The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Backup Documents 06/26/2014 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS BACKUP DOCUMENTS JUNE 26, 2014 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON JUNE 26,2014, IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION BUILDING,2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE,NAPLES,FLORIDA. INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE,WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL.THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING MINUTES- 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. BD-PL20130002506— Keith and Shannan Jacoby request a 10.4-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit of Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens subdivision, also described as 215 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl,Principal Planner] B. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000504 — 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC is requesting an insubstantial change to the Naples View RPUD, Ordinance No. 2012-22, to remove townhouse dwelling units and two-family, duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses; reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 dwelling units; amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; add new LDC deviations relating to boundary marker signs and project entrance ground or wall signs; change the name of the PUD Managing Entity; and delete development commitments relating to the Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access and facilities. The subject property is located on the east side of Airport Pulling Rd,south of Orange Blossom Dr., in Section 1,Township 49 South, Range 25 East,Collier County, Florida,consisting of 11.32±acres. [Coordinator: Kay Deselem, Principal Planner] 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURN 130-0.20130002506 02506 E/26/14 Teresa L. Cannon 'Jacoby From: Reischl, Fred Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:39 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Patricia L. Morgan; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda;Wells, Laura Subject: Ad Request BDE-PL20130002506 Jacoby Dock Attachments: NDN Ad Req.docx; NDN Ad Req signed.pdf;Ad Map BDPL132506(2x3).pdf Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also please send confirmation for approval prior to processing. Thanks! -Fred Fred Reischl, AICP Senior Planner Planning & Zoning Department Phone: 239-252-4211 Fax: 239-252-2834 Fl Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 May 20, 2014 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 6, 2014,and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Fred Reischl, in the Planning &Zoning Department, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DEPARTMENT: PLANNING &ZONING Zoning Services Section FUND & COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 450046717 Account Number: 076397 lr� Authia .ed Designee signature for HEX Advertising PL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday, June 26th,2014, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples Fl 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20130002506 — Keith and Shannan Jacoby request a 10.4-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit of Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens subdivision, also described as 215 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County,Florida 11 FP 44, N.S.411 O -,111111 ssj S AMIAMI TRAIL w-J F]S Q A W § V1 z T H m Z W - (106'8'0) >.' 7 Q 000 30180 1116060 5 / mi . o m . a o w 11€l :irk _ ifti �V 411r - of YBXIC° MO Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez,Wanda Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:45 PM To: Minutes and Records; Reischl, Fred Cc: Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Subject: re:Ad Request BDE-PL20130002506 Jacoby Dock Attachments: NDN Ad Req.docx; NDN Ad Req signed.pdf; Ad Map BDPL132506(2x3).pdf The title and requested ad run date are correct. OK to proceed. Wanda Rodriguez, ACP Advanced Certified Paratega( Office of the County Attorney (239)252-8400 From: ReischlFred Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:39 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: BellowsRay; BosiMichael; Patricia L. Morgan; NeetVirginia; RodriguezWanda; WellsLaura Subject: Ad Request BDE-PL20130002506 Jacoby Dock Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience.Also please send confirmation for approval prior to processing. Thanks! -Fred Fred Reischl, AICP Senior Planner Planning & Zoning Department Phone: 239-252-4211 Fax: 239-252-2834 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Acct. #076397 May 30, 2014 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34110 Re: BD-PL20130002506 - Display Notice (w/Map) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, June 6, 2014. Please send the Affidavit of Publication in Triplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk P.O. #450046717 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on June 6, 2014,and furnish proof of publication to the attention of The Minutes & Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #401, Naples, FL. 34112. The advertisement must be a 114 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DEPARTMENT: PLANNING &ZONING Zoning Services Section FUND& COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 450046717 Account Number: 076397 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday,June 26th,2014, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples, Fl 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20130002506 — Keith and Shannan Jacoby request a 10.4-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit of Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens subdivision, also described as 215 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida U (u.S.41) rffli�0, S -room, TMIL Lu F 6 J CS 1- Z m w _O /,06,,o) >- 7 ~ 351210 1110N34NVn FE o i IX o �18 U n 1 o L11 II r 1 J i'. i .fa y 'w • GULP OF YBxIC° All Teresa L. Cannon To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Attachments: BD-PL20130002506 (HEX).doc; BD-PL20130002506 (HEX).doc; BD-PL20130002506 (HEX).pdf Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday,June 6,2014.Thanks Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Flora, Susan <susan.flora @naplesnews.com> Sent: Monday,June 02, 2014 1:12 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Attachments: NDN231148058 CC Hex Proof 06.06.14.pdf Please provide approval ASAP for publication on 06.06.14. Thank you, Susan Flora Susan Flora General Sales Support Assistant Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples,FL 34110 0:(239)435-3428 F:(239)325-1251 susan.flora4i naplesnews.com naplesnews.com ndnadvertising.com Putting Your World In Your Hands Call or click today to activate! (239)213-6000 or naplesnews.com/subscribe From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon @collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:40 AM To: Legals NDN Subject: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday,June 6,2014.Thanks Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@col lierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helodesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 26th,2014, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Fl 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20130002506 — Keith and Shannan Jacoby request a 10.4- foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit of Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens subdivision, also described as 215 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. unu LEE COUNTY HICKORY LELY BAY BONITA BEACH ROAD (C R,B65) BAREFOOT E L BAC °0"0H° PROJECT � N LOCATION •5 �5 BWRTA 3 IELY SNORES BAREFOOT BEACH 4A. AVOUBON COUNTRY CLUB LEE CO. O AUDUBON ,NAPOU 1 F COUNTRY " SAM waue kit g BAr ti 9 10 FOREST SoRU5 E LIKES WATEROUDES RETTHREAT PIAZA CIEN EDEN BROOK ON 7HE BAY ARBOR TRACE NLLAOE PUCE ST IA/4 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, Florida 34112- 5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.231148058 June 6.2014 Teresa L. Cannon From: Reischl, Fred Sent: Monday,June 02, 2014 2:21 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Looks good.The final OK will be from Wanda. From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon(acollierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 2:18 PM To: RodriguezWanda; ReischlFred Subject: FW: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Please review and ok to run Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com From: Flora, Susan [mailto:susan.floraCa�naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 1:12 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Please provide approval ASAP for publication on 06.06.14. Thank you, Susan Flora Susan Flora General Sales Support Assistant Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples,FL 34110 0:(239)435-3428 F:(239)325-1251 susan.florana naalesnews.com naplesnews.com ndnadvertising.com Putting Your World In Your Hands Call or click today to activate! (239)213-6000 or naplesnews.com/subscribe From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon(acollierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:40 AM To: Legals NDN Subject: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday,June 6,2014.Thanks 1 Teresa L. Cannon From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Monday,June 02, 2014 2:59 PM To: Reischl, Fred;Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Looks good to me too. Wanda Rodriguez, MCP .Advanced Certified Para(egaC Office of the County .Attorney (239)252-8400 From: ReischlFred Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 2:21 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon; RodriguezWanda Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Looks good.The final OK will be from Wanda. From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannonacollierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 2:18 PM To: RodriguezWanda; ReischlFred Subject: FW: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Please review and ok to run Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com From: Flora, Susan [mailto:susan.flora@anaolesnews.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 1:12 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Please provide approval ASAP for publication on 06.06.14. Thank you, Susan Flora Susan Flora General Sales Support Assistant Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples,FL 34110 0:(239)435-3428 F:(239)325-1251 1 Teresa L. Cannon To: Flora, Susan Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Look good, ok to run.Thanks Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannont collierclerk.com From: Flora, Susan [mailto:susan.flora naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 1:12 PM To: Teresa L. Cannon Subject: RE: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Please provide approval ASAP for publication on 06.06.14. Thank you, Susan Flora Susan Flora General Sales Support Assistant Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples,FL 34110 0:(239)435-3428 ! F:(239)325-1251 susan.flora(a�naplesnews.com naplesnews.com ndnadvertising.com Putting Your World In Your Hands Call or click today to activate! (239)213-6000 or naplesnews.com/subscribe From: Teresa L. Cannon [mailto:Teresa.Cannon @collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:40 AM To: Legals NDN Subject: BD-PL20130002506 -Jacoby Legals, Please advertise the attached Display Ad w/Map on Friday,June 6,2014.Thanks Teresa L. Cannon, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Department 239-252-8411 239-252-8408 fax Teresa.Cannon@collierclerk.com 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County NAPLES DAILY NEWS Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 26th,2014,in the Hearing Published Daily Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Naples,FL 34110 Fl 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20130002506 - Keith and Shannan Jacoby request a 10.4- Affidavit of i ublicatil foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the State of Florida 1 Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit Counties of Collier and Lee of Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens subdivision, also described as 215 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Before the undersigned they serve as t Florida. LITTLE LEE COUNTY appeared Robin Calabrese, who on oa HICKORY LELY BAY BONITA BEACH ROAD (C.R.865) Advertising Director of the Naples Dai BEACH . f newspaper published at Naples, in Col CONDO C �� _ PROJECT 5 N LOCATION °. distributed in Collier and Lee counties 6 1 '15 BOMTA LELY SHORES attached copy of the advertising being BAREFOOT ; BEACH AUDUBON Aba couN LEE CO. n f ` CLUB PUBLIC NOTICE 1AW o �� AUDUBON NAPOLI 'Tl _, 8 COUNTRY —VILLAGE , ` W ,, CLUB in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE `!�' a FOREST = 9 �6 ER N. ? j OAKS was published in said newspaper 1 tim WA ERC ADES RETREAT AZA on June 6, 2014. 1� *p OGNLEIVDRY ARBOR TRACE BST VILLAGE PLACE All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in Affiant further says that the said Na presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. published at Naples, in said Collier Cc newspaper has heretofore been contin' Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be County, Florida; distributed in Collie reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division,2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. each day and has been entered as sec office in Naples, in said Collier Count The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person year next preceding the first publican decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with advertisement; and affiant further say respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of promised any person, firm or corporal that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record commission or refund for the purpose of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon publication in the did newspaper. which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to t- participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision (Signature of affiant) of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, Florida 34112- 5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. SW to and subscrib d before me Mark Strain, MO 12th day o June 014 Chief Hearing Examiner n � Collier County, Florida (Signature of notary public) No.231148055 _ June 6.2014 ,.1,,pY'P„�.,, CAROL POLIDORA is: '„ :._ MY COMMISSION*EE 851758 • EXPIRES:November 28,2014 ,of °,, Bonded Thru Plchard Insurance Agency OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Minutes & Records, Clerk of Courts JUL 9 �uln01 4 FROM: Wanda Rodriguez,ACP DATE: July 8, 2014 RE: Hearing Examiner Decision(s) from June 26, 2014 Attached are the signed HEX decisions from the Hearing Examiner hearing on June 26, 2014. Attachments: HEX No. 2014— 14 HEX No. 2014— 15 05-COA-01253/744 HEX NO. 2014— 14 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. BD-PL20130002506 — Keith and Shannan Jacoby request a 10.4-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit of Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens subdivision, also described as 215 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. DATE OF HEARING: June 26, 2014 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the public, and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: Other than the applicant, there were no speakers in favor or opposed to this application. DECISION: Petition BD-PL20130002506, filed by Ben Nelson of Nelson Marine Construction, Inc., on behalf of Keith and Shannan Jacoby, with respect to the property hereinafter described, is hereby approved for a 10.4-foot extension of a boat dock over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels located on the hereinafter described property, in accordance with the Proposed Site Plan attached as Exhibit «A» ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Proposed Site Plan 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 23, Bayfront Gardens, a subdivision recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 114 through 117 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and that part of Lot 22 of said Bayfront Gardens more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point where the North line of said Lot 22 intersects with the survey control line of said subdivision, run N 76°46'53" W along said North line to the mean high water line of Little Hickory Bay, and a point herein called Point "A"; thence return to the point of beginning and run S 76°46'53" E along said North line a distance of 181.03 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 22; thence N 79°13'17" W to the mean high water line of Little Hickory Bay, thence northerly along said mean high water line to Point"A". APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. / 1° 14 V CJA Date Mark Strain, earing Examiner Appr ed as to for and legality: Scott A Stone Assistant County Attorney 13-CPS-01276/14 2 of 2 + ,,.y T \`q1 +04 �. tit N A + + +i� I +�1 `�ti \\> +y. +�5 4 +'ti <,> APPROXIMATE+ + 0 10' 20' + + <9 RIPARIAN LINE ". y?+ +5%,1. ,r SCALE: 1" = 201 , �• i ♦ ,4,`› 4 ' .•,i% N I' + '°>+ , p6 90• e ; �_1p- �. RED MANGROVE \ \ ,<1, +e pU i'. FRINGE - \ .. w �0 59 a . a• + +. �`• 11.4'. -l1 MEAN LOW +' O' ° 4 5 i WATER LINE • PROPOSED+INSTALLATION ç +�;k = % 11 —MEAN HH WATER I INc, e o �� 1 PROPERTY LINE ALUM-A-HOIST BOAT 1 _ ,s 1 T.O.B. LIFT AIOP (4) 10" BUTT 11 LIFT PILES 11 +1� +' 1 E.O.W. , 64+' o \ _' SURVEY TRAVERSE,LINE ` • 1 lNO 4, + 4+,- .„ ti. -4 �r/�,_. d DETAIL BELOW +° _1a i1 1 •• y is , ` ` +v 4-- + ^ 4x , •o' + PROPOSED 4' WIDE x 12' -i ti 0 4.5' WIDE x 30' LONG A G ,v, Y` . ` ` LONG REPLACEMENT OF • r)1 1, PROPOSED DOCK EXPANSION o>. +p ‘ •_ EXISTING WALKWAY •A + ao p> ,;::; %, b1\ �sl DEMO EXISTING i!l ; +�9 + `am + ?;.,�+ e e WALKWAY AND I•. �° ti+ ` 3 S,`. + BUTT PILINGS x�A j l,�: DEMO EXISTING BUTT E �11111111�11 ''v b" 4 + LIFT PILING +;,'N + ,>+ + \\\k\l ' 'APOriftt' *lip._•„ PROPOSED REPLACEMENT---�r-_`=>>> \. - • '` .> +\ OF 150 S.F. DECKING �' �+F - '^ •�� /��: ON EXISTING DOCK r ;> j + .lb ,•• MOST RESTRICTIVE EXISTING LIFT�� ;� ��`,,,�• i a POINT: . •�. �� . TO REMAIN \ + • .• �.. •% �. II gEo3ANTOP K , o,‘"3,0:+ - > i �..� .� �"`•�.�►, . 1 t.V 1 +y ' /` 1,111 i •`/`z♦ } h* lw♦ T'FURTHEST EXTE •�� 'ry , APPROXIMATE OF DOC C � ' d +s? ++`�RIPARIAN LINE w ti.+ 6e+ �,+ ``�ooDl 1111// 2 DETAIL o ..°11,00.010°` oy� �`+ +:, / +� ..,.),.` .c.NS,•,�� i� N.T.S. / \ i A,,+ % �r .� , ANR1�11� LL 2 3/2014 REYIS_7 PER COUNTY COMMENTS M.W.M. o 1 2/2014 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS M.w"M. + /� �fj� ' FRINGE =z Revision Dote Description By '+ '�/A `�(//�, '� * • r 1� "' i JACOBY DOCK EXPANSION i ' ATt Of SCAM•[i/ ©GradyMinor o.Grady Minor Associates.P.A. — ...•• 0 • , F n�o,m;cB 3800 Flu MI Rey / 0 P. Bonita Springs Florida 34134 , �:., SITE PLAN � •^ • civil Engineers • Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects �/ ' /ON Al- � Cm of Aura.EUW 151 Eem of.Ants.LB wa6131 Business LC 2WW2K Nnnitn Springs.239.047.1144 a ww.GradyAllaor.coin Fun Slyer,239.6901.1380 — I ,.,•."!PE D.r.2 MEET 1 OF 2 . Exhibit A - Page 1 of 2 C - ,- FASTEN W/SlAINI ESS STEEL RING SHANK SCREWS 2"x6" DECKING CARRIAGE BOLTS CRT) MATCH EXISTING TOP OF DECK ELEV. 0 E)Q........_ MACHINE BOLTS , 1 I 1 I ' 0 ....-Q------- (3) 2"x8" (2)2"xe CAP -- - STRINGERS .40 ONE EA. SIDE ASQ AS SHOWN OF PIUNG (TYP.) SIMPSON 45 ,'7-8" BUTT PILE 2.5 3 STRAP 0 MID C.C.A. 3% STRINGER, PENETRATION OR TIP. EA. 4' PUNCHED THRJ CONNECTION, ROCK 4-8d NAPLES TOP& SOT. g_MEAN HIGH WATER EL..(-)0.02' Iv MEAN LOW WATER E...=(-)0.58' DOCK SECTION PROPOSED EXIST. DOCK DOCK EXPANS ON ..-. PROPOSED INS1AJ_ATION OF i 1.3,000 LB. ALUM-A-HOIST I IFT ATOP(4) 10 BUTT I 8 IN 8 LIFT PILINGS. DEMO EXISTING BUTT . PILINGS AND WALKWAY .......," _ I I & .0 I ,MEAN HIGH WAI,R EL.=(-)0.02 x I I _ _ _ ___ I I I "WEAN LOW WATER EL.=(-)0.58't §. . . ' ' \:,', ' .,:y,>./...>",".\;, .' ., ''''' ' ' ' '. .•\/.;:s/C.;1,..;'-',-.7 ,N/ --:\: ',./ .."/"V',./\ •,' .. .. . ..-- . „ 1 ' 1..90Trom IND ■\N • littOtite, ..-- \N ODROW .f// 44) 4, // •.:„..,t/ ° s. 0 'S - .... N i DOCK CROSS SECTION --- , - -- * , NOTE: , 1 "-1 0'. VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 1988. •-••• 13; 2. PROPERTY IS LOCATED WI-HIN _COD ZONE AE. ";,.../3n STA 5324-4 /41Cr::::::-.:::;681 JACOBY DOCK EXPANSION •-:;*."". ' kce6S‘ r,t4cAr-- si". Q Grady Minor and Amorlates.PA. - 1111GradyMinor 3000 Vlu Del Rey Bonita Slalom Florida 31131 i ION AL ,V,.‘ 24,3 1 ChM Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects DOCK SECTIONS I ///, "nil i‘Illar"m' Cert.014100.BB 0003151 Cori.01,400.LB 001:6151 BIM..LC 20000200 Bonita Sprliiss 239.947 1144 a a Fr.Crady.1/1nor cow Fort Myers 277090 1390 Ti...Nrjaa,0,,,,,, SHEET 2 OF 2 Exhibit A - Page 2 of 2 20D )) Friday,June 6,2014 )) NAPLES DAILY NEWS .v U.LUG/IDI PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 26th,2014,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Fl 34104,to consider: PETITION NO. BD-PL20130002506 — Keith and Shannan Jacoby request a 10.4- foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 30.4 feet to replace and expand the existing docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit of Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens subdivision, also described as 215 Bayfront Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. um' LEE COUNTY HICKORY LELY BAY BONITA BEACH ROAD (C.R.865) BAREFOOT CONDO C� _� ' PROJECT LOCATION •6 15 BORES LELY SHORES BAREFOOT C AUDUBON BEACHCOUNTRY CLUB LEE CO. ,71111pr ° COUNTRY ALLUDE cal CLUB B BAY U 9 E Rf - FOREST Z STERLI N• OAKS x ¢ Two S THE PLAZA WAIERGLADES PLAZA \` U RETREAT A..W ON THE GLEN EDBAY EN BROOK' ARBOR TRACE ■ALLAOE PLACE ST /I All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Naples, Florida 34112- 5356, (239)252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida EXHIBIT No.231148058 June 6.2014 $ A W/irn/r4, I AGENDA ITEM 4-A Co er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION HEARING: JUNE 26, 2014 SUBJECT: BD-PL20130002506, JACOBY BOAT DOCK EXTENSION PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owners: Keith& Shannan Jacoby Agent: Ben Nelson 215 Bayfront Drive Nelson Marine Construction, Inc. Bonita Springs, FL 34135 10923 Enterprise Avenue Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests a 10.4-foot boat dock extension over the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, which will allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a total of 30.4 feet into a waterway that is 258 feet wide. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is located at 215 Bayfront Drive in Bonita Springs and is further described as Lot 23 and a portion of Lot 22, Bayfront Gardens. The folio number is 23095002304. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is a request for a 10.4-foot boat dock extension beyond the maximum of 20 feet for the subject lot. There is an existing dock on the site. The dock will be reconfigured to contain two slips. The dock will protrude a total of 30.4 feet into a waterway that is approximately 258 feet in width. There is no dredging proposed for this project and the total length shoreline is approximately 120 linear feet. A single-family house exists on the site. BD-PL20130002506 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT Jacoby Boat Dock Extension. 211,11162 LIM MICMOlt LEE COUNTY .a.,A a ..a.,, °Q pi LOCATION ©� PUD �� ©�® C'PROJECT �. 1. ..R. a oa°, d ©SIFLY BAREFOOT EAOI 01 e ►� ^ LEE COUNTY , ��a©t� rar .<. ©fie ,rA,� ®�'1/ o ArOpsbat 4144 V-17. ...... .....:-1 LT.1 ••••••-t �� W Vvow AY 81TE ��,, aw0°" LOCATION anl , glirl°11 OA'''s40,4 1212i HICKORY BAY , ... rte ;�; ,L=,'aTt re_— . •- s _ a z " ROW w 44 'V 49 .�� O w CCCL to o 0 m O ttot, 9 �g ilwY ____.,,M. ..... I on 00. e It VINIIIMM Mkt - MOM =CC: 00111°Witiliff o NI e•C-'..- 171 ' wr it LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP PETITION #BD-PL-2013-2506 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Single-family house, zoned PUD (Lely Barefoot Beach) SURROUNDING: North: Vacant lot, zoned PUD East: Bayfront Drive, across which is a preserve area, zoned PUD South: Single-family house with a boat dock, zoned PUD West: Little Hickory Bay, across which are single-family houses, zoned PUD lik 44i:iv* _ ,,, ill‘ .. lk Ift 4/4.44i y # •* ' ' tr, ,. . .�4 t Straw Aerial of subject property(CCPA) ' 1 ,- ;fir 'raw ft . woo- 1. Ilk r / ,,,4%,/ .' 1_ ;, I f �\ '. _ �. Bird's eye view of subject property(Bing) ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: BD-PL20130002506 Page 3 of 8 Jacoby Boat Dock Extension. 1 Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. Section 5.03.06(E)(11), of the Land Development Code (LDC), Manatee Protection, is applicable to multi-slip docking facilities with ten(10) or more slips. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the HEX to approve this request, it must find that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 and recommends the following findings to the HEX: Primary Criteria 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks,additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility consists of 2 boat slips, which is appropriate in relation to the 120 linear feet of water frontage of the subject lot. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s)described without an extension.) Criterion met. According to the petitioner's application the water depth for the proposed dock facility is too shallow to accommodate the vessels.. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) BD-PL20130002506 Page 4 of 8 Jacoby Boat Dock Extension. Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed facility will not adversely impact navigation due to the width of the existing waterway. The applicant notes that the facility has been designed to protrude less than neighboring docks, so that it does not impede navigation. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. Information provided in the application indicates that the proposed dock will protrude 30.4 feet (12 percent) into a waterway that is 258 feet in width. Therefore, the dock facility will maintain more than the required minimum of 50 percent of the waterway as open. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. According to the drawings submitted and noted by the petitioner, the proposed facility has been designed to fall within the subject riparian lines (with a required side-yard of greater than 15 feet) and does not interfere with adjacent neighboring docks or access. Secondary Criteria 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth,or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The subject shoreline is natural, not hardened, and it supports a mangrove fringe. Florida Statutes permit minimal trimming, however the dock protrusion permits the preservation of the existing mangrove fringe. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. As shown on the drawing submitted by the petitioner, the dock area is not excessive,permitting the docking of two vessels. BD-PL20130002506 Page 5 of 8 Jacoby Boat Dock Extension. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion met. As indicated on the application, the width of the vessels is 55 feet; therefore, the proposed dock is less than 50 percent of the property's 120 feet of shoreline. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The view shed of neighboring properties will not be impacted. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, no seagrass beds were found within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. Therefore, there will be no impact to seagrass beds. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion not applicable. The petitioner's property is a single-family lot with two slips and is not subject to the provisions of the Manatee Protection Plan. Staff analysis indicates that this request meets five of the five primary criteria. Regarding the six secondary criteria, criterion 6 is not applicable, and the request meets five of the remaining five secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the HEX takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Division Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the HEX. In the event that the petition has been approved by the HEX, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. BD-PL20130002506 Page 6 of 8 Jacoby Boat Dock Extension. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The Office of the County Attorney reviewed the Staff Report for BD-PL20130002506 on June 10, 2014. SAS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BD-PL20130002506. BD-PL20130002506 Page 7 of 8 Jacoby Boat Dock Extension. PREPARED BY: i -4/ --i-e___--- C-9- / FRED '`ISCHL, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE PLANNING& ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: .6 -7 . f4 ec: Re) RAY D V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE PLA G &ZONING DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: ,-X,< ,:... MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BD-PL20130002506 Page 8 of 8 Jacoby Boat Dock Extension. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION / BOATHOUSE PETITION THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): ❑ DOCK EXTENSION L BOATHOUSE BD-PL20130002506 REV: 2 PROJECT NUMBER 215 BAYFRONT DRIVE PROJECT NAME DATE: 2/24/14 DATE PROCESSED DUE: 3/10/14 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(S) Keith & Shannan Jacoby ADDRESS 215 Bayfront Drive CITY Bonita Spings STATE FL Zip 34135 TELEPHONE # (239) 821-0816 CELL# N/A FAX# N/A E-MAIL Keith.jacoby @wfadvisors.com NAME OF AGENT Ben Nelson FIRM Nelson Marine Construction, Inc. ADDRESS 10923 Enterprise Ave CITY Bonita Springs STATE FL ZIP 34135 TELEPHONE # (239) 992-4443 CELL# N/A FAX# (239) 992-0765 E-MAIL Beth @ nelsonmarine.com BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.colliergov.net PROPERTY LOCATION Address of Subject Property 215 Bayfront Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Section/Township/Range 6 /48 /35 Property Ip.D. Subdivision Bayfront Gardens Unit Lots); as or '� Block(s) Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property PUD (Single Family Residential) ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N PUD Single-Family Residential S PUD Single-Family Residential E PUD Single-Family Residential W PUD Single-Family Residential DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project(indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): Proposed 4.5'x30'dock expansion, 150 sq.ft. decking replacement, 13,000lb lift installation. The following must be accompanying this application: 1) A signed, sealed survey depicting mean high water (MHW) and mean low water (MLW), and relevant water depths measured at no less than 5-foot increments 2)A chart, drawn to scale, of the waterway at the site, depicting the waterway width, the proximity of the proposed facility to any adjacent navigable channel, the proximity of the proposed facility to docks, if any, on the adjacent lots, and the unobstructed waterway between the proposed facility and the opposite bank or any dock facility on the opposite bank 3)A site plan to scale showing dimensions and location of existing and proposed dock structures, as well as a cross section showing the facility in relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall or rip-rap revetment). • CoLier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net SITE INFORMATION Width of waterway: 258' ft.; Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ❑ other(specify) Total property water frontage: 120' ft. Setbacks: provided 29.3' ft. required 15' ft. Total protrusion of proposed facility into water: 30.4' ft. Number and length of vessels to use facility: 1. 30' ft., 2. 25' ft., 3. ft. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: All docks in close proximity extend 45' plus. For all petitions, in the case of signs located on properties 1 acres or more in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign(s). what is the size of the property? 0.44 acres Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ No If so, please provide copies. The following criteria, (pursuant to Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code) shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), and by the CCPC in its decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the CCPC to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. Please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Attach additional pages if necessary. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net PRIMARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. ((The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi-family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate)) The(1)proposed slip is consistent with other surrounding properties and appropriate in relation to waterfront length,upland use&zoning. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). ((The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension)) Water depth is too shallow to accommodate the boat at mean low tide without the addition(boats may draw as much as 3.5 at MLT.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. ((The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel)) Facility will not have adverse effect on navigation within adjacent marked/channel and does not intrude navigable or impede vessel traffic. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. ((The facility should maintain the required percentages)). Facility does not protrude more than 25%of width of waterway and more than 50%of waterway will be maintained for navigation. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. ((The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks)) The proposed design and location of the dock facility will not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. Colllier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. ((There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds)) The dock needs to be extended to provide proper distance from mangrove fringe. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. ((The facility should not use excessive deck area)) The proposed dock provides reasonable safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading,routine maintenance without the use of excessive dock area. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. ((The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained)) This is a single-f amlly residential lot and the total length of the boat will not exceed 50%of the total width of the lot(25+30=55 x 2=110)as the lot is 120'wide. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. ((The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.)) The proposed facility will not have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. ((If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.1 of this code must be demonstrated)) There are no known seagrass areas within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06.E.11 of this code. ((If applicable, compliance with Section 5.03.06.E.ii must be demonstrated)) Single-family docking facilities are not subject to the requirements set forth in the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan. Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.coiliergov.net I HEREBY ATTEST THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND THAT, IN ADDITION TO APPROVAL OF THIS DOCK EXTENSION, A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. I UNDERSTAND THAT IF THIS DOCK EXTENSION PETITION IS APPROVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, AN AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE HEARING. IF I PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION DURING THIS TIME, I DO SO AT MY OWN RISK. Signature of Petitioner or Agent BD-PL20130002506 REV: 2 215 BAYFRONT DRIVE - DATE: 2/24/14 DUE: 3/10/14 9? conty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.colliergov.net As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. Keith M. Jacoby & AFFIDAVIT We/l, Sharman P.Jacoby being first duly sworn, depose and say that well am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. Well understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner Well further authorize Nelson Marine to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding f is Itition. 1 Signature of Property Oyvner Sigr(a9re of Property,!Owner 1 Keith M.Jacoby Sharman P.Jacoby Typed or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 day of 55"--Z-7-ri5rr4 20 13, by 5-1.+4,-.7,c)/iii -3-74<o lY who is personally known to me or has produced 17; 71 "1"../ as identification. State of Florida (Signature of Notary Public-State of Florida) County of Collier (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name TIM FARRELL of Notary Public) 'r MY COMMISSION#EE853542 I EXPIRES November 25,2016 (407)398-0133 FbWa BD-PL20130002506 REV: 2 215 BAYFRONT DRIVE DATE:2/24/14 DUE: 3/10114 a x q9 ° ++ + t "4 ,"° ey + } e'+ y N 4 + +a `. l9 + 1 1 + + +0) y APPROXIMATE+ Vii• ; o is 2a +' ..,9 .;P RIPARIAN LINE J.?+ +'°\.,y ; SCALE: 1"=20' + + +,,° i t 9 .o + +A� 15 "° + b \' 94 A._ �= 5' y7 ss• 0.4 + A ,../ 1 \ q •;,' t b + ,+ o�z_-co O y 90' K. // RED MANGROVE \ • FRINGE \ A.\ + ,4+ °+ ,°+ q' +eo+ +° 4a o•�1.A'. MEAN LOW +� \ . 4- + o• ,° b y 45 1 1 WATER LINE \ PROPOSED INSTALLATION +q _,+;\',.3L-5'_ "L � \ MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, OF A 13,000 LB. -^' °.v j �� 1 PROPERTY LINE ALUM-A-HOIST BOAT ;'- 'o_ , LIFT ATOP (4) 10" BUTT 1�1 1 T.O.B. • • LIFT PILES 1 +,. �, . + +1+ + 'CI o • i SURVEY TRAVERSE,LINE '.r �` • DETAIL BELOW o• �\ '°•A\\ 14 f ". }v1 }1`• ^ a ��..j�A. .O9 ly -_-- , iii. �� \ °� + j PROPOSED 4' WIDE x 12' -� 11��4.5' WIDE x 30' LONG 1 ",. LONG REPIACEMENT OF ��' 1 , PROPOSED DOCK EXPANSION °y +� � • EXISTING WALKWAY : �� °q +°`+ oo , 'i +ti° '�1 .9`, -DEMO EXISTING '� 1 ';� +09 + + r � e ` :.., ...- WALKWAY AND 1: + 1e b'+ ,.4. ':.p .1 '3\'.∎ BUTT PILINGS 1 l I�� DEMO EXISTING BUTT F%% �;�`"`4)'•—''ti, ✓�� + +•,' +;`' LIFT PILINGS +Ay '+ r,:„...,-,..„.....\ I t' •-'.It I ,a•U__ f I• gyp+ + 1 ale I —>:=`i " \ 1.I I..,ice y PROPOSED REPLACEMENT v �' ► .4 ' ,`b + OF 150 S.F. DECKING a� %' ? 'y 1 \• • ��. , ON EXISTING DOCK t. - ;k• ■ + �� Vo 0� MOST RESTRICTIVE9 1` • '11,��. EXISTING LIFT �v POINT: t A ` f.•�• •v,er�.� „•.: _�� TO REMAIN N :� �� •Iii •� EXIST. TOP c 1 , `,*� Qin/ •.. OF BANK i o r' q+ • \� 1 A AN '- , ��i •� Z\30;;/ y .ty •� ♦ a 1,--..._.„,,,,.., , bb 4+ �'. 1 �� .. l �' 1 / tl1 1 ,2 + t 7 +eo +ey +"9 t�d 7y m■• Ilielossi FURTHEST EXTENT ,\ :,..,,,....--‘ 9y ' APPROXIMATE OF DOCK �' ,°> +� }%'RIPARIAN LINE t b • e 63R , DETAIL ' + } +,4 ,,• +� ems.°. �� NSF •,f1�j , :. N.T.S./ F "S qe+ �% ,cr. , �X NAN�{�(�V 2 3/2014 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS Y.W.M. ('. r (//��///�� " FRINGE ; f�' 1 2/2014 REVISED PER COUN71'COMMENTS M.W.Y. + �'V//i1 _• Revision Date Description By ti• r * ; LLI JACOBY DOCK EXPANSION 'r'^d■ .'TA'�• 3CAtE: ` �� la GradyMinor O.CredvMIorandAvodaldRey , ` .� I. 3800 Via Dd Rey ��/' ()•Bonita Springs.Florida 34134 `j , ' Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects SITE PLAN 0,///y1, '-^ r' ” Cert.or kith.EB 0005151 Celt of Ada.LB 0005151 Boldness LC 3000U20fi I•) •JO N AL ��7 - BonllaSPrinp:239.9-17.1144 ,,nw.CradyAllnor.cam Fort 11Fero:239.090.43` i �run HEET 1 OF 2 .. BD-PL20130002506 REV: 3 215 BAYFRONT DRIVE DATE: 4/23/14 DUE: 5/7/14 • 4.5' FASTEN W/STAINLESS STEEL RING SHANK SCREWS (2) 1/2" 2"x5 DECKING CARRIAGE �.4D ASQ #1 Bolts (TYP.) MATCH EXISTING TOP OF DECK ELEV. (2) 5/8"H.C. C I MACHINE BOLTS (TYP.) ---T1 0-'-',.-,.„..,_____ (3) 2"x8" (2) 2"x8"CAP STRINGERS .40 ONE EA. SIDE ASQ AS SHOWN OF PILING(TYP.) SIMPSON H5 8" BUTT PILE 2.5 STRAP®MID C.C.A. 33°%a STRINGER, PENETRATION OR TYP. EA. 4' PUNCHED THRU CONNECTION, ROCK 4-8d NAPLES TOP x COT. 2E HIGH WATER EL.=(-)0.02' a MEAN LOW WATER EL.=(-)0.58' I — DOCK SECTION 1/2"=1'-0° EXIST. DOCK PROPOSED DOCK EXPANSION PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF a 13,000 LB.ALUM-A-HOIST I LIFT ATOP(4) 10" BUTT c LIFT PILINGS. I DEMO EXISTING BUTT PILINGS AND WALKWAY I—_ _ L-- I I ' I .MEAN HIGH WATER EL=(-)0.02 I Tr I iNiul I IV EAN LOW WATER EL=(-)0.58'0 \i\/\�\ \/v \• \•••• \ \� / / , /\ \ `'"/ / ' /• .,\.� i o o��aQaa`° ��® `\ AkQ W ,, 1 3 `o��4 .. Ni-4.-,'�4 //�� 2 DOCK CROSS SECTION g;` a• 5324 ` NOTE: i"=10' = "h. ,7k 1. VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 1988. = .O I �' i X 2. PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE AE. �� STA �� JACOBY DOCK EXPANSION �\tl��{y' ' y ell Q.O.Orad)'Miooraatl Associates. �j Rl v/ 30001'1•Del Rey �, + - BON;Springs.Florida 34134 f® Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects DOCK SECTIONS ✓/'//lJj NAi1 a ml� - Led..of Aug.EH 0005151 Crn.ofAa16.L30006151 Bagnrrs LC 28000_266 xOPsraco� Bonita Spring.239.947.114! wirrr.Cradrd//nor.rom Pod.Myers:239.690.4380 auxe.aamt PL w aOPoM P.E fAEME/p.15721 SHEET 2 OF 2 / HEX 6-26-14 PDI—PL201 40000504 NAPLES VIEW Ann P. Jennejohn From: Deselem, Kay Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:08 PM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Patricia L. Morgan; Neet, Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda; Kendall, Marcia; Wells, Laura Subject: Naples view PUD, PDI-PL20140000504 Attachments: (2X3) map.pdf; NDN ad.docx Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Also please provide confirmation for approval to my attention prior to proceeding. Please reference the petition name and project name on all correspondence. Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services--Planning d Zoning Department Growth Management Division--Planning cf Regulation 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Nap/es, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2931 Fax: 239-252-6357 kaydese/em @colliergo v.ne t Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request.do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Deselem, Kay Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:13 PM To: Rodriguez, Wanda; Ann P. Jennejohn Cc: Stone, Scott; Ashton, Heidi Subject: RE: Naples view PUD, PDI-PL20140000504 Yes, it was a last minute add on. It is in there now. Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services--Planning&Zoning Department growth Management Division--Planning& Regulation 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2931 Fax: 239-252-6357 kaydeselem @co/liergo v.ne t From: RodriguezWanda Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:11 PM To: DeselemKay; Ann P. Jennejohn Cc: StoneScott; AshtonHeidi Subject: FW: Naples view PUD, PDI-PL20140000504 Kay and Ann, The ad title conforms to the one approved by this office, and the requested run date is appropriate. Ok to proceed. Heidi and Scott, FYI, this item was not in Report Manager when we last reviewed items for the 6/26/14 HEX hearing. Wanda Rodriguez, MCP .Advanced Certified ParaCegaC Office of the County .Attorney (239)252-8400 From: DeselemKay Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:08 PM To: Minutes and Records May 21, 2014 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Friday June 6, 2014, and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Kay Deselem, Principal Planner in the Planning & Zoning Department, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DEPARTMENT: PLANNING &ZONING Zoning Services Section FUND & COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 450046717 Account Number: 076397 Authorized Designee signature for HEX Advertising PDI-P120140000504 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, June 26th, 2014, in the Hearing Examiner's meeting room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, FL 34104, to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000504— 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC is requesting an insubstantial change to the Naples View RPUD, Ordinance No. 2012-22, to remove townhouse dwelling units and two-family, duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses; reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 dwelling units; amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; add new LDC deviations relating to boundary marker signs and project entrance ground or wall signs; change the name of the PUD Managing Entity; and delete development commitments relating to the Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access and facilities. The subject property is located on the east side of Airport Pulling Rd, south of Orange Blossom Dr., in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.32± acres. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida _ (n K Or K > 0 P1 0 T. * -< v) m I- 7J F z �z -< (I) > >1 mD m mz I L_ 2 m r m 0 c X00 N m D -< mm oD rK r X m 0 X� ------,„m> m > 71 � m cri _ z 073 (n m 1 D r M \ >_ M rmD -<m xir AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD > °0>z BUCKLEY Y Eh.,... 0 (C.R. 31) °r°o 0 Z -0 o D G� CO D O M-1 XI D rte/ 0r— �Nz O D m ; c -ix � r m0 om Dc) J0 � z C r * z-I0 DN N 0 X n -I D n v m z r XI< z N Z\rn 0 0 DZ * V)D z z X _,_, -r1 (n D - / M. C S m z 0 V)—< -1 D _�I u) 1 Del ; O v0 zN C D 00 > N _ -I m I '0H NCISONIAll c) o > I > D z 0 7J = v� r m 0 mm Q cz cn En z 0 H z —1 D 0 ^ m 0 cr m — rn 0 m —1 p n I N Z -# 7J 0 > 0 INTERSTATE - 75 Acct #076397 May 21, 2014 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 Re: PDI-PL20140000504 (Display Ad w/Map) Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice (w/Map) on Friday, June 6, 2014 and send Duplicate Affidavits of Publication to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500146717 May 21, 2014 Collier County Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on Friday June 6, 2014, and send the proof(s) of publication to the Minutes & Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite #401, Naples, Florida, 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & ZONING Zoning Services Section PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 450046717 Account Number: 076397 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, June 26th, 2014, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610,Naples, FL, 34104 to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000504 — 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC is requesting an insubstantial change to the Naples View RPUD, Ordinance No. 2012-22, to remove townhouse dwelling units and two-family, duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses; reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 dwelling units; amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; add new LDC deviations relating to boundary marker signs and project entrance ground or wall signs; change the name of the PUD Managing Entity; and delete development commitments relating to the Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access and facilities. The subject property is located on the east side of Airport Pulling Rd, south of Orange Blossom Dr., in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.32± acres. (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida = (,) K o r I- rr O 0 -0 Z < rn D r x �> in rn D r 5� nz -< ( > m 2 I L_ m= \TI rn m r D rnCO gyp_ N r K > 0Dm --1-I xm z 7)o DT. X _ � m 0 0m vm)> m C-I rn N� _I 1- -CU mD m — x> AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD > co zZ BUCKLEY Y [Iiz r'� _o� c� CO 7J-Ian D // mr oZ 0 n D M M z =D� � O ZO Mm x) H Q = -4 C r m0 D0 in 0 70 Z O Z K O' xrn mz Z vi (A Z \M 0 00 x>m * 0D z N D =M -1 -0 5 Oc -0 Li OD Q m _< (f)r D \ m m z C -0 73 OD U, e 0 . _, 2 -, I 'ab NCISONIAIl O OCZ Z Q D 0 r 0 0 7J _ 2 m z rn u) O w z0 m n O Z F = D x � m IF ?jc X D CO crim -1 — m .� Q D D O n N 2 Fl Z H - 0 > 0 INTERSTATE - 75 Ann P. Jennejohn To: legals @naplesnews.com Subject: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) Attachments: PDI-PL20140000504.doc; PDI-PL20140000504.doc; PDI-PL20140000504.pdf Hi again, Please advertise the attached Display Ad (w/Map) on Friday, June 6, 2014. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 239-252-8408 (Fax) 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Flora, Susan <susan.flora @naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:44 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn; Naples Daily News Legals Subject: RE: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) Attachments: NDN231130879 CC Hex Proof 06.06.14.pdf Please see the attached proof and provide approval ASAP for publication on 06.06.14. Thank you, Susan Flora Susan Flora General Sales Support Assistant Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples,FL 34110 0:(239)435-3428 F:(239)325-1251 susan.flora(u�naalesnews.com I naplesnews.com ( ndnadvertising.com Putting Your World In Your Hands Call or click today to activate! (239)213-6000 or naplesnews.com/subscribe From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.JennejohnOcollierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 4:29 PM To: Legals NDN Subject: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) Hi again, Please advertise the attached Display Ad (w/Map) on Friday, June 6, 2014. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 239-252-8408 (Fax) Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. 1 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 26th,2014, in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, FL, 34104 to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000504 - 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC is requesting an insubstantial change to the Naples View RPUD, Ordinance No. 2012-22, to remove townhouse dwelling units and two-family,duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses; reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 dwelling units;amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; add new LDC deviations relating to boundary marker signs and project entrance ground or wall signs; change the name of the PUD Managing Entity; and delete development commitments relating to the Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access and facilities. The subject property is located on the east side of Airport Pulling Rd, south of Orange Blossom Dr., in Section 1,Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.32± acres. MARKER LAKE FOUNTAIN < VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD VILLAS �/� PARK VINEYARDS WALGREENS BRIGHTON (DRI) Ni GARDENS O MONTEREY O VINEYARDS EMERALD Y CITRUS Z LAKES NI GARDENS OAK P (DRI) c"ausLE visa(s) GROVE 6 2 REGENCY SAVANNAH LAGOON M LAKES 1 PROJECT SLEEPY \ ITw•N a CENTEREW FIRST LOCATION HOLLOW —AMEINCAN BAPTIST TUEj,E/— B LONE CHURCH BEAR OAK F.W. CREEK (F. KEYSTONE PLACE M__ MANCHESTER WILLOW TOP HAT SQUARE O PARK AUTO O COMMUNITY SCHOOL 11 PINE AIR • () OF NAPS—. 7 LAKES PARK (DRI) 4 CENTRAL 12 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NORTH CYPRESS UNIT 35 to / SUM ND GLEN All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida No.231130879 June 6.2014 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Deselem, Kay Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:06 AM To: Ann P.Jennejohn; Rodriguez,Wanda Subject: RE: Naples View Notice June 26 HEX Hearing (PDI-PL20140000504) It is a thing of beauty. Go for it.© Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services--Planning&Zoning Department Growth Management Division--Planning& Regulation 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Nap/es, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2931 Fax: 239-252-6357 kaydeselem@colliergov.net From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.JennejohnCa�collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:04 AM To: DeselemKay; RodriguezWanda Subject: Naples View Notice June 26 HEX Hearing (PDI-PL20140000504) Hi there, Please review the attached notice for Naples View PDI-PL20140000504, that will be published next Friday, June 6th for a June 26th HEX Hearing, and send an approval and/or comments at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 239-252-8408 (Fax) From: Flora, Susan [mailto:susan.flora(anaplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:44 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn; Naples Daily News Legals Subject: RE: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) Please see the attached proof and provide approval ASAP for publication on 06.06.14. Thank you, Susan Flora Susan Flora General Sales Support Assistant 1 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:11 AM To: Deselem, Kay;Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: RE: Naples View Notice June 26 HEX Hearing (PDI-PL20140000504) I concur, good to go! "Wanda Rodriguez, .ACT .advanced Certified TaraCegaC Office of the County .attorney (239)252-8400 From: DeselemKay Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:06 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn; RodriguezWanda Subject: RE: Naples View Notice June 26 HEX Hearing (PDI-PL20140000504) It is a thing of beauty. Go for it.© Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services--Planning cf Zoning Department Growth Management Division--Planning cf Regulation 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2931 Fax: 239-252-6357 kaydeselem @colliergo v.ne t From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn(acollierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:04 AM To: DeselemKay; RodriguezWanda Subject: Naples View Notice June 26 HEX Hearing (PDI-PL20140000504) Hi there, Please review the attached notice for Naples View PDI-PL20140000504, that will be published next Friday, June 6th for a June 26th HEX Hearing, and send an approval and/or comments at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Minutes & Records Dept. Ann P. Jennejohn From: Flora, Susan <susan.flora @naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:38 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Subject: RE: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) Your ad has been released for publishing. Thank you, Susan Flora From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn@icollierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:13 AM To: Flora, Susan Subject: RE: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) Looks great Susan, please publish next Friday, June 6th. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk of the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 239-252-8408 (Fax) From: Flora, Susan [mailto:susan.flora(anaplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:44 AM To: Ann P. Jennejohn; Naples Daily News Legals Subject: RE: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) Please see the attached proof and provide approval ASAP for publication on 06.06.14. Thank you, Susan Flora Susan Flora General Sales Support Assistant Naples Daily News 1100 Immokalee Road Naples,FL 34110 0:(239)435-3428 F:(239)325-1251 susan.flora(&,,naalesnews.com I naplesnews.com ndnadvertising.com Putting Your World In Your Hands Call or click today to activate! (239)213-6000 or naplesnews.com/subscribe From: Ann P. Jennejohn [mailto:Ann.JennejohnPcollierclerk.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 4:29 PM To: Legals NDN Subject: PDI-PL20140000504 Display Ad (w/MAP) 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 26th,2014,in the Hearing NAPLES DAILY NEWS Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Published Daily FL, 34104 to consider: Naples,FL 34110 PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000504 - 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC is requesting an insubstantial change to the Naples View RPUD, Ordinance No. 2012-22, to Affidavit of Publicatio remove townhouse dwelling units and two-family,duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses; reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 State of Florida dwelling units;amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; add new LDC deviations relating to boundary Counties of Collier and Lee marker signs and project entrance ground or wall signs; change the name of the PUD Managing Entity;and delete development commitments relating to the Before the undersigned they serve as th; Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access and facilities. The subject property is appeared Robin Calabrese,who on oath located on the east side of Airport Pulling Rd, south of Orange Blossom Dr., in Advertising Director of the Naples Daily Section 1,Township 49 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida,consisting newspaper published at Naples, in Colli of 11.32±acres. distributed in Collier and Lee counties e MARKER LAKE FOUNTAIN < VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD VILLAS I 1I PARK VINEYARDS attached copy of the advertising, being " WALGREENS S BRIGHTON (DRI) gI GARDENS MONTEREY CITRUS 2 VINEYARDS EMERALD GARDENS (SRI) LAKES CHANCE OAK o 6 PUBLIC NOTICE �� " RCR I SIENA GROVE z RECENCY •• s"/_`"1"" LAKES PROJECT SLEEPY \J�� I/ LONGVEW FIRST LOCATION CEN ER HOLLOW — ITALY AN BAPTIST in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE zl i CLue LDNE CHURCH BEM OAK V.F.W. CREEK IS) was published in said newspaper 1 time KEYSTONE PLAC \ ^ on June 6, 2014. o WILLOW PARK TOP T HAT SQUARES ER a0 PARK TOTO MANCHE C n COMMUNITY N Z x SCHOOL ..} 11 PINE AIR -,' U OF NAPLES 7 H Affiant further says that the said Napl, (ARE) 2 CENTRAL 12 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Z says R NORTH CYPRESS GLEN UNIT 35 published at Naples, in said Collier Cou g � SUM "°� P / newspaper has heretofore been continue All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in County, Florida; distributed in Collier al presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. each day and has been entered as secon. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be I office in Naples, in said Collier County, reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe year next preceding the first publicatio Drive, Naples, FL. I advertisement; and affiant further says ti The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person promised any person, firm or corporatio decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with commission or refund for the purpose o' respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of publication in to- s.id newspaper. that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to partici- (Signature of affiant) pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- Sworn to and subscribed before me 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Tlyi ' 12th day o June 2014 Mark Strain, ? Chief Hearing Examiner J�tt �( /.1-7717 iCollier County, Florida (Signature of notary public) No.231130879 June 6.2014 0 P CAROL POLIDORA MY COMMISSION#EE 851758 - :•7,n.,..ki: EXPIRES:November 28,2014 • ",f of�civ Bonded Thru Pickard Insurance Agency OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Minutes & Records, Clerk of Courts JUL 9 �uln01 4 FROM: Wanda Rodriguez,ACP DATE: July 8, 2014 RE: Hearing Examiner Decision(s) from June 26, 2014 Attached are the signed HEX decisions from the Hearing Examiner hearing on June 26, 2014. Attachments: HEX No. 2014— 14 HEX No. 2014— 15 05-COA-01253/744 HEX NO. 2014— 15 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000504 — 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC is requesting an insubstantial change to the Naples View RPUD, Ordinance No. 2012-22, to remove townhouse dwelling units and two-family, duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses; reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 dwelling units; amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; add new LDC deviations relating to boundary marker signs and project entrance ground or wall signs; change the name of the PUD Managing Entity; and delete development commitments relating to the Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access and facilities. The subject property is located on the east side of Airport Pulling Rd, south of Orange Blossom Dr., in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.32± acres. DATE OF HEARING: June 26, 2014 STAFF RECOMMENDATION:, Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the public, and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: After a brief presentation by the applicant, two members of the public spoke concerning this application. The applicant's presentation included additional justification for the removal of the interconnection to the commercial parcel abutting their north property line. Due to the reduction in density and changes to the project plan, the remaining viable location for an interconnection would place it alongside an already existing sidewalk connection on Airport Road. This would negate any substantial benefit of such an added interconnection. The applicant also addressed an additional concern from discussions with the adjacent Walden Oaks community. One of the deviations requested by the applicant was to add a boundary marker to the southern property corner. The applicant noted this boundary marker will be applied to their wall feature and not create a visibility issue to vehicles exiting Walden Oaks. Page 1 of 3 The first public speaker stated he represented the existing Walden Oaks residential community that borders the applicant's property on three sides. The speaker expressed support for the changes proposed to the Naples View project. The second public speaker requested clarification regarding access to Airport Road by the Naples View project. At one time there was a proposal to connect Naples View to the main entry of Walden Oaks and share that connection point to Airport Road. The speaker was assured that such a connection to Walden Oaks was not part of this application and the connection point for the Naples View project remains as previously approved. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20140000504, filed by Alexis Crespo,AICP of Waldrop Engineering, representing 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company, with respect to the property as described herein, for the following insubstantial changes: 1. to remove townhouse/townhome dwelling units and two-family, duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses and development standards; 2. Combine"R1" and"R2" Residential Tracts into a single "Residential Tract"category; 3. to reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 dwelling units; 4. to amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; 5. to add new LDC deviations relating to a boundary marker sign and project entrance ground or wall signs; 6. to change the name of the PUD Managing Entity; and 7. to delete development commitments relating to the Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle interconnections and facilities. Said changes are fully described in the Naples View RPUD amendment attached as Exhibit "A". ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—RPUD Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: North one-half(N 1/2) of the North one-half(N '/2) of the Southwest one-quarter (SW 'A) of the Southwest one-quarter(SW 1/4) of Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, excepting therefrom the West 100 feet thereof for State road right-of-way. Page 2 of 3 APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. - 20 1( A.4 ail, Date Mar Strain, Hearing Examiner Appr ed as to fo; and legality: Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney 14-CPS-01315/15 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 1 of 8 Naples View RPUD Amend Ordinance Number 12-22 AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT A OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 12-22, THE NAPLES VIEW RPUD. The "List of Permitted Uses," labeled Exhibit A of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 12-22, the Naples View PUD, is hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT B OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 12-22, THE NAPLES VIEW RPUD. The"Development Standards," labeled Exhibit B of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 12-22, the Naples View PUD, is hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT C OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 12-22, THE NAPLES VIEW RPUD. The "PUD Master Plan," labeled Exhibit C of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 12-22, the Naples View PUD, is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by Exhibit C as attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT E OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 12-22, THE NAPLES VIEW RPUD. The "List of Requested Deviations from LDC," labeled Exhibit E of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 12-22,the Naples View PUD, is hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT F OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 12-22, THE NAPLES VIEW RPUD. The "Development Commitments," labeled Exhibit F of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 12-22,the Naples View PUD, is hereby amended as attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Exhibit "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES NAPLES VIEW RPUD PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses and Structures: R-1 Residential Tracts 1. Single-family detached dwelling units 2. Zero lot line units•3. - . ' . . . - . 4. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, fishing docks,walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts. "R2" Decidential T.actc 1. Single family detached dwelling units 2. Zero lot line units 3. Two family, duplex dwelling units 5. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools, tennis courts, board courts. Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals and Hearing Examiner pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and utility buildings. 2. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, fishing docks, walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 4. Entry Gates& Gatehouse. 5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Water management facilities. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words struck through are deleted; Last Revised: May 29,2014 Words underlined are added Exhibit "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 3 of 8 C. Development Density A maximum of €€ 33 dwelling units shall be constructed within the RPUD, per the Transportation Concurrency Management Ara (TCMA) bonus density provisions set forth in Exhibit F, Section 5. The gross project area is 11.3 ±acres and the residential density maximum shall be 5.84 2_9 units per acre. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words struck gh are deleted; Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added Exhibit "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NAPLES VIEW RPUD Development of the Naples View RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district shall apply. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Naples View RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PERMITTED USES AND Single Family Zero Lot Two Towohome Recreation STANDARDS Detached Line Family Doplem Min. Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1,400 SF N/A Min. Lot Width 50' 40' 35= 1-6= N/A SETBACKS Front 12113) 15' 15' 46- 1-S- 20' Side 5' 5'/0' 5'/0' 5'/0' 20' Rear(Principal) 15' 10' 10'- 4$ 10' Rear(Accessory) 0' 0' 0 0'- 0' Water body 20' 20' 2Q 20= 20' Airport Pulling Rd. 25' 25' 2 26= 25' Min. Distance Between 10' 10'/0' 10'/0' 10'/0'f Sum of'A BH Principal Structures Max. Building Height Zoned 35' 35' 35= 35- 35' Actual 40' 40' 40L 40- 40' No. of Stories 2 2 2 2 2 (1)Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 SF for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 SF. J(�}Minimum lot width may be reduced by 25%for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. (2)1 ?The minimum 15'front yard setback may be reduced to 10'where the residence has a recessed,side entry, or rear entry garage. In no case shall there be less than a clear area of 23 feet between the back of the sidewalk and the face of the garage door for front entry garages. 1314}For corner lots, only one(1)front yard setback shall be required.The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10' setback. (5)Distance between buildings may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0'where attached garages are provided, and a 10' minimum, if detached. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words struck through are deleted; Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added Exhibit "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT C RPUD MASTER PLAN ,!:1265-07 Naples View(CAONI Cro00W016'Mn9s-EA,Ib 4N28S07-04 MCP1Curen1 ReNt25507E0401-8911.9w9 4/962014 9:19:37 AM / -- - m 0 4 AIRPORT PULLING ROAD o -o O -0 —�m{-----C- 200'R-O.W. z o o S O 29 m r 'K0 m fn 73 v C D c m 7n cn Z m z °c °- < __ --- O N GI N m z C ---- '----- AIRPORT ROCANAL `, - El z Z m m m m I 1 . Z 0 Z O 0 I mO I G1 w � O I a ( /, p I � � m 0 0 m Z m0 pro 4�� i mo C C m° v-I b ■ F).5 m `tom m m I I = 0 �� N / A I co r I co II or- _._, rn 4. D K _ �0 I , O y NNp m C N. tt 1, 0 S :-§ + i Z I MZ0 ^, A 8 > I c�°b m I P m Dog N b1 i4- H- -I J pp rDr 0 o m m �n w y m it o _ D c�i z R.O.W. •• m -1 m Z pC o D > e n D n m 7n n O o 8 r� m O I I -< Q PI 9 b'• m 0 , m T 6' -i (n A (J N -' ° C m --. m ZZZ �_ Z , OZ IT m Om ; t = o -,xvm _0 m o0 I!! 7 �03 c.773 <-10 KSE' Z 9 0 T rzZ . og. m �Z§ 5,5_ O I ---III m° m C I Po z] a�? no �m �n °m EA z z x° m z z (I) v r Dm ° O o DZm o co Z r Z. m v 9Hh fl l i l I 4 A co j A �I�1 1� i i ti ai,�I. �d if 7- o m >o c m o))J igl 0 1 r i r: Z �_ HO Z D y D goz !�y°m zC°°� zI ` �OO J , m m r .z r �r�ar. r 1- IMP Z SCALE: N.T.S. PLAN REVISIONS - — WALDROP Q 0429114 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS NAPLES VIEW \l ENGINEERING ! CLIENT:6900 AIRPORT PULLING,LLC. `� / «� PUD MASTER PLAN .[IMAM"'•••ZI•• EXHIBIT"C" MN Pall MILK LIM-14111teld 201.TA IM/11,FL MILLI Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words struck through are deleted; Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added Exhibit "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC NAPLES VIEW RPUD Deviation 1: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.0 which requires a 15-foot wide Type "B" buffer where proposed residential uses abut existing commercial uses, to allow for a 10-foot wide Type "B" buffer where the property abuts the commercial use to the north. Deviation No. 2: Deviation from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height,to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height, subject to approval under temporary sign permit procedures in the LDC.The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. Deviation No. 3: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01, which requires a minimum width of 60 feet for cul-de-sac and local street rights-of-way, to allow for a minimum 45-foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. Deviation 4: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow the dead end street shown on the RPUD Master Plan. Deviation 5: Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum wall height of six (6) feet in residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum height of eight (8) feet for a combination wall and berm along the property lines. Deviation 6: Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground or wall signs up to 8 feet in height per entrance to the development, to allow one (1) wall-mounted boundary marker sign at the southern property corner fronting along Airport Pulling Road, in addition to the two (2) permissible project entry signs. The Boundary marker sign is limited to the community name and logo, and will not exceed 16 square feet, or a height or length greater than the wall upon which it is placed. Deviation 7: Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2)ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet,to allow for two (2) ground or wall signs at the project entrance with a combined sign area of 80 s.f. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words str-Ekek-thr-eugh are deleted; Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added Exhibit "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS NAPLES VIEW RPUD 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the general development commitments for the project. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this the PUD approval amendment dated July 7,2014,the Managing Entity is Naples View, LLC 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. UTILITIES 2.1 The project shall connect to the Collier County Water Sewer District(CCWSD) potable water system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.2 The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.3 The project shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.4 Should the Collier County Water Sewer District determine that it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the project; the Developer shall either construct interim potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities, or shall postpone development until such time as the Collier County Water- Sewer District service capacity is available to service the project. Any interim facilities constructed by the Developer shall be constructed to Collier County Utilities Division Standards, and shall be dismantled, at the Developer's expense, upon connection to the Collier County Water-Sewer District facilities. Whether potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities are provided on-site or off-site, the Developer shall demonstrate to Collier County that adequate capacity is available at the time of final utilities plan submittal. 2.5 All customers shall be customers of the CCWSD. 3. TRANSPORTATION A. The project shall maintain a minimum of 100' throat distance between the Airport Pulling right-of-way and the face of the entrance gates. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words struck through are deleted; Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added Exhibit "A" to HEX No. 2014-15 Page 8 of 8 B. The developer shall pay a proportionate fair share for improvements to the Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Pulling Road intersection. The proportionate fair share of the project's impacts to the intersection shall be determined at the time of construction plan approval based upon the project's trips as percentage of capacity improvements for the turning/through movements utilized by this site. Payment shall be made to Collier County within 90 days of the County's request. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL No preservation area is required as all existing, on-site vegetation is exotic. The RPUD shall be developed with up to 66 units per Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) bonus density, as defined in Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The developer shall provide the two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) criteria as follows: 1. Provide vehicular access to the future mixed use subdistrict to the north as shown on the PUD Master Plan, in the form of a non exclusive access easement to the adjacent property owner/developer to the North, conveyed prior to issuance of the first building permit. interconnection to the future mixed use subdistrict to the north shown on the PUD Master Plan. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words struck through are deleted; Last Revised: May 29,2014 Words underlined are added 14A* Friday,June 6,2014 )) NAPLES DAILY NEWS PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX)at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,June 26th,2014,in the Hearing Examiner's Meeting Room, at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, FL, 34104 to consider: PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000504 — 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC is requesting an insubstantial change to the Naples View RPUD, Ordinance No. 2012-22, to remove townhouse dwelling units and two-family,duplex dwelling units from the list of permitted uses; reduce the maximum development density from 66 to 33 dwelling units;amend the Master Plan to reflect changes to dwelling unit density and access to adjacent property; add new LDC deviations relating to boundary marker signs and project entrance ground or wall signs; change the name of the PUD Managing Entity;and delete development commitments relating to the Transportation Concurrency Management density bonus and requirements for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access and facilities. The subject property is located on the east side of Airport Pulling Rd, south of Orange Blossom Dr., in Section 1,Township 49 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida,consisting of 11.32±acres. MARKER LAKE FOUNTAIN < VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD VILLAS I �II PARK VINEYARDS 0 WALGREENS BRIGHTON (DRI) GARDENS MONTEREY CITRUS Z VINEYARDS EMERALD LAKES GARDENS 1 (DR ) CHANGE 6 2 aAE !/ . M(S) - SVzaAH us H SAA PROJECT SLEEPY \ M' LONGVIEW CENTER FIRST LOCATION HOLLOW — BAPTIST AM,D5AN SUNSHINE LLUB LONE CHURCH tUCE BEAR-- OAK V.F.W. CREEK (S) KEYSTONE PLAC Q WILLOW TOP HAT MANCHESTER O PARK AUTO SQUARE 't9 Z K SCHOOL 11 PINE AIR 3 U OF NAPLES 7 LAKES a PARK 12 (0121) H CENTRAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES NORTH CYPRESS UNIT 35 / SUMMER%IND GLEN I-71 f I All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. All materials used in presentation before the Hearing Examiner will become a permanent part of the record. Copies of staff report are available one week prior to the hearing. The file can be reviewed at the Collier County Growth Management Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL. The Hearing Examiner's decision becomes final on the date rendered. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Hearing Examiner with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to partici- pate in this proceeding,you are entitled, at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101, Naples, Florida 34112-5356, (239)252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Mark Strain, Chief Hearing Examiner Collier County, Florida EXHIBIT No.231130879 ____ June 6.2014 A a�2QIJ C AGENDA ITEM 4-B Co er County MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION HEARING DATE: JUNE 26,2014 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20140000504,NAPLES VIEW PUD PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: 6900 Airport Pulling LLC Alexis Crcspo,AICP c/o William Depietri Waldrop Engineering, P.A. 259 Turnpike Road, #100 28100 Bonita Grande Dr, #305 Southborough, MA 01772 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Hearing Examiner approve an insubstantial amendment to the Naples View PUD to allow the following change: • Exhibit A—List of Permitted Uses • Combine"R1"and"R2"Residential Tracts into a single"Residential Tract"category. • Remove two—family and townhouse dwelling units from the schedule of uses. • Add reference to the Hearing Examiner process for determining comparable uses. • Modify Development Density statement to reduce density from 66 dwelling units (5.84 du/acre)to 33 dwelling units(2.9 du/acre). Exhibit B—Development Standards • Remove Two-Family and Townhome column from development standards table Exhibit C—RPUD Master Plan • Remove"Vehicular/Bicycle/Pedestrian Linkage to Future PUD"label and arrows. • Remove reference to"R1"and"R2"tracts and re-label as"Residential Tract" • Revise Land Use Summary Table to reflect reduced unit count and density. Naples View PUD, PDI-PL20140000504 § EXHIBIT Page 1 of 6 June 26,2014 Hearing Examiner Last Revised: May 5,2014 M k/ 1 cJ Exhibit E—List of Requested Deviations from LDC • Add New Deviation 6 to allow one (1) boundary marker sign at the southern property corner fronting on Airport Pulling Road, in addition to residential entrance signs. • Add New Deviation 7 to allow 80 square feet of combined entry signage. Exhibit F—PUD Commitments • Modify Managing Entity to reflect current owner, 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC. • Remove Commitment 5 regarding bonus density criteria. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 11.3+ acres, is located on the east side of Airport-Pulling Road, approximately 800 feet south of the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road (County Road 31) and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See axial map below and location map on the following page) r � , ♦ tffi 7t E il . P . . _.- �. k r ,r.# * 4?Rey 1 'ExLT . , � ;, .:� �. _ 411 r ', 7 Subject r t • a i . , ._Property ,, , ."0`4T1. f r irlia sly' - - _ r�,�+.., r 6� r .. m.�. �" r i a t 1 tt -r -.. tr 41k:rs a .„, -., . ......,..-- _ .. ria,,,;;......ii= , ' ti.;------,----:„is..a osiA e .91- -It iv..-_80ft VI 4 Aerial Photo(subject site depiction is approximate) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF MAP AND TEXT CHANGES: The Naples View PUD was originally rezoned to PUD on June 26, 2012, in Ordinance Number 2012- 22, allowing development of up to 66 dwelling units on the subject 11+ acres. The site was divided into R1 and R2 tracts with the R1 tract containing single-family detached, zero lot line and two- family, duplex dwelling units and the R2 tract to contain townhouse units for a gross density of 5.84 units per acre. The R2 uses were to be developed along the Airport Road corridor rather than ^ adjacent to the Walden Oaks subdivision to the east. As part of that approval the applicant was Naples View PUD,PDI-PL20140000504 Page 2 of 6 June 26,2014 Hearing Examiner Last Revised: May 5,2014 -- T_ YYM....... ---•. � IIIMMIl 25 it 1.02 Mt• ■saw . A ‘1:‘ u41001 nr wall*wows uw mwf �r 1 on.-\ VET. ACa3 iJU I 'r Y Y2i Aly' YYR YYC. Ia �» g I -, n _i5 .. .sse s.s m..a s msY tart■ IOW\ ` .u..� errs ua Imam* MO ...ow i, Y.R. . -M�!_.r i am, i ., .or ...3,7...........j.-----ii__,„ 56 =Mil M ESSE MK $ 4 Ym. r. 1 li -''�- I LOCATION ,d. eLCYIr fT .41. '. '' c"--.3 OPIIIIWO NNW b.0210./n WIN. aoYe. Yml _ _ • iiiiiiifii 1M111111uummmi A .Y ...PM j I YL/PWAN q) , ' rums ucL Y.YD Yn w M 4 �� Y ii 410111WIP I M•11 I 410 ad= 11•01:11". =". . lir i i. 1 CM 1144P111111111111.11111110.. _rim--ji _� 1 x rausi+•rws - - Y". V` ■y .s a; nn - . sosa at 52.e• .ru.r. . ... sore .i. iC ; sm. PAP.IY.Y I • rss - t:, wan so I:i2 u+wwwvx. ! � � �.. , �,r ILV OW, F yr q ,. .,.R�>~m i Caa s Om f ,.wt,s,so fr 111 ON,WS 71, LT n+.oY ar s I .;.,I ! .unY�w '" t +I pia...." ( 1. >• i1 r �It_ NP,-Lm S�Y.Y Me Wm i-- MY eN• 4fikPLAA *ill ...8 .. - .. LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP PETITION POI-PL-2014-504 1 • n 11 1. FLU ORANGE BLOSSOM MIXED USE SUBDISTRIC' FLU:URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT Z t 1 ZONING:PUD ZONING:PUD W 2 i EXISTING L AND I LSE-RETAIL.T'LANT NURSERY EXISTING LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(WALDEN OAKS) 2 ; II 10.TYPE"A'BUFFER OR N 0 W -1 1 -!0 TYPE 6 BUFFER ;-OPTIONAL C _I5 TYPE-12 BUFFER DEPENDENT I I t FENCE!WALL f ON PRODUCT TYPE. II R.O.W. ��10 TYPE'A'BUFFER \ �p� _—__—__—_____-__-_.-__-__-__-__—._'_ ,I OR 15'TYPE'B' BUFFER DEPENDENT D �'REOREATKYN RESIDENTIAI TRACT r R.O.W.LINE FACIJTV � ON PRODUCT TYPE, tA '1 O RESIDENTIAL TRACT (TYP.) ,\_`_ L.! 1 owl __- ''—__� K FLU -20'L M,E, RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESIDENTIAL • f SUBDISTRICT ZONING: ', R.O.W. I /TRACT LINE PUD !,� XI TYPE V� -,`•-.____T _ 4P ! / ITYP.) I EX(STING LAND USE: 3 BUFFER OPTIONAL `R.O.W.LINE n I MULTI-FAMILY •-1 a RECREATION ITYP.) I RESIDENTIAL(WALDEN a 5 FACILITI RESIDENTIAL TRACT I LAKE I� OAKS) > v!I, RESIDENTIAL OpTIryAI �� C/� Q i=m TRACT LINE RECREATI0N `-OPTIONAL 8' (,j,� a.<= OPTIONAL (TYP.) FACAITY 'I FENCE'WALL IF FENCE I — 11 a <5" OPTIONAL 8' 15 TYPE'B'BUFFER FENCE/WALL FLU:URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT W ZONING:P1.10 EXISTING LAND USE:R.C.W.AND PRIVATE AMENITY FACILITY(WALDEN OAKS) g CJ S I 1 1T_.. T WORN A >\IIFRKIIIKFAi,I Kf 1417 a e. LAND USE SUMMARY N t CATEGORY ACREAGE / "s, PROJECT 1 i TOTAL ACREAGE GENERAL NOTES LOCATION 1 A IMPERVIOUS 4.5; 40% ORANGE BL •SOM ORM1F i BUILDING 3.3* 29% 1 THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE " is AND IS 9UB,ECT TO MODIFICATIONS AT "i '° z PAVEMENT(SIDEWALK 1.2; 11% TIME OF AGENCY PERMITTING _ C PERVIOUS(OPEN SPACE/ E.8; BOX Z.1 2. ALL ACREAGE IS APPROXIMATE AND +1 — OPEN SPACE 4A t 19% SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME E ,4 w LAKE 2.2; 19'. OF PPL OR SOP APPROVAL. - r. d S L.M.E.=LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT __ IQ § TOTAL AREA 11.31 100% 4. NO PRESERVATION IS RECWRED AS ALL n 'r z T ON-SITE VEGETATION S EXOTIC. _ G CURRENT ZONING RESIDENTIAL PUD 5. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES MAY ONLY BE LOCATED IN AREAS SHOWN ON THE PUD R PINE RIDGE ROAD, 1 J 3 PROPOSED ZONING RESIDENTIAL PUD MASTER PLAN RECREATIONAL - i J fa FACILITIES ARE OPTIONAL AND ARE NOT $!+ DENSITY MAX 33 UNITS/11.30AC-2.9OUYAC ` REQUIRED, , - - / PROM(I LO4A1 ION MAI' T1 MIMI rr e i still: required to provide an interconnection to the north as required by the Transportatio concurrency Management Area (TCMA) to achieve the requested bonus density (5.84 units per acre instead of 3 units per acre). As noted above the current PDI request seeks to remove the two-family, duplex dwelling units and townhouse use and reduce the development to 33 dwelling units. The applicant also wishes to remove the interconnection requirement along the project's north property line based upon the request to reduce density to 3 units per acre. Two deviations are being added addressing signs. ANALYSIS: Section 10.02.13.E.1 and 2 of the Land Development Code sets forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each criterion of 10.02.13.E.I have been listed as follows: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development(PUD)? No,there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development. The applicant is reducing the number of units and the density. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such,or five(5)acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space),or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No, the proposed amendment will not increase the size of institutional, commercial, industrial uses since the PUD does not allow those uses. The governing ordinance allows residential and associated accessory uses. No additional uses are being requested; the applicant is seeking to remove uses. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? There are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. Naples View PUD, PDI-PL20140000504 Page 3 of 6 June 26,2014 Hearing Examiner Last Revised: May 5,2014 f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular _ traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No, as noted above, the proposed change will not create any additional vehicular generated trips. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention,or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed change to the Master Plan Site should not increase stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge. It is assumed that reducing the number of units and removing the multi-family will cause a reduction. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. The proposed change to remove the multi-family units and reduce the overall number of units should make the project more compatible with the adjacent Walden Oaks community. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? _ No, this modification is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. However, in a review memo dated May 20, 2014, Comprehensive Planning Staff offered the following comments in reference to the Futuer Land Use Element (FLUE) Policies quoted below [FLUE relevant policies are stated below(in italics); each policy is followed by staff analysis(in bold)). Policy 7.3 --All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. (The subject site is a small infill property with limited interconnection/access potential to neighboring properties. Properties to the east and south are fully developed but there is the ability to provide an interconnection to the approved mixed use project to the north (Longview Center PUD) – and such interconnection is presently approved in the existing Naples View PUD. The applicant is proposing to remove both the vehicular and bike/pedestrian interconnections to the north that this Policy 7.3 encourages. Staff agrees, in part,with the applicant's explanation of possible negative impacts to the subject site if the vehicular interconnection is retained. Further, staff acknowledges the small size of this project (33 units), thus limited benefit of vehicular or bike/ped interconnections. Staff disagrees that the existing sidewalk along the east side of Airport-Pulling Road,which is less than 150 feet from the bike/ped interconnection shown on the existing PUD Master Plan, negates the need for such an interconnection. There is an intervening canal and — no access from Airport-Pulling Road into Longview Center, thus a resident of Naples Naples View PUD, PDI-PL20140000504 Page 4 of 6 June 26,2014 Hearing Examiner Last Revised: May 5,2014 view would have to walk to the project entrance, north on the Airport-Pulling Road sidewalk, east on the Orange Blossom Road sidewalk to the Longview Center entrance. The distance between the two project entrances alone is ±'/4 mile, thus a round trip just between entrances would be f'/2 mile; when the additional distances are added to walk within each development to reach the respective entrances, the round trip exceeds '/2 mile. Despite the small size of the development, staff sees some value in having a bike/ped interconnection.) Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities. common open spaces. civic.facilities and a range of housing prices and types. (The small size of the site limits design flexibility and ability to provide different neighborhoods with different unit types and prices, but both single family and two-family dwellings are proposed. Recreational facilities are allowed and open space will be provided per LDC requirements. As no LDC deviation is requested, sidewalks will be required per the LDC. Adding to the walkability of the community are pedestrian interconnections with neighboring projects; please see above discussion.) Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUD insubstantial change (amendment) petition to be consistent with the FLUE. However, staff encourages the applicant to retain the bike/pedestrian interconnection to the north. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. The project is not a DRI. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? Based upon the analysis provide above, the proposed changes are not deemed to he substantial. FINDINGS OF FACT: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.E.2 also requires an evaluation of the findings and criteria used for the original PUD application. The staff report for the original rezone petition, PUDZ-PL20110001519. contained the PUD and Rezoning Findings from LDC Subsection I0.02.13.B.5 and 10.02.08.F. respectively. This amendment does not negatively impact any of those findings. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report on May 29, 2014. Naples View PUD, PDI-PL20140000504 Page 5 of 6 June 26,2014 Hearing Examiner Last Revised: May 5,2014 1 i STAFF RECOMMENDATION: — Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Naples View PUD, PDI- PL20140000504. PREPARED BY: e'l 5/a?-bratCdt/ilt) KAY E�LEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DA E DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWED BY: 1 1?c,-- 1 J r RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING S ',2 P- 'y MIKE BOSI, AICP, D CTOR DATE I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING Naples View PUD,PDI-PL20140000504 Page 6 of 6 June 26,2014 Hearing Examiner Last Revised: May 5,2014 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES NAPLES VIEW RPUD PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses and Structures: "R1 Residential Tracts 1. Single-family detached dwelling units 2. Zero lot line units 3. 4. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools,tennis courts, volleyball courts,fishing docks,walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings,and basketball/shuffle board courts. ., '} Zero lot line. nits beams Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals and Hearing Examiner pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports,garages,and utility buildings. 2. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, fishing docks, walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 4. Entry Gates&Gatehouse. 5. Essential services,including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Water management facilities. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code(LDC). Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words strums are deleted; Page 1 of 7 Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added C. Development Density A maximum of 66 33 dwelling units shall be constructed within the RPUD, gross project area is 11.3 ±acres and the residential density maximum shall be"i.84 2_9 units per acre. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words ststc-k-through are deleted; Page 2 of 7 Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NAPLES VIEW RPUD Development of the Naples View RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards,then the provisions of the most similar district shall apply. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Naples View RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. 1 TABLE 1 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — j PERMITTED USES AND Single Family Zero Lot Twe Tewwbm ee Recreation l STANDARDS Detached Line Family, Deptem Min.Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1.741004F N/A I Min.Lot Width 50' 40' 3S' 461 N/A SETBACKS — Front 2 s 15' 15' I5= 20' Side 5' 510' 548= 540_, 20' Rear(Principal) 15' 10' i& 40= 10' Rear(Accessory) 0' 0' 0 01 0' Water body 20' 20' 2o= 29= 20' Airport Pulling Rd. 25' 25' ZS= 26= 25' Min.Distance Between 10' 10'/0' 40,4e 40,404 Sum of BH Principal Structures Max.Building Height Zoned 35' 35' 35L 35= 35' Actual 40' 40' 4A= 40= 40' No.of Stories 2 2 2 2 2 (.(•24 Minimum lot width may be reduced by 25%for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. (2)434The minimum 15'front yard setback may be reduced to 10'where the residence has a recessed,side entry,or rear entry garage. In no case shall there be less than a clear area of 23 feet between the back of the sidewalk and the face of the garage door for front entry garages. j.314-iFor corner lots,only one(1)front yard setback shall be required.The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10'setback. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words str-v441afetigh are deleted; Page 3 of 7 Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added a I J1 1 N �� RL•L PWGE BLOSSOM IIOfED USE BLIBDIBIRICT ELL!URBAN RE810ENTYL&JBDBRRCT i _W ZONLNG:PlC COIN&PIM jy 2 a NAMING LAIC LSE'RETAIL PLANT NURSERY corm IMO LSE:MOLE EMILY RESIDENTIAL(WALLLEN ON1B) J !i a NNO( 111 10',PPE•A•BUFFER OR r 1Q TYPE F SIPPER OPTIONAL B ...t5 TVPE'S BIA}E1108lEMOENf I �FEFICEIYMIl I `PROOIICT TYPE. f .0 , ' f __ R.O.W. ( -W TYPE•A'EIfiPFA —��! fil 01 r_—______.________ f_.___.. _ 'I BUFFER TYPE DE \ BUFFER OLICT TYPE �~ ,' IB�IIML me/St RAW.LBE� \ +� ON PRODUOT'YPE. �s FLU a 8!n I ^._fi Y� URBAN aEBOE1+rPI , BUBDIETHf.D A7/11M0: Z .q maw. /~ ` mama LAND use 3 a bilk) 1E 1 "Re 7FFAMOL N 4 Z ,R� Nf1CO1TV1l T i lMt d'�y) > N v d ) ` TRACT Ll1E 1�- L�,',�,�,� OPTIONAL r (Y� = o f ( nro) I ■. ' , FENCE/WALL a i t y ` WALL ` _.. j 2 A n 2 OPTIONAL I 1 12 TYPE r SUPPER •7 $ FENCE I WALL .- O (z- 4 FLU LA18AN I11111101301AL SUBOIBTRICT c CL 10RN0:PW CC EIOATINO LAND USE R_O.W.N8]PRIVATE AMENRY FACILITY(WAXEN ONO) U - l ui 0 ° 3 co mi. - PIPAPIPIPIPRAM1 1x11 a LAND USE SUMMARY , 1 �, • CATEGORY AOEA(IE PERCENTAGE OF rt.::A ! JAYI'+ 4 rorALncT1EAOE r GENERAL NOTES 1 L••. uPecvlow ae ap11 BUILDING 82! 78E t ¶IS PLAN 810ONCEaT1ALIN NATI)IE '1.. _ PAVEMENTBIDEWAUL 12! 11% AIOMMMlCT TO MODIFICATIONS AT . TIME OF AGCY PETO/T TINT. PERVIOUS(OPEN SPACE) B)! 00% I. AU.ACREAGE LS APPRO./AWE AND _ { e SUBJECT TO MOD6ICATIDN AT THE TIME —. _ z .+ LANE SPACE I1! 1811 OF PPL OR SOP ADPiIOVAL ...----_... 7 i O 3. L M.F.•RARE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ;--�� ,ai e TOTAL AREA 112! 10011 4 NO PRESERVATION IS REOL8RED AB ALL n !• bb O 0 ON-SITE VEGETATION IS EXOTIC. > CURRENT mI8I8i RESIDENTIAL AJO 6 RELAEAT ORAL FACAJTES MAY ONLY BE -- _1. LOCATED IN AREAS KNOWN ON TM PUD 4•.;I... I( 0 ,. 11 PIgPOBBD 1018!16 RI�YITVK PLC MASTER PLAN.RECREATIONAL • • a N FAC1'!ES ARE OP1IOFAI AND ARE NOT t,• I a. 5 li 1: `DENNTY MAX Xi LWWI 1.13 AC•AS OWAO, A. REOUREC 3 PR(V NCI LOCATION MAP rr>OI�Mye J N m M 2 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC NAPLES VIEW RPUD Deviation 1: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.0 which requires a 15-foot wide Type "B" buffer where proposed residential uses abut existing commercial uses, to allow for a 10-foot wide Type "B" buffer where the property abuts the commercial use to the north. Deviation No. 2: Deviation from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height,to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height, subject to approval under temporary sign permit procedures in the LDC.The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. Deviation No. 3: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01, which requires a minimum width of 60 feet for cul-de-sac and local street rights-of-way, to allow for a minimum 45-foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. Deviation 4: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.1 which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow the dead end street shown on the RPUD Master Plan. Deviation 5: Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum wall height of six (6) feet in residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum height of eight (8) feet for a combination wall and berm along the property lines. Deviation 6: Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.02.6.6, which permits two (2)ground or wall signs up to 8 feet in height per entrance to the development, to allow one (1) wall-mounted boundary marker sign at the southern property corner fronting along Airport Pulling Road, in addition to the two (2) permissible project entry signs. The Boundary marker sign is limited to the community name and logo, and will not exceed 16 square feet, or a height or length greater than the wall upon which it is placed. Deviation 7: Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b,which permits two (2)ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet,to allow for two(2)ground or wall signs at the project entrance with a combined sign area of 80 s.f. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words strK-4 eugh are deleted; Page 5 of 7 Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS NAPLES VIEW RPUD 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the general development commitments for the project. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this the PUD appreval-amendment dated 2014, the Managing Entity is Maple` View, "C- 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. UTILITIES 2.1 The project shall connect to the Collier County Water Sewer District(CCWSD) potable water system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.2 The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.3 The project shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.4 Should the Collier County Water Sewer District determine that it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the project; the Developer shall either construct interim potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities, or shall postpone development until such time as the Collier County Water- Sewer District service capacity is available to service the project. Any interim facilities constructed by the Developer shall be constructed to Collier County Utilities Division Standards, and shall be dismantled, at the Developer's expense, upon connection to the Collier County Water-Sewer District facilities. Whether potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities are provided on-site or off-site, the Developer shall demonstrate to Collier County that adequate capacity is available at the time of final utilities plan submittal. 2.5 All customers shall be customers of the CCWSD. 3. TRANSPORTATION A. The project shall maintain a minimum of 100' throat distance between the Airport Pulling right-of-way and the face of the entrance gates. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words str-u€4-through are deleted; Page 6 of 7 Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added B. The developer shall pay a proportionate fair share for improvements to the Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Pulling Road intersection. The proportionate fair share of the project's impacts to the intersection shall be determined at the time of construction plan approval based upon the project's trips as percentage of capacity improvements for the turning/through movements utilized by this site. Payment shall be made to Collier County within 90 days of the County's request. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL No preservation area is required as all existing,on-site vegetation is exotic. 5.—PLANNING • . . . . Wan- Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Words struck-through are deleted; Page 7 of 7 Last Revised:May 29,2014 Words underlined are added Naples View RPUD—Insubstantial Change COVER LETTER/DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST IfI WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 28100 RONRA GRANDE DR. #305 BON(TA SPRINGS,FL 34135 P:239.405.7777 __ F:239-405-7899 March 31, 2014 REVISED April 30, 2014 Ms. Kay Deselem, AICP Zoning & Land Development Review Department Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change (PDI) PDI-PL20140000504 Dear Ms. Deselem: Enclosed for your review is the Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regards to the Naples View RPUD ("Property"), an 11+/- acre project located at 6900 Airport Road N. in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. The Property is within Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, and is designated within the Urban Residential Subdistrict per the Collier County Future Land Use Map. _ BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The Property was historically utilized as a retail tree nursery, known as Wizzard Lake Nursery, which was relocated a number of years ago. Currently, the Property is vacant and contains a 2.4+/-acre pond and remnants of the former tree nursery. In 2012, the Property was rezoned from Rural Agriculture (A) to Residential Planned Unit Development pursuant to Ordinance 12-22 to allow for a maximum of 66 dwelling units, accessory uses and associated infrastructure. The approval allowed for bonus density under the Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) Bonus, defined in Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element. Specifically, the Applicant committed to provide the two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) criteria per Commitment 5 of the PUD Document as follows: "1. Provide vehicular access to the future mixed use subdistrict to the north as shown on the PUD Master Plan, in the form of a non-exclusive access easement to the adjacent property owner/developer to the North, conveyed prior to issuance of the first building permit." 2. Provide pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project and a bicycle/pedestrian interconnection to the future mixed use district to the north shown on the PUD Master Plan." Naples View PDI—PL2014-0504 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 1 of 7 REQUEST: 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC ("Applicant") is requesting approval to: 1) eliminate the requirement for a vehicular/pedestrian interconnection to the property to the north; 2) reduce the unit count to 33 dwelling units; and 3) eliminate townhouse dwelling types from the schedule of uses, and consolidate the uses into a single residential category; 4) modify two (2) approved deviations regarding temporary signage and wall height; and 5) add two new (2) deviations regarding residential entry signage. Please refer to the attached Deviation Justification Narrative for detailed descriptions of these requests. The Property is located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict, as well as the Traffic Congestion Area. Therefore, the base density of three (3) du/acre, or thirty-three (33) dwelling units complies with the Growth Management Plan. The proposed modifications to the PUD will not impact the project's consistency with all applicable goals, objectives and policies within the GMP. COMPATIBILITY: In terms of adjacent uses, the Walden Oaks community abuts the property to the south, east, and a portion of the northern property line; a retail plant nursery abuts the property to north; and the Airport Road canal and Airport Pulling Road right-of-way abut the property to the west. The request will not impact the perimeter buffers, which will continue to comply with the LDC requirements, except where a deviation has been approved. No additional deviations to buffer requirements are proposed through this application. The request will reduce the project's density, which will positively impact the Walden Oaks community. Additionally, the proposed use and density of the Naples View project is being reduced to a gated, single-family community with a maximum density of 2.9 du/acre, or 33 units. As such, the project is no longer compatible with the intended uses and allowable intensity/density permitted within the Orange Blossom Mixed Use District to the north (Please also refer to the GMP analysis below). Pedestrian connections between neighboring uses are addressed via the existing sidewalk on Airport Pulling Road. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE: As noted above, The Property is located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict and the Traffic Congestion Area, which allows for a maximum base density of 3 du/acre and a variety of residential uses. The proposed PDI will allow for a maximum density of 2.9 du/acre and dwelling units limited to single-family detached and zero lot line, in compliance with the underlying Future Land Use. At the time of the original PUD rezoning, the Applicant and Owner (Naples View, LLC) intended to develop the Property with higher density residential uses under the bonus density provisions of the Growth Management Plan. Initially, the application proposed multi-family dwelling types to be permitted throughout the project (in addition to single-family, two-family and townhomes) in order to realize the maximum density of 6 du/acre, or 66 dwelling units. Without the approval for higher density dwelling types the bonus density could not be achieved due to the site's constraints. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Cover Letter Page 2 of 7 Through the PUD review process it became known that Walden Oaks to the east and south were strongly opposed to higher density product types, specifically multi-family dwellings (see NIM Meeting Minutes attached as Exhibit "A"). In order to demonstrate cooperation and compromise with the Walden Oaks community, the Applicant removed multi-family dwellings from the list of permitted uses in the PUD Document, and limited the townhome dwelling type to only the western portion of the project closest to Airport Pulling Road, and furthest away from existing single-family dwellings within Walden Oaks. The result of these limitations is that the maximum density of 66 du/acre, attained through bonus density provisions, could not be constructed. The Property was acquired by 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC in March 2014. The new owner has revised the development program to allow for the development of the Property as a gated, low-density single-family community. This development program is based upon current market demand for new inventory within a single-family gated community in close proximity to schools, entertainment, beaches and other attractants in western Collier County. The change to the development program resulted in the evaluation of the project's compatibility with the Orange Blossom Mixed Use District to the north, specifically in regards to a pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular interconnection between the properties. The following factors were evaluated by the Applicant, resulting in the current request to omit the interconnection between the Naples View PUD and the Orange Blossom Mixed Use District to the north: 1) Intensity of the Mixed Use District The Longview Center Planned Unit Development sets forth a maximum of 73,500 SF of commercial retail uses and 70,000 square feet of office uses in accordance with the GMP Policies guiding development of the Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict. The residential component is limited to 15 multi-family dwelling units. While this PUD has sunsetted and will require further Board action prior to development, this approval exemplifies the anticipated build-out of the project with high intensity commercial uses, which could include drive-thrus and other non-residential uses that contribute to noise, light and vehicular trip generation. 2) Proposed Naples View Density As noted above, the original owner's intent was to develop the project with higher density uses that could be compatibly integrated with the neighboring mixed-use district through the bicycle/pedestrian/vehicular interconnection. The interconnection was proffered to meet Growth Management Plan bonus density provisions in order to achieve 66 du/acre. Staff did not opine during the PUD review process that the interconnection was a requirement of the project if developed with the base density of 3 du/acre. The current Owner/Applicant is limiting development of the Property to 2.9 du/acre, or 33 units, in order to develop the property solely with single-family uses. The community will be gated to provide a level of security that is common to many residential developments across Collier County. The proposed low-density use is entirely compatible with the intent of the Urban Residential .- Subdistrict, and is consistent with the permitted base density; however vehicular interconnection Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Cover Letter Page 3 of 7 between a single-family gated community and an intense mixed-use district will result in incompatibility issues due to the anticipated number of trips entering and exiting the residential community to gain access to the mixed-use node. To be clear, the developments themselves are not incompatible in that the required landscape buffers and proposed wall provide screening and mitigation. The incompatibility concern is raised by vehicles using the entrance to the proposed residential community as a "cut through" to a commercial development containing 140K square feet of retail and office uses. When bonus density was proffered, it was anticipated that the Naples View project would achieve a higher density build-out that would warrant closer integration with the mixed-use subdistrict. The removal of the bonus density through this PDI application concurrently with the removal of the interconnection recognizes that lower density residential requires additional design sensitivity when located near a mixed-use activity center, particularly in regards to the flow of traffic between the sites. Policy 7.3 of the Growth Management Plan states the following, "All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type." The policy specifically states that interconnections are "encouraged", and acknowledges that interconnections are not possible between all types of development due to differing uses, location of environmentally sensitive lands, or other issues. LDC Section 4.04.02.B.3 sets forth criteria where interconnections between developments may be prohibited. One of the specific criteria is when "the abutting use is found to be incompatible with the existing or proposed use". The Applicant respectfully submits based upon the proposed development program that requiring a vehicular interconnection between a high intensity mixed-use development and a single-family gated community will result in potential incompatibility and vehicular movements that that will negatively impact the Naples View project. ENVIRONMENTAL: Per the previous PUD approval it was determined that no state or federal listed species were observed on- site or within the Project's vicinity. Furthermore, the site does not contain any native vegetation, and is comprised wholly of abandoned nursery and stormwater management pond FLUCCS codes. The proposed Insubstantial Change has no impact to the site's environmental factors. INFRASTRUCTURE: The subject property will be accessed via the existing ingress/egress along Airport Pulling Road, as depicted on the RPUD Master Plan. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. was submitted with the original RPUD rezone application demonstrating the impact of 66 single-family dwelling units. The TIS demonstrated that Airport Pulling Road will have adequate capacity under the 2016 projected traffic conditions to service the project. The Applicant is proposing a decrease in density, which will result in a decrease to the project's trips generation and impact to surrounding roadways. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Cover Letter Page 4 of 7 Potable water and sanitary sewer for this project will be provided by Collier County Utilities (CCU) through existing infrastructure located along Airport Pulling Road. The Applicant is proposing a decrease in density, which will result in a decrease to the project's demand for utilities. JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC§10.02.13.E: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request proposes to substantially decrease the total number of dwelling units within the development. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space area. The RPUD does not contain native vegetation/preserve, and is entirely comprised of abandoned nursery, lake and exotic vegetation FLUCCS codes. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the RPUD does not permit nonresidential uses, and the proposed change does not request nonresidential uses. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will result in a decrease to the external impacts of the development based upon the lowered density, including traffic generation and impacts on public facilities. Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Cover Letter Page 5 of 7 f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will decrease the project's trip generation based upon the proposed reduction to density. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for storm water retention or increase storm water discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; No, the request does not impact abutting land uses, or modify any of the approved land uses, location of uses, or landscape buffers. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth Management Plan. As noted above, the request will reduce the density of the project to the standard base density permitted in the underlying Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Application also addresses the GMP's encouragement of interconnections, where possible. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or No, the RPUD is not located within a Development of Regional Impact. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13 Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Cover Letter Page 6 of 7 No, based upon the pre-application meeting with Staff held on March 26, 2014 the request is not deemed a substantial modification. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will serve to reduce the project's density and remove the interconnection to the north. The proposed deviations will allow for enhanced design flexibility to develop an infill community, while protecting public health, safety and welfare. The RPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) and will serve as an overall enhancement to the area. Per the Pre-Application Meeting Notes, the following items are enclosed for your review: 1. A check) in the amount of$2,425 for the application fees; 2. Fourteen (14) copies of the submittal cover letter detailing the purpose of the request; 3. Fourteen (14) copies of the completed PDI Application; 4. One (1) copy of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes; 5. Fourteen (14) copies of the current PUD Master Plan and one (1) reduced copy; 6. Fourteen (14) copies of the revised PUD Master Plan and one (1) reduced copy in strikethrough/underline format; 7. Fourteen (14) copies of the PUD document in strikethrough/underline format; 8. Fourteen (14) copies of Bullet List of PUD changes; 9. Three (3) copies of the boundary survey; 10. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the executed Affidavit of Authorization with list of parties in organization; 11. Three (3) copies of the Warranty Deed; 12. One (1) copies of the approved Addressing Checklist; 13. One (1) copies of the Location Map; 14. Fourteen (14) copies of the Deviation Narrative; and 15. Three (3) copies of the entire submittal documents on CDROM; Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 or alexisc@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. OCAqite Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Principal Planner Enclosures cc: William Depietri, 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC James Nulf, 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC Naples View RPUD—PL2014-0504 Cover Letter Page 7 of 7 Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 COMPLETED APPLICATION Colier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PM) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E&Code of Laws section 2-83—2-90 Ch.3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To he complelet(hy skiff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC do William Depietri Address: 259 Turnpike Road, #100 City: Southborough State: MA ZIP: 01772 Telephone: (503)357-8825 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: wdepietri©me.com Name of Agent: Alexis Crespo, AICP Firm: Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., #305 : Bonita Springs . FL 34135 city: ZIP: Telephone: (239) 405-7777 Cell: (239) 850-8525 Fax: (239) 405-7899 E-Mail Address: alexisc©waldropengineering.com DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? • Yes n No 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. n 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. 2/6/2014 Page 1 of 5 5Acoy COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239) 252-6358 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. I I 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) William Depietri, Managing Member 100% ownership DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: Naples View ORDINANCE NUMBER: 201 2-22 Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? [i[ Yes Li No If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? [l Yes [i[ No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or[l DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? [ f Yes 10 No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 2/6/2014 Page 2 of 5 Col er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST See Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements. This completed checklist is to be submitted with the application packet in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 0 n E Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 n ❑ Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes ❑ — II and why amendment is necessary — Detail of request © n n Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy 0 © n Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy n ❑ Revised Text and any exhibits Ill List identifying Owner&all parties of corporation 2 Fl U Affidavit of Authorization signed& notarized 2 Li - Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ ❑ _ Copy of 81/2 in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 [. U Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all [ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing,include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS: X PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI):$1,500.00 Pre-Application Meeting: o Planning and Zoning Fee-$500.00 x. Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center �� 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 342/. (/(-7 Applicant/Owner Signature Date 411144/1-1 D I 4,- ii lam Depietn Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 2/6/2014 Page 3 of 5 Naples View RPUD—Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES PL# OL'al —656(i Date: a J 71►4 Time: d _rr: ( ,41.00t1AL) Assigned Planner: ! `4 It-�'- (?V� I Project Name: N LE5 V Ektd �UL Applicant Name: f` I ` L f ( :)C Phone: 140 ~� f I r1 — Owner Name: Owner Address: - Phone: Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign in Sheet) Meeting Notes No r F CO U_-E c_T .D co LSE_CT -r'0 FoL.lo c ooa-(, ,aOC'X)O upV1 30.L3►41 ITT Pc N Nreirtv�(_-,`, 14p_i 6r1, ►til: f�c.,l7;al r,, t C�i.i ��tuff., \I e_x I_ �N Ens Co)% Al 1- put PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW: Comments should be forwarded to the Planner prior to the due date SCHOOL DISTRICT-Amy Taylor ►J/4 PARKS& REC-Vicky Ahmad N/A SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS pJ/A City of Naples-Robin Singer N/A DR/EM1 -EMER.MGMT-Jim Von Rinteln /J IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT N/A BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE N/4 UTILITIES ENGINEERING-Paulo Martins tJfA REDEVELOPMENT Executive Director �oN�) PODS 7 ( WSkirUti G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Pre-Application Forms 2011\Pre-app Forms-JUNE 20111PDI-PUD Amendment Pre-application June 2011.doc revised: 8/5/02,rev.5/26/10 "_ I _,�: ,`a�'v1£t`IDMENT iNStJPSTANTI P01.ifa', .,i 1 S MITTA> 'CHE..'Ls - I THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED NOT REQUIREMENTS #OF COPIES SUBMITTED REQUIRED (1 additional copy if located in Immokalee) / (1 additional copy if for affordable housing) If project includes an V Affordable Housing component, you are required to schedule a meeting before the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee by contacting the Collier County Housing and Human Services Department at 239-252-2273. _Completed Application (download from website for current form) r ' ,,/ Pre-application Meeting notes .— v--- — Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy — f _Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy - — Detailed description of why amendment is necessary Nil PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined _ ✓ — PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # `� +Detailed description of proposed changes/Project Narrative C-i"'�t. r _ T / Deeds/Legal's & Survey ) 3 v---List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 �- Owner/Agent Affidavit signed & notarized ,iv_(1.14ini coo(Tact--hu(c -4 2 V Copy of completed Addressing Checklist 1 Copy of 8 1" X 1 1" graphic location map of site 1 Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) 7 ,-- Copy of Traffic Impact Statement(TIS) on CDROM 3 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and digital/electronic copy of EIS 3 „/' Electronic copy of all documents and plans (CDRom or Diskette) or / exemption justification 2 Fee Calculations: ® $1500.00 (Insubstantial) ® $100.00 Fire Code Review Fee ® $500.00 Pre-application fee (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-app meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required.) ® $925.00 Legal Advertising Fee-CCPC meeting /J 0 $2500.00 EIS Review Transportation Fees, if required (please attach a separate check for transportation fees) N ] $500.00 Methodology Review Fee, if required rt/® $750.00 Minor Study Review Fee, if required A(liE] $1,500.00 Major Study Review Fee,if required /1)® Other Property Owner Notifications: $1.50 Non-certified (To be paid after receipt of invoice from Planning Department) G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Pre-Application Forms 2011\Pre-app Forms-JUNE 2011\PDI-PUD Amendment Pre-application June 2011.doc revised: 8/5/02, rev. 5/26/10 Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 CURRENT PUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN AM-01 Meplew .7D.85-01a1 MDPR1.503.5010101.a(c .2012 327.PM AIRPORT PULLING ROAD-200'R.O.W. _ _ -— q €m r-- AIRPORT ROAD CANAL ` I -- .-...--.-....----.-,....-.... _.4.._.. ....._____.,___ ' &O ( 1 / < >,,i' / < >3 gFj PI g E o 99 J O W Z N a v v-, N N o ♦ ' r � 1 r'.':,,& $ggc 3 i q to iii €"'i i5- c m z r1L. �8 � �§ A v P H 4gF5F 14 5 p m y m g M E ' •_- A D L7 a __ cn m n M1 H Cr2 ! < gin '- 5 & » »» » » 1 og 9 e - z r ♦ r ♦ $x' xa '$ ♦ c c m T A C . 1 / \ 1 DCO / / \\I i Id >�y _ ®6 Z �y � y O v! N I AQtPOR LLING• � � 2 O I Eh - r x ry �� Lid z 1 01 ..,, L ♦� x 1 0 E i w ccoo 0.4.--Ir17.-- ii ::-w-*■ III 1 .* >:.?.5 LIP 2D m° mor- 1 F ° m i v / / i I a El J o / h\l m / z // b s a z� E 3 I A 7 I I 1 / / I f I r s goFmgp. Fa Dmc i c �l6 q Z is f€ A T iN zmacoN' - o=3zx5 a D ° n m _Zggliblill■—_ N r{C -I Z SCALE:1....SO' m a CA rn PLAN REVISIONS 5® mom REVISED PER COM,COMMENTS WALDROP {D ® OM9Y1R REVISED PER COW,COMMENTS NAPLES VIEW . ,. Q OYOY,R REVISED PER COUMYCOMMENB ENGINEERING CLIENT: NAPLES VIEW, LLC. 7 /_ � PUD MASTER PLAN --__ IA•D Ofld01MBY7 CONSULTANTS 6 #'^ EXHIBIT"C" 2810D BONITA GRANDE DIM-SUITE 305 BOMMA SPRINGS,FL 34135 P:230-405-7777 F.2304057890 EMAIL SdalMaldropeyawaimiDon... .e..••••••.....,..e We..e.Rei.u.sofR. UM L'M M a♦ We IMF..•IM..•W.NM LI8IHX3 = _ _ _ I1V1d x3.LSVNi Qfld — ,.IIMIWO .ae _SIN3WW00 A.LNfl0O dad 03SIA321 ZL!£OISO �"��'°�" V^ I I `M IA S�IdVI�I LI`I�I ID S1N3WW00 AINf100 dad 03SIA3d ZL/30/40 E. 9N11133N19N3 PIIA S�TIdVN SIN3WW00 A1Nl001�3d 03SIA32! ZL LZ/s0 s x J ` S1N3WW00 AlNf100 LI3d 03SIA3M LL/LZ/ZL Uo(!Q�V/.\ — SNO[SIA321 NV'id 'STN : ivoS z co —�� _______ __=Rik ¢Z zZ 0 JQ -3 g Li W oN °z�3^ ZW I0I-}o(00 D �W0:D-a °Z '� 1 LL ZmIL F_0 m LL wwa-('r=F w rce=❑rez, 4., ZU Z_,W O OLL ix j ¢ ~m J0LL J O O cCm X2� 0.- co<0 co W ¢ s-_-w- ----_-_-_-_----_-_ -______--_, Iti,_________,-,-„.....r......- _,C/I- F_1 .., UJ 0<U1 1-< wort .F1111 c; , kI • y o }❑rn I .....„, ,, , , Pi, I , <, ,,-,„0,2< ■ ►�C i[ O I- �Q w ern: •� 1Odlld ■ o�w p1- W ¢ ' z am=5 z I J , F Z ❑ W CO 0 0 1 --** '6 e 41, J❑W O�o. Y ¢ate I �_. Ui ¢O Z ••J ' - Z ■So I . J w H m T)Z u_ II I b w 0 �¢ w ¢ ca z z�0 J- I 1 L_ f Y ❑z ow 2 ¢ Zx w ce z 0 Z I • I (�Q}� H -_ III Zack QQ w ce1- a0¢Z 50 ix W O LL U ~ JLL? mzJ U OW �zOJ oi ¢ LL O �O- 0�> ¢ x(0 �O¢z LL ❑ F-0_ ❑ z ado: �U� w �z dvxiWO /� g z v z J vOa aLia z zo awva 0 co z W a n Q �' oi-U y2Oa -, 0.;- _jW , 0_ wZ w�❑ ¢W ¢¢Zce � F W I.LI rn,w 000) w >0 z ¢¢ co I Oz j Z Q�Q WHO re J �> �pdWO w W o a ��w a'a •w a- ccaU)0 Z Z IZ� -10LL • Oz w0<<La' \ i W c • I re Z ry ' Z O F m LL / LL W o 0 0 0 1 Oa; 0 00 rn rn J ❑ 0 0 PKU W w¢ N e- R Q ¢ I- I I- W 0wU. a z¢ ¢W ? aJ o 8 0 J Z¢ ° o - J ¢ O D 1 �_____—__—_____ Z W J V Co O V Z 0 Z w \ M'O'M r cc 1- W n ui ¢ _ `` H x a_° 0 W ¢ 0 11.J co U I//� W +i fi ai J 0 0 a m g I F, �/ ci N t0 01 M Xa¢ `-- 1 W U LL W F a N m o z0_ 4N 1 I z Q < I- E F I J 2C CC -H * +i Z W O to W i I O°' F- G ¢ V (0 - Co OJ ❑ w I w W J ❑ co ¢ Z I . f C J CO J W r ¢W J LLJ Z C7 E I -,O} I . ' cc Fz (0< ¢ ¢ Z I Zrr 0 . z7 ¢� w 0_ W I Oa- . ce I w0~ z w D ¢ 0 a I rcc� z Ua} OU J LJi W d j 11 O i LL ' ' p a l ct�~ O O.'± Z > ¢ Q O ul �� CT�� 7' t owLL J o w uai O z}0 '1 ; "+ w u❑-i w w Z Z O F 1 F CL 0 _1 1 • U j O Z p a 0 N } �1 -ItlNV� avoalaodaig_ _____� O 0 W ? z Z 0 F- U f_____ --s CC J J O W W W O 2ZZ¢ W 0 Q > 0. < 0 Z x °w.lwi. O U J O co o W 0 g ❑ CL w W a U a ❑ > 'M'O'M.00Z �❑ —-a�z- aHOM`JNllifld 1MOdMIH N� O i0 Lwi 3 J VW(L1CS:C MVP/s 8.1,'L LXB-LOIOLOS9Z1S0Aea\d°W 1O•LO-99Z10b00MA•'elA seldeN LO-S9Z14r +u■ vim+"°" 3.1.19IHX3 • �� = Ptl7dH31StlW Gild ZZ M3IA I 1l133NPJN3 ° dO�1alVM L � d1 E c SN3 li q1,31,1 ir F--pv i. l I L ii: ' 5a ! 9a /1 •may ,1 —' .�I w SO� 6' tL;IuIIL V 8i _ Q I; bjliNgrIltiW, Iwo 1 Tip. wPp i u Zvi 5 5 iii 5e 44 t 6 a a� ' 0 g0 E L 1 Iii 's ,d jil.i i r __ 11 8 i! i,ly i phi . s 5 . -I f 0.1121 s 4 15ri S s59gil, 1 1 r LL j ¢ Y ' 1,.„., Iii t Y7 IS its 4 e r\ il -—-—-'M'°YAUE.aTtoVa-rind iENexov __ _-- Naples View RPUD–Insubstantial Change — PL2014-0504 REVISED PUD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN „J„ti9IHX3 t - «.« «,« weld K3 LStlIH and r'""'.""="°'''''”" � "DTI`DNITIfld 1110c1 11V 0069:1113I D = i 9NI1133N19N3 V dONl /M M A SaIdVN ._ .a� ; — M33 101+ 5 e l' »�o N V 3',q 2 / , I IL g a y hi „ ' �_ I' wow .� f■/�'� �z a ¢"� ; � r1�1 �o- a o ■ 3 . I a0i � z i ' e _•�Y.�. __ J-,1 O ssrsw�v-sw+ i a z w i 14/11111 ` ' — I a o = gaw III MP= a3i PI . - . _-,;__, s a it ill - 1 4 • -3 ~ 3 i i 9l! i i ? 1@ psi \ --------------- i li i 1 ill pg Moro g B i i i Eq ! !id � �'— e i p,9 11411 gliliii of s ; � jjF 1 b 4 r 1 �� is 1 / s ,' er I li I I S t li —------ M'Oro.00L'OVOtl`JNi fl 1tlOdNIV .O ti O311M. .00 1.IHIHX3 """.. .4 ..T, _ _ 4V'Id 1I31SVNI and 'DTI`JINII I I11d L2IOd2II� 0069 Z1■I3I"ID y 9NIt133NIJN3 rn�In S�'Id�'I�I - i �a7�•. V— S1N3WWOO��V1S2i3d43S1A3a 4L/6Z/40 Q NN m SNOISIA311 NV-Id ,'1'N :31` OS z i`�'_, �:�� W. O =J¢Z- 00 LLw II1Il'Ii a0 ZU) z 1 z 00U- , ¢ cc 2 w -, 141 ft owl ...1 ;) �aa / �l ,, 'I f, RI w I . ,=, , c FL E_. W❑ Q 1,¢L m� 7� n. 1Lr • Q•L�J� 11 f11. OdIllb i 3 wo 4 i LJ¢ I w ,, P is 0 o I ( 0. z\' M — J cn❑Fri I O ' Y �■- °L I� I IY ui 1 ¢ Ha-1 I l 2 1 O r' Z(0 I z LL J w O H NZ LL J I N w 0 Wa.¢ w ¢ > Q. Z �o� ¢3 L f Y 1-Z Z= w a os W c� m o f g H - W z<O HQ w co-- aoaZ w r-z , l 0 Jc?z �z w �O �zz¢ ❑ UWj OLLU I I ' ¢ O ¢0� XO¢ z WW WgOQ CO LI- �� _' o o Z a�� Rizzo w viz ��Wz LL O z F- U) w J ZF_o_ ¢pd Z z- LL¢wp 0 ¢ ¢c< �VU NOa 2 �I- ��w U I H 0_W W co-,-w (W¢7�� W » Z¢ZQ X o wz> Z z�¢ WOO �> OpgWw W I w I w O a am0 Q'a ui �� Qw�� N w a a"( 0! ❑ ❑ m UU�UO Z Z =Z_ JDLL 2 OZ WO¢¢W I` < < H¢H ¢Ln0 ZO dJMLLw -- \ j W CO • O - N M O ui Z 0 0 LY m I ZO_ LL 0 I LL w o 0 o e \ U �Wa� w ° Wp N � vr' > > Q I- W O w w a Z C0� O. a 0 H w Ir 5 �� e o o g a ° ❑ 0 �______________ - 0 w Q 7 0 Z Z N a0 ❑ p' I Z U¢ w w n 0 1.- LL I Moa W o ❑ ❑ U W Z W ``\---- \ I W H in In ¢ cn 0 < CO I 0 \ W ii +I +I ii 0! .- d 'm I H fh N 10 N 00.¢ W I , W 0 Q ix W oi r- v N F H ay. -J z 2 Z cc F < I J H +1 +I +I �O Z Lii I Z I i ?�^. Q 2 Q < t M coop � � W I a H ON❑ I W I , ce w D m Z I r l 1 J ° J (l) W J I I! W Q W ¢ W ¢ Z I Q 1 ci i w Z O w ? Q ZWJ Z I �z -J 0 x Ow LL i �R. W1c OLL Y W 1-- W C' J ZO Q- LYH.- Z O F 0 a.uii'- J O w y 0 z I¢ ow O g z z c� � w w w - o z O 1 — U c� Z ° a ° ----- l IHNVO CIVOa la0cili _ _____� O z 2 = co z co--- ------- Q O w y W O IC CL C7) I- . W ZU W m 6¢. > O g j 0 w CL LL OZ. M 0- U 0. ❑ 'M'o'a AOZ a_Ek" --ovoa oNnind Iaodaly N 0 En i WV L£:6L.6 PLOZ/OV 6.P'L Lx8•L0403LO99ZWueld lueunOLdON1 003•1.0 99Z\sllptl><3-804MaJaVdnoi9Ie 1de0)4 sOId N LO-99ZNT Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 ORDINANCE 2012-22 1■YL ORDINANCE NO— 2- 22 By AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE $#? 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY L4 DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED itIg te`- 1 COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR Tifg UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ^' AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPOY = ( CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEIg4I ca 0 DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTU ` (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED - 4' DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE NAPLES VIEW RPUD TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF SIXTY-SIX RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6900 AIRPORT ROAD NORTH IN SECTION 01, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Alexis Crespo, AICP of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., representing Naples View LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 01, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as the Naples View RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 66 residential dwelling units in accordance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. Naples View RPUD\PUDZ-PL201 I-1519 Rev. 5/07/12 1 of 2 SECTION TWO: -- This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this c2lt� day of ja_.1 P. , 2012. LJ• ... AT� .. • '_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGw-g. B) , CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA . By lull. 11oCtAt• +A +• le k FRED W. COYLE, Chairman • • 01.1' Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: � \g`y - •ei•i A hton-Cicko Section Chief, Land Use/Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A— List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B—Development Standards Exhibit C - Master Plan Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E— List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F—Development Commitments CP\1 1-CPS-01 121\51 This ordinance filed with the the Z day-'da of S--1 ) Office Q l �� Z and ocknowledgeme t of„thot fiii received this day of V c9Cf By Deputy Clerk Naples View RPUD\PUDZ-PL2011-1519 Rev. 5/07/12 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES NAPLES VIEW RPUD PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses and Structures: "R1"Residential Tracts 1. Single-family detached dwelling units 2. Zero lot line units 3. Two-family, duplex dwelling units 4. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools, tennis courts,volleyball courts,fishing docks,walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts. "R2"Residential Tracts 1. Single family detached dwelling units 2. Zero lot line units 3. Two-family, duplex dwelling units 4. Townhouse dwelling units 5. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools,tennis courts, volleyball courts, fishing docks, walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts. Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code(LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principle Uses including but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports,garages,and utility buildings. 2. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents, including swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts,fishing docks,walking paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 4. Entry Gates&Gatehouse. 5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Water management facilities. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals,pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code(LDC). C. Development Density A maximum of 66 dwelling units shall be constructed within the RPUD per the Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) bonus density provisions set forth in Exhibit F, Section 5. The gross project area is 11.3±acres and the residential density maximum shall be 5.84 units per acre. Naples View RPUD—PUDZ-PL2011-1519 Page 1 of 7 Last Revised:May 3,2012 EXHIBIT B _ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NAPLES VIEW RPUD Development of the Naples View RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat,final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district shall apply. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Naples View RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS") PERMITTED USES AND Single Family Zero Lot Two Townhome Recreation STANDARDS Detached Line Family, Duplex Min.Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1,400 SF N/A Min.Lot Width121 50' 40' 35' 16' N/A SETBACKS Fronti3X41 15' 15' 15' 15' 20' _ Side 5' 5'10' 5'/0' 5'/0' 20' Rear(Principal) 15' 10' 10' 10' 10' Rear(Accessory) 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' Water body 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' Airport Pulling Rd. 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Min.Distance Between 10' 1070'i5i 10'/0'm 10'/0'i5i Sum of Y:BH Principal Structures Max.Building Height Zoned 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' Actual 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' No.of Stories 2 2 _ 2 2 2 (1) Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 SF for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 SF. (2) Minimum lot width may be reduced by 25%for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. (3) The minimum 15'front yard setback may be reduced to 10'where the residence has a recessed,side entry,or rear entry garage. In no case shall there be less than a clear area of 23 feet between the back of the sidewalk and the face of the garage door for front entry garages. (4) For corner lots,only one(1)front yard setback shall be required.The yard that does not contain the driveway/vehicular access to the residence shall provide 10'setback. (5) Distance between buildings may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0'where attached garages are provided,and a 10' minimum,if detached. Naples View RPUD—PUDZ-PL2011-1519 Page 2 of 7 Last Revised:May 3,2012 sw.a mosw.wawash-0+rvrr.onroaraa.nw MOM tsrawr 1 11 1-- -.191 __11 1 1 i i i 1 i i . •' 2 A A/IPO AG ' , _ i is 1 i i ili ( : „/ =11 q 0 0 11 3t.; /0 ' ' 111 gi i i m � _ I -. • • i 1 .xl lg 1 60 is is N , " + N v ! 1 ! i z1 i ]1 7-74 /1 N: N Y 4?a N N N N --i L---� i ig 8 i o 61 T N.O.W. •`� a A ;0 , I p 4 oc a • sa N �� t-- _ a m � � igE 1191 _ M 7 1 Q �< i I z " o ! g IIII — 1 Eili ‘f - 91 /I '-'i 1 ..L i i_.J 102 .. _ I 1 - Rii;11 9 r .; " - ,E.; _ 4,)1 ''' ■ ! illii t1 ' n.....i!,-II u,..,_.,_._\. .0 ---..:.--- urii 1 -- °� g .Z�iIiiii $CALG:N.T.O. ,su,,.va.ce�r WALD RUP A „i„ .an NAPLES VIEW • j� --- I �� PS,21160 PER 0012ITY 001/02211 MIME REVISED_ PER COUNTY meows C 1%NAPLES VIEW,LLC. // 1 oiN�2 iEVU®Nei COUNT( run uASf,a Tux ,______ EXHIBIT"V r-I ' Page 3 of 7 Naples View RPUD—PUDZ-PL2011-1519 Last Revised:May 3,2012 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION - NAPLES VIEW RPUD NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH %:OF THE SOUTHWEST'A OF THE SOUTHWEST'A OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF FOR STATE RIGHT- OF-WAY. Naples View RPUD—PUDZ-P12011-1519 Page 4 of 7 Last Revised:May 3,2012 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC NAPLES VIEW RPUD Deviation 1: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.0 which requires a 15-foot wide Type "B" buffer where proposed residential uses abut existing commercial uses, to allow for a 10-foot wide Type "B" buffer where the property abuts the commercial use to the north. Deviation No. 2:Deviation from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height,to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height.The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. Deviation No. 3: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01, which requires a minimum width of 60 feet for cul-de-sac and local street rights-of-way,to allow for a minimum 45-foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. Deviation 4: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.1 which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow the dead end street shown on the RPUD Master Plan. Deviation 5: Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum wall height of six (6) feet in residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum height of eight (8) feet for a combination wall and berm along the property lines. Naples View RPUD—PUDZ-PL2011.1519 Page 5 of 7 Last Revised:May 3,2012 EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS NAPLES VIEW RPUD 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the general development commitments for the project. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval,the Managing Entity is Naples View, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity,then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out,then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. UTILITIES 2.1 The project shall connect to the Collier County Water Sewer District (CCWSD) potable water system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.2 The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.3 The project shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a location determined by CCWSD when capacity is available. 2.4 Should the Collier County Water Sewer District determine that it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the project; the Developer shall either construct interim potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities, or shall postpone development until such time as the Collier County Water- Sewer District service capacity is available to service the project. Any interim facilities constructed by the Developer shall be constructed to Collier County Utilities Division Standards, and shall be dismantled, at the Developer's expense, upon connection to the Collier County Water-Sewer District facilities. Whether potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-potable water facilities are provided on-site or off-site, the Developer shall demonstrate to Collier County that adequate capacity is available at the time of final utilities plan submittal. 2.5 All customers shall be customers of the CCWSD. 3. TRANSPORTATION A. The project shall maintain a minimum of 100' throat distance between the Airport Pulling right-of-way and the face of the entrance gates. B. The developer shall pay a proportionate fair share for improvements to the Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Pulling Road intersection. The proportionate fair share of the project's impacts to the intersection shall be Naples View RPUD—PUDZ-PL2011.1519 Page 6 of 7 Last Revised:May 3,2012 determined at the time of construction plan approval based upon the project's trips as percentage of capacity improvements for the turning/through movements utilized by this site. Payment shall be made to Collier County within 90 days of the County's request. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL No preservation area is required as all existing,on-site vegetation is exotic. 5. PLANNING The RPUD shall be developed with up to 66 units per Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) bonus density, as defined in Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The developer shall provide the two(2)Transportation Demand Management(TDM)criteria as follows: 1. Provide vehicular access to the future mixed use subdistrict to the north as shown on the PUD Master Plan, in the form of a non-exclusive access easement to the adjacent property owner/developer to the North,conveyed prior to issuance of the first building permit. 2. Provide pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project and a bicycle/pedestrian interconnection to the future mixed use subdistrict to the north shown on the PUD Master Plan. Naples View RPUD—PUDZ-PL2011.1519 Page 7 of 7 Last Revised:May 3,2012 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of : ORDINANCE 2012-22 which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 26th day of June, 2012 , during Regular Session. r--, WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 27th day of June, 2012 . DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk., Ex-officio to Boarcl,� r`��i`°?S, County Commissioners ��,.f, ;'',; a, : ^ , ', B : Teresa Cannon,; \`' ' `! Deputy Clerk r Naples View RPUD– Insubstantial Change — PL2014-0504 BULLET LIST OF PROPOSED CHANGES WAI DROP CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS ENGINEERING 28100 BONITA GRADE DR. #305 BONIiA SPRINGS,FL 34136 P:239.408.7777 F:239-408-7899 BULLET LIST OF PROPOSED INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGES NAPLES VIEW RPUD PUD DOCUMENT/PUD MASTER PLAN CHANGES: • Exhibit A— List of Permitted Uses > Combine "R1" and "R2" Residential Tracts into a single "Residential Tract" category > Remove two—family and townhouse dwelling units from the schedule of uses > Add reference to the Hearing Examiner process for determining comparable uses > Modify Development Density statement to reduce density from 66 dwelling units (5.84 du/acre)to 33 dwelling units (2.9 du/acre). • Exhibit B—Development Standards > Remove Two-Family and Townhome column from development standards table • Exhibit C—RPUD Master Plan -- ➢ Remove "Vehicular/Bicycle/Pedestrian Linkage to Future PUD" label and arrows ➢ Remove reference to "R1" and "R2" tracts and re-label as "Residential Tract" ➢ Revise Land Use Summary Table to reflect reduced unit count and density • Exhibit D—Legal Description ➢ No changes • Exhibit E—List of Requested Deviations from LDC > Add New Deviation 6 to allow one (1) boundary marker sign at the southern property corner fronting on Airport Pulling Road, in addition to residential entrance signs. ➢ Add New Deviation 7 to allow 80 square feet of combined entry signage. • Exhibit F—PUD Commitments ➢ Modify Managing Entity to reflect current owner, 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC > Remove Commitment 5 regarding bonus density criteria Naples View PDI—PL2014-0504 Bullet List of Proposed Changes Page 1 of 1 Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 BOUNDARY SURVEY ......a............-...-,-,.......................... - "RM'c ROAD .1(-F5 3" - N 023512'V 1184.18. 1g a• , Z It aNt 4 , 1 c N 02.3512.h,394.80' * 1, * . *I; L3,1!N M 5 1'9 1 • 4r1 I ,1 * I; 11 II I ■ r. i a r----"T-2-"\, • , I C. ,....1 ,......, •,,,,,,,,si.y*...,,,i * I ,ON . a 1 SIPA...-73 PMRISP I , , . Es , :. a„: Pligillee .- „ -„re-- ,. -4 .44 * * " i 9 ig- -'e i * IP '-qi 121 J ; Fp e4 0 4geK.SaMlki / \* )//// ) . w I g 0 97.-a g re24 1-5F..vv,4,77 * Mr 114"e6i • :I I'L 4 4 0 o :1 la -a :. 1 b 8 - * A * o 4 It 2, )11 P 1 1 Ei "i t.,z PI _G-----ir-----*---.--4. P ii.44-1 a i :—1-M----a'.-N ,..,„ .„, 8 ; 4 t .1 a • a , p r fl Pz\ • 4 4 4. P it, Z .- , ii 0 pa Cs* 1 k 9 -, * e g t,1A Pas 1 A: j i. n e.■ 4 -1. — I ? •••A li:4 • 1 I:...I P' pg ''4'-' " I z P t jos it i * * C . & I GI . & " " 14144 ,ii 41.14 , 4 , 4 6 1111 li :1ii 1r. ... , 4 M a !X12 ii t pi li i i A ' 1 r 4 ; co * • '1 4r. ,.. 14,/ 9 ii " **a . . A o ) 11.e 5 k i R ' igC. g IP q " rE 14 1 ri rV . 1 r*P 1.4 • l'i P 7 • • `A' / **II* * 4,8 /* : Ili a : * pVi I Ri” 1 1! IE. I 1 g 1 4 i M ! it 0 \ - . • . : i 299 - i I T.. ..k.i. 14 g g el 4 * P 1 : • -•.‘1 I / 0. tk .4, R I '..* i .- . , 4-' r / % I ',73 :.• .g- c,;,' iiHg 4 ,:,3,.0.a.,0 s E igi ti 5,1 il'i !il T to iv.- 11`.1 14 ,•4 ■,.-e. =4 o P4.45 TRACI ,A. C...... ••.... 11 7 LaNc cox -----1-...-----' 1,_,I i ii -s"2. ,i= "if. I it Itg. AYLINGT014/1,1.1.,177E..12::,I'IVO i a _ apl ,9 _al 2 F.: p g ARS -i. t,9,'.-:.T-I•s 1.1;;VI fl i V. • Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 OWNER AFFIDAVIT SIGNED & NOTARIZED & LIST OF PARTIES IN THE ORGANIZATION Cother County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL2014-0504 i.William Depietri (print name).as Manaaina Member _ (title,if applicable)of 6900 Airport Pulling, LLC (company,If a plicahle),swear or affirm under oath.that I am the(choose one)owners applicantncontract purchaser and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s)requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code: 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true: 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application:and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided unencumbered by the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Waldrop Engineering.P.A.c/o Alexis Crespo.A1CP to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including I through 2 above. *Votes: • If the applicant is a corporation. then it is usually executed by the corp.pres. or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents shouhl typically be signed by the Company's -Managing Member.- • lithe applicant is a partnership. then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner-of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust. then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee-. • In each instance.first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate. twist, partnership, estate, etc., and then use the appropriate formal fin.that ownership. Under p n !ties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts state in I are true. I ____, //.-___e;) ((`-/ U Signature l ' Date STATE OF FL-Om AHASS4'G�14le" COUNTY OF GOWER WOt'ticS-G'r The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on /4arcit2k LA it( (date) by WII,G,*Dep.erni (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as fri4n4 .//41,4-er who is personally known to me or who has produced.Sft,-4i C,,era L-c,fr,4< (type of identification)as identification. 42.-iy-7.STAMP/SEAL Sig Notary Public ;� JOANN E PARADIS �OanA G a,' d, � �� 3/t3/2-e Pi I My �m/A'.ij: eras cOA-onuslss I Notary Public ( J CCM!7NWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS M 2/6/2014 1 •J My Commission Expires ( Page 4 of 5 March 13,2020 MA SOC Filing Number: 201478179830 Date: 3/19/2014 2:02:00 PM :.� .S•� The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Minimum Fee:$500.00 ,�' '`r William Francis Galvin 1 L..- l ' 1 Secretary of the Commonwealth, Corporations Division One Ashburton Place, 17th floor ` Boston, MA 02108-1512 i F'� : tv `,.s.- Telephone: (617) 727-9640 Certificate of Organization l (General Laws, Chapter) Federal Employer Identification Number: 001131289 (must be 9 digits) i' i 1. The exact name of the limited liability company is: 6900 AIRPORT PULLING, LLC ,, 2a. Location of its principal office: No. and Street: 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 City or Town: SOUTHBOROUGH State: MA Zip: 01772 Country: USA 2b. Street address of the office in the Commonwealth at which the records will be maintained: No. and Street: 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 City or Town: SOUTHBOROUGH State: MA Zip: 01772 Country: USA 3. The general character of business, and if the limited liability company is organized to render professional service, the service to be rendered: IS TO ENGAGE IN THE INVESTMENT, OWNERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT OF REAL ESTATE AN D ANY INTEREST THEREIN ANYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES, INCLUDING BUYING, ACQU IRING, OWNING,LEASING, DEVELOPING, OPERATING, SELLING,FINANCING, REFINANCIN G, DISPOSING OF AND OTHERWISE DEALING WITH INTERESTS IN REAL ESTATE, DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, THROUGH JOINT VENTURES, PARTNERSHIPS OR OTHER ENTITIES,AND TO ENGAGE IN ANY ACTIVITY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RELATED OR INCIDENTAL THERETO AND TO ENGAGE IN ANY OTHER ACTIVITY IN WHICH A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ORG ANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MAY LAWFULL Y ENGAGE. 4. The latest date of dissolution, if specified: 5. Name and address of the Resident Agent: Name: WILLIAM A. DEPIETRI No. and Street: 259 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 100 City or Town: SOUTHBOROUGH State: MA Zip: 01772 Country: USA I, WILLIAM A. DEPIETRI resident agent of the above limited liability company, consent to my appointment as the resident agent of the above limited liability company pursuant to G. L. Chapter 156C Section 12. 6. The name and business address of each manager, if any: Title Individual Name Address (no Po Box) First,Middle,Last,Suffix l Address,City or Town,State,Zip Code MANAGER WILLIAM A.DEPIETRI 259 TURNPIKE ROAD,SUITE 100 SOUTHBOROUGH,MA 01772 USA 7. The name and business address of the person(s) in addition to the manager(s), authorized to execute documents to be filed with the Corporations Division, and at least one person shall be named if there are no managers. Title Individual Name Address (no PO Box) First,Middle,Last,Suffix Address,City or Town,State,Zip Code SOC SIGNATORY WILLIAM A.DEPIETRI 259 TURNPIKE ROAD,SUITE 100 SOUTHBOROUGH,MA 01772 USA 8. The name and business address of the person(s) authorized to execute, acknowledge, deliver and record any recordable instrument purporting to affect an interest in real property: Title Individual Name Address (no PO Box) First,Middle,Last,Suffix Address,City or Town,State,Zip Code REAL PROPERTY WILLIAM A.DEPIETRI 259 TURNPIKE ROAD,SUITE 100 SOUTHBOROUGH,MA 01772 USA 9. Additional matters: SIGNED UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY, this 19 Day of March, 2014, WILLIAM A. DEPIETRI (The certificate must be signed by the person forming the LLC.) ©2001 -2014 Commonwealth of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved MA SOC Filing Number: 201478179830 Date: 3/19/2014 2:02:00 PM THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS I hereby certify that, upon examination of this document, duly submitted to me, it appears that the provisions of the General Laws relative to corporations have been complied with, and I hereby approve said articles; and the filing fee having been paid, said articles are deemed to have been filed with me on: March 19, 2014 02:02 PM low . ,,•401/ .1. WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN Secretary of the Commonwealth Naples View RPUD—Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 WARRANTY DEED INSTR 4962964 OR 5022 PG 1805 RECORDED 4/2/2014 11:29 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC @.70 $13,650.00 REC $18.50 CONS $1,950,000.00 This instrument prepared without review or opinion of title by,and after recording return to: I Kevin A.Denti,Esquire Z W KEVIN A.DENTI,P.A. 2180 lmmokalee Road-Suite#316 o ff. C Naples,Florida 34110 C z T. Telephone: 239-260-8111 • 11 q513 i : G J C ‘T•• Documentary Stamp Tax: S13,650.00 Ft Parcel I.D.4: 00236120000 L E., Cad File Number: Terra-1013-38 3az W Above Space for Clerk's Use Only F cA o Q WARRANTY DEED 2014, by and between NAPLES r THIS INDENTURE, mad,-10,) y VIEW, LLC, a Florida limited,Y tl company, who office address is 23421 Walden Center Drive, Suite 300, Bonit Sp• • •rida 34134,the NTOR", and 6900 AIRPORT PULLING, LLC, a Massac e• 1 ha•1 • <• pany, wh se post office address is 259 ~ Turnpike Road, Suite 100, S uth•• : r ■: a..1 a,'. ` .. th "GRANTEE". WITNESSETH, th t . • 1/11� • c" . . and ,n co i,fSration of the sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, and o ` 1 _o s• an. •a ua. e onsi -raf�'to said GRANTOR in hand paid by said GRANTEE, the O.ipt whereof is here aekn le ged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said GRAN , d GRANTEE'S i - ssigns forever, the following described real property situate,1 being in Collier ,Florida: The North one-half(N 1/2) o - k`• cag,iat (N 1/2) of the Southwest one- quarter(SW 1/4)of the Southwest one-quarter re (SW 1/4)of Section 1,Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, excepting therefrom the West 100 feet thereof for State road right-of-way. SUBJECT to restrictions and easements common to the subdivision, oil, gas, and mineral rights of record,if any,and real estate taxes for 2014 and all subsequent years. TOGETHER with all of the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. GRANTOR does hereby fully warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR has hereunto set GRANTOR'S hand and seal the day and year first above written. *** OR 5022 PG 1806 *** Signed, sealed,and delivered NAPLES VIEW,LLC a Flori'a ' ited in tt(�hhJe'(presence of:B liability company Witness#1 Walter S. Hagenbuck /Manager Print Name Below: "ThP.Odore Ven+l /2 Witness#2 Print Name Below: ,fir A. STATE OF COUNTY OF FLORIDA CQ �'e,r /;--- ' ._ raj The foregoing instrUinerzf c�vas—was ed efor'e me this �-) LL day of nai rAA , 2014 by Walt S.11-lit-- bus 1l s\Managgr df NAPLES VIEW, LLC, a Florida limited liability compan s • ' -q - -'tabJV Ato ire or [ ] who has produced aS ide {ti >catinn ; -% °l i li 7'11��,,1 ` f N'" Y PUBLIC i'', CommissItt# 058295 "'-y c / L �`:d Expires t10Ye �'41 � IFeYP!?�D OR PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY e r.'+r� 19 '� ''��.,,.� �°^"° ---------c�� COMMISSION EXPIRES: ' C 1 --"--->-- Terra-1013-38 Terra-1013-38 Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 APPROVED ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre- application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD(Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans& Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal& Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) U OTHER PDI-Insubstanial Change to PUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Section 1, Township 49, Range 25 East &_ ,/ 20 FOLIO(Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00236120000 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Naples View PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) N/A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER forexistin ( existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL# N/A Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Naples View Please Check One: ❑ Checklist is to be Faxed back ❑ Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: Alexis Crespo, AICP - alexisc @waldropengineering.com PHONE(239) 405-7777 FAX Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY FLN Number(Primary) 66.236/2 ©©O Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: f Date: II- ( Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change _ P12014-0504 AERIAL LOCATION MAP J -�z --t THW' m J J L A 2 r� W ? _ 2 sl E - .444 •. .4-4( -'" I/ ---,44p: . .. 1,-011 " ' Q 17' at . t ti is . . � I VS t. ! y i; 1 IC r 1 ,, {, %' • r A l di Vi • �. : t1 4 7t } p � W tt. e 1 illl l .r''''' . :,:r:4' Ir, . , . . , , . , ' . . .- '.* ..."*"' " ' ''-1 ."‘''."'.. . $?'' ''•••''''' • .1 g -. 1,... .. ,..• . i ._-_,.,. ..;-, , , _,•,.1 - ,,,,. .„ ,;,, T. , 4 , , ...;it., . 1,_„..4.4.., .:, mt. ; . ; ; . t r t i :' ' ` 2• ull - _ . r mot'... I• x,k •t k . , %. :1 3;k t k. i <,. • , 1,� =; t...' H k�k,.; V; • 1 7 .'p r . Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 JUSTIFICATIONS/ RATIONALE FOR DEVIATIONS WALDROP ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 28100 BONITA GRANDE DR. #305 BONRA SPRINGS,FL 34135 P:239.4057777 F:239-405-7899 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC NAPLES VIEW RPUD Deviation 1: Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.0 which requires a 15-foot wide Type "B" buffer where proposed residential uses abut existing commercial uses, to allow for a 10-foot wide Type "B" buffer where the property abuts the commercial use to the north. (APPROVED PER ORD. 12-22) Deviation No. 2: Deviation from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary sign or banner up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and a maximum of 8 feet in height, subject to approval under temporary sign permit procedures in the LDC.. The temporary sign or banner shall be limited to 28 days per calendar year. (APPROVED PER ORD. 12-22) Deviation No. 3: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01, which requires a minimum width of 60 feet for cul- de-sac and local street rights-of-way, to allow for a minimum 45-foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. (APPROVED PER ORD. 12-22) Deviation 4: Deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which prohibits dead-end streets, to allow the dead end street shown on the RPUD Master Plan. (APPROVED PER ORD. 12-22) Deviation 5: Deviation from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2, which permits a maximum wall height of six (6) feet in residential zoning districts, to allow for a maximum height of eight (8) feet for a combination wall and berm along the property lines. (APPROVED PER ORD. 12-22) Deviation 6: Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6, which permits two (2) ground signs per entrance to the development, to allow one (1) wall-mounted boundary marker sign not to exceed 16 square feet at the southern property corner fronting along Airport Pulling Road, in addition to project entry signage. Boundary marker signs are limited to the community name and logo. Justification: The Applicant is seeking an additional boundary marker sign to increase the community's visibility and better delineate the property from surrounding master-planned communities. The additional sign will be integrated into the wall fronting on Airport Pulling Road with a consistent architectural theme and character, and will the not negatively impact viewsheds from surrounding roadways. The signage setbacks from rights-of-way will meet LDC standards, thereby ensuring public, health, safety and welfare is protected. Deviation 7: Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6.b, which permits two (2)ground or wall signs per entrance to the development with a combined sign area of 64 square feet, to allow for two (2)ground or wall signs at the project entrance with a combined sign area of 80 s.f. Naples View PDI—PL2014-0504 Deviation Narrative Page 1 of 2 Justification: The subject property front along an arterial roadway, which demonstrates relatively high travel speeds. Additionally, the property has a significant street setback due to the location of the Airport Road Canal along the property's frontage. Due to the setback and the property's locational along this arterial roadway, the Applicant is seeking an increase to allowable entry signage area to ensure visibility of the community. This deviation request is similar to previous requests approved for master-planned communities within Collier County. The required setback from rights-of-way for entry signs will meet LDC standards, thereby ensuring public, health, safety and welfare is protected. Naples View PDI—PL2014-0504 Deviation Narrative Page 2 of 2 Naples View RPUD— Insubstantial Change PL2014-0504 SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT & PHOTOS SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (Section 10.03.00,COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE(LDC) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen(15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supercede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to Section 10.03.00 of the LDC. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED [ 1 e NC\ `� cxC)rf)-3 WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER CQUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER �1 ? cclu otooso4 eil • 1 c� Qo4 I kL C\v7Lr\ Lt b✓ . SIGNA fil OF A''LICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX ;1 � 1 Cr-e o° 1.3� re,S F"- #NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP 3413S STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The for(e�oing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this (� � day of (\ , 20i 9 , by �` ` �} Q$ personally known to me or who produced as identification S s dentification and who did/did not take an oath. 04\ N C : iu at -''' '...;;... JACQUELYN LAROCQUE Z of Notary Publi •`''? Notary Public-State of Florida • • •1 My Comm.Expires Oct 12.2016 �n C^`,t-` V n, n Nr - -. • ..416"-'-')'4. Commission N EE 831330 1�• V�}v �� J Printed N me of i otary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) F:\Website\AFFIDAVIT AND SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS 5-2-05.doc n • ' ti i ge e wiria , Iowa Pitin al ws ,y p k THE OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FORM (Please Print Legibly) *******•k*****:l•**********:F********************** *****************************9;***r,*k*****)t** AGENDA TITLE: lG"1/ O /10/61 Q/ . ilX; /'J L. AGENDA#: YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS: ( QYYI ,,/ Ti�U l`D PHONE#: PRINT NAME: �}'©Ul SIGNATURE: MAILING ADDRESS: 6,6,/ A7me L i //J (City) /64 94 (State) /4--/, (Zip Code) (3 /07 *PROXIMITY OF YOUR PROPERTY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY(in miles/blocks) Z..0 *******************************************************,*************************************** (check boxes which apply) EV-6R ❑ AGAINST ❑ GENERAL INTEREST ❑APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE RA WISH TO SPEAK AT THIS PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBIT 149 CP\08-CUA-00115\145 LT,