storm surveys of Naples Beach. These surveys were conducted by the Subgrantee's engineering firm, Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CPE). This deobligation is the subject of this appeal. FEMA's rationale for determining that the original sand volumes as captured in the original PW versions were the eligible amounts of the disaster loss to be funded under the PW, and not the pro-rated amounts presented by the Grantee in the final inspections, was explained in the second appeal as follows: There is too much uncertainty about typical erosion before, between and after the events (Gabrielle, Katrina, and Wilma) for reliable use of this information to determine disaster damage. The sand volumes calculated for the eligible scopes of work are based on survey data that was available when the PWs were prepared and represent the most reliable pre- and post-storm profile data. The Applicant has not demonstrated that a survey of losses (from its consultant, Coastal Planning and Engineering (CPE)) over a nearly six year period is more accurate than the (unit cost) estimates prepared for the PWs. FEMA prepared PW 2700 versions 4 and 5 to capture administrative changes that did not modify the approved scope of work or cost estimate. 2 Discussion The Grantee's first appeal letter presents four separate issues; each will be discussed and addressed separately. Issue 1 —FEMA has Not Correctly Determined the Amount of Eligible Replacement Sand In its appeal, the Subgrantee maintains that its consultant's calculations of sand loss already have taken the placement of yearly maintenance sand into account, and that FEMA has erred in not recognizing this fact. The Subgrantee maintains that the CPE engineering report presents evidence that hidden damages were present on the beaches that were not discovered until the pre- nourishment survey was done for the 2006 nourishment. As discussed in the above-mentioned second appeal, sand volume losses are to be based on pre- and post-storm surveys, as these surveys best represent the storm-related sand loss. FEMA recalculated the original sand volume loss to Naples Beach using the recommended unit cost method identified in the second appeal. The 58,641 CY loss, as identified in the approved PW scope of work for Naples Beach, was multiplied by $30.2381 per CY which represents the actual contract costs plus a unit cost for monitoring, resulting in the revised PW cost of$1,773,192.41. The Subgrantee's argument that FEMA did not take into account maintenance sand does not apply to this method of calculating the FEMA-eligible scope of work. FEMA's methods for calculating eligible sand loss resulting from a disaster declaration, as confirmed by the FEMA- 1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle) second appeal response, is to calculate sand loss based upon the pre- and post-storm profiles. The maintenance sand placed on the beach before the pre-storm profile or after the post-storm profile has no bearing on the calculations of eligible sand loss as a result of the damage event. The engineering report provided by CPE dated October 15, 2012 and revised on January 23, 2013, states that the increase in its sand loss calculations is due to hidden damages, as the post storm survey measured the beach changes before full equilibration occurred. The claimed sand loss measured by CPE in the pre-and post-disaster surveys for Wilma was 58, 641 CY. The sand loss proposed in this report for FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma) was 304,598 CY. However, the sand loss claimed for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle) and FEMA-1602-DR-FL (Katrina) appear to remain the same in the report produced after the second appeal response. In addition, as stated in the second appeal decision for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle), "These projects renourished the beaches to their design for the first time since original nourishment in 1996. While they did replace the eligible sand losses from the three disasters, they also replaced sand eroded from the beaches before, between and after the declared events, as well as sand placed on areas outside of the eligible projects." Therefore, the most reliable source of disaster related damages are the pre- and post-disaster surveys. Issue 2—FEMA has Not Afforded Proper Deference to the Subgrantee's Engineering Report In its appeal, the Subgrantee states its consultant's beach engineering report satisfied, in part, the environmental monitoring requirements imposed by the Florida Department of Environmental 3 Protection (FDEP). The report then became a part of the State's permit, thus entitled to a higher degree of deference. FEMA, the Subgrantee claims, should be required to prove why the report is wrong, rather than tasking the Subgrantee to prove why the report is true. FEMA maintains that there is no conclusive evidence in the engineering report that the sand loss is storm-related, and that the report raises no substantive new issues than what was addressed and referred to in the previously discussed second appeal decision under FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle). A Subgrantee's engineering report used for the purposes of documenting environmental monitoring compliance and obtaining permits, does not establish FEMA eligibility, but rather documents the Subgrantees plans for re-nourishment and monitoring. In addition,the documentation used to prepare the original PWs and establish the approved scope of work, which is sand loss demonstrated through pre- and post-storm beach profiles, was also provided by the Subgrantee's Engineering Reports. Also, the Subgrantee's pre-nourishment survey of June 2006 extended out to the 400 foot distance mark, while the November 2005 and all previous surveys extended out to the 800 foot distance mark. This inconsistency in surveying has not been explained. Issue 3 —FEMA is Improperly Holding the Subgrantee to the Initial Approved Scope Estimates In its appeal,the Subgrantee presents information as to why it believes FEMA returned to the original version 0 project costs and scope. One issue raised was that the PW stated that the increased amount of sand would be ineligible because it represented an ineligible scope of work change. When FEMA obligates a PW, it contains an approved Scope of Work for which the Subgrantee can seek reimbursement of actual costs. Importantly, the approved scope of work is not an estimate, but rather the cost to complete the approved scope of work is estimated. If, as work progresses, a change in scope of work is needed, the Subgrantee must demonstrate that the change is due to storm-related damages in order to make the work eligible for FEMA funding. As such, changes in scope of work should be requested and evaluated by FEMA prior to the work being done, so that eligibility can be determined and proper environmental compliance be completed and documented. For this appeal, however, the issue is not necessarily the timing of the request, but the fact that the work has not been demonstrated to be storm-related. Inclusion of this ineligible sand in the original scope of work constitutes an ineligible scope of work change. Issue 4— Section 705(c) of the Stafford Act Precludes FEMA's Deobligations Section 705(c) of the Stafford Act provides that a"State or local government shall not be liable for reimbursement or any other penalty for any payment made under this Act if(l) the payment was authorized by an approved agreement specifying the costs; (2) the costs were reasonable; and (3) the purpose of the grant was accomplished." In its appeal, the Subgrantee asserts that the Subgrantee met these three criteria. FEMA obligated PW 2700 Version 3 for FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma) on August 27, 2010, to increase the PW funding from $3,381,940.54 to $12,868,475.94 as a result of the Subgrantee's 4 method of pro-rating the project costs across the three disasters and its claim that there was an increased sand loss due to hidden damages. The second appeal for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle) was dated May 14, 2012, which required FEMA to revisit PW 2700 for FEMA-1609- DR-FL (Wilma) and fund only the eligible sand loss resulting from the declared event as documented by pre- and post-storm surveys. As a result of that review, FEMA completed the deobligation action for FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma) in PW 2700, in version 6 on June 21, 2012. The increase in work is not eligible, which makes the costs for the ineligible work inherently not reasonable. Section 705(c) of the Stafford Act is thus inapplicable. Dune Repair, Mobilization and Demoblilization, Engineering and Survey Costs FEMA has reviewed all the documentation provided with the appeal and our PW files. Based upon the information, FEMA has determined that the pre- and post-storm surveys conducted by the Subgrantee's engineering firm, CPE, best represent the storm-related sand losses eligible under PW 2700. In reviewing PW 2700 version 6, FEMA reduced the eligible costs to include the 58,641 CY in sand loss resulting from FEMA-1609-DR-FL (Wilma) and used the unit cost identified in FEMA's second appeal response for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle), which is $30.2381. The unit cost includes the contract costs for sand, as well as a unit cost to cover the force account monitoring costs. The method for deriving this cost is described in the second appeal for FEMA-1393-DR-FL (Gabrielle). The PW 2700 version 6 also disallowed the costs for dune repair, mobilization and demoblilization, engineering and survey costs which had been allowed in version 0 of PW 2700. As these costs were eligible, FEMA will reinstate these costs as provided in version 0, as depicted below: PW 2700 Collier County FEMA-1609-DR-FL Item Measure Unit Unit Cost Total Sand replacement CY 58641 $30.23812* $ 1,773,192.42 Dune repair LF 21850 $50 $ 1,092,500.00 Mob and de-mob LS 1 $506,273 $ 506,273.00 Engineering LS 1 $171,982.68 $ 171,982.68 Survey LS 1 $83,000 $ 83,000.00 Total $ 3,626,948.10 Conclusion Based on all available information, the appeal is partially approved. FEMA will prepare a version to PW 2700 to reinstate $1,853,755.68 in costs for dune restoration, engineering, mobilization and demobilization and surveys at the original obligated amount. The Subgrantee may appeal this determination to the Assistant Administrator, Recovery Directorate, at FEMA Headquarters pursuant to 44 CFR § 206.206, Appeals. If the Subgrantee elects to file such a second appeal,the appeal must: (1) contain documented justification 2 This unit cost was taken from FEMA's second appeal response for FEMA-1393-DR-FL(Gabrielle),which included the force account monitoring costs into the unit cost. The number of units remains the same as PW 2700 version 0. 5 supporting the Subgrantee's position, (2) specify the monetary figure in dispute, and (3) cite the provisions in federal law, regulation, or policy with which the Subgrantee believes the initial action was inconsistent. A second appeal must be submitted to the Florida Division of Emergency Management (FLDEM) by the Subgrantee within 60 days of the Subgrantee's receipt of this letter. FLDEM transmittal of that appeal, with recommendation, is required to be submitted to my office within 60 days of your receipt of the Subgrantee's letter. My office will transmit the second appeal to FEMA headquarters. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Jesse F. Munoz, CEM, Director, Recovery Division, at (770) 220-5300. Sir ely, f /4i IPA ak.....") Andrew Velasquez III Acting Regional Administrator 6 CAC September 11,2014 VII-9 Staff Reports 1 of 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve filing a Second Appeal from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) First Appeal level decision concerning the Hurricane Wilma (FEMA-1609-DR- FL)PW-2700 fund deobligation in the amount of$11,172,272. OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board authorization to file a Second Appeal to FEMA's First Appeal level decision that partially reinstated$1,853,755.68 of the$11,172,272.00 in deobligated funds. CONSIDERATIONS: On August 1, 2014, Collier County received notice from the Florida Department of Emergency Management ("FDEM") that the County's First Appeal to the $11,172,272 deobligation of Hurricane Wilma-PW 2700 was approved in part and denied in part.See FEMA's August 1, 2012, Correspondence. FEMA reinstated $1,853,755.68 in expenses for soft costs such as dune repairs, engineering and surveys as outlined in the original Version 0 of PW 2700. However, FEMA failed to address the County's argument concerning the application of additional sand quantities needed following the sand loss after Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma and denied reinstatement for that portion of the deobligated funds. In addition, FEMA failed to include all of the environmental monitoring costs required as part of the beach restoration project. Outside counsel, Ernest Abbott with the law firm Baker Donelson, Bearman, Caldewll &Berkowitz, P.C., believes that there is a reasonable chance of receiving a significantly increased reimbursement of the remaining deobligated funds and recommends filing the Second Appeal. See Mr. Abbott's Attached August 26, 2014, Memorandum. It is also Mr. Abbott's opinion that because the reinstatement of the $1,853,755.68 in deobligated funds was to correct a FEMA error, those funds should not be in jeopardy by pursuing a Second Appeal. The legal costs to pursue the $9.2 million by filing a Second Appeal is estimated to cost less than $50,000. The County must file its appeal with FDEM no later than September 30, 2014. At Mr. Abbott's suggestion, the Department of Growth Management is also requesting authorization to allow a peer review be conducted on the original CP&E technical sand analysis with the objective of strengthening and justifying the technical discussion. County staff will work with the County Attorney's Office, outside legal counsel and the county's consultants to integrate this additional analysis into a comprehensive appeal document. FISCAL IMPACT: Initial funding of$100,000 was approved on the September 11, 2012 BCC meeting (Item 11H). Funds will be provided from TDC Category A-Fund 195. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There are no Growth Management Impacts from this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for Board approval.—JAK RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve filing a Second Appeal from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) First Appeal level decision concerning the Hurricane Wilma (FEMA-1609-DR-FL) PW-2700 fund deobligation in the amount of$11,172,272 and direct staff to take action as outlined above. Prepared by: Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney Attachments: (1) FEMA's August 1, 2012 First Appeal Letter, and(2)Ernest Abbott Memorandum CAC September 11,2014 VII-9 Staff Reports 2 of 3 BAKER I DONELSON 920 MASSACHUSETTS AVE,N.W. SUITE 900 BEARMAN,CALDWELL Sc BERKOWITZ, PC WASHINGTON,O.C.20001 PHONE: 202.508.3425 FAX: 202.222.2225 EABBU1lVBAKERDC)NE1SON CON. www.bakerdonelson.com ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffrey A.Klatzkow County Attorney Collier County,Florida FROM: Ernest B.Abbott Of Counsel Baker Donelson DATE: August 26, 2014 RE: Recommendation that Collier County File a Second Appeal of FEMA's Disallowance of Reimbursement of Beach Restoration Costs This memorandum summarizes my recommendation that Collier County file a"Second Appeal" from FEMA's First Appeal Decision of August 1,2014 denying reimbursement of$9.2 million of the cost incurred by Collier County to restore its engineered beaches after Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. The First Appeal did restore funding of$1.8 million of eligible soft costs(such as engineering,survey,and dune repair). Note that,pursuant to FEMA's regulation governing appeals submission,if the County accepts my recommendation to file a Second Appeal,this complete package will need to be submitted to the Florida Department of Emergency Management no later than September 30. The primary rationale FEMA gave for disallowing$9.2 million was that FEMA concluded that only 136,095 cubic yards of sand had been lost from the County's beaches after Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. This was the difference between a sand survey performed in 2004(the most recent pre-Katina survey)and a sand survey performed in November 2005,and FEMA concluded that"the most reliable source of disaster related damages are the pre-and post-disaster surveys." Collier County presented evidence in the First Appeal,and will submit additional engineering evidence on Second Appeal,that the immediate post-Wilma survey had been performed before the beach had recompressed after the disaster, and there are a number of surveys performed less than 6 months after Wilma which measured 412,690 cubic yards of sand loss after Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. This additional measured sand loss accounts for$8.2 million of the disputed CAC September 11,2014 VII-9 Staff Reports 3 of 3 MEMORANDUM Collier County August 26,2014 Page 2 costs. The remainder of the amount at issue is accounted by FEMA's failure to include all of the environmental monitoring costs required as part of the beach restoration project. We believe that,on Second Appeal,Collier County has a reasonable chance of receiving significantly increased reimbursement. • FEMA Region IV appeared not to have carefully examined all of the engineering evidence provided by Collier County-and even invited the County to provide further explanation of the difference sand surveys performed. Our experience on Second Appeal is that FEMA reviews documentation submitted with far greater care. • We understand that the County plans to provide FEMA with additional engineering support, from engineers who had not been involved in the Project,demonstrating that the sand loss suffered by the County was far larger than the amount approved by FEMA. • The position taken by FEMA on the First Appeal provides no explanation as to how the survey results in November 2005 were so dramatically different than those four months later. We will demonstrate that there were no events between the two surveys that could have accounted for the difference. • The First Appeal decision's reinstatement of$1.8 million was explained as correction of a FEMA error, since the$1.8 million in costs were clearly eligible under FEMA policies. filing of an appeal should not jeopardize this recovery. • FEMA has just implemented a new Public Assistance Appeals Branch within its Headquarters office.This Branch is specifically tasked with review of FEMA's First Appeal decisions and our experience has shown that they take this responsibility very seriously. We have a good working relationship with the Branch Chief and would request an in person discussion once the Second Appeal is filed. We believe that the legal costs of preparing and filing a Second Appeal will cost less than $50,000. The amount at issue is$9.2 million. Because the potential recovery on appeal dwarfs the cost of pursuing an appeal,I would recommend that the County authorize the preparation and filing of a Second Appeal in this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Cc: Scott R.Teach,Deputy County Attorney Gary McAlpin, Director,Coastal Zone Management nr 1. 0 0 N O O O 0'.a N O. N N u)@ EO N a U Q U C71 v.r'' lL" fNI, .aaO, 1a"D, o S g g o N Oat n .",, Nn a aoai .4u1v co mares ew; m NmN m0/ CO 'V N N a'"o 1.CO amt 0 0 M CO N .N-r CO 01 N Li; m .O m an t0 O .-i N c o t. O t' a1 M ui .1 co SN CO N N m .7 N CO M N CO In N .y .D in .1 .-i CO lD y 0 .1 .1 N O N a N N N O �. y v ai N..i..—Ni. .N.. N4 N V .4 H N N V1 in.44 UT VA V! V1 V} V} U1 Vi V/V)N V1 V)VY m W 8 mm 0 0 w fo .O O 0 Q C O S in o ;a g y0 S VV N V .4 a Si., K m N E 2 0 v .. II ti,WN 0 .ail = .4 c a s -6r"a G c O _ 9 N m , W C u u a0 N b O •.i S q O u a E E LL cr E o . z 2 '0 v -o t v �SpO ~ : ° 51 8 a G 2 .D A y0 3 m O :o c7 a t m « > y w o p E i ,a V> a u o 12 .1 LL o o r Jo:95 0 L C z O '0 '0 N 1 ti L C_ C re.L a ,0 3 c 0 0 S. c'•a) v o y 4i .n u. in N N .+O+ u1 V CO al 01 C CO ut to .O N .-1 in N CO" .-N N .d} a N N O .D N 1. lD O - a1 pOppp O V u1 N tt V. .7 N p P 00 N co N ��pp CO CO .PO SO CO . CO 0 .D CO `0' %%D CO Q 00 `0 CO •0 06 01 .O ui V CO N 01 N CO comN N P N V1 m 0 ru 00 N .D 4 O1 0 00 N ..1 N u1 V N CO "" CO 01 Y .O .O CO 00 L CO • 0 •••1 N 01 N CO v N.. .-1 NA ..N N CO CO CO Cr N ., N CO nt C v N.. v N... w :D v pppyA�� V1 V1 V1 N V1 V1 V1 N Vf V)co, VT V1 V1 N V1 V1 ` 4A E V1 VI V)H .Dyy yy n 0. E .O o v E 5 '^ ` f0 M \ E N ' @ E yN ' CO V E +8m Y 3 c 2 E E n M innl 0 0 co IL ry 00 N m > " E > E E E E E E E E a o . @ " m a Q o 0 0 o 2 0 0 3 c c D r > 2 J y .-. y `. a C ... 2 0 o U 'a 'O '� 'O N A p m U1 .D P a1 .-. r4 m j0 ,� V w O N O N N a� N N N N N M M M -" .+ N N O M 4: d .1 I" m a .-. E.' D ,. .+ 1. .-N ./ v. .1 .-. .-. 01 D .-. m a1 .4 a v v . U z U . U . ,_ V x . x . . . . . 0 V z !- F a O: z z m an A a ooaa � a� �d� m 1p 1;3 dmdj0 0 m v tit$ ti t u u tS 20, 2222 io R ea m co E l m e m 2 e e e e m 2 :6. 2222 2 2000 00000 tap pp p p 000p aaaaaa aaaaaaaaa O a` .0 v N N N N V)7N N N N ri N N N N ii CD i N N N N N N N N N ii �iit= u CD - >- rr >- r E - 8 a O pp pp {{�� pp Qp CO OHOo N �O �liNO �N to,) 040tH() �n N 0co).4. V IN tONPs N' .tet ': 4:1. 0 OMM W ' NrN �c�0p s}•M _'D �OO � eO�CNryNM ti (ppp,mcgo ci C�) o v WOE /- 1!! .� VO f0D0 tO 1L1 CONW CO 1D CCpON O) U)NNQOOI N tO N000tON �00D�0 V Is. 1- CO N�� O) Q) � hNV 01". NWV vvN °0�7 m CMCJ)CONMNMOp V W a r N M ^ •- e' P. oto NNNN 106964400. NNNNNN40 N v-NNNWNNNNNN N W O 'Q 3 " v 3 fl oz o z0. a o 0 0 0 co a .. t rn 2 2 li ca a 2 = C r N M p) th .0 51 Q1 C L Nm C . —2 C1 h— C J W w0 w n m Q 11 v 1- 'o n L H 0- C 07 C N 0 Q Z a) t0 t0 oLL E C Ti; 3 m C 00 Z c0.w Www wwwW WWwwww • wwwwwwwwwa 0 0. aa000000000av0 CoaS00000000pH pRUU aaa 0a0a aaaa aaaaaaaaa 0000000000000v00000000 -Z a WO U U J F m JCL C c0ia0. dna 2oE Q Z W W W ;Q NN S tOANOU CV Q?NiA V; N +nNNP. 0CR,r)N t6 OM W O+ NG� r Met O)�p O7 BOO �Q' 0n �fQ• � a 0O x(00 co CO� NN,0 0M OO).MO0) N O�OMD OD to N N(�D4 �!> 7.0 c c g tp Qi O) NN V' Oi MIhMMQ 1� tf)RCO 1�QiOON �� Nr y th OCD tDWt� N r Mrd r LISI0 tate, 64 C 64 400.0.64 401040461044 400,46640.64406440 ' M N teot Q) O) N n n N O) O COO .p �p W fsD� VMM SOD N N M ��M M O•- O r tCO N ry CnY N tO M P.MCO ):4'11,;:1;17.40 1 z}:+r• t�n '\i O M00 t'7 N NO^i 0> 000 Of etMMNO NOOOM.- 0 .- 00 ' y ll) t(AADD 1. MT- NO O M IA OD ttpp O) N'- �m'0.w C VC? V M V000 MMMMCOM r�,rL' p+ ✓ r r r r r '- '- r �- r +r r ce > W iv. i t co w < MM MMM MMMMNrpprrNM 0rr ,' �' .- ,75 ,- ,-- ,- ..- r .- r :44.1:::: " r +}�v'. O U ?:-,-- E; T.- 1-- 0E30 615 ,56 O N N N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � �ya)5z NNNNN �V0, ` NNN`vN � �vNNN ��VNN '" x,0 > = NN n• or MOCK NN ,� 004040WMNM � Z w NM 404`0 CDhMm WT-ONT- T- N `' VM V' O (ghg f. .11 ,: l W t113 i (;'",,P14NZ '- N MVO CON- WOOMOr. WO r04e- e- NNNNN W ; _ _ 4 el q. ,,(4\ 2 v 1 naaaaaa V 't7 'O -co lo m m m m m B _a_a _ _ a_ 1? OVLm v 'O 'O m m '0 '0 V V m m q m O L)3u t t t t .5 CO CO m CO m ' t i E' m m m P:' % m m E 'Ea m .N. E EEmeee 22222 mm ilili 22202 2 m io 0 2222 22 rs4 0000000 12_ aaa0_ 000 00 '0 aaa.aa Q. CL an. D. CL an. II es U) N U) V) U) ) N N N V/ U) U) U) U) U) U) (O U) U) (0 U) U) U) Ul V U) N 0 U) N r } i } irY D.D. rID CD }D. >i } } i rD. i i r r CD � } � t0, 4114 op U) upNp 0 D I.N N CD ^ N 0D.... h to to 000010 ,--u) 0000p tD W ID (ZZ NNOp ah0pp N �v�..7 e0a40If (04 v- CD 010tv d to TTI 0...Cs fsN OpDD.- (0O 04 <- EO 00CD V V, 't NQ 0 01 . CO N \ �) R to ~' t) N' O iC)�MOOpN P01 NWS er nNtp coMOOO C? 00 N 0 yr to qg3 �Op co 0lei in mr Qui 00n ►`, . Q, QD0 OM NO!CV V.N P. s M MMM.- M r" GO 1 . s" MN V' N f� .- 0 to tD O) V'U)Oa Nh<3 .- N 10 N r to M1Dm cif - ` , aM e- in e-e- e- in CR A N N co t0D st CO N CO ', .- N N M ti tD LL to co Vi V)Vi V)V►H 69 VD Vl to V)M di 69 V)N 69 N 69 V! 69 V!69 V►V)Vt 69 69 Vi 69 69 Vi 49 N N V)V!VC 40 ;? N 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 o E in to 0 - 4 3 o co el in a a v a a = $ t e- e- e• .- e- r' •' 0 in 1n in cn al 2 - E I h a a a a a a a IX o v O O O 0 O Or O—c W C �N 0. d co co m m a O a ,... a O 0 V c CL in to m m m tt) C C C pp m U V it) co C m 2 ' 2 v 'o o: rnrn� nt0vo 0 QQ4 v �i �iv� Etin 141 C c e' $2dc E c cccccc l c c c c m �/, II W W W W W W CO suri m rnii to ll m m m w m mmH Ho a 1D 27toto E EEE Eco Qcr ¢ OD m m m m mE E m "' ,a"' Q Q 15 Q Q '0. . c CO v E ititncnm LLL �' m LiEi UUBU ig CO Q °' www 0. 0. 0. 22 a c ucit c 0) c 0 0 w 3 0 . F `$?• N• ph0ppccV,t6NO U?O W n0 srd: Q? 0in co 0 N0 t?p0000 �rpCOD, � 000 M 3 zii 6tDOe- � � N 0csi 0se MNO 0))((0 ' *0 end toOl '00000) tnt�p 0t(QQ (0 > � pOp N M N a u)N a a t) co 00 0) sMt co,..N t.OO M ..4._N le a N 0 g S 2 "N OD fh Mia NcO Qi�� to P'-N NO r` (N �- fn N� Mco co,N. a N 0 tp e- c) 69 fo fo d!49 V)V> le V►Vi d►fA 69 di V) fA H V) fil fo V)69 49 4#)tf! W V)H 69 N Vl 0 C qp tAN es CD 0 C 00/0, P. et (0 U) CD- M 0-CD tDM0vt1.0 CD0,t, CV 0) N ip to _N N M r-- a ON CO(N h h OD N- , O 0) COQ) NM 00 .- NM e- NM NNNNN es e-NMa • N ea4" I. COW OD DO O OD a ' a ' a CO CO CO CO � N. O 22222 cc) co ,-- Li.Li LLLLLL m UJ M ' ain ca. a _M _M ..4- et MMMM ' Tc-) OO M " M ' aa ' M .1. " ' ,p me 1.14°' Z0 0 4 0 O 0 0 0 0 8 N N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 .= ii NNNNNN NNNNN 0) O c0 NNN NNNNN NN NNNN 2 NORM ' OM � U) ` Mr- GOa t- OS1nM CD 2 F- N O ; N N N 1- .- ' - - N NNN N a z N N a C N (.� *e- � e'- C� V) CB � � •- � N .- e- 0, aNM' U) NM ' O c c --CIC . CO• co «5 r co 0) ON M Ty u) 0P. 00 01 0 N M ' to t0 0- OD 0) O N M O NNN NNM MM MMM MMM M " " " ' et. a ' U) 1N to U) n 1 U _ _ , _ r.. i •,Lli i • . c e. ii= == 2_2 32 1 p �N � mmd�2��88j 0o tt _ == ti ti ti t3 t 15 m@ m E@ l'..' E E Ea E m m g m R dd E2' Eee EPEE 20000eeoee oto Eo 66 0 '00 0006 aezn. a` aa as aaaet. aaa 2 0. a 00 000 0000 000000 zzzzzzzzza"Em ce �p �Gpp pp Y popp r Gp .p N 0 7i5O OF; MSOM IM.. h GOON V GMQ 010820 (J V p O)G0O 23 Pv6 0: W �NQQ n Q/N9 M F- _¢ rnui cm 4,0 ,-en O 0 co. n �o0) co 6Ah O (10„V.1--.N..0.. Oj0„VV.1--.N.0 67i�GOaN- a ) W W Mph ..-- Gp OM 6-0404a co —N O O N W0 N rRN. ID N'"0'tp N C r e- V _ 8 S w .. FIn Q I o m W 0 c*10 6A 10 i9 to 69 64 69 69 G9 69 10 69 10 69 69 10 69 10 N C4 69.63 6A 61 10 10 10 10 fA N N 22 A a Iei h m W W 0 Min n-UDr nt� V- a m <IM d r n m ,ni M aOr-nNn- tD00M .0 a iCO o 4- CA4va�ali )i u223 a a Q C 9 0 2 0 A C NQ N N N Nc�N N N N m C Wm 0 ° w F o X§§§§258885 i s Z Cl) C S C N N N N N N N N N 0 C JCJ. W ° w 4 p m F- n FQ-Z e w C4" - o0 E g CO A 9 VC W W w w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w w W W W i2 I Z C ats ata 0000 05 05 0.6 a0 00 a0 07 00 00 05C 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 O Cda aaa 2222 222222 °aaaoaaaaaa 200 000 0000 000000 2000000000 .. > 3 9 oz 60 0 W; U, . V. J 41. o c� a cU)z Z W 0 - , Z Oh MSO IpaM�pt, r— NOO N Gn G�pn )676.NNt0. 1n O GON ui d t01 , •.x M�6�{{ .�t- OSMS MN GOC,M0 C4 nn-go 0v. 0) ' U) O tD)D GDW GUMOMO) N Mn-COWv)N NGD U) 0> MT NO D7N 6[Y(00 CDD MMY N �W C) W ��W 0 n 1010 (003.(0 69691069 10!969696969 64 64 64 6469 64 6469 69 46 MN 44)0) 0) Nn t Nat G0A IC) 0)O [� N V GOA V' � � OV' Mtf) fD� NM_ NU MGept CO', M '0 00 (CpO (0 10000 0000 6W W C MM MMM MMMM NN _N NNM 0 '- e- �.. .. ._ .- 1- m- r 0 0 0 0 O r y V d N N NNN NNN N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N IDO O NN r- wi .,- M0C0 21010101020 - 0) IDNNIpMNM az z Nf� < °in G'jC 1� 0a CD .- 0N , P n- n- n..- Y ah01 UJ W O rN M.0I0 WN W M OrNM9- 0 tO � M0NNNNN Z W 3) t1------**---.-: 4 a15 naa n15 '818$>'8 i a a o 88 -8 18� 113 18 �V8 8 8 '8 '9 '0 '8 gd � 2 emmm o oQo gS ` 15ev mm O o o 15 co o w , S oe ! ppppppp aaaaabba if. aaacr. as an.aa a. 0 . . . 0 . . 0 . 000 000 00 . 0 . 0 0 00 . 0 0 z z z z z z z zzzzz z z z zzzzz z z z z z z z ��pp qp p pO to pp pp ^. d c VW.'O OON $$C�D N �V'N )w. V60,03 .s�pp7�a VO,0 a�,pp NM{ipp CD CO GO CO CPP CCCO ti 01 wJ ► V C COD N O co O CP 0(0 CDNN W n,W0 P.CO CI p CO K) COs Ps �Csgog W N a O N V' )C) 01 c0 e Cr)CD.O e-co t� O O� CC m hOtgM..E. 10 0)0 N r O N U) 0. VQ' `. N N G C M ck V) ,- •- N N OI N di 69 69 V/VI VI N N VI 69 VI VI N O N 444 .44440N 6161 OW 6*444444* N N 19 VP V�oovttpDMM 0 ul� VODCO0 'a 9 0 0 0 ' i CC)M N O W� w C") O V' w ti V' J CAM t` Nt . OCpD h hC)t. M.- O NCD .N.yy� CtNNN 41 t. P.(0 OMCfl0MA co �p p 0 17, 0,4 01 A NNNNNN NNCh2 co W pt�co O COO CCDDO M01 P N O) C s. % OOpel M pO OppM ppM ppMp Cppph ppMpp ppMpp pMp � OMOt" O)�01m O ,� OPs ma CC))C)) C) O (, 56000 S 00000 OOOr" WWW coCf W W��t WWWCA ""' Gi Ct. +t "{ NNNNNN Cf4 NNNNN N NON M) Cp Y7 V�� (,,�'" v a a v _ ° y� ^I3 a a a a^��o a c 2 `m f0 0 01 Cm9C' .P c .V C Qq c : N'°'2P ccccc cccO 0-7-7 ' m o m 0 4 a to aW W W W W W Cn N h N N aEEEEE CCZ Z y Z r t CAN aaaaa YYYY :32 65 x» El cCCC � 0UU�0U a¢ aaCO Q d •C' 0o ` ,aaa d UU d c "C0 i W W O F 4 , -- ._r r-^--,—^ . OfP OOSN 00 .�8�.pppp nrj ^�C?aN��O (OppOOOgQ �CCpO Cp0p tp0p(p0p8 a0 —• —• sONNt0N MCn �MM�CO) AA VNr N OM Ct7 GG)CON N 4 W W CG 0.- CO Cj t.. N M N'- N Nr 01 C') co.W 4 40'69 Vi VIN V/VI N V/VI 69 VI V,VI H V/VI 69 N VI VI V) N 69 V/to VI CC)CA CDCA CD NO CO �nnnm AWtD MtiOOM fI. 0) tpNaO) OO OAh W OO NWCOW CD OD .-NM VCN7 VV r4:O .-N0114*V W W n n LLg g coin LL NW _.Q 0. — — X MMvv � v MMMt") , Mvv Mov V' NY M ,p et vv �. 00 O0 CD Z3 c.:2 0 000 X0000 0 000 Z NNNNNN NgNNN NNN NNN NN NN NN NO 2 25 N �W� O � � � � N oO atM NNNN �MV � � .N- N CD04N � � .- N W CO r- � N .- CSS' NC� C�' V CfZ NM V' W ...,,,,V D ' N h W CO O N M Y. CC) WP- W 0)O N M V' CC) W P. W C) O Z NCC)w NNNNC') MMMM C') MMM M V V' V' V' V' V' V' V' V' V 4) O ) U CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 1 of 14 FY 2015/16 Local Government Funding Request Beach Management Projects Project Name(Same as previous phase): Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Project Description: (Should be consistent year to year with annual updates. Include county, location with reference to range monuments, brief project history and upcoming activities.) The Collier County Beach Renourishment Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline in Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments R-22+300 to R-30+600 (Vanderbilt Beach), R-43+500 to R-54+400 (Park Shore) and R-58A-408 to R-79 (Naples Beach). Approximately 8,356 feet of the Vanderbilt Beach segment within the project area have been designated as critically eroded. Approximately 9,972 feet within the Park Shore project area have been designated as Critically Eroded by the FDEP. The entire Naples project area (19,340 feet) has been designated as critically eroded. The Collier County shoreline was nourished in 1995/1996 with approximately 1.2 million cubic yards and again in 2006, using approximately 665,000 cubic yards of hydraulic fill. The Collier County 2013-2014 Hot Spot and Tropical Storm Fay Beach Renourishment Project was constructed between October 14, 2013 and January 29, 2014 using sand from an upland sand source. The 2013/14 design volume takes into account the impacts incurred from Tropical Storm Fay. Approximately 165,000 cubic yards were funded by FEMA for impacts suffered by Tropical Storm Fay. The total quantity was 317,000 tons (approximately 212,000 cy) of sand, supplemented with 44,000 cy dredged from Doctors Pass for the Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples reaches. Pelican Bay is a privately owned and managed beach area which is constructed by Collier County on a reimbursable basis by Pelican Bay. The County's goal is to nourish their beaches annually, but will plan for nourishments as 3-year cycles, focusing on one reach (Naples, Park Shore or Vanderbilt Beach) during each year. Truck haul projects are cheaper than dredging for Collier County and placing an average of 50,000 cubic yards annually will reduce impacts to traffic,tourists and local businesses. A truck haul project within the Naples segment is anticipated for the fall of 2014. An anticipated 53,000 cubic yards of material will be placed from an upland sand source. This nourishment project qualified for T.S. Debby FEMA funding. Subsequent truck haul projects of approximately 50,000 cubic yards are planned to occur annually with one reach being constructed during each construction year. The first cycle will combine three small nourishments starting with the FEMA restoration project. This application includes annual physical and biological monitoring for the nearshore hardbottom for the 2013/2014 Collier Beach Renourishment. Biological monitoring includes sea turtle nesting, tilling and nearshore hardbottom. The application also includes request for funds associated with the new Collier County permit application and a request for reimbursement of funds from the 2014/2015 restoration project and 2015/16 renourishment project or approval for use of the remaining funds allocated in 2014/2015. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 2 of 14 BAREFOOT BEACH A r V WIGGINS PASS ' TALLAHASSEE JACKSONVILLE DELNOR-WICGIN - 'bj ��+Jj PROJECT ORLANDOSTATE PARK :R•' N.T.S. LOCATION�.�TAMPA • ATLANTIC • OCEAN HENDRY CO.NN`.\ 0 BOLA LEE O RATON VANDERBILT co. c MIAMI N roolao VANDERBILT S BEACH 0°7'z,� m /GULF s e- �— �lyP /� OF s MEXICO scs,\s sft39.5 .• R . GULF MONROE CO. OF w sass MEXICO a Gy�s, PELICAN PELICAN P BAY ( BAY 3 4 PARK --\ Roo SHORE \ CLAM PASS lii PERMITTED SR 896 PIPELINE N 68000 CORRIDOR Gy' N8800 a0 a G' 0 c 0 ,t um -'�---- _----___-----d�'__ = PARK SHORE III OOCT.'S PASS all 1111111.111S \ Olik, r DOCTORS PASS 20' CONTOUR �' ', NAVIGATION PROJECT 4 NAPLES SR 856 NAPLES �;, " N 666000 l 111 0 N 6600 A/ ass a0 a SR 84 R_ LEGEND: ''° ' \ PERMITTED PIPELINE CORRIDOR PROJECT LIMITS -I.. V//A FINER SAND REACHES En PROPOSED NEARSHORE GULF OPERATIONAL AREAS OF M ® PERMITTED OFFSHORE \ OPERATIONAL AREAS MEXICO A R70 FDEP MONUMENTS 1 c"',T ROYAL NOTES: GORDON PASS 0 1, COORDINATES ARE IN FEET BASED ON FLORIDA STATE .. \ PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE,NORTH AMERICAN § ` 4�I �°00\\ DATUM OF 1983(NAD83). 4 C g '""�� 2. FILL WIDTHS ARE NOT TO SCALE. w q I, ,,c�, a GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT Figure 1. Location Map Use of Requested Program Funds: Funds requested for FY15/16 will be used for physical and environmental monitoring and for construction of the 2014-2015 Naples restoration project and the 2015-2016 project. The application also includes a request for funds associated with the Collier County new permit application and a request for reimbursement of funds from the 2014- CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 3 of 14 2015 renourishment project or approval for use of the remaining funds allocated in FYI4/15. Monitoring costs are shown separate from construction costs for clarity in the budget. Local Government Contact Name Title Email Gary McAlpin Manager, Coastal Zone Management GaryMcAlpin@colliergov.net Clint Perryman Project Manager, Coastal Zone ClintonPerryman@colliergov.net Management Address 1: 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Phone: 239-252-2966 Address 2: Naples, FL 34104 Fax: 239-252-2950 Mapping- Maps area provided as attachments. Maps should be to scale at a minimum of 1"=200' The Enclosed Mapping elements include: ❑ Project Boundary with Critically Eroded Shoreline ❑ Range Monuments ❑ Beach Access and Parking- Primary and Secondary, including access widths ❑ Public Lodging Establishments- locations and length of property boundaries along project shoreline or street frontage ❑ Comprehensive Plan/Current Land Use designations of Commercial and Recreational Facilities and associated property boundaries along the project shoreline Interactive zoning maps for Collier County may be found at: http://www.colliergov.net/ftp/GraphicApps/Maps/Collier County Base map.htm In addition, zoning maps from the City of Naples and from the City of Marco Island are available at:http//www.cit ofmarcoisland c.n3/index as.}2x?page_-_l 18 and http://gis.naplesgov.com/mapsandapps/ Zoning and land use data from the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island has been obtained from the Collier County GIS departments in 2012 and has been incorporated into the parking, access, land use,and zoning maps provided in Attachment 1 with this submittal. Length of Project Boundary in Feet(total restored length) 39,134ft. Eligibility: Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments: See Attachment 1 for detailed listing and maps. Cost Sharing Summary Project Distance(ft) Total Eligible Shoreline Length(ft) Commercial, Reach Recreational& Within the Critically Eroded Area Public Lodging Vanderbilt 8,356 7,603 2,656 Park Shore 11, 6,020 1,121 Naples 19,340 18,410 2,220 Sub Total 32,033 5,997 Total Project Length 39,134 ft Eligible Shoreline 81.85% 15.32% State Cost Share% * 40.93% CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 4 of 14 Licenses for the hotels are listed in Attachment 2 Schedule and Budget: (Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for 5 years) Year Proposed Description Total Estimated Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost Method Cost Share Share Share - Monitoring Phys,Biological,Turtles, $370,000 $144,375 $72,742 $152,884 Birds 2014/ Design Prepare 15 yr.Permit $47,342 $0 $15,263 $32,079 Application 2015* TS Debby Nourishment& Construction $1,627,857 $1,424,375 $65,603 $137,880 Constr.Serv. Design Prepare P&S. $144,885 $0 $46,711 $98,174 Phys,Biological,Turtles, Monitoring $377,400 $0 $154,460 $222,940 !, Birds 2015/ Nourishment& 2016 Construction Constr.Serv. $3,193,565 $0 $1,307,041 $1,886,524 Design Process Permit $77,680 $0 $31,792 $45,888 2016/ Phys,Biological,Turtles, 2017 Monitoring Birds $384,948 $0 $157,549 $227,399 - Monitoring Phys,Turtles,Birds $205,000 $0 $83,901 $121,099 2017/ Nourishment& 2018 Construction Constr.Serv. $5,033,880 $0 $2,060,233 $2,973,648 Design Prepare P&S $154,798 $0 $63,355 $91,444 2018/ Monitoring Phys,Turtles,Birds $209,100 $0 $85,579 $123,521 II 2019 2019/ Monitoring Phys,Turtles,Birds $213,282 $0 $87,291 $125,991 2020 Monitoring Phys,Turtles,Birds 2020/ 2021 Construction Nourishment& Constr.Serv. Design Prepare P&S 2021/ 2022 Monitoring Phys,Turtles,Birds 2022/ 2023 Monitoring Phys,Turtles,Birds Monitoring Phys,Biological,Turtles 2023/ Nourishment&Constr. 2024 Construction Serv. Design Prepare P&S 1 2024/ 2025 Monitoring Phys,Turtles,Birds *FEMA truck haul project is anticipated to occur in 2014/2015. Funds for this project are being requested from the state along with the 2015/2016 renourishment project funds or approval for use of the remaining funds allocated in 2014/2015. **Monitoring and construction costs are shown separately for clarity. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 5 of 14 Severity of erosion: Criterion will be calculated by the Department. Please provide narrative and any data that should be considered in addition to the Department's database. The Department provided the following assessment for the severity of erosion criterion in the 2014-2015 LGFR Project Assessment: "Using the historical MHW data, the average rate of erosion for the project shoreline is -0.54 foot/year. The MHW data from 1972 to 11/1995, 4/1996 and 1/1996 corresponding to the above 3 beach segments of the project were used. Hence, the ranking score for severity of erosion is 1.1 points." Threat to Upland Structures Criterion will be calculated by the Department. Please provide narrative and any data that should be considered in addition to the Department's database. Given that the Park Shore segment has been designated by the Department as critically eroded (Attachment 3), we request that the threat to upland structures calculation be calculated with the updated project length. The Applicant requests that the calculations and data used for determining the Threat to Upland Structures criterion be submitted to the Applicant. Recreational and Economic Benefit: The percentage of linear footage of properties within the project boundaries zoned commercial, recreational, or Public Lodging Establishment, or the equivalent, in the current local government land use map 15.32% Length of project zoned commercial,recreational or public lodging establishment=5,997 ft Length of project boundary=39,134 ft Availability of Federal Funds: Is the project Federally authorized by WRDA? No Provide date of authorization expiration. Does this project phase have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement,or similar for the current phase? Provide a copy of the document. No Federal cost share percentage available for this project: NA Is this project funded through FEMA for storm repairs? Yes Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and Naples have FEMA Category G funds due to damage as a result of Tropical Storm Fay, which was applied to the 2013-2014 project. Additionally, Collier County qualifies for FEMA funding for T.S. Debby in Naples, which have impacted the shoreline in previous years. Approximately 53,000 cy will be placed as part of the 2014-2015 project. A copy of the signed Project Worksheet is included with this application as Attachment 4. Local Sponsor Financial and Administrative Commitment Is funding for the project in the local sponsor's 10-year comprehensive financial plan? Yes Please provide copy or web link to the plan. http://www.colliergov.net/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=5181 1 CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 6 of 14 A copy of the 10-year financial plan is included as Attachment 5 of this document. Is funding provided through a source established by referendum? Yes Please provide a copy or web link to the referendum. A copy of the referendum that established the Collier County Tourist Development Tax is included with this application as Attachment 6. Is funding provided by a third party? No What is the percentage of total project costs provide by the third party? NA Please provide a copy of the cost sharing agreement. Quarterly Report Compliance: 12C01: contract expires on 12/31/15 Quarter ending in Sept 2013: sent on 10-9-13 (2013 quarter 3) Quarter ending in Dec 2013: sent on 1-9-14(2013 quarter 4) Quarter ending in March 2014: sent on 4-3-14(2014 quarter 1) Quarter ending in June 2014: sent on 7-10-14(2014 quarter 2) Are there active federal and state permits for the project? Yes FDEP Permit Number: 0222355-012-JN (Permit Mod—July 26, 2013) USACE Permit Number: SAJ-2003-12405(MOD-KDS) (Aug 16, 2013) Have local funds been secured for the project? Yes Explain: Local funding for the project will be obtained by Collier County through a Tourist Development Tax. This provides a dedicated long term funding source through a 'bed tax'. Collier County levies a four(4%) percent Tourist Development Tax on all rental income received from accommodations rented for six months or less. This is split between the beaches and tourist advertising. In order to acquire state funding, a resolution from the local sponsor must be provided by the application deadline which declares: • Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project • Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor • Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share • And the source of the funding Please provide copy of the resolution. The resolution is attached to this application as Attachment 7. An updated resolution is forthcoming on return of the Board of County Commissioners from their summer break. Previous State Commitment: Has the Department previously cost shared, reviewed,and approved a feasibility or design phase for this project? Yes Previous State Cost Share percentage 32.24% CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 7 of 14 Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously-constructed project?How? No Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline? (Full beach nourishment. Dune-only projects do not qualify.) Yes Project Performance: Nourishment Interval (Years): 8 years Mitigation of Inlet Effects: Criterion is calculated by the Department. Please provide any supplemental information that may assist in determining if the project is located within the area of inlet influence and provides supplemental nourishment for an inlet that is not balancing its sediment budget as defined by the Inlet Management Plan or Strategic Beach Management Plan. The 1997 department adopted inlet management plan specified that all dredged material be placed on the beaches or inshore zone south of the inlet meeting a minimum bypassing goal of 10,000 cubic yards on an average annual basis. The following projects have been constructed since that time: • 2005: 44,000 cubic yards placed between R-60 and R-62 • 2009: 33,000 cubic yards placed between R-60 and R-62 • 2013: 44,000 cubic yards placed between R-58a and R-59 The volume of inlet sand bypassing during the 17 years (1999 to 2014) since adoption of the bypassing objective has been approximately 7,118 cubic yards per year. The bypassing was supplemented with nourishment in 2006, 2010, 2011, and 2013. In 2013, at least 19,900 cubic yards of sand was placed through truck haul between R-58A and R-54 to supplement bypassing. Use of Innovative Applications of existing technologies: Does the project address erosion in a method that is economically competitive with nourishment, that will not adversely affect the conservation of fish and wildlife, including endangered or threatened species, or their habitats, and that is designed to demonstrate an innovative application of existing technologies? The project has been modified to utilize the sand from Doctors Pass with placement adjacent to the inlet. This will assist in addressing future inlet related impacts in this region. To this end, the applicant has secured both beach and inlet permit modifications and has produced an updated biological monitoring plan based on the placement of fill adjacent to the inlet. When dredging prices became very high earlier this year, the County switched to an upland sand source,which saved approximately 40%compared to the dredger's bid. Has the project been documented to be effective and demonstrated technologies previously untried in the state? No innovative technology is proposed. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 8 of 14 Regionalization: Is this project being planned or constructed in cooperation with another local government to reduce contracting costs? Explain and attach a signed copy of the interlocal agreement between the two local sponsors. N/A Significance: What is the volume of advanced nourishment lost since the last sand placement event of a beach restoration or nourishment project as measured landward of the Mean High Water Line? Prior to the most recent, 2013/2014 placement,the last placement event along Collier County occurred between February and May 2006. Based on surveys between November 2005 (pre-construction) and May 2006 (post-construction) the beach nourishment project, prior to the 2013 placement, added 431,406 cy of material above the MHW line within the project area(R-22 to R-79). Comparing the May 2006(post-construction)survey with the 2013 survey,the project area(R-23 to R79)has lost 189,221 cy of material above the MHW line. The ratio of lost to placed is 43.86% Has the project eroded into the design template? Yes The project has eroded into the design template as of 2012 at the following profiles: R-25 to R- 29, R-44 to R-46, R-52, R-58A to R-58, R-62 to R-64, R-76, R-78. The post-construction 2013- 2014 project showed a few violations of the template at R-44, R-48 and R-49. What is the proposed placement volume? Approximately 212,000 cubic yards were placed as part of the 2013/14 renourishment. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 9 of 14 ATTACHMENT 1 Basis for Local Funding and Project Maps CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 10 of 14 ATTACHMENT 1 FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT Vanderbilt Beach Project Boundary: Vanderbilt Beach: 300 ft. south of R-22 to 600 ft. south of R-30 Pelican Bay: 500 ft. south of R-30 to R-37(this reach is not part of the County project, but it is being added at the Pelican Bay Association's request at 100%of their cost.) Approximate Shoreline Length: 8,356 ft. The approximate shoreline length that is designated as critically eroded is 8,390 ft. On-site Adjacent Total Public Access Spaces Spaces Spaces Delnor Wiggins State Recreation Area* 355 0 355 Vanderbilt Beach Road* 340 21 361 Qualifying Hotels Qualifying Shoreline Vanderbilt Shorest 550 ft. Bayshoresl' 297 ft. La Playa 360 ft. Vanderbilt Beach—Beach Cottages' 100 ft. Vanderbilt Beach Resort's 100 ft. Ritz Carltont 741 ft. Naples Trolley tours runs year-round in Collier County. The location of trolley stops is included with the project area maps in this application. The trolley stops at one hotel in the Vanderbilt Beach area(LaPlaya)which qualifies for 52.8 ft of eligibility each. The County has eight (8) public walkways between Delnor Wiggins State Park and Vanderbilt Beach Road, each with a bike rack. Walkways three (3) to six (6) listed below each have a four (4)station bike rack and fill in gaps not covered by parking&access or hotels. Vanderbilt Beach Public Walkways Walkway No. l @ R-29-340'with one four(4)station bike rack Walkway No. 2 @ R-27+200(Seachase) with one four(4)station bike rack Walkway No. 3 @ R-26(LaPlaya)with one four(4)station bike rack Walkway No. 4 @ R-26-200'(Bayview)with one four(4)station bike rack Walkway No. 5 @ R-25+400 with one four(4)station bike rack Walkway No. 6 @ R-25 (Seabreeze)with one four(4)station bike rack Walkway No. 7 @ R-24 with one four(4) station bike rack Walkway No. 8 @ R-22+313 (DWSP)with one four(4) station bike rack Area determined to be publicly accessible within critically eroded areas Total Length Vanderbilt Beach Segment 7,603 ft. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 11 of 14 Area determined to be critically eroded and accessible R-22.3 to R-30.6 Percent eligible for State funding: 90.99% State eligibility incorporates the total project length(critical and non-critical)and eligibility only recognizes publicly accessible critically eroded shoreline. *Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms. tOverlap CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 12 of 14 FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT Park Shore Project Boundary: R-43 +500 to R-54+400 Approximate Shoreline Length: 11,438 ft. Approximately 6,020 ft of the project area is located within the FDEP critical erosion area On-site Parking Spaces Adjacent Total Public Access Metered Permit* Spaces Spaces Horizon Way 21 17 0 38 Vedado Way 25 14 6 39 Via Miramar 29 12 0 41 Seagate Drive(within .25 mile) 0 0 38 38 Clam Pass Park** 0 172 0 172 Naples Trolley tours runs year-round in Collier County. The location of trolley stops is included with the project area maps in this application. Area determined to be critically eroded R-45 to R-47.5 9,972 ft Total eligible shoreline length within critically eroded areas: 6,020 ft. Approximate Shoreline Length: 11,438 ft. Percent eligible for State funding: 52.6% State eligibility incorporates the total project length(critical and non-critical) and eligibility only recognizes publicly accessible critically eroded shoreline. *Permit spaces are available to residents and the general public for the same price. **Clam Pass Park is a primary beach access. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 13 of 14 FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT Naples Segment Project Boundary: 1,050 ft. north of R-58 to R-79 Shoreline Length: 19,340 ft. The entire Naples Segment(19,340 ft.) is designated as critically eroded. On-site Spaces Adjacent Spaces Total Public Access Public Permit** Public Permit** Spaces Lowdermilk Park* 46 164 0 0 210 8`h Avenue North 20 1 0 0 1, 7'h Avenue North 10 4 0 0 14 North Lake Avenue 19 20 0 0 39 Fill 6`h Avenue North 5 5 0 0 10 5th Avenue North 0 0 0 0 0 4th Avenue North 11 4 0 0 15 3rd Avenue North 10 4 0 0 14 2"d Avenue North 12 4 0 0 16 1st Avenue North 11 6 0 0 17 Central Drive 8 4 0 0 12 1'Avenue South 5 12 0 0 17 2Avenue South 7 4 0 0 11 rd 3Avenue South 8 6 0 0 14 4t'Avenue South : 8 7. 0 0 15 5th Avenue South 34 0 20 0 54 6f Avenue South 4 8:' 0 0 12 7th z.Avenue South 7 9 0 0 16 8th Avenue South 6 5 0 0 11 9Ih Avenue South 11 4 0 0 15 Fill 10th Avenue South 9 35 0 0 44 11`h Avenue South 8 5 0 0 13 Broad Avenue 49 22 0 0 71 12`h Avenue South 25 8 0 0 33 Pier Parking Lot 81 0 0 0 81 13th Avenue South 31 13 0 0 44 14`h Avenue South 16 14 0 0 30 15th Avenue South 10 7 0 0 17 16th Avenue South 16 14 0 0 30 17th Avenue South 7 3 0 0 10 18th Avenue South 12 13 0 0 25 19th Avenue South 0 0 0 0 0 21st Avenue South 0 0 0 21 21 *Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms **Permit spaces are available to residents and the general public for the same price Naples Trolley tours runs year-round in Collier County.The location of trolley stops is included with the project area maps in this application. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 14 of 14 Qualifying Hotels Qualifying Shoreline Edgewater Hotel 333 ft. Naples Golf and Beach Club 939 ft. Area determined to be publicly accessible Total Length 85 ft. north of R-58 to R-79 18,410 ft. Area determined to be critically eroded 85 ft. north of R-58 to R-79 Total eligible shoreline length within critically eroded areas: 18,410 ft. Total shoreline length: 19,340 ft. Percent eligible for State funding: 95.20% State eligibility incorporates the total project length(critical and non-critical)and eligibility only recognizes publicly accessible critically eroded shoreline. *Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 1 of 48 FY 2015/16 Local Government Funding Request Beach Management Projects Project Name(Same as previous phase): South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project Description: (Should be consistent year to year with annual updates. Include county, location with reference to range monuments, brief project history and upcoming activities.) This project includes yearly physical beach monitoring, beach tilling, turtle and shorebird monitoring. All the monitoring activities are required by the FDEP and USACE permits. Additionally, a Tropical Storm Debby restoration project is scheduled for 2015, pending additional discussions with FEMA. The South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline of Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments R-143 and beyond R-148 to the terminal groin. The project's borrow area is the 1997/2007/2013 Caxambas Pass Borrow Area. A supplemental borrow area is the Cape Romano Shoal. Collier County placed approximately 77,800 cubic yards of beach compatible material in 2013 to restore approximately 2,300 feet along South Marco Island(400 feet south of R-146 to G-4). The beach fill was within the 2005 permitted project limits. The main goals of the project were to restore storm protection, natural resource habitats, and recreational beach areas to offset the storm damage caused by Tropical Storm Fay in 2008. Additionally, the structural repair of five existing erosion control structures was completed in 2013/14. It is anticipated that the South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project will be nourished with approximately 16,000 cubic yards of beach compatible material to offset storm damage caused by Tropical Storm Debby. Construction is anticipated for 2015 and may span both FY2014/2015 and FY2015/2016. Use of Requested Program Funds: Funds requested for FY15/16 will be used for environmental and physical monitoring of the 2012/2013 renourishment project as required by permits and for design, construction and construction services of the Tropical Storm Debby Beach Restoration project on South Marco Island. Local Government Contact Name Title Email Gary McAlpin Manager, Coastal Zone GaryMcAlpin@colliergov.net Management Clint Perryman Project Manager, Coastal Zone ClintonPerryman@colliergov.net Management Address 1: 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Phone: 239-252-2966 Address 2: Naples, FL 34104 Fax: 239-252-2950 Mapping- Maps are provided as attachments. Maps should be to scale at a minimum of 1"=200' Enclosed mapping elements include: ❑Project Boundary with Critically Eroded Shoreline ❑ Range Monuments CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 2 of 48 o Beach Access and Parking-Primary and Secondary, including access widths. o Public Lodging Establishments- locations and length of property boundaries along project shoreline or street frontage. o Comprehensive Plan/Current Land Use designations of Commercial and Recreational Facilities and associated property boundaries along the project shoreline. Interactive zoning maps for Collier County may be found at: http://www.colliergov.net/ftp/GraphicApps/Maps/Collier County Base map.htm In addition, zoning maps from the City of Naples and from the City of Marco Island are available at: http://www.cityofmarcoisland.com/index.aspx?page--1 18 and http://gis.naplesgov.com/mapsa ndappsi Zoning and land use data from Collier County has been obtained from the GIS departments and has been incorporated into the parking, access, land use, and zoning maps provided in Attachment 1 with this submittal. Length of Project Boundary in Feet(total restored length) 2,681 feet Eligibility: Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments: Location/Name Address R- Type of Width of Total No. units Eligible Mon Access Access/ units available to shoreline Frontage(ft) Public (ft) Swallow Cape Marco R-148 Secondary 20 72 72 2,450 Avenue Drive Access Belize at Cape 970 Cape R-148 Lodging 148 148 Marco Marco Drive Cozumel at 960 Cape R-148 Lodging 120 120 Cape Marco Marco Drive Merida at Cape 990 Cape R-148 Lodging 90 90 Marco Marco Drive Monterrey at 980 Cape R-148 Lodging 1,640 136 136 1,640 Cape Marco Marco Drive Tampico at 930 Cape R-148 Lodging 66 66 Cape Marco Marco Drive Veracruz at 940 Cape R-148 Lodging 123 123 Cape Marco Marco Drive Proof of licensure and unit information is included with this application as Attachment 2. The Cape Marco Properties is inclusive of all of the condominium properties in the above table and was not fully considered in previous years in calculating the state eligible shoreline length. Critically Eroded Length: 2,436 feet Eligible Shoreline Length: 2,436 feet(90.85%) CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 3 of 48 Schedule and Budget: (Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for 5 years.) Year Proposed Method Description Total Federal State Cost Local Cost Estimated Cost Cost Share Share Share Construction and Tropical Storm Debby $613,904 $161,194 $205,649 $247,061 2015/2016 Services Restoration Project Monitoring Phys,Turtle $81,600 $0 $37,068 $44,532 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $83,232 $0 $37,809 $45,423 2016/2017 Design Eng Report&NEPA $90,000 $0 $40,884 $49,116 2017/2018 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $84,897 $0 $38,565 $46,331 Design P&S and Pre-Con $50,000 $0 $22,713 $27,287 2018/2019 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $86,595 $0 $39,337 $47,258 Construction Renourishment $1,230,107 $0 $558,792 $671,315 2019/2020 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $88,326 $0 $40,123 $48,203 2020/2021 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $90,093 $0 $40,926 $49,167 2021/2022 Monitoring Phys,Turtle 2022/2023 Monitoring Phys,Turtle 2023/2024 Monitoring Phys,Turtle Monitoring Phys,Turtle 2024/2025 a �, Design P&S and Pre-Con 2025/2026 Construction Renourishment Severity of erosion: Criterion will be calculated by the Department. Please provide narrative and any data that should be considered in addition to the Department's database. The project area's shoreline has been designated by FDEP as critically eroded. The Department has previously calculated the average rate of erosion for the project shoreline, based on historical MHW data from 1972 to 1990 between monuments R-146 and R-148 to be-2.1 ft/yr. Threat to Upland Structures Criterion will be calculated by the Department. Please provide narrative and any data that should be considered in addition to the Department's database. The applicant requests that the Department forward a discussion of the data used in this calculation to us. Recreational and Economic Benefit: The percentage of linear footage of properties within the project boundaries zoned commercial, recreational, or Public Lodging Establishment, or the equivalent, in the current local government land use map 55% Project Length: 2,681 feet Total Recreational, Commercial and Public Lodging: 1,470 feet CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 4 of 48 Availability of Federal Funds: Is the project Federally authorized by WRDA? No Provide date of authorization expiration. NA Does this project phase have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement, or similar for the current phase? Provide a copy of the document. No Federal cost share percentage available for this project: 75% Is this project funded through FEMA for storm repairs? Yes Provide a copy of the signed Project Worksheet. (Attachment 3) Marco Island Beach has FEMA Category G funds due to damage as a result of Tropical Storm Debby. Local Sponsor Financial and Administrative Commitment Is funding for the project in the local sponsor's 10-year comprehensive financial plan? Yes Please provide copy or web link to the plan. http://www.coll iergov.net/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=51811 A copy of the 10-year financial plan is included as Attachment 4 of this document. Is funding provided through a source established by referendum? Yes The referendum is attached to this application as Attachment 5. Is funding provided by a third party? No What is the percentage of total project costs provide by the third party? NA Please provide a copy of the cost sharing agreement. Quarterly Report Compliance: 07COI: contract expires on 12/31/14 Quarter ending in Sept 2013: sent on 10-9-13 (2013 quarter 3) Quarter ending in Dec 2013: sent on 1-9-14(2013 quarter 4) Quarter ending in March 2014: sent on 4-3-14(2014 quarter 1) Quarter ending in June 2014: sent on 7-10-14(2014 quarter 2) Are there active federal and state permits for the project? Yes FDEP Permit No. 0235209-003-JC Expiration: 10/11/2027 USACE Permit No. SAJ-2005-2726(IP-MN)and permit mod Have local funds been secured for the project? Yes Collier County has dedicated the majority of the Tourist Development Taxes to beach maintenance, including funding projects within Marco Island. The funding was approved by referendum(Attachment 5). In order to acquire state funding, a resolution from the local sponsor must be provided by the application deadline which declares: • Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project • Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor • Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share • And the source of the funding CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 5 of 48 Please provide copy of the resolution. The 2013 resolution is attached to this application as Attachment 6. An updated resolution is forthcoming on return of the Board of County Commissioners in September 2014. Previous State Commitment: Has the Department previously cost shared, reviewed, and approved a feasibility or design phase for this project? Yes Previous State Cost Share percentage 20.88% Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously-constructed project?How? Rehabilitation of the five erosion control structures increased sand retention on the island, which will increase project life. Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline? (Full beach nourishment. Dune-only projects do not qualify.) Yes Project Performance: Planned Nourishment Interval (Years): 6 years Cost Per Mile: =1,518,738 $/mile South Marco Bid(2-14-13) Total Cost= 770,000 Total Volume=77,000 cy ,Project Length=2,681 feet(0.507 miles) Mitigation of Inlet Effects: Criterion is calculated by the Department. Please provide any supplemental information that may assist in determining if the project is located with the area of inlet influence and provides supplemental nourishment for an inlet that is not balancing its sediment budget as defined by the Inlet Management Plan or Strategic Beach Management Plan. The Marco Island project is nourished in synergy with maintaining Caxambas Pass for navigation. This practice meets the objective of the Strategic Beach Management Plan and returns sand eroded from the beach back to the beach for a high level of sustainability. Use of Innovative Applications of existing technologies: Does the project address erosion in a method that is economically competitive with nourishment, that will not adversely affect the conservation of fish and wildlife, including endangered or threatened species, or their habitats, and that is designed to demonstrate an innovative application of existing technologies? Improvements to the combined breakwater and groin system at the south end of the project area were conducted to control sand being lost off the south end of the island. The reconstruction of these erosion control structures will increase project life. Has the project been documented to be effective and demonstrated technologies previously untried in the state? N/A CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 6 of 48 Regionalization: Is this project being planned or constructed in cooperation with another local government to reduce contracting costs?Explain and attach a signed copy of the interlocal agreement between the two local sponsors. This is a joint Collier County and Marco Island project. Significance: Project Length: 2,681 feet Approximately 16,000 cubic yards will be placed in 2015 to replace Tropical Storm Debby losses. 55%of the shoreline is designated as commercial, recreational or public lodging establishment. The last placement event along South Marco occurred between March and April 2013. Based on surveys between October 2006 (pre-construction) and January 2007 (post-construction) the beach nourishment project, prior to the 2013 placement, added approximately 27,800 cy of material above the MHW line within the project area(R-146 to G-4). Comparing the January 2007 (post-construction) survey with the August 2012 survey, the project area(R-146 to G-4)has lost approximately 16,400 cy of material above the MHW line. This represents a loss of 58.57%of the placement volume above MHW. As noted by the FDEP in the 14/15 project assessment, this calculation is consistent with the 77,800 cubic yards of fill placement in 2013, 44% of the 2007 fill volume. The state has previously allocated 3 points for this ranking item. Has the project eroded into the design template? Yes While there is no formal design template for Marco Island, the following profiles did not maintain a 100 foot beach width for the monitoring period between 2006 and 2012: R147-R148 and G2-G4. The last 3 profiles lost an average of-5 feet beyond the 2006 pre-construction survey. What is the proposed placement volume? 77,800 cubic yards was placed as part of the 2013 nourishment. 16,000 cy will be placed in 2015 to replace Tropical Storm Debby losses and 78,000 cubic yards will be placed to renourish the project again in 2019-2020, after a 6-year interval. Volume/mile/year=77,800cy/0.507miles= I53,452cy/mile CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 7 of 48 ATTACHM ENT 1 Project Maps N 6 1. In j r '9 ion. 1 ex:.oi III ;: !II • .. moo. lt x m g D ouL1ER SOUTH Ili ": . ,,,...,,... ., , , ., . . .. .„.7',:'YZ''. ', '- - . --,.., '''''. ' .--0;:21f.;'=" '''qr. .? ., f 1 lig r-` is l 'S .... 41..) _....w____z_ r k F T. 5 R�' ( 4 - ) 0 E N ..,,,,,,',,,,.,:..:„..,,,1/4,- , . 4,,,,:- 2 t"4.:,,,,•°'''.,,o,,,, ii6-46.!Air, .0.1,,!::,,....,:,, ,,,. \,, ,,, .�� 1x ‘;',:',5 ' ' ' 1 ','Aiiiiir;Its. r} d ; aMi Iv E eat, , ,,.�,Y,. "• «�,r2� Z ,. , - s✓a ,,syr uy o NW WV m�a c m4rtiN E 72 3,Oce, c a VN U, N �" 'or� y m 2 16000 � �,ax� Hr x�ld�7� iE- c _'' s�Ys lx �. sri3 I 111 3;40 sIc ' jr$ -, 9ra', rz ,< �jf rye oNc,71 = 8 II in Ni/r as ELeU drts3 Y WsOl � s � ra oa H�: o5vco0 oaO O'Y ;PL 400000k NVU0CO w _ m�hF %p 2c m roO t dUmms¢o2� , a,daSaL N= o O«C«Da8U%7ZOd r""_ « N n wO Z wj1a: r .0m ' r3 � Fr ''x f £? ,-mx3 ; Hca i I:. ..;K.__ , W fuj W'1" iii mat{ o '" e ... rwtu� ' • .,. 0 O) ZadLL o rrr3 '` a+ J > 11 . .!.i, har ilklrj o�� „,,',',',„--4:•':',,''''''''',' ”:1 •'''1•,,,4,..'1%'" t. Ai ! wtMM W •. t'l. .at ,i ..�i lr ',M r� / LLur t , ,,i 1 . N • • c E 1 N �� U OE O < E a IL l 1LL O ,._r W it' 44 wl c `m U U u. l I I w 31 1 rn I- D c 3 m 1-416900 0009,t o E t. , _....._-.....,...,..,,..,...,, _ 2 1 U 1 m a m 1 d o t • a 1 r ri � �aj �� z O $ C., � �� ,`' kI',a� Via 3 LL h W ,"4,if r,S` L w x „� rr, via L�'y + a\ ---10-.';,‘14,-,:-;;.wt - 0E2., . . 0 3' DjZ E �� .., a� ��+a" �S---.,i,:,,..,„1 .per ... � y�_ o�.m 0 a c y m of h � ,y S �.f� t Z �i`''M 2 II'JWI � p� �g' �-5fir0'/� ' sffi4\\ , .Oo Oaa 8— H,�, `fie \ / 5�5�/ N U(2-,,-, F(0, N �j cam, ' � �� ,�� ,ptiS � z�a • ��'1 : c � d r $ o 4it - �/�� r � \ m m E QO o s v, O E 1. �';#s "" SaL� I c a o 2,y to ;.,.� 3.11....ff � / of 9 4-..-; :. N o o m c o w J yL{ 3 / 0 ' �a I w U(nZ Od W NU h w ° #`' 'kik -� z w 0 1•'`:.rrlE x} : 3 q' ,�°� ., S�~?�r�..'��> e .- , ��''��Q > � a ,d�v ,• s „f�; } s� xrsoa s�.� � !Yp. UQQ - Am y atlinki 2 717 a .., , . . .. , ii Z W_4y k z ,,. � LRYW_ WLL9 rHca ' z C0VO0mrc�„x s i m p z;oma` v�' r a Cti il i I •-„ ,4)1,--4'.'„,, , , , � a i : ( U1� 'A 33 ' „, !, ' y, : y� t} 1, la , ate* ? T` f �c 's,, _ J, k '' a . Iy' � �*rat a x i t. > _` 3 lNa 1k isc ag k # tfg i *it h �1 i A v '1 gJ.r 3` $ h $ 9 ` o ' _ 7 9 c # r Dt 'd �a if 1 i 'P <¢Rs 4 est a tai .,1r�, s � +a e � r�8 ,A k f m I I c m I B E Q c 1 I W o �1 I� a_ a aI I a - w LLI �� U OLL I 1 I 1 I c C U E' I r�159uu 000eYroy c E , I ) m U � in w 1 � E►1 i eajd}oafoad A ® y g 1 n I �� y° ff frr3P,�i3�d u�f "'1 ., ''':"..4,4.5-S ''' I d _ 1 ''';?!)'''','":14; , gsf. z s cam” 1 J _ I, `I i 1 M z O N cv N I L C W N S I 1 O N r. O I Q E U aimo 'ri �y ..1.,--:.411N11-':` ,Tv i k a ,d p,0 W o o m z , 3 �' '.,'7','J,%'11,..'''''1,7,� ` w�, 4.4iioErim� Cll `� V C1 iii O >,c - E o 'IS r f*` „41ti I a�o nm 0 tt .t s,ty;a sLy�� '� 2•E w 4 :....---'‘i: ,�+ 1 w c? Fiat-DC) u f 232± 928 . °o c . 12'21-c-,--2 §..(9 ".. y V S-' _ moc 000s IY m � y `y t_ N m m E Q O N o r '3- p I E.L o V c N`m w O. '0 1 1 ,1°),75zom ' -O N 2 c O Oa� _ 13,c� 4 �jv '131 ` _ii- -, -H 2 U> ' . vu w ui .1 4 '14 minim i„,,''.* oNsfai Q:, ° R K LLNca wr tOJ u UB nui Ykaa P tyCgLa (, U-1 a sz,. 2. sm. :' wa io It7 o�'F �. I f 'CI'"I's., :?*i''''''''''.itti ,,,3, ,t .t, C m11O3Hjj® Or 1.404‘1,1-k,� nBea„t .0,,,,,`',1 � ifit 4000:;t o �3 m� < m -1! P2 Ao � � 8 E "& cA �s E 8 w 1 V ' U U L1 V 7 .. I R 1 I of y ` Na rnfCD f6 Q LL 1 U o 1 ....0 C > -,`-1 1 N LL m 2 I ga 1 N d 1 01 *1-410000 8I. QOOSIYy reaJv paIoad l u E ! a1)i [E 1 07 N [1 a' a .o 1 1 — f ( z coO N N 5 I o coOMw N a0 0 tm Q.0 t 3 qq�� t tuba ii 2,L')''•6�n ° mow ,�'i 1 L-1 It � ` ( ,, qy�. .� 4 'm a PP ; o .$"filo f e U f0 Ei U w y -`,1-„' c N N n 11 m E¢9 N8 U ,rte/ /W O 1 a1 L yV,x N w //x „/ / X o ' W O O (0-'75 C,-7, w f,1 0) I .°), U(nZ�0_ W NU _/ U' 1 O NM *--,-/e !y x-.sz Z ____„„_.....,,g- N n ��N yi<a p U N `,�� d0 Z w E m 1I jjj� t :. U 7 ul� � ' O W U i U ui I6 C Z Q„ �' I*' a �E m E E coma„e � car z= ry a /; m e a) w° R; — 3v �r` li ', c 4) cC w z •- Z m el : co S ill x orf . 0 0)R Z&n. 0 ,� L•-2Jto Q m' L) 0tzc LE 000L 1.4- 4�, t� < d O LL My i..,4:1-4, ,,..,,„1 1 ,•, o F N O 11 � O L 3 if .., ¢g dS , $ .: o baa y II c of CU iH a Q o U IL I U O LL i a. a Y . ill ea.ld;aa{a��.. 0009L9- m _8000 N v_ 9 0 c o N , C 1 d 0 3 I O 3 p N N I oNamo ° a n a= 3 �a Ea ',',,V7'..- 2w5Em w?i.,' '' '��st� !*�ut 1 C7 cS Ifihihi Y`„! vocaacaU' ,n �p mo ....r�.` OOOS l9- 8) 28450'828 030072 (-)13 ; N It E,O o 0 0 V-. 0 � �a Q o m aU - O. 6)LY d'N `y w o C a v X o N O O l0 p O g 1) ) 0U)Z0a 030,1 U CD o N n r-' Z w 0 CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 13 of 48 ATTACHMENT 2 Hotel Licenses and Property Information DBPR - MONTERREY, A CONDO, Condominium ProjectCAC Septembe�fi 9OI4of 1 VII-12 Staff Reports 14 of 48 5:06:11 PM 7/31/2014 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: MONTERREY, A CONDO (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 980 CAPE MARCO DRIVE MARCO ISLAND Florida 33937 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Condominium Project Rank: Condo Project License Number: PR1U022727 Status: Approved,Recorded Licensure Date: 10/29/1993 Expires: 01/01/2015 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Planned Unit Development Group View Related License Information View License Complaint View Additional Information 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 32399:: Email:Customer,Contact Center:: Customer Contact Center: 850.487.1.:395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEC employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Statement Linder Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395,*Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.roust provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The emails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=2030D60707F9BE80B42... 7/31/2014 DBPR - MERIDA CONDO ASSOC INC, Managing Entity 'age 14of 1 CAC Septembe VII-12 Staff Reports 15 of 48 5:48:43 PM 7/31/2014 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: MERIDA CONDO ASSOC INC (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: PO BOX: 2397 MARCO ISLAND Florida 341462397 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Managing Entity Rank: Managing Entity License Number: MA00019919 Status: Approved Licensure Date: 01/01/1901 Expires: Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 32399:: Email: Customer Contact Center:: Customer Contact Center: 850.487.1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Statement Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone pr by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395. 'Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The ernails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 pace to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=C04A23731 F2D84B8C62... 7/31/2014 DBPR - COZUMEL CONDO ASSN INC, Managing Entitycac septemberf e 14of 1 VII-12 Staff Reports 16 of 48 4:56:59 PM 7/31/2014 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: COZUMEL CONDO ASSN INC (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 960 CAPE MARCO DRIVE MARCO ISLAND Florida 34145 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Managing Entity Rank: Managing Entity License Number: MA00021570 Status: Approved Licensure Date: 01/01/1901 Expires: Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 32399:: Email: Customer Contact Center:: Customer Contact Center: 850,487.1395 The State of Florida is en AA/EEO employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Statement Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.It you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic mad to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395. 'Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The entails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email addresses are public record,If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine it you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=5C26A6BD363597B687... 7/31/2014 DBPR - BELIZE AT CAPE MARCO, A CONDO, Condominium ProjectCAC Septembe�fi '5o14of 1 VII-12 Staff Reports 17 of 48 5:47:54 PM 7/31/2014 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: BELIZE AT CAPE MARCO, A CONDO (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 970 CAPE MARCO DRIVE MARCO ISLAND Florida 33937 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Condominium Project Rank: Condo Project License Number: PR1G025964 Status: Approved,Recorded Licensure Date: 07/03/2001 Expires: 01/01/2015 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Group View Related License Information View License Complaint View Additional Information 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 32399:: Email: Customer Contact Center:: Customer Contact Center: 950.487.1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Statement Under Florida law,errrad addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic marl to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395.*Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.roust provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The emails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=73449A 1 C4E8DAE4A3B... 7/31/2014 DBPR -VERACRUZ AT CAPE MARCO, Condominium Project CAC Septembef e 14of 1 VII-12 Staff Reports 18 of 48 5:09:18 PM 7/31/2014 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: VERACRUZ AT CAPE MARCO (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 940 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND Florida 34145 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Condominium Project Rank: Condo Project License Number: PR68957 Status: Approved,Recorded Licensure Date: 07/01/2003 Expires: 01/01/2015 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Group 07/01/2003 View Related License Information View License Complaint View Additional Information 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 32399 :: Email: Customer Contact Center :: Customer Contact Center: 8.50.487.1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Statement Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail, If you have any questions, please contact 850.487.1:395. *Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2017,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The emails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email addresses are public record,If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public. Please see our Cheater 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=A 1 EE3C85D3BC5BCF2... 7/31/2014 DBPR - TAMPICO, A CONDO, Condominium ProjectNe 14of 1 CAC Septembe VII-12 Staff Reports 19 of 48 5.'07:46 PM 7/31/2014 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: TAMPICO, A CONDO (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 930 CAPE MARCO RIVE MARCO ISLAND Florida 33937 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Condominium Project Rank: Condo Project License Number: PR1S022290 Status: Approved,Recorded Licensure Date: 09/22/1992 Expires: 01/01/2015 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Standard Group View Related License Information View License Complaint View Additional Information 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 32399:: Email: Customer Contact Center:: Customer Contact Center: 8.50.487.1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Statement Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic marl to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395. *Pursuant to Section 455,275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The ernails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=848562B 1 AA4091 AC 101... 7/31/2014 CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 20 of 48 Collier County- Local Government Funding Request Property Name: Belize at Cape Marco Property Address: 970 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 License Number: PR1G025964 Number of Units: 148 Property Name:Cozumel at Cape Marco Property Address: 960 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 License Number: MA00021570 Number of Units: 120 Property Name: Merida at Cape Marco Property Address: 990 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 License Number: MA00019919 Number of Units:90 Property Name: Monterrey at Cape Marco Property Address: 980 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 License Number: PR1U022727 Number of Units:136 Property Name:Tampico at Cape Marco Property Address: 930 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 License Number: PR1S022290 Number of Units:66 Property Name:Veracruz at Cape Marco Property Address: 940 CAPE MARCO DR MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 License Number: PR68957 Number of Units: 123 The above information was obtained from http://flhousingdata.shimberg.ufl.edujajgeo portal?action=results&report=81&nid=1100 in July of 2014. CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 21 of 48 ATTACHMENT 3 Project Worksheet Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC Septemtief',210M 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 22 of 48 PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0) Applicant Name: Application Title: COLLIER(COUNTY) CCGGS13-South Marco Beach Period of Performance Start: Period of Performance End: 07-03-2012 01-03-2014 Subgrant Application - Entire Application Application Title: CCGGS13-South Marco Beach Application Number: PA.04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0) Application Type: Subgrant Application(PW) Preparer Information Prefix Mr. First Name GREGORY Middle Initial Last Name SLATTON Title Beach Specialist Agency/Organization Name FEMA PA TAC Address 1 FEMA JFO Address 2 1940 N. Monroe Street, Ste 79 City Tallahassee State FL Zip 32303 Email steven.hyatt@em.myflorida.com Is the application preparer the Point of Contact? No Point of Contact Information Prefix Mr. First Name Len Middle Initial Last Name Price Title Administrator-Administrative Services Division Agency/Organization Collier(County) Address 1 3299 East Tamiami Trail Address 2 Suite 601 City Naples State FL https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC SeptembeW 201 f 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 23 of 48 ZIP 34112 - 5749 Phone 239-252-8908 Fax 239-252-8720 Email lenprice@colliergov.net Alternate Point of Contact Information Prefix Mr. First Name Steve Middle Initial Last Name Hyatt Title Deputy PAO Agency/Organization Florida Division of Emergency Management Address 1 2555 Shummard Oak Blvd. Address 2 City Tallahassee State FL ZIP 32399 Phone 850-487-1660 Fax Email steven.hyatt@em.myflorida.com Project Description Disaster Number: 4068 Pre-Application Number: PA-04-FL-4068-RPA-0063 Applicant ID: 021-99021-00 Applicant Name: COLLIER (COUNTY) Subdivision: Project Number: CCGGS13 Standard Project Number/Title: 799 - Recreational or Other Please Indicate the Project Type: Neither Alternate nor Improved Application Title: CCGGS13- South Marco Beach Category: G.RECREATIONAL OR OTHER Percentage Work Completed? 0.0% As of Date: 11-29-2012 Comments Applicant may request an Improved Project to incorporate repairs decribed in this PW with a planned renourishment project. 11/30/12-As described in 44 CFR 13.43, applicant must maintain all work-related records for a period of three (3) years from applicant closure (final payment), all records relative this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State, FEMA and the Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs. Attachments Damage Facilities (Part 1 of 2) https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/3 1/20 13 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC SeptembeW 21{f 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 24 of 48 Facility Site Number Facility Name Address County City State ZIP Previously Action Damaged? 1 South Marco Beach South Marco Island Collier Naples FL 34112 Yes Comments Attachments Hard Copy User Date Document Type Description File File Name Action Reference GREGORY 12- Additional DR1785 Marco DR1785 PW and docs.pdf SLATTON 2012 Information Beach o s and (9.17 Mb) View GREGORY12- 02 Drawings/Sketches FDEP approved 2005 Permit%20Drawings% View SLATTON 2012 plans 20(12-22-05).pdf(1.62 Mb) FDEP Permit GREGORY 12- Additional Modification 2006 Permit Mod(12-27- SLATTON 02 Information adding north 06).pdf(2.42 Mb) View 2012 beach 12- FDEP Beach FDEP Beach Management GREGORY Additional Management Plan - S. Marco excerpt.pdf View SLATTON 2012 Information Plan excerpt (28.88 kb) GREGORY 12 SLATTON 02- Map Location Map Location Map.pdf(898.71 kb) View 2012 GREGORY 12 SLATTON 02- Photos Site Visit Photos Photo Sheet.pdf(287.75 kb) View 2012 12- GREGORY 02 Drawings/Sketches Marco Beach SMarcoFinalDrawings.pdf View SLATTON 2012 Plans (841.82 kb) GREGORY 12 Additional Volume Change Marco Volume Change SLATTON 2012 Information Table Table.pdf(39.27 kb) View Facility Name: South Marco Beach Address 1: South Marco Island Address 2: County: Collier City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34112 Was this site previously damaged? Yes PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0): South Marco Island, FL https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC Septemlfe 2 of 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 25 of 48 Location: PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0): DAMAGE DESCRIPTION As a result of high winds and surf associated with Tropical Storm(TS) Debby , the applicant-maintained public beach lying between FDEP R- monuments R139 and G-5 in Collier County sustained significant beach erosion. Applicant's estimated erosion along 9,594 linear feet(LF) of shoreline is based upon a pre-storm survey (December 2011)and post- stormDescription and survey (August 2012) by applicant's coastal engineer, Atkins. The Damage Dimensions: attached Collier County Tropical Storm Debby Post-Storm Report, October 2012, describes survey methodology and details volume change locations in Table 16. Table 16 details losses along the full profile width of engineered beach between R139 to G-5, and shows that a total of 16,959 CY eroded during the 8-month period December 2011 —August 2012. PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0): "**SCOPE OF WORK**** WORK TO BE COMPLETED As an engineered, nourished, and regularly-maintained beach, South Marco Beach is eligible under Category G for PA funding to restore it to its pre-disaster condition.Applicant requests FEMA PA reimbursement of costs to replace sand erosion attributable to T.S. Debby. Debby-related sand loss is the volume lost between the applicant's pre-and-post storm surveys minus normally-occurring background losses during that 8-month interval. The engineering report does not detail the background losses, but states that the project area lost 5,595 CY between December 2010 and December 2011, a monthly rate of 466 CY. The Debby-caused loss was 16,959 CY—466 CY/mo x 8 months = 13,228 CY. The attached Volume Change Table details the changes over the improved beach. Applicant plans to replace the Debby-related losses as an integral part of his next scheduled beach renourishment project along with the replacement of 76,728 CY of T.S. Fay loss previously approved in Improved Project DR1785-PW 561.Applicant will include this PW's sand volume as a separate contract line item. No work has been done to date. Scope of Work: The cost estimate for this PW is based on estimated costs for DR1785 PW 561. No additional costs for mobilization/demobilization, environmental monitoring, or a geotechnical study are included since those costs were estimated and included in the DR1785 PW. Estimated costs are comparable to historical costs experienced by other applicants for similar work in the area and are deemed reasonable. Upon completion, this site will be returned to its pre-disaster design, function and capacity within the original footprint. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all local, state and/or federal permits as they may apply to this project. "***"**"**** Notes: To be eligible under Category G the beach must meet the following criteria (ref. PA Guide, FEMA-322, June 2007, pgs 86,87): A beach is considered eligible for permanent repair if it is an improvedbeach and has been routinely maintained prior to the disaster. A beach is considered to be an"improved beach" if the following criteria apply: the beach was constructed by the placement of sand to a designed elevation, width, grain size, and slope; and the beach have been maintained in accordance with a maintenance program involving the https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC SeptembP� zliqf 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 26 of 48 periodic re-nourishment of sand. By accepting this grant, applicant certifies that all work will done on property for which he is legally responsible and is accessible to the general public. Documentation maintained by the Applicant must typically include: a) Design documents including engineering specifications and grain size analysis b) "As-built" plans of the project c) Documentation of regular renourishment of the beach d) Pre-storm cross-sections of the beach e) Post-storm cross-sections of the beach. The project specialist has reviewed design plans, FDEP permits, and other documentation provided by the applicant and is satisfied that the facility meets FEMA's criteria for an improved beach. An excerpt from the FDEP FL Beach Management Plan is attached and ststes that the beach has been filled and imprroved in various ways since 1991. The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project. Associated eligible work is related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect cost rates."""* 12/2/2012 -As described in 44 CFR 13.43, applicant must maintain all work-related records for a period of three (3) years from applicant closure (final payment), all records relative this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State, FEMA and the Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs GIS Coordinates Project Location Latitude Longitude R144 25.92148 -81.7293 R148 26.91094 -81.72893 Special Considerations 1. Does the damaged facility or item of work have insurance coverage and/or is it an insurable No risk (e.g., buildings, equipment, vehicles, etc)? 2. Is the damaged facility located within a floodplain or coastal high hazard area and/or does it Yes have an impact on a floodplain or wetland? If you would like to make any comments, please enter them below. (maximum 4000 characters) FIRM 12021C0836H Zone VE 3. Is the damaged facility or item of work located within or adjacent to a Coastal Barrier No Resource System Unit or an Otherwise Protected Area? 4. Will the proposed facility repairs/reconstruction change the pre-disaster conditions (e.g., No footprint, material, location, capacity, use of function)? 5. Does the applicant have a hazard mitigation proposal or would the applicant like technical No assistance for a hazard mitigation proposal? 6. Is the damaged facility on the National Register of Historic Places or the state historic No listing? Is it older than 50 years? Are there more, similar buildings near the site? 7. Are there any pristine or undisturbed areas on, or near, the project site?Are there large No https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile:dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC septembeff 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 27 of 48 tracts of forestland? 8. Are there any hazardous materials at or adjacent to the damaged facility and/or item of No work? 9. Are there any other environmental or controversial issues associated with the damaged No facility and/or item of work? Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference GREGORY 12-02- FM12021C0836H.pdf(9.44 SLATTON 2012 Map FIRM Mb) View For Category C, D, E, F, and G Projects only Is effective mitigation feasible on this project? No If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Will mitigation be performed on any sites in this project? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next question is required Do you wish to attach a Hazard Mitigation Proposal? If you answered Yes to the above question, the next two questions are required Please provide the Scope of Work for the estimate: Would you like to add the Hazard Mitigation Proposal as a cost line item to the project cost? Comments Applicant requested mitigation on DR1785 PW 561 Attachments Cost Estimate Is this Project Worksheet for Cost Estimate Format (Preferred) Repair Sequence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Cost Action Description Quantity Measure Budget Class Estimate CEF Cost Estimate 1 9000 (See Attached 1 LS 161,194.00 CONSTRUCTION $ 161,194.00 Spreadsheet) Total Cost: $ 161,194.00 Insurance Adjustments (Deductibles, Proceeds and Settlements) Sequence Code Material and/or Unit Unit of Unit Price Subgrant Cost Action Description Quantity Measure Budget Class Estimate 1 9999 Direct Administrative 1 LS $ 0.00 PERSONNEL $ 0.00 Costs Total Cost: $ 0.00 Total Cost Estimate: $ 161,194.00 https://isource.fema.net/emmie/d ispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC SeptembP� e2715 0, f VII-12 Staff Reports 28 of 48 (Preferred Estimate Type+tnStA .:roue Adjustments) Awarded cost line items:S 161,104.00 Remaining cost items:$0.00 Comments Attachments User Date Document Description Hard Copy File File Name Action Type Reference GREGORY 12-09- Calculation CEF CEF CCGGS13 South Marco View SLATTON 2012 Sheet Estimate Island.pdf(115.93 kb) Existing Insurance Information Insurance Type Policy No. Bldg/Property Content Insurance Deductible Years Amount Amount Amount Amount Required Comments Attachments Comments and Attachments Name of Section Comment Attachment Applicant may request an Improved Project to incorporate repairs decribed in this PW with a planned renourishment project. 11/30/12 -As described in 44 CFR 13.43, applicant must maintain all work-related records for a Project Description period of three (3) years from applicant closure (final payment), all records relative this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State, FEMA and the Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs. DR1785 PW and docs.pdf 2005Per_rnit%020Drawings% 20(12-22-05).pdf 2006 Permit Mod(12-27- 06).pdf FDEP Beach_Management Damage Facilities Plan- S. Marcoexcerpt.pdf Location Map.pdf Photo Sheet.pdf SMarcoFinalDrawings.pdf Marco Volume Change Table.pdf Special Considerations FM12021C0836H.pdf Mitigation Applicant requested mitigation on DR1785 PW 561 Cost Estimate CEF_CCGGS13South Marco Island.pdf CCGGS13-Signed Application Part1.pdf Application Level CCGGS1.3-Signed Application_Part2.pdf CCGGS13 - Signed https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC SeptemkfeR20f 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 29 of 48 Application_Part3.pdf CCGGS13 - Signed Application_Part4.pdf Bundle Reference#(Amendment#) Date Awarded PA-04-FL-4068-State-0045(44) 07-29-2013 Subgrant Application - FEMA Form 90-91 Note:The Effective Cost Share for this application is 75% FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROJECT WORKSHEET DISASTER PROJECT PA ID NO. DATE CATEGORY NO. 021-99021-00 12-14-2012 G FEMA 4068 - DR -FL CCGGS13 APPLICANT:COLLIER(COUNTY) WORK COMPLETE AS OF: 11-29-2012:0% Site 1 of 1 DAMAGED FACILITY: COUNTY: Collier South Marco Beach LOCATION: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: 26.91094 -81.72893 25.92148 -81.7293 PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0): South Marco Island,FL DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0): DAMAGE DESCRIPTION As a result of high winds and surf associated with Tropical Storm(TS)Debby,the applicant-maintained public beach lying between FDEP R-monuments R139 and G-5 in Collier County sustained significant beach erosion.Applicants estimated erosion along 9,594 linear feet(LF)of shoreline is based upon a pre-storm survey(December 2011)and post-storm survey(August 2012) by applicants coastal engineer,Atkins.The attached Collier County Tropical Storm Debby Post-Storm Report,October 2012,describes survey methodology and details volume change locations in Table 16.Table 16 details losses along the full profile width of engineered beach between R139 to G-5,and shows that a total of 16,959 CY eroded during the 8-month period December 2011—August 2012. SCOPE OF WORK: PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079(0): ****SCOPE OF WORK****WORK TO BE COMPLETED As an engineered,nourished,and regularly-maintained beach,South Marco Beach is eligible under Category G for PA funding to restore it to its pre-disaster condition.Applicant requests FEMA PA reimbursement of costs to replace sand erosion attributable to T.S.Debby.Debby-related sand loss is the volume lost between the applicant's pre-and-post storm surveys minus normally-occurring background losses during that 8-month interval.The engineering report does not detail the background losses,but states that the project area lost 5,595 CY between December 2010 and December 2011,a monthly rate of 466 CY.The Debby- caused loss was 16,959 CY—466 CY/mo x 8 months=13,228 CY.The attached Volume Change Table details the changes over the improved beach.Applicant plans to replace the Debby-related losses as an integral part of his next scheduled beach renourishment project along with the replacement of 76,728 CY of T.S.Fay loss previously approved in Improved Project DR1785-PW 561.Applicant will include this PWS sand volume as a separate contract line item.No work has been done to date.The cost estimate for this PW is based on estimated costs for DR1785 PW 561.No additional costs for mobilization/demobilization,environmental monitoring,or a geotechnical study are included since those costs were estimated and included in the DR1785 PW.Estimated costs are comparable to historical costs experienced by other applicants for similar work in the area and are deemed reasonable.Upon completion,this site will be returned to its pre-disaster design,function and capacity within the original footprint.The applicant is responsible for obtaining all local,state and/or federal permits as they may apply to this project.************Notes:To be eligible under Category G the beach must meet the following criteria(ref. https://isource.fema.net/emm ie/di spatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTi le=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC SeptemlieW 20'ilf 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 30 of 48 PA Guide,FEMA-322,June 2007,pgs 86,87):A beach is considered eligible for permanent repair if it is an improvedbeach and has been routinely maintained prior to the disaster.A beach is considered to be an"improved beach"if the following criteria apply:the beach was constructed by the placement of sand to a designed elevation,width,grain size,and slope;and the beach have been maintained in accordance with a maintenance program involving the periodic re-nourishment of sand.By accepting this grant,applicant certifies that all work will done on property for which he is legally responsible and is accessible to the general public.Documentation maintained by the Applicant must typically include:a)Design documents including engineering specifications and grain size analysis b)"As-built"plans of the project c)Documentation of regular renourishment of the beach d)Pre-storm cross-sections of the beach e)Post-storm cross-sections of the beach.The project specialist has reviewed design plans,FDEP permits,and other documentation provided by the applicant and is satisfied that the facility meets FEMA's criteria for an improved beach.An excerpt from the FDEP FL Beach Management Plan is attached and ststes that the beach has been filled and imprroved in various ways since 1991.The subgrantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific project.Associated eligible work is related to administration of the PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22.These costs are treated consistently and uniformly as direct costs in all federal awards and other subgrantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect cost rates.**"*""12/2/2012-As described in 44 CFR 13.43,applicant must maintain all work-related records for a period of three(3)years from applicant closure(final payment),all records relative this project worksheet are subject to examination and audit by the State,FEMA and the Comptroller General of the United States and must reflect work related to disaster specific costs Does the Scope of Work change the pre- disaster conditions at the site? l~Yes Special Considerations included? r Yes F No F No Hazard Mitigation proposal included? Yes 1 No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? Yes F No PROJECT COST ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST CEF Cost Estimate 1 9000 (See Attached 1/LS $ 161,194.00 $ 161,194.00 Spreadsheet) 2 0000 Insurance 0/LS $0.00 $ 0.00 Adjustments 3 9999 Direct Administrative 1/LS $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Costs TOTAL $ 161,194.00 COST PREPARED BY GREGORY SLATTON TITLE Beach Specialist SIGNATURE APPLICANT REP. Len Price TITLE Administrator-Administrative Services Division SIGNATURE COLLIER(COUNTY) : PA-04-FL-4068-PW-01079 Conditions Information Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status CWA CONDITION: The subgrantee is responsible for coordinating with and obtaining any required section 401 and 404 permit(s)from FDEP Beaches and Coastal Final Review Other(EHP) (CI A)Water Act Management Division to No Approved obtain a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) permit prior to initiating work. The subgrantee shall comply with all conditions of the required permit. All coordination pertaining to these activities https://isource.fema.net/emm ie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC Septenraf1 1A4015 VII-12 Staff Reports 31 of 48 should be documented and compliance maintained in their permanent files. Failure to comply with these conditions may jeopardize FEMA funding;verification of compliance will be required at project closeout. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will monitor ground Standard disturbance and if any Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#3 potential archeological No Approved resources are discovered,will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. This review does not address all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires Standard recipient to comply with all Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#2 federal, state and local laws. No Approved Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. Any change to the approved Standard scope of work will require re- Final Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance with No Approved NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. NHPA: Prior to conducting repairs, applicant must identify the source and location of sand material. If the sand souce is privately owned, or is located on previously National Historic undisturbed land, FEMA Final Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act consultation with the State No Approved (NHPA) Historic Preservation Officer will be required. Failure to comply with this condition may jeopardize FEMA funding; verification of compliance will be required at project closeout. Executive Order Final Review Other(EHP) 11988- No Approved Floodplains ESA CONDITIONS: Per the Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO; Service August 22,2011),the subgrantee must adhere to the following: Sea Turtle https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC Septenlbb$f112I 1f 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 32 of 48 Reasonable and Prudent Measures, the Standard Manatee Conditions for In- Water Work shall be implemented, commitments outlined in the SPBO regarding piping plovers must be implemented, FWC standard guidelines for the protection of nesting shorebirds must be Endangered implemented for work between Final Review Other(EHP) Species Act February 15 to August 31, No Approved (ESA) surveys shall be conducted daily throughout the construction period. All of these conditions are included in the USACE permit and consultation with USFWS. Verification that these project conditions have been met will be required as part of project closeout. Non-compliance with EHP project conditions may jeopardize federal funding. CZMA CONDITION: The subgrantee is responsible for obtaining any required FDEP Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems Coastal Zone permits/waivers. Compliance Final Review Other(EHP) Management Act with FDEP requirements No Approved (CZMA) constitutes compliance with Florida CZM. Failure to comply with these conditions may jeopardize FEMA funding; verification of compliance will be required at project closeout. At close out this project is subject to actual cost recalculation. Applicant is required to submit at close out, line item cost that can be aligned with the CEF format Final Review Reporting Close out cost used to estimate the costs for Yes Approved Requirements submission this project and the DR 1785 pw 561 project. At close out this worksheet is subject to recalculation to comply with FEMA second appeal, Collier County, DR 1393, May 14, 2012. Cory Spaulding TAC. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, EHP Review Other(EHP) Standard applicant will monitor ground No Recommended Condition#3 disturbance and if any potential archeological resources are discovered,will https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTi le=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC Septen igfl,113.af 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 33 of 48 immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA. This review does not address all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires Standard recipient to comply with all EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#2 federal, state and local laws. No Recommended Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding. Any change to the approved Standard scope of work will require re- EHP Review Other(EHP) Condition#1 evaluation for compliance with No Recommended NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders. NHPA: Prior to conducting repairs, applicant must identify the source and location of sand material. If the sand souce is privately owned, or is located on previously National Historic undisturbed land, FEMA EHP Review Other(EHP) Preservation Act consultation with the State No Recommended (NHPA) Historic Preservation Officer will be required. Failure to comply with this condition may jeopardize FEMA funding; verification of compliance will be required at project closeout. Executive Order EHP Review Other(EHP) 11988- No Recommended Floodplains ESA CONDITIONS: Per the Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO; Service August 22,2011),the subgrantee must adhere to the following: Sea Turtle Reasonable and Prudent Measures, the Standard Manatee Conditions for In- Endangered Water Work shall be EHP Review Other(EHP) Species Act implemented, commitments No Recommended (ESA) outlined in the SPBO regarding piping plovers must be implemented, FWC standard guidelines for the protection of nesting shorebirds must be implemented for work between February 15 to August 31, surveys shall be conducted daily throughout the https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC Septenibi$f1,12 1 f 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 34 of 48 construction period. All of these conditions are included in the USACE permit and consultation with USFWS. Verification that these project conditions have been met will be required as part of project closeout. Non-compliance with EHP project conditions may jeopardize federal funding. CZMA CONDITION: The subgrantee is responsible for obtaining any required FDEP Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems Coastal Zone permits/waivers. Compliance EHP Review Other(EHP) Management Act with FDEP requirements No Recommended (CZMA) constitutes compliance with Florida CZM. Failure to comply with these conditions may jeopardize FEMA funding; verification of compliance will be required at project closeout. CWA CONDITION: The subgrantee is responsible for coordinating with and obtaining any required section 401 and 404 permit(s)from FDEP Beaches and Coastal Management Division to obtain a Coastal Construction Control Line(CCCL) permit prior to initiating work. The EHP Review Other(EHP) Clean Water Act subgrantee shall comply with No Recommended (CWA) all conditions of the required permit. All coordination pertaining to these activities should be documented and compliance maintained in their permanent files. Failure to comply with these conditions may jeopardize FEMA funding; verification of compliance will be required at project closeout. Internal Comments No. Queue User Date/Time Reviewer Comments Award 07-29-2013 7 Review SYSTEM 02:48 PM ACCEPTED GMT Reviewed project, storm related sand quantities are calculated with normal background erosion subtracted based upon applicant supplied data. Worksheet sand quantities were calculated in compliance with May 14, 2012 second appeal for this applicant, FEMA DR 1393. Repairs for sand lost in this https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC Septertibigc1 1A,lf 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 35 of 48 disaster are to be done in conjunction with the applicant's regular beach nourishment and sand loss from DR 1785 PW 561. Project is subject to close out recalculation of actual costs. Present costs are based upon estimates. At close out TAYLOR 07-02-2013 the two FEMA projects from different disaster will be 6 Final Review MOODY 08:47 PM recalculated based upon actual costs as well as to pro rate the KAREN GMT fixed costs proportionally as is detailed in the second appeal which describes the method of calculating FEMA eligible costs when FEMA projects are combined together and or combined with the applicants regular beach nourishment cycle. Cory Spaulding TAC JOHNSON 06-25-2013 5 Final Review SR DAVID 12:02 PM 6-25-2013 PW need to have a Final Review Completed GMT JOHNSON 06-25-2013 4 Final Review SR DAVID 12:01 PM 6-25-2013 PW need to have a Final Review Completed GMT Reviewed project, storm related sand quantities are calculated with normal background erosion subtracted based upon applicant supplied data. Worksheet sand quantities were calculated in compliance with May 14, 2012 second appeal for this applicant, FEMA DR 1393. Repairs for sand lost in this disaster are to be done in conjunction with the applicant's 06-14-2013 regular beach nourishment and sand loss from DR 1785 PW SPAULDING 561. Project is subject to close out recalculation of actual 3 Final Review CORY GMT PM costs. Present costs are based upon estimates. At close out the two FEMA projects from different disaster will be recalculated based upon actual costs as well as to pro rate the fixed costs proportionally as is detailed in the second appeal which describes the method of calculating FEMA eligible costs when FEMA projects are combined together and or combined with the applicants regular beach nourishment cycle. Cory Spaulding TAC SOW: Collier County (25.92148, -81.7293), CAT G-Applicant made repairs to South Marco Beach, consisting of placing 13,228 CY of beach-quality sand on 9,594 LF of damaged beach surface, between monuments R139 and G5. Beach returned to predisaster condition. - ssander5-02/06/2013 18:26:33 GMT CWA: See condition.- ssander5-02/06/2013 18:15:00 GMT CZMA: See condition. - ssander5-02/06/2013 18:16:19 GMT EO 11990: Not in wetlands per review of USFWS National 05-31-2013 Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapper, accessed 02/06/2013. - COLLINS ssander5-02/06/2013 18:22:08 GMT 2 EHP Review DAWN GMT PM ESA: Per USFWS concurrence letter dated April 24, 2013 (attached). SEE CONDITIONS. -dcollin3- 05/31/2013 13:41:45 GMT EO 11988:The project is located in Zone AE per Collier County FIRM Panel# 12021 C0836H, dated 05/16/2012. Floodplain avoidance by relocating the facility or abandoning its use is not a practicable alternative and the no-action alternative would adversely impact social or economic resources for the community. See FIRM attached in EMMIE. - ssander5-02/06/2013 18:19:14 GMT NHPA: See condition. -ssander5-02/06/2013 18:14:30 GMT Quality ROCQUE Sub grantee application has been reviewed appears to be 1 Assurance/ RAYMOND 01-11-2013 correct with required information attached. Quality 02:28 PM https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants CAC SeptenflAgf1 12Vit 15 VII-12 Staff Reports 36 of 48 Control !GMT https://isource.fema.net/emmie/dispatchDestination.do?menuTile=&topTile=dsHeader&b... 07/31/2013 CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 37 of 48 ATTACHMENT 4 10 Year Financial Plan ^ P ,si . O , o '' , RE R. .0' N CO v n r m m n V ry NV ,31 vt' ‘413U- C 'Hn ^ ^ N ^ - - N N N - n 7 N m O Or N 0. 0 CC co V co v , g , F, 1oo oo o El E. aa� N � m N n y n m m m Mu m a ry n u - m ENv p t ns U> N 0 a f N m n N « r,-,- s ry N • m - ,4:_i iy U 2 ^ m M N o .---, a € S o Sso 8 g p N a ^ n N n N « ^ ry N M . ,g1m m R LL tO N O m 00 . 0, r'9 a o S N g ' g S aa N ry n ; N m oo m ^ mn } p N `° ry : N ry iL a N E 8 g & 8 N LL Y m ry n n .- ry N n it, p n .m :iv, 2 N ^ N a. O - }LL o „ m . _Np N n nm N N m U 2 ry mn ry a , , . . g . - o RAN g e mop e n N r m ry nN m ^ N t o ry o n « ry a ✓ 10 r a o C ` N CO 8 N ry r 'o n m m {L O N N « ry m ^ v r ry e. g' s Q C m � - o nib ' E • EN N m N r ry 'RI ry n o m ^ EV �iN W+ O N m 7 gi sry x d a M L w E , gry , n o '0 • O p na ry N nry ryNN ' 1 mm ' 'rN O c ` N q O N a OC d v , n . , . ' E. S . o E. Z 'O g! i ^ ' m r ; N r, r EEEFF « EE, ' C O m - rv ; n d 3 LL m O r o 9yy m 0 r' n ' " m L e « N ry - _ F. N m M o e' m .- 'E'® 1'� N C' .O- N N .^-ni anm E 77 E a E - 2 . E i - gK' IT, rc z mrt - rc r E E c g 3 b a 3 E c ti < 2 .c9 Y $ o, < `a f .0 - z D _ _ E n LL w - t. g w _ rc c m 'u1 a E v - ` ZcC Ap Ez m N o a c . ` zw K c m = mm 2 (.3"- 4°.: 11811 O = cm 2 &' mm fU aa2 ' E13 L " f , m " UO o o = 0 f m ' 3 7 o > z > mm 0 0 0 m _ n Q ¢ U n Y n c c W m a f c c w O {' c c - v E 3 s ' ' 3 3 ' « 5 .2 g " ,, o a d a d 0. Cr. 4 a` Q R 4 0. Cr. 1 E m V m -" K 0 2w 'o o m 0 w 2 t = W it mb , 20LL o % c N ; n no 3 $ n 0 3w vKK ° . l ' ° Z mg g 88888888888 EmzW vN3a m m mmmm 88 m w ¢ vv ¢ '� '- r , u n , � ; / � [� \/ . / . , . 1 ' _ � # $ >•v g 2 , \ o o_ a [- 2 -± m © � \ � Z2 ti, . . . 22. . , . ) \ \ � �`L To 0 0 �\ 0` ` , k/ / / § 2 /( ' \ � ` � / ( k ) �a. gg / } ! 2 : k ; n ; o. § ! [ a. : 2 \ k G k / 5-1 / : 2 [ ; . k fk 2 \ / \ \ £ y § | ! P.1 12 \ \ / \ 2 2 § 9; . . . . . . . 7 2 \ , : , v \ ! § } . . . . . .EL . . $ ) , , , a ) _ § § . . . . , § o \A; 22 [ \ ® ® (c2 ti ! \ \ ' \ ' ' \\ \ } \ � 7 j } , m � § k Z ! # ) . . . . . I... — 222 / / ) Q_ 7 if/ \ }/ ] ) . r ; ; 7 ` e cg . . 22 ; | \� } � j ( } ( \ - } } j \ ! � } mom }\ i=w.- \ /f2 ƒ ] : } CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 40 of 48 ATTACHMENT 5 Referendum establishing the Collier County Tourist Development Tax CAC September 11,2014 FROI9 : ELECTIONS OFFICE FAX NO. : 941-774-9468 'Jun. 09 200AI-+4=SFalcRepea 41 of48 P12 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION Collier County,Florida-November 3,1992 + 1 . .74,,asitor day °" �- . ... REFERENDUM ELECTION TO APPROVE THE LEVY OF 2%TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX SHALL COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO,92-00 BE APPROVED TO LEVY,IMPOSE AND SET A TWO PERCENT TOURIST DEVELOPMENTTAX ON EACH DOLLAR OF THE TOTAL RENT CHARGED ON ANY LIVING QUARTERS OR ACCOMMODATIONS',N ANY HOTEL,MOTEL,RESORT,APARTMENT, ROOMING HOUSE,MOBILE HOME PARK.RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK,OR CONDOMINIUM FOR A TERM OF SIX MONTHS OR LESS FOR FINANCING BEACH RENOURISHMENT ANC MAINTENANCE, AND TO PROMOTE AND ADVERTISE TOURIStvr, YES FOR THE TOURIST CEVELCPMENTTAX 219— NO ACAINSTTHE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX 220 m STRAW BALLOT SHALL THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS VOTE TO LEW AN ADDITIONAL CENT TO THE ORIGINAL TYPO PERCENT TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX ON EACH DOLLAR OF THE RENT CHARGED ON ANY LIVING OIJARTERS OR ACCOMMODATIONS IN ANY HOTEL,MOTEL RESORT,APARTMENT, ROOM'NGHCUSE,MOBILE HOME PARK,RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK,OR CONDOMINIUM FOR A TERM OF SIX MONTHS OR LESS IN ORDER TO PAY DEBT SERVICE ON BONDS ISSUED TO FINANCETHE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL FRANCHISE FACILITY/ YES 226 NO 227-* ! COUNTYWIDE 110 CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports "N 42 • = l-.ci • E = g Q 4 ., A, 4 t 4) 4) 'W6 6C off'=-' `' E"4 E"'4 c'2iiNg 4 R3 Q ' �(up 16 . W rW �c . = Ni G`) 0 Cl.) 4.) r • a,; : LI Q 0 6 ale Q 0 o. 0 Z • 111111111 0 V qua` Y73L/V . CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports _ " 'Q x �' 43 of 48 17 E= A u C E N sO N u �: O O C CO Ecd 7 u • 0. `^ N O •O y CO - 4 = 0 C C cc p' . y CS c E O u .- M C C. 3 > y o > d G O c E C3 C y 0 CJ E v a 3 0 E IZ u z .� nc °: N aJ E a 0.. •4 .. 'j •-. v C oL C . u c C.) c O 0 v x o 0 O o L C a' E 0 aj C Q cj S s H y a. > O CE• . OCO , sc. •yv M G _ •E is O C 0 0. L CCC E cj COO h ey, Ci0 > V. .0 a s O E E-• c O 0 0 C E i o ci 4,1 .. . E-» ,, , p 0co Ea 0.0 E - o a -al C-4= ►-4 0 w cOXH y N � c v• Ia) , 0EEC� y O J •• £' cr, . 1 < Ew � > = E ' c C -L. - C > � ( cJ CGti y - r 0 j. CyQ ~ O Sx ' -a C=1 0.▪ .a y C 0 .a U c' R L C : s. oE- o E oc) cE L aJ v c � c > > O —' O U 4.) 00 C3 cO0E C y 'O > 3 G -4 E ` i .0 0Q 4) • C' c 0 EC4 .0o . v Cs 0 v o c ... 0 .--. w �. 0 Y h e-) '7., 'C y U G y al ;5 ..1 OC w + ar: ..•-. a '4.-* L 0 C 0 s v.0 ai C 0 uE > h •V CEd ' E3 .o C 'o E.3 o .cH 00CO • t. - H � .00.L cs S .0 L O 0 0 00 x o g v1 C3 u O V w C. o 7 QaV C e`. o EpC O G 0 O.,� y U e , _ w0N �—VI y O Co ( C :� U 0 C 1V 0 . C 'Q *"• O Q' — q " �ami ^ , c . C CeN � .c ' G , •0 "O ~ � 7i te 0f.C 6} • 1 Gu C 0 VI -Si 0.es . a.) *•:.; ' Eoc .0 CEe oEu 5 oa oZ g� � $ u o. O. u ; 7 va .3 + U 'C 0R ^ , c " 00 ; oo U _ wO • >> > •Q p C _ •v •O > 00 0 0 ►. o g C 7 y CO h = V "O C u Iv y 0 0 =• 4, w vCo o �' n 0 p0 .` C h CO V > G00au E 3 ,n - c 0-0 .. ` H 00 cn es8 E. O o '0 c.u .. ._ d0 K • O U u .5 , •; O UO a) 0u 06) E CO y > LO , au P.y 0 O to [° j L .0-^ ..) o ECA E 0 a) b L 0. C . e QQ s30 uT ocJ •a co ca d f? � = 3_ E o c = oCCo �S .'•O u, 2. L. aE c.) .c 0 = , o : � ou v c.)i 4 L O a= h S ` C 'c vi P. O a r `d R ci O '0QN • y :` E CL) CJ .0" Eflac. .0 ►- .3 =R Ee) y 'GEaE E 3 •v >t 30FsL . a - .a 3 .8 F8 1 s vi kd 06 o; E y( 6) U 2 y L U = > 0 o z w O O C L N O C %O C C G07 O •fl os U C `•' y ai c" WW .c▪ c 'fl 'ta a. ' C 0 cOJ E W y 4 aj E 0 O ... E Fes' g •8 O E o C E - N C c > E P C O a "- �.. 0+ •V E o a3 v u a y o r E s E ,9 -S o 7 0. Eu aj — CU C Cl) = `�' a n 0 h Q. c'=i c ce E aj u y •p C �' 6� c0 C .0 0 r-; ►--1 E - '� ,a " .n o L 'E E o c-• E od 'a o a, o N Uo r3 y > >, o Ct. y O O O 0. 1•' > 7 0 .0 X O h h > C E O R _ L h T3 U d X ►� > R u E 0 s, E E c E a ... 4)a 0 `_. `' 0 a .o •`--j ••• c QI A § 0 = co c c �'' g = E o o. E 0 ; = w .0 o c 'R o •E w 5 co 0 aj o u 4.o E o t c o — E u a a E Z E > o o E o U c .c c > d a ` o.^ a E L 0 C. �J Xx O c o."' F� •O aj C u o Yd V C v .S vj 0 C E O L. 'C 4 -[ as L' j z t E cs o U co 17 Ca. r • ' E u o s s; ��+ '45 E R. 0 aj " ... o • a 3 O o 0 aj -Cufl co ? o o Ep u o E *� r s o L .0 T >> 0 L' 0 " t w O -^ V L aj .C. O G O 4, O 0. d g E C..s z a 3 sncaa a �t5 0.� 3c� E osc.) a• 3 •... E~ co — ,-4 t•"1 V CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 44 of 48 • N T • i ) 'NNINN ) . NNNS 1 � y�N i- • ` GN � � CN ui ; ro 1/1 tv CO ro, � ro mlco al m' � ro m �:�lml�i (i (i. �; a a o 14. �l.Ll U...:0_ I,1- LL.:a!EL a:a u- 4'� q,,IL a a a' E i . � c O V CA•C) (r) V t\I,-; C 0 N •--I N e-- CO I O 0 (C;r- C•, c0 . E f-: O+LO D(�IN— (Ni 0 ICO N,r h- CO LO,0 cD.l� v{r1 5ila �'N r;',� R r, N' • Q;(D OICO (n In N 1�'M10D •- , 0), ,In Z ' ' ` I ' I0) (D I c0 co n u-) LO c .- • I,n 17 CDO O in 7CO 7I7,(n O (7.C7 N ILO 0 G: IV IV N (+') NN N I1-' r- e- r-, r-; I i a I I 1 _._ i j . 'in N.'r ('');CN (r) 00:N III- O,0 (•) • 'c" c•) r-!In!(1) 'r- ,co r).� O QIc�1� r- S S � C;>n � rn h OJr--- (r),Lt) V .-!Z)•u310);r- O (D C7 LO O) O C,L)-�(D c (O ♦♦♦�!III//)++�� 0 V' (`)"P Q)'N. 1N-,QIM,O (..:N CO (D Q)1 ' ? 14" (N (N r N:tp;. (N �.s-,N I;V �i r i J _.. I , i W I I . I I ' • te z :J 'M .4 I _ • O N • I I. ' •I ppb V ° �' : 3 la t` :4.• C ny • 1 .J • N3i12 rS I I W i (a E fO 3' a) E a1 I �: uj i� c;D oI o w I - a it 0 i` o• • cI 'N I U mi e Q. F— _ o .a _ o• a. Z N .' U• 0 i�0.!I a)1 �i i IU 'y' N• '� 10- cp9 • !_ BVI O �' I( } �3 o:Cg a) C 10• N J:?r V) ` C ` 2�c NI O. ai U z Iv)' C) $)i ea N n W S xl^ > y ' C' ;E.: N.'Z ,(A rn -. N v V F� C'I �/ cc' 0 I'x � 5 x x ,0 ,s'O N.0) c 0 .0..= ole a°Ji o:P 21 �'; 6L V I W. > > 0 co I.•._ 0!'4,13 . _ O i •> V - x : '5 92. �. W I- a, trl-;I- ' 00;c 0,113 '-'7.' = i-.5 ofM a) c•u t;s, _ • I i(U - }' ix �>•+'I(U �.v •0 K5 . (u. o aim QI�i 70- o.c' a x. ;W QI c0 i� is O'„• 1E, h; J ' `o 0 5 EIE;F- I7 W..2•Sz'�.yl� O1 - c -.aj a Imo'o,: of 01 a.,a. I c: o x a !< 7=‘,E U �a a; Fox I . x xi :prp a) QJ i0 to,- >1 cly o' �I� �I t:' ,-1 e'g;•2 w Ctj di .q• c `imit6 d , a' c a of C3 11 • z'm ,c,,z �, _ Iv I , a _, • 1 • ;0'0 =1., 0 (n >'®121 a)Iyl(II'... o1� ,_ v t;� .z,i41 I.) 9 0I N N 1....,,, QJ 0 ,,,,),("2..1--.. 151 „, I tcGL 'u23.3.--3_, a. p x U Iu) cn 71.3! 10 C °_�-) UI� 6I 0 � E•G:• = I'LL er•CJItM cI8 14oi-,..J iN �,e;1-II- 'C. co, . C m rn N Ci, o „? a; E 8i3 aii a) i ezIN U O' I cg'. w o (2 .c 1. 1t ct J J $ • I -- ai O --- 66 ' - I(.):0: 'U U;U U!U�Ui0 C.) UUIU 0 UIf- r-'v; a w Olin i)! o • I1 TI 1 O c 0 O':o N N N'OIO'CO1001V N{N'0l0,(.0 (o (o In;VlQ (22 0 • I Ma) mIa2 0) I�'O O) 02 CO C 00;0 �'CQ.n CO K: V a2, I I I� CCr. �I?'j �: o 6, R. t.f) (n t.6•M M O'O .4 p• I (D M N, • ,s-'C4 ` EN L cn cn !'- e••• sir , r T'' �,11 f. i e- cs, - :iJ e- '- '"1 r.r (7 N- O) C91 r-:Cn .-i GI) 1 co 1 r .- 0 I I I • f.... 1 I I I 1 I > N cr (Io t•Bsd PIv4(u1yt mu ;w6►j E1:6Z110!e 66M11 • lY !TdJ <_ d9!„n enm+'ar� +wvn+•o •, .••••, E/0 aEed 99E aor f,d?t:_? 96 *0;90 l£E9Et•91b6 T.OH :AQ lues CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 45 of 48 ATTACHMENT 6 Resolution CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 46 of 48 RESOLUTION NO. 13 - 226 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S TWO "FLORIDA BEACH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2014/2015 FUNDING REQUESTS" TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR LONG RANGE FUNDING REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2014/2015, AGREEING TO SERVE AS THE LOCAL SPONSOR, SUPPORT PROPOSED PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND COMMITTED TO PROVIDING THE REQUIRED LOCAL COST SHARE. WHEREAS, the Natural Resources Department, acting on behalf of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, has prepared two Florida Beach Management Program 2014/2015 Funding Requests to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for long range grant funding for Fiscal Years 2014-2015; and WHEREAS, the funding requests are to fund the following Collier County projects: (1) Collier County Beach Renourishment which includes the Naples Beaches, Vanderbilt Beach, Park Shore, and (2) the South Marco Beach Renourishment Project required monitoring costs; and WHEREAS, the timely maintenance and restoration of these high quality and readily accessible public recreational beaches is critical to preserve their value and viability, and to provide a boost to both the environment and the economy of Collier County tourism, including hotels, restaurants and related commercial activities; and WHEREAS, the role of the County government in maintaining and restoring beaches is appropriate and crucial; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners supports these two funding requests and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request for Fiscal Years 2014-2015; and (40 CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 47 of 48 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to serve as the Local Sponsor; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is able and committed to providing the required Local Cost Share; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners agrees to support proposed project activities; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has enacted the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended, which commits funding to beach renourishment, beach maintenance and beach park facilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board supports the two Florida Beach Management Program 2014/2015 Funding Requests prepared for submittal to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for long range funding for Fiscal Years 2014/2015 and requests approval from the FDEP for each funding request. 1, The Board of County Commissioners is willing to serve as the Local Sponsor and support the renourishment projects. The County's Natural Resources Department has the staff dedicated to provide Project Management and Administrative support. 2. The Board of County Commissioners is committed to providing the required Local Cost Share. The required funds have been committed through the Tourist Development Tax Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended. Additional funds may become available through Federal funding sources. 2 CAC September 11,2014 VII-12 Staff Reports 48 of 48 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this <M4i-N, day of (7,.2)A0\::,tt-v- , 2013. ATTEST: ' . 7 BOARD OF COUNTY •MMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCKtLERK COLLIE C. NTY, F ORIDA . I By: 1, A - At as to A, . Peputy Clerk GI:ilia". iller, Esq., Chairwoman ttnuriairman S' Approv d -.4f0 formand -I ality C,$ ,7 olleen . Assistant dt,inty Attorney '., kir Stale at riot County at COLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT this is a true and,, correct copy of a document on Me in 09 0031,5328 Etc rd Moine ,7,1d Pvcafds of ci;gtier'County VflTNESS rry roll?'ii 0fftdiat4eal this Iø4 ..1", ',1 ock -4tt DWIGHT E.BRC CLERicOF COURTS, ,'. s 3 CAC September 11,2014 VII-13 Staff Reports 1 of 2 From: McAloinGary To: HambrightGaiL Subject: FW: Status of the Marco Island Central Beach regrade project Date: Monday, September 08,2014 10:53:38 AM Staff reports item 13 From: Mohamed Dabees [mailto:md@humistonandmoore.com] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 10:03 AM To: McAlpinGary Cc: Brett Moore; Steve Foge Subject: RE: Status of the Marco Island Central Beach regrade project Hi Gary, Since the previous update on August 27 additional progress included numerical modeling and analysis tasks to simulate potential morphology change for proposed design.These tasks included: 1. Evaluation of regional and local wave climate over the past 8 years. 2. Evaluation of potential annual longshore sediment transport at boundaries of project area. 3. Setup beach morphology model for existing conditions. Work in progress includes validation of the beach morphology model which will be followed by model production runs to evaluate proposed design. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mohamed Mohamed Dabees, PhD. PE. Humiston & Moore Engineers 239-594-2021 From: McAlpinGary [mailto:GaryMcAlpin(acolliergov,net] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:25 PM To: Steve Foge Subject: FW: Status of the Marco Island Central Beach regrade project Importance: High Steve, I have a CAC meeting a week from today. Can you update the status below? From: Steve Foge [mailto:sf( humistonandmoore,com] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:36 AM To: McAlpinGary Cc: Brett Moore; Mohamed Dabees Subject: RE: Status of the Marco Island Central Beach regrade project CAC September 11,2014 VII-13 Staff Reports 2 of 2 Gary, Yes, we are making good progress: 1) We have (or nearly completed) a number of necessary background tasks to support a refinement in the design sections. These include evaluation of morphology change and development of the sediment budget analysis involving: • Completed analysis of regional data sets over the past 20 years to document offshore and nearshore trends of bathymetric change. • Development of regional littoral cells and documenting long term volumetric change rates. • Development of a sediment budget analysis to assist in projecting expected evolution of the beach and adjacent areas post construction. 2) Design template design: • Completed evaluation of profile change analysis based on previous surveys. • Update proposed cut and fill sections within each profile to address low berm elevation areas and minimize impacts on nearshore processes. • Authorized nearshore survey to complement upland survey data to provide up to date estimates on projected cut and fill volumes. 3) Marriott coordination between CCCL permit process and JCP Brett met with Tony McNeal of DEP on the CCCL permit for Marriott to ensure no issue with their contribution of sand to the JCP project(in development). Tony was supportive and Brett is working with Marriott on their submittal. Brett or Milton Baker will be following up with you on a letter to support the CCCL.application. We should have update plans and information for you to look over next week. Steve Foge Humiston & Moore Engineers Phone 239-594-2021 Fax 239-594-2025 sf@humistonandmoore.com www.humistonandmoore.com From: McAlpinGary [mailto:GaryMcAlpin 5colliergov.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:36 PM To: Steve Foge Subject: Status of the Marco Island Central Beach regrade project Steve, What's the status of this project? Progress?? J dLr Hofo.'Law, t a l uod te_w.i:,0 ore public.;records If you do not wont year t_-mall address released in response to 3 pubtio records request, do of ow ri electronic rnaii to this entity. Instead.contact tnis office by telephone or 111 ,writing. CAC September 11,2014 VIII-1 New Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Work Order with Atkins North America, Inc. to provide professional engineering services to perform a design template Peer Review Analysis & Memorandum under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ for a Lump Sum amount not to exceed $17,082 (Project No. 90020); and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To provide peer review of the beach nourishment design methodology prepare for the County by Coastal Planning and Engineering. CONSIDERATIONS: Atkins will review the correspondence between Collier County, the Florida Department of Environmental Management (FDEM), and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding funding for beach restoration activities post Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. Atkins will review documentation prepared by Coastal Planning & Engineering (CP&E) in support of the funding request and write a memorandum that addresses the services, or collection of data, etc. This data/information will be provided to Atkins by the client and the peer review will include an evaluation of the methods/approach used for the post- storm analysis and funding request, and review of any assumptions used for completeness and acceptance in accordance with standard engineering principles and practices. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding is available through Tourist Development Tax, Fund 195 Project 195-90020. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:Ther e is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this item. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. —CMG RECOMMENDATION: To approve a Work Order with Atkins North America, Inc. to provide professional engineering services to perform a design template Peer Review Analysis & Memorandum under Contract No. 13-6164-CZ for a Lump Sum amount not to exceed $17,082 (Project No. 90020); and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared by: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachment: Proposal; WO; NTP; PO CAC September 11,2014 VIII-1 New Business 1 of 6 ATKINS Professional Engineering Services for Peer Review Services of FEMA Submittal for Collier Coastal Zone Management/ Contract Number 13-6164-CZ August 18,2014 v ATKINS is pleased to provide a scope of work for Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department The intention of this Work Assignment is to provide peer review of the beach nourishment design methodology prepared for the County by Coastal Planning and Engineering. In accordance with Collier County Contract Number 13-6164-CZ the following scope of work is presented herein. SCOPE OF SERVICES Atkins will review the correspondence between Collier County,the Florida Department of Environmental Management(FDEM),and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)regarding funding for beach restoration activities post Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma.Atkins will review documentation prepared by Coastal Planning and Engineering(CP&E)in support of the funding request. Documents include:Collier County Funding request to FDEM,dated February 2013,and other information that is relevant. Atkins will also use the results of the recently completed 2006-2014 County Coastal Historical Beach Analysis Report to evaluate the surveys,storm events and loss of beach width and volume.Atkins will review these documents provided by Collier County and write a memorandum that addresses the methods used and provides a review of our findings. This work assignment does not include design services,or collection of data,etc. This data/information will be provided to Atkins by the client and the peer review will include an evaluation of the methods/approach used for the post-storm analysis and funding request,and review of any assumptions used for completeness and acceptance in accordance with standard engineering principles and practices. The above analyses will provide a qualitative understanding of the current volumetric differences and the memorandum will be submitted as a bound printed document and on a disk in electronic.pdf format. Atkins will prepare for, travel to and attend one meeting to coordinate/present our findings with the County. One Atkins senior engineer will attend this meeting. Deliverables will include: 1) A detailed explanation of the total quantity of sand lost as a result of Hurricanes Katrina&Wilma and assessment of assumptions inherent in calculations by parties concerned. 2) Assumptions and calculations in documents provided by the client shall be reviewed to explain consolidation methodology rationale if supported. 3) Atkins will develop a chart/figure showing the volumetric losses per R-monument in order to visually depict the consolidation. 1 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-1 New Business 2 of 6 Budget Estimate Work for this assignment will be performed for the Jump sum amount of$17,082.00, Work will be billed to the County on a monthly basis based on the percentage of work completed for the preceding month. The budget breakdown per project area is as follows: Task 1 Collier County Beach Design Template Peer-Review Analysis&Memorandum $17,082.00 Total .$17,082.00 Schedule Estimate The following schedule of completion is anticipated. I. Submit draft reports within 60 calendar days following the Notice-to-Proceed and receipt of all required data(surveys)to complete analysis. Assumptions 1. All existing information/documentation including, but not limited to, survey data, project permits, environmental information, previous studies, CAD drawings and geotechnical information will be provided to Atkins by the County/CP&E. 2. This quote is based upon conversations with County Staff on August 12,2012. 3. No modeling analysis or design or preparation of documents will be generated from this peer-review. August 18,2014 Bryan D.Flynn Date Sr. Project Manager Atkins North America,Inc. 2 itiAtbrailtiddr41,084/e3 r- t VIII_rNew Business 3 of 6 WORK ORDERMURCHASE ORDER Contract 13-6164-CZ'Architect and Engineering" Contract Expiration Date: March 8,2019 This Work Order is for professional Engineering services for work known as: Collier County Beach Design Template Peer-Review Analysis&Memorandum Project Name:Collier County Beach Design Template Peer Review Project No: 195-90020 The work is specified in the proposal dated August 18,2014 which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In accordance with Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, this Work Order/Purchase Order is assigned to: Atkins North America,Inc. Scope of Work:, As detailed in the attached proposal and the following: * Task 1 Collier County Beach Design Template Peer-Review Analysis&Memorandum Schedule of Work; Complete work within 60 days from the date of the Notice to Proceed which is accompanying this Work Order. The ConAukant agrees that any Work Order that extends beyond the expiration date of Agreement # 13-6167-CZ will survive and remain subject to the terms and conditions of that Agreement until the completion or termination of this Work Order. Compensation: In accordance with the Agreement referenced above,the County will cpalpensate the Firm in accordance with following method(s): ONegotiated Lump Sum (NLS) Lump Sum Plus Reimbursable Costs (LS+RC) OTime& Material (T&M)(established hourly rate—Schedule A) Cost Plus Fixed Fee(CPFF), (define which method will be used for which tasks)as provided in the attached proposal. Task 1 $17,082.00 Lump Sum TOTAL FEE $17,082.00 Lump Sum PREPARED BY: ii11447 astvri, eitfir. a Mc 1pin,C anager Date APPROVED BY: 1 P 9,,o-zo4 lliarn Lor->, P merit Director Date "Iej\tiA APPROVED BY411111001P'74114 i‘kCi 24„ : 4,e. r 14, Ni sala guida, ' sion Administrator Date By the signature below, the Firm (including employees, officers and/or agents) certifies, and hereby discloses,that,to the best of their knowledge and belief,all relevant facts concerning past,present,or currently planned interest or activity (financial, contractual, organizational, or otherwise) which Page 1 of 2 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-1 New Business 4 of 6 relates to the proposed work; and bear on whether the Firm has a potential conflict have been fully disclosed. Additionally, the Firm agrees to notify the Procurement Director, in writing within 48 hours of learning of any actual or potential conflict of interest that arises during the Work Order and/or project duration. ACCEPTED BY: Atkins North America,Inc. if r /. 8 II C Bryan D.t'lynn, Project Mana:er Dat Page 2 of 2 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-1 New Business 5 of 6 C:le . .....co -I�''ity nisgeolAugust 22, 2014 Mr. Bryan Flynn Atkins North America, Inc 4030 West Boy Scout Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33607 RE: NOTICE-TO-PROCEED FOR: Beach Design Template Peer Review Work Order/PO 45-152330 Contract No. 13-6164-CZ Collier County Project No. 195-90020 Dear Mr. Flynn: This letter serves as Collier County's official NOTICE TO PROCEED (NTP) to your Company to commence with the above referenced project. This NTP is issued pursuant to Contract No. 13- 6164-CZ. The purchase order number is shown above and a copy of the P.O. is enclosed. This NTP is limited to the scope of work for: Beach Design Template Peer Review for Lump Sum Not to Exceed $17,082.00. Please include the purchase order number, contract number, rate sheet and project number on each invoice to facilitate the payment process. Please note "Final Invoice"when final invoice is submitted and include rate sheet when submitting each invoice. Please note the above referenced contract expiration date. Failure to request Change Orders in a timely manner will result in invoices past completion date to be rejected and re-submitted. If the completion date on this Work Order expires and the contract has also expired it will require BCC approval to extend your contract. Commencement date for the services associated herewith shall be considered to be August 22, 2014. Final completion of all work shall be considered to be October 21, 2014. If additional time is needed, please notify me before final completion date to avoid any rejection of invoices. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, !M arry McAlpin, P.E. CZM Manager CC: Clint Perryman, Project Manager Tara Castillo, Budget Analyst Adam Northrup, Procurement Strategist Bonnie Baer, Contracts Supervisory Coastal Zone Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Tel: 239-252-2966 Fax: 239-252-2950 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-1 New Business 6 of 6 Send all Invoices to: Collier County Board of County Commissioners ,1.1 rf Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department r Attn:Accounts Payable Phone:239-252-8407 '"fi 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Fax: 239-732-0844 r-, .; Naples FL 34112-5749 Tax Exempt:85-8015966531C-1 or.!:` OR email to:bccapclerkocollierclerk.com Purchase Order number must appear on all related correspondence,shipping papers and Invoices: Vendor it 102324 Purchase order ATKINS NORTH AMERICA INC PO Number 4500152330 Data 08/22/2014 4030 W BOYSCOUT BLVD,STE 700 Contact Person Coastal Zone Mang TAMPA FL 33607 Please deliver to: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISOIN P&R Delivery Date: 09/30/2014 COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT 2800 N HORESHOE DR NAPLES FL 34104 Terms of Payment Net 30 Days Currency USD item Material Description Order Qty Unit Price Per Unit Net Value 00010 CC BEACH DESIGN TEMPLATE PEER REVIEW 17,082 each 1.00 17,082.00 Release order against contract 4600003476 Item 00010 ANALYSIS&MEMORANDUM 13-6164 BCC APPR 02252014;16E5 Total net value excl.tax USD 17,082.00 VENDOR Terms and Conditions The VENDOR agrees to comply with all Purchase Order Terms and Conditions as outlined on the Collier County Purchasing Internet site: http://www.colliergov.net/lndex.aspx?page=762(revision date 01/22/2008),including delivery and payment terms.Further the VENDOR agrees to: 1. Provide goods and services outlined in this Purchase Order with the prices,terms,delivery method and specifications listed above. 2. Notify department Immediately if order fulfillment cannot occur as specified. 3. Send all invoices to: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Attn:Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Tr1 E Ste 700 Naples FL 34112-5749 OR email to:bccapclerk@collierclerk,com The Purchase Order is authorized under direction of Collier County Board of County Commissioners by: Joanne Markiewicz,General Services/Purchasing Director Printed 08/22/2014 @ 10:26:26 195-110406-631400-90020.1 Page 1 of 1 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-2 New Business 1 of 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Work Order with CB&I Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. to provide professional engineering services to support Collier County in preparation of a Second Appeal submittal to FEMA PW2700 deobligation for a time and material amount not to exceed $17,904, Project No. 90020 and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To provide professional engineering services in support of a second appeal submittal to the FEMA PW 2700 deobligation. CONSIDERATIONS: On August 1, 2014, Collier County received notice from the Florida Department of Emergency Management ("FDEM") that the County's First Appeal to the $11,172,272 deobligation of Hurricane Wilma-PW 2700 was approved in part and denied in part. FEMA reinstated $1,853,755.68 in expenses for soft costs such as dune repairs, engineering and surveys as outlined in the original Version 0 of PW 2700. However, FEMA failed to address the County's argument concerning the application of additional sand quantities needed following the sand loss after Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma and denied reinstatement for that portion of the deobligated funds. In addition, FEMA failed to include all of the environmental monitoring costs required as part of the beach restoration project. Outside counsel, Ernest Abbott with the law firm Baker Donelson, Bearman, Caldewll & Berkowitz, P.C., believes that there is a reasonable chance of receiving a significantly increased reimbursement of the remaining deobligated funds and recommends filing the Second Appeal. See Mr. Abbott's Attached August 26, 2014, Memorandum. It is also Mr. Abbott's opinion that because the reinstatement of the $1,853,755.68 in deobligated funds was to correct a FEMA error, those funds should not be in jeopardy by pursuing a Second Appeal. The legal costs to pursue the $9.2 million by filing a Second Appeal is estimated to cost less than$50,000. The County must file its appeal with FDEM no later than September 30,2014. At Mr. Abbott's suggestion, the Division of Growth Management (Department of Natural Resources) is also requesting authorization to allow a peer review be conducted on the original CP&E technical sand analysis with the objective of strengthening and justifying the technical discussion. County staff will work with the County Attorney's Office, outside legal counsel and the County's consultants to integrate this additional analysis into a comprehensive appeal document. FISCAL IMPACT: Initial funding of $100,000 was approved on the September 11, 2012 BCC meeting (Item 11H). Approximately $26,000 of the original $100,000 remains uncommitted. Staff is anticipating an additional $86,000 in legal and engineering expenses to finalize a second appeal (legal expenses of $50,000 and engineering expenses of $36,000). A budget amendment of approximately $60,000 will be processed from TDC Fund 195 reserves to provide for this effort. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:Ther e is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. CAC September 11,2014 VIII-2 New Business 2 of 2 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The CAC may make a recommendation to the TDC and Board of County Commissioners. The CAC recommendation must include a finding as to whether this expenditure promotes tourism. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval.—CMG RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve a Work Order with CB&I Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. to provide professional engineering services to support Collier County in preparation of a Second Appeal submittal to FEMA PW2700 deobligation for a time and material amount not to exceed $17,904, Project No. 90020 and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared by: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachment: Proposal CAC September 11,2014 VIII-2 New Business 1 of 6 CB&I Coastal Planning &Engineering, Inc. 2481 NW Boca Raton Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33431 Tel: +1 561 391 8102 C1EI Fax: +1 561 391 9116 www.CBI.com August 28, 2014 Gary McAlpin, Director Collier County Coastal Zone Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Collier County FEMA Response Assistance (Contract No. 13-6164-CZ "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering") Dear Gary: This letter is a proposal for hourly services for CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CB&I) to perform staff engineering tasks under the above referenced contract, to support the County during the FEMA appeal. CB&I will provide data, technical assistance, and provide historical perspective on the Collier County beach nourishment program in support of the County's response to FEMA's August 1, 2014 letter. The County's response is against the de-obligation of FEMA funding. Various methods to address FEMA's concerns were discusged by the County, CB&I, Atkins and Baker Donnellson during the August 21, 2014 conference call. Atkins and Baker Donnellson are leading the data review and composing the response to FEMA; CS&I's efforts will be in support of the County and these two firms. A senior coastal engineer familiar with the history of Collier's beach nourishment program will travel to Washington, D.C. with County,vgpresentatives to present Collier's case to FEMA. A fee proposal is included Exhibit A, and the rate schedule is provided as Exhibit B. The cost with time and materials is not t exceed $17,904. All work will be completed within 60 days of receiving the Notice to Proceed. The FEMA visit will occur when scheduled by the County. Very truly yours, i! St-•j- Keehn, P.E. Senior Coastal Engineer CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. ----)1/1'‘ c---- ---)____________ Authorized Corporate Signature 7774iv,s P e(rig Printed Name (r.ec,"O✓ Title CAC September 11,2014 VIII-2 New Business 2 of 6 C , . 13 cc: Gail Hambright, Collier County Government Tara Brenner, P.G., CB&I Thomas P. Pierro, P.E., CB&I Confidentiality Statement The information contained in this proposal is confidential commercial information and shall not be disclosed, except for evaluation purposes, provided that if a contract is awarded to C8&l Environmental& Infrastructure, Inc. as a result of or in connection with the submission of this proposal, the requester shall have the right to use or disclose the data to the extent provided in the contract. This restriction does not limit the requestor's right to use or disclose any technical data obtained from another source without restriction. CAC September 11,2014 VIII-2 New Business 3 of 6 CIII Exhibit A Fee Proposal z ) ) ~ ^ - - $ Ct / I { k k < £ ^~ Q & csj 0) /\ o , _ & )/c} 0 •` ° / / / It )/) = § } CV 0 § & - II Tr t \ - N CO q \ { ) CO a§ § - ° O CO 0 i Tr ; }] _ § 0g /2 a ) $ / !\ I § 2582 ( & § - z xmau � ,e la II.Ir6- _ \ � § 0 _ _ LL \\ o 72 \ oF.{ k E of co a < ! V- 013 k 0 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-2 New Business 5 of 6 • Exhibit B Rate Schedule CAC September 11,2014 VIII-2 New Business 6of6 Exhibit C SCHEDULE B: RATE SCHEDULE Standard Hourly Title Rate Principal $ 206.00 Senior Project Manager $ 172.00 Project Manager $ 147.00 Senior Engineer $ 157.00 Engineer $ 123.00 Senior Inspector $ 96.00 Inspector $ 76.00 Senior Planner $ 139.00 Planner $ 110.00 Senior Designer $ 114.00 Designer $ 94.00 Environmental Specialist $ 109.00 Senior Environmental Specialist $ 134.00 Scientist/Geologist $ 93.00 Senior Scientist/Geologist $ 118.00 Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 110.00 Senior Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $ 139.00 GIS Specialist $ 102.00 Clerical/Administrative $ 62.00 Senior Technician $ 85.00 Technician $ 72.00 Surveyor and Mapper $ 120.00 CADD Technician $ 81.00 Survey Crew-2 man $ 130.00 Survey Crew-3 man $ 161.00 Survey Crew-4 man $ 189.00 Senior Architect $ 154.00 Architect $ 121.00 This list is not intended to be all inclusive. Hourly rates for other categories of professional, support and other services shall be mutually negotiated by Collier County and firm on a project by project basis as needed. B-1 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Work Order with CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. to provide professional engineering Peer Reviews Contract No. 13-6164-CZ for a Time and Material amount not to exceed $21,916 (Project No. 80165); approve necessary budget amendment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To perform two (2) peer reviews for Collier County's Coastal Zone Management department for Wiggins Pass monitoring and Historical Beach Data review. CONSIDERATIONS: CB&I services are being obtained to perform two (2) peer reviews; Wiggins Pass monitoring and Historical Beach Data report review 2003 to 2014. The 2014 Wiggins Pass Monitoring Report will be utilized by FDEP to set future sand bypassing quantities and locations for Wiggins Pass. The Historical Beach Report is a multi-year report outlining condition and results of previous beach renourishment and bypassing activities. FISCAL IMPACT: A budget amendment will be necessary for Funding in Tourist Development Tax, Fund 195 Project 80165. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:Ther e is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this item. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. —CMG RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve a Work Order with CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. to provide professional engineering Peer Reviews Contract No. 13- 6164-CZ for a Time and Material amount not to exceed $21,916 (Project No. 80165); approve necessary budget amendment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared by: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachment: CP&E Proposal dated July 28, 2014 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 8 CB&I Coastal Planning &En ineerinif n, Inc. 2481 NW Boca RatonBlvd, Boca Raton, FL 33431 Tel:+1 561 391 8102 CBI Fax: +1 561 391 9116 www.CBI.com August 28, 2014 Gary McAlpin, Director Collier County Coastal Zone Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Engineering Peer Reviews (Contract No. 13-6164-CZ "Professional Services: Architect and Engineering") Dear Gary: This proposal is for hourly services for CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CB&I) to perform two (2) peer reviews for Collier County's Coastal Zone Management department under the terms of the above-referenced Contract. CB&I engineers will prepare two (2) brief letter reports summarizing the findings of the peer reviews described in Exhibit A and attend two (2) meetings at the County office to discuss the results. A scope of work is included as Exhibit A, the fee proposal is included as Exhibit B, and the rate schedule is provided as Exhibit C. The cost with time and materials is not to exceed $21,916. Very truly yours, ' AD Keehn, P.E. Seni. oastal Engineer CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. cc: Gail Hambright, Collier County Government Tara Brenner, P.G., CB&I Thomas P. Pierro, P.E., CB&I Authorized_-� Corporates Signature /rlcl6Y67 Printed Name Title CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 2 of 8 Bi Exhibit A Scope of Work CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 3 of 8 Exhibit A Engineering Peer Reviews Collier County, Florida Scope of Work This scope of work details the tasks necessary to conduct two (2) peer reviews for Collier County's Coastal Zone Management department. CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (CB&I) will prepare two (2) brief letter reports summarizing the findings of the peer reviews described below and attend two (2) meetings at the County office to discuss the results. All work will be complete and submitted to the County within 120 days of receiving the Notice to Proceed, contingent upon receipt of the reports no later than 60 days after the Notice to Proceed. Historical Analyses (1997-2005 & 2005-2014) CB&I will conduct a peer review of Atkins' two historical analysis reports (1995 to 2005 and 2005 to 2013). The review will focus on the report's consistency, completeness and adequacy for illustrating long term trends. The historical analyses conducted by Atkins cover two time periods, which include major beach nourishments, minor nourishments constructed by truck haul and sand bypassing at inlets, storms and other major influences. During the review, CB&I will compare the Atkins trend analysis against known milestones of the Collier County Beach Program and confirm or identify significant events illustrated by the data. CB&I will supplement Atkins' observations with pertinent comments where appropriate, including suggestions to improve the analysis where supported by the results. CB&I will prepare a letter report summarizing the findings and observations of the historical analysis peer reviews and attend one (1) meeting to provide the results to Collier County's Coastal Zone Manager. This peer review includes only the comments and calculations described above. Otherwise, no calculations, tables or figures will be redone or created for the peer review letter report. Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement Project 1-Year Monitoring CB&I will conduct a peer review of the results of the 1-year post-construction physical monitoring of Wiggins Pass conducted by Atkins. CB&I will base the review on standards described in the physical monitoring plan (CPE, June 2012) and the "Engineering Report of an Inlet Management Study in Support of Maintenance Dredging, Navigation Improvement and Erosion Reduction Project for Wiggins Pass" (CPE, January 2012). The management concepts in these reports have received at least verbal approval from FDEP. CB&I will focus on the following: a. Review completeness based on monitoring plan requirements. b. Identify or confirm pertinent observations of the pass' performance. c. Review that the tables, figures and major observations and conclusions are consistent and realistic. CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 4 of 8 d. Calculate the 2001 to 2014 volume changes between R-12 and R-21 and compare the volumes to the volume changes since February 2013 (the latest pre-construction survey). e. Review or estimate future dredging volumes at 2-year and 4-year post-construction based on results in the monitoring report. f. Update the 10-Year Dredge Plan Volumes in Table 17 of the 2012 engineering reports based on the description in paragraph VIII B Mitigation and Sand Bypassing. The updated table will provide an initial estimate of dredge volumes and disposal locations of the 2-year and/or 4-year dredging events. g. Provide a method and example for updating this plan with each future monitoring report and before each major dredging event. CB&I will prepare a letter report summarizing the findings and observations of the Wiggins Pass peer review and attend one (1) meeting to provide the results to Collier County's Coastal Zone Manager. This peer review includes only the comments and calculation described above. Otherwise, no calculation, tables or figures will be redone or created for the peer review report. Confidentiality Statement The information contained in this proposal is confidential commercial information and shall not be disclosed, except for evaluation purposes, provided that if a contract is awarded to CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. as a result of or in connection with the submission of this proposal, the requester shall have the right to use or disclose the data to the extent provided in the contract. This restriction does not limit the requestor's right to use or disclose any technical data obtained from another source without restriction. CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 5 of 8 • d Exhibit B Fee Proposal A O O 0 r- .- N .- N I- f9 69 CO O N O N C _ N ID D 0 7 N CO rn rn m N 6- co N N V O to N 3 S of a CD EZ CD M E._ N In > N V I+ N N Oj V U 2 to or Q 0 N O N CO N O _ 69 C1 E.3 U) C O.c CO Lo W CO W CDD GJ 8 S t9 F ai a) '°---", — N C ) n C O N O N I'''' ug 'O 0 CO CO r M - C O = f9 - W U U) o a` o ° N I,- O nv 'G C N CD 61. N 0 N c 5 O N V N N C O = 69 ID u W U » rc a m O tn., O N CD •EN 3 y OC O N t+) r N Iv re D to a of m 2 r9 .1' 5 a o F LL �p mv Q LL N r O II II II et m a � N cO N- O) rn g t y = pa o)c ` w o ,- a' cU C c = I v W d•1 y p 7 rn 0 N _ W •C U Q 1O- 'C, I LL C U / W f9 t9 U 1 'g a LL CC C E •- Y d O - 2, a ~ C N Q ca A a u c o 'a) � rn •x 3 0 w o 0 a;i m Q > '—> r CL z 0 I- d d d a a -- N Y Y cif N H W HR CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 7 of 8 Exhibit C Rate Schedule CAC September 11,2014 VIII-3 New Business 8of8 Exhibit C SCHEDULE B: RATE SCHEDULE Standard Hourly Title Rate Principal $ 206.00 Senior Project Manager $ 172.00 Project Manager $ 147.00 Senior Engineer $ 157.00 Engineer $ 123.00 Senior Inspector $ 96.00 Inspector $ 76.00 Senior Planner $ 139.00 Planner $ 110.00 Senior Designer $ 114.00 Designer $ 94.00 Environmental Specialist $ 109.00 Senior Environmental Specialist $ 134.00 Scientist/Geologist $ 93.00 Senior Scientist/Geologist $ 118.00 Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 110.00 Senior Marine Biologist/Hydrogeologist $ 138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $ 139.00 GIS Specialist $ 102.00 Clerical/Administrative $ 62.00 Senior Technician $ 85.00 Technician $ 72.00 Surveyor and Mapper $ 120.00 CADD Technician $ 81.00 Survey Crew-2 man $ 130.00 Survey Crew-3 man $ 161.00 Survey Crew-4 man $ 189.00 Senior Architect $ 154.00 Architect $ 121.00 This list is not intended to be all inclusive. Hourly rates for other categories of professional, support and other services shall be mutually negotiated by Collier County and firm on a project by project basis as needed. B-1 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 1 of 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Contract No. 14-6257 to provide professional engineering services as required by the Doctors Pass Jetty and Erosion Control Project for $148,266 to Humiston and Moore Engineers, process all required budget amendments, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: To obtain professional engineering services to engineer, design and obtain a Notice to Proceed as required to execute the rebuild of the South Doctors Pass Jetty and Erosion Control Project. CONSIDERATIONS: This project consists of professional services required to restore the south Jetty to original design conditions and the design and permitting of an additional erosion control structure(s)to reduce downdrift beach erosion on the south side of the inlet. The south jetty of Doctors Pass has suffered significant deterioration over the past 20+years and requires rebuilding to the original design conditions to restore its functionality. The beach immediately south of Doctors Pass is consistently the most severely eroded of all beaches within the County. An Erosion Control structure is required to reduce the rate of sand loss from the beaches within the influence of Doctors Pass on the downdrift south side of the inlet. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the proposed work order is included in the budget; Tourist Development Tax Fund (195). This is a non-grant project. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There are no Growth Management Impacts as a result of this project at this time. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this item. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Contract No. 14-6257 to provide professional engineering services as required by the Doctors Pass Jetty and Erosion Control Project for $148,266 to Humiston and Moore Engineers, process all required budget amendments, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. Prepared by: J. Gary McAlpin, PE Coastal Zone Management Manager of the Natural Resources Department Attachments: (1) Contract No. 14-6257; (2) Humiston and Moore proposal CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 1 of 7 Doctors Pass South Jetty Restoration and Erosion Control Prepared by Humiston&Moore Engineers ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK DOCTORS PASS JETTY&EROSION CONTROL CONTRACT 14-6257 7-28-14 The following is a scope of services for the design and permitting of an erosion control project immediately south of Doctors Pass in Collier County, FL. The project consists of restoration of the south Jetty and design and permitting of additional erosion control structure(s) to reduce the downdrift beach erosion on the south side of the inlet. In all cases, County refers to Collier County, City refers to the City of Naples, DEP refers to Department of Environmental Protection, USACE refers to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Engineer refers to Humiston & Moore Engineers. 1.0 Background Review& Preliminary Design 1.1 Compile Existing Data Engineer will utilize existing beach profile data, engineering, environmental and inlet studies to evaluate the past shoreline and nearshore trends in the vicinity of the inlet and project area. Historic shoreline and nearshore volumetric changes will be evaluated as supporting documentation to establish nearshore trends and local sediment budget. This review will include shoreline and inlet monitoring reports, available county data and reports, DEP files and database, and supporting documentation and surveys from the previous permits authorized by the DEP in this project area. The effects of existing erosion control structures will be documented and evaluated to develop an understanding of the beach and inlet system. Engineer will coordinate with the county, city, state, and federal resource agencies to tabulate details of sea turtle monitoring and shorebird monitoring data in the project vicinity. 1.2 Additional data collection: An updated natural resource survey will be conducted in the vicinity of the anticipated work area for the project. A detailed survey of the existing south jetty will be done to develop an existing representative surface of the structure. 1.3 Regional Circulation, Inlet and Beach Morphology Modeling: Several computer modeling tools will be applied in the preliminary and final design stages of this project.The engineering evaluation will consider inlet dynamics, background erosion rates and nearshore coastal process modeling. The nearshore wave climate will be generated using offshore wave data from the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Wave Watch III database and regional wave modeling. Page 1 of 6 C:\Users\hambright_g\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\LFAQVHF8\24-018- Doctor's Pass-Design and Permitting SOW-7-28-14.docx CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 2 of 7 Doctors Pass South Jetty Restoration and Erosion Control Prepared by Humiston&Moore Engineers Evaluation of nearshore wave and flow conditions in the vicinity of the project areas will be conducted using regional and nearshore coastal process models developed by the USACE and accepted by DEP and the USACE. Modeling applications with updated hydrographic monitoring data using the Coastal Modeling System (CMS) will evaluate inlet dynamics, nearshore flow, sediment pathways, and morphology changes. CMS will also be used for the purpose of evaluating design alternatives. Shoreline change modeling will be used to project the long-term response to the installation of the erosion control structure(s) and provide estimates of potential salient configurations within the project area. These results will be used in establishing an improved sediment budget and will also be considered in evaluating the project life of ongoing beach fill programs including sand placement from future maintenance dredging of Doctors Pass. Preliminary design and projected impact analysis will be coordinated with the County staff for acceptance. 1.4 Alternatives Analysis: Through the modeling listed above, preliminary design alternatives will be developed. Preliminary design will include evaluation of shoreline response and projected design life of the beach fill. Through an iterative process, two different configurations of erosion control structures will be evaluated using the modeling approach discussed above. The intent of this procedure is to adjust positioning of a segmented breakwater structure and a T-groin field to obtain optimum results for shoreline protection and for minimization of impacts to the adjacent shorelines. We anticipate that the two erosion control design alternatives to be considered will consist of a rock mound segmented breakwater and/or T- groins. When evaluating these alternatives, relative opinions of cost, permitability, and practicality from a construction and engineering design perspective will be considered. Relative performance evaluation of the alternatives will be reviewed. 1.5 Preliminary Design Report: Upon acceptance of the preliminary design and impact analysis, engineer shall prepare a preliminary design report for use as supporting documentation for County, City, State and Federal regulatory review. The report will include background shoreline trends, design objectives and coastal process modeling for evaluation of the project design and projected nearshore and adjacent shoreline changes. This report will include plans for the county to review and approve for filing with the City, State and Federal regulatory agencies. This report will also include a preliminary opinion of probable costs by engineer. 1.6 Local Meetings: Engineer will assist the county on an as-needed basis and attend up to two meetings with the Moorings Bay Taxing District, two meetings with the City in support of the request for a letter of local comprehensive plan consistency. Engineer Page 2 of 6 C:\Users\hambright_g\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\LFAQVHF8\24-018- Doctor's Pass-Design and Permitting SOW-7-28-14.docx CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 3 of 7 Doctors Pass South Jetty Restoration and Erosion Control Prepared by Humiston& Moore Engineers will provide supporting design and permitting progress documentation to the county and attend up to six progress meetings including Coastal Advisory Committee meetings and Board of County Commission meetings at the request of the County. 2.0 Task 2-STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITTING 2.1 Pre-application Meeting: The results of the modeling, alternatives analysis and preliminary design will be summarized in a PowerPoint presentation that will be filed initially with the County. Upon acceptance the presentation will be forwarded to DEP Division of Water Resource Management, and the USACE staff in advance of pre-application meetings. The purpose of the PowerPoint presentation is to facilitate distribution of project information for effective meetings with the state and federal agencies. Within approximately 30 days after filing of the PowerPoint presentation, a pre-application meeting will be held in Tallahassee with the DEP and County. Staff of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission will be invited to the meeting. Following the state pre-application meeting, a second meeting will be held at the USACE Jacksonville District Ft. Myers office, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service will be invited to attend. The results of the meetings will be summarized and distributed to the attendees of both meetings and referenced in the JCP application. 2.2 Preparation of JCP Submittal to DEP, Supporting Documentation, Permit Plans, Reports, and Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) from DEP An application will be filed with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) under the Joint Coastal Permitting program. The submittal will include permit drawings for the proposed restoration of the south Jetty and construction of an erosion control structure(s) to reduce the rate of sand loss from the beaches within the influence of Doctors Pass on the downdrift south side of the inlet. The submittal will also include a technical coastal engineering design analysis report, a QA/QC plan for the construction, a resource survey of the project area of work, a monitoring plan based on the pre-application meetings with DEP and USACE, and submerged land public easement surveys for anticipated Consent of Use authorization from the Board of Trustees. Engineer will encourage a site meeting with the DEP staff and FWC to allow for evaluation of existing conditions and natural resources. Requests for Additional Information (RAI): Engineer shall coordinate with County to prepare response to RAls generated by DEP and their resource agency, FWC. Engineer shall utilize available data from the city and county environmental staff and monitoring data from other erosion control project installations in southwest and central Florida when addressing environmental issues. Page 3 of 6 C:\Users\hambright_g\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\LFAQVHF8\24-018- Doctor's Pass-Design and Permitting SOW-7-28-14.docx CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 4 of 7 Doctors Pass South Jetty Restoration and Erosion Control Prepared by Humiston&Moore Engineers DEP QA/QC Plan Update: Engineer will evaluate and update the QA/QC plan format last used by the Department for this section of the shoreline and similar work. Engineer will coordinate with regulatory staff to accommodate any recent changes in regulatory policy. Monitoring Plan: As part of the permit processing and coordination with the DEP and the USACE, a monitoring plan will be prepared based on input from the resource agencies. This monitoring effort will track the performance of the project as well as any impacts on listed species. A monitoring plan will be developed for this specific project for a 3-year period with the intent that in the long term the survey requirements may be reduced and incorporated into the county's beach and inlet monitoring programs. 2.3 Federal Permitting— USACE: A copy of the JCP application will be forwarded to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for their processing of an Individual Permit. This will include coordination with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the NOAA Protected Resources Division (PRD), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Engineer will encourage an on-site meeting with the USACE and federal resource agencies to present the project and allow for on-site evaluation of the project and natural resources. Requests for Additional Information (RAI) for federal permitting: Engineer shall coordinate with the design team and County to prepare responses to RAIs generated by USACE and their resource agencies, FWS, PRD, and NMFS. It has been common for erosion control structures to require the need for individual Biological Opinions. Should the coordination with the federal resource agencies result in the need for a project specific Biological Opinion, Engineer shall coordinate with the design team and work with the resource agency and assist in the preparation of the project specific Biological Opinion. One more recent issue with the FWS may be the upcoming listing of the Red Knot shorebird as a federally threatened species. This task would include an on-site meeting and coordination with the USACE reviewer during the process. All meetings will be coordinated with county staff. The NOAA PRD is currently backlogged and can add 6 months to the permit processing period. Engineer shall utilize available data from the city and county environmental staff and monitoring data from other erosion control project installations in southwest and central Florida when addressing environmental issues. Permit Processing Fee(s): All application fees will be filed by the County as part of this scope of this work. Page 4 of 6 C:\Users\hambright_g\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\LFAQVHF8\24-018- Doctor's Pass-Design and Permitting SOW-7-28-14.docx CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 5 of 7 Doctors Pass South Jetty Restoration and Erosion Control Prepared by Humiston& Moore Engineers 3.0 FINALIZE PLANS AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 Plans and Specifications: Finalize design and prepare Technical Specifications and a bid schedule to be included with the County contract documents for bidding. An updated survey of the project area will be necessary to complete the construction plans as part of this task. The most recent survey from the on-going monitoring will be used in the preparation of the permit plans. An updated detailed survey to match the monitoring requirements for the project will be conducted within 6 months of the anticipated commencement of construction. This will be necessary for accurate computation of material quantities for the project and to establish the preconstruction condition for the project as well. 3.2 Opinion of Costs: Prepare a preliminary opinion of probable costs based on the final design. Contact other local governments for recent costs for similar construction. Contact suppliers and contractors for material sources and costs. 3.3 Pre-Bid Conference: Respond to inquiries from potential bidders and attend a pre- bid conference and site visit with representatives of the County, City and prospective bidders. 3.4 Addenda to Bid Package: Preparation of addenda to bid documents and responses to requests for information from prospective Bidders at the request of the County on an as needed basis. 3.5 Bid Qualification: Evaluate bidders' qualifications, contact references, and prepare a formal recommendation to the County regarding awarding of the construction contract. 4.0 Construction Phase Services Professional Services for construction phase including construction observation, and any pre and post monitoring requirements will be determined upon determination of the final design and state and federal permits and related conditions. (End Scope of Services) These services will be billed on a time and materials basis. Subconsultant surveying services for hydrographic and SAV surveys will be billed on a lump sum basis. Page 5 of 6 C:\Users\hambright_g\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\LFAQVHF8\24-018- Doctor's Pass-Design and Permitting SOW-7-28-14.docx CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 6 of 7 Doctors Pass South Jetty Restoration and Erosion Control Prepared by Humiston& Moore Engineers This Scope of Work does not include construction phase services and monitoring details and costs as they are unknown at this time. Permit and design will rely on existing hydrographic and environmental monitoring data on file with the county. Estimated time frame for design and permitting is 12 to 18 months. Construction will need to consider environmental window and permit conditions and should be able to be completed within 6 to 12 months following issuance of the state and federal permits. The costs associated with this scope of work have been prepared with the assumption that the state and federal agencies will accept the addition of erosion control improvements south of Doctors Pass. In many cases there exists resistance on behalf of the state and federal agencies when considering the introduction of erosion control structures. However, regulatory permits have been obtained for erosion control projects downdrift of inlets in southwest Florida, and the monitoring programs from these installations will be presented as additional support for this project. Page 6 of 6 C:\Users\hambright_g\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\LFAQVHF8\24-018- Doctor's Pass-Design and Permitting SOW-7-28-14.docx CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business Doctors Pass South Jetty Erosion Control Structure 7 of 7 Prepared by Humiston Moore Engineers July 28,2014 _ Date:July 28, 2014 Doctors Pass Jetty&Erosion Control Tasks Budget 1-Background Review&Preliminary Design $76,558 1.1 Compile Existing Data 1.2 Additional Data Collection _ 1.3 Regional Circulation, Inlet and Beach Morphology Modeling 1.4 Alternatives Analysis 1.5 Preliminary Design Report 1.6 Local Meetings 2-State and Federal Permitting $54,848 2.1 Pre-application meetings 2.2 Prepare JCP Submittal,supporting documentation, plans, reports, RAI 2.3 Federal Permitting-USACE 3-Finalize Plans,Specs,Bidding,Opinion of Costs $16,860 3.1 Construction Plans,Technical Specs and Updated survey 3.2 Opinion of Costs 3.3 Pre-Bid Conference 3.4 Addenda to Bid Package 3.5 Bid Qualification Total: $148.266 Note: Construction Phase Services unknown at this time Summary Breakdown of Costs RATE/UNI- HOURS/C COST MARKUP AMOUNT Principle Engineer 206 142 $29,252 Senior Engineer 157 250 $39,250 Project Manager 147 0 $0 Engineer 123 0 $0 Senior Designer 114 102 $11,628 Designer 94 220 $20,680 Senior Technician 85 262 $22,270 Inspector 76 0 $0 Technician _ 72 186 $13,392 Cadd Technician 81 20 $1,620 Clerical/Administrative, 62 2 $124 _ PLOTTING, BOND $0 PLOTTING,VELLUM $0 EXPENSE surveys&Env $10,050 $10,050 EXPENSE $0 Project Total: $148.26Q CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 1 of 23 Contract# 14-6257 "Engineering Services for Doctors Pass Jetty" PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2014 by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY" or "OWNER") and Humiston & Moore Engineers, P.A., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 5679 Strand Court, Naples, FL 34110 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the OWNER desires to obtain the professional Consulting services of the CONSULTANT concerning Engineering Services for Doctors Pass Jetty (hereinafter referred to as the "Project"), said services being more fully described in Schedule A, "Scope of Services", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein; WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal for provision of those services; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be required for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and provisions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITY 1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER professional Engineering Consulting services in all phases of the Project to which this Agreement applies. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 1 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 2of23 1.2. The Basic Services to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder are set forth in the Scope of Services described in detail in Schedule A. The total compensation to be paid CONSULTANT by the OWNER for all Basic Services is set forth in Article Five and Schedule B, "Basis of Compensation", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. 1.3. The CONSULTANT agrees to obtain and maintain throughout the period of this Agreement all such licenses as are required to do business in the State of Florida and in Collier County, Florida, including, but not limited to, all licenses required by the respective state boards and other governmental agencies responsible for regulating and licensing the professional services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement. 1.4. The CONSULTANT agrees that, when the services to be provided hereunder relate to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization or other form of legal entitlement to practice such services, it shall employ and/or retain only qualified personnel to provide such services to OWNER. 1.5. CONSULTANT designates Brett D. Moore, PE, a qualified licensed professional to serve as the CONSULTANT'S project coordinator (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Coordinator"). The Project Coordinator is authorized and responsible to act on behalf of the CONSULTANT with respect to directing, coordinating and administering all aspects of the services to be provided and performed under this Agreement. Further, the Project Coordinator has full authority to bind and obligate the CONSULTANT on all matters arising out of or relating to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the Project Coordinator shall devote whatever time is required to satisfactorily manage the services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder. The Project Coordinator shall not be removed by CONSULTANT from the Project without OWNER'S prior written approval, and if so removed must be immediately replaced with a person acceptable to OWNER. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 2 • CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 3of23 1.6. CONSULTANT agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a written request from Owner to promptly remove and replace the Project Coordinator, or any other personnel employed or retained by the CONSULTANT, or any subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or subcontractors engaged by the CONSULTANT to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, said request may be made with or without cause. Any personnel so removed must be immediately replaced with a person acceptable to OWNER. 1.7. The CONSULTANT represents to the OWNER that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be performed pursuant to this Agreement and has extensive experience with projects similar to the Project required hereunder. The CONSULTANT agrees that all services to be provided by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the OWNER'S review and approval and shall be in accordance with the generally accepted standards of professional practice in the State of Florida, as well as in accordance with all applicable laws, statutes, including but not limited to the Local Government Prompt Payment Act (218.735 and 218.76 F.S.), as amended, the Florida Public Records Law Chapter 119 (including specifically those contractual requirements at F.S. § 119.0701(2)(a)-(d) and (3)), ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and requirements of any governmental agencies, and the Florida Building Code where applicable, which regulate or have jurisdiction over the Project or the services to be provided and performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. In the event of any conflicts in these requirements, the CONSULTANT shall notify the OWNER of such conflict and utilize its best professional judgment to advise OWNER regarding resolution of each such conflict. OWNER'S approval of the design documents in no way relieves CONSULTANT of its obligation to deliver complete and accurate documents necessary for successful construction of the Project. 1.7.1 The County reserves the right to deduct portions of the (monthly) invoiced (task) amount for the following: Tasks not completed within the expressed time frame, including required deliverables, incomplete and/or deficient documents, failure to comply with local, state [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 3 CA CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 4 of 23 and/or federal requirements and/or codes and ordinances applicable to Consultant's performance of the work as related to the project. This list is not deemed to be all-inclusive, and the County reserves the right to make sole determination regarding deductions. After notification of deficiency, if the Consultant fails to correct the deficiency within the specified timeframe, these funds would be forfeited by the Consultant. The County may also deduct or charge the Consultant for services and/or items necessary to correct the deficiencies directly related to the Consultant's non-performance whether or not the County obtained substitute performance. 1.8. CONSULTANT agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third person, firm or organization, without OWNER'S prior written consent, or unless incident to the proper performance of the CONSULTANT'S obligations hereunder, or in the course of judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed, any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder, and CONSULTANT shall require all of its employees, agents, subconsultants and subcontractors to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. CONSULTANT shall provide OWNER prompt written notice of any such subpoenas. 1.9 As directed by OWNER, all plans and drawings referencing a specific geographic area must be submitted in an AutoCAD DWG or MicroStation DGN format on a CD or DVD, drawn in the Florida State Plane East (US Feet) Coordinate System (NAD 83/90). The drawings should either reference specific established Survey Monumentation, such as Certified Section Corners (Half or Quarter Sections are also acceptable), or when implemented, derived from the RTK(Real-Time Kinematic) GPS Network as provided by OWNER. Information layers shall have common naming conventions (i.e. right-of-way- ROW, centerlines - CL, edge-of-pavement- EOP, etc), and adhere to industry standard CAD specifications. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1) 4 C',9 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 5 of 23 ARTICLE TWO ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT If authorized in writing by OWNER through a Change Order to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in Article Two herein. The agreed upon scope, compensation and schedule for Additional Services shall be set forth in the Amendment authorizing those Additional Services. With respect to the individuals with authority to authorize Additional Services under this Agreement, such authority will be as established in OWNER'S Purchasing Ordinance and Procedures in effect at the time such services are authorized. These services will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Article Five and Schedule B. Except in an emergency endangering life or property, any Additional Services must be approved in writing via an Amendment to this Agreement prior to starting such services. OWNER will not be responsible for the costs of Additional Services commenced without such express prior written approval. Failure to obtain such prior written approval for Additional Services will be deemed: (i) a waiver of any claim by CONSULTANT for such Additional Services and (ii) an admission by CONSULTANT that such Work is not additional but rather a part of the Basic Services required of CONSULTANT hereunder. If OWNER determines that a change in the Agreement is required because of the action taken by CONSULTANT in response to an emergency, an Amendment shall be issued to document the consequences of the changes or variations, provided that CONSULTANT has delivered written notice to OWNER of the emergency within forty-eight (48) hours from when CONSULTANT knew or should have known of its occurrence. Failure to provide the forty-eight (48) hour written notice noted above, waives CONSULTANT'S right it otherwise may have had to seek an adjustment to its compensation or time of performance under this Agreement. The following services, if not otherwise specified in Schedule A as part of Basic Services, shall be Additional Services: li 2.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (except those already to be furnished under this Agreement) for private or governmental grants, loans, bond issues or advances in connection with the Project. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/11 5 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 6of23 2.2. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER'S schedule or character of construction; and revising studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents previously accepted by OWNER when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to and not reasonably anticipated prior to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond CONSULTANT'S control and fault. 2.3 Providing renderings or models for OWNER'S use. 2.4 Investigations and studies involving detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; and evaluating processes available for licensing and assisting OWNER in obtaining such process licensing. 2.5. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than the Basic Services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder. 2.6. Services during travel outside of Collier and Lee Counties required of CONSULTANT and directed by OWNER, other than visits to the Project site or OWNER's office. 2.7 Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals, except as otherwise provided for herein. 2.8. Preparing to serve or serving as a CONSULTANT or witness for OWNER in any litigation, or other legal or administrative proceeding, involving the Project (except for assistance in consultations which are included as part of the Basic Services to be provided herein). CA [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 6 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 7 of 23 2.9 Additional services rendered by CONSULTANT in connection with the Project, not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in Collier County as part of the Basic Services in accordance with generally accepted professional practice. ARTICLE THREE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. The OWNER shall designate in writing a project manager to act as OWNER'S representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall have authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER'S policies and decisions with respect to CONSULTANT'S services for the Project. However, the Project Manager is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to the CONSULTANT that would have the effect, or be interpreted to have the effect, of modifying or changing in any way whatever: (a) The scope of services to be provided and performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder; (b) The time the CONSULTANT is obligated to commence and complete all such services; or (c) The amount of compensation the OWNER is obligated or committed to pay the CONSULTANT. 3.2. The Project Manager shall: (a) Review and make appropriate recommendations on all requests submitted by the CONSULTANT for payment for services and work provided and performed in accordance with this Agreement; (b) Provide all criteria and information requested by CONSULTANT as to OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; CA [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 7 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 8of23 (c) Upon request from CONSULTANT, assist CONSULTANT by placing at CONSULTANT'S disposal all available information in the OWNER'S possession pertinent to the Project, including existing drawings, specifications, shop drawings, product literature, previous reports and any other data relative to the Project; (d) Arrange for access to and make all provisions for CONSULTANT to enter the Project site to perform the services to be provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement; and (e) Provide notice to CONSULTANT of any deficiencies or defects discovered by the OWNER with respect to the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT hereunder. ARTICLE FOUR TIME 4.1. Services to be rendered by CONSULTANT shall be commenced subsequent to the execution of this Agreement upon written Notice to Proceed from OWNER for all or any designated portion of the Project and shall be performed and completed in accordance with the Project Milestone Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof as Schedule C. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of this Agreement. 4.2. Should CONSULTANT be obstructed or delayed in the prosecution or completion of its services as a result of unforeseeable causes beyond the control of CONSULTANT, and not due to its own fault or neglect, including but not restricted to acts of nature or of public enemy, acts of government or of the OWNER, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine regulations, strikes or lock-outs, then CONSULTANT shall notify OWNER in writing within five (5) working days after commencement of such delay, stating the specific cause or causes thereof, or be deemed to have waived any right which CONSULTANT may have had to request a time extension for that specific delay. [14-PRC-02738/111066811) 8 CA CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 9 of 23 4.3. No interruption, interference, inefficiency, suspension or delay in the commencement or progress of CONSULTANT'S services from any cause whatsoever, including those for which OWNER may be responsible in whole or in part, shall relieve CONSULTANT of its duty to perform or give rise to any right to damages or additional compensation from OWNER. CONSULTANT'S sole remedy against OWNER will be the right to seek an extension of time to its schedule provided, however, the granting of any such time extension shall not be a condition precedent to the aforementioned "No Damage For Delay" provision. This paragraph shall expressly apply to claims for early completion, as well as claims based on late completion. Provided, however, if through no fault or neglect of CONSULTANT, the services to be provided hereunder have been delayed for a total of 180 calendar days, CONSULTANT'S compensation shall be equitably adjusted, with respect to those services that have not yet been performed, to reflect the incremental increase in costs experienced by CONSULTANT, if any, as a result of such delays. 4.4 Should the CONSULTANT fail to commence, provide, perform or complete any of the services to be provided hereunder in a timely manner, in addition to any other rights or remedies available to the OWNER hereunder, the OWNER at its sole discretion and option may withhold any and all payments due and owing to the CONSULTANT until such time as the CONSULTANT resumes performance of its obligations hereunder in such a manner so as to reasonably establish to the OWNER's satisfaction that the CONSULTANT'S performance is or will shortly be back on schedule. 4.5 In no event shall any approval by OWNER authorizing CONSULTANT to continue performing Work under this Agreement or any payment issued by OWNER to CONSULTANT be deemed a waiver of any right or claim OWNER may have against CONSULTANT for delay or any other damages hereunder. 14-PRC-0273 8/1 1 1 0668/1 [ a 9 CA CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 10 of 23 ARTICLE FIVE COMPENSATION 5.1. Compensation and the manner of payment of such compensation by the OWNER for services rendered hereunder by CONSULTANT shall be as prescribed in Schedule B, entitled "Basis of Compensation", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. ARTICLE SIX OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6.1. Upon the completion or termination of this Agreement, as directed by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall deliver to OWNER copies or originals of all records, documents, drawings, notes, tracings, plans, MicroStation or AutoCAD files, specifications, maps, evaluations, reports and other technical data, other than working papers, prepared or developed by or for CONSULTANT under this Agreement ("Project Documents"). OWNER shall specify whether the originals or copies of such Project Documents are to be delivered by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with delivering to OWNER the Project Documents. CONSULTANT, at its own expense, may retain copies of the Project Documents for its files and internal use. 6.2. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary and without requiring OWNER to pay any additional compensation, CONSULTANT hereby grants to OWNER a nonexclusive, irrevocable license in all of the Project Documents for OWNER'S use on this Project. CONSULTANT warrants to OWNER that it has full right and authority to grant this license to OWNER. Further, CONSULTANT consents to OWNER'S use of the Project Documents to complete the Project following CONSULTANT'S termination for any reason or to perform additions to or remodeling, replacement or renovations of the Project. CONSULTANT also acknowledges OWNER may be making Project Documents available for review and information to various third parties and hereby consents to such use by OWNER. ARTICLE SEVEN MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS 7.1. CONSULTANT will keep adequate records and supporting documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation will be retained by [14-PRC-02738/1110668/11 10 C,� CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 11 of 23 CONSULTANT for a minimum of five (5) years from (a) the date of termination of this Agreement or (b) the date the Project is completed, whichever is later, or such later date as may be required by law. OWNER, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of OWNER, shall, free of charge, have the right to audit, inspect and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the five (5) year period noted above, or such later date as may be required by law; provided, however, such activity shall be conducted only during normal business hours. ARTICLE EIGHT INDEMNIFICATION 8.1. To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold harmless OWNER, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of CONSULTANT or anyone employed or utilized by the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnification obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or reduce any other rights or remedies which otherwise may be available to an indemnified party or person described in this paragraph. ARTICLE NINE INSURANCE 9.1. CONSULTANT shall obtain and carry, at all times during its performance under the Contract Documents, insurance of the types and in the amounts set forth in SCHEDULE D to this Agreement. 9.2. All insurance shall be from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida. 9.3. All insurance policies required by this Agreement shall include the following provisions and conditions by endorsement to the policies: [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 11 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 12 of 23 9.3.1. All insurance policies, other than the Business Automobile policy, Professional Liability policy, and the Workers Compensation policy, provided by CONSULTANT to meet the requirements of this Agreement shall name Collier County Government, Collier County, Florida, as an additional insured as to the operations of CONSULTANT under this Agreement and shall contain a severability of interests provisions. 9.3.2. Companies issuing the insurance policy or policies shall have no recourse against OWNER for payment of premiums or assessments for any deductibles which all are at the sole responsibility and risk of CONSULTANT. 9.3.3. All insurance coverage of CONSULTANT shall be primary to any insurance or self- insurance program carried by OWNER applicable to this Project, and the "Other Insurance" provisions of any policies obtained by CONSULTANT shall not apply to any insurance or self-insurance program carried by OWNER applicable to this Project. 9.3.4. The Certificates of Insurance must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County, or reference this contract number. 9.3.5. All insurance policies shall be fully performable in Collier County, Florida, and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 9.4. CONSULTANT, its subconsultants and OWNER shall waive all rights against each other for damages covered by insurance to the extent insurance proceeds are paid and received by OWNER, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance held by any of them. 9.5. All insurance companies from whom CONSULTANT obtains the insurance policies required hereunder must meet the following minimum requirements: 9.5.1. The insurance company must be duly licensed and authorized by the Department of Insurance of the State of Florida to transact the appropriate insurance business in the State of Florida. 9.5.2. The insurance company must have a current A. M. Best financial rating of "Class VI" or higher. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 12 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 13 of 23 ARTICLE TEN SERVICES BY CONSULTANT'S OWN STAFF 10.1. The services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by CONSULTANT'S own staff, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the OWNER. The employment of, contract with, or use of the services of any other person or firm by CONSULTANT, as independent consultant or otherwise, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the OWNER. No provision of this Agreement shall, however, be construed as constituting an agreement between the OWNER and any such other person or firm. Nor shall anything in this Agreement be deemed to give any such party or any third party any claim or right of action against the OWNER beyond such as may then otherwise exist without regard to this Agreement. 10.2. Attached as Schedule F is a listing of all key personnel CONSULTANT intends to assign to the Project to perform the Services required hereunder. Such personnel shall be committed to this Project in accordance with the percentages noted in Schedule F. CONSULTANT also has identified each subconsultant and subcontractor it intends to utilize on the Project in Schedule F. All personnel, subconsultants and subcontractors identified in Schedule F shall not be removed or replaced without OWNER'S prior written consent. 10.3. CONSULTANT is liable for all the acts or omissions of its subconsultants or subcontractors. By appropriate written agreement, the CONSULTANT shall require each subconsultant or subcontractor, to the extent of the Services to be performed by the subconsultant or subcontractor, to be bound to the CONSULTANT by the terms of this Agreement, and to assume toward the CONSULTANT all the obligations and responsibilities which the CONSULTANT, by this Agreement, assumes toward the OWNER. Each subconsultant or subcontract agreement shall preserve and protect the rights of the OWNER under this Agreement with respect to the Services to be performed by the subconsultant or subcontractor so that the subconsulting or subcontracting thereof will not prejudice such rights. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1) 13 o CP CAC September 11,2014 VIII 4 New Business 14 of 23 Where appropriate, the CONSULTANT shall require each subconsultant or subcontractor to enter into similar agreements with its sub-subconsultants or sub-subcontractors. 10.4. CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that OWNER is a third party beneficiary of each contract entered into between CONSULTANT and each subconsultant or subcontractor, however nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any contractual relationship between OWNER and any subconsultant or subcontractor. Further, all such contracts shall provide that, at Owner's discretion, they are assignable to OWNER upon any termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE ELEVEN WAIVER OF CLAIMS 11.1. CONSULTANT'S acceptance of final payment shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims, except for insurance company subrogation claims, by it against OWNER arising out of this Agreement or otherwise related to the Project, and except those previously made in writing in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and identified by CONSULTANT as unsettled at the time of the final payment. Neither the acceptance of CONSULTANT'S services nor payment by OWNER shall be deemed to be a waiver of any of OWNER'S rights against CONSULTANT. ARTICLE TWELVE TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 12.1. CONSULTANT shall be considered in material default of this Agreement and such default will be considered cause for OWNER to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this section, for any of the following reasons: (a) CONSULTANT'S failure to begin services under the Agreement within the times specified under the Notice(s) to Proceed, or (b) CONSULTANT'S failure to properly and timely perform the services to be provided hereunder or as directed by OWNER, or (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency or a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by CONSULTANT or by any of CONSULTANT'S principals, officers or directors, or (d) CONSULTANT'S failure to obey any laws, ordinances, regulations or other [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 14 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 15 of 23 odeof codes conduct, or (e) CONSULTANT'S failure to perform or abide by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, or (f) for any other just cause. The OWNER may so terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, by giving the CONSULTANT seven (7) calendar days written notice of the material default. 12.2. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement as provided for in paragraph 12.1 above, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that OWNER otherwise was not entitled to the remedy against CONSULTANT provided for in paragraph 12.1, then the notice of termination given pursuant to paragraph 12.1 shall be deemed to be the notice of termination provided for in paragraph 12.3, below, and CONSULTANT's remedies against OWNER shall be the same as and be limited to those afforded CONSULTANT under paragraph 12.3, below. 12.3. OWNER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT. In the event of such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT'S recovery against OWNER shall be limited to that portion of the fee earned through the date of termination, together with any retainage withheld and any costs reasonably incurred by CONSULTANT that are directly attributable to the termination, but CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against OWNER, including, but not limited to, anticipated fees or profits on work not required to be performed. CONSULTANT must mitigate all such costs to the greatest extent reasonably possible. 12.4. Upon termination and as directed by Owner, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the OWNER all original papers, records, documents, drawings, models, and other material set forth and described in this Agreement, including those described in Section 6, that are in CONSULTANT'S possession or under its control. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1) 15 �O G CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 16 of 23 12.5. The OWNER shall have the power to suspend all or any portions of the services to be provided by CONSULTANT hereunder upon giving CONSULTANT two (2) calendar days prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the services to be rendered hereunder are so suspended, the CONSULTANT'S sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article Four herein. 12.6 In the event (i) OWNER fails to make any undisputed payment to CONSULTANT within forty-five (45) days after such payment is due or such other time as required by Florida's Prompt Payment Act or (ii) OWNER otherwise persistently fails to fulfill some material obligation owed by OWNER to CONSULTANT under this Agreement, and (ii) OWNER has failed to cure such default within fourteen (14) days of receiving written notice of same from CONSULTANT, then CONSULTANT may stop its performance under this Agreement until such default is cured, after giving OWNER a second fourteen (14) days written notice of CONSULTANT's intention to stop performance under the Agreement. If the Services are so stopped for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) consecutive days through no act or fault of the CONSULTANT or its subconsultant or subcontractor or their agents or employees or any other persons performing portions of the Services under contract with the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to OWNER of CONSULTANT'S intent to terminate this Agreement. If OWNER does not cure its default within fourteen (14) days after receipt of CONSULTANT'S written notice, CONSULTANT may, upon fourteen (14) additional days' written notice to the OWNER, terminate the Agreement and recover from the Owner payment for Services performed through the termination date, but in no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to payment for Services not performed or any other damages from Owner. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 16 CP CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 17 of 23 ARTICLE THIRTEEN TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION REPRESENTATIONS 13.1. CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 13.2. In accordance with provisions of Section 287.055, (5)(a), Florida Statutes, the CONSULTANT agrees to execute the required Truth-In-Negotiation Certificate, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Schedule E, certifying that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation for CONSULTANT'S services to be provided under this Agreement are accurate, complete and current at the time of the Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees that the original Agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the OWNER determines the Agreement price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such adjustments shall be made within one (1) year following the end of this Agreement. ARTICLE FOURTEEN CONFLICT OF INTEREST 14.1. CONSULTANT represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further represents that no persons having any such interest shall be employed to perform those services. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1) 17 �J CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 18 of 23 ARTICLE FIFTEEN MODIFICATION 15.1. No modification or change in this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party unless in writing and executed by the party or parties intended to be bound by it. ARTICLE SIXTEEN NOTICES AND ADDRESS OF RECORD 16.1. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the CONSULTANT to the OWNER shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand, by fax, or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, addressed to the following OWNER'S address of record: Board of County Commissioners Collier County Florida Purchasing Department 3327 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Attention: Joanne Markiewicz, Director, Procurement Services Telephone: 239-252-8407 Fax: 239-252-6480 16.2. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement to be given by the OWNER to the CONSULTANT shall be made in writing and shall be delivered by hand, by fax or by the United States Postal Service Department, first class mail service, postage prepaid, addressed to the following CONSULTANT'S address of record: Humiston & Moore Engineers, P.A. 5679 Strand Court Naples, FL 34110 Telephone: 239-594-2021 FAX: 239-594-2025 Attn: Brett D. Moore, PE 16.3. Either party may change its address of record by written notice to the other party given in accordance with requirements of this Article. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/11 18 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 19 of 23 ARTICLE SEVENTEEN MISCELLANEOUS 17.1. CONSULTANT, in representing OWNER, shall promote the best interests of OWNER and assume towards OWNER a duty of the highest trust, confidence, and fair dealing. 17.2. No modification, waiver, suspension or termination of the Agreement or of any terms thereof shall impair the rights or liabilities of either party. 17.3. This Agreement is not assignable, or otherwise transferable in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of OWNER. 17.4. Waivers by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. 17.5. The headings of the Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments as contained in this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not be deemed to expand, limit or change the provisions in such Articles, Schedules, Parts and Attachments. 17.6. This Agreement, including the referenced Schedules and Attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall supersede, replace and nullify any and all prior agreements or understandings, written or oral, relating to the matter set forth herein, and any such prior agreements or understanding shall have no force or effect whatever on this Agreement. 17.7. Unless otherwise expressly noted herein, all representations and covenants of the parties shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 19 U CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 20 of 23 17.8. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 17.9. The terms and conditions of the following Schedules attached hereto are by this reference incorporated herein: Schedule A SCOPE OF SERVICES Schedule B BASIS OF COMPENSATION Schedule C PROJECT MILESTONE SCHEDULE Schedule D INSURANCE COVERAGE Schedule E TRUTH IN NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE Schedule F KEY PERSONNEL, SUBCONSULTANTS AND SUBCONTRACTORS RFP # 14-6257 Engineering Services for Doctors Pass Jetty Terms and Conditions Consultant's Proposal ARTICLE EIGHTEEN APPLICABLE LAW 18.1. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws, rules, and regulations of the State of Florida, and by such laws, rules and regulations of the United States as made applicable to services funded by the United States government. Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters. ARTICLE NINETEEN SECURING AGREEMENT/PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES 19.1. CONSULTANT warrants that CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 20 CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 21 of 23 secure this Agreement and that CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. At the time this Agreement is executed, CONSULTANT shall sign and deliver to OWNER the Truth-In-Negotiation Certificate identified in Article 13 and attached hereto and made a part hereof as Schedule E. CONSULTANT'S compensation shall be adjusted to exclude any sums by which OWNER determines the compensation was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. 19.2. By its execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT acknowledges that it has been informed by OWNER of and is in compliance with the terms of Section 287.133(2)(a) of the Florida Statutes which read as follows: "A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list." ARTICLE TWENTY DISPUTE RESOLUTION 20.1 Prior to the initiation of any action or proceeding permitted by this Agreement to resolve disputes between the parties, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any such disputes by negotiation. The negotiation shall be attended by representatives of CONSULTANT with full decision-making authority and by OWNER'S staff person who would make the presentation of any settlement reached during negotiations to OWNER for approval. Failing resolution, and prior to the commencement of depositions in any litigation between the parties arising out of this Agreement, the parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute through Mediation [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 21 �U� CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 22 of 23 before an agreed-upon Circuit Court Mediator certified by the State of Florida. The mediation shall be attended by representatives of CONSULTANT with full decision-making authority and by OWNER'S staff person who would make the presentation of any settlement reached at mediation to OWNER'S board for approval. Should either party fail to submit to mediation as required hereunder, the other party may obtain a court order requiring mediation under section 44.102, Fla. Stat. 20.2 Any suit or action brought by either party to this Agreement against the other party relating to or arising out of this Agreement must be brought in the appropriate federal or state courts in Collier County, Florida, which courts have sole and exclusive jurisdiction on all such matters. ARTICLE 21 IMMIGRATION LAW COMPLIANCE 21.1 By executing and entering into this agreement, the CONSULTANT is formally acknowledging without exception or stipulation that it is fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.S.C. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the CONSULTANT to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately. ********** (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) [14-PRC-02738/1110668/1] 22 C.) CAC September 11,2014 VIII-4 New Business 23 of 23 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Professional Services Agreement for Engineering Services for Doctors Pass Jetty on the day and year first written above. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, Dwight E. Brock, Clerk By: Date: By: Tom Henning, Chairman roved as to Form and Legality: roved stant County Attorney Name Humiston & Moore Engineers, P.A. By: Witness Name and Title Name and Title Witness Name and Title ®) , 23