Loading...
CCPC Agenda 08/21/2014 R COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 21 , 2014 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., THURSDAY, AUGUST 21 2014, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR,3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS- 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 1 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PL20130001767/CP-2013-10: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, by establishing the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District to allow a residential only,commercial only or mixed use project at the following density/intensity: up to 12 residential dwelling units per acre for a maximum of 360 residential dwelling units, up to 250,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 150 room hotel at a floor area ratio of.60 and an assisted living facility at a floor area ratio of.60. The commercial uses allowed by right are all permitted uses and conditional uses in the C-1 General Office through C-5 Commercial General Zoning Districts in the Collier County Land Development Code; and furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located at the corner of Southwest Boulevard and US 41 (Tamiami Trail East) in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 31 ±acres. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,AICP,Principal Planner] B. PUDZA-PL20140000099: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2009-21, the Mirasol Residential Planned Unit Development, as amended, by increasing the permissible number of dwelling units from 1,121 to 1,233;by amending Ordinance Number 2004- 41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 19.7± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Mirasol RPUD; by increasing the dwelling units from 1,121 to 1,233; by changing the name of the RPUD from the Mirasol RPUD to the Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD; by revising the Development Standards; by amending the Master Plan and revising Developer Commitments. The property is located on the north side of Immokalee Road (CR 846) bordered on the east by future Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Sections 10, 15 and 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 1,658.3± acres;and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Kay Deselem,AICP, Principal Planner] 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp 2 Clerk of Court COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 CYCLE 3 AMENDMENT (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) Project/Petition #'s: PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 LELY, A ' SORT) COMMUNITY CC N i APLES MA4CR I DRI} .a If. ki II r�IltFU ‘ 29 I 'pi I 27 1:7 U cc (S) re, 1 W a TLE �I 1 v WOODS *IISTL.ERS COVE PROJECT TREE TOPS LOCATION TRAM, I ACRES 32 .33 34 VINCE/MAN 1 (S) *ENT*ORTH ESTATES 1 VICTORIA FALLS CCPC: August 21 , 2014 BCC: October 14, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC— 2013 Cycle 3 GMP Transmittal Amendment CCPC August 21, 2014 AGENDA 1) TAB: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report: PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 2) TAB: Resolution DOCUMENT: Transmittal Resolution with Exhibit "A" text (and/or maps): PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 3) TAB: Petition DOCUMENT: Project PL20130001767/ Petition CP-2013-10 4) TAB: Legal Advertisements DOCUMENT: CCPC Advertisement Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A Co e-r •o-u.-Prty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULATION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: August 21, 2014 RE: PETITION CP-2013-10 / PL-2013-0001767, Growth Management Plan Amendment (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) APPLICANTS/OWNERS/AGENTS: Global Properties of Naples, LLC Christopher Shucart, Manager 2414 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 615 Naples, Florida 34103 Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Hole Montes, Inc. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34110 Naples, Florida 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The ±31 acre subject site is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. REQUESTED ACTION: Amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan, to introduce a new Subdistrict. This petition seeks to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. (CP-2013-10 Resolution Exhibit A reflects the petitioner's proposed text changes) SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Subject Site The subject site comprises ±31 acres, and is designated Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map and lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area. The site is zoned Vincentian PUD and is undeveloped. The PUD provides for a maximum gross density of 4 dwelling units per acre (on the Residential tract); assisted living facilities; and up to 115,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses, including all permitted C-2, Convenience Commercial district uses, community theater amusement and recreation services, a miniature golf course, bike and moped rental amusement and recreation services, auto & home supply stores, business services, drinking places, hospitals, membership organizations, museums & art galleries, paint , glass & wallpaper stores, public - 1 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A administration, non-depository credit institutions, real estate services, retail nurseries, lawn & garden supply stores, social services, used merchandise stores, the USPS, and comparable C-2 commercial uses (on the Commercial Infill tract). A detailed list of uses allowed in the PUD is provided further below. Pedestrian sidewalks are on south side of US 41, along the entire frontage of subject site, and on east side of Southwest Boulevard, also along the entire frontage of subject site. Surrounding Lands North of Subject Site: Across US 41, land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map, and zoned Whistlers Cove PUD. Whistlers Cove is developed with multi-family residential apartment buildings. The Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project facility is situated (north) east (within Eagle Lakes Park), across US 41. A pedestrian sidewalk is on north side of US 41, along entire frontage opposite the subject site. West of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. An area zoned C-5, Heavy Commercial District fronts US 41 and is developed with an automobile service station immediately across Southwest Boulevard; then with a self storage facility further (north) west. The area behind the commercial development, and across Southwest Boulevard, is zoned RSF-4 and developed as Trail Acres, a single family residential subdivision. A pedestrian sidewalk is on west side of Southwest Boulevard, along entire frontage opposite the subject site. South of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. This area is zoned RSF-4 and developed as Trail Acres, a single family residential subdivision. East of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, and zoned C-3 and MH. An area zoned C-3, Commercial Intermediate District fronts US 41 and is developed with a Collier County government service facility; then with a multi-tenant strip mall further (south) east, with its parking lot fronting US 41. The area behind these government service and commercial uses is the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, with a mobile home park service building and vehicle area located directly behind the government service facility. In summary, along with the commercial development on the south side of US 41, the existing land uses in the area immediately surrounding or directly opposite the subject site are predominately residential in nature. STAFF ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations The Vincentian PUD was originally approved in 1985 (Ord. 85-27) and allowed "80 residential units for the elderly" on 10 acres for density of eight (8) dwelling units per acre; "a school, church, rectory and related uses" on 10 acres; and, "institutional care facilities such as, but not limited to children's home, residence for unwed mothers, family enrichment center, special educational center, etc." on 10.7 acres (31.7 acres total). The PUD was rezoned to a new Vincentian PUD in 1991 (Ord. 91-88), via the County's implementation of the zoning reevaluation program, to lower the residential allowance to 30 dwelling units (3 DU/A on 10 acres) (31.7 acres total). In 1999, the PUD was again rezoned to a new Vincentian PUD (Ord. 99-37)to allow 115,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses on 8.5 acres, residential development at four (4) dwelling units per acre on 9.8 acres, and group housing/nursing home/ALF at 0.45 FAR (30 acres total). In this latter rezone, the allowance of commercial uses along US 41 was deemed consistent with the FLUE via the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict. The commercial uses allowed are: all permitted uses in C-2, Convenience Commercial zoning district; amusement and recreation services - community theater, miniature golf course, bike and moped rental amusement and recreation services; auto & home supply stores; business services, with exceptions; drinking - 2 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A places, with exclusions; hospitals; membership organizations; miscellaneous retail; museums & art galleries; paint , glass &wallpaper stores; public administration; non-depository credit institutions; real estate; retail nurseries, lawn & garden supply stores; social services; used merchandise stores, with exceptions; U.S. Postal Service, except major distribution center; and, any other commercial use comparable with the foregoing and consistent with the C-2 district. For all three rezones, the property was owned by the [Catholic] Diocese of Venice; was designated Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (as it is designated today); and, was in the Coastal Management Area then Coastal High Hazard Area - as it is today. It is important to note that application materials suggest the uses generally described in the present Vincentian PUD are the basis from which new/additional uses are proposed, and are not confined to the permitted uses itemized above. This approach is reported further in the Comments Specific to the Commercial Needs Analysis section, below. Justifications (Refer to Attachment "B", Justification and Supplemental Information) The justifications asserted in the application's supplemental information for the proposed amendment are: (1) The shape and size of the subject site allows for a variety of commercial use options; (2) The area would benefit from additional commercial development; (3) The commercial needs study identifies a need for additional commercial uses and a deficiency in lands designated for commercial development; (4) Low density residential development is not feasible in the current market; (5) The site is well situated due to its access and exposure to an arterial roadway; (6) There is a strong demand for market rate apartments; (7) The minimum density necessary to attract a developer and quality design is considered to be around 12 dwelling units per acre; (8) The amount of commercial acreage and square footage is reduced in a mixed-use development scenario; An assessment finds only some of these justifications are supported by the petition's data and analysis. Detailed analyses are provided further below. Commercial Analysis (Refer to Attachment"E", Commercial Needs Analysis) Generally, commercial development within a community can be categorized as strip commercial development, neighborhood commercial, community commercial, regional commercial, and so forth. Based on specific studies and/or demographic data for an area, such as population, income, household size, percentage of income spent on retail goods, etc., an analyst is able to estimate supportable commercial square feet for various lines of goods and services for that geography by shopping center type. Relevant to the subject petition, a community commercial needs analysis was provided in support of the requested commercial development. The firm of Fishkind and Associates, Inc., conducted a Commercial Needs Analysis dated January 31, 2014 with an amended date of July 31, 2014, identifying the market conditions within a 5-minute, 10- minute and 15-minute drive time from the subject site. This analysis provided an assessment of the community commercial needs for the existing and projected population within the site's market area. Analysis identifies that there is a demand for community serving commercial within the 10-minute and 15-minute drive-time market areas. The commercial square feet demand findings from the study are as follows: - 3 - CP-2013-10/ PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A The community commercial square feet demand that can be supported by the area's population projected in 2019 is 920,597 sq. ft. within the 10-minute drive time and 1,438,596 sq. ft. within the 15-minute drive time. To allow for flexibility within the market, the application of a 1.25 market factor yields supportable community square feet of 1,150,747 sq. ft. within the 10-minute drive time and 1,798,211 sq. ft. within the 15-minute drive time. Staff Assessment: Based on the data submitted with this petition it cannot be ascertained whether demand exists for additional community commercial square feet at this location. Irregularities in the data presented, such as the use of dwelling unit figures where commercial analyses typically use household figures contributes to these irregularities. Employing dwelling unit figures where households are being analyzed effectively over-estimates demand as household figures would not produce the same results. Derivative over-estimations directly impact the household income calculations for establishing demand. The application of the figures used produce an unrepresentative data set and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate. [Note: A "household" is, by U.S. Census Bureau definition, an occupied dwelling unit. Given the occupancy/vacancy rates in Collier County, there is a significant difference in the number of dwelling units and number of households in a given geography (countywide 67.5% occupancy/32.5% vacancy, but varies by Census Tract).] Another example of inaccuracies produced by irregularities in the data submitted is the use of population numbers - where the data sets based on Census geography may have been split by the market area boundary. These are the Census sub-areas (Blocks or TAZs) used to calculate the population and households within the market area. For those sub-areas only partially within the market area, using whole - not partial - population figures over-calculates demand. The application of the whole figures used produces an unrepresentative data set and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate. One more example of data irregularity is the all-inclusive commercial center types used in the demand calculations and reflected in the Allocation tables appearing in Commercial Needs Analysis. Household incomes available for spending on different goods and services (general merchandise, food, entertainment, etc.) are distributed among all shopping center types and not allocated further specifically to community commercial shopping centers - again, over-calculating demand. The application of the "all center types" figures produces an unrepresentative data set and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate. The Commercial Needs Analysis reports a community commercial square feet supply of 2,437,398 sq. ft. described as existing or potential community commercial floor area in the market area. Staff Assessment Many of the community shopping centers listed in the Commercial Needs Analysis contain developed outparcels which would seem to be integral components of the community shopping center, yet are excluded. Staff finds an additional 318,540 sq. ft. for an estimated total of 2,755,938 community commercial development (comprised of the outparcels, omitted square feet at existing centers - gardens centers at four different community centers, and differences in square foot allocations for some community centers). See attached staff worksheet. The data and analysis submitted to support the request addresses community commercial uses only- but proposed Subdistrict provisions also allow neighborhood commercial development, regional commercial development [including several high intensity C-5, Heavy Commercial uses], all office development, and hotel/motel uses. Staff Assessment: Application materials over-estimate demand for, and under-estimate supply of, community commercial development, and do not provide the supply/demand data & analysis for other -4- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A commercial categories. Without such support, it cannot be ascertained that demand exists at this location for additional neighborhood commercial square feet beyond the square feet already approved in the PUD, or community and regional commercial square feet newly proposed. Apartment Analysis (Refer to Attachment"D", Rental Apartment Survey) The firm of Fishkind and Associates, Inc., conducted a Rental Apartment Survey dated March 11, 2014 with an amended date of July 31, 2014, identifying the supply and demand trends and associated pricing of the rental apartment market in the County. This analysis surveyed more than forty apartment complexes including 100 apartments or more and assessed the housing needs for [market rate] rental apartment, and found the following: • Increasing Average Sizes and Rental Rates • An Increasing Countywide Occupancy Rate: From 88% in 2010 to 97% in 2013 • A Countywide Average Size: ?.20 acres • A Countywide Average Density: from >_ 11 units/acre to ? 13 units/acre • A Countywide Average Unit Count: >_ 231 units The data and analysis submitted to support the request addresses a specific residential type - rental apartments - and proposed Subdistrict provisions allow only rental apartments. Application materials also review comparable rental condominiums, but do not provide the demand/supply data & analysis for fee simple condominiums, single-family residences or other residential types. Notwithstanding these absences, the demand for market rate apartments can be ascertained. It is important to note that virtually all of the apartment complexes surveyed are located outside the Coastal High Hazard Area, where such densities and unit numbers are appropriate and can be attained. The County's limitations on density are detailed in the Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies section below. Residential Density and Land Use Intensities The FLUE allows density in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, which lies within the CHHA, to exceed 4 dwelling units per acre only for developments qualifying for density bonuses by providing affordable housing. The Subdistrict proposes residential density of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre in a location where 3 dwelling units per acre are allowed [4 dwelling units per acre using the conversion of commercial zoning density bonus, where applicable, or up to an additional 8 dwelling units per acre for affordable workforce housing density bonus] -while no qualifiers for density bonuses are being proposed or met. The Vincentian property presently allows for 4 dwelling units per acre based on the residential component acreage for a maximum of 39 dwelling units. Proposed Subdistrict provisions base density on the entire acreage for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. The amount of residential units is not reduced proportionally with any reduction of acreage devoted to commercial development. By way of comparison, the Whistler's Cove PUD meets affordable housing qualifiers for density bonuses and is approved for a density of 10 dwelling units per acre. Application materials present a basis/rationale for allowing residential density to be calculated based upon total property acreage as an opportunity to maximize the site's development potential - without the density bonus qualifiers met by comparable developments. - 5 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A Appropriateness of the Site The Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC) Subdistrict allows the full array of commercial uses (C-1 thru C-5 Districts) and residential density at a maximum of 16 dwelling units per acre, except within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (max. of 4 DU/A) and Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (max. of 1.5 DU/A, or 2.5 dwelling units per acre utilizing the transfer of development rights). There are 19 MUACs; each is located at the intersection of two major roads, and they are spaced no closer than two (2) miles apart as measured at intersection midpoints. FLUE Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict provisions allow for establishment of new Activity Centers subject to the following criteria: • Site must be situated at the intersection of two arterial roads or one arterial and one collector road -as identified in the Transportation Element; • Site must be located no closer than two (2) miles from another MUAC; and, • Market justification must be demonstrated. This amendment allows the option of developing the site with commercial uses as allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, with some exclusions, or residential development at 11.74 dwelling units per acre. Essentially, this Subdistrict allows the same commercial development use intensity as the MUAC, and residential development at a higher density than a MUAC within the Urban Coastal Fringe - albeit on 30.6 acres whereas MUAC quadrants were originally 40 acres each (now MUAC quadrants vary from less than 10 acres to roughly 250 acres). No other subdistrict besides MUAC allows the commercial use intensity proposed by this Subdistrict, and few others allow the residential density proposed or the density calculation based on total site acreage within a mixed use project. The subject site does not meet the first two criteria for establishing a new Activity Center and may not meet the third criterion. Community Desires (Refer to Attachment "C", Vision for the East Trail Corridor, and NIM comments toward the end of this Report.) Staff understands that this Vision document was not prepared at BCC direction nor presented to and accepted by the BCC. Nonetheless, staff offers the following observations: • General Urban areas in [East Trail Corridor] Segment 1 and Segment 2 are envisioned to be primarily low to medium density residential in nature but should provide opportunities for mixed use developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping and public parks, squares and greens. The present Vincentian PUD satisfies this vision (at a density of 4 dwelling units per acre), while the proposed Subdistrict would not (with a density of more than 11 dwelling units per acre). • The vision for [East Trail Corridor] Segment 2 does not seek more hotels or other non-community commercial uses, while the proposed Subdistrict allows hotels [and many of these other non- community commercial uses]. These inconsistencies between the proposed Subdistrict text and the Vision document do not lend support to the request. People attending the Neighborhood Information Meeting raised questions and concerns related to site design and land uses. Find more information in the NIM Synopsis below. Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies within the Growth Management Plan As previously noted, the subject site lies within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (UCF) and the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA encompasses all of the UCF, some lands north of US 41 East, and some lands north of the City of Naples (mostly west of US 41). The UCF Subdistrict reads as follows: "The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Conservation designated area (primarily located to the south of the Subdistrict) and the remainder of the Urban designated area (primarily located to the north of the Subdistrict). The Subdistrict - 6 - CP-2013-10/ PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A comprises those Urban areas south of US 41, generally east of the City of Naples, and generally west of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands, but excludes Section 13, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, and comprises approximately 11,354 acres and 10% of the Urban Mixed Use District. The entire Subdistrict is located seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area Boundary. In order to facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation designated area, residential densities within the Subdistrict shall not exceed a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfers of Development Rights, and except as allowed by certain FLUE Policies under Objective 5, and except as provided in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. New rezones to permit mobile home development within this Subdistrict are prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development." The CHHA reads as follows: "Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) defines the Coastal High Hazard Area(CHHA). The CHHA boundary is generally depicted on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. New rezones to permit mobile home development shall not be allowed within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining to the expenditure of public funds for public facilities within the CHHA." Historically, the State has discouraged increasing density within the CHHA (so as to direct population concentration away from known or predicted coastal high hazards and not to negatively affect hurricane evacuation times). For the most part, so has the County. Only two density bonuses are applicable in the CHHA - affordable-workforce housing, and conversion of commercial zoning [that has been deemed consistent by policy]; other density bonuses are not applicable within the CHHA. By way of example, the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay (depicted on the FLUM and generally encompassing lands along Davis Blvd./US 41 East/Airport-Pulling Rd./Bayshore Dr.), now entirely within the CHHA, promotes redevelopment, especially of mixed use projects. When the County drafted the GMP amendment to create this Overlay in 2000, it included a traditional density bonus as an incentive (ask for density increase via rezoning process) which would have allowed an overall increase of density in the CHHA. The State objected. The County responded by revising the amendment to establish a density pool derived from previously entitled density from the Naples Botanical Gardens site (the density allowed by the zoning of that site prior to its rezoning to PUD); this was acceptable to the State. This density pool provides for increased density of projects within the Overlay via a reallocation of density, not a creation of new density, thus the overall density within the CHHA is not increased. For most rezones within the UCF, density is limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, and typically just 3 dwelling units per acre due to the density reduction factor of minus 1 dwelling units per acre for lying within the CHHA. The primary exception to 3 or 4 dwelling units per acre is for provision of affordable-workforce housing, a density bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. The conversion of commercial zoning bonus is applicable in the UCF only to the extent of increasing density back to the cap of 4 dwelling units per acre [4 DU/A(base density) minus 1 DU/A(CHHA reduction) = 3 DU/A; +1 DU/A (conversion of commercial zoning bonus) = 4 DU/A maximum eligible density for market rate housing]. Outside of the UCF but still within the CHHA, the density cap is 16 dwelling units per acre, not 4 dwelling units per acre [4 DU/A (base density) minus 1 DU/A (CHHA reduction) = 3 DU/A; +16 DU/A (conversion of commercial zoning bonus) = 16 DU/A maximum eligible density for market rate housing]. Under the FLUE's density rating system, density is based upon the total site acreage less commercial and industrial acreage, and less any acreage for uses with a residential density equivalency established in the LDC; and, eligible density is not an entitlement. For the subject site, the maximum eligible density is 3 dwelling units per acre for market rate housing or 11 dwelling units per acre for - 7 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A affordable-workforce housing (30 acres total minus 8.5 acres commercial tract = 21.5 acres x 3 DU/A = 65 DUs, or, x 11 DU/A= 237 DUs). Note: the existing PUD allows 4 dwelling units per acre, but this density is based solely on the acreage of the residential tracts (9.8 acres x 4 DU/A= 39 DUs). Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 12.1.2 reads as follows: "Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times." The applicant responds that consistency is met by agreeing to provide, as requested by the Bureau of Emergency Services Director, a portable generator for use at emergency shelters. Hurricane Mitigation Requirements Collier County Emergency Management has reviewed the PUD and the associated hurricane mitigation needs to aid in evacuation refuge efforts for this site. Staff has determined that the best mitigation effort for this PUD would be for an off-site nearby public-shelter as is typically the shelter of last-resort. These shelter(s) are determined and announced as the storm approaches Collier County based on storm's intensity, surge model, direction of travel, time of day and day of week impact among others factors. Collier County is therefore requiring the developer to provide a new towable, quiet running, extended run-time towable 45kW (minimum-kW) generator per Emergency Management's specifications. The towable generator will be a one-time developer contribution based on the number of units currently permitted to meet the hurricane mitigation impact for evacuation concerns. The generator specifications must be pre-approved by the Department of Emergency Management as the County has certain interoperable standards and required safety options. The towable generator allows for additional evacuee capacities at various shelter(s) that can be used based on the storm factors referenced above. [Dan E. Summers, Director Department of Emergency Management] Environmental Impacts Passarella and Associates submitted an environmental report, dated October 2013. Collier County Department of Natural Resources personnel reviewed this petition and provided the following analysis: The subject site is an undeveloped 30.68 acre parcel located on the south side of US 41 in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. Surrounding properties are developed with residential and commercial uses, with no preserves or undeveloped land containing native vegetation abutting the subject site. The majority of the subject site is forested with native vegetation, mainly slash pine and pine/cypress vegetative communities. Exotic vegetation occupies most of the site, with 50 to 100 percent coverage with exotic vegetation. Also on-site are approximately 12.66 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Wetlands on-site are isolated with no hydrological connection to wetlands or waters off-site. Listed species surveys were conducted on the subject site on March 6, 2012 and April 7, 1998 by the environmental consultant for the petitioner. No listed wildlife species or signs of listed wildlife species were observed on the property. A literature search by the environmental consultant found no documented occurrences of listed wildlife species on the property and the property not to be located in any state or federal agency designated habitat areas for listed wildlife species. A letter from the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources indicates no significant archaeological of historical sites recorded for or likely to be present within the subject area. The letter also states that because of the property location and/or nature it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. The site is subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical - 8 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A sites as required by Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 11.1.3. The provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the Land Development Code (LDC). The subject site is not located within any County well field protection zones. The proposed GMP amendment allows for the off-site retention of all the native vegetation required to be retained on the subject property. Much of the subject site appears to already qualify for the off-site retention of native vegetation provision in the LDC, which allows for preserves with 75 percent or more coverage with exotic vegetation to be satisfied off-site. To insure the entire preserve requirement can be satisfied off-site, an exemption to the restrictions in the LDC provision has been included in the GMP amendment. Requests for deviations to the native vegetation retention requirements in the GMP and LDC are allowed pursuant to Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policies 6.1.1 (10 & 13). The CCME Policies are as follows. Policy 6.1.1 (10) CCME The County shall adopt land development regulations that allow for a process whereby a property owner may submit a petition requesting that all or a portion of the native vegetation preservation retention requirement to be satisfied by a monetary payment, land donation that contains native vegetative communities equal to or of a higher priority as described in Policy 6.1.1 (4) than the land being impacted, or other appropriate method of compensation to an acceptable land acquisition program, as required by the land development regulations. The monetary payment shall be used to purchase and manage native vegetative communities off-site. The land development regulations shall provide criteria to determine when this alternative will be considered. The criteria will be based upon the following provisions: a. The amount, type, rarity and quality of the native vegetation on site; b. The presence of conservation lands adjoining the site; c. The presence of listed species and consideration of Federal and State agency technical assistance; d. The type of land use proposed, such as, but not limited to, affordable housing; e. The size of the preserve required to remain on site is too small to ensure that the preserve can remain functional; and f. Right of Way acquisitions for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area. The land development regulations shall include a methodology to establish the monetary value, land donation, or other appropriate method of compensation to ensure that native vegetative communities not preserved on-site will be preserved and appropriately managed off-site. Policy 6.1.1 (13) CCME The County may grant a deviation to the native vegetation retention requirements of sub-sections 2, 4, 5, 10, and 12 of this Policy, and shall adopt land development regulations to set forth the process for obtaining a deviation. The regulations shall allow for the granting of a deviation by the appropriate review board after a public hearing, and for the granting of a deviation administratively. The County shall consider the amount and type of native vegetation and the presence of listed species in determining whether the granting of a deviation requires a public hearing, or may be granted administratively. The County may grant a deviation if: a. County, Federal or State agencies require that site improvements be located in areas which result in an inability to meet the provisions of this Policy, or - 9 — CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A b. On or off-site environmental conditions are such that the application of one or more provisions of this Policy is not possible or will result in a preserve area of lesser quality, or c. The strict adherence to these provisions will not allow for the implementation of other Plan policies that encourage beneficial land uses. Given the above, staff supports the request to allow for off-site retention of native vegetation. Pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances, the project requires review by the [CCPC acting in their capacity as the] Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). A deviation to the provisions in the LDC on when native vegetation can be satisfied off-site is being requested through the GMP amendment. The applicable provision from Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances is provided below. (m) Scope of land development project reviews. The EAC shall review the following: (1) Any PUD that requests a deviation from environmental standards of the LDC or any development order that requests a deviation from the provisions identified in GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13). [Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist Surface Water&Environmental Planning Section] Historical and Archaeological Impacts The historical and archaeological characteristics inherent to the subject site are addressed in application materials. In a letter dated May 18, 1998 the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources writes, "a review of the Florida Site File indicates no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the subject area, and that "it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected." Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Study Analysis, Including Transportation Element Consistency Determination Trebilcock Consulting Solutions submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS), dated October 18, 2013. The substantive review of this document was done by the Transportation Planning Section, and their review comments are provided below. The petition indicates that [the subject site] is intended to have a corporate headquarters based, mixed-use project. The new Subdistrict however, allows for all commercial, all residential, or mixed- use (commercial and residential) development. The TIS analyzes it as a shopping center within a single-use scenario and within a mixed-use scenario. Additional uses that exceed the trip generation limits of the shopping center use have been proposed (i.e. gas station). The land uses proposed are reconciled with the analysis in the TIS, reviewing the trip generation characteristics of each potential use. The most impactful combination of trip generators has been selected at the maximized square footage they could achieve, and a trip generation "cap" has been developed that will become a condition of approval [in the companion PUD]. The proposal may be considered consistent with the Transportation Element of the GMP by way of implementing this Trip Generation Cap at the zoning phase as a mitigation strategy to limit their impacts (which meets Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element). Implementing the Trip Generation Cap ensures the TIS will be consistent with the categorized land uses, and the PUD and FLUM will be consistent with one another. [John Podczerwinsky, Project Manager Transportation Planning Section] - 10 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A Public Facilities Impact Development within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is addressed in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). CCME Objective 3 and related Policies limit public expenditures in the CHHA for certain public facilities needed to support new development permitted by the Future Land Use Element. Application materials present the public facilities needed to support the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict as follows: • Water: The subject site will be served by Collier County Water District potable water treatment and distribution system. Depending upon the development scenario (all commercial, all residential, or mixed-use development), the estimated demand for potable water for the project ranges from 28,000 to 42,000 gallons per day [Peak demand: from 78 to 117 gallons per minute]. • Wastewater: The subject site will be served by the Collier County Sewer District wastewater collection and treatment system. Depending upon the development scenario, the estimated demand for wastewater for the project ranges from 25,000 to 38,000 gallons per day [Peak demand: from 69 to 106 gallons per minute]. • Solid Waste Disposal: The service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The Annual Update and Inventory on Public Facilities (AUIR) indicates the County has sufficient landfill capacity up to the year 2065 for the required lined cell capacity. • Stormwater Management: Future development is expected to comply with the SFWMD and/or Collier County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of stormwater events by both on-site and off-site improvements. • Park and Recreational Facilities: There are no anticipated adverse impacts to park facilities from the proposed development. • Schools: There are no anticipated adverse impacts to public school facilities from the proposed development. • Emergency Medical and Fire Protection Services: The subject site is located within the Golden Gate Fire District. The proposed increases of commercial intensity and floor area and increases of residential density and dwelling units are anticipated to have minimal impacts on these safety services. [Kris Van Lengen, Principal Project Manager Public Utilities Planning & Project Management Dept.] NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was [duly advertised, noticed and] held on Thursday, July 17, 201, 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting Rm. "B", located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples. Approximately 16 people other than the application team and County staff attended -and heard the following information: The applicant's agent provided a full description of the proposed GMP amendment to the group, including that the amendment has a companion petition to amend the PUD. Together they will allow for flexibility in design, in terms of allowing a mixture of uses. The applicant desires any residential development to be higher density at market rate, and indicated a commitment to preclude affordable housing. People voiced their concerns regarding affordable housing and supported the applicant's commitment to develop only market rate housing. People voiced their concerns regarding storm events and water run-off, and the distances water management facilities, buffer plantings and berms would be to their properties. They also discussed - 11 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A interconnection with the Hitching Post Plaza, and suggested that these features [indicated above] be designed to not obstruct interconnection and afford the ability to create access. Land uses on both side of this property boundary would need to be configured or reconfigured to keep this option open - and both the applicant and the speakers were encouraged to pursue this further. People voiced their concerns about the height limitations on buildings for the variety of different uses allowed, such as the multi-family residential buildings, senior living facilities, hotels, and so forth. The applicant's agent described their design as one providing "good" separation and substantial landscape buffers. Aside from the concerns summarized above no one in attendance expressed opposition to the proposed GMP amendment. The meeting was completed by 6:30 p.m. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The following findings and conclusions result from the reviews and analyses of this request: • The subject site was approved in 1999 for mixed use development only - not stand-alone commercial or residential development. The approved density of 4 dwelling units per acre based only upon PUD residential tracts acreage yields less density than allowed by the FLUE (39 vs. 65 DUs). • More than 12,000 approved but un-built dwelling units are proximate to this site, with application materials explaining why this existing inventory cannot be used to meet the demand for more apartments. • The proposed Subdistrict limits residential development to market rate apartments only. • Subdistrict allows residential density of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre in a Coastal High Hazard Area location where additional dwelling units (beyond 4 DU/A) can only be attained when qualifying for an affordable workforce housing density bonus, but no qualifiers for density bonuses are met. • The amount of residential units in mixed use developments are typically reduced proportionally with the amount of acreage devoted to commercial development, but this Subdistrict bases residential density on the entire acreage allowing for 360 dwelling units. • To represent shopping practices in typical market analyses, a declining household percentage is applied to the three drive times, the farther from the subject site the market area extends. • Significant impacts to public facilities, as defined in the Capital Improvement Element, with respect to Transportation, Potable Water Supply, Wastewater Treatment, Stormwater Management and Solid Waste Disposal facilities will not result from this amendment. • Based on data and analysis submitted for the supply of existing and potential commercial development and demand within the market area for the subject site, the additional need for the proposed commercial uses contemplated by this amendment to serve the surrounding residential areas cannot be ascertained/has not been demonstrated. • Adverse environmental impacts will not result from this amendment. Staff finds that the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment does not support the proposed changes to introduce a new Subdistrict by redesignating the subject site from the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. - 12 - CP-2013-10/ PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CP-2013-10, as submitted, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation not to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend transmittal as proposed by petitioner, staff recommends the following revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. only — not intended to change allowable uses, intensities, development standards or other items of substance): Note: Words underlined are added — as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words are deleted—as proposed by staff. Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element: 17. Vincentian Mixed- Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains a••roximatel 30.68 acres aii44 is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East US 41 1S ^"TaFai m! Tr^i! Eoot as=slisami and is desicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to ar=avide allow for a=mktura=of neighborhoods e€ community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use commercial and residential) development. : - —_ _ _ _- —__-- _ _—___—__ —:_—__ __ _ _ liaadawactapr The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict and/or the •rester Nail-s area, and -= ---=-----=_=-_-=_---—•-_-_-= to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. --_ _==:-- -- _—_ _ = _— - - =_— _ __ _ —=—The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: Ilewc all thew eemmoreial a. Allowable uses: All uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, both by right and iy es conditional uses, as listed in the Collier Count Land Develosment Code in effect as if the date of adoption of this Subdistrict,Yexcept as prohibited --=- -- --- _== •=• -— -—_ _ _ =.! ___-'> __ below. b. --=_ = -_- = = _= =s_...: _=_- ==_ _ • Prohibited uses: 1. Pawn shops (5932), 2. Adult book stores, adult video rental or sales, or any other use that is defined as a "sexually oriented business" in the Collier County Code of Laws, 26-151 et seq., 3. Animal specialty services except veterinary (0752); except outside kenneling and dog grooming are permitted, 4. Automatic merchandising machine operators (5962), 5. Correctional institutions (9223), 6. Crematories (7261), 7. Farm product raw materials (5153-5159), 8. Fishing, commercial (0912-0919), - 13 — CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A 9. Fuel dealers (5983-5989), 10. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens, 11. Installation or erection of building equipment contractors (1796), 12. Local and suburban passenger transportation (4131-4173), 13. Marinas (4493 & 4499) , 14. Motor vehicle dealers, used only (5521), 15. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified (7299), Coin operated service machine operations, Comfort station operation, Escort service, Locker rental, Massage parlors (except those employing licensed therapists), Rest room operation, Tattoo parlors, Turkish baths, Wedding chapels, privately operated, 16. Power laundries, family and commercial (7211), and 17. Transfer stations (4212). c. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall will be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area (GLFA), a and one hotel ( maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted livin. facilit maximum FAR 0.6 . 2. Residential development shall will be limited to a maximum density of 11.74 unitsi per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the pfaleat property, inclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed used Lresidential and commercial uses), the residential density lia4itatriaa allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size , f u~ ef ' m tcd :c and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GLFA of commercial Naigtibaraial uses, and a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR and an Assisted Livin• Facilit at a 0.6 FAR. Commercial uses shall be limited to those uses permitted b ri•ht in the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts. 4. Under any of the development scenarios above, the average weekday pm peak hour entering/exiting trip generation shall not exceed 1,107 total trips. 5. _=- = - = Onl one automobile service station is allowed: it ma be located anywhere within the Subdistrict except for mixed use develosment shall be limited to the commercial tract. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association with a .roce store or membership warehouse t se facilit are allowed --_ __ --= =- 6. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts, d. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD, Planned Unit Development_ The rezone ordinance shall contain develosment and desi.n standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to insure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surroundins land uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified planned develosment submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. - 14 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A 5. 4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 6. 5. Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 7. 6. The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building height, but not less than 25 feet. 9. 7. At the time of Site Development, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off-site, except that remaining portions of preserve on-site shall be a minimum of one acre in size. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. 10. 8. Residential development shall be limited to a market-rate•rental apartment project _-_ :=_- -=-==-== _ --- := = :_ -- : ____ _ -- - Gre*Hity. As a second alternative: IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend transmittal - but without the residential component and limiting commercial uses to non-regional commercial development - staff recommends the following revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. AND to eliminate the residential component, attempt to limit commercial to non-regional uses, and limit building floor area): Note: Words underlined are added - as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words are deleted -as proposed by staff. Insert on Page-1-0 11 of the Future Land Use Element: Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict - 15 — CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict B. URBAN -COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict 2. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** *** 11. Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict 12. Vincentian Commercial Subdistrict Insert on Page 26 of the Future Land Use Element: 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Mixod ; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Commercial Subdistrict. in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element: 17. Vincentian Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, aod is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) ' 'S 11 T mismi Tr^;' E.,0+ as=s14oAALR and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to or.wide allow for a=i2i4ktufs=of lakekitailaf-Mdad e€ community commercial development, ; ___--_-_ -__-__-__-- -- ____-_-_ -__. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict and/or the greater Naples area, and _---_=-_ -= = - _ =_ _=- _- _ = to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. - _-- ==_: _-s -= -_--= - = ==- -•:: '_ _- • =_ _ The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions. limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses: All uses allowed by right in the C-4 zoning districts, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict, - 16 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A geaditialial=uaaa exce.t as .rohibited 44Fse€34.&ted below. b. -=== _-...__-._____-_ =- -=:= =_- ._ - __ • -= Prohibited uses: 1. Amusement and recreation services, indoor. 2. Automotive vehicle and equipment dealers (5511 and 5599. new vehicles only). 3. Bowling centers, indoor(7933). 4. Motorcycle dealers (5571). S . •• •• • • 1 • - c. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall wit# be limited to a maximum of 200,000 2E,04249 square feet of gross leasable floor area (GLFA), a b _ _—.— _ '--_ —_—-=_-- _, and an assisted living facility(izaa, maximum FAR 0.6). III • . . 4. 2. Under any of the development scenarios above, the average weekday pm peak hour entering/exiting trip generation shall not exceed 1,107 total trips. - 17- CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A 5. 3. Only one automobile service station is allowed; it may be located Refniitted anywhere within the Subdistrict. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association with a •roce store or membershi• warehouse t .e facilit are allowed ja&r=mitteszt. 6. 4. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts, d. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD, Planned Unit Development__ , '.'h oh m of The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure com•atibilit with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to insure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with o+tho +,.v o of the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified •lanned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 5. 4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 6. 5. Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 7. 6. The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building height, but not less than 25 feet. 9. 7. At the time of Site Development, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off-site, except that remaining portions of preserve on-site shall be a minimum of one acre in size. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. . . Insert on Page 141 of the Future Land Use Element: Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map - 18 - CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian ormm- '. Subdistrict Ma• - 19 — CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A PREPARED BY: ,IkAI1Al / 1t DATE: i /, • Corby Schmid AICP, Principa Planner Comprehensiv:. Planning Section, Planning And Zoning Department REVIEWED B i-4-e-----,V �✓`— DATE: g-v-iii David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Plan Manager Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning And Zoning Department REVIEWED BY: DATE: P--1/-Alf Mike Bosi,AICP, Director, Planning And Zoning Department APPRO I BY: Al iiipper. DATE: V-I - ' if k, salanguida, ;minis rato Growth Management Division PETITION NO.: CP-2013-10/ PL-2013-0001767 Staff Report for the August 21, 2014, CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the October 14, 2014, BCC Meeting. CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict E\ Plf RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 12 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 360 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF.60 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .60. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-5 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL FAST) IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 31 ± ACRES. [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Petitioner, Robert J. Mulhere FAICP of 1-sale Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA on behalf of Global Properties; LLC,has initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map an Map Series; and Words underlined are additions; Words sk-thfough,are deletions 1 *** *** ***' ***are a break in text PL.201300017671CP-2013-10 7117/14 1 r ,t A gu /2 WHEREAS, on , the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on the Board of County Commissioners, at a i public hearing, approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184,F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty(30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty(30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.;and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty(180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 1 63.3184,F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3),F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that; The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion,second and majority vote this day of ,2014. ATTEST; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman I Words underlined are additions;Words struck through are deletions 2 *** *** *** *** are a break in text PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 7/17/14 Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko' Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit"A"—text and maps CP114-CMP-00431',2 � E 4 k( Words underlined are additions;Words struck are deletions 3 *** *** *** *** are a break in text PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 7/17/14 EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED GMPA AMENDMENT LANGUAGE Insert on Page 10 of the Future Land Use Element: Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 7/11/2014 F:\Comp.Planning\GMP Amendment Cycles\Transmittal Process\CCPC\Staff Reports\Current Staff Repo its\PL20130001767_CP- 2013-10\Exhibit A's\Exhibit A GMPA Text_7-11-2014.docx Insert on Page 26 of the Future Land Use Element: 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; Vincentian Mixed-Use Subdistrict; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 7/11/2014 F:\Comp.Planning\GMP Amendment Cycles\Transmittal Process\CCPC\Staff Reports\Current Staff Reports\PL20130001767_CP- 2013-10\Exhibit A's\Exhibit A GMPA Text_7-11-2014.docx Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element: 17. Vincentian Mixed-Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, and is located on the south/west side of U.S. 41/Tamiami Trail East, as shown on the Sub district Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for a mixture of neighborhood or community commercial development; residential development; and other employment generating uses such as corporate headquarters. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and potentially allow for office uses that would provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In addition, the Subdistrict provides the alternative of residential or mixed use development. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The Subdistrict allows all those commercial uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, both by right and as conditional uses, with the exception of the prohibited uses, listed below. The following uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: 1. Pawn shops (5932), 2. Adult book stores, adult video rental or sales, or any other use that is defined as a "sexually oriented business" in the Collier County Code of Laws, 26-151 et seq., 3. Animal specialty services except veterinary (0752); except outside kenneling and dog grooming are permitted, 4. Automatic merchandising machine operators (5962), 5. Correctional institutions (9223), 6. Crematories (7261), 7. Farm product raw materials (5153-5159), 8. Fishing, commercial (0912-0919), 9. Fuel dealers (5983-5989), 10. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens, 11. Installation or erection of building equipment contractors (1796), 12. Local and suburban passenger transportation(4131-4173), 13. Marinas (4493 &4499) , 14. Motor vehicle dealers, used only (5521), 15. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified (7299), Coin operated service machine operations, Comfort station operation, Escort service, Locker rental, Massage parlors (except those employing licensed therapists), Rest room operation, Tattoo parlors, Turkish baths, Wedding chapels, privately operated, 16. Power laundries, family and commercial (7211), and Words Underlined are added, words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 7/11/2014 F:\Comp.Planning\GMP Amendment Cycles\Transmittal Process\CCPC\Staff Reports\Current Staff Reports\PL20130001767_CP- 2013-10\Exhibit A's\Exhibit A GMPA Text_7-11-2014.docx 17. Transfer stations (4212). Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses will be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet, a hotel (max. FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (max. FAR 0.6). 2. Residential will be limited to a maximum density of 11.74 units/acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the project, inclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. 3. A single (one) automobile service station may be permitted anywhere within the Subdistrict. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility may be permitted. 4. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts, Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD, Planned Unit Development, which must contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted at the time of Site Development. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of Site Development will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross- access agreements. 4. If the subject site is developed with residential uses only, the project will provide a minimum of 60 percent open space. Otherwise, the minimum open space shall be 30 percent. 5. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 6. Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 7. The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building height, but not less than 25 feet. 8. At the time of rezoning, the developer shall provide restrictions and standards to insure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 9. If the subject site is developed as commercial, 15 percent of the on-site native vegetation must be retained. If the subject site is developed as residential or mixed-use (both residential and commercial), the required minimum on-site native vegetation is 25 Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 7/11/2014 F:\Comp.Planning\GMP Amendment Cycles\Transmittal Process\CCPC\Staff Reports\Current Staff Reports\PL20130001767_CP- 2013-10\Exhibit A's\Exhibit A GMPA Text_7-11-2014.docx percent. At the time of Site Development, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off- site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. Words Underlined are added, words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 7/11/2014 F:\Comp.Planning\GMP Amendment Cycles\Transmittal Process\CCPC\Staff Reports\Current Staff Reports\PL20130001767_CP- 2013-10\Exhibit A's\Exhibit A GMPA Text_7-11-2014.docx Insert on Page 141 of the Future Land Use Element: (VIII) Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map (XIV) Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map (XIV) Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map (I) Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (VI) Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map (VI) Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map (VI) Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (XIV) Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map (VI) Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (VI) Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (XIX) Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict (XXI) Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (XXI) Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map (XXI) Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map (XXX) Coastal High Hazard Area Map (XXX) Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Words Underlined are added, words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 7/11/2014 F:\Comp.Planning\GMP Amendment Cycles\Transmittal Process\CCPC\Staff Reports\Current Staff Reports\PL20130001767_CP- 2013-10\Exhibit A's\Exhibit A GMPA Text_7-11-2014.docx p I T 48 8 I T 47 S I T 48 S I T 49 S I T 50 S I T 51 S I T 52 S I T 53 S g g g M CD Qz S S g _ gg 1 R 1 a 1 5 gg 8 8 R R N N < Q�Q 5 g 9 S - g °« Rg.^ 0a«x � � _ rv_R„no f .R 1!1,7. sA LL O u g5 3l3 @3 : i8 @ a 13R ,RP ili1kwi18 „1 g"g s U "a i ; € 3 b '3 a 8 wa "a �a a a a w �” "R ;« v8 e o ,_ .1 �t �_ �_ _ 7 a �: ,2 ,_ c- Y a g g t - g .<- I w 8 = a = w _ $$ =a a abaQ a& S sae 1; 11 & g8 € �, > R y w a a .1aa < < 3a < a y 4 I a s& a <LL P i E : : W w 3V sV A1N000 30V0 '= g 93 m 3 A1N000 0NVM0N9 — ▪ Y p 8 5 k' Y € / O 5 m (1 .-.;'7,8 $ S i is 80:N E g - ❑■■❑ Opn H I� U.I I± i Jw` W W A e0 a J s ce Z G g <S W €k u g`I~ GG iE E'g a 1 .S Ek' 3 E g3 3� m � e LL W ° pa 'g d a l�aaa'" z" _� g g g W ¢ 9� £ gg.:Egad as UO d ; ig = .- i _� ®p1 ¢Eq ■a■=i.o g i ■ I ❑°• 1 ®M' z °i qq3 4 > N 9 a tt N W R € eg N N ' .@61 9 =€ E ; w SL', y m A " Ir q s g ga rp, z a s ¢ a .6 p az a g -i i = s y a :. _ h o- w a — u▪ a j j @i aPgaa ; i. as6 € iox z o 0 _i. low °md aU ' a ie W W !! 1 m 1a I $F ° gg g m a hs i i I kk € Epp eo gi❑O® 2I M•Irtn/I•••®'s. ¢ = W W O „� Ln O �l t7 I � X ¢ o un b LLI — K a t W ti W i a 0 i; w ? a :f. m ' a 4 i w m N U Q¢ ¢ i w w i N 2 4E111 a z GrJ-_I""""I"I"' 1111 ' — III ��� . ,�o;r $ I jAI ix ry € ¢ a a it "i is 3d &'� tll Ai .i N e, $ m3z -.J. O CC s' ■ r••' `� '- 44 Y Iw i0 <F,z -aN'p ' (13 P W Q C O r\\`\\ . 11 wTr 4,-,,&% ‘(--, < k iii ,5 ,isit . mt: well Liar -...- ; : '"%* § Z g OSrcw Yom . e / • :: - 0; _ cc IL P n G V i �_ , , _ 0 saa _ w W H ' U a �k .ra �,7+'" r� LLl w M ee N J moo. H 61 ,o �visn-:+ CO 0 m S G.. Ln 1 a N 1041 nig i 5m= Gulf of • S 94 1 I S L4 1 1 5 94 1 I 5 84 1 I 5 04 1 I 5 15 1 S ZS 1 S SS 1 I EXHIBIT A PETITION PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 DWI VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA / Vj-• S S % .. AL ■ Ai __, • rwe 9 9y 4.,.. #337- ,,s.,, . ,,,,,4 ...... , svioft • , -,,, .# .# . \N Afr,„, • t„,,-.1,2 \ \ 11111111111111 �I1111101111111 , 111111110111111 .) S 11111111111111111 .6, # 00 9-4 S . 1O ' 90 LEGEND SCALE \\ SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY: GIS/CAD YAPPING SECTION 0 1000 FT. 2000 FT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION /PLANNING AND REGULATION DATE 7/2014 ALE CP-2013-10A.DWG APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN f P-2013 /0 ) APPLICATION NUMBER P11.02: 611301)0176.7 DATE RECEIVED D c jTj f PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE September 26, 2013 DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 (Fax 239-252-2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant: Christopher Shucart, c/o Global Properties of Naples, LLC Company Global Properties, LLC Address 2614 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 615 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-0098 Fax Number 239-692-8527 B. Name of Agents * Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP and Richard Yovanovich, Esquire • THESE ARE THE PEOPLE TP CONTACT FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Robert J. Mulhere/Hole Montes, Inc. Address 950 Encore Way City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34110 Phone Number 239-254-2000 Fax Number 239-254-2099 Company: Richard Yovanovich, Esquire/Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, PA Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-3535 Fax Number 239-435-1218 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record Global Properties of Naples, LLC Address 2614 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 615 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-0098 Fax Number 239-692-8527 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. 1 Norm Trebilcock, AICP, P.E.,Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. 1205 Piper Boulevard,Suite 202, Naples, FL 34110 Bethany Brosious,Senior Ecologist I, Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200, Fort Myers, FL 33912 II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Global Properties of Naples, LLC 100% James Shucart, Manager 97% Christopher Shucart, Manager 3% 2614 Tamiami Trail N.,Suite 615 Naples, FL 34103 2 E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (x) leased ( ): 11-3-2010 Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Attachment "A" B. GENERAL LOCATION Corner of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East Section 32, Township 50S, Range 26E, Folio No.00439880008 C. PLANNING COMMUNITY South Naples D. TAZ 311 E. SIZE IN ACRES 30±acres F. ZONING Vincentian PUD G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN See Attachment "B" H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict and Coastal High Hazard Area Overlay 3 IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element X Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) OF THE ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Attachment "B" C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Urban Designation, Mixed Uses District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, TO Urban Designation, Mixed Use District , Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit A-1 Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit A-2 Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries,source, and date. Exhibit A-3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit B-1 Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands,with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. 4 C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit C-1 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit C-1 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so,identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5%of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes,indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-11.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit E-2 Potable Water(See attached Public Facilities Report) Exhibit E-2 Sanitary Sewer (See attached Public Facilities Report) Exhibit E-3 Arterial &Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS (See attached Traffic Impact Statement) N/A Drainage N/A Solid Waste N/A Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public 5 facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit E-1 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection,schools and emergency medical services. 3. Attachment "B" Document proposed services and public facilities,identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exhibit F-1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence,if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary,if applicable Y Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Y $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) N/A $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Y Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Y 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1"=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. 6 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION, TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN • We hereby authorize Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP and Richard Yovanovich, Esquire (Name of Agents) to serve as our Agents in •. equest to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting propert '.e titled in th' . •tion. 0 - s� /73 Signed: __ .0 Dater /lobal Properties of Naples, LLC J_ ,s Shucart M• ager Signed: . Date: l - •al Properties of Naples, LLC Christopher Shucart, Manager We hereby certify that we have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true,correct and complete to the bes . •ur knowle. gnature of Applicant vi James Shucart,Manager • N. e=l ype•.. _ • inted --- - ----- --- �ure of App ant Christopher Shucart, Manager Name-Typed or Printed STATE OF . ( Ck. :YL ) COUNTY OF ( Cull vg.; ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this '24 day of OC4' ,2013" by E -2 MY COM Qua x. --9 �3 6 L! , . Notary Public "<-,, ANN R.TOMLINSON f • `,• .., '\ - Notary Mile-State of Flaw .. it CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 117 :.<s My Gahm.Expires Apr 23,201 t J�� crFul CommiSSiur Ak FF 11307 __:X___. who is personally known to me, - ' who has produced as identification an did take an Oath ``• = 4�' AiIRKTO1111t,Fl if did not take and Oath �� S. Many Milo'lgNof fiarits NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: ' .t, Celini+•FAA 33,3Qt1 • .1„: Commission*FF'11307 Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: . "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in r1 the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of%500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 7 INSTR 4492154 oft 4620 PG 1385 RECORDED 11/3/2010 2:26 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROOK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DoC @.70 $14,175.00 REC $27.00 CONS $2,025,000.00 I This Document Prepared By and Return to: Mark S.Weinberg,Esq. GrayRobinson,P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue,Suite 1600 Miami,FL 33131 Parcel ID Number: 00439880008 . . Speci 1� . ^ a .iv eed f , r 7 .. - This Indenture, Made this y 2010 A.D., Between, Special Acquisitions Holdings, Inc.,.a cc rpor�rti n i i F la s 4f e State of Florida, grantor, and Global Properties of Naples,LL 1Qri.∎/ '• ie. 1 • 'i ity pn p y . hose address is: 2614 Tamiami. Trail North,Suite 615,Naples,Floe 4 r, : -. `-- Witnesseth that the GRANTOR,for and in k eration of the sum of-- ` °jTEN DOLLARS $10 DOLLARS,and other good an *it e consideration to GRAN A4and paid by GRANTEE,the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,has granted,bargained and s l aid GRANTEE and•-` NTEE'S heirs, successors and assigns forever,the . following described land,situate,lying and being in the C`bnnfy , C� gorida to wit: . SEE ATTA\CHED EDIT"A" Subject to: • 1.Real estate taxes for the year 2010 and subsequent years;and 2. Covenants,restrictions,and public utility easements of record,without any intention to re-impose same; and existing zoning and governmental regulations. AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land;and Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land against claims arising by,through or under the Grantor and will defend same against the claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor,but none other. In Witness Whereof,the grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. /'\ OR 4620 PG 1386 Signed,sealed and delivered in our presence: " Special Acquisitions Holdings,Inc. ,, By: (CXJYIk� )LL1J'-L" (Seal) 11u1�.. � — $Y• Printed Name: YONG ka.t.1 4 OA.� ).�$ Alma Shucichart Witness Title: Vice President P.O.Address:6435 Naples Boulevard Naples,FL 34109 tidki,17/_/-) (Corporate Seal) Printed Name: a,,na )1,1-)'h s Witness • STATE OF Florida 9 COT3I TY OF Collier S-------Th // 2010 The foregoing instrument was ckrbw d ed ` �fe me this,2 day f i/Jode Ler- by Alma Shuckhart, as Vice Pres den of S cir I feu io stgs, Inc., a Florida Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is e s,#ialy moo•°n o .�e a• paid= his Florida driver's license as �, I identification. ; -ai - t;,t�,,,,,� DONNA M.THRUSH ' q- Printed Nam / ran _° ��e Nancy Pu61tc-SE�s of Ftcrkl Notary Publ•e-. a, t+ty Comm.Expkras Jul T,2814 C1,4-,' ��4 .,ices'���( c� a o,; Commission#DD 49$753- - gg`ion' r �Q/ Uonded ihroLigh Katona ttotuy Asm. v3�'e✓ • • ** OR 4620 PG 1387 .s� EiXRBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, TOWNSI3ID' 50 SOUTH, RANGE FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46"WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32,A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN - WAY LINE INTERSECTION WTH THE SOU'T 4 � � � . `OTNT OF OF U.S.HIGHWAY NO.41(T ! ' °A141„,48.40 WEST BEGINNING; THENCE CONT I ` SOUTH 02 itQ \ ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SEO` IO 2, ADISTANF$84.02 FEET TO THE EAST QU Eft C�3I2NR SECTOl 32 AND THE NORTH LINE O LC I ' A.CItES AS RECORDED IN:II, . T 0 94° T UNIT 3 , � c� .� AA.�' PUBLIC RECORDS OF C041"�t }. 1, s z 13Y INSTRUMENTRECORI�D 1 1 FIC�AR1th D _) i89, THENCE RUN Q1iTH 87°30'18"WEk_ 1 NGSAID FORMER ER ID ACRES a 71'HE FORMER I�IORTH LINE O T 4 AS RECD E!D*PLAT NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES ��.� � ��OLLIER BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID P In kf- -1,.i. •RD O. `` COUNTY,FLORIDA,A.DISTANCE O b'm,96 HENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 OF- TO INTERSECTION S. HIGHWAY NO.1 (ANIIAMI ��L); OF-WAY THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26"EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY;THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAD) CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY FEET TO DISTANCE OF THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. • • �-. ATTACHMENT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLI FR COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIHR COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIATVII TRAIL) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 884.02 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS FORMERLY IN TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 94 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIF,R COUNTY, FLORIDA (VACATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 189, PAGE 792); THENCE RUN NORTH 87°30'18" WEST ALONG SAID FORMER NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLI N.R COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 695.96 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIA_MI TRAIL); THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. ATTACHMENT "B" JUSTIFICATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is located at the "T" intersection of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail East). See GMPA Attachment "A" for the legal description of the subject parcel. The subject parcel is 30.68 acres +/- in size. The land use designation is presently Urban, Mixed Use District Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, in the Coastal High Hazard Area Overlay. The property is zoned PUD, allowing for residential uses, ALF, and commercial (a variety of C-3 uses, all C-2 uses, and several C-4 uses). The PUD does not provide a specific breakdown of acreage dedicated to commercial use; however, the master plan depicts about +/-8.0 acres in the commercial tract(s) leaving +/- 22.6 acres to be calculated for residential density (yielding +/-90 dwelling units). The PUD has been sunsetted. The surrounding lands, on the south/west side of US 41 are all designated Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. The lands across U.S. 41 (to the north/east) are designated Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The zoning and actual lands use on surround lands is as follows: North: Vacant C-5 commercial, Trail Acres RSF 4 (developed) and across U.S. 41 Whistler's Cove PUD Multifamily Development East: Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, Zoned "MH"; and Hitching Post Commercial Plaza, Zoned "C-3"; across US 41, Eagle Lakes Community Park "P" and County owned lands for wastewater reclamation area, Zoned "A" Ag. South: Trail Acres RSF 4 (developed) West: Trail Acres RSF 4 (developed) TREE TOPS C-3 k <,y;\ WHISTLERS COVE COWER COUNTY PLO ° PUD PROPERTY -7\A y //, \,\ A ZONING \ \ TRAIL AIRES 8 ,,./* - k (RSF-4•f \. -if /,'- . �% SLBJECT PA&CFL COMMUNITY PARK ' %'- ,/ti' VINGENTIAN P ZONING >• i '\ N 4.0 / e a‘, N ., ').,,,t‘4,/�, ' 4 4 I �� '\ ,J! 3 17/'`.\\N ,`. IINCoop-3 N. ` FE f-27. l( r ` TRAGRES HITCHING POST �..� MOBILE HOME PARK RF-4 f tII sx e w WENTWORTH iy � 4 [ 7 I 1 tdy ESTATES '�^`�-�--i PI in H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Attachment B Justification 7-31-14.docx Requested Changes This proposed GMPA would change the designation from Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, to Urban Mixed Use District, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. This will require amending the FLUE and the FLUM. The new Subdistrict will allow for commercial, residential, or mixed-use (commercial and residential) development. Justification for Request The present PUD allows for approximately eight (8) acres of commercial development, with the remaining acreage for residential development at a density not to exceed four(4) units/acre. The subject parcel is unique in that there are very few potential commercial parcels under unified control that have the shape and size that will allow for a variety of options for commercial uses that are desirable in East Naples along the U.S. 41 E ast Corridor. The East Naples Civic Association, several years ago, conducted a preliminary U.S. 41 East corridor planning study. As part of that study, this piece of property was recommended to be a "commercial activity center." This nomenclature should not be confused with the defined Mixed Use Activity Centers located at major intersections in Collier County, but rather a label used to indicate this property's values as a large commercial tract that could accommodate a mixture of commercial uses to serve the East Naples Community. The area would benefit from additional commercial development. This is true both from a market perspective and from a "good for the community" perspective. The change in land use '~ designation will allow for the possibility of a variety of commercial uses and even a corporate headquarter type use such as a Hertz or Arthrex type corporation, or market-rate apartments with or without mixed-use (neighborhood commercial uses). While the FLUE does not explicitly require a commercial needs or market analysis with the submittal of a commercial rezone outside of a Mixed Use Activity Center, a market analysis is provided as additional supporting data and analysis. The study identifies a need for additional commercial uses and a deficiency in lands designated for commercial development to accommodate these uses. Given the size of developable area for residential and the relatively low density now permitted, we do not feel that such low-density residential is feasible in the current market.The site is competing with several large-scale PUDs (consisting of hundreds or thousands of acres) within reasonable proximity (3 miles) of the subject parcel, including Lely Resort, Treviso Bay, Sabal Bay, and Winding Cypress. These master planned communities can offer single-family homes with significant amenities, such as multiple swimming pools, tennis courts, and golf courses. The subject site does not have sufficient space to provide a similarly amenitized community. The table below lists approved PUDs within three miles of the subject site and a count of approved and developed units. These PUDs contain more than 10,000 approved, un-built dwelling units. H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Attachment B Justification 7-31-14.docx ,--r Active PUDs with Un-built Residential Units Acreage Total Units Total Units Total Units Within 3 miles Approved Developed Un-built Artesa Point 280 204 76 81.00 Eagle Creek 470 456 14 298.00 Lands End Preserve 725 78 647 262.90 Lely Resort 10,150 3,805 6,345 2,892.50 Mandalay 84 71 13 28.06 Rockedge 400 - 400 76.42 Sabal Bay(Isles of Collier) 1,999 - 1,999 2,416.08 Shadowwood 574 104 470 168.10 Sierra Meadows 300 36 264 90.80 Wentworth Estates(Treviso Bay) 1,450 214 1,236 1,563.84 Winding Cypress 2,300 1,686 614 1,928.00 TOTAL 18,732 6,654 12,078 9,805.70 Source: Collier County PUD Master List Dated 12/20/13 Additionally, the strongest market attraction within the communities identified above is for a fee- simple development (i.e. condominiums) with a quick return on investment for the developer. As a result, there is a strong demand for market-rate rental apartments. This site is well-situated to provide such market-rate rental apartments, due to its access and exposure to an arterial or collector roadway. A Rental Apartment Survey is submitted as supporting data and analysis for this use. In order to address concerns raised by the neighborhood, the Subdistrict limits residential development to market-rate rental apartments, as there is a substantial amount of affordable housing already provided in the area. Whistler's Cove is an affordable housing rental community. In addition, Habitat for Humanity has several dwelling units already constructed or proposed to be constructed in the area. The GMP prohibits the concentration of affordable housing in one area of the County. The average density of market-rate rental apartments in Collier County is approximately 13 units/acre (see the Rental Apartment Survey), and we consider around 12 units/acre (calculated on gross acreage, inclusive of commercial portions) to be the minimum necessary to attract a developer and a high-quality design. As this project is within the Coastal High Hazard Area, discussions were held with Emergency Management regarding appropriate hurricane evacuation mitigation. Emergency Management requested that a portable generator be provided, if more than 123 dwelling units are constructed, and this commitment will be included in the implementing PUD. H:\20I3\20I3043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Attachment B Justification 7-31-I4.docx The Subdistrict also permits the site to be developed as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. In order to provide flexibility for a mixed-use developer, but establish reasonable constraints on the total development allowed, the amount of commercial acreage and square footage is reduced in a mixed-use development scenario. The total number of trips that can be generated by that development is also capped, establishing an overriding limit on total development intensity. The proposed GMPA to create the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict is justified based upon the community's desires, the long range growth potential in this area, access to the arterial road system, and the fact that the site has been established, through the PUD process, as an appropriate location for commercial, residential, and mixed-use development. Environmental Overview See the Environmental Data Summary prepared by Passarella and Associates. Traffic/Transportation Overview See the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Services. Conclusion The request to create the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict is justified and will better serve the needs of the community than the existing permissible land uses. H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Attachment B Justification 7-3I-14.docx cx/ 1 'ka ! ,., -. '....;:'?-4:711-4.;r7---- 2-j g .fl--,1/2-10, ..; r-''''.,7 k' ._ 1"=-'1 tea. ._ k'..-a7;f's5 e•dx ,',` '�a.. f , ..`Y-ti a r.7 y,:- ;4 _i ---!.�' `,t t 7 9 '.!' -. 1 £t 1 } � x�~ ' W[.1 y :1[�' ' _ii}�� 71 1- - S,r r n[5 ar'i rV,A.,,,1 1 �fy f,P"ca i t 7 ci _,3,u�, y t ' -.,�c-as.-,.� t e r t - '3,: l .. ,Y f ,t vc 7 �t '-°4_ T .7 F !x ;_erg?:, .st' tt?...,j✓ ,I .4.,-i e� ?6s-.$f_-t ;,t, ,,t ,4i, -,_ .-.. , ir: t , 7►ta , 't-4 t r.F 1. :4_'�3 -`� 1` _ a,-z a"a,tl`'.e.ri "�'3e 44;-_,.,_,..,-,---,I,_-- t . - it x . i M L- _ '- -t","-4E:17 2} ip k c y4 .. ,: . 4•A'f' -'' Y PLC v 4-a'''-'y 'S _*'1''p'- ..- • .g I t 7t t ..d f '+k 0, 'bS`..5 -- � d.., Y`?�t: 'r" ��T- `3yr ! ,. y��'S�Ty.._ i rI'1 .-, -- :�.r a- .'may yvei` 1lliii111-- — -T"'i, r '`-t F s.� ti .- ,i i s ---,^' i :` ti • ,,. •w ,,,„. .. .Y, •y � a.�9�t`��` j+m' r p,----14—..,„11,:. ``{�Sq >".b4• +'- g.. - 3 S- 'j `,f i t om.-.a"+3 r4'� •x p f2 r{:, s -. 3 !' ,-. -i `i€f r �.a 6 e g- -t• t. g i`�—ki :Z S 1 t a- 6 3 ��. - :fir iJIra zY�; ..r :,'� ' 1 4 -' f? y f .>t.:.� ly " !K' r al.. - _.L'.. z . ` '5 =.- ' r F- z „ y� +J r$ -e4 e Y --- `4. a -.. a _� ; '• .... . S N,e .t 5 1 z > ;X41' t = ,.7 _.r +'. 4! �. a r{• � ,`f+ ... � `Pc 2 .4-!_::';',_=:::---!',---J t, , . d ..ar ,,�. :.I s71" r c t.• s F�. , rr- .`- ��y? ci s S ti F ro r-' f 7i `;1 E ,*`S .-1, ' . ors t :#f b A.3 t>; ��„ ..„.....t...,.....„. >/'` = _ � `t, [' " ' , I• pus s s :.r�e� tF".r s� 1 i a�(`5 L Y ' f -� ' �� { t:3 1}Y"r is •t f "tea ,p *a'_ `.4,.'r r. Di v °3.. 4 r 8t �. +,N r i p _ i •; �Y c.., . , Z /_,,..,L,:/,-;.0./.^; s( t_ , fit_. PSA� tea 7 r.?;.a R. n t 37 3Hi� S.01,,,I,..7.-,Y ` . �e'=tc� t £ i i[Fy s. a �� i�lt •} z R�w� s ? "•• _Sr' r,, SAL---ti '-7 �+y�T��r r '.may �`.1' * .j "�..4 _ I �.f�,a ;'e -Y' l 1 '"'y, -4._ tr t 1 n ".ilk r .. .7_ £'<i Y✓,, - ..,r',•s,.�,._>r/ s y ��.s {.;-i ,.tr r *' f' ,'-'. f'<i" r Y f� t,•..t °L .r., 'y, ••5� ��e,e. - .. .a'.c.7_ • . i� z 5i1 ? : 'rY- •r 4 e � }'�`C. "r } - l �� �s S - lit` 't'� �4 41 - tr Z P,�xt,5,,,..fi;,+. ,1 s-� .s!_ r i:Y` +f : .r 3 n art T'- f[7. :�.�.� ''.� r 3 -r :'�.lr} 41 --- .�� it ". �:,"� MY+ •L;. i '.' y = JJ]] # 7 §c-, .+ 4_:-.y .w �_. e ,6 .3._ ,-1T�.y= r_ r 'FJ� ;- ,(, 1, .f .:F- TL- ,ate C • ''p..ei / _� e' - -: -4 z y: 3 i tr a _ } --- :-fit .r'� _ -f -iG � r z• a--• may- c;:: ,-r r -. l-' , s.- - ,.}• -i }, p —It.-om 4..5.,.,! 4- •4 i •• ••t ` ,y. :. 1 i 4 .. -. t ,�... ��, t-+S- i- } .1• ,r 4;� .f.-�-.•, 9-- r t 7.`..4.:,:4:.;..!.:,-4-,... .a f ,, _ _ G 1-.•--",;,.)-- _ r J'-.•F i t X7,10 Y=' [ v• ,t r "'a�: S 'r'b a ' tc `i' s. t;.t. S' i� y- '4.�Y. F. t 4 f 1‘-r-'..'-'• ,v . +'�' r•1. '• ,- 3` tt tt 4s ' .' -�,, 1-7 - y }.ef- t' �,-*. 3S ..fir'`'''''' zrF<t :1,--.. �'. • f 7i- "-- t,y a t R ;r- --Z ; r ti y'+ P �3 # l5 �✓'; x ta44 't Y' = ' ra a {.�r s = ;y`"'' a��. hi _� w�.s -t`z rs r�-` rr t � :. `f« .. ,,,...4.-e, ►r � -r-�*}�� R S`4 7 [F'CS: � F 56�� 1: �` �C.:,y �fxs!� � ' �- 1 � JI.—. 3 f��� l .fL t T' -+/ �[ _ ,�. ♦ t -�g_,� s• f, •l 7 7 xs ,. 7 x -• ••ff".Sy r ,- i .�l'y[i a+'.-._larP t it f N� ,x r�r e7 ri 5 °�-� � Y�i 'y• _r`_•,t� . I„ 3'�t 3 A-- ° -- r tiJ y ,2.-�.i $ aS'c zrr= A. ,,,,,...AL% ` ,L� ' .i` F n� er.. 4, a !, i `.. i �� i > �':�'� z 5 sr� - t- t ''h - -r., `' _..-r r I P 3y� - . -i -r)a- ..� i-t1: a.K -mod .5..Y -fs7 A_ 4' M' i ��' per,T 's {Y. � { d �3�r � �� c� � y n �� fk �' �r �� ..,..;,=, i X �` s' 'i-rtt :.i c g r•n -l` ar -yi`zs ,h� , F .i a .' t1 .c..S„.„ , .s: t cv f ' :� -i 't--S Y. - t�i _ S r S�c a e• ,......„..t,z,..{ ° ,_1, -Y. �`�--; y .,,...1,y L F .f 'gyp• .c A +`It - .e C Vision for the .‘,..,„.,, ,..,--,,,_.... ;'4'. ,,,,,,-,!..41 0 East Trail Corridor __ ,,,...:.:-..,-. rr''- tip}-. (...,R'"8� "Cr. . •ftdYl✓ i iii Vii ,• '11 to Ili/ /t17 1 ATTACHMENT "C" Vision fin. the Ea f '; r��ri1 Corridor Table of Contents Introduction I Master Plan Study Process Context 3 History Land Use Characteristics Circulation Population Characteristics Neighborhoods and Housing Conditions Economic Conditions and Trends Environmental Characteristics Past Planning Efforts East Trail Visioning Process 10 /""' Public Involvement. Applicable Planning Principles The East Trail Vision Statement 14 Goals& Strategies Attachment: Vision Concept Plan Appendix: Demographic page from Economic Development Council of Collier County's"Market Facts 2008-2009" Public Input Meeting documents Vision for the East Trail Corridor The East Naples Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is continuing the community project initiated by the East Naples Civic Association's Strategic Planning Committee. This project is an endeavor to create a plan to promote planned growth for the future of the "East Trail" (Tamiami Trail East / U.S. 41 East) corridor in Collier County. The East Naples Foundation envisions development along the East Trail over time according to a community based master plan. This is not about the road itself. This effort is not an evaluation of how many lanes or how much asphalt should be poured on US 41. This vision for the future focuses on the property, the buildings, and the features along the East Trail. These features will ultimately be developed and redeveloped in a way that either contributes to or detracts from a sense of identity, character, place and functionality for the people who live along and travel the corridor. The Study Area is a stretch of approximately 14 miles beginning at Airport Pulling Road adjacent to the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area' to County Road 92. The Study Area covers a long distance of roadway with varied characteristics and multiple functions serving both travelers and neighbors. The functions of the corridor span the spectrum, from the northernmost portions that can serve as a "main street" for established communities in East Naples, to the southernmost portion that is a scenic route through the Collier-Seminole State Park and rural agricultural lands. The future character of the corridor will be dictated over the next twenty years as many currently developed sites reach the end of their structural and functional lives, and many undeveloped lands face development pressure. The East Naples Foundation identifies the need to focus the activity, growth and opportunities of the corridor in a way that best and most efficiently serve the people living, working, owning land, or doing business along the East Trail corridor. The East Naples Foundation has undertaken this planning effort for the following purpose: To develop a Master Plan for the U.S.41 Tamiami Trail corridor which will encourage planned growth, both commercial and residential, that is compatible with the unique natural resources of the area, resulting in an enhanced quality of life for all residents. The East Trail Corridor Study Area defined for this planning effort does encompass some property within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) boundary, however the recommendations of this Vision for the East Trail Corridor are only for Iands outside of the CRA boundary. Any reference to property within the CRA boundary is only conceptual in nature, and is not intended to alter or vary from the CRA's Redevelopment Plan that guides and governs all future development within the CRA. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 1 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Master Plan Study Process The objective of this master planning effort is to anticipate, plan and identify adjustments to regulatory framework so that the East Trail corridor grows viably while protecting quality of life. Current conditions have been documented and analyzed. Community interests have been defined and prioritized in this Vision for the future. This Vision will ultimately be translated into a master plan document complete with goals, policies, and implementation mechanisms that ensure sustained adherence to principles of the plan. The following outline provides the detailed steps of this master planning effort. Steps 1 and 2 have already been completed. This Vision document fulfills Step 3. 1. Existing Conditions Inventory — Professional planners, engineers and ecologists collected, tabulated, and mapped existing conditions along the corridor, including: corridor boundaries, land use, zoning, utilities, drainage, transportation, demographics, and design characteristics. 2. Public Workshop— A meeting was held March 30, 2009 to display collected data and solicit input from the community and stakeholders to identify the area's strengths and weaknesses,likes and dislikes, and desires for the future. 3. Vision — Professional planning consultants prioritize the goals and objectives of the community within the framework of existing conditions and potential for the future. The vision is embodied in a statement document and an image that conveys both the concept for the development of the corridor and the illustration of the segments,gateways,nodes, opportunities and constraints along the corridor. 4. East Trail Plan — This plan document will outline the goals, objectives and policies that provide a framework for the development community and the public agencies to achieve an outcome consistent with the vision for the corridor. The East Trail Plan will provide the following: background data and analysis, and guidelines for planned transportation, land use and urban design elements. The Plan will also identify necessary improvements and recommended methods and criteria to achieve the desired results. Recommended methods may include: incentives, performance standards, form based codes or new development standards. 5. Public Input—A second meeting will be held with the community and stakeholders to gather input and answer questions related to the draft Corridor Plan. 6. Adoption — Collier County staff, Advisory Boards and Commissioners must review and consider the Plan for adoption. 7. Implementation — After the Plan is adopted, the implementation of the plan may involve: Growth Management Plan amendments, such as new Future Land Use designations, overlays or commercial location criteria; Land Development Code amendments, such as new zoning districts or overlays; capital improvement plan updates; new funding strategies; and new public outreach strategies or programs. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 2 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor eartteca � 1 � � .t .; s� d� � , , �. � a . Y . P,�.F^ s. " a 4 ws r 0.;',-. " pr J . A ``a 4 ' 5 k t a.3,.r'pe `C4 2�ni,,,#;*p-, . j, 'r :-":1 • #.' s '. i , , .itp _ ,, fir.. A° 't I ' .. .R1, ' 4 e*; ' '`''1 * -.,:,-1,.., .i• .'4` # tvrP`t irp z -;s w, ',j• s#`�` # 1 .EARLY VIEW tF TAMIAMI 1 RAIL "History of the Tamiami Trail,"Authority of the Tamiami Trail Commissioners and the County Commissioners of Dade County,Florida, 1928. History Opened in 1928, the Tamiami Trail has long provided a critical connection for the State of Florida, from Tampa to Miami. The importance of this route as a state connector has been overtaken by newer highway improvements to Interstate 75 that is now the high capacity route connecting the Fort Lauderdale area to Tampa and points north. Much of the Tamiami Trail that runs along the west coast now functions as an arterial roadway running through urban and suburban areas. Cities along the west coast have made efforts to redefine the arterial roadway to better fit their communities. These communities have found through traffic studies that the Tamiami Trail is often utilized more for local trips rather than long distance trips. This means the Trail corridor should develop with local context and character similar to a "main street" rather than a throughway in an urbanized area. Other portions of the Trail are much more scenic, where the landscape stretches for miles over agricultural lands, the Everglades, and other --- protected parklands. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 3 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor `, 41 r�Yr-;+ �*:.St`s •a ��}C` # i :• 2 Y*s 7y,,. ` '1.1,tta3`�A9,.V::":" t'' _+' 4 ;- •,R t ,;* �� Intersection withAirport Road `; f: , ,< 1;,-,..',/,.12>'*,vIlZoi,e. r„ , ,,,„.._; *41,11,7;).',1!. „,i,,,.-',„‘. ��$ �° , Intersection with C.R. 951 k !.,',../".°4' *"t --- r . '- , ,„. „„,.„,„„,,,„..,$,,.,„:„.„:474";r4..:,-. 1,.,25 7,e.,,'-.:t i p--..!,',,4A.: )''a.x tie• F# �.. i Z- 7a- ` ,y. r 4 Intersection with C.R. 92 myu ; ,•.--- 1 t t Ss fq V� y. s�` , Land Use Characteristics 40 \'' ." .,r ..;',.. : .: ,-,----1 -- -. • The development along Collier County's East Trail from Airport Road to County Road 92 is a reflection of a wide range of land uses. The Study Area defined for this East Trail Master Plan Study begins to the northwest •at the intersection of Airport Road and the East Trail, where the Collier County Government Complex is located. The southeastern terminus of the Study. Area is the intersection of County Road 92 and the East Trail, where the Collier-Seminole State Park begins. •Due to the geographic extent of the 14-mile stretch of the Study Area, the area has been divided into four segments, depicted on the attached Vision Concept Plan. All the segment lines do not correspond with major roadways because the segments were divided according to transitions in land use patterns. • Segment 1 is approximately 2 miles between Airport Pulling Road and Valley Stream Drive. Segment 1 includes Lake Avalon and the intersection of Ratt lesnake Hammock Boulevard. Johnson Engineering;Inc. 4 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor • Segment 2 is approximately 2.5 miles, from Valley Stream Drive to Navajo Trail. Segment 2 contains mostly developed or planned residential neighborhoods including Sabal Bay, Lely Country Club, Naples Manor, Treviso Bay, and Whistler's Cove. • Segment 3 is approximately 3.5 miles, from Navajo Trail to Naples Reserve Boulevard. Segment 3 includes Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, the C.R. 951 intersection, and the new Super WalMart. • Segment 4 is the longest segment, measuring approximately 6 miles, from Naples Reserve Boulevard to County Road 92. This includes Reflection Lakes, Fiddlers Creek, Six Ls Farm and Collier Seminole State Park. The corridor is characterized by the established neighborhoods of East Naples, which gradually transition to the southeast to more golf course communities and suburban and rural style development. In Segments I and 2 the commercial property along the East Trail was limited in size after the widening of US 41, so that much of the commercial land in these segments is underutilized. The corridor is bisected by the intersection at County Road 951. This intersection is an important crossroads because County Road 951 connects Naples to Marco Island going south, and connects to the I-75 interchange going north. The intersection is developing with commercial shopping centers and big box retailers. Moving to the southeast, the development along the corridor becomes more sparse, with some suburban neighborhoods and more rural and agricultural lands. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village. For this planning effort, the Study Area has been limited to properties along the East Trail within a half-mile distance from the centerline of the Trail. This half-mile dimension allows our study to encompass parks and schools that are in close proximity and are important to the corridor. The half-mile dimension also allows us to represent and evaluate walkability in the form of pedestrian sheds. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 5 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor ''� I ESTEY AVE D •YmL r (Sus Tra,-R.5 sbou! ... _ DAVIS DING p i Public Ceaunefclal Residential Total Aces 5419 34S 76 659.38 1063.03 ° 5 16% 32.81% 62 03% 100% 8 mp 4-N■ _ TMO6 A5 Oli OR - RATI LESUAKE h W A3CIY RDI 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 0.9 AMENDED.JANUARY 25.2OOi • — bites (ORD.NO.MOT-S) 114 I .4PF+,1 6s7..y4.i TR-4 South U.S 41 Transportation V. , iatt �r,.ra wyR GVC�:sr^s ..et ta-.r._:T;i'iE.:EA cam. ui5.9?+. `t a Concurrency Exception Area(TCEA) Circulation The East Trail is a significant arterial roadway that serves the East Naples community. The predominant mode of travel is by automobile, although the East Trail corridor has opportunities for alternative modes as well. The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) labels the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and north into the City of Naples as a "Congested Corridor." The Collier County Growth Management Plan delineates the U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) at the northwest portion of the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and north to Davis Boulevard. This designation is established pursuant to Florida law in recognition of communities who adopt strategies for Urban Infill and Urban • Redevelopment. This area of the East Trail is granted exceptions from traffic concurrency because a variety of uses are in close proximity, and provisions for alternatives to auto-only circulation are available. Such alternatives include: bike racks, bus stops, mixed use development, and sidewalks, which are considered appropriate solutions to congested conditions. Alternative modes exist and are planned for expansion along the corridor. The Collier Area Transit service has bus routes from the northwestern extent of the Study Area to Greenway Road, and a future transit route is proposed to extend south to C.R. 92. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 6 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Sidewalks are primarily located within the East Trail right-of-way from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to Naples Manor subdivision. Pathways are proposed to extend from C.R. 951 south in the future. Bike lanes are primarily located within the corridor from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to the Rattlesnake Hammock intersection. Bike lanes are proposed extending south from C.R. 951 in the future. Population Characteristics Collier County's Comprehensive Planning Department delineates planning communities and generates population figures for each area. The planning communities that relate to the East Trail corridor are the East Naples, South Naples and Royal Fakapalm planning communities. The County's statistics project population growth from 68,724 people in 2008 to 98,876 people in 2020, constituting an increase of 30,152 residents (an increase of 44%). The figures show small growth of population in East Naples (northeastern portion of the corridor), an increase of 51% in South Naples (central portion of the corridor) and growth that nearly doubles the population in the outlying Royal Fakapalm area. POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY PLANNING COMMUNITY COLLIER COUNTY.FLORIDA COLDER COUNTY 2008 2015 2020 2008-2415 2008-2015 PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION NUMERIC CHANGE %CHANGE .. 8 � r. 5 ` 73 07441,. .„ vote,.4.4,:AQ :rt14.1fp! ;10,-tAtti,i; _wiot.(141.11:01,16, .c., ` • any + � Yt x . . p ,� ,.. k 7 spit `.:4(1 r £6 fj$¢m +. d t _ .{ i1 YS - � j l;'fffY a`i .•' J'i from Economic Development Council of Collier County's"Market Facts 2008-2009" Source:Co;Iier County Corrprehene;e Penn ng Department Revised NOS The 2000 Census data for Census Tracts adjacent to the East Trail corridor indicates a median household income of$39,405 for this area, which slightly exceeded the State of Florida's median household income of$38,819. Neighborhood and Housing Conditions The East Trail is a community of many neighborhoods. Older established neighborhoods are located at the northwestern portion of the corridor, proximate to many community facilities. From Rattlesnake Hammock Road and south, existing and planned large golf course communities are the predominant neighborhood type, with the exception of some established single family subdivisions including Naples Manor. Housing characteristics range from older single family structures in established neighborhoods, to newer single and multifamily structures in the gated and golf course communities. A cross section of the community is served, from entry level housing to luxury estates. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 7 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor South of C.R. 951, single family developments have been approved and developed along side established larger tract subdivisions that accommodate rural single family homes and some mobile homes. Fiddlers Creek is a large community permitted for residential development along an extensive section of this part of the corridor. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village. Economic Conditions and Trends After years of dramatic economic growth through the last decade, economic conditions have deteriorated for the country, the state, and particularly southwest Florida. Housing and construction were primary economic drivers for this area throughout the past decade, and the housing market has been in sharp decline since reaching its peak in 2005. Development projects that were approved in recent years are facing financial difficulty as homebuying lags behind market supply. With the drop in homebuying and consumer spending, the commercial development supporting residential areas along the East Trail has also suffered decline. Businesses have closed and some new commercial developments remain unoccupied. Economists indicate the outlook is a slow, steady recovery over the next several years. With the development of a new hospital on County Road 951 near Rattlesnake Hammock Road, along with the County Government Center that will endure as a major workplace, the East Trail corridor is an area that can continue to attract new residents and support new business if properly planned. Environmental Characteristics Beyond the most urban portions of the corridor, areas surrounding the East Trail are rich in environmental quality. Sugden Park and Eagle Lakes Park provide a glimpse of the natural features for the residents to enjoy in the more developed areas of the corridor. The Collier-Seminole State Park at the southeastern terminus of the corridor is a large protected natural area. South and east of the Study area are Panther Zones designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Collier County's environmental policies and standards have governed the development of subdivisions built over the past 10-15 years so that significant native vegetation is preserved and maintained in perpetuity. Such environmental regulations shall continue to be observed and followed as the corridor develops, with a focus on avoiding impacts to wetlands and critical habitat for protected species. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 8 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Past Planning efforts The Community Character Plan for Collier County ("Character Plan") was completed in 2001. The Character Plan set forth goals and implementation steps to redefine centers of activity and quality neighborhoods throughout the County. The Character Plan identified the need to focus on building human scale settings rather than auto-oriented, single use developments. The Plan illustrated photos that were ranked as the least appealing images of Collier County according to a public image survey. As shown below, all three of the lowest ranking photos were taken in East Naples. The Character Plan also included a conceptual design study of the Naples Town Center shopping center, showing how infill development could revitalize the declining strip mall as a mixed use center of activity. The Character Plan put forth valuable planning strategies and implementation steps to promote quality design of the built environment in Collier County. Only a few of the recommendations have resulted in new policies or techniques applied in the processing of development projects. E4" �. X q ;.N fit. ",p.3 i i.« r '� tr*AV Isle of Capri Road Tamiami Trail East Naples Town Center The three lowest rated images from the Community Character Plan for Collier County Johnson Engineering, Inc. 9 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor gad gage Tittioninci gaoceaa Per Florida Statutes Section 163.3177 (13), local governments are encouraged to develop a community vision that provides for sustainable growth, recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural resources. The stakeholders along the East Trail corridor realize that their future must be planned according to a vision that directs growth in an orderly manner in appropriate locations. This visioning process for the East Trail incorporates public involvement and applicable planning principles to arrive at a vision concept plan and a vision statement with supporting goals and strategies to direct future development along the corridor. Public Involvement A Public Input Meeting was held on March _ 30, 2009 to survey the priority issues of , '_�.........-` A�`1 _ property owners and residents along the r --�� East Trail corridor. Property owners ` ' 4 kk r 1 adjacent to the East Trail and neighborhood . # ;'.. �' ill-.I i , i associations adjacent to the Study Area were t-.. 1 notified of the meeting by mail, and it was ., ,i -- advertised in the Collier Citizen newspaper. -. An Image Preference Survey was conducted with approximately 40 meeting attendees. i'*.? The Image Preference Survey consisted of . 40 pictures taken both along the East Trail ' , and in other areas of Collier and. Lee ' T_ Counties. Pictures ranged from rural scenic r^ Y * ++r ... views to urban hardscapes. The results of 'i` , • i * i . ► ! i the Image Preference Survey revealed that A _ Mk:., i the most favored images were well - z, landscaped semi urban and suburban scenes, . 22 2 as illustrated to the right and below. --- —= :5 -t;---,> ` :^"` '.....it... it, . , I . I i T f r: ■ - y r-. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 10 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor The images that were ranked as least favorable during the Image Survey are depicted below. These images portray auto-oriented uses along roadways that are characteristic of sprawl-like development. 4 ... , !{ 1' .wn ''s.., a..` __, , . II ac _ Vall - 7, ' w ti tiara eilimummi SW { Meeting attendees also answered individual questionnaires about their likes, dislikes and vision for the East Trail's future. The issues most commented on by meeting attendees concerned: 1. Development types (preferences for types of businesses and communities) 2. Aesthetic issues (appearance of roadsides and buildings) 3. Traffic (safety and convenience for cars and pedestrians) Other comments received related to recreation, natural resources, community services, and public safety. For the final phase of the Public Input Meeting, attendees divided into workgroups of four to eight participants. The workgroups focused on one of the four segments of the corridor. The participants identified positives, negatives, and future goals for each segment. The results of this exercise revealed that top priorities for all groups were related to development types and aesthetics. Less noted were the other issues of connectivity,natural resources,recreation and public safety. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 11 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Applicable Planning Principles Using the available data and priorities from the perspective of stakeholders along the corridor, it is evident that a continuation of the past development patterns for twenty more years into the future will not bring about desirable results. Today's struggling commercial strip centers, disconnected neighborhoods, and automobile oriented buildings and uses are not the tools for successful community development in the future. The spread of suburban development sprawling into rural areas is a pattern the Florida Legislature has identified as a problem for communities throughout the state. As a result, Florida Statutes are designed to control growth management policy or land use changes that result in low density, single use development in the countryside that constitutes sprawl. The Transect The existing characteristics, development patterns and context of the East Trail correspond to a planning model known as the Rural-Urban Transect. A transect, in its origins (Von Humboldt 1790), is a geographical cross- section of a region used to reveal a sequence of environments. Originally, it was used to analyze natural ecologies, showing varying characteristics through different zones such as shores, wetlands, plains, and uplands. For human environments, such a cross-section can be used to identify a set of habitats that vary by their level and intensity of urban character, a continuum that ranges from rural to urban. In Transect planning, this range of environments is the basis for organizing the components of urbanism: building, lot, land use, street, and all of the other physical elements of the human habitat. -Andres Duany,et al.,Smelt-Wade&Manual (Miami: New Urban Publications,Inc.2005). The Rural-Urban Transect is a tool that helps us understand and govern the development of communities. The Rural-Urban Transect defines the segments of a community from its most intense"urban core" where the highest density and building heights exist, to the moderately dense "urban center," the less dense "general urban" transect, the more spacious "suburban" transect, the wooded and agricultural "rural" transect, and the "natural" transect consisting of unaltered Iandscape. In The Lexicon of the New Urbanism published by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company, land use, building types, and design standards are applied to each transect to establish human scale and sustainable development patterns appropriate for the context of each area. The East Trail currently incorporates a full range of urban to rural characteristics starting at the County Government Complex at the Airport Road intersection, extending to Collier-Seminole State Park at the County Road 92 intersection. Using the Rural-Urban Transect typology as a guide to manage future growth along the corridor, the design of a vision for the future of the East Trail takes shape. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 12 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor In order to fulfill the orderly development pattern of the Rural-Urban Transect model, the areas along the East Trail Corridor must be designated with appropriate Transects of Urban Center, General Urban, Suburban, Rural and Natural. Urban Core is not recommended for the East Trail corridor, because Urban Core would be typical of a city center which does not correspond to any portion of the East Trail. Centers Along with the Transect designations and related development standards that would be applied to accomplish appropriate scale and style of development relative to location along the corridor, a system of centers or nodes can be designated as concentrations of activity. The Growth Management Plan already applies the principle of centers in the form of Activity Centers located at major road intersections. The Community Character Plan for Collier County sought to advance the concept of centers to be more than commercial nodes. The Character Plan suggests convenient centers should offer the following: quality experiences; diversity of uses, including retail, workplaces, housing, and community facilities; and building types that are durable and flexible to be functional as markets change. The centers should be scaled consistent with the Transect model, so that intensity and design of the center relates to the intensity and design of the surrounding area. Centers put forth in the Character Plan that would be appropriate along the East Trail corridor range in type and scale from town centers, neighborhood centers, village centers,hamlets, and rural crossroads. Mobility The third planning principle that relates to the corridor characteristics and public priorities is mobility planning. The concept of mobility has eclipsed traditional transportation planning models that focused on the automobile as the only measure of successful connection between two points. A mandate for new transportation planning methods in Florida became law in 2008 (Laws of Florida Chapter 2008-191 / House Bill 697). Florida's local governments are now required to adopt policies that discourage urban sprawl, establish energy efficient land use patterns, and develop transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. In the Quality/Level of Service Handbook the Florida Department of Transportation has created level of services measures so that transit services, bicycling, and walking may be counted in addition to the traditional measure of road capacity to serve community mobility needs. This emphasis on developing in ways that reduce vehicle miles traveled results in planning for nodes that allow mobility alternatives. Rather than putting more automobile trips on the road, it is important to allow opportunities for walking, biking and riding the bus to access community facilities, workplaces, and shopping. Quarter-mile and half- mile pedestrian sheds, pedestrian connectivity, and bus transit are important concepts to guide future development and redevelopment of property along the East Trail corridor. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 13 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor 51., &ate avail aOieian. talent-2,a To protect and enhance the quality of life for East Naples residents and business owners, property along the East Trail shall be developed and redeveloped according to orderly and enduring development patterns that concentrate community facilities and services in locations that maximize residents' convenient access so that all needs can be met within their own community, while protecting the scenic quality and natural resources of East Naples. The following goals and strategies are the result of community input and priorities for how the East Trail should development in the future. Goal 1. Establish a framework for orderly future development and redevelopment that emulates the Rural-Urban Transect development pattern. Strategies: o Create a Vision Concept Plan as a graphic tool to show the desired development patterns along the East Trail corridor. o Establish land use and development standards that observe the range of Urban to Rural characteristics along the East Trail and promote building and site designs that provide quality environments. o The Urban Center at the northeastern portion of the corridor should be a concentration of shops, various residential unit types, offices, workplace, civic buildings, and public space in the foiru of plazas and parks. o General Urban areas in Segment 1 and Segment 2 should be primarily low to medium density residential in nature but should provide opportunities for mixed use developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping and public parks, squares and greens. o The Suburban area in Segment 3 should primarily accommodate detached single family home communities that appear landscaped and green when viewed from the road ("viewshed developments"). Parks and greenways are also appropriate. o The Rural area in Segment 4 should primarily accommodate agriculture and scattered buildings, in addition to viewshed developments and a self- sustaining planned rural village. o The Natural area is Collier Seminole State Park at the southeastern terminus of the corridor, which is to remain in its natural unaltered state with the exception of commercially designated land appropriate for a corner store at the intersection of C.R. 92. Goal 2. Establish centers that correspond to the Rural-Urban continuum to define locations where the following components of a community converge: residential, commercial, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, and community facilities. Strategies: o Establish land use and development standards that encourage concentration and mix of uses at centers with varying intensity based on location and accessibility. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 14 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor o Town Centers are designated at the following locations: • The Collier County Government Complex Town Center is a location where all the components of community converge. The complex is a bus transfer station and a major work center, with connectivity to residential neighborhoods within a half mile radius. The aging shopping centers of Walmart and Naples Town Center are opportunities for redevelopment with more intense mixed use settings to incorporate new restaurants and shops within the half mile pedestrian shed. • The Rattlesnake Hammock Road Town Center is a location where residential, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths and community facilities converge within the half-mile pedestrian shed. The future development of Sabal Bay could result in a new school and more commercial uses, including addition of a significant workplace. The aging shopping center at the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock and the East Trail is an opportunity for redevelopment with a more intense mix of uses. • The Navajo Trail Town Center is a location where residential, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, schools, and a park exist, and mixed use development is proposed on existing undeveloped and underutilized sites. o Neighborhood Centers are designated at the following locations: • The Sugden Park Neighborhood Center is a location where the park, residential neighborhoods, commercial uses, bus route, and some pedestrian facilities converge to conveniently serve the Lakewood and Avalon area residents. Due to the short lot depth of existing commercial properties along the corridor, low scale mixed use and the introduction of live-work units is proposed for the eventual redevelopment of the existing commercial properties. • The Saint Andrews Boulevard Neighborhood Center is a location where a commercial center, residential areas, pedestrian facilities, the bus route, and the library converge to serve Lely residents and future residents of Treviso Bay. Mixed use redevelopment and infill development of the existing commercial center is proposed to fortify this location as a viable center of neighborhood scale services within walking and biking distance for the adjacent neighborhoods. • The 951 Neighborhood Center is a location where commercial centers, residential communities, and the bus route converge. This location did not achieve status as a Town Center due to its location in the Suburban Transect and the limited number of community service components that are viable for this location. Eventual redevelopment of the shopping centers is envisioned as low scale, walkable, mixed use development that creates an identity for the 951 intersection that relates to the large adjacent neighborhoods of Johnson Engineering,Inc. 15 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, and the other smaller residential neighborhoods in close proximity. o Village Centers are designated in the following locations: • The 6Ls Village Center is designated where the 6Ls Farm currently exists. The Collier County Future Land Use Map designates this large property as a receiving area eligible for development as a rural village. Therefore, a Village Center is appropriate in this location. The Village Center should serve the future rural village as well as nearby residents with minimal commercial uses and services needed for convenience. o Hamlets are designated in the following locations: • The Manatee School Hamlet is a location where community facilities are concentrated at the transition between the Suburban and Rural transects. This hamlet is characterized by the existing community facilities of the schools and the church. The location could be further developed as a focal point for community based activities, along with commercial uses to serve nearby residents. o Rural Crossroads are designated at the following location: • The C.R. 92 Rural Crossroads is designated for small scale commercial uses such as a corner store due to its location in the natural area of the Collier Seminole State Park. Goal 3. Establish mobility strategies that facilitate pedestrian, bicycle, and bus transit connections between established neighborhoods, new development and redevelopment. Strategies: o Limit vehicle miles traveled by concentrating development where bus, pedestrian,and bicycle infrastructure exists or is planned. o Allow mixed use development and live-work units along with reductions in parking requirements as a mechanism to reduce vehicle miles traveled. o Require connections between new and existing development, including residential uses, commercial uses,and community facilities. o Incorporate new bus facilities in new developments. o Promote complete street design for road improvement projects, so that landscape treatments promoting pedestrian comfort, as well as pathways, bikeways and bus services, are critical components of the road design. Goal 4. Promote economic development by planning for an appropriate mix of uses and housing types to support viable new commercial, retail, restaurant, hotel, and other services. Strategies: o Analyze market characteristics and trends to identify opportunities and limitations that affect development and location of desired uses along the corridor. o Coordinate with the Economic Development Council to develop a strategy to attract new desired businesses. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 16 April 2010 Vision for the East Trail Corridor o Promote land use regulations that limit incompatible land uses and are responsive to newer trends in building and design to accommodate innovative development types. o Identify a "brand" for the East Trail corridor, and use it to promote the East Trail through marketing initiatives to attract new residents, new businesses and eco-tourism. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 17 April 2010 SEGMENT I I •. ^, 41. SEGMENT --4 — 51-505.1k5S05.U Tfl 'U 45 56' • • = ( I ere d^^^ roc, * - ; Cr4i, um...hi R1.114104,, ItUt.i WANATEF.Aio J5.1.".7 (490 • LEGEND p.r..5 C rft,t1i; VitYrNhED DUOEN Al-TM! Fr SIDENTIM Isl L moil LIVE e WORN, (1 v 1C, lbws. 111111mmtt) KISTINt.s voLA "ItA t 1.;41FENNVA 111111INSTITUTION rIk•IC ''' •...IVOSEL) t NAL* • , IRA IC CAREVAA'.45N k(010.1RIV.1 •••••• F N I LINE!. •• • •t,N•tith LONE • •rq;mApr AM)SICCP,OARt zomS ARE FXAFAF 4"N(s 154+NDATO: -1 On-qtP)l'ANT PICA 2C.Idf 5 ART Ihr.40,tt,',0.1”.i 01,4 C (.2...," ...•■••■ ani— %IF 1-"cc wZ .---i i-7 --, IENT III I,0,, 'I', ''.:4.■.,....'-':. ''''':".FriTi.-IC=TLICKWCAgTS .... ..... ... ..., ..„... .... 11;f11,.,,,,.... in'', :::. 11221181111 ;1111;4_ 7-1 , I •.:-...;: . . - ":...":-.: c_-_-._.• 0 .... .., .----, - -N Q.., ,-•iii. X,.... .• ••::.- CRIVALPAtt•GO:f Cs;IF:-—----•• :' 74 ... , 1-- 74Ti ...)1,). C'.. ....k cc.1...i.o.k.t,i ■94,,/ . .. .,. N--",.. .. 'II Q -E` ... ".......„„ co — .--- - >, 51+N)40c.0 r‘rx-.l' Ilk, �. ` /fit?�l fJh/.k.- J � /0- . . POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY PLANNING COMMUNITY COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA -COLUER COUNTY 2008 2015 2020 2008-2015 2008-2015 PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION NUMERIC CHANGE °A CHANGE Coritsorew 3,106 9,227 13,815 6,121 197.07% Sig Cypress 205 213 219 8 3.90% Central Naples 20,496 20,956 21,300 460 2.24% East Naples 25,801 26,229 26,549 428 1.66% ,.. Golden Gate 45,101 46,295 47,189 1,194 2.65% irnmolialee 25,946 38,461 47,844 12,515 4823% Marco Island 1,494 1,599 1,677 105 7.03% ... North Naples 58,601 61,810 64,217 3,209 5.48% Royal Fakapalm 15,533. 24,314 30,898 8,781 56.53% Rural Estates 37,270 46,616 53,623 9,346 25.08% South Naples 27,390 35,414 41,429 8,024 29.30% ,Urban Estates 39,125 51,511 60,797 12,386 31.66% *, COLUER COUNTY 2008 2015 2020 2008-2015 2008-2015 PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION NUMERIC CHANGE %CHANGE City of Naples 23,704 25,635 26,700 1,931 8.15% City of Marcx)Island 15,988 17,338 18,332 1,350 8.44% Everglades City 648 683 709 35 5.40% Source:Collier Calmly Comprehensive Planning Department,Rued 6/08 PLANNING COMMUNITIES .., _ <._ . COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA .,.. - -- . -::. : 1'North Naples 7-Royal Fakapalm _ i ' •-- ' 2-Central Naples 9-Rural Estates 3-Golden Gate 9-Corkscrew 4-East Naples 10-Immokalee ._...„ 5-South Naples 11-fing Cypress 'Marco Island 12-Urban Estates i I it - . . V . ._ i t,* , .. L‘,*-_ _.1. J -14LF,I vs: N !.. .„,:v „_-,._„._,, ,., L ,_-- ,--...,-; .1...3R-. 1 „,.._1,.. 41:1, -.77----- , .. . ....... 6 Economic DeNelopment Council of Collier C'ountl, ViNN N%eNaplesflorida.com PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE EAST TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY der Monday, MARCH 30, 2009 41 Nap&e& 5outulai ittu, About this Study Objective of this Study The East Naples Foundation, Inc., the The objective of this study is to anticipate, philanthropic arm of the East Naples Civic plan, and identify adjustments to regulatory Association (ENCA), is seeking community framework so that the East Trail corridor involvement to fund and complete a corridor study grows viably while protecting quality of life. of Tamiami Trail East (the "East Trail") from its This study will ultimately result in a plan that Airport Pulling Road intersection south to its documents the current conditions of the East County Road 92 intersection. The study is expected Trail, identifies the vision for the future of the to define an identity for the East Trail corridor. corridor based on community input, and The ultimate result of the study is a Corridor Plan outlines the goals, objectives and policies that that indicates existing qualities to be protected, will guide future development. target areas for development and redevelopment, and an overall vision for the future. Public Involvement The public involvement component of this study is important. Property owners along the corridor, nearby residents and business owners, and other stakeholders in the area, will have opportunities to participate in the study process. Through newsletters and two public meetings, the East Naples Foundation seeks to include and inform the community during the process. The first public workshop is scheduled for March 30, 2009 and the second will be determined based on availability of funds to continue the study effort. To support or get more information about the effort, please contact enaplesfnd(a?aol.com &et.Napeco .`taturdat:ort,3nc. 4915 fRatifeenuffe Mammoth gcl..#214 Arap(eo,tf.34113 EASTTRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY FIRST PUBLIC WORKSHOP MARCH 30 2009 St30 pm to I:00 pm AT St PeterThe Apostle Catholic Church 5 130 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Naples, FL 341 t3 bad 0[0.1146, VGwiaa{Qcn, At.c. East Trail Master Plan Study _ SEGMENT WORKGROUP RESULTS SEGMENT 1 l SEGMENT 2 SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT 4 AESTHETICS Landscaping and Open Space • Architectural Design • • Rural Character • Cleanliness • CONNECTIVITY Existing Pathway I 1 I • (0 SERVICES 0 Quick Response Time • Ce O. Proximity to Paints of Interest • • DEVELOPMENT Quantity of Commercial Space • New Homes • New Development • Density • OTHER Natural Resources 1 • AESTHETICS Seas of Parking • Uns&ahity Utilities • Unsightly Buildings • — Guardrails Homeless 8 Day Laborers • Litter I • CONNECTIVITY Limited Connection between Destinations • CO Dangerous Roadways(Turnlanes/Access) • • Z • Q Segmented Sidewalks U DEVELOPMENT Unsightly Development(Pawn,Tattoo) • • Redevelopment Obstacles • Limited Commercial Lot Depth • Stop Malls • • — Vacant Business • • Low Income Housing • _ • High Impact Fees • OTHER Perceived Crime&Safety • • I I AESTHETICS Increased Landscape • I Increased Open Space • Increased Buffer • • — Design Review/Review Committee • Update Unsightly Building Facades • — Control Light Pollution • CONNECTIVITY Improve/Provide Bike'Pedestrian • • • • .Connections _ RECREATION. Increased Parks&Open Space • I • _ co SERVICES Increased Access to Civic Uses • 1 • - I 0 DEVELOPMENT Increased Density • • 1 Increased Retail(up scale) • • — lncreased Hotels • • _. _ Increased BaGque Shops • Increased Restsrants • Lot Assembly for Larger Retail • - Business Park • • OTHER Environmental Sensitivity • Ecstourism • • Meeting PiacesaConvention • Center/Amphitheater Johnson Engineering,Inc. H-120080000it20087796-000-East Naples Foundation Inc.(Tamiami Trail E.Strategic Pianning):PUBLIC INPUT MEETING DOCUMENTSIEast Naples Trail_Survey Analysfs.xls ca.a.i aaffea Uati aa-fion., Ate. East Trail Master Plan Study Public Input Meeting 3/30/09 _ Individual Questionnaire Responses What do you think the East Trail What do you like along the Trail should develop t change over the What is your biggest concern and want to keep the same? next 20 years? about the East Trail? I AEeTtiencs-17 I I AESTHETICS-14 I I AESTREr1CS-3 I 12 Landsapzy/Parka/Natural Arens 13 Appearance 3 Perception and Appearance 2 Entry Serape Update cid Baseless Front- Loss of Character 2 Lightrr 3 Clean-:,p lack of Maintenance and Re-r-avrrnrei.t I Old F arida Character Bus Sfa.0 I AQ WEcryrrr.5 1 A rchdecturatCordmuilvtTransii on2one Between Segments I CORt CTnrsry-4 I 3 SUewelk'Cr:a Lane/Uutrrrrno Tra, Landscaping 2 Traffic Safety t Conned:.?;to the Lrrrary Establish a Down Review Commetee 21-S��afel;for Bi:rcirsl and Pe,:estrsns _ I Traffic All Wales Underground 1 RECREATION-0 —I 1 RECREATION•1 = 1 lighting Ordinance t Golf Crysy I .: :_CONNECTIVITY-7 I I SERVICES•1 I 4 Improve Traffte Patterns I Lost Services T'— SERVCES•4 I Improve 251 041 htersedi,n9 t OEVELOPNENT-14 3 Library Traffic Lights d Blight and Vacant Store Fronts 1 Scnvc!s Reduce Feeling of Traffic Catge inn 3 Low Nn:zme Housing I- 2 lame Sidewalk CormecdHtyf Recreation l Mai-use bails 2 Balanced Growth I Unconbolled Growth 6 . - OEVEIARASENT-13 I I Functional Infrastructure 1 Abaniance of Storage tints 7 E.icin .�n.I.s es I RECREATION-1 I t Development of Strip Malls Beaks Environmental Enhancements 1 fdabi/e Homes Eurasia Restaurant I 1. —1 2 •, SERVICES OTHER-2 French Bakery 2 Ares:Cotter I Levan• 2 Crime McConnell's Hardware I ANT-31 .. I Hess 22 Business Development Moats Theater Marketing as a Decimation 6 ReseteMOi peve meem More Restaurants Lely Resort Encourage Upscale Development Treviso Bay Restaurants(hear and chains) I OTHER,2 Locher I Oatdoor Direct -' I Retail I Populationdiversi:r Hotel 1 low Pop ulat.-.n Prat'Wit Pawn and Adult Entertainment ent Stores Meet-use Development Commercial Nodes(rather than stria malls 6 storage units) 3 Reduction of Strip Malls 3 Lima Low neeme Housing 1 Parking in the Rear of Developments 1 Accommodate thee!Village Development .-- I Land Residential Urds Besominr Retail I -_ arealt`+ I 2 Longer Operatrot Hours far Business I Crime Control/Prevention I Continue the Conch:Plan Priority by Pertenlape DEVELOPMENT ;; CORRIDOR PRIORITIES 4 Responses from Individual Questionnaires 38 46% AESTHETICS •SERVICES •RECREATION 17 2% a 6% 3 0 OTHER 31 27'&. 744 O CONNECTIVITY 6 7 a °CONNECTIVITY i s __ . 4E .. 16 13% 1 DEVELOPMENT 13:e i is AESTHETICS OTHER a DEVELOPMtNl 2 .16% ❑CONNECTIVITY a 2 i °OTHER a 65i - /I •SERVICES i SERVICES °RECREATION a 2 7 6% RECREATION 1 2 0 3 2% — Johnson Engineering,Inc. 19120560002120097766-000-East Naples Foundation Ina(Tam ia ei Tray E.Strategic Piannirg)IPUBLIC 7.PLtT MEETING DOCUMEHTS1East Naples Trat_Survey Analysis cis EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting • St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church Sign In Sheet NAM. ADDRESS EMAIL 1‘_I, i ' 1.4 I r t 5,f ( q-. 0113r alq-e,{S • • UN: 'tio 1 - fla 2 1 ' 'l rkt 133s. C l ,e. (4.,,c-.1 W,,P \ (ar•n:^S fY,-,0_, {,t,todSL (,)a;e".. 0e.vtL - 3 I\PP2--)-7,4--1114.24- iii/L 3 /ditL&J-",-4,--/ 7)6-/ ` l , / 4 Jt iJT LD , 3ea1,,` , f,S • 5 • Qi- Cr.-At 4 Li#t 7/ /0 i/I'IiL-r4.46-4"1 .dti - i'7-�t f,e -7eaS /"chzo .6A,ti. . tll/lf l2 -7/7 (3f1-y /}1c"7tro�.u5 ()2 L.Ez1/G/Vfc./�SSA/ a Atoz-. Cc 6�Eti-Irt!!t'=L—;2 r 7 jjs,`1 , r 7 4 I 1 8 . -...m ...Ili ,_f i 6F" 7_ r M )1.7, ( 3 3 / tl'Z.-<rn%, ✓ 10 �v b tt 4, 4 1-554.1r1.&- 6.---V-e-Q.-9---C. -c-1,.. .S �i (-..ct,t. dii.,:_cf[. L 3,o , S, ret Z c7 w.. S CIA �ti�. 11 , 53,c cL.L.4.60 5�c_ 1100 t s LN1 `{C2�`/ tSk-r CIAO e Iffle,epsibjp1,1 qw 5c(dno Pkwy 12 Ka' `t reK ? liar 7O/ it/. / A-T !vS R. -3(-1/1 yen. l ;rna1 t7 //-1-106 . 1 //wit ,317 ,ii ,7z 4477,, .347 4 2-- ?z s� . c Q .4 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting NAME ADDRESS EMAIL f�, ,4��/`VrCci lv, Lf�. 3 y�,�fr 15 //' L /7:6 c'i1 refi, 3 3 01 Q c'i}.;4441'i r� 16C/74 g L f5 CC9/21-72r rob G-&,1;. /3:42- -L,1;. /3:'s- 6t-v s/YZCl t3 ELI 0L.,CO Ai 17 J v�, % • c>2 o CS?u t .c., Q,L,3t t Z -- ,,tv AL 4' -5 77 C/J-2L hd k?3L1 Z t €zda vck. 19 �/� 0 r S S - (-Ow 20 _ 1 / -eve. co__ o 'j j Al i 42-/6 -4/ 3W/.? djz" O� , 44c e r "1L�1 f CCfY") 21 n Go\dev, x&(24 C 4 R, t Q}�O�c S�C�v�C�• �e 22 4(ele, U 3-66" 744- ( ,-rC / LlsmGEorzcr- 23 L.,c�,Y- 1 It,i1 �~ �-�- l�1 Q1 to V-On b _ t �s 'it lam( 24 ,( , / etc- ie-72 F 7 ( Gtf. Lcrzu 1.G ' 25 26 27 28 29 Page 2 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting • St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church Sign In Sheet NAME ADDRESS EMAIL v1vCa --C `€- o o,JG (Cc c7- CcuaPc4a floc—r- vl._ 2 tC A�1 � T v ,i �j c r - 3 S 3 )14.te-€. P ht4r. 41 .CuL.- . t‘-' C-P —5. 4 Ski IQ /Cc q6/12(them 6126, 5 - 41. �.::lG''�1 5-,3 75—//1 /SG 4'S ()fe ticJi. .1£, 70e9tA.CdA//S.Scd.t�S6'/� Cvftt 6 A _ I • r IA LI S O �c��e k 1 C i li l le A/Cr)46i AI Fs,?@)517, r )h r�, e ct ('� `� ti 7 ` - c` `,es 133,7 8 Al r r-e-n -aOrne 7-39Ora)cel 3Yrzp bornesSt (r4CIr11le' 9 l 64) �(5L �f� z_/7�`� ( ►) FSs e4-u, .lDa ! ef-t 'Ck2cr�(nc�� LAc�srco, of d r ,g/c7s51,4(i � -a� t,,f7vo 1 i 'l ireAr-mtv,q3. .4,16//) 11 12 13 { _1 Rental Apartment Survey Collier County, Florida March 11, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014 Prepared for Mr. Christopher Shucart Global Properties of Naples. Prepared by Michael J. Timmerman, CRE, FRICS, SRA ResortProperties.com, Inc. 1415 Panther Lane Suites 367 Naples, Florida 34109 239-269-0769 ATTACHMENT "D" TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 CONDITIONS OF THE REPORT 3 1.1 INTENDED USE OF THIS REPORT 3 1.2 INTENDED USER OF THIS REPORT 3 2.0 SCOPE OF STUDY 3 2.1 TASK PLAN 3 3.0 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA OVERVIEW AND FORECAST 4 4.0 DEMOGRAPHIC AND MARKET PROFILE 5 4.1 OVERVIEW OF FLORIDA 5 4.2 OVERVIEW OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA 5 5.0 COLLIER COUNTY RENTAL APARTMENT MARKET 6 5.1 MARKET RATE APARTMENTS 16 6.0 MARKET PERFORMANCE SCORE 22 7.0 NEW RENTAL APARTMENT SUMMARY 25 8.0 FEE SIMPLE CONDOMINIUM RENTALS 26 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMANDATIONS 30 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 31 RESTRICTION UPON DISCLOSURE AND USE 33 COPYRIGHT, TRADEMARK AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER 34 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE 35 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 2/36 Introduction As we understand it, GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client")would like ResortProperties.com, Inc. ("Consultant")to study the rental apartment market in Collier County, FL. This study is to research the supply and demand trends and associated pricing of the rental apartments in Collier County, FL. It will conclude with a report summarizing the market conditions. 1.0 Conditions of the Report The Client is responsible for representations about its development plans, marketing expectations and for disclosure of any significant information that might affect the ultimate realization of the projected results. There will usually be differences between projected and actual results because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and the differences may be material. 1.1 Intended Use of This Report The intended use of the analysis is to provide GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client")with a current understanding of the supply and demand ratio and associated pricing of the rental apartment market in Collier County. 1.2 Intended User of This Report The intended user of this analysis is GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client") only. No other users are authorized to use the report for any other purpose. 2.0 Scope of Study Based on our understanding of the current situation, the Consultant has developed a scope of work to analyze the Project as identified above. The scope is based on the Client's objectives, as described to the Consultant, which includes the following interrelated tasks. 2.1 Task Plan We will perform the following scope of professional services in order to meet the objectives of this assignment: Phase 1 Task 1 —Research and profile all the rental apartment complexes in Collier County and provide a conclusion of the supply and demand trends and associated pricing for the county as a whole. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 3/36 3.0 Southwest Florida Overview and Forecast As of the July 2012,census estimate,there are an estimated 1.14 million people living year-round in Southwest Florida. Since the 2000 Census, the area's population has increased by 38%, the equivalent of 305,000 new residents. Looking ahead, Southwest Florida will continue to gain new residents at a faster rate on a percentage basis than the state of Florida. By the year 2015, the population of Southwest Florida is projected to total 1.21 million residents. This is an annual growth rate of 1.06% from 2012 to 2015 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 0.83% during the same time period. The Consultant analyzed the major economic growth trends driving Collier County and generated a forecast for those indicators through 2015. The population of Collier County grew slightly between 2009 and 2010, then increased in 2012 and is expected to reach the peak population of 353,896 by 2015. The analysis is derived from the Consultant's annual economic forecast model, which provides population, household, employment and construction forecasts at the county level. The 2015 forecasted population represents a 6.4% increase over the 2012 population. Accompanying this population growth was a short term employment decline from 2009 and 2010; with growth occurring in 2011 and 2012.We expect increases in employment as the real estate market expands and as the baby boomers increase their purchases of second homes. The corporate relocation of Hertz Global in Estero will also help to spur employment growth in Collier. The majority of the decline in employment was in the construction industry and related support services such as mortgage and real estate services. The recent increases in employment have been in education, health care and retail trade, with the real estate related industries increasing steadily. Housing Market The housing market grew at an unsustainable pace from 2002 to 2006 creating an excess supply of housing units in relation to households formed in several areas of Collier County. The areas which saw the majority of this growth were generally more affordable areas of Naples Park, Golden Gate City and Golden Gate Estates. The abundance of easy money moved the market incentive for homes from one of personal preference to one of speculation. This speculative market inflated pricing beyond the historical property appreciation trends providing the market with false expectations of future home value stability. Home pricing began to fall in late 2006 and did not begin to stabilize until the third quarter of 2009. Since the beginning of 2011, home prices have risen and have reached a growth rate of more than 15% per year over the past 2 years. This growth rate is not sustainable and is anticipated to level off as the inventory increases. There is currently pent up demand for new homes, however many existing homeowners who move up or down will explore new construction if the cost is commensurate with purchasing an existing home of similar utility. The new supply of housing will help alleviate the current shortage of product and provide a balance in the supply demand ratio. This limited supply of housing was also noted in the rental apartment market as no new projects were added due to the high cost of land. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 4/36 4.0 Demographic and Market Profile 4.1 Overview of Florida Florida is currently the nation's fourth most populous state, home to an estimated 19.3 million people. The U.S. Census Bureau projections indicate that the top three fastest-growing states between 2010 and 2030 will be Florida (300,000 persons/year), Texas (400,000 persons/year), and California(400,000 persons/year). Florida is expected to have the largest net growth as well as the third highest percent increase(approximately 600 new residents are expected to move to Florida each day starting in 2014). By the year 2030, Florida's population is projected to total 28.7 million people and will edge past New York into third place in total population(California and Texas would continue to rank first and second respectively). Florida's population growth is depicted in the map below. This shows the latest projections of growth by county for the year 2030. As you can see, the most heavily populated counties in Florida are Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties in Southeast Florida; Hillsborough and Pinellas counties in the Tampa metro market; Orange County in Central Florida, and Duval County in the Jacksonville metro area. Table 4.1.1 2030 Population Projections by County % 4 Florida Counties Population Projections 2030 t �. i i 100,000 or less IN 100,001-250,000 -- -250,001-500,000 -500,001-1,000,000 -1,000,001+ i 0 d5 90 180 Niles I I l i l Source:University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 4.2 Overview of Southwest Florida Southwest Florida is defined by the three-county region that consists of Lee,Collier and Charlotte counties. The chart below shows the 2012 population estimate by county along with the 2015 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 5/36 Population estimate. Charlotte County is the smallest of the three counties with 14% of the region's population while Lee County is the most populated with 57% of the total. Table 4.2.1 Southwest Florida Region Annual Growth County 2012 Population %of Regic 2015 Population %of Region Rate Charlotte 162,449 14.2% 169,681 13.9% 1,446 Lee 645,293 56.6% 695,952 57.1% 10,132 Collier 332,427 29.2% 353,896 29.0% 4,294 Total 1,140,169 1,219,529 Source: Bureau of Economic&Business Research, 2012 Population Estimates Currently, there are an estimated 1.14 million people living year-round in Southwest Florida. Since the 2000 Census, the area's population has increased by 38%, the equivalent of 310,000 new residents. Looking ahead, Southwest Florida will continue to gain new residents at a faster rate on a percentage basis than the rest of the State of Florida. By the year 2015, the population of Southwest Florida is projected to total 1.21 million residents. This is an annual growth rate of 1.06 % from 2012 to 2015 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 0.82% during the same time period. Strong population growth in the Southwest Florida market is due to both the in-migration of young professionals looking for a better quality of life as well as the ongoing arrival of baby boomer retirees. The number of baby boomers reaching retirement age is expected to peak in 2020, however the delay in this group's move to other markets has been pushed ahead, therefore the demand is expected to increase. The appeal of the Southwest Florida market indicates a steady demand for housing over the long term. In addition to the growth in permanent residents, the number of visitors to the area is on a continuous rise. Southwest Florida International Airport, located in Lee County, has undergone a $438 million expansion with future capacity to handle ten million passengers annually. In 2012, the annual traffic was 7.3 million passengers which is up from prior years. The expansion of the 1-75 and a dedicated interchange (currently under construction) for RSW has significantly improved the capacity of vehicular transportation infrastructure. The annual economic impact of the Southwest Florida International Airport is estimated at$3.8 Billion annually. Overall, the infrastructure investments made in Southwest Florida over the past 5 years have significantly improved the future capacity for growth. This capacity will allow more residents to enjoy the quality of life currently afforded to the market. It will also positively impact the area's ability to attract new business,which would help to diversify the local economy,further enhancing the region's future growth potential. 5.0 COLLIER COUNTY RENTAL APARTMENT MARKET A review of 41 rental apartments in Collier was conducted to estimate the overall supply. The apartments utilized in this sample are those with 100 or more units and range in age from new to ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 6/36 40 years. The projects are located throughout the county with the newer communities located in southern Collier County due to historically lower land cost and availability of land in the urban area. Located below is a map showing the location of the apartments researched for this study followed by a map key. ,,:hury , cagy �t Map ID ....._..._----_._.:�.i.t' AYdLC�-l.__- . .El. P 4- Benli.i ® .... _- Yiicc)! I.b imiwl 1,01 :r-r-1 Country C,vRCfut. Club The Club id 01.111 j lionlla La P1`.,:. r.kkf L4 lid,l Club At ❑.1 llnr Golf Club r,/fx.S Hula P:y.. T».awsm,({e• rxR riu!" '}� Ray 'Jib I:,Y_-^i^.ttf,E°...4g /m,kain•-Rd © . Colo as A „..,. I:.sY CIO, rec.1.1.3.r.ii T:in-run. `:an3e11n11 Olde liGN Club .,,;If •"cunt y Floc..la Club '.. gi gilub -If Clot.■CI— %43nde1-b11t B•aah Rd"' II” TY v 1 tl {�7 s,a rd. -Golden Gale Blvd w Zj15 f 11.1-4.:': } m Pin.Rkit iJZ • m i — 36 10 — z e' z .-5: I • 3819 a z .. 8 1. a ¢ e,s i - \ G Idn G",'•© tl'11.1, 113 m . - 13 Itunntpsi- Radro: m • '-"'v—. =-- Airlort n ® t. .69 2` • Nep1e 1 is Blvd 84 i i i r m d s` • - 8 n RJllItstiake{I.rm or.1, Imm Lr7a: r urtr, 33?` e q F 1 tu . MI 1 S ,r d •r Roams:Esri Cd orme.NAVTEC.USGS.mlermep.iPC.NRCAH,Esri.leFen. tETI,Esri China;Hong Kong).Esri tThaiena).'7^m,Tem,2713 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 7/36 Map_ID Project Map_ID Project 1 Bear Creek 21 Northgate Club 2 Belvedere 22 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) 3 Berkshire Reserve 23 Ospreys Landing 4 Bermuda Island 24 Meadow Brook Preserve(Turtle Creek) 5 Brittany Bay I&II 25 River Reach 6 Bryn Mawr 26 Saba!Key 7 College Park 27 Saddlebrook Village 8 Coral Palms 28 San Marino(Aventine) 9 Goodlette Arms 29 Shadowood Park 10 Heritage(MerSoleil) 30 Somerset Palms(Arbor View) 11 Heron Park 31 Summer Lakes I 12 Ibis Club 32 Summer Lakes II 13 Jasmine Cay 33 Summer Wind 14 La Costa 34 Tuscan Isle 15 Lagu Bay 35 Villas of Capri 16 Malibu Lakes 36 Waverley Place 17 Meadow Lakes(Saxon Manor) 37 Whistler's Cove 18 Naples 701 38 Whistler's Green 19 Naples Place I-Ill 39 Windsong Club 20 Noah's Landing 40 Aster Lely 41 Sierra Grande The apartments surveyed include both market and subsidized housing and are all included to provide a census of the rental apartment market. Located below is a profile of each apartment complex followed by a map showing the year built of each complex and the most recent market attributes for each. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 8/36 a o n ° n..n " o oa o ° 0m o. o o " o+ mm 6 h �HN NN VNN NNN pN NpD NNNNNNN N t+��NNN NN NpD NNpO NNNNN p�p N NNNN N N N 0) `, W n I 0 1 0 W T W W n n .1 O .". 0 0 m 0 ! o n $ 0 �0 01 o n n 0 0!a N 0 0 0 .. O f1 C O " 0 0 0 0 " " "•'� 0 O O O O O Ci G O O G LL N " m p o 0 m n o 0 1p n.. m o m 0 o b n m n o m m n 0 m tl Q, 0 0 0 .. :. O " O O O O O .. - C 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C O V C 0 0 0 N N N Np N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N p N�N N 0 N1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N an 66 6,466 ,4OO ^ 00O,! ,- 006000 v00 ,—,@. 000 G 0 O/ O O O O [i C O O O O O O C C O G O N m 3 i 0 0 0 0 0 I MM 0 mo o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 09. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 O.1 0. . 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 O � � G O O , H O m 0 o b v o m m g g g x a ae g g m a g m g g o g g g ae o g e,,, x m ° o . . 0.-I o txm 0 � . 0000°m � � m� m " m m mm -. Nm • g0WgAgg �'grmggam� m5, 5mog1mmmamvm -g° ggmmg V. >rv, . O n e e e � X pp� m e �� m ee � Y Fa !1 12 px g g g g AM I e m a 1 5 M M o m g4 _ Q "i C C o m o a g- o A4 m; g m $ $ 4 3 gX ;" . 1 E �' O U P, 1 8m '46 ,1 8 M M O m ^ M s $ MM sMM M sM ti f aQ . ✓ m . . " . .d S . ti. . . . 444 44 -7 4 " .. . .t O Z• W R' g rv. U 'rl §1 ri' §'1 � rv �° o m8i `8o0'2"irvo0o� § g §iia � a-5 $ om .7ry o _ - .r .+ .r ,4,4,4,. .. " .. .. .. .ti.7.. " .. .44,-C' .7 o ry 2 X M4 o pm H cf: $ 'AHRA F—,R" R 8 Rr.18Rmgom ".-1 . .w. n a ° A *4 " 55 U �O O ry .a O s C N >- .4 m o a Q g p 4 :,CMRHUF., gym ,A FA RHR AIR MERFM 1 x▪ 3 W O J H o " E- ,. . H C Z c°t E v - c ? E o a om N v n g 3? III c v !5' m z m m3 1 a E 1 >S 3 d 3 m n 9 m >? O o a A A 3 N V 3 3 >J A m C wp 4 0 E d t o 'i m ° N 2 v 1 " d a s x E t w wE A j .. € u ° ` E ° .- - °o o - n v E E E E » - H v ° v c . t i ` m —, ViI1 . t 8i15 ?? 1 zizzone c,2 ,' -Mgiaauau a.. rvMamlOnmm ! ° ate rv ;-4mgmNN � NmmmAmmmm4 f bprin.gc.. HiCk00 Collier Apartments by Year Built Bay w .J. 4xit.lutp-a.. .. . .--,,--- - -1,1*.:4=ar,,.•t- -'•••• '' . . ______,......- l!P try Club Cr,' -wt., - ,1„,'„*.-- i ,,, I, (7,0R er V.-._ t , Sanaa., Vtil..x.s. !roper IA tIrTh Cauz'iri t l'; ;-' -....,It C bib Club 'the ,-lub At Quarr.., H. t a Pla“- ride Ea OM(..-•:,11o.ir ;A:Olt:AA . C yilte SS IrlArrtar ,alt,:lut E.sy 1-4-1.1 CarCt.,,== F:rir Immok al yr. Rd 13 ..alasa Pine 5 , Mk Gulf Clik f"..,-1r:art lvlarsh T,t,,,,,,,,, ".':.nlartylr ■aelt Club ,,i0 f C,..`u arri Club c lub i Vaotler bill Basch Rd al = V . . v t Th, id. iney.sr,..1.. Golden iNll. 4 blapie g) Pine R Idg.,Rd El 'GI z . t, 1 r.. z 1 . .6 5 = G. i a . - i ....., .4 5 r. 1.--.,:i r. ; 7.1 a .:1 ..;Golder, o C,c.II Club r, , 3 ma ------ Municipal R adln Fild E6n - a , 4. Airport 51j E 1: Naples Dvis Blvd QI a _4 c] i p 0 Naples a•L 41,, Legend Bay .. CollierApartments_2_14 n3 R allies n skr HammurVd ik YRBLT_ACT .. Hibr,„,u 111111 0-1900 Bay .0,, ■,Ir,,h ' I = 1981 -1990 -, - 1991-2000 2001-2005 \ ,., E1 2006-2014 i c.. -iscu.:Earl.CeLccrne,NAVTEQ,USG S,Irterrn*,iPC,NRCAN,Esri Japan. !ASTI,SsriChina 1Hcrg Kong),Esri{Thailsnc),Tcri* 313 ........■ ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 10/36 CD 01 - IS d .; d IA Co NY Co I.A. N '^ CO W o 01 a co - 4 a Co co a NN{ Co g .i w d v L E co' -.- r1 .1 Co " LO W rn CO 01 Co Al rn W N 0A 00 N. 01 m `a �' n Co Coo O0 mN CO O1 CA CON. 00 CO o N 0' • d d d d ' d .-i d d .-1 .i d ' d d .-i .-i d d d d d 0 d 0 0 d .-1 .-i o Co Co m M N NNN N NN OaNNN pNpp pNN pNN NN 8NN BNNN N8 NNNNNN `QN� 18? B. O O C 011 Co l A ONl .� N 0 LO La O O0i 01 01 N 001 L/1 01i 01 O O 01 011 OMl 01i CI 001 LL/1 en .-1 Ti Co .1 .1 .-1 .-I - .-I .4 .-I .-I .--I .1 .-I .ti ./ . o Co 1 co M N N N VD N N N N N VT N N N N N N N N N N N N N lA V1 N N In N N 0 (0 'l 4o 8 0 p O m p Al N o O 8 0 M a -. O O N N S . � N S N VI M 41. M.-1 N N N i .ti .-I .-I .ti r1 .-I .-I .ti ti .. ,i. .-I .-I .M .-I .ti At ti .ti .-I .i .i .i: .I .1 .ti 0) m m M i) ▪ 0 a 10 Co a O1 Ol 01 N N Al a 0 0 000 O Co 01 ON1 0M0 N 0 O 000 001 Lei n CO W Co 1 Co .. O W m Co 0 Al O Ol Co a O ."i Co Co N Ol Ol Ol .'1 P d .i ' .-i d .-i d d ' d d d d .d .-i .- d .i d d d d .i .-i .-i d d d d d d d d .i d d d d .-i A d = N Co o N N N N Nm N p N N N N N N N N N N N Npp N to N N N N a N N N N N N Na N N 8 N N N N N N N VT n CC H M S .i oo 8 LOO CO Al CO 001 O 001 N CO ON 01 W Al 0Mi Al W Q<l O CO W Al 000 O 001 al O1 co co O W W oo O Ol G ro m N 0 Co .'I .ti .-I .-I N N N .-I .-1 .-I .ti .-1 0 Co Nn N aA N N p N N N p N N N p N N N N N N N N N p N N A N N N N N N p N N N N N N N p N N p N N 0 M n ILA ryry~ O l101 N lD a^a l0 M Co 0 ON M 0 Al a S .a-1 �0 ca., S ON N N M M 8 t�fl a rt01 W pMp 00 to f N Al N N CO 0 .-1 01 O 01 01 O 01 .-I 01 .1 .-1 .i O CO 01 ON O cm O O 0 O .-1 O Cl 01 01 N 00 CA O 0 y O Q . i .I ti i .- c I .4 .- 1 i i.I .ti I .ti I .I .I .i N o N -t .L N N NN Co O al LO O � aa .7 aS O1 Co Al.I Oi O . O O N S S pp O T T N N O Nn Q .-1 .-I d .-1 .4 .-1 d . d .y .-1 .-1 .-1 d O d A d .4 A .i .i ' .41 .i .-I .i O .'I d d .i .-1 N N u s LL Co m .-1• 8N N N N N N aa n N N N N a N N N p A.N N N N a N p n N N N N p N N pIn N N N N N pN Q NI- LA 0 O 001 1�0 0�1 n W i� n N Al Ol Obi c.c...n ^ O 001 T M 00 00 O so, l�f^1 O 1^mA t0 Al .�D l�0 O 00 ©co r,Co .'I .-I .-I .i -I Co Co .i N lA N N N N N N N N N N p V1 N 0 N p 011 p N N p N N N N N N N In to N N N N to In 0 01 N Q C 0�0 O .i tpOp ✓OI S O�1 Co 0 LA .-I LA O .0 .Li a W a N u�l N La .Ln S 10A t011 S W IA 0^O 0m1 h Ovl tN0 N Co L l0 C n n Co Co CO A. n n n co CO n Co n CO CO Co n n N N N. N. 1, N. 1� Co .1 s ar V V c 1 N Y v 5 `0 3 al a �°cn 0 a)cci _ _Ln M N v o1$ E `2 VI - m a a 0 04 > Q a E a, w 0 'n m a v w a Z al y e-I N - > 0 0 - 0. d O N 0 C> Q _, 'V u y a ` L 0 0 ? v cD c,V a T w E . a a) 1 t 0 c 0J J a, `�2 co a ai co >' 3 °. co °' 3 ai aa, 0 .. c y 0 N 0 om n o c m 0 o 0 E CO LA J E E o v u 0 a a a v L L 2 vm v a v v E E „ .., v La) Io 0 > s .' c' 2 o - n E U m_= v n 0. o r m n to CL .0 v C co E E E E > r s a ,.J m` °1 E Q n m y v m v m u mZ 0 0 0 x x Z Z Z Z 0 0 2 2 vl v`Oi .n uti u0i 1'n v0i > 3 '.i' ,.71 .: a! 0 d N.i N M a I/1 O N 00 O1 Co n N M a IA 10 N m 01 0 .-I N M a to 10 N m O1 O n N M a IA 10 N m M O Co A .-1 .1 Al .-1 .i A .1 * .-1 N N N N N N N N N N en M 41 CO M en M CO M M CI 2 Located below is a summary of the historical occupancy and rental rate for each of the apartments comparing January 2011 to December 2013. Overall Occupany Weighted Rent COMPLEX SUMMARY History per SOFT MapID Apartment Year Built Total Units Avg sqft 1_1_2011 12/1/2013 1/1/2011 12/1/2013 1 Bear Creek 1995 120 969 93% 100% $ 0.72 $ 0.92 2 Belvedere 1986 162 612 100% 100% $ 0.62 $ 0.70 3 Berkshire Reserve 2000 146 1,300 81% 100% $ 0.77 $ 0.82 4 Bermuda Island 1999 360 1,051 88% 97% $ 1.06 $ 1.12 5 Brittany Bay I&II 2002 392 1,011 97% 93% $ 0.76 $ 0.85 6 Bryn Mawr 1998 240 938 86% 98% $ 1.02 $ 1.15 7 College Park 1999 210 954 98% 97% $ 0.76 $ 0.90 8 Coral Palms 1987 288 821 90% 100% $ 0.78 $ 0.98 9 Goodlette Arms 1976 250 486 100% 100% $ 1.92 $ 1.75 10 Heritage(MerSoleil) 2001 320 1,012 92% 90% $ 0.70 $ 0.84 11 Heron Park 1997 248 947 100% 96% $ 0.77 $ 1.00 12 Ibis Club 2000 134 1,017 90% 95% $ 0.70 $ 0.79 13 Jasmine Cay 1995 72 1,100 99% 99% $ 0.73 $ 0.88 14 La Costa 1995 276 1,080 94% 92% $ 1.05 $ 1.26 15 Lagu Bay 1989 363 1,027 93% 98% $ 0.91 $ 1.06 16 Malibu Lakes 2002 356 1,057 97% 99% $ 0.99 $ 1.13 17 Meadow Lakes(Saxon Manor) 1997 252 996 92% 98% $ 0.75 $ 0.94 18 Naples 701 1975 188 750 86% 98% $ 0.83 $ 0.97 19 Naples Place I-Ill 1985 160 800 97% 99% $ 0.95 $ 1.06 20 Noah's Landing 2002 264 971 92% 100% $ 0.68 $ 0.88 21 Northgate Club 1988 120 910 92% 90% $ 0.74 $ 0.98 22 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) 1991 216 969 100% 100% $ 0.89 $ 1.03 23 Ospreys Landing 1995 176 1,013 95% 96% $ 0.74 $ 0.86 24 Meadow Brook Preserve(Turtle Creek) 1997 268 952 62% 96% $ 0.80 $ 1.12 25 River Reach 1987 556 902 95% 100% $ 0.85 $ 1.07 26 Sabal Key 1987 200 976 91% 100% $ 0.82 $ 1.04 27 Saddlebrook Village 1999 140 834 98% 99% $ 0.53 $ 0.65 28 San Marino(Aventine) 2001 350 1,092 72% 96% $ 0.84 $ 1.07 29 Shadowood Park 1989 96 1,185 100% 100% $ 0.63 $ 0.74 30 Somerset Palms(Arbor View) 1999 168 1,057 85% 95% $ 0.62 $ 0.72 31 Summer Lakes I 2003 140 1,162 96% 95% $ 0.69 $ 0.84 32 Summer Lakes II 2007 276 1,032 97% 97% $ 0.73 $ 0.88 33 Summer Wind 1986 368 883 98% 97% $ 0.83 $ 1.01 34 Tuscan Isle 2003 298 920 89% 30% $ 0.74 $ 0.88 35 Villas of Capri 1997 235 928 76% 97% $ 0.78 $ 0.99 36 Waverley Place 1990 300 840 78% 97% $ 0.82 $ 0.87 37 Whistler's Cove 1999 240 1,042 96% 90% $ 0.75 $ 0.80 38 Whistler's Green 1999 168 1,051 96% 95% $ 0.74 $ 0.81 39 Windsong Club 1993 120 991 98% 99% $ 0.78 $ 0.84 40 Aster Lely(New) 2014 308 1,153 $ 1.13 41 Sierra Grande(New) 2014 270 1,175 $ 1.09 Average Avg 1996 Total Units 9814 Percent of Total Average Size Average Occupancy 92% 95% Cng from prior period 2°% -1% Average Weighted Rent per sqft $ 0.81 $ 0.96 Cng from prior period 2% 5% ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 12/36 The development of apartments in Collier County started in the mid 1970's with a surge of new development occurring in the mid 1980's which coincided with the first wave of new residential development. As we can see from the graph below,the majority of the apartments built consisted of 1 and 2 bedroom units. The first real influx of 3 bedroom units did not begin until the mid 1990's, following that decade's recession. Development of rental units from the mid 1990's through today consisting primarily of 2 and 3 bedroom units with a very limited supply of 4 bedroom units. Historical Development 1400 1200 1000 —800 600 600 — ` 400 200 ill 171 lD Lfl lD h co 61 0 rl M In r co Ol 0 c-1 N f!) I� C r, co oo co 0o co 0l 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 Q1 Ql 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0l 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 ati .-I ci ci e-I ai a-7 ci a♦ a-i c-1 c-1 a♦ a1 N N N N N N ■Sumof1BR ■Sumof2BR <Sum of3BR Maim of4BR Product size by bedroom count has stayed relatively consistent for the 1 bedroom and has increased slightly for 2 and 3 bedroom units.The few 4 bedroom units are the designs that have increased in size the most. Unit Size by BR Count and YR Built 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 •— "mot �" L111-11fill 1111 I' All 1 II 800 600 911 r to A ■ r 400 l � �i IN rr ' S� ' s■ � 200 ■ I I S I I 1 1 1 r1 1990 1991 1993 1995 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2007 2014 Ave rage of 1BR E Average of 2BR 1:,77:r Ave rageof3BR 011=1Average of 4BR •Linear(Average of 1BR)• —Linear(Average of 2BR) • —Linear(Average of 3BR)•Linear(Average of 4BR) ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 13/36 Located below we will analyze the projects based on their location, age and rental rate per sqft. The chart and graph below represent the weighted rate per sqft based on the unit mix of all the projects.As we can see the rate has increased significantly over the past four years. Average Rate by Bedroom Count Bedroom Count Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 1 Bed $ 0.90 $ 0.94 $0.91 $1.00 $1.11 2 Bed $ 0.77 $ 0.79 $0.80 $0.89 $0.95 3Bed $ 0.71 $ 0.75 $0.73 $0.81 $0.91 4Bed $ 0.76 $ 0.78 $0.81 $0.85 $0.91 Historical Rate $1.15 $1.05 $0.95 $0.85 — $0.75 $0.65 $0.55 - $0.45 $0.35 - - 1� c N. a C � t C ¢ Q ° PC~ P1i ~ ry o 3 � ti ai ti c r 1 i 1 Or PQ Pp qz OTeP,9 ti3 41, --1Bed -2 Bed -3 Bed -4Bed Occupancy has also risen significantly over the past 4 years to the current 95%which represents stabilized occupancy when you consider a 5%turnover rate. Located below is a chart and graph showing the historical occupancy from October 2010 to present. • Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 Avg Occupancy 90% 92% 91% 96% 95% ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 14/36 Historical Occupancy 97% — — — 96% — -- 95% — -- — — 94% — -- 93% — 92% 91% 90% 89% 88% 87% ti0 0 yN N. N. yN , '5, 1. yry y'y yL y1. y'L ti"5 y'5 y'5 03 y'5 Oc} Oe� 42 1-9 loo PJ� Oc` Oe" �c� V9 1 Qoa' Occ Oe� rev PQc lJC PJ� Oc. Oe' —AvgOccupancy The chart and graph below show the rental rates and size by bedroom count for the current period. Bedroom Count Avg Size Dec 2013 Rate 1 Bed 776 $ 1.11 2 Bed 1,015 $ 0.95 3 Bed 1,209 $ 0.91 4 Bed 1,407 $ 0.91 • ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 15/36 Relationship of Avg Size to Rate per sqft 1,600 -- — — -- $1.20 1,400 - $1.00 1,200 - $0.80 1,000 800 $0.60 600 - $0.40 400 . . . - $0.20 200 $- $Bed 2 Bed 3 Bed 4 Bed Avg Size —Dec 2013 Rate 5.1 Market Rate Apartments Market rate apartments were the first developed in the county, with subsidized housing starting in the late 1980's to accommodate the increasing employment for hotels and other hospitality related industries. The mix of units by bedroom count is consistent with the overall supply and is primarily 1 and 2 bedroom units. The major influx of market rate 3 bedroom units did not begin until 2000 when the availability of affordable family accommodations was restricting due to rapidly rising home prices. The majority of rental apartment complexes within the Collier County and the general region, are located on major arterial roadways in order to provide easy access for their tenants, higher visibility for rental apartment marketing and provide reduced land cost in order to make the ensuing rental rate more affordable. Typically rental apartment complexes prefer to be located closer to employment centers and other support facilities within the area. A convenient location is generally considered more desirable as it reduces transportation cost and thus overall living expenses. There are a significant number of approved residential units within existing planned unit developments in Collier County. These units are generally planned for the development of fee simple condominiums and single-family homes catering to people who want to purchase versus rent.The communities that offer amenities such as lakes, golf courses or other open space utilize those amenities to cater to the larger percentage of the market that prefer to purchase real estate. Located below is a chart showing the market rate apartments based on their density. From this analysis,we can see the average for the existing market rate apartment is over 13 units per acre. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 16/36 MapID Apartmentme County Acerage Density Year Built Total Units 2 Belvedere Collier 10.2 15.9 1986 162 3 Berkshire Reserve Collier 11.41 12.8 2000 146 5 Brittany Bay I&II Collier 37.4 10.5 2002 392 6 Bryn Mawr Collier 20 12.0 1998 240 12 Ibis Club Collier 14.43 9.3 2000 134 13 Jasmine Cay Collier 2.5 28.8 1995 72 14 La Costa Collier 31 8.9 1995 276 15 Lagu Bay Collier 38.2 9.5 1989 363 16 Malibu Lakes Collier 24 14.8 2002 356 18 Naples 701 Collier 8.66 21.7 1975 188 19 Naples Place I-Ill Collier 10 16.0 1985 160 21 Northgate Club Collier 9.95 12.1 1988 120 22 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) Collier 18.4 11.7 1991 216 28 San Marino(Aventine) Collier 40 8.8 2001 350 29 Shadowood Park Collier 13.3 7.2 1989 96 33 Summer Wind Collier 29 12.7 1986 368 36 Waverley Place Collier 27.3 11.0 1990 300 Average 20.34 13.16 1992 231.71 Located below is a map showing the location of the market rate apartments followed by graphs and charts summarizing these projects. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 17/36 titbit..__ Collier Market Rate Apartments t c kor ,v B i`ounl :lub J• t ti OMyratu%-- iaubet NestGolf6 collier Cauniry t !ub E;;eserae hkrdsfarra 'Duna ry Club Banta, V Cage. Club At The r]uatl Creek Impanel Sdrarui COu Ulf y Golf Club Club }he Club At C"u7rry F: la P!a a OM. -'- Clii`:.:-I'r r Golf Clilt. Gybes; Herdafe ∎,0■.I,V. �-1, Oaf -a�? CCC3 .3.f*_^c'e ?R"F:• if kalaa Rd u . Pines 5 io if Club Pets an h1.,r_h ftburolt arrietbilt .. Golf Club Golf Country I Club 'lub m Vanderbilt Beach Rd rt cc ti 22 It Golden 15 m�.,�,rd-- •< • ,f tfr;da= Pine Reif-1d 2 ,� WV 5 • 13 J _ et 33 21 m a 19 ��z S a a 1 a 3 Y o u n a Ca c 6. +4 G � R,r-i — c .t.'.1 . tdcpdes ___.. Gorden`.:a' m : Gr_n.f o :icy•Club ,` �•.. ,.:_„ o ^�,..^ > Ilat:les 12 J I Municipal Ractin Rd 3 .Atrp'll A I s Naples Davis Wad ea 28 N ap/es 18 . Bay c t 4Q c2 Rattlesnake Hammock R MI 14tt+x u s PIM eloM''lab ;' ()OYir7r 43, Chin ' Bay • % Legend IKe ayOm 3? • YearEndl3MarketScore ttti } 1l Scums:Esti.Celerme,$AVTEO,USGS,Irt rmapfi+FC,HRCAH,Esrl Japan, 1 161ET1 Esri China;Hone KKhgl.Esri(Thailand),Terfcm,2313 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 18/36 Historical Development Market 800 700 *` 600 �r 500 400 300 "- �' 200 0 1975 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990 1991 1995 1998 2000 2001 2002 2014 ■Sum of 1BRU ■Sum of 2BRU Sum of 3 BRU ■Sum of 4BRU Product size by bedroom count has stayed relatively consistent for the 1 bedroom and has increased slightly for 2 and 3 bedroom units. Unit Size by BR Count and YR Built - Market 1600 — 1400 fi • 1111■10 COM 7110 :44 1200 ... �, 1000 � T �' 800 � r .• p _� . � P 600 • • • ;111- 11 • 1 • 11r1 400 � • • • I I . 1 • U 200 ■ ■ � I • • I I 1 $ 0 ■ • 1 I ■ • 1411 1975 1985 1986 1988 1989 1990 1991 1995 1998 2000 2001 2002 2014 Average of 1BRS SIM Average of 2BRS A Average of 3BRS MINI Ave rage of4BRS Linear(Average of 1BRS)• •Linear(Average of 2BRS) • •Linear(Average of 3BRS) Located below we will analyze the projects based on their location, age and rental rate per sqft. The chart and graph below represent the weighted rate per sqft based on the unit mix of the market rate projects only. As we can see the rate has increased significantly over the past four years. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 19/36 Average Rate by Bedroom Count-Market Bedroom Count Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 1 Bed $ 0.90 $ 0.93 $0.92 $1.02 $1.11 2 Bed $ 0.83 $ 0.85 $0.84 $0.92 $0.99 3 Bed $ 0.80 $ 0.81 $0.80 $0.85 $0.97 4 Bed $ 0.80 $ 0.86 $0.86 $0.92 $0.94 Historical Rate-Market $1.15 $1.05 $0.95 $0.85 —� -- $0.75 $0.65 $0.55 $0.45 -- — —. ——$0.35 r\ O O 1 'ti 1 '1 1 1 'L 'L 'L 'L 'L 'L 3 '4 '� '4 °01 PQc: lJ~POa'~Oc °ti °o~PQ~'J~Poi, O,a. p°�1 deb~ Q1,J 1 J4,p°��p�1 —1 Bed —2 Bed "...,-.-.3 Bed --4 Bed Occupancy has also risen significantly over the past 4 years to the current 97%which represents stabilized occupancy when you consider a 3%turnover rate. Located below is a chart and graph showing the historical occupancy from October 2010 to present. Market Rate Oct-10 Jan-11 Oct-11 Mar-13 Dec-13 Avg Occupancy 88% 92% 90% 97% 97% ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 20/36 Historical Occupancy-Market 98% ---- — -- --- 96% --- -- -- 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% _- --Avg Occupancy The chart and graph below show the market rental rates and size by bedroom count for the current period. Market Rate Bedroom Count Avg Size Dec 2013 Rate zaed 826 $ 1.11 zoed 1,047 $ 0.99 3 Bed 1,277 $ 0.97 4oed 1,501 $ 0.94 Relationship of Avg Size to Rate per sqft-Market 1.600 -- $1.20 1,400 -- -- -`� $1.00 �� 1,200 — MIN $0.80 800 $0.^o mm $0.40 400 --- $0.20 200 ---- ---- *' zBeu zBe^ sBeu ^Be^ 1011111*ma" —Dec��Rate CD 2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,An Rights Reserved. 21 /36 '--- The market rate apartments are located primarily in the southern portion of the county and have easy access to the employment centers. The newest projects are located in this area due to the availability of land and the lower land cost. 6.0 MARKET PERFORMANCE SCORE The consultant developed a market performance score for each rental apartment complex using age, average occupancy and average rental rate per sqft as criteria. Other subjective criteria, such as condition, management quality, renter profile, etc can be added to the scoring system to enhance the comparison. After the score has been determined, each sites score is mapped to see the spatial distribution of the best performing complexes. For this study, we are only reporting on the market rate projects. After we have determined the criteria for the score, we developed a ranking system for each criterion. In this case a score of between 1 and 5 was selected for each criterion with assigned thresholds for each. The thresholds range from one, which represents an older or lower attribute and five, which newer and a higher attribute. Located below are the criteria and the ranking for each criterion. Age(yrs) lo hi score 0 5 5 6 10 4 11 15 3 16 20 2 20 1000 1 Occupancy(%). to hi score r� 95.00% 5 90.00% 94.90% 4 80.00% 89.90% 3 75.00% 79.90% 2 75.00% 1 Rent/Saft(SI to hi score $0.90000 5 $0.80000 $0.89990 4 $0.70000 $0.79999 3 $0.60000 $0.69999 2 $0.60000 1 A score was assigned to each attribute for each rental apartment complex. Once each attribute is assigned for each rental apartment complex, we weighted each to calculate a final score. Located below is the weighting we assigned to each attributes score. Weights Age 15% Occupancy 50% Rent/Sqft 35% 100% Below are the individual scores for age,occupancy and rental rate per sqft for each of the market rate complexes and the final weighted average score. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 22/36 Project MapID Age Occupancy Rate sqft Market 12/2013 score Belvedere 2 1 5 3 1 4.7 Berkshire Reserve 3 3 5 4 1 5.4 Brittany Bay I &II 5 3 4 4 1 4.9 Bryn Mawr 6 2 5 1 1 4.2 Ibis Club 12 3 5 1 1 4.3 Jasmine Cay 13 2 5 4 1 5.2 La Costa 14 2 4 5 1 5.1 Lagu Bay 15 1 5 5 1 5.4 Malibu Lakes 16 3 5 5 1 5.7 Naples 701 18 1 5 5 1 5.4 Naples Place I-Ill 19 1 5 5 1 5.4 Northgate Club 21 1 4 5 1 4.9 Oasis ofples(Arbor Walk) 22 1 5 5 1 5.4 San Marino(Aventine) 28 3 5 5 1 5.7 Shadowood Park 29 1 5 3 1 4.7 Summer Wind 33 1 5 5 1 5.4 Waverley Place 36 1 5 4 1 5.1 Aster Lely 40 5 1 5 1 4.0 Sierra Grande 41 5 1 5 1 4.0 The final weighted scores range from a low of 4.0 for Aster Lely and Sierra Grande because they are in the lease up stage of their development to a high of 5.7 for Aventine and Malibu Lakes due to their newer age. In order to identify the spatial distribution of the best performing sites, we mapped each complex and delineated the score range by color code. Located below is a map of the market rate apartment complexes by final weighted score. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 23/36 ,;;;: __ . Collier Market Rate Apartments • [ntr , , - ?r ' 11111 C5uail.._ a . +_ouldry Club !1111 7,1 r e.t!�oll 6 .. •...._... ..._ _ C u1her Me-11foot., r<e-:*44e ountry Club ,.415.44 ■,luta At The Quad!:teek ImF.rial - •tretni Country. CKAI C.tub Club The Club At 4uarry R,^ I.a Plana 0 lie Dag . .:.t.-:r ,,u11Club CjtNea, HerRage Bay •41 Co�7�^at;-,e-e r"t'wcr- 1 Ion R I 77 I g I :elusa 1 I Pines 3oYiClub ruhcan harsh Ttburou •,aaderbill idlIClub (;nit :;cuntry I Club ... . Vandeibilt Beath Rd t. r re V The WUmefatUs Bolden 1Wapfr, 33 m gt ...... VEY K z. ,, a 19 w z a d r a C J C t-I ples -- - . Golden tiffs R • 3 Grangy p Cott Cluh. . isNaples vlunicipal Radru Rd m IF Airport ..1 8 ; O Nafyler Davis Blvd' 84" 1 28 G Legend Napier; Ba•r 1:11 '-': Dec_13_sco T 4° C] R attleunake •Ran:murk R CI • Less than 3.5 t 1bi-f US • 3.51 to 4 Donal c entr,P ' . . club . O 4.1 to 4.5 1 • Bey �S, (i 4.51 to 5 Kter'.�3y�hn �� } 0 Over 5 \ t c< dit SevcES:Earl CeLame;tQA1REC.USGS.IntermsFf,tF•C,tJ P.CAN,Esri.lapan, METI,Esri China;Hcng K60g1,Esri(Thailand).Tclh'Tem.2313 r... ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 24136 The highest scoring apartment complexes are Avertine, located in Collier Blvd, '/ south of Interstate 75 and Malibu Lakes, located south of Immokalee Road adjacent to 1-75. These two communities have similar designs as they offer limited garages and extensive amenities. The other North Naples apartment complexes are located along Pine Ridge Road and have easy access to 1-75, however they are older and reflect dated amenities and unit designs. The existing supply of market rate apartment complexes are enjoying high occupancies and increasing rental rates due to the lack of apartment complexes in the market and more importantly an increase fee simple housing cost which is directing the consumer to the few rental market options available. 7.0 NEW RENTAL APARTMENT SUMMARY The stabilized occupancy of the existing market rate apartments has prompted the development of two new apartment communities.These are located within 1/2 mile of each other on Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Blvd in South Naples. Located below is a map showing the location of each complex followed by a brief summary. , ; 7.-.-, '- • 1.', Collier New Apartments iir , � . t i Y` -• --- `. I f—� �ti _ ' it '�Ti r f l Aster of Naples 00,00.00.400\ — -......-------.-- ---"Lr--..--_: , 7---,,, Aio ! 14 . (. , ie" r t. Legend !�tA81fui* '`- ti aha:a n ,rw ,., su nmmi• ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 25/36 Seirra Grande Sierra Grande is located on Rattlesnake Hammock Road,just west of the intersection of Collier Blvd.This community was originally developed as for sale condominiums which failed during the great recession. Two buildings were completed and 27 units were sold to individual owners and the remaining units owned by the rental developer and rented as the new units. The site was purchased in June of 2011 for $5,150,00 (OR 4689 PG 3233) for 282 of which 273 are vacant land and 9 area foreclosed units from the prior project.The average of all units was$18,262.The site infrastructure was in place at the time of the sale.This site is 17.9 acres representing a gross density of 10.11 units per acre. The 273 units are divided into 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments ranging in size from 902 sqft to 1,313 sqft. There are 32, three bedroom units, 161, two bedroom units and 80, one bedroom units. The community began leasing the existing units in March of 2013 with the release of newly developing units in January of 2014. Of the seven total buildings, 2 are completed and leased or occupied by individual condominium owners and three buildings are under construction.The site visit revealed significant interest as there were people waiting to see a leasing agent.The newly developing buildings are expected to be ready for occupancy by May. Aster of Lely Aster of Lely is located on southwest corner of Lely Cultural Blvd and Collier Blvd, '/%mile south of the intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road.This site was vacant at the time of sale and was sold in April of 2007 for$8,635,000 (OR 4210 PG 1766)for 308 units for a price per unit of $28,035. No site infrastructure was included in this sale.This site is 17.79 acres and has a gross density of 17.4 units per acre. As of the updated report, current pricing and availability buildings have been released. This community will consist of 11 buildings and an amenity center, of which five building are complete and available for lease as of this report date. Located below is a summary of the current pricing for each floorplan and the number of unit available of 210 being offered at this time. Floorplan Rental Rat BR Bath SQFT Rent/sqft Available Al 1050 1 1 820 $ 1.28 36 A2 1075 1 1 890 $ 1.21 53 B1 1300 2 2 1100 $ 1.18 4 B2 1325 2 2 1195 $ 1.11 82 Cl 1600 3 2 1435 $ 1.11 11 Total 186 The product mix, unit size and rental rate are consistent with the other market rate rental apartments used in this study. 8.0 FEE SIMPLE CONDOMINIUM RENTALS The consultant also reviewed fee simple condominiums that are rented on an annual basis. The source for this information was the Naples (Multiple Listing Service) MLS. There are several condominium developments that offer comparable amenities and pricing, but were designed to cater to the second home buyer and not designed for rental. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 26/36 The main difference between the fee simple condominium rentals and the apartment rentals is the building design. Rental Apartments are designed for lower construction cost and generally have less exterior windows and have adjacent units on three sides. The market rental rate does not distinguish a difference for design or amenities, but does distinguish a difference for interior finishes. Located below is a summary of the current listings of condominium units available for annual rentals in Collier County based on the March 1, 2014 Naples MLS system, followed by a map showing the location of the NABOR MLS areas. Location Avg Size Avg$/sqft NA05-Crayton Rd Area 1209 $2.07 NA06-Olde Naples Area 1851 $1.95 NA02-Vanderbilt Beach Area 1107 $1.81 NA04-Pelican Bay Area 1669 $1.66 NA15-E/O 41 W/O Goodlette 1200 $1.50 NA12-N/O Vanderbilt Bch Rd W/O 75 1626 $1.40 NA01 -N/O 111th Ave 1547 $1.30 NA21 -N/O Immokalee Rd E/O 75 1419 $1.23 NA16-S/O Pine Ridge Rd 1358 $1.21 NA14-N/O Pine Ridge Rd and Vineyards 1634 $1.21 NA08-Royal Harbor-Windstar Area 1210 $1.19 NA24-Golden Gate City 757 $1.13 NA17-N/O Davis Blvd 1230 $1.12 NA13-Pine Ridge Area 1042 $1.12 NA11 -N/O Immokalee Rd W/O 75 1642 $1.12 NA18-N/O Rattlesnake Hammock 1393 $1.05 NA09-South Naples Area 1579 $1.04 NA38-South of US41 East of 951 1538 $0.98 NA19-Lely Area 1279 $0.91 NA37-East Collier S/0 75 E/O 951 1351 $0.87 NA22-S/O Immokalee Rd W/O 951 1996 $0.85 Grand Total 1461 $1.28 • ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 27/36 NABOR MLS Areas 001111.0 Spnn35 e .e>P .a,aaa = NA01 NA11 NA21 r. , t 1 NA31 NA12 NA22 NA04 Al NA14 Co,don 0.a awcw r-. NA16 NA23 I I_,I NAO5 NA24 1 NA773.. sp=rraarne ,__ , u,ll_, WAD, NA18 NA08 NA07 L I; NA19 NA09 per!\ Sovices:Esri,HERE.CeLarme,USGS.Inte•map,ircerrent P Corp..NAf.1rtt. Ear Japan,METI,E3ri China!Hong Kong).Esri{Thailand).TcrT m, Mapmylndia,S CpenStreetM4ap •ntributos,and thee-IS User Community $�. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 28/36 The list above shows the average living area size and price per sqft for the condominiums available for rent by area of the county. The top 5 areas offer waterfront or high end product for rent which is superior in quality and location to the rental apartments in the market. The rental rate for the condominiums in areas where the majority of the rental apartments are located are consistent in price, however are older in age. Located below is a list of condominium rentals that are considered most comparable to the rental apartment markets. Location/Condo Name Avg Size Avg$/sgft Location/Condo Name Avg Size Avg$/sgft NA15-E/O 41 W/O Goodlette 1200 $1.50 NA17-N/O Davis Blvd 1230 $1.12 HIGH POINT COUNTRY CLUB 1200 $1.50 BLUE HERON 1000 $1.18 NA01-N/O 111th Ave 1547 $1.30 COUNTRYSIDE CONDOS 1150 $1.39 BARBADOS 1515 $1.15 ENCLAVE OF NAPLES 874 $1.25 FALLING WATERS NORTH PRESERVE 1586 $0.82 GLENMOOR GREENS 1300 $0.96 MARTINIQUE 1225 $1.18 JASPER 1484 $0.98 SEAGROVE 2061 $1.36 NEW WATERFORD 1212 $1.24 SWEETWATER BAY 1381 $2.17 NEWCASTLE 1450 $1.02 NA12-NIO Vanderbilt Bch Rd W/O 75 1534 $1.24 OPAL 1406 $0.92 CARRINGTON 1250 $1.20 PRESERVE AT THE SHORES 1406 $1.07 CRESCENT GARDENS 1563 $0.96 SHERWOOD 1630 $0.86 EGRETS WALK 1681 $1.34 SPRINGWOOD 1000 $1.15 FIELDSTONE VILLAGE 1456 $1.17 TIMBER LAKE 1340 $1.34 RAVENNA 2015 $1.24 NA13-Pine Ridge Area 1042 $1.12 VICTORIA LAKES 1089 $1.15 MISTY PINES 1242 $1.05 WILSHIRE PINES 1391 $1.44 TURTLE LAKE GOLF COLONY 842 $1.19 NA21-N/O Imnokalee Rd E/O 75 1419 $1.23 NA11-N/O Immokalee Rd W/O 75 1642 $1.12 CYPRESS TRACE 1538 $1.48 EAGLE COVE 1621 $0.86 CYPRESS WOODS GOLF+COUNTRY CLUB 1373 $0.95 FEATHER SOUND 1449 $1.04 GRAND CYPRESS II 1763 $0.85 RIVER ROYALE 1400 $1.29 HUNTINGTON LAKES 1107 $1.63 SPOONBILL COVE 1928 $0.88 TERRACE 1194 $0.96 SWEETWATER BAY 1167 $1.19 NA16-S/O Pine Ridge Rd 1358 $1.21 TOSCANA 2822 $1.59 COLONYATHAWKSRIDGE 1650 $1.15 VERONAPOINTE 1580 $0.89 FAIRWAYS AT EMERALD GREEN 1167 $1.03 NA18-NIO Rattlesnake Hammock 1393 $1.05 KENSINGTON 2686 $1.12 AMBERLY VILLAGE 1216 $1.23 MARBELLALAKES 2143 $0.89 CROWNPOINTESHORES 1585 $0.88 MARIPOSA 1558 $1.16 GLADES COUNTRY CLUB 1270 $1.26 NAPLES BATH AND TENNIS CLUB 1319 $1.27 JASMINE COURT 1249 $1.12 POSITANO PLACE 1067 $1.35 LAKE ARROWHEAD 1928 $0.90 RESERVE AT NAPLES 1107 $1.04 LELY PINES 1032 $0.94 TURTLE LAKE GOLF COLONY 842 $1.46 NAPOLI 1033 $1.09 NA14-N/O Pine Ridge Rd and Vineyards 1634 $1.21 RMERA COLONY GOLF ESTATES 1200 $1.13 AVELLINO ISLES 3141 $1.07 VERANDA AT SOUTHERN LINKS 1661 $1.20 AVIANO 2184 $0.87 NA09-South Naples Area 1579 $1.04 BARRINGTON 1216 $1.15 ABACO BAY 886 $1.02 BELLERIVE 1708 $1.00 BOTANICAL PLACE 1968 $0.79 CALUSA BAY NORTH 1282 $1.40 DI NAPOLI 1883 $1.33 CALUSA BAY SOUTH 1982 $1.06 NA38-South of US41 East of 951 1538 $0.98 EMERALD LAKES 1111 $1.33 SONOMA 2110 $0.92 LAKESIDE 1348 $2.23 TROPIC SCHOONER APTS 966 $1.04 LALIQUE 2050 $1.27 NA19-LelyArea 1279 $0.91 OASIS 861 $1.20 EAGLEWOOD 1250 $0.80 ORCHARDS 1607 $1.12 STMORITZCLUB 1294 $1.00 RUM BAY 1315 $1.14 ST REGIS CLUB 1294 $0.93 SILVER OAKS 1595 $1.12 NA37-East Collier S/O 75 E/O 951 1351 $0.87 NA24-Golden Gate City 757 $1.13 FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT 1351 $0.87 FAIRWAYS AT PAR ONE 735 $1.16 NA22-S/0 lmmokalee Rd W/O 951 1996 $0.85 FAIRWAYS AT PAR TWO 768 $1.11 BIMINI BAY 2170 $0.88 FALLS OF PORTOFINO 1822 $0.82 Grand Total 1436 $1.15 As we can see from the above list, the apartments range in size from a low of 735 sqft to a high of over 3,000 sqft and average approximately 1,436 sqft. Many of these communities cater to second home buyers or seasonal renters who are generally older than the typical rental apartment tenant. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 29/36 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMANDATIONS The review of the rental apartment market and rental condominiums reveals a current shortage of units available for occupancy.The additional of 581 rental units within Sierra Grande and Aster at Naples will alleviate some of this shortage and may move tenants from older complexes in other parts of the county to these new projects. Location is still a very important factor when renting a unit, however pricing for that location is a differentiator between renting an apartment complex of a fee simple condominium. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 30/36 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS In conducting this market analysis,the consultant has assumed,where applicable, that: 1. Title to the land is good and marketable. 2. The information supplied by others is correct, and the revenue stamps placed on the deeds used to indicate the sale prices are in correct relation to the actual dollar amounts of the individual transactions. 3. There are no hidden or undisclosed sub-soil conditions. No consideration has been given to oil or mineral rights, if outstanding. 4. All general codes, ordinances, regulations or statutes affecting the property have been and will be enforced and the property is not subject to floodplain or utility restrictions or moratoriums except as reported to your consultant and contained in this report. 5. The party for whom this report is prepared has reported to the consultant no original existing conditions or development plans that would subject this property to the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission or similar agencies on the state or local level. 6. No responsibility is assumed by the consultant for legal matters, nor is any opinion on title rendered herewith. 7. The consultant herein,by reason of this report, is not to be required to give testimony in court with reference to the property analyzed, unless arrangements have been previously made. 8. The consultant has made no survey of the property and assumes no responsibility in connection with such matters. Any sketch or identified survey of the property included in this report is only for the purpose of assisting the reader to visualize the property. 9. No environmental impact studies were either requested or made in conjunction with this study, and the consultant hereby reserves the right to alter, amend, revise, or rescind any of the opinions based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies, research or investigation. 10. Unless stated otherwise, no percolation tests have been performed on this property. In making the study, it has been assumed that the property is capable of passing such tests so as to be developable to its highest and best use, as discussed in this report. 11. Certain data used in compiling this report was furnished by the client,his counsel,employees, and/or agent, or from other sources believed reliable. Data has been checked for accuracy as possible, but no liability or responsibility may be assumed for complete accuracy. 12. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in nature, nor is any opinion rendered herein as to title, which is assumed to be good and merchantable. The property is assumed to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, unless specifically enumerated herein, and under responsible ownership and management as of the date of this study. 13. The forecasts or projections included in this report are used to assist in the process and are based on current market conditions, anticipated short-term supply and demand factors, and a stable economy. These forecasts are therefore subject to changes in future conditions. 14. The consultant has relied upon the demographic data provided by local, state and national sources in order to project population trends, housing trends, gross sales trends, and economic trends for the subject area. The information relied upon is referenced within the applicable section of this report.The consultant does not warrant its accuracy. 15. The consultant has obtained data regarding building permits for single family and multi family products from several sources. It is the consultant's understanding that multi family permits are those for condominiums and for rental apartment complexes. The rental apartment complexes which are known to the consultant have been omitted from this analysis. This, therefore,would reflect condominium unit development as reflected and would correlate with condominium sales based upon the local, state and national sources. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 31 /36 16. The consultant has obtained data regarding building sales for single family and multi family products from local, state and national sources. This data includes Developer sales to end users and does not include on your lot sales or construction end loan sales. The consultant cannot warrant the accuracy of the data from this source.The consultant has segmented and amended the data based on market knowledge of the general market; however, no individual sales have been verified. The sales used from these sources reflect statistical trends, with larger samples of data providing a heavier weighting and smaller sample size results in less weighted percentage of the total market. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 32/36 RESTRICTION UPON DISCLOSURE AND USE The by-laws and Regulations of the Appraisal Institute govern disclosure of the contents of this report. Michael J. Timmerman, SRA is a Member of the Appraisal Institute. The by-laws and Regulations of the Institute require each Member and Candidate to control the use and distribution of each report signed by such Member. This market study report and the contents and data contained herein are confidential and are proprietary property of Fishkind & Associates, Inc. No reproductions of any sort or release of any proprietary information contained within may be released without prior written consent of Fishkind & Associates, Inc. Furthermore, neither all nor any part of this report shall be disseminated to the general public by use of advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media, or other media for public communication without prior written consent of the signatories of this report. This report is for internal use of GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, INC. exclusively. The undersigned agrees to the confidentiality agreement. This is copy number of ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 33/36 COPYRIGHT, TRADEMARK AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER Copyright This report published by RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC.hereby referred to as""THE REPORT"',including,but not limited to, text, graphics, photographs, graphs, illustrations, data, images, are protected by copyright law. Copyright © 2014 RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. All rights reserved. All materials provided by RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC.shall be used by the subscriber(the"User")only for the User's own authorized purposes,and may not be modified,published,reproduced in any manner,sold,distributed or in any way transferred to any person,corporation, organization,subsidiary or branch,in whole or in part,without the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. Possession of these materials does not carry with it the right of publication thereof or to use the name of in any manner without first obtaining the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC. No abstracting,excerpting,or summarization of these materials may be made without first obtaining the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC. These materials are not to be used in conjunction with any public or private offering of securities or other similar purpose where they may be relied upon to any degree by any person without first obtaining the prior written consent of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. These materials may not be used for purposes other than that for which they are prepared or for which prior written consent first has been obtained from RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. Disclaimer THE INFORMATION IN "THE REPORT" IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. The materials and information provided in "THE REPORT" by RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. constitute raw data, factual materials and the opinions of RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC. Neither RESORTPROPERTIES.COM,INC.nor any of its affiliates,employees or agents will have any liability of any kind to the user, subscriber or any employee, agent, or contractor of the subscriber or to any other person using the information and materials herein or for any error or omissions herein or for any opinions or conclusions expressed. Other than as set forth expressly herein,RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. makes no warranties,expressed or implied concerning the accuracy of the materials or information provided herein. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 34/36 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE Your use of THE REPORT constitutes your agreement to be bound by these terms and conditions. THE REPORT is a service made available by RESORTPROPERTIES.COM, INC. (the "COMPANY") and all content, information and definitions provided in and through the Housing Demand Report ("Information") may be used solely by you (the"User") under the following terms and conditions ("Terms of Use"): 1.) Subscription. As an authorized user of THE REPORT, User is granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable, revocable, limited license to access and use THE REPORT and Information in accordance with these Terms of Use. Company may terminate this subscription at any time for any reason. 2.) Limitations on Use. The Information in THE REPORT is for authorized use only and not for commercial exploitation. User may not decompile, disassemble, rent, lease, loan, sell, sublicense, copy or create derivative works from THE REPORT or the Information. User may not copy, modify, reproduce, republish, distribute, display, or transmit for commercial, nonprofit or public purposes all or any portion of THE REPORT, except to the extent authorized by the Company. Any unauthorized use of THE REPORT or its Information is prohibited. 3.) No Solicitation. In no event may any person or entity solicit any Users with data retrieved from this THE REPORT. 4.) Intellectual Property Rights. Except as expressly provided in these Terms of Use, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right, by implication, estoppel or otherwise,under copyright or other intellectual property rights. User agrees that the Information and THE REPORT are protected by copyrights,trademarks, service marks, patents or other proprietary rights and laws. For additional information see Copyright. 5.) Unlawful Activity. Company reserves the right to investigate complaints or reported violations of the Terms of Use and to take any action deemed appropriate including, but not limited to, reporting any suspected unlawful activity to law enforcement officials, regulators, or other third parties and disclosing any information necessary or appropriate to such persons or entities relating to user profiles, e-mail address, usage history, posted materials, IP addresses and traffic information. 6.) Remedies for Violations. Company reserves the right to seek all remedies available at law and in equity for violations of these Terms of Use including, but not limited to, the right to cancel THE REPORT. 7.) Modifications to Terms of Use. Company reserves the right to change these Terms of Use at any time. Updated versions of the Terms of Use will appear in THE REPORT and are effective immediately. User is responsible for regularly reviewing the Terms of Use. Continued use of THE REPORT after any such changes constitutes User's consent to such changes. ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 35/36 ©2014 ResortProperties.com, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 36/36 _i Proposed Community Retail Center Growth Management Plan Amendment Commercial Needs Analysis Vincentian Mixed Use Sub District January 31 , 2014 Updated July 31, 2014 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples, LLC Prepared by: Michael J Timmerman, CRE, FRICS, SRA MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. 1415 Panther Lane Suite 428 Naples, Florida 34109 239-269-0769 ATTACHMENT "E" Contents 1.0 Introduction 2 1.1 Purpose 2 1.2 Overview of Needs Analysis 2 1.3 Definition of the Market Area and Target Population 3 1.4 Analysis Process 8 2.0 The Supply of Commercial Space 8 2.1 Project Primary Market 8 3.0 Proposed Amendment Impact on the Supply 14 4.0 Analysis of the Need for the Proposed Amendment to the Market 14 4.1 Overview 14 4.2 Demand for Commercial Space in the Project's Market Area and the Allocation Ratio 15 5.0 Conclusions 19 APPENDIX A 1 20 Retail Demand Methodology 20 1.0 Methodology 20 2.0 Aggregate Market- Retail Demand 20 APPENDIX A 2 26 APPENDIX A 3 27 1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose As we understand it, GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES, LLC ("Client")would like MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. ("Consultant") to prepare commercial needs analysis on the 31+/- acre site located on the south site of US 41 south in Collier County, FL. MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. ("Consultant") has been engaged to prepare this report. 1.2 Overview of Needs Analysis The process for determining the need for additional commercial square footage takes the form of a comparison of: The supply of existing and vacant land currently planned for various commercial uses; The demand for commercial square footage based on projected population/households in the market Historically, these comparisons have focused their studies County-wide. This analysis studies the market for commercial retail demand within a defined market area surrounding the site. There are two related reasons for this type of analysis. First, consumers are assumed to maximize benefit over all goods and services consumed subject to their income. This type of analysis requires that travel costs are either explicitly or implicitly accounted for during the consideration of the consumers' income constraint. This analysis requires the Consultant to narrow the scope of the analysis from the county level down to a local market level. Second, the Consultant considers whether the choice of location is a Pareto improvement for consumers. (Pareto improvement means that no consumers are made worse off, and at least one is made better off.) That is, the Consultant asks the question whether additional retail space makes at least one local market better off, without reducing the welfare of all others. An analysis of commercial retail space over the whole of a County may lead to the wrong conclusion of where to develop new space. That is, the county as a whole may appear to need more retail space to support the aggregate level of demand generated by its residents. This is precisely the outcome the County wants to avoid. Therefore: • By narrowing the focus of this study to the local market, the Consultant determines if this market has a need for additional retail space. • The Consultant can replicate a competitive outcome, and ensure that the welfare of all other local markets is improved or unchanged. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 2 1.3 Definition of the Market Area and Target Population The site is a 31+/- acre parcel located at 11480 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113. The site is east of the City of Naples and across US 41 from Eagle Lakes County Park. The site is current classified as Vacant Residential and is located in the Urban Coast Fringe Future Land Use district. Located below is the information on the site from the Collier County Property Appraiser. PIN 00439880008 502632 ALTKEY 002.0005B32 ACRES_GIS 31.09 GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF O_NAME1 NAPLES 2614 TAMIAMI TRL O_NAME2 N STE 615 O_CFTY NAPLES O_STATE FL O_ZIPCODE 34103 11480 TAMIAMI TRL S_ADDRESS E S_CITY NA S_ZIPCODE 34113 SALE1_AMT $ 2,025,000 SALE1_YEAR 2010 SALEI_DATE 2010-11-02 SALEI_BK 4620 SALE1_PG 1385 SALE2_AMT $ 5,590,000 SALE2_YEAR 2010 SALE2_DATE 2010-01-21 SALE2_BK 4532 SALE2_PG 3068 SALE3_AMT $ 2,100,000 SALE3_YEAR 2004 SALE3_DATE 2004-05-20 SALE3_BK 3568 SALE3_PG 2789 LUSEDOR 00 LUSEDOR D Vacant Residential Located below is a map showing the regional location of the site and an aerial showing the surrounding uses. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 3 -1.. r...,.,,t,..•Ig r..., Site Location within the region ...--... 2 .. „: 7 Fr fi a. 1 1 ■I 4. ,,-..,....¢:!,/,,z ii ....1 i, 'ii 4.0.s. .:34to Fla oos 01.1 ,_ ,__iiii ,,,,,ww.apr.khow.R.Omp I !,y17,1j,,,C 1 ''' 141+3,-:...1.'",11 G 1,..F:73.2.1f:4,,1 11 I 11mEI Nd . Otrt.e.5 'i .."X 2 1.—.,),•', :I'‘..." Sam,, •. t a n a 1 ,,,,t,,,,,,,,, .4/1 I FI• i 5 ..a ' i c". ,i41,:L:0 t at- a It Pattie:,ake Hammock Rd - . % s, 5 ., ,,..^ ' It, ■,,,,,, ''., .1...- ,,z „She, ft, • ■ ,........ . ■ 4444.41 • .. ,.% , u ' %,,,......,...,, ...''''''''''''. i..c.,■el, •-.4.,,, 44'6%,, :!,, ir tr:II 44 Nk1 c••••0 •...i.1.1..i, , 17 • 1...,1 k I...< . Z V., Legend 4' 1.1 SubjectSite Scums:Earl CaLcrrne.NAVTEC,liS,95,intarrrap, C.NRCAN,Esri Japan, FAUN,Earl C hira;Hen Kong).Earl;Thailand),TemTcm.2513 s•:, , • ........, ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 4 r, • .. \ '',. ; ,;tNr# Aerial View of site rte, i '�e ;.. ,*#, .' i� 3`.4),5:1.4°.16., r t, ,j�)r' ' �kr ? p , .fir`r; 1�e 3/r Nx , S r• k' 'r"'�..k�, � �-' �_ ."4� `. s � �► ". �� ,i � r- iii �- � ?e a f • -ykt. •riX+,_ i., , ,�ti,f Jar '., Y J S- t - 7 !. a O A4 ., • l`' � : r� x4! ' : i e J441.4kAti tit' y #•r�.0.i '' •. 0 4 1 1t fir ad . ' ', 4-1,,,,,,,,t y F } . ,... ti 1 1* •fit. - ' 1 i. r- '., 1 i k *•9 wf •4i r r I •{ i . .4_ --„ .. glik I ‘\k,Nsr..s. ili•mr 0 s.0 -,. .5 \<-'- .*.-s- \ '.4(y 1r� ll *777♦ k . .,, , , ‘, .... . „raring.: . ,, ' - , -- -.074 t r . t . - �.aru { .s YIwM w ate-:_ t l " Y"/ , .►'. 14 x -{ e• r . .. y. fk 4,1.t'e a :,• t i j .R if r ,,r! x1 • -. rjisi/i Legend ail L I SubjectSite , 'r } ter'`r . =` The site is surrounded on the west, south and east by residential housing and fronts on Tamiami Trail east. A review of the sites physical and functional attributes reveals that it is one of the largest vacant parcels with adequate functional utility to accommodate several types of commercial uses. These attributes were taken into consideration when selecting the primary trade area for commercial uses. The primary market area used for this ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 5 analysis was developed utilizing guidelines from the Urban Land Use Institute) based on the proposed volume of retail space. The primary market area is community serving in nature which is generally identified as a 15 minute drive time surrounding the site. Due to the sites larger size and it being one of the remaining sites of adequate functional utility to accommodate a wide array of commercial uses, we also included the City of Marco Island. The City of Marco has no sites large enough to accommodate a big box retailer or larger community center; therefore this market would be potential demand. In studies of this nature, we estimate the market capture for each drive time increment based on the premise that consumers will travel to sites more convenient than drive further to get to the same type of retail use. For this site, we prepared four net need calculations, based on the incremental need for a 5 minute drive time, the need between 5 and 10 minutes, the need between 10 and 15 minutes and a separate net need for Marco Island. Once the incremental net need calculation is complete, we apply a market capture rate for each increment to estimate the overall net need for the site community retail uses based on the tiered demand and supply. Located below is a map showing each drive time increment and the Marco Island area. 1 Beyard, Michael D.,W. Paul O'Mara, et al. Shopping Center Development Handbook. Third Edition. Washington, D.C.: ULI-the Urban Land Institute, 1999. p.11 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 6 Day Primary Trade Area t Y. c iX a _ _ Gotde. ... Gar 1•aau(al L F.:;Ai MO»,4..41 East Naples apt es:. sai4(•4444* t-t ;a• RaMrnaka 3tzc.-ark F-• Naples Maur I 'a r y �\ 'L1 Legend Goodl 5MinDrivetime NewlOMinDrive -Newl5MinDrive -NewMarco Sub ectS ite - r_Stances.Esri,HERE.CeLCrme,USES,Intamap,inaerrent F Cap.,NP.CAti. Esri Japan.Melt:Esti China;Hong Kang),Ear ;Madam).TcrrT m, -• -tdspmylndia, 6pertStreetlaap crtrihutas,and the CIS User Community • Estimates of existing and projected households and population for each drive time are provided for years 2014, 2019, 2025 and 2030 in Table 2. The population figures for the market area were obtained by ESRI Business Analyst and were used to derive households. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 7 1.4 Analysis Process Determining the need for additional retail land is a four-step process, as outlined below. • Inventory current existing and vacant supply of commercial space in the market area; • Inventory parcels identified as potential commercial by the Collier County Future Land Use Map (FLUM); • Project future population/households to determine future commercial land needs and compare against commercial land allocation ratios; • Determine impact of amendment on land allocation ratio within the primary market area 2.0 The Supply of Commercial Space 2.1 Project Primary Market The analysis begins with the existing supply of commercial space in the primary market area. The primary market is community serving in nature as defined by the Urban Land Use Institute. For the purpose of this analysis we selected sites with more than 10 acres that had more than 100,000 sqft of leasable space. Each existing site included out parcels that had primary access from the larger parcel. Table 1 provides the current inventory of community-serving commercial space based on the distance from the site with attribute data obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser's ('PA') data. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 8 Table 1. Current Community-Service Inventory YEAR Dist Map ID PIN Center Name SITE ADDRESS SQFT HTD BUILT 5.00 1 81076000040 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP 6650 COLLIER BLVD 201,783 2007 5.00 3 34520001005 FREEDOM SQUARE 12713 TAMIAMI TRL E 233,255 1994 5.00 4 00732840004 CORAL ISLE FACTORY SHOPS LTD 6060 COLLIER BLVD 148,656 1991 5.00 6 25368002589 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC 12730 TAMIAMI TRL E 223,755 2010 5.00 Total 807,449 10.00 7 61834840006 GULF GATE PLAZA 2900 TAMIAMI TRL E 208,208 1969 10.00 8 00390080002 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP 3451 TAMIAMI TRL E 126,837 1993 10.00 9 28750000028 COURTHOUSE SHADOWS 3390 TAMIAMI TRL E 117,040 1987 10.00 11 00391600009 TOWN CENTER 3903 TAMIAMI TRL E 289,673 1987 10.00 13 00390680004 HOME DEPOT USA INC 1663 AIRPORT RD S 110,800 2000 10.00 Total 852,558 15.00 2 59712000488 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP 9885 COLLIER BLVD 203,652 2004 15.00 10 23945007103 BERKSHIRE COMMONS 7301 RADIO RD 132,912 1991 15.00 Total 336,564 Marco Island 12 56930960002 MARCO CENTER 1089 COLLIER BLVD N 110,596 1998 Grand Total 2,107,167 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser The thirteen properties above have are within the 100,000 sqft minimum threshold and are consider competing supply to the potential uses on the site. These sites include the assembled large parcels that are improved with community serving retail uses, as well as the out parcels that are directly access from the larger improvement. Vacant sites with the potential for commercial development The next step in this analysis is to identify parcels within the market area that have similar functional utility to the subject site in order to estimate the potential commercial -- square footage that could be built on those sites. Located below we identified twelve sites that fall with the following parameters that could provide competing commercial space; • 10 Acres or more, and • Have frontage and access on a major roadway, and • Are currently classified as Vacant Commercial Land Use per the Collier County Property Appraiser, and /or • Are located within a FLU category that allows commercial development. Located below is a list of potential sites that have adequate functional utility and could be developed with commercial uses. These sites are also segregated by their location from the subject site. This is followed by a map showing the existing competing center and the potential development sites with a map reference. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 9 Table 2. Potential Community-Service Inventory Remaining �..,, Dist Map ID OWNER NAME PUD Name LAND USE CODE Appr SQFT 5 1 KRG 951 &41 Ilc Tamiami Crossings Vacant Commercial 245,000 5 11 COLLIER LAND DEVELOPMENT INC Sable Bay Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural 146,876 5 14 NEW COMMUNITIES Lely Resort PUD 158,859 Total 5 Minute 550,735 10 15 NEW COMMUNITIES Hacienda Lakes PUD 327,000 Total 10 Minute 327,000 15 2 BC NAPLES INVESTMENTS LLP East Gateway Vacant Commercial 200,000 15 3 NEW HOPE MINSTRIES New Hope Minitries Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural 76,373 15 4 BENDERSON TR,RONALD 1-75 Alligator Alley PUD Vacant Commercial 258,249 15 5 VICTORIA ESTATES LTD ET AL Golden Gate Commerce Park Vacant Commercial 270,000 15 6 1-75 ASSOCIATES LLC Collier Blvd Mixed Use Vacant Commercial 270,000 15 7 DAVIS CROSSINGS VIII LLC ET AL 1-75 Collier Blvd Commerical Vacant Commercial 83,000 15 8 HIGHLAND PROP OF LEE&COLLIER Taormina Reserve Acreage Not Zoned Agricultural 262,000 15 9 STROHL FAMILY LLC Shopps at Santa Barbara Vacant Commercial 146,785 15 10 FFT SANTA BARBARA II LLC Freestate Vacant Commercial 134,427 15 12 ABERCIA,RALPH Forest Glen Vacant Commercial 100,000 15 13 NEW COMMUNITIES Fiddlers Creek PUD 300,000 Total 15 Minute 2,100,834 Total 2,978,569 The sites above are PUD's that include commercially approved square footage that would compete with the subject site. New Communities that are currently selling developer product are also included on this list. Fiddler's Creek and Hacienda Lakes have sites designated for commercial development in front of their communities. Lely Resort's square footage reflects the remaining approved for public use. Additional commercial square footage in Lely is approved, however it is reserved for community owner's only and is not available for public access. These sites would include the Players Club and the Ole' Town center within the Lely Resort DRI. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 10 Napies Primary Trade Area 5 -- Golden date 9 r r. r 5 yN g k 2 4 i : ,1 .r ke 10 'ax+a�raa nsluraa�_ r...., ` 12 r 2 Haase, 1.." 9 8 F+, I.A.1 T m.r, III Let treptes Manor p E2 �� a ,,ae Y4 ' © r .ein Legend SMinDrivetime gl \\NIN -New 10MinDrive NewlSMinDrive -PJewMarco FnalRetailProjectswOutPar 9� Mill a, VacantCommSites72714 ED SubjectSite Sources ri,HERE,CeLerme,USES, map,increment P Ccrp.,HRGRN; Esri Fan,h4ETl,Esri China(Hcng Kai97 . Thailantl),TcmTem, mylndia, OperStreett:tap cnliihutas,anGIS User Community ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 11 Prade Area .r LJ"LJI o© 4 T *9x , i1`r! .1.. ,*�4 is ■ 12 t. N.1r s., Ir.i4Ca Legend Gandi and 5MinDrivetime NewlOMinDrive Newl5MinDrive rr } ;, ; / ■New Marco FinalRetailProjectswOutPar !I flee. VacantCommSites72714 K}y I-1 SubjectSite scurces:Esri.HERE,cetcrme.uses.Intarmap,inter ent F Ccip.,NRCa.r., Esridapan,METI.Esri China tHeng Kong),Esri;Thailand).TcmTcm. M9Ymyindia,S OperrStreetblais-mri itutas,and the GIS User Community ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 12 The twelve existing centers have a combined total of 2,107,167 square feet of leasable space with 807,449 sqft located within 5 minutes, 852,558 sqft located between the 5 and 10 minute area, 336,564 sqft between the 10 and 15 minute area — and 110,596 sqft on Marco Island. The fifteen vacant sites located in PUD's that have approved commercial square footage have a combined total of 2,978,569 sqft within the trade area. Within the 5 minute area there is a total of 550,735 sqft, between 5 and 10 minutes there are 327,000 sqft and between 10 and 15 minutes there are a total of 2,100,834 sqft. The large percentage of potential commercial square footage in the area between 10 and 15 minutes be due to the concentration of vacant commercial land surrounding the 1-75 and Collier Blvd interchange. The sum of the existing commercial square footage from Table 1 and the approved commercial square footage in the PUD's in Table 2 reflect the total square feet supply potential in the trade area. Located below is a summary of these retail supply categories. Table 3. Total Existing and Vacant Zoned Commercial segregated by Drive Time Market Area SQFT Pct of Total 5 Minute Existing 807,449 59% 5 Minute Potential 550,735 41% 5 Minute Total 1,358,184 10 Minute Existing 852,558 72% 10 Minute Potential 327,000 28% 10 Minute Total 1,179,558 15 Minute Existing 336,564 14% 15 Minute Potential 2,100,834 86% 15 Minute Total 2,437,398 Marco Island Existing 110,596 100% Marco Island Potential - Marco Island Total 110,596 This subtotal reflects the existing square footage of commercial space and the potential for new commercial space based the approved square footage in the active PUD. Located below is the summary of both the existing and potential for each market area in the study. Table 4. Market Area totals Status SQFT HTD Existing 2,107,167 Vacant Zoned Comm 2,978,569 Sub Total 5,085,736 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 13 3.0 Proposed Amendment Impact on the Supply If the proposed Project is approved, it could add 250,000 square feet to the inventory of commercial-retail land to the market area community-serving retail market. 4.0 Analysis of the Need for the Proposed Amendment to the Market 4.1 Overview As noted above, the need for amending the adopted Plan revolves around whether or not the market contains enough commercial land to provide a sufficient degree of flexibility to accommodate the future projected level of demand for commercial retail space. It must be demonstrated that the amount of land allocated in the market to community retail uses does not provide this level of flexibility in satisfying future demand. For this study, the supply of land with existing commercial retail development, the supply of vacant commercial designated land, and the supply of suitable lands designated by the Collier County FLUM as having the potential to be commercial were compared to the demand for community serving commercial retail land as generated by projected population/household growth in the market area. For this study we are using a market capture method to estimate the overall net need -- for the subject market area. In order to do this, we prepared market area population forecast and demand for commercial square footage forecast for each of the four drive time markets. Each drive time market area was analyzed independently in order to derive a net need for the primary market area in total. Located below are the results of each drive time analysis. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 14 4.2 Demand for Commercial Space in the Project's Market Area and the Allocation Ratio In order to estimate the demand for commercial service, we need to estimate the population for the market area. This population estimate is based on data obtained from ESRI and is supplemented by the housing unit count from the Collier County Property Appraiser's data for July 2014. The Consultant also used an allocation factor in determining the demand for commercial retail space in the market area. The appropriate factor depends on a number of issues including the nature and speed of development in the market area, as well as the degree to which population forecasts are subject to error. The former Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") endorsed a factor of 1.25 for these kinds of analyses. While the appropriate level for the allocation ratio was still subject to debate at time DCA was dismantled, the Consultant has applied a factor of 1.25 in this study in order to remain conservative. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage or demand required in relation to the directly utilized acreage or demand to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land. The additional acreage or demand is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands will not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon, or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that _. will actually be used or developed. 5 Minute Drive time Table 5. Market Area Population Forecast 5 Minute TA 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 Trade Area Population 14,169 14,896 20,495 23,151 24,571 TA HH Size 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.84 TA HHs 4,988 5,288 7,215 8,150 8,650 TA Avg HH Income $59,610 $67,092 $88,237 $107,354 $130,613 Source: ESRI Table 6. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for 5 Minute TA 5 Minute Drive 2014 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 239,989 430,646 591,845 764,246 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio(sqft) 299,986 538,307 739,806 955,307 Vacant Supply (sqft) 0 100000 200000 550,735 Existing Supply (sqft) 807449 807449 807449 807449 Net Need(sqft) (507,463) (369,142) (267,643) (402,877) ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 15 Between 5 and 10 Minute trade area Table 7. Market Area Population Forecast 10 Minute TA 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 Trade Area Population 29,611 30,830 36,205 39,418 42,233 TA HH Size 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 TA HHs 13,188 13,772 16,125 18,250 20,254 TA Avg HH Income $62,801 $70,683 $84,399 $97,842 $113,426 Source: ESRI Table 8. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for 10 Minute TA Between 5 and 10 Min Drive 2014 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 658,482 920,597 1,207,866 1,554,007 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio(sqft) 823,102 1,150,747 1,509,833 1,942,509 Vacant Supply (sqft) 0 100000 200000 327,000 EAsting Supply (sqft) 852558 852558 852558 852558 Net Need (sqft) (29,456) 198,189 457,275 762,951 Between 10 and 15 Minute Trade area Table 9. Market Area Population Forecast 15 Minute TA 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 _ Trade Area Population 49,418 50,634 60,701 66,087 70,808 TA HH Size 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 TA HHs 20,002 22,544 24,569 26,457 28,450 TA Avg HH Income $64,408 $72,492 $86,559 $100,346 $116,328 Source: ESRI Table 10. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for 15 Minute TA Between 10 and 15 Min Drive 2014 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 1,105,480 1,438,569 1,795,849 2,238,709 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio (sqft) 1,381,850 1,798,211 2,244,812 2,798,387 Vacant Supply (sqft) - 250,000 500,000 2,100,834 Existing Supply (sqft) 336,564 336,564 336,564 336,564 Net Need (sqft) 1,045,286 1,211,647 1,408,248 360,989 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 16 Marco Island Drive time Table 11. Market Area Population Forecast Marco TA 2010 2014 2019 2025 2030 Trade Area Population 18,599 18,930 22,330 24,986 27,757 TA HH Size 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 TA HHs 9,371 9,578 11,251 12,589 13,985 TA Avg HH Income $102,222 $115,052 $137,378 $159,259 $184,624 Source: ESRI Table 12. Demand for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. for Marco TA Marco Island 2014 2019 2025 2030 Community Retail Demand (sqft) 745,417 1,045,536 1,356,204 1,746,556 Market Factor-Allocation Ratio 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 Retail Demand w/Allocation Ratio(sqft) 931,771 1,306,920 1,695,255 2,183,195 Vacant Supply (sqft) - - - Existing Supply (sqft) 110,596 110,596 110,596 110,596 Net Need (sqft) 821,175 1,196,324 1,584,659 2,072,599 The information above is the basis for estimating the market demand for community retail uses within the 5 minute drive time area and between 5 and 10 minutes, 10 and 15 minutes and Marco Island. This forecast information indicates that the market's demand for commercial space will increase in relation the population within each drive time area. The data from ESRI does not accurately forecast the number of housing units in an area of rapid growth life the trade area. In these cases we supplemented the ESRI households with an estimate of finished units in the newly developing communities. The 5 minute trade area household count was increased by 1,500 units in 2020 to account for the addition of 500 households in Treviso Bay and 1,000 households in Isles of Collier Preserve. By 2025, it is anticipated that Treviso Bay will be built out, however the Isles at Collier Preserve, will still be marketing. Using the same absorption rate, we increased the 2025 households by 600, which would account for the remaining units in Isles of Collier Preserve. The 10 minute trade area household count was increased by 1,000 units in 2020, 760 in 2025 to account for the addition of new units within Hacienda Lakes. This community has approval for the development of 1,760 homes of which we are accounting for the build out within our forecast window. Naples Reserve also falls into the 10 minute drive time. This community is approve for 1,157 units and marketing is expected to commence in 2015. In order to account for these units,we increased the 2020 household count by 750 and the 2025 household count by the remaining 407 units. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 17 The Consultant has developed a retail demand model to project the demand for retail space based on the number of households and their income and demographic characteristics within each of the drive time areas. The documentation for the model is rather voluminous. This methodology is reproduced here in Appendix A2. Growth management practices suggest that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the commercial allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developing area and the area's general exposure to growth trends in the market. Table 13 summaries the market capture from each of the trade area commercial net need calculations presented above.The market capture percentages are reflective of the portion of the market that this sites retail uses could reasonable expect to capture. Depending of the type of use of tenant at the site, these capture rates will vary. Located below is our estimate of market capture for each drive time trade area. Table 13. Net Need Market Capture for Community Commercial Sq. Ft. Distance Market Capture 2014 2019 2025 2030 5 Minute Drive 50% (253,732) (184,571) (133,821) (201,438) 10 Minute Drive 20% (5,891) 39,638 91,455 152,590 15 Minute Drive 10% 104,529 121,165 140,825 36,099 Marco Island 20% 164,235 239,265 316,932 414,520 Total 9,141 215,496 415,390 401,771 We assume that 50% of the 5 minute trade area will visit the sites retail uses. This is based on the fact the most convenient retail uses will capture the largest share of the market.The site is estimated to capture 20% of the 10 minute trade area due to easy access and visibility on US 41. The low market capture rate for the 15 minute trade is reflective of the abundance of vacant commercial land surrounding the 1-75 interchange and the amount of alternative centers in the trade area. As noted in the 15 minute net need analysis, over 2,100,000 square feet of vacant commercial land is potential competition to the subject site, however, over 1,100,000 square feet is located at the 1-75 interchange and is significantly influenced by interstate drive by traffic. Because of these factors, we limited to the market capture for this area to 10 percent. Marco Island is outside the normal 15 minute drive time, however due to its limited land for new commercial development and its access near the subject site, it is included in our analysis. I estimated the market capture of Marco Island to be 20%, which accounts for the current net need estimated from our analysis. The growth of the island and its lack of available sites for community serving retail uses currently pushes the demand off the island and into our general trade area. The future growth of the island will result in the more visits to the 5 minute trade area surrounding the subject site. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 18 As shown by Table 13, using the market capture estimated for each drive time and Marco Island, the net need in the horizon year of 2030 is estimated at 401,771 sqft of community based retail. Based on this analysis, there is a clear and compelling case for adding additional land with community-serving commercial use to this market. The demand for additional square footage in this market exceeds the potential for the subjects 31 +/- acre site. 5.0 Conclusions Taking into account all developed, vacant and potential commercial land in the market; there are currently insufficient lands designated for commercial uses to provide a reasonable degree of market flexibility in accommodating community serving retail uses within the primary market area. Demand from households east of the market area in Goodland, Port of the Isles and Everglades City, further add to this need. This subject site is designed to serve community demand for commercial space and is the only site of adequate functional utility to allow for flexible development. The location provides the access and visibility that is required for this type of development. The under-allocation of suitable commercial property supports the need for this additional commercial acreage. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc.All Rights Reserved. 19 APPENDIX A 1 Retail Demand Methodology 1.0 Methodology The methodology employed in the analysis of the demand for retail space at this site is based on a consumer expenditures model. This model can estimate the aggregate market demand for retail space, the demand for retail space at a specific location, and the effective supply of competing retailers in the area. The net demand for retail space at the location being studied is determined as the difference between the site demand and the effective supply of competition. 2.0 Aggregate Market - Retail Demand MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc. utilized a model to determine retail demand. This model estimates retail demand by square footage, shopping center type and store type. These sources are census based (ESRI) local area households and household income data, consumer expenditure profiles from the U.S. Department of Labor Consumer Expenditure Survey, Department of Revenue Gross Sales data, and Urban Land Institute shopping center tenant profiles, square footage requirements and average sales per square foot by store type from the publication Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers. The model operates by first determining retail household expenditures for market area households. Expenditures are determined through application of the results of the Consumer Expenditure Survey, conducted by the U.S. Department of Labor. This survey of over 30,000 households nationwide provides detailed information on average dollar expenditure amounts and the expenditure percent of household income, for all household expenditures. The income expenditure percentages are applied to the average local area household income and multiplied by the number of households to determine market area spending potential for retail store goods. Next, the historic Department of Revenue (DOR) Sales data (for the county in question) is indexed by tenant classification 2, from the Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers. The expected expenditures on retail goods are then applied to this county specific (DOR) index to determine an estimate of spending by major store type (tenant classification). The determination of sales by retail center (neighborhood, community, regional, super-regional) is determined through the construction of an index of surveyed sales by center type (also located in the Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers). 2 Tenant Classification are: general merchandise, food, food service, clothing and accessories, shoes, home furnishings, home appliances/music, building materials and hardware, automotive, hobby/special interest, gifts/specialty,jewelry, liquor, drugs, other retail, personal services, entertainment/community. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 20 Supportable square feet of a retail center is determined by applying the average sales per square foot of GLA, found in Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, to the expected sales by store type (tenant classification). In addition to determining the supportable square feet -- of retail space, MJT Realty Economic Advisors has determined the expected sales by DOR retail classification, which is a subset of the individual store types (tenant classifications). Provided below are income and expenditure data used in the analysis for each of the four trade areas in this report. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 21 5 Minute Drive Time Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail.for Year HHs AVG HH Income Income N Retail 2014 5,288 $67,092 $354,780,276 36.50% $129,480,164 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;U.S Census;Collier Comprensive Planning Dept.;Bureau of Labor Statistics Source:Fishkind&Associates,Inc;U.S.Census Bureau;Bureau of Labor Statistics Source:Fishkind&Associates,Inc;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008-Urban Land Institute DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) f%l Allocation 2014 Expenditures l$) GENERAL MERCHANDISE 14.48% $18,743,999 FOOD 15.27% $19,765,409 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% $13,892,760 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES 4.48% $5,797,860 SHOES 0.37% $484,276 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% $9,194,939 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC 3.67% $4,756,492 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDW 11.73% $15,188,530 AUTOMOTIVE 23.35% $30,233,996 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL GIFT/SPECIALTY 1.86% $2,413,209 JEWLERY 0.56% $730,220 LIQUOR WITH FOOD SERVICE WITH FOOD SERVICE DRUGS 0.87% $1,123,621 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $1,860,016 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $895,891 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $4,398,948 TOTAL $129,480,164 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.:Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT—COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED$/SF SQFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 7,999 FOOD $350.38 34,825 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 20,865 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES $232.68 2,516 SHOES $192.73 294 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 18,567 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC $302.20 3,561 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 36,959 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 88,423 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 3,931 JEWLERY $288.20 81 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 1,289 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 1,820 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 2,181 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 16,679 TOTAL 239,989 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 22 Between 5 and 10 Minute Drive Time Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail.for Year HHs AVG HH Income Income % Retail 2014 13,772 $70,683 $973,447,361 36.50% $355,268,127 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc.;US Census,Collier Comprehensive Planning,Bureau of Labor. DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) J%I Allocation 2014 Expenditures t$) GENERAL MERCHANDISE 14.48% $51,429,849 FOOD 15.27% $54,232,398 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% $38,119,002 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES 4.48% $15,908,189 SHOES 0.37% $1,328,757 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% $25,229,107 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC 3.67% $13,050,879 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWAR, 11.73% $41,674,342 AUTOMOTIVE 23.35% $82,956,143 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL GIFT/SPECIALTY 1.86% $6,621,372 JEWLERY 0.56% $2,003,580 LIQUOR WITH FOOD SERVICE WITH FOOD SERVICE DRUGS 0.87% $3,082,995 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $5,103,518 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $2,458,148 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $12,069,848 TOTAL $355,268,127 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT-COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED$/SF SQFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 21,948 FOOD $350.38 95,553 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 57,249 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES $232.68 6,903 SHOES $192.73 807 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 50,944 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC $302.20 9,770 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 101,409 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 242,616 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 10,785 JEWLERY $288.20 221 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 3,536 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 4,993 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 5,983 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 45,764 TOTAL 658,482 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 23 Between 10 and15 Minute Drive Time Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail.for Year HHs AVG HH Income Income % Retail 2014 22,544 $72,492 $1,634,254,495 36.50% $596,435,469 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;US Census,Collier Comprehensive Planning,Bureau of Labor. DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) I%)Allocation 2014 Expenditures IS) GENERAL MERCHANDISE 14.48% $86,342,072 FOOD 15.27% $91,047,081 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% $63,995,398 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES 4.48% $26,707,175 SHOES 0.37% $2,230,760 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% $42,355,429 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC 3.67% $21,910,232 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE 11.73% $69,964,215 AUTOMOTIVE 23.35% $139,269,420 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL GIFT/SPECIALTY 1.86% $11,116,171 JEWLERY 0.56% $3,363,674 LIQUOR WITH FOOD SERVICE WITH FOOD SERVICE DRUGS 0.87% $5,175,831 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $8,567,948 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $4,126,818 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $20,263,245 TOTAL $596,435,469 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT-COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED$/SF SQFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 36,848 FOOD $350.38 160,417 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 96,112 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES $232.68 11,589 SHOES $192.73 1,355 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 85,526 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC $302.20 16,401 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 170,249 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 407,311 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 - 18,107 JEWLERY $288.20 372 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 5,936 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 8,383 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 10,044 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 76,831 TOTAL 1,105,480 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 24 Marco Island Total Market Income Exp. Income Avail.for Year HHs AVG HH Income Income % Retail 2014 9,578 $115,052 $1,101,965,772 36.50% $402,172,045 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;US Census,Collier Comprehensive Planning,Bureau of Labor. DISTRIBUTIONS BY STORE TYPE (ALL CENTER TYPES) 1%)Allocation 2014 Expenditures($1 GENERAL MERCHANDISE 14.48% $58,219,823 FOOD 15.27% $61,392,376 FOOD SERVICE 10.73% $43,151,626 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES 4.48% $18,008,451 SHOES 0.37% $1,504,185 HOME FURNISHINGS 7.10% $28,559,954 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC 3.67% $14,773,908 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE 11.73% $47,176,355 AUTOMOTIVE 23.35% $93,908,344 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL WITH HOBBY/SPECIAL GIFT/SPECIALTY 1.86% $7,495,552 JEWLERY 0.56% $2,268,101 LIQUOR WITH FOOD SERVICE WITH FOOD SERVICE DRUGS 0.87% $3,490,025 OTHER RETAIL 1.44% $5,777,304 PERSONAL SERVICERS 0.69% $2,782,683 ENTERTAINMENT 3.40% $13,663,357 TOTAL $402,172,045 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors, Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. MEDIAN SALES PER SQFT-COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY 2014 COMMUNITY MED$/SF SQFT SUPPORTABILITY GENERAL MERCHANDISE $149.50 24,846 FOOD $350.38 108,168 FOOD SERVICE $298.41 64,807 CLOTHING&ACCESSORIES $232.68 7,814 SHOES $192.73 914 HOME FURNISHINGS $209.28 57,670 HOME APPLIANCES/MUSIC $302.20 11,059 BUILDING MATERIALS/HARDWARE $388.65 114,798 AUTOMOTIVE $237.92 274,647 HOBBY/SPECIAL INTEREST $208.86 GIFT/SPECIALTY $170.42 12,209 JEWLERY $288.20 251 LIQUOR $376.46 DRUGS $429.07 4,003 OTHER RETAIL $247.53 5,653 PERSONAL SERVICERS $176.87 6,773 ENTERTAINMENT $76.61 51,806 TOTAL 745,417 Source:MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.;Florida Department of Revenue;Dollars&Cents of Shopping Centers,2008- Urban Land Institute. ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 25 APPENDIX A 2 Collier County Future Land Use Map R 25 E . R 211 E R 27 E I R 21 E I R 21 5 R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E II 39 E R 34 E _..... ___ 2012-2025 41.441 Ot•IGIKA TWA ....s*.mo -- FUTURE LAND USE MAP - - ., 111 If IMMO WS11214.10q, Collier County Florida — 0 '-f41.`4,172..4, . I.:,eousavanos,MIGNATIO• : O.TIC nrrung vor memo T111413: •Z.::::::Vid.:=-.. NEW.Vt•TWES . TOILER COUNIV OM.•/.00.M1TURAI. 0■....=1,1t,..,,...... .J ,-- .......,......,, I •::::;',.t!.:,1,-,L,„,.., ' , I\ -''' •-- i .:--,-'f"TV.4."-' ci ..r.'..:1Z.3.!...... --- ii.......,... . • -:.!•.:--z ,,,,-..,. rj,..•,1.:N.-..tr.9.-:..... .......... ..... •t..^.....‘. - 44..AYNN '.; - ., 1 .......-.......-.....,.., :-............................ .." . •.4:"---.:;:::::'4,'...-...:,..' fa 7...7.7X7,7":-.. , \ I •.1-21'.17--?..Z.`4.-I.,,...:. •...---.-r.1:Z.:.•;;:7,--.-, iII...........77I'''''"' 4. CI... ...'"..." , 1Z:."1".r.:":='-.:::::::-.'-`zt:=::`-•?:-...r.:-..7-`t..-=',.-,.-—, . . 1 _i ...,4 : 1 I 44..4 I.:._,---....„ -....!•...▪!!! 1.. .■le' ; I " 1 . 1 '1 .1.I.■111.0.7E 1 , . ..,,,, .,,......,_ -- ....,:- 1: ' . 'AT., t.,•,...., I „,.,VM.---,„,. _ 1 I s; 7' . - ' .. -r' ,----:::::: - -- i.....r.f°"" i 1 .--..-j -------.... ! I ,......., ,• 1 ,w: -I, .••. • , -"----:=:.."-=---•-----::;:= I 4,C.F., "T I'''.... I PGIrSVIA `,.. N ....... t...- ..;...t ''.''',"7, - -..,'' . ...Ka...4v, e..■ . - •f,..V.''' r-III,'...'•,'%--1.-i-I,I-. IJ"...-7:— '77--,,,,r_______ , I • 'zt_.1,:-,-,_-fi.,,.-- - ',:::::::•"4"-:-.'17•1::a--- ; --•:: .....A,k••=y.,'- N. . J 1251 I 4211 R 27 E I 1211 11 29 E 1 30 E 5315 1 32 E , 1 33 E 1 34 E ...... .... ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 26 APPENDIX A 3 ESRI Demographic Summary • l esn- Demographic and Income Profile vincentian 248 Benson 5t,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:5 minute radius - Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 Population 14,169 14,896 16,021 Households 4,988 5,288 5,746 Families 3.569 3,758 4,055 Average Household Size 2.82 2.80 2.77 Owner Occupied Housing Units 3,723 3,738 4,035 Renter Occupied Housing Units 1,265 1,549 1,711 Median Age 39.6 41.7 44.2 Trends•.2014-2019 Annual Rate Area State National Population 1.47% 1.06% 0.73% Households 1.68% 1.06% 0.75% Families 1.53% 0.95% 0.66% Owner HHs 1.54% 0.93% 0.69% Median Household Income 3.86% 3.16% 2.74% 2014 2019 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 685 13.0% 680 11.8% $15,000-$24,999 809 15.3% 622 10.8% $25,000-$34,999 819 15.5% 700 12.2% $35,000-€49,999 875 16.5% 983 17.1% $50,000-$74,999 846 16.0% 1,083 18.8% $75,000-$99,999 526 9.9% 703 12.2% $100,000-$149,999 404 7.6% 497 8.6% $150,000-$199,999 152 2.9% 232 4.0% $200,000+ 171 3.2% 246 4.3% Median Household Income $39,486 $47,725 Average Household Income $59,610 669,555 Per Capita Income $21,285 $25,123 Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 992 7.0% 990 6.6% 1,032 6.4% 5-9 1,028 7.3% 1,015 6.8% 1,033 6.4% 10-14 926 6.5% 941 6.3% 963 6.0% 15-19 989 7.0% 868 5.8% 863 5.5% 20-24 745 5.3% 855 5.7% 734 4.6% 25-34 1,650 11.6% 1,694 11.4% 1,805 11.3% 35-44 1,690 11.9% 1,618 10.9% 1,690 10.5% 45-54 1,619 11.4% 1,663 11.2% 1,655 10.3% 55-64 1,544 10.9% 1,817 12.2% 2,121 13.2% 65-74 1,708 12.1% 1,983 13.3% 2,405 15.0% 75-84 1,001 7.1% 1,121 7.5% 1,316 8.2% 85+ 276 1.9% 328 2.2% 382 2.4% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 9,885 69.8% 10,207 68,5% 10,729 67.0% Black Alone 2,215 15.6% 2,470 16.6% 2,865 17.9% American Indian Alone 76 0.5% 80 0.5% 89 0.6% Asian Alone 89 0.6% 111 0.7% 145 0.9% Pacific Islander Alone 5 0.0% 6 O.0°k 7 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 1,559 11.0% 1,660 11.1% 1,797 11.2% Two or More Races 339 2.4% 362 2,4% 390 2.4% Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 6,023 42.5% 6,307 42.3% 6,665 42.9% Data Note:income is expressod in currenL dopers_ source:0,S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary file I, Esd forecasts for 2014 and 2019. • July 30,2014 r, ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 27 *'" esri. Demographic and Income Profile ___, ,v3.....,1 �- Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:5 minute radius - - -- Trends 2014-2019 3.5- 0 3- c 2.5- c_ v 2- 2 1.5- o 1_ Area c :State Q 0.5- USA 0 Population Households Families Owner HHS Median HH Income Population by Age 14- 12- 10- u 8- a 6 •2014 - --� 2019 2 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ _ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race 515K-524K :33501 15.396 325K-534K --.15.5% 1515K 13.0%$35K-549K 3.2% 216.6% 5150K-5199K 22.9% §1007.-$149K 17.6% 1950K-974K 575K-$99K _ 16.0% 9.9% 0 White Black Am.Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:42.3% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File I. Esri Forecasts Tor 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 28 .......... . i Demographic and Income Profile Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:10 minute radius Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 43,780 45,726 48,797 Households 18,176 19,060 20,488 Families 11,596 12,095 12,942 Average Household Size 2.32 2.32 2.31 Owner Occupied Housing Units 12,935 12,852 13,730 Renter Occupied Housing Units 5,241 6,208 6,757 Median Age 47.7 50.0 52.3 Trends:2014-2019 Annual Rate Area State National 1.31% 1.06% 0.73% Population 1.06°/c 0.75% Households s 1.46% Families 1.36% 0.95% 0.66% Owner HHs 1.33% 0.93% 0.69% Median Household Income 3.90% 3.16% 2.74!. 2014 2019 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <515.000 2,286 12.0% 2,223 10.9% $15,000-$24,999 2,912 15.3°/c 2,237 10.9% $25,000-$34,999 2,672 14.0% 2,295 11.2% $35,000-$49,999 3,160 16.6% 3,403 16.6% $50,000-$74,999 3,125 16.4% 3,816 18.6% $75,000-599,999 2,023 10.6% 2,702 13.2% 5100,000-5149,999 1,606 8.4% 1,999 9.8% $150,000-$199,999 527 2.8% 785 3.8% 5200,000+ 749 3.9°!° 1,027 5.0% Median Household Income $41,593 550,367 Average Household Income $62,801 573,730 Per Capita Income $26,477 $31,121 Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent �r 0-4 2,383 5.4% 2,343 5.1% 2,423 5.0% 5-9 2,266 5.2% 2,337 5.1% 2,369 4.9% 10-14 2,023 4.6% 2,077 4.5% 2,234 4.6% 15-19 2,192 5.0% 2,020 4.4% 2,104 4.3% 20-24 2,212 5.1% 2,324 5.1% 2,111 4.3% 25-34 4,778 10.9% 4,851 10.6!° 4,927 10.1% 35-44 4,651 10.6% 4,543 9.9% 4,696 9.6% 45•54 5,039 11.5% 5,011 11.0% 4,883 10.0% 55-64 5,792 13.2% 6,235 13.6% 7,083 14.5% 65-74 6,608 15.1% 7,537 16.5% 8,755 17.9% 75-84 4,377 10.0% 4,673 10.2% 5,260 10.8% 85+ 1,461 3.3% 1,774 3.9% 1,954 4.0% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 34,664 79.2% 35,484 77.6% 36,882 75.6% Black Alone 4,626 10.6% 5,261 11.5% 6,264 12.8% American Indian Alone 191 0.4% 203 0.4% 225 0.5% Asian Alone 342 0.8% 427 0.9% 559 1.1% Pacific Islander Alone 15 0.0% 17 0.0% 19 0.0% Some Other Pace Alone 3,068 7.0% 3,369 7.4% 3,775 7.7% Two or More Races 874 2.0% 965 2.1% 1,074 2.2% Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 12,517 28.6% 13,495 29.5% 15,193 31.1% Data Note:income is expressed in(Lineal dollars. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Sunvcay Rle 1. Esn forecasts for 2014 and 2019. • • duly 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 29 ............ ,;.--. "`+`_.,,, esrib Demographic and Income Profile Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:10 minute radius Trends 2014-2019 .- 3.5- 0 c 3- ti: a 2.5- c w 2- 1.5- 1 •Area c • State a 0.5- USA 0 Population Households Families Owner HHS Median HH Income Population by Age 16- 14- 12- E 10- C''y 8- 6 4 • 2014 2- I` I3 , ; '. 2019 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race 515K-524K 70 525K-534K 15.3"% 14.0% 60 <515K 12.0% 50 $35K-849K y 16.6% L 40 d s2ooK+ 30 3.9% $150K-6199K 20 2.8% 5100K-5149K 10 0.4% 550K-574K 16.4% 575K-$99K o 10.6% White Black Am.Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:29.5% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 • ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 30 • ! esrr Demographic and Income Profile vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:15 minute radius Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 Population 93,198 96,360 102,213 Households 40,178 41,604 44,296 Families 25,514 26,209 27,718 Average Household Size 2.27 2.27 2.26 Owner Occupied Housing Units 27,931 27,289 28,927 Renter Occupied Housing Units 12,247 14,315 15,369 Median Age 48.4 50.3 52.0 Trends:2014-2019 Annual Rate Area State National Population 1.19% 1.06% 0.73% Households 1.26% 1.06% 0.75% Families 1.13% 0.95% 0.66% Owner HHs 1.17% 0.93% 0.69% Median Household Income 3.61% 3.16% 2.74% 2014 2019 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 4,552 10.9% 4,350 9.8% $15,000-$24,999 5,886 14.3% 4,417 10.0% $25,000-$34,999 5,618 13.5% 4,732 10.7% $35,000-$49,999 7,012 16.9% 7,380 16.7% $50,000-$74,999 7,256 17.4% 8,613 19.4% $75,000-$99,999 4,563 11.0% 6,039 13.7% $100,000-$149,999 3,914 9.4% 4,878 11.0% $150,000-$199,999 1,214 2.9% 1,736 3.9% $200,000+ 1,588 3.8% 2,101 4.7% Median Household Income $43,982 $52,525 Average Household Income $64,408 575,121 Per Capita Income $28,010 532,690 Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 5,011 5.4% 4,892 5.1% 5,069 5.0% 5-9 4,685 5.0% 4,970 5.2% 5,053 4.9°!0 10-14 4,258 4.6% 4,370 4.5% 4,861 4.8% 15-19 4,398 4.7% 4,113 4.3°1° 4,344 4.2% ,.'-.. 20-24 4,412 4.7% 4,506 4.7°l° 4,166 4.1% 25-34 10,008 10.7% 10,144 10.5% 10,202 10.0% 35-44 10,001 10.7% 9,765 10.10/u 10,087 9.9% 45-54 11,096 11.9% 10,949 11.4% 10,577 10.3% 55-64 12,625 13.5% 13,319 13.8% 14,875 14.6% 65-74 14,326 15.4% 15,678 16.3% 17,719 17.3% 75-84 9,443 10.1% 10,009 10.4% 11,148 10.9% 85+ 2,937 3.2% 3,643 3.8% 4,113 4.0% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Atone 76,432 82.0% 77,457 80.4% 80,125 78.4% Black Alone 8,525 9.1% 9,669 10.0% 11,488 11.2% American Indian Alone 357 0.4% 384 0.4% 433 0.4% Asian Atone 973 1.0% 1,201 1.2% 1,554 1.5°1° Pacific Islander Alone 34 0.0% 42 0.0% 49 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 5,100 5.5% 5,622 5.8°/, 6,334 6.2% Two or More Races 1,778 1.9% 1,985 2.1% 2,229 2.2% Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 23,935 25.7% 26,070 27.1% 29,708 29.1% Data Note:Income is erp,essed in cunen1 c&Aims. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary Rte 1. Esti forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 31 & ) esri Demographic and Income Profile __A._ Vincentian 248 Benson St,Naples,Florida,34113 Drive Time:15 minute radius Trends 2014-2019 3.5- c 3- a) u 93 2.5- a ` 2- 2 is 1.5- 3 1- i II ■Area c ■State Q 0.5 USA 0 Population Households Families Owner HHS Median HH Income Population by Age 16- 14- 12- t 10- y 8- a 6- 4_ . 2- I III 1" 2014 2019 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race so $255-134K $155-524K 13.5% 14.1% 70 60 <5155 535K-$49K - 10.9% i,, 50 16.9% N v 40 m 5200K+ 3.3% 30 6150K-5199K 2.9% 20 $100K-$149K 559K-574K 9.456 10 , 17.4% 575K•999K o — w 11.0% White Black Am.Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:27.1% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary Fie 1. Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ..---r ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 32 • ,, ) esrr Demographic and Income Profile Polygon Marco Island Area:49.84 square miles Summary Census 2010 2014 2019 Population 18,599 18,930 19,864 Households 9,371 9,578 10,077 Families 6,336 6,413 6,690 Average Household Size 1.98 1.98 1.97 Owner Occupied Housing Units 7,958 7,879 8,277 Renter Occupied Housing Units 1,413 1,699 1,800 Median Age 63.0 64.8 65.5 Trends:2014-2019 Annual Rate Area State National Population 0.97% 1.06% 0.73% Households 1.02% 1.06% 0.75% Families 0.85% 0.95% 0.66% Owner HHS 0.99% 0.93% 0.69% Median Household Income 3.32% 3.16% 2.74% 2014 2019 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 703 7.3% 609 6.0% $15,000-$24,999 776 8.1% 524 5.2% 525,000-$34,999 882 9.2% 667 6.6% $35,000-$49,999 1,134 11.8% 1,074 10.7% $50,000-$74,999 1,576 16.5% 1,701 16.9% $75,000-$99,999 1,183 12.4% 1,470 14.6% $100,000-$149,999 1,605 16.8% 1,872 18.6% $150,000-$199,999 644 6.7% 825 8.2% $200,000+ 1,074 11.2% 1,333 13.2% Median Household Income $69,081 $81,349 Average Household Income $102,222 $121,958 Per Capita Income $51,371 $61,455 Census 2010 2014 2019 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 393 2.1% 354 1.9% 374 1.9% 5-9 504 2.7% 478 2.5% 476 2.4% 10-14 546 2.9% 518 2.7% 528 2.7% 15-19 523 2.8% 472 2.5% 473 2.4% ��. 20-24 419 2.3% 402 2.1% 369 1.9% 25-34 880 4.7% 917 4.8% 888 4.5% 35-44 1,165 6.3% 1,080 5.7% 1,205 6.1% 45-54 2,176 11.7% 1,893 10.0% 1,648 8.3% 55-64 3,521 18.9% 3,423 18.1% 3,680 18.5% 65-74 4,819 25.9% 5,081 26.8% 5,359 27.0% 75-84 2,908 15.6% 3,341 17.7% 3,715 18.7% 85+ 747 4.0% 968 5.1% 1,146 5.8% Census 2010 2014 2019 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 17,733 95.3% 17,899 94.6% 18,583 93.6% Black Alone 184 1.0% 217 1.1% 271 1.4% American Indian Alone 24 0.1% 25 0.1% 30 0.2% Asian Alone 198 1.1% 250 1.3% 336 1.7% Pacific Islander Alone 6 0.0% 8 0.0% 11 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 325 1.7% 377 2.0% 452 2.3% Two or More Races 130 0.7% 154 0.8% 181 0.9% Hispanic Origin(Any Race) 1,375 7.4% 1,572 8.3°/a 1,917 9.7% Data Note:Income is expressed in current dollars. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary fife 1. Cut forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 33 �� �Sr� • '*M m Demographic and Income Profile Polygon Area:49.84 square miles Trends 2014-2019 3- c d 2.5- P. c 2- °/ 1.5- 18 cd a 1- •Area 3 Q 0.5 1 III State USA 0- Population Households Families Owner HHS Median HH Income Population by Age 2 5- 2 0- 1 5- • , ' II II I ' I! I- 2019 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2014 Household Income 2014 Population by Race 925K-£45K $25K-524K 90 11.8% 9.2% $15K-524K $� 8.1% 70 510K-$7490 16.5% <515K 60 7.3% C cOi 50 a 40 520090 30 11.2% 57590-$55K 20 12.4% £150K-51998 10 6.7% 5100K-$149K -� ®. 16.8% 0 White Black Am.Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2014 Percent Hispanic Origin:8.3% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary Rie 1. Esd forecasts for 2014 and 2019. July 30,2014 ©2014 MJT Realty Economic Advisors,Inc.All Rights Reserved. 34 EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED GMPA AMENDMENT LANGUAGE Insert on Page 10 of the Future Land Use Element: Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN- MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 8/4/2014 H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Exhibit A GMPA Amend Lang 8-4-2014.docx Insert on Page 26 of the Future Land Use Element: 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed-Use Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 8/4/2014 H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Exhibit A GMPA Amend Lang 8-4-2014.docx Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element: 17. Vincentian Mixed-Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, and is located on the south/west side of U.S. 41/Tamiami Trail East, as shown on the Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for a mixture of neighborhood or community commercial development; residential development; and other employment generating uses such as corporate headquarters. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and potentially allow for office uses that would provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In addition, the Subdistrict provides the alternative of residential or mixed use development. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The Subdistrict allows all those commercial uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, both by right and as conditional uses, with the exception of the prohibited uses, listed below. The following uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: 1. Pawn shops (5932), 2. Adult book stores, adult video rental or sales, or any other use that is defined as a "sexually oriented business" in the Collier County Code of Laws, 26-151 et seq., 3. Animal specialty services except veterinary(0752); except outside kenneling and dog grooming are permitted, 4. Automatic merchandising machine operators (5962), 5. Correctional institutions (9223), 6. Crematories (7261), 7. Farm product raw materials (5153-5159), 8. Fishing, commercial (0912-0919), 9. Fuel dealers (5983-5989), 10. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens, 11. Installation or erection of building equipment contractors (1796), 12. Local and suburban passenger transportation(4131-4173), 13. Marinas (4493 &4499) , 14. Motor vehicle dealers, used only(5521), 15. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified (7299), Coin operated service machine operations, Comfort station operation, Escort service, Locker rental, Massage parlors (except those employing licensed therapists), Rest room operation, Tattoo parlors, Turkish baths, Wedding chapels, privately operated, 16. Power laundries, family and commercial (7211), and Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 8/4/2014 H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Exhibit A GMPA Amend Lang 8-4-2014.docx 17. Transfer stations (4212). Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses will be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet, a hotel (max. FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility(max. FAR 0.6). 2. Residential will be limited to a maximum density of 11.74 units/acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the project, inclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 360 market-rate rental apartment dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use, including residential and commercial uses, the residential density limitation is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size, further limited to a maximum of 128,000 square feet of Neighborhood Commercial uses, a 150-room hotel, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. 4. Under any of the development scenarios above, the average weekday pm peak hour entering/exiting trip generation shall not exceed 1,107 total trips. 5. A single (one) automobile service station may be permitted anywhere within the Subdistrict. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility may be permitted. 6. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts, Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD, Planned Unit Development, which must contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted at the time of Site Development. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of Site Development will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross- access agreements. 4. If the subject site is developed with residential uses only, the project will provide a minimum of 60 percent open space. Otherwise, the minimum open space shall be 30 percent. 5. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 6. Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 8/4/2014 H:\2013\2013043\wP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Exhibit A GMPA Amend Lang 8-4-2014.docx 7. The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building height,but not less than 25 feet. 8. At the time of rezoning, the developer shall provide additional restrictions and standards necessary to insure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 9. At the time of Site Development, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off- site, except that remaining portions of preserve on-site shall be a minimum of one acre in size. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. 10. Any residential development shall be developed as a market-rate rental apartment project to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 8/4/2014 H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Exhibit A GMPA Amend Lang 8-4-2014.docx Insert on Page 141 of the Future Land Use Element: (VIII) Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map (XIV) Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map (XIV) Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map (I) Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (VI) Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map (VI) Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map (VI) Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (XIV) Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map (VI) Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (VI) Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map (XIX) Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict (XXI) Livingston Road/Veteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infi11 Subdistrict Map (XXI) Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map (XXI) Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map (XXX) Coastal High Hazard Area Map 000C) Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Words Underlined are added,words Struck-through are deleted.Version date 8/4/2014 H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\3rd+Resubmittal\Exhibit A GMPA Amend Lang 8-4-2014.docx I'',�. a: r I M: i csi ; it•'`44,z,43-,a.--,1,.-.7'lk . ,' '„ '',,..1 ' ', ' ''''' '..: '--N,. , .: -'A ��7 RIB #~ B,'a0 . ( ,': �;' Z Lo i 1 N Q t.• ya` ��r 4 ' Y - \ U u) Q i 'il . t,s _ f ITi e�°°s�+ J N LJ R TE'T : c h" �� ' O w co Z di 5 - c 0 °S3�t� Pi t`f�$�eeax,7 ril J W �: �'J Otcsfier. Q V ` ^ Q u r v )4P. m U cc 111111,..a 1110 11011 ■ 0111, CC 0 10 TA ASP Is _i 11/1■ LU --I 1/1-... 401,'44 A4eL M1111111111 ~ a ro° o t" Nw�It o w 1111: 111111111114''INN :,'',' % almikatillr. IMII CL 11401111111111 IIIII Z (.9 Z H Z ,...1 i T*1011111111. 111111 w a Z V • 3,O VO Y 2 w co ii CI- 2 2 2 Z M M Map 2 W N N N-CCU 0 J \ II b~ F- CO wowowo ' 2 3 0 1111111101111111 V _rom al li 1 g 11111 11111 i 0 ;ir , i > c w 1111 CO <C 1-: Q cc ati= 4141-, Z 44* I H 0 1 III rx co 4 IF. . MI 4,,,—, , . , % -- • ,c*, pi,. . ,i.k 4 ti �P ♦ ♦ sue ♦ ♦ �� �� 1-- UJ 4 tx, 414t ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ 0w ) 0 a. co 0 Lu p I- ♦ 0` `♦'♦LL It. Ilrirt4 k. ci>/i8 11/4 li E • lilt \ A ,,,,, z cc rfr .• till - W iiirill I EN II . Aistwili iiislilli _cc IMINIMIL 4. AEI <7 11111 IIII u. Nil 04 NMI�r ,r�r 4i43+1 • \ 1,�+• i. , 6 Y t ■ 1 ;w ` �, - - —1 p.+ ='s �. „�• ii ri .x _ e , s ■ .r.:'-' s, y .k �� .` y : n ti`s» ► -' ,'; : "� r� h, ��• i 7 ^ ��jj fw `I i l IAA ,,,•> Y �1 'r. \M: :a6 ;(„:‘4t* :,,,. rn y !,�y r ek> �� m o y T/y�J Z V—1Z ♦, �� Y h •P � f ... �• �• f ilii2 ,/,..," , lit\r7i tt,:,.. .t'. ,.� �b„t � - ,. ��'45.' .` /'! ; ,,' ,/, 'd " `' #....' peril,•. _ ' ' rr,.®# 4,a. ; �_• . ....- , { ,I �� f ''�,,,i �L �` I !J:0 \ ‘..t‘, *4,, ,),, 1111\•8 f � iff t ^ ,�• ,(e� '�`' - �`� sH$"70�"70�"7 J • D vi. n C7 �✓/ � .�• •� pt.'` s n�2 2 70r •-+t -0 M ft... ter` f Py � e !f• o�F o 0 0 D ' C Z b -� girt/ .$.4'•,-'44k��,, Z s * ' 8,1 W W W . n — G A/:°, 4, Aw r a r NN p A4 73 .fir' D p .. •- ,�• r 4IP-- Sik' tri Z i m .le *, t., filth al41�f40 i]m+/Mai y �.� L ;i !` .� t a •'R, " ' -y Hj r1 _ r 1 .. �y ii, • f CO 1•i l y'1�,� / / � J I '7,1'Z "' • °y, ;'l e•i ♦ , / Y ,-,..•ri ., ` •-:, 1.1 '1 i ti► i ' ' ° i x r ' '�� O ;4 :fc' /!f iy, // \; x57�`i_t 4, f .•./ •'/ -'� , ,Ill i� ■ �t a, . r� ;{ i ,.,'M1` �' + / r 1 1; �,y • 'elf a ^o cri F ' " 0 '.,t v m lii" ! ,. � /� N Z • t c j' ; ._- Z r t. % j. /-� y1� • �(j `+,,. �`�./. ,�A�' i n • p► Xi 4,14 X E iqL \D i p ~r\ _ N ! .714K 7 m ,Ti , Aw. :di. fit - . , ',., ,,l: It - r-- - 5. C-"- 'yr— •' 'I' ''' '' - ' ''' .'4r• ,o;4' ,-'"\ r. - ‘‘ ..,(c t iiI)idtE,.; ''fe , o Ci r Vii ' . `�4,,,� y'. ,,,4i,,4'---'_,,,N,,.It'\','.r 4' T4'4..-"1,,\..4:4,,'t'.4°,:',," °.7.. ' ':),,'i ty"r'il'zrr.:'1.:7%. 4 1:7' Z!.;. •,•i,,s...i. ':•7N',1:'. ST •' y ,. - e-. f7 YYY ' , r �1 C Ns ,n C ' /�j n g A a 8 O ti W o A Z 3■1■0-311111■ O O = W I §O1 2 0 Y3 8. w i I D 3 3 I It›R,.[ um= .< 7. 1 ♦ 2.11110 -. W r I - - illi . 4 dill' 71- iii Ma - i A x______ • 4\ , % `` ♦i D k ...,..... _, 7c, , , • •. n c m O_ Z m 44\ 81 mo '' • -4 � 410. ,..,1. .c`- .N ,-,cs, . . •6'..-1 . __ ...„,, 44 .,.c, . , ■ -..: ■ : cF -o m - - / I IIIII -n IIII n o =� Y c m , , O MO cn g , EN arm r rri 0)o 0 ikc�xm;� - �� m ��`- 01 10E0E0E CO .� 1� I' N N N m z aPo 0 0 $1w w w O O m0 I _ x � 0 O D � n T py .6 O tin 411fr � /�z r a Z ° III hills algill -o < x ✓ E. C7 o m Z 0 .5 ♦� o 6 m m 1 tip .�� m w m° f = o• mm'' 0 70 Z f*aaii z � 7o F -0 o21NWF3 0 4 < O .N„O O`< -u-i % p ip M c- • An Apo.. . 0111// .,..11111111E11111WO '''v -0 : t lik N x P,u)-- Illb rtil _o _< , , ot, : '.;,• 41■' d • AP ° 73 r04:° Z co 0 g -4 0, opmr - TANN. - W 5 4► �� - •, � o ��► 111 �� IP* 0 11 + 0 *a 10 ////"'l'ih .--,_ .„ 0 IIIIP 00. C>x.,- • g m cn C m xi E IP S S r-0 vv 30 NZ AAZ < r 4 S mm Sm E 000 > > xi 0, C = 2 w > hi m m V m 0m �m� D O < T v 3 r� A -Oo m-Oo Tm zmu, -zi Cu) z mm rm < o<A m v_0�-+ -n XI p0 3 C) C) >op my m Zm-' qm� >m mr 0 0 0 G) Z I 00 Z0 c Og =�A< 3c mz — 3 3 5 r N Z0 g0 m -o m= p�Dr -cm rZ m m m C m '� r3 m3 0 00 -I -1p�� �v S n n -I ..."1 m m m m ��� C0D D 3C 0 C Z ,gyp = DC) n zv ZZ r z? m r v W ;, 8 35 > 2'N 0>” rz z _H 00 00 r V No F g -<R, Q, r z z m z z O G go 1) N 3A D2 O Z o w 8 R�w r_, _.... w , � W ate M . ,..• ..„-......, ,.., ., ,....., ...„ ,, .. ..... , ,, . ,... ' \.:\ ,., .. . i.,„... ..:,„, .. .4„:,..„. .,_ ,„ ,. i., - '; ••••••■,0„."'"'" 44°P',•14.6",.'. '''. , , e '`.. &14.. • V 'ir. w.., , • , a": a . 7, C Cn fA �i X'r �, °C) . �—; • � .ti °P F x"63 ~n w: - ' ' '7<, 4114' - r* . . -Jill,. '.4.1V-,i-‘ M ' /14) .. ' „ '' . .,p,,,,i' - 'to ir se \ .,,,y, :" 0.'-', : L.:'''''''.::: z-- '''.:--,:e'''''‘ ''.' 441*44121rt:.'14. 10,;'IdTrit'41°. %0> 'mp...".1 ,(1:,:',.aik.:1r11144. ,: l': ...iillr., .,44,14,10' '''''•-121.:-.;:r'''''...';'-',',:','A'....,1:71' ....I 'i:1'..,.1...:1'. ":'.1,, 1 :,._ ' • �./r m i� t Sry '94 d'11. #;•. . _m C 1 V i ' ,,,,.10, -.,,./ 3 - . ,* ;, .'NV . .° r 07i ' --- - \-- ,,, :no , - ATI, - . 8-.:,--A4,-- '''''' ..--.i"......,.1; ,ft'-.4,1,, \. ... . - . ,. , _ , .-inn>...,, - .. .-. -,-/.., q Y' K co L•7 M1 loMogog d , 1 0 co 1 . ,e . , x N N N #`. � r w w w , 'o s;6. ‘':','1F\ / .,L,s, 4 ,,..-. ...',--..:,',.,. ..,;;;•-- .. * ,, , . . . ...ir:.ii„. . . ... 14 . iiiikr*,:. .,,,. ., ,_:;,..41.;..1, ..„ i ..$ 41111i--4 . 0 —� . , m - w r• -• Hu z .. !yr^e• '�C .r, ic; Lei.•• ,ti�.,. '�.,.:._ V'' 4 '. 1 �'.'s�+��(. r.li�'•'�� �$( y j 1f fir r'�r..t a)N 'T• #4.i► , C�Mr IN,it■i1 far ,. N 0 O O`�G :∎1111-7 'yf41 1 1*+� . * .� ^�' �i'i r 4, , .„',47-'-' . r d4 u=+r �li � 7�Y ; '+� _ �+ z �. air. ++r. +�r. ,��lir; w4; . + �'� `; ! f 4 .,. , D•. .diems ��i .de.$0,..wE+ �'"ee`"'�= ; Z / -n • 4,. !rimer a 7.'444L-111.1''' ,f. ,rte ' �� ..shemi wow..y7 F. T m r , .6. 0:1 *4 ' s' -7--.,,,...:- -',.. --4,,,, , ,Ar',"-- -'..-- . '- - - ' / -,- -,---.'-'-''-:.',.5' : . ,;',74.4,01.. , ... n L. \,,,,,,,,, —1-1. •''''''.--,r::,':i,L',:'''Ir'.,/; / I I, 0.. ... „..,,t,,,,r I, :. -4,0 _.,„-,..,. v .,.1_,,,..,..::-..,-;,:;,...,.,,,,,L..., , ,...,.,,,,/,,,,, . ..4.0.=.. "-* ...-l0 )r, (rr O x r .� �, '� • t ' � f g �"�, � A ? L � V ° 't-,,,. y, '' "F ' �• ' n , . ;� 3f!f r , � ' �•. ' ' ` Y.: , y '.:r I: ^r " . r1`� JJJJ ''`-' eF`/ "'-•::'•;:,,,7'... .. r y t,- ) ' _ • �' •wi`T N �I 'A x i 4 r 1. �6 ; y� r . c..r 41,: t "'� rat ': '�- 7, 8� g '"2<>> r`f k f , x . 2,`1 q'h. ,c , .7m#tom .- x ..•...�. y d. °'rt-'',", 's. s h x it $ i0 C CO M D CO Z C z r w vD °-- rn G7 CA m ° 7) > rn Z w o ° Z r CA m i rn CO EXHIBIT C-1 VINCENTIAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT October 2013 Prepared For: Global Properties of Naples,LLC. 2614 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 615 Naples, Florida 34103 (239) 692-8397 Prepared By: Passarella &Associates,Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 Project No. 12JCS2108 TABLE OF CONTENTS ,..., Page Introduction 1 Vegetation Associations and Land Uses 1 Soils 5 Jurisdictional Wetlands 7 Listed Species 7 Archaeological and Historical Resources 7 References 8 i LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Project Location Map 2 Figure 2. FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map 3 Figure 3. Soils Map 6 ii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Existing Land Use and Cover Summary 4 Table 2. Soils Listed by the NRCS 5 Table 3. SFWMD and COE Wetland Acreages by FLUCFCS Code 7 iii .-r LIST OF EXHIBITS Page Exhibit A. Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map A-1 Exhibit B. Listed Plant and Wildlife Species Survey B-1 Exhibit C. Correspondence from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources C-1 iv INTRODUCTION The following information regarding site conditions and environmental considerations has been prepared for the proposed Growth Management Plan(GMP)amendment for Vincentian(Project). The 30.68+ acre Project site is located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Figure 1). More specifically, it is found at the south corner of the intersection of US 41 South(Tamiami Trail East)and Southwest Boulevard. The property is bound to the northeast by US 41 and the Whistler's Cove apartment complex;to the east by the Hitching Post commercial plaza and Hitching Post mobile home park; to the south, southwest, and northwest by Trail Acres residential subdivision;and to the northwest by Southwest Boulevard and a Circle K gas station.The Project site itself is comprised mainly of forested uplands and wetlands that have been disturbed by the invasion of varying levels of exotic vegetation and an altered hydrologic regime. VEGETATION ASSOCATIONS AND LAND USES The Project's existing land uses include a combination of undeveloped,disturbed land and forested uplands and wetlands with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The vegetation associations for the property were delineated using December 2010 rectified color aerials (Scale: 1" = 200'); groundtruthing was conducted on February 19,2012. These delineations were classified based on the nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) Levels III and IV (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). Level IV FLUCFCS was utilized to denote disturbance and"E"codes were used to identify levels of exotic species invasion (i.e., melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa),and Brazilian pepper(Schinus terebinthifolius)).AutoCAD Map 3D 2011 software was used to determine the acreage of each mapped polygon,produce summaries,and generate the final FLUCFCS map (Figure 2 and Exhibit A). A total of seven vegetative associations and land uses(i.e.,FLUCFCS codes)were identified on the property. The dominant habitat type on the property is Pine Flatwoods,Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3), accounting for 37.2 percent of the property (11.40+ acres). Exotic vegetation documented on-site includes,but is not limited to,Brazilian pepper,melaleuca,java plum (Syzygium spp.), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and wedelia (Sphagneticola trilobata) (formerly known as Wedelia trilobata). The degree of exotic infestation ranges from 50 to 100 percent cover. Table 1 summarizes the FLUCFCS acreages; a brief description of each of the FLUCFCS classifications follows the table. 1 WC• P ... - - - PENS..--0,' WASsE ACKSOaVI LE �g. - ... PANAIdA\CITY _• 1'. i����7Ztl ' -- GAINESVILL' _.._ ONA: CH • —j �� e. .. . . 1 * It . .LAND• i r .. . • V E.2 A III• ,.C H sue I SAS•TA EACI �1 k � /� \ ;O, 1�Z�J NAP L FORT-IAl UDE MOT YE A D.A L of E 41" :k , W' T _n �e' '&11:4:1-.1..,,,,, t�1 --°Gulf F .'.• a� °�-- °--�— �` s KEY WEST Mexlco .i! ;Y.-% -0110 l i0�f � -0 C f I ' `3 ,,, .N s:, t - ee "�s 4 • ;i -Tn� �+ ` � ,r*. '� i � Ut E IT ��3d *' { R 3i i t cF„.j C } 1 µ": ,f,...:4'...'4- '''='.,-,,,,-- Ert iF*:- -.4, � 'b y I! \1e�r _V41.! J'�' 1 ` • ,aa:t1 x Z 2 ABLA KBIRN.r RD L'` ,:k--�r rl EXCHr N AVE:- a 71 i am . J.R "( ° ..t!cr l Q Cmf rrL'/. �-t D r - i 5. ..' J� e N E!T K D I,.- \.v , �.— t�. z =-0.,,,, am y •n I� }S .y� I RADI RD � ... F� . I, 4 '-. 1*i w } ,* r J J . ,04 s 411g 4k LI .,.V 6 � •-11,"-';74,1-:g-r-," P I,r -s, -D � '' • yq1,Sa 3e i a � f r it5 �`v.s ! fr, mow am. y " m r. /1Ory SC VtT�� Lm l •• c' a fi ;}-a t 1 I ,../. 1-0...-4,-,1744,t .a! sa� t�fi N P jcp 0" ' y ` � ', -ESTEIAE 3 ' rr m � 1 9 P 2 1,yy,, ,-.•� 'v } w §°• r ir v�� [i= _ -y 7VIS BLVD _ .SS IT �R V •a t Y - D r z � - s P -4 a- •. f,yI 7t9 g? F a z 1a _ - i ,,,,-4:-.-,4_•••. r. F. v,- li ' ._i ° 3 � r I •, n :14 . . _ ,Y . to }s .,< j 3' t„ Iy-,-.. ;g,g@v l,, ,y i T- y 6Y i. 'e ,* 4,, s r . . � V C -` :Y�' 1 . � r tF6.LW i 1: r_l0 F 4 , ' - s a3O � tr. e-P.F.'- - `Y ;..:1.014:' �- x " , „1.3.,.-• LZ* �� ..LL! ' •J-' Y. .:. F.RE�1•$r eIR D�i.'k•1'."'i���JVt•,�,`[•`'Ri D .-"�• K!- Sc % ' :'Ejc 6 eYfie¢ct Si.A�. Ar L i• .�i'•�r,IYL R?> � « • 5*r �t !,, xc -' ."-F 2 ." ' c, ' . 9,-,,:,,,I,...� t"`d j � 6 : r 1��, ¢+ , _ s, t.,N-- r a .- l ?: 7 Y s ;" .^' ,', 01 l �P f ' ✓FO #, � �� sLN.fo V- i' : �k ',_G S r zr 1 5 J ix .. s S „ 1.1,14,v.1-,-5-:, - I nti t T's .,• i» FT'..,::,.+�t _ �, to. '',.-7-T' e ii ".,} `• l ° ' ti .;.-1; q? 4 t-% t 4 �_ [ 16 i; t f" W ° ,' ,F: y f rs,� 5 ' 'I � : r �i. ESN KEFAOCKRD 9 'PIP u T�OM J s � M a t;' F''1 -- • • r•t c 4s r.a • flit 1, lit. ,:_ .-4_ .r it a "- 4.' 1F'l � �-; P r-' t ' T•. ,, :,4 f I b a� 7 O � 0::., '1 f-t r r y F , s � +Q04 qt.,, (i P.- ' O I% - r r •$"� �i,- a u t . }r, le' q ' wr e rS,' x`< --�' r x r iKr ` S � ' O *pip ; . y . y 14.-Pt.i S , OrY qc � _ j � idl l' ��1 � r L_ s , G�!r I Fm 1 . ' f..,x tri FaL , j�Y _ aY .z " A yIA s .:q,. •,4.t.1 4 r,11 , Q i � - y? `t �': . �, -t a i ✓r -1Y;,,,..4=.•- , I I - F a:Q rO r i' J � 'f } `� � 1 Tj 0 j i J ' s a }E i f fv , Wi_� 03, i� ,1 . i $ , F t , .rr 7. ;.. „ Z . F E x.-'7f t µ , ; .r rY Sr G N', y — L - 'p a , SST t.ti 1� fi K r ' ry ' °:y,k PROTECT ' ST '�; y ,, w'_ s`. 11 =r I � a 1?. ,S RNG26E 4 :.• .- F _y * I wv ism .s' I� r � ,!„LOCATION �. im 4 > fi' d ' J .•Fl ii .50S, ° '.`a' 1ei t m. � � f I.' � J . e l} R. SEC 32,TINT' ,y d 'r F r ��t . �.1 1r I i jil " i �, l j�-°, `I x i.�;r _ l I r 9 I t ! I a f u 3- * 0 6 � �' t tCr..` r r} , r 1Ty,, y -. 9) "co 4", T-P I'.i' �, , y t to y7 c y d f� _E t -.4` rc S H pr ,�-+C d� , .t u i }is U1 ,. Q �. Z�. t L 4 _ J c J ry'-1• f l E.L� � Q- L. : y > Jeri). E ., . � z r Ii - u ,, � ', ,1a 1 , ND•P j Ia t y [fi ; ?r<w 5. '--14-'..OF -� � /. .' I. vl j 'V• .g' ; yHELLIS ~ _ (¢ X" c r 1,k r•1t '�t b*' m . : r- 'r - n �e C� 9 a ' aJ l ll yL^ Et DRA\\T1IIY DATE 3/8/12 P.F. FIGURE 1.PROJECT LOCATION MAP REVIEWED BY DATE PASSARELLA VINCENTIAN B.B. 3/8/12 REVISED DAB --...r...,. & ASSOCIATES2 2 A4119E3 (0.54 Ac.±) W SCALE:1"=200' W W GS 4159E4 W W W 4 (1.55 Ac.±) W W W W W W W W 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, W W W W W W W 6249E4 W W W W 4, W .(5.72 Ac.±) W Ni O' t.\' W W 4, W 4, W W W 4, a‘ 4, 4, W 4, W 4, W 4, W W VV, W W W W W 4, W 4, W W�� J W W W W 4, W W W W W SO W W W W • W W W 4119E2 4119E3 4, W W '(0.14 Ac.±)' W W• W 4159E4 (4.69 Ac.±) W W W W W W (0.75 Ac.±) W 4, W v W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 4, W W W 4, 4, 4159E3 W W W .4' 4' W W W W (0.87 Ac.±) 4' W W W W W 4' W W W W W W W 4, 4 4' 4, 4119E2 W W 4, W W W W W ( �t0.03 AC.±)y W W 4, W 4, W 4' W W 4, W v W W W 6249E3 4, W W W W W W W W W 4, W 4 `4W W 4, W W W W W W W 4, W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 4, W W W W W W 4, W W W W -(S) 4, W 4, W ,�Z W W 6249E3 (2 W W W (6.91 Ac.±) W W S' W W W W 4, W W W W W W W W W W S W W W W 4, W W W m - W W W W W W W 740 P/L W W W W W W W W (0.19 Ac.± W W W 4, W W 4, W W W 4, 4, W W W W W W W W 4, LEGEND: W W W 4119E3 t SFWMD AND COE WETLANDS W W (6.16 Ac.±) GC " (12.66 Ac.±) W W 0 i. ...../V SURVEYED WETLAND LINE W W W Q it W 4159E4 a t (3.10 Ac.±) z K s NOTES: FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM P=200'AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. a = FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE,COVER AND FORMS Ili CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM(FLUCFCS)(FDOT 1999). FLUCFCS %OF S UPLAND/WETLAND LINES WERE APPROVED BY SFWMD CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL ON MAY 17,2012 AND BY THE COE ON JULY 18,2012. 4119 E2• PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(25-49%EXOTICS) 0.17 Ac.± 0.6% WETLAND LINES PER MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 11.40 Ac.± 37.2% DRAWING No.E-005 12-075 ENV LOC VINC.DwG DATED 4159 E3 PINE,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 0.86Ac.± 2.8% JULY 18.2012 4159 E4 PINE,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.40 Ac.± 17.6% ii 6249 E3 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.± 22.6% PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER MARCO SURVEYING& 6249 E4 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.72 Ac.± 18.6% MAPPING LLC. DRAWING No. P092-VINCENTIAN-PUD_V4. 740 DISTURBED LAND OWE DATED MARCH 19,2012. 0.19 Ac.± 0.6% TOTAL 30.68 Ac.± 100.0% ...^\ D RAWN BY DATE H.H. 7/19/12 PASSARELLA FIGURE 2.FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP REVIEWED BY DATE VINCENTIAN B.B. 7/19/12 li REVISED DATE -z _& ASSOCIATES z 3 Table 1. Existing Land Use and Cover Summary FLUCFCS Description Acreage Percent Code of Total 4119 E2 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed(25-49%Exotics) 0.17 0.6 4119 E3 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed(50-75% Exotics) 11.40 37.2 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 0.86 2.8 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed(76-100%Exotics) 5.40 17.6 6249 E3 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6.94 22.6 (50-75%Exotics) 6249 E4 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 5.72 18.6 (76-100%Exotics) 740 Disturbed Land 0.19 0.6 Totals 30.68 100.0 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed(25-49%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2) This upland habitat occupies 0.17±acre or 0.6 percent of the Project site. The canopy is dominated by slash pine (Pinus elliottii)and also contains melaleuca,earleaf acacia,and widely scattered java plum. The sub-canopy contains scattered slash pine, Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto(Serenoa repens)and also contains wedelia,broomsedge(Andropogon virginicus),muscadine grape(Vitis rotundifolia),poison ivy(Toxicodendron radicans),bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), and earleaf acacia. Pine Flatwoods,Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3) This upland habitat occupies 11.40± acres or 37.2 percent of the Project site. This community is similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2;however,the canopy and sub-canopy consist of 50 to 75 percent Brazilian pepper,melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. Pine, Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3) This upland habitat occupies 0.86±acre or 2.8 percent of the Project site. The canopy is dominated by slash pine and also contains melaleuca,earleaf acacia, and widely scattered java plum.The sub- canopy contains scattered slash pine, Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm, melaleuca, earleaf acacia, myrsine(Rapaneapunctata),and wax myrtle.The ground cover is mostly open with widely scattered saw palmetto, cabbage palm, muscadine grape, poison ivy, bracken fern, wedelia, St. Augustine grass, and earleaf acacia. Pine, Disturbed(76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E4) This upland habitat occupies 5.40± acres or 17.6 percent of the Project site. This community is similar to FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3;however,the canopy and sub-canopy consist of 50 to 75 percent Brazilian pepper,melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. 4 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm,Disturbed (50-75%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3) This wetland habitat occupies 6.94+ acres or 22.6 percent of the Project site. The canopy in this wetland community is dominated by equal amounts of slash pine and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and also contains melaleuca and earleaf acacia. The sub-canopy consists of slash pine, bald cypress,melaleuca,earleaf acacia,wax myrtle,Brazilian pepper,and cabbage palm.The ground cover includes swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), climbing hempvine (Mikania scandens), rush fuirena(Fuirena scirpoidea),wiregrass(Aristida stricta),sawgrass(Cladium jamaicense),yellow- eyed grass(Xyris sp.),gulfdune paspalum(Paspauum monostachyum),Asiatic pennywort(Centella asiatica), and horned beaksedge (Rhynchospora inundata). Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (76-100%Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E4) This wetland habitat occupies 5.72+ acres or 18.6 percent of the Project site. This community is similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3;however,the canopy and sub-canopy consist of 50 to 75 percent Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740) This upland land use runs along the southeastern boundary property. It occupies 0.19±acre or 0.6 percent of the Project site. The canopy and sub-canopy are open. The ground cover is a mixture of species common to disturbed areas including wedelia,Mexican clover(Richardia sp.),muscadine grape, and lovevine (Cassytha filiformis). SOILS ^ The soils for the property,per the Natural Resource Conservation Service(NRCS)(formerly the Soil Conservation Service), are shown on Figure 3 and listed in Table 2. The "Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook" (Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists 1995) lists Holopaw Fine Sand (No. 27) as a hydric soil. Immokalee Fine Sand (No. 7); Urban Land (No. 32) and Urban Land— Immokalee-Oldsmar, Limestone Substratum, Complex(No. 34) are listed as non-hydric soils. Table 2. Soils Listed by the NRCS Mapping Unit Description Hydric/Non-Hydric* 7 Immokalee Fine Sand No 27 Holopaw Fine Sand Yes 32 Urban Land No 34 Urban Land—Immokalee-Oldsmar, Limestone No Substratum, Complex *Per.the"Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook" (Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists 1995). 5 —r : r tj + : \--..` �H/S ERS ov etP (�:I tiJ H P.]} n Y a7 �•Qft�- j• r{• 1 `� FCF /Y �i'7ti:•Sri �{ s ! '� )., ._ 0 .r�,e , :-...`L - : 1,-.. .• ,. ,• $J t ,,r a ,-1 , -:'S•> -* r•� r PROJECT a .- • b* � r `• try = :f .� V t� t � „ ,,,,..4-1--,\_ F LOCATION }��� - -,. '� r, s > . ,n j - ryy Ta` a1'. r�♦y ;�{ .A.,-;:-.r '4 `}e r.� •k °z`l. F . .�•� / )' __ 7 ,l„3 * 1/' 1 -1 iS• *ems `. •:e_,. . d ; • { arn, "i'1.'`i `s��•Ik�}h .. e �, ; J1 .V:�f., —4.;• \-K0, .• it 4,e...:1-1V,,,--v.v.:-, .stIt..,..„\l� . ' '-�4 .• i , --,„...- $fa S.jjl�y� . i mil+' "_'�” 3 r�» ti.'� �- � ,v. � �`�.ice`r • �_. � �, �`' { E_ -*fk h ,- d• F .Ta ''-, f.•.y s "1.4,,- •Lj`t`` y 0,-,-' d +a S..,,,,e' t`� Iri _ `� .,t,'� i �t, �r talfel �,'�9F' i` '•'Fs },r "'^k.� }l �'` �r,' �� � . v ?� c rjj`ry . r ,{ �. :-(,,,,,,,-M-'' tit st ' _ <1!:,-;.--- ; IDs 1, '•`' s...*, 4-T`� - .��T , �s_ . ` -tu Y ' ' - • •.p... - „� �I�+ ,!'ti�-1 14 h'. { ,:y.rt .• T. ^y,, -- 1.0.1..4.. '� _ .' .. �- `lk. �1 -- :- '. ?.}, j,,,,, � M� l j v { . J 2 J }�,.}iy k� ; � • .' --." d G ' "!' ?5'' J., r�6�, • irR•Tr- 6-; ' _ `• #' Y� -,k�`b .1, '. c,_ '„♦R s'14.,.." r . A 'r(. ! " rj�` �' r . Ic...r� '+ r '�'rt",=T{ Y '4;: '.-t}'. K ., -',..4....-' i' ` Gaya . ,. f': J ; 3 14 4 9 �k .:440 ,:14th ` Y ,i ., { J',3 , �t yt �{K, 1•'\'!:',,4'rV , `,' t lk T j • r s tr � ,J. F# t ' 4' b '• YS ! j + a 4, z-?' .jy J � ,I 'k • .- ]h S'- A d ' 5;- ' ti7i,. • _ t ,,rr tw t , - -- . ..v _ ' -07...VA-7.. .!_' ''",.,4- .,,, '.• :,...'• ,*... ,:*-•%J.I. "*': 114'" • ••' 'j ...--z1#4.- '. ,04,. .. i.., . _ 4.,,_,y . ,.....,,, ....._ , , .. , . . ,. „...„. „,,,, t . . ..• , .. , , -, ..,:-..„, . ,..,_...,-,. ?4. . ..„-- ..., 7,.,,....._ .,_ ,:,-,,, ., :„. - ._,..4�/A\R i` •� t ,l'-` s• �6�, - - 1� _ .f � .a� _ •._:�t,*��{;;`-'1'...--'-. yt � :si,e z �•�t'fi,i►.' p �i�rJ�^ryj!f : ';,,, 1 '-`-C _ �:71N.... a t ' .....1.1'.1.'-::.. '3.'f * ''4 r "r t 1 CSC ;�' '.7-1--. g1`t.ry'�' t.��lL. *L . I ‘r '1/4 '''. A... , .‘tt..,.:4" rb.. ;";141111A111c4 4W-L ICC"':m yr. _ i -. C .0:',14 •'Y' _.:.4,,s.'...,4.1-e.' t'M•+ t:p 1 _ L- ', : � '' U' 7 • •11-;.4";-_,1_'B >,ti. � jsi' � ,YF.� : 1� ,o•1 , ' a a`' '+ 4 +fit 1 'y •a }f, .' r T ! ',./..1'.- 4 4 a a - is r 1 et _ A0,9 �_ti � _ -el�a. '�.�i• y,'7 4r � � _ t l` °.:',{. �!' s ;- .,4. :+ r i': , >� i a 4.`,-°':-4-.,-:- .." -- _- `_-'Sx . .x:•.* ?,..-�R .^ _ p„ TV"' _ ?. x". ."0 / . _ -II! , r _ sue=. ;. �, NOTES: i AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH Soil Unit Description Hydric THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S P. 5 7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND NO OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2010. Fr LEGEND 27 HOLOPAW FINE SAND YES A 32 URBAN LAND NO PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER MARCO SURVEYING z VINCENT IAN W 34 URBAN LAND-IMMOKALEE-OLDSMAR,LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM,COMPLEX NO fl MAPPING LLC.DRAWING No.P092-VINCENTIAN- PUD_V4.owc DATED MARCH 19,2012. co ' HYDRIC ROADWAY NETWORKS WERE ACQUIRED FROM THE � i •----- — FLORIDA GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY WEBSITE. 0 250 500 SOILS MAPPING WAS ACQUIRED FROM THE FLORIDA Feet GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY WEBSITE OCTOBER /"s 2007 AND CREATED BY THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 1990. DRAWN BY DATE H.H. 3/20/12 �E �°°Y DATE PASSARELLA 2' FIGURE 3. SOILS B.B. 3/20/12 VINCENTIAN REVISED DATE ,x ASSOCIATES_ 6 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS The subject property was reviewed for both state and federal wetland jurisdiction using the "Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters" (Chapter 62-340, Florida Administrative Code) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Wetland Delineation Manual (COE 1987). The Project site contains 12.66±acres of South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)and COE jurisdictional wetlands (Figure 2 and Exhibit A). The jurisdictional wetlands identified by FLUCFCS code include approximately 6.94 acres of Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm,Disturbed(50- 75%Exotics)(FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3)and 5.72+acres of Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm,Disturbed (76-100%Exotics)(FLUCFCS Code 6249 E4).The estimated SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands for the property are shown in Figure 2 and Exhibit A.The jurisdictional wetlands by FLUCFCS code are summarized in Table 3. SFWMD Permit No. 11-03454-P was issued for the property on June 3,2013 and COE Permit No. SAJ-2013-01268 was issued on June 24,2013. Table 3. SFWMD and COE Wetland Acreages by FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage 6249 E3 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed(50-75%Exotics) 6.94 6249 E4 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm,Disturbed (76-100%Exotics) 5.72 Total 12.66 LISTED SPECIES A listed plant and wildlife species survey was conducted by Passarella& Associates, Inc. on the Project site on April 7, 1998 and March 6,2012. Additional observations were made on February 19 and 24, 2012 during vegetation mapping and other fieldwork. No listed wildlife species were observed during the listed species surveys or other work conducted on the Project site. The survey methodology and results are provided as Exhibit B. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES Correspondence was received from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources on May 18, 1998 which stated that no significant archaeological or historical sites were known to be present within or near the Project area. A copy of this correspondence is included as Exhibit C. 7 REFERENCES Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists. 1995. Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Second Edition. Victor W. Carlisle, Ed. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Fauns Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. 8 EXHIBIT A AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP r .., .s., . . __ , ... ,__,,... . . :,_ . ,,,, • ‘,. .., •....., ....r, A- • . d. (0 54 At.±.) " b . f 4 -w r JS 1"=2001 ` r �, • t W� a � • `' 0,.... `.•°....: : 4159:4• w.. ,, F 1 W W .. w _0.5 c . x n + ww �.t .• '`' 't. � ,, . .W 4 w W 6249E4, w ,./W" k ` %.,..,! ,4:s • t, _ l W W .(572-A 'f ' J , ..,—,. ,\O � .i . y , ' w' fW r IV`� CD w. ra, 9 w 1 4 . W W, t:• �• 47. ' 4/9E2 W'• - ...-.-*.,•-•4 , - • ,t , ` u 4 - 3 .. '(04 A )' W *.W 9E 9E ti'- W y w1 w 0 ��C 4 � • �tiN•(4.69 Ac.t) L` . - ti a n - W W .y W. W, W as l fir . ` ' '✓' y- * •• IIIPh• � 4164E ai 6 • '- • • (0. i A ). a, ..J '. W 4. W ,4.:4,i.:4,' .. '� � R• • w" 4' w'- a' * 0.03 AQ#)9*: W ,r,r' 'e w. i ' . i f -.. ,. 6249E3 W . "W w wz• c y, ,i 1 w . . >a W,,. w•, ..,i N ,• • \• sa (0.03 AC.t) t• - . w' VW ' y. . r _. • „ Y. 4, '".el,• %It, W p W W W y , W w.• 'W ;wr 's so ,• -r Y '4' . (6 9i-Ac.±) _ - S �(• S� W - `W.. * W ,✓`V • rW w - ` w 740• • -. c° C \ ' _ > f x w W �w _ • • W Wy � . ' — I 'ref. W- W w' _ 51193 :I LEGEND: k .y . w W ., x J i I v . SFWMD AND COE WETLANDS • W w r .` ' ~•r x ' t (12.66 Ac.±) SZ" 4. W.• moo. r• ` � /./ • SURVEYED WETLAND LINE �� _� W` •y r '�-�°•' ,�i,�'� � , > . I p v 4154E4 r Z —. 3 1 (3:10 Ac.±) } Y : NOTES: ! ., 3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH F' ...1::: f } •THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S r ..-, -.3 ��TT , i OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF JANUARY 2012. ., a•+IK • # 5 1 a FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM I"=200'AERIAL ''. ,I �, y V '_ , ,. 1I 11 33 •' . • lit PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. . cs _ a - .1' 1L r. J• FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE,COVER AND FORMS FLUCFCS % CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM(FLUCFCS)(FDOT 1999). CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL LL UPLAND/WETLAND LINES WERE APPROVED BY SFWMD 4119 E2 PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(25-49%EXOTICS) 0.17 Ac.± 0.6% 1 ON MAY 17,2012 AND BY THE COE ON JULY I8,2012. 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 11.40Ac.± 37.2% 4159 E3 PINE,DISTURBED(50-75%EXOTICS) 0.86Ac.± 28% WETLAND LINES PER MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING 4159 E4 PINE,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.40 Ac.± 17.6% DRAWING No.E-005 12-075 ENV LOC VINC.DWG DATED JULY 18,2012 6249 E3 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(50.75%EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.± 22.6% 6249 E4 CYPRESS/PINE/CABBAGE PALM,DISTURBED(76-100%EXOTICS) 5.72 Ac.± 18.6% /PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER MARCO SURVEYING 5 740 DISTURBED LAND 0.19 Ac.± 0,6% 'PING LLC.DRAWING No.P092-VINCENTIAN-PUD_V4. TOTAL 30.68 Ac.± 100.0% DATED MARCH 19,2012. `s DRAWN BY DATE H.H. 7/19/12 PAS SARE LLA EXHIBIT A.AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP REVIEWED BY DATE VINCENTI B.B. 7/19/12 AN Consulting-- REVISED DATE „ COk' II & ASSOCIATES 2 EXHIBIT B LISTED PLANT AND WILDIFE SPECIES SURVEY VINCENTIAN LISTED SPECIES SURVEY April 24,2012 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PM) on March 6, 2012 for Vincentian (Project). The Project includes a proposed commercial development with associated infrastructure and stormwater management system. The purpose of the survey was to review the Project area for plant and wildlife species listed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, species of special concern, or commercially exploited. The survey is also intended to be consistent with the environmental data submittal and protected plant requirements as outlined in Sections 10.02.02.A.3.b and 3.04.03, respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC). Vincentian is 30.681 acres and is located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County(Figure 1). More specifically, it is located in a densely urban area at the southeast corner of the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and US 41 (a.k.a. Tamiami Trail East). The Project is bound to the northeast by US 41 and the Whistler's Cove apartment complex, to the east by the Hitching Post plaza and Hitching Post mobile home park, to the south by residential development, and to the west and northwest by residential development and a BP gas station, respectively. The Project site is comprised of disturbed, forested uplands and wetlands with varying levels of exotic vegetation. The results of the March 6, 2012 survey found no listed wildlife species on-site. This result is also consistent with a prior wildlife survey conducted by PAI on April 7, 1998, as part of the initial review process for the property. Two Collier County listed "Less Rare Plants," inflated wild-pine (Tillandsia balbisiana) and stiff-leaved wild-pine (T. fasiculata) were observed scattered throughout the site during the 2012 survey. Further details regarding the more recent survey's methodology and results are as follows: METHODOLOGY AND DISCUSSION The listed plant and wildlife species survey included an on-site review, conducted on March 6, 2012, and subsequent literature search for local, state, and federal listed species. The results of the on-site review found no listed wildlife species or their signs (i.e., tracks, burrows, scat, calls, etc.). The literature search also found no documented occurrences for listed wildlife species on the property and the Project is not located within designated habitat areas for any listed wildlife species. Further details regarding the literature search results and survey methodology are as follows: B-1 The literature search involved an examination of available information on protected species in the Project's geographicalsiegion. The literature sources reviewed included the FWCC Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (2011); Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991); USFWS Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) in the Southeast Region (1987); the Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan (Logan et al. 1993); the Landscape Conservation Strategy Map (Kautz et al. 2006); and the USFWS and/or the FWCC databases for telemetry locations of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), bald eagle, red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCW), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), and wading bird rookeries, such as the wood stork (Mycteria americana), in Collier County. The results of the literature search found no documented occurrences of listed wildlife species on-site (Figure 2). The wildlife agencies' database information is updated on a periodic basis and it is current through different dates, depending on the species. The FWCC information is current through the noted dates for the four following species: Florida panther telemetry—June 2011; bald eagle nest locations — October 2011; black bear telemetry—December 2007; and RCW locations—August 2011. The USFWS information for the Florida scrub jay is current to September 2006. As previously noted, the results of the literature search found no documented occurrences of listed wildlife species on-site (Figure 2). The closest documented bald eagle nest is CO-010 which is located approximately 1.7 miles to the northwest of the site. The nest distance is beyond the USFWS and the FWCC recommended 660-foot buffer protection zone for active and alternate bald eagle nests. The bald eagle is not a listed species, but is protected under the Golden and Bald Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. No RCW colonies or cavity trees have been documented within the Project area,per the FWCC's database (Figure 2). The closest noted RCW colony is located approximately 1.9 miles northeast of the Project site. This location, along with the others documented west of County Road (CR) 951 (a.k.a. Collier Boulevard), are considered relic or historic locations, as there are no currently known active cavity trees west of Collier Boulevard, based on PAI's survey experience in this region over the last 16 years. The USFWS considers suitable habitat for RCW to include any forested community with pines in the canopy that encompasses more than 10.0± acres (i.e., includes both on- and off-site). Although the Project area does have canopy pine trees, no cavities were noted during the survey and no sightings were documented in the area. The RCW is a state and federally listed endangered species. The FWCC database contains no documented Florida black bear radio-telemetry locations on- site or within a 1.5 mile radius of the Project area (Figure 2). The site's relatively small size and densely urban surroundings do not lend it support as suitable habitat for this species. The Florida black bear is a state listed threatened species, but is currently under study for delisting by the FWCC (Barco 2011). No Florida panther telemetry is located on-site (Figure 2). One historical telemetry point was recorded within one-half mile of the Project area. The historical telemetry was from Texas Cougar 101 and was recorded in May 1995. Since that date, no panther telemetry points have B-2 been recorded within one-half mile of the Project site. The property does not occur within the Florida Panther Zones (Kautz et al. 2006) and/or Focus Area (FA) (Figure 3). The Florida panther is a state and federally listed endangered species. The literature search confirmed that the Project is not located within the 30 kilometer (18.6 miles) Core Foraging Area(CFA) of any documented wood stork rookeries (Figure 4). The site's mixed slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) community would provide some suitable foraging habitat for the wood stork; however, the heavy invasion by exotic species, such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquinervia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and java plum (Syzygium cumini) in the canopy and sub-canopy strata make it difficult for the birds to access and utilize. As a result, the property's foraging potential is rather poor. The wood stork is a state and federally listed endangered species. Per Collier County LDC Section 3.04.03 (Requirements for Protected Plants), two listed "Less Rare Plants" were observed scattered throughout the property. They included the inflated and stiff-leaved wild pines. Two other listed"Less Rare Plants"which are likely to occur on-site,but were not observed include the giant wild-pine (T utriculata) and butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis). Although these plants are protected at the state and local levels of government, they are rather ubiquitous to Southwest Florida. If these plant species are not already located within the future designated, retained, native vegetation preserve, then they will be relocated to the preserve,per the requirements of the LDC. The March 6, 2012 field survey methodology consisted of qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects across the property (Figure 5). The transects were generally walked approximately 100 feet apart depending on habitat type and visibility. The weather during the survey was sunny, with clear skies, light wind, and temperatures ranging from the low to mid 80's. The survey began around 9:30 a.m. and ended approximately at 12:00 p.m. RESULTS The results of the March 6, 2012 survey found no listed wildlife species on-site. With the exception of one historical panther telemetry point, the literature search of the wildlife agencies' databases found no documented occurrences for listed species within the Project area or immediate vicinity. The Project site is not located within the designated zones or FA for the Florida panther. It is not located within the CFA of any wood stork colonies and is not located in the vicinity of any active RCW colonies or bald eagle nests. Two of Collier County's listed "Less Rare Plants"were observed on-site. These and any others, if encountered, will be relocated to the future designated retained native vegetation area,per the requirements of the LDC. B-3 REFERENCES Barco, K. 2011. FWCC Chairman's column: Florida black bear....a conservation success story. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. FWCC. 2011. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. Official Lists, Bureau of Non- Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume. 130, Issue 1, Pages 118-133 Logan, Todd,Andrew C. Eller, Jr., Ross Morrell,Donna Ruffner, and Jim Sewell. 1993. Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan South Florida Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. USFWS. 1987. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region. B-4 :-.(x.,.._.- .. .,. P .y JACK•L�VILLE Ong-,, PANAMAIC TY , _., �l��lD i`! �� �� GAIN-Sta,KE'� It �y DA ONA:EACH �,r( { ∎ a• flLAND, IlliVV TAMPA Plir#40 C iR0 BEACH * 1 SARASOTA .-LA EPLACID ;. [ Nt FgBR M )14,c- 'ar'``F / W NAP FORT-LAIeIDEPDALE Gulf ` a° w g MIAMI •Mexico +'-= KEY WEST -°Sk,.Y 6`F'd �- l' GI �`F`� �r dart w t' £3(IT; _ I! l �¢{ , t7 i ' �,• EX H N EfAVE. A r rZ K �t�t > _Toll S-"F Icy n', . +X > I y -� s•i.... ,P III y V �,�` r ark _ Y '`1 � .I r•-'.( iF ''•! ' 'ti e I 1: L.>'-in r,e .E �,, �°'S- e..• ! ^I y .-. 1-s RADIO) D_>' s- p� �� z °r So RADII¢LN 'z BECK BL D 75 i-8L9CK91lRN_D S.L3�4 ,_f !- _ 3 ,'`! ?,I `_'yri a -�-t-,y l!/� rl�.' „v'. -rat \ E a�_ : �Kr..r� ". ,.,,,y,,...,,..):a +T4 ,s::• -' ;1t:; to( w t +d� k� � £�_ !• rw r .. VI4,1 D E� ' '' �-1 ^�. -1 s coq�i aj 'A -,:•'.i.,..,,_:,, ? :. �i� eAt`r ...- „ 61, J� �'4- : ` .V .aa'..� ,t tE ''4 LFS HEttIT, E, AI s -,�, s.�:.`i l••?tea {.: , 3,. f t , t.r r . - Ct'+�",-'• A a dt q Sr ij -. 'L yi Nr l y•�� ,tsppn t` 1 , a;L - ws 1 "``^CCCCQ•.1_ l ' - .r. s iT e4tT' a ",q i,• ): •i rr,c(0? i a R'1� - t T t// [ a - r -',t4_'d "NiA ,. _ .t G .1 '��.. '`� 8 1• ''' Z � �r 41 1, + 4� r �T5� a 'l"`„ 'r-RwRy ,N: tt aa '''ms 'E 5�.i I WeRES D —',lc r� ^ w; s.' t ...r a t , r- 7 'a ra r a a c r d'�`N /I4DKII�tiSI�V7t ( 4P.',..•- _iF t45'.. r �'.y �•• i . L I )ilk'; a 9 { T OMA SQN' ' ;i ,l,ESN ' HHAMM_OC RD. Q- 'i =--,:fir,-!' °f i ''.1,-....'"b 5 *•, ' .. el, .. xt P;i ,., r;..:P_ s 'ayrt,7,� c }a J r '4` ', w .-' zy R `sR i =:-`-'--.24.:41 .7-4.-r i*-•ut• B V T. ' aye} f •1 r PI! - U9. e •`� S s,� yP ; . t °'?, i-.• `°v" r_{( .tlr ' -'+f '�` A' c:c�av '„-1 Ss, r"'•''t a QK _i 4.. r° i" S�,a�'•� �?'':�.,4?- 7: < 6t' o ,t � � ti:'4 c 't•. K . 'e Z Q.'• sc` y` ,4,4,4-,-, �IIA R ffi4- - � �r �9L4� r2 pt . . 101,' Fg • ,e4-m A,,,- -11. • a^. , if* i 3[..4•- ,} 1'._ ::S i 'Q; .� } �,q 1•'�b�.°.�' '(�F- yw .3.5dc { P r - I> ti s°:�`,x�, '1G ' E • J. -. yt G' c 0y� 9, a i 0.72.E W its fs. _�l< ,tl'is•2,;- �r` ,•tl' .' - x�t 'ate, ,s,-- 1%.- ,. ,m4.-011 a2 _ 6 4i,t.1 it .o%5.-'�Sa_7 fig- i •'tis .. -iv rs i4;n- u.+ �', \9 V� i Q S i 3 3y 1 J R �� lri { A F 9S` 'taa„u,�x f `w 43 ° r �_r ,e " 3 lirl i� �F ,• ie:.f.''e f� -%.„2,1„;2_.-„,,,L4,1.1_,--.4.....Itf ' l M 4 4 _r r . r K S = t °4• Z _ ^ _;40,k7-'-'' ' F,' '4' `` ' -`•; ,4.)-,s ` �' `& t f c � �'e;. t �. ,P1--,. 14�`'` - ' °'}A AT .Sc,;--. - 1 w : « 'fi = #it}e7+F• ti r - s-, '61'-.Sp ,''C ! T1 •, �. Lis. t i4" tk�':F A'.�` -s __ 3 E a o A, PROJECT LOCATION g� , / j ;:r�- f r 3— " .,,z,;.•:..,,-� Y 1 SEC 32,TWP 50 S,RNG 26 E , M,P�RI�EST '� �` , �" .tom r• v a � * t,c ;a b r ;_`,(ti Z 4, b� -` l 1 it ,: 1 Al — I. y„ r -� _ yL �G �y�yy�Iy. -, i.r\ .i ''''..\,:::,?. ., Z- \v : Y „, _Air '-i Ali 91--- '- (. I.� Il __" ' fly 4 r - i" t! .q-' {r. �I #c _i*i� _. F :5� Tt. �f! IISI' I I rl' r.i I T- -fir .0 1 e et,r - J e y .,rr. r-a 5 J'f... _ ti \r. `r s 1;i„_, .'t� ER RD I'v_i --' cr =)�I 7 - r -• ••4,.1.,' ? W 41 1r 4 h rt F z x � i�f � `'�#',.:4-•-r.--s 4 r4 � �t r I x MAtdATE RO �+{ - ■Z R I.111�� 0 1 i 1 I 1 ��r• a Tom.,4 I Y'J'� �y12"n�^'r r �, C:—'k� D 1 W 'a -`;1 I _ •- - t "t,�Ej ,'' yJ+ t.: 6.1-% a e - Rid, 'Jy. y"-1�rr Avg,. I.i'�17i r a,'.. ` ,� --'i ','-.�fi 3.-. >� 3 0'I' °-=SA 61 rP' "Lit �� E--4.- .Y? I. I ri i ','r I y I_- _ t .ft m{^C''Y— ,_I 9.i _ I TIT r_.- -' •t l+1Ct'- Gulf "'` 'lt "- y r *"4_.k W1 '_ Yft �..�°�. Qy� SAND IPS-Q- i 1 5 'e s� Z •b� It r-' FT'i lF�, Of i • SHELLISy y�v-kt.',�r Hof _ Ni. ¢,i i�'o l itlit FH l +. . 7 Fa ry0 '1 ag_-+. 1 /'G�ty.71.-{I: `r 4-11' a;- i, =rr•,1. E. r`I exico 's.3 ., } ft � 9 x- te 5�r �� �� ' tr�- �`,1`:, " �Q 9�J ��_g}.�• j _ ..'e sr� d',, „% ,Ds. gRSH161,0,- PI-0. "' Xrr � I ILA fI +. N ,�.�. i i,.'i -�f�J / -- .i`''- � i� llld 1 I I•1 I�`; nom ' ¢ s. �. - _ hi.E: - -'-ail' - DILAWN ET DATE P.F. 12/2/13 FIGURE 1.PROJECT LOCATION MAP IEEA1EVEDIIY DATE PASSARELLA VINCENTIAN B.B. 12/2/13 I.tDg REVISED DATE ,� '°; & ASSOCIATE S • -M - _ _ d < OM co H rn N Z 0 r-` )0 In O O W W Zy �w op -{+ Z u u O oo �0 a.1 ow ouZ I ll `H W N O w J Z J Z U a_ as oa - _.0 as w, <, , F N 1--J Q H w.°v �o Qo w3 ruN wa ��-,y/, F Z w = m uo m u Na �" N� • Yw Erg h°�K Z l7 O O) Zm Zy Nry W2 N NfY W Z r J z J o° ou >�w o~ zF, as GI O 0 z. Q ¢ ° >. / �o Qa way °ow u Ya �S r^W Q o d J U Q Q +(f., u OU EuE 34' QN 6i fh CfJ J I- w 4 C co �I J/ U) ru °u8 wuo ow .6` wu 0 0 cc 0 U 0 r 1-w Kw0 w-,r. 05 J' KLL VJ, Z Q -I U W W m ~ ~W Z ,,C! 7 W m w 5 m u_ 11 IL IL w .. ZH Hw wH,. oG H off (/.�, W JL uLce 1—E. uw 7F� Zx ^J IPy *G I— c00 Qm 0. Z O V 0. .00 0O � l {Y}'} • • ® ® �I� Oz wT EIT'u aLL'n �� u0i1,E,9 gT o = O• j • • •• r• i,• i •• •• •• • • ••1. ':' •• . O 1.•'• •'• • • • • • • • •If 44 yy • 4 = ce i� i • • •.•• c M n • .AZ•' • • • ••• •••• • M • ' • • • _ • • r • ••' •••E • •• • r • • •• • • • •• so • t 1 i y •1 f • ¢�'• • • • • •• i A. • • $•• •••w 4.. • { r C ss 44 to 4• •• ••. • • • • •� ii ••• • N •• • • ••Il~ s� •• •• • w' :c*r•f1 • •• 1 • • If • • ••• 1• •• • s' • ••-s• F It • • • '1'•• •• • •• • ••• "I•,••••• ••`•- •y•• : • • • t' +, c • • • • • i •4 v :•p k f • • ••• . 11 • • •• • • •• •r:s ' „, f . •• • • • © m $ • • • ft • • • • •' •• -\L••f4.1 i ••• „s •••.\\(1 A r n., ,5 I Nil Z F. •�i • q- '• )--■ cn 2 W F- k -, r lz' .73 Q - • • ra trj G s p •. • z \, .1Li- .r, �+ • .\ c OD 4/VIS VaVeaVe V1NVS i- r"- ,e�•Q __:_____13 _._ • . •. •• 1 n' r {�� .//4- .. • ••• ..: • o — • / 1~,,t- s t_ )`• r' Ery+ •W `vim J JIJI f�II.---2• ' — U U I W 1— Li-at101d0HSAVe �� f/ a. lam; s o _,� J _4 Jam ,{ --_,,?,1— -- N I. l 1 Ly —✓ } J�lE— ' -�J'� am? ?[r � 1c \ jr_--..sse —'1ctrfr—_ ,:<--- ---"-.Li Q', . c) NV 7002,01•£IOZ/91/01-0XN dON NOIJ*001 53103d$031N3N090f]2 3tlO91j\53un Du∎$$7\2192\519\901Z99r ZI\ZI02\f -c, Cl) w� I �---a w 00 1 H W I Z w o N o a N N w W o Z N � U Z z u-1 c, o Z� Q ,, u N a z or W ? Nz = z'0 •CC GC C') z as 0 I (C 1 ■ O cC `G N N UJ o0 nl M t I r Z r-=.1 to is S� �P6 - i . I DJ-1 w _ . it•m 6 \ 2 O a = a a CC 0 Pi z n. J r a � ,w¢ Y S - :QA-19 VHV9HV9 V1NVS cc o OH NHVB AlNnoo (' L m (` li'-, `� ^ co .,.. myrrk .:_—_,),_,,,,,,, .1;_ei , .23, 7,,,,s-,A),p, 0 E, 1.11 cc �~ S .,/ •;+�� �a tie Wlbd ,•, j 2 S .. QHOHSAVB r� ' z lll��J t-... /='- --,--;:-----4 ty1 c'l '''. .. e-='---- • ■d 2£:90'2 d 7102/22/1-OIH'S3NOZ 831-111,Vd£3enOld\sian,ld\SSl\ZIOZ\SI9\BOIZSir2I\2102\',f N w Z W g 0I Onl O 0H0 �7V O N wwQ o,'S' f--)1 W I- N o W w a z�o_ 7 0 N W LL 0 r '‹ r Ol ZF-K V 0r• 0 3 N o�'of - O w o a N� r� C� u£ C) J o _ o wLLr Cl)z tL .r- ti o rr w ) w . . 3 0 3 p z o o — — — c 4 3 y. ZO J 0. 0. i- J w r w tr U O -o---. M O FW- o¢r°o 1L - .o .0 s0 z 3=3 �1 00 °1 — 08�, • • • N N .--1 1 ..\ -\ F 00 F CA N a N M M P in 4:, y "�+ n C in \ . : P , • I O rn •' O w U c=4 . ZC-D U) CD I s ° a v1\,, Q o i 1 t I �� V0r% Q °r°• W In i 111 - �- -- -- I Th - >1. 1..-.--.._ . " 7 ."7-'7 !..:7k,i'''':';.'',.';‘,1A44=',4"" ";.**ii.,'; , ,.,.a ea - -i.�,. _ Wd SS:fI Z @ 7102/ZZ/I-0xN'1.1 9-81 0NV S3W3L0od MHO'S 000M 7 3.191jMNIMttlO 010\S38OOld\SS,\ZIOZ\SI9\B01ZS0rZ 1\Z IOn:r ,-2*, ‘ 'i*-f P .. , ,N \ ',. 1 ' 2.1 ; • . } I'E:t°=201 ;i ` .f` "11;%■�C•"'• ` r R . / ."2...'., C` -• w `.. l' r•. ,tt -: .0, ,�.c.....1. } .'�• � * . - l�� DLO Vt # - Y' . 4t ♦ �r t, ,dab 2' r Crs ... N, e 1. ,. • as is•�O' ' •tl to t 44.1 .- . '" '�'-J '�..,,i ���, iv { R.Y r.+�,` �f \�,\•• ;���!' .. .Ct y -, a,.!` T a. �''s � •r,f ' a 4.• ,/'4• ? -` :•'• a. �k. 1 �i� J``�` A� ' '� ,yf �se to t f A `• ,`.•�"'T - ;4".,. tai �f /�� 4• Y x. . g•' �•/fw `'3.t'C.•,r p- . • . f ! • .'�R v b. ipisis. ,. ;4 aV fir , ry`^+.v. c ! '4: ,`. / , {-'' ." / • • s y /. d . -E �•4 .040` �!•► K�a ,f , N' • • "' - t c• r.. 1 ,}• ..w /w �.,. r / r "'tip. ,-)47 i l•. _ - jt l=. +�w[}T4Jr7t c•, < _ 6 v 4 Yr y.�,' • - 7-'4,', ' � � •+r •s e fir• -,.r.-1' -,ek.a !.f.t�• € r Y ` t w` o rry - 81. ' aS, `s yr^ _ Y. ° - ` - � 1 L ' r ' ' y� vysi .., e , ' h4 e .z / a eGl 0,-4> • : -,_`�, .!, ate• / �t • i• s_,/• x ,a.�S. t -ilw E. LEGEND: ..f, _. X `. w/3a-Orat .�:.. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF WALKED I w • r'.V.- : - _ ;, i.-} r _- �_ i TRANSECTS ` ., I v ■a NOTES: ALE _ ' -- ., wsD * 44', r = AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE ' ',7' aj+ {. • '' :4'7 ▪ COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH ' i ! �., — ' • �'•--'-. �• `-'+4! r j� A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2010. t r t ° y 3'? ' 3 PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER MARCO SURVEYING& a ' �_ • MAPPING LLC.DRAWING No.P092-VINCENTIAN-PUD_V4.owG ` `; 7 • ! . /'.�DATED MARCH 19,2012. F !y'9- ` ' _ H.H. 3/20/12 • FIGURE 5.AERIAL WITH SURVEY TRANSECTS BY DATE PAS SARE LLA VINCENTIAN B.B. 3/z�° 12 �°°� & Ass OCIATES EXHIBIT C CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES 9.3 RtoLI Zy! DIVISIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STP' ,.'C T«? STS.,, MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA CABINET O - Y :,- A'w Office of the Secretary «t' °. V ¢�; Historic Florida Keys Preservation Board Office of International Relations ' r' Historic Palm Beach County Preset vation Board Division of Administrative Services i Historic Pensacola Preservation Board aii%i.t,j .Y -tom=-z.: /� Division of Corporations Ca zi a _ Historic St.Augustine Preservation Board Division of Cultural Affairs s,:fir Division of Elections Historic Tallahassee Preservation Board �.cQ- ieu.• Historic County Division of Historical Resources •+,,•u•��•r,;i: 1- b 1 Division of Library and Information Services Preservation Boatd Division of Licensing FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Ringling Museum of Art Sandra B. Mortham (fit rt "".1 ^-� Secretary of State ' t DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES MAY 23 S May 18, 1998 Mr. Andrew Woodruff In Reply Refer To: Passarella and Associates, Inc. Robin D. Jackson 4575 Via Royale, Suite 104 Historic Site Specialist Fort Myers,Florida 33919 Project File No. 982363 RE: Cultural Resource Assessment Request • USACOE Nationwide Permit Vincentian Planned Unit Development Project No. 98RWA241 Collier, County,Florida Dear Mr. Woodruff /• ■ In accordance with the procedures contained in 36 C.F.R.,Part 800 ("Protection of Historic Properties"),we have reviewed the referenced project(s)for possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing,in the National Register of Historic Places. The authority for this procedure is the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665), as amended. A review of the Florida Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the project area. Furthermore,because of the project location and/or nature it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. Therefore,it is the opinion of this office that the proposed project will have no effect on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. If you have any questions concerning our comments,please do not hesitate to contact us. Your interest in protecting Florida's historic properties is appreciated. . Sincerely, --z_r.......4-,. a . /d.."14-11.4..A.4-c..4.— t"( George W. Percy,Director Division of Historical Resources and GWP/Jrj State Historic Preservation Officer Tr DIRECTOR'S OFFICE R.A.Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee,Florida 32399-0250 • (904)488-1480 FAX:(904)488-3353 • WWW Address http://www.dos.state.f.us ARCHAEOLOGICAL 22H ) PRESERVATION HISTORICAL (904) 99 • 4414- 07 (904) • FAX:922-04496 (04) FAX:921-2503 D®l›® w W N W ,• �P m r 'g rn m v Z N v--' • -I 71 D m O N Z m v ■0 rn C7 o 0 G) ° r Z r r -I C Z (71 w Z C) n O Z Z = -� Z D — Z m 0 w m °°rjni �•�ay m Z D : m . V—1 E M X m' a :U > c 'c`�K n m o xi m� -n n X OD (Ji 7) i i i N r N Z D - O-I rrr -0-Di m O m cn cn K m (f) \ C C n m .-- 05E • XI r- cn m y9rod m� 0 rn 0,1 C �C o m NZ c° Co { r D v PO 0 r c o C.R.'951 TI> u/ O N p `^' o rgl w m m 0 o A-, N N Iv N�oo.< .Z_7y V� . Z MM Y a CO■ > r .&'4 O z d, C.R.951 0 Or C.R.951 n C nm o X cn =o _■ — m <� � cp -Dorn C) — -n n � r • jn N Oj _.. . W Vn o0p. mopmpom C 2-1; COLLIER COUNTY FIRE 0 D m m z rn -i — moo co .F. > mcnor- rnD -omrr- 0 n e2N w wo I * MMC1 O m � m �gA zmzm -.1 # _ C � rn0mc 00 n° = = 0 "0 .13Z110 0 -1 C7 gy = Z � � 00 � � Cm m 1 A g _ M X � m Z n CD N9 9 0 mmm .- rm -di = Z cAis D0 � -im22 A Sig y 21111"."-011.1111"."-o N rnZ -< Oroo , m m �" $ 8 ? V" = N v -10 O 9 w m * my 0 -+ m T, ,?-j, __ v m i`' Z -c m EXHIBIT E-2 VINCENTIAN PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT Collier County Public Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs as well as wastewater service. The County has major water and wastewater transmission mains located along U.S. 41 and on Southwest Boulevard that are accessible to this property by means of connections and extensions of mains into the property. The County has sufficient capacity to provide Vincentian water and sewer service. The estimated potable water and wastewater requirements for Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict are as follows: Scenario 1 (190,000 SF retail, 57,500 office, and 100-room hotel) Potable Water 42,000 GPD (Peak 117 GPM) Wastewater 38,000 GPD (Peak 106 GPM) Scenario 2 (250,000 SF shopping center) Potable Water 28,000 GPD (Peak 78 GPM) Wastewater 25,000 GPD (Peak 69 GPM) Scenario 3 (122 dwelling units) Potable Water 36,600 GPD (Peak 100 GPM) Wastewater 30,500 GPD (Peak 83 GPM) According to the Collier County AUIR, currently there is a an existing landfill capacity of 18,359,127 tons, and a ten-year landfill capacity requirement of 2,305,407 tons, representing a surplus of 16,053,720 tons of landfill capacity. This is more than adequate to accommodate additional tons per capita disposal generated by the Vincentian Subdistrict. Stormwater retention and detention will comply with SFWMD requirements, and State and County standards for off-site discharges will be met, resulting in no adverse impacts to stormwater management (drainage) level of service. H:\2013\2013043\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Public Facilities Report 1-24-2014.docx EXHIBIT E-3 TrDDIICOCIi Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: Global Properties of Naples Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34103 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: (239) 289-3143 Phone: (239) 566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock @trebilcock.biz Vincentian PUDA - October 2013 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. f Norman J.T rebilcock,AICP, P.E. FL Registration No.47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2375 Tamiami Trail N,Suite 207 Naples, FL 34103 Company Cert.of Auth. No. 27796 2 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Table of Contents Page Project Description 4- 5 Trip Generation 6- 8 Trip Distribution and Assignment 9-11 Background Traffic 12-13 Existing and Future Roadway Network 14 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network--Roadway Link Analysis 15-16 Intersection/ Project Accesses -Turn Lanes Analysis 17-19 Improvement Analysis 19 Mitigation of Impact 19 Appendix A: Project Methodology Meeting Notes (5 Sheets) Appendix B: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations (3 Sheets) Appendix D: Internal—Pass-By Capture Exhibits (3 Sheets) Appendix E: Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) 3 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Project Description The Vincentian project is an existing approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) - Collier County Ord. 99-37 - and has a total site area of approximately 30.0 acres. The project site is located in east Naples, at the southwest corner of the intersection of Southwest Blvd. and Tamiami Trail East (US 41), and lies in Section 32, Township 505, Range 26E, Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1 - Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix B - Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1—Project Location Map - LOCATION MAP _ PROJECT - LOCATION The existing approved Vincentian PUD consists of three (3) uses: Retail –Shopping Center 57,500 sf; Office – General Office - 57,500 sf; Residential – Single Family Detached Housing–40 dwelling units. 4 Vincention PUDA TIS- October 2013 The proposed Vincentian PUD amendment (PUDA) will continue to be developed as a mixed use commercial project as follows: Scenario 1 e Retail — Shopping Center 190,000sf; Office — General Office — 57,500sf; Lodging — Hotel — 100 rooms; and Scenario 2 e to consist of a single use of Retail — Shopping Center 250,000sf. Vincentian PUDA TIS provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's trip generation. The development programs are illustrated in the Table 1. Table 1 ® Existing Approved Development Program Development Land Use Total Size ITE Land Use Code Build-Out Year Program Shopping Center 820 57,500 f r N/A Existing-Approved_ General Office 710 57,500 sf N/A POD SF Residential 210 _ .. 40 units; _ N/A Shopping Center 820 190,000 sf 2018 Proposed PUDA _General Office - 71Q _.57,000 sf 2 18 5 'f Scenario 1 •' Hotel 310 100 rooms 2018 Proposed PUDA ShopPing Center 820 250,000 sf 20I$ Scenario 2 The internal site circulation system proposes to connect to Southwest Blvd. and Tamiami Trail East. Refer to Appendix B s Project Master Site Plan. 5 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The software program Otiss— Online Traffic Impact Study Software (Version 3.0.0.137) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates (land use: hotel) and equations (land uses: shopping center, general office and single family residential) were used to generate the project trips. Trip reductions have been applied per ITE and Collier County guidance: internal capture trips— up to 20%, and pass-by trips— up to 25% for shopping center use. The proposed total project trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A—Scenario 1 (mixed-use) and Table 2B—Scenario 2 (single-use). The mixed-use scenario (Scenario 1) reveals more intensive PM peak hour 2-way values (PM Total to adjacent streets—851 trips). Table 2C shows the trip generation for the existing approved mixed-use project. Table 2D illustrates the net new proposed trips, and is determined as the difference between most intense proposed scenario (Table 2A—Scenario I) and approved existing project (Table 2C). More details of the trip generation calculations can be found in Appendix C-Trip Generation Calculations. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the internal capture trips should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. For this project, the software program Otiss was used to generate the internal capture trips. The Otiss process follows the trip balancing approach as recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition —Volume 1: User's Guide and Handbook, Chapter 7 - procedure for estimating multi-use trip generation internal capture aka "triangle method". The resulting internal capture rates are below the county limits. The detailed results of the internal capture and pass-by calculations can be found in Appendix D-internal/ Pass-by Capture Exhibits. 6 Vincentian PUDA T1S-October 2013 The pass-by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the pass-by capture for shopping centers (LUC 820) should not exceed 25% for the peak hour. The daily capture rate is assumed to be 10% lower than the peak hour rate. Table 2A—Proposed Scenario 1 Trip Generation ® Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour Way Volume Land Uses `Size = Enter Exit= L; Enter Ex 4 = Shopping Center 190,000sf 10,307 143 88 442 479 ;'general Q e` 57,500s ' 852 108 Hotel 100 occ.rooms 892 39 28 34 36 dotal driveway ._ '_ 12, 61 - _;F 131 _ µ:r.5.00 634. Internal Capture* -30 -30 Total External J ' Pass-By Trips** -106 -117 ':Total to aad�acent streets s,. .r__' 364 - 487" Notes: * - Internal Capture—up to 20%max; **- Pass-By Trips—up to 25%for shopping center. Table 2B--Proposed Scenario 2 Trip Generation ® Average Weekday 24 Hour Two- AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour Way Volume '[and Ilse t .Size ;f } Enter Y E Enter Exit Shopping Center 250,000sf 12,320 169 104 531 576 t°Pass By Trips* _ s r ,; 133 -1 ' Total to adjacent streets 398 432 Notes: *- Pass-By Trips—up to 25%. 7 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Table 2C—Existing Approved Project Trip Generation m Average Weekday I 1 `a Hour I I Two- AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour Way Volume Land Use - s Size; `Enter Exit Enter 3. Shopping Center 57,500 sf 4739 69 42 199 215 Gener l Off ice n.. 57,500 sf 862 : 108 15 24 SF Residential ._ 40 units 452 10 28 29 17 ToaDr *0. h C3 �� r ' 1 £ f ° s 0 ,_ 8 r 5r Internal Capture* -29 -29 223 Pass-By Trips** -46 -51 rTotal toadlacentstreets ' ' _ - Notes: *- Internal Capture—up to 20%max; ** -Pass-By Trips—up to 25%for shopping center. Table 2D—Net New Proposed Project Trip Generation — Average Weekday PM Pk Hour Devela� mend Exit _ Total p y� Proposed Scenario 1 Development 364 487 851 Existing Approved Development X77 271 -448 Net New Difference 187 216 403 The net new proposed trip generation shown in Table 2D reveals a net increase in the PM peak hour volumes, proposed conditions versus existing approved conditions. The Table 2D values are what will be used for the trip distribution and assignment in the roadway link analysis. The Table 2A–Scenario 1 –Total external values (PM – Enter–500 and PM – Exit–634) are to be used for the operational – intersection/site access turn lanes analysis. 8 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area, previously submitted study data and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. The net new proposed site-generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3—Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour, Peak Direction and is graphically depicted on the next page - Fig. 2---Project Distribution By Percentage and Fig. 3—Project Distribution By PM Peak Hour. Refer to Appendix B- Project Master Site Plan. Table 3—Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour, Peak Direction CC Distribution PM Peak Hr Project AUIR Traffic Volume Roadway Link Link Roadway Link Location of Project Traffic Enter Exit ID# US 41 92 0 Airport Rd.to Rattlesnake 35% 66 76 Hammock Rd. Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. US 41 33 0. 50% 94 108 = to St.Andrews Blvd US 41 93.0 St.Andrews Blvd.to 60% 112 130 Project US 41 930: Project to Triangle Blvd 35% ` 7. 66 76 US 41 94.0 Triangle Blvd.to Collier 25% 47 54 Blvd. Thomasson;Dr 108.0 Bayshore D'i a US 41 _10%.''' 19 _22 Rattlesnake 72 0 US 41 to Charlemagne 5% 9 10 Hammock Rd. Blvd. Southwest Blvd* N/A Corso Bello Dr.to Project;: 5% 9 1a Collier Blvd. 35.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 15% 28 32 to US 41 US 41 to V1lal Mart Collier Blvd 36 1' 10% 19 l 22 Driveway Notes: *- Not a CC AUIR monitored roadway facility. 9 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Fig. 2—Project Distribution By Percentage ; "45' ice$. xdA ti air.^t 2596 ABS:5% - PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION LABS. 5%1 35% BY PERCENTAGE F fer :l 10% 50% - ABS. 5% ABS. 5% i'-'} Nar,s 60% Nii 35% WO 1,64.- ABS 5% p –'' 1- 4-25% ,., 15% PROJECT lABS. 5%1 4,' ' LOCATION NOTE 1096 ABS.=ABSORPTION 10 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Fig. 3—Project Distribution By PM Peak Hour • • --._ .... . t4:1 ..::3 4... 4.-124:) - :,.. c ' ..-"...,4,-.•.,-..,,_i 1 "4 4: - „ , t „ ., . • . . : PROJECT TRIP -,, . - NB=76; SB= 661 --' DISTRIBUTION , . lAIE3= 22; EB= 19 I NI . : BY PM PK HR 44. E3'..r o•—I '-', - WE3= 9; EE3= 10 I NI Lf•of . - • NB=108; SE3= 94 '-'-'• '.•.„„_st • ''. 8 - .- INE3=130; SB=1121_ . . -..-- .myei •• .111V, -• ...-.. ., , lety,R.IVAit :' • • ,--,,- . 1NB =66 SE = 76., 1 WE= 10; EB= 9 2t NB47;--' S BE== 541 N32 SB= 28 . •,, - ` PROJECT :..' • LOCATION 71 • - • . • NB= 19 _ . • . . --- SB= 22 t, . . .. • / . 1 i Vincentian PUDA 6S e tctober 2013 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Transportation Planning Staff Guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical rate derived from Collier County annual traffic counts (estimated from 2008 thru 2012), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2013 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. For this project, the controlling (highest) volume is the AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4 e Background Traffic without Project, illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the year 2018 —see next page. 12 Vincentian PUDA TIS-October 2013 -Table 4—Background liraffic without Project. (2013-2018) 2013 AUIR Projected 2018 Projected CC Peak Hr, Traffic Peak Hr,Peak Dir Roadway Link AUIR Roadway Link Peak Dir Annual Trip Growth Background Link Location Background Growth Bank Factor Traffic Volume ID# Traffic Vol Rate w/out Project (trips/hr) (%/yr) (trips/hr) AirportRd to • US 41. 920 Rattlesnake Hamçnocic 2,170(SB)-:=," .-•;t320 • Rd;,.-„, . - . , _ _ . , . - . . ,■11 Rattlesnake Hammock US 41 93.0 Rd.to St.Andrews 1,980(SB) 3.0% 577 1.1593 2,557 Blvd. StAndrews Blvd to - - US/41:2:4::;:yR ,t980:,(SB) :Y;; 3 0% 517 1 1593 2,557 Project to Triangle US 41 93.0 1,980(SB) 3.0% 577 1.1593 2,557 Blvd. Blvd.-to- - - - 1,310(SB) - - =_533 -_-1,1041.: . collier . Thomasson Bayshore Dr.to US 41 108.0 420(EB) 2.0% 105 1.1041 525 Rattlesnake 7 0 .1'!'1-;650 i.,(W = - - Southwest N/A Corso Bello Dr.to N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Collier Blvd - 35 0 Blvd.* Project RattlOsnaktialnraok ,r- ' : 1;420.04p1-- . zoyo. us 41 to Wal-Mart Collier Blvd. 36.1 1,820(NB) 2.0% 723 1.1041 2,543 Driveway Table Note: Growth Rate=from 2008 to 2012 CC traffic count data,or 2%,whichever is greater.Growth Factor=(1+Annual Growth Rate)^5. 2018 Projected Volume=2013 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor,or 2013 AUIR+Trip Bank,whichever is greater. N/A=not applicable,not available.Note*-Not a CC AUIR monitored roadway facility. 13 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Existing and Future Roadway Network - The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2012 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and the 2018 roadway conditions are based on the current FDOT and Collier County 5 Year Work Program. The roadways evaluated are anticipated to remain the same thru 2018. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5 o Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5—Existing and Future Roadway Conditions CC Exist Peak AUIR Exist Future Roadway Link Roadway Link Location Exist Min LOS Dir,Peak Hr 2018 Link Roadway Std Capacity Roadway# Volume y 5 <. ,4irpott Rd to Rattlesnake S41 92.0 6D.- E 2,90Q .01.34 = Hammock Rd. -' . US 41 93.0 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 6D E 3,000 6D to St.Andrews Blvd. St Andrews Blvd to s x US 41 93 0 .P-ro�ect_!- E F 3;QQ0 6� US 41 93.0 Project to Triangle Blvd. 6D E 3,000 6D US 41 94.0 ,-Triangle Blvd to Collier Blvd . 6D E 3;000 '6D Thomasson Dr. 105.0 Bayshore Dr.to US 41. 2U D 800 2U Rattlesnake US41to Charlemagne Hammock Rd 72 fl Byrd 4D D 1;$00 .rye 4 Southwest Corso Bello Dr.to Project N/A 2U N/A °00 2U y^ Blvd.* ° Collier Blvd. 35.p, Rattlesnake Hammock.Rd to-US 41 6D E 3,20Q `6D Collier Blvd. 36.1 US 41 to Wal-Mart 6D E 2,500 6D Driveway Table Notes: 2U=2-lane undivided roadway;4D, 6D=4-lane, 6-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS =Level of Service. N/A=not applicable, not available.Note*-Not a CC AUIR monitored roadway facility.Southwest Blvd.road service volume is assumed similar to Shadowlawn Dr. —CC AUIR ID#144. 14 Vincention PUDA TIS s October 2013 Project Impacts tv Area •oadway Network--Roadway Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future (2018). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link adjacent to the project; 3%for other links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. The project PM peak hour volumes are added to the network volumes to coincide with the network peak time and peak direction. Table 6— Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. None of the adjacent links are projected to be operating below the adopted level of service with, or without the project. Although the percentage volume capacity exceeds County thresholds for some of the roadway links, the roadway facilities are projected to operate within the adopted LOS and therefore in an effective and efficient manner. Based on these criteria, this project creates significant, but not adverse impacts to the area roadway network. 15 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 ..--, • Table 6—Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS)—With Project in the Year 2018 n a o 2028 LIJ.LO CC Link %Vol Min LOS Min LOS CC Peak Peak Peak Dir Cap. exceeded exceeded AUIR Roadway Link Dir, Dir, Roadway Link (Project Impact without with Link Location Peak Hr Peak Hr Vol Vol.w/ By Project? Project? ID# Cap. Added) Project Yes/No Yes/No Vol. Project Airp&t Rd to US 41-,-. •--;.:,. :92:.0.:i---=14ttleSnke-Hamnicckl LA901I;',-,-,,,47:P.'166-- -: - 2,556 2 3% :.-)':.21■119-: -i-4:- .:.?...,,..'if:Nkl,- ,.. Rd Rattlesnake Hammock US 41 93.0 Rd.to St.Andrews 3,000 94 2,651 3.1% No No Blvd. St.Andrews Bhidtb '-.-- - — U541--"--'-::::-.1 ., 43.0 - --- ' "-, •Project - -- --•-•------'' -, 3,000 - '1112- _ -.,•-2,`669 - - 33% _ _ _,No.,,,-, .,:,,.'esso--,. Project to Triangle US 41 93.0 Blvd. 3,000 76 2,633 2.5% No No _,..-:' ---.Tri.angler,B.,19thIct--;.:-.4-i--_-.}- US 41 -= --- -:94.01: Collier"-',:-- ..-'--.-'-- r--J`--666---1( :.54 --.'• 1,897 s'-1:8%- - . No = ---- --- No .2--- - -- - -— - - :'. : olsitt.,-:-.,i1.-.:,,,z --_=_-- : 4.-,:_z_,.-. : :. _ . , ,.. Bayshore Dr.to US 41 ..---....,11 Thomasson Dr. 108.0 800 19 544 2.4% No No .'...rRr.;•ii..=tieS.,i..4ik.,',...e,2_,-:-. g:e;-,i:s: - -7.:3,--ti-US-i Act h....,..4r mawkeW2V p1,:'s,.;, I3,-03'--'-2-_ 9 ,,-7 59- 2 1- =, 0.5'%- N-O Hammock Rd. . i- 4 .,. BwtT , -.... •; '' .--"_ '-' i'-'- -'- , --, .-'_-.--_ ;-':-1.- '-.-::4,:=•+:',;'i',..,..:4;,- Southwest Corso Bello Dr.to Blvd.* N/A Project 800 10 N/A 1.3% No No Rattlesnake Hàmrriock:.. Collier ,.....:B,.....li.-„& R;;;; 166-..:-1.-ir.!y1..-4:,_,..-4i.46....;:4-.,41 '32c?.-K.Z::4:AA4309 Az . . 1,958 10% : NO ; - No - =- -•;:,..Y.-41-.,..';`-".;:....", -:.' ',----,:-..--_-. ,..,,re. -,L"-; -, .‘ .;.:-:';,:-;::;....--",,,;:c.1,-..1.::-!.:7-1- :.'_,-:_m ' US 41 to Wal-Mart Collier Blvd. 36.1 Driveway 2,500 19 2,562 0.8% No No Table Notes: N/A=not applicable,not available.Note*-Not a CC AUIR monitored roadway facility. Southwest Blvd. road capacity is assumed similar to Shadowlawn Dr. -CC AUIR ID#144. I...ft\ 16 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Intersection/ Project Accesses o Turn Ian- Analysis The Vincentian PUDA project proposes 3 accesses as follows: two access points off of Southwest Blvd. — Entrances #1 &#2—full movement accesses, and one access point off of US41—Tamiami Trail East-- Entrance#3 - right in / right out access. Refer to Appendix B - Project Master Site Plan. Tamiami Trail East (US 41) is under Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Collier County jurisdiction and it is currently a north-south six-lane two-way urban arterial roadway and has a posted legal speed limit of 55 mph in the vicinity of project. Based on FDOT Index 301 (design speed of 55mph), the minimum turn lane length is 350ft (which includes a 50 ft taper) plus required queue. Southwest Boulevard is a two lane west-east undivided local roadway under Collier County jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 25mph in the vicinity of project. Based on FDOT Index 301 (design speed of 35 mph), the minimum turn lane length is 145ft (which includes a 50ft taper) plus required queue. Project accesses were evaluated for turn lane warrants based on Collier County Right-Of-Way Ordinance #2003-37: a) two-lane roadways - 40vph for right turn lane/20vph for left turn lane; b) multi-lane divided roadways - turn lanes shall always be provided. US 41 - St. Southwest Blvd.—Unsignalized Intersection The intersection of Southwest Blvd. and US41 is located in the proximity of the project. There is no operating traffic control signal at the intersection at this time, but it is under design by others. EB Southwest Blvd. approach provides one left-turn lane and one through/right- turn lane (+1- 320ft). Eastbound exiting volume may warrant a double left turn lane, if combined with future background traffic. 17 Vincentian PUDA TIS a October 2013 SB US41 approach provides one right-turn lane (+/- 475ft) and one left-turn lane (+1- 350ft). NB US41 approach has one right-turn lane (+1- 550ft) and one left-turn lane. The existing turn lanes on US 41 serving the intersection will accommodate the operational needs of the project for both deceleration and stacking. Refer to Appendix E—Turning Movements Exhibits. This intersection may require modifications, which will be determined at the time of final development order review. Project Accesses—Turn Lanes Minimum turn lane lengths required at project build out conditions were analyzed based on number of turning vehicles in an average of 1-minute period (for right turns) and 2-minute period (for left turn), within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue/vehicle considered is 25ft. A more detailed evaluation of the turn lanes for project access points would be implemented at the time of proposed development plan design and permitting, as applicable. Entrance#1 m EB Southwest Blvd. EB Right Turn Lane—The project is expected to generate 25 right turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive right turn is not warranted. WB Left Turn Lane —The project is expected to generate 25 left turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive left turn is warranted and it is recommended to be 170ft in length, at the minimum. Entrance #2— EB Southwest Blvd. WB Left Turn Lane—The project is expected to generate 200 left turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive left turn is warranted and it is recommended to be 320ft in length, at the minimum. 18 Vincentian PUDA TIS s October 2013 Entrance #3 °SB US 41 c�a Right Turn i ane—The project is expected to generate 250 right turns during the PM peak hour. Therefore, an exclusive right turn is warranted and it is recommended to be 475ft in length, at the minimum. Improvement Analysis The project impacts to the Collier County roadway network are significant but are not adverse. Based on the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project is a significant traffic generator to this location. Empirically, the project is estimated to create a significant delay at Southwest Blvd. and US41 intersection that may warrant modifying the turn lane configuration geometry (additional turn lane) and/or installation of operating control signals that would improve service level. The recommended offsite improvements will be permitted and approved through the development order process. Mitigation of Impact The developer will provide appropriate mitigation and commitments as listed in the revised Planned Unit Development (PUD) document, in order to aid transportation improvements, as applicable. 19 Vincentian PUDA TIS-October 2013 Appendix A: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (5 Sheets) 20 Vincention PUDA TIS-October 2013 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:October 11.2013 Time: N/A Location:Collier County Development Services People Attending: Name,Organization,and Telephone Numbers 1) Reed Jarvi.CC Growth Mgmt Div 2) John Podzerwinskv.CC Growth Mgmt Div 3) Robert Mulhere.Mulhere&Associates 4) Norman Trebilcock..TCS Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title:Norman.Trebilcock Organization:Trebilcock Consulting Solutions Address&Telephone Number. 1205 Piper Boulevard_ Suite 202.Naples. Fl 34110:ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title:John Podczerwinskv.Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization&Telephone Number:CC Growth Mgmt Division:239-252-5890 Applicant: Applicant's Name:Global Properties of Naples(Christopher Shucart) Address: 2614 Tatniami Trail North.Suite 615.Naples.FL 34103 Telephone Number:(239)289-3143 • Proposed Development: Name: Viticentian PUDA Location: corner of US 41 and Southwest Blvd—East Naples.FL Land Use Type: General Office.Hotel,and Shopping Center ITE Code #: 710 (General Office): 310 (Lodging– Hotel): 820 (Retail –Shopping Center) Proposed number of development units: General Office 57.5 ksf; Hotel 100 rooms: Retail-Shopping Center—190ksf Existing approved conditions: General Office 57.5ksf: Shopping Center — 57.5ksf: Single Family Residential–40 dwelling units. Page 1of5 21 Vincentian PUDA TIS-October 2013 Description: Eliminating Single Family Residential. Creating mixed use commercial project General office remains the same (Oaf additional). Hotel is added (104 rooms). and Retail is expanded(Shopping Center-132.5ksf additional). Zoning Existing:PUD residential,office and retail are allowed uses. Comprehensive plan recommendation:N/A Requested:PUD amendment other uses to be added and expandecL as applicable. Findings of the Preliminary Study: Significance Test-2%/2;'o/3% The project generates more than 100 net new total 2-way AM or PM peak hour trips and significantly impacts one or more roadway facilities. Study: Roadway Link Concurrence—based on net new trips. Operational intersection/ site access turn-lane analyses—based on total external project trips. Study Tyne:. Small Scale 115 ❑ Minor TIS ❑ s Major TIS ® Study Area: Boundaries:Southwest Blvd. US 41.Collier Blvd..Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. Additional intersections to be analyzed:US 41 and Southwest Blvd. Build Out/Planning Horizon Yea(s):2018 Use 2013 CC AUIR Analysis Time.Period(s):PM Pk Hr Future Off-Site Developments:N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates:ITE LUC Data—ITE 9th Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None:N/A Pass-by trips:Per 1TE.CC Guidance.up to 25%for shopping center. Internal trips(PUD):Per ITE.CC Guidance.up to 20%maximum. Transit use:N/A Other: Net impact proposed minus existing approved(57.5 ksf general ofc. 57.5 retail. and 40 single family). Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2018 Page 2 of 5 22 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Method°loass&Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates:2013 CC NUM Site-trip generation:Otiss Software-ITE 9 Edition Trip distribution method:Exuaineer's Estimate-,Vitt. 1 consistent with approved 2008 TIS Traffic assigninent method:project trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate:annual historical growth rate or 2%minimum Additional Notes: 1. 100%of project trips for access points and any necessary signal analyses (as applicablel. 2. Only net new trips for policy 5.1 (trartsp„ element), consistency(fink distribution). Fig. 1-Project Trip Distribution by Percentage r--1-‘%■ ,, ABS 5% PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION IA BS 5%1 EEO BY PERCENTAGE C7-] • 10% 50%k • , • 4 'ABS.5%] ABS 5% KO% "oki 1&,....,:1A11.9657.1.4/15,161 PROJECT 'ABS.5%1 It4 LOCATION -NOTE: 10% ABS.=ABSORPTION1 Page 3a 5 )3 VIncentian PUDA TIS s October 2013 I Special Features:(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations:NIA . Sight distance:WA Queuing:1/A Access location&configuration:US41_Southwest Blvd coordinate with FDOT on US41 Traffic control:MUTCD Signal systelii location&progression needs:Niel On-site parking needs:per CC',DC Data Sources:ITE Trip Gen.:2013 CC AUIR:CCTraffic Counts . Base maps:N1A Prior study reports:N/A Access policy and jurisdiction:CC/MOT Review process:PUDA Requirements:NiA Miscellaneous:N/A Small Scale Study—No Fee— Minor Study-$730.00 Major Study-$1300.00 x Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections-$300.00 each All,fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign-off on the application. SIGNATURES Study Prepares Reviewers Applicant Page 4 of 5 24 Vincentian PUDA TIS-October 2013 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review,Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review-$500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology„ statement,including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County,if needed. "Small Scale Study"Review-No Additional Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study.The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation,distribution and maximum threshold.compliance. "Minor Study Review"-$750 Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes:optional field visit to site,confirmation of trip generation,distribution,and assignment,concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way,review of site access and circulation,and preparation and review of"sufficiency"comments/questions. "Manor Study Review"-$1,500 Fee(Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip- length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements,review of traffic volume data collected/assembled,review of traffic growth analysis,review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis,review of site access and circulation,neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates,and preparation and review t. of up to two rounds of"sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review"-$500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the"Major Study Review"and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the"Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews"-$500 Fee) Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review.. Page 5 of 5 25 Vincentian PUDA TIS-October 2013 Appendix B: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) "~ 26 Iiincention PUDA TIS- October 2013 1 , , f WI-PSILER,S COW. PLID - COWER COUNTY PROPERTY A-7.0NING \ 1 7---:'---'r--'-'.- --- -- C-3-ZONIIIrS , 0. ' ZONIM ' -i ENTRANCE 1.31 1 1 I \- \\ RITCHIW.3 POST tIC.EILE ii E ' - 1 1 ENTRAKE c2.1 ,, TRAIL ACRES ', i I ,,,. .. it ';‘,,,,„\ REP-4 ZCNIII; ' I I f.,, - ' I 1. ., ‘ 1 I 1:.:At.1- 0 1- ...- ----- ,i i(. ..., . I." ti;‘,, is„ /I/ ', f/a,VR',E5 „_..„. ,-- - ' ,-- — , ' 1ENTRANCE 01 ' .-1 i --- :./.../ / ■ - i i•- ' .., . I " - . ! i , ,.... .„ .. ... . ; I 1 Il :::::::.._ , ,. .1/ : _ ..., .....„.„- ..,. „.,. ------ ...., I I L. TRA,"..-T - 1 _ ---__,..__ __ f ,..s.-3,Aa.ts , .........: . ...... . :. , ',..ty' ! f ----..........._ . . :: • ,::-.,z_.4,,,,,,,t) , • 1 ---.- ... ... . . . . . . . .. ....‘7.106 ' f • ----- ---------.. J ! k . , . . . 1 TRAIL ACRES I . RSF2 ZONING ,.. ,......, 27 Vincentticiri PUDA TIS- October 2013 Appendix C: ITE Trip Gener ti• n Calculations (9th Edition) (3 Sheets) 28 Vincentian PUDA TIS-October 2013 1 Project Name: VincentianPrUD-ApprovedCond. No: I Date: 10/972013 City: State/Province: ZiplPostal Code: Country: Client Name: analy'st's Name: Edition: 991 1 ! Daily dM.Peak Hour ! PM Peak Hour Land Use - Size t Exit i Entry Exit I Entry Exit Entry 11 I 820-Shopping Center i 57.5 n7 I 2370 I 2369 69 42 199 215 Reduction 0 1 0 0 I 0 0 0 internal / 151. 1 140 1 7 4 13 I 15 ! Pass-by. I 328 1 335 I 16 l 9 46 1 51 Non-pats-by [ 1861 1894 46 I 29 140 149 710-General Office 57.5 rc) 431 . 1 439 10.8 I 15 24 1 119 i '..„;, s Building : 1 Reduction 0 ■ 0 0 0 j 0 i 0' internal ' 65 I 102 1 1 t 8 5 Pass-by i 0 ! !0 0. Q 0 ! 0 I { i 1.8 114 NorrFass by 366 329 907 14 210-Single-Family t 40(3 226 1 X26. 10 1 28 29 17 Detached Housing. t Reduction ( 0 0 0 0 9 10 I__ internal # ! 82 1 es 3 ! 6 1 pass-by ! ! 0 1 i7 0 0 0 I 0 144 i 140 7 22" 19 6 von pass by i i 9 - Total j 3027 1 3026 f 187 85 252 351 Total Reduction 1 0 1 0 1 0 i p 0 j 0. i' ! r Total Internal j{ 328 328 1 11 11 29 29 t TotalPass-by 328 1 335 ; 16 9 46 51 2363 / 160 I 65 Total Non-oast-by j 2371 i 177 271 I............ (1) 1000 Sq.Feet Gross ieasablle Area i (2) WO Sq.Feet Grosss Floor Atea (3) Dvefling Units f r� 29 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 1 , .II: Project Name: Vincentian PUD-Prop.Cond.- No: 1 ' Scenario-1 Date: 10/9/2013 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name; f Analyst's Name: Edition: 9th l Daily 1 AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour Land Use 1 Size t i Entry Exit Entry 1 1 Exit Entry I Exit , : 820-Shopping Center 1 190 0 5154 t 5153 143 i 88 i 442 I 479 1 Reduction 0 0 0 # 0 1 0 0 interne) ' 130 136 9 1 8 3 18 1 12 t Pass-by ; 746 7.53 1 34 1 20. )f 106 117 Non-pass-by 4228 i 4264. 100 1 1 60 i 318 359 710-General Office ! 57.5 a> 431 431 108 i 1 15 tit 24 Building I I 119 Reduction I 0 a ( 0 0 I 0 0 internal i 65 ? 95 i 3 3 7 9 Pass by 1 I '0 i 0 0 j 0 0 0 t Non-pass-by 1 366 1 336 l 105 I 12 1 17 I 110 310-Hotel i 100 0 446 446 {{1 39 i 28 1 34. .36 Reduction 0 0 iti 0 j 0 0 i 0 Internal 71 85 f 5 i 5 i 5 1 9 I �1 Pass-by 0 0 j 0 i 0 0 0 Non-pass-by C 375 361 34 22 29 -27 Total 6031 i 6030 j 290 1 131 j 500 I 631 Total Reduction i 0 I 0 1 0 's 0 0 1 0 Total internal 7 316 316 I 17 17 1 30 I 30 Total Past-by y I 746' 753 t 34 I 20 1 106 1 117 Total Non-pass-by 1 4969 ; 4961 1 239 1 94. 1 364 1 487 J (1) /000 Sq.Feet Gross Leasable Area (2) 1007 Sq Feet Gross Floor Area (3) Occupied Rooms --i 30 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 l Project Name: Vincentian PUD—Prop.Conti.- No: Scenario 2 i Date:. 1019/2013 City: s Stafe/Province; Zip/Postal Code: { Country: Client Name: I Analyst's Name: Edition: 9th Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size I Entry 1 Exit I Entry I Exit Entry I Exit '• 820—Shopping Center^.I 250 n) 6160 6.160 I 169 I 104 ; 531 s 576 i-- Reduction I 0 0 0 0 0 0 internal { i 0 0 i 0 ff 0 ( 0 0 i ! Pass-by i 924 924 I 42 I 25 I 133 ; 144 Non-pass-by ; ----II 5236 5236 I 127 I 78 398 { 432 Total i 6160 6160 169 i 104 I 531 I 576 r Total Reduction ' { 0 0 1 0 ( 0 0 i 0 Total Internal 1 0 i 0 I 0 i 0 7 I 0 1 Total Pass-by 924 924 } 42 { 26. 133 I 144 Pass-by Total Non-pass-by y 5236 5236 i 127 ? 73 I 393 I 432 1 '• (1) 1000 Sq.Feel Gross Leasable Area s f 31 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 Appendix D: Internal — Pass-by Capture Exhibits (3 Sheets).. 32 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 . . , . i . I I Led Ilm 7,..1...,_. -A it...aft:10ft Mos ro-mrs'Eal Lict.:1 lEntry tat L.Ist I Ck E20.1.,,-. rp: 1, ;',17,;■:`,4.,,t1.1,.-71.1.4 57.5 71.4 fi,:•574 -P-e;72-7W3:4„4 Fi•---47-,t1.1.-OT.J14;4 : tx.,,T,..:c,-....“,.....)•g.:1 199 ns 414 , , . :,710-.0-:t.:1,..0111-1 VA:i'-4 iii-6.;57.0.a...ii.;.:.,:-,1,--i 57-5 I1F1-4TOW.1-71.777E-E-1,-,■;1; fri I iil..“1--Kt--q:4 t , 7=I igi5,;...73 05 21 152 705 ' I a, ,,,,,6,..a 1 LEM=0:1-0=X1•0 51 22 lg 43 1 • . I I R 4E11.17'45M' • 54.,0".'"y.,,,,001-.0E-r,ki4tit.VItri,r4a r'd E.1-Cp nd egmlur.,a:',..zwtsglogUI.,.1"7-"•6-10;9,oir,r,sr,4 It.:c,av sq.,r-i k-:-..*T 3 t-o•0,-7.M..1.77-uvin:o rt=c,1-00,ocr_...tga' 0-nizr.t.,CMS, . i . 1 1.4177111ii EnciytterkthOcel AcifoolOsEriry Eg11.1•EstmlOcn aditotea Exit . 323-sw.nOrftz,,,, :0 . 101 0 *. 215 I 719.(4,,r,4+;'“f■cx 0.1/1=5., I .----, I 1 C07,31 4.1,-.■7:1..,30::0 V•r9,IOE 7771.7017 7,15,45.77=771-t•Eg4 r,,,E.t,or.q.nth LE h..,t-,,n 1,,,,,,,1 1,11 4.,..,,1 I T.-. ,,t,,Lh ts,4 V., 41.,d•o•,•ei=.010.1,1...ii,...stl Enry 7,--p,..7 5=4 14•s,,,,n 117t p...,C.,,,4..7Q,,-...1 ere rt.t,a,u'irA tho. •,...-.11..,.,r-..:.•=x--,,,,,O,th'.1,,-0,,E.IE.:,:. :, tS2.L... .....■ : i I I I V.11.5.101.17kolto077( 711.1.Gro.J01`11,7e2,73Oio3 - Exit 21.5 0.=.n•Es2r rig,"31 33'I*3 OE res-,S3r.,-,7;31-:=1 271 3,33 20 I i• , 15131 1E9 17,g=g1173,,-,Irl.74) 5.900,35.1 EI-","o3E.,.., I,29:.5 3271 Egg 125 I 1 I i ail-vwstths C'.,,d 210.510511.55.17,/,0 Elacheit liaosinq I 7 r"—"■ Enil 215 OE.m1 t 12.11t(251 22f....02 5: 1 0.,., 43132 I;7171."...7) E./ fr.te, Ertl,/ lEA O.51.",-,1E:=1,,...;1--...1,.oz.) as..., s o.,:.slil tr.:, :',',31-•,,SL1 Eric 17 1 _ 1 de-GOOOIN 227I409 Mil:OM , 210-gralt.5.7iliOf oetached ii;g4kw I 1 Et 110 OI,A=r14-0k 57,...pt f7:1 34 42.5,5' 1 .q..,,,And;:sfr,..: 117:1 01 Eno./ 11-7 1 i&Or/ 2/ C.,•,,g V=7 Orgy'.!O %M.) 3 4,,•0 De 1.cdM:.-t 5-21.i7) EtrA ti , I I 1 • 1 QM.5.1•271,077.3 Centir I , 221,1014 52200 - L.- 1 , 79.Lerora1Otictliolden0 1 iic.s.,,,.. 322,1014 333) 1 1 1 Esit 215 OS") '.._ 51:1.151 , 935 I 153%) 3,33%I -"st ''1 1 ....-.-—___- I I : / 7/0-Central Clam Oulk.ang I 1 Toftl kips Irtgr02112Ep0 EAR-n.141E. I 0 ze•Shopping Cirri. I r.'217.07.44`47.".`"d I Totel 1 1 I oomin., -------FitTiFii-----!-------- -----------±"---------- --------'.---1:Tiiii------E--------31375%? ------ ' 1 I Rig 17 91.1051.51 1 ....t7,1•1 1(13) 1 SEE's) I_ 114(56.1) .. : 2'19-.tpilgt..F.a4V Octathes liausi rig 1 1 'i -...-. O.0r 9C•0ol 2 Gotta ,1---7-0.G-to-mm-mu*l 7.T1,a0 p7 s Tsitp , --.--__- ' _ Ouild-so-1 ---l-oa-f.--_--1 Eicn1 Tloa * T - _ I , I ! ; 9,Sig.1 I 0,O=.) i 1•5.77,4 9,07.1,) -- . 1 I E:7770421 44, 4=grit., 15,.,1 0,P k.--Of 7,1175.-1.11e11..gylIJ7e.t Ix r,v0e,,ag,=l Lf r,,,,..21 won On 1014 re,,,I05:015=1,-84I gtor.Egg r.,,g,t,id.t,..-5_,===To re..-,d.1r,re.e5.0i,g1 .4427.1•022E.,. I ET,V•:,..,m c-77.,-..F.O,7.Jo.;...,--O',..:o47 kg;1'17.1 Ng,I1E1I-,,.....332122'41,,:,-,.1...)tr.,,,,,.."F,22-37.'SIM i I 1.996, E0.1 wow Edo innot.1.0/1. Paslo Teirs 110139221123)21329 1 On-SE:non],"err,r 377 7-I 7,-'. :77( 74.73 v0_ : I 232.O. .r92212333'45333 12.2 0 -.3 9 102 .10•_,77c 17„./,s,,,,,_4, 25 0 7, a . , . _ 33 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013 .......... , p,,,w.,- ,,,.„,Ila Pip 7111,•17,1.•74••.0.1ai 1' ..0..1,11s II,ar 147Fia1.13;104. 1"- --1-11 1 1 1, tan:00. 174,5*,0st;01E41:2 TIM al,:Piir AS Za1/164 ,7-..i.,, Er"i i•-.711 i i.11'0.10,:llavr.ratrat, /0050'::111•10•0/s.tza ,70 1.1:1;711:1-4:1c#,Tivai i'7;tiTi GZiii7-4.06:7••••;V !,:.............,-,....--,,, 11 t . L(1;00 51_•;.../.1 7 31 4-0 ON 1 1 1•,\777•r7antr.ir.,•.7•111r; ra--0 73;4-7 r71:1-.F•a-a-TA 57:5 p;.;4..-7...zi-iF6.74,_ fir;i:iiiiii3.7.-L:i,gt 1 - I r 14,;V•rialel 11:11 .7 t!'•.„,rt•r".._if i •57. FEFI.F.T41.117:17E. i ii;;;;;;----1.0 0 1. 1 . •:‘.7 r. 7) I I 1• • ______ __________ ----a • 1. 1 1 trarify a 7e0ta7.4••.;r•/tirfaa 7,04 0,,.;,i-E•1.74 1.:11.II,..a.4;:ca:fv.•,-.1 laa I tita.%0-trara'aita 0177.7.,11.,7..graki 7:7,..4E,11-4-1,0t,0,-,:i.,:a.±-;...:ri ltedd,e..,..-ft:',-AJZ t i 11,,,,,;.t.st, 1 1 1,e-rattrt 9.-0.".;77o0;&:• 1 ), Ertra.r4,E7.0 .-477;104Z,1 1 -.. I i 720.710011.1.5C•rfir a_,^, -•-•"; 4 1 rr#4' ill t - . r•-,-.:: 1 vo•111W '01 .5 /t F.-N .z..1 1 - i . I 1 t.'prit.,.f 0,,,t,,,,,,t-47.4...t,....ht,,,,,,t,u-1 tr,..,,,th,,it.,,t■a aaa a've,7seita.110 Lnt.te:arra 40.0'a In 1.....v:Tank:$aiar 0-110ar,t7t a ra;r0•4 0.a..4 c.i*Ktt La.tar;07,77.t,'St,,,,,r,i.:,,,t,T.,,,f.1.,,,;•,1,•40.• I 1 *I a.raialtr -d00.•t•7 S.1,41,1,Vt$ .ta."4■...Ta.0,0,1.01.acis...e.eK m :..dr4+e 7,4,•-famty.it2:arr.;net!lot,.'.,.....-A,.040.VA 1 - t20-Shorvirq C.q.ser ?li-Gatcr,1i .4 I . Onraq f.t ,t3 la ary 2pft 1.4 1 I"-$1.WitT)Cadet ;13.1101d II St ' ,__, I E'--I .7% 0,a:1 ,!. ;$..27) Ea:Atte.:1 1.1a1•0•170%,-.i.1,2%r•.:3 =',...7 Vt ..--, 1 L.-74.3 =2 Oarxia,17.',04 *110 1.,0sca 7:.1 0,071E.at 1 fl*-Grnm-,4 41..4443..41*g 70•4101ICE / 1'&7 117. te.7.:0,1 ta.ii [1:17111 rp; !Fr-Batik 0 Daniel Et0r. E ,/ .., - . '44 0•0.0•1 7-7arr,110-111111;ts,, -?.,,,,....:o a....a I - a. 3a.siwcipilv c+rtri i I Z.A..; 1 i:-..,icte -7--"'" -Tag L. EAleaa4/45 I 701r., I ^1-1-11i3;1511- ...Lit 1 ..12101Cild I 74'117) 1 5 019 / 1'2 a",1.11t L -1-----iTtro I....•,.---......-...,,.......-.......„. , IHil•Gercl-4 Offr.-elltitelmi t__. ...oral i,g Tg...., ----- ---.-- -----22--.11-•----.._..--_.-.---...---- '' .V.._•4remin.;Vet ar L 75).Nall 1 /dal I Elva:40:0. 1 1 Slr'i i Zs,(0011) I 7 ri.7.%) 1 ego I I St4 ," 1 a700:17) j _ ga'S2) : 001) kS7.5) :11. -- l --1----- -C4%.;-- - -----ls(^1-s) I . 3, 1111-(Irtai 1 I a:0mi Tearra . Taal 11:10, -1-----111------. . •-• Ertwa04 if:C5 A I Mr-17-*;.ia;Cra•Etr _ i 71:1•Gan•-.1adia.•5•7607 _...., Icall I 704.,_______, ) , 1 2 1 • E0.,.') 1------. ----1-.--- ,-151-'.2.--.:1-- - - _.?0')___-..___.•_,_____'6'0 .______.4_ ___..?5,1')______1..__ __ _:,7 00'4__ 1 ; • c t..,.■to• t 1 I 1 sr,-,av t,,,p,..,..-.7,,,,F.::7•■T4.:i,,,,J•1,,i.L.:-../11a 7,7011.11a1,1aa,ta.04 ttrA a t t1.0 wroer c,.S.1.:.:1.7s 0,7.0.apass.is.aci.at to re car.:4 4,o..:•.c ,••••:4 ri'Se:41-,-e : 1E,-44,,,..•I$c tel.4 T.;I4,49,,}1:-..C1,,Ltt It:,:Lzr.,,,a...isr.F.4±",14,:tit 413 70,:c4 le 1:E. L't70-.• .:,;1•70.0; p0... .:31. arr1/5'• MI ;74 I ; . 7:i.r7=.•,..105,1G....k.) IV 0 .• 0 1,ri . ,•:,•,•,...., :•N ;,- •__ i - . /.....N. • 34 . Vincentian PUDA PS- October 2013 Name. jro ect . Vincentian PUG-Prep..Cond;-Scenario.2 . Analysis Name: --t-ceffitr-77-7—r ---I Land Use Indpenderrt Variable size Thrie-Period Method Entry Exit Total CL 00- a opping F.155.'Wq,.Teit7GTZTE-711 250 FiFelWReak Hour in 1 B'et Fit(LOGjE if ; center . ,. Lei(T).=0.67Ln(X)+2.3f 531 575 -41437 • . • , Tr Rerluttiorts i ecify-a percentNaby:whichthe Ently Dip-and..Exit Trip.wiii be reclui:..ed for each Land Use:This reduction is applied to the En*Tdii•and ExitTdp.frOm the previous section.To record any notes,click 4:1 Add Notes above. Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted-Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit , [ 82a-Shopping Center L.......20 53i 10 fro 576 1 : . . gxterpal trips .. Spedify the percentage of Pass-bytts tor etch Land Use%The Percentaqeswilt be:redUced from the total number of xternal .; TOO-torn the previciaeediort..To record artynotes,click-fe Add Notes above. The icon preceding'the Pass-by%valualnditIltes data'proyidedliy ITE.qcktrig:the icdn changesla.custoin Pass.,-1)0,- valiieJo data provided by ITE. 820-Shopang CentLear Land Use EXtemal Trips 1107 Fess-by% 011/5 itro Non-pass-by Patt'-byTrip's , . 277 Tripe 830 . , .....—... 35 Vincentian PUDA TIS m October 2013 Appendix E: Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) 36 Vfncent►nn PUDA TIS- October 2013 r1..___, ...........1 v zmill Zo 0 � V) t ce CJ F=- ~ O O b in W W F= t- In .-_ N Z t w, CH W I ' emu�MM..whir.0•r.w. N F" Z i ; I. r a * W • F 111! a • �' • • • .__ i W r + +c * i+i *s s r FW- W Z eel ZW Z � W_ W r.' t J W ip Z ur W 1Q• OQ N CO 37 Vincentian PUDA TIS- October 2013FIL°14' • - W----- - N $ Z m ix IL W ^. = ti N F— 11 N ILI LLICL 1– I-- N 302 csi cy R2n. WW •• - a, H a n • P I- I-- .4-) - ;•<- . z (-4 W W — W • a D Z •�' t /. e. W � a Ce 1...I.1_4\Y .4' — :11,14 1 - j s e . I s - N CO W *. • K ate- N 1, ` �� W W `�le/ i Z W W c� s1• uo , W - W ce N co e? Z Z Ce W [jliCilliC Z _.. LL.i_W • Z W ‘04 M 1 H X • W F- N . N CO 38 , LEI h M [ -8 1 :4 — w E N T.) -� U' _ i0 W Z M ""mow r .. g Ki z 018 i ° V lm -I _till o ta w r- § ':k Va Pd� iti o moouj 'Zw tO ® N V W � OZ om co --I < (10 Lu 40 V!a _I —cc ) OW! N.-'416- E 1- %,-- )14 ' / N iz. .g 0 . co < t TO 0 ti 1:V• / * Or %4005. i( X Ct - o 0 li% ‘, $ 0.,\ ' g 4 00 OP 41 wii," Ir . „ di "v • \II,■■■ AIIIIMIlatO • Ito d er 4,17/( //fillEINIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMai • x it /I � � ■I i w � � 111 o W iN 11111 1i w Q Q UN / Z O::.J a. 47, F. H illai , / c) br4 .- 44 . i : L _ ..,),Filhoix i , o , A% , "IMO ri IIVAIIIITIVil ,li a,=44 icl, :1 w °`` - ,________\. - ,- 4= - o � U -,„ O2./ 4F, w J u) 0- a. w Z O M M M 4 W M U m <O<O O f/) O p o MIME w\----------, ;, == . r n iz Ali� hAIhI IIII al 4, Lc2- e 1 FIN . , z `V/8 1- In 1.5 4 z 4 S Lo w • • V < ♦ ♦♦♦■ ♦♦♦ ♦w ♦♦♦ ♦♦ Z. i I ♦ ♦ ♦ �'♦ � ♦ Et c W• 10r4 4 _i-E- o En ." • zo_ O ES ‘4 .O LLER .i‘, \\,,,, 'AI& 10 ,c ‘ V f 746 ■ g. 2 V 4 4 =11 0 AI ____c") • L v. 2 • .. mi. r 41„41 III IHMI HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS•PLANNERS•SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way•Naples,Florida 34110•Phone 239.254.2000•Fax:239.254.2099 July 1, 2014 Re: Vincentian GMPA (PL-20130001767, CP-2013-10) PUD Amendment(PL-2013-0001726) HM File No.: 2013.043 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. on behalf of the property owner, have made two concurrent applications to Collier County. These applications include (1) a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to change the future land use of the subject site from Urban, Mixed Use District,Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict,to Urban,Mixed Use District, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict; and (2) to amend the Vincentian PUD to change the zoning classification from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district, to allow construction of a maximum of 360 residential dwelling units, or up to 250,000 gross square feet of commercial land uses, or a combination thereof, which may include a hotel limited to 150 rooms, and/or an assisted living facility. These lands total 30.681 acres and are located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, approximately 1.5 miles west of the intersection of County Road 951 (Collier Boulevard) and U.S. 41 East, in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of U.S. 41 East and Southwest Boulevard. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this amendment and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Thursday, July 17, 2014 at 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library, Meeting Room "A", 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway,Naples,Florida 34113. Should you have questions prior to the meeting,please feel free to contact me at 239-254-2000. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES,INC. Robert J. Mulhere,FAICP Director of Planning RJM/sek *Please note that the Collier County Public Library does not sponsor or endorse this program. Naples•Fort Myers AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Signature of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 1st day of July, 2014 by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. Jt0-04CWAP 11-WW-P (Signature of Notary Public) (Notary Seal) Stephanie Karol Printed Name of Notary ,zQy STEPHANIE ?� . MY COMMISSION#EE 163504 .•ra."7:;' EXPIRES:March 9,2016 P,f,r ` Bonded Nu Notary Public Underwriters 4 ..L..-,� NIG.HBO RHOOD 1 lit ! ® 1 E? k G The public is invitedf to attend a neighbo`rliood teeting'held by•Robert J. Mulhere, NAPLES DAILY NEWS FAICP of Hole Montes,Inc.and Richard D.Yovanovich, Esquire of.Coleman,Yova ':vfi_, Published Daily ich&Koester, P.A. on behalf of the prooee. owner-atth allowing lme andaoc�iiikat Naples,FL 34110 r Thursday,Ju If I' ;Y!.hl• 41=i.ii!)11' Collier County South Re e it1t• n, ,91- Room"A" n - Affidavlt of Publican 8065 Lely Cultural}0� Fc;��.,1� , =lam i �� _ fl State of Florida Two concurrent formal applications have'been m.• ?�40-01trar'G e®r a lint IA°t F Counties of Collier and Lee ,tions include(1)a Growth Management Plan Amen'dm .,Rlk gia* iii,iSeior C iI C 1JJAI= ®,use of he;subject site from Urban,.Mixed Use Distr ea;1U 1141Dvri is?'dIt P ,, y '.,+ira'y. d X .�C y" d ,h �Y ' ' ubdi triot;ta ''arb=Can Mixed Use Distric 3 eii r ixee'8 tiLe ga� E6r��J Before the undersigned the serve as t. 4`-4a f gn Y to � n�t_ � e tian PUD niC a�aiin�[C1ass E •��'�neE�i'��^tat �4a� appeared Daniel McDermott,who on s *x e U)'zoning,dlstrie o a 0fcc {�K�al e�nioli -Flt'"�i�°o9-M`�f�`�� '�pj° .r' o e o allow_ const ion o re�a ot..pg „i,J _ 1_t �fl m ` l li _- i Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Da l s a o- �i ,A ilprae ; or up .` 50 0©® g:ass s•ua feet�of co aloe �F111�1e.E arm newspaper published at Naples,in Col �, . e le�rgf/It. 'I aI c o"e se, -Easy Peel®Labels 1 • 111.111. Bend along line to 1 0 AVERY®5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper 101101 expose Pop-Up Edge"' j 1 300 PORTER STEEET REALTY TRUST 331 BENSON ST LADN TRUST 331 BENSON STREET LAND TRUST 32 NICHOLS ST C/O PIKUS PROPERTY MANAGMENT C/O PIKUS PROPERTY MANAGMENT SWAMPSCOTT,MA 01907--1034 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 5290 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES,FL 34116-0000 NAPLES,FL 34116--0000 i---, ADAM JR,GLORIA A=&FREDERICK ADAMSKI,RICHARD D ADEE,JAMES A 2926 REEDY RD JANE D ADAMSKI SHARON ADEE SINKING SPRING,PA 19608-9621 14700 S M 43 HWY 12228 HARBOR OAKS DR HICKORY CORNERS,MI 49060--9709 MACHESNEY PARK,IL 61115--1046 AFFORDABLE WHISTLERS COVE LTD AGUAYO,ESTEBAN=&TERESA AGUILERA,LILIAN 1275 LAKE HEATHROW LN STE 115 289 BENSON ST 339 BENSON ST HEATHROW,FL 32746--4398 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 ALGER,JOYCE ALLEN EST,JAMES R ALLEN,PAUL E=&SARAH P 2 ARAPAHO TRL CAROLE F ALLEN 1 NATCHEZ TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7977 . 3 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7969 NAPLES,FL 34113-7990 ALMEIDA,ANTONIO=&MARIA ANDERSON,NORMAN E=&BEVERLY J ANDERSON,TERRANCE N 14 1/2 WHITSBOURGH ST PAUL E=&HEATHER L ANDERSON 285 BENSON ST TAUNTON,MA 02780-1916 11227 OAKLEIGH DR NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 MIDDLEVILLE,MI 49333-8792 ANDREWS,PIERRE ANTHONY,WILLIAM E APARICIO,ANTONIO A=&NIVIA M CHRISTINE M ROBBINS DEANNA B ANTHONY 294 PORTER ST 13 BUTTERFIELD TRL 1 ABILENE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 NAPLES,FL 34113-7901 NAPLES,FL 34113-7945 ARNDT,FRANKT ARROYO,JAMIE AUBIN,MICHELLE CINDE LOU KAVAN 2415 HARPER STREET SERGE PAQUETTE 20 OSAGE TRL TAMPA,FL 33605-0000 19 OSAGE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113--7971 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 B S&M L POWERS JT R/L TRUST BADILLO,RICARDO F BALLMAN JR,WILLIAM JAMES 7922 KINGS RIDGE CIR ADRIANA LABRA BADILLO ROSALIE MARIE BALLMAN FAIRBORN,OH 45324-1874 135 3RD ST 27 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--8551 NAPLES,FL 34113--7943 BANK OF AMERICA BARNHART,ROY J=&CARMEN A BARRY,WALLACE J=&LAURI A 101 E KENNEDY BLVD 205 BENSON ST 7137 S COUNTY ROAD A TAMPA,FL 33602-5179 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 - SUPERIOR,WI 54880-0000 r, BEKESY,ILONA H BELCHER,LARRY M=&SANDY L BERGER TR,MITCHELL M HERSFELDER STRASSE 37 JEFFREY MICHAEL BELCHER JOSEPH M BERGER LIVING TRUST D-36088 NANCY ELIZABETH TUTTLE JEAN CLAUDE BERGER HUENFELD 107 STONEWALL DR 109 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD GERMANY, D36068-0000 SAVANNAH,GA 31419--3272 NAPLES,FL 34113-7960 I`tiquettes faciles a peter 1 '�` Repliez a la hachure afin del www avert'com 1 Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® Sens de rev�Jer le rebord Po U *�"j 1-800-GO-AVERY j chargement P P 1 =Easy Peel®Labels 1 • 111111111111 Bend along line to © AVERY® 5160® I Use Avery®Template 5160® 1 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge," j 1 BERGERON,FERNAND BERIAULT ET AL,DENIS BLAIS,GERALD JANINE DESMEULES 27 ARAPAHO TRL MICHELINE SCOTT BLAIS N DES BOULEAUX NAPLES,FL 34113---7951 1905 ST JACQUES NTREAL,QC DRUMMONDVILLE,QC CANADA, H1B 5L2-0000 CANADA, J2B 7S7--0000 BOGGS,LESLIE A BOLAND FAMILY TRUST BOLDUC,RICHARD A 1394 RIDGECREST CT 224 BENSON ST MARY E BOLDUC FAIRBORN,OH 45324--5912 NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 69 HIGH ST ASSONET,MA 02702--1706 BOND, SANDRA G BOND,DARLENE M BOUCHARD,DIANE ANDREWS 8 CHISHOLM TRL HOWARD J BOND JEAN-YVES BOUCHARD NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 23 CHEYENNE TRL STEVE BOUCHARD NAPLES,FL 34113---7943 3 PECOS TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113---7952 BOUCHARD,DIANE ANDREWS BOUR,PATRICIAJ BOURGET,LUCIEN C=&THERESAJ JEAN-YVES BOUCHARD BRUCE E PAGE 31 CIMMARON TRL 6 ARAPAHO TRAIL 12409 FOX RUN CT NAPLES,FL 34113--7933 NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 HUNTLEY,IL 60142---7418 BOUTIN,ROLLANDE BOWDEN,BEVERLY E BOYLE,ELIZABETH ROBERT BOUCHER RUTH R EISELE 103 TAHITI CIR CHANTAL DOUVILLE 12 CIMMARON TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113---4010 ,Z PECOS TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 \PLES,FL 34113---7952 BRAFFORD,WARD BRANDON,TIMOTHY R=&SHELBY J BREAU,EVELYN FREEDA BRAFFORD 15 MULESHOETRL 225 BENSON ST 2810 E CREEKS EDGE DR NAPLES,FL 34113-7947 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 BLOOMINGTON,IN 47401--8381 BREAD,EVELYN BREAD,EVELYN • BRIONES,ELADIO 225 BENSON ST 225 BENSON ST 272 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 • BRISSON,DIANE J BROUSSEAU,CHARLES EDOUARD BROWN,EDWARD H 11 ABILENE TRAIL MARIELLE PELLETIER DAVID BROWN NAPLES,FL 34113--7945 48 RUE VERLAINE 1 PECOS TRL RICHELIEU,QC NAPLES,FL 34113--7952 CANADA, J2W 1 R7---0000 BULFRANO,LORA BULMER,MALCOLM BUNCH SR,DAVID G=&GWENDOLYN 120 3RD ST 4 CHEROKEE TRL 319 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8535 NAPLES,FL 34113---7916 NAPLES,FL 34113---8556 CADER,DOROTHY E CAIN EST,ANN M CAMPANELLO,ANGELO B=&DIANE M 36 ABILENE TRL RICHARD W CAIN 141 1ST ST NAPLES,FL 34113---7900 14 SPANISH TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8533 NAPLES,FL 34113---7948 Etiquettes faciles paler 1 Repliez •a la hachure afin del • www averycom 1 ..�_.___ :. A\/Lw®G4Gfl® I .Sens de - r4'v4ler b rebord POo-UPTM : 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel®Labels 1 •♦ Bend along line to 1 Q AVERY® 5160® 1 Use Avery®Template 5160® � Feed Paper ■� expose Pop-Up Edge*" j 1 CAPPS,JAMES A=&CONSTANCE A CAREY,RALPH W CARLS,DAVID W 347 BENSON ST#A CHARLOTTA B CAREY GENE RAE CARLS NAPLES,FL 34113---8556 30020 DEER HARBOUR DR 30 ABILENE TRAIL SALISBURY,MD 21804-2509 NAPLES,FL 34113---9654 i""-- • CARMIGNANI,WILLIAM B CARTWRIGHT,MARGARET CATERINI,WILLIAM=&VERONICA HONG THITHU NGUYEN 315 BENSON ST PO BOX 108 208 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8556 ROSCOE,PA 15477-0108 NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 CAVANAGH,LAWRENCE J=&MARYANN CHACE,ANITA I CHANCELLOR,MARIANNA 109 2ND ST 20 CHEYENNE TRL 126 BRADFORD PL NAPLES,FL 34113--8550 NAPLES,FL 34113--7922 MT WASHINGTON,KY 40047-8117 CHARTIER,MARCEL CIARCIA,CONNIE CIOCCO,SAMUEL R 24 ABILENE TRL DEBORAH B PASINI PATRICIA ANN CIOCCO NAPLES,FL 34113--7970 88 AMBASSADOR DR 16 MEADE DR UNITA LATROBE,PA 15650-1061 MANCHESTER,CT 06042--0000 . CLARKE,JEFF CLEMONS,LINDA COLLIER CNTY JANET DIPASQUALE 302 BENSON ST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2348 HUCKLEBERRY RD NAPLES,FL 34113--8505 WATER SEWER MANCHESTER,NJ 08759--6124 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES,FL 34112-4961 t,,,.■ COLLIER CNTY COLLISS,ROY=&SHIRLEY COOK,CLINTON E BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THOMAS K=&KAREN COLLISS PATSY M COOK UTILITIES DIVISION 12 APACHE TRL LOT 303 69487 BANNOCK RD 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E#H-3 NAPLES,FL 34113-7965 SAINT CLAIRSVILL,OH 43950-9776 NAPLES,FL 34112---4961 COOK,NORMAN CORNMAN,JAMES E=&NANCY A CRISCILLO,GERALDINE TERRY=&ROSALIE PHILLIPS 13 CIMMARON TRL 1 CIMMARON TRL 815 W MAHONEY RD NAPLES,FL 34113--7914 NAPLES,FL 34113---7986 BRASHER FALLS,NY 13613---4258 CRISP,BARBARA CUBESMART L P CUMMINS,DAVANI 6881 WOOD LAKE CIR PTA-CS#451 .4260 JACK FROST CT APT 5 �'OUNG HARRIS,GA.30582---1615 ,- PO BOX 320099 • : t,:ABL" :5,_FL."34112---5242 • 10 I/r�g H r r ks,c pi ,DS8z-(4e1S ALEXANDRIA,VA 22320--0000 CURLEY,RICHARD L=&THERESSA M CURTON,JAMES E CWALT ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 3 BILL ST F BERNICE CURTON %ALDRIDGE CONNORS LLP DERRY,NH 03038--5260 10106 PORTAGE RD 1615 S CONGRESS AVE#200 PORTAGE,MI 49002--7281 DELRAY BEACH,FL 33445-0000 DAVIS TR,KENNETH L DAVIS,CHARLES N DAVIS,HORTENSE L K LYLE DAVIS REVOCABLE TRUST 322 PORTER ST 23 ABILENE TRL 2977 PALMETTO CT NAPLES,FL 34113---8542 NAPLES,FL 34113---7945 DUNEDIN,FL 34698---9663 Etiquettes fadles peter 1 Reptiez a la hachure afin de; www.avery.com Utilisez le eabarit AVERY®5160® rh5enas chant reveler le rebord Pop-Up"' � 1-800-GO-AVERY I 1 Easy Peel®Labels i • ME= Bend along line to CA /��/E�jy®5160® ; Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j j DAVIS,LARRY E DAVISON,ERNEST DE LATORRES,ROBERTO PINERO JACQUELINE J DAVIS MARK DAVISON ET AL XIOMARA CRUZ " ' ACHE TRL 22526 BEECH ST 475 SOUTHWEST BLVD LES,FL 34113--0000 DEARBORN,MI 48124---2735 NAPLES,FL 34113--8528 DE LEON,JAIME J DE VILLERS,JOHN DE VRIES,ROGER=&DONNA J 147 1ST ST VANDA DE VILLERS 2521 REVELATION LN NAPLES,FL 34113--8533 DIANE DEVILLERS ROCKFORD,IL 61109---3777 16 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7922 DEMPSEY,HUGH J DEONARINE,KELVIN DESFORGES,GILLES JANET MCGIRL 3764 KENT DR LUCILLE BONNEAU DESFORGES 241 HILLSIDE AVE NAPLES,FL 34112--3740 SYLVAIN DAIGNEAULT CRANFORD,NJ 07016---3409 6 OREGON TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 DICE,JOHN N DIIOIA,DAVID MICHAEL=&ADELE DITTRICH,WILLIAM 8 APACHE TRAIL 808 GOLDEN MEADOW RD ETHEL DITTRICH NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 EAGAN,MN 55123--1964 26 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 DOMINGO-MIGUEL,MIGUEL PASCUAL DROZD,RONALD J=&JOAN S DUMAS,MAURICE R SANDRA MARTINEZ 2 AHL AVE TRLR 21 JEANNE 0 DUMAS 224 PORTER ST ALBANY,NY 12205--2863 290 BILLINGS ST QUINCY,MA 02171--1804 -- NAPLES,FL 34113---8542 E JEAN NIGRO EAST,BRIAN C=&MELISSA A EBANKS,DALE GARY J NIGRO 483 EVERGREEN DR 5218 GILCHRIST ST 51 PHILLIPS DR TALLMADGE,OH 44278-1356 NAPLES,FL 34113---7726 OLD BRIDGE,NJ 08857--2428 EBANKS,DALE EBANKS,MARLON ECKL,SARA S 521B GILCHRIST ST - 5218 GILCHRIST ST DIANNA SHUST NAPLES,FL 34113-7728 NAPLES,FL 34113---7728 6 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7971 ELGART EST,CHRISTINE EMELANDER,SYDNEY B ENDERS,JERRY L o JANICE F EMELANDER LOIS L MORROW `/ /oDAVIDAELGARTPR!/' 120 4TI ` "t / p�1sf PO BOX 1%a .86 ..11/0' i : 12 ARAPAHO TRL LOT 315 GAYLORD,MI 49734--0145 NAPLES,FL 34113--7977 NAPLES,FL 34113--8536 FEENEY,MICHEL FELLER TR,CYNTHIA H 130 2ND,DAVID=&ZENAIDA 130 2ND ST GAETANE NADEAU EARL F FELLER TR 1575 LOUIS CARIER#606 UTD 5/31/00 NAPLES,FL 34113-8534 MONTREAL,QC 1710 TREMONT ST CANADA, H4N 2Z7---0000 DOVER,OH 44622-1075 t� FEREZA,ANDRA FINCH,MARION FISHER,ROBERT D=&ETHEL M 1673 6057 N OLD 41 3 ARAPAHO TRL NAPLES,MANDARIN RD NAP FL 34102--5139 VINCENNES,IN 47591---7556 NAPLES,FL 34113--7981 Etiquettes faciles a peter Se de Repliez la hachure afin del www averycom ', 11+il. In nnihnrit AVFRV®5160® ! -1.nrs...e..+ reveler le rebord Pop-UpT 1 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel®Labels i • MIMI Bend along line to AVE ®5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeT"t j 1 FLOOD,DONNA J FLORIDANN LLC FLORIDIMMO LLC 27 CIMMARON TRL 2633 LONGBOAT DR 2633 LONGBOAT DR NAPLES,FL 34113--7914 NAPLES,FL 34104--0000 NAPLES,FL 34104--3329 FONTES,DIOSDADO FOURNIER,PAUL FOWLER,DON A=&LA VERNE DALIA FONTES LISE DARCY 332 BENSON ST SANDRA FONTES 8 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8505 16 CHISHOLM TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7971 NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 FOX,RAYMOND A FRESHOUR,CLAYTON GAINES,DONALD P 3 CHEYENNE TRL 204 PORTER ST CAROLYN D GAINES NAPLES,FL 34113-7943 NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 4070 NEW COLUMBIA RD CAMPBELLSVILLE,KY 42718---0000 GALLAGHER TR,KEVIN GALLEGOS,MARINA GIRARD ET AL,ROBERT MARGARET M GALLAGHER TR 217 BENSON ST 12 ABILENE TRAIL KEVIN&MARG GALLAGHER TRUST NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 NAPLES,FL 34113---7961 UTD 12/28/0517 SPANISH TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7984 GLEN,MARVIN GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF NAPLES GOBER TR,ROBERT E SHIRLEY MARIE HEISTAND 2614 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 615 KATHLEEN T GOBER TR 2985 HARRIS RD SE NAPLES,FL 34103-4409 GOBER FAMILY REV TRUST PORT ORCHARD,WA 98366---2344 UTD 10/21/109 AL ST DERRY,NH 03038--5270 �,,,..\ GONZALEZ,EDUARDO GORANSON,PHYLLIS M GORGES,DIETER=&PHYLLIS 320 BENSON ST 39 CIMMARON TRL STACY A VELD NAPLES,FL 34113--8505 NAPLES,FL 34113-7933 DIETER H GORGES JR 41 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7933 GRAHAM,JAMES J=&BE I I Y L GRANDAL,MERCEDES L GREINER,CYNTHIA S 35 ARAPAHO TRL CESAR A HERNANDEZ—CRUZ 22 APACHE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7951 28 CHISHOLM TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7965 NAPLES,FL 34113-7973 GRETHER,GARY W=&BELINDA K GRETHER,MARY RUTH GRIMES,JOE A=&MARJORIE E ' 6084 HUNTINGTON WOODS DR RANDAL P GRETHER 1550 CHESAPEAKE AVE NAPLES,FL 34 12=`2983' • . -1 s/:,' 1 NAVAJO TRL : NAPLES,FL 34102`-9511—.1 , NAPLES,FL 34113-7990 GUERRA,AURORA D GUERRA,MANUEL GUY,PAULA L 2290 SW 132 AVE 2290 SW 132 AVE 12 OSAGE TRL MIAMI,FL 33175--1121 MIAMI,FL 33175-1121 NAPLES,FL 34113--7971 H VERN AASEBY REV LIV TRUST HAERING,AUBREY L HAGERMAN,G KENNETH=&UNA R KYME S AASEBY REV LIV TRUST JOSHUA L HEARING KENNETH EDWARD HAGERMAN 18 NAVAJO TRL 240 PORTER ST PETER JOHN HAGERMAN NAPLES,FL 34113---7939 NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 31 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7976 Etiquettes faciles a peter 1 • Repliez a la hachure afin de i www avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® 1 Sens de TM i rhnrneamant reveler le rebord Pop-Up I 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 -.Easy Peel®Labels i • MIMI Bend along line to Q gVERY� 5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® 1 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j j HAMILTON,ANNA F HANDEL,RICHARD HAROLD R DEVRIES JR TRUST JAMES W HAMILTON II 59 CROMWELL RD 3 SPANISH TRAIL ".`N HAMILTON RD WIMBLEDON NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 ,HRANVILLE,PA 19330---1810 UK, SW 19 8LF---0000 HARPER,ELLA MAE HARTE,EDWARD HARTMAN,ROBERT D 16 ABILENE TRL VALERIA P HARTE KATHLEEN M HARTMAN NAPLES,FL 34113--7970 26 NAVAJO TRL 1 CHEROKEE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7924 NAPLES,FL 34113--7953 HAYS,NAOMI CATHERINE HEAD,WILLIAM T HEATH JR,HERBERT B DONALD WAYNE KIESLER ROSE A HEAD TINA M HEATH 236 PORTER ST 107 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD 27 SILVER CIRCLE NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 NAPLES,FL 34113--7960 BARRE,VT 05641---0000 • • HEATH JR,HERBERT B=&TINA HELL,KLARA HENAULT,GILLES 27 SILVER CIR ILONA VIOLA HEINMULLER 161 RUE RONDEAU BARRE,VT 05641--9046 580 12TH AVE S STE EMELIE DE NAPLES,FL 34102---8007 L'ENERGIE,QC CANADA, 34113--0000 . HENDERSON,SAMUEL C=&CAROL M HENDRICKS,WILLIAM E HENRIQUEZ,IRMA IVETTE 5167 ROMAINE SPRING DR TERRY L HENDRICKS 5470 16TH PL SW APT 106 FENTON,MO 63026-0000 9 PECOS TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34116-4963 NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 HENSLEY,BONNIE M HERNANDEZ,EVARISTO HITCHING POST RICHARD 0 ESKRIDGE NELDA HERNANDEZ 32 CHEYENNE TRL 2 PECOS TRL 18 CHISHOLM TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7966 NAPLES,FL 34113--7973 HITCHING POST CO-OP HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN ATTN RICHARD ESKRIDGE 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN • 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL I. NAPLES,'FL s 34113--793 . +' I NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-=-7235 .l;ii HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 • Etiguettes faciles peter i •• Repliez a la hachure afin del Www avery.com 11.:1;,,,-I..•,,tilt.:+AvIDV®IC WI® I •Sens de r4v4Ier le rehord Poo-Uolm ! 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel®Labels i • M.. Bend along line to a AVERY®5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up EdgeTM 1 1 • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN ' 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 ' HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL • NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL i. NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 - - - I NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 • 1 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 . HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 tstiquettes faciles a paler 1 Repliez a la hachure din del www.avery.com Irilie.In nnharit AVFRV®51fA® I Sens de reveler le rebord Pop-Upu4 ; 1-600-G0-AVERY -Easy Peel®Labels i • EN= Bend along line to AVERY®5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge"' j 1 HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOM HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL ��LES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 62 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN . 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 1 • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 Etiquettes fades a peter 1 • Repliez a la hachure afin del www avery com 1 ......k.......:4.w.icov®ciGn® i LSens de le rebord Pop'UpT"" ; 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 -Easy Peel®Labels i • IMIIMI Bend along line to i CI AVERY 5160® i � ei"+ Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper ■ expose Pop-Up Edgj 1 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 /"� HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN • 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 ..,...\ • HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN . 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113--7935 NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HITCHING POST HOMEOWNERS ASSN HOCKSTRA,JOHN R=&TRACI L • 32 CHEYENNE TRL 32 CHEYENNE TRL 3340 PINEY RIDGE RD NAPLES,FL 34113---7935 NAPLES,FL 34113-7935 LUDINGTON,MI 49431---0000 HOEFT,RAY=&MYRNA HOPKINS,EDWARD W HORNER TR,RODNEY E 7409 CIRCLE TRL MARILYN R HOPKINS VERNA J HORNER TR WONDER LAKE,IL 60097--8458 r 37_:NAVAJO TRL RODNEY&VERNA HORNER RE TRUST • NAPLES,FL 34113-7976 UTD 10/18/011196 YORKSHIRE DR • MARION,OH 43302--6862 HORNYAK,JOHN=&SUSAN HOSKINS,NANCY A HOUGHTLING TR,ELLSWORTH CLARE 1919 MANCHESTER CIR DALE L HOSKINS MARGARET ANN HOUGHTLING TR NAPLES,FL 34109---7221 3325 WEBER DR UTD 10/27/04 NORTON,OH 44203--5756 17 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7976 /....„. HOULAHAN,EDWARD J=&T MARIE HUBBARD,JON K=&EVA G HUNT,JERRY D 1271 WEBSTER DRIVE 6604 NW MELODY LN E CHERYL HUNT SARNIA,ON PARKVILLE,MO 64152--2757 8 OREGON TRL CANADA, N7S 2J9-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-7972 Etiquettes faciles a peter 1 Repliez a la hachure akin del www avery com ® Sens de reveler le rebord Poo-lion' ! 1-800-GO-AVERY I Itiiica7 la naharit OVFRV®Sign � 1 -Easy Peel®Labels 1 • MUM. Bend along line to AVERY® 5160® 1 Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edger"" j 1 HUNYADY,ELMER J IACONELLI CO-TRS,ROBIN L IACONELLI TR,ROBIN JOAN M HUNYADY IACONELLI CO-TRS,PETER PETER IACONELLI TR ��HEROKEE TRL ROBIN L IACONELLI REV/TRUST ROBIN L IACONELLI REV TRUST ?LES,FL 34113-7953 UTD 2/26/98117 3RD ST UTD 2/26/98188 PRICE ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8551 NAPLES,FL 34113---8435 IONE,JOYCE JACOBSEN,GARY LEE JARDINE,LLOYD E=&JOYCE A RALPH WOODSON BROWN DENISE DIANE JACOBSEN 18 SPANISH TRL 27ABILENETRL 3541 HIGHLAND BLVD NAPLES,FL 34113---7948 NAPLES,FL 34113---7945 HIGHLAND,MI 48356---1827 JCS REALTY GROUP LLC JOHNSON,HELEN JOHNSON,HELEN KELLEY • 2614 TAMIAMI TRL N 9 OSAGE TRL 9 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34103--4409 NAPLES,FL 34113---7938 NAPLES,FL 34113---7938 JOHNSTONE,MARIE E=&ROSS H JUDD TR,GILES G JUNG,MICHEL 17 E LAKE BERNARD DR LONESOME DOVE TRUST CAROLE TURCOTTE SUNDRIDGE,ON UTD 01/03/97 16625 RUE DE LA MOUSSON CANADA, POA 1Z0--0000 9 NAVAJO TRL MARIBEL,QC NAPLES,FL 34113---7976 CANADA, J7J 2P1--0000 JUSTE,JACQUES BRICE KASABOSKI,DAN KAVERMAN,MICHELLE C CAROSE T JUSTE BETTY KASABOSKI 236 BENSON ST. 269 BENSON ST 1808 KINGSDALE AVE NAPLES,FL 34113--8540 - -OIAPLES,FL 34113-8541 OTTAWA,ON CANADA, KIT 148--0000 KELLY,JAMES T=&MARQUERITE KELLY,ROSEMARY A KING,CHESTER J=&GENEVIEVE N 9 MULESHOE TRAIL 22 PECOS TRL 12 SPANISH TRL . NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113--7966 NAPLES,FL 34113---7948 KIVETT,SANDRA D KLEIN,FRANCIS JOSEPH KOLLMEIER TR,KENNETH X 232 BENSON ST INEZ M KLEIN 4829 GARY RD NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 15 BUTTERFIELD TRL BONITA SPRINGS,FL 34134-3928 NAPLES,FL 34113-7901 KOWALEWSKI,STANLEY F KRACKER TR,HELEN L KUMITZ,MARSHA J ANTOINETTE KOWALEWSKI HELEN L KRACKER REV TRUST 11 CIMMARON TRAIL , 314 PLUM RUN RD ■ UTD 5/610:? •,. • NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 CANONSBURG,PA 15317--9727 7 SPANISH TRL NAPLES;FL 34113-7980 KUTIL,ALICE J LABONTE,NOEL LABRA,ANTOLIN 3652 STOER RD 12 NATCHEZ TRL RANGEL ARACELI SHAKER HEIGHTS,OH 44122---5116 NAPLES,FL 34113---7982 338 PORTER ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 LACOUNT,RITA LAKE,D ELIZABETH LAMBORELLE,RAYMOND 4 CHEYENNE TRL 112 2ND ST 14 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7922 NAPLES,FL 34113--8534 • NAPLES,FL 34113--7922 • Etiquettes faciles peter ; Repliez la hachure afin de vuww averycom .._ ,..•,,..Cal r,cn® 1 _Sens de rhithler le rebord Poo-UD : 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 =Easy Peel®Labels i • 1.1111MI Bend along line to i /��( ®5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® 1 Feed Paper eTM expose Pop-Up Edg j 1 LAMOTHE,ANDRE' LANGE,STEPHEN LANGMAID,JUDITH W DANIELLE SCOTT SANDRA L LANGE DONALD A LANGMAID 5980 DESLANDES ST 7 OSAGE TRL 16 CHEROKEE TRL HYACINTHE,QC NAPLES,FL 34113--7938 NAPLES,FL 34113---7967 CANADA, J2R 1C2---0000 LAVERDURE,ANDRE LAVOIE ET AL,ERIC LAZZARI,MARGARET M ANITA LEGAULT LAVERDURE 30 NAVAJO TRAIL 1207 MARTINIQUE CT MICHEL FEENEY NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 MARCO ISLAND,FL 34145---2321 7 SANTA FE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113R0--0000 LECHLIDER III,THOMAS L LEESON,WILLIAM R LENTZ,A ALLEN 16 APACHE TRL PHYLLIS E LEESON 168 BIG PIECE RD NAPLES,FL 34113---7965 6756 W BEAVER RD FAIRFIELD,NJ 07004-1210 GRAYLING,MI 49738-8587 LEWIS,HARLEY G LOCKNER TR,GEORGE P LOGSDON,OLLIE DALE T LEWIS MARLENE E LOCKNER TR TIM D=&APRIL BRIMER SUSANNE C ELSASS 8876 E MAIN ST 9 ABILENE TRL ' CYNTHIA G FUHRMAN9 NATCHEZTRL GALESBURG,MI 49053---9746 NAPLES,FL 34113---7945 NAPLES,FL 34113---7969 LONG,MARTHA LONGTIN,IRENE D LORA,EDEL=&YARA TREJO ' 102 3RD ST AMANDA R CHARPENTIER 351 BENSON ST • NAPLES,FL 34113---8535 TINA M WILSON NAPLES,FL 34113--8556 9 QUEENSWAY QUEENSBURY,NY 12804-1601 ." • LORA,JOSE A LOREDO,FLAVIO LOVETT,VERNON BRUCE CIRINA TREJO 306 PORTER ST LOIS ARLENE LOVETT . 350 PORTER ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 3 CIMMARON TRL • NAPLES,FL 34113-7986 NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 LUCAS,SANDRA LUDERS,FORTIL LUNDBERG,MARK 155 SOUTHWEST BLVD CONSULTA LUDERS CAROLYN LUNDBERG NAPLES,FL 34113-8558 117 1ST ST 19 ROSE ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8533 BROOKVILLE,PA 15825-2503 • MAC INTYRE,GORDON MACALISTER,STEPHEN W MACCHIA,DONICK J JUDI MAC INTYRE JENNIFER MACALISTER JOANN MACCHIA 2307 RANDALL ST 252 BENSON ST '' 27 OREGON TRAIL SUMMERLAND, - NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 CANADA, VOH 129-0000 MACDONALD,JOSEPH MACINTYRE,GORDON=&JUDI MADERS,DONALD W TR JUSTINA WILLIAMS 2307 RANDALL ST DONALD W MADERS TRUST 132 4TH ST SUMMERLAND,BC UTD 9/21/04 NAPLES,FL 34113--8536 CANADA, VOH 1Z0-0000 6 SANTA FE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7979 MALANDE,JEAN MALDONADO,JOSE L MALERBA,LOUIS M=&THERESA M LUCIENNE E DIEUDONNE 101 2ND ST LOUIS M MALERBA JR 220 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113---8550 19 PECOS TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 Etiquettes faciles a peter ; • Repliez a la hachure afin de 1 www avery com Sens de y reveler le rebord Poo-Un , 1-800-GO-AVERY .1a:1:...-1......{.-..:f AI/CDVe C1Gne 1 T�" l Easy Peel®Labels I • a Bend along line to AVERY® 5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM' 1 MARPLE,NATHAN JIANSFIELD EST,DONNA J MARC,PASCAL=&MAGALIE 10 CHEYENNE TRAIL 288 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 Ofy��A CLARK NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 E H CLARK 17, _,JOS TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7952 MARTIN,DENNIS MARTINEZ,JOSE DE JESUS MARTENS,HERMANN=&JOAN MARJORIE G MARTIN MARTINEZ,ANA MARIA 8 BUTTERFIELD TRL 20 FURLONG COURT 5539 NAPLES,FL 34113--7968 TORONTO,ON NAPLESES,,FL FL 34141 13---8766 CANADA, M1J 1Y8-0000 MC CORKLE,JOHN J MARTINEZ,VERONICA MAUK,CHRISTINE JOY=&BUELL 625 NEPONSET ST 281 BENSON ST SERGIO ALFARO NORWOOD,MA 02062 5201 237 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 -- NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 MCCUTCHEON,GORDON R MCGEE REVOCABLE TRUST MC LEOD,JOHN G 350 BENSON ST 20 ARAPAHO TRAIL JUNE MC LEOD NAPLES,FL 34113---7977 7 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8505 NAPLES,FL 34113-7976 MCKEEFRY,JIMMY L MCKEEFRY,JIMMY L=&LORI A 14 PECOS TRL LORI A MCKEEFRY MELFORD D=&ELLEN E 6234 QUARRY DR 14 PEC NAPLES,FL 34113-7966 6234 QUARRY DR PULASKI,WI 54162--0000 PULASKI,WI 54162---0000 MICHAUD,YANICK MICHELSEN,WILLIAM MEEK,RICHARD=&SANDRA P76 BENSON ST PAUL W MICHELSEN 135 WOODLAND FRST 103 OREGON TRAIL WINFIELD,WV 25213---9606 NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 MILSTED SR EST,ALVIN L MILLER TR,EARL P MILLER,ERNEST P=&DARLA A 19 EUCLID AVE SONIAA MILLER TR JEFFREY W MILLER 21 CHEROKEE TRAIL PITMAN,NJ 08071---2422 UTD 5/17/96 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 7807 RIVER DR SPRING GROVE,IL 60081-9303 MOORE,VICTORIA L MORIN TR,ISABELLE FAY 19 ORE,ANN . 4 OSAGE TRL MORIN REVOCABLE TRUST 19 OREGON TRL UTD 03/13/08 NAPLES,FL 34113--7988 • 1 ' NAPLES,FL 34113---7971 1 15 CHEROKEE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7926 MORRONE,ANTHONY J MULLINS,ERNEST C=&TERRY L MORIN,HELENS ANDREWS JOAN M MC GEE 13 CHEROKEE TRL DIANE ANDREWS BOUCHARD 15 PECOS TRAIL LOT 328 NAPLES,FL 34113---7926 1266 RUE DU VISON L'ANCIENNE-LORET,QC NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 ,...,,CANADA, 62E 1V9---0000 MURCH,GLENN MURCH,KEITH D MUNGER,JOANNE S JANET MURCH CATHERINE A MURCH 2 OREGON TRL --- 799 RIVERSIDE DR 17 NATCHEZ TRAIL CAMBRIDGE,ON NAPLES,FL 34113--7972 NAPLES,FL 34113 0000 CANADA, N3H 2V1---0000• Etiquettes faciles a peter ; :asy Peel®Labels i • MIME Bend along line to cil Ate ®5160® i Jse Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edgeml j 1 JEWELL,FRANK DENNIS NICHOLS,JAMES C NINO JR,MIGUEL DETER ER T T NEWELL NELDA G NICHOLS ARLETH LABRA 301 BENSON ST 11 NAVAJO TRAIL 228 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8556 NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 --.-"� ODON,OTIS L OLIVER,MICHAEL ORLOFSKY,FRANK 11 SANTA FE TRL 336 BENSON ST JOSEPHINE WOMELSDORF NAPLES,FL 34113---8505 33 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7919 NAPLES,FL 34113---7976 ORLOFSKY,FRANK ORLOFSKY,FRANK PAPINEAU,RUTH V JOSEPHINE WOMELSDORF JOSEPHINE WOMELSDORF 2170 10TH AVE NE 4 OREGON TRAIL 33 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34120--4967 NAPLES,FL 34113--7972 NAPLES,FL 34113--7976 PARADIS,DELPHIS PARROT,KENNETH J PATRICK,LORETTAA • ESTHER TREMBLAY 335 BENSON ST 7747 WILLIAM STREET 28 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--8556 MENTOR,OH 44060---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-7940 PAUL,MARIE L PEEVER,J CARL=&ELLEN PELLETIER,GILLES 216 BENSON ST BRYAN J PEEVER DIONNE HUGUETTE O TRL 210 PORTER ST 5 NAVAJO NAPLES,FL 34113-8540 FL 34113---8542 ES, NAPLES,FL 34113---7990 NAPLES, . /"'■ PEREZ,ANTONIO PERSHING,E LEE PETKOV,BORISLAV H . JUANA PONCE 1207 MARTINIQUE CT TEODORA P KYUMURDZHIEVA 149 4TH ST MARCO ISLAND,FL 34145--2321 277 BENSON ST NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 TRAILERACRES NAPLES,FL 34113---8552 PICHE,JACQUES PICK,DENNIS . PITTMAN,INA POWELL LYNE MORIN 21899 S 600 W DONALD J HENDRICK III LA CROSSE,IN 46348---9760 43 CIMMARON TRL MARCEL=&MARIE JEANNE PICHE NAPLES,FL 34113-7933 31 ABILENETRL NAPLES,FL 34113R1-0000 LAURETTE DESCHENES PLEAU ET AL,DANIEL PIUZE,LAUR PIUZE,LAURETTE DESCHENES 7 CHEYENNE TRL MICHELE PIUZE MICHELE PIUZE JEAN TREMBLAY 14 ABILENE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113---7943 1292 JULIEN GREENQUEBEC,QC NAPLES,FL 34113---7970 CANADA, GIW 3M3-0000 PLEAU ET AL,DANIEL PLEAU,DANIEL PONCE,CRISTINA P 12 CHEYENNE TRL MICHELYNE PLEAU 123 1ST STREET NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 9 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113--7943 „�1 POOLE,KAREN POWERS,DENNIS A POYNTER,ROBERT 3518 WILLYS PKWY MAUREEN ANN POWERS 4680 PARKSTONE LN TOLEDO,OH 43612-1013 14 NATCHEZ TRAIL AVON,IN 46123-7095 NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 • Etiquettes faciles a peter 1 Sens de Repllez a la hachure afin del www.averywm Itfiilico7 la naharit OVFRY®516A® ! _�_�____a reveler le rebord Pop-Up''" ; 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel®Labels i • 11.1111111 Bend along line to i V AVERY®5160® i Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up Edge"' j 11 1 POZAN,EDWARD G=&JUDITH A PREVATT,DAVID L=&ANNALEAH B QUINN III,JAMES 23 ARAPAHO TRAIL 260 PORTER ST PO BOX 325 'SLES,FL 34113---7964 NAPLES,FL 34113---8542 CLARKDALE,AZ 86324---0325 RAMBO,HENRY L RAMOS,ELVIA REFERENCE ONLY WANDA F RAMBO BENIGNO SAUCEDA HITCHING POST MOBILE HOME 41 CHEROKEE TRL 256 PORTER ST CO-OP NAPLES,FL 34113---7928 NAPLES,FL 34113---8542 , —0000 REGAN,JOSEPH M REINHARD,MICHAEL T REMY,KEITH D=&KATHLEEN MYRA STAMMEL 136 3RD ST 544 RISING HILL DR 10 ARAPAHO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8535 FAIRBORN,OH 45324---5917 NAPLES,FL 34113-7977 RICHARD,LYN RIVES,OMAIDA RIX,GALENA M SYLVAIN BRUNEAU CARMEN RIVES 287 BENSON ST 281 ST-LUC#1 18 SANTA FE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 QUEBEC,QC NAPLES,FL 34113---7979 CANADA, GIN 2S4---0000 ROBBINS,JOHN R ROBERTSTAD,KARK E RODRIGUEZ,IRIS DANIEL J ROBBINS BETTY ROBERTSTAD 343 BENSON ST 2 CHEROKEE TRL 29 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--8556 MAPLES,FL 34113--7916 NAPLES,FL 34113---7943 RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA,MARTHA M ROLF,ESTHER T ROWLEY,KELLY J=&BRENDA J 134 2ND ST MICHAEL WALSH 264 PORTER ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8534 15 NATCHEZ TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8542 NAPLES,FL 34113-7969 RUSSELL,JOHN=&LORRAINE RUTH A WINKER REVOCABLE TRUST RUTH A WINKLER REV LIV TRUST 200 BENSON ST UTD 08/04/08 6 BUTTERFIELD TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 8083 PALOMINO DR NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113--2684 S&L SOHLMAN FAMILY REV TRUST SALVATORE,CHRISTINE SAMSON,JEAN GUY 3 NATCHEZ TRAIL MELISSA INSKIP JEANNINE MARCOTTE YVES SAMSON NAPLES,FL.34113--0000 I . TERESA SALVATORE 25 CIMMARON TRAIL 546 CAVERLY DR NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 BRIGANTINE,NJ 08203-2820 SANDERS,GARY=&SANDRA SCHLAGETER,STANLEY B SCHLAGETER,STANLEY B MELISSA SANDERS 39 NAVAJO TRAIL 8417 OLD BOUNDARY RD MARK SANDERS NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 LOUISVILLE,KY 40291--0000 152 DES BOULEAUXLES COTEAUX,QC CANADA, J7X 1A2-0000 rte. SCHUH,ALLAN J SCHULZ ET AL,SANDRA L SCOTT EST,THEODORE PATRICIA A SCHUH 4252 SHOREWOOD DR 4 CHISHOLM TRL 18APACHETRL ROCKFORD,IL 61101---9369 NAPLES,FL 34113---7973 NAPLES,FL 34113-7965 Etiquettes faciles h peter 1 Repliez a la hachure afin de I www avery.com ..� -_--.- -- :, wvnv�ratan® I Sens de rA:.e1ew 1n rohnni pnn_Onni ! 1-800-G0-AVERY ! -Easy Peel® Labels i • MM. Bend along line to crl AIRY® 5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® j Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up EdgeT"' j SCOTT,LOUISE HELEN SEYMOUR JR,HOMER SHIFLET,RONALD E=&SANDRA L 268 BENSON ST RONALD SEYMOUR 8019 WATTERSON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---8540 33 CIMMARON TRL LOUISVILLE,KY 40291---1760 NAPLES,FL 34113---7933 ',-..., SLOSS,ELIZABETH D SLOSS SMEATHERS,DONALD A SMITH,DONALD CONNIE L RAMSEY PATRICIA K SMEATHERS 4 ABILENE TRL 105 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD 113 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS RD NAPLES,FL 34113--7970 NAPLES,FL 34113---7960 NAPLES,FL 34113-7960 SMITH,DONALD JAMES SMITH,DONALD JAMES SOHLMAN JR TR,EVERT F MARJORIE LOUISE SMITH MARJORIE LOUISE SMITH CLAIRE JO SOHLMAN TR 14 ARAPAHO TRAIL 21 ABILENE TRL E&C JO SOHLAMN LIV TRUST NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113--7945 UTD 12/13/949 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7986 SOLOMAN,SHARON ANN SOMMERS,RONALD E=&JUDY K SOUTHWEST BLVD HOLDINGS LLC WILLIAM H SOLOMAN 1 OSAGE TRL 19275 W CAPITOL DR STE 100 24 CHEROKEE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7938 BROOKFIELD,WI 53045---2744 NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 SOUTHWEST BLVD HOLDINGS LLC SOUTHWEST BLVD HOLDINGS LLC SPRAKER,JOHN=&KIMBERLY MARIE 19275 W CAPITOL DR STE 100 19275 W CAPITOL DR STE 100 30 CHEYENNE TRL BROOKFIELD,WI 53045---2744 BROOKFIELD,WI 53045--2744 NAPLES,FL 34113-7923 ST GERMAIN,ROBERT G STEPHENSON,ANNE STETLER,JOHN MARYLOU ST GERMAIN 1 TWINKLING CT 11 MULESHOE TRL 14 APACHE TRL BLUFFTON,SC 29909--6203 NAPLES,FL 34113--7947 NAPLES,FL 34113---7965 STEWART,BILLY E STINFIL,MARIE STONE ET AL,KENNETH P DIXIE L STEWART 314 PORTER ST BOX 438 SHERRY L BELL NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 COOPER CLIFF,ON 9 CHEROKEE TRL CANADA, POM 1NO--0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-7926 STOYANOVA,HRISTINA STRINGER,GRACE V STUCKEY,CAROL J ZDRAVKO STOYANOV 32 ABILENE TRL 145 2ND ST '.},FL 34.113---8550 22.3 BENSON ST Z 33 dens6i? ��� I NAPLES,FL 34113-7900 NQP�/�L 3���3 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 _ SULLIVAN,PATRICIA J SULLIVAN,RICHARD J SUTPHIN,EDWARD B 126 3RD ST 9 SANTA FE TRL NANCY A SUTPHIN NAPLES,FL 34113-8535 NAPLES,FL 34113-7919 56 SUNNY ACRES SETH,WV 25181--9564 SWAN,MAX 0 TATE,MICHAEL J TATTOLI,PAULA RUTH A SWAN NICOLE N TATE LINDA L SILVA 825 N HINTZ RD 1 SPANISH TRAIL DIANE M LOESNER OWOSSO,MI 48867--8406 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 TIMOTHY A FLETCHER1 CHEYENNE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-7943 Etiquettes faciles a peter 1 Repliez 3 la hachure afro del wwuvaverycom i rtaic.In naharit nvFRY®S1fin® i _`Sens dews reveler le rebord Pop-UpTm 1 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel® Labels i • try Bend along line to A�/ERY® 5160® Use Avery®Template 5160® 1 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up Edge"' j 1 TAYLOR,DONALD M TECRONEY,PAUL D=&SHEILA R TELFORT,ENISE JEANNE A TAYLOR 286 PORTER ST 291 BENSON ST ,-^"'4R4 EASTGATE VILLAGE DR NAPLES,FL 34113---8542 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 SVILLE,KY 40223--4786 THOMPSON,JAMES L=&MEREDITH A TIMBURY,PATRICIA S F TODHUNTER,DESNEIGES M 33 ABILENE TRL DAVID S FLAD CHARLES C TODHUNTER NAPLES,FL 34113--7904 ROBERTA F VIGNEAULT 2003 OVERBROOK ORES LAURA F NELSONPO BOX 28 SUDBURY,ON WOODSTOCK,NH 03293---0028 CANADA, P3A 5J5-0000 TREJO LORA,CARLA M TREMBLAY,MAURICE TRUHLSEN,WILLIAM C 220 PORTER ST GAETANE GAGNE JOAN R TRUHLSEN NAPLES,FL 34113--8542 1295 GUERARD 28 ABILENE TRL ALMA,QC NAPLES,FL 34113---7970 CANADA, G8B 6K7---0000 TURCOTTE,GILLES TUTTLE SR,JAMES L=&VONCILE TUYA,FRANK LOUISE HEBERT 1291 ROGANA RD 133 2ND ST 1860 RUE DAUMIER BETHPAGE,TN 37022---8611 NAPLES,FL 34113--8550 JONQUIERE,QC CANADA, G7Z 1 P9--0000 TVETEN,CHRISTIAN UMPENHOUR,KRISTOPHER E VELLEFF,ELIZABETH B 290 PORTER ST SHEILA UMPENHOUR 4451 GARDNER DR NAPLES,FL 34113-8542 112 4TH ST PORT CHARLOTTE,FL 33952-9728 NAPLES,FL 34113-8536 r. VELOSO,HECTOR VERMETTE,MIREILLE VEZINA,MICHEL ZOA ELIDA PALLAIS ROMAIN CARON LISE COTE 16 ARAPAHO TRL ROBERT BOIVIN MARC VEZINA NAPLES,FL 34113---7977 ERIC CARON2 APACHE TRL 13 ABILENE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7965 NAPLES,FL 34113---7945 VILLASENOR,MANUEL=&ISABEL VILLASENOR,MANUEL=&ISABEL VISICALE,JOSEPHINE 251 BENSON ST 251 BENSON ST 20 CIMMARON TRL NAPLES,FL 34113-8541 NAPLES,FL 34113--8541 NAPLES,FL 34113-7940 VOULIGNY,GEORGE WAGNER,MELANIE A WALKER,ROBERT R=&NANCY A. HUGUETfE LEMOINE [[ n 24 NAVAJO TRL 4699 NW COUNTY ROAD 141 A,� 7 a/m , 1 k': JENNiNT S,Fr--32 053---3130 111-BHREFO�'=:MNS RD ��� ��I T Q NAPLES,FL 34113---7939 �` � 313th NAPLES,FL 34113---0000 spe p I�1G1S,t t.. 3Z 3— WALSH,KATHLEEN L WARNE,WM E WELLS,BRIAN TAMMY A BURNS DOROTHY M WARNE 316 BENSON ST 18 CHEYENNE TRL MARJORIE L TUNNEY NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 NAPLES,FL 34113-7922 29 NAVAJO TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7976 WELSH,NEIL C WELSH,NEIL C WESLEY,SCOTT J SONJA L WELSH SONJA L WELSH 15155 BOICHOT RD 29 OREGON TRL 22 CHEROKEE TRAIL LANSING,MI 48906--1005 NAPLES,FL 34113---7905 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 Etiquettes faciles peter 1 A Repliez a la hachure afn de; www.avery.com I Itilica,la naharit AVERY®516n® Sens de le rebord Pop-Upna I 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel®Labels I • s Bend along line to I /0 AVERY® 5160® I Use Avery®Template 5160® 1 Feed Paper ��� expose Pop-Up EdgeTF' j A SON WISEMAN,CARL M=&SHIRLEY A WISEMAN,VICKI LYNN WILSON,PAMELA E 259 L BENSON ST 2 SPANISH TRL 4194 MINERS CANDLE PL NAPLES,FL 34113---8541 NAPLES,FL 34113--7994 CASTLE ROCK,CO 80109-0000 WOLFENSON,LOUIS B WOLFENSON,LOUIS B WOODLEY,FRANKLIN DONNA WOODLEY 16 OREGON TRL B PECOS TRL NAPLES,FL 34113---7966 8 CHEROKEE TRAIL NAPLES,FL 34113---7972 NAPLES,FL 34113-0000 WOODLEY, WOODWORTH,RICHARD L YENTES,VIVIAN DONNA WOODLEY FRANKLIN OODLEY KATHRYN J WOODWORTH REBECCA GOLEMBISKI 10 MULESHOE TRL 7873 S SUGAR ISLAND RD 22 OSAGE TRL NAPLES,FL 34113--7978 CHEBANSE,IL 60922---0000 NAPLES,FL 34113---7971 ZENZ,THOMAS J=&SUSAN L ZENZ,THOMAS J=&SUSAN LYNN ZENZ.THOMAS J SUSAN L ZENZ 285 PRICE ST 285 PRICE ST NAPLES,FL 34113-8438 285 PRICE ST NAPLES,FL 34113--8438 NAPLES,FL 34113-8438 ZICK,VERL DALE Cove Apartments East Naples Civic Association SANDRA M ZICK 3823 Tamiami Trail East, PMB#274 12 BUTTERFIELD TRIAL 11400 Whistler's Cove Blvd. Naples,FL 34112 NAPLES,FL 34113--0000 Naples,FL 34113 Etiquettes faciles a paler 1 Repliez a la hachure afin del www.avery.com 1 Sens de reveler le rebord Pop-Up", � 1-800-GO-AVERY Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160® 1 chargement ) A �-. NIM Summary Vincentian GMPA—MPUD (GMPA-PL-20130001767/CP-2013-10) (PUDZ-PL-20130001726) July 17, 2014 South County Regional Library Note: This is a summary of the NIM. A verbatim recorded is also provided. The verbatim record denotes all questions raised by attendees and responses to those questions. Attendees: On behalf of Applicant: Robert Mulhere, Rich Yovanovich, Christopher Shucart County Staff: Kay Deselem, Corby Schmitt Approximately 18 members of the public attended. At 5:35 PM, Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the other consultants, the applicant, and County staff. Mr. Mulhere explained the NIM process, provided an overview of project, including what is being requested and the existing PUD permitted uses. Mr. Mulhere also went over the proposed PUD master plan, include location for development, stormwater lake, preserve, and project access. Mr. Mulhere also explained the process for review and approval of the GMPA and the PUD Amendment, to export fill for US 41 improvements, changing from golf course community to lake community has resulted in excess fill, briefly identified projects anticipated to take additional fill. The members of the public who identified themselves where either from the adjacent Hitching Post RV Park or from Trail Acres, an adjacent platted single family development. There were numerous questions related to site design and uses. The most significant issue of concern was related to affordable housing. There was significant opposition expressed to any additional affordable or subsidized housing in this area. Mr. Mulhere indicated that the applicant had n intention of building affordable housing and was willing to put a condition or limitation in the PUD that would restrict the housing to market rate. The meeting concluded at 6:30 PM. Page 1 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\NIM Summary 7-23-2014.docx a _O H V� CO v a U) —. 0\ a (C U `,` .-2 r-i E E U 'a Q .N cu w en c s o o _ �' 1111 E C CU E W L C U N = 4-, CU CU C r; ft-t\ o c, W N o o v o `er J� m tn. p L ! h1111 ` g%`•-, 1 . N 44 O 1-1 t E °° " a � u T •� M � rvJ N V ; Q T = ,. M {� , \ ______H.W Q c., & •,\\., cs,j W = v � � N � � Z n Z � w ; =o = �� '' . 1 1 A U N Y Fri 0 Z • CU CU • 0 - ..t ---. el `al \. ENC) CNC) CJ w • o � C �VJ 4 CDU W r � u WHO N C o o V 8 ,Li y0 U f0 C i . ? 0 `I - ▪ Q fII F^ CU CU °J V 0 v BD.0 L CU ZH y >. C 1 fff LL CU 4-, 3 J ••1 Q\as II4 v �J\1 .f a o '41 1 3 .. ., 4 s..,__,_ 1:_ ts,_ __.,,, ,, r I 4,, \ � --, 1 r' ■ C a t U) y Y 0 I---) .....\ 41 t6 u L.. Q) 't-1 E E u .a ■ c O 0 C o < , Cr) .c _ c o o '47-; r O ° L *' E _o v 0. i N ti 4:1 o 0 •I vi E N C W '7 s co av ; c a c m •° Ns "O O L ns o r ___. Z O c, 0 @ t - W Z) 70 E N a) N O o o c) 7 C C C LL Y W N O L o 0 3 U) c c v �j 00 I f) }{ o r3 C U G I r H HI rI `n �' C C _ �--+ r'-I Z 4! C c ,� �' O u a, ON W W * E ' to ' u Z4„, QNu .� _z "= g � Fri �fl �� L Q U N H W r-{ Z v = . r^J N - b E a.) O 7 "4 — 7 aO 0 v_ S'(�J F--1 F� W F-I U1 -a C C •L ' i/ O CO Z � Wa � CV � L //c1 - pt )--J 4-4 .0 13 O � Zg �• vsc 1� � a�i v ' p x Z}}}II��F.��JJ ..���.��{ u55G 3 u O .ti r 4.4 L T C O y 3 V 0 W , y ++ 0 u N co C ° .B 7 / z r ,-- { o v 3 O /0.Z O u u, C . O N Q v N Q v N v N u L H =O -o Ou - o CU C a v ++ ca 3 0 o ate, -C .0 Z , v N _ '3 ° N E o -a C7 ° 8 � . v y ✓ o _c L 1 x 1 lk"1/ VINCENTIAN PUDA/GMPA ,-„-... NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Date and Time: July 17,2014 at 5:30pm Location: Collier County South Regional Library,Meeting Room"A" 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway,Naples, Florida 34113 Existing Approved Uses: The site presently zoned PUD and allows for approximately 8 acres of commercial uses including hotel, retail office and personal services uses. The PUD also allows for residential development at 4 units per acre, and Adult Living Facilities (ALFs). Summary of Proposed Changes: GMPA: The applicant is requesting to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to create the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68± acres, and is located on the south/west side of U.S. 41/Tamiami Trail East, as shown below. RSF-3I I I CPUDr 'i ,�'I'/ y��,y\�Jy,,, , = . • `�± JLYRESC_. , /—\ WOODS ® ,Y ••� s - $11111■111111111\� aiI 1 1lh1111111\r P�s • ∎4TREE TOPS G.r WHISTLERS COVE COLLIER COUNTY PUG PROPERTY tiff:I PUD .rA A ZONING I� NM Abik. alabla ,' TRAIL ACRES ,' = - ��` ' RSF-4% ♦S = r SUBJECT PARCEL COMMUNITY PARK ,: '.'I���,'�•♦�I♦�♦.4�- VINCENTUW 2 ' P ZONING =•., ,ice�1��p���♦♦� /.��� ♦ r' NM NB ,11111F 0 • ',, 4,,� ,AM„ EN, Pei* LE • WENTWORTH ESTATES �'TRAI LACRES 4 I RSF-4 ,, , 111i, I 11 MOBILE HOME PARK # Qs.4 MH , �'" �, PUD TTRVC Ai ill' HITCHING POST TRAVEL TRAILER PAR 111*/IMIS$ . MU \ /4•1.1 /VICTORIA FALLS /..., Page 1 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\vincentian NIM Handout 7-17-2014.docx The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for a mixture of neighborhood or community commercial development; residential development; and other employment generating uses such as corporate headquarters. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and potentially allow for office uses that would provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In addition, the Subdistrict provides the alternative of residential or mixed use development. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The Subdistrict allows all those commercial uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, both by right and as conditional uses, with the exception of the following prohibited uses: 1. Pawn shops (5932), 2. Adult book stores, adult video rental or sales, or any other use that is defined as a "sexually oriented business"in the Collier County Code of Laws, 26-151 et seq., 3. Animal specialty services except veterinary(0752); except outside kenneling and dog grooming are permitted, 4. Automatic merchandising machine operators (5962), 5. Correctional institutions (9223), 6. Crematories (7261), 7. Farm product raw materials (5153-5159), 8. Fishing, commercial(0912-0919), 9. Fuel dealers (5983-5989), 10. Homeless shelters and soup kitchens, 11. Installation or erection of building equipment contractors (1796), 12. Local and suburban passenger transportation(4131-4173), 13. Marinas (4493 &4499) , 14. Motor vehicle dealers,used only(5521), 15. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified (7299), Coin operated service machine operations, Comfort station operation, Escort service, Locker rental, Massage parlors (except those employing licensed therapists), Rest room operation, Tattoo parlors, Turkish baths,Wedding chapels,privately operated, 16. Power laundries, family and commercial(7211), and 17. Transfer stations (4212). The Subdistrict includes the following additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses will be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet, a hotel (max. FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility(max. FAR 0.6). 2. Residential will be limited to a maximum density of 11.74 units/acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the project, inclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. 3. A single (one) automobile service station may be permitted anywhere within the Subdistrict. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility may be permitted. Page 2 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\Vincentian NIM Handout 7-17-2014.docx 4. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. PUDA: A PUD Amendment has been submitted as a companion to the GMP Amendment explained above. The PUD Amendment is necessary to establishes zoning on the property that allows the uses and includes the limitations contained in the in the Vincentian Subdistrict, including the following (see the PUD Master Plan attached: • A 4.5± acre preserve on site located so as to buffer the adjacent residential uses from the project development; • A 41 acre lake, also located so as to buffer the adjacent properties from the development; • All required landscape buffers; Page 3 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\Vincentian NIM Handout 7-17-2014.docx Ablative Vegetation and Open Space `�\S ZONING Existing Native Vegetation 29.77 Ac. GAS / WHISTLER'S Min On-site Native Preservation Req'd \ 20'TYPE "D" (Commercial) \ STATION COVE- PUD 29.77 x15%=4.46 Ac. LANDSCAPE Min On-site Native Preservation Req'd VACANT ' ^ -*-. (Residential or Mixed-Use) ! \ BUFFER \ 29.77x254°=7.44 Ac. Min Open Space Req'd.(Comm.or Mixed-Use) ' •\ ` 30.68x30% =9.20 Ac' 7 '. // // • \ Min Open Space Required(Residential) />. 30.68x60% =18.41Ac > y# ''-2' TYPE"D" •\ '� - '9\ / `� LANDSCAPE `♦♦ �'o l!927i \\ TRAIL ACMES \ o s /�.• / 5 44 / BUFFER ,�OS7/ �i` `• o 200 400 RSF-4`ZONING,/ ��0,,,, \, 5 4. , �♦ TRACT "MU" 10' TYPE"A" \ ■ At/ EXISTING 15'U.E. LANDSCAPE--� _ I— . MIXED USE BUFFER ° Q EXISTING 15'U.E.---il z a (-' ♦ i = nJ.mZ I ° VZ �� �•. '/ \ • 15' TYPE "B" 15'TYPE "B" = N �cs1 y`; �♦ LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE N. �'T>✓ % / BUFFER ,,�,, i BUFFER. z ® / W Q Denotes Location dl.Requested '♦ p 0 2 0 LL 0 Deviations. Deviation`�2 Will Occur' ` TRACT ,,1-,, Ur i _ Throughout the PUD. TRACT z 2 PRESERVE z _ Y L Umcc Land Use Summary %z ,/7-%,, EXISTING 15'U. LAKE I 5 a. Description Acreage Percent / Mixed-Use(Tract MU) 22.05 71.9% EXISTING 15'U.E. Lake(Tract L) 4.17 13;6%a i' • Preserve(Tract P) 4.46 14.5% EXISTING 15'U.E. TOTAL 30.68 100.0%° / II TRAIL ACRES RSF=4 ZONING Maximum Dwelling Units:360 Commercial Uses:Maximum of 250,000 SF, Andlor a hotel at 0.6 FAR,maximum of 150 rooms, And/or an ALFat0.6 FAR DIVA M. D�01/2D14 950 Encore Way VINCENTIAN MPUD ORA m. °4� 01�2D14 Naples,FL.34110 Phone:(239)254-2000 MASTER PLAN ° Ati. °U1/2014 .rte. HOLE MONTES Florida Certificate of �Nip HMT200 FNGUJEFRNUNIR3SUREIORS Authorization No.1772 EXHIBIT C 6/16/2014. Page 4 of 4 H:\2013\2013043\WP\NIM\Vincentian NIM Handout 7-17-2014.docx TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Naples, Florida July 17, 2014 The following Neighborhood Information Meeting was held at the Collier County South Regional Library, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples , Florida, commencing at 5: 30 p.m. Present: Christopher Shucart, Developer Bob Mulhere, Hole-Montes P1 Key Deselem, Planner Corby Schmidt, County Rich Yovanovich, Esquire ALSO PRESENT: Approximately 25 attendees . 3 } I 1 TAKEN BY: CHERIE' R. NOTTINGHAM Certified Professional Court Reporter Gregory Court Reporting, Inc. 2650 Airport Road South Naples, Florida 34112 (239)774-4414 F ED COP 2 1 MR. MULHERE: okay, can you hear me okay? 2 Good. 3 My name is Bob Mulhere. First of all , 4 thank you for coming. I know everybody has a 5 busy schedule and I'm glad you showed some 6 interest and that you' re able to attend. 7 My name is Bob Mulhere. I work for a 8 company called Hole Montes . It's a civil 9 engineering and planning company with offices 10 in Naples for, I don't know, since 1966. The 11 company' s been here a long time. 12 My client is Chris shucart, and Chris owns 13 the property that we' re going to talk about. 14 And here comes Rich Yovanovich right now. 15 And Rich is our land use attorney on the 16 project. we'll introduce him. oh, Rich 17 Yovanovich, welcome, welcome. 18 Also here tonight from the county, Kay 19 Deselem, who is the planner reviewing the 20 project, zoning elements of the project. And 21 corby is the comprehensive planning staff 22 member who will be reviewing one of the other 23 petitions we have, which is comprehensive 24 planning. corby Schmidt. And then they can 25 answer questions that maybe I -- while I 3 1 probably would try to answer them, some 2 questions are better for the staff. So I ' ll 3 defer to them as it comes up. 4 By way of very quick background, I worked 5 for the county for almost 15 years . 14 years . 6 I left the county in 2001, so I've been in the 7 private sector doing -- I've continued to do a 8 lot of work for the county in terms of planning 9 consultation for other counties in Southwest 10 Florida, preparing land use plans, but I also 11 work for private sector clients too, and that' s 12 what I'm doing here tonight. 13 So these neighborhood information 14 meetings , I don't know if you've been to one 15 before, really, developers who are smart 16 wouldn't need a rule to require them to do 17 this, they would do it anyway. Because nobody 18 would really want to be surprised getting to a 19 public hearing and find out that there's a 20 roomful of people in opposition, when perhaps 21 simply having a meeting before the hearing 22 would allow the developer to explain what he' s 23 asking for, allow the neighbors to understand 24 what's being asked for and allow the developer 25 to hear any concerns and then think about how 4 1 they might adjust and react to those concerns . 2 But a while back now, 20 -- maybe in 2000 3 whatever, the county, rewrote this requirement 4 for a neighborhood information meeting. So you 5 have to have this neighborhood information 6 meeting and you have to have it prior to the 7 public hearings starting. And you have to wait 8 until the staff has had a chance to review the 9 project a little bit. You can't have it real 10 early because things can change during the 11 review process. so kind of falls in after the 12 staff has done a substantive review but before 13 the public hearings occur. 14 we are asking for -- oh, by the way, this 15 is Cherie' . she' s a court reporter. The 16 county has us record these. we used to just 17 record them on a tape recorder. The county' s 18 gotten a little more particular about it, and I 19 can understand why. It' s a little bit harder 20 for some staff member to have to listen to a 21 crackly old tape recorder and try to understand 22 what' s going on. Then they say we' re not going 23 to listen to it anymore, you can listen to 24 them, but want a summary. And we said, hey, 25 this is kind of hard. So Cherie' will record 5 1 the meeting, I'll try to remember to speak 2 slowly and she'll tell me if I don't. And when 3 you ask a question, if you could just say your 4 name and spell it, unless it's smith. 5 we' re asking for two types of petitions. 6 The first is a GMP or a comprehensive plan 7 amendment. In Florida every city and county 8 has a comprehensive plan, and it's very sort of 9 high level . If you think about it, it's kind 10 of like the Constitution for the united States . 11 it sets policies and it says where certain 12 types of development should occur and where 13 certain types of development should not occur, 14 where rural lands are, where agricultural lands 15 are. 16 This land is within the urban area, as you 17 can appreciate. You all know where it is, it's 18 just off u.s. 41, East Naples. so the land is 19 designated urban. 20 it does not, though -- and it has zoning 21 on it right now. It' s zoned PUD. And that's a 22 planned unit development. And a planned unit 23 development is sort of like a document that 24 sets zoning on a particular piece of land. You 25 could have straight zoning which in the Land 6 1 Development code provides a list of uses and 2 development standards , or you can develop your 3 own list of uses and your own standards and go 4 to the Board and get it approved through 5 zoning. 6 And that happened years ago. That's where 7 were the name vincentian comes from originally. 8 when this was approved it was owned by the 9 Diocese of Venice. And Venice, vincentian, 10 that' s where the name comes from. There have 11 been several owners since that point in time, 12 at least two, but the name has been retained. 13 The PUD right now allows residential uses 14 and commercial uses. But it' s got limitations. 15 Obviously the commercial uses, right now the 16 PUD limits it to about eight acres. obviously 17 if you' re going to build commercial and you' re 18 limited to eight acres on an approximately 30 19 and a half acre site, you' re going to put that 20 along 41. 21 The residential use is limited to four 22 units an acre. And typically under this PUD 23 and typically the way it was years ago when 24 this got approved, you would calculate that 25 density on everything except the commercial . 7 1 So you wouldn't be able to count it as 2 commercial acres. 3 As my client has owned the land over a 4 period of time and looked for opportunities to 5 find either a partner, a joint venture or an 6 individual interested in the land to develop it 7 for either the commercial use or the 8 residential use, it became clear that there 9 were issues with what was allowed in terms of 10 the marketplace. The commercial use sort of 11 drives a different -- kind of a strip pattern 12 of development. It doesn't allow for 13 flexibility of design, doesn't allow for a 14 larger commercial use if somebody was 15 interested in one, doesn't allow for something 16 unique in terms of a mixture of uses , 17 residential and commercial . And because of the 18 cost of the land and the small size, this 19 project does not lend itself and therefore 20 there's been no market for low density 21 development such as single-family. 22 Before -- on 20 acres -- I' ll go to 23 questions in just a minute. 24 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Can you 25 repeat that? 8 1 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. I said because of the 2 relative small size and you' re talking about in 3 the neighborhood of 80 or 90 dwelling units , 4 this does not lend itself to a single-family 5 development. You don't have enough land to 6 amenitize (sic) it properly and sell it at a 7 market rate. Therefore there's been no buyers . 8 There' s been a lot of lookers but no buyers at 9 that low density. 10 Frankly, if there' s been any kind of 11 attraction for the property, it's been folks 12 that might want to look at a higher kind of a 13 density such as an affordable housing project 14 or an adult living facility, which wouldn't be 15 affordable but would enjoy a higher number of 16 units. 17 we don't propose to develop it under an 18 affordable housing scenario, getting a density 19 bonus for that. As you know, there' s already a 20 pretty significant affordable housing 21 development across the street. 22 we would like to see this developed at 23 market rate and we' re willing to commit to that 24 as part of our proposal . 25 so what we' re asking for in the Growth 9 1 Management Plan is to allow for up to 360 2 dwelling units on the property and up to 3 250,000 square feet of retail commercial , or a 4 mixture of the two. 5 Now, I want you to understand that does 6 not mean that we would be able to do all that 7 commercial plus all that residential . Because 8 we have an overriding cap. And what the county 9 likes to use to limit development, they want -- 10 they understand the need for flexibility in the 11 marketplace. They want to give flexibility. 12 But the way that we' re able to -- that 13 they' re able to regulate the degree of 14 intensity, the amount that you can develop, and 15 their concern is traffic. so you do a traffic 16 study and then they limit you to no more than a 17 certain number of trips at peak hour. And I 18 don't know that exact number, but there is a 19 limit. And that limit, whatever mixture we 20 use, if we do some residential , some 21 commercial , all commercial , all residential , 22 however we do it, we can't exceed that trip 23 count, that certain number of trips. 24 In order to have these changes occur, we 25 first have to amend the comprehensive plan. 10 1 And that' s a two-step process. The first step 2 is what' s called transmittal . we have a 3 hearing date for August 21st for the 4 comprehensive plan for transmittal of this -- 5 for the Planning Commission, before the Collier 6 County Planning Commission, and then the Board 7 would be for October, I believe. 8 Transmittal is -- gives a chance for the 9 Planning Commission and the Board to take a 10 look at what we' re proposing, determine whether 11 they support it, determine if there's any 12 changes that they feel are necessary, and then 13 work with us at that hearing. And if they 14 approve it, they would then transmit it to the 15 State Department of Economic Opportunity. used 16 to be the Department of Community Affairs , but 17 under the current Governor that all got changed 18 a few years ago and now it's Department of 19 Economic Opportunity. so they'll transmit it. 20 That's why it's called a transmittal . 21 The state will look at it. If they don't 22 have any objections within 30 days , they don't 23 have to say -- as long as they don't have 24 objections, 30 days go by and we don't hear 25 anything from them, we'll know by the fact that 11 1 they haven't said anything that there are no 2 objections. 3 we can then work on making any changes 4 that the Board discusses during transmittal and 5 then getting final review of the zoning 6 document, which is the PUD, which will be a 7 companion to the Growth Management Plan 8 Amendment, and those will go together to the 9 adoption hearing. 10 And if we go to the Board in October for 11 transmittal , we' re probably talking in the 12 range of February for the adoption hearings, 13 which would also be the zoning. You can't 14 rezone the property inconsistent with the 15 comprehensive planning, so we have to go 16 through that process either simultaneous or 17 first. In this case it will be simultaneous. 18 In fact, they' ll actually approve or hear the 19 comp. plan on the same agenda, but they'll 20 approve it first and approve the zoning after. 21 Because you have to do it in that order. 22 I 'm sure there's a number of things I 23 forgot. Let me just go over the handout rather 24 quickly so that -- you probably haven't had a 25 chance to digest it, and if you look at it and 12 1 have questions. 2 what I've given you is a summary of 3 what -- of the changes that we' re proposing. 4 And we are expressly listing 17 uses in our 5 Growth Management Plan Amendment that will be 6 prohibited uses. so I just want to be clear, 7 because people sometimes miss that word, that 8 this list of 17 uses here will be expressly 9 prohibited in our Growth Management Plan 10 Amendment. 11 And then the next paragraph has some 12 additional restrictions, and I talked to you 13 about those restrictions in terms of the 14 maximum square footage and so on, so forth. 15 so I'm sure you' re going to have some 16 questions tonight. And we'll try our best to 17 respond to those questions and listen to any 18 concerns that you may have. 19 I want to go over and just take a minute 20 to go over the Puy master plan with you. But I 21 also want to say that if you do have any 22 questions, you can either call me -- I left my 23 business cards in the car but I'll go get them 24 at the end of the meeting, I'll bring them 25 back -- or you can call Kay at the county or 13 1 Corby Schmidt and we'll try to answer any 2 questions that you have. If you got a notice 3 of this, my number is in that too. 4 so this is an aerial . I'm sure some of 5 you had a chance to take a look at it. It 6 shows you where the property is right here. 7 Hitching Post and Trail Acres . 8 This is the PUS master plan. There's a 9 couple of I think important points I want to 10 make. 11 we've strategically located -- the county 12 requires that a developer preserve a certain 13 percent of vegetation on the site; 15 percent 14 is commercial , 25 percent is residential or 15 mixed use. we've located that to buffer us 16 from the residential development. The county 17 only requires a 15-foot landscape buffer 18 between these uses , but what we've done is 19 built that up by building our preserve in here. 20 And we've already had the discussions with 21 staff and they' re supportive of the location of 22 the preserve. And I think we've actually had a 23 preserve that's actually gotten jurisdictional 24 permits. 25 This is over a 100-foot width in this 14 1 location. so we' re going to have a much more 2 robust preserve than folks typically have for a 3 50-foot landscape buffer. we still have to 4 provide that landscape buffer, but in addition 5 we'll have the preserve. 6 And on this side next to the Hitching 7 Post, we've located -- there's some preserves 8 in here and then we've located our lake here, 9 so there's a lot of separation pushing these 10 uses closer to Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami 11 Trail away from the residential . 12 one more thing, and i'll go right to 13 questions. 14 This right here is the Hitching Post 15 Plaza, so we have commercial right here. 16 okay, I think that's it. I'm open for 17 questions. 18 Yes , ma'am. 19 MS. KELLY: what was on the -- 20 THE COURT REPORTER: May I have your name, 21 please. 22 MR. MULHERE: Wait, what was your name, 23 please? 24 MS. KELLY: I'm sorry. Rosemary Kelly. 25 K-E-L-L-Y. 15 1 How many feet is that tract by the lake? 2 Because it's backing right up. 3 MR. MULHERE: This lake right here? 4 MS. KELLY: Yes. 5 MR. MULHERE: This is approximately -- 6 MS. KELLY: Not there. 7 MR. MULHERE: Hang on. I'm going to give 8 you a perspective. This is -- one inch equals 9 100 feet out here. So this is maybe 120 or 150 10 feet, 130 feet. So if you look at that, you' re 11 at least 200 foot. In this case, I don't know, 12 400 feet. 13 MR. SHUCART: Maybe not that the far. 14 MR. MULHERE: well , one, two, three, 300 15 feet. 16 MS. KELLY: You' re misunderstanding the 17 question. 18 MR. MULHERE: Oh, I'm sorry. 19 MS. KELLY: The question is , I see the 20 Hitching Post. 21 MR. MULHERE: Yes . 22 MS. KELLY: How far from the Hitching Post 23 is the barrier to the lake? 24 MR. MULHERE: You mean where does the lake 25 start? 16 1 MS. KELLY: Thank you. 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, I'm sorry. 3 That's -- well , this is 15. 4 MS. KELLY: Less than 25 feet -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, this is 15 right 6 there, so I'd say 25, 30 feet. 7 MS. KELLY: Do you realize that we' re in a 8 flood zone? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. That's actually going 10 to help. 11 MS. KELLY: Help you or help us? 12 MR. MULHERE: No, it's going to help you. 13 MS. KELLY: How's that going to happen? 14 MR. MULHERE: Presently there is no water 15 management on the site. There's no water. 16 MS. KELLY: I know -- 17 MR. MULHERE: So the South Florida Water 18 Management District permits the site, has 19 already permitted the site, requires us to 20 retain our water on the site. We can't let 21 that water go off our site and onto your 22 property. we have to design this to retain 23 that water at a minimum of a 25-year storm 24 event. Then you we' re allowed -- (inaudible) 25 just like you guys are -- who knows what 17 1 happened when you guys got done. But -- 2 MS. KELLY: But this is within the flood 3 zone currently. 4 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, everybody's in the 5 flood zone. 6 MS. KELLY: The middle of 41 -- 7 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about the 8 coastal high hazard area. 9 MS. KELLY: Right. 10 MR. MULHERE: But that has to do with 11 hurricane evacuation. It does not include 12 rainfall amounts and flood. That has to do 13 with hurricane evacuation. what we' re talking 14 about -- I thought you were talking about a 15 rain event causing water to rise. 16 So this will be designed. It will be 17 better. You will not have any flooding from 18 this property coming onto your property. None. 19 There's going to be a berm. There will be a 20 berm. You won't have any water. There' s no -- 21 MS. KELLY: Did you walk that property? 22 MR. MULHERE: Oh, yeah, I've been on the 23 property. 24 MS. KELLY: It's pretty soggy. 25 MR. MULHERE: I know. That' s -- trust me, 18 1 you are going to be -- 2 MS. KELLY: I trust you if you want to 3 move that lake over somewhere else. 4 MR. MULHERE: Well , it' s already permitted 5 in that location. It' s already permitted where 6 that jurisdiction is. South Florida water 7 Management and Corps of Engineers had to review 8 this and they did. 9 Now, you can have -- it won't be square 10 like that. It will be -- 11 MS. KELLY: I'm not worried about that 12 side. 13 MR. MULHERE: No, I understand. 14 This lake there helps you. The water' s 15 going to go into the lake, it' s not going to go 16 across the street. That actually helps you. 17 know it' s maybe a little hard to -- 18 MS. KELLY: Yeah, it is, to comprehend. 19 MR. MULHERE: It' s true. I don't have a 20 civil engineer here, but i' ll put you in touch 21 with him, if you want to talk to him. 22 So any other questions? 23 Must be a couple other questions . 24 MR. WESTERBELT: Steve westerbelt. 25 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry? 19 1 MR. MULHERE: Westerbelt. 2 MR. WESTERBELT: Westerbelt. 3 MR. MULHERE: W-E-S-T-E-R-B-E-L-D-T. 4 MR. WESTERBELT: No D. But the D is 5 common. 6 The entrances off the Southwest Boulevard, 7 the arrows there, there will be mostly like two 8 there, one by 41; is that the idea? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. Yes . 10 MR. WESTERBELT: Or not at that -- 11 MR. MULHERE: Yes, and the reason for that 12 is if -- if some of this is developed as 13 commercial and some of the back is developed as 14 residential , you'll want to have a separate 15 entrance for the commercial . You wouldn't want 16 people having to come all the way back for the 17 commercial and residential to have separate -- 18 MR. WESTERBELT: Okay. And then in the 19 area that's commercial to commercial where the 20 Hitching Post Plaza is right there, will that 21 be walled off or is it like flow through? 22 MR. MULHERE: It won 't be walled off. But 23 there is a requirement for a landscape buffer 24 and there's a requirement to permit -- the 25 Water Management permit requires a berm. So 20 1 you' re going to have a berm and a landscape 2 buffer. 3 MR. WESTERBELT: I just wanted to know if 4 the commercial tract will flow through. 5 MR. MULHERE: You know, it's a very good 6 point, and that' s a very good suggestion. 7 And the county, I don't know what -- 8 Chris, I'm not sure how that -- what that' s 9 like right here. 10 MR. SHUCART: well , there' s a large pump 11 station -- 12 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, I think there' s -- 13 MR. SHUCART: -- in that area. so you'd 14 have to go -- you'd have to go back around 15 there, sort of, which -- 16 MR. MULHERE: It' s a really -- the county 17 usually would like to see that (inaudible) they 18 pop from one commercial location to another. 19 They can walk. 20 MR. WESTERBELT: Right. 21 MR. MULHERE: But it' s a good question. 22 think there's utility improvements in the way. 23 MR. WESTERBELT: Pump station. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes , sir. 25 MR. LOVETT: Vernon Lovett. L-O-V-E-T-T. 21 1 How many acres would Tract L actually be? 2 MR. MULHERE: Oh, I got that right here. 3 Tract L is 4.17. 4 MR. LOVETT: Okay. On four, on page -- 5 Item 4 on Page 4, it says recreational site for 6 uses adjacent to RV park or mobile home park 7 may be developed on a maximum of three acres. 8 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, that's a good 9 question. 10 MR. LOVETT: okay, show us where that 11 three acres is. 12 MR. MULHERE: First of all , that's a good 13 question. Over the years there has been some 14 discussion about maybe -- 15 MR. LOVETT: We live there. 16 MR. MULHERE: You live there, okay, good. 17 So it would be probably in this area right 18 here. 19 MR. LOVETT: There's a pumping station 20 there. 21 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, on the other side of 22 it, though. You know, we'd have to -- I think 23 you can come around this way. There's the 24 ability to create access. It can't be where 25 the lake is so, you know, we do have lake views 22 1 from that recreation tract. 2 MR. LOVETT: So pumping station will not 3 be relocated. 4 MR. MULHERE: No. 5 MR. LOVETT: So if we were to ever in the 6 immediate future decide to purchase a little 7 bit of that, would it have frontage on 41? 8 MR. MULHERE: It' s conceivable that you 9 could. I just say that because the state has 10 to permit that. That's a state road and state 11 permits . 12 MR. LOVETT: Okay, so the biggest problem 13 with this kind of stuff is -- 14 MR. MULHERE: They'd be concerned about 15 the distance between these two, so you'd 16 probably have to share that access if you 17 wanted to share it. 18 MR. LOVETT: But we don't have direct 19 access from -- like riding golf carts . Because 20 the pumping station is -- 21 MR. MULHERE: So I see what you' re saying. 22 So somehow when we design it we need to create 23 a reasonable point of ingress and egress 24 between the two properties. 25 MR. LOVETT: we own some property there 23 1 that's used as a maintenance storage there. 2 It' s got water tanks. 3 will that be moved? 4 MR. MULHERE: I think we could design 5 it -- look, I'm not telling you that this lake 6 couldn't shift down. The permitting process 7 allows you to make minor modifications. So if 8 we need to get 20, 30 feet, you know, we could 9 do it. But you still have to go through the 10 process . You have to go over there and show 11 them and, you know, do all that kind of stuff. 12 MR. LOVETT: Because I think we envisioned 13 if we did this pump house thing, it would be 14 about where the tract is, there would only be a 15 notch in that property there. 16 MR. MULHERE: Here? 17 MS. KELLY: Up above. 18 MR. LOVETT: A little bit -- yeah. 19 MR. MULHERE: Well , I mean, we can cross 20 that bridge when we come to it. I mean, it's 21 not impossible to modify the permit and change 22 the configuration. I mean, it' s not an act of 23 God. we can do it, it's just everything takes 24 time and money. 25 MR. LOVETT: Can you give us a time 24 1 schedule that you think is reasonable for this 2 project to start developing? 3 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. Since we don't really 4 have an end user at this point and, as I said, 5 that's part of the reason for going through 6 this process. It' s an expensive process and 7 time consuming, so I just want everybody to 8 appreciate that it's costing a lot of money to 9 go through this. Nobody would do it if they 10 didn't feel like they have to. It's sort of 11 like having your fingernails pulled out. 12 But having said that, I mean, I would 13 defer to you, Chris. would you like to 14 hopefully within a couple of years have -- two 15 years? Because it's going to take us another 16 six or seven months to get through the -- 17 MR. LOVETT: The point of my question is 18 for us to lobby our board we have to have some 19 kind of time frame. 20 MR. MULHERE: We got it, we got it. I 21 would say two years minimum. 22 Unless -- you know, the market' s so crazy 23 out there right now. I mean, the demand is 24 very, very high. But it's all over the place. 25 MR. LOVETT: So you share our recreational 25 1 facilities? 2 MR. MULHERE: Right. 3 MR. LOVETT: And we' re in a position to 4 where that's uncertain -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Right. 6 MR. LOVETT: -- as you what' s going to 7 happen there for us . we would like to have -- 8 MR. MULHERE: You might not even need -- 9 you might need an acre and a half. 10 MR. LOVEii : It's a question about how 11 much money we want to borrow and whether our 12 300 people would vote for it. So we've got a 13 few -- 14 MR. MULHERE: Well , we put it in there, so 15 you guys let us know. 16 Mrs . Kelly? 17 MS. KELLY: Thank you. what would be the 18 time frame if we were to entertain something 19 like that? Would we be able to keep it 20 undeveloped or does it have to be totally 21 developed? Say you negotiate with Chris for a 22 piece of land in the future. 23 MR. MULHERE: No, you could buy the land. 24 You don't have to develop it. 25 MS. KELLY: Even though it's developing 26 1 all around us? 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, the use is permitted. 3 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, there would be some 4 coordination between the stormwater -- 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. But, I mean, you 6 don't have to develop it right away. 7 MS. KELLY: Just sit on it? 8 MR. MULHERE: I'm just saying, you have to 9 raise the money. You don't have to develop it. 10 This -- you could take a look at it, find 11 out what's the elevation. 12 Any other questions? 13 Yes, sir. 14 MR. GRIMES: Joe Grimes . 15 I notice that -- 16 THE COURT REPORTER: okay, I'm sorry, I'm 17 just not hearing him. 18 MR. GRIMES: (Inaudible.) 19 And then you turn it back and it says 20 service stations and fuel . So which is it? 21 MR. MULHERE: well , fuel dealers , if you 22 look at the SIC Code, that' s something 23 different than service stations . Fuel dealers 24 is a larger industrial kind of fuel dealer. 25 You wouldn't know that from looking at that, 27 1 but it' s based on that SIC Code, that number 2 that' s after it, 5983 to 5989. 3 Although that sounds like it might be a 4 service station, it's not. One service station 5 is permitted, or we' re requesting to have one 6 service station permitted. And service 7 stations are permitted right now. 8 MR. GRIMES: Is that with fuel? 9 MR. MULHERE: Yes . Gas station. 10 MR. GRIMES: It's a direct opposite of 11 what this says (inaudible) . 12 MR. MULHERE: No, it' s not the opposite, 13 because the prohibited use is not -- where it 14 says fuel dealer, that' s not a gas station. 15 That is an industrial -- 16 MR. GRIMES: Jowl? 17 MR. MULHERE: Pardon? 18 MR. GRIMES: Jowl (phonetic) . 19 MR. MULHERE: See, it's like a big -- like 20 Evans Oil . 21 MR. GRIMES: All right, I understand. 22 MR. MULHERE: So that's what that refers 23 to. But one gas station. 24 MR. GRIMES: I have another question. 25 MR. MULHERE: Yes. 28 1 MR. GRIMES: when I read through this , 2 somehow it was just kind of like listening to 3 the news when we hear somebody speaking in the 4 Congress . And what all does mixed use -- could 5 the whole thing be commercial? 6 MR. MULHERE: That's a good question. 7 Yeah, it could. The flexibility, the way 8 we wrote it, we put the maximum flexibility, is 9 it could either be all residential , all 10 commercial or a mixture of both. 11 A few years ago East Naples Civic 12 Association was looking at the corridor and 13 doing some design work and they had a plan 14 developed, never got adopted, didn't go 15 anywhere, just was done. 16 This particular piece, because of its -- 17 there's a lot of small -- there' s a lot of 18 10,000 square foot parcels and 20,000 square 19 foot C-3, C-4 parcels. This is 30 acres . And 20 it's not 30 acres of developable land, but it' s 21 still 20 or 22 acres of developable land. 22 That he's makes it unique. Plus it's at 23 the intersection here. 24 So the East Naples Civic Association 25 identified this, they called it Navaho Trail 29 1 mixed use node or commercial node. 2 Now, as I said, it doesn't have any weight 3 in the government. It was just them planning. 4 They were just looking to try to make things 5 better at East Naples. 6 A lot of new things have happened now. 7 Now with all the development that's occurring 8 you' re going to see a lot of interest in hiring 9 opportunities. That's whys we want the 10 flexibility. we don't really know right now 11 exactly which way the market' s going. one 12 thing we know, we know the Commissioner in the 13 district and other folks, there's a concern 14 that East Naples has enough affordable housing. 15 And we' re not asking for that. 16 we' re even willing to restrict our 17 residential use to a marked degree so we can 18 give people a sense of comfort that we' re not 19 asking for that. 20 MR. GRIMES: I think this is the third 21 meeting I went to on that property. Nothing 22 happens . That' s the way it's been. It was 23 commercial and then assisted living. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, it was assisted 25 living. That's how -- 30 1 (Inaudible. Two people speaking at once.) 2 MR. GRIMES: -- because I had to cut my 3 melaleuca trees and they didn't. You know what 4 I mean? 5 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, yeah. 6 MR. GRIMES: But I just was concerned 7 about whether it could be full commercial or 8 not on that -- 9 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, there's a lot of the 10 exotics on that piece there. That will be 11 cleaned up. 12 MR. GRIMES: I know, but that was just a 13 joke. 14 MR. MULHERE: Were you developing the 15 property? 16 MR. GRIMES: Pardon? 17 MR. MULHERE: Were you developing it? 18 MR. GRIMES: No, I owned property. 19 MR. MULHERE: And they made you go and 20 clear the exotics? 21 MR. GRIMES: They wouldn't let me cut down 22 all those trees. I had to cut down only the 23 exotics . 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes . By hand. 25 MR. GRIMES: And every time a limb fell on 31 1 the ground I had a code enforcement violation. 2 And it went on for a long time. 3 MR. MULHERE: It isn't easy. 4 MR. GRIMES: No, no, it's not. 5 MR. MULHERE: Yes? 6 MS. KELLY: If you develop this as 7 residential , would say you describe what you 8 would put in there? 9 MR. MULHERE: It would be multi-family, 10 marketing multi-family or townhomes. Maybe 11 townhomes . Depends on, you know, what the -- 12 MS. KELLY: How many stories high? 13 MR. MULHERE: Right now I think we can go 14 50 feet. 15 MS. KELLY: And if it' s assisted living? 16 MR. MULHERE: Assisted living is a little 17 bit higher. 18 MR. SHUCART: i think they' re all the 19 same. 20 MS. KELLY: What about hotel? 21 MR. MULHERE: You know what, I don 't -- 22 how many units? 23 MS. KELLY: No, how high. 24 MR. MULHERE: How high. Let me look, 25 because I don't want to answer something that 32 1 isn't accurate. Just give me a second, I have 2 that document here. I have it here. 3 Okay, building height. Here we are. It' s 4 50 feet. 5 MS. KELLY: Fifty feet. So it' s all about 6 the same. 7 MR. MULHERE: Yeah. I just wanted to make 8 sure I didn't misspeak. 9 MS. KELLY: And where would that -- 10 MR. MULHERE: Well , they' re not going to 11 want to be invisible, so -- 12 MS. KELLY: That would probably face 41. 13 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, if a hotel went there, 14 they would want exposure. And, you know, 15 that' s kind of why I said we knew that if there 16 was going to be any concerns it would come from 17 folks living close by. That's why the design 18 was to create a good separation. 19 MS. KELLY: Well , we can swim over and 20 meet you every now and then. 21 MR. MULHERE: But you'll have a landscape 22 buffer here too, and we'll make sure it' s 23 substantial . 24 MS. KELLY: I'll be over there watching. 25 MR. MULHERE: That's good. You keep us 33 1 honest. 2 You had a question? 3 MR. WEST: Cary West. 4 You say that you'd be willing to restrict 5 affordable housing. At what point in this 6 process will that come into play where that 7 actually goes on paper? 8 MR. MULHERE: Good question. 9 MR. WEST: Are we someplace where we need 10 to voice our concerns that we don't want to see 11 more of that, or is this way ahead of the game? 12 MR. MULHERE: No, you' re not ahead of it. 13 This hearing that's coming up is when we intent 14 to introduce that. So that's the 21st of 15 August. We' re going to put the language in the 16 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 17 MS. KELLY: Is that an open meeting? 18 MR. MULHERE: Yes. And you should -- if 19 you' re within 500 feet, you' ll all get noticed. 20 And you'll see some signs on the property and 21 there'll be an ad in the paper. 22 MR. ZENZ: That's it, 500 feet? That's 23 all you' re -- 24 MR. MULHERE: 500 feet of the boundary. 25 So anybody that's within 500 feet of this -- 34 1 it' s larger in the rural area, it' s 1,000 feet 2 in the rural area because, you know, lower 3 density involved. Well , that' s why they do 4 signs and the newspaper ad too. 5 Yes, sir? 6 MR. HENDERS: Jerry Henders , Trail Acres . 7 would our access (phonetic) be the preserve 8 and/or lake or would it be restricted to people 9 in the development? 10 MR. MULHERE: That' s going to be a 11 stormwater lake so, I mean, I wouldn't eat 12 anything caught in it. You can catch it and 13 throw it back. 14 And as far as the preserve goes , if it' s 15 developed as residential , perhaps a developer 16 would want to try to use some of it as an 17 amenity and they would put in some boardwalks . 18 But most of the time with something of that 19 size, that's not the case and it' s just 20 separate. They put some signs up, this is a 21 preserve. Because the agencies are very 22 particular and sensitive about having it get 23 degraded by people using it. 24 A larger preserve, somebody would spend 25 the money to do it because they consider it to 35 1 be an amenity itself, the project. So I'm not 2 saying somebody couldn't do a multi-family 3 project and put a little thing down to the 4 lake. i mean, that could happen. That could 5 happen. 6 Yes. 7 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Chris is 8 the owner of the property or is he the -- 9 MR. MULHERE: Chris is the owner. 10 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, I'm one of the owners . 11 MR. WESTGATE: Are you willing -- are you 12 partnering with a developer? Have you thought 13 about developing it yourself, or what are your 14 visions -- what are your visions for the 15 property? 16 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, our visions are as of 17 right now we don't have a lot of concrete 18 definitive plans. we want to first get through 19 the entitlement process and understand what we 20 have as far as a way of development. we are 21 looking at some joint venture commercial 22 developments. we' re looking at a number of 23 different multi-family developments . we may 24 end up selling the site. So there's a 25 possibility of that as well too. So at this 36 1 point I can't really give you a great answer. 2 We' re looking at a lot of different avenues . 3 MR. WESTGATE: Are you a current developer 4 in the East Naples area? 5 MR. SHUCART: Yeah, we actually own the 6 shopping center right next door to the 7 property. 8 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: 9 MR. WESTGATE: So you have a vested 10 interest in East Naples . 11 MR. SHUCART: We have a vested interest 12 not only in East Naples but in this particular 13 corridor. The better this particular property 14 is developed, the better it's going to enhance 15 our property next door as well . 16 we also have an interest in Port of the 17 Islands Marina, which I still consider East 18 Naples, but -- so the better East Naples is , 19 the better even Port of the Islands will be 20 affected by it. 21 MR. WESTGATE: So you can understand the 22 concerns of the -- I don't know where you live, 23 but you can understand or share the same 24 concerns as possibly the people that live 25 within this immediate area of the -- whatever 37 1 is going to be developed on the piece of 2 property. And the limits to traffic, the type 3 of housing or type of commercial . 4 And had you ever envisioned building or 5 selling it to a developer that would build a 6 multi-family, low-income housing facility or 7 deal with somebody such as Habitat and develop 8 it -- have Habitat develop it into what they -- 9 MR. SHUCART: Absolutely not. I don't 10 think that' s really the -- I don't think that' s 11 the highest and best use for this particular 12 site. As Bob had mentioned, we' re going to 13 write into the documents that there is market 14 rate housing not to allow an affordable housing 15 component. we don't want to see it, we don't 16 think that that's really the best use for this 17 site. There' s better opportunities for it than 18 to have that. 19 MR. WESTGATE: It may be the most 20 profitable for the investor. 21 MR. SHUCART: It's not going to be. 22 Affordable housing doesn't always mean 23 profitable. And with the market the way it is 24 right now, I think there's more profitable ways 25 to go other than affordable housing. 38 1 MR. MULHERE: And there's ample -- I mean, 2 you've heard the argument made, but -- and 3 there hasn't been a recent study done. I don't 4 know when the last time there was a study done 5 related to the amount of affordable housing. A 6 few years ago there was one, and it was pretty 7 substantial amount of available affordable 8 housing, in particular in East Naples . 9 So, you know, I don't -- it' s tough to get 10 through the process in Collier County. Just in 11 case anybody doesn't know, there's five 12 Commissioners, and in Collier County to get a 13 Comprehensive Plan Amendment approved for a 14 rezone, you need four. 15 MR. WESTGATE: Once it's approved a 16 rezone -- 17 MR. MULHERE: It's called a supermajority. 18 MR. WESTGATE: But once it's approved and 19 rezoned, part of that rezoning would allow for, 20 you know 360-- 21 MR. MULHERE: Well , that's why we' re 22 putting language in. 23 MR. SHUCART: That's why we' re going to 24 write the language in market rate. 25 MR. WESTGATE: Yeah, I'm not real 39 1 comfortable with that. I'd have to -- 2 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, but that' s -- 3 MR. WESTGATE: what' s market rate? I 4 mean, the market is -- I mean, an affordable 5 home sells for $140,000. Is that market rate? 6 MR. MULHERE: We can define -- it is 7 defined what's affordable. It' s defined by the 8 amount of your income, you know, that you have 9 to -- that you can afford to spend on housing. 10 And I don't have the exact formula. 11 MR. SHUCART: You get government subsidies 12 with the affordable housing. I mean, that' s 13 part of why people do affordable housing, 14 because of the tax incentives associated with 15 it. And that' s the element that brings in the 16 ability to offer low rent, because you get 17 government subsidy on a tax basis . 18 MR. MULHERE: I mean, we understand that 19 concern, and we want to -- 20 MR. WESTGATE: I mean, it' s a pretty 21 busy -- it's a pretty busy intersection 22 already. So to add, you know, the density such 23 as that many units, I just don't see that it 24 could handle that much. 25 MR. MULHERE: We've been through the 40 1 traffic analysis and we' re okay with the cap 2 that they put it. It may be fewer units and 3 more commercial , it may be all commercial . But 4 there's a cap and it's the number of trips . 5 And they've done the analysis , the county' s 6 done the analysis. That' s how they arrived at 7 it, that this is what the capacity is, you can 8 only have this number of trips. 9 MR. SHUCART: And also, if there's 10 additional improvements needed at that 11 intersection, there's certain triggers that 12 require improvements to that intersection 13 there. The signal 's already there, which has 14 made a big difference. And so if an extra turn 15 lane needs to be added, that has to be our 16 cost. If an extra inbound lane needs to be 17 added, that would be at our cost. And it would 18 have to -- you know, there's additional studies 19 that would have to be done in order to 20 determine if the intersection's going to 21 function properly. 22 MR. MULHERE: which you do at -- 23 MR. WESTGATE: I hope you share the same 24 value of the homeowners in the area of not 25 putting another whistler's Cove on the corner 41 1 of Southwest Boulevard. 2 MR. SHUCART: 1 100 percent appreciate 3 that. And the local commissioner is adamantly 4 opposed to anything like that. 5 So if you have some other suggestions , 6 I'll defer to Bob and our attorney as far as 7 coming up with some better language to further 8 solidify that concept. I'm open to 9 suggestions. 10 MR. WESTGATE: When Donna Fiala comes back 11 in September from her vacation, we have a 12 meeting set up with some of the other neighbors 13 and myself about how that' s going to be and 14 what's going on with that. 15 MR. MULHERE: That's good. Great. 16 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Because she 17 said that stuff to us before when we had -- 18 (Inaudible. Telephone interruption.) They say 19 things and they go along with the developers . 20 MR. SHUCART: we' re open to figuring out a 21 way to bridge that gap as far as writing it in. 22 I'm not sure there's been other developers 23 that's actually written it in before but -- 24 MR. MULHERE: No, that' s never happened. 25 MR. SHUCART: -- but Bob can speak to 42 1 that. 2 MR. WESTGATE: Because we fought against 3 having Habitat buying out properties and 4 developing a Habitat. 5 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about in the 6 Manor? 7 MR. SHUCART: No, they were purchasing 8 some trailers. 9 MR. WESTGATE: Some? No, a lot. In Trail 10 Acres . They destroyed First and Second Street. 11 MR. MULHERE: I didn't know that. 12 MR. WESTGATE: There's just no stopping 13 them. You know what I mean? 14 MR. MULHERE: There isn't. Because in 15 that situation there's no legal way. They have 16 the right to go buy them. I think we have to 17 have do this now at the zoning stage. And we 18 may need some -- we may need some guidance in 19 terms of the language. But we' re committing to 20 you that we' re going to put that in there and 21 we' ll figure out the right way to get it in 22 there. 23 MR. SHUCART: Because we believe in the 24 same concept. I mean, that's not what's going 25 to benefit the area and it's not going to 43 1 benefit the property next door and it's really 2 not what' s needed in the area. we've got -- 3 you know, East Naples finally has some great 4 momentum going again. And it's nice to see the 5 things that are going on in the neighborhood. 6 The Fresh Market and the outbacks and all of 7 those things coming about. 8 MR. WESTGATE: There' s other, you know, 9 property. The gated communities are kind of 10 protected within their gated community as far 11 as home value. But if you' re not living in a 12 gated community, you really don't have 13 protection -- 14 MR. MULHERE: You don't, but -- 15 MR. WESTGATE: -- as far as value. So -- 16 MR. MULHERE: A rise in tide, you know, 17 floats all boats . what happens is that over 18 time the market values will increase as East 19 Naples matures and you get a lot of this really 20 nice housing selling. And even then the 21 non-gated communities, you' re going to see 22 market values go up. And there's no better 23 way -- 24 MR. WESTGATE: But they always find a way. 25 They always find a way. 44 1 MR. MULHERE: Well , right now they can do 2 it because if you go in and ask for an 3 affordable housing density bonus, the land 4 costs have gotten so high that they only way 5 you can do that, you can afford to do that, is 6 if you' re subsidized. If he had: Man. I 7 didn't know anything about that, which is very 8 hard tort as well . 9 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Across the 10 road there -- 11 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry, I didn 't 12 hear what you said. 13 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: But we 14 don't want anything more like that. 15 MR. MULHERE: I understand that. 16 MR. WESTGATE: Yeah, that was actually -- 17 that was not supposed to happen. And it did. 18 MR. ZENZ: Because Fiala pushed it. She 19 pushed it. That was when they wanted 20 affordable housing. That's been going on for 21 years . That's what I'm saying, you said she 22 says no. She does. 23 MR. MULHERE: She does to us when we go 24 see her. She's pretty clear. Maybe she 25 changed her mind. 45 1 MR. ZENZ: You have Habitat. venetian 2 Falls , which is right next to the Hitching 3 Post. 4 MR. SHUCART: where is the Venetian Falls? 5 MR. ZENZ: Right next to Hitching Post on 6 41. 7 MR. MULHERE: I think it's down a ways. 8 MR. ZENZ: It's right next to the radio 9 station. Down a ways. I think it' s called 10 venetian. same thing. They put that through. 11 And then there again, they gave the bonus of 12 letting more people be on that -- those are the -- 13 smallest lots . whispering cove is the same 14 way, they stuck that in. 15 MR. MULHERE: Charlee Estates? It's a 16 Habitat project. 17 MR. ZENZ: Like I said, it's right where 18 you go past the Hitching Post on that big empty 19 lot that's for sale. 20 MS. KELLY: No, RaceTrac is coming there. 21 RaceTrac gasoline station. 22 MR. ZENZ: No, I know. once you go past 23 that, you' re going more south towards 951. 24 There's a whole big Habitat -- 25 MR. MULHERE: So, you know, again, we 46 1 understand that. we' re willing to put the 2 conditions in there to the best of our ability. 3 we' ll work with you and we'll keep you posted. 4 You can communicate with us as we move forward. 5 It's a public meeting on the 21st. You should 6 show up and express your concerns if you have 7 them, you know, with respect to that issue, you 8 know. 9 MR. WEST: Thanks, Chris, we'll be in 10 touch with that. 11 MR. MULHERE: I do want to see if there's 12 any other questions before we close. 13 MR. LOVETT: On 59, correctional 14 institutions , 9223. Does that keep somebody 15 from building a facility that helps felons get 16 back on their feet? 17 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Halfway 18 houses? 19 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about 20 something like St. Matthews House? 21 MR. LOVETT: Yes. 22 MR. MULHERE: Homeless shelters and soup 23 kitchens are prohibited. 24 MR. LOVETT: But that's -- it' s not one of 25 those main things that the idea is -- 47 1 MS. KELLY: This is prohibited. 2 MR. LOVETT: That's what I'm saying. Does 3 it prohibit? 4 MR. MULHERE: I would say it does . You' re 5 talking about a rehabilitation facility. 6 MR. LOVETT: That's not a place for 7 felons. 8 MR. MULHERE: You' re talking about 9 rehabilitation. 10 MR. LOVETT: Rehabilitation. 11 MR. MULHERE: I don't know if there's 12 anything that specifically works for felons. -- 13 But this -- 14 MR. LOVETT: It was just a question. 15 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, no problem. 16 Any other questions? 17 (No response.) 18 MR. MULHERE: Okay, I'm going to run out 19 to my car and get some cards . I'll bring them 20 back in so that if somebody has a question, 21 they can call me. Sorry, I should have brought 22 them in with me, but I -- 23 MS. WHITE: I have a question. 24 MR. MULHERE: Yes. 25 MS. WHITE: Is it legal for you to put in 48 1 there that you can't sell to -- 2 MR. MULHERE: Very good question. 3 MS. WHITE: And are you then by doing that 4 setting up one of those crazy lawsuits that -- 5 MR. MULHERE: No, your question is very, 6 very good. we don't know the answer to that. 7 I'll repeat the question for these guys. 8 Rich, we've got to get you in on this. 9 The question was, is it legal to put in some 10 language that would restrict the market that we 11 would sell this to. And I said I'm not sure 12 that we know the answer to that. It' s never 13 been done before. we think maybe we can do it. 14 Depending on the language we use we can do it. 15 But I'll defer because it isn't up to me. I 16 know I like to play an attorney, but I'm not 17 one, so -- 18 MR. YOVANOVICH: Our intent is to work 19 with the County Attorney and craft appropriate 20 language to assure that we deliver to you 21 everything we've committed to delivering to 22 you, which is it's going to be a mark rate -- I 23 would telling this gentleman, luxury. if it's 24 a rental community, it would be a luxury 25 rental . It would not be whistler's Cove. I 49 1 forget when that went through, but I think it 2 may have been before Donna became the 3 commissioner in that area. And I think it was 4 when John Norris was. I won't swear to it but 5 I think it was. 6 But you've got to remember, there were 7 different times back then regarding -- but 8 anyway, whistler's Cove was a project that 9 was -- did get federal subsidies to buy the 10 property. And in exchange for that they had to 11 agree to certain restrictions on affordability. 12 I believe it was a 30-year commitment, 13 whistler' s cove. I may be off a few years, but 14 I think it was a 30-year commitment. 15 so we -- our goal is to be direct and put 16 right in the Puy that we will do -- we are not 17 doing any affordable housing and we are doing a 18 luxury rental or multi-family type project. 19 whether the County Attorney is going to let me 20 get away with being that direct, I don't know, 21 we may have to massage it a little bit to make 22 sure that we' re okay legally, but we will get 23 there. 24 MR. ZENZ: But if you change the zoning 25 and then the developer decides I don't want the 50 1 property anymore, I'm going to sell it. so the 2 next person comes in and says oh, well the 3 zonings changed and I can put 360 rental 4 residents and it's already done and over with. 5 MR. YOVANOVICH: Couple things you have to 6 factor in and do your own homework. one, you 7 have to factor in land price, that goes in a 8 prorated cost. Then you have to build it, so 9 you have to figure your construction cost. By 10 the time you figure all that in, you have to 11 make a profit on the rents. At some point I 12 think the math is going to show you that it' s 13 not going to be an affordable housing project. 14 Because when you throw all of those costs in, 15 and you want to make a profit, you' re not going 16 to be able to rent it to people who qualify for 17 low-income housing. 18 MR. MULHERE: But I just want to also -- I 19 mean, if we put a condition in there, it runs 20 with the zoning. You can sell the land, but 21 you ' re still subject to the same conditions. 22 It does not go away if it's sold. It runs with 23 the land. That' s why we' re suggesting you put 24 it in zoning. Because you can't get around 25 that. You can change -- you can go in and 51 1 rezone it if you want, but then we'll have 2 another information meeting and then -- yes? 3 MR. SCHMIDT: If I can, Bob had mentioned 4 earlier as well that language about the kind of 5 housing they propose might even appear in the 6 comprehensive Plan itself. And that' s just 7 another level of protection you would have. 8 MR. MULHERE: True, it would be harder to 9 change that. very good point. 10 MR. SCHMIDT: We've got two layers of 11 protection that would end up controlling the 12 property. 13 MR. WEST: what about the difference 14 between -- you know, there' s a difference 15 between a rental development and a -- 16 MR. MULHERE: Fee simple owned. That you 17 cannot regulate. That is a form of ownership. 18 zoning has nothing to do it whether it' s a 19 rental apartment or a fee simple owned. The 20 way to get it is to make it market rate. 21 MS. WAGNER: Melody Wagner. 22 I guess I want clarification. The way 23 it' s zoned right now, you' re saying four units 24 per acre. 25 MR. MULHERE: Correct. 52 1 MS. WAGNER: I just did the math, and with 2 only 22 acres, that means 16 plus eight units 3 per acre now. 4 MR. MULHERE: It's actually based on the 5 total acreage. You go with the 30, not the 22 . 6 MS. WAGNER: Oh, I see. 7 MR. MULHERE: It's based on the total . 8 It's actually 12 . It's below 12 , it's 11. 7, I 9 think. 10 MS. WAGNER: And I guess -- you said 50 11 feet. How many stories is that 50? 12 MR. MULHERE: Four. Four. In today's -- 13 under today's high ceiling market. Four 14 stories, three or four. Some people don't 15 build four, they only build three. 16 MS. WAGNER: That's still a huge building. 17 MR. MULHERE: Well , the setback, there's 18 further setback. Besides the buffer, there's a 19 setback requirement too, and that's based -- 20 the setback is largely based on the height of 21 the building. 22 MR. YOVANOVICH: I think something you 23 really have to factor in. The existing zoning, 24 the front of it that fronts commercial , it's 25 already zoned commercial for that. And the 53 1 back is basically the residential type of use. 2 That zoning really hamstrings the ability to 3 develop a quality project on this property 4 because you' re going to have strip retail up 5 front because you've got a long narrow piece. 6 And you' re going to have a relatively low 7 density project that you can't amenitize. So 8 you' re not going to get the high-end 9 residential uses on that property on a small 10 little piece that you can't provide any 11 amenities to as far as zoning. 12 so what this is going to give the 13 developer is the flexibility to provide a 14 multi -family project that can have appropriate 15 amenities that will increase market values 16 around you, or provide appropriate commercial 17 that will increase the property values over 18 what currently can be built on the property. 19 It' s a tough piece of property to develop 20 with quality development. 21 MS. WAGNER: well , if you' re familiar with 22 Mercado -- 23 MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm very familiar. 24 MS. WAGNER: -- you've got mixed use. And 25 you've got mixed -- you've got commercial on 54 1 the first layer and then you've got one or two 2 layers of high-end residential . 3 MR. MULHERE: On some of the buildings . 4 MR. YOVANOVICH: And if you' re familiar 5 with the condo and you' re familiar with Bay 6 Front, Bay Front they can't keep quality 7 commercial in there. They -- I'm telling you, 8 I mean, I represent them, okay. So I know it' s 9 been a struggle to get that retail space 10 leased. They sold the units quick, but the 11 retail is -- 12 MR. MULHERE: It's taken Mercado a long 13 time too, but -- 14 MR. YOVANOVICH: The exact opposite 15 happened in Mercado. They filled up -- 16 MR. MULHERE: The commercial . 17 MR. YOVANOVICH: -- the commercial . But 18 the residential is tough to sale. I mean, 19 mixed use is really not making it in Naples. 20 MR. MULHERE: We do allow it. We allow 21 it. And so if we got the right mix of uses , 22 something like that could happen. 23 My guess is it would probably be more like r'1 24 commercial in a separate multi-family building. 25 Not necessarily in the same building, but same 55 1 campus. 2 MR. SHUCART: Similar to Naples square 3 downtown, they've got a 20-acre piece. 4 Three-quarters of it in the rear is going to be 5 residential and then the commercial will front 6 on 41. Now, it' s considered a quote, unquote 7 mixed use, but it's not the residential over 8 the commercial . 9 I think, you know, as Rich said, it' s not 10 really been a proven entity anywhere in town . 11 Even on Fifth Avenue it's struggled. You know, 12 to live above commercial is a younger type of 13 mentality. But you've got to have a certain 14 number of income to live in that area and it 15 just -- they' re almost polar opposites. 16 so I see it as more residential in the 17 rear and then more the commercial frontage type 18 in the front if it goes that direction. 19 MS. WAGNER: what is the acreage of the 20 commercial that' s available according to right 21 now? 22 MR. MULHERE: Right now? 23 MR. SHUCART: Just under 10 or right at 24 nine. 25 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, eight or nine acres . 56 1 MS. WAGNER: And this would increase that. 2 MR. MULHERE: This would allow you to do 3 all commercial , all residential or a mixture of 4 both. 5 MR. SHUCART: And right now there's 6 115,000 square feet of commercial on the nine 7 acres. So percentage-wise there' ll be -- if 8 the entire site is developed as commercial , it 9 would be -- 10 MR. MULHERE: Less intense. Because we' re 11 capped at 250. So right now it allows 115 on 12 nine acres. If we did it all commercial at 13 250, that would be on 22 acres. So it's a less 14 intensity. 15 MR. SHUCART: well , really it would be 30 16 acres. 17 MR. MULHERE: Yeah, hopefully. 18 Any -- it's 6: 30. I want to kind of wrap 19 it up, but I also want to make sure I answer 20 any of your questions. So any last questions? 21 (No response.) 22 MR. MULHERE: Really appreciate your 23 coming. I'm sure you've going to think of some 24 more questions. I'm going to run out to the 25 car and get my cards . If you want to call me, 57 1 you can. Some people don't like to ask 2 questions in a group. 3 (At which time, this meeting concluded at 4 6: 30 p.m.) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 — 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 58 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 4 state of Florida ) 5 County of Collier ) 6 7 I, CHERIE' NOTTINGHAM, Notary Public, in 8 and for the State of Florida at Large, certify that I 9 was authorized to and did stenographically report the 10 foregoing proceedings. 11 12 I further certify that I am not a relative, 13 employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties , 14 nor am I financially interested in the action. 15 16 Dated this 21st day of July, 2014. 17 18 eh pAibt-6-14,vyi 19 CHERIE' R. NOTTINGHAM Gregory Court Reporting 20 2650 Airport Road South *ot .;"% CHERIE R.NOTTINGHAM Naples, Florida 34112 21 * MY COMMISSION#FF 131691 My Commission No. FF 131691 na EXPIRES:July 12,2018 Expires : July 12 2018 22 Nl-freoFn.oes Bonded Thru Budget NotaryServices 23 24 25 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS ��. (Section 10.03.00,COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE(LDC) A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen(15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs,however these guidelines should not be construed to supercede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to Section 10.03.00 of the LDC. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public,not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s)in place,and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed,lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER GMPA-PL20130001767/CP-2013-:10 HOLE MONTES, INC. SI ATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP 950 ENCORE WAY, NAPLES, FL 34110 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY,STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 4th day of August , 20014,by ROBERT J. MULHERE , personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. � (wo tk-OV , Signs re of Notary Public _f ■• us MY COMM NISSIO #EE 163504 ki EXPIRES:March 9,2016 ; Stephanie Karol �,j Bonded Mrs Wary Public Underwriters Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) ( ) • 2 it /11:C a ......1 ‘.... = .....s., e s .... -wa- ...4 X'''' 4 a:= ....••an ar..K )L"'"" Z.4.;a-• .... a. CC rC Ca • -. DJ. ainr g,g 1Z sef •it :.-47.." , ....,., .....# frd LLI Ci i.1 2/11 ..._ '''''# .alc. r....r ...= 7;i..c = 711;AA S., "Le ...1 X•••• CI, Li- IL. w CD 0 ict .--6,., S ci .ic MaL 1.5 C7 '" .=, it ...a..r., dr Id- M -TE...! .,_ ,.. — ;.--,# .. ....,s.*- ..x. -4- ....1 =I ak., I CC tn — 1.41 = —, ki,- El- r..a.-t#E--- . , ...ec Z Z ?.....s .v- L.= = ICE es_ C,- - Ma MC ct, 44.17 u. 1 ....._ ....... .... sid E = ---,,a C5 ali .1. .... ,.. '.-. •X 1,... ,D M-C,'I;='''t allIC E ...,,r ,.st ILI--- —II OC — t.,_ cri --- r---....ma ....,•C• Ili Icilt _ "4Kasalg 01 = mins-LR t'r'-g — — .4.° • -az 1.- MEN _ air C:11 ;IF ■ • ii, u,-It 1.4.,..., /.... ox.ml +--'..1 Z . it..77. .. GO --* :3;N: ..c%"-- ' -,:i JC-'4C.7.- ..„9•2.-- AntrIcki._ Imam IMO •rr..= ..,.‘........ .r.....,. .. -• ..,., cm) Ci Au=M WM''• ,4.• s- it. ---_ a- m . CC ge EL C.11 Z .s;.., k 4,111,a1 st.0 --... M u....!...._fR •g .., „„s =A ava 1 21R 4 ..1L1 (7 awl ) ... i..d.,,I• (-) M .. ....1 r"*. CC "& = '‘. rm -a 10. X, iry C7 11-1 412 . .. Et ,4,Ta girli Pm". Ira ....i.v.....E ss ric.... t.i. — - L.1-11 1.1.1 W M = r- =1, 1,0., ...mal Fa:: •es.-,:...r,c. 'eC ..X , .1. ••••• Ilir 1... = j...-i.-. ,;E.:i..t'. t. C gl . bi. C cC,, Cf3 ir7 IF 'AY NT. '3,- tn E.! Or -.'s C'sa t-s4 M 1 i ' ='.2 1.1 ,a, .11 in —.3 '' *iir*17 .4. ict IS,d re ,-- toe ow ..-- 0 .E.:= , „ -,-- ;-4 --. T W. a:'t# ,• . _ . LL1 ...7: a all ... ,...1 -:„,,- 3"V iel 5 .1. 2"' 2 . . c 0 0 c –a 4 s ._ c) i....) ca) —'..2''''Sq.sto.-f• .._.4T w... IA, Li Li r 11441r Ct.12*Li #.E I-- LU Zta: 11- samomm r" " '-- amplIN i ■ R z:?,11..p rA .114 lt 2 imi I— — ,,--,,,._,,,, — , c....? 1- is ,i- 13..'-.... ..gt tr N Pc"'-"... Cl^ :- C...) 'IX • LL.1 -x=. -,.,.,— —e.....2g e, Ca-..=1.■a ..., 107 ... ••••■0 C..> c:i C3 •--I .27 1." ='' c' () m __a on . s.a it r- I.aaa 0 0 1, e• ti a.F i f � ;erg- f ..• iktft:if.1 ,t:' ..A„ .4 ' ' ',. i 1 t !' P b.,.,,$ -,r• �la 'Lf'� .:s mar f 4j... kf�a 44 c r y� 1 } § , ry• '1 r t „� '. 7 k - P. - �.' 4.fl `�` " �'f.SPr t: 't 7rf . „ y;. • \ 4 f.s •ry`l . S.r �,z., z,'" --.,.:a f t a 4-. •�-`.' ' rsJ_ fx ,y.' .14:4,11..;4. < .w'r `er'°«34" , ,"'r"'f . - 4i .a I iz vb i� k= f �� ' 5 �' u•x•. 8 ' att... �'x tka. 'a 'L: i4., ti a� I.Y S`%5 � a 3 4- .f-t s• #% i n ° z'R. '9r.,' • i,` , yy' L.Y :-; r' p�x1. 1:;: d•.S'F f} s''''.. .';',:.'' ^t �•{3 4• € .fe• 7''' * 47 '° Y ` r «a. My• sr •• if5,t4 3 ,.�. ..- . til4 # 7 ,f' 7. 1,,'-.--; . },4 r F vu t° s ! + '.t a Loy { .= s`'F 4 Z' -'' • 3 Xi ' � `� da. �' 4,_4..,-A._7;E ° � : s .., t o 1 " *" l'Y= >t . .. t 1 e 4 '- : • �4 ot. { b : '{ 1 e s ' tea. i a s'. ti" .• • +rc . , .. • • ... •,. . . !Al :1 '1'i:. , ' .•i 1;. ' ' L ' • . ,, , _r t. r • + s e.Z, fir' a r mss.{'`„ ;w9t v 7ig„,,, x" a' rte'+ " r b PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on Thursday,August 21, 2014 at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES,BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/ INTENSITY: UP TO 12 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 360 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF.60 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF.60. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-5 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 31 ±ACRES. [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] LELY, A R ORT COMMUNITY yi9� NAPLES MANOR DRI) i ?, rn O 29 28 27 m MICEU (S) 'G w MYRTLE p/ 0 WOODS WHISTLERS COVE TREE TOPS PROJECT LOCATION TRAIL ACRES 32 33 34 VINCENSAN (S) WENTWORTH ESTATES VICTORIA FALLS All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the Planning &Zoning Department, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite#401 Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning &Zoning Department. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday,August 21,2014,will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceed- ing,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please con- tact the Collier County Facilities Management Department,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite #101, Naples, FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted lis- tening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission Collier County, FL No.231130915 August 1,2014 AGENDA ITEM 9-B Col ler County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING SERVICES—PLANNING&ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION--PLANNING&REGULATION HEARING DATE: AUGUST 21, 2014 SUBJECT: PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD, AKA ESPLANADE GOLF &COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTY OWNER& APPLICANT/CONTRACT PURCHASER/AGENT: Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Agents: Taylor Morrison Esplanade Alexis Crespo,AICP Richard Yovanovich,Esquire Naples LLC Waldrop Engineering Coleman,Yovanovich Koester 4900 N. Scottsdale Rd. 28100 Bonita Grande Dr Ste 305 4011 Tamiami Trail N Ste 300 Scottsdale,AZ 85251 Bonita Springs,FL 34135 Naples, FL 34103 Owners: Taylor Morrison Esplanade Peter Di Lillo Trustee Naples LLC Peter Di Lillo Trust UDT 7-6-90 4900 N. Scottsdale Rd. 128 N 24th Ave Scottsdale,AZ 85251 Melrose Park,IL 60160-3032 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for an amendment to the existing PUD zoned project known as Mirasol Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD),to approve several changes to the project. For details about the project proposal, refer to"Purpose/Description of Project." GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, with the additional land proposed, consisting of 1,658.3± acres, is located on the north side of Immokalee Road (CR 846) bordered on the east by the proposed extension of Broken Back Road and future Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Sections 10, 15 and 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida (See location map on the following page). PUDZ-A-PL20140000098: MIRASOL RPUD Page 1 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 lit. . Au----- ii ii i _t, . I. I i 1 zilp r . ii,_....„..t.. o : II pe t _ . Gal__ eu�uii o ', 1 .1111 _ �I � J 1 j � 111N111111 �� Lt__ _i.i-fie—fig,Ittrin-M7:. - °I • ill Q .. ................ ....... .................„. ..... . ,........................ .. •• ...................... .. . ..... .................... . .. ..... ... "."......••••••••.....••. .....•... •..:•:.:.,......„.......... ...........:..... ....,....:.:. .,•. ,:::.:„.„..::::,:::„.•..„„...:::.,....,:::::::::::::::••.:•. :::,:,:,,,,,,,,....,,,,..:::•....„,• :„.„:„..:.p., ::::::::•••::,.,•::: oftwir% ......................—„,:::::,:::::,,,,, .IBilii illiiIIIiiiiiiililD 11::::IIII:111 Iv,,Iii1:1:1:::1:. .0, II-&iiiiiii.::::::::::::::i::12::::::::::::!::11!:.:1:1 :::::::::::,,,::,1,:,:!: :::!::::::,:,::.:.:,::: :::::::i vi::,::::::::/ ..: ,othii"ri....,„.,,,,,, iii.R.: _(!i* (r) '4444‘."' d3,'C ,. , r ,HIli".... J�r �(. rr, � r Z Ei ♦ z -� � � lu1 lil II�II���f;: 1 ��.� 11 1= 111111 11� r F,,, 0 s _ N •......,.....•...„:„....•.•.•..:......•.:„.•„.•••:.: •.:.•.•.,..... ..... il .2:.iifiai.ILiiia. ..,,,,,---------1 , 1 ••,,,,,,,____i •-.. .--° 1 - 1 1 ,..,,,, Ataritir, lit ,„-ro cn '.11111re 1 1,1111 II--�e�l�' i//I/ .1►1..1f 0) - 4 !il► 111 II�1•�i ,m �. I` 1 I• O. • �Vt �V N %1'�1llUVfriaA�� ����r^�� / 1 I w►_ �+..IN11 f j� � �...�_ .�,� . l1_'l ;� ±iii •�%� 1 _I a 1 MS U1 10N a 8 s Z AiNIIOO 331 R z R1 s$ w ._o $ $ a a ,,_ a # w 1t 26 11 8'� p a 5 i I Iii i i k--- 11�` g "aI a. Y _P 1 6 8 a0 sc VO ochmirloo wwnoa 2 111rdJ 73111 e A H �111 '- z g 3103... ] r---) , i5 i g°a L ff 0 G ¢ J z is S ti 4%1 �a g- w de (.L1 ,I t BL'31V/SWINI —I N0.l�H0YM SEE SHEET # 2 FOR CONTINUATION ., NOTE: ,ii § FOR PLAN LEGEND AND R/G SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 R/G N R/G \{ ' i 111111111N1011 TERAFtNA ( RIG (POD) R/G q ss RIO ;f —SFWMD A+, PRESERVE CONCEPTUAL ``, CLUB HOUSE 4 COMPLEX LOW° R/G ;, `i HERITAGE , BAY R/G \ R/G ;i , , 1PUD) � . . . . . • AIL. _••o �` �, ENTRY 1 / sIGNAGE <„ 0 . . . . . . •••••••••••• . 4i ---M3,i, " _ • • • . . . . . . $ S I. \I, i--PRIVATE SPINE R/G A y ROAD II' 20'TYPE'D'L.B•E. . . 11 R/G , t00'PROPOSED C.R.951 EXT. j . R.O.W.DEDICATION o OC) 15'TYPE MAINTENANCE FACILITY• 'B'L•B.E• IA) TREE FARM o INGLE-FAMILY /PUP) c PRIVATE SPINE 171 m ROAD PROPERTY• �, [BOUNDARY • .• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • Si / ns • E. OLDS S4 35 t CYPRESS ® ® RIG (P°D' ® w . R/G ' WALDROP •N t ,a ENGINEERING R/G CML NEre 11 LAND 4 PROPERTY Y DCURL ENGFAEERING 11L1NtN BOUNDARY ® ®: 2BIOOBOM1AI711AVOEOIYVE-BUlleSOS m uo r SPRINGS,FL 641 311 0 g ill ®� r__/....,/ W PE1iN3:ktoOwWaroWFWWnea 4-0.1 ®®�®' � OY F10¢I�A CER"fifiCATl:I)PM1i110w1T+ATnN1 i861A 4 -PO uRBLE m ESPLANADE GOLF ® ®mid' R/G i INTERCONNECT AND COUNTRY•®1®11`�e FUTURE CLUB OF NAPLES• ,� «:► ACTIVITY CENTER & CENTER RPUD 2 ME: CONCEPTUAL uI0 mH i�_� �' MASTER PLAN � �1 - --•'=i'.�1 1 -_._-r—ru �'��r*w�I EXHIBIT"C2" IMMOKALEE ROAD(C.R.846) 2 20'TYPE R 'D'LB.E. ENTRY 27 28 SHEET 1 OF 3 SIGNAGE .nr th N [(VP.) FILE NAME:27600E0602.dwg UPDATED:2014-03.06 0 a W Q AA N N 1 t0 a 9 LEE COUNTY to it 8 .'COLLTER.COUNTY' VACANT ••• OUT PARCEL OWNER: •.' FLA MAX LLC PROPERTY• PARKLANDS BOUNDARY• (PUD) v (A) VACANT 8 v v 0 C' (A) VACANT v ticT� . •L. 4k1 : R r Q TERAflNA ( - • - • • • • " • " ' * " • • • • - • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • . • - • IAI n19) .• •, � � WALDROP La N :. ;: ENGINEERING �o 1 . . DOLL ENSU�Exwa*LAND !... _ `•`• -`•'• • • . '. !.` DEVELOPMENT G0.NSULTANTS MOO DONITA GRANDE URNVT•MOE NM SEE SHEET # t FOR U INUATI0II UGMrT6.77T7 MOMS, - U O P:2R NOM7777 F:2119-4064880 M EMAIL in(aEAMdrcp eerk4wm NOTES FIDRNACDk7 NCA77{OP AURIOMIZA'DONf8W6 FOR PLAN LEGEND AND SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET s OF 3 ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES J_ RPUD Q Si CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN g EXHIBIT"C2" M CO 1L1 N SHEET 2 OF 3 FILE NAME:27600E0602,dwg ts n UPDATED:2014.03-O6 • I. CONCEPTUAL LAKE LOCATIONS * R/G RESIDENTIAL / GOLF [J -�• PRESERVE RIGHT-OF-WAY * LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO RELOCATION/IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. SPECIAL NOTES: N 1) WHERE APPLICABLE ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS. $ IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TO MEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANT % MATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED. s a NATIVE HABITAT SUM MARY: EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT =903.8 Ac. ± ' REQUIRED NATIVE HABITAT = 542.3 Ac. ± PROVIDED NATIVE HABITAT (ON SITE) = 542.3 Aa. ± �� 8 c ACREAGE SUMMARY: I AI a. SECTION 22 = 445.5 Ac. i- t : SECTION 15 = 634.6 Ao. ± g SECTION 10 = 578.2 Aa. ± TOTAL = 1,658.3 Ac. ± S 0 O TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 928.8 Ac. -} WALDROP 113 TOTAL AREA WITHIN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY = 729.5 Ac. ± 1n ENGINEERING N 1p MAL ENGINEERING G LAND DEVELOPMENT CO SIJTANTA O 46100 G06f7A GRANDE DRIVE..SUNS 306 U DUNIIA SMIRK 1L 34135 R 738405.7177 f:439-4004860▪ •p (MAIL•I51e28.Idro544/58erI (nl 5 R'ARTJA CIiRT1i1CAiA OP♦VTH>R12.T10N Adtilti ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY s CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD 73 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN Q .. EXHIBIT 11C211 - W SHEET 3 OF 3 r o FILE NAME:27600E0602.dwg N I UPDATED:2014.03.06 C'1 - PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for an amendment to the Mirasol RPUD, governed by Ordinance Number 2009-21, to allow the following changes: • Rezone the Property from RPUD and Rural Agricultural to a unified RPUD; • Add 19.7+/-acres into the project boundary; • Increase the unit count from 1,121 units to 1,233 units(an increase of 112 units); • Change the PUD name from"Mirasol RPUD"to"Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD"; • Revise Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, to add reference to the increased unit count and Hearing Examiner process; • Revise Exhibit B, Development Standards Table, and correct scrivener's errors in the footnotes; • Revise Exhibit C,PUD Master Plan; • Revise Exhibit D,Legal Description;and • Revise Exhibit F,PUD Commitments. According to the Petitioner's Agent's description, the following constitutes the project's history: The Property was originally rezoned in 2001 from Rural Agricultural with ST Overlay to a Planned Unit Development per Ordinance 2001-20. In 2009, the Property was rezoned to RPUD to allow for 799 dwelling units, 36 golf course holes, 780+/- acres of on-site preserve, and additional off-site preserve, thus repealing Ordinance 2001-20. In 2012, the RPUD was amended to add 95+/-acres of land, reduce the development footprint, and increase on-site preserve areas. The amendment was unanimously approved pursuant to Ordinance 12-41. Since this approval site development has commenced, including the installation of roadways, utilities, lakes, golf course, and the temporary pro shop. Model homes have also been constructed and the community is open for sales of single-family homes. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:, North: City of Bonita Springs in Lee County, developed with the Village Walk single-family residential development,with a zoning designation of Mixed Use Planned Development East: The partially developed Heritage Bay DRI/PUD, a mixed use 2,562± acre mixed use project, approved for a density of 1.3 units per acre in Ordinance #2003-40, a 20 acre undeveloped tract with an Agricultural zoning designation, and two undeveloped Commercial Planned Unit Development zoned projects,Tree Farm PUD and Addie's Corner PUD PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 2 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 South:: Agriculturally zoned tracts ranging in size from 0.5 to 2.5 acres with frontage along Immokalee Road,Nursery Lane, Woodland Avenue, and Rose Boulevard. There is also one small C-3 zoned undeveloped tract, then Immokalee Road (CR 846). On the south side of that road are the developed Laurelwood PUD, a 78-acre, residential PUD zoned project known as Ibis Cove, developed at a density of 5.96 units per acre in Ordinance#94-63; and the Richland PUD, a mixed used PUD developed as Pebblebrooke Lakes, which includes commercial and residential components,the residential density was approved at 3.1 units per acre. West: Terafina and the Parklands PUD zoned projects. Terafina (approved at a density of 1.3 units per acre) is partially developed as Riverstone; Parklands (approved at a density of 2.5 units per acre) remains undeveloped. Additionally there are smaller agriculturally zoned tracts that are used for agricultural and residential purposes; then Olde Cypress (approved at a density of 2.1 units per acre),a developed residential project with a zoning designation of PUD `A IKL NE,S olk ASO. ;ni;l7 r I HE ITA::E I IE4AF1';A 14I2A:,31.. :I41, I L. _ E's1ATEs r+ _ I I:L IE i.Y•'4ESS • Ho4E 1 'j'� vl{AJL E • !"--- j _ a HE,ITAt:E CLUE CY,HESti . (:41' (141: I I SCtaes r R' „, � cF��+Ert I 11 1 .. i ,API r S-Iy1'I'nrMI kL Itl`s: 1 --._. - .2 HE4T I W d lI�HLAI,) ,-- CI4 I I �� RESEW:E �!! u Tus::avy 1 i � 1 Excerpt from the PUD map(6/2014) PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 3 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 r r r 2- " 'a y,i� l p ir 1 1`,. .• � t FrJi 1 ;. y: i � ' i�,fi .a H a i d a . t a '< Y Y _ l,,,i ,4 t`,;,‘:.(*., as x 4 r . - "Erg', j t'• r 0 , y �-.� • � i t a . g ' t '";,-'4'1 Yi r .y tS" ma } y'. w a ` s i; . l. ,,,,.;ty - ` -• ;; l , „. . ., :r X' ak a *1 L. l r,7 '�F►Y :.M-,27..i...- .,.r' it spy' r .. r . . '.4 .42.t? :._2. t. _ aa.. i%.L>C '+,S+,Sn. ►!s'+•,..+;,::.ri N. "+ .gin" x iptit Subject property depiction is approximate GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP)CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): A portion of the total subject property (445.5 acres in Section 22, inclusive of the 19.7-acre addition) is designated Urban (Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict),the remainder of the property (1,212.8 acres in Sections 10& 15) is designated Agricultural/Rural (Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands), as identified on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM)of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Relevant to this petition, the Urban Residential Subdistrict allows residential development at a base density of four(4)dwelling units per acre, subject to the Density Rating System provisions (this portion of the PUD is eligible for certain density bonuses but none are sought or needed to achieve the requested density); recreation and open space; and earth mining and related processing uses. The proposed amendment would increase the amount of the PUD designated Urban Residential from 425.8 acres to 445.5 acres,thus increasing the maximum allowed density on the portion of the PUD located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict(Section 22): Eligible density for property within Section 22 of approved PUD: 425.8 acres x 4 DU/A= 1,703 units Eligible density for property within Section 22 of proposed PUD amendment: PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 4 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17114 425.8 acres+ 19.7 acres=445.5 acres x 4 DU/A= 1,782 units The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands allows for a base density of one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) acres; golf courses subject to specific standards; and, earth mining and related processing. The existing portion in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is eligible for a maximum of 242 units: Eligible density for property within Section 10 and 15 of approved PUD: 1,212.8 acres x 0.2 DU/A(1 DU/5 acs.)=242 units With the requested land addition, the entire PUD - Urban Residential and RFMUD Neutral Lands combined - is eligible for up to 2,024 DUs. The existing PUD permits 1,121 DUs. The proposed PUD amendment would permit 1,233 residential DUs to be developed in Sections 15 and 22. If density blending is not utilized, then the maximum number of dwelling units allowed in Section 22, located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict, and in Sections 10 and 15, located within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, are to be developed within their respective District/Subdistrict. Specific to the Mirasol PUD, Section 5.1(g) of the Density Rating System allows for density blending between the portions of the PUD that straddles between, and only within, Sections 15 and 22. The proposed PUD amendment seeks to utilize the Density Blending provision of the Density Rating System of the FLUE which reads as follows (each provision is followed by staffs analysis in bold): 5. Density Blending: This provision is intended to encourage unified plans of development and to preserve wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other natural features that exist within properties that straddle the Urban Mixed Use and Rural Fringe Mixed Use Districts or that straddle Receiving and Neutral Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. In the case of such properties, which were in existence and under unified control(owned,or under contract to purchase,by the applicant(s))as of June 19, 2002, the allowable gross density for such properties in aggregate may be distributed throughout the project, regardless of whether or not the density allowable for a portion of the project exceeds that which is otherwise permitted,when the following conditions are met: 1. Density Blending Conditions and Limitations for Properties Straddling the Urban Residential Sub-District or Urban Residential Fringe Sub-District and either the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral or Receiving Lands: (a) The project must straddle the Urban Residential Sub-District or Urban Residential Fringe Sub-District and either the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral or Receiving Lands; (Condition met. The total project area straddles between the Urban Residential Sub District and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands.) PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 5 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7117/14 (b) The project in aggregate is a minimum of 80 acres in size; (Condition met. Condition 5.1(g) specifically provides for Section 15 only to utilize Density Blending. The project lands in Section 15 and 22 total 1080.1 acres.) (c) At least 25% of the project is located within the Urban Mixed Use District (Condition met. Condition 5.1(g) specifically provides for Section 15 only to utilize Density Blending. Therefore, the cited minimum applies to the aggregate lands of the Mirasol PUD located in Sections 15 and 22 only. The project acreage in the Urban Mixed Use District is 445.5 acres, which is 41.2 percent of the acreage in those two Sections). The entire project is located within the Collier County Sewer and Water District Boundaries and will utilize central water and sewer to serve the project unless interim provisions for sewer and water are authorized by Collier County; (Condition met. Sections 15 and 22 are eligible for Density Blending and are within the Collier County Water and Sewer District boundaries and subject to the "Availability Letter" issued by the Public Utilities Division at the time of SDP.) (d) The project is currently zoned or will be rezoned to a PUD; (Condition met. The subject petition is for the Mirasol/Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples PUD.) (e) Density to be shifted to the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District from the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to be located on impacted lands, or it is demonstrated that the development on the site is to be located so as to preserve and protect the highest quality native vegetation and/or habitat on-site and to maximize the connectivity of such native vegetation and/or habitat with adjacent preservation and/or habitat areas; (Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to the Environmental staff) (f) The entire project shall meet the applicable preservation standards of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. (These preservation requirements shall be calculated upon and apply to the total project area. Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to the Environmental staff.) (g) Section 15 (Township 48 South, Range 26 East), which straddles the boundary of the Urban Residential Subdistrict and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, is designated Neutral, and is in the approved Mirasol PUD, may utilize this density blending provision, subject to the above criteria. (The existing Mirasol PUD Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit "C2" — and the proposed Master Plan for Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples-depicts development only in Sections 22 and 15, and thus density blending would be utilized for properties located in Section 15.) FLUE Objective 7 and relevant policies are stated below; each policy is followed by staff analysis in bold italics type. PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 6 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. (The Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples PUD Conceptual Master Plan depicts direct access to Immokalee Road(CR. 846), an arterial road as identified in the Transportation Element.) Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. (The Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples PUD Conceptual Master Plan depicts internal access or loop roads,) Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. (As shown on the Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples PUD Conceptual Master Plan, there is a proposed interconnection to the adjoining property to the east — Addie's Corner commercial PUD. Native vegetation preserve and open spaces are proposed between the subject project and the adjoining properties to the north and most of the properties to the west thereby precluding interconnections in that area. In addition, most properties to the west are developed with single-family homes. The main access to and from the proposed PUD is from the south -Immokalee Road) Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. (Preserves,golf course, lakes and other open spaces are provided; different housing types are included; a clubhouse is allowed in the PUD — these are sometimes used for civic purposes, e.g. polling place. Sidewalks are being proposed as part of this petition though an existing deviation allows them to be provided only on one side of many roadways.) Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed petition to amend and expand the Mirasol RPUD to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 7 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 542.3 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained for the PUD. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLUE and FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff believes the petition is consistent with the FLUM and the FLUE as indicated previously in the GMP discussion. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as previously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be found consistent with the CCME. Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals,objective and policies of the overall GMP. ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. No changes to environmental portions of the previously approved PUD are proposed except for an increase in acreage of the preserve and the addition of the Hearing Examiner for determinations on additional allowable uses within preserves. Pursuant to Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances, the project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). There are no impacts or changes in location to previously approved preserves and no additional listed species have been identified on-site. Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues. The PUD document contains the mitigation discussed in the Transportation Element section of this staff report. Utilities Review: The applicant has provided the stipulations requested by Utilities Review staff within the PUD document. PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 8 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 Zoning Services Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location. Zoning staff is of the opinion that this project will be compatible with and complementary to, the surrounding land uses only if other limitations are included. To support that opinion staff offers the following analysis of this project. The development standards contained in Exhibit B of the PUD document show the following: TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "RG"RESIDENTIAL AREAS PERMITTED Single Zero Multi- Clubhouse/ USES Family Lot Two Family Townhouse Family Recreation AND Detached Line and Duplex *12 Dwelling Buildings *12 *6 STANDARDS Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a lot or unit *3 Minimum Lot Width*4 50'*7 40'*7 35'per lot 20' 90' n/a or unit*7 Front Yard 20'*2*7 20'*2*7 20'*2*7 20'*2 20'*2 25' Setback 2* Side Yard Setback 12 5' 0 or 10' 7.5' *8 7.5'*8 10'or 1/2 5' *11 Ik7 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet*5 Rear Yard Setback"1 15'*7 i ' 15'*7 10' 15'*7 10' I--5 43-.10' 0' Setback From Golf 10'.7 10'V 10' 10' 10' 20' Course Setbacks from Preserves 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 35' 50'(5 stories 50'(2 *10 not to stories-ever exceed 50') g-net *9 te-exceed 50') Actual Height 45' 45' 45' 45' 65' 75' *10 Floor Area Min.Per Unit 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a (S.F.) PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 9 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7117/14 Distance Between 10' 10' 10' 10' 20'or '/s 15'or.5 Principal Structures SUM of BH BH for whichever structures is greater*6 exceeding 35' *5 Single Zero Two Family Townhouse Multi- Clubhouse/ Family Lot and Duplex Family Recreation Accessory Detached Line Dwelling Buildings Structures *6 Front Yard SPS*7 SPS*7 SPS SPS SPS SPS Setback*2 Side Yard Setback 5'V 0 or 10' 5' 5' 10'or 1/2 5' BH for structures exceeding 35 feet*5 Rear Yard Accessory 5' 7 5' 7 5' 5' 10' 5' Setback*1 Setback From 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Preserves Distance Between 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' Accessory Structures on the same lot Distance Between 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or S' Accessory and Principal Structures on same lot Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' 35' *10 Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 45' 45' *10 Front yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). *1 -Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0 feet provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Review Section. *2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and . t - _ • . : driveways may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet for a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings, as defined in the LDC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide for guest parking may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction shall not result in an approval to impede or block the sidewalk, Front loaded garages shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk. *3 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 square feet for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet. *4—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *5- Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum of the height of the garages. PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 10 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 *6 Although neither setbacks nor separation between structures are applicable to the clubhouse and other recreation structures located on a clubhouse tract,neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary. *7-The use of flag lots is allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths. However, neither the minimum lot area, nor the minimum distance between structures may be reduced. *8-Zero foot(0')setback for internal units. *9 Inclusive of under building parking *10 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of Immokalee Road. *11 5' side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to or lesser than 70' in width,Lots greater than 70' in width will provide 6' side yard setbacks. *12 Maximum length of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear feet. BH—Building Height SPS=Same as Principal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing; none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they are listed as deviations on Exhibit E.None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. The Development Standards Table is not significantly different from what was approved in the 2012 PUD amendment provided above by strike thru and underlining. As shown in the aerial photograph located on page 2 of the staff report,the surrounding land use and zoning discussion of this staff report,and the Master Plan,the site is bounded to the north by developed residential uses within the City of Bonita Springs. To the east in Sections 11, 14, and 23 is the developing Heritage Bay PUD/DRI mixed use project. Also to the east, within Section 22 are the undeveloped commercial PUD zoned projects known as the Tree Farm PUD and Addie's Corner PUD. The Tree Farm PUD is separated from the subject site by four 5± acre tracts,three of which have home sites on them; all are agriculturally zoned. To the west are several residential projects--Parklands PUD/DR1 (in Section 9) which is undeveloped; Terafina PUD (in Section 16) that is developing as Riverstone; and Old Cypress PUD/DRI (in Section 21 and Section 22)which is largely already developed. In Section 22 east of Olde Cypress are agricultural and residentially used properties along Nursery Lane Rose Boulevard and Woodland Avenue that have a zoning designation of Agricultural. There is also a small C-3 vacant tract fronting on Immokalee Road. To the south is a canal and then Immokalee Road. The applicant is adding 20 acres to the Mirasol project. The acreage being added is located to the southeast of the existing project south of Broken Back Road. The acreage to be added is shown below in the excerpt from the Zoning Map with cross-hatching. Most of the area being added will be utilized as developable area shown as R/G or Lakes on the Master Plan. A small area is shown as preserve area. In any case, preserve areas will separate the developed portions PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 11 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 of the project from the uses along Nursery Lane, Woodland Avenue and Rose Boulevard. Preserves will also separate this project from Terafina and Parklands and most of Heritage Bay. The applicant is not proposing to decrease side yard setbacks from what was previously approved except for the Multi-Family area. Rear setbacks are proposed to be reduced from 15 feet to 10 feet for all uses; but no other changes to the property development regulations are proposed, thus staff believes the property development regulations keep the project compatible with the surrounding uses. FINDINGS OF FACT: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below. [Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold, non-italicized font]: PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that,"In support of its recommendation,the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and believes the uses as limited by the property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The commitments made by the applicant should provide adequate assurances that the proposed change should not adversely affect living conditions in the area. In addition, as limited above, the proposed property development regulations provide adequate assurances that the proposed project will be suitable to the type and pattern of development in the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense, Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to obtain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 12 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis and Deviation Discussion sections of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses, development standards and developer commitments will help ensure that this project is compatible both internally and externally. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project as noted in the GMP FLUE and Transportation Element consistency review, if the mitigation proposed by the petitioner is included in any approval recommendation. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is not seeking approval of any additional deviations as part of this amendment. PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 13 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised. 7/17/14 Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, &policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The comprehensive Planning Staff has provided an in-depth analysis of the GMP FLUE and FLUM provisions; zoning analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed amendment. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element based upon the review provided by the reviewers responsible for that task. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern; Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis. Staff believes the proposed amendment is appropriate given the existing land use pattern, and development restrictions included in the PUD Ordinance. An excerpt from the map prepared by the Collier County GIS/CAD Mapping Section is provided earlier (Excerpt from PUD map 6/2014) that shows the adjacent projects discussed previously. The uses proposed or developing in the Parklands, Heritage Bay, Quail West,Terafina and Olde Cypress PUD zoned projects are similar to Mirasol. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; The proposed PUD amendment would not create an isolated zoning district because the majority of the site is already zoned PUD. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Staff is of the opinion that the district boundaries are logically drawn given the current property ownership boundaries and the proposed purchase and the existing PUD zoning. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed amendment is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek changes. The rezone and amendment to the existing PUD will allow the owner the opportunity to develop the land in a manner other than what the PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 14 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 existing zoning district would allow. Without this amendment, the property could be developed in compliance with the existing Agricultural zoning and the existing PUD ordinance regulations. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed petition, subject to the proposed list of uses and property development regulations and the proposed Development Commitments detailed in Exhibit F, is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element(FLUE) of the GMP. Therefore,the proposed change should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time subject to the Transportation Commitments contained in Exhibit F of the RPUD ordinance. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed change should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have other specific regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this petition is approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This project's property development regulations provide adequate setbacks and distances between structures; therefore the project should not significantly reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results,which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 15 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 The proposed changes in this petition are not anticipated to be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; The proposed development complies with the Growth Management Plan which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The PUD zoned subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations except for the lands being added which are not zoned PUD. The petitioner is seeking this rezone and amendment in compliance with LDC provisions for such action. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone and amendment meets the intent of the PUD district regulations, if staff's stipulations are addressed, and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; As noted previously, the proposed rezone boundary follows the existing and proposed property ownership boundary. The GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban- designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the sole determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a particular zoning petition. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC. The proposed rezone and amendment are consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 16 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities,except as it may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): The applicant,Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC, in conjunction with his agents, Richard Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Alexis Crespo, AICP, of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. conducted a duly noticed Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on July 10,2014. The synopsis of that meeting is attached. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on July 16,2014. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-A-PL20140000099 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 17 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 7/17/14 PREPARED BY: t<OL41. & 4 KAY OESELEM,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWED BY: 7 7/9( 1q- RAY D V. BELLOWS,WS ZONING MANAGER DATE DEPAR 'MENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 7- 'a- ' `/ MIKE BOSI, AICP,DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING APP: ! ED BY: NI ASA •NGU ' , • D 'l ISTRATOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Attachment: NIM synopsis Tentatively scheduled for the October 14,2014 Board of County Commissioners Meeting PUDZ-A-PL20140000099: MIRASOL RPUD Page 18 of 18 August 21,2014 CCPC Revised: 6125114 - WALDROP ENGINEERING I / CIVIL ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS //\ 44 04� qy PNICATgAARFZEZMAna a Memorandum To: Kay Deselem From: Alexis Crespo cc: Rich Yovanovich Date: July 10,2014 Subject: Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD(FKA 1VTirasol)(PUDA-PL2014-099) Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples, LLC, in conjunction with Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIIM) on Thursday, July 10, 2014. The meeting was held at 6:00 p.m. at St. Monica's Episcopal Church at 7070 Immokalee Road. The sign-in sheet is attached as Exhibit "A", and demonstrates approximately 11 residents were in attendance, not including the consultant team. Handouts were distributed outlining the project overview,proposed uses,and site development regulations,and are attached as Exhibit"B". Alexis Crespo (Agent) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team, and an overview of the rezoning process. Mrs. Crespo outlined the public input opportunities throughout the process, and noted that dates the Planning Commission is scheduled for August 21, 2014 and the Board of County Commission hearing is scheduled for October 14,2014. Mrs. Crespo provided an overview of the project Iocation and history, and pointed out the location of the acreage being added to the PUD. She also outlined the handouts provided to attendees. Mrs. Crespo presented the approved PUD Master Plan and proposed PUD master plan, as well as an aerial of the site,noting the additional preserve area, and the additional 112 units going on the 19.7+/-acre parcel. Following the Consultant's presentation,the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the Agent and Applicant questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. Question/Comment 1: How far is the separation between the Quarry and the proposed additional 19.7 acres in the Esplanade project? Response: Several hundred feet separation. Page 1 of 4 Question/Comment 2:Are those single-family or high-rise(additional units being added)? Response: Our maximum building height for multi-family is 50 feet. We are requesting any mix of dwelling types on the parcel,so it could be multi-family. Our intent now is to do single family units, however I have to be very clear our zoning application would allow a flexible mix of units. Question/Comment 3: The construction results in noise, blasting, smoke, so forth, to what degree will this add to the noise, the blasting and all the other issues that we've had to endure the past two years? Response: Taylor Morrison will have to do some clearing, and digging of the lakes and excavation. In terms of time frame we'd hope to have that wrapped up in 2015. This project probably won't start until July 2015,blasting might go on for a month or so. Question/Comment 4: You probably won't blast there because of its proximity (to existing residential units),or will you blast? Response: That's all regulated, so the amount that they can blast and the strength of the blasting will be based upon proximity to existing structures and other regulated factors. Question/Comment 5 & 6: I'm in the development that's closest to what's supposedly going to be the extension of Collier Blvd., which I don't think is going to happen for quite a while, will the trucks be entering around the back(Broken Back Road)? Response:Resident vehicles will enter from the Immokalee entrance. The construction entrance will remain off of Broken Back Road. Question/Comment 7: We assume eventually you're going to put up some trees and something on your property,right? Response: Yes, the berm is installed. The gap is for the proposed Blvd. road. Landscaping will be provided per the code. Question/Comment 8:That's where the second entrance will be? Response:Yes. [Consultant showed location on map]. Question/Comment 9: Will the construction trailer be there forever? Response: That's a construction trailer for the staff, and it will be removed when construction is complete. Question/Comment 10: Is there any way to shield that because we see the trailer from our home, unfortunately our berm that was put in by Pulte isn't high enough and some of the trees are filled in so we're seeing the roof of your trailer and every big truck that comes in and hear every big truck. The blasting was shaking the houses by the way. Response:The good news for the project that's going on now the only blasting that's left is way up in the North part.The trailer is temporary and is permitted by the County with the required screening. Question/Comment 11:But when you start it'll be down here again?Will there be a lake? Response: Yeah,but it is a small lake.These are temporary results from the construction process. Question/Comment 12:What will the impact be to traffic on Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd.It's bad enough now and we're not even in season and all that traffic from the Esplanade dumps onto Immokalee. Page 2 of 4 Response: Our zoning has commitments in place for the developer to pay their fair share of improvements as required at the intersection. Question/Comment 13: There is no intersection, there's no light. When they were developing they were driving down our road to go do their thing and ripping up our road and not paying for it. Response: You are referring to the restoration area (next to Rose Blvd.) on the west side of the property. The clearing was required as part of the environmental permits. Taylor Morrison had to recreate wetland area on that 200 acres on the west side of the project. Re-vegetation will be occurring, and that was actually required for the development to recreate some habitat and get some of that melaleuca and exotics out of there. Question/Comment 14: You have 2,000-3,000 more automobiles coming out and they all have to turn right,west,what do you plan to do when they start going back to the east is there going to be an intersection there in front of the main entrance?Is there going to be a light? Response: In front of the main entrance, no, that's not intended to be a light. It doesn't trigger the warrants to do that.What will be improved is the intersection at the 951/Collier Blvd.and Immokalee road. In order to get a signal you have to demonstrate that you have enough volume to require that, and also spacing is a big thing.You can't have signalized entrances too close together. Question/Comment 15: You've got Laurel Lakes and Key Royal across the street. You've got people trying to go east people trying to U-turn and go west, when they come out of your place and go west.They are going to go down just a few feet. Response: It's a requirement in our zoning that says that our back gate has to be improved to regular access for residents by the time a certain number of dwelling units are constructed. Question/Comment 16:What back gate? Response: The one that goes out on to the future Collier Blvd. extension back here. We are paying for our fair share of improvements to Broken Back Rd.between the Quarry. Question/Comment 17: And right now that's the road to nowhere, so when is that going to be finished in terms of having two lanes coming out of it? Response: We don't have our transportation consultant here, but if we have your email we can follow up with you and let you know the unit trigger. Question/Comment 18:Will there be two lanes outside of the Quarry? Response: You see what's out there now, it'll be two lanes of new construction, those are the proposed two northbound lanes. Where the current zone is those two lanes will be the southbound,so it will be a four-lane road.The Quarry side is already built. Question/Comment 19: The people of Pulte honored their commitment and already built that and that's why it's the road to nowhere at the moment. Response: I found it(the unit trigger to construct the Broken Back Road entrance),at the issuance of the 400th unit(in response to Question 18). Question/Comment 20: What is this projected 400`h unit? Response: That's what will trigger improvement of the roadway.This has been coordinated with the County and property owners in this area,as well as representatives of The Quarry. Page 3 of 4 Question/Comment 21: If you're only asking for an additional 112 what's the 400 units have to do with it. Response: The overall development allows 1,233 units upon approval of this amendment,so we will hit that threshold. Question/Comment 22; How long will the back exit be closed while they are expanding the two or three lanes.How many months will that be? Response: I don't actually have an answer for that question, that's a question for the County. As much as this development is triggering that roadway,The Quarry is also triggering the need for the road as well. We will follow up via email. Question/Comment 23: There's no further development The Quarry is required(to do).I have been through 1,147 pages of contract. The Quarry has done its commitment on that. What I want to know is what you people are going to do,and then while that bridge is being rebuilt how long is it going to take,and how long are we no longer going to have a second entry and second exit? Response: We will ask Collier Transportation Planning Staff and let you know how long the bridge will be closed,if at all,to improve the intersection. Question/Comment 24: The problem is its going to affect people living in Esplanade greatly because if you don't have a construction entrance than all of your vehicles are going to have to go through the main gate at Esplanade, so it's going to be a big inconvenience for those people.It's not just going to affect The Quarry,but it's going to affect people living there,those people who've paid a lot of money for their house. Response: They may, for maintenance and traffic,maintain the existing bridge through the course of construction of the new bridge,and then demolish the existing bridge. Question/Comment 25: No, because there's a hydraulic structure there, they can't do that. There is hydraulic piping on both sides therefore you cannot suspend the use of that bridge. Response:We'll get you an answer. Question/Comment 26:What is planned for the land west of the CVS? Response: That property is owned by others.Taylor Morrison is not developing that property. Question/Comment 27: Does anybody know what that is going to be? Response: It's got zoning in place for a mix of uses,but I'm not aware of any eminent development plans for that property, but we don't represent the owners. Maybe Kay knows. It was approved as a PUD with a variety of uses. Question/Comment 28:And all along here,do you have any idea what's going there?Commercial? Response:I think that's part of Heritage Bay PUD/DRI,I don't know the development plans. Question/Comment 29: So there are no plans to acquire and develop that portion of property? Response:No. There were no further questions or comments. Mrs. Crespo thanked attendees for coming and advised they would respond to the specific questions about the bridge soon. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:30 p.m.The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit"C". Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A ESPLANADE NAPLES NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET JULY 10, 2014 NAME EMAIL D(ANN E I141d 'S I7 by S @ P L C,Ofva c - ►l v1 f v\e !-� Z Se__\c„- S ( $,1(sb v� ,,„,e o C - fh��fl-s6 � AO L.Ga wt, beAvt loct 1 .54n-kttiC /k 4'4' CgYIC6 -T-0 � i 1 c.n� .►, z ,n "E V ,21,- S8 C Flo btt, Ne r '"":277 b r i n e` c k ear nS@ Incti L corn EXHIBIT B Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples (RPUD) Neighborhood Information Meeting July 10,2014—6:00 p.m.—7070 Immokalee Rd. —St. Monica's Episcopal Church Project Information Sheet Project Size: 1,658.3+/-acres (1,638.6+/- acres currently approved) Native Vegetation: 542.3+/- acres (537.4+1-acres currently approved) Development Area: 729.5 acres (709.8+/- acres currently approved) Future Land Use: Urban Residential Subdistrict& Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay Current Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) & Rural Agricultural (A) Current Use: Residential, Golf Course& Preserve Proposed Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) Proposed Density/Uses: Maximum of 1,233 dwelling units (an increase of 112 units) (currently approved for 1,121 units with up to 18 holes of golf) Maximum Attainable Density: 2,084 dwelling units ESPLANADE GOLF& COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD PERMITTED USES A maximum of 1,233 residential units and a maximum of 18 golf course holes may be developed within the RPUD. I. Residential/Golf Tracts(RG): A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family detached dwelling units. 2. Zero lot line dwelling units. 3. Townhouse dwellings. 4. Two-family and duplex dwellings. 5. Multiple-family dwellings. 6. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner determine to be compatible in the"RG"district. B. Accessory Uses/Structures: 1. Uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted 2. Guest houses. 3. Common area recreation facilities for residents and their guests. 4. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas,fitness trails and shelters. 5. Model homes, model home sales centers, and sales trailers, including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, as well as resale and rental of units. 6. Golf course,practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns,rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards for residents and their guests. 7. Golf Club Complex as located on the Master Plan: i) Retail establishments accessory to the permitted uses in the District such as, but not limited to, golf, tennis and recreation related sales for residents and their guests. ii) Restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses for residents and their guests. iii) Pro-shops, golf club, tennis clubs,and health spas for residents and their guests. iv) Golf course,practice areas and ranges,golf cart barns,rest rooms,shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards and facilities. 8. Shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, and other types of accessory facilities intended for outdoor recreation for residents and their guests. 9. Guardhouses, gatehouses,and access control structures. 10.Essential services,pursuant to the LDC. 11. Water management facilities and related structures. 12.Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or architectural or structural bank treatments. 13.Parks, recreational facilities, community centers for residents and their guests. 14.Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the developer, builders, and their authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways,parking areas and related uses. 15.Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffer berms, fences and walls. 16.Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the"RG"district. H. Conservation/Preserve Tract: A. Principal Uses: 1. Passive recreation uses limited to the following so long as clearing for such uses does not result in the reduction of preserve acreage below the minimum requirement: i.Boardwalks ii. Environmental uses(wetland and conservation areas) Pedestrian bridges iv. Pervious nature trails except where American Disabilities Act requires otherwise. v.Native Wildlife sanctuary vi. Inclement weather shelters, in preserve upland areas only unless constructed as part of a permitted boardwalk system. The shelters shall be a maximum of 150 square feet each. 2. Environmental research 3. Drainage and water management facilities subject to all required permits. 4. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list or permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner through the process outlined in the LDC. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ESPLANADE GOLF&COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD PERMITTED Single Zero Multi- Clubhouse/ USES Family Lot Two Family Townhouse Family Recreation AND Detached Line and Duplex Dwelling Buildings STANDARDS Principal Structures ^ Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a lot or unit Minimum Lot Width 50' 40' 35'per lot 20' 90' n/a or unit Front Yard Setback 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' 25' Side Yard 5' 0 or 10' 7,5' 7.5' 10'or 1/2 5' Setback BH for structures exceeding 35 feet Rear Yard Setback 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 0' Setback From Golf Course 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 20' Setbacks from Preserves 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Maximum 35' 35' 35' �35' 50'(5 stories 50' Zoned Height not to exceed 50') Actual Height 45' 45' 45' 45' 65' 75' Floor Area Min.Per Unit(S.F.) 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF n/a Distance Between 10' 10' 10' 10' 20'or '/z 15'or.5 BH Principal Structures SUM of BH whichever is for greater structures exceeding 35' Accessory Single Zero Two Family Townhouse Multi- Clubhouse/ Structures Family Lot and Duplex Family Recreation Detached Line Dwelling Buildings Front Yard Setback SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side Yard Setback 5' 0 or 10' 5' 5' 10'or 1/2 5' BH for structures exceeding 35 feet Rear Yard Accessory Setback 5' 5' 5' 5' 10' 5' Setback From Preserves 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Distance Between 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' Accessory Structures on the same lot Distance Between Accessory 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' and Principal Structures on same lot Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' 35' Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 45' 45' *SPS=Same as Principal Structure *BFI=Building Height ORDINANCE NO. 14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2009-21, THE MIRASOL RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AS AMENDED, BY INCREASING THE PERMISSIBLE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 1,121 TO 1,233; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL i 19.71 ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) TO THE MIRASOL RPUD; BY CHANGING THE NAME OF THE RPUD FROM THE MIRASOL. RPUD TO THE ESPLANADE GOLF ,& COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD; BY INCREASING THE DWELLING UNITS FROM 1,121 TO 1,233; BY REVISING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER • PLAN AND REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS: THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF.IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) BORDERED ON THE EAST BY FUTURE COLLIER BOULEVARD ;(CR. 951) IN SECTIONS 1.0, 1.5 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 1,658.31 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ]PETITION PUDZA-PL20140000099j WHEREAS, TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE NAPLES LLC, represented by Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Alexis Crespo,. AICP of Waldrop Engineering,;P..A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the RPUD and change the zoning classification of the additional herein described real property: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,.FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of approximately 19.7 acres of the herein described real property located in Se ction.'22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; Collier County, Florida:is changed from a Rural Agricultural zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district together with the existing Mirasol RPUD for a 1,658.3±acre project to be now known as the Esplanade Golf&Country.Club of Naples RPUD in accordance with the revised.Exhibits A-F, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code,:is/are hereby amended accordingly. Mirasol P:UDZ.A:1 PlfDZA=PL2(1140000099 Page I of 2 is Rev:7/.17114 SECTION TWO Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this day of ,2014. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING,Chairman Approved as to form and legality:. Heidi Ashton-Cieko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A- Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development Standards Exhibit B2- Flag Lot Scenario Exhibit C Location Map Exhibit C2- Master Plan Exhibit D Legal DeSeription Exhibit.E-. Deviations Exhibit F- Developer Commitments CR14-CPS-01303134 Mirasol PUMA N PUDZA-PL20140000099 Page 2 Of 2 Rev.7/17/14 i EXHIBIT A FOR I MIRASOL ESPLANADE GOLF&:COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD PERMITTED USES:. A.:maximum of 121 1,231 residential units and a:maximunr of 18 golf course holes may be developed. within the RPUD. 1. Residential/Golf Tracts'(RG): A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family detached dwelling units. 2. Zero lot line dwelling units, 3. Townhouse dwellings. 4. Two-family and duplex dwellings. 5. Multiple-family dwellings. 6. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and. which the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing. Examiner determines to be compatible in the"RG"district. B. Accessory Uses/Structures: I. Uses and structures:customarily associated with principal uses permitted 2. Guest houses. 3. Common area recreation facilities for residents and their guests: 4. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks,nature trails, bikeways, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and•shelters. 5,. Model homes, model home sales centers, and sales trailers; including offices for project administration,construction, sales and marketing, as well as resale and rental of units, 6. Golf course,practice areas and ranges,golf cart barns,rest rooms, shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards for residents and their guests, PIJDZ-A P1.2Q14-09.9 Strike-through text is deleted Page I.of 21 Esplanade Clolf&Country`Club of Naples RPUD. Underline text is added. Lust.Revised:June 27,2(114 7. Golf Club Complex as,loeated on the Master Plan: i) Retail establishments accessory to the permitted.uses in the District such as, but not limited to,golf,tennis and recreation related sales for residents and their guests ii) Restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar .uses for residents and their guests, iii) Pro-shops, golf club, tennis clubs,and health spas for residents and their guests. iv) Golf course,practice areas and ranges,golf cart barns,rest rooms,. shelters snack bars and golf course maintenance yards and facilities. 8. Shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, and other types of accessory facilities intended for outdoor recreation for residents and their guests. 9. Guardhouses, gatehouses,and access control structures. 10.Essential services,pursuant to the LDC: 11. Water management facilities and related structures.. 12. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or architectural or structural bank treatments: 13..Parksi recreational facilities,community centers for residents and their guests. 14 Temporary construction, sales,and administrative offices for the developer, builders, and their authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways,. parking areas and related uses. 15.Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffer berms, fences and walls. 16.Any other accessory use which is comparable.in.nature with the foregoing.Uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or l-learing Examiner determines to be compatible in the"RG"district. IL Conservation/Preserve:Tract: A. Principal.Uses: 1. Passive recreation uses limited to the following to long as clearing for such uses does not result in the reduction of preserve acreage below the minimum:requirement PULL-A-PL3014=099 Strike-through text is deleted lisplanadt Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD underline text is added. Page 2 of 21 Last Revised:June 27,2014 i. Boardwalks ii, Environmental uses(wetland and conservation areas) iii.Pedestrian bridges iv.Pervious nature trails except where American Disab ilities Act requires otherwise. v. Native Wildlife sanctuary vi:Inclement weather shelters; in preserve upland:areas only unless constructed as part of a permitted boardwalk system. The shelters shall be a maximum of 150 square feet each. 2. Environmental research. 3, Drainage and water management facilities subject to all required permits. 4. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list or permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner through the process outlined in the LDC. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 •Strike-through text is deleted Page 3 o 21 Esplanade Coll&Country Club ofNaples RPM Underline text is added Last Revised:June 27,2014 Nommorm EXHIBIT.B FOR ' l M1RASO1,ESPLANADE GOLF&.COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan(SDP)or subdivision plat. TABLE.I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR. "RG"RESIDENTIAL AREAS PERMITTED Single Zero Multi Clubhouse/ USES Family Lot Two Family Townhouse Family Recreation AND Detached Line and Duplex *12 Dwelling Buildings STANDARDS *12 *b Principal Structures Minimum Lot 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 2,000 SF 9,000 SF n/a Area lot or unit. *3 Minmum'Lot 50'`*7 40'*7 35'per lot 20' w90' n/a Width*4 or unit*7 Front Yard 20'*2*7 20'*2*7 20'*2*7 20'*2 20'*2 25' Setback 2* Side Yard 5'17 0 or 10' 7.5'*7*8 7.5'*8 10'or 1/2 5' Setback 2 *11 *7 BH for structures exceeding 35 feet*5. Rear Yard 15'*7 10' 15'*7 It l5'*7, (I L' a5'a 5!10' 0' Setback*1 Setback From 10'17 10' 10' 10' 10' 20' Golf Course Setbacks front 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Preserves Maximum 35' 35' 35' 35' 50''(5 stories 50'(2-stet*. Zoned Height not to everting-net *10 exceed 50') to exceed.-50' *9 Actual Height 45' 45' 45' 45' 65' 75' *10 Floor Area Min.Per Unit(S.F.) 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF nfa. Distance 10' 10' ( 10' 10' 20'or.'Y2 15'or.5 BH Between SUM of 131-1 whichever is Principal for greater*6 Structures 'structures exceeding 35'*5 1i'D7.-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text Is deleted Page 4 of 21 Esplanade Coll&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:June 27,2014 1 1 Single Zero Two Fancily Townhouse Multi- Clubhouse/ Family Lot and Duple* Family Recreation Accessory Detached Line Dwelling Buildings Structures *6. Front Yard SPS*7 SPS"7 Sf'S SPS SI'S SPS Setback*2 Side Yard 5'Li O or 10' 5' 5' 10'or 1/2 r 5' Setback ' BH f structures exceeding 435 feet*5 Rear Yard 5' 5' V 5' 5' I0' 5' _ Accessory Setback *1 . Setback From rom 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Preserves Distance 0'or.10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' ' 0'or 10' 0'or 10' Between Accessory Structures on the same lot IDistance 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5' 0'or 5° O'or 5' 0'or 5' Between I Accessory and Principal. Structures on same lot Maximum SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' 35' Zoned Height *10 1 Actual Height. SPS SPS SPS SPS 45' _ 45' *10 Front yards for all uses shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by public road right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right=of way.line. If the parcel is served bya private road,setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed):or edge 0 pavement(if not curbed). 'I - Rear yawls for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut lakes and open spaces. Setbacks from lakes for all principal and accessory uses may be 0'feet provided architectural hank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from the Collier County Engineering Review Section,. *2 - Single-family dwellings, as defined In the LDC which provide for two parking spaces within an.enclosed garage.un vide-der guest parking-e -in-private-driveways may reduce the front yard requirement to 10 feet far:a side entry garage. Multi-family dwellings,as dciined in the I;DC, which provide for two parking spaces within an enclosed garage and provide.for guest parking;may reduce the front yard to 15 feet. This reduction.shall not result in an approval to impede or block the.sidewalk, Front loaded garages shall be.a minimum of 23 feet from the-edge of sidewalk. *3 -Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot urea allocation of 3,500 square feet for total minimum lot area of 7,000 square.feet. *4-Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20°/n..for cul-de-sac lots provided the:minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *5- Building distance may be reduced at garages to half the sum or the height of the garages, PUDL-A-P1.2014-099 .Sirike-through text it deleted Page 5 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of_Naples RPUI Underline text Is added Last.Revised:June 27,2014 I i *6 Although neither setbacks nor separation. between structures are applicable to the clubhouse.and othet recreation.structures:located on a clubhouse tract, neither the clubhouse nor any other recreational structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from any residential or preservation boundary. *7 The use of flag lots is:allowed to provide maximum flexibility in subdivision design and may vary from the minimum lot widths: However; neither the minimum lot area, nor the niinititurn distance between'structures may be reduced. *8- 'hero foot(0)setback for internal units. *9 Inclusive of under building parking *l0 Buildings shall not exceed three stories within 1,250 feet of ltnmokalee Road. *11.5'side yard setbacks shall apply to lots equal to:or lessee than 70' in width, Lots greater'than 70' in width will provide 6'side yard setbacks;. *12 Maximum:length:of buildings shall not exceed 300 linear.feet. Bhl- Building Height SPS m Same as Prinvipal Structure Notwithstanding the foregoing;none of the footnotes shall operate as a deviation from the Land Development Code unless they arc listed as deviations on Exhibit E,None of the footnotes operate as deviations from the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is•deleted Page 6 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club.of Naples RPUD Underline iexi is added Last Revised:June 27,2014 i BURRING FOOTPRINT i s I 4 0 t I ftAO LOT ,ij cc I 1 . t Il „.... , 4... _ RIOLOI f I I I I 1 _„, ,.] MAO l DENOTES LOT LINE NOTE: THIS EXIIISIT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES TO SNOW NOW CERTAIN OELINETRY OFA CIYEN TRACT WOULD FACILITATE THE IM1PLERENTATION OF A'RTAS LOT"DESIGN LAYOUT. Mirmigloimmuisromileuri 0 50 100 200. SCALE IN FEET PRLPAREo ton. PR. C1 RAVE I.M. COLLIER JOINT VENTURE MIRASOL PUDA 1 GANce.etA.Ahrrh.{..Nr.4144e I44 v K4 OA+ANC NAND: : .AGN"07.I ! ARBER&' FLAG LOT SCENARIO EXHIBIT'82' st star RU.NDAGE,INC: RR Awed Sr RVP ABB PRO,Kc,RD.: X883 Prufessionnl Engineers.Planners 64 Land Surveyors aromas BY, .ROP HEAD JILE MANE` HardtX8-11-2 cwv G...71 NA.T..;,d Tea n.NhAo.n..i.i11 $.wr 19/nit to.NANMAIM alts.. of/OU WAIONC(AL No.: .M/A SEMI: N A WC r. 1 Or 1 PUDZ-A-PL2UI4•099, Strike-through text.Is deleted Cage 7 ul'?1 Esplanade Oolf&:Country Club of Naples RJ'UI) Underline teat is added Last Revised:June 27,2014 I i• ... • I . .. . . , SEE SHEET#2 FOR CONTINUATION • . - • • . • •,..'...,. ..-.,......,,,.....!:.....;.:. : L : ' • .•:::,..:• -:•!*,.. • •.7;,...'... • •• • .'•. • • •-..•• , FOR PLAN UPEND AND ":-;',•,,..- ' '',••' •• R/O L . • - ,.'„,.,•,;•,..,7„!.,;,,,,...•••••,*' SPECIAL NOTE/SEE "•':',..:':7. ' • • ...':' ,-.'.".'.,..'.!.'.'.' RREET 1 OT I . . *.*: . '. . ....... . . .. ' '. ..'`...•.•:-".:?..i.: .• . ...'.:*:'.:.': •.*:-:-• ' .•• ' • •'• •‘ ..1 A i • . . . s . • ' .... . . ... . . Vie — ' . S \- N Rig s . s ; •-:-: !:7.-:- . . §r ss . . • -• • . • . 74! -.....•.•.- s tj TOME*-'4!.'.'.'.' 1011.1. 1 RIO Q. §1 .▪. , . . . s„ RIG !•:7:t•.'":'::.': .•• .\Pk. ' \It -- PRESERVE ''':':':•:':' CUP HOUK CONKER R/O ■ . s HERITARE ;'.':.''.•' N go ..,.%!. • Rid .';'...7.* . •...• . . \ - 7::::::•:.,;.::. . • 41 ,•.......„....,., - :":••••• • . . .. • 1 4. . , • i 74i ..$ SS:•:• . •.•.•..e.:•:•;•.• ':• :.....'....':;.'. ....:.:::::::;:::i • II''''4' ,,,,—ENTRY ' i $4111A41, ••....• •:':'."•. ..-..•:, •' i .,,,i' ITYP.) ‘11 '•**7','..,,:".. ': . ..,,,,,. .--PRIVATE MK . . .•. . . . a.- -- ..* .'.'..!':',.•.'...`. . • .•:-......:*:, '.':";':•:"..'.:''.."..'. ' :..-:t:.:::::::::. (--"- "r...:4:....1.,,,..':. .."/(;i! -100.1TROPORBR RA.9S1 EXT. 1.0.10391E411011 . 1410XTINA/144 MAO . . 1 . *:„....!..%!.;!■!.....1....!..'...:..' . IN . TREE WEN ' :". *:'.." ' • '••••"• ••••• • ■i.IRRICEAW" 004P) . . :t':"....I..!...';' ;':',.! !'' '' • --Mtge SPINE -11\11 ROM .'.'.'.7.4'."''•:'.'."7.':':..i:.4.,. - • • . . •OW' '* * ':':'••.'":•7••'•'!. ' ' . CONSES El Eii::-.,.. ..7.,:,:•:...i. R/0 •• .. g 1/1- tonoi Ell Ell•:. . .•• ?..- '-,• .. ti RiO WALDROP Ea its.!,....-......,,,, , ,- NM Ill ....:.1r:i...',..'7.' 6. -um. 1 ENGINEHIONG . . . . . P""Rff gll Ell,: :;:-:.: ::.:..:' Ri! . 0,.......40..WO "avnorapNopNwoui, .. BOUNDARY • Ell Ell: ....7...'::!%. . 1 NrnegonisalWaie Dow,swills row yawn N.Nous-- ES Ell ::; ; h VN4INLIWN filliM41441011 IC 1 . PPMA•60.16.1.110.W.Clie. Nell11:11101111:-17:' ,:: . . routge: fibrit■aeillfteVerNITIMIWAIIINIIM.: . Mill.111;11011;1;:':.* 1L -. - - if-tuning' ESPLANADE GOLF witucPs •.:,.,:.:'• RIG Ai / IllitoNftY. AND COUNTRY 11111111113 V::-.-..:: - Finn' : CLUB OF NAPLES ELM:-0.:•:•:‘:1 .• :,. 401Lriki ,i'. = RPIJIY: ili !!'IMIP,Il Cl: •:-.•:•.••• - - r , . .• . ma ■•'•'--•.4% • 41 --.' 1 CONCEPTUAL IOC MIN ".. • • • • • la IN‘. • •'• ••. • • =0111111 . . 1, MASTER PLAN R4M0REIER ROAI EEJE,44.1 j • N W EXHIBIT'Vla. . ..: SO'TYPE . ow 'W LEA, SHEET 1 OF 1 smut* , pm) PILE NAME:2700130412.1ks UPORTRIT:20k4-03.06 PO DZ-A-Pt.20 14.,099• deleted Strike-through text ls d Page 8-of21 EplitiradO,C:rolf&COuntry Club of Naplos.RPUD Underline text isindded• IAst Revised:June 27,2014 l 1 I 1 s N: LEE COUNTY _.._.,._... ---_-._ ▪ •.pcwe:r.00rr,r • • • • r 1 ♦ ,• M•1 •• • .♦ • . R R OQiPANC1 •• • • a .,',•.*.".:`,.. ow** • s • ♦.. • • {•• 4 • • • • • • • r .�••x�....44 —___ • • (ttFfi] 'r' ••�� •R.• • .e •i .i\.. •,• .• VACANT • ' ••.. (Al. • . VACANT 41.11111M•A._ ...,...t:::.:.:.:.:::i.:::.,.......::,:,y.:.:::.:.....,,.......„:,,,,,e,:.:,......::„. ::::.:,--. ....t,... ......: :.-...i.. .r.7.:::,,..:.....,:,,,,::;:::,....y.:.:.,-./.,:... ni . • ..............„,„.......„.„,„:„.„.„,....„„..,„.:„..........„.......„.......,„:...„...,..... :;:„...„....7.:. .. ...,„,..,..............,..„.......„.....,...„.„............,......,„.....„, .. 0,tro1 ,...,:„..„........,„......,,......„........,.....„,..4 ...1.•• .' ^—• ,..'...,.....;',....'t,‘,.....,../;%'..47.!4! ' %VALDROP ENGIN' •ING SEE SHEET#i FOR CONTINUATION ••°p' "'°"'" h Wiralti RWAeM Now M! M Mn�•II om'• FON KM t[aUNr MD MOW.sou SEC INEPT I OF► ESPLANADE:GOLF AND.COUNTRY CLUB' OF OF RPUD .. • CONCEPTOAL , MASTER PLAN. EXHIBIT"C2" I ' SHEET'2-OF 3 i UDA.reu:.2O • l U1)Z-A-P12014-099 Strike-through-test is deleted Page9 of 2.I Esplanade golf&.,Country•Club'of Naples RPUD Underline text is added L-ast'Revised:limit 27,2014 L CONCEPTUAL LAKE LOCATIONS *RIO RESIDENTIAL/GOLF `. PRESERVE RIONT-OF,WAY * LAND USE AREAS ARE CONCEPTUAL.AND SUBJECT TO RELOCATION/IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. SPECIAL NOTES: 1) WNERf APP JCKIIU ALONG PROJECT BOUNDARY AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PRESERVE AREAS SHALL SERVE AS BUFFERS. IF AFTER EXOTIC REMOVAL THE PRESERVE VEGETATION FAILS TO MEET MINIMUM CODE BUFFER STANDARDS ADDITIONAL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REQUIRED. NATIVE HABITAT SUMMARY: EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT 903.2 AC. REQUIRED NATIVE HABITAT=542.3 Ac.± PROVIDED NATIVE HABITAT (ON SITE) =542.3 As. ACREAGE SUMMARY: IA\I SECTION 22=445.5 As. t SECTION 15 on 684.6 Ae.± SECTION 10=572.2 AL It TOTAL=1,653.3 As,± TOTAL AREA OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY'= 928.8 As.± TOTAL AREA WITHIN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY=729.5 As.* �A�-®��� ENG"NEERING 0010.1711101103111142110M PIMM014iNFNM11I.N1lIIN► NINA WNW 0.7/IY N»+Manl nnNM*1*/* Mat MelpeldinwIlIMAM■ ESPLANADE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUE OF NAPLES RPUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"C2" SHEET 3 OT?3 fl L$NAME:27010130602dwi' UPDATED:20144306 Pl7DZ-A-P1.2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Page 10 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline lext is added Last Revised:June 27.2014 {-- EXHIBIT D • FOR 441114801,ESPLANADE GOLF&COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION. • si • P • P e - e : .e . , •.• • .. :. - • e • e . FbORg-Mi • • • . $• _ . _ el e _ . a .... a I 111 • I 1 a e • _ 1 we _a a .s _a _ e . , e • a 1- . . e - AND ALL OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP : e , •.• • - • e I- e , • • AND • • • • e - . ;._ a e I• • a •.• • a FLORIDA, EEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; _ 1 e • _ 1 I " • e • , • THE WEST A OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST A, THE EAST '4 OF TI • e • e . .e . .. • ,• - • . e :' --s- • e -11. • e • - • T44g4,,, 40RTRBA&T.44; ME EAST V OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, 9 • , THE EAST V2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST JA, ' zn• : a • - • e - '' - a 111- . _ I e . 1 a a _IL . e . THE WEST A OF THE EAST A OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST A OF THE EAST 1A OF THE SOUTHEAS-T%OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 2 • _ _ 1 e a• m '• a I 1 • • ' THE WEST 311 OF THE EAST A OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST A, _ I , • '1 I. a _ *.... a ... . • • • PuDz.A-PL2o14-O99 Strike-through text is deleted Page I I of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club uf Naples RPM Chiderlim text is added Last Revised:June 27,20)4 AND e _ - • e • Y_ - • a Yom' • ,. - -• .e . -. e Y • �e • 1, a r�la eh x -' a. • .9. '" - - , -e AND - a 0' .e Y' - • •1 • r' e , • . . _. , - - - , -.... .. AND a ' a .w AND r e Y ,'. .a a s `a s. • . .e. - , FLORIDAF AND • r • ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 1:0,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA', LESS AND EXCEPTING THE FOLLOW OUR(4)PARCELS: I�TIE SOUTH 1/2 QF THE NORTHEAST 1/4..OF-THE NOR'T'HWEST 1/4,. 2)THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 3 THE NORTHEAS 1/4 OF THE OU HEAST 1:/4.OF THE SO HE ST /4 4)THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1.14: AND • ALL OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PUD"L-A-1 1.20?4-499 Strike-through text Is deleted Page 12 of 21 Csplanade.Golf&.:Country Club of Naples RPUI) Underline text is`added Last Revised.June 27,2014 AND ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 22.TOWNSHIP 48.SMITH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTHEAST 1.14 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4,AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4:AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4. OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4.. THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4; THE EAST 1/2 QF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4,. THE:WEST.1/2 OF THE FAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 QF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, THE EAST 1/2 OFTHE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF.THE SOUTHWEST 1/4.. THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF 1HE,SOUTHFAST 1/4,. THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE'SOUTHEAST 114, THE WEST 1/2 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4;, THE WEST 3/4 OF THE EAST 1./2'OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4,. THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH.RANGE,26 EAST.COLLIER COUNTY;FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22;TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH;RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST'QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER.COUNTY.FLORIDA, AND THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE;NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA, AND THE WEST HALF QF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA;,. I'IIDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is.deleted Page 13 of 21 1 splanade Golf&Country Club.of Naples:RP.UD Underline text iradded Last Revised:June 27,2014 l � AND ,EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER:OF THE NORTHWEST. ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 22.TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,.FLORIDA.. AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22;TOWNSHIP: 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE .NORTH 30 FEET'THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR'HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONTAINING 1658.3 ACRES.MORE OR LESS. { PUDZ-A-PL2014-099 Strike-through text is defied: Page 14 pf 21 Esplanade.cml1':&Country C1011 Of Naples RPM) Uiderllne.tezr is added Last Revised;June 27,20.14 EXHIBIT E :.FOR. #41L-ESPLANADE GOLF&COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RP.UD DEVIATIONS 1.. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.0, which requires cul-de-sacs and local streets to have a minimum sixty (60) right-of-way width and'Iwo (2) ten foot (10') wide travel lanes, to allow a minimum right-of-way width of40'for private local streets and 50'for private spine roads. 2. Deviation: #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6:06.01:.. Street System Requirements,.to allow cul- de-sacs in excess of 1,000' in length. For any ctil-de-sac.exceeding 1;600 feet in length, the roadway must include at approximately 1,600 feet intervals design features which provide for the ability of emergency vehicles to turn around. Traffic roundabouts, eyebrows, hammerheads or similar design features shall be allowed. • 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC.Section 6.06.01.Q. Street System Requirements,which _requires that street name markers shall be approved by the County Manager or designee for private streets or in conformance with U.S,D.O.T.F,I-I.W.A. This requirement shall be waived. However; breakaway posts shall be used. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6:06.01.8. Street Requirements, which requires that street pavement striping and reflective edging of public 'roadway markings shall be provided by the developer.as required by the U,S.D.O.T.F:H.W.A: This requirement shall be waived for private roadways. Traffic circulation signage shall:be in:Conformance with Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device standards: 5. Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.0504.1H;which requires 1 parking space per 200 square. feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/clubhouse/lounge/snack .baddining/ineeti:ng room associated with golf courses: The requested deviation is to allow for 3 parking spaces per 1,000:.square-feet of office/lobby/pro shop/health club/clubhouse/lounge/snack bar/dining/meeting room associated with the proposed golf course. Parking spaces for golf course holes, exterior recreation uses, and•maintenance buildings will be provided per the.LDC; 6. Deviation.#6 seeks relief from LDC'Section;4.06.04.A, which limits the developer to. 100 acres of residential, commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUP.The requested deviation is to allow the developer to clear up to 3.00 acres of residential, 'commercial, or industrial lots or building sites to store excess fill generated by lake excavations within the PUD or project where the excavation is taking„place.This is not a deviation from the Collier County Excavation.Ordinan.ce. 7. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.00.02.c,•which permits a maximum.wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts.The requested deviation is to allow a maximum wall height of8"throughout the development: Where abutting an existing or. future:public: roadway, a 20' tall wall, berm, or combination wall/berm is permitted. PUDZ A-P1,2014-099 Strike-through text is dekrted Page 15 of 21 Esplanade Golf dc.Country'Clu b of Naples.RPUI) Under line text Is added. Last Revised:June 27.2014 8. Deviation #8 seeks relief from:LDC Section 5.04.04.8.5,which permits a maximum of five(5)model homes, or'a number corresponding to ten (10)percent of the total number of platted lots,whichever is less, per platted approved development:prior to final plat approval,The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of six (6) model homes per development tract; not to exceed forty(40) model homes within the overall RPU:D. As part of the application material for every building permit for a model home, the developer shall provide documentation stating how many model homes are in existence so. that the maximum of forty(40)model homes is not exceeded. 9. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.0406.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height.The requested deviation is to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a Maximum of 8 feet in height.The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. 10. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 5:05.02 3.2.,which permits one(1)real estate pole sign per street frontage that is setback a minimum of 10' from any property line.The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of two (2) real estate pole signs per street frontage setback a minimum of.5' from the property line along lmmokalee.Road only. 11. Deviation #11 seeks relief from LDC .Section 5:06,02:8:5, which:requires on-premise directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from internal property lines:The requested deviation is to allow for on-premise direction signage to be setback:a minimum of 5' from internal property lines.. This. deviation does not apply to property adjacent to public roadways: 12. Deviation #12 seeks relief from LDC Section.5.,06.02.B..6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8' and.total sign Area of 64 s.f,per sign. The. requested deviation is to allow for two (2) ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10'and total sign area of 80 s.f..per sign. 13..Deviation#13 seeks relief from LOC.Section 5,06.02:B:6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development. The requested deviation is to allow for one:(l) ground.sign at the property corners fronting on existing and proposed public roadways that provide access to the project, in addition to two (2) ground signs.at each project.entrance. The proposed ground signs at property corners, commonly referred to as"boundary markers",will be permitted at.a maximum height of 10" and sign area..of 32 s.f.per sign. 14. Deviation #14 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02A,which requires sidewalks on both sides of roadways internal to the site.:The requested deviation is to allow for an 8' wide.sidewalk on one side of the private spine road as shown on the MD master plan,and 5' wide sidewalks on one side of all other private, local roadways internal to the development that service residential units on one(1) side of the roadway,and/or terminate in a cul=de-sac,up to a::maximum length of 2,.5001:1. PIIi)Z-A-I 1:2019.049 Strike-through text is deleted Page 16 of 21 Esplanade Calf&Country Club or Naples RPM) Underline texrts added Last Revisedt June.27,2014 15. Deviation #15 seeks relief from LDC Section 10.02.04.0 which limits the developer to one (1) Site Development Plan submittal for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the first staff review Comments. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum or three (3) Site Development Plan submittals for concurrent review with the final plat at such time as the applicant submits the response to the staff review corrnents. PUDZ-A-P1.2014-099 Strike-through text a deleted Page 17 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples ItPLID Underline text is added Last Revised June 27,2014 EXIIIBIT F FOR }1RASOLL ESPLANADE GOLF&COUNTRY CLUB OF NAPLES RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Regulations for development of the Mirasel;Esplanade ow&Country Club.of Naples RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order in which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC.that are otherwise applicable shall apply. A. RPUD MASTER FLAN ]. Exhibit "C2", the.RPUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries, shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent. approval phase such as platting or site development plan application,. Subject to the provisions of:Section 10.02.13 of the LDC, RPUD amendments may be made from time to time. • B. TRANSPORTATION 1. Upon the County's: adoption:of a CR-951 extension corridor alignment, and.within.180 days of the County's-request, the Owner, its successors or assigns,:shall dedicate to. County fee simple right=of-way for the roadway and drainage system at tlle°agreed.upon appraised value per acre, for those areas located outside the limits of the residential/Golf Course areas depicted as"R/G"on the PUD master plan Until such time that the right-of-way is dedicated to the County, the Owner may utilize the land for temporary uses during construction as set forth in LDC §5:04:03 Upon recordation of the deed or other conveyance instrument in the public records of Collier County for the dedication of the right-of-way, the Developer shall become eligible for Transportation Impact fee credits in accordance with the consolidated impact. fee Ordinance in effect at the time of recordation of the dedication. If the project is built out or has prepaid transportation Impact tees to be assessed for the project,then the Developer or its successors or assigns shall be eligible to request cash reimbursement. The Developer shall not be responsible to:obtain:or modify any permits on behalf of the County related to the extension of CR-951, 2. The Developer shall -construct a 10' multi-use pathway to be located along the Immokalee Road right-of-way on the North side of the.Cocohatchee Canal as a part of the entrance construction. Completion of construction of the pathway shall be completed concurrently with the vehicular connection to the existing bridge over the Cocohatchee Canal: I'UDZ-A-P1.2014-099 Strike-through text is deleted Pate 1 S.of 21 Esplanade Gotf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is Added Last Revised:June 27,2014 .. •- - ,. ';. S. s° s p si - ►� 43. The Developer,its successors, or assigns, agree that at the time of issuance of a building permit for the.400th residential dwelling unit authorized by this PUT);;or commencement of construction of the intersection improvements, the Developer, or its successors or assigns, shall be responsible for their respective fair share of the North leg of the CR- 951/Broken Back Road intersection with Immokalee. Road, which includes modification, replacement, or relocation of the at-grade. bridge crossing the Cocohatchee Canal. 5-:4. The development shall be limited to a maximum ofd 823 Two Way,unadjusted PM Peak hour trips. 4 5 The Developer may use the eastern entrance.from Broken l3ack Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan for."construction-only traffic upon issuance of a County road right-of-way permit for temporary access. Developer.shall be required to install a stabilized road base and provide for dust abatement measures for the construction traffic'. 71.6. At the time that.Developer applies for a road right-way-permit for a permanent eastern entrance from Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard as shown on the master plan, Developer shall construct at its cost the two northbound lanes of a future four lane road design of Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) from the Quarry's north entrance(alternatively,from its terminus thatmay be north of the Quarry's entrance as a result of road construction by others for their site specific access needs) to the Mifasol Esplanade Golf & Country Club of Naples project's eastern entrance The roadway shall be constructed in accordance with the design.standards including drainage features and sidewalks of.a two-lane collector roadway'as required by the Collier County LDC and:.Code of Laws and Ordinances:.at the time of issuance of the road right of way Pe The Developer. will be required. to construct only those site access. improvements such as turn lanes along Broken Back.Road/Collier.Boulevard.(CR-951) that are specific to the Mi-rasol Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples project. In the event the County at time of. issuance of the road right of way permit requests improvements .to Broken Back Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-951) that exceed the collector standards:of the LDC and Code of Laws and Ordinances,,then Developer shall be eligible for .impact fee credits for those additional improvements, The County will accept'the roadway by Resolution for ownership and.inaintenance:.one (1.) year after acceptance of.the construction of.the..roadway; The..Developer shall not be required as part of thisPUD-to provide for offsite treatment and storage of stomasvater for Broken Back:.Road/Collier Boulevard (CR-9$.1)outside of the County's road right of way; The stormwater`is planned to be conveyed to the Quarry`for storage/treatment or to another off-site location as directed by Collier:County. PUD%-A-P1 2014-099 Strike-through ter is deleted Page 19 of 2 l Esplanade Golf&C.ountty Club of Naples RPUD Underline:text L added Last Revised:June 27,2014 C. ENVIRONMENTAL The project shall retain a minimum of 537.4 5423 acres of native, vegetation on-site in compliance with the Growth Management Plan, Easements or ROW created for access to outparcels within the preserve or for future extension of the CR-951 corridor shall not cause the preserve to fall below the minimum native vegetation retention requirement. D.• EXCAVATION Excavation.aCtivities'shall comply with,the definition of a commercial or development excavation pursuant to Section 22-106 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County Florida. The entire water management pass-thru will be constructed at one time as per South Florida Water Management permit#11-02031-P, as amended, prior to the residential development under an administratively issued "development" excavation permit as long as no more than 20,000 c.y. of material is removed off-site. As per Section 22-106 of Code of Laws and Ordinances, a commercial excavation permit will be required for removing more than the approved 20,000 e.y. of material off-site. E. OUTPARCEL IN SECTION 10 A temporary access easement shall,be granted by the Owner to the owner of parcel number of 00178760007, at a location specified by IM Collier Joint Venture it's successors and assigns. At such time that the northern portion of the Mifasel-Esplanade Golf& Country Club of Naples RPUD has access to a public road, the developer shall provide rea.sortable access from the parcel number 00178760007 across the Miritsel Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD to the public road. Both the temporary and permanent easements shall be granted to the owner of this parcel, at no cost TO the County or the owner of this outparcel. F. UTILITIES 1. The developer shall connect to the Collier County Water Sewer District(CCWSD)potable water system at a locations determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a locations determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 3. The developer shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a locations to be determined by-cCWS1).when capacity is available. G. PLANNING L. The developer shall complete construction of the golf course and, temporary golf pro shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 100' dwelling unit The developer shall complete construction of the permanent golf prz shop/locker room prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the—5W dwelling-unit-50% of the approved units,or 616 units. RUN-API 2014.099 Strike-thtpuh feXt is deleted Page 20 of 21 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPI.J1) Underline text is added Last Revised:Anse 27,2014 2, The 112 dwelling units added to the Esplanade Golf & Country: Club of Naples RPUD through this PUD amendment: approval dated 2014 must be developed within the 19.7-acre parcel to the oast ofprivate spine road in.Section 22 (Parcel No. 00127360003). H. PUD MONITORING One' entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUT) monitoring until close-out of the PUT), and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this KID amendment approval dated 2014, the Managing Entity is Taylor Morrison Esplanade Naples. LLC, Should.the•Managing Entity desire to transfer. the monitoring and commitments to Astccessor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the M4naiOlg Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the.Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to com,1 with the Commitments hrou.h the Mana.in. Entit but the Manajn Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and, fulfillment of PUT) commitments. 131,107.-A-11/014-099 Strike-through leal is deleted Page2 I 0121 Esplanade Golf&Country Club of Naples RPUD Underline text is added Last Revised:June 2'7,2014