Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PBSD MSTBU Agenda 02/01/2012
�t PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION F E`" Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit IM NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2012 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1 AT 1:00 PM, AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, LOCATED AT 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 AGENDA r' The agenda includes, but is not limited: 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Approval of January 4, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes 5. Administrator's Report a. Community Crosswalks b. Community Landscaping c. Pathways i. Presentations to Adjacent Associations Update ii. Bicycle /Motor Vehicle Incident Statistics for Pelican Bay Blvd. RoadwaLr/Pathways (Chandler) d. South Berm Restoration Permitting Update Fiala e. Monthly Financial Report Hiller 6. Chairman's Report _ Henning a. Clam Bay Update Coyle / b. Announcements Coletta �jC], 7. Committee Reports a. Clam Bay (Trecker) b. Landscape Water Management (Cravens) i. Use of Invasive Exotics in Landscaping in Pelican Bay c. Strategic Planning Committee (Womble) Misc. Corres: 8. Old Business Dig, 31 1 -2— 9. New Business a. Clam Bay Restoration Plan Annual Report Update (O'Brien) Item #:1 0-1 b. East of Berm Water Samples Results Update (O'Brien) 10. Audience Comments Copies to: 11. Miscellaneous Correspondence 12. Adjournment ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE, WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT (239) 597 -1749 OR VISIT PELICAN BAYSERVICESDIVISIONMET. 1/26/2012 4:39:33 PM t PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2012 LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Pelican Bay Services Division Board met in Regular Session, Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida. The following members were present: 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Pelican Bay Services Division Board Keith J. Dallas, Chairman Tom Cravens, Vice Chairman John P. Chandler Geoffrey S. Gibson John laizzo Michael Levy Pelican Bay Services Division Staff W. Neil Dorrill, Administrator Kyle Lukasz, Operations Manager Susan O'Brien Dave Trecker Mary Anne Womble John Baron absent Hunter H. Hansen absent Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst Lisa Resnick, Recording Secretary Also Present Susan Boland, President, Pelican Bay Property Owners Association Kevin Carter, Field Manager, Dorrill Management Group Tim Hall, Senior Ecologist & Principal, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Jim Hoppensteadt, President, Pelican Bay Foundation ROLL CALL AGENDA Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Agenda Approval Approval of Meeting Minutes a. December 7, 2011 Regular Session b. December 14, 2011 Special Session Administrator's Report a. Community Crosswalks b. Community Landscaping c. Pelican Bay Boulevard Pathways d. South Berm Restoration Permitting e. Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park & Along Beach f. Monthly Financial Report Chairman's Report a. Clam Bay Update b. Announcements Committee Reports Old Business New Business Audience Comments Miscellaneous Correspondence Adjourn With the exception of Messrs. Baron and Hansen, all members were AGENDA APPROVAL Vice Chairman Cravens made a motion, second by Dr. Trec m enda as presented. The Board voted unanimously in favor passing the motion. 8520 J Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes 7 t January 4, 2012 ' APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 7, 2011 BOARD REGULAR SESSION Vice Chairman Cravens made a motion, second by Dr. Trecker to approve the December 7, 2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session minutes as presented The Board voted unanimously in favor passing the motion. DECEMBER 14, 2011 BOARD SPECIAL SESSION Vice Chairman Cravens made a motion, second by Ms. Womble to approve the December 14, 2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Special Session minutes as presented The Board voted unanimously in favor nassing the motion. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT COMMUNITY CROSSWALKS Mr. Dorrill reported he was very pleased overall with the contractor (Bateman). The project was substantially complete prior to the end of the year, but this does not mean it is complete. There are minor issues that the contractor is addressing including making adjustments to align the cobble paver rumble strips. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. Steve Seidel, San Marino resident reported several residents have complained about how noisy the crosswalks are and asked if a decibel reading was done. Mr. Jim Hoppensteadt responded that the sound is unusual and decibel readings were done in November but did not register as increasing decibel levels. Another reading is planned for February. Mr. Dorrill noted the rumble sound is intentional and meant to create a "subconscious impression" that there are midblock crossings, but not necessarily what engineers define as traffic calming, for example speed bumps. Ms. Mary Bolen, Sanctuary resident observed the signage at the Glenview crossing causes confusion. Mr. Lukasz explained the signage that is installed is required by the state. Mr. Bruce Beauchamp, who worked at a paving company for 43 years inspected the Oakmont crossing and re of the bricks have broken edges. He stressed the importance of checking installed bricks for damage and recommended payment is made that the contractor replaces the bricks that are not intact. Ms. Mollie Moffatt conveyed by way of Mr. Gerald Moffatt landscaping, and the lack of color and high maintenance of some ne non - removal of "tall and woody" { 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes January 4, 2012 i Mr. Gerald Moffatt said noise from the midblock crosswalks was expected and as a tie -in, the CIP recommended installing brick pavers at the three community entrances on U.S. 41. Ms. Mary Johnson, St. Marissa resident favored Xeriscape -type landscaping. Mr. Dave Ritger, Oakmont resident recommended doing a survey before moving forward with more crosswalk projects and does not favor the colors chosen for landscaping. Chairman Dallas directed staff to look for funds that could be used for future landscaping projects. PATHWAYS Mr. Dorrill reported staff explored the possibility of obtaining a third proposal for the pathways project. Due to an increase in the cost of asphalt, the first two proposals received were priced almost double of the original estimate. Agnoli Barber and Brundage (ABB) engineers are preparing a more refined set of pathways specifications and schematic plans to obtain formal sealed bids and this process could take approximately 90 days. Mr. Bruce Beauchamp suggested the engineers consider root barriers and edging along the pathways. Mr. Lukasz explained the pathway plans call for installation of rigid root barriers with slow release herbicide which work better than flexible root barriers. Mr. Dorrill added that the pathways are the property of the Board of County Commissioners and responsibility for maintenance lies with the County. However the County does not have the funds. Ms. Daravingas said many residents do not understand what the pathways widening project is and need to be better educated about it. On behalf of Montenero residents, she expressed several concerns: 1) the six trees scheduled for removal will affect property values; 2) plans reduce visibility at the service entrance and encourage more bicycle traffic; and 3) traffic volume does not justify the expenditure. She recommended putting the project on hold until the Board does a survey. Mr. Andy Thomas, Montenero resident was concerned the crosswalks would not have flashing lights installed, favored a survey, but did not favor spending money on a project that is the County's responsibility. Chairman Dallas explained should a decision be made in the future to install flashing lights, conduits were installed at all crossings at the time of initial construction. address Montenero residents concerns regarding tree removal and suggested curving the pathways Ms. O'Brien suggested placing Mr. Dorrill's recommendation to have civil engine specifications and plans for formal bids and until the Board can attain feedback by those directly 3 Dr. Trecker agreed and suggested forming a pathways subcommittee, or by the pathways project. Chairman Dallas did not favor forming a pathways subcommittee, associations affected, adding that publishing informative articles in the Pe Mr. Dorrill clarified there is no effort underway by staff to- refine the pathways specifications and schematic plans to obtain form 3.. 8522 pathways associations affected staff visit individual effective in obtaining feedback. move forward with having ABB Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes January 4, 2012 Mr. Lukasz would visit individual associations adjacent to the pathways to review the plans and hear residents concerns. SOUTH BERM RESTORATION PERMITTING Mr. Dorrill reported the Army Corps of Engineers determined the south berm restoration project is eligible for a nationwide permit. This is a simple process for this maintenance /restoration project to reestablish the side slope and improve the toe with rip rap within a private and platted drainage easement. Over time, mangroves have encroached on this area. Further staking and surveying will be done to determine the extent of mangrove encroachment and establish how much silt has filled in the swale prior to contacting Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) whether a letter of exemption is needed to trim mangroves; and South Florida Water management District (SFWMD) whether there are dredge and fill obligations. Mr. Tim Hall confirmed there is no public comment period for this type of permit. Ms. Cravens was concerned about the use of a nationwide permit in a National Resource Protection Area (NRPA) or conservation area, and made a public records request for all documents related to the south berm permit. Mr. Dorrill clarified the south berm maintenance and restoration work would be performed in a drainage easement not the conservation area; and recommended Ms. Cravens make a public records request in accordance with Florida Statue. UPDATE ON REMOVING EXOTICS FROM CLAM PASS PARK AND ALONG BEACH Mr. Hall reported on the conditions of exotic invasive vegetation along the beach and estimated cost for removal. He presented an aerial map that divides about fifteen acres of beach into five sections from the north marked R36 to the south marked R40. From the north end, Scaevola is prevalent covering 35 -40% of the area denoted by markers R36 to R38; and 15 -20% of the area denoted by markers R39 to R40. Overall estimated Brazilian Pepper coverage was 2% and there are 15 Australian pines. Estimated costs for removal of exotics were dependent upon method used. The Exotic debris removal method was estimated to cost up to $1,000 /acre per treatment. Exotics "sprayed in place" with herbicide method was estimated to cost approximately $400 /acre per treatment. He recommended several treatments to bring exotics under control then one maintenance treatment annually, to replace exotic invasive vegetation with native, noninvasive sea oats and sea grape to maintain continuity, and clarified Coastal Zone Management does have sufficient grant funds to remove exotics in remaining areas along the beach. Vice Chairman Cravens made a motion, second by Dr. Trecker to direct the Budget Committee to i $5,000 in future budgets for maintenance and removal of exotic invasive plants along the beach. The voted unanimously in favor passing the motion. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT Mr. Dorrill reported the monthly financial report ending December 2011 was also the end of the arter of 2. The Services Division received 85% of assessment revenue including a delinquent tax pay it hies. To `al expenses are $169,000 below budget because 2011 final pay period and health insurance expens of posted. Staff port the average monthly pay period expenses February 1. Afthh, - Dr. Trecker made a motion, second by Mr. Levy to accept the December month l n' t The Board voted unanimously in favor passing the motion. 1400�1 11 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT CLAM BAY UPDATE Mr. James Hoppensteadt reported on January 10 the Board of Services Division's Clam Bay resolution recommending a modifica, Regarding the Seagate lawsuit, there was no news and the dredging pert 8523 fs (BCC) will consider approving the ay Restoration and Management Plan. environmental review. I 1 ' Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes ' January 4, 2012 permit. Ms. Mary Johnson suggested before moving forward with consider other options that might affect less trees. 852 oard should get more feedback and t Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Minutes January 4, 2012 Mary Bolen observed children disturbing the migratory birds on the beach and suggested installing informational signage to discourage such behavior. ADJOURN Vice Chairman Cravens made a motion, second by Dr. Trecker to adjourn. The Board voted unanimously in favor, nassini, the motion and the meeting adjourned at 3:22 p.m. Keith J. Dallas, Chairman Minutes by Lisa Resnick 1/27/2012 1:59:08 PM 8525 0 i co \ \ ) 7 \ \ $ \ \/ \� ƒf j/ )] k± 2\ \0 /m Co }k a� \ \� �£ 5 ]C% }t£ N k (n k q \� � m Ei � e >w kC3 00 m �w mt 2w «> U� w0 a0 ■ O z « w v � v m S� /4/2 �\ �� ±7 =- o> 27 \4 oa Ew §o f� -- j/ E oc2{ \{ f2 2m 2 ° °k %a 77 �Q \fj \\ ±§ Ep \0 2 777 2/{ \% oa =o� a+ _ o@ / \- §� o ,m GEo ® {%]2 22k CL CD EE2 = /m )\\ / \\ ca ¢\\ $Qk ( ©¥ .2� :g cm > §S 250 a ) 7m$ I \t[k E/k 0 2 -_* 2)222 moa ��) 7> \m \�� {/2 c - ]2/ °= -20 e e2$ %gj /2 \t 2j]ae £_- f }c ff« - _ 2)(: >k/ 2 »a (D ,ca �]/ &«� tea% m=o7= -5 r- '® =- m w \R; \/� \)$ \# / ƒk § )f) °§/ (D 3: 80 )jE v )]E 2 o )\ /\L = (D co 0 0 is & \7 ®/ - ) E ° k ca \ k \/ \\ �§ «[� ® 2 \= )« § of \ _ - @ �) k ) 2 a / / \k z /kk m / E w o ) j ƒ LL 7 z Cl) LLJ j \ \ \ \ j § § z § « § j i j j> m /$ z i$ co z}/ \§ /§ \\ 2 §I ƒG eu oI §a. uw= of LO ±p n q §ƒ k/ §S \$ C \ < W k g \ § w c w @ d / E w § / \ § o § § g 3 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways. J. Chandler's Pathway Walk Comments (by J. Chandler) and (by D. Trecker) Page 1 of 2 From: John Chandler [ mailto :johnchandler219 @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:42 AM To: ResnickLisa Subject: PBB Pathway Walk Notes Lisa, Please forward this email to all Board members as a one way communication. I think it would be useful if other Board members took the same walk, at a different time, and took similar notes. The more data that we have, the better decision that we will make. John Chandler Pelican Bay Boulevard Pathway Walk Notes • Walked from the Commons to the North Tram Station and back. Took paper and pen and stopped and made notes along the way. • Started my walk at 8:30 AM on Wednesday, January 25 and ended it at 9:21 AM • Counted the number of pedestrians that I encountered during this 2.6 mile walk. There were 16. This equals six per mile. • Counted the number of bikes that passed me on the pathway. There were three. This equals a little over one per mile. • Although I did not make an exact count of the number of bikes on Pelican Bay Blvd, I would estimate that about three dozen passed by on the west side of the boulevard. About eight of these were in a pack. • 1 encountered no baby strollers or rollerbladers • 1 encountered congestion just once. A walker and a jogger were headed toward me and I could see that all three of us were going to arrive at the same spot at the same time. I paused on the pathway for about five seconds. Problem solved. • Pavement quality is good, overall, although there is some root upheaval in those few areas where there are trees • Several cars went in or out of the driveways that I crossed during my walk. Only one car had to wait for me to cross in front of it. • Observed one traffic infraction. An SUV exited the main entrance of Montenero and did not obey the STOP sign. The driver looked only to the left as she approached and crossed the pathway. February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways. J. Chandler's Pathway Walk Comments (by J. Chandler) and (by D. Trecker) Page 2 of 2 a , r From: david trecker [mai Ito: djtrecker@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 4:52 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Sidewalks Lisa - Please distribute this to the other directors as a one -way communication. John Chandler suggested we walk the sidewalk on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd. between the Commons and the North Tram Station so we have some feel for the sidewalk - widening issue. I did so -- up and back -- on Saturday, January 28 between 3:30 and 4:20 p.m. Here are my observations. There are cracks and upheavals along much of the sidewalk. I passed only 12 walkers -- no joggers, skaters or carriages. I passed 8 bikers (5 in one group) on the sidewalk -- tight quarters. During the walk, I counted 25 bikers on the street. No problems. Cars slowed and passed them. Car traffic was light, but steady. No problems with cars turning onto or off of PB Blvd. Good behavior all around. Maybe this is atypical. Anyway, that's what I saw. Dave J February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 1 of 12 FL RIDA TRAFFIC CKA5H Kt:I -VKtI DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE LONG FORM c MAIL TO DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY A MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC CRASH nol r-, IN A I- RECORDS. NEIL KIRKMAN BUILDING TAUAHASME FL 32399.0537 z DATE OF CRASH TIME OF CRASH TIME OFFICER NOTIFIED TIME OFFICER ARRIVED INVE5T. AGENCY REPORT tr HSMV CRASH REPORT t 0 2/ 4/ 08 11:55 NAM [:]PT 11:56 ®AM PM 12:02 aM ®PM 08- 00003823 72642641 Q COUNTY /fJTY CODE FEET or MILE(S) N S E W CITY OR TOWN (Deck a in city or town} COUNTY vo 64/54 7.5 ® O Q [] NAPLES (� COLLIER AT NODE R ar FEET a MILE(5) FROM NODE X NExr NODE ♦ ar OF LANES L DIVIDED ON STREET, ROAD OR HIGHWAY 4 a 2. UNDIVIDED PELICAN BAY BLVD ' AT THE INTERSECTION OF (Street, roIdMN9WRV) FEET MILE(S) N S E W AT THE INTERSECTION OF tuna• roedorhVi r) 130 [3 0 ® � GLENVIEW PL I Phantom YEAR MAKE TYPE USE ti£H. LICENSE K STATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 5 li . 2. HitbRUn 3 a 99 MERZ 0! 01 0102ZX FL WDBKK47FBXF233051 IR oYavr. ven.DRIVER 2a wiMfNtk1 ACTION 3.H /A %24 Rao 21. Trailer SNhr Arst PdK TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE TRAILER TYPE INFORMATION -___ - '- - -"-_° -- -_ter^ +- 11 10 9 rlNtle 2 Trader Damage dMnage - VEHICLE TRAVELING ON AT Est. MPH Posted Speed Est. Vehicle Damage 1. Disabling 2 Est. ®O [] ® 0 PELICAN BAY BLVD 10 30 $200.00 2. Functions 3, NO Danfegt - --�- -- dk Agtd S) MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER VEHICLE REMOVED BY: 1. Tae -I-Lift a or'- 3 t PACIFIC INDEMNITY CO. 001201428804 CLAIRE SCIPREIS zTOwor ePtPrauft 4. DOW > NAME -OF VEHICLE- OWNER (sameasori! ) ® CURRENTADDRIESS INVmbeaWStMA) CITY AND STATE ZIP Com SAME AS DRIVER NAMEOFOWNER (TmiW*rT- edVeHc4) CURRENTADDRESS (NUnl+trMdStrttt) CITY ANDSTATE ZIP CODE rr ONAM£OFMOTORCARRIER H (CGmmeeTlYYeHc40rtY) CURRENT ADDRESS (NUmte141nr151r 0 CITY -STATE AND ZIP CODE usOOTWICCM `WTlYtvmONNUMDets .4 NAMEOFDRIVER (Tatarmnorlwertic"t) CURRENTADDRESS (Menbersnd5trcet) CITY. STATE ANDZIPCOOE DATE OF BIRTH a CLAIRE AGNES SCIFRES 2310 SILVER PALM PL NAPLES, FL 34105 04/21/27 DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE DL TYPEREO, ENO ALCMIEW TEST TYPE 5 RESULTS ALCAP -C XW1W-. RES PACE 5k'R iMl. S. eQuiP. orcr. 5162101276410 FL 5 3 t'810°° 7. Line - 1 BKeth4. Refined S. NaK �""- 1 i 1 2 1 1 2/S i F42APDOUSMATl:RtAlS RACASM IfYtl.edics" WaIaer 4arptrurRKr aMmad er tM7a WAS IMZAR US A OM a)ORtV6R AN, 6HNGTRAN5POR Orr dXard sad i Iirlit rfnlbr t'orP t oItOR R9 id MATBIIAL5P1 f if YES OLPIAIN IN NARRA t .IONS 2 I.. 2. ro 2 - �� -• -" Lvts L m 2 t.Yet 2. no 2 239- 593$184 t.YK z. m 1. Phantom YEAR MAKE TYPE USE VEH. LICENSE * STATE VEHICLE 1DENTInCATION NUMBER 3 4 5 6 16. Vttfercantage T DRIVER 2, HKBaun LA 10 01 - ---- CHROME30412 19. DYerth* 2a Wo Afhk td ACTION 3 WA UN F1 7 15 16 iT t 1. TYSi4r Stew Ikst DOW TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE TRAILER TYPE i INFORMATION 13112111 10 9 of 8 Trailer Damage damvie - 14 VEHICLE G sic. PH st. Vehicle a- mage 1. dsaOGml 1 Est. ®� S ERAVELI � ® N�W1 PELICAN BAY BLVD 7 30 '$200.00 2• No Da magi 3. IW Damage � � dia -Dee sfmaOd .Al) M ?7 MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER VEHICLE REMOVED BY: TLYRoulticaLid 7. orl . a U NONE - BICYCLE - ---- ---- -- CCSO z. Tow 0-met Repast 4. otter ? NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (SameK t7nrM) ® CURRENT ADDRESS (Numb. arustrINK) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE SAME AS DRIVER ) CURRENT ADDRESS ("- *&- dStic -0 CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE NAMEOFOWNER (Walkr9rTO..efVd + c4 S El - -- C NAME OF MOTOR CARRIER (Commercial Vehicle- CURRENT ADDRESS (N--w ad std) CITY. STATE AND 21PCODE M DOT Or ICC MC IDRMFICA111011 NUMBEt 10 NAME OF DRIVER (rake harm OHw. OM-) CURRENT ADDRESS (NunbvandsWill) CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE DATE OF BIRTH a MARVIN 3AFFE 81 SEAGATE OR UNIT 702 NAPLES, FL34108 07 -16 -1936 DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE OL TYPE 0.E0.. END ALC /ORWTfSTTYPE 5 RESULT'S ALC/OAVG PHYS.DFT Rt3, RACE SEC tN). 5• rAUIP. FJ6CT. $100585362560 FL E 3 L' 8100° 2 Lime 2. BnMh a RM.aM 5. Nona - -�`" 1 1 2 1 1 2 6/ 7 2 MASAR MA A PLACARU02 DYeT, kmecYe mfinea401WI namOer ban di or hot WAS }1AZAR000S R OatMF1D DRIYBI 6151111 , txllVflt'5 PHONE MO. OOltOmdd MAR IVURDllt07 IF YES EXPLAIN W NARRAmVE BEING TRANSPORTED oi4t+rd and l 4Alt teanberham 2 2 239- 261 -9122 I.Yet 2. rw 2 .,� 2, _ 2 I.Ytt z re Lye; 2. ro VEHICLE TYPE VEHICLE USE TRAILER TYPE RESIDENCE (Driver/Ped,l PHYSICAL DEFECTS ALCOFIOVORUG USE LOCATION Ul AUaiKOAe i M to Trampxtstwa cislaiNsenilladw 1 COUAY 01 CNttl I No Dde is Known lame Lkirtiirq W L%k g Drug IN VEHICLE 02 Van 2CanmerCLrl Pastengas 02TIF.Jem Seml Trader 2 DSawlere in StAtt 2xvionghaoort 2Ak01ty -LhW t,4.Wt LFrOrrtld e 01 Lg7N ThCWP. U. 2W 4 rest tires 01COmnwciSl Cargo 03TM0, Trader 3 NaYReikkiat oft OStAt 3f*4WAS4lp 3 Dnpc- eider tn6aPee W McMum Truck .4 M rHre ' Nekk 1r&,%0* #t,M SaWt W%,,t &tW Wkro 4Meimn Ctkc[ 2Frplt Celt DL TYPIE RACE D nj D)M•JW TIN<k- 2 or more feat axle% 05"K Schw 8. 05 esft Trailer 5.1snas 5"Wooln Onnking 3Frort Plot 00 TnKk Tracts (r:abBObtail) 06 PrrYMe$cIW Gw 06 Vtaity rrN4r lA 28 3C 1YnOte 65tlzutL rAtepfv, elXwot 7OtM Y GPtmd.rq Al.ClOROC.'rtst Rttrlet 4RearteR WMOtoribme(RV) 7AmbiAime 07 Horse hail. 4LYCh7MYr 5Pl01'"or 26Iick 3HSpMfc TReereety Gala,PgM INJURYSEVERITY SAFETY EQUIPMENT IN USE .C- 08 91a(dma.W&I: tar 9- 15) (drifC.'�SeNf firorh l5) LAIN bikimemet OG Mice Trailer Verfde 8V OPS.-Reft. 7N- 400.1 7 I Body of Track IN" 1NOtlntrst w 10 is )oeKyck :OM&IReaciq BMixra Y IDTowed r enslf n 2POfSid. 2SOM88ty5far4der mar aBUS P45ftreler REWIRED ENDORSEMENTS S llMaarcycM L1 Dumr (bvP7nitrwt 770tr T/Orner 3Ci,64g- 90th. U 12MOpd .. 12 Dump /Maq 4 wepacaPACnaUng 40taPaCRatir+p 4Air Beg- CIIPIaYrt NpI* IYee EJECTED i U AI Termin veNc* 13Caaci*tk ARf. 21`wlioe SFMY(whtte30osye) SAir bag - Not Deaw 14 Train aw0 x ihsi, I No 614on- Tral6c Fat.i ty 6 Saf ty Hoiniet ye 2Ytl 15 t a, SMINIVYlcle 140iw 1S Cbwvan 3 N Eldimemela 7EYEPNtewce 71 OUier 710ther It"064 1 1 3 PARIai HSMV -90005 (Re". 1/02) Pape 1 or 4 iT"' r�1 �y W V) February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 2 of 12 OR 1. Phantom YEAR MAKE TYPE USE VEH. LICENSE a STATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2 3 y �� 6 :s. uneertantsge 7 ACTION 3. HIIBRUn D 15. Orertvw 20. Ou ewtl.do 1 15 Ili 17 B 21, Trade, $ TRAILER OR TOW HX1E TRAILER TYPE e INFORMATION Sgwnestpdmt 14131211109 I ".I VEHICLE TRAVELING ON AT Est. MPH Posted Speed D Est, Veh(Cle Damage i. Disablln0 t 1 N S E W Est. 2. WncNpnal Trailer Damage t9mage L ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. N0 Damage Ard tlrtk e0 are Jantap %( %) n MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPAN (LIABILITY OR PIP} POLICY NUMBER VEHICLE REMOVED BY: i. row Retattonust 3. nrtwr ❑ L Z TOw Owne+S Request 4. Other 3 7 NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (5alnea 0"'w} ❑ ENT AO DRESS (FAanbtratdstreEU CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE NAMEOFOWNER (Trar4ror TowedVN4Clc) CURRENT S <NSnbKarid Sttyet) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF MOTOR CARRIER (Commercial Vehkn Oriy) CURRENT ADDRESS Ouvoke, Ar real) CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE S DOTor ICC MC IOBITIFICATION NUM MS p NAME OF DRIVER (Tare Fr LVh TrLICaee) CURRENT ADDRESS (lAMW - dStreet) CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE GATE OF BIRTH a a DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER SLATE QL TYPE REO. FWD ALC/l7R T T PIK RrSULTS AtC/CRUG RtS. RACe SIX IN). S, eQUIP, 1. Blood 3. Unite 11!111317T. : erexn�, n.naTa s Rae ZAR MA1 tALS ,tACAADFD I yea, irdkate names a4gtrrm0ar nbndl ar OO.s W.11WZAR0005 ReCOMM DR1VBr wM, ORI he NO. HGTPANSFOR mplac",hal t del number eOm Whom or tlamatl NATlTItkI SPI 7 IF)S B(PIAINWNARRA Lyn 2. ro 1.Ta 2, no I.W, I. Yes 2, no PROPERTY DAMAGED -OTHER THAN VEHICLES EST. AMOUNT OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 1 IN PROPERTY DAMAGED - OTHER THAN VEHICLES EST. AMOUNT OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE Z Z S CONTRIBUTING CAUSES - DRIVERIPEDESTRIAN VEHICLE DEFECT VEHICLE MOVEMENT VEHICLE SPECIAL FUNCTIONS 0I AklI. roW CkK*WACtkn ❑ ❑ ❑ Ot lb OelKts 02 0 2❑ ❑] Ot Straight Ahead ) 2 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ LNae O o ❑ Dl Carde55 O^Wnp (6�plem in Narrative) rD faOad TO tltld Riglt•d-Way 02 01 Q CNW enkIn 9]NrKrySntpWhTlrtf 01 01 Q 025bwirgSIQPPW/SIaned 07 MAknq LeR TUm 05 01 a 21Famt ,Q Kr/it �J� tN Improper exKiq M OtlactivHlmppper Ot aackkq auR 05ingreper lane CMrge 06 Improver Trm ao� Ulan, �S«^no INStes,11 Nher, a00 OS Nakip Rto* Tem 05""aOlarres 5 EmerOeKy Oxrathort 6CaatructlONMxrkereree SOURCE OF CAR IE INFORMATWIff 07Akehgl- Urrler Indueloce 08 Drtes tAder Iratence 07 V/IMahkk7 wipws �� 07 EnerkgM1eauhq Parkirq specs 06 ROOerly narked 1 nW Applkabk 09 AtcrsolBOrtgiosw tinder lrArRwce ��� deck 77 An rptanin Mimpaperly narked ISMppnOPalo" to F.Ikheda Tm CknelY at li Nar »lwe) i0mak"U•rWit 11,061,40 lI mlveness or Rwwiy Vokle IVM1Ck Side ��0 L $1 11dis"rded TrxrKs:p7el 12 Facm*oSak Speed UM4 191.ropeytOld 77 All Other(W.010A In Nxrxrvel e.nver I 50trW illunlRoNd 1 = ❑ R LOCATION IODKvepardtOOthWTrask 13 asreyan7eOStPp Sign Calyd 02 No On Reatl isFyled l'o Nalry sin EryilaNtlNk 2l Orlrkq Wrong Skie/riaY 151nIPOper raisirq Oa tImM1 01 r7a0l Crassirq NWxlhtersKtim 07 riorkkfp Q a Q 02 Croafkpx lord -block Crtaswaa in %P 1rlaNiy� arapirrile 173-1 22 fladry/tike t6 aeve Lek orcKStr ps TWAUne 03 CrONSnp at Intersection Oe StaMny 2Primarily AR 17 Exceeded Stated spew Lanµ 23 VMkk ModMad Oe Watkny Maq Read With TrAk atatwOtz., 0.efidelRbl III Nm! 1 i ] ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 Ottttr tigTraw 24 DrhAr Distrction(ftlain 05 ria,keq Man6 Rea*AD"t TrAme 09 standing to RetlatrkR lskM ]OpenCOtaery In NiriatNe) 02 moww 06 VrontIV an VaNtk to RON 77 All Other (Blok(n In Nanxive) 77 All Other (Eaylain In 03 Entered 01 M Unkrown NxraUv!) FIRST /SUBSEOUENT HARMFUL EVENTS) ROAD SYSTEM IDENTIFIER - LIGHTING,CONDITIOf OI CWUshv with MV in tramport(Rdr and) 15CORKIanwilhahrnat O ❑ O W coition wrth MV in transpart(Head on) la MVhtt HpVtknpost 29NVrankly M[tNu:wK 1 nt—tabr emst 02 U.S. OB Prlvaty RpAdway OS DI hint 0200 01 N CeW.sbn with MV in lrarstlon(Ailot) t7 KV HldtiR(y prlengh ptle pRwl Oe rpaO WowxK 1i 0f� 03 Sate 77 All Wber 03 a7wn aCOai %ienwkh MV in lrampoet(LeR turn) is MV hi 0-drad 3l OiertVled I. 04C -1 (FAplYttn Of Dark (W 05 CdnskwrwahMV in traregM(Ripht tvn) l9 MV NI lbk:e 32 omeant hll can veNCie O5 LOex Nsrrativa) Oi Dark (NOfhlK llptK) str K hill m CaOtSron w0.h MVatraKmrt(Skleswµq) 20 MV tat cantrLKe mmerwatl 33T Tractahraper)ACq (7�' TUnPkyroe rown ROAD R CONDITION WEATHER OAD SURFACE TYPE 07 Cwlon whhwV in trawst 1,10acked Into) 71 MV rot t.taFKWtdaeunrS/raR NFtre I—IF 01 t)r/ OlCkar OI S1a9/taOVWStene 08, o10sIMr with p+Ald cN 72 MV hit trtdsirMeerN 35 &plpsb+ 09Cd0slpnwnh MV en Roadwry 23COVKb: ttliCaet "t"bw,q&%Srgn360gwraWlnrerrall aQ tO CdIKktAwokptlestwan IeCoaKknwRhtralllcgate 37 CarQ0 i06s orfhR o2WK 03Slppery 01 02CklM/ 03 Rain 01 02aaocktep 03 BritkARWIt 02 I l COnKdm with kfirtk 2SCo1Kltln wkncra9naltplal0lf 36 SaphratlonW urns 04 Icy 04FOg 04C crKe t2CWMI,,n ith bk,.Ie(One lane) 26 COW --wipe A-&WAO absce road j%Meda4enaeovt' 77AROtter 77 An other 05 pit 11Cd9sIon rahrnaped 27 MV till other Ned object 77Atl tKler( &pWn In r (Eholew NN/rrathe) (P.apiakl{11 TAR Other {erOlatn 4r h NrratN!) fteem e} tROAD CONDIT AT TIME OF CRASH VISION OBSTRUCTEDI TRAFFIC CONTROL SITE LOCATION TRAFFICWAY CHARACTER 07 Nv Odects 02 Olttf,willon with wanting Ol Ot vlshmrot Olecurad o2 rrwH4nare NNlhw 01 02spMalspatill, of Nb Control 06 01 Not at hterWtWRR Ya!grbndge OZ At VlOrtettion 01 strxlh • Hewn 07 Obeshn tkwi with wxrene o]PrkKVsh op-p vd" 075peed a caeca stet O]h+RUdc%d Uy lrRencdal 01 025tra1pK- r0t<aW ebnrgaet 03 OS ROadaidR repaiNcwetnAlkln Oe TIOWCrope /bushes 0454hool'one 04 &hewaV ACCesS 03Cewve- lih,41 D5 Lr»se sla&-m.tiefgs 05 Lwd on velache CS Utah: sold It lMtadegll -liz 05 RANr61d it pn ale property acurve -tio W.Sh AOtrs•see / low /hVh 066u,kYrgrRaeioldwt 06 Stop%Ion 12No Pessirgrdne 06%ridge 12 Toll bVWh ll 07 totes /nAV"d/e pared edge 07 SkIi Wbillobard, 07 ddd sipr 77 AR Otter ( &pida In O7 Ererarce mmp 13 Reek tens slop Ol ParM �ITnglvpp 02 09 slarxPrgwxs 07 waNiaVl <sed naA za4ce Oe cop 7) th other, (Expakl 00 0)Smnke Jeso —the) Q p9 FksNrq S91e NarretM) Raeroad skFW o Oe &it ramp 7me 0) PAr4lrq lot• pub# 77 AM Other (F,Agak 77 An other(EAdam In NSmx)1e) 10 Gkrc 100Rka /gw."B pbson 10 ParW0D lot -ptnte to Namative) 03CIrD NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER ut SECTION# NAME OF V( R. STATUTE NUMBEK CHARGE CITATION NUMBEK SECTION# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBET CITATION NUMBER o_ SECTtONg NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE C(TATILKH NUMBER HSMV -90005 (Rev. 1/02) Page 2 d 4 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 3 of 12 FLORIDA TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE NARRATIVE /DIAGRAM MAIL TO DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC CRASH .RECORDS NEILKtRK IAN BUSLDIN TALLAHASSEE FL 2 % Tyne EMS Notified (Fataatie9 TanO EMS Arrived (Fi Wti[ks t>rrly) Oate of Gash County/Coy Code Invest. Agency Report Number HSMY Crash RepoK Number ❑ AM C) PM ❑ AM ❑pM 2/4/08 64/S4 08- 00003823 ?2642641 NARRATIVE Vehicle #1 was travelling east on pelican Bay Blvdin the southern-most lane. Bicycle #2 was travelling east on Pelican Bay Blvd in the some lane. Vehicle # 1 had just completing making a right hand turn. The passenger-side front of vehicle #1 struck the rear tire of bicycle #2. Bicyclist #2 had abrasions on his upper body and head. Driver #1 was not injuried. Bicyclist #2 was transported to Physican's Regional Hospital.The bicycle was transported by CCSO to the owner's residence. Driver #1 was able to remove her vehicle. ASST PASSENGERS NAME CURAEHT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE Date of Both Race Sex LOC MI S. Equip, Eject. SECS PASSO PASSENGE E CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE Date of Birth Race Sex ILOC INI I S. Equip. FT- Eject. SEC PASS* PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE Date or Birth Race Sex I lOC 1N7 S EQUIP. Eject. SEC PASS PASSENGER'S NAME CURREN fleoli SS CRY & STATE ZIP CODE Date of Birth Race Sex Lac INJ S. Equip. Eject. SEC V PASSJ PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENT ADDRESS CT1Y & STATE ZIP CODE Date of Birth Race Sex LOC IN7 S. Equ' Eject. SEC* PASS 1 PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENT ADDRESS CRY & ZCP CODE Date of 81rlh Race Sex i0C IN] 5. Equip. Eject. N SECTION# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHAR CITATION NUMBER SECTION# NAME: OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER Wmwss Name C 1 Current Address City & State Zip Code Witness Marne (2) Current Address Cdy & State Zip Code First Aid Given by - Name 1. PnVsidan or Nurse 2. Paramedic or EMT 3. Poaoe Oft Injured Taken To'. By "arm 4. Cern'ned Su Alder s. Omer 2 Physican's Regional Hospital Collier County EMS Was If no, then where? is If no, then why? Oat. of Report Phams if yes, by whom? investigation 1. Yes nvestfifation I. Yes 2/4/08 Taken L. Yes 1. Investpeting Agency Made at Scenef 21- P Compfete7 2. NO a 2. No 2. IXher Investigator - Rank & Signature ID ea NUm r Department FHP SO PD OTHER CPI M. Varaly -�!, 2928 Collier County SO ❑ ® ❑ ❑ HSMV -9000S (Rev. 1/02) page 3 of 4 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 4 of 12 Glenview PI 1 � I I m co cc cl Vehicle 1 \ l..M: de 1 Icicle i I 1 I N.T.S. Page 4 of 4 #0 &000038 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 5 of 12 �] LAW ENFORCEMENT SHORT FORM REPORT DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE ❑ DRIVER REPORT OF TRAFFIC CRASH O RIG G I N ❑ DRIVER EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION r \ ! �J j Rev. 04!04 ❑ YDu MUST READ AND COMPLY WITH THE INSTT4ucroNS ON THE BACK OF THr. FORM. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED BY YOU, REPORT COMPLETED BY LAW EWORCEMENTAOENCY.,---�, .e DATE OF CRASH TIME OF CRASH TIME OFFICER NOTIFIED TRUE gFICER ARRIVED INVEST AGENCY REPORT NUMBER - HSMV CRASH REPORT Nl1MEER 03 Ice Z� O AM z -y1 AN PM Z AM TO COUNTY/ m CODE FEET a M.M) N s E W CITY OR TOWN (O'W a n Csy a Tows! COUNTY 8 3 4 ❑ ❑ ❑ . 111 m-e ❑ c{}�d+a2 AT NODE NO. a FEET ar MAAS) FROM NODE NO. NEXT NODE NO. NO, OF LANES I. DIVIDED ON ROAD a �t r tD DED THE INTERSECTION OF a FEET MEEM W FROM INTERSECTION OF EAT o n P4 /)� Y10 MAI(E(tlIN.MrC.fk.) TYPE ( 'AVowG�l/� LICENSE STATE VEHICLE FL Z164145W S o.*A. Frord R /rmst L /From R /8100 L18VA Rest R /ReV L /RMr EST VEHICLE DAMAGE VEHILEREMOVEORY; 1. Tow Ramlm Ulf S. OW U e 01 VaN* DamA/a K -±� 1�%OJVA..APid ..,s F /f -tW*V4 2. T..O.- .FMWN.Oew C MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY' (LIABNNY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER }�-rx ooTtcsslvsc "��ii 3sZ - 4+-IP`��/ i ° NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER 8w A SamaA.0." 0 CURRENTADORESS IN.. 0.1 &W SUNG CITYANDSTATE ZIP CODE " r -� � ,,� A z•� sr. -C&Lj La+� FL D m NAME OF DRIVER ChM RmI°� Lmn" l PEDESTRIAN CURRENT ADDiESS(Nu Aw and CITY AM STATE DPOOOE n ; Vi /''JNN� ✓A rO�tTSA� '1115- 1Z$I- S,.SLJ a-Zol L- :ilaxAtrf' b),¢ 79 W DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE DRVER /PEDESTRAN FORE PHONE D'vuvPDICSTAIANBINSI NESB PHONE RACE SEX DATE OF BIRTH 1 m PORRIiWIit ZN51Q I W� � iLaacodal m. Ilcaw) W P a NUMBER OF NAME OF PASSENGER CURRENTADOIESSP&�WdS") CITYANDSTATE 2W CODE YEAR Well. RIK et) TYPE INK IMICK III** Mc) VEN. LICENSE NUMBER ETATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 5° I I e CChWA of voteft FMe R /front L r Fmm R 1 Soo L 1 Side Ref R / Rear L/ PHIL ESL VEHICLE DAMAGE VEHICLE REMOVED Or. 1. Taw ROMIOA List 7. DAwr ❑ GO.T 2 Taw Ownm'S RKI." N. Dew t MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPNK(LIARRRY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER IChedl But It Sam As DMer) CURRENT ADDRESS ftoft V4 Stlmt) CRYANDSTATE ZIP CODE D 1 NAME OF DRIVER (IM* From Trim Boma/ TBI CLAft1NTADDRESS Jo1mbm and SaMl CITYANDSTATE aPCOOE 1 DRIVER Uce" NILBER .. STMT£ D lPEOESTRWIfATaE PHONE OR,"/PEDESTRIAN PHONE RACE SEC DATEOFBIRTH I I d NLet BEROF WAEOFWLSSENOER CURRENT ADDRESS INumbamd SMO pIV'ANO STALE ZVOODE YEAR MACE (ch" A* ML) TYPE ( car. W* bcV*, at1 VEH.l1CF1NSE NIUI�RR STATE YEHKtE IDEIRIFICATION NUMBER 'D 1 CNItic Arse fMA RlIt" L11*1 RIOW1 L /Side RtV R'R0 L1Rear ESLVENICLEDMMGE V£HICLEREMOVEDST: 1.TawRo eMUg S.D&& F-�'I I1:1 Dmape 2 Tae Owmer R97" N. DAw t MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY ON PIP) POLICY NUMBER NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER&tKk Cos E Same As Ori•a) 0 CURRENTADDRESS(Mebaerg SvW CRY AND STATE ZIP CODE C NAME OF DRIVER (Take from Odw Uema) / PEDESTRAN CURRENT ADDRESS (NOmbV mod Sast) CITY AND STATE 2%P CODE Ag DRIVER LICENSE NIANBPA STATE DRIVER J PEDESTRIAN HOSE PHONE DAN19M / PEDESTRW+BUSI� P41DHE RACE SEX GATE fIF BIRNN AaaCade) Anw Coda] a NUMBER OF FKSSEWj MANE OF PASSENGER CURRENT ADDRESS f*NMW Vd STMT) CRYANDSTATE ZIPCODE SECTION A NAME OF VIOLATOR FL TATVIE NUMBER CKk9OE CITATION NUMBER Cn 0 SECTION a NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER LD 0 SECTION a NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE MAW ViAROE CITATION NUMBER 1 PROPERTY DAMAGED - OTHER THAN VEHICLES EST. AMOUNT OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP S WITNESS NAME (1) CURRENT ADDRESS CITY &STATE ZIPOWE WITHESSNAME (x) CURAENTADORESS CITY a STATE DP CODE IINVESTifiK*OR -RANK d,SIDNA 79 DE%$R.i'TNf FHP SO Co I . ✓. ❑ ❑ ❑ Rev. 04!04 ❑ YDu MUST READ AND COMPLY WITH THE INSTT4ucroNS ON THE BACK OF THr. FORM. NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED BY YOU, REPORT COMPLETED BY LAW EWORCEMENTAOENCY.,---�, .e February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 6 of 12 DIAGRAM INDICATE NORTH WITH ARROW * 7S T-' 426 POL -IcA*4 �J &4P. WAIT►+�►Cs 7U PG1.►u -j -&XM,, PdALL7WAU *-1 WAS. V--zjxil4K, WF �iC ±1K3 ©NPiiBSt2�'f✓�L .e40,41ros.7 TEA A c; PVOW-d.0 �� GAq &-o n oq,-ro a^ ,vawAY C1� lNli I V 14t,o -J-1 �J- VO4CLA M0,10D a F IGb�tr,X,Y Z I A. � ,� )$?N:X- 3?T'GBCr. GmCJ - masm+wmt. R.CS �nlLt� r AC?L71t�STS2,.4J' L. /1/47771ajz SIAQ'S �:.IGfAr.dl� Feu. VIZIaS A*W dom iJa+ra.F vro7w '7ZBPe3 m*% fav-Tja WrVars.t.TN�ylcw OP to ►Gt lf'�p� sr.+4mD sma S+r7b To7..4" h6m n=r- dam= Ths—. i3now l.�y�ItiT »f0►� Ycae f 01 No WN00 wDA1q IACIPM nj 0 o 02 Cation dNnB (EV W 11 WIMNW) 03 Fttmprom BBKWM o of a a 05 Imp0pw lme Chwtpe 08 1mpropw ion ❑ ❑❑ 07 A1u►d • U dw 4Mres O, Nr Dias 0 2 �3] OD (W Ore1d �'�j On Udxwe>�ryer ®�u U" 05 Portia /Bloeer ❑ ❑❑ 06 S1ndng Made. Of sriytArrtW , fl a 02 / ! Be I 04 Nte6 �❑❑ 05 me" P44 Tun 11 P45&9 08 Chr1giy Lana 12 Ddveiar 07 Eratgltetrng l PdBq Span Rnmwey mcle 1 Nwr / 2 1311- 2 Fatm /FCcrettoM Sr"gw.lopeng n L 6 COroilcRE WillnrIoa 1 n 1 2 3 3DA.r S* ©❑ W1r 00 Dnrpt - thtder birtroe 09 AIOMd6 CNadl bdkaloa ❑ ❑❑ 10 Foeoecd Too n Dio p dW TnBc Bigti 12 E—ded Salt 'tw4l M t8 M4ropr Wd 19 D wo2wa ad Stop Sin 20 Dbregrdd DArTralk Control 14 Fabd I. AYieMn EpUp. I Vol 21 ltbkq VAOM 6li/Wp 15 inpn:w P.vey 22 Fie" PWa I6 0A Los dCover 23 WMiob MOSMO 17 Exceeded Staved Speed limit 2i Dr6orrDMnodon 18 0b -Al TraR 25 AS DOW (Eepq)n W N6Patw) 07 """'a" W"" 06 Doled r /Vehicle n nNarmlve) 08 PropaM Pad! 77 Ay MM (6pl6in pyy ti-Ir W Is ION of OnRnd 2 3 02 Not On Rod 03 SheuWw 04 ltteam 05 Tan tan PE N TM Ot Nirianacien 07 VArnong t 2 3 o2 Cradn2 N "bias 0--Wk b, Road mCnsq 6t"WoodiM ro ftd" wyiro �i ❑ wWiFinp Atotg Redd YF/r TrrBio WFlop 05 Yhmg Along FWad"wi TMe OR S W PoOodnrn UYM 06 Wali g on Veat In Read n AN DOW (EpA11n to Nonodve) IN Unlo- I Prinry Buniless 2 Erin] 3 Open cow" 1 Nmt 1 2 3 02 Naval M OWW ., J LI FIRST E M f ail N 01 Cdkirl WIT MV In Ttrttpon (Wr En4 45 CoFelen Will NNW 21 tN Ran Yi Oath I C Aard Uj 2 03 CoNdm Wlhwil Ternput{kpm 17 MVHAU*VPoIe /UgMPrt 3t 0wour ed 42 col"M Win MV 117num god 114W On) 16 MV He W I Sign Pod 30 PnQ ROW MO WMr ❑�� 04 cdkw"WV In Ttweprl p.tn rum) to MV M Oerrrtil 32 O0npalt Fell Rae Vehicle � 05 Coftaft Vft W a TtrnpeO (lplt Ttrrt) t9 MV M Ferrot 33 TOMITedr►tdd 06 Colk;on IR M MV arTtanepwt {SWttwipe} 20 MV tM C"t" I8ernr WW 34 Fin 07 C01Fti0n WAh MV n TrofpoWd (Sedod ib) 21 MV M Badge 1 PierIMAnert l Rai 35 E'q'A°i0e ❑ ❑ M Ca AM VM P6 4W Cr 22 MV lit Ti es151VtEbw7 36 Dmtd Runway 09 CaBiol W1r WV On 110rN1ry 23 Ca66n WWI Condra. a.*.& Sipe 37 CagOlau r Sill ❑ ❑ l_J 10 C46�Woh PtO►riv+ 24 Coiedr WA Ttrk Gale 30 Sao 10.11ry6 11 C08i0" Will TCttdl 25 Ceftton W)A OwnAtr.dw: 39 mean cn$3 r 12 CdolOt W9n Bicycle (Biim tare) 25 Conitiorl VOA F-.W %a Above Pod n Al Onx (EsfMI to 13 Cadnion Win MOpd 27 IW Ht DO* Fi od 0*0 nenalrer ❑ ❑ ?s COCIOI N Qe ROW 14 CD alWon 0 Tain O1 Mwwaw W Forest ROed 02 U.S. 06 Pr.aa ROrdey ® M SUN 77 A6 etwt(Egiin OS C., W Nanttoa) 05 Lad 06 T l Tow 01 DRY%" 02010 I/.j 03 Donee �1 w DrA ISdnI li�rg 05 Dort Ilk SBM ti O 88 t1NU+mrn 0 WEATHER AUD SURFACE 01 Dry 02 Wr 03 %wely p4 kY n Al Cow IEnpirr W NarrMa) Ot Over Ot Slag I Grow I Srrr 02 Umdy 02 Modem 03 Witt 03 8nd /Block O 04F" Z D4 Coloole 77 M OOIet 05 Din (Egian h n A0 OAU F plain W partY.t) N 1°) RO N CO SITE LOCATION I AY CHARACTER 01 No DAat 02 p0eil[ko1 YA Warning 03 OMmrefen wvw ftwc ® DS Ibd Undo Peoe:lCOnOCdn 05 totes,!" Mtk 06 Sha6den • S06 / teal Hqh 07 Han / Fka ttiratle Pared w Ce 91an1rtg Wager 09 Wam/ Pdfdrod Peed U1301 ❑ 17 A6 04et an In N 01 58ion Not OdaM Inclement Weelher 03 /Sp Y U, 04 Tree)Cenp /BOirt d 06 le on YWtilr 06 B **V l Feed 0bled 07 so"I e7moardt 08 Fop 09 Snrla T7 A60Aw{EM'lw ❑ 10 Glue M None" 01 No Special SpeW Len W Spoosowd Sign 04 Schad Zen 06 TnNCS,prd It POW NPLFram DB Sl* %m 12 No Pump 07 YAW 9V T7 AM Oboe m4Wn 08 R&0&4 LV t NWO&A 10 Rraod son 10 ! J Q it NotAlkdaotcaon)PRY491661 02 Ae irwnedic, a, kArmted By btnalnn OO orm"Atml 00 pinata it Pima Prop" 06 Badge 12 TOO Be* or Ewa Wiry 13 punk IbA Sary Zone 06 Ea WI^0 77 AA Oltr (Egttlrl W 09 pave Nttrrh/) t - Pthse of Sragnt -Low 02 SDroa+niggM n - dUe p gvi I m ke -I" C,r 04 Crera- UpwageI Zen W ❑ TYPE S t ' O2 IANb C+rtb �� HSMV -90006 Rev. 04104 Page 2 w 1 1 c e 1 I S R 2 J February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 7 of 12 L � 1-LUKIUA IKAt-I-K; UKA�11 REPORT DO NOT VMrM at TNIS SPACIR LONG FORM RFC M WM MHOWARV EA17W A MOTOR VERCLISS, TRAFFIC ClRASH ORIGINA1 REWRO4 HER. DAIdN1 SINDMO. TAWWF80Ff. M 2a 537 C DATE OF CRASH TIME OF CRASH iMAE ttFfM.ER NOW ED "ME OFFICER ARRIVED MVEST. A4EHCY REPORT MUNWR HSW CRAM REPORT NNDER 0 04 07 08 1:35 w 1:40 AM N. 1 1 :43 AM ®au 1 08- 00010728 07089091 W COUNTY I CITY COM FEET x x1651 N 6 CITY OR TOW" iCled YYr CaJa TOWUO COUNT 0 b4 2 a Naples Collier AT NODE NO. w FEET RULES) FROMIDOEMO. HEM WWOM IRIOFLANES t. d11® WSTREET. ROAD OR 111011Y U 6075 Pelican B8 Blvd o — — x ERYDED E AT THE MIER>A:GTION OF {:RaL,PMArMyA.an R FM MILKS) N E FROM MRRSECTIOR K(IR.AL ntdaRl -wj F 75 Polic= ft Blvd and Gulf Park Blvd ORNM 1. PhMdAlll � MAKE TYPE USE %T3k LICERE ISM6FR STATE VEMCIE RIHITIFIGIR71/ MII�R _ ] s 6 T Z to AR. ],NM 3 04 Merz 01 01 RGD697 FI WDBUF70,144R437158 1 n a • u A T• YA.r+rr 21 T. TRAU R OR TOWED VEHICLE TRAILER TYPE DOMRMATION y _ _ _ u D D H 70 s SWOFIWp . V&VAz TRAV9LLMO ON AT ELI IV" PoA,N LET. VO•CLEDAWYIE 1. oL.ero EST. TRAn" LIAYAM MIDID z ❑ IMvewa Ace= at 6075 Pelican B 05 N/ $750.00 a �. o•R.I 1 ❑ �� l MOTOR VEHICLE M9RMEE COWAW (LURRTY OR PP) POLICY MUM VE•CLE REAVY"M 1. DIM RrbRr Ue1 a dr a State Farm Ins 66 1477 -59 4 Driver /Owner xTI MOMANSRWP W eCUM 3 O WINE OF VOWS VOM Mo.% Da R S— Aso* -1 CLRSRRT AWRM DAAMW a•l SOMU CI77 APOSTATE AP CODE y w/E d tRA1tR (Tn4M a TW.d V.1ioll) CURRENT AtR>AESS (MR6R aWd 9l Mt) OTT ARID STATE ffiCCDE C MAINE OF MOTOR CARRIER lCW -M Vdi.W O.Q) CIAREHTAOCRESS INNOW Md DINER) dTY, STATE AND MP CODE U DOT a ICC NC OE RR7CATIO4 NIILlELS L W O •Inreaownol T.•. P-W OrlwrUbrRM)I PEIM:ffRWl CIARf.11T ADONfES (ARDR AnW 6uAa) HTY.8Tw1EA 27PCODE DATE DF SRiN L a Peter Aird Kill 4451 Gulf Stare Blvd #703 Naples, FI 34103 03 -26-36 d1RAWt LaaKHEHUY•F7, STATe WL RID. 70R,M17EAT rYPE Re•ut.T. wcoww DEF TES. RACa •Ea wa •caur. caEer. TYPE EaW. rtMa.+auR.a•bW. 5 1 I I_ I K40W1361060 Fl 5 1 ? 5 1 w,u«a FIAr,IAiW N.ROUIn IWIt1R4MINTIAraFN- w nAllaeWlUO! TrMS IOTAIr•dN Ri00IRBlURRYEA AFFXIa, ORIYEAa n•O•IEIW. 0 [ g6aeraeo. A ,o.r�umE.ISI>mt>IRlr�orLR.•oEO. r wrEwM ruse •RA•Y,MIRMIIRAi YI c 9 1 26393a� t�] ,T..t,. ,�..tR. OIEVBIi. Ar.PA.r. YGR MARE TYRE IITE UAWi UCBaK HI1IAIfR •TATE VliROR AYARlIFATI -r MIMW®1 ❑ – Sun Cruiser 10 01 – CJ4300599 a a..- TRAAER OR TCMIED YB6aa TRARSt TYPE INFORMATION _ — N a 1 0 P EORIYRfRalrs YEI/RaE TAAYFIIIIG ON AT l3R•iN PSMOSPIN pT,V@RCIFOAY)GE %use" EFT. TRNIBL DIMIAQE EOrMVB Q Pelican Blvd Sidewalk 05 30 0 i rb�a IIOIOR VON" RRLRANCE CDYMNC(LIAD•nY OR PIP) POLI' ~MMINEL RDIOVID W.' 1.T— fttW-LId ].04- o N/A Relative 2. TSORM. akn..M 4.09- 4 ic d MAYS Of VEHICLE OVA*R t0odat ff a— AY OrRR) CAAWEIT ADORECSILMIMF SW 8a 1 CITY AND STATE LPCOM MAZE OF OWNER(TnAM w T—W V-M-b) CURRENT AOO E=O&V WNM Strad) CITY MD RTATE ZIP CODE 0 C E NNE OF MOTOR CARRIER (1tn+ -dW VVMd.OIW CURRENT ADDRESS R•a� bM E"d) CRY. STATE AHDa COFE DEppT q� _ {' _''l,4 '' L - �1LJ D WW OF OWWR(TOO Fran DINT U—) I P'WUMIW CURRENT ADORENPill Oar MM BUM) CRY. STATE S ZIP CODE o~re OP t•Rt), O a D evom Fladen 808 47th St NE Canton, OIL, 44714 12-14-96 prT.gUIICE«aE HUAUEM AUAHIIO 09 PE8 RACE 8EI •1l E.fLT. �n–r7C�a(� S 4 1 2 N/A tR– � +M+-� L _I 1 1 1 2 d 1 2 wiwlmlwawrtwu FIFC.RW® MYaA al0lCAll R«RaFwRam RIRMMtrnor OH.oICatAM •a1a 11N,MOU.M IRTAU11pgOlaYEIU RFiaAM, WRr,I.I,'R P11G«[HO. Man nFARawlm 2 aI.irf.,InFROl oral wAiAIRW RWfia«fI OMMWMO. UwTNRFL AYR•iD 12 FYFABRAMrR«wASYE 2 239 5947655 ,Ta•2M. R NGE 1 LOCATION M F.4.+..... aR «WTwrMr«Rr. Ot ERO+s�Twbe 1CawilafwwY ,1MMW— I—dMWE wU. -OnPP Rf VEtRC1E WYM pl C.rlrlur.Idfa.,M'W«. rT�•Urn R��T...�r tNb.Mr.1.N AY• tEpryra O.A- twlrrJa•Mn,.au«s •�wwU.R Qm1.Ip1A TnMk7I.U: x«4rRM t— --Cr WTar n.Pr aMwR�lAOPt.t •U.I• aP•ap�IA.Y- tlirYr +Nr•ar,nN.n.a OLMRtrTlud -4—VrW OF RNcT -RPW -" 01 SAER,U..WF t d 4i 6tAdulERR 4IMMLi ORW tAtNMefiDTUP•LNEiM MSana 2p dcair OaFMUY2MA -iR tra,alraal- OS FVWW:•CbW Sri OS SaAR Thd• =— 611M SFr laYbB IFIRA ROM rE OATrld Tncbl(db8.6M6) 06M."Smde. astAftTra6M 1A 28 ]C /VRSa S SdM%RPRysT,ShdWd 6P-Eaq AiDO" T44t RRR6 4Raw LM 07 nM H— PM OTARbio OTH—TnN. 4OICk.~ 2Mk* T 51%—Ca ITV SAPETY COLRL'MENT USE WSr141- -. W6 -IS) OILwVWVMWRIE M►eI. TRSM 6EOPMW a'-I • .. TMd Mat C WSIW(Mla'•AaabM OrAf Yl) WFRW. WT4M ""d, •E01MC#4L IOM TMaM IIbM 2P6MRM Tn SIq 01 T110 ,O SkF•I. fOMiary WAMFT -r•oA iBr[BYlRMrAAArHaan •SIS ►aMp. Rl10WRW aM.FanP.arro C a N+b•WCYrf. ,/OMiO..Wrwrt AONr ICWPAliR •aW.M /wr .a..IP.WHa7 +N a" a -rT.a ♦O y ,a- Ta..ar Y+rrHb ]C d O All LW~D.PY/M NO«aq..r lldr 2w •NwTW Vfi MY •2.0*1,.A..t Iw ,a l.aM VMrkb tl C.WV- alb 6rA.n•.rr.a TE"Frdrmn xrr NOM AYFAN 7 MAW �4n �-,- r ,, b /R ,0'/ /or • F February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 8 of 12 t.lYwafn ACTION 2.1f ilbw 3.NA YEAR AWQ: TYPE USE TRARER TYPE VEH.UCEMMULANIER STATE _ VENUE IOENfIFICAIONNrABER fi 18 U tll 12 it 10 17 6 20 21 T3a.. 10 9 warwsrPO.eo TRA1LER �� S or4m _ 1 e rE--tT C VENUE TE�Vi (y'y'( ON AT Ed WH Posbd SpWd EyT.VBEgE pyAA( 1.U6sElip IF EST. TRVIER WIM4>` �°f 0" ❑ —CPU Ll l.J 4J IJ IJ — — - i.li DMW arm 1 � t V LN n a MOTOR VENUE MRANCE 03WAW IlLWM OR P" POLICY NUMBER VEN EREMWEDRY: D 1.T PoWIwW 1Q1r"r -- -- -.-. -- 2. Tw QOKa R l �. per NAME OF VENUE OW" Pad 800 Sm As Oka) 0j"NTA00RE5 P.,W adq" CITY ANOSTATE ZIPCOAE NAAE OF OY&JER �-AWW - WVdide) OLIVIENTAOMMPb1bwad%V00 GTTYAPOSTATE WCOM 3 0 C WAE OF MOTOR CANdM O.In ¢iRDr awl SlwQ CITY, STATE ANDZIPWDE US DOT or CC MC 09111FICATON NLIMBERS _ v0 NNE OF TRWER(Tata Im D— lawlss)1 FEOESTMN CIF4tEW ADOI*SS(1Wbw sd SOV4 CITY, STATES 23P CODE DATE OF SMITH O _ ORVERLICENSENLAM STATE Ol TTYPE PIRS DEF. BES. RACE SEx M7. T. rim fhb, I...SNw1s Tg5/4PORIFD ITN20 1Yw1F a FYFA00S/1TENNEORIOIdif MAIEIIFWWOMAI GRIM MACAPILM01110TOM ME OFWASM a IMWHVL SPRLIDI iTafi - 112D0 WJ"ME47NL FTEAE)RANNwWwTAQ natal tiiVH1'S PROPfJTiY ORMALLiFD•OTIER RIIVnIF70QES EST.ANOIM OW WSWLE QTY STATE ZIP PROPERTY ORNR W - OTHER THP11VEHICIL0 FST.A1MO1AR 0Yi6ERS 1tAhE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 2 3 - I Q1N0MPWWV*"/AdWa o a L•J fNC"Mar;ip�bNW".4 M Failed To YAW R14""MY abp+PwR.1A►+o 02 77 oBW TWO o7Ak6kd -LMdr Id ow Itr�,�-,,�1I IN Qsp. -13dw Mbrwa I�.�J f3fAA - OlP -lboor bbNlNa 16 11 Vosp "TM& S d t2E.OMMS86SPMlbd 111- Lad 13Owagrdd Slopor 2BaL"Wdd ONWTWk 11 FS"TeW AWEgipl Valid. 21 WADI 0ep Sid.ITWY 15, I I PwYO 22 F1"ehO PON 160Nw1A89fCA%W 27 Vapid. WW" 17 Eaardd Sbbd Spo.d lbb 1W Q1.sr L6Yads(FAp10iR of NR Daleft a a o o2W2116. b tYOrA lSISwATsas aoabd"arMpapK O1 Ol OS P�iRSA 101rod as S1 Mutt OTYMTk►sillYRpuR MEOIiNentl WOW 7? AM OYF b q� d a a a a TN Ol Ol 00 awaleLmesN 17 DO.W0 WC�1Y las 12 PoIQi'wM"11arRI Vehk* Np l�tmedrylPwbFO S1�77NOSar F+MIRiR pow ypMyW bMWMb.) Ig SYiV LLTMn 1NOW t 3 3 2FAM 4w 1 1 i� Iil 11R�e SMAIM OF 11001 App— t 2 S 2S011d"1 PWM 3 VW* SAe 1 1 S l7Elar POW OF COLUSK N 0t O81Tad Q 2 7 02 Nat ON PAW 03 SNPAW Ql Ql 04111" 05T LarN PEDE t TYPE gCasYlp Nbat ha.r.alaa" 07 W01iila Q a a QCabbB lamb" Ck'Imm 1 MTOd 03 CsOw'-setemedo 06SWAMOFIeft gYbYBAbq lbdllllTSfe bfbs %% 77 1Pb.a4 2 2 of M" 1 t 3 02 No+by lie bNrN4 77M 061w Polk MNWM" ISMYigAbsg RNd Apisl TaiC dSlwl0.," PwdaalriarW blAld 08Lfa10ggaWkWo7bod 77NOfw P.pinkNWaiw¢ 3Cp.nCawbP 03ENWW 1011011 so U90"" FIRAT / 0l QfalaW Vrh WMTMW W(ITW En is A00W 1 O O O Blherltrl WCNWWMIUWb T.m.pd("Mod i5W1Y Silo /SbRPaM 3DRnOfRw.dhbllbb. 02 03Co WWY&WbTW%%d(A1� OWNILWVPbk1 Fa WI. 31 0-h. 03 aCOGWOVAWWbTamwJLAlu" 1:WMC*W" 3ZO=" F;dFP=V4 . 11 114 04 06 CsfaimllddWb T_1MW FWTNO 18WIY Fm ATWeletlTtif,bSYN.d 47FUNFAW U.S. o8Pd".O.'1- SLAW 77"OBWi3TFaia Cawq MNareB.A) Ntad T Td gOalM Ct0w8 03 P.ss QI offtk PAW LL*Q lOak0b 8aaM ti8lq 06UW1e.n 06CdaiaVANWMTiwsPM lSihwja) 20WIfCWW%b8wiw VM qty Ww k7 Foil iE*WmkpMr"iM 34WCd.is YftWbTRSpd(8Nbdbb 21WH� R N OIC490WPVYMPM Car 22WPt TNSIS"1bt" 31 OwMiR -W oOCafefN YBRWWtbad.aY 23 Can" Vl10wr0N0eR Bw1o0. so 37 Carta wSid � 02 to CdkogM PdMin 21Cff0iWVASTadeC.e. MR apn.I dUiw G3StWwP 11 CWWM WMByeb 25Cd101a" 1VN C"NRAf.rrawa 30M.d.Cm"r+r 04 .C.&MWA %-rckF"LNw) 26Cds"aw01FNd ObjW A?NwPed 77NOOMfu*i.b T7NfkW 13 Ca8raoe Vd "Vol 2IMVHkO1IWFkW%pd NE-1 of Clow 02 Fog QI aFp 77AROPW (F.OWNin 013b0 /f"w 1wAft 02 BbrAbP 03 en*moatc OZ 04 Cawesb as f3M 77NOthw(E2W012 faLtf.farlWlTe:W 26Cd1dWVftUWI"OOfad0NPW ROAD AT TWWOF TRAFFIC SITE TRAFFICNIAY IN Ns Oba. 0¢a0rrdosMMLWdnO q Wdaiorl Mae Ob.owd 1210 k dWA." 01 No Cwtol 0SPP"spudlA.. - � - �' wOb.ralaaAYBAOUf MAN Ol 04 ROadLAdfftapir /cwwu0b. rio=ts WNW bbbiab os PwWdl6T.pp0Y.Pkb a 04TWS/GopsIDWM OSL*WOftVWW* 615P.d Ca bat AIR a F1aI�iaYl.aad 845dadZwe 04ftw4rAwes 05 T Wk SOW ti P'A.bd No WTm 06R ty aMON 04 a1 111 F1ww. Rgwb Omw4roa Ol 03.QAN -LOW a.CNw -U- -1 085hwbtws- SAILWINigh 08 BditiFmdGtUa 0651001 Sips QWPwwaO Za OS Bddp TZTd BNO W NOM /R"IthugbpWWWOR as 51 ,,Pbtr 061WO/PMdW lbn Lq 1 ❑ WSW410 -oriRl 00 Fag WSNSb T7NOfwEgW 07 you SW 7TMOOMWPMAin OrFI asTinlilp Ulm Nf ❑ of 08Mloagaw hap aPak ho SIlp LRe be ft" T 7NCRWJE 16 O Pxb%LAI -Abk W.Ms) 01. Pan 6t. t31pasd QI T7 AS Oafr M to Ghw In ta0faN7GNd! t0 l.014illla 03. Cwb SECTION/ XV&4OFVICLAT0R FL STATUTE NUMBER CIMRGE CrMIMNUMBER SECTIONS NAWOMILATUR FLSTA CHNIGE o _ SECTIONS N0AAWOFVICLAIOR R.STATUTENMBER aWiGE QTATICNta.0B6t > SECT"0 W EOFNOLATCR FLSTATUMM M3Bt CNeROE CRARONNiBER February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 9 of 12 FLORIDA TRAFFIC CRASH REPOrc i NARRATiVEIDIAGRAM NA4,70. OEPAWMENT OF RRSIWIY SATETY&YOIORVIDM .1Wf1C CRAM RECORDS SECTOR( WX IORIDSAN SGIOMq TALLA AUEE. PL 370&&OSOS I oo NOT WRRE IN THIS SPACE T ❑ AY ❑ PY TIYEENSARMYEDtFATAUTWOMLY1 ❑ w ❑ FY DAT£6 CRA9/ 04 07 O8 COIMTY i CITY CODE 64 TNYEST. AGENCY REPORT NUMUR 09- 00010728 HSW CRASH REPORT HLAMER 07089091 : Bicycle rids, driver #2 is a resident of Israel staying with her grandmother at 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd # 142, Naples, Fl. 34108 239 594 7655. The listed address for #2 is her husband's parent's residence in Canton Ohio where they receive mail. Narrative: #2 and her husband were riding seperate bicycles northbound on the west sidewalk for Pelican Bay Blvd at 6075. They wets on the sidewalk riding against traffic. #2 was in front of her husband who was slightly behind her. Note that #2 is six months pregnant #2 entered ed an unmarked crosswalk at the driveway exit for the condo complex at 6075 Pelican Bay Blvd. # t was existing the complex in his passenger car. Tfiere is a stop sign set back somewhat, @ IS feet, from the sidewalk. # t hit #2 as she was in the intersection, the collision knocked #2 down and she received injuries to her lower legs and possible other injuries. She was unnsported to North Collier HoTital by Collier EMS. Observations: I observed that them; was damage to #al's lower front below the grill left of the cuter lime ofhis vehicle. There was no visible dwruage to the bicycle, and that there were shrubs between the two parties as they approached that could have effected their view. Statements: #2 Stated that # 1 did not stop for the stop sign and hit her. WitnesslHusband Seth Fh dm stated that #11 slowed, but did not come to a complete stop, pulled forward slowly and hit his wife who was well in the intersection. Driver # 1 stated he stopped for the stop sign and was pulling forward looking left for vehicular traffic. lie states #2 pulled in front of him, he did not see her and hit leer. Witness Bonnie Bmdshaw stated she saw the collision but did not see if # I stopped or not She stated # I was moving slowly mW #2 was moving slowly. Conclusion: #1 careless driving/not kx*ing in the direction of his forward motion. #2 driving against traffic on a sidewalk entering a ng as a vehicle is exiting de mandt caution. t am not assigning individual fault bushes also obstructed both pwWs view. SEM PAM OURREMT ADDRESS Cm'& STATE A CODE DATE OF SMTH SEX Lac W rT . EST. C& F CURRENT ADDRESS WTY&STATE ZIP CODE DATEOFSIRTN RACA SEX WC w &eOli. pF CURRENT ADDRESS CRY &STATE MOOSE DATE OF&IRTN RACE SEX LOC w S. SOW IJOCU SEC' P CUIRENT ADDRESS CRY &RATE ZPCODE DATE OF MTH RACE SIX LOC w EJCC[. CURRENT ADDRESS COY& STATE ZIP CODE DATE OF RPM SEOI LOC I W SCRS► J E"T- d F WNU'.RTf AOCSR;" CITYA RTE ZIP CODE DATE OF SRTH SEX LOC w S. EOIRAP. F.A:Ot. .R SECTlow NA&lE D<YHOI/RTOR FL STATUTE IS1618ER CHARGE GTTATION NIMiBER 0 SECTION f NAME OF 1ANAT OR R. STATUTE NUM CHARM CITATION NI AU" WTNESS tMME (1) gl+PFJLTAt10(€$$ CRY&STATE ataDE Seth Fladen 808 47th St NE Canton, Oh 44714 Ta11F$s NaEnil CURRENTT ADDRESS CRYS SfA 7Ja COOS Bonnie Bradshaw 6001 Pelican Blvd N les, Fl 34108 Jit57A0 Dr -rWE 1. Phynam M N"o 2. PRiRISeit at M3. PoYn Often NARED Coj� EMS 4• C rktod lot AW&r s. OVW 2 TAUXTr) North Coia. Hospital aY -NNE Collier EMS WAS *KTKNMEREi YSIY3TRCIR710N Y. YES INDE AT SONET Lao 1. N FNo,TwRW* 9A4WDAT1ON 1. YES COAIPLE7E7 2 M0 �1... 4 OAMoFRaDRT 04 07 OS PHOTOS FYES BYI*On TArffJ4 1, TES t. arYEa1g117H(iAS1F7rbY 2 N0 � 2 QItBt Sgt Ed Wozniak 01 awaiiii iiIii!R 0508 DUARr&B(T FHP SO PD OTHER Copier County ShefiN'a Office ❑ ® ❑ ❑ dr February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 10 of 12 DIAGRAM - INDICATE NORTH WITH ARROW G•""rASs 7 / ao V:� �c February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 11 of 12 C, REPORT '� ICIi a.w�nr rcnrvrawcrrcr,r ■ �aavea■ rvesa7 DQ NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE ❑ DRIVER REPORT OF TRAFFIC CRASH ❑ DRIVER EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ORIGINAL +Z DATE OF CTtASti TIME OF CRASH TIME OFFICER NOTIFIED TIME OFFICER ARRIVED INVEST. AGENCY REPORT # HSMV CRASH REPORT* O 10/ 14/00--9- 7:08 ® AM ❑ PM 7:09 ® AM 0 PM 7114 ® AM PM 09 -27277 80289131 QCOUNTY /CITYCODE FEETor MILE(S) N 5 E W CTTYORTOWN (dKckIfInc�'ortmn) COUNTY O 64/54 1 ® 000 NAPLES ❑ COLLIER id AT NODE # or FEET or MILES) FROM NODE s NEXT NODE P # OF LANES 1. OMDEO ON STREET, ROAD OR HIGHWAY W 1 4 a 2. uNDivmEo PELICAN SAY BLVD. AT THE INTERSECTION OF (street, nwortao"i FEET MILE(S) N S E W AT THE INTERSECTION OF (street, rowattgh ay) ❑ 0 ® Q 6531 PELICAN BAY BLVD. YEAR MAKE (Cher. lord, etc.) TYPE (car, truck, bicycle, etc.) VEH. LICENSE NUMBER STATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 08 LEXUS UTILITY L2E016 FL ST]HW31U982052339 ack Aroas Front R/Froot UFront R/Side LJSida Rear R/Rear URear Est. Vehicle Damage Vehicle Removed by L T.PotationList 3 carver } t veldda x $500.00 DRIVER z Tow demo's R=est 4 Otter a OT VE IiX.E INSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER s AUTO.OWMERS INS. CO. 4245760900 t E OF VEHICLE OWNER (ssmeasorner) ® CURRENT ADDRESS (reanoerardsum) CITY AND STATE ZIPCODE El e AME OF DRIVER (Tate From ortvertterst) CURRENT ADDRESS (Nmoaand stress) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE b3EAN KRUPA 5814 GREENWOOD CIR NAPLES, FL 34112 n RIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE DL TYPE Dnvw/Pedastnan Home t &Wliedes4ian brAntsa Prone RACE X DATE OF BIRTH �s X6104604266SO FL E W F 05/05/1942 UMBER OF PASSENGERS NAME OF PASSENGERS CURRENT ADDRESS (Ntanber and Sire'!t) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE ® YEAR MAKE (Chev, ford, etc.) TYPE (car, truck, bicycle, etc.) VEH. LICENSE NUMBER STATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER CANNONDALE BICYCLE '� - Front Ton UFmnt R/Side USWe Rear R/Rear URear Est. Vehicle Damage Vehicle Removed by t Tow Raramhust >. Omer 7 T X $7,000 DRIVER z Tar arms Rapest ,,ova ! OTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER AMEOFVEHICLEOWNEH (saneeworwen ® CURRENT ADDRESS Pa.r,oera.dstreat) CITY AND STATE ZIPCODE ❑ C AMEOFDRIVER(TatePwnorhwLk e) CURRENT ADDRESS (NUnedanastreet) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE 2� SCOTT E. WHITCOMB 1515 SERENITY CIR. NAPLES, FL 34110 R[YER LICENSE NUMEER STA 01. TYPf (Mver n Nome DMeVPedestdan eu R x TH W325785693730 FL E W M 1O/iSJ1969 UMBER OF PASSENGERS NAME OF PASSENGERS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number amt Street) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE ❑ YEAR MAKE (chew, fad, etc.) TYPE (car. truck, bicycle, etc.) VEH. LICENSE NUMBER STATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER a u Anea Front R/Fmo, UFronT R/Skle USlde Rear R/Rear L/Rear Est, VehIde Damage Vehicle Removed by t To. Ratat Litt odr en T 0 > niaDa 7. Tea o..rra eagmst A. otter OTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER AM VEHI OWNER (Sett! .Dnvv) ❑ CURRENT ADDRESS (Nanb..4Stnett) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE e a E�DRIVER(Take Fntan Orarer Lterae) CURRENT ADDRESS (wnberard Sant) CIIYANDSTATE ZIPCODE !a N IVER LICENSE NUMBER SrA DLTYPE Rwerl sLiao Home Phone 5dver n tk,smess Prong RACE x DATE OF BIItTii a+ a NUMBER OF PASSENGERS NAME OF PASSENGERS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Sbeet) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE ,., H SECTION # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER 0 SECTION# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER SECTION# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL AT E NUMBER CHARGE A ON NUMBER I. PROPERTYDAMAGED OTHER THAN VEHICLES EST AMOUNT OWNERSNAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP iTNESS NAME 1) CURRENT ADDRESS CITYfl STATE ZIP CODE WITNESS NAME(2) CURRENT ADDRESS &STATE ZIP ODDE iNYESTLGATOR -RANK &SIGNATURE ID /BADGE NUMBER DEPARTMENT FHP SO PD OTHER OJS N. STEWART 3181 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFCICE ❑ ® ❑ ❑ HSMv:"004 (Rev. 04/04) ' NLA c ( Lj YOU MUST READ AND COMPLY M1TH THE 1N MC17ONS ON THE QACK OP THIS FROM. ® MD mRmet Acmie stowm m BY YOU, froRTCOMPLaw BY LAM FILFOKEMEN: AGENCY `�W 'k -12p c p February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5cii. Pathways. Additional Information re: Collier County Sheriffs Office Incident Reports Page 12 of 12 DIAGRAM INDICATE NORTH WITH ARROW VEN14CLE ONE (V -1) WAS TRAVELING NORTH ON PELICAN BAY BLVD. (V -1) ENTERED THE MEDIAN TO MARE A LEFT TURN INTO CROWN COLONY (6531 PELICAN BAY BLVD). THE BICYCLIST (V -2) WAS TRAVELING WITH A GROUP OF OTHER BICYCLIST TRAVELING SOUTH IH THE OUTSIDE LN ON PELICAN DAY BLVD. (V- 2)WAS EQUIPED WITH A FRONT ILLUMINATION LIGHT AND WAS WEARING PROT*CTIVE HEAD GEAR. THE DRIVER OF (V -1) FAILED TO YEILD -THE RIGHT-0F -WAY TO (V -2) AND STRUCK THE BICYCLIST (V -2) ON HIS LEFT SLOE guns LMNTLY CAUSING HIM TO GET THROWN FROM THE BICYCLE ONTO THE ROADWAY. THE BICYCLIST SUSTAINED MINOR IN)URIeS FROM THE ACCIDENT AND WAS TREATED AT THE SCENE BY EMS. HE WAS NOT TRANSPORTED DUE TO HIS IN3U=ES. (V -2) WAS TOTALED BY THE ACCIDENT. THE DRIVER OF (V -1) WAS FOUND AT FAULT FOR THE ACCIDENT. CONTRIBUTING CAUSES - DRI PEDESTRIAN VEHICLE DEFECT VEHICLE MOVEMENT VEHICLE SPECIAL FUNCTIONS i z 3 03 Kt lnweper ttwlilWACtbn ❑ ❑ ❑ 02ROOekces ❑ ❑ ❑ i z 3 01StmyKAlwd 0 � ❑j O2awWLdtT b`sn0d ilbrw O ID Q 02Canaiesa vlwwa (ftgltainMNerratiwe) 03 FARM T. YbW Rytt- d -ti/ap � Oi @pee.0rakes mwa*WSowoth7lres pl Ol mMauroten TUn 03 Di ��Q 3Mlee P1�� 1 1 sRecreritwal ��a 04 lmprow1501:10% 051nlPopw t—chi rys 06 vWroper it- a� 04 Dellow-flmprow ughts o5 wiav malt, a xkhq os Meklnpivat*Tlm 06 planes sal w9erRvOpttatioa 6C4mCeof CARRIER u 07AI[WCi- LtderlNidiCe Impence 065teenroNeva @ Windshield wipers 07raewly�ea�lropani Estate Botwir OaPropwN P. t Not AXW-IM O Q 9s+>rvm u der pry Aioow 60nw- Under lnft w * 0eOWPrntte/Vdt4le 77 Ad Othff (f enlr. DereOt "..AM) 091mixamv Parked lOMabrp lF7vn 11 Pa[fYq 2sNOWtp►a m 3Vatkieslde Q�Q /O Fdbwd TOO [bstlT 12 OOwwlas or Rttawey Volatla 401tvw I i as ded Tetiftsiaai 125KGedm Sam sow lima 19 I-pr0Q°tod 77M Other tawtn In MalTatha) 5Other 02Ma On Road © � ❑3 200Mre"i Ottar TYMlic 07 Crmsrq hx at lreasealon 07 t7ork1� Q 2 3 U ONeepwdd Step Sqn ToMakaaktr als'Ve le Cmard 03 SItRIde Ol Ol l4falled 310rMry Wray SkfrJweY 04 NedNn to pad 02GOeahlprt Mid•poCkCrgswadt oad w s 2 tsimprtlper Pesefro 72 flee'rypWm t67enc, leRdtenter OSTuwlaree 03 Gaisiap It heaaettbn Oe Standkgl �a 2kwooly DVdade"Wild 04 Via" AWV Red With Traits 1`41" In Road RtlitleraYi U fwcxOd sbtd sped lirrei TTSRC 24 dstrsaion (B�gain a3WdMyAlwVReed Apwnt Trsft 095wdsyptPdestwantsbrd 300=CQW&Y 03 Mate ❑1 ❑2 3 lBObstncbro InNer In Mwrxtye) @INVbA 06Werfdro en venrb in R4sd 77 AD 00w lfspNki to Merwyey » AR Other (6Waln In Nara 1 038awad Di 01 Be urkrown FIRSTS OSEOUENT HARMFUL ROAD SYSTEM IDE R N 01 CAdisti nwith MV in to nppRar end) bS.) wth wemN 29 NV mn MOO dt.%t wt l a a t @u& nafth leR.M.0 Q 03 DL" Q 02toOWOn with MY n ttwepat" don) t6 MV Nt agNsgn pmt 30RStalfraadnee. it I13smit 77A%~ 03 owwn 03 COGM- with MV nitar4ptrtlAryle) uMV td ldhlaY pda3idR Oab 330tetvnd WCae4y (F.PtaM In of Delt [Speetky %) d CORMMowith MY ntflmmuLdt tlrw IR MV tM awrdTall 330CU41wit ftlihvtl wtle Mum aerrw ) WEATHER fb fylWA) OS Co9Nbnwtth NV Mtn lneplrt{AlpM hen) 19 my Ml pseOa 33 TnrterRrwia }eOOJSI�a 06TunpikgAaR sus UW ewsfraw OGComlenwtth MV inttaroport(sidawkU 20 MV hit Coombe bawler wail 07 C.A. W Khm mtnmpwt(b«ked aft) NV Isl b4W0w7abAmvWrsR 3i era u at Dry Ol Cbe+ O3 sbprGraeeVStoR OB COIIMbnwWtaRkedw 2214V Ml trWslnLhary p' O9 Co01bnwlM NV n ROdreY 23CaRslmwR coW aknb —ks0t sV360owNrl —ay f 3Tt3�Im3 RSfdl oa 02100!1, 03571ppery 01 @CidN @�^ Ol @Rgttlep @ewaVtRaCk 02 IOUphfenwhhpd.bt- 24 oOk ssw MMtraaAC pKa � 10'af"� alcy Os twr,*da aeaKim MAhaishottetAetom ise7tle 39 mdanr eee 11 Co0lown 77 Aa Ot1+w 77 AN 77 AN Wier as Mt with t2Cdwbnwlth prVCla(Nke Wa) 26 CovsbnwRhNVd obtat aboca read 77 AR dhR (134saktcn 0- qISM3nwmthit) ffatlwnW 77 AM Otte,(tIWM L. 13capsbnwxh rw;ei 27 MY fat other OreD ONert INrTaGVei ) Nonrot e) AT T M OF CAASH VI fON RUCSED C TROL T E OlmoeDrrtONS m 01 YMi0nrot aOtCwad ono! p1 NTE O3 Nat at I.M.otbNRR X�toprMdpe t pht •ta+riA @OOfttNaialwitR Wamkq 01 GO InJaihere treaitler 01 @Speuw speed nrw 03 Sped merelwat @Attnbse[tldn 63 Wh *d by kawseabrl @ W?ede7 I @06astrucOwiwRh wsrwnp 04 Raw unner noodwaxstrOCtbr1 @ft ino nwFlodvOki. Ot TteWctops/Dwiks 04 schod tot 03 04 Atveway AOless 03 11Rlrate7OPwtY I ty++a taM OS 1ot4eavbt4materiait OSladonwdtb as Trd0c s;aai It Posted m U-t— 03 RSdroid r4a 06 stadders- seRJbw/Id9h 060dmkvtdrdow 06 slop can I2fq Passitglem 06 Bridge L2 Tall booth 01 HdoftlWveak: pared doe 07signsAbalbosrdt 07 Tidd rat 77An Otht*(e4m. to NarretNt1 O7&*,wve romp 13P4 bid IMO 01teYetl ORStadMOwala reaOSlrtece o OBPop 77 AI;War (f3liam 09srttlaie to Narcatha) ❑ roPis-"091t aOAwlrosdsow 06 eft romp 09Pa11,910 iadk 77AS Ottar (ealai. 02llroaed 09 worNpeisftGd LOOare Ip OaCG /aaW4ppwson 70 PwM+d 1X -pdwta In RaiTabye} @CVD 7)AR Other (rsmbkl:n NNntNe) "sim"0606 (A".04/04) Page 2 of 2 s February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Pagel of 22 January 25, 2012 Dear Pelican Bay Services Division Board of Directors: This letter is to formally communicate, on behalf of The Montenero residents, the concerns and opposition to the Pelican Bay Services Division's (PBSD) current plan to widen the walkway from 5' to 8' on the west side of Pelican Bay Boulevard. The views expressed in this letter are based on feedback communicated by a significant number of Montenero residents and their overwhelming opposition to the plan as expressed at our association's January 17, Board meeting. As you know, several Montenero residents and board members voiced their concerns at the January 3, PBSD Board meeting, as well at the January 12, Pelican Bay President's Council meeting. On January 19, Neil Dorrill and Kyle Lukasz, representing PBSD, visited our property and provided additional information about the project plan. Nevertheless our concerns remain, and The Montenero Board decided that it would beneficial to communicate these concerns in writing: - Montenero specific concerns - increased risk of automobile and pedestrian/ biker accidents at the intersection of the (widened) walkway and our driveways. - alteration of the landscaping in front of our building due to the planned removal of six trees and the likely increased signage needed to address the noted safety concern - Overall Pelican Bay concerns - similar safety concerns as mentioned above due to the large number of condominium driveways intersecting the walkway along Pelican Bay Boulevard. -loss of, and resulting imbalance of, the canopy effect along one side (the west side only) of Pelican Bay Boulevard with the removal of many trees at the completion of the first two project phases. -the absence of an integrated plan considering the walkway project and, as we understand from Jim Hoppensteadt, PBSD's plan to re- assess the implementation of a biker lane in Pelican Bay Boulevard. -the unknown total cost of all planned walkway widening phases, coupled with the uncertainty and doubt that the walkway widening would materially improve the safe passage of pedestrians and bikers. It appears the anticipated cost of the first two phases will likely approach $1 million; presumably the total cost for all planned phases will be a multiple of the first two phases. - project justification based on bringing the walkway up to code (i.e. 8') thereby reducing pedestrian safety risk, without any factual data to support the historical level of walkway accidents. We have been told the plan is not finalized and not formally approved; however, we understand PBSD has filed a permit application with Collier County and is receiving updated bids. We will remain alert to activities related to this proposed project and plan to have representatives attend future PBSD Board meetings and other special meetings on this topic. In the spirit of providing constructive ideas to assist in communication and decision making going forward, we encourage PBSD to: - actively solicit input and feedback from the broader population of Pelican Bay residents, since we do not believe there is general support for the walkway widening project (to meet the current Collier County code of 8'). - modify the plan to address the needed walkway repair, excluding dramatic widening. It was suggested by PBSD representatives at our 1/19 meeting that 6' widening might be acceptable to the PBSD. While this may alleviate February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 2 of 22 some resident concerns, it would not meet the county code objective, would not have a noticeable impact on safety, and presumably would not materially reduce the $1 million projected cost. These factors would need to be addressed. - provide residents with the estimated total cost of all walkway widening phases. - clarify for residents PBSD's position on: -if PBSD were to propose an alternate 6' widening project, how does this affect Collier County's view Pelican Bay's adherence to code and use of funds? -since PBSD is proposing to spend resident monies (collected through the MSCU tax) on a project that is the responsibility of Collier County (i.e. responsible for maintaining the walkways and roads), how does this use of funds impact the deferral of other priority projects that might otherwise be undertaken if the county fulfilled their responsibility? - ongoing rationale for proposing projects that are the county's responsibility, but funded by the MSCU tax. -and, PBSD's current thinking on: - plans for resurfacing Pelican Bay Boulevard. - plans for re- consideration of adding a bike lane on each side of Pelican Bay Boulevard (which arguably would reduce some bike traffic from the walkway). -if PBSD were to approve undertaking multiple projects that are the county's responsibility, what will happen to the MSCU tax rate, which is PBSD's primary funding source. - best approaches to be taken by PBSD to improve the priority given to Pelican Bay by Collier County for needed projects in light of the apparent county decision to fund the walkway repair along Vanderbilt Beach Road, but not along Pelican Bay Boulevard. We look forward to learning more about your current thinking and plans for addressing the high priority needs of our community. Sincerely, ,1 Robert A. Lauer, President For the Board of Directors Copies to: Keith Dallas, Chairman Tom Cravens, Vice Chairman John Baron John Chandler Geoffrey Gibson Hunter Hansen John laizzo Michael Levy Susan O'Brien Dave Trecker Mary Anne Womble CC: Georgia Hillier, Commissioner, District 2 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 3 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:55 PM To: ResnickLisa Cc: Neil Dorrill; LukaszKyle Subject: Fwd: Montenero Letter to PBSD Board Begin forwarded message: From: Robert Lauer <ralau43 @hotmail.com> Date: January 25, 2012 4:22:15 PM EST To: <keithdallas @comcast.net >, <nfn16799 @naples.net >, <jbaron @watersideshops.com >, <iohnchandler219 @gmail.com >, <]osiegeoff @aol.com >, < hunter .hansen @waldorfastoria.com >, <iaizzo @comcast.net >, <mikelevv435 @gmall.com >, <naplessusan @comcast.net >, <ditrecker @vahoo.com >, <teedupl @aol.com >, <georgiahil ler @colliergov.net> Cc: "'Andrew Cummins "' <aecummins @comcast.net >, <keithdallas @comcast.net >, <rdiarvis1469 @gmail.com >, "'kevin "' <kcshanahan @comcast.net> Subject: Montenro Letter to PBSD Board Please find attached letter to the PBSD Board regarding the proposed Pelican Bay walkway widening project From: Insoup [mailto:insoup @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:25 PM To: Robert Subin Subject: Project to Widen the Paths on the West side of Pelican Bay Blvd Shown below are email responses from Commissioner Hiller and Keith Dallas. Fwd: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening From : HillerGeorgia <GeorgiaHiller @colliergov.net> Subject: Fwd: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening To: med5 @comcast.net, Subin Bob <insoup @comcast.net> Tue, Jan 24, 2012 05:36 PM FYI - With thanks, Georgia Hiller Commissioner, District 2 Begin forwarded message: From: LukaszKyle < KyleLukasz @colliergov.net<mailto :KyleLukasz @colliergov.net>> Date: January 24, 2012 11:18:11 AM EST To: HillerGeorgia <GeorgiaHiller @colliergov.net< mailto :GeorgiaHiller @colliergov.net>> Cc: OchsLeo <LeoOchs@ colliergov. net <mailto:LeoOchs @colliergov. net >>, Neil Dorrill <neil @dmgfl .com<mailto:neil @dmgfl.com>> Subject: RE: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening This does include relocation of the irrigation, restoration of the sod and installation of root barriers where necessary to help prevent future damage to the pathway. February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 4 of 22 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: HillerGeorgia Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 10:46 AM To: LukaszKyle Cc: OchsLeo; Neil Dorrill Subject: Re: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening Thanks so much! Does this include all consequential costs like new plantings etc. ? Georgia Hiller Commissioner, District 2 On Jan 24, 2012, at 9:01 AM, LukaszKyle < KyleLukasz @colIiergov.net<mai Ito: KyleLukasz @colliergov.net>> wrote: Commissioner Hiller, Leo Ochs asked that I send you the total cost for the Pelican Bay pathway widening project. The Community Improvement Plan (CIP) that was completed for the community in 2010 outlines the widening of the pathways on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd and the north side of Gulf Park Drive. Construction drawings have been prepared for the first phase which is from The Commons (just south of Gulf Park Dr.) to the North Tram Station (just south of Bay Colony Drive) on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd. The engineers estimate for this phase is $220,000. The second phase would complete the widening on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd from Ridgewood Drive to Oakmont Parkway and based on the estimates prepared for the CIP that phase would be $351,700. The last phase for pathway widening is the north side of Gulf Park Drive and is estimated in the CIP at $138,000. The total estimated cost is $709,700. Please let me know if I can provide any further information. Kyle Lukasz, PBSD Operations Manager - - - -- Original Message---- - From: OchsLeo Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 4:45 PM To: LukaszKyle Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening Kyle, For your response to the Commissioner with cc to me please. Thanks. Leo - - - -- Original Message---- - From: HillerGeorgia Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 2:11 PM To: OchsLeo Subject: Re: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening What is the total cost? Georgia Hiller Commissioner, District 2 On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Ochs Leo <LeoOchs@ colliergov. net <maiIto:LeoOchs @colIiergov.net>> wrote: Commissioner, Responses to your inquiry from Mr. Dorrill and Mr. Lukasz are provided below. February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 5 of 22 r VR, Leo - - - -- Original Message---- - From: LukaszKyle Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 11:16 AM To: OchsLeo; 'Neil Dorrill' Subject: RE: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening Leo: The engineers estimate for Phase I of this project is $220,000. There are funds available in the FY 2012 Pelican Bay Hardscape Fund 322 budget. The plan is for the project to be put out for bid and the award of that contract to go before the BCC. Kyle - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Neil Dorrill [mailto:Neil @dmgfl.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 11:05 AM To: LukaszKyle Cc: OchsLeo Subject: RE: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening Kyle: Please respond as quickly as possible with the cost information. Leo, I have also asked our civil engineer (ABB) to verify if a 6 foot wide replacement asphalt path could still meet the uniform code for a "shared use" facility. If so that might be the answer as a 6 foot path would not result in any lost trees. The project does anticipate extensive root pruning and some type of rigid root barrier to prevent the type of problems that are occurring throughout Pelican Bay. Until recent activity on the part of several condos who prefer to leave all PBSD landscape in place this had been a very popular and highly rated project. Stay tuned. Neil - - - -- Original Message---- - From: LukaszKyle [mailto:Ky]eLukasz @colliergov.net] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 9:15 AM To: Neil Dorrill Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening Importance: High Neil, Received this from Leo Ochs regarding email from Commissioner Hiller about pathway widening. Do you want me to respond with the requested information or do you want to respond. Kyle - - - -- Original Message---- - From: OchsLeo Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 8:43 AM To: FederNorman; LukaszKyle Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening Importance: High Gentlemen, For response through me please. Thanks. February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 6 of 22 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: HillerGeorgia Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 1:41 PM To: OchsLeo; CasalanguidaNick Subject: Pelican Bay Sidewalk Widening Please provide the details, including all costs, for the sidewalk widening project in Pelican Bay. Why is this needed? Why are so many trees being cut down? When is this expenditure coming before the BCC for approval? There appears to be overwhelming opposition to what is being proposed. Thank you - Georgia Hiller Commissioner, District 2 Please also forward my email to Neil. Thanks! Re: Project to Widen the Paths on the West side of Pelican Bay Blvd From : Keith Dallas <keithdallas @comcast.net> Subject: Re: Project to Widen the Paths on the West side of Pelican Bay Blvd To : HillerGeorgia <GeorgiaHiller @colliergov.net> Cc: Insoup <insoup @comcast.net> Tue, Jan 24, 2012 05:56 PM Georgia, We are now reviewing our options and reconsidering our approach. We all are concerned with our trees as well. The issue is our pathways are currently designed to the bare minimum width. Current design standards are usually 6 feet, even wider if multi usage. The PBSD Board last month decided last month to think about how to interact with our residents and discuss it at our February meeting. We will keep you informed as we wind through this process. Keith On Jan 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, HillerGeorgia wrote: > Keith, > I've heard a great deal of opposition in the community to the proposed project. There is much concern over the destruction of the treescape, as well as concern that this expense is not necessary. > I'd like to suggest, as I did at the PBHOA, that such controversial expenditures be put to referendum before being made. > You have an upcoming Foundation vote. Maybe the question could be placed on the ballot. > I look forward to seeing you resolve what is causing many a great deal of upset in a diplomatic, considerate way as I know only you can achieve. > With thanks - • Georgia Hiller • Commissioner, District 2 r February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 7 of 22 From: Insoup (mailto:insoup @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 11:49 AM To: keithdallas @comcast.net Subject: Project to Widen the Paths on the West side of Pelican Bay Blvd Dear Mr. Dallas: Kyle Lukasz from the Pelican Bay Services Division spoke to The Coronado owners on Thursday regarding the project to widen the pathways on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd. We understand that this project was originated over S years ago as part of the Wilson Miller consulting study for the strategic vision of Pelican Bay. There are no current facts to support this project. If you wish to continue, we would expect that the data, as shown below, will be presented at the 1:00 meeting of the PBSD on February 1 at Hammock Oak. The claim that the widening of the pathways would be "safer" is clearly subjective and one most owners disagree with. Unless you have facts relating to current problems and enumerated objectives, you will be spending over $1 million without data to support the decision. Nor will you have quantified the objectives you expect from Phase 1 so taxpayers can determine the project's success or failure. We have copied the Board of the PBSD, as well as the elected officials of the PB Foundation and Collier County government. We will also share this information with presidents and residents of the other condo associations within Pelican Bay. Very truly yours, Arlene & Robert Subin The Coronado #803 7225 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 Statistical Evaluation of Proposed Project to Widen the Paths on the West side of Pelican Bay Blvd. (Metrics will also be used to measure performance if the project is approved.) 2011 After Phase 1 # of bike riders /day using paths (1) # annualized # of pedestrians /day using paths (1) # annualized # of incidents reported for entire year (2) Reported to Pelican Bay Foundation Reported to Collier County Police # of pathway incidents EMS notified (2) # requiring on the spot assistance # requiring Urgent Care visit # requiring hospitalization # of pathway incidents reported: a. Bikes hitting pedestrians b. Pedestrians hitting pedestrians c. Bikes hitting bikes d. Cars hitting pedestrians e. Cars hitting bikes February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 8 of 22 t # of bikers currently who will use expanded West side path (based on statistical survey) a. Currently biking north on PBB b. Currently biking south on PBB c. Currently biking on East path Footnotes (1) Sample of 5 days in season and 5 days in summer (2) Using paths only on West side of PBB From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 5:36 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Fwd: Meetings with Condo Abutting Pathway Please forward this to Board members for their information. Keith Begin forwarded message: From: LukaszKyle <KvIeLukasz @colliereov.net> Date: January 23, 2012 10:56:56 AM EST To: Keith Dallas <keithdallas @comcast.net> Cc: Neil Dorrill <neil @dmefl.com> Subject: RE: Meetings with Condo Abutting Pathway St Lucia - There were about ten people that attended and all were in support of the project. The Claridge - Approximately 25 attended with the majority not in support of the project. They had concerns about the addition pedestrian and bike traffic and how it will impact exiting their driveway. They also expressed concerns that the added width may lead to bikes traveling at faster speeds. Some thought that it might be something that would be nice to have but not essential. St. Raphael -Their Board voted 4 -3 not in favor of the project. Approximately 10 people in the audience were all in favor of the project. St Pierre - Approximately 4 board members and 10 people in the audience, all were not in favor of the project. They were concerned about added pathway traffic and the effect it would have on exiting their driveway. Marbella- Only 2 Board members and 2 property management staff attended, they were all in favor of the project. Coronado - Approximately 20 attended, the majority were not in favor of the project. They sighted the cost of the project, impact on trees (not so much this phase as the additional phase going to Oakmont). As stated by some of the other condominiums they were concerned about added pedestrian and bike traffic creating additional difficulty exiting their driveway and the potential to have bikes travelling faster. Montenero - Generally against project, concerns about trees being lost in this phase as well as future phases, impact on entrance landscape. Summarizing the reasons the majority of those not supporting the project are: * Increased pedestrian and bike traffic creating further difficulty exiting driveways. * Potential for increased speed of bikes. * Concern over lost trees in this phase and particularly in the future phases. * That the existing pathway is fine at 5ft. that just the root damage needs to be addressed. * Overall cost for something not necessary required. February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 9 of 22 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Keith Dallas [ mai Ito: keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 2:05 PM To:LukaszKyle Cc: Neil Dorrill Subject: Meetings with Condo Abutting Pathway Kyle, Could you give me a synopsis of what transpired at each abutting condo you have talked to. Interested what was general reaction of people you met. If different, (St. Raphael for instance) between Board and other attendees, please indicate. I don't want to put you on spot (I know your observations are not an official counting of votes) so I will keep it between us. I'm just trying to get a sense of how people are feeling. I hear all the naysayers, but also know from conversations with various residents throughout Pelican Bay there are groups that support the widening. I'm just trying to get a sense of how widely various views are held. Your meetings are some indication, recognizing that those against the widening are probably more apt to attend. Thanks. Keith February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 10 of 22 ROY & CAROLE CURBOW 7575 PELICAN BAY BLVD. #1004 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34018 TO PBSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS: 01 -23 -12 We wish to express our opposition to the proposed pathway widening along Pelican Bay Blvd. The present pathway is clearly in need of repair and some replacement - -but we submit the widening is unwanted and unnecessary. We have received emalls from your board members in which the phrase "challenged with traffic" and "heavy traffic" were used. Heaw traffic does not exist on the Pathways! Our opposition Is primarily based on a clear lack of Need for the additional width. We are unable to find any numbers and traffic counts, to support the need to widen. They apparently, do not exist. We think PBSD has a duty to support their actions and spending with documented facts and figures. This is an important issue and getting bids and submitting plans to secure Building Permits without proper support and preparation, should not happen. We respectfully ask you to reconsider the widening project. We made several traffic counts in segments of 30 minutes each and at various times of the day. On average, there were 14 pedestrians per hour passing on the pathway in front of the Montenero. The highest hourly count was 18 the lowest count was 7. One person every 4 minutes. There were an average of 12 bicycles passing per hour. The counts were limited to the pathway on the western side of Pelican Bay Blvd. We trust you will agree, this is not "hea ' or "challenged with traffic' and there is simply no need for an eight foot pathway. You may wish to make your own counts. The bike traffic is in two categories The speedy racers (most all of whom are not P.B. residents) and P.B. residents who are older and slower. The latter group is divided into about 75% on the street and about 25% on the pathway. Our contention Is that widening will bring a portion of the resident street traffic to the widened pathway. The new pathway will not have marked bike lanes and both groups will travel randomly on the left - middle or right side. We think the possibility of pedestrian /biker accidents is therefore increased significantly! A biker /pedestrian problem does not currently exist but widening will likely create one. r February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 11 of 22 Page -2- It has also been suggested the Pelican Bay population is increasing and we remind you that we have only one building lot remaining which will be a high rise condominium and accommodate about 200 units. Otherwise, Pelican Say is fully "built out". Any population Increase is necessarily very limited. Esthetics is another issue. Many trees will be lost and the opposition to removing trees is nearly unanimous. Also, a sizable amount of grass border and landscaping will be removed. Further, the new pathway will mean a redesign of the landscape entrance to the Montenero and we presume, to other condo buildings along the proposed route as well. A cost we would like to avoid. Our suggestion for a solution is to seek a 6 foot wide pathway 11 We are told the 6 foot path is Possible but needs both County and PBSD approval. This approach would allow the rebuilding of our pathway and give pedestrians and current bikers adequate width. Couples (bikes or pedestrians) typically move to single file when in traffic to allow others to pass and this courtesy has worked well for 20 years. " If it ain't broke -- - - -- The 6 foot pathway would also save some money. Not very much, of course, but some savings, none -the -less. Plus, the need to remove trees, grass or landscaping would be at a minimum. We will appreciate you considering the 6 foot widening compromise which is supported by the vast majority of the residents with whom we have talked. We do not believe it is needed nor advisable. We request and will greatly appreciate the board re- opening and examining the need for widening. We Are also asking for the help and support of Ms. Georgia Hiller and Ms. Susan Boland in this effort. Thank you. Respectfurlly, 4ftyCarole Curbow Cc Montenero Board Members All Montenero residents Ms. Georgia Hiller, Commissioner Ms. Susan Boland, Chairwoman Ms. L. Resnick, Collier County Mr. Robert Subin (Coronado) February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 12 of 22 From: Heather Allen [mailto:themontenero @aol.comj Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 12:09 PM To: keithdallas @comcast.net; nfn16799 @naples.net; jbaron @watersideshops.com; johnchandler219 @gmail.com; josiegeoff @aol.com; hunter .hasen @waldorfastoria.com; mikelevy435 @gmail.com; naplessusan @comcast.net; djtrecker @yahoo.com; teedupl @aol.com Cc: AECUMMINS @comcast.net; rdjarvis1469 @gmail.com; KCShanahan @comcast.net; ralau43 @hotmail.com; keithdallas @comcast.net; HillerGeorgia; pbpoa @pbpropertyowners.org; ResnickLisa; insoup @comcast.net Subject: Letter from Roy & Carole Curbow Good Afternoon Ladies and Gentlemen, Roy and Carole Curbow have asked me to forward the attached letter to you. Heather Allen Office Assistant Montenero at Pelican Bay 7575 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 239 - 596 -7797 Phone 239 - 596 -7697 Fax February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 13 of 22 r From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 3:52 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Fwd: Pelican Bay Blvd Sidewalks Begin forwarded message: From: "Daniel R O'Brien" <drobrien2(cDcomcast.net> Date: January 21, 2012 3:44:35 PM EST To: "'Dave Trecker "' <ditrecker(cDyahoo.com >, "'Geoffrey S. Gibson "' <iosiegeoff(cDaol.com >, "'Hunter H. Hansen "' < hunter .hansen(@waldorfastoria.com >, "'John Baron "' <Ibaron(awatersideshoos.com >, "'John Chandler "' <johnchandler219@gmail.com >, "'John laizzo "' <iaizzo(@comcast.net >, "'Kieth J. Dallas, Chairman "' <keithdallas@comcast .net >, "'Mary Anne Womble "' <teeduol @aol.com >, "'Michael Levy "' <mikelevv435(@gmail.com >, "'Susan O'Brien "' <naolessusan(a)comcast .net >, "'Tom Cravens "' <nfn16799(d)naoles.net> Subject: Pelican Bay Blvd Sidewalks To: Pelican Bay Services Division Board Members Re: Recent considerations regarding sidewalk widening along Pelican Bay Blvd. January 21, 2012 My perspectives regarding the subject of sidewalk widening are as follows. As a driver: Each time I leave or enter my building's driveway I must (very carefully) negotiate the crossing of the Pelican Bay Blvd. sidewalk. I have done this several times a day, six plus months a year, since 2002. 1 have learned the following: - Walkers pose the least danger. They move slowly and I can easily spot them in time to stop and give them sufficient time and room to pass safely. Runners are more of a problem in that that appear more quickly, moving faster and thus I must be extra diligent for them. We do sometimes inconvenience each other (they may have to run around my auto after I've crossed onto the sidewalk but then had to wait for road traffic, or I may have to pass up a good opportunity to turn onto the Blvd while I give extra time to a runner whose crossing speed is more difficult to determine), but patience rather than safety seems to be the issue. Bicycles on the sidewalk are my biggest concern. They appear very quickly, from either direction, moving far too quickly to properly anticipate. Too often only sudden braking by either me or the biker saves the day. I fear that widening the sidewalks will attract more bikers to them and will thus exacerbate the problem As a walker: I do not like to walk the PB sidewalks when bikes are present /using them. I am too often startled by bikers approaching from the rear and frightened by (seemingly poorly controlled) bikes approaching from the opposite direction. In another place and time I suffered significant injury in a bike - pedestrian accident on a (very wide) sidewalk (I was the pedestrian). Again, I fear that widening the sidewalks will attract more bikes and more problems. As a bike rider: I try not to use the sidewalks (I admit to being sometimes tempted), particularly when they are populated with walkers. I find it impossible to truly yield the right -of -way to walkers without stopping or leaving the sidewalk. I think it rude to make them do so. I don't see this changing with widened sidewalks. My suggestion is that we make needed repairs to our sidewalks but leave them at their present width and further that we encourage bike riders to use the street. This approach is the safest alternative for drivers, bike riders walkers and runners. Dan O'Brien The Coronado February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 14 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 6:49 AM To: ResnickLisa Cc: Neil Dorrill Subject: Fwd: PROTEST AGAINST THE WIDENING OF THE SIDEWALKS Begin forwarded message: From: Herb Hasson <herbhh(@Iive.com> Date: January 20, 2012 10:54:57 PM EST To: <keithdallasaa.comcast.net >, <nfn16799C")anaples.net >, <ibaronC)awatersideshogs.com >, <iohnchandler219CcDgmail.com >, <iosiegeoff(cDaol.com >, "hunter hansen" < hunter .hansen(c)-waldorfastoria.com >, <iaizzo(a)comcast.net >, <mikelew435(a)gmail.com >, <naplessusan(cDcomcast.net >, <djtrecker(cDvahoo.com >, <teedup1Cgaol.com> Subject: Fw: PROTEST AGAINST THE WIDENING OF THE SIDEWALKS We are sending this email to our friends in other condominiums on Pelican Bay Blvd. to encourage them to express their feelings to the Pelican Bay Services Division Board of Directors. This project is not yet a fait accompli and your protest may help. Thanks, Arlene & Bob To: keithdallas(a)comcast.net, nfn16799anaoles.net, jbaron(c),watersideshoos.com, iohnchandler219()g amail.com, iosiegeoff(cDaol.com, "hunter hansen" < hunter hansen(a)waldorfastoria.com >, iaizzo()com cast. net, mikelevy435(cDgmail.com, napless usan( cDcomcast . net, JtreckeKcDvahoo.com, tee duel O)aol.com Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:08:59 PM Subject: PROTEST AGAINST THE WIDENING OF THE SIDEWALKS To Members of the PBSD Board: We are writing to let you know that we are very much against the widening of the sidewalks on Pelican Bay Blvd. The sidewalks are currently a safe place to walk or stroll and have a few slower bike riders pass without any problems. You have proposed a solution in search of a problem. A wide path on one side of the Boulevard will encourage fast bike traffic in both directions on that one path, thus endangering pedestrians and bikers; the latter would be crossing entrances and exits of condo buildings where there is very little visibility when cars and service vehicles go in and out to Pelican Bay Blvd. If we widen the path, this will invite more bikers to use it and go fast, increasing the risk of people being hit by a bicycle, or a vehicle hitting a biker. We are also concerned about the loss of lovely, mature trees and other foliage. These trees give wonderful shade as you walk along the current path and add an enormous amount of beauty to our Community. We have a vested interest in keeping Pelican Bay one of the most desirable communities to live in within southwest Florida. Landscaping with trees and beautiful vegetation are crucial to selling our Community. This proposed project is a waste of money. We have walked the path during all months of the year, and found it very adequate for those who use it. People are polite when passing, and there has never been a problem. Faster bikers prefer the street where they do not have to pass pedestrians. Casual bikers use the berm. We currently have two street lanes in each direction, and vehicles have always easily gone around bikers by using the left lane. The proposed solution would create more problems and would be a significant waste of time and money, plus it would destroy the current ambiance of Pelican Bay Blvd. Very truly yours, Matty & Herb Hasson 7425 Pelican Bay Naples, FI 34108 �r February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 15 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [mailto:Keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:51 AM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Fwd: Pelican Bay Paths Begin forwarded message: From: vbellnpls <vbellnplsPyahoo.com> Date: January 18, 2012 11:02:48 PM EST To: Keith Dallas <Keithdallasl@comcast.net> Subject: Fwd: Pelican Bay Paths FYI. Ronnie Begin forwarded message: From: "Robert 0. Naegele, Jr." <ronir(@naeeelenet.com> Date: January 18, 2012 11:01:49 PM EST To: James Hoppensteadt <Jimh(@pelicanbay.ore> Cc: Robert Uek <rwuek7Ca)email.com >, Ronnie Bellone < vbellnpls yahoo.com> Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Paths FYI From: William McCormick [mailto:billmccormir@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:52 PM To: Robert 0. Naegele, Jr. Subject: Pelican Bay Paths Bob: Sorry for not sending this earlier. As I said to you, I believe the single most important improvement to Pelican Bay Has to be the paths. Currently, they are cracked, uneven, too narrow and not safe for both pedestrian and Bicycle traffic. They are far below the standard of the rest of Pelican Bay. I think the croosswalks were a good improvement and the initial ones were done in the most critical areas. But before doing more crosswalks, I think the paths should be addressed. In addition to the above mentioned deficiencies, they are downright ugly in their current state. As I understand it, the Foundation and the PBSD share responsibility for doing any improvements on the paths. I hope you can use your influence to get this going in both venues..Thanks, Bob. My best, BIII McCormick February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 16 of 22 TM ?M Pon= 81111YONCL fflow NWe4, FL34108 Montenero Board of Directors: 01 -17 -12 The claims of "Heavy" or "Challenged with Traffic" on the pathways are not accurate assessments, in my opinion and I decided to make visual traffic counts periodically to, hopefully, prove or disprove those claims. I took counts in four 30 minute periods, the results of which are shown below. While not very scientific, it gives quantitative support to my contention of there being sparse traffic and no need for the paths to be widened. The counts were made of those persons who passed on the pathway in front of the Montenero on the western side of Pelican Bay Blvd. The counts were made yesterday, Monday, January. 16th, in four 30 minute periods as follows: Time period Pedestrians Bicycles 9:45 to 10:15 AM 17 6 12:10 to 12:40 PM 5 7 - - (5 were a single family group) 10 6 1:30 to 2:00 PM 3:45 to 4:15 PM 4 2 Two hour totals 36 21 Approximately 1 person every 3 1/3 minutes 5 3/4 minutes I think these numbers are clear evidence that no traffic problems exists. We need repairs, upgrading and resurfacing badly, but not widening. r r i i Roy Curbo #1004 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 17 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:45 PM To: Heather Allen Cc: ResnickLisa; Roy Curbow; Robert A. Lauer Subject: Re: Letter from Roy Curbow Heather, Thank you. I am forwarding this to PBSD office so it will be part of our permanent record and will be distributed to our Board with the agenda for our February 1st meeting. Keith On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Heather Allen wrote: Hi Mr. Dallas, Mr. Curbow asked that I forward you that attached letter. He was having trouble sending it to you from his system. Heather Allen Office Assistant Montenero at Pelican Bay 7575 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 239 - 596 -7797 Phone 239 - 596 -7697 Fax From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:38 AM To: Francisnat @aol.com Cc: ResnickLisa Subject: Re: EXTRA WIDTH ON THE SIDE WALKS Mr. Natoli, Thank you for your comments. I will pass them on to the other Board members. The PBSD will be discussing this item at our next meeting, Wednesday February 1st at 1 pm at the Community Center. We welcome public comment. Keith Dallas On Jan 17, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Francisnat(@aol.com wrote: SIR: PLEASE STOP THIS NONSENSE OF WIDEN THE SIDE WALKS OF PELICAN BAY. THANK YOU FRANK NATOLI INTERLACHEN A MEMBER OF P B SINCE 1989 From: Mike Levy [mailto:mikelevy435 @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 10:22 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Fw: Widening the sidewalks From: Phmacdon@aol.com Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 3:32 PM To: mikelevv435@gmail.com Subject: Widening the sidewalks NO III NOM NOM Patricia Macdonald, The Montenero February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 18 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 6:11 PM To: Peter Klein Cc: ResnickLisa Subject: Re: Peter Klein / MONTENERO Unit #1403 Peter, I am forwarding this to Lisa Resnick of the PBSD staff to make sure all Board members see this (they should anyway) and that it is made a permanent part of our record. It will also become an attachment to our February 1st meeting agenda. Tomorrow I will encourage interested persons to write their opinions to either me or Lisa Resnick (LResnick(@colliersov.net) and those would be similarly handled. Thanks for your comments. Keith On Jan 16, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Peter Klein wrote: Folks, This is to inform you my wife (Anne) and I STRONGLY OPPOSE the widening of our pathways /walkways. Suffice it to say that a -mails have BEEN FLYING the past week among Montenero residents /unit owners on this topic and I only hope someone ij the strong has copied one or more of you on them. I sent one 3 days ago to our owners and expressed all the reasons why I oppose this expenditure (a list of strategic planning as well as operational /execution reasons... unfortunately I deleted it and cannot append it here).[ do NOT oppose select maintenance where safety is critical from pathway cracking or drainage - related issues. I do NOT oppose repaving the pathway along its entire length or in select sections. I ONLY OPPOSE widening it at all. Of the 22 e -mails I have received from Montenero residents, 21 were OPPOSED and 1 IN FAVOR ... a range of 'good thinking' reasons were provided and I am sure (hopefully!) you are getting plenty of them on your own. My business is Strategic Planning and helping companies'grow their business' and applaud the various medium -to- longer term Planning efforts here in PB. I am also not someone who oppose'any spending' and have NO ISSUE with spending on the right programs and paying my fair share. Feel free to call me (239- 566 - 9097). Peter (and Anne) Klein www.pkassociates.com Peter(@r)kassoc.com c February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 19 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 2:24 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Fwd: Widening the sidewalk on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd. Lisa, Make sure this is distributed to all Board members. Some have seen it already, but Comcast wouldn't allow all of us to receive it, for some reason. Keith Begin forwarded message: From: Roy Curbow <roycurbow @aol.com> Date: January 9, 2012 2:01:27 PM EST To: keithdallas(@comcast.net Subject: Fwd: Widening the sidewalk on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd. Hi Keith, I sent a copy of my letter earlier but it was returned. I thought there was a "block" on your mail box. Anyway, here is a copy. I sent copies to all 11 board members and 3 were returned —yours and a -mails beginning with "teeup" and "iaizzo ". The exact e-mail with e-mail addresses has been deleted. Thanks also for your note and I look forward to hearing more about the widening project at the board meeting. There may well be more to this story than many of us know about. And I'm aware that the initial phase is $300,000 and the $1,000,000 covers a much wider area of improvements. Regards, Roy - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Carole Curbow <carolecurbow(a)aol.com> To: roycurbow <rovcurbow(d)aol.com> Sent: Mon, Jan 9, 2012 1:26 pm Subject: Fwd: Widening the sidewalk on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Roy Curbow <rovcurbow(@aol.com> To: keithdallas <keithdallas(@comcast.com >; nfn16799 <nfn16799Pnaples.net >; johnchandler219 <"ohnchandler219@Rmail.net>; josiegeoff <josiegeoffPaol.com >; naplessusan <naplessusan(@comcast.net >; djtrecker <ditreckerPyahoo.com >; iaizzo <iaizzo(@comcast.cet >; jbaron <jbaron(a)watersideshops.com >; hunter.hansen < hunter .hansen@waldorfastoria.com> Sent: Mon, Jan 9, 2012 9:39 am Subject: Widening the sidewalk on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd. February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 20 of 22 Board members, Pelican Bay Services Division 01 -09 -12 Good Morning, We wish to express our opposition to your plan to expand the sidewalk width to 8 feet along the western side of Pelican Bay Blvd. The widening is to begin near the Foundation office and proceed to the North Tram Station just past The Montenero, a distance of approximately 1.3 miles. We're also concerned about the number of trees to be removed in the process, which seems excessive. Further evaluation and advice from other than a landscape company seems appropriate. While we have no Landscape expertise, we feel the project could be completed without removing any trees. We have 14 oak trees along our Montenero property line adjacent to the sidewalk and 6 of those are to be removed. The reason given "they were planted too close together ". Says who? They are 24 feet apart and the layout was designed by a landscape architect. Furthermore, the trees look very healthy after more than 10 years. Please leave them! The sidewalk currently ranges from 5 to 6 feet wide and we question the need and the expense to widen it another 2 to 3 feet. We assume you are increasing the sidewalk width for the benefit of bicyclists - -- ? The speed of most bikers should preclude them riding on our sidewalks, most of whom are not Pelican Bay residents. The majority travel at 15 to 20 MPH which is acceptable on the 4 lane road but not on the sidewalk. We think the widening will invite more of these bikers to the sidewalk. Our understanding is the sidewalk speed limit is 10 MPH and pedestrians, of course, have the right of way but this may be ignored and is hard to enforce. Encouraging more bicycles on the sidewalks is not in our overall interest. It clearly increases the safety risks. Pelican Bay residents typically prefer to ride their bikes on the Berm which is a 12 foot pathway and very close -by. The non - residents do not have that option and may well opt for the new 8 foot sidewalk. The bottom line is, widening the sidewalk will likely add to the bike problems and not solve them. This project's cost of $1,100.000 is, in our opinion, a waste of money. Yes, the sidewalks are in need of repair and resurfacing but not widening. We live in the Montenero and have discussed this with many of the residents. We have not found a single supporter of your widening proposal. Not One H We understand PBSD has already received bids on this project -- -This before most residents have even heard of the project. This should not happen. We feel strongly, PBSD should do a better job of making these projects known to residents in detail and encouraging input before decisions are made which impact our community. Our request and hope is that you will delay the widening until the entire community is aware of the plan and has the opportunity to contribute their thoughts to PBSD. We are confident you will find the vast majority are opposed. A delay costs nothing but plunging into the expensive widening changes may well be an irreconcilable mistake. Respectfully, Roy & Carole Curbow 7575 Pelican Bay Blvd. #1004 Naples, Florida 34108 t February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 21 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [ mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 1:05 PM To: ResnickLisa Cc: LukaszKyle; Jim Powers (jim @dmgfl.com); McCaughtryMary Subject: Re: (2) Montenero Residents Opposed to Widening Pathways Noreen got an email from Howard Bedford. I never saw it although she mentioned it was sent. I'll see if I can get copy for our records. I got the email, in hard copy from Roy Curbow. It says it is an email, addressed to our Board and others, so I assumed I would also receive as email. If I don't shortly, I'll ask him to send so it too can become part of our record. Keith On Jan 9, 2012, at 11:26 AM, ResnickLisa wrote: We received two calls this morning from two residents of The Montenero that would like to speak with someone re: their opposition to widenine the pathways project. Roy Curbow (239- 591 -3810 or rovcurbow @aol.com) Mr. Curbow said he wrote a letter and placed in front of Mr. Dallas' door Howard Bedford (239- 593 -4090 \ #703) From: Keith Dallas [maiIto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:09 PM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Fwd: Proposed Tree Removal on Pelican Bay Blvd. Lisa, Please see that the Board has this email for their information. You can also include in agenda package for February. Keith Begin forwarded message: From: Keith Dallas <keithdaIIas(a)com cast. net> Date: January 4, 2012 10:19:22 AM EST To: LukaszKyle <KyleLukaszCa)colliergov.net> Subject: Re: Proposed Tree Removal on Pelican Bay Blvd. Kyle, Thanks for your help. I tried to explain what is going on, but my lack of expertise shows. Keith On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:46 AM, LukaszKyle wrote: Your email outlines the proposed tree conflicts well. I spoke with your property manager and gave him my contact info and he was going to also pass that along to Mrs. Daravingas. I can meet her and go over the proposed modifications at the Montenero. As I recall the trees at the Montenero didn't absolutely have to be removed for the path alignment, it was that the path was going to hug the base of the trees and that the trees were planted so close together. Ellen thought that with the trees now mature and growing into each other it would be a benefit both from a pathway issue and for the canopy of the trees. I'll go over that with her and point the issues out and see if all parties agree. February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Pathways comments from the community Page 22 of 22 From: Keith Dallas [mai Ito: keithdallas(&comcast. net] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:40 PM To: George Daravingas Subject: Proposed Tree Removal on Pelican Bay Blvd. Elaine, Just so everyone is on the same page, I've went through the proposed plans for widening the Pelican Bay Blvd. pathway on the west side from the Commons to the North Tram Station. The trees that are planned to be removed are all on County property and are 13 in total, moving from the south to the north: • 2 sabal palms between the existing pathway and the roadway, just north of the Commons driveway. 1 Oak tree just north of the Sabal palms, also between the pathway and the roadway. • 1 pine tree just south of the Gulf Park Blvd. intersection, on the west side of the pathway. • 3 mahogony trees between the pathway and the roadway, just south of the Sandpiper Parking Lot driveway. • 6 oaks on the west side of the pathway north of the Montenero main driveway, basically in front of the service parking lot. There are currently 12 Oaks and the proposal is to remove every other one to allow the remaining 6 trees more room to grow. In addition the following shrubbery is effected: • Remove existing hedge to the north of pine to be removed, just south of Gulf Park Blvd. intersection. • Remove existing shrubs just south of the 3 magony trees to be removed, just south of Sandpiper Parking Lot driveway. • Remove existing arboricola hedge in 4 locations in front of the Marbella and The Cove. Those are the only trees or shrubs I see impacted. Keith - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Helmut Simon [ mailto:helmut @helmuthedi.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:26 AM To: office @pelicanbayservicesdivision.net Subject: Widening of the path along PB Blvd. I am horrified to read that you plan to widen this path. It is absolutely not necessary because usage is very low. Have you done a survey of how many people use this path at any given time ? I look down on the path from the 21st floor, most of the time it is not used at all. Driving along PB Blvd. I count the number of people using it; the highest I have counted was 12 between my building and the end of the Blvd, and that is at peak time in the morning when people are exercising. Please do a survey and you will come to the conclusion that widening is totally unnecessary. H. Simon St. Laurent To the Pelican Bay Services Division Board We, the undersigned, petition the Board to reconsider the plan to widen the Sidewalks on the West side of Pelican Bay Boulevard from 5' to 8' in order to accommodate walkers and bikers. In addition to negatively impacting the "look" of Pelican Bay Blvd and the destruction of significant numbers of trees, we are more concerned about safety issues. It is the experience of many of us (bikers and non - bikers) that bike riders on the sidewalks are in constant danger because drivers exiting from properties bordering PBB or entering can not adequately see bikers. Several of us who ride regularly have experienced many near misses and believe that getting more bikers on the sidewalks only increases the probability of significant injury. We propose as an alternative reducing the 12' car lanes of PBB to 10' and the addition of a 4' bike lane. We note that Crayton Rd — south of the Naples Grand Hotel — has car lanes of 9'8 ". Also Crayton Rd is even more heavily travelled than PBB. A second alternative would be changing the car lanes to 11' and employ a redesigned gutter run -off on PBB. The run -offs currently are 2' wide. There are gutter designs that are 4' wide and shallow enough to serve as a bike lane. We understand that the lane narrowing plus bike lane was been considered some time back and was rejected. In light of the sidewalk widening proposal, we believe it should be reconsidered again as the safety aspects of the proposals as regards dangers to bikers as well as dangers to walkers with more bike riders on the walks may not have been well considered. Name (printed) Coronado Unit Signature 5 6- 10 11 12 13 ,��ry i(6aq r� aL /U S0 5 A 1,, 2Ra � �G U�'O At-V R2 _dah 15 J- E 6 L� r ,� tv--) 17 - 18 � ,�Kn � - 0 5)u 1p- y 19 1 �c 21 22 ,: 25 26 27 �i" L h l -e,, A-T7 i►�3 29 30 31 32- 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Sb S 6� �U N 8) 5 19. PETITION: After the presentation, we see that the way it is right now is just fine. Please do not disturb the Present pathways. It would be a disturbance of the environment. The signatures below agree they do not want the pathways changed. ,-I_./ i c jam` `Z-04' J. 7225 Pelican Bay Blvd Naales, FL 34108 96 -3989 N 0 01,3 r Neil Dorrill From: Jim Carr [carr @abbinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:03 PM To: Neil Dorrill; KyleLukasz @colliergov.net Subject: RE: 6 or 7 feet pathways? ,'Veil, Going from 8' to 7' width saves the path material - asphalt, limerock and base which is $11,000 for the project. It also could lead to removing fewer trees, maybe a few less at $1,000 each. So the total savings would be approximately $15,000. Jim Carr, P.E. Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 239.597.3111 ext. 215 239.566.2203 fax - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Neil Dorrill [mailto:Neil @dmgfl.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:17 PM To: Jim Carr; KyleLukasz @colliergov.net Subject: RE: 6 or 7 feet pathways? This helps a lot. In a perfect world if a minimum of 10' is required for a "shared use" path we may want to go to smaller but new sidewalk to overcome opposition from abutting neighborhoods who are concerned with the removal of oak trees. Let me know what a revised rough estimate would be if we go to 7'. Thanks Neil - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jim Carr [mailto:carr @abbinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:14 AM To: Neil Dorrill; KyleLukasz @colliergov.net Subject: RE: 6 or 7 feet pathways? Neil, There are two main sources to reference guidelines and definitions for sidewalks and shared use paths: the AASHTO Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities, and the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS). Currently Pelican Bay Blvd has a 5' wide sidewalk (pedestrian path) on both sides of the right -of -way. This is a typical ROW design cross section. A sidewalk is that portion of right -of -way designed for preferential or exclusive use by pedestrians. The minimum sidewalk width is 5 feet, or 6 feet when adjacent to the road back of curb. If we were to design PBB as a new street today, we would be required to provide a 5' minimum sidewalk on both sides, or a 10' wide sidewalk on one side. In either case this would be proposed for pedestrian use. Bicyclists should use the road and follow the traffic laws, although there is nothing to prohibit bicyclists from using the sidewalk. A shared use path is defined as a bikeway physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier. Shared use paths may also be used by pedestrians, skaters, wheelchairs; joggers and other non - motorized users. 1 The minimum width is 10 feet, but 12 foot width is desired. It may be acceptable to decrease the shared use path width to 8 feet, but only when: Bicycle traffic is expected to be low, including peak times, Pedestrian use is not expected to be more than occasional, There is good horizontal and vertical alignment providing safe and frequent passing opportunities, The path will not be subject to maintenance vehicles. Typically, a shared use path is only reduced below 10 feet width when there is very limited right -of -way available, and the reduction typically occurs over a short distance (not the entire length of the path). The subject 5' sidewalk on the west side of PBB is proposed to be widened to a maximum 8' width, as outlined in the Community Improvement Plan (CIP). In my opinion, and by design standards, this is not indented as a shared use path. The CIP stated that residents and guests jog, bike, roller blade and participate in a variety of walking activities, and that these facilities should be widened in order to best serve the wide interests of the residents. The existing 5' sidewalk could be widened to 6' or 7' or to 8' maximum and it is still considered a pedestrian sidewalk. I hope this helps. Please let me know if additional questions. Jim Carr, P.E. Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 239.597.3111 ext. 215 239.566.2203 fax _--original Message---- - From: Neil Dorrill [mailto:Neil @dmgfl.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 10:55 AM To: KyleLukasz @colliergov.net; Jim Carr Subject: FW: 6 or 7 feet pathways? Jim /Kyle: Please research the manual and let me know if a "shared" path (one that includes bicycles and pedestrians) can be 6 feet vs the current 5 that we are living with. Neil - - - -- original Message---- - From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 1:49 PM To: Neil Dorrill Subject: 6 or 7 feet pathways? Neil, Can you nail down more specifics as to our using 6 or 7 feet pathways in lieu of 8 feet by our Thursday meeting? I'd like to see how strongly the "book" states the 8 foot rule, and how much it waffles. Since this is the most important pathway we have in the community, I hate to start off on the wrong foot. However I do wonder how much a 6.5 foot pathway would start to reduce the problem? Do you know of literature discussing this? Keith r O rD D rD Z3 r-F tom' D rD 9J lD 1< n O LA LA O rF O N n < rD ro � N F °1 n m LO Ln 1+ O L _ v Q Q rD • n n rD o 0 p < � D rD o -+. =3 LO CT- rD Q- O Ln rD Ln N rD N' O N _ lQ O � � 7 n (D n � v O Ln rD 3 N LA _ 1• LO W-, O Q CD v n rD 1 1 \ I � \ M \ \ x \ I 1 I v m D Ir I I +/- 4' -0" D � 1 — z m O � CD G 1 i l N O 4 k x i I z / 1 M v m M m � --I p 70 7J X X 77 / / O LA vi 1 -^i 0 0 O 0 -d -d m / A D O O v r) z z �O -0 > D � G) G) :--k� O CO 0 o Z O D z / / �"'�' Mz V) m ;p -n M G1 z I mm* z» Z p �z> ^'O r L") -0 _ CO Z O D-, n Mm D U Z =O :E Po v CO m Dm Z D (A w D m r w • W Ln N 0 -0 --+, o N cQ Q v, C r (D O ED r) _ + Q cc p' 70 � Q O rD O 0O 0 N Q in p rD < rD O +1 • D m rD 3 m v 0 o o = N m r ��.o73 Q r � rD r LO = Ln N O O rD _ v ID v D Q a rD Q 3 (D O v 77 • r n Or 3 CC rD rp n C7 Q 0) v L o *. LA -C-, n rD < : 0 ;^ LO 0- O r, O 9, O N o. N �. Q o C +, rD ,. 0 Q O L^ -0 N• Q to rD La ,g:arD CD v m -v O — ;7- .+ 77- CD 0 LO n O rD a) Q O r+ O 0 o m -- �< rD O LO Q -O 3" m 1-0 zr v Z O Q Pelican Bay Improvement Plan I Phase III ® B I IS I o SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHKI J-I -'. I I I I I g - -- `1 .................. l I I I I II�� mti I I I I I I Ii I► ;I m II I I I I I mA IZS IT I I Z p � w 3 IIN f I II D i by L+ 1 I " y; �I mw 1iV 177 + J71 I 15`� r^►� ,, I j I I I � 1 I � c5$ I II II I I J� I i l D m hti� PY } + a 09 "B r d�I y yr x `fie II U` fT v +1 R.i2 CD I° °m �z m m I ' CD I I m b m fl. NR Do ( z b I o + m S Imm ( ^ 08 Ia Om \SNQW WOJ) 4r.° p 13/U21Q 31b't112Id _gig m. SDI I I a�y�y Z A 2 0 11 y9 A p 3 rn Icy Lf 7.4 37 SO �� 1� I DImj1A rO m mR. 4 I O O L I I Z Z: T a, I l o y A�moD TD I I 2 n� 1-I Ij, O N3_ .1 I TIC... I a I33�3'� a r N�� I f < IE �1 ,y�l aw 6 I I_ < G ' )IL II I i � y x� I I I y 0 w j an I ZeL II � � � n p i I m+ i I I m x m �\I 01- . ¢I'a i m m 1 m� 18 if m m9xm o o 0 0 y I I E oa a �Z 5O Ivl OHO I m. {{ �Im ;O p> m$ M. I p Z I 2j . Si Z Q y i I I y 8 ' A m I I k o N O a n� Z I I I O kz zvm 1( /9'<x r9� I m 'l 3 m ) T m I I l I 1 ( o y p m I L m + �/ f � .v 1 I d O p O �om A 2 �O1 V II yCI I A Z O }{ OD Cry C L�� I I mD� I i1 j p G. INn }} OI C .11_- v N m 91•� I� w fn 2 ^ T C I Z `� oD N �T 59 Ixo .Nm m m I c 1�C o 0. 8 L 1 �� o :a 5 z m m FeL i Nae a'�" I! ° ----- 1-------------------- ��_II J SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEE r . ............ ... J...c __..�.. ---- . - - - - -• a '�axate s SEE SHEET RETL9IR J. PR°.IECT RAI®: m > B -R9 -11 10 PATH CN16NT k IIBST b� a b b ii fl R'� ° H 6 "$• � � ,� cr�RT RARE: $ � e° o N PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY �� o y g ° K WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAYS �R K ° n ,� .. K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION 1y ••� x _ =� a °� W w T e ; m DW.R,° 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 $ $ ' a k SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING. 1T A - - 1 b j SEE SHEET 3 _ .`. .. ......... SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET I 1 I { - - - -- I 50'B I V a Qg l 1d t I I I m I �1% 9 y N m I 01 1 ss .'p I I Lo'B 814 9.04 ds 96.L �r0 w Nam ° 66L 02 ° z am s sa s9 - °m I �+ti 9D i N X ymQ� 3x -P D� Sma I " ym G) op I I A T� I }S O I1 } -o I m 'Lx 4L'L 00'B 89'4 rZ Jb� I I m 0 0 I at 1 1 ZL'L ' ; I I � L6'L i -v `\\' m I I s ,6'L A�I ° � I. 3At 3I�dNad Z I i I�� D I RTo� I � A III s rAm 3N }I LL Lf G 7 I -4 >> X01 I W�A 2.� lO 8a< I Z9x! kbW T I 1>1 9 C 9 N m N O z N S9'11 x lti B* x O II Z ooy m m 60B 8 k S9L ' x o 0 i x 9Z B�4 I N II I b�D 76• 0 6 +� l9 omma 1 zo V , QUA— z I '. "& e I- �✓ I° I �° I ti° I i �z l i i D -Tn it v u y4k Va v� y p a D 411 %JW I II i I I rA� L7 �N` i 9. I� bo �� 9 amoO I I � X. � � N '2 c Z i I 9BL �k 1a� I:N 19 I { LV9 1 I I i 66'B k e °' 1� 4 �U3 n a o m m I �.`........ � SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET gg ,___ -. I- �•••- •_••••- SEE SHEET 5 CLIENT N PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY ryLN1919N: PELICAN BAYx �= ° •..Q .1.9f MR AUG MM6NNS k t! � ,,,�� w 'STSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION O �y' w K NORTH TRAM STATION x .. ➢�"�c PAVING, 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 krJ to o > o SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, NAPLES, FL 34108 s GRADING & DRAIN AGE PLAN (2) to - SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET . ..............i...... i II II I �I I II II I � I I I i I I II II I III I I II I I I I sc a I + I I 1 I I I II �t 1 I II i I I 1 ``IjI I 0x 0k zz6� � 111 < �t 1 II 1 I II 1 I II I I II I I I1 I I I II III LS'$ k �N I1 I I II I I II I II I 1 I 1 H DI r+ o .. w O N � A N (ji e �e J i d I } 83 N l Ixaw � 1 N 'S ' H DI r+ o .. w O N � A N (ji e �e J i d Z li N l Ixaw � 1 � UTA(7D Z ;r 1 A00 lm {yam nN pro 3� C =VIn Nz dO 1 II jj A3o �O�II b m O O � r SEE SHEET I .fs � � W • EJ, Io 0 9b'" //� K •4 % _ 8 £� i � 1T1 D v I m �II o m 4 O v 21 ti `I 'I �I }I I �a x m N� ,ov S 1 �• I ' `11 zl s, 31. I sl jXVW vez w N c :I i 8 e SS r A m GIN 3b~ t 01-1, 26 0 00M� o . N m Z i $ Z po 'Z' N av �� 0 I C W el �m O m Q A, o SEE SHEET ----- T................. I -i - - - -- 66'L qwtl v I �+ I I I II I I II I I� I � I W I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I b9 bo 1; f Z li TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y Ixaw � 1 � ro V 1 t t}l I 1 II 5 t 1 II I I 1 dO 1 II JcA 19SN X O SEE SHEET 0 00M� o . N m Z i $ Z po 'Z' N av �� 0 I C W el �m O m Q A, o SEE SHEET ----- T................. I -i - - - -- 66'L qwtl v I �+ I I I II I I II I I� I � I W I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I b9 bo 1; f aA19 SV— IOHOIN I4l N Z n = L D C m m y Q o "�°°' °" > TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y NAME: PELICAN BAY Q ADNbR PATH ALICwFST ROl! BIOBARIt�R � PELICAN WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION X I dO I �� JcA 19SN X O GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (3 � � W • y 1 0 9b'" //� O°' 71 I I<� k £� i S�8 %L6' I ti 1 I X'. Ism fi ti 1 °nl v� � 0 g •9 ' II II 1 11 ?i I '1 I II 1 Op I II I 1� %Z - - -- I SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET aA19 SV— IOHOIN I4l N Z n = L D C m m y Q o "�°°' °" > TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y NAME: PELICAN BAY Q ADNbR PATH ALICwFST ROl! BIOBARIt�R � PELICAN WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION NORTH TRAM STATION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 I n ¢ � SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING NAPLES, FL 34108 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (3 SEE SHEET 5 SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET .................... .......... �.-------- i- " y....... l l� l I I m I 'f0 ' I I II {� � ) JI 1 SI t1 J ♦� � rn r ray —0 ` ^' 0y q 090+ % m 6 II > Z M\ (n 00+ l p m l l II o � O 0 UR All m- D I I.0 f m0� U1I L 0V 1 I ZAO A�0� l I,yIa A$ mA I m Db ❑ - z I I I 1 I D � Dx 4 y 1 � z c m a > II} I 1 v_ 7I n v _ I I— w I u ! 1 vn�J I p3D00 Ae,� �F I I $II lmz I I w 1 ; 'a + '�•dy i + lI m � '�A m { O Z I I I A ql a— ���� r4 "z5 0 9 3 I I 3AI80 c� 1 I s q +4 >A 31VAINd < l I I .Z1 I I «>a o 1 re� ytiet I I �� Z�e III r, > ig I I i I r A 4 I I 1 I <<m I t [ N mom I I < I II i xs I tI 1 I L t I I I III � I I .1 V `b I I I IW 00 poll II II 4 g F O f 2 Mm 41 Ism III I 1 I I 0 m m I I I III �frgr -- I 1, �4 11 1 ............ ----------------- ± I :...e6.0 . . Ii ... ...... Q � ------------------ �-- ___- _-- _-_____I - SEE CLIENT NAME: �+'t i9 ^. iii.o..• NEp63NN: > �a ° PR�JECf PATHWAY p �a; . m g nun Hlolan»� " � � � N � � � � PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PELICAN BAY �5i14 WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO a, s 2 a ^ C p= a K K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION = I <Z > : m NRAWM TITLE: SUITE 605 ' 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, 0 0w SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 8 I..r GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (4) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET .v -- - - -- -.... E= SHE....... .... ... I � � I P gV I ' I �--�✓ I I 6�a I Ay I I o y66 W A Z 9 Igby f m 4 + I m 4 ', Q� I tom I I i }I I IL i I 1 I�� I 1 1 11 9p A v I> I I I {I • ?J ry I\ g I I i I AH/E�AD AHEAD I I I 3 n m I I I I I I{ Y I B69 A Z I 0 I /[ I I m m 9fZ/l' -o I I Ky alTTii ZZ N I I \g ... } + am a t T c6 a6 W" p= 9 )lMVdJ31`dM) m m 3AIJ4 31`dARId ! mp Nz,2M am I I I a6�1 Vie* ir°n �Tm _� I :2m pmx °le �9 fia V F I !n 66 I � � m ISO I Y o1m0 9 lO I IyA <m m I ybg I I yy �.I i y2m�D s, I I 1 `{ ZE I 1 I I f. Zoe 8 I I: O� No D I S� vCl a Tm °z c"iD' o -� 11 j l m x�n� II � 9 z cry I I I # pN 3n N 6 0r qro i� B8J nm w A n /rmi ti� p pq p 0 cm I ss op, 9D� � m m I I I a II Az- D m. 1d I �6 g46' g Fi y I I 9 } + a V N ILI f Os- t ¢t r s � we v y z EE�l EE a >p Q I I I � ca Cal o m I f ono aQA 4 ° �e :2 II I I Y O sack I I I�i�`6�' I m � D 6 g-- - - - - -' o a. HiF 21 . - -.--I t _ -------- .---- - - - - -- r- - - - - -I I rrI I I - - - .------- - - - - -- - -rz M 17 li' m � -• m o 2a, Naetid t� SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET SEE SHEET 8 qxp a m a NC9b1"N: i� o m e PRO: ECL NAYR: CI.I£NT NAME: �....... �`" ° "' "�T " °" °"�' PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY = a e PELICAN BAY �R ° O y = o — ; V✓ESTSIDE - COMMONS TO en. o z NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION = , I e . e x 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 � 2 s w — SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 a J GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN (5) 8 SEE SHEET 7 SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET ....... . " " " "' QLr------------- - - - - -- 1 I gr14,� I ®- �''s y ( u N I \ V ($ I E I a •s z�x �, e tipr g -z I I I II Il (S3811Md .a dVO) I I > 3/1Jao 3.LVA]bd I III i II �a I I� gym' w r I I ili III`, � O w .i? B ?g 6 it � ❑ Z I I 'o m a.52 in A °� ' m ytim 1 ti I y o` " 1 i 9 .p A Z p yO I �rny j kLt-8 I i '.;I �AOm lo�czi I =o m � I O.H b� ,IIi ms" 0_ }rg r X mX 606 I ONmOD s •Ei y o ,n O f/1 IRI .0 p I ti I N Z-III D I z �ot/INN I I 1 o N o D I W II �m p�eoo WII I I may m5> 30 1 aZ II I i "611 I 64'6 I \ V ( 00'0`x, Z6'6 92-64 9Z'6E$ I i r w AA I �I SY6 O y } 2 v x I I p I a D v 64'6 A I 4 i ono I � I s II r l tI ti vl 81 -6 Q+ I I 91 cl m I a I m I I 51.6/ , I I SZ'64Z'6 i I Yl6 I I. I I I I I I 2z'6 I myl +g 0* 0 + IS -6 �} ' b I ypb� �• 4" 0 „6 t9'6 ` I I QB l° I I I 066£ I I a has 1 I I I I by I I 1 I I I vl. I x I �I n z o ebb I y m •-- •---- ...... _ - i.l._... .6.. _ - -• p ` tb/ G�i'\ y� 0g\I I:0 3 4 biEl Ply\\ Bo/ SEE ISHEET 9 -- - -- -L ---\ --'' - - - -�-' SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET a RE 10N: �m m m v PRDJECf NAPE: CLIENT NAPE: -x 6 §A •iiiiiiii -¢9 -11 ADJUST PAIN AWRNYENS' A IlFST ROI! LING. „N s ' PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY " � y A>R 9I�BAIU�R � e PELICAN BAY K WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION y c ° y A I m PRA me Tnu; 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 O 0�1 - py rn m SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 LA pp GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN {6} - SEE SHEET 8- -� * -- -_- --- - - - - -- °- r------ - - - - -- °I- _mi.ww N a` SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET Jb °•�+ � $51 t o QS �.. I zFiy I oy� w� oA I I �1 m9 Igo i l I I w � II m � I xvw .4 W �� \ �4 nA I 10 S ZO'6869 m $ YM 9 r- 9TH <1 a w� � hF.9 xlp"TI I x� I J p m x I v n 5 T l I wmx I I w II l i A (-aA18 a31aVN3HD) o 3ARla 31VARld xJ-m v (13VHdVN -1S) m s o 009f'S 3A121a 31b�Al�ld m m T\ I h9'6 r� A I m m om mm m of L m D _ -' 2 w OZ9 `g Sc m g w c,: x__� . g 7 � +° I I ��m 8m pNmm I m i �m myN csT I l909 Ib mmx mk w HOV39 cp {/ I 29 I m 0 9L9 j tics 'm l� ti $ I 9mmxl I N � � ss 0 99'9 /m A�NA�m FI'6• . I I c-41 l Z O m P99 i I `N y 0 Y J =omN> x �p II �`SO'8 �' B•Qq O� N o D a p N 99L I1'93 m °��' Wi g° -{� k I a c c�-1 my� I I y ANEAO, fluI I • xvw �, y • III tJ o I le S r m p I" a .b .s 1�TL� 1 I 1N �r ti m ° bolt D •� - y m W I I N I� I> I I I I I g 33 II i U > c � 9Z' 9V v i 2 o m � I o N impN I I I W of Z v I? � i� S aA A I I II z> II II m b I A I $ > II I I � 'o s I zs n m m I� -�� �_ - - - - -- - - - -- -� '--- " - - - -' SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET - - -- SEE SHEET 10 a m a g M �R.E,8 Y9 -6 2e19 0,-oN1: 1 AO9 N ST PATN ALIG a< MJEC N ! IMW N E: g § . ......... MT W Un. PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY PELICAN BAY 1 5, "O- WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO O o K K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION tA H ° A m m D9•� �"� 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 g SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 8 A N �I GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (7) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET - --- - - - - -- SEE SHEET 9 ---- - - - -......... ......................... -- -- , ?- - - - - -• -�I - I r - I I ( I I LCg� I �_ i � � I a 94'6 SSS � �� e I I, kvW f51 I I I �C � i,' �i` + •�+A I 9`6' i 92'g I I I I I I,u.06 W Ism I �Nx 410 w �s I] ;m;li0 I� � I � 9 �w � 16L( +�•Oy 0 Zp N I I I N ymm Qrti m00 m I s ICI .0 t- 13VHdV21 '1S) 3ARl(3 31VAlbd _..... . — ...._..__.__.__... ..... 1 85 �S.3 h m I � •' m I I S} � S a mm ✓ w m la 1 z � <c I I ff 4e ? m - t hhh z 9 m i� II 8 � A iti49P 33 m 6Vy� � 'e m m m �cm D Z A X f s y Cm I I O m O O .� m N s p I y z ]l 0 0 3 S~ m x 4 9 A �b m <m yz p m I x' m wbam -iy Dr m a mm< I O, n a D 0 I A az• ga? x Z O y )I� zNny I 0 \ { O�� 10 toadNOa03 b1 -11A) I b° oo I i > ��I +s 3AING 31tlN?!d -, m I 2 \ m m a A C 'j m D Dn ( .0+ I I L' �% . J 847 ......__ �ZAA % m ~ .. N n � 0 I I: r GI � 4] N Ll 1 � m C m I 3�• Spy I I N p }I 9L8 >=Po3 O Z I A CST I '' }/ /� �4 I?ge0 ft I I I I %Z 64 8• (E I N I I Ii W I I 0 L9 ❑ Im A T om 03 I h W z p m ef•e IyII o�: � e�ai *�, i m �pS� � � 8 � : o °° I 0 El Imo y bl9 Z x I a 4; i phi I I AZO Fi 6 o i ktlW A O rI - z 'o �II zz� p�8 w" S �h mom +iml 2oB a C+h c mNp I I �b D ypm ps I I vD 1 ¢ � II v z A f0•a °y I 11 II If o f I 1\ �'z� B.54 a I C 494 a Z I ` .52 I,� b � II q�+ I 4 m � L06 I II A I II I �I (V1139SVW 1V 3A03 3H1) I Aymn 2CA I Na LZA I I °Sm Cpl �m I 3AR1a 3.LV/MlJd 1 Aye pa�ti mx sm T<m I I ('1 vt �� A I I II. ,�Il��+ VV I J I m v I { 1 94•4 1/ SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET o .... ... .... .... . ......... -. . ..- - _ ®sue -. - - -. .....�..�..~�..I .{... ... SEE SHEET 11 T RETRi16N: o PROJECT NAYS: CLIENT N"E: �tlq: ccaE G2 .. iii.•.iii r m 6 ,; B -Q9 -11 kONST PATH ALICNYENT k 1lFST ROI! LINE. z� m % i 1 s9 I w- :•• �, - AYa aI9HARRTER PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY pELICAN BAY �; r rn c d WESTSIDE COMMONS TO 441 Y y K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION y ° DRA> c Tau; 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 a A C ° GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (8) 8 SEE SHEET 10 -s_�SEE :OP VIEW THIS SHEET r............ ,...x .�n1.. 1. g,,�...... ......... 90 L ex `' " ............. 664 I / Il i ° II m zOm I B['a } m N � tiy4 fps m .wt ti is. 72 I I I � a s III I I •«--_ � v yy I T I I I I II y X I A Z O I I II Z 3 I i it • i I m � z �\•'�46� � I �I 'L0 II I � s I I �• I I ' I 11-�W I ° Z I \a o BBB o II ! IEl I I i > m } I es`B a 6 'i 94'8x 1 t I II I day l I� I� 6.66 I ss'B x m a m II � I III 'I h h 9 I °AZ 909 I I V< AZy I p 8 I I I I II7 � • ��� gmm I I i Zr$.y •Eg �i � I � � 8iD I I I ED •� �itO I m" I ys ` 3AIJQ 31VAR1d I oz I }I TIIns II J w Ll8# I 4 o ° I ti 9 V tiI w 3< 6LY I ,£ I m ti w mT 'B V Or�-m O� z Bl'6x f A L y fi 3Nmim IZ9 . I D N I I 7 I'_� Zow �� � w w I •'° � Iri A_� �� T, a� ANON I m 90/!9 I I D oN�O I 05r I woUA 11D'9 _ + 'A0 �f� -2 I ��o I ice, (til'138�IdW) 3 11C 31VAIbd m I e S o I m y 11 Z I ,I 1 8 0 0 U j ❑ z 1 a •' — . l I# V I f ° I •� 1 c, 01 c, v? > A p 0 a m I l I � m LI�a I i j I 3 W I i W o i Lbgl 0I 0� > I `O y + A iA I I I I I � I V I I � I kVW I 4 I m I I I� I vz I C �In� op I 0. Z 0. I I 99 .�m a° . I e v0vy I ° 1 A20 °°yo i Z AZO I I s 'y 4 I AO I I P o m I S5:• .m o m I amm I � a °fig •�+ �'e �� � I °ypfig I ; I + A A gg> I aN� II I A I a II IF 1 I I I Z I N (• Z I Cn A I I I `o"i ocu n vl I. N j I IaaR Ht SEE SHEET 12 SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET c m a RCYHI9N: >o m PROJECf NA1�: A6cc G �q•ii'•iiii 8 -29 -11 a.N PATH AL[GNIIOiNNl' k REST ROW CLIENT NAME: .-a a AD9 EI96ARR�R N m n PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY a- ••� °"" o o ° K = OVESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAY g Y z x cn K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION Crl CD O J ��� "Oa x 5a 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108_ R� GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (9) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET ..- T I T I }SEE SHEET I'---------------- - -- . - ... ...... -------- - - - -Ij ---- •---- - - - x,, I I I yy 1 s I � Iz'8 mn0v 4y I�oG Iw nb( °w I I rC ° I II I M i NX 0 I TN A I %2 = 00 —0 I I 40'6 1, I I I bL9 yA I I Ill 11 4G 8 W I I � I Zm� I a a � � n N I` I In v I + N L L9'G fl } {{qq N o.o O�y�yZy 3�1m?� I e ©J,g7 �Z' @� \'J •• m O ,9r,� 2 Ll W A N I '�I I B� �'7j 1 m 1p I I 1 1 £a 949 A y m I I I A (OS3N31NOW) 9y A W A p9 0 J. 3AR1(] 31tfN21dZ y o Ta< x� I I� a •�st. I 5 - YL m N N + d . II I pI s I I 4Po ( I I. I I I �Am m T N N I yr 30 I � I 1 >9 I I xvwj I 0 I I a$ >9L t t sre�i e O�m O> O I I ! e.f 1 3q2 y� A o 0 2 (0 Rl I I I I II { II �A�sA "�Zy€ I III III I I 17 Omay ZoNNN II I � p'N = I � Z I I, zg I II I 3 N }I4 � 1 I I I I 's 1 nv I l �I m A0 8 y; I zS— x g O 0 mom I m I 82'B x- d w Z SO'9 m 4! i! 0 m I oO Ok18 �o ti y y 2 An AD I 1 A,8 Gl 41 0 I p � A I im 51 > o AviA � m I 9 I o i; I I = s s > �° J. I m�= I ` o� I I 5 D = r mp o °O° 7I�t n�8 I I I 7J DO OX I I 2 8 y Z W I 5S oa-P I I 1z$ any W I I �� O NAo. I 1 k Zyy Z �yA I I K OHO O y Z 1 N$o> I I xvwl y°� �y g I �c 1 vozg I 1 �m j I Zyxz9 C: O i a 1 rcC o. O CDY m N 109 1 �' pct A N 1i 2 I8 oa N mj Dr A 4i 4.9T 1 X w N D j/. m V I l l a ...... I........... a......l.l - . -....• ..- i -•... ..................... SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET......... SEE SHEET 13 m a RCYbIDN: ,�o a m m e PNDJECT NAId: cm NAME: 8 -Q9 -11 ADJUST PATN ALIGNMENT k TEST -W LINE. Y L 0 �, a ADD 91DDAIDMIX �N m PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY O C :c PELICAN BAY k WESTSIDE — COMMONS TO .� tA NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION DJU�NVC TTt7.6: 9 n yr � m 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 x � GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (10) C/1 N SEE TOP VIEW THIS SEET �e - 1----------- i - - - -- r ___ -� ,r SEE SHEET I2 7 .. ........... o90f I I p N I I 1 f I ~ 0 x I u ]L I m m it I Bfi •L� I �. tP } t I xvw 1 I I ' ps.G �8 I I x 0 x < yy ti rh j������ Cwr-+ Aa I D Tm_ b 4�ni I I r j D> I I Na FmT rA Np mmm Qp4< I L sp" I 9T gg I I I Z SC'G ®` \ I i i i �S9LJ I I" t m ► � , � j� � � eti� I I � 0 I i s I 4 r.. l I $ oy x I Im m /-\ I} t r D oo�� � I %Z Z n� I I I kl 698 � I I I S C j 1 I 71 W II I a y I XL x`& < I I I I ` I I a, LJ MziaN31V ) AINd 16, �J I mII I I I I i 1 m I 0-0 N A(l n O I I I Ij J { O' p o m -i I d m . r I I Im r A >>mCr � Im I I I I ICI I I/ I Ng m� n G Z - °Z =� I I ooNN(F/1 w 1 Nan I l I n � II II I I I9F'8 I 59L f 6y i S 0� m -10 o0. S -nir <m ' I (((m I I� J o n 'WW f GI m C A — I I I %� 1� 0 1✓ t u o III I��4y r $0 IW.�VIIO Dy�� ��p� Ap I a o z ° I I ` n --m f m m y I I II 0 I � =�N D� p I� p m II Z '57 I I r I I I I s7 1 � 8 I I m ?4 V7 ° m Z I II v I i° Z W I . I °moo g c II } x I W zb I I I. to, IG y 9� 7,16 I I m o v I I 'B8 I III °boo °tea- xzI k oP n I I I bZY /zfL Q �'Ieu�P I �I a SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET NCY 29-1 a° �o a m e rm— NAB: m .B -Q9 -ll AoNSf PATH All ! lIEST LINE. ti� CLIENT NAtlE: �, y 6o NIUHARR6R PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY £ ° e •• ENI! -, M -� ° K = WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAYY; u vI f» K z ►� m ro o y° NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION �. o o : m n DWwEVC TfILE:� fF 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 � �,,� GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN (11) g Pathway Report Pelican Bay Foundation January 23, 2012 4-q 1 q?llz r District Offices • pettyi @districtoffces.com: www.districtoffiices.com • 954- 522 -8299 ti Pathway Report Pelican Bay Foundation PUBLIC RECORD RESEARCH µr An example of the reference material included in the records search. The Pelican Bay Foundation had requested the following: i. Find documentation that the pathway along PBB is a multi -use pathway that was not intended to be restricted to just pedestrians? 2. Find when the pathway was first installed? 3. When it was last repaved (in its entirety) from The Commons to at least the North Tram Station? 1. - Multi -Use Pathway We have researched our records and have found several sources delineating the pathways intended use. The question of the pathway has been discussed frequently over the years. The findings referenced include Newspaper articles, WCI Sales Pamphlets, PBID /PBSD Minutes and DRI Annual Monitoring Reports. Material quotes have been culled to provide responses to your request. The excerpt files will be sent to you along with a printed copy of this report separately. r Newspaper References "Winding bicycle and jogging paths meander throughout the community" Naples Daily News - Thursday, Tune q, 1984 "and miles of jogging and biking paths." Naples Now - October, 1982 r ; t "There are bike paths along each roadway, and on both sides of major .'...4 arteries of traffic" The Naples Star -Money -Friday, March 13, 1981 WCI Pamphlet Reference "Both private and community tennis courts, bicycle and jogging paths, parks and nature trails are provided for the outdoor enjoyment of Pelican Bay residents." pn*.d Referelwe Fie "A pedestrian walkway and bicycle pathway system is integrated into the landscaped areas beside the roads throughout the community." "Miles of bicycle and jogging paths wind throughout the community along most major boulevards and residential neighborhoods." 2. - Pathway Installation Date The pathway was built in sections as the development grew. Beginning with the first phase and continuing throughout the project. The DRI Annual Monitoring Reports we have on file state that they were substantially completed by 1995• AM. i 4 1!f •i iw.w L. C'aw..i it it lwwlh� �Z -.it• t *1Li1 i ■tuLStas�•R 1alRYrtretr� c<,.a..:r.r.7t ► ^: irfi4liSlyuir[r t�L -ait�E 11« tlMrr3ilaYf {fir tows rn« N�i�la Matto a. N «tNry Mww Mr :. Mrs ♦t• fit. ±�r *.x OL. f x. t" D. ,.e «ir TKMMMM Brat MIA f aaxkt t iw N.. 2.1. tat hf Vta. 1.1. we Sm 1432 Oft •(A x 3. - Pathway Repavement We were able to find only one reference to the total repavement of the pathways but we have included several references to the partial repavement and the associated process for your use. Lit If sit 34ves ,iMr .r.,1[OK 40""(Aft"r"O **WAN MwYr�[.M�hilNwiit * *#W *no KTA%s tw Me. » **"^" =M aecMpwii "11r lh..+w l�.A ei..W.wN!. r e. "Mr. Archibald stated that hepassed out a copy of the sidewalk inventory. The County typically makes an annual inventory of its road system, as well as an annual inventory ofthesidewalks and bikepaths. The roadways and walkways are rated as to service life. Service life typically means the tuneframe the County needs to respond to undertake improvements Ifthere is aservice life of o -1 that means that within one year the Countyshould be out there resurfacing or repairing. Iftheservice life is 2 years then that indicates exactly what itsays, that within 12 years the County needs to beplannitig certain improvements Thtsgives the County a planning and operational tool which in the current yearshows that there are three sidewalk priorities all of which can befunded There is approximately $2o, 000 in North Naples with which to resurface sidewa&f, and ourgoal is to go ahead an complete thosefirst threeprojects in our current year, which is typically during the winter months " PBSD Minutes - February 1, 1995 PBID invoice/el Missimer b Associates J.N. Environmental Services Technical Purification, Inc. Pilot Freight Carriers Hutchison Tire ieck list presented to the Board of Supervisors: 11ellfield Monitoring - Marsh W/V Analyses - March b tabor wry Supplies 2 Drums Floton Freight Charges For Flown Tires For Fart! Courier f1 330.00 32.65 1.120.00 #67.92 66.14 Eric a. St abeam Ent. Muir bike Path - Dorchester 75.00 (Broken hater Valve) Oisplayrriter System - 012S/84 Thru 6130185 PBID Minutes - May15,1985 " PtLJCM GAx $L*VC .M OWN0 t 90AAD UUMIG ^ago" & na sorMas: rsnaNr U 3 w6 wow -a!t rto row. eay *a.. a. W aaaae A" ag na ate M tM!tMrtea tawr MMa w soh K agar r+w W *ft thvs.aa . ,cwt tytq "" triAAW "Ov tortliMl lwr 040" t� FFay Otte sraa Marta tna cwrsnMPa tr�ot[pMAPOa COMMMON boom "Mr, Turd replied yes, that was a couple of years ago and that resurfacingprogram has all been completed The County was verygood at combig m and doing that work earlier than anticipated Those sidewalks were essentially all resurfaced a couple of Years ago and now we are back into redoing them again. PBSD Minutes September i, ><ggg "Mr, Connell askecZ "Is the contract we had opened to resurface thepathways on Pelican BayBoulevardstill open':" PBSD Minutes August 2, 2oo6 Mpl— Fknda Septtmbea t, :999 LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Pelican Bay MSIBU Advisory Committee mct in Regular Session on this dac at 3:00 P.M. at the Foundation Center, 8264 Hammock Oak [hive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Ur. Alan Varlcy, Chairman ..u. Lou Vlasho, Vice Chairman Mr. Joseph Bawduniak (Absent) Mr. Thomas Brown (Absent) Mr. James Carroll (Absent) Mr. Edward Griffith (Absent) Mr. Glen Harrell (Absent) Mr. Herbert Hasson (Absent) Mr. John Hoyt Mrs. Comelia Kriegh Mm Mamm McCarthy Mr. David Roellig Mr George Watkr ALSO PRESENT: Six (6) Pelican Bay residents; Mr. Ed lischtter, Collier County Public Works Administrator, Mr. Ed Kant, Collier County Transportation Director; Deputy Scat Propper, Collier County Sbcrifrs Office: Mr. Chuck Curry, Managing Online Editor, Naples Daily News; Mr. Todd Turrell, Turrell and Associates; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA Roll Call Approval of the Minutes of the August 4, 1994 Meeting Upcoming Events Ttx Board of C.-* Cottmi —M. Public 11=rMg rot tic Pd.— Bay Sen i)nuruc Fistst Year'M) Budget is x&.h&d F. Stpetm?xr 9, 1999 a 690 P.M. at H..-. xk OA Center Community Policing Update Pelican Bay Wcb Site - (Power Plant Prescma on by Naples Daily Neas) Administrator's Report Capital Projects Street Lighting and Struct Signs Entrance Signs 1 ra kY#84'7Ri5+a^+ewe. n.rta. �w.M r., +�lS#a, ar..a7 4'a�..w�4varwrkyMar sw.. • ir.M 0 MNSn • .e! K7FSr.IRtY. Mk.?. kWuAk tMrwMS * Yoko U-4 0, fto vow ,.* 0 a, a,Msvw %*I"ka. lMF vin lm.-!oJXkar.M kkaw f °aasltb e M kwaiak fardAnk •4 - -. M'Mp klk + kk ilnakMa7Mlpkp�! Ma frsry kasika.n Ua Aarl++skrras tk i NUMkfS ,w +k gri`u � vaa.as e,k w�prruewewa,�r.r+RCSOrak.aa .+r a�m�:+«c+ xws >,w�r ..,� �.a,e.dMa. n.a xk ssaNa#ky�w - �— . � W . "W-00. N--kw "" . war9Mri� M�lkrr �r r +».+ wt.:- wpr. �M.. z�er�kM:yn:,wkassfacer,�w+spho-s Ar wewpgiMpSW+s..srvr «:�k fw�b+Y a�rre�«iaee tkaw *wrgr+ «.w... ear' Ar# rkr. t.+ rkkwshMwntrikr +�++�rs:.ai.�[3�14�wr e+s7Mkww+M*,ra wro aww� +.. wasa.k. .... ►tt.akkaeluklk�tlokiwW*%k+ war .yak Mrwkretusr.a.,,�w R'd®k �tr . a.. .a,*wa..m..�a..»:ww „w.w,ylr«.. ,wwuk.w�++.wra�ma,alrk zw,.�ewfew .akrw.a�Wp ww..A.. r�i.q#x .e4. .. u>. ti�w�Ww4+rra z9r awaa+wk.rsd e�rrma,. �c«r wwekiMgrMk�'ka?N 3. Additionally Mr. Wardstated that as a result oflastmeeting an analysis ofthe bikepath conditions has been prepared This analysis has been done in two differentscenarios with two sub - categories within each. Onescenado would be a repair of the eria&gbikepath with concrete and then to eitherreplace the ezistmg bikepaths or overlay with blacktop and concrete. This analysis includes all bikepadu in Pelican Bayand each has been wheeled offto determine the linealfeet, which is approximately 68,000linealfeetof bikepaths. ” PBSD Minutes December 7,1994 We have included a memo from the County Attorney's office pertaining to the pathways multi- use. U at,IA IA61e - I - U 1h. Mw *A" +; ft~* "im NP# X� AW to tYM L. WV I r" , MA aa.waai.�w "In the unincorporated area of Co llier County, bicyclists may use sidewalks regardless of whether there is a designated bike lane ad,/acent to apublicroadway. Section3t6.2o65(i0) and Section 316 2o65(11), Florida Statutes, govern the use ofsidewalks by bicyclists andprovides that apersonpropelkAg a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk has all the rights and duties applicable to apedestrian, arrepthe/sheshall yield the right of wayto anypedesthan and shallgive an audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian. Collier CountyMemo - April 26, 2007 N This report is intended to reflect the request for information criteria and is not intended to represent a complete synopsis of all records wherein reference to the bike paths, sidewalks or pathways occur. The research was conducted using records currently available to District Offices and was intended to provide a response within a reasonable amount of time. The documents referenced above are part of the public record and have been reproduced to reflect content only. 4a"a C O N T R A C T S t R V 1 C E 5 2000 S. Ocean Drive Suite 1705 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954) 522 -8299 www.districtoffices.com a February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 1 of 4 PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION TO: Board of Directors FROM: Dave Trecker DATE: October 30, 2003 SUBJECT: Berm Ownership Jim Carroll, Chairman of the PBSD, called Heidi Ashton, the county attorney with whom Lisa Barnett has been working in an effort to resolve the berm ownership question. Jim reported that Heidi said unequivocally that the Foundation owns the berm. Jim queried Heidi about the argument put forth by Jim Ward that, because the dyke was built with public funds, the dykelberm is owned by the county.; According to Jim, Heidi said that that had no bearing on berm ownership and that, as far as she was concerned, the Foundation owns the berm. Jim then reportedly contacted Jim Ward, told him of Heidi's position and urged Ward to accept that decision, which is in the best interests of the community. Ward apparently agreed. I feel it is unlikely that we will get any of this in writing. But with the position of a county attorney communicated to a community leader not affiliated with the Foundation, we probably have the next best thing. We owe Jim Carroll a debt of gratitude. I have prepared an article for the PB Post indicating that the Foundation, not the county, owns the berm. ,'CrV J. Trecker Copy: Kyle Kinney EDWARD K. CHEFFY BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY BOARD CERTIFIED BUSINESS LITIGATION ATTORNEY JOHN M. PASSIDOMO BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY GEORGE A. WILSON BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS & ESTATES ATTORNEY F. EDWARD JOHNSON BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS 6 ESTATES ATTORNEY JOHN D. KEHOE'. BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY LOUIS D. D'AGOSTINO BOARD CERTIFIED APPELLATE PRACTICE ATTORNEY JEFF M. NOVATT DAVID A. ZULIAN February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 2 of 4 - CHEFFY PASSIDOMO WILSON & JOHNSON ATTORNEYS AT LAw, LLP 821 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 201 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (239) 261 -9300 FAX: (239) 261 -9782 E -MAIL: CPWJ@napieslaw.com PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TO: Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors FROM: Lisa H. Barnett r RE: Ownership of Foundation Common Areas DATE: . April 9, 2003 KEVIN A. DENTI JEFFREY S. HOFFMAN BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS & ESTATES ATTORNEY LOUIS W. CHEFFY BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY LISA H. BARNETT BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY ANDREW H. REISS WILLIAM J. DEMPSEY STANLEY A. BUNNER, JR. FRANK J. CAMPOAMOR OF COUNSEL: R. SCOTT PRICE You have asked that we review the ownership of the Pelican Bay berm, Oakmont Park, Ridgewood Park and Hammock Oak Park, and determine what rights the Pelican Bay Services District has in said properties, if any. In reaching the following opinions, we relied on ownership and encumbrance searches performed by Attorneys Title Insurance Fund. The legal descriptions searched were provided to us by the Foundation and we did not independently verify the completeness of the legal descriptions. The documents disclosed by the searches were voluminous, and in an effort to provide you with a coherent opinion, the statements of law and fact contained in this memorandum are summary in nature. Upon request, we will gladly provide you with a more detailed analysis. I. Ownership. We reviewed title to the south berm, the north berm, the berm west of St. Lucia, Hamock Oak Park, Ridgewood Park, Oakmont Park (the "Properties ") and the portion of the berm owned by Gulf Bay Land Investments, Inc., and Parcel 7 -1 Development, Inc. (the "Gulf Bay Property "). Title to the Properties was conveyed by several quit claim deeds from WCI Communities (and its predecessors in interest) to the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc., and title to the Properties appears to be vested in the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. The Properties are subject to various easements in favor of the Pelican Bay Services District (formerly the Pelican Bay Improvement District) (the "PBSD "). Although the easements are not all identical, all of the easements specifically provide that a February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 3 of 4 the easements are for drainage purposes. This includes construction and maintenance of drainage facilities. Additionally, all of the easements provide that the Grantee (i.e., PBSD) is responsible for the maintenance of the easements and, in maintaining the easements, will not interfere with the Grantor's right of ingress and egress (or the rights of ingress and egress of its successors and assigns). The easements further provide that if the Grantees or their successors fail to use the easements for the purpose intended, then the Grantee, its successors or assigns, will vacate the easement or relevant portion thereof. Some of the easements specifically provide that they are private easements between Grantors and Grantee and specifically state "neither the general public nor any purchaser of property encumbered by this easement shall acquire any right, title or interest in or to the easement area." Finally, it is worth noting that some of the easements state that the Grantor (i.e., WCI Communities or their predecessors in interest) agrees for itself and its successors and assigns that it will be responsible for any and all repairs, replacements and maintenance or restoration of improvements and landscaping, including sodding over the easement area, except for repairs and replacements required by the grantees activities. As part of our review, we also reviewed the relevant plats. Again, although the dedications in each plat differ, none of the plats contain language which would have the effect of dedicating any of the PBSD drainage easements to the public. In fact, several of the plats specifically provide; "Easements to the Pelican Bay Improvement District shown in the plat are shown merely for informational purposes and are not dedicated hereby... Neither the public nor any purchaser shall acquire any right, title or interest in or to the PBID easement areas by virtue of this plat." Based on the above, it is our opinion that title to the Properties is vested in the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc., subject to the drainage easements in favor of the PBSD, which are private easements and confer no rights on the public. H. Anal. A general principle governing all easements is that the burden upon the servient estate must not be increased to any greater extent than reasonably necessary and contemplated at the time the easement was created. Walters v. McCall, 450 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 1" DCA 1984). Where an easement specifically states the uses or purposes for which it was created, the use of the easement must be strictly confined those purposes and cannot be enlarged by any change in the use or character of the dominant estate. Id. Further, although the courts recognize that, easements carry with them an implied right to do what is necessary for the full enjoyment of the easement, that ri ght is limited and must be exercised in a reasonable manner so as not to injuriously increase the burden on the servient estate. Id. Thus, where, as here, the easements specifically state that they are for drainage purposes and maintenance of drainage facilities, the PBSD does not have right to expand the scope of the easements. Another principle of law governing easements is that an easement is distinct from the right to occupy and enjoy the land itself. It gives no title to the land on which it is imposed and is not a possessory interest. Platt v. Pietras, 382 So.2d 414 (Fla. 5d DCA 1980). Although the PBSD may February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 4 of 4 own the actual utility facilities placed within the easement areas, the PBSD does not have any claim to ownership of the land and cannot claim a possessory interest in the land encumbered by the easements. Also, the easements specifically prohibit the PBSD from interfering with the rights of ingress or egress of Grantor and its successors and assigns. Finally, it is our understanding that the PBSD has taken the position that it is not required to comply with the Declaration and General Protective Covenants for Pelican Bay (the 'Declaration "). Some of the easements in favor of the PBSD were recorded prior to the Declaration (copies of those easements are enclosed). The subsequent recording of the Declaration did not bind the PBSD since the PBSD does not appear to have joined in and consented to the Declaration. However, there are also easements in favor of the PBSD that were recorded subsequent to the Declaration. The Declaration contains covenants that run with the land. This means that any person or entity with any right, title or interest in the land, takes that interest subject to the Declaration once it is recorded. Although there is case law in Florida which provides that a governmental entity which takes title to real property by eminent domain is not subject to restrictive covenants, we were not able to locate case law which exempts a governmental entity with only easement rights from complying with use restrictions governing the use of real property. Based on the above, it is our opinion that the Declaration is binding on the PBSD only with regard to its rights to use the easements that were recorded subsequent to Declaration. However, regardless of whether the PBSD must comply with the Declaration, the PBSD does not have the right to expand the scope of the easements granted and any signage or improvements made by the PBSD that are not reasonably related to the use of the easements for drainage and maintenance purposes would be prohibited without the consent of the Foundation. ; , F. N% pdocs\RETebcanBayFoundazaa\Booazd orD'aectom- benn&Oak=nt.wpd 3 Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Vehicles Due from Property Appraiser Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Accrued Wages Payable Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Operating Fund 109 (Unaudited) Assets 2,410,134.30 27,761.00 $ 2,437,895.30 $ 2,437,895.30 Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 28,990.69 33,701.50 1,292,615.54 1,082,587.57 $ 62,692.19 2,375,203.11 $ 2,437,895.30 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Operating Fund 109 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Operating Revenues: Carryforward Special Assessment - Water Management Admin Special Assessment - Right of Way Beautification Special Assessment Past Due Charges for Services Surplus Property Sales Insurance Payment for Damages Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenace and Repairs IT Direct Capital IT Office Automation /Billing Hr. Indirect Cost Reimbursement Inter Payment /Mnt. Site Ins. Assessment Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage and Freight Rent Buildings and Equipment Insurance - General Printing, Binding and Copying Clerk's Recording Fees Advertising Other Office and Operating Supplies Training and Education Total Water Management Admin Operating Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense Engineering Fees Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. Landscape Materials /Replanting Program Interdepartmental Payment (Water Quality Lab) Plan Review Fees Other Contractural Services Temporary Labor Telephone Trash and Garbage Motor Pool Rental Charge Insurance - General Insurance- Auto Building Repairs & Mntc. Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Tree Triming Clothing and Uniforms $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ 666,300.00 553,029.00 555,424.10 1,907,800.00 1,583,474.00 1,590,176.45 2,603.19 1,500.00 - - Variance 2,395.10 6,702.45 2,603.19 15,300.00 5,098.00 13,532.32 8,434.32 $ 3,713,200.00 $ 3,263,901.00 $ 3,284,036.06 $ 20,135.06 $ 41,400.00 $ 14,300.00 $ 13,396.88 $ 903.12 8,800.00 - - - 400.00 100.00 100.00 - 4, 800.00 1,200.00 1,100.00 100.00 84,500.00 42,300.00 42,250.00 50.00 13,400.00 - - - 26,900.00 9,000.00 6,216.00 2,784.00 3,900.00 1,300.00 705.50 594.50 3,000.00 200.00 107.69 92.31 11,300.00 3,800.00 4,274.00 (474.00) 1,200.00 600.00 600.00 - 2,300.00 200.00 - 200.00 2,000.00 200.00 200.00 2,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 2,000.00 700.00 178.49 521.51 1,100.00 400.00 85.00 315.00 $ 209,000.00 $ 74,500.00 $ 69,013.56 $ 5,486.44 $ 132,800.00 $ 46,000.00 $ 41,861.25 $ 4,138.75 12,000.00 4,000.00 236.25 3,763.75 14,000.00 2,331.33 812.65 1,518.68 8,500.00 2,831.33 - 2,831.33 22,600.00 7,500.00 - 7,500.00 1,500.00 - - - 1,000.00 300.00 286.42 13.58 42,400.00 16,100.00 18,387.00 (2,287.00) 500.00 200.00 108.12 91.88 5,700.00 3,200.00 2,216.87 983.13 100.00 - - - 2, 300.00 1,150.00 1,150.00 900.00 450.00 450.00 1,700.00 - - - 5,400.00 1,800.00 514.79 1,285.21 8,900.00 3,000.00 888.51 2,111.49 30,000.00 10,000.00 7,488.00 2,512.00 1,100.00 500.00 634.56 (134.56) Page 1 of 3 Personal Safety Equipment Fertilizer and Herbicides Other Repairs and Maintenance Other Operating Supplies and Equipment Total Water Management Field Operating Right of Way Beautification - Operating Payroll Expense Emergency Repairs and Maintenance IT Direct Capital Office Automation Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage Rent Buildings /Equipment /Storage Insurance - General Printing, Binding and Copying Clerk's Recording Legal Advertising Office Supplies General Training and Education Total Right of Way Beautification Operating Right of Way Beautification - Field Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenance and Repairs Flood Control (Water Use & Swale /Berm Mntc.) Pest Control Landscape Incidentals Other Contractural Services Temporary Labor Telephone Electricity Trash and Garbage Rent Equipment Motor Pool Rental Charge Insurance - General Insurance - Auto Building Repairs and Maintenance Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Licenses, Permits, Training Tree Triming Clothing and Uniforms Personal Safety Equipment Fertilizer and Herbicides Landscape Maintenance Mulch /Landscape Materials Pathway Repairs Sprinkler Maintenance Painting Supplies Traffic Signs Minor Operating Equipment Other Operating Supplies Total Right of Way Beautification - Field Operating Total Operating Expenditures 500.00 200.00 491.34 (291.34) 98,400.00 28,400.00 30,073.11 (1,673.11) 1,500.00 500.00 268.75 231.25 2,500.00 2,300.00 2,830.51 (530.51) $ 394,300.00 $ 130,762.67 $ 108,698.13 $ 22,064.54 $ 42,600.00 $ 7,400.00 400.00 14,100.00 34,300.00 3,900.00 3,000.00 12,500.00 500.00 2,600.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 $ 129,300.00 $ $ 807,300.00 $ 3,300.00 89,900.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 29, 500.00 190,100.00 3,200.00 3,400.00 17,000.00 2,500.00 300.00 8,800.00 10,000.00 1,700.00 25,100.00 67,300.00 800.00 63,600.00 9,400.00 3,000.00 62,000.00 46,000.00 53,100.00 6,000.00 30,000.00 800.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 9,000.00 $ 1,556,600.00 $ $ 2,289,200.00 $ Page 2 of 3 14,700.00 $ 13,801.94 $ 898.06 100.00 100.00 - 5,700.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 - 7,723.00 (7,723.00) 1,300.00 705.50 594.50 300.00 (92.28) 392.28 4,200.00 4,617.55 (417.55) 250.00 250.00 - 200.00 - 200.00 200.00 - 200.00 200.00 - 200.00 800.00 285.31 514.69 500.00 85.00 415.00 28,450.00 $ 30,976.02 $ (2,526.02) 279,500.00 $ 32,100.00 1,700.00 800.00 9,800.00 77,400.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 5,200.00 800.00 100.00 4,400.00 5,000.00 600.00 8,400.00 22,400.00 300.00 51,200.00 2,300.00 1,000.00 20,600.00 25,300.00 23,900.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 300.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 592,300.00 $ 826,012.67 $ 255,280.61 28,868.18 800.00 154.58 14, 279.00 77,999.54 681.99 411.21 4,751.48 1,105.48 76.93 4,400.00 5,000.00 9,216.34 10,508.36 49,759.25 2,692.21 644.34 22,342.37 31,326.75 21,987.40 2,017.60 24.68 1,184.13 2,790.90 548,303.33 756,991.04 24,219.39 3,231.82 900.00 645.42 (4,479.00) (599.54) 418.01 688.79 448.52 (305.48) 23.07 600.00 (816.34) 11,891.64 300.00 1,440.75 (392.21) 355.66 (1,742.37) (6,026.75) 1,912.60 2,000.00 7,982.40 275.32 1,000.00 (184.13) 209.10 $ 43,996.67 $ 69,021.63 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations Other Machinery and Equipment General Improvements Total Water Management Field Operations Capital Right of Way Beautification - Field Autos and Trucks Other Machinery and Equipmeny Total Right of Way Beautification - Field Capital Total Capital Expenditures Total Operating Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserves (2 1/2 months for Operations) Reserves for Equipment Reserved for Attrition Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) $ 1,000.00 $ $ - $ $ 1,000.00 $ $ $ $ 102,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 1,000.00 - - $ 103,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 $ 104,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 $ 2,393,200.00 $ 856,612.67 $ 784,752.04 $ 71,860.63 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ - 79,600.00 43,780.00 42,912.01 867.99 73,300.00 40,315.00 38,134.55 2,180.45 538,000.00 540,300.00 540,300.00 - 94,800.00 94,800.00 94,800.00 (31,700.00) (31,700.00) (31,700.00) 129,500.00 - $ 1,320,000.00 $ 1,123,995.00 $ 1,120,946.56 $ 3,048.44 $ 3,713,200.00 $ 1,980,607.67 $ 1,905,698.60 $ 74,909.07 $ - $ 1,283,293.33 $ 1,378,337.46 $ 95,044.13 Page 3 of 3 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Street Lighting Fund 778 (Unaudited) Assets - Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 480,764.10 Interest Receivable - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 480,764.10 Total Assets $ 480,764.10 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable $ - Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd 28.00 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 28.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved 194,157.20 Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 286,578.90 Total Fund Balance 480,736.10 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 480,764.10 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Street Lighting Fund 778 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Operating Revenues: Ca rryfo rwa rd Curent Ad Valorem Tax Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Insurance Claim Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense Indirect Cost Reimbursement Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage and Freight Rent Buildings /Equipment /Storage Insurance - General Office Supplies General Other Office and Operating Supplies Total Street Lighting Admin Operating Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenance & Repairs Other Contractual Services Telephone Electricity Insurance - General Insurance - Auto Building Maintenace & Repairs Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Other Equipment Repairs Personal Safety Equipment Other Operating Supplies Electrical Contractors $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ 436,800.00 358,176.00 356,844.56 $ 15.36 $ 10,366.50 $ 4,500.00 1,485.00 4,217.41 $ 598,900.00 517,261.00 529,043.83 Variance (1,331.44) 15.36 10,366.50 2,732.41 11,782.83 $ 41,400.00 $ 14,300.00 $ 13,396.52 $ 903.48 5,300.00 $ 2,650.00 2,650.00 $ - 26,900.00 $ 8,966.67 6,216.00 $ 2,750.67 3,900.00 $ 1,300.00 540.71 $ 759.29 2,000.00 $ 200.00 107.69 $ 92.31 12,100.00 $ 4,000.00 4,470.80 $ (470.80) 300.00 $ 150.00 150.00 $ - 800.00 $ 300.00 15.36 $ 284.64 1,000.00 $ 300.00 - $ 300.00 93,700.00 32,166.67 27,547.08 4,619.59 62,500.00 21,600.00 19,732.74 1,867.26 9,600.00 - - - 800.00 200.00 - 200.00 400.00 100.00 108.12 (8.12) 44,200.00 11,100.00 8,769.00 2,331.00 800.00 400.00 400.00 - 900.00 450.00 450.00 - 1,700.00 4,300.00 1,100.00 755.02 344.98 1,200.00 300.00 106.80 193.20 200.00 100.00 - 100.00 500.00 100.00 - 100.00 64.40 (64.40) 7,300.00 3,700.00 3,899.00 (199.00) Page 1 of 2 Light Bulb Ballast Total Street Lighting Field Operating Total Field Expenditures Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery /Equipment General Improvements Total Capital Expenditures Total Operating Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserve for Future Construction Reserves (2 1/2 mos. for Operations) Reserves for Equipment Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) 12,400.00 146,800.00 240,500.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 1,312.18 41,650.00 35,597.26 73,816.67 63,144.34 1,187.82 6,052.74 10,672.33 200.00 - 200.00 1,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 241,500.00 74,016.67 63,144.34 10,872.33 13,500.00 7,155.00 7,179.74 (24.74) 8,900.00 4,895.00 - 4,895.00 228,100.00 228,100.00 228,100.00 54,900.00 54,900.00 54,900.00 - 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 - 22,000.00 - - 357,400.00 325,050.00 320,179.74 4,870.26 598,900.00 399,066.67 383,324.08 15,742.59 - 118,194.33 145,719.75 27,525.42 Page 2 of 2 Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd Accrued Wages Payable Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Clam Bay Fund 320 (Unaudited) Assets $ 383,534.06 383,534.06 $ 383,534.06 Liabilities and Fund Balance 3,090.00 303,213.58 77,230.48 3,090.00 380,444.06 $ 383,534.06 Operating Revenues: Carry Forward Special Assessment Special Assessment Past Due Fund 111 Transfer from Tax Collector Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees Other Contractural Services Tree Trimming Other Equipment Repairs Aerial Photography Minor Operating Other Operating Supplies Total Clam Bay Restoration Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees Other Contractual Services Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Clam Bay Fund 320 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ - 127,100.00 108,035.00 105,927.50 (2,107.50) 26.45 Property Appraiser Fees 496.47 496.47 34,000.00 - - - 75.63 939.67 939.67 700.00 400.00 458.57 58.57 $ 451,311.88 $ 397,946.88 $ 397,334.09 $ (612.79) 163,368.75 $ 70,151.60 29,000.00 349.77 7,500.00 588.01 1,000.00 271,958.13 $ 7,253.75 $ 143,000.00 Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ 150,253.75 $ Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 422,211.88 $ Non - Operating Expenditures: 54,500.00 $ 17,657.75 $ 23,400.00 7,488.00 9,700.00 - 87,600.00 $ 25,145.75 $ 100.00 $ - 1,200.00 - 1,300.00 $ - $ 88,900.00 $ 25,145.75 $ 36,842.25 15,912.00 9,700.00 62,454.25 100.00 1,200.00 1,300.00 63,754.25 Tax Collector Fees $ 3,900.00 $ 2,145.00 $ 2,118.55 $ 26.45 Property Appraiser Fees 2,600.00 1,558.00 1,482.37 75.63 Revenue Reserve 6,700.00 - - Reserves (2 1/2 month for Operations) 15,900.00 15,900.00 15,900.00 - Total Non - Operating Expenditures $ 29,100.00 $ 19,603.00 $ 19,500.92 $ 102.08 Totall Expenditures $ 451,311.88 $ 108,503.00 $ 44,646.67 $ 63,856.33 Net Profit /(Loss) $ - $ 289,443.88 $ 352,687.42 $ 63,243.54 Page 1 of 1 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Capital Projects Fund 322 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets $ 2,665,858.34 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Goods Received Inv. Received Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 110,095.49 11,612.58 2,582,848.52 (38,698.25) 2,665,858.34 $ 2,665,858.34 121,708.07 2,544,150.27 $ 2,665,858.34 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Capital Projects Fund 322 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward Transfer from Fund 109 General Foundation Payment for Crosswalks Special Assessment Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Irrigation & Landscaping Engineering Fees Lake Bank Restoration Other Contractural Services Sprinkler System Landscape Materials Licenses and Permits Traffic Signs Electrical Contractors Other Operating Supplies (Pavers) Other Road Materials Total Irrigation & Landscaping Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserve for Contingencies Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures: Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ - 436,500.00 436,500.00 436,500.00 - - - 53,487.00 53,487.00 331,900.00 278,796.00 276,574.45 (2,221.55) 19,500.00 6,435.00 16,297.74 9,862.74 $ 3,341,284.04 $ 3,275,115.04 $ 3,336,243.23 $ 61,128.19 $ 132,154.37 $ 44,051.46 $ 9,387.15 $ 34,664.31 85,000.00 - - - 2,978,637.97 992,879.32 421,457.07 571,422.25 4,164.19 (4,164.19) 43,031.00 (43,031.00) 17,500.00 1,000.00 (1,000.00) 50,000.00 - - - $ 7,004.18 (7,004.18) 39,568.70 39,568.70 38,553.60 1,015.10 21,323.00 - - - $ 3,306,684.04 $ 1,076,499.48 $ 524,597.19 $ 551,902.29 $ 10,300.00 $ 6,180.00 $ 5,531.53 $ 648.47 6,800.00 4,080.00 3,896.51 183.49 17,500.00 - - - $ 34,600.00 $ 10,260.00 $ 9,428.04 $ 831.96 $ 3,341,284.04 $ 1,086,759.48 $ 534,025.23 $ 552,734.25 $ - $ 2,188,355.56 $ 2,802,218.00 $ 613,862.44 Page 1 of 1 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11. Miscellaneous Correspondence (submitted by S. O'Brien) re: Survey Page 1 of 1 From: Susan O "Brien To: ResnickLisa Subject: pathway widening, etc. Date: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:57:44 AM Hi Lisa, I would appreciate your distributing this to the other directors as a one -way communication. I talked with Stephen Birnkrant at Amplitutude Research, Inc. in Boca Raton, FL to get a ballpark cost estimate of a questionnaire on topics of interest to the PBSD, e.g. widening /repairs to pathways; bike lanes on PBB; funding for resurfacing PBB; doing additional crosswalks and landscape upgrades; and lighting upgrades, etc. He said if we have a number of different topics in the questionnaire, then doing a written survey (versus a telephone survey) is needed. With about 6500 units, he would mail 1000 surveys randomly. Cost would range from about $5500 to compile the data gleaned from the questionnaire results to about $8000 which would include a longer narrative of the questionnaire results. The time from the day the Board decided to do the survey until the Board has the survey results would range from about 6 to 8 weeks. If the time to finalize the questions on the survey is limited to about 2 weeks, then the Board could have the questionnaire data in about 6 weeks. I found Amplitude Research via a google search. I realize this company is one of thousands that does questionnaires, but it does give us a starting point with some basic information. Susan O'Brien CLAM BAY MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT MANGROVE MONITORING REPORT BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR: THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION DECEMBER 201 1 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biblogical Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Introduction The Clam Bay estuarine system is a 570 -acre area of sandy beaches, shallow bays, seagrass beds and mangrove forests on the coast of Collier County in southwest Florida. The community of Pelican Bay abuts the northern and eastern edges of the system, while the Seagate and Naples Cay communities abut the southern portion of the system. The Clam Bay estuarine system is an important natural and recreational resource for local residents and visitors. Clam Bay was designated a Natural Resource Protection Area by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County in 1994 (Collier County, 1994) and consists of approximately 420 acres of mangroves and some 115 acres of shallow, open water bays, as well as a 35 acre beachfront parcel (Clam Pass Beach Park). The system consists of three primary bays; Outer Clam Bay (southernmost), Inner Clam Bay (central), and Upper Clam Bay (northernmost), connected by a series of tidal creeks. The entire system receives runoff from adjacent upland and wetland areas. Upper Clam Bay is connected to Inner Clam Bay by a winding narrow creek. Inner Clam Bay is connected to Clam Pass through another narrow creek. Outer Clam Bay is connected to the Gulf of Mexico by a wider creek through Clam Pass. Some water also flows south to Doctor's pass through the culverts under Seagate Drive. Clam Pass is a small, marginally stable inlet that has migrated north and south along the shore over the years. Prior to dredging, average water depths were -2.5' to -1.0' with a width of 30 -50' (Collier County, 1994). The Pass remains the primary source of tidal exchange for the Clam Bay system, but it is restricted by sediment deposits just inside the pass and in the long meandering tidal creeks surrounded by mangrove forests. The smaller embayments located primarily to the north of the pass are not subject to normal tidal exchange except during exceptionally high tides. Tidal range is restricted throughout the Clam Bay system ( Turrell 1995; Tackney 1996). Clam-Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 The system is bounded on the north by Vanderbilt Beach Road, to the south by Seagate Drive, to the east by the Pelican Bay development and to the west by the Gulf of Mexico. Pelican Bay is predominately a residential community of private single - family homes, as well as both high and low -rise condominium units. The community also includes a golf course, common areas with meeting rooms, tennis courts, beach park facilities, emergency services facilities, and commercial areas with shopping and hotels. The 2,104 -acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in 1977 as a partnership between Collier Enterprises and Westinghouse Communities. It was one of the first developments in Florida required to save fragile coastal wetlands and associated ecosystems (Urban Land Institute, 1981). The development of Pelican Bay had a limited impact on the wetlands themselves (approximately 94 acres in total with about 78 of those acres located in the northwestern corner of the property) leaving the mangrove forest intact and preserved around the bays. In 1992 a small area of dead black mangroves was first observed in the northern part of the system. In 1995 a significant area (approximately 50 acres) of dead and dying mangroves was reported ( Turrell, 1996). Following the die -off, restorative dredging was proposed to increase tidal flushing by opening up the pass and widening several tidal creeks within the system. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (permit #0128463- 001 -JC) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (permit #199602789 (IP -CC)), authorized restoration activities in the Clam Bay system, in an effort to restore the mangrove communities that had died off. The restoration activities permitted by state and federal agency permits required a suite of monitoring activities to assess effects of the work efforts. Those permits expired in 2009 however, the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD), in an effort to remain informed of the condition of the system, and vigilant in their protection of it, pursued new permits in order to continue the maintenance of the flushing channels within the forest areas. Permits were granted by DEP (permit #11- 0128463 -005) and ACOE (permit #1996 - 02789) authorizing this activity. Like the previous permits, the new permits require annual monitoring of mangrove and other components within the system. This document presents a summary of the mangrove and seagrass monitoring which has taken place within this past year. Mangrove Monitoring Methodology The mangrove monitoring undertaken this year was a continuation of monitoring which was initiated under the old permits. The eleven existing Turrell, Hall monitoring plots and the eight existing Lewis mangrove plots were observed. The previously established monitoring procedures were conducted. These included documenting the number and species of trees within the plot, as well as their approximate height. Each monitoring plot is a measured l Om x l Om square staked at each corner and marked in the center with a labeled PVC piping. Monitoring activities included enumeration and mapping of living and dead trees with diameters at breast height (DBH) recorded for all living trees with a DBH greater than 2.5cm. Seedlings were identified by species and numbers were estimated by count or percent cover (where high numbers make individual enumeration difficult). In 2003, each measured tree was tagged and identified with a plot specific number to allow for easier tracking of individual trees as well as to allow easier comparisons over time. Any saplings that grow to sufficient size ( >2.5cm DBH) between monitoring events are added to the tree counts and Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 receive tags and numbers as well. Photographs were taken and any additional observations, including standing water, wildlife or signs of stress are noted. Time, tide, and prevailing weather conditions were also noted for each survey. Meandering transects were walked throughout the system to inspect stressed areas or to observe areas of concern related by residents of the community or identified through examination of aerial photographs. These surveys are conducted throughout the year as needed. Observations made during these pedestrian transects are noted in the general biological discussion of this report. A photographic timeline was also initiated this past year. Concerns expressed by residents led to the establishment of photo points on the roofs of two condominium buildings adjacent to the mangrove area. Quarterly photos are taken from fixed positions on the roof of the Montenero and the Grovesnor condominium buildings. Over time, comparisons can be made of the photographs to determine if any additional die -off or gradual changes are occurring. Each year, scale rectified aerial photographs are taken of the Clam Bay System by Aerial Cartographics of America. The aerials are produced at 200 -scale in both color and infrared versions. These annual photos can then used to compare recovery and die -off areas for the annual reports. Mangrove Monitoring Results A summary of the 19 monitoring plots have been included on the following pages. Plot discussions, comparative photographs, and tree compositions have been included on each individual plot page. i.i O 0. a •r 0 0 O s. O Q � bq cd Cv h •r C% h O L y UQOFA U N O .� r~ •� N > v� "C O .� �! c`dd -4-3 cd Cd 7013 O o 4) ~ q p p N15. 4. p. cd O > O+" U U a a > o -d Cd tb� r- S � - .� 0 C's cis bA O cn to 0 0 x" ° O 0 a E U U O E O U Ln O ' ' O LO r r N In n ❑ ■ ❑ O 0 O Lo O O LO co N N saga; anil 10 jagwnN N Y d co V ca � Fn Q m O N _O O N k A � \ 2 / / 2 \ / 2 ` 2 k as _ ./ •/ § m 2 � 0 /\§\ t \ t \� £\ Ggwo c K ') § § In, § ol � ± & 2 -1:1 o \ / § t ) 7 k § o / / § 0 o / o k ( 2 § ƒ C,3 3 ® % (A o o c ) >1 1) � / \ § k § 3 § k � E § /° § LO \ o 6 m � � w a n ■ O $ < \ � 0*4 I f co : 3 < 0) � � $ \ \ & — — m o sa;a|| 10 jogwnN 3 q � q O a a 0 0 O Y. a+ � e an b Q R cC y O L N to UQCFA :y E .. U O E O O U In O ' ' O U 04 A ■ ■ ❑ M M N N O saga; aniI jo aagwnN L Y d U V CO O m a U) a) Q_ O N 0 0 N o c > abi o In 0 Obi`�E~ o b 3 0 a U U U nag 23 0 > `n U O O b ��. vi = w y^ N TJ U +' p ,O O t 3 0 w cts Cd M ~' U'v CL4 y U'D'C N O O 4 p'C a 'o ff &; 4 U O r� U 415, +^ O• r N U o :° U b O O }+ p O U M ti U ou v y v U p p 0 r'' O ¢, ��, O O U 0 "N r. r. =0 -a � w t = _ v, F. •'" > ti v� • .-. ¢� 'C O H .t= O t8 ti r� 2 C S, O Q. :y E .. U O E O O U In O ' ' O U 04 A ■ ■ ❑ M M N N O saga; aniI jo aagwnN L Y d U V CO O m a U) a) Q_ O N 0 0 N O 0. a 0 0 q bA � U H y � � y h u W 0- C1 0 > U o � d � z 0 cd pUq 'b U .d N }0}..� c 0 d b U� �i C O O D Jb N U U } v Cd V U U O p s O b O U $14 .- -- b N U b U¢ } �+ 4r 1•+ �-+ N i O O tv b bA ¢' N O - U U O d4 .� 04 � 0 r. ti � � � � � U O U" —C,3 '. cd U U O v 0 a E E U O E O U U O � ' O CV L6 n ■ ■ o O LO O LO O U) O M N N saaal ani-I 10 aagwnN N L N Y N U V co m Q 12 HE O N O O N a+ i. O G. d bA C O Y O 0 e L". bA cC t3 r� I� bpy CC N C y U W F A Y I W, O a �I. 'o y vi � h 4.4 � iC N Z A-' O N 3 0 0 X, o 0 0 i� o, � p O -55 'C B .t"r � � � •'" � � fir" � 3 .� o y V� cd 3 0 O cd h cd o to CA O N .d � O cn y �1 M c ;$ vi v 1: 4. on u a �i a 6 i 9 o� o a `i o H 4M J.-= o~� a - A R o E L) L) O E O U LO O ' ' O N A ® ■ ❑ O LO O LO O O LO Cl) N N SOGJ; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N r-• U m Fn N d m CL 0 N Q N k A � 2 / / � \ � / / 2 / \ ■ § m A d /\§\ \� a\ ®f68 G7@Q \ § f ° k ] R 3 \ q ƒ k 2 q\ 2 2 0 ) § E § &`§ § #w7_AA q ct \ Ln 7 \0 'n ?3 o Q > k \ / � k 2 e c \ § ® § 0 .§ q) \ 7 7 2 ,§ § ) A k k 2 A « § '- 0 � o n 7 ( C) qA ] cn n o / ƒ § ƒ + d E § /o § LO \ o � � a Lq w a n ■ ■ O [.�. e � 7 � 4 ! to CD I � � E � 2 � ... � cn \ q 2 / E o sa;aII; agwnN 3 q � M i. O a a 0 a 0 0 L a on ro u y h O � N bio UWEFA 0 a E U O E O U U' O ' ' O U� r N N 0 ■ ❑ CO - " O 00 O It N O saga; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N L En U 'V co d m a cn 12 0 N 0 0 N o o 4, crj a c's .� U .' c 'D Q cd i. .� F� W � bOOiD r �, 4. c a0i cl 3 p° c r a b o �+ w> C-13 604 o a� c"d Vim] .�.+ 0 0 Qr '0 0 a E U O E O U U' O ' ' O U� r N N 0 ■ ❑ CO - " O 00 O It N O saga; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N L En U 'V co d m a cn 12 0 N 0 0 N O a 0 0 0 a � �V •Y y rn L. O :o RI N ti o w � U W H A 44 * - N O >., p - �v bA N EL O .� O 4) '� 3 0 > Q+ O bA .b 0 +� H v > .. ti � "C y b 3 -d 3 a) 'b N cc cd ^� = U p vpi 00 I-, `a >, CO > .� ouov000wc p Az, 7� O cd w _O R3 3 Cd O . �, r3 O W O cud, "C O 0 cd O O csa ,b -0 y 0 �j C� U . F" Q" U b O O E " O E O U LO O ' O Lq r N L6 n L i co w o m Q O to O T O O LO M N N saaJ; oniI 10 jogwnN O N 0 0 N O LL a 0 0 O �s E on ca u h b i O d' C� N ti U�F�1 to G) 44: O O O vj >O _ 0 C,3 y rA 0 Ed O � Z O O U N u N 4. p O cd E U L) O E O o v ui o o CV LO A 0 m 13 O >L N CL Y 4) C) Fm c- U) O N N LO O LO O saai; aniI jo aagwnN a O N O O N k k / k 2 / � \ / 2 ` 2 k §� § as }\k- §\ § \ § ( SgwQ ƒ o � to � r. u ± § & § 3 / .) w•2 u 7 § [ ©/ C13 «) \ ° / m ' © ] = R = b 2 q t u .) ƒ �,§ '§ / �.§ & r / c' § o A 2 >1 2 o § En } \ k % § \ \ k § \ & U O 2 — / En v 2 0 A b R o cl ) > § 2 u / cd lu § \ ) ƒ / ƒ p 0 U Ln �. .ƒk k 3 q � q E § /o § / LO o . , 6 U� - w a n ■ ■ ❑ � ± Q i o ( 2 0 % $ m a � 2 � ± 2 2 m Co 2$ 9%\\ k salaII jo agwnN 3 q � q i O a a 0 0 0 en Q C Oq cCpd ci ed � y b+ y to O L � U W H A E C) U O E O U U' O ' ' O Uf r N U� n m ■ O a� >L o Y IL 0 CD Q Cl) i C) LO o o Lo O Cl) N N saaJ; aniI ;o aagwnN O N 0 0 N ° a� ° 00 0 c �O o rA,0 0 �O p 01 ° b oy a" Ed °' � o Q) 0 y' a ° $ .� 04 o 3 ° o r' c ° o -� b ol O � � � � • � 'C � � bA ti � �• �i�y-i �, �• p N V �"� U y �. "o o c c� C ° cd 9 03 o U E C) U O E O U U' O ' ' O Uf r N U� n m ■ O a� >L o Y IL 0 CD Q Cl) i C) LO o o Lo O Cl) N N saaJ; aniI ;o aagwnN O N 0 0 N 0 � : � g *4 k A 7 \ \ 2 / 2 / k / \ 2 � \ � % $f§ m2a / \2\ \Z\ E � f _ k w / 7 � � o 0 2 � ' s � . � i R 2 2 9 \ ° s|■eo1aJJL 2 � \ _ o •2 3 � 2 03 © R / 3 §&� ƒ+ § % cs f / � / ) j'� § � § q o � f _ k w / 7 � � o 0 2 � ' s � . � i R 2 2 9 \ ° s|■eo1aJJL 0 a a a en 0 0 0 c Cd U c h .b 40 ca Z bq CU Cd O Q R N O ice. N U4E-(� i Y i m d CL a� H o N { L p ` c a f0 N O 00 (O 't N O r r r r sle4ol aajl o "" o ° 4. ° o > •y ° o +' ~ > O O O O }}>.. cd — O v U U -0 O cn t4l C H O O U O •.. i Y i m d CL a� H o N { L p ` c a f0 N O 00 (O 't N O r r r r sle4ol aajl Yr O a 0 0 0 � u O d' o ct x O 1z+ E UWF-C1 O O � U 3 a 9) m i C. O > O CD d > M N 0 O ct U (9 m i C. CD d > M 0 O � a � � 7D Q) O� N O O O N r 000 M M M 1e ;01 aaJl k A / � / / / 2 \ / 2 / \ ■ & %2a ƒ /�/ \� �( G¥@o � % a � 3 7 2 � 2 I � E E co 9 \ ° Sleol a j.L %nz _ •g « + _w q � •2 ° � � k j / § j E \ 2 •§ 'c § © � / & > 2 § -0 / % � k � 0 ci3 � � % a � 3 7 2 � 2 I � E E co 9 \ ° Sleol a j.L 0 a a en c 0 c 0 0 lC U � h h y O Q O ca x UWF�C� I I � m m Q � d > LO o O = IL i I N L M N O O SIBIO.L Gail ° 4. o > � > � v O c r kn U p 4-. a m U � I I � m m Q � d > LO o O = IL i I N L M N O O SIBIO.L Gail k & / / ■ k / � \ � \ / 2 � 2 k m 2 Q ƒ \2\ t \ * t \mot\ \ /d\ � f � 3 � I k / 7 0 7 � I � � / \ \ 2 / m o s|■eolaj.L « g � � •/ � k ) . nzj%Q)\ /+ � C) § % V U — ) &� c = = A 7� o « o \ � § « LZ ) � c Ln o ® u ) � � f � 3 � I k / 7 0 7 � I � � / \ \ 2 / m o s|■eolaj.L k � / \ \ 2 / 2 \ k / \ 2 � 2 k [ * § \ {Q �kkm § /§( Sgwo 7 § •� — g 2 / » c . ƒ 0 $ % ° § \ ƒ Q) 3 C) § ƒ 0 0 § U / � o « E ° § ƒ f . Co > _ k ® c £ 7 m � / LO o m o m o m o r o M n q q _ — s|■eo1aj.L iyr O 0. 6J a 0 0 O (C U Cd f� FH Cd O d' O cl x O ice. N U W F-o C� Y U (0 m r o �, v1 C j � C CL O O O O O O O O N O w (o N N r r r sIe;ol Gail -cs °' o���� cr a 0 =s cl -mod >0 ° � ct cl 0 -0 cl c� O W) Q �s U O p O O Q, --Co's U) ., O H E O Y U (0 m r o �, v1 C j � C CL O O O O O O O O N O w (o N N r r r sIe;ol Gail Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Condominium Roof Photos Montenero Roof July 2011 Montenero Roof October 2011 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Grovesnor Roof January 2011 Grovesnor Roof October 2011 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Another issue that arose this year was the presence of a boring beetle attacking stressed trees in the early months of the year. Observations within the system and research into the life habits of many boring beetles led to the conclusion that white mangroves affected by the sustained cold temperatures in December 2010 and January 2011 were most susceptible to the beetle attack. Cold stress reduced the abilities of these trees to fight off the boring activities and many trees succumbed to them. Yellowing leaves, leaf drop, and eventual death of the tree was the result. Efforts were made to identify the beetle but since no adults were collected, it was not possible to identify the culprit down to the species level though it was narrowed down to some type of a flat- headed borer (Metallic beetles). Continued vigilance will be maintained to see if additional infestation occurs in healthy trees instead of just the already stressed ones. Borer damage to stressed tree Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Seagrass Monitoring Methodology Seagrasses are a valuable biotic indicator of environmental health and the PBSD has recognized the value in maintaining viable conditions for seagrass growth. The original permitted dredging design - entailed impacts to seagrasses within the channel between Outer Clam Bay and Clam Pass. Monitoring over the life of the permit was designed to allow documentation of the regeneration or loss of seagrasses within the system and follow the effect of increased tidal flushing on seagrass aerial coverage and density within the potentially affected beds. These monitoring practices have continued in order to further document the overall health of the Clam Bay system. Monitoring methods include examination of aerial photographs and ground truthing by in -water and wading surveys. Accurate estimation of seagrass coverage is primarily hampered by visibility. The type of seagrass and limited visibility make estimation through examination of aerial photographs almost impossible. The most effective survey technique has been diving and wading transects and the most effective time has been at low tides when shallow water and substrate exposure make coverage estimation easier. Best effort was made to overcome the visibility obstacles in those areas that were deeper. Due to the ephemeral nature of the grasses being monitored, the survey methodology has been slightly modified from what was originally permitted in the 1998 permits. It was noted early on that the seagrasses shifted in location from year to year and that fixed quadrats in the same location year after year did not accurately depict seagrass coverage or presence within the Bay. More general observations of the presence of grasses along these transects have been used to locate the grass beds with the quadrat measurements used to quantify coverage within those areas where grasses are found. Grass beds in or adjacent to the transects are then mapped with a handheld GPS unit (Garmin 76c) and transferred to an aerial exhibit. Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Seagrass Results Outer Clam Bay: Transect 1 Transect one was surveyed with a surface supplied air source and snorkeling gear in water depths from 2 to 3 ft. Visibility was approximately 8 -10 inches and was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. Halodule beaudettei (Shoal grass) was found within quadrats 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, of this Transect. The general area of grasses along this tansect remained consistent with last couple of years and has expanded slightly from the original pre- dredging monitoring. Densities of grasses was higher in some areas and lower in others but overall was generally consistent with last years results. In addition to the grasses, oysters (Crassostrea virginica) were also observed along the mangrove fringe line. Oyster clumps (approximately 6 inches by 6 inches), upside- down jellyfish (Cassiopeia xamachana), lightning whelks (Busycon contrarium), fighting conchs (Strombus alatus), shell debris, and red, green and brown algae ( Rhodophyta, Chlorophyta, and Phaeophyta) were also observed along Transects 1. Transect 1 45% 0 0 40% 35% 30% 25% o 25% 20% 20% 15% v 15% a 10% 5% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Shoal Grass (Halodule beaudettei)(formerly H. wrightii) Lightning Whelk (Busycon contrarium) (Transect 1) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Outer Clam Bay: Transect 2 Transect two was also surveyed via snorkeling gear and wading. Water depths ranged from 1 to 3 ft. with visibility approximately 6 -12 inches but like Transect 1 this was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. A small area of Shoal Grass (Halodule beaudettei) was observed along this transect between quadrats 1, 2, and 3. The density of this grass was very sparse (maximum 10% coverage) and was mixed in with some Caulerpa algae. Caulerpa was also observed in other areas along this transect and throughout the system. Transect 2 12% - - - -- _ ..— - — — 10% e 10% 8% U 6% 5% 5% C 4% L d CL 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) O rD D rD Z3 r-F tom' D rD 9J lD 1< n O LA LA O rF O N n < rD ro � N F °1 n m LO Ln 1+ O L _ v Q Q rD • n n rD o 0 p < � D rD o -+. =3 LO CT- rD Q- O Ln rD Ln N rD N' O N _ lQ O � � 7 n (D n � v O Ln rD 3 N LA _ 1• LO W-, O Q CD v n rD 1 1 \ I � \ M \ \ x \ I 1 I v m D Ir I I +/- 4' -0" D � 1 — z m O � CD G 1 i l N O 4 k x i I z / 1 M v m M m � --I p 70 7J X X 77 / / O LA vi 1 -^i 0 0 O 0 -d -d m / A D O O v r) z z �O -0 > D � G) G) :--k� O CO 0 o Z O D z / / �"'�' Mz V) m ;p -n M G1 z I mm* z» Z p �z> ^'O r L") -0 _ CO Z O D-, n Mm D U Z =O :E Po v CO m Dm Z D (A w D m r w • W Ln N 0 -0 --+, o N cQ Q v, C r (D O ED r) _ + Q cc p' 70 � Q O rD O 0O 0 N Q in p rD < rD O +1 • D m rD 3 m v 0 o o = N m r ��.o73 Q r � rD r LO = Ln N O O rD _ v ID v D Q a rD Q 3 (D O v 77 • r n Or 3 CC rD rp n C7 Q 0) v L o *. LA -C-, n rD < : 0 ;^ LO 0- O r, O 9, O N o. N �. Q o C +, rD ,. 0 Q O L^ -0 N• Q to rD La ,g:arD CD v m -v O — ;7- .+ 77- CD 0 LO n O rD a) Q O r+ O 0 o m -- �< rD O LO Q -O 3" m 1-0 zr v Z O Q Pelican Bay Improvement Plan I Phase III ® B I IS I o SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHKI J-I -'. I I I I I g - -- `1 .................. l I I I I II�� mti I I I I I I Ii I► ;I m II I I I I I mA IZS IT I I Z p � w 3 IIN f I II D i by L+ 1 I " y; �I mw 1iV 177 + J71 I 15`� r^►� ,, I j I I I � 1 I � c5$ I II II I I J� I i l D m hti� PY } + a 09 "B r d�I y yr x `fie II U` fT v +1 R.i2 CD I° °m �z m m I ' CD I I m b m fl. NR Do ( z b I o + m S Imm ( ^ 08 Ia Om \SNQW WOJ) 4r.° p 13/U21Q 31b't112Id _gig m. SDI I I a�y�y Z A 2 0 11 y9 A p 3 rn Icy Lf 7.4 37 SO �� 1� I DImj1A rO m mR. 4 I O O L I I Z Z: T a, I l o y A�moD TD I I 2 n� 1-I Ij, O N3_ .1 I TIC... I a I33�3'� a r N�� I f < IE �1 ,y�l aw 6 I I_ < G ' )IL II I i � y x� I I I y 0 w j an I ZeL II � � � n p i I m+ i I I m x m �\I 01- . ¢I'a i m m 1 m� 18 if m m9xm o o 0 0 y I I E oa a �Z 5O Ivl OHO I m. {{ �Im ;O p> m$ M. I p Z I 2j . Si Z Q y i I I y 8 ' A m I I k o N O a n� Z I I I O kz zvm 1( /9'<x r9� I m 'l 3 m ) T m I I l I 1 ( o y p m I L m + �/ f � .v 1 I d O p O �om A 2 �O1 V II yCI I A Z O }{ OD Cry C L�� I I mD� I i1 j p G. INn }} OI C .11_- v N m 91•� I� w fn 2 ^ T C I Z `� oD N �T 59 Ixo .Nm m m I c 1�C o 0. 8 L 1 �� o :a 5 z m m FeL i Nae a'�" I! ° ----- 1-------------------- ��_II J SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEE r . ............ ... J...c __..�.. ---- . - - - - -• a '�axate s SEE SHEET RETL9IR J. PR°.IECT RAI®: m > B -R9 -11 10 PATH CN16NT k IIBST b� a b b ii fl R'� ° H 6 "$• � � ,� cr�RT RARE: $ � e° o N PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY �� o y g ° K WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAYS �R K ° n ,� .. K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION 1y ••� x _ =� a °� W w T e ; m DW.R,° 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 $ $ ' a k SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING. 1T A - - 1 b j SEE SHEET 3 _ .`. .. ......... SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET I 1 I { - - - -- I 50'B I V a Qg l 1d t I I I m I �1% 9 y N m I 01 1 ss .'p I I Lo'B 814 9.04 ds 96.L �r0 w Nam ° 66L 02 ° z am s sa s9 - °m I �+ti 9D i N X ymQ� 3x -P D� Sma I " ym G) op I I A T� I }S O I1 } -o I m 'Lx 4L'L 00'B 89'4 rZ Jb� I I m 0 0 I at 1 1 ZL'L ' ; I I � L6'L i -v `\\' m I I s ,6'L A�I ° � I. 3At 3I�dNad Z I i I�� D I RTo� I � A III s rAm 3N }I LL Lf G 7 I -4 >> X01 I W�A 2.� lO 8a< I Z9x! kbW T I 1>1 9 C 9 N m N O z N S9'11 x lti B* x O II Z ooy m m 60B 8 k S9L ' x o 0 i x 9Z B�4 I N II I b�D 76• 0 6 +� l9 omma 1 zo V , QUA— z I '. "& e I- �✓ I° I �° I ti° I i �z l i i D -Tn it v u y4k Va v� y p a D 411 %JW I II i I I rA� L7 �N` i 9. I� bo �� 9 amoO I I � X. � � N '2 c Z i I 9BL �k 1a� I:N 19 I { LV9 1 I I i 66'B k e °' 1� 4 �U3 n a o m m I �.`........ � SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET gg ,___ -. I- �•••- •_••••- SEE SHEET 5 CLIENT N PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY ryLN1919N: PELICAN BAYx �= ° •..Q .1.9f MR AUG MM6NNS k t! � ,,,�� w 'STSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION O �y' w K NORTH TRAM STATION x .. ➢�"�c PAVING, 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 krJ to o > o SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, NAPLES, FL 34108 s GRADING & DRAIN AGE PLAN (2) to - SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET . ..............i...... i II II I �I I II II I � I I I i I I II II I III I I II I I I I sc a I + I I 1 I I I II �t 1 I II i I I 1 ``IjI I 0x 0k zz6� � 111 < �t 1 II 1 I II 1 I II I I II I I I1 I I I II III LS'$ k �N I1 I I II I I II I II I 1 I 1 H DI r+ o .. w O N � A N (ji e �e J i d I } 83 N l Ixaw � 1 N 'S ' H DI r+ o .. w O N � A N (ji e �e J i d Z li N l Ixaw � 1 � UTA(7D Z ;r 1 A00 lm {yam nN pro 3� C =VIn Nz dO 1 II jj A3o �O�II b m O O � r SEE SHEET I .fs � � W • EJ, Io 0 9b'" //� K •4 % _ 8 £� i � 1T1 D v I m �II o m 4 O v 21 ti `I 'I �I }I I �a x m N� ,ov S 1 �• I ' `11 zl s, 31. I sl jXVW vez w N c :I i 8 e SS r A m GIN 3b~ t 01-1, 26 0 00M� o . N m Z i $ Z po 'Z' N av �� 0 I C W el �m O m Q A, o SEE SHEET ----- T................. I -i - - - -- 66'L qwtl v I �+ I I I II I I II I I� I � I W I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I b9 bo 1; f Z li TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y Ixaw � 1 � ro V 1 t t}l I 1 II 5 t 1 II I I 1 dO 1 II JcA 19SN X O SEE SHEET 0 00M� o . N m Z i $ Z po 'Z' N av �� 0 I C W el �m O m Q A, o SEE SHEET ----- T................. I -i - - - -- 66'L qwtl v I �+ I I I II I I II I I� I � I W I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I b9 bo 1; f aA19 SV— IOHOIN I4l N Z n = L D C m m y Q o "�°°' °" > TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y NAME: PELICAN BAY Q ADNbR PATH ALICwFST ROl! BIOBARIt�R � PELICAN WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION X I dO I �� JcA 19SN X O GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (3 � � W • y 1 0 9b'" //� O°' 71 I I<� k £� i S�8 %L6' I ti 1 I X'. Ism fi ti 1 °nl v� � 0 g •9 ' II II 1 11 ?i I '1 I II 1 Op I II I 1� %Z - - -- I SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET aA19 SV— IOHOIN I4l N Z n = L D C m m y Q o "�°°' °" > TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y NAME: PELICAN BAY Q ADNbR PATH ALICwFST ROl! BIOBARIt�R � PELICAN WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION NORTH TRAM STATION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 I n ¢ � SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING NAPLES, FL 34108 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (3 SEE SHEET 5 SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET .................... .......... �.-------- i- " y....... l l� l I I m I 'f0 ' I I II {� � ) JI 1 SI t1 J ♦� � rn r ray —0 ` ^' 0y q 090+ % m 6 II > Z M\ (n 00+ l p m l l II o � O 0 UR All m- D I I.0 f m0� U1I L 0V 1 I ZAO A�0� l I,yIa A$ mA I m Db ❑ - z I I I 1 I D � Dx 4 y 1 � z c m a > II} I 1 v_ 7I n v _ I I— w I u ! 1 vn�J I p3D00 Ae,� �F I I $II lmz I I w 1 ; 'a + '�•dy i + lI m � '�A m { O Z I I I A ql a— ���� r4 "z5 0 9 3 I I 3AI80 c� 1 I s q +4 >A 31VAINd < l I I .Z1 I I «>a o 1 re� ytiet I I �� Z�e III r, > ig I I i I r A 4 I I 1 I <<m I t [ N mom I I < I II i xs I tI 1 I L t I I I III � I I .1 V `b I I I IW 00 poll II II 4 g F O f 2 Mm 41 Ism III I 1 I I 0 m m I I I III �frgr -- I 1, �4 11 1 ............ ----------------- ± I :...e6.0 . . Ii ... ...... Q � ------------------ �-- ___- _-- _-_____I - SEE CLIENT NAME: �+'t i9 ^. iii.o..• NEp63NN: > �a ° PR�JECf PATHWAY p �a; . m g nun Hlolan»� " � � � N � � � � PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PELICAN BAY �5i14 WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO a, s 2 a ^ C p= a K K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION = I <Z > : m NRAWM TITLE: SUITE 605 ' 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, 0 0w SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 8 I..r GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (4) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET .v -- - - -- -.... E= SHE....... .... ... I � � I P gV I ' I �--�✓ I I 6�a I Ay I I o y66 W A Z 9 Igby f m 4 + I m 4 ', Q� I tom I I i }I I IL i I 1 I�� I 1 1 11 9p A v I> I I I {I • ?J ry I\ g I I i I AH/E�AD AHEAD I I I 3 n m I I I I I I{ Y I B69 A Z I 0 I /[ I I m m 9fZ/l' -o I I Ky alTTii ZZ N I I \g ... } + am a t T c6 a6 W" p= 9 )lMVdJ31`dM) m m 3AIJ4 31`dARId ! mp Nz,2M am I I I a6�1 Vie* ir°n �Tm _� I :2m pmx °le �9 fia V F I !n 66 I � � m ISO I Y o1m0 9 lO I IyA <m m I ybg I I yy �.I i y2m�D s, I I 1 `{ ZE I 1 I I f. Zoe 8 I I: O� No D I S� vCl a Tm °z c"iD' o -� 11 j l m x�n� II � 9 z cry I I I # pN 3n N 6 0r qro i� B8J nm w A n /rmi ti� p pq p 0 cm I ss op, 9D� � m m I I I a II Az- D m. 1d I �6 g46' g Fi y I I 9 } + a V N ILI f Os- t ¢t r s � we v y z EE�l EE a >p Q I I I � ca Cal o m I f ono aQA 4 ° �e :2 II I I Y O sack I I I�i�`6�' I m � D 6 g-- - - - - -' o a. HiF 21 . - -.--I t _ -------- .---- - - - - -- r- - - - - -I I rrI I I - - - .------- - - - - -- - -rz M 17 li' m � -• m o 2a, Naetid t� SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET SEE SHEET 8 qxp a m a NC9b1"N: i� o m e PRO: ECL NAYR: CI.I£NT NAME: �....... �`" ° "' "�T " °" °"�' PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY = a e PELICAN BAY �R ° O y = o — ; V✓ESTSIDE - COMMONS TO en. o z NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION = , I e . e x 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 � 2 s w — SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 a J GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN (5) 8 SEE SHEET 7 SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET ....... . " " " "' QLr------------- - - - - -- 1 I gr14,� I ®- �''s y ( u N I \ V ($ I E I a •s z�x �, e tipr g -z I I I II Il (S3811Md .a dVO) I I > 3/1Jao 3.LVA]bd I III i II �a I I� gym' w r I I ili III`, � O w .i? B ?g 6 it � ❑ Z I I 'o m a.52 in A °� ' m ytim 1 ti I y o` " 1 i 9 .p A Z p yO I �rny j kLt-8 I i '.;I �AOm lo�czi I =o m � I O.H b� ,IIi ms" 0_ }rg r X mX 606 I ONmOD s •Ei y o ,n O f/1 IRI .0 p I ti I N Z-III D I z �ot/INN I I 1 o N o D I W II �m p�eoo WII I I may m5> 30 1 aZ II I i "611 I 64'6 I \ V ( 00'0`x, Z6'6 92-64 9Z'6E$ I i r w AA I �I SY6 O y } 2 v x I I p I a D v 64'6 A I 4 i ono I � I s II r l tI ti vl 81 -6 Q+ I I 91 cl m I a I m I I 51.6/ , I I SZ'64Z'6 i I Yl6 I I. I I I I I I 2z'6 I myl +g 0* 0 + IS -6 �} ' b I ypb� �• 4" 0 „6 t9'6 ` I I QB l° I I I 066£ I I a has 1 I I I I by I I 1 I I I vl. I x I �I n z o ebb I y m •-- •---- ...... _ - i.l._... .6.. _ - -• p ` tb/ G�i'\ y� 0g\I I:0 3 4 biEl Ply\\ Bo/ SEE ISHEET 9 -- - -- -L ---\ --'' - - - -�-' SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET a RE 10N: �m m m v PRDJECf NAPE: CLIENT NAPE: -x 6 §A •iiiiiiii -¢9 -11 ADJUST PAIN AWRNYENS' A IlFST ROI! LING. „N s ' PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY " � y A>R 9I�BAIU�R � e PELICAN BAY K WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION y c ° y A I m PRA me Tnu; 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 O 0�1 - py rn m SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 LA pp GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN {6} - SEE SHEET 8- -� * -- -_- --- - - - - -- °- r------ - - - - -- °I- _mi.ww N a` SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET Jb °•�+ � $51 t o QS �.. I zFiy I oy� w� oA I I �1 m9 Igo i l I I w � II m � I xvw .4 W �� \ �4 nA I 10 S ZO'6869 m $ YM 9 r- 9TH <1 a w� � hF.9 xlp"TI I x� I J p m x I v n 5 T l I wmx I I w II l i A (-aA18 a31aVN3HD) o 3ARla 31VARld xJ-m v (13VHdVN -1S) m s o 009f'S 3A121a 31b�Al�ld m m T\ I h9'6 r� A I m m om mm m of L m D _ -' 2 w OZ9 `g Sc m g w c,: x__� . g 7 � +° I I ��m 8m pNmm I m i �m myN csT I l909 Ib mmx mk w HOV39 cp {/ I 29 I m 0 9L9 j tics 'm l� ti $ I 9mmxl I N � � ss 0 99'9 /m A�NA�m FI'6• . I I c-41 l Z O m P99 i I `N y 0 Y J =omN> x �p II �`SO'8 �' B•Qq O� N o D a p N 99L I1'93 m °��' Wi g° -{� k I a c c�-1 my� I I y ANEAO, fluI I • xvw �, y • III tJ o I le S r m p I" a .b .s 1�TL� 1 I 1N �r ti m ° bolt D •� - y m W I I N I� I> I I I I I g 33 II i U > c � 9Z' 9V v i 2 o m � I o N impN I I I W of Z v I? � i� S aA A I I II z> II II m b I A I $ > II I I � 'o s I zs n m m I� -�� �_ - - - - -- - - - -- -� '--- " - - - -' SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET - - -- SEE SHEET 10 a m a g M �R.E,8 Y9 -6 2e19 0,-oN1: 1 AO9 N ST PATN ALIG a< MJEC N ! IMW N E: g § . ......... MT W Un. PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY PELICAN BAY 1 5, "O- WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO O o K K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION tA H ° A m m D9•� �"� 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 g SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 8 A N �I GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (7) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET - --- - - - - -- SEE SHEET 9 ---- - - - -......... ......................... -- -- , ?- - - - - -• -�I - I r - I I ( I I LCg� I �_ i � � I a 94'6 SSS � �� e I I, kvW f51 I I I �C � i,' �i` + •�+A I 9`6' i 92'g I I I I I I,u.06 W Ism I �Nx 410 w �s I] ;m;li0 I� � I � 9 �w � 16L( +�•Oy 0 Zp N I I I N ymm Qrti m00 m I s ICI .0 t- 13VHdV21 '1S) 3ARl(3 31VAlbd _..... . — ...._..__.__.__... ..... 1 85 �S.3 h m I � •' m I I S} � S a mm ✓ w m la 1 z � <c I I ff 4e ? m - t hhh z 9 m i� II 8 � A iti49P 33 m 6Vy� � 'e m m m �cm D Z A X f s y Cm I I O m O O .� m N s p I y z ]l 0 0 3 S~ m x 4 9 A �b m <m yz p m I x' m wbam -iy Dr m a mm< I O, n a D 0 I A az• ga? x Z O y )I� zNny I 0 \ { O�� 10 toadNOa03 b1 -11A) I b° oo I i > ��I +s 3AING 31tlN?!d -, m I 2 \ m m a A C 'j m D Dn ( .0+ I I L' �% . J 847 ......__ �ZAA % m ~ .. N n � 0 I I: r GI � 4] N Ll 1 � m C m I 3�• Spy I I N p }I 9L8 >=Po3 O Z I A CST I '' }/ /� �4 I?ge0 ft I I I I %Z 64 8• (E I N I I Ii W I I 0 L9 ❑ Im A T om 03 I h W z p m ef•e IyII o�: � e�ai *�, i m �pS� � � 8 � : o °° I 0 El Imo y bl9 Z x I a 4; i phi I I AZO Fi 6 o i ktlW A O rI - z 'o �II zz� p�8 w" S �h mom +iml 2oB a C+h c mNp I I �b D ypm ps I I vD 1 ¢ � II v z A f0•a °y I 11 II If o f I 1\ �'z� B.54 a I C 494 a Z I ` .52 I,� b � II q�+ I 4 m � L06 I II A I II I �I (V1139SVW 1V 3A03 3H1) I Aymn 2CA I Na LZA I I °Sm Cpl �m I 3AR1a 3.LV/MlJd 1 Aye pa�ti mx sm T<m I I ('1 vt �� A I I II. ,�Il��+ VV I J I m v I { 1 94•4 1/ SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET o .... ... .... .... . ......... -. . ..- - _ ®sue -. - - -. .....�..�..~�..I .{... ... SEE SHEET 11 T RETRi16N: o PROJECT NAYS: CLIENT N"E: �tlq: ccaE G2 .. iii.•.iii r m 6 ,; B -Q9 -11 kONST PATH ALICNYENT k 1lFST ROI! LINE. z� m % i 1 s9 I w- :•• �, - AYa aI9HARRTER PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY pELICAN BAY �; r rn c d WESTSIDE COMMONS TO 441 Y y K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION y ° DRA> c Tau; 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 a A C ° GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (8) 8 SEE SHEET 10 -s_�SEE :OP VIEW THIS SHEET r............ ,...x .�n1.. 1. g,,�...... ......... 90 L ex `' " ............. 664 I / Il i ° II m zOm I B['a } m N � tiy4 fps m .wt ti is. 72 I I I � a s III I I •«--_ � v yy I T I I I I II y X I A Z O I I II Z 3 I i it • i I m � z �\•'�46� � I �I 'L0 II I � s I I �• I I ' I 11-�W I ° Z I \a o BBB o II ! IEl I I i > m } I es`B a 6 'i 94'8x 1 t I II I day l I� I� 6.66 I ss'B x m a m II � I III 'I h h 9 I °AZ 909 I I V< AZy I p 8 I I I I II7 � • ��� gmm I I i Zr$.y •Eg �i � I � � 8iD I I I ED •� �itO I m" I ys ` 3AIJQ 31VAR1d I oz I }I TIIns II J w Ll8# I 4 o ° I ti 9 V tiI w 3< 6LY I ,£ I m ti w mT 'B V Or�-m O� z Bl'6x f A L y fi 3Nmim IZ9 . I D N I I 7 I'_� Zow �� � w w I •'° � Iri A_� �� T, a� ANON I m 90/!9 I I D oN�O I 05r I woUA 11D'9 _ + 'A0 �f� -2 I ��o I ice, (til'138�IdW) 3 11C 31VAIbd m I e S o I m y 11 Z I ,I 1 8 0 0 U j ❑ z 1 a •' — . l I# V I f ° I •� 1 c, 01 c, v? > A p 0 a m I l I � m LI�a I i j I 3 W I i W o i Lbgl 0I 0� > I `O y + A iA I I I I I � I V I I � I kVW I 4 I m I I I� I vz I C �In� op I 0. Z 0. I I 99 .�m a° . I e v0vy I ° 1 A20 °°yo i Z AZO I I s 'y 4 I AO I I P o m I S5:• .m o m I amm I � a °fig •�+ �'e �� � I °ypfig I ; I + A A gg> I aN� II I A I a II IF 1 I I I Z I N (• Z I Cn A I I I `o"i ocu n vl I. N j I IaaR Ht SEE SHEET 12 SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET c m a RCYHI9N: >o m PROJECf NA1�: A6cc G �q•ii'•iiii 8 -29 -11 a.N PATH AL[GNIIOiNNl' k REST ROW CLIENT NAME: .-a a AD9 EI96ARR�R N m n PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY a- ••� °"" o o ° K = OVESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAY g Y z x cn K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION Crl CD O J ��� "Oa x 5a 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108_ R� GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (9) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET ..- T I T I }SEE SHEET I'---------------- - -- . - ... ...... -------- - - - -Ij ---- •---- - - - x,, I I I yy 1 s I � Iz'8 mn0v 4y I�oG Iw nb( °w I I rC ° I II I M i NX 0 I TN A I %2 = 00 —0 I I 40'6 1, I I I bL9 yA I I Ill 11 4G 8 W I I � I Zm� I a a � � n N I` I In v I + N L L9'G fl } {{qq N o.o O�y�yZy 3�1m?� I e ©J,g7 �Z' @� \'J •• m O ,9r,� 2 Ll W A N I '�I I B� �'7j 1 m 1p I I 1 1 £a 949 A y m I I I A (OS3N31NOW) 9y A W A p9 0 J. 3AR1(] 31tfN21dZ y o Ta< x� I I� a •�st. I 5 - YL m N N + d . II I pI s I I 4Po ( I I. I I I �Am m T N N I yr 30 I � I 1 >9 I I xvwj I 0 I I a$ >9L t t sre�i e O�m O> O I I ! e.f 1 3q2 y� A o 0 2 (0 Rl I I I I II { II �A�sA "�Zy€ I III III I I 17 Omay ZoNNN II I � p'N = I � Z I I, zg I II I 3 N }I4 � 1 I I I I 's 1 nv I l �I m A0 8 y; I zS— x g O 0 mom I m I 82'B x- d w Z SO'9 m 4! i! 0 m I oO Ok18 �o ti y y 2 An AD I 1 A,8 Gl 41 0 I p � A I im 51 > o AviA � m I 9 I o i; I I = s s > �° J. I m�= I ` o� I I 5 D = r mp o °O° 7I�t n�8 I I I 7J DO OX I I 2 8 y Z W I 5S oa-P I I 1z$ any W I I �� O NAo. I 1 k Zyy Z �yA I I K OHO O y Z 1 N$o> I I xvwl y°� �y g I �c 1 vozg I 1 �m j I Zyxz9 C: O i a 1 rcC o. O CDY m N 109 1 �' pct A N 1i 2 I8 oa N mj Dr A 4i 4.9T 1 X w N D j/. m V I l l a ...... I........... a......l.l - . -....• ..- i -•... ..................... SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET......... SEE SHEET 13 m a RCYbIDN: ,�o a m m e PNDJECT NAId: cm NAME: 8 -Q9 -11 ADJUST PATN ALIGNMENT k TEST -W LINE. Y L 0 �, a ADD 91DDAIDMIX �N m PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY O C :c PELICAN BAY k WESTSIDE — COMMONS TO .� tA NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION DJU�NVC TTt7.6: 9 n yr � m 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 x � GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (10) C/1 N SEE TOP VIEW THIS SEET �e - 1----------- i - - - -- r ___ -� ,r SEE SHEET I2 7 .. ........... o90f I I p N I I 1 f I ~ 0 x I u ]L I m m it I Bfi •L� I �. tP } t I xvw 1 I I ' ps.G �8 I I x 0 x < yy ti rh j������ Cwr-+ Aa I D Tm_ b 4�ni I I r j D> I I Na FmT rA Np mmm Qp4< I L sp" I 9T gg I I I Z SC'G ®` \ I i i i �S9LJ I I" t m ► � , � j� � � eti� I I � 0 I i s I 4 r.. l I $ oy x I Im m /-\ I} t r D oo�� � I %Z Z n� I I I kl 698 � I I I S C j 1 I 71 W II I a y I XL x`& < I I I I ` I I a, LJ MziaN31V ) AINd 16, �J I mII I I I I i 1 m I 0-0 N A(l n O I I I Ij J { O' p o m -i I d m . r I I Im r A >>mCr � Im I I I I ICI I I/ I Ng m� n G Z - °Z =� I I ooNN(F/1 w 1 Nan I l I n � II II I I I9F'8 I 59L f 6y i S 0� m -10 o0. S -nir <m ' I (((m I I� J o n 'WW f GI m C A — I I I %� 1� 0 1✓ t u o III I��4y r $0 IW.�VIIO Dy�� ��p� Ap I a o z ° I I ` n --m f m m y I I II 0 I � =�N D� p I� p m II Z '57 I I r I I I I s7 1 � 8 I I m ?4 V7 ° m Z I II v I i° Z W I . I °moo g c II } x I W zb I I I. to, IG y 9� 7,16 I I m o v I I 'B8 I III °boo °tea- xzI k oP n I I I bZY /zfL Q �'Ieu�P I �I a SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET NCY 29-1 a° �o a m e rm— NAB: m .B -Q9 -ll AoNSf PATH All ! lIEST LINE. ti� CLIENT NAtlE: �, y 6o NIUHARR6R PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY £ ° e •• ENI! -, M -� ° K = WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAYY; u vI f» K z ►� m ro o y° NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION �. o o : m n DWwEVC TfILE:� fF 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 � �,,� GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN (11) g Pathway Report Pelican Bay Foundation January 23, 2012 4-q 1 q?llz r District Offices • pettyi @districtoffces.com: www.districtoffiices.com • 954- 522 -8299 ti Pathway Report Pelican Bay Foundation PUBLIC RECORD RESEARCH µr An example of the reference material included in the records search. The Pelican Bay Foundation had requested the following: i. Find documentation that the pathway along PBB is a multi -use pathway that was not intended to be restricted to just pedestrians? 2. Find when the pathway was first installed? 3. When it was last repaved (in its entirety) from The Commons to at least the North Tram Station? 1. - Multi -Use Pathway We have researched our records and have found several sources delineating the pathways intended use. The question of the pathway has been discussed frequently over the years. The findings referenced include Newspaper articles, WCI Sales Pamphlets, PBID /PBSD Minutes and DRI Annual Monitoring Reports. Material quotes have been culled to provide responses to your request. The excerpt files will be sent to you along with a printed copy of this report separately. r Newspaper References "Winding bicycle and jogging paths meander throughout the community" Naples Daily News - Thursday, Tune q, 1984 "and miles of jogging and biking paths." Naples Now - October, 1982 r ; t "There are bike paths along each roadway, and on both sides of major .'...4 arteries of traffic" The Naples Star -Money -Friday, March 13, 1981 WCI Pamphlet Reference "Both private and community tennis courts, bicycle and jogging paths, parks and nature trails are provided for the outdoor enjoyment of Pelican Bay residents." pn*.d Referelwe Fie "A pedestrian walkway and bicycle pathway system is integrated into the landscaped areas beside the roads throughout the community." "Miles of bicycle and jogging paths wind throughout the community along most major boulevards and residential neighborhoods." 2. - Pathway Installation Date The pathway was built in sections as the development grew. Beginning with the first phase and continuing throughout the project. The DRI Annual Monitoring Reports we have on file state that they were substantially completed by 1995• AM. i 4 1!f •i iw.w L. C'aw..i it it lwwlh� �Z -.it• t *1Li1 i ■tuLStas�•R 1alRYrtretr� c<,.a..:r.r.7t ► ^: irfi4liSlyuir[r t�L -ait�E 11« tlMrr3ilaYf {fir tows rn« N�i�la Matto a. N «tNry Mww Mr :. Mrs ♦t• fit. ±�r *.x OL. f x. t" D. ,.e «ir TKMMMM Brat MIA f aaxkt t iw N.. 2.1. tat hf Vta. 1.1. we Sm 1432 Oft •(A x 3. - Pathway Repavement We were able to find only one reference to the total repavement of the pathways but we have included several references to the partial repavement and the associated process for your use. Lit If sit 34ves ,iMr .r.,1[OK 40""(Aft"r"O **WAN MwYr�[.M�hilNwiit * *#W *no KTA%s tw Me. » **"^" =M aecMpwii "11r lh..+w l�.A ei..W.wN!. r e. "Mr. Archibald stated that hepassed out a copy of the sidewalk inventory. The County typically makes an annual inventory of its road system, as well as an annual inventory ofthesidewalks and bikepaths. The roadways and walkways are rated as to service life. Service life typically means the tuneframe the County needs to respond to undertake improvements Ifthere is aservice life of o -1 that means that within one year the Countyshould be out there resurfacing or repairing. Iftheservice life is 2 years then that indicates exactly what itsays, that within 12 years the County needs to beplannitig certain improvements Thtsgives the County a planning and operational tool which in the current yearshows that there are three sidewalk priorities all of which can befunded There is approximately $2o, 000 in North Naples with which to resurface sidewa&f, and ourgoal is to go ahead an complete thosefirst threeprojects in our current year, which is typically during the winter months " PBSD Minutes - February 1, 1995 PBID invoice/el Missimer b Associates J.N. Environmental Services Technical Purification, Inc. Pilot Freight Carriers Hutchison Tire ieck list presented to the Board of Supervisors: 11ellfield Monitoring - Marsh W/V Analyses - March b tabor wry Supplies 2 Drums Floton Freight Charges For Flown Tires For Fart! Courier f1 330.00 32.65 1.120.00 #67.92 66.14 Eric a. St abeam Ent. Muir bike Path - Dorchester 75.00 (Broken hater Valve) Oisplayrriter System - 012S/84 Thru 6130185 PBID Minutes - May15,1985 " PtLJCM GAx $L*VC .M OWN0 t 90AAD UUMIG ^ago" & na sorMas: rsnaNr U 3 w6 wow -a!t rto row. eay *a.. a. W aaaae A" ag na ate M tM!tMrtea tawr MMa w soh K agar r+w W *ft thvs.aa . ,cwt tytq "" triAAW "Ov tortliMl lwr 040" t� FFay Otte sraa Marta tna cwrsnMPa tr�ot[pMAPOa COMMMON boom "Mr, Turd replied yes, that was a couple of years ago and that resurfacingprogram has all been completed The County was verygood at combig m and doing that work earlier than anticipated Those sidewalks were essentially all resurfaced a couple of Years ago and now we are back into redoing them again. PBSD Minutes September i, ><ggg "Mr, Connell askecZ "Is the contract we had opened to resurface thepathways on Pelican BayBoulevardstill open':" PBSD Minutes August 2, 2oo6 Mpl— Fknda Septtmbea t, :999 LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Pelican Bay MSIBU Advisory Committee mct in Regular Session on this dac at 3:00 P.M. at the Foundation Center, 8264 Hammock Oak [hive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Ur. Alan Varlcy, Chairman ..u. Lou Vlasho, Vice Chairman Mr. Joseph Bawduniak (Absent) Mr. Thomas Brown (Absent) Mr. James Carroll (Absent) Mr. Edward Griffith (Absent) Mr. Glen Harrell (Absent) Mr. Herbert Hasson (Absent) Mr. John Hoyt Mrs. Comelia Kriegh Mm Mamm McCarthy Mr. David Roellig Mr George Watkr ALSO PRESENT: Six (6) Pelican Bay residents; Mr. Ed lischtter, Collier County Public Works Administrator, Mr. Ed Kant, Collier County Transportation Director; Deputy Scat Propper, Collier County Sbcrifrs Office: Mr. Chuck Curry, Managing Online Editor, Naples Daily News; Mr. Todd Turrell, Turrell and Associates; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA Roll Call Approval of the Minutes of the August 4, 1994 Meeting Upcoming Events Ttx Board of C.-* Cottmi —M. Public 11=rMg rot tic Pd.— Bay Sen i)nuruc Fistst Year'M) Budget is x&.h&d F. Stpetm?xr 9, 1999 a 690 P.M. at H..-. xk OA Center Community Policing Update Pelican Bay Wcb Site - (Power Plant Prescma on by Naples Daily Neas) Administrator's Report Capital Projects Street Lighting and Struct Signs Entrance Signs 1 ra kY#84'7Ri5+a^+ewe. n.rta. �w.M r., +�lS#a, ar..a7 4'a�..w�4varwrkyMar sw.. • ir.M 0 MNSn • .e! K7FSr.IRtY. Mk.?. kWuAk tMrwMS * Yoko U-4 0, fto vow ,.* 0 a, a,Msvw %*I"ka. lMF vin lm.-!oJXkar.M kkaw f °aasltb e M kwaiak fardAnk •4 - -. M'Mp klk + kk ilnakMa7Mlpkp�! Ma frsry kasika.n Ua Aarl++skrras tk i NUMkfS ,w +k gri`u � vaa.as e,k w�prruewewa,�r.r+RCSOrak.aa .+r a�m�:+«c+ xws >,w�r ..,� �.a,e.dMa. n.a xk ssaNa#ky�w - �— . � W . "W-00. N--kw "" . war9Mri� M�lkrr �r r +».+ wt.:- wpr. �M.. z�er�kM:yn:,wkassfacer,�w+spho-s Ar wewpgiMpSW+s..srvr «:�k fw�b+Y a�rre�«iaee tkaw *wrgr+ «.w... ear' Ar# rkr. t.+ rkkwshMwntrikr +�++�rs:.ai.�[3�14�wr e+s7Mkww+M*,ra wro aww� +.. wasa.k. .... ►tt.akkaeluklk�tlokiwW*%k+ war .yak Mrwkretusr.a.,,�w R'd®k �tr . a.. .a,*wa..m..�a..»:ww „w.w,ylr«.. ,wwuk.w�++.wra�ma,alrk zw,.�ewfew .akrw.a�Wp ww..A.. r�i.q#x .e4. .. u>. ti�w�Ww4+rra z9r awaa+wk.rsd e�rrma,. �c«r wwekiMgrMk�'ka?N 3. Additionally Mr. Wardstated that as a result oflastmeeting an analysis ofthe bikepath conditions has been prepared This analysis has been done in two differentscenarios with two sub - categories within each. Onescenado would be a repair of the eria&gbikepath with concrete and then to eitherreplace the ezistmg bikepaths or overlay with blacktop and concrete. This analysis includes all bikepadu in Pelican Bayand each has been wheeled offto determine the linealfeet, which is approximately 68,000linealfeetof bikepaths. ” PBSD Minutes December 7,1994 We have included a memo from the County Attorney's office pertaining to the pathways multi- use. U at,IA IA61e - I - U 1h. Mw *A" +; ft~* "im NP# X� AW to tYM L. WV I r" , MA aa.waai.�w "In the unincorporated area of Co llier County, bicyclists may use sidewalks regardless of whether there is a designated bike lane ad,/acent to apublicroadway. Section3t6.2o65(i0) and Section 316 2o65(11), Florida Statutes, govern the use ofsidewalks by bicyclists andprovides that apersonpropelkAg a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk has all the rights and duties applicable to apedestrian, arrepthe/sheshall yield the right of wayto anypedesthan and shallgive an audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian. Collier CountyMemo - April 26, 2007 N This report is intended to reflect the request for information criteria and is not intended to represent a complete synopsis of all records wherein reference to the bike paths, sidewalks or pathways occur. The research was conducted using records currently available to District Offices and was intended to provide a response within a reasonable amount of time. The documents referenced above are part of the public record and have been reproduced to reflect content only. 4a"a C O N T R A C T S t R V 1 C E 5 2000 S. Ocean Drive Suite 1705 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954) 522 -8299 www.districtoffices.com a February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 1 of 4 PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION TO: Board of Directors FROM: Dave Trecker DATE: October 30, 2003 SUBJECT: Berm Ownership Jim Carroll, Chairman of the PBSD, called Heidi Ashton, the county attorney with whom Lisa Barnett has been working in an effort to resolve the berm ownership question. Jim reported that Heidi said unequivocally that the Foundation owns the berm. Jim queried Heidi about the argument put forth by Jim Ward that, because the dyke was built with public funds, the dykelberm is owned by the county.; According to Jim, Heidi said that that had no bearing on berm ownership and that, as far as she was concerned, the Foundation owns the berm. Jim then reportedly contacted Jim Ward, told him of Heidi's position and urged Ward to accept that decision, which is in the best interests of the community. Ward apparently agreed. I feel it is unlikely that we will get any of this in writing. But with the position of a county attorney communicated to a community leader not affiliated with the Foundation, we probably have the next best thing. We owe Jim Carroll a debt of gratitude. I have prepared an article for the PB Post indicating that the Foundation, not the county, owns the berm. ,'CrV J. Trecker Copy: Kyle Kinney EDWARD K. CHEFFY BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY BOARD CERTIFIED BUSINESS LITIGATION ATTORNEY JOHN M. PASSIDOMO BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY GEORGE A. WILSON BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS & ESTATES ATTORNEY F. EDWARD JOHNSON BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS 6 ESTATES ATTORNEY JOHN D. KEHOE'. BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY LOUIS D. D'AGOSTINO BOARD CERTIFIED APPELLATE PRACTICE ATTORNEY JEFF M. NOVATT DAVID A. ZULIAN February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 2 of 4 - CHEFFY PASSIDOMO WILSON & JOHNSON ATTORNEYS AT LAw, LLP 821 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 201 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (239) 261 -9300 FAX: (239) 261 -9782 E -MAIL: CPWJ@napieslaw.com PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TO: Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors FROM: Lisa H. Barnett r RE: Ownership of Foundation Common Areas DATE: . April 9, 2003 KEVIN A. DENTI JEFFREY S. HOFFMAN BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS & ESTATES ATTORNEY LOUIS W. CHEFFY BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY LISA H. BARNETT BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY ANDREW H. REISS WILLIAM J. DEMPSEY STANLEY A. BUNNER, JR. FRANK J. CAMPOAMOR OF COUNSEL: R. SCOTT PRICE You have asked that we review the ownership of the Pelican Bay berm, Oakmont Park, Ridgewood Park and Hammock Oak Park, and determine what rights the Pelican Bay Services District has in said properties, if any. In reaching the following opinions, we relied on ownership and encumbrance searches performed by Attorneys Title Insurance Fund. The legal descriptions searched were provided to us by the Foundation and we did not independently verify the completeness of the legal descriptions. The documents disclosed by the searches were voluminous, and in an effort to provide you with a coherent opinion, the statements of law and fact contained in this memorandum are summary in nature. Upon request, we will gladly provide you with a more detailed analysis. I. Ownership. We reviewed title to the south berm, the north berm, the berm west of St. Lucia, Hamock Oak Park, Ridgewood Park, Oakmont Park (the "Properties ") and the portion of the berm owned by Gulf Bay Land Investments, Inc., and Parcel 7 -1 Development, Inc. (the "Gulf Bay Property "). Title to the Properties was conveyed by several quit claim deeds from WCI Communities (and its predecessors in interest) to the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc., and title to the Properties appears to be vested in the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. The Properties are subject to various easements in favor of the Pelican Bay Services District (formerly the Pelican Bay Improvement District) (the "PBSD "). Although the easements are not all identical, all of the easements specifically provide that a February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 3 of 4 the easements are for drainage purposes. This includes construction and maintenance of drainage facilities. Additionally, all of the easements provide that the Grantee (i.e., PBSD) is responsible for the maintenance of the easements and, in maintaining the easements, will not interfere with the Grantor's right of ingress and egress (or the rights of ingress and egress of its successors and assigns). The easements further provide that if the Grantees or their successors fail to use the easements for the purpose intended, then the Grantee, its successors or assigns, will vacate the easement or relevant portion thereof. Some of the easements specifically provide that they are private easements between Grantors and Grantee and specifically state "neither the general public nor any purchaser of property encumbered by this easement shall acquire any right, title or interest in or to the easement area." Finally, it is worth noting that some of the easements state that the Grantor (i.e., WCI Communities or their predecessors in interest) agrees for itself and its successors and assigns that it will be responsible for any and all repairs, replacements and maintenance or restoration of improvements and landscaping, including sodding over the easement area, except for repairs and replacements required by the grantees activities. As part of our review, we also reviewed the relevant plats. Again, although the dedications in each plat differ, none of the plats contain language which would have the effect of dedicating any of the PBSD drainage easements to the public. In fact, several of the plats specifically provide; "Easements to the Pelican Bay Improvement District shown in the plat are shown merely for informational purposes and are not dedicated hereby... Neither the public nor any purchaser shall acquire any right, title or interest in or to the PBID easement areas by virtue of this plat." Based on the above, it is our opinion that title to the Properties is vested in the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc., subject to the drainage easements in favor of the PBSD, which are private easements and confer no rights on the public. H. Anal. A general principle governing all easements is that the burden upon the servient estate must not be increased to any greater extent than reasonably necessary and contemplated at the time the easement was created. Walters v. McCall, 450 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 1" DCA 1984). Where an easement specifically states the uses or purposes for which it was created, the use of the easement must be strictly confined those purposes and cannot be enlarged by any change in the use or character of the dominant estate. Id. Further, although the courts recognize that, easements carry with them an implied right to do what is necessary for the full enjoyment of the easement, that ri ght is limited and must be exercised in a reasonable manner so as not to injuriously increase the burden on the servient estate. Id. Thus, where, as here, the easements specifically state that they are for drainage purposes and maintenance of drainage facilities, the PBSD does not have right to expand the scope of the easements. Another principle of law governing easements is that an easement is distinct from the right to occupy and enjoy the land itself. It gives no title to the land on which it is imposed and is not a possessory interest. Platt v. Pietras, 382 So.2d 414 (Fla. 5d DCA 1980). Although the PBSD may February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 4 of 4 own the actual utility facilities placed within the easement areas, the PBSD does not have any claim to ownership of the land and cannot claim a possessory interest in the land encumbered by the easements. Also, the easements specifically prohibit the PBSD from interfering with the rights of ingress or egress of Grantor and its successors and assigns. Finally, it is our understanding that the PBSD has taken the position that it is not required to comply with the Declaration and General Protective Covenants for Pelican Bay (the 'Declaration "). Some of the easements in favor of the PBSD were recorded prior to the Declaration (copies of those easements are enclosed). The subsequent recording of the Declaration did not bind the PBSD since the PBSD does not appear to have joined in and consented to the Declaration. However, there are also easements in favor of the PBSD that were recorded subsequent to the Declaration. The Declaration contains covenants that run with the land. This means that any person or entity with any right, title or interest in the land, takes that interest subject to the Declaration once it is recorded. Although there is case law in Florida which provides that a governmental entity which takes title to real property by eminent domain is not subject to restrictive covenants, we were not able to locate case law which exempts a governmental entity with only easement rights from complying with use restrictions governing the use of real property. Based on the above, it is our opinion that the Declaration is binding on the PBSD only with regard to its rights to use the easements that were recorded subsequent to Declaration. However, regardless of whether the PBSD must comply with the Declaration, the PBSD does not have the right to expand the scope of the easements granted and any signage or improvements made by the PBSD that are not reasonably related to the use of the easements for drainage and maintenance purposes would be prohibited without the consent of the Foundation. ; , F. N% pdocs\RETebcanBayFoundazaa\Booazd orD'aectom- benn&Oak=nt.wpd 3 Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Vehicles Due from Property Appraiser Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Accrued Wages Payable Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Operating Fund 109 (Unaudited) Assets 2,410,134.30 27,761.00 $ 2,437,895.30 $ 2,437,895.30 Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 28,990.69 33,701.50 1,292,615.54 1,082,587.57 $ 62,692.19 2,375,203.11 $ 2,437,895.30 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Operating Fund 109 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Operating Revenues: Carryforward Special Assessment - Water Management Admin Special Assessment - Right of Way Beautification Special Assessment Past Due Charges for Services Surplus Property Sales Insurance Payment for Damages Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenace and Repairs IT Direct Capital IT Office Automation /Billing Hr. Indirect Cost Reimbursement Inter Payment /Mnt. Site Ins. Assessment Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage and Freight Rent Buildings and Equipment Insurance - General Printing, Binding and Copying Clerk's Recording Fees Advertising Other Office and Operating Supplies Training and Education Total Water Management Admin Operating Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense Engineering Fees Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. Landscape Materials /Replanting Program Interdepartmental Payment (Water Quality Lab) Plan Review Fees Other Contractural Services Temporary Labor Telephone Trash and Garbage Motor Pool Rental Charge Insurance - General Insurance- Auto Building Repairs & Mntc. Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Tree Triming Clothing and Uniforms $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ 666,300.00 553,029.00 555,424.10 1,907,800.00 1,583,474.00 1,590,176.45 2,603.19 1,500.00 - - Variance 2,395.10 6,702.45 2,603.19 15,300.00 5,098.00 13,532.32 8,434.32 $ 3,713,200.00 $ 3,263,901.00 $ 3,284,036.06 $ 20,135.06 $ 41,400.00 $ 14,300.00 $ 13,396.88 $ 903.12 8,800.00 - - - 400.00 100.00 100.00 - 4, 800.00 1,200.00 1,100.00 100.00 84,500.00 42,300.00 42,250.00 50.00 13,400.00 - - - 26,900.00 9,000.00 6,216.00 2,784.00 3,900.00 1,300.00 705.50 594.50 3,000.00 200.00 107.69 92.31 11,300.00 3,800.00 4,274.00 (474.00) 1,200.00 600.00 600.00 - 2,300.00 200.00 - 200.00 2,000.00 200.00 200.00 2,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 2,000.00 700.00 178.49 521.51 1,100.00 400.00 85.00 315.00 $ 209,000.00 $ 74,500.00 $ 69,013.56 $ 5,486.44 $ 132,800.00 $ 46,000.00 $ 41,861.25 $ 4,138.75 12,000.00 4,000.00 236.25 3,763.75 14,000.00 2,331.33 812.65 1,518.68 8,500.00 2,831.33 - 2,831.33 22,600.00 7,500.00 - 7,500.00 1,500.00 - - - 1,000.00 300.00 286.42 13.58 42,400.00 16,100.00 18,387.00 (2,287.00) 500.00 200.00 108.12 91.88 5,700.00 3,200.00 2,216.87 983.13 100.00 - - - 2, 300.00 1,150.00 1,150.00 900.00 450.00 450.00 1,700.00 - - - 5,400.00 1,800.00 514.79 1,285.21 8,900.00 3,000.00 888.51 2,111.49 30,000.00 10,000.00 7,488.00 2,512.00 1,100.00 500.00 634.56 (134.56) Page 1 of 3 Personal Safety Equipment Fertilizer and Herbicides Other Repairs and Maintenance Other Operating Supplies and Equipment Total Water Management Field Operating Right of Way Beautification - Operating Payroll Expense Emergency Repairs and Maintenance IT Direct Capital Office Automation Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage Rent Buildings /Equipment /Storage Insurance - General Printing, Binding and Copying Clerk's Recording Legal Advertising Office Supplies General Training and Education Total Right of Way Beautification Operating Right of Way Beautification - Field Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenance and Repairs Flood Control (Water Use & Swale /Berm Mntc.) Pest Control Landscape Incidentals Other Contractural Services Temporary Labor Telephone Electricity Trash and Garbage Rent Equipment Motor Pool Rental Charge Insurance - General Insurance - Auto Building Repairs and Maintenance Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Licenses, Permits, Training Tree Triming Clothing and Uniforms Personal Safety Equipment Fertilizer and Herbicides Landscape Maintenance Mulch /Landscape Materials Pathway Repairs Sprinkler Maintenance Painting Supplies Traffic Signs Minor Operating Equipment Other Operating Supplies Total Right of Way Beautification - Field Operating Total Operating Expenditures 500.00 200.00 491.34 (291.34) 98,400.00 28,400.00 30,073.11 (1,673.11) 1,500.00 500.00 268.75 231.25 2,500.00 2,300.00 2,830.51 (530.51) $ 394,300.00 $ 130,762.67 $ 108,698.13 $ 22,064.54 $ 42,600.00 $ 7,400.00 400.00 14,100.00 34,300.00 3,900.00 3,000.00 12,500.00 500.00 2,600.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 $ 129,300.00 $ $ 807,300.00 $ 3,300.00 89,900.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 29, 500.00 190,100.00 3,200.00 3,400.00 17,000.00 2,500.00 300.00 8,800.00 10,000.00 1,700.00 25,100.00 67,300.00 800.00 63,600.00 9,400.00 3,000.00 62,000.00 46,000.00 53,100.00 6,000.00 30,000.00 800.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 9,000.00 $ 1,556,600.00 $ $ 2,289,200.00 $ Page 2 of 3 14,700.00 $ 13,801.94 $ 898.06 100.00 100.00 - 5,700.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 - 7,723.00 (7,723.00) 1,300.00 705.50 594.50 300.00 (92.28) 392.28 4,200.00 4,617.55 (417.55) 250.00 250.00 - 200.00 - 200.00 200.00 - 200.00 200.00 - 200.00 800.00 285.31 514.69 500.00 85.00 415.00 28,450.00 $ 30,976.02 $ (2,526.02) 279,500.00 $ 32,100.00 1,700.00 800.00 9,800.00 77,400.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 5,200.00 800.00 100.00 4,400.00 5,000.00 600.00 8,400.00 22,400.00 300.00 51,200.00 2,300.00 1,000.00 20,600.00 25,300.00 23,900.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 300.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 592,300.00 $ 826,012.67 $ 255,280.61 28,868.18 800.00 154.58 14, 279.00 77,999.54 681.99 411.21 4,751.48 1,105.48 76.93 4,400.00 5,000.00 9,216.34 10,508.36 49,759.25 2,692.21 644.34 22,342.37 31,326.75 21,987.40 2,017.60 24.68 1,184.13 2,790.90 548,303.33 756,991.04 24,219.39 3,231.82 900.00 645.42 (4,479.00) (599.54) 418.01 688.79 448.52 (305.48) 23.07 600.00 (816.34) 11,891.64 300.00 1,440.75 (392.21) 355.66 (1,742.37) (6,026.75) 1,912.60 2,000.00 7,982.40 275.32 1,000.00 (184.13) 209.10 $ 43,996.67 $ 69,021.63 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations Other Machinery and Equipment General Improvements Total Water Management Field Operations Capital Right of Way Beautification - Field Autos and Trucks Other Machinery and Equipmeny Total Right of Way Beautification - Field Capital Total Capital Expenditures Total Operating Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserves (2 1/2 months for Operations) Reserves for Equipment Reserved for Attrition Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) $ 1,000.00 $ $ - $ $ 1,000.00 $ $ $ $ 102,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 1,000.00 - - $ 103,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 $ 104,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 $ 2,393,200.00 $ 856,612.67 $ 784,752.04 $ 71,860.63 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ - 79,600.00 43,780.00 42,912.01 867.99 73,300.00 40,315.00 38,134.55 2,180.45 538,000.00 540,300.00 540,300.00 - 94,800.00 94,800.00 94,800.00 (31,700.00) (31,700.00) (31,700.00) 129,500.00 - $ 1,320,000.00 $ 1,123,995.00 $ 1,120,946.56 $ 3,048.44 $ 3,713,200.00 $ 1,980,607.67 $ 1,905,698.60 $ 74,909.07 $ - $ 1,283,293.33 $ 1,378,337.46 $ 95,044.13 Page 3 of 3 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Street Lighting Fund 778 (Unaudited) Assets - Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 480,764.10 Interest Receivable - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 480,764.10 Total Assets $ 480,764.10 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable $ - Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd 28.00 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 28.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved 194,157.20 Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 286,578.90 Total Fund Balance 480,736.10 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 480,764.10 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Street Lighting Fund 778 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Operating Revenues: Ca rryfo rwa rd Curent Ad Valorem Tax Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Insurance Claim Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense Indirect Cost Reimbursement Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage and Freight Rent Buildings /Equipment /Storage Insurance - General Office Supplies General Other Office and Operating Supplies Total Street Lighting Admin Operating Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenance & Repairs Other Contractual Services Telephone Electricity Insurance - General Insurance - Auto Building Maintenace & Repairs Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Other Equipment Repairs Personal Safety Equipment Other Operating Supplies Electrical Contractors $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ 436,800.00 358,176.00 356,844.56 $ 15.36 $ 10,366.50 $ 4,500.00 1,485.00 4,217.41 $ 598,900.00 517,261.00 529,043.83 Variance (1,331.44) 15.36 10,366.50 2,732.41 11,782.83 $ 41,400.00 $ 14,300.00 $ 13,396.52 $ 903.48 5,300.00 $ 2,650.00 2,650.00 $ - 26,900.00 $ 8,966.67 6,216.00 $ 2,750.67 3,900.00 $ 1,300.00 540.71 $ 759.29 2,000.00 $ 200.00 107.69 $ 92.31 12,100.00 $ 4,000.00 4,470.80 $ (470.80) 300.00 $ 150.00 150.00 $ - 800.00 $ 300.00 15.36 $ 284.64 1,000.00 $ 300.00 - $ 300.00 93,700.00 32,166.67 27,547.08 4,619.59 62,500.00 21,600.00 19,732.74 1,867.26 9,600.00 - - - 800.00 200.00 - 200.00 400.00 100.00 108.12 (8.12) 44,200.00 11,100.00 8,769.00 2,331.00 800.00 400.00 400.00 - 900.00 450.00 450.00 - 1,700.00 4,300.00 1,100.00 755.02 344.98 1,200.00 300.00 106.80 193.20 200.00 100.00 - 100.00 500.00 100.00 - 100.00 64.40 (64.40) 7,300.00 3,700.00 3,899.00 (199.00) Page 1 of 2 Light Bulb Ballast Total Street Lighting Field Operating Total Field Expenditures Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery /Equipment General Improvements Total Capital Expenditures Total Operating Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserve for Future Construction Reserves (2 1/2 mos. for Operations) Reserves for Equipment Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) 12,400.00 146,800.00 240,500.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 1,312.18 41,650.00 35,597.26 73,816.67 63,144.34 1,187.82 6,052.74 10,672.33 200.00 - 200.00 1,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 241,500.00 74,016.67 63,144.34 10,872.33 13,500.00 7,155.00 7,179.74 (24.74) 8,900.00 4,895.00 - 4,895.00 228,100.00 228,100.00 228,100.00 54,900.00 54,900.00 54,900.00 - 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 - 22,000.00 - - 357,400.00 325,050.00 320,179.74 4,870.26 598,900.00 399,066.67 383,324.08 15,742.59 - 118,194.33 145,719.75 27,525.42 Page 2 of 2 Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd Accrued Wages Payable Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Clam Bay Fund 320 (Unaudited) Assets $ 383,534.06 383,534.06 $ 383,534.06 Liabilities and Fund Balance 3,090.00 303,213.58 77,230.48 3,090.00 380,444.06 $ 383,534.06 Operating Revenues: Carry Forward Special Assessment Special Assessment Past Due Fund 111 Transfer from Tax Collector Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees Other Contractural Services Tree Trimming Other Equipment Repairs Aerial Photography Minor Operating Other Operating Supplies Total Clam Bay Restoration Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees Other Contractual Services Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Clam Bay Fund 320 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ - 127,100.00 108,035.00 105,927.50 (2,107.50) 26.45 Property Appraiser Fees 496.47 496.47 34,000.00 - - - 75.63 939.67 939.67 700.00 400.00 458.57 58.57 $ 451,311.88 $ 397,946.88 $ 397,334.09 $ (612.79) 163,368.75 $ 70,151.60 29,000.00 349.77 7,500.00 588.01 1,000.00 271,958.13 $ 7,253.75 $ 143,000.00 Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ 150,253.75 $ Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 422,211.88 $ Non - Operating Expenditures: 54,500.00 $ 17,657.75 $ 23,400.00 7,488.00 9,700.00 - 87,600.00 $ 25,145.75 $ 100.00 $ - 1,200.00 - 1,300.00 $ - $ 88,900.00 $ 25,145.75 $ 36,842.25 15,912.00 9,700.00 62,454.25 100.00 1,200.00 1,300.00 63,754.25 Tax Collector Fees $ 3,900.00 $ 2,145.00 $ 2,118.55 $ 26.45 Property Appraiser Fees 2,600.00 1,558.00 1,482.37 75.63 Revenue Reserve 6,700.00 - - Reserves (2 1/2 month for Operations) 15,900.00 15,900.00 15,900.00 - Total Non - Operating Expenditures $ 29,100.00 $ 19,603.00 $ 19,500.92 $ 102.08 Totall Expenditures $ 451,311.88 $ 108,503.00 $ 44,646.67 $ 63,856.33 Net Profit /(Loss) $ - $ 289,443.88 $ 352,687.42 $ 63,243.54 Page 1 of 1 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Capital Projects Fund 322 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets $ 2,665,858.34 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Goods Received Inv. Received Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 110,095.49 11,612.58 2,582,848.52 (38,698.25) 2,665,858.34 $ 2,665,858.34 121,708.07 2,544,150.27 $ 2,665,858.34 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Capital Projects Fund 322 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward Transfer from Fund 109 General Foundation Payment for Crosswalks Special Assessment Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Irrigation & Landscaping Engineering Fees Lake Bank Restoration Other Contractural Services Sprinkler System Landscape Materials Licenses and Permits Traffic Signs Electrical Contractors Other Operating Supplies (Pavers) Other Road Materials Total Irrigation & Landscaping Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserve for Contingencies Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures: Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ - 436,500.00 436,500.00 436,500.00 - - - 53,487.00 53,487.00 331,900.00 278,796.00 276,574.45 (2,221.55) 19,500.00 6,435.00 16,297.74 9,862.74 $ 3,341,284.04 $ 3,275,115.04 $ 3,336,243.23 $ 61,128.19 $ 132,154.37 $ 44,051.46 $ 9,387.15 $ 34,664.31 85,000.00 - - - 2,978,637.97 992,879.32 421,457.07 571,422.25 4,164.19 (4,164.19) 43,031.00 (43,031.00) 17,500.00 1,000.00 (1,000.00) 50,000.00 - - - $ 7,004.18 (7,004.18) 39,568.70 39,568.70 38,553.60 1,015.10 21,323.00 - - - $ 3,306,684.04 $ 1,076,499.48 $ 524,597.19 $ 551,902.29 $ 10,300.00 $ 6,180.00 $ 5,531.53 $ 648.47 6,800.00 4,080.00 3,896.51 183.49 17,500.00 - - - $ 34,600.00 $ 10,260.00 $ 9,428.04 $ 831.96 $ 3,341,284.04 $ 1,086,759.48 $ 534,025.23 $ 552,734.25 $ - $ 2,188,355.56 $ 2,802,218.00 $ 613,862.44 Page 1 of 1 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11. Miscellaneous Correspondence (submitted by S. O'Brien) re: Survey Page 1 of 1 From: Susan O "Brien To: ResnickLisa Subject: pathway widening, etc. Date: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:57:44 AM Hi Lisa, I would appreciate your distributing this to the other directors as a one -way communication. I talked with Stephen Birnkrant at Amplitutude Research, Inc. in Boca Raton, FL to get a ballpark cost estimate of a questionnaire on topics of interest to the PBSD, e.g. widening /repairs to pathways; bike lanes on PBB; funding for resurfacing PBB; doing additional crosswalks and landscape upgrades; and lighting upgrades, etc. He said if we have a number of different topics in the questionnaire, then doing a written survey (versus a telephone survey) is needed. With about 6500 units, he would mail 1000 surveys randomly. Cost would range from about $5500 to compile the data gleaned from the questionnaire results to about $8000 which would include a longer narrative of the questionnaire results. The time from the day the Board decided to do the survey until the Board has the survey results would range from about 6 to 8 weeks. If the time to finalize the questions on the survey is limited to about 2 weeks, then the Board could have the questionnaire data in about 6 weeks. I found Amplitude Research via a google search. I realize this company is one of thousands that does questionnaires, but it does give us a starting point with some basic information. Susan O'Brien CLAM BAY MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT MANGROVE MONITORING REPORT BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR: THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION DECEMBER 201 1 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biblogical Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Introduction The Clam Bay estuarine system is a 570 -acre area of sandy beaches, shallow bays, seagrass beds and mangrove forests on the coast of Collier County in southwest Florida. The community of Pelican Bay abuts the northern and eastern edges of the system, while the Seagate and Naples Cay communities abut the southern portion of the system. The Clam Bay estuarine system is an important natural and recreational resource for local residents and visitors. Clam Bay was designated a Natural Resource Protection Area by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County in 1994 (Collier County, 1994) and consists of approximately 420 acres of mangroves and some 115 acres of shallow, open water bays, as well as a 35 acre beachfront parcel (Clam Pass Beach Park). The system consists of three primary bays; Outer Clam Bay (southernmost), Inner Clam Bay (central), and Upper Clam Bay (northernmost), connected by a series of tidal creeks. The entire system receives runoff from adjacent upland and wetland areas. Upper Clam Bay is connected to Inner Clam Bay by a winding narrow creek. Inner Clam Bay is connected to Clam Pass through another narrow creek. Outer Clam Bay is connected to the Gulf of Mexico by a wider creek through Clam Pass. Some water also flows south to Doctor's pass through the culverts under Seagate Drive. Clam Pass is a small, marginally stable inlet that has migrated north and south along the shore over the years. Prior to dredging, average water depths were -2.5' to -1.0' with a width of 30 -50' (Collier County, 1994). The Pass remains the primary source of tidal exchange for the Clam Bay system, but it is restricted by sediment deposits just inside the pass and in the long meandering tidal creeks surrounded by mangrove forests. The smaller embayments located primarily to the north of the pass are not subject to normal tidal exchange except during exceptionally high tides. Tidal range is restricted throughout the Clam Bay system ( Turrell 1995; Tackney 1996). Clam-Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 The system is bounded on the north by Vanderbilt Beach Road, to the south by Seagate Drive, to the east by the Pelican Bay development and to the west by the Gulf of Mexico. Pelican Bay is predominately a residential community of private single - family homes, as well as both high and low -rise condominium units. The community also includes a golf course, common areas with meeting rooms, tennis courts, beach park facilities, emergency services facilities, and commercial areas with shopping and hotels. The 2,104 -acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in 1977 as a partnership between Collier Enterprises and Westinghouse Communities. It was one of the first developments in Florida required to save fragile coastal wetlands and associated ecosystems (Urban Land Institute, 1981). The development of Pelican Bay had a limited impact on the wetlands themselves (approximately 94 acres in total with about 78 of those acres located in the northwestern corner of the property) leaving the mangrove forest intact and preserved around the bays. In 1992 a small area of dead black mangroves was first observed in the northern part of the system. In 1995 a significant area (approximately 50 acres) of dead and dying mangroves was reported ( Turrell, 1996). Following the die -off, restorative dredging was proposed to increase tidal flushing by opening up the pass and widening several tidal creeks within the system. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (permit #0128463- 001 -JC) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (permit #199602789 (IP -CC)), authorized restoration activities in the Clam Bay system, in an effort to restore the mangrove communities that had died off. The restoration activities permitted by state and federal agency permits required a suite of monitoring activities to assess effects of the work efforts. Those permits expired in 2009 however, the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD), in an effort to remain informed of the condition of the system, and vigilant in their protection of it, pursued new permits in order to continue the maintenance of the flushing channels within the forest areas. Permits were granted by DEP (permit #11- 0128463 -005) and ACOE (permit #1996 - 02789) authorizing this activity. Like the previous permits, the new permits require annual monitoring of mangrove and other components within the system. This document presents a summary of the mangrove and seagrass monitoring which has taken place within this past year. Mangrove Monitoring Methodology The mangrove monitoring undertaken this year was a continuation of monitoring which was initiated under the old permits. The eleven existing Turrell, Hall monitoring plots and the eight existing Lewis mangrove plots were observed. The previously established monitoring procedures were conducted. These included documenting the number and species of trees within the plot, as well as their approximate height. Each monitoring plot is a measured l Om x l Om square staked at each corner and marked in the center with a labeled PVC piping. Monitoring activities included enumeration and mapping of living and dead trees with diameters at breast height (DBH) recorded for all living trees with a DBH greater than 2.5cm. Seedlings were identified by species and numbers were estimated by count or percent cover (where high numbers make individual enumeration difficult). In 2003, each measured tree was tagged and identified with a plot specific number to allow for easier tracking of individual trees as well as to allow easier comparisons over time. Any saplings that grow to sufficient size ( >2.5cm DBH) between monitoring events are added to the tree counts and Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 receive tags and numbers as well. Photographs were taken and any additional observations, including standing water, wildlife or signs of stress are noted. Time, tide, and prevailing weather conditions were also noted for each survey. Meandering transects were walked throughout the system to inspect stressed areas or to observe areas of concern related by residents of the community or identified through examination of aerial photographs. These surveys are conducted throughout the year as needed. Observations made during these pedestrian transects are noted in the general biological discussion of this report. A photographic timeline was also initiated this past year. Concerns expressed by residents led to the establishment of photo points on the roofs of two condominium buildings adjacent to the mangrove area. Quarterly photos are taken from fixed positions on the roof of the Montenero and the Grovesnor condominium buildings. Over time, comparisons can be made of the photographs to determine if any additional die -off or gradual changes are occurring. Each year, scale rectified aerial photographs are taken of the Clam Bay System by Aerial Cartographics of America. The aerials are produced at 200 -scale in both color and infrared versions. These annual photos can then used to compare recovery and die -off areas for the annual reports. Mangrove Monitoring Results A summary of the 19 monitoring plots have been included on the following pages. Plot discussions, comparative photographs, and tree compositions have been included on each individual plot page. i.i O 0. a •r 0 0 O s. O Q � bq cd Cv h •r C% h O L y UQOFA U N O .� r~ •� N > v� "C O .� �! c`dd -4-3 cd Cd 7013 O o 4) ~ q p p N15. 4. p. cd O > O+" U U a a > o -d Cd tb� r- S � - .� 0 C's cis bA O cn to 0 0 x" ° O 0 a E U U O E O U Ln O ' ' O LO r r N In n ❑ ■ ❑ O 0 O Lo O O LO co N N saga; anil 10 jagwnN N Y d co V ca � Fn Q m O N _O O N k A � \ 2 / / 2 \ / 2 ` 2 k as _ ./ •/ § m 2 � 0 /\§\ t \ t \� £\ Ggwo c K ') § § In, § ol � ± & 2 -1:1 o \ / § t ) 7 k § o / / § 0 o / o k ( 2 § ƒ C,3 3 ® % (A o o c ) >1 1) � / \ § k § 3 § k � E § /° § LO \ o 6 m � � w a n ■ O $ < \ � 0*4 I f co : 3 < 0) � � $ \ \ & — — m o sa;a|| 10 jogwnN 3 q � q O a a 0 0 O Y. a+ � e an b Q R cC y O L N to UQCFA :y E .. U O E O O U In O ' ' O U 04 A ■ ■ ❑ M M N N O saga; aniI jo aagwnN L Y d U V CO O m a U) a) Q_ O N 0 0 N o c > abi o In 0 Obi`�E~ o b 3 0 a U U U nag 23 0 > `n U O O b ��. vi = w y^ N TJ U +' p ,O O t 3 0 w cts Cd M ~' U'v CL4 y U'D'C N O O 4 p'C a 'o ff &; 4 U O r� U 415, +^ O• r N U o :° U b O O }+ p O U M ti U ou v y v U p p 0 r'' O ¢, ��, O O U 0 "N r. r. =0 -a � w t = _ v, F. •'" > ti v� • .-. ¢� 'C O H .t= O t8 ti r� 2 C S, O Q. :y E .. U O E O O U In O ' ' O U 04 A ■ ■ ❑ M M N N O saga; aniI jo aagwnN L Y d U V CO O m a U) a) Q_ O N 0 0 N O 0. a 0 0 q bA � U H y � � y h u W 0- C1 0 > U o � d � z 0 cd pUq 'b U .d N }0}..� c 0 d b U� �i C O O D Jb N U U } v Cd V U U O p s O b O U $14 .- -- b N U b U¢ } �+ 4r 1•+ �-+ N i O O tv b bA ¢' N O - U U O d4 .� 04 � 0 r. ti � � � � � U O U" —C,3 '. cd U U O v 0 a E E U O E O U U O � ' O CV L6 n ■ ■ o O LO O LO O U) O M N N saaal ani-I 10 aagwnN N L N Y N U V co m Q 12 HE O N O O N a+ i. O G. d bA C O Y O 0 e L". bA cC t3 r� I� bpy CC N C y U W F A Y I W, O a �I. 'o y vi � h 4.4 � iC N Z A-' O N 3 0 0 X, o 0 0 i� o, � p O -55 'C B .t"r � � � •'" � � fir" � 3 .� o y V� cd 3 0 O cd h cd o to CA O N .d � O cn y �1 M c ;$ vi v 1: 4. on u a �i a 6 i 9 o� o a `i o H 4M J.-= o~� a - A R o E L) L) O E O U LO O ' ' O N A ® ■ ❑ O LO O LO O O LO Cl) N N SOGJ; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N r-• U m Fn N d m CL 0 N Q N k A � 2 / / � \ � / / 2 / \ ■ § m A d /\§\ \� a\ ®f68 G7@Q \ § f ° k ] R 3 \ q ƒ k 2 q\ 2 2 0 ) § E § &`§ § #w7_AA q ct \ Ln 7 \0 'n ?3 o Q > k \ / � k 2 e c \ § ® § 0 .§ q) \ 7 7 2 ,§ § ) A k k 2 A « § '- 0 � o n 7 ( C) qA ] cn n o / ƒ § ƒ + d E § /o § LO \ o � � a Lq w a n ■ ■ O [.�. e � 7 � 4 ! to CD I � � E � 2 � ... � cn \ q 2 / E o sa;aII; agwnN 3 q � M i. O a a 0 a 0 0 L a on ro u y h O � N bio UWEFA 0 a E U O E O U U' O ' ' O U� r N N 0 ■ ❑ CO - " O 00 O It N O saga; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N L En U 'V co d m a cn 12 0 N 0 0 N o o 4, crj a c's .� U .' c 'D Q cd i. .� F� W � bOOiD r �, 4. c a0i cl 3 p° c r a b o �+ w> C-13 604 o a� c"d Vim] .�.+ 0 0 Qr '0 0 a E U O E O U U' O ' ' O U� r N N 0 ■ ❑ CO - " O 00 O It N O saga; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N L En U 'V co d m a cn 12 0 N 0 0 N O a 0 0 0 a � �V •Y y rn L. O :o RI N ti o w � U W H A 44 * - N O >., p - �v bA N EL O .� O 4) '� 3 0 > Q+ O bA .b 0 +� H v > .. ti � "C y b 3 -d 3 a) 'b N cc cd ^� = U p vpi 00 I-, `a >, CO > .� ouov000wc p Az, 7� O cd w _O R3 3 Cd O . �, r3 O W O cud, "C O 0 cd O O csa ,b -0 y 0 �j C� U . F" Q" U b O O E " O E O U LO O ' O Lq r N L6 n L i co w o m Q O to O T O O LO M N N saaJ; oniI 10 jogwnN O N 0 0 N O LL a 0 0 O �s E on ca u h b i O d' C� N ti U�F�1 to G) 44: O O O vj >O _ 0 C,3 y rA 0 Ed O � Z O O U N u N 4. p O cd E U L) O E O o v ui o o CV LO A 0 m 13 O >L N CL Y 4) C) Fm c- U) O N N LO O LO O saai; aniI jo aagwnN a O N O O N k k / k 2 / � \ / 2 ` 2 k §� § as }\k- §\ § \ § ( SgwQ ƒ o � to � r. u ± § & § 3 / .) w•2 u 7 § [ ©/ C13 «) \ ° / m ' © ] = R = b 2 q t u .) ƒ �,§ '§ / �.§ & r / c' § o A 2 >1 2 o § En } \ k % § \ \ k § \ & U O 2 — / En v 2 0 A b R o cl ) > § 2 u / cd lu § \ ) ƒ / ƒ p 0 U Ln �. .ƒk k 3 q � q E § /o § / LO o . , 6 U� - w a n ■ ■ ❑ � ± Q i o ( 2 0 % $ m a � 2 � ± 2 2 m Co 2$ 9%\\ k salaII jo agwnN 3 q � q i O a a 0 0 0 en Q C Oq cCpd ci ed � y b+ y to O L � U W H A E C) U O E O U U' O ' ' O Uf r N U� n m ■ O a� >L o Y IL 0 CD Q Cl) i C) LO o o Lo O Cl) N N saaJ; aniI ;o aagwnN O N 0 0 N ° a� ° 00 0 c �O o rA,0 0 �O p 01 ° b oy a" Ed °' � o Q) 0 y' a ° $ .� 04 o 3 ° o r' c ° o -� b ol O � � � � • � 'C � � bA ti � �• �i�y-i �, �• p N V �"� U y �. "o o c c� C ° cd 9 03 o U E C) U O E O U U' O ' ' O Uf r N U� n m ■ O a� >L o Y IL 0 CD Q Cl) i C) LO o o Lo O Cl) N N saaJ; aniI ;o aagwnN O N 0 0 N 0 � : � g *4 k A 7 \ \ 2 / 2 / k / \ 2 � \ � % $f§ m2a / \2\ \Z\ E � f _ k w / 7 � � o 0 2 � ' s � . � i R 2 2 9 \ ° s|■eo1aJJL 2 � \ _ o •2 3 � 2 03 © R / 3 §&� ƒ+ § % cs f / � / ) j'� § � § q o � f _ k w / 7 � � o 0 2 � ' s � . � i R 2 2 9 \ ° s|■eo1aJJL 0 a a a en 0 0 0 c Cd U c h .b 40 ca Z bq CU Cd O Q R N O ice. N U4E-(� i Y i m d CL a� H o N { L p ` c a f0 N O 00 (O 't N O r r r r sle4ol aajl o "" o ° 4. ° o > •y ° o +' ~ > O O O O }}>.. cd — O v U U -0 O cn t4l C H O O U O •.. i Y i m d CL a� H o N { L p ` c a f0 N O 00 (O 't N O r r r r sle4ol aajl Yr O a 0 0 0 � u O d' o ct x O 1z+ E UWF-C1 O O � U 3 a 9) m i C. O > O CD d > M N 0 O ct U (9 m i C. CD d > M 0 O � a � � 7D Q) O� N O O O N r 000 M M M 1e ;01 aaJl k A / � / / / 2 \ / 2 / \ ■ & %2a ƒ /�/ \� �( G¥@o � % a � 3 7 2 � 2 I � E E co 9 \ ° Sleol a j.L %nz _ •g « + _w q � •2 ° � � k j / § j E \ 2 •§ 'c § © � / & > 2 § -0 / % � k � 0 ci3 � � % a � 3 7 2 � 2 I � E E co 9 \ ° Sleol a j.L 0 a a en c 0 c 0 0 lC U � h h y O Q O ca x UWF�C� I I � m m Q � d > LO o O = IL i I N L M N O O SIBIO.L Gail ° 4. o > � > � v O c r kn U p 4-. a m U � I I � m m Q � d > LO o O = IL i I N L M N O O SIBIO.L Gail k & / / ■ k / � \ � \ / 2 � 2 k m 2 Q ƒ \2\ t \ * t \mot\ \ /d\ � f � 3 � I k / 7 0 7 � I � � / \ \ 2 / m o s|■eolaj.L « g � � •/ � k ) . nzj%Q)\ /+ � C) § % V U — ) &� c = = A 7� o « o \ � § « LZ ) � c Ln o ® u ) � � f � 3 � I k / 7 0 7 � I � � / \ \ 2 / m o s|■eolaj.L k � / \ \ 2 / 2 \ k / \ 2 � 2 k [ * § \ {Q �kkm § /§( Sgwo 7 § •� — g 2 / » c . ƒ 0 $ % ° § \ ƒ Q) 3 C) § ƒ 0 0 § U / � o « E ° § ƒ f . Co > _ k ® c £ 7 m � / LO o m o m o m o r o M n q q _ — s|■eo1aj.L iyr O 0. 6J a 0 0 O (C U Cd f� FH Cd O d' O cl x O ice. N U W F-o C� Y U (0 m r o �, v1 C j � C CL O O O O O O O O N O w (o N N r r r sIe;ol Gail -cs °' o���� cr a 0 =s cl -mod >0 ° � ct cl 0 -0 cl c� O W) Q �s U O p O O Q, --Co's U) ., O H E O Y U (0 m r o �, v1 C j � C CL O O O O O O O O N O w (o N N r r r sIe;ol Gail Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Condominium Roof Photos Montenero Roof July 2011 Montenero Roof October 2011 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Grovesnor Roof January 2011 Grovesnor Roof October 2011 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Another issue that arose this year was the presence of a boring beetle attacking stressed trees in the early months of the year. Observations within the system and research into the life habits of many boring beetles led to the conclusion that white mangroves affected by the sustained cold temperatures in December 2010 and January 2011 were most susceptible to the beetle attack. Cold stress reduced the abilities of these trees to fight off the boring activities and many trees succumbed to them. Yellowing leaves, leaf drop, and eventual death of the tree was the result. Efforts were made to identify the beetle but since no adults were collected, it was not possible to identify the culprit down to the species level though it was narrowed down to some type of a flat- headed borer (Metallic beetles). Continued vigilance will be maintained to see if additional infestation occurs in healthy trees instead of just the already stressed ones. Borer damage to stressed tree Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Seagrass Monitoring Methodology Seagrasses are a valuable biotic indicator of environmental health and the PBSD has recognized the value in maintaining viable conditions for seagrass growth. The original permitted dredging design - entailed impacts to seagrasses within the channel between Outer Clam Bay and Clam Pass. Monitoring over the life of the permit was designed to allow documentation of the regeneration or loss of seagrasses within the system and follow the effect of increased tidal flushing on seagrass aerial coverage and density within the potentially affected beds. These monitoring practices have continued in order to further document the overall health of the Clam Bay system. Monitoring methods include examination of aerial photographs and ground truthing by in -water and wading surveys. Accurate estimation of seagrass coverage is primarily hampered by visibility. The type of seagrass and limited visibility make estimation through examination of aerial photographs almost impossible. The most effective survey technique has been diving and wading transects and the most effective time has been at low tides when shallow water and substrate exposure make coverage estimation easier. Best effort was made to overcome the visibility obstacles in those areas that were deeper. Due to the ephemeral nature of the grasses being monitored, the survey methodology has been slightly modified from what was originally permitted in the 1998 permits. It was noted early on that the seagrasses shifted in location from year to year and that fixed quadrats in the same location year after year did not accurately depict seagrass coverage or presence within the Bay. More general observations of the presence of grasses along these transects have been used to locate the grass beds with the quadrat measurements used to quantify coverage within those areas where grasses are found. Grass beds in or adjacent to the transects are then mapped with a handheld GPS unit (Garmin 76c) and transferred to an aerial exhibit. Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Seagrass Results Outer Clam Bay: Transect 1 Transect one was surveyed with a surface supplied air source and snorkeling gear in water depths from 2 to 3 ft. Visibility was approximately 8 -10 inches and was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. Halodule beaudettei (Shoal grass) was found within quadrats 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, of this Transect. The general area of grasses along this tansect remained consistent with last couple of years and has expanded slightly from the original pre- dredging monitoring. Densities of grasses was higher in some areas and lower in others but overall was generally consistent with last years results. In addition to the grasses, oysters (Crassostrea virginica) were also observed along the mangrove fringe line. Oyster clumps (approximately 6 inches by 6 inches), upside- down jellyfish (Cassiopeia xamachana), lightning whelks (Busycon contrarium), fighting conchs (Strombus alatus), shell debris, and red, green and brown algae ( Rhodophyta, Chlorophyta, and Phaeophyta) were also observed along Transects 1. Transect 1 45% 0 0 40% 35% 30% 25% o 25% 20% 20% 15% v 15% a 10% 5% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Shoal Grass (Halodule beaudettei)(formerly H. wrightii) Lightning Whelk (Busycon contrarium) (Transect 1) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Outer Clam Bay: Transect 2 Transect two was also surveyed via snorkeling gear and wading. Water depths ranged from 1 to 3 ft. with visibility approximately 6 -12 inches but like Transect 1 this was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. A small area of Shoal Grass (Halodule beaudettei) was observed along this transect between quadrats 1, 2, and 3. The density of this grass was very sparse (maximum 10% coverage) and was mixed in with some Caulerpa algae. Caulerpa was also observed in other areas along this transect and throughout the system. Transect 2 12% - - - -- _ ..— - — — 10% e 10% 8% U 6% 5% 5% C 4% L d CL 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) O rD D rD Z3 r-F tom' D rD 9J lD 1< n O LA LA O rF O N n < rD ro � N F °1 n m LO Ln 1+ O L _ v Q Q rD • n n rD o 0 p < � D rD o -+. =3 LO CT- rD Q- O Ln rD Ln N rD N' O N _ lQ O � � 7 n (D n � v O Ln rD 3 N LA _ 1• LO W-, O Q CD v n rD 1 1 \ I � \ M \ \ x \ I 1 I v m D Ir I I +/- 4' -0" D � 1 — z m O � CD G 1 i l N O 4 k x i I z / 1 M v m M m � --I p 70 7J X X 77 / / O LA vi 1 -^i 0 0 O 0 -d -d m / A D O O v r) z z �O -0 > D � G) G) :--k� O CO 0 o Z O D z / / �"'�' Mz V) m ;p -n M G1 z I mm* z» Z p �z> ^'O r L") -0 _ CO Z O D-, n Mm D U Z =O :E Po v CO m Dm Z D (A w D m r w • W Ln N 0 -0 --+, o N cQ Q v, C r (D O ED r) _ + Q cc p' 70 � Q O rD O 0O 0 N Q in p rD < rD O +1 • D m rD 3 m v 0 o o = N m r ��.o73 Q r � rD r LO = Ln N O O rD _ v ID v D Q a rD Q 3 (D O v 77 • r n Or 3 CC rD rp n C7 Q 0) v L o *. LA -C-, n rD < : 0 ;^ LO 0- O r, O 9, O N o. N �. Q o C +, rD ,. 0 Q O L^ -0 N• Q to rD La ,g:arD CD v m -v O — ;7- .+ 77- CD 0 LO n O rD a) Q O r+ O 0 o m -- �< rD O LO Q -O 3" m 1-0 zr v Z O Q Pelican Bay Improvement Plan I Phase III ® B I IS I o SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHKI J-I -'. I I I I I g - -- `1 .................. l I I I I II�� mti I I I I I I Ii I► ;I m II I I I I I mA IZS IT I I Z p � w 3 IIN f I II D i by L+ 1 I " y; �I mw 1iV 177 + J71 I 15`� r^►� ,, I j I I I � 1 I � c5$ I II II I I J� I i l D m hti� PY } + a 09 "B r d�I y yr x `fie II U` fT v +1 R.i2 CD I° °m �z m m I ' CD I I m b m fl. NR Do ( z b I o + m S Imm ( ^ 08 Ia Om \SNQW WOJ) 4r.° p 13/U21Q 31b't112Id _gig m. SDI I I a�y�y Z A 2 0 11 y9 A p 3 rn Icy Lf 7.4 37 SO �� 1� I DImj1A rO m mR. 4 I O O L I I Z Z: T a, I l o y A�moD TD I I 2 n� 1-I Ij, O N3_ .1 I TIC... I a I33�3'� a r N�� I f < IE �1 ,y�l aw 6 I I_ < G ' )IL II I i � y x� I I I y 0 w j an I ZeL II � � � n p i I m+ i I I m x m �\I 01- . ¢I'a i m m 1 m� 18 if m m9xm o o 0 0 y I I E oa a �Z 5O Ivl OHO I m. {{ �Im ;O p> m$ M. I p Z I 2j . Si Z Q y i I I y 8 ' A m I I k o N O a n� Z I I I O kz zvm 1( /9'<x r9� I m 'l 3 m ) T m I I l I 1 ( o y p m I L m + �/ f � .v 1 I d O p O �om A 2 �O1 V II yCI I A Z O }{ OD Cry C L�� I I mD� I i1 j p G. INn }} OI C .11_- v N m 91•� I� w fn 2 ^ T C I Z `� oD N �T 59 Ixo .Nm m m I c 1�C o 0. 8 L 1 �� o :a 5 z m m FeL i Nae a'�" I! ° ----- 1-------------------- ��_II J SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEE r . ............ ... J...c __..�.. ---- . - - - - -• a '�axate s SEE SHEET RETL9IR J. PR°.IECT RAI®: m > B -R9 -11 10 PATH CN16NT k IIBST b� a b b ii fl R'� ° H 6 "$• � � ,� cr�RT RARE: $ � e° o N PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY �� o y g ° K WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAYS �R K ° n ,� .. K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION 1y ••� x _ =� a °� W w T e ; m DW.R,° 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 $ $ ' a k SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING. 1T A - - 1 b j SEE SHEET 3 _ .`. .. ......... SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET I 1 I { - - - -- I 50'B I V a Qg l 1d t I I I m I �1% 9 y N m I 01 1 ss .'p I I Lo'B 814 9.04 ds 96.L �r0 w Nam ° 66L 02 ° z am s sa s9 - °m I �+ti 9D i N X ymQ� 3x -P D� Sma I " ym G) op I I A T� I }S O I1 } -o I m 'Lx 4L'L 00'B 89'4 rZ Jb� I I m 0 0 I at 1 1 ZL'L ' ; I I � L6'L i -v `\\' m I I s ,6'L A�I ° � I. 3At 3I�dNad Z I i I�� D I RTo� I � A III s rAm 3N }I LL Lf G 7 I -4 >> X01 I W�A 2.� lO 8a< I Z9x! kbW T I 1>1 9 C 9 N m N O z N S9'11 x lti B* x O II Z ooy m m 60B 8 k S9L ' x o 0 i x 9Z B�4 I N II I b�D 76• 0 6 +� l9 omma 1 zo V , QUA— z I '. "& e I- �✓ I° I �° I ti° I i �z l i i D -Tn it v u y4k Va v� y p a D 411 %JW I II i I I rA� L7 �N` i 9. I� bo �� 9 amoO I I � X. � � N '2 c Z i I 9BL �k 1a� I:N 19 I { LV9 1 I I i 66'B k e °' 1� 4 �U3 n a o m m I �.`........ � SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET gg ,___ -. I- �•••- •_••••- SEE SHEET 5 CLIENT N PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY ryLN1919N: PELICAN BAYx �= ° •..Q .1.9f MR AUG MM6NNS k t! � ,,,�� w 'STSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION O �y' w K NORTH TRAM STATION x .. ➢�"�c PAVING, 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 krJ to o > o SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, NAPLES, FL 34108 s GRADING & DRAIN AGE PLAN (2) to - SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET . ..............i...... i II II I �I I II II I � I I I i I I II II I III I I II I I I I sc a I + I I 1 I I I II �t 1 I II i I I 1 ``IjI I 0x 0k zz6� � 111 < �t 1 II 1 I II 1 I II I I II I I I1 I I I II III LS'$ k �N I1 I I II I I II I II I 1 I 1 H DI r+ o .. w O N � A N (ji e �e J i d I } 83 N l Ixaw � 1 N 'S ' H DI r+ o .. w O N � A N (ji e �e J i d Z li N l Ixaw � 1 � UTA(7D Z ;r 1 A00 lm {yam nN pro 3� C =VIn Nz dO 1 II jj A3o �O�II b m O O � r SEE SHEET I .fs � � W • EJ, Io 0 9b'" //� K •4 % _ 8 £� i � 1T1 D v I m �II o m 4 O v 21 ti `I 'I �I }I I �a x m N� ,ov S 1 �• I ' `11 zl s, 31. I sl jXVW vez w N c :I i 8 e SS r A m GIN 3b~ t 01-1, 26 0 00M� o . N m Z i $ Z po 'Z' N av �� 0 I C W el �m O m Q A, o SEE SHEET ----- T................. I -i - - - -- 66'L qwtl v I �+ I I I II I I II I I� I � I W I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I b9 bo 1; f Z li TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y Ixaw � 1 � ro V 1 t t}l I 1 II 5 t 1 II I I 1 dO 1 II JcA 19SN X O SEE SHEET 0 00M� o . N m Z i $ Z po 'Z' N av �� 0 I C W el �m O m Q A, o SEE SHEET ----- T................. I -i - - - -- 66'L qwtl v I �+ I I I II I I II I I� I � I W I I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I b9 bo 1; f aA19 SV— IOHOIN I4l N Z n = L D C m m y Q o "�°°' °" > TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y NAME: PELICAN BAY Q ADNbR PATH ALICwFST ROl! BIOBARIt�R � PELICAN WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION X I dO I �� JcA 19SN X O GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (3 � � W • y 1 0 9b'" //� O°' 71 I I<� k £� i S�8 %L6' I ti 1 I X'. Ism fi ti 1 °nl v� � 0 g •9 ' II II 1 11 ?i I '1 I II 1 Op I II I 1� %Z - - -- I SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET aA19 SV— IOHOIN I4l N Z n = L D C m m y Q o "�°°' °" > TT�dcLzNT BAY BOULEVARD PA 1 rl Y NAME: PELICAN BAY Q ADNbR PATH ALICwFST ROl! BIOBARIt�R � PELICAN WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO SERVICES DIVISION NORTH TRAM STATION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 I n ¢ � SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING NAPLES, FL 34108 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (3 SEE SHEET 5 SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET .................... .......... �.-------- i- " y....... l l� l I I m I 'f0 ' I I II {� � ) JI 1 SI t1 J ♦� � rn r ray —0 ` ^' 0y q 090+ % m 6 II > Z M\ (n 00+ l p m l l II o � O 0 UR All m- D I I.0 f m0� U1I L 0V 1 I ZAO A�0� l I,yIa A$ mA I m Db ❑ - z I I I 1 I D � Dx 4 y 1 � z c m a > II} I 1 v_ 7I n v _ I I— w I u ! 1 vn�J I p3D00 Ae,� �F I I $II lmz I I w 1 ; 'a + '�•dy i + lI m � '�A m { O Z I I I A ql a— ���� r4 "z5 0 9 3 I I 3AI80 c� 1 I s q +4 >A 31VAINd < l I I .Z1 I I «>a o 1 re� ytiet I I �� Z�e III r, > ig I I i I r A 4 I I 1 I <<m I t [ N mom I I < I II i xs I tI 1 I L t I I I III � I I .1 V `b I I I IW 00 poll II II 4 g F O f 2 Mm 41 Ism III I 1 I I 0 m m I I I III �frgr -- I 1, �4 11 1 ............ ----------------- ± I :...e6.0 . . Ii ... ...... Q � ------------------ �-- ___- _-- _-_____I - SEE CLIENT NAME: �+'t i9 ^. iii.o..• NEp63NN: > �a ° PR�JECf PATHWAY p �a; . m g nun Hlolan»� " � � � N � � � � PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PELICAN BAY �5i14 WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO a, s 2 a ^ C p= a K K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION = I <Z > : m NRAWM TITLE: SUITE 605 ' 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, 0 0w SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 8 I..r GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (4) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET .v -- - - -- -.... E= SHE....... .... ... I � � I P gV I ' I �--�✓ I I 6�a I Ay I I o y66 W A Z 9 Igby f m 4 + I m 4 ', Q� I tom I I i }I I IL i I 1 I�� I 1 1 11 9p A v I> I I I {I • ?J ry I\ g I I i I AH/E�AD AHEAD I I I 3 n m I I I I I I{ Y I B69 A Z I 0 I /[ I I m m 9fZ/l' -o I I Ky alTTii ZZ N I I \g ... } + am a t T c6 a6 W" p= 9 )lMVdJ31`dM) m m 3AIJ4 31`dARId ! mp Nz,2M am I I I a6�1 Vie* ir°n �Tm _� I :2m pmx °le �9 fia V F I !n 66 I � � m ISO I Y o1m0 9 lO I IyA <m m I ybg I I yy �.I i y2m�D s, I I 1 `{ ZE I 1 I I f. Zoe 8 I I: O� No D I S� vCl a Tm °z c"iD' o -� 11 j l m x�n� II � 9 z cry I I I # pN 3n N 6 0r qro i� B8J nm w A n /rmi ti� p pq p 0 cm I ss op, 9D� � m m I I I a II Az- D m. 1d I �6 g46' g Fi y I I 9 } + a V N ILI f Os- t ¢t r s � we v y z EE�l EE a >p Q I I I � ca Cal o m I f ono aQA 4 ° �e :2 II I I Y O sack I I I�i�`6�' I m � D 6 g-- - - - - -' o a. HiF 21 . - -.--I t _ -------- .---- - - - - -- r- - - - - -I I rrI I I - - - .------- - - - - -- - -rz M 17 li' m � -• m o 2a, Naetid t� SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET SEE SHEET 8 qxp a m a NC9b1"N: i� o m e PRO: ECL NAYR: CI.I£NT NAME: �....... �`" ° "' "�T " °" °"�' PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY = a e PELICAN BAY �R ° O y = o — ; V✓ESTSIDE - COMMONS TO en. o z NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION = , I e . e x 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 � 2 s w — SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 a J GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN (5) 8 SEE SHEET 7 SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET ....... . " " " "' QLr------------- - - - - -- 1 I gr14,� I ®- �''s y ( u N I \ V ($ I E I a •s z�x �, e tipr g -z I I I II Il (S3811Md .a dVO) I I > 3/1Jao 3.LVA]bd I III i II �a I I� gym' w r I I ili III`, � O w .i? B ?g 6 it � ❑ Z I I 'o m a.52 in A °� ' m ytim 1 ti I y o` " 1 i 9 .p A Z p yO I �rny j kLt-8 I i '.;I �AOm lo�czi I =o m � I O.H b� ,IIi ms" 0_ }rg r X mX 606 I ONmOD s •Ei y o ,n O f/1 IRI .0 p I ti I N Z-III D I z �ot/INN I I 1 o N o D I W II �m p�eoo WII I I may m5> 30 1 aZ II I i "611 I 64'6 I \ V ( 00'0`x, Z6'6 92-64 9Z'6E$ I i r w AA I �I SY6 O y } 2 v x I I p I a D v 64'6 A I 4 i ono I � I s II r l tI ti vl 81 -6 Q+ I I 91 cl m I a I m I I 51.6/ , I I SZ'64Z'6 i I Yl6 I I. I I I I I I 2z'6 I myl +g 0* 0 + IS -6 �} ' b I ypb� �• 4" 0 „6 t9'6 ` I I QB l° I I I 066£ I I a has 1 I I I I by I I 1 I I I vl. I x I �I n z o ebb I y m •-- •---- ...... _ - i.l._... .6.. _ - -• p ` tb/ G�i'\ y� 0g\I I:0 3 4 biEl Ply\\ Bo/ SEE ISHEET 9 -- - -- -L ---\ --'' - - - -�-' SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET a RE 10N: �m m m v PRDJECf NAPE: CLIENT NAPE: -x 6 §A •iiiiiiii -¢9 -11 ADJUST PAIN AWRNYENS' A IlFST ROI! LING. „N s ' PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY " � y A>R 9I�BAIU�R � e PELICAN BAY K WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION y c ° y A I m PRA me Tnu; 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 O 0�1 - py rn m SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 LA pp GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN {6} - SEE SHEET 8- -� * -- -_- --- - - - - -- °- r------ - - - - -- °I- _mi.ww N a` SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET Jb °•�+ � $51 t o QS �.. I zFiy I oy� w� oA I I �1 m9 Igo i l I I w � II m � I xvw .4 W �� \ �4 nA I 10 S ZO'6869 m $ YM 9 r- 9TH <1 a w� � hF.9 xlp"TI I x� I J p m x I v n 5 T l I wmx I I w II l i A (-aA18 a31aVN3HD) o 3ARla 31VARld xJ-m v (13VHdVN -1S) m s o 009f'S 3A121a 31b�Al�ld m m T\ I h9'6 r� A I m m om mm m of L m D _ -' 2 w OZ9 `g Sc m g w c,: x__� . g 7 � +° I I ��m 8m pNmm I m i �m myN csT I l909 Ib mmx mk w HOV39 cp {/ I 29 I m 0 9L9 j tics 'm l� ti $ I 9mmxl I N � � ss 0 99'9 /m A�NA�m FI'6• . I I c-41 l Z O m P99 i I `N y 0 Y J =omN> x �p II �`SO'8 �' B•Qq O� N o D a p N 99L I1'93 m °��' Wi g° -{� k I a c c�-1 my� I I y ANEAO, fluI I • xvw �, y • III tJ o I le S r m p I" a .b .s 1�TL� 1 I 1N �r ti m ° bolt D •� - y m W I I N I� I> I I I I I g 33 II i U > c � 9Z' 9V v i 2 o m � I o N impN I I I W of Z v I? � i� S aA A I I II z> II II m b I A I $ > II I I � 'o s I zs n m m I� -�� �_ - - - - -- - - - -- -� '--- " - - - -' SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET - - -- SEE SHEET 10 a m a g M �R.E,8 Y9 -6 2e19 0,-oN1: 1 AO9 N ST PATN ALIG a< MJEC N ! IMW N E: g § . ......... MT W Un. PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY PELICAN BAY 1 5, "O- WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO O o K K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION tA H ° A m m D9•� �"� 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 g SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 8 A N �I GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (7) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET - --- - - - - -- SEE SHEET 9 ---- - - - -......... ......................... -- -- , ?- - - - - -• -�I - I r - I I ( I I LCg� I �_ i � � I a 94'6 SSS � �� e I I, kvW f51 I I I �C � i,' �i` + •�+A I 9`6' i 92'g I I I I I I,u.06 W Ism I �Nx 410 w �s I] ;m;li0 I� � I � 9 �w � 16L( +�•Oy 0 Zp N I I I N ymm Qrti m00 m I s ICI .0 t- 13VHdV21 '1S) 3ARl(3 31VAlbd _..... . — ...._..__.__.__... ..... 1 85 �S.3 h m I � •' m I I S} � S a mm ✓ w m la 1 z � <c I I ff 4e ? m - t hhh z 9 m i� II 8 � A iti49P 33 m 6Vy� � 'e m m m �cm D Z A X f s y Cm I I O m O O .� m N s p I y z ]l 0 0 3 S~ m x 4 9 A �b m <m yz p m I x' m wbam -iy Dr m a mm< I O, n a D 0 I A az• ga? x Z O y )I� zNny I 0 \ { O�� 10 toadNOa03 b1 -11A) I b° oo I i > ��I +s 3AING 31tlN?!d -, m I 2 \ m m a A C 'j m D Dn ( .0+ I I L' �% . J 847 ......__ �ZAA % m ~ .. N n � 0 I I: r GI � 4] N Ll 1 � m C m I 3�• Spy I I N p }I 9L8 >=Po3 O Z I A CST I '' }/ /� �4 I?ge0 ft I I I I %Z 64 8• (E I N I I Ii W I I 0 L9 ❑ Im A T om 03 I h W z p m ef•e IyII o�: � e�ai *�, i m �pS� � � 8 � : o °° I 0 El Imo y bl9 Z x I a 4; i phi I I AZO Fi 6 o i ktlW A O rI - z 'o �II zz� p�8 w" S �h mom +iml 2oB a C+h c mNp I I �b D ypm ps I I vD 1 ¢ � II v z A f0•a °y I 11 II If o f I 1\ �'z� B.54 a I C 494 a Z I ` .52 I,� b � II q�+ I 4 m � L06 I II A I II I �I (V1139SVW 1V 3A03 3H1) I Aymn 2CA I Na LZA I I °Sm Cpl �m I 3AR1a 3.LV/MlJd 1 Aye pa�ti mx sm T<m I I ('1 vt �� A I I II. ,�Il��+ VV I J I m v I { 1 94•4 1/ SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET o .... ... .... .... . ......... -. . ..- - _ ®sue -. - - -. .....�..�..~�..I .{... ... SEE SHEET 11 T RETRi16N: o PROJECT NAYS: CLIENT N"E: �tlq: ccaE G2 .. iii.•.iii r m 6 ,; B -Q9 -11 kONST PATH ALICNYENT k 1lFST ROI! LINE. z� m % i 1 s9 I w- :•• �, - AYa aI9HARRTER PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY pELICAN BAY �; r rn c d WESTSIDE COMMONS TO 441 Y y K K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION y ° DRA> c Tau; 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 a A C ° GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (8) 8 SEE SHEET 10 -s_�SEE :OP VIEW THIS SHEET r............ ,...x .�n1.. 1. g,,�...... ......... 90 L ex `' " ............. 664 I / Il i ° II m zOm I B['a } m N � tiy4 fps m .wt ti is. 72 I I I � a s III I I •«--_ � v yy I T I I I I II y X I A Z O I I II Z 3 I i it • i I m � z �\•'�46� � I �I 'L0 II I � s I I �• I I ' I 11-�W I ° Z I \a o BBB o II ! IEl I I i > m } I es`B a 6 'i 94'8x 1 t I II I day l I� I� 6.66 I ss'B x m a m II � I III 'I h h 9 I °AZ 909 I I V< AZy I p 8 I I I I II7 � • ��� gmm I I i Zr$.y •Eg �i � I � � 8iD I I I ED •� �itO I m" I ys ` 3AIJQ 31VAR1d I oz I }I TIIns II J w Ll8# I 4 o ° I ti 9 V tiI w 3< 6LY I ,£ I m ti w mT 'B V Or�-m O� z Bl'6x f A L y fi 3Nmim IZ9 . I D N I I 7 I'_� Zow �� � w w I •'° � Iri A_� �� T, a� ANON I m 90/!9 I I D oN�O I 05r I woUA 11D'9 _ + 'A0 �f� -2 I ��o I ice, (til'138�IdW) 3 11C 31VAIbd m I e S o I m y 11 Z I ,I 1 8 0 0 U j ❑ z 1 a •' — . l I# V I f ° I •� 1 c, 01 c, v? > A p 0 a m I l I � m LI�a I i j I 3 W I i W o i Lbgl 0I 0� > I `O y + A iA I I I I I � I V I I � I kVW I 4 I m I I I� I vz I C �In� op I 0. Z 0. I I 99 .�m a° . I e v0vy I ° 1 A20 °°yo i Z AZO I I s 'y 4 I AO I I P o m I S5:• .m o m I amm I � a °fig •�+ �'e �� � I °ypfig I ; I + A A gg> I aN� II I A I a II IF 1 I I I Z I N (• Z I Cn A I I I `o"i ocu n vl I. N j I IaaR Ht SEE SHEET 12 SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET c m a RCYHI9N: >o m PROJECf NA1�: A6cc G �q•ii'•iiii 8 -29 -11 a.N PATH AL[GNIIOiNNl' k REST ROW CLIENT NAME: .-a a AD9 EI96ARR�R N m n PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY a- ••� °"" o o ° K = OVESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAY g Y z x cn K NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION Crl CD O J ��� "Oa x 5a 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN &STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108_ R� GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (9) SEE TOP VIEW THIS SHEET ..- T I T I }SEE SHEET I'---------------- - -- . - ... ...... -------- - - - -Ij ---- •---- - - - x,, I I I yy 1 s I � Iz'8 mn0v 4y I�oG Iw nb( °w I I rC ° I II I M i NX 0 I TN A I %2 = 00 —0 I I 40'6 1, I I I bL9 yA I I Ill 11 4G 8 W I I � I Zm� I a a � � n N I` I In v I + N L L9'G fl } {{qq N o.o O�y�yZy 3�1m?� I e ©J,g7 �Z' @� \'J •• m O ,9r,� 2 Ll W A N I '�I I B� �'7j 1 m 1p I I 1 1 £a 949 A y m I I I A (OS3N31NOW) 9y A W A p9 0 J. 3AR1(] 31tfN21dZ y o Ta< x� I I� a •�st. I 5 - YL m N N + d . II I pI s I I 4Po ( I I. I I I �Am m T N N I yr 30 I � I 1 >9 I I xvwj I 0 I I a$ >9L t t sre�i e O�m O> O I I ! e.f 1 3q2 y� A o 0 2 (0 Rl I I I I II { II �A�sA "�Zy€ I III III I I 17 Omay ZoNNN II I � p'N = I � Z I I, zg I II I 3 N }I4 � 1 I I I I 's 1 nv I l �I m A0 8 y; I zS— x g O 0 mom I m I 82'B x- d w Z SO'9 m 4! i! 0 m I oO Ok18 �o ti y y 2 An AD I 1 A,8 Gl 41 0 I p � A I im 51 > o AviA � m I 9 I o i; I I = s s > �° J. I m�= I ` o� I I 5 D = r mp o °O° 7I�t n�8 I I I 7J DO OX I I 2 8 y Z W I 5S oa-P I I 1z$ any W I I �� O NAo. I 1 k Zyy Z �yA I I K OHO O y Z 1 N$o> I I xvwl y°� �y g I �c 1 vozg I 1 �m j I Zyxz9 C: O i a 1 rcC o. O CDY m N 109 1 �' pct A N 1i 2 I8 oa N mj Dr A 4i 4.9T 1 X w N D j/. m V I l l a ...... I........... a......l.l - . -....• ..- i -•... ..................... SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET......... SEE SHEET 13 m a RCYbIDN: ,�o a m m e PNDJECT NAId: cm NAME: 8 -Q9 -11 ADJUST PATN ALIGNMENT k TEST -W LINE. Y L 0 �, a ADD 91DDAIDMIX �N m PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY O C :c PELICAN BAY k WESTSIDE — COMMONS TO .� tA NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION DJU�NVC TTt7.6: 9 n yr � m 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 x � GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (10) C/1 N SEE TOP VIEW THIS SEET �e - 1----------- i - - - -- r ___ -� ,r SEE SHEET I2 7 .. ........... o90f I I p N I I 1 f I ~ 0 x I u ]L I m m it I Bfi •L� I �. tP } t I xvw 1 I I ' ps.G �8 I I x 0 x < yy ti rh j������ Cwr-+ Aa I D Tm_ b 4�ni I I r j D> I I Na FmT rA Np mmm Qp4< I L sp" I 9T gg I I I Z SC'G ®` \ I i i i �S9LJ I I" t m ► � , � j� � � eti� I I � 0 I i s I 4 r.. l I $ oy x I Im m /-\ I} t r D oo�� � I %Z Z n� I I I kl 698 � I I I S C j 1 I 71 W II I a y I XL x`& < I I I I ` I I a, LJ MziaN31V ) AINd 16, �J I mII I I I I i 1 m I 0-0 N A(l n O I I I Ij J { O' p o m -i I d m . r I I Im r A >>mCr � Im I I I I ICI I I/ I Ng m� n G Z - °Z =� I I ooNN(F/1 w 1 Nan I l I n � II II I I I9F'8 I 59L f 6y i S 0� m -10 o0. S -nir <m ' I (((m I I� J o n 'WW f GI m C A — I I I %� 1� 0 1✓ t u o III I��4y r $0 IW.�VIIO Dy�� ��p� Ap I a o z ° I I ` n --m f m m y I I II 0 I � =�N D� p I� p m II Z '57 I I r I I I I s7 1 � 8 I I m ?4 V7 ° m Z I II v I i° Z W I . I °moo g c II } x I W zb I I I. to, IG y 9� 7,16 I I m o v I I 'B8 I III °boo °tea- xzI k oP n I I I bZY /zfL Q �'Ieu�P I �I a SEE BOTTOM VIEW THIS SHEET NCY 29-1 a° �o a m e rm— NAB: m .B -Q9 -ll AoNSf PATH All ! lIEST LINE. ti� CLIENT NAtlE: �, y 6o NIUHARR6R PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD PATHWAY £ ° e •• ENI! -, M -� ° K = WESTSIDE - COMMONS TO PELICAN BAYY; u vI f» K z ►� m ro o y° NORTH TRAM STATION SERVICES DIVISION �. o o : m n DWwEVC TfILE:� fF 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 605 SITE, SIGN & STRIPING, PAVING, NAPLES, FL 34108 � �,,� GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN (11) g Pathway Report Pelican Bay Foundation January 23, 2012 4-q 1 q?llz r District Offices • pettyi @districtoffces.com: www.districtoffiices.com • 954- 522 -8299 ti Pathway Report Pelican Bay Foundation PUBLIC RECORD RESEARCH µr An example of the reference material included in the records search. The Pelican Bay Foundation had requested the following: i. Find documentation that the pathway along PBB is a multi -use pathway that was not intended to be restricted to just pedestrians? 2. Find when the pathway was first installed? 3. When it was last repaved (in its entirety) from The Commons to at least the North Tram Station? 1. - Multi -Use Pathway We have researched our records and have found several sources delineating the pathways intended use. The question of the pathway has been discussed frequently over the years. The findings referenced include Newspaper articles, WCI Sales Pamphlets, PBID /PBSD Minutes and DRI Annual Monitoring Reports. Material quotes have been culled to provide responses to your request. The excerpt files will be sent to you along with a printed copy of this report separately. r Newspaper References "Winding bicycle and jogging paths meander throughout the community" Naples Daily News - Thursday, Tune q, 1984 "and miles of jogging and biking paths." Naples Now - October, 1982 r ; t "There are bike paths along each roadway, and on both sides of major .'...4 arteries of traffic" The Naples Star -Money -Friday, March 13, 1981 WCI Pamphlet Reference "Both private and community tennis courts, bicycle and jogging paths, parks and nature trails are provided for the outdoor enjoyment of Pelican Bay residents." pn*.d Referelwe Fie "A pedestrian walkway and bicycle pathway system is integrated into the landscaped areas beside the roads throughout the community." "Miles of bicycle and jogging paths wind throughout the community along most major boulevards and residential neighborhoods." 2. - Pathway Installation Date The pathway was built in sections as the development grew. Beginning with the first phase and continuing throughout the project. The DRI Annual Monitoring Reports we have on file state that they were substantially completed by 1995• AM. i 4 1!f •i iw.w L. C'aw..i it it lwwlh� �Z -.it• t *1Li1 i ■tuLStas�•R 1alRYrtretr� c<,.a..:r.r.7t ► ^: irfi4liSlyuir[r t�L -ait�E 11« tlMrr3ilaYf {fir tows rn« N�i�la Matto a. N «tNry Mww Mr :. Mrs ♦t• fit. ±�r *.x OL. f x. t" D. ,.e «ir TKMMMM Brat MIA f aaxkt t iw N.. 2.1. tat hf Vta. 1.1. we Sm 1432 Oft •(A x 3. - Pathway Repavement We were able to find only one reference to the total repavement of the pathways but we have included several references to the partial repavement and the associated process for your use. Lit If sit 34ves ,iMr .r.,1[OK 40""(Aft"r"O **WAN MwYr�[.M�hilNwiit * *#W *no KTA%s tw Me. » **"^" =M aecMpwii "11r lh..+w l�.A ei..W.wN!. r e. "Mr. Archibald stated that hepassed out a copy of the sidewalk inventory. The County typically makes an annual inventory of its road system, as well as an annual inventory ofthesidewalks and bikepaths. The roadways and walkways are rated as to service life. Service life typically means the tuneframe the County needs to respond to undertake improvements Ifthere is aservice life of o -1 that means that within one year the Countyshould be out there resurfacing or repairing. Iftheservice life is 2 years then that indicates exactly what itsays, that within 12 years the County needs to beplannitig certain improvements Thtsgives the County a planning and operational tool which in the current yearshows that there are three sidewalk priorities all of which can befunded There is approximately $2o, 000 in North Naples with which to resurface sidewa&f, and ourgoal is to go ahead an complete thosefirst threeprojects in our current year, which is typically during the winter months " PBSD Minutes - February 1, 1995 PBID invoice/el Missimer b Associates J.N. Environmental Services Technical Purification, Inc. Pilot Freight Carriers Hutchison Tire ieck list presented to the Board of Supervisors: 11ellfield Monitoring - Marsh W/V Analyses - March b tabor wry Supplies 2 Drums Floton Freight Charges For Flown Tires For Fart! Courier f1 330.00 32.65 1.120.00 #67.92 66.14 Eric a. St abeam Ent. Muir bike Path - Dorchester 75.00 (Broken hater Valve) Oisplayrriter System - 012S/84 Thru 6130185 PBID Minutes - May15,1985 " PtLJCM GAx $L*VC .M OWN0 t 90AAD UUMIG ^ago" & na sorMas: rsnaNr U 3 w6 wow -a!t rto row. eay *a.. a. W aaaae A" ag na ate M tM!tMrtea tawr MMa w soh K agar r+w W *ft thvs.aa . ,cwt tytq "" triAAW "Ov tortliMl lwr 040" t� FFay Otte sraa Marta tna cwrsnMPa tr�ot[pMAPOa COMMMON boom "Mr, Turd replied yes, that was a couple of years ago and that resurfacingprogram has all been completed The County was verygood at combig m and doing that work earlier than anticipated Those sidewalks were essentially all resurfaced a couple of Years ago and now we are back into redoing them again. PBSD Minutes September i, ><ggg "Mr, Connell askecZ "Is the contract we had opened to resurface thepathways on Pelican BayBoulevardstill open':" PBSD Minutes August 2, 2oo6 Mpl— Fknda Septtmbea t, :999 LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Pelican Bay MSIBU Advisory Committee mct in Regular Session on this dac at 3:00 P.M. at the Foundation Center, 8264 Hammock Oak [hive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Ur. Alan Varlcy, Chairman ..u. Lou Vlasho, Vice Chairman Mr. Joseph Bawduniak (Absent) Mr. Thomas Brown (Absent) Mr. James Carroll (Absent) Mr. Edward Griffith (Absent) Mr. Glen Harrell (Absent) Mr. Herbert Hasson (Absent) Mr. John Hoyt Mrs. Comelia Kriegh Mm Mamm McCarthy Mr. David Roellig Mr George Watkr ALSO PRESENT: Six (6) Pelican Bay residents; Mr. Ed lischtter, Collier County Public Works Administrator, Mr. Ed Kant, Collier County Transportation Director; Deputy Scat Propper, Collier County Sbcrifrs Office: Mr. Chuck Curry, Managing Online Editor, Naples Daily News; Mr. Todd Turrell, Turrell and Associates; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA Roll Call Approval of the Minutes of the August 4, 1994 Meeting Upcoming Events Ttx Board of C.-* Cottmi —M. Public 11=rMg rot tic Pd.— Bay Sen i)nuruc Fistst Year'M) Budget is x&.h&d F. Stpetm?xr 9, 1999 a 690 P.M. at H..-. xk OA Center Community Policing Update Pelican Bay Wcb Site - (Power Plant Prescma on by Naples Daily Neas) Administrator's Report Capital Projects Street Lighting and Struct Signs Entrance Signs 1 ra kY#84'7Ri5+a^+ewe. n.rta. �w.M r., +�lS#a, ar..a7 4'a�..w�4varwrkyMar sw.. • ir.M 0 MNSn • .e! K7FSr.IRtY. Mk.?. kWuAk tMrwMS * Yoko U-4 0, fto vow ,.* 0 a, a,Msvw %*I"ka. lMF vin lm.-!oJXkar.M kkaw f °aasltb e M kwaiak fardAnk •4 - -. M'Mp klk + kk ilnakMa7Mlpkp�! Ma frsry kasika.n Ua Aarl++skrras tk i NUMkfS ,w +k gri`u � vaa.as e,k w�prruewewa,�r.r+RCSOrak.aa .+r a�m�:+«c+ xws >,w�r ..,� �.a,e.dMa. n.a xk ssaNa#ky�w - �— . � W . "W-00. N--kw "" . war9Mri� M�lkrr �r r +».+ wt.:- wpr. �M.. z�er�kM:yn:,wkassfacer,�w+spho-s Ar wewpgiMpSW+s..srvr «:�k fw�b+Y a�rre�«iaee tkaw *wrgr+ «.w... ear' Ar# rkr. t.+ rkkwshMwntrikr +�++�rs:.ai.�[3�14�wr e+s7Mkww+M*,ra wro aww� +.. wasa.k. .... ►tt.akkaeluklk�tlokiwW*%k+ war .yak Mrwkretusr.a.,,�w R'd®k �tr . a.. .a,*wa..m..�a..»:ww „w.w,ylr«.. ,wwuk.w�++.wra�ma,alrk zw,.�ewfew .akrw.a�Wp ww..A.. r�i.q#x .e4. .. u>. ti�w�Ww4+rra z9r awaa+wk.rsd e�rrma,. �c«r wwekiMgrMk�'ka?N 3. Additionally Mr. Wardstated that as a result oflastmeeting an analysis ofthe bikepath conditions has been prepared This analysis has been done in two differentscenarios with two sub - categories within each. Onescenado would be a repair of the eria&gbikepath with concrete and then to eitherreplace the ezistmg bikepaths or overlay with blacktop and concrete. This analysis includes all bikepadu in Pelican Bayand each has been wheeled offto determine the linealfeet, which is approximately 68,000linealfeetof bikepaths. ” PBSD Minutes December 7,1994 We have included a memo from the County Attorney's office pertaining to the pathways multi- use. U at,IA IA61e - I - U 1h. Mw *A" +; ft~* "im NP# X� AW to tYM L. WV I r" , MA aa.waai.�w "In the unincorporated area of Co llier County, bicyclists may use sidewalks regardless of whether there is a designated bike lane ad,/acent to apublicroadway. Section3t6.2o65(i0) and Section 316 2o65(11), Florida Statutes, govern the use ofsidewalks by bicyclists andprovides that apersonpropelkAg a bicycle upon and along a sidewalk has all the rights and duties applicable to apedestrian, arrepthe/sheshall yield the right of wayto anypedesthan and shallgive an audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian. Collier CountyMemo - April 26, 2007 N This report is intended to reflect the request for information criteria and is not intended to represent a complete synopsis of all records wherein reference to the bike paths, sidewalks or pathways occur. The research was conducted using records currently available to District Offices and was intended to provide a response within a reasonable amount of time. The documents referenced above are part of the public record and have been reproduced to reflect content only. 4a"a C O N T R A C T S t R V 1 C E 5 2000 S. Ocean Drive Suite 1705 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954) 522 -8299 www.districtoffices.com a February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 1 of 4 PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION TO: Board of Directors FROM: Dave Trecker DATE: October 30, 2003 SUBJECT: Berm Ownership Jim Carroll, Chairman of the PBSD, called Heidi Ashton, the county attorney with whom Lisa Barnett has been working in an effort to resolve the berm ownership question. Jim reported that Heidi said unequivocally that the Foundation owns the berm. Jim queried Heidi about the argument put forth by Jim Ward that, because the dyke was built with public funds, the dykelberm is owned by the county.; According to Jim, Heidi said that that had no bearing on berm ownership and that, as far as she was concerned, the Foundation owns the berm. Jim then reportedly contacted Jim Ward, told him of Heidi's position and urged Ward to accept that decision, which is in the best interests of the community. Ward apparently agreed. I feel it is unlikely that we will get any of this in writing. But with the position of a county attorney communicated to a community leader not affiliated with the Foundation, we probably have the next best thing. We owe Jim Carroll a debt of gratitude. I have prepared an article for the PB Post indicating that the Foundation, not the county, owns the berm. ,'CrV J. Trecker Copy: Kyle Kinney EDWARD K. CHEFFY BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY BOARD CERTIFIED BUSINESS LITIGATION ATTORNEY JOHN M. PASSIDOMO BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY GEORGE A. WILSON BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS & ESTATES ATTORNEY F. EDWARD JOHNSON BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS 6 ESTATES ATTORNEY JOHN D. KEHOE'. BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL ATTORNEY LOUIS D. D'AGOSTINO BOARD CERTIFIED APPELLATE PRACTICE ATTORNEY JEFF M. NOVATT DAVID A. ZULIAN February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 2 of 4 - CHEFFY PASSIDOMO WILSON & JOHNSON ATTORNEYS AT LAw, LLP 821 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 201 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 TELEPHONE: (239) 261 -9300 FAX: (239) 261 -9782 E -MAIL: CPWJ@napieslaw.com PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TO: Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. Board of Directors FROM: Lisa H. Barnett r RE: Ownership of Foundation Common Areas DATE: . April 9, 2003 KEVIN A. DENTI JEFFREY S. HOFFMAN BOARD CERTIFIED WILLS, TRUSTS & ESTATES ATTORNEY LOUIS W. CHEFFY BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY LISA H. BARNETT BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY ANDREW H. REISS WILLIAM J. DEMPSEY STANLEY A. BUNNER, JR. FRANK J. CAMPOAMOR OF COUNSEL: R. SCOTT PRICE You have asked that we review the ownership of the Pelican Bay berm, Oakmont Park, Ridgewood Park and Hammock Oak Park, and determine what rights the Pelican Bay Services District has in said properties, if any. In reaching the following opinions, we relied on ownership and encumbrance searches performed by Attorneys Title Insurance Fund. The legal descriptions searched were provided to us by the Foundation and we did not independently verify the completeness of the legal descriptions. The documents disclosed by the searches were voluminous, and in an effort to provide you with a coherent opinion, the statements of law and fact contained in this memorandum are summary in nature. Upon request, we will gladly provide you with a more detailed analysis. I. Ownership. We reviewed title to the south berm, the north berm, the berm west of St. Lucia, Hamock Oak Park, Ridgewood Park, Oakmont Park (the "Properties ") and the portion of the berm owned by Gulf Bay Land Investments, Inc., and Parcel 7 -1 Development, Inc. (the "Gulf Bay Property "). Title to the Properties was conveyed by several quit claim deeds from WCI Communities (and its predecessors in interest) to the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc., and title to the Properties appears to be vested in the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. The Properties are subject to various easements in favor of the Pelican Bay Services District (formerly the Pelican Bay Improvement District) (the "PBSD "). Although the easements are not all identical, all of the easements specifically provide that a February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 3 of 4 the easements are for drainage purposes. This includes construction and maintenance of drainage facilities. Additionally, all of the easements provide that the Grantee (i.e., PBSD) is responsible for the maintenance of the easements and, in maintaining the easements, will not interfere with the Grantor's right of ingress and egress (or the rights of ingress and egress of its successors and assigns). The easements further provide that if the Grantees or their successors fail to use the easements for the purpose intended, then the Grantee, its successors or assigns, will vacate the easement or relevant portion thereof. Some of the easements specifically provide that they are private easements between Grantors and Grantee and specifically state "neither the general public nor any purchaser of property encumbered by this easement shall acquire any right, title or interest in or to the easement area." Finally, it is worth noting that some of the easements state that the Grantor (i.e., WCI Communities or their predecessors in interest) agrees for itself and its successors and assigns that it will be responsible for any and all repairs, replacements and maintenance or restoration of improvements and landscaping, including sodding over the easement area, except for repairs and replacements required by the grantees activities. As part of our review, we also reviewed the relevant plats. Again, although the dedications in each plat differ, none of the plats contain language which would have the effect of dedicating any of the PBSD drainage easements to the public. In fact, several of the plats specifically provide; "Easements to the Pelican Bay Improvement District shown in the plat are shown merely for informational purposes and are not dedicated hereby... Neither the public nor any purchaser shall acquire any right, title or interest in or to the PBID easement areas by virtue of this plat." Based on the above, it is our opinion that title to the Properties is vested in the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc., subject to the drainage easements in favor of the PBSD, which are private easements and confer no rights on the public. H. Anal. A general principle governing all easements is that the burden upon the servient estate must not be increased to any greater extent than reasonably necessary and contemplated at the time the easement was created. Walters v. McCall, 450 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 1" DCA 1984). Where an easement specifically states the uses or purposes for which it was created, the use of the easement must be strictly confined those purposes and cannot be enlarged by any change in the use or character of the dominant estate. Id. Further, although the courts recognize that, easements carry with them an implied right to do what is necessary for the full enjoyment of the easement, that ri ght is limited and must be exercised in a reasonable manner so as not to injuriously increase the burden on the servient estate. Id. Thus, where, as here, the easements specifically state that they are for drainage purposes and maintenance of drainage facilities, the PBSD does not have right to expand the scope of the easements. Another principle of law governing easements is that an easement is distinct from the right to occupy and enjoy the land itself. It gives no title to the land on which it is imposed and is not a possessory interest. Platt v. Pietras, 382 So.2d 414 (Fla. 5d DCA 1980). Although the PBSD may February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5d. South Berm Permitting (2003 Berm Ownership Memo submitted by D. Trecker) Page 4 of 4 own the actual utility facilities placed within the easement areas, the PBSD does not have any claim to ownership of the land and cannot claim a possessory interest in the land encumbered by the easements. Also, the easements specifically prohibit the PBSD from interfering with the rights of ingress or egress of Grantor and its successors and assigns. Finally, it is our understanding that the PBSD has taken the position that it is not required to comply with the Declaration and General Protective Covenants for Pelican Bay (the 'Declaration "). Some of the easements in favor of the PBSD were recorded prior to the Declaration (copies of those easements are enclosed). The subsequent recording of the Declaration did not bind the PBSD since the PBSD does not appear to have joined in and consented to the Declaration. However, there are also easements in favor of the PBSD that were recorded subsequent to the Declaration. The Declaration contains covenants that run with the land. This means that any person or entity with any right, title or interest in the land, takes that interest subject to the Declaration once it is recorded. Although there is case law in Florida which provides that a governmental entity which takes title to real property by eminent domain is not subject to restrictive covenants, we were not able to locate case law which exempts a governmental entity with only easement rights from complying with use restrictions governing the use of real property. Based on the above, it is our opinion that the Declaration is binding on the PBSD only with regard to its rights to use the easements that were recorded subsequent to Declaration. However, regardless of whether the PBSD must comply with the Declaration, the PBSD does not have the right to expand the scope of the easements granted and any signage or improvements made by the PBSD that are not reasonably related to the use of the easements for drainage and maintenance purposes would be prohibited without the consent of the Foundation. ; , F. N% pdocs\RETebcanBayFoundazaa\Booazd orD'aectom- benn&Oak=nt.wpd 3 Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Vehicles Due from Property Appraiser Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Accrued Wages Payable Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Operating Fund 109 (Unaudited) Assets 2,410,134.30 27,761.00 $ 2,437,895.30 $ 2,437,895.30 Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 28,990.69 33,701.50 1,292,615.54 1,082,587.57 $ 62,692.19 2,375,203.11 $ 2,437,895.30 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Operating Fund 109 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Operating Revenues: Carryforward Special Assessment - Water Management Admin Special Assessment - Right of Way Beautification Special Assessment Past Due Charges for Services Surplus Property Sales Insurance Payment for Damages Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenace and Repairs IT Direct Capital IT Office Automation /Billing Hr. Indirect Cost Reimbursement Inter Payment /Mnt. Site Ins. Assessment Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage and Freight Rent Buildings and Equipment Insurance - General Printing, Binding and Copying Clerk's Recording Fees Advertising Other Office and Operating Supplies Training and Education Total Water Management Admin Operating Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense Engineering Fees Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. Landscape Materials /Replanting Program Interdepartmental Payment (Water Quality Lab) Plan Review Fees Other Contractural Services Temporary Labor Telephone Trash and Garbage Motor Pool Rental Charge Insurance - General Insurance- Auto Building Repairs & Mntc. Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Tree Triming Clothing and Uniforms $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ 666,300.00 553,029.00 555,424.10 1,907,800.00 1,583,474.00 1,590,176.45 2,603.19 1,500.00 - - Variance 2,395.10 6,702.45 2,603.19 15,300.00 5,098.00 13,532.32 8,434.32 $ 3,713,200.00 $ 3,263,901.00 $ 3,284,036.06 $ 20,135.06 $ 41,400.00 $ 14,300.00 $ 13,396.88 $ 903.12 8,800.00 - - - 400.00 100.00 100.00 - 4, 800.00 1,200.00 1,100.00 100.00 84,500.00 42,300.00 42,250.00 50.00 13,400.00 - - - 26,900.00 9,000.00 6,216.00 2,784.00 3,900.00 1,300.00 705.50 594.50 3,000.00 200.00 107.69 92.31 11,300.00 3,800.00 4,274.00 (474.00) 1,200.00 600.00 600.00 - 2,300.00 200.00 - 200.00 2,000.00 200.00 200.00 2,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 2,000.00 700.00 178.49 521.51 1,100.00 400.00 85.00 315.00 $ 209,000.00 $ 74,500.00 $ 69,013.56 $ 5,486.44 $ 132,800.00 $ 46,000.00 $ 41,861.25 $ 4,138.75 12,000.00 4,000.00 236.25 3,763.75 14,000.00 2,331.33 812.65 1,518.68 8,500.00 2,831.33 - 2,831.33 22,600.00 7,500.00 - 7,500.00 1,500.00 - - - 1,000.00 300.00 286.42 13.58 42,400.00 16,100.00 18,387.00 (2,287.00) 500.00 200.00 108.12 91.88 5,700.00 3,200.00 2,216.87 983.13 100.00 - - - 2, 300.00 1,150.00 1,150.00 900.00 450.00 450.00 1,700.00 - - - 5,400.00 1,800.00 514.79 1,285.21 8,900.00 3,000.00 888.51 2,111.49 30,000.00 10,000.00 7,488.00 2,512.00 1,100.00 500.00 634.56 (134.56) Page 1 of 3 Personal Safety Equipment Fertilizer and Herbicides Other Repairs and Maintenance Other Operating Supplies and Equipment Total Water Management Field Operating Right of Way Beautification - Operating Payroll Expense Emergency Repairs and Maintenance IT Direct Capital Office Automation Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage Rent Buildings /Equipment /Storage Insurance - General Printing, Binding and Copying Clerk's Recording Legal Advertising Office Supplies General Training and Education Total Right of Way Beautification Operating Right of Way Beautification - Field Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenance and Repairs Flood Control (Water Use & Swale /Berm Mntc.) Pest Control Landscape Incidentals Other Contractural Services Temporary Labor Telephone Electricity Trash and Garbage Rent Equipment Motor Pool Rental Charge Insurance - General Insurance - Auto Building Repairs and Maintenance Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Licenses, Permits, Training Tree Triming Clothing and Uniforms Personal Safety Equipment Fertilizer and Herbicides Landscape Maintenance Mulch /Landscape Materials Pathway Repairs Sprinkler Maintenance Painting Supplies Traffic Signs Minor Operating Equipment Other Operating Supplies Total Right of Way Beautification - Field Operating Total Operating Expenditures 500.00 200.00 491.34 (291.34) 98,400.00 28,400.00 30,073.11 (1,673.11) 1,500.00 500.00 268.75 231.25 2,500.00 2,300.00 2,830.51 (530.51) $ 394,300.00 $ 130,762.67 $ 108,698.13 $ 22,064.54 $ 42,600.00 $ 7,400.00 400.00 14,100.00 34,300.00 3,900.00 3,000.00 12,500.00 500.00 2,600.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 $ 129,300.00 $ $ 807,300.00 $ 3,300.00 89,900.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 29, 500.00 190,100.00 3,200.00 3,400.00 17,000.00 2,500.00 300.00 8,800.00 10,000.00 1,700.00 25,100.00 67,300.00 800.00 63,600.00 9,400.00 3,000.00 62,000.00 46,000.00 53,100.00 6,000.00 30,000.00 800.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 9,000.00 $ 1,556,600.00 $ $ 2,289,200.00 $ Page 2 of 3 14,700.00 $ 13,801.94 $ 898.06 100.00 100.00 - 5,700.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 - 7,723.00 (7,723.00) 1,300.00 705.50 594.50 300.00 (92.28) 392.28 4,200.00 4,617.55 (417.55) 250.00 250.00 - 200.00 - 200.00 200.00 - 200.00 200.00 - 200.00 800.00 285.31 514.69 500.00 85.00 415.00 28,450.00 $ 30,976.02 $ (2,526.02) 279,500.00 $ 32,100.00 1,700.00 800.00 9,800.00 77,400.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 5,200.00 800.00 100.00 4,400.00 5,000.00 600.00 8,400.00 22,400.00 300.00 51,200.00 2,300.00 1,000.00 20,600.00 25,300.00 23,900.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 300.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 592,300.00 $ 826,012.67 $ 255,280.61 28,868.18 800.00 154.58 14, 279.00 77,999.54 681.99 411.21 4,751.48 1,105.48 76.93 4,400.00 5,000.00 9,216.34 10,508.36 49,759.25 2,692.21 644.34 22,342.37 31,326.75 21,987.40 2,017.60 24.68 1,184.13 2,790.90 548,303.33 756,991.04 24,219.39 3,231.82 900.00 645.42 (4,479.00) (599.54) 418.01 688.79 448.52 (305.48) 23.07 600.00 (816.34) 11,891.64 300.00 1,440.75 (392.21) 355.66 (1,742.37) (6,026.75) 1,912.60 2,000.00 7,982.40 275.32 1,000.00 (184.13) 209.10 $ 43,996.67 $ 69,021.63 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations Other Machinery and Equipment General Improvements Total Water Management Field Operations Capital Right of Way Beautification - Field Autos and Trucks Other Machinery and Equipmeny Total Right of Way Beautification - Field Capital Total Capital Expenditures Total Operating Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserves (2 1/2 months for Operations) Reserves for Equipment Reserved for Attrition Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) $ 1,000.00 $ $ - $ $ 1,000.00 $ $ $ $ 102,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 1,000.00 - - $ 103,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 $ 104,000.00 $ 30,600.00 $ 27,761.00 $ 2,839.00 $ 2,393,200.00 $ 856,612.67 $ 784,752.04 $ 71,860.63 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ - 79,600.00 43,780.00 42,912.01 867.99 73,300.00 40,315.00 38,134.55 2,180.45 538,000.00 540,300.00 540,300.00 - 94,800.00 94,800.00 94,800.00 (31,700.00) (31,700.00) (31,700.00) 129,500.00 - $ 1,320,000.00 $ 1,123,995.00 $ 1,120,946.56 $ 3,048.44 $ 3,713,200.00 $ 1,980,607.67 $ 1,905,698.60 $ 74,909.07 $ - $ 1,283,293.33 $ 1,378,337.46 $ 95,044.13 Page 3 of 3 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Street Lighting Fund 778 (Unaudited) Assets - Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 480,764.10 Interest Receivable - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 480,764.10 Total Assets $ 480,764.10 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable $ - Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd 28.00 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 28.00 Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved 194,157.20 Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 286,578.90 Total Fund Balance 480,736.10 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 480,764.10 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Street Lighting Fund 778 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Operating Revenues: Ca rryfo rwa rd Curent Ad Valorem Tax Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax Insurance Claim Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense Indirect Cost Reimbursement Other Contractural Services Telephone Postage and Freight Rent Buildings /Equipment /Storage Insurance - General Office Supplies General Other Office and Operating Supplies Total Street Lighting Admin Operating Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense Emergency Maintenance & Repairs Other Contractual Services Telephone Electricity Insurance - General Insurance - Auto Building Maintenace & Repairs Fleet Maintenance and Parts Fuel and Lubricants Other Equipment Repairs Personal Safety Equipment Other Operating Supplies Electrical Contractors $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ 436,800.00 358,176.00 356,844.56 $ 15.36 $ 10,366.50 $ 4,500.00 1,485.00 4,217.41 $ 598,900.00 517,261.00 529,043.83 Variance (1,331.44) 15.36 10,366.50 2,732.41 11,782.83 $ 41,400.00 $ 14,300.00 $ 13,396.52 $ 903.48 5,300.00 $ 2,650.00 2,650.00 $ - 26,900.00 $ 8,966.67 6,216.00 $ 2,750.67 3,900.00 $ 1,300.00 540.71 $ 759.29 2,000.00 $ 200.00 107.69 $ 92.31 12,100.00 $ 4,000.00 4,470.80 $ (470.80) 300.00 $ 150.00 150.00 $ - 800.00 $ 300.00 15.36 $ 284.64 1,000.00 $ 300.00 - $ 300.00 93,700.00 32,166.67 27,547.08 4,619.59 62,500.00 21,600.00 19,732.74 1,867.26 9,600.00 - - - 800.00 200.00 - 200.00 400.00 100.00 108.12 (8.12) 44,200.00 11,100.00 8,769.00 2,331.00 800.00 400.00 400.00 - 900.00 450.00 450.00 - 1,700.00 4,300.00 1,100.00 755.02 344.98 1,200.00 300.00 106.80 193.20 200.00 100.00 - 100.00 500.00 100.00 - 100.00 64.40 (64.40) 7,300.00 3,700.00 3,899.00 (199.00) Page 1 of 2 Light Bulb Ballast Total Street Lighting Field Operating Total Field Expenditures Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery /Equipment General Improvements Total Capital Expenditures Total Operating Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserve for Future Construction Reserves (2 1/2 mos. for Operations) Reserves for Equipment Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) 12,400.00 146,800.00 240,500.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 1,312.18 41,650.00 35,597.26 73,816.67 63,144.34 1,187.82 6,052.74 10,672.33 200.00 - 200.00 1,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 241,500.00 74,016.67 63,144.34 10,872.33 13,500.00 7,155.00 7,179.74 (24.74) 8,900.00 4,895.00 - 4,895.00 228,100.00 228,100.00 228,100.00 54,900.00 54,900.00 54,900.00 - 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 - 22,000.00 - - 357,400.00 325,050.00 320,179.74 4,870.26 598,900.00 399,066.67 383,324.08 15,742.59 - 118,194.33 145,719.75 27,525.42 Page 2 of 2 Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Goods Received /Inventory Recv'd Accrued Wages Payable Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Clam Bay Fund 320 (Unaudited) Assets $ 383,534.06 383,534.06 $ 383,534.06 Liabilities and Fund Balance 3,090.00 303,213.58 77,230.48 3,090.00 380,444.06 $ 383,534.06 Operating Revenues: Carry Forward Special Assessment Special Assessment Past Due Fund 111 Transfer from Tax Collector Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees Other Contractural Services Tree Trimming Other Equipment Repairs Aerial Photography Minor Operating Other Operating Supplies Total Clam Bay Restoration Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees Other Contractual Services Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Clam Bay Fund 320 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ - 127,100.00 108,035.00 105,927.50 (2,107.50) 26.45 Property Appraiser Fees 496.47 496.47 34,000.00 - - - 75.63 939.67 939.67 700.00 400.00 458.57 58.57 $ 451,311.88 $ 397,946.88 $ 397,334.09 $ (612.79) 163,368.75 $ 70,151.60 29,000.00 349.77 7,500.00 588.01 1,000.00 271,958.13 $ 7,253.75 $ 143,000.00 Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ 150,253.75 $ Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 422,211.88 $ Non - Operating Expenditures: 54,500.00 $ 17,657.75 $ 23,400.00 7,488.00 9,700.00 - 87,600.00 $ 25,145.75 $ 100.00 $ - 1,200.00 - 1,300.00 $ - $ 88,900.00 $ 25,145.75 $ 36,842.25 15,912.00 9,700.00 62,454.25 100.00 1,200.00 1,300.00 63,754.25 Tax Collector Fees $ 3,900.00 $ 2,145.00 $ 2,118.55 $ 26.45 Property Appraiser Fees 2,600.00 1,558.00 1,482.37 75.63 Revenue Reserve 6,700.00 - - Reserves (2 1/2 month for Operations) 15,900.00 15,900.00 15,900.00 - Total Non - Operating Expenditures $ 29,100.00 $ 19,603.00 $ 19,500.92 $ 102.08 Totall Expenditures $ 451,311.88 $ 108,503.00 $ 44,646.67 $ 63,856.33 Net Profit /(Loss) $ - $ 289,443.88 $ 352,687.42 $ 63,243.54 Page 1 of 1 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet - January 27, 2012 Capital Projects Fund 322 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments Interest Receivable Due from Tax Collector Total Current Assets Total Assets $ 2,665,858.34 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts /Trade Payable Goods Received Inv. Received Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance - unreserved Excess Revenues (Expenditures) Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 110,095.49 11,612.58 2,582,848.52 (38,698.25) 2,665,858.34 $ 2,665,858.34 121,708.07 2,544,150.27 $ 2,665,858.34 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/ Budget - January 27, 2012 Capital Projects Fund 322 - FY 2012 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward Transfer from Fund 109 General Foundation Payment for Crosswalks Special Assessment Interest Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenditures: Irrigation & Landscaping Engineering Fees Lake Bank Restoration Other Contractural Services Sprinkler System Landscape Materials Licenses and Permits Traffic Signs Electrical Contractors Other Operating Supplies (Pavers) Other Road Materials Total Irrigation & Landscaping Expenditures Non - Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees Property Appraiser Fees Reserve for Contingencies Revenue Reserve Total Non - Operating Expenditures: Total Expenditures Net Profit /(Loss) $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ - 436,500.00 436,500.00 436,500.00 - - - 53,487.00 53,487.00 331,900.00 278,796.00 276,574.45 (2,221.55) 19,500.00 6,435.00 16,297.74 9,862.74 $ 3,341,284.04 $ 3,275,115.04 $ 3,336,243.23 $ 61,128.19 $ 132,154.37 $ 44,051.46 $ 9,387.15 $ 34,664.31 85,000.00 - - - 2,978,637.97 992,879.32 421,457.07 571,422.25 4,164.19 (4,164.19) 43,031.00 (43,031.00) 17,500.00 1,000.00 (1,000.00) 50,000.00 - - - $ 7,004.18 (7,004.18) 39,568.70 39,568.70 38,553.60 1,015.10 21,323.00 - - - $ 3,306,684.04 $ 1,076,499.48 $ 524,597.19 $ 551,902.29 $ 10,300.00 $ 6,180.00 $ 5,531.53 $ 648.47 6,800.00 4,080.00 3,896.51 183.49 17,500.00 - - - $ 34,600.00 $ 10,260.00 $ 9,428.04 $ 831.96 $ 3,341,284.04 $ 1,086,759.48 $ 534,025.23 $ 552,734.25 $ - $ 2,188,355.56 $ 2,802,218.00 $ 613,862.44 Page 1 of 1 February 1, 2012 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 11. Miscellaneous Correspondence (submitted by S. O'Brien) re: Survey Page 1 of 1 From: Susan O "Brien To: ResnickLisa Subject: pathway widening, etc. Date: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:57:44 AM Hi Lisa, I would appreciate your distributing this to the other directors as a one -way communication. I talked with Stephen Birnkrant at Amplitutude Research, Inc. in Boca Raton, FL to get a ballpark cost estimate of a questionnaire on topics of interest to the PBSD, e.g. widening /repairs to pathways; bike lanes on PBB; funding for resurfacing PBB; doing additional crosswalks and landscape upgrades; and lighting upgrades, etc. He said if we have a number of different topics in the questionnaire, then doing a written survey (versus a telephone survey) is needed. With about 6500 units, he would mail 1000 surveys randomly. Cost would range from about $5500 to compile the data gleaned from the questionnaire results to about $8000 which would include a longer narrative of the questionnaire results. The time from the day the Board decided to do the survey until the Board has the survey results would range from about 6 to 8 weeks. If the time to finalize the questions on the survey is limited to about 2 weeks, then the Board could have the questionnaire data in about 6 weeks. I found Amplitude Research via a google search. I realize this company is one of thousands that does questionnaires, but it does give us a starting point with some basic information. Susan O'Brien CLAM BAY MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT MANGROVE MONITORING REPORT BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR: THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION DECEMBER 201 1 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biblogical Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Introduction The Clam Bay estuarine system is a 570 -acre area of sandy beaches, shallow bays, seagrass beds and mangrove forests on the coast of Collier County in southwest Florida. The community of Pelican Bay abuts the northern and eastern edges of the system, while the Seagate and Naples Cay communities abut the southern portion of the system. The Clam Bay estuarine system is an important natural and recreational resource for local residents and visitors. Clam Bay was designated a Natural Resource Protection Area by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County in 1994 (Collier County, 1994) and consists of approximately 420 acres of mangroves and some 115 acres of shallow, open water bays, as well as a 35 acre beachfront parcel (Clam Pass Beach Park). The system consists of three primary bays; Outer Clam Bay (southernmost), Inner Clam Bay (central), and Upper Clam Bay (northernmost), connected by a series of tidal creeks. The entire system receives runoff from adjacent upland and wetland areas. Upper Clam Bay is connected to Inner Clam Bay by a winding narrow creek. Inner Clam Bay is connected to Clam Pass through another narrow creek. Outer Clam Bay is connected to the Gulf of Mexico by a wider creek through Clam Pass. Some water also flows south to Doctor's pass through the culverts under Seagate Drive. Clam Pass is a small, marginally stable inlet that has migrated north and south along the shore over the years. Prior to dredging, average water depths were -2.5' to -1.0' with a width of 30 -50' (Collier County, 1994). The Pass remains the primary source of tidal exchange for the Clam Bay system, but it is restricted by sediment deposits just inside the pass and in the long meandering tidal creeks surrounded by mangrove forests. The smaller embayments located primarily to the north of the pass are not subject to normal tidal exchange except during exceptionally high tides. Tidal range is restricted throughout the Clam Bay system ( Turrell 1995; Tackney 1996). Clam-Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 The system is bounded on the north by Vanderbilt Beach Road, to the south by Seagate Drive, to the east by the Pelican Bay development and to the west by the Gulf of Mexico. Pelican Bay is predominately a residential community of private single - family homes, as well as both high and low -rise condominium units. The community also includes a golf course, common areas with meeting rooms, tennis courts, beach park facilities, emergency services facilities, and commercial areas with shopping and hotels. The 2,104 -acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in 1977 as a partnership between Collier Enterprises and Westinghouse Communities. It was one of the first developments in Florida required to save fragile coastal wetlands and associated ecosystems (Urban Land Institute, 1981). The development of Pelican Bay had a limited impact on the wetlands themselves (approximately 94 acres in total with about 78 of those acres located in the northwestern corner of the property) leaving the mangrove forest intact and preserved around the bays. In 1992 a small area of dead black mangroves was first observed in the northern part of the system. In 1995 a significant area (approximately 50 acres) of dead and dying mangroves was reported ( Turrell, 1996). Following the die -off, restorative dredging was proposed to increase tidal flushing by opening up the pass and widening several tidal creeks within the system. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (permit #0128463- 001 -JC) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (permit #199602789 (IP -CC)), authorized restoration activities in the Clam Bay system, in an effort to restore the mangrove communities that had died off. The restoration activities permitted by state and federal agency permits required a suite of monitoring activities to assess effects of the work efforts. Those permits expired in 2009 however, the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD), in an effort to remain informed of the condition of the system, and vigilant in their protection of it, pursued new permits in order to continue the maintenance of the flushing channels within the forest areas. Permits were granted by DEP (permit #11- 0128463 -005) and ACOE (permit #1996 - 02789) authorizing this activity. Like the previous permits, the new permits require annual monitoring of mangrove and other components within the system. This document presents a summary of the mangrove and seagrass monitoring which has taken place within this past year. Mangrove Monitoring Methodology The mangrove monitoring undertaken this year was a continuation of monitoring which was initiated under the old permits. The eleven existing Turrell, Hall monitoring plots and the eight existing Lewis mangrove plots were observed. The previously established monitoring procedures were conducted. These included documenting the number and species of trees within the plot, as well as their approximate height. Each monitoring plot is a measured l Om x l Om square staked at each corner and marked in the center with a labeled PVC piping. Monitoring activities included enumeration and mapping of living and dead trees with diameters at breast height (DBH) recorded for all living trees with a DBH greater than 2.5cm. Seedlings were identified by species and numbers were estimated by count or percent cover (where high numbers make individual enumeration difficult). In 2003, each measured tree was tagged and identified with a plot specific number to allow for easier tracking of individual trees as well as to allow easier comparisons over time. Any saplings that grow to sufficient size ( >2.5cm DBH) between monitoring events are added to the tree counts and Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 receive tags and numbers as well. Photographs were taken and any additional observations, including standing water, wildlife or signs of stress are noted. Time, tide, and prevailing weather conditions were also noted for each survey. Meandering transects were walked throughout the system to inspect stressed areas or to observe areas of concern related by residents of the community or identified through examination of aerial photographs. These surveys are conducted throughout the year as needed. Observations made during these pedestrian transects are noted in the general biological discussion of this report. A photographic timeline was also initiated this past year. Concerns expressed by residents led to the establishment of photo points on the roofs of two condominium buildings adjacent to the mangrove area. Quarterly photos are taken from fixed positions on the roof of the Montenero and the Grovesnor condominium buildings. Over time, comparisons can be made of the photographs to determine if any additional die -off or gradual changes are occurring. Each year, scale rectified aerial photographs are taken of the Clam Bay System by Aerial Cartographics of America. The aerials are produced at 200 -scale in both color and infrared versions. These annual photos can then used to compare recovery and die -off areas for the annual reports. Mangrove Monitoring Results A summary of the 19 monitoring plots have been included on the following pages. Plot discussions, comparative photographs, and tree compositions have been included on each individual plot page. i.i O 0. a •r 0 0 O s. O Q � bq cd Cv h •r C% h O L y UQOFA U N O .� r~ •� N > v� "C O .� �! c`dd -4-3 cd Cd 7013 O o 4) ~ q p p N15. 4. p. cd O > O+" U U a a > o -d Cd tb� r- S � - .� 0 C's cis bA O cn to 0 0 x" ° O 0 a E U U O E O U Ln O ' ' O LO r r N In n ❑ ■ ❑ O 0 O Lo O O LO co N N saga; anil 10 jagwnN N Y d co V ca � Fn Q m O N _O O N k A � \ 2 / / 2 \ / 2 ` 2 k as _ ./ •/ § m 2 � 0 /\§\ t \ t \� £\ Ggwo c K ') § § In, § ol � ± & 2 -1:1 o \ / § t ) 7 k § o / / § 0 o / o k ( 2 § ƒ C,3 3 ® % (A o o c ) >1 1) � / \ § k § 3 § k � E § /° § LO \ o 6 m � � w a n ■ O $ < \ � 0*4 I f co : 3 < 0) � � $ \ \ & — — m o sa;a|| 10 jogwnN 3 q � q O a a 0 0 O Y. a+ � e an b Q R cC y O L N to UQCFA :y E .. U O E O O U In O ' ' O U 04 A ■ ■ ❑ M M N N O saga; aniI jo aagwnN L Y d U V CO O m a U) a) Q_ O N 0 0 N o c > abi o In 0 Obi`�E~ o b 3 0 a U U U nag 23 0 > `n U O O b ��. vi = w y^ N TJ U +' p ,O O t 3 0 w cts Cd M ~' U'v CL4 y U'D'C N O O 4 p'C a 'o ff &; 4 U O r� U 415, +^ O• r N U o :° U b O O }+ p O U M ti U ou v y v U p p 0 r'' O ¢, ��, O O U 0 "N r. r. =0 -a � w t = _ v, F. •'" > ti v� • .-. ¢� 'C O H .t= O t8 ti r� 2 C S, O Q. :y E .. U O E O O U In O ' ' O U 04 A ■ ■ ❑ M M N N O saga; aniI jo aagwnN L Y d U V CO O m a U) a) Q_ O N 0 0 N O 0. a 0 0 q bA � U H y � � y h u W 0- C1 0 > U o � d � z 0 cd pUq 'b U .d N }0}..� c 0 d b U� �i C O O D Jb N U U } v Cd V U U O p s O b O U $14 .- -- b N U b U¢ } �+ 4r 1•+ �-+ N i O O tv b bA ¢' N O - U U O d4 .� 04 � 0 r. ti � � � � � U O U" —C,3 '. cd U U O v 0 a E E U O E O U U O � ' O CV L6 n ■ ■ o O LO O LO O U) O M N N saaal ani-I 10 aagwnN N L N Y N U V co m Q 12 HE O N O O N a+ i. O G. d bA C O Y O 0 e L". bA cC t3 r� I� bpy CC N C y U W F A Y I W, O a �I. 'o y vi � h 4.4 � iC N Z A-' O N 3 0 0 X, o 0 0 i� o, � p O -55 'C B .t"r � � � •'" � � fir" � 3 .� o y V� cd 3 0 O cd h cd o to CA O N .d � O cn y �1 M c ;$ vi v 1: 4. on u a �i a 6 i 9 o� o a `i o H 4M J.-= o~� a - A R o E L) L) O E O U LO O ' ' O N A ® ■ ❑ O LO O LO O O LO Cl) N N SOGJ; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N r-• U m Fn N d m CL 0 N Q N k A � 2 / / � \ � / / 2 / \ ■ § m A d /\§\ \� a\ ®f68 G7@Q \ § f ° k ] R 3 \ q ƒ k 2 q\ 2 2 0 ) § E § &`§ § #w7_AA q ct \ Ln 7 \0 'n ?3 o Q > k \ / � k 2 e c \ § ® § 0 .§ q) \ 7 7 2 ,§ § ) A k k 2 A « § '- 0 � o n 7 ( C) qA ] cn n o / ƒ § ƒ + d E § /o § LO \ o � � a Lq w a n ■ ■ O [.�. e � 7 � 4 ! to CD I � � E � 2 � ... � cn \ q 2 / E o sa;aII; agwnN 3 q � M i. O a a 0 a 0 0 L a on ro u y h O � N bio UWEFA 0 a E U O E O U U' O ' ' O U� r N N 0 ■ ❑ CO - " O 00 O It N O saga; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N L En U 'V co d m a cn 12 0 N 0 0 N o o 4, crj a c's .� U .' c 'D Q cd i. .� F� W � bOOiD r �, 4. c a0i cl 3 p° c r a b o �+ w> C-13 604 o a� c"d Vim] .�.+ 0 0 Qr '0 0 a E U O E O U U' O ' ' O U� r N N 0 ■ ❑ CO - " O 00 O It N O saga; OAIJ 10 aagwnN N L En U 'V co d m a cn 12 0 N 0 0 N O a 0 0 0 a � �V •Y y rn L. O :o RI N ti o w � U W H A 44 * - N O >., p - �v bA N EL O .� O 4) '� 3 0 > Q+ O bA .b 0 +� H v > .. ti � "C y b 3 -d 3 a) 'b N cc cd ^� = U p vpi 00 I-, `a >, CO > .� ouov000wc p Az, 7� O cd w _O R3 3 Cd O . �, r3 O W O cud, "C O 0 cd O O csa ,b -0 y 0 �j C� U . F" Q" U b O O E " O E O U LO O ' O Lq r N L6 n L i co w o m Q O to O T O O LO M N N saaJ; oniI 10 jogwnN O N 0 0 N O LL a 0 0 O �s E on ca u h b i O d' C� N ti U�F�1 to G) 44: O O O vj >O _ 0 C,3 y rA 0 Ed O � Z O O U N u N 4. p O cd E U L) O E O o v ui o o CV LO A 0 m 13 O >L N CL Y 4) C) Fm c- U) O N N LO O LO O saai; aniI jo aagwnN a O N O O N k k / k 2 / � \ / 2 ` 2 k §� § as }\k- §\ § \ § ( SgwQ ƒ o � to � r. u ± § & § 3 / .) w•2 u 7 § [ ©/ C13 «) \ ° / m ' © ] = R = b 2 q t u .) ƒ �,§ '§ / �.§ & r / c' § o A 2 >1 2 o § En } \ k % § \ \ k § \ & U O 2 — / En v 2 0 A b R o cl ) > § 2 u / cd lu § \ ) ƒ / ƒ p 0 U Ln �. .ƒk k 3 q � q E § /o § / LO o . , 6 U� - w a n ■ ■ ❑ � ± Q i o ( 2 0 % $ m a � 2 � ± 2 2 m Co 2$ 9%\\ k salaII jo agwnN 3 q � q i O a a 0 0 0 en Q C Oq cCpd ci ed � y b+ y to O L � U W H A E C) U O E O U U' O ' ' O Uf r N U� n m ■ O a� >L o Y IL 0 CD Q Cl) i C) LO o o Lo O Cl) N N saaJ; aniI ;o aagwnN O N 0 0 N ° a� ° 00 0 c �O o rA,0 0 �O p 01 ° b oy a" Ed °' � o Q) 0 y' a ° $ .� 04 o 3 ° o r' c ° o -� b ol O � � � � • � 'C � � bA ti � �• �i�y-i �, �• p N V �"� U y �. "o o c c� C ° cd 9 03 o U E C) U O E O U U' O ' ' O Uf r N U� n m ■ O a� >L o Y IL 0 CD Q Cl) i C) LO o o Lo O Cl) N N saaJ; aniI ;o aagwnN O N 0 0 N 0 � : � g *4 k A 7 \ \ 2 / 2 / k / \ 2 � \ � % $f§ m2a / \2\ \Z\ E � f _ k w / 7 � � o 0 2 � ' s � . � i R 2 2 9 \ ° s|■eo1aJJL 2 � \ _ o •2 3 � 2 03 © R / 3 §&� ƒ+ § % cs f / � / ) j'� § � § q o � f _ k w / 7 � � o 0 2 � ' s � . � i R 2 2 9 \ ° s|■eo1aJJL 0 a a a en 0 0 0 c Cd U c h .b 40 ca Z bq CU Cd O Q R N O ice. N U4E-(� i Y i m d CL a� H o N { L p ` c a f0 N O 00 (O 't N O r r r r sle4ol aajl o "" o ° 4. ° o > •y ° o +' ~ > O O O O }}>.. cd — O v U U -0 O cn t4l C H O O U O •.. i Y i m d CL a� H o N { L p ` c a f0 N O 00 (O 't N O r r r r sle4ol aajl Yr O a 0 0 0 � u O d' o ct x O 1z+ E UWF-C1 O O � U 3 a 9) m i C. O > O CD d > M N 0 O ct U (9 m i C. CD d > M 0 O � a � � 7D Q) O� N O O O N r 000 M M M 1e ;01 aaJl k A / � / / / 2 \ / 2 / \ ■ & %2a ƒ /�/ \� �( G¥@o � % a � 3 7 2 � 2 I � E E co 9 \ ° Sleol a j.L %nz _ •g « + _w q � •2 ° � � k j / § j E \ 2 •§ 'c § © � / & > 2 § -0 / % � k � 0 ci3 � � % a � 3 7 2 � 2 I � E E co 9 \ ° Sleol a j.L 0 a a en c 0 c 0 0 lC U � h h y O Q O ca x UWF�C� I I � m m Q � d > LO o O = IL i I N L M N O O SIBIO.L Gail ° 4. o > � > � v O c r kn U p 4-. a m U � I I � m m Q � d > LO o O = IL i I N L M N O O SIBIO.L Gail k & / / ■ k / � \ � \ / 2 � 2 k m 2 Q ƒ \2\ t \ * t \mot\ \ /d\ � f � 3 � I k / 7 0 7 � I � � / \ \ 2 / m o s|■eolaj.L « g � � •/ � k ) . nzj%Q)\ /+ � C) § % V U — ) &� c = = A 7� o « o \ � § « LZ ) � c Ln o ® u ) � � f � 3 � I k / 7 0 7 � I � � / \ \ 2 / m o s|■eolaj.L k � / \ \ 2 / 2 \ k / \ 2 � 2 k [ * § \ {Q �kkm § /§( Sgwo 7 § •� — g 2 / » c . ƒ 0 $ % ° § \ ƒ Q) 3 C) § ƒ 0 0 § U / � o « E ° § ƒ f . Co > _ k ® c £ 7 m � / LO o m o m o m o r o M n q q _ — s|■eo1aj.L iyr O 0. 6J a 0 0 O (C U Cd f� FH Cd O d' O cl x O ice. N U W F-o C� Y U (0 m r o �, v1 C j � C CL O O O O O O O O N O w (o N N r r r sIe;ol Gail -cs °' o���� cr a 0 =s cl -mod >0 ° � ct cl 0 -0 cl c� O W) Q �s U O p O O Q, --Co's U) ., O H E O Y U (0 m r o �, v1 C j � C CL O O O O O O O O N O w (o N N r r r sIe;ol Gail Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Condominium Roof Photos Montenero Roof July 2011 Montenero Roof October 2011 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Grovesnor Roof January 2011 Grovesnor Roof October 2011 Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Another issue that arose this year was the presence of a boring beetle attacking stressed trees in the early months of the year. Observations within the system and research into the life habits of many boring beetles led to the conclusion that white mangroves affected by the sustained cold temperatures in December 2010 and January 2011 were most susceptible to the beetle attack. Cold stress reduced the abilities of these trees to fight off the boring activities and many trees succumbed to them. Yellowing leaves, leaf drop, and eventual death of the tree was the result. Efforts were made to identify the beetle but since no adults were collected, it was not possible to identify the culprit down to the species level though it was narrowed down to some type of a flat- headed borer (Metallic beetles). Continued vigilance will be maintained to see if additional infestation occurs in healthy trees instead of just the already stressed ones. Borer damage to stressed tree Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Seagrass Monitoring Methodology Seagrasses are a valuable biotic indicator of environmental health and the PBSD has recognized the value in maintaining viable conditions for seagrass growth. The original permitted dredging design - entailed impacts to seagrasses within the channel between Outer Clam Bay and Clam Pass. Monitoring over the life of the permit was designed to allow documentation of the regeneration or loss of seagrasses within the system and follow the effect of increased tidal flushing on seagrass aerial coverage and density within the potentially affected beds. These monitoring practices have continued in order to further document the overall health of the Clam Bay system. Monitoring methods include examination of aerial photographs and ground truthing by in -water and wading surveys. Accurate estimation of seagrass coverage is primarily hampered by visibility. The type of seagrass and limited visibility make estimation through examination of aerial photographs almost impossible. The most effective survey technique has been diving and wading transects and the most effective time has been at low tides when shallow water and substrate exposure make coverage estimation easier. Best effort was made to overcome the visibility obstacles in those areas that were deeper. Due to the ephemeral nature of the grasses being monitored, the survey methodology has been slightly modified from what was originally permitted in the 1998 permits. It was noted early on that the seagrasses shifted in location from year to year and that fixed quadrats in the same location year after year did not accurately depict seagrass coverage or presence within the Bay. More general observations of the presence of grasses along these transects have been used to locate the grass beds with the quadrat measurements used to quantify coverage within those areas where grasses are found. Grass beds in or adjacent to the transects are then mapped with a handheld GPS unit (Garmin 76c) and transferred to an aerial exhibit. Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Seagrass Results Outer Clam Bay: Transect 1 Transect one was surveyed with a surface supplied air source and snorkeling gear in water depths from 2 to 3 ft. Visibility was approximately 8 -10 inches and was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. Halodule beaudettei (Shoal grass) was found within quadrats 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, of this Transect. The general area of grasses along this tansect remained consistent with last couple of years and has expanded slightly from the original pre- dredging monitoring. Densities of grasses was higher in some areas and lower in others but overall was generally consistent with last years results. In addition to the grasses, oysters (Crassostrea virginica) were also observed along the mangrove fringe line. Oyster clumps (approximately 6 inches by 6 inches), upside- down jellyfish (Cassiopeia xamachana), lightning whelks (Busycon contrarium), fighting conchs (Strombus alatus), shell debris, and red, green and brown algae ( Rhodophyta, Chlorophyta, and Phaeophyta) were also observed along Transects 1. Transect 1 45% 0 0 40% 35% 30% 25% o 25% 20% 20% 15% v 15% a 10% 5% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Shoal Grass (Halodule beaudettei)(formerly H. wrightii) Lightning Whelk (Busycon contrarium) (Transect 1) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Outer Clam Bay: Transect 2 Transect two was also surveyed via snorkeling gear and wading. Water depths ranged from 1 to 3 ft. with visibility approximately 6 -12 inches but like Transect 1 this was easily reduced if sediments from the bottom were stirred up. A small area of Shoal Grass (Halodule beaudettei) was observed along this transect between quadrats 1, 2, and 3. The density of this grass was very sparse (maximum 10% coverage) and was mixed in with some Caulerpa algae. Caulerpa was also observed in other areas along this transect and throughout the system. Transect 2 12% - - - -- _ ..— - — — 10% e 10% 8% U 6% 5% 5% C 4% L d CL 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Outer Clam Bay: southwest sector, transect 3 Transect 3 was surveyed with mask and snorkel gear. Water depths ranged from approximately 10 to 22 inches. Visibility varied between 2 and 6 feet. A small patch of turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum) was observed along the western mangrove fringe line. This patch has been observed in the same location for the past several years though it has not appreciably increased in size. The patch is very small and consists only of about 15 to 20 erect shoots with 1 to 5 leaf blades each. The extent of the rhizomes was not explored for fear of disturbing the bed. In addition to the grass, both blue -green and red algae were present within the shallows. There was also a lot of Caulerpa present in and around this transect area. Other observations made along this transect included the Florida fighting conch, upside -down jellyfish and a few scattered oysters right along the fringe line of the mangroves. Transect 3 3% 2% 2% > 2% 0 V 1% 1% fl 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -7) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Western side of waterway between pass and bay, Transect 4 Transect 4 was surveyed by both wading and snorkeling due to the varying water depths. Water depths ranged from 1 to 6 ft. with visibility of approximately 12 to 24 inches. The survey was conducted during the flood tide and the incoming current was quite strong. Large amounts of shell and vegetation debris was encountered drifting with the current along the bottom. Small patches of Shoal grass (Halodule wrightii) were observed along the western mangrove fringe line. Oysters were once again observed along the mangrove fringes on both east and west sides of the channel. Blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus), southern hard clams (Mercenaria campechiensis), and lightning whelks (Busycon contrarium) were observed scattered throughout this transect. Several fish species such as mangrove snapper (Lu janusgriseus), mullet (Mugil cephalus), and sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus) were also observed. 60% Transect 4 - -- 50% 0 50% 40% U 30% 25% 25% c v 20% a 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quadrat Numbers (1 -9) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Shoal grass (Halodule beaudettei) Southern hard clam (Mercenaria campechiensis) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Western side of waterway between pass and bav Transect 5 Transect 5 was surveyed by both wading and snorkeling due to the same varying water depths as transect 4 has. Depths ranged from exposed substrate inches to 30 inches. In the original monitoring efforts, both shoal grass and paddle grass had been observed along this transect. As the tidal prism changed with the dredging activities, areas where grass had been present became subjected to longer periods of exposure and so died out. Shoal grass (Halodule beaudettei) was again observed along this transect. Small amounts were scattered throughout quadrat 3, 4, 5 and 7 along the channel edges in areas that were not exposed at low tide. Black mangrove pneumatophores and algal patches were also observed across this transect. Mud snails were observed throughout the transect and Florida fighting conchs were seen scattered throughout the area. Further continued monitoring will indicate if the return is permanent or not. Transect 5 80% -- Z5% 70% I 60% L 50% 50% 40% U 40% 30% 20% a ° 10 /o 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% a 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quadrat Numbers (1 -9) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Inner Pass, shoal area east of Clam Pass Transect 6 Transect 6 is oriented north to south and covers a large portion of the shoal area just east of the Pass. This transect was surveyed by wading on account of the very shallow water depths which ranged from exposed substrate to approximately 4 inches. Visibility was not impaired. Large amounts of shoal grass were observed once again in the vicinity of the two mangrove islands, around quadrats 2 and 3, and quadrats 4 through 6. The two beds present are in the same locations as last year though the density of coverage has shifted. The southern bed is sparser than it was last year while the northern bed is denser. The main change in coverage on this transect from the original monitoring conducted during the first annual report is that the grasses seem to have shifted more towards the center and away from the perimeter of the transect. Densities seem to be consistent with earlier surveys. Remaining portions of this transect consist of a sandy sediment with green mat algae, mud snails, and Florida fighting conchs. Trasect 6 60% 50% 50% 0 50% 40% 40% V 30% 25% v 20% 15% L li 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Quadrat Numbers (1 -8) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Inner Pass, shoal area east of Clam Pass Transect 7 Transect 7 is oriented northeast to southwest and covers a large portion of the shoal area just east of the Pass. This transect was like T6 was surveyed by wading on account of the very shallow water depths which ranged from exposed substrate to approximately 4 inches. Visibility was not impaired. Large amounts of shoal grass were observed once again in the vicinity of the two mangrove islands, around quadrats 3 through 5. The two beds present are in the same locations as last ear though the density of coverage has shifted. The southern bed is sparser than it was last year while the northern bed is denser. The main change in coverage on this transect from the original monitoring conducted during the first annual report is that the grasses seem to have shifted more towards the center and away from the perimeter of the transect. Densities seem to be consistent with earlier surveys. Remaining portions of this transect consist of a sandy sediment with green mat algae, mud snails, and Florida fighting conchs. Trasect 7 60% -- - - - - -- 50% 50% —50% 40% 40% �j 30% r C 20% 15% L a 10% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) Clam Bay Restoration and Management Biological Monitoring Tu[rell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Inner Pass, southern section of channel and shoal area Transect 8 Like Transect 7 Transect 8 is oriented northeast to southwest and crosses both the channel and the shoal area. The survey of this tansect was conducted by both wading and snorkeling the survey line. Water depths ranged from 2 inches to 4 feet with a visibility approximately 2 to 3 feet in the deeper portion of the channel. Shoal grass was observed on the east side of the channel in the shallower water depths. This grass bed has decreased slightly and shifted to the west since the original monitoring efforts. The small patch of shoal grass observed two years ago on the west side of the channel has not returned, most likely due to sand build- up allowing this area to dry out during low tides. Densities have increased from the 10% to 25% coverage seen last year to around 10% to 45 %. The current densities are consistent with what was observed during the first annual report. Large groups of mud snails, a few Florida fighting conchs, and small patches of algae were also observed. 45% Trasect 8 40% 0 0 35% 30% 30% 25% o 25% 20% v 15% 10% 10% CL 5% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quadrat Numbers (1 -6) Clam Bay Restoration and Management biological Monitoring Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Seagrass Conclusions Seagrass coverage within the Clam Bay system appears to have decreased since the surveys conducted immediately prior to the dredging in 1998. What has been shown by the past twelve years monitoring is that there was a decrease in the monitored seagrass beds immediately following the initial (1999) dredging activities. This decrease appears to have stabilized around 2004 or 2005 and has reversed in the past few years to where the grass beds are re- establishing previous areas and new areas appropriate for the grasses (in terms of water depths and light penetration) are being colonized. Future monitoring of the seagrasses will be conducted to see if this trend continues. Water Loggers Three continuous water level monitoring loggers were deployed in the system this year. These instruments help us to see how water levels within the mangrove forest react to tides and storm events. The graph below shows the water levels within the forest in comparison to the rainfall recorded within Pelican Bay during the same time period. 6 4 x -Y' 3 3 2 0 6/25/2011 Clam Bay Water Level Vs. Rainfall 7/25/2011 8/25/2011 9/25/2011 10/25/2011 5.00 North 4.50 -South Plot 7 4.00 - Rainfall 3.50 3.00 c 2.50 .q tY. 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 The fluctuations in levels depicted shows that the system does receive elevated water levels after heavy rainfall events but quickly returns to normal levels. This is an indication that the water flow and flushing capacity of the system is still functional. Clam Bay Restoration and Management hiological Monitoring Turxell, Hall & Associates, Inc.: Mangrove Monitoring Report December 2011 Tide Gauges The tidal data and flushing analysis for the bays and main waterways within the system will be presented under separate cover. There were some equipment problems with the gauges which resulted in bad /unusable data. Additional data collection is underway and this report will be presented when it is completed. Water Quality Testing The water quality sampling and data analysis is presented under separate cover. Water quality sampling is conducted within the Clam Bay system on a monthly basis. Water quality samples are collected by PBSD staff and transported to the Collier County Pollution Control laboratory for processing. Of the parameters sampled and collected, dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrates (NOA orthophosphates (OPO4), total dissolved solids (TDS), and chlorophyll -a are discussed. Discussion on these parameters is provided because they are the most indicative of nutrient loading and other potential water quality problems. Additional sampling information was recently provided and is being incorporated into the summary report which will be submitted when this additional data has been fully incorporated. Conclusions Since the final original permit required monitoring report in 2008, the past restoration activities have continued to yield positive results within the mangrove forest of Clam Bay. The majority of the monitoring plots show continued increases in mangrove numbers and sizes. Two plots (Plots 4 and 9) have been consistently hampered by exotic vegetation and very dense ground cover growth. Ongoing exotic eradication activities will allow for the eventual re- establishment of natural native vegetative community within these areas. Borer damage is being monitored to determine if it was an isolated outbreak or an ongoing issue. Continued vigilance will be maintained to see if additional infestation occurs in healthy trees instead of just the already stressed ones. Continued annual inspection of the flushing cuts throughout the system will be continued. These cuts are vital to the continued health of the system and must be maintained so that the water flows and flushing capabilities of the main waterways is protected. This years monitoring has shown that the system continues to recover and both mangrove and seagrass recruitment have been documented. While the success of work efforts to date is undeniable, continued vigilance is called for to maintain a viable functioning ecosystem at Clam Bay. Stress in mangrove forest areas is still apparent, although in several areas this may still be attributable to storm or cold damage. The spectacular recruitment of white mangrove seedlings, now 8 to 10 feet tall saplings, throughout the original die -off area is testament to the efforts undertaken with the initial dredging and that work can be considered a success. Q 0 0 J LL U. W Q N z -aXF ►� Clam x. �a Q z U QV LU � o f � 6 N¢ 6 1 W Q � Y o .,r. H U 1 \9845 -MR- DIE -OFF REPORT.dwg LOCATION MAP 2/12012 RANDI.JONES Ia LL J O U J LL W 71 U J z 0 ww a� Z 0 a f- 00 z_ D F- gz wOU aW W0 O LL b1 b1 LL o v� iro -� Qz zo . FN a0 z? z3 �~ �z w z 0 L uJ Q O Q U) O Z F�a g° O v v v W N N W z d I co Y o o Z ❑ m W m O Z I g � i w T W U O p U O' N N O U8 O J J V �y� M o o U of x d � z cC s o U L k 0. W V W M E 0 %mow Z N a l �L a \ J t t 1 7 C� w 00 ►°n o° Ln v C _ s .r v l0 (ul) Ile; idea Li o° Ui °o (Y) ('ri nj ry O 00 0 °o 14 e I O 0 Ln 0 N Ln N e\-4 r-1 r-1 O Ln N N I � O N Ln 01 rl Ln ri O Ln N 00 ti ri O N Ln N n Ct M N e.� O N l\D (4) JSAVJ is4eM l �L a \ J t t 1 7 C� C _ s .r Ln 0 N Ln N e\-4 r-1 r-1 O Ln N N I � O N Ln 01 rl Ln ri O Ln N 00 ti ri O N Ln N n Ct M N e.� O N l\D (4) JSAVJ is4eM