Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
EAC Agenda 08/07/2013
2013 Environmental Advisory Council Agenda August 7 , 2013 AGENDA /`�"/1 COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY,AUGUST 7,2013 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM,ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FLORIDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of July 3, 2013 meeting minutes V. Upcoming Environmental Advisory Council Absences VI. Land Use Petitions - None VII. New Business A. Petition to Amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan to re-designate Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District (RFMUD) Neutral Lands to RFMUD Receiving Lands, for property located on the north side of [the eastern terminal end of] Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (CR 862), approximately two (2) miles east of Collier Blvd. (CR 951) consisting of±554 acres commonly known as the Olde Florida Golf Club, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. (CP- 2013-4/PL20130000365)[TRANSMITTAL CONSIDERATION] VIII. Old Business IX. Council Member Comments A. Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan Subcommittee update X. Staff Comments A. Update on Environmental Advisory Council and Planning Commission Consolidation XI. Public Comments XII. Adjournment Council Members: Please notify Summer Araque (252-6290) no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 2, 2013 if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on a petition. General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. July 3, 2013 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Naples, Florida, July 3, 2013 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Environmental Advisory Council, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F," 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Andrew Dickman VICE CHAIRMAN: Gary McNally Michael V. Sorrell Brian Doyle ALSO PRESENT: Jeff Klatzkow, County Attorney Summer Araque, Sr. Environmentalist Specialist Jerry Kurtz, Stormwater and Environmental Planning Manager 1 July 3, 2013 • I. Call to Order Mr. Dickman called the meeting to order at 9:04AM. II. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. III. Approval of Agenda Mr. McNally moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Sorrell. Carried unanimously 4—0. IV. Approval of the June 5,2013 meeting minutes Mr. Doyle moved to approve the minutes of the June 5, 2013 meeting as presented. Second by Mr. Sorrell. Carried unanimously 4—0. V. Upcoming Environmental Advisory Council Absences Mr. Dickman reported his term on the Council is expiring in July and has applied to the BCC for reappointment. He thanked Staff and Council members for their service to the citizens of Collier County in advance of the BCC's decision to reappoint him. VI. Land Use Petitions None VII. New Business None VIII. Old Business A. Environmental Advisory Council and Planning Commission Consolidation Jeff Klatzkow, County Attorney provided the following Executive Summaries for information purposes: • "Recommendation to direct the County Attorney to advertise two ordinances which would effectively merge the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) into the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC). " • "Recommendation that the Board enact the proposed Ordinance Amendments for the purpose of effectively merging the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) into the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), and reducing the membership of the CCPC from 9 to 7 members, with 2 members being at- large environmental members. " He reported: • The concept for the merger was originally proposed by Commissioner Henning in an effort to reduce costs incurred by the County for review of land development applications. • The proposal is for the CCPC to fulfill the duties of the EAC by completing a comprehensive review of land use applications. 2 July 3, 2013 • The CCPC will be reconstituted as a 7 member Commission comprised of 1 member from each Commissioner's District and two members with expertise in environmental issues (hydrology and wildlife preservation). • The proposal is to be heard by the BCC on July 9, 2013 and effective October 1, 2013. • The Ordinance governing the EAC's powers and duties will be left"intact" so the County may revert to the previous process if a future determination is made the new format for review of land use applications is not functioning as intended. Council discussion occurred noting streamlining the process is beneficial to all involved as long as the County's environmental qualities are not sacrificed during the process. Staff reported the EAC will continue to function under the current Ordinance until such time a new Ordinance becomes effective. IX. Council Member Comments A. Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan Subcommittee Chairman Dickman provided a Transmittal of Memorandum dated June 5, 2013 from the Environmental Advisory Council—Re: "Low Impact Development" which incorporated a copy of the EAC's report on Low Impact Development. He reported the final recommendations contained in the report are: 1. Dedicate sufficient funding and staffing to complete the Collier LID strategy already underway by the staff-level working group described above (within the report). 2. Target the following LID techniques for initial implementation: bio retention swales,pervious pavers, green roofs, stormwater harvesting, sunken landscape islands in parking lots, and overflow grass parking areas. 3. Create a tax reduction incentive for any property owner that implements approved LID techniques which reduce the stormwater impact on the public structural stormwater management systems. 4. Establish and LID public information strategy. 5. Coordinate with the City of Naples to promote LID techniques to clean and protect shared receiving waters and estuaries that are impacted by polluted stormwater. The Memorandum will be forward to the BCC members individually and the Collier County Planning Commission. X. Staff Comments None XI. Public Comments None 3 July 3, 2013 There being no further business for the good of the County,the meeting was adjourned by the order of the Chair at 9:32 AM. COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Andrew Dickman, Chairman These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on as presented , or as amended 4 CP-2013-4,Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF AUGUST 7,2013 NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT Petition No's: CP-2013-4/PL-20130000365 Petition Name: Petition to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan to re-designate land from the Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District (RFMUD) Neutral Lands Designation to the RFMUD Receiving Lands Designation. [TRANSMITTAL MEETING] Applicant/Owner: Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. William Barton, Corporate Secretary Agents: Margaret Perry,AICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Coleman,Yovanovich&Koester,P.A. Engineering Consultant: Raymond Piacente, PMP, LEED AP Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Environmental Consultants: Thomas Trettis, PWS, CSE Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. II. LOCATION The ±554 acre subject property is located on north side of [the eastern terminal end of] Vanderbilt Beach Road, in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The Cypress Canal abuts the southerly boundary, and the northern terminal ends of 17th St. NW thru 23rd St. NW are across this stormwater management canal to south. III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Subject Site: The subject site is zoned A-MHO-RFMUO, Neutral Lands (Rural Agricultural District-Mobile Home Overlay, Rural Fringe Mixed Use-Neutral Lands Overlay) and designated Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands on the Future Land Use Map. The subject site is partially developed with a golf course and is elsewhere wooded lands. Surrounding Lands: North: Lands to the north of the subject site are zoned A-MHO-RFMUO, Receiving Lands and designated Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands on the Future Land Use Map. With the exception of scattered large-lot single-family residences built on - 1 - CP-2013-4,Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A Richmond Street, Krapke Road, Rivers Road and Moulder Drive, this area is also a portion of undeveloped TwinEagles AGR South. There are some nursery and land care businesses, horse stables and equestrian facilities, and other rural businesses in this area. The southern terminal ends of [all but one ofd these rural roads do not reach as far south as the subject site. The maximum density achievable for non-Rural Village Receiving Lands' development is 1 dwelling unit per acre, through participation in the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)program. West: Lands to the west of the subject site are zoned A-RFMUO, Receiving Lands and designated Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands on the Future Land Use Map. They are currently developed with a golf course (Golf Club of the Everglades). This neighbor has approached the County with the prospect of combining their property with the subject site to develop a unified residential community. The maximum density achievable for non-Rural Village Receiving Lands' development is 1 dwelling unit per acre, through participation in the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)program. South: Lands to the south of the subject site are zoned E-Estates, and designated Estates on the Future Land Use Map. This area is developed with single-family residences in the antiquated Golden Gate Estates subdivision. Residential density for residential estates is 1 dwelling unit per 2.25 acres, or 1 dwelling unit per legal non-conforming lot/parcel of record. East: The zoning on lands to the east of the subject site is split between A-MHO-RFMUO, Sending Lands-designated Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands on the Future Land Use Map (southerly portion), and A-MHO-RFMUO, Receiving Lands - designated Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands on the Future Land Use Map (northerly portion). A 300-foot wide linear Wildlife Corridor lies between the subject site and developable lands to the east. With the exception of a few residences, this area is undeveloped. This neighbor has submitted the preliminary plat plans to the County to develop a residential community, as TwinEagles Phase III. Density is limited to 1 dwelling unit per 40 acres, or 1 dwelling unit per legal non-conforming lot/parcel of record, in Sending Lands. The maximum density achievable for non-Rural Village Receiving Lands' development is 1 dwelling unit per acre,through participation in the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)program. In summary, the existing land uses in the area immediately surrounding the subject site are predominantly undeveloped or sparsely developed rural-type residential. The Receiving Lands FLUM designation allows the same land uses in these areas as proposed on the subject site, except to the south and except on the Sending Lands to the east. IV PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Petition seeks to amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan to re-designate the subject site from Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District (RFMUD) Neutral Lands to RFMUD Receiving Lands, affecting approximately 553.7 acres. This re-designation would allow for an increase in residential density from 1 dwelling unit/5 acres to 1 dwelling unit/acre for non-Rural Village development, through participation in the TDR program, and would decrease the native vegetation retention requirement from 60% to 40%. - 2 - CP-2013-4,Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY Background and Considerations- History of the Rural Fringe GMP Amendments: The Governor and Cabinet issued a Final Order on June 22, 1999, pertaining to GMP amendments adopted in 1997 pursuant to the 1996 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). The Final Order required the County to conduct a Rural and Agricultural Assessment for the Rural and Conservation Designated lands within the County, and then adopt measures to protect natural resources such as wetlands, wildlife and their habitats, and prevent the premature conversion of unique agricultural lands to other uses. This was to be accomplished while directing incompatible land uses away from these sensitive lands by employing creative land planning techniques. The Final Order allowed the County to conduct this Assessment in phases. Accordingly, the County divided the Assessment into two geographical areas, the Rural Fringe Area and the Eastern Lands Area. Relevant to this petition, the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) was established. The RFMUD represents a transitional area between Golden Gate Estates and the County's urban area, and between the urban area and vast agricultural lands and agricultural operations farther to the east. The RFMUD consists of approximately 73,222 acres and is divided into three distinct designations: Sending Lands (+ 41,535 ac. orig.; ± 41,414 ac. now), Receiving Lands (+ 22,020 ac. orig.; ± 22,373 ac. now), and Neutral Lands (+ 9,667 ac. orig.; ± 9,427 ac. now). Allowable uses, density, and preservation standards vary by designation. Note: If Olde Florida Golf Club amendment is adopted, acreage figures would be closer to: Sending Lands (+ 41,414 ac.) - no change, Receiving Lands (+ 23,128 ac.), and Neutral Lands (+ 8,873 ac.). Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species. The preservation standard for non-NRPA (Natural Resource Protection Area) Sending Lands is eighty percent(80%) of the native vegetation on site while the standard for NRPA Sending Lands is ninety percent (90%). Density is limited to 1 dwelling unit per 40 acres or 1 dwelling unit per legal non-conforming lot/parcel of record (created on or before June 22, 1999). Transfer of development rights from Sending Lands may occur at a rate of 1 dwelling unit credit per five acres (0.2 du/ac.) or 1 dwelling unit per legal non-conforming lot/parcel of record- or as much as 4 dwelling unit credits per five acres or lot of record with use of density bonus credits. Permitted non-residential uses are limited to: agricultural uses, consistent with the Florida Right to Farm Act; habitat preservation and conservation uses; passive parks and other passive recreational uses; sporting and recreational camps; limited essential services; and oil extraction and related processing. Receiving Lands are those lands identified as being the most appropriate for development and to which residential units may be received from areas designated as Sending Lands. The preservation standard for Receiving Lands, except for the North Belle Meade Overlay, is forty percent (40%) of the native vegetation present, not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total site area to be preserved. The base residential density (non-Rural Village development) is 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres (0.2 du/ac.) or 1 dwelling unit per legal non-conforming lot/parcel of record. The maximum density achievable for non-Rural Village development is 1 dwelling unit - 3 - CP-2013-4,Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A per acre, through the Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs). The minimum and maximum density for Rural Village development within Receiving Lands is 2 dwelling units per acre and 3 dwelling units per acre, respectively, except that the minimum density for Rural Village development on Receiving Lands within the North Belle Meade Overlay is 1.5 dwelling units per acre. Permitted non-residential uses are primarily the same as those uses permitted in the agricultural zoning district prior to the Final Order in 1999 (e.g. full range of agricultural uses, community facilities,recreational uses, etc.). Neutral Lands are those lands suitable for semi-rural residential development. Generally,Neutral lands have a higher ratio of native vegetation than lands designated as Receiving Lands, but do not have values approaching those in the Sending Lands. The preservation standard for Neutral Lands is sixty percent (60%) of the native vegetation present, not to exceed forty-five percent (45%) of the total site area to be preserved. The maximum residential density is limited to 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres (0.2 du/ac.) or legal non-conforming lot/parcel of record. These lands are "neutral" to the TDR program and do not generate or receive residential density. Permitted non-residential uses are primarily the same as the uses permitted in the agricultural zoning district prior to the Final Order in 1999 (e.g. full range of agricultural uses, community facilities, recreational uses, etc.). Considerations Specific to the Olde Florida Golf Club: The Olde Florida Golf Club property lies within the Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD), Neutral Lands, as depicted on Collier County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Neutral Lands designated areas allow golf courses and single-family residential units by right. Olde Florida Golf Club was approved by Conditional Use in 1999, and in November 2001, by Site Development Plan (AR-1383). The 18-hole golf course, its clubhouse and maintenance facilities occupy the developed portions of the subject site. An existing conservation area comprising approximately 51 acres would remain unchanged. The County's Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program provisions were not applicable at the time of Olde Florida original approval. TDR program provisions apply only to extent that they presently prohibit the transfer of development rights into or out of Neutral Lands. If approved, the Olde Florida development would be eligible to utilize not only the base density entitlements generated by developing property located in Receiving Lands but also the TDR entitlements accompanying the new FLU designation, as the transfer of development rights into the development would no longer be prohibited. Environmental Impacts: Collier County Department of Natural Resources personnel reviewed this petition and provided the following analysis: The GMP amendment proposes to change the FLUM designation of Olde Florida Golf Club from RFMUD Neutral Lands to RFMUD Receiving Lands. The applicant states that adoption of the amendments would allow the petitioner to utilize TDRs from RFMUD Sending Lands and add residential density in the Olde Florida Golf Club. Environmental information submitted with the application, are as follows: - 4 - CP-2013-4, Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A 1. FLUCFCS Code map with standard modifiers identifying percent exotic and nuisance vegetation coverage 2. Native vegetation retention calculations based on the updated FLUCFCS Code map, and information in accordance with Ordinance No. 10-08 3. Listed species survey for the site, dated October 15, 2008 4. A list of state and federal listed species know to inhabit biological communities similar to those found on site 5. SFWMD and USACOE wetland jurisdiction determinations 6. Cultural resource summary and assessment for the site According to the application submitted, the subject property is 553.7 acres in size. The FLUCFCS Code map provided identifies 88.4 acres of native vegetation within the golf course, 51 acres of native vegetation in existing conservation easement and 246.8 acres of native vegetation outside the golf course, for a total of 386.2 acres of native vegetation on subject property. Exotic vegetation within the native vegetative communities on site are primarily in the E2 (25-49%) range, with some areas of El (0-24%) and E3 (50-74%). The same is true of the level of exotic vegetation in the existing conservation easement. According to the Property Appraisers website, the Olde Florida Golf Club is divided into two parcels. The golf course parcel (parcel No. 00219400103) is 254.84 acres and future development parcel (parcel No.00219160003), 299.16 acres. The approved site plans for the Olde Florida Golf Club Clubhouse Facility Expansion (SDPA-2010-1104) required exotic vegetation to be removed from the golf course parcel and for it to be maintained free of exotic vegetation in perpetuity. The Olde Florida Golf Club occupies most of Section 31 and falls within one of two Sections of land in Sections 31 & 32, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, both of which were designated as Neutral Lands when the RFMUD was created. These two Sections of land are surrounded by RFMUD Receiving Lands and Estates (Golden Gate Estates). Growth Management Plan amendment number CP-2004-2 for the TwinEagles South property changed the FLUM designations of land immediately to the east of Olde Florida Golf Club, from Neutral Lands to Receiving Lands (153 acres) and Sending Lands (79 acres). The 79 acres of Sending Lands approved with the GMP amendment are located at the southern terminus of the property, adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Road and the golf course at Olde Florida Golf Club. Although not part of the application package, there is a verbal agreement between the owners of TwinEagles South and the local wildlife special interest groups to retain a 300 foot wide wildlife corridor along the west side of TwinEagles South. This wildlife corridor starts by the wildlife underpass at Immokalee Road and terminates at the Sending Lands along Vanderbilt Beach Road, at the southern end of TwinEagles South. This wildlife corridor runs alongside the east side of the existing conservation easement and golf course on Olde Florida Golf Club. The listed species survey identified gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), American alligator (Aligator mississippensis) and several listed species of wading bird on subject property. Seventeen active and inactive gopher tortoise burrows were found in the undeveloped area on the west side of the property, in the future - 5 - CP-2013-4,Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A development parcel. The listed wading birds and American alligator were observed in the gold course stormwater management lakes. Undeveloped land within the Olde Florida Golf Club and in Sections 31 & 32, are within the USFWS Panther Secondary Zone. No panther or signs of panther were observed on the subject property during the listed species survey. According to the Listed Species Survey Report, two collared panthers have occurred within 1.3 mile of the subject property (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) telemetry data). Panther and black bear telemetry points provided in the Listed Species Survey Report show most panther and black bear activity beyond two miles from the subject property, primarily on undeveloped lands adjacent to and within RFMUD lands to the north and south, and in the Golden Gate Estates along Everglades and Desoto Boulevards. The wetland jurisdictional determinations provided, show wetlands on site being drained by the major canals in the area and converting to uplands. According to the Formal Determination of Wetlands and Surface Waters received from the State, 30.88 acres of jurisdictional wetlands occur on the property, within the future development parcel. The Determination also states that habitats within the existing 38.71 acre conservation easement on site were excluded from the application, and thus not included in the Formal Determination. The loss of jurisdiction wetlands on the property is documented by the jurisdictional wetland determinations provided with the application. Pursuant to the Supreme Court ruling, USACOE jurisdiction wetlands on site are no longer jurisdictional since they are not connected to waters of the United States. Wetlands on site are also not within flowways or connected to wetlands off-site. In March, 2013, the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. conducted a reconnaissance cultural resource assessment of the site, in accordance with the specifications set forth in Chapter IA-46, F.A.C. One archaeological site, 8CR1305, was recorded as a result of the assessment and can be characterized by two non-local chert flacks found on a disturbed surface. These flacks are consistent with the Archaic Period (ca. 7,000 to 3,000 BP (before present)), and likely represent a small prehistoric camp. According to the assessment, the site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places due to the paucity of the material and disturbances associated with the site. The cultural resource assessment also states that the parcel has an overall low to medium probability for cultural resources,based on the field reconnaissance and aerial imagery. The consultant's site review with the Florida Division of Historic Resources determined no previously recorded archaeological sites on the subject property. In summary, the subject property and land within Section 31 & 32, Township 48 South, Range 27 East are surrounded by RFMUD Receiving Lands and Estates (Golden Gate Estates). These designations allow for a greater percentage of land to be developed and will, in time, reduce use of the subject property by larger free roaming listed species of wildlife such as panther and black bear. Other lands designated Neutral in the RFMUD abut at least on one side land designated either Sending or Conservation, thus providing greater protection for native habitat in those areas and for viability of corridors for the movement of wildlife. The agreement between the wildlife special interest groups and owners of TwinEagles South does provide a wildlife corridor linking Olde Florida Golf Club to undeveloped land to the north, within Bonita Bay East Golf Club. - 6 - CP-2013-4,Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A One of the major purposes of the RFMUD is to preserve higher quality habitat for listed species, flowways and corridors for the movement of wildlife, in particular that for Florida panther and black bear. When the RFMUD was created, lands within the RFMUD were afforded greater protection based on the quality of habitat and location within the landscape. Although currently surrounded by native vegetation, areas around Sections 31 & 32 are allowed to be developed more intensely with less or, in the case of single-family residences in the Estates, no native vegetation required to be retained on individual lots. This will, in time, decrease the habitat value of the land and use of the subject property by listed species. Creation of a 300 foot wide wildlife corridor on the neighboring TwinEagles South property, coupled with the higher native vegetation retention requirement for Neutral Lands on the subject property will benefit wildlife, but may not be suitable for long term use by listed species such as panther and black bear, particularly when adjoining properties are all developed. Given this staff do not have strong evidence to support retaining the higher native vegetation retention standard for Neutral Lands on the subject property and find the subject property more consistent with the intent of RFMUD Receiving Lands. [Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist] VI. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NEVI) SYNOPSIS A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was [duly advertised, noticed and] held on Tuesday, July 16, 2013, 5:30 p.m. at the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District Headquarters, located at 14575 Collier Boulevard, Naples. Approximately seven persons other than the applicant's team and County staff attended, and heard the following information: The applicant's agent provided a full description of the proposed amendment to the group, including the two-step GMPA process, the Rural Fringe Mixed Used designation and the TDR program. Also overviewed was the history of the Olde Florida property. The presentation indicated that natural vegetation preserve areas already exist on the site - and they would not change as a result of residential development. The present golf course and proposed residential uses were described, particularly abandoning earlier plans to expand the 18- hole golf course to 36 holes. Although no firm plans are in place, residential development would be limited to a specific development sub-area. The Olde Florida Golf Club was more recently approached by the neighboring Golf Club of the Everglades with the prospect of combining the two properties to provide a unified residential community. Questions generated during the subsequent discussion focused on the nature of the changed environmental characteristics [progressively dryer conditions], how the existing on-site preserve area would be affected [not by new residential areas], and if future development would include different or additional access to Vanderbilt Beach Road [none are contemplated]. Also questioned was the County's timetable for extending Vanderbilt Beach Road eastward[not in its present financially feasible planning schedule] and the possibility of aggregating additional large tracts to establish a Rural Village[extremely improbable]. An "unrecorded" conservation easement located along the northeast side of the Olde Florida Golf Course property was questioned. [This is the 300 foot wide wildlife corridor discussed in the Environmental Impacts section above.] It was explained that this easement does exist and - 7 - CP-2013-4, Olde Florida Golf Club GMP Amendment—Transmittal Meeting AGENDA ITEM VII.A would remain in place, while any further recordation would be the responsibility of another party- At least one party in attendance expressed opposition to the proposal. The meeting was completed by 6:10 p.m. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner] VII. RECOMMENDATION That the Collier County Environmental Advisory Council forward Petition CP-2013-4 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve this petition for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. PREPARED BY: 1 J11 DATE: A ' ,A CORBY SC I T,AICP,P' 'CIPAL PLANNER COMPREHEN`IVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTME REVIEWED B : DAl'E: DAVID WEEKS,AICP, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: --. -�� DATE: _ MIKE BOSI,AICP, D RECTOR, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT APPR• I D BY: DATE: 7 - 2y- l3 NICK CASAL-1'GUI i A,ADMINISTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION PETITION NO.: CP-2013-4/PL-20130000365 Staff Report for the August 7,2013,EAC Meeting NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the September 19,2013, CCPC Meeting and November 12,2013, BCC Meeting. — 8 — Growth Management Plan Amendment(FLU Map Change) for Olde Florida Golf Club Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District— Neutral Lands to Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District—Receiving Lands Sufficiency Response Letter dated April 25, 2013 Cover/Submittal Letter dated February 22, 2013 Check in the amount of$16,700 (application fee) (note: included with initial submittal) Check in the amount of$1,500 (transportation review fee) (note: included with initial submittal) One CD containing the contents of this re-submittal Application for Request to Amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan, including Letter of Authorization (revised to reflect comments contained in sufficiency letter) List of Exhibits Exhibit A General Location Map including surrounding zoning and FLUE designations of lands within 300 feet Exhibit B Recent Aerial including source and date Exhibit C Existing FLUE Designation Exhibit D Proposed FLUE Designation Exhibit E Recent Aerial with FLUCCS and Native Habitat Acreage Exhibit F Soils Map Exhibit G Listed Species Summary Table Exhibit G-1 Listed Species Survey dated October 15, 2008 Exhibit G-2 SFWMD 1990 Wetland Determination Exhibit G-3 SFWMD 1992 Wetland Determination Exhibit G-4 SFWMD 2010 Wetland Determination Exhibit G-5 ACOE 1990 Wetland Determination Exhibit G-6 ACOE 1993 Wetland Determination Exhibit G-7 ACOE 2011 Wetland Determination Exhibit G-8 Color Photographs Documenting Current Site Conditions (Pages 1 -10) Exhibit H Collier County Archaeological/Historical Probability Map Exhibit H-1 Archeological Consultant Summary dated 4/23/13 Exhibits I Public Facilities Report and supporting exhibits, including: Exhibits I-1 Public Facilities Report thru 1-4 Exhibits 1-5 Utility Availability Map Exhibits 1-6 FIRM Data (or FEMA) Map Exhibit I-7 Locations of Wells, Future Well Fields and Cones of Influence Exhibit 1-8 Locations of Wells and Cones of Influence Exhibits 1-9 Availability of Service Request/Approvals from Utility Providers thru 1-19 Exhibit J Traffic Impact Statement Exhibit J-1 Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Intersection Analysis Exhibit K Deeds Exhibit L List of Owners COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Kevin G.Coleman NORTHERN TRUST BANK BUILDING Linda C.Brinkman Richard D.Yovanovich 4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH Matthew M.Jackson Edmond E.Koester SUITE 300 Jeffrey J. Beihoff William M.Burke NAPLES,FLORIDA 34103 Harold J.Webre Gregory L. Urbancic 239-435-3535 Caroline M. Magliolo Matthew L.Grabinski 239-435-1218 FACSIMILE Charles A.B.Thomson Craig D.Grider www.cyklawfirm.com David Kerem Michael D. Gentzle Writer's Email: Of Counsel: ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Kenneth R.Johnson April 25, 2013 Mr. Corby Schmidt, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Sufficiency Response to Growth Management Plan (GMP)Amendment Petition CP- 20I3-4 Comments;proposed Redesignation of RFMUD Neutral Lands to Receiving Lands Dear Mr. Schmidt, Pursuant to the review comments received from Collier County dated March 25, 2013 and April 8, 2013, our project team offers the following responses (in bold) for your review and approval of the subject GMP Amendment Application: Comprehensive Planning Comments related to the application form: Page 3 III.F. RFMU is a zoning "overlay district" — Correct response to read: "(A) Rural Agricultural District; "Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District—Neutral Lands". [emphasis added] III.H. As with "F" above, correct response to be: "Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District,Neutral Lands" IV.C. Correct to read: From: "Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands"To: "Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands" April 25,2013 2 Response: Page 3 of the Application has been revised to reflect the requested changes. Page 4 V.A.1. Response would likely read: "see Exhibit"A"or"refer to Exhibit"A" V.A.2. Response would likely read: "see Exhibit`B"or"refer to Exhibit"B" V.A.3. Response would likely read: "see Exhibit "A" or "refer to Exhibit "A"; OR, REFER TO EXHIBITS "A" & "B", GENERAL LOCATION MAP & AERIAL, HERE V.B.I Response would likely read: "see Exhibit"C" or"refer to Exhibit"C" V.C.1. Response would likely read: "see Exhibit"E"or"refer to Exhibit"E" V.C.2. Response would likely read: "see Exhibit "E" or "refer to Exhibit "E". Please note that the standard application form language regarding applicants providing "plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site" is non-instructive in this situation. In other application materials, the plant and animal species on the subject property are identified as evidence of significant hydrologic changes described. Providing a single sample of species known to a similar site does little to substantiate this claim. Prepare and submit at least one survey conducted prior to the changed conditions and at least one such survey conducted as, and/or after conditions changed. See also comments for "Exhibit G " below. Response: The application has been revised to identify the various components as Exhibits. Included with this submittal is Exhibit G-1, a copy of the Listed Species Survey Report for Olde Florida Golf Club dated October 15, 2008. The report references listed species that were documented occurring on the property and listed species that have potential to occur on the property. Pages 4 & 5 V.D.4 Expand this written response. Provide interpretative explanations of the map figures (presently) found in Exhibit "I". Provide the details regarding causes and changes impacting the site's characteristics. Then either include two sets of the raw data (particularly baseline conditions and long-term sampling) in this response that substantiates the actual events and physical changes pertaining to: • Surrounding canals(from County and Regional water management agencies); • Nearby water well-field (from County water service); • Hydrological "changes"; • Other relevant changes; and the direct effects and apparent results evident on the property; or, you may choose to reference such data here, and submit the actual support materials as inclusions to the application package. • Drier wetland areas and depressed water table; • Confirmation from the appropriate State and federal agencies that certain plant habitat(s) have been reclassified; • "significant"spread of vines and ivies; • Other measurable and quantifiable effects. April 25,2013 3 Application materials are lacking certain backup data that will be necessary for substantive approval. Submit real or anecdotal evidence that changes have been observed in the amount, variety and behavior of wildlife. Explain all efforts and practices to identify, protect and conserve your vegetative communities and wildlife habitat, in accordance with the LDC. Produce PUD monitoring reports, maintenance logs, water test results, historic and current photographic images of canals, preserves and other plant areas, and wildlife, as would be beneficial to illustrate conditions described in the written response to application item V.D.4. Establish a direct scientific cause and effect relationship between the hydrological conditions and vegetative habitats. Describe and discuss the Olde Florida Golf Club maintenance practices, protections and caretaking activities historically taking place on the subject property, especially in areas now identified where exotics or nuisance species are not under control. Response: Included with this submittal is Exhibit G-2, a copy of the original South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Wetland Delineation and correspondence letter dated August 8, 1990. Also included is Exhibit G-3, a copy of the revised SFWMD Wetland Delineation and correspondence letter dated May 28, 1992. Exhibit G-4, a copy of the current SFWMD Wetland Delineation and correspondence letter dated December 15, 2010, is also included with this submittal. Also included are Exhibit G-5, a copy of the original U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Wetland Delineation and correspondence letter dated May 14, 1990; Exhibit G-6, a copy of the revised ACOE Wetland Delineation and correspondence letter dated December 15, 1993; and Exhibit G-7, a copy of the current ACOE Wetland Delineation and correspondence letter dated July 6,2011. WilsonMiller, Inc. (Stantec) performed several site visits with SFWMD and ACOE field representatives over the years, has installed and monitored numerous groundwater monitoring wells and has provided state and federal agencies with the above-referenced data. The original wetland determinations, performed in the early 1990's, were based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation and approximately 245 acres of the site was considered jurisdictional wetlands by SFWMD and ACOE. The G-3 May 28, 1992 SFWMD Memo mentions grape vine and poison ivy dominating the understory throughout the transitional areas. The Memo also mentions the site hydrology altered by Immokalee Road and the Cypress Canal. The groundwater well data collected by Stantec over the years indicated a majority of the site does not meet the state and federal criteria for wetland hydrology or hydric soils criteria for wetland soils. Currently, SFWMD has asserted wetland jurisdiction over five (5) isolated areas totaling 30.88 acres. Four of the five wetland areas claimed by SFWMD are the result of surface soil removal years ago, creating depressions that retain surface waters for longer periods than would have the undisturbed surface areas. The fifth area, being approximately 19 acres located in the center of the undeveloped area west of the existing golf course, is also the result of surface disturbance. In this instance the natural surface flow to the south was partially blocked during the surface soil removal south of the 19 acre area, again causing surface water to be retained for longer periods than would have occurred in the natural undisturbed surface conditions. Please see the Project Site Description, Project Background and Wetlands on Exhibit G-4 page 2 of 4 of the December 21, 2010 SFWMD Staff Report for more detailed information. Currently, the ACOE considers the above-referenced five (5) scrape down April 25,2013 4 areas "isolated wetlands" and pursuant to the Supreme Court decision (SWANCC), isolated waters are not jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act. Please see the Project History and Jurisdictional Determination on Exhibit G-7 pages 1, 2, 3 and 6 respectfully of the July 6, 2010 ACOE Memorandum of Record for more detailed information. The G-7 July 6, 2011 ACOE Memorandum of Record (MOR) mentions the surrounding canals having a significant impact on the area's hydrology, as the site is bounded by the Cocohatchee Canal to the north, Curry Canal to the east and the Cypress Canal to the south. The MOR mentions the 1993 wetland boundaries were smaller based on the area's lowered water table. The MOR mentions the cypress trees are covered with poison ivy and ground cover dominated by muscadine grape that resemble other wetland areas in Golden Gate Estates where the hydrology has been removed. The MOR also mentions the groundwater well data submitted by Stantec tends to correspond with relative water levels in the Cypress Canal which is controlled between 9.75 and 10.5 feet, with ground elevation on the property varying from 13.5 feet in the north to 12.7 feet in the south. The Olde Florida Club project is not a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and no PUD monitoring reports, maintenance logs or water tests results were required. The native habitats within the undeveloped portions of Olde Florida Golf Club (Phase 2) were not required to be maintained by SFWMD, ACOE or Collier County. However, Phase 2 was fenced for the prevention of trespassing, poaching, and illegal dumping. Color photographs documenting current site conditions on the Olde Florida Golf Club site are included with this submittal as Exhibit G-8, pages 1 through 10. The photographs of cabbage palm and pine/cypress/cabbage palm habitats clearly show the ground cover dominated by muscadine grape and a combination of poison ivy and muscadine grape surrounding/strangling canopy and sub-canopy species. The dominance of muscadine grape in the ground cover is often an indicator of lowered groundwater tables on a site. The photographs of the cypress habitats clearly show the sub-canopy dominated by cabbage palm and Brazilian pepper, indicating the historically wetland habitat is transitioning to a dryer community due to hydrological impacts. V.E.1.a. Response would likely read "see Exhibit "I" or "refer to Exhibit "I"-Potable Water" V.E.1.b. Response would likely read "see Exhibit "I" or "refer to Exhibit "I"-Sanitary Sewer" V.E.1.c. Response would likely read "see Exhibit "I" or "refer to Exhibit "I"-Arterial & Collector Roads;Name of specific road and LOS" V.E.1.d. Response would likely read "see Exhibit"I"or"refer to Exhibit"I"-Drainage" V.E.l.e. Response would likely read"see Exhibit"I" or"refer to Exhibit"I"-Solid Waste" V.E.1.f. Response would likely read "see Exhibit "I" or "refer to Exhibit "I"-Parks: Community and Regional" V.E.2. Response would likely read"see Exhibit"I"or"refer to Exhibit"I" V.E.3. Response would likely read"see Exhibit"I"or"refer to Exhibit"I" April 25,2013 5 Response: The application has been revised to identify the various components as Exhibits. Page 6 V.P.I. Response would likely read "see Exhibit "I" or"refer to Exhibit"I" V.F.2. Response would likely read "see Exhibit"I"or"refer to Exhibit"I" V.F.3. Response would likely read"N/A" V.F.4. Response would likely read "N/A" V.F.5. Response would likely read "N/A" Response: The application has been revised to identify the various components as Exhibits. Comprehensive Planning Comments related to specific exhibits All of the Exhibits should be labeled in the lower right corner of each Exhibit page for ease of finding and consistency throughout. Show dates on exhibits reflecting their dates of preparation. Show the subject property location on map figures —preferably by outlining its shape and size to scale. Realize that the reviewers of this application will include lay persons, including members of the EAC, CCPC, and the BCC. Response: All exhibits are labeled. Exhibit G. (Listed Species Summary Table) This petition seeks re-designate RFMUD Neutral Lands (with certain "before" characteristics) to RFMUD Receiving Lands (with certain "after" characteristics). Application exhibit does not present it in "before" and "after" form, considered necessary to evaluate the request. See also comments for "V.C.2. " above. Response: Included with this submittal is Exhibit G-1, a copy of the Listed Species Survey Report for Olde Florida Golf Club dated October 15, 2008. The report references listed species that were documented occurring on the property and listed species that have potential to occur on the property. Exhibit I. (Public Facilities Report) Application exhibit provides the public facility level of service information associated with Application Section "E". Exhibit I also currently provides map figures that are not associated with public facilities. These appear to be pages copied from a "CDM"-prepared 2008 plan update and an un-labeled FEMA flood zone map combined with letters confirming availability of certain public services to the site. Separate this exhibit in to two or more individual exhibits that are clearly connected to separate submittal requirement entries or groupings, re-label and properly reference in application page entries. Clearly explain an exhibit's relevance and always accompany an exhibit with an interpretation. More than one item [an exhibit within an exhibit] is labeled the same. Modify letters, labeling and exhibits to properly reference items made part of the application package. April 25,2013 6 Generally, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the justification and the need for this amendment. Staff's approach is to look for conclusive data and analysis to that effect. A GMP amendment such as this will also be evaluated for impacts upon infrastructure, compatibility considerations, etc. It is particularly important that application materials assess and report any impact, however small, on surrounding properties. Response: The various exhibit pages contained in Exhibit I have been renumbered accordingly. Below is a brief explanation of each exhibit herein,and its relevance to the project and the proposed amendment. Exhibits I-1 - 1-4: Identifies the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and the impact of the changes proposed with this amendment on the public facilities, including potable water,sanitary sewer,drainage,solid waste,community and regional parks,county jails and emergency medical facilities. Please note this Public Facility Report (Exhibits I-1 thru I-4) does not specifically address the LOS and the impact on arterial and collector roads. Analysis for these public facilities is provided within the enclosed Traffic Impact Statement,which is identified as Exhibit J. Li summary, the proposed amendment poses no negative impact to the public facilities identified above. Exhibit I-5: Identifies the various special hazard areas or flood zones relating to the subject property. Exhibits I-7- 1-8: Utilizing the 2008 Water Master Plan Update prepared by CDM, the locations of existing and proposed wells, cones of influence and potential wellfield areas adjacent to the project have been identified. In summary, the facilities shown in the provided exhibits, and adjacent to the project, identify the County's raw water supply wells and potential future areas which support the drinking water supply to the public. Since it is likely that any future development would utilize the existing Collier County potable and sanitary services, additional potable water wells and septic systems to support any future development would not be necessary. Exhibits I-9- 1-19: Availability of Service Requests and Responses from Utility Providers, including Collier County Public Utilities, Florida Power & Light, Comcast, CenturyLink and Golden Gate Fire Control &Rescue District. In summary, Utility Providers have no objections with the proposed amendment and can provide service to the project. Prepare and submit an analysis of the impact approval of the proposed amendment will have on the County's Transfer of Development Rights program. April 25,2013 7 Response: The TDR program is a voluntary program and the success of the program has been and is based on market conditions. In order to achieve a successful TDR program, willing sellers and buyers are necessary. By designating additional lands as receiving areas provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer their TDR's, furthering the goal of converting sending lands to a conservation use. Public Utilities Planning and Project Management Sufficiency Comments: This application package is adequate and sufficient to enable staff to conduct a formal [substantive] review concerning public utilities. Response: Acknowledged. Transportation Planning Sufficiency Comments: Collier County Transportation Planning staff has not completed their review of the traffic study/impact statement for completeness, and their determination and comments on sufficiency matters remain pending and forthcoming. April 2, 2013 Update: Collier County Transportation Planning staff has completed their review of the traffic study/impact statement for completeness The Olde Florida Golf Club GMPA CP- 2013-4 can be found sufficient for review purposes. The (Stantec) TIS [dated April 1, 2013] should supersede the TIS in the document that was distributed to Staff [paraphrased] Response: For clarification purposes, the submittal of April 1, 2013 was an intersection analysis of Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard; it was submitted to supplement the original TIS; it does not supersede the original TIS. Stormwater and Environmental Planning Sufficiency Comments: This application package is not adequate and sufficient to enable staff to conduct a formal [substantive] review concerning environmental matters. The application package provides a FLUCFCS Code map with standard modifier identifying percent exotic and nuisance vegetation coverage for environmental review. Also provided are native vegetation retention calculations based on the FLUCFCS Code map provided. A listed species survey for the site is not provided, but a list of state and federal listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those found on site is. Provide a listed species survey, and historic and archaeological survey for the property, as required on the standard application for GMP amendments. In addition to being used by staff, I'm sure the review boards and public will also want to see this information. Also provide the wetland jurisdictional determination(s)pertaining to the subject property. Response: Included with this submittal is Exhibit G-1, a copy of the Listed Species Survey Report for Olde Florida Golf Club dated October 15, 2008. The report references listed species that were documented occurring on the property and listed species that have potential to occur on the property. The current South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) jurisdictional wetland determination and correspondence letter is included as April 25,2013 8 Exhibit G-4. The current U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) jurisdictional wetland determination is included as G-7. Included with this submittal is Exhibit H-1, the Archaeological Consultant Summary dated April 23, 2013. The applicant will provide the full report when received from the Consultant, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc.; however, the summary is sufficient for moving the application forward through the review process. Closing remarks: The original application and copies are available for pick-up (one copy is kept for the file). Once the petition has been modified/enhanced to address the above items, re-submit the original plus four copies, all properly assembled, for a second sufficiency review. Paragraph C. of Resolution No. 12-234 provides 30 days for you to respond to this letter with supplemental data. Since there is uncertainty as to the timing of this application moving forward to transmittal hearings, the applicant may wish to request a second 30 day time period, in accordance with Resolution No. 12-234, beyond 30 calendar days from the date of this letter to remedy the deficiencies. Also, note that this is not a substantive review and that the substantive review will not be completed until this application has been found sufficient. Response: Acknowledged. Very truly yours, i Richard Yovanovich cc: William Barton COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Kevin G.Coleman NORTHERN TRUST BANK BUILDING Linda C.Brinkman Richard D.Yovanovich 4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH Matthew M.Jackson Edmond E.Koester SUITE 300 Jeffrey J.Beihoff William M.Burke NAPLES,FLORIDA 34103 Harold J.Webre Gregory L.Urbancic 239-435-3535 Caroline M.Magliolo Matthew L.Grabinski 239-435-1218 FACSIMILE Charles A.B.Thomson Craig D.Grider www.cyklawfirm.com David Kerem Michael D.Gentzle Writer's Email: Of Counsel: ryovanovich @cyklawfirm.com Kenneth R.Johnson February 22,2013 Marcia R.Kendall Senior Planner Growth management Division/Planning&Regulation Planning and Zoning Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,Florida 34104 RE: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Dear Ms.Kendall, We are submitting an application to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan on behalf of Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. One original and five copies are being provided to you,along with checks in the amount of$16,700(application fee)and$1,500(transportation review fee). The application proposes the redesignation of the 554-acre site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District—Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District—Receiving. The property is predominantly surrounded by receiving lands and due to the change in the environmental condition of the property, changing the designation to receiving lands is appropriate. In addition, designating additional lands as receiving lands provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer their TDR's,furthering the goal of converting sending lands to a conservation use. If you have any questions about this application or need additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me or Margaret Perry at Stantec (239-649-4040). We look forward to working with your staff in the processing of this application. V' 1 tru— yours, A.� Richard Yovanovich cc: William Barton,w/enclosures APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400(Fax 239-252-2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18(both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant William Barton, Corporate Secretary Company Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. Address 9393 Vanderbilt Beach Road City Naples State FL Zip Code 34120 Phone Number 239-641-7941 Fax Number 239-262-0334 B. Name of Agent* Richard Yovanovich, Esg. • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Coleman, Yovanovich, & Koester, PA Address Northern Trust Building; 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-3535 Fax Number 239-435-1218 B. Name of Agent" Margaret Perry, AICP • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Address 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 City Naples State FL Zip Code 34105 Phone Number 239-649-4040 Fax Number 239-643-5716 C. Name of Owner(s)of Record Same as applicant. Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number 1 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. Transportation: Jeff Perry, AICP Environmental: Thomas Trellis, PWS, CSE Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Engineering: Raymond Piacente, PMP, LEED AP Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL,Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock This is an equity owned club in which each of the 209 members own 0.478%of the corporation. The corporation is a "C", for profit corporation. Please refer to Exhibit L, List of Equity Members as of 2/13/13. Corporate officers are: Thomas Kukk, President; Donald Vining, Vice President; William Barton, Secretary; and Clyde Quinby, Treasurer C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE,with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership N/A Date of Contract: 2 F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address N/A G. Date subject property acquired (x)leased 0: 1993 and 1997 Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: . H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION All of Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, less the east Y2 of the northeast 1/4, Collier County, Florida B. GENERAL LOCATION North side of Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension; approximately two miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951). C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Rural Estates D. TAZ 217 E. SIZE IN ACRES 553.7 F. ZONING (A) Rural Agricultural District; Rural Fringe Mixed Use Overlay District- Neutral Lands G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN Golf course and single family residential H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S)Agricutural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT(S)TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element x(map only) Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE(S) OF THE ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: N/A C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands 3 TO Rural Frinae Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S)AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name& Page#) N/A E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: N/A V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE:ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN 1"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE See Exhibit A Provide general location map showing surrounding developments(PUD, DRI's, existing zoning)with subject property outlined. See Exhibit B Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. See Exhibit A Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION See Exhibit C Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s)of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. Please also see Exhibit D, Proposed FLUE Designation. C. ENVIRONMENTAL See Exhibits E & F Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE:THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A"ABOVE. See Exhibits G &G-1 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish &Wildlife Service)and State (Florida Game& Freshwater Fish Commission)listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site(e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. Please also see Exhibits G-2 through G-7, previously approved SFWMD and ACOE wetland determinations; Exhibit H, Collier County Archaeoloaical/Historical Probability Mao, and Exhibit H-1, Archeological Survey. D.GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2(Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential 4 increase in County-wide population by more than 5%of population projections?(Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.)or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district?(Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A,C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-11.007, F.A.C.) Response: The proposed change from Rural Fringe Mixed Use-Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use- Receiving could allow for an increase in density for residential uses through the use of the TDR program. A maximum density of one unit per acre could be achieved through the TDR program if the property is changed to Receiving. Commercial or industrial development is not contemplated with this GMP amendment. The Olde Florida Golf Club was constructed in a region of Collier County that has undergone significant hydrologic alterations from the surrounding canals and nearby County water well-field.The Cocohatchee Canal, north of the project,effectively drains sheet flow to the west. The Curry Canal,to the east,and the Cypress Canal,to the south,surround the property and have a significant impact on the area's hydrology. The typical wetland Cypress and Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm habitats on the site are now considered non-jurisdictional to the State and Federal agencies.The depressed water table has allowed nuisance and exotic plant species to begin to dominate many of the habitats. There is also a significant spread of grapevine and poison ivy that are smothering habitats,climbing and strangling trees. Cabbage palms continue to proliferate the canopy and sub-canopy in many habitats and reduces the suitability of the site for wildlife utilization by some species. The property is predominantly surrounded by receiving lands and due to the change in the environmental condition of the property, changing the designation to receiving lands is appropriate. In addition,designating additional lands as receiving lands provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer TDR's furthering the goal of converting sending lands to conservation use. E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard(LOS)and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: See Exhibits I-1 thru 1-4 Potable Water See Exhibits I-1 thru 1-4 Sanitary Sewer See Exhibits J &J-1 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS See Exhibits I-1 thru 1-4 Drainage See Exhibits I-1 thru 1-4 Solid Waste See Exhibits I-1 thru 1-4 Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. See Exhibit I-5 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property(i.e. water, sewer, fire 5 protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. See Exhibits 1-1 thru 1-4 Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, & Exhibits 1-9 thru I-19 and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: See Exhibit 6 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data(FIRM). See Exhibits 1-7 thru 1-8 Location of welifields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N/A High Noise Contours(65 LDN or higher)surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable(identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION x $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) N/A $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) See Exhibit K Proof of ownership(copy of deed) Attached to Application Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner(See attached form) x 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1"=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. 6 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN I hereby authorize Richard Yovanovich, Esa. and Margaret Perry, AICP (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent i a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting propert ( tified in his Application. Signed: - Date: /`j—/Z) (Name of Owner(s)of Record) William Barton, Corporate Secretary I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowled • Signature of Applicant Name-Typed or Printed William Barton, Corporate Secretary STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Sworn to nd s bscribe. •ef. e me this / 9 day of February, 2013 by Sworn ' r�� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Y Notary Public w 4';:4 •11k,ry COLLEEN C.I FFERBER CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: : u l M'rCOMMISSION S #EE 081174E =�•• - d EXPIRES:May 3,2015 %?of Bondad Thtu Notary Public Underwriters x who is personally known to me, who has produced as identification and 1/ did take an Oath did not take and Oath NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of%500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 7 •. 1_ __ 1 r , __J • • . -40 . 10 ■ ■ Er WIN ■ 11111 1111 111 RE ■ Z III Illa 1111111 1111 ill I NI % s r 111110_,_41.4,Vi 111111111 x 0 ■111111111111TM 11111111.111111111111. MINIM g gro larmicialm :4z- Nal, lii 10.1 800► • `` ` fc Y I PROJECT \ BOUNDARY 1 .- 1111111111 H OLDE R-ORDA GOLF CLUB ZONING A-RURAL AGRICULTURAL I A I a FLU: RFMUD-NEUTRAL il-300' RI. GOLF CLUB CF THE a 1 ZONING EVERGLADES 11 r:1 • A-MHO ZONING A N I FLU: t ■ FLU: NI RFMUD- • II RFMUD-RECEMNG I SENDING 3W � �._: = = -�. : � ZONING E-ESTA S ��.1 t- — v milumilimilmilill VA . 111.11111 111111611111 ■ w^ c 7.1e ! =-- X13 Si ORIGINAL SHEET — ANSI A 215611377 Client/Project Stantec OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB 0 3200 BAILEY LANE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NAPLES, FL (FLU MAP CHANGE) Figure No. 34105 EXHIBIT A Tel. 239.649.4040 Title Stantec Fax. 239.643.5716 GENERAL LOCATION MAP www.stantec.com — � !S r�J.=, ...[awr r ..,rr . i .r1 r a t ,w^ n ' 4.14'; 4.441 ., ..- r +' f ^ ! ; '' `C -` '' 7t `.4, x9... .�' r 1�r� . r •ww ._ ry4 C �fy 4 r .:..t ;E*4 1s , ,".�.„ :'tits ' of '.�.�'N?,7 k �r4. :� ■r 'Y s: .. ' '- Qn. a:'.0.i,'.; �k.. v✓• ti I•",Sa Y L.,t�. . • .# A, %--^:;:t,„'''3. 3{ 32•25 ' '7' , tt \; , Y '4 'r ,ti , t .� ` _ :' i PROJECT BOUNDARY �.� �ter'- � • •s (TYP} +, -` t- ;K C, t .wt F ., 1-:+•*v.. it `ER 4-..,,,,',4n-,te --"‘?.--•,,, . }- 4^t:�,. as- 'ib`'`-t '>-7, ,;^",'"y �'`. •r r5c'�y"� ;,-r?« + ,. t,� . t y.,t ,, a.$4.:A7- 44,3+ A44,3. 1 1 d ti •a y� fµ s♦ r c � � • Kt t r' �, 3'! k 7:': Stm t "I. :i+�L ,h -.(�,;�"' a•.•; >• Y i �a+ r • 3 .P ,,.4."" • _ a{ ..Yq ,rat.. +,..2r." �'. .:3.3w-r ? • E.. , '•4„ _t 4., « '4.r. f` GOLF CLUB' OLDE FLORIDA •LF CCU " .1 44. ' ' EVER s .:.,,r�, . >, . '�y. 1° , .. x- " •r .',, . - rr.- , 94"fit: .'S;Fr � "�` * ; f,._, -,.,h t 2.../7/11,06v,,44+ , j f.'' '+ . a` • "Ae'>c..-At. ;t. .ate""`' .....Pk.{ 4 • - sue.•'' .. v, X ice.. yt�� .a. �4f.n�rSA"'EM�ge'�. '� ' '=.L.,. ai 9 4yq# n'1y ns ,s + J .*ti,., ` ' - :w.,r' .i• "fix• a .ri el to 04 awamPAPPOOP - � v @....►s by t I r,• "'....1-.ayto n.' �'. -s . 1" p` ` � " • y t7. - 1 r :; *, J ,fiV ow -1 .. > V e Z 3 5 r ' :, ' "a • t k,r ,` a t n / �laa, yy t1 y. t a":.IG ` 't- „ xs il. .t"'� • „�4� +i{ ,, Y' a... . ,�.` t • o N i� G .` a,Y`, ya'"li.. '. k. '."£p ▪ -N.,•.;•• >t.'' n .”' ,'-4, .�;city •'^^°JLcw Y L� '° y.~ 4..,' y •'-• ' ••4'{`. 0. tr+ H may.h ? .4.,,,:._r t`�t # t• Ter', Y� 1L1) .. a l ' 4 �R�•� r +,,, � Firer h+� r rpr >. '� JA �� � •'mot A. f_-•00 • ti!j� �S+ -44; '-.t- • "--a r ale•i , 1� a s▪ • �� �(( 5 taw•{ a +nt 1 4 411, �' .S � sue j5.,-.'a .,•:'. 11,-4!•,--'„. .. ri. h -3t� x'A t'v tf�' ,�T ' LL,,•M)m t`..'`r'S �,. ., . 4,---.�" rrt ""-♦ i. 3-t T y r a }its �I�. •— 1•44v' ,..+4� • : 'IJ}O'cA,j 1• 1 r3 /4 , !' i. . ..-�:roc:y A .!r cSi '7'. 4:1,+4 $ -"�• v� i•'� '" +.�•�" {i .��py 5 .�..�a`: ""rYl�y,�y A+' 4* �`5 '��`. # +� t �}4��� � ��„�• �. �,.'•; �' ,t�'x V 5w•v .. ,+ N,,: *7„ "' ,4:4-',....�-' s• Pere i .;te a x ,.,--- .. <`�y,4 rF; *t ' �, . NM AERIAL DATE: 2012 FEB. 2013 �r ORIGINAL SHEET — ANSI B SOURCE: COWER COUNtt PROPERTY APPRAISER 21 561 1 377 5.IN i Client/Project rill Stantec OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB 3200 BAILEY LANE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NAPLES, FL (FLU MAP CHANGE) 34105 N0 EXHIBIT B StaiiteC Tel. 239.649.4040 �, Fax. 239.643.5716 AERIAL www.stantec.com c c • c 0 MOD FLU: RFMUD-RECEMNG „ . FLU: RFIVILD-RECEM t FLU: RnAUD-SENDING ' . FLU: ESTATES KE FLU: RFMUD-NEUTRAL .. .. ir - w 1r lir Iv 1111 r ,..■ , ro■ 0 ••■ I 1 ' •*1 --, >-, lk 1 • .•-411 i * It pRojEar ,..„. , , gla ■ ,N I BOUNDARY A - ■. • ..•8 * 1 — Li: RFAAUD-RECENING * • dil■, —1.414 4 • r 1 4 P' +1.• 114 : i 1,-& - k, ”'1—: , • I ■lip-t, _ .e.• __ _ . '-'7D , ■ FLU: it. 10 1 RFIAUD- -i ' : GOLF CLUB OF THE , . SENDING fc, EVERGLADES •.- . I FU: .„ nmem-REcavrga Li_i ':: ' A. AIL -4' 4.' 4. - 1■7.411111■- -cf.]/)3 2 ,en cr) ...4--- .... r .) GOLDEN GATE ESTATES; V 1 R-U: ESTATES .., dit 4P.T.• FEB. 2013 ORIGINAL SHEET — ANSI A 215611377 Wr 1MM IMOMMOMENNE Client/Project fi Stantec DE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB 3200 BAILEY LANE , OL 34105 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NAPLES FL (FLU MAP CHANGE) l Figure N EXHIBIT C Tel. 239.649.4040 Title Stantec Fax. 239.643.5716 EXISTING FLUE DESIGNATION www.stantec.com LEGEND FLU: RFUUD—RECEN1NG FLU: RFMUD-RECEMNG FLU: RflAUD—SENDING FLU: ESTATES KZ FLU: RFMUD—NEUTRAL 4. 11!" r 0") X PROJECT BOIIiDARY FLU RFIA-UECEIVIIG OLDE FLOFIDA GOLF CUB FLU: RFMUD-RECENHVG FLU: L'g GOLF CUE OF 11 L. RFMUD- 1,s1' EVERGLADES SENDING • FLU RRAUD-RECEIVNG s,cn k . • T BEACH RD 2 i=g r,Z20 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FLU: ESTATES -LA nog? 5rteNto EB. ORIGINAL SHEET — ANSI A F 2013 215611377 ,„..asta■ra, Client/Project Stantec DE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB 3200 BAILEY LANE (FLU GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NAPLES, FL ure (FLU MAP CHANGE) 34105 EXHIBIT D Tel. 239.649.4040 Title SteinteC Fax. 239.643.5716 PROPOSED FLUE DESIGNATION www.stantec.com ,..,.... c_ jfl ! ar e ..,,. D D O CD Fr; 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 dIIPIIIIIIIIIIHuIIIIIIIIII r m ��) D7 6 Z W i7 O A r O m < f�1 m mm TI° X co N,` '.o <_ s J- N N N 3 v 0- , o- L• m rn rn m m ro rD (n ro m a, rD al m m rc 3 3 Z m < �'j �+' �+) G) O N q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T N .63.N—(p, £ c v v . , £ w w oa % w cu v n, a v , rn rD O on O p m q q q Z N .� y o, a J J J J J ro m m m ro J ? v v a Cu a s o o D D D D D y:. N Q)TI v v00, n ' ' m 7 o ' < A m m m Cu' Cu a a a , m o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c, n - ro 73 m p D 8 �) 8 8 8 < ap W C W cp CO % a a „^, ? w w' 3 3 3 3 3 °» n °a °a a a a °tea a a n n n a a a a �, �jj rftr7nnl 0 Z Z Z Z m +t+■ 4,_o CD 0- 5 5 d d A a t [g m rry, m o 0 0 0 o O L1 M M Ll Gl M M M M M M M v v v T m �,�„ -- {) o 9 2 ,, m ,? O O co n' v Cr. x `° `° a Cu o=, w DJ '�^ '�^ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m m ran m 'c" r ° Z 5 2 2 m r4ri N(D O' c O 0 y ° O_ r- O_ a s p Ln Lr• O O J J > > > J J > > > J n Z (7 m 0 0 -I •.*. N 0 ~ -' -' 0 0 0 0 £ N N C O_ 0_ 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0 O_ O_ O_ 0 O O O O Z NO -. MC C O ' 0 � 0 0 ,0„ N 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 J A A A A _. a 0_ 0_ n a n 0_ a a 0_ 0_ 0_ C C C C c 1'' D O O D , co> a N O T T O O O O O A `O e o C ? C C C C C C C C C J J J J '^ N O m �l 0 .. d 0_ 0_ 0_ 0 * 0 0 2 . . . ,, A o r .. .- N E, ' N O O _. I''1 I''1 Z C J J J J J J J J J J J -, -, -, r a n 7 a 0. a n a a a a n n, m 2 J o m 0 O w o. \ x m x c m m nu, ro m m rD ro m '.• m m Z O > Z n < O Z m o 0 0 0 0 0 d �, o O o o v, c O Cr) O D C D 'y m N O O' O O j n O O O O O O O O O O O O < < .� O H H '� D C ?j: 0 A N . u+ in ',1,,.,' ..> < < < < < < < < < < < < T T m J r m ;(7 u m P._ N In In N N N Z m T T T O O O O g N A W m m m Z 0) O O O in N X X X X X X X X X ,� ,y .v X• O ° J •J V A A A N O O O O O O O O O O F ri t,' n N 17 O D [T� C .,, z •A A A Yo i0 A b . ' vi rn ' N D cn O e o 0 o a c J nn v^i H ti vOi vOi N N O O A m A C C C In O O - 'n N O O O O A A A A z O q O �p N N N O V V A A A A A A A A l0 o g O D g O Z O d Cu ? v A A lD t0 t0 l0 0 0 0 0 ° ° Z ?J Z N n J !f A 0 0 o e Z Z Z Z C CJJ a 111 A N 0 rD o Z Z Z Z G C E E J o lli N _ C C c :, H N Cu J D O u, O �n �n �n v� d d jD Z G, N N N n J J n Z W in 7 A D A n n n n A 0 r9 O O C .r. W _s?,..) -'' W _ `* o ro O rip rip N O yr A OJ 6� A d O In O llr, O A VI NJ A J m m > D D D D .„ 0 e _ A * A A A V, g n O O O n ,:f 0 o e o 2; • v O O On J . ••: Ns W. - 0 OF 4..,, ''V..% , _ 'vs.4,, .= .::""-','11:s":,:4..,''...rr..1‘‘: ss I ) s, r '-ter --- « d. w a. ",, 44 4 IV w,.. -- -) 164 i t wok is M . Z n tri 1' ` - _ __ —— �4N te Z ( ? CD H N / L 0 ef .LiJ N,NO jg M " .X > i II 4 2., x ° @ � - , L+J g (n o MI h� 1∎1 W i 18 W g . -:., „ ..a g•, N n r ij,' ( , N fig, g • > (-) , irr.,..it) _ M ,! , . . . ® t '' ' tiY � a ,. a a T OD V W 1111 . M e J { J 1.:101,0! , .,„ 1 1 r z. •� ' toll 4Vni8:31 yJ�►�(( /jV��y((f F�� 7' Y - 4,fit• r' : iiisriii . ol% # gi M ea ,,,,..,,,,,,,,, ,,. • W nr F � ti •:: ICJ t. ® • . gam Z o . 121 i l r , 1 s C n J g T r..gra 3q o i _ N C1 — 3Ru°c 3 O `'rt n / Q + k 4;••m Soil# Description 0 350 700 1,400 10 OLDSMAR FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM . Legend Feet ic 11 HALLANDALEFINESAND Q Property Boundary 18 RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM +I 21 BOCA FINE SAND NRCS Soils 49 HALLANDALE AND BOCA FINE SANDS 99 Water Y 1 c, I. rr.. a is f 99 \ : - :: if., , -.:-..---,-..--_ ... , ‘ipi. ' .- 4* • . ;. . , , . .•:,.-,„...,. a§`+ i r ` -c , r it 1 y S y A. 4 p:J 9t*,,...ii rt 99 ` 3 o � "� � � `�'� ,,.Y .-. t J -i T S'' - �* X1. l a +f. ,,f l - a 99 z ,- , t-", 1 i '-,,,r .i ".lam- . .P �v ,at „ °' -• 1 . ':u '` E xi • q i tw t k* ti' of 0-1 ra,,:_t. ..'"4 V,fft, ', to'ta0. . 9 — -- ri Stantec Consulting N RCS Soils Map The information on this map has been Compiled by Stantec staff from a variety of sources and is 3200 Bailey Lane,Suite 200 subject to change without notice.Stantec makes Naples,FL 34105 no representations or warranties,express or implied, tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6446 Olde Florida Golf Club to h accuracy,c infor ation.timeliness,or rights to the use of such information. Stantec Exhibit F V:.156UGWa,215811371'grn md,11377_OFGC_S011s 20110504_001 2182.mx6 One Team. Infinite Solutions. LISTED SPECIES SUMMARY- EXHIBIT G Listed Plants and Animals known to Inhabit or occur in Biological Communities similar to the site Big Cypress fox squirrel NL ST (Sciurus niger avicennia) Florida panther (Fells concolor corgi) FE FE I',;. F 47, 1771 �:4 VAT¢ I A,:,j American alligator FT(S/A) SSC (Alligator missippiensis) Eastern indigo snake FT(S/A) FT (Drymarchon corais couperi) Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) ST ST (Aram Limpkin NL SSC (Animus guarauna) Little blue heron NL SSC (Egretta caerulea) Reddish egret NL SSC (Egretta rufescens) Roseate spoonbill NL FT (Platalea ajaja) Snowy egret NL SSC (Egretta thula) Tricolored heron NL SSC (Egretta tricolor) White ibis NL SSC (Eudocimus albus) Wood stork FE FE (Mycteria americana) Rigid epidendrum NL E (Epidendrum ridigum) Hand fern NL (Ophioglossum palmatum) Stiff-leaved wild-pine NL E (Tillandsia fasciculata) Hoary air-plant NL E (Tillandsia pruinosa) Twisted air NL T (Tillandsia flexuosa) �I Reflexed wild pine NL T (Tillandsia balbisinia) Royal fern NL CE (Osmunda regalis) Page 1 FWS= U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services FWC=Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FE=Federally-designated Endangered FT=Federally-designated Threatened ST=State-designated Threatened SSC=Species of Special Concern FT(S/A)= Federally-designated Threatened species due to similarity of appearance CE=Commercially exploited NL=Not listed DOACS=Division of Agriculture and Consumer Services via Chapter 5-B-40, F.A.C. Page 2 OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB LISTED SPECIES SURVEY REPORT Prepared For: Olde Florida Golf Club 9393 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Naples, Florida 34120 Prepared By: WilsonMiller, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite # 200 Naples, Florida 34105 OCTOBER 15 , 2008 Exhibit G-1 10/13/2008-206828-Ver.2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 . INTRODUCTION 1 2 . VEGETATION SURVEY AND LISTED PLANT SPECIES 1 2.1. Vegetation Survey/Mapping Methodology 1 2.2. FLUCCS Categories Documented On site 2 3 . LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND RESULTS 3 3.1. Survey Methodology 3 3.2. Listed Plant Species Documented Onsite 4 3.3. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur Onsite But Were Not Observed 5 3.4. Listed Wildlife Species Documented Onsite 6 3.5. Listed Wildlife Species That Could Potentially Occur Onsite But Were Not Observed 6 3.6. Non-listed Species Documented Onsite (General Wildlife Observations) 7 4 . SUMMARY 8 4.1. Listed Plants 8 4.2. Listed Wildlife 8 5 . REFERENCES 9 Tables Table 1 - Listed Vegetation Species Survey 4 Table 2 - Listed plant species observed 5 Table 3 - Listed plant species that could potentially occur but were not observed 5 Table 4 - Listed wildlife species that could potentially occur but were not observed 7 Table 5 - List of non-listed wildlife species observed 7 10/13/2008-206828-Ver.2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 1 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report 1. INTRODUCTION The Olde Florida Golf Club project site encompasses approximately 552± acres and is located in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. A private 18-hole golf course with club house and maintenance facility has been constructed on a portion of the site. The property is bordered on the north by Calusa Pines Golf Club and undeveloped lands, on the east by undeveloped lands, on the south by the Cypress Canal and Golden Gate Estates, and on the west by Golf Club of the Everglades. The property is located in a rapidly developing region of Collier County. A Location Map, showing the approximate location of the subject property is included with this report as Exhibit A. WilsonMiller Certified Senior Ecologist Craig Schmittler and Certified Ecologist Justin Styer conducted a listed species survey of the project site using field methodology guidelines largely consistent with those established by both the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and Collier County Environmental Service Department. This survey included mapping the major vegetative habitats and performing meandering pedestrian transects searching for listed plant and wildlife species utilization of the subject property. In addition to the listed species survey, the ecologists also recorded notes regarding general wildlife observations which are presented in Table 5 of this report. 2. VEGETATION SURVEY AND LISTED PLANT SPECIES 2.1. Vegetation Survey/Mapping Methodology The dominant plant communities and land uses within the project limits were mapped by WilsonMiller ecologists utilizing field assessment methods. Vegetation mapping was performed utilizing color aerial photographs and ground-truthing of the project site. A detailed analysis of vegetative structure and composition of each habitat was performed during the site visits. The vegetative associations and land uses were classified in general accordance with the Department of Transportation's Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) manual, January 1999 edition. Refer to the included FLUCCS Map for the vegetative community types found on the site (Exhibit B). The primary factor contributing to alteration of native vegetative communities on the site is a change in site hydrology. With this change, opportunistic plant species (i.e. exotic and/or nuisance species) may establish and further negatively impact the native plant community. Natural site conditions on the property have been altered by human induced activities. Examples include the disruption of the historical hydrological sheet flow with the construction of the Cypress Canal to the south, construction of CR-951 and associated canal to the west, construction of Immokalee Road and Cocohatchee Canal to the north, development of surrounding areas, and a lowered groundwater table. Alteration of the hydrologic regime on the subject property most likely caused a change in the structure and composition of the native plant community, and may have provided an opportunity for exotic and nuisance vegetative species to become established. Exotic vegetation observed on the project site during the 2007 listed species survey include melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). Nuisance species such as Caesar-weed (Urena lobata), and muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) are also present. One or more of these exotic and/or nuisance species may be influencing the population distribution of the native plant communities on the project site. Levels of exotic plant infestations, based on their aerial cover, were mapped in conjunction with mapping of native vegetation associations and land uses. Code modifier suffixes are appended to descriptive FLUCCS codes to indicate the 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 2 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report approximate abundance of exotic species within a particular FLUCCS community. Code modifiers used for the site are shown below: E = Exotic Plant Species El = Exotics 10-24% E2 = Exotics 25-49% E3 = Exotics 50-75% E4 = Exotics >75% N = Nuisance Plant Species N1 = Nuisance species 10-24% N2 = Nuisance species 25-49% N3 = Nuisance species 50-75% N4 = Nuisance species > 75% 2.2. FLUCCS Categories Documented On Site The following is a list of the FLUCCS associations mapped on the Olde Florida Golf Club site, along with a brief description of each category. Golf Course (FLUCCS 182) - This category represents the existing golf course including golf cart paths, practice driving range, internal roads and paths, club house, and maintenance facility. Saw Palmetto Prairies— (FLUCCS 321) - These areas typically lack a canopy stratum and are dominated by a groundcover of dense saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) with scattered sub-canopy and herbaceous vegetation occurring scattered throughout. Sub-canopy species include rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), gallberry (Ilex glabra), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), and myrsine (Rapanea punctata). Groundcover vegetation includes saw palmetto, bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), winged sumac, shiny blueberry (Vaccinium myrsinites), myrsine, and muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia). Other Shrubs and Brush (FLUCCS 329) - This category describes several small areas immediately north of the Cypress Canal on the southern end of the property. These areas are dominated by Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), rayless golden rod (Euthamia minor), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), Caesar-weed, muscadine grape vine, broom sedge (Andropogon glomeratus) and scattered cypress (Taxodium distichum). Pine Flatwoods - Palmetto Understory - (FLUCCS 411) - These areas are dominated by a canopy of slash pine with a ground cover dominated by saw palmetto. Sub-canopy species include slash pine, winged sumac, cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), buckthorn (Bumelia tenax), myrsine, wax myrtle, dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), gallberry, and rusty lyonia. The dominant groundcover vegetation is saw palmetto with scattered pennyroyal (Pilob/ephis rigida), chocolate weed (Melochia corchorifolia), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), muscadine grape, winged sumac, love vine (Cassytha filiformis), Caesar-weed, dog fennel, gulfdune paspalum (Panicum monostachyum), chalky bluestem (Schizachyrium spp.), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), cabbage palm, snowberry (Chiococca a/ba), rustweed (Polypremum procumbens), and catbriar (Smilax bona-nox). Melaleuca, Brazilian pepper and downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosus) are also present in these areas. Pine Flatwoods - Graminoid Understory (FLUCCS 416) - These areas are dominated by slash pine in the canopy. Sub-canopy species include slash pine, cabbage palm, widely scattered cypress (Taxodium spp.), wax myrtle, cabbage palm, myrsine, American beautyberry, winged sumac, rusty lyonia, and dahoon holly. Groundcover species include 10/13/2008-206828-Ver 2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report Caesar-weed, broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), pennyroyal, muscadine grape, winged sumac, love vine, Caesar-weed, catbriar, myrsine, red bay (Persea borbonia), and ragweed. Brazilian Pepper (FLUCCS 422) - This habitat contains a dense monoculture of Brazilian pepper with very little other vegetation present. When other species are present they are limited to widely scattered swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and scattered willow (Salix caroliniana) and grape vine or poison ivy. These areas are typically associated with previously cleared or disturbed habitats on the property. Live Oak (FLUCCS 427) - This habitat includes areas where live oak (Quercus virginicus) dominantes the canopy. Other sub-canopy and ground cover species present include cabbage palm, slash pine, saw palmetto, grape vine, green briar, pennyroyal and other incidental ground cover species. Cabbage Palm (FLUCCS 428) - Relatively pure stands of cabbage palm may be found on the site. Some scattered live oak, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) and slash pine may also be present in the canopy. Subcanopy species include scattered live oak, myrsine (Myrsine floridana), red bay, and Brazilian pepper. Ground cover species include scattered saw palmetto, Boston fern (Thelypteris exaltata), wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa), shoebutton ardisia (Ardisia elliptica), poison ivy, American beautyberry, and myrsine. Western Everglades Hardwoods (FLUCCS 433) - This category represents one of the dominant habitat types found on site. Cabbage palm dominates this habitat, but cypress is relatively abundant in many areas. This habitat type was historically part of a large cypress-dominated slough. The construction of Immokalee Road and Cocohatchee Canal to the north and the excavation of the Cypress Canal on the southern property boundary resulted in significant and permanent alteration to the historic water table in this region of the county. The alteration of hydrology and decrease in hydro-period has resulted in an increase in the number of cabbage palms, transitional and upland vegetation throughout the general area. Cabbage palm now dominates most of the vegetative strata in this habitat, but cypress, occasional red maple (Acer rubrum), laurel oak and other incidental species are present. Grape vine forms a dense ground cover and thick mat in the ground cover in many of these areas. Previously Cleared/Disturbed Lands — (FLUCCS 740) - These areas are highly disturbed habitats that have been previously cleared and are dominated by nuisance and/or exotic vegetation. Grape vine and Brazilian pepper usually dominate these areas. These disturbed areas are used as disposal sites for much of the vegetative debris generated during routine golf course maintenance activities. Borrow Areas — (FLUCCS 742) - These areas include large, shallow excavations where the topsoil was removed in the past during the original golf course construction. These areas have been scraped down to the underlying limerock in most instances and vegetation is limited to nuisance and/or exotic species that can tolerate the fluctuations in water levels from summer to winter months. Most of these areas are dominated by dense Brazilian pepper with primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), willow and scattered herbaceous species that are seasonally present. 3. LISTED SPECIES SURVEY AND RESULTS 3.1. Survey Methodology Prior to field investigations, a literature search was performed and color aerials were reviewed to identify the various vegetative communities present on the project site. Information regarding listed plant and animals that have the potential to occur in habitats 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 4 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report onsite was obtained from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). The FWC's publication Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, Official List, December 1999, was reviewed to determine the current state and federal status of listed wildlife and plant species potentially present onsite. In-house FWC data is depicted on the enclosed FWC Regional Listed Species Data Map (Exhibit C). Field surveys consisted of meandering pedestrian transects through each habitat present on the project site. These survey methodologies were generally consistent with those prescribed by the FWC (FGFWFC 1988 Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval. FGFWFC. Tallahassee, FL). WilsonMiller ecologists were equipped with a compass, aerials, binoculars, and field notebooks for documentation purposes. While performing meandering pedestrian transects, ecologists periodically stopped, looked for wildlife, signs of wildlife, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Pedestrian transects were conducted in the early morning and late evening. Early morning transects were started one-half hour before sunrise and evening transects lasted until one- half hour after sunset. The listed species survey was performed on August 25, September 23, 24 and 29 and October 1, 2008. WilsonMiller Exhibit D shows the Listed Species Transects and Locations Map for the listed species survey. Table 1 lists pertinent information relating to the vegetation mapping/listed species survey. Table 1 - Listed Vegetation Species Survey Ecologists involved, survey dates and time and weather conditions during survey (temperature given represents temperature at beginning of survey when no range is specified. ECOLOGIST DATE TIME OF DAY WEATHER Justin Styer 8/25/08 7:00 am—10:30 am 75°F-85°F,sunny skies,wind 0—5 mph Justin Styer 9/23/08 7:15 am—3:00 pm 73°F-90°F, partly cloudy,wind 5—10 mph Justin Styer 9/24/08 7:15 am—3:00pm 72°F-90°F, mostly sunny,wind 10-15 mph Craig Schmitt ler 9/29/08 11:00 am—7:10 pm 85°F, partly cloudy,wind 0—5 mph Craig Schmitt ler 10/1/08 11:15 am—7:30 pm 87°F, mostly sunny,wind 0—5 mph The following provides a discussion of how the methodologies employed during the surveys deviated from the specific subcategories of wildlife survey methods recommended in the referenced FWC document. "Upland Surveys" - Methods used were consistent except that in the majority of cases, the density of transects occupied exceeded the recommended density; and surveys addressed more species than those listed in the 1988 FWC publication. "Small Mammal Sampling" - No small mammal trapping was performed. None of the species listed under this methodology could be reasonably expected to occur on the property due to inappropriate range and habitat. "Herpetofaunal_Surveys" - No herpetofaunal trapping was performed. None of the species listed under this methodology could be reasonably expected to occur on the property due to inappropriate habitat. 3.2. Listed Plant Species Documented Onsite During the course of mapping vegetation associations and conducting listed species transects, WilsonMiller ecologists also searched for plants listed by the Florida Department 10113/2008-206828-Ver 2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 c Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report of Agriculture (FDA) and/or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) that may be present on the project site. The above-noted agencies have categorized the various listed plant species based upon their relative abundance in natural communities. Those categorizations include "Endangered;" "Threatened," and "Commercially Exploited". "Endangered" means species of plants native to the State that are in imminent danger of extinction within the State, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue, and includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened, pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, Public Law No. 93-205 (87 Stat. 884). "Threatened" means species native to the State that are in rapid decline in number of plants within the State, but which have not decreased in such number as to cause them to be endangered. "Commercially exploited" means species native to the State which are subject to removal in significant numbers from native habitats in the State and sold or transported for sale. The protection afforded plants listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying plants found on private lands of another, or public lands, without permission and/or a permit from the FDA. There are no restrictions for landowners, unless the sale of plants is involved. These provisions are found in Section 581.185, FDA under State law. Those plants listed by the FDA, which were documented by the listed species survey to exist on the project site, are listed in Table 2. There were four species of listed plants, per the FDA list, were observed on the property: the twisted air plant (Tillandsia flexuosa), the stiff-leaved wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), the wild pine (Tillandsia balbisinia), and the butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis). The twisted air plant is listed by the FDA as Endangered, the stiff-leaved wild pine is listed by the FDA as Endangered, the wild pine is listed as Endangered, and the butterfly orchid is listed as Commercially Exploited by the FDA. None of these plant species are listed by the FWS. The above-mentioned plant species, although listed by the FDA, are relatively common in southwest Florida. Table 2- Listed plant species observed COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS HABITAT FDA FWS Twisted air plant Tillandsia flexuosa E NL 411,416,433 Stiff-leaved wild pine Tillandsia fasciculata E NL 411,416,433 Wild pine Tillandsia balbisinia E NL 428 _ Butterfly orchid Encyclia tampensis C NL 416,433,621 FDA =Florida Department of Agriculture FWS =United States Fish and Wildlife Service E =Endangered T =Threatened NL =Not Listed Habitat =Major FLUCCS categories in which indicated species were observed or are most likely to occur. 3.3. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur On Site But Were Not Observed The following species listed in Table 3 could potentially be found on the project site due to the presence of appropriate habitat, but were not actually observed. Table 3 - Listed plant species that could potentially occur but were not observed COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS HABITAT FDA FWS Giant wild pine Tillandsia utriculata E NL 411,416,433 FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 6 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report E = Endangered C = Commercially exploited NL = Not listed Habitat = Major FLUCCS categories in which indicated species were observed or are most likely to occur. 3.4. Listed Wildlife Species Documented Onsite During the listed species survey, state and federally listed wildlife species were observed on the project site including the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) and American alligator (Alligator mississippensis). The gopher tortoise is listed as Threatened by the FWC and is not listed by the FWS. The Big Cypress fox squirrel is listed as Threatened by the FWC and is listed not listed by the FWS. The American alligator is listed as a Species of Special Concern by the FWC and is not listed by the FWS. A total of seventeen active and inactive gopher tortoise burrows were observed on the site and their approximate locations are presented on the Listed Species Transects and Locations Map (Exhibit D). Several listed wading birds were observed foraging in the stormwater management lakes within the existing golf course during the listed species survey. These species include the little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), snowy egret (Egretta thula), white ibis (Eudocimus albus), and tri-colored heron (Egretta tricolor). These wading birds are listed by the FWC as Species of Special Concern and are not listed by the FWS. 3.5. Listed Wildlife Species That Could Potentially Occur Onsite But Were Not Observed Although not observed during the listed species survey, the following state and/or federally listed wildlife species could utilize or visit the site as a result of potentially suitable habitat being present: Florida panther, Eastern indigo snake, bald eagle, wood stork, and the Florida black bear. Various sources of information were used to determine the possibility of occurrence (FNAI, 1998; FWS 1997, FWC 1997, FDA 1997). Table 4 denotes listed wildlife species that have a potential to occur on the project site, although they were not observed. Common habitat occurrence, state/federal status, and potential for occurrence are also given in Table 4. Florida Panther- The Florida panther is listed as Endangered by the FWS and the FWC. A portion of the western-most property is located within the FWS Panther Secondary Protection Zone, as mapped by the FWS. WilsonMiller Exhibit C shows the Secondary Protection Zone mapped for this region of the county. The FWC telemetry data indicates Florida panther #28 was documented occurring on or near the property on June 21 and June 23, 1989. FWC telemetry data indicates Florida panther (Texas Cougar #101) was documented occurring approximately 1.0 and 1.6 miles north and northwest of the project site in 1995. This female Texas cougar was introduced into the population in the mid-1990's in an effort to restore historic genetics of the Florida panther population. FWC telemetry data indicates Florida panther #66 was documented occurring approximately 1.3 miles to the east of the site in 1998. FWC telemetry data indicates Florida panther #92 was documented occurring approximately 1.3 miles north of the site in 2001. The FWC data indicates that a collared panther has not been documented on the subject property for 19 years and two panthers occurred within 1.3 miles of the site 10 years ago and 7 years ago. No individuals or signs of panther were observed on the site during the listed species survey. Florida Black Bear - The Florida black bear is listed as Threatened by the FWC and is not listed by the FWS. The black bear is a transient animal that is highly opportunistic, and is not an uncommon occurrence in residential neighborhoods in search of food. Current FWC data indicates that the nearest documented Florida black bear location to the project 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 7 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report site were individuals more than two (2) miles south of the site in the Golden Gate Estates. Black bear have also been documented occurring four miles to the east and northeast of the site. Although there is a possibility of a black bear to walk across or visit the project site, no individuals or signs of this species were observed during the listed species survey. Eastern Indigo Snake - The Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) has the potential to occur on the project site. The indigo snake is listed as Threatened by FWS and FWC. No individuals or signs of this species were observed on the site during listed species surveys. Wood Stork - There is a potential for the wood stork (Mycteria americana), to forage on or otherwise utilize the property. The wood stork is listed as Endangered by the FWC and the FWS. The site is located within the 18-mile wood stork foraging core of Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. Bald Eagle - There is a potential for the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) to forage on or otherwise utilize the property. The bald eagle has been taken off the endangered species list but is still protected by the Golden and Bald Eagle Protection Act. The FWC data indicates the presence of an active bald eagle nest within 1 mile of the site. The FWS and FWC protection zones established around active bald eagle nest trees are a 330' and 660' foot radius from the tree. The documented bald eagle tree is located near the southwest property corner of the Calusa Pines Golf Club and is approximately a mile or more for the site. .The bald eagle could spend time foraging for fish within the stormwater management lakes on the property. Table 4- Listed wildlife species that could potentially occur but were not observed SCIENTIFIC COMMON FWC FS Habitat Observed Potential W NAME NAME Status Status (FLUCCS) During For COMMENTS Survey Occurrence Felis concolor Florida panther E E All No Low- Unlikely coryi Moderate transient Ursus Florida black Low- Unlikely americanus bear T NL All No Moderate transient floridanus Haliaeetus Bald eagle NL NL 527,433, No Low Potential visitor leucocephalus 621 Mycteria Wood stork E E 527,621, No Moderate Potential visitor americana 740 Drymarchon Eastern indigo Potential corals coupieri snake T T All No Moderate resident or visitor FWC =Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FWS =United States Fish and Wildlife Service E =Endangered T =Threatened SSC =Species of Special Concern NL =Not Listed Habitat =Major FLUCCS categories in which indicated species were observed or are most likely to occur. 3.6. Non-listed Species Documented Onsite (General Wildlife Observations) Table 5 gives a list of non-listed wildlife species and their FLUCCS occurrence as documented on the site during the listed species survey. Table 5- List of non-listed wildlife species observed COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME FLUCCS Occurrence BIRDS Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis 428,433 Common nighthawk Chordeiles minor 411 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 8 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME FLUCCS Occurrence Blue jay Cyanocitta crisata 416 Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus 411 Red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus 411,416 Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos 411,433,416 Downy woodpecker Picoides pubescens 411,416,433 Mourning dove Zenaida macroura 411,416,433, 740 AMPHIBIANS&REPTILES Brown anole Anolis sagrei 411,416,433,621 Cuban anole Anolis s. sagrei 411,416,433,621 Cuban treefrog Osteopilus septentrionalis 433 MAMMALS Nine-banded armadillo* Dasypus novemcinctus 411,416 White-tailed deer* Odocoileus virginianus 411,428,433, 740 Raccoon* Procyon lotor 411,416,433 Feral hog Sus scrofa 411,416,428,433 Marsh rabbit Sylvilagus palustris 416 *Signs of these species(i.e.—tracks,scat,burrows,rubs,etc.)were observed. 4. SUMMARY 4.1. Listed Plants The protection afforded plants listed by the FDA entails restrictions on harvesting or destroying listed plants found on private lands of another or on public lands without permission and/or a permit from the FDA. There are no restrictions for landowners, unless the sale of plants is involved. No plants listed by the FWS were observed on the site. The following plants, listed by the FDA as Endangered, were observed on the project site: the stiff-leaved wild pine, twisted air plant, wild pine, and butterfly orchid. These species of listed air plants are relatively common in southwest Florida. 4.2. Listed Wildlife The Florida panther has not been documented by the FWC as occurring on the site but the property occurs within the Secondary Protection Zone as mapped by the FWS. The site has not functioned during recent decades as any portion of any known home range of breeding females, adult males or sub-adult males. Furthermore, the site has not been documented contributing to the survival of any collared female, adult or sub-adult dispersing male panthers. The site offers limited landscape linkage to panther dispersal routes. The property is not adjacent to habitats that are currently occupied by panther. The FWS describes the Secondary Zone as natural and potentially restorable disturbed lands adjacent to the Primary Zone that are not known to support panthers on a regular basis. The site does not provide habitat important for transient sub-adult male panthers. The Florida black bear has not been documented occurring on or otherwise utilizing the site however black bear have been documented by the FWC occurring in nearby Golden Gate Estates properties to the south and east. Black bears have been documented by the FWC occurring over 2 miles to the south and over 4 miles to the east of the property. There is a potential for black bear to walk across or otherwise visit the site in the future. Therefore, the FWC and Collier County Environmental Services Department may require the preparation of a Florida black bear management plan. The Big Cypress fox squirrel has been documented utilizing the site and there is potential for the Big Cypress fox squirrel to utilize the property in the future. Therefore, the FWC, South Florida Water Management District and Collier County Environmental Services will likely require the preparation of a Big Cypress fox squirrel management plan. 10/13/2008-206828-Ver.2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 9 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report The Eastern indigo snake has the potential to utilize the property but has not been documented onsite. The FWC, FWS, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Collier County Environmental Services Department may require the preparation of an Eastern indigo snake management plan. The gopher tortoise has been documented occurring on the property. There were a total of seventeen active and inactive burrows observed within native habitats. Using the FWC burrow occupancy conversion factor of 0.614, approximately ten (17 X 0.614 = 10.4) tortoises are estimated to inhabit the site. Collier County will likely request the tortoises to be preserved on the site within retained native vegetation. A gopher tortoise relocation permit will need to be processed through the FWC and Collier County should the tortoises be required to be relocated within the property. A gopher tortoise permit to relocate tortoises' offsite could also be obtained through FWC and Collier County. The wood stork has the potential to forage on or otherwise utilize portions of the property. The Olde Florida Club property is within 18-miles of a documented nesting site (Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary). If wetland impacts are proposed on the site, technical assistance with FWS will be required to address mitigation for impacts to wood stork habitat. The exact amount of mitigation required for impacting potential wood stork habitat is not known and will be determined when the project goes through the federal permitting process. The bald eagle has the potential to occur on the property and an active bald eagle nest is documented by FWC occurring within 1 mile of the site. However, the Olde Florida Club property is located well out of the established 330' and 660' protection zones for bald eagle nest trees. No bald eagle individual or nests were observed on the property during the listed species survey. The listed wading birds documented foraging on the subject property are fairly common to south Florida. No nests of these species were documented occurring on the site. It is anticipated listed wading birds will continue to foraging on or utilize the site. The Florida panther, Eastern indigo snake, wood stork, bald eagle, and the Florida black bear have the potential to utilize the project site. However, none of the above-listed wildlife species, or signs of their presence, were observed occurring on the project site during the listed species survey. This region of the county is rapidly developing and represents fragmented wildlife habitat. This plays a significant role in deterring wildlife species, listed or otherwise, from utilizing the site. With the proper approved state, federal and local agency wildlife management plans in place, no adverse impacts to listed wildlife species are anticipated to occur as a result of the future development of the property. 5. REFERENCES The Audubon Society, Field Guide to North American Mammals, 1989. Behler, John L. and F. Wayne King. 1980. The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Reptiles & Amphibians. Chanticleer Press, Knopf, New York. 8th printing, 1989. Bull, John, and John Farrand, Jr. The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Birds, Eastern Region. 1977. Chanticleer Press, Knopf, New York. 22nd printing, 1993. Dressler, Robert L., David W. Hall, Kent D. Perkins, and Norris H. Williams. Identification Manual for Wetland Plant Species of Florida. Florida Department of Transportation. January 1999 Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Third Edition. 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 10 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2007. Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, Official Lists. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 1988. Wildlife Methodology Guidelines. Humphrey, S.R. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, Volume I Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Moler, P.E. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, Amphibians and Reptiles. Volume Ill. University Press of Florida, Tallahassee, FL. National Geographic Society. Field Guide to the Birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C. Second Edition, 1994. University Presses of Florida. 1991. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume 5 (Plants). Whitaker, Jr., John O. 1980. The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Mammals. Chanticleer Press, Knopf, New York. 8th printing, 1989. Wunderlin, Richard P. Guide to The Vascular Plants of Central Florida. 1982. Board of Regents of the State of Florida. 1986. 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 Olde Florida Golf Club Listed Species Survey Report EXHIBITS 10/13/2008-206828-Ver:2-TKING N0107-015-001-PZON-32525 .. ' —' '. '41.1ri----4fr; —'''..e”rfr--itiqf r s. ..,,,,._,; ; ,5,„_,.....,,,,„ s, • .. ...... 4 _,,,,,,' 4,,,,.„1=14'4,',',IrC4,....... if r=4"! 0,„I •1,. iftt*:.tA '.. 4',i)- �,I, y j 4041 +_, t E g r - f� s. s: ; *: ,a.,�x ti. �Y. {�` ik..... I rS g S * ®.may.-.���r-__ c o f `'� a: .� w:8 le. s:t A — :li Yv.s6€� ,IAA c. - - - _� .,,C :;; — fill �o 4 �l'a :fig,: i ,6; �.....,t,.. ,....:.4,: . rir.*to:1(1:7,1:7",......i � - i- : tiro :, ' f " D ri ir1`. t - ; X 75 ���� rn t N • fi- v_ �- - t,� � ., Al 4,10„ -,='" 1',..' s, . f a lter'-t ° *1 1‘4 »,y k *...• w> j• ,. 1 , el 4m rn y i a xx „1,4., #, � za, ID v_ fivagatt i tf 41, ilkt,..-> r--. ' p ►L. ,. q91, . � � D_ .,'. 1 rn O - CR 951 .` , � ,, =s•; �"'.._�- ea r it lit, a , ....7 , . i 1 ,— . .:24''''''.6 ii ' id-4 tisrt3,,e7,,,t.,..f:01i , tt, i t, µ , - 5 [, t -*/* ., ..,+a k y e' .F ..O . .ter 5V'f '- j /s ~ � by + �. i l ! M \ r -v.. ` s . -. i . Q' . 4_._. :k i --- , ^ A x . wl(Ci 4 IIG �tk --. .' '' �.. • A,/ r V r "C /. lr -F + r •t x hfi. m 7 -. r " .a - ..mo .4 ** x• Y O - 1!,,;; , . . - '';'` < , , .. r. 77 CO F-t yp-e-• I o • — r ; 1 °w s1> > a n K F fi— .,, " ( a F S awr # A y H if,r e a . cz »s� #` } ui f�j i v u i :4 t r t I` . -� N c f 2, ,4,,,,,,i4,1,,,,,,,. i �r .a, , i � -- A i . '* �? 'd 12 s s i`; x . 4.. r o , a �t�f��ili. § 4P S� .....wt. i dri " (; firr .444. < ,! is 4 ` 1 t 1 r S, • # Yc _`< y# P : ' 11 1 1` , y LL •�- AR .ewe IT . „ ,- fl -.4 iiiiii .4$4. 4, '` .tc. rim A 0 �a 2 , GLDES BLV.y. • E A- " gg m v .;1111 ` " 9, � i .,..1-_ 8 .. ,:.... � � '� " "` .,3. -.. �.� Ii ry °�71 O Ihd !! I r�w+.O •V• m 2 _ v -__40.1 �3 $ e6 aw 3 S . m niiir i ii CD m o 3 a . co — ; t i " • .. 4F' '- 77.\-- ..'1' ...:- ■ '� ay Ilitk �t I:' �_ 7 . �,. A ._ - 'wry ��� AIN Ill t. 410 n �� N � _� II 1 111411\ - A• m N N m Z o fillir .,,, i rri fTi. i N NAB j O Ac__ ri r . A VW. 1J W z r W N W m S• r.1 411111IPP n r - ti t lam. .'" S F a N - W a! W Z -''" m m -, T m I 111111111 '. 'C!) ° ' 1 L Rt 4 A m W �,j m 6 ^ ;;* 0 41110IrrolifillIfilifiP 4{ _ , W L-7, . lit ¢/C , � �.7 v m N M . e:I ' I. 1)% os° ....,X Cm) ... i . ""isolati W / N m CO r''' I ' -4'\"'---7-\\ cc + m . - '' :: IP■ , 1 td ' n I •` H A � it + 1 " , iiiVr S, ti ' I i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii11111111 a gogvv000(ggg***2oo(2o mvvv -013-0v-0-0-017vvvv0vvG) i < < 0 w umi m a H °o c c c°o n m m m m o m m m m m m m 3 3 6 ' i i i N a w w i N m ma W N m Ol N m 01 Ol an d ?I T V1?I"1 o{T of t 3 of 0ii?I g x 7.O• o m C1 f��1 p m<<<m<‹m o m m m o - 6 6 O 6 c v v� ' m m n'0 o m m - o a o DLit 3 3 3 mfr ', $$$3 a a a a a a a a a a$a m 11:m W o m 0 a m m m m m m "+ ma a m 3 a . ^ ^ O%� 0x xyxxxx $ u $ $a 333 333 3 3 3 3 333n3 ig N n a s pspN NP P 8 8 8 : 8 8 8 8 8 g 8 8 g 0 0? q R gag ,4-1.4.0.E a a a a a a a a a a a c c C c c P 4 # m mwm fie_ C C C C C C 3 d A ,1 m c $ n. a a... ..o o , m ki m m m m m m z m aaa . . . . . . . . 6666-Z Q0 0 00 o m 880 o o 666.0^ 0'S 1 -... N g 2$ g C C G § ' m IU: HU9 . mmmm F g E w g ff i g Will'la a N > > m aEZ 7 .51 zz zZC c z 4! 1I - NNN Re:Iit;ij. m N N N N 'ir N� m o a Aill Li ;iii": ,,,X mit „pi Vii; . . i qd t+g 3 m m r it ,--4-pgr:., 1.115Mirr‘11115,:ex.,:-;-..vr-.--"..... ' T .. 1 N 3 a o. c m o v o F`.. t tlpiw' 'J'::1M!I! 01°, iI ' : rn & ii - .a. a ,. 'wa �. .�::ii a i ,ter .w,.....ss,. 'P`"-»,' - - "L if - &I c u d H n a ° } E l�i. i ,. fr l a. f ' --;-.. ,... .�8w �$ < Ems ' , _ ., , a..a'�.,.i.,_ .,..,,•Y 3 R y a. � . }i or 'rrI751 ` ' . { 1� I' rn -F ' SUN' S :• . + Z m J D i 't XJ. rr $ p •m ._• . r11 �.. m'''''147:4 ,li--::14!‘::::.-- t ';',...-r:,,,„:„. . ''' 1''''-(7:3'7«.. «: -- my L.,,, 4Y f ,j- f C-- 951 '�I ' a w.-. f 4 4 Ii'•* `� -J/ _ s "+_ � t g /1 "i,' ..�.;} -" ... s i '' �'. ° i•' ,, i__ :. g nq� — e, .;.'-'«:'-''''Tcitc4'.«;:-.. "L;74...ral\ -V W -p L } g 00 �'W � ' �/ C 8 1.6 1: + iv= N F r : ;*::I■i ' �# t • a, '"fit•t. ., � 0'j - 1 813 L . . .. .. .53 C� ^ 0 crn _ t ' ' ^ � � t ^• 1 8 r .., n rit d ��}a. - 1�m $ t � �. .., ,v a (7 � . , % i n; . re . . •r Cr `■ • M- rn ,. di_ fi 7 e h,gy , ,..,,,,,,„,„1 . . s . i Y I.y nii" r k� .e e r. yf u *t L� p �11,12 .B + v t { ae. ., y ,- sr. x § . r y. -.1 , , Tv! , :,. ,:;_.......,..: / /l1 ... , t fix } 't• . k d'' // ^'' ✓ ::,..0 P) ` lr".j* 3'' t > r 1 4:� _ i� ±r F"si"..'F.' '" '1 k "TM V Y r}(} 1` tea° --------„---..•,,,,,i,,,,,- . •„,,t: ,,... .. ,,,..,..., t..,i,,:;• :::,,, ,,,,L,,,.,..„.. ii,.., s: - ' .i } ra. R . n- .? •_; '.. 1.t <- •�: `��� ; •i � 'U}� fir,. a illill � ` 't-"''7' EVERGLADES- BLVD ; x co A p l 1...) ..,�. . I V.11 _ t _ �' .,� .*x _ `"fro 4 �' J atr 0 3. 111/....410, 'k !m a1 - O.00 •Oi ® o 4t o '.3,,,,., ¼:o * 7 CD (c±,3 93ue^ g, P a a m e ) qq a 0 0 - -'' 'I « — x s « J r f , 4 ��t —r I do 1 ,1 r ......„....... .....0, ;., .. . ,,, , it() i . • ...., o ; , . , . N.. . , . . _ . .; • k9 � d Ci M9.1 • i i a ijk-**14" :-'Yee:16�. y °'11 ' 1 f, L ;p _ # t`: ter o'�•� o • O # j I Z 1 I• MCI 0 .,+�rl► , « -' d .% r > O .., - — /� - F I .1 _ t flib O• 0 : w• . te a ti 4 r f. i r . H _ • • ,gyp ; ) U = .-''4,-.."le. ;tie.* . .,/ P , i i XL i 4 – 4e • I 4 . _ 1411 i t 1 s 4 i ,, PA � , , ett Y – t a 4yf. it •y po ti ! w # �;a 1 �° -� - � 3 -. 'pit -: - C C C ER Mq,q 0 yF !o South Florida Water Management District K .„„} Os, - Fort Myers Area Office • 2209 Peck Street • Fort Myers,FL 33901 • (815)552-0599 • FL WATS 1-800-248-1201 DiFP):17177) ,40;24 ‘,N3STJa ¢'S CON 24-06 AUG 1 5 1990 August WILSON,MILLER, ugust 8, 1990 BARTON, SOLL&PEEK,INC. Mr. Arthur Pritzker Wilson, Miller, Barton, & Peek, Inc. 1383 Airport Rd. North Naples, Florida 33942-9986 Dear Arthur: Subject: Wetland Pre-application Inspection Project: Olde Florida Golf Course Location: Collier Co. S31/T48S/R27E Please find enclosed copy of a memorandum to Terri Bates of our West Palm Beach office regarding the above referenced project. As outlined in the memorandum, the field delineated wetlands lines have been approved by staff. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 332-6900. Sincerely, l (1j ç , j- .�3 . �J1 Ja t S. Strutzel t Environmental Analyst Natural Resource Management Division cc: T. Bates Exhibit G-2 mining Board. Jd;des F.Garner,Chairman-Fort Myers Fritz Stein-Belle Glade Valerie Boyd-Naples John R.Wodraska.Executive Director Doran A.Jason.Vice Chairman-Key Biscayne Mike Stout-Windermere James E.Nall-Fort Lauderdale Tilford C.Creel,Deputy Executive Director Arsenio Milian-Miami Ken Adams-West Palm Beach Charles W.Causey-Islamorada Thomas K.MacVicar,Deputy Executive Director District Headquarters, P.O.Box24680 • 3501 Gun Club Road • West Palm Beach,FL 33416-4680 • (407)686-8800 • Florida WATS 1-800-432-2045 CON24-06 MEMORANDUM 4 AUG 151990 TO: Terri Bates WILSON,MILLER, FROM: Janet Strutzel BARYON, SOLL&PEEK, INC. DATE: August 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Olde Florida Club (pre-application meeting/2/13/90) Collier County, S 31/T48S/R27E A pre-application meeting was conducted in order to inspect flagged wetland boundaries. The parcel is located two miles east of SR951 and south of Immokalee Rd. The property consists of cypress wetlands, transitional cypress/pine wetlands and pine flatwood uplands. Some areas of the site have been invaded with the exotic Melalueca. The submitted wetland survey appears to accurately reflect existing wetland boundaries. The attached copy of the wetland survey is provided for your records. cc. A. Pritzker A Map , too large to scan can be viewed in the Boards Minutes and Records Dept. 4`" Floor, Admin. Building F : SFWMD SITE VISIT : Feb . 1990 - Exhibit G-2 Section 31 , Township 48 South, Range 27 East O .F . C . of Naples, Inc . P, R MA,y4 P IF'S .. b South Florida Water Management District a rhos-.. :L�\Y Fort Myers Area Office: 1342 Colonial Blvd.,Suite 81 • Fort Myers,FL 33907 • (813)278-SFWM • I-800-248-1201 • FAX(815)278- JUN — 2 1992 CON 24-06 Regulation Department May 28, 1992 Mr. Clay Carithers Wilson, Miller, Barton, & Peek Wilson Proffessional Center Suite 200, 3200 Bailey Lane at Airport Road Naples, Florida 33942 Dear Mr: Carithers, Please find enclosed copy of the site inspection memorandum for the above mentioned project. A more detailed review of the proposed project site and any proposed mitigation can be provided following the submittal of additional pre-application information or at the time of permitting. The proposed project design will be evaluated for consistency with Appendix 7 of the Basis of Review, found in the District's' "Permit Information Manual, Volume IV". Please note that review of pre-application information is informal and will not be binding on the District until a permit has been issued. A file has been set up at the Fort Myers office with pre- application materials. If you have any further question pertaining to the pre-application information, please contact Janet Strutzel at (813) 278-7396. Si rCly, `?%- ' / Ka/4n Johnso+W Senior Environmental Analyst Natural Resource Management Division C: Lucie Blair, FDER (Fort Myers, office) Skip Bergman, ACOE (Fort Myers, office) bc: Area Engineer, Field Rep. , files, T. Bates Exhibit G-3 Governing Board Allan Milledge,Chairman-Miami James E.Nall-Fort Lauderdale Leah G.Schad-West Palm Beach Tilford C.Creel,Executive Director Valerie Boyd,Vice Chairman-Naples Annie Betancourt-Miami Frank Williamson,Jr.-Okeechobee Thomas K.MacVicar,Deputy Executive Director Ken Adams-West Palm Beach Franklin B.Mann-Fort Myers Eugene K.Pettis-Fort Lauderdale CON 24 M E M O R A N D U M TO: File THROUGH: Karen Johnson, Senior Environmental Analyst FROM: Janet Strutzel taff Environmental Analyst DATE: May 28, 1992 SUBJECT: Olde Florida Golf Club, Collier County, S31/T48S/R27E (Pre-application meeting on May 8, 1992) On May 8, 1992 I met with Clay Carithers and Tom Trettis from Wilson, Miller, Barton, and Peek, at the above referenced site. The site is located in Golden Gate Estates south of Immokalee Road and east of SR 951. The site contains a total of approximately 552 acres, including: remnant pine/cypress transitional wetlands, cypress wetlands and pine flatwoods. Some areas on the site have been invaded with the exotic melaleuca. A jurisdictional determination was conducted on the project site several years ago. The site consisted of cypress wetlands and extensive transitional pine/cypress wetlands of marginal quality. These transitional areas were delineated as wetlands based on the vegetative composition of the project site. Several fires have swept the property over the last four years. The understory vegetation within the transitional areas has changed significantly since the original wetland determination was completed. Grape vine and poison ivy dominate the understory throughout the transitional areas. Data gathered by Wilson Miller within the last two years indicates that the maximum wet season water table in the southern segment of the property is about 2 .5 feet or greater below the soil surface. The northern segment of the property maximum wet season water tables reach the soil surface. Based on monitoring well data and vegetative conditions on the project site staff has agreed with Wilson Miller's request to re- examine the original wetland determination. Original wetland acreage totaled 235 acres. Much of the original wetland acreage consisted of the described transitional areas. The transitional areas of the property have been deleted from the wetland delineation areas. These transitional areas are primarily located at the southern end of the property. Con 24 page 2 Olde Florida Golf Club Several factors have altered the hydrology on the project site. Immokalee Road to the north of the project area has significantly altered historic flows from the north. The Cypress Canal located south of the project site has also altered the hydrology of the wetland located on the project site. The Cypress Canal seems to have primarily affected those wetlands located on the southern half of the project site. Wetlands were delineated by the consultant using aerial photointerpretation from a recently taken scaled and rectified color photograph of the project site. Ground truthing of the project site was conducted in order to verify Fluccs code mapping units of upland and wetland vegetative communities. This site has an existing construction and operation permit. The permittee has been advised that he must abide by conditions set forth in the existing permit until a modified permit is issued. C: Area Engineer, Field Rep. , T. Bates, Mitigation File A Map , too large to scan can be viewed in the Boards Minutes and Records Dept. 4th Floor, Admin . Building F : SFWMD SITE VISIT : Feb . 1990 - Exhibit G-3 Section 31 , Township 48 South, Range 27 East O .F . C . of Naples, Inc . 0 c 0 DER M� t SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT December 15, 2010 • $ Olde Florida Golf Club Inc. 9393 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext Naples, FL 4120 Dear Applicant: Subject: Petition for Formal Determination of Wetlands and Surface Waters Application No. 100629-8 Olde Florida Golf Club Phase 2 Collier County: S31/T48S/R27E Enclosed is a copy of the District's intended agency action regarding your petition for a formal wetland/surface water determination. It is requested that you read this intended agency action thoroughly and understand its contents. The District will publish its notice of intended agency action in a newspaper of general circulation. If no petition requesting an administrative hearing is timely filed with the District Clerk, the Executive Director will then take final agency action on your petition in accordance with the intended agency action. You will receive notification of the final agency action. Should you wish to object to the intended agency action, you must file a petition in conformance with Rule 40E-1.521, Florida Administrative Code(attach): Elizabeth Veguilla, Deputy Clerk South Florida Water Management District Post Office Box 24680 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680 The attached "Notice of Rights" addresses your rights under Florida law should you wish to contest the intended agency action. However, the referenced "Noticed of Rights" should not be used as your sole source of information. To be fully advised of your legal rights, you should seek legal counsel. Please contact the District if you have any questions concerning this process. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a"Notice of Rights"has been mailed to the addressee and the persons listed in the attached distribution list no later than 5:00 p.m. this 15th day of December,2010. Since el •nt ony = Deputy Director E ironmental Resource Regulation Department AW/dr CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1830 0001 0508 3954 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Exhibit G-4 3301 Gun Club Road,West Palm Beach,Florida 33406 • (561)686-8800 • FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 Mailing Address: P.O.Box 24680,West Palm Beach,FL.33416-4680 • www.sfwmd.gov NOTICE OF RIGHTS As required by Sections 120.569(1), and 120.60(3), Fla. Stat., following is notice of the opportunities which may be available for administrative hearing or judicial review when the substantial interests of a party are determined by an agency. Please note that this Notice of Rights is not intended to provide legal advice. Not all the legal proceedings detailed below may be an applicable or appropriate remedy. You may wish to consult an attorney regarding your legal rights. RIGHT TO REQUEST ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING A person whose substantial interests are or may be affected by the South Florida Water Management District's (SFWMD or District) action has the right to request an administrative hearing on that action pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat. Persons seeking a hearing on a District decision which does or may determine their substantial interests shall file a petition for hearing with the District Clerk within 21 days of receipt of written notice of the decision, unless one of the following shorter time periods apply: 1) within 14 days of the notice of consolidated intent to grant or deny concurrently reviewed applications for environmental resource permits and use of sovereign submerged lands pursuant to Section 373.427, Fla. Stat.; or 2) within 14 days of service of an Administrative Order pursuant to Subsection 373.119(1), Fla. Stat. "Receipt of written notice of agency decision" means receipt of either written notice through mail, or electronic mail, or posting that the District has or intends to take final agency action, or publication of notice that the District has or intends to take final agency action. Any person who receives written notice of a SFWMD decision and fails to file a written request for hearing within the timeframe described above waives the right to request a hearing on that decision. Filing Instructions The Petition must be filed with the Office of the District Clerk of the SFWMD. Filings with the District Clerk may be made by mail, hand-delivery or facsimile. Filings by e-mail will not be accepted. Any person wishing to receive a clerked copy with the date and time stamped must provide an additional copy. A petition for administrative hearing is deemed filed upon receipt during normal business hours by the District Clerk at SFWMD headquarters in West Palm Beach, Florida. Any document received by the office of the SFWMD Clerk after 5:00 p.m. shall be filed as of 8:00 a.m. on the next regular business day. Additional filing instructions are as follows: • Filings by mail must be addressed to the Office of the SFWMD Clerk, P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, Florida 33416. • Filings by hand-delivery must be delivered to the Office of the SFWMD Clerk. Delivery of a petition to the SFWMD's security desk does not constitute filing. To ensure proper filing, it will be necessary to request the SFWMD's security officer to contact the Clerk's office. An employee of the SFWMD's Clerk's office will receive and file the petition. • Filings by facsimile must be transmitted to the SFWMD Clerk's Office at(561)682-6010. Pursuant to Subsections 28-106.104(7), (8) and (9), Fla. Admin. Code, a party who files a document by facsimile represents that the original physically signed document will be retained by that party for the duration of that proceeding and of any subsequent appeal or subsequent proceeding in that cause. Any party who elects to file any document by facsimile shall be responsible for any delay, disruption, or interruption of the electronic signals and accepts the full risk that the document may not be properly filed with the clerk as a result. The filing date for a document filed by facsimile shall be the date the SFWMD Clerk receives the complete document. Rev 07/01/2009 1 Initiation of an Administrative Hearing Pursuant to Rules 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, Fla. Admin. Code, initiation of an administrative hearing shall be made by written petition to the SFWMD in legible form and on 8 and 1/2 by 11 inch white paper. All petitions shall contain: 1. Identification of the action being contested, including the permit number, application number, District file number or any other SFWMD identification number, if known. 2. The name, address and telephone number of the petitioner and petitioner's representative, if any. 3. An explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination. 4. A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the SFWMD's decision. 5. A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none,the petition must so indicate. 6. A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the SFWMD's proposed action. 7. A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the SFWMD's proposed action. 8. If disputed issues of material fact exist, the statement must also include an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes. 9. A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action the petitioner wishes the SFWMD to take with respect to the SFWMD's proposed action. A person may file a request for an extension of time for filing a petition. The SFWMD may,for good cause, grant the request. Requests for extension of time must be filed with the SFWMD prior to the deadline for filing a petition for hearing. Such requests for extension shall contain a certificate that the moving party has consulted with all other parties concerning the extension and that the SFWMD and any other parties agree to or oppose the extension.A timely request for extension of time shall toll the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. If the District takes action with substantially different impacts on water resources from the notice of intended agency decision, the persons who may be substantially affected shall have an additional point of entry pursuant to Rule 28-106.111, Fla.Admin. Code, unless otherwise provided by law. Mediation The procedures for pursuing mediation are set forth in Section 120.573, Fla. Stat., and Rules 28-106.111 and 28-106.401-.405, Fla. Admin. Code. The SFWMD is not proposing mediation for this agency action under Section 120.573, Fla. Stat.,at this time. RIGHT TO SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW Pursuant to Sections 120.60(3)and 120.68, Fla. Stat.,a party who is adversely affected by final SFWMD action may seek judicial review of the SFWMD's final decision by filing a notice of appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110 in the Fourth District Court of Appeal or in the appellate district where a party resides and filing a second copy of the notice with the SFWMD Clerk within 30 days of rendering of the final SFWMD action. Rev.07/01/2009 2 erp_staff_report.rdf Last Date For Agency Action: December 21,2010 INDIVIDUAL FORMAL WETLAND DETERMINATION STAFF REPORT Project Name: Olde Florida Golf Club Phase 2 Formal Wetland Determination Permit No.: 11-00024-F Application No.: 100629-8 Application Type:New Formal Wetland Determination Location: Collier County, S31/T48S/R27E Applicant: Olde Florida Golf Club Inc Project Area: 258.41 acres Project Land Use: Wetland Determination Special Drainage District: NA Conservation Easement To District: No Sovereign Submerged Lands: No PROJECT PURPOSE: This application is a request for a formal wetland determination of the boundary of wetlands and other surface waters, pursuant to Rule 40E-4.042 Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), for a 258.41 acre parcel known as Olde Florida Golf Club Phase 2. App.no. 100629-8 Page 1 of 4 eip_staff_report.rdf PROJECT EVALUATION: • PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION: • The site is located north of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, south of Immokalee Road, east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Naples, Collier County. A location map is attached as Exhibit 1.0. Hydrology in this area is affected by the Cocohatchee Canal to the north, Curry Canal to the east and Cypress Canal to the south. The upland habitat onsite consists of palmetto prairie, upland pine flatwoods, live oak with less than 25% invasive species, cabbage palm with varying levels of invasive and nuisance plant species (0-75%), previously cleared disturbed lands, Brazilian pepper monoculture, a small portion of the existing golf course, and non-hydric cypress-pine-cabbage palm habitat. Wetland habitat onsite consists of freshwater marsh with varying levels of invasive species, and cypress-pine-cabbage palm with up to 50%invasive species. The cypress-pine-cabbage palm habitat not claimed as jurisdictional wetlands do not show signs of hydric soils or hydrology. Surface waters consist of a borrow area with approximately 75%invasive species.A FLUCCS habitat map is attached as Exhibit 2.0. PROJECT BACKGROUND: A field inspection of the property was conducted by Karyn Allman of the South Florida Water Management District, Tom Trettis and Craig Schmitt ler of Wilson Miller/Stantec on August 12, 2010. The methodologies utilized to delineate and verify the locations of the wetlands and other surface waters onsite were consistent with Rule 62-340 F.A.C. and subsection 373.421(2) Florida Statutes (F.S.). The wetland lines were delineated using a GPS in accordance with Section 4.5.2 (b)1 of the Basis of Review and Rule 62.340, F.A.C. Due to the hydrologic alterations within the region from the surrounding canals, the use of groundwater well data was utilized to delineate the extent of jurisdictional cypress-pine-cabbage palm habitat. Pursuant to 62-340.500(8) F.A.C., measurements of inundation or saturation which support the presence of water to an extent consistent with the provisions of the definition of wetlands can be utilized as hydrologic indicators in delineating wetlands. A description of the ground water well data and the wetland habitats are provided in the wetland section of this staff report. The 258.41 acres onsite are within ERP permit 11-00898-S. In 1991, Application No. 901105-11 revised the wetland lines within the entire Olde Florida Golf Club based on ground water well data and site visits by District and Army Corps of Engineer staff. The current wetland determination reflects additional changes to the wetland line within Phase 2. The habitats within the 38.71 acres of existing conservation easement in the north east corner of the Olde Florida Phase 2 site were not reviewed under this determination,and were not included in the project acreage. WETLANDS: DOMINANT VEGETATION/WETLAND DESCRIPTION: Based on the August 12, 2010 site visit, there are a total of 30.88 acres of herbaceous and forested wetlands within the project area. The 19.91-acre forested wetland is located in the central portion of the property and contains cypress, slash pine, red bay, cabbage palm, swamp fern, wire grass, and Brazilian pepper. The delineation of the forested wetland is described in the Soils/Hydrologic indicators section. The smallest wetland onsite is a pocket of freshwater marsh (0.04 acres)located in the south east portion of the project within the disturbed land habitat (piles of landscape debris). The wetland is in a small depression and is comprised of largely cattails with some maidencane and other herbaceous vegetation. There are three larger herbaceous wetlands (labeled as Wetland 1, 3, and 5 on Exhibit 3.0), one in the south east and two in the south west. Wetland 1 is 5.14 acres,Wetland 3 is 2.91 acres,and Wetland 5 is App.no.: 100629-8 Page 2 of 4 erp_staff_report.rdf 2.88 acres. It appears that the ground within these three wetland areas was at one time mechanically scraped down, creating the herbaceous habitat. There are portions of the herbaceous wetlands that are shallow,closer to wet prairie habitat with rock outcroppings at the surface. Vegetation in these shallower portions of the wetlands consists of pluchea, coreopsis, eleocharis, and white top sedge. The deeper portions of the wetlands contain willow, primrose willow, torpedo grass, maidencane, fox tail, eleocharis, juncus, cattail, frog fruit, button bush, and dog fennel. The wetlands have been field flagged and surveyed (See Exhibit 3.0). Delineation of the herbaceous wetlands was based on the B-test under Section 62-340.300(2)(b)F.A.C. SOIL TYPES AND HYDROLOGIC INDICATORS: The site is underlain by four(4) soil types: Oldmar fine sand, limestone substratum (10), Hallandale fine sand (11), Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum (18), and Boca fine sand (21). Please see exhibit 4.0 for location of each soil type within the site. The hydric soils within the site showed signs of altered hydrology. Hydric soil indicators within the cypress habitat were below 6". Some organic bodies were present but did not meet the hydric soil criteria. Another sign of hydrologic alteration included extensive grape vine in the ground cover in some areas, outcompeting wire grass and other wetland ground cover species. The wetland boundaries within the cypress habitat were determined based on vegetation and the hydrology criteria outlined in Section 62-340.500(8) F.A.C. Hydrologic data from groundwater wells indicated areas that met the criteria of inundation for 7 consecutive days or saturation within 6"of the soil surface for 20 consecutive days. Data from eighteen (18) groundwater wells located throughout the property were collected over three years (2008-2010). The data indicated that the cypress habitat met the inundation or saturation criteria at ground elevation 12.47 NGVD or below all three years. The habitat found at elevations between 12.47 and 12.6 NGVD met the hydrologic criteria in some years, but not all three years. The wetland line was therefore delineated using elevation 12.47 NGVD. Please see the permanent permit file for a copy of the groundwater well data, rainfall data, and ground elevations. The location of the wells and associated elevations are shown on page 1 of Exhibit 3.0. WETLAND DELINEATION: Pursuant to Subsection 373.421(2), F.S. and Section 4.5 of the Basis of Review,the formal determination of wetlands and other surface waters were surveyed in a mathematically reproducible form as provided on Exhibit 3.0. App.no 100629-8 Page 3 of 4 erp_staff_report.rdf STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: The Staff recommends that the following be issued : A formal determination of the extent of wetlands and other surface waters, pursuant to Rule 40E-4.042 F.A.C. within the boundaries of the approximately 258.41-acre site known as Olde Florida Golf Club Phase 2. As shown on Exhibit 3.0, the project contains 30.88 acres of wetlands, as defined by Rule 62-340, F.A.C. Based on the information provided, District rules have been adhered to. Staff recommendation is for approval subject to the attached Special Conditions. STAFF REVIEW: NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SUPERVI OR 1 Karp' n Lain Layman r ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITTING DIVISION DIRECTOR: l� �'{l� {! ? �'�„ _ DATE: /: ,'•Anita R. Bain SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The formal determination shall be binding for five years provided the physical condition on the property does not change so as to alter the boundary of the wetlands and other surface waters during that period.The permit shall expire five years from the date of permit issuance. App.no.: 100629-8 Page 4 of 4 v......,11'.-.:, ( lii{I�d; 1 1 o G '- I!{ti 1i! . {I�• �{ '�1.f.'. :'r l r. ,CJR18 S3GV1Oa3�t3 i . 1 ��hii'` lliv 1 ii' 1( T , ' ..—, S.: 1 . l r,a •' _ "' o ate, � _ , � ,. .., '.r..„t� ..__,. 11 :. .ter , oil{ i -.1.-.� ..-i , t: ...t., l M .it • 0 J 1,,',' I l .� f h r �( 04 1f,.',, 46' J I.• y. • r 9 {1, : 1 ,wii.1•1;'•...: r SL .•i• 1� y� i rl , { Z , , > '2 i f 111 Q s , I i7 . {il i{ r I� ,y i f 1 l: r Exhibit 1.0 Application No. 100629-8 1 of 1 416 E2 428 E2 621 E2 67(NN(0) 411 E2 624 62 62(6 W0) 624 63 242(141110) 721 426 E2 62 624 E2 N1 64410) 624 63 646.116 426 62 142 416 61412 427 61 612 41661 141 321 641 62 411 El 61 321 624 62 426 El 62 321 411 El NI 426 E2 142 162 422 624 61141(NW0) 476 161 62 641 62 624 El 541166 428 El 331 624 63143(4WD) 742 E4 624 E WO) 476 ES 436 E2 416E3 426 Ex 742 E4 611 El 424E3 641 E2---"P 426 E1 740 E3 63 416 416 62413(66)0) Mauo.mr vNV 26,,.a.n 1 M�.;.w4�w.�..�•i w..nrn n 41 W_C5 IN w -r�. 4Rp /il 62141 vicz. woo..n.R r'y1. R WilsonMiller Pon N.�:r rvr > NO Now uww.r +7 1'- M6 -hR7.rr4hM.RM.R wwMt.ti ,NN .R �_ .T�:1'};y b. 2�r..N)r\M..w 4Nw R+•r+n.� �rVbff ry • Iw.ewa•..x4r.... 1ST m ! r— OI.I)I. OKIU:\ (7O1_I C I t,I; - i'ii \5i 2 FI LC' CS NI I' Exhibit 2.0 Application No. 100629-8 1 of 2 1 t i•t'at `3, :c$Yt.C•I A::.'. � Ii .1 v 1 f 'yftt3.,J�.t.,�,E. ■ ,�' j , ...`t `f \ :t x 1 ` • . j f . r.,.,,.,, j ti, g - t j , '. t r , le . qv\ ) r + i 3 N OfIllt' ./ I. r I (•!Iii, ...I" I,. 4 4,,,,, - - • S Li Y. ... "... ohVOa,r.i.PNw3 , ,- �ry.�..��n�'rlClwte,bri'1N\ = :. .caox5 Y ....ww.r.s....lop rw^ N"�11 . Wilso;(Miller /I ,;s'$ ., €o�: "' ;: .-.Y... , » ` 4:: wr. :::� 0 O1 1)1 1 1 O1( O 11): (; t 1� ( I t Ld `G - I'IIA I I. U C ( 5 11 \ I' - Exhibit 2.0 Application No, 100629-8 2 of 2 - •,,- * ,: ' •,...,..v,i' .." . . , , .. . 1 0 .tir l4,w.,..,...4.,''c.,:.l'.4,ty.rr1 e-c"4,/y.1.,.'l1...!-t..l.—e.,W.,e.„;,:i'f„':--et4.y.-,r,..-;,..e'-;*1•"'t45';-',';t;'.,.4',,;.Yt I;-t.,2.11‘•.'..1...k....,..*/.,'.:t 4i.-.,'-:,r,r.1e.,.'y..4,,p:,".4/).1,,r.,4,..,,'..,•'„..14'.,14,,-,i:-,.-,r,7,"■..',+.t.*..31.`r,.17'-i,i.s.4!*C,.,.„.r.,,/:,-,.,..',.'.'..•.„-,..'.,.,..f.).'0.'.;*''Y.”-•..i,„r,,,...r.'.,..`..,.,.■:,,'-'',,..'T N'..'-r..V''•,.*.-''.-,.r...4..'.''',.."...#i,,-,'frZ'.'•....t._'.;'t.,.'.z .:1..,..Z...''/.,s:.'.:4.!•.','.,..;‘.,44,,..1.?*-.,.,.....:..,i„1.;,f 1.4.;,4-s.f,,4•,1,,4t-.'...;0.-a.',:.?4,-/.-?S.p41'"A;411.1v 1,..4•i.•t;.'.1p''*;',4,',:1.,0,1t,,;A4A-4",fPi..-(.t 1,4.-3,!.'..4 .'/',"':..0o,..."-.'.‘•, ,4,-i.,'",.1'-.'5'(,-,..1.*':;,,'-'.,.',.,"• " 4,'...•-'••.:.--",.--i--,.'-)'3..';1,•‘.'-1 g-'4..7 T';r V','1,;1','v,..0„,,.4..:.'1.-'.,.,0•--„,,,,•-,,,,.w,:1.,.':.!..' . .... .t•-'' ,'','",.--..-„- -..'4,;:.,, .4...*,,,,,it.-,,-1- ..,,,.- trp*,-t%.,-.:,,!-----.:.-,,r....-,v,,,,, • '7 ' '4141.0-4/ 1RX,P3P;-". ',,tr- '-;i".; kkt--'.- -,/-47''''' '..t4E-lifielttk. . 4,0$,P•04, ;A:kk''''', -'. - ' k .p.#;I:0444'113/,,'‘Or. ;t1•''*-tkil,' -',?..",'i•-,,'r'''':,'-7.''' l'i;,, ,..- :4C,,.141.1t: zir11,-,tr• - ' ' .. .,_.,.IA.@ Ai: ''......--- '''),4*''`'*":.'4..tir 0' ', )...:,: - 7.:-7-- '- rs eft,41.W.E,1:1--...1,!..10..•.'.".• 1 ;A1044I'''1N7):4 4:4.47'9-4;.,;,,;0..-....i.k.fr. ':!,-.,-.1,,,,, :-.iz. ..vv- .-f,..1. ,,,.....4.-.,471,...:-5-..,,..,,,,c,t,... . . • . . ',..,iie:',0......f:4;1fklit.,:iiite,:-..'-,?:74.,,,.. 4:1'.,!!),--L7'..PK -2,,,,,41.6,te-1-'- ,:‘4.',,, ,fa.'-'0:4;.-,,* . • : . ,. 7 -4 54.,,A,..m.;;;--;;.--.......7-!:!-T. klit;.. .:'*".:AP, -; 1.4,*''. 'cim,;12.),,;„.1.givig'i ..- '-;i1.7.:2,: i.:,;—;.,•••;...;.-',1',„,.,,,k.it.,,,,,t..4';',:., 1, 1 •.:4-.. .‘..,AV "1:,------ .:',. „.:-.-.•,,2,.' 1.4.. , .,., ...7....4. w.,,.t.„,,,,. , ‘„.- , A.,will.f.„,,,,..., , ......„:,,,, . . ., . '''' 4;7.,....r,10ke,'4,1"..t.,i;t,,Vei- ' 4..7.:). ''.w`-- ,...":1e.„:1°. „„"t.','': . uc ,. ' '1,4,..,/,,,,,''...• .'' ,i 14€4:7 iik".../ :±7 .t'A,;:.2, „,.:it A.",,,e,q,!... . ..,,,,'„..e.,,Ti. , -e!,•.„4.37.›,,v,,': :2,,,,,A'`,'.., ' , ' '-lo !ir,,1,-,''' '; `5:,,,:-,,,:e - ,.4",., -2:".,...«:- .r.'.!:..-•'..--c,,-/•'-- *".4452)," 2.$4,':,....y,:`,,' ...., ,' 0P.r *1:P.,. •.''',".- 4:4?-7P1' -.! ' 4#,..4b4:-.,,z , ,'.7.4.7Lt .'4" .-!:,''' '. :* -,.0...g4; i,7,,trn.". - \:::rf.i.-,r-• 4 ;4 .r': * 4 gli•.+..;44.4.'; '‘, ...6r. ifit-..-'';'-',"'-*4.71A.M .,,;`,'.*c;',::- S.c.'t.ii i‘....-,. ''''''' '.4:' F- -4. 115:* '4.,4,..1.-/I''',14iX.1347,' 2';7-.,'.; .':-' .''.1-)-,4."7-'. *...;.'71'-...',...,..V.444kf';', '-7 .■ki.;';A; 4 ., 11.:.:• , 1.0 .4.tiii:.,ib,:i':. **71'-'','..44,`,:' tr.,''''''''-'14ifi*: ' 414'.'...141;.14t,c;-t;'•s-.;;,-T' ,', ,,,•:-:.',- ' ' .- t ,4'. • •.,.. -r:, ., '4,,...Te'7,,,... '.,- ."!',./-Tr:,., 1..,'": •ift 14• itet: '0,ktirl ri,-4,144ge,,,,,,. ‘. - , ivr..,..... ,,,,,..,s-, .,.,. 4.4(fc.:1,:14,/ -, •-"----slitt,t14z.li?' :A' ,.*: ' *ii.V.-leg t. , 1`.44',..,t, ..',:k 1 4;,-rk--:.'4" .4t....„0.t-:. -T4, "i„ti'lf4,,iitLii,f;„4-43'6,ss..-- :.‘,-;,;`,4`.7,4 I 4 , . .4,,,:./..:.•,,,,....in. c-,"-,„,,t,,,, 1:„.,-5:., ...,.-.74-..,4*.z„...:A - '...-......),x,rsIi... -, ,.....:..*-.-.,.-‘ , &iti.:f61;;t -).1-1,,, , „-..---.-e./,...*:.;71,it,-,,,, •-4.,,..:A-', 'ile..,R .- , J--'4,.. /-40, ,r,,,.•,.., k 4:-.„5.,,I, __..,-. ., 7_,.:,:, I r ..ivitzei ..•;,,,4,....:4v.,,, , -_ '(4 t*. lic.71'.'1'•'-'144.-. ...e.,.:'---., rt1.1.47-p'1‘,., .,..?,•1 e..1-•' ' At,. 0,- .1.....,!#.:‘,,•--40,z ' •,... ...sts„-i-„--: $4.?,- 4 •fe'r!,1; ;4.7'.j`'', ,' `';',..'S.. , -...'' .il?.' .I.,''•,4 -, "..i.m.)1?.'" '',,-'','- :'y , :=, ..-4-4,-., :.; , 4.?.,-.,..: ,x,44,y,,,.. .#.0,,,, - ;.'4:, „ '4,„;,!,:?,.t.',',11 t.,••:-.4i-1.;2,-•,7'.....± kkkk'0"-''.14-t.' ''? ,449.", 'k '.;'''..-,....+Akko;-ii.4 • '' - .3.1'17:- '7; *fr:i10.', ','..'; ,... .„, ,./ : It'''..*C.-...., •., '.,:LW. .,44,"*, ;4'., "'4,..,i- . ./' V 4.,.I ZM: X 4 14',1,-';I'.f t.* ,,,, 4•,', '`,, r' '''Mi 0 A t:rli,K.?.\ ,n'' '',`04 '31t 'i '7e ..t X.'.;7:.,•'' .k.4.W',..4, ''4,-'(,,;',4't :,f',7,:t,1■‘;',":,,':■'!t..;,"' ,.. ,..:'., V.. .t..., -,,,I.. , ,,,,„,4.1: .. -4,,, ,i.,. -4T4' ' :-::--r:" .-..,k,' '''''Y .:,, i‘t*:`4.?1,._ -`"`..:',..-.' -''' ... - .?''' r , rte;, ' 64 ''''Pettilk; 4/i o..':'' ',A i'k''' ,343.1 l'*3-YrY. - ' ',k -k-5, 3 • .....741?tim,,v,,°-.."I'fkA',44,torlt t'v io: ..,441),,*, 54‘ ''' -'1".,•..'' ; ' ' ci...51, ,,t.A.441:14ii,4 .-'', ,4,.. .,,,, ,,,...).. ', .--- .,%, ' ..,...-F,., ,•,t?i4 ,4't,.„, 14' :iy- --- ',"' '0,1'1' .: ',.7-,T.,'-:•:? ', '.1 41 lals s.•,;''., --,'-. %.'il:/.. .„). . . ..., .-14`,.....7. -.. d.. -- - -' - '--- .'. ,'1 yore w.,,•0.= - s-.1,-..-, ',.. ..."::tore.,- ' -,'- I mtksiP,' '11+, 4-4.''-'1..*,t .15 . '.,.-i.,....,,, .f. .,*.... .,..,..1- ,,,,t-,: 4r,t,-.;:rj -:,:., :,p" .....,,,4..;• ,,-..._...... ‘ ...:',. _ • .,i'...- ,.,-..0., -*; % • it;:f 4.-.,,4*-147,..r4 •,-, 4 .4.;;.10011titel.:4"ic.41f , .A. '''4.1rt 4 i ;.-- is''. *te.:: .aret., N' • ..,, ., :, -1" , -' '' ••,'' ',V,i. •ki, ' -1..r. ',-,1^14.4""t tt 1.4,4 V.' 's AtiP "..,',47 • '', 1 .''',..'' l', 4V-r ' :,'•`*,P-r- ,. ',/,-.,-# 0.,,,-' 247,11'eref'----1-, .04, *::‘..,,.:f*: ,,:;,.';'.p.,,. 0'1'4--..„ ' • ..,,- -01,,"' '.- •-'`,-::•.' '0171,0 '.'".'1.4.1.117f.*;—;,,,.-,3*!4:).•,,•,-,...."4.e--;:.-...,-: . 4 -— '' ,. :k,‘,,..ogi; - * ' •*,':fuit ' - 1.,„' j.V4.,,:',-, ,0,. ,' tiff.:34...,vA. .„.,...,,,t' ;•j, ' ' 147 • ;Ili!' ..t.4.1i.,4-,.•,--ri,, -..."... ,.,.: 7,- ',...,--,,, • , 40,4,4-., -IA- . , ' ";,'"Vr/.*•-)1.44.**-.';'''•''',/:;4.)....;.'.-;4,,:;.:10.0.,,tt,t..:, ' " .1'. '••, .,, j,,,,..,...,.., '''' 4 ';':•:: r.''''' ' ' +4.' ., ;41 ''..;;;',",,,,,,, ... '...^,•1.-..'4 r.' :.:41/Y1„iti,, iffr ....,:k.4,41,'- ,.. - , t* ;.- '''y - i-fii40.r*;.%. , '-' 'T,..::41' ' 14.1...?""; A ts,,,,,, t- •''''.. 7" '• It ;:' :)!,..;',:, -,...,flAi.7;t:.:,.-f'f',;;.i'4',-15::;',:. ' •„\t" .; ;.„../.' : ' *;.54, .;„,-.,.,• — 7 '•, 1 , .•• • ,N ' .. ' • '1 ktiiit ,•:,, ..), , d." '"',-....', _ 4" , ,,„,441..,•:"., 'Neil A.C.N1,..!\.. t s •:.1.1...„...-s-tr— i ,, „,„,„1.0.,..., EM 8"4'D wm.i.mu ACM) WY , . xj...pt.2 eound i C3 4 ,, 1. ' \ ' . i • . , V * i WIISOn. Mi.11....er I. . ‘ i.........."' .....$3, .... .VII ,,,....4., ,...........- „.■■••■ „ „„....1. .., , _ — s ''. • ... • • I - _ .., ■• . intil,‘ t.t)I I ■ 1 i 1. -• EdA:caben"'0 No,10062D-8 I W ; ' CD Pig ig R o� g 8 o �_ 8 " o 111 I o 'o A08-„t �IVJS o AL t4t.. `FC u �i z �a ; ;fir Igi ff ” x, 3 c P808 g� . tg qi. R°12. a Ill Q i 3 g & CQ o °eg °z t ! ' C -E a /� s go S28;S� $ I •,.: Wg ,y I E� y :li g a o i m g Mg._ s» r .21 s 1 X81 le� so ;s-: o *:oage II!'�^ Jg < iv l W 5 02'15'57"E 2882.53 '�¢1 - ) i WEST UNE SECTION N. N gg 7341.27 EMT ENE SECNON 11 .-1 m W yo3.;7 Y v O� p NS F eu°'w ry ,W ;I _— m G W Vi R tri KB $ a 5 0721'56"E 2677.28 E m+ u T3j m° g 1g- SW l ' a4 2 mR o m 6 m 'A pd ' ` J( N O O 0. ;2;4; \..7 ii F a/a /�"— ° i a 4 mF F.a < � 6,::, <� —U w IA ts z It 6 p m :...fi •s. ` ill'' 1 A l t a ',t 1 ., ! Y co • KEST UNE SECTION 1f u n o EMT 111E SCC1l0N 3. µ0745'58"W .-I _ V o 64 O N 02'40,6"77/674¶7 2658.70 C')� CV 03 2674.77 .n Z Se ti 7 of szw 1 ... /32,m g d spa a : Exhibit 3.0 Application No. 100629-8 2 of 6 •m NNrl! 3 !N n 00)(pp?0001n001•- N NMO . W 1i' T 008N 18nn 81ur N 8 - 0np Km N 6Ml W NN 0 0 0 0 0 0 N NN PtNP PtO N'3om n .O t 31VOS�1 —� N N N N N N N N N .it..,...P P a a P P a P a a P a J m 6 0. Q _ _ N .. g ~ _oaicm�io00((0pOriao1W61NCroNlnoaoa�ial:�N ,l'[,16 I— I=-PMIN7MM7HNNnpp^OM1.Y/1M1N.)MMMM1M 0 LL g1l w z 05 b b t0 b 2 O 10 10 2 10 F O tC b 0)ID O b to b'10 F o+ww W W W W mmamrnrnmmmarnmmm ..r#1:g Io w to 10 to m 10 m to 10 10 10 m e 10 a 10 10 m m m a. F_Zaa'o n a*Y 0 NNNNNp QN p(oNN N0t011fnal.oP0 HW O L, ^..� 2 0.N N N h N N°°l 10f1 tl0)§8 N N N N 800)8 N(0 N 0 a g in O q - _ SO .. y2}Eli;-,,71 q qk I o p c�`� o y + (S-1 \.. 8 O 11 ag e V, 01 V! 10 N N O n N O N n b N O h O h t0 N t- -.- `1•�'U zQ✓8 OOM N/1tV 8 P'6MfV O V nMtClV W N z Z NM1Nn O.-<n 0 0 0 00 01 10 P MONNM^M 0 w W ''"" (0(D onnn1010 010101 (00) 0)0) U q z u W _J 6vaeavvaaaaaaaaaaaaaava � �2,i 4 CO I��••--11 dl 2 �- �i s 11Q - 5-.0 2g`p g o g rU' 011,000POONOIOIN0l0)0101^N-NNOO O 0 Q a •;� Z NNN P n P 4)N1oNNMN000 N.p a(0O 100^ O O G F-00iO O NN O P ONOO N Ot M 0,00 O co N 53 �b jD:K I•"' wannn nnnnnnno°°“"''Np�^p' eem WO ?$ z 00.01 a 07 W 0101 m m CO 0)0101 O1 Of 8AOI OI m 0101 p Sy, w OZ 0 t0 ID�0 10 10 0 t0 10 t0 0)10 t0 to N 10 CO to 0)u 10 to ,I < •2 - 'ten m 3 M 2 1 .$w� 1-N M O N to N 0001 O 'N M P 0)O n a0 OI O N M 8 N" 11-- .. ;g-eAe Z N N N N N N N N M M M 2 2 2 M 0 O P* O W a S S I B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p".?0 9..**0 0 0) ,2g u g O N N 0 0)01 N 0)N 0)0)0)N 01 1(')N N 01 O N N r J m WF'02 C N1:4•$n 0 Q0Q yG �o,rn �j 2 [� qHj.. W • OlJ,1 , o ' — ygix O W•"b N N M P O)N 10 M 10 Y O1 M M M N�-N O N • 1:. zm-Est.4 O N 01 n a d'n N M 01'0tD0tG N 0.1.0] W0 5 wo C, W MMhM 8M0cV NNhMMMMna a a v c aul acrd = ,JO 1� J Waaaaaaaaaaa<a<aaaaaa<a Wz¢ w �O.vO EEL.' qw I— O-10n Nrn 1D OIM W nN 0J 17 to O•-Nn {�Nn KW\ w Ea .1)W OI O N n 01 .i!j b N N O 010^to N 10 0-01 0.'-i2 2 ' p 010 MO O.-O Ma00)ON1000•-MO pN 0l _ 10 100 1p 10 100 b 1M0 tPp 1Pp Po 100 b t'np b tOO INO N 10 100 too.0n d 2 Z Z Omi0tO1n1w01 010100ww.ww10100010010 0('� E3 LL 1.'O' N M P N b N(0S O_N M P 01 b N t0 0)O.- i k8818888888888,98818888828 880088888 p04 3 ui to M ---:.•,,,,,,71,w n N oN 21 0 2, W p h D \ 0. 4 o Di tat O-O n N O a M i 0 R N 0 V ON N- try N 1 h 10 28 N N O 0. .° q + h y i n 0 O P N a 6 2 i10j Y O) 2 .7.c 1 . + O O O 0 .. A „ q ST g C7� e WEST LINE SECTION 31,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EA $ 8 a N 02'45'58'W 2656-70 M 0 EAST LINE SECTION 35,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST I Y N C p O Y O P al 4 t-.'., W 0 5,O Exhibit 3.0 Application No. 100629-8 3 of 6 m os - yy s ( N N O n b h m*O M Y?M n O4iN N Y T 0 o d 0•-M N 24,Mn O n P 0 of Pr pi o;NON NN•l1 of N 0-d • h 7 i Mr s b M,,, M 0 P N 0* O d OONOb N -22 h ON W w p . h'hhh m MM vMrbM N'1M,,,Nh* Y CI O OPf Y Y V<f<y fr Z Ort a°ca Y«Mf xb M , q&r.1,,,_.,_O -b-dN•-nbM YN p0 O m 14 ul b•-•q N O Y M 0,M;0.0 p d on O mdill NMCn O U 0 _ ,_1 Kbb�gge -wNE gt,7WM 8--N O nN n nn N n nn N d Y ") y O b0. o 0 0 000 ebb N v Z 5 b 0sW q r n ^ ° j g5n e U sR ;Q_ l-NMYNbn rn 80 000'000000^NMP Nbnr° • i Onyg,r,0 pOlpO 090000 N O 4 OIN N N N N 000 N N N O O O O O O N N O a Z44 N - n..5�S = PAA i J W ,pUO 1. CO Q N i'a V 0 0 b M N 0 0^M d 0 d M M Y 10 M P 00 M Y b 0 O N b N n N M d 0 M P W M 0 J \• ,n d 1'f NNb YN Nn N Ol OE AN 0 • g n m W O NMMn N oW NN 2bn10O o0r0 M M M N M N N N N o b 1p p m ON n m ap p OYnj q O l.. in Et1 ,44.44.14:14■2777". q.q7.7.7-7;Y d Y Y d d d d p d d Y Y d Y Y Y d Y Y o Y J W UZ w N ryW a O Z N t Sw a• Q 1r1L 0O nNOOlN0 NNM ,0 -N 0N -avN.A W 6 -n 06 n 0010 d m d e- O d < .10• o i0rN MNNNMN^YMO0N04m N b n Y O P -IUD r0, a <•— ¢N N b b b N N d N O b.g M 0 0 Q. n VZ Omo rn a o W an:3;mnmN.rd,n n n n n n. N.<0 O O U 0 $ ii Z Z b b b b b WO W,D b b b b b b m b m2X0gM2 b rnm J !'f� la. 'W�J g <.. LL 1-1nbnQf W O^NMPN bnap OIO YNbn22°^ O pQ4 •_ • r 282,922 nnnnn n nn00o00 0W 000 mn0l _� D 0 0 0 0 o p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r 0 *Ili A NNONNNNNN NNNNONaONNN NN NNN NNN K4 �Zi 1#1 z Fo igwg n CO OZ; •6, g1' j d J v I c. v la_ Q CQZ J W QU' 2Mq 02W r < v 0N d o Q N n 6 W O 3 • ,,Y. a Q d' / pp2 N YM• N mmap V-1 w -=CO h N i p. FW Q yc a Q�.� N N 'n.!� o O M Z G� • 1i ^E N VI of O aJ • N Z ci gy O ow O O O N O O d O po k , O O N N �C $. o -_�� O h n0 N m N n�9� O N �nON pn N IN Y r b YI N N 0 6 h '.. Y1 N W t 1 9 c y O N N h 2 � (� a s a 0 ppb2§.-n*-- N < YS a N�[l� N 00 $ oo f _ 0 ♦ z a°N E 3 s x U 2 m M1 . • > W yOy m . iU W < C �U'4 Q Exhibit 3.0 Application No. 100629-8 4 of 6 • C8 - 0 Co egiT {"0) ,6•-;0D•6N rM.0 MON Qy E MW nMNN Yt0) Mp tj fJ1 CCC ill 1 M Nb00 Ol O N o O�¢n}� ill W Z..'N N N N ry tMY QC( I 31v05 7 a W dw`� J a v a a a° a v a v v a°a w a �Z— N w §; ' ' CD~ aNO<»aaovo'oa06oio�'�vnia�ono' tn 1/U10 x<�ononai�o ~ rrommnmmrmma°p m`aon nnao 0 Z �coeb°ioeeeecococowmfoe 0 wW p. 0 d o9 u°3 4_S C.. r-mo� MVV�'onoo e,o-NM {� a .§8,,r, 8 YQ�g ? NNNNNNNNNNMMMM [{] e-tC Q0,.N NNNUI NNNN NN V]N� Q��j 'Z' j.:t'E"w.. wg z ,4J,.y�- g oow U 2 2 U O O aa H .--.-- O N,z OA Q1 FZ 0"' 11 3 e 4- -fig N O< n N -?''12 2 al i ry L2— J . 3 m •�i Qt " il Po b EVII °ate kg:1=e m JO °o4gn in 0a • n W< t{f�¢¢ N WQ2OI pO�"NA 7� v' 0w .KZ •:',. t Z 0w1='>)Q 00 r,4,- a o ti 1 t^r'�. 2 f 1 L ^ W n O M N H W gR W Y „ � IW � M g a = ° e--1 n cf. N . N (QQ» 4 W `4 o K :4 m n n n nw ° • u o n ii cr > 0 o e r. 00 4 $_ n+ 2r.' O N w A Cn O W Z� 3 CW�b j -Z W 3; 71 ;1,•"'00r z 4- 122W 0 0.-4 C M ) WEST LINE SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANCE 27 EAST u (0) ; co 11 S 02'40'16"E 2674.17 EAST LINE SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST o NM X N W mo uu 0 Exhibit 3.0 Application No. 100629-8 5 of 6 rn to Pie 1-i CNI • .0911— i Iii-T. d 01sM�O0M W N O)ON Ot hn a m�pN O M(�.-Nr7 f p N f N 1p�a O OI,Ni M of!1p�7 1C h<t0 h Oi rl ft;Ol f� b N O g Q. ° V��I w 9nf na<O Mff Mh Il A,•-)nn Ma oo PCY aO 6a 1x¢xRR0 co W J q Q W LL V o in CO V-to o co 0)n MM O,co co mco N^vs CO tV a VJN N o f U O Z W >€ IN O rI <N )00N 00�O O 1010 r)Yl 0)P.-Q 0 N O)O7 A .r N W 8vi y H. S ONM NNM 0,06 no 8° ¢l. 000 f NNNN.0OO iO f O O ^YO 1—. F- �000�00 NNNNNio�o 1�W tO OrO g Nip R-.2 Z Z W IC mmm(0S 00'10 OOi T,T>�m t(0(0.11 O In QOi 081 o210g10i N .Oi Z.t010 CO 010 CO N0 CO�0 CO t0 AO b 0b tO AO CO 10 10010 X00 O Z O 2 z z g eLLp N O WN s--Z f 0 t N co mO-(V o f Nbn 07 OI O -NM/a N 017,CO Cr, §a h M M rry n a f f f a a a f a a N N N N N N N N N N U P-4 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 9 p O w .\:J s W s' a = W W m 3N w J 0 Z F < .. 03 L5 z J (W') NUO x 'n3 0 ci < Dw� 95 NLL -4m cc-aco g,..''o ��� � o V �> WWpQ>, . t.�7 Z 4FDirm Q W Zv v Jva.. P, a --3t-----0 N w. a s ;8"= E 1., .�i� v�'r� , N N N'o O O *•� • N MI 11 w W 4 W g i 1 �" S.rvf �srn eF ✓ w 6 288 A + gad 22`0 ,7; iO U 4 N VIII n N N N N N N ,7, ‘7,N N N 2 L!JI ^ O O _ 2 d N 7 W X 31 n W_ f - k. �<yy O 1FW�-Y p m . V <Vy Exhibit 3.0 fir' Application No. 100629-8 6 of 6 /0406Z9- 8 �l Omits of Wetland Determination i ti'' 1 .4 l t • y r , . . . ..... . ,t .. .... + . 1 t ■lerG►S ; ,Soil# Descri.tlon 10 Oldsmar fine sand limestone substratum '����� j 11 Hallandale fine sand ._.�.o..... 18 Riviera fine sand,limestone substratum 21 Boca Mauna ...4......... "'°"" I _ NRCS SOILS MAI) ., _...--_ 01 1)1:I I.01(11)A( ()I.I CI Ulf- I'11.1,SI II °"'—"` ..,-'"° Exhibit 4.0 Application No. 100629-8 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST • OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB PHASE 2 Application No: 100629-8 Permit No: 11-00024-F INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION _:. EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION X Karyn Allman-4270 X Laura Layman-4270 X Permittee-Olde Florida Golf Club Inc X Permit File X Permittee-Olde Florida Golf Club Inc GOVERNMENT AGENCIES X Collier County Property Appraiser X FDEP, Eric Hickman Environmental Administrator • STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST ADDRESSES Olde Florida Golf Club Inc Olde Florida Golf Club Inc 9393 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext 9393 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext Naples FL 34120 Naples FL 34120 Collier County Property Appraiser FDEP, Eric Hickman Environmental Administrator 2600 Blair Stone Road Ms2500 Tallahassee FL 34952 Application No: 100629-8 Page 2 of 2 P . ii . 7 1 C ' Limits of Wetland Determination I { (: 9: L dy irilic t 4 v r Aai t 'Y t ..:,,.# F , ,,,.. :....:N'! w ': < "'"'' _ ,.„,_,.�„, 'SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT b{ry�3�1�{'IINBIGI elf._ -, "�''+;�FORMAL APPRGXIMATE WETLAND JURISDICTIONAL -_ ,'. ".DETERMINATION �� ��.�� � ,� ...-----�-- -- FIELD VERIFIED BY KARYN ALLMAN wino rm i ' yt t *t _..e ">.: DATE _. i ` SFWMD APPLICATION tf 100629-8 CII Mil) \ (,O11 I 1-I Ii PHAS62 RP=ir1T.n,!'ll REI, 4L2i VC I ,„r.F .9 i r =m 1 § 1 F. ?' n°gccrq 3 _A � , BYE, A i`i - _ , lit_ i : � V ir , . . �3 4 R I ."1? z , ■ rJr ' w r 1 ,y„. ,,, 7 l r VW.*. 'C rs.ot ° " 7 is 7 1 :I, y Oi 1, ;:s- .* .. ,t s 1 r -r e t. , ,, \ - !. � . ', ' i 7 €t `-• 4 ee e 1 f ♦g • — n' r ,. �+ r \ . •,. r"-- \ J / l y l a r— - H1flI g ii{;{§ u .Y. i Ni ilk-, • DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY GULF COAST AREA OFFICE. JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS / - M. Ion Imp P. O. BOX 19247 TAMPA. FLORIDA 33686-9247 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF May 14, 1990 Regulatory Section 4.‘IP RigglaVT 90JD(4)0101 JURISDICTIONAL MAY 16 1990 Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. WILSON, MILLER, c/o Mr. Arthur Pritzker BARTON, SOLL&PEEK, INC. 1383 Airport Road North Naples, Florida 33942-9986 Dear Mr. Pritzker: Reference is made to your correspondence received on April 25, 1990, concerning a jurisdictional determination for the "Olde Florida Golf Club Project" located near Golden Gate Estates in Section 31 , Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Your request was made on behalf of 0.F.C. of Naples, Incorporated. An onsite field meeting on March 15, 1990, was attended by Mr. Skip Bergmann of my staff. The lines shown on the aerial maps, which were submitted with your correspondence, have been verified by Mr. Bergmann and represent the approximate upland/wetland boundary for purposes of determining the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdictional line. The jurisdictional delineation shown on the enclosed aerials can be considered current and correct for a period of two (2) years from the date of this letter. Any reliance upon jurisdictional correspondence beyond that time frame may lead to incorrect planning and design efforts as well as possible violations of current Federal Laws and/or Regulations. The jurisdictional areas are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The discharge of dredgedlOr fill material into these areas will require Department of the Army authorization. Other Federal, State or local permits may be required. Thank you for your cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the Corps of Engineers regulations, please contact Mr. Bergmann at the Fort Myers Regulatory Office, telephone number 813-332-7808. Sincerely, ill? Enclosure(s) it JOSEPH R. BACHELER Of I Chief, Tampa Regulatory Section • Copies Furnished: O.F.C. of Naples, Inc. w/o encl. Collier County Planning Review Services w/encl Exhibit G-5 A Map, too large to scan can be viewed in the Boards Minutes and Records Dept. 4`h Floor, Admin . Building F : SFWMD SITE VISIT : Feb . 1990 - Exhibit G-5 Section 31 , Township 48 South, Range 27 East O .F . C . of Naples , Inc . C G C X,1 .I E �1 llt q S E ti �/°F o DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY {[ fit ° II a4e1 /A i MIAMI FIELD OFFICE,8410 NW 53RD TERRACE MONTEREY BLDG.,SUITE 225 w , -<_i.*f'_.= m MIAMI,FLORIDA 33166 4565 i 1993 c3 pi � rts u5 To REPLY TO ATTENTION OF BARTON & PEEK, INC. Miami Regulatory December 15, 1993 Field Office 199331697 (JDF-SB) JURISDICTIONAL Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek,n Inc. c/o Ms. Dorothy Zysko 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 33942 Dear Ms. Zysko: Reference is made to your correspondence dated December 7, 1993, requesting a jurisdictional determination on the "Olde Florida Golf Club - Phase II" project located in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Onsite field meetings on September 8, 1993 and September 17, 1993 were attended by Mr. Skip Bergmann of my staff. Your request was submitted on behalf of OFC of Naples, Inc. The delineation shown on the aerial photographs which were submitted with your correspondence, has been verified by Mr. Bergmann and represents the approximate upland/wetland boundary for purposes of determining the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdictional line. Please be advised that the jurisdictional delineation shown reflects current policy and regulations and is valid for a period no longer than 3 years from the date of this letter. If after the 3-year period, this jurisdictional determination has not been specifically revalidated by the Corps of Engineers, it shall automatically expire. Any reliance upon jurisdictional correspondence beyond that time frame may lead to incorrect planning and design efforts, as well as possible violations of current Federal laws and/or regulations. You may revalidate or update the jurisdictional guidance as appropriate for your project duration. Any revalidation or updating will then reflect current Federal laws and regulations. The jurisdictional areas are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Any activities undertaken in these areas may require Department of the Army authorization. State, local or other Federal permits may also be required. Thank you for your cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the Corps of Engineers regulations, DleaRe contact Mr. Rer?n nn at the F''rt Myorc Regulatory Field Office, telephone number (813) 694-3438. Sincerely,5 . . ic-eQ, Chap es A. Sch/el Chief, Regulate• y Sect •n Miami Field 0 fice Enclosure Copy Furnished: USFWS (Napt.es) w/encl SFWMD w/encl Lee County w/encl OFC of Naples, Inc. wo/encl CESAJ-RD-S w/encl CESAJ-RD-SM-F w/encl Exhibit G-6 A Map, too large to scan can be viewed in the Boards Minutes & Records Department, 4th Floor of the Admin. Building F: APPROVED SGWMD PROPOSED MODIFICATION to ACOE Jurisdictional Wetlands Phase II Only July 1993 — Exhibit 3 OLDS FLORIDA GOLF CLUB Wilson Miller Barton & Peek, Inc. (.00i4. of DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY % y , JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS • �o M7 1520 ROYAL PALM SQUARE BOULEVARD;SUITE 310 a Smi )Itv FORTrMYERS,FLORIDA 33919 Ikk - ..oy?Ef4``R' Jul 6, 2011 rarrs of P�' REPLY TO July r ATTENTION OF Fort Myers Regulatory Office SAJ-1993-31697 (JD-hwb) ., JURISDICTIONAL VERIFICATION ‘ ' ,° ` ,o, Mr. Bill Barton Olde Florida Golf Club Inc . 605 Palm Circle East Naples, Florida 34102 Dear Mr. Barton: Reference is made to information submitted to the U. S . Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regarding the potential extent of Federal jurisdiction at Olde Florida Golf Club in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, near Naples in Collier County, Florida. The evaluation of this jurisdictional determination involved many factors and may have included a field visit, review of aerial photographs, geological quad sheets, county soils maps, and site specific information provided by you. A copy of the approved jurisdictional determination form and depiction of the geographic extent of Federal jurisdiction are enclosed. A Department of the Army permit may be required for work in areas identified as waters of the United States . Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps ' regulations at 33 CFR Part 331 . If you request to appeal this determination, you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division Office at the following address : Mr. Jason Steele South Atlantic Division U. S . Army Corps of Engineers CESAD-CM-CO-R, Room 9M15 60 Forsyth St . , SW. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 . Mr. Steele can be reached by telephone number at 404-562-5137, or by facsimile at 404-562-5138 . Exhibit G-7 -2- In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR Part 331 .5, and that it has been received by the Division office within 60 days of the date of the RFA. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by September 6, 2011 . The determination shown on the enclosed information represents the upland/wetland boundary for purposes of determining the Corps jurisdictional line. As depicted on the enclosed drawing, it has been determined you have waters of the United States onsite, which are subject to regulation by the Corps, and/or you have wetlands onsite which are considered to be isolated, and thus not subjected to regulation by the Corps . Please be advised that the jurisdictional determination shown is based on the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987) or current regional supplement, and is valid for a period no longer than 5 years from the date of this letter unless new information warrants a revision of the determination before the expiration date . If, after the 5-year period, the Corps has not specifically revalidated this jurisdictional determination, it shall automatically expire . Any reliance upon this jurisdictional determination beyond the expiration date may lead to possible violation of current Federal laws and/or regulations. You may request revalidation of the jurisdictional determination prior to the expiration date . Any revalidation or updating will be considered under the method of jurisdictional determination and other applicable regulations in use at the time of the request . Additionally, this determination has been based on information provided by you or your agent; should we determine that the information was incomplete or erroneous this delineation would be invalid. This determination has been conducted to identify the limits of the Corps Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request . This determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are U. S . Department of Agriculture (USDA) program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service prior to starting work. You are cautioned that work performed below the mean high water line or ordinary high water line in waters of the United States, or the discharge of dredged or fill material into adjacent wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit could subject you to enforcement action. Receipt of a permit from the -3- Department of Environmental Protection or the Water Management District does not obviate the requirement for obtaining a Department of the Army permit for the work described above prior to commencing work. The Corps' Jacksonville District Regulatory Division is committed to improving service to our customers . We strive to perform our duty in a friendly and timely manner while working to preserve our environment . We invite you to take a few minutes to visit http: //per2 .nwp.usace.army.mil/survey.html and complete our automated Customer Service Survey. Your input is appreciated - favorable or otherwise. Please be aware this web address is case sensitive and should be entered as it appears above . Thank you for your cooperation with our permit program. If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact Mr. Skip Bergmann by mail at the letterhead address, by electronic mail at Harry.W.Bergmann2 @usace .army.mil, or by telephone at 239- 334-1975 . Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED Donald W. Kinard Chief, Regulatory Division Enclosures Copy Furnished: (w/o encls) Mr. Thomas Trettis Stantec Consulting 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 ' NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND REQUEST FOR APPEAL Now Applicant: Olde Florida Golf Club Incorporated File Number: SAJ-1993-31697 Date: 6 July 2011 Attached is: See Section below INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B PERMIT DENIAL C X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E SECTION I-The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional information may be found at lii_M//www.usace.armyanil/CECW/Pages/ree materials.asp or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request that the permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may:(a)modify the permit to address all of your concerns,(b)modify the permit to address some of your objections,or(c)not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections,the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT:You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT. You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD(which may be appealed),by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. 0 SECTION II-REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting,and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may process you may contact: also contact: Project Manager as noted in letter Jason Steele 404-562-5137 RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,and any government consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations. Date: Telephone number: Signature of appellant or agent. • SAJ-RD-SF SAJ-1993-31697 (JD) MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD SUBJECT: Approved Jurisdictional Determination for Olde Florida Golf Club Incorporated, Phase II . 1 . Introduction: This is in reference to a request to the U.S . Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Jacksonville Districts (SAJ) to conduct an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) . The request was made by Olde Florida Golf Club Incorporated (file No. SAJ-1993-31697) for a project known as Olde Florida Golf Club, Phase II . The project site contains 5 separate isolated wetlands, which are the subject of this Memorandum for Record (MFR) . 2 . Project Location: The project site is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road approximately 5 miles east of Interstate 75 in Section 31, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The center of the parcel is located at Latitude 26 .251956 North and Longitude 81 . 651793 West. 3. Project History: Olde Florida Golf Club, Phase II, is the second phase of a two phase development (Attachment 1) planned in the late 80' s . The original project site was approximately 552 acres and included all of Section 31 minus a portion of the northeast corner. The Corps of Engineers inspected the site for wetlands on 31 May 1989, 14 June 1989, and 15 March 1990. The project site was dominated by hydric soils and numerous cypress strands . An approved JD was issued a JD on 14 May 1990 (SAJ- 90JD (4) 0101) . While the project site did contain jurisdictional wetlands, field notes indicate that the surrounding canals have had a significant impact on the area' s hydrology. The project site is bounded by the Immokalee or Cocohatchee Canal to the north, the Curry Canal to the east, and Cypress Canal to the south (Attachment 2) . Florida is in the Eleventh Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit' has concluded that the Kennedy standard is the sole method of determining CWA jurisdiction in that Circuit. Therefore, unless the aquatic resources are traditional navigable waters or wetlands adjacent to traditional navigable waters, the Corps needs to conduct a significant nexus determination on all other waters in order to determine jurisdiction under the CWA. United States v. McWane, Inc., et al. , 505 F.3d 1208 (11`h Cir. 2007) . Exhibit G-7 SAJ-1993-31697 Olde Florida Golf Club Phase II 2 Based on the verified JD conducted by the Corps of Engineers, the applicant divided the site into two parts . The first part avoided all jurisdictional areas and was identified as Phase I . The applicant submitted a permit application to develop Phase I as an 18-hole golf course and the Corps of Engineers issued a "no permit required" verification letter (SAJ-1991-01871) on 13 February 1992 . The remaining 258 acres of the property was identified as Phase II . An 18-hole golf course was also proposed for Phase II . Based on a depressed water table in the area the applicant installed shallow wells and requested that the Corps re-evaluate the earlier approved JD. The Corps of Engineers inspected the site on 8 & 17 September 1993, and issued a revised JD for Phase II (SAJ-1993-31697) on 15 December 1993. The wetland boundaries were smaller in 1993 based on the area' s lowered water table. The JD had a three-year expiration date. By letter dated 9 May 2011, the applicant requested that the Corps of Engineers conducts another JD for Phase II . The applicant provided wetland data forms and groundwater monitoring data from 18 wells installed within the project boundaries . Based on the applicant' s analysis, the site has five isolated areas (approximately 30 . 88 acres) that meet the Corps' definition of a wetland (Attachment 3) . The Corps of Engineers inspected the site on 24 May 2011 . All five wetland areas identified by the applicant are essentially borrow areas used in the construction of Phase I . The change in topography was obvious upon approaching each wetland. All five wetland areas were dominated by hydrophytic shrubs and herbaceous vegetation including saw grass, cattails, and buttonbush. All five wetland areas lack a tree strata although there were scattered willows and pop ash. The area surrounding the five wetland areas resembled other wetland areas in Golden Gate Estates where the hydrology has been removed. Cypress trees are covered with poison ivy and ground cover is dominated by muscadine grape. Well data provided by the applicant supports the depressed water table. The closest groundwater monitoring well to the Cypress Canal is Well L. Well L is located approximately 1800 feet north of the Cypress Canal and is installed in an area with a ground SAJ-1993-31697 Olde Florida Golf Club Phase II 3 elevation of 12 . 89 feet (NGVD) . Groundwater never came within 6 inches of the surface at this well between 2006-2010 except for once in the 2008 wet season . Groundwater at Well L stays around 10 . 00 feet or slightly higher for most of the year, with a typical wet season spike of about 11 . 3 feet but quickly recedes back to 10 . 00-10 . 5 NGVD range. Water level in the Cypress Canal is controlled between 9. 75 and 10 . 5 feet. Well data tends to correspond with relative water levels in the Cypress Canal . Ground elevations on the project site vary from 13 . 5 feet in the north to 12 . 7 feet in the south near Cypress Canal . The elevation in wetland #4 is near 11 feet. Based on the site inspection and the well data provided by the applicant, the Corps of Engineers concurs with the applicant that only five areas within Phase II meet the federal definition of wetland. While much of the other areas on the site were historically wetland, they no longer satisfy the hydrology criteria and are classified as uplands . South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) uses slightly different criteria than the federal government to identify wetlands . Never-the-less, SFWMD inspected the site and also concurred with the applicant that there are only five wetlands (30 . 88 acres) or other surface waters on the project site (SFWMD letter dated 15 December 2010 regarding Petition for Formal Determination of Wetlands and Surface Waters) . 4. Watershed: According to the U. S . Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) , the project site is located within the Everglades West Coast Sub-Basin (HUC 03090204) . The Everglades West Coast Sub-Basin is also known as the Big Cypress Swamp and includes all of southwest Florida south of the Caloosahatchee River Basin. The Everglades West Coast Sub-Basin includes southern Lee and Hendry Counties, all of Collier County, and very small portions of western Dade, Broward, and northern Monroe Counties and is approximately 2, 710 square miles is size . A further division of the Everglades West Coast Sub-Basin at the project site into watersheds and sub watersheds identifies the entire project site as within the Naples Frontal watershed (HUC 0309020405) (Attachment 4) . The Naples Frontal watershed can also be further divided into three sub-watershed; Curry Island Drain (HUC 030902040502) , Golden Gate Drain (HUC 030902040503) , and Clam Pass - Doctors Pass Frontal (HUC 030902040504) (Attachment 5) . SAJ-1993-31697 Olde Florida Golf Club Phase II 4 The actual flow pattern in the vicinity of the project site is shown on Attachment 6 . Actual drainage boundaries are difficult to determine because of the many equalizer canals . During high water conditions, flows from Bird Rookery Swamp can move southeast into Golden Gate Estates and into the Corkscrew Canal system. These flows are joined by flows from Twin Eagles and can move west into the Immokalee Road Canal, south under Immokalee Road into Curry Canal, or east and south under Immokalee Road into the main Corkscrew Canal . There is an equalizer canal between the Corkscrew Canal and Curry Canal and another equalizer between the Main Golden Gate Canal and Corkscrew Canal . The Curry Canal and an equalizer from the Corkscrew Canal flow west and form the Cypress Canal. The Cypress Canal flows west and south until converging with the Main Golden Gate Canal . The Main Golden Gate Canal flows into the Gordon River, which is the nearest Traditional Navigable Water. Gordon River flows south into Naples Bay and out into the Gulf of Mexico via Gordon Pass . 5. Determination of Relevant Reach: Based on the Golden Gate Estates canal system and other known drainage systems in the vicinity, the Corps of Engineers has determined that the closest tributary to the project site is Cypress Canal . The pertinent section of Cypress Canal or relevant reach for purposes of determining a significant nexus was not determined since the subject wetlands are isolated. 6. Adjacent Wetlands: Adjacent means bordering, contiguous, or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S . by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are adjacent (See 33 CFR 328 . 3 (c) ) . For purposes of this jurisdictional determination the Corps has classified each of the on-site wetlands into one of the following categories : • Abutting Wetlands: Wetlands that directly abut a tributary are called abutting wetlands . Abutting wetlands have a continuous or unbroken surface connection to the tributary. There are no man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like between the wetland and the tributary. SAJ-1993-31697 Olde Florida Golf Club Phase II 5 • Adjacent wetlands by surface water connection: Wetlands that are physically separated from jurisdictional waters by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like, but have a continuous surface water connection to jurisdictional waters . This hydrologic connection can be in the form of culverts, pipes, drainage swales, ditches, or other surface water conveyance features . The connection may be intermittent and range in length from a few feet to several hundred feet. These are called adjacent wetlands with a surface water connection to the tributary. • Adjacent wetlands by shallow subsurface flow: Wetlands that have no surface water connection to jurisdictional waters; but, have a hydrologic connection via shallow subsurface flow between the wetland and jurisdictional waters . These are called adjacent wetlands with shallow subsurface flow. Shallow subsurface flow is determined by examining the seepage potential of the soils . While most of the mineral soils in southwest Florida have high seepage potential, wetlands separated from a tributary by hydric soil have a higher potential to satisfy this criteria. This category includes wetlands bisected by canals, roads, berms or other barriers that have divided the wetlands into two or more parts, whereas, aerial photographs, soil maps, NWI map, or other documents clearly identify the divided wetland as historically, one larger wetland system. • Adjacent wetlands by proximity: A final criteria includes wetlands that are adjacent to jurisdictional waters by proximity. These wetlands are reasonably close to jurisdictional waters and have an inferred ecological interconnection to jurisdictional waters . No guidance has been provided to define "reasonably close" . There is no hydrologic connection to jurisdictional waters, either surface or subsurface. These are called adjacent wetlands by proximity. • Isolated wetlands : Wetlands without an ecological interconnection and without a hydrologic connection to jurisdictional waters, either surface or subsurface, are classified as isolated wetlands . SAJ-1993-31697 Olde Florida Golf Club Phase II 6 According to the above definitions the Corps of Engineers has determined the following: On-Site Waters Wetland or Adjacency Wetland Area Water Number Classification or (acres) Water Area (acres) Water Type Wetland 1 Isolated 5.14 Wetland 2 Isolated 0.04 Wetland 3 Isolated 2. 91 Wetland 4 isolated 19.91 Wetland 5 Isolated 2.88 Totals 30.88 0.00 7 . Jurisdictional Determination: There are 5 wetland areas (30 .88 acres) within Phase II of Olde Florida Golf Club. These wetlands are not part of the drainage or irrigation system, nor are they a part of any surface water management area. All 5 areas were excavated for fill material and have developed wetland characteristics based on their proximity to the water table. The largest of these wetlands is Wetland No. 4 (19. 91 acres) . These wetlands have no direct flow or indirect surface or shallow subsurface flow to jurisdictional waters and the Corps can find no ecological interconnection between these wetlands and the nearest jurisdictional water. The closest jurisdictional water is Cypress Canal and the closest wetland to Cypress Canal is Wetland No. 1, which is 1, 130 feet away. After a close examination of these 5 wetlands, the Corps has determined that these wetlands are not adjacent to Cypress Canal or any other jurisdictional water. These 5 wetlands are non- navigable, intrastate, and are classified as isolated wetlands . Pursuant to the Supreme Court decision (SWANCC) , isolated waters are not jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act. APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S.Army Corps of Engineers This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook. SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD): B. DISTRICT OFFICE,FILE NAME,AND NUMBER:SAJ-1 993-3 1 6 97 JD C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State:Florida County/parish/borough:Collier City: Unincorporated Center coordinates of site(lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.26.41814°N,Long.81.67931°W. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody:Cypress Canal Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water(TNW)into which the aquatic resource flows:Main Golden Gate Canal Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC): Everglades West Coast(HUC 03090204). Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request. El Check if other sites(e.g.,offsite mitigation sites,disposal sites,etc...)are associated with this action and are recorded on a different JD form. D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office(Desk)Determination. Date: ® Field Determination. Date(s):24 May 2011 SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S."within Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 329)in the review area.[Required] ❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. ❑ Waters are presently used,or have been used in the past,or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. Explain: B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There Are no"waters of the U.S."within Clean Water Act(CWA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 328)in the review area.[Required] 1. Waters of the U.S. a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S.in review area(check all that apply): t El TNWs,including territorial seas ❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs El Relatively permanent waters'(RPWs)that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs El Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs El Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs El Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters ® Isolated(interstate or intrastate)waters,including isolated wetlands b. Identify(estimate)size of waters of the U.S.in the review area: Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width(ft)and/or acres. Wetlands: acres. c.Limits(boundaries)of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual Elevation of established OHWM(if known): 2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands(check if applicable):' El Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional. Explain: 5 separate wetlands within the project and all are isolated. Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below. -For purposes of this form,an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least"seasonally" (e.g.,typically 3 months). Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F. SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW,complete Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1.only;if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW,complete Sections HI.A.1 and 2 and Section III.D.1.;otherwise,see Section III.B below. 1. TNW Identify TNW: Summarize rationale supporting determination: 2. Wetland adjacent to TNW Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is"adjacent": B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY(THAT IS NOT A TNW)AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS(IF ANY): This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands,if any,and it helps determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met. The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are"relatively permanent waters"(RPWs),i.e.tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally(e.g.,typically 3 months).A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional.If the aquatic resource is not a TNW,but has year-round (perennial)flow,skip to Section III.D.2.If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow, skip to Section III.D.4. A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation.Corps districts and EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial(and its adjacent wetlands if any)and a traditional navigable water,even though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law. If the waterbody4 is not an RPW,or a wetland directly abutting an RPW,a JD will require additional data to determine if the waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW.If the tributary has adjacent wetlands,the significant nexus evaluation must consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands.This significant nexus evaluation that combines,for analytical purposes,the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is the tributary,or its adjacent wetlands,or both.If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands,complete Section III.B.1 for the tributary,Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands,and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary,both onsite and offsite.The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below. 1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) General Area Conditions: Watershed size: Pick List Drainage area: Pick List Average annual rainfall: inches Average annual snowfall: inches (ii) Physical Characteristics: (a) Relationship with TNW: ❑Tributary flows directly into TNW. ❑Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW. Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW. Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW. Project waters are Pick List aerial(straight)miles from TNW. Project waters are Pick List aerial(straight)miles from RPW. Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries.Explain: Identify flow route to TNW5: Tributary stream order,if known: Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales,ditches,washes,and erosional features generally and in the arid West. 'Flow route can be described by identifying,e.g.,tributary a,which flows through the review area,to flow into tributary b,which then flows into TNW. (b) General Tributary Characteristics(check all that apply): Tributary is: ❑Natural ❑Artificial(man-made). Explain: ❑Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: Tributary properties with respect to top of bank(estimate): Average width: feet Average depth: feet Average side slopes:Pick List. Primary tributary substrate composition(check all that apply): ❑ Silts ❑Sands ❑Concrete ❑Cobbles ❑Gravel ❑Muck ❑Bedrock ❑Vegetation. Type/%cover: ❑Other.Explain: Tributary condition/stability[e.g.,highly eroding,sloughing banks]. Explain: Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: Tributary geometry: Pick List Tributary gradient(approximate average slope): (c) Flow: Tributary provides for:Pick List Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:Pick List Describe flow regime: Other information on duration and volume: Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics: Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings: ❑Dye(or other)test performed: Tributary has(check all that apply): ❑Bed and banks ❑ OHWM6(check all indicators that apply): ❑ clear,natural line impressed on the bank ❑ the presence of litter and debris ❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ shelving ❑ the presence of wrack line ❑ vegetation matted down,bent,or absent ❑ sediment sorting ❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ scour ❑ sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events ❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community ❑ other(list): ❑Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain: If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction(check all that apply): ❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑survey to available datum; ❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑physical markings; ❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. ❑ tidal gauges ❑ other(list): (iii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize tributary(e.g.,water color is clear,discolored,oily film;water quality;general watershed characteristics,etc.). Explain: Identify specific pollutants,if known: 6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction(e.g.,where the stream temporarily flows underground,or where the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow regime(e.g.,flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert),the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break. 'Ibid. (iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports(check all that apply): ❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics(type,average width): ❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: ❑ Habitat for: ❑Federally Listed species. Explain findings: ❑Fish/spawn areas.Explain findings: ❑Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: ❑Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: 2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) Physical Characteristics: (a) General Wetland Characteristics: Properties: Wetland size: acres Wetland type. Explain: Wetland quality. Explain: Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries.Explain: (b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW: Flow is:Pick List.Explain: Surface flow is:Pick List Characteristics: Subsurface flow:Pick List. Explain findings: ❑Dye(or other)test performed: (c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW: ❑Directly abutting ❑Not directly abutting ❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: ❑ Ecological connection. Explain: ❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: (d) Proximity(Relationship)to TNW Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW. Project waters are Pick List aerial(straight)miles from TNW. Flow is from:Pick List. Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain. (ii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize wetland system(e.g.,water color is clear,brown,oil film on surface;water quality;general watershed characteristics;etc.). Explain: Identify specific pollutants,if known: (iii)Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports(check all that apply): ❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics(type,average width): ❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: ❑ Habitat for: ❑Federally Listed species. Explain findings: ❑Fish/spawn areas.Explain findings: ❑Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: . ❑Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: 3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary(if any) All wetland(s)being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List Approximately( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis. For each wetland,specify the following: Directly abuts?(Y/N) Size(in acres) Directly abuts?(Y/N) Size(in acres) Summarize overall biological,chemical and physical functions being performed: C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical,physical,and biological integrity of a TNW. For each of the following situations,a significant nexus exists if the tributary,in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands,has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical,physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include,but are not limited to the volume,duration,and frequency of the flow of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW,and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance(e.g.between a tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW).Similarly,the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus. Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW,as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and discussed in the Instructional Guidebook.Factors to consider include,for example: • Does the tributary,in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any),have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs,or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW? • Does the tributary,in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any),provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and other species,such as feeding,nesting,spawning,or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW? • Does the tributary,in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any),have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that support downstream foodwebs? • Does the tributary,in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any),have other relationships to the physical,chemical,or biological integrity of the TNW? Note:the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented below: 1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below,based on the tributary itself,then go to Section III.D: . 2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands,where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below,based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands,then go to Section III.D: 3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW.Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below,based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands,then go to Section I1l.D: D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS.THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area: ❑TNWs: linear feet width(ft),Or, acres. ❑Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres. 2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional.Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial: ❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow"seasonally"(e.g.,typically three months each year)are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section II1.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally: Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width(ft). ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s)of waters: 3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW,but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW,and it has a significant nexus with a TNW is jurisdictional.Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area(check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width(ft). ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s)of waters: 4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands. ❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2,above.Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW: ❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow"seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2,above.Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW: Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. Q Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW,but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands,have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional.Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters,and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands,have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional.Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9 As a general rule,the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional. ❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from"waters of the U.S.,"or O Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above(1-6),or ❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce(see E below). E. ISOLATED[INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS,INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS,THE USE, DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE,INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):70 ❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes. O from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. ❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. ❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain: ❑ Other factors. Explain: Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: 'See Footnote#3. 9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section Ill.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook. 1°Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category,Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos. Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width(ft). ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s)of waters: ❑ Wetlands: acres. F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS,INCLUDING WETLANDS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area,these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements. ® Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate(or foreign)commerce. ® Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in"SWANCC,"the review area would have been regulated based solely on the "Migratory Bird Rule"(MBR). O Waters do not meet the"Significant Nexus"standard,where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: . El Other:(explain,if not covered above): Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area,where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR factors(i.e.,presence of migratory birds,presence of endangered species,use of water for irrigated agriculture),using best professional judgment(check all that apply): ❑ Non-wetland waters(i.e.,rivers,streams): linear feet width(ft). ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.List type of aquatic resource: ® Wetlands:30.88 acres. Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the"Significant Nexus"standard,where such a finding is required for jurisdiction(check all that apply): ❑ Non-wetland waters(i.e.,rivers,streams): linear feet, width(ft). ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. ❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: ❑ Wetlands: acres. SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES. A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD(check all that apply-checked items shall be included in case file and,where checked and requested,appropriately reference sources below): ® Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: ® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters'study: ® U.S.Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑USGS NHD data. ®USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ❑ U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name: ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.Citation: ® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs:❑Aerial(Name&Date): or❑Other(Name&Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no.and date of response letter: ❑ Applicable/supporting case law: ❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature: ❑ Other information(please specify): B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:A MFR was prepared for the project site and should be attached to this form. c13 L Q LL C _ Z Q cU cn U N N L as _c .0 0 LJ N d —CT C 4! 000 C LOO U L1.1 L +, M 4— W v v C I -0 m vi — i L !� U- f13 L m co L a Z La O vai t. r L L F�- `� it ., v '3 ,, �_ , O (./1 (./-) +1.:" I ■ ■ 4 71 ♦ v tai(:, v A f LA I 1 2 , • r m 7 !. , ry N L` . .) 5 '. } ` S 4 . r .. II'V 4.._ a i o J CZ MI ■ O ♦ �h r O U ca Q 03 5- 0 U- U- 52 C _ D CD 0 L/ V co L N a — O v r C> w { r.,•. A CD O V Qi v) U ics k . ' C -+, 1 • t 4,x y q 11 m ✓ D m■ •M • f \ :a J 1 ,• -. _ r ' 1. MI T, Fir a, 1 , • VI e V xT + Q V - 1 '" 4 j a N CD it.\ . i• _ • •M ,ae nwasr. i ... ., ° _C E Co a-, Q co 73 'L 0 4-, C CU I', U ca s- _C N CL •- -0 o = U U '- L.L.T. f `~ N. / n CFI (7 CC • co ri -a m 00 1 ,,/' ' t. . . 4J I rl M �"r ' • O v) v)cis 73 • C L1'1 C'• CU • • -' (/') f ..3 ■ e-1 1t , ti ^ I + Ar ti ., � t. ,, . ---g.- , ti� M 4-' C CU E U 4-, 4-, Q i C -OM 's 0 I A s C 0 i vi U Ms _C N CL — _0 0 = U U w . `!— N 1 0 N . (0 c-I 0 ' 1- 4.,7 u_ o F- `- 73 7 m F. _, •,,, ..,.: j J •- c +a+ o oa V o O C , L. -.11r 171.. 0 1_ - a._ ,lam':= Xy), t r V 4 , � -� �� No CI 0 r C N . or 7" El r O p X ' ,. . .. r 60 t IC' ■ p 1 ! SY t•N No `#'.1=/ . s -- 4: a. • ra D O ��_ n_'. . N Oft'. .; cf. :—.- st QJ — N '� O ..._ N C .r c>3 0 E •� ,,.., U ® cn D 0 U 2 .;� +-, Q c13 73 0 u- 5... C CU ccn U ro L a - ,� 'c -2o U ui N t= � � � ;7. J O m cri 73 L -0 _. M (1) O N v) co Ir' s3^ ` f - O ` N. ,; ' 4-1 U y = . : L 1,r. / - p M Q Co 0 .., —e �_ N N O L If) 4J nt I - ice_ O C N C M 0 N O .� O CO v) O v O p O p O 0 im a; O 1^ � O . O I 4-+ C N co N cn u C _ 7-,,. O 6,.., E > m C) m u O "C O ''to o L +• C U O U O Q U D C!7 D U —I—t r1 = N = CO• li CD L a LL _ C 0 0.1 U Co L Q) 0) ._ 2 U •V� O N (, -o m N • . it�p d� `rile p m LT.to 1 v) v O I a +.0 . . ._ Lt_l_,.. . . ...... u „...... .. � ° ti r _ .2 . o. » /-n co U _t. J n . N • as Q U r� -0 c +c- L co v"- CO U N i -N U) (B 22 5,..... U C C C U UD LE - v cu } O '4- N v V) UC)) N v7 O Co if) Q1 U C CO C 4-' • .C v Cu C U S co Q) -s,..., c -ol '471 ..c.— ' rz — no u u CO) CO) O CO 0 Q C O C , =.. I ,r r o t. . .. ' « --i• ,, ' _ - _ X W - t. 1 Cr) C '-i O 0 — N (a .rt,.:r. - N e—I 01 O. I- < a, a. a ar O. re., C co N L fa m N N IA fa L a xw - U co v X. > ' 0 C a ■r t . BYO •�* « • . Paz. 6, N. w 7 - (O '-1 • :.\.: \A\lip' ' ';;:--- ► t w' .'-*-^ 'ar ,1:r p I , 1 ' _ ` / ! �/-. N%�I -.... - - ' •-•. . - •-... , _ itilliiiiricl';'.1.- "4 - ' ' O nel v. eie IIP ....r mumri •o+ NNW UMW v 111111111 r NM V m IMMO V RNG 26 RNG 27 1"=4300' � I I Q TWP 47 01 TWP 48 I � C.)� LEE COUNTY COLL ER COUNTY 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 a 14 13 — 15 18 17 16 O n . O n C.• Cil 19 .4 20 21 22 23 24 Q Nine CR200 Pen Camp SR. 846 30 29 28 27 m 26 25 30 29 cn rn X 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 ar I LEGENQ = INDICATES AREAS OF HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY INDICATES HISTORIC STRUCTURE (NOT TO SCALE) CORKSCREW SW QUADRANGLE INDICATES ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (NOT TO SCALE) AREAS OF HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY 1-1--r—"IP INDICATES HISTORIC DISTRICT O CSCREWSW. C 3/74/97 COUJE9 COUNTY LONG 9MGE►UNMNO OPMMEM NINO Viso Mlle MO MO S Mr ONO 11111111111 - - Mit - err mere- semi errs worst wows RNG 26 RNG 27 31 32 33 34 35 36 332 TWP 48 TWP 49 4 3 2 1 6 5 6 5 GOLDEN GATE :OULEVARD I - 9' 1 0 11 12 O 7 8 C. . tD -n r il 5- o m.a A, su o' 0 = o_ o 17 16 15 � 14 13 -1, -+ 18 0 n . a C , ci C. 0 _ a E-4. 1"=4300' a d 1) 19 20 21 22 23 24 co a V) QQ4 OP is O\9 30 29 G 28 27 26 25 •CR231 INTERSTATE 75 34 •CR230 31 32 33 35 36 I-75 CR 856 (RADIO ROAD) - TWP 49 ' TWP 50 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4'1 SR. 84 (DAVIS BLVD.) ,,if; rn a U X 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 a MIMI II cr PSI - LEGEND I INDICATES AREAS OF HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY * INDICATES HISTORIC STRUCTURE (NOT TO SCALE) BELLE MEADE NW QUADRANGLE • INDICATES ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (NOT TO SCALE) • AREAS OF HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY 1 --r-L'i INDICATES HISTORIC DISTRICT O I Ab Mw.owa 3/22/I3 COLUtU cowry Ut 10 NMaC PtANNim OtPMTNFNT EXHIBIT H-1 CONSULTANT SUMMARY - 4/23/13 In March, 2013, the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) conducted a reconnaissance cultural resource assessment for the Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc., located in Collier County. The parcel is located in Township 48S, Range 27E, Sections 31 (Figure 1). The parcel was surveyed to locate and assess any sites of archaeological and/or historical significance. This assessment was conducted to fulfill historic resource requirements in response to the State of Florida historic preservation guidelines. The work and the report conform to the specifications set forth in Chapter IA-46, Florida Administrative Code. The 553.7 acre parcel encompasses a golf course and undeveloped woodlands. The natural areas are characterized with a mosaic of pinewoods and remnant cypress. Exotic trees have been increasing in population in recent years as well as expanding communities of cabbage palms as a result of drier conditions. A site search with the Florida Division of Historic Resources determined that no previously recorded archaeological sites occur in the subject parcel. This reconnaissance cultural resource assessment indicated that the parcel has an overall low to medium probability for cultural resources based on a review of vintage and modern aerial photographic imagery and an extensive field reconnaissance of the parcel. The cultural resource assessment included a vehicular and pedestrian survey as well as judgmental shovel testing. A total of 49 shovel tests were excavated in low to medium probability areas for archaeological sites. All other project areas were either heavily disturbed or were considered to have a low probability for archaeological resources. One archaeological site was recorded as a result of this assessment. The site is characterized by two non-local chert flakes found on the disturbed surface. These flakes are consistent with the Archaic Period (ca. 7000 to 3000 BP), and likely represents a small prehistoric camp. The paucity of the material and the disturbances associated with the site indicate that, based on available data, the site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. It is recommended that an archaeologist conduct intermittent monitoring of ground- disturbing activities during development. If any archaeological materials or features are encountered they should be fully documented. tII�TO/ti 1 9 ..C�� r I r %, , x il ..,..), ,,,.. .,..„, A RECONNAISANCE CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB PARCEL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC. j ; . -L. r b 4 t , r, rt1 49X-4. r f S^a5� .dl k q. r..* - AHC TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 982 APRIL 2013 Exhibit H-2 A RECONNAISANCE CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB PARCEL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Robert S. Carr, M.S. John Wesley White, B.A. Michael Grady, B.A. John Beriault, B.A. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC. 4800 SW 64th Avenue, Suite 107 Davie, Florida 33314 954-792-9776 archlgcl@bellsouth.net For: OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB, INC. AHC PROJECT NO. 2013.29 AHC TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 982 APRIL 2013 r20 Ms-'4N yR TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES II CONSULTANT SUMMARY 1 PROJECT SETTING 3 PREVIOUS RESEARCH 11 CULTURAL SUMMARY 17 METHODOLOGY 27 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 30 SUMMARY OF SITE 31 REFERENCES CITED 33 APPENDIX I: FLORIDA SURVEY LOG 43 APPENDIX II: FLORIDA SITE FORM 8CR1305 45 i LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. USGS map of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel 2 Figure 2. 1874 plat map for Township 48S, Range 27E, with the project parcel boundaries superimposed 5 Figure 3. 1943 Copeland map Township 48S, Range 27E, with the project parcel boundaries superimposed 6 Figure 4. 1953 black &white aerial photograph of the project parcel 7 Figure 5. 1991 color aerial orthophotograph of the project parcel 8 Figure 6. Map showing soil types found in the project parcel 9 Figure 7. Shovel testing in a newly emerging cabbage palm hammock 10 Figure 8. Road trail crossing an oak ridge 10 Figure 9. USGS map showing previously recorded sites within one mile of the project parcel 16 Figure 10. 2011 aerial photograph showing the location of probability areas and shovel tests 29 Figure 11. Oak Grove site 8CR1305 looking north 32 Figure 12. Closeup of 8CR1305 and lithic flake 32 It CONSULTANT SUMMARY In March, 2013,the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) conducted a reconnaissance cultural resource assessment of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel located in Collier County. The assessment was conducted for the Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. The parcel is located in Township 48S, Range 27E, Sections 31 (Figure 1). The parcel was surveyed to locate and assess any sites of archaeological and/or historical significance. This assessment was conducted to fulfill historic resource requirements in response to State of Florida and Collier County historic preservation guidelines. The work and the report conform to the specifications set forth in Chapter IA-46, Florida Administrative Code. The 553.7 acre parcel encompasses a golf course and undeveloped woodlands. The natural areas are characterized with a mosaic of pinewoods, oak forest, and remnant cypress ponds and sloughs. Exotic trees have been increasing in population in recent years. Communities of native cabbage palms also have expanded due to drier conditions. A site search with the Florida Division of Historic Resources determined that no previously recorded archaeological sites occur in the subject parcel. This reconnaissance cultural resource assessment indicated that the parcel has an overall low to medium probability for cultural resources based on a review of vintage and modem aerial photographic imagery and an extensive field reconnaissance of the parcel. The cultural resource assessment included a vehicular and pedestrian survey as well as judgmental and systematic shovel testing. A total of 70 shovel tests were excavated in low to medium probability areas for archaeological sites. Untested were wetlands and areas that had been previously cleared and developed,all of which are considered to have a low probability for significant archaeological resources. Nonetheless, all of these areas were subject to a pedestrian survey. One archaeological site, 8CR1305, was recorded as a result of this assessment. The site is characterized by two non-local chert flakes found on the disturbed surface. These flakes are consistent with the Archaic Period(ca. 7000 to 3000 BP), and likely represent a small prehistoric camp. The paucity of cultural material and the disturbances associated with the site indicate that, based on available data, the site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Because of the large size of the parcel and the existence of at least one Archaic Period site, it is recommended that an archaeologist conduct intermittent monitoring of ground- disturbing activities during development. If any archaeological materials or features are encountered they should be fully documented. 1 N., '' I 4.1111411) .. --: . ., • ..... 1........! ••• ''. 0-,.,'-•-..''''a:1 r.-'' .s,.,., '4 ,i,i';1.t".... -;-,-,:i_o_-.---A -.._ ••••.;-. - -- - -- .•••=-- •,,, - 1 • I. i ',1_ .• ,,,. :,,---,.,,;;;;, •.4 — .., , .1, ellifilifflidaNIIIIMIIMIONe. .- - - - - .... ANL ,.....1. .., .., 4•• -..., . -•34- - ''... ' 4■4'..::4.i . ..,7,.. 4.4. .... ,,, .. ..... I( 4,,r • ,,,,,_■••• ,,,,,, N'•,!........:1•• ' . . .• ....• , • 1 ...I., ' II. ..- . II •• . ...4. • •••' ..... .... ...4 t 1 ..• . '' ,.... .... , , . - +. ,•,. ... i' .7., 1. •,., 1".. • k - ... ,, ......, ...''''` • ,,,, • 1,-, -..... : 14'--".., 41. . ''..• .. '• • • "' ''''' • • 4'rt‘•0 0..• : .,..•_•AO. -• ' ;,, '''. . . •. •f...........411--...;..., _ ........ -..,i4t,. ... 25 r • , .• ,c-•---• • ••._ .... ..,...... 4, ....... .. .1 , .•,- • • — - •. .7• - ,.. .. 2 . 1 • ...., f.,• ..„ .0- , _,,,,,4 .•., _ ,..,, at,,V .4,o.,, „, .....gm, ......,...,..., ,- • 1,4. _... .... "I'0.. %I 41. •''''' ••• %1 ' . ' "*•.' '''' 14.---'',.....--' V- e .... .,_ ,.." „., _.[...v. • .....- ...to- ..■ ,..., .. ... ..- .." O....=MAU 0K, ,........ ■'.'" We. . ....• . :34.. -, ,• •• ■3• ., ..•• _,,,... ... ,... -,,, ...... .,,,47 .1, '.,, t , ., ..4,1”:'..,.. • .•• .0. . • -. 4,, .........^•■ ., t .4. , -' .1.. ' 4 " .4' •••••.:7„,._ .... ,..., ,,,,,,,,.... ..... -*-•-- . •• St, , „., :i. ,,g,,Al $` ... -4. :::44: t 4.47. t ..t.' , g. t •44 t'' t... t,...■••• 'AM.-Z.'''.4.4-tf,;!:-11 r. ..., ... , •ty,-.2,-... , , .:,,,,... ..„,.. .0",1,. 4, ..- ,..4 „4„„ o: ...".... ".* .4 -ft , ...,. ,,.. ... --- ,....,.. ,.. ....-- .„,.....'-...4 ... Air,- . • : . -* 4.4 '41., os.-... — .„,. - -.. ....,"'• _ ' -, -”--7,,,, ,., 4.: • (''': ,•• ' . ........,,..,. „,....., . v.- 4.... , 2.'.44 .... *-°,0• 1 '''''''''' ' ' 40 ... ,a. -"",..- -22' • `.0 ...,. ,,.. ' ,..., +0., '• ' ' '''' Oa ,.., ••• ..., . .._ ... ....° .. ..0.7. 47 4.7* ' -..4 ..., '',..,4''''••-'''' . •)• '''' 7 ; ..i.,. " - ' * .. ** -* * ' . .-.44, .... ..... -. . 't• '' j '''' _... ,.. cp. ..4. ,,„,„ . -. * ,,..-..7.,,,- ** - '''' . -ry ...... ... ..., *..,..,„A..... • ,,, ,(' „.,. •s• ...... .•-• . ” ..- .• '''' ^•'.....-*..... 4. * "'" ......''' ^.-' ' :e.. `,' ''''' ^ ',---'''' •' -* - ,.. — - "6 7-7..... •••:' -.. ...., „..,.... ., .,-4. 4, ...,.... ,,,.., ••0^ ..., . .... . ,,, ,., . 4 3,,..) ....... •,•- '''' .... '.,.. .."'"' ''''' •••. ...4.. '•••' -.5, A.- '''.• t''',,,h. "' 4a 1 -r-.....'''' 4.,,,,,,, '''4 ,, .. . - ..... R,..___ % ... 4...., , .. ... ...4.....‘„, ,, ...... ' ,."-- ,,.. .....- ........ ..• 41..- •••• .,.. •'` .., ; a . , ..1..-• .....,_._...........-....-.,.........-..... 11 . ' A ..... .. 0.......o........-Ir's...-..... —•- I J . , • I . / . I I . . • • • • / . • • . i• . . ..• . d • . ii • I .: . • • • 1 .: • t 8 . . I • • • I • i 1 ; , 4 • A * •1 . -. . • • 1 • 6 . 1 . • / NA • . . . t''''''• - . I . . i-, • 8 i. ,, • 7."•-.-1: . i I t i . 1 i . 1 ; •• I / i • Figure 1. USGS Map of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel. # TOWNSHIP 48S,RANGE 27E.SECTION 31 I USGS Map: CORKSCREW SW,REV 1987 0 0 .8 1 1/4 1/2 .4 1 Mile approx. 1.6 Km. approx. 2 PROJECT SETTING The project parcel is located in Section 31 in Township 48S, Range 27E ten miles northeast of the City of Naples in northwest Collier County(Figure 1). The parcel lies east of County Road 951 (Collier Boulevard) approximately one mile south of the Immokalee Road (CR846). The parcel, totaling 553.7 acres, is irregular in shape with the straight borders oriented to the cardinal points.The relevant USGS map is Corkscrew SW,Fla. The project area largely consists of southern slash pine/saw palmetto flatwoods, oak communities, low pond cypress forests, and linear cypress sloughs. Although much of the area is natural woodland a considerable portion of it has been impacted by a golf course. There are expanding communities of invasive exotic plants such as meleleauca (meleleauca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), propagated in disturbances along the edges of the golf course where rocks and piles of sediment have been mechanically pushed up. Bird Rookery Slough drained the area to the north and west of the project area while to the south water drained southwesterly through a series of cypress sloughs. To the west between the coast and the interior are a series of linear sand hills that were remnant Pleistocene marine terraces shaped by subsequent wind activity. Vintage color and black and white aerial photographs of the project parcel depict two prominent linear ridges of higher ground with oak and pinewoods running southeast/northwest. Between them is an area of lower ground that may be a remnant prairie. The ridges may be Pleistocene in origin and be similar to the north-south linear ridges observed running in parallel bands inland from the coastline. These areas of higher elevation are often associated with archaeological sites. These ridges are prominently depicted in the 1943 Graham Copeland map(Figure 3). Historically, the general area was part of a dense slough running south as an extension of the Corkscrew Swamp/Bird Rookery Slough. The first state surveyors encountered "impracticable" conditions as they approached the seven-mile-wide swath of low-lying swamps. Surveyor W.L. Apthorp describes conditions 80 chains along the south border of Township 48S,Range 27 East on April 26th, 1872 as: "Heavy cypress swamp and tall boggy sawgrass with water a foot deep even at this dry season—wide deep sawgrass slough ahead surrounded by dense cypress swamp. Impracticable to go farther,Relinquish line..." Another line being run into the slough had the notation: "To round pond surrounded by bay and cypress swamp, impracticable. Pond full of monstrous alligators. Control 50 and stopped—relinquish line." Consequently,parts of Township 48S Range 26 East and Township 48S,Range 27E were not surveyed until modern times(Figure 2). The vegetative communities that dominate much of the project parcel are cabbage palm 3 (Sabal palmetto) hammocks, cypress (Taxodium distichum) strands and solution ponds and a community of succulent marsh plants such as fire flag (Thalia geniculata), arrowhead (Sagittaria spp.), and pickerelweed (Pontederia lanceolata). Small stands or groves of pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana) and buttonbush (Cephalthanthus occidentalis) provide a woody midstory growth along marsh edges. In the cabbage palm hammocks are remnants, alive and dead, of large slash pine (Pinus elliotii var. densa). In the eastern portions of the parcel are portions of a large strand system of bald cypress and pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens). Throughout the parcel the cabbage palms occur in dense, low canopy formations. Many appear to be immature and emerging from what may have been grass prairies or clearings. Toward the north and western areas of the tract the cabbage palms form a dense and mature hammock with a canopy height of 20+feet. The geology of the area is characterized by solutioned and chalky limestone caprocks lying exposed or overlain to various depths by sands 2or shelly marls. In cypress sloughs, but particularly in cypress dome/solution ponds there are potentially deep deposits of muck or peat. A fine gray to tan sand found extensively in the district is Immokalee fine sand which usually overlies relict marine deposits of shelly marl and limestone caprock that are part of the Pleistocene Caloosahatchee formation. These marine marls contain lenses and deposits of clay intermixed with varying percentages of sand. These clays may have been a source for ceramic manufacture by the Formative period Native Americans. Both the Caloosahatchee marls and the associated limestone caprock contain the index fossil bivalve, Chione cancellata in quantity. Depths of sand or marl overburden seldom exceeded 60 centimeters. Many higher ground formations in the area appear to be bedrock unconformities that consist of fully exposed tabular slabs of limestone caprock containing numerous rounded solution holes. 4 11,1_TI8S R 27 E k„ 4 • • I • it, 6640066 1D4f -• ? ' 6 II/1110 - - • le Amt.. AIM Of A... H4...11141°P.10644.; ' 4. I 00 eV('4 .1 Figure 2. 1874 plat map for Township 48S,Range 27E with the project parcel boundaries superimposed. 5 }j ,, k' a"ty V 9 b a t s° h 0 a I 1 cis Tit, 4 ,'Sv !N ` 1 4 a�� r110 GYP R ass �trup tii 8a f ies * ^6 t • ss y *°� `5, y,t , i$ C f" 17 i s P 0 y qtr VI r . .'! `{4 $ A "V rr C4pr _ 15% _ 9fa�, LO 0 �! Q' . v. b b , *st - -.'''' 4/v (1 9 ,) I,0 t La� y o-p , ,'._1� Prx ytgr 6+I I D I G E+ Or a �f O « r C Y P .Q QE s S r �c y't,7 O Wiz, pia'' ze { . I 0 O ;r 9 ' r 1 4 I 14,, „. k t.. L�h�, O / -.y pot, Ne av+ Cy/0rer4` C1 om, r ik 3 32 '�', 33 a 'toy Lt c f. rBS s ` �� ti+ ` �ScsuD a • u Figure 3. 1943 Copeland map of Township 48S, Range 27E, with project parcel superimposed. 0 1/2 1 2 Miles approx. 0 .8 1.6 3.2 Km.approx. 6 4.7-57 fY i 4 ad 4 .8O 4 1 pl 11, 6 p b - � _ k?,* j,•: 1, n 4.4e, \ L _s, — r '6 4 y1 s 0,`.� �� `M p 9 .h A 1,"t, • r Figure 4. 1953 black and white aerial photograph of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel. .... --- # 1/8 1/4 1/2 Mile approx. 0 .2 .4 .8 Km.approx 7 ' ,-,,,PN,,,;,"1W-;• ', •. ' ' • , . N't • dr. • , . ,,,p• • • I / VVVV ; 710141triOr ' Figure 5. 1991 color aerial orthophotograph of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel. INNIN16111■1 0 1/16 1/8 1/4M gprx 0 .1 2 .4 KIVIagroc 8 { )I! tie it • .I � r ;' ' :� is 1 , ` .Ilk 4 c F �y eii 1 4 4 �� .4. 7 — I 1 f yr H ' e 777] i 4464 . it °. r .r Figure 6. Map showing soil types found in the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel. 10-Oldsmar Fine Sand, limestone substratum 11 -Hallandale fine sand 18-Riviera fine sand, limestone substratum 21 -Boca fine sand 99-Hallandale and Boca fine sands SOURCE:USDA WEB SOIL SURVEY 9 r .r' ' , 4 ff: A. f 'C4 Ti A A / ` x 4. Figure 7. Shovel testing in a newly emerging cabbage palm hammock. - ; i ;y, li ;t "- v- • tnt .-. y -.,..,tom._ 1 _ a 41..„ f t. S..- .3 JT 1 Figure 8. Road trail crossing an oak ridge. 10 I PREVIOUS RESEARCH Southwest Florida has been a focus of archaeological investigations since the 1880s, although much of the early work was directed toward the recovery of museum quality artifacts rather than understanding cultural processes. Griffin (1988:48-50) discussed some of the very early references to archaeological sites in South Florida. He noted that these early reports were mostly casual observations, and few appear to refer to southwest Florida,but rather refer to the southeast and Key West areas. Kenworthy's (1883) informal report on shell mounds and ancient canals was one of the first reports on southwest Florida archaeological sites. At about the same time as Kenworthy's investigations, Simons (1884) gave a narrative account of some of the very large coastal shell middens, and Douglass (1885) provided further information about prehistoric canals (although he did not accept that they were prehistoric). One account described a canal near Gordon's Pass that is probably the Naples Canal (8CR59), and another further north may be the Pineland Canal. Douglass' diaries record excavations of a post-contact era site (8CR41) on Horrs Island, as evidenced by the presence of European artifacts (Griffm, 1988:50-51). Douglass visited Lostman's River and other areas in the Ten Thousand Island area including Horrs Island(1890). In 1895 Durnford reported that cordage and other artifacts were recovered from a mangrove muck pond on Marco Island (8CR49). The material was shown to Cushing, who mounted a major project to recover more material from the site. Cushing (1897) reported recovering wood and other perishable artifacts from the muck pond on Marco Island,adjacent to a large shell works and midden village site. Publication of illustrations of the spectacular finds generated a great deal of subsequent interest. Wells M. Sawyer,a young artist accompanying the expedition, produced an excellent and presumably accurate contour map for the entire Key Marco Shell Midden. This map is valuable to present-day efforts in understanding many of the now obliterated features and interpreting(reconstructing)the"architecture"of the shell midden. Widmer(1983)notes that Cushing also focused attention on the nonagricultural chiefdom level of social organization supported by the rich estuary and marine resources, although his anthropological observations have remained overshadowed by the wealth of artifacts. Moore (1900, 1905, 1907) investigated a number of sites along the Collier/Lee County coast, apparently attempting to find material comparable to Cushing's finds. Although Moore provided information about site locations and general contents, most of his work was extremely crude and uncontrolled, by both contemporary archaeological standards, and by modem standards. The first attempt to systematically survey and investigate archaeological sites was initiated by Ales Hrdlicka, who visited a number of sites along the coast and tidal mangrove estuaries in 1918, focusing on the Ten Thousand Island region (Hrdlicka 1922). Hrdlicka noted that southwest Florida was a distinct region within south Florida and made an attempt to type sites by function. 11 Matthew Stirling's (1931, 1933)excavation of a burial mound on Horrs Island represents one of the first controlled excavations in Collier/Lee Counties (although he attempted stratigraphic control, Cushing had little success in his wet site excavation). The site was named the Blue Hill Mound,but it is not recorded under that name in the FMSF(either as a primary or secondary name), so it is unclear exactly which site he excavated, although it was probably site 8CR41 (McMichaels, 1982). These reports by Stirling are preliminary, and apparently neither a final report nor a skeletal analysis has been published. - John M. Goggin was the first to define a south Florida cultural area (Glades Area), and describe south Florida ceramics (Glades ware), establishing a basis for later archaeological work. He published an analysis of the ceramic sequence in south Florida (Goggin, 1939, 1940). In later reports (Goggin, 1947, 1949a, 1949b), he formulated a basic framework of cultural areas and chronologies that is still current (although modifications with additional data have been made, see further discussion below). Goggin (1949b) summarized much of this information in an unpublished manuscript, which Griffin(1988)thoroughly described. In passing, one unfortunate aspect of Goggin's work was a dependence on informant information for location of sites (especially interior sites) and he had a real concern that existing sites would be looted. This concern resulted in his either deliberately or incidentally reporting vague locational data for many sites. Some of these sites have never been satisfactorily relocated,although a few have undoubtedly been re-recorded by Amok later investigators. It is rumored that Goggin had a"gentleman's agreement"with many of the other leading practicing Florida archaeologists of the time that the South Florida area was his exclusive province to investigate. If this rumor is correct, it might explain the neglect shown the southwest Florida area in the archaeological arena from the end of World War II to Goggin's death in 1964. For several decades, much of the subsequent archaeological investigations in the region took place in the Cape Haze, Charlotte Harbor and Pine Island areas. Arlene Fradkin and other investigators from the University of Florida began an ongoing involvement with the Pine Island Sound/Sanibel Island area in the 1970s. Her first investigation was at the Wightman site on northern Sanibel Island(Fradkin 1976). In 1983, Marquardt began a series of investigations at Josslyn Key, Useppa Island, Pineland, Buck Key, Galt Island in Lee County, and at Big Mound Key in Charlotte County (Marquardt 1984, 1987, 1988, 1992). Marquardt and Russo have investigated Horrs Island in Collier County. A number of the large shell midden sites they excavated appear to be late Archaic,where they documented a more elaborate social organization at and larger sedentary or semi-sedentary population sizes than previously known for that period(Russo, 1990,and pers.comm.). 12 Most of the recent studies focused on the coastal sites,as have subsequent summaries and discussions. Recent work on the interior has made significant advances in documenting the extent of inland sites,especially in the Big Cypress and Everglades parks (Ehrenhard et al., 1978, 1979; Ehrenhard and Taylor 1980; Ehrenhard et al., 1980; Taylor and Komara 1983; Taylor, 1984, 1985). Griffin's (1988) synthesis of the Everglades Park data is the defining work on south Florida archaeology to date. Athens (1983) summarized some of the results of the Big Cypress survey. Beriault and colleagues (1981) reported on salvage excavations at Bay West Nursery (8CR200). Their description of the site includes a well known but rare and infrequently documented Early and Middle Archaic use of ponds for cemeteries. In the last two decades the pressure of development as well as a recognized need for preservation or mitigation of prehistoric sites has led to a number of reports by cultural resource management consultants. While most of these reports are limited in scope due to restriction to a small tract of land, many have produced useful summaries of regional archaeology, as well as insightful analysis of the relationship between site types and location and ecotypes(Almy and Deming 1982, 1986a, 1986b, 1986c, 1987,Austin 1987, Carr and Allerton 1988a, 1988b, Deming and Almy 1987, 1988, Fay and Carr 1990, Fuhrmeister et al. 1990, Martinez 1977,Miller and Fryman 1978, Swift and Carr 1989). Arthur W. Lee, John Beriault and others in the Southwest Florida Archaeological Society (SWFAS) have recorded and investigated a large number of archaeological sites in Collier and Lee Counties. It is an ongoing effort of the Society to publish and disseminate reports (Lee et al., 1993, 1997, 1998; Beriault, 1973, 1982, 1986, 1987; Beriault and Strader, 1984). Many of these reports deal with small interior seasonal sites. In addition, Beriault has provided several unpublished manuscripts regarding site types and archaeological areas(Beriault 1982, 1987). Most recently,archaeological investigation has been done in the area of the subject parcel by AHC at the Piper's Grove Parcel (now called Twin Eagles) to the immediate north (Carr et. Al. 1994), to the west between Moulder and Rivers Roads on the 20-acre Hunt Parcel (Beriault 1998) and on the four-square mile SR 846 Parcel (Beriault 2001). In 2002 AHC investigators conducted a Phase I investigation of a 500-acre area adjoining the present subject parcel to the north and east at the Immokalee Road South Parcel. Ten archaeological sites were assessed (Beriault et al. 2006). All of these projects resulted in the discovery of archaeological sites, reinforcing that the general area has a high concentration of archaeological features and sites. LITERATURE REVIEW A search was requested on 3/27/13 with the Florida Division of Historic Resources for relevant archives and literature associated with the project area. This included, but was not limited to, site forms from the Master Site File in Tallahassee concerning previously recorded archaeological sites within and immediately adjacent to the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel and reports for cultural resource investigations conducted within one mile of 13 the project parcel(Table 1). Table 1. Literature Review Summary Previously Recorded Sites: Within Project Parcel 0 Within One Mile of Survey Parcel 11 Previous Investigations: In Project Area 0 Within One Mile of Project Parcel 1 A review of Florida site files resulted in determining that no previously recorded archaeological sites occur within the project parcel. A total of eleven previously recorded archaeological sites occur within one mile of the project parcel. Table 2. Previously Recorded Sites Summary' In Survey Outside of Site No. Site Type References Parcel Parcel Site Fom►on File, Little Rowdy Swamp Division of Historic 8CR00827 Midden Midden Resources, X Tallahassee, Florida Beriault, A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00830 Twinberry Midden Immokalee Road X South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 Beriault A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00831 Colyott Midden/Mound Immokalee Road X South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 Beriault A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00832 Centipede Midden lmmokalee Road X South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 • Beriault A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00833 Camphorwood Grove Midden Immokalee Road X South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 Beriault, A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00834 Psychotria Midden/Campsite lmmokalee Road X South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 14 Beriault, A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00835 Coppice Interior Midden lmmokalee Road South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 Beriault, A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00836 Great Circles Earthworks Immokalee Road South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 Beriault, A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR00837 Serenoa Mound Sand Mound lmmokalee Road South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 Beriault, A Phase I Archaeological Goodwin Site(Northern Assessment of the 8CR00841 Component) Midden lmmokalee Road South Parcel, Collier County, Florida,2006 Beriault, A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 8CR01097 East Midden Midden lmmokalee Road South Parcel, Collier County, _ Florida,2006 _ Note: 'Based on sites within or adjacent to the project parcel. A review of the state report files conducted in the same area indicated one cultural resource assessment previously conducted within one mile of the project parcel (Table 3). Table 3. Previous Cultural Resource Assessments' No Survey Date Author Title In Parcel Out cof - A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the 17294 2006 Beriault,John G.,et al. lmmokalee Road South Parcel, Collier County, X Florida Note: 'Based on sites within one mile of the project parcel 15 •••..--..1,„...0.• - ._-- - 1- 1 / / j--- :-- ;,,••• ' , . ," " I \ , / / , ! ,"•---.....„.1.- / • ' ' 1 •t: -1 -4:•-:: ' '---1 ' \ )\--- -\ - .:•-7.5. '- `,.- / / c" - ' / -' / 't• t .. ' -- 41-7--- — -....:....-. - - .-'. ,' ,... -' \-- -, !-- -::- -:r '-) —../:V' .i. 1.,.. . .. -$.-* -.- , ...-,.-------1 - ,. . -..-!-v 1 _ . f)--1-,-,/ . . i ----%';'2; ":"•,-::::-;./1.,- -;.. - : 4 '' 1 . / _N. ' P:elit161':'1 4.i'-' - • 1- -\l'i 14- -ci•-•',.., ..."4,, `•-•"" '''..".‘44,...115.4r1''..:(-"-.. ' '''-" 1 ',..........■••••••••..... .4•47",AVP;' 7...%"!.■.:6: ..'" :.. "'■', ,, ;i.l,....;,,,...-,:,. ': .".. . -+••■ •••••"""..". o T---- 7 - _-_. - --_- i'l:::::--.',. • 8CFt830 0 ' '' , - • ■ =1'4. _ t "" • li 0 8C11.1097• • .. . ... - . ‘,..., .. - ,..■',12F,6106' R83 ks.,3 eV'8011833 '• ' ,,,1 . . i . ."- -7, ... { ' ": • 8CR841 3Q t-1 -C". • -I'' -1 .. . . , , .,, ,., PRIIII0 1 . , ..t.,. • 1., -.,-- It .. I.- ._,:i.:-., ..-.T. :cRe137 lr. • , 1 ,„ , , . ,• .1. - I.- 1 I - L.:-........; . 1 1 ..-71 ;' t` '-' - ' .. „,_ ._....- I . : ' • _ _ _ .... . • ' ,..... .. • : I• . 1. . . , —•_........._ -- i 1 -• I • #. . ' . . : •• • . • y . . . - - .. _ _ ... • i I • 1 I • ! . • _ 4.. . —.. . —..-_—.. ' ' • a •: • . .,.. 2 • — • 1. • : • 6 f . , . . f •. , ' •I • ,I• 1 . 1 ' t , 1.3 ■••• --,- 1 • • ''.''''*" 1r.... .' t . ; I T- _.__...... I . • . .. . , I • . .•. .i ., .._ . . • . -• . . . • ! • , 1 . ., • . . , , - . _ . . . . - . . . I. 1 .•s •1 • . _ • Figure 9. USGS map of the Olde Florida Golf Club Parcel area showing all previously recorded sites within one mile of the project parcel. ■11 ...■•• + INI■ TOWNSHIP 48S,RANGE 27E,SECTION 31 0 1/4 112 1 Mile approx. USGS Map: CORKSCREW SW,REV 1987 0 .4 .8 1.6 Km.approx. 16 CULTURAL SUMMARY Stirling was the first to distinguish the indigenous prehistoric cultures of southern Florida in 1936 by defining a Glades cultural area, including all of south Florida (Carr et al. 1994b:9; Milanich, 1994.5-6). Griffin (1988)pointed out that this was not formulated as a strict cultural area,but it was rather a geographic region with some common cultural traits. Kroeber (1939), in a review of North American prehistory, utilized a slightly different term,the"South Florida Area,basing his definition on both environmental and cultural factos.Subsequently Goggin delineated more particular boundaries for southern Florida and divided the region into three sub-areas: "Okeechobee" around Lake Okeechobee, "Tekesta" for southeast Florida and the Florida Keys, and "Calusa" for Southwest Horida(Carr et al. 1994b:10; Goggin 1947:114-127). Following Goggin's study,subsequent reseasthes have refined or altered the cultural distinctions attributed to southern Florida's prehistoric populations. There has been criticism that Goggin's nannes and definitions were based on historic accounts of the main(proto)historic groups found in the respective regions and not on the archaeobgical evidence of spatial, temporal,and cultural differences (Seas 1%6; Griffin, 1974; Carr and Beriault 1984; Griffin, 1988). Griffin, in particular,questioned the distinctions.He believed that South Florida cultures varied only by local environmental conditions and ceramic exchange rates. Giffin believed the inhabitants of prehistoric southern Fbrida were mainly dwelling on the coast and that the interior was nearly uninhabited and under- utilized. Griffin designated the entire southern Florida region as the "Grcum-Glades" area(Eck 1997:5;Griffin 1974:342-346).This new designation for the area was furthered by a widely circulated book on Florida archaeology by Milanich and Fairbanks (1980). Griffin later(1988) retreated to some extent from his earlier position as further research (particularly by Ehie shard,Carr,Komara,and Taylor in the Big Cypress and Carr in the eastern Everglades in the 1970s and 1980s)showed abundant sites (and concomitant use and habitation)in the interior and Everglades. Carr and Beriault, in particular,have taken issue with the concept of a Cucum-Glades region. Carr's research in the Big Cypress and Everglades and his subsequent analysis demonstrating variation of key cultural markers (particularly in decorated ceramics) formed the basis for this contention. There is abundant evidence for cultural (and probably political or tribal) divesity in the various areas of south Florida. Carr and Beriault particularly noted and defined differences between the lower southwest Florida coast,which they termed the `Ten Thousand Island" region,and the area to the north, which they called the "Caloosahatchee" region.This latter area they believed to be the seat of the historic Calusa chiefdonship, although previous (and some subsequent) researches have called the entire southwest Florida from Cape Sable to the Cape Haze peninsula(and beyond)in Charlotte County"Calusa." Griffin, in his definitive 1988 synthesis on Everglades archaeology, attempted to reconcile and refine some of the conflict in the definition of south Florida prehistoric and historic culture areas.As stated by Carr and colleagues (19941)), "the ssue...appeas in part to be one of trying to determine the significance of regional and temporal variation, 17 rather than whether these differences are real." There is evidence that changes through time in regional political affiliations or realties makes any model not addressing this complex issue two-dimensional.The Calusa hegemony that was in place by the time of the arrival of Europeans may have begun as early as 800 AD in the Ten Thousand Island "district" or area (Griffin 1988:321; Carr et al. 1994b:12). There is currently ongoing research to further refine present thought as to cultural affiliations n south Florida. It would seem only a matter of time before new directions and emphases provide a more accurate summation of south Florida cultural affinities. Using the present models,the coastal zones of Collier County and southern Lee County contain three distinct culture areas.Indian Hill on Marco Island lies thirty riles from the projected interface by Carr and Beriault (1984) of the Caloosahatthee area (called the "the `heartland'of the Calusa," Carr et al. 1994b:12)to the north,and the Ten Thousand Islands area to the south.At a yet undefined point to the east lies the Okeechobee cultural area,but the boundary,if it is a definite,fixed one,is likely to occur in the vicinity of the Immokalee rise forty riles or more to the northeast of Indian Hill. Further work is in progress by Carr to address the issue of where the southwest boundaries of the Okeechobee culture area occur. TEMPORAL PERIODS In south Florida, the following periods and adaptations ale generally accepted. Part of this chionobgy involving the later or Formative period is called the Glades sequence in honor of Goggin, the greater part of whose work in defining the ceramic sequence or markers has withstood the test of time and subsequent criticism (Goggin 1939, 1947, 1949c). From Goggin's day to present, pottery variability in form, substance, and decoration has proven useful for providing time markers, at least during the archaeologically-brief (± 3500 year) period spanning the late Archaic and Formative periods that it was produced. Other artifact types and their variations have,to present, proven somewhat less reliable as absolute indicants of prehistoric age. Radiocarbon dating, a phenomena of the last 30-plus yeas, provides, within the standard deviation expressed in plus-or--minus years BP (before present), a relatively absolute date for a given sample and provides a yardstick to measure traits or distinctions in piovenienced artifacts. Determining and adequately defining what traits we can discern against this absolute is part of the ongoing function of the regional archaeological effort. The following information is generalized and abbreviated. The dates are approximate; transitions between periods are in reality more gradual that the manner they are expressed for convenience. PALEO PERIOD(14,000- 8,500 BP) During the Paleo Period,Native Americans began moving into the southeastern portion of North America into Florida.Most evidence of their presence in Florida can be reliably dated to about 10,000 BP. There are no known Paleoindian sites in Collier County. Several are documented from elsewhere it south Florida,including Warm Mineral Springs and Little Salt Springs in 18 Sarasota County(Cockrell and Murphy 1978; Clausen and Gifford 1975),Harney Flats in Hillsborough County (Daniel and Wisenbaker, 1987) and the Cutler Fossil Site in Dade County(Carr 1986). During this period, the terminal Wisconsian ice age, the climate was probably less extreme, with cooler summers and warmer winters. The climate was also drier, and sea levels were lower(Carbone 1983;Can 1986;Griffin 1988). One reason that possible Paleo period sites have not been discovered in Collier and Lee Counties is that the shoreline may have been as much as 100 miles further west due to lower sea levels. Drier conditions may have made the interior very inhospitable, and the shallow estuarine and littoral sites that existed were flooded by post-ice age Holocene sea rises. Any possible interior sites from the Paleo Period may be unrecognizable due to lack of diagnostic artifacts, low population density, and few permanent camps. These and other factors may help explain the absence to date of identifiable Paleo period sites in Collier and Lee Counties. ARCHAIC PERIOD (8,500 - 2,500 BP) The Archaic period reflects a post-Pleistocene shift in adaptation marked by an increase in the seasonal exploitation of a broad spectrum of food resources, a more restricted use of territory due to regional specialization, and more semi-sedentary habitation sites. No ceramics are known until the Late Archaic. During the Archaic, regional specializations became more marked, not only with material culture but also with distinct local utilization of local plant and animal resources. As mentioned above, there is, as yet, no firm evidence of human presence in southwest Florida during the Paleo period. This apparently is also true for the Early Archaic (8500- 7000BP), as there is evidence of an environment too arid to support scrub oak, and the presence of shifting wind formed dunes (Watts 1975; Widmer 1983). No early Archaic sites are known from southwest Florida(Allerton and Can 1988:14). By about 6500 BP mesic conditions began to spread, although localized xeric conditions continued (and still exist in some areas) through south Florida. Middle Archaic sites dating from this time are rare, although the Bay West Nursery site (8CR200) in Collier County and the Ryder Pond site (8LL1850) in Lee County near Bonita Springs provide evidence of occupation, as do several sites in southeast Florida. The Bay West site is a Middle Archaic cypress pond cemetery, associated with a lithic scatter. The Ryder Pond site is a similar mortuary pond site surrounded by pine flatwoods (Carr and Heinz 1996). Beriault has also recorded several aceramic shell scatters in coastal sand hills (paleo dunes), some of which may date to the Middle Archaic. Griffin (1988) summarizes evidence indicating that despite the rise of available surface water, brackish estuaries and other major modem landscape features had not formed, and population(or repopulation) was still sparse. 19 During the Archaic period sea levels began to rise at a fairly rapid late,estimated at 8.3 cm. per 100 years 6000-3000 BP, and 35 cm per 100 yeas afterwards (Scholl et al. 1969),although whether sea levels were steadily rising or oscillating is still unclear(see Griffin 1988; Allerton and Can 1990 for recent reviews of the literature). Data is somewhat difficult to sort out as sea level rise was accompanied by both shore regression and transgression in places.As conditions became wetter (and warner) in the interior, cypress swamps and hardwood sub tropical forests established themselves by about 5000 BP(Carbone 1983,Delcourt and Delcourt 1981). By late Middle or early late Archaic times (4000 years BP)there wee significant shell mounds and middens on Horrs Island,Marco Island,and elsewhere in the coastal regions, suggesting that the estuary system had been established and was being utilized to provide the subsistence basis for denser populations and semi-sedentary settlements (Morrell 1969; Cockrell 1970). At Useppa Island in Lee County, excavations have provided radiocarbon dates from pre-ceramic shell niddens ranging between roughly 4900 BP and 5600 BP, suggesting that the Middle Archaic as well as Late Archaic periods saw a growing dependence on shellfish resources (Milanich et al. 1984). There are aceramic coastal sand hill and interior wetland sites as well,but these have not been demonstrated to be Archaic despite some investigators equating aceramic with preceranic. Radiocarbon dates for these sites would clarify this point. Allerton and Carr(1988) noted that a number of stratified sites in the wet mangrove and marsh areas of the Everglades,as well as on Hors Island,contain Archaic preceramic horizons, although it is unclear if aceramic was equated with preceramic. Additional supporting evidence of interior use by Archaic peoples will provide a new dimension to the archaeological understanding of Archaic resource utilization.Allerton and Carr point out that if the wet tree islands wee initially used by Archaic people,then at least some of the hardwood hammocks in swamp environments were raised in elevation (with subsequent changes in vegetation) due to human activities. Post-Archaic people extensively utilized these hammocks and continued to advance their development as distinct geomorphic features.This is obviously an area where additional archaeobgical investigations have a potential to contribute to understanding the interaction of geomorphic and cultural evolution in southwest Florida. Toward the end of the Archaic fiber-tempered pottery appears in southwest Florida,often used as a marker of the Orange Phase,commencing at about 4000 BP,either coincident with or soon after the development of the extensive shell middens. The Late Archaic Orange Phase subsistence strategy is characterized by intensive use of shellfish and marine resources, as well as being marked by an accelerated trend toward regional specializations. A number of the large shell n iddens on Marco Island (Cbclrell 1970), Hons Island (Russo nd.),Cape Haze (Bullen and Bullen 1956),and elsewhere date from this period or earlier, as they contain fiber-tempered ceramics, although there are known aceranic (preceranic?) levels below the Orange Phase deposits that may date to the Middle Archaic. These shell middens are usually capped by deposits from later occupations as well. 20 FORMATIVE STAGE OR GLADES PERIODS (2500 BP -500 BP) The Formative or (lades adaptation,based on hunting, fishing, and the harvesting of shellfish and plants, was similar to the Archaic, but was characterized by increasing specializations in gathering strategies and tool-making. Earlier writers have typed this hunter-gatherer society as primitive or `low-level" (Kroeber 1939). However, there is certainly evidence from the specialization of took, from the beautifully-executed wood carvings from Key Marco in Collier County and those from Fort Center near Lake Okeechobee (Cushing 1897; Sears 1982), and from the historic accounts of the Cabsa hegemony,that the south Florida area had an advanced culture that Goggin (1964) has called a"stratified non-agrarian society." The preceding late Archaic late Orange phase(also known as the transitional phase)was marked by changes n pottery,and terminated with the relatively rapid replacement of fiber-tempered pottery with sand-tempered,limestone-tempered,and chalky"temperless" pottery. It was also characterized by changes in ceramic style and often by reduction in the size of stone projectile pobts. The Formative Stage (beginning about 2500 BP) is divided in south Florida into the Glades Periods sequence. Subsistence adaptations marked by a narrowing spectrum of resource use, as well as continued trends toward regional diversity and ecobgical specializations, marked in part by the proliferation of inland resource extraction encampments. Formative Period cultural evolution eventually led to increased political sophistication, perhaps initially of modest dimensions, but culminating in broad regional political alliances and regulation of materials and goods (i.e. resources) between the coast and inland areas (Milanich and Fairbanks 1980). By protohstoric and contact times the Calusa were the dominant trrbal group, gaining broad political influence and at least partial control over much of south Florida as far north as central Brevard County. Historically, the main Calusa village has been regarded as "Cabs" on Mound Key in Estero Bay in Lee County, although 50 to 70 large villages were under direct Calusa control by contact times (Griffin,1988). During the Formative Periods,village sites grew to the proportions of large multi-use complexes,particularly abng the coast and barrier islands of southwest Florida.Some of the projectedntra-site functions of the elements of these complex shellworks were as temples, canals, causeways, temple and platform mounds, courtyards and wateroourts. Current research involving the excavating of large contiguous areas of these shell mound complexes is beginning to establish demonstrable uses for the features of these large sites,upon which heretofore were merely speculated(Widmer 1996). Tidal estuary rivers and inland hammocks abng deep water sloughs, marshes, and permanent ponds were seasonally visited for extraction of natural resources,and are now marked by small to relatively large black dirt middens,some of which may have been semi-permanent hamlets.The pine and cypress flatwoods appear to have supported few 21 sites, although areas around Lake Trafford and other rich interior areas developed substantial sites, including sand mounds, and may be more similar to the Okeechobee cultural area than to the coastal cultures. In 1992,Dickel and Can excavated a Deptford Period burial mound(the Oak Knoll Site) in the Bonita Bay Tract north of the Imperial River. Exotic trade items and seventy or more human burials were among the material findings. The resulting conclusions and subsequent surveying and testing of the Bonita Bay Shell works (8IL717) suggest social stratification and complexity may extend further back into the past than the Formative period(Dickel and Our 1992). Coastal sites (shell middens)reflect a predominate dependence on fish and shellfish,wild plant foods and products,and larger inland game.The inland sites show a greater reliance on interior resources, including large, medium and small mammals, turtle, small freshwater fish,alligator,snake,frogs,and,sometimes,freshwater shellfish.Interior and coastal resource exchange can be documented by the consistent finds of moderate amounts of marine shell in many interior middens,as well as interior resources in coastal hidden The Formative Stage (with a nod to Goggin)has been often termed the Glades cultural tradition. Much of this "tradition" is focused on decorated ceramics,the minority in the archaeological record, although the majority of recovered (rim) sherds are plainware. However, despite this, pottery (and its decorations) is usually utilized as the major temporal markers)for fitting sites into a temporal framework. Changes in pottery do not Amok represent mere changes in artistic motifs, but reflect inter- and intea-regional trade contacts and outside cultural influences (possibly through exogamy, shifting of populations, and even the through evolution of a culture through tine). Whatever the influences,the Glades tradition is continuous from post-Archaic tines to contact times. Despite the fact that exogamy is likely to have been practiced,traders or other specialists probably moved between major cultural areas in small numbers, and genetic flow probably accompanied cultural exchange,although perhaps not on the sane scale.This may have increased in later times due to use of traditional obligations of kinship and intermarriage to stabilize alliances that were not codified into a formal legal system. The following table has been modified from several sources, but it is predominantly based on Milanich and Fairbanks (1980), Crain (1988),and Allerton and Carr(1990). Dates have been rounded somewhat and translated to Before Present (BP). There are some differences of opinion in the dates,particularly about the timing of the Glades Ia and lb division. Table 1:Glades Ct,itural Sequence, Glades Ia(2500 BP- 1500 BP) Appearance of sand tempered plain pottery, but little else to mark a difference and the preceding 22 Late Archaic. Sand tempered plain remains a predominate type throughout the Glades sequence. (lades lb(1500 BP- 1250 BP) Appearance of decorated sand tempered ceramic (Ft.Drum Incised,R.Drum Punctated,Cane Patch Incised, Tamer River Punctate), plainware common. Pottery rim grooving and incision decorations become widespread. Glades Ha(1250 BP- 1100 BP) Appearance of Key largo Incised,Sanibel Incised, Miani Incised, and plainware is common. Distinction between ceramics of southeast and southwest Florida becomes apparent. Ten Thousand Island area distinct from Caloosahatchee area. Fist round construction- increased social stratification? l?bpulation size may have approximated that at contact. Glades fib(1100- 1000 BP) Appearance of Matecumbe Incised; Key Largo Incised common on east coast, Gordon's Pass Incised common on the west, and plainware common throughout. Glades IIc(1000 BP-800 BP) Appearance of Plantation Pinched, but few decorated wares with apreponderance of plainware (there is some evidence of population reduction- perhaps due to a cataclysmic event). Non-local pottery (e.g. St. Johns Plain and Check Stamped, Belle Glade Plain)appears. Glades Dia(800-600 BP) Appearance of Surfside Incised, increasing quantities of St. Johns pottery (especially on East Coast),and Belle Glade pottery. Glades HD(600 BP-500 BP) Glades Tooled rims appear (rare on West °bast), zoned punctate designs, but general decline in incised decoration.Belle Glade ceramics common on west coast. St. Johns ware peseta but rare on West Coast,column on East Coast. Glades Mc(500 BP-300 BP) Continuation of lib ceramics, with pronounced flaring of rims and embossing on Glades Tooled ceramics. Mound burial construction less column with intrusive burials into existing mounds, appearance of European goods,plainware common. 23 HISTORICAL PERIOD By European contact times (the first half of the 16th century), the southwest coast of Florida was maintaining a vigorous,possibly expanding political chiefdom with a broad network of alliances, as well as a rich and ancient cultural tradition without an agricultural base. However, direct conflict with Europeans and, more imortantly, exposure to European diseases led to the rapid decline of the Cahisa.By the mid 1700s their numbers had greatly diminished.The remnants of this once-powerful tribe may have left south Florida in the 1760s with the Spanish for relocation in alba.Others may have become indistinguishable from Spanish Cuban fishermen who worked the great fishing "ranchos" in the Pine Island Sound region catching and salting fish for export to Cuba. Other groups of Native Americans may have fused with the Creek-derived Senminoles In the late 17003,members of the Creek tribe were forced into Florida from Georgia and Alabama. They were later called Seminoles, possibly derived from the Spanish term "cimnarones." Pressures from colonial (and later) white encroachment on their traditional territories forced them into the Big Cypress and Everglades area by the 1830s. By this time, most of the cultural identity of pre-contact times had been lost, although some of the Chlusa subsistence strategies may have been partly adopted by Seminoles.A number of Seminole period sites have been documented on earlier(jades maddens.This coincidence may in part reflect the paucity of high land in the interior(Ehrenhard et al. 1978, 1979, 1980; Ebrenhard and Taylor 1980; Taylor and Komara 1983; Taylor 1984, 1985). Older madden sites (particularly those called "black dirt" middens) can be rich agriculturally as well as archaeobgically, making these foci for historic Seminole gardens and fruit groves. Seminole periods in south Florida are divided into I (1820-1860),II(1860-1900) and III (1900-1940) (Ehrenhard et al. 1978). Post-1940 Seminole rams are designated "Late Seminole" in some reports.These designations reflect the different stages of Seminole migration into south Florida, Seminole displacement and active conflict with the expanding American culture, and the eventual refuge by Seminole remnants in Big Cypress and Everglades regions. Military records,and,in particular,seveial sketch maps by military personnel done in the 1830s and 1840s and the Ives military map of South Florida (1856) shows evidence of investigations at and near"Malco Inlet; "Casimba," "Good Land,"and"Cape Romans." SEMINOLE WARS IN THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA AREA The advent of the Second and Third Seminole Wars (1834-38, 1855-58) disrupted the peaceful settlement of the Southwest Florida region. There were several forts, "temporary"and permanent,established along the Caloosahatchee River during this time. Fort Dulaney was established at Punta Rassa near the mouth of the Cabosahatchee in 1837 and was occupied intermittently through 1841,and again in 1855. After a hurricane destroyed R.Dulaney in 1841,Fort Harvie was established upriver.The name of this fort was changed in 1850 by its commander General Twiggs to honor his new son-h-law, Col. Abraham Myers. Fort Myers was thus created, and became the chief fort of the region. 24 From this central administrative point, a line of forts was established up the Caloosahatchee River.They were: Fort Denaud,Fort Adams,Fort Thompson,and Fort Center on Fs heating Creek leading into Lake Okeechobee. Other forts and"temporary depots" were established south into the Big Cypress Swamp such as Fort Simon Drum, Temporary Depot Number One,Fort thane,Fort Simmons,Fort Keis,Fort Foster,Fort Shackleford,and others. A number of military expeditions were sent south along the coast during the Second and Third Seminole Wars with the objectives of interdicting trade in guns and ammunition between the Seminoles and the Spanish-Cuban fishing contnunity, and hunting and capturing Indians. General Thomas Lawson, who had just been appointed Surgeon General of the United States,commanded one of the early notable expeditions.Lawson's expedition left Fort Haivie (Fort Myers) in February 1838. Elements of Lawson's command explored the area in and around the Caxarn bas Point area, discovering two abandoned Indian villages n the Blackwater River/Palm Bay area. Other expeditions bivouacked at Cape Romano and Caxanthas Point. Colonel Rogers, of the ill-fated Parkhill expedition,wrote several dispatches from Cape Romano in the Caxambas area in 1858, describing the ambush of Captain Park hill's party at the headwaters of Turner River.The Collier County Museum is the repository for a collection of military artifacts purportedly found by a local collector near Indian Hill in the early 1960s.This material may have originated with one of the various military expeditions stopping at Caxambas Point. The present survey did not locate any Seminole period sites,although military records, and in particular several sketch imps by military personnel done in the 1830s and 1840s and the Ives military imp of South Florida(1856) indicate various Seminole sites such as "Fort Doane","Fort Keais","Billy's Town"and "Cholalapalka"in the general area. MODERN AREA HISTORY By the 1890s white settlers and homesteaders such as the Whiddens, Canolls, Smiths, and Kiridands had hunted, settled or ranched cattle in the area of Curry Island immediately south of Bird Rookery Slough and Corkscrew Swamp.These early settles famed the Henderson Creek area and hunted northward into Rattlesnake Hammock.The advent of the Immokalee Road (CR846) in the late 1950s further opened access to the area,and a sizable percentage of the region was cleared for large commercial farming operations. The completion of the Atlantic Coastline Railway by 1928 also enabled logging of pine and cypress in the Big Corkscrew Island/Corkscrew Swamp area by the late 1940s as a series of logging trams allowed access by narrow-gauge logging locomotives into the surrounding country. By the late 1940s Bill and Lester Piper of Bonita Springs maintained a sizable ranching operation north of the Iminokalee Road with a corral and chutes for loading cattle at a hammock called the Mule Pens. By the late 1960s several sections south of the Immokalee Road were opened for purchase to individual landholders,generally of 5 and 10-acre parcels.North-south roads constructed south from the Immokalee Road include 25 Richards,Knape,Moulder,Rivets and Rock Roads. Many of the residents utilized early woods trails and old bgging tram roads for access south into the northem-central blocks of Golden Gate Estates. In 1992 the Olde Florida Golf Club,a 300-acre 18-hole golf course,was built after access into the area was created by the construction of the Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR862). Many large planned unit devebpments such as Piper's Glove (Twin Eagles),the Bonita Bay Country club,the Quany,and others were constructed north of Imtnokalee Road by the late 1990s. The Inmokalee Road/Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension area today is experiencing increasing density of devebpment with condominium communities and upscale single family home construction being created along the CR 951 (Collier Boulevard) corridor. 26 METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting fieldwork in the project parcel, relevant archives and literature were reviewed. This included, but was not limited to, studying previous archaeological reports for sites in Collier County, reviewing information from the Master Site File in Tallahassee concerning nearby sites, and examining USGS maps of the project area. Also,black and white as well as color aerial photographs of the project area, which could aid in revealing anthropogenic changes to the topography and floral communities, were interpreted. RESEARCH DESIGN The principal project goal was to locate and assess all historical or archaeological sites on the subject parcel. This cultural resource survey incorporated the use of certain predictive models. These models are based on topographic and vegetative attributes that are associated with prehistoric and historic sites in interior Collier County. These models postulate that live oak, tropical hardwood and cabbage palm hammocks in close proximity to drainage sloughs and marshes are medium to high probability targets for archaeological sites. The elevational information on the USGS quadrangle map for the area also was used. It was determined that the project parcel had a low to medium probability of associated archaeological sites. FIELDWORK All parts of the parcel were assessed by pedestrian survey. Areas previously identified on aerial photographs were ground truthed, including 12 areas identified from a review of vintage and modem aerial photographs. All of these identified areas were assigned target numbers and then subjected to ground truthing to determine their probability for containing archaeological or historic sites: low,medium,or high. All higher probability and some selected lower probability areas were shovel tested, including small and lower elevation tree islands (Figure 7). The wetlands,much of which was inundated at the time of this assessment, was not shovel tested, but was subject to a pedestrian survey. A total of 70 judgmental shovel tests were dug across the project parcel. All shovel tests were 50-cm diameter holes excavated to 100 cm depth where possible. If a hole was positive for cultural deposits,additional shovel tests were dug at 10-meter intervals on the cardinal directions from the positive hole. This delineation method was used to determine the extent of any site. All dug sediments were screened through 'h"-mesh hardware cloth and all cultural materials were collected. 27 COLLECTIONS All collected material was placed in sealable plastic bags and transported to the AHC laboratory in Davie for conservation and analysis. These materials were assigned field specimen numbers. INFORMANTS The project biologist, Tom Trettis,was interviewed during the course of this assessment. He was not aware of any cultural resources or hardwood hammocks on the property. 28 1 I • \ ---.1 I I t 1 \ n --t tt1 o �° .,13" ur u %4 ' #3C) . 0 ` . I °; o o .. ,4t tl, I'11t 0 t — r Ili i 0. #13 1 : \ i. 1 •o ol„ #11e R - • • :ii 11 y V • .� � l...a ♦r Y 'Y \t' I S • ''r ?(3( Figure 10. 2011 color aerial orthophotograph of the Olde Florida Country Club parcel showing location of selected probability areas and shovel tests. o =SURFACE COLLECTION OF PREHISTORIC LITHIC MATERIAL IN PROBABILITYAREA#8 ® =NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST =HIGH PROBABILITY AREA =MEDIUM PROBABILITY AREA IlmiN =LOW PROBABILITY AREA 0 1/16 118 114 Re approL ......... 0 .1 .2 .4 Km.approx. 29 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS This reconnaissance cultural resource assessment of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel resulted in the documentation of one previously unrecorded prehistoric site: 8CR1305. This site is a sparse chert lithic scatter on a discrete area of high ground(Probability Area #8).Additional shovel tests in the immediate vicinity of the finds uncovered no additional cultural material. A total of 70 shovel tests were dug across the parcel all of which were negative for archaeological material. Two field specimens were collected from the surface. Both are non-local chert flakes: percussion and pressure flakes, the byproduct of prehistoric stone tool manufacture or retouching. Four shovel tests were dug at and within 10 meters of the specimens but all were negative for cultural material. This assessment resulted in the documentation of one previously unrecorded prehistoric site, 8CR1305, on the project parcel. The overall cultural material assemblage is of particular interest because of the uncommon presence of exotic lithic material—the closest known sources of chert being north of Charlotte/Sarasota counties. The likely chronological provenience for the material is the mid to late Archaic Period, predating circa 500 B.C. (2500+ years BP) and likely represents an activity area at higher Probability Area#8,which is a sandy ridge. The large size of the parcel and its various vegetative/topographic changes adjacent to marshes and sloughs afford the likelihood that scattered cultural material may occur elsewhere on the parcel. If such materials are encountered during development activities then the consultant archaeologist and the State's Division of Historic Resources should be notified. If human remains are found Florida Statute 872.05 will apply. It is recommended that an archaeologist conduct intermittent monitoring of ground- disturbing activities, particularly in the area of site 8CR1305 and its associated ridge, during development. If any archaeological materials or features are encountered they should be fully documented. 30 SUMMARY OF SITE Site Name: Oak Grove State Site Number: 8CR1305 Environmental Setting: Higher ground oak grove Location: Township 48S,Range 27E, Section 31 Site Type: Lithic scatter Site Function: Habitation?,resource extraction,tool manufacturing Description: The site is identified based on two pieces of chert lithic debitage material found in the north-central portion of a sandy ridge(Figure 10). The ridge is about 50 cm above the surrounding area. The two chert flakes were found where a prominent sandy woods trail crosses the high area. Bioturbation from off-road vehicles likely redeposited them from their original in situ location. The specimens were 4 meters apart. The chert is patinated white and likely is part of a lithic tool processing location. Chronology: Prehistoric: likely mid to late Archaic Collections: Two pieces of percussion and pressure flaked patinated chert debitage(FS-1) Previous Research: None Preservation Quality: Very Good Ownership: Private Significance: The site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places because of the sparse occurrence of lithic artifacts and lack of other cultural material. 31 NO r ., - ` a.11.1R Figure 11. Oak Grove site 8CR1305 looking north. . yam _" f� •"y a ". • m • tom -1 +q ^ 4 r ,if s . i Figure 12. Closeup of 8CR1305 and lithic flake. 32 0 REFERENCES CITED Almy,Marion M. 1993 A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of U.S.41 (SR 90)from CR31 to East of SR951, Collier County, Florida. Report #3465 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. 2000 A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of State Road 84 (Davis Boulevard) from Santa Barbara Boulevard to CR 951/Sr 951, Collier County, Florida. Report #5950 on file,Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Almy,MM and JG Deming 1982 Cultural Resources Survey of the Emerald Lakes Tract in Northwest Collier County,Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota FMSF#902. 1986a Archaeological Assessment Survey of Twelve Lakes,Collier County,Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 1986b Archaeological Assessment of Bretonne Park, Collier County, Florida Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 1986c Archaeological Assessment of City Gate Commercial Park, Collier County, Florida.Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 1987 Archaeological Assessment Survey of Designated Potions of the Woodlands in Collier County,Florida.Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. Athens,WP 1983 The Spatial Distribution of Glades Period Sites within the Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida. Masters thesis on file, Florida State University, Tallahassee,Florida. Beriault,JG 1973 A Preliminary Report on the Area Known as the Collier-Coral Ridge Tract, Southwest Florida. Unpublished Ms, on file at FMSF, Tallahassee and AHC, Miami. 1982 A Preliminary Report on Stratigraphic Excavations at Addison Key, Collier County,Florida.Unfinished MS. 1986 Report and Recommendations Concerning the Barron Collier Company Tract on Chokoloskee Island,Collier County,Florida,MS on file,AHC. 1987 Suggestions for a Collier County site Model, a report submitted to the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, December 15th, 1987. MS on file, AHC. 33 1998 An Archaeological Survey of the Standerfer Parcel, Lee County, Florida. AHC Technical Report #226. 1999 An Archaeological Survey of the Winding Cypress Property, Collier County, Florida.Report#7248 on file,Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Beriault,JG,RS Carr,J Stipp,R Johnson,and J Meeder 1981 The Archaeological Salvage of the Bay West Site, Collier County, Florida. In Florida Anthropologist 34(20):39-58. Beriault,JG and RS Carr 1998 An Archaeological Survey of the Winding Cypress Parcel, Collier County, FL. AHC Technical Report#221. Beriault,JG and C Strader 1984 A Preliminary Report on Stratigraphic Excavation on Chokoloskee Island, Florida. Southwest Florida Archaeological Society,MS on file,AHC. Beriault,John G. and Craig A. Weaver 2002 A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Toll-Rattlesnake Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #13377 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. Beriault,John G.;Joseph Mankowski,John Crump 2006 A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Immokalee Road Parcel, Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#755. Bullen,RP and AK Bullen 1956 Excavation on Cape Haze Peninsula, Florida. Contributions of the Florida State Museum. Social Sciences I, Gainesville,Florida. Carbone,VA 1983 Late Quaternary Environments in Florida and the Southeast. The Florida Anthropologist 36:3-17. Carr,RS 1981 Salvage Excavations at two prehistoric Cemeteries in Dade County, Florida. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Florida Academy of Sciences. Winter Park. 1986 Preliminary Report on Excavations at the Cutler Fossil Site (8DA2001) in Southern Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 39:231-232. 1989 An Archaeological and Historical Survey of Part of the Williamson Property, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Miami. FMSF 2458. 34 2002 "The Archaeology of Everglades Tree Islands" in Tree Islands of the Everglades. Edited by Fred H. Sklar and Arnold Van der Valk. Kluther Academic Publishers, 187-206. Carr,RS and D Allerton 1988a An Archaeological Survey of North Keewaydin Island, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy,Miami,Florida. 1988b An Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Goodland Marina Project Tract, Collier County, Florida. MS on file, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy,Miami, Florida. Carr,RS and JG Beriault 1984 Prehistoric Man In South Florida. In PJ Gleason (ed), Environments of South Florida:Present and Past IL Coral Gables:Miami Geological Society,FL.pp. 1-14. Carr,Robert S. and Richard Haiduven 1990 An Archaeological Assessment of the Arete Golf Course Property, Collier County, Florida. Report #2605 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. Carr,RS and K Heinz 1996 Archaeological Excavations at the Ryder Pond Site, 8LL1850, Lee County,FL. April, 1986. Carr,RS and W Steele 1993 An Archaeological Survey and Assessment of the Lely Resort Properties, Collier County,FL. AHC Technical Report#70. Carr,RS, W Steele and J Davis 1994a A Phase I Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Piper Tract, Collier County,Florida. April, 1994. 1994b A Phase II Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Piper Tract, Collier County,Florida. June, 1994. Clausen, C and J Gifford 1975 Florida spring confirmed as 10,000 year old early man site. The Florida Anthropologist 8(3),Part 2. Cockrell,WA 1970 Glades I and Pre-Glades Settlement and Subsistence Patterns on Marco Island (Collier County, Florida). M.A. thesis of file, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida. Cockrell,WA and L Murphy 1978 Pleistocene Man in Florida. Archaeology of Eastern North America Vol. 6. Newark,Delaware: Eastern States Archaeological Federation. 35 Cushing,FH 1897 Exploration of Ancient Key-Dwellers' Remains on the Gulf Coast of Florida. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia 35 (153): 1-329-448. Daniel,RI and M Wisenbaker 1987 Harney Flats. Baywood Publishing Company,Farmingdale,New York. Delcourt,PA and HR Delcourt 1981 Vegetation Maps for Eastern North America: 40,000 Years B.P. to Present. In R.C. Romans(editor)Geobotany II. New York: Olenum Publishing Press. Deming,JG and M Almy 1987 A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Audubon Country Club Tract in Northwest Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota, Florida. FMSF 1487. 1988 Mitigative Excavation at Selected Portions of Site Complex 8CR860 in Northwest Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota, Florida. FMSF 1813. Dickel,D and RS Carr 1992 Archaeological Investigations at Bonita Bay Properties,Phase II. Lee County, FL. AHC Technical Report#49. Douglass,AE 1885 Ancient Canals on the South-west Coast of Florida.American Antiquarian 7:227-285. 1890 Mounds in Florida.American Antiquarian 12:105-107. Durnford, CD 1895 The discovery of aboriginal netting,rope,and wood implements in a muck deposit in west Florida. American Naturalist 29: 1032-1039. Eck,CR 1997 An Archaeological Survey of the Pembroke Center Parcel DRI, Broward County, Florida.AHC Technical Report#198. Ehrenhard,JE,RS Carr,and RC Taylor 1978 The Archaeological Survey of Big Cypress National Preserve: Phase I. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. 1979 The Big Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 2. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. Ehrenhard,JE and RC Taylor 1980 The Big Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 3. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee,Florida. 36 Ehrenhard,JE,RC Taylor,and G Komara 1980 Big Cypress National Preserve Cultural Resource Inventory Season 4. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. Fay,P and RS Carr 1990 An Archaeological Review Of Select Sites of Impact in the National Panther Refuge, Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#22. Fradkin,A 1976 The Wightman Site: A Study of Prehistoric Culture and Environment on Sanibel Island, Lee County, Florida. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville. Fuhrmeister,C,RJ Austin,and H Hansen 1990 Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Collier Tract 22 Development Site, Collier County, Florida. Piper Archaeological Research Inc. St. Petersburg, Florida. FMSF 2423. Glowacki,Mary 2003 Inventory and Assessment of Cultural Resources in the Picayune State Forest, Collier County, Florida. Report #8929 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. Goggin,JM 1939 A Ceramic Sequence in South Florida.New Mexico Anthropologist 3:36-40. 1940 The distribution of pottery wares in the Glades Archaeological Area of South Florida. New Mexico Anthropologist 4:22-33. 1947 A Preliminary Definition of Archaeological areas and Periods in Florida. American Antiquity 13:114-127. 1949a Cultural Occupation at Goodland Point, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 2(3- 4): 65-91. 1949b The Archaeology of the Glades Area. Unpublished MS on file, SE Archaeological Research Center,NPS,Tallahassee,Fl. 1949c Cultural Traditions in Florida Prehistory. hi J.W. Griffin (editor) The Florida Indian and his Neighbors. Winter Park,Florida:Rollins College. Goggin,JM and WC Sturtevant 1964 The Calusa: A Stratified, Nonagricultural Society (with notes on sibling marriage). In W Goodenough (editor) Explorations in Cultural Anthropology: Essays in Honor ofGeorge Peter Murdock New York:McrnawHIlL Pp.179-291. Griffin,JW 37 1974 Archaeology and Environment in South Florida. In P.J. Gleason (ed.), Environments of South Florida: Present and Past II. Coral Gables: Miami Geological Society,pp 342-346. 1988 The Archaeology of Everglades National Park: A Synthesis. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. Hrdlicka,A 1922 The Anthropology of Florida. Deland, Florida: Publications of the Florida State Historical Society 1. Hutchinson,Dale L. 2002 Osteological Analysis of the Aqui Esta Mound Population. Florida Anthropological Society Publication 15,Tallahassee,FL. Kenworthy,CJ 1883 Ancient Canals in Florida. Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1881: 105-109. Kroeber,AL 1939 Cultural and Natural Areas in Native North America. Berkeley: University of California Press. Laxson,DD 1966 The Turner River Jungle Gardens Site, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 19: 125-140. °. Lee,AR,JG Beriault, W Buschelman,J Belknap 1993 A Small Site - Mulberry Midden, 8CR697 - Contributes to Knowledge of the Transitional Period. The Florida Anthropologist 46:43-52. Lee,AR,JG Beriault,J Belknap,WM Buschelman,AL Snapp and JW Thompson 1997 Salvage Excavation of an Archaic Period Special-Purpose Site in Collier County. The Florida Anthropologist 50:11-24. 1988 Heineken Hammock, 8CR231: A Late Archaic Corridor Site in Collier County. Southwest Florida Archaeological Society.Naples,Florida. Luer,George M. 1980 The Aqui Esta Site at Charlotte Harbor: A Safety Harbor-Influenced Prehistoric Aboriginal Site. Paper Presented at the32nd Annual Meeting of the Florida Anthropological Society, Winter Park. 2002 The Aqui Esta Mound: Ceramic and Shell Vessels of the Early Mississippian- Influenced Englewood Phase. Florida Anthropological Society Publication 15, Tallahassee,FL. McMichaels,A 38 1982 A Cultural Resource Assessment of Horrs Island, Collier County, Florida. MA thesis, Department of Anthropology University of Florida,Gainesville. Mankowski,Joseph F. 2006 Archaeological Investigations at the Lely Sites: Prehistoric Occupations on Southwest Florida Tree Islands. Master of Arts Dissertation. University of Leicester. Marquardt,WH 1984 The Josslyn Island Mound and its Role in the Investigation of Southwest Florida's Past. Gainesville:Florida State Museum,Department of Anthropology, Miscellaneous Project Report Series 22. 1987 The Calusa Social Formation in Protohistoric South Florida.In T.C.Patterson and C.W. Galley(editors) Power Relations and State Formation. Washington,D.C.: Archaeology Section,American Anthropological Association,pp. 98-116. 1988 Politics and Production Among the Calusa of South Florida. In T. Ingold, D. Riches,and J.Woodburn(editors) Hunters and Gatherers 1:History, Evolution, and Social Change. London: Berg Publishers,pp. 161-188. 1992 Recent Archaeological and Paleoenvironmental Investigations in Southwest Florida. In W.H. Marquardt (editor), Culture and Environment in the Domain of the Calusa. Gainesville: Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies. Monograph 1,University of Florida,pp. 9-58. Martinez,C 1977 Archaeological and Historical Survey and Assessment of the Proposed Collier County 201 Waste Water Management Facilities, Collier County, Florida. Russell &Axon Inc. and Smally,Welford&Nalven Inc. FMSF#257. Milanich,JT 1994 Archaeology ofPrecolumbian Florida. Gainesville:University Press of Florida. Milanich JT,J Chapman,AS Cordell, S Hale,and R Merrinan 1984 Prehistoric Development of Calusa Society in Southwest Florida: Excavation on Useppa Island. In D.D. Davis (editor) Perspectives on Gulf Coast Prehistory. Gainesville:University Presses of Florida,pp. 258-314. Milanich,JT. and CH Fairbanks 1980 Florida Archaeology. New York:Academic Press. Miller,JJ and ML Fryman 1978 An Archaeological and Historical Survey of the Collier Bay Tract, Marco Island. Cultural Resource Management Inc., Tallahassee,Florida. FMSF#3124. Moore,CB 39 1900 Certain Antiquities of the Florida West Coast.Journal of the Academy of Natural Science,Philadelphia 11:369-394. 1905 Miscellaneous Investigations in Florida. Journal of the Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia 13:299-325. 1907 Notes on the Ten Thousand Islands. Journal of the Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia 13:458-470. Morrell,RL 1967 Florida site form for site 8CR107. 1969 Fiber-tempered Pottery from Southwestern Florida. Abstract of presented paper, American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, on file at AHC. Russo,M 1990 Report I on Archaeological Investigations by the Florida Museum of Natural History at Horrs Island, Collier County,Florida. FMSF 2353. Scholl,DW,FC Craighead,and M Stuiver 1969 Florida Submergence Curve Revisited: Its Relation to Coastal Sedimentation Rates. Science 163: 562-564. Sears,WH 1956 The Turner River Site, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 9(2):47-60. 1966 Everglades National Park Archaeological Base Mapping Part I. Unpublished, FMSF MS# 1009. 1967 Archaeological Survey of the Cape Coral Area at the Mouth of the Caloosahatchee River. The Florida Anthropologist 20: 93-102. 1982 Fort Center:An Archaeological Site in the Lake Okeechobee Basin. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. Simons,MB 1884 Shell Heaps in Charlotte Harbor, Florida. Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1882: 794-796. Stirling,MW 1931 Mounds of the Vanished Calusa Indians of Florida. Smithsonian Institution Explorations and Field Work for 1930: 167-172. 1933 Report of the Chief.Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 48:3-21. 40 1936 Florida Cultural Affiliations in Relation to Adjacent Areas. In Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Alfred Louis Kroeber. Berkeley: University of California Press,pp 351-357. Swift,A and RS Carr 1989 An Archaeological Survey of Caxambas Estates, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Miami, FL. AHC Technical Report #13. Taylor,RC 1984 Everglades National Park Archaeological Inventory and Assessment Season 2: Interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. 1985 Everglades National Park Archaeological Inventory and Assessment Season 3: Interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee,Florida. Taylor,RC and G Komara 1983 Big Cypress Preserve Archaeological Survey: Season 5. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. Van Beck,JC and LM Van Beck 1965 The Marco Midden,Marco Island,Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 16:1-20. Widmer,RJ 1974 A Survey and Assessment of Archaeological Resources on Marco Island, Collier County,Florida.Ms on file,FMSF#265. 1983 The Evolution of the Calusa, a Non-agricultural Chiefdom on the Southwest Florida Coast. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, distributed by University Microfilms International,Ann Arbor,Michigan. 1996 Recent Excavations at the Key Marco Site, 8CR48, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 49:10-26. Williams,JL 1837 The Territory of Florida. Gainesville:University Press of Florida. 41 APPENDIX I: SURVEY LOG 42 Pa.e 1 f ; Survey Log Sheet . Florida Master Site File `f* Version 4.1 1/07 CG..o,.........:o.o the Survey Log Sheet for detailed Instructions. Identification and Bibliographic Information Survey Project(name and project phase)Olde Florida Golf Club 2013.29 Report Title(exactly as on title page)A Reconnaissance Cultural Resources Assessment of the Olde Florida Golf Club Parcel,Collier County,Florida Report Author(s)(as on title page—individual or corporate;last names first)Carr,Robert S.;White,John Wesley;Grady, Michael;Beriault,John G. Publication Date(year) 2013 Total Number of Pages in Report(count text,figures,tables,not site)41 Publication Information(Give series and no.in series,publisher and city.For article or chapter,cite page numbers.Use the style of American Antiquity.) AHC Technical Report 4982 Supervisors)of Fieldwork(whether or not the same as author[s];last name first)Carr, Robert S. Affiliation of Fieldworkers(organization,city)Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. Key Words/Phrases(Don't use the county,or common words like archaeology,structure,survey,architecture. Limit each word or phrase to 25 characters.) Survey Sponsors(corporation,government unit or person who is directly paying for fieldwork) Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. Address/Phone Recorder of Log Sheet Beriault,John G. Date Log Sheet Completed 4-24-13 Is this surve or project a continuation of a previous project? X No 8 Yes: Mapping Counties(List each one in which field survey was done-do not abbreviate;use supplement sheet if necessary)Collier USGS 1:24,000 Map(s):Map Name/Date of Latest Revision(use supplement sheet if necessary):Corkscrew SE,rev.1987 Description of Survey Area Dates for Fieldwork: Start 4-20-13 End 4-24-13 Total Area Surveyed(fill in one) hectares +540 acres Number of Distinct Tracts or Areas Surveyed 1 If Corridor(fill In one for each):Width meters feet Length kilometers 4 miles HR6E066R010T Florida Master Site File,Division of Historical Resources,Gray Building,500 South Bronough Street,Tallahassee,Florida 323990250 Phone 850.2456440,FAX 850.2456439,Email:SItaFile@dos.state.fl.us Page 2 Survey Log Sheet Survey# Research and Field Methods Types of Survey(check all that apply): X archaeological 9 architectural X historical/archival 9 underwater 0 other. Preliminary Methods(4Chedk as many as apply to the project as a whole.) 0 Florida Archives(Gray Building) 0 library research-local public 9 local properly or tax records X other historic maps 0 Florida Photo Archives(Gray Building) 9 library-special collection-nonlocal 0 newspaper files X soils maps or data X Site Ale property search X Public Lands Survey(maps at DEP) X literature search X windshield survey X Site File survey search X local informant(s) 0 Sanbom Insurance maps X aerial photography X other(describe)Excavation of 70 shovel tests Archaeological Methods(4Check as many as apply to the project as a whole.) 9 Check here if NO archaeological methods were used. 9 surface collection,controlled 0 other screen shovel test(size: ) 0 block excavation(at least 2x2 M) X surface collection,gricontrolled 0 water screen(finest size: ) 0 soil resistivity Xshovel test-1/4'skreen 9 posthole tests 0 magnetometer 9 shovel test-1/8'screen 9 auger(size:__) 0 side scan sonar 9 shovel test 1/16'screen 0 coring 0 unknown 9 shovel test-unscreened 9 test excavation(at least 1x2 M) 9 other(describe) HistoricaVArchitectural Methods(4Check as many as apply to the project as a whole.) 9 Check here if NO historicaVarchitectural methods were used. 9 building permits 0 demolition permits 9 neighbor interview 9 subdivision maps 9 commercial permits X exposed ground inspected 9 occupant interview 0 tax records 9 interior documentation 9 local property records 0 occupation permits 0 unknown 0 other(describe): Scope/Intensity/Procedures Review of vintage and recent aerials,literature review,pedestrian survey,then excavation of 70 shovel tests across .arcel. Survey Results (cultural resources recorded) Site Significance Evaluated?X Yes 0 No If Yes,circle NR-eligible/significant site numbers below. Site Counts: Previously Recorded Sites 0 Newly Recorded Sites) 1 Previously Recorded Site Ws with Site File Update Forms(List site#'s without"8.' Attach supplementary pages if necessary) Newly Recorded Site#'s (Are you sure all are originals and not updates? Identify methods used to check for updates,i.e.,researched Site File records. List site#'s without'8.° Attach supplementary pages if necessary CR1305 Site Form Used: X Site File Pa.er Form 0 SmartForm II Electronic Recordin' Form REQUIRED: ATTACH PLOT OF SURVEY AREA ON PHOTOCOPIES OF USGS 1 :24,000 MAP(S) DO NOT USE SITE RILE USE ONLY DO NOT USE BAR`R4llated 'BHP-Related` 9 872 0 1A32 # 0 State Historic Preservation Grant 9 CARL 0 UW 9 Compliance Review:CRAT# HR8E066R0107 Florida Master Site FIN,Division of Historical Resources,Gray Building,500 South Bronough Street,Tallahassee,Florida 329.0250 Phone 850.245.6440,FAX 850.2456439,Email:SltsFllsedos.state.fl.us } t y L:wr ,T� F Y ..- •m• ... -n. , V .r.II p]r • r w iL:'''''''''', r, "" •� 1 e i i.1 xryy..•.,� �.•,.: +* a s.. ry4 fih• :o-w , ,,, '� '+." •b a Tc. .fir *a.� „IN \ •l .n °t.} 'kt 004 -b _ • ..: • . « ro ts- ^" y s` a�- =•a.�§ w " yn• a Y 4. ,.•y. .k R s r P .m• tx«" , .a q ♦. b. m Y . a <1 s• N 7 r .ry 7-•t� .r 4 'H : -,,,, rt• u k wrx• ii -'''• TO."'""7 • • • • • • • • • � • • i • ' • • • • •• • . I; • BMtl USGS Map of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel. TOWNSHIP 48S,RANGE 27E,SECTION 31 0 1/4 1/2 I USGS Map: CORKSCREW SW,REV.1987 1 Mile approx. 0 .4 .8 1.6 Km. approx. APPENDIX II: FLORIDA SITE FORM 4 46 Page 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site#8CR1305 ,w- FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE Field Date X Original �r ��► _4_/_22__/ 13 0 Update "�+ l Version 4.0 1/07 Form Date Consult Guide to Aivhaeologi al Site form for detaled instructions. —4_1_25 /13 Recorder# Site Name(s)Oak Grove Site Multiple Listing(DHR only) Project Name Reconnaissance CR Assessment of the Olde Florida Golf Club Parcel Survey#(DHR only) Ownership:Xprivate-profit ❑private-nonprofit aprivate-individual ❑private-nonspecific ❑aty ❑county ❑state ❑federal ❑Native American ❑foreign ❑unknown I.O( -A 1 ION & \I i'I'I V(. USGS 7.5 Map Name&Date Corkscrew SE,rev.1987 Plat or Other Map City/Town(within 3 miles)Naples In City Limits?oyes )(no ❑unknown County Collier Township_48S Range_27E Section 31 1/4 section:XNW oSW ❑SE ONE ❑Irregular-name: Landgrant Tax Parcel# UTM Coordinates:Zone 016 X17 Easting 0 Northing 0 Other Coordinates: X Y: Coordinate System&Datum Address/Vicinity/Route to Parcel is south on Krape Road off Immokalee Road(CR846)then south on woods trail from end of Krape%mile.Site was discovered in sand trail at north edge of higher ground oak grove. Name of Public Tract(e.g.,park) 11 1'1 OF 'i i 1: (cliccI, ..n mliam „pH,l SETTING* STRUCTURES OR FEATURES* FUNCTION* X Land(Mashie!) 0 Wetland(palustnne) ❑log boat ❑fort ❑mad segment X campsite O Lake/Pond(Iacustdne) O usually flooded CI agridfarm building X lithic scatter ❑shell midden X extractive site O River/Stream/Creek(Milne) ❑usually dry O burial mound ❑mill O shell mound X habitation(prehistoric) 0 Tidal(estuarine) 0 Cave/Sink(subterranean) ❑building remains ❑mission ❑shipwreck ❑homestead(historic) O Saltwater(marine) ❑terrestrial O cemetery/grave ❑mound,nonspecific 0 subsurface features CI farmstead ❑aquatic ❑dump/refuse ❑plantation O surface scatter O village(prehistoric) O earthworks(historic) ❑platform mound ❑well ❑town(historic) O Other settings,structures,features a functions 0 quany ( l I. I I RI i'I IlIO1)ti (ncccl. ill Elicit aphl)) ABORIGINAL* ❑Englewood 0 Manasota O St Johns(nonspecific) ❑Swift Creek(nonspecific) NON-ABORIGINAL* ❑Alachua 0 Fort Walton O Mississippian ❑St Johns I ❑Swift Creek,Early ❑First Spanish 1513-99 X Archaic(nonspecific) ❑Glades(nonspecific) O Mount Taylor ❑St Johns II ❑Swift Creek,Late ❑First Spanish 1600-99 ❑Archaic,Early ❑Glades I? ❑Norwood ❑Santa Rosa ❑Transitional O First Spanish 1700-1763 O Archaic,Middle ❑Glades II? ❑Orange O Santa Rosa-Swift Creek O Weeden Island(nonspecific) O First Spanish(nonspecific) 0 Archaic,Late 0 Glades III ❑Paleoindian ❑Seminole(nonspecific) ❑Weeden Island I 0 British 1763-1783 0 Belle Glade ❑Hidcory Pond 0 Pensacola ❑Seminole:Colonization 0 Weeden Island II 0 Second Spanish 1783-1821 O Cades Pond O Leon-Jefferson ❑Perioo Island O Seminole:1 st War To 2nd O Prehistoric(nonspecific) ❑American Territorial 1821-45 0 Cakosahatchee ❑Malabar I ❑Safety Harbor ❑Seminole:2nd War To 3rd 0 Prehistoric non-ceramic ❑American Civl War 1861.65 ❑Deptford ❑Malabar II ❑St Augustine ❑Seminole:3rd War&After O Prehistoric ceramic O American 19th Century O American 20th Century ❑Other(List less cammon phases or specific sub-phases. For historic sites,give specific dates if known.) O American(nonspecific) ❑African-American S Consult Guide to Archaeological Site Form for preferred descriptions not listed above(data are coded fields). (11'1\ION OI RI sOt R( I ',l(;AII l( \\( I Potentially eligible individually for National Register of Historic Places? oyes X no ❑insufficient information Potentially eligible as contributor to a National Register district? Oyes x no ❑Insufficient information Explanation of Evaluation(required if evaluated;use separate sheet if needed)Based on current data site is a sparse lithic scatter. Recommendations for Owner or SHPO Action Monitorin• durin• •round-disturbin r activities. DHR USE ONLY OFFICIAL EVALUATION DHR USE ONLY NR List Date SHPO-Appears to meet criteria for NR listing: Dyes Ono ❑insufficient info Date / Init. / / KEEPER-Determined eligible: Dyes Ono Date____/___/ 1 0 Owner Objection - NR Criteria for Evaluation: Oa Db Dc Od (see National Register Bulletin 15,p.2) Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site#8CR1305 III I I) \l I I HIM', Irl1(rl, .111 Ili.ii a ) ri).J SITE DETECTION' SITE BOUNDARIES' o no field check x exposed ground o screened shovel x bounds unknown in remote sensing a unscreened shovel o literature search ❑posthole digger ❑none by recorder ❑insp exposed ground x screened shovel ❑informant report o auger–size:_ o literature search o posthole tests ❑block excavations ❑remote sensing ❑unscreened shovel ❑informant report 0 auger–size: ❑estimate or guess Other methods;number,size,depth,pattern of units;screen size(attach site plan) Extent Size( Depth/stratigraphy of cultural deposit sparse lithic debitage. Temporal Interpretation-Components(check one): X single component ❑multiple component? ❑uncertain Describe each occupation in plan(refer to attached large scale map)and stratigraphically. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations: Integrity-Overall disturbance*: ❑none seen ❑minor X substantial ❑major ❑redeposited ❑destroyed-document) ❑unknown Disturbances/threats/protective measures Bioturbation by ATV activity,future development Surface collection: area collected m2 #collection units Excavation: #noncontiguous blocks \ItIll \( 1 Total Artifacts # (C)ount or(E)stimate? Surface# (C)or(E) Subsurface# (C)or(E) COLLECTION SELECTIVITY• ARTIFACT CATEGORIES*and DISPOSITIONS• (example: A bone-human) ❑unknown X unselective(all artifacts) Pick exactly one code from Disposition t.ist a a a a Distwsitlon Use ❑selective(some artifacts) bone-animal exotic-nonlocal A-category atways collected ❑mixed selectivity _bone-human _glass S-some items in category oonected SPATIAL CONTROL' bone-unspecified A lithics aboriginal ,0-observed first tend,but not collected X uncollected ❑general(not by subarea) _bone-worked _metal-nonprecious R-collected and subsequently left at site ❑unknown ❑controlled(by subarea) _brick/building debris _metal-precious/coin 1 _infomant reported clown p ❑variable spatial control _ceramic-aboriginal _shell-unworked U-unknovm ❑Other —ceramic-nonaboriginal shell-worked daub _Other Artifact Comments DIAGNOSTICS (type or mode,and frequency:e.g.,Suwanee ppk,heat-treated chart,Deptford Check-stamped,ironstone whiteware) 1.chart flakes N= 2 4. N=_ 7. N=_ 2. N=_ 5. N= 8. N=_ 3. N=_ 6. N=_ 9. N=_ t \\ lit )\\IF:A I Nearest fresh water type*&name(incl.relict source)marsh slough Distance(m)/bearing N 300 E Natural community(FNAI category or leave blank) surrounding cypress and pine flatwoods,emerging oak hammock Local vegetation oak hammock Topography Mesic Min Elevation_3-4_meters Max Elevation_3-4_meters Present land use wooded but slightly cleared by presence of sand trails SCS soil series Riviera fine sand,limestone substratum Soil association ii()( t Nit \ I \I l()\ Accessible Documentation Not Filed with the Site File-including field&analysis notes,photos,plans,other Important documents that are permanently accessible: For each separately maintained collection,describe(1)document type(s),'(2)maintaining organization,'(3)file or accession nos.,and(4)descriptive information.Report,Photographs and field notes repose at Archaeological and Historical Conservancy„4800 S.W.646 Avenue,Suite 107,Davie,Florida 33314 Manuscripts or Publications on the site(use separate sheet H needed,give FNSFN if relevant)A Reconnaissance Cultural Resource Assessment of the Olde Florida Golf Club Parcel,Collier County,Florida,AHC Technical Report#982(AHC Project#2013.29) RI ( ORI)lR .. I\I (1I2\1 \\ I I\IOlt\I \ IIO\ Informant Information(name I address/phone I affiliation) Recorder Information(name/address/phone/atbliation)BeriaUlt,John G; Archaeological and Historical Conservancy;954-792-9776; archlgclebellsouth.net Required 0 PHOTOCOPY OF 7.5'USGS QUAD MAP WITH SITE BOUNDARIES MARKED and SITE PLAN Attachments Plan at 1:3,600 or larger. Show boundaries,scale,north arrow,test/collection units,landmarks and date. ,'.7.f 4 l;.C,.,,,:,0 :9 1 ,{ t •n,4 0, 'C'T ,..l.r 4% I• r.4..'2%_0.I 'e 6 w 1 •• w n ♦ • • r 25 .. .ems _ . '• w . 1.} • „.. w .w M it ^f•+• It% • ' ii •'1 Rafi"•M !(*. 4,•, "^ •p'kw M.cif'dr r TM -a fs '�• • n • „. .• "”` • �. r „'t a` ''ik, - ,w fir:• .►. .a. ,ar�0 L}h r . w _ .,. .a- a „c. OAK GROVE SITE, ---0 4 _-- "".m^ 8CR1305 - ----" " - �, .�. '•*� ro n 31 -T .. . «. V • • . k • • 1 • ! 1 1 • •8 ' • 18Ma3 • • 1'' • USGS Map of the Olde Florida Golf Club parcel showing location of the Oak Grove Site, 8CR1305. TOWNSHIP 48S,RANGE 27E,SECTION 31 IMMINEMINI■111.11d + USGS Map CORKSCREW SW,REV.1987 0 1/4 1/2 1 Mile approx. 0 .4 .8 1.6 Km. approx. G O C PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS)and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following pubic facilities: Category Existing LOS Impact from this Application3 Potable Water' 170 gal per capita per day Future potable water demand: 554 single family units x 2.5 persons/unit x 170 gpcd = 235,450 gpd Sanitary Sewer2 Currently N/A(100 gal per There is no sanitary sewer capita per day for future service available to the proposed NEWRF) project at this time. The project will construct and utilize a package plant until the NEWRF is constructed and online. Projected sanitary sewer flows based on the existing LOS for the future NEWRF = 554 single family units x 2.5 persons/unit x 100 gpcd = 138,500 gpd Arterial and Collector Roads; Reference Traffic Impact Reference Traffic Impact Study Name specific road and LOS Study Drainage Water quantity and quality No impacts anticipated. All water standards as specified in management state and federal Collier County Ordinances 74- permits will be obtained from the 50, 90-10, 2001-27, and 2007- applicable state and federal 11 agencies. Additionally, the potential proposed development will result in a positive effect on the pollutant loading rates. 40 Staint& Exhibit I-1 Solid Waste Ten years of permitted landfill Future solid waste for 10 capacity at previous three years of Permitted Landfill years average tons per capita Capacity = 554 single family disposal rate. units x 2.5 persons/unit x 0.52338 (tons per capita Two years of lined cell disposal rate) = 725 annual capacity reflecting at previous tons disposed three years average tons per capita disposal rate. Future solid waste for 2 years of Lined Cell Capacity= 554 single family units x 2.5 persons/unit x 0.52338 (tons per capita disposal rate) = 725 annual tons disposed No impacts anticipated. Based on the calculations above, the current landfill has adequate capacity for the proposed development. Community Parks 1.2 acres per 1,000/population The potential increase in population (554 single family units x 2.5 persons/unit= 1,385 persons) increases the required Community Park acreage by 1.66 acres (1.2 acres x 1.385). The available inventory exceeds the required inventory as of 9/30/17. Therefore, the proposed project poses no impact on the Community Parks in Collier County. Regional Parks 2.7 acres per 1,000/population The potential increase in population (554 single family units x 2.5 persons/unit= 1,385 persons) increases the required Community Park acreage by 3.74 acres (2.7 acres x 1.385). The available inventory exceeds the required inventory as of 9/30/17. Therefore, the proposed project poses no impact on the Regional Parks in Collier County. Stantec Exhibit 1-2 County Jail 2.79 beds per The potential increase in 1,000/population population (554 single family units x 2.5 persons/unit= 1,385 persons) increases the Jail Bed requirement by 3.86 beds (2.79 beds x 1.385). The available inventory exceeds the required inventory as of 9/30/17. Therefore, the proposed project poses no impact on the County Jail and Correctional Facilities in Collier County. County Emergency Medical 1 EMS per 16,400 population The potential increase in Service population (554 single family units x 2.5 persons/unit= 1,385 persons) increases the required EMS units requirement by 0.08 units (1 EMS x (1,385/16,400)). The minimal required increase in EMS units will not change or have an impact on available inventory. Therefore, the proposed project poses no impact on the County Emergency Medical Services. Notes: 1. Project is located within the North County Water Treatment Plant service area for potable water. 2. Project is located within the future Northeast Water Reclamation Facility service area for sanitary service. 3. The existing RFMUD neutral designation allows up to 110 units. By changing to RFMUD receiving designation and using TDR's, up to 554 units could be realized; a potential increase of 444 units. 2. Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property(i.e. water, sewer,fire protection, police protection, schools, and emergency medical services). Please reference Exhibit 1-5 3. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools,fire protection and emergency services. Please reference the table above for the proposed public facilities and the impact the proposed change will have on those facilities. :. stantec Exhibit 1-3 The proposed development is within the Collier County Water and Wastewater Service Area. Solid Waste services are provided by Collier County Waste Management. Fire Protection is provided by Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District. Please reference Exhibits 1-9 through 1-19 for the letters of request for service availability for the other miscellaneous service providers for the subject project, their respective approvals. This project proposes minimal impact to schools as the population is directed toward and is assumed to be primarily seasonal retirees. Fire protection and Emergency Medical Services are currently serving the existing Olde Florida Golf Club. The proposed development will have minimal impacts on these services. Stmt& Exhibit 1-4 I- �, Z w nn o N� w K LO '� Q CQ W N z L { ,e m ti _ • < ; U I . �� , a o zz• C7 r to,. rrQ 8 o ce 5 L IU- c,� } yi > mod.. , • d - : . - 1 ''•, i:ci!.f ktrit,:44,1. "A' : = .,. ' "' - ' '• ' ' —,' ' .:- ': iiiirr:- urr ' '1!, r i .. 4� * ' c mW �y 'i , • . , -1 i _' d d l • x + „* LT NI; -t -; 1 -fik„tt . iT '1 ;, if Tit ,--,;;,,74;'I.1"...„-.,•`;;;,:-' —'-;.-- :"..'1 „ , . ;. ,, ,„....a _}` �iT uclt?I �ri7 Cr7 { '•17I�I r., '4',:,7421, �� � �,�sib �+�.' ,. ,� .... .. .. . . . _. ., . . , r__ _ , . 4..• -, ' ..- 9 gq is .`E _ t - ..r.„„1,t. ,..„.,.1,.41,,_.,,, a! •1 ,aYOlCSt �.. fNf+J-.�.5 5.�,4,',1' "y�. , ^ti (.�La ., ��' ::'- F. +r-Jr +GY F x - O r') E _ E-01- ` yri co co T,•t t C. } 'i Ri M; . C O O 3 1� N .; t _ T' g' +�+ N Q x 3 K�{ IT-; t Airg.'e ... Ft 4 F{II•. ." .. 2�;t7..,fie _it . r :, " '. l t }" ,fit .f '� w a 0 si}Jn� °wa}s)Pi :�O rid 8 t O l/ti0/£ OZ 6MP'Z—IX-3LO—LLcIL9SlZ\sai}i�i�o��ilq�d—IX\s}igiyxa\dow—�l�-100\ UIMDJP\RUIN\LL£IL9SIz\ail oD\9SLZ\:A C C C °''±$ Legend _...,Olde Florida Golf Club and Address Points the DFIRM eff. 5-16-12 Parcels • 100yrpkstg ' '`' GGEST �660Grids s I s_bfe • o S_FIRM_PAN ' a » s_fld_haz ar N FLD_ZONE y -- - — VE taw I AE ii AH ' F ,& X500 a o o X 1 I A a a , F.-- . t ::, a o a e }. a a 4 a a n a 0 1 1 Ca a a O O o a 1 0 0 a a _* ' v 3 q 0 0 a O • a ;,I C i i to o rz ":'''r ° 1, a a c. ,p—.g !p 1..' c t � as a [ fir+ _.._ _.... .-,.-....e.y..,. 114 Special flood hazard areas (SFHA)within the Olde Florida Golf Club property Property boundary identified above 1 Olde Florida Gulf Club 1 FIRM DATA (FEMA) MAP Oak Stantec Exhibit I-6 N A 0 2 5 moo aim min Miles sQ:,.o- NEFWTP We11fieW Ar e. Eastern caner SR-846 County land Trost Shady Hollow Sites .F V"`i ''L Olde Florida Gulf Club) CR89 Heritage Bay Twin Eagle Well Sites' Well Site o MNOKALEE QD 50.29 w�e $cRCrir -"J—S� - F■ka Union Canal GOLDEN GATE BLVD *Ill Sites O' as a' °e o CiSCRwTP w 1-75 1]5 LLVD BERWTP Welttleld A,.. r/llyy�!ll 407. , • f, SERWTP r �1r/ Legend WM Figure 7-7 2008 Water Master Plan Update Potential Future Wellfield Areas The map illustrated above is an excerpt from the 2008 Water Master Plan Update prepared by CDM, and it identifies the approximate locations of all existing and proposed wells, cones of influence and potential future wellfield areas adjacent to the Olde Florida Golf Club property boundary Olde Florida Gulf Club LOCATIONS OF WELLS, FUTURE WELL FIELDS & CONES OF INFLUENCE Stantec Exhibit 1-7 N . _..... r CR446 0 4255 / -i '\'''\\\\.\\ — — Miles t( , Roposed NER 4r IL!"! .i Propose I NERWTP, / CRR5! w 1_ \ Olde Florida Gulf Club IR IMMOKALEE RD ' 2 0 'itQp� m 4 -.-- a tt r =o 0 :_ :-.. NCft'NT= 1 1 ; • DEN GMT I{LVD 'f , _____ e I . -- . \--1 II _ A .. _ u )11 __ ----) 1 t , _ _. 4 l --- — •- sCRmv r Legend jrdy EvisAng1Nells v '.. .' or g Rx,:hater?ipe,e: COM Figure 7-8 2008 Water Master Plan Update NERWTP Weilfield and WTP The map illustrated above is an excerpt from the 2008 Water Master Plan Update prepared by CDM, and it identifies the approximate locations of all existing and proposed wells and cones of influence adjacent to the Olde Florida Golf Club property boundary Olde Florida Gulf Club LOCATIONS OF WELS & CONES OF INFLUENCE v n Exhibit 1-8 Olde Florida Gulf Club Utility Provider Availability of Service Approval Requests/Approvals: • Collier County Request and Approval • Florida Power& Light Request and Approval • Comcast Request and Approval • CenturyLink Request and Approval • Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District Request and Approval Exhibits 1-9 thru 1-19 Stantec ., te- Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Tel:(239)649-4040 Stantec Fax:(239)643-5716 February 21,2013 Project No:215611377 Mr. Nathan Beals, PMP Project Manager Collier County Public Utilities 3339 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112 Subject: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Request for Availability of Service Approval Letter Dear Mr. Beals, On behalf of our Client, Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. and in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code, we are requesting an availability of service approval letter from your department for the subject Project. To assist in your review and written approval, we are enclosing a Public Facility Map (Exhibit I). The application proposes the re-designation of the 554-acre site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Receiving, which would include the potential of up to 554 single family residential units. Based on preliminary per capita calculations for this project, the potable water demand is approximately 235,450 GPD average daily demand (647 GPM peak hourly demand) and wastewater flow is approximately 138,500 GPD average daily flow (385 GPM peak hourly flow). Please note, the existing Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Neutral designation allows up to 110 units, and by changing to "Receiving" and using TDR's, up to 554 units could be realized, which is a potential increase of 444 units. The GPD and GPM numbers noted above represent the demands and flows in support of a total of 554 total units. The property is predominantly surrounded by receiving lands and due to the change in the environmental condition of the property, changing the designation to receiving lands is appropriate. In addition, designating additional lands as receiving lands provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer their TDR's,furthering the goal of converting sending lands to a conservation use. As you are aware, your approval letter is required for the Collier County applications and we would appreciate a response at the earliest time possible. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (239)-649-4040. Sincerely, Consulting Serv' s, Inc. • R mond J. Piacente, Ill, PMP, LEED AP Senior Project Manager, Urban Land Engineering Associate Enc. C: William Barton,PE,Olde Florida Golf Club,Inc.,w/o enc. Margaret Perry,AICP,Stantec,w/enc. v:121561active121 5 61 1 37Tshared1documents\esbm_Itr_utility_availability_of_service_approval_letters_for_ofgc_gmp_amendment_and_rezone.doc Exhibit 1-9 Co -teT Cou-hty Public Utilities Division Planning & Project Management February 21, 2013 Raymond J. Piacente, Ill, PMP, LEED AP WilsonMiller Stantec 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Subject: Olde Florida Golf Club Parcel#'s: 00219160003 and 00219400103 Water and Wastewater Availability Dear Mr. Piacente: Water service is available for the above referenced project via existing lines along Vanderbilt Beach Road at the corner of the property. Wastewater service is available for the above referenced project via existing lines at the corner of Collier Blvd. and Vanderbilt Beach Road (approximately two miles to the west) or along Immokalee Road (approximately one mile to the north) from the corners of the property. Connection to the Collier County Water-Sewer District is required when the property is located within 200 feet of an existing main. Specific connection points for the system tie-ins to water and wastewater lines may be made after submission and approval of the hydraulic calculations by the Planning and Project Management Department, validating that the up/downstream systems are adequate to handle the increase in flow. This letter implies no guarantee that other developments throughout the District will not have an impact on the quantity of potable water and sewage treatment and disposal capacity available to this property until the project has received a commitment for service. Should water supply or sewage treatment and disposal capacity not be available, the Developer would be required to provide an interim means of water supply and treatment and sewage treatment and disposal until the District's facilities have the adequate capacity to serve the project. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (239) 252-2583. Since - y Nathan Beals, Project Manager Planning and Project Management Department cc: Aaron Cromer, Principal Project Manager Craig Callis, Engineering Review Steve Nagy, Wastewater Collections Manager Pam Libby, Water Operations Manager ,v Cheri Rollins, Supervisor Revenue ccita 4 Vanessa Soriano, Fiscal Technician Chris Johnson, Accounting Technician . i . Gary Morocco, Supervisor Revenue Planning&Project Management Department•3339 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 303 •Naples,Florida 34112-5361 •239-252-4285•FAX 239-25 Exhibit 1-10 ‘16----7-1 Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane,Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Tel: (239)649-4040 Stantec Fax:(239)643-5716 February 21,2013 Project No:215611377 Mr.Jim Merriam Florida Power&Light 26430 Old US 41 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Subject: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Request for Availability of Service Approval Letter Dear Mr. Merriam: On behalf of our Client, Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. and in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code, we are requesting an availability of service approval letter from your department for the subject Project. To assist in your review and written approval, we are enclosing a Public Facility Map (Exhibit I). The application proposes the re-designation of the 554-acre site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Receiving, which would include the potential of up to 554 single-family units. The property is predominantly surrounded by receiving lands and due to the change in the environmental condition of the property, changing the designation to receiving lands is appropriate. In addition, designating additional lands as receiving lands provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer their TDR's,furthering the goal of converting sending lands to a conservation use. As you are aware, your approval letter is required for the Collier County applications and we would appreciate a response at the earliest time possible. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (239)-649-4040. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. P■Sien, Ra and J. Piacente, Ill, PMP, LEED AP Senior Project Manager, Urban Land Engineering Associate Enc. C: William Barton,PE,Olde Florida Golf Club,Inc.,w/o enc. Margaret Perry,AICP,Stantec,w/enc. v:121561active1 215611377\sharedldocumentslesbm_Itr utility_availability_of_service_approval_letters_for_ofgc_gmp_amendment_and_rezone.doc Exhibit 1-11 *maw Florida Power&Light Company FPL April 11, 2013 Lucia Martin 3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200 Naples, FL 34105 Re: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Dear Lucia: Thank you for contacting FPL early in your planning process. This will help you to achieve your desired schedule for your project at(property location). At the present time FPL has sufficient capacity to provide electric service to your property. Please fill out the notification of new construction form enclosed with this letter. This information will help us to provide you with the best service in accordance with applicable rates, rules and regulations. You may also respond to us through www.fpl.com. Once we have received the new construction form, I will be contacting you to schedule a pre-design meeting. Enclosed is my business card if you should have any questions about your project. I look forward to developing a good working relationship with you. Sincerely, J es Lillie ssociate Engineer an FPL Group Company Exhibit 1-12 Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Tel: (239)649-4040 Stantec Fax:(239)643-5716 February 21,2013 Project No:215611377 Mr. Mark Cook Project Coordinator Comcast 12600 Westlinks Drive,Suite 4 Fort Myers, FL 33913 Subject: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Request for Availability of Service Approval Letter Dear Mr.Cook: On behalf of our Client, Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. and in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code, we are requesting an availability of service approval letter from your department for the subject Project. To assist in your review and written approval, we are enclosing a Public Facility Map (Exhibit I). The application proposes the re-designation of the 554-acre site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Receiving, which would include the potential of up to 554 single-family units. The property is predominantly surrounded by receiving lands and due to the change in the environmental condition of the property, changing the designation to receiving lands is appropriate. In addition, designating additional lands as receiving lands provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer their TDR's,furthering the goal of converting sending lands to a conservation use. As you are aware, your approval letter is required for the Collier County applications and we would appreciate a response at the earliest time possible. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (239)-649-4040. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 1 EEL Ray and J. Piacente, Ill, PMP, LEED AP Senior Project Manager, Urban Land Engineering Associate Enc. C: William Barton,PE,Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc.,w/o enc. Margaret Perry,AICP,Stantec,w/enc. v:\2156tactive121561137Tshared\documents\esbm Itr_utility_availabiliry_of_se rvice_app roval_letters_for_ofgc_gmp_amendment_and_rezone.doc Exhibit 1-13 omcast 12600 Westlnks Drive Suite 4 Fort Myers, Fl. 33913 Phone: 239-432-1805 April 10, 2013 Re: Olde Florida Golf Club Utility Easement Approval and Letter of Availability Dear Lucia Martin, Comcast can provide its services to the above referenced property upon the execution of Cable Television Installation and Service Agreement. You will need to contact Nikki Mello at 239-415-4775. Comcast has reviewed the proposed plat for the above referenced property and found the easements provided to be adequate for the placement of our broadband facilities. If you have any further concerns, please contact me at (239)432-1805. Sincerely, Mark Cook, Project Coordinator Exhibit 1-14 Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 0 3200 Bailey Lane,Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Tel:(239)649-4040 Stantec Fax: (239)643-5716 February 21,2013 Project No:215611377 Mr.Walter Alvarez Century Link PO Box 2469 Naples, Florida 34106 Subject: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Request for Availability of Service Approval Letter Dear Mr.Alvarez, On behalf of our Client, Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. and in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code, we are requesting an availability of service approval letter from your department for the subject Project. To assist in your review and written approval, we are enclosing a Public Facility Map (Exhibit I). The application proposes the re-designation of the 554-acre site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Receiving, which would include the potential of up to 554 Nor.- single-family units. The property is predominantly surrounded by receiving lands and due to the change in the environmental condition of the property, changing the designation to receiving lands is appropriate. In addition, designating additional lands as receiving lands provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer their TDR's,furthering the goal of converting sending lands to a conservation use. As you are aware, your approval letter is required for the Collier County applications and we would appreciate a response at the earliest time possible. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (239)-649-4040. Sincerely, c Consulting Se yri_res, Inc. R and J. Piacente, Ill, PMP, LEED AP Senior Project Manager, Urban Land Engineering Associate Enc. C: William Barton,PE,Olde Florida Golf Club,Inc.,w/o enc. Margaret Perry,AICP,Stantec,w/enc. C v:\2156\active12156113771sharedtdocuments\esbm—Itr_ublity_availability_of_service_approval_letters for_ofgc_gmp_amendment_and_rezone.doc Exhibit 1-15 CenturyLinkTM February 22, 2013 Lucia Martin Permit Coordinator Stantec 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida RE: Availability of Service/Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment SEC 31, TWP 48, RNG 27 Collier County, FL Dear Ms. Martin, In response to your letter dated February 21, 2013 Centurylink Corporation will provide telephone service, upon request, to Olde Florida Golf Club located in Golden Gate, Florida. Telephone service will be provided based on the rules and regulations covered in our Local and General Exchange Tariff, approved and on file with the Florida Public Service Commission. In order for us to meet your service expectations and provide for the timely installation of access facilities,we need your cooperation on the following items: 1. Sufficient utility easements, as agreed to by Centurylink for construction of communication facilities must be recorded either through incorporation with the recorded plat of the Pine Air Lakes Promenade Shopping Center, or in a manner as may be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.A minimum 10' wide utility easement along the cable route to be provided by developer and a 40'X 40' easement may be required for switching equipment. 2. Provide a full set of construction plans and diskette(DGN format or AUTOCAD)furnished to us at the same time as plans are sent to Florida Power& Light Company. 3. All utility easements, rights-of-way, roadways, etc., over which communications construction is necessary must be within six inches of final grade, clear of debris and lot lines properly staked and identified prior to communication facility construction. NOTE: Staking to include grade elevation. 4. Clearing, grading and staking is to be maintained by the developer during Century link construction activity. 5. Deviations to our standard construction procedures from the above, resulting in additional expense to Centurylink, either during or after communication facility construction, will be appropriately billed to and borne by the developer. 6. Road crossings provided and placed by developer at locations indicated by a Centurylink representative. Centurylink will provide markers. 7. Centurylink Corporation shall not be responsible for seeding/mulching disturbed areas of the utility easements. 8. Notify Century link engineering a minimum of 90 days in advance when telephone service will be required within this area. Exhibit 1-16 DATE Page 2 RE: Old Florida Golf Club The following criteria must also be met for any multi-family or commercial building: 1. Entrance conduit to be run from the property corner or utility easement into the mechanical room with no more than one 90-degree sweeps. Size and location to be determined by an Centurylink representative. 2. Access to the power ground (MGN)within five feet of our terminal or placement of a No. 6 Insulated copper ground wire. 3. A single run conduit(3/4 inch suggested)or access route from each unit to the location of the telephone termination point. 5. Conduit and equipment room to be completed 30 days prior to Certificate of Occupancy date. These requirements are necessary due to the tremendous growth within our serving area and Centurylink's use of advance technology. Failure to comply with the above mentioned could result in service delays to this development. Please sign and date the acknowledgments provided below and return it in the self addressed stamped envelope included. If you should require additional information, please contact me at(239) 263-6304 Sincerel , Shelley L. Boy e Network Engineer II—E&C SB/nkr cc: Chron File I hereby acknowledge receipt of this letter and agree with the provisions contained herein. Date Title Exhibit 1-17 Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane,Suite 200 Naples FL 34105 Tel:(239)649-4040 Stantec Fax: (239)643-5716 February 21,2013 Project No:215611377 Mr. Bill Silvester Fire Marshall Golden Gate Fire Control&Rescue District 14575 Collier Boulevard Naples, FL 34119 Subject: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Request for Availability of Service Approval Letter Dear Mr.Silvester: On behalf of our Client, Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. and in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code, we are requesting an availability of service approval letter from your department for the subject Project. To assist in your review and written approval, we are enclosing a Public Facility Map (Exhibit I). The application proposes the re-designation of the 554-acre site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Receiving, which would include the potential of up to 554 single-family units. The property is predominantly surrounded by receiving lands and due to the change in the environmental condition of the property, changing the designation to receiving lands is appropriate. In addition, designating additional lands as receiving lands provides additional lands for owners of TDR's to transfer their TDR's,furthering the goal of converting sending lands to a conservation use. As you are aware, your approval letter is required for the Collier County applications and we would appreciate a response at the earliest time possible. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (239)-649-4040. Sincerely, S Consulting Sep, Inc. R and J. Piacente, Ill, PMP, LEED AP Senior Project Manager, Urban Land Engineering Associate Enc. C: William Barton,PE,Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc.,w/o enc. Margaret Perry,AICP,Stantec,w/enc. • v:\21561active1215611377\sharedIdocumentslesbm_Itr_util ity_availability_d_service_approval_letters_tor_ofgc_gmp_amendmenl_and_rezone.doc Exhibit 1-18 GfpaATEM GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT R / 14575 Collier Boulevard •Naples,FL 34119•(239)348.7540•(239)348-7546 FAX aNcu / http:l/www.00fire.com April 11,2013 Stantec Consulting services, Inc. Attn: Raymond Piacente, Senior Project Manager. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 Subject: Fire Service Availability for Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Piacente: This letter is to confirm that the Golden Gate Fire Control& Rescue District will provide fire protection and rescue services, for Olde Florida Golf Club of the re-designation of the 554-acre site from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed Use District-Receiving, which would include the potential of up to 554 single-family units. If you have any questions,please feel free to call me at(239) 348-7450. Sincerely, iJ.Zolan Sapp Interim Fire Chief JNS/sm Our Family Protecting Yours Exhibit 1-19 n ec OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT PREPARED FOR: OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB, INC. 9393 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD EXTENSION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34120 PREPARED BY: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. 3200 BAILEY LANE, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 FEBRUARY 2013 EXHIBIT J OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 2 TRIP GENERATION 3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION &ASSIGNMENT 4 STUDY AREA DETERMINATION 6 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 7 2012 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 8 2022 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 8 CONCLUSION 9 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: Project Location 3 FIGURE 2: Percent Project Trip Distribution 5 FIGURE 3: Trip Assignment 6 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: Trip Generation 4 TABLE 2: Study Area Determination 7 TABLE 3: Background Traffic 7 TABLE 4: Existing Conditions 8 TABLE 5: Future Conditions 8 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A 10 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to document the transportation impact analysis for the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment of the Olde Florida Golf Club from Rural Fringe Mixed- Use District - Neutral to Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District - Receiving. The 554-acre subject property is located east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) on the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. The project location is shown in Figure 1. The proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map does not change the underlying use of the land or otherwise alter the existing A-Agricultural zoning. The proposed change would allow for an increase in residential density when acquired through the use of transfer of development rights (TDRs). The existing and proposed conditions analyzed herein are as follows: The existing FLUE designation and A-Agriculture zoning currently allows: • Golf Course, and/or • A maximum of 110 Single Family Residential Units The proposed FLUE designation and A-Agriculture zoning would permit: • Golf Course, and/or • A maximum of 110 Single Family Residential Units; or a maximum of 554 Single Family Residential Units (when acquired through the use of TDRs). A TIS Methodology Meeting was held on Wednesday, February 20, 2013, and pursuant to the approved methodology (attached as Appendix A), existing 2012 conditions as well as the future year 2022 conditions were analyzed to identify any potential impacts due to the land use change. Impacts were evaluated during the p.m. peak hour. Initially, due to the nature of the requested land use change, no intersection analyses were required. Staff reserved the right to require such analysis following a review of the initial TIS submittal. 2 4( IMAtOKALEE 'D .6F ., ({{f}f y t-46�t i # _�.-1,..,r i C .- SITE� .,.''� jr p 6 gZetat rf �' +« VANDERBILT�BEA �I �r cl - ^.' , t s' lit2 �•. � . � __ ; _ 1.-:,.. ...", : ice j y ,� ya t ' # r: .. a o «" .dvs, s r t p e I y .' �"t; ,t �& �,,, t . .4�'i1i GOLDENGATEBLVD t t " 'eb ' ''' w .) t- h< fP., .d... s-, ;„4,...- fz A' FIGURE 1: Project Location TRIP GENERATION Trip generation rates were estimated for the p.m. peak-hour. The p.m. peak-hour was used in this analysis because it yields the higher trip generation rate when compared to the a.m. peak- hour. The estimated net increase in external trips by the proposed amendment, assuming the maximum utilization of TDRs at final build-out, is 377 p.m. peak-hour two-way trip ends. The p.m. peak hour trip generation is summarized in Table 1. Because golf course use is allowed under current and proposed conditions, it was not necessary to analyze the golf course trips since they would not affect the net external traffic results. All trip rates/equations for the analysis have been based upon the information contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. 3 Table 1: Trip Generation ITE Land PM Peak PM Peak Total Trips External Trips Future Laid Use Hour Trip Enter Exit internal Pass•by Use Units Size capture Map Designation Category Rate/ Split Split Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Equation Single Rural Fringe Mixed Family Per In(T)= Use District- Detached Unit 110 .90In(x)+ 63% 37% 114 72 42 0% 0% 114 72 42 Neutral Housing- .51 210 Single Rural Fringe Mixed Family Per In(T)_ Use District- Detached Unit 554 .901n(x)+ 6396 37% 491 309 182 0% 0% 491 309 182 Receiving Housing- .51 210 _ Net New Trips 377 238 139 377 238 139 TRIP DISTRIBUTION &ASSIGNMENT The traffic generated by the proposed project was distributed and assigned to the adjacent roadway network using a manual distribution. All project traffic will enter/exit the site via the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. Project traffic was distributed once hitting the Collier Boulevard intersection based on turning movement data. The project traffic was assigned to all subsequent segments in which the peak-hour peak-direction project traffic exceeds two (2) percent of the level of service (LOS) standard. The Percent Project Trip Distribution is shown in Figure 2. The assignment of net new directional trips is shown in Figure 3. 4 Immokalee Rd 25% 35% 42% 10% au Is 2 cc 2 m p C Gi in 0 E t) J y 12% 3% 52% Site 25% 25%, Vanderbilt Beach Rd 36% 103% 8% 12% 2% Golden Gate Blvd 10% Legend-Figure 2 Existing Roadway 00% Distribution Percentage N Figure 2: Percent Project Trip Distribution 5 Immokalee Rd 60 83 - 100 24 o j > r m a N 0 a n o 0 J U J 238 29 7 124 Site �■ Vanderbilt Beach Rd 60 60 86 238 - 19 29 5 Golden Gate Blvd 24 I Legend•F gure 3 Existing Roadway 00 Trips Assigned N Figure 3: Trip Assignment STUDY AREA DETERMINATION The extent of the roadway network to be studied was based upon the Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines and Procedures. The study area consists of significantly impacted roadway segments and major intersections at the termini of the significantly impacted roadways. Significantly impacted segments are defined as roadway segments for which project traffic is expected to consume at least two (2) percent of Collier County's peak-hour peak- direction level of service. The results of the study area determination are provided in Table 2. The segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road east of Collier Boulevard is not listed in the Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). The maximum service volume equivalent to LOS E was obtained from the 2012 FDOT Generalized LOS Tables. Per Collier County's TIS criteria, one segment is significantly impacted. An analysis of Vanderbilt Beach Road from the Site to Collier Boulevard as well as the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection will be analyzed. 6 Table 2: Study Area Determination ' #of Lanes Directional %Project Directional I Exceeds Each LOS Service 2%of Traffic Project Trips 2% Segment From To Dir Std Volume LOS Assigned Assigned Threshold Collier Blvd Immokalee Rd Vanderbil:Beat:Rc 3 E 3,000 60 52', 124 Collier Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Golden Gate Blvd. 3 E 3,000 60 12: 29 No Immokalee Rd Collier Blvd Wilson Blvd 3 E 3,300 66 10% 24 No Immokalee Rd Collier Blvd Logan Blvd 3 E 3,200 64 42% 100 Ye. Immokalee Rd Logan Blvd 1-75 3 E 3,500 70 35% 83 Yes Immokalee Rd 1-75 Livingston Rd i 3 E 3.500 70 25% 60 No Vanderbilt Beach Rd Site Entrance Collier Blvd 1 E 720 14 100% 238 Yes Vanderbik Beach Rd Collier Blvd 'Logan Blvd 3 E 3,000 60 3b4, 86 Yes Vanderbilt Beach Rd Logan Blvd Livingston Rd 3 E 3,000 60 25% 60 No BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Background traffic was obtained from the 2012 Collier County AUIR. A two (2) percent annual growth rate was used to grow existing traffic volumes to 2022 traffic volumes. Trip bank volumes from the AUIR have been assumed in the 2% background traffic volumes growth. Table 4 summarizes the background traffic growth. Table 3: Background Traffic 2012 2022 Growth Road Name From To PHPD PHPD Volume Rate Volume Collier Blvd Immokalee Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd 1285 it 2% 1,566 Immokalee Rd Collier Blvd Logan Blvd 1647 (1) 2% 2,008 Immokalee Rd Logan Blvd 1-75 1647 111 2% 2,008 Vanderbilt Beach Rd Site Entrance Collier Blvd 141 (2) 2% 186 Vanderbilt Beach Rd _Collier Blvd _Logan Blvd 1089 (1) 2% 1,327 (1) 2012 AUIR (2) 2008 Traffic Counts 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS Since the Collier County AUIR does not provide information for Vanderbilt Beach Road from the Site to Collier Boulevard, the Generalized FDOT service volumes were used. Based on the distribution to/from the site, the p.m. peak-hour peak-direction of project traffic is traveling westbound away from the site. The results of the 2012 existing conditions level of service analysis are summarized in Table 4 and indicate that all roadway segments within the study area are operating within Collier County's adopted level of service standard. Table 4: Existing Conditions Directional 2012 Road Name From To LOS Exisiting V/Std Ratio LOS Volume(1) Volumes(1) Collier Blvd Immokalee Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd E 3000 1285 0.43 S Immokalee Rd Collier Blvd Logan Blvd E 3200 1647 0.51 C Immokalee Rd Logan Blvd 675 E 3500 1647 0.47 C Vanderbilt Beach Rd Site Entrance Collier Blvd E 720 141 0.20 A Vanderbilt Beach Rd Collier Blvd Logan Blvd E 3000 1089 0.36 B (1) 2012 AUIR 2022 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The future traffic consists of the existing traffic adjusted by a two (2) percent annual growth rate to the year 2022 as described in Table 3, plus 100% of the potential site-generated project traffic. Future traffic conditions are illustrated in Table 5 and indicate that all roadway segments within the study area are operating within Collier County's adopted level of service standard. Table 5: Future Conditions LOS Directional 2022 2022 2022 vIStd Road Name From To Service Background Project Estimated LOS Std Volume(1) Volumes Trips Total Ratio (Abel blvd Immokalee Rd banderbilt Beach Rd E 3000 1566 124 1690 0.56 C Immokalee Rd Collier Blvd Logan Blvd E 3200 2008 100 2108 0.56 C Immokalee Rd Logan Blvd I-75 E _ 3500 2008 83 2091 0.50 C Vanderbilt Beach Rd Site Entrance Collier Blvd E 720 186 238 424 0.59 A Vanderbilt Beach Rd _Collier Blvd Logan Blvd E 3000 1327 86 1413 _ 0.47 _ C {1) 2012 AUIR 8 CONCLUSION This analysis has been performed as part of a request to amend the Growth Management Plan. Based on the link-level capacity analysis documented in this report, all study area links examined as part of this analysis meet Collier County's adopted level of service standards for both the current and future conditions. If required, a more detailed analysis will be performed at such future time as a rezone, plat or similar application is submitted. 9 APPENDIX"A" 10 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 02.20.13 Time: 11:00 a.m. Location: DSC 2800 North Horseshoe Drive People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1)Jeff Perry, SCSI 2)John Podczerwinsky 3) Reed Jarvi 4) 5) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: Jeff Perry, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner Organization: Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. (SCSI) Address &Telephone Number: 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200, Naples, FL 34105 239-649-4040 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: John Podczerwinksy Collier County Transportation Planning Department Reviewer's Name &Title: Organization &Telephone Number: Applicant: Applicant's Name: Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc., Attn: William Barton Address: 9393 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Olde Florida Golf Club Location: Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Land Use Type: Single—family &Golf Course ITE Code#: #210Ʈ Proposed number of development units: 554(maximum) Other: Description: CaUse,sy(oemyIDesktop'i21561'377Olde Fonda Golf Club GMF Amendmentiol annirglspeciiicationaonq_guidancelCollie:County TIS Methodology meeting checklist bloc Zoning Existing: A-Agricultural Comprehensive plan recommendation: Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District-Neutral Requested: Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District-Receiving Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study Type: Small Scale TIS E Minor TIS n Major TIS X Study Area: Boundaries: Include links where project traffic at B/O exceeds 2%-2%-3% of adopted LOS standards on area roads Additional intersections to be analyzed: No intersections to be analyzed during initial study, to be determined following a sufficiency review of the initial TIS submittal Horizon Year(s): 2 ?-15)'''" Analysis Time eriod(s): p.m. peak hour Future Off-Site Developments: Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE 9th Ed. Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: X Pass-by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: E+C Assume Vanderbilt Beach Road is NOT extended by time of B/O Methodology &Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates: Site-trip generation: Full build-out assumed to b›.0222.-6.2-2_ Trip distribution method: Based upon current turning movements (VBR @ Collier Blvd) Traffic assignment method: Manual Traffic growth rate: 2%background CAUsers!AperryiDeskrop21561137 7 Ode(bride Golf Club GAP Amerdment lol anningispec3ica lion'agency_ouidancelCo Fier County TIS Methodology meeting checkiioldoc Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: NA Sight distance: NA Queuing: NA Access location &configuration: NA Traffic control: NA Signal system location&progression needs: NA On-site parking needs: NA Data Sources: NA Base maps: NA Prior study reports: TIS for Rezone from GC to A, 2008 Access policy and jurisdiction: NA Review process: NA Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study–No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign-off on the application. SIGNATUR. / — St i y P Marer �.. Re ewers Applicant C:iUsesulperry:Desktop'275E77377 0lde Fbrida Golf CU,COOP Amendment lnt anninosneciticz6onlagency_gataanceiCome;County TIS Melhotlology meeting checklist.doc EXHIBIT A Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review- $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement,including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study"Review-No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation,distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review"-$750 Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of"sufficiency"comments/questions. "Major Study Review"-$1,500 Fee(Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis,review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation,neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review"-$500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the"Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the"Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews"-$500 Fee) Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. ClUse:sylpemv 7esktop2556, ace Florida Golf Club GMP Amendmentolanarno specifcetionaenc_gu,uance{Colite•County il5 Methodology meeting checklistdoc INSERT METHODOLOGY MEETING NOTES HERE Memo Stantec To: John Podczerwinsky, Project From: Matt Crim, P.E., PTOE Manager Stantec Collier County Transportation Planning File: 215611377 Date: April 1, 2013 Reference: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Intersection Analysis The Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Statement, submitted February 2013, evaluated the existing and future roadway network conditions to identify any potential impacts due to the land use change. The initial Traffic Impact Statement submitted did not evaluate any intersections. Per your request, this memo serves to supplement the Traffic Impact Statement by analyzing the AM and PM peak-hour conditions at the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection. Vehicle turning movement counts were conducted at the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection on Tuesday March 19, 2013. The turning movement counts were taken during the AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and the PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) to quantify existing peak-hour conditions. The turning movement counts at the intersection were adjusted by an FDOT peak-season conversion factor of 0.97. The peak-season conversion factors, turning movement counts, and existing signal timing are attached in Appendix A. The existing traffic conditions at the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection were evaluated using the Synchro Software. As part of the analysis, existing lane geometry and signal timing was used at the intersection. Each movement and approach was analyzed to ensure that vehicles did not experience excessive delay and that the volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c ratio) was less than 1.0. The intersection One Team.Infinite Solutions. EXHIBIT J-1 Stantec April 1,2013 Page 2 of 4 Reference: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Intersection Analysis volume tables used to obtain the existing peak-season AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes are provided in Appendix B. The results of the existing traffic Synchro intersection analysis are summarized in Table 1 and indicate that the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection currently operates at an acceptable level-of-service with all movements and approaches having a v/c ratio less than 1.0. The 2013 existing peak-season Synchro intersection worksheets are provided in Appendix C and electronic versions of the files are attached on the accompanying CD. Table 1: Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd 2013 Existing Traffic Intersection Conditions Overall Intersection LOS Delay Max v/c Approach LOS Intersection Time Period - Standard Existing (sec/veh) Ratio EB WB NB SB Vanderbilt Beach Rd AM Peak-Hour E C 25.6 0.85 D C C C &Collier Bluff PM Peak-Hour E C 30.5 0.76 C C D C The Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection was again evaluated for the background traffic conditions in 2022. The background traffic conditions consist of the existing peak-season volumes grown at a two percent annual growth rate. The intersection volume tables used to obtain the background AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes are provided in Appendix B. The results of the background traffic Synchro intersection analysis are summarized in Table 2 and indicate that the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level-of-service with all movements and approaches having a v/c ratio less than 1.0. The 2022 background traffic Synchro intersection worksheets are provided in Appendix D and electronic versions of the files are attached on the accompanying CD. Stantec April 1, 2013 Page 3 of 4 Reference: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Intersection Analysis Table 2: Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd 2013 Background Traffic Intersection Conditions Overall Intersection LOS Delay Max v/c Approach LOS Intersection Time Period - Standard Background (sec/veh) Ratio EB WB NB SB Vanderbilt Beach Rd AM Peak-Hour E D 39.0 0.98 D D D C &Collier Blvd PM Peak-Hour E D 37.1 0.85 I C D D C The Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection was lastly evaluated for the total traffic conditions in 2022. The total traffic conditions consist of the existing peak- season volumes grown at a two percent annual growth rate plus the project traffic. Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the roadway network in the same manner as the Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Statement. However, unlike the Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Statement, 100% of the project traffic (not the net increase above the current entitlement) was analyzed. The estimated project traffic generated by the project based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation — the 9th Edition (2012) is shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3: AM Peak-Hour Trip Generation Development PM Peak Trip Rate/ AM AM AM Peak Total Trips ITE Land Use Category Units Enter Exit Size Equation Total Enter Exit Split Split Single-Family Detached Per Unit 554 T=0.70(x)+ 9.74 25% 75% 398 100 298 Housing-210 Table 4: PM Peak-Hour Trip Generation Development PM Peak Trip Rate/ PM PM PM Peak Total Trips ITE Land Use Category Units Enter Exit Size Equation Total Enter Exit Split Split Single-Family Detached Per Unit 554 In(T)=0.901n(x)+ 0.51 63% 37% 491 309 182 Housing-210 The results of the total traffic Synchro intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5 and indicate that the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level-of-service with all movements and approaches having a v/c ratio less than 1.0. The 2022 total traffic Synchro intersection worksheets are Stantec April 1, 2013 Page 4 of 4 Reference: Olde Florida Golf Club Growth Management Plan Amendment Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Intersection Analysis provided in Appendix E and electronic versions of the files are attached on the accompanying CD. Table 5: Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd 2013 Total Traffic Intersection Conditions Overall Intersection LOS Delay Max v/c Approach LOS Intersection Time Period Standard Total (sec/veh) Ratio EB WB NB SB Vanderbilt Beach Rd AM Peak-Hour E D 42.5 0.99 E D D D &Collier Blvd PM Peak-Hour E D 41.1 0.93 D D D D As the operational analysis documented in this memo indicates, the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard intersection is currently operating at an acceptable level-of- service with all movements and approaches having a v/c ratio less than 1.0. It is anticipated that the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level-of- service with all movements and approaches having a v/c ratio less than 1.0 with the addition of project traffic in 2022. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. / j Matthew Crim, P.E., PTOE Transportation Engineer Ph: 832-523-9111 matt.crim @stantec.com cc: 215611377-220 Attachments: Appendix A: FDOT Peak-Season Conversion Factors, Turning Movement Counts and Existing Signal Timing Appendix B: Existing & Future Intersection Volumes Appendix C: 2013 Existing Traffic Synchro Summary Worksheets Appendix D: 2022 Background Traffic Synchro Summary Worksheets Appendix E: 2022 Total Traffic Synchro Summary Worksheets APPENDIX A FDOT PEAK-SEASON CONVERSION FACTORS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING 2011 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 0300 COLLIER COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.86 WPF,K DATES SF PSCF 01/01/2011 - 01/01/2011 1.01 1.18 2 01/02/2011 - 01/08/2011 0.98 1.14 3 01/09/2011 - 01/15/2011 0.96 1.12 4 01/16/2011 - 01/22/2011 0.93 1.08 * 5 01/23/2011 - 01/29/2011 0.91 1.06 * 6 01/30/2011 - 02/05/2011 0.89 1.04 * 7 02/06/2011 - 02/12/2011 0.87 1.01 * 8 02/13/2011 - 02/19/2011 0.84 0.98 * 9 02/20/2011 - 02/26/2011 0.84 0.98 *10 02/27/2011 - 03/05/2011 0.84 0.98 *11 03/06/2011 - 03/12/2011 0.83 0.97 *12 03/13/2011 - 03/19/2011 0.83 0.97 *13 03/20/2011 - 03/26/2011 0.84 0.98 *14 03/27/2011 - 04/02/2011 0.85 0.99 *15 04/03/2011 - 04/09/2011 0.86 1.00 *16 04/10/2011 - 04/16/2011 0.87 1.01 *17 04/17/2011 - 04/23/2011 0.89 1.04 18 04/24/2011 - 04/30/2011 0.92 1.07 19 05/01/2011 - 05/07/2011 0.95 1.11 20 05/08/2011 - 05/14/2011 0.97 1.13 21 05/15/2011 - 05/21/2011 1.00 1.16 22 05/22/2011 - 05/28/2011 1.02 1.19 23 05/29/2011 - 06/04/2011 1.05 1.22 24 06/05/2011 - 06/11/2011 1.07 1.25 25 06/12/2011 - 06/18/2011 1.10 1.28 26 06/19/2011 - 06/25/2011 1.10 1.28 27 06/26/2011 - 07/02/2011 1.11 1.29 28 07/03/2011 - 07/09/2011 1.11 1.29 29 07/10/2011 - 07/16/2011 1.12 1.30 30 07/17/2011 - 07/23/2011 1.13 1.32 31 07/24/2011 - 07/30/2011 1.13 1.32 32 07/31/2011 - 08/06/2011 1.14 1.33 33 08/07/2011 - 08/13/2011 1.14 1.33 08/14/2011 - 08/20/2011 1.15 1.34 08/21/2011 - 08/27/2011 1.16 1.35 _ . 08/28/2011 - 09/03/2011 1.16 1.35 37 09/04/2011 - 09/10/2011 1.17 1.36 38 09/11/2011 - 09/17/2011 1.18 1.37 39 09/18/2011 - 09/24/2011 1.16 1.35 40 09/25/2011 - 10/01/2011 1.15 1.34 41 10/02/2011 - 10/08/2011 1.13 1.32 42 10/09/2011 - 10/15/2011 1.12 1.30 43 10/16/2011 - 10/22/2011 1.10 1.28 44 10/23/2011 - 10/29/2011 1.09 1.27 45 10/30/2011 - 11/05/2011 1.07 1.25 46 11/06/2011 - 11/12/2011 1.06 1.23 47 11/13/2011 - 11/19/2011 1.04 1.21 48 11/20/2011 - 11/26/2011 1.03 1.20 49 11/27/2011 - 12/03/2011 1.02 1.19 50 12/04/2011 - 12/10/2011 1.01 1.18 51 12/11/2011 - 12/17/2011 1.01 1.18 52 12/18/2011 - 12/24/2011 0.98 1.14 53 12/25/2011 - 12/31/2011 0.96 1.12 * PEAK SEASON 14-FEB-2012 14:41:17 830UPD [1,0,0,1) 10300 PKSEASON.TXT _FTE FTE(Florida Transportation Engineering) Count Name:Vanderbilt Beach Rd Fax#(941)639-4851 at Collier Blvd 8250 Pascal Drive Site Code: Punta Gorda,Florida,United States 33950 Start Date:03/19/2013 Ph#(800)639-4851 Page No:1 Turning Movement Data Collier Blvd Collier Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Time U_ App. U- App. U- App. U- App. Int. Tum Left Thru Right Peds Total Turn Total Thru Right Peds Total Turn Left Thru Right Peds Total Tum Left Thru Right Peds Total Total 7:00 AM 0 77 78 4 0 159 4 12 179 153 0 348 0 22 6 24 0 52 0 5 14 6 0 25 584 7:15 AM 0 104 97 3 0 204 9 8 187 146 0 350 0 28 16 21 1 65 0 4 12 8 0 24 643 7:30 AM 0 136 118 5 0 259 8 6 163 216 0 393 0 29 9 18 0 56 0 2 37 12 0 51 759 7:45 AM 0 124 118 9 0 251 4 11 163 193 0 371 0 31 13 34 0 78 0 3 24 8 0 35 735 Hourly Total 0 441 411 21 0 873 25 37 692 708 0 1462 0 110 44 97 1 251 0 14 87 34 0 135 2721 8:00 AM 1 116 127 4 0 248 7 9 141 182 0 339 0 63 17 28 1 108 0 3 27 9 0 39 734 8:15 AM 0 116 134 7 0 257 11 14 142 166 0 333 0 73 45 29 1 147 _ 0 8 23 21 0 52 789 8:30 AM _ 0 87 148 7 0 242 10 11 149 154 0 324 0 48 14 22 1 84 _ 0 1 13 14 0 28 678 8:45 AM 0 96 109 9 0 214 10 12 154 144 0 320 0 59 23 19 0 101 0 2 12 9 0 23 658 Hourly Total 1 415 518 27 0 961 38 46 586 646 0 1316 0 243 99 98 3 440 0 14 75 53 0 142 2859 "'BREAK'" - 4:00 PM 1 66 172 6 0 245 27 24 182 104 0 337 0 126 18 93 0 237 0 10 20 13 0 43 862 4:15 PM 0 56 147 4 0 207 24 13 158 80 0 275 0 142 18 77 0 235 0 8 23 10 0 41 758 4:30 PM 1 68 158 6 0 233 31 18 196 72 0 317 1 157 12 82 0 252 0 9 20 11 0 40 842 4:45 PM 0 71 168 5 0 244 37 19 172 57 0 285 0 146 22 113 1 281 0 4 18 4 0 26 836 Hourly Total 2 261 645 21 0 929 119 74 708 313 0 1214 1 571 68 365 1 1005 0 31 81 38 0 150 3298 5:00 PM 0 63 160 6 0 229 24 15 129 80 0 248 0 162 17 109 0 288 0 4 22 5 0 31 796 5:15 PM 0 59 205 1 0 265 21 17 177 67 0 282 0 204 5 110 0 319 0 7 22 13 0 42 908 5:30 PM 0 60 168 1 0 229 45 25 152 90 0 312 0 213 28 92 0 333 0 7 31 26 0 64 938 5:45 PM 0 52 147 5 0 204 34 17 132 77 0 260 0 188 11 78 0 277 0 8 25 15 0 48 789 Hourly Total 0 234 680 13 0 927 124 74 590 314 0 1102 0 767 61 389 0 1217 0 26 100 59 0 185 3431 Grand Total 3 1351 2254 82 0 3690 306 231 2576 1981 0 5094 1 1691 272 949 5 2913 0 85 343 184 0 612 12309 Approach% 0.1 36.6 61.1 2.2 - - 6.0 4.5 50.6 38.9 - - 0.0 58.1 9.3 32.6 - - 0.0 13.9 56.0 30.1 - - - Total% 0.0 11.0 18.3 0.7 - 30.0 2.5 1.9 20.9 16.1 - 41.4 0.0 13.7 2.2 7.7 - 23.7 0.0 0.7 2.8 1.5 - 5.0 - Car 3 1305 2141 77 - 3526 299 217 2468 1931 - 4915 1 1652 270 925 - 2848 0 75 333 179 - 587 11876 %Car 100.0 96.6 95.0 93.9 - 95.6 97.7 93.9 95.8 97.5 - 96.5 100.0 97.7 99.3 97.5 - 97.8 - 882 97.1 97.3 - 95.9 96.5 Truck 0 46 113 5 - 164 7 14 108 50 - 179 0 39 2 24 - 65 0 10 10 5 - 25 433 %Truck 0.0 3.4 5.0 6.1 - 4.4 2.3 6.1 4.2 2.5 - 3.5 0.0 2.3 0.7 2.5 - 2.2 - 11.8 2.9 2.7 - 4.1 3.5 Ped - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 5 - - - - - %Ped - - - - 100.0 - FTE FTE(Florida Transportation Engineering) Count Name:Vanderbilt Beach Rd Fax#(941)639-4851 at Collier Blvd 8250 Pascal Drive Site Code: Punta Gorda,Florida,United States 33950 Start Date:03/19/2013 Ph#(800)639-4851 Page No:2 Collier Blvd[N] Out In Total 4271 4915 9186 164 179 343 O 0 0 4435 5094 9529 I 1 I 1 I 1931 2468 217 299 0 50 108 14 7 0 O 0 0 0 0 1981 2576 231 306 0 R T L U P N 1 4 L 0 . _ • tton • .Q O N —m M O ^ S 4— i O p Lr H O A re • co '_ N A 20 o a N N 0 „ I- 4 Ending At 7:00 AM r r- N o 0 c is o " m 3 m a �' a 03/19/2013 6:00 PM o g cc �n a Car n j 8 0 ° -W N o m Truck C o 0 0 0- o °m e N fn Ped —o o N In o. 1:10000— +1 h t r■ UL T R P 3 1305 2141 77 0 O 46 113 5 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 3 1351 2254 82 0 I r I 1 I 3471 3526 6997 142 164 306 O 0 0 3613 3690 7303 Out In Total Collier Blvd[S] Turning Movement Data Plot i' FTE e ,...._. FTE(Florida Transportation Engineering) Count Name:Vanderbilt Beach Rd Fax#(941)639-4851 at Collier Blvd 8250 Pascal Drive Site Code: Punta Gorda,Florida,United States 33950 Start Date:03/19/2013 Ph#(800)639-4851 Page No:3 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM) Collier Blvd Collier Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Time u_ App. U- App. U- App. U- App. let. Turn Left Thru Right Peds Total Turn Left Thru Right Peds Total Turn Left Thru Right Peds Total Turn Left Thru Right Peds Total Total 7:30 AM 0 136 118 5 0 259 8 6 163 216 0 393 0 29 9 18 0 56 0 2 37 12 0 51 759 7:45 AM 0 124 118 9 0 251 4 11 163 193 0 371 0 31 13 34 0 78 0 3 24 8 0 35 735 8:00 AM 1 116 127 4 0 248 7 9 141 182 0 339 0 63 17 28 1 108 _ 0 3 27 9 0 39 734 8:15 AM 0 116 134 7 0 257 _ 11 14 142 166 0 333 0 73 45 29 1 147 _ 0 8 23 21 0 52 789 Total 1 492 497 25 0 1015 30 40 609 757 0 1436 0 196 84 109 2 389 0 16 111 50 0 177 3017 Approach% 0.1 48.5 49.0 2.5 - - 2.1 2.8 42.4 527 - - 0.0 50.4 21.6 28.0 - - 0.0 9.0 62.7 28.2 - - - Total% 0.0 16.3 16.5 0.8 - 33.6 1.0 1.3 202 25.1 - 47.6 0.0 6.5 2.8 3.6 - 12.9 0.0 0.5 3.7 1.7 - 59 - PHF 0.250 0.904 0.927 0.694 - 0.980 0.682 0.714 0.934 0.876 - 0.913 0.000 0.671 0.467 0.801 - 0.662 0.000 0.500 0.750 0.595 - 0.851 0.956 Car 1 471 454 23 - 949 29 33 570 745 - 1377 0 187 84 103 - 374 0 14 107 47 - 168 2868 %Car 100.0 95.7 91.3 92.0 - 93.5 96.7 82.5 93.6 98.4 - 95.9 - 95.4 100.0 94.5 - 96.1 - 87.5 96.4 94.0 - 94.9 95.1 Truck 0 21 43 2 - 66 1 7 39 12 - 59 0 9 0 6 - 15 0 2 4 3 - 9 149 %Truck 0.0 4.3 8.7 8.0 - 6.5 3.3 17.5 6.4 1.6 - 4.1 - 4.6 0.0 5.5 - as - 12.5 3.6 6.0 - 5.1 4.9 Ped - %Ped - - - - 100.0 FTE FTE(Florida Transportation Engineering) Count Name:Vanderbilt Beach Rd 0 Fax#(941)639-4851 at Collier Blvd 8250 Pascal Drive Site Code: Punta Gorda,Florida,United States 33950 Start Date:03/19/2013 Ph#(800)639 4851 Page No:4 Collier Blvd[N] Out In Total 717 1377 2094 56 59 115 0 0 0 773 1436 2209 I 1 � 1 I 745 570 _ 33 29 0 - 12 39 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 757 609 40 30 0 • R T L U P N 1 4 13- __. . 0 . D .. t o V— o O° Peak Hour Data _ (D N O O� O T J S H , j O A J— a o to u. C' 8 V F w N `di . 03/19/2013 7:30 AM -- 0 m m 3 m m M ° a. m o o m H .+ Ending At r m ati s 03/19/2013 8:30 AM o 0' Car u 0 g n 3 M n ° 7 ■ o 0 0 ' 0 -r Mick , c o 0 0 0— m ° °° F. s.; 77, _0 0 cv <v o_ v o 0 0 0- I h t r► U L T R P 1 471 454 23 0 0 21 43 2 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 1 492 497 25 0 I I I I I 688 949 1637 47 66 113 0 0 0 735 1015 1750 Out In Total Collier Blvd[S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) FTE FTE(Florida Transportation Engineering) Count Name:Vanderbilt Beach Rd Fax#(941)639-4851 at Collier Blvd 8250 Pascal Drive Site Code: Punta Gorda,Florida,United States 33950 Start Date:03/19/2013 Ph#(800)639-4851 Page No:5 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Collier Blvd Collier Blvd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Time U- App. U- App. U- App. U- App. Int. Turn Total Thru Right Pods Total Turn Left Thru Right Peds Total Turn Total Thru Right Peds Total Turn Left Thru Right Peds Total Total 4:45 PM 0 71 168 5 0 244 37 19 172 57 0 285 0 146 22 113 1 281 0 4 18 4 0 26 836 5:00 PM 0 63 160 6 0 229 24 15 129 80 0 248 0 162 17 109 0 288 0 4 22 5 0 31 796 5:15 PM 0 59 205 1 0 265 21 17 177 67 0 282 0 204 5 110 0 319 0 7 22 13 0 42 908 5:30 PM 0 60 168 1 0 229 45 25 152 90 0 312 0 213 28 92 0 333 0 7 31 26 0 64 938 Total 0 253 701 13 0 967 127 76 630 294 0 1127 0 725 72 424 1 1221 0 22 93 48 0 163 3478 Approach% 0.0 26.2 72.5 1.3 - - 11.3 6.7 55.9 26.1 - - 0.0 59.4 59 34.7 - - 0.0 13.5 57.1 29.4 - - - Total% 0.0 7.3 202 0.4 - 27.8 3.7 2.2 18.1 8.5 - 32.4 0.0 20.8 2.1 122 - 35.1 0.0 as 2.7 1.4 - 4.7 - PHF 0.000 0.891 0.855 0.542 - 0.912 0.706 0.760 0.890 0.817 - 0.903 0.000 0.851 0.643 0.938 - 0.917 0.000 0.786 0.750 0.462 - 0.637 0.927 Car 0 247 688 13 - 948 127 75 617 289 - 1108 0 720 72 416 - 1208 0 20 91 48 - 159 3423 %Car - 97.6 98.1 100.0 - 98.0 100.0 98.7 97.9 98.3 - 98.3 - 99.3 100.0 98.1 - 98.9 - 90.9 97.8 100.0 - 97.5 98.4 Truck 0 6 13 0 - 19 0 1 13 5 - 19 0 5 0 8 - 13 0 2 2 0 - 4 55 %Truck - 2.4 1.9 0.0 - 2.0 0.0 1.3 2.1 1.7 - 1.7 - 0.7 0.0 1.9 - 1.1 - 9.1 2.2 0.0 - 2.5 1.6 Ped - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 1 - %Ped - - - - 100.0 - - - - - - - - ��FTE FTE(Florida Transportation Engineering) Count Name:Vanderbilt Beach Rd Fax#(941)639-4851 at Collier Blvd 8250 Pascal Drive Site Code: Punta Gorda,Florida,United States 33950 Start Date:03/19/2013 Ph#(800)639-4851 Page No:6 Collier Blvd[N] Out In Total 1583 1108 2691 18 19 37 0 0 0 1601 1127 2728 I 1 I I I 289 617 75 127 0 5 13 1 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 294 630 76 127 0 R T L U P N 1 4 } -,0000D ± � 2J aoat- " 0 `.2 _NN0 JS Peak Hour Data o m 03/19/2013 4.45 PM 0 — ° ° I— Ending At r N o N No u o a 3 CO 03/19/2013 5:45 PM m v Car ,,, ° o - o Truck c o 0 0 0— p o u+ 8 _ m Ped -o o 0 0 °- rl h t r■ O L T R P O 247 688 13 0 O 6 13 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 253 701 13 0 1 1 I 1 I 1053 948 2001 23 19 42 0 0 0 1076 967 2043 Out In Total Collier Blvd[S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:45 PM) 03/27/2013 Programmed EPAC Data 8:24:08 am Intersection Name: Collier @ Vanderbilt Beach Rd Intersection Alias: 951 @VandBch ' -ess Code:9999 Channel:46 Address: 75 Revision:3.33e Access Data Port 2 Comm:19200 Baud lase Data Port 3 Comm:19200 Baud Vehical Basic Timings Vehical Density Timings Time 134 Cars Time To Phase Min_Grn Passage Maxl Max2 Yellow All Red Added Initial Max_Initial Reduction Before Reduce Min_Gap 1 3 1.0 15 20 4.5 2.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 10 1.0 30 40 4.5 2.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 3 1.0 25 35 4.0 2.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 4 7 1.0 25 30 4.0 2.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 5 3 1.0 10 15 4.5 2.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 6 10 1.0 30 40 4.5 2.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 3 1.0 10 15 4.0 2.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 8 7 1.0 25 30 4.0 2.3 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Pedestrian Timing Extended Actuated General Control Miscellaneous No Ped Flashing Ped Rest Non-Act Veh Ped Recall Non Dual Last Car Conditional Simultaneous Phase Walk Clear Walk Clear in Walk Initialize Response Recall Recall Delay Lock Entry Passage Service Gap Out 1 0 0 No 0 No Inactive None None None 0 Yes No No No No 2 7 32 No 0 No Green NonActl Soft None 0 Yes Yes No No No 3 0 0 No 0 No Inactive None None None 0 Yes No No No No 4 7 32 No 0 No Inactive NonActII None None 0 Yes Yes No No No 5 0 0 No 0 No Inactive None None None 0 Yes No No No No 6 7 31 No 0 No Green NonActI Soft None 0 Yes Yes No No No 7 0 0 No 0 No Inactive None None None 0 Yes No No No No 8 7 32 No 0 No Inactive NonActII None None 0 Yes Yes No No No Special Sequence Vehical Detector Phase Assignment 1 fault Data Assigned Switched Phase Mode Phase Extend Delay Vehical Detector Channel:1 1 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:2 2 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:3 3 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:4 4 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:5 5 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:6 6 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:7 7 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:8 8 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:17 1 Veh 0 0.0 0 Vehical Detector Channel:33 0 Veh 0 0.0 15 Vehical Detector Channel:34 0 Veh 0 0.0 30 Vehical Detector Channel:35 0 Veh 0 0.0 10 Vehical Detector Channel:36 0 Veh 0 0.0 25 Vehical Detector Channel:37 0 Veh 0 0.0 15 Vehical Detector Channel:38 0 Veh 0 0.0 30 Vehical Detector Channel:39 0 Veh 0 0.0 10 Vehical Detector Channel:40 0 Veh 0 0.0 25 Pedestrian Detector Special Detector Phase Assignment Default Data Assign Switched Phase Mode Phase Extend Delay Default Data Page 1 of 7 Unit Data General Control Remote Flash Flash Flash Startup Time:6sec Startup State:All Red Red Revert:4sec Test A=Flash No Channel Color Alternat 1 Red No uto Ped Clear:No Stop Time Reset:No Alternate Sequence:0 Flash Flash 2 Yellow No Entry Exit ,BC connector Input Modes:0 Input Output Phase Phase Phase 3 Red Yes ABC connector Output Modes:0 Ring Respons Selection 2 No Yes 4 Red Yes 1 Ring 1 Ring 1 4 Yes No 5 Red No D connector Input Modes: 0 2 Ring 2 Ring 2 6 No Yes 6 Yellow No D connector Output Modes: 0 3 None None 8 Yes No 7 Red Yes 4 None None 8 Red Yes Overlaps I Overlaps I A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Phase(s) A BC D E F G H I J K L M N O P Trail Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trail Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Trail Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Plus Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minus Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ring Phase(s) Next 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Phase Ring Phase 1 2 3 4 1 1 3 3 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 1 24.) 5 5 7 7 2 2 4 4 3 4 1 1 4 o a 6 6 8 8 5 6 7 8 U 1 5 2 6 3 6 2 7 7 2 8 8 2 5 Alternate Sequences Port 1 Data Alternate Sequences BIU Port Message Addr Status 40 0 Used No Phase I Used No Pair(s) 8 Used No 9 Used No 16 Used No No Alternate Sequences Programmed Channel Assignment Control Channel Hardware Pin Set Control Channel Hardware Pin Set Control Channel Hardware Pin Set Ph.1 Veh 1 1 -Ph.1 RYG 1 Ph.2 Veh 2 2-Ph.2 RYG 2 Ph.3 Veh 3 3-Ph.3 RYG 3 Ph.4 Veh 4 4-Ph.4 RYG 4 Ph.5 Veh 5 5-Ph.5 RYG 5 Ph.6 Veh 6 6-Ph.6 RYG 6 Ph.7 Veh 7 7-Ph.7 RYG 7 Ph.8 Veh 8 8-Ph.8 RYG 8 Ph.2 Ped 9 10-Ph.2 DPW 10 Ph.4 Ped 10 12-Ph.4 DPW 12 Ph.6 Ped 11 14-Ph.6 DPW 14 Ph.8 Ped 12 16-Ph.8 DPW 16 Ph.1 OLP 13 17-Ph.1 RYG 17 Ph.2 OLP 14 18-Ph.2 RYG 18 Ph.3 OLP 15 19-Ph.3 RYG 19 Chh.4 OLP 16 20-Ph.4 RYG 20 Ph.1 Ped 17 9-Ph.1 DPW 9 Ph.3 Ped 18 11-Ph.3 DPW 11 .5 Ped 19 13-Ph.5 DPW 13 Ph.7 Ped 20 15-Ph.7 DPW 15 Page 2 of 7 Coordination Data Dial/Split Cycle General Coordination Data / Operation Mode:0–Free Offset Mode:0=Beg Gm Manual Dial: 1 .dination Mode: 0=Permissive Force Mode:0=Plan Manual Split: 1 .imun Mode:2=Max 2 Max Dwell Time:0 Manual Offset: 1 Correction Mode:0–Dwell Yield Period:0 Split Times and Phase Mode Dial / Split Ph. Splits Ph.Mode Ph. Splits Ph.Mode Ph. Splits Ph.Mode Ph. Splits Ph.Mode Traffic Plan Data plan:// Offset Time: Alt.Sequence: Mode: Rg 2 Lag Time: Rg 3 Lag Time: Rg 4 Lag Time: Local TBC Data Source Equate Days Start of Daylight Saving Month:3 Week:2 Cycle Zero Reference Hours:24 Min:0 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 End of Daylight Saving Month: 11 Week: 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 Traffic Data PHASE FUNCTION Event Day Time D/S/O flash 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 1 0:1 0/0/4 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 2 0:1 0/0/4 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 3 2 6:30 1/0/1 {l © © ® © ® ® ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n 4 2 9:0 0/0/4 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 5 2 15:30 1/0/1 C❑ © © ® ® © © ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 6 2 19:0 0/0/4 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LI ❑ ❑ 7 7 0:1 0/0/4 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ AUX. Events Det. Det. Det. Program Aux Ouputs Diag. Rpt. Mult100 Special Function Outputs Event Day Hour Min. I 2 3 DI D2 D3 Dimming 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 1 0 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 8 30 — — — — X 3 1 13 15 4 1 0 1 — — — 5 7 15 30 _ _ _ _ _ _ X 6 7 16 15 Default Data-No Special Day(s)or Week(s)Programmed Special Functions Function SF1 SF2 SF3 SF-4 SF5 SF6 SF7 SF8 Passage 3&Max 3 X Page 3 of 7 Phase Function Phase Function Map PF1 PF2 PF3 PF4 PF5 PF6 PF7 PF8 PF9 PF10 PF11 PF12 PF13 PF14 PF15 PF16 Phase 1 Max2 X n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ se2Max2 ❑ © ❑ -- ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Phase 3 Max2 ❑ n © I I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Phase 4 Max2 ❑ n n X ❑ El= ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Phase 5 Max2 © ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Phase 6 Max2 ❑ ❑❑n ©0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Phase 7 Max2 © n 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ Phase 8 Max2 ❑ n❑ X ❑ ❑ Dimming Data Channel Red Yellow Green Alternate 0000 Default Data-No Dimming Programmed Preemption Data General Preemption Data Ring Min Grn/Walk Time 1 10 1 Ct 2 10 3 10 4 10 Flash>Preepmt 1 Preepmt 2=Preempt 3 Preepmt 4=Preempt 5 Preepmt 1>Preempt 2 Preepmt 3=Preempt 4 Preepmt 5=Preempt 6 '4. Preempt Timers FeSelect Track Return Non- Link to d Dwell Ped Ir 4-: Locking Preempt Delay Extend Duration MaxCall Lock-Out ear Yel Red Grn Ped Yel Red Green Clear Yel Red 1 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 2 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 3 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 4 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 5 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 6 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 10 8 4.0 2.0 Page 4 of 7 Preempt 1 Preempt 2 Preempt 3 Preempt 4 Preempt 5 Preempt 6 Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls C 1 No Yes I No Yes 2 No Yes 2 No Yes 3 No Yes 3 No Yes 4 No Yes 4 No Yes 5 No Yes 5 No Yes 6 No Yes 6 No Yes 7 No Yes 7 No Yes 8 No Yes 8 No Yes Priority Timers Priority Non-Locking Delay Extend Duration Dwell Max_Call Lock-Out Skip Phases 1 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 O=Do not Skip Phases 2 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0=Do not Skip Phases 3 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0=Do not Skip Phases 4 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0=Do not Skip Phases 5 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0=Do not Skip Phases 6 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0=Do not Skip Phases Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Priority 6 Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Exit Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Phase Phase Calls Preempt 1 Vehical Phases Pedestrian Phases Overlaps Ph. Track Dwell Cycle Ph Track Dwell Cycle Ovlp Track Dwell Cycle Default Data Default Data Default Data eempt 2 Pedestrian Phases Overlaps Vehical Phases ph Track Dwell Cycle Ovlt).Track Dwell Cycle Ph. Track Dwell Cycle Default Data Default Data Default Data Preempt 3 Pedestrian Phases Overlaps Vehical Phases ph. Track Dwell Cycle OvI p Track Dwell Cycle Ph. Track Dwell Cycle Default Data Default Data Default Data Preempt 4 Vehical Phases Pedestrian Phases Overlaps Ph. Track Dwell Cycle ph. Track Dwell Cycle Ov�p Track Dwell Cycle Default Data Default Data Default Data Preempt 5 Vehical Phases Pedestrian Phases Overlaps Ph. Track Dwell Cycle Ph. Track Dwell Cycle Ovlp. Track Dwell Cycle Default Data Default Data Default Data Preempt 6 Vehical Phases Pedestrian Phases Overlaps Ph. Track Dwell Cycle Ph. Track Dwell Cycle Ovlp. Track Dwell Cycle Default Data Default Data Default Data Page 5 of 7 System/Detectors Data Local Critical Alarms Revert to Backup: 15 1st Phone: Local Free:No Cycle Failure:No Coord Failure:No Conflict Flash:No Remote Flash:No 2nd Phone: cal Fash:No Cycle Fault:No Coord Fault:No Premption:No Voltage Monitor:No Special Status 1:No Special Status 2:No Special Status 3:No Special Status 4:No Special Status 5:No Special Status 6:No Traffic Responsive System Detector Average Occupancy Min Queue 1 System Weight Queue 2 System Weight Detector Channel Veh/Hr Time(mins) Correction/I0 Volume% Detectors Detectors Factor Detectors Detectors Factor 1 17 1,500 2 10 30 2 18 1,500 2 10 30 Default Data Default Data 3 19 1,500 2 10 30 4 20 1,500 2 10 30 5 21 1,500 2 10 30 6 22 1,500 2 10 30 7 23 1,500 2 10 30 8 24 1,500 2 10 30 Sample Interval: Queue: 1 Input Selection:O=Average Queue: Detector Failed Level:0 Level Enter Leave Dial/Split/Offset Queue:2 Input Selection:0=Average / / Detector Failed Level:0 Default Data Vehical Detector Vehical Detector Special Detector Diagnostic Value 0 Diagnostic Value 1 Diagnostic Value 0 Max No Erratic Max No Erratic Max No Erratic Detector Presence Activity Count Detector Presence Activity Count Detector Presence Activity Count 1 30 180 60 1 30 180 60 2 30 180 60 2 30 180 60 Default Data-No Diag 0 Valu 7 ( 3 180 30 180 60 3 30 180 60 4 180 60 4 30 180 60 s 5 180 180 60 5 30 180 60 6 30 180 60 6 30 180 60 7 30 180 60 7 30 255 60 8 30 180 60 8 30 180 60 9 30 180 60 9 30 180 60 21 30 180 60 21 30 255 60 22 30 180 60 22 30 0 60 23 30 180 60 23 30 255 60 Pedestrian Detector Pedestrian Detector Special Detector Diagnostic Value 0 Diagnostic Value 1 Diagnostic Value 1 Max No Erratic Max No Erratic Max No Erratic Detector Presence Activity Count Detector Presence Activity Count Detector Presence Activity Count 1 5 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 Default Data-No Diag l Values 3 5 0 0 3 5 0 0 4 5 0 0 4 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 6 5 0 0 6 5 0 0 7 5 0 0 7 5 0 0 8 5 0 0 8 5 0 0 Default Data-No Diag 0 Values Default Data-No Diag 1 Values Speed Trap Data Speed Trap Speed Trap S peed Trap: Dial/Split/Offset Low Treshold High Treshold P p: Measurement: // Detector 1 Detector_2 Distance: Default Data Default Data Page 6 of 7 Volume Detector Data Report Interval Volume Controller Detector Detector Number Channel 1 17 2 18 3 19 4 20 5 21 6 22 7 23 8 24 9 25 21 29 22 30 23 31 COP Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B EXISTING AND FUTURE INTERSECTION VOLUMES re N v ° M r` Q' W N r` m u o ^ m c) rn o a- CO m 0 0 m N co 0 co (0 r/) N U) fn m H 0) r� r I- r ° LO (O 1- I- m (C CO o 0) C) CO rn rn o 0 CO o o 03 0 0 0 m N co o W N Ln N 1- ti N N N r- O U O ~ ° M m ti 6 cr) m m w °) o o m CO N O N N u) N CO LO m N• in O N m N O O N m m N cN- d• (n Z O Z N Z Z Z > O m i- r` ti N 1- N CC I- I- m CD ZNi- p v. Z � O D co in Z O O Z t� 0 to U N w 0 ° a J J CO Z o Z N °) o o CO o o m o U) N Z Z In w 0 et Z m ton °� m v rn o ° m m L• .0 > O N . > r- N C.) CO 'O m F' co ~ ao ° O ~ r` ~ C) t` CO ` m ,- O O m O CA O N m 0 CO m N 0 M LL N a- p , ' N N r r r r N I�—/� V/ O w m c J N J o J J r) C m co O co m CO O 0 M CO m CO W m CO CO O a- r N CO M CO U)>Q O W 0 2 co CC = ce 0, r` (o O O O m r` 03 O d) ON r W O O ti N- CO � 0 W N W J ct O O Co) m> Q W co Nr Oo co °) m o o W M M W N. CO cl m o 0 - 0 N d ▪ Co o O rn c J cO N- 0 J 0 o r r` J J LL C ` O (D co 03 0 O) W m (A W O M N 03 0 0 m N 0 N g CO () M (A W • W N N W W N N > O N O O " 02 , ca r 0 `' u c Cn L C.) CC) CO O c vi d C d rt. O c • 7 C) L 0 O O rn 4 O O 0 CI C CCR V p ='a O 6 r_ 0 - = R H o a R c N A N N H C[ c ) il c .5 O U -.+ 'd O CC > O I . O m O U H N C ._ 1_ 1_ c = ° c V 1-a CO g Cl) o C7 • ° o 2 o • 0) U) H , = _E i a '°a x a W ova y ° i i • a.) cY • 0 a a R r- i 4 I- W } Q N Z F I-- 3 CO 0 CC N m N Ce ■ re Ce (m/� N C N CO N Q) O Ln M CO O O O C) O M MS N m H O r- T r ° O o I- I- O o co 00 N O) 0 N O 0 co r- O N 0 U 0 CO N o CO T O Q M N CO LO CO m N CO M W N N m m (1) Z r • Z O N co r Z M M Z Ce M LO Z > _O CO r ti 0 F O ° M M ~ F M co d Z r O Z ° ° '- co CO o 0 co o 0 CO N U 0 U 'A LLI =i Z N co N Z N O O t? 0) Z 0 0 CO N co O N IX N W .24=1 LO LO Z = j Q et j O O mj mj U) Ca 7 ' ' 9 co Q ,g co> = ' CO co O 6 O) mj O N r O j CO j O (�O 1� 'n L �/ d CO C J N- J o J J r co m N Q) r m r 0 0 in m N N CO LO N I-. Q N N N N N N N N N N ci O W 0 C 00 13 W �' r� T 0 c a m N °? CO rn PC) 000 °� m re o o m a) o oo o s W '' O T' W v N W W d J ct U O co m a co 0 W r` °� N r co W ,- .- W °�° a-- U L U.. La r Lf) to o N , c J N to J M a N- o J J o 0 LL r L() CO CO CO N 0 0 m 0 0 M m o o m - o et g cO M rn > W ti O W N r co W W o CO > o t O o A O r rn c LI m d RI D W t th ut C a IL O ,- O _ (� 0 y m 2 0 o N N cUj _ a aci So c �o c o as al ea O > fA O1 ~ U m O` U a+ ,a) d L ~ ~ _ a s c g m c a) o rn L o 'o ~ %� 0 H rn u = co m c a a- .5. w .o U a .R •S m w LL N co c o LL 3 1- I_ a tti W = a W �- Q Y N a Z I- I- ° F 3 °CO N CO N as CC APPENDIX C 2013 EXISTING TRAFFIC SYNCHRO SUMMARY WORKSHEETS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd &Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r vi +ft r vi ++1 ? VI 1+t F Volume(vph) 190 81 106 16 108 49 478 482 24 68 591 734 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 500 0 500 325 300 475 300 425 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 3335 3610 1524 3099 4988 1524 3367 4759 1495 3155 4893 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3335 3610 1524 3099 4988 1524 3367 4759 1495 3155 4893 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 194 194 136 561 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1265 799 774 926 Travel Time(s) 28.8 18.2 17.6 21.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 0% 6% 13% 4% 6% 4% 9% 8% 11% 6% 2% Adj.Flow(vph) 198 84 110 17 112 51 498 502 25 71 616 765 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 198 84 110 17 112 51 498 502 25 71 616 765 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.6 45.6 45.6 9.6 45.6 45.6 Total Split(s) 14.2 49.6 49.6 9.9 45.3 45.3 24.9 56.9 56.9 13.6 45.6 45.6 Total Split(%) 10.9% 38.2% 38.2% 7.6% 34.8% 34.8% 19.2% 43.8% 43.8% 10.5% 35.1% 35.1% Maximum Green(s) 7.9 43.3 43.3 3.6 39.0 39.0 18.3 50.3 50.3 7.0 39.0 39.0 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 8.0 18.5 18.5 3.6 7.8 7.8 18.5 44.8 44.8 6.7 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.20 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.11 0.24 0.14 0.26 0.17 0.72 0.21 0.03 0.30 0.38 0.85 Control Delay 54.5 35.1 1.2 48.4 42.5 1.2 42.3 13.6 0.1 46.2 23.1 17.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.5 35.1 1.2 48.4 42.5 1.2 42.3 13.6 0.1 46.2 23.1 17.3 2013 Existing Traffic Synchro 8 Report AM Peak-Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 J -0' c .4— k I* t 4' 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS D D A D D A D B A D C B Approach Delay 35.4 31.4 27.2 21.2 Approach LOS D C C C Queue Length 50th(ft) 60 21 0 5 23 0 145 60 0 21 95 102 Queue Length 95th(ft) #117 48 0 17 43 0 #232 83 0 45 128 291 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1185 719 694 846 Turn Bay Length(ft) 500 500 325 300 475 300 425 Base Capacity(vph) 294 1748 838 124 2176 774 689 2678 900 247 2135 1006 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.05 0.13 0.14 0.05 0.07 0.72 0.19 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.76 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length:90.4 Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.85 Intersection Signal Delay:25.6 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1:Collier Blvd&Vanderbilt Beach Rd 01 to2 1.03 04 13.651 I -56.96 I 19.9Is 149.6s ■-- oS ac o? o3 14,9s I I '45.6 s I I 142 s'I I _45.3s I I 2013 Existing Traffic Synchro 8 Report AM Peak-Hour Page 2 • Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations II) ++ r 'I) +HL r vi +++ r )1 t++ r Volume(vph) 703 70 411 21 90 47 245 680 13 197 611 285 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 500 0 500 325 300 475 300 425 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 3467 3610 1583 3213 5085 1615 3433 5085 1615 3467 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3467 3610 1583 3213 5085 1615 3433 5085 1615 3467 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 251 178 175 306 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1265 799 774 926 Travel Time(s) 28.8 18.2 17.6 21.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 0% 2% 9% 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 1% 2% 2% Adj.Flow(vph) 756 75 442 23 97 51 263 731 14 212 657 306 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 756 75 442 23 97 51 263 731 14 212 657 306 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.6 45.6 45.6 9.6 45.6 45.6 Total Split(s) 32.0 67.2 67.2 10.1 45.3 45.3 16.0 47.0 47.0 15.7 46.7 46.7 Total Split(%) 22.9% 48.0% 48.0% 7.2% 32.4% 32.4% 11.4% 33.6% 33.6% 11.2% 33.4% 33.4% Maximum Green(s) 25.7 60.9 60.9 3.8 39.0 39.0 9.4 40.4 40.4 9.1 40.1 40.1 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 25.8 36.1 36.1 3.8 7.7 7.7 9.4 20.7 20.7 9.1 20.4 20.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.23 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.05 0.56 0.17 0.22 0.17 0.73 0.62 0.03 0.60 0.56 0.51 Control Delay 35.6 19.6 13.1 46.5 40.3 1.2 52.6 33.1 0.1 47.2 32.3 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 35.6 19.6 13.1 46.5 40.3 1.2 52.6 33.1 0.1 47.2 32.3 6.7 2013 Existing Traffic Synchro 8 Report PM Peak-Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 s _ t 4— k 4\ t t \* 1 '1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS D B B D D A D C A D C A Approach Delay 26.9 29.5 37.7 28.3 Approach LOS C C D C Queue Length 50th(ft) 195 12 65 6 18 0 74 134 0 59 119 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #323 33 209 21 38 0 #148 179 0 #106 161 62 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1185 719 694 846 Turn Bay Length(ft) 500 500 325 300 475 300 425 Base Capacity(vph) 1001 2470 1162 137 2229 808 362 2309 828 354 2291 881 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.76 0.03 0.38 0.17 0.04 0.06 0.73 0.32 0.02 0.60 0.29 0.35 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 140 Actuated Cycle Length:89.3 Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.76 Intersection Signal Delay:30.5 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. • Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1:Collier Blvd&Vanderbilt Beach Rd 401 tot Co3 —4'04 ( ;47s I 1U ' [ 67.26 I I I 05 ■ o6 v- 4—o3 14:46.7$ I I '32s I I '45.3s I • 2013 Existing Traffic Synchro 8 Report PM Peak-Hour Page 2 APPENDIX D 2022 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC SYNCHRO SUMMARY WORKSHEETS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd &Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11 r 11) 4,41, r 'Pill 1,+1 1 )i 1t+ r Volume(vph) 227 97 127 19 129 59 571 576 29 81 706 877 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 500 0 500 325 300 475 300 425 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 3335 3610 1524 3099 4988 1524 3367 4759 1495 3155 4893 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3335 3610 1524 3099 4988 1524 3367 4759 1495 3155 4893 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 168 168 118 *438 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1265 799 774 926 Travel Time(s) 28.8 18.2 17.6 21.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 0% 6% 13% 4% 6% 4% 9% 8% 11% 6% 2% Adj. Flow(vph) 236 101 132 20 134 61 595 600 30 84 735 914 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 236 101 132 20 134 61 595 600 30 84 735 914 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.6 45.6 45.6 9.6 45.6 45.6 Total Split(s) 16.0 48.6 48.6 12.7 45.3 45.3 30.0 70.1 70.1 18.6 58.7 58.7 Total Split(%) 10.7% 32.4% 32.4% 8.5% 30.2% 30.2% 20.0% 46.7% 46.7% 12.4% 39.1% 39.1% Maximum Green(s) 9.7 42.3 42.3 6.4 39.0 39.0 23.4 63.5 63.5 12.0 52.1 52.1 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 9.7 19.6 19.6 6.0 8.6 8.6 23.4 67.0 67.0 8.5 52.1 52.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.20 0.56 0.56 0.07 0.44 0.44 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.17 0.34 0.13 0.37 0.23 0.90 0.23 0.03 0.38 0.34 0.98 Control Delay 85.0 46.1 5.6 56.5 55.9 2.0 65.7 13.8 0.1 57.7 23.1 42.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 85.0 46.1 5.6 56.5 55.9 2.0 65.7 13.8 0.1 57.7 23.1 42.3 2022 Background Traffic Synchro 8 Report AM Peak-Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 - — c 1— 4\ t r' \ 1 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS F D A E E A E B A E C D Approach Delay 54.3 40.7 38.7 34.9 Approach LOS D D D C Queue Length 50th(ft) 94 33 0 7 36 0 233 81 0 32 135 439 Queue Length 95th(ft) #171 67 32 21 59 0 #343 112 0 58 172 #776 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1185 719 694 846 Turn Bay Length(ft) 500 500 325 300 475 300 425 Base Capacity(vph) 270 1276 647 165 1626 610 658 2664 889 316 2131 936 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.87 0.08 0.20 0.12 0.08 0.10 0.90 0.23 0.03 0.27 0.34 0.98 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 119.6 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.98 Intersection Signal Delay:39.0 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min) 15 User Entered Value # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1:Collier Blvd&Vanderbilt Beach Rd 18.6s I 170.ls , 1 12,74 48.6s I I 30s I 158.7s I 116s 11 45.36 I I 2022 Background Traffic Synchro 8 Report AM Peak-Hour Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 * I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )IPi tt r vii ttt r vivi ttt r » ttt r Volume(vph) 840 84 491 25 108 56 293 813 16 235 730 341 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 500 0 500 325 300 475 300 425 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 3467 3610 1583 3213 5085 1615 3433 5085 1615 3467 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3467 3610 1583 3213 5085 1615 3433 5085 1615 3467 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 267 166 164 367 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1265 799 774 926 Travel Time(s) 28.8 18.2 17.6 21.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 0% 2% 9% 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 1% 2% 2% Adj. Flow(vph) 903 90 528 27 116 60 315 874 17 253 785 367 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 903 90 528 27 116 60 315 874 17 253 785 367 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.6 45.6 45.6 9.6 45.6 45.6 Total Split(s) 39.0 74.0 74.0 10.3 45.3 45.3 19.0 47.2 47.2 18.5 46.7 46.7 Total Split(%) 26.0% 49.3% 49.3% 6.9% 30.2% 30.2% 12.7% 31.5% 31.5% 12.3% 31.1% 31.1% Maximum Green(s) 32.7 67.7 67.7 4.0 39.0 39.0 12.4 40.6 40.6 11.9 40.1 40.1 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 32.9 42.8 42.8 4.0 9.4 9.4 12.5 27.7 27.7 11.9 27.1 27.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.25 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.06 0.67 0.23 0.26 0.21 0.79 0.67 0.03 0.66 0.62 0.55 Control Delay 45.5 23.3 19.0 58.8 48.4 1.6 63.1 38.7 0.1 56.9 38.0 6.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 45.5 23.3 19.0 58.8 48.4 1.6 63.1 38.7 0.1 56.9 38.0 6.6 2022 Background Traffic Synchro 8 Report PM Peak-Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 C 4\ t / d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS D C B ED A ED A ED A Approach Delay 35.0 35.9 44.5 33.2 Approach LOS C D D C Queue Length 50th(ft) 290 21 153 9 27 0 107 194 0 85 171 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #523 44 323 27 51 0 #222 265 0 #165 237 73 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1185 719 694 846 Turn Bay Length(ft) 500 500 325 300 475 300 425 Base Capacity(vph) 1058 2282 1098 120 1852 693 397 1927 714 385 1904 822 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.85 0.04 0.48 0.23 0.06 0.09 0.79 0.45 0.02 0.66 0.41 0.45 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 107.9 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.85 Intersection Signal Delay:37.1 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: +1:Collier Blvd&Vanderbilt Beach Rd �ol 1 o2 1v3 X04 Q5 • o6 Q7 Q8 19s I [ •• s I I 39 s I I 45.36 2022 Background Traffic Synchro 8 Report PM Peak-Hour Page 2 APPENDIX E 2022 TOTAL TRAFFIC SYNCHRO SUMMARY WORKSHEETS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd &Vanderbilt Beach Rd � 3/29/2013 j -a* - , c 1- /l T P \► 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi tt r vivi +fit r vivi +++ r vivi 11i, r Volume(vph) 227 133 127 55 236 214 571 576 41 133 706 877 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 500 0 500 325 300 475 300 425 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 3335 3610 1524 3099 4988 1524 3367 4759 1495 3155 4893 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3335 3610 1524 3099 4988 1524 3367 4759 1495 3155 4893 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 168 223 118 `438 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1265 799 774 926 Travel Time(s) 28.8 18.2 17.6 21.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 0% 6% 13% 4% 6% 4% 9% 8% 11% 6% 2% Adj. Flow(vph) 236 139 132 57 246 223 595 600 43 139 735 914 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 236 139 132 57 246 223 595 600 43 139 735 914 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 • Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.6 45.6 45.6 9.6 45.6 45.6 Total Split(s) 16.0 48.6 48.6 12.7 45.3 45.3 30.0 70.1 70.1 18.6 58.7 58.7 Total Split(%) 10.7% 32.4% 32.4% 8.5% 30.2% 30.2% 20.0% 46.7% 46.7% 12.4% 39.1% 39.1% Maximum Green(s) 9.7 42.3 42.3 6.4 39.0 39.0 23.4 63.5 63.5 12.0 52.1 52.1 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 9.7 18.1 18.1 6.3 12.2 12.2 23.4 65.1 65.1 10.4 52.1 52.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.19 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.42 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.26 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.64 0.93 0.24 0.05 0.52 0.36 0.99 Control Delay 91.5 49.2 5.7 64.0 56.1 15.2 71.7 16.4 0.1 61.6 25.0 46.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 91.5 49.2 5.7 64.0 56.1 15.2 71.7 16.4 0.1 61.6 25.0 46.9 2022 Total Traffic Synchro 8 Report AM Peak-Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 —. -*V c 4— 4\ t t 1 " Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS F D A E E B E B A E C D Approach Delay 57.6 39.6 42.5 39.1 Approach LOS E D D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 97 53 0 23 69 0 242 91 0 55 143 467 Queue Length 95th(ft) #181 86 31 47 98 77 #368 127 0 91 187 #815 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1185 719 694 846 Turn Bay Length(ft) 500 500 325 300 475 300 425 Base Capacity(vph) 262 1239 633 160 1579 634 639 2516 845 307 2069 922 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.11 0.21 0.36 0.16 0.35 0.93 0.24 0.05 0.45 0.36 0.99 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 123.2 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.99 Intersection Signal Delay:42.5 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min) 15 * User Entered Value # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1:Collier Blvd&Vanderbilt Beach Rd \o_ t 2 I__ —1•:.- 18.6 s .1 70.1 s I I 12,74 -48.6s i • 1 c- -.E 30s i I 58.7 s I 116 s I I 45.3 s I I 2022 Total Traffic Synchro 8 Report AM Peak-Hour Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 c '- 4\ t t 1 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations vivi Tt r )j jff r vivi +41, r vi ttt r Volume(vph) 840 195 491 47 173 151 293 813 53 396 730 341 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length(ft) 500 0 500 325 300 475 300 425 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length(ft) 100 100 100 100 Lane Util.Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(prot) 3467 3610 1583 3213 5085 1615 3433 5085 1615 3467 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow(perm) 3467 3610 1583 3213 5085 1615 3433 5085 1615 3467 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd.Flow(RTOR) 289 166 164 367 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 1265 799 774 926 Travel Time(s) 28.8 18.2 17.6 21.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 0% 2% 9% 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 1% 2% 2% Adj.Flow(vph) 903 210 528 51 186 162 315 874 57 426 785 367 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 903 210 528 51 186 162 315 874 57 426 785 367 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.3 45.3 45.3 9.6 45.6 45.6 9.6 45.6 45.6 Total Split(s) 37.0 70.1 70.1 12.2 45.3 45.3 20.7 46.7 46.7 21.0 47.0 47.0 Total Split(%) 24.7% 46.7% 46.7% 8.1% 30.2% 30.2% 13.8% 31.1% 31.1% 14.0% 31.3% 31.3% Maximum Green(s) 30.7 63.8 63.8 5.9 39.0 39.0 14.1 40.1 40.1 14.4 40.4 40.4 Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time(s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time(s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 31.0 39.0 39.0 5.9 11.2 11.2 14.2 27.5 27.5 14.5 27.8 27.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.25 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.16 0.71 0.30 0.36 0.52 0.71 0.69 0.11 0.93 0.61 0.55 Control Delay 55.7 26.7 20.4 58.6 48.6 13.0 57.3 40.7 0.4 76.9 38.7 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.7 26.7 20.4 58.6 48.6 13.0 57.3 40.7 0.4 76.9 38.7 6.7 2022 Total Traffic Synchro 8 Report PM Peak-Hour Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Collier Blvd & Vanderbilt Beach Rd 3/29/2013 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS E C C ED B ED A ED A Approach Delay 40.6 35.4 43.0 41.6 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 307 54 148 17 45 0 107 199 0 150 175 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) #582 94 317 44 76 60 #215 280 0 #321 248 75 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1185 719 694 846 Turn Bay Length(ft) 500 500 325 300 475 300 425 Base Capacity(vph) 974 2108 1044 173 1815 683 443 1867 696 457 1881 816 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.10 0.51 0.29 0.10 0.24 0.71 0.47 0.08 0.93 0.42 0.45 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 110.3 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:0.93 Intersection Signal Delay:41.1 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1:Collier Blvd&Vanderbilt Beach Rd 01 1102 ■ 03 X04 Ai:- ......,, 1 . r it: .. .�.. . . ,..: ,.:..., f .zt I .70.1s �-- 05 Oo 07 03 20.7s 1 147s,. 1 I 37s 1 I 45.3s . I I 2022 Total Traffic Synchro 8 Report PM Peak-Hour Page 2 Exhibit K Dw 0I 739590 I993SEP 13 aN 908 1864 000840 COLLIER COUNTY RECORDED OR BOOK PAGE! • 60 Roc.lved $13,g/6 bece,lenttry Stekap Tax•/a. X31.7 b/,ore Received$ Personal PrnpertyyTax ,, . IDm )lQ 1 0003 DWIGHT E. Of ai pri7 COURT INT....- IND�— l3tasaea PI TIN sr ISpace Above This Line Per Rmo Special Warranty Deed This Indenture, Medethis 9 day of September,1993 A.D.. Between OFC OF NAPLES, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the state of FLORIDA ord:gem:yof COLLIER same Florida ,grafbtor, and OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the state of FLORIDA whoagauereurs3800 Airport-Pulling Rd., NAPLES, Florida 33942 of the County of COLLIER , sum of Florida ,grantee. Witnesseth that the GRANTOR,for and in consideration of the me of DOLLARS TEN & NO/l00($10.00) end odor good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR in brad paid by GRANTEE. the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,has Mated,bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S =censors and assigns forever. the following described land, situate.lying and belog in the county of Collier Sam of town. (LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT 'A" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HERE.- SUBJECT TO: i R CQy) 1. Grantee's = ption of that - "=in mortgage dated October 31, 1989, re .rded in O.R. Book 1• :0, ommencing at Page 1789, Public Re •rd .4 o - Cou , Fl,ri•=, as modified by a certain Loan M•• fi A•reem- date. J ne 15, 1992 and recorded in O.•. 17 .-- c.lmnenc n• at Pa•e 1749, Public Records of Col ier e•• 2. Zonin• r l.f`ons .os"d •y governmental authorities; .� tom'", 3. Taxes i• the year of t.,-- sf-r - . all subsequent years; ,t' 4. All right= ©h• claims exist'i -- of the time of i � •ntinue. _ -ched) Together with all tenements.headhamo • id .: • ..'.. : la anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the tame in i"t!li' And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that awfully seized of said and in fee simple: that grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; tint grantor hereby fully warrants the tide to said lad and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons canting by,through or under grantor. In Witness Whereof, the grantor has hereunto set his had and seal the day and year first above wtima. S sealed and delivered in our presence: OFC OF NAPLES, INC. Li.(166l6Lt X.:TM(d(ii By: - - t: t---$-� (soil Printed Name:T..99rd.lt K•.TBol�' W CLYDE C. QfuINBY, President Witness #1;_� s_- _ 11 P.O.Address ROD Aitpon•Pulling Rd.,NAPLES.FL 33942 prin�ame/:(�/u(/H, V MARAle LL Witness #2 STATE OF FLORIDA (Corporate seal) COUNTY OF COLLIER day of September, 19 93 by The foregoing insuumeet was ecknowledgd before ne this CLYDE C. QUINSY, President of OFC O NAPLES, INC.,FCORIDA Corporation. ; on behalf of dm=potation.He is persomlly known to me ovdrorpndurd-dr 1 This Document Prepared By: ��� / . CJ ( ��� Maly A.MuseU.Esq. Printed Name: �!A !� �Rwllr.! YOUNG.VAN ASSENDERP.VARNADOE&BENTON,P.A. ROI LAUREL GAY DRIVE,SUITE 3D Y PUBLIC DEBORAH K..plp IDmr a Wien Eaphna NAPLES,PL 33967-oral I g ga MM Air .; E&Dtaator29.WA OLDE FL—BANCFLA 1 !1-. rt.r; hka a: C ;e, x` ,°7 ',.",•,,•.• s"''8.°° w3Gi - • I speciai,warranty Deed - Page 2 18 8 4 0 0 0 8 4 1 UR BOOK s, 1 conveyance pertaining to access to, or the use of, the Phase I Club Facilities or to membership in the Olde Florida Golf Club; 5, Any and all encumbrances or liens, easements, dedications, agreements, licenses, restrictions, rights-of-way and other matters now applicable to the Phase I Real Property or hereafter granted, imposed, or suffered to be placed upon such property by predecessors in title in connection with the use of the Phase I Real Property as recreational facilities; 6. Any mortgage(s) that may encumber or be placed upon the Phase I Real Property in connection with the acquisition thereof and/or the construction of the Phase I Club Improvements thereon; 7. Reservation of oil, gas and mineral rights originally • reserved in those certain Deeds recorded in Deed Book 30, page 91 and Deed Book 41, page 2456; and conveyed to Oleum O.R. Book 160,Florida 39,corporation the Book 160, of eCollier 1 County, Florida. B. Any lien of claim of lien for services, labor or material which may take priority by reason of the Notice of Commencement recorded in O.R. Book 1824, page 1632, of the Public Records of Collier T i��� c�V CY � � py e...) (IIC 0 ... . \,,,... , -,if,-, A__, fi OB ECIRC ' F i • • • ......__. „ l ^.,,('. .v -.iY..may—•N:.t.w:"'>pgQ:'�'.r".^.• • 186k • 0 0 0 8 k 2 N,Y f. WILSON,MILLER,BARTON&PEA 6K PkOE4 -�--" snow"Plennen,sutsayom,lendrape A,ddteeu,environmental Consumnu a Contr.:Won Menagen !' '. Wa•a ihdndrel emnr,sealam•39009aerunee Aram Real•NON.Maim awn•am dame eu pm watts Description of Old Florida Golf Club Phase i being a part of Section 31,Township 48 South. Range 27 East,Collier County,Florida All that part of Section 31,Towmhip 48 South,Range 27 East,Collier County,Florida,being more particularly described as follows; - BEGINNING at the southwest corner of Section 31,Township 48 South,Range 27 East; thence along the west line of said Section 31,North 01.09'24'West 171.66 feet; thence leaving said west line North 88'50'36'East 127.49 feet; thence North 68.11'27'East 312.23 feet; thence South 83'37'40'East 1074.79 feet; thence Nonh 12.38'39'East 90.52 feet; thence North 74'34'44'West 439.84 feet; - thence North 89'59'36'West 538.03 feet; thence North 47'3240'West 324.00 feet; thence North 29'27'34'West 131.44 feet; thence North 06'47'28'West 278.30 feet; thence North 85•09'12'East 1615.99 feet; thence North 04'50'48'West 250.00 feet; thence North 89'57'58'East 940.00 feet; thence Noah 22•40'09'East 580.00 feet; thence North 32•24•35'West 831.83 feet; thence North 07'23.02 West 1884.92 feet; thence North 24'30'12'East 230.40 feet; thence North 63'03'47'East 78.78 feet; thence South 60'24'49'East 68.67 feet; thence South 6973'20'East 178.33 feet; thence South 66'45'S4'East 103.57 feet; thence South 41'21'25'East 58.77 feet; I thence South 09'23'59'East 146.74 feet; thence South 60'56'19'Eau 161.95 feet; ......._. thence South 86'10'30'East 169.68 feet; thence South 65047'35'East 108.59 feel; � R CO thence South 61.42'19'East 160.73 fe thence South 51'09'20'East 246.90 _ thence South 17.08'46'East 135`..• . thence South 03.30'20'East 1 thence South 36°22'19'Fast 3'thence South 0I'2119'W- 193. f ; thence South 20.43'56'W_•57, fee - _ thence North 89'21'53' 13.49 feet; thence South 0078'07' t•r•,thence North 87.40'00• t 1 n e� s,�j coon 1; thence along the eauIln of set n3,•• 39 3 the south-t corner of sold Secton 3; �,est 513 1 '•'nt thence along the south 1'. • „000 S 7''S.`of Heginldng of the p �/eontnining 254.84 acres more or - ,,,,,,,,,,���))) • subject to ensements and resuk nod;bearings are based on the south lin 1 Section 31,being South 87• - �,o...JJJ WILSON,MILLER,BARTON&P• •? • C BY i . ,.. 1. 3i> ,t✓Y,_:.c is C ;4'in-ufh°vQr`.°`:e . Micheal C. um,P.L.S.14247 5:1•11.1-..•:41.1•-n..-10-.:; •- ; , Not valid unless embossed with the Professional's seal. ,"7i�rk „"•:�F;• W.O. 15773 ..r;,•'' ee-acre' . Ref: 4L-1097 GEB:kjd) EXHIBIT "A" Date: August 27,1993 In Off ed and Yerif fed • D In Official Records of COLLIER CONITT• FLORIDA I • OliEBT E.MOCK, CLERK •77 ot0010AN 1 Lakeland Napfee Ford Myer Sarasota out)swot pint ur9�oro 013939-IO79 pW771J69D �.,pinaesesr! F01313194M Fort FvnWn3r1Aas3 ,s<h i•n• >•u'a-'`r°yr"--•' 't L•.u. , Or x"k u - , i y sir; 'i r i IY ,',rcy y # =a v. .•'.'.. .4. Sit :+ ,• ;.q;"4g0k. ei ' .° �" i.� $r `' ,ice " ' �,4 ;,r;'-'• u y"+ 4 ,a r rz �* 'YES r' 7s s0)"+ +s,�"1 y u fi � . n-,•3-..,: :,-2,..•::,-., la*a0.t?. x.3 t. - t• err fi x �}?i•-!'4.'}t,rlYeA{ ;1t11__ Ay'tt(- Z ,�1. "• 4: 'O'.Y. Gal 47`r' *#wit`` ,•sit,}. i d h_ tivsy t Q t L?�f °3 " r 1 • les r--4 ez ! . T - i^' ktt,'",---ni/ y7' i,•.:-.....:::"-:.'..' : .+..:1cS��1- 2221583 OR: 2343 PG: 1152 ♦. MOOD is OM= Ncotl1 of COUln COW, 11 H/13/S1 at H:S111 NM 1. UOR, CUM 1) 171G(f JC PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: COO MOWN De 111 IS.N Doug(*.lank,Esq. IOC-.11 15/51.11 Gunter,Yoakley.Valdes-Fauli&Stewart,P.A. hts: Phillips Point,Suite 500 East hts: t011Y1 ft u 777 South Flagter Drive 111 1 man u BIN Post Ott' Box 4587 AUilthtig$111d:l'!~71M197—.299036 West Palm Beach,Florida 33402-4587 ME 21 1997 4R8 9948 P9 1418 i it111it.i.ili31131iiIill VI Parcel ID No Can 21 2503 000.00 n Grantee's SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is made this'd lay of August 1997,by OFC OF NAPLES, INC., a Florida corporation("fir"), to OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation("�ntee"),the mailing address of which is 9393 Vanderbilt Road Ext.,Naples, Florida 34120. - Corr. (� ,' TNES •.� That Grantor, for • in o , '• ' • um o DOLLARS($10.00)and other good and valuable consi•- . ;o ,the rece • • ereby''a't'•wledged,grants,bargains and sells to Grantee all of i . ce C ` . c^`ier ounty, Florida("Premises"), which is more particular! de' - f !1 : Z r SEE EXHIBIT"A' '` ' ACHED HERET•')4 D • Ii` ' PART HEREOF. TO HAVE AND TO ` al .r' •• ' same in f ' . orever, subject to all restrictions, reservations,covenants and easem , 6, .4 .>�_ •t-a�'� ° •;taxes and assessments for the year 1997 and years subsequent thereto; :. e�14. . . '0 ations and restrictions imposed by any governmental authorities,and matters which would be disclosed by a current and accurate survey and inspection of the Premises, GRANTOR does hereby covenant with Grantee that at the time of delivery of this Deed the Premises were free from all encumbrances made by Grantor, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons,claiming by,through or under Grantor,but against none other. Note: This document was erroneously recorded in Palm Beach County,Florida • ORB 9948 Ps 1419 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day and the year first above written. Signed,sealed and delivered in the presence of: OFC OF NAPLES, INC., a Florida corporation rilid—g ) By: _____ SOure of Wp T. • • J. ukk,President kert E cZny N e of Wi (CORPORATE SEAL) Signature ofitness '5 1>d10.__ GI ("t.'..).-Al - Printed Name of Witness State of Ohio Q�.V �' County of Sutton �' -� The foregoing'• ,, • was ac . --• ed be re me •' 'ict.day of 1..•, •t 1997,by Toomas J.Kukk,the Presi' •t •C . ` • it�•� ,ri• . corporation,on behalf of the corporation M as identification. CO On and �� •,: • o 117:= . �� No'. ittivc-State of Ohio e'' O w E Ci�. •1 _ z c. • sill ,No. 276229.1 KIN AYAM I r N.I.,,haft$%SMd ow e:• Naetmin•a.stgOOI '.•'�;. w , 11 . .. . . ORB 9948 P9 14 0 DOROTHY H. WILKENt CLERK PE COUNTY, FL EXHIBIT"A" Legal Description All of Section 31,Township 48 South, Range 27 East, less the East half of the Northeast quarter thereof,Collier County,Florida, And Less: All that part of Section 31,Township 48 South, Range 27 East. Collier County. Florida.being more particularly described as follows; BEOINNINC at the southwest corner of Section 31,Township 48 South,Range 27 East; thence along the west line of said Section 31. North 01'0914'West 171.66 feet; thence leaving said west sins North 88'30'36'East 127.49 feet; thence North 61'1117'East 312.23 feet; . thence South 1317'40'East 1074.79 feet; thence North 12'3119'East 90.32 feet; thence North 74'34'44'West 439.14 feet: thence North 19'5916'West 531.03 feet; ' thence North 47'32'40'West 324.00 f- 1-3,--N f 7 T thence North 29'27'34'West 131. t jv thence North 06'47.28'West 2 r thence North 83'09'12'East . M.�r'r"; -r-^ thence North 04'30'41•W-• : ' feet: thence Norris 19•3758' . . . ,., thence North 22•40'09' . .. 3 .,, themes North 32'24.33' est 1.83 feet; • so thence North 07'23'02' ear .','.*4 , s► thence N o r t h 24'30'12 East; , 0 f P -: tt� thence North 63'03'47 East t feet t., I O thence Sends 60'24'49' :: ` VV �+ thence South 69.33'20' :II' 78. - • LYy thence South 66'45'54' '1•• , 37 feet; �` thence South 41'21'23' ,Mw t. feet; W thence South 09'23'39' . . 4 feet; dm thence South 60'56'19'East ; tea thence South 6610•30'Est 1. .®f y � �`\►- .y thence South 65'4733'Eau 101.. 21 thence South 61'42'19'East 160.73 CI vs-- thence South 31'0910'East 246.90 feet; , r thence South 17'08'46'East 135.69 feet; sot thence South 05'30'20'East 174.19 feet; am thence South 36'22'19'East 85.39 feet; thence South 01'2819'West 193.59 feet; s► thence South 20.43'36'West 37.31 feet; a* thence North 19'21'53'East 132.49 feet; thence South 00'38'07'East 600.72 feet; thence North 87'40'00'East 1319.77 feet to a point on the east 114 corner of said Section 31; thence along the east limo/said Seaton 31,South 00'3913'East 2612.33 feet to the southeast corner of said Section 31; thence along the south line of said Section 31.South 87.55'34'West 5136.08 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described; containing 254.84 acres more or less; subject to easements and restrictions of record; beatings are based on the south line of said Section 3!.being South 87.55'34'West. Ai..;rt _ '.'"` .c•;9.:.ty of document • .. .._./ 4:1c a received. C C C Exhibit L Olde Florida Golf Club EQUITY MEMBERS (209) as of 2/13/13 rLast Name First Name Mbr# ANDERSEN GARY 162 ARNOLD L. MICHAEL 321 ARNOS RICHARD 43 !BAG LEY JOHN 176 BAIRD DONALD"RICK" 86 BAIRD JAMES 206 BARRETT TOM 45 BARTON WILLIAM 6 BAUGHMAN JOSEPH 271 BAUMAN WILLIAM 261 BEATTY JAMES 269 BENDER ESTATE OF ROBERT 67 BERINGER JOHN 170 BEVEVINO FRANK 243 BIBBO JOHN 336 BLANCATO JOSEPH 87 BLATZ KARL 198 BLICKLE JOHN 49 BOUCHARD JAMES 327 BOWLIN JOHN 296 BREEDEN DANIEL 286 BRENNAN MICHAEL 128 BRENNAN DAVID 226 BROCKSMITH JR JAMES 164 BUNGERT MICHAEL 311 BUTLER BERNARD 64 CASTELLANO WILLIAM _ 62 CHERNEY EDWARD 14 CLOSE KIM 376 COLEN DR STEPHEN 267 COLLINS JOHN 297 COX CHARLES 252 COX JOHN 355 CRAIG DICK 95 CRAIG TOM 137 CULLIGAN ELIZABETH 293 D'ANTONI DAVID 330 DELANEY CHRIS 24 DELUCA JAMES 157. DEROMED_I ROGER 333 DIDION JAMES 147 DILLON DONALD 309 - Olde Florida Golf Club ,, EQUITY MEMBERS (209)as of 2/13/13 Last Name First Name Mbr# DITKA MICHAEL 4 DITKA DIANA 55 DONAHUE THOMAS 133 DUNLAP STEPHEN 189 DURKIN WILLIAM 369 DUSTHIMER THOMAS 188 EATON,JR EDWIN 365 ELKIN TOM 357 ENOCH JR PAUL 132 FAGA ANTONIO 88 FAHEY THOMAS 359 FERGUSON THOMAS 20 FLODEEN WENDALL(BUD) 306 FOX WILLIAM 182 FREEMAN ESTATE OF J RICHARD 201 FRENCH STEPHEN 368 FRITZ WILLIAM 352 FULLER JON 145 GARVIN DAVID 216 GILLETT WILLIS 263 GOLDSTONE STEVEN 292 HAAG ESTATE OF JOHN 249 HAIMBAUGH ESTATE OF CONSTANCE 85 HARDING JOHN 364 HARRISON EDWIN 367 HARTMAN JAMES 233 HAYES ROBERT 275 HENRY FRANK 108 HINDMAN BARRY 103 HIPP RAYMOND 58 HOLDEN JAMES 299 HOLMES JOSEPH 254 HOPP DIETMAR 300 HOUSE E. MICHAEL 350 HUDSON CRAIG 192 JANOSEK JAMES 172 JARVIS — _ FREDERICK 81 JOHNS THOMAS 278 JOHNSON JR DR VINCENT 48 JONES DANIEL 34 JOSEPHSON LYNN 1 JUOZAITIS AL 97 JURGENSEN SONNY 186 Olde Florida Golf Club EQUITY MEMBERS(209) as of 2/13/13 Last Name First Name Mbr# KAMMER ECKHARD 251 KAUFMAN DR KEITH 114 KELLY PATRICK 121 KELLY JOHN 361 KENOST ROBERT 344 KERRIGAN PATRICK 308 KHAYYAT DR GHASSAN 126 KILTS JAMES 212 KING THOMAS 310 KINSEY KENNETH 207 KLEIN PETER 343 KROL JOHN 257 KUKK TJ 19 LAHAIE MICHEL 371 LASPROGATA VINCENT 214 LEAHY _ JAMES 181 LEMMON RON 259 LENNY RICHARD 291 LETTL ERICH 194 LIPMAN DAVID 160 LIVNEY ROLAND 127 LOCKWOOD STEPHEN 130 LOMBARDO FRED 51 LOTT EDWARD 134 MAGEE MICHAEL 322 MAGEE DON 323 MALLOY III MALCOLM 94 MARK RANDY 375 MATHIAS DR. PHILLIP 223 MAYNARD MARK 366 MCCARTHY,JR. ROBERT 314 MCGAVICK MICHAEL MCGLINN, II JOHN 313 MCGLINN,JR. TERRANCE 312 MCGLOTHLIN JAMES 255 MCHUGH JAMES 73 MCHUGH JAMES 74 MCINTOSH BARREN 213 MCINTYRE _ RICHARD 295 MCNAMARA JOHN 163 MEYER KENNETH 222 MICHELSON RICHARD 144 MILLER DOUGLAS 331 Nine Olde Florida Golf Club EQUITY MEMBERS (209) as of 2/13/13 Last Name First Name Mbr# MONSEES TULL 115 MOORE PHILLIP 237 MORLEY FRANCIS 231 MOSIER FRANK 52 MURRAY THOMAS 339 MYNHIER M H 96 NELSON RONALD 190 NOWAK(USAF, RET) LT GEN JOHN 305 NUGENT MARK 345 O'NAN LESLIE 307 OSMOND MARTIN 341 PALMER JOHN 360 PALUMBO SEBASTIAN 362 PARENTE CHARLES 66 PATRICK SCOTTY 274 PETITTI CECIL 370 PICCIONE ANDREW 328 PIPER GEORGE 63 POLING ESTATE OF HAROLD 196 POLLOCK JOHN 332 PONTIKES NICHOLAS 9 PONTIKES _ WILLIAM 110 POWELL JEFFREY 285 PULTE WILLIAM 287 QUINBY CLYDE 5 RHATIGAN RAYMOND 109 RINGLER JAMES 346 ROBISON WILLIAM 232 ROGERS JOHN 61 ROLAND E. EARL 42 ROSE KELLY 304 ROSS J R ALTON 185 RUED SCOTT 372 RUED JOSEPH 373 RYAN NORMAN _ 140 SARRAZINE DOUGLAS 264 SCOTT JAMES 318 SCURTO RUSSELL 353 SHEPHERD DAVID 363 SHERMAN D MICHAEL 2581 SIMPSON DAVID 298 SIMPSON LISA 340 SLEVIN JOHN 68 0 Olde Florida Golf Club EQUITY MEMBERS (209) as of 2/13/13 Last Name First Name Mbr# SMEDS EDWARD 155 SMIGEL ROBERT 166 SOBOLESKI JAMES 342 SOFOS ANTHONY 294 SOKOLIS WILLIAM 325 SOKOLIS MARK 358 SOMERVILLE ROBERT 245 SORDONI STEADMAN ESTATE OF GEORGE 242 DON 319 STEERE JR WILLIAM 220 STEINHAUER JOHN 60 STEVENS MICHAEL 208 STRANG DONALD 290 STULTS G. RAY 227 STULTS LINDSEY 326 SULLIVAN WILLIAM 354 SWIGLO DANIEL 320 TAMRAZ PAUL 8 THOMAS MICHAEL 151 TONDURY FIAMMETTA 120 TOWELL DAVE 154 TRIGONY NICHOLAS 225 TUCKER JOHN 262 VAN METER WILLIAM 210 VAN PELT JAMES 44 VINING DR DONALD 12 WADSWORTH BRENTON 3 WEBB JOHNNY 315 WEEKLEY JOHN 374 WEINBERG RONALD 234 WELCH GERALD 156 WELLS GIFFORD 50 WESTOL LOUIS 98 WINDFELDT GENE 161 WINDFELDT TOM 349 YANKE MARK 338 ZACHO DENNIS 247 ZELLER CHARLES 253