Loading...
CAC Agenda 09/12/2013 2013 Coastal Advisory Committee Agenda September 12 , 2013 Meeting Agenda and Notice COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE(CAC) THURSDAY,SEPTEMBER 12,2013-1:00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS THIRD FLOOR, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES •Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions •2013 CAC MEETING DATES I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda V. Public Comments VI.Approval of CAC Minutes 1.June 20, 3013 VII.Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report VIII. New Business 1. Doctors Pass Contract Award 2.Truck Haul Beach Renourishment Discussion * Backup Material 3. Marco South as Built for Erosion Control Structures and Beach Renourishment Concerns * 2013 South Marco Isalnd Beach Renourishment Post-Constrction and Beach monitoring Report * South Marco Island Erosion Control Structure * 9/4/13 Memorandum from Michael Poff, P.E. (CEC) 4. FEMA Coments on Tropical Storm Fay Renourishment 5. Doctors Pass Jetty Revisions- Mayor Sorey IX. Old Business X.Announcements XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date/Location October 10, 2013 Government Center, 3rd Floor XIII.Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gail D. Hambright at(239) 252-2966. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3335 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities(including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Anthony P. Pires, Jr., Esq., Chairman Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee FROM: Colleen M. Greene, Assistant County Attorne ( ()— DATE: March 18, 2010 RE: Sunshine Law and Agenda question The issue presented is whether the Sunshine Law requires that an agenda be made available prior to board meetings. In summary,the answer is no. The Sunshine Law Manual (2009 Ed. Vol. 31)provides the following: The Attorney General's Office recommends publication of an agenda, if available, in the notice of the meeting;. if an agenda is not available, subject matter summations might be used. However, the courts have held that the Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency provide notice of each item to be discussed via a published agenda. Such a specific requirement has been rejected because it could effectively preclude access to meetings by members of the general public who wish to bring specific issues before a governmental body. See Hough v. Stembridge, 278 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). And see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (posted agenda unnecessary; public body not required to postpone meeting due to inaccurate press report which was not part of the public body's official notice efforts). Thus, the Sunshine Law has been interpreted to require notice of meetings, not of the individual items which may be considered at that meeting. However, other statutes, codes or ordinances may impose such a requirement and agencies subject to those provisions must follow them. Accordingly, the Sunshine Law does not require boards to consider only those matters on a published agenda. "[W]hether to impose a requirement that restricts every relevant commission or board from considering matters not on an agenda is a policy decision to be made by the legislature." Law and Information Services, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 670 So. 2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Today's Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee was properly noticed in compliance with the Sunshine Law on or about February 1, 2010. Further, the agenda for today's meeting was also publically noticed on the County's website on Monday, March 15, 2010. The related back-up materials for the agenda were supplemented and available on the County's website on Wednesday, March 17, 2010. In addition, a number of these materials also appeared on the agenda for the Coastal Advisory Committee meeting on Thursday, March 11, 2010. In my opinion, there is no violation of the Sunshine Law and no legal issue regarding the date the agenda was published. cc: Gary McAlpin,Director, Coastal Zone Management Co ier County Public Services Division Coastal Zone Management TO: CAC Board Members FROM: Gail Hambright, Accountant DATE: December 1, 2012 SUBJECT: 2013 CAC Scheduled Meetings Please mark your calendar for the following 2013 CAC scheduled meeting dates: January 10,2013 February 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 April 11,2013 May 9, 2013 June 13,2013 July 11, 2013 August 8, 2013 September 12,2013 October 10, 2013 November 14,2013 December 12, 2013 All meetings will be held in the Board of County Commissioner's chambers,third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, unless otherwise noted. A public notice will be sent out before each meeting. r,. Collier CountyCoastalZaeManagement.3299 Tarntami Trail East,Suite 103.Naples,Florida 34112-5746.239-252.2966 FAX 239-252-2950 +.C011ier4ov.netfcoest lzonemanc` em@nt CAC September 12,2013 VII-1 Staff Reports 1 of 5 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, June 20, 2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:30 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: John Sorey, III VICE CHAIRMAN: Jim Burke Robert Raymond Joseph A. Moreland Victor Rios Larry Honig (Excused) Debbie Roddy (Vacancy) ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney Gail Hambright, Accountant CAC September 12,2013 VII-1 Staff Reports 2 of 5 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online. I. Call to Order Chairman Sorey called the meeting to order at 2:30PM II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following addition: • Item 4—Doctors Pass Update Second by Mr. Burke. Carried unanimously 6—0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. May 9,2013 Mr. Rios moved to approve the minutes of the May 9, 2013 minutes subject to the following change: • Page 3, paragraph 2—from line 4 -5 from "...Success without S at Wiggins Pass"... to "Success at Wiggins Pass..." Second by Ms. Roddy. Carried unanimously 6—0. VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report—Gary McAlpin The Committee reviewed the "Collier County Tourist Tax Revenue FY 13 TDC Revenue Report"dated through May 2013. 2. Wiggins Pass Straightening—Update Mr. McAlpin reported the work required to remove the rock outcropping is still underway and is expected to be completed this week. Mr. Moreland reported the area has seen environmental improvement with the seagrasses and oyster beds. There are plans underway for a public event to be held in the fall recognizing environmental improvement to the Pass. 3. Erosion Control Structures at Marco South Mr. McAlpin reported the beach renourishment and work on the jetties has been completed. Work continues on the breakwater structures with completion anticipated in approximately 2 months. CAC September 12,2013 VII-1 Staff Reports 3 of 5 Laser Grading Mr. McAlpin reported the project was timed out by turtle nesting season and the area will be reviewed after turtle nesting season to determine any further work necessary. 4. Doctors Pass Update Mr. McAlpin reported: • The County has received the amended permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers. • He anticipates the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Permit to be issued by July 1, 2013. • The development of plans and specifications is underway. • The bid package will be released to the public after all permits have been issued. • It is anticipated the project will be completed by November 1, 2013. VIII. New Business 1. Beach Renourishment Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Update the CAC and TDC relative to bid No. 13-6067R to renourish the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore and Naples Beaches via a off shore sand source utilizing hopper dredges along with presenting alternatives for consideration and solicit Advisory Board recommendations"dated June 20, 2013 for consideration: He reported: • The County previously requested bids for the major beach renourishment project from truck haulers and dredgers with bids being received from truck haulers only. • The County deemed the truck haul bids unqualified and decided to release a second request for bid for the major beach renourishment for response by dredge contractors only. • The County received one bid from the request from Great Lakes Dock and Dredge (GLDD) at $32M. • The large bid amount is due to the high demand for dredging projects including those necessary to repair major storm damage in the northeastern portion of the country and projects approved by the US Army Corps of Engineer in other regions. • The County's budget for the project is approximately$15M and based on the bid received, the following options are being considered: 1. Work with GLDD to evaluate and eliminate, if possible the "High Cost Obstacles and Risks"to reduce the bid price. Some of these might be: • Alternate material screening methods to eliminate dredge screening and downtime. • Eliminate pipeline relocations. • Dredging/renourishment when capacity is available. • Other methods of renourishment in "low fill volume"areas. CAC September 12,2013 VII-1 Staff Reports 4 of 5 2. Reject the GLDD bid and postpone dredging for a year but be prepared to perform emergency truck haul renourishment to deal with critical hot spots as they develop. • This would also include a permitting update component. 3. Reject the GLDD bid and rebid the project utilizing a modified truck haul approach and extremely close coordination with the City of Naples. This project would begin as soon as turtle nesting season ends or the beaches become available and continue until 5/1/2014. Dual sand mines, dual haul/placement contractors and multiple discharge locations on the beach would be required along with approval to stockpile screened sand prior to placement. This approach would be difficult but would be doable with coordinated planning and cooperation by all stakeholders. Discussion occurred on the options proposed including the rationale for the bid amount, the probability of prices decreasing next year, impacts of truck haul renourishment on turtle nesting season, traffic impacts, potential beach access points for the truck haul, etc. Chairman Sorey reported the preliminary conversations with representatives and citizens of the City of Naples indicate a truck haul project, which was previously opposed is "better than no beach renourishment at all." The scope of work would need to incorporate constraints to manage vehicular and pedestrian traffic and possible remediation to any damages on area roadways/bridges, etc. caused by the activity. Speaker Bob Krasowski addressed the Committee supporting Option #3 and recommended, given the cost estimates garnered for dredging renourishment, future workshops be scheduled engage Stakeholders in developing innovative ideas for beach renourishment. Mr. McAlpin requested the Committee provided a recommendation on which Option should be executed. Discussion occurred recommending the Board of County Commissioners execute Option 1 if the revised price quote is within acceptable budgeted parameters. If not, execute Option 3 for a truck haul project. The Committee was polled on the proposed recommendation with consensus reached to endorse it. Ms. Roddy,Mr. Rios, Chairman Sorey,Mr. Moreland and Mr. Burke voted "yes." Mr. Raymond voted "no." 2. Discussion of"What Promotes Tourism"for Beach Inlet Projects * Ordinance 2013-30: Amending the TDC Ordinance * Resolution 2013-81: Amending TDC Fund Policy CAC September 12,2013 VII-1 Staff Reports 5 of 5 Colleen Greene,Assistant County Attorney provided County Ordinance 2013-30 and Resolution 2013-81 for information purposes. She reported County Staff is in the process of developing criteria to aid in determining if items proposed to be funded with Tourist Tax Revenues"promote tourism." The criteria will be based on County Ordinances and Policies, State Statutes and Attorney General Opinions. Staff will present the proposed criteria to the Committee when they have been developed. Ultimately, the intent is to have the criteria approved by the Board of County Commissioners. IX. Old Business None X. Announcements None XI. Committee Member Discussion Mr. Moreland reported the Estuary Conservation Commission has established a program to monitor Bull Shark activity in Wiggins Pass as local residents have reported spotting them in the area. Ms. Roddy recognized efforts for the renourishment at Marco Beaches. XII. Next Meeting Date/Location July 10,2013—Government Center,Administration Bldg. F,3rd Floor There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 3:40 P.M. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee John Sorey,III, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended . CAC September 12,2013 VII-Staff Reports 1 of 20 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX REVENUE FY 13 TDC Revenue Report 31-Aug-2013 Budget FY 13(5%) FY 13 Adopted Reserved by FY 13 Net Variance to FY 13 Description Fund Budget Law Budget FY 13 Forecast Budget Beach Facilities 183 2,368,600 (121,600) 2,247,000 2,200,800 -167,800 TDC Promotion 184 3,588,800 (180,800) 3,408,000 4,182,600 593,800 Non-County Muse 193 342,000 (17,100) 324,900 368,600 26,600 TDC Admin 194 1,667,700 (83,400) 1,584,300 1,797,900 130,200 Beach Renourishr 195 4,809,000 (297,900) 4,511,100 5,266,700 457,700 Promotion Disaste 196 0 - 0 0 0 County Museums 198 1,579,100 (79,100) 1,500,000 1,659,100 80,000 Gross Budget $14,355,200 (779,900) $13,575,300 $15,475,700 $1,120,500 Less 5%Rev Res (779,900) Net Budget 13,575,300 Collections %Budget Collected to %over FY 12 %over FY 11 %over FY 10 Month Actual FY 13 Cum YTD Date collections collections_ collections__ Oct 627,861 627,861 4.374% 19.52% 31.12% 41.11% Nov 734,419 1,362,280 9.490% 6.18% 17.48% 34.27% Dec 959,221 2,321,501 16.172% 3.73% 27.88% 28.74% Jan 1,276,477 3,597,978 25.064% 5.62% 26.42% 20.69% Feb 2,057,493 5,655,471 39.397% 7.89% 28.49% 22.57% Mar 2,396,642 8,052,113 56.092% 3.05% 18.29% 17.89% Apr 3,303,059 11,355,172 79.101% 18.49% 28.68% 37.28% May 1,463,598 12,818,770 89.297% 1.81% 7.88% 10.61% June 1,041,187 13,859,957 96.550% 11.41% 22.39% 31.86% July 831,809 14,691,766 102.345% 13.89% 22.37% 42.35% Aug 838,300 15,530,066 108.184% 7.72% 14.72% 25.24% Sept 0 15,530,066 108.184% n/a n/a n/a Total 15,530,066 15,530 066 8.97% 22.51% 26.48% 7.806% 15475700 Bal to Collect (54,366) Budget Comparison 5 Yr Collect 5 Yr Collect Budgeted Actual Budget to Actual FOrecaSt Month History-Cum History-Monthly Collections Collections $Variance Collections Oct 3.5% 3.5% 498,841 627,861 129,020 537,778 Nov 8.1% 4.7% 667,999 734,419 66,420 720,140p Dec 14.0% 5.9% 847,409 959,221 111,812 913,5541 Jan 22.3% 8.3% 1,189,860 1,276,477 86,617 1,282„735' Feb 35.1% 12.8% 1,840,952 2,057,493 216,541 1,984648` Mar 50.8% 15.7% 2,246,683 2,396,642 149,959 2,422,049' Apr 69.1% 18.3% 2,624,777 3,303,059 678,282 2,829„654, May 79.2% 10.2% 1,457,125 1,463,598 6,473 1,570,861 June 85.4% 6.1% 882,048 1,041,187 159,139 950,897` July 90.3% 4.9% 708,954 831,809 18252:687505 811 764:291 377 1p Aug 95.6% 5.2% 752,630 838,300 ; Sept 100.0% 4.4% 637,921 0 n/a 687,714; Total 100.0% 100.0% 14,355,200 15,530,066 1,812 787 15,475,700, ...................... Tourist Tax Revenue Collection Curve M$3.5 ...-_..... __.... ..___ ......_ _..._. 0 $3.0 ___.. .......... ...._... $2.5 .. ................ ......... 0$2.0 u •--Budgeted d---Actual $1.0 •Forecast $0.0 0 z O g u. 5 ¢ g � 00 N 9/3/20139:40 AM H:1Revenue Reporiv,lonthly Gas,Saks,and TDC Receipts CAC September 12,2013 VII-Staff Reports 2 of 20 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX REVENUE FY 13 TDC Revenue Report 31-Aug-2013 Budget Comparison 5 Yr Collect 5 Yr Collect Budgeted Actual Budget to Actual Forecast Month History-Cum History-Monthly Collections Collections $Variance Collections Oct 3.5% 3.5% 498,841 627,861 129,020 537,778' Nov 8.1% 4.7% 667,999 734,419 66,420 720,140` Dec 14.0% 5.9% 847,409 959,221 111,812 913,554 Jan 22.3% 8.3% 1,189,860 1,276,477 86,617 1,282,735 Feb 35.1% 12.8% 1,840,952 2,057,493 216,541 1,984,648 Mar 50.8% 15.7% 2,246,683 2,396,642 149,959 2,422,049 Apr 69.1% 18.3% 2,624,777 3,303,059 678,282 2,829,654 May 79.2% 10.2% 1,457,125 1,463,598 6,473 1,670,861 June 85.4% 6.1% 882,048 1,041,187 159,139 950,897, July 90.3% 4.9% 708,954 831,809 122,855 764,291 Aug 95.6% 5.2% 752,630 838,300 85,670 811,377 Sept 100.0% 4.4% 637,921 0 n/a 687,714' Total 100.0% 100.0% 14,355,200 15,530,066 1,812,787 15,475,700:. Tourist Tax Revenue Collection Curve $3.5 f $3.0 $2.5 .......... s o $2.0 _....... .__ I m o $1.5 Budgeted u Actual $1.0 ......... 4:. •Forecast $0.5 $0.0 IDO p 8 v 5) ' a m c 2) a z 0 1 g a g c 9/3/20139:39 AM H:\Revenue Report\Monthly Gras,Sales,and TDC Receipts CAC September 12,2013 VII-Staff Reports 3 of 20 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX REVENUE FY 13 TDC Revenue Report 31-Aug-2013 Budget FY 13 Adopted FY 13(5%) FY 13 Net Variance to FY 13 Description Fund Budget Reserved by Law Budget _ FY 13 Forecast Budget Beach Facilities 183 2,368,600 (121,600) 2,247,000 2,200,800 -167.800 TDC Promotion 184 3,588,800 (180,800) 3,408,000 4,182,600 593,800 Non-County Muse 193 342,000 (17,100) 324,900 368,600 26,600 TDCAdmin 194 1,667,700 (83,400) 1,584,300 1,797,900 130,200 Beach Renourishr 195 4,809,000 (297,900) 4,511,100 5,266,700 457,700 Promotion Disaste 196 0 - 0 0 0 County Museums 198 1,579,100 (79,100) 1,500,000 1,659,100 80,000 Gross Budget $14,355,200 (779,900) $13,575,300 $15,475,700 $1,120,500 Less 5%Rev Res (779,900) Net Budget 13,575,300 Collections %Budget Collected to %over FY 12 %over FY 11 %over FY 10 Month Actual FY 13 Cum YTD Date collections collections collections Oct 627,861 627,861 4.374% 19.52% 31.12% 41.11% Nov 734,419 1,362,280 9.490% 6.18% 17.48% 34.27% Dec 959,221 2,321,501 16.172% 3.73% 27.88% 28.74% Jan 1,276,477 3,597,978 25.064% 5.62% 26.42% 20.69% Feb 2,057,493 5,655,471 39.397% 7.89% 28.49% 22.57% Mar 2,396,642 8,052,113 56.092% 3.05% 18.29% 17.89% Apr 3,303,059 11,355,172 79.101% 18.49% 28.68% 37.28% May 1,463,598 12,818,770 89.297% 1.81% 7.88% 10.61% June 1,041,187 13,859,957 96.550% 11.41% 22.39% 31.86% July 831,809 14,691,766 102.345% 13.89% 22.37% 42.35% Aug 838,300 15,530,066 108.184% 7.72% 14.72% 25.24% Sept 0 15,530,066 108.184% n/a n/a n/a Total 15,530,066 15,530,066 8.97% 22.51% 26.48% 6;71,P141,'-:NZli);74,1.40,74 7.806% 15475700 Bal to Collect (54,366) 9/3/20139:38AM H:1Revenue Report\Monthly Gas,Sales,and TDC Receipts Al E no coo.Th N N U c S v m C/] m N o l0 CO p CO�/? N c/] CO Cn V] o HS p ion .y H m F rn F F r E, .-i O O H E F W 6 m 0. M. P O. cn w w w w P. w w CO PO 5 0 5 m m a w o CD a N Q b �'• Q Ln Q' o4 o rn N m CO CO U so 0 W .-a N ti w o h W m m k �l ti �i N m 'N N 0 ti i .>. _ 7+ p LO ^ .14 W p CO LII r, m C o F # w CO w o F . N w U CO r a a °° Q o Q ° z °� «� P4 a n, ce c on o ,� E w .--� m CO R o u ,o LN-, ., Ol .-1 CO Ln o CO m pppq N 1-7 Cs. N C.. o CO m W W W W ou w d, .-1 a' w w sco Zia m * m m ,n zy �d , rn m ti r- N m l0 e CV " "' Cc] Co P w U U ,, CJ o a Q C q N N 0 ry m O o V' Q, m O > > C cr 0 2 .y 7 2 t` 2 Ln 00 Z m ° O co .-+ N o CV VD • P3 8 s CC N N U 6S g en o o en m en o en m SO H ti F Na F o F F F 0. F O o LC) En sn w c.D a E,, eeC n r 0. 0.0 w Co. �en 0 en 0 cn en 5 m o o Q 04 e 4 m no. 4 e Q . m . 0 5 KC o rn >+ c--- .-� 6 Q co H m SO SO Cs- .ti h N h N OJ m i!l .H �-] SO on so SO 0 CO 8 '' ro Q ,.... vr VD m o -_ en m co le fix' = " m a• ne 4 K m o --.. m oc ..--,~ x ' # -0 C.: }R � m a C gg W o 0a � a �a am a pa a C H m p R `.7 a P. a P H P sn CT m VD cr. cle En En 0 CD D. o o " m ry d.0 co N° N m Ca N: _ o 1r N° W Col NCO b w w O w ° w w w w on w w N CO m m w w m a m o^.. ti a _ r..-0 oz "' m o on Or oo OD sO SID ti O) O1 m N ti 0 lSO U N 0 0 U A U U o °(-, h 0 OD W O O N.--.1 l .-r q A 0, A A CO •- q q N m m Ca O Oi 9 ° n 0 ° z en z N z z o z zN z o en z en N LSI oc SP so m N m o V H o H H En En N V •~ ' U O O O O N O O r O 0 0 w °O N r CO CO en no tr, L g@ zr; tP: E a g tr. 47: Zg C-3 g M 4" RI s • r .sa g R A •-'11 e El 4 a a a EcD g I 8 61 54 R R R Am_ IFt.. tei a -3 3 g- '7, A .5 ri a r. te. 8 M El- k .5 a 2 a gl :61 a 2 § § § g g g N • 8 n 3 El rer ars 1. gl 3 v, 2 A u ,74 a r, 74 A 3: a '7•• g A k 8 g I 5 .%? g '41 A E =7- ,71 L.; a a a 8 NI a g. A ta A -I N .tf4 a P. A A A -;,^." A A .s1 ,7; I Foi ;tzr v. 4 if-1 9., ER a. g § § g § a s r LI; E n rg• -2 E co ea 5 giR zza a a 11A k gIa 'AAR _ 11 §. R. A. WR 7.7.1R a a FS g g I g k g — Plf agile E4-1 § „, § 8 Vrj 0., se. vs •"- A al g 41 a 5. E I 11 S F21 a A n Fi k 'ar= fl a 5 g § § § § ul Cr Le. •0 • g Lth't g z a E▪ „ , • - R A A 22 L,6 k- a a g A LA a a '2A1 In P. 4 rci a g ,r4 M g .q I 7 a FF - M g4 g - g g g • § g § § •-a t I Ef c, g Q.. gl. M. DI R 0 In :1"."... "g = M .I.8 .U... t & W - la slaxx K — n- g .,. P6- ..,, ....... :-...... . ... ...... 4;i •-,,,...'.m. Ig FE i El ; g 12 1: 11 i _ .-1 .. ,.., .-.: .-.r .-: ...; ....: .-.. .-4 ...: = e ar 8 ._, P2 q a :,..4 , __ 5; 8, ..•, 1 i 1 g 5 5 rE- i lik REA: a 4a g F-_ ..: .61 4 ... g: . -. `41 glAIR R A •A 'AP . z t A "A A 'A a g a 15_ E 3, 2E4 c — c " El 5 5 4- g g 8 F,_ Ei• g NI §. w -1 S g & & 55 PERE § 1 •=4 ,Al a .4 Ei r4 R. 3 Ei z "I a Ki 5 i3 E ■-■ c.) k a. 4 ..52 k" ot a a a al 'Q. R 'Ani 8 g g § § " .c• - § § § sEWAREmr-' an. le. vs an- an- E § Y.; A :th; FP; I fri g I 5- • a '0_ m_ g_ — — a a R! g a k . a . Ra 2 s g 11 F4. 8 Efi 49 a Li a- a L.; a 3 L7,7 al • E5. E ;74 5 - :74 a • Fs g g g g g I 2. # ¥- F m = # k k \ 7 % \ i \ \\ k } ) ) \ 7 \ \ \ \ } \ } \ - _ _ / k a a $ ( \ a a : , , _ •` a - # J k \ \ { \ \ \ §g \ $ ZEI - / / } \ \ \ \ \\ k 2 / \ } \ .7' \ � I 2 2 / _ e « ) f A ) \ \ k/ I \� � m 77 } A } { \ d _ 2 = a \ / » \ ■ A ■ ■ g , , - § / \ 2 \ k \ \ \ k ,q, 4 c■F :g 'SI 8 Ce Enz a a 4 a :4 a 61 11 5 R, z g § • E a a. gi a. a A g g 8 I E rz, "". • a' a ti at a 4, a gRE g zg •=9. a a g § ta a RI 4 =7' g E kl g • ""• .3. - A A RI FA 1:01 Fi g g k E 2 g =4 - Z7+ 2 et F. g t74, FiggINg-g ,g2 g § 4 § 2,3 k rif -zz ,r'.; '4 5 - 2 :a LI. a A E.. E-1 .= 1-I a a a w- gi a a E_ :=1 g 5 2. A 7-xl a I I E. I a. a a a a a 5 " " a `‘ A .7, 47, a EA, g 1'1 5 741 121 7;1 Ft ER g 71 'L-4 a a a a it § § a a E 7-1 g 12EOUIEZg_ g. g...,* E 11 s :.•=2., A cr, =1 1 5 T., A 5 g_ .74 .7; 474. I I NI 51•1 A a. Li, 5, Ei •al — gi a a a a a a a ri g § § ,..., D -,- -,.. , m X 4 gt ‘... ..„--:- m ..,... r.. g 2F3 -.- ¢ .,..„._— o, .7., . :.-.., ,,-... .,.., ,.... ..... ...„ ..i. .-.. ,.., . .. ,:,_ •Al , , a 2 41 g a 8 a- gl .4 gi:IF Er 'A R = 0 W •-x ,--; .-..r .....- ....r .-, ....r ...... .-1- mI- ni c ... — Sm - r.2 E.,. - 71.- c, il _-_, -, rz,, Ei .7., ,_, 1 A 2 A 8 E't• A •,-, _ ,-, .-, .--.1 .-r .-..r .-4 ..4.16' = 6 t-J CL .- , M 1 El. = .0 8 ,,,_,,., 1 ..- ¢ * 1 k' rri".„ a ,-, aDi .-,,,-, E..--, k g . , . , , , n5 0 21 P1-. -:=1 [51. M. g.. M. P=IPlg - - ;IC- i '-'.- ,,-;- '-. "."- , -,-, ..-: A' •A ER k" .r.-2-, Rk , g ,g .,,,. .,:-... ":4 1 § glE274 2 gi4izEz .z. z. D 1 CAC September 12,2013 VIII-2 New Business 1 of 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to award Invitation to Bid (ITB) 13-6147 Collier County Beach Renourishment Project to Eastman Aggregates (renourishment of Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay) for $3,532,179.99 and Phillips and Jordan (renourishment of Park Shore and Naples Beach) for $5,897,771.27; authorize the Chairwoman to execute two county attorney approved contracts to both firms; make a finding that this item promotes tourism; and approve all necessary budget amendments. OBJECTIVE: To approve the standard construction contracts and budget amendments for Eastman Aggregates to renourish the Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay beaches with a maximum of 95,000 CY's of upland sand for a maximum cost of$3,532,179.99 and for Phillips and Jordan to renourish the Park Shore and Naples beaches with a maximum of 155,000 CY's of upland sand for a maximum price of$5,897,771.27. The overall price for renourishment of the beaches with two (2) contractors will not exceed $9,429,951.26. Make a finding that this item promotes tourism. CONSIDERATIONS: ITB 13-6147 Collier County Beach Renourishment Project was posted on July 24, 2013 with notices sent to 1,704 firms and 64 firms downloading full packages. The solicitation timeframe was abbreviated per the Board of County Commissioners (Board) declaration of an emergency, and consistent with Florida statutes. Four (4) responses were received on the August 8, 2013 due date. Staff is recommending two (2) truck haul/placement contractors to perform the upcoming beach renourishment work. This will allow the project to maximize contractor/hauling resources while focusing effort and expertise to complete the overall project by January 1, 2014. Two (2) contractors will also provide the lowest price combination for the overall project by $202,593.80. The total price for renourishment of the beaches with two (2) contractors will be $9,429,951.26. Bid and Contractor Evaluations: The lowest single bidder, Eastman Aggregates, submitted a price of$9,632,545.06. A historical spreadsheet is attached and marked as Attachment A. Our proposed project is consistent with the sand and fixed cost price for our previous truck haul projects but the hauling and placement price is slightly higher but justified due to schedule constraints, wet beach placement and the potential for liquidated damages. Staff is recommending that Eastman Aggregates renourish the Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay beaches by placing approximately 95,000 CY's of material on these beaches. Eastman Aggregate has performed the three previous truck haul projects in Collier County and has done so without incident. The price for this portion of the project is $3,532,179.99. The Pelican Bay split out quantity of 35,000 CY will cost approximately $1,300,000 and be reimbursed by Pelican Bay. No renourishment of the Pelican Bay beaches will occur without an executed Memorandum of Agreement between Collier County and the responsible Pelican Bay organization(s). Staff is also recommending that Phillips and Jordan, the low bidder for the Park Shore and Naples portion of this project be awarded this work. This portion places 155,000 CY's of CAC September 12,2013 VIII-2 New Business 2 of 4 material on the beach and will cost $5,897,771.27. Phillips and Jordan is a large, family owned company that has been in business for over 60 years. They are located in Zephyrhills and have the capacity and skill to perform this work. They have performed a number of beach renourishment projects in the early 2000's. The most recent was a 120,000 CY renourishment in Brevard County in 2005. They performed a 20,000 CY renourished for Collier County on the Park Shore Beach in 2004 with no apparent issues. They have performed a total of five truck haul renourishment projects. Sand Supply and Mine Operations: Stewart Mine in Immokalee will provide sand for this project. Stewart is stockpiling sand and intends to have 100,000 tons stockpiled by 9/15. Their production rate is 5,000 tons per day and this will be sufficient with the stockpiled sand to meet production needs. Two additional mines are available if conditions warrant. The sand purchase will be a direct pass through from the truck haul/placement contractors to Collier County. Sand costs will be invoiced separately and payable when delivered to the unloading sites on Vanderbilt, Park Shore or Naples beaches. $3,180,000 is the direct purchase price for 375,000 tons of sand for this project. Construction Engineering, Inspection and Project Management: Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) will be performed by Collier County CZM with direct job bank inspectors and with third party auditing, quality assurance and reporting provided by Atkins Engineering. Overall CEI is expected to cost less than $200,000 with full time inspection at the mine, the beaches and each of the three unloading operations. Coastal Planning and Engineering (CP&E) will perform field engineering and quality control inspections and will continue to be the Engineer of Record and provide project certification at project completion. The pre- renourishment baseline survey for Biological Monitoring is being conducted by CP&E and will be completed prior to the project construction start date. A FDEP preconstruction meeting as required by permit is scheduled for 9/12/2013. Staff is working truck routes, vehicle inspections, staging areas, maintenance of traffic and speed zone enforcement with the Collier County Sheriff's Department and the City of Naples Police Department. Hours of operation will be sunup to sundown, six days a week. No operations will take place the last four days of Thanksgiving week or Christmas week. Staff is seeking Board approval for hours of operation to correspond with daylight hours and Board understanding that with these hours of operation, corresponding construction noise will occur on the beach. Doctors Pass Dredging: Doctors Pass dredging is currently out for bid. Bids were received on 8/30/13. Staff is targeting to award the Doctors Pass dredging contract on 9/24/2013 and completion of the work by 11/1/13 to 11/15/13. Coarser grain sand from the truck haul renourishment will be placed on top of the dredged material from Doctors Pass to obtain a longer beach life. 36,000-38,000 CY's of dredged material is expected to be placed on the beaches south of Doctors Pass at an estimated cost of$738,000. Doctors Pass dredging is independent and in addition to the truck haul beach renourishment south of Doctors Pass. Permit Considerations and Permit Challenge: The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit modification was issued on 8/16/2013 without petitioned community or citizen opposition. CAC September 12,2013 VIII-2 New Business 3 of 4 A 10-year Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit is currently valid but will expire on 1/12/2015. Each specific renourishment event and any activities deviating from the original permit conditions require a permit modification. Ten (10) permit modifications have been issued to date and involve everything from authorizing emergency truck haul renourishment events to moving pipeline corridors. The permit was modified for this project and issued on 7/26/2013. FDEP permit activity, sequencing and timing is as follows: • Original permit modification request submitted to FDEP on 11/9/2012. • Request for Additional Information (RAI) submitted to Collier County from FDEP on 12/13/2012. • Collier County response to FDEP's RAI on 3/18/2013. • FDEP deemed Collier County Permit Modification Application complete on 5/3/2013. • FDEP Issued Collier County's Permit Modification on 7/26/2013. • On 8/9/2013, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) received a petition for an administrative hearing from a Collier County resident. • On 8/23/2013, FDEP issued an Order Dismissing the Petition with Leave to Amend. The Administrative Hearing petition challenged FDEP's decision to issue a permit modification to Collier County for beach renourishment activities specifically, FDEP's allowing renourishment during the shoulders of turtle nesting season. Turtle nesting season officially begins 5/1 and ends on 10/31 of each year. Actual nesting history from 2007 to 2012 was reviewed and verified. The data this year indicates that all nesting activity has been completed and all except five (5) nests will have hatched by approximately 9/23/2013. Collier County will avoid contact with these nests by bypassing these locations during sand placement. On 8/23/2013, FDEP issued an Order Dismissing the Petition with Leave to Amend. This order provides ten (10) calendar days for the Petitioner to file an amended petition on or before 9/3/2013. If the amended petition is denied with prejudice, the petitioner may then file a motion in the Second District Court of appeals to appeal the FDEP denial. The current plan is to issue the Notice-to-Proceed (NTP) by 9/17/13. Only five (5) turtle nests will remain un-hatched as of 9/23/2013. Beach sand placement will begin on 9/23/2013 with full capacity production by 10/7/2013. Our target is to have this project substantially completed by 1/1/2014 with Liquidated Damages occurring after 2/1/2014. Delays in issuing the NTP as a result of a continued permit challenge will delay anticipated construction completion and Liquidated Damages completion dates accordingly. A late start to renourishment may impact the renourishment quantities. Additionally, if renourishment quantities are reduced by more than 25% below the bid volumes, then new unit prices may have to be negotiated with the hauling/placement contractors. FISCAL IMPACT: In the Tentative FY14 Budget, $15M is budgeted for major County/Naples beach renourishment in TDC Beach Renourishment Fund (195) under Project 80096. In order to proceed with the proposed contract award in September 2013 a budget amendment shifting the project budget from FY14 back to FY13 is required. This budget amendment will reduce reserves and establish FY13 project funding under Project 80096 in the amount of$9,430,000. The FY14 budget for Project 80096 will be reduced to reflect the action taken on this item. This CAC September 12,2013 VIII-2 New Business 4 of 4 revision will be done through a FY14 Budget Resolution presented at the second FY14 Budget Adoption Hearing on September 19. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:Ther e is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMNEDATION: The Coastal Advisory Committee recommended on 6/20/2013 to proceed to renourish all the beaches via truck haul as soon as possible with a 5-1 vote. TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL RECOMMNEDATION: The Tourist Development Council met on 6/24/2013 voted 5-4 to postpone the dredging for one to two years but perform emergency truck haul as needed. CITY OF NAPLES RECOMMENDATION: The Naples City Council voted on Wednesday, August 21, 2013 to confirm acceptance of the 2013 Collier County Beach Renourishment Project to provide 155,000 cubic yards of sand through truck haul to the Naples Beaches (Park Shore and Naples). LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval.—CMG RECOMMENDATION: To award Invitation to Bid (ITB) 13-6147 Collier County Beach Renourishment Project to Eastman Aggregates (renouishment of Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay) for $3,532,179.99 and Phillips and Jordan (renourishment of Park Shore and Naples Beach) for $5,897,771.27; authorize the Chairwoman to execute two County Attorney approved contracts to both firms; make a finding that this item promotes tourism; and approve all necessary budget amendments. Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department Attachments: Attachment A—Historical Truck Haul Cost Spreadsheet Attachment B—Eastman Aggregates Enterprises Contract- http://www.colliergov.net/FTP/AgendaSept9 13/ITEM 11 En StampedContractEastman.pdf (A hard copy is also available at the County Manager's Office) Attachment C—Phillips and Jordan Contract- http://www.colliergov.net/FTP/AgendaSept9I3/ITEM l l ECStampedContractPhillips&Jordan.pd I (A hard copy is also available at the County Manager's Office) Attachment D—Revised Bid Tabulation v ,-� In O \ UI \ Q O ..i m m r`i m z of z z r-i vi v to. o 00 N. 1O v J O '4. Ir a 00 UI y in v> 47 ?• l.0 O z Oo - -a+ \ \ 0 t'0 IUD .1-1•^▪ o z o z z z v`ti m m m y 111 V1 0 tR i? i? I ' I v m m • N.. c"1 rI ;.:a 0 M O w -r M O 0 t0 .a-1 0 tD 0 000 n �O, '.0 N 01 00 M 0 (N 0 '.0 N i4*7 Ln�v . ''l In O N in. 00 V} '. V? 4J 4- *1 '.0 00 ,-I LQ N- N V? -Mi w 10 it O n. 0 v1 N N O .-1 O r-I O 01 CO CO s. .= ID V1 in a) M tf1 lD O N 01 of tFCCOvp 0 N M M co 0 (fl N N N N N Q N '.0 m N i? t/? M V1 i?r_i w. ',' 0^0 N N 00 Tr O m t0 N m t VI tn. to V? Q 0 a C 001 0 0 O "1 a 00 ^ 0 00 001 m N c 0 •d l0 M co N O I . 01 M m E 00 00 (Q W 0 in IN LM? L QN'::., N 0 Ill N 0 N 0 01 .i .-i t ".: 3 0 0 0 ,4 I% O n O N IA p� l 0 0 N O N O N 1A N O O. m 01 0 N O V} N U1. iA IA a:\ .-i V f^YI N 000 (ND c f0 W 5 ai m Iri t ca 1 0 t N. o 0 o In IMn o (N 0 m .^-1 t .1 0 O .--i 01 up 1!1 O O 00 O N I!1 N 1n M 0' C m In I11 0 VL 0 V? .1 to N a c:`1 (N t^ N O 0l l0 t.0 EJ• IL 01 M Li. h. . t!? 1.1). ify. U i;1. V v U LA\ V f0 0 v .0 0 '0 1 <.. N CO T3 0. m vl a).0 H = Y0 0 in E v VI C c 04 ro c O ?, m p 0 >. I= In 0 u, z To m c. - 0 p -0 '' -0 a+ CL c 2 X a 00 EO- 00 00 I-O H to I- U. C' N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .CO. •� co Vl O I,l CO CO 00 I, 0'0 OOpp 1� t)D M 00 N 00 'GI an n W O n .'-1 n O CO 00 n 00 aY N V CD' V N V 'GI .--I V N 00 01 00 tll 00 to 00 .-I •7 O 00 to 00 to 00 to 00 to tll tO .-.1 O. .- .M-I •--1 '-1 N rr-- ran tO •--1 •--� •--� '"" m o m a ..0 V M tl(1 N t~O CO O V T > > > > > > > I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 8888888mo°'l 88888888888 '88 8 . . 000888 8N- °l 8tO00 tO ONI80003tO A y H N co ■ f: M■ Si l N .-i V 1-- N CO CO N 00 n CT CO tll N CO, p Ol CO Ol tO '-I f!1 tO 1- N O 0T V to m V l0 .-I tO' N .••1 tO N O tO tO tO tO tD n CO tO .-t tO .-1 1-1 CO V' O Ol 0 O CO O CO O_ N I- N. N 4 1\ CO - - N. o) 1• tll 01 .-1 1, .-1 .-1 1-1 .-( tD C W .--I M .--1 CO O Q1 . E Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V} L n C p p � c 10 S V .- •7 tt) O S M W O0 N 00 M 0O .--I p Ol tO O E 8 V LA V Ol a 0 V a 0 0 t0 14.1 C 0 ._ 0000 1 ,- (Cp 0)) 0) IT .-I.�i .--1 .-I.�-/ a�-1 CO CO N .'-1 CC W a V V Ol ul 01 U, 0) N U, N N N 0, 0) .+ CO CO CO N O N .ti tr, > > > > > > > > > Z u C N O O V '0 co co Co Vi to to (O (O CO tO V/ �t N N N N N N N N N N N N �+ CD CD O O ;y: O O O O CO CD CO O O U G.,- 0 0 to to CM U) U) 0 0 CD C3 CD C3 .- -c- 00 ,C,.CO N 3 mi OOi 00 U, �. V OV c' co (r) 1-1- a r a 01 0 :C C C C C .'Y.. C C C C C C C C I- CC0 O O O O C O - N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � J I- 1-- 1- 1- J J -1 m':J 1_ 1- I- h 1- 1.- 1- F- J J J 0 e d C 0 '�0 O c C O re . co C -0 CO N m U .0 -0 ffi 0 co o .a a0, •t _. n u0 o ..0.. 0 N o E c ffi 4 m 0 o LC° E Ts ... w E -°°'. 0 C E 1n ffi � 3 0 0 m to m 00 a 0 N L C v 2 .0 m .-N t. N U m tC L2 N 2 t a) L L _N 0- •V:..[p N 0 c L3 -5 > C U t0 CO N d a3om m CD ; 00 0 m a) mZ -ZO e C ro w m C m •..•f W : 0_ 0 m O m CO 12 2 N a) D. e C c m ffi t N L L CO U N > m a 'C 'Q, 6 0 C m a c Z m C C Z co ) ....CO :q. C m C > O N V Z L L C m C L C (0 C a a m a c t 2 O N N NN ca ,@p O _-' •QC. v Ca ,NOI) (D 2 (0 (On CD u2i o U e 0 , � N m O a) c°; �) �° a�i C m t0 O t0 NN NN O) CO L z .Q c a U N U N N O Fes- C O a. > > m a m I- -0 a a s (0 Z (0 a co Z co •E 1_ CO Y 0 ° E V O -C3 U 'C O N ..c O "0 �O -O �O -O -O -O 'C O (0 'C a Q C 'O C 'O C O °3 > C -0 C 'O C "0 C '0 C 0 8 a a N > La o 94 -t 54 o o C o •) m o o c 0 0 0 0 0Z• c 0 co a, N >. a T 0_ N >. a N T 0_ T 0. T a T d N T N C00 - d fO n N N = d N d to d co n N N Q, 0_ c 0_ c 'E •.6 2 N n c o_ c n c Iz c -e •c 2 v c C O = N / N F f6 I It O / N / N l@ n N - f0 = a 2co1- col- 1- 2 � ..( 2m 1= m 1= mF- co 1= 1- 2m c5 3 a+ V, ,- N M V CO (0 1� CO g, . at O .- N M cr Lo (0 N- CO 0) O . E .� E N 0 N . a = ,a'. L,t L.. epLCIIIVtll IL,LV I VIII-3 1 of 76 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHMENT 2013 POST-CONSTRUCTION AND BEACH MONITORING REPORT 9 k r 1G, F a. i i"t�S .,h, ,""+ lop DEP Permit 0235209-003-JC Prepared for: Collier County Coastal Zone Management W. Harmon Turner Bldg. Suite 103 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 and Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 August 7,2013 CEC File No. 11.122 Prepared by: COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC V/'1V oz pLCIIIUCI IL,LU IJ South Marco Island Beach Renourishm VIII-3 ent 2 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK 1 3.0 SURVEYS 1 4.0 FILL AREA 1 6.0 SEDIMENT MONITORING 6 7.0 CONCLUSION 7 lh1l oepte111UC1 i L,Lt.)I South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 3 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location Map 2 ii 1�M1�OCIJLellIllel I L,LV 10 South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 4 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Shoreline Positions at MHW 3 Table 2. Beach Volume Changes 4 Table 3. Volume Changes in Dredge Area 5 iii l�Ml�oeptei!wet IL,LV Is) South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 5 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX 1. SURVEY REPORTS AND DATA APPENDIX 2.FILL AREA PROFILES APPENDIX 3.DREDGE AREA CROSS SECTIONS APPENDIX 4. SEDIMENT TESTING RESULTS iv l,Ml,JCpLCIIIUCI I L,LV 1 J South Marco Island Beach Renourishment viii-3 6 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION Collier County completed construction of the 2013 South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project. This report summarizes the construction and presents the pre- and post-construction surveys required by the Physical Monitoring Plan (PMP) outlined in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Permit 0235209-003-JC. The Contractor, Cavache Inc., mobilized to the work area on March 1, 2013 and completed demobilizing by April 30, 2013. Collier County completed the beach tilling by April 29, 2013. Based upon the surveys provided by Cavache, approximately 77,800 cubic yards (CY) of sand were excavated from the Caxambas Pass borrow area and placed within the pay template and over 80,000 CY of sand were placed within the permitted fill area between FDEP monuments R- 146 and G-4 (Figure 1). Sand placement began at the southern groin at G-4 and extended northward to approximately 400 feet south of R-146 along approximately 2,300 feet of shoreline. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The pre- and post-construction monitoring surveys were conducted using the profile lines at the following monuments: R139 through R-148, G-1 through G-5, K1, and K2. The cross section lines of the borrow area in Caxambas Pass were spaced approximately 100 feet apart. The fill area survey extent was sufficient to compute changes in shoreline at Mean High Water (MHW = +0.44 feet NAVD88) and volume to Depth of Closure (DOC = -11.8 feet NAVD88). The report summarizes and discusses the data including volume and shoreline changes within the project area. All work activities and deliverables were conducted in accordance with the latest update of the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects, Sections 01000, 01100 and Section 01200 where applicable. 3.0 SURVEYS Hyatt Survey Services, Inc. (Hyatt) conducted the pre- and post-construction surveys of beach profiles and the Caxambas Pass borrow area for the PMP. Hyatt's survey reports along with the data disk are presented in Appendix 1. The construction surveys utilized for determining payment and the construction stake-out were conducted by Marco Surveying and Mapping, LLC. 4.0 FILL AREA Appendix 2 presents the profiles measured for the pre- and post-construction R-monument surveys prepared by Hyatt. Table 1 presents the shoreline positions at MHW and the changes in shoreline position equal to the post-construction survey minus the pre-construction survey. Within the primary fill area extending from 400 feet south of R-146 to the northern groin, the average fill width measured at MHW was on the order of 120 feet. Between the two groins, the average fill width measured at MHW was approximately 40 feet. Utilizing all of the profiles within the fill area, the average fill width measured at MHW was on the order of 70 feet. 1 '../"\L OeptC111LJCl IL,LV I South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 7 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report Table 2 presents the overall volumetric changes to DOC calculated from comparing the pre- and post-construction R-monument surveys. Based on the R-monument surveys, the volume placed from 400 feet south of R-146 to G-4 equated to approximately 72,300 CY. The difference between the pay volume and this computation is attributed to the following: varied spacing and azimuths of the R-monument surveys, this computation extended to DOC while the pay surveys extended approximately 100 feet past the toe of fill, and the profiles within the southern segments of the fill area experienced initial equilibration during the construction period. cr , • P _ ; 4' ♦ 7 ;-. c <• 0 rN d Q I t,' J• :+ w 4 S/2 . w;� ,. J - cr r: ` w 0 Z - 4 7 ub e` .. L i .s ,..f-'4.7:' : a r • + .. '' lAwito j,L r 4,,, „.-; „,,,.44,144,-.:. _1 , r- w I , 1 . a _ t,. lei.t ` _i ! 4, .;; -1.- 4,..'40.--,-.,t.fr:' - .-:.,..Y,.:7;': CO Y w }} GO Lu 11-1 03 x . 1116:,.,* cn ;ea • Q a. 2W' Q U !! 2 P Q CL U Figure 1. Location Map. 2 V/\% O .)L IIlUC1 IL,LV IJ South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 8 of 76 _-_ 2013 Post-Construction Report Table 1. Shoreline Positions at MHW Pre-Fill MHW Post- Fill Change Monument Position MHW Position (ft) (ft) (ft) R-139 744.7 750.3 5.6 R-140 534.8 540.1 5.3 R-141 467.6 487.9 20.3 R-142 461.1 481.8 20.7 R-143 380.5 400.3 19.8 R-144 368.1 367.4 -0.7 R-145 380.5 386.7 6.2 R-146 439.3 453.5 14.2 R-147 315.7 410.4 94.7 co R-148 312.1 440.4 128.3 G-1 229.0 358.8 129.8 G-2 98.3 130.4 32.1 4; G-3 47.3 107.6 60.3 G-4 29.3 55.9 26.6 G5 20.0 22.3 2.3 K1 89.9 86.1 -3.8 K2 204.3 197.1 -7.2 3 VMV oep ei11UC1 IL,LV IJ South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 9 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report Table 2. Beach Volume Changes Average Total Cell Area Length Volume Monument 3 Cell Area 3 Volume �Yd /ft) (ft) (Yd (yd /ft) ) (yd3) R139 4.3 1.9 732.0 1,362 R140 -0.5 -0.5 1,189.9 -592 R141 -0.5 -2.9 975.9 -2,816 R142 -5.3 -2,321 -3.1 1,017.6 -3,202 R143 -1.0 0.5 1,041.3 495 R144 1.9 1.5 1,044.7 1,564 R145 1.1 0.9 925.7 868 R146 0.8 R146+400 31.1* 31.1 590.2 18,355 R147 31.1 38.6 854.7 32,985 G1 46.1 33.9 548.8 18,588 72,311 w G2 21.7 1.4 114.6 157 G3 16.5 8.1 186.5 1,507 G4 -0.3 3.2 227.1 719 G5 6.7 719 Caxambas Pass K1 -18.9 -8.5 1,613.9 -13,715 -13,715 K2 1.8 * Cell Area taken from R147 4 '.P'L.JG�JL fl IUGI I L,L J I J South Marco Island Beach Renourishment V1113 10 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report 5.0 DREDGE AREA Appendix 3 presents the dredge area cross sections measured for the pre-and post-construction surveys by Hyatt. The net volume change within the borrow area was approximately 74,200 cubic yards (Table 3). The difference between the pay volume and the net volume change within the borrow area is attributed to infilling during construction. Table 3. Volume Changes in Dredge Area Cell Area I Average I Volume Station Cell r) Cell Area Length (ft) Volume (yd./ft) 1+00 0.0 0.0 100 0 2+00 0.0 0.0 100 0 3+00 0.0 0.0 100 0 4+00 0.0 0.0 100 0 5+00 0.0 0.0 100 0 6+00 0.0 0.0 100 0 7+00 0.0 23.5 100 2,352 8+00 47.0 57.1 100 5,709 9+00 67.1 63.5 100 6,350 10+00 59.9 40.3 100 4,034 11+00 20.8 10.4 100 1,041 12+00 0.0 4.8 100 482 13+00 9.6 15.6 100 1,561 14+00 21.6 21.5 100 2,146 15+00 21.4 19.9 100 1,991 16+00 18.5 33.6 100 3,359 17+00 48.7 57.1 100 5,713 18+00 65.5 84.2 100 8,424 5 lMl opLCIIIUC! IL,LV IJ South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 11 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report Average Cell Area Volume Station (yd3/ft) Cell Area Length(ft) (yd3) (yd /ft) 19+00 102.9 108.8 100 10,882 20+00 114.7 103.9 100 10,391 21+00 93.1 82.3 100 8,232 22+00 71.5 35.8 43 1,538 22+43 0.0 TOTAL 74,205 6.0 SEDIMENT MONITORING Sediment monitoring was conducted in accordance with the permit requirements. The testing results are presented in Appendix 4 and a summary of the monitoring is presented below. Post Construction URS Corporation Southern (URS) conducted the laboratory testing of four (4) beach sampling locations, one every 500 feet along the placed fill, on behalf of the dredge contractor, Cavache, and Collier County. The results of the post-construction sampling indicate that all of the samples complied with the specifications for silt content and color. Two (2) of the stations, G-3 and R148+158', complied with the Shell Content Specification, 5% retained on the #4 sieve, while two (2) stations, R147+728' and R147+261', did not. Their values were 7.7% and 10.7%, respectively, for percent shell retained on the #4 sieve. The URS report depicts the material retained on the sieve, that being fine, broken shell fragments and small whole shells. Sediment Compliance Collier County conducted additional sampling and testing at 25-foot spacing in all directions (B denotes west, C denotes north, D denotes east, and E denotes south) from the two (2) stations, R147+728' and R147+261' as well as on station (denoted by A) for a total of five (5) samples per each station. The ten (10) samples exceeded the compliance standards exhibiting a range of 5.7% to 16.1% retained on the #4 sieve. Their report depicts the material retained on the sieve, that being fine, broken shell fragments and small whole shells. Native Beach Collier County conducted sampling and testing of the native beach sediment to quantify the shell content of the pre-project conditions. Six samples were taken landward of the fill limits, that is, between the landward limit of the placed fill and the existing dune, at approximate 250-foot intervals in the alongshore direction (denoted by Samples G through L), north of the rock groins. It is noted one (1) sample (denoted by Sample F — Station #148) was collected prior to commencement of construction between the two rock groins and tested at the same time as the other samples, for a total of seven (7) samples. The seven (7) samples exceeded the compliance standards exhibiting a range of 5.8%to 18.2%retained on the #4 sieve. 6 l,/- lc,LU I J South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 12 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report Summary Based on the results of the sediment testing, it is concluded that both the native beach and the placed fill from the permitted borrow area contain areas with higher shell content than the 5% retained on the #4 sieve standard. The range of the shell content within the placed fill is within the range of the shell content of the native beach for pre-project conditions. 7.0 CONCLUSION This report describes the completion of Collier County's 2013 South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project. The information presented herein provides the baseline data for both the County and FDEP to observe and assess, with quantitative measurements, the performance of the project, any adverse effects which have occurred, and the need for any adjustments, modifications, or mitigative response to the project. 1 12011111122 CC_Marco Island South BeachlReports111122 SouthMarco Island BeachRenourtshment Report-2013-08-07-final.docx 7 l,F1l-■JCpLCI I IUCI IL,Ll./1 J South Marco Island Beach Renourishment v111-3 13 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report APPENDIX 1 SURVEY REPORTS AND DATA DISK VF1l O .)LC111UCI I L,LV I J VIII-3 14 of 76 Surveyor's Report For Hyatt Survey#13-1752 Pre and Post R-Monument Surveys For South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Project Collier County,Florida Requested By: Cavache,Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL Prepared By: Hyatt Survey Services 11007 8th Avenue East Bradenton, Florida 34212 Phone#: (941) 748-4693 Licensed Business No. 7203 Ft a lett a/Al.oepteIIIL eI I L,GUI.) VIII-3 15 of 76 INTRODUCTION This is a hydrographic and topographic survey for pre- and post-fill operations on South Marco Island in Collier County, Florida. All survey data was collected in accordance with the construction specifications as provided by Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. Survey data was collected along 17 FDEP "R"monument profile lines. Upland data points were collected at a minimum of 10-foot increments and at all grade breaks along the specified profile with the hydrographic data collected at a minimum of 5-foot increments. Upland data collection began at a permanent structure or limits of vegetation and progressed seaward with the hydrographic data extending atleast 2,500 feet from the monment. All data points were collected with a combination of RTK GPS, conventional survey methods, and hydrographic survey methods. The fieldwork for these surveys was conducted from March 06, 2013 through April 26, 2013. The data was analyzed and processed on March 11, 2013 through May 1, 2013. Horizontal and Vertical Datum, Control Monumentation The scope of work required that all elevations are to be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) of 1988 and the horizontal positions are referenced to the North American Datum (NAD) of 1983 (1990 adjustment), State Plane Coordinates, Florida East Zone (0901). • Horizontal coordinates were derived by Hyatt Survey Services, Inc. from the EGPS VRS network, referenced to the North American Datum (NAD)of 1983 (2007 adjustment), State Plane Coordinates, Florida East Zone (0901) then adjusted to NAD 1983(90) using the NGS control points shown in the table below. The elevations are based on a benchmark provided by Marco Surveying and Mapping and is listed in the table below as well as #101 BM-126. SURVEY CONTROL TABLE NGS CONTROL POINTS NAD 83(90) FLORIDA EAST ZONE/NAVD 1988 DESIGNATION PID NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION LAMAR AC4857 601879.41 418189.44 N/A LAMAR AZ AC4856 601845.85 419805.04 N/A MARILYN AZ _ AC4855 596338.38 423972.57 N/A SECONDARY CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY HYATT SURVEY SERVICES, INC. DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION 100 SIRC 574501.49 420047.79 4.66 101 BM-126 574572.03 419802.67 3.78 1 1 I I I I O L,t%L JC�JICIIIUGI IL,LV IJ VIII-3 16 of 76 METHODS AND PROCEDURES Hydrographic Survey: The hydrographic survey data was collected using either an Odom Hydrotrac with a 200 kHz transducer or an Odom ES3 Multibeam transducer, both aided by a TSS DMS-25 motion compensator. Horizontal positioning was obtained using a Trimble SPS 461 position and heading sensor with the real-time tide corrections. Tide values were checked daily with a tide mark set at the project site and the motion compensator was calibrated daily at the boat launch, as well. The sound velocity profile was determined with an Odom Digibar Pro and verified via a standard bar check. The hydrographic data was processed in Coastal Oceanographic "Hypack MAX"software. Topographic Survey: The topographic data was collected with Trimble 5700 and 5800 dual frequency GPS systems and conventional instrumentation with automated data collection(Trimble Survey Controller). All maps for this project were generated with AutoCAD 2012 PC software. PROJECT NOTES Delays: None to note. Rights of Entry: None required. Project Issues: None to note. CERTIFICATION This is to certify that this report and survey have been performed in accordance with the Minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Surveyors and Mappers per Florida Administrative Code 5J-17 and USACOE Hydrographic Manual. The map associated with this report is by reference made a part hereof and the map is not valid without this report and vice versa. Signed ,, Date: // °r ��-- Travis. D./ark, P.S.M No 6731 r *Not valid unless signed and sealed by a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper* t 1 L0 L,oCf1tCIIluCI IL,GU IJ VIII-3 17 of 76 Surveyor's Report For Hyatt Survey#13-1752 Pre and Post Borrow Area Surveys For South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Project Collier County, Florida Requested By: Cavache,Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL Prepared By: Hyatt Survey Services 11007 8th Avenue East Bradenton, Florida 34212 Phone#: (941) 748-4693 Licensed Business No. 7203 1 1 fait L/W JCpICIIIVCI IL,LU IJ VIII-3 18 of 76 INTRODUCTION This is a hydrographic survey for before and after dredge operations in the borrow area for the South Marco Island beach fill project in Collier County, Florida. All survey data was collected in accordance with the construction specifications as provided by Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. Survey data was collect on 100 foot intervals perpendicular to the project baseline extending 400 feet outside the borrow area limits where possible, as well as three profile lines parallel to the project baseline equidistance across the width of the borrow area. Survey data was collected at a minimum of five(5) foot increments along the survey lines and all data points were collected via hydrographic survey methods. The fieldwork for the before dredge survey was conducted on February 25, 2013 and the after dredge survey was conducted on April 29, 2013. The data was analyzed and processed on February 26, 2013 and April 30, 2013 respectively. Horizontal and Vertical Datum,Control Monumentation The scope of work required that all elevations are to be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD)of 1988 and the horizontal positions are referenced to the North American Datum (NAD) of 1983 (1990 adjustment), State Plane Coordinates, Florida East Zone (0901). Horizontal coordinates were derived by Hyatt Survey Services, Inc. from the EGPS VRS network, referenced to the North American Datum (NAD)of 1983 (2007 adjustment), State Plane Coordinates, Florida East Zone (0901) then adjusted to NAD 1983(90) using the NGS control points shown in the table below. The elevations are based on a benchmark provided by Marco Surveying and Mapping and is listed in the table below as well as#101 BM-126. SURVEY CONTROL TABLE NGS CONTROL POINTS NAD 83(90)FLORIDA EAST ZONE/NAVD 1988 DESIGNATION PID NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION LAMAR AC4857 601879.41 418189.44 N/A LAMAR AZ AC4856 601845.85 419805.04 N/A MARILYN AZ AC4855 596338.38 423972.57 N/A SECONDARY CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY HYATT SURVEY SERVICES,INC. DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION 100 SIRC 574501.49 420047.79 4.66 101 BM-126 574572.03 419802.67 3.78 t t ' JepLe111'Jul I L,LU I. VIII-3 19 of 76 METHODS AND PROCEDURES Hvdrozrauhic Survey: The hydrographic survey data was collected using either an Odom Hydrotrac with a 200 kHz transducer or an Odom ES3 Multibeam transducer, both aided by a TSS DMS-25 motion compensator. Horizontal positioning was obtained using a Trimble SPS 461 position and heading sensor with the real-time tide corrections. Tide values were checked daily with a tide mark set at the project boat launch and the motion compensator was calibrated daily at the boat launch as well. The sound velocity profile was determined with an Odom Digibar Pro and verified via a standard bar check. The hydrographic data was processed in Coastal Oceanographic "Hypack" software version 2012. All ASCII files for this survey were generated with "Hypack"version 2012 PC software. PROJECT NOTES Delays: None to note. Rights of Entry: None required. Project issues: Not all survey lines were able to be surveyed 400 feet past the borrow area limits due the presence of a rock jetty, seawall, and a wooden dock within the extended survey area. CERTIFICATION This is to certify that this report and survey have been performed in accordance with the Minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Surveyors and Mappers per Florida Administrative Code 5J-17 and USACOE Hydrographic Manual. The map associated with this report is by reference made a part hereof and the map is not valid without this report and vice versa. /� Signed '`� ' Date: /°7 'f l r:}w is D. Part . P. ;.M No. 6731 No vaWd unless sighed and sealed by a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper* t t taatt 4 %. Mr OCIlLCII IUCI I c,Lt)l South Marco Island Beach Renourishment VIII-3 20 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report APPENDIX 2 FILL AREA PROFILES A'iJ r— y . ' ''';`;'" -''''',,s'.', ,. ,,, ' .. , — l': .., 'NN „ . . 0. v..i'•';'..:' , ; hA h• � 60 g A V6 , % •h ',b� $ • L 4 :bpA,'6 • ' • , • •-• ,, >ia900 • ti 59 .,. A6•: s. h43 r ';J .4 �'' !'' . r *`r -.; ` max . l' a s �* • ,eiT"t: At n . ' - -7.2 -9.2 TO • .6.'6 9 -9.7 -10.3 - 1. .8. -10.8 -11.1 /` A 6 -11.7 1121,; ig11 0A '6 - 1•• 1p�2 ..-c‘,. 1 3 -12.5 116- g1 -12.5-12.9 -12.6 -13.1 -12.8 31 , -13.11 -12.7 ' .112 ,5 -132 -12.7 112 13.2 -12.9 -1 2A - -13.2 -12,6 -11623 L-/ -1 -13.5 -12.7 12. 3 1134 -130 24 -13.8 -13.2 12A • -13.6 -12.9 ..12----a -13.5 -12.8 12. -13.7 -13.0 ..1'2,-C, -13.6 -13.4 12.1 -13.7 -13.5 .121 -13.8 .13.3 1�•-� 137 _13.2 __ -126 -13.8 -13.3 12•9 -13.8 -13.1 12. -13 9 -13.4 12 8 -13.8 -13.4 126 -13.9 -13.7 126 -13.8 -13.4 12• -13.8 -13.6 126 13.9 13.5 1 5 _+2' -13.7 1121 �--14.0 -13.6 1223 -14.2. ' -�__ -13.5 12 -14,3 -13.6 A'2,4 A -14.2 --...."""" a 13.E 12 12• --14.o "12 5 12 -143 - - _12A -14.3 0 1 14.5 4.0 4.4 ' -14.1 • . . OPIPP7: 7irli-00'. .. 1 --:. -- , . ..., ,,...... _. _ . .. ..., . . ..- - ..... ---,•-•,- A ---. i ... :- . - _ • • A - ,,, --'....• 1,, , -, .,.... r . , . -- - s.\ . \- ,,r1.'40, • ' :.. ,. . ..., '.5... ? -,■-... , . '•••'.. 1,xe-- - .. , . • . - ' -- ,,,„-,-, .......-,- •-- tlik,-it•;. 'Tr •':::: '-. .„.. , ,.,.',„...,y.',:4,'„4,e'..:: - - -: '.-tra . : ^ '.--°-",":;;* _-.`' '-'1,0"9' -, - , -` , -'7;._:____-,t:------" -5,9 ■;',• '-- ','..'4' - '-'" - .--:',.':". . 1 1, .1 .10.8: ___ 11.5 ■A`'`,,,,,,,,,-4.- -• ....„,,,00.4 "-----. -,, ` -.. . ',,,,.' ''..',- ' _6.8 _1 I 12.4 09.-- ,.•.„-,e 01;1 .10.6 9 -11 __. ____-.--- -------- -12.8 -12.8 -12.7 ,,- --'.. .f.X.T•ei 6 _11. __ .-, - 4 ' .3 -10.9 -128 -13.4 -11.5 -1'2 7 • -13.2 -11.7 -12.8 -13.3 -52.5 ;13.0 -13.4 -13.5 -13.5 -13.1 . -12.7 -13.5-13.1 ___.,-... „._,-.... -13.5 -12.7 . -13.1 -13.5 __-- -12-8 -132 -13.6 ___-..... -12.8 -13.0 -13.6 -13.3 -13.6 -12.9 -132 -13.6 -12.9 -13.3 2 -13.9 -12-9 -13.3 -13.5-13.6 -12.8 - 34 -13.8 12.9 .4 -13.8 -13.3 -12.7 -13.2 -13.•200-000000C- -12.7 -13A _ . :• -12.8 -13.3 -14 II ;128 _A3.4 -12.9 _,‘3,4 -13• -12.8 _13.3 -12.8 -13.5 -13.8 -12.7 A3,4 -12 9 _A3.4 _12.9 _13.4 -12 9 -13.5 -13.1 -13.1 -13.3 -132 -13.2 _13.4 -13A -133 -13.4 -13.1 -13.5 ' . . , .1,, • .....„," , .4g7-,,,.,1 l'' \\ -\ ool'. ^ A3 0 le .12.2 :1-:13111.111".9.I..1:33..1...24 (S)NOLLVA313 C31)NOI1VA313 C14)NOI1VA313 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iii' : ,, to v) • N N N l O to `- W W J J I1.1 D N t i Q 2 Q 2p a o g 0 K v Diii 8 J — 1 e 1p11°o 8 ° 8 8o 8 8 10 8 ° $ Sao Wl1Va 8864 UAVN Wl1Va 8864 GAVN WfllVa 8864 aAVN (111)NOI1VA313 ('u)NOI1VA313 (11)NOI1VA313 o 0 0 o 0 0 i + + o N N N i 0 — 1 0 N N N 0 p 0 Un 2 i i Z _ __._U) �- w — w — J L1.1 D w W j J L Nll OZ 1.1 0 Lo LT_ YO Z YQ Z 00 CL §2 tr g2 cC C a o 2 a 0 m a o 0 0 0 o _ 0 - ---++ : TI o 8 _ ° R0 8 • ° 8 R$ 11f11Va 8864 UAVN NUIiVa 8864 UAVN Wf11Va 8864 CIAVN (11)NOIIVA313 ('8)NOI1VA313 (11)NOI1VA313 IIMMIIMMINIMINIMIllik 0 0 -- 0+ N 0 0 + 0 N 0 0 1 1 1 - 1 Z W0 co LL Z O Q. o 2 o 0 + o CC ....Thi) . LL O O o 0 0 g FS mo wawa 8861 aAVN ('8)N011VA313 o 0 o 0 0 N N i O 0 • + + 1 0 0 N N I 0 0 l'. ..._... Z _- _. Z W W r>� W0 W W7 �O ZO �p Z �O 2 FL Q. I 0 2 Cl- 0 2 d 0 o K o u.) to °o I °o ' f IC4)- .. . wniva 8861 UAVN wf11Va 8861 QAVN wf11Va 9861 aAVN ('8)NOIIVA313 (1!)NOIIVA313 (.14)NOI1VA313 l•/-XL.JCEIICI I IUCI IL,LU I South Marco Island Beach Renourishment v111-3 27 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report APPENDIX 3 DREDGE AREA CROSS SECTIONS a a o o I x I I I I I I I n+00 u 8 0 0 0 8 8 CO O I 1 1 1 1 1 I 12+00 it 8 0 8 I o 8 O I Im I I I ( 1 13+00 + o 8 0 8 8 1 0 0 _ 14+00 I I I I I I Cro g o . o I 1� I I 1 I 1 1 u+00 U o 0 8 o I o 0 • 1 1 I I I I I 16+00 NI u o a o 8 0 0 I 1 1- 1 I I I 12+00 Ai 0 8 8 I o 8 'Ai fa og I I I I I I 42 is+00 Nro ° o 0 0 0 + °0 42 to I o a •I I I I I 19+00 w I I R U 8 0 0 8 a o 1_, I�, lO l0 I '0 \ I 20+000 • •0 • A •I I I I I I _ 21+00 . 1:, o 0 O o o \ o p. \ I I I I 1 22+00 w °nm �xi.Y4 v 0 8 8 8 crow m2 C"2 Z o a+.t t; ti.4b I I 1 l+ 24+00 Nldd 4 8 a 8 a 53 0 o m , m , !, r K 1 I I 25+00 ap° 8 o m 2 Z 2° ° °°a _ w v o 2s+00 II z C n w; ° o • ` g E 1 1 1 n ' ° p ;i8° s .' a > '' ° wro o o '1 A p = JJ g's$ '°s'.2 Z .°l 8 o as w z 3 A o Z q ao t _ o _ u w o i r y x m@ y a = if 0 8 c� a 3 - • a o •'§',..' I W g II p c...(1) C •->-0,"o _ o - _ 3 u ° o 28+00 . w r ~ m o aw a s o w 4 p p = t sz E. A % _ ro a 1i i y°a o ‘gill fi_ S 'a_co 2 o Q O ), '4'.u.„:-,,,x: ? 3 a 1 N O � _. o a 7 o o w o )0 (7 'u o° ° ra 8 @ ° _ 3 Is 3 zing.. 00 �T1 a m cw w a o O Q n 01 - my Z z12+00'- n o m 12+00'- ox h 3 v 12+50'- ,I,,; X712+50"- �l i T O 13+00'- W N 0 13+00 C ' O C R1 13+50'- C 13+50'- O Z �� Z 14+00 (n co 14+00"- n cb C' 1. 14+50'- m � i l — 14+50'- r- 141 Z 15+00'- �y� n n115+00'- V15+50'- I� II CO O 1,15+50'- � � 0 O 0 16+00'- Z 16+00'- 0 O 016+50'- 4-16+50'- O 0 O p 17+00'- 17+00'- 17+50'- ! 17+50'- I i 18+00'- 18+00'- I I I 18+50'- 18+50'- 19+00'- I 19100'- I i 19+50'- 19+50'- 1 20+00'- 20+00'- 20+50'- 20+50'- 21+00 21+00 21+50'- 21+50'- I 22+00'- 22+00'- »m 22+50'- i o 22+50'- a i3 23+00'- $° 23+00 �n 1 z WC()s 23150"- , 23+50 z $ Np° '40,1 fi1(� G 1 u "- n.,4 _ Ate, °m �� »...♦� 24+00'- 24+00' PmoP _: / / A*41'1;1--7 pUpp (( 9\}}\'y -2 24+50'- 24+50'- AVIdd 25+00'- 25+00'- i N m 25+50'- 25+50' I o Z' y a m V v p U �' 26+00"- 26+00'- \ § rn ;N °R�.. ° w°° aue a q ' - :a Et n ° '^ m Z '± _ o °g _ 'a_ 26+50'- 26+50'- \ t q: Z O 8 - » boa n `° O 0 Ri ° 3 ' "> a wn E 27+00'- 27+00'- 0 ^ -I g g° .4 ' ° 1 Z N^ I 27+50'- 27+50' c) ° v Ji OR go- " 24 z 3 8M N o a c ---i T ti » u _ o z e ' _ CO n 'w 3 a ; � ° 28+50'- 28+50'- Nogu Co OOC) c _ 2E' _ 3 20. C ` _ . w --i "2, ° s ° i 29+00'- 29+00'- " O = - 3 t ° 3 e ' n `' u3 n o 3 m n y°a o o -- _ vi d 29+50'- 29+50'-OD o w o j C) 1 4 " a ° 3 30+00'- 30+00'- N I 4d a -. o w S 1 cn $ ' t ° 30+50'-t E rn g • o ` - v v -oO q V ov i O O O O- p O^V 1 � I 0 O O O w p O <O O O O O O O ELEV, F7. NAVD ELEV., FT. NAVD I 1 I I 1 N I N 1 ri- 0 1 1 I I 1 sv 0 0 I O O I I o O Q_ i O_ O O O a n rn ° C)C) a C m Z m o- m Z o Z o o f not us = ti � _ c O _ 0,--. --7 n1 o- oo - ° N3 0 n1 P Co C's °° n O a c r- w c w A � g- n -1 ' n `Z g U) , � m� g v) + a w � n O o • P) O o I !,lam O II ' 0 +• _., II RO l O A s II r1 a-m o- . O`O 7`O `°O o, > a s3 Z Z O— N Z O- o o co 0. I N co° (J)— I (c O—(o O RCQ rn 7 //i SG N G -m SS g � 2 L o- o g¢ \4 + '2 i*Aii�1 44 DNad _o a z o n o - o- aTT e m .. s. a N . I-- c N tM de N s° 4,3 a o s = Ma 8_ (0 > n B �& ° _ a ° - ° _ a - - ° 3 - Ng o O 0 o °a ° .- '' — 0 �l 1:-: "°° a ,` = v Z 1i 2 T�T OT n _ ° % a ° _ 8 _ _ > p° _ 2(°- °o- n m O n N O R' u$ 3 i S. s .°T ° , C (n % E _ i = o ' U_ (`Ds_ I o ''„ O O _ CO " w 4 ° °a S i x " a - - Z az g4 2 Y ! c R 3 ii ° � -',1, n o t� 3 = _q a n Z c) „° 2"; . V a ; w 0 s_ v .2. 2, 4. °-' 1 g I O c �a ` 3 -° - g Os °. r y A ° - 3 ° 2 9.w � O = as g a 3 o a ∎ NCO - . a a 0 z n (-1 b -4., a - to 0 - TT ° o t o (1„ 0 1N n o 3 �' n (., is ''I = °o ° e. 3 I N u 8 4 W O, o • N 1 N � O o o- - o o— o— — o 1 00 o 0 0 I rn vV th- o— o 1 .o 0 0 1 1 I 0 0 0 ELEV., FT. NAVD ELEV., FT. NAVD N ' I I N I O (n O Ut O U O U t ; 1 I I 1 I _' p- o- f 1 O O 1 1 o O- I 1 8— O- O O 1 I' (A— (A- °. O O O D 0 Z °- N3 II n o Z ill n III wn O - + O - O g N 2 S • 3 2 ,, oa `O' O m (n o cu 111 o o m (i) I :' n r T o �� D r 2 I r - u;-..= r -1 0 ; "n � r O y � u) Rlr O —I•O m u O A � - 0- I O -11 o -,1 r.II t 0+' II A IIm _ o- m(r) o o '• o" v) -O O Z o- 0 Z o— .. Z 0 0 O CO C - a (n sJJpRCp s c) o m Co o wo '- r rn AagU$° o°'S 42; \ � Nidd' _ I (ii_ ( 0 0 I n o °o- °o- aZ n 7.1 s� ° r 3p T,:c 3 d > s : 0 (o°i_ co 1 1 s a [-II o` c0 - o o- g m m Z $' g 3i gag.°R R - %'E'r e m z n` z 1n On s„ a a a - °o— 00_ T T a a D m O O N O RS 3 a ,� u t to ap vZ (-) °s.o Q 6 r ° a ? n. a 0 ° A O °° '.2 2 0 0 _ _ o„ a v° z a° nt - , 0 4 3 u A m v. f Z Z D tz 30 0 ° 1 e y 3 F 3 ' y� x �o r ¢ ° Z 4 (n ° v _ ' 8 >' L'-'- m� g11' 0 c >a s � 3 ? j ' #, o o °. -"Ti C - o a z W 6O = as a 3+ 5 ! m M o A � � g a a a z a a ° z i F ° Y b )> _ ,, ; °a t� a 0 0 o W o �(� 3 3 j 3 N U (� , o mO a a o t C I ( ‹.....' NJ O o NJ 1 ONi the. O— O ^^ O co O O v(V\ co co ` 0 q O o co I O o I o O o ELEV., FT. NAVD N I O cn O cn O N _ I I N I I I 1. I. O O 1` I O O— O O I o— o p_ v° N O W ro3 O )=. \ oa �_, 1 Go n 8-_ /Z O Z O Z• O O Oni ca -1 o )0N --I o N O O -D-- n Z O O T00— f N Z 00- (1) �^- r- O (n- -I °- r� I— C -I °- O o_ 0 o_ 0 A II, II 0 A o— O o G)• u, O G) cn o CO 03 a N MpRCO m o— m o 3. a Z p — 0— e N Uom "v , ,� ni ni j A"m ' O A _ m _ - " 9PIIdd� o— I o " " r n o 0 0 00 co a w ti Si ; °ao »� °tea a a _ b o— o— o n 2 Z "o a.'. .. R $ 3 No II= •- C a' b t2 a s _ °— 0 n n 0' ' ,3 0 a3 3 s - a cog —i ;o ..g =' z roa O O 0 = � $° a - a ; a o x " o n ' f 2 8 3 N. A 13 r- z Z D dz y if ° .`1'. $ o O " � O � ° n t 3 ' ti -O n o n < w Z cj Fo aq a ± J a w o W - 0 co v, s. 3 a g 1 g II 00 c - _ . _ o a o - r A - o - 3 z w 0 -tirnz •,-;. i o 3 tn CI F TO 2 �2 0 A W u� o s Z m a PZQ p =.a" a a D Z " � � o o a t o w o �� CT} 3 3 d R O rn ot c.' U ae Z$ - i n m 0, a -1 o_ ,m I- N v I 1 1 I ° N3 v o0 1 1 1 - o- w °o ELEV., FT. NA' • i I o N N O Cr. 0 U 0 00 N II `v II N 1 00 I Cr) O o... o 0 O Yz 3 00 o_ va ° o- fo 1 Nti o m o . i _ — o - U �1 o z °-I 1 1 I v oy o— : N2 00— 1 ^'3 o iu O 1 w O - N • O- -i O o N- TI o O Q... I Z o- c A O m O \. n1 O O U p— 00- O I 0- I O RC S AMA 0 `,.°,,JC34 191FIKI:11 uSw ) 'Z m.. 2 2 7: C>�1r; i , 1�� 9NlaaV. = Ar,.. o Z• § &y a4 'a- a° a = _ ox M a o m = Z l' Hy vl ^ 2^ w g» - 31 No $ p- ' �T TOT ,R �a Fa ' n∎ • m 0 N N O ., n 3 _ 3 ? n e" i i Y .' E a 3 ° °a b OZ ( )) 8° 1. q, rrl r p ' I ! C _ - _ 3 Z ' 2 A o 4; g '8H0. '-C Cl o - 3 ° 2 x o b O ue N ' 1 a s m 3 1 o Y n a o TT� b o 8 o W o N n 3 3 d a o� O _ o � 1(‘.1 U -L zQ O U F 0, W = o p, 3 0 IJHL.i JCEJLCI I WC! IL,LV I 0 South Marco Island Beach Renourishment V10-3 34 of 76 2013 Post-Construction Report APPENDIX 4 SEDIMENT TESTING RESULTS 1..t11•otpieiIIVei 1L,LV 10 VIII-3 35 of 76 URS Corpor..t oil:�rtutIirrm May 3, 2013 Mr. Michael Poff, P.E. Vice-President of Engineering Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. Naples, Florida 34104 Re: Joint Coastal Permit -DRAFT South.Marco Island Beach Nourishment Permit No. 0235209-001-JC Sediment Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Construction Berm Sample Testing Job#38619-420 Dear Mr. Poff: Please find attached the results of grain size testing for the initial Construction Berm Sample taken to date for the subject project. The beach berm sand samples were sampled by others and were reportedly obtained from a minimum depth of 18 inches within the limits of the in-progress constructed berm. Samples were procured in the field by a representative of the Cavache, Inc. dredging company and delivered to URS. URS mixed and quartered/split the received samples and then forwarded half of the delivered sample to a certified testing laboratory, Radise International Inc. (RAD) for testing. The remaining half sample was forwarded to the Coastal Zone Management Division in Collier Conty. Testing included grain sized distribution testing per ASTM D422-63 (Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils), fines content determination per ASTM D1140 (Standard Test Method for Amount of Material in Soils finer than No. 200 Sieve) and classification per ASTM D2487 (Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes). Additionally the Munsell Color Value designations were determined for the sample. Compliance criteria for the project are provided in Table 1 of the contract Sediment Quality assurance/Quality Control Plan as follows: Table 1- Sediment Compliance Specifications Sediment Parameter Parameter Definition Compliance Value Max. Silt Content Passing#230 sieve 5% Max. Shell Content* Retained on#4 sieve 5% Munsell Color Value Moist Value (chroma= 1) 6 or lighter The beach fill material shall not contain construction debris, toxic material, other foreign matter, coarse gravel or rocks. *Shell Content is used as the indicator of fine gravel content for the implementation of quality control/quality assurance procedures. Page 1 of 3 ouptc111UC1 IL,LU 10 VIII-3 36 of 76 IntaS COrpordion„oulht'rn Included in the following Table 2 is a listing of completed Sediment Sampling and Testing results performed for the project as of the date of this report. Compliance with the stipulated Compliance Criteria from Table 1 above is indicated as a Pass (P) or Fail (F) designation in the Table. Table 2: Summat 7 Table of Sediment Sam le Testin Sample Date of Location Soil Mean Grain Silt Shell Munsell Pass(P) No, Sample RMP Line* Size (mm) Content Content Color or Class. (%) (%) Fail(F) 1 3.22.13 G-3 SP 0.43 3.4 4.6 5YR P(1) 8/2 2 4.09.13 R148 + 158' SP 0.27 2.3 3.5 5YR P(1) 8/2 3 4.19.13 R147 +728' SP 1.17 1.9 7.7 5YR F(2) 8/2 4 4.19.13 R147+261' SP 1.31 0.8 10.7 5YR F(2) 8/2 TBD *See backup RAD test report for coordinate locations. (1) Sample was visually inspected and was found not to contain any construction debris, toxic material, other foreign matter, coarse gravel or rocks. (2) Sample contains>5%shell content. As indicated by the testing, samples#3 and #4 were designated as a failing test per the stipulated Table 1 criteria. Material retained on the#4 US Standard sieve exceeded the 5%maximum criteria due to the natural shell content of the sand in the approved project borrow source area. Photographs of the material retained on the#4 sieve for samples #3 and#4 are attached. The photographs clearly show the shell nature of the coarser berm fill material. oOo URS appreciates the opportunity to have been of service on this contract. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned engineer. Respectfully submitted ,0111111///,, \ frCtANC/S / `- 43 • kiA44#0 - ,* "/• •ATE OF • �J Thomas F. Mullin, P.E., V.P. , ;'[y Manager of Geotechnical Services Division „.�,,� Boca Raton, FL Office �/� , `` ����� 561-862-1070 Direct ////I I l 111\\\ 561-994-6500 Ofc Page 2 of 3 %-•/-% op1C111um1 I L,LV I VIII-3 37 of 76 URS Corporation Soultior11 561-239-8795 CP thomas.l;nwilin cus.coin Attachment: 1). Radise International Test Report—Construction Berm Samples #2, #3 and #4 (6 Pages) 2). Photographs of coarse (>#4 Sieve) grain size shell material c: Cavache, Inc. Page 3 of 3 %m..ocinemtuei IL,LU 1 J VIII-3 38 of 76 (111-DISE 'tnh.prociwe Ln�Mcen•Eo11R�rt Danloput) SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Project name:: South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Sample Description: Tan fine to medium SAND,some shell fragments Sample Reference: FDEP Reference Monument Profile mine:R 148+ 158 State Plane: 573835.118 N.745275.888 E Sample Identification: Construction Berm Sample 412 Sample Date: Tuesday,April 09,2013 Tested By: Sasi A'ithi Sieve Opening Sieve No. (mm) 0 Percent Passing 3/41 19 -4.19 100 5/8" 16 -4.0 100 3.5 5.66 -2.4 96.8 4 4.76 -2.2 96.5 5 4 -2.0 95.4 7 2.83 -1.5 92.4 10 2 -1.0 91.2 14 1.41 -0.5 89 18 1 0 87.1 25 0.71 0.5 85.6 35 0.5 1.0 84 45 0.35 1.5 80.1 60 0.25 2.0 76.3 80 0.177 2.5 69.2 120 0.125 3.0 8.2 170 0.088 3.5 2.6 200 0.075 3.75 2.3 230 0.0625 4.0 2 1 Shell Content (%): 3.5 Carbonate Content(%): 37.5 (Vlunsell Color Value: SYR 8/2 Notes: Testing performed General accordance with ASTM D 422,01140 and D 2487 Sincerely, s%0:1 NGHY(j°"or,, RADISE � +``i,,,. GeotechnIea .$fjrareC nsulIents� �L^ • 52845 Kumar A ,MATE O:; Florida Rdpitajtog No.5285 t 4•11.uNAL t-17,0 1_.f1\i JCi)LC111UI IL,GUI J VIII-3 39 of 76 �,,..-._ GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION FRADISE CLIENT_URS _ — PROJECT NAME South Marco Island Beach Nourishment PROJECT NUMBER P101005-S PROJECT LOCATION COLLIER COUNTY,FL _ U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 4 3 2 1.5 1 13181311118111416 20 30 40 60 60 100140200 19° Ile IIIIII i■ ■ I 1 ii ■ it 8: ■■ 1 ■■ �' i — 1 ■__ 80 11U111 75 L.I II Iii1■� I I - - ----_-- 70 ■ II 1 ■ I IIi1■` I ■.111.1. 6' i ■ llii■■IIi'JiIiIIiuii I ■■ U � E or0 w J� I 111111111 w 111111 I ii � — 30 I JUl ■ II 2 F- ii f 1117 II 1 1 it ■■ 1ir■ _ 15 Ill I!:_ I1 III1 ■■ I 1_10 _ 1 1 ■ II 5 i i i ■ ■ ,1, . 0 100 10 1 0.1 0 01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse 1 tine coarse I medium I fine 0 c9 3 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu • Sample#2 0.0 POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) 0.94 1.33 0 0 o P D m o Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay • Sample#2 0.0 16 0.17 0.14 0.13 3.5 94.2 2.3 ? D84 D50 D16 Graphic Mean=0.27mm 0.5 0.16 0.14 N 2 Kg L.m,oeplellfuel I L,Lu I J VIII-3 40 of 76 iIAIsE IlnhawatImo rmemaa•Sonlaa Duels SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Project name:: South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Sample Description: Tan fine to medium SAND,some shell fragments Sample Reference: FDEP Reference Monument Profile Line:R 147+728 State Plane: 5741 19,734 N,745237.499 F Sample Identification: Construction Berm Sample#3 Sample Date: Friday,April 19,2013 Tested By: Sasi Ayithi Sieve Steve ing teve No. 0 (mm) Percent Passing 3/4" 19 -4.19 100 5/8" 16 -4.0 99.5 3.5 5.66 -2.4 93.4 4 4.76 -2.2 92.3 5 4 -2.0 90.1 7 2.83 -1.5 82.6 10 2 -1.0 80 - 14 1.41 -0.5 74.1 18 1 0 69.1 25 0.71 0.5 65.7 35 0.5 1.0 62.3 45 0.35 1.5 56.5 60 0.25 2.0 53 80 0.177 2.5 21.3 120 0.125 3.0 4.7 170 0.088 3.5 2.1 200 0.075 3.75 1.9 230 0.0625 4.0 1.7 Shell Content(%): 7.7 Carbonate Content (%): 41 Munsell Color Value: SYR 8/2 Notes: Testing performed General accordance with ASTM D 422,01140 and 0 2487 Sincerely, �% � "pCHYV 1#,, RADISE 1n ter Pi) i '' �t�:�C 4-/,'so Geotechnical d•bp`it�ga}e Consultants - T No_.,52845 0. r\ F tf) X113 :r r Kumar A. 0. P. Florida Reg oii'No.5284 4, �IP0.'.( 0A10 ;:�•�•�e l.41li oepw111utl1 IL,LV I0 VIII-3 41 of 76 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION IiiillSE RAOISE CLIENT URS PROJECT NAME South Marco Island Beach Nourishment PROJECT NUMBER P101005-S PROJECT LOCATION COLLIER COUNTY,FL U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 8 4 3 2 1.5 1 • . 1/23/8 3 4 6 810 1418 20 30 40 60 60 100 140 200 100 95 '1�� ��' 90 --- '1 1 85 80---- "IMIIIIIIIIIIIIHLIIIIIIIIMIIIIII 75 ' 70 I ' 1 65 - 60 I :11111111111 tug 55 I I _ - Z ILI 50 O 45- �q a 40 n I II 35-- 0 I 30 1 all 25 20— 1 ' iliil�� ■'I 15 II!10— 5 � 0 If 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS M 5 COBBLES GRAVEL _ SAND coarse-1 fine coarse medium fine SILT OR CLAY O 5 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL Pt Cc Cu S • Sample#3 0.0 POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) 0.62 3.11 u . 0 P m_ F, Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 010 %Gravel %Sand %Silt 1 %Clay N • Sample#3 0.0 19 0.43 0.19 0.14 7.7 90.4 1.9 I D84 050 D16 Graphic Mean=1.17mm 3.1 0.24 0.17 N o Lot-1%r Jel/LCI I ILI l IL,GU I J VIII-3 42 of 76 liaiSE PrONOwlua Erytn.en.S H,.ue Deraci r.l SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Project name:: South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Sample Description: Tan fine to medium SAND,some shell fragments Sample Reference: FDEP Reference Monument Profile Line:R 147+261 State Plane: 574586.141 N,745230.51013 Sample Identification: Construction Berm Sample#4 Sample Date: Friday,April 19,2013 Tested By: Sasi Ayithi Sieve No. Sieve Opening (mm) 0 Percent Passing 1° 25.4 -8.0 100 3/4° 19 -4.19 99 5/811 16 -4.0 97.9 3.5 5.66 -2.4 90.3 4 4.76 -2.2 89.3 5 4 -2.0 87.4 7 2.83 -1.5 79.9 1 10 2 -1.0 77.1 14 1.41 -0,5 71.1 18 1 0 66 25 0.71 0.5 62.2 35 0.5 1.0 58.8 45 0.35 1.5 53.5 60 0.25 2.0 50 80 0.177 2.5 17.9 120 0.125 3.0 4.5 170 0.088 3.5 1 200 0.075 3.75 0.8 230 0.0625 4.0 0.7 Shell Content(%): 10.7 Carbonate Content(%): 39 Munsell Color Value: 5YR 8/2 Notes: Testing performed General accordance with ASTM D 422,D1140 and 0 2487 Sincerely, ��fOlI C H%' Sgi0i RADISE 4 fi`�`rp►tt ,St.14 o� Geotechni iOVLh'iarrP nsuilents� / 1\4.6 41/ ' N©.845 } a j • %► 1 7ti l j 1 r Kumar � h Florida R'q at, ,ri No 521184450 1 41 -oPoS< OR1p'.'•'' `®e 0 1■/14 JGI11G1111/G1 IL,LV I J VIII-3 43 of 76 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION 1IDISE RADISE CLIENT URS PROJECT NAME South Marco Island Beach Nourishment PROJECT NUMBER P101005-S PROJECT LOCATION COLLIER COUNTY.Ft. U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 8 4 3 2 1.5 1/2318 3 4 6 810 1418 20 30 40 50 60 100140200 100' I 17 /4 II I I I II I I I I 95 - -----_ .._ - 90— ---- • 85 -_.. . 80 .- ----- 75 --- . , r - - 70, - ---_ 65-' , , - 60 1. , m 55 - - . re LL 45 _� ._ - w 40. _-_ . w a ` 30 - 1 ^�_ _ 25 - •— , • 20 • 15 -•- , 10 --- 5 --- - - -_ 0 M. 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS M 5 COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse I fine coarse! medium I fine 0 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu g • Sample#4 0.0 POORLY GRADED SAND(SP) 0.50 3.92 z a 0 r o Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt 1 %Clay El • Sample#4 0.0 25.4 0.57 0.2 0.14 10.7 88.5 0.8 z i D84 D50 D16 W Graphic Mean=1.31mm 3.5 0.25 0.18 u N 3 g ■ Y1■,oupte1111JC1 IL,LV I � ,SF,' GM M"'= ■ S 1 v'_ �y s, ,,, r, 4/11,ill " 1:, l¢ itb 41k rte,,., �' N� . met, sby',• S 5 1 1 it ' ► ;, e ,".;� `4 4 �' r _ 7` �. , tom.. .f r. • • Ip jit Li, ,i, .. r if., ♦ 1 t "i `+ r ^w • .. r.:4''''''''''.14$4,' \ fr '' . *''',H. ' 4' r4 . #.. ..: .. . . . _ ., : , . ,,,,,, , ,.. , ,,,...,,,. . I, .,:,.... ..'. -,N,. .„.,....,....,,-,.,.„..-.:. '"''' '. l', 'f. i„ll. , ,1,- :1,0.. _...,,'.J' �' ,'mr-ttr rte- qe; ,._, .... ....wA,.. .:. .' • ,.,...., .. , N e d ' f Y . , Wcwrt±.y, r-; OroMelvdaY 1 SahwrM� ... ;, .'14.4'E ' ,. 5 st fi ? w;fit ��mtt 4 _ r , .. r 1 t.,fl■.•JG'J teI IIVGI IL,LV I 4 rr r . If \- m `i Y II .ak IF 44. r, ► *-. 6 r j .- ''' 4 '', 4) Airom.--44'4,. r F R« T m .,.� r -e NIt r.! 7. .... -..e / I t r 6 ,, 1— 4 -- k Y.. , K µ , ! r t 'Ad d 4 9 L.Y11..oepicIIIVCI ILA GV IJ VIII-3 46 of 76 °'- & Associates, Inc. imiAlGeotechnical,Environmental and Materials Consultants Ardaman Project No. 13-32-4039 23-MAY-2013 TO: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Natural Resource Department Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Attention: Mr. Clint Perryman SUBJECT: Report of Sediment Compliance Criteria Testing South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Collier County, Florida Dear Clint: We received 10 samples of sand labeled 147+260 A through E and 147+730 A through E. We tested each sample to determine if the sand meets the project compliance criteria of maximum 5 percent silt content (passing the No. 230 sieve), maximum 5 percent shell content (retained on the No. 4 sieve) and Munsell Color Value of 6 or lighter. The results of the sieve analysis performed on each sample and the Munsell Color evaluation are attached. All the samples passed the maximum 5 percent silt content criterion. The range was 0.3 to 0.8. All the samples failed the maximum 5 percent shell content criterion. The range was 5.7 to 16.1 percent. All the samples passed the Munsell Color Value criterion of 6 or lighter. We took a photograph of the shell retained on the No. 4 sieve of each sample. It appears behind each Report of Sieve Analysis. 9970 Bavaria Road,Fort Myers,Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 FAX(239)768-0409 Florida: Bartow Fort Myers Miami,Orlando,Port St.Lucie,Sarasota,Tallahassee,Tampa,West Palm Beach Louisiana: Alexandria,Baton Rouge,Monroe,New Orleans,Shreveport oepLCIIIVCI I L cu 10 VIII-3 47 of 76 Report of Sediment Compliance Criteria Testing 23-MAY-2013 South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Project No. 13-32-4039 Collier County, Florida Page No. 2 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions about the information contained in this report, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 i Gary A. Drew, P.E. Vice President/Branch Manager GAD/egs Attachments: Report of Sieve Analysis with Photographs NNW Ardaman&Associates,Inc. l,/ pICI I IUCI 14,GV 10 VIII-3 =II III 48 of 76 G�,ttED�p1, Ardaman & Associates, Inc. ,=Mr ;, 9970 Bavaria Road 7B3'R A's(Q- Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT:SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Weight Weight Diameter Diameter Retained Retained Passin Number (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Individual) g ) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 _ 100 3/4 inch 19.0 -4.25 _ 0 0 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 74.1 74.1 5.7 5.7 94.3 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 46.1 120.2 3.5 9.2 90.8 No.8 2.36 -1.25 66.9 187.1 5.1 _ 14.4 85.6 _ No. 10 2.00 -1.0 29.7 216.8 2.3 16.7 83.3 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 75.4 292.2 5.8 22.4 77.6 - No. 16 1.18 -.25 31.0 323.2 2.4 24.8 75.2 No. 20 0.850 0.25 50.5 373.7 3.9 28.7 71.3 No. 30 0.600 0.75 41.4 415.1 3.2 31.9 68.1 - No.40 0.425 _ 1.25 55.7 470.8 4.3 36.2 63.8 No. 50 0.300 _ 1.75 76.0 546.8 5.8 42.0 58.0 No.70 0.212 2.25 159.9 706.7 1.2 54.3 45.7 No. 100 0.150 2.75 493.9 1200.6 37.9 92.2 7.8 No. 140 0.106 _ 3.25 78.3 1278.9 _ 6.0 98.2 1.8 No.200 0.075 3.75 18.1 1297.0 1.4 99.6 0.4 No. 230 0.053 4.00 1.1 1298.1 0.1 99.7 0.3 B•Mebabt]U MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1302.1 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. A SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+260 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL (SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 BY CLIENT 1 S z(4.1'S JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CUENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBUCATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PFNDING oI IR WRRTFN Amor... l,/\L )t JLCI I IVCI IL,LU IJ VIII-3 1 0, s' ., t L,�t' }� 5a ;, yF W L,f , are ---.-4',-- 1:::^°-,� t I. I Lit'_ JCIJICIIIUCI IG,GU IJ VIII-3 Mir 11111 50 of 76 GGRE4zT Ardaman & Associates, Inc. ,,;,„ ; 9970 Bavaria Road �e0 t p,C°� Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Sieve Weight Weight Percent Percent Percent Number Diameter Diameter (Individual) (Cumulative) Retained Retained Passing (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 _ 0 100 34 inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 0 0 _ 7.7 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 99.3 99.3 _ 7.7 92.3 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 64.2 163.5 5.0 12.7 87.3 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 95.0 258.5 7.4 y 20.1 79.9 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 Y 47.2 305.7 3.7 23.8 _ 76.2 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 113.4 419.1 8.8 32.6 67.4 No. 16 1.18 -.25 47.0 466.1 3.7 36.3 _ 63.7 - No.20 0.850 0.25 73.8 539.9 5.7 42.0 58.0 No. 30 0.600 0.75 56.1 596.0 4.4 46.4 _ 53.6 No.40 0.425 1.25 70.4 666.4 5.5 51.8 48.2 No. 50 0.300 _ 1.75 86.0 _ 752.4 6.7 58.5 _ 41.5 No.70 0.212 2.25 142.8 895.2 11.1 69.6 30.4 No. 100 0.150 2.75 _ 291.6 1186.8 22.7 92.3 _ 7.7 No. 140 0.106 3.25 81.4 _ 1268.2 6.3 98.6 1.4 No. 200 0.075 3.75 12.2 1280.4 0.9 99.6 0.4 No. 230 0.053 4.00 0.8 1281.2 0.1 99.6 0.4 MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1285.7 CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A grams SAMPLE NO. B SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+260 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 BY CLIENT J : __ C 124 ( 7 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A. DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPanvet l,/Y%-•O )L I I IUCI I L,GU I J -3 ''',iL?,,r`Noillii''''.7'\-. ‘' , -',:<'.= ' t k. #, , r ,,. t .K �u) ./ ' L,/YL,0Cple1!WC! I L,LU 1 J VIII-3 MEW - 52 of 76 G�'s,ED�Tct+ Ardaman & Associates, Inc. r4,:N r t� 9970 Bavaria Road 7d, - 04 Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Diameter Diameter Weight Weight Retained Retained Passin Number (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) Individual g (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 _ 0 0 0 100 '/a inch 19.0 -4.25 11.3 11.3 0.8 0.8 99.2 - No.4 4.75 _ -2.25 174.5 185.8 12.3 13.1 86.9 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 _ 90.8 _ 276.6 6.4 19.5 80.5 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 125.3 _ 401.9 8.8 28.4 71.6 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 60.0 461.9 4.2 32.6 _ 67.4 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 144.7 606.6 10.2 42.8 57.2 No. 16 1.18 -.25 _ 60.8 667.4 4.3 _ 47.1 52.9 No. 20 0.850 0.25 92.6 761.0 6.6 53.7 46.3 No. 30 0.600 0.75 70.5 831.5 5.0 58.7 41.3 No.40 0.425 _ 1.25 85.7 917.2 6.0 64.7 35.3 No.50 0.300 1.75 98.0 1015.2 6.9 71.6 28.4 No. 70 0.212 2.25 124.1 1139.3 8.8 80.4 19.6 No. 100 0.150 2.75 191.5 1330.8 13.5 93.9 6.1 - No. 140 0.106 3.25 71.1 1401.9 5.0 98.9 1.1 No.200 0.075 3.75 7.6 1409.5 - 0.5 _ 99.4 0.6 No. 230 0.053 4.00 0.8 1410.3 0.1 99.5 0.5 MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1417.3 CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A grams SAMPLE NO. C SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+260 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY COARSE TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL (SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 BY CLIENT ,_.,5( C(r /1 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTFN APPprwe■ '.#/%'j OOjilOII11)01 IL,LV IJ ,,,j,,,,,,',.1",,..44,-;4'.:01;1',"_;';;„,,„3' #e ; fair k £^' AV �Yr, x i pi, �4 P c.-.' ` a i I t' ::7'. 1 'iiiiii'' : .''''—'"'°'''''''' , .. ,. , C--- -'c,,,„,_‘,..4 -,-;, wig ..ii!,.:,- 4, ,,_:,_...4 *.,,,,,,,,. -:, ., , * / ■,r\k,JI.)LCI I IUCI IL,LU I J VIII-3 Mir II 54 of 76 GRED, Ardaman & Associates, Inc. r" r T� 9970 Bavaria Road -74.--tom Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax (239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Diameter Diameter Weight Weight Retained Retained Passin Number (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Individual) g ) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 3/4 inch 19.0 -4.25 7.4 7.4 0.5 0.5 99.5 - No.4 4.75 -2.25 209.5 216.9 _ 13.0 13.5 86.5 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 _ 113.2 330.1 7.0 20.6 79.4 - No. 8 2.36 -1.25 143.8 - 473.9 9.0 29.5 70.5 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 64.8 538.7 4.0 33.5 66.5 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 145.9 684.6 9.1 _ 42.6 57.4 No. 16 1.18 -.25 56.3 740.9 3.5 46.1 53.9 - No. 20 0.850 0.25 80.0 820.9 _ 5.0 51.1 48.9 No. 30 0.600 0.75 54.2 875.1 3.4 54.5 _ 45.5 No.40 0.425 1.25 60.0 935.8 3.7 58.3 41.7 No. 50 0.300 1.75 69.9 _ 1005.7 4.4 62.6 37.6 No.70 0.212 2.25 132.0 1137.7 8.2 70.8 29.2 No. 100 0.150 2.75 354.5 1492.2 22.1 _ 92.9 7.1 No. 140 0.106 3.25 89.0 _ 1581.2 _ 5.5 98.5 1.5 No.200 0.075 3.75 16.8 1598.0 1.0 99.5 0.5 No.230 0.053 4.00 1.4 1599.4 0.1 99.6 0.4 MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1606.0 CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A grams SAMPLE NO. D SAMPLE LOCATION STATION #147+260 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY COARSE TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL (SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 BY CLIENT �2`ti(.3 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBUCATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPPflUAI 011PIO r J w' .14'-». ,`, /J,. , f fir? $ '8ille" .I„ ' jr.i° 4,. ,,,„ -71,,1,1,11.1q '' ' ,... dep wi I 0 Ile 0- (t". CI t ..,.,,,- ri,,,, , e ., ,,,,,,,,„ . . , . ,,,, .., ,,,, , . , . , . , . , ,, , ., , ,,, 4,,,,,, L.tWj JCFJICiiiuei IL,LV IJ VIII-3 _ ' 56 of 76 GGRBDiT Ardaman & Associates, Inc. r mr r• 9970 Bavaria Road -7e� �0 RA Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Diameter Diameter Weight Weight Retained Retained Passin Number (Individual) (Cumulative) 9 (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 3/inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 178.0 178.0 16.1 _ 16.1 83.9 No.6 3.35 -1.75 91.7 269.7 8.3 24.5 75.5 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 116.1 385.8 10.5 35.0 65.0 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 51.5 437.3 4.7 39.7 60.3 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 118.6 555.9 10.8 50.4 49.6 No. 16 1.18 -.25 43.1 599.0 3.9 54.3 45.7 No. 20 0.850 0.25 61.1 660.1 5.5 59.9 40.1 No.30 0.600 0.75 _ 39.1 699.2 _ 3.5 63.4 36.6 J No.40 0.425 1.25 41.4 740.6 3.8 67.2 32.8 No. 50 0.300 1.75 44.5 785.1 4.0 _ 71.2 _ 28.8 No.70 0.212 2.25 73.2 858.3 6.6 77.8 22.2 No. 100 0.150 2.75 164.9 - 1023.2 15.0 92.8 7.2 No. 140 0.106 _ 3.25 - 67.4 1090.6 6.1 98.9 1.1 No. 200 0.075 3.75 7.7 1098.3 0.7 99.6 0.4 No. 0.053 4.00 0.7 1099.0 0.1 99.7 0.3 1 MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1102.7 CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A grams SAMPLE NO. E SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+260 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY COARSE TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 , BY CLIENT 1/ /1-4 i 7 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR RFPf1RTS IS RFSFRVFfl PFNfIN(:ni,c wcrrrrM n000n,n.. . ..., sill, '.;.:7..: ..., ,... . . ,..-. ,.., , . ..../ ,..,,, ... -„,„_........__ ... ,,, ':..,•,, ..,, 1.1„0 1 p ii. ,, I - ) , t4 I . .... I. .,..,, , ..... . . . . , . .. . . ., ,...., ,.., ... „. . .... . .. „. . , . „, ., ..„, .„ , , . . .„.. ,. .., , .. . . , .., . .. _,-'_ ocpteIIIUCI I L,LV I J VIII-3 58 of 76 GRED� G ..,T Ardaman & Associates, Inc. < RIr . 9970 Bavaria Road '�'k7.,c o Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Diameter Diameter Weight Weight al) (Cumulative} Retained Retained Passing Number (Individual)(phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 3/4 inch 19.0 -4.25 6.8 6.8 0.6 0.6 99.4 No.4 4.75 -2.25 104.4 111.2 8.9 9.5 90.5 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 54.0 165.2 4.6 14.1 85.9 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 75.4 240.6 6.5 20.6 79.4 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 35.1 275.7 3.0 23.6 76.4 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 80.5 356.2 6.9 30.5 69.5 No. 16 1.18 -.25 33.5 389.7 2.9 33.4 66.6 No.20 0.850 0.25 51.9 441.6 4.4 _ 37.8 62.2 No. 30 0.600 0.75 39.0 480.6 3.3 41.1 58.9 No.40 0.425 1.25 49.0 529.6 4.2 45.3 54.7 - No.50 0.300 1.75 65.6 595.2 5.6 50.9 49.1 No.70 0.212 2.25 176.8 772.0 15.1 66.1 33.9 No. 100 _ 0.150 2.75 294.4 1066.4 25.2 91.3 8.7 - No. 140 0.106 3.25 78.1 1144.5 6.7 98.0 2.0 - No. 200 0.075 3.75 14.4 1158.9 1.2 99.2 p 8 No.230 0.053 _ 4.00 1.1 1160.0 0.1 99.3 0.7 m - MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1168.4 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. A SAMPLE LOCATION STATION 147+730 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 /-BY CLIENT ____.9.---( - L2Nk1 ( 3 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR FXTRACTS LRCM OR IMo./mnwn 01111 acanorc IC occcrnicn oeunaran,....,..,.,. ..•......-..... y, l..! . ) JLCI I IUCI 1 L,LV I J M: .. I 'P ji::a Y e 't �Y 4 Sk,,1'S V f �I a A b . v, Fy,;„:.,,-;,,,„,;,,,„1„*--e,:„:;„:,4r-;,.(4•\!..-„ii''''' r,r14',.„7-t".-..:k:r:;,.-..'„ r . r .,''''',,:';',',,,,,11, '"'r:.'-''..,:'.',7„,1.''.,,.i-„,'.7-r,,,,sP: ' ',,r'''Y'r'!„•,'/ , - .��"fit , L r,d> .W ;p, a ,buy}}aa: ,,,..,.„,,::-,,,r,i,„.,.-.5,''..,,,,,',',..:;:i.--'i,'' '',,--' -'-'r'''''': '''\''\\\\\: :a'it'ifr 'T'+ 4 ' ,ail '.„.''r'i.i'.„:.,:..i. 1 ` �.. 4 . .fr.,-,,'., „, ,,.'..,# .i.:, _ , :::-,:-.., lat,( ,,,,, ,,,,, .. _.. . :„ , . , W x T, il ry ill 'b1 F , ,,,i 1, L,t\L,JCl/LCIIIUCI I L,LU 1 J VIII-3 60 of 76 Mr GG¢p'DyT Ardaman & Associates, Inc. M,- 9970 Bavaria Road '4'04ger Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax (239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS • Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Diameter Diameter Weight Weight Number (Individual) (Cumulative) Retained Retained Passing (mm) (phi) _ (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 _ 100 1/4 inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 _ 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 121.6 121.6 7.2 7.2 92.8 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 74.0 195.6 4.4 _ 11.6 88.4 - No. 8 2.36 -1.25 97.1 292.7 5.8 17.4 82.6 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 _ 44.8 _ 337.5 2.7 20.1 79.9 No. 14 1.4 _ -0.5 104.7 442.2 6.2 26.3 73.7 No. 16 1.18 -.25 42.5 484.7 2.5 28.8 _ 71.2 No.20 0.850 0.25 65.3 550.0 3.9 32.7 67.3 No. 30 0.600 0.75 51.2 601.2 _ 3.9 35.8 64.2 No.40 0.425 1.25 66.9 668.1 _ 3.0 39.8 60.2 No.50 0.300 1.75 96.6 764.7 5.7 45.5 54.5 No.70 0.212 2.25 381.4 1146.1 22.7 68.2 31.8 No. 100 0.150 2.75 423.8 1569.9 25.2 93.4 6.6 No. 140 0.106 3.25 75.5 1645.4 4.5 97.9 2.1 No.200 0.075 3.75 19.8 1665.2 1.2 99.1 0.9 No.230 0.053 4.00 1.4 1666.6 0.1 99.2 _ 0.8 MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1680.7 CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A grams SAMPLE NO. B SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+730 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/18/13 f3Y CLIENT 7 ____)( S(r2yl0 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS.THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR FYTRACTS FAORA 00 RFRAArtlNO At to oco0OTC to ocecovcn ocl mule nt In,.,.,�.-., LeM4..a pi iIIVCI IL,LU t \t , t r� �:� U hits} �.. lith r tag ljt1lj JCIJLCI I IUCI I L,LU 1 J VIII-3 62 of 76 =II II GCtED�t Ardaman & Associates, Inc. c,mil , 9970 Bavaria Road Ni i+.18 Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Sieve Weight Weight Percent Percent Percent Number Diameter Diameter (Individual) (Cumulative) Retained Retained Passing (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 _ 0 0 0 100 3/4 inch 19.0 -4.25 11.3 11.3 1.0 1.0 99.0 _ No.4 4.75 -2.25 120.7 132.0 10.8 11.8 88.2 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 61.8 193.8 5.5 17.3 82.7 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 78.2 272.0 7.0 24.3 75.7 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 37.3 309.3 3.3 27.7 _ 72.3 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 85.6 394.9 7.7 35.4 _ 64.6 No. 16 1.18 -.25 33.5 428.4 3.0 38.3 61.7 No. 20 0.850 _ 0.25 50.9 _ 479.3 _ 4.6 _ 42.9 - 57.1 1 No. 30 0.600 0.75 36.6 515.9 3.3 46.2 53.8 No.40 0.425 1.25 44.6 560.5 4.0 50.2 _ 49.8 No.50 0.300 1.75 57.0 617.5 5.1 55.3 44.7 No.70 0.212 2.25 151.6 _ 769.1 _ 13.6 68.8 _ 31.2 No. 100 0.150 2.75 256.3 1025.4 22.9 91.8 8.2 No. 140 0.106 3.25 69.3 1094.7 6.2 _ 98.0 2.0 No. 200 0.075 3.75 12.3 _ 1107.0 1.1 99.1 0.9 No. 230 0.053 _ 4.00 1.1 1108.1 0.1 99.2 0.8 l.,elw7..a�10 - -- _ MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1117.1 CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A grams SAMPLE NO. C SAMPLE LOCATION STATION #147+730 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 BY CLIENT ----', cktit//3 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCI I ISInNS ma FYTpACTC caner na oar:an Nun nt to oconoTC IC occroticn oC intban.,.,.,...,,,,,,-..........,.... p µ�„ bk ` L tW,JClJLCI I ILICI I L,4‘)I J ■ A ,' fi } �kr d p"L,3,k4 4af 1 � yd rY I fit eY'sq ! 4 ' ,V 'IK"— ' EY b+F"6, ,,...., . ..,,,,,.. . .,, ,.. . . ,_.,,.. ........, . ..,..„.,.. (---- ,. ... ... . ,,... 1,.., ....... .„.1„,..,.46,- :, ,, --- _ . . '''i*If'11' i3 #�4 pJ� a +i k j 1 , ....,,,,,, ,,,,,,..,,,,,:•,,,, '.1 .- Lil-W.JCIILCIIIUCI I L,LU 1 J VIII-3 64 of 76 allir II GGREbrT Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Y 9970 Bavaria Road Ys.,A�0 Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Sieve Weight Weight Percent Percent Percent Number Diameter Diameter (Individual) (Cumulative) Retained Retained Passing (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 3/inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 82.9 82.9 8.7 8.7 91.3 No. 6 3.35 -1.75 43.0 125.9 4.5 13.3 86.7 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 61.5 187.4 6.5 19.7 80.3 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 28.3 215.7 3.0 22.7 77.3 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 69.9 _ 285.6 7.4 30.1 69.9 No. 16 1.18 -.25 27.7 313.3 _ 2.9 33.0 67.0 No.20 0.850 0.25 43.1 356.4 4.5 37.6 62.4 No. 30 0.600 0.75 32.1 388.5 3.4 40.9 59.1 No.40 0.425 1.25 _ 39.9 428.4 4.2 45.1 54.9 No.50 0.300 1.75 53.5 481.9 5.6 50.8 _ 49.2 - No.70 0.212 2.25 141.5 623.4 14.9 65.7 34.3 No. 100 0.150 2.75 243.5 866.9 25.7 91.4 8.6 - No. 140 0.106 3.25 64.2 931.1 6.8 98.1 1.9 - No. 200 0.075 3.75 10.8 _ 941.9 1.1 99.3 .. 0.7 No. 230 0.053 4.00 0.7 942.6 0.1 99.3 0.7 MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 948.9 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. D SAMPLE LOCATION STATION #147+730 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 Y CLIENT --- JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,AU.REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.COW!LIMNS OR FXTRa(:TR Cams rim acraafINA nl la oconorc is occrovcn octant..n r..."....,,,...-........,........... .w e x . \ ^ �\ / \ \ \\ ° . . »a / lj P1lJ OC}JU I I1UC1 I L,LU 1 J VIII-3 66 of 76 UMW 1111 RED" Ardaman & Associates, Inc. „Me t 9970 Bavaria Road 'BOR pq0� Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone (239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT:SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Diameter Diameter Weight Weight Number (Individual) (Cumulative) Retained Retained Passing (mm) (phi) _ (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 _ -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 - 3/4 inch 19.0 -4.25 8.0 8.0 0.6 0.6 99.4 No.4 4.75 -2.25 127.2 135.2 9.1 9.7 90.3 No.6 3.35 -1.75 66.6 201.8 4.8 14.5 85.5 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 _ 100.9 302.7 7.2 21.7 78.3 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 45.6 348.3 3.2 25.0 75.0 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 104.6 452.9 7.5 32.5 67.5 No. 16 1.18 -.25 42.0 - 494.9 3.0 35.5 64.5 No.20 0.850 0.25 63.8 558.7 4.6 40.1 59.9 _ No. 30 0.600 0.75 47.7 606.4 3.4 43.5 56.5 No.40 0.425 1.25 59.4 665.8 4.3 47.7 52.3 - - No. 50 0.300 1.75 81.9 747.7 5.9 _ 53.6 46.4 No. 70 0.212 2.25 228.3 976.0 16.4 70.0 30.0 No. 100 0.150 2.75 311.2 1287.2 22.3 92.3 7.7 No. 140 0.106 _ 3.25 81.0 1368.2 5.8 98.1 1.9 No. 200 0.075 3.75 15.5 _ 1383.7 1.1 _ 99.2 0 8 No. 230 0.053 4.00 1.2 _ 1384.9 0.1 99.3 0.7 MUNSELL COLOR 10YR 7/1 LIGHT GRAY TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 1394.4 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. E SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+730 DESCRIPTION LIGHT GRAY MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 5/8/13 BY CLIENT .,,S' e (fr JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO,35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING Of IR REPORTS IS RFSFRVFf1 PFNOINO nl to wolrrrI, Ar.,,,,.., L.,,,,..,oev,„_,.......„1".,1 I 4'4U I‘),,,,,,._... 2 . , .. -':- . . , . . . ,.. . . .... ' '-'-';., ,,■.-. . .5.:, \ ,• . , 'i .. r . , . /17 'I'■, . ........ f. .'," r3f.1 . .,, ,,,,,,,,' i i cA ' ',...) 4`,....a.n...- ' .....1 44. . ... ..,', ......., 't . .,..,......., ,. ,......„ „... .-,... ...... , .., .., ... _.4: . ... 1., N., ' ...'..... . ,. .,, lilt „. ....._ ,.., .... . . / ir- / ' ..,- CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 68 of 76 UMW MI Ardaman & Associates, Inc. IIIIIIIIAII Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants Ardaman Project No. 13-32-4039 01-JULY-2013 TO: Coastal Zone Management Collier County Natural Resource Department Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Attention: Mr. Clint Perryman SUBJECT: Report of Sediment Compliance Criteria Testing South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Collier County, Florida Dear Clint: We received li samples of sand labeled Existing Material STA. 146+500 through 147+700. We tested each sample to determine if the sand meets the project compliance criteria of maximum 5 percent silt content (passing the No. 230 sieve), maximum 5 percent shell content (retained on the No. 4 sieve) and Munsell Color Value of 6 or lighter. The results of the sieve analysis performed on each sample and the Munsell Color evaluation are attached. All the samples passed the maximum 5 percent silt content criterion. The range was 0.4 to 1.3. All the samples failed the maximum 5 percent shell content criterion. The range was 5.8 to 11 .6 percent. All the samples passed the Munsell Color Value criterion of 6 or lighter. 9970 Bavaria Road,Fort Myers,Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 FAX(239)768-0409 Florida: Bartow,Fort Myers,Miami,Orlando,Port St.Lucie,Sarasota,Tallahassee,Tampa,West Palm Beach Louisiana: Alexandria,Baton Rouge,Monroe,New Orleans,Shreveport CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 69 of 76 Report of Sediment Compliance Criteria Testing 01-JULY-2013 South Marco Island Beach Nourishment Project No. 13-32-4039 Collier County,Florida Page No. 2 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions about the information contained in this report, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 Gary A. Drew, P.E. Vice President/Branch Manager GAD/sf Attachments: Report of Sieve Analysis Now IN Andaman&Associates, Inc. CAC September 12,2013 70 o 3 70 of 76 L,.1-''"/r,. Ardaman & Associates, Inc. _,.�► �': 9970 Bavaria Road --4.t,k Ks. °¢ : Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve i Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Weight WeighLRetained i Diameter I Diameter Retained I Passing Number (mm) l (phi) (Individual) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 %inch 19.0 -4.25 12.7 12.7 2.0 1 2.0 I 98.0 No.4 4.75 -2.25 102.5 � 115.2 16.2 18.2 I 81.8 No.6 3.35 -1.75 57.0 172.2 9.0 27.2 72.8 No.8 2.36 -1.25 91.7 263.9 14.5 41.7 58,3 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 48.6 312.5 7.7 49.4 50.6 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 107.5 420.0 17.0 66,4 33.6 No. 16 t18 -.25 34.1 4541 5.4 71.7 28.3 No 20 0.850 0.25 40.7 494.8 ± 6.4 78.2 21.8 _ No 30 0.600 0.75 22.8 517.6 3.6 81.8 18.2 No.40 0.425 1.25 16.1 533.7 2.5 84.3 15.7 No.50 0.300 1.75 14.1 547.8 2.2 86.5 i 13.5 No.70 0.212 2.25 22.4 570.2 3.5 90.1 9.9 No 100 0.150 2.75 35.9 606.1 5.7 95.8 f 4.2 No. 140 0.106 3.25 17.0 623.1 2.7 98.4 1.6 No.200 0.075 I 3.75 3.2 626.3 0.5 98.9 1.1 - -+ -- No.230 ; 0.053 I 4.00 0.8 627.1 0.1 99.1 0.9 BYCh.Y,AOSU MUNSELL COLOR 2.5Y 8/2 WHITE TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 633.0 c,rams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. F SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#148+00-EXISTING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WHITE COARSE TO FINE SAND, SOME GRAVEL(SHELL) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 6/3/13 BY CLIENT .c. ilL I(s C S JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO 35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CUENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 3 MI" III 71 of 76 LaFaa,T� Ardaman & Associates, Inc. r rivcr 9970 Bavaria Road 14'«k: -"} Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve j Percent Percent Percent Sieve Weight � Weight Number Diameter Diameter (Individual) I (Cumulative) Retained Retained Passing -(mm) (phi) (individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 - -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 3/4 inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 1 -2.25 35.6 35.6 5.8 5.8 94.2 No.6 3.35 j -1.75 22.6 58.2 3.7 9.5 1 90.5 I No.8 2.36 -1.25 r 30.0 88.2 4.9 14.4 85.6 No 10 2.00 -1.0 16.1 104.3 2.7 17.1 82.9 - No. 14 1.4 -0.5 36.2 140.5 5.9 23.0 77.0 No 16 1.18 -.25 15.5 156.0 2.5 25.5 74.5 No 20 0.850 0.25 25.4 181.4 4.2 29.7 70.3 No. 30 0.600 0.75 �22.4 203.8 3.6 33.3 j 66.7 No 40 0.425 1 1.25 28.7 ., -232.5 4.7 38.0 62.0 No 50 0.300 1.75 46.8 279.3 i 1 7.7 45.7 54.3 No.70 0.212 2.25 ( 114.1 i 393.4 18.7 64.4 35.6 No 100 1 0.150 2.75 155.6 549.0 25.4 { 89.8 10.2 No. 140 .- 0.106 3.25 48.7 j 597.7 8.0 j 97.8 22 No.200 0.075 3.75 4.5 ' 6022 0.7 98.5 1.5 No 230 t 0.053 4.00 0.8 I 603.0 0.2 ! 98.7 1.3 MUNSELL COLOR 5Y 8/1 WHITE TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 611.2 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. G SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#146+500 (150'WEST OF DUNE)-EXISTING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WHITEMEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL FRAGMENTS) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 6/26/13 BY CLIENT a t _ (I4, _ JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO 35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS tS RESRVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 111111, 111 72 of 76 ...k'bi Ardaman & Associates, Inc. � �= 9970 Bavaria Road y,,,',R Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS I Sieve Sieve { Percent Percent Percent i Sieve Diameter Diameter Weight Weight Retained Retained Passing Number (Individual) (Cumulative) (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) T�- I inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 j 0 100 %inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 j 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 33.9 1 33.9 5.8 5.8 94.2 No.6 3.35 -1.75 21.4 55.3 3.6 9.4 90.6 No. [ 2.36 -1.25 30.9 86.2 5.2 14.6 85.4 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 17.4 103.6 1 3.0 17.6 82.4 No 14 1.4 -0.5 40.9 i 144 5 i 6.9 24.5 75.5 No. 16 1.18 -.25 1 17.2 161.7 3.0 27.5 72.5 No.20 0.850 0.25 I 28.8 190.5 4.9 ! 32.4 67.6 No.30 0.600 0.75 25.3 215.8 4.3 j 36.7 63.3 No.40 0.425 1.25 31.5 247.3 6.1 42.8 58.0 No. 50 0.300 1.75 47.0 294.3 7.2 50.0 50.0 No.70 0.212 2.25 96.1 } 390.4 16.3 66.3 33.7 No. 100 0.150 2.75 128.8 ` 519.2 ( 21.9 88.2 11.8 No. 140 0.106 3.25 56.6 575.8 f 9.6 97.8 2.2 No 200 0.075 3.75 5.8 581.6 I 1.0 98.8 1.2 No.230 ' 0.053 4.00 0.8 582.4 1 0.1 98.9 1.1 BMCMMAMW36 MUNSELL COLOR 5Y 8/1 WHITE TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 588.6 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. H SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#146+750 (150'WEST OF DUNE)-EXISTING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WHITE MEDIUM TO FIN E SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL FRAGMENTS) -- v PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 6/26/13 BY CLIENT JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 73 of 76 `3'i•"/"-, Ardaman & Associates, Inc. r 9970 Bavaria Road ,s, ,_10`s Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve Percent Percent Percent Sieve Weight Weight g ht 1 Diameter ; Diameter Retained Retained Passing Number (mm) (phi) (Individual) 1 (Cumulative) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 %inch 19.0 -4.25 13.9 13.9 2.5 2.5 97.5 No.4 4.75 -2.25 31.2 45.1 5.5 8.0 92.0 No.6 3.35 -1.75 14.9 1 60.0 2.7 j 10.7 89.3 • No.8 i 2.36 -1.25 21.2 81.2 3.7 14.4 85.6 No. 10 ! 2.00 -1.0 11.5 92.7 5.8 16.5 83.5 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 29.0 121.7 5.1 21.6 78.4 No. 16 1.18 -.25 41.5 134.2 2.2 23.8 76.2 No.20 ` 0.850 0.25 23.4 157.6 4.2 28.0 72.0 No 30 0.600 0.75 22.1 179.7 3.9 31.9 68.1 { No 40 0.425 1.25 29.9 209.6 5.3 37.2 62.8 • No.50 0.300 I 1.75 49.9 i 259.5 8.9 46.1 53.9 No.70 0.212 2.25 109.0 368.5 19.3 65.4 34.6 No. 100 0.150 2.75 136.9 505.4 24.3 j 89.7 10.3 No. 140 0.106 3.25 1 45.3 550.7 8.1 97.8 2.2 No.200 0.075 3.75 4.6 555.3 0.8 98.6 1.4 No.230 0.053 1 4.00 0.8 556.1 0.1 98.7 I 1.3 If sochcbud.210 MUNSELL COLOR 5Y 811 WHITE TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 563.2 CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. I SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+000(150'WEST OF DUNE)-EXISTING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WHITE MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL FRAGMENTS) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 6/26/13 „ BY CLIENT , 7,: /IJ JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO 35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR MITTEN APPROVAL CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 74 of 76 ¢c Eb?;,, Ardaman & Associates, Inc, -- 9970 Bavaria Road ,s, ort 0 Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve ' Sieve Weight Weight Percent Percent Percent Number Diameter Diameter (Individual) (Cumulative) Retained Retained i Passing (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 1 0 100 '/a inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 j 44.3 44.3 7.8 j 7.8 92.2 No 6 3.35 -1.75 I 23.9 68.2 4.3 12.1 87.9 No. 8 2.36 -1.25 32.9 101.1 5.8 17.9 82.1 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 i 16.1 117.2 2.8 ; 20.7 79.3 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 38.6 155.8 i 6.8 27.5 72.5 No 16 1.18 25 15.2 171.0 1 2.7 30.2 69.8. No.20 0.850 0.25 24.3 195.3 ± 4.3 34.5 65.5 No.30 i 0.600 0.75 19.5 214.8 3.5 38.0 62.0 No.40 ' 0.425 1.25 21.7 236.5 3.8 41.8 58.2 No.50 0.300 1.75 29.8 266.3 5.3 47.1 52.9 No.70 0.212 2.25 68.8 335.1 12.1 59.2 40.8 No. 100 0.150 2.75 148.6 483.7 26.3 85.5 14.5 No 140 0.106 3.25 69.4 553.1 12.3 97.8 2.2 No.200 i 0.075 3.75 6.7 559.8 1.1 98.9 1.1 No.230 0.053 I 4.00 0.7 560.5 0.2 99.1 0.9 Beeclic0aete700 MUNSELL COLOR 5Y 8/1 WHITE TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 491.2 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. J SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+250(150'WEST OF DUNE)-EXISTING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WHITE MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL FRAGMENTS) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 6/26/13 BY CLIENT / f 7(1 l3 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL CAC September 12,2013 MEW 111 VIII-3 `�1 r),'� 75 of 76 Ardaman & Associates, Inc. y to, 9970 Bavaria Road ,„„H�1` Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve { 1- Percent Percent Percent Sieve Weight Weight Number Diameter Diameter (Individual) (Cumulative) Retained Retained Passing (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 ! -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 %inch 19.0 -4.25 0 0 0 0 100 No.4 4.75 -2.25 32.3 32.3 6.6 6.6 93.4 No.6 3.35 -1.75 14.8 ' 47.1 3.0 9.6 90.4 No.8 2.36 -1.25 22.4 69.5 4.5 14.1 85.9 No 10 2.00 -1.0 11.5 81.0 2.4 16.5 83.5 No 14 1.4 -0.5 27.4 I 108.4 5.6 22.1 77.9 No 16 1.18 -.25 11.1 119.5 2.2 24.3 75.7 No.20 0.850 0.25 17.5 137.0 3.6 27.9 72.1 No.30 0.600 0.75 14.4 151.4 2.9 30.8 69.2 No.40 0.425 1.25 16.9 168.3 3.5 34.3 65.7 No.50 0.300 1.75 23.8 192.1 4.8 39.1 60.9 No.70 0.212 2.25 63.7 , 255.8 12.9 52.0 48.0 No 100 0.150 2.75 148.9 404.7 30.4 82.4 17.6 No. 140 0.106 3.25 71.8 476.5 14.6 97.0 3.0 , No. 0.075 3.75 8.5 485.0 1.7 98.7 1.3 - No.230 0.053 4.00 0.8 485.8 0.2 98.9 1.1 Bt00Ml00go070 MUNSELL COLOR 5Y 8/1 WHITE TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 491.2 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. K SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+500-EXISTING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WHITE MEDIUM TO FINE SAND,TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL FRAGMENTS) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 6/26/13 BY CLIENT .- i--- ?1 tit ) JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P.E.,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 76 of 76 L° IOW 11 Ardaman & Associates, Inc. COE. ,-. _.. 9970 Bavaria Road Fort Myers, Florida 33913 Phone(239)768-6600 Fax(239)768-0409 Florida Certificate of Authorization No. 00005950 REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS PROJECT: SEDIMENT COMPLIANCE CRITERIA TESTING FILE NO: 13-32-4039 SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH NOURISHMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTED TO: COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT COPIES: 2-CLIENT COLLIER CO. NATURAL RESOURCE DEPT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 ATTENTION: MR. CLINT PERRYMAN SIEVE ANALYSIS Sieve Sieve ght W ht ' 1 Percent Percent Percent Sieve Weight Diameter Diameter Retained Passing , Number (Individual) (Cumulative) ! Retained (mm) (phi) (Individual) (Cumulative) (Cumulative) 1 inch 25.0 -4.75 0 0 0 0 100 3/4 inch ' 19.0 -4.25 4.6 4.6 , 0.7 0.7 99.3 t . No.4 4.75 -2.25 70.6 72.5 10.9 11.6 88.4 No.6 3.35 -1.75 27.2 I 99.7 4.3 15.9 84.1 No 8 2.36 -1.25 34.8 134.5 5.6 21.5 78.5 No. 10 2.00 -1.0 15.7 150.2 2.5 24.0 1 76.0 No. 14 1.4 -0.5 37.4 187.6 6.0 30.0 70.0 No. 16 1.18 -.25 13.8 201.4 2.2 I 32.2 67.8 No.20 0.850 0.25 21.6 223.0 i 3.4 35.6 64.4 No.30 0.600 0.75 17.0 ' 240.0 2.7 38.3 61.7 No.40 0.425 1.25 18.6 258.6 3.0 41.3 58.7 No 50 0.300 1.75 25.5 284.1 , 4.1 45.4 54.6 No.70 0.212 2.25 70.3 354.4 --1 ; 11.2 56.6 43.4 No 100 0.150 2.75 179.3 533.7 28.7 85.3 14.7 No. 140 0.106 3.25 , 78.7 612.4 12.5 97.8 , 2.2 1 No 200 0.075 3.75 10.0 622.4 1.6 99.4 ! 0.6 i No.230 0.053 s 4.00 0.8 623.2 02 99.6 i 0.4 SeachelaPo210 MUNSELL COLOR 5Y 811 WHITE TOTAL DRY WEIGHT 626.0 grams CARBONATE CONTENT: N/A SAMPLE NO. L SAMPLE LOCATION STATION#147+700(200 WEST OF DUNE)- EXISTING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WHITE MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE GRAVEL(SHELL FRAGMENTS) PROPOSED USE BEACH RENOURISHMENT DATE SAMPLED 6/26/13 , BY CLIENT / , t!.., 7/ , 1 - 74'.7 JUAN HERNANDEZ GARY A.DREW,P E,VICE PRESIDENT LABORATORY SUPERVISOR FL.LICENSE NO.35504 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC,AND OURSELVES,ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL.PROPERTY OF CLIENTS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL tti�a, ,° ° : , ,l j w v r4 i Z 2' P ! :( as.Ai i AA,'.1 4.4 cn la O �,1 '�.� °o ? I.'�a v o 0 t" r ,0 1.1 O � I t/1Q � N, S :,i ,, . .,1 ,_ I , c. CI) czt U • ,-,,, p ,7±, 1,, . , 44 z Li- 0.-4 :_-, ) _, , , 1 ag ?,' ! : [ 1' 3 q J;i�~. °•e: w q . o x h ±o __ _ I;i• 0° ,7C' C.4 !,, .4.4 ., \ — - -- , \, 1 =!.., -..., °Z , CX.I Z r=4 g ',2 -,,, --' ‘,, Z I w U p " ,� ', O 1 H 2.. %% :• 1 Z 0U € atx;aa n , 0 a Cn U �� V m I il O i t U /' , i' t E--, '''','HO-� °ua ' " 7' . _ ■ 0 0 ,''- h - --r,' ':,,'k — ---:-' ):\ — Si ,,. 0 :rJ; Ali I a , O� 1. , re, c Ir' i n W ro '' Q m �, o � 3 o \ z,,, o, , I I„ U 1.. a _'3WaF \\ z Z Iz W �I z __ w. _ � nG z `W Y 20 >32U 2,-3 I 1 1 Lt x3 _ - m� I __it all _la_.2 �2..i i c�U�-4 , o v, o v, o v, o J i ray Y ."--+ r•-.1 4 Y 51P4 O h w T �� : i 2 n p ~� ' '� "i o7', ° VmU� a1 W`i m , o ,,a ��• `t1A , rJ LO er \E":11 •..., ... , - V p CU 1i ! i tt- lil s a r a / v> _ a a o a Y a � : � ? I� t I j al aa� fy r� R �/ a q' a i 8 t It - Ft; 7 ,�',^+ m i i',l : ' ‘k '7)'''''I:kil --,11!'''''' a �a a D i at / g j _ ° o a6O ate° 1r: il w _ , _ 0 45 f 1 1. - oz kx II s ¢ _ _ "-I. l' P- °moo Paz - t W a 3 ,-.,., ,z'5,, .7_ ".:,-- ]I -V�o-2 +Zw. 8V.-4 n o_ , CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 New Business COASTAL 1 of CECI Group Services ENGINEERING Civil Engineering Planning Services CONSULTANTS Survey & Mapping INC. Coastal Engineering Environmental A CECI GROUP COMPANY MEMORANDUM TO: Gary McAlpin,P.E. FROM: Michael Poff,P.E. DATE: September 4,2013 SUBJECT: South Marco Beach & Erosion Control Structures Response to Questions from Coastal Advisory Committee CEC FILE NO. 11.122 1.Erosion Losses off the Beach Fill It is well documented in the literature that beach fills undergo profile adjustment during the equilibration process, e.g. the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Manual, Journal of Coastal Research, and Coastal Sediments. These adjustments can be rapid depending upon the site conditions, coastal forcing functions, sediment characteristics, and weather patterns. Beaches that are sediment deprived (sand starved), for example in front of seawalls, can undergo rapid adjustment after renourishment. Taylor Engineering conducted the annual monitoring of the project area from 2002 to 2005, and performed the design and permitting of the 2007 renourishment project. In their design report that accompanied the Joint Coastal Permit Application (Taylor, 2004), Taylor predicted an equilibrium profile adjustment of approximately 20 feet at R-147, 30 feet at R-148/G-1 (just north of the north groin), and 50 feet at G-2 (in-between the two groins). Last time the beach was renourished was in 2007. Based on the Post-Construction Report and First Monitoring Report prepared by Humiston and Moore (H&M) (2007 and 2008, respectively), the following statistics were derived. Approximately 176,000 cy were placed between R-143 and the north groin. Of this volume, approximately 87,900 cy were placed from R-147 to the north groin. No sand was placed between the two groins. The 2007 project underwent the following adjustments after construction. During the first monitoring period, the beach between R-147 and R-148 lost approximately 26,700 cy (equal to 30% of the placed volume), and experienced shoreline erosion at Mean High Water (MHW) ranging from 29 ft/yr to 39 ft/yr. Accretion was documented between the two groins noting no sand was placed directly between the structures. In the conclusions and recommendations, H&M (2008) stated that previous monitoring reports document the breakwaters have reduced sand losses significantly; recent monitoring demonstrates the breakwaters are still providing this function; and the influx of sand from the north in combination with the breakwaters should continue to 3106 South Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104 Phone(239)643-2324 Fax(239)643-1143 www.coastalengineering.com CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 New Business 2 of 3 CEC Project No. 11.122 COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. September 4,2013 Page 2 provide stability to the project area, however the breakwater design is intended to allow natural littoral processes at the inlet to occur and periodic renourishment may be necessary. Based on the Second Monitoring Report prepared by Coastal Planning and Engineering (CP&E) (2009), the following statistics were derived. During the second monitoring period, the beach between R-147 and the north groin lost approximately 5,900 cy/yr, and experienced shoreline erosion at MHW ranging from 5 ft/yr to 10 ft/yr. Erosion on the order of 17,200 cy/yr was measured between the two groins, the average shoreline erosion at MHW was 8 ft/yr, and the highest rate of erosion was 25 ft/yr. CP&E stated the rate of shoreline erosion reduced in Year 2 compared to Year 1 as the project underwent initial profile equilibration during the first monitoring period. Based upon documented performance of beach fill projects, the design premise of the South Marco Beach Renourishment Project, and historical monitoring of the Project, the erosion losses experienced to date for the 2013 South Marco Beach Renourishment Project are primarily due to the profiles undergoing the equilibration process. 2. Alternatives Analyses for the Erosion Control Structures Between 2002 and 2005 Taylor Engineering conducted the monitoring and performed the design of the South Marco Beach Renourishment project. As part of their recommendations, Taylor stated that beach restoration is the preferred alternative to mitigate erosion on the south end of the island (Taylor 2003, 2005). In 2008, H&M conducted an evaluation of the Erosion Control Structures. Based upon a comparison of the breakwater surveys from 1996 (post-construction) to 2002 (condition survey) to 2008 (condition survey), H&M observed the crest elevations of the breakwaters have been lowered since their installation. They noted the lowering of the crest is the result of displacement and consolidation of the rock from the crest to the slope or apron which was attributed to the significant storms in 2004 and 2005. Their recommendation was to restore the segmented breakwaters. With respect to the groins, the comparison of the 2008 condition survey and design elevations indicated the groins had not lowered significantly. H&M recommended no action with respect to the groins noting with the breakwaters in place,the groins are adequate for their design purpose (H&M, 2008). In 2011, Coastal Engineering Consultants (CEC) in partnership with Coastal Technology Corporation conducted a numerical model study to evaluate erosion control alternatives for the South Marco Beach Renourishment Project to address the localized erosion of the dry beach documented south of R-147 over time. The scope of work included analysis of historical data; collection of additional survey data; set-up, calibration, and validation of a combined hydrodynamic and morphologic change numerical modeling program; preparation of conceptual designs; and an analysis of alternatives including simulation of the conceptual designs in the modeling program (CEC, 2011). 3106 South Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104 Phone(239)643-2324 Fax(239)643-1143 www coastalengi neering.corn CAC September 12,2013 VIII-3 New Business 3 of 3 CEC Project No. 11.122 COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. September 4,2013 Page 3 The conceptual designs included permitted beach fill only; permitted beach fill plus a feeder beach (place additional sand to the north and allow natural processes to transport the sand into the project area), permitted beach fill plus installation of an additional groin cited to the north of the existing groins, and permitted beach fill plus installation of an additional breakwater cited north of the existing breakwaters. Two (2) state-of-the-art models were considered in the study, MIKE21 and Delft3D. Both models were calibrated and performed similarly well predicting tidal elevations, waves, and, to a certain degree, currents. However, the MIKE21 model outperformed Delft3D in more accurately predicting morphologic changes and was chosen to model the developed alternatives. Through numerical modeling it was demonstrated that the additional groin alternative outperformed the other alternatives in terms of sustaining a wider beach in the Project area. However, the model predictions indicated the benefits of an additional groin were localized to the area of influence of the structure. Based upon the model results, engineering judgment, experience of the County and Consulting Team, and the cost to benefit analysis, the additional structure was not justified. The final report recommended constructing the permitted beach fill and repairing the existing erosion control structures (breakwaters and groins); then utilize an incremental beach management plan consisting of truck hauls to address any localized erosion of the dry beach south of R-147 between renourishment events. 3106 South Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104 Phone(239)643-2324 Fax(239)643-1143 www.coastalengineering.corn CAC Septemer 12,2013 VIII-4 1 of 5 From: McAloinGary To: NambrightGait Subject: FW:Collier County Bid Format-TS Fay and Remaining County"Hot Spots" Project Date: Tuesday,August 27,2013 1:21:27 PM From: Munoz, Jesse [mailto:Jesse.Munoz @fema.dhs.gov] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 5:38 PM To: McAlpinGary Cc: 'Rosenberg, Evan'; Rhoads, Valerie; Wilson, Paul Subject: RE: Collier County Bid Format-TS Fay and Remaining County "Hot Spots" Project Gary: Our Public Assistance staff is still reviewing the documentation you sent us via the state.There are some issues we would like to discuss with you,your staff and the state PA staff. We will coordinate a conference call through the state early next week. Have a nice weekend, Jesse Jesse F. Munoz, CEM Director Recovery Division DHS— FEMA Region IV Office: 770-220-5212 Cell: 678-491-0394 Fax: 770-220-5229 iesse munozra7fetna.dhs.gov From: McAlpinGary [mailto:GaryMcAlpin @colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:52 AM To: Munoz, Jesse; Rosenberg, Evan Cc: CasalanguidaNick; LorenzWilliam; KearnsAllison; StanleyTherese; OberrathKaren Subject: RE: Collier County Bid Format-TS Fay and Remaining County "Hot Spots" Project Good morning Evan and Jesse, To keep you up to date,we are moving forward with our beach renourishment project. We have received bids and we are currently evaluating them. We are scheduled to award the contracts in early September but are looking for you input prior to award so if anything in our bidding or approach needs changing, it can be done before award. Any indication of when you will be returning your comments to us on our bidding and approach to TS Fay and timing for obligation for TS Debbie? Thanks for your help and support. Gary McAlpin CAC Septemer 12,2013 VIII-4 2 of 5 From:Rosenberg, Evan [mailto:Evan.RosenbergCaem.myflorida.com] Sent: Tuesday,August 06, 2013 8:40 AM To: McAlpinGary Subject: FW: Collier County Bid Format -TS Fay and Remaining County "Hot Spots" Project Good morning Gary. FEMA has acknowledged that they will review the plan you sent. ER From: Munoz, Jesse [mailto:Jesse,Munoznfema.dhs.gov] Sent: Tuesday,August 06, 2013 5:59 AM To: Rosenberg, Evan Subject: Re: Collier County Bid Format-TS Fay and Remaining County "Hot Spots" Project Good morning, Evan. Our office will review and provide comments. We will send comments through your office. Thanks, Jesse Jesse F. Munoz, CEM Director, Recovery Division DHS-FEMA Region IV 0:770-220-5212 M:678-491-0394 Jesse.munozc fema.dhs.gov From: Rosenberg, Evan [mailto:Evan.RosenbergCc�em.myflorida.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 04:58 PM Eastern Standard Time To: Munoz, Jesse Cc: Seibert, Robert <Robert.Seibert(aem.myflorida.com>; GarvMcalpin@icolliergov.net Subject: FW: Collier County Bid Format -TS Fay and Remaining County "Hot Spots" Project Good afternoon Jesse. Collier County forwarded this email to the State (see attached and below),and asked us to forward to FEMA R-4 along with an official request for review and comment. In accordance with discussion that occurred between R-4 and Collier County on July 26, 2013, the state hereby officially requests such review,with the end result to be comment, direction and/or approval of the approach outlined therein for TS-Fay. The State of Florida continues to support Collier County as its appeals on prior events run their course through the FEMA administrative procedures,and hopes that this open dialogue can prevent such conflicts for this and future events. Thanks in advance. CAC Septemer 12,2013 VIII-4 3 of 5 Evan Rosenberg Bureau Chief of Recovery Florida Division of Emergency Management From: McAlpinGary Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:24 PM To: 'Seibert, Robert; 'Cai, Yan (Contractor); 'loren minutoli'; mpetruzzo(acomcast.net; 'Rosenberg, Evan' Cc: CasalanguidaNick; StanleyTherese; KearnsAllison; OberrathKaren; ChungAlix; JohnsonScott; MarkiewiczJoanne Subject: FW: Collier County Bid Format -TS Fay and Remaining County "Hot Spots" Project Importance: High Bob,Yan, Loren and Margie: On Friday July 26,2013 Collier County met in Atlanta with FEMA Region IV to discuss the de- obligation of PW 2700-Hurricane Wilma and the bidding and invoicing procedures for TS Fay. Collier County was concerned that our approach to bidding and Invoicing of TS Fay was correct and desired FEMA's opinion/approval of our approach. Our goal was to come to agreement on the approach before any work proceeded. Jesse Munoz and his team indicated that they would be happy to review information and provide feedback but requested that everything be routed through Florida Department of Emergency Management(FDEM)first. I am sending this to you for your review and comment but am also requesting that you also forward this concurrently to Jesse Munoz in Atlanta for review and comment by his team. Jesse can be reached at jesse.munozCa fema.dhs.gov. Since Bob Seibert has FDEM operational control of TS Fay and Margie Petruzzo is our primary contact for TS Debbie, I am passing this request to both of you for your input and immediate forwarding to Jesse Munoz for FEMA's review and comment. TS Fay Attached is our bid form that is currently being bid for TS Fay and a Collier County Alternate#1 for Hot Spot renourishment. Bids are currently due on 8/7/2013 so input time is tight. With this project and form, we have the following clarifying comments: 1. We have changed our renourishment approach from dredged material from an offshore borrow site and placed on the beach through hydraulic renourishment to one of truck haul and dry placement. This is definitely not our preferred method of placement and will involve over 15,000 truck trips over a three month period during the heart of tourist season. Our dredging price of$32,000,000++for what we considered a $15,000,000 project requires this approach. 2. We are looking to renourish our beaches with 250,000 cubic yards of sand or 375,000 Tons. The conversion from cubic yards to tons is a multiplier of 1.5. The hauling industry only deals in tons, so for simplicity,we converted over to their method and developed a bid sheet in tons. 3. Our FDEP permit template will allow for in excess of 500,000 cy's of material to renourishment our beaches and we can justify placing more that 250,000 cy's of material CAC Septemer 12,2013 VIII-4 4 of 5 on the beaches, but community concerns and funding are restricting us in our approach. The ranges of fill placement are listed as R monuments on the bid form. 4. This will be the largest truck haul in the shortest period in Florida history. To maximize our chances of success, we have broken the overall project in two natural subprojects. The first subproject will be the Vanderbilt and Pelican Bay Beaches and the second will be the Park Shore and Naples beaches. We would like each of these subprojects to be awarded to separate contractors with distinct operations and control. However,we will accept one contractor if they are low bidder and can prove to us that they can accomplish the entire project within the required timeframe. 5. TS Fay PW 1146 was approved with an overall renourishment volume of 174,576 cy's for the Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples beaches. Collier County plans on placing only 165,000 cy's on these same beaches utilizing truck haul renourishment. 6. The overall project will be bid competitively with a base bid that only includes the TS Fay authorized portion (165,000 cy's) and Alternate#1 bid (85,000 cy's)that includes Collier County Hot Spots for a total of 250,000 cy's. Collier County is expecting FEMA to reimburse the County for the supply,transport and placement of sand for the Base Bid—TS Fay or 165,000 cy's of sand on the TS Fay damaged beaches. Alternate#1 or the Collier County Hot Spots will be the responsibility of Collier County. 7. Collier County will be obtaining Lump Sum pricing for turbidity monitoring, maintenance of traffic and surveys that are directly related to the Base Bid-TS Fay. We would expect FEMA to reimburse Collier County for these expensive as they are directly related to the placement of the 165,000 cy's of sand on the TS Fay damaged beaches. Collier County will also be soliciting lump sum pricing for the Alternate#1-Hot spots renourishment portion of the beaches which is Collier's responsibility. 8. Collier County is expecting FEMA to reimburse Collier County for all mobilization costs. FEMA will be required to mobilize/demobilize equipment for TS Fay regardless if Collier performs any work. No additional equipment will be required to complete the work for Alternate#1-Hot Spots which is Collier's responsibility. All mobilization/demobilization costs are included in The Base Bid-TS Fay. 9. Collier County is requiring the successful bidder to invoice Collier County independently via separate invoices for both the Base Bid—TS Fay and Alternate#1—Hot Spots. Collier County will request reimbursement from FEMA utilizing the independent Base Bid invoice. 10. Engineering work began on the combined TS Fay and Collier County Hot Spot project before the completion date was extended to 12/31/2014. Until this extension, Collier was unsure if the TS Fay work extension would be granted. The first series of engineering invoices were not split out to separately between the TS Fay scope and the Collier County Hot Spot scope because of this. These initial invoices were not forwarded to you for reimbursement because Collier was not sure of the proration approach. After the extension of TS Fay was granted, all engineering invoices have be split out and invoiced separately by the engineering consultant and we have requested reimbursement for these separate invoices. We are proposing that the engineering invoices that have not been forwarded for reimbursement because tasks have been co-mingled between TS Fay and Collier County Hot Spots be prorated based on the quantity of sand for the TS Fay Base Bid (165,000 cy's) and the total project quantity of sand (250,000cy's). CAC Septemer 12,2013 VIII-4 5 of 5 TS Debbie In our meeting, Jesse Munoi s team indicated that TS Debbie PW's was in the final stage of review and obligation. If obligation is accomplished in sufficient time to complete TS Debbie's renourishment concurrently with TS Fay,the County would propose: 1. The cubic yards obligated per beach section for TS Debbie be added to the quantities listed above. The overall quantity of the project would most likely increase but the County's portion of the project might decrease depending on where the sand was authorized and if it covered a Hot Spot location slated for renourishment by the County. The exact project totals and split between TS Debbie and the County would not be known until a quick analysis can be performed. Collier County would not expect the Totals for TS Fay to change. 2. Collier County would issue a change order to the selected contractor to perform this work at the competitive pricing that are currently being bid for TS Fay. Pricing for additional maintenance of traffic, surveys and turbidity monitoring will be obtained and verified against the bid line items for the TS Fay and Alternate#1 Hot Spot pricing. Mobilization costs will be prorated between TS Debbie and TS Fay. 3. All contractor invoicing and reimbursement requests for TS Debbie will be separate and distinct from TS Fay. Thank you for your time and consideration, J. Gary McAlpin, P.E. Collier County Coastal Zone management 239-252-5342 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records.. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. 00 not send electronic i mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing.