CLB Backup 01/15/2014 CONTRACTORS
LICENSING
BOARD
Backup
January 15 , 2014
I( 151 , 4_
Cu
v L I---D
• { s
, , , • • ,♦ ♦ .
. . . ♦ . a* ,
• • . . .
,,,, ‘ ."1
cA ____.ii.,-
i \
i 111 I _
. - ♦ of t
e
y
=, , _ ` _
_ �y e r
d iv
••
I.: v
~
�, g * •;.,4, ~.i a'
,__ _
. ii f■ p t Tilt:
._ ,,
. . ,... ii. 4 1 4 •
- Y-aL'.. .' � _ " +—tea= _
•• yt 1'fir '~. - -y_r.- `
_
`,
r
C
it1-D
•
•
• }4•
.
3' + •
•
w
e
•0 _
t Sl 22oI
C,VI� VII- 1t
•
.\\„ .
•.� , .
p
.�.
M
f.•
Si
,*.ilt\
\\
. , , st (Lot+
, , ,
c \` l !-D
lit
AI
I
_ — r
r _ -.,
i ! - r .. A.,.,:,.. - _
,, , ,
=,,,r...-__ _ � _
..,..._ . ..
-. �- „c
-,%
. ,,,,,,-;iiiiiiii .•
//
7 .
al,
•
II ilk --....„....._
I
I
thslu
•
'W7 \J<<- D
i 1 5 'Logi-,
1t-a. Ni i 1-D
,,,-.,,_ ------------7 - ,
r
.
I
.,.:•:.,f. ., •
g;ii 1."1 11
.„... ,
.......•• _. , •
ri
____ .... ...
..... ...
....
...4_
..... , IN
' I
k 4
, , 6
—1 ,
=
•
t , imisimmimq-:•
ii.
/. . .
.-
lie .
.., ,
' ."4 ''' YPI ' •
•
.....
.. •• .
._•.•., . ...
,
... 1- •• • 0 ■III ss"■...,,,,,....__■_,... ....,.,,.... ijS
grng'
le
..- _ ,. ----- .............,....................---1,....,--'\,...........„.\.„
rr
mon"
'."
I ...r.,
--:
1
--...
r.
I ''..: ,. ,,, :711.. ';,,,t-, •- ,`i t..:., ,-.'
'. P ------,.. '-'----------
---- 00:000000000.0„..-
-/-- - ___
alliA :
,
II
AV
1
_.. i _„-,
I Its Wilk'
Cu b VII-1),
7 .....
111611
t ) li1 A, \ W
li a1 �'
_�� . t -_.: _.-ti
... - - rr4P',Ir__
"� .1
_-, or a ' ' r--
11
l'11'-
.11116
_± �.. — i
.�i ,i ' g .
tij
I r
•
..._
1T
Y r.; ' `
• a, ! + , rr
1 1 I 6 \21)(4
Cub \il4
x41 -
. .--. 'Iri
il
t
‘..1_,,,,...._ ,,7
I _ __ _
, �
j
_____,,moi .
ss_.. M - - - -_
l
. 0
s NM
JJ
• p
•• IP mil=
MN
s
el
i
4>
WI
dig ___
. , _____
,,
... . .
r.._.c,.....----" now r' '' -- 111 r. i .......
10,,,..,
. ;•
11 _ e a a'
r _ 404,1
.0.. _ „ a
. ,
Itit.H0011
4
•71 . ,' ,iv.,
Ill
1 �[ ti..",
y 1
.►
Pn��, . +�, 4-
vim'
oral
ir 44
' ` 7'
r mbj
# t'r
SIM I'
Fr
Ili
i milk fir`
.� .
Giu
w al
sag
�� ,*„,,,0,,.,.
T r, ;r mt,
+
E
•
....ii. • °,,,/ �' ref i°.
r s it, Y s°
" /„ t f
Y_ si
g -
V
/j
` T^
V
1c
Uri, Azg '
� iii ,�..
I
• \ /
•
•
,
€ ,_.4,1 ,'
s M1
�..
y
1
t
i
s'
: ri .
r. .
. : .
11, tv_wiiiii...........,„
1
Od ti L`
'
00 110111-701,-
rx+... . X
_ iii
I `1JI
_
T
As;4`i (
LF`J �t }, 4 .i ' r‘..---'s s � -
t F i,,1 } - Ft' I
1
a a .. x '�� x s 'ak I
j!!IIi!iihjIiI' iL
€ T ���: t����► ISIE�;i�C r#�8iik�7tld ° Fm$ �_ �E c
f .y, c�t�gg
';
, ",i '..i' I "4'1 L 1 ,I i r ' LI Ara 1r,_,,,,,„4317'rja
, , 3 .41 . ,41, .'-14-,4d,'' ' 'A #11 '''iliri".ri-11-1
.tRE° Gt a }k ;,
�1 t-
Y
r - L tF i °dap . j i j
t'
fir, #" �# 8 �
- �. Mfr , t i -
=awe/—'-g �� ; aa�'
F r,r " fi4 S Y c'■ '�.,a KT / c i a.. f .et e ' ' 'Ur ,� \ ' irH.-11041„,,,,..,4,11.-.4---i— - '„1 .;,:i' ,,ittlifl' Wm„,1 2 :
jot , ti f , ,,... „ r �c
1 "
S qI , .� ��_.,,,,j
' i tf/04==...--„-
ibiLltr. rr , 1;q ,,10 f, 1 1, ,..1
II
�r ..
irt
,, I A
W <-=.
UN
G
I
3 :,
ed
• z f
1
Se
�y:,11 M
11i
•
v
r s//,,/
/717-fr''
i ,/,' iiiii pi
f ',. , ii. .
ii /...
..... . .,
..........,, . _. „ / ,
- 1 A
r ,
t_
0
C G
c
x
,r
i
vz
a. ,
ate" .,..,ate
t -
_ Y
T_.
C
\ i
(.■
C Si
f.
d
4'
ill 1.-"Ii-? . '' ---, _
, ..„:‘,...
,_
io , ,..„,,........„... . .
II ..- _ ....„,.. ,4„,,:„.,..,„.,.,.
..,,,gt_ •: .--- - . ...,..
ci
i
I
i
, ';.sue, d TM� d_
z
' j
i , ,,
; i
t
1 f'" r u
f +mil
11 ,, I
{� i:
r
g LA
,
i
1
i
t
iir I/
.. _,,,,........ ..7-",-- ' '-'' ''' Al
�
Fa
.�
R�
Ilp
.
}
is c
�' i • ? � k>
Y 1� x °
f . ' .
t
IiI 4
i. 4 -
f ,
h
f : 1Ix.. c Ott 'r
�r `e
t,
,����
V
%ltt\ of
vo-s)
Mike Ugrica
725 Donmills Rd,suite 1701 Toronto, ON M3C 1S7
Residence 416-829-5011 Email-mugricaPlive.ca
Construction Project Management
-Specializing in Residential and Light Commercial-
PROFILE
Results-orientated hands- on construction and development professional with 15 years of
expertise in all facets of the industry.Verifiable track record for the successful completion of
projects through coordinating trades, developing partnerships,and building positive rapport with
architects, designers, local officials,vendors,and clients while maintaining costs.Versed in contract
negotiations,project estimating, impending design problems, document preparation,building code
and regulations,material purchasing, site management through certification of occupancy.
Areas of experience lie in:
Team building and Leadership - Permitting and building code- Construction Planning&
Scheduling- Project Management- Budget Analysis- Quality Control Management-Safety&
Compliance Management-Organization &Time Management-Vendor&Materials Management-
Estimating
Employment History
2002 - Present
Mike Ugrica, Sole Proprietor- Project Manager/General Contractor
Plan, organize and manage overall residential construction development for my own
company. Responsibilities' include design and blueprint review and analysis of projects,
preparation of construction documents, bidding, negotiations, sub-contractor selection,
material purchasing, scheduling, project budget, building code compliance, project
development and quality control.
Supervise crews of several trades workers.
1998-2002
Keldeer Construction Inc. -Site Supervisor
Job description and responsibilities: Sourcing and hiring sub trades. Framing, demolition,
transporting tools to and from jobsites. Ordering and picking up supplies. Dealt with clients
questions and provided answers.
hs tiq
C,L-b
Continued
1996-1998
Milmic Construction Inc. - Duty Manager
Job description and responsibilities: Framing, demolition, dry walling, tiling. Organizing
sub trades in owner's absence. Minor accounting.
1995-1996
Atcoast Drilling Company- General Labourer
Job description and responsibilities: Working with engineers to collect core samples.
Operated forklifts, bulldozers,tractors and bobcats. Driving drilling rig to work areas.
Report findings.
1990-1995
Leaside High Schools
Graduated and received Ontario Secondary School Diploma
•
lis (it(
ctevil-o
1569625 ONTARIO LIMITED
121 Robert Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2K5
January 3rd, 2014
To whom it may concern:
Mr. Mico Ugrica has been working as a General Contractor for 1569625 Ontario Limited since
June 2001. He has shown exceptional knowledge in Construction and rebuilding multi-unit
properties. Mico Ugrica has done small renovations to building large additions and restorations.
Some of the projects Mico Ugrica has done
333 Harbord Street, Toronto, ON M6G 1H3 (9000 SOFT, 10 Plex,8-3 bedrooms 1-lbedroom
1-bachelor) 2003-2012
Constructed 3 complete new 800 SQFT Units from foundation to roof, 152 2nd,3rd floor.
Complex foundation repair at front of building inclusive of underpinning, bench footing and
waterproofing.
Extensive restoration of the front of the building under strict building and Historical Preservation codes.
6 Bathroom, 3 Kitchen Gut and Reno
858 Davenport Road, Toronto, ON M6G 2B6 (7840 SQFT, 10 Plex,8-1 bedrooms 1-2 bedroom
1-bachelor 2008-2010
Replacement of all exterior windows and doors
7 Units Full Gut and Reno, Kitchens, Bathrooms, Flooring and drywall.
Common Area Heritage Restoration work, Banisters, Moldings,Tuck Pointing,Concrete Repair
Waterproofing Interior& Exterior
Landscaping and Reverse Ravine Retaining Walls
834 Davenport Road, Toronto, ON M6G 2B6 (2600 SOFT,Triplex 3-lbedroom) 2010-2011
3 Units Full Gut and Reno, Kitchens, Bathrooms, Flooring and Drywall
Waterproofing Interior& Exterior
Renovated common areas, Laundry room, Mechanical Room
Exterior esthetic improvements including new entrance way
llls� l�
C--t VILA)
We have attached some pictures for your reference. Please Note that all Permits were pulled by
our Architects and designers. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or concerns
regarding Mico Ugrica. He will be greatly missed in Toronto as a phenomenal General
Contractor to which is irreplaceable.
Sincerely,
Francesco Porretta
Secretary Treasurer
1569625 Ontario Limited
Direct Line: 416-434-1117
Direct Fax: 416-961-9995
Email: fporretta @trebnet.com
' kill--
:'sy
CUB VIVI)
r:
j
Western
December 21, 2013
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing a letter of reference and recommendation for Mike Ugrica, who has been
our trusted and highly skilled general contractor for many years. Mike has renovated
many of our properties — in fact, since he was referred to us about 10 years ago, we
would not use anyone else. Our only regret is that he has relocated to the U.S. and is no
longer available to us in Canada!
Most recently, Mike undertook an extensive series of renovations on a detached, 4 level
building we purchased at 133 Ulster St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In different phases,
and over an 18 month period from 2010-2012 (project phases which depended on our
timelines and funding), Mike renovated each floor of the building, include a complete
gut and rebuild of the fourth level, which was built as a luxury, penthouse unit. This
work required that he oversee all aspects of the construction and coordinate various
trades including: framing, drywalling, design and installation of the heating and cooling
systems, rewiring and installation of a new electrical panel, the construction of a dormer
at the front of the building, installation of marble and hardwood flooring, construction
of bathrooms, and kitchens and all associated plumbing, and all finishing touches,
including painting.
Mike worked with us effectively, and he skillfully executive and oversaw all aspects of
the construction and renovation. He discovered many previously unknown structural
issues with the building, and continuously consulted with us about best options for their
resolution. If anything, Mike tends to overbuild and err on the side of caution and extra
care — a trait which makes him a superb contractor and someone whose expertise we
entirely trust.
Mike has been reliable and flexible throughout the many renovations for which we have
hired him, and he has always accommodated all of our frequently changing ideas and
design inspirations. Finally, Mike is also exceptionally polite and very personable,
making him a pleasure to work with. He is the consummate professional and we highly
recommend him.
vii -t
I hope that this information is of assistance and please do not hesitate to contact me if
you require any further information.
Yours truly,
V24'
Me . i•- R.nda , P .D., LL.B.
Associate Professor
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7
CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS )
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA )
)
Petitioner, )
) Case No: 2014-01
vs. ) License No. 19105 and 21273
)
Mario Rodriguez )
d/b/a K.C. Tiles and Marble, Inc., )
A mik
)
Respondent(s) )
)
ory
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came on for public hearing before the Contractors' Licensing Board
(hereafter Board) on January 15, 2014, for consideration of the Administrative
Complaint filed against Mario Rodriguez dba K.C. Tiles and Marble, Inc., the
"Respondent". Service of the Complaint was made in accordance with Section 22-202
of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The Board made a
finding of fact that the service conformed with the requirements of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The Board having at said hearing heard
testimony under oath, received evidence, and heard arguments respective to all
appropriate matters, thereupon issues its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order of the Board as follows:
Page 1 of 7
319668.2 1/30/2014
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That Mario Rodriguez is the holder of record of Collier County License Numbers
19105 and 21273, for tile and marble and masonry, respectively.
2. That the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is the
complainant in this matter.
3. That the Board has jurisdiction of the person of the Respondent and that Mario
Rodriguez was present at the public hearing and was not represented by counsel at the
hearing on January 15, 2014.
4. All notices required by the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County,
Florida, have been properly issued, hand delivered and delivered by certified mail in
accordance with Section 22-202 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County,
Florida.
5. The evidence presented and testimony given established that the Respondent
acted in a manner that is in violation of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier
County, Florida, as follows: (1) engaging in contracting to do work outside of his scope
of competency as listed on his competency card (Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, Section 22-201(2)), and (2) failed to provide worker's
compensation insurance (Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida,
Section 22-201(6)), and is the one who committed the acts.
6. That the Contractors' Licensing Supervisor and Staff presented sworn testimony,
and the administrative complaint and exhibits thereto were admitted into evidence. The
Page 2 of 7
319668.2 1/30/2014
Respondent was afforded an opportunity to present sworn testimony, exhibits, and to
cross examine the Contractors' Licensing Supervisor and witness. The Board was
afforded an opportunity to ask questions of the Respondent and witness. The Board
determined that the allegations of fact as set forth in the Administrative Complaint, as to
Count I, Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, Section 22-201(2)
and as to Count II, Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, Section 22-
201(6) are true and therefore such facts are hereby found to be supported by the
evidence presented at the hearing.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The Conclusions of Law alleged and set forth in the Administrative Complaint as
to Counts 1 and 2 were supported by the clear and convincing evidence presented at
the hearing on January 15, 2014, and said conclusions of law are hereby approved,
adopted, and incorporated herein, to wit, the Respondent violated Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, Sections 22-201(2) and 22-201(6) in the
performance of his contracting business in Collier County by acting in violation of the
sections set out above with particularity.
2. Collier County has jurisdiction over this contractor.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and
pursuant to the authority granted in Chapter 489, Florida Statutes, and the Code of
Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, by a vote of 9 in favor and 0 opposed,
Page 3 of 7
319668.2 1/30/2014
a unamimous vote of the Board members present, the Respondent has been found in
violation as set out above.
Further, it is hereby ORDERED, by a vote of 9 in favor and 0 opposed, a
unamimous vote of the Board members present, that the following disciplinary
sanction(s) and related order are hereby imposed upon the Respondent as holder of
Contractor's License Numbers 19105 and 21273:
1. Both licenses are hereby revoked.
2. Respondent is ordered to pay a fine in the amount of five thousand dollars
($5,000.00) per violation for an aggregate fine of$10,000.00.
3. Respondent is ordered to pay $2,000 in administrative and investigative costs to
the County within 30 days.
4. Respondent is to receive a public reprimand.
The Respondent, any other party, the chairman of the Contractors' Licensing
Board, the Contractors' Licensing Board as a body, or the assistant county attorney who
tried the case may request a rehearing of any decision of the Contractors' Licensing
Board. A request for rehearing shall be in writing and shall be filed with staff and a copy
thereof should be delivered to all other parties within twenty (20) days from the date of
mailing or other method of delivery to the Respondent(s) of the Board's written decision.
A request for rehearing must be based only on the ground that the decision was
contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law that was
Page 4 of 7
3196682 1/30/2014
fundamental to the decision of the Board. The written request for rehearing must specify
the precise reasons therefore. The decision of the Board that is the subject of the
rehearing request will remain in effect throughout the rehearing procedure unless the
Board orders otherwise.
The Board will make a determination as to whether or not to rehear the matter
and its decision shall be made at a public meeting, which will be reduced to writing and
mailed to the interested parties within 21 days after the determination is made. If the
Contractors' Licensing Board determines it will grant a rehearing, it may:
a. Schedule a hearing where the parties will be given the opportunity of
presenting evidence or argument limited by the Board to the specific reasons for which
the rehearing was granted; or
b. Modify or reverse its prior decision, without receiving further evidence,
providing that the change is based on a finding that the prior decision of the Board
resulted from a ruling on a question of law that the Board had been informed by its
counsel was an erroneous ruling and which ruling could affect the substantive decision.
The parties are further notified that upon the timely filing of a Notice of Appeal
within thirty (30) days you may have the decision of the Board reviewed pursuant to the
procedure set out herein. The Respondent may appeal a decision of the Board to the
Collier County Circuit Court. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo but shall be
limited to appellate review of the record created before the Board. Any appeal shall be
filed with the Circuit Court and served on the parties within thirty (30) days of the mailing
of the decision of the Board under the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County,
Page 5 of 7
319668.2 1/30/2014
Florida, Section 22-202(g)(9). If there has been a re-hearing request granted, the
appeal shall be filed with the Circuit Court and served on the parties within thirty (30)
days of the mailing of the re-hearing decision under Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, Section 22-205.
In the event that the Respondent elects to appeal, a verbatim record and
transcript of the proceedings will be necessary. It shall be the sole responsibility of said
party to ensure that a record is made from which a transcript may be prepared which
includes the testimony upon which an appeal may be taken. Neither Collier County nor
the Board has any responsibility to provide a verbatim record transcript of the
proceedings.
In accordance with Section 489.131(7) (c) and (d), Florida Statutes, the
disciplined contractor, the complainant, or the Department of Business and Professional
Regulation may challenge the Board's recommended penalty to the State Construction
Industry Licensing Board. Such challenge must be filed within sixty (60) days of the
issuance of the recommended penalty to the State Construction Industry Licensing
Board in Tallahassee, Florida. If challenged, there is a presumptive finding of probable
cause and the case may proceed before the State Board without the need for a
probable cause hearing.
Failure of the disciplined contractor, the complainant, or the Department of
Business and Professional Regulation to challenge the Board's recommended penalty
within the time period set forth herein will constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing
before the State Construction Industry Licensing Board and be deemed as an
Page 6 of 7
319668.2 1/30/2014
admission of the violation such that the penalty recommended will become a final order
according to the procedures developed by State Board rule without further State Board
action.
Pursuant to Section 120.59, Florida Statutes, the parties are hereby notified that
they may thereafter appeal the Final Order of the State Board by filing one copy of a
Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of the Department of Business and Professional
Regulation, Northwood Centre, 1940 Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792,
and by filing the filing fee and one copy of the Notice of Appeal with the appropriate
District Court of Appeal within thirty (30) days of the effective date of said State Board
Order.
ORDERED by the Contractors' Licensing Board effective the 15th day of
Jan ary, 2014.
1
Patrick White, Chairman
Contractors' Licensing Board
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the Board has been furnished to the
Respondent; and Mr. Michael Ossorio, Licensing Compliance Supervisor, 2800 North
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34103, on this-1) 1 ..y of an :ry, 2014.
Secretary/Contractors' Licensing Board
Page 7 of 7
319668.2 1/30/2014
CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
it*
) ory
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS )
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA )
)
Petitioner, )
) Case No: 2014-02
vs. ) License No. 201300000579
Seth B. Hollander )
d/b/a Hollander Construction Company, )
Inc., )
)
Respondent(s) )
)
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came on for public hearing before the Contractors' Licensing Board
(hereafter Board) on January 15, 2014, for consideration of the Administrative
Complaint filed against Seth B. Hollander dba Hollander Construction Company, Inc,
the "Respondent". Service of the Complaint was made in accordance with Section 22-
202 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The Board made
a finding of fact that the service conformed with the requirements of the Code of Laws
and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The Board having at said hearing heard
testimony under oath, received evidence, and heard arguments respective to all
appropriate matters, thereupon issues its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order of the Board as follows:
Page 1 of 7
319774.1 1/30/2014
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That Seth B. Hollander is the holder of record of Collier County License Number
201300000579.
2. That the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is the
complainant in this matter.
3. That the Board has jurisdiction of the person of the Respondent and that Seth B.
Hollander was present at the public hearing and was not represented by counsel at the
hearing on January 15, 2014.
4. All notices required by the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County,
Florida, have been properly issued, hand delivered and delivered by certified mail in
accordance with Section 22-202 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County,
Florida.
5. The evidence presented and testimony given established that the Respondent
acted in a manner that is in violation of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier
County, Florida, as follows: failed to provide worker's compensation insurance (Code of
Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, Section 22-201(6)), and is the one who
committed the act.
6. That the Contractors' Licensing Supervisor and Staff presented sworn testimony,
and the administrative complaint and exhibits thereto were admitted into evidence. The
Respondent was afforded an opportunity to present sworn testimony, exhibits, and to
cross examine the Contractors' Licensing Supervisor and witness. The Board was
Page 2 of 7
319774.1 1/30/2014
afforded an opportunity to ask questions of the Respondent and witness. The Board
determined that the allegations of fact as set forth in the Administrative Complaint, as to
the violation of Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, Section 22-
201(6) are true and therefore such facts are hereby found to be supported by the
evidence presented at the hearing.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The Conclusions of Law alleged and set forth in the Administrative Complaint as
were supported by the clear and convincing evidence presented at the hearing on
January 15, 2014, and said conclusions of law are hereby approved, adopted, and
incorporated herein, to wit, the Respondent violated Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, Section 22-201(6) in the performance of his contracting
business in Collier County by acting in violation of the section set out above with
particularity.
2. Collier County has jurisdiction over this contractor.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and
pursuant to the authority granted in Chapter 489, Florida Statutes, and the Code of
Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, by a vote of 7 in favor and 0 opposed,
a unamimous vote of the Board members present, the Respondent has been found in
violation as set out above.
Page 3 of 7
319774.1 1/30/2014
Further, it is hereby ORDERED, by a vote of 7 in favor and 0 opposed, a
unamimous vote of the Board members present, that the following disciplinary
sanction(s) and related order are hereby imposed upon the Respondent as holder of
Contractor's License Number 201300000579:
1. The Respondents license is suspended for a period of twenty-one (21) months to
run concurrent with the previously imposed probationary period.
2. Respondent is ordered to pay a fine in the amount of five thousand dollars
($5,000.00) on or before December 31, 2014.
3. Respondent is ordered to pay $525.00 in administrative and investigative costs to
the County within 90 days.
4. Respondent is to receive a public reprimand.
The Respondent, any other pally, the chairman of the Contractors' Licensing
Board, the Contractors' Licensing Board as a body, or the assistant county attorney who
tried the case may request a rehearing of any decision of the Contractors' Licensing
Board. A request for rehearing shall be in writing and shall be filed with staff and a copy
thereof should be delivered to all other parties within twenty (20) days from the date of
mailing or other method of delivery to the Respondent(s) of the Board's written decision.
A request for rehearing must be based only on the ground that the decision was
contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law that was
fundamental to the decision of the Board. The written request for rehearing must specify
the precise reasons therefore. The decision of the Board that is the subject of the
Page 4 of 7
319774.1 1/30/2014
rehearing request will remain in effect throughout the rehearing procedure unless the
Board orders otherwise.
The Board will make a determination as to whether or not to rehear the matter
and its decision shall be made at a public meeting, which will be reduced to writing and
mailed to the interested parties within 21 days after the determination is made. If the
Contractors' Licensing Board determines it will grant a rehearing, it may:
a. Schedule a hearing where the parties will be given the opportunity of
presenting evidence or argument limited by the Board to the specific reasons for which
the rehearing was granted; or
b. Modify or reverse its prior decision, without receiving further evidence,
providing that the change is based on a finding that the prior decision of the Board
resulted from a ruling on a question of law that the Board had been informed by its
counsel was an erroneous ruling and which ruling could affect the substantive decision.
The parties are further notified that upon the timely filing of a Notice of Appeal
within thirty (30) days you may have the decision of the Board reviewed pursuant to the
procedure set out herein. The Respondent may appeal a decision of the Board to the
Collier County Circuit Court. Such an appeal shall not be a hearing de novo but shall be
limited to appellate review of the record created before the Board. Any appeal shall be
filed with the Circuit Court and served on the parties within thirty (30) days of the mailing
of the decision of the Board under the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County,
Florida, Section 22-202(g)(9). If there has been a re-hearing request granted, the
appeal shall be filed with the Circuit Court and served on the parties within thirty (30)
Page 5 of 7
319774.1 1/30/2014
days of the mailing of the re-hearing decision under Code of Laws and Ordinances of
Collier County, Florida, Section 22-205.
In the event that the Respondent elects to appeal, a verbatim record and
transcript of the proceedings will be necessary. It shall be the sole responsibility of said
party to ensure that a record is made from which a transcript may be prepared which
includes the testimony upon which an appeal may be taken. Neither Collier County nor
the Board has any responsibility to provide a verbatim record transcript of the
proceedings.
In accordance with Section 489.131(7) (c) and (d), Florida Statutes, the
disciplined contractor, the complainant, or the Department of Business and Professional
Regulation may challenge the Board's recommended penalty to the State Construction
Industry Licensing Board. Such challenge must be filed within sixty (60) days of the
issuance of the recommended penalty to the State Construction Industry Licensing
Board in Tallahassee, Florida. If challenged, there is a presumptive finding of probable
cause and the case may proceed before the State Board without the need for a
probable cause hearing.
Failure of the disciplined contractor, the complainant, or the Department of
Business and Professional Regulation to challenge the Board's recommended penalty
within the time period set forth herein will constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing
before the State Construction Industry Licensing Board and be deemed as an
admission of the violation such that the penalty recommended will become a final order
Page 6 of 7
319774.1 1/30/2014
according to the procedures developed by State Board rule without further State Board
action.
Pursuant to Section 120.59, Florida Statutes, the parties are hereby notified that
they may thereafter appeal the Final Order of the State Board by filing one copy of a
Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of the Department of Business and Professional
Regulation, Northwood Centre, 1940 Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792,
and by filing the filing fee and one copy of the Notice of Appeal with the appropriate
District Court of Appeal within thirty (30) days of the effective date of said State Board
Order.
ORDERED by the Contractors' Licensing Board effective the 15th day of
nuary, 2014.
11 6 (Agi ,
Patrick White, Chairman
Contractors' Licensing Board
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the Board has been furnished to the
Respondent; and Mr. Michael Ossorio, Licensing Compliance Supervisor, 2800 North
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34103, on this' ( da • . -ry, 2014.
AlliSecretary/Contractors' Licensing Board
Page 7 of 7
319774.1 1/30/2014
CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS )
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA )
Petitioner, )
) CASE NO. 2014-02
vs. )
SETH B. HOLLANDER d/b/a HOLLANDER )
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Respondent. )
)
FINAL ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
THIS CAUSE came on for public hearing before the Board on March 19, 2014,
pursuant to the provisions of Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida
Section 22-204, in accordance with the written request for rehearing submitted by Seth
B. Hollander d/b/a Hollander Construction, Inc. ("Respondent"). The written request
from the Respondent being proper in form and all necessary notices having been issued
to the Respondent as required by the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County.
The Board having heard testimony under oath and heard arguments with respect to all
appropriate and relevant matters as provided in Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier
County, Florida Section 22-204, the Board finds as follows:
1
323787.1 3/25/2014
ORDER OF THE BOARD
The Board hereby denies the Respondent's Motion for Rehearing.
DONE AND ORDERED by a Vote of 8 for and 0 against, a unanimous vote of the
Board, this 19 day of March, 2014, at Collier County, Florida.
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING BOARD
COLLIER COUNT , FLORIDA
Thomas Lykos Vice Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
Order of the Board has been furnished to the Respondent, and Michael Ossorio,
Licensing Compliance Supervisor, 2800 N.- - . - .oe Drive, Naples, FL 34103 on
this?-< day of March, 2014.
-------(___—
Secretary/Contractors' Licensing Board
2
323787.1 3/25/2014