CCPC Agenda 05/15/2014 R COLLIER COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
May 15, 2014
AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., THURSDAY, MAY 15, 2014,
IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,
COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER,THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES, FLORIDA:
NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY
ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION
OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO
SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS
WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE
CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10
DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN
MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN
DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN
PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF
THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL
NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND
THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY
3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA
4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES— April 17,2014
6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
A. PUDZ-PL201300001374: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code,
which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,
Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of
the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural(A)Zoning District within the Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District — Receiving Lands Overlay, to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)
Zoning District within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District—Receiving Lands Overlay,to be known as
the Golf Club of the Everglades RPUD to allow up to 750 residential dwelling units,a golf course and
related recreational uses and 141 acres of native vegetation preserve. The subject property is located on
Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, just east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 31, Township 48
South, Range 27 East and Section 36, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida
consisting of 835.684±acres; providing for repeal of Resolution Nos. 91-16, 99-61, 00-189,07-117 and
Ordinance No. 10-08; and by providing an effective date. (Companion to PL20130000365/CP2013-4)
[Coordinator: Kay Deselem,Principal Planner]
Page 1 of 3
9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS—NOTE:Any items NOT heard or completed by 5:00 P.M.may be
moved to the June 5th meeting
Note: This item has been continued from the May 1,2014 CCPC meeting:
A. PL20120002909/CP-2013-3: An Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier
County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically
amending the Future Land Use Element to revise the Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Urban
Mixed Use District to remove the office and retail caps and allow up to 7,500 square feet of gross floor
area of commercial uses per acre or 11 residential dwelling units per acre, to make residential
development optional, to prohibit commercial and residential uses on the same parcel, to limit multi-
tenant commercial buildings to no more than 50% of the Commercial square footage to revise
development standards including the cap on the size of the footprint of Commercial buildings, and
providing for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for
severability; providing for an effective date. The subject property is located on the West side of
Airport Road and approximately 330 feet North of Orange Blossom Drive in Section 2, Township
49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.70 acres. (Companion to PUDZ-A-
PL20120002906) [Coordinator:Michele Mosca,Principal Planner]
Note: This item has been continued from the May 1,2014 CCPC meeting:
B. PUDZ-A-PL20120002906: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier
County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning
classification of the herein described real property from a project previously known as the Buckley
Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to a Commercial Use Planned Unit Development
(CPUD) which will continue to be known as the Buckley PUD, to allow a maximum of 239
residential units, with no requirement for workforce housing units and up to a maximum of 162,750
square feet of gross floor space of retail, office and services uses, including permissible and conditional
uses in the C-1, C-2 and C-3 zoning districts. The subject property is located at the northwest
quadrant of the intersection of Airport-Pulling Road (CR 31) and Orange Blossom Drive in
Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 21.7+/- acres;
providing for the repeal of Ordinance Number 05-05, the former Buckley MPUD; and by providing an
effective date. (Companion to Petition PL2012-2909 CP-2013-3) [Coordinator: Kay Deselem, Principal
Planner]
Note: This item has been continued from the April 17,2014 CCPC meeting:
C. PL20130002249/CPSS-2013-2: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management
Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use
Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, by reconfiguring the boundary and increasing the
size of the Northeast quadrant of Mixed Use Activity Center No. 7 by 9.24 acres(Rattlesnake Hammock
Road and Collier Boulevard. The Subject property is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard
(C.R.951),approximately 1,005 feet north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road extension,in Section 14,
Township 50 South,Range 26 East,consisting of 9.24 acres; and furthermore recommending transmittal
of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for
severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion to CU-PL20130002241 &RZ-PL0001652)
[Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,AICP,Principal Planner]
Note: This item has been continued from the April 17,2014 CCPC meeting:
D. RZ-PL20130001652: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida
amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which
established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,Florida,
by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the
herein described real property from Commercial Intermediate (C-3) and Heavy Commercial (C-5)
zoning districts to a General Commercial(C-4) zoning district, for property located on the east side of
Page 2 of 3
Collier Boulevard (C.R 951) north of Rattlesnake-Hammock Road (C.R. 864) in Section 14,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 18.95+/- acres; providing for
repeal of Ordinances 99-84, 00-75, 02-26, 03-31 and 04-23; and by providing an effective date.
(Companion to CU-PL20130002241 and PL20130002249/CPSS-2013-2, Collier Boulevard Commercial
Properties) [Coordinator:Nancy Gundlach,AICP, PLA,Principal Planner]
Note: This item has been continued from the Apri117,2014 CCPC meeting:
E. CU-PL20130002241: A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida
providing for the establishment of a Conditional Use to allow motor freight transportation and
warehousing (4225, air conditioned and mini-and self storage warehousing only) within a General
Commercial (C-4) Zoning District pursuant to Section 2.03.03.D.1.c.21 of the Collier County Land
Development Code for property located on the east side of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) north of
Rattlesnake-Hammock Road (C.R. 864) in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida. (Companion to RZ-PL20130001652 and PL20130002249/CPSS-2013-2, Collier
Boulevard Commercial Properties) [Coordinator:Nancy Gundlach,AICP,PLA,Principal Planner]
F. CU-PL20130001768: Marco 41 Park,a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County,
Florida providing for the establishment of a conditional use to allow Food stores with greater than 5,000
square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups 5411-5499); Permitted food service
(5812, eating places)uses with more than 6,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure;
and Permitted personal services, video rental or retail uses (excluding drug stores — 5912) with more
than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure, within a Commercial Intermediate
(C-3) zoning district pursuant to subsection 2.03.03.C.1.c of the Collier County Land Development
Code for property located on the north side of U.S. 41,east of the Collier Boulevard(C.R. 951)and
U.S. 41 intersection, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
[Coordinator:Nancy Gundlach,AICP,RLA, Principal Planner]
G. PUDA-PL20140000342: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida amending Ordinance No. 07-71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential
Planned Unit Development(RPUD),to approve the excavation and off-site hauling of 1,050,000 cubic
yards of fill; to increase the size of the preserve tract and add permitted uses; to amend the RPUD
Master Plan and to provide for amendments to list of Developer Commitments; and providing an
effective date. The subject property is located one mile north of U.S. 41 and 1-1/2 miles east of
Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida
consisting of 688+/-acres. [Coordinator:Nancy Gundlach,AICP,RLA,Principal Planner]
H. PL20130001109/CPSP-2013-6: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing 2011
Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Based Amendments to the Collier County Growth
Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, to fix glitches related to changes in the 2011 Ear-
Based Amendments and to revise format, structure and language for internal consistency specifically
amending the Capital Improvement Element; Transportation Element; Conservation and Coastal
Management Element; Recreation and Open Space Element; the Future Land Use Element and Future
Land Use Map and Map Series; the Stormwater Management (Drainage) Sub-Element of the Public
Facilities Element; and furthermore recommending transmittal of these amendments to the Florida
Department of Economic Opportunity. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,AICP,Principal Planner]
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. ADJOURN
CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp
Page 3 of 3
COMPANION ITEMS
q PL2o13000224q/GPSS-2013 -z
q RZ- PL20130001652
q E CU- PL20130002241
WERE CONTINUEP FROM APRIL 17
TO MAY 15 ANP THEN FURTHER
CONTINUEP TO THE JUNE 5 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA ITEM 9-F
5Je9ty
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING& ZONING DEPARTMENT, GROWTH MANAGEMENT
DIVISION
HEARING DATE: MAY 15, 2014
SUBJECT: CU-PL20130001768, MARCO 41 PARK
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Owner:
CSC Properties, LLC Mutual of Omaha
5795 Ulmerton Road, Suite 200 302 North Dale Mabry Highway, Suite 300
Clearwater,FL 33760 Tampa, FL 33609
Agents:
Mr. Fred Hood Mr. R. Bruce Anderson
Davidson Engineering Roetzel & Andres Law Firm
4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 850 Park Shore Drive, Third Floor
Naples,FL 34104 Naples,FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for a
conditional use to allow Food stores with greater than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area in the
principal structure (groups 5411-5499); Permitted food service (5812, eating places) uses with
more than 6,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure; and Permitted personal
services, video rental or retail uses (excluding drug stores — 5912) with more than 5,000 square
feet of gross floor area in the principal structure, within a Commercial Intermediate (C-3)zoning
district pursuant to subsection 2.03.03.C.1.c of the Collier County Land Development Code
(LDC).
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject 5.98± acre parcel is located on the north side of U.S. 41, approximately 350± east of
the intersection of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) and Tamiami Trail East (US 41), in Section 3,
Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map on the
following page.)
CU-PL20130001768,MARCO 41 PARK
April 22,2014
Page 1 of 11
/ /
♦a
41ki 4'040
ii��iii��
O
Q p
U. i �f�a+ ,i ■1
44ii
1 iii`i �J.ir ,nr
,
U1 1 i u
1 0 i
R y Z
-1_______„...L. 0
*fa E-dSli N
r, ® �� gig ac) ao gym. .mm
Q I
a VII1
co
I <, /1/1A 0
III■ 4
A.-‘ A! E•
,,,
J
a
1Ms o<ION / 7
U
Jr
i---, 1 ii / 1
a
a.
rrz J
(�U $ fig,'' Q
4 1 i 2 g ill n 3 6 J
� ��` Qrwarso.rat \ , gFgi S h ,
• � rl r� ill fl 0
N i s:
7A . i I� -
,..°11.81
terra,
g U
u ski F g @q s o
: 3
4131 ARM. �� C
Al IE 11 w rill ftil
fir.,r.,_,y.Ftm,Gn'IR•<%.,a1r'I,,,,,.•.4.M-„,..,•r,,,,,,,,rv•,_:4..,-:;.-s..1<,rro I<HCPI PI 1L.••e.„■••V,(.ear•:♦.1',76..<'!:•
,I CVS DRUG STORE
10'TYPE'A< .P EXISTING C-3ST ZONING
LANDSCAPE
BUFFER / 15'SIDE YARD SETBACK
4 J-11 . 4 .,........_. ......:.:.:.,Fi .:.:.: ....... I
_......„\\
m I p •
` fa < em
• ♦ 0 • •
• ••
<•••< •Z
D p •
< m I Ze o Tc <
•
• •<� < •I7ji ' D
m ` `
` •
M • f • f •5 < • r « • f
II
' ' + I
1 • • « 1., i •CO
s = C ca � • ! f < L e f •i • •
•W • f f •
I j ' ••<•< <•< < <f.f< •<< I
<
IC 1 r f ♦ • 15•I T I I iri I �.. .y� S• -l1■ / ••• • • •`• ••• — In•
' I ' _. <• 9 I m
• j a' ��. • .`•`•`• m
t A i t �� ��l •< 3 _\c c F,i _ 80m •` •••• tI xi
;tai , ) y�c
•• •
O , - r •f••� ' •• ```<• ` 2
•I , ,
{ I t 1 1„ a , � g f • • m co
I j IO `'"N • m F•� I O
1 } ' I IZ mom, �..•. yf ••' I m
1 I -0 COs O m a•f•• • 0 . -I
fit •
I si
i 1tn� In \ 8om r< b c
•I : I>4 OZ <.<• f< I o
j IT •I T�'ry < - n
{i I i ,, 1■ I F
` • *•• f••
4 1 •`F— • • < I G
\ ;p � fiII y • r
• C
•
<• f •
I E • • ` a
°o° . • • f CO
ozm \ f ff I
jD m \ < `
f 4
I 0
1001.1 N Iy266) I , I O
T I < ■
ID(A O j __� _�i o
171 S>y I I 1 1 ^A,� 15 SIDE YCARD I 6
'I I +c, LANDSCAPE BUFFER I 6,
o o m I •(SEE NOTE) -g g o I i m
�D(�rnOV ( Czv
�'1� � I I 3OA
p rn n I m N 7
Xnmd0 I \ x
��'?v I I I Z I >
c) I I I
-CI 2 m ) j I x
m P I I N
o < I I o j F
il 0
-- —� rnocr. - - aN REnotiii
l to v ecenrs raw /,r mom ww memos
MARCO 41 PARK CONDITIONAL USE 1 0(°10"°°1"' c �6^^ '• ” "^Cow.,•
> CSC PROPERTIES,LLG. -�7i.V� -a I t•� __
[] .T 61YEWERIR•ROAM .r.GOn -:11�z7aJ _.—.Awl TOM I • gF wcalsoar
•7x14.11•44 SW.M .1RWfTIR,FL WO,
4 ^....,4.._.. --
W ♦ M�� CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN !KKK O. -
6,6641444•6 F.
i
I
x f\M1-.f...11r'!.n rl.uc::.J.r\d,:`i•.e.-x`.wr 1.:.v:iw`z..v.:..i.:.f`.N:11.,n..�x.J,'".I.-n..It•f..wx M1':•^kl fui r.,rn n4. i x••4 1r:enrM+e i•.:<r-I:;v..
Cn D D Cu -1 Up -A Z C) D 0 -1 * mm -n -I m O --i Z 27 0 o Co A 0
1 C C X C zm2AO � -o00mpa 03 ?c r- Om0 �1m D m '0 oy ' m
O - < - AC � -� z � zm =_ O m jJ
E c x 0 X > � G) rn rlr= -Ammco0rn0 o C mvei om m = m H c m •- m Z
t m O m Z Zoo mm com � Kc1A '71 -im � nnmX < 5:-J Z w m m
E r -zi m -A Z � O nCCo2, ZZZmOo m u) U1 � A__ -1 � m ° AAp D
D D N Z � ?sm -i -11 " Cr) D -ZiO �. Dm �" ZpZ `I7 O
1 o z N O 0 • z(-) o0m00 ' m m -� c� Dp X m D °c0) m
C D O z mA G mrnz - < ° Z -0 D O0 = Crz m z 0 XcoD Z 5.1 cn c z O A � m � z � v -im O p � nm � r, -Di �, m z = O
1 �' m o � ZZmrtm > c>0sccn :Cl mm x -11T wm �7 D ADD Fl
m A - -1 < 5Oo2 _A -1 m CD N) Pp m s -1
�? umiczi -< UDm � oc0 --i-imX 0 � o � r0n � D � p � mx
B X m n 0 cam.) w 0 = 0 -o � C � ➢ `c1mrz Z7 0n) NmrA- mm 0 `-° X -0zK
1 m A A K C7 n ymmmzm,, � � mD ° � m A � WAm � A A m ADZ
D Z z c -1 -D < A m Cn z 8 iD D rn < Z °>
fAf7 C= A 20D_I � A -tD � mDZD rn
rn Q ° cD. x -<<0> - fix, m mom
D 5 p D 70 -1czzm =iomrm2p ° c Z D = mrnC En 0 e. H mmrn
-0-1 Z < 0 n � o " z > > m -qm > * m -. ?") AmmCn C II AA
AC) _ O
-1 O mz � -Apmzc) ommrm ' � mr ° z ;p no
e D O o 00A1m0 0m0ZrA to0O 0 m0 m m m0Z
o cn rn =i 0) -160 = Dmlpmm c � ° m � mmz 0 cnco0
n
m c Co ° = ACmr i !HJ C7 mm m Z OD mDS Z =ice 73 -1rnmW -1 OZ m m �nccoH
C1) Omcn � omzcAnZmm < a) 0mccn
I
cn K r z m 7:1 m m K ID ' 0 -1 D -0 -o 5 c r
� z m m p z z z F- < ° < m x A m Z
f 0c z s° M c c c c Z m D o m A
-I
C
c to 00 m
= rn
� � o O CJ O m A c D m
z o co o A m D c
m
-< z C H m j K Z m m m K
D 1 1 I m -� A C� z
, co 1 H5 -< 0 Z A D cn
rrr c K
z z 1+ I+ 1+ F:
cn w � o o D
z m -.I D Co — m ccr∎ co X
O O CO cn 0 0 n 0 n n m
r r m n •
m c D O Cn
n o O o
O � O -I O T� 7 ° 0 m K en
Z O H D m D K m S C m A i+ 1+ i+ I+
0 n) m = Z = z m m D - n CR N o CO O
Z m m cn m � n D o 0 co c -n
. = m cm ?' 0 =1
m m r A m
-1 -I
F M 70
y
3
t
1
1
g
€ .
y > mo<cr. REN910N5 ..
R l aiwr ry77�17 SNWPSWIR:rd al rtrs
W 5 r MARCO 41 PARK CONDITIONAL USE - f:xl 7icic �+.[aIi':f oaaRns
CSC PROMISES,LLC. a ,RR w a I♦Ks,.,wr
8MR nu 5%IkUIERiO SOPO KA s RR OV/W/Is rrOse ono co.,
IT y�/�(�� SUilim RMS' RR OV P4 I{KNtll S1M111 REgRSt ii' u.s41 CIL�fhYATER.f4af]eu r
CO P,•••mr CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ...or., ��
1
I.
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The purpose of the subject Conditional Use is to allow certain land uses to have increased square
footages for buildings in the C-3 zoning district which are larger than the 5,000 and 6,000 square
foot limitation. The petitioner has requested the removal of the 5,000 and 6,000 square footage
cap for the following land uses on the subject property:
- Conditional Use# 10: Food stores with greater than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area
in the principal structure (groups 5411-5499).
- Conditional Use# 16: Permitted food service (5812, eating places) uses with more than
6,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure.
- Conditional Use # 17: Permitted personal services, video rental or retail uses (excluding
drug stores - 5912) with more than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal
structure.
As previously stated, the subject 5.98± acre site is located on the north side of Tamiami Trail
East (US 41). The subject site is currently cleared and has a 1.68 preservation area in the north
and west portions of the site. To the north of the site is Falling Waters Beach Resort, a multi-
family residential development. To the east of the site is an undeveloped parcel zoned C-5. To
the south of the site is Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and then the undeveloped Tamiami Crossing
CPUD (Commercial Planned Unit Development). To the west of the site is an undeveloped
parcel owned by ABC Liquors and a parcel developed with a CVS Store; these parcels have a
zoning designation of C-3 ST (Commercial Intermediate zoning district within a Special
Treatment area).
The Site Plan provides for a 15-foot wide Type B landscape buffer with a wall along the north
property line. Where there is no preserve area to act as a buffer on the subject site, a minimum
of a 10-foot wide Type A buffer will be provided along the east and west property lines. A 20-
foot wide Type D landscape buffer will be provided along Tamiami Trail East (US 41), and
where there is a right-of–way taking,the landscape buffer will be reduced to 10 feet.
The proposed development is subject to the following LDC C-3 Site Data as shown in the
following chart:
Required:
Min.Lot Area 10,000 s.f.
Min. Lot Width 75'
Max. Zoned Bldg.Height 50'
Min. Ground Floor Area 700 s.f.
CU-PL20130001768,MARCO 41 PARK
April 22,2014
Page 5 of 11
Required:
Min. Front Yard Setback 50%of bldg.height,but not less than 25'
Min. Side Yard Setback 50%of bldg. height,but not less than 15'
Min. Rear Yard Setback 50%of bldg.height,but not less than 15'
Open Space , Not Applicable
The Conceptual Site Plan submitted meets all of the above Site Data requirements. However,
according to the applicant, there is no specific end user at this time. The site plan is conceptual
and the final building configuration is unknown. The size of the buildings and development
standards based on building size on the final Site Development Plan (SDP) may accordingly
deviate from Exhibit "B" of the Resolution, provided that conditions of Exhibit "C" of the
Resolution are otherwise met.
The project shall meet the following Conditions of Approval which have been incorporated into
Exhibit"C"of the attached resolution:
1. This Conditional Use approval does not constitute approval of a subdivision. The buildings
may be placed on one 5.98 acre site under common ownership or the property may be
subdivided in accordance with the LDC.
2. No building, for a use which would otherwise have been limited to 5,000—6,000 square feet
or less, shall be larger than 15,000 square feet."
3. No adult oriented sales are permitted in this project.
4. Outdoor music and televisions shall be limited to the area adjacent to and forward of the front
facades of the buildings along East Tamiami Trail(US 41). There will be no amplified sound
between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m.
5. Delivery hours shall be limited to the hours between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.
6. The trip generation cap is 435 unadjusted,two-way,p.m.peak hour trips.
The subject site was previously rezoned from Rural Agriculture (A) and Commercial
Convenience with a special treatment overlay (C-2ST) to C-3 on June 28, 2005. (See attached
Ordinance 05-35.) The Rezoning Ordinance had several conditions including the construction of
a wall and landscaping adjacent to Falling Waters Beach Resort, fair share contribution to
intersection improvements at the intersection of US 41 and Collier Boulevard, a cross access
easement between properties, and the prohibition of buildings within 60 feet of the rear
(northeast) property line. The Rezoning Ordinance along with its associated conditions will
continue to remain in effect regardless of the subject Conditional Use.
To date,no letters of objection or support have been received.
CU-PL20130001768, MARCO 41 PARK
April 22,2014
Page 6 of 11
SURROUNDING LAND USE& ZONING:
SUBJECT PARCEL: The site is currently vacant, in the C-3 (Commercial Intermediate)zoning
district
SURROUNDING:
North Multi-family residences with a zoning designation of Falling Waters
Beach Resort PUD(Planned Unit Development)
East: An undeveloped commercial parcel and then a developed commercial
parcel with a zoning designation of C-5 (Heavy Commercial)
South: Tamiami Trail East (US 41), and then undeveloped land with a zoning
designation of Tamiami Crossing CPUD (Commercial Planned Unit
Development)
West: A parcel developed with a CVS Drugstore and an undeveloped parcel
with a proposed ABC Liquor Store with a zoning designation of C-3ST
(Commercial Intermediate within a Special Treatment area)
ibLY
au
•
g Y _
`` '• ,� , Subject Site
j .e ✓ �
i
•
Aerial
CU-PL20130001768,MARCO 41 PARK
April 22,2014
Page 7 of 11
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN(GMP)CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban
designated area (Urban — Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict —
Activity Center #18), as identified on the countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this request, the purpose and intent of the C-3 district is
to provide for a wider variety of goods and services intended for areas expected to receive a
higher degree of automobile traffic. The type and variety of goods and services are those that
provide an opportunity for comparison shopping, have a trade area consisting of several
neighborhoods, and are preferably located at the intersection of two arterial-level streets. The
Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict allows C-1 through C-5 and the requested added uses are
permitted as conditional uses within C-3 zoning districts of the Land Development Code (LDC).
Therefore the petition request is consistent with the FLUE of the GMP.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding area. Please refer
to the"Analysis"section below.
Transportation Element: The Transportation Services Department has reviewed the Traffic
Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient
capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject
application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP.
Based on the above analysis, staff finds the requested conditional uses consistent with the
Growth Management Plan.
ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to LDC Section 10.08.00 D., before any Conditional Use recommendation can be
offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC)must make findings that: 1)approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the
public interest and will not adversely affect other property of uses in the same district of the
neighborhood; and 2)all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use have been met
by the petitioner; and 3) satisfactory provisions and arrangements have been made concerning
the following matters,where applicable:
I. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management
Plan(GMP).
This request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and this project will be
in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code(LDC).
2. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,traffic flow and control,
and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
CU-Pt.20130001768,MARCO 41 PARK
April 22,2014
Page 8 of 11
Existing ingress and egress to the subject property is provided by four points. One is located
along Tamiami Trail East (US 41). The other is through a cross access easement to the west
through the CVS parcel that provides a second ingress and egress to Tamiami Trail East(US
41) and to a third ingress and egress to Collier Boulevard (SR 951). The forth point is
through an access easement to the east that provides a forth ingress and egress to Tamiami
Trail East(US 41). There is a sidewalk along Tamiami Trail East(US 41).
3. The affect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to
noise, glare,economic or odor effects.
The purpose and intent of the C-3 limit of 5,000 square feet of gross floor area is that these
land uses generally have a greater impact in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects.
However,these impacts can be addressed as part of the conditional use process.
The subject site is surrounded by developed and undeveloped commercial to the east and
west, along with undeveloped commercial to the south. The Conditional Use will have a
minimal impact on these neighboring commercial properties in relation to noise, glare,
economic or odor effects.
However, there are multi-family residences to the north. The proposed Conditions of
Approval limiting the size of the development, outdoor sound and delivery hours along with
the required Type B Landscape Buffer will insure that the Conditional Uses will have
minimal impact on neighboring properties in relation to glare, economic or noise effects.
4. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district.
If the proposed Conditions of Approval are adopted, the proposed retail land uses can be
found compatible with adjacent properties and other properties in the immediate area. As
previously stated, the subject property is located between two commercial properties on a
principal arterial road.
Based on the above findings,this conditional use is recommended for approval.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The applicant duly noticed and held the required meeting on February 12, 2014, at 5:30 p.m. at
the East Naples Public Library, located at 8787 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. According
to a head count performed by Staff, approximately 35 to 40 people along with the applicant
attended the meeting. For further information,please see the NIM Minutes(Attachment C).
The meeting ended at approximately 6:25 p.m.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for CU-PL20130001768 revised on
April 22,2014.
CU-PL20130001768, MARCO 41 PARK
April 22,2014
Page 9 of 11
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition CU-
PL20130001768 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval
subject to the following conditions:
1. This Conditional Use approval does not constitute approval of a subdivision. The buildings
may be placed on one 5.98 acre site under common ownership or the property may be
subdivided in accordance with the LDC.
2. No building for a use which would otherwise have been limited to 5,000— 6,000 square feet
or less shall be larger than 15,000 square feet."
3. No adult oriented sales are permitted in this project.
4. Outdoor music and televisions shall be limited to the area adjacent to and forward of the front
facades of the buildings along East Tamiami Trail (US 41). There will be no amplified sound
between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m.
5. Delivery hours shall be limited to the hours between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.
6. The trip generation cap is 435 unadjusted,two-way,p.m.peak hour trips.
CU-PL20130001768,MARCO 41 PARK
April 22,2014
Page 10 of 11
PREPARED BY:
Y141vW r 1411 t20t'NANCY G1Ir LA H, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE
GROWTH u�A NA6EMENT DIVISION
REVIEWED BY:
1c7- 4 lit-. 14-
RAYMON 9 . BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE
GROWTH %ANAGEMENT DIVISION
7 2 ) )
MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
APPROVED BY:
/7)V "/
NICK CAIALANGU iitA4": MINISTRATOR DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Attachments:
Attachment A: Proposed Resolution
Attachment B: Ordinance 05-35
Attachment C: NIM Minutes
CU-PL20130001768,MARCO 41 PARK
April 14,2014
Page 11 of 11
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-
i
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLI:SHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW FOOD
STORES WITH GREATER TIIA:N 5;000 SQUARE FEET OF' GROSS
FLOOR AREA IN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE (GROUPS 5411-
5499); PERMITTED FOOD SERVICE (5812, EATING PLACES) USES
WITH MORE THAN 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR
AREA IN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE; AND PERMITTED
PERSONAL SERVICES, VIDEO RENTAL OR RETAIL USES
(EXCLUDING DRUG STORES — 5912) WITH MORE THAN 5,000
SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA 1N THE PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE, WITHIN A COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE (C-3)
ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.03A3.C.1.c OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND. DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.
[PETITION CU-1 L20130001.768}
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida,
and Chapter 125, Florida. Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish,
coordinate arid enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of
the public; and. ,.
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development. Code
(O.rdinance. No. 2004 41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses;and
\\1-IEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), being the duly appointed and
constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as
in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use
to allow food stores with greater than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal
structure.(groups 5411-5499); permitted food service.(5.812, eating places) uses with more than
6,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure; and permitted personal services,
video rental or retail uses (excluding drug stores 5912) with more than 5,000 square feet of
gross floor area in, the principal structure, within a Commercial Intermediate (C-3) Zoning
Marco Pak 41\CU-PL20 130O0176h 1 of 3
Rev.429/14
Attachment A
District pursuant to Subsection 2,03,03.C.l.c of the Collier County Land Development Code on
the property hereinafter described, and: the Collier County P..lanning Commission has made
findings that the granting of the Conditional.Use will not adversely affect the public interest and
the specific requirements governing the Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory
provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said.
regulations and in accordance with Subsection 10.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code; and
WI•IEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 13Y THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNI`Y,FLORIDA that
Petition Number CU-PL20130001768 filed by CSC Properties, LI:C with respect to the
property hereinafter described in Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby approved for a
Conditional Use to allow food stores with greater.than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area in the
principal structure (groups 5411-5499); permitted food service (5812, eating places) uses with
more than 6,000 square feet of gross floor area in the principal structure; and permitted personal
services, video rental or retail uses (excluding drug stores— 5912) with more than 5,000 square
feet of gross floor area in the principal structure within a Commercial Intermediate (C-3) Zoning
District pursuant to Subsection 2.03:03,C.1.c of the Collier County Land Development Code, in
accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit "B" and subject to the conditions
found in Exhibit "C". Exhibits "A","B", and "C" are attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Bard.
This Resolution adopted after.motion, second, and super-majority vote, this day of
2014.
ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: By:,
Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING,Chairman
Marco Park 41',.CC1-P1.,20130001768 2 of 3
Rev.4/29/14
C
..... . ........
Approved as to form and legality:
Scott A. Stone
Assistant County Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A- Legal Description
Exhibit -Conceptual Site Plan.
Exhibit C—Conditions of Approval
CP113-CPS-O 1 274/37
Marco Park A t\CU-PL20130001768 3 of 3
Rev.4129114
CAC.
DAVIL3$ON
DE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE. AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY MOST CORNER OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS DESCRIBED AS
"PARCEL 4"AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4380, PAGE 3511 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,THE SAME BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY MOST CORNER OF THOSE CERTAIN.
LANDS DESCRIBED AS"PARCEL 117FEE"AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4901,PAGE 28 OF
SAID PUBLIC RECORDS;THENCE NORTH 35'°34'22" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LAST OF
SAID LANDS,A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO NORTHWESTERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID"PARCEL 117FEE"
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE
NORTH 35°34'22." EAST, ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID"PARCEL 4", A DISTANCE OF 390.00 FEET TO
THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID"PARCEL 4";THENCE SOUTH 54°25'38" EAST, ALONG THE
NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF "PARCEL 4" AND "PARCEL 3",ALL OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
4380, PAGE 3511, A DISTANCE OF 660.000 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER. OF SAID
"PARCEL 3", THENCE SOUTH 35°34'22" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
"PARCEL 34,A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID "PARCEL 3";
THENCE NORTH 54°25'38" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID 'PARCEL 3", A
DISTANCE OF 288.21 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MOST CORNER OF THOSE CERTAIN LANDS
DESCRIBED AS"PARCEL. 118FEE" AND RECORDED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4901, PAGE 28 OF
SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 35°35'42" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID"PARCEL 118FEE" A DISTANCE OF 10.00. FEET TO THE MO ST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID
"PARCEL 118FEE"; THENCE NORTH 54°25'38" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF
SAID "PARCEL 118FEE" AND "PARCEL 117FEE"' A DISTANCE OF 371.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING'260,282 SQUARE FEET OR 5.975 ACRES,MORE.OR LESS..
Marco 41 Park C1'!Altadwint 13
Le!Ell Description wyk ai:tl ii,I!wnenl„iilecriSSg,Ewn
0
;
i [
Exhibit B
i
i CC'S DRUG STORE
i 4D•TYPE'A• . EXISTING C•3ST.ZONING:
LANDSCAPE t,,
BUFFER O; 45'SIDE YARD SETBACK
/
1w •
''me .. , g_T t . , ,
` • II 'i a ;my ._.t f m
P, n fn
•
1
l( :
r 4 r `
in: 1 ,I _t� l fit
j
C t"
o
M
a
-< t i `�•co.
8gv I I pa
o 1 �0 1 C 1, 1 .
_ . i �
• Ay I. tip * 'f ..+
1a pIt x I t m •.. k 1 •- a'
Ib II mNP-7 1 9 1 m
••
' : y u r p 8:
m
• n f• i 1
i
9 2 Z3 r i.,.... �Ep fl
_.. .�Q m `_'ti`s ,}..,,_._.....� S � -t•
l'•
O. -i-* -,IYI0iAhl-m, C�fov MIf_ m INF 1 r-—f 11w-#�1-• p.
( \ � .. .
> ; ♦ 45'31pE YARp v
•
Iv ts,pE?z c I N. .. LANDSCAPE BUFFER I SETBACK o
j���4 (SEE NOTE) 0 o z m.
9 i zv
n y 0.23 a • in
NnlHh �„i..:'- l x N. N
'_ 1 I� ;j
�'o < o €'.
mm0� I lti �: K 11.
p 0 ( I, !. I
1 11
O X,11 I, ,ii
I�-';'t f . I.. J M I :
T SR ..
r771(-------'------1(-77,-; :-::::::77:7-10;;;;:i I a 1 L7w r +Gym rye Tn3 L
, r' #; t MARCO 41 PARK GON1IN Utct+POPfat!ka,GCG I I : w I tFt t y r••Z
+ xt+X : 7 +tiLs� 6 rzaw —` •i Q I V ; 1 L,_11C.-3:-•R -.1<
( 4 '.y L __.�.J, fiLLi Y I 1 Ia f 'i [_4L 'i (.
ClE4MVATEPT A5 Y I� ' �F
C l
I I , M i .
.A.---..j 1, "."."' '11111 111;!■,•,.AtTMAtAZAAIZ-1711111-AAAA1-••.1•If••1•7-A........:1•'-‘7*1--_,) Ito
Page j,_,•ef,. .
Exhibit 13•::
-,., cii•):.o.do -1,cri:-.4 --CZ 0 0.0 .1. .*, M -13. m•-1 13.0--1 : Z 0 18-w )> 0
- •rn m 55 C)---(-0 0 m 0 :.L ' • X r- 0:C.70.-m I > fil -0 .,. 15 r7 m
>c. :"l0-4 z z M 103 = T 7 m.0 m , to 2 7 .
..p. •5.0.nici F= -:4 rrirrn•c,0.111 co -0 IC 65 00 .Es-... •fri'--1 m 7.1 c: M --- 2 z
• 71 TTI --i:73 ??1 z 2.ra. rn Fri = 41 74.32 5 73. 1M ;:i m *..51r„1.C) >< -< -.5 Z T:', _. rn M
rn z. CO•2! 'Z -g.:f.'s'-0 6 ), xv.c.1 ao T-0.2 ill 0 1,-rl. 0) co coH-I, .4 m E9 cn .?›
E:0 cn.Z • -c: 2.rn z 13 I"' Cn m• j.,:i--.. -- lj -...A m _ >
z c a 1,-.Z r-,,_,7...m ,.7.1 -0 0 ,cn , -A 0. I 7) > m c • 2-0 Z 7/ 0 ,..__- O.> x r'
1,4 C) G7) -, -- -.0.-n.0 • •`'. 07 : . - <=•co mi .
0 z 0 Z :CD • -i • Z c)•::1 rn z --: • m z 13 73 .8,s..--1 r-•> i, m rn :0 -A). 0 Z
m .23:- 2•p3 1:0 •••• x• X:c r- m Z •C/1- -
C 0 Z k- Z ' '‹.-C1i 55 --I..4 17 Ci)- -< ,-- - 0. > 7> 'cc,• > (/) •rn 2.i 0
" -4, • _A
CO •c. 2 _0 0 .>:-4; X I-<.. xi,-7, •m 0 0 0. :-.-•to Li m. SVI • .0•> * H
m cn 0 - ...1 .0> rn rn nu'c)-g!'c:5;0 ;P )1›- A•rn * .--1 A 4% < ,, ). X ..i p 7> fil .
M x z-E 1.-1 *• • .'4 0 14 c)" -4•4-14 -0. - ' .--1.6• 17 < m sp. rim rn •
(i) In, r m.0.m ....,m m..5„9, i 73 co 0 t'n.->•_-, > m > rn pD -4
•
coo• . ''' (I) .:''4'. -‹ ° •-r-Z 0(I)'''I M C ii r-- 0 • • iii C 6)-.' -
<r.).• n :• cn.• T H cr 0•):, . rn z _. 0: if ..>xi M. ..-1 " .„,„„. 0.71 .
•R >1:0: t4 •Ga• rn'-4 • M c'm r- **. - r, xi Na NJ•-io r- rn 0 - =1 71 ln 2 R:
co c). -- • °::: 1° 7111.g • 9• i%•):•:73 m 0 • •: > >
6- rn z:-n - .:--1- z 0 13 m >...0 to•m.M. 7J
13- Z Z. M. C 0- -4.."O.- 11 m 2.°0c'73 6 • :rn K• -.- c) > co 53 i5ri, 4-
.-17...5. 0 711- 1 2 m • > ••••• ".-x- 0 m-°rn X X In
• :17, 0
° rn C 23 i: 1 x.• .
I- r"-4...A.1 );4: Z• 0 ! XI -‹0 >. . (..:0
rl 5.? -rn Tn o -.1 c). r- co Z. -7.--I <-,-1 c:,7:1 -M c) z'
•:70 --1 0.z 9.5 0••nm rn c- •a 71: i--, ll m 0 q • •
••m m .4;55 >. c- --..• 1 m
) m z
• _...,0 m rrj,•.C. n- 'g 0.0 'z->>•m•-‘) '' ,-,> :R. i' Ra ,.,. <m„„ c it ' 7,•73. ;- .
.... m v., •- ...,
..:,:t• z ,-,0, 5.- rnZS. 0 0• • 7-f•Z- 70 r--7J " -- rn-
0 c)r-. 6Qm .x
Tri• 0 rn M
c) ),
-A C)
C) in
m
. x
c) (n- rn.„.-=4 0-4 c) C):c >•:c•-o 00-55 • 5:,..= !
M C 0 0 CO.EOC > CO rn.r-.rn r-rn.rn C) ',,-1 C, C) M ."'" M 1.-41 • m
U.
co z: -a E5 -A 0 (2) rn 0 0 m __,A --I •615-
- 17
--I 0 > .cn 0 •.27 0 13 m.z•. m >• :- -7_ z x m bo 77,1 0 rn-
m -- - •
71 0 7 c z -0 •77 0 0<.r-..•-t.0 71
Z Z
---: -I C. Mtn > c---40> X> Onl'i rr
!t X/ U) ln • M)) -0._,.-A r,::75 r-.> fn: -M m >:
co (7-.5 a rn c: 0 g.0---.,•:c E: -“-- .<7)
: 1 20 n1 0.71'r -67 ). .H
> -k-. 111- ' - 70 m
cn 0 m 5 i.: rn i x> zcd ..<
....pm z rn nn: m 0 C) rn 91.•
. .
- > 1-
-t: ,-M
-1 M :•K a) • ,,-,-, --4 0 "V 1-IP : : C•
•-4,__.- >. 10, .>. > i rn •k1" 2. k- g 1M ID• m a3 1 m :co.
xt. -: x,x •00. g': : , •__. __ __ r- I.<: : -4• En 1 ?...3 H ED Z
5›- 1 Xj K gig cz) - 1:rn . p. g. olc m . 0•
0._c !..T: pa: K• i C c •a:1 c -k-• . i r.,..• m 0„.
.g- 'co . 5: .. 1 .- 1 K- C 0 ctn. 0 711",24 -K- • 1
-- i)• <
xt.6' I 0 1 .M .,--i .73 r- , r-- 71 i ■0', --i > M In .A. • (/)
corn_15 1E1 :Hcr' I.• 7,5; M 0.1 0_. r" m 17 M. co . M -,
ci ----i 1 -1.: 0 •1:2• >: co >
IK 7a• m r-1: c 0 • •
.°I •:S- I E.
z ›,
. i >: •
. •co . _ ,..,0. 7.zi =H if71 .T. > > ii• M CO
<7. ..? I .CO- 'cn• tc IZ•• J° 70 •
-, M. - . C
, •m•. - .z : .,- -1 >: ,,, •K
1.,,,i
co 0 4" -r-* .zu, . • K .
-C/) I t • > .
> •C3
73 Cf) •■■•■•
'''( C) Z R:
c
g: .--t
I>
• .. .. 73
0
.._ •01 ,
. 1 z
i.0.
H- If, Fit, 1,4- . .
pi W. •-4 p
- m I 1 ZJ . 1> .4, .. .• im C4 bl 0::
I Z Z ""4 0 I -4 04 cfl L.4 •PD
I 0 0 1X -> -.>.. A- >-• > rn• •
7n 0
1
0 0 IQ) •C): 2 0. 0 g> -cn:
...._.,
, , w• 0 • 0 -4- 0 1 - , -
CI) (fl C)
-,.-
v.,• - X 0 . - I f
I 0.4.4 0:. 4 0: '`,„ • 0- 0 • m.I ,..„
'r CD i t
I I(3/ -TT X 71= M. ,v4: M -o- C 'crl• .
Z i '':'Hi> --S•> M. rn 06 z- • m, ..)0• i 1+-- I+ ! 14-.• H- d .
I Ca N.7'I 11' = Z .•".Z ni- ---!- -rf: 0. :al ..,„ • • 1 cri: ni, ,-, cr.: '1`.•
2 01 1M rrn : X is., _,., D. ..:Es IN) Po ez,. b) 0
1- ni- - im l • 61. m.cr, 01. -n r- :0.I 14:>•• -...i bo. co 71
1...--1 i cc ...n al m E
0 - 'j,.' •g.!piZ. - ,.-i
i • • m
M m 55. I
, ..
1 -I'■.::- .-."`.
: . . . ..
I!•
0..
„
-__,
Cl-o7,77,7rff•piwOc471;I;,=FF4Te"F,r:a4Eve--"----------"I
MA-CO 41 PARK CONDITIONAL USE PascnInnUrims,acATr" 4 414;1"A:NII-WRWM41=----7---.4
.„: r • k_. .,'firemmmoqm:144);, ,,A1,,, 11' i4-60-1-AwsicRrilkiviwizr--`-----4
1: 1- •, .
1 i Vgt r,..1tr,,t - ------, w&E,Zaliff. ...ta:a(201-11tFI EnIE w
CONCEPTUALVTEPUOF t,--"---4-77:::::::-- --77-7771
Page..2..;9f...far., :c./■(.
„.._.
EXHIBIT"C"
Conditions of Approval
I. This Conditional Use approval does not constitute approval of a subdivision, The
buildings may be placed on one 5.98 acre site under common ownership or the
property may be subdivided in accordance with the.LDC.
2. No building,for a use which would otherwise have been limited to 5,000--6,000
square feet or less,shall be larger than 15,000 square feet.
3. No adult oriented sales are permitted in this project.
4. Outdoor music and televisions shall be limited to the area adjacent to and forward of
the front facades of the buildings along East Tamiami'Trail(US 41). There will be no
amplified sound between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m.
5 Delivery hours shall be limited to the hours between 8 a.m.and 6 p.m:.
6. The trip generation cap is 435 unadjusted,two-way,p.m.peak hour trips.
I3•CPS-O 1274/31
4117114
1
(cc011 12 r 3 ,STS ORDINANCE NO.05-- 15
_
I Riot� ii; 41,AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY '
Ci. COMMISSIONERS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-
41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
`�� • • �'i DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE
�QazSL COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULA IONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL
ZONING ATLAS MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF U.S. 41 JUST EAST OF COLLIER3% a
BOULEVARD IN SECTION 03, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,FROM"A"Dr-
s. F_ `T1
RURAL AGRICULTURAL AND "C-2ST" COMMERCIAL,; i
CONVENIENCE WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAYS °1 I--
TO "C-3" COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE FOR RETAIL;,, , = rn
OFFICE, AND RESTAURANT AND OTHER USES SUBJECIt;u: to C3
TO CONDITIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVgy c
DATE. Sr=i ---
WHEREAS, Southern Development Company, Inc., represented by Jeff L. Davidson,
P.E., of Davidson Engineering, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the
zoning classification of the subject real property for Petition No.RZ-2003-AR-496I.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County,Florida,that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the subject real property, more particularly described by
Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, located in Section 03,
Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "A" Rural
Agriculture and "C-2ST" Commercial Convenience with a Special Treatment Overlay to"C-3"
Commercial Intermediate for retail, office, and restaurant and other uses and the appropriate
Official Zoning Atlas Map, as described in Ordinance 04-41,as amended, the Collier County
Land Development Code,is hereby amended accordingly,subject to the following conditions:
• 1. No development orders will be approved, other than to authorize construction of a
required wall and Type"B"buffer adjacent to Falling Waters Beach Resort as set forth
below,until sufficient capacity exists on all affected segments and the intersection of US-
41 and SR-95 I, as may be determined by the County's Concurrency Management
System.
2. In addition to all required transportation impact fees,Developer may be required to make
a proportionate, fair-share payment for required future capacity improvements to the
intersection of US-41 and SR-951, i.e., payment equal to the cost to create sufficient
capacity at that intersection for the traffic impacts created by the development.
3. Prior to any Site Development Plan(SDP)approval,other than to authorize construction
of a required wall and Type "B" buffer adjacent to Falling Waters Beach Resort as set
forth below,access to the adjoining commercial properties shall be provided in the form
of easements granted to adjacent property owners to facilitate cross access between the
•
commercial properties to the east and west of the subject property.
4. A sidewalk shall be constructed along the frontage of the subject property on Tamiami
Page 1 of 2
Attachment B
Trail(U.S.Highway 41)pursuant to LDC Sections 5.05.08.C.4,and 10.02.03.B.1.b.i.xiii.
5. Prior to approval of the development's first SDP,i.e.,other than to authorize construction
of a required wall and Type"B"buffer adjacent to the Falling Waters Beach Resort as set
forth below,the Environmental Advisory Council will review the approved South Florida
Water Management District(SFWMD)permit for mitigation of wetlands impacts.
6. In addition to any other rear yard requirement for this zoning district, no accessory or
principal building may be permitted within sixty-feet of the rear(NE)property line.
7. Owner agrees to construct an eight foot(8')wall ten-feet inside the rear(NE)property
line within 90 days from the date of issuance of the required development permit to
construct the wall that will be uniformly landscaped and irrigated on both sides,as shown
in rendering(Exhibit C), and as otherwise required by the LDC.The wall, landscaping,
and irrigation facilities will be maintained by the property owner.
8. In addition to the otherwise applicable conditioned above, until the required wall,
landscaping, and irrigation facilities are completed, no other building permits may be
issued or approved for Phase HI of the development,i.e.,the subject petition.
9. Any trash enclosures constructed on Phase III,i.e.,the subject petition,will be screened
from view from the Falling Waters Beach Resort property as required by the Land
Development Code(LDC).
SECTION TWO:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this 28th day of June,2005.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA
Iif:Ci Asti BY: W.
""" •,''4, FRED W.COYLE,CHAIRM
ATTES
DWIGHT E.bItO K;l tT LlRK
C, ttes;,a tit'„$Q�:Ch�fnity Clerk
sigatturi
Approved as to form
' and legal sufficiency:
re.i1V4, C0,4)
Patrick G.White
Assistant County Attorney
RZ-2003-AR-4961/MD/cp
This ordir,once fii.:d with rh,
Secretary of Stot,'s Office the
dayof
and ocknowIedge ent of that
filing received fhis 11+?1 do
of y
„ .
o.ou�v er.,e
Page 2 of 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF NOTTH%OF SECTION3,TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY,FLORIDA,AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 3:
FROM THE EAST' CORNER OF SECTION 3,RUN WITH SECTION LINE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 41
MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 612.57 FEET;THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 18
MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 722.35 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE
WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY DRAINAGE CANAL WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD#90(TAMIAMI TRAIL);THENCE WITH SAID TRAIL RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 2647.51
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE TRAIL RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 440
FEET;THENCE NORTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 400.00
FEET;THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST,A DISTANCE OF 440
FEET;THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 400.00
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 4:
CERTAIN LANDS SITUATED IN THE NW'/OF SECTION 3,TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH,RANGE 26
EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,STATE OF FLORIDA;FROM THE NE CORNER OF SAID
NW'4,RUN WITH THE SECTION LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 23 MINUTES 53
SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 324.27 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE
ROAD#951;THENCE WITH SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 8
SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 1252.72 FEET TO ITS JUNCTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE STATE ROAD#90;THENCE WITH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD
#90 SOUTH 24 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 69.99 FEET AND
SOUTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 379.38 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE NORTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST A
DISTANCE OF 400 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST A
DISTNACE OF 220 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST A
SISTANCE OF 400 FEET;THENCE NORTH 54 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST A
SISTANCE OF 220 FEET TO THE PIONT OF BEGINNING.
CONTANINING APPROXIMATELY 6.07 ACRES
EXHIBIT"A"
I Z
y.
I
Q E." ° 1al lit
MD fl IIII 1 A \ u)
l
ii
'ill
.414-0-•
t o It '` i, ■
..i. rli w I 1 i:14.!-,■ vF
JJ)) tea ..
O
in
I
J
a 'II 11;1-1 t Y I■■
v
•
I (i o DO i 4 15% !Mg It d I: 1 I Ii'g
Z tr W!a II 43 -21
o
�� IIII11 1 K m �zuia
Ari\\ Z W I zE" x- )1 •.—•irc !f � i s I ( :II!J ■.. ,., 1 w HrjHHj ■ : 111-t f Z::
N
d- r ji i a`
It t I 99 !11!II .
V s0
I ', ,,, jIj
t y ` ^
•
r� Inl h r
w g
J 0� aY ONINOZ 1SC-O ONLLSIX3 iii i %114 dilliq 4;! Ri 11
x a • 321015 On210 SnO 1%44'N I p (j "'1°hr pp Ili if! 1 g 9 ?
• Q�4 ` iii Il`i ,41 Ili y° S4- iili! 1 il I 4i 1 8g r' 119 ri1.1 i
7'41101 itg&41i 11 n : b it '2 1.' lieleinolli 4 , nt j lg I lallit .z1 1, 0,: J- i i ply �a"'c
4-I iiiiii . �31 1: : i o o Z
+ �, 4-' d1 Oho
U
`r l IrI ! z
Li! i I
I I \ y
127 w PtLA• CWL cu7 GPZauvn,w'■ P\!AR•GY wue ay my.uJw
a szszxxa +
•
..J.
•
1!.1'
•
• ."Irli
j�a
•
til
.}. 41' g
:;.tai
.i 5T.E
.1!{
l!1.
N
;z
r
• lr)1 -
-zJ
vi
•
,c1.. ;:.::.,.,,4
'.b:1:.:7"zii..'i.l.'' .
• v,
:� Q a
z
•
O _jai
'j ¢ 3
^ i x
z
s km-
•
-.1
Td WtiZTl seen e2 'ter • bT80 ESE Tb6 : *ON xti.A e-SU '1-10f103U1S 11 3kS : "W
•
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby
certify that the foregoing is a true copy of:
ORDINANCE NO. 2005-35
Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on
the 28th day of June 2005, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 5th day
of July 2005 .
DWIGHT E. BROCK
'Clerk of Courts and Clerk
Ex-officio ,to Board of _
County Commig, '',}lers
/C....,- - „ ,,...90,aketaik0Q_
-t°6t- .
By: Heidi' R. Rockhold,
:'Deputy Clerk
1
is
DAVIDSON ___............� .__.. _.
N �'�F C N< 4365 Radio Road,Suite 201 • Naples,FL 34104 • P: (239) 434.6060 1: (239) 434.6084
w rw.davidsonengmtering.com
M E M O R A N D U M
March 28,2014
TO: Nancy Gundlach,AICP, PLA
FROM: Tim Hancock, AICP
RE: Marco 41 Park- PL20130001768
NIM Meeting Notes
A Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at the East
Naples Public Library, located at 8787 Tamiami Trail East. The meeting was properly advertised
and started at 5:30 pm. A total of 27 individuals attended, based on the attached sign in sheet. In
addition,the following individuals were present:
• Nancy Gundlach,Principal Planner, Collier County
• Tim Hancock, AICP,Davidson Engineering
• Bruce Anderson, Roetzel and Andress
Tim Hancock opened the meeting by introducing himself as the Consultant for the project. He
then introduced Nancy Gundlach,as the Planner with Collier County and explained the application
process. Nancy Gundlach then introduced herself and thanked Tim for putting together the
meeting. She explained the purpose of her attendance to the meeting and made her contact
information available for all attendees. Tim explained that the meeting was being recorded,that a
copy of the meeting audio would be sent to the County for record and explained that any
commitments made in the meeting would be met.
Tim then asked which attendees were from Falling Waters. He noted most of the Falling Water
residents were probably familiar with the site and discussed the previous project,known as Home
Center Plaza. Tim used a Site Map and Aerial to show the project location and explained the C-3
zoning and what that zoning designation allows for. Tim then explained that the project went into
foreclosure and informed the attendees of the new owner; Mutual of Omaha Bank. He then
explained that Mutual of Omaha Bank put the property up for sale and is now under a Contract for
Purchase with CSC Properties, located out of Clearwater, Florida. He explained the sale was
contingent upon the Rezone Petition being approved.
Tim went into detail on the C-3 zoning designation and explained that ninety-five (95) uses are
allowed within the C-3 zoning district and that of the ninety-five(95) uses,three(3)of them have
square footage caps. He went over those uses; first being the food store limited to 5,000 sq ft,the
second being restaurants at 6,000 sq ft and lastly personal services/retail being capped at 5,000 sq
Page 1 of 6
Attachment C
•
ft. Tim explained that a shopping center could be built with no such caps on these uses,but since
conceptually they are individual and free-standing buildings that the square footage cap must be
met. He explained the purpose of this Rezone Petition is to have the square footage cap lifted to
allow for a smaller number of buildings with larger square footages. He then told the attendees
about a recent site plan he worked on for Cheddars,noting that the square footage for that particular
restaurant was 7,900 sq ft. He mentioned that most of the larger chain sit-down restaurants have
over a 6,000 sq ft requirement. Tim then explained that the Rezone Petition is also requesting the
5,000 sq ft cap for retail be lifted. Tim explained a small-scale food store may go in and assured
the site could not accommodate the larger chain grocers, like Publix,needing around 55,000 sq ft.
Tim then used a site map to show the location of the existing preserve and said it would remain in
its location,between the project and the Falling Waters site.
Tim made the attendees aware that there was no certainty in what businesses were actually going
to be on the site at this point. He explained that when the sale for the property was final, that
contracts could then be made with potential buyers and it would be for the three separate parcels
with three separate buildings. Tim then used a Conceptual Site Plan to show the location and sizes
of the three(3)proposed buildings.
Question asked:
An Attendee asked the size of the existing Tractor Supply. Tim responded that the Tractor Supply
building to be 22,670 sq ft.
Tim goes on to show the Conceptual Site Plan, clearly showing the developable area, water
management area and preserve area.
Question asked:
One Attendee spoke up and asked if there would be a lake. Tim responded there would not be a
lake, due to size constraints on the site and that there would be a dry detention area for water
management. Tim also explained that the water management would be permitted through South
Florida Water Management District.
Tim proceeded with telling the attendees that the restaurant that would be built would be limited
to outdoor music and televisions on the front of the building,away from Falling Waters, and also
be limited to outdoor music and televisions until 10:00 pm. He explained it would be a"trade-
off" for allowing the sq footage cap being lifted. Tim then added that the Developer would be
required to bring the site up to code. He explained when a Development Order is issued, the
Developer would have a certain amount of time to finish the wall and install the required
landscaping and irrigation.
Question asked:
A few Attendees then spoke up about the wall's construction not being completed and the location
of where the wall currently ends. Tim used the Site Plan to show the location of the wall's proposed
length and told Attendees that a CO would not be issued until all code requirements were met.
Tim proceeded with explaining that the idea of the Rezone is to make the property more marketable
to the larger, national companies.
Questions asked:
An Attendee spoke up and stated that there are a several empty store fronts in the area. Tim replied
that the national companies are now purchasing and building and back in the market.
An Attendee used the Site Map to ask Tim if a hearing would be required if a C-S parcel were to
be developed. Tim replied that the C- 5 parcel was currently under contract with our client and
that a hearing would not be required for the parcel and then again explained the request of the
Rezone Petition, not increasing building height or intensity.
An Attendee asked where the parking will be located. Tim used the Site Plan and Aerial to show
entrance and parking locations.
An Attendee asked if a traffic light would be installed. Tim replied a traffic light was not
anticipated to his knowledge. He used the Site Plan to again show entrances and the existing
Access Easement beginning at CVS.
An Attendee asked if there would be limits on the site lighting. She brought up that the Tractor
Supply's site lighting was lighting up Falling Waters. Tim replied that the County has a code on
Commercial property's site lighting "spilling"over onto residential sites. He made the Attendees
aware that the Collier County Code Enforcement could investigate violations of the Code. He
further explained cut-off shields and other methods of reducing the illumination of site lighting.
An Attendee spoke up concerned about restaurant trash, stating there are bears in the area. Tim
replied that the sites would have dumpster enclosures with lockable gates.
An Attendee asked if there will be restrictions on how late the proposed businesses would be open.
Tim replied that they would following County Codes and in addition are willing to agree to keep
outdoor entertainment and television to the front of the store and not past 10:00pm. He also
explains that the County has a Noise Ordinance.
An Attendee asks the time frame on the project. Tim explained the Plat being proposed and
estimated about one year before any vertical construction would happen.
An Attendee then asks the timeframe on the construction of the wall. Tim then explained that the
wall would need to be complete prior to the issuance of CO.
An Attendee asked the proposed building height. Tim responded that the allowable building height
in the C-3 zoning district is 50 ft but realistically there would not be any 3 story buildings due to
the proposed uses of Retail and Restaurant.
An Attendee stated there are a lot of empty stores at the Town Center and asked why retailers
would want to build at the proposed location. Tim explained everyone has their own niche and
reasons for wanting to buy in the location they are proposing.
Tim then used the Site Plan and Aerial Map to show the location of the proposed entrance, per
request of an Attendee. He also shows the location of the access easement.
Questions asked:
An Attendee asked will you be using CVS as an exit? Tim replied that could be done and would
be possible.
An Attendee asked which way delivery trucks would come in and off of the site. Tim replied that
the median opening would remain on US 41 after the widening, which would probably be the route
of choice for delivery trucks to make it quickly back to US 41.
Tim used the Site Plan and Aerial Map to show proposed access and exit locations. He also stated
that the road permitting would be reviewed and approved with FDOT.
Questions asked:
An Attendee asked if there was a possibility that all three of the parcels would be restaurants. Tim
responded that it was a possibility but was not likely.
An Attendee asked what type of restaurants have been built in the past by the proposed Contract
Purchaser. Tim responded that CSC Properties does not deal with one chain and he was
uncertain.
An Attendee asked if drive-thru restaurants were an option. Tim responded if a drive-thru was
desired, then a drive-thru could be constructed.
An Attendee asked where delivery trucks would be loading and unloading. Tim responded that
loading zones are building specific and are permitted through Collier County.
An Attendee asked if the delivery trucks will be limited to loading and unloading at certain times.
Tim replied deliveries are business dependent and it would need to be researched.
Tim stated that he would go discuss all issues raised at the meeting with the Contractor Purchaser,
stating delivery hours, dumpster locations and site lighting were all items that could be discussed
and worked out. He then asked for any further questions.
Questions asked:
An Attendee asked if the Rezone was granted would the Plat/Subdivisions Plans and anticipated
businesses be available at time of hearing. Tim replied that the Plat will go to the County
Commissioners for approval and made Attendees aware Plats are public information. He also
stated that the County could not choose the businesses that will be developed on the site.
An Attendee asked who will make the final decision of approval on the Rezone Request. Tim
explained the process of going to the CCPC and then to the BCC.
An Attendee asked if any of the buildings were going to be a "Spec"building. Tim replied that he
did not have an answer to that question and could not promise a "Spec" building would not be
built,
An Attendee asked if the County would allow for a "Spec" building to be constructed. Tim
responded that as long as permits were issued that buildings are able to be constructed whether a
tenant is in it or not.
An Attendee asked if the Contract Purchaser had developed sites similar to the one included in
this Rezone. Tim replied that the Contract Purchaser has not developed a site similar to this one
and has never developed in Collier County.
An Attendee asked if the property can be rezoned to a lower intensity, restricting certain uses and
businesses. Tim replied that the County could not request or ask of the property owner to change
the zoning on the properly, but that the property owner would have to voluntarily restrict certain
uses.
An Attendee asked if a gas station could be constructed on the site. Tim replied that a gas station
could be constructed in the C-3 zoning district.
Tim discussed the history of the site being rezoned in 2005 to the C-3 zoning. He explained that
the property was commercially zoned and would be built accordingly.
Question asked:
An Attendee asked about the sale price of the property. Tim replied that he was uncertain of the
sale price, due to it being blacked out in the copy of the Contract for Purchase he had.
Tim discussed how the site is more likely going to have a sit-down type of restaurant due to traffic.
He explained that fast food restaurants and gas stations look for a site that has the higher number
of pass by trips.
Questions asked:
An Attendee asked when they would be made aware if the project has been approved Tim replied
that they would receive a notification letter with the BCC hearing date, that the BCC agendas and
information are available on the County's website and also reminded Attendees that his email
address was on the letter they received regarding the NIM He explained he would respond to
emails and copy Nancy Gundlach.
An Attendee requested information on the number of parking spaces required for Retail. Tim
responded that one space per every 250 sq ft is required for retail.
Tim used the Site Plan to show the property boundary, shared with Tractor Supply, in the middle
of the drive aisle. He explained that the County requires a landscape buffer between uses,but due
to the boundary being located in the drive aisle, the Contract Purchaser is requesting a deviation
from that requirement. He further explained that the deviation is requesting that the landscaping
(about 20-30 trees)that would be required for that buffer be moved to the rear of the property.
Question asked:
An Attendee asked if a shovel could go in the ground before the unfinished wall and landscaping
were complete. Tim replied that a CO would not be issued for a building to be used before all
requirements were met, which included the completion of the wall and required landscaping, Tim
also told Attendees that a County inspector would perform a site inspection for approval to make
certain all requirements were met, before the issuance of a CO.
An Attendee asked who was responsible for painting the wall. Tim responded that whomever
constructs the wall is responsible for maintenance on both sides.
Mr.Hancock then asked if there were any other questions and thanked everyone for coming.
The meeting concluded at approximately 6:25pm
AGENDA ITEM 9-G
Co er county
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION
HEARING DATE: MAY 15, 2014
SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20140000342,NAPLES RESERVE RPUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
APPLICANT/OWNER: AGENTS:
SFI Naples Reserve, LLC Mr. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP
3232 W. Lake Mary Blvd., Ste. 1410 Hole Montes, Inc.
Lake Mary, FL 32746 950 Encore Way
Naples,FL 34110
Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire
Coleman, Yovnovich and Koester,P.A.
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples,FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an
amendment to Ordinance No. 07-71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD), to approve the excavation and off-site hauling of 1,050,000 cubic yards of
fill; to increase the size of the preserve tract and add permitted uses; to amend the RPUD Master
Plan and to provide for amendments to list of Developer Commitments; and providing an effective
date.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject 688± acre PUD (Planned Unit Development) is located approximately one mile north
of Tamiami Trail East (US-41) and 1.3 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR-951) in Section 1,
Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map on the
proceeding page.)
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 1 of 15
4 4 4
a-
.r •�UY AYMN�Y� _ _
111111111/
Z
-SIP
' !11111 I
O
w- _-f-711 mumuu=
r
H --I
y
U
I -
III11111-
-II
11
�`"� ` IIIIIIIillll\\
99 't
IS a.
:a
::::::,,:„„
I
.. .... .
c
I
1
I
mum
1
Z
r fir)aunuv� .�.
I
a
un
c' ♦ Z
111/
f
I (11„:v:11
� � � O
A 1 � 11111111111///�/ �
f �
11
r
i
� 11
it
1
r
.
N
is
-
::!:!:::::::::::::::::::1'..:!!!::::::!:::::!!:!:: ::::::!!!!!:.. .' ::"...*!!!!*:!:!: :!: i II
I
I
11
i
1111 1
• 11111111111111111
J N.
CIS 2S 4 �
N
o
S
< / CI'
3113101 WM Q
a
It
II z
O
13 I c 7-
0 w
2 U
- aS ,r j n \iii ^ / r.
r.f 1
IF L
p
L .1 n f Z
I/ /
IT h r Q
r Mi : R 1/1 n IP" ..' 1/ $ i..., n 0
II IN
t / �I a 1 M ( � q
Pp
MASTER PLAN
A,ACI()CULTURF•
fpoytlnAti PICAYI .SIRAN7 SfA1E FOREST iv 11MM4 ME
t r
tvnmE'ACCESS
2aParzrK H2O •I %
• L f j srpsr2re'.»us4i r
1 eh°»t f'•'Rk790`aJ...-.:-.-...P ` s+. .�0'w?1M�..s
' .
!,�4 R R' y ,-'a..� R. 4c.,'..rxa'4� r- - R 211'.M1N.YYSE r > �.-x�,�.�` 'y���- , .t A 1 \ ',° mix ,=�.,„ 1 SECTION/:D»BU¢fEN i r F 2. ?w 4 y J R 'lt ,f t .R :;M.'i ..-A- C
•:.1A/.7", ` .. R R y. t ; AI AGRICULT RE
"y . r:
r f R /�PS" Z 'j.y h AtCi1LItlRAL
e RCONlit/Y SIUB Olit „ ,k-s / ,,.9 IL. t: / ▪ \ r•(sEe u NNECr:stuBrDUr �G ..: -,.�� Y l• !t �..f..: ;.,:‘.,yid R ..,."�.` '' -5.;.1 n-.1 y R / • 3
SSEE UTiUtY COMIArM€{7T •-..••,,,:t. {!• ..t f '"ay 1 ►Y 't•p
B''N OMIT f'OF lilE 'T, S6 ''...1' r-• -- ) • 1 a . S�6•RPUD GRUWANO¢ExNi r) -7-4-', R ''�..Pcr"' _r r '- ' +rte• ' -,°/ °S•- :StSi
A.- ,y' z _ s f'«. � h"s•�'�:a
iNTAKIIMMION f :i t \ •' ! �y _gym s�
.. ;f'�'VT.-+ 1 x 11 c - -• �.' Ex15TNG'8G'.P,GAD EASEMENT
/ ? ti g ti t!t! "--,.,i1:-..:-..:,.::-:::0„..,,' Jye 4 5 •-- .._ - r▪ + ��,>«,.,.. , , 9 P"O,R 2485 PG. NOT
• E
P FUTUII6 <,..-.:,..t itts_,, yt! R .. > ,'' (MAY 8E VACA7FD,SEE NO E 7)
CA AOelss . R \`�„ R R '� "'` ` , .
4. •1,45,,,,v;.
� . s_ „,„3.:4. -F44:,,,...� E .gr. ' •', / 11 rf R _ ;:20'MW..itaE:•
' Y IPA mot,', R `•A0 \,r-.�P' x x____ _▪ _ `/. �: 1� �y: ;: s'eU PER
A'R7.EAYEl1EDt- r1 ;. a ,N.:-.• h Ai, -rc .,a' E. - '/- ` �. 1 tr, '�. r r,l
L .r -F, ` r `!,�\. R §s 3 x3 .. F r�'• 1t.1,!,•' rn'31 F
r.-*,-. PRE9�tVE TRACT ``� '` � .� ' -- I - ( Ensn t
q!\ .'E" �,-! - *p +x e R• 1,� R -4-3:51-
V,-�: If t JSE
pd N!'tAE prtFSktevC +,� .t~ �. l �.x'�+. N�. '." '�i1f •-,t3 .. A -ROAD
'"9C+UNDAitY _ 1� - ,g'Maras ;'a..n 5. "m s� it Cr ,c• NpgD
SSS�E 2l P a 7> '?� ! { 1# �15E
tRANSPQ@S/41WR '/' ltK t* z:,- ", '- 3yt'"' ''i . `' - • -
,f' N r TN,' 1 �_ µ A, p
(�I E r � { R R ft� r,3 � `sh` • 3 _`' • �Z I c
0.
• ^ • rte .' R' R t / -•
/ e _„ .,1.; 1.� \ .`_•
e...,...
fil R 1 .'s fil ch- '',-ft-'I » S� A --" raw w: i � ,.rn:�t; :, It- ! ! +, � .k_a 1� ,
V a r3... +■i t r C.4- k.a' 2i �ts r �. Y c � ae.
x .te r. • .." t�Yt
:4.
:s »! . 1.#i a� 'j 1.RA, tir/ X34
). '„ µ .,I[J�f/ter 0. cp ! "pyt <.,,,..,..! (( �`` V ' • '-.A.e�- _�; R r /
calita cavkn. oRA,t ( 2 R �} � R yx
cat is EASY]IEkr,= ',..',..r f --- l . .»;" ., :,. ,.,. ...r, .t
g6E13NG eGNSEAVAtlDN . .:,P �:•`".' `, �' l717*.1::::ZR: .`` .. v t€ fJ b EASEMENT PER OR,BOO# ,x�*^ ! I• ate- F/' •_ ', I R. R \� 57112 v.AekS x7a-484: i :. Pc +�,r.- PROVE.'TRACT-;�_ - R ``,R. r_AA. �f 'T''�. .E7A$71NQ[:LNsERVAI(IN!-'� ., R ;'�. : l 2. a'UIB?. 4 + M .. l •Th.kg Y � � t �M. „k x/ t j._` '' 12f T 1 -;.- A s• c x„_._e t ".
POtk- - • v POIDCZAL PRESERVE BDUNDARY.,a 1•. -r.� i F. i•Vt�w1111�
f iEE,mANBAARroolom - j•tw'MOO: R - 1 i90S . % ROAD BASMa R CA1EDl•
"IMRE ACCESfr� it:::c'OW1tf1ENr4.W E7 r'P ".'; ., l svELL-R 9DUNrr ' PFR oAl. YEA.P.a 1761
Q$11K mgt.9RMNANOE OMITS ' - , , r' rE11 EASEIe:i/t �_.S_- (MRY 8E.VACATED.7.LL Noll 7 1 `(MAY:9`e.
$ . ,_.... ,.... .k........::.:.:-.r. 1�:::-1._,F...7, :.-..rrrn'. r^.. r* +a rf r..�.yi+' ry; r RE1:.00AtRP).
•aM'tB M 271fr.3Y M 1589'8531.9t 2781.8 M '' ••
. 'lYlffii. �.QLVD.. } M111r2r •271%.Ei'P `01011 j sa97:s11'1Y 271A7G P ¢ 7
l: 1W A "mount .
Pfit.o.#..284R PAa 565 ...- .. ',20•YN4-TYPO . IODk10ti- f
... - ETBSTBa!0"ROAD.FASEMEWT PUQ,•WAGhlt1't LAKES
D'81R1•FR. C0.1IER COUNTY-
wad EASEMENT..` rea Eta‘4403 •4:1 PARTIALLY DEVLOPID(W'Y BEVACAB9,.36:E.NOTE
7) - - . ..
MASTER PLAN (continued)
35 • ju
A
110 0 303 CIO
•� pO
I- ._SG1[6t f'ET.,..:'. •�ROJECT
LOCAI1ON •
•
THE 1.00 PROVISIONS FROM �• N'K7 - p F �A �- • _
SECTION 5.08.02.8.6 ARE. + - VLt'
APPUCABLE FOR i � ( I -
, s ..
OEFTPREMISE SIONACE--••-�,.. t.`e r �. ..
3s; 45
AFB;
L
•
LEGAL DESCRIP11QN
.. SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP'31..5OUTH,RANGE 28 EAST
RPUD•MASTER PLAN NOTES:
1. *GUN THE PLi0•BOUNDARIES'THERE NIL BE'A MIffiMUM OF.60%OF OPEN SPACE IN THE
'URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE AND.70%OPEN SPACE II THE RURAL FRINGE.
2. THE REQUIRED 60%AND 70.4.OPEN SPACE(SEE.CHART BELOW]SHALL BE:PROVIDED.
!3. 'THE FACIUTTES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN'ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE
.CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE.
4. THE"DESIGN,LOCATION AND CDNFIOURATION OF.THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL!BE DEFINED
Al.EITHER SDP.APPROVAL OR QONSTRUCTION"PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL.
6. T .LAKE AND OPEN WAGE AREAS ALONG THE.NORTH BOUNDARY SATISFY THE
.REQUIREEIENTS'OF LOC SECTION..3.05 O7.G3. •
8. THERE'SHALL BE A:MINIMUM OF 41.1 ACRES OF NATIVE.PRESERVE WITHIN THE RPUD
7. SHOULD THE E78STING 80'WIDE ROADWAY EASEMENT"ON THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN
• •'BBIRNDARts BE VACATED OR DITINCUISNED,THE 20 POOT.WIDE TYPE Ti. 'BUFFER NILI.rE
LOCATED ADJACENT TO.THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES.
8. THE PRESERVE SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED-WITH.ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS TO SATISFY BOTH
LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIRO/ENTS:ANA NATIVE PRESERVE REOIII EIAENT5 OF THE LDC.
LEGEND: LAND USE SUMMARY
. ..
DIMING PRESERVE _ TRACT LAND.USE: AGREAC
,R„— 1,14 ew. •
LAKE TRACT.`RA'
TRACT"r/f� PUBLIC RIptT-OF-WA'T Rk VATION •. PRESERVE. 7?1
TOTAL: 688.1
F.7-7.171. E%15iNCi "ROARYOLE EASP_RENF- •
p��p�
i F P07EN71AL F11111RL RECREATION AREA kEQUIR." PPM SPACE SUMMARY
'/� IA10 USE ACREAGE OPEN SPAS I ACREAGE!
•
OPTIONAL CATE HOUSE ENTRY FEATURE OPiN4 SPAS I
i iTFTi 3778 TOyL 263.98 •
• -, ORE4NWAY1MULTi-USE PATHWAY
ME ,310.94 I ---MOIL 10636
RA RECREATION AREA{PER PLAT)
F
Des
PRESERVE TRACT cry SUMMARY
Fj RESIDENTIAL TRACT lirNSITY TJ[SGRIPTION .1 DU/AC• 1RBTS
MAXIMUM DENSITY vi/RHEIU.' tl�8 .347
CREWE.
WITH r 1.67 1154..
TPR CREDITS
•
•
•
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Naples Reserve RPUD currently allows for a maximum of 1,154 residential units, uses
accessory to residential uses, a recreation area, and a preserve. As part of the residential
development, several lakes have been approved. Commercial excavation has been approved for all
lakes shown on the master plan.
The Naples Reserve RPUD project was originally approved in Ordinance Number 2007-71 on
November 13, 2007. (Please see Attachment C: Ordinance number 2007-71.) The PUD was
amended on July 24, 2012 to remove the golf course from the development and to increase the
amount of fill that could be removed from the permitted commercial excavation. Some of the
excavated fill was to be used for the Tamiami Trail East/US 41 roadway widening project
(between Collier Boulevard and CR 92). (Please see Attachment B: Ordinance number 2012-29.)
The primary purpose of this PUD amendment is to further increase the quantity of fill that can be
removed from the commercial excavation to a total of 1,050,000 cubic yards and to expand the
destination area of the fill to a 10 mile radius from the subject site. A concurrent application has
also been submitted to amend the existing excavation permit.
The Naples Reserve RPUD is also being amended to allow TDR's (Transfer of Development
Rights) to be acquired consistent with a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) that is
proceeding towards approval. The GMPA will allow a limited exclusion specific to the Naples
Reserve RPUD to permit a percentage of TDR Credits to be severed and transferred from any
lands designated Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District to this RPUD.
The Amendment proposes the following changes to the Transportation section of PUD Ordinance
Exhibit F,Developer Commitments:
}
• The destination of excavated material is expanded to a 10 mile radius from Naples Reserve
RPUD. (Previously the majority of the material was limited to the US 41 widening project.)
• The total amount of excavated material is increased and shall not exceed 1,050,000 cubic
yards.
• Hours of operation are limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.Monday thru Friday.
At Utilities Staff request, a Utilities and Engineering Commitment has been added to provide a
water main interconnection between Naples Reserve RPUD and Winding Cypress PUD.
At Environmental Staffs request, a list of permitted uses for the Tract P Preserve has been added
to PUD Exhibit A: Project Land Use Tracts.
Staff has also requested some grammatical changes to the PUD document along with an enlarged
Master Plan that is now two pages instead of one page.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Picayune Strand State Forest,with a zoning designation of Agriculture(A)
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 5 of 15
East: Agriculture and disturbed lands with a zoning designation of Agriculture(A)
South: Preserve areas within a residential development, vacant land and then agriculture, with a
zoning designation of Walnut Lakes PUD and Agriculture(A).
West: Residential development with a zoning designation of Winding Cypress DRI (Development
of Regional Impact)
SUBJECT
rint
PROPERT r — : _, . – ` iJ
a1A4cc'.NESTER p aj i't
r,r,
ar:- s
MANATEE r , •1 I . l
4 3 c • FR r
:Prza^r1. s ae
As: NMJ O R N
CA4TOCT, S 4 .. _
AERIAL PHOTO
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN(GMP)CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element: The subject site is zoned Naples Reserve RPUD and designated
partly Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands and partly Urban,
Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (URF) on the Future Land Use
Map. The 688± acre subject site is undeveloped and the PUD provides for a maximum gross
density of 1.68 dwelling units per acre (DUA). This petition relies on recently transmitted, to be
adopted (as of June 10, 2014 BCC (Board of Collier County Commissioners)) provisions in the
Future Land Use Element to achieve consistency. That amendment (ref. CP-2013-1) allows the
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 6 of 15
i2
transfer of TDR credits originating more distant than one (1) mile from the URF boundary for use
in the Naples Reserve PUD.
Adopted Ordinance 2007-71, and including the amending Ordinance 2012-29 (deleting an 18 hole
Golf Course and deleting a Neighborhood Village Commercial Center) —both allow a maximum
of 1154 DU's (dwelling units) (or 1.677 DU/A) and a requirement for a minimum of 612 TDR
Credits to be obtained in order to achieve the allowed maximum density. Of these, a minimum of
311 TDR credits must be obtained from Sending Lands within one mile of the Urban area.
Future Land Use Element(FLUE)Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the
surrounding land area. Please refer to the Zoning analysis section of this Staff Report.
In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of
Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and
redevelopment projects,where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text].
Objective 7:
In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The
Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and
adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be
implemented for new development and redevelopment projects,where applicable.
Policy 7.1:
The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting
collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating
intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject property does
not front a collector or arterial road, as classified by the Transportation Element. The
proposed PUD Master Plan depicts primary access to US 41 East (an arterial road) via
Naples Reserve Boulevard,and a secondary,future access onto Greenway Road.]
Policy 7.2:
The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle
congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The
proposed PUD Master Plan depicts a main internal road configuration with multiple internal
roundabouts and numerous connecting local streets. Internal accesses are provided to
neighboring properties in an effort to reduce specific vehicle (haul truck) congestion on US
41.]
Policy 7.3:
All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their
interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use
type. [This PUD is located approximately 1% miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), and
approximately '/2 mile north of US 41 East, north of the Reflection Lakes development
(Walnut Lakes PUD).
• Lands to the north lie inside the Picayune Strand State Forest and are owned by the
State of Florida—where interconnection is not possible.
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL2 0 1 400003 42
May 5,2014
Page 7 of 15
• Greenway Road lies to the east of the subject RPUD, and land further east is in
agricultural use — where interconnection is shown on the RPUD Master Plan as
"Future Gated Access". The entire eastern boundary is shown with an existing 60 ft.
wide road easement.
• A portion of the land to the south is zoned Walnut Lakes PUD and developed as
Reflection Lakes of Naples; and, undeveloped land zoned A, Rural Agricultural —
where interconnection is shown on the RPUD Master Plan as "Potential Future
Access". A portion of the southern boundary is shown with an existing 60 ft. wide
road easement.
• Land to the west of the subject RPUD is zoned Winding Cypress PUD/DRI
(Development of Regional Impact) and partially developed as Verona Walk — where
interconnection is shown on the RPUD Master Plan as "Potential Future Gated
Access". ]
Policy 7.4:
The County shall encourage new developments densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and
a range of housing prices and types. [The PUD amendments being proposed do not relate to
this Policy.]
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic
Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient
capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject
application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth
Management Plan(GMP).
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Natural Resources Department
Staff reviewed this petition and determined the proposed amendment to be consistent with the
Conservation&Coastal Management Element(CCME).
GMP Conclusion: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed Planned Unit Development
Amendment may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria
upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5,
Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD
Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report
(referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's
recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the
BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation
relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land
Development Review Analysis."In addition, Staff offers the following analyses:
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 8 of 15
Environmental Review: Natural Resources Department staff has reviewed the petition and the
PUD document to address environmental concerns. The minimum acreage of native preservation
required to be retained within the PUD is 41.1 acres and has been included in Exhibit F of the
proposed PUD Ordinance.
Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed this petition and recommends
approval. This approval is subject to the adoption of the Transportation Commitments provided in
Exhibit F of the proposed PUD Ordinance and to the following condition of approval:
1. "Within 45 days of the approval of this PUD Ordinance,the Developer shall provide a 5-foot
wide paved area along the east side of Greenway Road with flex stakes at 20-feet on center in
order to provide a pedestrian zone."
Utility Review: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed this petition and recommends
approval subject to the adoption of the Utility and Engineering Commitment to provide a water
main interconnect as described in Exhibit F of the proposed PUD Ordinance.
Emergency Management Review: The Emergency Management staff has reviewed the petition
and has no concerns.
Zoning and Land Development Review: Relationship to Existing and Future Land Uses: A
discussion of this relationship, as it applies specifically to Collier County's legal basis for land use
planning, refers to the relationship of the uses that would be permitted if the proposed zoning
action is approved,as it relates to the requirement or limitations set forth in the FLUE of the GMP.
The primary change as noted previously is to further increase the amount of fill that can be
removed from the commercial excavation to 1,050,000 cubic yards and to expand the destination
area of the fill to a 10 mile radius from the subject site. The increase in commercial excavation
will have an impact on traffic in the neighboring area. The approved Commercial Excavation
Permits and associated Executive Summary (see Attachment D) indicate that Greenway Road will
be widened and will be the primary haul route. There will be an increase in the number of trips
from 107 to 280 daily two-way trips for a period of time.
No changes to the approved maximum density are being proposed as part of this amendment
request. This PUD amendment does not propose any changes that would adversely affect
environmental,buffer, or drainage issues.
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the Planning
Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following
criteria:"
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water,
and other utilities.
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 9 of 15
The currently approved type and pattern of residential development was determined to be
suitable when the subject PUD was approved.
However, as previously stated, the increase in commercial excavation will have an impact on
traffic in the local neighborhood. The approved Commercial Excavation Permits and
associated Executive Summary (see Attachment D) indicate that Greenway Road will be
widened and is the primary haul route. There will be an increase in the number of trips
from 107 to 280 daily two-way trips for a period of time.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract,
or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's
Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. The PUD document and the general
LDC development regulations make appropriate provisions for the continuing operation and
maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and
policies of the GMP.
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals,
objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on
that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall
GMP,dependent upon the adoption of the companion GMP amendment.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
The currently approved development,landscaping and buffering standards were determined
to be compatible with the adjacent uses and with the use mixture within the project itself
when the PUD was previously approved. Staff believes that this amendment will not change
the project's compatibility,both internally and externally,with the proposed amendments.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The existing open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the
LDC.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 10 of 15
Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project
at this time, i.e., the GMP is consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the
GMP Transportation Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development
must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when
development approvals are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
This proposed PUD Amendment will not adversely impact the previous BCC finding that the
subject property and surrounding areas can accommodate expansion.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00
regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all
applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This
petition has been reviewed by County staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of
the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no
Level of Service will be adversely impacted.
REZONE FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations of the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show
that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable." (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the GMP.
The Comprehensive Planning Department has indicated that the proposed PUD amendment
and proposed GMP amendment are consistent with all applicable elements of the Future
Land Use Element(FLUE)of the Growth Management Plan(GMP).
2. The existing land use pattern.
This amendment will not affect the existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern
will remain the same.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
Not applicable. The districts are existing and established.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the
property proposed for change.
Not applicable. The districts are existing and established.
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 11 of 15
S. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the
LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to increase the quantity of
commercial fill that is exported from the subject site.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood.
The amendment will increase the amount of commercial excavation traffic for a period of
time in the neighborhood. However, through the Excavation Permit Conditions, the
community will receive the benefit of permanent roadway improvements to Greenway
Boulevard and to US 41 (Tamiami Trail East) in exchange for accommodating the gravel
haul operation which is expected to cease near the end of 2016/early 2017.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The proposed amendment will adversely impact local area traffic circulation for the duration
of the commercial exporting of the fill material.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed amendment will not affect drainage. Furthermore, the subject site is subject
to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
Not applicable. The proposed amendment will not change the previously approved
a l
development standards that affect the amount of light and air to the adjacent area.
10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Staff is of the opinion this PUD amendment will not adversely impact property values.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Properties around this property are already partially developed. The basic premise '.
underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their
sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or
subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in
deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed
zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties.
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 12 of 15
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed PUD amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency
with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions
consistent with plans are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with
existing zoning.
The property already has a PUD zoning designation and could be developed within the
parameters of that zoning ordinance; however, the petitioner is seeking this amendment in
compliance with LDC provisions for such amendments. The petition can be evaluated and
action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the
proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district and further, believes the public interest
will be maintained.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD amendment is not out of scale with the needs of
the neighborhood and the county.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however,
this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a PUD amendment.
The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and
staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be
required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed
zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require site alteration and these
residential sites will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development
regulations during the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance.
The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00
regarding Adequate Public Facilities for and the project. It must be consistent with all
applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This
petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014
Page 13 of 15
the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that no Level of
Service will be adversely impacted.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem
important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM):
The applicant duly noticed and held the required meeting on April 9, 2014, at 5:30 p.m. at the
South Regional Library, located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, Florida. Four people
along with the applicant and County Staff attended the meeting. For further information, please
see the Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM) Summary(Attachment E).
The meeting ended at approximately 6:15 p.m.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition PUDA-PL20140000342,
revised on April 22,2014.
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning
Commission forward Petition PUDA-PL20140000342 to the Board of County Commissioners
with a recommendation of approval of this amendment subject to the following condition of
approval:
1. "Within 45 days of the approval of this PUD Ordinance,the Developer shall provide a 5-foot
wide paved area along the east side of Greenway Road with flex stakes at 20-feet on center in
order to provide a pedestrian zone."
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
May 5,2014 •
Page 14 of 15
PREPARED BY:
LJ ALJA /.E .AL# 14 A it (7 2o1+
NANCY D CH, Al P, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE
GROWT 'VA EMENT DIVISION
REVIEWED BY:
• 4 . 17_ /1...
RAYMO �d V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE
GROWT'i ANAGEMENT DIVISION
/t/
_ ---
MICHAEL BOSI,AICP,DIRECTOR DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
APPROVED BY:
r
NICK CASAL sOUIVA,A1VIINISTRATOR DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Attachments:
A. Ordinance
B. Ordinance number 12-29
C. Ordinance number 07-71
D. Commercial Excavation Permits and associated Executive Summary
E. NIM Synopsis
Naples Reserve RPUD,PUDA-PL20140000342
April 22,2014
Page 15 of 15
ORDINANCE:NO. 1i4-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 07-
71, AS AMENDED, THE NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD), TO
APPROVE THE EXCAVATION AND OFF-SITE HAULING OF
1,050,000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL; TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE
PRESERVE TRACT AND ADD PERMITTED USES; TO AMEND THE
RPUD MASTER PLAN AND TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENTS TO
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ONE
MILE NORTH OF U.S. 41 AND 1-1/2 MILES EAST OF COLLIER
BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUN'T'Y, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF
688+1-ACRES. [PUDA-PL20140000342]
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved.
Ordinance No.. 07-71, which established the Naples Reserve. Golf Club Residential Planned Unit
Development(RPUD);and
WHEREAS, On July 24, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida approved Ordinance No. 12-29,which amended the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD;and
WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, I AICP of Hole Ivlontes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich,
Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich& Koester representing SET Naples Reserve, LLC, petitioned the
Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to amend Ordinance 07-71,the Naples
Reserve Golf Club RPUD,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.that;
SECTION I Amendments to Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, of Ordinance Number 07-71, as
amended,the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD
The List of Permitted Uses; previously attached.as Exhibit A.to Ordinance Number 07-71,
as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD,.is hereby amended and replaced with a new
Exhibit A, List of Permitted Uses, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein,.
Naples Reserve RPUD Page 1 of 2
PUDA-PL20140000342--rev.4/11/14
Attachment A
r 3
SECTION II: Amendments to Exhibit C, Master Plan, of Ordinance .Number 07-71, as
amended,the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD
The Master Plan, previously attached as Exhibit C to Ordinance Number 07-71,as amended,
the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit C,
Master Plan,attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein..
SECTION III: Amendments to Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, of Ordinance
Number 07-71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD
The List of Developer Commitments,previously attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance Number
07-71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a
new Exhibit I', List of Developer Commitments, attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
SECTION 1V: Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall become effective upon.tiling with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this day of 2014..
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, .FLORIDA
By: By: _ __ _
Deputy Clerk _..._ _ TOM HENNING,Chairman.
Approved as to form and legality:
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A—Permitted Uses
Exhibit C—.Master Pan.
Exhibit F—List of Development Commitments
CP\,14-CPS-07 302/27
Naples Reserve RPUD Page 2 of 2
PtJDA-PI.20 140000342—rev.4/11/14
NAPLES RESERVE RPUD
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS
TYPE UNITS/FT. ACREAGE
TRACT"R" RESIDENTIA..I., 1154 592.8 583.9
TRACT"RA" RECREATION AREA 0 31.6
TRACT"P" PRESERVE 0 63.7 72.6
TOTAL: 688.1
I. TRACT R PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure,or part thereof,shall be erected, altered or used,or land used, in
whole or in part,for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
1) Single-family detached dwellings;
2) Single-family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee
simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence):
3) Villa/patio dwellings (detached single-family dwellings of a smaller scale
than the typical single-family detached dwelling);
4) Multi-family dwellings;
5) Model homes:
6) Commercial excavations for all lakes identified as "L" on Exhibit C —
RPUD Master Plan(subject to Exhibit F List of.Developer Commitments,
Transportation Item D);
7) Project sales; construction and administrative office, which may occur in
residential,and/or in temporary structures;
8) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning
Appeals ("$ZA") by the process outlined in the Land Development Code
(LDC).
Page 1 of 14
Words pndctlined arc added.words struekdtfatt#are:deleted
I-\2O12\?012103;Wril'UtA.3,Mtnor Resubn itutl\Naples Reserve RPUI)(PUDA-PL-2O14-0342)4-11-14 dews
ElIk
B. Accessory Uses:.
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal 1;
uses and structures, including,but not limited to:.
1) Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to
private garages, swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures,
gatehouses,and other outdoor recreation facilities;
2) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections,
IL TRACT RA PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof,shall be erected,altered or used,or land used, in
whole or in part,for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses Typically Accessory to Residential Development:
I) Structures intended to provide social and recreational space (private,
intended for use by the residents and their guest only);
2) Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis
and basketball courts. playground improvements/facilities, and passive
and/or active water features.
3) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning
Appeals("BZA")by the process outlined in the LDC.
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal
uses and structures,including,but not limited.to:
I) Customary accessory uses or structures incidental to recreation areas and,
or facilities, including structures constructed for purposes of maintenance,
storage or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping.
III. TRACT P PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure,or part thereof,shall be erected, altered or used.or land used, in
whole or in part.for other than the following:
Page2o:f14
{
Words gndrrtined are added,words k {tro gh are deleted
11;k2012\21.112 1 031WP,PUT)AWlinor Resuhmitial Naples Reserve RPUD(PLJDA-111 2_014-0342)4-1 I-I4.docx
A. Principal Uses:
I") Preservation of native habitat.
B. Accessory Uses:
I) Storm water management, treatment. conveyance facilities. and structures,
such as berms,wales.and outfall structures.
2) Pervious and impervious pathways and boardwalks, consistent with LDC,
Section 3:45.07.H.l I.
3) Shelters without walls.
4) Educational sismage and bulletin boards located on or immediately adjacent to.
the pathway.
5) Benches for seating.
6) Viewing platforms.
Conservation-related and recreational activities comparable in nature with the
aforementioned uses.as determined by the County Manager or designee.
Page 3 of 14
Words are added.words saritek-11roi ;ire deleted
}{:12012\2012103\VVI'PUPA\Mhnoi ResibmittallNaples Rese»v RPM)(PLIDAPL-2014-01342)4-1 I-34.docx
1
EXHIBYT C.
MASTER PLAN
A,AGi(cunatE
oaiENvA PICAYUP ST1 A1' STATE FOREST or`secnw.,
iru "'":HC AGU'35 T. 'w fl A ti;,u 'Arar2ra Y.9L0: .TT y�
k x 54 R R t,
L A:r tas ai
3D'41W iWC� } E
r' " R <,
}L rr
" i- R ' R .,j ��1GRlC1J4�1'ru•
R ♦s..Y '' �4
R, L .� R
f
w..
e p,,,,,xf wA!(8 VAN' s
NTCY!COICY[c.a[ue-DUt .' { .R. 5 y • R. :S
1,N.L coosY.4nNetutn'5 I„ !t R R R � ..
'me PS+FAt'Attx,.. .,,Y ty r r:arSTNC b0'pDAtS k+ttAriNt
YohNnµ,hmw6 L�- :: '� 'R rer
aA�AX 55 R 4! c+ r R e r _ -,0,(Rbi.i.kr ecy:„,,,,!to,ire Wan 7)
(WAY eC. .:i '1 R. RIY - �_:
os'etaa R `v ,
raucx CouNTY ��
p...E5ERVE TRACT r� ' q k IV '•
Y ro.nftANY ax � - 'ii L t rl
tbliu)'r4rT A 1.1,..,-. t, - '- t
11.1 enemr.Y C% R R /'f i �t
rNC i.). F .. , [t _
1 t Y '' At, ' } R R R �j�f K R
I. t R ,rr v tf.RA
PL rN 1 1 -- ,- ^l �i/w r '+'.is RA „,'''.,::::t K r �:F� -
y �I t ww. y i!:” Iv �RA 4.-...;!, } ( R /fr� \ a s
,..1,i _ r r;'.,r 11 t t 4;,_, r:- fir{ R -.,•`�, _Y kA
r J et G; \'�-)' R ti 1 R 1 EY.
,..,ti--. 'c r.Y t -1 'kAi..,.•.._,:,:::::;::,!.i„,..,,,,,,,+f/ . 'Y - R `_._._._- ..-j. ' {`c-
EgiS'A3G CcccQUwAT 3 1' �'� ' : P� - - R �t R ...---- $
EAS[lir.ir PCA S°''eaax t:T A r . 4, f'' PRESERVE TRAcT ; ' R..
(1_,4.,.„,s:-:-__ R !' l i 1: r.:
[xisnNa Ct2fY:t wit L l
■¢s:y aE ad,,s;.II;p+r{s z?}-sa \ t. ! R - .
aF 5CCYWy+ t 3
! I� -Yaitir !17FS3RME RWirit'lY. - 12 -} 1 ./VTIi{
..nOSCNTxVl ♦. SEE TJ!AlilTCitYAY`dN 'a0 f06 R Jy bo"STsfG:*OAR p,;PI R (*kr
t'i GC!+!4TNG'1T ► w F74 p,i Y . ... CN YAa.?1'F ;PI
S' Cc fl4 ANtfD ChD!'1Ah'tY C>una'is -h Mai CASLLi7r? t (WAY YAGTFD,SE"IW r 7). t: ktl t1CAT[D2
�..._NAPLES RESkR.VE KIVR �T" '' ' "• s3'$[f I3 4 �:es zsf-. w q .•
'fit':>°r""i.� C+'SCC°ON I44 11.A?.r_?.•P
!id'Frs7CYS Fwg[s:(ui yG NM,''r
�''♦q R.R.7e4Z PAGC MA 1tethilC'
CIhS'WC 40 *OAP 1.AltkINT 1'�.�r WALA#,IT Loec 'L'`9Vyr?R W[tA'EI�.OS!!ii'Y
YEN ail ziE]'PC:-!:wt PARTT UX DEMI wee ustw.!+Y
(WAY AE VACATED.se NOW r)
Page 7of14
E
Woids i+r ilcrlirtc arc added,words i are deleted
li:1201'?1201210,3\W'P':PL:1)At1Ytinor Resubminal3Naptes ltescrvc 12PUU(PU[)A1-PL-20 1 3-1134 2)4-11-14 docx
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
EXHIBIT C
MASTER PLAN(continued}
SS
604 600
f 1.00A 1 ION f r �f
•- ,///1"(7,
THC I.DC PROY510N5 rROFJ
.SECTIDN 4:DIE,05.4.R ARE. -awr
APPLICABLE FOR
•
_ r
LEGAL DESGRIPTTOM
StCi1PN t, {OYNJH:P St SD IIrf,-RANEE z6•LAM
•
RPU MA$113t PLAN- NOTES:
r: A DtPI NHC Puo OCkINDARIEE%RE VALI.BE A URJDAUM Oi sox 00-WEN SPACE iH THE
URBAN RESIDENTIAL F NNGE AND 70%OPEN SPACE IN THE RURAL FRINGE.
5. DIE KonaEA-41%ANO 50%OPEN SPACE.(SEE CINAR'E BELON,SHALL BE-PRA:40ED,
3, THE.EACOJTIE5.AND IYPROAS.IENTS 5140444 ON INC PUG„MASTER PL N SHALL.65
CON510[RGO CGJCEP'TUAL W NATURE..
4. THE OESIGRi•LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OE 14:LAND IHPROV€IIERTS SHALL BE DEFINED
AT EITHER SOP APPROVAL OR.CONSTRUCTION PLANR Aria PLAT APPROVAL.
•
5. THE TAKE AEA.OPEN SPACE AREAS ALONG 14E110H/it BOJNOARY SATES!T THE
REDUIRENENT5 OF LOG SECTION 103,07.5.3. • - • ..
6: THERE SHALL 6E A ALriINU■ OF 171.1 AC145•CF NATIVE PRESERVE*THIN THE,RPU1.•
7, SHOULD TEtE EIDS11KG.fi0'RITE ROADWAY EASEMENNT pry DIE SWIItERN AND.EASTFR%
BOUNDARIES RE'.VACAIEO CR ttairt UISHf3I.THE 50 FOOT.WIDE TYPE.*TY BUTTER!Ail RE
LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN-AND'EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARIEs:
8. THE.-PRESERV SHALL'BE SUPPLEMENTED YATH ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS TO SATISFY BOTH
LANDSCAPE ITHITER REAUIRE1ENTS-AND NATIVE PRESERVE.REWIRENENTS OF THE LOC.,
1,4T WD. i L.A 4 USE SUMMARY-
TRACT.
EpS7IN E$
C PR[5K i ' EAFO 135. ACRCACL
1. . I !TRACT`R ktsprNn#4, SEL4
LAXE'
'MAC/ ft[f"Al[ATX+AL
.._ -�cn 31.6
TRACT'P' -PRESERVE
•(777.7.7•71 P535 i0 KIG11-00,1aY RESERYAT:ON TOTAL 6M.t�_ •
5551)46 iRSASiWAT EA5f8EN'r _._
ritk/Ukiti c*e SPACE SUMMARY
I PDTSNRAL 7'U1DRe-[ECR£AR0.■AREA ..... ..
LA:4)1115•ATE1M ACREA(Z,
* _OPTKNAL 4ATT.130345E ENTRY.FEATURE • 1340 ' 377.77 1 76% - 763.96
Cali '3489.4 ST% INCLS6
.� '�.• Ia�FFNMAY/liUl'R-1.65E PATNNAY:
RA RECREATION'AREA TER MAO
•p PRESrAVC 7RACr. DENSE Y._MJMMARY
• rx.risrIY tlrs[P;5o 1UfAC rfrs
iDu gfkil7Y 1YlT1iEY.JT OXN 41:
TOREREIXT5
AtAxImum L»i ......._..............._.....:........_:_.._
•
Ifi VMH
Page 8 of 14
Words underliutd are added,words RMTIeR-tl r-ei:Itk are deleted-
11si2(i 1'212012I03\WPWPUDAVOinor Resubmittnl\Naples Receive itl'Ut) t44)342)a-..l 1-14,docx•
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
TRANSPORTATION
This development of this RPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions:
A. The RPUD Master Plan reflects a 100' wide reservation for dedication along the western
boundary of the RPUD: Should the County find it is appropriate to improve that corridor,
the Der-eloper Owner, its successor, or assigns shall agree to be a part of a joint permit
application with Collier County for the specific purpose of modifying the existing
conservation easement. All costs associated with the potential conservation easement
modification,including any required mitigation shall be responsibility of the County. The
100' reservation shall be dedicated by the Owner to the County at no cost, and in fee
simple title within 180 days of the County's request Thedeveleper Owner shall provide
a storm water management system within RPUD boundary for treatment/retention of
storm water from the 100 foot reservation area.
B. The Developer agrees to provide mitigation for traffic impacts as detailed in the
companion Developer's Contribution, Agreement[DCA] in order to provide consistency
with policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan." The
DCA provides for improvements to the intersection of US-41 and Collier Boulevard,
and/or US-41 east of Collier Boulevard.
C. if warranted and approved by the County, the developer Owner shall be responsible for
the proportionate fair share cost of a traffic signal,or turn lane extension/expansion at the
intersection of Naples Reserve Boulevard and 11S-41 Tamiami Trail. If Naples Reserve
Boulevard should become a Public Roadway: in the future, then the proportionate share
requirement shall apply to this development's entrance where it intersects with Naples
Reserve Boulevard. Upon completion of the installation, inspection, burn-in period and
final approval/acceptance of traffic signal at either location mentioned in the previous
paragraph, ownership and maintenance of the signal shall be turned over to. Collier
County. Any negations relevant to fair share payments or reimbursements from any and
all other neighboring developers/property owners that direct benefit from said traffic
signal,will be determined based upon the percentage of usage/impact."
D. Excavated material - _
of the total volume excavated may be removed from the development
the-cle-leprilent and be transported off:site only for use in the US-41 roadway widening
project from the intersection of US 41 and Collier Boulevard to the intersection of US 41
Page 11 of 14
Words andcrtinid arc raided,words titruelt litettghhare.dcleltd
102 012\20 12103\Wl'U't)DAiM.inaarResubmittai\NapleaR¢scrVeRP1JU(PUi)A-P1r 0i4-0$42)4,11-1.4:doca
and CR92_, - - - ' . -
Additionally, excavated material:above and beyond that provided to the US 41 project.
may be removed from the development, and transported to adjacent and nearby
developments(within a radius of ten miles).
It is anticipated that a minimum of 400,000 cubic yards of fill will be provided to the US
41 project. Therefore, the maximum amount of fill transported offsite to adjacent and
nearby developments shall be limited to a maximum of 650,000 cubic yards. The total,
amount of excavated materialsemoved from the development shall not exceed 1,050.000
cubic yards.
Flours of operation shall be limited to 7 AM to.5 PM, Monday-Friday..
E, -'- - ..A secondary access point for a ishall be provided off of
Creenway Road prior to export of excavation materials.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The development of this RPUD Maser Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the
following conditions:
A. Preserves for the The Naples Reserve RPUD have been platted previously and are
depicted on Exhibit C.RPUD Master Plan.A minimum of 41.1 acres of native vegetation,•
shall be retained. • • - •
0
PLANNING
A. A maximum of 1154 dwelling units are permitted in the PUD, of which 542 units are
derived from the allowable base density and 612 are derived from TDR credits, All,
residential density above the base density shall be derived from TDR Credits severed and.
transferred from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands consistent with the
Page 12 of 14
Words underlined are added,words k-khroeg}t are deleted
1-02012\Mi21.03\WP\.PUDA\Minor ResubmittallNapies Reserve RPUD(PUDA-PL 2O14-0342)4-1 1-14.docx
provisions of the. Collier. County Growth Management Plan.4n order to increase
Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits. a
TDR calculation sheet shall be.submitted documenting that the developer has acquired all
TDR credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet tracks the
chronological assignment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development
orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been
reached(all.TDR credits allowing residential development reach:a zero balance).
B. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring
until close-out of the PUD,and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD
commitments until close-out of the .PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the
Managing Entity is SPI. Naples-Reserve, EEC. Should the Managing Entity desire to
transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a
copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the
County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its
obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff,and the successor entity
shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing
Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the
commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to
comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity
shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD are closed
out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and.fulfillment
of PUD commitments.
C. Construction of the clubhouse will commence prior to the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy(CO)for the 231"residential dwelling unit.
WATER.MANAGEMENT
A. Constructed drainage facilities and structures shall be located outside the boundaries of
conservation easements/preserves
B. The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to fully contain the 100-
year/72-hour design storm event with a regulated discharge rate not to exceed 0.08
cfs/acre and no increase in total volume of discharge.
C. All elevations shall be based on the North American Vertical.Datum (NAVD).
Page 13 of 14
Words underlined are added,words stwek-thtrcwgh are deleted
1-:'2012'2012(0,\WP.I't DA\Miner ResubniittaliNaples Reserve RPtlI)(PUDA-1'I:2014•4342)4-11-14.doex
UTILITIES AND ENGINEE.R.ING.
A. The owner shall reserve four areas to potentially be dedicated to the Collier County
Water-Sewer District for raw water well easements with dimensions of 100-foot by 100-
foot each,along with utility/access easements that shall be 20 feet wide,or less if the well.
site is contiguous to a public right-of-way. The approximate locations of these four
proposed easements are depicted on the proposed Master Plan. One of these four wells
may be used as a test well and converted to a production well. The test well will not be
converted into a production well until the water management lakes proposed near the test
well are constructed in accordance with the 50 foot setback standard. No additional
production wells will be installed until the project's water management lakes have been
constructed or the year 2027,whichever is earlier.
Upon request of the.Collier County Water-Sewer District,the owner shalt convey to the
Collier County Water-Sewer District the requested utility/access .easements and raw
water well easements within 60 days, free and clear.of all liens and encumbrances: The
Collier County Water-Sewer District shall pay the owner $15,930 per acre for those
easements that are conveyed or dedicated to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. If
all or some of the conveyances have not been requested by the Collier County Water-
Sewer District at the earlier of Site Development Plan ("SDP") and/or final construction
plans and plat ("PPL") approval or within six years approval of this Ordinance, then the.
reserved areas shall be deemed released.
At the time of the SDP and/or PPL submittal, the owner shall show the well site
reservations applicable to the area within the SDP and/or plat. During the review of the
SDP and/or. PPL, the Collier County Water-Sewer District shall decide at that time
whether it will request the dedication of the utility/access:easement, Failure to request the
utility/access easement shall be deemed a release of the utility/access easement and the
final.SDP and/or PPL shall be approved without the.Utility/access easement.
B. The developer will provide an 8"potable water main interconnection stub-out intended to
serve as a potable water interconnect to the Winding Cypress PUD, as requested on,
behalf of the Collier County Water and Sewer District. The general location of the
interconnect is shown conceptually on the RPUD Master Plan; and the location can be
changed administratively, without a formal. PUD amendment at the discretion of the.
County;the Collier County Water and Sewer District, and the developer.The water main
stub-out from the Naples Reserve PUD will terminate at the easterly boundary of the
roadway reservation in the location generally depicted on the RPUD Master Plan. The
water main interconnect stub-out plans, and details will be submitted to Collier County at
the time of the submittal of the construction plans and plat for the parcel adjacent to the
proposed location for final approval.The interconnect stub-out will be constructed as part
of the construction plans and plat improvements associated with the development parcel
adjacent to the interconnect stub-out location shown on the RPUD Master Plan:
Page 14 of 14
Worms sandcrlincti are added,words g1+are deleted
1i\20 1 2120 12 10314VP\P3DAVAinor Res ubmittaRNaplesReserve(Zl°UD:(PUDA-PL-2014-0342)4-11-14 doex
ORDINANCE NO. 12 - 29
=".4N ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
1 COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07-71, THE NAPLES RESERVE
GOLF CLUB RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPME1-
(RPUD), TO REMOVE A GOLF COURSE FROM THE R1'1,1;1* -,'
PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO PERMITTED USES
PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT:, r-- -„
STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO MAST 4k:
PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO LIST ` tt::
REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC; PROVIDING KI , --- �t
AMENDMENTS TO LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENT* `•''
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, SUBJECT PROPER ;
IS LOCATED ONE MILE NORTH OF US 41 AND 1-1/2 MILS
EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 688+1-ACRES.
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Ordinance No. 07-71, which established the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential Planned Unit
Development(RPUD); and
WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau, AICP, of R W A, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of
Coleman. Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing SFI Naples Reserve, LLC, petitioned the
Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida to amend Ordinance 07-71, the Naples
Reserve Golf Club RPUD.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF CC)LLI.ER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
SECTION I: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT A, LIST OF ALLOWABLE USES, OF
ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71.NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD
The List of Allowable Uses, previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 07-71,
the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit A, List of
Allowable Uses. attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
Naples Reserve/PL2011-1168 Page 1 oI.3
Rev.4/20/12
Words stftte4H4irettgh are deleted:words underlined are added.
•
Attachment B
SECTION II: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT B, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE, OF
ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71, NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD
The Development Standards Table, previously attached as Exhibit B to Ordinance Number
07-71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit B,
Development Standards, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT C, MASTER PLAN, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER
07-71,NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD
The Master Plan, previously attached as Exhibit C to Ordinance Number 07-71, the Naples
Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit C, Master Plan,
attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION IV: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT F, LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS.FROM
LDC, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71. NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB
RPUD
The List of Requested Deviations from LDC, previously attached as Exhibit E to Ordinance
Number 07-71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new
Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations from LDC. attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
SECTION V: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT F. LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS, OF
ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71,NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD
The List of Developer Commitments, previously attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance Number
07-71, the Naples Reserve Golf'Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit F.
List of Developer Commitments,attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION VI: EFFECTIVE DATE
Except as amended herein. the remaining provisions within Collier County Ordinance No.
07-71 remain in full force and effect. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the
Department of State.
Naples Reserve/PL201 1-1 168 Page 2 of 3
Rev.4/20/12
Words stuck th h are deleted: words underlined are added.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this d y of `S(A ,2012,
ATTE;S1 ; `"")
� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BRRK, CLERK COLLIER.COUNTY, FLORIDA•
•
--,L pittylCle k FRED COYLE, Chairman
Wilk
.-1IC;I► r 4
itirw are. .
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
A! t_
even T, Williams 5,f,,.r
Assistant County Attorney tii I
Attachments: Exhibit A—List of Allowable Uses
Exhibit B—Development Standards
Exhibit C —Master Plan
Exhibit E—List of Requested Deviations
Exhibit F—List of Developer Commitments
11-CPS-01115/18
This ordinance filed with the
Secretary of State's Offic'fi fhe
k: uay of ...-Vy ......., ... QI _.,
and acknowledgement of,that
filincnreceiv d,hip . _- c.y
°f 77 1r`'�' Fa' t G, . �,
Nr,,,P cte.
Naples Reserve/PL201 1-1 168 Page 3 of 3
Rev.4/20/12
Words steuek-tlh attt#h are deleted; words underlined are added.
}
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS
TYPE UNlTS!FT. ACREAGE±
TRACT"R" RESIDENTIAL 1154 592.8
TRACT"RA" RECREATION AREA 0 3L6
TRACT"P" PRESERVE 0 63.7
TOTAL: 688.1
TRACT R PERMI FED USES;
No building or structure, or part thereof. shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole
or in part,for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
1) Single-family detached dwellings:
2) Single-family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee simple
conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence);
3) Villaipatio dwellings (detached single-family dwellings of a smaller scale than
the typical single-family detached dwelling);
4) Multi-family dwellings:
5) Model homes;
6) Commercial excavations for all lakes identified as "L" on Exhibit C RPUD
Master Plan (subject to Exhibit F: List of Developer Commitments.
Transportation hem D);
7) Project sales, construction and administrative offices, which inay occur in
residential,and`or in temporary structures.
8) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the Ibregoing list of
permitted principal uses,as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals("I3ZA")
by the process outlined in the Land Development Code(LDC).
•
Naples Reserve ft-20110001168 06107:2012 Page I of I
B. Accessory Uses:
•
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses
and structures.including,but not limited to:
1) Customary accessory uses and structures including,but not limited to,private
garages. swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures. gatehouses.
and other outdoor recreation facilities:
2) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor ot'Elections.
II TRACT RA PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall he erected. altered or used, or land used, in whole
or in part.for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses Typically Accessory to Residential Development:
I) Structures intended to provide social and recreational space(private. intended for
use by the residents and their guest only);
2) Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool. tennis and
basketball courts, playground improvements/facilities, and passive and/or active
water features.
3) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted principal uses,as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals("I3ZA")
by the process outlined in the LDC.
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses
and structures, including. but not limited to:
i) Customary accessory uses or structures incidental to recreation areas and. or
facilities, including structures constructed for purposes of maintenance. storage
or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping.
Naples Reserve Pl..-20I I 000 168 06;0T2012 Pale 2 of I f
•
EXHIBIT B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
GENERAL: Development of The Naples Reserve RPUD shall he in accordance with the contents of this
Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in
effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, subdivision plat, site
development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations
relate, Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most
similar district in the LDC shall apply.
Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to
individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners'
association boundaries shall not he utilized for determining development standards.
Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Residential PUD Residential
Subdistrict(Tract "R"). Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable
sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
MAXIMUM DENSITY:
There shall be no more than 1 154 residential dwelling units permitted which provides for a maximum
gross density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre. A minimum of 612 Transfer of Development Rights Credits
shall be obtained to achieve the maximum gross density.
SIGNS
For the purposes of this RPUD, the LDC provisions from Section 5.06.02.B,6. are applicable for off-
premise signage. Please see Deviation #2 in Exhibit E. This otT-site signage opportunity may only be
implemented after such signage is allowed in the Walnut Lakes PLO.
Naples Reserve PI:201 10001 168 06.07/2012 Page 3 of 11
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY PATIO HOME MULTI- CLUBHOUSES
DETACHED ATTACHED& &VILLAS FAMILY RECREATION
TOWNHOUSE BUILDINGS
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES 1 _._.._......._. �_.__ _.__ _ ( i
F7ZNInnum175-1-kfiEA 6,000 S.F.PER 2,250 S.F.PER 5,000 S.F.PER 2,250 S.F.PER f 10,000 S.F.
1 _ UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
MAXIMUM LOT AREA 1 Acre r N/A N/A N/A N/A j
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET N/A
l MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F./D.U. N/A
MIN FRONT YARD 20 FEET* 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET* 25 FEET
fMIN SIDE YARD 6 FEET 0 FEET or 3 FEET or GREATER OF 10 GREATER OF
6 FEET 9 FEET** FEET OR 1/2 BH 15 FEET OR /
BH,
MIN REAR YARD 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET GREATER OF 15
FEET OR 1/2 BH 1;
MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET
MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET GREATER OF 20 GREATER OF 15
STRUCTURES jyu-_... FEET QR B THE FEET OR % BH
SUM OF BH
EE— .....__ _—"...__ EE ...... - — _-.,_
—
MAX.BUILDING HEIGHr NQT 35 FEET a0 FEET 35 FEET 55 FEET 50 FEET
TO EXCEED ZONED
MAX,BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 45 FEET 50 FEET 145 FEET ' 65 FEET 60 FEET
TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) I
_ 1
...
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES— �—
FRONT S.P.S. S.P.SPS
S.P.S. S.P.S. 20 FEET
SIDE S.P.S. S.P.S. S,P.S. S.P.s. v,BH
REAR(ATTACHED)— 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 10 FEET —
(DEl'ACHED) 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET
PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET
MINIMUM DISTANCE _— 12 FEET 12 _.......
FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET Greater of 15
BETWEEN STRUCTURES feet or'/ BH
MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 40 FEET
TO EXCEED(ZONED
MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 45 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET f 45 FEET 150 FEET
TO EXCEED(ACTUAL)
S.P.S.=Some os Principal Structures
BH = Budding Height unless otherwise noted,all building heights shall be"zoned" building heights,as defined in the LDC.
':Residences with side loaded garages may have a minimum I S foot front yard
**: A three(3')foot setback shall be permitted only where time(9'1 feet is provided on the adjacent lot.
Naples Reserve P1.-301 10001 168 06:07/2012 Page 4 of'(1
i
•
Notes:
1) No structures are permitted in the required 20-foot lake maintenance easement. No setback is required
for structures adjacent to a lake maintenance easement. •
2) Side yards•-No side yard shall be required between units internal to a structure, when more than one
residential unit is in a single structure (i.e.: attached single-family and townhouses). Varying side
yards are provided to allow side entry garages and to maintain the required separation between
buildings.
3) Terraced setbacks are permitted for either two or three story multi-family structures. Setbacks shall be
measured from that ground floor exterior wall of lesser height as long as a minimum 15 foot building
wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure I below.
4) Entrance features (i.e.: monuments, clock towers and colonnades) may be located at the project
entrance and shall be limited to a maximum height of 50 feet.
5) For all residential units,garages must be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk
located in the street rights-of-way closest to the garage,except for side load garages,wherein a parking
area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to avoid vehicles being parked
across a portion,or all of the referenced sidewalk.
i
'''lam\ `I ,, ` ''f y.
I
;I.W.k [ : ; " i 11 oil,. H . O
1
. — . �I; — = — s! I ' 1
.I I
i . 11 j
Figure l
Naples Reserve PE-20I10001168 06/07/2012 Page S of 11
. .
. .
EXHIBIT C
MASTER PLAN
_
_____
.. . _
.... ..,.....
.......................
1 ..
. RAM..wrILItYll A VnI140
- r‘.1.1.-Lrt...vburrin
-U
. „.. ...... , - .. ..., _........ .._...— .....-...... .......---... '
r , :
-;-\• '.-
(71r'''''.''' ''.e73'. ,; i*..• 7,:,,)••••: ••.:A.
.., •,,;‘, .-.1. .15t.-;,•;-,--4,-.,•-•-•-,---• -%.,'..,:, .4.,,,..'.-. ,,,,---,■.k.,---,-,.,-...',.i.:,,:.'j
i :2: • • ••,.
% .
Ar-: ;--''-'• .
A; .
...,A.
'
+.; , .,' •
„..VN:
1 7,- ...ys..... ...... ,.. „.. ,,,
. ._, ,:....4.,•., •-•.'7•:' - \ :,-•;..
••1
V'y
i 6'1 ..:.• , . I,, ;•-.1:!._
■ ,.- . •••,:-, ■•••,:-::.":..,•;:::,, c:,.. .,;'.,.'.'::!1:'.. ."..../.,;e:;/' ----4--,--IF . .._
1, •;!
.,
1.1::,:-.-.;;;,!..e2 .:•-::;,,) .. ,-, •0"
• 9! . 7 '..;....+ •..';:ii:0".7,),‘,.; ,./...' :i.,./..-7...:,;:,:-.4: /: ,•-; .--..1.
• 51.44. ,.: ,..... ,‘:.:'•;' ',;.Zi,.,-"., ,..: ,.,,,.'.!'!,;',..',3,' ' •-'-'4"- -,,
"-=.1 .';•;,`...,.....•—'' -: i,
:...!.:,_.. ...,,/............. );.--c: C....,..., ■,••...(
,...,".. ..... di r .•
, ,.....;.-^,"7 ',..,,,:-..,,,kit`',",.•!,..•
z•
. , .....,:::'•••':. i„,:":::•77::••.**..... ,4•••!.... ', i'•:;,',.,.:,,,, .. .f•,,')
.._.,.,
, , ,_ ....__:....,A:.,. ........,,,...,-,-,.. ,:,,, , . .
t . .,., 4,
■ . ,-
, t,f ir '1 4
7..,..7.,.., / , t ..•1 ;1'
,f.lk ,... ''%."•-'-.--4"-..,,.'", il --- , 4
1 " =
' ...,----77—:-.'•-.'.- -` '\,. . ,•'''/!:::-...•... „-..:•(,, -:•:/,..• . -\..,„1 ..:::!.,! ,-.. 7,': , ,.::(, ,:t
:. „71;;•..S,-
..,
',X. 0\''''. \\N‘*..:-....,„ ,,. ., ...,.... ...
..':'.
:' -,..4. • N'A I-1.,:' a g
I \"...4.4.,f4... .s.,,'.. -Z7:- ''' ---'-'<" •.•--
''. 72:'' '') 1 \ _...--
•, ,, -•'• • rt.,- ''' ''. V--";'--- NC..i.,t.f.,..;,„11.,---TL,.::::,-,.. ."':'.
,-...-; ',.':
•zy : ' k. ,
..--
1 ,,,•• . .1, 1
r'''.- I:, :.r.--•.-k-..r.:" rit .•,,...- 1 r.:• ..-----1. , r.,,i.,vi ...
ril .....„-...„,..:. -,.. , , ...L '‘,....*1-:-,4 j /..i.!1'
----' --- •-•.:: •0 •‘r--- ''..-•
1 1 ,,, /. ,,c4'
" .,N.4 ...e"-t1.;_ 4
....,,,:.,C,...;;..... . • i...,;,-.:z
....,.)."
_.....„t,,, ,r,...,,.,,,,,,,::,,,,,,--.;:y., ,,r.
- .if„.., .....;:,,. , • ---7,-:::
. .
II I I 4" -',/
fi'D•4 /..... ,,'.' 4 - -% ,..----..:: y*A.,-..2... •--,...,..,--.A.,
. - r•:;,,--'''' •.4
iihill I • f',.,4—
, „,..;.. -2:-...,g,:if•••:••"1 „ri ,(.7...• :.•,—..-.J,',„ j..s. /r_ :,,•
.,,, ...■ ■V,-
,, ••• •
--,,,,,,- ,,,:, •
(7.7,'7-.7-1 •',:!!';'•
11 ..••/- '•••■.* 1,:?.! ., I ,
' 1..?..4 k• ". ,1?',., x ,li•.,4:-..I
• .:-, ... •,...
I ,-.• ,Ir. A.- ,:.•
i 1
.,. '4 , i.„.., :•.:•
II
il ,, hA r:_.c . ••••,-;
,.•:2,,,.
,_ •
. - ...I (1'
k:.-f.
. •
. ,,.. GREENWAY ROAD ■ .
II g' I (-; .i.. 0 •.'-' * ' '''1::f ki
,,,.;c.:• _.; 1 . ,,
4 It
.7,..0 :3 I - ' 4 A: :. ,,'• * :
f ...- .-. • -. • .
,,,z.• '.;1 • . • 6
x . 1
,'-i: • 1 . ; 1., -.:: . :I A ..,
_.
,. , •. , .
--%- •.: 1 .
. ..,
, ,, ,- ; . - , 4 •
:: ',-,*; - ' •''''':N\ .
i c. ....., , e, 4 -
. . -1. ei
I .7,aq A
i ! i 5 1 5: 1, 4 t .4 i 5i■; 2,
.... — ------....— ,,,,
•,; ,,....'t,', . 3 3 i k ,1,1,,-t (4 •.:,
4
ii 4
F.. K i
4
k.'
• -. .,.:1s. fl
• -.
i. y f• f 5. ' '' 1 i I M I I
i 1
, ■ i f-,
■
... I
......-...-.. ..„... -.... .........
Naples Reserve PL-201 10001 168 0610712012 Page 6 of II
4,,
EXHIBIT D
Legal Description
All of Section I,Township 51 South. Range 26 East,Collier County. Florida
•
Naples Reserve PL-20110001168 06.'07..2012 Page 7 of I 1
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC
Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c., that limits the number of model homes to
allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the project. The number of
model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a
total of tifjeen.
Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 8.6. that allows ground/residential entrance signage
only on-site within residential zoning districts, to allow ground/residential entrance signage outside of the
residential zoning district that the signage will serve. This off-site ground/residential entrance signage •
shall be permitted in close proximity to the US-41 Right-of-Way within the Walnut Lakes PUD. This
deviation may only be implemented upon such signage being allowed by the Walnut Lakes Nil).
Naples Reserve PL-20110001 168 06/07;2012 Page 8 of t I
•
•
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
TRANSPORTATION
The development of this RPUI)shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions:
4. The RPUD Master Plan reflects a (00' wide reservation for dedication along the western
boundary of the RPUD. Should the County find that it is appropriate to improve that corridor,the
Developer, its successor, or assigns shall agree to be a pall of a joint permit application with
Collier County for the specific purpose of modifying the existing conservation easement. All
costs associated with the potential conservation easement modification. including any required
mitigation shall be the responsibility of the County. The 100' reservation shall he dedicated to
the County at no cost. and in fee simple title within 180 days of the County's request. The
developer shall provide a storm water management system within the RPUD boundary for
treatment/retention of storm water from the 100 foot reservation area,
B. The Developer agrees to provide mitigation for traffic impacts as detailed in the companion
Developer's Contribution Agreement 'DCA] in order to provide consistency with policy 5.1 of
the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan." The DCA provides for
improvements to the intersection of US--ti and Collier Boulevard. and/or US-41 east of Collier
Boulevard,
C. If warranted and approved by the County.the developer shall he responsible for the proportionate
fair share cost of a traffic signal. or turn lane extension/expansion, at the intersection of Naples
Reserve Boulevard and IJS41 Tamiami Trail. if Naples Reserve Boulevard should become a
Public Roadway in the future, then the proportionate share requirement shall apply to this
development's entrance where it intersects with Naples Reserve Boulevard. Upon completion of
the installation, inspection, burn-in period and final approval/acceptance of traffic signal at either
location mentioned in the previous paragraph, ownership and maintenance of the signal shall be
turned over to Collier County. Any negotiations relevant to fair share payments or
reimbursements from any and all other neighboring developers/property owners that directly
benefit from said traffic signal,will be determined based upon the percentage of usage/impact,"
D. Excavated material in an amount up to ten percent (to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards)of the
total volume excavated may be removed from the development with no prohibition as to the
destination of the material. Excavated material in excess of up to ten percent (to a maximum of
20,000 cubic yards)of the total volume excavated. may be removed from the development and be
transported off-site only for use in the US-41 roadway widening project from the intersection of
US 41 and Collier Boulevard to the intersection of US 41 and CR 92, and subject to the
excavation provisions from the Code of Ordinances as may be amended. however the following
paragraph will continue to apply:
"Issuance of commercial excavation pennits. Applications for commercial excavation permits
shall he reviewed by the community development and environmental services administrator, or
his designee,and by the environmental advisory council for recommendation and approved by the
board, When a request is made to remove surplus fill material from a previously approved
development excavation, the requirement for review by the environmental advisory council shall
be waved. but dependent on haul route and amount of till to he hauled,staff may require approval
by Collier County Planning Commission."
k. At project huildout. a secondary access point for resident use shall be provided off of Greenway
Road.
Naples Reserve PL-20110001168 (16/07%20 t2 Page 9 of 11
ENVIRONMENTAL
The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall he subject to and governed by the
following conditions:
A. The Naples Reserve RPUD shall preserve 63,7 acres of vegetated areas consistent with the Land
Use Summary on Exhibit C RPUD Master Plan.
PLANNING
.1. In order to increase residential density above the base density allowed in the Urban-Mixed Use
District,Residential Fringe Subdistrict and the Agricultural/Rural-Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District,Receiving Lands,612 TDR Credits shall be severed from qualifying Sending Lands;of
which a minimum of 31 i TDR Credits shall be severed from Sending Lands within one mile of
the Urban Area.
B. One entity(hereinafter the Managing Entity)shall he responsible for PUT)monitoring until close-
out of the PUD,and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until
close-out of the PUD, At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is SFl Naples
Reserve,LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to
a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be
approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval,the Managing Entity
will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the
successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts. the
Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the
commitments required by the PUT)by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply
with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be
relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUI.) are closed-out, then the
Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD
commitments,
C. Construction of the clubhouse will commence prior to the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy(CC)) for the 23I'residential dwelling unit.
WATER MANAGEMENT
A. Constructed drainage facilities and structures shall he located outside the boundaries of
conservation easements/preserves.
13. The project's stormwater management system shall he designed to fully contain the 100-year/72-
hour design storm event with a regulated discharge rate not to exceed 0.08 cfs/acre and no
increase in total volume of discharge.
C. All elevations shall be based on the North American Vertical Datum(NAVD).
UTILiTIES AND ENGINEERING
A. The owner shall reserve four areas to potentially be dedicated to the Collier County Water-Sewer
District for raw water well easements with dimensions of 100-foot by 100-foot each, along with
utility/access easements that shall be 20 feet wide,or less if the well site is contiguous to a public
right-of-way. The approximate locations of these tour proposed easements arc depicted on the
Naples Reserve Pl.-20110001168 06/07'2012 Page 10 of 1 t
proposed Master Plan. One of these four wells may he used as a test well and converted to a
production well. The test well will not be converted into a production well until the water
management lakes proposed near the test well are constructed in accordance with the 50 foot
setback standard, No additional production wells will be installed until the project's water
management lakes have been constructed or the year 2027.whichever is earlier.
Upon request of the Collier County Water- Sewer District, the owner shall convey to the Collier
County Water- Sewer District the requested utility/access easements and raw water well
easements within 60 days, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The Collier County
Water- Sewer District shall pay the owner$15.930 per acre for those easements that are conveyed
or dedicated to the Collier County Water- Sewer District If all or some of the conveyances have
not been requested by the Collier County Water-Sewer District at the earlier of Site Development
Plan ("SDP") and/or final construction plans and plat ("PPL") approval or within six years of
approval of this Ordinance,then the reserved areas shall be deemed released.
At the time of the SDP and/or PPL submittal, the owner shall show the well site reservations
applicable to the area within the SDP and/or plat. During the review of the SDP and/or PPL, the
Collier County Water- Sewer District shall decide at that time whether it will request the
dedication of the utility/access easement, Failure to request the utility/access easement shall be
deemed a release of the utility/access easement and the final SDP and/or PPL shall he approved
without the utility/access easement,
Naples Reserve PL-20 I I 0001 163 06:07/2012 Page I i of l l
STATE OF Ft 0RIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT F. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct
copy of:
ORDINANCE 2012-29
which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on the 24th day of July, 2012, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 26th
day of July, 2012 .
DWIGHT E. BROCc,V4"3..
Clerk of Coursiss d C14k
Ex-officio t,o.s'oard-of
County Commissioners
By: Martha Vergara,�
Deputy Clerk
•
202728293 •
rs` O,2l
��} \N ORDINANCE NO.07-71
(N 1\1�O w AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
� %� ` v COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
\�<< `'co Q' AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS •
\9[S/b1.66ZO AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND -
DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, --' •
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING _
ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING --�
CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL • ;11
PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT .7)
(PUD)ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR
THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE NAPLES RESERVE GOLF
CLUB RPUD BY ADDING 602 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
UNITS,FOR A TOTAL OF 1154 RESIDENTIAL UNITS,FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED ONE MILE NORTH OF US 41 AND I
1/2 MILES EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951), IN
SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 688+/-
ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE
NUMBER 99-42, THE FORMER NAPLES RESERVE GOLF
CLUB PUD;AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 99-42
establishing the Naples Reserve Golf Club PUD;and
WHEREAS,by Resolution No, 04-219,the Board of County Commissioners extended
the PUD approval affecting Ordinance No.99-42 until June 8,2008;and
. WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc.,representing Anthony Salce of Gulf Coast
Development Group,LC,petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning
classification of the herein described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 1,
Township 51 South, Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida,is changed from a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)
Zoning District for the project known as Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD in accordance with
the Exhibits attached hereto as Exhibits A through F. The appropriate zoning atlas map or
maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land
Development Code,is/are hereby amended accordingly.
Page 1 of 2
•
Attachment C
•
SECTION TWO;
Ordinance Number 99-42, known as the Naples Reserve Golf Club PUD, adopted on
June 8, 1999, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in
its entirety.
SECTION THREE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this 13 day of Nod evnblf,2007.
,,,iwyrir,,,
A C�ts9 �'A�,�., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
:.N IGHT 1r''SI K,CLERK COLLIER CO TY, aRIDA
B
Attest Deputy Clerk JA S COLEITA,CHAIRMAN
,
as to Chi}rein t
rKy0J:14.r6 041 1
Approved as to form
and sufficiency:
!y 4.4 ,LA�- 'rGt9 �1
Marjori7 aM•Student-Stirling
Assistant County Attorney
Exhibit A–List of Allowable Uses
Exhibit B--Development Standards Table
Exhibit C–Master Plan
Exhibit D–Legal Description
Exhibit B–List of Requested Deviations
Exhibit F–Development Commitments
This ordinance filed with the
4,apciary of Sttotee'ss Offti.c t e
day of1MJt •-
and acknowledgem-1 , _that
filin• =, i e. this / day
of . 1ui 'P1
Oa, rk,
Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT A
Table I
PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS
HYPE UNITS/FT. ACREAGE±
TRACT"RG" RESIDENTIAL 1154 609.2
TRACT"RA" RECREATION AREA 0 15.2
TRACT"P" PRESERVE 0 63.7
TRACT RG PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or in part,for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses;
1) Single-family detached dwellings;
2) Single-family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee
simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence);
3) Villa/patio dwellings (detached single-family dwellings of a smaller scale
than the typical single-family detached dwelling);
4) Multi-family dwellings;
5) Model homes; •
6) Golf courses and related facilities;
7) Commercial excavations -- surplus full material generated by commercial
excavation depths may be transported off-site only for use in the US-41
improvement project associated with this zoning approval;
$). Project sales, construction and administrative offices, which may occur in
'residential,and/or in temporary.
9) Any°bther principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
list of'Permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning
Appeals (`13ZA")by the process outlined in the Land Development Code
(LDC).
A-I
•
B. Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal
uses and structures,including,but not limited to:
1) Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to,
private garages, swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures,
gatehouses,and other outdoor recreation facilities;
2) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections.
II TRACT RA PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or in part,for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses Typically Accessory to Residential Development:
1) Structures intended to provide social and recreational space (private,
intended for use by the residents and their guest only),
2) Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis
and basketball courts, playground improvements/facilities, and passive
and/or active water features.
3) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning
Appeals("BZA")by the process outlined in the LOC.
B. • Accessory Uses:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and
structures,including,but not limited to:
1) Customary accessory uses or structures incidental to recreation areas and,or
facilities, including structures constructed for purposes of maintenance,
storage or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping.
III DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. GENERAL: Development of The Naples Reserve RPUD shall be in accordance
with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County
LDC and Growth Management Plan(GMP)in effect at the time of issuance of any
development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site
development plan,excavation permit,and preliminary work authorization,to which
such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental
standards,then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply.
A-2
Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be
in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. •
Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for
determining development standards.
There shall be no more than 1154 residential dwelling units permitted which
provides for a maximum gross density of 1.67 dwelling units pre acre. A minimum
of 612 Transfer of Development Rights Credits shall be obtained to achieve the
maximum gross density.
B. Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the
Residential PUD Residential Subdistrict, Standards not specifically set forth herein
shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of
approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat.
IV SIGNS
For the purposes of this RPUD,the LDC provisions from Section 5.06.02.A.6.are
• applicable for off-premise signage.
A-3
•
EXHIBIT B
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DEYELO.PMENT STANIaARl sir ' .:_: E-t4NMAT.; SING E F:*+111;Y _ .PAtIO•HOM Iy1;Ui.`fF; ; ;i i CLUi37i0USEf ;
• .; • DETptHEb. Alt kiiEL& :' IA'VILLAS FAMILY r' RECREATIO
,ii;' TO9119.40CIBt.._I';;;',.. . -` ;:K,BUIE'1}jN6t,
1,!.WOW$TRI;j0TS1tr; S'
MINIMUM LOT AREA 2,250 S,F.PER 2,250 S.F.PER 2,250 S.F.PER 2,250 S.F.PER 10,000 S.F.
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT _
MAXIMUM LOT AREA 1 Acre N/A N/A ~N/A N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F./D.U. N/A
MIN FRONT YARD 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET N/A
MIN SIDE YARD 6 FEET 0 FEET or 3 FEET or GREATER OF 10 N/A
6 FEET 9 FEET FEET OR rh BH
MIN REAR YARD 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET N/A
MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET
MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET GREATER OF 20 N/A
STRUCTURES FEET OR 1 THE
SUM OF BH
MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 35 FEET 40 FEET 35 FEET 65 FEET 50 FEET
LTO EXCEED _ (ACTUAL)
AC
C E M1
t
1
0. .t
, r • 4
� " t i
:<,,,,,,:_... •.i , ^ . :•:: - . '1 -• ,..�}' s ( t 1
..
FRONT S.P.S. S.P.S.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. 20 FE ET
SIDE S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. CIA BH ,
REAR(ATTACHED) 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 3 FEET 10 FEET
(DETACHED) 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET •
PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET
MINIMUM DISTANCE 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET Greater of 15
BETWEEN STRUCTURES feet or Ili BH
MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 40 FEET
TO EXCEED
S.P.S.=Same as Principal Structures
BH=Building Height—unless otherwise noted,all building heights shall be"zoned"building heights,as defined in the LDC.
B-1
Notes:
1) No structures are permitted in the required 20-foot lake maintenance easement No setback is required
for structures adjacent to a lake maintenance easement.
2) Side yards—No side yard shall be required between units when more than one residential unit Is in a
single structure(i.e.:attached single-family and townhomes). Varying side yards are provided to allow
side entry garages and to maintain the required separation between buildings.
3) The LAC standards for cluster residential design,as set forth in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District,
shall apply to residential land uses within this RPUD.
4) Terraced setbacks are permitted for either two or three story multi-family structures.Setbacks shall be
measured from that ground floor exterior wall of lesser height as long as a minimum 15 foot building
wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below.
5) Entrance features(i.e.:monumentation,clock towers and colonnades)shall be limited in height to no
greater than 50 feet which may be located at the project entrance.
6) For all residential units,garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk
closest to the garage, except for side load garages,wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be
provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to avoid vehicles being parked across a portion,or all of the
referenced sidewalk.
PROPERTY
U ,s'MX _
= 0 1:=1=,
eU Figure 1
B-2
EXHIBIT C
MASTER PLAN
..._..
. .
..muilliwiliz::::xlimpufflr, afro-Cialfe
r '1":... l• • - • •'.• ,
I.I'T„1114:;',.i'', ,IL:.1,..r:1!''''''.v.A. ::;1riA: I i7LI'V'. ...it;411/1. • ! •.. '
it-,..P.1. l•:rglili".1:-:..;1'.',1:0',11;t1:1,f1:ill 0;1.!Iqt ..,,. i.l.ii . .
1
,
1 '•14'.1 ..);,:::;.:::ilif rq. :''qi"
il '.I. 11,01 ,,,„,i.,.11-....ii.orp14.i.1).I„ii•'.11)',:. 1111.14.!;Wt. Pl.) I I
I, k't• '.. ...•,11/2,;;•', :1,.1:l'.. ...!?1 •,!,-1. .1..)) • ltilif"7)1'P:4 iLi'.r./.. '
i'Attlit19....„ e.,4:11,.,(i'),:.:r.
ilk'11,4! i )..-• 4)11 ' •: '141'j• f6
...01..F..1. -•.1■ 1,-.1A. i
11 04..t....;::•11 t ! Wil1 "..1 I.
.r.... ....I-,,. : . •-.1 ,,,. ., 1..• • . it 4,,...141....1
z.ei01•;'21.3•At
.. .
:: t •.' •
. , 1.'17. ..1".••• . . ?et •': ' • '
. 11!'••l' 'I'..'i'''; 1;4.i.?•,..,,i, ' I I
It: .1 ...; :4'1'1•.:.; ij!,..1. ...I. 1 ...
II ..
.. • . .
‘1....-...-i ' 1 le:..e4. '.!!I.,' 'IP i‘g 3 ., .
'1/0 • i• .:. 41.F. '.'•••.:■ ' i.1 ,;:'... ei of .. ,..,.
'..1•• 1 1
l'h.!..." •..t. !. r.• ■';' ,•.'.1gr..,I
14.!,lo„,•.''.1.1'.4,1... - It.i.:.'.' 11.11.%: II
( '.1:1'....lif.•.;'..ii.-I
( w„,.,.•,....:,.: ..........
1:1 I ..,i ? I' ':.NI
i.:-.... ko,...em. 4..,.. i, . . • ; '
6° iti4)) . t.41 , i ". :•i
41'4:1 V.:.
iit;00'o:ice's. -..V. . ' .....'7.
1
I •I'4'' Illitli • .001.!
• 1,IA 10.041'II..<...T Ir. . •, •.1 :41 t'..1.P.-..,4.1k.41.t 11 ,. •..:..:,• ..„.,„ . . . -),
-11--11.144:04i1.-0,41; .-.,-'i r"")"• d'':tis• ...:-..ti, •• ' ''''i.'"'' , '•'d' . • j•Wig,. .
• ),L !,,i.",roilfir.,„.1..i..,..1 ... •••4;4 , ,-..- . : r, .
1 , 4.11140.--3;t1:‘•1 .1...1.14:..• (
.,..• ..I .: , (• 1... 14.
'.;...."•:.1■1•':1:jr.1....!"-17:' ' I.
•...1 ,••1 .,,, •
i •,'• $'.!.',.. • /4• i '
-•'111. I rj •::!••:.■1 . .r NI':• II
'4.1. j1",:1!' I.I"I.,...;.; .....•."..1 ii.1 1 . I • .I I : • - '''114 ,
.0.1.41 , i. A.1,4 2.:;10;1,:ii.■,. 1i1 i i 41: 1
-.1.;'.•a.'"1• : '..v.' hi XI 4,I.y. . 4 .•.1
. al;lio.„...,0,....,.,,,.., L.•0...,•,..-4,J,..,,, ,
..41,-...•+!1■Vi.:1..'7....•;,'"....,'4 0' 1 . • 1; •
°.11 ' I • r 1. . .'i . r'. - • • ..,
„,„....13I: ::10 l'.!...1•1411:',....3:1;11.1.:.'4 I:1 . : I
loill '...;') si."Pr.,'4"1,1F.:IrcifilF.? citt.:i.'•;,,t, .'.4 I , •I. I, I it I..'
'7
cH:,.1 (.4. yi.1 ji. ,1, 4:11.1 Alf il 1 .
* t - '
11..ri...;iill' '.'"-.4,..i1... .'.1 41 I..' Li ii.1. t,.• - ' t .1
r.??•11.:!•11...1111;:11•Ititii........ 1,7....4L,t,.II ..;: . • t,
. 't.t.;.,:;,,....!.,......J•.11.11.t.. .0,,L,Ilte.t.o... vl .I. •-. , • .
.
.1: i.)11•..1.•!'..t..17.1: ::.;'•..... ,....4., !•;rt.....,t4 ,...-. 41,
• if.'' -!4,... .12,;.,.,.11
4. •
• , . . .- . . :--, .. .11!•.. ' .... ;'1 .1 '
VII 1 '..1(.411,'. 1,"..11.',.1 'i • ... j.
rr. 11 II el.,01-111,..11....1.-.'
i ,-..4. •,.;.'1.4 1 1,...,-.z,..
1
. , 1 a..,,i..;,.', •L,-1-450. •,„:,I. . , ...,,.... . .. , .,,. '', . ...
..2T ,.., magAr--...1 !1!.-44111:.!_ -
1 41 E 1, ii. - t 'I I Illid•
.
I •
•
,,•$' I',Alt . .. ,_.... P• , 4. i- 'N a
/ ii.•
,, , ,..
, ....am*, it#1.,41 i i it*
ill tiri . g ri-
IN - muff
'Rum- l',...., 1-4
. ,, , iii;- , .. §... ..ii, „.. . * 1 44
i ixt
:.., ; 0 iKt;iim. :
141 .,
.
,.' s:' :',,
r' I: : ,
n! i i k tr.(111firinkIllait.-1V
0 :
i
1! 1 i ' . 1 P, 4!.! , it. till' , immikiii
.
,•oi
...4.1-.
-•.
7" IICSA"k.:1
V J. '• i iiiii, :.1. 'I ; 4 1 417 1
r
:_•.,. ., •.,
:
I
tit/
/ MI
g - t
i.k.,..
lArril
MIMIC !If lial, irrAmil
., • •
. .. 1711.' .. ' itkagiMane ird . ..
-itimi.4 •Iti.fh
400*. t*for:
rposol.k dIrt* "c' lattadaYSif&AS .N..4P-.1-64*UD I"' MA:,Gl*taii
•
EXHIBIT D
Legal Description
All of Section 1,Township 51 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida
EXHIBIT E
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC
Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06,01.(0), for "cul-de-sac and local streets, and LDC
Appendix B,Typical Street Section,B-2 and B-3,and Section III,Exhibit"A",Design Requirements for
Subdivisions C.13.e. of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual
adopted through Ordinance No.2004-66 that requires 60 feet,to allow 50 feet.A 50-foot right-of-way is
permitted in this RPUD to provide for flexibility in development design,subject to providing easements
for required utilities generally parallel to the right-of-way. This is a reasonable deviation that has been
implemented in subdivisions throughout the County,and does not compromise health,safety,and welfare
issues related to civil engineering design.
All platted project streets shall have a minimum 50-foot right-of-way. Deviation 1 from Sub-section
6.06,01(0)of the LDC, for cul-de-sac and local streets,and LDC Appendix B-2 and B-3 for cul-de-sac
and local streets respectively,and Section III,Exhibit"A",Design Requirements for Subdivisions C.13.e.
of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through
Ordinance No. 2004-66 which requires 60 feet to allow 50 feet. (See Exhibit C,RPUD Master Plan),
These streets shall be private,and shall be classified as local streets.
Deviation#2 seeks relief from Section III,Exhibit"A",Design Requirements of Subdivisions C.13 j. of
the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance
Number 2004-66,that requires tangents to be provided between reverse curves on all streets. This RPUD
will not require tangents between reverse curves in order to provide greater subdivision design flexibility. .
All internal roads within the RPUD will be private, and have low posted speed limits, and will have a
curvilinear design that has been shown to act as traffic calming measures by reducing local traffic speeds.
Additionally, the flat terrain found on site does not warrant the need for tangents. This is a reasonable
deviation that has been applied throughout the County, and does not comprise a risk to public health,
safety and welfare.
Tangents between reverse curves are not required for any local street design in this RPUD.Deviation 2
from Section III,Exhibit"A",Design Requirements for Subdivisions C.13 j. of the Administrative Code
for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance No.2004-66.
Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c,,that functionally limits the number of model
homes to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the project. In an
effort to provide a variety of residence styles and floor plans within the development,it is essential not to
arbitrarily limit the opportunity of a home buyer to see the creativity of the architecture proposed in a
development. To do so could result in monotonous tract housing reminiscent of the "new town"
movement after the end of the World War 11.This deviation is appropriate,and dots not negatively affect
the health and safety,nor welfare of the future residents of the development.
The Naples Reserve RPUD may have one model home representing each type of residential product. The
number of model homes may exceed five, but shall not exceed a total of ten. Deviation 3 from LDC
Section 5.04.04.13.5.e.that limits the total number of model homes in a single development to five.
E-1
Deviation#4 seeks relief from Section 111,Exhibit"A",Design Requirements of Subdivisions C.13.f.of
the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance
Number 2004-66,limits cul-de-sac lengths to 1000 feet or less. This RPUD may have cul-de-sacs with
lengths greater than 1000 feet. The RPUD lands are relatively without topographic relief,so greater sight
distances would allow longer dead-end streets without jeopardizing the safety of the future residents.
Further,the turning radii of the terminal cul-de-sacs will meet or exceed applicable County and National
Fire Protection Association requirements.
Cul-de-sac lengths in the Naples Reserve RPUD may exceed 1000 feet.
•
•
E-2
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
TRANSPORTATION
The development of this RPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions:
A. All traffic control devices, signs,pavement marking, and design criteria shall be in accordance
with the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards
(MUMS),current edition,FDOT Design Standards,current edition,and the Manual On Uniform
Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD),current edition.
B. Access Points shown on the RPUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing
depicted on any such Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any
property boundary. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number
depicted on the Master Plan; however,no additional access points shall be considered unless a
PUD amendment is approved.
C. Site-related improvements (as opposed to system-related improvements) necessary for safe
ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for
impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior
to commencement of on-site construction.
D. Nothing in any development order(DO) shall vest a right of access in excess of a right-in/right-
out condition at any access point. Neither shall thc existence of a point of ingress, a point of
egress,or a median opening,nor the lack thereof,be the basis for any future cause of action for
damages against the County by the developer,its successor in title,or assignee. Collier County
reserves the right to close any median opening existing at any time which is found to be adverse
to the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on,but
not limited to,safety,operational circulation,and roadway capacity.
E. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County rights-of-way or
easement(s),then compensating right-of-way shall be provided at no cost to Collier County as a
consequence of such improvement(s)upon final approval of the turn lane design during the first
subsequent development order(i.e.: site development plan/subdivision plat). The typical cross-
section may not differ from the existing roadway unless approved, in writing, by the
Transportation Division Administrator,or his designee.
F. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, traffic signal(s), other traffic control device, sign,
pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement, or site-related
umprovements(as opposed to system related improvements)necessary for safe ingress and egress
to this project, as determined by Collier County,is determined to be necessary,the cost of such
improvement shall be the responsibility of the developer, its successors or assigns. The
improvements shall be paid for or installed,at the County's discretion,prior to the issuance of the
first CO.
F-1
G. The RPUD Master PIan reflects a 100' wide reservation for dedication along the western
boundary of the RPUD. Should the County find that it is appropriate to improve that corridor,
the Developer,its successor,or assigns shall agree to be a part of a joint permit application with
Collier County for the specific purpose of modifying the existing conservation easement. All
costs associated with the potential conservation easement modification, including any required
mitigation shall be the responsibility of the County. The 100' reservation shall be dedicated to
the County at no cost, and in fee simple title within 180 days of the County's request. The
developer shall provide a storm water management system within the RPUD boundary for
treatment/retention of storm water from the 100 foot reservation area.
UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING
The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the
following conditions:
A. The developer shall reserve four areas to be dedicated to Collier County Water&Sewer District
for raw water well easements with dimensions 100-foot by 100-foot each, and utility/access
easements that shall be 20 feet wide unless the well site is contiguous to a public right of way.
The approximate locations of these proposed easements are depicted on the RPUD Master Plan.
The dedication shall occur at the time of site development plan,or final plat approval for the area
within the development phase that contains the respective well sites.
At the time of the SDP and/or plat submittal,the developer shall provide the well site easements
that meet the standard setback requirements for water wells. If the surface water management
lakes for the subdivision are installed prior to the installation of production wells for the
SERWTP Welifield, anticipated for 2012, a setback of 50 feet shall be required. If the surface
water management lakes are installed after the production wells a 300-foot setback shall be
required.
The County has further requested a test well at one of the proposed well sites.The County agrees
that the desired test well will not,be converted into a production well until the water management
lake proposed near the test well is constructed in accordance with the 50 foot setback
standard.No additional production wells will be installed until the project's water management
lakes have been constructed or the year 2012,whichever is earlier.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the
following conditions:
A. The Naples Reserve RPUD shall preserve 63.7 acres of vegetated areas consistent with the Land
Use Summary on the RPUD Master Plan.
F-2
PLANNING
A. One TDR credit shall be required for every five(5)gross acres of RFMUD land area utilized as
part of the golf course, including the clubhouse area, rough, fairways, greens, and lakes, but
excluding any area dedicated as conservation that is non-irrigated and retained in a natural state.
13. In order to increase residential density above the base density allowed in the Urban-Mixed Use
District,Residential Fringe Subdistrict and the Agricultural/Rural-Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District,Receiving Lands,612 TDR Credits shall be severed from qualifying Sending Lands,of
which a minimum of 311 TDR Credits shall be severed from Sending Lands within one mile of
the Urban Area,
C. Collier County and the Developer of the Naples Reserve RPUD have cooperated to address
affordable housing impacts associated with the Naples Reserve RPUD. The following financial
contribution shall be paid by the developer, or its successors and assigns, to the Collier County
Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
One thousand dollars (51,000)per residential dwelling unit constructed within the project shall
be paid to Collier County within 7 days of the closing on each residential dwelling unit. The
amount set forth herein shall be reduced by any amounts paid by the developer on behalf of
Habitat for Humanity's pursuant to the Developer Contribution Agreement US 41 Developers
Consortium (DCA) to fund the shortfall after Habitat for Humanity's road impact fees are
applied pursuant to the DCA.
The payment of the sums set forth in this Section shall reflect a credit to the project's obligations
to pay any fees that may be adopted in the future by the County relating to the provision of
affordable or workforce housing.
WATER MANAGEMENT
•
A. Constructed drainage facilities and structures shall be located outside the boundaries of
conservation easements/preserves.
B. The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to fully contain the 100-year/72-
hour design storm event with a regulated discharge rate not to exceed 0.10 cfs/acre and no
increase in total volume of discharge.
C. All elevations shall be based on the North American Vertical Datum(NAVD).
PARKS AND RECREATION
The County and the developer will use their best efforts to determine with the US Army Corps of
Engineers the correct acreage for mitigation set forth in Permit Number 199900619(IP-SB) so as to be
able to remove the approximate 20 acres not needed for the mitigation area from this permit. The
referenced Corps permit will not be modified to exclude the surplus off-site mitigation acreage. This
area shall be conveyed to Collier County in fcc simple for a County park. This conveyance shall be made
to the County upon satisfactory resolution of the Corps off-site mitigation acreage issue.
F-3
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct
copy of :
ORDINANCE 2007-71
Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on the 13th day of November, 2007, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 19th
day of November, 2007 .
DWIGHT E. BROCK
Clerk of Courts and Clerk
Ex-officio to Board of
County Commissioners
4p.Z1-4341W,,O .C- -
By: Ann Jennejohn,
Deputy Clerk
COLLIER COUNTY
Growth Management Division
Engineering Services
October 08, 2013
RWA Consulting, Inc.
Chris Wright
6610 Willow Park Dr Suite 200
Naples, FL 34109
Re: Commercial
Excavation Permit No. 60.100, PL20120002540
"NAPLES RESERVE PHASE 1"
Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East
Collier County, Florida
Dear Mr. Wright:
THIS IS YOUR PERMIT AND MUST BE POSTED ON SITE
In accordance with the authority given in County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E., Article IV, Sections
22-106-22-119, as amended, your application for a "(Commercial, Development, Private)" Excavation is
hereby approved subject to the following stipulations:
1. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -7.3 ft. NGVD. All disturbed areas
proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of-4.3 ft. NGVD.
2. Off-site removal of material shall be limited to 420,000 C.Y. and shall be subject to "Standard
Conditions" imposed by the Transportation Services Division in document dated 5/24/1988 (copy
attached).
3. The lake littoral zone shall be created and planted as indicated on the Plan of Record and in
accordance with County Ordinance 91-102 Section 3.05-10 as amended.
4. All provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E. shall be adhered to.
5. Where groundwater is proposed to be pumped during the excavating operation, A Dewatering
Permit shall be obtained from the South Florida Water Management District, and a copy provided to
Engineering Review Services for approval prior to the commencement of any dewatering activity on
the site.
6. No blasting will be permitted unless issued a separate permit by Collier County Engineering
Services Department.
7. If trees are to be removed as a result of the excavating operation, a Vegetation Removal Permit,
required by Land Development Code, Division 3.05 as amended shall be obtained from Collier
County Environmental Services Department before work shall commence.
8. A 20 ft. maintenance easement shall be provided around the perimeter of the lake and a 20 ft.
access easement to it shall be provided from a right-of-way. The easement shall be accessible to
all maintenance vehicles.
Attachment D
9. Stockpile side slope shall be at a maximum of 4:1 unless fencing is installed around the entire
perimeter of the stockpile area.
10. Any stockpile in place for a period exceeding 60 days shall be seeded and mulched and erosion
control devices installed.
11. Please see attached Executive Summary approved by the Board of County Commissioners for
further stipulations.
Since we are in receipt of the excavation performance guarantee in the amount of$1,000,000.00 and the
permit/review fee in the amount of $17,960.00, this letter is your authorization to proceed with the
excavation project in accordance with your plans and the above-mentioned stipulations.
This permit is valid for(1)year and must be renewed on the anniversary date of permit issuance.
The Plan of Record for this excavation is titled "NAPLES RESERVE PHASE ONE" Sheets 27-29
prepared by RWA Consulting, Inc., signed and sealed Christopher O. Wright.
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at(239)-252-
5757.
Sincerely,
Craig Callis
Engineering and Environmental Services Department
cc: EX 60.100, PL20120002540 File
COLLIER COUNTY
Growth Management Division
Engineering Services
January 16, 2014
Robau &Associates, LLC
3050 Horseshoe Drive North
Naples, FL 34104
Re: Commercial
Excavation Permit No. 60.100-1, PL20130002717
"NAPLES RESERVE PHASE 1"
Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East
Collier County, Florida
Dear Mr. Robau:
THIS IS YOUR PERMIT AND MUST BE POSTED ON SITE
In accordance with the authority given in County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E., Article IV, Sections
22-106--22-119, as amended, your application for a "(Commercial, Development, Private)" Excavation is
hereby approved subject to the following stipulations:
1. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -15.3 ft. NAVD. All disturbed areas
proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of-2.7 ft. NAVD.
2. Off-site removal of material shall be limited to amounts identified in Ordinance 12-29 Naples
Reserve Golf Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) - Exhibit F under the Transportation
Commitment D.
3. The lake littoral zone shall be created and planted as indicated on the Plan of Record and in
accordance with County Ordinance 91-102 Section 3.05-10 as amended.
4. All provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 04-55, Section 2.E. shall be adhered to.
5. Where groundwater is proposed to be pumped during the excavating operation, A Dewatering
Permit shall be obtained from the South Florida Water Management District, and a copy provided to
Engineering Review Services for approval prior to the commencement of any dewatering activity on
the site.
6. No blasting will be permitted unless issued a separate permit by Collier County Engineering
Services Department.
7. If trees are to be removed as a result of the excavating operation, a Vegetation Removal Permit,
required by Land Development Code, Division 3.05 as amended shall be obtained from Collier
County Environmental Services Department before work shall commence.
8. A 20 ft. maintenance easement shall be provided around the perimeter of the lake and a 20 ft.
access easement to it shall be provided from a right-of-way. The easement shall be accessible to
all maintenance vehicles.
9. Stockpile side slope shall be at a maximum of 4:1 unless fencing is installed around the entire
perimeter of the stockpile area.
10. Any stockpile in place for a period exceeding 60 days shall be seeded and mulched and erosion
control devices installed.
11. Please see attached Executive Summary approved by the Board of County Commissioners for
further stipulations.
Since we are in receipt of the excavation performance bond #CMS0270828 in the amount of
$1,000,000.00 and the permit/review fee in the amount of $6,843.60, this letter is your authorization to
proceed with the excavation project in accordance with your plans and the above-mentioned stipulations.
This permit is valid for(1)year and must be renewed on the anniversary date of permit issuance.
The Plan of Record for this excavation is titled "NAPLES RESERVE PHASE ONE" Sheet 29 prepared by
RWA Consulting, Inc., signed and sealed Barry Jones.
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at(239)-252-
8279.
Sincerely,
Matthew McLean P.E.
Principal Project Manager
Engineering and Environmental Services Department
cc: EX 60.100-1, PL20130002717 File
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the offsite removal of excess fill from the Naples Reserve RPUD
pursuant to Ordinance 12-29, Exhibit F, Transportation paragraph "D" and consistent with the
Commercial Excavation permit PL 20120002540.
OBJECTIVE: To approve the removal of excess fill from Naples Reserve RPUD to be utilized
in the widening of US 41 between Collier Boulevard and CR 92.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Naples Reserve RPUD (FKA Naples Reserve Golf Club approved
November 13th 2007) would be eligible for the current standard provision allowing for removal
of 20,000 cy of excess fill from the site under the Development Excavation permit. The Naples
Reserve RPUD was amended through Ordinance 12-29 on July 24th 2012. The approval
contemplated the commercial removal of excess fill material from the site expressly for the
anticipated road widening project (US 41 between Collier Boulevard and CR 92). Specifically,
Paragraph"D"of the Transportation section of developer commitments stated the following;
"Excavated material in an amount up to ten percent (to a maximum of 20,000 cubic
yards) of the total volume excavated may be removed from the development with no
prohibition as to the destination of the material. Excavated material in excess of up to
ten percent(to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards) of the total volume excavated, may
be removed from the development and be transported off-site only for use in the US-41
roadway widening project from the intersection of US 41 and Collier Boulevard to the
intersection of US 41 and CR 92, and subject to the excavation provisions from the
Code of Ordinances as may be amended, however the following paragraph will
continue to apply:
Issuance of commercial excavation permits. Applications for commercial excavation
permits shall be reviewed by the community development and environmental services
administrator, or his designee, and by the environmental advisory council for
recommendation and approved by the board. When a request is made to remove
surplus fill material from a previously approved development excavation, the
requirement for review by the environmental advisory council shall be waved, but
dependent on haul route and amount of fill to be hauled, staff may require approval by
Collier County Planning Commission."
The developer estimates that the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) may require up
to 400,000 cubic yards of excavated material depending on the final design of the US 41 road
corridor. The amount of fill needed over a 24-36 month constructions schedule, for the FDOT
project, will vary as each construction phase progresses. The developer anticipates that at peak
demand,FDOT will request approximately 125 deliveries per day.
Recognizing that Greenway Road is only approximately 20 feet wide today, the developer has
committed to widen the road to 24 feet prior to commencing fill delivery to FDOT. Upon
completion of the fill delivery, the developer has also committed to overlaying Greenway Road
with 1.5 inches of asphaltic pavement. These commitments will provide for the safe delivery of
material during the construction phase and leave Greenway Road in a better condition than it was
prior to construction.
The delivery of fill from an adjacent source will also substantially reduce the truck traffic and the
associated wear and tear to the existing county roadway network. In addition,the county will be
in the process of reconstructing the US 41 and US/CR 951 intersection concurrently with the
FDOT US 41 project. Eliminating fill delivery to the US 41 project from existing sources north
of the intersection, will dramatically reduce truck traffic at that intersection during the county's
construction phase.
FISCAL IMPACT:, The FDOT will independently negotiate the fill price with the developer. It
is anticipated that the local delivery of fill from a source adjacent to the project will substantially
reduce the fill price for the FDOT project. The County will benefit by avoiding the wear and tear
on its facilities along with the associated maintenance costs.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality, and
requires a majority vote for Board approval.—ERP
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the BCC approve the offsite removal of fill
from the Naples Reserve RPUD pursuant to the language in Ordinance 12-29 and the
requirements of Commercial Excavation permit PL 20120002540 subject to the following
conditions:
1. The fill material can only be delivered to US 41 in-between Collier Boulevard and
CR 92.
2. Greenway Road will be improved, maintained and ultimately overlaid as shown
on the Greenway Road improvement exhibit attached.
Prepared By: Jack McKenna P.E., County Engineer, Engineering Services Department Growth
Management Division
Attachments: 1)Location Map,2)Greenway Road Improvements
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: <item_outline>
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the offsite removal of excess fill from the
Naples Reserve RPUD pursuant to Ordinance 12-29, Exhibit F,Transportation paragraph "D"
and consistent with the Commercial Excavation permit PL 20120002540.
Meeting Date: 6/11/2013
Prepared By
Name:HouldsworthJohn
Title: Site Plans Reviewer,Senior,Engineering&Environm
5/29/2013 8:55:15 AM
Approved By
Name:McKennaJack
Title:Manager-Engineering Review Services,Engineering&Environmental Services
Date:5/29/2013 12:13:10 PM
Name:PuigJudy
Title:Operations Analyst,GMD P&R
Date:5/29/2013 12:23:43 PM
Name:PepinEmily
Title:Assistant County Attorney,CAO Litigation
Date: 5/29/2013 4:18:03 PM
Name:MarcellaJeanne
Title:Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning
Date:6/3/2013 1:33:27 PM
Name:PepinEmily
Title:Assistant County Attorney,CAO Litigation
Date:6/3/2013 2:34:53 PM
Name:KlatzkowJeff
Title:County Attorney
Date:6/3/2013 2:57:50 PM
Name:FinnEd
Title: Senior Budget Analyst,OMB
Date:6/4/2013 9:19:19 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title:County Manager
Date:6/4/2013 9:57:45 AM
i
Li o
[ m
Want
..o m
II
14 91TE
l = m
LOCATION
4 _ �- >,r
>s :
PROJECT .
A .
�` LOCATION
,_-V v,`' : ... ., wrac crce.n - _ w.n,11 IpRIM.9.!4A4R
t,t1Pri,- --AD4r.,711---Elleffili
,..••••..... •...............„......•••„..........,.....•.„.......,..,........,_...„......„„„........,.,.,........„......,„..„.....,....................
.........._.,_,,....v.„....._,...................,.......„..........,_..„...,...•,....,.....„............„..........„....„..,......._.....„..„.„..
...............,..".,......„......................_•........„,....„........,......,,,................................,.....,..........„,......,,,....,..„.....,...,,
.......,....................,.....,......................„.,...,................•,..........,.......,................................,.......,.......,...,
•........,......,..,........,.............. .,..........,.......,... ....... _ . .
....,......,....,.....,......,,......,.......... ..„.......,.......„..,...,„.............,......,......„..„.„...,„........_„„,.........„..,.......,
"."..„.......,...,:.,.....„..........„..,......„..„... . _ ,. . . .__ ... .....„... ............
..,...•,....,..............................„..............,......,.,....,..............,.........................„,....„...,.„.,.........,............,..„ .
...•...,...,,,........,.........„..........„...,..............................•._•••,..„,.......,....„:„....._.•.„.......,......,___.,_...,...
----"-----,.„,-._•=y,.....,„.,„,,:...y.„„„..,..,...„:......„,...........,„.,.........,.,....,„.._..._...,.._.... ,. ,
•..•••••• ....••••••••••••"."...,.....•„•••.....„...•••_..•....„...........„.„.....„............
........,............,......_..........................,...............,.........„,...,.....
,..
........ . ,
.,
______ ....
..,....,..,....,............,........,..............„..........,,,,,,,,..„...
...,.. .•.. .... .. ..
.,m.ael w . . `ommnrnr' I I ..„,
PM
‘1111
/1111111/ r
1 16
�'°°L. \ _ �_ caw _-
_ m o0
, Iii
1
_ ,. .c �',111�.� II►� ���/111111
q� ��11,10, 1111.11 a...."1...
I 'Y �IIIIII� ........an I \ '' �4� 4 i� ,- i••�0 iiiiiiiii iiiiii°u
LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP
NAPLES RESERVE, PHASE 1
CT)
O
><
O
w w
¢coo <o O O
R. H-
XO x
o z Z O.
Z Z
d0 0_V) 0_V) • = m
1 ¢w 4 aw 1 ¢w J O ,D
yy .....-/ < V)
U
3 z I W !- o
-A A w o o a o 0 Q
two > W U M
°Q owl- ° a� z W
°a 0 wow ° � 0w WO
po z > ww z '1 Viop W 0 =
44 T a n�a� ? wvzi� U — � �
r°� > p . b > b Z W Q
ro O Lo
' -fl I- w IT- .-
w cn w ■ Q O LI w 0 C / 1 Q •
Q +Iw O N -Hw oix _VJ +Iw a o � p (!JZ N
w ow c pw > O LLQ ow 0 < OAF JW dQ°
� a O � a aw Our � o_ TQ 3 Op Q � O
c0 U g ^ 0 W w
0 Z °¢ z ~ Q v°iEL� D Z
III N_ - :—IH o � -�- IQNo w
a � >- Ore ag
-i w i� w i 1� w v=i � p +I w II �� Z re OC Z 0 ~ W W
z 0 z 1 r0 z I I> o >' - -0 �N
w ow Q w o > I 04 1-• w a > I .- oc� Q -I o `_ N
0 0_ 0 Q I I Z O cc 0 � 0_ Z = N II 5 ? o n
>2 4_ x
N 0 N
Z (5
W
O Q W Z O w
O (� O 0 0 O
ri 2 M V7 W o^ In p ro
w p cL F ° J Q H _1 p 0 .7 Z
W
z O
Hpix g ad
CY -4 a > w w '� w w_ E
y .omm
e
--t\I 1.\\I :t\I Z
"14 °Z0.LL
QQ ap Qa a►
0 00 °0
az az az 084
w w w
6MP'60XS01igd10 o\34x3\6ufuuold ays 1000\I asoyd anfasad saldoN 0'1.1-c o*0\6002\:X !w GO:01 EWE '6Z 6oyt
NIM Summary
Naples Reserve RPUD—PUDA
(PL-20140000342)
April 9,2014
South County Regional Library
Attendees: Robert Mulhere, Paula McMichael, Rich Yovanovich, Emilio Robau, Nancy
Gundlach,Don Mears, Jim Moyle
Six Members of the public attended.
[RJM intro regarding NIM process, overview of project, existing approvals to export fill for US
41 improvements, changing from golf course community to lake community has resulted in
excess fill, briefly identified projects anticipated to take additional fill].
Questions asked by attendees:
Why aren't you using Greenway Road now? Trucks are using Naples Reserve Road before
7 in the morning.
What you're probably seeing is construction trucks entering the site,hauling aggregate for laying
pipes onsite. No trucks hauling material from the site are using Naples Reserve Road. Initial
construction has had to use Naples Reserve. Owner has a ROW permit to make improvements to
Greenway Road to be able to use for trucks in the future. All hauling will be done using
Greenway Road.
None of the trucks should use Naples Reserve Road. Reflection Lakes owns and maintains
it.
No, we pay for the road, lighting, irrigation, and maintenance. We paved it. When we are
finished, we will also improve the road and landscaping. We maintain Naples Reserve Road and
will in perpetuity as part of the HOA for the development. This is the entrance road for the
project,our front yard, and we want it to look nice.
Is the triangle piece [on the west side of Naples Reserve Road at the intersection with US
41] a preserve?
Yes, DEP owns the property and it is a mitigation parcel that will be preserved in perpetuity. It
will not be developed. It is very difficult to undo conservation easements.
Page 1
G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Gundlach\PUD Amendments\Naples Reserve Golf Club(2014 petition) PL2014-
0342\NIM Summary 4-1r -- -
Attachment E
Will the Naples Reserve/US 41 intersection have a stoplight after the road widening project
is complete?
It is designed as a 6-lane intersection with a stoplight, but the signal won't be put up
immediately. You will have to meet traffic warrants before the County will install the signal.
There will be a signal at Greenway Road.
How long will it be before the warrants are met and a stoplight goes in? Will the combined
units of Reflection Lakes and Naples Reserve meet the warrant?
It depends on the overall traffic on US 41. It may take time – several months or a couple of
years. There is no way to say for sure.
[EJR offered to provide a copy of the US 41 bid plans to resident of Reflection Lakes for their
reference.]
The lighting for the flagpole in Reflection Lakes has been out for a while. When will it be
back?
August.
You stated that the additional fill to be removed is linked to golf fairways being converted
into lakes.But wasn't the golf use removed a while ago?
No, that was only approved in 2012.
The water level in the ponds in Reflection Lakes seems to be lower. They also seem to have
gone down since blasting began at Naples Reserve. Will digging so many lakes at Naples
Reserve affect the water level in our lakes?
No, they won't affect the levels in your lakes. Lake elevation goes down in the dry season, and
Reflection Lakes may also be seeing some dewatering from the development's proximity to the
US 41 canal. Digging lakes removes sand, not groundwater. Naples Reserve does not have
canals or anything that will dewater the site. Outfall from the project goes to the preserve area
and wetlands at the southwest corner of the site. The site also has monitoring wells to make sure
the site is not being dewatered. Allocations for water consumption—i.e. taking water out of the
aquifer—are also being reduced. Water consumption(irrigation) for a residential development is
less than for a golf course community, and less than for agriculture, so water consumption and
water use is going down.
Page 2
G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Gundlach\PUD Amendments\Naples Reserve Golf Club(2014 petition) PL2014-
0342\NIM Summary 4-10-2014.docx
How deep will the lakes be?
Depths range from 12' to 20' depending on the quality of the material being excavated.
Will the lakes be lined?
No. Lakes in Florida are typically not lined. It is expensive and not necessary.
Will the redesign of US 41 include the canal? Or is it going away?
Yes,the redesign maintains a canal and expands it slightly.
Why is the water level in the lake in the trailer park adjacent to Reflection Lakes higher?
The elevation of that site is lower, probably by 3 or 4 feet. Reflection Lakes was built to flood
regulations and buildings are elevated. The trailer park is not.
Is Naples Reserve in a flood zone?
Yes,the same as Reflection Lakes.
When will the excavation of the additional cubic yards of fill begin? How long will it take?
First improvements to Greenway Road will be made, which will probably take 2 or 3 months.
We hope to be hauling to the US 41 project in August. It will last probably a year or two. The
roadway project is projected to end in 2016.
How much does each truck carry?
Rule of thumb is 15 cubic yards/truck.
Who lives on Greenway? Why is nobody here from that road?
It is more rural, nurseries and agriculture. There is a Habitat for Humanity development off of
Greenway. We have been in contact with them in case there would be a conflict with school
buses, but the buses pick up inside the development, not on Greenway. We haven't had any
issues using Greenway,but if issues arise, we will address them.
Page 3
G:\CDESPlanning Services\Current\Gundlach\PUDAmendments\Naples Reserve Golf Club (2014 petition) PL2014-
0342\NIM Summary 4-10-2014.docx
Does the development have a secondary access?
Yes, this is required by code. It will be onto Greenway. Both accesses will be gated but not
guarded.
Will there be an access road for us to take to Greenway?
No,not that Naples Reserve is constructing.
Page 4
G:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Gundlach\PUD Amendments\Naples Reserve Golf Club(2014 petition) PL2014-
0342\NIM Summary 4-10-2014.docx
COLLIER COUNTY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
AMENDMENTS
2013 Batch/In-House GMP MENDMENTS
(TRANSMITTAL HEARING)
[Petitions: Project PL20130001109/CPSP-2013-6]
CCPC: MAY 15., 2014
BCC: JULY 08, 2014
Clerk of Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2013 (EAR-Based) Batch #1 In-House GMP Amendments
Transmittal Hearing
Project PL20130001109/Petition CPSP-2013-6
CCPC May 15, 2014 AGENDA
1) TAB: Table of Contents DOCUMENT: Table of Contents
2) TAB: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report:
PL20130001109/CPSP-2013-6
3) TAB: Transmittal Resolution DOCUMENTS: Transmittal Resolution with Exhibit
"A" Text or Maps:
PL20130001109/CPSP-2013-6
4) TAB: Legal Advertisements DOCUMENT: CCPC Advertisement
Amendments(s) include the following GMP Elements:
1) Capital Improvement Element
2) Transportation Element
3) Storm Water Sub Element of the Public Facilities Element
4) Recreation & Open Space Element
5) Conservation & Coastal Management Element
6) Future Land Use Element
Agenda Item 9H
Co e-r CeOT4.Hty
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULATION, LAND
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION
HEARING DATE: MAY 15, 2014
RE: PETITION NO. PL20130001109/CPSP-2013-6, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE
MAP SERIES, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, AND THE
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
[TRANSMITTAL HEARING]
REQUESTED ACTION and STAFF ANALYSIS:
This proposal consists of several individual staff-initiated amendments, as authorized or directed by
the Board of County Commissioners. Most of the amendments seek to add clarity, correct text and
map errors or omissions, and provide harmony and internal consistency. Each amendment is
identified below, followed by brief explanation/analysis. The proposed amendments themselves make
up the Exhibit "A" accompanying the Transmittal Resolution.
Conservation &Coastal Management Element(CCME):
• Revise Statutory cites in INTRODUCTION, as amended earlier by Evaluation and Appraisal
Report (EAR)-based Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendments elsewhere.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction —the Objective 2.1 placeholder, "or its successor"
appears in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMPAs, then awaiting adoption of
specific document.
• Deleting possessive modifier in Goal 6, for proper language of a GMP Goal.
• Change year from "2012" to "2013" in Policy 6.1.1.
• Remove the term "District" in this context in Policy 6.2.3.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction—updating the reference to a State of Florida
document to replace the Policy 6.5.2 placeholder text that was then awaiting adoption of
specific document.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction—revise Goal 8 and Objective 8.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMPAs.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction—revise Objective 9.3 and Policy 9.3.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMPAs.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction—revise Goal 11 and Objective 11.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMPAs.
• Revise department names in Policy 12.1.6.
— 1 —
Agenda Item 9H
• Renumber policy with the number"12.1.16"to"12.1.15".
• Revise department name in Policy 12.2.5.
• Revise department/director name in Policy 12.3.3.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction—revise Objective 12.4 for proper language of a
GMP Objective, and revise department name in Objective 12.4 and Policy 12.4.1.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction—revise Goal 13 and Objective 13.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMPAs.
Capital Improvement Element(CIE):
• Revise Statutory cite in INTRODUCTION, as amended earlier by EAR-based GMPAs
elsewhere.
• Make singular the "Goals" in heading II.
• Revise to include introductory statement in Policy 1.5.H, which did not get moved with other
EAR-based amendments.
• Update references to School District documents in "Public School Facilities Projects" section of
the Schedule of Capital Improvements.
• Delete entry no. 4, under Section V, referring to a Semi-annual Report that is no longer
required. Re-number subsequent entries 5-7 to account for this deletion.
• Update language in present entry 7 under Section V referencing Evaluation and Appraisal
Reports; delete 7.B. to correlate with earlier deletion pertaining to a Semi-annual Report that is
no longer required, and re-letter present 7.C; and, add new 7.0 to reflect statutory changes in
2011.
• Revise throughout to correctly use the "US 41"highway designation that officially, has no
periods, as with "U.S. 41" and no hyphenation, as with "US-41". Change all US 41 entries —
and other US highways—to be consistent.
Future Land Use Element(FLUE):
• Update reference to Florida Planning law in the UNDERLYING CONCEPTS, "Coordination of
Land Use and Public Facilities" section.
• De-capitalize a common noun in Policy 2.2.
• Replace the informal "#"with the formal "No." for internal consistency in Policy 4.6 and
throughout. Note: the strike through of the number symbol-#- may not be apparent.
• Revise second paragraph under the "Urban Mixed Use District" section to delete a portion of
one sentence for clarity—many years ago an amendment was adopted in which words were
missing resulting in a nonsensical sentence; and, to revise another sentence for proper
sentence structure.
• Revise to remove the seldom found ":" (colon)for internal consistency from "Urban Residential
Subdistrict:" and other applicable subdistrict headings where found.
• Remove a repeated phrase Sending Lands subsection 9.d.
• Revise to remove the seldom found "*" (asterisk)for internal consistency from North Belle
Meade Overlay, In General, Planning Considerations' subsections and other applicable
provisions where found. Note: the strike through of an asterisk-*- may actually appear to be
an underline.
• Revise the acronym-only heading for internal consistency from the "NRPA" subsection.
• Revise Statutory cite in RLSA Policies1.2, 4.2 and 4.7, as amended earlier in RLSA Policies
1.16 and 4.6 by EAR-based GMPAs and other applicable provisions where found.
• Revise throughout to correctly use the "US 41"highway designation that officially, has no
periods, as with "U.S. 41" and no hyphenation, as with "US-41". Change all US 41 entries —
and other US highways—to be consistent.
—2—
Agenda Item 9H
Future Land Use Map Series (FLUM):
• Add new Gordon River Greenway Conservation designation inset map and add inset map title
to FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES listing.
Recreation and Open Space Element(ROSE):
• Revise to number headings; delete element name sub-heading.
• Amend Policy 1.1.1 to replace Policy"1.5; subsection "G""with Policy "1.5.G"for internal
consistency.
• Delete paragraph "C" under Policy 1.1.1. Paragraphs "A" and "B" in Policy 1.1.1 were correctly
deleted from the ROSE by Ordinance 13-11 (EAR-based amendment) and the content of
Paragraphs A and B were correctly added to the CIE by Ordinance 13-03 (EAR-based
amendment). The content of Paragraph "C"was deleted from the CIE prior to 2008, but the
glitch occurred when the duplicative Paragraph C in the ROSE was not.
• Revise Goal 2 to be consistent with EAR-based re-formatting of goals, objectives and policies,
throughout.
Stormwater Management Sub-Element:
• Revise to match earlier Sub-Element renaming as amended elsewhere in the
INTRODUCTION for internal consistency, and to use upper case more similar to prevailing
style found where a specific"Element" or"Sub-Element" is being referenced—making these
proper nouns—and other applicable provisions where found.
• Revise to number headings; Make singular the "Goals" in heading II.
• Amend Policy 2.1 to replace Policy"1.5; subsection "C""with Policy "1.5.C" for internal
consistency.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction— updating the reference to a State of Florida
document to replace the Policy 6.2 placeholder text that was then awaiting adoption of specific
document. Repeated in Policy 6.3 item 2.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction—completing the incomplete list of basins and their
respective discharge rates in Policy 6.3.
Transportation Element(TE):
• Revise to de-pluralize the word "resembles" in the FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS, "Traffic
Circulation Constraints" section.
• Amend Policy 1.3 to replace Policy "1.5; subsection "A""with Policy "1.5.A" for internal
consistency.
• Amend Policy 1.4 to replace Policy"1.5; subsection "B"" with Policy "1.5.B" for internal
consistency.
• Re-insert the word "and" between 'Statutes' and 'the' in Policy 5.4, which was unintentionally
deleted by Ord. 13-4 (EAR-based GMPAs).
• Insert parenthetical number entries where only written numbers appear, so as to add clarity in
Policies 5.5 and 5.6.
• Revise Policy 5.6 to correct the reference to "Department" affected by past renaming as part of
an organizational change.
• Insert thoroughfare designation entries to add clarity in Policy 6.5—and other instances where
found.
• Revise Policy 6.5 to add complete road names.
• Revise to correctly use the "US 41"highway designation that officially, has no periods, as with
"U.S. 41" and no hyphenation, as with "US-41". Change all US 41 entries — and other US
highways—to be consistent in Policies 5.4, 5.5, 6.5 and in the List of tables/Maps/Figures (un-
adopted).
—3 —
Agenda Item 9H
ADDITIONAL STAFF ACTION and ANALYSES:
Approval of amendments to the Growth Management Plan Element is intended to confer the Board's
consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. The above
Elements of the GMP have a number of these in common, in particular: to update and make current
the Tables of Contents, along with corresponding titles, headings and other entries — inside and
between Elements—to maximize internal consistency.
Environmental Impacts:
The above amendments are primarily text and/or map corrections and clarifications, with no
amendments resulting in a new change to the future land use designation. Accordingly, these
amendments do not intensify the allowable uses or densities, and there are no new environmental
impacts being authorized by any of these amendments.
Public Facilities Impacts:
Due to the nature of most of these amendments, there are no new impacts upon public facilities being
authorized.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This staff report has been approved as to form and legality by the Office of the County Attorney.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSP-2013-6 to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
—4—
Agenda Item 9.
PREPARED BY:
CCV • • DATE: up AliL14-
CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRI C PAL PLANNER
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
REVIEWED BY:
F
l. , Y -...._... DATE: 14l
DAVID WEEKS, AICP, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGER
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
REVIEWED BY:
DATE: `I "its 111
MIKE BOSI,AICP, DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
L4 -17 -/V
NICK CA6A GUS A,AD OR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
PETITION NOs. PL20130001109/CPSP-2013-6
Staff Report for the May 15, 2014, CCPC Meeting.
NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the July 8, 2014, BCC Meeting.
G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2013 GMPAs Outside of Cycle\CPSP-2013-6 First Set of Batch
Amendments\13-6 Transmittal Stff Rprt_4-16 final.docx
-5 -
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
PROPOSING 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, TO FIX
GLITCHES RELATED TO CHANGES IN THE 2011 EAR-BASED
AMENDMENTS AND TO REVISE FORMAT, STRUCTURE AND
LANGUAGE FOR INTERNAL CONSISTENCY SPECIFICALLY
AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT;
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; CONSERVATION AND COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
ELEMENT; THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE
LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; THE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT (DRAINAGE) SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC
FACILITIES ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING
TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.
[PL20130001109/CPSP-2013-6[
WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et seq., Florida Statutes, the
Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was
n required to prepare and adapt a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier
County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989;and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (2010), Collier
County adopted its Evaluation and Appraisal Report ("EAR") of the Growth Management Plan
on January 31. 2011 by Resolution No.2011-24;and
WHEREAS, the EAR identified provisions of the Growth Management Plan that need to
be amended; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared EAR-based plan amendments to address
glitches related to 2011 EAR-based amendments to the following elements of its Growth
Management Plan:
Capital Improvement Element;
Transportation Element;
Conservation and Coastal Management Element;
Recreation and Open Space Element;
Future Land Use Element;
Stormwater Management(Drainage)Sub-Element;
EAR-based C M'PA Page 1 of 3
Rev.4116/14
Words underlined are additions;Wordsk-t#ret are deletions
and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2014, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the
proposed EAR-based amendments to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority
granted to it by Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, and recommended approval of said
amendments to the Board of County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing
approved the transmittal of the proposed EAR-based amendments to the Growth Management
Plan to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes;and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed EAR-based Growth Management
Plan Amendments, the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) has sixty (60) days to
review the proposed EAR-based amendments and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier
County, its comments along with any objections and any recommendations for modification,
within said sixty(60)days pursuant to Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes;and
WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO, must
adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments
within one-hundred-eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184(4), Florida
Statutes; and
WHEREAS, after the DEO makes a determination of completeness of the adopted EAR-
based Growth Management Plan Amendments, the DEO has forty-five (45) days to review and
determine if the Plan Amendments are in compliance with the Community Planning Act of 2011,
pursuant to Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,that:
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed EAR-Based Growth
Management Plan Amendments attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference
herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity thereby
initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendments, prior to
final adoption and State determination of compliance with the Community Planning Act of 2011.
THIS RESOLUTION adopted after motion, second and majority vote this day of
2014.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA
BY:
Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING,Chairman
EAR-based GMPA Page 2 of 3
Rev.4116/14
Words underlined are additions; Words 5t-r-tiek-thfetigh are deletions
Approved as to form and legality:
Of'
Heidi Ashton-Cicko 40)
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit A—Text and Maps
14-CMP-00913/14
EAR-based GMPA Page 3 of 3
Rev,4/16/14
Words underlined are additions;Words stfeekrthfettgh are deletions
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
EXHIBIT "A"
PL201300011091CPSP-2013-6
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (CCME)
I, INTRODUCTION [Revised text, page 1]
Subsection 163.3177 ( (6)(d), Florida Statutes requires all local governments within the State of
Florida to have, as part of their respective Local Government Comprehensive Plans, an Element,
dealing with "the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air,
water, water recharge areas, wetlands, water wells, estuarine marshes, soils, beaches, shores, flood
plains, rivers, bays, lakes, harbors, forests, fisheries and wildlife, marine habitat, minerals, and other
natural and environmental resources, including factors that affect energy conservation."
- - - -- .--:- - - This Subsection 163.3177 (6)(d), F.S., which also
requires local Conservation Elements to consider the applicable Water Management District water
supply plans or water management plans. More specifically, the Conservation Element must"assess
their';current, as well a&and projected, water needs and sources for at least a 10-year period."
In addition to the Conservation Element, Subsection 163.3177 (5Xg) (6)(q), Florida Statutes, also
requires certain designated local governments (including Collier County) to have an element of the
local comprehensive plan dealing with coastal management. This Coastal Management Element
must "set forth the policies that shall guide the local government's decisions and program
implementation with respect to the following objectives:"
** ** ** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
OBJECTIVE 2.1: [Revised text, page 6]
Prepare Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the
County's estuarine and wetland systems. Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, the
County shall apply the following as interim standards for development:
a. All new development and re-development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality
volumetric requirements of the =- '= - - - -- - "- _- -- '-
A:: _ x - - - e - - - -- e.- • State of Florida's
Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I (2013). or its successor, in
effect at the time of project approval, and the retention and detention requirements, and the
allowable off-site discharge rates required by Stormwater Management Sub-Element Policy
6.2 and 6.3, respectively;
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
GOAL 6: [Revised text, page 16]
TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S NATIVE
VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 6.1.1: [Revised text, page 16]
For the County's Urban Designated Area Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area
and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural-Industrial District and Rural-Settlement Area District
as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the
following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strook-through are deleted. 1
Staff Proposed GIMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards
referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this
jaPolicy shall apply to all non-agricultural development except for single-family dwelling units situated
on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified
in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this
Element. For properties not previously within the Coastal High Hazard Area but now within the
Coastal High Hazard Area due to adoption of a revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary in 201-2
2013, the native vegetation preservation and retention standards of the Non-Coastal High Hazard
Area shall continue to apply. (Reference the Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map in the
Future Land Use Element.)
*** *** *** *** text break *.* *** *** *** ***
Policy 6.2.3: [Repositioned parenthetical and revised text, page 27]
Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural functions
of wetlands are protected and conserved... The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands.
break *** *** *** *** ***
(2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Overlay
Best available data indicates that 74% of the County's wetlands are within the Big Cypress Area of
Critical State Concern Overlay. The land development regulations contained in the ACSC Overlay
District, as depicted on the Countywide Future Land Use Map, provide standards that facilitate the
goal of directing higher intensity land uses away from wetland systems. The development standards
for the ACSC Overlay (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section V) specify that site alterations
shall be limited to 10% of the total site The majority of the land contained within the ACSC is also
within the Conservation Designation and thus is subject to the land use limitations of that Land Use
Designation.
(3) Natural Resource Protection Areas(NRPAs)
Major wetland systems and regional flow-ways were used as criteria to establish the NRPA Overlay
District as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and as discussed in FLUE Land Use Designation,
Section V.C. These areas include high functioning wetland systems and, although portions of the
NRPA Overlay include lands within the Conservation Designation, represent approximately 12% of the
County's wetlands, which are not located in Conservation Lands. Based on the relatively high
concentration of wetlands within NRPA designated lands, incompatible land uses shall be directed
away from these areas. Allowable land uses within NRPAs are also subject to native vegetation
retention and preservation standards of 90%.
text break
Policy 6.5.2: [Revised text, page 35]
The following criteria shall apply to development contiguous to natural reservations in order to reduce
negative impacts to the natural reservations:
text break *.. *** *** *** ***
(3) Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, stormwater management systems discharging
directly to the natural reservation shall meet the Outstanding Florida Water criteria of one-half
inch of dry retention or retention pretreatment as specified in Section 5.2.2(b), of the SPALMDts
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. 2
low
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116114
- .:-•..• !� • ;_. •e State of Florida's Environmental Resource Permit
Applicant's Handbook Volume I (2013), or its successor.
(4) Proposed development shall demonstrate that ground water table drawdowns or diversions
will not adversely impact the natural reservation. Detention and control elevations shall be set
to protect the natural reservation and be consistent with surrounding land and project control
elevations and water tables. In order to meet these requirements, projects shall be designed
in accordance with Sections 4.2.2.4, 6.11 and 6.12 of i the State of
Florida's Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I (2013), or its
successor.
* *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
GOAL 8: [Revised text, page 41]
THE COUNTY SHALL TO MAINTAIN COLLIER COUNTY'S EXISTING AIR QUALITY.
OBJECTIVE 8.1: [Revised text, page 41]
-- -_ -- _ _ - sComply with all applicable federal and State air quality standards.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
OBJECTIVE 9.3: [Revised text, page 42]
_ 2 - - w:---•-• eContinue to hold its hazardous waste collection
days at least once per year.
Policy 9.3.1: [Revised text, page 42]
The hHazardous waste collection days shall target residential households but also allow small
businesses to participate to some extent.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
GOAL 11: [Revised text, page 50]
TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION, RESERVATION, AND SENSITIVE
RE-USE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES.
OBJECTIVE 11.1: [Revised text, page 50]
To pProtect historic and archaeological resources in Collier County.
*** *** *** *** *** text break x** *** *** *** ***
Policy 12.1.6: [Revised text, page 52]
The Directors of the Engineering Services Department/Transportation Planning Section and Bureau of
Emergency Services Management Departments will review, at least annually, review evacuation route
road improvement needs to ensure that necessary improvements are reflected within Table A, the
Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as contained within the Capital Improvement Element of
this Growth Management Plan.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 12,1.14: [Revised text, page 53]
All new nursing homes and assisted living facilities that are licensed shall have a core area to shelter
residents and staff on site The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design
Criteria that is are required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words straok eugh are deleted. 3
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
("State Requirements for Educational Facilities," 2007). Additionally, this area shall be capable of
ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up generator for a period of no less than 72 hours.
Policy 12.1.4-6 15: [Revised text, page 54]
The County will coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation on its plans to one-way
evacuation routes on State maintained roads that are primary evacuation routes for vulnerable
populations.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** .**
Policy 12.2.5: [Revised text, page 55]
The County shall consider the Coastal High Hazard Area as a geographical area lying below the
elevation of the Category 1 storm surge line as presently defined in the 2011 Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study, or subsequently authorized storm surge or
evacuation planning studies coordinated by the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services
-- - -• P-■- -• --• and approved by the Board of County Commissioners,
*** *** .** text break .** *** *** *** ***
Policy 12.3.3: [Revised text, page 55]
The Recovery Task Force shall include the Sheriff, the Growth Management Division Administrator,
the - z -• -- - Planning and Zoning Director, the Bureau of Emergency Services
Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners, such as
representatives from municipalities within the County that have received damage from a storm.
*** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
OBJECTIVE 12.4: [Revised text, page 56]
The-Goonty-ohall rnMake every reasonable effort to meet the emergency preparedness requirements
of Persons with Special Needs such as the elderly, handicapped, the infirmed and those requiring
transportation from a threatened area. In the event of a countywide emergency, such as a hurricane
or other large-scale disaster, the County Bureau of Emergency Services Management Department in
coordination with the County Health Department and other officials shall open and operate one or
more refuges for persons listed on the County's Special Needs Registry and their caregivers. Medical
and support equipment at such refuges will include, but not necessarily be limited to, respirators,
oxygen tanks,first aid equipment, disaster cots and blankets, and defibrillators.
Policy 12.4.1: [Revised text, page 56]
All new hospitals, nursing homes, and adult congregate living facilities shall prepare an emergency
preparedness plan for approval by the Bureau of Emergency Services Management Department prior
to receiving a final development order.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
GOAL 13: [Revised text, page 56]
T-14E—COUN-T-Y—SHALL TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGULATORY
PROGRAMS.
OBJECTIVE 13.1: [Revised text, page 57]
To establish, prior to the adoption of any land development regulation to implement this Element,
including but not limited to NRPA management guidelines and watershed management plans, a
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words&tick-through are deleted. 4
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
program to review such regulations and identify existing regulatory programs exercised by regional,
State, or Federal agencies with jurisdiction over the activities sought to be regulated.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
I. INTRODUCTION [Revised parenthetical citation, page 1]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in
the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of
those facilities to meet established acceptable levels of service." The statute defines the phrase"level
of service" as "...an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a facility based an and
related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per
unit of demand for each public facility." (Section ?- -.el- = , - e*".-- - - -22'-
163.3164(28), Florida Statutes).
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised parenthetical citation, page 2]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 1.5: [Revised text, page 7]
The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows:
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
C. County Stormwater Management Systems:
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
LEVELS OF SERVICE ATTAINED BY BASINS
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
BASIN LEVEL OF SERVICE
SOUTHERN COASTAL BASIN
US-41 US 41 Outfall Swale No. 1 Basin D
US-44 US 41 Outfall Swale No. 2 Basin D
Seminole Park Outlet Basin C
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
H. Public School Facilities:
Level of Service (LOS) standards for CSAs shall be based upon permanent FISH capacity:
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-hrough are deleted. 5
Staff Proposed GPM Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
1. Elementary schools = 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment/ FISH Capacity
2. Middle schools = 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment/ FISH Capacity
3. High schools = 100 percent (1.00) of CSA Enrollment/ FISH Capacity
.*. *.* .** *** *** text break *** .** *** *** ***
Collier County Schedule of Capital Improvements [Revised text, page 23]
Public School Facilities Projects
For the purpose of school concurrency, and in accordance with Policy 4.2, the County hereby
incorporates, by reference, the School District's Capital Improvement Plan FY 13 32 14 33,
approved on May 8, 2012 May 14, 2013: and, the District Facilities Work Program FY 13 17 14 —
18, adopted by the School Board on September 12, 2012 September 10. 2013 is hereby incorporated
as data and analysis.
... **. *.* *.. *** text break **. **. *** *** ***
V. PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION [Revised text, page 26]
Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs
have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in this Capital
Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded.
*.. *** **. *** *** text break *** *** *** ... ***
The mandatory -••• _ - -es' -- e ida Department of Community Affairs concerning
•
•
•
5 4. Update of Capital Improvement Element [Renumbered text, page 26]
The monitoring of and adjustment to this Capital Improvement Element is an ongoing process
necessitated by changing conditions. Beginning no later than December of each year, the Element
will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process, and the release of the official BEBR
population estimates and projections. The update will include:
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
•
•
6 5. Concurrency Management System [Renumbered text, page 27]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
•
7 6. Third Evaluation and Appraisal Report Reviews [Renumbered & revised text, page 28]
-- --: .' •: •` _ Evaluation and Appraisal Report Reviews (EAR) will address the implementation
of the goals, objectives and policies of this Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures
necessary to enable the completion of the-third each evaluation include:
A. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System, as set forth in Section 6 5
above;
_ .. t_ ' _ _ -- _ -- - •
DRAFT Words underlined are added,words struck through are deleted. 6
wwwww
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
G B. Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting
documents; and
C. Review of State of Florida legislation concerning comprehensive planning and growth
management passed since the previous EAR to evaluate effects on Collier County planning efforts.
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE)
*** *** ** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
C. UNDERLYING CONCEPTS [Revised text, page 4]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Coordination of Land Use and Public Facilities
At the heart of Florida's Gfewtizi-Mattiagement Community Planning Act (Chapter 163, Florida Statutes)
is the requirement that adequate service by public facilities must be available at the time of demand
by new development. This requirement is achieved by spatial coordination of public facilities with land
uses through the Future Land Use Map, and temporal coordination through LOS standards. The LOS
standards are binding - no final local Development Order may be issued which is not consistent with
the Concurrency Management System. Binding LOS standards have been established for roads,
water supply, sewage treatment, water management, solid waste and parks. While the standards in
the Capital Improvement and Public Facility Elements serve to guide public provision of infrastructure,
within the context of the Future Land Use Element the standards serve to assure the availability of
adequate facilities, whether public or private.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** ** ***
Policy 2.2: [Revised text, page 12]
Deficiencies or potential deficiencies that have been determined through the Annual Update and
Inventory Report on capital public facilities may include the following remedial actions: establish an
area of significant influence for roads, a TCEA, TCMA, add projects to the Capital Improvement
Element, enter into a binding commitment with a Odeveloper to construct the needed facilities or defer
development until improvements can be made or the level of service is amended to ensure available
capacity.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 2.4: [Revised text, page 12]
Pursuant to the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in this Element,
development located within the South ice: US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA)
(See Map TR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to
the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the
Transportation Element.
Developments within the South U& US 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification pursuant to Policy
5.6 of the Transportation Element shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a
concurrency exception is requested, developments shall be subject to a concurrency review for the
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words etruok-through are deleted. 7
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining
accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 4.6: [Revised text, page 16]
Access Management Plan provisions have been developed for Mixed Use and Interchange Activity
Centers designated on the Future Land Use Map and these provisions have been incorporated into
the Collier County Land Development Code. The intent of the Access Management Plan provisions is
defined by the following guidelines and principles:
a. The number of ingress and egress points shall be minimized and shall be combined and
signalized to the maximum extent possible_
b. Spacing of access points shall meet, to the maximum extent possible, the standards set
forth in the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution#No. 01-247, adopted June 26, 2001).
Policy 4.7: [Revised text, page 16]
The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing
commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to
development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such
redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by
•
the Board of County Commissioners. The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was
adopted by the Board on June 13 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle
area formed by US 41 East, Davis Boulevard and Airport-Pulling Road. The Immokalee
Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000. Other specific areas that may be
considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily
limited to:
a. Pine Ridge Road, between 1 -5: US 41 North and Goodlette-Frank Road;
b. 14,S,US 41 North in Naples Park; and,
c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1
Subdivision.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
A. Urban Mixed Use District [Revised text, page 27]
This District, which represents approximately 116,000 acres, is intended to accommodate a variety of
residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit
Developments. Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria,
- - - -- - - .-= -_ e - = Water-dependent
and water-related land uses are permitted within the coastal region of this District. Mixed-use sites of
water-dependent and water-related uses and other recreational uses may include water-related parks,
marinas (public or private), yacht clubs, and related accessory and recreational uses, such as boat
storage, launching facilities, fueling facilities, and restaurants. Any development that includes a
water-dependent and/or water-related land use shall be encouraged to the use of the Planned Unit
Development technique and other innovative approaches so as to conserve environmentally sensitive
areas features and to assure compatibility with surrounding land uses.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
1. Urban Residential Subdistrict: [Revised text, page 28]
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words st u k-t treugh are deleted, 8
...._........
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource
constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict
comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible
residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16
dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the
Land Development Code.
2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict:
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area
and the Agricultural/Rural Area and comprises approximately 5,500 acres and 5% of the Urban Mixed
Use District. Residential land uses may be allowed at a maximum base density of 1.5 units per gross
acre, plus any density bonus that may be achieved via CCME Policy 6.2.5 (6) b.1., and either "a" or
"b" below:
*** *** **• *** *** text break *,t* *** *** *** ***
3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict: [Revised text, page 30]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict: [Revised text, page 33]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
10. Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict [Revised text, page 371
The Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict consists of approximately 83 acres and is located east of
Collier Boulevard (SA, SR 951) and south of 1-1-, US 41 (Tamiami Trail, East). The intent of the
Subdistrict is primarily to provide for a mixture of regional commercial uses and residential
development; the regional commercial uses are intended to serve the South Naples and Royal
Fakapalm Planning Communities, and the Marco Island area. Conversely, the primary intent of the
Subdistrict is not to provide for community and neighborhood commercial uses. The focus of the
residential component of the Subdistrict shall be the provision of affordable-workforce housing to
support the commercial uses within the Subdistrict, as well as in the South Naples and Royal
Fakapalm Planning Communities, and the Marco Island area. The entire Subdistrict shall be
developed under a unified plan; this unified plan must be in the form of a Planned Unit Development.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Specific requirements and limitations for the Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict as follows:
a. Access to the Subdistrict shall be provided from Collier Boulevard (SR 951) and 1.1,87.US 41. A
loop road that is open to the public shall connect these access points.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
1 . Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict [Revised text, page 43]
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide primarily for neighborhood commercial development at a
scale not typically found in the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict.
.** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
a. Parcel 1
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stcus ough are deleted. 9
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
This parcel is located at the intersection of Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. A maximum
of 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial uses may be allowed. Allowable
uses shall be the following, except as prohibited above: retail, personal service, restaurant, office, and
all other uses as allowed, whether by right or by conditional use, in the C-1 through C-3 zoning
districts as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as
amended, in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict (Ordinance No. 2005-25 adopted on
June 7, 2005); other comparable and/or compatible land uses not found specifically in the C-1 through
C-3 zoning districts, limited to: general and medical offices, government offices, financial institutions,
personal and business services, limited indoor recreational uses, and limited retail uses; mixed-use
development (residential and commercial uses). The maximum floor area for any single commercial
user shall be 20,000 square feet, except for a grocery/supermarket, physical fitness facility,
craft/hobby store, home furniture/furnishing store, or department store use, which shall not exceed a
maximum of 50,000 square feet,
b. Parcel 2
This parcel is located approximately 1/4 mile east of Livingston Road and is adjacent to multifamily
residential uses. A maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial uses
may be allowed. Allowable uses shall be the following, except as prohibited above: General and
medical offices, community facilities, and business and personal services, all as allowed, whether by
right or by conditional use; in the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts as set forth in the Collier County
Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended, in effect as of the date of adoption of
this Subdistrict (Ordinance No. 2005-25 adopted on June 7, 2005). The maximum floor area for any
single commercial user shall be 20,000 square feet.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
2. Density Bonuses [Revised text, page 481
Consistency with the following characteristics may add to the base density. Density bonuses are
discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision
and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development
Code.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
c. Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus;
As used in this density bonus provision, the term "affordable" shall be as defined in Chapter 420.9071,
F.S. To encourage the provision of affordable-workforce housing within certain Districts and
Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to 8 residential units per gross acre may
be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable-workforce
Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance # No.
04-41, as amended, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18 2004), and if the affordable-
workforce housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 150% of the median income
for Collier County. In the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, projects utilizing the Affordable-workforce
Housing Density Bonus must provide appropriate mitigation consistent with Objective 12.1 and
subsequent policies, as applicable, of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Also, for
those specific properties identified within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, this density bonus
is allowed but only to a maximum of 6 residential units per gross acre. Additionally, the Affordable-
workforce Housing Density Bonus may be utilized within the Agricultural/Rural designation, as
provided for in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, subject to the aforementioned Section
2.06.00 of the Land Development Code.
�-. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strusk-th{eagh are deleted. 10
•
•
•
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
•
[Revised text, page 50
4. Density Conditions: [ p 9 50]
The following density condition applies to all properties subject to the Density Rating System.
a. Maximum Density
The maximum allowed density shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per gross acre within the Urban
designated area, except when utilizing the Transfer of Development Rights (TOR) provision contained
in Section 2.03.07 of the Land Development Code adopted by Ordinance # No 04-41, as amended
on June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** ***
1. Rural Commercial Subdistrict [Revised text, page 67]
Within the Agricultural/Rural - Mixed Use District, commercial development.. up to a maximum of 200
acres, may be allowed providing the following standards for intensity of use are met:
a. The project, or that portion of a larger project, that is devoted to commercial development, is 2.5
acres or less in size;
b. The project, or that portion of a larger project which is devoted to commercial development, is no
closer than 5 miles, measured by radial distance, from the nearest developed commercial area,
zoned commercial area or designated Mixed Use Activity Center, except that the southwest
quadrant at the intersection of US 41 and SR,. SR 29, is eligible for commercial zoning under this
provision;
** *«* *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
[Revised text, page 80]
C) Sending Lands: Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental
value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed
species.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
9. Where residential density is transferred from Sending Lands, allowable uses shall be limited to the
following:
a) Agricultural uses consistent with Chapter 823.14(6) Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farm
Act), including water management facilities, to the extent and intensity that such operations
exist at the date of any transfer of development rights.
b) Cattle grazing on unimproved pasture where no clearing is required;
c) Detached single-family dwelling units, including mobile homes where the Mobile Home Zoning
Overlay exists, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 40 acres. In order to retain
these development rights after any transfer, up to one dwelling must be retained (not
transferred) per 40 acres.
d) One detached dwelling unit, including mobile homes where the Mobile Home Zoning Overlay
exists, per each preexisting lot or parcel of less than 40 acres. For the purpose of this
provision, a preexisting lot or parcel is one that was in existence on or before June 22, 1999
and is: 1) a lot or parcel which is - * - -- -- - - part of a subdivision recorded in the
public records of Collier County, Florida; or 2) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed
boundaries, described by metes and bounds or other specific legal description, the description
of which has been recorded in the public records of Collier County Florida on or before June
22, 1999; or 3) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries, for which an agreement for
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strtok-throgh are deleted. 1 1
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
deed was executed prior to June 22, 1999. In order to retain these development rights after
any transfer, up to one dwelling must be retained (not transferred) per each lot or parcel.
*** *** *** text break *.* *** *** *** ***
B. North Belle Meade Overlay [Revised text, page 93]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
1. IN GENERAL
text break
Planning Considerations
a. Wildlife Crossing and Wildlife Corridor
"Y- The County should support construction of a wildlife crossing under 1-75 connecting the NBM
and South Belle Meade (SBM), and the creation of a wildlife corridor connecting the NBM with
the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge to the east.
b. Transportation
• An existing access road (presently providing access to County water wells) along the northern
section lines of Sections 22, 23 and 24 of Range 27 East may be maintained and improved, and
an extension of Wilson Boulevard should be provided through Section 33, Range 27 East
comprising a collector or arterial road extending to the south to Interstate 75 via an interchange
or service road for residential development should it commence in Sections 21, 28 and 27, or in
the alternate a haul road along an extension of Wilson Boulevard to service earth mining
activities with a connection through Sections 32 and 31 to Landfill Road.
▪ Lands required for the extension of Wilson Boulevard will be dedicated to Collier County at the
time of rezoning. The right-of-way shall be a sufficient size to accommodate collector road
requirements should there be a demonstrated need.
t Within one year of June 19, 2002, the alternative alignments for east-west roadway, connecting
County Road 951 to an extension of Wilson Boulevard, shall be evaluated and assessed for the
Board's consideration. The roadway's alignment shall be determined with public input and
taking into consideration the following, at a minimum:
1. Usefulness as a route for truck traffic generated from any earth mining operations in
NBM;
2. Usefulness as a link in the County's major roadway network;
3. Avoidance of residential neighborhoods, to the extent feasible and prudent;
4. Avoidance of environmentally sensitive wildlife habitat, wildlife corridors, or greenways,
to the extent feasible and prudent;
5. The costs of construction, including any related design, permitting, and mitigation costs;
and
6. The costs of acquiring necessary right-of-way.
Alignments considered for such east-west roadway shall include extension of the existing
Landfill Road, extension of the existing Keane and Brantley Roads, extension of the existing
Green Boulevard, and any other alignment deemed feasible and prudent. In consideration of
the recommended alignment, the Board shall consider the level of public benefit as provided in
subparagraph 2 above in determining the proportionate public/private funding in subparagraphs
5 and 6 above and the method and timing of any public resource allocation to the project.
t The western 1/4 of Sections 22 and 27 will be buffered from the NBM NRPA to the east by a
buffer preservation that includes all of the eastern 1/2 of the western 1/4 of Sections 22 and 27,
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 12
•
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
which would consist of lake excavation areas between the Wilson Boulevard extension road
right-of-way and the NRPA.
Other than the new and improved Wilson Boulevard extension and service haul road as
described above, all new roads and improvements in the Sending Area shall be routed so as to
avoid traversing publicly owned natural preserves, parks and recreation areas, areas identified
as environmentally sensitive wildlife habitat, wildlife corridors, or greenways, unless there is no
feasible and prudent alternative. Other than the referenced Wilson Boulevard extension and
service haul road any new roads and improvements to existing roads within sending areas shall
be designed with aquatic species crossings, small terrestrial animal crossings, and large
terrestrial animal crossings pursuant to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
criteria. The portion of Wilson Boulevard that traverses through the Sending Area shall be
designed with aquatic species crossings and small terrestrial animal crossings. The
implementing Land Development Regulations for the NBM Overlay shall address bike lanes and
pedestrian pathways.
c. Greenway
▪ A NBM Greenway shall be created within the NRPA or sending lands following natural flowways,
as contemplated in the Community Character Plan prepared by Dover Kohl.
d. Red Cockaded Woodpeckers (RCW)
▪ RCW nesting and foraging habitat has been mapped and used to delineate areas that are
appropriately designated as Sending Lands.
2. Natural Resource Protection Area NRPA [Revised text, page 951
The NBM Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA1 includes seven sections of lands and three
partial sections or a total of t 6,075 acres and is located in the eastern portion of the NBM Overlay.
This area comprises about thirty-nine percent of the NBM Overlay. The NBM NRPA area has
concentrations of wetland land cover and listed species habitat, consistent with other Rural Fringe
NRPA's. This consideration combined with the fragmented ownership pattern and the state's desire to
purchase significant portions of this area warrants a different level of protection than in other NRPA
areas. particularly for incentives for the consolidation of lots to assist in the future preservation of
lands.
Planning Considerations
a. Consolidation
The County should amend the Land Development Code to encourage further consolidation of
small parcels.
b. Public Acquisition
▪ The County and the property owners should support acquisition of privately owned land in the
NBM NRPA area as a mechanism for protection.
c. Sending Area
▪ The NBM NRPA shall be designated as Sending Lands for purposes of the Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) program.
d. TDRs
▪ TDR Credits generated from the NBM NRPA may be transferred to Sections 21 and 28 and the
west 114 of Sections 22 and 27, to other suitable locations within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District, or to the Urban Area at a ratio of 1 unit per 5 acres from Sending Lands, or one unit per
individual deeded parcel or lot that existed as of June 22, 1999, whichever is greater.
text break .** ,# ,
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words . --e are deleted. 1
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
4. SENDING AREAS [Revised text, page 97]
Within the NBM Overlay are ± 4,598 acres of land that are identified as Sending Areas for the transfer
of development rights that are located in the western, eastern and southern portion of the study area.
The Sending Areas consist of the NRPA lands and ±5 and %sections west of the NRPA. The sending
areas are locations where residential development is discouraged.
Endangered and threatened species are located within the Sending Areas, including colonies of Red
Cockaded Woodpeckers. Therefore, the protection of endangered and threatened species including
the protection of habitat are primary planning considerations in this area.
Planning Considerations
a. TDRs
t Strongly encourage the transfer of development rights from the NBM Sending Areas to other
locations within the Rural Fringe or NBM Overlay outside the boundary of the NRPA, or to the
Urban Area.
b. Habitat Protection
The Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element for
wildlife habitat protection shall apply to NBM Sending Lands.
c. Public Acquisition
The County should support the public acquisition of Sending Lands in the NBM Overlay,
•
particularly in locations where endangered or threatened species are located.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
D. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay [Revised text, page 113]
t" ■
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 1.2:
The Overlay protects natural resources and retains viable agriculture by promoting compact rural
mixed-use development as an alternative to low-density single use development, and provides a
system of compensation to private property owners for the elimination of certain land uses in order to
protect natural resources and viable agriculture in exchange for transferable credits that can be used
to entitle such compact development. The strategies herein are based in part on the principles of
Florida's Rural Lands Stewardship Act, Chapter 163.3177{11) F.S. Section 163.3248, Florida Statutes.
The Overlay includes innovative and incentive based tools, techniques and strategies that are not
dependent on a regulatory approach, but will complement existing local, regional, state and federal
regulatory programs.
*** ** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 4.2: [Revised text, page 122]
All privately owned lands within the RLSA which meet the criteria set forth herein are eligible for
designation as a SRA, except land delineated as a FSA, HSA, WRA or land that has been designated
as a Stewardship Sending Area. Land proposed for SRA designation shall meet the suitability criteria
and other standards described in Group 4 Policies. Due to the long-term vision of the RLSA Overlay,
extending to a horizon year of 2025, and in accordance with the guidelines established in Chapter
163.3177(11) F.S. Section 163.3168(2), Florida Statutes, the specific location, size and composition of
each SRA cannot and need not be predetermined in the GMP. In the RLSA Overlay, lands that are
eligible to be designated as SRAs generally have similar physical attributes as they consist
predominately of agriculture lands which have been cleared or otherwise altered for this purpose.
Lands shown on the Overlay Map as eligible for SRA designation include approximately 74,500 acres
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stru-ok-thcough are deleted. 14
Staff Proposed GMP Amendmets CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
outside of the ACSC and 18,300 acres within the ACSC. Approximately 2% of these lands achieve an
Index score greater than 1.2. Because the Overlay requires SRAs to be compact, mixed-use and self
sufficient in the provision of services, facilities and infrastructure, traditional locational standards
normally applied to determine development suitability are not relevant or applicable to SRAs.
Therefore the process for designating a SRA follows the principles of the Rural Lands Stewardship Act
as further described herein.
text break , , ** *** *** ***
Policy 4.7: [Revised text, page 123]
There are four specific forms of SRA permitted within the Overlay. These are Towns, Villages,
Hamlets, and Compact Rural Development (CRD). The eCharacteristics of Towns, Villages, Hamlets,
and CRD are set forth in Attachment C and are generally described in Policies 4.7.1, 4.7.2, 4.7.3 and
4.7.4. Collier County shall establish more specific regulations, guidelines and standards within the
LDC Stewardship District to guide the design and development of SRAs to include innovative planning
and development strategies as set forth in - - - = .- , . -*= • =`- ) Section
163.3168(2), Florida Statutes. The size and base density of each form shall be consistent with the
standards set forth on Attachment C. The maximum base residential density as set forth in
Attachment C may only be exceeded through the density blending process as set forth in density and
intensity blending provision of the Immokalee Area Master Plan or through the affordable-workforce
housing density bonus as referenced in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element.
The base residential density is calculated by dividing the total number of residential units in a SRA by
the overall area therein. The base residential density does not restrict net residential density of
parcels within a SRA. The location, size and density of each SRA will be determined on an individual
basis during the SRA designation review and approval process.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
F. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay [Revised text, page 135]
The Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay, depicted on the Future Land Use Map, is
within the boundaries of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Board
of County Commissioners on June 13, 2000. The intent of the redevelopment program is to
encourage the revitalization of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area by providing
incentives that will encourage the private sector to invest in this urban area.. This Overlay allows for
additional neighborhood commercial uses and higher residential densities that will promote the
assembly of property, or joint ventures between property owners, while providing interconnections
between properties and neighborhoods. The intent of this Overlay is to allow for more intense
development in an urban area where urban services are available. Two zoning overlays have been
adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code to aid in the implementation of this Overlay.
The following provisions and restrictions apply to this Overlay:
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
4. Properties with access to US 4-1- US 41 East and/or Bayshore Drive and/or Davis Boulevard
(SR 84) and/or the west side of Airport-Pulling Road may be allowed a maximum density of 12
residential units per acre via use of the density bonus pool identified in paragraph 11, except
that no project may utilize more than 97 units — 25% of the total density pool units available,
The 97 unit cap will terminate when the BCC adopts, by LDC amendment, limitations and a
cap on the use of the 388 density pool units for any one project. in order to be eligible for this
higher density, the project must be integrated into a mixed-use development with access to
existing neighborhoods and adjoining commercial properties and comply with the standards
identified in Paragraph #8, below, except for mixed use projects developed within the "mini
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stwolc-thfelygll are deleted. 15
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
triangle" catalyst project site as identified on the BayshoreiGateway Triangle Redevelopment
Overlay Map. The "mini triangle" catalyst project site is eligible for the maximum density of 12
units per acre, with development standards as contained in the Gateway Triangle Mixed Use
District zoning overlay, adopted February 28, 2006 (Ordinance No 06-08), and amended
December 14, 2006 (Ordinance No 06-63). For projects that do not comply with the
requirements for this density increase, their density is limited to that allowed by the Density
Rating System and applicable FLUE Policies, except as may be limited by a future zoning
overlay.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES [Revised text, final page of FLUE text]
Future Land use Map [Added new Future Land Use Map Series map]
Activity Center Index Map
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map
Gordon River Greenwav Conservation Area Designation Map
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Future Land Use Map and Map Series [New map, following FLUE text]
a. Create new Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map.
[The above revision also affects the text entries in the Future Land Use Map Series listing appearing
on the Future Land Use Element Table of Contents pages.]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
[Include the actual Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Future Land Use Map labeled as, and
included in, this Exhibit "A".1
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words,stt#reagh are deleted. 16
,..
•
•
•
EXHIBIT A PETITION PL-20-13-00011091CPSP-2013-6
GORDON RIVER GREENWAY CONSERVATION AREA DESIGNATION
114,--17>tt*1 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
1 . k ivm.tl
\---A'
', g g- f 1 , 4 :;--.• i 1
1 I i 1
I:1.1111E1i ig.ini k 1
I 1
. .
GOLDEN WA PARKwiff
,---..--,, --,
c----
Ir-\ ___.-------)
!Ille/A
li I
---1-24 c-- I
rtr ,
1 I 4
r—r—r--• .g
p.„.„,til---1-1-'''' -,- , 1 i -71 :•
1
I. 1—nA
.'.----
- re 1
- , ' I ' M ii7., F------- ■ or I bi
ff
• \P:rzi, -=)
--, ,i CMG/WU,WrIli
• I' 1
: ;
r.„._...____I ___.. 1 _,„/ i,
).;:,,,-.,,,-:..•,:7,--v,-‘,: - .,""-- !ii 1 / .
1 .----/ f, 1---,..,
-i---------:',„:,: ,--671 11 ; - , , ,, ,,. i
---, T 9 EE
.7,__ -,....1, ,.,
,.--::,-,----1 i : i
i
,
!
1 *I
_1 „q. ,....-‘ i s---, ■ 1-7-x-r-A. 7,-7,-, a
SUBJECT SITE
I i
PL-2013-0001109/
1 I‘.7...1-,t-:-.7•A- \ '..r-----7 ..........7_ CPSP-2013-6
-1 r.115,--:::::;r;-:z:zi:112, 1 t.-771 7.1 ' :O• ,. Li:_,...:_,..-.2,i
t 1
LEGEND
riA sua.cr SITE
KAU
! ;PREPARED BY. GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION I I I .--- — — CITY LIMITS
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DINASION i PLANNING AND REGULATION! o Sep, IOW•-4
'DATE 3/2014 FH-E: CPSP-2013-6.DWG .
,••
....-—....._
mossommob.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT (ROSE)
I. INTRODUCTION [Revised text, page 1]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised text, page 2]
RE- • : * • • -
*** *** *** ." text break .** *** *** *** ***
Policy 1.1.1: [Revised text, page 2]
The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County parks and recreation facilities appear in Policy
1.5; subsection “G" 1.5.G in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for
determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development,
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** ***
A
$270.00 .-e t see- e . ' -e•. .. .e• •e- ••-• t- • t
year of the County's fiscal year budget.
1. Value will be arrived at using the per unit values for qach facif e- .. .e -
, - et• • •- * ••-. - • -• "-et•
•- ••••e-
• ..se'•,* V. - by-the
Gounty-population.
2. Where peer- 'e• - e e e ernmental--bodies-or the private-sector-are
available- - *-t* - . " *- -e-^ = •-• blio-on-a-oent-basis-,4hey
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
[Revised text, page 5]
GOAL 2: T- - • - - PROMOTE A PARK SYSYTEM THAT INCLUDES REGIONAL,
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WITH PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AND BIKE LANES
TO PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS
WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD(LOSS)CONTAINED IN THE CIE.
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words - • are deleted. 16
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
Stormwater Management Sub-Element (SM)
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** **# *** ***
I. INTRODUCTION [Revised text, page 1]
This portion of the Collier County Growth Management Plan inventories both the natural conditions
and stormwater management activities within unincorporated Collier County. In Collier County, there
are two (2) primary service providers with regard to the provision of stormwater management
services. The County's Transportation Services Division maintains drainage systems associated with
County and State Roadways as well as the Secondary Drainage System. The Big Cypress Basin
Board, an arm of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), maintains the larger,
regional surface water management systems within Collier County. The regional drainage system is
also referred to as the Primary Drainage System.
However, management of stormwater is concerned not only with flood prevention (a quantity issue),
but also with the removal of various pollutants picked up by the stormwater as it flows across the
County's developed land areas (a quality issue). Such pollutants can include oils, greases, heavy
metals, pesticides, fertilizers and other substances, which can have a deleterious impact on the
County's natural systems and, above all, its groundwater quality. Note that, in this respect, there is
overlap in the intended purpose between the Drainage Stormwater Management and Natural
Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub-elements Sub-Elements: both seek to protect aquifer recharge
areas. However, the emphasis of the Drainage Sub element Stormwater Management Sub-Element
is on surface water protection, whereas the emphasis of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
Sub element Sub-Element is on groundwater protection.
*** *#* *** *** *** **# *** *** *** ***
text break
One of the key principles of current stormwater management techniques is recognition of the need for
basin-wide (or watershed basin) planning. The stormwater management system has to be designed
so as to ensure that the final outlet point has adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the
upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design. Subsequent
development upstream must then utilize stormwater management techniques and systems, which will
maintain predeveloprnent run-off conditions so that the capacity of the downstream portion of the
watershed is not exceeded. In this respect, there is an overlap between the intended purpose of the
- - --•--• Stormwater Management Sub-Element and Goal 2 of the Conservation and
Coastal Management Element, including the Watershed Management Plans discussed under
Objective 2.1 of the CCME.
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
text break
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised text, page 21
*** *** *** *** *** **# *-- *** ***
text break ***
Policy 2.1: [Revised text, page 5]
The levels of service standards (LOSS) for drainage facilities and stormwater management systems
appear in Policy .-; - - - -" 1.5.0 in the Capital Improvement Element.
**# *#* *** *** *** *** *** **# ***
text break ***
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strue,1 through are deleted. 19
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
Policy 6.2: [Revised text, page 5]
Collier County's retention and detention criteria shall be one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the
water quality volumetric requirements provided in the = = - = - -
-- •-• • -• - .2. - 2 , State of Florida's
Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I (2013), or its successor, as it existed
at the time of project approval.
Policy 6.3: [Revised text, page 5)
Allowable off-site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25
year return frequency. The allowable off-site discharge rates are as follows:
a. 951 Canal North Basin 0.11 cfs/acre
a, Airport Road North Canal 0.04 cfs/acre
b. Sub-basin
(North of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
19, Airport Road South Canal 0.06 cfs/acre
c. Sub-basin
(South of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
d, C-4 Basin 0.11 cfslacre
Cocohatchee River Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
e.
f. Corkscrew Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
g, Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
Faka Union Canal Basin 0,09 cfs/acre
(North of 1-75)
Gordon River Extension Basin 0.09 cfs/acre
j„ Harvey Canal Basin 0.011 cfs/acre
k. Henderson Creek Basin 0.08 cfs/acre
I. 1-75 Canal Basin 0.06 cfslacre
in. Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin 0.12 cfs/acre
e, Island Walk Basin 0.055 cfs/acre
n. (aka Harvey Basini
d7 Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
0.
• • Lely Manor Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre
g Main Golden Gate Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre
r. Palm River Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre
S. Pine Ridge Canal Basin 0.13 cfslacre
Wtggins-Rass-BaSif4 043-Gfroi3ryre
g, All other areas 0.15 cfs/acre
t.
The County may exempt projects from these allowable off-site discharge rates if any of the following
applies:
text break ***
2. It can be documented that the project currently discharges off-site at a rate higher than those
listed above. The documentation required for this purpose shall be prepared by a registered
professional engineer, and will consist of an engineering study which utilizes the applicable
criteria in the ** " -- **- .=• State•
of Florida's Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I (2013), or its
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 20
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116114
successor. The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County and SFWMD
staff. The study shall include the following site-specific information:
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (TE)
*** text break *** *** *** ***
A. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS [Revised text, page 1]
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
2. Traffic Circulation Constraints
In many parts of the Naples Urban Area traffic circulation movements are constrained by the natural
features of the landscape such as the Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the
man-made variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport. In many instances approved
developments (some existing, others not yet built) block the way of logical extensions of urban
collector and arterial roads.
The single most noticeable constraint is the Gordon River as it extends from the Naples Bay
northward under the East Tamiami Trail (US 41)to its connection with the Golden Gate canal system.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
The characteristics of the highway network at this location resembles an "hour-glass". On the western
extreme, US 41 and Goodlette Road converge on the narrow "straits" of the Gordon River bridge;
while to the east, US 41 and Davis Boulevard do likewise. The result is the typical "bottleneck" effect
when too much traffic volume is forced through a constricted area.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 1.3: [Revised text, page 12]
The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County arterial and collector roads appear in Policy 1.5;
cubsoction A 1.5.A in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for
determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development.
Policy 1.4:
The standards for levels of service (LOS) of state and federal roads in the County appear in Policy
1.5; subsection "B" 1.5.13 in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for
determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development.
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 5.4: [Revised text, page 16]
Pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment
Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the South tk-S,. US 41 Transportation
Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South
UrST. US 41 TCEA (MapTR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long
as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures established in Policies 5,5
and 5.6 below, and in consideration of the following:
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struGli-through are deleted. 21
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 5.5: [Revised text, page 18]
Commercial developments within the South U-4,- US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception
from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Transportation
Planning Department that at least four of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
strategies will be utilized:
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Residential developments within the South 1:44, US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from
concurrency requirements for transportation shall provide documentation to the Transportation
Planning Department that at least three of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
strategies will be utilized:
*** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the
required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report
shall, for three (31 years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the
use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the
applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three 12), years of development if they are
deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three
year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another
assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three year increments until the TDM
strategies are deemed effective.
Developments within the South LiTS, US 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification shall meet all
concurrency requirements. Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments will
be subject to a concurrency review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated
with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway
network.
text break *** *** *** *** ***
Policy 5.6: [Revised text, page 18]
The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage
compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that
provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each
TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this
Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of this Element. The following Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas are designated:
*** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ***
In order to be exempt from link-specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide
documentation to the Transportation Planning Department Section that at least two 21 Transportation
Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use
and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring
report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three j years
following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of
the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies
DRAFT Words underlined are added;words staialc4tIcaugt are deleted.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
may be made within the first three al years of development if they are deemed ineffective.
Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and
subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment
shall be completed within three al years and in three year increments until the TDM strategies are
deemed effective.
.*. text break
Policy 6.5: [Revised text, page 20]
The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a number of potential, critical
need intersections, including an interchange in the vicinity of 1-75/Everglades Boulevard; a 1 US
41/SR-CR 951 grade separated overpass; and a Randall Boulevard/Immokalee Road grade
separated overpass. The County shall pursue such projects in a manner consistent with the findings
of the AUIR and through the development of the FDOT 5-year Work Program, as appropriate.
G%CDES Planning SeivaeslComprehensivelCOMP PLANNING GMP€DATA1Comp Plan Amendments 12013 GMPAs Outside of Cycie113-6 Singh GMPA Exhbf A_4-15
final.docx
DRAFT Words underlined are added;wards struslr-#leg#are deleted. 23
NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
NOtite is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hOld a
public:meeting on Thursday, May 15, 2014 at 9 00 A.M. in the Board of County.
ConwnisSioners meeting room, Third Floor, County Government Center, 3299 East
Tarniarnii Trail, Naples.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider recommendation,to the Board of County.
ComMissioners: to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity
(DEC) the Transmittal amendments to the Capital Improvement Element;
Conservation & Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future.
Land Use Map and Map series- Recreation and Open Space Element; Stonriwater
(drainage) Sub-element of the Public Facilities Element; and Transportation
Element; of the Growth Management Plan. The kESOLU11QN title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING 2011
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS
AMENDED, TO. FIX GLITCHES RELATED TO CHANGES IN THE 2011 EAR-BASED
AMENDMENTS AND TO REVISE FORMAI, iRUcTURE AND LANGUAGE FOR
INTERNAL CONSISTENCY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; CONSERVATION AND. COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT; TI-IE FUTURE
LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; THE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (DRAINAGE) SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC
FACILITIES ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF
THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC
OPPORTUNITY. IP1201300011091CPSP-2013-61
AU interey,ted parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copirn of the proposed
Growth Management Plan Amendment will be Made available for inspection at the
Planning & Zoning Department, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N.
Horseshoe Dr.. NapleS, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and'5:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for Inspection at
the Collier County Clerk's Office; fourth floor. Collier County. Government Center,
3299 East Tarniami Trail, suite 431 Neplos, one week'prior to the scheduled hearing:
Any questions pertaining to the documents should, be directed to the
Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning & Zoning Department Written
comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday. May 15,
2014, will be read and considered at the public hearing.
If a person decides to..appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning
Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,,
will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure
that a Verbatim record Of the proceedings is made, Which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon Which the appeal is to be based,
If you are a person with a disability Who need S any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no covt to you, to the provision
if certain asSistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management
Department, located at 3335 Tarniarni Trail East. Suite #101. Naples, rk. 34112-5356,
- (23W 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devkis.
for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners
Office.
Mark P. Strain, Chairman
Collier County Planning Commission
April 25,2014 No. 2023761
Naples Daily News
Naples, FL 34110
Affidavit of Publication
Naples Daily News
+
BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
3299 TAMIAMI TRL E #700
NAPLES FL 34112 NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF MEETING .
NOTICE OF MEETING ,
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
REFERENCE : 068778 4 5 0 014 6 4 2 9 Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a
public meeting on Thursday, May 15, 2014 atu 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County
59745891 NOTICE OF MEETING] Commissioners meeting room, Third Floor, County Government Center, 3299 East
Tamiami Trail,Naples.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider recommendation to the Board of County
State of Florida Commissioners to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity
(DEO) the Transmittal amendments to the Capital Improvement Element;
County of Collier Conservation &Coastal Management Element;Future Land Use Element and Future
Land Use Map and Map series; Recreation and Open Space Element; Stormwater
Before the undersigned authority, per: (drainage) Sub-element of the Public Facilities Element; and Transportation
Element;of the Growth Management Plan.The RESOLUTION title is as follows:
appeared Robin Calabrese, who on oath sc
RESOLUTION NO.
she serves as the Advertising Director C A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING 2011
Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper pul EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS
Naples, in Collier County, Florida thE AA MENDED, TO FIX GLITCHES RELATED TO CHANGES IN THE 2011 EAR-BASED
IN�NDMENTS AND TO REVISE FORMAT, STRUCTURE. AND LANGUAGE FOR
attached copy of advertising was publisl INTERNAL CONSISTENCY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; CONSERVATION AND COASTAL
newspaper on dates listed. MANAGEMENT ELEM NT;RECREATIONANDOPENSPACEELEMENT;THEFUTURE
LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; THE
Affiant further says that the said Na: STORM ELEMENT;AEI(DRAINAGE) F--THEB
ES ND FURTHERMORE )ECOMME DING TRANSMITTAL TTALOF
News is a newspaper published at Naples THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF-ECONOMIC
P P OPPORTUNITY.[PL20130001109/(PSP-2013-6]
Collier County, Florida, and that the s. II interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed
newspaper has heretofore been continuou rowth Management Plan Amendment will be made available for inspection at the
Planning & Zoning Department, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N.
Ppublished in said Collier County, Florii Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. , Monday.
y r through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at
da and has been entered as second clas, the Collier County Clerks Office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center,
y 3299 East Tamiami Trail,suite 401 Naples,one week prior,to the scheduled hearing.
matter at the post office in Naples, in Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the
P P r Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning & Zoning Department. Written
comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday, May 15,
Collier County, Florida, for a period
0 2014,will be read and considered at the public hearing.
next preceding the first publication of If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning
Commission with respect.to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he
attached copy of advertisement; and aff will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
further says that he has neither paid ni testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
promised any person, firm or corporati0: If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision
discount, rebate, commission or refund of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management
Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101, Naples, FL 34112-5356,
purpose of securing this advertisement (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices
for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners
publication in the said newspaper. office.
Mark P.Strain,Chairman
Collier County Planning Commission
PUBLISHED ON: 04/25 Aoril 25 2014 No 2023761
AD SPACE: 122 LINE
FILED ON: 04/25/14
, %�� +
Signature of Affiant ]Cf'
1.- 41--- AI ..
Sworn to and Subscribed ore m . i ld day of , ..4 . 20��
, wise
Personally known by me ((ice _ CAROL P01 IDORA
;: cwt •;* MY COMMISSION#EE 851758
°.. EXPIRES:November 28,2014
.lL•.0''1V Bonded Thu Plchard Insurance Agency