Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CLB Agenda 11/20/2013
CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD Agenda November 20 , 2013 Coil'fer County UAd COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD AGENDA NOVEMBER 20, 2013 9:00 A.M. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ROLL CALL II. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS: III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DATE: October 16, 2013 V. DISCUSSION: VI. NEW BUSINESS: (A) Herman Rudolph- Waiver of Examination(s) (B) Brian J. Cleary- Waiver of Examination(s) VII. OLD BUSINESS: (A) Orders Of The Board VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (A) Case 2013 -11- Eusebio Verrier (DBA) Tiki Huts Inc. IX. REPORTS: X. NEXT MEETING DATE: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2013 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING THIRD FLOOR IN COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS 3299 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34112 October 16, 2013 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD October 16, 2013 Naples, Florida LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Contractors' Licensing Board, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following Members present: Chairman: Richard Joslin Vice Chair: Patrick White Members: Michael Boyd Ronald Donino Terry Jerulle Kyle Lantz Thomas Lykos Robert Meister ALSO PRESENT: Michael Ossorio — Supervisor, Contractors' Licensing Office Kevin Noell, Esq. — Assistant County Attorney James F. Morey, Esq. — Attorney for the Contractors' Licensing Board Ian Jackson — Licensing Compliance Officer Rob Ganguli — Licensing Compliance Officer October 16, 2013 Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the Appeal is to be based. I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Richard Joslin called the meeting to order at 9:01 AM and read the procedures to be followed to appeal a decision. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Seven voting members were present. II. AGENDA — ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, OR CHANGES: Change: • Under Item VIII, "Public Hearings" o Case 2013 -09 will be heard following Item V, "Discussion." III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Thomas Lykos moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Vice Chairman Patrick White offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — AUGUST 21, 2013: Correction: Under Item VII -B, "Old Business," 2nd Paragraph: o Chairman "Jerulle" was changed to Chairman " Joslin." Thomas Lykos moved to approve the Minutes of the August 21, 2013 meeting as amended. Vice Chairman Patrick White offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 7 — 0. V. DISCUSSION Michael Ossorio, Supervisor — Contractors' Licensing Office, suggested scheduling the next meeting in either November or December and asked the members for their preference. Chairman Joslin stated he would not be available in December. Consensus: The Board will meet in November, but not in December. Mr. Ossorio noted the County Attorney's Office provided a copy of the Executive Summary which is included on the Agenda for the December 22"d meeting of the Board of County Commissioners. The changes to the Ordinance will be presented at the meeting and will be advertised prior to the meeting. The advertising will run for ten (10) days. 2 October 16, 2013 VIII. PUBLIC HEARING: (Note: Regarding case heard under Section VIII, the individuals who testified were first sworn in by the Attorney for the Board.) A. Case #2013 -09: BCC vs. Seth B. Hollander, d/b /a "Hollander Construction Company, Inc., LLC" Respondent Seth B. Hollander was present and represented by Henry Johnson, Esq. Chairman Joslin outlined the manner in which the Public Hearing will be conducted: • The Hearings will be conducted pursuant to the procedures contained in Collier County Ordinance 490 -105, as amended, and Florida Statutes, Title XXXII, "Regulation of Professions and Occupations, " Chapter 489. • The Hearings are quasi-judicial in nature. • Formal "Rules of Evidence" shall not apply. • Fundamental fairness and due process shall be observed and shall govern the proceedings. • Irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative evidence shall be excluded. • All other evidence of the type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs shall be admissible, whether or not such evidence would be admissible in a trial in the Courts of the State of Florida. • Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any evidence but shall not be deemed sufficient by itself to support a Finding, unless such hearsay would be admissible over objection in a civil action in Court. • The "Rules of Privilege" shall be effective to the same extent that such Rules are now, or hereafter may be, recognized in civil actions. • Any member of the Contractors' Licensing Board may question any witness before the Board. • Each party to the proceedings shall have the right to call /examine witnesses; to introduce Exhibits; to cross - examine witnesses; to impeach any witness regardless of which party called the witness to testify; and to rebut any evidence presented against the party. • The Chairperson or, in his/her absence, the Vice Chair, shall have all powers necessary to conduct the proceedings at the Hearing in a full, fair, and impartial manner, and to preserve order and decorum. • The general process of the Hearing is for the County to present an "Opening Statement" to set forth the charges and, in general terms, how the County intends to prove the charges. • The Respondent will present his /her "Opening Statement" setting forth, in general terms, defenses to the charges. • The County will present its "Case in Chief' by calling witnesses and presenting evidence. • The Respondent may cross - examine the witnesses. October 16, 2013 • After the County has closed its "Case in Chief," the Respondent may present his /her defense as described previously, i.e., to call and examine witnesses, to introduce Exhibits, to cross - examine witnesses, to impeach any witness regardless of which party called the witness to testify, and to rebut any evidence presented against the party. • After the Respondent has presented his/her case, the County will present a "Rebuttal" to the Respondent's presentation. • When the "Rebuttal" is concluded, each party is permitted to present a "Closing Statement." • The County is allowed a second opportunity to rebut the Respondent's "Closing Statement." • The Board will close the Public Hearing and begin deliberations. • Prior to beginning deliberations, the Board's Attorney will give a "Charge" to the Board, similar to the Charge given to a Jury, setting out the parameters on which the decision will be based. • During deliberations, the Board can request additional information and clarification from the parties. • The Board will decide two different issues: o Whether the Respondent is guilty of the offense as charged in the Administrative Complaint. A vote will be taken on the matter. o If the Respondent is found guilty, the Board must decide the sanctions to be imposed. • The Board's Attorney will advise the Board concerning the sanctions which may be imposed and the factors to be considered. • The Board will discuss the sanctions and vote. • After the matters are decided, the ChairNice Chair will read a Summary of the Order to be issued by the Board. The Summary is a basic outline of the Order and may not reflect the same language contained in the Final Order. • The Final Order will include complete details as required under State laws and procedures. (Kyle Lantz arrived @ 9:10 AM.) Ian Jackson, Licensing Compliance Officer, requested to enter the packet previously provided to the Board Members into evidence. Thomas Lykos moved to open the Public Hearing in Case No. 2013 -09: Board of County Commissioners vs. Seth B. Hollander, d/b /a "Hollander Construction Company, Inc., " License No.: 201300000579, and to enter the information packet into evidence as County's Exhibit "A." Kyle Lantz offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 8 — 0. Mr. Jackson presented the County's Opening Statement: • The County will prove that Seth Hollander violated Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, Section 22- 201(2), by contracting with the property owners of 0 October 16, 2013 Village on the Bay, LLC (Venetian Village) and/or The Lutgert Companies for work outside the scope of his competency as listed on his Competency card and as defined by Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, Section 22- 162(18), or as restricted by the Contractors' Licensing Board. Vice Chairman White asked Mr. Jackson to identify what was "outside the scope." Mr. Jackson referenced Exhibits E -11 (the Contract) and E -16 (the definition of an Excavation Contractor). Vice Chairman White requested further information concerning the County's position. Mr. Jackson referenced the following items listed on the Contract which the County considered to be outside the scope of the license currently held by the Respondent: • Line Item #12 — Sidewalk Pavers • Line Item # 13 — Pavers at Apron • Line Item #15 — 36 -inch Valley Gutter • Line Item #16— 12" x 12" Ribbon Curb • Line Item 420 — Striping and Signage He further stated Line Item #10 (6 -inch Base for Sidewalk Pavers) and Line Item #11 (1 -inch Sand for Sidewalk Pavers) could possibly be considered as incidental work for the construction of the pavers. i.e., as the sub -base material for the pavers. Vice Chairman White stated Line Items #10 and #11 could also be considered as not "outside the scope" because they were intended to secure the site to make it safe to walk. Ian Jackson responded the application or installation of the 12 -inch subgrade and the 6 -inch base for the sidewalk pavers could fall under the responsibilities of a Paving Block Contractor and not an Excavation Contractor. He admitted the definition of "Excavation" was broad. Vice Chairman White replied if the referenced items were to be considered within the scope, then an argument could be made as to why there may be some doubt in the County's mind, i.e., that the work was intended to secure and make the excavation site safe. Mr. Jackson admitted "there could be an argument." Vice Chairman White referenced Line Item #17 (6" Concrete Border Wedge — Pavers). Ian Jackson stated his position was the work was also outside the scope of excavation. Michael Ossorio noted the contract itself was at issue. He stated he considered it to be a contract for a paving certificate holder. He stated the County had presented its Opening Statement. Vice Chairman White responded the Opening Statement did not specifically mention what was considered as "outside the scope." October 16, 2013 Attorney Henry Johnson presented the Respondent's Opening Statement: • On or about September 25,2013, Ian Jackson contacted the Respondent at the job site and informed the Respondent that he was operating outside the scope of his Collier County license. • At the point in time that the Respondent was contacted by Mr. Jackson, he had entered into a contract with Village on the Bay, LLC which is a Lutgert related company. • While he had entered into the contract, he had not performed any work outside the scope of his license. • The contract contemplated work which may have been outside the scope of his license but he had not performed any work. • Immediately upon being contacted by the County, Mr. Hollander contacted Counsel. • Our office prepared an Addendum to the original Contract which was presented to Village on the Bay, LLC. • Village on the Bay, LLC, decided to amend its Contract. • Currently, the parties are discussing the language of the contract addendum. Mr. Johnson stated that any of the items listed in the Contract that the Board determines to be outside the scope of Mr. Hollander's license shall not, cannot, and will not be performed by Mr. Hollander's company. He further stated Mr. Hollander contacted the subcontractors, Commercial Concrete Systems, Inc. and Superior Interlocking Paving, Inc., and they have entered into proposal agreements with The Lutgert Companies/Village on the Bay, LLC. He reiterated Mr. Hollander's company will not provide any labor or services which would violate the parameters of his licensing requirements. Mr. Johnson continued the Opening Statement: • Mr. Hollander is aware that he is currently on probation with the Board. • He is a young man who is a long -time member of the Collier County community. • While he has good intentions, he needs guidance and our office is prepared to provide it. • He asked that the Board also assist in providing similar guidance. • There have been discussions with Mr. Ossorio and a more recent Credit Report has been provided to the Board as requested. • Mr. Hollander has attempted to be pro- active not only concerning the modification to his contract but also by asking the sub - contractors to directly contact The Lutgert Companies/Village on the Bay, LLC. • He also drove to Ocala to take the Paving Blocks Contractor examination in the event that the Board may, in the future, grant his application for such a license. • Mr. Hollander passed the examination with a score of 82 %. October 16, 2013 Mr. Johnson agreed the contract was beyond the scope of his original licensing requirements. He reminded the Board that no work had been performed which was outside the scope of Mr. Hollander's license. He further stated Mr. Hollander had been pro- active in limiting the terms of his contractual duties and, through Counsel's office, contacting Mr. Ossorio and making his best efforts to comply with the requirements. Ian Jackson presented the County's "Case in Chief:" • He agreed that no physical work outside of the scope of Mr. Hollander's license had been performed on or about September 25, 2013. • He referenced Exhibit E -19. Section 22 -162 provides the definition and qualifications of a contractor and states, "The attempted sale of contracting services and the negotiation or bid for a contract on these services also constitutes contracting. " • On September 25th Eric Lutgert sent an email to Michael Ossorio asking for a review of the construction contract between Village on the Bay, LLC and the Respondent. (See Exhibit E -10) • Exhibit E -11 is the contract for the parking extension for Venetian Village. The items considered as outside the scope of the Respondent's competency have been defined by Ordinance #90 -105, as amended. (See Exhibit E -16) • On September 26th, a Stop Work Order was issued to the Respondent by phone. • On September 26th Mike Hoyt, a representative of Village on the Bay, LLC, was advised of the licensing violation and the Stop Work Order. Mr. Jackson further stated he verified with the property owners that the contract had been restructured and additional contracts had been entered into with properly licensed contractors for their respective trades. • On September 27th, he met with the Respondent and explained the County's position. A Notice of Hearing was served upon the Respondent via hand- delivery on that day. Vice Chairman White asked if the hiring of the subcontractors "cured" the violation. Ian Jackson confirmed Commercial Concrete was hired to install the curbing. He further stated Mike Hoyt acknowledged that a paving block contractor had been contacted. Vice Chairman White asked how much of the violation remained since the Line Items from the original contract that were of concern to the County had been removed due to the hiring of other contractors, and Hollander Construction would not perform work outside the scope of his license. Mr. Jackson replied it was not as much a question of performing the work but being compensated for work that was not within the definition of an Excavation Contractor. October 16, 2013 Vice Chairman White noted there had been a "cure" which was relevant to the type of action which the Board could take. Respondent's Counsel admitted there had been a violation of a portion of the definition but due to the revisions of the contract, any of the work which the Respondent would perform in the future would be wholly within the scope of his license. Thomas Lykos noted the Respondent could be asked to provide copies of any subsequent contracts or the addendum to the original contract to confirm that the work, as it may move forward, has been contracted appropriately. He continued the issue presented by the County was whether or not the Respondent violated the Ordinance by contracting to do the work. Whether or not the work actually occurred was secondary. The issue at hand was whether or not the work was contracted outside the scope of the Respondent's license. Vice Chairman White stated there was an admission that there had been a violation to the degree that there was contracting outside the scope under the definition. Attorney Johnson questioned Ian Jackson: Q. The first contact you had with Mr. Hollander was on or about September 25, 2013, is that correct? A. That is correct. Q. Following your contact, Mr. Hollander was pro- active relative to making certain that certain work that was going to be performed under the original scope of the " Lutgert Contract" was removed from his contract? A. To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Hollander immediately contacted his customer and advised them of the issue and took steps to rectify it so the project could continue legally. Q. I think you said you also saw the "carve -out contract" which was the contract that was entered into directly by the subcontractors, Commercial Concrete and Superior Interlocking Paving. A. I saw a contract between Commercial Concrete and The Lutgert Companies. Q. Did Mr. Hollander in any way avoid speaking with you after you contacted him? A. Mr. Hollander missed two scheduled meetings at our office for the issuance of documents relative to the Hearing. Q. Do you know how many times Mr. Hollander's Counsel contacted your office and spoke with Mr. Ossorio regarding this matter? A. I could not give you an accurate number. Q. We had not spoken. Before today, all contact between Mr. Hollander and your office had been between a representative of my office and Mr. Ossorio. A. Correct. Q. Are you aware whether or not Mr. Hollander has provided an updated credit report? A. I believe Mr. Hollander has provided the credit report. 8 October 16, 2013 Q. To your knowledge, has he paid all license renewals and fees that are owed to Collier County at this time? A. I could not answer that. Kyle Lantz stated the initial contract has been changed and the concrete work will be done by Commercial Concrete and the paving work will be done by Superior. He asked if Mr. Hollander involved in selecting the subcontractors or if it had done by the Lutgert Companies. Terry Jerulle asked if a deposit had been paid pursuant to the terms of the initial contract. Attorney Johnson stated a deposit had been paid but he was not aware of the amount. Attorney Johnson presented the Respondent's "Case in Chief." • Mr. Hollander provided his personal information to the Board, i.e., residency status and educational background. Attorney Johnson questioned the Respondent: Q. Have you provided the updated credit report as requested to the Contractors Licensing Office which was forwarded to the Board? A. It has been. Q. Have your license renewal fees been paid and has your license been renewed? A. It has. Q. I understand that you entered into a contract, initially with The Lutgert Companies which ultimately was Village on the Bay, LLC. Is that correct? A. Yes. Q. The summary that was provided by the County at Exhibit E -11 was the original scope of work. Is that correct? A. That is correct. Q. On approximately September 25, 2013, you received contact from Mr. Ian Jackson. Is that correct? A. That is correct. Q. Regarding this contract? A. Right. Q. What did Mr. Jackson indicated to you at that time? To be best of your knowledge. A. That we had a potential issue of violation of contracting and within the hour, I was in the Contractors' Licensing [office] meeting with Mr. Jackson. Q. And did Mr. Jackson indicate to you that there were features of the contract that you had entered into that the County believed was outside the scope of your particular license? A. Yes he did. Q. What did he explain to you? October 16, 2013 A. That certain Line Items of the contract were outside of the scope of an Excavation [contractor]. Q. Did he go over with you any specific line items at that time? A. We did. We went through the contract line item by line item and picked out which could be in violation. Q. Did you have any specific recollection of any of the Line Items that were discussed with Mr. Jackson at that time? A. As far as ... ? Q. Which ones he thought were outside the scope of your license? A. I did. Q. Which ones were they as you look at Exhibit E -11? A. Line Item 13, Line Item 15, Line Item 16 and Line Item 17. Q. Anything else. A. Line Item 20 because I hadn't renewed the striping license. Q. As a consequence of Mr. Jackson's discussion with you, tell the members of the Board what you did, starting with the contractual arrangement between you and The Lutgert CompaniesNillage on the Bay, LLC. A. As far as ... ? Q. Did you discuss the fact that we need to modify this contract? A. Of course. Q. Was the contract modified? A. The contract was modified. Q. You then requested that Counsel prepare an Addendum to the contract, is that correct? A. That is correct. Mr. Johnson noted there was a policy in practice and acknowledged that the Respondent's documents should have been sent to the Contractors' Licensing Office last week. He stated an Addendum was prepared on or about September 28th and he would provide copies to the Board for their review. Seth Hollander concurred stating it was prepared on the "following Monday." Q. What did you do with the standard form of agreement between owner and contractor? A. I went to Lutgert and presented it to them and, at that time, they wanted revise their contract with a Change Order. Q. At that time, you presented an addendum to the standard form of agreement between owner and contractor that you had prepared by your Counsel, correct? A. Correct. Q. The Lutgert Companies indicated they wanted to modify the agreement but wanted to use their form of agreement. A. That is correct. Q. And did they present their form to you? A. They did but the total amount was incorrect. Q. So with The Lutgert Companies right now you have an understanding that there are certain scopes of the work that you are not to perform, is that correct? 10 October 16, 2013 A. That is correct. Q. At this point in time, it is just a matter of resolving the couple of dollars difference that you have with them? A. Yes. Q. As I understand it, there were two proposal agreements that were sent directly to The Lutgert Companies by Commercial Concrete Systems, is that correct? A. That is correct. Q. And by Superior Interlocking Paving, Incorporated? A. Also correct. Q. Do you have multiple copies of these [documents]? A. Those are the only two copies. Mr. Johnson stated he would share the copy with the Board. He showed a document to the Respondent and marked it as Respondent's Exhibit #1. Q. Do you recognize this document entitled, "Commercial Concrete Systems, Inc." and dated September 27, 2013? A. I do. Q. And what is that? A. That's a proposal to The Lutgert Companies from Commercial Concrete for the ribbons curb and the valley gutter. Q. And do you understand that this has been accepted by The Lutgert Companies? A. It has been accepted. Q. And since it has been accepted by The Lutgert Companies and it has excepted or taken out the scope of your work, correct? A. That is correct. Attorney Johnson asked to admit the document into evidence as Respondent's Exhibit #1. Vice Chairman White moved to accept Respondent's Exhibit #1 into evidence. Kyle Lantz offered a Second in support of the motion. Vice Chairman White asked if there were other documents. Mr. Johnson requested to admit the following documents into evidence: • Superior Interlocking Paving proposal, dated 10- 03 -13, as Respondent's Exhibit #2; • Addendum to the Standard Form of Agreement between Owner and Contractor as Respondent's Exhibit #3. Vice Chairman White asked if the contract was between Hollander Construction Company and The Lutgert Companies or Village on the Bay, LLC. Mr. Johnson clarified the Addendum was between Hollander Construction Company, Inc. and Village on the Bay, LLC. 11 October 16, 2013 Vice Chairman White amended his previous motion to include the documents as proffered by Attorney Johnson to include the three Exhibits as noted. Kyle Lantz offered a Second in support of the amended motion. Carried unanimously, 8 — 0. Q. Regarding Exhibit #2, to your knowledge, has the paving contractor contracted directly with The Lutgert Companies relating to the scope of the work contained in the proposal? A. To my knowledge, they have. Q. And has that specifically been taken out of any contractual arrangement which you have with The Lutgert Companies? A. Yes it has. Q. The Addendum to Standard Form of Agreement between Owner and Contractor what we discussed earlier, is that the document that you asked our office to prepare on your behalf? A. Yes. Q. And that was what was presented to The Lutgert Companies and Village on the Bay, LLC? I use them interchangeably. A. Yes. Q. And that is the agreement that we are waiting for The Lutgert Companies to come back with an appropriate, agreed upon dollar figure? A. That is correct. Q. Since being notified by Contractors' Licensing of the concerns which are the subject of this hearing, did you take any further pro- active action to attempt deal with the situation relating to licensing and testing? A. Yes, I have. Q. Can you tell the Board what you have done since September 25, 2013 in that regard. A. I had the County sponsor the licensing test for paving engineering contracting exam. I drove to Ocala and took the test. I passed. Q. Is it your desire to continue to engage in contracting under your present licensing authorization? A. Yes. Q. Would it be your desire — credit being an issue — and your ability to operate consistent with the mandates of Collier County and their licensing requirements — to be able at some time in the future to request of Collier County to have a paving engineering contracting license so you could engage in a greater scope of work consistent with what would have been the agreement between yourself and Village on the Bay, LLC? A. That is correct. Mr. Johnson stated he had no further questions for Mr. Hollander. Vice Chairman Johnson asked if the dollar amount of the Exhibits ( "carve out" contracts) would equal the adjusted price on the Addendum. Seth Hollander replied, "That is correct." 12 October 16, 2013 Terry Jerulle asked if Mr. Hollander had taken a deposit on the initial contract with The Lutgert Companies. A. Yes, I have. Q. What was that amount? A. It was 30% of the total. Q. So you have taken .... ? A. $17,000 and change. Q. You don't know the exact amount? A. Not with me. Q. So it is a percentage of the contract total? A. A percentage of the contract total. Q. So you have taken money on all of the items? A. Correct. Vice Chairman White: Q. Where there any deposits on either of the "carve out" contracts with the other contractors, either Commercial or Superior? A. Not to my knowledge. I don't know that for certain. Kyle Lantz: Q. Did you aid The Lutgert Companies in finding a paver company and a concrete company? A. Absolutely. Q. That's someone that you may have worked with in the past? A. That's correct, yes. Q. And were these people someone that you were going to "sub" out to? A. Yes, sir. Q. They are the same people who planned to do the original job? A. Yes. Q. Now they're just doing it — they're being paid — cutting you out of the loop — directly? A. That is correct. Terry Jerulle: Q. How many employees do you have? A. I have two. Q. Equipment operators? A. Yes. Q. Laborers? A. Both. Q. I noticed in the Addendum that you did not include the Drivable Grass Pavers? A. I did not. Q. Is that still in your contract? A. Yes, sir. Q. Are Drivable Grass Pavers something you can perform under your license? A. I spoke with ... that is correct, to my knowledge. 13 October 16, 2013 Q. And who is going to be setting those pavers? A. The Grass Pavers? Q. Yes. A. They're not actually "pavers." It's a plastic sheet —a honeycomb sheet —that is filled with sand so they can sod on top of it. It acts as soil stabilization ... you see it in fire lanes. Q. I'm familiar with it. Who is going to be installing those? A. My two guys or myself ... and myself. Thomas Lykos: Q. Mr. Hollander, in reviewing the items you have in Evidence, the concrete contract is very specific in what's included and what's in the dollar amount. And the paver contract is very specific in what's included and what's in the dollar amount. In your Amendment to the agreement, the original contract has items that have been lined through along with the associated dollar amounts. But there's no revised contract amount for this Addendum. One of the requirements for the Board to is determine if there has been any financial harm to the person you have contracted with. A. I understand. Q. One of the questions is — with all these changes, what is the net change to the dollar amount of the contract to the property owner? Because your revised contract does not have a revised dollar amount, do you have somewhere a document that shows what the new dollar amount is? That's the first part of my question. The other part is this has not been executed — this is a proposed amendment to the contract. But it is not an executed contract. It is an important consideration — this does not have a dollar amount on it and it has not been executed. The document is a little bit weak for my standards. Attorney Johnson reiterated the scope of the work has been removed and as Mr. Hollander stated he is working with The Lutgert Companies so that there will be no financial harm. There will be an agreed upon amount that the parties can live with and he is waiting for word from The Lutgert Companies. Mr. Hollander is doing the math with The Lutgert Companies. The scope has been dealt with but the dollar figure has not been agreed to. Q. Is that correct? A. That's correct. Mr. Johnson continued that they cannot yet present a document with a clear dollar figure. He stated The Lutgert Companies and Village on the Bay holds the cards and will decide what they feel is comfortable in order for his contract to proceed. There will be no harm to the owner because it, ultimately, will be ... the dollar figure will be negotiated. Thomas Lykos stated he understood the intent of the agreement. He asked if Village on the Bay came back with a number that would make it financially irresponsible for Mr. Hollander to continue with the project, the result would be an owner who entered into a contract for a fixed dollar amount for a fixed amount of 14 October 16, 2013 work and because Mr. Hollander was not licensed to perform the work — once you bring in the new entities and determine a new dollar amount, Mr. Hollander may be faced with a choice of doing the work at a loss at which case you will have vendors at risk of nonpayment if he takes on the job. Or, Mr. Hollander decides not to follow through on the contract in which case the owner would be forced to contract the project a new at a potentially higher dollar amount. In that situation, the owner would be faced with financial harm because the original contract would no longer valid. Vice Chairman White noted there may not be the capacity to perform any aspect of the original contract. It is a consideration. Mr. Hollander stated with regard to the dollar amounts and the remainder of the contract that could be paid to Hollander Construction, neither company would be at a loss or at risk. A. The original deposit was $17,400 and a few dollars. Between the Superior Interlocking Paving's proposal contract and Commercial Concrete's proposal, that equates to $17,100 and there's a total of $34,000 between those two. And you would deduct that from the total — the original contract total. Thomas Lykos noted another issue, i.e., there was a dollar amount in the contract allocated to the specific work itemized in the contract. For example, a Line Item for pavers of $12,000. The cost for Superior is $10,000. If Lutgert chose to remove the entire $12,000 for pavers, that would reduce the net contract amount by $2,000. He further stated he did not have a document which stated that all parties agreed that the work would be performed by outside trades for the exact dollar amount that was in the original contract. He continued the Amendment to the contract did not specify who was responsible for supervising the outside trades; who was responsible for their work; who was warrantying their work — they would not be working underneath you as the General Contractor. He asked the following questions: • Who would be responsible for overseeing the management of how that work coordinates with each other? • Who would be responsible for warrantying the subcontractors? • Will the subcontractors have a direct warranty with the owner? • What happens when your work affects their work? Will that warranty be void? And vice versa — will your warranty be void because their work affects your work? He stated there were unintended consequences that were created because Mr. Hollander contracted for work outside of his license. There are financial issues in addition to who would be ultimately responsible for the site and safety on the job site. Delays may or may not be caught because a subcontract was beyond your control and the contract may or may not have a "Time is of the Essence" Clause. The issues could arise because instead of one contractor being responsible for the entire project, it has been split up. The Amendment to the initial contract does not 15 October 16, 2013 address those issues. There is the potential for risk on the owner's part. There are a number of questions that have not been resolved. Seth Hollander stated that he understood Mr. Lykos' concerns. Vice Chairman White asked the Respondent what was his intent regarding how the items that were lined out in the Addendum would be performed and by whom. A. By the two companies that The Lutgert Companies hired directly — Superior and Commercial Concrete. Q. When you entered into the original contract, you were intending to either subcontract or to have those two entities directly contract with the owner? A. They were to be subcontractors. Q. Through you? A. Through me. Without putting words in anyone's mouth, a conclusion that could be reached by this Board is that you would have a continuing violation for acting as a General Contractor without a license. I want that to be understood by you. It is a clear point of departure for the concerns we have and how we would weigh what the disciplinary action should be in this case. From my perspective, for someone on probation to have that intent is a serious concern. Unless or until you have a General Contractor's license, it would be a situation where the County would continually find violations. I want this to be readily understood. Robert Meister directed his question to Mr. Ossorio, stating as a General Contractor when he bids on a contract knowing there were functions to be performed that were outside the scope of his license, is there any connection to what the Respondent was doing, Le, contracting outside our scope of work? Michael Ossorio replied there is a Statute which states that a Tier -1, General Building Residential Contractor shall sub -out the electrical and mechanical work but could contract for it. It is totally separate from what the Respondent did. Vice Chairman White stated it was contemplated under the law as a standard accepted business practice. He further stated what was not contemplated was for a Specialty Contractor in one trade to contract for and subcontract to others who were outside the scope of the contractor's license. That would be a continuing violation. Mr. Ossorio noted there are some Specialty Contractors who sub within their field. For example, a licensed floor covering contractor might sub -out a job to another contractor but that's within the same scope of the license so it would not be "contracting." Chairman Joslin asked if there were additional questions and suggested presentation of Closing Statements would be the next step. Attorney Morey noted if further questioning was necessary after the Public Hearing was closed, the case could be re- opened. Chairman Joslin asked Mr. Jackson to present the County's Closing Statement. T October 16, 2013 Ian Jackson: • The County has shown through documented facts, sworn testimony, and the acknowledgment of the Respondent's Counsel that the Respondent violated Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, Section 22- 201(2), by contracting with the property owner of Venetian Village/Village on the Bay, LLC and /or The Lutgert Companies for work outside the scope of his competency as listed on his Competency Card and as defined in Collier County Ordinance #90 -105, as amended, Section 22- 162(18), or as restricted by the Contractors' Licensing Board. Attorney Johnson presented the Respondent's Closing Statement: • The Board will make a determination as to whether in fact the actions taken by Hollander Construction, upon notification, takes us out of any disciplinary action at this point in time. • I would respectfully submit that a careful reading of the Statute may be necessary to determine whether or not "contracting" or the taking of a deposit in and of itself would constitute a prima facia violation. • If the Board finds that there is a violation, I think the evidence shows that there is the need for some guidance for Mr. Hollander so that he can become a functioning contractor in Collier County. Vice Chairman White: Q. Is it the Respondent's position that there was an admission of guilt as to that portion of the definition or is it your defense that, under the definition, that there is no violation and the Board should find there was none. Attorney Johnson: A. I think the Board should find that there was no violation in the light of the evidence that was presented. Thomas Lykos moved to approve closing the Public Hearing Terry Jerulle offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 8 — 0. Chairman Joslin confirmed the Public Hearing was closed. Chairman Joslin asked the Board's Attorney to present the Charge. Attorney Morey outlined the Charge to the Board: • The Board shall ascertain in its deliberations that fundamental fairness and due process were accorded to the Respondent. • That, pursuant to Section 22- 203(g) (5) of the Codified Ordinance, the formal Rules of Evidence set out in Florida Statutes shall not apply. • The Board shall consider solely the evidence presented at the Hearing in its deliberation of the matter. • The Board shall exclude from its deliberations irrelevant, immaterial, and cumulative testimony. 17 October 16, 2013 • The Board shall admit and consider all other evidence of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs, whether or not such evidence would be admissible in a Court of Law. • Hearsay evidence may be used to explain or supplement any other evidence but hearsay, by itself, is not be sufficient to support a Finding unless such hearsay would be admissible over objection in a civil action in Court. • The Standard of Proof in actions where a Respondent may lose his/her privileges to practice his/her profession is that the evidence presented by the Complainant must prove the Complainant's case in a clear and convincing manner. • The Burden of Proof on the Complainant is a larger burden than the "Preponderance of Evidence" standard set in civil cases. • The Standard of Evidence is to be weighed solely as to the charges set out in the Complaint. • The only charges the Board may decide upon are the ones to which the Respondent has had an opportunity to prepare a defense. • The damages awarded by the Board must be directly related to the charges. • The decisions made by the Board shall be stated orally at the Hearing and are effective upon being read, unless the Board orders otherwise. • The Respondent, if found guilty, has certain appeal rights to the Contractors' Licensing Board, the Courts, and the State's Construction Industry Licensing Board ( "CILB "), if applicable. • The Board shall vote upon the evidence presented in all areas and if the Respondent is found in violation, shall adopt the Administrative Complaint. • The Board shall also make Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in support of the charges set out in the Complaint. Chairman Joslin opened the floor to discussion. Vice Chairman White moved that the evidence presented was clear and convincing that under the County's definition of "contracting" in Section 22 -162 as set forth in Exhibit E -19 in the information packet indicates that a violation of that definition and regulation prohibiting a Contractor from operating outside the scope of his/her license has occurred. Thomas Lykos offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 8 0. Attorney Morey noted the Board found the Respondent to be guilty and the Respondent is a Collier County licensed Contractor. He further stated holders of Collier County Certificates of Competency who have been found to be guilty, the Contractors' Licensing Board may, but is not required to, impose any of the following Sanctions, either alone or in combination: (1) Revocation of a Collier County (or City) Certificate of Competency, (2) Suspension of a Collier County (or City) Certificate of Competency, (3) Denial of the issuance or renewal of a Collier County (or City) Certificate of Competency, 18 October 16, 2013 (4) Imposition of a period of probation, not to exceed two years in length, during which time the Contractor's contracting activity shall be under the supervision of the Collier County Contractors' Licensing Board, (5) Imposition of a fine not to exceed $5,000, (6) Issuance of a public reprimand, (7) Requirement for re- examination or participation in a duly- accredited program of continuing education directly related to the Contractor's contracting activity, (8) Recovery of reasonable investigative costs incurred by the County for the prosecution of the violation, and (9) Denial of the issuance of Collier County or City building permits or requiring the issuance of such permits with specific conditions. Attorney Morey further advised the Board that, when imposing any of the possible Disciplinary Sanctions on a Contractor, the Contractors' Licensing Board may consider all the evidence presented during the Public Hearing as well as: (1) The gravity of the violation; (2) The impact of the violation on public Health/Safety or Welfare; (3) Any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation(s); (4) Any previous violations committed by the violator, and (5) Any other evidence presented at the Hearing by the parties relevant to the Sanction which is appropriate for the case, given the nature of the violation(s) or the violator. Discussion: • Kyle Lantz stated Mr. Hollander has been described as "proactive" but he was actually "re- active." Had he been proactive, he would have consulted his attorney first before entering into any contract. Proactive would have been to take the test and obtain his license before entering into the contract. • Vice Chairman White stated the Respondent did take corrective action. He noted the other case was not based upon probation — that probation was a follow -up compliance action to provide an improved credit report. He did not consider the requirement for an updated credit report to be a negative factor in weighing what the disciplinary action should be. Thomas Lykos commented: • It is the Board's responsibility to uphold the Ordinance. The Board previously further defined what the term "contracting" meant to clear up some vagueness. • While we need to consider the probation, had the credit report been sufficient, in theory, we could have taken the Respondent off probation in September. Then this case would have been solely about working outside the scope of his license and the probation would not have been relevant to the case. 19 October 16, 2013 • The probation was based on the credit report and not on a violation. It is not trade - related or work related. We will deal with the credit issue in another part of the meeting. • He asked what was the real gravity of the violation but the fact that Mr. Hollander was reactive and the work was not done, mitigated what could have been considered to be a grave violation. • He stated the impact on the public was not yet known because a revised contract was not presented to the Board to review. Since a safety issue was not created in this situation, there was very little impact to the public. • Regarding corrective action, the Board's responsibility is to bring people into compliance. It is a Contractor's responsibility to know the law. However, if a Contractor is made aware of the law and takes corrective action, it is an important consideration. The Respondent in reacting, did as much as he could do to correct the action that was taken. • Previous violations: since the previous probation was based on credit, there were no previous violations. • Is Mr. Hollander guilty of violating the Ordinance: Yes. ■ In terms of the gravity and impact on the public, it is very small and should be taken into consideration when determining disciplinary action. • Terry Jerulle noted The Lutgert Companies, which is the public, still may be harmed. He stated the Respondent took $17,000 and it is not known whether or not he will be able to finish the project. If the numbers do not work, the Respondent may not go back. The Board does not know what he did with the money. Lengthy discussion continued. Kyle Lantz pointed out the difference between contracting is not necessarily doing the work but writing the contract to do it. There was a clear consensus among the Board members. Contracting is offer, bid, contract. The Respondent pled not guilty. It is not a grey area to us. The Respondent wrote a contract that he was not licensed to do. Our job is to make sure he understands what is right and wrong — what you are allowed to do. By stating "it's a grey area" — he does not know what is right or wrong. Chairman Joslin concurred that Mr. Lantz had clarified the gravity of the violation. Vice Chairman White asked what costs were incurred by the County. Michael Ossorio stated the total was $620. • Thomas Lykos stated while he appreciated the comments from the Board members, he believes that part of the Board's job is to remove obstacles to 20 October 16, 2013 opportunity. He stated he was still conflicted concerning the correct disciplinary action and asked for comments from each member. • Vice Chairman White supported imposing probation of two years; a fine of $5,000 to be paid within thirty days; payment of costs of $620 to the County within thirty days. He continued, if necessary, Lutgert Companies is to compensated for its loss, if any, from the original contract. If the County is made aware of any future business opportunities, there will an opportunity to assist and educate. Chairman Joslin summarized Mr. White's recommendations: • Probation for two years; • A fine of $5,000 to be paid within in thirty days; • Payment of investigative costs of $620 to be paid within thirty days. Michael Ossorio noted if The Lutgert Companies provides documentation of misconduct in the future, there is a provision in the Code to handle it. • Michael Boyd stated he agreed with Vice Chairman White's proposal. He asked why did Lutgert wait until September to call when the contract was begun in July. He asked Mr. Ossorio if a reason was provided. • Ian Jackson replied an issue of non - performance prompted the email communication from Mr. Lutgert. • Mr. Boyd stated he thought the fine was a bit high but if the complaint was due to non - performance, he would accept it. • Ron Donino stated he also supported Mr. White's proposal. Discussion continued concerning the amount of the fine, possibly extending the time to repay the fine, whether or not the deposit was verified, and the County monitoring the Respondent's future business. Terry Jerulle stated he would require the Respondent to take (and pass) the Business Law test. He would reduce the amount of the fine to ensure that the project was finished. He would require the payment to the County of $620. He also would like to see proof provided by The Lutgert Companies that there was no harm to the owner. He agreed with monitoring by the County of any future business and imposition of a two -year probation. He was not sure how much to reduce the fine. Attorney Johnson stated the Respondent would cooperate with whatever the Board decides. He requested to reduce the fine to the greatest extent possible and increase the time limit to pay it. Thomas Lykos stated if the Board eliminates Mr. Hollander's opportunity to fulfill the contract, the owner may be put in a worse position. He suggested if the Respondent presented documentation that the job was completed, the fine could be reduced to $3,000 to be paid within 90 days. 21 October 16, 2013 Chairman Joslin stated he agreed with most of the comments made by the Board members. He supported reducing the fine to ensure that the job is completed correctly by the Respondent. He would agree to a fine of $3,000 to be paid within 90 days as well as payment of the investigative costs. He stated he was disturbed that the Board had approved the Respondent's prior application for a license and waived his requirement a test and then he went out and did what he did. Kyle Lantz moved to approve the following: • Imposition of a two-year probation; • Requiring the Respondent to reimburse the County for investigative costs in the amount of $620 to be paid by November 1, 2013; • Imposition of a fine of $2,500 to be paid in five equal monthly installments commencing December 1, 2013; • Requiring the Respondent to take and pass the Business Procedures test within six months. • If any of the conditions are not met, the Respondent's license will automatically be suspended until the following Board meeting where he will be required to appear. Vice Chairman White offered a Second in support of the motion and suggested the Respondent assure the Board there was no net loss to the owner under all the contracts written prior to the Hearing. Mr. Lantz restated his motion as follows: • Imposition of a two-year probation; • Requiring the Respondent to reimburse the County for investigative costs in the amount of $620 to be paid by November 1, 2013; • Imposition of a fine of $2,500 to be paid in five equal monthly installments commencing December 1, 2013, and due on the first business day of each month; • Requiring the Respondent to take and pass the Business Procedures test within six months. • The Respondent is to provide proof that there was no net loss to the owner. • If any of the above conditions are not met, the Respondent's license will automatically be suspended until the following Board meeting where he will be required to appear. Vice Chairman. White offered a Second in support of the amended motion. It was noted that payment is to be made at the Contractors' Licensing Office and checks are payable to the Board of County Commissioners. There will not be a pre- payment penalty. Vice Chairman White noted that while the motion did not require the Respondent to report all future jobs to the Contractors' Licensing Office, he was certain that there would be some form of monitoring. Chairman Joslin called for the vote. Carried unanimously, 8 — 0. 22 October 16, 2013 Chairman Joslin outlined the Board's Order: This cause came on for public hearing before the Contractors' Licensing Board on October 16, 2013 for consideration of the Administrative Complaint in Case #2013 -09 filed against Seth B. Hollander, d/b /a "Hollander Construction Company, Inc." the holder of record of Collier County Certificate of Competency Number 201300000579. Service of the Complaint was made in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 90 -105, as amended. The Board, at this Hearing, having heard testimony under oath, received evidence and heard arguments respective to all appropriate matters, and thereupon issued its Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law as follows. Findinzs of Fact: • Seth B. Hollander, d/b /a "Hollander Construction Company, Inc.," is the holder of record of Collier County Certificate of Competency Number 201300000579. • The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, Contractors' Licensing Board is the Petitioner (Complainant) in this matter. • The Board has jurisdiction of the person of the Respondent. • Respondent, Seth B. Hollander, was present at the Public Hearing and was represented by Counsel at the Hearing held on October 16, 2013. • The Respondent had been properly noticed concerning the Hearing. • All notices required by Collier County Ordinance 90 -105, as amended, had been properly issued and were personally delivered. • The Respondent acted in a manner that is in violation of Collier County Ordinances and is the one who committed the act. • The allegations of fact as set forth in Administrative Complaint as to: o Count 1, under Section 22- 201(2) of Ordinance #90 -105, as amended: "Contracting to do any work outside the scope of his competency as listed on his Competency Card and as defined defined in this Article or restricted by the Contractors' Licensing Board" has been found to be supported by the evidence presented at the Hearing. P The case was referred via an email on September 25, 2013 from Erik Lutgert to Michael Ossorio concerning a contract between Hollander Construction Company, Inc. and The Lutgert Companies/Village on the Bay, LLC for a parking extension at Venetian Village. It was found that Seth Hollander /Hollander Construction Company, Inc., qualified with a Collier County Excavation Certificate, had contracted for complete construction of a parking extension at the Venetian Village. Line Items found on the contract were out of the scope of a Collier County Excavation Contractor as defined in Collier County Ordinance 2006 -46, Section 1.6.3(18). Conclusions of Law: • The Conclusions of Law alleged and set forth in the Administrative Complaint as to Count 1 has been approved, adopted and incorporated herein, to wit: 23 October 16, 2013 "The Respondent violated Section 22- 201(2) of Collier County Ordinance 90 -105, as amended, in the performance of his contracting business in Collier County by acting in violation of the Section set out in the Administrative Complaint with particularity." Order of the Board: • Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and pursuant to the authority granted in Chapter 489, Florida Statutes, and in Collier County Ordinance 90 -105, as amended, by a vote of eight (8) in favor and none (0) in opposition, a majority vote of the Board members present, the Respondent has been found in violation as set out above. • Further, it is hereby ordered by a vote of eight (8) in favor, and none (0) in opposition, a majority vote of the Board members present, that the following disciplinary sanctions and related Order are hereby imposed upon the holder of Collier County Certificate of Competency #201300000579, Seth B. Hollander, to wit: • Imposition of a two -year period of probation; • Reimbursement to the County for investigative costs in the amount of $620 to be paid by November 1, 2013; • Imposition of a fine of $2,500 to be paid in five equal monthly installments commencing December 1, 2013, and due on the first business day of each month; • Requiring the Respondent to take and pass the Business Procedures test within six months; and • The Respondent is to provide proof that there was no net loss to the property owner. • If any of the above conditions are not met, the Respondent's license will automatically be suspended until the following Board meeting where he will be required to appear. Chairman Joslin noted the case was closed. BREAK: 11:13 AM RECONVENED: 11:26 AM V1. NEW BUSINESS: (Note: With reference to the cases heard under Section VI, the individuals who testified were first sworn in by the Attorney for the Board.) A. Cruz Olivarez — Review of Credit Report(s) Chairman Joslin noted Mr. Olivarez was appearing before the Board for review of his credit report. He stated Mr. Olivarez applied for a Specialty Trade License for cabinet installation. His company is "Cruz Woodworks, LLC." He further noted there were some derogatory items in the credit report. 24 October 16, 2013 Mr. Olivarez explained: • There were three items: a civil judgment and the Federal tax liens which have been paid. • The tax liens were paid in 2008 but he did not provide a copy of the Release to the Credit Bureau. • He obtained documentation of payment from the IRS. Chairman Joslin asked if the documents were to be entered into evidence. Vice Chairman White moved to approve entering the documentation, consisting of three separate exhibits, provided by Mr. Olivarez into evidence. Kyle Lantz offered a second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 8 — 0. Mr. Olivarez confirmed the items placed for collection have been paid. He stated he called the collection companies and paid the balance due. Thomas Lykos noted most of the verification of experience was from Pennsylvania and advised Mr. Olivarez to be sure he understood the limits of his license in Collier County and to not work outside the scope. Cruz Olivarez replied that listening to the previous case provided a great deal of information. Vice Chairman White moved to approve the application of Cruz Olivarez for a Specialty Trade License (cabinet installation) based upon his improved credit report and documentation verifying payment of outstanding items. Thomas Lykos offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 8 — 0. B. Michael J. Arlett — Contesting Citation Citation: #8021 ( "Unlicensed Painting Contractor ") Date Issued: August 14, 2013 Fine: $300.00 Description of Violation: Engage in the business or act in the capacity of a Contractor, or advertise self or business organization as available to engage in the business of, or act in the capacity of a Contractor, without being duly registered or certified. Chairman Joslin asked Mr. Arlett to explain why he was contesting the Citation issued by Rob Ganguli. Michael Arlett stated: • He is a faux artist — he faux stains woodwork in Lee County • He received an offer for work in Collier County —it was a high profile job • He was in the scope of what he recognizes as his trade — he had no fear of doing anything illegal 25 October 16, 2013 • The work consisted of four entry doors for a clubhouse which he stripped and conditioned. • During the time, he was contacted by Rob Ganguli who asked if he was a licensed painting contractor. • He responded that he was a licensed faux artist • He stated he was unaware that he was in violation of Collier County's Code • He is contesting the Citation based on the interpretation of "painting" versus "staining." • He uses specialized tints and color matches the doors. In this case, the mahogany doors were of different shades. • He completed the work within ten days. • He requested clarification of the limits of his areas of operation within Collier County. Rob Ganguli, Licensing Compliance Officer: • The definition of a Painting Contractor is "black and white" and was the basis for issuing the Citation. • He stated Exhibit E -11 cited the "finishing of both exterior and interior work." • He referenced Exhibit E -7 which was a photograph of the door that Mr. Arlett had been hired to finish. The scope of work for one door was contractor to finish for the sum of $4,800. (See Exhibit E -6). • Mr. Arlett stated he had a ten -day time frame to complete the work. • He stated he observed the finishing of the door based upon the definition in the Ordinance. Michael Ossorio confirmed after the Citation was issued, the project was completed by a licensed Painting Contractor. Mr. Ganguli stated Mr. Arlett explained he had been on the payroll of Magic Touch Painting in the past and he contacted the Qualifier of the company, explained the situation and the company hired Mr. Arlett as an employee to complete the project. Vice Chairman White asked Mr. Ganguli if he knew what the scope of work was under the Lee County license for a faux painter. Mr. Ganguli referred to Exhibit E -12 which provided a definition of faux painting. He stated his previous experience with "faux painting" was when an individual stenciled a drawing onto a finish surface. He stated he did not review the Lee County provision. Michael Arlett stated faux painting encompasses a wide range of decorative painting techniques. Mr. White explained he was interested in the distinction between faux finishing as an artist and painting — whether it is "faux' or not. He stated the County's argument was whether it was faux or not, it was painting. If it's painting, you need a Painting Contractor's license. 26 October 16, 2013 Michael Arlett requested the definition of Painting Contractor. Vice Chairman White explained the scope of work includes "... using spray equipment as well as hand tools to finish both exterior and interior work. A painting contractor may do paperhanging, sandblasting, waterproofing, and may clean/paint roofs. " He continued that the work being done — finishing an exterior door — under the County's definition would seem to be painting. Mr. Arlett clarified that he stains and matching colors by using tints as opposed to a general painting contractor who would probably not go to that extent. Vice Chairman White concurred that Mr. Arlett may have a level of expertise that is "above and beyond" a painting contractor, Collier County does not have a license for someone who includes painting. He stated if you don't have a Painting Contractor's license, you cannot do the "stuff' that is beyond painting. The definition provided by Mr. Ganguli stated faux "painting" — not staining. Terry Jerulle noted Mr. Arlett had a business license as an artist in Lee County. He asked Mr. Ganguli if there was also a business license for an artist in Collier County. He requested the definition from Collier County. Mr. Ganguli replied there may not be a tax receipt for a faux artist. Michael Ossorio clarified a faux artist will sign an affidavit that he or she will not paint; will not use a roller or hand tools, or perform any type of finish work. They will stencil or work using a sponge. The affidavit is signed before they can obtain a faux artwork license. Mr. White reiterated the County's Ordinance did not license faux artists. Thomas Lykos noted, as a general rule, a painter applies a primer or base and final coats of paint while the faux painter applies a decorative finish. Most faux artists work for a painting companies. He stated Mr. Arlett had applied a protective coating to the doors which meant he removed the existing finish and applied a new one — that is what a painting contractor does. Vice Chairman White stated the simple answer would be for Mr. Arlett to apply for a Collier County Painting Contractor's license if he intends to seek additional work in Collier County. Kyle Lantz stated the Lee County Business Tax Receipt specifies "no base painting coat." Vice Chairman White reiterated that Mr. Arlett had no real defense. He needs a Painting Contractors license. Michael Ossorio clarified the Business Tax Receipt is not a "license" — it is a receipt for taxes paid to conduct business in a particular County. Mr. Arlett has a Lee County Business Tax Receipt. Mr. Arlett stated he wanted a definition between painting and staining. Mr. White stated if a base coat is applied, regardless of the material, it is considered to be painting in Collier County. In Mr. Arlett's case, he used hand tools, such as sand paper, to remove an old finish and apply a new protective coating — that action 27 October 16, 2013 crossed the line from faux to real painting which falls under the definition of Painting Contractor in Collier County, regardless of what Lee County allows. Michael Ossorio stated to obtain a Painting Contractor's exam an applicant must answer various questions. The scope of the test includes prep work, staining, and finishing. He further stated the Painting Contractor's test is one of the more difficult tests given. Attorney Morey outlined the Board's options when a Citation is issued for a violation: the Board may impose a penalty of up to $1,000 but not less than $300.00. The Board could also waive the penalty if the violation had been corrected prior to appearing before the Board. Vice Chairman White moved to approve upholding the Citation issued to Michael Arlett and assessing a fine of $300 to be paid on a timely basis. Thomas Lykos offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 8 — 0. (Mr. White left at 12:07 PM.) C. Joseph M. Palmer — Reinstatement of License without Re- Testing Michael Ossorio provided background information: • Mr. Palmer has multiple licenses in other jurisdictions. • He has kept his continuing education requirements in other jurisdictions. • Only his Collier County license was allowed to lapse. • He recommended waiving the testing requirement. Kyle Lantz moved to approve granting Mr. Palmer's application to reinstate his Collier County license without requiring testing. Terry Jerulle offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. VII. OLD BUSINESS: A. Orders of the Board Thomas Lykos moved to approve authorizing the Chairman to sign the Orders of the Board. Terry Jerulle offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. B. Seth Hollander — Six month Review of Credit Report Michael Ossorio noted Mr. Hollander had been placed on probation due to credit issues. He stated the updated credit report was issued on October 8, 2013. Seth Hollander explained: • He contacted Kelly Tractor and a payment arrangement is in place. • The Caterpillar equipment was repossessed and he has contacted Caterpillar Financial regarding the judgment that was filed to work out a payment plan. He stated the equipment was sold for more than what he owed 28 October 16, 2013 • The Tax Lien for sales tax has been satisfied. Michael Ossorio confirmed Mr. Hollander requested to remain on probation. Thomas Lykos stated the probation should be extended for an additional six at which time Mr. Hollander will present an updated credit report to the Board. He suggested that a written plan for payment of the civil judgment (Kelly) and payment of other debts also be provided at that time. Terry Jerulle stated while Mr. Hollander's credit has improved, good credit is necessary in order to grow a business. He agreed with Mr. Lykos' suggestions. Michael Ossorio noted Mr. Hollander took the test for a Paving Contractor's license. If he wished to submit an application for the license, he would be present an updated report. Mr. Lykos stated he would not be comfortable supporting an application for a second license while the applicant was only two months into a previous probation. He noted the more that is done to solve his financial issues will impress the Board. There was discussion concerning when Mr. Hollander could apply to the Board. Michael Ossorio explained the procedure and noted he could apply for early release of probation if all conditions had been satisfied. Thomas Lykos moved to approve extending the probation for the credit issues for an additional six month. Mr. Hollander will be required to return in six months to present an updated credit report together with a written plan to address the civil judgment (Kelly Tractor) and pay the remainder of his debts. Michael Boyd offered a Second in support of the motion. Carried unanimously, 7— 0. IX. REPORTS: • Michael Ossorio noted the September was a renewal month for County licenses and Contractors' Licensing achieved its targeted number. X. MEMBER COMMENTS: (None) XI. NEXT MEETING DATE: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 BCC Chambers, P Floor — Administrative Building "F," Government Complex, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Chairman at 12:30 PM. OR October 16, 2013 COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS LICENSING BOARD Richard Joslin, Chairman The Minutes were approved by the Vice Chairman on , 2013, "as submitted" U OR "as amended" [_]. 30 Brian J. Cleary 13771 Tonbridge CT Bonita Springs, FL 34135 October 28, 2013 Collier County Licensing Board 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 To whom it may concern: I am writing this letter in hopes of getting my Collier County Pool Cleaner License, #33994 reinstated Unfortunately, the last couple of years, I have met with a number of medical issues. At first I injured my back and was laid up for some time under Doctor's supervision and physical therapy. I was just getting back on my feet, when I was struck down with a battle with kidney disease. I was forced to undergo surgery, and am hoping this problem will not reoccur. During this time period, I thought I was keeping up with all my business responsibilities, Lee County Pool Cleaner license, Certified Pool Operator license, however, it has been brought to my attention recently that the renewal license for Collier county was either lost in transit or overlooked in my mailings. Please accept my apology for this occurrence and any inconvenience this situation may have presented. It is my hope that this error can be rectified as soon as possible and please contact me immediately if there is any additional paperwork to be filed for the re- instatement. Again, I am very sorry for this mistake and look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Brian J. Cleary Bonita Beach Pools, LLC 13771 Tonbridge Ct Bonita Springs, FL 34135 CDES Operations & Regulatory Management Licensing Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 APPLICATION FOR COLLIER COUNTY/CITY OF NAPLES /CITY OF MARCO FIRM 1� 9 ! 11 91; NOV BY: ............ _ ......... INSTRUCTIONS: This application must be typewritten or legibly printed. The application fee must accompany, this application. The fee is not refundable_ after the .application has been accepted and entered on the records. All checks should be made payable to the Board of Collier County Commissioners. For further information, consult Collier County Ordinance No. 90 =105, as amended. NAME OF COMPANY: .. Exact Corporate %Business Name: J.zJ TY} i,� ,�J Fiction Name /DBA: Qualifier Name: Physical Address: 1 3'7 �� 1 (Number & Street) Mailing Address: (Number & Street) Telephone: 3`i' --�Z2 Z 3 ( -00 TYPE OF LICE Q General Q Building L4 Residential Q Mechanical Q Roofing NSE: $230.00 $2.30.00 $230.00 $230.00 $230.00 Specialty trade: CHANGE OF STATUS: ( ) Po;,Cfofnt not / \ C-�.., rte__ n.._.,_ _ _ _ _ (City) (State) (Zip (Cit3') `(State) (Zip y" E =Mail: J C? /*,i: Q Electrician $230.00 Q. Plumber $230.00 0 Air Cond. $230.00 Q Swiraming Pool $230.00 A�\f Specialty $205.00 , Reinstatement Fee= $205.00 2011 -2013 Back year fees= $370.00 2013 Renewal Fee= $125.00 1. The names, titles, home address and phone `n`jumberrs of all Officers /Managing Members of. the Firm. /K 0-VA1 At 2. List all businesses, :firms, entities or contracting businesses you have been associated with during the last ten years (ex. Held a license for or been a partner). Attach extra pages if needed. t. 2- .z -- - - , 3. List all debts you or any company(s).associated with you refused to pay and the reasons for the refusal to pay. Attach extra pages if needed. ^/ Jam' G AFFIDAVIT S certify that the .foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Authorize Officer of Firm STATE QF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing Instrument as acknowledged before me this _ (Date) gyr' /c,� of �c'��'tTI L�� (Name of officer, title /agent) � ) Z5 (Name of Corporation) a Corporation on behalf of the corporation. (State or Place of Corporation) He/She has-produced identification and did not take an oath. (Type of identification) NOTARY'S SEAL ,�,ti'�" e�a�e.eRUNeR (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) Y). ?►: r MY COMMISSION 4 FF 859,59 QUALIFIER INFORMATION• Name: Address: !3°712t 7-V,16;, (Number & Street) Telephone: Z3 5 cg 97- __? acv (City) (State) (Zip Code) -- Date of Birth: / Z--7�� S.S. #: 000 -00- E -Mail: Driver's License: C - , 1. Type of Certificate of Competency for which application is made. 10. 0 C_ 2. The names and telephone numbers of two persons who will know your whereabouts. 3. Have you ever been convicted of a crime related to Contracting? l)C) (If yes attach extra sheet with explanation) 7. Have, you or any firms you have been associated with ever filed bankruptcy? A O 8. List all debts you or any company(s) associated with you refused or failed to pay and reasons why. 9. List your business or work experience during the past ten years. 10. Statement of any formal training you have had in the area for which the application is made. X0 3 6- 4714/ d Q I.3 °- 3. Have you ever been convicted of a crime related to Contracting? l)C) (If yes attach extra sheet with explanation) 7. Have, you or any firms you have been associated with ever filed bankruptcy? A O 8. List all debts you or any company(s) associated with you refused or failed to pay and reasons why. 9. List your business or work experience during the past ten years. 10. Statement of any formal training you have had in the area for which the application is made. AFFIDAVIT The undersigned hereby makes application for Certificate of Competency under the. provisions of Collier County Ordinance No.. 2006 -46, as amended, and vouches for the truth and accuracy of all sttements and answers herein contained. The undersigned hereby certifies that he is legally qualified to act on behalf of the business organization sought to be licensed in all matters connected with its contracting business and that he has full authority to supervise construction undertaken by himself or such business or organization and that he will continue during this registration to be able to so bind said business organization. The qualified license holder understands that in all contracting matters, he will be held strictly accountable for any and all activities involving his license. Any willful falsification of any information contained herein is grounds for disqualification. APPLICANT (PLEASE PRINT) NAME OF COMPANY SIGNAT RE APPLIC T STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing Instrument as acknowledged before me this (Date) By j who has produced t' i_ .1 (Name of person acknowledging) (Type of identification) as identification and did not take an oath. NOTARY'S SEAL (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) ELNORA E. BRUNER + My COMMISSION # EE 851369 EXPIRES: January 1 2017 Bonded Thru Notary Public underwriters AFFIDAVIT It is understood and acknowledged by the Collier County Contractors' Licensing Board and myself that if I fail to acquire, or maintain at all titres effective Workmen's Compensation Insurance it will result in the possible revocation of my Certificate of Competency. SIGNATU( - APPL1Cgp BUSINESS NAM_ AME ez- VAIL' BEFORE ME this day per sonally. appeared who affirms and says that he has less than one employee and does not require Workmen's Compensation and understands that at any time he employs one or more persons he must obtain said Workmen's Compensation Insurance. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF 1. ; The foregoing instrument was aaknowledged.before me this (Date) -by : _ ` ` - - ' '' who has produced _ (name of person acknowledging) (Type of Ideritlflcatlon) as identification and who did not take an oath. EitM E. BRUNER *; MY COMMISSION # EE 851359 NOTARY SEA �g EXPII mE uary 1, 2017 eorKea wbkc Undenw# m .1 SIGNATURE OF NOTARY NOTARY PUBLIC STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP This certifies that I, 6giPc'u -�— Gl am a member or (APPLICANT'S NAME) Managing member of _ O�.�I 7-,,,v O.A� ,Pvn C5 4-L.r._ (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY NAME) I own c}0 % of the units issued by the Limited Liability Company listed above. Affidavit of Applicant: I certify that the information contained is a true and correct statement to the best of my knowledge. 1.-�ki A-14 (PRINT NAME) LLJAIrj t a COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COWUNTTY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 2800 N. Horsesboe Dr. • Naples. Florida 34104 • 239 -403 -2400 • FAX 239-403-2334 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 29, 2007 TO: Applicant's FROM: Michael Ossorio, Contractor Licensing Supervisor. CC: Robert Dunn, Collier County Building Director. Alamar Finnegan, Collier County Permitting Supervisor. Robert Zachary, County Attorneys Office. All Contractor Licensing personnel. SUBJECT: Collection of social security numbers. Pursuant to Chapter 119, Florida Statues and Collier County Contractor Licensuig Ordinance 2006 -46 Sec. 2.1.1, all applicants are required to submit their social security number (SSN) for the following purposes: a) Assess applicant's ability to satisfy creditors by reviewing their credit history. b) Verification of applicant's test scores and information. Our office will only use your SSN noted above for those reasons pursuant to Chapter 119, Florida Statues and as may otherwise be authorized by law. We are fully committed to safe - guarding and protecting your SSN and once collected, will be maintained as. confidential and exempt under Chapter 119, Florida Statues. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Licensee Information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . ............................................................. Licensee Number Q31807 Name BRIAN J. CLEARY Type Contractor Status Open ---TDate of ExarrvTest Description I Type —T —Property Alert Score received aarrvTest result BUSINESS & LAW ................... ........................ ...................... .......................... View+; Master Proie View All Activities for this Licensee Add a new person or business to Address Book Examination Results Add Exam Result] -ink EAarrvTest Type ---TDate of ExarrvTest cit, Score received aarrvTest result BUSINESS & LAW ................... ........................ ...................... .......................... 03/14/2009 ............................. ...................... BONITA SPRINGS . .................................................. ............................... 1,82.00 ........... a ............ . .......... ...................................... . ........... Charge Exam Fee Sponsoring County Sponsorship Expiration Date Show More Fields ( Hide or. Clear Fields Exam Codel Sponsorship App Date Testing Facility A Detail by Entity Name Detail by Entity Name DNITA BEACH POOLS, L.L.C. lina Information cument Number L07000024152 I /EIN Number 208596026 to Filed 03/05/2007 ite FL itus ACTIVE 13771 TONBRIDGE COURT BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 -3456 13771 TONBRIDGE COURT BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 -3456 ,LEARY, BRIAN J 3771 TONBRIDGE COURT ! ONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 -3456 ame & Address itle MGRM CLEARY, BRIAN J 13771 TONBRIDGE COURT BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 -3456 e MGRM :LEARY, HELEN F 3771 TONBRIDGE COURT ONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 -3456 Report Year Filed Date 2011 04/25/2011 2012 04/11/2012 Page 1 of 2 Detail by Entity Name 2013 03/25/2013 Page 2 of 2 Oi/5 20� 13 -_A REPOfT.iling ew image i Forms Help 04/11/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF for 04/25/2011 —ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF for 03/10/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/28/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08/22/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/05/2007 -- Florida Limited Liability L View image in PDF format Cogyright CO and Privacy Policies State of Florida, Department of State �_.. ._. _. _ �.. L.I I � � ..• _ �• 1. �(' 1. 1\ 1. T\ i 11, ' •. � •�.l 1 1 l i�'"�, "1 /l, �+ Oct 30 13 10:37p 239 - 277 -0167 2392770167 p.1 1� Merit Credit Fast, Accurate & Secure. Phone: 1- 239 - 277 -3202 or 1- 800 - 371 -3348 Fax Cover Sheet: Requested Credit Report Attached! Please call if you have any questions. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and /or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. Oct 30 1310:38p 239 - 277 -0167 Prepared By: Merit Credit 1239) 277 -3202 1800] 371 -3398 TRANS2UNION CREDIT REPORT 2392770167 p.2 =FOP'] [SUB NEE[ [MKT SUB] [INFILE] [DATE] [TIME] t -] Z NP6264423 ERIT CREDIT 14 HV 2/80 10/31/13 1C :45CT [SUBJECT] « °"" [BIRTH DRT�] CLEAR`_', BRIAN J. -8051 1/55 [CURRENT ADDRESS] 63 FANTON HILL RD., WESTCN CT. C6883 [DATE RP—_D] 10/02 [FORMER ADDRESS] 13771 TONBRIDGE CT., BONITA SPRINGS FL. 34135 11102 [CURRENT EMPLOYER AND ADDRESS] [RPTD] SELF EMPLOYED [ FORMER EMPLOYER AND ADDRESS] 3.1/05 BRIAN J CLEARY WES ^OK CT. ------- - - - - -- 8/89 - - -- --------------------------- M 0 D E L P R O F I L E --------------------- ***FICO CLASSIC 04 .SCORE, +679 : 040, D10, 020, 013 -------------- - - - - ___ ___ ___ -, - R E D I T S U M M A R Y * ** _ 0 T A L F I L E H I S T C R PR =O COL - =1 NEG =O HSTNEG =2 -3 TRD=22 RVL=14 INST =1 MTG=7 OPN =O INQ =1 HIGH CRED ,^_RED LIM BALANCE PAST DUE MNTHLY FAY AVAILABLE REVOLVI`:G: $54.7K $60.31< $14.8K $0 $3-10 75% MORTGAGE: $320K $ $313K $0 $2319 TOTALS-------- $374K------ K. $60_3-- $328K $0 $2689 ------------------------- ------------------ C O L L E C T I O N S 3UBNAP!E SUBCODE ECOA OPENED CLOSED $PLACED CREDITOR 1-10P ACCOUNT# VERIFIED BALANCE REMARKS ARS Y 2BQ4002 I 7/11 5830 MEDICAL 09B C00000000000000000 11112A 5830 PLACED FOR COLLECTIC ---------------------------------- ------------------- T R A D E S SURNAME StiBCODE OPENED HIGHCRED TERMS MAXDELQ PAYPAT 1 -12 MOP ACCOUNT# VERFIED CREDLIM PASTDUE AMT -MOP PAYPAT 13 -24 ECOA COLLATRL /-OANTYPE CLSD /PD BALANCE RE14ARKS MO 30/6C!90 CAP ONE B 1DTV001 12/02 $1042 111111111161 R01 479124227210 10/13A $2000 $0 111 = 11111111 I BUSINESS CREDIT C 5/06F $0 48 0/ 0! O AMZX B 21WB001 2/12 $3747 111111111111 R01 CREDIT CARD $0 19 0/ 0; 0 SUNOCO /CITI B 282EO30 9/93 $857 11111111 =111 RO1 CREDIT CARD 12/09C $0 CLOSD BY CRDT GPANTOR 48 0/ 0/ 0 CAP ONE 3 1DTVC01 4/93 $3869 MIN49 1_111_111111 Rol 10 /13A $4925 $0 11111- 111111 Oct 30 13 10:38p 239 - 277 -0167 CREDIT CARD $1532 BK OF AMER B 6331059 10/00 $21.6K MIN184 10 /13A $10.5K SO I CREDIT CA -U' $10.5K CHASE B 26QKOC1 3/97 $12.2K MIN137 1C /13A $10.OK $0 CREDIT CARD $2815 SANTANDER BK B 468SO03 11/05 $320K 92686 =708 9/ =3A C CONVENTIONAL REAL $313K GECRBj'LNT C 235058V 7/03 $840 603632102293 9/13A S100C A CHARGE ACCOUNT 12 /D8C SO REGIONS BANK B 3604047 6/07 $1511K 9003185955 9/12A MO1 C AUTOMOBILE 9/12C $0 AN_EX B 21WBC01 _/06 $40 5/11C $0 KOHLS %CHP_SE D 12EN00: 4101 $511 3198150 101/09A $500 C CHARGE ACCOUNT 9;09C $0 FAIRFLDCTYBK B 7130004 9/C7 $0 1090140106 12/08A $300K C HOME EQUITY LOAN 10 /08C $0 FAIRFiDCTYBC B 7= 30004 _ 1/07 $1.3M 109001 40003666 10 /08A C CONVENTIONAL REAL 10 /08C $0 CEASE B 701N'36 3197 $12.2K 9 /07A $17.9K I CREDIT CARD FAIRFLDCTYBt B 7 =30004 5%05 $0 10901140105 3/07A $290K C HOME EQUITY LOAN 1 /07C $0 FAIRFLDCTYBK B 7130004 71/03 $700K 10900140002824 1 /07A C CONVENTIONAL REAL. 1/07C $0 CHASE B lULY00_ 31'C4 $240K 1560083031864 41 C6A C CONVENTIONAL REAL 4/06C $0 WF /WB B 362N400 10/03 $100K 438654201066 10 /05A $700K C HOME EQUITY LOAN 3/04C $0 2392770167 p.3 48 0/ 0/ 0 11111111111= R02 11111111111_ 48 0/ 0/ 0 Iiiiii_11111 RO1 lillllllllil 4� 1/ C/ 0 36CM2319 111111111111 MO1 $0 111111111:11 CLOSED 48 0/ 0/ C 0 11_111111111 RC1 S0 11_11111111'_ 111111111111 CLOSED 48 0/ 0/ 0 61M 111111111111 I01 00 111111111111 CLOSED 48 0/ 0/ 0 $0 INACTIVE ACCOUNT $0 INACTIVE ACCOUNT 1_1111111111 RO1 11111111111 40 0% 0/ 0 1111_1111111 RO_ 11111111111 48 0/ 0/ 0 11221111_111 COl $0 111 CLOSED 15 2/ 0/ 0 360MB850 111111111111 mol $0 11111111 CLOSED 20 0/ 0/ 0 111111_11111 R01 1111i1i11111 4E 0/ C/ 0 11111_111111 CO1 $C' lllillllllll ACCT CLSD BY CONSUMER 24 0/ 0/ 1111111 CO1 $0 CLOSED 7 Q/ 0/ 0 36014462E 111111111111 m01 $0 111111111111 CLOSED 42 0/ 0/ 0 36OM924 11111111 -111 moo S0 11111111 =1111 CLOSED 24 0/ 0/ 0 11111_111111 CO1 $C' lllillllllll ACCT CLSD BY CONSUMER 24 0/ 0/ Oct 301310:38p 239 - 277 -0167 CHASE B lULYO01 3/04 $1.1M 7/05A C CONVENTIONAL REAL 7/050 $0 SECR.B-,JCP D 235058D 8/98 $316 1C /04A $500 .. CHARGE ACCOUNT 10 /04C $0 2392770167 p.4 36OM4167 11111111111_ MO-1 SO 111 CLOSED 15 0/ 0/ 0 111111_11111 R01 $0 111111_11111 CLOSED DUE TO TRNSFR 39 0/ C/ 0 GM-AC MORT. F 2672002 5/01 $74.OK 360M504 111111111 ll MO1 307197495 4/04A $0 111111111_11 C CONVENTIONAL REAL 4/04C SO CLOSEC 31 OJ 0/ 0 ?AIRFLDCTYEK B 7130004 7/03 S700K. 36OM4692 11 =1111 vlC1 10900140002798 3/04A S0 C CONVENTIONAL REA- 3/34C SO CLOSED 7 0/ G/ 0 --------------------------------------------------------- N Q U I R I E S DATE SUBCODE SUBNAME TYPE AMOUNT 10/31/13 ZNP6284423(FLA) MERIT CREDIT ---------------------------------- -------------- C R E D I T R E P O R T S E R V I C E D B Y TP,ANSUN -ON 800- 888 -4213 2 3ALDW --N PLP.CE, P.O. BOX 100C,CHESTER, PA. 19022 Consumer disclosures can be obtained online through TransUnion at: http: / /www.transurion.coa. --------------------------------------------- CREDITOR CONTACT INFORMAT -ON P.R.S YC2BQ4002 (954) 321 -5957 1801 NW 66TH AVE FORT LAUCERDAL FL. 33313 CAP ONE BClDTV001 (800) 955 -7070 POB 30281 SALT LAKE CITY UT. 84130 AMEX BC21WBOOl (800) 874 -2717 P.O. BOX 981537 EL PASO TX. 79998 SUNOCC /CI ^_I DC'282EO30 (800) 950 -51' PO BOX 6497 SIOUX FALLS SD. 57117 -4 EK OF AMER BC6331059 PO BOX 98223; EL PASO TX. 79998 CHASE EC26QK001 (800) 955 -9900 P.O. 3OX 15298 WILMINGTON DE. 19E50 SANTANDER B{ BY4683003 (800) 333 -7366 1130 BERKSHIRE BV WYOMISSING PA, 19610 GECRB /Lt:T DZ235058V (866) 568 -4464 PC BOX 965005 ORLANDO FL. 32896 REGIONS BANK BI3604047 720 -NORTH 39TH STR BIRMINGHAM AL. 35222 KOHLS /CHASE DC12EN001 (262.) 703 -7000 PO BOX 31_5 MILWAUKEE WI. 53201 FAIRFLDCTYBK BB7130004 (203) 438 -618 150 DANBURY RD RIDGEFIELD CT. 06877 CHASE BC70IN136 BANK ONE CARD SERV ELGIN IL. 60124 CHASE BMIULY00_ (800) 848 -9136 PO BOX 24690" COLUMBUS OH. 43224 WF /WB BC362N400 (336) 747 -8325 PO BOX. 31 =7 PIINSTCN SALEM NC. 27102 Oct 30 1310:38p 239 - 277 -0167 GECRB /JCP PO BOX 965007 GMAC MORT . 3451 HAMMOND AVE DC235058D ORLANDO FL. 32896 FM2672002 WATERLOO IA. 5C704 :ND OF TRANSUNION REPORT 2392770167 p.5 (366) 227 -5213 (800) :66 -4622 MERIT CREDIT HAS RETRIEVED THE ABOVE PERSONAL CREDIT REPORT FOR LICENS --NG PURPOSES AS REQUESTED BY THE BUSINESS CWNER /PROPRIETOR. PUBLIC RECORDS FOR THIS REPORT HAVE BEEN CSECKED AND VERIFIED AT THE COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS. PUBLIC RECORDS HAVE ALSO BEEN VERIFIED FOR PINELLAS COUNTY. PUBLIC RECORDS LEARNED 0 SOURCES OF INFORMATION: TRANS UNION LLC IRS LIEN SECTION COUNTY COURTHOUSE RECORDS IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS REPORT, PLEASE CONTACT MERIT CREDIT AT: 1 -80C- 371 -3348 OR (239) 277 -3202. Oct 301310:38p 239 - 277 -0167 2392770167 Premier Profile - BONITA BCH POOLS, L.L.0 Subcode: 970135 Ordered: 10!31/2013 :0:46:41 CST Transaction Number. 0500168501 Search Inquiry: BONITA BEACH POOLS, L.L.C.r13771 TONBRIDGE CTt`BONITA SP RING /FLr 4135!US!229- 992 - 9628!881827419 Model Description: Intelliscore Plus V2 Experian- A world u.` ;nsight Doing Business As: BONITA BEACH POOLS, LLC website: honitnbe.ar:hnools cprs Primary Address: 13771 TONBRIDGE CT Phone: (239) 992 -9628 BONITA SPGS, FL 34135 -3456 Tax ID: 2C-8596026 l!N This business is the ultimate parent. ' Sge the corgQt�e hierarchy by c1�[►,LgJierq Risk Scores and Credit Limit Recommendation Intelliscore Plus Financial Stability Risk HIGH RISK HIGH RISK Score range: 1 -100 percentile Credit Limi: Recommendation: $1,100 T,'-'-P a Days Beyond Terms Derogatory Legal ' Fraud Alerts Company DST I Original Filings High Risk Alerts Tcp 0 Years on Fite: 6 (FILE ESTABLISHED 04/2007) SIC Code: SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS, NEC - 1799 State of Incorporation: Ft- NA1CS Code: Other Specialty Trace Contractors - 238500 Date of Incorporation: 03!0512007 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction - 236220 Business Type: Institutions - Profit Number of Employees: 1 Contacts: HELEN H CLE.ARY - OFFICER Sales: $91,000 BRIAN J CLEARY - OFFICER Top sy9 Business Alerts Active Business Indicator: Possible OFAC Match: Business 'fctim Statement: Expenan shows this business as active No OFAC match found : No victim statement on We Credit Risk Score: Intelfiseore Plus Current Intelliscore Plus Score: 5 Premier Prnf:I= - BONITA BCH Pnnl s i _t _C Verification Triggers BUSINESS ADDRESS IDENTIFIED AS RESIDENTIAL Risk Class: 5 The risk class groups scores by risk into ranges of similar Oct 301310:38p 239 - 277 -0167 1 ..:_.. Liita i R. _: k��; , -Asia 1 This score precis °s die like:iliood of serious credit delinquencies for it-is business vvithin the next 12 mcntl-s. Payment history and public record along with of ner varables are used to predict future risk. H:gher scores indicate lower risk. 2392770167 p.7 performance. Range 5 is time highest risk, range 1 is the lowest risk. Factors lowering the score Industry Risk Comparison > NUMBER OF ACTIVE COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 4 °/6 of businesses indicate a higher likelihood of severe > BALANCE OF COMMERCIAL .ACCOUNTS AT WORST DELINQUENCY delinquency. BALANCE OF ALL COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS > BALANCE OF DELINQUENT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS Quarterly Score Trends Quarterly Score Trends EI0 GO.- -rrj 50- 48 48 au - 38 30 -)0.. 16 10 - 0 Credit Risk Scone: Financial Stability Risk Current Financial Stability Risk Scare: 2 • I_oau IJ _ ill jLi =.,5 1-100 This score predicts the likelihood of financ ;al stability risk within the next 12 months. f he score uses :radeline and collections information, public filings as well as other variables to predict future risk. Higher scores indicate lower isk. he Quarter:y Score Trends prov'de 3 view of the I:kelfhood of delinquency over the past 12 months for this business. The trends will indicate if the score improved, renained stable. fluctuated or declined over the last "12 mcnths. Risk Class: 5 The risk class groups scores by risk into ranges of similar performance. Range 5 is the highest risk- range 1 is the lovmst risk. Factors lowering the score Industry Fisk Comparison > NU1,iBER OF ACTIVE COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 1 % of businesses indicate a higher likelihood of financial > PAST COF :th9ERCIAL DEROGATORY BALANCE stability risk. > PERCENT OF COKOWERCIAL ACCOUNTS DELINQUENT > PERCENT OF TOTAL COMMERCIAL BALANCE SERIOUSLY DELINQUENT Credit Limit Recommendation Credit Limit Recommendation This recommendation compares this business against similar businesses in the Experian business credit database. It is bases on trade informatio:t, industry, age of business and t -,e I nteiliscore $ ` ' �� Plus, The reco-nmendation is a guidB. The final decision must be made based or; y--Ur company's business policies- TOP Q Oct 30 13 10:39p 239 - 277 -0167 2392770167 p.8 Payment Per✓`omtance Trade and Collection Balance Current DST: 30 Total trade and collection (1): Predicted DST ; N/A All trades (1): Monthly Average DST: 0 Atl collections (0): Highest DST Previous 6 Months: 60 Continuous trade (1): Highest DBT Previous 5 Quarters: 54 6 month average: Payment Trend Indication: Highest credit amount extended: Payment trerd irdi :ator not available Most frequent industry purchasing terms: Industry purchasirg terms not available industry Comparison Industry DBT Range Comparison The current DBT of this business is 60. 9% 0-- busiresses have a DST range of 16 +. DBT for this business: So I DST Ranee 1 -5 6 15 16 +' Trade Line Type Lines Reported DBT Recent High Credit Cortinuous 1 60 S300 New 0 Combined Trade 1 so $300 Additional 0 Total Trade 1 S300 Legal Flings S300 Bankruptcy: $330 Tax Lien filings: a0 Judgment filings: EO Sum of legal filings: S300 UCC filings: N/A Cautionary UCC filings S30o No 0 0 $0 0 No TOP ,0 Balance Current 01 -30 31 -60 61 -90 91+ S300 01'0512007 -25 % 2G% 24 °, /u EO Business Type: Institutions - Profit $300 25% 251/a 26% 24% $0 $300 25% 25% 26% 24% 1cp i Payment Experiences Account Status (Trade Lines with an (') alter the date are newly reported) Days Beyond Terms Business Date Last Payment Recent High Category Reported _ Saie Terms _Credit Balance Cur 1 -30 31 -60 61 -90 gt+ Comments PRNTGBPUBL 10!2013 - — - VARIED -- -5300 S300 - -- 25 °% , - 25 °.n 24 °.G Corporate Registration THE FOLLCfVVING INFORMATION VJAS PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA. State of Origin: FL Date of Incorporation; 01'0512007 Current Status: active Business Type: Institutions - Profit Charter Number: L070000241 Agent: CLEARY BRIAN J Agent Address: 13771 TONBRIDGE CC•URT BONITA SPRIf!GS. FL ;-W 40 TGD 10 Business Name Location The inquired upon business, BONITA BCH POOLS, L.L.C, is the Ultimate Parent BIN BONITA BCH POOL; L.L.0 13771 TONBRIDGE CT - BONITA SF•GS,FL 881$274'.9 P —rier Pmfile - BOMtT A BCH pOnL Oct 301310:40p 239 - 277 -0167 Branches of the inquired upon business: 30NITA BEACH POOLS, L_L_C 2392770167 p.9 12870 TRADE WAY FOUR STE 108 - BONITA SPRINGS,I=L 867dM_,7Rn Tea Q Experian prides itself on the depth and accuracy of the data maintained on our databases. Reporting your customer's payment behavior to Experian mill further strengthen and enhance the power of the information available for making sound credit decisions. Give credit where credit is due. Cal! 1 -800- 520 -1221, option #4 for more information. Enc of report 1 of ' report The hfonnaUo,7 herein is Tarnished in ro-ifidence for your exclusive use for legirimv a ovslmss purposes and shall not be reproduced. Neither _Experian lnfrxmaior Sowtions. lrx., nor their sources or distrtt-ula s warr3nl such ink.mation nor vol they be liable for your use cr re-liance upon ,f. Q Experian M 3_ All rignts reserved. Privacy -A;jisl- Exoe -ian and 'he Experian mars herein are service mars or registered trademarks of F. :perian. Oct 301310:40p 239- 277 -0167 2392770167 p.10 111 Merit Credit Fast, Accurate & Secure. MERIT CREDIT HAS RETRIEVED THE ABOVE BUSINESS REPORT FOR LICENSING PURPOSES AS REQUESTED BY THE BUSINESS OWNER /PROPRIETOR. PUBLIC RECORDS FOR THIS REPORT HAVE BEEN CHECKED AND VERIFIED AT THE COUNTY (INCLUDING PINELLAS), STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS. PUBLIC RECORDS LEARNED: 0 SOURCES OF INFORMATION: ESPERIAN BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES IRS LIEN SECTION COUNTY COURTHOUSE RECORDS IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS REPORT, PLEASE CONTACT MERIT CREDIT AT: 1- 800- 371 -3348 OR 239 - 277 -3202. COMPANY NAME: BONITA BEACH POOLS, L, L.0 FEDERAL ID: 20- 8596026 CURRENT STATUS: ACTIVE PRINCIPAL(S): BRIAN J. CLEARY TITLE: MANAGER HELEN F. CLEARY TITLE: MANAGER DATE INCORPORATED: 03/05/2007 For verification, telephone NSPF at 719.540.9119 or email O 00 -W 0 M x 0 (D Z 0 Mh �ff CD CL T 0 0 13 it 0 13 (D 0 0- CD Mh W- 4o 4 (D 0 O O, 0 —h 0 M 0 Mh �ff CD CL T 0 0 13 it 0 13 (D 0 0- CD Mh W- 4o 4 CATION OF CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENC GMD Operations & Regulatory Management Department Licensing Section 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant's Name: 6- q0A,&. ?' Certificate Category Requested: 10e0L MA -1.4-TA-4 I.—' - Z C1.,444+i1 ;±�N The Applicant is seeking a Collier County Certificate of Competency in the trade indicated above. As part of the application for this certificate the Applicant must verify their experience within this trade. You are being requested to provide information that will aid the Applicant in meeting this requirement. You should verify time of active experience working as an apprentice or a skilled worker (e.g. as a worker commanding the wage of mechanic or better in the trade). Time served solely in a supervisory or administrative role should be described, but may or may not be considered sufficient to demonstrate required trade experience. The person verifying trade experience must provide the following information: Name, Title and license number of the person signing below and verifying Applicants relevantexperience: Name: C Y-- 0.G r ' Title: i' r e 5 i Ln - License Number (if applicable): C- PC- I `^f t 5 -? )5 7 Name of Business: co tJ 5 0.{ Rol c y CL ! ,ip i Repair, .Z-nC Business Address: W Business Phone: o-3�Jci•'y%D 5� The Applicant's years of experience from �" �%�-- to '0� =` °^�� The applicant's scope of work (specific duties) included: Avoe- C 1444,Je 6 S cct .•2 Additional Comments: Falsifying any information provided herein may subject your license to revocation. n �►� n C Signature Print Name: C State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _5 day of by G, I r cl ! r!, who is personally known to me or produced as identification and who did not take an oath. - � t e Signature of Notary 4 ., M, ELNORA E. BRUNER L1' :.: MY COMMISSION # EE 851359 ,r ?• EXPIRES: January 1, 2017 L. of c Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters AFFIDAVIT OF INTEGRITY AND GOOD CHARACTER am a resident of County, (State) and have resided here for more than five (5) years. )uring the last five years I have known �"�'' 4,0 (Applicant). I have had ie opportunity to observe his or her business and personal dealings and find him or her to be a person of onesty, integrity and good character. (Signature) (Name) b.4 Rde A) (Address) Telephone) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 6cEob4-,, ; 3 by (Date) 3r «fin i QCst. to who has produced _ rl.--0-{ • L� c.e o< (name of person acknowledging) (Type of identification) as identification and who did not take an oath. NOTARY'S SEAL r : ELM RA E BRUNER MY COMMISSION A EE 851359 x • o ` EXPIRES: January 1, 2017 '4 0 Bonded Thru Notary P�Yc Unden�rs �� r SIGNATURE OF NOTARY L' (PRINT NAME OF NOTARY) NOTARY. PUBLIC .�g coc#);�' Tax Co for X411 of sole Dear Business Owner: Lee County Tax Collector 2480 Thompson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 www.leetc.com Tel: 239.533.6000 Local Business Tax Account: 0704632 Your 2013 -2014 Lee County Local Business Tax Receipt is attached below. The receipt is non - regulatory and is issued using the information currently on file with our office. It does not signify compliance with zoning, health or other regulatory requirements nor is it an endorsement of work quality. Annual account renewal notices are mailed in August to the address of record at that time; to ensure delivery of your annual notice, mailing addresses may be updated online at www.leetc.com. If there is a change in the business name, ownership, physical location or if the business is being closed, please follow the instructions on the back of this letter to transfer or to close the account. I hope you have a successful year. 4'v� Lee County Tax Collector Vge Coup,, Tax Co %for s41. of flelp Detach and display bottom portion and keep upper portion for your records LEE COUNTY LOCAL BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT 2013-2014 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 0704632 ACCOUNT EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 Location 13771 TONBRIDGE CT BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135 BONITA BEACH POOLS LLC BONITA BEACH POOLS LLC 13771 TONBRIDGE CT BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135 May engage in the POOL CLEANING (CONTRACTOR WORK PROHIBITED) THIS LOCAL BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IS NON REGULATORY THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY PAID 338923 -24 -1 10/30/13 03:45:04 VXK1 $53.00 OP ID: JR ^lilo "#C"_ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE TYPE OF INSURANCE 10 /30/2013I� 10/30/2013 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Rider Insurance Group, Inc. 9180 Estero Pk Commons Blvd #9 Estero, FL 33928 Jennifer J. Rider CONTACT NAME: PA/C NNo Ext : n No): E AAAIL ADDRESS: CUSTOMER ID #: BONIT -1 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: Lloyd's of London NAIC N 13771 INSURED Bonita Beach Pools LLC Bonita To rings, Ct Bonita Springs, FL 34135 INSURER B: Progressive Insurance 10193 INSURER C : $ 1,000,00 A INSURER 0: INSURER E: 09/26/2013 09/26/2014 INSURER F: $ 100,00 MED EXP (Any one person) COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVICInu w IMR11:12• THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF MM/DD POLICY EXP MW/DD LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY =TOO $ 1,000,00 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE ❑X OCCUR CIBFL0006686 09/26/2013 09/26/2014 PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 100,00 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,00 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,00 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,00 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: X POLICY PRO LOC PRODUCTS - COMP /OP AGG $ 2,000,00 $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO 05948566 -3 08/30/2013 08/30/2014 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ 300,00 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS X BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ B SCHEDULED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE (PER ACCIDENT) $ HIRED AUTOS $ NON -OWNED AUTOS $ UMBRELLA LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIAB DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ NIA WC STAT% OTH- TRY IMIT ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $ (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, U more space Is required) COLLIER Contractor's Licensing Board Collier County 2800 Horseshoe Dr Naples, FL 34104 -W-1 6:1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jennifer J. Rider Nleumu / -J 14UUWW1. 1 nP 41k.1 lKY I name anfl innn aro mp mt.r i mo 4— n4 or'nP11 sZ V =0 � 49 Z 4 • TI Sm m Z" sm z nv t O� Ac mm oz ;Oo D> Or $ cm m-< pZ m rn tnN X w -+ m �mow C s c -4 Sao pm E J ` Rudolph's Pool Service Collier County Contractor's Licensing Board 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 To whom it may concern; I come before the Collier County Contractor's Licensing Board to request reinstatement of my Swimming Pool Cleaning contractor's license. My license was suspended for failure to pay the renewal fee for the contractor's license. My business license has been current during this time, and my corporation status is Active with the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. The reason that I failed to pay the renewal fee was due to a lack of funds to pay the initial renewal. I forgot to pay the renewal fee when I had the funds. Due to the fact that I neglected to pay the initial renewal fee, I stopped receiving renewal notices and regret that I did not pay the renewal fee when I paid my business license fee. Going forward I plan to pay the renewal fee at the same time I pay the business license fee. Thank you for your time and response to this letter. Respectfully, Herman Rudolph, President Rudolph's Pool Service, Inc. P. G. aa�R vs v, Naples, FL 34106 239 - 732 -8102 HermanRudolph @aol.com 'ITV TR �o e-r �,.�c�►u�►zty GMD Operations & Regulatory Management Licensing Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104,?, APPLICATION FOR COLLIER COUNTY /CITY OF NAPLES /CITY OF MARCO FIRM INSTRUCTIONS: This application must be typewritten or legibly printed. The application fee must accompany this application. The fee is not refundable after the application has been accepted and entered on the records. All checks should be made payable to the Board of Collier County Commissioners. For further information, consult Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -105, as amended. NAME OF COMPANY: Exact Corporate /Business S Ale, Fiction Nance /DBA: $230.00 ❑ Residential $230.00 ❑ Mechanical $230.00 ❑ ,wimming Pool Qualifier Name: 4"y i)'c oacpw Ui Specialty $205.00 Physical Address: 5,01'3 444kbe 6,&ZC';�Z A.0GIS , �'L 3 *114 (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip Code) Mailing Address: !�- . O. BDK 13'70 /U�i�Oi.ES , �L 3 104 (Number & Street) (City) '-� (State) (Zip Code) Telephone: ,239 -132 -8102 TYPE OF LICENSE: ❑ General $230.00 ❑ Building $230.00 ❑ Residential $230.00 ❑ Mechanical $230.00 ❑ Roofing $230.00 Specialty trader .<`.__: CHANGE OF STATUS: Reinstatement ( ) From One Business to Another Page 1 of 4 Ll Electrician $230.00 ❑ Plumber $230.00 ❑ Air Cond. $230.00 ❑ ,wimming Pool $230.00 Ui Specialty $205.00 RENSTATEMENT FEE $205.00 2 BACK YEARS FEES 11/12 &12/13 $370.00 RENEWAL W/ LATE FEE 13/140 & Nov $145.00 TOTAL = $740.00 1. The names, titles, home address and phone numbers of all Officers /Managing Members of the Fi 2. List all businesses, firms, entities or contracting businesses you have been associated with during the last ten years (ex. Held a license for or been a partner). Attach extra pages if needed. %. 3. List all debts you or any company(s) associated with you refused to pay and the reasons for the refusal to pay. Attach extra pages if needed. A/oAJ,t-- AFFIDAVIT I, A454 � UyoL,D6( certify that the foregoing is true a correct to the best of my knowledge. yr Authorized Oft6er of a Firm STATE OF FLORIDA /'� COUNTY OF Jlr The foregoing instrument as acknowledged before me this N /J- C) d 3 Ely 4ff In011 of s: 760 (Name of officer, title /agent) V v (Name of Corporation) a 6 �` `, Corporation on behalf f h rp o the corporation. (State or Place of Corporation) He /She has produced "b- identification and did not take an oath. (Type of identification) NOT r ° °aii;.; JANET L. KUNE • a Notary Public -State of Florida My Comm. Expires Jul 23, 2014 Commission # DD 977542 NATURE OF N TARY) Page 2 of 4 QUALIFIER INFORMATION: Name: �HEi�iy.¢i✓ t5f"uDd� O� Address: 309,3 AYAgt, = 6 &,z- #20Z (Number & Street) Telephone: Z J= 73Z -8 10 Z S.S. #: 000 -00 -_ 09-75- Driver's License:�� /- X20 -'f9- 2(05"- p (City) ' (State) (Zip Code) Date of Birth: 07125114iq E -Mail: r�u�o�PK'oocS @COI • &,oq 1. Type of Certificate of Competency for which application is made. /OtJG 6_4545 W IlljG 2. The names and telephone numbers of two persons who will know your whereabouts. 4_"'2,4kOL 502- 608--RI04 _ W&D"4011 773 -3o 1-- 103o 3. Have you ever been convicted of a crime related to Contracting? A10 (If yes attach extra sheet with explanation) 7. Have you or any firms you have been associated with ever filed bankruptcy? NO 8. List all debts you or any company(s) associated with you refused or failed to pay and reasons why. /tDnl6_ 9. List your business or work experience during the past ten years. ;2aoRTS f/ffiQS �7RouP. �i✓e .- I� ,PE�i1.L�UT,e/Aar.Oe�/Se[.2YcE �it1C �i2E�/ A-�vr 10. Statement of any formal training you have had in the area fur which the application is made. CA0 CW iiFr44T�oA/ Page 3 of 4 Licensee Information Licensee Number Name Type Status Q31799 JHERMAN RUDOLPH Contractor Open t_..J E Score received Exam Test result Description Type Pr Alert 04/27/2009 ... .............:-.................................... . .......... 's FT. LAUDERDALE (GITS) _.............................................................. .... ...................... View Master Proiect View All Activities for this Licensee Add a new ep rson or business to Address Book Examination Results Add Exam Result Link Exa=Test Type Date of ExanVTest City Score received Exam Test result BUSINESS PROCEDURES ..:.............................................. ................ ................ ............. 04/27/2009 ... .............:-.................................... . .......... 's FT. LAUDERDALE (GITS) _.............................................................. .... ...................... 76.00 ._ .................................. ........ .... .... ....................................................... Charge Exam Fee Sponsoring County Sponsorship Expiration Date Show More Fields Hide or Clear Fields Exam Code Sponsorship App Date Testing Facility A A AFFIDAVIT The undersigned hereby makes application for Certificate of Competency under the provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 2006 -46, as amended, and vouches for the truth and accuracy of all statements and answers herein contained. The undersigned hereby certifies that he will act only for himself or that he is legally qualified to act on behalf of the business organization sought to be certified in all matters connected with its contracting business and that he has full authority to supervise construction undertaken by himself or such business or organization and that he will continue during this registration to be able to so bind said business organization. The qualifier license holder understands that in all contracting matters, he will be held strictly accountable for any and all activities involving his license. Any willful falsification on any information contained herein is grounds for disqualification. _ "Al WUD01 -AW APPLICANT (Please Print) NAME OF COMPANY SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this `` (Date) by �� Ol who has produced --%�� (name of person acknowled ing) (Type of identification) as identification and who did not take an oath. NOTARY'S SEAL JANET L. KLINE Notary Public - Stale of Florida My Comm. Expires Jul 23. 2014 Commission # DD 977542 SIGNAPJRE OF NOTARY int4 k1' I (PRINT NAME OF NOTARY PUBLIC) NOTARY PUBLIC AFFIDAVIT IT IS understood and acknowledged by the Collier County Contractors' Licensing Board and myself that if I fail to acquire, or maintain at all times effective Workmen's Compensation Insurance it will result in the possible revocation of my Certificate of Competency. SII- G�NATURE O-F—APPLICANT BUSINESS NAME /.0--• I r } DATE BEFORE ME this day personally appeared.... 1,� a, &,,/V, ew�hoaffirms and says that he has less than one employee and does not require Workmen's Compensation understands that at any time he employees one or more persons he must. obtain said Workmen's Compensation Insurance. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument, was acknowledged before me this b f� f-t'� FLA�t rl (Date) y who has produced�� (name of person acknowle ging) (Type of identification) as identification and who did not take an oath. T' JANET L. KLINE Notary Public - State of Florida •� f'I,,,,,` ct- My Comm. Expires Jul 23, 2014 •;,�F,d; Commission # DD 977542 ()�-- . SIG TUBE OF NOTARY (PRINT NAME OF NOTARY PUBLIC) NOTARY PUBLIC 4 a AFFIDAVIT OF INTEGRITY AND GOOD CHARACTER am a resident of County, (State) and have resided here for more than five (5) years. During the last five years I have known 6 46et AI✓ — iUDoc.Al applicant). I have had the opportunity to observe his or her business and personal dealings and find him or her to be a person of honesty, integrity and good character. (Signature) K, (Name) iC- ' '` Z`t:Lk 11,-6 . (Address) A i \\\�% Telephone �)-3c t� ' 1.5 � S STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoin instrument was acknowledged before me this a 0 % by ' � (Dote) �/' who has produced US . cu' (name of person acknowledging) (Type of identification) as identification and who did not take an oath. NOTARY'S SEAL ;ter °tPav PG «�� - - - - - - - - - JANET L. KLINE s Notary Public - State of Florida N„�11„ o�c My Comm. Expires Jul 23, 2014 �y,FOFF�°�� Commission # DD 977542 (;;W� /. 1 SItOATURE OF NOTARY j f (PRINT NAME OF NOTARY) NOTARY PUBLIC 9 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 2500 N. Horseshoe Dr. • Naples, Florida 34104 • 239403 -2400 • FAX 239-403-2334 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 29, 2007 TO: Applicant's FROM: Michael Ossorio, Contractor Licensing Supervisor. CC: Robert Dunn, Collier County Building Director. Alamar Finnegan, Collier County Permitting Supervisor. Robert Zachary, County Attorneys Office. All Contractor Licensing personnel. >UBJECT: Collection of social security numbers. pwsuant: to Chapter 119, Florida Statues and Collier County Contractor Licensing Ordinance 2006 -46 Sec. I.1, all applicants are required to submit their social security number (SSN) for the following purposes: a) Assess applicant's ability to satisfy creditors by reviewing their credit history. b) Verification of applicant's test scores and information. )ur office will only use your SW noted above for those reasons pursuant to Chapter 119, Florida Statues nd as may otherwise be authorized by law. Ve are fully committed to sate - guarding and Pmtecting your SSN and ones collcetcd, will be rnahmined as onfidential and exempt under Chapter 119, Florida Statues. Premier Profile - RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICES, INC Subcode: 970135 Ordered: 09/06/2013 11:31:53 CST Transaction Number: C500092947 Search Inquiry: RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICES, INC/3093 AVIAMAR CIR APT 202/NAPLES/FL/34114/US/239-732-8102/898432638 Model Description: Intelliscore Plus V2 Doing Business As: RUDOLPHS POOL SERVICE INC Primary Address: 3093 AVIAMAR CIR APT 202 NAPLES, FL 34114 -9644 Risk Scores and Credit Limit Recommendation Intelliscore Plus Financial Stability Risk MEDIUM MEDIUM -HIGH 38 RISK RISK Score range: 1 -100 percentile Credit Limit Recommendation: $1,300 Phone: (239) 732 -8102 Tax ID: 26- 3762588 Days Beyond Terms Company DBT DBT Unavailable Derogatory Legal Original Filings •� =� Experian- A world of insight TOP 0 Fraud Alerts High Risk Alerts TOP 0 Years on File: 4 (FILE ESTABLISHED 01/2009) SIC Code: SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS, NEC - 1799 State of Incorporation: FL BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC - 7389 Date of Incorporation: 11/26/2008 CONSTRUCTION, SINGLE - FAMILY HOUSES - 1521 Business Type: Institutions - Profit NAICS Code: Contacts: HERMAN R RUDOLPH - PRESIDENT Commercial and Institutional Building Construction - 236220 CHRISTOPHER RUDOLPH - VICE PRESIDENT All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services - 541990 CAROL B RUDOLPH - DIRECTOR Residential Building Construction - 236110 Number of Employees: 2 Sales: $248,000 Business Alerts Active Business Indicator: Experian shows this business as active Possible OFAC Match: • No OFAC match found Business Victim Statement: • No victim statement on file TOP 0 Verification Triggers The primary Business Name, Address, and Phone Number on Experian File were reviewed for High Risk indicators, no High Risk indicators were found. Premier Profile - RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICES. INC 1/3 Current Intelliscore Plus Score: 38 Risk Class: 3 38 iWEDIUM RISK High Love The risk class groups scores by risk into ranges of similar Risk Risk j performance. Range 5 is the highest risk, range 1 is the i ! lowest risk. U to -5 50 ?5 100 This score predicts the likelihood of serious credit delinquencies for this business within the next 12 months. Payment history and public record along with other variables are used to predict future risk. Higher scores indicate lower risk. Factors lowering the score Industry Risk Comparison > RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY'S INDUSTRY 37% of businesses indicate a higher likelihood of severe delinquency. > BALANCE OF AGED COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS THAT ARE CURRENT > LOW NBR OF COMMERCIAL ACCTS RPTD WITHIN THE LAST 12 MOS Quarterly Score Trends Quarterly Score Trends The Quarterly Score Trends provide a view of the likelihood of delinquency over the past 12 months for this business. The trends will indicate if the score improved, remained stable, fluctuated or declined over the last 12 months. SEF-�QJ OrCG F Ed ��-t`AP'y 3��-P�yG Credit Risk Score: Financial Stability Risk Current Financial Stability Risk Score: 10 Risk Class: 4 10 t High - Low The risk class groups scores by risk into ranges of similar Risk 3 Risk performance. Range 5 is the highest risk, range 1 is the 0 3 10 30 65 100 lowest risk. Fhis score predicts the likelihood of financial stability risk within the next 12 months. Fhe score uses tradeline and collections information, public filings as well as other iariables to predict future risk. Higher scores indicate lower risk. = actors lowering the score Industry Risk Comparison NUMBER OF ACTIVE COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 9% of businesses indicate a higher likelihood of financial RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY'S INDUSTRY SECTOR stability risk. RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS TYPE EMPLOYEE SIZE OF BUSINESS This recommendation compares this business against similar businesses in the Experian business credit database. It is based on trade information, industry, age of business and the Intelliscore Plus. The recommendation is a guide. The final decision must be made based on your company's business policies. Premier Profile - RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICES, INC 2/3 e Payment Performance Current DBT: Not Available Predicted DBT: N/A Monthly Average DBT: 0 Highest DBT Previous 6 Months: 0 Highest DBT Previous 5 Quarters: 0 Payment Trend Indication: Payment trend indicator not available Trade and Collection Balance Legal Filings Total trade and collection (1): $0 Bankruptcy: All trades (1): $0 Tax Lien filings: Judgment filings: All collections (0): $0 Sum of legal filings: Continuous trade (0): $0 UCC filings: 6 month average: N/A Cautionary UCC filings: Highest credit amount extended: N/A Most frequent industry purchasing terms: Industry purchasing terms not available Industry Comparison Industry DBT Range Comparison The current DBT of this business is Not Available. DBT for this business: Not Available DBT Range 0 -5 6 -15 16+ TOP a No 0 0 $0 0 No TOP O Trade Payment - Additional Trade Details Payment Experiences Account Status (Trade Lines with an ( *) after the date are newly reported) Days Beyond Terms Business Date Last Payment Recent High Category Reported Sale Terms Credit Balance Cur 1 -30 31 -60 61 -90 91+ Comments PRNTG &PUBL 10/2012 VARIED <$100 $0 Corporate Registration THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA. State of Origin: FL Date of Incorporation: 11,26/2008 Current Status: Active Business Type: Institutions - Profit Charter Number: P080001046 Agent: RUDOLPH HERMAN Agent Address: 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE NAPLES, FL TOP 0 TOP a Experian prides itself on the depth and accuracy of the data maintained on our databases. Reporting your customer's payment behavior to Experian will further strengthen and enhance the power of the information available for making sound credit decisions. Give credit where credit is due. Call 1- 800 - 520 -1221, option #4 for more information. End of report 1 of 1 report The information herein is furnished in confidence for your exclusive use for legitimate business purposes and shall not be reproduced. Neither Experian Information Solutions, Inc., nor their sources or distributors warrant such information nor shall they be liable for your use or reliance upon it. © Experian 2013. All rights reserved. Privacy policy. Experian and the Experian marks herein are service marks or registered trademarks of Experian. Premier Profile - RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICES, INC 3/3 7 Merit Credit Fast, Accurate & Secure. MERIT CREDIT HAS RETRIEVED THE ABOVE BUSINESS REPORT FOR LICENSING PURPOSES AS REQUESTED BY THE BUSINESS OWNER /PROPRIETOR. PUBLIC RECORDS FOR THIS REPORT HAVE BEEN CHECKED AND VERIFIED AT THE COUNTY (INCLUDING PINELLAS), STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS. PUBLIC RECORDS LEARNED: 0 SOURCES OF INFORMATION: EXPERIAN BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES IRS LIEN SECTION COUNTY COURTHOUSE RECORDS IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS REPORT, PLEASE CONTACT MERIT CREDIT AT: 1- 800- 371 -3348 OR 239 - 277 -3202. COMPANY NAME: RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICES, INC FEDERALID:263762588 CURRENT STATUS: ACTIVE PRINCIPAL(S): HERMAN RUDOLPH CRISTOPHER RUDOLPH CAROL RUDOLPH DATE INCORPORATED: 11/26/2008 TITLE: PRESIDENT TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT TITLE: DIRECTOR Prepared By: Merit Credit (239) 277 -3202 (800) 371 -3348 TRANSUNION CREDIT REPORT [FOR] [SUB NAME] [MKT SUB] [INFILE] [DATE] [TIME] (I) Z NP6284423 MERIT CREDIT 16 NP 5/75 09/06/13 11:34CT [SUBJECT) [SSN] [BIRTH DATE] RUDOLPH, HERMAN R. -0875 7/49 [CURRENT ADDRESS] [DATE RPTD] 3093 AVIAMAR CI., #202. NAPLES FL. 34114 7/07 [FORMER ADDRESS] 10913 OLD HARRODS WOODS CI., LOUISVILLE KY. 40223 5/99 14214 TROON DR., #14C. LOUISVILLE KY. 40245 [CURRENT EMPLOYER AND ADDRESS] [VERF] [RPTD] RUDOLPH POOL SERVICE 7/13 6/13 [FORMER EMPLOYER AND ADDRESS] SPORTS BARS GROUP 7/04 M O D E L P R O F I L E * * * A L E R T * ** * * *FICO CLASSIC 04 ALERT: SCORE +696 : 040, 010, 008 * ** IN ADDITION TO THE ** *FACTORS LISTED ABOVE, THE NUMBER OF INQUIRIES ON THE CONSUMER'S CREDIT ** *FILE HAS ADVERSELY AFFECTED THE CREDIT SCORE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- C R E D I T S U M M A R Y * ** T O T A L F I L E H I S T O R Y PR =1 COL =2 NEG =O HSTNEG =O TRD =18 RVL =10 INST =5 MTG =3 OPN =O INQ =5 HIGH CRED CRED LIM BALANCE PAST DUE MTHLY PAY AVAILABLE REVOLVING: $177K $168K $159K $0 $844 5$ INSTALLMENT: $24.1K $ $17.2K $0 $493 MORTGAGE: $214K $ $ $ TOTALS: $415K $168K $176K $0 $1337 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- P U B L I C R E C O R D S SOURCE DATE LIAB ECOA COURT ASSETS PAID DOCKET# TYPE PLAINTIFF /ATTORNEY Z 4892594 4/08R $4653 I RD 12/08 04041503001 RELEASE OF TAX LIEN B1003P546 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- C O L L E C T I O N S SUBNAME SUBCODE ECOA OPENED CLOSED $PLACED CREDITOR MOP ACCOUNT# VERIFIED BALANCE REMARKS GULF CST COL Y 1X5L001 I 12/08 $267 MEDICAL O9B 3593901 8/13A $267 PLACED FOR COLLECTIO MED DATA SYS Y 204K004 I 8/09 $446 MEDICAL O9B 11574977 2 /10A $446 PLACED FOR COLLECTIO ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- T R A D E S SUBNAME SUBCODE OPENED HIGHCRED TERMS MAXDELQ PAYPAT 1 -12 MOP ACCOUNT# VERFIED CREDLIM PASTDUE AMT -MOP PAYPAT 13 -24 ECOA COLLATRL /LOANTYPE CLSD /PD BALANCE REMARKS MO 30/60/90 ALLY FINCL F 259237L 10 /11 $18.6K 60M310 111111111111 I01 29917552824 9/13A I AUTOMOBILE $11.7K 5TH 3RD BK B 9302020 12/08 $137K 87047 8/13A $138K C HOME EQUITY LOAN $138K AMEX B 21WB00l 5/12 $4538 8/13A $10.OK A CREDIT CARD $2012 CITI B 64DB002 10/88 $5973 8/13A $2000 I CREDIT CARD $1658 DISCOVER FIN B 9616003 6/06 $6030 8/13A $6000 I CREDIT CARD $5513 5/3 BANK CC B 21AV061 6/01 $4685 8/13A $4400 C CREDIT CARD 2/07C $0 CHASE B 26QK001 11/03 $13.8K 8/13A $10.OK I FLEXIBLE SPENDING $3691 BK OF AMER B 1597029 2/11 $8361 1930 8/13A I FLEXIBLE SPENDING $7964 WELLS FARGO B 908N714 6/13 $5509 7/13A I AUTOMOBILE $5416 CB /PIER1 H 1NZ8183 4/12 $1005 7/13V $1000 I PFROM CHASE BANK 8 /12P $0 CB /NY &CO C 1NZ8074 12/08 $0 57738 7/13V $500 I CHARGE ACCOUNT 12/08P $0 FRD MOTOR CR F 3796761 10 /10 $12.3K 45977173 6/13A I AUTOMOBILE 6/13C $0 FIFTH THIRD B 992SO02 6/07 $410K 403889272 7 /10A C FRD452684757 7/10C $0 FRD MOTOR CR F 3796761 1/04 $33.5K 36327149 5/09A I AUTOMOBILE 5/09C $0 FIFTH THIRD B 9925002 6/07 $213K 403887201 9/08A $0 1111111111 I01 22 0/ 0/ 0 MIN362 iillliliilll C01 $0 111111111111 0 48 0/ 0/ 0 111111111111 111111111111 R01 $0 111 15 0/ 0/ 0 MIN35 111111111111 RO1 $0 111111111111 RO1 48 0/ 0/ 0 MIN139 111111111111 R01 $0 111111111111 0 48 0/ 0/ 0 111111111111 111111111111 RO1 $0 111111111111 ACCT CLSD BY CONSUMER 48 0/ 0/ 0 MIN112 111111111111 RO1 $0 111111111111 MO1 48 0/ 0/ 0 MIN196 111111111111 RO1 $0 111111111111 0 30 0/ 0/ 0 36M183 1 I01 $0 1 0/ 0/ 0 111111111111 RO1 $0 111 15 0/ 0/ 0 111111111111 RO1 $0 11111111111 48 0/ 0/ 0 48M342 111111111111 I01 $0 111111111111 CLOSED 32 0/ 0/ 0 360M1867 111111111111 MO1 $0 111111111111 CLOSED 37 0/ 0/ 0 64M558 111111111111 I01 $0 111111111111 CLOSED 31 0/ 0/ 0 360M1299 111111111111 MO1 $0 111 C FRD452684870 9/08C $0 CLOSED PNC MORTGAGE B 8958084 4338675115 P CONVENTIONAL REAL HNB LEASING B 814D089 10000131178 I AUTO LEASE 1/98 $214K 4/05A 8/00 $18.1K 9/04A 9/04C $0 360M581 15 0/ 0/ 0 XXIXXIXX1X11 M01 111X11111111 48 0/ 0/ 0 48M 111111111111 I01 $0 111111111111 ACCT CLSD BY CONSUMER 32 0/ 0/ 0 5TH 3RD KY B 1HQB003 6/01 $2018 RUR 544400140009 7/13V $1900 $0 P CREDIT CARD 5/06C $0 CRDT CARD LOST /STOLEN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I N Q U I R I E S DATE SUBCODE SUBNAME TYPE AMOUNT 9/06/13 ZNP6284423(FLA) MERIT CREDIT 8/05/13 ZNV0005624(EAS) SAFERENT 8/02/13 ZCH5636533(CHI) SCRNG RPTS 7/20/13 ZCH4435073(CHI) NTN- CHICAGO 4/18/12 BPH4188229(EAS) BK OF AMER ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- C R E D I T R E P O R T S E R V I C E D B Y TRANSUNION 800 - 888 -4213 2 BALDWIN PLACE P.O. BOX 1000,CHESTER, PA. 19022 Consumer disclosures can be obtained online through TransUnion at: http: / /www.transunion.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CREDITOR CONTACT INFORMATION JEFCNTCRT Z 4892594 (502) 574 -5700 531 COURT PLACE LOUISVILLE KY. 40202 GULF CST COL YC1X5L001 (877) 827 -4820 5630 MARQUESAS CIR SARASOTA FL. 34233 MED DATA SYS YC204K004 (800) 453 -3418 1374 S BABCOCK ST MELBOURNE FL. 32901 ALLY FINCL FA259237L (888) 925 -2559 P.O. BOX 380901 BLOOMINGTON MN. 55438 5TH 3RD BK BI9302020 (800) 972 -3030 5050 KINGSLEY DR CINCINATTI OH. 45263 AMEX BC21WB00l (800) 874 -2717 P.O. BOX 981537 EL PASO TX. 79998 CITI BC64DB002 POB 6241 SIOUX FALLS SD. 57117 DISCOVER FIN BC9616003 POB 15316 WILMINGTON DE. 19850 5/3 BANK CC BC21AV061 (800) 972 -3030 5050 KINGSLEY DR CINCINATTI OH. 45263 CHASE BC26QK001 (800) 955 -9900 P.O. BOX 15298 WILMINGTON DE. 19850 BK OF AMER BC1597029 PO BOX 982235 EL PASO TX. 79998 WELLS FARGO BA908N714 MAC 4031 -080 PHOENIX AZ. 85038 CB /PIER1 HFINZ8183 PO BOX 182789 COLUMBUS OH. 43219 CB /NY &CO CWlNZ8074 PO BOX 182789 COLUMBUS OH. 43218 FRD MOTOR CR FA3796761 (800) 727 -7000 POB 542000 OMAHA NE. 68154 FIFTH THIRD BM992S002 (513) 358 -4801 5050 KINGSLEY DR CINCINATTI OH. 45263 PNC MORTGAGE BM8958084 (800) 822 -5626 3232 NEWARK DR MIAMISBURG OH. 45342 HNB LEASING BZ814D089 7450 HUNTINGTON PA COLUMBUS OH. 43235 5TH 3RD KY B01HQB003 (502) 562 -5353 5050 KINGSLEY DR CINCINATTI OH. 45263 SAFERENT Z 0005624 (800) 999 -0350 7300 WESTMORE RD ROCKVILLE MD. 20850 SCRNG RPTS Z 5636533 (866) 389 -4042 220 GERRY DR WOOD DALE IL. 60191 NTN- CHICAGO Z 4435073 (630) 889 -6030 2 E 22ND ST, SUITE LOMBARD IL. 60148 BK OF AMER B 4188229 (800) 421 -2110 PO BOX 982238 EL PASO TX. 79998 END OF TRANSUNION REPORT MERIT CREDIT HAS RETRIEVED THE ABOVE PERSONAL CREDIT REPORT FOR LICENSING PURPOSES AS REQUESTED BY THE BUSINESS OWNER /PROPRIETOR. PUBLIC RECORDS FOR THIS REPORT HAVE BEEN CHECKED AND VERIFIED AT THE COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS. PUBLIC RECORDS HAVE ALSO BEEN VERIFIED FOR PINELLAS COUNTY. PUBLIC RECORDS LEARNED SOURCES OF INFORMATION: TRANS UNION LLC IRS LIEN SECTION COUNTY COURTHOUSE RECORDS IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS REPORT, PLEASE CONTACT MERIT CREDIT AT: 1- 800 - 371 -3348 OR (239) 277 -3202. Detail by Entity Name Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICES, INC Filing Information Document Number FEI /EIN Number Date Filed State Status Principal Address 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34114 Mailing Address 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34114 P08000104673 263762588 11/26/2008 FL ACTIVE Registered Agent Name & Address RUDOLPH, HERMAN 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34113 Officer /Director Detail Name & Address Title P RUDOLPH, HERMAN 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34114 Title V RUDOLPH, CHRISTOPHER 4604 CHIPPENDALE NAPLES, FL 34112 Title D RUDOLPH, CAROL Page 1 of 2 http:/ /search. sunbiz. org/ lnquiry/ CorporationSearch ISearchResultDetai llEntityNwne /domp -p... 10/09/13 Detail by Entity Name 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE #202 NAPLES, FL 34114 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2011 03/16/2011 2012 02/03/2012 2013 03/24/2013 Document Images Page 2 of 2 03/24/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/16/2011 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/14/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/08/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/26/2008 -- Domestic Profit View image in PDF format Cooyricht 2> and Privacy Policies State of Florida, Department of State http: / /search.sunbiz.org/ Inquiry/ CorporationSearch/ SearchResultDetaiUEntityName /domp -p... 10/09/1-31 I I I 1 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION In compliance with Chapter 607 and/or Chapter 621, F.S. (profit) ARTICLE I NAME The name of the corporation shall be: Rudolph's Pool Service, Inc. ARTICLE H PRINCIPAL Ol�'FICE The principal street address and mailing address, if different is: 3093 Aviamar Circle #202, Naples, FL 34114 ARTICLE III PURPOW The purpose for which the corporation is organized is: To maintain, service and repair residential and commercial pools. ARTICLE IV SIIARLS The nnmher cif shares of stcxk is- 100 AR71CLE V LAMAL OFFIC&RS AIW/CkR DIIZCTORS List name(s). address(es) and specific title(s): Herman Rudolph, President, 3093 Aviamar Circle #202, Naples FL 34114 CHristopher Rudolph, Vice President, 6115 Wedge Ct., Naples, FL 34113 Carol Rudolph, Director, 3093 Aviamar Circle #202, Naples, FL 34114 AR27CLE VI REGl IMCD AGENT The name and Florida street der (P.O. Box NOT acceptable) of the registered agent is: Herman Rudolph, 3093 Aviamar Circle #202, Naples, FL 34114 ARTICLE VII INCORPORATOR The name and addreac of the TncnnwwVor is: Herman Rudolph, 3093 Aviamar Circle #202, Naples, FL 34114 Having been named as registeved amt to accept s&Ww of prve ew for dw above stated corparad m at the prone designated in this I ymfami for xrth and accept the appioarhmad as registered agent a F#d agree to act in this capacity 11/6/2008 //// Sig�n'aibilURegstered Agent Date ,f�ieA4 -4-1 de-,A A1 11/612008 y'p N r✓'7 r° L � AR27CLE VI REGl IMCD AGENT The name and Florida street der (P.O. Box NOT acceptable) of the registered agent is: Herman Rudolph, 3093 Aviamar Circle #202, Naples, FL 34114 ARTICLE VII INCORPORATOR The name and addreac of the TncnnwwVor is: Herman Rudolph, 3093 Aviamar Circle #202, Naples, FL 34114 Having been named as registeved amt to accept s&Ww of prve ew for dw above stated corparad m at the prone designated in this I ymfami for xrth and accept the appioarhmad as registered agent a F#d agree to act in this capacity 11/6/2008 //// Sig�n'aibilURegstered Agent Date ,f�ieA4 -4-1 de-,A A1 11/612008 O O o o Ol O o t3 t3� Qa o 4.4 00 CIJ Lo� 44 U O Applicant's Name: CATION OF CONSTRUCTION EXPERIEN GMD Operations & Regulatory Management Department Licensing Section 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 W Certificate Category Requested: % <J,uti�c fG�t�i7L� /,ti�(a The Applicant is seeking a Collier County Certificate of Competency in the trade indicated above. As part of the application for this certificate the Applicant must verify their experience within this trade. You are being requested to provide information that will aid the Applicant in meeting this requirement. You should verify time of active experience working as an apprentice or a skilled worker (e.g. as a worker commanding the wage of mechanic or better in the trade). Time served solely in a supervisory or administrative role should be described, but may or may not be considered sufficient to demonstrate required trade experience. The person verifying trade experience must provide the following information: Name, Title and license number of the person signing below and verifying Applicants relevantexperience: Name: ,% 5 0-7 C-. - . Y�1 Title: CN C.c./ r License Number (if applicable): _2 S w 3 Name of Business: r�99 Q(��s' �' l�? �� Business Address: / �� Z �t k e- ZC41_ �` —�— Business Phone: r 9 The Applicant's years of experience from o� 6 c to 2. a 3 J - 15 1 The applicant's scope of work (specific duties) included: --- -a Additional Comments: Falsifying any information provided herein may subject your license to revocati i ature rint Name: 1 s 6L7 • 4 A- a� State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged bef% ptlidelh & ay of o C by `Or�o me or produced�.�oz as identification and who did not take an oWW .�Q,•.�M`SSIONF�•.y i •VO per 16 A� • • *i �0 9 y •: #FF 030924 0� ; o, ova 90ndedOt O 0�4 i.�:eUC!Sf .& O'k :\ Signature of Notary a G� (jArJ04 �4t 4 "t7 •� o -+••r U � O 'Q O a U o U 9 '•a tw H U V) z o 00 ~ ~ d � � Q 00 N M ONO O V) O 'Q O a U o U 9 '•a tw H U V) z RUDOPOO -01 CGRADY .4CORU CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE °ATE � 10114/2013 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: if the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pol)cy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WANED, subject to the terns and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER All Insurance Underwriters Inc. 2600 Sumerian Drive Suite 101 Land Land O Lakes, FL 34638 CONTACT NAME: PHONE 813) 343 -3100 W. No : (813 343 -3090 ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL 8 INSURER A: Federated National Insurance Company EACH OCCURRENCE $ 100, INSURED INSURERS: MED EXP (Arty one person) INSURER C: PERSONAL & ADV INJURY RUDOLPHS POOL SERVICE, INC INSURER D: 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE #202 Naples, FL 34114 INSURER E: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG INSURER F Fire Dmg (aryl) $ 100, COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. am LTR TYPE INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER M Y LAY LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR GL -0000018919 -00 10/1112013 10/11/2014 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 100, PREMISES Ea occurre m $ MED EXP (Arty one person) $ 5,00 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY S 100, GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 200, GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: I-XI POLICY r 'O- LoC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ Includec Fire Dmg (aryl) $ 100, AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS HIREDAUTOS AUTOS N WNED COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT a accident $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Peracadent) $ PR Per eccidarrt $ UMBRELLA LIAR EXCESS LIAB OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ DED I I RETENTION $ $ W MERSCOMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUTNE OFFICERMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below MIA WCSTATU OTH- E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT I $ DESCRIP11 'N OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedrde, it more space is requhed) Collier County Contractor Licensing Board 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34101 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2010105) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 06-11 -2009 ALEX SINK STATE OF FLORIDA CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION * * CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM FLORIDA WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW * * NON - CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EXEMPTION This certifies that the individual listed below has elected to be exempt from Florida Workers' Compensation law. EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/11/2009 PERSON: RUDOLPH FEIN: 263762588 BUSINESS NAME AND ADDRESS: RUDOLPH'S POOL SERVICE INC 3093 AVIAMAR CIRCLE #202 NAPLES FL 34114 SCOPES OF BUSINESS OR TRADE: 1- POOL MAINTENANCE EXPIRATION DATE: N/A HERMAN IMPORTANT: Pursuant to Chapter 440 . 05(14), F.S., an officer of a corporation who elects exemption from this chapter by filing a certificate of election under this section may not recover benefits or compensation under this chapter. Pursuant to Chapter 440.05(12), F.S., Certificates of election to be exempt... apply only within the scope of the business or trade listed on the notice of election to be exempt. Pursuant to Chapter 440.05(13), F.S., Notices of election to be exempt and certificates of election to be exempt shall be subject to revocation if, at may time after the filing of the notice or the issuance of the certificate, the person named on the notice or certificate no longer meets the requirements of this section for issuance of a certificate. The department shall revoke a certificate at any time for failure of the person named on the certificate to meet the requirements of this section. QUESTIONS? 1850) 413 -1605 OWC -252 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION TO BE EXEMPT REVISED 09 -06 � - L- E _ _ COLLIER COUNTY BUSINESS TAX . _ - BUSINESS TAX NUMBER: COLLIER- COUNTY TAXCOLL=EGTOR - 2800 W HORSESHOE DRIVE.; FLORIDA 34104 - (239)252 -2977 083107 .- - VISIT OUR WEBSITEAT: Wm,00lliertax,com THIS RECEIPT EXPIRES. $tPTEMBE3_30, 2014 " . �-D a gYATPt,ACE.( BUSINESS FOR'PUBLIC INSPECTION LOCATION: 3093 AVtAMAR -CIR #202 '�- ,,,,�, - 'lyt ° =.- FA1LtlRETO DO SO IS' CONTRARY TO. LOCAL LAWS. _ .' ZONED: HOME OCCUPATIO N .r +,tEGAL-FftA+y ORPO . _ TION ,�+ •THIS TgX'16 NbN- REFUNDABLE - BUSINESS PHONE: 732 -8102 } RUDOLPH -S POOLSERVICE_INC. COUNTY LIC: 34146 , t RUDOLPH HERMAN r - • I i ii I PO BOX 870 NAPLES FL 34106-0000 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 1-- EMPLOYEES CLASSIFICATION: POOL CLEANINGICHEMICAL BAL. CONTRy Rs ; ` DATE 09/30/2013 CLASSIFICATION CODE: 021110101--_ _ - ° == _ _` AMOUNT 18.00 This document is a business tax only,, ThTills. not certiticatio- tha(licensee,is, qual ed. RECEIPT` 6087.42 :It does not permit-the licensee to violate any gxisting tegulatory zoning laws ofthe-state county or_citles- :. does it exemptthe hcersee front any other that 1 c�✓E nor taxes' or permits maybe required bylaw. r + . :'E SE _ 21VER LICEN "E . AN RUDOLPH -J AVIAMAR CIR UNIT 2u NAPLES. FL 34114-0000 M HGT. 6 -03 ISSUE.. EXPIRES' a REST. N7 2081 21 20142 ��mcav en n x •� e2<!Txa r« rcn c ^j�ra[pF; nt a end re�'M