Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CCPC Agenda 08/07/2014 R
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 7, 2014 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, AUGUST 7, 2014, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—July 17,2014 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS— 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A. PUDZ-PL20120001981: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural District (A) and Rural Agricultural District within a Special Treatment Overlay (A-ST)to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD)zoning district for the project known as RMC-Enclave MPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 114 single family or multi-family dwelling units or up to 350 group housing units for seniors on property located in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 28.38±acres;and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Kay Deselem,AICP,Principal Planner] 1 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Note: This item has been continued from the July 17,2014 CCPC meeting: A. PL20110002626/ CPSS-2012-1: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series by establishing the Everglades-Randall Subdistrict to allow a maximum of 20,000 square feet of church/place of worship and related uses, excluding church related day-care use. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard in Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, consisting of 7.80 acres; and furthermore, recommending transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion to CU-PL20 1 1 00026 1 5.) [Coordinator:Michele Mosca,AICP,Principal Planner] Note: This item has been continued from the July 17,2014 CCPC meeting: B. CU-PL20110002615: Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County,Florida,providing for the establishment of a Conditional Use to allow a church within an Estates zoning district pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.I of the Collier County Land Development Code for property located on the northwest corner at the intersection of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard in Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1 Small Scale GMPA)[Coordinator:Nancy Gundlach,AICP, Principal Planner] Note: This item has been continued from the July 17,2014 CCPC meeting: C. PUDZ-PL20130000682: Willow Run RPUD,An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural Zoning District(A), a Rural Agricultural Zoning District with an ST Overlay (A-ST), a Rural Agricultural Zoning District with a Rural Fringe Mixed Use Sending Lands Overlay and Natural Resource Protection Overlay(A-RFMUD-NRPA),and an Agricultural Zoning District with a Rural Fringe Mixed Use Sending Lands Overlay and Special Treatment Overlay and Natural Resource Protection Area Overlay (A-RFMUD-ST-NRPA) to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) Zoning District to allow up to 590 dwelling units for a project to be known as the Willow Run RPUD on property located at 9220 Collier Boulevard in Sections 11, 12, 13 and 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida consisting of 559±acres;and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Kay Deselem,AICP, Principal Planner] 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp 2 Clerk of Court COLLIER COUNTY SMALL SCALE ADOPTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Project: GMPA-PL20 1 1 0002626 Petition: CPSS-2012-1 0 10 11 12 7 < 8 9 w J D O C v p 0: w j 15 U 14 13 18 17 16 D 0< O p > CO ct OIL WELL ROAD C.R.858 w --- w z w QJQ Y 23 24 O g 22 Ci 19 20 21 PROJECT LOCATION 2 RANDALL BOULEVARD 27 26 25 30 29 28 CCPC: August 07, 2014 [continued from July 17, 2014] BCC: September 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC - Project: PL20110002626/Petition: CPSS-2012-1 Small Scale Growth Management Plan (GMP)Adoption Amendment July 17. 2013 Agenda 1) TAB: CPSS-2012-1 Staff Report. DOCUMENT: Adoption CCPC Staff Report 2) TAB: Ordinance. DOCUMENTS: Adoption Ordinance&Exhibit"A" Text&Map Changes 3) TAB: Legal Advertising. DOCUMENT: CCPC Adoption Advertising 4) TAB: Project/Petition DOCUMENTS: Project/Petition: PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1 5) TAB: Staff Correspondence DOCUMENTS: Correspondence from Staff CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church Co*fr. -r Covinty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULATION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: July 17, 2014 RE: PETITION NO. PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1, EVERGLADES-RANDALL SUBDISTRICT— GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) [COMPANION TO PETITION CU-PL20110002615] AGENTS/APPLICANT/OWNER: Agent: R. Bruce Anderson, Esq. Roetzel &Andress Law Firm 850 Park Shore Drive, Third Floor Naples, Florida 34104 Owner: Corp. of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 50 e. North Temples St., 22nd Floor Salt Lake City, UT 84150 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site contains approximately 7.80 acres and is located at the northwest corner of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, in Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida (Refer to the aerial map on page 2 for the general project location). - 1 - CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church d r_ - .�! Pa -. 4 .1..,---,,, -.t A`t 4 �`- :f.%.A°!fi i ir a_.3.- • .,-"Irg ,.., .c..1 ,-, .0:- _ _ - - ..44,. t --,. .ik }' t 3,_ii - .+ '- t `-;- 4" 4:-.::.-• A }'y s v ,;� 4`,1t a ,3,• kl,'C't-.4_`,S . 4 ,,, 4 ', s s� i :f,-fir r *'!'� ,, '-fi x I .- sr- - ?41.,,!n .,. y e, , i • Ate° �. I� w a; yN ,'�{s�.G'fa. d xp, `�F r 'J,��.R'1J JE C. -"° 1 t` �1 *-t '' '�.a j.-r i ��.ls'�f-It"'`� `*�[JP' ''r" ,c.'..-4 I i -• i°`4, -kc 4 f .1 1 r~.`4 b 0 °ig�p'. t ,n *It t' 1` 1 t Gam., ' ,R.p1.. ��kS-.�' ` y .i �yg °" t.. b ,Q C .,Z 24°a t F .4 '� , 4t yt� Slit 1-AgerA� jj 1 of ,L b Y! A S i -._ ...,437 t IVY_' -s,N7,!,',..-A **-$1.- -'- • ' - - s- - ' '4 . ' I* - ' - ' "4---. - - - — = 4- -' - - , - - - . iv .._ :,..,1,- ,,_,. .. . , '4 ,-. .-- Ti -* - ' ''' ' - ' .. ' ink • ''',_, ' r' .11t:''4, 47/, '"Z.'tf"4. 71:c't,-.' -1' '''''Irt- „mi.,-,,,,,,v.,\ „. .,... ., - "4—': ..t REQUESTED ACTION: This petitioner seeks to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) text, Future Land Use Map and Map Series by: 1. Amending the Estates — Mixed Use District, to add the Everglades-Randall Subdistrict, consisting of Tract 115 and the east 150 feet of Tract 116, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 69; 2. Amending the Future Land Use Map to add the new Subdistrict; and 3. Creating a new Future Land Use Map series map to depict the new Subdistrict to be titled, "Everglades-Randall Subdistrict." The petitioner's proposed text changes, shown in strike-through/underline format (words underlined are added, words struck through are deleted.), are as follows [This text is reflected in the Resolution Exhibit A; staff-recommended alternative text is located at the end of this Report.]: Proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element Text and Map Amendment: 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION A. Estates-Mixed Use District -2- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church 6. Everglades - Randall Subdistrict [Page 30] The Everglades-Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard and consists of 7.8 acres on Tract 115 and the east 150 ft. of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and related uses. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. A 75 ft. buffer shall be provided along the northern and western boundaries of the property within which a septic tank drain field and water management facilities are permitted. 65 feet shall consist of native vegetation materials from the three vegetative strata to serve as a transitional area between the church and the adjacent residential tracts. The buffer shall have an opacity of 80 percent at time of planting and an opacity of 100 percent within one year. Minimum yard requirements are for a corner lot and measured with two front setbacks and two side yard setbacks. One front yard setback will be 75 feet, the other front setback may be reduced to 37.5 feet. Side yards shall be a minimum of 75 feet. A minimum of a 10 feet wide Type B landscape buffer with native vegetation shall be provided along the parking edges. Water management areas shall not be located in this buffer. A minimum of 15 feet wide Type D buffers shall be provided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. The parking lot shall provide for: (a) A maximum of 155 parking spaces, with 15 percent in grass parking (b) The throat depth of the access drives shall be 30 feet measured from the roadway edge of pavement Project Description: The petitioner is requesting the approval of a new Subdistrict on ±7.80 acres to allow a church/place of worship and related uses, not including church related day care use. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION: Existing Conditions: The subject request includes 2 Tracts within Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates: • Tract 115 is approximately 5.46 acres and undeveloped; zoned E, Estates; and, designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the GGAMP Future Land Use Map. • East 150 feet of Tract 116 is approximately 2.34 acres and undeveloped; zoned E, Estates; and, designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the GGAMP Future Land Use Map. -3- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church Surrounding Land Uses: North: Developed with a single-family home; zoned E, Estates; and, designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the GGAMP Future Land Use Map. South: Across Randall Boulevard, single family homes and undeveloped tracts; zoned E, Estates; and, designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the GGAMP Future Land Use Map. East: Across Everglades Boulevard, single family homes and undeveloped tracts; zoned E, Estates; and, designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the GGAMP Future Land Use Map. West: Developed with a single-family home; zoned E, Estates; and, designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the GGAMP Future Land Use Map. In summary, the existing and planned land uses in the immediate area surrounding the subject property are limited to residential land uses. STAFF ANALYSIS Appropriateness of Change If approved as submitted, this proposed Growth Management Plan amendment would allow a church/place of worship and related uses in an area designated for low density residential development. An evaluation of the project site and surrounding area, the applicant's needs assessment, development impacts, infrastructure demands, and other considerations, has been made to determine the appropriateness of this proposed change. Background and Considerations Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) — The Golden Gate Area Master Plan contains locational criteria limiting conditional use development in the Estates designation as follows. GGAMP— 1991: • Conditional use development, except essential services, was limited to Estates Neighborhood Centers, infill development on Golden Gate Parkway and on the west side of C.R. 951, and transitional areas — adjacent to certain non-residential uses. GGAMP Re-study Committee (formed in year 2002)— GGAMP Policy 5.2.3 and revisions to the Estates, Conditional Uses Subdistrict: • The GGAMP Re-study Committee was formed, in part, to study the land use needs of the Golden Gate Community, such as commercial, community facility and institutional uses. County staff worked with the Committee to identify appropriate areas to locate new commercial development and conditional uses within the Estates and Golden Gate City. Committee recommendations to the BCC included added provisions for conditional use development, expansion and creation of Neighborhood Centers within the Estates, and the expansion and creation of commercial/mixed-use subdistricts within Golden Gate City. -4- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church Committee recommendations for expanded commercial and conditional use opportunities and the restriction of these uses in certain areas governed by the Master Plan were adopted by the BCC in 2003 and 2004, as part of the Phased Re-study Amendments to the GGAMP. The subject property was not identified as an area appropriate for Conditional Uses or as an area in which there was a particular need for Conditional Uses. GGAMP— Present • Conditional use development, except essential services and model homes, is limited to Estates Neighborhood Centers; infill development on the west side of C.R. 951; transitional areas — adjacent to certain non-residential uses or adjacent to Neighborhood Centers; and, five site- specific locations — one on the west side of C.R. 951, one on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, one on the south side of Immokalee Road, one on the west side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, and one on the south side of Oil Well Road (C.R. 858). Justification, Conditional Use Analysis and Compatibility: • Justification The petitioner's stated justification for the proposed amendment is that: (1) The proposed site meets the church's needs criteria as follows: (a) located within Golden Gate Estates, (b) centrally located to its membership, (c) cost acceptable to the church, and, (d) accessible; (2) Proposed church use is compatible with the neighborhood; (3) Proposed site will be located on a future 4-lane roadway (Everglades Blvd.) and a 6-lane roadway (Randall Blvd.), thereby making the site undesirable for residential development; and, (4) Conditional Use sites [allowed by the GGAMP] for the proposed church use are not available (not listed for sale or developed) within Golden Gate Estates. • Conditional Use Analysis: The firm of JR Evans Engineering analyzed potential Neighborhood Center properties, Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use sites and Transitional Conditional Use sites for a church/place of worship within the Golden Gate Estates designated area. The Conditional Use analysis included a statement that twenty parcels within the Neighborhood Centers would allow conditional uses, but that those properties along with potential Transitional Conditional Use sites were either not listed for sale or developed. Staff requested detailed documentation regarding these parcels, but the applicant did not provide them. The above analysis did not include lands outside of the Estates designation that potentially meets the Church's other needs criteria, i.e. agricultural lands (the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District along the Immokalee Rd. corridor) or the Rural Settlement Area (Orange Tree and Orange Blossom Ranch PUDs), as requested by staff during the sufficiency review of the petition (refer to Map Exhibit 4A — Membership Location Map, and Correspondence Tab — Memoranda dated November 16, 2012 and August 22, 2013). The applicant stated in their submittal materials that, "the need to remain in Golden Gate Estates and proximate to members was a primary factor in the Church's continuing search for a suitable parcel in Golden Gate Estates." Within Golden Gate Estates east of C.R. 951, areas eligible for conditional use development include: Neighborhood Centers: These Centers are located along major roadways and are distributed within Golden Gate Estates according to commercial demand estimates. These centers are designed to concentrate all new commercial zoning, and conditional uses, as allowed in the Estates Zoning District, in locations where traffic impacts can be readily accommodated and to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial and conditional use development. East of C.R. 951, there are three Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections of Golden Gate - 5- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the NW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, and Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Sites: Parcels immediately adjacent to commercial zoning within the Neighborhood Centers located at the intersections of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (excluding the SW quadrant), Golden Gate Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard, and Everglades Boulevard and Immokalee Road are eligible for Conditional Uses under this provision of the GGAMP. Transitional Conditional Use Sites: Conditional uses may be granted in Transitional Areas. A Transitional Area is defined as an area located between certain existing non-residential uses (e.g. fire station) and residential uses. The purpose of this provision is to allow conditional uses in areas that are adjacent to certain existing non-residential uses and are therefore generally not appropriate for residential use. The conditional use will act as a transition (buffer) between these non-residential and residential uses. Historically, Estates' residents have expressed concerns about lack of controls for the location of conditional uses within the Estates. Policies to regulate the location of conditional use sites were adopted into the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in 1991 and conditional use locational criteria were revisited as part of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy in the early 2000s. The GGAMP continues to control the location of these conditional uses. Based on the applicant's assertion that there are no eligible conditional use sites available within the Estates for the proposed church development, it would serve the interests of the Golden Gate Estates community to reevaluate the Golden Gate Area Master Plan as part of a comprehensive study to determine the demand for additional conditional use sites to accommodate existing and future needs of the residents within the Estates. In addition to demand, the study should evaluate changed conditions (e.g. road network changes) and should reflect community desires regarding conditional use sites: what, if any, additional locations; what size (acreage) for any such sites; what use intensity (building sq. ft., uses allowed, etc.); what development standards (building height and mass, setbacks, landscaping, buffers, architectural standards, parking allowances, etc.). It is staffs position that the case-by-case approval of new conditional use sites without the input of the community through a comprehensive approach could potentially result in disorganized patterns of development, inconsistent site design, and loss of community vision for the existing and future development of the Estates. • Compatibility Roads: The proposed site is located at the intersection of two rural, 2-lane roads— Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard. The 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan indicates that Randall Boulevard will need to be expanded to 6 lanes and Everglades Boulevard to 4 lanes. An assertion of the petitioner's is that the site is undesirable for residential development because it will front on a future 6-lane road and 4-lane road [referenced in the 2035 LRTP]. If this assertion is accepted prior to these potential road expansions, what does this mean for the other Golden Gate Estates parcels fronting on these two roads, and other existing and planned 4-lane and 6-lane road segments, such as Immokalee Road, Golden Gate Parkway, Oil Well Road, etc.? The proposed conditional use at the subject location may be warranted years from now with the changed road conditions (referenced in the 2035 LRTP), but it does not presently appear to be warranted based on existing conditions in the area. - 6- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church Church/Place of Worship: The proposed church/place of worship would require conditional use approval within all residential and agricultural zoning districts in Collier County. However, the Estates designation in the GGAMP further limits conditional use development to certain locations. Conditional uses are those land uses which are generally compatible with the permitted land uses in a zoning district, but which require site-specific review of their location, design, intensity, configuration, and operating characteristics, and which may require the imposition of appropriate conditions in order to ensure compatibility of the use at a particular location. Conditional uses allowed in the E, Estates zoning district — subject to consistency with the GGAMP, are: church; social and fraternal organizations; child care center and adult day care center; private school; and group care facility. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) has specific Goals, Objectives and Policies to guide the development of non-residential uses in the Estates designation, such as the proposed conditional use for a church. Throughout the GGAMP, the importance of balancing the needs of the community while maintaining the rural characteristics of the Estates is recognized. For this reason, locational criteria have been established to control the development of these non-residential uses. This GMP amendment petition has two companion petitions — a conditional use and site development plan (SDP). The submitted SDP for the proposed 20,000 square feet church, including up to 230 seats, and up to 155 parking spaces on approximately 7.80 acres appears typical of a church located within an urban setting. The architecture, scale of the building, amount and type of landscaping proposed along the road corridors, building setbacks, and number of parking spaces may not be representative of the Estates residents'vision of rural design/character for the area. To address potential incompatibility with nearby residential development and the desired character of the Estates, changes can be made to the proposed amendment text. These might include: limit building size and/or height; increase landscape buffer size and change plant composition; limit parking to that allowed by the Land Development Code; impose operational limitations, e.g. days or hours of use; limit or prohibit related uses, e.g. soup kitchen; etc. Environmental Impacts: In accordance with Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and Section 3.05.07 of the Land Development Code (LDC), 15 percent of the native vegetation is required to be retained on-site if developed as a church/place of worship. Single-family homes, as currently allowed on the property, are exempt from the requirement for retention of native vegetation. Floodplain compensation areas may be planted with native vegetation in accordance with the criteria in the LDC to help meet the native vegetation retention requirement. Surveying for listed species was conducted from November 2011 to January 2013, with approximately 15 hours devoted to the wildlife survey. No listed species or evidence of listed species was observed on the project site. Given the location and altered hydrology of the site, the property would likely offer, at best, limited utilization for foraging birds and transient species. Base on these findings, the subject proposal may be deemed consistent with the applicable provisions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Historical and Archaeological Impacts: Historic, archaeological or other cultural resources have not been identified as being present on the subject property, based on a review of the Florida Master Site File by the Division of Historical Resources of the Florida Department of State. The Master Site File is the State of Florida's official inventory of historical and cultural resources. The project will be subject to the accidental discovery of archaeological - 7- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church or historical sites, as required by Policy 11.1.3. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and Section 2.03.07 E of the Land Development Code. Public Facilities Impacts: The petitioner prepared public facilities calculations, which were submitted with this petition and are summarized below. • Water and Wastewater: The subject property is not located within the Collier County Water and Sewer District boundary and is not part of any other existing utilities district. Development of the property will require installation of a potable well and septic treatment system, permitted consistent with the applicable provisions of the GMP, LDC and other jurisdictional agencies including FDEP and the SFWMD. Additionally, the proposed project site is located within a groundwater protection special treatment overlay zone (ST/WS-4) of the East Golden Gate Wellfield for the City of Naples; compliance with all rules and regulations to protect the wellfield will be required pursuant to LDC Section 3.06.00 — Groundwater Protection. All well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this project will need to be shown on all future development plans. Potable Water Demand: Proposed use — church/place of worship is approximately 759 gpd based on 230 seats. Sanitary Sewer Demand: Proposed use — church/place of worship is approximately 690 gpd based on 230 seats. • Solid Waste: The project will be served by Collier County Solid Waste Management. According to the applicant, the county has sufficient capacity to accommodate the project. • Drainage: The proposed project will be required to comply with the SFWMD and County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of storm water events by both on-site and off-site improvements. • Transportation: The roadway network adjacent to the subject site has sufficient capacity to accommodate this proposed project within the 5-year planning period, and as such can be deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. • Schools, Libraries, Parks and Recreational Facilities: The application does not propose an increase in residential density; therefore, no additional demand for services is anticipated. • EMS, Fire, and Police: The subject project is located within the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District. The nearest fire station and EMS services are located approximately 4 miles from the site, and the sheriff substation is located approximately 3.5 miles from the site on Oil Well Road. - 8- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by Land Development Code Section 10.03.05 F was [duly advertised, noticed and] held at 5:30 p.m. on March 31, 2014, at the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District, located at 13250 Immokalee Road. One member of the public, the applicant's team, and County staff attended the NIM, and heard the following information: Bruce Anderson, the applicant's agent, provided an overview of the proposed development. The public speaker's question is noted in italicized text, followed by the agent's [Bruce Anderson's] response in bold text. Question. How quick can you get this under construction because we need more services like churches in the Estates? Response. Construction will begin as soon as all permits are obtained; we anticipate by the end of the year. The agent closed the meeting at 5:50 p.m. [Synopsis prepared by Roetzel and Andress, LPAJ FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The following are findings and conclusions resulting from the review and evaluation of this GMPA request: • As a result of this amendment, there are no significant impacts to public facilities, as defined in the Capital Improvement Element, with respect to Transportation, Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste facilities. • The subject property is located at the intersection of two rural, 2-lane roadways with a flashing 4- way stop signal — Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. • Conditional uses, such as a church use, are generally compatible with residential properties, provided certain conditions are imposed to mitigate impacts. • Conditional use development on the subject site has the potential to provide a transition from a future (refer to 2035 LRTP) busy intersection to the adjacent low-density residential properties. • Approval of this petition may lead to other requests for non-transitional, non-residential uses, within the other three quadrants of the subject intersection, and other similarly situated properties in Golden Gate Estates. • Approval of this petition based on the future 6-laning of Randall Boulevard and 4-laning of Everglades Boulevard may set an undesirable precedent for other major intersections and/or road corridors within Golden Gate Estates. • The data and analysis provided to establish the need for the subject Conditional Use site (e.g. inventory of available Conditional Use sites in Golden Gate Estates and proximate to GGE) and the appropriateness of this site (e.g. compatibility analysis, impact upon other properties to possibly seek similar exception to locational criteria) has not been demonstrated. - 9- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church • Designation of the subject property for a Conditional Use cannot be supported by the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. • A re-study of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan is needed. Staff finds that the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment does not support the proposed request to establish a new Conditional Use site. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on June 27, 2014. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSS-2012-1, as submitted, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation not to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. However, IF the CCPC should determine that this petition, as submitted, provides appropriate data and analysis that warrant a recommendation to approve (adopt), staff recommends modifications to the proposed Subdistrict language as shown below (to address compatibility; rural characteristics; and proper format, e.g. code language and organization). (Note: single underline text is added, as proposed by petitioner; double underline text is added, and double ekr=i44e=t4rough text is deleted, as proposed by staff.) A. Estates - Mixed Use District 6. Everglades - Randall Subdistrict [Page 30] The Everglades-Randall Subdistrict is located on the northwest corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard, owl consists of 7.8 acres, and com arises OA Tract 115 and the east 150 €6 feet of Tract 116 Unit 69 Golden Gate Estates. The •ur•ose of this Subdistrict is to •rovide for churches and other 'laces of worshi• and their related uses. _---_-_-- - _--_ - -- -_---- The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: (a) Churches and other places of worship The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: (a) Day care centers (b) Private schools (c) Soup kitchens (d) Homeless shelters The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet, including no more than 230 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. ` ==_ = -- -=_-__===_ =---= t=-_,t t t A 75 f 65 feet wide buffer shall be provided along the northern and western boundaries of the property••• a septic tank drain field and water management facilities are permitted within this buffer area. Exce•t for a septic tank drain field area this 65 feet buffer area shall: consist of - 10- CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church native vegetation materials from the three vegetative strata:; _=-.. __----=_ -_-_ ----_-- - _ _=----= =---- ---- _= Th.-. ..h.,ll have an opacity of 80 sercent at time of alantina,i reach 100 •ercent o•acit within one ear: and. be maintained in .er.etuit at 100 •ercent o•acit . A minimum of a 10 feet wide Type B landscape buffer, with consisting of native vegetation only, shall be provided ake4944 adjacent to the parking lot facing the north and west property lines mss. Water management areas and the septic tank drain field shall not be located in this buffer. A 20-feet wide landscape buffer shall be srovided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. This buffer shall contain two staasered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center and a double row hedge at least 24-inches in height at the time of •lantin• and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one ear. A minimum of 50% of the 20-foot wide buffer area shall be com s rised of a meanderin• bed of shrubs and around cover other than •rass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 20-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement: other existina native vegetation shall be retained where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. The front yard setback along Everglades Boulevard shall be no less than 114 feet measured from the existin•_.ro•ert line' and the front and setback along Randall Boulevard shall be no less than 165 feet measured from the existing property line. No site-related im•rovements other than drivewa s for ingress/e•ress shall be located within 76.5 feet of the existing •ro•ert line on Everglades Boulevard and within 90 feet of the existing aro•ert line on Randall Boulevard — excest that sidewalks ma be located between 66.5 feet and 76.5 feet from the existing property line along Everglades Boulevard and between 80 feet and 90 feet from the existing property line along Randall Boulevard. Tho a,-k' lot hall p ide for: v-p ari rrr=rg=t8--" �e�o�f��r-FBA A maximum of u• to 99 aarkin• s•aces are allowed- no fewer than 15 •ercent of the s•aces shall be grass parking (b.) Tho For access drives, a throat death of no less than 30 feet, measured from the roadway edge of pavement, shall be provided. - 11 - CPSS-2012-1, Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.B. for the LDS Church PREPARED BY: DATE: 6 z - `q e e R. Mosca P, Principal Planner comprehensive arming Section Planning and Zoning Department REVIEWED BY: DATE: David Weeks,AICP, GMP Manager Comprehensive Planning Section Planning and Zoning Department REVIEWED BY: �i� '/ DATE: G-L7-IV Michael Bosi,AICP, Director Planning and Zoning Department Growth Management Division APPROVED BY: DATE: 2-79- Nick Casalanguida,A•jPstrator Growth Management Division PETITION NO. PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1 NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the September 23, 2014 BCC Meeting. - 12- ORDINANCE NO. 14- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY ESTABLISHING THE EVERGLADES-RANDALL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF CHURCH/PLACE OF WORSHIP AND RELATED USES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANDALL BOULEVARD AND EVERGLADES BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 19, 20, 29 AND 30 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, CONSISTING OF 7.80 ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. IPL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints requested an amendment to the Growth Management Plan to establish the Everglades-Randall Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or an area of critical economic concern; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on July 17, 2014 considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan and recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and PL20 1 1 0002626/CPSS-2011-I/GMP Amendment for Church of LDS Page 1 of 3 Small Scale Amendment—Rev.6/25/14 Words underlined are added;words straek-threugh have been deleted; * * * indicates break in pages WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan on September 23, 2014; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Future Land Use Map and Map Series in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the state land planning agency. PL20110002626/CPSS-201 l-1/GMP Amendment for Church of LDS Page 2 of 3 Small Scale Amendment—Rev.6/25/14 Words underlined are added;words struck-tla:eugh have been deleted; * * * indicates break in pages PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2014. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman Approved as to form and Legality: �L_.v.. \tom\ Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Proposed Text Amendment& Map Amendment CP\14-CMP-00909\25 PL20110002626/CPSS-2011-I/GMP Amendment for Church of LDS Page 3 of 3 Small Scale Amendment—Rev.6/25/14 Words underlined are added;words sttuek-thretigh have been deleted; * * * indicates break in pages ■ CPSS-2012-1 EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN Policy 1.1.2.: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES-MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Use Subdistrict 4. Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict 5. Mission Subdistrict 6. Everglades-Randall Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** A. Estates-Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 6. Everglades - Randall Subdistrict [Page 30] The Everglades-Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard and consists of 7.8 acres on Tract 115 and the east 150 ft. of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and related uses. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. A 75 ft. buffer shall be provided along the northern and western boundaries of the property within which a septic tank drain field and water management facilities are permitted. 65 feet shall consist of native vegetation materials from the three vegetative strata to serve as a transitional area between the church and the adjacent residential tracts. The buffer shall have an opacity of 80 percent at time of planting and an opacity of 100 percent within one year. Minimum yard requirements are for a corner lot and measured with two front setbacks and two side yard setbacks. One front yard setback will be 75 feet, the other front setback may be reduced to 37.5 feet. Side yards shall be a minimum of 75 feet. A minimum of a 10 feet wide Type B landscape buffer with native vegetation shall be provided along the parking edges. Water management areas shall not be located in this buffer. A minimum of 15 feet wide Type D buffers shall be provided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. Words underlined are added; words struck throes are deleted. Row of asterisks(*** *** ***)denotes break in text. CPSS-2012-1 The parking lot shall provide for. A maximum of 155 parking spaces, with 15 percent in grass parking. Loll The throat depth of the access drives shall be 30 feet measured from the roadway edge of pavement. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Golden Gate Area Master Plan Study Areas Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Mission Subdistrict Everglades— Randall Subdistrict Page 2 of 4 Words underlined are added; words struck-through are deleted. Row of asterisks(*** *** ***)denotes break in text. EXHIBIT A PETITION CPSS-2012-1 ...I LEGEND A t Os ■ MOAN 0leOMAl1014 !STATOR eeeMMA710M A02101L7UIAL/IYA OeMONATION 0% MI5 Y.O9Y1515) MO YU MINIM ❑MUM v,N NN 1 M s n ❑.50t,4901.4 worm., ❑4732...n.[. sNMr KP"`)°NAY.9. " '°'01` '"A"""` GOLDEN GATE AREA e91eC1.A MOWN! ■�.1P.CM.Y..NPN NN x1 aN.1.NY..1 a r,:a A=.::• <:,,. ■km0LE["'"cc...0s. ■-`°'mY1° - FUTURE LAND USE MAP GO ■ .N�2 - �. ■M �1 �_., aNN■9MN a ■IAN.■I•....CPA PM YNIR<, ■N F rz r*Nr.rNSaN�.. O0'�'r'55 OM1Y92 ■°AD01a°ic61.aP*9.saNn ■N1519*54L x:44.1 m1w NNYK1 ■ KuarvAN 065404 545A0., MM 1« w, ■1k Rea Y.w IMMOKALEE ROAD ■..bN..R...401....5.,NN.N, / T =El \ ❑u="9 ,rt • Now nos gm C..9E NNANN7M3 NM0..1 M CAA..mote AM,.uM CCSNANPx low.. Mom F 6l 4.01tArt MA um.hAx Fn p at CC d' 02 I OIL WELL ROAD F 7 IMMOKALEE ROAD $ 1 SUSITE T z r— RANDALL BOULEVARD CPSS-2012-1 o 5 n p 3 m VANDERBILT\ BEACH ROAD Gi PI CO 8 GOLDEN GATE .,d3 BOULEVARD i Z CO �< U PINE BIDOE RD. .0.7 WHITE BLVD. 0 CO• CG p m a ti z 3 y 0.0.PKWY. .. I a F , 1 O O. m oGE CO 0 < 1 INTERSTATE-25 02 S.N 91 ■ E- Z DAVIS BOULEVARD - - - .._ S.R.84 a __ _.. > — _ Q U: Io� d - _.. E- a c _ — X99 -. <° — rA GOLDEN GATE – --- FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED - FE66MARY.1991 AMENDED - OEG019ER 4.2007 ... ___ ONO N0.2007-77 AMEN= - MAY f6 1M2 . - AMlNON - 00204-11 14.2009 -- —14- 440•0711 - MAY 25,1941 CND.140.2006-69 - 20010[0 - JAY 27.1995 *MENDED - .7 26 2010 _. —-- ORO.NO 2010-31 CO AMENDED - APNE 12.1904 --,...6,...0 - AL?26 2010 ..._ - ONO N0.2010-52 _ 4EMOFD - *ARCM 14.1996 W AYENOED - OCfm[R 2),199) *ENDED - YP10�ER 11.2011 I -.. • F 010 N0 200-19 WENDED - wax.11.1496 _,.. i - AMENDED - 1-71011%9 E.1996 — AMENDED - FAC 44, Y 23.194 O -._- + AMENDED - goo 0.1000 AMENDED - MAR*13.2901 *MNDEO - WY II,2002 y AMEND© _ 0EPN:M9EN 10,2003 SCALE ■■-- ONO NO 20O,. AMENDED - OC109EN 26.2004 01D NO 2004-21 0 1 MI 2 M1. 3 MI, 4 MI. 5 co. • 40ENOEO - AMOR,25.2025 ORD.M0 2006-1 PNEPANED BY OS/GAD MAPPN4 541 MN AY[ - MIN.. 200) GROWN MANAGEMENT*42009/PLANNING S RFWLATp1 . ONO M SW)-19 D.N10 6/2014 FILE'CP55-2014-1.DWG I R26E I R27E I R2SE • Page 3 of 4 EXHIBIT A PETITION CPSS•2012.1 EVERGLADES-RANDALL SUBDISTRICT OR� COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA — I I i 10 1' 12 7 8 9 I i I z U a 8 x w w a ce o a 13 18 t/ 16 2 w 0 m OIL WELL ROAD I C.R.858 Z co O w In O• 3 (22 ce t� 23 I 19 > 20 21 ........■". .2 w -'a RANDALL BOULEVARD 27 2E 25 7.0 29 28 1 LEGEND SCALE / EVERDERANDALL PREPARED BY:01S/CAD MAPPING DEPARTMENT I I I / SUSDISTRiCT GR0616 MANAGEMENT DIVISION/RAMMING 0 REGULATION 0 2000 FT. 4000 FT. DATE: 6/2014 FILE: C005-2012-IA.DNG Page 4 of 4 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AND A RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on Thursday, July 17, 2014 at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber, Third Floor, County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL,to consider: ORDINANCE NO.2014- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY ESTABLISHING THE EVERGLADES- RANDALL SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF CHURCH/ PLACE OF WORSHIP AND RELATED USES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANDALL BOULEVARD AND EVERGLADES BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 19, 20, 29 AND 30 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, CONSISTING OF 7.80 ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1] RESOLUTION NO.2014- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A CHURCH WITHIN AN ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.C.1 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER AT THE INTERSECTION OF EVERGLADES BOULEVARD AND RANDALL BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 19,20,29 AND 30 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 28 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [CU-PL20110002615] ,2 10 > 6 0 c m a � � O W ,6 U 1♦ 13 18 5 12 18 O w 030 O > OIL WELL ROAD C.R.858 w LT: NO 12 23 24 22 ` 20 21 PROJECT LOCATION U RANDALL BOULEVARD 27 26 25 30 29 28 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Ordinance and Resolution will be made available for inspection at the Planning&Zoning Department,Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Planning &Zoning Department, Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday,July 17,2014,will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P. Strain, Chairman Collier County Planning Commission No.231130891 June 27,2014 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT E AND A RESOLUTION AN ORDINANCE N Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on, Thursday,July 17,2014 at 9:00 A.M.in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor, County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples,FL,to consider: NAPLES DAILY NEWS ORDINANCE NO.2014- Published Daily AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, Naples,FL 34110 FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT , a �+ AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY ESTABLISHING THE EVERGLADES- Affidavit O1 f Publicatio PLCE OF WORSHIP IAND RELATED USES. HE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED HATRTHE State of Florida NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANDALL'BOULEVARD AND EVERGLADES BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 19, 20,29 AND 30 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, CONSISTING OF 7.80 Counties of Collier and Lee ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY • AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1] Before the undersigned they serve as th RESOLUTION NO.2014- appeared Robin Calabrese, who on oatl PROVIDING RESOLUTION ESTABLISHMENT A CONDITIONALC SELITO ALLOW A CHURCH Advertising Director of the Naples Dail WITHIN AN ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.C.1 OF newspaper published at Naples, in Coll THE COUNTY LA DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHWEST COLLIER CORNER AT THE ND INTERSECTION OF EVERGLADES BOULEVARD AND RANDALL ON THE distributed in Collier and Lee counties BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 19,20,29 AND 30 TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 28 EAST,COLLIER attached copy of the advertising,being COUNTY,FLORIDA.[CU-PL20110002615] n ,, is , 5 e PUBLIC NOTICE ,, 5 in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE 4 ,5 0 '° m ¢ OIL WELL ROAD C R.858 w • was published in said newspaper 1 timt _ on June 27, 2014. 2 ,a V PROJECT LOCATION E RANDALL BOULEVARD • Affiant further says that the said Nap published at Naples, in said Collier Col => 28 ss 28 newspaper has heretofore been continu County,Florida; distributed in Collier E" All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Ordinance and .- each day and has been entered as secon Resolution will be made available for inspection at the Planning&Zoning Department,Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., office in Naples, in said Collier County Monday through Friday.Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier year next preceding the first publicatio County Clerk's Office,fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents advertisement; and affiant further says• should be directed to the Planning&Zoning Department,Comprehensive Planning Section.Written: promised any person, firm or corporatic comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday,July 17,2014,will be read and commission or refund for the purpose e considered at the public hearing. publication If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with m the said, ewspaper. respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which` record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. a/ t +ant If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this (Signature o ) proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department;located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Sworn to and s bs bed before me Mark P.Strain,Chairman T 1St day of J , 20114 Collier County Planning Commission June 27.2014 j, ] .� %/ No.231130891 1 A) �j� `r�l l� (Signature of notary public) 40'4; CAROL POUDORA ,. :.': MY COMMISSION#EE 851758 .:•. �:; EXPIRES:November 28,2014 -1, �:g,, „nF F,,. Bonded Thai Richard Insurance Agency APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH ,MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATOIN NUMBER CPSS-2012-1 DATE RECEIVED I OI00Li ( PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE I D.4 0 CI I C ( DATE SUFFICIENT This application,with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 (Fax 239-252-2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant Corp. Presiding Bishop LDS Church Company Address 4823 North Royal Atlanta Drive City Naples State FL Zip Code 30084-3806 Phone Number Fax Number B. Name of Agent * R. Bruce Anderson, Esq. • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Roetzel & Andress, LPA Address 850 Park Shore Drive City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-649-2708 Fax Number 239-261-3659 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record Corp. Presiding Bishop LDS Church Address_4823 North Royal Atlanta Drive City Tucker State GA Zip Code 30084-3806 Phone Number Fax Number D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. See Exhibit 1. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL,Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 1 of 121 Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. See Exhibit 2 for Articles of Incorporation Name and Address Percentage of Stock #1) 4024308000 100% #2) 40243040007 Corp. Presiding Bishop LDS Church-Property 50 East North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84150 C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 2 of 121 Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired (x) June 28, 2012 leased ( ): Term of lease_yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: . H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit 3 B. GENERAL LOCATION The northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Rural Estates D. TAZ 393 E. SIZE IN ACRES 7.8 total F. ZONING Estates G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN vacant residential H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Estates IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element Future Land Use Element x Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 3 of 121 B. AMEND PAGE (S) 34 OF THE Golden Gate Master Plan ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: Please refer to the Exhibit 4 for information regarding the type of request. supportive data and analysis, and the propose text amendment. C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION. FROM Estates TO The Everglades Randall Subdistrict. See Exhibit 4.1 D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN 1"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit 5.A Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit 5.B Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit 5.0 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit 5.D Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit 5.E Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE:THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit 5.E Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 4 of 121 D.GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A. Y/N Exhibit 4 Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5%of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes,indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Exhibit 4 and 5.F Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-11.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit 5.G Potable Water Exhibit 5.G Sanitary Sewer Exhibit 6.A Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Exhibit 5.G Drainage Exhibit 5.G Solid Waste Exhibit 5.G Parks:Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit 5.H Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e.water,sewer,fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services.The Church will with be accommodated by nearby fire, police and medical services as shown on Exhibit 5.H.Water and sewer are self provided, and schools are not affected. 3. Exhibit 5.G Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 5 of 121 Exhibit 5.1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). Exhibit 5.0 Location of wellfields and cones of influence,if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) x $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Exhibit 5.J Proof of ownership (copy of deed) X Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1"=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 6 of 121 ter .nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net AFFIDAVIT We/I, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a Utah corporation sole, being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/I are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owners We/I further authorize R. Bruce Anderson, Es „ofloetzel & Andress, L.P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. /j� � Signature of Owner Rte Pr), pt cc,.,tf,P N ribEr Typed or Printed Name of Property Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / jy �. day of `->i 7-( ;.,t., , 201 , by ! Ct-.t. r-ti 1')'t I JrC�C .t ,,'C:r who is personally known to me or has produced i-'c 1 -�,,c -c y.;c..,. ,, as identification. _: , YID 3110i-D try 1 / State of r:(-0.--c t -ct (Signature of Notar Public County of j_ e l � ONpV.DP 4,, • •0?.�111SSlp�t' ./c") „i. •jc' �e 3v ,• �`. '3a' �b (Print, Type,or StamptOmmissione6P m _ ■ Name of NotPub `�'" * "1111 t tf jlo���!\`� Affidavit of Church of Jesus Christ for Collier County.doc Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 7 of 121 Exhibit 5.K:Agent Authorizations THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE FACILITIES DEPARTMENT 50 East North Temple Street Salt Lake City,Utah 84150-0011 September 13,2012 Collier County Government Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,Florida Re: Rick Piacente as designated representative for Owner for the new Church Meetinghouse project at Golden Gate Estates Meetinghouse in Collier County Florida. To whom it may concern, This letter is to confirm that Rick Piacente, as Project Manager, is the individual designated to act on behalf of the property owner, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the "Church"), relative to the above referenced project, including the signing for permits, applications, and other documents and submissions required by Collier County in regards to the construction of the Golden Gate Estates Meetinghouse in Collier County,Florida. The undersigned is an authorized agent for the Church (as evidenced by the attached certificate of authority). Sincerely, �/A' ' . red W. Doxe, irector,North American Operations Enclosure Subscribed and sworn before me this 414 day of—a 171b.1 1 -.- 2012. GI Ili) AIX - _ Notary Put �' '`�\ CINDY GROWCOCK • a� = NOTARY PUBLIC•STATE OF UTAH sic My Comm.Exp.01/04/2016 Commission#651473 l 4837-3373-7233.1 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 8 of 121 {• CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY 1,H.David Burton,do hereby certify(a)that I am the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,a religious association, and by virtue of such office I am the incumbent of Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,a Utah corporation sole;(b)that 1 tun the person designated In the Articles of Incorporation of said corporation sole to sign and execute deeds and other instruments in writing and transact all business of said corporation pursuant to the provisions of Section 16-7-8 of the Utah Code Annotated, 1953,as amended;and(c)that,pursuant to said Section 16-7-8,I hereby designate and appoint Jared W,Doxey as an agent authorized and empowered for and in behalf of said corporation sole to take the following actions in transactions whose dollar value does not exceed$5,000,000: (a) To execute deeds, easements and other Instruments, purchase, sale, architectural, construction, repair, maintenance and other contracts,promissory notes,mortgages,bills of sale,assignments,notices,reports, title documents and other documents relating to the acquisition,purchase,sate,exchange,development,use, lease,maintenance,repair,Improvement,taxation,encumbrance and release thereof,or other disposition of real and personal property of any kind; (b) To execute,file and prosecute building permit applications,petitions,complaints and protests relating to real and personal property of any kind; (c) To execute instruments,proxies,voting trusts,voting agreements and other documents relating to water rights and stock in water,canal and irrigation companies. EXECUTED and DATED at Salt Lake City,Utah this.10 day of /Ca-i-ei'- -"41 2010. CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS • • — BY V H.Da, ::r on,incumbent STATE OF UTAH ) i ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ` On the J 0 day of /LO 40-4-" , 2010, personally appeared before me I-I. David Burton, personally known to me to be the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and acknowledged to me that he signed the foregoing Instrument as incumbent of Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,and the said H.David Burton acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same, NOTARI�' IC in and for said County and State JULIA C. BAKER rt NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE Of UTAH . ; My Comm.Exp.1/08/2013 Commission#877018 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 9 of 121 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1 List of Exhibits Section I. General Information Exhibit 1 - Professional Qualifications II. Disclosure of Interest Exhibit 2 - Articles of Incorporation III. Description of Property Exhibit 3 - Legal Descriptions, Folio Numbers, Street Address, Approximate Acres IV. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request Exhibit 4 - Narrative Statement, Supportive Data and Analysis, and Proposed Text Amendment Exhibit 4.1 - Proposed Future Land Use Map designation Map 4.A- Collier County Boundary Membership Map Map 4.B - Golden Gate Estates Boundary Membership Map Map 4.0 - Golden Gate Master Plan Overlay on Membership Map V. Required Information Exhibit 5.A- General Location Map Exhibit 5.B -Aerial Map Exhibit 5.0- Land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet Exhibit 5.D - Existing FLUM with Project Location and Acreage Exhibit 5.E - Aerial Map and summary of native habitats and soils Exhibit 5.F - Response to Application Item V.(D)(1) Exhibit 5.G - Response to Application Item V(E)(1) Exhibit 5.H - Public Facilities Exhibit 5.1 - FEMA FIRM 12021CO245H Exhibit 5.J - Deeds Exhibit 5.K - Listed Species and FL Master Site File Correspondence Exhibit 5.L -Transportation Impact Statement Exhibit 5.M - Pre-application meeting notes VI. Companion Conditional Use Application CU-PL20120002615, Master Concept Plan VII. Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 10 of 121 SECTION I General Information Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 11 of 121 Qualifications Summary for Anita Jenkins, AICP Anita Jenkins, AICP is the Director of Planning with J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. Through her planning career with both the public and private sector, Ms. Jenkins has developed significant expertise in comprehensive planning, land use policy, zoning and public participation. Ms. Jenkins has practiced urban and regional planning in Collier County since 1993 beginning with the Collier County MPO. She has represented clients through the host of land use application processes including growth management plan amendments, rezoning, conditional uses, and land development code amendments. Ms. Jenkins serves on the University of Florida Urban and Regional Planning Advisory Board, and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners, the International Association of Public Participation, the Urban Land Institute and the American Planning Association. Ms. Jenkins' critical thinking and innovative solutions has led to recognition with multiple awards including two Outstanding Public Report Awards, a Sustainable Florida Award, and an Award of Excellence. Ms. Jenkins earned her Masters of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Florida and Bachelor of Science at Missouri State University. Qualifications Summary for Daniel Hartley, P.E. Daniel Hartley, P.E. is the Director of Land Development with J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. Mr. Hartley has provided professional consulting services for multiple residential and commercial developments in Collier County and plays a key role in managing development projects from conception to certification. Responsibilities include pre-development consultation, engineering project management, project team coordination, infrastructure layout, utility and storm water management systems design, cost estimating, plan drafting, permitting, and services during construction. Mr. Hartley is skilled in various design and modeling programs utilized in civil engineering design and development, and has experience in the support of land entitlement processes within Collier County. Mr. Hartley holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Florida and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Florida. Qualifications Summary for Josh Evans, P.E. Josh Evans, P.E. is the President of JR Evans Engineering, P.A. (Estero, FL) and Principal of KMF Environmental Consulting (Louisville, KY). Mr. Evans has senior-level management experience as both consultant and developer of utility, surface water management, agricultural, airport, mixed use, park, school, resort, and senior Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 12 of 121 living projects. Mr. Evans has provided professional consulting services in the design, permitting, value engineering, and project management in all aspects of land development projects to public and private sector clients. He specializes in expert witness testimonies related to utility and water management design as well as land entitlement. Mr. Evans holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Kentucky and a Masters of Engineering from the University of Florida. He is a registered professional engineer and published author in the subject of water resource engineering. He is a member of the Collier Building Industry Association, the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Florida Engineering Society. Qualifications Summary for Michael Herrera, P.E. Michael Herrera, P.E., is a Senior Project Manager with J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. Mr. Herrera offers over 15 years of experience in consulting land development projects in Southwest Florida. His capabilities encompass the full development process from conceptual site planning to construction certification for residential, commercial, and mixed use projects. He has successfully designed and constructed projects within the full array of jurisdictional regulatory permitting agencies. He has experience formulating innovative project solutions for small and large scale projects. Some of the projects he has managed include Fiddler's Creek, Talis Park (f.k.a Tuscany Reserve), Mercedes Benz, ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, Gridley Medical Building, among many others. Mr. Herrera holds a Bachelor of Science from the Colorado School of Mines, is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Florida, and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Florida Engineering Society. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 13 of 121 TIMOTHY HALL TURRELL,HALL&ASSOCIATES,INC. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 643-0166 thall @turrell-associates.com Tim Hall is a Principal at Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc., and is also the Senior Ecologist for the firm. Tim works closely with federal, state, and local agencies to obtain approvals for a number of marina and residential development projects. His field skills include plant and animal species identification, habitat assessments, wetland delineations, wildlife surveys, and wetland restoration. EDUCATION Baccalaureate Studies: Wildlife Ecology University of Florida, 1986-1989 Masters Studies: Wildlife Ecology &Wetland Ecosystems University of Florida, 1990-1991 Certified Rescue Diver Continuing Education • 2008 University of Florida- FDEP SOP Sampling Training for Groundwater, Surface Water and Wastewater • 2008 ESRI Introduction to ArcGIS II Class • 2006 Florida Green Industries Best Management Practices Course • 2005 Florida Chamber's- Florida Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method Class • 2005 The Florida Chamber's- Growth Management and Environmental Permitting Short Course • 2003- Completed the Department of Environmental Protection Wetland Delineation Training Program. Fort Myers, Florida. • 2002- Completed the FAEP Plant Identification Class with Dr. David Hall PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE • 1987-1988: University of Florida, IFAS Program — Key Deer research: collected and analyzed forage samples and used capture and release techniques to assess deer health. • 1988-1989: Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit — Alligator population research: collected, incubated, and hatched alligator eggs to assist in determination of potential repopulation rates. • 1989: Alaska Department of Natural Resources — Marmot Population Study: conducted visual field survey counts of marmot burrows in remote field locations. • 1990-1991: PMW Consulting — Wetland design and construction: Implemented studies for wetland creation/enhancement and monitoring projects in the south-eastern U.S. • 1991-1993: Peace Corps, Guatemala - Defensores del la Naturaleza: Delineated boundaries for the Sierras de las Minas Biosphere Reserve, implemented floral and faunal Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 14 of 121 Timothy Hall Resume Page 2 of 3 surveys, taught classes on soil conservation techniques and environmental management to local villagers. • 1993-1997: Power Corp: China, Central America, Canada, and Southern African Projects —Geologic and environmental survey: Conducted sample collection,mineral surveys, and feasibility studies in very remote locations. Produced habitat management plans and recovery/restoration plans for mining operations in Angola and Zaire. • 1997-Present: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. — Senior Ecologist: Oversee permitting efforts for a variety of projects. Conduct habitat assessments, wetland delineations, wildlife surveys, as well as create wetland restoration and habitat management plans. ORGANIZATIONS • Naples Botanical Garden(former Director 1998-2000) • The Wildlife Society(Current Florida Chapter At-Large Board Member) • Florida Association of Environmental Professionals • Society of Wetland Scientists • Florida Native Plant Society ECOLOGICAL/TERRESTRIAL BIOLOGY EXPERIENCE Floral and Faunal studies established and conducted in Alaska, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Angola, and Zaire as well as throughout Florida. Studies conducted include species specific population surveys, vegetation density and diversity surveys, vegetation composition surveys, vegetation/ecological restoration projects • Alaskan work focused on population studies of hoary marmots in the Denali National Park. In addition to burrow counts, ecotonal variations and transitions between vegetative communities were also noted. • The majority of the work conducted in Guatemala focused on the "Sierras de las Minas" Biosphere Reserve. Floral and faunal surveys were designed to document existing plant and animal populations as well as identify different ecotones for future monitoring efforts. Also designed and implemented a re-forestation project on a 17-acre hillside that had been used for vegetable crop production. • Work in the Dominican Republic consisted of a preliminary ecological assessment. Vegetative communities, vegetative health, ecological linkages and existing wildlife utilization were examined in order to determine potential enhancement and restoration opportunities for an ongoing development project. • The primary work focus in Angola and Zaire was geared towards minimizing the potential for environmental impacts during mineral exploration activities. Habitat management plans, wildlife management plans, habitat restoration plans and strip mine reclamation plans were created, as needed for the different mine sites. • Work in Florida has been varied and ongoing for the last eleven years. Some of the specific projects completed and/or underway include; o Oversee the restoration efforts on a 500+ acre mangrove preserve. Approximately 50 acres died in 1995 and we designed and implemented a restoration plan geared towards the recovery of the die-off area. To date, the work has been successful in Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 15 of 121 Timothy Hall Resume Page 3 of 3 that the area is recovering, wildlife utilization has vastly expanded, and the new mangroves have now survived two hurricanes. o Created a mangrove and marsh mitigation peninsula in conjunction with a marina project (2002). The project to date has seen over 95% survival of the planted vegetation as well as natural recruitment of additional native vegetation and estuarine wildlife. o Conduct wetland delineation surveys to both State of Florida and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers specifications. Delineated lines have been accepted by agency personnel and have withstood administrative challenges from outside groups. o Provide expert witness testimony for wildlife and wetland issues on projects. o Designed and permitted a Collier County Park that allowed visitor access to an approximately 80-acre preserve area with minimal impacts to the preserve. o Conduct species-specific wildlife surveys and analyses in order to determine utilization and/or potential utilization of properties by target species. Species surveyed for include Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), Red-Cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Crested caracara (Caracara cheriway audubonii), Florida Scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Eastern Indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Florida mouse (Podomys floridanus), Wood stork (Mycteria americana), Southern Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Florida burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia floridana), American crocodile(Crocodylus acutus), as well as several others. o Design educational interpretational signage related to local plants and animals. Vegetative descriptions and potential wildlife sightings are site specific and tailored to the individual project. These signs are then located in appropriate areas to educate facility users regarding local ecosystems and wildlife. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 16 of 121 JAMES M. BANKS, P.E., PRESIDENT Certifications&Positions Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering - University of Kentucky, 1986 Professional Engineer- State of Florida—Reg. No.43860, 1991 to Present JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., President/Owner—2007 to Present Q&E Overview Mr. Banks has been actively involved in the fields of traffic/transportation engineering and planning since 1987. During the past 25 years, he has developed a comprehensive knowledge within these disciplines and is regarded as an expert within his profession. Mr. Banks has represented a wide range of clientele in both the public and private sectors. Public sector clients include airport authorities & FAA, local and state municipalities, county commissions, public school boards, city councils, planning boards, and city/county attorneys. Private sector clients have been land planners, land use attorneys, right-of-way acquisition attorneys, engineers, surveyors, architects and developers. Corridor Planning Mr. Banks has conducted a significant number of roadway corridor studies for both the public and private sectors. His work efforts included developing a comprehensive and strategic corridor improvement plan to meet the long term transportation objectives for the area. By forecasting area- wide long range traffic demands, Mr. Banks developed transportation needs plans in order to ensure adequate roadway capacity. Example projects are Alico Road Six-Laning, Lee Boulevard Improvements, Southwest International Airport's Transportation Needs Plan, Bonita Beach Road Access Management Plan, and Fort Myers Beach - Time Square Traffic Circulation Study. Transportation Design Mr. Banks has been engineer of record on numerous transportation design projects; such as, complex intersection design, signalization, street lighting, maintenance of traffic plans, signing and pavement marking plans, vehicular accident analysis, major roadway improvement design, traffic calming plans, railroad crossing design, and access management plans. Projects include Colonial Boulevard Improvements, Immokalee Road Widening Project, Lee Boulevard Six-Laning, Bonita Beach Road and Alico Road Widening. Expert Witness Mr. Banks has provided expert witness testimony at numerous court proceedings and public hearings regarding traffic/transportation related matters. He has testified in various forums; such as, county commission meetings, hearing examiner reviews, courts of law, public workshops, port authority meetings, and peer review functions.Types of issues that Mr. Banks provided testimony for were right-of-way acquisition cases;zoning and land use amendments, land development projects, corridor studies, roadway improvement projects, transportation improvement projects, and airport construction projects. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 17 of 121 Qualifications Summary for R. Bruce Anderson Bruce Anderson is a partner in the Naples office of the Roetzel & Andress law firm. Mr. Anderson's practice focuses on governmental law with an emphasis on land use planning, zoning, development and environmental issues. He is also a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Court Mediator. Mr. Anderson has practiced law in Collier County since 1982 beginning in the County Attorney's office, and is also admitted to practice in Illinois. He has represented property owners on the complete range of land use issues including rezoning, comprehensive plan amendments, environmental regulations, state growth management law compliance and public/private partnerships. Mr. Anderson serves on the Board of Directors of the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce and the Urban Land Institute, Southwest Florida District Executive Council. He is an "AV" rated attorney, the highest rating by the Martindale Hubbell Law Directory. Mr. Anderson has also been selected for inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America for Land Use and Zoning from 2007 through 2013 and in 2012 was honored by them as Land Use & Zoning Lawyer of the Year for Collier and Lee Counties. Mr. Anderson earned a juris doctorate degree from Stetson University College of Law and a bachelor of science degree from Illinois State University. 44267244 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 18 of 121 SECTION II Disclosure of Interest Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 19 of 121 CCC' EX �- Exhibit 2 RECEIVED Ea AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF FEB 27 1997 THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA'I-I'ER-DAY SAINTS u1i DR,of CO RR COMM C0 ' Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 16-7-14, the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints amends and restates its Articles of Incorporation to read in their entirety as follows ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION: First. The name of the corporation shall be the"Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." Second. The object of this Corporation shall be to acquire, hold, and dispose of such real and personal property as may be conveyed to said Corporation for religious and charitable purposes and public worship of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a religious society; consequently this Corporation has not been organized for the purpose of making a profit. Such real and personal property may be situated, either within the State of Utah, or elsewhere, and this Corporation shall have power, without any authority or authorization of the members of said Church or religious society, to grant, sell, convey, rent, mortgage, exchange, or otherwise dispose of the same, or any u, part thereof; however, this Corporation is prohibited from declaring or paying dividends, and in no case shall its income or assets be distributed directly or indirectly among the members of the Church. Third. The estimated value of the property of which I hold the legal title for the purpose aforesaid, at the time of making these Articles of Incorporation, is $16,000.00. --a Fourth. The title of the person making these Articles of Incorporation is "Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." Fifth. The corporate seal shall contain the words, "Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," and an impression thereof is hereto affixed. Sixth. In the winding up and dissolution of this Corporation, after paying or adequately providing for the debts and obligations of the Corporation, the remaining assets shall be distributed among legal entities of similar objectives,that is, to a non-profit fund, foundation or corporation,which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, religious and/or scientific purposes Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 20 of 121 and which has established its tax exempt status under § 501(cX3) (or its successor)of the Internal Revenue Code. IN WITNESS WHEREOF these AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION are adopted by the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints this February&i 1997 st +: CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS : e:..t th �':;a`:.4jM CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS 'E . ;estu:� arc hceay ia;� By. r _; 47-2/ _ a�id purl Presiding Bishop and Corporation Sole STATE OF UTAH ) ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE) On the oz 72:4 day of February, 1997,personally appeared before me H. David Burton,who is known to me to be the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and successor to the original Presiding Bishop of said Church and the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such Presiding Bishop, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the corporation sole as the lawful and proper successor in office to the original incorporator. Notary Publ'W Residing in Salt Lake County "•\ CONNIE J.ROBERTS '1.4W t Notary Public ; „27 State of Utah My Comm.Expires Mar 1.11X0 ► W:W009\0016\RPL-CPB2.ART '••• SOE Noah Tv*.itAFl Ste UTum 2 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 21 of 121 70G1 AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF HE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints hereby amends its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation by adding the following article: '1 "Seventh. -ti 0 "If, upon winding up and dissolution, this Corporation has assets, after paying or ^, adequately providing for the Corporation's debts and obligations,situated in a country other than the United States of America,then,as and to the extent required by the laws of such other country,such net assets shall be distributed to one or more legal entities, to be used for charitable,educational,religious and/or scientific purposes, that have established their tax- exempt status under the laws of such other country." CAB t?aparvn-w �A^ CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING .ra 01 C rwa t dGorporaboro and ConrnsmalCode BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS 0 hifoy maul trig.migro=nat CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS and&favored on to na okca ot ra Diairon and Noreen issue �. Ina C.rtkau bored. �� ' C Winne( eF DaM Aa‘f Of Ail' e74/ BY t 1. a :` ,a. Burton Di�oneV„cer Presiding Bishop of The Church of w Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ro STATE OF UTAH ) ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE On the_EL/eh day of June,2001, personally appeared before me H. David Burton, personally known to me to be the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,and acknowledged to me that he signed the foregoing instrument as incumbent of Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,and the said H. David Burton acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. 4 JUNIN '�•�a'se A+y Cams�a� !14 MN TARS'P,/JC in and for said County and.Statd R 'JD E Nar1h uT 64104 Date: L724i200 Receipt Numb 34`-7.5 Amount Pad VS Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 22 of 121 SECTION III Description of Property Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 23 of 121 Exhibit 3: Legal Description Legal Description, folio numbers, street address, approximate acreage. PARCEL 1 - LDS • Folio: 40243080009 • East 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69, Plat of Golden Gate Estates, Recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 53, Official Records of Collier County, Florida. • +2.34 acres • 3045 Randall Boulevard Naples, FL. Property acquired June 28, 2012. PARCEL 2 - LDS • Folio: 40243040007 • Tract 115, Unit 69, Plat of Golden Gate Estates, Recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 53, Official Records of Collier County, Florida. • + 5.46 acres • No site address available, per County Property Appraiser online records. Property acquired September 7, 2012. 6193222_2 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 24 of 121 SECTION IV Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 25 of 121 Exhibit 4 Type of Request, Supportive Data and Analysis and Proposed Amendment Language The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints seeks approval for a small scale amendment and a conditional use to build a place of worship for its members who live in the Golden Gate Estates area. Attached are two maps which show the number of Church members live in proximity of the subject property and the locations of their other chapels in the Golden Gate area that have reached membership capacity. The chapel will not become a "mega-church." Unique religious beliefs of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ensure limited use: In the LDS Church, members attend services where they live. All congregations have geographic boundaries. This means the proposed chapel will be regularly used only by people who live within those defined boundaries. Also, the LDS Church caps the size of its congregations for religious reasons. There is no paid ministry. Local members run the chapels by participating in volunteer "callings." Church doctrine teaches that all members need the opportunity to actively participate, and that can only happen if congregations remain small. The Church and its local members critically need the proposed chapel. Currently, the Church's local congregation travels elsewhere and existing facilities are inadequate. Limited seating, commotion and other symptoms of overcrowding all combine to substantially impair both the ability to worship and the quality of services in existing facilities. Overcrowding is disruptive, prevents growth, reduces individual participation in worship, forces the elimination of religious courses, and restricts the youth ministries. Moreover, the local congregations cannot subdivide as required by the faith because there is nowhere for a new congregation to go. Map 4.A shows the Church's three distinct boundary areas in Collier County, the Immokalee Branch, where Spanish speaking members attend, the Golden Gate Estate Branch and the Naples Ward. Membership locations are shown with orange, green and blue dots as assigned within each boundary area. The Church's search for suitable property for a permanent location was based on several criteria including, first and foremost the need to remain in Golden Gate Estates in close proximity to the current meeting house. For this reason, properties outside the limits of Golden Gate Estates do not meet the needed central location to serve all the members within the Church's Golden Gate Estate boundary. Other factors considered include accessibility, ingress and egress, neighborhood compatibility, property availability and cost. Looking more closely within the subject Golden Gate Estate boundary, Map 4.B shows the proximity of members to both the current temporary meeting site and the proposed chapel site within the Golden Gate Estates Branch. Opportunities within Golden Gate Estates to meet the Church's locational needs for their new chapel are extremely constrained. Map 4-C the Golden Gate Master Plan overlay within the Church's Golden Gate Estates boundary shows there are only twenty parcels within the Neighborhood Centers that allow for conditional uses. These parcels are either built upon or were not listed for sale. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 26 of 121 Other properties that may qualify for Transitional Conditional Uses were also built upon or not listed for sale. These constraints caused the search for a suitable location to extend beyond these twenty parcels within Golden Gate Estates. The need to remain in Golden Gate Estates and proximate to members was a primary criteria in the Church's search for a suitable parcel in Golden Gate Estates. A suitable site was found at the intersection of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard. This site near to their members and at the signalized intersection of two arterial roads is an appropriate and logical location for the chapel. In order to accomplish the Church's plan, an amendment to the Golden Gate Estates Area Master Plan and a Conditional Use must be approved. As shown on Exhibit 5-A, the proposed Golden Gate Estates chapel site of 7.8 acres is located at the northwest corner of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard. The Transportation Impact Statement submitted with this application, Exhibit 6.A, includes the information from the County's 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. In summary, both of these roads are planned for expansion. Randall Boulevard is planned for six lanes and Everglades Boulevard is planned for four lanes. This change in conditions result in property designated with an incompatible use for a single family home. This application proposes a compatible use with the multi-lane arterial roads. A neighborhood-scale chapel at this location is compatible with both the roadway expansions and with the surrounding residents. The corner location and planned improvements create a prime location for the Church's need for ease of access, ingress and egress, and proximity to members. The chapel is planned for no more than 20,000 square feet. The chapel will be used primarily on Sunday and a few evenings per week for meetings and membership gatherings. The chapel will not have offices or administrative staff so there will not be daily activities occurring. This is a neighborhood-scale use, with limited activity and is compatible with adjacent Estates uses. The companion Conditional Use application includes a Conceptual Master Plan, included herein for information. The plan illustrates additional site design measures such as 75-foot buffers, native preserves and landscaping to further ensure compatibility with adjacent Estates uses. Based on the information provided herein, the Growth Management Plan amendment is warranted to allow for a Conditional Use for a church at the subject intersection of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. The warrants include: 1) the unavailability of property within existing and designated Conditional Use and Transitional Use areas, 2) a significant change in the Golden Gate Estates roadway conditions with the County's plan to expand Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard to multiple-lane highways, 3) intersection and roadway expansion creates undesirable conditions for residential use, and 4) the proposed church use is compatible with Estate uses and compatible with the change in intersection and roadway conditions. To accomplish the designation of a Conditional Use on the subject property, the following Growth Management Plan amendment language is proposed to create the Everglades-Randall Subdistrict Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 27 of 121 Proposed Growth Management Plan Text Amendment (XVII) 6. Everglades-Randall Subdistrict The Everglades-Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard and consists of 7.8 acres on Tract 115 and the east 150 ft. of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and related uses. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. A 75 ft. buffer shall be provided along the northern and western boundaries of the propoerty within which a septic tank drain field and water management facilities are permitted. 65 feet shall consist of native vegetation materials from the three vegetative strata to serve as a transitional area between the church and the adjacent residential tracts. The buffer shall have an opacity of 80 percent at the time of planting and an opacity of 100 percent within one year. Minimum yard requirements are for a corner lot and measured with two front setbacks and two side yard setbacks. One front yard setback will be 75 feet, the other front setback may be reduced to 37.5 feet. Side yards shall be a minimum of 75 feet. A minimum of a 10 feet wide Type B landscape buffer with native vegetation shall be provided along the parking edges, Water management areas shall not be located in this buffer. A minimum of 15 feet wide Type D buffers shall be provided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. The parking lot shall provide for. (a) A maximum of parking 155 spaces, with 15 percentage in grass parking. (b) The throat depth of the access drives shall be 30 feet measured from the roadway edge of pavement. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 28 of 121 LEGEND URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DE/IGMATIOM AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION Exhibit 4 . 1 9R®,N[OEM. MTN. 0 WV,F.Mmt..9A Oe1nCT 0 YR.10.0.1.31.1731113C7 WM DOCZTT 111401141.WM... ❑ MAILS. OVERLAYS AND GOLDEN GATE AREA SPECIAL FEATURES ❑01.314..my=maw..9mm�"cr le D1R weeu.R®B1Rn a w�u�rz MIRY. UM, �w9�� FUTURE LAND USE MAP cis •M9R...mm@„w9. T ® 9�aiva„voi■. �°°- ��� i_� (AS PROPOSED) F 0...TA......COMO..,1..0151"n mom.NITA= •MI . ❑.0if°°*"AT IMMORALEE ROAD •COLS IMIIVA O MOW.,llOCnsT 1X PAM 0..1 -.m. N nE.D¢Ra.D YID i8 9»Jnecr 1 .. .....al MAL-WO ON.pp.RRRe11.cr O ru sss°er v..rzs Olin awn ewe... WM DB Mn ppM� 5 VONCV PO 91 TM1wmm 99100 ..-- ❑mY R AM LIt N 01 a OM/RAR977,1 aNR 01017 •PROPOSED in "EVERGLADES-RANDALL co SUBDISTRICT" (7.8 acres) OIL WELL ROAD F IMMOKALEE ROAD 1 t z RA NDALL BOULEVARD a DI VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD n Cj ' y. z s 8 GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD Z at El <S PINE RIDGE RD. 0 WHITE BLVD. 0 J '< MT O / r ; < r � . • 8 0. G.O.PKWY. . i6 A s i o■ d w < 00 ATR.73 B.H.84 — DAVIS BOULEVARD 0 -" B.R.84 C ----- - G 504 1 M Mn - F Ti�' .,,, `�b t GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AOOPIED - EEEBIMY,1991 AMEMCD - OEM..A 2027 AMENDED - MAY 19.1902 ORD.�.1007-T2 q MENDED - OCTOBER 14,2000 c■ AMOCO - MAY 23,1995 -J OBE.NI 2009-59 ARMED - JILT n,1991 Amour - AAY It 2010 5 OR4 ND.2010-31 co AMENDED - AML 12.1994 AMEND= - JAY 24 2010 B , . � WADED - MARDI 14,1993 OT.NO 1010-32 10 - AMENDED - 9E1,11MBER 14 2011 MELDED - OCTOBER 27.1997 an NO.2011-29 _ F AMENDED - MM.I4,1999 i'' NAMED - 9E9050 I 9.1999 . Al1ODE0 - F VARY 21,1999 (31 -� ARMED - NAY 4 ROOD ARMCO - MARO1 13,2001 i AVER= - MAT I4,2002 ♦ • MCERCED - W ITMER 14 2003 SCALE ORO NI 206}-« AMERCED - OCIm01 24 200. 1 1 1 1 099.It 2004-71 0 1 IA. 2 MI. 3 MI. 4 MI. 5 MI. AMENDED - JANUARY 24 2000 010.N0.1003-3 PREPARED St 45/7Y0 MARPNG SECTION MENDED - JANUARY 24 2W) GROWN MANAGEMENT 5510099/PLANING 4 REGULATION ONO.110.2007-19 DATE 9/2011 FILE:GGRU-2011.DWC I R26E I R27E R28E Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 29 of 121 5 ' Prepared i/J Gl By: GENERAL NOTES Solutions L E H I GI/ ACRES 1.This map is for reference only.Data provided are derived from p multiple sources with varying levels of accuracy. 13...d4u•ruY.AM . 13,405.4204 raI + 832 Snt hxe.!Flondt l.,rl Alrpal 82 Id i F= } GoldenGate Estates Branch ... "%V*•••_� &Imm___okalee Branch•• •••••••••••••••••••• 8:: .•••••••••••••••••••••• 'ori Mr t+s 6a.ich •••••••••••••••••• •- ••••••••4 ..— •,y, •••••�,•••••••• yI ►•••••••••••••••••vii••`•••••••••••••••,• '41 m ,•••••w•t i•••••••••••••••••••••••••••e 'Irn .P••••'►•••••••••••••- '..4.,.S I N G S g�:, s►•.1•••••••••••••••••<••••••••••••••••e j ►•••••••••••••••••• Golden Gate {i•••i••••••••••••••••••••••O•••••••• Estates nchj ItS}I , . ' ' tLil.._-..Jj a \N..r-_s...w:z ..ICJ.. �_3L.v V V/ Proposed Golden Gate Estates, Golden Gate Estates :.`-.....9, 41-", t Meeting House Location I, Branch Boundary Royal Palm anmock MARCO ISLAND ` Z" Laa Copeland Lypr•sso u O oodland Tdrl )(ami 1 "`�zr Ochop•e Evrrgladrs City 90 " •i. bCh ok olosk ve —1 7- CD 7 1 c 4 0 c_ N 1/ N Naples Ward D- cn GULF 0 OF lv a MEXICO 0) 0 0) L E G E N D to o "9 Golden Gate Estates Branch Member lv • Immokalee Branch Member(Spanish) Naples Ward Member :4:40, lmmokalee Branch .o CO O Golden Gate Estates Branch CID M O Naples Ward a. A �.; The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints A ,,,/,,Members/tip Location flap 4.A 1 , o v oo Z W W t ttn®� rn 0 0 a W 0 0 T „ t 0 n ••I N_ LYY 2 w e o • E N to w n W 6' ; , v :Eq., E C 0 C \ W V Z 1 N iii 0 71.1 as CO 1 o 'C 5- Q 1 0 r *4 I - co o ze W E ( o as a3 , I I 0 m I ] q a. ;00 Cihe i ^o Y OOP -IMM• __._1__.t_1 O ) °".4 . , A, ^i h• ' • w V o, i ' ,S $ Z z,I ^n •� W IWQ V O) y •.. • mti ;,o I • J a 0� C �.• (7 J G • • I ,. S +r e„ D p p-' ' . ii ;j •• '•• lv v • • I V �? qa o • ba• O •• s E., • o • • • pGp E • •• 2'C tif, $ a I •' ;• g � a this mit a tlttt1111111 ti t. _ - • • W F e r T O s.t G •S • WI=own • •iii 3 Z °Lx I •1 • - •• 1” .i• i• i. I+ • 7i • , • • o W ® • • �S• • • r•' •' Oa S Z e ° IN '� J• 4 tBSi. W • ]v 9 Fi ®3 0 -!�� • ••� Aj ir,, a 1V,S v i E. u]- c. ,.1 3 _ ,. •+ pry. E' 3 �J� Q 3 O 3 3 SZ 3 C 7, E c 33 CC 3 C L Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/012014 Page 31 of 121 r;_ 1 ; 4 S _9.* ,, a dam@ ' • w T,t 733 I m Dis c. . tm- "`'...— t CL o ta . 4- 'F. K ,... u, 3 / _ .. _ ,.. .. .. . . . .. .. . y = As 1 Q st O SCIO yr .7 N to ti h o Y w w t44- h C W n • t ti w d r l7 r.' v + � m Rm L• J Y w. C v Cl IU u v m a r 1 w o . Z e G /� C 0 s n t7 z ce N y C w C (1.g ..." 4 - d G ` n�• ?�Qi� o " ,�0 0 .. 000 1 d ~ la a o:, 0: t9 - , t9 L ,... 11.(D.,, 2, -',.,4. -,t-z . „ ..' , -e2 - 6 .....,-...„., ,- v, .„--- il -- r . ....Y.. yj of z aQ a ,,. '�,. r .s.- .r.St i l -„ • °' 1111 N eA101 __. \r U v COI 1 t p Ca) w ' ;,i Cs t. f 1 i s 4�f Ai � O ' 1 ?.ter C a C. _ C B, Eli X � ii4 Y ., � k a a era +i• -&. 4 Page 32 0l 121 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 SECTION V Required Information Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 33 of 121 Exhibit 5.A General Location Map Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 34 of 121 Exhibit 5.A __ _ _._ _ r _ — N UVLLLlV,�7Cs : UNIT 44 UNI a � Tr e - W ce €.. Ll U O .r fL ..........r � ..T:� $ - w ,„g „„ Y O GOLDEN GATE ESTATES GOLDEN GATE ESTATES :N GATE GOLDEN GATE £STf.TES GOLDEN tATES UNIT 59 UNIT 60 UNIT 63 Uh IT 38 w -J n_ z --- Q ORANGETREE ti i'20 T �� �T 0 1 ORANGE BLOSSOM >� pr4'1 RANCH :N GATE �' W W ' ORANGE BLOSSOM GOLDEN GATE EST/TES TATS g GOLDEN G RANCH UNIT 64 Uri )T 36 � y` pl OIL WELL ROAD L C.R.858 ORANGE BLOSSOM EVANGELICAL�� W ( ) RANCH LUTHERN Q ORANGETREE CHURCH Q CD W GOLDEN G ESTATES > GOLDEN dR UT 9 U o �( 4 d ORANGETREE RANDALL BOULEVARD'2:k::'''' RANDALL 0 RANDALL BLVD 5 MAR RANDALL W BLVD. CENTER(S) , v GOLDEN GATE ESTATES GOLDEN GATE ESTATES I EN GATE UNIT 25 .[? UNIT 24 N GATE GOLDE G TE E GOLDEN g STATES UNIT 70 u .: s ) $ f mg PROJECT SITE i _ q J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF PROJECT#: 39-12-1 R 23150 FASHION DRIVE,SUITE 242 LATTER-DAY SAINTS S FILE DATE: 9/2012 R ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 (GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH) PHONE:(239)273-3996 DESIGN BY: DCH N � FAX:(239)288-2537 GENERAL LOCATION MAP SEC 19,20,29,30 TWN 48 5 RNG 28 E WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM DAN C.HARTLEY P.E. FL.COA#29226 SCALE: N.T.S. FL.LICENSE 8:73943 Page 35 of 121 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Exhibit 5.B Aerial Map Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 36 of 121 Exhibit 5_B . Ft ! 0 50' 100' • ` ., Opi li . 0! v * SCALE: 1" = 100' .T l' ` N Ii _ . : �I 1 '° # ...4. ii. ., ,• 4*... . ,•s 4 L r'.!310r^- 'ItA%AsAk0.4, w - -Art 4 y 4: .,t , . - ' ---' -- -" - r •,- . _- -„ ,_ ..-..C..- , li ,., A, ,„ xi ,yV * 4 ' ' .‘ .',#' k :S/4i'laf';'''"t a/:".It. '' i . 1y,y\.4•1 , ' '41t.;:... A''''' -1 ../ ,; f 34-'tik 10 1-.1 -.''''''114", *:•-•:-'41:' ,kr. 1 .._ic,)(4 ,, ,ir,.,,It-,,Iv r: ........,e,......: ♦ Ir ' �1 , wA k. r i p:.• $" it'''' '''''.6, 1r,'r >p , ,7ll ; � W ; .4*. - - ,,,- ' 1. . ; -‘ tfii' ',., 4 Si. -' 11. 'ir - V•r; V• 't, -. - ' 1 --I i k..;‘" ..:' • ' J . ,tt''..gam. 'Y j1 1 • I. ' E +',`, ` f et. t�, '14. --a t i .:. 4 -4' ,.. -4. ,F ° K Iv L ' - li *msr• k' "' Ai*.g „. f ., °. `r 1 ..gip . IL-' A..- 4 4 - ** 1 .4°.4 ' 'a* ' .. isi 4t. '4 Pk. I t......: , # ,,, , . RANDALL BLVD t w .. " w ``x =. PROJECT T y `' ,k � b 4 SITE 1 , ••AERIAL'COLLIER COUNTY 2012 URBAN 6 IN. 1 i„ ,, -774'. ;„it J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF PROJECT#: 39-12-1 23150 FASHION DRIVE,SUITE 242 LATTER-DAY SAINTS FILE DATE: 9/2012 ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 (GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH) ''' AllZ PHONE:(239)273-3996 DESIGN BY: DCH FAX:(239)288-2537 AERIAL MAP SEC 19,20,29,30 TWN 48 5 RNG 28 E W W W.JREVANSENGIN EERING.COM ��- DAN C.HARTLEY P.E. FL COA#29226 SCALE: 1”=100' FL LICENSE#:73943 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 37 of 121 Exhibit 5.0 Land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 38 of 121 Exhibit 5.0 1 - 1__ 18 18 17 17 16 Ll 24-119 1910 20 an u c 1 8 lissignimilosi F3t7®IIiiii82iiifli i O to lll® 9Q Sig E!!I!!!!!! !11 II 6 22 27 38 3 54 59 70 75 86 U 102107 • 30 PROJECT SITE ® 1,l ®® iiiiiii 1 U;9 hO® ` 37 44 53 60 69 ��52�� �k0a 1•- 40218 �� �molialifflairar® 53 60 6 6 85 92 101 t az�, 1 1 3- im m� WELLFIELD CONE OF 3 NS le11310 EIPUIMENNIM110 I'M ®P; 43 54 59 . 91 s 1. EIME 3 25.�mm® :1� il wiii r.0!;© ®j®®©® jmiii ■ i 114 I 2 72 ' 1 16 17 32 33 48 49 64 65 80 81 96 97 11 101111101124 25 40 41 56 57 3 73 88 89 04 105120 21 1 1 7.3 MIME 11911111111 80 mil 93,in 2254111E 110!!!!! H! • 6® 10 .®!!!! ! l4 1I 1 B ®®similijji1) 91 j� IMEN1110 11512:II 11 m 101 106® 20 • }1®20 9 i!i imiii108 119 rnii50ii10 '5511 12 I Y,■ 118 6 .r 1102 86 t I a 25 3 14 19 30 35 46 51 62 67 7 83 94 99„on. ©22 38 43 54 59 70 7 + •1 ...‘107 at (3 1' R 36�.��2AEEIM®ll ill 55 illidli.�406ji a i 1 2 M i 1 8 mis diri®m�mmm®ohE l;�m®40INMEN51811 1 limmiloira 110! IIM raillato!! !!!!!!;II' W -!. minigillini107® 140inniiil10n i .:11 ji ?, T, a . 5!!!!!!u OIL 106® gl 20!!! !!! !!!I'S 1' NOTES: 4 ®II MEIMMIII NE1IMI�FI©fIIr•.• 120 I 1311E 60 williii i,r i'l 1) ALL AREAS WITHIN 300 FEET OF 1t8 �®e�� . 70 NI, . , t BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE 117 WITHIN BASE ZONING E(ESTATES) 16 ®�������� �� I I: 2) PORTION OF PROPERTY LIES WITHIN 15 © _i WELLFIELD CONE OF INFLUENCE ST/W-4 114 1 m. monimu ingui 3) IMAGE TAKEN FROM COLLIER COUNTY " Nu®®mimun Yir oo 88 um sry dice a BASE ZONING MAP NUMBER GGE08 6 5 r r� 5 4,` 9 J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF PROJECT#: 39-12-1 0 231.50 FASHION DRIVE,SUITE 242 LATTER-DAY SAINTS FILE DATE: 9/2012 R ■ ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 (GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH) PHONE:(239)273-3996 DESIGN BY: DCH FAX:(239)288-2537 BASE ZONING MAP SEC 19,20,29,30 TWN 48 5 RNG 28 E 3 WWWJREVANSENGINEERING.COM DAN C.HARTLEY P.E. FL COA X 29226 SCALE: N.T.S. FL.LICENSE#:73943 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 39 of 121 Exhibit 5.D Existing FLUM with Project Location and Acreage Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 40 of 121 F xh i bit 5.-Q_ GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE LAND USE MAP IMMOKALEE ROAD EXISTING F.L.U.M. DESIGNATION 1719 N ESTATES DESIGNATION H MIXED USE DISTRICT 7.80 ACRES RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT N z A Ix Q > w OIL WELL ROAD a L it 0 0::1 ......el IMMOKALEE ROAD Z I--_ RANDALL BOULEVARD 0 to o a x 3 J PROJECT SITE N U L GOLDEN GATE ,__ BOULEVARD ! ,E, 5 BLVD. U IA W a s ESTATES DESIGNATION o o 'MIXED USE DISTRICT a O U RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT I VD L) C) u1 U J J.R.EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF PROJECT#: 39-12-1 0 23150 FASHION DRIVE,SUITE 242 LATTER-DAY SAINTS FILE DATE: 9/2012 c.' ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 (GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH) PHONE:(239)273-3996 DESIGN BY: DCH E, FAX:(239)288-2537 SITE LOCATION / EXISTING i WWWJREVANSENGINEERING.COM GOLDEN GATE AREA FUTURE SEC 19,20,29,30 TWN 48 S RNG 28 E DAN C.HARTLEY P.E. a FL COA#29226 LAND USE MAP SCALE: N.T.S. FL.LICENSE#:73943 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 41 of 121 Exhibit 5.E Aerial Map and summary of native habitats and soils Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 42 of 121 Exhibit 5.E '0A18 S301/19213A3 • co I N t.' ' a r ^b� i a< E : • et Z' ''t f 'v' , ," ��` .. a • ' CO- 1 VF • 1.<t ' ;z; . ? 4 r# �; ,, ,--...t.-,-- y y -, F ,• L >te. '-t :,J '^C I L, 7 , , ' Q vt il U { a ./ . �, 4.1 Q f VO i r Q a? Q 1 � M • 3� ', y, N ,7 . •-.r, }S ,•i-r. •-;.?., ' ..ri co ' .. "-• ,• t W T , .' 41 • . t� N .4" 1�#: i N � , 1•!.Q i �t K.d t'S 1 , •, �'• w. a' '4 '�`, . . NO f'' .1 �,t - ,1 i .� ".-' -"C t �- .t , � �� �'' � .4 3. i,, 40 , `v .. 15.,y : 0 ' i - tit Vk `• Y': �. ' .�.. '• ' J - t 4-,,,,.. ,..t.,4.,,- Q v 1 x ; N tt u. Ca o a. il e - - .. f is-,,,t., t z N - ':�'0 a Y„ S } y .„ � W O O W W W p 2• � � a z z > > > z z st• .z* r r 2,-- W cn "` .,- _ ir. ft, i jot "a F- Cai O ONi - O V j' rn 0 : E al' Uj 0 A 4� -- yK Cr O CO i w O o' O N O O O N r . 7 U 4 L J • -s? tS: •g C dr tz € J A �+ E z s 4 ti o„, C.! p y W n x V i �•. J O m a. Q J m N W o ca <' P 3.1 �J 3 LL o_ 0.- g Q U p 0 z p O i! is Ira' G gr5„ U U _, w WO m O F � ' #� 1 co 3 LL 2 m W Q. U - r 3 x z .c • z v> m a a • _ z : Exhibit 5.F Response to Application Item V.(D)(1) Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 44 of 121 Exhibit 5.F: Response to Application Item V(D)(1) Item V.(D)(1) Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified(commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district?(Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). if so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 91-11.007, F.A.C.) Response: The proposed development will not have significant impact on groundwater resources compared to existing permitted use. The development is proposed to occur over two(2) parcels, currently permitted for single-family homes. The proposed development (church) will have a water usage comparable to or less than the demand generated by two (2) single-family residences, based on F.A.C. usage guidelines for 3-bedroom or 4-bedroom residences(per Chapter 64E-6.008). Impacts to other natural resources such as native vegetation would also be potentially less due to the proposed use versus the existing permitted use. Single-family residences are exempt from native vegetation preservation requirements per Collier County LDC 3.05.07.B, while the proposed use would be subject to minimum criteria. As depicted on the Church's membership maps (Exhibit 4) the property is suitable for the proposed use because of its proximity to church members and because of its corner location fronting on the intersection of two arterial roads. The documents and information provided with the remainder of this application provide additional support data and analyses. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 45 of 121 Exhibit 5.G Response to Application Item V(E)(1) Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 46 of 121 Exhibit 5.G: Response to Application Item V(E)(1) item V. (E) (1) Provide the existing Level of Service Standard(LOS)and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Potable Water The subject property is not located with the Collier County Public Utilities Service Area, nor is it located within the nearby Orange Tree Utility Franchise Area. The project will be serviced potable water via groundwater well (private system). Therefore, the proposed change will have no impact on public potable water facilities. Potable wate calculations for existing conditions (residential - gpd) and proposed change (church/place of worship—gpd). o Existing Conditions (Residential): Potable water flows are assumed to be 10% over the estimated sewage flows. Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for Residences with "4 Bedrooms with 2251-3300 sq. ft. of building area" a sewage flow of 400 gpd is estimated. With the subject project encompassing two (2) residential single-family lots, the total estimated average sewage flow is 800 gpd. Therefore, with an additional 10% to account for potable water flows, the total estimated average potable water flow for existing conditions (residential single-family) is 880 gpd. o Proposed Change (Church/Place of Worship): Potable water flows are assumed to be 10% over the estimated sewage flows. Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for "Churches per seat" a sewage flow of 3 gpd/seat is estimated. With the subject project proposing approximately 230 seats, the total estimated average sewage flow is 690 gpd. Therefore, with an additional 10% to account for potable water flows, the total estimated average potable water flow for proposed conditions (church/place of worship) is 759 gpd. Sanitary Sewer The subject property is not located with the Collier County Public Utilities Service Area, nor is it located within the nearby Orange Tree Utility Franchise Area. The project will be serviced sanitary sewer via septic tank and drain field (private system). Therefore, the proposed change will have no impact on public sanitary sewer facilities and/or treatment facilities. Sanitary Sewer calculations for existing conditions (residential - gpd) and proposed change (church/place of worship—gpd). o Existing Conditions (Residential): Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for Residences with "4 Bedrooms with 2251-3300 sq. ft. of building area" a sewage flow of 400 gpd is estimated. With the subject project encompassing two (2) residential single-family lots, the total estimated average sewage flow for existing conditions (residential single-family) is 800 gpd. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 47 of 121 o Proposed Change (Church/Place of Worship): Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for "Churches per seat" a sewage flow of 3 gpd/seat is estimated. With the subject project proposing approximately 230 seats, the total estimated average sewage flow is 690 gpd. Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS The existing Level of Service Standard for both Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard is LOS D. Currently, Everglades Boulevard is operating at LOS B and Randall Boulevard is operating at LOS D. The change in use will not degrade the operating level of service of either road. That is, Everglades Boulevard will continue to operate at LOS B and Everglades Boulevard will continue to operate at LOS D. Drainage As defined in the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan, the following Level of Service (LOS) standard is adopted for future "private" developments: "water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinance Numbers 74-50, 90-10 and 200127, and Land Development Code Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended." All new public and private construction is required by county ordinance (i.e. Land Development Code) to adhere to the current regulations of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), which provide standard minimum water quality and quantity regulations. Additionally, Collier County Ordinance 2001-27 provides more restrictive maximum discharge rates, as specified by geographic boundaries. The subject property is located within the Main Golden Gate Canal Basin (as identified in the Collier County Drainage Subbasins Map), which per Ordinance 2001-27, has a maximum allowable off-site discharge rate of 0.15 cfs/acre (computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency). The proposed project will adhere to regulations of the South Florida Water Management District, approved Collier County Ordinances and Land Development Code, and therefore will be in compliance with the Collier County LOS standards for Stormwater Management (Drainage). Solid Waste As defined in the Solid Waste Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan, the LOS standard for Solid Waste Disposal Facilities is: (1) Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous three years, and (b)Ten years of permittable landfill capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous three years. Per the Public Utilities Division's 2011 Annual Update and Inventory Report(AUIR),the Solid Waste AUIR projects that the Collier County Landfill will have sufficient capacity until FY 2042. As noted in the 2011 AUIR, the 2010 AUIR projected that the landfill would have adequate capacity only until 2039. The "gained" capacity for the 2011 AUIR reflects initiatives that have increased recycling and decreased disposal(as well as reductions in population estimates). Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 48 of 121 The proposed project will contain recycling containers in an effort to reduce disposal waste and promote recycling. Additionally, since solid waste LOS standards are based on a per capita tonnage, and the proposed project will not generate a population increase, the proposed project will have no impact on the solid waste disposal capability of Collier County. Parks: Community and Regional As defined in the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Growth Management Plan, the LOS standard for Community Parks is 1.2882 acres/1,000 population, and the LOS standard for Regional Parks is 2.9412 acres/1,000 population. The 2011 County Parks and Recreation Facilities AUIR projects a 5-year surplus of 82.93 acres of Community Park Land (Category A) and a 5-year surplus of 66.32 acres of Regional Park Land (Category A). The proposed project will have no impact on Collier County's community or regional park facilities. 6207790v1 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 49 of 121 Exhibit 5.H Public Facilities Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 50 of 121 Exhibit 5.H — UNIT 44 21 .c11U–wN11 J Lu U 1 W In o F- ¢ .F- O O IL' z W W QJQ O GOLDEN GATE ESTATES GOLDEN GATE ESTATES :N'GATE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES GOLDEN UNIT 59 UNIT 60 S FATES UNIT 63 UN T 38 W J 0_ Z ORANGETREE q % II O ORANGE COLLIER COUNTY BRLOSSOr SHERIFF'S SUBSTATION EN GATE W 1195 OIL WELL RD. .DEN GATE ESTATES GOLDEN u: FATES 3.43 MILES UNIT 6E4 STATES T 36 0 I OIL VL ROAD OIL WELL ROAD Q h (C.R.858) EMMANUEL �-- ' c ORANGE BLOSSOM EVANGELICAL — c.c.) RANCH LUTHERN Q ORANGETREE CHURCH • LL N GATE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES > GOLDEN ; 'ATES UNIT 69 W U T 22 I ORANGETREE RANDALL !BOULEVARD RANDALL `..., f RANDALL BLVD c -M R RANDALL BLVD. CENTERS) BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND W %` FIRE/RESCUE STATION 10 EN GATE ESTATES S DEN GATE 13240 IMMOKALEE RD. UNIT 25 G g ;STATES GOLDEN GATE ESTATES GOLDEN INIT 23 3.46 MILES UNIT 70 L t PROJECT • SITE J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF PROJECT#: 39-12-1 0 23150 FASHION DRIVE,SUITE 242 LATTER-DAY SAINTS _ ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 (GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH) FILE DATE: 1/2013 PHONE:(239)273-3996 DESIGN BY: DCH 6 FAX:(239)288-2537 EMERGENCY SERVICES i'< WWW.JREVANSENGINEERING.COM SEC 19,20,29,30 TWN 48 S RNG 28 E LOCATION DAN C.HARTLEY P.E. FL.COA 8 29226 SCALE: N.T.S. FL.LICENSE#:73943 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 51 of 121 Exhibit 5.1 FEMA FIRM 12021CO245H Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 52 of 121 Exhibit 5.1 6 /----- r € L Qx nN ai I14 Wd j z agn W��� .,- i E g E ix - C .,:t c� wzv N N lit z��� QN QQ � PHI II O N U /� < NtA�n S� 11!- R m m O J Z 4� CL f` r. W m s,^ W r zen r, S Efi II Z = L) 2 LL i+X ;PP aE r$ i ! j!;! �``Z CO J N 2 f r E o a 222555 t °n ... yp ( Wj Fix v ►a Q w r� ,f d uv W Ll ;W!it l W L i O a } - - �, E {I II C s pis 1 aai �i @== A avir� a ar�� c.i i � =m i a a� LL.. _� , W b'2� `0�Jld ���N-d-2�s(I�S NII Al®'0 0=1�_�`d N 41=1-d N- f �� II { ,s.;i 'Y§'„;N:: s R 5; 7, Y +Jr +iR "Jk ® tR4 a � A a '" -.1� -•,.y Y ® ro `i" K� ' aS. � {,F YW ��a" J ,,..r.;7.,-..:3,..1....,..D ky.'.� 4A �a S°4s1�R¢!S .--°,-, !b F� ��°� b •�yt�' #��J (� li g ♦ � ., :-. S 1` S a >'4,.ro ,. S r.. a 4q '""'Jy#r a.°j +:5l •'�'?" x, i hf 3 e c ai A $J k s a�aa _ a a 'Y,° h s a6 ... .."."°.."•''::.: ': j(u '`i,:. t S Y ;3. •% a*ata°eau R ® . a�jzia rarv,*-'-. JY t:ia& a V �' i a s z.,%a ' ° . ,#. ., ,A ,A,. q+ s .�#; a-g-J^4 v a#$a ra +. s a x s 3s w . 134(,:%!.07.:i.:*.:*:'*: yp. :g ,�} ; F, r a a s. S q a , n '.,'•.:',. k:. f k t �' � ;x u@ # &dr3 8 4 L R Y� a^ > 9`l } R As7 �C. tas J .*,,,,°.' +ae x s t is.: 3 ss. +.k a w d s 3 # t+ a J .,»R s' t Al��'i. I N + 44; Y f .."4 ta" fix'`+:' .le a ero �. � �i��P��tt__ 1y{',I , °t 1#414100,144:i4. a°'�y b- ro$' Ats J4%4 to +r n# `S a ��,'' i, '*£1.14441/1114:30°4 f s"s J ,..g: s t> ate s �t ,eft E e � F &a ro t t \t � s s . s b 'a 4' 7:44.-4,.'%'4 ■ _ d *t F u s �' i a !� x !i S s A �. a � f iia 3�„a,aa . x. e � �, 9 k t �� �' �at . a rrsr i s+s. � F y '� 'sAJ♦ r �'fit a .***g41:47.:°'M � �. s w 3 a� e t°'>; �' :�� ys'J a ��y $ `° , 7 ''f,V}J pT A ♦ a e b . s``•" #+b ! fA 2 d}a a♦ �. 7„,.0...* '.& '3� S o- 5. r� > ; fie` a,e! ap rs......a y, d we 't✓44 M -i<aa #Yrn 1• t stt �, a3.* S tv# •!'° �. 4s d . ^iL • ttt .;,,d *� ady,,, '^ S � P e3 Gila yedt 'a il+ ` ,{+Y � °':‘:°•:': f ss � .:','*1.4.,,,J ` 1:--„At a4< * x i e a f .K' 1i. "+ ,0 1F 4 e 2 �4Ka Y Y fi � ♦ Q fSi � �a� e ,°, � i'-‘'-':=;':'-'.,f a �3lkJ+ »-.m�°t"xt ��, ?+ ! !r>` ,�4 - A�� 1144$1;4.1`4),g�ra*E t et'{� ":':•,`:,•:°:°°,a A . le we♦ a 4 a -sue eJW, y7 a; ''3k' '4 's:a "xe,:,.:.,:%'.:.,:%:,J . 5 ,`rent: 1: 4 s:v . Jr S 41,*4�. a.vr, 0,',; J ti�':, 'i •a S ' ,.. 6 s t r a s e It:;-:°.'''''2,1::.5 Ji� i; ,e� r , .• 4 3 3 v 3 r . .t S ;E 4 a 4:4:4'64;1114.60,4:44:4::4; x a r ../-:-.'...',-'%.*',`°. `n x+'+ k H , 3 a"`o o f : 3•i a �P d� i 41,....„,„...:.og):*...4. s a Y m ^a` 6 1 • sas eJie•` t $i 4�' Eb >�'i , ' ;pia J o- J . .,$•t J. wa.: 3S ,r s 'a., , s ! . s a <,a'ar , , J$} A sate "!Je°� °# i . .. & ,�,rx- g a � c # M' a � �'S y >i Ala+y¢, r � �«� �s �: Y a Uses 4a ro e � �5 J°,fd ♦ k «'y n i�i yt #Ik ��lt� 5, - y R 4 rf� f e.'.' .'-''. t,tl E iJnil ! l ;, r K!Y v `�a '� 4 1.:::....7 ::..; .:*a { �i*:1 •*ar.**# '*, a " : J .t a g'. r a r k o a •1s rqF nc�#+ k a, + s w n J � r°%:::: a a`* y7r" s #t..., �f :y+���d 2 � .. ii�� at-,ti'�:�'aaa � � . „+r � J �°S . stYA4 t! �' 3 d -' Tt iA e�`?s Y�. N S-_�i-#.y+t : O !: : . # �t Qx •. };s�'st!4' is�tt +Q� a4�,c�''� id`s�S,tiS`-F sit,3 .. � ro " � >.��W� f�3 1.,:.:::::.0.....,:::::::::...:.}::a r s Q t t.}ap.y:��. aw 4 v " ',,'�9 t,y.4..>1L�s fe�,i.#ts ��pp f q_y„,a - {tk s en a — U Jt ix .tiul *t :*s s�'r�a $ :: 9 J J F;: ' : «i Q t d++i if it Iy at E a .e s R a A } ,'uY. iii R� '£ fi�'F t- �?e A +��� �! Yr,J• re r t .t re2 f--- to Yee :'r ->f x �� '� ' W -x+,�s s�i �� ,,� � i "�+Z � 4 s J : ! X ..:, :. - i t �e. 1,e„ s..: s 3 `0:$.4...,:_i: : J .. 1>s �+ . r' i U AJ3lf a, at t N+1b a , ,,;.rn af di$ °+ >,eS�ra3YW ' a�!t !de r v; x `e� W s �i�u d a� �� a � E q k 3 � ::::%:::::.^::!t a K a 4 s M A. 'x'a i a d d 3 ,. : a t 5 .'' 3 e �� a� "y • a t � w� :a l a t 3 S t'+.w a e.^� a t m t s •�5 ! `��' ? W,� Ja +� �, x:>4 .��aa, xpt t a� s v� 3tJ �e. 3J..� s "leZ$ `i if y ere:lad Jf t o P.,z n #Y a A! !Ja b i a 3 3 ! ,��$4 �i !�?+A � r�ijSe b a:t a �.i✓ 3 a {a y J>E `i J 'a : t �.s J 7 y .:! . A : z.ate"‹ _i 'i',;,a .i:e.:s t'N :.:7: `# : :a a kr x .. F:At . a s a e 1.P&e .r .a 2 H a 3 3 b-. . , t t4a i o ta. 3 � t is`,v a a t a� �:r v ro �°ae� ;si ai� Q � f �. ,3«f t ::::1:.::::::::.*.'� s{ - }F' �.:�` �>1� r . �dj qr � ..a" s �.• #9�rrg3e�.i �{y.1 `y" a y v t $::::'::°:**t H 44.„41-:"a ls:i $3*�.'-$' ` ,11;y>44. .77°.-'�{c `a s .. ','. j ':*. d W t ".:'ar**X i ` .. '* 5 *''* *.�e111 y' S 3'MM'ill g . �..a __ — ..i��ii, t �a e vs-..,..1°,...N.", sr v I er lr � �' A >_1J ��l i�;: +e: ii-.rp ,d J J JstJ �. `4iq { g 4 . 4 ._.•p'�3 as#�� >l�� a: „� � � � °11'iJ e � �t a S s s >�ror' .�3 + ly.-1-..x, r J# a ♦ A'3 J ' ° ' };F #a s .. «3 JR J, r '"a .;z�t�s„ t � � !i �§y ;� . _}�.a �•Y $�' d” �tc !3 3 Ae �� a W3'S! .f� v 5 x: ' °.ii"" � d P� a aS is + ` e *. �". Y ie ',•'. •, e �?� %-`.:%:24,t, b�t�aa __�?% 6«�. Y '..o."‘"-..".,".did♦ S« ! JJ W....*at � y • ". a a> P a ♦ + ..,p.. ! °g.±., r ats'� J %t:k*a e 1+, !#y sa : x F • e .of.,."","�3y6, „W .t t r4M. ii �,g iii .wed*J 'Os ro. as ..a q• a i3'. § "a �t3e .Ja ''I � • ti+r : ! N y + e»s: +rte+S .. e�f. M s 3 1° .Y s pre J��• '$ * s.p"$': ! *tr„a .c s.q r , ° �'�/ y¢[jgg p. • n''c', J t#J*"....k . A"kf �•" " s .J. Y t�' ^afF.QR a A ! P i :' ,r;.'„'Z.:::**'N**-..". .i� J sJ e :'.7„."*.'::' bHd�IIE �J t 3 . •y F s; f �J a i•d *;.::::::;*.f. s J J� 3 e a °i J 1A & 1.4.4::::',::'....''♦� 'C• s s e 9 !J ��, !*=*:', ....e«�{'.,*4t.a , -»5,, Nd hs aa5: r aw�Y.s.,�', ' .. b" > . . n _ >. . .' . `9.s'.4G II'!� h Growth Management Plan Application CPSS 2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 53 of 121 Exhibit 5.J Deeds Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 54 of 121 Exhibit 5.J INSTR 4736141 oR 4832 PG 200. RECORDED 9/5/2012 7g:30 41A PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. 13R0CK, CLERK Of THE CIRCUIT Cdi1RT, COLLIER COUNTY FLO1tiDA Doc 0.70 $2g.0.0.0 RE:C 527.00 cO1s $40,000.00 'Pm/NW Lcupnrle., rp,00 employee(.f 19 i 29TiUeiilurokdtompany �f00TatrilbnitTraI Natti Naples,HMO 39103 (87#133-M9 Property fi 5005902 itetum ongMal(econled;dpcvment to: 1 thurcfi lt��'aal E"tale Div%ston i2114 F104 Eakt' •So kast'Noith Temple Sattleke Gty;(11 04150 rind Send Tan Knt to to; • 5sQ:ChuolQrh 1oxAdiednIstritior 5b k9t�''11gr91 Temple- ;itak�at�,UFe4io•36i0. � . • file Pm 08+2616651 ;T:. This lridenture:made en 3une 1 .11y/ • •Atbatto Flernandez whose;address Is ;i 80.2,Qtti;Av, ,Nap:it 5i 1 L 3412' befelnaftei-called the"gr;atd0;to © <S. Corporation of The Presiding Bishop of ecsk tir O1gsus Ftitist Of Latter-day Satnts,a Utah cbrlsat ati.dri site: t 4 ose.address Is:. t)East North i'emple,2"3th Ftbtir/'Salt tL ke:tity,UT hereinafter called the".graittee.":. (S pkt Ientis'Grentorani"Grahtte`shai lincludestriguIarcrp'urat,rarporatloner.)sdMiduel,:andeithersex/pn4shaltlricimIeheirs,legs( 1ep esdntaWe's, cessorsand esitgnsofthe sato Witliessetli,;ttiat the gr.Otgri for and In consideration of.the sum of T'en Dollars,I$10 00)end ether ■a(tieble constdderationst;receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,herebyyralitS,bat'galos; I(s,aliens, remises,reteases,conveys ti toiiflrnis unto the grantee,ell trial certa(a.laridLs)tuate'In oll(er Coijnty, F7gfida;'to-wit, East150.feet of Teed NO,.1t.6rof GOI.pEITCATi:ESTl1,TES-t1NIT.NO{69,110000E to the Plat thereof,@s recorded in PlatBo'pk 7,1 4:Page 65,of the Public Reeorda a'f:Cgllief C.claity;Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 402430E0001 !04-25]6652 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 55 of 121 or 4832 PG 2051 The land Is not-the homestead of the Grantor under the laws anti•constitution Of Ale State of Florida'arid neither the Grantor nor any person(sf.for whose support the Grantor Is responsible reside on or adjacent. •"to!baked, Su i)ect•to all reservations,covenants,conditions,restrictions!and"easeh tints of racord and.toal) applicable zoning ordinances and/or restrictlOns fmposed by governmental authorliles,if any. Together with all the tenements;'hereditameritsand appurtenances thereto belonging or In any way tt jipertainIng. TO..F(aYY arid"to mold/the same In(PPP"' .1= oOy A,"" " And the.granter hereby.coveaaotsv: it.,+"tante:that . 'Islat/11(11y,seized of saldland In:fee tifigle;thatthe graptgr haS good _ d lawful adthorityto s .a'q. ••hvey saij hands that the grantor hgr by:tplty yrarrants the tItie to id •:Feld; tt sam••aga st•:the lawful claims of ail persons whomsoever:and that a1d}.n of�t tine ,rances- ceE taxes accruing subsequentto Decethbl'r3lstof2011. -1- Ir)Wttngs$Wheret,f,the g .ri r■. tt--i q.r se•, ' 'diti i a .; ;(9)the day and year first eboV2 Written: ... .i0. ::.(00,0•40*°"..-1-‘k:.:.16-1•-e.:'05'. Aibiarto Hemhri.8x $fg/ic- •seal- antidellvered In tier m eh ': WitnessSlgiiz rite • WIt(re'sSignature Print Name:.4 OU..Y,yi1 _y i 9 F r Pa242 di pat-7416652 • Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 56 of 121 ?*`^ OR 4832 PG 2052 4** State(if FL_ County of Collier The Foivoile'g ItAii'Iineee,t WasAe.ke0Wtedgea.li.ie(oi-e:Me on lung ,;i4}2,by Alberto Hamattdez-)hciis)are perstinatty-known tome or who has%have produced a valici'driverslicense.as Identification. RU' „tLr otary puWk £o Atnz nor f; +: L0n M1n��E EHaan fir' ':� itoury roubi'e,stEatot hot* fbrinfedHann) LI Ccatm.fi" d r13y.201i o• r• a ( 4t1, ' .,•;rr tmm14.11 [ :.4718. 4•t.n.d• F»:eglMeV:hlirltap#lA3fotyAsi4-.• MV.Commission exp7re : '•rl3 'r Q rratort'alsea3 •21za .-k IOTA-26160.2 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 57 of 121 INSTIL 4741096 OR 4836 PG 3284 RECORDED 9/19/2012 9:51 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DoC(i.70 $653.10 REC $27.00 CONS $93,300.00 Prepared by Louanne Ehorn,an employee of First American Title Insurance Company 5000 Tamiami Trail North Naples,Florida 34103 (877)333.1754 Property# 500-5402 Return Original Recorded Documnet to: LDS Church Real Estate Division 12th Floor East 50 Est North Tample Salt Lake City Utah 84150 and Send Tax Notice to: LDS Church Tax Administration 22nd Floor 50 East North Temple ,[ COG' Salt Lake City Utah 84150-3620 - A.} .------""- Fite No.:1084-2620089 VTARRAN-TY_D:EED )42)\!--, This indenture made on Se to b p _Richard F. Berman,a single pe \and Frank J. Cel k eisnak, husband and wife \*q. whose address is: 611 1st Street SW 41a�tes,_. L 3,4],14 hereinafter called the"grantor",to (''..—„1/F c1\— Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,a Utah corporation sole whose address is: 50 E. North Temple St., 22nd Floor,Salt Lake City,UT 84150 hereinafter called the"grantee": (Which terms'Grantor"and"Grantee"shall include singular or plural,corporation or individual,and either sex,and shat include heirs,legal representatives,successors and assigns of the same) Witnesseth,that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00)and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells,aliens, remises, releases,conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, to-wit: All of Tract 115, Unit 69 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 65,of the public Records of Collier County, Florida. Page 1 of3 19:4-2620089 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 58 of 121 OR 4836 PG 3285 Parcel Identification Number: 40243040007 Subject to all reservations,covenants, conditions,restrictions and easements of record and to all applicable zoning ordinances and/or restrictions imposed by governmental authorities,if any. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any way appertaining. To Have and to Hold,the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with id'!��iLatlif► ra for is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the grantor has good right i,l s�ifut au 1noricy I d convey said land;that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to saf1l r• an-d will defend the ca••inst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;and that sa' Ia • is freeiall encumbranc ex•-pt taxes accruing subsequent to December 31st of 2011. ia—� In Witness •f,the graOp e •n o e t •' a c( ` - sea(s)the day and year first above w • en n • , tk Richard . B, an 't' 0 r. (, 'Signed,se led and delivered in our , P - e re7��.I�..--- _jT�P � • (�„ � ,-� �;i' // I, -, Witness Signature Witness -4 nature •lPrint Name: Lb 4 A h n e E h b ) Print Name: / ip f1 a l yi i / full State of FL • County of Collier The Foregoing Instrument Was Acknowledged before me on September ? ,2012,by Richard F.Berman,a single person who is/are personally known to me or who has/have produced a valid driver's license as identiffickation. • Notary Public ^''4''4 !r r'^r-., =/.7„:„....k""" NE ENORfI -✓�i.—%'y;$.114., d,1:vl J:- •State of flsrid3 ires Apr 13,2015 (Printed Name) n#EE 69318 i/"/3--),( !Miens!t::try Assn. My Commission expires: {nrororialSeal) Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 59 of 121 *** OR 4836 PG 3286 *** 01"----- P10EL 10 - ` : 4OZ9 309D0D7 4 2 7 .1,,t_42_1 • . 4 ,dZe-'11 —7147C MJ CI ak Frank J.Celsnak - igned,sealed:nd deli d In•ur presence: / 1. _ .'i 11.1k_ e' -, --:.,..� / ' .S ess Sig :ture , I! ry,\l;", +T►`. 7s}6g�ra re // Print Name: ' 1 II -r r 46 er Print Name: �1lk-:,>1-G A*012 'ti3, t State of G ifr 0. (/ _-'ti County of i.. t M R\ The Foregoing Instrument ?s,A 41 - a a e oLS-.t=mb r 5 ,2012,by Frank 3.Celsnak and M3 Cal a husband and wife o Is/- e a- Iiy-known to me or who has/have produced a valid drive .4r se as identification. -1.., .-- + 0 Notary Pug ic 0��` _ p-- - 1__ i'111::.' C 11� 'v _____. AMY MORLOCK 1-x"/''/1 (--( 44 Q r!oc-k' ; Notary Public J (Printed Name) ( State of Idaho My Commission expires: .. - 7 Co ° I g {Notorfel Seat) Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 60 of 121 Exhibit 5.K Listed Species and FL Master Site File Correspondence Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 61 of 121 Exhibit 5.K THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY LDS CHURCH JANUARY 2013 PREPARED BY: TURRELL,HALL&ASSOCIATES,INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE,STE B NAPLES,FL 34104 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 62 of 121 LDS CHURCH SEC 19 TWP 48s RNG 28E COLLIER COUNTY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY JANUARY 2013 INTRODUCTION The project site consists of approximately 7.80 acres located in section 19, township 48 S, and Range 28 E of Collier County, Florida. The proposed project consists of constructing a church, associated parking lot, and the required water management storage areas. The project is located on the northwest corner of Randall Blvd and Everglades Blvd, in the Golden Gate Estates. The project site consists of approximately 7.80 acres that is bordered to the north and west by single-family residences, to the east by Everglades Blvd, and to the south by Randall Blvd. Of the 7.80 total acres, 2.56 acres consists of wetland habitat and 5.24 acres of upland habitat. To consider potential effects of the proposed project on any state or federally listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting, a Threatened and Endangered Species Survey was performed and is described in the following report. II. METHODOLOGY Prior to any wildlife survey, careful consideration is given to the habitat type/s in question and species that are known to utilize such areas. Thus, before any survey is carried out a number of publications and references are consulted. These include: The Official Lists of Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, dated April 29, 1996, Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (FGFWFC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, Survey Protocol for SFWMD projects, Collier County aerial research, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any wildlife survey is to obtain evidence that a listed species is using the subject site. The site may comprise a primary or secondary feeding/foraging or nesting zone or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many species of concern in Florida are cryptic/camouflaged and/or nocturnal/crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Aerial photos and a preliminary FLUCFCS map were consulted prior to arriving on-site and a system of meandering transects followed throughout the subject area. The transects were walked during fieldwork that took place between November 2011 to January 2013 and approximately 15 hours have been spent on the site to date devoted to wildlife survey. 2 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 63 of 121 LDS CHURCH SEC I9TWP48S RNG 28E COLLIER COUNTY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY JANUARY 2013 A list of survey dates, times, and ambient weather conditions is provided below. SURVEY TIMES TEMP WIND WEATHER DATE SURVEYED (°F) (MPH) 11/22/11 08:00-12:00 75 5 E Clear 11/28/11 07:30-10:30 74 10-15 SE Partly Cloudy 1/11/13 07:00-11:00 65 5-10 E Mostly Clear 1/15/13 14:30-18:30 78 5-10 SE Clear A slow pace was walked throughout the entire site, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rootings, scrape marks,nests, cavities,burrows,tracks and scat were looked for and noted. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A list of all wildlife species observed on or adjacent to the site is provided below. Common Name Scientific Name Birds Turkey Vulture * Cathartes aura • Reptiles &Amphibians Brown anole Anolis sagrei Mammals Nine-banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus Raccoon(tracks) Procyon lotor Grey Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis * Observed on adjacent properties or flying overhead. A list of protected species that could be expected to occur on the subject site can be given through analysis of known vegetative communities both on-site and contiguous to the site and available background data. Sources include the Fish and Wildlife Service Multi Species Recovery Plan, Part 2, Appendix C, Species of Concern and their Respective Community Types in South Florida, in addition to communication with personnel at state and federal wildlife agencies. Vegetative communities are presented by FLUCFCS codes together with potential listed wildlife species. Consideration of the suitability and likelihood for a given community to support a particular species is given in light of adjacent and contiguous land uses. 3 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 64 of 121 LDS CHURCH SEC 19 TWP 48S RNG 28E COLLIER COUNTY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY JANUARY 2013 Abbreviations used in the discussion are as follows; F= Federal SSC=Florida Species of Special Concern S = State C=Federal Candidate E=Endangered *=FWS Species of Management Concern T=Threatened R=Rare FLUCFCS CODE 411:Pine Flatwood& 624: Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm Appendix C lists the following potential species within the community type Pine Flatwoods and Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm; Florida Weasel (Mustela frenaata peninsulae, R), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia, *), Florida Black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), American Kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus, *, ST), Sandhill crane(Gras canadensis pratensis, ST), Bald eagle(Haliaetus leucocephalus, FT, ST), Red cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis, FE, ST), Audubons crested caracara (Polyborus plancus audubinii, FT, ST), Eastern Indigo snake (Drymarchon corals couperi, FT, ST), Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus, ST), Eastern Beard grass skipper(Atryone arogos arogos,*). Of the above species, none where observed on this parcel or surrounding parcels. FLUCFCS CODE 6414:Maidencane Appendix C lists the following potential species within the community type Marsh; Limpkin (Aramus guarauna SSC), Osprey (Pandion haliaetus, SSC), Great Egret (Casmerodius albus, R), Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerula, SSC), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), Florida Black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), American Kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus, *, ST), Bald eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus, FT, ST), Snowy egret (Egretta thula SSC), and Tricolor(Egretta tricolor SSC), Of the above species, none where observed on this parcel or surrounding parcels. There is a slight possibility for wading birds to utilize the area for foraging when standing water is present; however, the amount of directly adjacent traffic significantly minimizes that potential. 4 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 65 of 121 LDS CHURCH SEC 19 TWP 48s RNG 28E COLLIER COUNTY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY JANUARY 2013 IV. SUMMARY This property contains a small isolated wetland as there are no contiguous wetlands due to the surrounding single-family residences and its location at the intersection of two major throughways. These factors have resulted in a small wetland that is supported by the altered drainage flow of the immediate area. The water quality overall within this area is fair; however runoff from surrounding land uses has contributed to a slight degradation and becomes trapped once on site. Historic drainage changes and other upland disturbances have resulted in an overall change of the surrounding land hydrology. Within the main wetland area the existing pine trees and the few cypress trees are in good health however exotic vegetation has begun to thrive within this habitat and degraded the overall quality. The condition of the subject site has been derogated by exotics, past alterations to hydrology, and the impacts of being within a high traffic area. These issues have drastically reduced the viability of the site as listed species habitat. Investigation of the site throughout the course of this study has shown that the property offers, at best, limited potential utilization for foraging birds and possible transient species. Development of the subject site is not expected to result in detrimental impacts to state or federally listed wildlife species, primarily because past use patterns, surrounding activities, and altered habitats and hydrology which have reduced the sites' ability to support populations of listed species. 5 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 66 of 121 This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a T project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT,provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of 'Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. November 28, 2011 "Florida Master Site Jeff Rogers �-} File Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc. 3584 Exchange Ave., Ste. B Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.643.0166 Email: ieff(d-?turrell-associates.com In response to your inquiry of November 28, 2011,the Florida Master Site File lists no previously recorded cultural resources in the following section of Collier County: T48S R28E Section 19 When interpreting the results of this search,please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites,historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws,you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, AttAl,f Zan Rothrock Archaeological Data Analyst Florida Master Site File Oscar.Rothrock@DOS.MyFlorida.com 500 South Bronough Street• Tallahassee,FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph 850.245.6439 fax ( SiteFile@dos.state.fl.us Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 67 of 121 Florida Site M. Fade • Florida Master Site File-TRS Search Preliminary Investigation of Previously Recorded Cultural Resources To request a search for previously recorded cultural resources,fill in the Township (circle North or South),Range(circle East or West), &Section number(s) of your project area and fax to 850-245-6439. Also include a photocopy of the appropriate USGS quad map with your project area clearly marked. Township(North or ): Lg , Rang((a#or West):Z?) , Section(include all affected): tq Township(North or South): Range(East or West): , Section(include all affected): Township(North or South): , Range(East or West): Section(include all affected): Township(North or South): Range(East or West): , Section(include all affected): Township(North or South): Range(East or West):_ Section(include all affected): (Searches generating more than 10 pages of material will be returned by US mail) Return To: NAME: TeSc 9 1-3 ORGANIZATION: rc�.{! Pct(j . a,;c{-es DATE: JL/u- /zo ti FAX#: 739- GLIB-44,3z. PHONE#: 739-6143-01 k, ADDRESS: S'g q CA.dvily. Au, Mc4 f)to 9 FL ?ilia,/ P:\FSF\DOCS\MOM\MOM DOCS\TRSREQUEST.DOC Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 68 of 121 Exhibit 5.L Transportation Impact Statement Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 69 of 121 Exhibit 5.L JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTA1ION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For GOLDEN GATE WARD LDS CHURCH (Randall Boulevard Everglades Boulevard) Yd April 24, 2014 C x Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 76 1 2 1 et STREET NW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 20 (239) 919-2767 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 27830 (PROJECT No. 1 1 1 1 131 JAME BANKS, P.E. DATE FLORI,,'RED. No. 43860 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 70 of 121 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Purpose of Report 2 Methodology Meeting 2 Scope of Project 3 Table A 3 Site Plan 3.1 Figure 1 - Location Map/Road Classification 3.2 Project Generated Traffic 4 Table B 4 Table 1 -New Trip Generation Computations 4.1 Existing+Committed Road Network 5 Table 2A -Area of Impact/Road Classification 5.1 Project Generated Traffic Distribution 6 Figure 2A - Project Generated Traffic Distribution 6.1 Figure 2B- Project Traffic Distribution 6.2 Area of Significant Impact 7 Table 2A- Area of Impact/Road Classification 7.1 2011 thru 2015 Project Build-out Traffic Conditions 8 Site Access Turn Lane Evaluation 8 Table 2B-2013. & 2016 Link Volumes 8.1 Table 2C-2016 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 8.2 Appendix 9 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 71 of 121 Conclusions Road Impact Mitigation Requirements Based upon the findings and conclusions of this report, it was determined that Golden Gate Ward LDS Church will not have a significant impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways and intersections, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed worship center,and the network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for 2016 project build-out conditions. Furthermore,the report concludes that the project will not create any transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Site-Related Roadway Improvements Turn Lane- It was determined that an ingress left deceleration/turn lane will not be warranted at the project's access on Randall Boulevard or Everglades Boulevard during weekday traffic conditions,but will be warranted for Sunday service events. That is, weekday AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes will be less than 5 vehicles/hour turning left into the site at either access;but during Sunday peak hour conditions it will be between 30 to 35 vehicles. Because left turn lane warrants are only satisfied for a one-hour event on Sunday, a waiver to the turn lane requirement has been granted by Collier County. Purpose of Report This report was prepared pursuant to the criteria set forth by the Traffic impact Statement Guidelines for site development plan approval (SDP)as set forth by the Collier County Government. More specifically, the study examines the potential transportation related impacts that may occur as a result of completing the proposed construction of the Golden Gate Ward LDS Church. Methodology Meeting Because this project is a low traffic generator during weekday peak hour conditions and its off-site traffic impacts were determined to be negligible,a methodology meeting was not deemed necessary. During the pre-application meeting,Collier County staff granted a waiver to the required methodology meeting and the fee. 7 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 72 of 121 Scope of Project The Golden Gate Ward LDS Church is a proposed worship center that will have a worship hall, administrative offices and auxiliary uses that will be housed in a 20,000 square foot structure. The worship hall will provide a typical seating capacity of 230 seats.The 7.5 +1-acre site is located on the northwest corner of Randall Boulevard @ Everglades Boulevard. The project is proposing to construct one(I) full access on Randall Boulevard and one(1)full access on Everglades Boulevard.For further details, refer to the site development plans prepared by J.R. Evans Engineering,Y.A. TABLE A Size or Capacity Worship l call,Administrative 20,000 s.f. Offices& Auxiliary Uses Typical Seating Capacity 230 Seats 3 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 73 of 121 i i Ir't 1i AWACENT IoN4NC! t }�1 1 0,4 oa to F i ,., ( t -�~ crus'-b.": -—-1' if I I Nmlo I to I 1, ( -- ._, = —7.., ---idiJne 4,, Mk ot,--,..74r..,„ ,... ..,,,,,_ _______ ii i 1. l''':::ir:,,,,- ,..:,,' ;,,i,.':-.—k.„;;;;;,'',:::; 5�' IL :tf1 I 1 li i V etaiw F ?hi 1 ° 'T l ,..4:::, ',1' $p gg$ I1 ,L Q71 O >_.. .. � a 'fit ;•-:", .... 11 1t I L! !� �__ ! 1 R j I . ,... e'7', te 1, ` I , s' v ii --,-.',. - / ,.., , ' ,,r,;4",r`l, ". f,/,`) : , 1 1 `: �r r d I. ..„5,41,z,,,,.1".!;:,,.--::' ,1)::://e/f;'';'',/,';';1• 11/61'/7") II' (Eli ■ _ ......i___*1 „.....:41;, ,,,,,,,,,,.x . ; -...„,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I,, ,/, ,i,4,,,.;.0,,, „, 1 1 i I Cf f J r +p1 1 r I I 1 . .. I X I .' " '4 X ) I i 1 ,.‘" , \ ii ■ i 1 : NINO? IN/linlY t` , 8011111 •U..-. II it iii rl- LI ii if II _Li ....._ i....__* ..,1.a-6w 401r44w ae w..Y 00 4—111-.P.Il11N Y.eakt f 1. Page 74 of 121 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Chur f Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 • i C i 1r ki, II NORTH ! N.T.S. 1 Immokolee Rd ,.1 E m° in v v o if V tl Oil Well Road I Im okalee 'd •andatl :ouevard o. a 0 cr Zi 5 0 5 to• • ,.Vqr d erb3t Beach Rd .2 t Golden Gate Blvd ea • vi o Pine Rid ' Rood • til �• Ns a): • a:: 0: • ciasiga ie Parkway -,J I-75 i LEGEND 8-LANE E4VIDED MEWL i 4-LANE DIVIDED ARTERIAL ..........••••••■• ■ • 2-LANE ARTERIAL ! 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL JIM TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Golden Gate Ward LDS Church Project Location & February 8, 2012 Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church JesQS`Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 75 of 121 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. That is,historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. In referencing the Trip Generation Manual, it was concluded that land use code"Church"(LUC 560)was the most appropriate use in order to estimate the project traffic. Note: Trip generation determinations for weekday events were based upon the size of the structure and trip generations for Sunday worship services were based upon the seating capacity. Table l of this report provides a detail of the calculations that were performed in. estimating the trip generations, which have been summarized below in Table B. TABLE B (Summation a Table 1 Daily Weekday New AM Weekday New PM Weekday New Sunday "Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated Peak Hour"Trips tADT) SyPh) (vph) ._ 182 11 12 140 The report concludes that the project will generate less than 50 net new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such,the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating"less than 50 trips",which is identified as a small-scale study. 4 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 76 of 121 TABLE 1. Golden Gate Ward LDS Church Trip Generation Computations Existing Trips Land Use Code Land Use Code Description Build-out Schedule LUC 560 Church 20,000 Square Feet 230 Seats DAILY TRAFFIC(ADT)-Computations based upon square feet Daily Traffic= =9,11(X) 9.11(20)=- 182 ADT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC(VIII)Computations bared upon square feet AM Peak Hour=T=0.56(X) 0.56(20) = 11 vph 62%Enter/38%Exit= 7/4 vph PM.PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC(VPH)Computations based upon square feet PM Peak Hour T=0.34(X)+5.24=0.34(20)+5.24 12 vph 48%Enter/52%Exit= 6/6 vph SUNDAY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC(VPH)Computations based upon seats Sunday Peak Hour— 0.61(X)=0.61(230) 140 vph 51%Enter/49%Exit= 71/69 vph Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Cdti cl`Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 77 of 121 Existing+Committed Road Network Figure 1 depicts the E+ C road network. As shown,there are no significant 5-year committed roadway improvements within the project's area of impact. Although improvements to Oil Well Road are under construction, it is outside the project's area of impact and therefore not noted in this report. Randall Boulevard is classified as a two lane arterial. The road functions as a principal. east/west interconnect between Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard and Desoto Boulevard. Within proximity of the site,the posted speed limit of Randall Boulevard is 45 MPH. Everglades Boulevard is classified as a two lane arterial. The road functions as a principal north/south interconnect between the southern Golden Gate Estates Area and Immokalee Road. Within proximity of the site,the posted speed limit of Everglades Boulevard is 45 MPH. Table 2A provides a detail of the surrounding E+C road network and their respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Five-year C.I.P. and 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan The County's five-year C.I.P. and the 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan can affect the design and future function of the site and its access to the adjacent streets. A summary of the relative five-year C.I.P. and 2035 LRTP have been summarized below with their potential impacts to the site. 5-Year CWP&2035 LRTP 5-Year Funded 2035 LRTP Planned Improvements Improvements Everglades Blvd None 4 -Lanes Randall Blvd None 6-Lanes 5 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 78 of 121 44 C i *U 0 0 00 & Z Z Z Z F) ..". t t e e e U 8 A c:,' 8 ct f o0 o o ..4 3 C") C) E 49 0 t ..w .E, Dr WI g 5 i5 I cr) 0 ,.. 1 " a - s = .e ...* rt) o a. a. a — z 4g 1 8 10 W I-- 0 LL. lig Ai ?ft aR e 4,, < lii csi re 8 g i Y! 5 1 8 8 8 03 - a o la c0 c0 te > > I-'• PI 1 . 0 15 (61 0 0 00 CL CL c% 3 rriDD DD i 1 .. ...v. CV C"../ CV CNI . C4 t.) W tO tO t.2 1 I ° il iti. tp, ,g, ui v to I 3 3 a ig ct a i S 1 i ..... 1 11 i it 1 .1t i 1 i i al I 1 re = 1 1 1 Growth Management an Application CPSS-2 2-1,The Church of Jegs Ahrist of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 79 of 121 Project Generated Traffic Distribution The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress,current and future traffic patterns in the area, demographics,as well as growth trends for the surrounding areas. Figure 2A provides a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Figure 2B depicts the expected net new AM and PM traffic distributions for peak hour peak direction and non- peak direction. Figure 2C depicts the total project traffic plus background traffic for 2016 project completion conditions. 6 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 80 of 121 i t7-- Immokalee Rd NORTH 1 P o OS. c s as a rn P tt %0• Oil Well Rood 3� 0% 427° -1► tmmkatee Rd Randall Boulevard m tall >Itt �I v 6 p i g 5 Si Vanderbilt reach Rd c o • c • 0 '««�« Golden Gate Blvd «..«». ««... 3'f�`1 34—► oIPine Ride flood 0) 7:) IX u U 0 co 1.-n e„torkwoy u v 0 E. iS w 1-75 I ....sir LEGEND 4 65X PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Golden Gate Ward LDS Church Project Generated April 24, 2014 Traffic Distribution FIGURE 2A Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church osut Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 81 of 121 o o Q z NORTH North Site Access "" KM li---",,, AMO : PMO SUNDAY 3 ,,) R n AM2 : PM3 y SUNDAY 31 ,� ao TOTAL AM PEAK ENTER/EXIT = 7 / 4 VPH z TOTAL PM PEAK ENTER/EXIT = 6 / 6 VPH TOTAL SUNDAY PEAK ENTER/EXIT = 71 / 69 VPH ( L. v a U U N -� o Cn co _c U) (1) 0 T.3 O d CP 1— n o (1) ar"'i a-? 40 •• >_ W AMO : PMO SUNDAY 4 Randall Boulevard AM 4 PM 3 SUNDAY 33 TOTAL AM PEAK ENTER/EXIT = 7 / 4 VPH TOTAL PM PEAK ENTER/EXIT = 6 / 6 VPH TOTAL SUNDAY PEAK ENTER/EXIT = 71 / 69 VPH Golden Gate Ward LDS Church PROJECT—GENERATED February 8, 2012 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 2B Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church eJes Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 82 of 121 Area of Significant impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2%and 3%criteria(i.e., if the project's traffic is 2%or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity,then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2A describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. As shown, there were no roadways that were found to be impacted by 2% or greater than its adopted level of service. As such,onl y Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard were considered to be impacted by the project. 7 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 83 of 121 to• .5 4., tc (2 00 00 c L' zz zz 0) ...'..: 6 t (3._.. , 0 co vt co c' NI 1... 0 CO C"10 .6 ci c-.5 6 sl v.t t, 4,3 c.., E v (/) t x .4) ci. ret a. z .t. axx2 'IF x a. a ,--- el c) 0 tt Cl- 6 Z: 0 z U 1 .r.:',3 6" ,, z z Ill ill I. 0_ CL 1— 1 0 ix c't. >al i c3 ,.. 0. .x.- 0. 2 u. 0 .E e 0 0• in cv tc'n C4 LK. cu C 0 0 (.0 < 5„, E /1 0 o ca o 00 03 ' 0 0 CO CD 0) CD (1) > > rag 0 i5 >• ti Ce SI l ° ° 00 ci.. a al u) v 0 F to oDD DD N CNI t •X U.1 LU GO (0 = '0 CO icg Ce 17 ro 0 CC ■••• • 0 let 20 H 2 — a 1, 404.! CC gg; 0 4 i 5 Ce1 c 2 E r, 133 0 (r 0 E Lri 6 0 i I , 0 g e co t i 1— 1.- -0 re V‘g a e = E • 0 i Growth Management Elan Application CPSS-2212-1,The Church of-jts.ui Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 84 of 121 2013 thru 201.6 Project Build-out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2013 thru 2016 project build-out traffic conditions,two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions,peak hour conditions, peak direction,and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor as shown on Table 213 was derived from the 2013 Collier County AUIR Reports. The annual growth rate was extracted from the growth trend determined via the 2007 thru 2013 AUIR Reports. Using the annual growth rate,the 2016 background traffic conditions were determined,which are depicted in.Table 2B. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips(trip bank)identified in the 2013 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season,peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2016 vested trips "+"background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 2B. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2016 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 2C provides a summary of the 2013 thru 2016 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build-out. Site Access Turn Lane Evaluation Figure 2B provides a detail of the anticipated turning movement volumes that will occur at the project's accesses. As shown,the weekday AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes will be less than 5 vehicles/hour turning left into the site,but Sunday peak hour events the left turn volume will be between 30 to 35 vehicles. Because left turn lane warrants are only satisfied for a one-hour event on Sunday, a waiver to the turn lane requirement has been granted by Collier County. 8 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 85 of 121 Q .E 0 a a. Z c 0 •'4 • r- Z a %.. a a. 0. 1 i- C 14**) th Cc"' ve•Ctl X E• e. r... n.3c tr"... ra. ra a. CO L. a., U.I 4 n . . . co il .....1 0 174 hi hi hi hi 0 > CO 3 ce 0 0 ,-, •--. 1.1.1< RI al ›- 0 < D m cil Z Z UJ 111 re .1 co C) V" el tr E 1 0 0 00 r- r- Csi 06 re V-- o CN1 t a E 2 t; c2 ta • o 2 to 2. 3 3 0 ti 0 o co '0 ip tu CC 2 2 03 St 4 03 0 To 13 7, g 11 '2 12 E o Al 0 x 0 — w 3:1 2 al t re 24 1 Growth Management Plan Application CPS 2012-1,llq e Church of 664 Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 I Page 86 of 121 s' g" 5 w▪ 9 t 0 0 ...) co a. a. c m• / 0 '4'• x to to to to ci 6 a. ......: t..) I. t- > z 6 8 8 00 tn i,.. t 3 , 1 " '7 Ciii Lt. > CO CI, CO .% 8 61 tr) to a. ›.- 2: ..... < k ti c-, 0 0 t z 'C i r 8 I Z Z W W EL k * a.. illi... g .9 00 ....1 LIJ (-1 tt. g 03 > Ill 1.1.1 owe atewi ›- w x 0 t.-- , r... . . 11 g o co 0 ca ca 00 ce ..., to .,..- , 0 ,... x . . . . g 1 6 (N N 1•••• ts CO > a. a. T. 0 4) 1::, CYL E te tat . e 0.■ (r 0) 0 $2 it •g' '3 -0 z . . 0 20.3 v O4 CC 2 co to a) .atb; To E c E ar to• o CC 0 E t, .0 > c0 .0 3 3 ce II = CO ili 12 at Growth Management Plan Application d'SS-201 2ad,The Church of Jeg arist of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 87 of 121 APPENDIX Support Documents 9 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 88 of 121 rs 1) t i say `•i � " � � 1 ' ' i'l- it' l' 1 ' I n lllihhlTliilbl^o $c) 1-j'—' :i. " , - t7 '014'. :— . ) EP—,' : ' i:' '', 1.P I R iiririirirw`i t ;11:1 11111 111 1 ._ W , a =: i L ! _. I . e iii 4 1. 1 it 11111411* :e9 i 4, 1 4. ,a '4' � j a 4 .44 ' . I3- " 1.41 •4 ;V .� �'`1 q41 i 1 rJ ; ffrPrPr:P Ji a j , ')d; ! I I 4 } � 4 a ' r c ' r � '4, 4:4 41 4 ! :44 4,.,... 44.4.,:t..t ,.. : ,.' : 4,,j.([ : : iLl'':ini '' :: I 1 :1",. J . ..lib . ' 4 '4 .!:44,.,i 1 COEC ECEI:OZEC10010011:::001CCII EEE;;ECIEIEE11111 41 i:CE[ IIII 1 1:111 - 11i 11111:11111 l :Q 1111111�111i111111 1 ilia 606E ECE ° °' E SO L ii TI CEEL 1EEL1 EEEig lEiELEEELECEL Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The ChAh ofJesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 89 of 121 Exhibit 5.M Pre-application Meeting Notes Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 90 of 121 MEETING NOTES COLLIER COUNTY **** DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT **** DATE /A- ^ TIME 'a'Oo A-•- NOTES BY V�,( L✓ -e/I f r TOPIC OF MEETING (r A f! 74.4/Z 6,sa 1' -Yr Dr La vie [ cok ift;,n Cif ATTENDANCE(pr nt name clearly) I - Se-para y' •61r(harp' KEY POINTS/UNDERSTANDINGS/CONCLUSIONS d f n,yy„i v),`ca op 1 8 4(4. G Ni—' "emir Ra4a l P014,4 1 v,�. f z p4T-Nb, )4,41,:#15 Or 044 o ?roi t4 f . 1 Give° 5-C 6idq 7142 fGe01 /V° oby Cc-rc G^ Pf if‘fa ! Arago pr,44- iPu "fo cird-ti in f "v� f. s if, ► mac. c sr)) . . qi-c' WI// S«-ve op, '14, ,, *X j /1-tri i dYVf Mr-� -F4-164r k / I.5. V-L,, kt&.C. i°r• OE cA AS 1' p11v�'�LQ loo„p . er I ar - i Y V r ,�.. 5411 41 hi rj V I r '4 1~G�„)rij �i f�. ✓ f r rp'es�I ;4'. 4/1 this s 71-e/la7y�k e-Ki/f1n, clGf/4n el S� ,Antes's # 'rdpr;Q 'i n( 5 Pf h9ta-f%or J r„, 14,00„ �rDvyf� e-xpzi-t 0,v 14/45cd,, >n &L4 fhilf4y I' tPt-f.1., of .e'Ai7ft,19 cQeJ%fr4i a c 7v!. Fri 4)- it 544j; cep- girt Silt _ M w/ a ifac;a f e/ t-1)(74 vk I, ;11 .-/-1'P f) 7r per.J ,(1tee, 5:4-t toti441 a Proud fife(f)1 A p,A0Tof d S l C /• r I 1Z 1hLM'� C� �;at (H Tf' hti 1 T• .ri yvr� — tipn 7� H t S/Bvr I ��S loo yif AN* + -1-7g /arf.c �5 r -f if 1"01,/14 recad / 1"•' •01'/ 4- be plif-i)p/ehcd f % v.-e �'s v 7 r p, / -l am ( rghe.('Mc t'ya,- n ttif byt u 1 4')■ f ' 7T1 n y -f./,c t�o i' Lrf i4t c 1'ki 1;”11 0 i,u• ) oh aa, ed 1-051. L1 l,.-t vrrvl. S Will '?,• Yl • Gv to _I C8 . t ; , ; D. r5. m.f•ar•h WAy pep=gie�t2,aoaAph cat„oe.PPSS-013-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 91 of 121 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX(239) 252-6358 www.coiliergov.net CONDITIONAL USE PETITION PI2E-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES & SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PL# 2011 -- 2(o2(� Date: 1 ' Time: 10 IV, Planner: \ `. & _A" ■A IA _ .11 Project Name: ,r a cAAliriii t. Project Addr/Location: 5 ���%Y �E�t�1 , 1 V • ' "'J ► ✓ J'11 LO Applicant Name: ,'MA4 Phone .'24f.700( Firm: 1-1110E10414 gegtZt54 '130J4014 la G. Taermatt-r-43 Current Zoning: Owner Name: 6411C014 C4 OF-6513SCt4CIST lTtee-044 c arc Owner Address: At *41UF3t,&Q,Tkeer f h Phone:`t7O.4Cil 1Z01, X 30; Meeting Attendees: (Attach Sign-in Sheet) NOTES: 1`.`'7 1--- >> {, w s tt 1a.>. t ",,f? mod- 4i, S0P T7'he ��rs= alb 3=�..� ..,�/ �-i.e jtropor.S1. rt-r ,e, RS c r voce•cr - -s tr c‘r rer aIo Svc w .,..rP.wthUe.. ftrk, 7 e. ,' t#.er4,. ri C. kee- ,:.t .ea c- - k:s `. `>1v. . •t ems;-�,..a b.4t . �v1C L14e _ or C--`a"ucv e•V. co Me' ►l � U i tAimar F L vcC A'S m 4,r (,51-wsp cr i s S°r v " ( (41 - tircu f' Growth Management Plan AptTcat)6■1 4$S-2 r EVetru{ Jeu 1-Chrst 64gtfeFA spricg P/rrrt $rpf)1. --� \\mss R `b\)' • • • • • • • • Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 93 of 121 CONDITIONAL USE(CU) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE:INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REQUIREMENTS #OF REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: ` / Cover letter briefly explaining the project ' JC Application (completed & signed) a t (download from website for current form) �-�J • *Additional set if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area 1 Addressing Checklist signed by Addressing 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24"X 36" plus (one 8 ' X 11 copy) Copies of Warranty Deed(s) 3 Completed Owner/Agent Affidavits, Notarized 2 Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) *or exemption justification 2 Digital/electronic copy of EIS 2 \;( Aerial photographs(taken within the previous 12 months min.scaled 5 1"=200'),showing FLUCCS Codes, Legend, and project boundary Statement of utility provisions(with all required attachments &sketches) 1 Traffic Impact Statement(TIS), or waiver 7 Copy of Traffic Impact Statement(TIS) on CDROM 3 Historical and Archeological Survey,or waiver 4 X Copies of State and/or Federal Permits Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s) 4 pc. C.v. Electronic copy of all documents and plans (CDROM or Diskette) 2 V. Boundary Survey 3 Affordable Housing or Economic Development Council Projects: >Q ❑ EDC"Fast Track"must submit approved copy of official application ❑ Affordable Housing"Expedited"must submit copy of signed Certificate of Agreement. 2 Jx_ **If project includes an Affordable Housing component,you are required to schedule a meeting before the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee by contacting the Collier County Housing and Human Services Department at 239-252-2273. PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW: SCHOOL DISTRICT(residential PARKS& REC—Vicky Ahmad components)Amy Taylor SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT DR/EM1 —EMER.MGMT—Dan \/' UTILITIES ENGINEERING: PAULO Summers 1•. MARTINS HOUSING& URBAN IMPROVEMENT BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE (only if Affordable Housing) REDEVELOPMENT Executive Director Conmuiitjkatid'ns`:Ta��lly MOSQUITO CONTROL COLLIER CO.AIRPORT AUTHORITY NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY , CITY OF NAPLES- ROBIN SINGER Coin "weal:Mtnr O idi.i`On1y% GLENDA SMITH,IMPACT FEES—copy of application only,no review necessary Rev 6-2011 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 94 of 121 FEES: ® Pre-application Fee$500.00(Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-app meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required.) $4,000.00 Application Fee/$1500 if filed in conjunction with a rezone petition $150.00 Fire Code Review,-j $300.00 Comprehensive Pl nning Consistency Review $925.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee - CCPC Meeting $500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee - BCC Meeting (any over- or under-payment will be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily News). re $1000.00 Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required) Transportation Fees, if required: _. Na-c- 1-21 p-6 ❑ $500.00 Methodology Review Fee,if required ❑ $750.00 Minor Study Review Fee, if required? N J¢ b pLk,NS (7v- Z._- 00 Pr, FE,* - ❑ $1,500.00 Major Study Review Fee, if require 2— -fit U OTHER REQUIREMENTS: El Applicant/Agent Signature Date Rev 6-2011 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 95 of 121 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS LDC 10.03.05 F. Applicant must conduct at least one Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) after initial staff review and comment on the application and before the Public Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission. Written notice of the meeting shall be sent to all property owners who are required to receive legal notification from the County pursuant to Section 10.03.05.B.8. Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are impacted by the proposed land use change and who have formally requested the County to be notified. A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the Land Development Services Department and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less than ten (10) days prior to the scheduled date of the NIM. The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be reasonably convenient to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient size to accommodate expected attendance. The applicant must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the meeting and legible site location map of the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one-fourth page, in type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in the County at least seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before,the NIM. The Collier County staff planner assigned to the project must attend the NIM and shall serve as the facilitator of the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it intends to develop the subject property. The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy to the Land Development Services Department. As a result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant shall be reduced to writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the Land Development Services Department. These written commitments will be made a part of the staff report of the County's review and approval bodies and made a part of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of approval. Rev 6-2011 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 96 of 121 1 _ t s 1--)1. v m x 12 �a, - di co 0 E 'C ° o a. J_ o TD m ,•0 J. �. O LU - 3 3 ../ o '- -1* m C if ` - �" 6 Z -I > 11 _:. -_, A -� '_' L .. `T E oil o 1".- U . NI pi :: ecLa azi J o ° a � r 1 W • t ( A 11 Q. C Z to - t o IA CU pr4 m c 64 c • U) W ZJ V 1 N LU D p `D „..n ;..., ,.„ ,:,,, •r_, vosi. 4:1) --- ), L 11 k .._, 3 gal 1 • m z F"Z h -5 v L�p ` it V -1 ' N :L J V ,l /I, f.i > y a `` 4 -.. 0 h Q3 M N I c• Ci l I. Ct ‘ -7.0•-• ce i _c ses 4 .,, w -4 Z z W �� a 2. T Cs) m a Iii 0 g Is r' ® 33 . .$ ,a 4.7 0 -5 ..... a ..if.‘. —A.. d.d Q a. < '7 H (� t Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 97 of 121 vim, '`-‘,,, -i 1- ' � m Q`� w - vi =D '' . ce at v ci < _, . t J G • a QS/ � ' 4 0 , a b W % 2 4 --Z. t I d. .i6 cr.\w 1. re � �o Z r N 00 N Z 1 N O ti Nr 1 ii I , a -_ �� Z N $ A o � s � � a w • L >nn 0 Ti k) j ... Z � 3 - - M U -4 , IQ co V y 2 0 tJTi\a 1 I 2 I , , ,,_ , , , Z Z i s In In 3 \-..2-., ? ;) - a J g ti - y Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 98 of 121 -4.„..-......- 4-4v1.,. -„IR,.4-,...:',..4...•-'44.21.4.;;...---..f,;;,*:7 1,-.9?"r„.. .vrz,lri prior-:::-$4...,0e.,...--?r"-...-!,I,I.:,1„...i........„ ‘ , . ., ,,v..0 ...i.,,,....L.,,, ,f,trwr., _.,.... 'P.;5...l',4115:?,'..i'..t;." '-- 1.'a.,,,As: 4,.4.";v4eze,-viii. 41,::.4,gr.-,:-„,-,-r..1,,,,.. • • 4,..,-,--iT -T- •-.211...„„„ •.t - z,..- ;•,...4.1.p..,ve.,„*:4c.,,:.,.•,..,4 .4-44,t.,...*.4.4:'•'-.4-'1-.,. ..:.:Tt..vr..,,,,.*• . . , 1 l,4,,,i5,4 .:,,:..•,-'.•$7.i.1,'.a."-4.-!..'-.-.:.::.!*,„,.1''.'1,'-'•,-.`.,-.-t`o-.3,,.r;A.i...s4-.:c,S 4o.`*...!,5N...4•.",4 C-L-qt...4'.-..r o..,A".?*,r"..-•:-y_,,'.,..:.;.,..".;.:'•..11-,'-IJ:,..,':.-.'i;,,:.,•-.r.+--,4-,_-4i4.4-:.t:4 s,'$4;$4-3-1:;4...-:,2--1--',;LN,•,.,...r.-....,.17,.47.-.1il.-.2ir ZF,A 1,7.1,-..7.•-.i-:..L.1.•1.7•1'41,.:70 v.4..1.;4,1f•t.E y:-4-•4,'1`.;,.4'...i•,”''j,'.:•'.,j:-..'l..rf?f.7r..;.,...:f4a 1..•L 4.-".I..f."4"1!,.4•5s4.-.:'''Er"0..'.r..,.50 r...1.e,-''•±1,.i•h••••.ii't,-j.?k..-...-;7..:..'•`,.s..'..-,e,.3.,,‘,-.‘.,U),..':...,.;.,•-.4c'ie a f z••'••.•4-,.7c-a.,4..:-;11--,.1.';i.',-;,.2,-••....7.F:':,.-r•..:',:,•11i.'4 E.1r"o O.4..!; --;5'e•.,-..:0.p,_ ,•..i, 2....•.0• ,.tp4 .K :g ;- 7 -,3 r •, . , ' , ' .• k,. w7r :.i..' ■ •---" f: , , ,.....,.,,..••._.;,,.......-1......;.:..„.:,...-4.1.::3•.:.$_•:-,;.......1.4 :4!-...'..-,4"..,".1:ii,4..?...;',-.1;T;FI I:,... ",$..„=: ,..,-;,:a.t_,;,..:';.$‘..'s,•;,.'iN41.1',":".r..--.:?;.•••'..,::::.::;,$.•-:.7..1$:,;.'",', ,'!...-...0.s:-.'-' .'"..''.. ,' • .'t i; ;$, ''.4.:'-;.-:.':^iAl .i...C.;*.....:,-;1444. •. ?"'i',5..,•".-,..4,_......."':.''''':'. '; C ':. a ••• ' :,. ..-----.‘...."-k.'.;.'''.;:`*:'..?-..-.''''_:;1.• " . i•.!t '% 1'2'..-' '''''':".1"--:-.4. ."11,... "-t-4"';..:. %' 7- ,,`f'..•-: . -:?-....- ''•fe$2 '-. ."'-'.........';::•9-.:'`,•.,'..''.-:. .!`,,5..ii.;'i..$ . 0,‘,;.. .1.••:;:44.-:.:_2 .:;x$1':;;._ ''''t''''''17•3 t'.!`".- . '.1.1. tZ:.;-.-...* ' • 4 '11:.:1.:-.:,;.'.0.,..';',4,11-..",', ..-,, .;r...t-' ''' .-Vir ..: •-. 4...f..-..,,::,,,4,-L4.7-:;e:..1.-‘iy,-' ,:itT `,„',4%,.;.'--- ,..:., i',%!•;..ii.1.4:,tlifr '",.-.A'f'• --f-: -.7:: - ''. .1, C--,-: . .),' .'. r..... •;;:i'llr.ti-1".,. i. ..---2. . :''.1, ,•-•:.- .... 7-14'2: '.-; .-. - ..ii; _ -.1-71' ,,:-,•~ a''', . :.:j,1%'.1,1" - ' -"Ilitt lit ...,',--'':-..- .`',.: 154 , ,, •''"":1";-2,;44..,;.; • Ai., 1".•'.- ' ..k ;,.....- , ''-,, .•?: '..s. ... "."' ,... '. • 1.. :• ' 7/wit': :i• ..; il ... ,...-. ... • •.% •..7.. -i .., 414., E .:...., y k . ..„..,... : :6 1, '1.1-1 ,“kt,$,•;,,I.- f . .3 0- •$-._$.,..:-..,' ,,,..1i, . . • , :._ .. ...„.1.1 4_ , - • . ..”•,...c .,,• .,,,,,t.- .. . 4 ,,.,;... -. . t ' ,.4.- '4' .1, -'''''''4..---' -''174' ' ' - .. •-14e014■*: i,..7.4:-....•' .. '•:. . '.. •. 4 .';'i.l. ;•.•' ,.;.'i",,r''..' "''. <•-,•:.. ")'al:.:.''3'''' .j-.." .....:•7'•'*. •: '1 ' •'t.I:...-: . . .',:'.• ..4.7.-' 4 •. ,:-...it. 24..•;••..' 3. •-•• • •• •••..v..,.1.,-• ,..it -• ' -.e•• . , .'-. •• • ..t.:,:•-. $• . :.0..,-."-3r$ . ,' ...• .... e...-;-7--• $.-. . • . •.r.-„,..--. . . ..- .. -- - - , ..... ..--. . --...7.k. „,...rx.= •,- ...!.. .,., .• ■ . .t•Is.,••••-•..-. . •, ,:, :.7,, - , •5., ,1•1 i.:""•,,.....2.:-.:. .. 1:, .-i . -.. •- , tF, -.4. ..,; ....:,..,....i,„-....le.,... .. .- i.:ttl ,, :. ., ,; 104 •"..:,.?;;;.T.:••-..;•s i,: ..‘:: '•••`. •'•••'"4.":i.. .•.--"•-(, -4-2- .g. ... ._;; . .:'...,• . ...4...:"%iZ:t... ''';'. •-,7.',..." •:", '-"..' •., :. .10' 4:- .: .:ID-tt 4'•-V,,". .. fr,,.c,!..,..rA,T,..F 'ir ,i r:'• '''''•.- ' .:: ..."."....;; 4•:-....,-.Lc---.;.-_.•:c•-'":•-... 7..:-1-,." * .,) ”.. ''"•: - •.,- • ',..,'-,`'.•./.'..;•1•.?.':;t: ,0. .,' 1 *51!!!°' '.:N. 1,"''..,.4;;T'‘'''' .- '' t.i.? . ...' k'.......**- '..' i,.-:.*;'•:'.,•,.1._.i.s.';..-'!".,.4• ..'";. ' ,"..-, , p71.1:'„•-•:.3;i.q4-,Z Av.,. ,!..;..,- -•., .. i.....i.: .' 1.' ..,' .... .1,,a,4,-04,... --,. ....:...: .v.;:- ;„.,..-• --',..:.,,,, '.J-,' , .,-....,- ... - ...: .0 i.11:..!..-. '--.--. -7: '''.-,•'.4,, ,; ' F r .'• ,••_,,''''•.... g.,44,." --,;'• ;.. 1:•-'1. •. ... • "-47' ti',-t4.,h .. .iy i'.,...?.., . 1...T;,• '•' •-..•'.. T167.71°.•,;:;. -• ,•-!,1.;•.-.." ,,„!.. .... . .. .1,7...... ., J.,.4-. Vt;444: 4 .‘'''.....9■7:'',. ...:!.....-* . •t'..;,4 ceA4--' ',4,fir...!V. ;,..-:'• '...:40%,ic 7.,.'-1 ? 1.i' ,,.... i• A .k.'1.7.•'...7:".74;$ •''.4 .a. -4 '. ....:. 4 ... r .. 4 ..4: ..,', ,":,-...,-,-..-.-. .,.. ... "..,......• tra., .., ' -,..1.3 3: • 4,-.zi,„Hr..... , i .4 '4". ....41 4,1•••:i'PS4 .= ,'i s , ...,, ,triiii, .. ..,...c...,..... ;..:1.-- .r,., . ..e....k. , .. - --- .4 - . '.N. •,-,...ft•. .. - , . •,7'. ":"O.': '.:'''. • . ••Z:-...• ■-,:..77' 4-. .._•1:,.. - - :-','. - 3 '' 4 w'r ..... -. . "1, . !i•c•?....; - 3, .,., ......r- !..,.t.i. si:.... .-.-..,... .0.(...,. .. .. - ...:..-: .....,, .., , ,0.‘,....,...-7-,... ....;:,,, ,..,.,-. .... , : -:-.i,_ : - , - I. - ,,.. :- -,,,,,7...,-...:74-.... , 0.....,:e;';‘,4 I J 1,L'at..•1,,,,,...1;, •.- •-k, 1 ).....,..IT,.„•4 -7. - ; • .. . .. . • ii., .. . . A. ... •;10 --: i r-- - 4 .- . W.& - gr i• t";.*1'44.‘, 4::'hi '' st.... [,,‘.-.v.Z.•;II,''''''1-4,.:;:...4:...;.:4-7 r....'.',..•.'' .72. .•....:!..,. --'"14'-.......,: ': .i.r.'' ' .''' '.% ..-.....:7•E';''Ae.c..f;1):71;. '•",.A l''j i:::?Y‘,:1.247,1g•I'•;:- ILI r 1.4.tr,i. ...„„ . ... ,_ . ,..., ,.,......., ..._ .^..7••.? '• •Z."4. .'flif ,R , .....;,.:. .,,,, - . ,.,.:„,... • -. . -.. , ; .• :.-., .... 4,.•• . ,:. ... ....,•. . ... -.. ...b4.,.., 1 , -,,4.......e.:,:t ......' •44.i.',;;.t:•:.':1.;... .'...7• ' .....',.,-. 1 --..,5•J. ..' ' ...•.: :--., - :-= ---- , '„.,.t z• s:-- ...- - - - , ,,:-,-;:.,i'....7Itor.,..,1•!-,C11 .'...A.41.4..`.:1:,A-* it ;•,..1*kl,,4:;..''''ci:4, ::;•.:4' •:;'•':% ... .-- '..''...'. ''.'' f••:11.AI%...-,''' '%;.:,. ,. ••t..,. ''''''..,"..... .:.... `....,,"„Ir.:"'',,7,1',..-f.'''-.•.,,4 ' •:'. 41 il'Ilt.:.•;,., . -44111. .• :.•.. •';'j 1■,•' ..:;'.;'-■ ."' ----ri,.:-.•,./:: . :•---..•,. - - - , "- •" , - -- ---- i••:- - ')-,,,- . ,. 4; . .-.,., r,.,,, ,,,:-- 1,-.,, ,-/_,.. ;.- ,...'.., , .:... ,;,....,... : .. . .. I. •-,,,....,;::!:,.--11--,;..-7-::: , .---'.-.• .. e.iii: •.-..,..r..v. :,-,li-i !..,•-..--.s12,7..-7 t.,:.1.-..t, . it,-.; ......7- : . . .:J.. ..7;..S.g.'.-....,..flir 1....:-4'....."-1;:. ''''. ...... !-:'.5 '.-' .,- 1,.., • , - ..i ',1 0 1 ir..,}.:•ife....• " It _ -,'„,t,.., ..',;11 La.•:- . •,:,,..a...I.."'• '.„.::Zit,r 7:1. -t-4-..4,..' .:'' . '' *".. :,' , ft..44...!••••.,.; .:-.1.!.!$C.,:„.'-'. '!-.' •. t':..4 i'' 1.i."'-.‘$.1:s•;;-1: j'..._, `'•,;';.',:'--.*', l'-....,41' •:. 1 .'' - .):- ' •-• , •' • ' ; : . 4,, ."4... ,..11.,:',. 1•. P. ''ir, 10 ' •L... ,i'''' '-".' ,,..;1^A.:..;','•.":. ■' '',.1.:,..,':. .c ., ,, .'' • ' ...'.' .. :• ii : -. "' • .-$ - v. .3 .. ' :.. • .' '.^I' ' ; ; .- - . -. lc,d ow .1.,,,,,.....; '_•••. '_ -. •,..--".., .••.a -'2:1'. ;•.""...:'...r.'.1..:..."' .1:. 1;:',7: .C r 7..41." Ir....! -'1.'::41.7 "."..44:.: 91,...='. 11.'.,'i i .. ?..,,T,... 14 • s, -• . •,.,v s.-, ;...•..,.: -, .:- $., it;:,..,..• . •!..• ",.. .T-411' -. '1:-.1.te 1:..•l'..'&OF.' 143..1"4:4'.'..• q:'.:'•4=k - -• ' .!i '..'-. •1',:h .. . ' '. ' ,......:......i',-,,si.: •••••• .i.. S . -- :' IT xt'k-,•: ':' ;• 4.. , -..i •.- .. .7.'''' •".."174.r`: ,..,.,! : :... . - . -:6",t,..2.•:-1...=,::..t.• ,t.:,:-...'1.:../.. ,:i1.-,t;,i'le ki.,11....-f.r:1".'et.71 ," ...* . -',, Zi,.., .7: !"-'..":. 1 c."1. ...°!'let.‘,y 0,11•\.: ''..'::'"4.,1:44'. ... .;.,"- ,-•-.4'.." -'.". i'-;:" .-,•:!:.:-.;.--,:.,'-:-.11.:!,''-t. .i.7.'.,',14'.% 3!:,-... -.-:'..'`::::*:, .';4.--1,.- '..'4!...,...5':2•1".? v Y' `, • ;;,--:,a%:,.. '. . , ' 4 4.';',t‘'.:7:•1..:n.. • .-:.;f2',..".:,..,t,•.k.'4P, :.-•-1 s• ..`4. ,:k...:' '"fV,....,* '44'1-.‘,;••••f;:•‘' .''' ,--. • ; •-+ , :"+.!‘.....1. 7 1 i '',' •-',1 ''.•. ',.;,,,i.:. 4. .... .. 14 4 )1.4.=4"..le 4,4 . '. ••••■•;01'.:....-'.. ". Vilft I.....;. ... -.:. ; :1,‘•. :'..tt77:!:..'•,. ..4.4.4: - •••" ' ' ' •44 ,. . ,.-4. 1:kpi, .,.,..,1,1,.., * ,..S.'44.4 44%. 4 ".; ...!i',.. tj......'.4-41. i ... ... ...'. '.. - 11 ,..., •. ...--," •.. -.-:.:,.; .-.,. -14,.,:-.(4 . -....---- ....... .:-........ .,..-.... --..'- .. ...11.... ,: -::......:- ...1cf,i.. -, .:-., •. .,.. ..... ?e.....,,-,,..: ...'.-, :._.:1 4-'..?1,.''-.•- ? .v..?'.-..!.:'..'.t'"'.'':•...,',.,.;.•-.•. „.•..•:-..'•.,., i-;..•._,tpt.1.,'Pt.l.t..e.. 1.,71.7. -(71.-":1:" 14.' i1:1•;''6...v 3.,A::t:$:■''-•s•',:-.,1-4'..i";;-,..'''Z''' :-'....4,.,:.•' ''',...'...f..,,.:,-...1-g:,';...'.. .....T...: f It r : r rf $• , - ...,',.-..,....-..'..'.....,-..,'....:4'1!1■,.„e‘'.-a,4i.-,• 1.1.:4 4 te,,vfi,-..;:;..i■.,•,.....0s,',....9...:•..::,-...,'•-....,.:..:,;-,.,,•.-....7.,,'44i..i 1,:..;;,.4:,:t 1/4,,Ic.:42,4,6.•f.......4ctrt.':•-• - ....' .; . !.' ' ' .13' -.';'• .$-....e.;.. '.:. .;.,i--,$ i.. f. '';.1.4• ic:1;1• g ..-,i-.,...-,:-.,;......c.. .:.. -1 Y.,'..;-• ,-,:-...:::4, ...;.4 ....;.':tre,f.r-.'..e.....P.,..11., ' ',...■., :-::1.-:,- _...r.1, „4 '-'-'";'','-it..it :-''-••-....t.-:':' :S.- i'' 1.7:..(1. 41-• 1-',Itv...' il ,:iy,„fiZI.,. . ..Z.L.• --;. -0 ..s--4.?, I'.44t, -- •••••- A.•-•'.,••,' ...E'..i.'.-•'. 1""1-:'•: ':' '''•..'",'''''•!- ... . .". '.0 a it'i e I '..1 ,. .'‘..*:..,: • .., L.=• ,-. Lt. , '.;„-. . . .,-,41..; 'f,l'..r.'ely"...-''''.-' '....'!. ' .-*--.‘:.;411P:':";.'': . ,' . i ,., .. .- ,:,....,.......,,,,.,-...,, 4. .1,_ i.,;.:., . ... 4--Ale, :-..."..;:.-„,:, ,.......::!,.. -- 7,'._._z.....,. . - -a ,ii,,.,,, , ' ,i,„.. .• ' t ...';'-:..,"' :.'" :j.F,i,:a..4,-.1-0,e414 Oti."4,..1,147(.?6•41y!e4:7.1.1417.,+r, 'f.r:,,..."•: .1471'. 804.."P-.1,■114"14'.:•'• ,r.,,, •..._ * ',4 . .,• -'• -. +'' • .4.0.-. '•• ••• ::,-ef--.• •• .•'••• ' - -.4--• • .' `./.* '....fl. - ' . ..=: - fiwav,a1.44,1:90•._....€.1-ml. ':.- ''' ,1`:''''$ $$"..."---1._ I,"" . ''r..'41'''.'•'''''' -"'l :.7 '`:..' '4:e...e . '.,'‘... -•2.'.,_..-;t•',... ...'.''V!...r t "' 1 r ''':::.''RANDALL BOULEVARD ' .111. .--:- , „,,..4,, , ..-.4.,...........: „„......._.:,...,...-- .:*V. ,..i. .-Ii• -.-.••...-.O. ' ' • 11....L.41...1 0 r ".•f t;••":; i ■ .,).. • ,• - - 7 •j7101- %41- . '. .7•-••: *V:: ' '.- ,,- • -' • • g .4' v. ,,., .. -, f. ::- .. ...'.i-_,_ , .,... .._, . . _ . _ . .- 1 . --.i .. ., ,, -,-. .- . • . , - • 7 !Air'' --'.1‘Xli,44 f.,i' ' - -7.' '-'4° n'Ail•k$--, ...'. t;i....-i-, • t '', PROPERTY LOCATION . ,- ,, - Yt a: :•. • ■:'' ...., sL„' --, '. 1,41.0 ',-,-.,. •.,' A... *-,..... -.-...- ' ■1--.- . • ,.. '. 4:' _,....r.:3 t-. „:,.,3.4. ' •i'' - -------'':-'. . ' ' -. 6' .,' .':-" . s ."le( : ,,- •••:. •••...1. . 1 J.R. EVANS ENGINEERING,P.A. GOLDEN GATE WARD(LDS) PROJECT#: 1 ESTERO,FLORIDA 33928 1 23150 FASHION DRIVE,SUITE 242 CHURCH FILE DATE: 11/2011 11 AZ PHONE:(239)273-3996 DESIGN BY: DCH i FAX:(239)288-2537 WWWJREVANSENGINEERING.COM PROPERTY LOCATION MAP ,SEC.19,TOWN.48S,R.28 E SCALE: JOSH R.EVANS P.E. FL COA#29226 1".100 FL LICENSE#:57436 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 vag6 wv 0 1 1 L I • • 4-.,---m .... ..,.. r• •r<.. w Au►yao R!e Mepino Fax PUei 1 ..A.C.,cnorty COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT WO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGeMENTMIAWR/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (23a)2824400 FAX(?.1* 2$2-5724 WWW,COLUERGOy.NET Pleaso complete the!dining and lax to the operatic s Department al 230-252-5724 or earn*M pen on to the MIMeshly Department at the eb0.9t address.anuttiatjzoitingsuag kmbs cam ro cl ro o L Not os term sin apply to evory pro}ect, 'Amnia In bold type are required, FOLIO NUMBERS MUST SE PROVIDED. Footle cider than 6 monk. nil require seethe rat review end approval by the Addrs,etng Doparfn7ertt PETrfON TYPE prid'Caf9 IYpe beam,complete a seperate Aekkareng CherNst ibr each Petehn type) RL(Blast Cod Pent) ❑SDP(Site Development Ppm) (❑t ED(Beet Dods BRertBwn) ❑SDPA(SDPµme CarnetattImos Permit CU{ A( Sop,(Ineubamnmr Ctanaa to SOP) ® VP ft xcav on Permit) SIN( t�rtl Mengel),Pl SIP) O FP(FinaI Pot 8NR(stool Name Change) uA(Lot Una Aludrnerrtl BtdC(epee{Name Change—Un PND(Project Marne�} TER Unmet(of Devebpme t Rohl') PPS(Plans&Plat R VA(,rar�nce) PUD(Preliminary ary Subd3vialon Pmt) VRP(vegetation Removal Perin VRSFP■ OTHER dam a s Rer»oval s n�imrrsi,. ❑ KZ{Statlaerd l l�"'n"r"mD''Pion O- `` ',vow., LEGAL PEOCWPTIONorauZ)ed property or properties(copy oNengNgd on maypa elfealsec9 1 S—Z$ l.>� See Attached sheet C ti4P," a k. #ea � C09 -1". .-1 1 t Et 5 6 1 (4 , ' ch 7 rk 11(0. FOLIO(Proporil ID)NUMBER(e)of above(attach lo,or(modele»r*h,legal description NrrAre than one) 1.)40243060009, 2.}40243040007 • STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(en appl oble.Ifalmedy moot moo) 14 3045 Randan 131,41 Naples,FL 34120 2.)no site address wettable •LOCATION MAP mot be attached shoeing mac c*location of p+okd/stte In rotation to nearest public road VA- of-way • SURvEY(copy•needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME oreppgaeme) PROPOSED STREET NAMES et epp&eLie) BETE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(orexkOng proles rates only) SDP - or AR or PL is Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 100 of 121 nkA Lanplea Yu raw 7 COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2300 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISroN1 NAPLES,FLORIDA 34904 PLANNING ANA REGULATION Z52-2400 FAX pet 2 - 724 M+virv0.001.I.IERsov.NFT ZZeor development ream:proposed far,or already appearing in,cendornhtfum doarne 1s(M applkat m whc�t>er propomod or exbtlnp} Please Chock One: ■Chtekliat ffi to he Faxed bark ❑ Petsarmly Pletmd Up APplACANT NAME R.Stubs Andaman,Esq.ROett&&Andreae,850 Park Shore Dr.,Naples F Floe 239 649-2708 FAX 239 261-3659 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not conalhrti Project endtor Street Narita approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department FoR STAFF UsE t]NLY FL (Primary) t.1-D Z 4 3D t-F be O 1 Foss Number 6r0 Z C}3 0 eel 0009 Fo to Number Folio Number page; 1 ! -- 3 0 f I Updalad by; ate; IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS,FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • • Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 101 of 121 Companion Conditional Use Application CU-PL20120002615 Master Concept Plan Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 102 of 121 m oe Y Z. 9 ADJACENT ZONING: E ¢ :3 $ ° il N Y �I —=� I I. ., 'moo — , • , w I s£ FFF Zf r -`s �±�' O131 —m —�• I o/ w T I I 1 r— _i13jlf19 8 3- 0, - �� i =' ' . ° 1I ,�? F # �',� ''ac's c a5'",,:rtl 1 3QS�9,„, \\ z I fr .,��d `' f e '?€ 3s,` $9�V„q�� ,n z x K U �Amy j I ��; o xr, I j rr I : �a I La I La a'w, r 3 t m —'Lt p 1 : o o� Z w 1 i w K U o lini z • O . -;” •I ilit*:,, .0... tirm' ° — riertirfilirl 'jj w T�Wr '''' u ' .Z ,. i o W ea_13 El 1 ::::::*, ,,:,,, _N. ;, Wa W[�C�i fff I z I �a>Jao, 3an�0 �:2 i rit a i I onii 0 I 2 z o _..—.——.-- - N3Jdf1B ,0. 3d.LL,S I , — — . .71 h w I I o e IIVONViI Ja F 11 11 ilg -- '\ /�--- 7 -� j 3 :ONINOZ 1N30VfON \\ / 3�, M 1 4 Z W a ,'', J ill Z it wt e'[.1W W •JYS.-fl-MC�em a.MY—,-i,-i�Onn VI %1 44„4,,4 L,. U r n Z 0 N J w >> z r L_ __ t:..W COW CC o `(nw a5 CO W Z att 0z1O co N<O Lo 0W WaZ OU Z W Q..= Qm J=O p N :S 0 U Z w> O z=ww 0 O m $W a Q NZ pr U ff..��p w =0O $ m t" ? �. =0 >Q z N W W a x Z Q O E 1:p °° w ° 000 z Z yc a, x 0 Li ZQQ � = E z xJ Z Z 1 I . 2 Z 6 cr J �OQ>x 0 W O 33 ∎ . �i$ O Cv 0 L N -w W N ■ rWa IN (f)U- r aN 000(/ 5 j N d '6 210 J w U> o NQD O O n Q O m gm � °o a W N W o 0 E '1.0 L L N a L W O O 1=0 4 U U 7 U m Q E < ° < In t (n N DZ U MM W m O Y LUL3 - D B N b,l• i•y z o n tpw a ZW W- } a o <D m CN 0° W ° p=W Oa in Z Q ¢ C E.2. . Z W° W cU Q N� CO ° �� Q Q 3 N . Z • � n a Qw x0 G� zr, vx0m d vi CI Mo 0 2 m Oai n z� w3wwo w v� m o�z E O no z� In N �xoaa»Q w° �� E =w O CA w to o u z•cc O Q a s Q 0 W O Z Z O J W al m e N E Z O 0 W>O U 0--,w F-- (n} tl w._.1.- is N� «0 �U Q• 0W r N z ,r1 �W W °md Y JFF W Li No n.@... (O N 170 wZ W v)v) W Y a N O U s N >QLY LY J0 I m z O yl.L N N N 0 -p Ur I w Q 3 r� a XQOJ 'n �zt>!a=wZF- 3-O ^I 01..-1 nm WwtY w� o0 W U° Nc al a u- (W/I Z <w-J aOmJN2I--O <U •Z W O _o Q (n r F 7 > Jaw CC O r o(aopZZ�° ww u•• ZOQ ES Cr j W (n N (/10>W wQ W N a0 C F O Q w Ox a U N Ow to m 0 x Lr W°m N0 •• •p < �U > n N �w� t 0>>F-5 zN �w � p�� .q NJr Z wZ FZ w 0 OJ gU— O YzZ OamQ zF Qd it _ CI p w>H z�°I�-- U x a _zap �O aW� (Y Wm(zj� 0w D $o 0-. •d m d J°(Y UW co N Z N (L r=m UJN Z a° O E E E-.2 A= N 8 rn O°UF- Fw LO x n O= II per a=°a wo E E E E-ma 9'. c� QQQQ N> a U 6 U v Oz Z N o c_ c_ c 9 Y S c C c- [YL+7L+L X af):Q Q (f)12 J O LL U)C° 1p� N O U,ry LJ CC CC a QU w j a W cY~N m°W,p'N 0Y O ...11 J N m gut'� CC N a (` „I, LL Ow 0 () w Z>W WUnQ�w"p0 a`_�°_ 0 LY 0 N --I J--J WU>W>UaZrr LI 17 0°m'P..a W 0 (Y W 0 Vv<w0UjW05aW o w.q.' M O w z M r>0ZQj000.0 N <W oas" a Z N r aRW>N PO Z u W^ I- ; Z z L 0 Z z w Z w °5 (,. CZ J Z W LJJ 01 d �o 4.1 01 ceMzz N F I- z0ow w z r o o Z•UQUi ce0 a O ira°F- I-Q° 0z w Z 0 KO ° d N W(n Z U H U Z w Z N N � Py a W rJ �pN7 (L O d LL o J O tt Z Q Z? °°Q W LAN = 0 RR 3 w w a W Z N °W 0 0 La_ Z LT_ Yfn (n w Y < 0 W rQaa wzo� zo K�Q o c V Z "! o �0 Ko» I.J. jW I I I I I w }Oa H a m Q 5O>_-;'&'-1 Q°w U,aj 0m WU ,) } 3Pa 6a3 U= 3 a z U a J d'Q N Q a = 6 Q ZwIY °yam° F lY Ja 3 Z a ca ZZw° M w z QU° g{F cr <0 U 0 H m LJ U°—iWI D W co F LJ l O W K c "-, 0 N re(/1 II I-.o m LA a. W l.L ° O CO In a- O)4,, 6 W Q 0 5E Q W°r p r W 0 Q N N I 7 a' N• F- Zar>-o cr t33 L> ° Et ° o o N` a 00, w W LL?5Z Q.a 0 co W Q W J a O p Q>yx a(/1 O < 0Ww Z Wob�F a-zcn o Cl) co m zam cx a?Z(/iW Oar0 v0 W N X Y �5NZ0 o>aw d D (nw k a W 41 C� W gm Z OU aoU0 FI 0 -W 1 I I JO N a .- a .NOS [L ° a_ Z ct a' - O O h m r Z J Q o^z� >°w Uz WU Zta) m W W O Z a Q— g Q W U J co H in 0 m0I.° r W maJr=- r3 d L>LAJ=�paY z <• rr J • z 0L')a;0¢ U7 0wW O co 'ft' 1• Lo° Le' aaQLL F Q Eli o a o a (n w='w° Z Q(raj ° ° y a w Q w O o°o W Z Z WOO W 333a 2' f o w p Y 3 vai , 3 p Q -I0 <Z-p D w o 0 - W Z W° W LI. co J a co a ° ~CI) O <J W Q O O J(w/I°Q .._I J�J? cc m Q O W a F JZ J>K a Q U xzcFW F- agaz D a< CO n o 3 r <E>ma r..7(Az D O7O5 m 3 m rn r ^ (LraLL w .as a.m,V,V,am..-1,11, din om a+++rui am■-IJ-ra.c sm-ob. .o.". Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 105 of 121 ROETZEL 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34103 DIRECT DIAL 239.649.2708 PHONE 239.649.6200 FAX 239.261.3659 banderson@ralaw.com wW W.RALAW.COM May 12, 2014 Nancy Gundlach,AICP,PLA,Principal Planner Planning&Zoning Department Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 334104 Michele Mosca,AICP, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 334104 Re: CPSS-2012-1 and CU-PL20110002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Dear Ms. Gundlach and Ms. Mosca: The purpose of this letter is to provide a summary of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Neighborhood Information Meeting as required by the Land Development Code. The meeting was held March 31, 2014, at 5:30 p.m. at the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District: 13250 Immokalee Rd, Naples, FL 34120. The applicant's affidavit and copies of the meeting notice and advertisement are attached. The meeting was attended by the applicant, the consultant team, and one resident that lives adjacent to the subject property. The attached meeting sign-in sheet provides a complete list of attendees. Bruce Anderson, agent for the applicant, gave an overview of the Church or Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints application requests. The overview included the project information on the attached NIM handout One question was posed by the adjacent property owner. Q: How quick can you get this under construction, because we need more services like churches in the Estates? A: Construction will begin as soon as all permits are obtained, we anticipate by the end of the year. ROETZEL&ANDRESS Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 106 of 121 Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner May 12, 2014 Page 2 The meeting concluded at 5:50 p.m. A recording of the meeting is included on the DVD provided. Sincerely, ROETZEL&ANDRESS,LPA e_424-ficizA4,0„-t__ R. Bruce Anderson For the Firm RBA/dk Enclosure 8277399_I 103972.0008 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 107 of 121 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE 1 hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment,or conditional use,at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Signature of Applicant) State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this day of 2014 b , who is personally known to me or who has produced .L. as identification. cign_e" ature of otary Public) T (Notary Seal) C tS sr o g` CINDY oR:sso Printed Name Notary 1„N ,1 •i y St to a Fl ods?Mco m bones %;;4,, " Commfssran t EE 862517 4 -4.-°'"`" Bonded Tetouan(National Notify Aisn. GANIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance.-NIM Oct20l0.1k0c Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 108 of 121 THE CHURCH or JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY DAY SAINTS MEETINGHOUSE FACILITIES DEPARTMENT 50 East North Tamale Strop( Sal Lake City,Utah 84150-0011 September 13,2012. Collier County Government Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,Florida Re: Rick Piacente as desi Hated reFresentative for Owner for the new Church Meetinghouse project at Golden Gate Estates Meetinghouse in Collier County Florida, To whom it may concern, This letter is to confirm that Rick Piacente, as Project Manager, is the individual designated to act on behalf of the property owner, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the "Church"), relative to the above referenced project, including the signing for permits, applications, and other documents and submissions required by Collier County in regards to the construction of the Golden Gate Estates Meetinghouse in Collier County,Florida. The undersigned is an authorized agent for the Church (as evidenced by the attached certificate of authority). Sincerely, 41, „ r0it red W. Doxe • irector,North American Operations Enclosure Subscribed and sworn before me this__1 __day of .errl zcetC__..._., 2012. ►i rat I n-1 Gc - - Notary Pu • r" ; CINDY GROWCOCK NOTARY PUSUC•STATE OFUTAH s '4' My Comm.Exp.01/04/2016 Commission#651473 4837-3373-7233.i Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 109 of 121 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY I,H.David Burton,do hereby certify(a)that I am the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,a religious association,and by virtue of such office I am the incumbent of Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,a Utah corporation sole;(b)that I mn the person designated in the Articles of Incorporation of said corporation solo to sign and execute deeds and other instruments in writing and transact all business of said corporation pursuant to the provisions of Section 16-7-8 oftheUtah Code Annotated, 1953,as amended;and(c)that,pursuant to said Section 16-7-8,1 hereby designate and appoint Ja red W.Doxey as an agent authorized and empowered for and in behalf of said corporation sole to take the following actions in transactions whose dollar value does not exceed$5,000,000: (a) To execute deeds,easements and other Instruments, purchase, sale, architectural, construction, repair, maintenance and other contracts,promissory notes,mortgages,bills of sale,assignments,notices,reports, title documents and other documents relating to the acquisition,purchase,sale,exchange,development,use, lease,maintenance,repair,Improvement,taxation,encumbrance and release thereof,or other disposition of real and personal property of any kind; (b) To execute,file and prosecute building permit applications,petitions,complaints and protests relating to real and personal property of any kind; (c) To execute instruments,proxies,voting trusts, voting agreements and other documents relating to water rights and stock in water,canal and irrigation companies. EXECUTED and DATED at Salt Lake City,Utah this fO day of /Lpc,.....„A.tt-t'a-;2010. CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CIIURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS BY_ 4101(.I 7# — ------ ----� Ai ,4,, r H.Da,' 'on,incumbent STATE OF UTAH ) . ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) On the J 0 day of /La04,,a-t'`-' , 2010, personally appeared before me IL David Burton, personally known to me to be the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and acknowledged to me that he signed the foregoing instrument as incumbent of Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,and the said II.David Burton acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. ,�gg i .L.ai Ci. S.j NOTAR-Y PIJ I IC in and for said County and State 4)<-4 s JULIA C.BAKER a NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF UTAH may►' My Comm.Exp,1108/2013 Commission#577018 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 110 of 121 ROETZEL 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34103 DIRECT DIAL 239.649.2708 PHONE 239.649.6200 FAx 239.261.3659 banderson @ralaw.com W W W.RALAW.COM March 5, 2014 i Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that formal applications for Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1, a Small Scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use, and Conditional Use Petition CU-PL-20120002615, have been submitted to Collier County seeking approval for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for the following described property: The subject property for the proposed Church of Jesus Christ of Latter- day Saints is located at Northwest Corner of Intersection of Everglades Blvd.&Randall Blvd.,Golden Gate Estates. The petitioner is asking the County to approve this application to allow for a church at a maximum size of 20,0000 square feet on+7.80 acres In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on March 31, 2014 at 5:30pM located at Big Cypress Island Fire Control & Rescue District at 13250 Immokalee Road,Naples,FL 34120. At this meeting every effort will be made to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me at (239)649- 2708,banderson @ralaw.com,or Anita Jenkins,AICP at(239)405-9148,Anita @jrevansengineering.com. Sincerely, ROETZEL&ANDRESS, LPA R.Bruce Anderson For the Firm RBA/dk 8094832_I 103972.0008 ROETZEL&ANDRESS CHICAGO WASHINGTON,D.C. CLEVELAND TOLEDO AKRON COLUMBUS CINCINNATI A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ORLANDO FORT MYERS NAPLES FORT LAUDERDALE TALLAHASSEE NEW YORK Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 111 of 121 .d. .-1 m O 00 O O 0 N O m N 0 0 M V 00 V .-I 0 0 0 50 Ol M O M N N 0 W M Ol Ol Ol 0 M N M M Ol Ol 00 M l0 O M 00 N N e-1 N ct O M Ol N a N O1 < N l0 O O N Ol .-1 0 01 l0 t0 ., N ec . I0 0 0 M Ill M et 00 N O O m M l0 l0 M O M M N N M N N N N N .-1 0 < .i 01 V .1 0 00 00 0 00 01 00 0 0 0 t0 0 0 ti m 0 M 0 m M 0 ct 0 .4 ct 0 0 0 et .i 0 V V M Ol m N 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0l t0 M l0 0 NI M N 0 M M 0 .i 0 .-/ 0 0 .-1 M .1 m N .-1 N M e-1 N V 0 .i 0 0 .-1 ri O N .i M .-4 M .I N .-1 .i V M N .$ e-1 .-1 .-I M 0 M .-1 t0 00 01N0000000000 .i o O 01 N 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 cf m N 00 O 00 N 0 0 0 .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N 00 I0 .-I N IO O O O N O N O V 00 N W N .1 N N N N t0 N m N O N N O .1 0 0 N R N .-1 0 0 N . O N .-1 O N N N t0 N N N N N Ill N N .-/ N N .1 0 M 01 N N N O N .i N N N , p e-1 0 .-I .-4 .i e1 W .4 Qm ec}/ .1 ei e-1 .i 0 .-1 .1 0 a N .i O N ,1 .1 .i Vl 00 .i .i rl e-1 .-1 .i .i l0 O l0 o N a .i .-1 .i 01 .4 0 .i 01 .4 N O M M m m 0 m 00 m m m .`l m m m ..4 100 00 0QO m m m m m m m m m m N m m m m N o m lm m m m m m m a o m o m m m P m m m .A/ mmi m a N IJ 00 v-- _, LL LL LL. . . . . . . . LL IL LL a _ _, S LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL o LL LL LL LL z z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O a LL G z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S LL LL U W = a a m 00 m 0 0 2 z 0 O Z Z 2 x J 00 2- 0 H Q 3 o 0 g x O O < 0 0 z O 21e X_, O a W 2 2 m W W m W W W J J J J J wa J J J J J lJWm J J = Nn w wJ m J J J J GG J cc a . m _, W W G .. O , . J 3 Q T a Q U < Q U a a a w u Ja a a Q a a Q d a a Z a a a a a Q 2 u a a aa a' a 5 Q a O Q U aG z z W 2H z z z i a Q W a a Q W a Q a a < '-' n -- 2 O Q a Q Q Q U z = z z z z C z Oz W z - ., c z E 3 Z 2 3 U 2 2 2 2 Y Z Z Z 2 - 2 0 2 Q w m Z Z 2 a 2 x 2 3 - Z z x Ln U W I U J J a W QfQ 2 m Y a 3 00 u z O , 0 uz z 00 w 0 Z z a o a O 0 to 2 NI N .N M z N N.•I 00 J LL 0 2 N N ?) Z > a W > 0 0 0 Y W 2 > CO J m m u 2 z z w > z z W _ G W j/1 O a o H w Q Q Qa = NC Z > 2 p J lL Z p ¢ M e a< z Y K 2 vl N NO wt-98 N Q Z = O O■ M 00 00 z 2 (A 3 00 3 x tF NV v N N Q N 0 N W W v 710 Q N Z lemj 501 ,,, co et (.40 N 0 N .-1 0 IV 0 0 0 N O 0 .4 NM b N aa N N Z M M N 0 Ill 0 MM M N •U .4 et M M O O a a W 0 00 00 a a 0 Z 0 a Z Z Z cwc O z a O a 00 0 to e-1 L J W J 0 . J J J > > J w r1 O J W , a J a' W Q F 1- W W > w > w 501 N Vl » W W Q O Y m m W m 0 K Y ve W z 2 In W Y m 0 2 m z 2 z 2 2 N W O W W J J QJ M a W 2 J 00 Vl 0 a a p W O W 2 O I... s u a Sow Z Q O_ Q W W W W WO 2 F- J W K NY W U Q in `� 0 W a O W O inch O Q U O J Y K ,m1 a Q Q o a N o m < w N Q > Y 2 Y Y 0 0 0 W O m0 )- 1- 8 -' l J 3w3 l7 s' ' a Q Q O QY� 3 W z 3 LL a W J S M -4 W Q z W Z V 3 > 2 S u w 2 0 0 H N r` ID ° 3 ,-. N Y a ¢ O W W N-1 F- W Q z Q z k l� 2 OL w 01 N le = Y -. W C . O Z VC_Ul 3 W z a O O N 0 W 3 a' 0.) J N w a z °w� W e4 O •0 00 - _aWl o 0 U Iy W O W O W 0 U� W a' a' (4 ,4 0 K N v as 0 3 a Q w W W W 2 J C VI LL f m ul .1 .1 0 m popl� a cr ul W o z F F m o m 2 w = 0 .- M o e 0 o m 00 .1 00 000 o v Q 0 a m .1 O 2 ec .r N 2 Ian m Q i0 Iwn a 00 00 0 a0' 000 Om1 N 1011 O Ol m Ol ..4 Q 000 Z et F< N O N O M 000 ct u01 N 0 ¢ 0 .70 '70 Q l0 Om1 O1 01 pMp eZ 0 N N O ppN 4N0 eu 2 l0 40 M t0 O Q~Q 0 e=c 2 .400 .-100000001000000 .40. 01 ) 000 ..] M a 01 H U M M H N 0 N N M N a J N N N N 10 e W l0 .y a 00 M m e o N N N N a' le -i . e z 0 p a Y _Z u W W 0 2 2 a Y cO 0 W W N m_ m Q W 02 W LL LL 2 G Q CO V Q < a' C to Z 00 < v~i J a m 2 Q w 22 0 U II N 0� 7 Q 0a W C PA 00 0b u O z aiy h 2 l 2 K ¢ 00 Q Q a f z O Q 00 0 a w n u 11 Q O W 11 S S cc m Y 2 2Z a a K p = 0 2 W w a U U C J J c W U 00 g O ..., < „, ,2 N ~ O O 0 c QQ O Q J Z F m C C O 11 Q Q F O z_ U = 2 D z 2 0 W Q mQ O S » m W H Z 0�f z C it W Q NL II a Q a' O 2 a >< K C = C a7J Ia_ p m 4a auI0 aa0JU2 V w J 0 a0002U. maaD3Jl 0 < O00 < > p0 0w - 3 Wm 0I- 0Qc as Zmccuu, GQaO O LY = F O 5, Q 1/Q� 1/� U c N IL LL d 2 e Q Z O O 0 a W u g W 0e VN-1 = NL 0 3 m J m m = G O O a0 W S 00 Op j W U W W p pc c Q W 0 l7 W K a OJ J 0 _ 0 Q 2 ). O j l7 O z VI o Z O W U m Z N 501 W Q 3 a N U Vj11 W w W W= J g le W J w W m o: W _, G c 0 0 Y W W p 1 U U g N- N oz d -. D O Q 2 x z p W W O a d N Q J a W < J J a a d d W /Y c a a p O NY Z 00 ' 0 , m m 0e ec W 2 m pF U w a ] W W 2 Iuil Z ril Y k w U G wC N N, 3 m w Q • 0 0 20 _z 2 W m - W > > w m a w g w a Q 0e 00 00 a O 7 �j O p 1u 00 w N� z J J w d cc m f z ec LL m 0 VVQ) p 0 o o J y 2 vl Q 0 J cc W O G' Oe et Q a a M S 2 J O K a g 0 a W W J ce 00 00 O Q Q Q 0 0 0 O O Q O 2 J O 2 Q a W W J Z O Z a a a a tO 000000000000 U U CCJJ laJ W U U U U U 0 0 0 0 O W u. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Ii U' 0 l7 u' 0 S Z 2 Y Y Y Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 I 0, 22 8 iA M 04 M I im p 8 I V i l V p A $ p p I P i i i i Y m M N p0 R O m i i p0 p p n 0 BNt0 N . Y 2 N o0 a v 0 o 00 N M N 0 a ° o S - N ° p m . I0O ° pN Vn 1 o p v ~ O N 50 o N N N N N vN N a V V n N N N o N N N e a vQ aN v N -. .. a a a � ° w ~ � M ° ° ° a ° O < oo0oe ° oigyA . 0000g ooaers osgN ° ssp0 p p ° O O oV R V pV ppppa ppe e g < ppg a ppppe oppp VV. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 112 of 121 CO N Ln 0 0 N a 01 01 Ill to IN 01 .-1 to to O l0 N 0 00 N 01 'Cr lO l0 01 a s .-I O W CO a N CO m 0 N N N a 0 0 �'-I t0 N N en N en t0 t0 .ei Cr N N O .-I aa{ CO en to n O Ill e-I .-1 V' e to to to m W .-1 m a al a e-I .1 .-I a Ill N a N 01 0 0 n 0 01 0 0 0 n 0] .-I en a O n 0 00 en m 0 e N 00 0 .1 .N-1 .-I -N1 a en .N-1 I-I .0 ,1 ttO 01 Q-1 .ai .I N .N-1 ..-1 .e-I 0 ti a N en a a a a a 0 a a e e Cl 0 m en a a e In a CO a n 00 e m e m m e to m e e m a 0 e m e ltoo a In m a e a en 11• LL ll- LL LL LL J LL LL LL LL G a CL LJi LL w LL 2• LL LL z Z F 0 Z Z O ▪ o: F 3 Z a Q 0 0 Z F >- a - w w w w Ln Z w w In w 5 a N Q w a 0 W C J J J O J J a Q co J cc J F l a J 0 V, Q a n. a o. L. a a < < < o- a a Z a Z a O C 2 z z z z z LL, z z z z Y H L 2 z i0 z vQ, 2 ¢ z m Da. ec 0 1- z 0 a 2 F U 0 0 Q FO to - 0 F to O Z — 0 La N Y o U O a 0 n D e cc cn a F K tu m Z_, F en > 2 Q a CC Q Cl lO H W CC 0 Zo m a -I N > W ey C x N 0O to m tnn N 110 N 3 0 N co 0 0 to °.I n F m .-1 a 11. .-I CO .-I D 00 en } In 3 F Z Z Z n a > to s J > Q 0 ? wm > 3 wwm m � g ° LL, 0 O Z Q W W Z w Z w vii n 07 l=7 0 0 2 0 C''' C Cr g > za > > > F FE ag g to U O O a F a a a 1n w g 0 0 0 m to N O a 2 F U' Fir, x ° >' 2 2 2 x U o o U to a } 0 LT, r O a o— 0 1- w en N o K a a to a > ,_cc 0 a a 3 H to Z W tD 2 N N N N !- Z W S w F w m x ca K F en N O 0 .y .-1 '- U O O ,1 O a ' F 0 1 4 0 7 to m U O Y m 1D 2 tD O O n n co en en 0 m Z — en 00 N U N 0p1 U In 1.02 .4. 0 m en 01 en m U Q Z c or W en O O N 0 W .-1 .7 Q N N 00 �N N N N U H a C N m N 01 a Z N QI } Q a LLI F 0 U w a 06 J Z = 1 ZQ• = CO O Z Z Z a Y Q Q o >- 071 Q Z Z z Q J °_9 P O f F E x a > 0 Q w F r OO 0 2 “.. a w w w = w O O to Iii x U al .6 ¢ O u to Q x 1F„ O I'ssi z Z Z > F ¢Z� !i !, ¢ F s O Z a he to O Z O 2 > g 0 Z u 0 o O U c Q ni N N = Q >LLJ a 0 2 a - tai O Z Z J ZO F > > » U 2 Z O ce O = D • w 0 '0 < Q w cC Q l7 l7 l7 2 Q w a 0 a U to a a U 2 7 w NS w ri w W z z ¢ 0 cc w w 0 22- ,i:a l.,us?_ ..? a a W W W cc"' W O > 0 0 0 U 0 F 5 x x co W Z 0 0 a a a a 0. a a a a ¢ Q s s In N to to F F F } a N 8 V n N m n 0 D n 883111188 '8111 8888 $ $ 88888 8 N ID b 03 N W l0 N 00 00 N 0 11:1 '091 00 N N - N a In 0 N e e N N N N N 0 0 N N N 0 0 .-1 e a n 0 0 e 0 a e 0 0 0 ■ e e n a n a a n e n to N N .-1 en m N en N N e en en N N N .0 N e•1 N N •0 N .-1 en O O a 0 OO a O a 0 a 0 0 O a O 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 O e Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 113 of 121 I- N .-I N N O en .-1 . O 0 - 0 O N en N - O e n - en .-1 •-■ - .-1 .-I O N e-1 N N - O en O .-I m 0 0 - 0 0 .1 0 r1 - N 0 N N 00004 0 M 0 e-1 N - z p Q▪ a .I N M N In .1 a m N N .1 N macho IO 1` N N CO 01 tD a en en ei 0 - .-1 01 .-1 rn N N .-I 00 m t0 0 a N m N 00 m a tp N N Co N N to m N ei 0 N .-1 N 01 0 Cl .1 01 .-I .1 N .-1 .-1 I I .-I N .i 0 .-I N N N 0 H 01 N .4 .i m 01 - N .4 N O 01 .i N re .i 01 e-1 e-1 01 N 01 0 J 1-1 N r♦ .-1 .i .y .I ■i .i .i .i .I1 .i r♦ .-I .-1 .i .1 .i .1 I N .-■ P. r' e0 00 e0 e0 e0 eo eo e0 e0 CO e0 0o c0 eo CO e0 e0 W W W 07 CO e0 e0 e0 e0 00 e0 eO C0 C Oo e0 e0 e0 e0 00 CO 00 CO e0 W CO C Oe CO 00 00 CO 00 CO W CO CO CO W OO CO CO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z Q C 6 00 00 eo eo e0 W e0 e0 00 m co 0o eo eo ao oD oo 0o eD eo eo 0o eo eo 00 00 00 eo co eD o0 0o eo 0o m eo co o0 0o eo eo 00 oo o0 0o ca eo Co oo o0 0o 0o 00 0o co oo co en oo • a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a FG0 Cl 01 0 m 0 0 0 0 m m m 0 m 0 01 01 m m 0 0 m m m 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 m 0 0 0 m m m o1 m m m 0 01 0 0 m 0 m 0 01 m m m m m 0 01 01 N .-1 - N .-I en N N N N N .4 N .i N .-1 - .-1 N Cl N .-I .1 re N N N N en .-1 N .-I N N N .i .i N .4 N .1 .1 N .i N N .4 N N N .i .4 ei .-1 N .-1 N .-I .i W In a J a 0 Cu J Cr W W N N en en O'C 0 tto ttoo CO W oa; 0 .-I m a .1 .1 Q a a a a a a W N O N N Co J en to N W en N to .i .1 .-I ."I CA m en 0 N 0 to CO o CO ri CO CC .tea a . (7 a O a In N O a .. O O 0 O1 0 N CO.y 0 CO N Co Oo a l7 N a .i t0 a on IX) N to ° a a N N .I 01 ° a m e-1 .rv.I a l7 l7 CL C C m0 . a to 0 V z 01 cc m .I .1 .I 01 N K z l7 a •� v1 a a F In on F 0 N Co Inc,N N LL .. F m N ~ .�'' FC„ FC- a F F M F D. f` C in co N O z LLO C O ce C a C O O o {LL- .`-I 0 LL LL u. ma W 0 .•. LLO k0 10 10 LI- ."' In rl cc cC o .~'1 .N-I In 0 o .N-I 0 o < N a .m-1 N re N < 0 CO.l O re m .I 0 Q tL 0 O a0 tl ll l7 tl O O O 0 t0 0 tL ti 0 .n-1 O a1 N a O N N ei N O N a N m N N N a N N ^ co .-1 .i .-■ a N N N .-1 0 C11 .i o0 m .1 0 m o O 4 0_ 0 In In CO 0 H N O ."1 m N IO m N m N ei C C C cc C L„I C C ."I C C C C C _ C C C N C C ."I •"I CO m C .-I .1 C C C In C C N to H C co .y a y. N C C C C ~ C C C C F I- C F CC I- F F F F F 1- to I- I- ul F F I- C F I- C •'1 C F F- "'1 F .1 .-1 1- 00 .-1 I- C C F C "'1 1- I•- F C I- I- 1- I- N c/ o LL a LL Q Q LL O Q Iy N LL LL LL o LL N LL LL F LL > F VI F LL a W ty W Z u. O W > Iy F > F LL F to LL LL F LL LL LL LL O O lO FO. O O n 0 0 O 0 0 I:LL 00 O LL O O LL F L L L LL LL O u_ m 0 LL 0 LL LL 0 LL LL 0 LL ta_ {I.,._. O Ia_ FLL. 0 0 0 FLL- (F 0. 0 O O u. in o 11 N la_ o o in en u ~ o In o ° o t ~ u- 0 0 0 U. I�`n LL U�`1 LL '�" o o °v o la_ I�`n LL o 0 o LL Vl t�`n o 0 J N I .�-I N o N .v-1 .r-1 N ti N O re ° re .~-1 .N-1 0 O N ..I 1-1 .r. N O O N N N N s 1e O ° N en N N .N-I N I, N N N N O N N .N1 .r-I .N-1 N ° .4 ,, 1-1 N N e-I \ en N Z W 3 LL 3 z Z 3 W 3 ue 3 3 3 to H W 3 W W Z W 3 W 3 H 5• W 3 z W h W r to 3 W 3 N V1 H 3 wan N W to Z W Z H W Zen 3 3 wile eo m m eo m o CO Oo eD m m m eo m eo m m m .I eo Oo a1 m m eo eo 0o eo o m e0 moo coca m m m m .1 m Cl CO m m Co m oo .1 eo m m m m .. m eo m m ID to t0 t0 to N t0 to to to to ID tD t0 t0 t0 to to N to to to to to to to tD to N to to t0 to to t0 10 to to ID N to Io to to to to to Io N to Io Io to to 1N to t0 to to F F F F F F F F F F L L L F F L F F F L F F L F L F F F F F F F F L F F F F F F F F L L L L L L L I- L L F L L L L L F z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z > > D F D D >. > >- >F. > > >. > >- D{ D D D {> FD D D D D >. > > >F. > > > >� FD D D D D > > > > > > > > t�> > > > > > > > > > > > > > W G W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W LW ill W W G LU W W LU W G W W 10 LU L U.1W G W G W LU LIJ Ul W UJ LU UJ u u 41 " 111 1 1.1.1.1 I y y W yI- F F F F F 1- I- F F F F F F F F F- F F F F F F- F- F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 1- F F F ~ F F F . F F- I- F I- F I- < Q Q Q Q (. (7 l7 U' (7 t (7 V' O (7 l7 O O W U' W O (7 l7 (7 V' V' (7 U' (7 (7 V' l7 (7 O (7 (7 (7 U' (7 U' l7 (7 U' (7 O U' (7 W V' O l7 W (7 U' O W V' (7 0 (7 U' l7 O - z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W < o 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 W 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 J 0 U' 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V' 0 0 0 V' O W O W O W W 17 0 U' O 0 0 0 V' 0 0 0 0 U' 0 O Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 114 of 121 O .1 N .-I N .-1 0 N M N 0 a0 . 1\100 .-11-10 N 0 N 0 M .--I 001 N N N .Ni N N N 0 0 0 N 0 N 001 m N N On1 .--1 .-1 H .-1 .i N .i r-11--1 ,-1 ri H N .1 N .-1 00 CO 00 CO 00 00 00 CO CO 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CO 00 00 a a a a a a 00 a 00 o a o 013 00 00 00 a V DT 013 CO MMN M . M - M CN N N mN N N N N N.-1 .-I en . . N CO M N .-1 N CO 01 .i - M 01 M 0 In . M a n 0 a C7 a a M O en t t0 -i IX U. CO 0013 0 0 .n-1 .�-1 a N co K ID a a N N .N+ 1 1 o M O C 1 0 d .Mi N 011 ID O 0l N N .-1 .i N .-1 N 0 00 .-1 co 1 • e-1 OL K .i N 0011 F F H H a Fes- H ~ ~ .0-1 N 0011 .~-1 ~ 1- LL ~ O 00 00000 000 �{ 0000 10< 0 00 0 .0-1 lD LL LL co N t u_ O O O O 0 0 Cl t0 0 CO O O tD 0.-1 01 0 0 0 0 H N 0 0 .-1 0: 00 In In In 00 0_ 0_ 00 00 0! N ...1 N .i 0C 0_ 00 In .I N N 0_ In h f, .1 .i .i .i 1_ F.. .i .i 1- et 0C 0: 1- 1- 1- .i 00 (- .-1 , LL W In VI W LL u W W LL 1- 3 1• 1- LL LL LL W 1- 3 3 ty N O 0 LL LL LL LL. 0 0 LL 0 IL 1L 0 0 0 11_ LL U. LL o IY 0 0I�. 0F 0 0 6- 0 0 0 ,u.„ 0 0 0 O OIn 0 In In 1111 IIn 000 0 In In 0 11A N In N N W 00 In N N N II In .i .i N N N N .-1 .i n N .i N N N n -1 .i .1 N N N N .-1 N Z W N Z 3 Z W 3 3 W W W 3 3 Z 3 z 3 W W W to Z 01 01 CO 0 0 01 0 01 01 0 0 0 01 01 01 CO 01 CO 01 Cl 00 01 00 .i ID tD ID N N ID N ID ID N N N l0 ID tD tD ID tD tD ID tD ID tD N F" t t t t t t t i- 1- i- f- I- t t t t t t t t t t t z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z > > > > > > > >1... > > > > > > > >1� > >~ > > > >F > > WI Wl l-iWI W1 W1 W1 iiW1 W W1 G DJ W1 W1 LIP1 1iW1 U W1 t!iW1 1iWl W1 U DJ ILI DJ a a a w a a a a a a a A a a a a tt(9 a a a a a a a z• z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g o o 000000000000000000000000 O W 0 C 7 C 7 C 7 C 7 (9 (9 (9 (9W (9 (9 (9 (9 (9 (9 (9 (9 (9W O W Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 115 of 121 CO er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX(239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/lndex.aspx?page=774 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: Golden Gate Estates Civic Association MAILING ADDRESS 4701 Golden Gate Blvd. CITY Golden Gate STATE FL ZIP 34116 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: The Homeowner's Assoc. of Golden Gate Estates MAILING ADDRESS 441 24th Avenue NE CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34120 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP October 13, 2010 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 116 of 121 ' xfi 1.110 putblic is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting li L NAPLES DAILY NEWS t0 (je held b)� the E Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on March 31, 2014 at 5:30 p.m. Affidavit of Publicati at the Rig Cypress Island Fire Control & Rescue District State of Florida l',-;250 Ir inoltalee (load, Naples, 1 1 34120 Counties of Collier and Lee e, r 1 .' i X1.1 i * r. � Before the undersigned they serve as tl ". , 1 appeared Karen Doll,who on oath say ` ll Account Executive of the Naples Daily ' ` ' . , newspaper published at Naples, in Co . ` is '- distributed in Collier and Lee counties � � t attached copy of the advertising, being . r ,� - F PUBLIC NOTICE S � in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE ., , "x was published in said newspaper I tint= ,t l f t 5 ,r,* 4;a.' Site'1\4z-in`< 4 a �F Vii' .1% on March 17, 2014. , ,% 1 Subject Property: Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints is Affiant further says that the said Napl `located at the Northwest Corner of Intersection of Everglades published at Naples, in said Collier Cou Blvd. & Randall Blvd., Golden Gate Estates. newspaper has heretofore been corrtinu+ The property owner has submitted a Growth Management Plan County,Florida;distributed in Collier a each clay and has been entered as seconc Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1, a Small Scale amendment office in Naples, in said Collier County, to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth year next preceding the first publication Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use,and the Conditional advertisement; and affiant further says tl Use Petition CU-PL-20120002 615, fora church at a maximum promised any person, firm or corporatio size of 20,0000 square feet on +7.80 acres. commission or refund for the purpose o WE VALUE YOUR INPUT publication in the said newspaper. Business and property owners, residents and visitors are i welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with (Signature of affiant) the owner/developer and Collier County staff. 1-)\ R. Bruce Andress, i Roetzel&Andress, LPA Swe i to and subscribed.before me 850 Park Shore Drive, 3rd Floor T -120th day of .rch, ' 01.4 Naples, FL 34103 239.649.6200 , banderson@ralaw.com March 17.2014 N9,3.11.508.34_ — — --- — (Signature of notary public) 4 .%' CAROL POUDORA ? • : MY COMMISSION A EE 851758 o•-. ; ite EXPIRES:November 28,2014 t %V;ge X1;$1'• Banded Thai Pkhard Inw+ance Agony Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 117 of 121 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Comprehensive Plan Small Scale Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1 Conditional Use Petition CU-PL-20120002615 Neighborhood Information Meeting March 31, 2014, 5:30 p.m. Big Corkscrew Island Fire Department, 21520 Immokalee Rd, Naples, FL Name Address 4 I 1)(k ( 7 6 Yin (-01 1(:',V (a;I,`V1 DA- Ji \ 6AA/ -Mr n/(ti .Jnib vi:te() 1J�, (4) � ;'r � . T ',(l24iz / _,(C?{1,M Y�►�t c ►� L.D5 0,11,,r:r i-�r C)re-f r (\ f41-r.te 7,�r� Cr `/ i tai jG�� )47‹ ft✓.- , / 0 Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-clay Saints 07/01/2014 Page 118 of 121 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Project Overview The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints applications request a small scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Conditional Use for a church on the property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard. The total property is approximately 7.8 acres. The Comprehensive Plan currently allows for residential at 1 unit per 2.5 acres. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment application requests the use of a church with a maximum size of 20,000 SF. The proposed Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints meeting house will serve the existing congregation that is currently meeting at a Golden Gate school facility. All congregations have geographic boundaries and members are assigned to the meeting house within their boundary. This means the proposed chapel will be regularly used only by people who live within those defined boundaries. Meeting houses are design to accommodate approximately 230 members. Access to the church will be from Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard. Landscape buffers will be provided adjacent to both boulevards and a 75-foot buffer will be provided adjacent to residential properties. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 119 of 121 Proposed Growth Management Plan Text Amendment (XVII) 6. Everglades-Randall Subdistrict The Everglades-Randall Subdistrict is located on the northeast corner of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard and consists of 7.8 acres on Tract 115 and the east 150 ft. of Tract 116, Unit 69, Golden Gate Estates. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and related uses. Church-related day care use shall not be allowed. The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 20,000 square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area. A 75 ft. buffer shall be provided along the northern and western boundaries of the propoerty within which a septic tank drain field and water management facilities are permitted. 65 feet shall consist of native vegetation materials from the three vegetative strata to serve as a transitional area between the church and the adjacent residential tracts. Minimum yard requirements are for a corner lot and measured with two front setbacks and two side yard setbacks. One front yard setback will be 75 feet, the other front setback may be reduced to 37.5 feet. Side yards shall be a minimum of 75 feet. A minimum of a 10 feet wide Type B landscape buffer with native vegetation shall be provided along the parking edges as depicted on the site plan. Water management areas shall not be located in this buffer. A minimum of 15 feet wide Type D buffers shall be provided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. The parking lot shall provide for. (a) A maximum of parking 155 spaces, with 15 percentage in grass parking. (b) The throat depth of the access drives shall be 30 feet measured from the roadway edge of pavement. Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 120 of 121 Ake A t ¢, a ADJACENT ZONING: E €ri-w k i"r �L�i'aFn N , .: °x ° I i ''1 ' ?.' - o g no I.. k ., I Nr O r ; 1... & RNIINVS ■• 0d I �__ - —ea ln8.e.3dll,Ol—i 1 l I / m I%, U w r .- .-n ,r,,,,,,„,,,,,..,,,,,-:,,,-;,,-7,, I gI rt '1 1't I „ i z U l m n 2 Z arm, FY f .3 l ,,H O 1 l c . I • J 2 z N am}} L/ j Ip V Z l I -zM R y 6 o Z ^ ii� m ` : m__J ��� '.— W 1 I U r �l i p x ®i . ///ffffff ,,r N t o Zva s E ° - - - " ww lol o uFi i • (iii I c_._—_, .;.:::::::::::::::E:4-:r aitiffr'' ly , I a I:n {fray ff ff .?I �a3J!!9,O, 3d1,1,St , - 1 _ _ z gr N i co._ GA1B IIVONVN J -- � \ % i \ /�--- f p 3 IONINOZ 1N3JVfOV a / 11 1 111 C W 0 IF::: 111 6< li }'fib ' M ICI Iw[AL[btlAlKl-RVarM�1n Om Ow'wY�ICt lil-1VM10 LI Yb10[fUNw\'� Growth Management Plan Application CPSS-2012-1,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 07/01/2014 Page 121 of 121 Comprehensive Planning Memorandum November 16, 2012 Sent Via E-Mail Mr. Bruce Anderson Roetzel and Andress 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre-Third Floor Naples, FL 34103 RE: Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1, a Small Scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use for a church/place of worship at a maximum intensity of 20,0000 square feet on ±7.80 acres (Tract 115, Unit 69 and the East 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69 Golden Gate Estates). Dear Mr. Anderson: Pursuant to Paragraph B.2. of Resolution #97-431, this letter is to inform you that the referenced application is not sufficient. Below is the list of deficiencies that need to be corrected/addressed. APPLICATION AND EXHIBITS: Each deficiency below corresponds to the application numbers and letters. Generally Label all exhibits/maps and insert page numbers on all pages (except section dividers). I.D. Provide qualifications (or résumés) for all professionals providing information contained within the application. II.B Provide the list of officers and stockholders within the Corporation, and provide a copy of the Articles of Incorporation. II. G Mark the 'acquired' space and insert reference to Exhibit 1; and, delete the reference to Exhibit I in the 'leased' space. III.0 Insert "Rural Estates." III.D Delete "399" and insert "393." III.F Delete "Residential" and insert "Estates" III.G Insert "Residential" after"Vacant." IV.D. Delete "Estates and Estates Everglades-Randall Subdistrict" and insert "Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict" To "Estates - Mixed Use District, Conditional Uses Subdistrict (Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria)." Sufficiency/Substantive Adoption Memorandum CPSS-2012-1 Page 2 of 4 V.A.1 Insert "Exhibit 9" reference in the space provided. V.A.2 Insert "Exhibit 10" reference in the space provided. V.A.3 Insert "Exhibit 11" reference in the space provided. V.B.1 Insert "Exhibits 8 & 12" references in the space provided. V.C.1 Insert "Exhibit 13" reference in the space provided. V.C.2 Insert "Exhibit 13" reference in the space provided; provide a copy of the County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map with site delineated on map; and, provide correspondence to and from the Florida Dept. of State. V.E.2 Provide required map and insert Exhibit reference in space provided; and, delete the 'N/A' reference. V.E.3 Provide the required information, and insert the Exhibit reference in the space provided; and, delete the 'N/A' reference. (Narrative should address all items listed. If a particular service provider is not applicable to the project (such as schools) an explanation should be provided. If impact fees will be paid to cover costs of services, etc. then an explanation should be provided.) V.F.1 Insert "Exhibit 14" reference in the space provided. V.F.2 Insert "Exhibit 11" reference in the space provided. V.G.3 Insert "Exhibit 3" reference in the space provided. V.G.4 Insert "Exhibit 3" reference in the space provided. Exhibit 2 1st and 2nd paragraphs are identical - delete 1 of the 2 paragraphs; provide explanation/detail/characteristics of `limited uses' noted in paragraph 3 (e.g. hours of operation, days of operation, etc.); paragraph 7, delete reference to 'arterial roads' and replace with 'rural minor collectors' and delete 'Estates' from 'Golden Gate Area Master Plan' reference; and, last paragraph, delete reference to new subdistrict and replace with reference to 'Conditional Uses Subdistrict,Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria.' Exhibit 4 Maps of Church and Church Member Locations • Provide legible maps with the following: 1) legend; 2) data source; 3) north arrow; 4) scale; 5) geographical boundaries for each church/congregation; and, 6) streets (with street names) clearly marked. Exhibit 5 Item e) 5.-Delete the phrase, "Everglades-Randall Subdistrict-." Exhibit 6 Data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use: The Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan prohibits new Estates zoning conditional uses for churches/places of worship, except when located within a Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional use area or within a Transitional Conditional Use area. • The subject Growth Management Plan amendment proposes to allow conditional use development within a prohibition area. Explain the proposed allowance for a conditional use within this area (why was the subject site 2 G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2012 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS-2012-1 church in GGE\Sufficiency Reviews\CP-2012-1,Sufficiency Letter.docx Sufficiency/Substantive Adoption Memorandum CPSS-2012-1 Page 3 of 4 chosen - are other sites of similar size, location, accessibility to subject congregation available with or without the need for a Plan amendment?). • Provide an analysis of all GGAMP Neighborhood/Transitional Conditional Use sites proximate to the proposed site - all sites east of Collier Blvd. (i.e. provide acreage calculations for each site; expansion opportunities; and, narrative regarding the suitability of each site for the proposed land use.) • Provide an assessment of all commercial nodes/Subdistricts in the Estates designation (east of Collier Blvd.), and the Orange Tree PUD/Orange Blossom Ranch PUD to determine the availability/suitability of sites for the proposed land use. • Provide an assessment of all agricultural lands proximate to the Estates designation and subject congregation to determine the availability/suitability of sites for the proposed land use (provide parcel listing and acreages). • Exhibit 2 contains a reference to the 'geographic boundaries' for each church/congregation; provide all existing church locations (and proposed church location) - modify Exhibit 4 maps, delineate the geographic boundaries for each church; note capacity of each church -state if church is at capacity, over or has available capacity; and, provide optimum distances that may be traveled by members of each church to meet worship/religious objectives. Exhibit 7 Public Facilities • Potable Water: provide calculations for existing conditions (residential - gpd) and proposed change (church/place of worship-gpd). • Sanitary Sewer: provide calculations for existing conditions (residential - gpd) and proposed change (church/place of worship-gpd). • Arterial and Collector Roads (Refer to additional staff comments below). • Solid Waste: provide calculations for existing conditions (residential - cy/yr) and proposed change (church/place of worship-cy/yr). Additional Staff Comments Stephen Lenberaer, Senior Environmental Specialist, Surface Water and Environmental Planning: In accordance with Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1.1 and Section 3.05.07 of the Land Development Code (LDC), 15 percent of the native vegetation is required retained on-site if the property is developed as a church. Single-family home sites, as currently allowed in the Estate Zoning District, are exempt from this requirement. Construction of the septic tank drain field and stormwater retention within the 75 foot wide landscape buffed would have to occur outside the preserve. The subject property is located partially within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone ST/WS-4 (3.06.00 LDC). Uses for a church would not be expected to be regulated by this Overlay. John Podczerwinsky, Dev. Review Project Manager, Transportation Planning Section: 3 G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2012 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS-2012-1 church in GGE\Sufficiency Reviews\CP-2012-1,Sufficiency Letter.docx Sufficiency/Substantive Adoption Memorandum CPSS-2012-1 Page 4 of 4 Although the applicant addresses the impacts to the Arterial and Collector Roadway network on Exhibit 7, the paragraph they have provided is insufficient to accomplish the intended purpose. To demonstrate that the LOS is not degraded, a Traffic Impact Study, consistent with Ord. 09-19 (TIS Guidelines) will be required for review purposes. Additionally, there is no access exhibit that has been submitted with the application. Although amendments of this type do not establish access rights, it is reasonable to request an access management plan demonstrating all proposed/planned access locations in order to determine if A) The forthcoming TIS is reasonable, and B) If the project can function as intended with consideration for the adjacent intersection. Certain access management requirements exist that could impact the functional design of the intended use. Therefore, Transportation Review Staff recommends that this project be found "Insufficient" for review purposes until an Access Exhibit and a Traffic Impact Statement are both included. The TIS will also require staff-approved methodology notes. Aaron Cromer, Principal Project Manager, Public Utilities Engineering: At this time, Public Utilities has no issues with the application. The request is outside of our existing district boundaries. Solid and Hazardous Waste will require the standard operations to be followed to meet compliance. The original application is available for pick-up. Once the petition has been modified/enhanced to address the above items, please re-submit the original plus two copies, all properly assembled, for a second sufficiency/substantive review. Paragraph B.3. of Resolution #97-431 provides 30 days (December 17, 2012) for you to respond to this letter with supplemental data. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 239.252.2466 or via email at michelemosca @collieraov.net. Regard /Michele R./,:. ca, Al • Principal ' anner cc: Nick Casalanguida, Administrator, Growth Management Division Michael Bosi, AICP, Interim Planning and Zoning Director David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Plan Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section CPSS-2012-1 File 4 G:\ODES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2012 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS-2012-1 church in GGE\Sufficiency Reviews\CP-2012-1,Sufficiency Letter.docx o +e-r- Gou Comprehensive Planning Memorandum February 22, 2013 Sent Via E-Mail Ms. Anita Jenkins, AICP J.R. Evans Engineering 23150 Fashion Drive,Ste. 242 Estero, FL 33928 RE: Staff summary notes from the February 14, 2013 landscape/buffer meeting relative to Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1, a small-scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use for a church/place of worship at a maximum intensity of 20,0000 square feet on +7.80 acres (Tract 115, Unit 69 and the East 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69 Golden Gate Estates) Dear Ms. Jenkins: Below is the list of the landscape/buffer discussion items addressed by staff at a recent meeting. • The proposed project shall include a 75 feet wide buffer adjacent to the northern and western residential tracts. A minimum of a 10 feet wide,Type B landscape buffer,without water management areas, shall be provided along the developed areas (adjacent to the parking area depicted on the site plan).The remaining 65 feet shall consist of native vegetation to serve as a transitional area between the proposed development and the adjacent residential tracts. • Staff encourages the developer to use plant materials from the three strata- groundcover, mid-story and canopy-within the 65 feet wide buffer area. • Depending on the hydro-periods anticipated on site,staff encourages the developer to use varying plant materials, not solely Cypress. • The sanitary drain field shall not be located within the 10 feet wide landscape areas adjacent to parking/development areas. • An opacity percentage should be established for two periods-at planting and within 1 year after planting-for the 65 feet wide transitional buffer area. • Applicant is encouraged to provide enhanced buffering, using native vegetation, adjacent to the rights-of way, to screen parking and development areas, as well as maintain the rural character of the area. • Native Florida plantings are encouraged to be used throughout the site; however, staff recommends that Cypress and Pines not be used exclusively. • Within the native vegetation preserve, the applicant is encouraged to enhance the preserve area with mid-story plant materials (e.g. Wax Myrtle, Coco Plum, Myrsine, etc.). Please call me at 239.252.2466 should you have any questions. Regards/ /■ ' oe ' ''o; ., AICP Principal Planner cc: CPSS-2013-1 File Zik J,R. EVANS ENGINEERING July 15, 2013 Ms. Michele R. Mosca, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 RE: Response to Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1, a Small Scale amendment to the Golden Gate Adea Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan to allow a Con•itional Use for a church/place of worship at a maximum intensity of 20,0100 °quare feet on +7\8(1 acres (Tract 115, Unit 69 and the East 150 feet of Tract :, Unit 69 Golden Ga e Estates). Dear Ms. Mosca: Thank you for your review of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Church) Growth Management Plan application as reference above. We have provided herein an updated application and additional information to respond to the review questions and suggestions. In doing so, we further demonstrate the Church's need for a location within Golden Gate Estates, and provide additional supportive data and analysis to warrant the change to the Growth Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use in the proposed location of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard. Currently, the Church's members within the Golden Gate Estates boundary are meeting in a temporary location with inadequate facilities. Limited seating, commotion and other symptoms of overcrowding all combine to substantially impair both the ability to worship and the quality of services. Their other churches in the Golden Gate area have reached membership capacity. Finding a suitable location to meet the need of a permenant church proved to be a challenge. Parcels within Golden Gate Estates that allow a church, designated as a Conditional Use within the Estates District, is limited to a few Neighborhood Centers and Transitional Areas where property is not currently for sale. Foregoing the opportunity to locate within a Neighborhood Center or Transition Area the Church sought other property within Golden Gate Estates area suitable and proximate to the membership. The subject property was one considered and ultimately found to meet the needs of the church. In order for the church to be able to build on the property, a land use change is necessary. The subject property is designated Estates, however, due to a change in conditions, particularly the County's transportation plan for a 6-lane Randall Boulevard 9nd a 4-lane Everglades Boulevard, this corner lot is no longer suitable for residential use and a_chang9rfo the Growth Management Plan is warranted to allow a church. 23150 Fashion Drive,Ste, 242, Estero, FL 33928 C 239.825.9322 I F 239,288.2537 Ana@ re.ansengineering.com www.jrevansenginccring,corn Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Response to Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1 Page 2 In response to other comments, questions and suggestions in the review letter dated November 16, 2012, following we have copied herein the specific review comments and provided a response in bold. APPLICATION AND EXHIBITS: Each deficiency below corresponds to the application numbers and letters. Generally Label all exhibits/maps and insert page numbers on all pages (except section dividers). Response: This request has been addressed in the resubmittal. I.D. Provide qualifications (or résumés) for all professionals providing information contained within the application. Response: Professional qualifications have been provided as Exhibit 1. II.B Provide the list of officers and stockholders within the Corporation, and provide a copy of the Articles of Incorporation. Response: The requested Articles of Incorporation have been provided as Exhibit 2. There are no stockholders to list. II. G Mark the `acquired' space and insert reference to Exhibit 1; and, delete the reference to Exhibit I in the `leased' space. Response: The application has been revised. III.0 Insert"Rural Estates." Response: The application has been revised. III.D Delete "399" and insert"393." Response: The application has been revised. I I I.F Delete "Residential" and insert"Estates" Response: The application has been revised. III.G Insert"Residential" after"Vacant." Response: The application has been revised. IV.D. Delete "Estates and Estates Everglades-Randall Subdistrict" and insert "Estates — Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict" To "Estates — Mixed Use District, Conditional Uses Subdistrict (Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria)." Response: Following further consideration and direction by Comprehensive Planning staff, the application remains as first submitted, requesting a small scale amendment to provide for a subdistrict with specific development standards. Ms.Michele Mosca,AICP Response to Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1 Page 3 V.A.1 Insert"Exhibit 9" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised. V.A.2 Insert"Exhibit 10" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised. V.A.3 Insert"Exhibit 11" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised. V.B.1 Insert"Exhibits 8 & 12" references in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised V.C.1 Insert"Exhibit 13" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised. V.C.2 Insert "Exhibit 13" reference in the space provided; provide a copy of the County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map with site delineated on map; and, provide correspondence to and from the Florida Dept. of State. Response: The application has been revised. V.E.2 Provide required map and insert Exhibit reference in space provided; and, delete the 'N/A' reference. Response: The requested map has been included. V.E.3 Provide the required information, and insert the Exhibit reference in the space provided; and, delete the 'N/A' reference. (Narrative should address all items listed. If a particular service provider is not applicable to the project (such as schools) an explanation should be provided. If impact fees will be paid to cover costs of services, etc. then an explanation should be provided.) Response: The requested information has been included in Exhibit 5.H. V.F.1 Insert"Exhibit 14" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised. V.F.2 Insert"Exhibit 11" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised. V.G.3 Insert"Exhibit 3" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised. V.G.4 Insert"Exhibit 3" reference in the space provided. Response: The application has been revised.' Exhibit 2 1st and 2nd paragraphs are identical — delete 1 of the 2 paragraphs; provide explanation/detail/characteristics of `limited uses' noted in paragraph 3 (e.g. hours of operation, days of operation, etc.); paragraph 7, delete reference to Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Response to Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1 Page 4 `arterial roads' and replace with `rural minor collectors' and delete 'Estates' from 'Golden Gate Area Master Plan' reference; and, last paragraph, delete reference to new subdistrict and replace with reference to 'Conditional Uses Subdistrict, Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria.' Response: The application has been revised. Exhibit 4 Maps of Church and Church Member Locations • Provide legible maps with the following: 1) legend; 2) data source; 3) north arrow; 4) scale; 5) geographical boundaries for each church/congregation; and, 6) streets (with street names) clearly marked. Response: The maps have been revised. See Map 4.A and 4.B Exhibit 5 Item e) 5. — Delete the phrase, "Everglades-Randall Subdistrict." Response: The application has been revised. Exhibit 6 Data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use: The Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan prohibits new Estates zoning conditional uses for churches/places of worship, except when located within a Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional use area or within a Transitional Conditional Use area. • The subject Growth Management Plan amendment proposes to allow conditional use development within a prohibition area. Explain the proposed allowance for a conditional use within this area (why was the subject site chosen — are other sites of similar size, location, accessibility to subject congregation available with or without the need for a Plan amendment?). • Provide an analysis of all GGAMP Neighborhood/Transitional Conditional Use sites proximate to the proposed site — all sites east of Collier Blvd. (i.e. provide acreage calculations for each site; expansion opportunities; and, narrative regarding the suitability of each site for the proposed land use.) • Provide an assessment of all commercial nodes/Subdistricts in the Estates designation (east of Collier Blvd.), and the Orange Tree PUD/Orange Blossom Ranch PUD to determine the availability/suitability of sites for the proposed land use. • Provide an assessment of all agricultural lands proximate to the Estates designation and subject congregation to determine the availability/suitability of sites for the proposed land use (provide parcel listing and acreages). • Exhibit 2 contains a reference to the 'geographic boundaries' for each church/congregation; provide all existing church locations (and proposed church location) — modify Exhibit 4 maps, delineate the geographic boundaries for each church; note capacity of each church — state if church is at capacity, over or has available capacity; and, provide optimum distances that may be traveled by members of each church to meet worship/religious objecti cam:— he supportive data and analysis is included in the exhibits under Tab 4. Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Response to Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1 Page 5 Exhibit 7 Public Facilities • Potable Water: provide calculations for existing conditions (residential - gpd) and proposed change (church/place of worship —gpd). Response: o Existing Conditions (Residential): Potable water flows are assumed to be 10% over the estimated sewage flows. Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for Residences with "4 Bedrooms with 2251-3300 sq. ft. of building area" a sewage flow of 400 gpd is estimated. With the subject project encompassing two (2) residential single-family lots, the total estimated average sewage flow is 800 gpd. Therefore, with an additional 10% to account for potable water flows, the total estimated average potable water flow for existing conditions (residential single-family) is 880 gpd. o Proposed Change (Church/Place of Worship): Potable water flows are assumed to be 10% over the estimated sewage flows. Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for "Churches per seat" a sewage flow of 3 gpd/seat is estimated. With the subject project proposing approximately 230 seats, the total estimated average sewage flow is 690 gpd. Therefore, with an additional 10% to account for potable water flows, the total estimated average potable water flow for proposed conditions (church/place of worship) is 759 gpd. • Sanitary Sewer: provide calculations for existing conditions (residential - gpd) and proposed change (church/place of worship—gpd). Response: o Existing Conditions (Residential): Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for Residences with "4 Bedrooms with 2251-3300 sq. ft. of building area" a sewage flow of 400 gpd is estimated. With the subject project encompassing two (2) residential single-family lots, the total estimated average sewage flow for existing conditions (residential single-family) is 800 gpd. o Proposed Change (Church/Place of Worship): Per F.A.C. Chapter 64E-6.008 for"Churches per seat" a sewage flow of 3 gpd/seat is estimated. With the subject project proposing approximately 230 seats, the total estimated average sewage flow is 690 gpd. • Arterial and Collector Roads (Refer to additional staff comments below). Response: See the Transportation Impact Statement under Exhibit 6.A Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Response to Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1 Page 6 • Solid Waste: provide calculations for existing conditions (residential — cy/yr) and proposed change (church/place of worship—cy/yr). Response: Per the Solid Waste Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan, solid waste LOS standards are based on a per capita tonnage. Since the proposed project will not generate a population increase, the proposed project will have no impact on the solid waste disposal capability of Collier County. Additional Staff Comments Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist, Surface Water and Environmental Planning: In accordance with Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) Policy 6.1.1 and Section 3.05.07 of the Land Development Code (LDC), 15 percent of the native vegetation is required retained on-site if the property is developed as a church. Single-family home sites, as currently allowed in the Estate Zoning District, are exempt from this requirement. Construction of the septic tank drain field and stormwater retention within the 75 foot wide landscape buffed would have to occur outside the preserve. The subject property is located partially within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone ST/WS-4 (3.06.00 LDC). Uses for a church would not be expected to be regulated by this Overlay. Response: The companion Conditional Use application, CU- PL20120002615, includes a Conceptual Master Plan, included herein for information as Exhibit 6.B. The Master Plan addresses the requirements noted above. John Podczerwinsky, Dev. Review Project Manager, Transportation Planning Section: Although the applicant addresses the impacts to the Arterial and Collector Roadway network on Exhibit 7, the paragraph they have provided is insufficient to accomplish the intended purpose. To demonstrate that the LOS is not degraded, a Traffic Impact Study, consistent with Ord. 09-19 (TIS Guidelines)will be required for review purposes. Additionally, there is no access exhibit that has been submitted with the application. Although amendments of this type do not establish access rights, it is reasonable to request an access management plan demonstrating all proposed/planned access locations in order to determine if A) The forthcoming TIS is reasonable, and B) If the project can function as intended with consideration for the adjacent intersection. Certain access management requirements exist that could impact the functional design of the intended use. Therefore, Transportation Review Staff recommends that this project be found "Insufficient" for review purposes until an Access Exhibit and a Traffic Impact Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Response to Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition CPSS-2012-1 Page 7 Statement are both included. The TIS will also require staff-approved methodology notes. Response: A TIS was provided with the companion Conditional Use application CU-PL20120002615 and has also been included with this response and resubmittal as Exhibit 6.A. The Conditional Use Conceptual Master Plan shows the proposed church access and has been included herein to address the request for an access exhibit. See Exhibit 6.B. Aaron Cromer, Principal Project Manager, Public Utilities Engineering: At this time, Public Utilities has no issues with the application. The request is outside of our existing district boundaries. Solid and Hazardous Waste will require the standard operations to be followed to meet compliance. Sincen"iy, /1 4) Anita L. Jenkins, ,. CP Director of Plan n �g J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. Cc: Rick Piacente, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Bruce Anderson, Roetzel & Andress Jim Banks, Banks Transportation Engineering Michael Herrera, J.R. Evans Engineering, P.A. Tim Hall, Turrell & Associates Enclosures Coco oir of rnty Comprehensive Planning Memorandum August 22, 2013 Sent Via E-Mail Mr. Bruce Anderson Roetzel and Andress 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre—Third Floor Naples, FL 34103 and Ms. Anita Jenkins, AICP J.R. Evans Engineering 23150 Fashion Drive,Ste. 242 Estero, FL 33928 RE: 2nd Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1, a Small Scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use for a church/place of worship at a maximum intensity of 20,000 square feet on ±7.80 acres (Tract 115, Unit 69 and the East 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69 Golden Gate Estates). Dear Mr. Anderson and Ms. Jenkins: Pursuant to Paragraph B.2. of Resolution #12-234, this letter is to inform you that the referenced application is not sufficient. Below is the list of deficiencies that need to be corrected/addressed. APPLICATION AND EXHIBITS: Each deficiency below corresponds to the application numbers and letters, Exhibits, and Maps. Cover Letter Page 1, paragraph 3, refers to Generally Remove all tabs from submittal (section dividers should remain), as the document will be inserted into tabbed binders for CCPC and BCC hearings; and, sequentially number all pages within each section(except section dividers) —refer to E.5.G numbering, E5-11 numbering duplication, and, inconsistent and limited page numbering following Exhibit S.K. I.A. Delete, "Corp. Presiding Bishop LDS Church" and replace with, "Richard Piacente" as the authorized applicant for the petition II.G. Delete reference to "Exhibit 5K" and replace with reference to "Exhibit 5J or Exhibit 3" IV.B. Provide the referenced "Exhibit 4.1" V.C.2 Provide the listed species survey Sufficiency Adoption Memorandum CPSS-2012-1 Page 2 of 5 V.C.2 Provide a copy of the County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map with site delineated on map; and, provide correspondence to and from the Florida Dept. of State- Florida Master Site File V.D.4 Insert a reference to Exhibit 4 Application Remove pages 7 (letter of authorization with Exhibit 5k reference) and 8 (blank page) Exhibit 4 Data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use: The Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan prohibits new Estates zoning conditional uses for churches/places of worship, except when located within a Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional use area or within a Transitional Conditional Use area. • Insert legible maps (or remove from Exhibit) • Everglades-Randall Boulevard Subdistrict text: • Paragraph 1 - the term related church uses is too broad - these uses should be specified and limited within the Subdistrict text • Paragraph 2 - provide the maximum height for all proposed appurtenances, such as a steeple (if proposed appurtenances exceed maximum building heights (30 feet) allowed in the Estates zoning, provide justification for allowance, including how this preserves the rural character of the area.) • Paragraph 3- provide opacity percentages at planting and within 1- year to ensure rural character is maintained (refer to previously provided memorandum dated, 2/22/13) s:• Paragraphs 4 and 5 - the proposed "urban" buffers should be enhanced to ensure the rural character of the area is maintained (refer to previously provided memorandum dated, 2/22/13); accordingly, provide provisions for enhanced buffers within the Subdistrict text • Staff may recommend further text changes subsequent to a sufficiency finding • Page E4-4 (text ref. to Exhibit 6-B) and Conditional Use Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit 6-B): • The conceptual plan provided within the GMPA differs from that provided within the CU submittal; please revise to be consistent • So as to maintain the rural character of the area, insert parking standards within the Subdistrict text to limit the number of parking spaces to no greater than that required by the Land Development Code • Establish building setbacks within the Subdistrict text (given the proposed size of the building, these setbacks should be sufficient to help maintain rural character) • As previously requested, provide an analysis of all GGAMP Neighborhood/Transitional Conditional Use sites proximate to the proposed site - all sites east of Collier Blvd., i.e. provide acreage calculations for each site; expansion opportunities; and, narrative regarding the suitability of each 2 G:\ODES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2012 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS-2012-1 church in GGE\Sufficiency Reviews\CP-2012-1,2nd Sufficiency Letter.docx Sufficiency Adoption Memorandum CPSS-2012-1 Page 3 of 5 site for the proposed land use. (A table may be appropriate for representing these data.) • As previously requested, provide an assessment of all commercial nodes/Subdistricts in the Estates designation (east of Collier Blvd.); and, an analysis of lands within the Orange Tree PUD/Orange Blossom Ranch PUD to determine the availability and/or suitability of sites for the proposed land use. (A table may be appropriate for representing these data.) [Based on the data provided in the re-submittal, dated July 15, 2103, it appears that the Orange Tree Settlement Area is centrally located to the membership and accessible by major roadways.] • As previously requested, provide an assessment of all agricultural lands (The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District along the Immokalee Road corridor) proximate to the Estates designation and subject congregation to determine the availability and/or suitability of sites for the proposed land use (provide parcel listing and acreages). (A table may be appropriate for representing these data.) [Based on the data provided in the re-submittal, dated July 15, 2103, it appears that agricultural lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District along the Immokalee Road corridor are centrally located to the membership and accessible by major roadways.] Maps 4A-4C/ Exhibit 4 text (page E4-1) refers to "three distinct boundary areas"; however, Exhibit 4 maps 4.B and 4.C. appear to have a combined lmmokalee and Golden Gate Branch; provide clarification Map 4A Membership Location Map • Identify major roadways within the "Golden Gate Estates Branch" boundary, e.g. Immokalee Rd., Everglades Blvd., Oil Well Rd., Randall Blvd., etc. Map 4B Golden Gate Estates Branch-Members Location Map • As previously requested, provide the capacity of each church; provide Immokalee church location and state if this church is at capacity, over capacity or has available capacity; and, provide optimum distances traveled by members of each church to meet worship/religious objectives (data may be best addressed in the Exhibit 4 text) • Delineate the Immokalee Branch boundary Map 4C Golden Gate Estates Branch-Golden Gate Area Master Plan Map • Revise map to accurately reflect the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundary; spell-out text in legend and table; correct parcel and acreage count for the Randall Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict; and delineate the Immokalee Branch boundary Exhibit 5.K Provide a Notarized Letter of Authorization for J.R. Evans Engineering (required for all Agents listed in Section I.B. of the GMPA application) 3 G:\ODES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2012 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS-2012-1 church in GGE\Sufficiency Reviews\CP-2012-1,2nd Sufficiency Letter.docx Sufficiency Adoption Memorandum CPSS-2012-1 Page 4 of 5 Exhibit 7 Public Facilities Note: If the proposed project includes cooking facilities and/or classrooms/ offices/etc. with sanitary facilities, then the public facilities impacts for water and wastewater should be calculated at 5gpd/seat, not 3gpd/seat as provided. If the referenced uses are not proposed to be included within the project, please note the exclusion(s) within the water and wastewater analysis. Additional Staff Comments Stephen Lenberger,Senior Environmental Specialist, Surface Water and Environmental Planning: In accordance with Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1.1 and Section 3.05.07 of the Land Development Code (LDC), 15 percent of the native vegetation is required to be retained on-site, if developed as a church.Single-family homes as currently allowed on the property are exempt from this requirement. Floodplain compensation areas may be planted with native vegetation in accordance with the criteria in the LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.e to help meet the native vegetation retention requirement. The subject property is located partially within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone ST/WS-4 (3.06.00 LDC). Typical church uses would not be expected to be regulated by this Overlay. Surveying for listed species survey took place from November, 2011 to January, 2013 and approximately 15 hours were devoted to wildlife survey. No listed species or evidence of listed species were observed on the project site. Given the location and altered hydrology of the site, the property would likely offer, at best, limited potential utilization for foraging birds and transient species. A letter from the Florida Master Site File regarding previously recorded cultural resources lists no previously recorded cultural resources in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East. The project will be subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by CCME Policy 11.1.3.The provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the LDC. The proposed GMP amendment will have no affect on the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). John Podczenvinsky, Dev. Review Project Manager, Transportation Planning Section: The proposed master plan included with the submittal is not consistent with Objective 3 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Refer to Policies 3.1 and 3.3. Show all proposed future right-of-way reservations for a six-lane Randal Boulevard (180' Right of Way) and a four-lane Everglades Boulevard (200' Right of Way) to become consistent with the County's 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. 4 G:\ODES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2012 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS-2012-1 church in GGE\Sufficiency Reviews\CP-2012-1,2nd Sufficiency Letter.docx Sufficiency Adoption Memorandum CPSS-2012-1 Page 5 of 5 Aaron Cromer, Principal Project Manager, Public Utilities Engineering: At this time, Public Utilities has no issues with the application. The request is outside of the existing water and sewer district boundaries. Pollution Control staff: (Drew Morris,Sabas Figueroa and Richard Orth) Pollution control staff reviewed the proposed LDS Church in Golden Gate Estates because the project site is located within the County Well Field Protection Zone (WFPZ) 4 and is not connected to any municipality for water and sewer services. Because the project is proposing to use an On-site Sewage Disposal System the Ground Water Protection Ordinance requires the development to adhere to all State FDEP and/or DOH requirements for setback distances from public/private water supply wells, wastewater treatment design and effluent disposal for this project to include any industrial wastewater discharges from the water treatment system. However, groundwater monitoring and high level disinfection standards may be a State FDEP/DOH regulatory requirement if this site is required to be permitted as a new domestic wastewater treatment facility with a reverse osmosis (RO) industrial wastewater component from the water treatment system. Also, be aware of the language in 3.06.12.K(4) of the L.D.C. that addresses storing hazardous products in WFPZ 4. In summary, the ordinance states that no hazardous wastes/products are to be released or discharged into any stormwater systems, on-site sewage disposal system, or any soil or water bodies. It also states that all hazardous wastes must be disposed of in accordance with applicable law and that all hazardous waste discharges exceeding 50 gallons be reported to the county within 48 hours of discovery. Once the petition has been modified to address the above items, please re-submit three copies, all properly assembled, for a final sufficiency review. Resolution #12-234 provides 30 days (September 20, 2013) for you to respond to this letter with supplemental data. Should you have any questions or want to schedule a meeting to discuss staff comments, please contact me at 239.252.2466 or via email at michelemosca @colliergov.net. Regard ele R. A.sca, AICP Principal Planner cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Planning and Zoning Director David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Plan Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section CPSS-2012-1 File 5 G:\ODES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2012 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS-2012-1 church in GGE\Sufficiency Reviews\CP-2012-1,2nd Sufficiency Letter.docx FOCUSED YOU. 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34103 DIRECT DIAL 239.649.2708 PHONE 239.649.6200 FAX 239.261.3659 banderson @ralaw.com W W W.RALAW.COM December 6,2013 Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Principle Planner Comprehensive Planning 2800 N.Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 Re: Response to 2nd Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition P120110002626/CPSS-2012-1, a Small Scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use for a church/place of worship at a maximum intensity of 20,000 square feet on 7.80 +/-acres (Tract 115, Unit 69 and the East 150 feet of Tract 116,Unit 69 Golden Gate Estates). Dear Ms.Mosca: To address the review comments provided we have copied each comment below, and follow it with our"Response"noted in bold. We find that these responses,together with all information previously provided with this application demonstrates this Growth Management Plan amendment is warranted to allow for a Conditional Use for a church at the subject intersection of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. The warrants include: 1) the unavailability of property within existing and designated Conditional Use and Transitional Use areas, 2) a.significant change in the Golden Gate Estates roadway conditions with the County's plan to expand,Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard to multiple- lane highways, 3) intersection and roadway expansion creates undesirable conditions for residential use, and 4) the proposed church use is compatible with Estate uses and compatible with the change in intersection and roadway conditions. We look forward to scheduling the neighborhood information meeting and public hearings for this project. County review comments and responses follow. County Comments: Generally. Remove all tabs from submittal (section dividers should remain), as the document will be inserted into tabbed binders for CCPC and BCC hearings; and,sequentially number all pages within each section( except section dividers)- refer to E.5.G numbering, E5-11 numbering duplication, and, inconsistent and limited page numbering following Exhibit 5.K. Response-The application has been organized as requested. ROETZEL&ANDRESS CHICAGO WASHINGTON,D.C. CLEVELAND TOLEDO AKRON COLUMBUS CINCINNATI A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ORLANDO FORT MYERS NAPLES FORT LAUDERDALE TALLAHASSEE NEW YORK Ms.Michele Mosca,AICP Principle Planner Comprehensive Planning Page 2 December 6,2013 I.A. Delete, "Corp. Presiding Bishop LDS Church" and replace with, "Richard Piacente" as the authorized applicant for the petition Response—The petitioner elects to remain as shown on the application without revision. JIG. Delete reference to"Exhibit 5K"and replace with reference to"Exhibit 5J or Exhibit 3" Response—The application reference has been revised to 5J. IV.B. Provide the referenced"Exhibit 4.1" Response—The Exhibit 4.1 is attached. V.C.2 Provide the Iisted species survey Response— The Listed Species survey, included in the companion Conditional Use application, is attached as Exhibit 5.K. V.C.2' Provide a copy of the County's Historical/Archaeological Probability Map with site delineated on map; and, provide correspondence to and from the Florida Dept. of State-Florida Master Site File Response This has been previously addressed. See Steven Lenberger's comments on page 7, "A letter from the Florida Master Site File regarding previously recorded cultural resources lists no previously recorded cultural resources in Section 19,Township 48 South,Range 28 East. The project will be subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by CCME Policy 11 .1 .3.The provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the LDC." V.D.4 Insert a reference to Exhibit 4 Response—A reference has been included. Application Remove pages 7(letter of authorization with Exhibit 5k reference)and 8 Response—Blank pages have been removed. Exhibit 4 Data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use: The Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan prohibits new Estates zoning conditional uses for churches/places of worship, except when located within a Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional use area or within a Transitional Conditional Use area. • Insert legible maps(or remove from Exhibit) Response—Smaller reference maps were removed leaving only 11X17 maps. • Everglades-Randall Boulevard Subdistrict text Paragraph 1 -the term related church uses is too broad-these uses should be specified and limited within the Subdistrict text Response: The text has been revised replacing "related church uses" with "customary accessory uses." • Paragraph 2 - provide the maximum height for all proposed appurtenances, such as a steeple (if proposed appurtenances exceed maximum building heights (30 feet) allowed in the Estates zoning, provide justification for allowance, including how this preserves the rural character of the area.) Response—The following has been added to paragraph 2,"Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 60 feet." Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Principle Planner Comprehensive Planning Page 3 December 6,2013 • Paragraph 3 -provide opacity percentages at planting and within 1-year to ensure rural character is maintained(refer to previously provided memorandum dated,2/22/13) Response —The GMPA text provides "65 feet shall consist of native vegetation materials from the three vegetative strata to serve as a transitional area between the church and the adjacent residential tracts." Additional detail of the three vegetative strata and plant spacing is included in the companion Conditional Use application. • Paragraphs 4 and 5 - the proposed "urban" buffers should be enhanced to ensure the rural character of the area is maintained (refer to previously provided memorandum dated, 2/22/13); accordingly,provide provisions for enhanced buffers within the Subdistrict text. Response - The G11PA text provides for "65 feet shall consist of native vegetation materials from the three vegetative strata to serve as a transitional area between the church and the adjacent residential tracts." Additional detail of the three vegetative strata and plant spacing is included in the companion Conditional Use application. A minimum of a 10 feet wide Type B landscape buffer with native vegetation shall be provided along the parking edges as depicted on the site plan. Water management areas shall not be located in this buffer. A minimum of 15 feet wide Type D buffers shall be provided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. No further revisions are proposed. • Page E4-4(text ref.to Exhibit 6-B)and Conditional Use Conceptual Master Plan(Exhibit 6-B): Response—reference removed. • The conceptual plan provided within the GMPA differs from that provided within the CU submittal; please revise to be consistent Response-The attached conceptual plan is consistent with CU submittal. • So as to maintain the rural character of the area, insert parking standards within the Subdistrict text to limit the number of parking spaces to no greater than that required by the Land Development Code. Response - The following language was added to the Subdistrict text to address the parking needs for the LDS Church,and the conditions agreed to with County staff Reed Jarvi and Hiedi Ashton- Cicko as included in the attached Developers Contribution Agreement. The parking lot shall provide for. (a) A maximum of 245 parking spaces,with 15 percentage in grass parking. (b) The throat depth of the access drives shall be 30 feet measured from the roadway edge of pavement. (c) The landscape required in the parking areas shall be provided at one tree diamond per 10 parking spaces or one landscape island per 21 parking spaces. The amount of reduced Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Principle Planner Comprehensive Planning Page 4 December 6,2013 landscape in the parking areas has been compensated for by increasing the perimeter boundary landscape buffer and/or landscape adjacent to any building constructed on the property. Terminal landscape islands shall be provided per the Land Development Code requirements. • Establish building setbacks within the Subdistrict text (given the proposed size of the building, these setbacks should be sufficient to help maintain rural character) Response-The following language was added to the Subdistrict text,"Minimum yard requirements are for a corner lot and measured with two front setbacks and two side yard setbacks. One front yard setback will be 75 feet,the other front setback may be reduced to 37.5 feet. Side yards shall be a minimum of 75 feet. • As previously requested, provide an analysis of all GGAMP Neighborhood/Transitional Conditional Use sites proximate to the proposed site- all sites east of Collier Blvd., i.e. provide acreage calculations for each site; expansion opportunities; and, narrative regarding the suitability of each these data.) Response — This has been addressed in Exhibit 4. "Opportunities within Golden Gate Estates to meet the Church's locational needs for their new chapel are extremely constrained. Map 4-C the Golden Gate Master Plan overlay within the Church's Golden Gate Estates boundary shows there are only twenty parcels within the Neighborhood Centers that allow for conditional uses. These parcels are either built upon or were not listed for sale. Other properties that may qualify for Transitional Conditional Uses were also built upon or not listed for sale. These constraints caused the search for a suitable location to extend beyond these twenty parcels within Golden Gate Estates. The need to remain in Golden Gate Estates and proximate to members was a primary criteria in the Church's search for a suitable parcel in Golden Gate Estates. A suitable site was found at the intersection of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard. This site near to their members and at the signalized intersection of two arterial roads is an appropriate and logical location for the chapel. In order to accomplish the Church's plan, an amendment to the Golden Gate Estates Area Master Plan and a Conditional Use must be approved." • As previously requested, provide an assessment of all commercial nodes/Subdistricts in the Estates designation(east of Collier Blvd.); and, an analysis of lands within the Orange Tree PUD/Orange Blossom Ranch PUD to determine the availability and/or suitability of sites for the proposed land use. (A table may be appropriate for representing these data.) [Based on the data provided in the re-submittal, dated July 15, 2103, it appears that the Orange Tree Settlement Area is centrally located to the membership and accessible by major roadways.] Response — This is addressed in Exhibit 4, "the Church's search for suitable property for a permanent location was based on several criteria including, first and foremost the need to remain in Golden Gate Estates in close proximity to the current meeting house.For this reason, properties outside the limits of Golden Gate Estates do not meet the needed central location to serve all the members within the Church's Golden Gate Estate boundary. Other factors considered include accessibility,ingress and egress,neighborhood compatibility,property availability and cost." Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Principle Planner Comprehensive Planning Page 5 December 6,2013 • As previously requested, provide an assessment of all agricultural lands(The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District along the Immokalee Road corridor) proximate to the Estates designation and subject congregation to determine the availability and/or suitability of sites for the proposed land use (provide parcel listing and acreages). (A table may be appropriate for representing these data.) [Based on the data provided in the re-submittal,dated July 15,2103, it appears that agricultural lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District along the Immokalee Road corridor are centrally located to the membership and accessible by major roadways.] Response — This is addressed in Exhibit 4 the Church's search for suitable property for a permanent location was based on several criteria including, first and foremost the need to remain in Golden Gate Estates in close proximity to the current meeting house.For this reason, properties outside the limits of Golden Gate Estates do not meet the needed central location to serve all the members within the Church's Golden Gate Estate boundary. Other factors considered include accessibility,ingress and egress, neighborhood compatibility,property availability and cost. Maps 4A-4C/ Exhibit 4 text (page E4-1) refers to "three distinct boundary areas"; however, Exhibit 4 maps 4.B and 4.C. appear to have a combined Immokalee and Golden Gate Branch;provide clarification Response— The Immokalee and Golden Gate branch has an overlap for language considerations. The Immokalee branch provides primary Spanish speaking service, and all Spanish speaking members in Golden Gate are provided for in this location. Likewise, those English speaking members within Immokalee may attend English services in Golden Gate. Membership Location Map • Identify major roadways within the"Golden Gate Estates Branch"boundary,e.g. Immokalee Rd., Everglades Blvd., Oil Well Rd.,Randall Blvd., etc. Response—the map communicates it's purpose and no further revisions were made. Golden Gate Estates Branch-Members Location Map • As previously requested,provide the capacity of each church; provide Immokalee church location and state if this church is at capacity, over capacity or has available capacity; and, provide optimum distances traveled by members of each church to meet worship/religious objectives (data may be best addressed in the Exhibit 4 text) Response The subject of this petition is to provide a permanent location for the temporary church that is at capacity. • Delineate the Immokalee Branch boundary Response — The Membership Location map shows the delineation of the Immokalee Branch boundary with the cross hatch that is included in the map legend. Golden Gate Estates Branch-Golden Gate Area Master Plan Map • Revise map to accurately reflect the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundary; spell-out text in legend and table; correct parcel and acreage count for the Randall Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict; and delineate the Immokalee Branch boundary. Response: The map has been revised to show the entirety of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan boundary and noted the source as,Collier County website.The source of the parcel information has been noted as, Collier County Property Appraiser. The boundary of Golden Gate Master Plan extends beyond the subject boundary of the LDS Church Golden Gate membership boundary, however we have revised the map to show both as requested. The text in the legend has been Ms.Michele Mosca,AICP Principle Planner Comprehensive Planning Page 6 December 6,2013 revised.The Immokalee branch boundary has not been added as it does not extend in to the Golden Gate Master Plan boundary. Provide a Notarized Letter of Authorization for J.R. Evans Engineering(required for all Agents listed in Section I.B.of the GMPA application. Response—All submittals will be submitted under the agent as listed on the application, R. Bruce Anderson,Esq. of Roetzel&Andress,L.P.A Exhibit 7 Public Facilities Note: If the proposed project includes cooking facilities and/or classrooms/ offices/etc. with sanitary facilities,then the public facilities impacts for water and wastewater should be calculated at 5gpd/seat,not 3gpd/seat as provided. If the referenced uses are not proposed to be included within the project, please note the exclusion(s)within the water and wastewater analysis. Response: The Utility Provisions Statement has been updated. Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist, Surface Water and Environmental Planning: In accordance with Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 6.1.1 and Section 3.05.07 of the Land Development Code (LDC), 15 percent of the native vegetation is required to be retained on-site, if developed as a church: Single-family homes as currently allowed on the property are exempt from this requirement. Floodplain compensation areas may be planted with native vegetation in accordance with the criteria in the LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.e to help meet the native vegetation retention requirement. Response-Acknowledged. The subject property is located partially within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone ST/WS-4 (3.06.00 LDC). Typical church uses would not be expected to be regulated by this Overlay. Response-Acknowledged. Surveying for listed species survey took place from November,2011 to January, 2013 and approximately 15 hours were devoted to wildlife survey. No listed species or evidence of listed species were observed on the project site. Given the location and altered hydrology of the site, the property would likely offer,at best, limited potential utilization for foraging birds and transient species. Response-Acknowledged. A letter from the Florida Master Site File regarding previously recorded cultural resources lists no previously recorded cultural resources in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East. The project will be subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by CCME Policy 11 .1 .3.The provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the LDC. Response-Acknowledged. The proposed GMP amendment will have no affect on the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME). Response-Acknowledged. John Podczerwinsky,Dev.Review Project Manager,Transportation Planning Section: Ms.Michele Mosca,AICP Principle Planner Comprehensive Planning Page 7 December 6,2013 The proposed master plan included with the submittal is not consistent with Objective 3 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Refer to Policies 3.1 and 3.3. Show all proposed future right-of-way reservations for a six-lane Randal Boulevard (180' Right of Way) and a four-lane Everglades Boulevard(200' Right of Way)to become consistent with the County's 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. Response—Through multiple meetings with County staff Reed Jarvi and Heidi Ashton-Cicko, the ROW needs agreed to are addressed in a separate Developer's Contribution Agreement and the companion Conditional Use petition. Aaron Cromer,Principal Project Manager,Public Utilities Engineering: At this time, Public Utilities has no issues with the application. The request is outside of the existing water and sewer district boundaries. Response-Acknowledged. Pollution Control staff: (Drew Morris, Sabas Figueroa and Richard Orth) Pollution control staff reviewed the proposed LDS Church in Golden Gate Estates because the project site is located within the County Well Field Protection Zone (WFPZ) 4 and is not connected to any municipality for water and sewer services. Because the project is proposing to use an On-site Sewage Disposal System the Ground Water Protection Ordinance requires the development to adhere to all State FDEP and/or DOH requirements for setback distances from public/private water supply wells,wastewater treatment design and effluent disposal for this project to include any industrial wastewater discharges from the water treatment system.However,groundwater monitoring and high level disinfection standards may be a State FDEP /DOH regulatory requirement if this site is required to be permitted as a new domestic wastewater treatment facility with a reverse osmosis (RO) industrial wastewater component from the water treatment system. Response-Acknowledged. Also,be aware of the language in 3.06.12.K(4)of the L.D.C.that addresses storing hazardous products in WFPZ 4. In summary, the ordinance states that no hazardous wastes/products are to be released or discharged into any stormwater systems, on-site sewage disposal system, or any soil or water bodies. It also states that all hazardous wastes must be disposed of in accordance with applicable law and that all hazardous waste discharges exceeding 50 gallons be reported to the county within 48 hours of discovery. Response-Acknowledged. Sincerely, ROETZEL&ANDRESS,LPA R.Bruce Anderson For the Firm RBA/dk 7857886_1 103972.0008 o �- 'oi rvrty Comprehensive Planning Memorandum January 29, 2014 Sent Via E-Mail Mr. Bruce Anderson Roetzel and Andress 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre-Third Floor Naples, FL 34103 RE: 3rd Sufficiency Review of Growth Management Plan Amendment Petition PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1, a Small Scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan to allow a Conditional Use for a church/place of worship at a maximum intensity of 20,000 square feet on +7.80 acres (Tract 115, Unit 69 and the East 150 feet of Tract 116, Unit 69 Golden Gate Estates). Dear Mr. Anderson: Several items requested within the 1st and 2nd Sufficiency Letters-dated November 16, 2012 and August 22, 2013 respectively, addressed in the meeting held between County staff and your consulting team on December 6, 2012, and also contained within the memorandum to J.R. Evans Engineering firm, dated February 22, 2013, have not been addressed within this 3rd submittal. Therefore, it is presumed that these items will not be addressed within the Growth Management Plan amendment submittal. Accordingly, staff can deem this petition sufficient, subject to the resolution of the transportation issues noted below. Below are Transportation Planning staff's review comments that will need to be addressed/supplemented in the final submittal prior to establishing public hearing dates for this petition. (1) The proposed Developer Contribution Agreement appears to be an early draft and does not offer terms acceptable to the County. Accordingly, submit a finalized DCA that has been endorsed by County staff. (2) The Traffic Impact Statement is now outdated. Accordingly, please update the background traffic volumes with the figures contained within the 2013 Annual Update and Inventory Report. Once the petition has been modified to address the above items, please submit three copies, all properly assembled, for a final sufficiency review. Resolution #12-234 provides 30 days (February 27, 2014) for you to respond to this letter with supplemental data. Should you have any questions or want to schedule a meeting to discuss staff comments, please contact me at 239.252.2466 or via email at michelemosca @colliergov.net. Regard e R. My a, AI. i Principal PI.nner cc: CPSS-2012-1 File AGENDA ITEM 9-B Co er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION HEARING DATE: JULY 17,2014 SUBJECT: CU-PL20120002615, THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (COMPANION ITEM TO CPSS-2012-1) APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Corp. of Presiding Bishop LDS Church Agent: R. Bruce Anderson,Esquire 4823 North Royal Atlanta Drive Roetzel & Andress, LPA Tucker, GA 30084-3806 850 Park Shore Drive Trianon Centre-3rd floor Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for Conditional Use No. 1 of the Estates (E) Zoning District, as provided for in Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1. of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC),to allow a church. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 7.8 ± acre property is located on the northwest corner at the intersection of Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard in Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map on the following page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner requests a Conditional Use approval to allow for a Church in the Estates (E) Zoning District. The subject site is located in a Special Treatment Overlay for well fields (ST/W-4), which requires land uses that reduce the potential for groundwater contamination. In addition, there is also a companion small scale amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element of the Growth Management Plan (Petition CPSS-2012-1). CU-PL20120002 615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 1 of 12 July 2,2014 S N\ 7 $ Z V Z $ �, \ _ T A \\ x R q A R 2 a x R \ N 2 R. A « Z A 1 A A A 2 \ O 1 CO &\\W A WOO A « t Ill 2 • \ -1 1 N C \ c OWA3V106 530Y1011 3 \ ---OWA31100 530V10113A3----- .:,:.;f.•..:::;•.:'.::...,:.4-•7 N 0 : .,„,.. :.:. 0 a 0 0 - :?°*kal U it g a g A _ Z 1 N, Z s s \g s s 9 n i N 9 1 0 e 1 a s c a -\ a s w x 6 ? g & w x a 6 a W ?��a`\ s 8 A S z g e 6 S i N r N A R R R R 8 R X R of N -1 a 71105 01 ION U1 * 1 Z -I a 68 'MS g Q \ a° 4 ) E Q ri \ ti 4 Ap a C° CS t:t Q d O o o o F- t;}(:),04 Jy a^ Icl i ! ts6 ...3 A ted rep' ',' ec ._.i Mai 644 __ t 'a ‘1"[.." ADJACENT ZONING: E } ..1 t i .::. :TR --I t 013H 11-a — ii T _ 1 ►waa b II i _ AbVLNYS 0 ,.d 1 I :) . i-' 83du ol 4 I II tp K 1 d f F Z [. - a ��'•- �� N +I �„Z'� , •LV y rv�1 7 "'':' I o .• 5xr y \ J , m YZ V O 7 ''J r ... . .. II L„ W 8 II :N� m• I I.`. z- a t g ' ,j C• .- ti-11-ii 011gOd _ � real a t1 e. 1 I -1 (ii ` :y 17,4r ;"1114 s I .^ -xu+re.o.aau.st 3 — — Y , __ / i i I DAIS rlllorMa t 3 ISNINOZ memo \ Y r--7-i 1 E 11 1 ill t�r.6 ':.\ s 6 W R w . . . . 9 Kg LN 0 co Z p W 55 zz I- 6izF 5, J fire oLL�W 3 9 ^e3W m�Z an 0z�z w I g: 8xBM Na0w og wd O Z°Z war <m �OOU Q b w� p UmW Z� 0 p ° ia� p1 Ka' d Oz 0NS1- U 1 E la Ill •w0 '�a I -.i.-60 w o ZN No z Im WI d2 xJ <Z Q W 0 J Y�aMZ !SK OE 0 3 z v xa Fwa N mva aM aNWif_X g �w� SIN Z J �> O m<D O O 0 •<N E p N r 2 2§ 0 t't/-�Li W wa C'1 Z W to pow W O ce O.w �$pcp0 �n In 0- < c..?.(I) w E �t°8Q N E W:-�� �W WtgUN i > ° >°w Q W° w23 ' g fi§11,_BNvb3.s-, G LLLI 02 w� w >- uCiZ m0<c°.)o ° �R-,N . .� o za fia � g J- a• to. Wz w �° �a < ¢ awls L. 3 � Kg a 2 0 w o > QUO "? a O m gm rn a °O La M�� ° D 2 �N� o 0>ID0Z cw> EE�Lo m�CO 04 ZO "W z-cam.) Cn m ��,9aa»� tic k� w E o z� s< ammzz1 x° 1 � w 3� Z �c� Z g o fl °w>a°$-lwr° N ' u.y_i,> rnwy wm < Q UW I- 2 Z (nw 000Z rx rno N_.._ 'a m� °.loo vim W o0 , o U ° aQ0 m oamQ ��~ }? AS 5,1g'gR wwd w- oa W oo tore 'r d u_ Z <�_I a�wa,=zz �8 c0 • JZW �0 p n F < Lax7 -FZ-O <nw 2TS W z zW > 04 o a N O \ �mgow5O0a ac0i c 1- �t7 w x U M(n W 1 w a Z �VZ >� w \ w 0 Pw� z-'<Z 0w a+ a N -6,7* z U �U] rn; YZZ0Lo < '2 � � c wm1 Z¢ a I a Za 0 m <w� amo`O w E Q�S-- .�' i0 2 0 QU W4 Z� CO D r) ? ��� N 4 �¢J Z a� E E E)-r ' a D a)a s�,l6 X> a U p 00 �oz TzTvWim012_1 d 0Ojv`) 22.6 .2m a v c• d a<cC W id L W mw F JO��N�� ���tYN� J J Nm zN• O J N NN mZaa�n1 w »=3 CI O p O Z W} VV ZZOrU $rR w O W p x W O U��iO g a w o W$ cog O W H I--.2mZ<.�coaJ(1) N yPIZLLWd Z N z- a 0 as Q W I-Z z w no ,Z J Ww n. + i LI Z ) .4 O W g ONO ZH Z(n d o N N h O p 1 l7 EL X w D Z o w tl p K Z O LL )a n ri ci 1° p 0 0 a �§ r �< 00 CC 0 0 7d 0 vgFJ -+-i ° w N o a <.IC C Ja f S O 9 p { ° A z3w ZcZw 1)11) ° 4 6 Z Q 1.7E }6 W W 6 t 5Qa° wzZ ra_-re n0 0 z $ wS 3-a� w x 3 gJW �o 'j o I I i i I mz°a 0 3z� amJ Luc)a N a aj�In <Z .- MO A OUT gg m ° }�}..�� r w ce A -2.awm Wig? too < a aoQO ��°� mw } 7w w �4 € 41 cr o_ p2q rw �tt O_U 1 ° }� � ,.pI-0 I-4J W jn Q >� N M N I I M V'a iJ�O gA CC W h->ZYOr SrZ SN WU O '- O o "ice o wowj 1. 0• Wd-gz as 0 n-W c a¢ w J g a r Z w0r6JF� S-<N ao (/=j ro zam azz� r- c�a CC (?vi0 0OSUZ �a CD Nw a Z=1 5 z° 5 tw w a0 a w ll ;0000 zr, IXWOO lz Fl CI O w 1 1 1 N LO h' < WOW W 0.O a0U a aOW Jr Z er Ct Yi O O hb rr1Q�> �y,� ..ZW >zx Uz Q wU Z{aZ)W m< (1} r V)U O m cc<W lai S �J Q.a 4.1 5 ° NprvI W a-h rL w03 0 Q F Z3 F- Mwww W z� n_do az1 zi, <¢� O 3m3 I- wW aZi� < ° VOQO< (nJwO Z °O J < C9 w h J wW°O O J J r3rZ Z U 0 Y Q Ofy w Z U ZZ W 3r.< <� w Z Z < N 2 3 p Q J��<z X < O Z UO�O0 J J�J? L±L CC 03 r 55 < O z w K Qi O0 Ja JO>ce Q U w w 4 m r m Z w m a V) 1- J z J 0 U TzZ)=z H a6FZ 7 Q>- 00 3 U h J<�>ma av"- D °,03 m 3 1 ar CI-fl. I w v As••L owl/0th xe.-.i-..kw.oam®m....,.a,i-nom.,a.a...a,o..t W The proposed Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints will have a worship hall, administrative offices and auxiliary uses that will be housed in a 20,000 square foot structure. The chapel will seat 230 people. According to a Narrative Statement provided by the petitioner, Sunday church services and Sunday School will occur at 9:00 a.m. Church meetings for youth and the congregation will occur one or two evenings per week. Special events including but not limited to baptisms, dinners and holy days will occur once or twice monthly. The only non- church group that will use the church facility is the Boy Scouts. The Church does not rent its facilities to outside groups. There is no administrative staff or regular office hours as volunteers typically serve in that capacity. The Conceptual Master Plan depicts a 20,000-square foot church building with 230 seats and 131 parking spaces. There are two points of ingress/egress, one from Randall Boulevard and one from Everglades Boulevard. Sidewalks have been provided along Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard as well. All of the proposed development except for the sidewalks along the rights-of—way and ingress/egress driveways into the site are outside of an existing 50-foot road right-of-way easement. The proposed companion Growth Management Plan text amendment (GMPA) requires a recreated 65-foot wide buffer along the north and west property lines adjacent to the existing, neighboring residences. In addition to the 65-foot wide buffer is a 10-foot wide Type B landscape buffer. The GMPA also requires a 20-foot wide landscape buffer along the south and east road right-of-way boundaries, it has not been provided. The agent has proposed a 15-foot wide Type D landscape buffer instead. Unrelated to the GMPA is a .77 acre preserve area in the southwest portion of the site that provides additional buffering. Water and sewer service will be provided by a private well and septic system. As previously stated, there are existing single-family dwellings that are located on the north and west sides of the site. The maximum zoned height is 30 feet;the actual height is 60 feet according to language provided in the GMPA. SURROUNDING LAND USE &ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: The site is currently undeveloped,with a zoning designation of(E) Estates SURROUNDING: North: Single-family residence, with a zoning designation of(E)Estates East: Everglades Boulevard, a 2 lane roadway within a 100-foot right-of- way, then a single-family residence and undeveloped land with a zoning designation of(E)Estates South: Randall Boulevard, a 2 lane roadway within a 100-foot right-of- way, then a single-family residence and undeveloped land with a zoning designation of(E)Estates West: Single-family residence,with a zoning designation of(E)Estates CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 5 of 12 July 2,2014 .x ! -. h I o�' SUBJECT PROPERTY I. '" r . 1. •x 404 ; < s T. w '. 4,, ■ ,;,,.:N�8 1.; . . .,, , ..1, ,yam 1 i:, ,, ,,,.„. t . , . ,,,I . .. , , , ,,, „„,,..*k.z,**'''',.; - ,,,; ‘ '''' -, ♦ w M '. nvD , �.--..-, .+•+ - ■ # Aerial GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN(GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is located within Golden Gate Estates and designated Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). The GGAMP limits Conditional Uses, such as a church, to certain locations within the Estates area. The subject site is not eligible for a Conditional Use, as it does not meet the locational criteria within the GGAMP. Because the property does not comply with the locational criteria contained in the GGAMP, the property owner submitted a Growth Management Plan amendment (GMPA) application (Petition PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1) that, if approved, will allow a church building of up to 20,000 square feet on the site. Staff has reviewed certain Goals and Policies of the GGAMP. Below is the GGAMP text (in italics)followed by staff analysis (in bold). GGAMP Goal 5: Future growth and development within Golden Gate Estates will balance the desire by residents for urban amenities with the preservation of the area's rural character, as defined by wooded lots, the keeping of livestock the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, low- density residential development, and limitations on commercial and conditional uses. CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 6 of 12 July 2,2014 Project consistency with this Goal is contingent upon BCC approval of the companion GMP amendment,Petition CPSS-2012-1. GGAMP Policy 5.1.1: Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting within Golden Gate Estates shall be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce light pollution. In implementing this Policy, the County shall apply the following standards: a. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. 1. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom"style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. 2. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. The proposed project must adhere to the lighting requirements contained within Policy 5.1.1 of the GGAMP. The CU application may not be deemed consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan unless or until the companion Growth Management Plan amendment, Petition PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1, is approved by the Board of County Commissioners and subsequently becoming in effect. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject application is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 4.68 acres of native vegetation, which includes the exclusion of the existing and future right of way. A minimum of 0.70(15%)acres of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 7 of 12 July 2,2014 Based upon the above analysis and mitigation, Transportation staff concludes that the proposed conditional use may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. ANALYSIS: Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property of uses in the same district of neighborhood; and 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters,where applicable: 1. Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1., of the LDC permits conditional uses in the Estates (E) zoning district. The requested use for a Church is permitted as conditional uses in the Estates (E) zoning district, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, Conditional Use Procedures, of the LDC. 2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan(GMP). If the Staff recommended Conditions of Approval are adopted, his request will be consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP), This project will be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code(LDC). 3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan on page three,the vehicular ingress and egress to the site will be provided through an entrance off of Randall Boulevard and an entrance off of Everglades Boulevard. The minimum parking requirements for a Church are as stated in LDC Section 4.05.04, Table 17, Parking Space Requirements, are 3 parking spaces for every 7 seats. Since the Church provides 230 seats, a minimum of 99 parking spaces are required. The applicant has provided 131 parking spaces, which is 30 percent above the minimum required. In addition,the petitioner is providing a sidewalk along the Randall Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard rights-of-way. The Fire Code official's office has no objection to the ingress/egress, and will review the Site Development Plan (SDP) upon its submission to ensure compliance with applicable fire codes. 4. The affect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise,glare,economic or odor effects. CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 8 of 12 July 2,2014 If the Staff recommended Conditions of Approval are adopted, the proposed Church should have minimal impact on neighboring properties in relation to glare, economic or noise effects. Activities at the subject property are generally concentrated inside the church building. The Growth Management Plan requires that the applicant provide a 65-foot wide buffer along the north and west property lines. To further mitigate for any noise or glare impacts from the parking lot and church building to the existing and future neighbors, the applicant will provide required landscape buffers outside of the 65-foot area. A 10-foot wide Type B landscape buffer will be provided along north property boundary and along a portion of the west property boundary. The balance of the west boundary will be buffered by a 100 to 200-foot wide .77 acre preserve area. As previously stated, if the Staff recommended Conditions of Approval are adopted, a 20- foot wide landscape buffer will be provided along the east and south property boundaries adjacent to road right-of ways. 5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. As previously noted, if the Staff recommended Conditions of Approval are adopted the proposed Church will be well buffered. Impacts on surrounding neighbors would be minimized and compatibility with the surrounding properties insured. Based on the above findings,this conditional use is recommended for approval. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): Synopsis provided by the agent,Bruce Anderson, and minor editing by Nancy Gundlach: The meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on March 31, 2014, at 5:30 p.m. at the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District, 13250 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34120. The meeting was attended by the applicant, the consultant team, and one resident who lives adjacent to the subject property. Bruce Anderson, agent for the applicant, gave an overview of the Church or Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints application requests. One question was posed by the adjacent property owner, "How quick can you get this under construction,because we need more services like churches in the Estates?" The agent responded that construction will begin as soon as all permits are obtained,it is anticipated by the end of the year. The meeting concluded at 5:50 p.m. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for CU-PL201 1 00026 1 5 revised on June 25,2014. CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 9 of 12 July 2,2014 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition CU- PL20110002615 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The uses shall be limited as follows: a. The only non-church group that will use the church facility shall be the Boy Scouts. b. The Church shall not rent its facilities to outside groups. c. No outdoor amplified music,except for events which have a special event permit. d. Day Care uses are prohibited. 2. No site related improvements, other than driveways for ingress/egress and sidewalks shall be located within the existing 50-foot wide roadway easement. 3. A minimum of 15%of the parking spaces provided shall be grassed parking. 4. There shall be no activities before 5:30 a.m. or after 11:00 p.m. except for events that have a special event permit. 5. The Church is limited to 20,000 square feet,including no more than 230 seats. 6. A 20-foot wide Landscape Buffer shall be provided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50% of the 20-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 20-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained, where possible, to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. 7. Street lighting and area lighting shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. a. Street lamps shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance,walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 10 of 12 July 2,2014 c. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. ygI 1 F CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 11 of 12 July 2,2014 PREPARED BY: .11..1 .[ 11L/. . .. A 20+ NANCY GU ii 1�L• , AICP,PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE GROWTH '�A ' A' MENT DIVISION REVIEWED BY: RAYMD V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION APPROVED BY: l 1 NICK CASALANGUIDA-ADMINIS'I/RATOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Attachments: A. Resolution B. Letter of Objection C. Letter of Approval CU-PL20120002615,The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Page 12 of 12 July 17,2014 ' f RESOLUTION NO. 14- i A RESOLUTION OF TILE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A CHURCH WITHIN AN ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B;1.c.1 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER AT THE INTERSECTION OF EVERGLADES BOULEVARD AND RANDALL BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 19, 20, 29 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [CU-PL201100026151 WHEREAS,in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, the Florida Legislature has conferred on Collier County the power to establish; coordinate, and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County, pursuant thereto, has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses;and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a.Conditional Use for a church within the Estates Zoning District pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission has made findings that the granting of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and the specific requirements governing the Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 1 0.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code;and €€ WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that: Petition Number CU-PL20110002615,filed by R. Bruce Anderson of Roetzel &Andress, LPA, representing Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Latter-Day Saints, a Utah corporation, with respect to the property hereinafter described in.Exhibit "A", be and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 1 of 2 CU-PL201 10002615—Rev.6/25/14 i Attachment A same is hereby approved for a Conditional Use for a Church within an Estates Zoning.District pursuant to Subsection 2.03.O1.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code, in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit`B"and subject to the Conditions of Approval found in Exhibit "C". Exhibits "A", "B" and "C" are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and super-majority vote, this day of ,2014. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E.BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA By: Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: cs Heidi Ashton-Cicko iyti Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A-Legal.Description Exhibit B -Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit C—Conditions of Approval CP\12-CPS-011.89\35 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 2 of 2 CU-PL20110002615-Rev.6/25/14 I I EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL OF TRACT 115, UNIT 69, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 65 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND EAST 150 OF TRACT NO. 116 OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 69, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 65 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA �__Wes, -- ! • • • i• t 11411 8:Iht S- It i. } ADJACENT ZONING:E yE f �;.G NIC_ � b • i '::A r 1*-..--, • - / r $� if. C`131i ..-IJ i3 _ - A>�° y r t.✓<bYllNYS�In ._._..— — -- -- — . ...... ....1 � 1 I /0".....7-1••:1:-- r- '-_ —alone.ey Au. ot�--� — .1. I J I ;A 1p S i �•y.. .{..'+"r n-s�.< - at `t .4 .y„i-,r„4^M e- rx 91.7. '. ^ jS .vg ` :r fi y.{ -r' T.,f. ,�•A . ,*"w M "-.t .?c r'£4�$,5 -fi x,. ;;. _ �r • 8 �, % �s IIIIII I. I , Et v c3 I 1 • 1 �� t�r: '"'*,,,i,-.. 1 .•. ^Tr x -- i OFD ..1 i �' w Ii 1 q' t 4 ° rc • I b _ I` 1 1 4 y ( w� pr z a 1( ti3y1 I � sa "' ti. ' II. I Z� � i . I.�) � xi .: i 1 1 1 ,,'$� , T 7,,,R1.5.:,' /�:{+ , / , 'I ' �- ` fig r 3 ter` I „ 3.is .Q. N,, 1 �r tt r� , : i (ii I o- mr` I. a -- .--■. ■ --"= --' ....' ../. ' • --i r 1 I j • — ____---, _—GAlB ITMOkYd IE 3:O*MOZ 1k3OYTQY \ // _L--t..--. . 0 11 lit w; Z wI t_.!_i Ili gi i 1 .J K.1..dlWSKOf•NM.,q W%fl wM tM:Y,tYWKA�c 4aati n'a • w a1 $ 13 z o ups k I w a S: z i; i- i- .t• _ y 1c 3.0 7 V1Wy as 0ZFZ w •-- Vaa 4m. �OOO p 5�- !a�0 et (� U('w 2� p0;D. a 1 o. !�l7D3I aY 0.0 4 U> V0, F U IW,I 3 a0 gQ az 0 ww wQx Z 4 �1IE 8r 72 p w 0z U x�ry;0 I - 1 4�z z E m N A I �LI ^ v> , W)Q O 0 1n ° 8 O 4 W,i•0 2 W.w ?°° w s II B 0 aW w UN� O E. u ,,�r.W3 mU I I- W w V a 2 Q V I �Q 01-: Q c-, N u,z P. °O :3<Hw p r ft Li".. W c W >- E., v 0 V RA g B C W s Z �.w0.Q 2 Q _ IX 0 L ¢ W a z.a w y� a. u7 G1 �V ^ m ,ai .T,.1 W L.i{w2 w <Z NC M. �< d 5 ~�V) • 00 4,,.....00z .0 M .E w O 0 E_6 CO m �zd L..0. jJ 100 I Y 5W .E -�n o F' W W Z' �[ ■ri. 3 LaJ W y I""H L 1 :W ' I$Q'o j n- $ al 5 W (n�. > r ,n o 1U3 n 5Ic ��O s mz 6$ LI i�•z cc q ¢ 5 v .„<v 'n dz°�ja<Zr{I=uzz ,=° 1v 2-Sggl. m `W' ', W oz. M0 a < m z U z dO O r �. .[ d W7g ~ P j J., s w U. .... ..__..._.__..... voiozzs(6(rL (L,a3 Ly a Q W W a-ffi ' 'Owd Q I G U Q V7 0 \. Ia11�+m W W-0a(p ai- 0� �w 3 Q 0 n z W� 02.s -00,.,,f e ' jilt W. ,- v r a a.IQ N.•-∎5 L,1� 2°Z:° 'o$ g'g..� m 4 ¢ U ut. W - x m V o t. °s z� m z v) arX�wwin7 a i g g .% i dd - g, a<Jw N� ¢ U O U 03ao� z4Og a0� I_ s 'o '��GGry (6C14 a } W re Cr yj W FQ„ :.c. .._. <a.1«21 0,4 ,,./ Y 2,X Z0.of 1'.5 ';J `O� 6.E G' 0..Q0 j K w (^ m Y Li Si .4'8 ,m ?e a ) V� a r :60411g 5 a c /yy N: L.. w U Ln L... Z 1 W 4,._,I+• p 0 n LY tip w W W « x} O U O O 5 a W .o y. • !L C 1), ,l r2CDZ4_-iD0 0.0V1 N Y N (_ � Z <Y S 4 et +T� �' F.' 2 {�i1 w C�a W i � LL Z~() a j >; .0'. LA,: y tr pu. W z a z Lil C.5 O z et, W -U.W Z W O _ O t u Z{ r 0.1=.J (!S s N a a. a W N ',� �; z� z oriJa V i — _' S 5 B 1i ill K W Ow� 4 �4J 0 �. 5�3� ozcw) om wa } ASa a W w z W��}..R 0,--,..012 m L7) U)U) '4Lx �: u,-o20 (.9f0_.w1- 0.T �- Dl(�J 0 ,CYin ',1r':I k. W ai amz O 5 o a', •r o,.IR 6 ES•c8 all ! ¢sowq`:?- a(wilwo G1 in Q N l v: 1 : ,.I,-, v '? ,. vis 4:11-1-,4'''' jj Hlaw2 Zw,g 2P. M WCt O 'O. ,l] ,NF.� U00 ~ wa zgza" o wa 4 W 3a Z '166-W.--7 >aFV 6Y - I Yd mw Z a 2 zvw r voo w i 1 1. - x 5 a-,0Vim .610,--: a. to (.IW 1 I I U zs O zO- Sp o.co rn JC7. } ( w Lij a0 o a.�ow (d� Z mQ ,^?Icici '-;°j rrz ?; f" w 3.1 W.& Z Q1 6 z W CJ �. W . ' '(via maax I- as w'0. z I d _, W �a W� W �.3' I � -----' a�0cix- lz_ D <-c6 V w 0 §m&'"% 1- w 0 '_._...�....,,...___._: w,�,.¢3 mod, I�. ow�U Z 0 ww . I a .. as H Z ; Cl- w ¢a0,¢ to -3`'° Z - ,., 4 i Q I W E.1 ^J Vl ZZ a UUV Ja, W 3.-<K M aOJ ' T TIaG 8 (a Q m,_O.,O 2 �1�y 1 Z 09,, O P zWv Li! sw N o ; r.0 4 I VI 7dzo O 2 C t-1.- 2 J= W.m - .y "1 W L,1: T ('�. }- 1 UW4W�' ?i-m' N.} il) "- nia �: ^ JO n og m 3'� i io Ti;„ I 0_1-711.0_ I 1 a x v Y • I I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CU-PL20110002615 1. The uses shall be limited as follows: a. The only non-church group that will use the church facility shall be the Boy Scouts. b. The Church shall not rent its facilities to other churches. c. No outdoor amplified music,except for events which have a special event permit. d. Day Care uses are prohibited. 2. No site-related improvements, other than driveways, for ingress/egress and sidewalks shall be located within the existing 50-foot wide roadway easements. 3. A minimum of 15%of the total parking spaces provided shall be grassed parking. 4. There shall be no activities before 5:30 a.m. or after 11:00 p.m. except for events that have a special event permit. 5. The Church is limited to 20,000 square feet,including no more than 230 seats. 6. A 20-foot wide Type Landscape Buffer shall be provided along Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. This buffer shall contain two staggered rows of trees that shall be spaced no more than 30 feet on center,and a double row hedge at least 24 inches in height at the time of planting and attaining a minimum of three feet height within one year. A minimum of 50%of the 20-foot wide buffer area shall be comprised of a meandering bed of shrubs and ground covers other than grass. Existing native trees must be retained within this 20-foot wide buffer area to aid in achieving this buffer requirement; other existing native vegetation shall be retained,where possible,to aid in achieving this buffer requirement. 7. Street lighting and area lighting shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. a. Street lamps shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance,walkway,or other area intended to be illuminated. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints EXHIBIT C CU-PL20I 10002615—Rev.6/25/14 Page 1 of 2 c. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the amount of light that extends outside of the intended area. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints EXHIBIT C CV-PL201 10002615—Rev.6/25/14 Page 2 of 2 From: Chau Tran 909 S.Westhill Ct. Bloomington, IN 47403 To Whom It May Concerned I oppose this project because a church in the resident area will cause traffic problems. Very respectfully yours, Ns� -Enclosure: Your copy Attachment B Cobb + ount Growth Management Division-- Planning & Regulation Planning & Zoning Department June 25,2014 Dear Property Owner, This is to advise you that because you may have Interest in the proceedings or you own property located within 500 feet of the following described property and that a public healing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission of Colter County,Florida,at 9/40 A.M.,Thursday, July 17, 2014 in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples.FL.,to consider: CU_PL20110002615, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. a Resolution of the Board of Zoning.Appeals of Collier County, Florida, providing for the establishment of a Conditional Use to allow a church within an Estates zoning district pursuant to Section 2,03.01,6.14.1 of the Collier County"Land Development Code for property located on the northwest corner at the intersection of Everglades Boulevard and Randall Boulevard in Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30, Township 48 South, Range 28 East,`Collier County;Florida (CU=Ft-2011000261 5, The C hurch of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Companion to PL20110002626/CPSS-2012-1 Small Stale GMPA). You are invited to appear and be heard at the public hearing.You may also submit your comments in writing NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL LIMITED TO,'S:MINUTES ION.ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED'AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN...PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A. MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO'THE RESPECTIVE.PUBLIC HEARING,IN ANY CASE wRIrrEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC.SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY STAFF MEMBER NOTED BELOW, A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE. PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO Ti-IS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto,and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.lf you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department,located at 3335 Tamlaml Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing Impaired are available In the Board of County Commissioners Office. This petition application development plans and/or master plan if applicable,and other pertinent information related to this petition is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Division,Planning and Regulation building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104. Please contact the staff member noted below at(239)-252-2484 to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. Sincerely, 1 G(r N\ :,,1 vI. <",i Nancy Gundlach Principal Planner aniy'YV y.. Department of Land Development Services•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,FL 34104.239-252-2400 • • • • • From:Juke Fuentes 2621 Everglades Blvd N Naples, FL 34120 • To Collier County Growth Management Division Nancy Gundlach tam the owner of the property at 2621 Everglades Blvd N, Naples, FL 34120, my name is Julie Fuentes. My property is within 500ft of the proposed location of the new Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day 'Saints. I approve of the use of this land for Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. I would be very happy to have Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints as my neighbor. I also believe it would add to neighborhood value and be a good thing for the community. Feel free to contact me about this matter.I mill be attending the meeting on July 17,but will not speak at the hearing. Please accept this letter at my :vote"YES" for Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. ,e• Sincerely • • Julie Fuentes ‘;- • • 4,e8,, rvo\ck NceolO\,1/40 • Attachment C AGENDA ITEM 9-C EXHIBIT A FOR WILLOW RUN RPUD Regulations for development of the Willow Run RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 590 dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: GENERAI 1 Community recreation, clubhouse, indoor and outdoor hiness facilities (spat, dining facilities, community adrnint tr_ tiun,_rrraintenarrr_e huddrrc f c_reatir nal amenities and other similar uses designed for use by all residents anri uejsk, shall be permitted uses throughout the R designated a►eas of the Nil). Development.Standards: Front Yard Setback: 15' Side Yard Setback_ 5' except where adjacent to toeserve. Rear Yard Seth-rck 15'except where adjacent to preserve_ Waterbody Setback: 0' from lake maintenance easement or bulkhead PItt) Boundary Setback: 100' for any building or use exceeding 35' in height, AO' for any buildin&or use 35' or less In ireinitt When .i building or use is placed less than 100 from PLID boundary a 15' wide landscape buffer with Cr' high wall shall be provided. Setback from Residential Tract: 25' In any case, nu setback is required adiacent to the FPL easement areas as shown on the Master Plan. All non rule ii htin _thall be limited to Hat panel fixtures. Where ',eth r k required, anlighting fixture placed within: (a) SO feet of the external boundary shall be limited to 15 feet in height, (b) 30 feet of the external boundary shall utilize full Cut-off shields. Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 1 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 Maximum Height: Clubtiouse(sl: Zoned: Actual: 75' Other uses. Zoned. 25' Actual 35' 2. Community ,tructules such as guardhouses, iatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative ardritectutal features, streetscape, passive parks and access condo) structures shall have no required setback except as listed below, and are permitted throughout the "R" de igriater areas of the however %cir.l, stitictures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stackinl into the road rightof.wiry_car create site distance issues tot motorists and pedestrians. Maxirnyrn Height for Guardhouses/Gatelrouses: Loned: 25' Actual: 30' Setbacks PUtr itotffl y: 1 0'. except fences or walk shall have no setback,, except that which is adequate to provide lantiy.,1jr on the exterior .itie of the wall ,it equir ed. RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Commercial excavation, asphalt and concrete batch plants (these uses shall cease upon issuance of first �1FJ t=ill11 t11711 l ll.tU_, 111.ItI IIrodel hornet: I). •err trr c+cif e v or^i al 4¢44fw4i4- t4 l4t, 41-1 rt tf-14+; r +d t,34-dea Plc4x1wi>4-4ralt he-ti{ixr-Ii t44- 2. Dwelling Units - Multiple-family, single family attached, single family detached, townhouse, two-family, duplex, variable lot line (single family) and zero lot line (single family). (A variable lot line dwelling unit is a single family dwelling where the side yards may vary between 0 and 10 feet as long as a 10-foot minimum separation between principal structures is maintained.) 3. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 2 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 B. Accessory Uses: ccessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this District, including but not limited to swimming pools, spas and screen enclosures, and ,in iii, ,t,u,t ui t-, all designed to serve the residents and their guests be permuted in ,n!col dal 11 1 .i r_ accessoi ti uses in Exhibit B. F t,i e44al service,; de ilhed-+t+ :4t•+ n- -.ttt:4)4ot 114.e40‘, Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 3 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. PRESERVE A. Principal Uses: 1. Native preserves. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Water management. 2. Mitigation areas. 3. Hiking trails, boardwalks, shelters without walls, or other such facilities constructed for the purposes of passage through or enjoyment of the site's natural attributes,subject to approval by permitting agencies. 4. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 4 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN: This PUD qualifies for the Density Blending Conditions and Limitations for properties straddling the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands in Section B.5.2 of the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element. Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 5 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 EXHIBIT B FOR WILLOW RUN RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARDS SINGLE TOWNHOUSE TWO FAMILY ZERO LOT I MULTI- VARIABLE LOT FAMILY AND DUPLEX LINE FOR FAMILY LINE FOR DETACHED SINGLE SINGLE FAMILY FAMILY Minimum Lot Area 3,000 SF 1,350 SF 2,625 SF 3,000 SF N/A 3,000 SF Minimum Lot Width*3 40 feet 18 feet 35 feet 40 feet N/A 40 feet Minimum Lot Depth 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet N/A 75 feet Min Front Yard 20 feet*1,*2 20 feet*1,*2 20 feet*1,*2 20 feet*1,*2 20 feet*1,*2 20 feet*1,*2 Setback Min 1 Side Yard Setback— 5 feet 0 or 5 feet 0 or 5 feet 0 feet*4 10 feet 0-10 feet*4 Min , Rear Yard Setback Principal*1 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 10 feet Accessory*1 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 10 feet 5 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned 30 feet 45 feet 30 feet 30 feet 75 feet * 30 feet Actual 35 feet 50 feet 35 feet 35 feet 85 feet * 35 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 0/10 feet 10 feet 20'for 10 feet Principal Structures*5 buildings 2 stories or less in height OR X sum of the building height for buildings 3 stories or greater in height Floor Area Min.(S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 750 SF 1000 SF Min PUD Boundary 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 20 feet 15 feet Setback Min : Preserve Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Min Front Yard 20 feet 20 feet _ 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Setback Min Side Yard Setback 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet*5 5 feet*5 0 feet*5 0 feet Min PUD Boundary 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Setback Min Preserve Setback 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet ' 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between 10 feet 0/10 feet 0/10 feet 0/10 feet 0/10 feet 0/10 feet Structures • Maximum Height Zoned 5PS SPS SPS SPS 35 feet SPS Actual SPS SPS SPS SPS 40 feet SPS SPS–Same as Principal Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 6 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 V E Lake Maintenance Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type,and not the minimum lot area,shall define the development standards to be applied by the Growth Management Division during an application for a building permit. *1 Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public road right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road,setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). C. If the parcel has road frontage on two sides,setback is measured from the side with the shortest frontage with the other frontage designated as a side yard. *2—Front entry garages must be a minimum of 20',and a minimum of 23'from a sidewalk. The minimum 20'setback for a residence may be reduced to 15'for a side-loaded or rear entry garage . Porches,entry features and roofed courtyards may be reduced to 15'. *3—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%for cul-de-sac lots and 50%for flag lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *4—Minimum separation between adjacent dwelling units,if detached,shall be 10'. *5—Building distance may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0'where attached garages are provided and a 10'minimum separation is maintained,if detached. — The building height shall be limited to a maximum zoned height of 50 feet and an actual height of 55 feet west of the FP&L Easement. yid Ir[pii zoned tie!girt Note:Nothing in this RPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated In Exhibit E, Deviations. Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 7 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 n.•■■"m/M/:.7170.71:7177=Tti'•ArriS\shmv\J3q*N9b Wl• -1a erro..'ec'm4-fal.S:nlin s,smi,rmrof\\ 6 II i K Z_, .. is g 15 a U 6 [1 W O a QQg *{a ti a uU gfpb N r;', Mob m m W N Z O F s s w P Q ` } E4 O g 0 gt aZU X D W Z%G �W({i w j 4 uuii a O O w d . ter U d I U gi t - 2 N ' t'6 'Ow w a x y� Q l ki 15 1 uS 3 A ' ` aka -1 F Iii 1 o L n r4 q , @ / .gec zip X03 s4 E s F 3 5 6 I Li o L. i �"' s ' ig ! :1 i .1.14 a'.' I • a d P � LI. , { i %2.1 . . . I 1 1 Ii ! @ !•. . . . . . . . ort e P i 0 Ag gl 2t. 1 ' :III : Ij i. i s s I In zo il Al 2 `g I a' ce 1i HI [I a ! III ___. 31 I i P. I . ..b k s# . s it?s III r ----1._.__.w_. Q .0 _____ `, 191Td HIDE FPL EASEMENT 01 If B 1 .4 . 1 ! i ..g. ,I r )2 A WI t.,i a °x o CL ''LL--", COLLIER BOULEVARD z r O Z r„......./.-,:. < o E I d i o a hi CO 4, gt 8E 0 a II ZONED: SAN MARINO RPUD USE: RESIDENTIAL NAPLES NATIONAL-1 -SAN MARINO GOLF CLUB INGRESS/EGRESS I I INGRESS/EGRESS .I t • R I ZONED: SAN MARINO '�h - RPUD ' USE: RESIDENTIAL I U_ F fPOTENTIAL o 4 �� --- z II ; INTERCONNECT R R LAKE 1°6 :CV E li SF-. <1 1 SUFFER PER LDC I - - - - - - V ` J i W•-- ii I R ( 1 flJ R �W _ W I Itn BUFFER PER LDC t■POTENTIAL II R 'W INTERCONNECT _ I Z ZONED: AGRICULTURAL - - ~ - - ' - - - -1 ` USE: UNDEVELOPED m LT ZONED: AGRICULTURAL i g USE: RESTAURANT i R R LAKE f cn m I NAPLES CLUB --I _ , -, - -. - - I -o ESTATES CRAKLIN`JACKS - `- - - - 'R INGRESS/EGRESS INGRESS/EGRESS 1 t .a.:.._ , ...._ I ZONED: HACIENDA - 1 r LAKES DRI/MPUD I - USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: HACIENDA LAKES I ; DRI/MPUD I USE: RESIDENTIAL I i 1 14, i a COUNTY PARK II HACIENDA LAKES PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESS INGRESS/EGRESS N 1 o i f . ti ..•t.... f-7-f'rt--•N : i n a 4 07/2014 PER CCPC HtARING S.U. ■INIIMIIIINIIIIMINONI s 3 05/2014 PER COUNTY REVIEW 3 COMMENTS S;U.• 0 300' 600 ■ 2 12/2013 PER COUNTY REVIEW 2 COMMENTS S,T. .1 _8 1 09/2013 PER COUNTY REVIEW 1 COMMENTS S__T. SCALE: "1"~600' Revision Dote Description By KEY MAP WILLOW RUN RPUD actu ®GradyMinor Q.Grady ul55rew AYWCm1m,r,n. m5 caoa- MOD AO UG 131 agzwoz oawlr sgnuga.PIMA.21191 nArE EXHIBIT C Mkt 2514 Civil gagineers . Land Surveyors Planners . IsnBlscnplsArchitects MASTER PLAN 1 nrE" d Cot.7,401h.5a 0001161 Cm.of AuN.ISOW5161 Briton LC 25000263 Donna Springs:230.547.1141 ,vi.w.Cea'OM 1aar.nnal Volt Myers,220.900.4950 SHEET 2 OF 5 URBAN RURAL FRINGE I RESIDENTIAL I MIXED USE DISTRICT FRINGE I BELLE MEADE NRPA I-- – _ —♦ N ZONED: FOREST GLENN OF j NAPLES RPUD II USE: RESIDENTIAL I ,.r,IFC—-; .e-,a, -300 4 Y J Y w J• w I w SCALE: 1'I=600' .Y 4 J. i w Y w w W I L W Y y. ` W v • ` 4 ` v W W „ W W � I 14 9 w w v w .Y Y •4 'i w W W w W 9 4 w 4. 4 ZONED: A(RFMUO)NRPA w SENDING USE: RESIDENTIAL I.L. I 0 ZONED: SAN 4 W v J v 4 w w v' W w w . i r' I MARINO l v w •Y •• + W '4 W W I RPUD 'w W W Y v 1' W J 4 W USE: W W W Y 4 w ' ;" W W Y * W w w_ ; RESIDENTIAL , W W w + w i w W U) (PRESERVE) W w + W W w ■ 4 W I 3 Y W w W W W w W ' ' W Y w W w w w W W 6 W Y W W v w CO w .1 W w w Y • W W 1 Y 4 4 w 4 w w r w I Y w N . 9 w w •Y 'M 1 w W w Y 'Y W < W W ( . 4 W J W v W v : l Y w Y 4 W w '4 Y w Z , I w w J W 4 W w W w w w 4 w •Y w i• 4 J I • ' •Y •Y i W , W W W W w Y J. w w w J w 9 L w V• W w w ZONED: A(RFMUO) w ' " w • 1 PRESERVE NRPA SENDING I w i ` w 9 W + + ` - 20ACRES USE RESIDENTIAL L Ww ; Q ' I W 4WY w . W • J 2 . . ww w w 3. w Y w w Y � V• W 4 ' - Y I 4 W 4, W '+W w w M w + w w W •L V •.1 I ` y `1 ` JTL R Y w J• 1 w 1y , I - W w rs 1 I \ J w W R \ R w W W w I 1 I r LI J I ) w ZONED: HACIENDA LAKES DRIJMPUD(RFMUO,NRPA - SENDING) _ USE: RESIDENTIAL I•Y 4• W W W W w y W Y I i W W „ R R 4 * WWYw4 + -r �. . . _ �- MATCH LINE – SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 W. {•,. 4 '�— rc 1 R — I - 3 I 1 _ I ���.._., I i–lir • I---.....I %1 n, _..__....— • I i 3 405%2014 PER COUNTY REVIO 3 Cii{,MENTS _.S.l). I _ 13/2013 POY COl1NTY' REVIEW 2--COMMENT" S,U. —-•---- 1 {09/20i3 PER COUNTY REVIEW 1 COMMEld1S _5;0•„ KEY MAF' Revision Dale 1 Dexriplinn --_...__ BY WILLOW RUN RPUD . ■ le GradyMinor Q.GI'OtNNIIIM4409 AIIN,Il701G.P.A. 40tl'COM 11603 YTH Del Ilea Mile/ 3 11.,114 3YY0„q,P1414.1 3413.1 IM@ n EXHIBIT C '—"�0'J ---- Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors • Planner's • Landscape Architects MASTER PLAN 2 fl1L n1YP.. Crn.1444419.ES 0004451 Celt of Amh 1.8 0005151 HII•,.•(.e 4C 90000266 _.. RunIt56pliuyp:230.047.1 Ltd 0'044.Gfndl'A1laor.004l Futilyer5:230.600.4300 0)40110' 3 of 5 1 / --.•"' w w w W W W W w W w W W Ir r ~_ -- R R * W W W W W W W W W w W - MATCH LINE_- SEE_SHEET_3 OF 4_ W:�W:W:W:--, , R W W W w w W w W W W W W I ` W W W W w W W W W W L ... 1 I , w W w Y w W W W w 4 I W W 4. N 1 R 1 \ w W WL W � w w w "-1.- / \ W W w w I _� 1 _ 1 , v w W W w W 1 \•� w w W l R i irsi I , LAKE LAKE ` www w 30 ' / W w W SCALE: 1"=600' W w W ----. 1 I 1 w W W w W ' --_+ W W W It: I w 1 W W W w W W WW W W I R w w W wW w iiiiii W W W W w W w W W Q7I , w w • W PRESERVE W W 210+/-ACRES w w W W• W *I W W w w w w w LAKE 1 W w W W W W wWww W ; WI r� �� l W + 11 W d' W w w w 4 w W =I I W W W w W w w W W w w , ZONED: HACIENDA (UI; w + w w W W W W W W W / W w W W W * w W W W w LAKES DRl/MPUD W 1 W w 1 W w w w w w W W w (RFMUO,NRPA SENDING) col W * w , W W W W W W 4 W 1 USE: RESIDENTIAL I I J w W •1 w w w W w W * W w WI W v ZI 1 w w � I I = ^�� — ti. � v7Y —I r 01 1 g. H' Mi ZONED: HACIENDA ZONED: HACIENDA LAKES ° ( LAKES DRI/MPUD / DRUMPUD i USE: RESIDENTIAL � USE: RESIDENTIAL 1 .7-..r I 120'WIDE FUTURE BENFIELD ■ i ROAD CORRIDOR THROUGH . I / HACIENDA LAKES DRI 1 1 1 g / 1 I I i I I URBAN I RURAL FRINGE I fc 1 RESIDENTIAL I MIXED USE DISTRICT FRINGE 1 BELLE MEADE NRPA ' ' I A- -- - I ----01► `—f 9�i r J�1 V 4 ;07/2014 PLR ld'I'c HEARING S.U. 3 05/2014 PER COUNTY REVIEW 3 COMMENTS S.U. I ' 2 112/2013 PER COUNTY REVIEW 2 COMMENTS S.U. I ' 1 ,9/2013 PER COUNTY REVIEW 1 COMMENTS S.U. KEY MAP 3 Revision I Date Description By SCALP WILLOW RUN RPUD iriruta ira GradyMinor U.1*45 Mmp amleaaoUaira 1.3 toocone Siinu Via Bd krs ars:wox Bonk+.S➢rnlm.14104141+.91131 Mr@ ` EXHIBIT C " '°" Cl itLHnglueets • LendSUrvcsors . Plemucrs . LlindscnpeArchitects MASTER PLAN 3 ft do car.otaw:.Beuurnes• r'er4 uL1.19Wab1bi BlelunuLC2bUUl#MI .1 Hanna Sprngs:239.0.47.1144 wt-Y.00441,,014 nr.0nm Fort Mpste 239.69U.43W 3110111' 4 OE 5 3 SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA: 559±AC PRESERVES: REQUIRED 149.19±AC URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE 114.83±AC NATIVE VEGETATION X 25%=28.71±AC RFMU SENDING 133.87±AC NATIVE VEGETATION X 90%= 120.48±AC PROVIDED 210±AC URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE = 76.13±AC RFMU SENDING = 133.87±AC NOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. e 2. ALL ACREAGES, EXCEPT PRESERVE AREAS, ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. a DEVIATIONS 8 SEE EXHIBIT E, LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS 4 07/2014 PER CCPC HEARING S.U. 3 05/2014 PER COUNTY REVIEW 3 COMMENTS S.U. 2 12/2013 PER COUNTY REVIEW 2 COMMENTS S.U. 1 09/2013 PER COUNTY RENEW I COMMENTS S.U. Revision Date Description Sy �y :1 WILLOW RUN RPUD 9C"ralNtll GradyMinor 0 CrBJyWI' 4•xuctalrx,P. oe CODE A moo VIP Dal Rcv .wwot 9oelu1 SpMIWM 9luddo 31134 bee EXHIBIT C x„ Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners Landscape Architects MASTER PLAN 3 rILB luue. c,I.NME.CO UW6161 Colt.Width.LB UW8(31 Bulmw LC2w55N sssy BnaII1.Spring.231).947.1144 rvxw.GradvMle1)r.cam Flux M)an.231).680.4380 SHOEt 5 OP 5 EXHIBIT D FOR WILLOW RUN RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13, AND 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°45'13" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12, A DISTANCE OF 1,356.42 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, NORTH 87°47'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,318.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12; THENCE RUN ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, SOUTH 00°40'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,353.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°42'14" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,707.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE IN AND THROUGH SAID SECTION 13, SOUTH 00°3911 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,345.38 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13;THENCE LEAVING SAID CORNER, SOUTH 87°30'27"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 1,328.58 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 14,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE IN AND THROUGH SAID SECTION 14, SOUTH 87°28'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,336.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°47'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 671.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°27'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 668.30 FEET;THENCE NORTH 00°47'46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 671.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 87°25.49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,004.66 FEET, (PASSING OVER THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11 AT A DISTANCE OF 668.22 FEET)TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 11, NORTH 00°50'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,371.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°38'49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,235.72 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD 951); THENCE RUN ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE, NORTH 00°50'49" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 344.10 FEET;THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 87°42'04" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,235.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°50'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,028.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°51'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,670.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°46'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,723.04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 11, NORTH 88°17'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,333.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 559.05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Willow Run RPUO PL20130000682 Page 13 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 EXHIBIT E FOR WILLOW RUN RPUD LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS 1. From LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks which are internal to the development to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow sidewalks on one side of the street only for streets with homes on one side of the street. C.- the canopy (21 tree_ canopy tree equivalent)_ hrrrl! be provided per _._ 30 linear feet of sidcw.rlk. La110py tteLS located within 1.0 feet of the >idiewalk nary coi,irrt towards a sidewalk canopy tree. 2. From LDC Section 6.06.01.N, Street System Requirements and Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right-of-Way Design Standards, which establishes a 60 foot wide local road,to allow a minimum 40'wide local road(see Exhibit E-1). 3. From LDC Section 6.06.01.J, Street System Requirements, which limits cul-de-sacs to a maximum length of 1,000 feet, to permit cul-de-sacs to exceed 3,500 feet in length with placement of no through traffic signage and creation Id an ernergrrcy vehicle turnaround apploxuilately 1.5Ut)feet from the beyjniling of the cul-de-sac 4. From LOC Section 4.06.02, Buffer Requirements, which requires a fifteen foot type "B" landscape buffer between single family and multi-family residential uses, to allow no landscape buffer flui cicc,1 r,n,_: „i c l;, i„w 1 , 1,) root wide t re 'B" buffer along the northern PUD boundary adjacent to the San Marine PI ID. 5. From LDC Section 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, Excluding Sound Walls, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' throughout the development, and a 12' tall wall, berm, or combination wall/berm along Collier Blvd frontage. 6. From LDC Section 5.04.04.8.5, Model Homes and Model Sales Centers, which permits a maximum of five(5) model homes, or a number corresponding to ten (10) percent of the total number of platted lots, whichever is less, per platted approved development prior to final plat approval. The requested deviation is to allow for a maximum of four (4) model homes per development tract, not to exceed 20 model homes within the overall RPUD. With each building permit lot a model hrurne, the akplicarit shall provide docuroentation as to the current riurnber of model homes in existence 7. From LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, Temporary Signs, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height.The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. 8. From LDC Section 5.06.02.8.2, Development Standards for Signs within Residential Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 14 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 Districts, which permits one (1) real estate sign per street frontage that is setback a minimum of 10'from any property line,to allow for a maximum of one (1) real estate sign per street frontage setback a minimum of 5'from the property line along CR 951 only. 9. From LDC Section 5.06.02.8.5, Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts, which requires on-premise directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from internal property lines, to allow for on-premise direction signage to be setback a minimum of 5' from internal property lines. This deviation does not apply to property adjacent to Collier Blvd. 10. From LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, Development Standards for Signs within Residential Districts, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development with a maximum height of 8' and total sign area of 64 s.f. per sign. The requested deviation is to allow for two (2) ground signs per project entrance with a maximum height of 10' and total sign area of s.f. per sign face. Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 15 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 ®_ ,4w_m_-___O\_,__%-=_m__-t0__ ma__> » * I ® c ; ■0 �/2�■ :/ i 2/ j / CO / z j / ( ® \ g a§\ 6 % - \r gmo *w3c — \ ® - ° G ~ [ o § o0 r - - | j ) / ( �' ' S | j � � \ & &- / o I � < / a. \ & i\ \ / %/ (\ \ 3\ > \\ ` `, \ / / )\ ;| ,° , ° + - (' kk `| - w (\ ■■ k` q } \ L [ \ ' ' I Z < . e !i ! \ / » s { 22 k | » §» a ±` a ! , e� y. \ • 5, i ~ 2 El ` I _ J `4,'® § ( �' el, k A — 4 / �k . z ?§ , - - - - \A & }« \ § off¥ 09 �• ^\ k \\ / ®r o _® >» '\ GP} >g A CC/ c ° \ ] /k / 5\i ,m EXHIBIT F FOR WILLOW RUN RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. UTILITIES A. Prior to its last phase of development, the owner shalt identify and provide an interconnection stub-out to either Hacienda Lakes or San Marino PUD for water distribution; plans shall be reviewed and approved by CCWSD at time of SDP or plat. This commitment can be terminated by CCWSD if its staff determines that interconnection at either property line is not possible. B. During the Plat approval process, CCWSD shall review and approve the utility design associated with any cut de sac serving in excess of 149 units. 2. TRANSPORTATION A. If warranted by the project's traffic counts the Developer shall be responsible for the proportional share of the cost of a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign, or pavement markings at the Collier Boulevard intersection Upon the completion of the installation, inspection, burn-in period, and final approval/acceptance of said traffic signal it shall be turned over (for ownership) to Collier County, and will then be operated and maintained by the Collier County Transportation Department. 1k.. (4)04-4.1W-Lot+4►ty k: trlopt+rirr-+4-4 1.4rt4f1-ko4ti -rtt: 414,! 44-- 4-.,=1°41+e- (-t44 1-y"4.++41}44 '=1-t-+1 1-+t•hs 44.4 44‘.4 4w+wt; # +f£ct:;?fi4 -3r s+g► =;hi+11-dt-144<a to ;Alt4ti; 1-4{-44-1¢ 0.4si-rv+f+e4ats 4+f fE{+?f}I 4++ -,44+y-++iff+4, 4tgl-d-s iHAY t a +►1-.M ; }4ots,"+4-4+-1-I+ �.1,�:� }t+ a�#lief._ t 4_ou d-y #fa+ 1-.l► ...let#++ -1e-n-s}1----0++ 4-011-X31 way, , } ywt� 4f ttt++4}u,}+ IdJr:r {++rtr,+4t f �., i 1414I41 —.iir+ '4I....t!f O1— i' �,tlrff.-t+o-+F. t:s-4 +fib}=• 11- 1 4-14 -t-4.3ct=ek4afe£ 1-.1-1++. 1-4444-4,--444 44-e-14-44414144 .14r 144114- ,441-44-G-44i#tff)4.-tfi 1-}x14 - -1-'c--�ti 4(41- t 4, -1-4+"4.1.-4:t, 111+44-- ,fS54g4+F. :+Itt41 1-4.e+4-44{4,44144-40 e+ e,,-t c:.sh e tthl+f?r1_+4F}#1.1.4- i .._ ,{, i .k ,.,. ,. a: .. 4-4-4114.r. , ,rw+ff4'43ts 4)+f 401A 4 >1,444'4.i 144-44-1-4,---0,4-4-1-44 4i,;; t , the County has identified various future potential raatf aii runent; 4nr what is currently known as Benfield Road, some of width may cro..s over a± ror.ion tit t1--' RPM neiLnit eastern boundaty,. At the time of the RPlUt) adoptions the4uunty k unable 1-t, dete,rrrint the final, alignment of said 1tt rifielti Road. the I)eveloperr, at the tCoun', request, has agreed to work with the County in the future, should the final alignment a,_ Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 17 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 approved by the Board of County commissioners and as,permittediry_the_2_3pplicable reviewing_atto the lands of RPOD, with the following stipulations: 1. If the eventual alignment, as permitted by the reviewing agenries crosses over RPUD lands, such alignment shall he no further than 300 feet from the eastern boundary line of the RPUD and in no event closet than Jo° feet from any residential or lake tract. The alignment shall be consistent with the alignment of Bentield Road in the development south of the POD, but ',hall immediately thereafter comply with the sentence above. 2 Any portion of Rentield Road that ft aver se s the RPM) lands shall be no more than 120 feet in ultimate right of way width,_inclusive of stoi in water, other than as. provided below. 11w County Shall at ill times be reAronsifile for all permitting for Benfield Road, includlog, any uuoditkatini of any project pet nits and easements, including, without limitation mitigation (e.g.. wildlite protection, buffers, and any obligation imposed on the lands of the IIPLID by virtue of the pemrittinitof the Bertheld Road) for the impacts of any such road and replacement niitifati00 that otherwise is in place within the RM.) that mitigates the impact of the_pioject aridjorthe previous nimiog_ppei anon that occurred within the RPLID listol icalbLifte Owner, its successors or assigns shall not be responsible to obtain or modify 311V current future permits Oi conservation easements on behalf of the County r elated to thelilarminp,,plattiog,replattirdication,construction or extension of Bent ield Road. In no event shall Developer be obligated to plat any roadway or depict any reservation on any plat. 4 Provided all necessary permits. easements, modifications and plats or replats have been obtained, Developer shalt convey the lands to the County Anit claim deed within 120 days of the County's written request to owner at its successors and assigns. the owner, or its Successors Jilt] usiiris, stall be paid the fair market value of the land at the time of the conveyance to the County, excluding damages. ft The County shall also acquit e, at fair market values army IWUD lands remaining to the east of the final alignment, aequested by the Owner, its successors or assigns In the alternative, the County shall design the roadway so as to accommodate wildlife andpedestrian oassags under the road to the lands east of the road within the RPUD lands. H he developee,its succi-,s',urs or assigic:„ shall ptpvide to any potential resident a disclosure statement that the County has identifie.d several potential aligorrients for Benfield Road which may impact time RI'LW lands, and that airy such road could be on the eastern ecli.,e of the prolikrty, once the ,tpprqpriate permind, approvals are obtained by the County This disclosure statement must be Willow Run RPUD P120130000682 Page 18 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 presented to the buyer prior to enmu Eng into any sales contract by Developer ur builders which convey directly to potential residents. trihould Collier County ultimately abandon the proposed roadway extension, or the road alignment is determined not to be within the Willow Run RPUD the Comity shalt release the Developer from the Benfield Road obligations of this PUD and the requirement for the disclosure statement shall terminate, without the necessity of an amendment to this RPUD. 9 1 Or any poi tion of Benfield Road that may_be constructed within the Willow trim RPUD a. Collier County may discharge treated slur mwater into the Willow Run RPUD stormwater mapErgement sy_stein for attenuation. Prior to discharge outside the County owned ROW stormwater shall have received full water quality treatment in accordance with SIWIVID requirements at the time of permitting and shall not compromise the proposed water airality and proposed water quality and/or recreational use of the lakes. Collier County shall be responsible for maintenance ot water quality for stormwater resultintfrom the County roadway Willow Run RPUD shall be held harmless if the PUD's stormwater management system experiences a water quality breach due to Benlield Road sturmwater. The County shall be responsible for any remediation and related costs it the Sf-WIVID deems the ROW is a cause of water quality issues. No other stormwater, treated ot untreated I orn off-site portions of the HOW shall disc liarg! into Run RPUD surface water management system, b. Lighting must comply with international Dark Skies standards. 10. Upon recordation of the deed or other conveyance instrument- in the public records of Luther County for the conveyance of the right of-way_and associated lands the Developer shall become eigblc for transportation impact tee _credits bas.ed,upon_the_::Areed troll fair market value per acre in d CLOI dance with the consolidated impact fee Ordinal-1i e in effect at the time of recordation of the deed. It the_projet t is built out or has prepaid transpprtation impact fees to be assessed for the project then the develpper or its successors or assigns shall be entitled to a cash reimbursement. C. Potential vehicular interconnections have been shown on the conceptual PUD master plan in locations which may be appropriate for shared access to the intersecting driveway with h V4-)Ordit it+t-f!43- arrf r poreiblrty ferf.fret roilt-to-g, 4,04,4444+44‘.:+14,14•41 rna4rrtenaru4 - ns f d 0+44 Hfi,v --1-tri4 4-1 stra et-4 aEeK5 m,0441 the 4 A he-m-pii-ftry-(Me+te tite-afim-e+gittmiti hired shall not be prohibited to Any_property that is immediately adjatermt to time Collier Boulevard intersecting di iveway and is willing to pay its prorated "fair" share of the entj roadway bridge, Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 19 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 Collier Boulevard i►nprovernetrt , landscaptng, light± f;,_, maintenance taxes and utilities or future signalization, as computed on d porated share-by numbei of units connected to the driveway. `urn shared access shall be pi-anted via executed shared access easement agreement to such h adjacer►t property within 90 days of receipt of payment of said pi orated "fair" share expenses to the Willow Run RPUD developer or successor. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL Vegetation shall be retained in accordance with the criteria established in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP and Section 3.05 of the LDC. Total Preserve Required 149.19±AC Urban Residential Fringe 114.83±AC Native Vegetation X 25%= 28.71±AC RFMU Sending 133.87±AC Native Vegetation X 90%= 120.48±AC Total Preserve Provided 210±AC Urban Residential Fringe = 76.13±AC RFMU Sending = 133.87±AC B. For wildlife. prateclion, roads located within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use Dist►ict will have a ve►ylow speed limit (e.g., 15 ntah)and tortoise caution signs will be installed. Prove bui.ep,.yfia,q1..wrties Ajar ent to the Preserve will beiaovided with written information about the hese!ve's pint ettedwklhte arid management_practices which n Fayr have direct effects on their_property including: Acjpher tottoises may expand their foraging or but habitat to include yards. t_peripdic prescribed burns will result in smoke in the vicinity 4. PLANNING A. A maximum of 590 dwelling units shall be permitted in the PUD. B. No buffer shall be required if the right-of-way reservation as shown on the Master Plan as an east/west road is constructed as an east/west road along the southern PUD boundary as shown on the Master Plan. The developer is not obligated to construct the east/west road along the southern PUD boundary. 5. WATER MANAGEMENT The water management system shall be designed to route existing off-site surface water flows through or around the project. These conveyance facilities shall be sized such that post construction water levels are lower than or equal to existing water levels on the Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 20 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014 surrounding lands. These improvements shall be made prior to the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. 6. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is The Willow Run Land Trust, C/O Joseph D. Bonness, Ili as Trustee, 1910 Seward Avenue, Naples, FL 34109. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval,the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. Willow Run RPUD PL20130000682 Page 21 of 21 Last Revised 7/30/2014