The URL can be used to link to this page

PBSD MSTBU Agenda 12/07/2011 R PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 0 /n31" Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNERXV;•DfCEMfl WY,2011 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7 AT 1:00 PM, AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, LOCATED AT 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108. AGENDA The agenda includes, but is not limited: Fiala till @r 1. Pledge of Allegiance Henning 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes a. October 26, 2011 Clam Bay& Landscape Water Management Subcommittees b. November 2,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5. Administrator's Report a. Community Crosswalks b. All-Way Stop at Pelican Bay Boulevard and Ridgewood Drive c. Pelican Bay Boulevard Pathways d. South Berm Restoration Project Status e. Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status f. Community Landscaping g. Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach h. Monthly Financial Report 6. Chairman's Report Misc.Cares: a. Clam Bay Update b. Committee Assignments Date: '1 31i c. Announcements Z Z 6 7. Committee Reports Its ' � 8. Old Business Copies to: 9. New Business a. Our Health in Pelican Bay(M.A. Womble) b. Pelican Bay Services Division Office Space in Proposed Community Center Addition (S. O'Brien) c. Announcements 10. Audience Comments 11. Miscellaneous Correspondence 12. Adjournment ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO,AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE, WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT(239)597-1749. 12/2/2011 1:34:09 PM December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5c. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Pathways-J.Chandler's Comments Page 1 of 1 ResnickLisa Subject: 12/7 I 5c. J. Chandler's Comments re: Pelican Bay Boulevard Pathways(Widening) Project From: John Chandler Imailto:johnchandler219@cimail.coml Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:54 AM To: ResnickLisa Cc: Neil Dorrill Subject: Pathway Widening Please forward this message to all PBSD Board members as a one way communication. At the 12/7 Board Meeting we will probably be asked to approve a contract for the widening of the pathway on the west side of Pelican Bay Blvd from the Commons to the North Tram station. Before we approve such a contract, I think that it would be prudent for either Mr. Dorrill or Mr. Levy to show us what the current balance is in our Capital Projects fund,what that balance will be after the crosswalks are completed, and what it will be if we proceed with the subject pathway widening. I think we then need to review our list of potential 2012 capital projects and consider the potential of loaning the County $1.5 MM. Pm primarily interested in making sure that widening the pathway in 2012 does not prevent us from resurfacing PBB in 2012. John Chandler December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 1 of 8 ResnickLisa Forwarded message From:John Chandler<iohnchandler219@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Dec 2,2011 at 3:59 PM Subject: Re:FW: RM 2894 Dorrill/Pelican Bay Accelerated Resurfacing Request To:ChesneyBarbara<BarbaraChesneytWcolliergov.net> Cc: Neil Dorrill<Neil @dmgfl.com> The attached draft just arrived from the County. It's a good start toward a final agreement but there are some revisions that Neil and I will want to discuss with the County.Also,there are some questions that need to be addressed.For example,does the$154,608 quote from Road Safe Traffic Systems assume a bike lane? I suggest that this draft and its attachments be included in the 12/7 meeting packet. John Chandler The Executive Summary says"Attached hereto are quotes"but there are no quotes attached. Please email them. John Chandler On Fri, Dec 2,2011 at 3:26 PM,John Chandler<johnchandler219t gmail.com>wrote: The PBSD Board has committed to a couple of"workshops"for Pelican Bay residents to discuss this issue during season. Therefore,our Board will not be voting on this topic until,at least, March.Assuming a positive vote at that time,the PBSD Board will then ask that the issue be put to the BCC for approval. John Chandler PBSD Board Member On Fri, Dec 2,2011 at 2:14 PM,ChesneyBarbara<BarbaraChesney(«colliergov.net>wrote: Mr. Chandler/Mr. Dorrill: John Vliet asked me to forward you the above attached DRAFT ES regarding Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing for your review. Please provide us with your comments or suggested revisions. If you are looking to place on the 12/13/11 agenda,then receipt of your comments would be time sensitive. If looking to be placed on the January BCC agenda,then you of course would have a longer time period to provide. On behalf of John Vliet GMD Road Maintenance Barbara December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 2 of 8 DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to authorize the Pelican Bay Services Division to advance funds to the Growth Management Division to open a Work Order under Contract No. 09-5328 to Better Roads, Inc., for milling and resurfacing and under Contract No. 10-5410 for pavement I markings and restriping to be performed by RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc., for work on Pelican Bay Boulevard, subject to reimbursement of the eligible advanced funds in fiscal years 15/16 and 16/17. OBJECTIVE: To obtain authorization to advance $1,244,638.00 to the Growth Management Division to mill and resurface Pelican Bay Boulevard under Contract No. 09-5328 and for pavement markings and restriping by Road Safe Traffic Systems, Inc., under contract No. 10- 5410, subject to the County reimbursing the advanced funds (less the additional cost of $19,420.00 for brick paver protection (which will not be reimbursed) in the amount of $1,225,218.00, upon the allocation of budgeted funds in fiscal years 15/16 and 16/17 in two equal payments. CONSIDERATIONS: The Community of Pelican Bay is designated as a dependent Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit (MSTBU), whose governing body is the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. The Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) oversees the operation of this Unit. The Community receives County Services directly from Collier County and special, non-County services and benefits from the PBSD. Pelican Bay property owners (both residential and commercial) tax and assess themselves each year to pay for additional PBSD services and amenities. Those PBSD funds are collected by the County but are administered by the PBSD Board. PBSD wants to accelerate the current County programmed h' P grammed resurfacing date for Pelican Bay Boulevard by advancing funds in the amount of$1,244,638.00 to resurface and stripe the road in the current fiscal year, subject to the County's repayment of those advanced funds (less the additional cost for brick paver protection $19,420.00, which will not be reimbursed) without interest upon the allocation of budgeted resurfacing funds in fiscal years 15/16 and 16/17. Attached hereto are quotes from Better Roads, Inc., in the amount of$1,090,030.00 to perform the I road milling and resurfacing, and Road_Safe Traffic Systems, Inc., in the amount of $154,608 (Option #1), to provide pavement markings and striping. If approved, the work would be performed under County Contracts No. 09-5328 and 10-5410 through the issuance of Work Orders. Should any change orders agreed to by the county staff and staff of PBSD increase the cost of the project, funding to cover the increased cost will be advanced by PBSD and eligible expenses likewise reimbursed by the County out of the FY 15/16 and 16/17 resurfacing budget. As part of this arrangement, County staff will manage and supervise the resurfacing construction project. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of$ are budgeted within the MSTD General Fund 111 Road Maintenance budget. December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrators Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 3 of 8 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office, is legally sufficient for Board action and only requires a majority vote for approval—SRT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with this Executive Summary. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize Pelican Bay Services Division to advance $1,244,638.00 to the Growth Management Division to mill and resurface, install new pavement markings and striping of Pelican Bay Boulevard under Contracts No. 09-5328 and 10-5410, subject to the County reimbursing the advanced funds (less the additional cost for brick paver protection$19,420.00,which will not be reimbursed)in the amount of$1,22,5218.00, upon the allocation of budgeted funds in fiscal years 15/16 and 16/17 in two equal payments. Should any change orders agreed to by the county staff and staff of PBSD increase the cost of the project, funding to cover the increased cost will be advanced by PBSD and eligible expenses likewise reimbursed by the County out of the FY 15/16 and 16/17 resurfacing budget. Prepared by: ,Pelican Bay Services Division Attachment: Estimates: Better Roads, Inc.; RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 4 of 8 BETTER JP'S ROADS Air Air IMO Seward Airo Naps,llama!� Imp U..m -.ia us �(DM� ., To: Better Roads Inc Contact: Clay Cross Address: 1910 Seward Avenue Phone: (239)597-2181 Naples,FL USA Fax: (239)597-1597 Project Name: 11333 Pelican Bay Blvd Resurfacing Bid Number: 11333 Project Location: Naples,FL Bid Date: `Line# Item Description Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price' 10 Mobilization 1.00 LS $14,200.00 $14,200.00 20 Maintenance Of Traffic 1.00 LS $23,400.00 $23,400.00 30 1.5"Asphalt Milling 123,250.00 SY $2.00 $246,500.00 40 1.5"Type SP-12.5 T/L-C 9,710.00 TON $81.00 $786,510.00 50 Paver Protection 1.00 LS $19,420.00 $19,420.00 Total Price for above Items: ;1,090,030.00 Total Bid Price: $1,090,030.00 Notes: . PRICE ADJUSTMENT:A primary cost factor of this bid is based on the price of petroleum.Conditions in this market are highly unstable and beyond the control of the proposer.Therefore,the price bid for the asphalt items included in this proposal may be adjusted each month based on the increase or decrease in the statewide average price of liquid asphalt.The statewide average is determined monthly by the Florida Department of Transportation and is posted on the FDOT website.It is called the Monthly Asphalt Price Index and can be found at (http://www.dot.state.fl.us/Construction/fuel&bit/fuel&bit.htm).The amount of the price adjustment for this proposal will be calculated by the following method:For each$0.01 change in the Asphalt Index from the Index on the date of the original proposal and the date the asphalt material is placed the proposed price may be adjusted$0.01/SY INCH or$.20 per ton. • SPECIFIC JOB CONDITIONS: • This is a unit price quote.Billing based on field measurements. • Prices are good through 12/30/2011 only and may be adjusted at any time in accordance with the Price Adjustment criteria stated above. • This proposal must become part of the contract agreement. • No Permits,Fees,Layout,Bond or Testing Included.If Bond is required add 1.5% • Additional phases of projects will not be added at the original contract amount without Better Roads agreement. • Prices based on one mobilization.Additional mobilizations will be charged at$1,800.00 each in addition to the unit prices. • This quote is based solely upon the information provided to Better Roads by which is as follows: • Exclusions:Any item not specifically listed in this proposal. • GENERAL PROPOSAL CONDITIONS: . 1. This Proposal shall become effective upon acceptance by the party or it's representative to whom it is submitted,(the"Owner"). Owner shall be deemed to have accepted this Proposal by allowing Better Roads,Inc. ("Contractor")to commence work or preparation for work. The term"Owner"as used in this Proposal shall include the Owner's architect or engineer. Quotations herein,unless otherwise stated,are for immediate acceptance and subject to change. . 2. This Proposal,in addition to any additional terms expressly incorporated herein by reference,contains the entire agreement between the parties. No modification of this Proposal after acceptance shall be binding upon Contractor unless made in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the Owner and Contractor. Furthermore,no backcharge or claim of the Owner for services shall be valid except by the agreement in writing by Contractor before work is performed. 11/14/2011 10:43:19 AM Page 1 of 2 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 5 of 8 . 3. After acceptance of this Proposal as provided,Contractor shall be given a reasonable time in which to make delivery of materials and/or labor to commence and complete the performance of this Proposal. Contractor shall not be responsible for delays or defaults where occasioned by any causes of any kind and extent beyond it's control,including,but not limited to: delays caused by the owner,architect,or engineers; embargoes,shortages of labor,equipment or materials; vendor priorites and allocations,fires,floods,adverse weather,accidents and acts of God. . 4. Owner shall pay Contractor monthly progress payments on or before the tenth(10th)day of each month in the amount of the total value of work completed plus the amount of materials and equipment stored on the project by the end of the previous month,less the aggregate of previous payments to Contractor. Final payment shall be due when the work described in this Proposal is substantially completed. Sales of materials are payable in cash on delivery of the goods and services. . 5. All sums not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of 1.5%per month from due date until paid,or the maximum legal rate permitted by law,whichever is less. If legal action is required to collect on this Proposal, then Contractor shall recover from Owner all costs of collection,including reasonable attorney's fees. Further, failure by the Owner to make any payment to Contractor as herein provided,shall allow the Contractor to stop work without prejudice to any other remedy it may have. . 6. Owner shall prepare all work areas so they are acceptable for Contractor's work under this Proposal. Contractor will not be called upon to start work until sufficient areas are ready to insure continued work until job completion. The Owner represents and warrants that it shall coordinate the work and performance of it's own forces and any other Contractor on the site or related to Contractor's work so as not to delay,hinder or interfere with Contractor's performance thereof,and so as not to create additional costs to Contractor. If the work of Contractor is delayed,interfered,suspended or otherwise interrupted by Owner,or by any person or act within the power of Owner to control,then Owner shall be liable to Contractor for any increased or extended costs. . 7. Contractor guarantees all workmanship and materials against defects for a period of one year from the date of installation,except those items carrying a manufacturer's warranty which are warranted to the extent of the manufacturer's warranty.THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES,EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES WHICH EXTEND BEYOND THE DESCRIPTION ON PAGE ONE HEREOF. Contractor will not be responsible for special,incidental,or consequential damages. Contractor shall not be responsible for damage to its work by other parties. Any repair work necessitated by Owner-caused damage will be considered as an order for extra work. . 8. Owner shall advise Contractor in writing of any defect or deficiency in the work at the time it is observed. After substantial completion of the work,Owner shall provide a written list of any construction defects or deficiencies to Contractor within fifteen(15)days of receipt of notice of substantial completion from Contractor. Contractor shall remedy those deficiencies within a reasonable time. . 9. Work called for herein is to be performed during Contractor's regular working hours. Overtime rates will be charged for all work performed outside such hours when requested or required by Owner. . 10. All materials shall be furnished in accordance with the respective industry tolerance of color variation, thickness,size,finish,texture and performance standards. . 11. Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Proposal or any of the contract documents for this construction project,Contractor my file a lien or claim on it's behalf in the event that any payment to Contractor is not made as and when provided for by this Proposal. . 12. The Owner shall make no demand for liquidated damages for delays or actual damages for delays in any sum in excess of such amount as may be specifically named in this Proposal,and no liquidated damages may be assessed against Contractor for delays or causes attributed to the Owner,other contractors or arising outside of the scope of this Proposal. ACCEPTED: CONFIRMED: The above prices,specifications and conditions are satisfactory and Better Roads Inc. are hereby accepted. Buyer: Signature: Authorized Signature: Date of Acceptance: Estimator: James S.Maddox (239)597-2181 jamesm @betterroads.net 11/14/2011 10:43:19 AM Page 2 of 2 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status ,. Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 6 of 8 P \ ROadSafe Phone# DATE 11/9/2011 ESTIMATE T5AFIC SY5TFMS 8031 Mainline Parkway `g 239.333 Fort Myers,FL 33912 .4888 ACCT# 25194 " r ;�� Please sign&fax Phone#(239)489-4240 Fax# COL-1 ATTENTION: ALEX if approved with confirmation of Fax#(239)489-0078 * T Contract or P.O.# w Y 1,for billing 239.333.4889 '' Via., f , a� -t41,-C:di2r*Kital purposes. BOARD OF COUNTY ESTIMATOR PELICAN BAY BLVD BICYCLE FACILITY IMP COMMISSIONERS If sending a ATTN:ACCOUNTS PAYABLES D.C. JOB LOCATION Contract/Purchase PO BOX 413016 Order. NAPLES,FL.34101-3016 POC DOUG CROUSE PELICAN BAY BLVD A copy of our Estimate is requested. v s 6/1/2007 ° °' . a t "LETTER OF COMMENCEMENT'WITH"N.T.O."INFORMATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING ANY PROJECT. QTY UNITS ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION UNIT$ TOTAL OPTION#1(EXISTING CONDITIONS) 17,800 NF PW6SK10-30 6"WHITE SKIP(10-30)PAINT 0.35 6,230.00 2,244 SF PPMARROW "ARROW"F.D.O.T./PAINT(66) 2.00 4,488.00 10,000 LF PW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE PAINT(HOLDING LINES) 0.35 3,500.00 69,400 LF PW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE PAINT(NEW EDGE LINES PER STANDARD) 0.35 24,290.00 69,400 LF PY6SL 6"SOLID YELLOW PAINT(NEW EDGE LINES PER STANDARD) 0.35 24,290.00 800 LF PW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE PAINT(STOPBARS) 1.65 1,320.00 2,480 LF PWINTXW... 12"WHITE PAINTED INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALK 0.86 2,132.80 4,080 LF PW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE PAINT(INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALKS) 1.65 6,732.00 8,900 LF TW6SK10-30 6"WHITE SKIP(10-30)THERMOPLASTIC 0.80 7,120.00 1,122 SF TPMAR "ARROW"F.D.O.T/THERMO 3.30 3,702.60 5,000 LF TW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC(HOLDING LINES) 0.80 4,000.00 34,700 LF TW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC 0.80 27,760.00 34,700 LF TY6SL 6"SOLID YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC 0.80 27,760.00 400 LF TW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC/STOPBARS 2.69 1,076.00 1,240 LF TWINTXW... 12"WHITE THERMOPLASTIC INT'L CROSSWALK 1.10 1,364.00 2,040 LF TW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC(INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALKS) 2.69 5,487.60 1,100 EA A/RPM R/W RED/WHITE RPM INSTALLED 3.05 3,355.00 OPTION#1 Subtotal 154,608.00 OPTION#2(4'BIKE LANE) 69,400 LF PW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE PAINT(BIKE LANE) 0.35 24,290.00 17,800 NF PW6SK10-30 6"WHITE SKIP(10-30)PAINT 0.35 6,230.00 2,244 SF PPMARROW "ARROW"F.D.O.T./PAINT 2.00 4,488.00 10,000 LF PW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE PAINT(HOLDING LINES) 0.35 3,500.00 A late payment charge shall be imposed not to exceed the maximum allowed by law or 1 1/2%per month,whichever is less.Purchaser agrees to pay Seller all costs and expenses of collection,suit,or other legal action,including all actual attorney's and paralegal fees,incurred presuit,through trial,on appeal,or in any administrative proceedings brought as a result of the commercial relationship between them.Any cause of action which Seller may have against Purchaser may be assigned by Seller to Road Safe Traffic Systems or any affiliate thereof without the consent of Purchaser. Please sign&fax if approved with confirmation of Contract or P.O.#for billing purposes. BID PRICE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS TOTAL SHEET'S I 4500098994 I SIGNS ARE MOUNTED ON GALV U-CHANNEL POSTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE./PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN TO SCHEDULE WORK. SIGNATURE: Page 1 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 7 of 8 ROadSafei I ESTIMATE T';`sac SYSTEM' Phone# DATE 11/9/2011 8031 Mainline Parkway 239.333.4888 ACCT# 25194 Fort Myers,FL 33912 k` Please sign&fax Phone#(239)489-4240 Fax# COL-1 ATTENTION: ALEX if approved with confirmation of Fax#(239)489-0078 , , Contract Of P.0.# . 239.333.4889 : for billing purposes BOARD OF COUNTY ESTIMATOR PELICAN BAY BLVD BICYCLE FACILITY IMP COMMISSIONERS If sending a ATTN:ACCOUNTS PAYABLES D.C. JOB LOCATION Contract/Purchase PO BOX 413016 Order. NAPLES,FL.34101-3016 POC DOUG CROUSE PELICAN BAY BLVD A copy of our Estimate is requested. ..,. 6/1/2007 "LETTER OF COMMENCEMENT'WITH"N.T.O."INFORMATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING ANY PROJECT. QTY UNITS ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION UNIT$ TOTAL 69,400 LF PW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE PAINT(NEW EDGE LINES PER STANDARD) 0.35 24,290.00 69,400 LF PY6SL 6"SOLID YELLOW PAINT(NEW EDGE LINES PER STANDARDS) 0.35 24,290.00 800 LF PW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE PAINT(STOPBARS) 1.65 1,320.00 2,480 LF PWI2XWA... 12"WHITE PAINTED INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALK 0.86 2,132.80 4,080 LF PW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE PAINT(INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALKS) 1.65 6,732.00 9,720 NF PW6SK6-10 6"WHITE SKIP(6-10)PAINT 0.35 3,402.00 4,986 SF PPMBA "BIKE","LANE","ARROW"/PVMT.MESSAGE/PAINT(2 COATS) 2.00 9,972.00 34,700 LF TW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC(BIKE LANE) 0.80 27,760.00 8,900 NF TW6SK10-30 6"WHITE SKIP(10-30)THERMOPLASTIC 0.80 7,120.00 1,122 SF TPMAR "ARROW"F.D.O.T/THERMO 3.30 3,702.60 5,000 LF TW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC (HOLDING LINES) 0.80 4,000.00 34,700 LF TW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC(NEW EDGE LINES) 0.80 27,760.00 34,700 LF TY6SL 6"SOLID YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC(NEW EDGE LINESO 0.80 27,760.00 400 LF TW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC/STOPBARS 2.69 1,076.00 1,240 LF TWINTXW... 12"WHITE THERMOPLASTIC INT'L CROSSWALK 1.10 1,364.00 2,040 LF TW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC INT'L CROSSWALK 2.69 5,487.60 4,860 NF TW6SK6-I0 6"WHITE SKIP(6-10)THERMOPLASTIC 0.80 3,888.00 1,100 EA A/RPM R/W RED/WHITE RPM INSTALLED 3.05 3,355.00 OPTION#2 Subtotal 223,920.00 OPTION#3 (BIKE LANE W/5'STRIPED BUFFER) 138,800 LF PW8SL 8"SOLID WHITE PAINT 0.49 68,012.00 41,640 LF PW 18SL 18"SOLID WHITE PAINT 1.10 45,804.00 2,244 SF PPMARROW "ARROW"F.D.O.T./PAINT 2.00 4,488.00 10,000 LF PW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE PAINT 0.35 3,500.00 69,400 LF PW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE PAINT(NEW EDGE LINES PER STANDARD) 0.35 24,290.00 A late payment charge shall be imposed not to exceed the maximum allowed by law or 1 1/2%per month,whichever is less.Purchaser agrees to pay Seller all costs and expenses of collection,suit,or other legal action,including all actural attorney's and paralegal fees,incurred presuit,through trial,on appeal,or in any administrative proceedings brought as a result of the commercial relationship between them.Any cause of action which Seller may have against Purchaser may be assigned by Seller to Road Safe Traffic Systems or any affiliate thereof without the consent of Purchaser. Please sign&fax if approved with confirmation of Contract or P.O.#for billing purposes. TOTAL BID PRICE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS SHEET'S 4500098994 SIGNS ARE MOUNTED ON GALV U-CHANNEL POSTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE./PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN TO SCHEDULE WORK. SIGNATURE: Page 2 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status Executive Summary&Estimates from Better Roads,Inc.,&RoadSafe Traffic Systems,Inc. Page 8 of 8 RoadSafe ri ESTIMATE TRAF"rIC SYSTEms Phone# DATE 11/9/2011 8031 Mainline Parkway 239.333.4888 ACCT# 25194 Fort Myers,FL 33912 .E Please sign&fax Phone#(239)489-4240 Fax# COL-1 ATTENTION: ALEX if approved with confirmation of Fax#(239)489-0078 �, Contract or P.O.# a i a for billing 239.333.4889 l ,., ;i � H�,,444 R,A .`. M) purposes. BOARD OF COUNTY ESTIMATOR PELICAN BAY BLVD BICYCLE FACILITY IMP COMMISSIONERS If sending a ATTN:ACCOUNTS PAYABLES D.C. JOB LOCATION Contract/Purchase PO BOX 413016 Order. NAPLES,FL.34101-3016 POC DOUG CROUSE PELICAN BAY BLVD A copy of our Estimate is requested. 6/1/2007 a "LETTER OF COMMENCEMENT"WITH'N.T.O."INFORMATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING ANY PROJECT. QTY UNITS ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION UNIT$ TOTAL 69,400 LF PY6SL 6"SOLID YELLOW PAINT(NEW EDGE LINES PER STANDARD) 0.35 24,290.00 800 LF PW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE PAINT(STOPBARS) 1.65 1,320.00 2,480 LF PW 12XWA... 12"WHITE PAINTED INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALK 0.86 2,132.80 4,080 LF PW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE PAINT INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALK 1.65 6,732.00 9,720 NF PW6SK6-10 6"WHITE SKIP(6-10)PAINT 0.35 3,402.00 4,986 SF PPMBA "BIKE","LANE","ARROW"/PVMT.MESSAGE/PAINT(2 COATS) 2.00 9,972.00 69,400 LF TW8SL 8"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC 0.93 64,542.00 20,820 LF TW 18SL 18"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC 1.65 34,353.00 1,122 SF TPMAR "ARROW"F.D.O.T/THERMO 3.30 3,702.60 5,000 LF TW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC(NEW EDGE LINES) 0.80 4,000.00 34,700 LF TW6SL 6"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC(NEW EDGE LINES) 0.80 27,760.00 34,700 LF TY6SK10-30 6"YELLOW SKIP(10-30)THERMOPLASTIC 0.80 27,760.00 400 LF TW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC/STOPBARS 2.69 1,076.00 1,240 LF TW 12SL 12"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALK 1.10 1,364.00 2,040 LF TW24SL 24"SOLID WHITE THERMOPLASTIC INTERNATIONAL CROSSWALK 2.69 5,487.60 4,860 LF TW6SK6-10 6"WHITE SKIP(6-10)THERMOPLASTIC 0.80 3,888.00 8,070 EA A/RPM R/W RED/WHITE RPM INSTALLED 3.05 24,613.50 OPTION#3 Subtotal 392,489.50 NOTES:THIS ESTIMATE IS A"BEST GUESS"ESTIMATE.FINAL QUANTITIES MAY VERY. A late payment charge shall be imposed not to exceed the maximum allowed by law or 1 1/2%per month,whichever is less.Purchaser agrees to pay Seller all costs and expenses of collection,suit,or other legal action,including all actural attorney's and paralegal fees,incurred presuit,through trial,on appeal,or in any administrative proceedings brought as a result of the commercial relationship between them.Any cause of action which Seller may have against Purchaser may be assigned by Seller to Road Safe Traffic Systems or any affiliate thereof without the consent of Purchaser. Please sign&fax if approved with confirmation of Contract or P.O.#for billing purposes. BID PRICE GOOD FOR 60 DAYS TOTAL SHEETS 4500098994 $771,017.50 SIGNS ARE MOUNTED ON GALV U-CHANNEL POSTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE./PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN TO SCHEDULE WORK. SIGNATURE: Page 3 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status K.Dallas Loan County$1.5 Million for Repaving Pelican Bay Boulevard Fund 322 Non-Ad Valorem Cash Flow Sheet Page 1 of 2 ResnickLisa From: Keith Dallas [keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 4:01 PM To: ResnickLisa Cc: Neil Dorrill; LukaszKyle; McCaughtryMary Subject: Fund 322 Cash Flows Attachments: Fund 322 Cash Flows Loan County$1.5 Lisa, Attached is a sheet for Fund 322 that shows hypothetically the cash flow of the fund, beginning the first of the 2012 fiscal year and going out 10 years, assuming the PBSD does loan the County $1.5 million to resurface Pelican Bay Blvd. It is an update of the one I did earlier this year,taking into account recent activities, known cost changes, and updating for known timing changes. Specifically I have assumed: • The beginning balance comes from page 1 of our 2012 budget, using the "carry forward" and "rolled capital project/program carry forward" lines from the "capital projects" column. It is a reasonable approximation of our starting Fund 322 assets, given what we knew at the point of developing the 2012 Budget. • The assumed Capital Charges assumptions are shown by year below the cash flow projections. • The 2012 Crosswalk figures and Landscaping came from PBSD staff, based on actual costs to date,plus projections for the rest of the project. The crosswalk figures include those financed by the Foundation (the majority of which had been reimbursed to the PBSD by the end of fiscal 2011 and is reflected in our beginning asset balance). It also includes Engineering and moving street lighting cost. • The cost of widening the pathway to 8' on a portion of PBB is based on the first actual proposal we received. Staff is in the process of obtaining hopefully lower quotes. • I moved rebuilding the Myra Daniels pathway to fiscal 2013, since it will probably take that long to renovated St. Williams. • The rest of the items are based on last year's priorities set by the Board, and Wilson Miler's estimates, increased for inflation from 2011. They do not reflect any other projects beyond 2015 that in the future the PBSD may decide are needed. As with any projections,they should be taken with a grain of salt, since they are out of date by the time they are printed. Further the actual timing and scope of future projects may be revised by future PBSD Boards, producing results significantly different than shown.Nonetheless, I think the cash flow projections do indicate that the $1.5 million loan will stress the fund and probably cause the PBSD to alter some of its priorities. This is particularly true if we continue to want to maintain a$500,00 minimum balance in the fund,to protect ourselves from unforeseen emergencies. Keith U)CU 0 ^ C r. o C a) 4) C o o o o o 0 0 0 0 o O L L0 F"1 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 MI a--5 (f) 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G= (0 d' (-' o0000000o0 C w o dS ociOcidOoodoo Icr) U . m LA C-) O O E Ln 0 Li). a c 01 N o a_ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o CO Ns To Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Z10000000000 -A• 4* -o 0. 0000000000 0 ..�C Q C C M M M M M M M M M M O C L o a o '� '_ a Z L L, (0 [O II- CV co O o 0 c O V 0 N a co L •- C7 0� O N > v ci)) c LL p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y-° �i U C L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 L 6 ° " M a) ED t.0 tO tO tO t0 t0 sr) tO t0 + 0 I- (J) m (XO X 0000000000 0 0 � > c° 'C w C o � 0 ,Q- 6- •U m > o _O tp (r1 c al a),t ° m Ln U 0 ,-1 O N Ln to M 01 O O t- 0 + 0 (d 0_ ° m 0 U1- O � 01N1- .--lNEDLn U -oust �' �W CChOOMcoLnto •-( O � 0 -00N 8 go isi co -om CO d CO N ,M-IM 00000001O ,�-I 1) o L o ,--I C m Cl- C y 0 co N Ln Ln r M N .--I Ln O t- a 0 (O ,.= + o 3 >_ r r r I br-Esr .--i ,-I N N 3 N 4... O 0 Om n 0 i�}i�}i�}ifr O j L co ° as •CD {L � N L E U O_) E c°i cc, d t o M CO M Ln 01 0 Tr 01 Co ,-( U (0 a73 0 a=+ ° C1N . N OM1- 03 co O ,--1 Ln ,-1 + L Z U) aw m c C 10 O 13 a-, Ln 01 M CO N to .--( Ln O I- co 0 m a R - D LL L •-i i r r i�} r r ,-1 ,--I m o a c m , Lo C, � aD00 r -EA- mooLn )•corm c LL i M 0 L I-Ci ((U C O m ) 111 0°' w L aa)) c Co FL-) 0 Q- m ° C ce O N N N N N N N N N N 00 O 0 o U Ty >`U .L., Co 00 00 Co 00 00 Co O O CO U La to d Ln c•J m e < 0 0 C M M M M M M M M M M N V O (0 0 r�, °N .2 c > O O N� n n f: n n n r [L (0 3 M ifs c -I w E G t) O U 01 0 001 0 0 001 001 0 CO N -0 Co aEg3 ° f Z 00 - NNNNNNNNNN > O � a �sr a=te-N w 0 D �r �r��••fr4r� co m c aia � - N 11 u1 Q 0 ((00 -JJ 00 Ul a 0 iL " M C7 U a' a ia O N 1_ 0000000000&I 0 - + + + O >• 10 -0 (0 .x, 0000000000 000 .- ce Q co C 0000000000 C + 000 r�o 33 {1_ .1+ 3 U) 00000000000 00000 L ) c a a) 0000000000 — 0000 'C VL E E U r-1 ,-i ,-I r1 rl ,-1 ri rl rl rl 'C In 1_n Lfl N C � = N (NO �-EA--EA--EA--EA--EA-�r-EA-.EA-'Efr 1_n 'Ih -EA--EA-ifr " p U a Q m I M c C C o 'i '-, 000a. J 0O X 00000000 a-' +' - (U w Q N 0 (1)) vi-if *A--b.,-*A-0,- J>- T (0 (0 (0 c � •-■00 N +' 0 M ifrE0Pr 1 0 N C d C C O C O O 7-32 U U Y Ce CC J C 'O C C C 0 U � a C •7Q1•- -T N (ii O •--I 01 N in t0 M 01 0 0 U CO 1- 00 01 n .--1 N to 0 0 o C 0 0 0 O M M t0 t0 N Tr 0 1_n Cr .N� 0 0 0 (0 O N ,--I M 0o O co 01 O t0 O O in 0 N Ln Ln *-i M N ,--I Ln O 0 O O O O M O O * 'fir, -CA-+A- c\r N N N N CO ▪ C= C O 1--1i L N Cr) Tr Ln t0 N CO 01 O ,-I L) J-+ L (0 .--I .--I ,-1 r1 .-1 ,-I rl rl N N a) f04-+ 00000000000 0 C CO N N N N N N N N N N U Q 0 Y December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e.Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status-M.Levy Comments Page 1 of 1 From: Mike Levy To: JtesnickLisa Subject: Spread Sheet for Item 5e-Funding Requirements for Capital Projects(Fund 322) Date: Wednesday,December 07,2011 7:04:24 AM Thanks to Chairman Dallas for modifying the spread sheet developed last April during the PBSD Budget FY 12 Budget preparation. This spread sheet has been modified by Chairman Dallas to show the impact of loaning the County $1.5 million. I believe that it is a minimum projection of capital funds required. For example, with favorable feedback from the community, PBSD may wish to complete the remaining crosswalks in 2012 and to continue with the landscaping renovation. The modified spread sheet does not provide any funds for the remaining cross walks, nor does it provide any additional funds for landscaping until 2015. Also, during the CIP Town Meetings, there was much favorable community reaction to widening the pathways on Pelican Bay Blvd (as well as Gulf Park). Funds are provided for widening the pathways on one side of the road only. Mike Levy mikelevy435 @gmail.com December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status K.Lukasz Comments re:Cash Flow-Lake Bank Restoration Page 1 of 1 From: Keith Dallas [mailto:keithdallas @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:51 AM To: LukaszKyle; ResnickLisa Cc: McCaughtryMary Subject: Re: Cash Flow- Lake Bank Restoration Kyle, Good point. Lisa, make sure rest of Board sees this. Keith On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:47 AM, LukaszKyle wrote: Mr. Dallas, One thing I notice on your Cash Flow sheet is that there is only funding for lake bank restoration for the current FY12.We would need to continue to budget additional funding for this in future years approximately equal to this amount. Otherwise they would deteriorate well beyond what the community would consider acceptable. Kyle December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status-Tentative Timeline Page 1 of 1 Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing (Tentative) Timeline 2011 December 12/2 Receive draft executive summary/recommendation from Nick Casalanguida 12/7 Pelican Bay Services Division Board to review and approve draft executive summary/recommendation 12/13 Board of County Commissioners to approve executive summary/recommendation 2012 January Obtain proposals for bicycle lane survey;J. Chandler recommended online survey company(verify only one vote per resident/household) February Pelican Bay Services Division Board to review survey proposals and make selection February-March Perform survey March-April Pelican Bay Services Division Board to review survey results;approve striping May-June Milling,resurfacing,and striping work could be done as early as May,and as late as June(as long as complete prior to the rainy season) 12/1/2011 1:48:14 PM December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5e. Administrator's Report-Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status-PBPOA Proposal Page 1 of 1 , , ''I'r ' %.,S7'411iivT,„ ‘ PELICAN BAY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, 01/4_ , INC. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 600, •Naples, FL 34108 /// t 4 (239) 566-9707 • FAX (239) 598-9485 • E-Mail PBPOA@,pbpropertyowners.org November 16, 2011 Keith Dallas, Chair Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive Naples FL 34108 Subject: Inter-fund transfer from PBSD to Collier County The PBPOA is not in favor of the current status of the preliminary proposal of processing an inter-fund transfer of 1.1 (or 1.5) million dollars to resurface the Pelican Bay Boulevard in 2012. However, we do support providing a secured loan which would be payable in full in 2015. To secure this loan, collateral would be the twelve acres of land presently owned by the County within Pelican Bay. A default (2015) would result in the transfer of the twelve acre property to the Foundation. We do not support any delayed repayments, interest free or unsecured loan to the County. Sincerely, Swan, 11147. Moran& Susan Boland, President Cc: J.Hoppensteadt, W. Carpenter, Chair December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 1 of 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign a Department of Environmental Protection, Coastal Partnership Initiative (CPI) Grant Agreement and authorize all necessary budget amendments to recognize grant revenue in the amount of $53,000 for a Dune Restoration Project in the Clam Bay Park area. OBJECTIVE: To approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Coastal Partnership Initiative Grant Agreement with the Department of Environmental Protection for a Dune Restoration Project in the Clam Bay Park area. CONSIDERATIONS: Collier County applied for a CPI Grant which was approved by the Board on November 9, 2010. The County was awarded grant funds in the amount of$53,000. This Grant will allow Coastal Zone Management staff and its contracted vendor to remove exotic plants from the dune line landward 150 feet throughout the Clam Pass Park area. The proposed Dune Restoration Project is a twofold project. This project will enhance and restore the beach dune system by first removing all non-native invasive plant species and, secondly, by planting native species after the invasive plant species have been removed. Non- native plant species such as Scaevola (Scaevola taccada), Australian Pine (Casuarina equisetifolia) and Brazilian Pepper (Schinus terebinthifoliusa) are encroaching upon and smothering the native plant species within the Clam Pass Park area. Shallow roots from non- native plants do not allow for dunes to become stable and cause sand loss, habitat loss and beach erosion. Once the existing invasive plant species have been removed, native plants such as Sea Oats, Beach Elder and Beach Morning Glory will be planted along the beach front landward 15 feet. Areas behind the 15 foot planted zone will allow for natural recruitment of native plant species. FISCAL IMPACT: Total project cost is $106,000. Grant revenue represents $53,000 and requires a 50% match with cash, in-kind or a combination of both. A budget amendment is required to recognize grant proceeds in the amount of $53,000 to Public Services Grant Fund (709) Project 33183. Collier County will provide $53,000 in cash match including staff time and operating supplies for a total project cost of$106,000. A budget amendment is required in the amount of$53,000 to Public Services Grant Match Fund (710) Project 33183. Cash match is available within TDC Beach Renourishment Fund(195)Project 90044. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Dune Restoration Project will support the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the County Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County's Attorney's Office, requires majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action.—CMG RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Department of Environmental Protection, Coastal Partnership Initiative (CPI) Grant Agreement / December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrators Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 2 of 10 and authorize all necessary budget amendments to accept grant revenue in the amount of$53,000 for a Dune Restoration Project in the Clam Bay Park area. PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management Department Director December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 3 of 10 RECAP COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners AGENDA November 08, 2011 9:00 AM 16 D. PUBLIC SERVICES DIVISION 14) Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign a Department of Environmental Protection, Coastal Partnership Initiative (CPI) Grant Agreement and authorize all necessary budget amendments to recognize grant revenue in the amount of$53,000 for a Dune Restoration Project in the Clam Bay Park area. For the removal of non-native plant species while replacing and replanting native plant species �y[ gi December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 4 of 10 ATTACHMENT A PROJECT WORK PLAN DEP Agreement#CM210 Proiect Title: Collier County Dune Restoration Proiect Grantee Organization Name: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Chief Elected Official or Agency Head: Fred Coyle Title: Chairman Address:3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 303 City:Naples Zip Code: 34112-5746 Area Code and Telephone Number: (239)252-8097 Area Code and Facsimile Machine Telephone Number:(239)252-3602 E-Mail Address: Fredcoyle(acolliergov.net Proiect Manager Organization Name: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Name: Pamela Keyes Address:3301 East Tamiami Trail,Suite 103 City:Naples Zip Code: 34112 Area Code and Telephone Number: (239)252-2980 Area Code and Facsimile Machine Telephone Number:(239)353-2950 E-Mail Address: pamelakeyesna,colliergov.net Fiscal Agent Organization Name: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Name: Pamela Keyes Address:3299 East Tamiami Trail City:Naples Zip Code: 34112 Area Code and Telephone Number: (239)252-2980 Area Code and Facsimile Machine Telephone Number: (239)353-2950 • E-Mail Address: Pamelakeyes@a,colliergov.net DEP Agreement No.CM210,Attachment A,Page 1 of 7 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 5 of 10 Mailing Address for Warrant(if other than the Grantee address): FEID No.: 59-6000558 DUNS No.: 076997790 Project Location: Identify the location of the project and include the county/counties involved in the project area. If this project affects water,include the watershed and hydrologic unit code. The Dune Restoration Project is located in Collier County within Clam Pass Park. County in which project is located: Collier DEP Agreement No.CM210,Attachment A,Page 2 of 7 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 6 of 10 • Abstract Description:Briefly but completely describe the problem to be addressed and the project solution to the problem. Please limit to one page. Collier County,located on Florida's southwest coast,has over 40 miles of beach and dune habitats that are threatened by encroachment of non-native invasive plants such as Scaevola,Australian pine and Brazilian pepper. The county's coastal dune habitats are vital not only for keystone species such as the gopher tortoise,but also for loggerhead sea turtles and shore birds,such as the piping plover and least tern. Native plants(railroad vine,sea oats and beach elder)are critical for stabilizing and building the dune system;however,these native species are being crowded-out and overrun by exotic invasive species. Collier County requests FCMP funds to implement a dune restoration project to restore the beach dune system within the Clam Pass Park,one of Collier County's most heavily visited parks with over 115,000 visitors a year. The proposed dune restoration is twofold: it will enhance and restore the beach dune system by removing all non- native invasive plant species,then native species will be planted along the beach front. County staff will monitor the beaches and dunes for any exotic plant re-growth and immediately remove any invasives found to be reseeding,and will monitor new plantings to ensure their healthy growth. Once the native species are planted,the root systems will immediately begin to help stabilize and build the dune system. The treatment and removal of invasive plants will begin on the westernmost dune vegetation and continue landward 150 feet. Native plants will be planted on 1-foot centers using a hydro gel to ensure survival throughout the winter. Collier County will plant 69,000 plants in the Clam Pass Park area,and will supply the ropes,posts and educational signs to keep visitors off the newly-planted vegetation. A volunteer day will also conducted to assist the contractor, Earth Balance,in planting native vegetation. Information on beaches,dunes,erosion,and invasive species will be provided to all volunteers. FCMP funds will be used for contractual services. Non-federal matching funds will be derived from salaries (county staff supervising plant removal and native plantings);use of county equipment(trucks,gas);supplies(ropes, posts and educational signage);a portion of contractual services;and costs for any permits needed for vehicle beach access($250 per vehicle). • DEP Agreement No.CM210,Attachment A,Page 3 of 7 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 7of10 Proiect Description,Related Tasks and Deliverables: Provide a detailed description of the work to be performed for the project. Project descriptions must include specific tasks for the completion of the project, deliverables specific to the tasks(required reports such as progress reports and final reports are not deliverables as they are required by all agreements and are not project specific),estimated timeline for the completion of the tasks and submittal of the deliverables and the criteria that will be used to evaluate the successful completion of the task. PAYMENT WILL BE BASED ON COMPLETION OF DELIVERABLES: Deliverables must be submitted and approved prior to payment.Deliverables must be quantifiable,measurable and verifiable.Each deliverable must be directly related to a task specified in the scope of work and must identify the minimum level of service to be performed. Task 1($57,604.16): Treatment and removal of invasive plant species will begin on the westernmost dune vegetation and will go landward 150 feet.All woody species and shrubs within the 50 to 75 feet of the beach will be cut into 4-foot to 6-foot pieces and scattered or piled inside the thicker vegetation out of sight of the beach.All remaining targeted invasive species landward and not visible from the beach will be killed-in-place with an approved herbicide. Deliverable 1.1($57,604.16): Project oversight and photos of the treatment and removal of invasive plant species. Completion Date: January 31,2012 Budget Information:$53,000-FCMP&$4,604.14-Match Salaries: $2,961.92-Staff time is estimated to be 128 hours of oversight. The Environmental Specialist will oversee this project and the hourly rate is$23.14. Fringe Benefits:$1,642.24 will be used as match in Fringe Benefits for the Environmental Specialist oversight. These benefits will be reported as actual cost paid. This number was derived from actual hourly cost of fringe benefits being$12.83. Contractual Services: $53,000 will be contracted to,Earth Balance for the removal of exotics. Task 2($43,104.16):Replant native plants such as Sea Oats,Railroad vine,and Beach Elder along the front of the beach dune and back 15 feet. Deliverable 2.1($43,104.16): Project photos of the replanting of native plants such as Sea Oats,Railroad vine,and Beach Elder along the front of the beach dune and back 15 feet. Completion Date: January 31,2012 Budget Information:$43,104.16-Match Salaries: $2,961.92-Staff time is estimated to be 128 hours of oversight. The Environmental Specialist will oversee this project and the hourly rate is$23.14. Fringe Benefits:$1,642.24 will be used as match in Fringe Benefits for the Environmental Specialist oversight. These benefits will be reported as actual cost paid. This number was derived from actual hourly cost of fringe benefits being$12.83. Other Expenses: The Environmental Specialist will use the County truck as match. All gas usage and a percentage of truck usage will be documented. Staff estimates this usage at$500 Contractual Services: $38,000 of cash match will be contracted to Earth Balance for the planting of native plants. Task 3($3,379.10):Protect Dunes and educate citizens.Collier County will Install ropes and post educational signs to keep people off the newly planted plants. Deliverable 3.1 ($3,379.10): Photos of rope and signage installed. Completion Date: January 31,2012 Budget Information:$3,379.10-Match Salaries: $694.20-Staff will be onsite to oversee the contractor,answer any questions and educate the public and document the progress. Staff time is estimated to be 30 hours of project coordination,education and project oversight. Also,the Environmental Specialist will be responsible for ordering supplies,tracking Purchase Orders and maintaining all associated paperwork. The Environmental Specialist will oversee this project and the hourly rate is$23.14. DEP Agreement No.CM210,Attachment A,Page 4 of 7 _ r December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 8 of 10 Fringe Benefits: $384.90 will be used as match in Fringe Benefits for the Environmental Specialist position. These benefits will be reports as actual cost paid. This number was derived from actual hourly cost of fringe benefits being $12.83. Supplies:$1,200-Collier County staff will order and purchase ropes,posts and educational signs for the contractor to install. Contractual Services: $1,100 will be contracted to Earth Balance to install ropes and post and educational signs. Task 4($1,193.18):Volunteer Planting Day.Education about beaches,dunes,erosion,exotic plants and invasive species will also be provided to all volunteers. Deliverable 4.1 ($1,193.18): Sign in Sheets and copies of materials(hand-outs,PowerPoint presentations. Completion Date: February 29,2012 Budget Information:$1,193.18-Match Salaries: $436.58-Environmental Specialist—20 hours,$23.14,=$462.80. University of Florida Sea Grant Agent- 12 hours,$22.00=$264.00. Senior Equipment Operator—12 hours,$15.30=$183.60.The County is only claiming $436.58 as match. Supplies:$500 will be used towards the purchase of sea oats,hydrating gel,shovels,gloves,water for the volunteers. Fringe Benefits: Fringe Benefits for the Environmental Specialist will be$256.60.This number was derived from actual hourly cost of fringe benefits being$12.83. Task 5($719.40):Exotic Monitoring. Deliverable 5.1($719.40):Exotic Monitoring Report. Completion Date: April 30,2012 Budget Information:$719.40-Match Salaries: $462.80-Staff time is estimated to be 20 hours to monitor the project area,document any exotic recruitment and contact the contractor if needed. Once completed the Environmental Specialist will write a final report to submit to the Granting Agency on the projects progress. The Environmental Specialist will oversee this project and the hourly rate is$23.14. Fringe Benefits:$256.60 will be will be used as match in Fringe Benefits for the Environmental Specialist oversight. These benefits will be reported as actual cost paid. This number was derived from actual hourly cost of fringe benefits being$12.83. DEP Agreement No.CM210,Attachment A,Page 5 of 7 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 9 of 10 Total Project Budget Schedule: Please type the total dollar amounts in all applicable categories and leave other categories blank. If your grant Agreement requires match,it must equal the FCMP funds requested,or one hundred percent(100%). Budizet CateMory FCMP Funds MATCH Funds 1. Salaries 7.517.42 2. Fringe Benefits 4,182.58 3. Travel 4. Equipment Purchases 5. Supplies 1.700 6. Contractual Services 53.000 39,100 7. Other Expenses 500 8. Indirect Charges FCMP Total $53,000 Match Total $53,000 NOAA Project Total $106,000 Total Project Cost: $106,000 (The total cost of the project includes all costs for the project provided by all funding sources.) DEP Agreement No.CM210,Attachment A,Page 6 of 7 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park&Along Beach Page 10 of 10 Project Budget Narrative: Describe line items for each applicable budget category shown on the budget schedule. Provide sufficient detail to show cost relationship to project activities. Complete for both FCMP and match items,if applicable. If in-kind match is being provided by a third party,a letter from that party confirming the amount and type of that match must be included with this project work plan. Note: Indirect costs are not allowed as match. FCMP Funds: Contractual Services$53,000: $53,000 will be contracted out to Earth Balance for the removal of exotic vegetation. Match Funds: Salaries$7,991.24: The Environmental Specialist will be supervising and managing all grant related activities. The Environmental Specialist position is compensated at$23.14 hourly. This rate does not include Fringe Benefits(please see below). It is estimated that all deliverable will take 338 hours to complete. 24 of these hours will be completed by the University of Florida Sea Grant Agent- 12 hours,$22.00=$264.00. Senior Equipment Operator—12 hours, $15.30=$183.60 Fringe Benefits$4,182.58: Fringe Benefits for the Environmental Specialist oversight for all deliverables. These benefits will be reported as actual cost paid. This number was derived from actual hourly cost of fringe benefits being$12.83. Supplies$1,700: $500 will be used towards the purchase of sea oats,hydrating gel,shovels,gloves,water for the volunteers.$1,200- Collier County staff will order and purchase ropes,posts and educational signs for the contractor to install. Contractual Services$39,100: $39,100 will be contracted out to Earth Balance for exotic plant removal and the planting of native plants. Other Expenses$500: The Environmental Specialist will use the County truck as match. All gas usage and a percentage of truck usage will be documented. DEP Agreement No.CM210,Attachment A,Page 7 of 7 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park Pelican Bay Foundation Authorization to Collier County/Coastal Zone Management to Remove Invasive Vegetation at"Park Site&Conservation Area Page 1 of 2 PHICAN MA f BAY Pelican Bay Foundation,Inc. Via Mail and Email December 1,2011 J. Gary McAlpin, Director Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department 3301 E.Tamiami Trail,Suite 103 Naples, FL 34112 Pamela Keyes, Environmental Specialist Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department 3301 E.Tamiami Trail,Suite 103 Naples,FL 34112 Dear Gary and Pam: You have requested the prior written approval of the Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. (the "Foundation" for the removal of certain invasive plants species in the areas defined as the Park Site and Conservation Area in that certain Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions(the"Declaration")dated April 13, 1982, filed in OR Book 000966, Pages 001844-53. Section 2(a)of the Declaration provides that"All vegetation in PARK SITE and CONSERVATION AREA shall be left in its native state. However,when removal of any vegetation in PARK SITE or CONSERVATION AREA is necessary,a plan for such removal by OWNER shall be submitted to DECLARANT for its prior written approval." You have advised us that the County has received a DEP Grant Agreement No. CM210(the"Grant Agreement")for treatment and removal of invasive plant species that will begin on the westernmost dune vegetation and will go landward 150 feet. The Grant Agreement provides that all woody species and shrubs within the 50 to 75 feet of the beach will be cut into 4-foot to 6-foot pieces and scattered or piled inside the thicker upland vegetation(not in any areas populated by mangroves),out of sight of the beach,and that all remaining targeted invasive species landward and not visible from the beach will be killed-in-place with an approved herbicide. You have further described in greater detail the specifics of your plan for removal of the invasive species in a meeting with the Foundation's President and Secretary on November 15,2011 in the County offices of the Coastal Zone Management Department,indicating that such removal will primarily be conducted along the length of beach between markers 36A and 39A. 1 Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc.•6251 Pelican Bay Boulevard•Naples, Florida 34108 (239) 597-8081 • (239) 597-6802 FAX•E-Mail:memberservices@pelicanbay.org December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5g. Administrator's Report-Update on Removing Exotics from Clam Pass Park Pelican Bay Foundation Authorization to Collier County/Coastal Zone Management to Remove Invasive Vegetation at"Park Site&Conservation Area" Page 2 of 2 Please be advised that the Foundation grants its approval for the removal of invasive plant species in the Park Site and Conservation Area as per the Grant Agreement and the specifics of your removal plan as relayed on November 15,2011. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, PELIC fr OUNDATION, INC. James Hop steadt President Cc: Pelican Bay Foundation Board of Directors Steve Feldhaus,Secretary—Pelican Bay Foundation Keith Dallas,Chairman, Pelican Bay Services Division Neil Dorrill,Administrator, Pelican Bay Services Division Kyle Lukasz, Pelican Bay Services Division 2 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) Page 1 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 1,2011 Operating Fund 109 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments 2,117,648.67 Interest Receivable 1,755.71 Due from Property Appraiser 343.85 Due from Tax Collector 19,033.41 Total Current Assets $ 2,138,781.64 Total Assets $ 2,138,781.64 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 6,726.47 Accrued Wages Payable - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 60,342.91 Total Liabilities $ 67,069.38 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 1,292,615.54 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 779,096.72 Total Fund Balance 2,071,712.26 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 2,138,781.64 0 0 iO ti r4 O N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) Page 2 of 11 • Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 1,2011 Operating Fund 109-FY 2011 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ 1,122,300.00 $ - Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 666,300.00 319,824.00 321,791.73 1,967.73 Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 1,907,800.00 915,744.00 928,741.05 12,997.05 Special Assessment Past Due 2,603.19 2,603.19 Charges for Services 1,500.00 - - - Surplus Property Sales - - - Insurance Payment for Damages - - Interest 15,300.00 841.50 858.11 16.61 Total Operating Revenues $ 3,713,200.00 $ 2,358,709.50 $ 2,376,294.08 $ 17,584.58 Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense $ 41,400.00 $ 6,900.00 $ 4,233.91 $ 2,666.09 Emergency Maintenace and Repairs 8,800.00 - - - IT Direct Capital 400.00 - - - IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 4,800.00 - - - Indirect Cost Reimbursement 84,500.00 42,300.00 42,250.00 50.00 Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 13,400.00 100.00 - 100.00 Other Contractural Services 26,900.00 4,500.00 4,144.00 356.00 Telephone 3,900.00 700.00 476.50 223.50 Postage and Freight 3,000.00 100.00 2.64 97.36 Rent Buildings and Equipment 11,300.00 2,800.00 2,532.00 268.00 Insurance-General 1,200.00 200.00 - 200.00 Printing,Binding and Copying 2,300.00 200.00 - 200.00 Clerk's Recording Fees 2,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 Advertising 2,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 Other Office and Operating Supplies 2,000.00 300.00 143.49 156.51 Training and Education 1,100.00 200.00 25.00 175.00 Total Water Management Admin Operating $ 209,000.00 $ 58,700.00 $ 53,807.54 $ 4,892.46 Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 132,800.00 $ 22,100.00 $ 14,519.32 $ 7,580.68 Engineering Fees 12,000.00 2,000.00 236.25 1,763.75 Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 14,000.00 1,164.67 - 1,164.67 Landscape Materials/Replanting Program 8,500.00 1,414.67 - 1,414.67 Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 22,600.00 3,800.00 - 3,800.00 Plan Review Fees 1,500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 1,000.00 200.00 286.42 (86.42) Temporary Labor 42,400.00 9,100.00 9,284.00 (184.00) Telephone 500.00 100.00 72.08 27.92 Trash and Garbage 5,700.00 3,100.00 1,322.87 1,777.13 Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 - - - Insurance-General 2,300.00 23.00 - 23.00 Insurance-Auto 900.00 90.00 - 90.00 Building Repairs&Mntc. 1,700.00 - - - Fleet Maintenance and Parts 5,400.00 900.00 - 900.00 Fuel and Lubricants 8,900.00 1,500.00 - 1,500.00 Tree Triming 30,000.00 5,000.00 2,496.00 2,504.00 o Clothing and Uniforms 1,100.00 300.00 447.31 (147.31) io m N ti Page 1of3 N O N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) - Page 3of11 Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 100.00 - 100.00 Fertilizer and Herbicides 98,400.00 16,900.00 16,488.91 411.09 Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 300.00 151.75 148.25 Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 1,900.00 1,949.06 ' (49.06) Total Water Management Field Operating $ 394,300.00 $ 69,992.33 $ 47,253.97 $ 22,738.36 Right of Way Beautification-Operating Payroll Expense $ 42,600.00 $ 7,100.00 $ 4,362.01 $ 2,737.99 Emergency Repairs and Maintenance 7,400.00 - - - IT Direct Capital 400.00 - - - Office Automation 14,100.00 5,700.00 - 5,700.00 Other Contractural Services 34,300.00 5,700.00 4,867.00 833.00 Telephone 3,900.00 700.00 480.50 219.50 Postage 3,000.00 200.00 2.66 197.34 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 12,500.00 3,100.00 2,715.61 384.39 Insurance-General 500.00 - - - Printing,Binding and Copying 2,600.00 200.00 - 200.00 Clerk's Recording 2,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 Legal Advertising 2,000.00 200.00 200.00 Office Supplies General 2,500.00 400.00 214.97 185.03 Training and Education 1,500.00 300.00 25.00 275.00 Total Right of Way Beautification Operating $ 129,300.00 $ 23,800.00 $ 12,667.75 $ 11,132.25 Right of Way Beautification-Field Payroll Expense $ 807,300.00 $ 134,600.00 $ 78,160.23 $ 56,439.77 Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 - - - Flood Control(Water Use&Swale/Berm Mntc.) 89,900.00 16,600.00 16,320.44 279.56 Pest Control 5,000.00 800.00 - 800.00 Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 400.00 865.76 (465.76) Other Contractural Services 29,500.00 4,900.00 3,070.00 1,830.00 Temporary Labor 190,100.00 39,900.00 39,721.12 178.88 Telephone 3,200.00 500.00 430.38 69.62 Electricity 3,400.00 600.00 271.20 328.80 Trash and Garbage 17,000.00 2,800.00 2,793.54 6.46 Rent Equipment 2,500.00 400.00 (32.86) 432.86 Motor Pool Rental Charge 300.00 - - - Insurance-General 8,800.00 1,500.00 - 1,500.00 Insurance-Auto 10,000.00 1,700.00 - 1,700.00 Building Repairs and Maintenance 1,700.00 300.00 - 300.00 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 25,100.00 4,200.00 1,257.25 2,942.75 Fuel and Lubricants 67,300.00 11,200.00 - 11,200.00 Licenses,Permits,Training 800.00 100.00 - 100.00 Tree Triming 63,600.00 11,600.00 11,200.00 400.00 Clothing and Uniforms 9,400.00 1,500.00 1,463.02 36.98 Personal Safety Equipment 3,000.00 500.00 153.00 347.00 Fertilizer and Herbicides 62,000.00 17,100.00 22,211.47 (5,111.47) Landscape Maintenance 46,000.00 17,700.00 17,832.15 (132.15) Mulch/Landscape Materials 53,100.00 8,000.00 5,979.00 2,021.00 Pathway Repairs 6,000.00 1,000.00 - 1,000.00 Sprinkler Maintenance 30,000.00 5,000.00 1,722.58 3,277.42 Painting Supplies 800.00 100.00 - 100.00 Traffic Signs 3,000.00 500.00 - 500.00 Minor Operating Equipment 3,000.00 500.00 638.80 (138.80) Other Operating Supplies 9,000.00 1,500.00 1,396.02 103.98 Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 1,556,600.00 $ 285,500.00 $ 205,453.10 $ 80,046.90 m Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,289,200.00 $ 437,992.33 $ 319,182.36 $ 118,809.97 0 0 ti M ,-I '-I o Page 2 of 3 N O N N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) Page 4 of 11 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Field Operations Other Machinery and Equipment $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ - General improvements - - - - Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Right of Way Beautification-Field Autos and Trucks $ 102,000.00 $ - $ - Other Machinery and Equipmeny 1,000.00 - - Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 103,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Capital Expenditures $ 104,000.00 $ - $ - $ Total Operating Expenditures $ 2,393,200.00 $ 437,992.33 $ 319,182.36 $ 118,809.97 Non-Operating Expenditures: - Transfer to Fund 322 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ 436,500.00 $ Tax Collector Fees 79,600.00 19,900.00 6,029.31 13,870.69 Property Appraiser Fees 73,300.00 37,383.00 37,210.69 172.31 Reserves(2 1/2 months for Operations) 538,000.00 540,300.00 540,300.00 Reserves for Equipment 94,800.00 94,800.00 94,800.00 - Reserved for Attrition (31,700.00) (31,700.00) (31,700.00) - Revenue Reserve 129,500.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 1,320,000.00 $ 1,097,183.00 $ 1,083,140.00 $ 14,043.00 Total Expenditures $ 3,713,200.00 $ 1,535,175.33 $ 1,402,322.36 $ 132,852.97 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 823,534.17 $ 973,971.72 $ 150,437.55 T3- 0 0 ti io ti N a ° Page 3 of 3 O December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) Page 5 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 1,2011 Street Lighting Fund 778 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 377,559.06 Interest Receivable 224.16 Due from Tax Collector 2,178.50 Total Current Assets $ 379,961.72 Total Assets $ 379,961.72 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 64.40 Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 2,806.64 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 2,871.04 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 194,157.20 Excess Revenue(Expenditures) 182,933.48 Total Fund Balance 377,090.68 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 379,961.72 0 0 en m cp en 0 0 N N 0 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) • Page 6 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 1,2011 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2011 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ 157,600.00 $ - Curent Ad Valorem Tax 436,800.00 209,664.00 215,594.21 $ 5,930.21 Delinquent Ad Valorem Tax 15.36 $ 15.36 Insurance Claim 10,366.50 $ 10,366.50 Interest 4,500.00 225.00 108.79 $ (116.21) Total Operating Revenues 598,900.00 367,489.00 383,684.86 16,195.86 Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense $ 41,400.00 $ 6,900.00 $ 4,233.82 $ 2,666.18 Indirect Cost Reimbursement 5,300.00 $ 2,650.00 2,650.00 $ - Other Contractural Services 26,900.00 $ 4,483.33 4,144.00 $ 339.33 Telephone 3,900.00 $ 700.00 363.04 $ 336.96 Postage and Freight 2,000.00 $ 100.00 2.64 $ 97.36 Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 12,100.00 $ 2,000.00 2,636.50 $ (636.50) Insurance-General 300.00 $ - - $ - Office Supplies General 800.00 $ 100.00 - $ 100.00 Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,000.00 $ 200.00 - $ 200.00 Total Street Lighting Admin Operating 93,700.00 17,133.33 14,030.00 3,103.33 Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense 62,500.00 10,400.00 6,671.22 3,728.78 Emergency Maintenance&Repairs 9,600.00 - - - Other Contractual Services 800.00 100.00 - 100.00 Telephone 400.00 100.00 72.08 27.92 Electricity 44,200.00 7,400.00 5,844.70 1,555.30 Insurance-General 800.00 - - Insurance-Auto 900.00 - - Building Maintenace&Repairs 1,700.00 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 4,300.00 4,300.00 - 4,300.00 Fuel and Lubricants 1,200.00 1,200.00 - 1,200.00 Other Equipment Repairs 200.00 200.00 - 200.00 Personal Safety Equipment 500.00 500.00 - 500.00 Other Operating Supplies 64.40 (64.40) Electrical Contractors 7,300.00 3,700.00 3,899.00 (199.00) 0 0 ti Page 1 of 2 O N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) Page 7 of 11 Light Bulb Ballast 12,400.00 1,700.00 - 1,700.00 Total Street Lighting Field Operating 146,800.00 29,600.00 16,551.40 13,048.60 Total Field Expenditures 240,500.00 46,733.33 30,581.40 16,151.93 Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Field Operations Other Machinery/Equipment 1,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 General Improvements - - - - Total Capital Expenditures 1,000.00 200.00 - 200.00 Total Operating Expenditures 241,500.00 46,933.33 30,581.40 16,351.93 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees 13,500.00 3,375.00 2,172.76 1,202.24 Property Appraiser Fees 8,900.00 2,225.00 - 2,225.00 Reserve for Future Construction 228,100.00 228,100.00 228,100.00 Reserves(2 1/2 mos.for Operations) 54,900.00 54,900.00 54,900.00 - Reserves for Equipment 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 - Revenue Reserve 22,000.00 - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures 357,400.00 318,600.00 315,172.76 3,427.24 Total Expenditures 598,900.00 365,533.33 345,754.16 19,779.17 Net Profit/(Loss) - 1,955.67 37,930.70 35,975.03 n 0 0 M Page 2 of 2 0 N N O N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) • Page 8 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 1,2011 Clam Bay Fund 320 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 358,446.92 Interest Receivable 408.92 Due from Tax Collector 939.67 Total Current Assets 359,795.51 Total Assets $ 359,795.51 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 522.50 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities 522.50 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 303,213.58 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 56,059.43 Total Fund Balance 359,273.01 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 359,795.51 W O 0 M N '4 O N N O ry N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) • Page 9 of 11 • Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 1,2011 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2011 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ 289,511.88 $ - Special Assessment 127,100.00 61,008.00 61,370.38 362.38 Special Assessment Past Due 496.47 496.47 Fund 111 34,000.00 - - - Transfer from Tax Collector 939.67 939.67 Interest 700.00 100.00 192.62 92.62 Total Operating Revenues $ 451,311.88 $ 350,619.88 $ 352,511.02 $ 1,891.14 Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees $ 163,368.75 $ 27,200.00 $ 1,724.00 $ 25,476.00 Other Contractural Services 70,151.60 11,700.00 2,496.00 9,204.00 Tree Trimming 29,000.00 4,800.00 - 4,800.00 Other Equipment Repairs 349.77 - - - Aerial Photography 7,500.00 - - Minor Operating 588.01 - - - Other Operating Supplies 1,000.00 - - - Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 271,958.13 $ 43,700.00 $ 4,220.00 $ 39,480.00 Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees $ 7,253.75 $ 100.00 $ - $ 100.00 Other Contractual Services 143,000.00 1,200.00 - 1,200.00 Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ 150,253.75 $ 1,300.00 $ - $ 1,300.00 Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 422,211.88 $ 45,000.00 $ 4,220.00 $ 40,780.00 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 3,900.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 297.64 $ 1,652.36 Property Appraiser Fees 2,600.00 1,558.00 1,482.37 75.63 Revenue Reserve 6,700.00 - - Reserves(2 1/2 month for Operations) 15,900.00 15,900.00 15,900.00 Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 29,100.00 $ 19,408.00 $ 17,680.01 $ 1,727.99 Total Expenditures $ 451,311.88 $ 64,408.00 $ 21,900.01 $ 42,507.99 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 286,211.88 $ 330,611.01 $ 44,399.13 0 CO Page 1 of 1 i December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) Page 10 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 1,2011 Capital Projects Fund 322 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 2,674,900.44 Interest Receivable 2,699.73 Due from Tax Collector 2,453.47 Total Current Assets 2,680,053.64 Total Assets $ 2,680,053.64 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 31,289.78 Goods Received Inv. Received 26,373.96 Total Liabilities 57,663.74 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved 2,582,848.52 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 39,541.38 Total Fund Balance 2,622,389.90 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 2,680,053.64 O 0 0 N m vi N N N 9 N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 5h. Administrator's Report I Monthly Financial Report(Revised) Page 11 of 11 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 1,2011 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2011 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ 2,553,384.04 $ - Transfer from Fund 109 General 436,500.00 436,500.00 436,500.00 - Foundation Payment for Crosswalks - - 53,487.00 53,487.00 Special Assessment 331,900.00 159,312.00 161,533.04 2,221.04 Interest 19,500.00 1,950.00 1,262.16 (687.84) Total Operating Revenues $ 3,341,284.04 $ 3,151,146.04 $3,206,166.24 $ 55,020.20 Operating Expenditures: Irrigation&Landscaping Engineering Fees $ 132,154.37 $ 11,012.86 $ 8,844.65 $ 2,168.21 Lake Bank Restoration 85,000.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 2,978,637.97 173,753.88 156,161.17 17,592.71 Sprinkler System - Landscape Materials 16,369.00 (16,369.00) Licenses and Permits 1,000.00 (1,000.00) Traffic Signs 50,000.00 - - - Electrical Contractors 7,004.18 (7,004.18) Other Operating Supplies(Pavers) 39,568.70 39,568.70 38,326.10 1,242.60 Other Road Materials 21,323.00 - - - Total Irrigation&Landscaping Expenditures $ 3,306,684.04 $ 224,335.45 $ 227,705.10 $ (3,369.65) Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 10,300.00 $ 2,575.00 $ 777.21 $ 1,797.79 Property Appraiser Fees 6,800.00 4,080.00 3,896.51 183.49 Reserve for Contingencies - - - - Revenue Reserve 17,500.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 34,600.00 $ 6,655.00 $ 4,673.72 $ 1,981.28 Total Expenditures $ 3,341,284.04 $ 230,990.45 $ 232,378.82 $ (1,388.37) Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 2,920,155.59 $2,973,787.42 $ 53,631.83 0 0 Page 1of1 ti ul O December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 6a. Chairman's Report-Clam Bay Update-Clam Bay Markers Page 1 of 5 ResnickLisa Subject: 12/7. 6a. Clam Bay Update I"Arrow" Sign at Marker#10 From: KeyesPamela Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 4:03 PM To: ResnickLisa Cc: McAlpinGary Subject: RE: "Arrow" Directional Sign(s) at Marker #10 Hello Lisa, This sign will be posted below the LKR sign and have two arrows (one sign). When looking at the sign there will be an arrow pointing left that says "Pass"and an arrow pointing right that says 13-32. It will be approximately 30 inches long and 12 inches thick. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Thank you, Pamela From: ResnickLisa Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:16 PM To: KeyesPamela Cc: McAlpinGary Subject: "Arrow" Directional Sign(s) at Marker #10 Hello Pamela, I have a few questions about the"arrow"directional sign(s)that will be installed at Marker#10: (one arrow points to Clam Pass/Gulf of Mexico;the other points to#13-32) 1. What is the size of each"arrow"sign?(not sure if this is one or two signs, please clarify) 2. Are they attached to the same post as Marker#10? 3. If so, are they attached above the"#10"or below the"LKR"sign, or? Thanks, Lisa Lisa Resnick Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 605 Naples, FL 34108 Tel. 239.597.1749 Fax 239.597.4502 lresnick(c icolliergov.net http://pelicanbayservicesdivision.net 6a.December Chairman'7,2s 01Report-1 Pelican Clam Bay Bay Services Update Division Clam Board Bay Regular Markers Session Page 2 of 5 .� y �t +crs" ryN r a , F�Y1. ^M, °� f yr,PV Vp°a¢,°'dc -a.�9Y ._ tt,ari+'P r#t I y+sr�' �. +� ; '+Y; J f ', , 1a:,,x s■4,-C +a rt -t . Cau,mn-C'IamIay 1 n r n <.¢ Cc�lwn -!arn Lea',�1y 1 5+ ., � , i - n ar'. �' Left arras! a .�, .`f tr autu.r c, ray r aFA - $ '3#` 'e ' "r .;. , �` - I z .Uri LJ{jr�t '1,..'' r:,,,,--1-3, r av Gaviwn Clem Bay Sipe Y` �,' . , f a Market t1B :1..,.,..44.,:° A caution-Clam Bey Sign - " ar o �Miltkar42 4re t Marker#7 il, • Aviv, "r.� : , n.. d''d y . [.: ilnh yam bat Pign ' �' .'. ,tea ,• Caution-clam By Sign :. tt Marko r alU w, „,. Caution- ClimBaySrgn MarksrlEI .� a., r:'» Caution.Clam Bay Sig r, t, n ? I-r .7:1-� ion -dc-,: R-11 e . � x �{ ti t'drker 44 �t '�! * '` tv7arkerA!' s 'autinr lam Ha Sinn € 1` t te. �" 4y .v qty�4�,'. tit..3 x s 1 °� i_ �1:Uf1 E`d 411 i..•+-t t �� ThaNCTLOCJtsrnz t r r C.LLTBRC1U!it it I 3,`,` a * s ®�� Marker1 .f, A , 5 rr M 2 y ' I.dU;� ":17:.:' .1eF J. r!Y PEi0T0 cL)R`•2DFSC?:Z.Q3.P•^dI7�yC'IDSt�i7 ♦mot -`� 'y i ' - ' i'P (I A'41 PASS NIA '•e ` ,, �X�) S # p ` ev �. '_ iA1rL} . C 0 •(0 a) II m m CO E m as c a) O d O. r � N N N to E 'o N O E c °' o U o o 0) O oa cv 0 �O 4.1.) L I- 5, °co N LU LL co w 11111111.1 a " Z Z j x 9 Q 'J a J U W V O Y December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 6a. Chairman's Report Clam Bay Update Clam Bay Markers Page 4 of 5 1 sor,40'0. it 41, 41 ' '''';'' ,-... riiiti,,, ':.!1-1%.*.i .. „- '. -:-Ift ' 4,,,,„; i: .,,,, , , . :, !1.4te,,pf,., aY' s{' rte i7f' J y `� .� y�7{ . .a'Ptti ` alq.t...,.....„„, .A . . •'-fii-v.„0..." it-A ..r. 4'. 4• ,''• . - .-.,-.4 i t _. 's •.z }i :r,..A, _- 1 . . tr� +�r'�. 2;. •,-,.,,,,,,,tt..., 4.1 taerd,1.. 4 =.".,,''. ..., ''''S, . '', t-.14 ' 4 , .,,, ,,,,,.__,,,,,,,,,, . ,,,,,., 1,,,, ,,I , • /* 4 i • A ' it „ ''''..0`. Y e--y 4E �r 4. u k. -+:; 4.-r , j. v 4-�" Ai,,,,,...'" s { .r# `Aye ; 71 . i um i t a . 2 •a" 1" '''',V"?-'1''..1;- 1�: d � , sit'� �.r•. -:-...,:',/:...,i..: ..:.,,,t,t),_ . .?-..,, Kip, - ;,.t--' -'\A'..?; 23 n " itF a s fi4 YL S ? ,-.41-,:-.:44-;,,.44...4.--..„.•5 t =3, Y� era ad3 ! e"' ' e• s, �` A i, ill p W �. 4 4 b bt .9� a $3 N t L �, A CLAM BAY -Markers 13-32 � ' : �� „• 3 r c 0 .0 0 `m ` 0 rn.. 0 a a CO m CO• m c E o va w m o_ O T co CD N E .7Y m N N Co U • t CL D } J E) � < i a N ? z wee E 1— . z 0 Q E W U i 0 ° E— 3 Z �Z Q ? � 1_ Z re W V J N c I gm° ? a a) a vi O ce(I � H � � 0 � a N m as M W lA 2 Y V J Q W 'L U N m December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 6a. Chairman's Report-Clam Bay Update-Foundation's Recommendation Page 1 of 1 From:ResnickLisa Sent:Wednesday,December 07,2011 8:17 AM To:Dave Trecker(djtrecker @yahoo.com);Donna Cox(Donna.Cox @waldorfastoria.com);Geoffrey S.Gibson (josiegeoff @aol.com);Hansen,Hunter H.(Hunter.Hansen @waldorfastoria.com);Jim Powers(jim @dmgfl.com);John Baron (jbaron @watersideshops.com);John Iaizzo(iaizzo @comcast.net);John P.Chandler(johnchandler219 @gmail.com);Keith J. Dallas(keithdallas @comcast.net);Karen McIntyre;LukaszKyle;Mary Anne Womble(Teedupl @aol.com); McCaughtryMary;Mike Levy(mikelevy435 @gmail.com);ResnickLisa;Susan O'Brien(naplessusan @comcast.net);Tom Cravens(nfn16799 @naples.net) Subject: *IMPORTANT*PLEASE READ FOR TODAY'S MEETING* Dear Pelican Bay Services Division Board: On behalf of Chairman Dallas,please read the emails below prior to today's meeting. The item will be discussed first thing! Thanks,Lisa From:Keith Dallas[mailto:keithdallas@comcast.net] Sent:Tuesday,December 06,2011 5:40 PM To:ResnickLisa Cc:Neil Dorrill;Steve Feldhaus Subject:Fwd:here it is Lisa, The Foundation is recommending the PBSD,in conjunction with the County, take the action below regarding Clam Bay canoe markers.I think the language below is self explanatory.I will have it presented under my Chairman's Report,Clam Bay Update.However timing wise I plan to move it at the meeting to right after the Agenda Approval.Make sure everyone knows this is being discussed and if possible has had a chance to read it before the meeting. Keith Begin forwarded message: From: "Feldhaus,Stephen"<sf(feldhauslaw.com> Date:December 6,2011 5:20:05 PM EST To:Keith Dallas<keithdallasacomcast.net> Subject:here it is Steve Feldhaus,the Chairman of the Pelican Bay Foundation's Ad Hoc Committee on Clam Bay,intends to present to the PBSD Board tomorrow the recommendation of the Foundation that the PBSD modify the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan by amending the reference on pages 38 and 39 that currently reads: "Finally,the main channel will be marked in accordance with the requirements imposed by the United States Coast Guard to ensure that those who use the system clearly know where the channel is and the prohibitions of operating their water craft outside the same." The Foundation believes that,in light of the action taken by the Board of County Commissioners at its June 15 meeting to approve the canoe trail markers and related informational signs,in light of the approvals given for the installation of such signs by the Florida Fish&Wildlife Conservation Commission,by the United States Coast Guard,and by the Army Corps of Engineers,and in light of the notice of intent to issue an exemption and proprietary consent for such canoe trail markers and signs by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection,it would be appropriate for the PBSD formally to amend the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan by deleting the sentence cited above and by inserting in lieu thereof a section describing the signs and markers as approved by the BCC,the FWL,the USCG,the ACOE,and which are the subject of the FDEP's notice of intent to issue an exemption and proprietary consent. Mr.Feldhaus indicates that the Foundation further recommends that the PBSD work closely with County staff and with the County Attorney to ensure that any such modification is done properly and openly. Mr.Feldhaus,who continues to work closely with the County on Clam Bay matters in his role representing the Foundation,has offered to work with the PBSD,on behalf of the Foundation,in the planning of the recommended modification. December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session A 7. Committee Reports I Clam Bay Subcommittee Report by D.Trecker,Chairman Page 1 of 3 TO: PBSD Directors FROM: Dave Trecker Clam Bay Subcommittee SUBJECT: Clam Pass Dredging DATE: December 5,2011 This is a brief update on the permit application for Clam Pass dredging. Collier County (Coastal Zone Management),in consultation with the Pelican Bay Foundation,applied earlier this year for a 10-year maintenance permit to dredge Clam Pass.The permit request [SAJ-1996-02789(IP-LAE)] was directed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(FDEP). The stated purpose: "Conduct periodic maintenance dredging over 10 years in the Clam Pass/Clam Bay for ecological improvement of this estuary,with re-utilization of suitable dredged materials for beach re-nourishment." Clam Pass was previously dredged between 1981 and 1998 to reopen the pass when closed by sedimentation and in 1999,2002 and 2007 as part of a regular maintenance program. The current permit request would allow periodic maintenance dredging of a 80-foot-wide entrance cut to "an historic target depth"of 3.6—5.1 feet at mean low water. Maps appended to the request specify the template—width and depth of dredging Clam Pass and the inlet extending inland 1,800 lineal feet to the start of waterways leading south to Outer Clam Bay and north through the mangroves to Inner Clam Bay.This is comparable to the actual dredging carried out in 2007. The permit request is silent on"triggers"—conditions that would justify or require future dredging. However,a response to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) specified,"Periodic dredging of Clam Pass is `triggered' to occur when the average cross sectional area within the active portion of dredge template is consistently below 200 sq.ft.(2007 Humiston & Moore Monitoring Report).Tidal prism and phase lag will also be monitored and O m ti 0 0 O N N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7. Committee Reports I Clam Bay Subcommittee Report by D.Trecker,Chairman • Page 2 of 3 used as indicators of when dredging is required.Monitoring and maintenance of the pass will be initiated by cooperative agreement between Collier County and Pelican Bay." The so-called "triggers" were based on data analyses by and recommendations from coastal engineering experts—Humiston & Moore, Atkins and Olsen Associates. It is unclear whether the response to the USFWS qualifies as an amendment to the permit application. It probably doesn't matter,because the "triggers" are largely subjective.No metric limits are assigned to tidal range and phase lag changes,and no length of time is specified for the cross-sectional template to be below 200 sq.ft.When Clam Pass is dredged would be a • judgment call by the County and Foundation,presumably with guidance from their consultants. Critics of the permit request say an 80-ft.entrance cut is excessive; a less invasive 40-ft. cut would suffice.They also urge that biological monitoring be part of the permit. Some say "triggers" for dredging should include biological considerations. All parties agree periodic dredging of Clam Pass is necessary. Most agree the 1999,2002 and 2007 dredgings enhanced the health of the estuary. Most also agree dredging is not needed at this time, since the estuary is healthy and current flushing is adequate. My take on the situation is as follows. While an 80-ft.entrance cut may be excessive,it apparently does no harm.The 2007 dredge,which used an 80-ft.cut,did little if any damage to Clam Bay. It was a net plus.The estuary remains healthy. Because the allowed dredging would not extend far inland,it should not lead to more boat traffic in the interior bays. Outer Clam Bay would remain shallow; Seagate would still have trouble getting its big powerboats to the Gulf. There is no evidence the allowed dredging would portend future "navigational dredging" in Clam Bay or inter-bay flushing of Moorings 0 0 m 0 0 0 N 0 N December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 7. Committee Reports I Clam Bay Subcommittee Report by D.Trecker,Chairman Page 3 of 3 Bay,both of which I assume would be vigorously opposed by everyone in Pelican Bay. It is my understanding that permit approval awaits two biological opinions— one from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (for the FDEP) and one from the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (for the USACE). No action of the PBSD board is required or recommended at this time. O 0 m 0 rl N u1 O N VI December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 9a. New Business-Our Health in Pelican Bay(M.A.Womble) Page 1 of 1 • Our Health in Pelican Bay 1nfr duc>ttan A continuing discussion here in Pelican Bay concerns the need for a barrier along route 41. Discussions have,for the most part,focused on the need for,a barrier,but only as it relates to two issues,increased security and the reduction of noise.There is another portion of the barrier debate that has drawn little attention. A..,.Tailuiue Pollution Multiple studies have concluded that people living near highways are exposed to vehicle emissions known as"tailpipe pollution".This includes elevated levels of ultra fine particulates,black carbon,nitrogen and sulfur oxides,hydrocarbons, heavy metals, etc..These studies have been published by respected organizations such as the US Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. B...The Effect on Health These same studies have linked tailpipe pollution to increases in asthma,heart disease,cancer,bronchitis,autism, atherosclerosis,Alzheimer's,and a general shortening of life spans.These health problems more severely affect the very young and also,older individuals. C. The Pollution"Blanket" These studies also conclude that this tailpipe pollution spreads lice a blanket across areas adjacent to highways.Of course, concentrations are more severe closer to a highway and pollution dissipates as it moves further and further away from the source.By the same token,studies have shown that toxic pollution travels up to one and one half miles from a highway. This easily covers all of Pelican Bay including someone walking on the berm. D. Prevention The US Environmental Protection Agency concluded that highway barriers trapped pollutants,channeling them up and away.it was found that barriers generated a significant reduction of pollution in neighborhoods adjacent to highways. L Hinhwav 41 Collier County estimated that in 2010 the annual vehicle count,passing Pelican Bay was seventeen million,one hundred thirteen thousand. (An example of the extent of tailpipe pollution....The exhaust from a Pruis emits.334 pounds of CO2 per mile.It's 2 miles past Pelican Bay....2 miles X.334 pounds X 17 million vehicles is 11,400,000 pounds of tailpipe pollution released each year right next door to our community. ...&that's just the CO2 part) The unfortunate thing is that most of us are not aware that this pollution may be destroying our health.and the toll it's taking on our bodies.It's in the air that we breathe as we bike,stroll or simply sit on a lanai.It's affecting our health,ever so slowly,but so very surely,day,after day,after day. The need for a barrier is a very complicated issue.All the more reason to engage the appropriate experts,so that they can provide professional guidance to the Strategic Planning Committee and the Board. This should be a comprehensive review of not just the sound issue but also an evaluation of a barrier as it relates to security and to the health risks to our community. This professional advice can be evaluated and a decision made either to construct a barrier,or not.One way or the other,it will be a decision that is based upon a solid foundation of expert advice,not speculation, semi-professional input or emotion.. Dave Ritger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C a) I— O wart1TrTris 1uu■■u■■ sa ■c.'W�,'4 ■ y .■u■.■i r•,a• n■wo■u■cio ■annournavnnta ■■myna �' •cwCCR .a %iu�iiiilc ii% ■■ ■� Iii uuauuutii i7a.u.■.u„..ct}!J! ■i r■ �o uC r 2^1 u■■■■■■■UOOU ■CTT1 T1tT = TI 1 ■u1■1■■11 1u a.iuu.u..i L1 •b!•0 o c 1La i ililiuii■1ED 1 V.= '� UI2 J1 ■u■i=iii■ ■■u. u■1 Ii .■ 1 o =r = IC_1 i11■■1:IIIJIl[IC$r) 1■■i■r ■■1■• ■■111 ■111 1S Ni1111 11■11■ a - ■i..4. 1 ■ta1■f11•■11E:n ■■1111i►iYGW1ifieiri-iris 44NtrY■1■■■■ ■1u/■1■i1 MUODU UJ■ ut■■■■i -cs - ODU CI,000 OM 0000I0 • t COENIGIJU4 UODU ©GUU :1.1110 00301 . OODOU °w a w c 1111.11111111111111111 AIME to 0 I;;IiIi"! ° E i_.`il(hlll1illl U i N _ O , c 0 ,,,al nisi . ..o : -----jr—a pm t i _ o>o. a)w IN: a " C 0 N.> > 0 t; 4 I.,:i'41,,LL1 I 4711 1 7----7 . N N• U UZ 1■ 0)�. 1 m m � _ M c c m co.0 U 'Q)CL CL . O a) ' , CV C N i f� 7 N } m_ 45 3 o I E Z°' 0 rn d . _ �1 � 1 1 1111111111M : � O. _..._ ' 2 is ,„:„.,,,,, .. . ... L,,, 14.10,,,,,,,,, . 41„, .. z . Hum, , .'4- ► ,• ihrial • • C a) Co- b ui C O a -o Q 4) C a) 0 C c E E O U r.t r // CO C Q O O .N Na a) (/) c W U 0.3 CI CU(f) III/11 1111111111 1 ' IY / E U e co C 11 1111 Pi 5 r C tie a) C CO __ @ I9 m .. CO C C (6 . .„.... 0 .0 T.)d S a ' .' C.; gt a N . .-- .. it, alCy ca c,ti N N L e ' a it . a c N. e `'2 s t1 Iii 'i ....1 MI All ,,, aS h m ?; :I s -“,.— , - � $z _- ^------ 1 111111 i s,.+ .rr.XGti,►1+P ,r,,�irr ..y-.rr_=r5r.�,r. C�r -.. ,nr.a.-.rte=. i.,a Z, Z �. ; tt LLtRy■ i oo 'e 3 r r - _ . 1:_ °` I 7 X 11111 r • • i iy c r It .L..a` lie..,.0._.ah-; December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 10. Audience Comments(B.Beauchamp) Page 1 of 1 RbsnickLisa Subject: 12/7/11 10. Audience Comments(B. Beauchamp) Original Message From:brucebeauchamp@cox.net f mailto:brucebeauchampna,cox.netl Sent: Monday,December 05,2011 11:58 AM To: ResnickLisa Subject: Fwd: Pelican Bay Blv. Paving >Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:54:22-0500 >From: <brucebeauchamp @cox.net> >To: lresnick @collieergov.net >Subject: Pelican Bay Blv. Paving >To whom it may concern: >I am a resident of Pelican Bay who happened to run a paving company for 25 years in Rhode Island . I read an article in a recent Pelican Bay Newsletter recently which indicated that the Service Div.was contemplating forwarding the funds to the County to pave Pelican Bay Blvd. earlier than the anticipated scheduled paving in 2016. > I rode the length of the Blvd.with the expressed purpose of observing defects. I saw no settlements,cracks,or other deficiency that could warrent an early paving schedule. It appears that the only deficiency is cosmetic. I believe that there is no need to accelerate the paving schedule. > I would appreciate being notified of any underlying deficiencies of which I am not aware . >I am also concerned about the quality of the paving at the new cross-walks being installed. The pavement that was installed at the intersection of Oakmont,and Pelican Bay Blvd.N appears to be of a finer texture than normal and the quality of the installation is substandard. > I appreciate your consideration of my concerns. >Yours truly, >Bruce A.Beauchamp >7058 Barrington Circle Unit 102 >Naples Fl. 34102 >Tel 401-996-9474 December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 10. Audience Comments(J.Doyle and S.Doyle re:5e. Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing) Page 1 of 2 From:naplespatriots @comcast.net[mailto:naplespatriots @ comcast.net] Sent:Wednesday,December 07,2011 11:15 AM To:office@ pelicanbayservicesdivision.net;keithdallas @comcast.net Subject:Re:PBSD--12/07/2011 Agenda Item--Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status--Cash FlowAnalysis Mr.Dallas, Upon reviewing the Cash Flow Analysis,we do not see the repayment of the loan from the county in 2015. From:naplespatriots @comcast.net To:office@ pelicanbayservicesdivision.net,keithdallas @comcast.net Cc:nfn16799 @naples.net,jbaron @watersideshops.com,johnchandler219 @gmail.com,josiegeoff @aol.com,iaizzo @comcast.net, mikelevy435 @gmail.com,naplessusan @comcast.net,djtrecker @yahoo.com,teedupl @aol.com,"hunter hansen" <hunter.hansen @waldorfastoria.com>,donnafiala @colliergov.net,georgiahiller @colliergov.net,tomhenning @colliergov.net, fredcoyle @colliergov.net,jimcolletta @colliergov.net,johnsusanboland @aol.com Sent:Monday,December 5,2011 11:33:13 PM Subject:PBSD--12/07/2011 Agenda Item--Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status-Audience Comment Mr.Dallas: RE: Agenda Item 5(e)Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing Status We very much like the idea proposed in the letter from PBPOA President Susan Boland to Keith Dallas dated 11/16/2011 regarding the need to have the proposed$1.5M loan for the resurfacing secured by the 12 acres of county land within Pelican Bay should the PBSD remain obstinate and decide to pursue the resurfacing project in 2012. Another possibility would be to have the county deed all of the roads within the Pelican Bay MSTBU to the Pelican Bay Foundation so that we can privatize them since the net effect here is that Pelican Bay residents may be forced to maintain these roads should the economy deteriorate further and the county finances collapse. Joseph T.Doyle Sandra J.Doyle Laurel Oaks/Pelican Bay From:naplespatriots @comcast.net To:office@ pelicanbayservicesdivision.net,keithdallas @comcast.net Cc:jlytle @naplesnews.com,nfn16799 @naples.net,jbaron @watersideshops.com,johnchandler219 @gmail.com,josiegeoff @aol.com, iaizzo @comcast.net,mikelevy435 @gmail.com,naplessusan @comcast.net,djtrecker @yahoo.com,teedupl @aol.com,"hunter hansen" <hunter.hansen @waldorfastoria.com>,donnafiala @colliergov.net,georgiahiller @colliergov.net,tomhenning @colliergov.net, fredcoyle @colliergov.net,jimcolletta @colliergov.net,johnsusanboland @aol.com Sent:Wednesday,November 2,2011 8:59:21 AM Subject:PBSD--11/02/2011 Agenda Item--Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing-Audience Comment Mr.Dallas: RE:Agenda Item 4 e) Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing We once again restate our objection to the early resurfacing of Pelican Bay Boulevard via a loan to Collier County as submitted as an audience comment for the October 2011 PBSD Board Meeting and outlined in this email stream for your reference. The new information provided by Mr.Chandler for the November 2011 meeting regarding the Collier County credit ratings is irrelevant to the issue at hand. We are not questioning the current credit-worthiness of Collier County. However,I would point out that the imminent downgrade of the credit rating of the federal U.S.Government projected for late November or early December could negatively impact local and state governments. And there is a possiblilty that the credit-worthiness of Collier County could deteriorate over the 4-year period of the proposed loan if this economic recession persists. More importantly,REAL issue here is that the board's scheme to repave Pelican Bay Boulevard ahead of the Collier County schedule by using CIP funds represents a material conversion of dollars for an item(resurfacing)that is not part of the CIP plan. Furthermore,the funds for resurfacing should rightfully come from the Collier County Gas Tax Revenues. The loan scheme in effect amounts to double taxation to the Pelican Bay December 7,2011 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session 10. Audience Comments(J.Doyle and S.Doyle re:5e.Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing) Page 2 of 2 Homeowners since the proposal bypasses the gasoline funds by using the CIP reserves. Finally,we do not believe that the PBSD Board would have the authority to use the CIP funds for resurfacing without the consent of the Pelican Bay Homeowners in the form of a special referendum. Joseph T.Doyle Sandra J.Doyle Laurel Oaks/Pelican Bay From:naplespatriots @comcast.net To:office@ pelicanbayservicesdivision.net,keithdallas @comcast.net Cc:jlytle @naplesnews.com,nfn16799 @naples.net,jbaron @watersideshops.com,johnchandler219 @gmail.com,josiegeoff @aol.com, iaizzo @comcast.net,mikelevy435 @gmail.com,naplessusan @comcast.net,djtrecker @yahoo.com,teedupl @aol.com,"hunter hansen" <hunter.hansen @waldorfastoria.com>,donnafiala @colliergov.net,georgiahiller @colliergov.net,tomhenning @colliergov.net, fredcoyle @colliergov.net,jimcolletta @colliergov.net,johnsusanboland @aol.com Sent:Wednesday,October 5,2011 9:32:23 AM Subject:PBSD--10/05/2011 Agenda Item--Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing-Audience Comment Mr.Dallas: Agenda Item 4 e)Pelican Bay Boulevard Resurfacing We endorse Mr.Levy's position in his 9/26/2011 email to the PBSD Board regarding the board's scheme to repave Pelican Bay Boulevard ahead of the Collier County schedule. If Pelican Bay chooses to do the resurfacing now(2012),two years before it is scheduled to be done,we would have to lend the county money for five years.We would be lending from funds currently reserved for the CIP,for something that is not,and never was,a part of our CIP plan.This,in turn,would complicate PBSD CIP implementation;and would most likely delay execution of CIP projects. We are in favor of leaving the repaving of Pelican Bay Boulevard to be done on the county's schedule(2014),using normal county funds--from the gas tax. Additionally,I would like to point out to the PBSD board and the Collier BCC that advancing the resurfacing of Pelican Bay Boulevard is unfair to other citizens of Collier County since it gives the appearance of"jumping ahead in line"for other county road resurfacing needs. These types of underhanded actions makes Pelican Bay look like a bunch of rich brats who get priority over the poorer residents of Collier County. Joseph Doyle Sandy Doyle Laurel Oaks/Pelican Bay From:naplespatriots @comcast.net To:office@ pelicanbayservicesdivision.net,office@ pelicanbayservicesdivision.net,keithdallas @comcast.net Cc:jlytle @naplesnews.com,nfn16799 @naples.net,jbaron @watersideshops.com,johnchandler219 @gmail.com,josiegeoff @aol.com,"hunter hansen"<hunter.hansen @hilton.com>,iaizzo @comcast.net,4mikelevy @embarqmail.com,naplessusan @comcast.net,djtrecker @yahoo.com, teedupl @aol.com,donnafiala @colliergov.net,georgiahiller @colliergov.net,tomhenning @colliergov.net,fredcoyle @colliergov.net, jimcolletta @colliergov.net Sent:Wednesday,October 5,2011 6:50:59 AM Subject:Pelican Bay Services Division Untimely Postings and Communications Mr.Dallas, I find that your new system regarding audience participation in Pelican Bay Services Division business matters is inadequate. At the past several meetings you have instructed the audience that you would prefer to solicit input either in advance of PBSD meetings OR during the discussion of a specific item during the meeting. However,as of 6am this morning,neither the statutory required meeting notice nor an advance agenda have been posted to the PBSD website--and the meeting is today,October 5th at fpm. I would hardly call this participatory government. In fact,the residents of a communist country would appear to get more consideration than we do here in Pelican Bay! Joseph Doyle Sandy Doyle Laurel Oaks/Pelican Bay c 0 N a) as u 'm `m L" a pa)m II p a; us 03 a) 73 U c- (1) T N CO T m N fn 1 cU m , U -c oto •H 5 „,,..„ pi, m .— o L a)) 0 m a � a 0 0 ',,,,,,„,,,, , (,) Lon imorm c 0 a) as (.1) •m a m acs)) l- et T 'c -gyp it,1 • co a) o C m a) c d) O N .co ii li o a) U as o U• O- 4)a) T 4.....j Vagi 0 • m 0 rot a m m et Tut. as c5 U ' imam �1� • N N MOM C '.7 mow E N a) U N arm o CO a it 41"111 CO CA 11114 I> ® inn."' Ciln 2 c , cu 4.4 • Ca) et , ,...* CI41 rim* ;1•11 W CV ell 0 el 1 Co) 5 4 Eiii. OC an tam as m a m aQ1i I— 10 o o egli .6.0 to o a).u) o a) N O a u)i m m E m U �qg rtis U ' 1� TD °o N u) E ...c. cl) pw 0 4 as _ E v wirook N O w a _r M bow• O co � tin > . oak 0 41h 0 CA •roil .' 111 2 o ,r) .., i ,,,,„,,,to ittiii ,..., et ..„ ,„: kiiii) iii- u ‘,„-, 0 cu >IN •24 •,..• c.,) ‘14-6 ;..., cli, ft 0 bowialt 7.4 E c?:, cr ring p C 0 7 a co N N H a o w Pass* 0 P1614 Tit co C m o a O w et fl 14.1 M m m et wan* cU ri) E 5 m , ^ �.t ,- El m N C part bear. U rt > E V room 45 -C O U . 70 1�irirt D oa n17: CZ 14.1601 Oi 2 (......) ric$ CU E 74 WOW C114 0 Ea* Cin M 0)1 4a) bt M. Can a 0 .N u) .(Ti mCC 7 0 rn� 0 w o on N w (1'6..4 cd ' 4,mi r„.. . 7-.. :- c . o (10) 4imat w j U) (z3 Imiiiiist m E m0 - m U a a ,. o m mom N r E - lu lairaii w m a) 0 a) O co d co viimigi (10) P"� P731,,,,,, l'' ,..... 2 Li" ,- .,,,,D,,, et ez4 cs.? ii: 0 ,',''''-'' '''''''''''',; _-_,','' .'; ria"i 0 '...ot'Pt t*le U Clid.. -t At. :- IA ....... Lesso) P1622n4 , . g Pawl E .. ., c ...III C O co N (Q (D co N O -O -0 Id C1J co N O O CO O Ail li U Q = .: u) cr3 m O•PIRA TfU E m co• U e co + a E '4' Y+iiYir¢ .. 1 CO Lin COO = 0 0 ..: 2 L., 0 et L._ _... .., , . ., ,.._.„, ._ ., , w >. , ..,.., ., ,,, ,„_._....,. .., .. . ,, 4.4 .< , .._ p ....... " ni 4116 W Cia Z C 0 .c-1) CD m m 0 a)) I- VG m CO c e AN AA c u.) 0 :� a aco T a) > co m t 14 T (t E pro..4 v C Can CD N 5 - I11 ,_, , ,., r—,u4.14 r3 4 f ft fi = r \ ES 0 /�y 11 14 C UU a) + W : O oa 4 WI `;" � 2 Liiii" r--1 14=1 E000 :0 0 Nior ad to ;Nal ft 0 rug 't-M2)020' \4 74,f) or ■1111 -,---.... 1 tz -§, r i rtfi CA Q rd ,M4 INC '441F 0 •N cn w a3 w •c1-3 `m er • w a°i I— CC -0 a as o w m c c uu) o II _ -. 4 z fi; d m 4 f6 E CO CU 1 co �t U • Q frrr r a) o N 0 �"t ti N _o a3 0 r" i,----, i ) ✓• U o --- F*'I 2., .. t . 1 0 fir► ."r` I I{i �. t IN • c 0 U a) `m a • a) ct T a _0 0 m o CO 0 o a., 0 0j. a n r o T lA m ca E ' ' W: osr4 c U L \ r IV- 1- . i ._v • t 0 o u) N C .1- bilei1011111011. CD• .— Y.r h > ; t T = 4 NINO 4 t 7 ` i t i ff ' I ' l' i c 0 as `m o c .0 -o m 0 m° a) ,r.{ 101'1 ta) o > - «Cin ° f .ilea+ as D ID( Pk,, co ca as wawa U as g «�tit) IX c-5 0 *... et g { eil « - as ,cr U = Zli illayi U c C r� 0 rd I Nair 0 prt '2?4 Z*, 0 ,..16... «® >, rtil ..., .., , •'mai .4.0 ft ,....., Law) •.-•• Cift .4.0 0.71 •rent Z 101 41) bip Lid 3•04 ;04 cza4 run* >%( 009 g o kommoug et U bi) ;.4 E pr4 .•■•4 a • C 0 .(0 c n• `—° ca N 9 rX >9 Q b 00 N d P o N 0• d N. 4.4$ ro P•. i 0 0- c � � •V a) V 444 44'44541Mi 44, .4,4 O a N ' = O E' 1 o • • 44 4 44 ft "' C O .N w U a)� tl/ riot a � �� 0 •r e Paoli N a O c U tiif tvg,1:10$ 5 U V/ p ai lasig AI rid. `v 44 EN • z a) >.• 0 • co . .c.) ,1/4....:n r_ .-1.* cn 4.0 E °' . bA N C warea P. • U U .,y W r ,hi,, ami ,,=-.. Vaair* i 5 cil (i.5,:t 0 cr) 1;1, et. . c) , . CV 4 cv p ,...,,,,,,, . ,,,, tZ, E . , .,5 ;,..4 0 4 .4.1_11-14 c 0 `m • 0 . ct CO m c fie' ' 0.0„, br,,, i.„,..,, *4 o au) yam* it Q r ?.�. • N a) v U fl C4) a) m T co ca m c5 a 0 Ii a 7 i10 i a) ••••• s 0 co � rrs 4 1.41 s+ 0 440 Ur) ra 444301t #44* •}.s{ c a .N cn a) m •F I.M � • a m a a) f- C _o ,C4,4 as bt CO N o c m m o tiO a) • :5a Vmmi psi o a) 13 401114 P2164 ft Ci a) T • m cu E 03 ca Paa.4 c (� wdl co , • d• Q r a) Q' O N ,t, E E ,,i- N C mV O et 0 a) . ° V st 0 w _ V +� a) 0 a) ova 14111.111 (1) > 11.4 tt C6-) . eil.,< 0 114•4 14•14 410 ° CA La) 2 et po 40 W/ 0 cu et cu „„, , ›.0.% ip...., et, —, 0.) et Z; „, , ci) PO 4 Tom( 5 731 ra). ,, rt. >16, .4 cn et .., ..). L.. et 0 eis .. .:. L.) .- — '6...'""‘ U ® 0 0 • r19341 CI r101 C 0 0 CD m '(T, m a us a-, aa) 1-- ct Z.-! -0 CU o m m c a m) c o a) ..(7) ti > — .. - 0 t , i -, ...5!), ,• - (r) co as cwl *)) t . r 0 _ o_ o_ al _ . ., � v I ow .r. ....... , I.1.5.t ,.,. _. ._... . .._,..._4,_—_-3 jii;'' . ll ,r___. �. ,Y_ 1 U 0 a) :o co "4 h:2.. , ,_____ 0 . ........, ___. :____ rx CI p m• e, lt!a2e6a5 r e1 '.14 t 1/411101 t !.' I i t i I N co C' (4,3 i '•---- ri, • .it I '0 ril" .I4 1 11 i' I' ) ' I I' r I 7 I 1 11 J W 1 i t C 0 N N as U 0 "POI I* MI f0 a O m C N C fn r....7, 710 vt ,...0 O •0 .F, a o U —) C6131) rill ANIMA 4°4 W m MINIM A joit 00 m loirw C U • U , OS rem` 0 5t, t No elk ("" U pia E n3 r:: , •vi. a.) Wirmissa N N N '4 ,. zri .L_ O • _o cI3 co IC _ Mow _ 1 � • U U '- T(Do_ — cu ---4 tt wt i.:: Ete* (ad . us') A > 0 5 0 7.i 0 4 . 0 '0-4 0,..) „bisz ,,....i >,.., et 2" (....). ;pi. et et rd ..., c.) .. 0 , ;...) a) . , V1 O rog. cif) ., ____ _ E ip...., ..,. , ;Nei 14•6 p.i cs) tot ,,c ` .r4 E (I) U ›°1 rat 0 A 1 ;0.4 Cl) U C:10 CI') 0 ,,/ , 0 rig et 44 woo° z ,,,,p, „..4%.4 z 0 C ,rt,"';1 61‘b I f3Cljf ,.,,,a,,45,,,..01 a mo‘'' ''44 41 I il l'W(1:7''\ ' 7 I I I I:re i I I 11-(1111j:s,,,o,,1 0 Cl) N U iiet .N a o m m U T 73 001 1 N T om ,,: il rid 11 Wr ti* c U oi Ywrr [ 1_/ a 07,5 �i� a_ Q d N o o N N C _ r U a N. = ,�N N U N U • Ocod Newswo 01) 2 0 - ._ L ,„„ ,..„, 446/IN ,Ilt 1000..‘ = a 14 41 1);4 a 4" 1:ajb4 mil, >'‘ ri49 ost..., *............. U ft\-7, bt a co H I- ^ ' m W aa a) a V o o m m g o . .co !DID 0 d N 4F, 46014$ a !� •10 •Z = V C a) m m IiiYY®Yr ra Ciii) ,IC on m of et CU ,� 0 CL a r" CIAILI o ) N. E .- Loola) C k. a) 0 a) Cotl* 4111 4.4 *obi a) 03 = co a 0 ed cn 2 ,et CNI CU + A b ) it -----, til-a o 7 S� ., .< .riot 0 1,41,4 ra 411 14•10 v •1,..4 G rmi 0 GO .4.4 r..-4 cn Z 0 ......., U (A •ri-4 t .O , U) c0 •F3 iii t: a o RS 0 o � T Q a) U c4 U a s m ca t m m U e+U a suo1;3a ssoaD umrigi(inb3 7 cc l t t _ O 9 I] N C � 1 p11�" 1 a) a3 v.fix y 0 4...4 IYM1Yri ti) f 1 wR `a V i U ) CI) N A§# l+.0 0 VJ}� r r e r I !1) U ..r } U Q (z LLI a. S f.J O C O O v O O O r = O O O O p oesnu`itoolan wntw¢iq , - 'r• ??. m..,t v4«..p mss+._y,„ws. Tws. C 0 '� a) 1- CO 'Ei m c CT) a) a) I . 3 72 mo C a� c 0 o a) I �� [.., 7 ©0e. ...E 1°�z co co 1/411 m 6ui6 a�a L OZ�I _ ._ ____. ____ 9��G> • . S0OZ - ._._ — 4 V — a) O LL o E) 0 1 (v i ti ca V vJ 1 LLI b` O E -c oN 1 O 1 • U z ` N 0 o CO 0- � 0..) N r < -., ,, = 0 H Z77.61D' —" , .111111111 — 1 o U °o C N ca rn ill11111111111111111111111111111 V" W '_ �`� 0 L. ;s. moIs I I I ! ti ca ° (.L3dd)3JNV 11vall c 0 Cl)• a) as m u) w a) I- Ce a a `m 0 o m m m c C CO Oar .c a D a? cn al a) - O a- a) Nrai# IS co• as cU •� o CL a o c N C al '4" (1400) bikini& O a)• U• a) f� 0 4:104 2.,, trom) et 0 .1._ , . rco, 4 ov...1 i...,_ = 401.4 .000- .„,„...,, ,:„„,. ...,t „,,,e. ,i,... , ,,., >,,,, 000) woo 000 tto„ to cr .t. +mai 01111111.1* = iimuie tit "L. :4 vide emi VJ trimiera U •Poi ...1 tsn 40 ;6%1° 0 117,..f...9 Vii WON C 0 •-th. N a) co .f0 f0 LX N N I- CL v -0 0 N 0 .( V 4.4 w eL b 0 �� • 0 •E mom u) co• cu t E Oilill*N ci.) 4 a H toiii, .4..... .,...., 0, 1,., 4. ,,, u 1,.. ft ciiie z 0 d et bt — It• oN N C I— ti (0 tiiiiii E• = N ' v CJ CD ay as rd VP Cr) en 0 to CL 0 rj7) (10) (1) 0 PI* .„, 2 (.....) rt o ,..4 .rill 0.11*%1 .210( 1410011 140 a (73 14 4144 0 •post Cr >444, VJ 0 ‘00 414 la03516' 0 P'164 ft erir 400 000.000 'Z 4 U 'it c.J 0.) 4 .,. ' r- 01) 0 1.4 7.5, •'', .., 4.4 E ,...,100 0 raml in 0 cn a) a3 CO m a) cp s c6Ti; o m m C d) o E cn -El ell m U T co 0 C71 tsw- N E co m c (j V a) O C aa) U a) O U Z W Q L I- D v ro W N Q W O ar 2 N \ / Q U V, m CC >- T-1 a p � 2 2 L., el co Q ■ a ^ J � � • 3 2 i aZO3 `° 2 J o ,� .r -j u a V O w Y >44' .001,147 rik- h..........., U C O .N N 0 as 411 #00 o Ca C 122) o0 • > o ft fitl � a- . a •� C m 0 !- CO 0 -I co E al) 3.4 — ,r, 03 Willi* m V r 4"1:1 1:4":tc 1 t7,' ' O, CIO) as CL 111.111111K o ,,) NIMIONIMit N C h: (IS .1. (1464) . r i O Line r Vaaaai . irt: -i (141.1) ramq .r284 o 6100- ri- 111011.1°3 hilii11111it MI 4 >Ilk jest rg vita V/ p....4 (..) ® 1 et et 4.4 ;Iiist Ilig°' c 0 ,N Ca) PIZ m tast) ,144 m 0 N a�i I- 1111110110 0 P1114 1404 owl tel 1 a) m v14, ° CO c 0 30 ar 1,-% , V) 04 ',..itela o a) cit Imo. 1 U °- N m »�Y11 a(n a iii f0 E a 0..0......o r� t No Ed imam EUG) ova = E 4 Ild 2 Li„,,, c..„ g.,, „ ,..., ,...., ... ,,,,,, Q., ,..., **Mil CO 4 ....... o ...... cox fte:,,, r"` „1, U C O .N y co •m V f6 T 7 I-N J T�i�'—�7t` a c Aw o �N a: w c_e3 cii,) ,..., ,,,,,, , ,r,-- .2 ' ,,„,...0 5 N T m ‘ ,...„, w, > co N ' U s� . . �� a -rim ' CIO) fit oN N 14 4.• 0 ; .r 1 -4 hemmer itIJ C r-: 2 ..4- u ew >-"A " 'Pos4 E JO 1 2 Liii) ..„ .... ,,„ . ., , , ,..., „.., .4...... = ,...., — ‘3,, )„... .„.._ , . , . CU >rill4k c•114 ft °411'.1 1 . "Ft) cn a ' o rall" Lin Tueta4 (14"41 Can r ma *A wiow "Zol 0.00010.... (lc)) cal iom A 1 bisoussaiii roll 0 7••4 rAw1:1 COI 0 Cl). co a) m fij i• n CC 2, a `m 0 m vow m c c o .N i. co 0 col) 0 a) 0 N T (> m mco E 8 . o . U tumit 6466$ w • as ,� E 0 a. D c• fia _ Orai ft LID :''' 2 . , , , f , _., ,11., , >, r, Qs, ,,,, ,- . .. �, . r A L.,Pft. turd 16194 CI) rid rl >`' i?..., tu.n It"84 %...........r U 16,4 v.,C, 44, ""7..--..-- yt4 .61>41 4'.. . i to5 n: 4. * f'47r.4-4 ri r'''';')` 4' ':0074.,:., clh'''' Tsai Cid #6°64 r"4 N Cr) c a Cl, N N t6.l, Z6 cC �� CI) 144 • co CI* 0 48111 romoi • c m O w 4e4 et_ _ . � r.„,„.... ,... ..... . • o � fl ‘.4.4 cn co V Cif U % OW) I4 0 CIJ 0 ft ell VW N m co f0 O •yowl a *Iwo .- " CJ o N r N '".7: .4 ,..c1 t;:g C r N V Zr) L O U mem& N -c N \ . Cse a) 03 C13 40014 .„,,„ Li, .4...) 41.4r 1 CU a „.f, ,i.) ,. CU Z4t4.4 0 o tat) '4'4;124 et MI E C O • N � Co ' (6 Cis) ft (0 cC 71 11111A.0 U CD I- tit f0 c m CC 2.7 4100777,4 'el. C ft aw<^ CQ 6 a N f0 0?IAN ;MI Cl U)H elm ca E m co bearsi C ad : a a o rnrrrr CZ N (Ti Clettl Li) k. mom D Cs) "NgAamj a 441"1 10,410 TA = 0 77-vw,T7 4, 0 2 . , • r , (... • (in °s, r.:1•a CI ro brwriem tt. 4 r44* 454 et C 0 h A i et -° -0 �i/ • m 5 .. m m 0 ,i_, C VU m O o r/ cu_ � � v� a c0 et et o ca cU O et o � N ` ' 7.1 C 1 l �1 cam• •*-f O r• ��o a 0 •rl Z O to TNZ 11•41 1■4 2. (....7 •!...( 4.. C o ; 0) Clio w et r" 0 4 *4 U IIIC:$ o H O 4 z C O N (Ti —. N as O i ;' CD N O 0. -. 0) N CU f0 _ f6 m m V 0 , 140 c U rttes24 ?my en miiiiit • ilo c0i U m D co c/J �1ir/ a tiia/ 2, :, .. c„... 1, ,,,,,, . ,„‘,L, rot vas" Tamm4 rt L.) .r...4 >,,,,tr° Ogg .:, r.. C _o ca CD m E a CO m C N � ^ ' . s Cad o - W a o Z "�{ rt a) litC kamil clO cnm 0 0 COE U . lrrc 0 TD a m N ' C r lfrrirwa i- E - 0 et t ova CU "* psi 0 Cin CU Cnritt CU 71 ay •� (4. 2 rig cu cin .„..4 .4-4 — a) •4•,1 CJA) .1.0 0 tioe U 0 con et rt:$ E 0 v a) CU > IviZ rel. 0 rommeg cn u C 0 CO m a co m as RS Q0 c c co vivo, Oak, o .0 1 d 1^ . T CO c,3 CO _• E ccaU MONK ware Cot cuNifD . 0,,, . 04, 0 Wati ',..#4. CL a m rid 01 i N C _ biaiiiiiiiMik f6 V i f6 co E -c U 44,0 D a too' el 1 = ‘44/140 tAA terber ,...., 0.4 m ri old titalq` f%16. 3 !el 01 er614 Cud A Q0) rj.) 11146164_, ,......„..... (wei j OW% .„. .4.' ,0,0, wviidt cid *NM ow b 'PalMii PIN, c 0 .N v, a) m u) 'ca raj cam = a m W a a m 0 m 2 • C rn O a. .U) EL et 4 ail) 4iiiij a• ct *iti Is) 148 C*1 • as CO co 41111441i m m { c 0 0 •1604 o .F a .� rrrrrre 1�3 uima O ,r, �iI N C p U `7� * Wes/ L M • liar o co a bilimmi COI I) poi Ull ft 0 4.4 ct) rags* CI) N 2 ritz - eri 1 Cs) vole Li) >411/4 00% Iffiri C) et 11821 0 N bai (40.0) 0 .(7) N m (f) ' f0 7a m a°i m c o CC) .,z ift d N N ofirwi N„.0 m T 4141 • u) m r co E • ... 03 co •� co CL a m limoco N _ y-in "- U C ,,'''R) E L co mom 7 o . 1.1 4 rir4 ,ell) „..o.v4/:+1) „I 0 ;..., e4) r4 ';''.'4 .1....i ;- ....„..... itti4," .‘"44-* .00.4 VIWI 0.000s0 A } '''''' • • • IIM • 00 00Nw001 U‘lailif 440 ,P3-V r, ,j, end CO 4133 0111IttA , II* "04 05 34%333A Cr, ,941/, 0 r'W c 0 cn cn m m • • To la CO as o co a9 ._ as ' � • pu a II •••••4 e a � Q • C) Cl o N fit"' ram _a (Ts (I) Lii) & %Sr ',-.) V� _ — 41 CO f4 ea) 101.44 � ��.'` 2 Li.,, C) X CU C)et .,,,, tx ... ,,,, '-'4 c'ou Ekr} . u au u et 4.0 14.14‘ CU 14 t.... U 0.) '44 r- o - v a et C 0 0 0 co CO 0 L- -0 CO ^^ � •A I� E CcLO-a -Q.0-). 0 -0 W W� ., r) c5 - c� U) a cn V O o � — U % (q) T co co cli c E5 r" cu c-1-4 .4..) E CL2 Lil 0 CO rid r 4 cn r N , balliii.ilikik E 0 Ern ,.... 4-4 r CO Q Cm) (ICI ••1•■4 M U C • a) r6 m cf) CO ca..4 1.....■4 754 (4en > 0 •CD LI (r) (ail > ei 1E 2% L., .2 r-cj p..., F. 4, 0 4-4 co 0 E 0 .4.- F ° 0 •'--i cu O It ril 0 754 CI) +4 4 r•-• co ,.......... u to cz5 .-1 ,5 '5 O O x „.___i E ,....2 %.4-1 cu a) -- , .2 4 - ' ,4 O O ccl O O C 0 .N co N (6 f0 m -a •Poll CO O C OD Cu, II VIZI ;t524 et • a CV N > • m N T bt 03 E wow, 133 as rio, U rd iF 0 tlit) • N hu U V Ti, ft=-• 0 v 0 2, Li, N : O 0 ch C 110■01•111111. 14114 tit if) tz 0 el 0 C o .N N Cr) '(T3 f0 W 7 a N W a m v o ) 0] C m c m II to m s Z� ' nove N T N E m N ±)U ` r" isl v aa ram C) N N C r , flUE f • '''''''''''......c::::) :110 2. L, , , el ri) >,. r9 ,,,,„,,,,,,,„,,,4 rill c a .N co a) m m c Cr li v Pa� ) v • co m ;I. • 0 0 a , 11171 : ell NC a) 1:5 .0 D c� •41111 rim. •414 up m m0 TI4n r" ._ a rill' r�9 _ V *. N: Eas � 0 n 'm o cuL '1" �, o CJ m + CL I) U V/ ova 14 •� 4 kin .000 2 t...." Pri mi- •,.....4 cJ pii., po ...C;) ;tang Pt% Cid b Cin (litN" 111:1611 COI >1'1 1011 fit ;4114 C ten,. cid u (At ' ..( itX o 0 0 '11 el et tt U cis-, 4.4 L........3 FEN4 c 0 'U) CD as 'm CO CC 7 a m aa)) I— Lb eniti a -0 o co c o %4 . o .(7) ci_ pasiti vtli N aS a) "es D c Cr rim a) > wiej •.. co 03 t m as iti c 6 U ); a oa r�."' (1) U . „woo o N ,_C Mirk 0 -'v m coo d 44.1i CI) 0 ram Al Co) lirlt U > U inumr4 44 Ili yi4 w ftw,, k4„ rt 1-- i raak-1 December 7, 2011 Pelican bay services Division Board Regular Session ------- - ba. Cnairman s Report-darn nay upoate (Presented by Marcia Cravens) bB1f MEMORANDUM Date: August 7, 1998 To: Barbara Smith, Senior Secretary Pelican Bay Services Division From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 98-289, Accepting Terms and Conditions of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and Department of Environmental Protection re Ongoing Management of the Clam Bay System • Enclosed please find a copy of the document as referenced above, Agenda Item 4161318, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on August 4, 1998 . Kindly forward the instruments as indicated in the resolution to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please contact me at : 774-8406 . Thank you. Enclosure 1681 g RESOLUTION NO.98- 289 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE Tf K..IS AN1, (ONOrrioss OF THE VS ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS %E(.TIO. 40.1 PERMIT NO. 199602789fP-CC► AND TIIE FI.OKIIM l)E t'AItTMIE ENT OF F:.NVIRONMEN rAl. PKOTEC7 ION CONSOLIDATED JOINT COASTAL.PERMIT. SOVEREIGN SI'II'IEK(;E I)�LANDS A1m1OK17SATK)N AND. VARIANCE NO. 012114634101.JC• A (OMIPKEIIE NSI►'E Nl:►N.tGI:MIENT PLAN FOR TflE RESTORATION AND oscOIsc; MANAGEMENT OF THE CLAM HAY SYSTEM A\I) TO A('TIIOKIZE TDE DIRECTOR OF PELICAN HAY SERVICES TO SIGN TIIE PEItMIITh ON IIEIIAI.F OF COLLIER COl'NTY OE IT RESOLVED. the Board of t'o nny Commissional:or tallier tounh. Honda.on August 4. 1'$)X.has upon minion nlatk.seconded and passel determined to approve and accept the Ice me and conditions of the Gdhtaing Permits and I�asen nts and to ratify and aflintt the our, of the t'tn sent i We i1)1:1'File No,nl:%4ctt•4KJl-in Jai d the(i tl.td of.104. I'MM&to-tdit: I. I'S.:►COI:Swim-104 Ma. J9%0278911P-C'l'1. :. :f :p consolidated Joint c'asstal Permit.Sovereign Submerged Lands Authorization and Variance Ni,.012114(ri-b01 1('. HE IT FL RTIIF::It KFtigi.►'EI).that the instruments referenced abbe are to he attached and made a pan of this Resolution and that the Dircotn or the Pelican Had Sen ire.:Division is herein authorized and directed to seek such further attllnri/ati 1 as n1a■ he required to elii�rtuate the purposes and intent of she ahnse Permits anti lit sermon. anti ti implement:Ilki abide by the echo anti enitlititnls pl'lle(*flown((ink�r. This Resolution nil!become Amite immediately upon its puss e. 1 his Resolution adopted this day of August. I'$?X. tiler notion.second • and majority date. .:"..L._..... 1):1•11:1): • ,'%. . AIlI,•Si: IYtVI(ilfl I:.IlltiNI:.C'I.IERK HUJAKI)( l (Y)1:NIV('t)M\IIS%IONI KS Ctt1.1.11:K C(N'N•I V.1 LOK11)A L.i'.'..1'_ ▪ C /..rte% ' II Y: � •�1/4k it: fAKA 11. IER A1ttt:st ;: r•t .:1d1 CIIAIKMIAX f 19Mturt ;#.11 j. rNA'f :►pprnn cif a;hi limn and legal sulliete,ie: ./.414.44 .44.4y. Oat atl'. We s`' 8 • ('punt} Attorney I ORDINANCE NO. 96- 16 i'.•• c AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO VESSEL CONTROL AND WATEF •=• �, ! • • SAFETY IN TIFE CLAM BAY SYSTEM; PROVIDING FOR INTENT ' '.. 2t .,ND PURPOSE; PROVIDING TITLE AND CITATION; SETTING Z N _ 11�19� e 'Tll APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR VESSEL SPEED r� -o '�� 6 Re -111,ATION; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING ,. '-7 PET,fALTIES; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING `c•" t� •- r- �� FOIE ONFI,ICT AND SEVERAE3ILITY; AND PROVIDING ' r 'O ANA 1:FECTIVF. DATE. i '" e r• • WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 327.60, Florida Statutes, has the legal authority to adopt this Ordinance to impose idle speed zones on waterways in the unincorporated areas of the County;and WHEREAS, the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan, adopted by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on May 23, 1995, has identified the Clam Bay System as an idle speed zone;and , WHEREAS, it is necessary that the speed and operation of vessels located in the Clam , Bay System as specified herein be controlled in order to protect manatees and their habitat;and WHEREAS, the Clam Bay System has been designated as a Natural Resource Protection , Area in Collier County;and WHEREAS, it is in the interest for the safety and welfare of the canoeing public, • kayakers,and small boat operators,that certain controls and regulations be enacted to reduce risk and injury to the canoeing public,kayakers,and small boat operators and ensure the enjoyablity of these natural resources by the general public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY - COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: INTENT AND PURPOSE • • It is the intent and purpose of this Ordinance to protect and promote the health, safety and welfare of the public, including residents and visitors to Collier County and in particular to the • Clam Bay area by providing reasonable regulation to the operation of vessels as defined. It is further intended that this ordnance shall be liberally construed to effect such intent and purpose. ' I SECTION TWO: TITLE AND CITATION This Ordinance shall be known and be cited as the "Clam Bay System Water Safety and Vessel Control Ordinance." • SECTION THREE: APPLICABILITY . • This Ordinance shall apply to and be enforced on all the waters of the following described . Restricted Areas: I. The Clam Bay System including Upper Clam Bay, Inner Clam Bay, Outer Clam Bay, and Clam Pass. The restricted areas are as specified on the map attached hereto as"Exhibit A." • 2. Reserved. . ' t fttrtl�! MEM SECTION FOUR: VESSEL SPEED REGULATION Except during an emergency or operation by an official of the government while engaged in official business,the operation of any vessel in excess of idle speed, as defined herein, in or on any waters of the Clam Bay System is hereby prohibited and is a violation of this Ordinance. Said prohibition is effective and enforceable provided the "no wake" area is designated by regulatory marker,signage,buoy,or any other notice of the"no wake" status. The locations of such notices shall be placed at the discretion of the County Staff. All such notices posted by the County are official notices of the County. It is no defense to a violation of this Ordinance to allege that the Defendant did not observe notice of the"no wake"status attic waters of the Clam Bay System. SECTION FIVE: DEF'INITION.S • For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following words are defined as follows: A. IDLE SPEED means the minimum speed through or over the surface of the water 4 that will allow the vessel operator to maintain steerage of the vessel. B. OPERATE means to be in control of the speed of a vessel traveling over or in water. C. VESSEL means a motor propelled and/or artificially propelled boat, sailboat, barge, airboat or other watercraft used or capable of being used as a means of transportation of one (I) or more persons over or in the water, whether propelled by wind, propeller, or forcing • • flow of water by propeller or impeller, or otherwise. Vessel does not include a canoe, kayak, or similar small minimum wake type vessels provided the vessel is then being propelled only by paddle and not by motor,pump,or sail. "Vessel"does not include seaplane. ', 1 SECTION SIX: PENALTIES • 1 Each violation of this Ordinance is a civil infraction. If a Citation of Violation is not contested and is paid in full and on time, the fine shall be Fifty dollars (550.00) for the first • I violation within any six (6) month period, and one hundred dollars (5100.00) for a second violation by the same person within any one(I)year period. if the fine is not paid in full and on time, the Court may impose a fine of up to five hundred dollars (5500.00) plus court costs and • .1 any other costs and/or fees authorized to be imposed by the Court by Florida Statutes. As an 1 alternative means of enforcement, violations of this Ordinance may be referred to the Collier County Code Enforcement Board. • SECTION SEVEN: ENFORCEMENT • The provisions of this Ordinance shall be enforced by any member of any duly authorized 1 law enforcement agency or officers having enforcement jurisdiction in Collier County, Florida. Civil Citations may be used to notify the defendant of allegations of violations of this Ordinance. SECTION EIGHT: CONFLICT AND SEVERAIJILITY • In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the • remaining portion. a>aw�iM SECTION NINE: INCLUSION IN TILE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word"ordinance" may be changed to"section,""article, " or any other appropriate word. SECTION TEN: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Secretary of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier - County, Florida, this 9 '1 _day of' 1996. • • ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DW[GHT'E•.BROCK,Clerk OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • P� L/_�_y By: ••r C.NORRIS - • ' hairman Approved as to form and This ordinance flied with the Secretory of Slate's Office the legal sufficiency: at troy of c.4x , ,[�- and ackr+,v'°. ^m-n�t¢o`ff thct • \� oif iy .nc::'h . clay Thomas C. Palmer - tti•,ur. Assistant County Attorney • I TCPlmrb r ordinancerlwatenarety-cb 11 i ' • I � • • •• STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 96-16 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 9th day of April, 1996, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 10th day of April, 1996. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk''• •••''' •. Ex-officio to Board of. • County Commissioners, . , . • • • • By: /s/Maureen Koly n • Deputy Clerk' ` J�f lam' f T • 1'1 r --1,, .- EXECUTIVE III)OLARY 'e. I MOM=MT D TEX BOARD 07 COU'x?i CONNISSIONERS APPROVE TEl ORDINANCE • TOOTING TEN CLAX EAT SYSTEK AS AN IDLE SPEED SORE. • t • 4� That the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve the Ordinance posting the Clam Bay System as an Idle Speed Zone. T , . e; r 1. The Clam Bay Task Force has asked staff about the possibility of restricting the excessive speed of personal watercraft 1•4 •. traveling in the Clam Bay System. t 2. The Collier County Manatee Protection Plan approved by the ,, BCC on May 23, 1995, and accepted by the State on July 25, e 1995, identifies the Clam Bay System as an Idle Speed Zone. ;;;,1 3. On February 20, 1996 the BCC directed the Natural Resources ' ;• 4 �' Department to write an Ordinance posting the Clam Bay System as an Idle Speed zone (Agenda item 8A(2) , and to fund the -1 k posting of signs from the General Fund. 'i • QRORTI 1W AOEMLlIT IMPACT t ",S x An Ordinance posting the Clam Bay System supports Policies 7.2.1 L>, and 7.2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of = � X.. the County Growth Management Plan. `° Adoption of the Ordinance will require the County to post signs. Costs of permitting and installation is estimated at $1500, to come from the General Fund Reserves. •�+ . .: y. • f .-APR O-8. . - • .„, . • • - . -...- ' '-' . t.. • Y•'......' .4.'4 1, 4 at.7-,.:...: t . iki'T',.. .• • • . 0.0', • • - '•' ".' a ‘ rro. e" ...4 ‘ laggeana21011 -; I ......) ,A, A That the BCC approve the Ordinance posting the Clan Bay System Is . , 4; S Idle Speed and authorising the appropriate budget amendment to , ...•; fund the posting of this area. ....A. • ,-. .. . ./ -. Lc , k -: , ,.... ,•'•.' .. Prepared byt4:1-17r4cof Date: 446: - -. ,":. ; '„'..'•;: Nevin H. pin, Sr. environmental Specialist • , - - • , ..; ,•,,,,i. - ' - ; • • * , . „, . Reviewed by: J4 & 1.41 .11, Dates iam D. 2, Jr 11.E., Director -• . • .......,. ; - r - • .• .. t..;!...,0• Na ur 1 Res:::]:ipz;:;;:sent . '• ' . • .„ 4-. Q ? ? Date: 24Q412..d11' ■/. . .-•••12 . "< Approved by: Date: 4d -•,_. co• .'i.....,. *. ncent A. tero, Administrator ,,, --• . •,„4-- ommunity Development & Environmental Services --.: ., .,,,,, --;- ,.- , • -'• 4- • . ,e' ', e^ .... 4 . ....,... ,.. 7 7; 5 ,i 4 . VC '••• t.... ..,... '4! • •• V. ::1 !. . ..1f, Aq. .4 ',... i ‘.. 4,`7 ' . . I,'l r,_ . ..1.f,-:•.. • t S?, :Mak:::t..• e.0'..,' ,■ ' N. .... ..-..„ vp.....0 APR 0: ,.., ',",`,:‘: ;41 ',;: • k .■;'. , ',r . rr,t(-A ):14: • i'..: - LI i ry ,,E;•-,,kw.■-;,‘,--„4 a .... .., ■ .7r""r."•••• '''''.7. ... , ' ,, .e....-• . • '....-... ..■ • • " " } f fie -- 2� t MEMORANDUM y; TO: Pamela S. Mac'Kie Commissioner,District 4 FROM: David C. Weigel D.-2-AR r11v.i County Attorney DATE: May 24, 1996 RE: Pelican Bay Conservation Area Maintenance/Mangrove Issues This past Wednesday evening I was listening to the WNOG radio station Amy Chartrand/ Commissioner Mac'Kie interview rebroadcast, wherein, in response to a question concerning funding sources and responsibilities for the damaged mangrove area in Pelican Bay, you responded something to the effect, that, if County Attorney David Weigel were listening, perhaps I would provide you some legal assistance in that regard. Having received my "calling," I am pleased to provide you with a recent memorandum concerning this very issue that I had provided to Commissioner Hancock this past Friday. Although specific questions and responses are provided in the referenced May 17, 1996 memorandum, I have taken the liberty to describe in this memorandum a little bit of history pertaining to the Pelican Bay Improvement District and its successor in interest,the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit. The Pelican Bay Improvement District came into being in 1974 by virtue of a special act: Laws of Fla., Chapter 74-462, which created the Pelican Bay Improvement District and provided for its governing board (qualified electors residing within the district), extensive powers, and a means of"succession,"whereupon the County Commission of Collier County in its sole discretion could (and did) succeed to the powers, rights, duties, fimctions and obligations of the district. The Board of County Commissioners succeeded to the principle functions of the Pelican Bay Improvement District pursuant to Chapter 74-462, Laws of Fla., on June 19, 1990. In parallel fashion,the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 90-111 in 1990, creating the Pelican Bay Municipal.Service Taxing and Benefit Unit that is comprised of and includes those lands "being one and the same as the lands encompassed by_the Pelican Bay Improvement District" (Ord. 90-111, §2, as amended.) As stated in my May 17, 1996 memorandum to Commissioner Hancock, the creation, purpose and powers of the Pelican Bay MSTBU are for and include the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas within the MSTBU. (See attached 5/17/96 memo for details.) Thereupon, it would appear that a municipal service taxing unit (actually, a municipal service taxing and benefit unit), has existed since 1990 with the capability of taxation within the district for the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas within the unit. I hope the foregoing information is of assistance to you and responsive to your query. If you should have any further questions in this regard, please contact me at your convenience. Attachment DCW/mrb h knisclpelicanbay-mac'itie uecember 7, 2uii reiican bay services Division Board Regular Session ea. i:nairman s Report-Gam bay upaate • 11111 (Presented by Marcia Cravens) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive•Suite 605•Maples,Florida 34108 • (239)597-1749 •Fax (239)597-4502 May 6,2009 Mr. Donald W. Kinard Deputy Chief,Regulatory Division Enforcement Section 199602789 (JP-CC) Jacksonville District Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019 Dear Mr. Kinard: On May 6, 2009 at a duly noticed meeting the Pelican Bay Services Division(PBSD),the permittee on the Department of the Army permit number 199602789 issued on August 11, 1998, voted to request a modification and clarification of the permit and authorized this letter. Specifically the language in the following paragraph of the management plan included by reference is misleading, especially if one interprets"marked" as referring to lateral navigation signs. Lateral navigation signs denote safe passage which does not exist: "Finally, the main channel will be marked in accordance with the requirements imposed by the United States Coast Guard to ensure that those who use the system clearly know where the channel is and the prohibitions against operating their water craft outside the same." The management plan should be clarified to read as follows: "Finally the waters of Clam Pass and Outer Clam Bay shall be marked with non-lateral navigation signs to clearly mark areas of concern for boaters and the prohibitions against operating their water craft outside the same." This would be in full compliance with Collier County Ordinance 96-16 that guarantees the navigation rights to all and also provides enforcement of the non-lateral sign restrictions. Review'of all the minutes taken during the preparation of the permit agrees that this is the intent of the correct language and the contents of the following paragraphs in the permit also confirm this intent: "For the most part,the accumulation of sediments and the shoaling that has taken place • C o ! f s e r c o .„ N C y a has resulted in physically limiting accessibility of Clam Bay to deeper draft boats and particularly those equipped with engines." "The Management Plan would not anticipate any changes in the recreational use characteristics of Clam Bay." "Appropriate notification, signage and policing will be provided by the County or PBSD to ensure compliance. The signage will be strategically placed both at the entrance to Clam Pass and in the areas around the boat ramp located at the southern end of Outer Clam Bay." Furthermore there is no main channel and the USCG has not imposed any requirements on the PBSD to install these signs. I want to add that NOAA Nautical Chart 11430 has Clam Pass marked as"non-navigable"and the Coast Pilot describes, "Clam Pass, about 5 miles N of Naples, is a shoal drainage canal to Outer Clam Bay. The pass is used only by outboards in good weather." The section on inside navigation states,"Navigation on the waterways covered by this volume requires a knowledge of the channel conditions and other factors restricting navigation." A shoal, by definition, is a hs7ard to navigation. We are in the process of refurbishing the canoe trail markers in need of repair and are adding three markers to mark the trail to the pass. I am including the plan showing the location of the canoe trail markers and the non-lateral navigation signs. Sincerely, Theodore J.Raia, Jr. Director Pelican Bay Services Division Encl: Canoe trail plan NOAA Nautical Chart 11430 Coast Pilot, Pages 207,237 CC Ms. Susan Blass, Section Chief Mr. Tunis McElwain, Regulation Enforcement Pelican Bay Foundation Pelican Bay Services Division d. � --4,-,..-e,• rk f'" ar•r � -2'.:3, R y . ' ,# : ,g s '"-fi a . .i @-1,.;:.,j' t-, A '- '= F� fir.r. -�n5.r �a €: b,..f. ., a g3 _' COMBO TRAIL MARI�R 8 ° y� SIGN fi INTO O SIGN $ } CAUTION IDLE SPEED " . .%,1,.,:. • t•.,. . ':-,...,t%. . 1ALLOW WA1ERA� r �TM ' 1r 3 <. gORAS$E8 PRESENT •"`.as p LOCALI ON# E .« r' ,� - r REQUIRED � ea TRAR MAfdCER r .w 1j .11>ts,.., CWy iAYCAN0.k'Rkl � .3• ; �' R- CiNE � .�, fi � TAPF �y�� fA a <,,,,,,,,,,,i,",:20::, ,.: ..,.., ‘... ,, ° , . . .r..s.., i_."_i,, TYPICAL TRAIL MARi4 RR ,,.1 I TRAL MARfCER iiA'1 StY C8110Q tbtp. - � fy +yam TAPE _' _ q ) + v I ° 1 �9 F � 3 @ . t .wax{*: . . '9`f- I-' "° _ t .•.n'# c># 'e ..; a: xa :. , z r ti FC.r2IA^talY ny Y' z . -t "•�, ✓ 4' .. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND �; ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION . U ,,ITz c. i.Ir..Tt. S 0 C P.A,T PE`27 .ti_ _ :JAC R.J C NOM s„Qn-Line Chart Viewer The nautical chart is a fundamental tool of marine navigation. It shows water depths, obstructions,aids to navigation, channels,shoreline,and more—hopefully all the information mariners need to navigate safely. . OAA's 1,000-plus U.S.coastal and Great Lakes nautical charts are viewable here on-line. Each chart is up-to-date with the most recent Notices to Mariners. Use these on-line charts as a ready reference or planning tool. Use one of NOAA's iriatal or cii€itai charts on your voyage. r w- a Chou*11-ti0.Edition:26,Edition Date:11t1K®@. .., Dente:2/4/2008 kh,t_z_____ . . 1m,,, _ _. _._ ti_ pew • 1 ._._ : . . _ . _. ... . a `moo ..--^rte I t,�Fy IA �� Venetferl _. {,' -r Mangrove _ Outer � ,-- _ _ - r 16 18 14 12 16 13 ---'1 is 18 17 41111b 18 19 +19 19 18 • , UNITED STATES • A • ® i DO H tx 1 r rm � Atlantic Coast: „� Gulf of Mexico,Puerto Rico,a c irgin Islands 2008 (36th) Edition This edition has been corrected through:7th Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners No 14/08,and the 8th Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners No. 14108. Changes 1 through 38 to the previous edition(35th Edition,2007)have been entered into this edition. Changes to this edition will be published in the Seventh Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners,the Eighth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners,and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency(NGA)Notice to Mariners,The changes are also on the Internet at http-Jhnauticalcharts.noaa.gov/nsdkpdowrilo�htm. ( U S.Department of Commerce Carlos M.Gutierrez,Secretary y,E_ National OePanic and Atmospheric Adminsstralion (NOAA) Vice Admiral Conrad C.Lautenbacher,Jr,USN(Ret),Under Secretary of Commerce fr r for Oceans and Atmosphere.and Administrator,NOAH WV/ National Ocean Service • . John H.13unnigan,Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone[Management Washington,DC For sale by the National Ocean Service and Its sales agents Gulf of Mexico 0 Chapter3 207 • be expected for 200 miles after leaving Dry Tortugas. overtaken vessel may suddenly sheer from current ac- For the next 100 miles the current generally sets Eat tion.This is even more pronounced with larger vessels OS knot.For the next 200 miles the set is about NNE at and tows. 0.2 knot. For nearly 200 miles before reaching Galveston the set is approximately WNW at 0.2 knot.It Crossaerrerrts is emphasized that this approximates the long-term um Where two streams cross,the current will have a mean current pattern and that it may not be expert- greater velocity in the deeper channel.This is notice- enced on any particular voyage.(See Loop Current,this able along the Intracoastal Waterway where it follows a chapter.)Winds and storms frequently modify condi- dredged canal cutting across a winding stream.Cross- • tions,and their effects must he taken into account currents will also be noticedwhere either an inlet from the ocean or a drainage canal or a river enter the water- InAgg Navigation way. on) l Navigation on the waterways covered by this vol- (1321 Crosscurrents are especially strong along the time requires a knowledge of the channel conditions Intracoastal Waterway in San Carlos Bay, The and other factors restricting navlgatio� eral items itigolets-Flew Orleans Cut,Chef Menteur Pass,Vermil of interest to the vessel operator are indicated in the ion River Cutoff,and Brazos and Colorado Rivers. paragraphs that follow;details are given in the text. cum Special regulations governing the use,administra- Spoil banks tion, and navigation of floodgates and locks of the osm Nature quickly covers her scars.This is true of the Intracoastal Waterway are given in 207.185 and spoil banks made by dredging. When•awash, these 207.187,chapter 2. banks are often covered by grass,bushes,and some- . times fairly large trees: Manmade canals osii Water hyacinth is a floating freshwater plant which n 31 In addition to the numerous bayous and natural ca- infests numerous streams tributary to the South Atlan- nals,thousands of manmade canals have been dredged tic and Gulf Coasts. It has bright green leaves and a in the wetlands along the Gulf coast.While the original purple flower. It propagates from seeds and suckers, purpose of many of these canals was for private Arepss spreads quickly in most localities,and may cause can- to pipelines,well locations, or for other mineral-re- plete suspension of navigation if not removed.The hya- lated activities,some are used by boaters.These canals cinths form in mats or Jams and float around driven by and bayous contain numerous obstructions including • the wind or current In open water these mats often re- barriers,pipes,pilings,and construction debris.Some semble small islands.At times some of the bays and of these structures are permanently maintained and tributaries may be changed in appearance due to hya- have been suitably marked or lighted by their owners. cinth jams.Where the water is apt to be brackish,an at- Many others appear and disappear without notice and tempt can be made to force a boat through the mat.In are uncharted,unlighted,and unmarked.Even on the doing so,however,care should be taken that any logs marked structures,mariners cannot rely on the mark- that might be floating in the weeds are not struck with ings always being maintained in good condition be- force enough to damage the hull.Snakes may also be cause of vandalism or weather damage.Therefore,all found on the hyacinth mats.The work of removing this persons using canals and bayous must anticipate the growth is undertaken by the various Corps of Engi- hazards posed by these obstructions and navigate with nets districts and the State of Florida by the processes extreme caution,especially at night and during periods of spraying,cutting,and the use of booms of reduced visibility. Maugre: or Csi ry s ossn hree distinct types of mangrove are found in the S racoastal and adjoining waterways there section of this area.Yellow or white mangrove is found • are many sharp bends which are dangerous to vessels principally on the sand flats in front of the fast land. meeting or passing. On approaching a bend, a vessel Red mangrove is rooted in water most of the Lime. should reduce speed sufficiently to be able to stop Black mangrove grows on sand ridges and higher within half the distance to a ship coming from the op- ground which cover only at very high water or storm posite direction.Under no circumstances should a yes- tides.The black mangrove sometimes grows to a height - sel attempt to overtake and pass another at a bend. of 50 to 60 feet. Along the coast from Cape Sable to Even with sufficient view of the channel ahead and af- Everglades City,most mangroves grow from 25 to 50 ter proper exchange and understanding of signals,the feet high with some stands of red mangroves reaching Key West to Tampa Bay • Chapter 4 W 237 Large apartment buildings on either side of the en- overhead power cable with a clearance of 36 feet trance are prominent. crosses the entrance to the lagoon justW of the bridge. ads In April 1982,the reported depth was 4 feet in New Pass and in the channel leading S to the marinas and fish camps near Big Hickory Pass, Stakes mark the am Clam Pass,about 5 miles N of Naples,is a shoal channel.In February 1978,a row of pilings,centered in drainage canal to Outer Clam Bay. The pass is used 26°22'42"N.,81°51'53"W.,was reported to obstruct the only by outboards in good weather.A fixed pedestrian channel through New Pass. bridge with a clearance of 7 feet vertically,and 12 feet war Big Carlos Pass,marked by lighted and unlighted horizontally crosses Outer Clam Bay. (See 117.1 buoys,is about IS miles NW of New Pass.A bridge with through 117-59 and 117.323, chapter 2, for draw- a 50-foot bascule span crossing Big Carlos Pass from bridge regulations.) Carlos Point to Black Island has a clearance of 23 feet at the center.(See 117.1 through 117.59 and 117.267, chapter 2,for drawbridge regulations.) ws) High-rise buildings on the S end of Estero Island are prominent when approaching Big Carlos Pass from asap Wiggins Pass,4 miles N of Clam Pass,is subject to the Gulf.Other high-rise and/or lower condominiums frequent changes.The pass is used by small craft enter- dot the Gulf side of Estero Island at its N end. ing Cocohatchee River and the chain of lagoons arid in- an About 1 mile NW of the bridge,a 2,100-foot pri- land waterways that lead N to the passes in Estero Bay. vately dredged cut, 150 feet wide with several canals A private light marks the approach to the pass.Inside branching off from it,leads to a basin 500 feet long and the pass, a channel, marked by private daybeacons, 200 feet wide. A marina in the basin has gasoline, leads S to Water Turkey Bays.There are several marinas electricity, water, ice, marine supplies, wet and dry on the N side of the Cocohatchee River near the Mouth storage,and a pump-out station Engine repairs can be that provide gasoline,diesel fuel,water,ice,dry stor- made. In March 2007,6 feet was reported in the ap- age,and marine supplies.Hull,engine and electronic proach to the marina repairs can be made;lift to 5 tons. assn A highway leads along the coastal beach from Bonita Beach on Little Hickory Wand and crosses Big Hickory Pass on a bridge with a 40-foot fixed span with ans Saner��41 miles NNW from Cape R a clearance of 10 feet. pe omano, is a ms A microwave tower,about 7 miles inshore between largely 6 tied with shoals on which the depthsvary be- Wiggins Pass and Big Hickory Pass,is reported to be been 1 and 6 feet,and is of importance chiefly as the prominent The tower,715 feet high,is marked at the approach to Caloosahatchee River,the Okeechobee Wa- t op by a red aircraft lighL A lighted green water tower terway, and the Intracoastal Waterway, Gulf Section. on Big Hickory Island and a hotel between Wiggins The bay and adjacent waters are frequented mostly by Pass and Clam Pass are also reported to be prominent small vessels and yachts,and are popular with tourists during m'> In April 1992,Big Hickory Pass was reported open and fishermen the winter. for small craftwith local knowledge.Private daybeacons Russ Sanibel Island Light (26°271111%, 82°001511/4.), reportedly mark the channel from the pass S through 98 feet above the water,is shown from a brown square Hogue Channel,Big Hickory Bay,and Fish Trap Bay to pyramidal skeleton tower,enclosing a stair cylinder on Imperial River and also N through Broadway Channel Point the E end of Sanibel Island. to New Pass and Big Carlos Pass.Local knowledge is ad- ri29s San Cannon Bay L SC(26°25'o8"N.,81°57'33'W.), vised.A marina on the E side of the bridge over Big 16 feet above the water,shown from a dolphin,is 3.6 Hickory Pass has berths with electricity,gasoline,we.- miles SE of Sanibel Island Light and marks the en- ter,and ice. trance to San Carlos Bay. au The highway continues N from Big Hickory Pass D over causeways Demarcation on the islets in the S end of Estero Bay n Lines with bridges over New Pass,the pass just N of Big Rick. ant The lInes established for San Carlos Bay are de- my Island,and Big Carlos Pass.The bridge over New scribed in 80.748,chapter 2. Pass has a clearance of 30 feet,and the one over the en- trance to the lagoon on the E side of Black Island has a Channels 30-foot fixed span with a clearance of 10 feet. An °3n Matanzas(Estero)Pass opens into the SE end of San Carlos Bay,2.5 miles from Sanibel Island Light.