DSAC Admin Code Subcommittee Minutes 01/24/2013 2013 DSAC
Administrative Code
Subcommittee
Minutes
January 24 , 2013
January 24, 2013
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
D R It w VELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE -
MAR i I /U13 u ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SUBCOMMITTEE
BY: ..._. ""'°" Naples, Florida, January 24, 2013
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee Administrative Code Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier,
having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR
SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management Division Building,
Conference
Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following
members present:
Clay Brooker
Misc.Corres: Robert Mulhere
Date:
Alexis Crespo
Item#:
Copies to: District I
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
ALSO PRESENT: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Assistant County Attorney
Caroline Cilek, Senior Planner
Ellen Summer, Planning Technician
Bill Schreck, The Henning Group
Dom Amico, ABB/ CBIA
Patrick Vanasse, RWA
Jeremy Frantz, Conservancy of Southwest Florida
1
January 24, 2013
1) DSAC Subcommittee Overview
a) Review of Administrative Code
i) Direction from BCC
(1) Ms. Cilek provided an introduction noting a draft of the Collier County
Administrative Code was prepared by consultant Mark White. Staff will be
modifying the draft to fit the needs of the County and present it to the Board of
County Commissioners for review and approval.
ii) LDC Amendment and types of changes
(1) Ms. Cilek reported there are three types of changes envisioned during the review
process:
(a) Correcting typos/inconsistencies/errors associated with the LDC made during
the drafting of the Admin Code and LDC documents.
(b) Global changes which are recommended by staff to be made and will be
identified when the documents are presented to the BCC. Changes may be in
one or both documents.
(c) Changes recommended as a result of Advisory Board reviews of the
document, envisioned for the next LDC Cycle.
b) Recommendations to Full DSAC
i) During its review of the draft Administrative Code and LDC amendments, the LDR
Subcommittee will be formulating recommendations to be forwarded to the full
DSAC to approveand recommend to the BCC.
c) Public Participants
i) The meetings are open to the public with participation welcomed from building
industry, environmental consultants, and other interested parties.
d) Next Meeting Date
i) To be determined.
2) Review of Administrative Code and Corresponding LDC Amendments
a) Ms. Cilek reported the meeting packet includes the following documents:
i) "LDC Amendment Packet for Administrative Code—Prepared Tuesday, January 15,
2013"
ii) "Collier County Administrative Code Draft—DSAC LDR Subcommittee Review—
Thursday, January 24, 2013— Chapters 1,2,3 [partial], and 8. "
The LDR Subcommittee reviewed the draft of the Administrative Code and discussed topics
including but not limited to the points listed below. When necessary, Staff noted the changes
to the draft based on input from the LDR Subcommittee members or public participants.
2
. r
January 24, 2013
Discussion points
Chapter 1
• It is proposed that the Administrative Code is adopted as a Resolution, as opposed to an
Ordinance, to allow changes to be made by presenting prepeses-to the BCC on the
consent agenda. ~ 0 5S
• Patrick Vanasse suggested that changes to website lints and contact information should
be allowed to be done administratively.
Chapter 2
• Staff to ensure the notifications periods are consistent throughout the document for
providing notices "at least 15 days prior" as opposed to the absolute "15 days prior."
• Consider incorporating"property owners in the notification area"as a defined term in the
document and consistently identify these terms in bold and/or capitalized.
• Consider formatting the document so all applicable requirements for an individual
category of a comprehensive plan amendment is identified in their own section, i.e. one
section for"small comp. plan amendments"and another section for"regular comp. plan
amendment."
Chapter 3
• Intro to Chapter 3- consider formally defining the parties deemed to have "legal
standing" in regards to land development applications.
• Consider alphabetizing each chapter for easy reference. An alternate concept is to
itemize them from most frequent petition to least frequent petition. Alphabetizing was
decided as the best method for organizing each chapter.
• Consider re codifying the process for appealing Planning Commission decisions in the
Land Development Code. Currently, it is not identified in the Code of Laws or the LDC.
• Consider adding the Appeals language to the Mixed Use Projects - Administrative
Approval petition section.
• Consider removing the text for the DRI Amendment section and solely reference the
State Statute.
Mr. Mulhere left the meeting at 4:35pm
Mr. Mulhere returned at 4:45pm
Ms. Crespo left the meeting at 4:45pm
Ms. Crespo returned at 4:50pm
3
January 24, 2013
Chapter 8
• Staff to review and make changes based on discussions today.
• Ms. Cilek reported she will incorporate any necessary changes into the document for
review by the Subcommittee.
• She requested LDR Subcommittee members review the LDC Amendment packet and
submit comments for review by Staff.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by
the order of the Chair at 5:10 PM.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SUB
CO MITTEE
These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on Fels ag,dot 3 ,
as presented ✓ , or as amended
4